Talk:Superhero film

message: I think this article should atleast mention the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles film from 1990. After all, it became one of the most succesfull indipendent films ever in the US. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.210.197.159 (talk • contribs) 22:16, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: TNMT

message: Shouldn't the Catwoman movie be mentioned somewhere?   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.208.211.48 (talk) 06:24, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Catwoman

message: Shouldn't the upcoming David Zucker superhero film spoof, Superhero! be mentioned in the article? --theblueflamingoSquawk 04:06, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably. Comic Book: The Movie too. I'll make a section. ~Switch t c g 10:57, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Superhero!

message: :Image:Phantomzane2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:16, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Phantomzane2.jpg

message: :Image:WinstonIronman.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 20:22, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:WinstonIronman.jpg

message: :Image:Wolverine3.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 21:44, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Wolverine3.jpg

message: The image :Image:ChristopherReeve Superman.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here.  In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.  Please check
:* That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
:* That this article is linked to from the image description page.
The following images also have this problem:
*:      Image:Spiderman movie.jpg
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --23:16, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image copyright problem with Image:ChristopherReeve Superman.jpg

message: A correctly licensed version of the Krrish image has now been uploaded.  It turns out that it was merely cropped from an image which can be downloaded from the official website, so there are no outstanding copyright issues.  However, I want to gather opinions on whether there's sufficient commentary on non-Hollywood movies to justify adding it. -- Skarl 11:23, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I wouldn't know if it demands it's placement over the other non-hollywood superhero flicks for an image. It wasn't any more popular then the other films, and didn't make a splash in America. It's hard to justify it. It would make more sense to post an image of the Incredibles as one of the most acclaimed and popular of Superhero films that isn't based off a comic book. Andrzejbanas (talk) 14:18, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The image just doesn't belong here. I agree with Andrzejbanas, an image of the Incredibles or Hancock seems like a better idea. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 23:51, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  This is really unfair....If a movie works in hollywood its a superhit film while other language films are totally ignored.Hollywood is being biased. If it dint make a splash in America so it doesnt deserve a spot here. what sense does it make.Hollywood should stop bein biased.And this image is a fare use now.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.201.41.134 (talk) 07:44, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

text:  Actually, it's unfair to choose Krrish over the several other countless superhero films that were non-hollywood. The image doesn't really illustrate anything the text doesn't already state. We took it down for the same reason we took down the images of Batman before. It doesn't add anything. Andrzejbanas (talk) 13:54, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Ok add any other non hollywood superhero film pic..  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.201.41.134 (talk) 17:24, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  123.201.41.134, let me make something clear to you: there doesn't need to be a Bollywood pic. The lead image already demonstrates what a live-action superhero is. If you're gonna put something in, it needs to have a non-related purpose. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 23:42, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Krrish.jpg]] 

message: The first mini series was published by Kitchen Sink Press not by Image Comics. The Crow predates Image comics as the first issue came out in 1981. Shouldn't this be called an independent property?   
173.98.167.33 (talk) 01:20, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: The Crow

message: If Batman is a superhero movie, then Zorro is also a superhero movie, right? Calvero2 (talk) 12:09, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: According to this book, traditional superheroes start with Superman. Here, Bob Kane, who created Batman mentions Zorro as an influence on his Batman character, but other than that, I don't find any strong or major writing on super heroes or comics that include him in the genre. I do not believe he should be added. Andrzejbanas (talk) 12:27, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Zorro

message: What makes a film series a franchise?  The article states that Blade was the first superhero franchise, but why wouldn't that term be applied to the four Superman  or four Batman movies?  Rojomoke (talk) 19:05, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Ahh! Good point. This was supposed to say "Marvel released Blade which was their first series to become a franchise". Batman and Superman are DC. There we go! Andrzejbanas (talk) 01:50, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Franchise 

message: I think this article looks really messy, and isn't very easy to read through. This is mainly because of the article being entirely prose. It explains patterns, but lists the films in sections of these patterns (within each decade), which provides an illogical feel to the article that is very difficult to interpret. Therefore, I think that since most of the prose is just listing films, we should instead, list films in a table. This would be much neater, and allows for more precise prose sections that don't list every single superhero film, and hence are much easier to interpret. --ProfessorKilroy (talk) 12:49, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: We might could do some kind of revamp. If there's better suggestions. This "list films in a table" sounds nice but it sounds similiar to List of American superhero films. Jhenderson 777 15:10, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Well in that case, we could still remove the lists within the prose, and just use prominent examples when needed. And then either provide a link on this page to the list, or merge the two pages, so the list is on this page. Do you have anything else in mind to revamp the article? --ProfessorKilroy (talk) 23:09, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I am not quite sure but I would think there could be alternatives to the problem. I am aware of a lot of flaws on the article  while reading it though and the animated film section (for example Jonah Hex should be on 2010 section) that was introduced has no citations. Jhenderson 777 14:44, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that a merge with List of American superhero films would be the way to go though, if you treat the page like List of highest-grossing films is treated. It is essentially a list page, but is very comprehensive, and contains detailed prose sections. So, I think that's the way to go on this one. Perhaps we should bring this up at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Comics for some more opinions if you would still prefer an alternative? --ProfessorKilroy (talk) 13:55, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I have no problem mentioning it on the Wikiproject page. The more opinions the better in my opinion. IMO I would prefer the Film WikiProject film myself and then link it on the Comic WikiProject.Jhenderson 777 16:34, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

text: It is a lot of work, and it's not really work that I'm up for. I don't really have enough time, or experience with this kind of thing. I'll just bring it up on the project talk pages. --ProfessorKilroy (talk) 07:41, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

text: Hi, DWB. Exactly: Something along the lines of Marvel Cinematic Universe or James Bond in film, where there's a chart but it's mostly real-world context and background, as opposed to just listy prose. --Tenebrae (talk) 21:10, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: You could do something like:
Title                 	Released         	Budget      	Box office (worldwide)	Series                  	Based on      	Studio
Superman              	December 10, 1978	$10 million 	$400,234,010          	Superman 1970 series    	Superman      	Dovemead, Film Export A.G., International Film Productions
Blade II              	March 22, 2002   	$10 million 	$90,200,213           	Blade Trilogy           	Blade         	
Batman                	June 17, 1989    	$40 million 	$200,343,234          	Er...early Batman series	Batman        	
V for Vendetta        	June 17, 2005    	$40 million 	$291,434,234          	                        	V for Vendetta	
My Super Ex-Girlfriend	June 17, 2006    	$30 million 	$60,343,343           	                        	              	
The Dark Knight       	June 17, 2008    	$100 million	$1,242,242,123        	Nolan Trilogy           	Batman        	
Just an idea obviously, don't know if you would include the country info/budget/gross, and you'd maybe have release year instead of exact date, or you'd have to add the sort template so it sorts correctly by date (or maybe the filmddate template would work). Darkwarriorblake (talk) 12:46, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

text: Yeah, real-world context and background with a table like this seems the way to go. My problem with this table is that it doesn't sort by series, so when sorted by the character based on, the different eras of say, Batman are all mixed in together, so it doesn't reflect development over the years. However, if this can be clearly outlined in the prose, then maybe it's not such an issue. Also, I think country, gross and other info kind of columns would be great. --ProfessorKilroy (talk) 00:29, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not quite clear what you mean by series, do you mean film series, not the comics? Let's see what I can do. I added a few columns and more test data to give a greater idea of how it would work in practice. It'd still need some styling, obviously the center doesn't work. Well it can but to me at least it looks a little off because the headers are being offset by the little sorting diamond. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 00:46, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah! That works. Something like that would be great. Yeah, I meant film series. Oh, and would a Studio column be useful? --ProfessorKilroy (talk) 03:54, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know about studio, just looking at the first one, Superman, there are 3 studios listed. You can add them, but it'd probably look a mess. Blade II also has 3, so you could leave them inline and separated by commas or give each a new line, but when you have a list of maybe 100+ films, the list is going to be doubled or tripled in size if the studios break onto new lines. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 14:58, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: True. The reason I brought it up was because of the situation with Marvel's characters being owned by different studios, and to compare that to other studios, but I guess it's not that important for the table. --ProfessorKilroy (talk) 15:12, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

text: Looks good to me. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 02:19, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: So are you going ahead with this Kilroy or still working on it?Darkwarriorblake (talk) 23:51, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, I only just noticed this now. Yeah, I don't have a lot of time on my hands, so it'd be great if someone could take over. --ProfessorKilroy (talk) 22:20, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revamp? 

message: I think, instead of the shot of the actor Christopher Reeve, this shot of Reeve as Superman would be far more effective in demonstrating what it means:
http://backseatcuddler.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/christopher-reeve-superman.jpg
It's a much better shot of the actor himself, and puts the picture in very clear context. A picture of Reeve dressed as Superman is definitely more clear in the context of the page.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.6.66.56 (talk) 03:19, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Main Picture Change 

message: What about Chronicle? --92.225.70.63 (talk) 00:38, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chronicle 

message: Maximilianklein (talk) 23:55, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: WorldCat Genres

message: Although they're a hybrid of action, fantasy, sci-fi, and drama, due to their often similar tones and themes, wouldn't "Superhero" be considered a genre of film? There are plenty of written articles that refer to it as a genre, and they're never strictly considered subgenres of fantasy or science fiction. All of those could be under the umbrella of speculative fiction, so it stands to reason that Superhero should be its own genre alongside them. If there's a consensus, I feel this article should make note of it as a genre of film. 50.98.18.29 (talk) 21:20, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Genre?

message: Someone should add Deadpool to the mention of superhero movies in the 2010s.CountHacker (talk) 06:44, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deadpool 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Superhero film. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.eonline.com/uberblog/b37970_Cameron_Spun_Out_of_Spider-Man_Movie.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:09, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Superhero film. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.eonline.com/uberblog/b37970_Cameron_Spun_Out_of_Spider-Man_Movie.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071124103731/http://www.superheroeslives.com:80/ to http://www.superheroeslives.com
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:31, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Can we give the box office section it’s own page like List of highest-grossing superhero films User:Fanoflionking 19:43, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: a super new page

message: Hope you don't mind, just had to do a massive tidy up of the 2010s section, as it was extremely messy. Information has been simplified to most important details. More can be done. Rebirth3k (talk) 19:43, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent Tidy Up 

message: Please, add more Godzilla and Ultra Series mentions. They are two of the most popular Japanese franchises. --Дейноніх (talk) 07:56, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Godzilla and Ultra Series 

message: The paragraph-long list of superhero films released in the 1980s is much too short to be anywhere near comprehensive and much too long if the intention is to give just a few examples. Perhaps it would be better to have a link to a subcategory page? Evanf32 (talk) 21:56, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discretion for movies listed as examples 

message: The redirect Superhero landing has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Aaron Liu (talk) 23:03, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Superhero landing]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: Hi Can Someone check this list. A lot of films on this list doesn't look like Superhero films (like Star wars and Indiana Jones films) Sid95Q (talk) 06:46, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[List of American superhero films]]