lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Superman: The Animated Series

message: From the article:
:Although a spinoff of the blockbuster 1978 Richard Donner film, the animated series chose to tell its own version of the Superman legend by starting from scratch, beginning with the pilot episode "Last Son Of Krypton" (which retold Superman's origin).
In what way is the television series a spin-off from the movie?
They're separated by twenty years and have no cast or crew in common that I'm aware of.
If the series is a spin-off from anything other than the comic books, it's Batman: The Animated Series.
—Paul A 01:59, 18 Dec 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: If the official title of the series is simply "Superman" shouldn't the article go by that title?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.253.64.213 (talk) 23:26, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Point well taken. Furthermore, there was no on-screen title at all. Like sibling series Batman: The Animated Series on the Fox network a few years earlier, there was nothing but a montage of images for the opening "titles" until it merged with the Batman episodes into a combination-titled one-hour show. Admittedly, this article would have to have "1990s TV cartoons," "WB network cartoons" or something of the sort in parentheses, but it would then bear the "official" title outside them. Anybody else? --Ted Watson (talk) 21:34, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: The Animated Series

message: Am I the only one who is bothered by the fact that this show, along with two other DCAU shows and Pinky and the Brain, is being put on Disney XD, a network that is owned by Disney?! Surely I'm not the only one who hasn't forgotten that The Walt Disney Company and Warner Bros. are bitter enemies! --74.167.107.134 (talk) 00:39, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: "Bitter enemies"? First I've heard that, and these Warner shows being on a Disney channel works against that. Disney XD, BTW, is not a new channel, as the article claims, but a retitling (reformatting?) of Toon Disney. These shows and many others had been running on TD for some time. XD just doesn't look all that different from TD. --Ted Watson (talk) 21:39, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: This show on Disney XD? Why?
Wikipedia talk:Spam

message: Discussion on Zach Iscol talk page concerning applicability of advertising assertion tag.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:7000:2143:8500:E82A:7668:3088:CA29 (talk) 20:41, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Propriety of tag

message: The redirect Wikipedia:Promotional has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Veverve (talk) 21:35, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Wikipedia:Promotional]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect Wikipedia:PROMOTE has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Veverve (talk) 10:42, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Wikipedia:PROMOTE]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The opening lines say "adding references with the aim of promoting the author or the work being referenced".  This occasionally seems to get interpreted as requiring editors to know the actual intentions of the accused refspammer.  I think we are more concerned about the appearance or result.  That is, if you cite the same source in 100 articles, we're going to be concerned about that because it looks like spamming even if your intentions might be as pure as new snow. WhatamIdoing (talk) 17:48, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mind reading
Talk:December 27

message: --mav 01:01, 1 Mar 2004 (UTC)

message: Why is the Patriot act in the 2001
Aventar100@yahoo.com —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.225.180.186 (talk) 18:23, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Patriot Act 

message: Dear John,
Aren't you the extravagant one! Now I really must protest. I don't deserve such generosity (three French hens), but I must insist; you've been too kind.
All my love,
Agnes  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.89.177.161 (talk) 19:38, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Twelve Days of Christmas
Talk:History of aviation

message: In section "Airships", there is a line that says:
"…Santos-Dumont went on to design and build several aircraft. The subsequent controversy surrounding his and others' competing claims with regard to aircraft overshadowed his great contribution to the development of airships."
Is it just me, or does this seem somewhat lopsided? What controversy?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by FavoritoHJS (talk • contribs) 22:54, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Something seems fishy… 

message: Just a small nitpick. On the timeline where it reaches the B2 Spirit, it's actually the outline of an F117 Nighthawk. Should we find a correct one or just leave it as is considering the casual reader wouldn't notice the difference? GansMans (talk) 02:43, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The aviation timeline needs to be redone, or eliminated if it is not possible to correct it. Besides the various spelling mistakes I've seen at a couple of spots, there are conceptual ones as well: militar should be military; sperimental should be experimental; Blerot should be Bleriot; aircraft should be airplanes, since the word aircraft includes hot-air balloons, and dirigibles. These are not just typos, and the ones I listed were from taking a glance, thus clearly there are more. -- Gciriani (talk) 14:45, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aviation timeline
Talk:Gorki Leninskiye

message: What is meant by "the Moscow head Reinbot"?  Is this a person, or an organisation, or what??  JackofOz 05:32, 18 Dec 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: He was a head of Moscow. Drbug 09:41, 18 Dec 2003 (UTC)

text: Head of city is similar to western mayor, but Russian office title is not translated as "mayor". I personally don't see "head of Moscow" ambiguous - from my point of view, it doesn't imply political leadership... I appreciate any good ideas how to make it clear! Drbug 12:14, 19 Dec 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Lists of video games

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Video game list list. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Regards, SONIC678 03:53, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Video game list list" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: There is a index of Windows games, and also a list of PC games and the list of PC games include Windows, should there be two lists of the same platform? StarStorm10 (talk) 13:29, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of PC games
Talk:Nathan Söderblom

message: Help Wanted  from a bilingual person who could help me to translate in good English :
:-Libéralisme théologique  (called here Liberal) 
:-Christianisme Pratique  which is a trend whère people thinks that social action is a better way than Doctrine or Dogma.
Many thanks in advance
Stuart Little 08:17, 18 Dec 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd suggest "Theological Liberalism" for the first, "Practical Christianity" for the second. --MIRV 08:20, 18 Dec 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It seems that much of this article has been copied verbatim from Söderblom's biography at the Nobel Prize site; at the bottom of that page it says "Copyright © The Nobel Foundation 1930".  I have thus listed this article at Wikipedia:Suspected copyright violations.  If I have made a mistake please accept my preemptive apologies. Adso de Fimnu 14:15, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Absolutely correct.  Thank you for pointing this out.  I am being WP:BOLD bold and deleting the copyvio sections. --Butseriouslyfolks 17:57, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Plagiarism
Talk:Lists of television stations in the United States

message: Seems to me that the info contained on this page is redundant and would be better off filed under the correct states on the List_of_local_television_stations_in_North_and_Central_America page and subpages. I don't think one big list of all the stations is really that helpful, especially when the information here is as sparse as it is.
Richardsur
----
Hi - cool idea.  Is it really necessary to use the term "Fox Box" and "Kids WB" after Fox and WB stations?  It's not as if either are separate networks, and it's not if every Fox and WB affiliate doesn't broadcast those programs on Saturday morning, correct?  I just don't see the need to represent those programming blocks as separate stations.  Enlighten me if I'm missing something, please.
:It seems unnecessary to me to include different program blocks - they're still part of the same network. Evil saltine 08:43, 18 Dec 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: 18.24.0.120 04:34, 27 Jan 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've moved the content of this (long) page into two separate (shorter) pages. - dcljr 04:12, 14 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  split into K and W pages 

message: OBTW, please see my comments in Talk:Lists of television channels if you are interested in standardizing the various television station/channel pages. - dcljr 04:21, 14 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Massive problems 

message: --Wyn.junior (talk) 00:21, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are these over the air stations only?
Talk:Intersection (disambiguation)

message: where is the intersection of two lines?
: Depends on where the two lines are pointing... Dysprosia 09:07, 18 Dec 2003 (UTC)

message: Although I'm not qualified to write it, INTERSECT is an SQL construct similar to UNION.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mfstutz (talk • contribs) 20:07, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I added a link to the article Set operations (SQL), which already covers this. --Zundark (talk) 20:21, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  INTERSECT NEEDS NEW DEFINITION ADDED
Talk:Villanelle

message: I'm planning a major rewrite. Draft at User:Bmills/Villanelle. 
Text as overwritten by Bmills 14:54, 18 Dec 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'll put the explanation of A1 and A2 back in and try to make it clearer.
--Amanda French 16:06, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Re: Confusion

message: http://www.slate.com/id/2128464/tap2/
Kind of cool!
Here's what it said: The thank-you note, however, is a difficult form, only slightly less tricky than the villanelle. (Narkstraws 01:27, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slate linked to this article 

message: Do we have the proper copyright to quote an entire poem of Sylvia Plath's?  I don't think that's public domain... --Khazar 17:45, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright? 

message: The etymology section states that "The word villanelle derives from the Italian villanella, referring to a rustic song or dance..." while the 'See Also' section describes "Villanella, (plural villanelle) an Italian song form with a rustic theme, mistakenly cited as the origin of the villanelle." So is the Italian villanella song the origin of the villanelle form or not? Or is it the case that the form did not originate from the song but the etymology takes from the song? This seems confusing and possibly contradictory. 
Thanks! --2601:147:4180:AB00:3462:F193:4649:7AE9 (talk) 06:01, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Contradiction in etymology

message: Just go to :
https://www.guitareclassiquedelcamp.com/viewtopic.php?p=350722#p350722 90.113.21.1 (talk) 09:34, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Complement
Talk:Spartan Alphabet

message: Original text was:
The Spartan Alphabet is a simplified form the common Latin alphabet used by those certain in their convinction that the Bush Administration is an alien conspiracy, whose purpose is to weaken the world's population through the slow erosion of our amassed supply of Giblet-based atmospheric weapons.
I guess the above qualifies as patent nonsense?
Lupo 10:57, 18 Dec 2003 (UTC)
Talk:Rank-into-rank

message: Regarding the current page contents, would it be safe to say that a cardinal λ is (a) rank-into-rank iff it satisfies one of the four axioms? (which?) -- Schnee 11:54, 18 Dec 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: Since I think that large cardinal properties which involve elementary embeddings belong to their critical points, I would call κ a rank-into-rank cardinal iff it is the critical point of any of the elementary embeddings mentioned in the definitions of I3, I2, I1, or I0. λ is larger than κ, but it is not as strong a limit, in fact, it has cofinality ω. JRSpriggs 05:58, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is &lambda; or &kappa; the rank-into-rank cardinal? 

message: The article mentions elementary embeddings of Vλ but also says that λ cannot be inaccessible (assuming choice). But an elementary embedding is an isomorphism between models, so if λ isn't inaccessible, what exactly is Vλ being considered as a model of? --  10:39, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A model of the theory of itself. Models are not required to be models "of" something given in advance. JRSpriggs (talk) 21:37, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps my previous answer was not sufficiently responsive. Vλ satisfies ZFC except for instances of the axiom of replacement where the image would have rank λ. In I2, M like V is a model of ZFC. Vλ+1 satisfies ZFC except for instances of replacement, pairing, or powerset where one of the given sets has rank λ. In I0, L(Vλ+1) satisfies ZF (without choice). I hope that helps. JRSpriggs (talk) 09:21, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elementary Embedding Of V<sub>λ</sub> For Non-Inaccessible λ? 

message: According to the article on Kunen's inconsistency theorem, one of its consequences says "If j is an elementary embedding of the universe V into an inner model M, and λ is the smallest fixed point of j above the critical point κ of j, then M does not contain the set j "λ (the image of j restricted  to λ).". However according to this article, rank-into-rank axiom I0 says "There is a nontrivial elementary embedding of L(Vλ+1) into itself with the critical point below λ.". Now, j "λ is a subset of λ and thus an element of Vλ+1. If we apply Kunen's result to the submodel V'  = M'  = L(Vλ+1), does this not result in a contradiction since M'  contains the forbidden element? JRSpriggs (talk) 21:37, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I see now that I was forgetting that L(Vλ+1) may not satisfy the axiom of choice. JRSpriggs (talk) 18:21, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is I0 inconsistent?
Talk:Government Medical College, Kozhikode

message: The contents on this page is available at http://cmcnetwork.netfirms.com/profile.html and other mirror sites developed by Dr Vinod Scaria. The author owns the copyrights of the content posted.
Content moved to a section under Calicut Medical College and this page made a redirect. RedWolf 09:17, Feb 29, 2004 (UTC)
::So does this sentence mean "We have a massive copyright violation here," or "I'm the copyright holder and I license this content under the GFDL"?  WhatamIdoing (talk) 23:09, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: The

message: A very large area on the eastern side of Kozhikode city remains unnamed.  People call it 'Medical College' and 'Kozhikode East'.  The term 'Kozhikode East' looks more acceptable. Prof. Manna (talk) 00:43, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Calicut Medical College Township 

message: I think that the article should be moved from Government Medical College (Kozhikode) to Government Medical College, Kozhikode. Currently the latter redirects to the former. An administrator would need to do it. DiptanshuTalk 04:27, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested move to [[Government Medical College, Kozhikode]] 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20031018235010/http://www.geocities.com/calicutstudents/profile.html, https://www.instituteofpalliativemedicine.org/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:30, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:The Law of Fives

message: The following text was removed, as I can find no verification for it.  To reinstate the text could you please include your source on this page.
*The Law of Fives Is the title of a five-book epic poem, currently complete to two books. The title of the story refers to a principle of Discordianism, which states that all things are indirectly related to the number five, and this is reflected in the iambic pentameter and groupings of five lines per stanza and five stanzas per canto.
HappyDog 14:03, 18 Dec 2003 (UTC)
Talk:Geometrized unit system

message: I went through and added the SI units and conversion factors to the table (a major edit at least in terms of work).
I cross-checked the conversion formulas for SI units with google calculator. Examples (cut and paste the following formula into google calc). epsilon_0 is "electric constant" in Google.
:(ampere)*(sqrt(G/(4*pi*electric constant)))/c^3=
:(tesla)*(sqrt(G*(4*pi*electric constant))/c)=
:(volt)*(sqrt(G*(4*pi*electric constant))/c^2)=
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Pervect (talk • contribs) 01:45, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: More edits

message: Hello Pervect
It seems that the sentence is incomplete:
In situations involving electrical units, we add the constraint that the quantity 4πε0, where ε0 is vacuum permittivity. 83.30.48.117 (talk) 18:00, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Introduction

message: as it is now, the two entries "elecitric potential" and "potential" (the very last) are identical. would it not make much more sense to interpret the second potential as gravitational potential? then its SI dimension would be [L2 T-2] (the same as energy/mass), and the multiplication factor would just be c-2. --Diogenes2000 (talk) 02:51, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potential 

message: Here you have all needed conversion factors that covers all SI base units, and if not possible, their unique elements:
into m
*G/c^2 [m/kg]
*c [m/s]
*((G/(4*pi*(electric constant)))^0.5)/c^2 [m/C]
*(G*k)/c^4 [m/K]
into kg
*c^2/G [kg/m]
*c^3/G [kg/s]
*1/(G*4*pi*(electric constant))^0.5 [kg/C]
*k/c^2 [kg/K]
into s
*1/c [s/m]
*G/c^3 [s/kg]
*((G/(4*pi*(electric constant)))^0.5)/c^3 [s/C]
*(G*k)/c^5 [s/K]
into C
*c^2/((G/(4*pi*(electric constant)))^0.5) [C/m]
*(G*4*pi*(electric constant))^0.5 [C/kg]
*c^3/((G/(4*pi*(electric constant)))^0.5) [C/s]
*(k*(G*4*pi*(electric constant))^0.5)/c^2 [C/K]
into K
*c^4/(G*k) [K/m]
*c^2/k [K/kg]
*c^5/(G*k) [K/s]
*c^2/(k*(G*4*pi*(electric constant))^0.5) [K/C]
All these units represents nothing else than distance along dimension, that makes SI redundant in comparison to geometrized units. I added all these abovementioned factors after proper formatting to article. They can be verified in Google calculator.
This all is exactly equivalent to dividing of one Planck unit by another Planck unit, while using their direct SI values. 83.30.150.203 (talk) 08:20, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Conversion factors between meter, kilogram, second, coulomb and kelvin
Talk:Hiiumaa

message: An anonymous contributor wrote:
Note: Dagö is on of Estonian favourite rock-bands, featuring sharp words of song texts, rocking sounds and charismatic presence of lead singer Lauri Saatpalu.
:This is valid, though a bit POV, and yields material for a stub. The text is related to this article, as Dagö is the Swedish name of Hiiumaa. Andres 16:50, 18 Dec 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Anon

message: The article says Hiiumaa was annexed by Nazi Germany in 1941. Is there any source for that. I am quite sure it was only occupied. Does anyone have information and/or reliable sources?
188.192.188.239 (talk) 10:45, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  WW 2
Talk:Gene Kranz

message: Added a section listing events and impact kranz has made since his retirement. Krjwvq (talk) 08:55, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Added detail regarding his life post-retirement.

message: In the career section, adding a sentence or two on MA-7 and added a new source. TheLoyalist1 (talk) 04:41, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Added more detail of his career

message: Under 'Apollo 13', adding on to highlight the specific recognition given by superiors, as well as adding citation. Krjwvq (talk) 17:42, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Added Detail and fixed citation

message: In 'Early years,' the article states "Krants [completed] pilot training at Lackland Air Force Base in Texas in 1955." Lackland AFB is where enlisted basic training takes place. But as an officer, it's more likely nearby Laughlin AFB where Kranz would've received undergraduate pilot training in 1955, not Lackland.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.113.7.30 (talk) 03:20, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Lackland AFB or Laughlin AFB?
Talk:John Thomas (harpist)

message: Thanks to User:Camembert for this info on the harpist, I've just moved it from the John Thomas article. Lou I 17:22, 18 Dec 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: As I understand it anyway, "Ap" is Welsh for "son of". It is not an abbreviation and so does not require a period (full stop).
His surname would be "Ap Thomas", rather than having "Ap." as an abbreviated middle name.
So is "Ap." the style he really used? Varlaam (talk) 16:58, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  John Ap. Thomas [sic] 
Talk:Mark Shainblum

message: To 67.70.180.157: Sorry if I gave you an edit conflict while you were editing this page. I was just itching to wikify it... did you know you put two apostrophes together at the beginning and end of a word or phrase to italicise it, you put three apostrophes at the beginning and end to make it bold, and you can make a new heading by putting two equals signs on either side of the heading you want. - Mark Ryan 17:58, 18 Dec 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled