lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Category talk:Wikipedia requested images of people

message: The list of requests for photographs of people has become too large to be of use to anyone. I propose to split the main categories into a number of smaller and more specific categories so that people will be more willing to attempt addressing and reducing the list.
Proposal documented here: User:People-photo-bot. Comments welcome before I start working further on the task.--Traveler100 (talk) 05:32, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like that's been DONE.-- (t•c) 23:31, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  photo requests 

message: I recently realized that facebook <sic> is a rich source of free content!  As I documented in , the legal Terms of Use of facebook say: "When you publish content or information using the Public setting, it means that you are allowing everyone, including people off of Facebook, to access and use that information, and to associate it with you (i.e., your name and profile picture)." and "By "use" we mean use, run, copy, publicly perform or display, distribute, modify, translate, and create derivative works of."  https://www.facebook.com/terms.php November 15, 2013 version, accessed Aug 2 2014.
So, Public content on facebook is free, but content just shared with friends or groups is not free.
(If someone releases content under a free license they didn't own the copyright to in the first place, the license is not valid.  Like with any other content published under a free license,  this is the case with content published on facebook with a Public privacy setting.) 
Nonetheless, some closed-minded folk are intent on deleting the template...  there's a discussion going on...-- (t•c) 23:31, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: RICH SOURCE OF '''FREE''' (as in freedom) PHOTOGRAPHS OF PEOPLE 

message: I can't help but notice that there are a large number of photo requests that are very unlikely to be able to be fufilled by anyone - perhaps should the photo request template be removed one year after a person has been deceased or something like that, due to the unlikelylihood of being able to attain a free photo, and so that more possible requests can be fufilled?.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 20:13, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo requests of dead people
Talk:1927 Georgia Bulldogs football team

message: So is this article for the 1920 team or the 1927 team?--NMajdan•talk 22:06, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Its for the 1927 team - that's what I get for doing a "cut & paste" job.  Thanks for catching it.--Tlmclain  | Talk 22:42, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  1920 or 1927? 

message: This now redirects to Georgia Bulldogs football under Kid Woodruff.--Tlmclain  | Talk 22:12, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Now a redirect page
Talk:1896 Georgia Bulldogs football team

message: The text of this article has been combined with the text of the former article at 1895 Georgia Bulldogs football team to created Georgia Bulldogs football under Pop Warner.  This was done to conform college football season articles to the naming conventions developed at Wikipedia:WikiProject College football.  See discussion here, which is part of the larger discussion here. --Tlmclain  | Talk 15:12, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ward House (Seattle)

message: NOTE!!! THIS MAY NOT BE THE OLDEST HOUSE IN SEATTLE
2629 E ALOHA ST was built in 1881, as is still in its original location. 
http://web1.seattle.gov/dpd/historicalsite/QueryResult.aspx?ID=2147011281  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryanthompson (talk • contribs) 23:20, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: ... I've linked (in the external links) this article by Rob Ketcherside about the house and the Ward family. Rob is a member of the Seattle Landmark Preservation Board and author of Lost Seattle. There is a lot of better research there than in the sources used to develop this article; among other things, he contests the information here about date of construction. - Jmabel | Talk 19:55, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: If anyone wants to work further on this...
Talk:Wawona (schooner)

message: The Wawona is in rather bad shape, and is in danger of losing its current resting place. Someone may want to do some research into this and update the article from citable sources. - Jmabel | Talk 21:13, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Status 

message: Today's Seattle Times ran a story that the Wawona is being towed to dry dock on Lake Union: http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2008811565_webwawona04m.html.
I agree that it would be good to flesh out the info on this page with more history. As someone who grew up in Kirkland, WA, I remember touring the Wawona as a kid, when she was moored at the Kirkland pier on Lake Washington, but there's no mention of Kirkland moorage on this page. Techwritrr (talk) 18:13, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: By all means, continue posting links to any articles you come across; this page may not be anyone's pet project, but passing editors are much more likely to flesh out an article if the sources have already been found. I'll get around to it myself eventually if nobody beats me to it. And, of course, you're free to add the information yourself, though it's important that everything be referenced. Let me know if you'd like help with anything. --Fullobeans (talk) 04:03, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Status update
Talk:University Bridge (Seattle)

message: The section about Occupy Seattle does not warrant a place on this page. It reads like a promotional piece for the movement and only lasted for 1.5 hours. — Preceding unsigned comment added by User: (talk • contribs) 73.42.206.113 (UTC)
Does the "Occupy Seattle" section really belong here? One political demonstration in a city that sees dozens every year. I personally have been on that bridge as part of one or another organized or impromptu demonstration at least half a dozen times. I'm not at all sure what is supposed to be significant about that one. - Jmabel | Talk 21:50, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: What's your goal here? Is it to argue we should replace with a claim saying something like "this bridge is commonly used by protestors"; that is, the 2011 protest doesn't stand out? Or is it to remove the section altogether, claiming this event and others like it aren't notable? CapnZapp (talk) 10:23, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  Remove altogether. If we mentioned every political demonstration in Seattle that shut down a road for a few hours we could fill a small book. - Jmabel | Talk 18:35, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Occupy Seattle
Talk:Zodiac (schooner)

message: If someone gets a picture of the ship, please add it to Commons; it would make a great addition to the article; also, it would be very welcome in the obvious location in the table at List of Registered Historic Places in King County, Washington#Seattle (yes, I realize it's not in Seattle any more) and presumably in List of Registered Historic Places in Washington#Bellingham. - Jmabel | Talk 09:13, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: While Zodiac is now based in Washington state the historical period of importance is the 41 years active operation centered in the San Francisco, California area as the pilot vessel California. There the vessel was of real note as the "greeter" of commercial and naval vesselsarriving and departing Golden Gate—including those troop ships where California was the last real contact with "home" as the ship set out to war—and, in the last decade at least as a unique one the city. A personal recollection is of coming in from weeks at sea and taking on a pilot with some of the ship's officers commenting on what a perfect symbol of the city a sailing pilot vessel made. Everywhere else we had motor vessels, some quite nice themselves, come along. Only at San Francisco one would take on or drop the pilot with an "antique" sailing vessel, a perfect match for the iconic Golden Gate Bridge. People normally not much interested in the pilot vessel would come on deck to look at this one. A case could be made for moving this article to California as with obscure commercial vessels that had a brief period of notable service in WW II under a USS or other operating name and sank back into obscurity under an original name. In my opinion this is a toss up with a good case for using the historic Zodiac name so probably best left as is with redirects. In any case, the article could use a boost from those with local San Francisco or California resources. Palmeira (talk) 13:58, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  San Francisco/California local help
Talk:Moshe Friedman

message: He intervened in the case before the Belgian Constitutional Court about unstunned religious slaughter. While the claimant jews state a ban on unstunned slaughter goed against their religious freedom, he defends the ban.----Bancki (talk) 13:29, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  position on unstunned religious slaughter
Talk:Pope Nicholas II

message: This section seems to be important, but makes no sense.  Perhaps someone who knows something can straighten it out.165.127.8.254 21:27, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Election Reform 
Talk:Marcel Carné

message: Carne's lover is described as "on-time". Unless he was remarkably punctual I presume this is an error. But is it an error for "one-time" or "long-time"? Someone in the know please correct! 142.68.219.110 (talk) 00:44, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: You might want to add that Carné and Lesaffre are (now, since Lesaffre's death in 2009) buried together in Carné's tomb in the cemetery of St Vincent in Montmartre (see http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roland_Lesaffre as reference).  Lesaffre was also sole heir to Carné's estate.  Whilst it is certainly true that "Carné was gay and made little secret about it", I suspect the issue was a bit more fraught for Lesaffre, whose public image was that of being a "man's man" (he had been boxing champion of the French Navy, inter alia) --- during his life he constantly dodged the issue (indeed he was married twice himself), and when pressed said his and Carné's relationship was one of "homosensuality" rather than homosexuality --- make of that what you will...  猫に小判 15:04, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Lesaffre
Talk:Slash chord

message: I've removed the last Paragraph since it (incorrectly) assumes that every musical bit is written in a single scale.
That fact that it doesn't make the paragraph's contents self implied.
:I wonder what the paragraph was about. Hyacinth (talk) 04:32, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed

message: Although you often hear C/G read as "C slash G", I'd still prefer the old-fashioned (?) pronounciation "C over G", which really has its charms. It should at least be mentioned.
193.128.87.36 (talk) 16:39, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Over vs slash

message: "By placing the third of the V chord in the bass, a descending scale, also known as a walkdown, is created in the bass. For example, in the key of G major this would be the chords G, D/F♯, Em."
I don't know much about this (hence my reading this page), but my current understanding makes me think this is wrong.  Wouldn't we need to invert both the third and fifth to get a D/F# for the fifth chord?
--Fogsparrow (talk) 19:57, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Is this right?
Talk:Breit equation

message: the Breit 'equation' isn't so much of an equation as it is just a perturbing operator.  Also, in the literature it is usually called the Breit-Pauli operator.  I think the title of the article should reflect that.
Question. For H6, is it assumed that the vector potential A is in the Coulomb gauge? Also, p needs to be defined. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:26, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

message: There seems to be a free index j in the H3 term. The first term consists of the inner product of spin s_i with the outer product [F(r_ij) x p_i]. In my opinion, the index j in F(r_ij) is not correct since there is no summation or other reference to it.129.13.72.198 (talk) 11:38, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Index in H3? 

message: It seems to me that there is mistake in the equation giving H_6. The factor mu_B should be inside the parenthesis (just before H) as it concerns only the spin contribution, not the orbital one. Can anyone confirm this?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 160.103.208.60 (talk) 15:30, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typo in Equation for H_6 ?
Talk:European Federation for Medical Informatics

message: Article created to provide additional information on science in Europe. Pvosta 21:44, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Valmet L-90 Redigo

message: Although Aermacchi purchased the manufacturing rights, should the article not be named after the original Valmet model considering that all actually manufactured examples belong to that series? -78.27.116.98 (talk) 14:37, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: From reading the article, you appear to be correct. It's possible that resumed production seemed likely when the article was written, but that never happened. I'll see what else I can find out. I might move it, or hold a move discussion first. BilCat (talk) 19:16, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name
Talk:Alenia Aermacchi M-346 Master

message: Really?
On what planet is that?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.182.42.91 (talk) 17:48, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mach 1.2 is 1092 km/h ? 

message: I propose that Leonardo DRS T-100 Integrated Training System be merged into Alenia Aermacchi M-346 Master. I think that the content in the T-100 article can easily be explained in the context of M-346, and the latter article is of a reasonable size that the merging of the former will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. If the T-100 is chosen for T-X, then a dedicated page would be warranted. Thanks. - BilCat (talk) 19:35, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Battle of the Styles

message: Problem with the phrase "debate about prefabricated stylistic options in architecture"
It's unclear, mostly due to the word prefabricated, which in architecture readily conjures up a specific construction methodology involving the use of components made in a factory rather than on site (e.g. prefabricated concrete panels, a prefabricated mobile home). One does not know if the phrase means there were stylistic options involving such factory produced components, or if 'prefabricated' is meant in the more general sense of predetermined, pattern-book, non-responsive or unoriginal.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.217.31.46 (talk) 10:32, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy

message: As a couple of other users have pointed out, this is not an EDS spectrum. It is, in fact, labeled as the an x-ray spectrum of a supernova.  Probably a self-emitter.  That leaves it out of the realm of things that emit x-rays after being bombarded with a beam of x-rays or of high energy particles, so let's leave it out of the article.  --Blechnic (talk) 02:22, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: Article is in an asian language (30.06.2013), albeit on the english wikipedia. Sorry that I don't change it back to an earlier version myself, I'm a newbie at editing and just want to point out the problem to an experienced user. Thanks.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.171.164.156 (talk) 18:40, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: :"electron dispersion spectroscopy"
Just wondering if anyone calls this "electron dispersion spectroscopy", or if it's just an online misprint/error.
—DIV (137.111.165.22 (talk) 06:24, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name(s) 
Talk:Phil Cantillon

message: Is there link to Cantillon of Kerry & France? 88.97.108.45 (talk) 18:08, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cantillon of Kerry & France
Talk:Aero A.34 Kos

message: Hi, designed in 1929, first-flight in 1928? Something must be wrong.
Greetings from Germany. --Grimmi59 rade (talk) 21:55, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Dan Whitesides

message: If whoever added the other previous bands that Dan Whitesides has been in doesn't organize them correctly - (punctuation, capitalization, ect.) - I'm going to have to remove them. MusicGirl21 21:53, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have gone ahead and deleted these. If they have a need to go back up, make sure they are added correctly and place them before the "stub" notice. Thanks! MusicGirl21 00:34, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Previous Bands
Talk:Aero Ae 270 Spirit

message: I did some editing for the prototype sentences but do they really need to be there in the prose like that?  Seems like when all of the testing happened for them isn't important and it should really be removed unless any of them were significant. Dreambeaver (talk) 20:40, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: No offence, but your Talk contribution is as confusing as the alleged issues in the article you refer to - just saying... Soulparadox 15:22, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prototypes 
Talk:Heaven Beside You

message: Does anyone have a reliable source that specifically refers to this song as grunge? At the time, Alice in Chains were an important band associated with the Seattle scene; every song they'd written from 1990-1995 qualifies, even if loosely so (as the genre itself is pretty loosely defined). "Heaven Beside You" is unquestionably grunge, yet I can't find a single reliable reference that explicitly describes the song as such. Is anyone else able to find one? Kurtis (talk) 05:25, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grunge?
Talk:Aero Boero AB-115

message: You guys know in what countries is the AB-115 used? Because as far as I know, they are only used in Brazil, mostly as trainer aircrafts.
The AB-115 is the most used of them, and is nicknamed "Boerinho" (Little Boero). Its bigger brother, the AB-180, is also used here in Brazil, in both trainer roles and sailplane towing, and is nicknamed "Boerão" (Big Boero). It might also be intersting to note that, in portuguese, "boero" sounds identical to "bueiro", which means literally "manhole" (no, seriously, take a look at the wikitionary!). I don't have to say how many jokes we hear about it at the Brazilian aviation schools.
189.15.226.222 (talk) 23:33, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

message: I am adding a few more informations to this article. I've changed some data in the Specifications section, based on the real aircraft's manual and flight impressions by actual instructors. If you guys want, I can include the references (though I don't know if they are available online).
Cpt Vidal (talk) 03:04, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: You need to provide a proper cite to a reliable source. Otherwise your changes are likely to be reverted.Nigel Ish (talk) 10:13, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Specs
Talk:Gossamer Wump

message: I created a link to "Dance of the Hours."  Since that article makes the point of the tune being used by Alan Sherman for "Hello muddah, hello foddah," and by Walt Disney in "Fantasia," I removed the statement here, as being superfluous.  140.147.236.195 (talk) 19:35, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Made link--superfluous info removed
Talk:Jijo (planet)

message: What's this book called Sooner Shoals ? I can't find anything about it... Any verification for it's existence? 209.247.22.23 21:59, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fragments of this book can be seen in Gurps Uplift, under the (temporary) name Jijo Ascendant. Albmont 22:32, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Stirling–Alloa–Kincardine rail link

message: From this article I can't tell whether the original line was closed in the 60s, or 2002. It would give some context to the article if it were to say 'the line had been closed since 1988 due to falling passenger numbers' or whatever.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.82.124.197 (talk) 12:38, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  closed in 1968. It was a Beeching closure. Freight services continued until the 1980s. See details at Stirling and Dunfermline Railway. --Stewart (talk | edits) 17:41, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  REopened? When did it close?
Talk:NCAA men's volleyball tournament

message: I'm don't know the exact rules for the at-large bid.  So I'm wondering why a non EIVA D-III school can't earn the at-large bid?  D-III schools like Carthage and Clarke in the MIVA can win the MIVA tournament and earn the automatic bid so why can't they receive the at-large bid?  And I know that they will never earn the at-large bid, but is there a rule that says that they can't?
I belive you are correct.  I forgot to consider those schools.  So yes, if Clarke, Carthage, or MSOE can manage to win the MIVA tournamnet, I believe they can get an automatic bid.
In terms of the at large bid, I'm also not sure of the at-large bid rules; generally it has gone to the second best MPSF team, but I'm not sure of any offical restrictions either.155.246.71.220 08:10, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Belgian Society of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

message: Article created to provide additional information on science in Belgium. Pvosta 22:03, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Remark
Talk:WLTW

message: On November 18, 2006 (the friday before Thanksgiving 2006)
Um, November 18, 2006 was a Saturday, and the first letter of days of the week should be capitalized. I haven't changed the article myself because I don't know the correct date. -- 63.145.26.194 22:06, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Category talk:Wikipedia requested photographs of sportspeople

message: The list of requests for photographs of people has become too large to be of use to anyone. I propose to split the main categories into a number of smaller and more specific categories so that people will be more willing to attempt addressing and reducing the list.
Proposal documented here: User:People-photo-bot. Comments welcome before I start working further on the task.--Traveler100 (talk) 05:32, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  photo requests