lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:SO Emyrne

message: I removed the entry for their home ground because it seems like most or all of the teams in Madagascar don't have their own stadiums and instead just play in public ones like Mahamasina Municipal Stadium and Alarobia Municipal Stadium. Recury 14:26, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

message: The claim about the club's 2006 results being forfeited after their 149-0 loss (all own goals) is dubious. I've tagged it as failing verification because the article in question is dated 2002, so naturally it says nothing about 2006 results. Perhaps this is a translation error. Were their 2006 results actually forfeited due to the 2002 incident (perhaps it took the authorities a while to decide this)? Were their 2002 results the ones forfeited? Did The Guardian just date their article wrong? Another citation is needed to clarify what happened. --BDD (talk) 23:23, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  149-0 result
Talk:Matthew Looney

message: After assembling this page, I found it difficult to determine when Jerome Beatty Jr died. Does anyone know?
yea i know,  he choked on some corn flakes.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Matthewlooney16 (talk • contribs) 13:52, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Author's death
Talk:Training Squadron 10

message: Some of this information, but not all, has been taken from the official US Navy web site fro VT-10 [Training Squadron 10] an is therefore from a US Government agency, and not subject to copywrite, and is in the public domain.  The logo, as well, is in the public domain,a nd was created by the US Navy.Bondo 16:38, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:List of tenants in 5 World Trade Center

message: Shouldn't the title of this article be List of tenants in World Trade Center Five to match the other articles in this group? Stardust8212 16:38, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like they've been changed to match this one.  RJFJR (talk) 16:45, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Rotation of axes in two dimensions

message: you have a mistake in your rotation formula:
x = x'cos(theta) - y'sin(theta)  is right, but
y = x'cos(theta) + y'cos(theta)  is wrong, coeff. for x' should be sin(theta)
< this is obvious, how can you have 3 cos(theta) in the equations, symmetry is destroyed!> — Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.166.226.88 (talk) 16:42, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mistake in formula 

message: When you are doing the derivation for the rotation formula and then you expand it in the second step, where do all your C - terms go? 
Where is the Cx'sin@^2 + Cy'cos@^2 + 2Cx'y'sin@cos@ ?? It is missing! Jkeesh 22:50, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: And the expansion of the terms in the derivation is missing the D term or parentheses and the expansion is just basically wrong. Jkeesh 22:58, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Is there a quicker way to calculate the rotated equation instead of having to use all those annoying substitutions?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.250.214.9 (talk) 12:25, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  C and D terms 

message: * In the lead, "counterclockwise" should be removed, for generality.
* The sections Rotation of loci, Elimination of the xy term by the rotation formula and Derivation of the rotation formula should probably be removed altogether, as an article about rotation of axes should not need lengthy derivations.
* Probably most important is that the article specifically addresses the rotation of conic sections but says nothing about a general rotation of coordinates, or linear maps, or matrices, or spaces of more than two dimensions. — Anita5192 (talk) 06:29, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The article has now been cleaned up. Hopefully this describes the actual subject well but still preserves the treatment that was in the original article without the text being entirely about conic sections.  The diagram is not perfect but is the best that I could find.  An ideal diagram should also depict the x, y, x'  and y'  coordinates of the point, label the point P, and label the angle between x and r as  \alpha .  I left the word "counterclockwise" in the lead, since it is common in textbooks to refer to a counterclockwise rotation as standard. — Anita5192 (talk) 20:35, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multiple issues 

message: A learner reading this may be baffled by equations (3) and (4).  They make use of the standard formulae for addition and subtraction of sines and cosines, but there is no reference to this, and they are not everyday knowledge to the man on the street.  Presumably they are explained somewhere else on Wiki, so a cross-reference would be useful.109.150.6.231 (talk) 14:02, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for pointing this out!    —Anita5192 (talk) 16:06, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trig formulae 

message: This article was originally called Rotation of axes and discussed the rotation of any number of axes. The article still discusses the rotation of any number of axes. So why change the name?—Anita5192 (talk) 04:46, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why the page move?
Talk:Central Board of Film Certification

message: I didn't add the tag in the Critical Analysis section, but it really is a mess. Needs cleanup, expansion and wikification. Considering the importance of the article, I have added it to the to-do list of Indian cinema task force--Anoopkn (talk) 12:09, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV

message: Added list of chairpersons & various loactions of the Board. List needed to see who precedded or successed whom. Also added citations Animeshkulkarni (talk) 08:15, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: my instinct is to include this (if properly sourced). the number of notable people who have held the position helps give context to the (currently missing) content of the historical actions of the organization. Active Banana  (bananaphone 14:57, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

text: The article should include something about the creation of the organization, major decisions that have impacted the content/production of films, professional reactions and comments (positive and negative) about the impact etc. particular decisions that later inspired actual legislation, major changes in policies or their application, when its decisions have inspired or contradicted other countries' rating boards... Whatever might be covered in reliable sources (other than specific decisions regarding a single film that did not have wider impact) Active Banana  (bananaphone 18:06, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: inclusion of historical list of chairs

message: This isn't accurate as to what makes up the ratings on the censor board. Films in India are almost never shown to contain any nudity and there are increasingly stringent measures regarding other things depicted in Indian theatres.In fact, the Censor board in India has always been conservative.47.20.236.125 (talk) 04:36, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: accuracy

message: I suggest that the recent criticisms against the CBFC be included in ths article as a separate section.
Ramakrishnan.nikhil (talk) 09:40, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclusion of section about recent criticism? 
Talk:Hof, Bavaria

message: I'd say it is well worth mentioning that in 1939, in Hof, was the only place and time during his 12 year regime that then-Chancellor Adolf Hitler was jeered and booed at an official visit. This later caused him to cancel the T4 project.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sparviere (talk • contribs) 13:44, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Claim to fame? 

message: My mother is from Hof I have been there several times as a child. No where can I find the official story of the cannon balls put into and still sticking out of the catholic church by the Swedes during the  30 years war. I was also told of a great massacre of the towns catholic residents who refused to convert by the Swedes I was told about 600 perished.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Theuglyfriend (talk • contribs) 19:03, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  30 years war 

message: Hof is clearly an example of the climate class "Dfb" - not a "Cfb" as presented in your article!
The coldest month is on average well below 0°C so Cfb is out of question. This is also the conclusion of your Ref. 17.
Otherwise nice article! best wishes from an exiled Hof-citizen ...
Daniel.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deni13 (talk • contribs) 22:29, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Climate
Talk:Hofbräuhaus am Platzl

message: In reference to the picture  , how do you reference oral history relayed to you? Hughsonj 15:13, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: I believe this page may be a duplicate of the following page:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Staatliches_Hofbr%C3%A4uhaus_in_M%C3%BCnchen however both pages have different information about the hofbrauhaus. Could the two articles be merged somehow?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.62.5.158 (talk) 17:56, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: They're not. Read the first paragraphs of each for an explanation. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 18:13, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplicate entry? 

message: Currently, the last paragraph in the section "Famous persons" includes the statement "the Hofbräuhaus am Platzl is Munich's most outstanding tourist attraction and historical monument." This is clearly an opinion, rather than a fact. It is also unrelated to famous patrons.
I have started a new section, and changed the wording to reflect facts, rather than opinion. 2603:7080:9600:5CBA:EC94:6079:373A:697 (talk) 20:13, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Famous persons: NPOV 

message: There is a confusion. This is not where the Beer Hall Putsch took place. 2600:1700:17F4:8840:D819:C75:5811:E76F (talk) 02:39, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hitler did not make his speech here
Talk:Max Havoc: Curse of the Dragon

message: Seems to me the article by Mike Leeder at ImpactOnline is not a reliable source seeing as Leeder is a producer (therefore essentially an employee) for Albert Pyun . While ImpactOnline may or may not be a reliable source, an interview/article written by Leeder re: Pyun most certainly has bias and point-of-view problems. Sprinkler21 (talk) 20:42, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Answered on your talk page. Daß Wölf (talk) 20:58, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm gonna be buried with life for awhile and won't be able to work on stuff around here for several days. I'm ok with every suggestion above except the last: I'm really curious as to why there would be a sequels section at all. It's mentioned the film had a sequel in the first paragraph and there's a link, why clutter what's turning out to be a great article with details about a sequel?  I'll try to get back to some of the gnome work here when I can. I really do appreciate your help on this. It's looking great. Sprinkler21 (talk) 22:28, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm pretty busy too at the moment, so sorry for not doing much with the article. I've shortened the part about the sequel and merged it into the Release section. Per WP:LEAD, "Apart from basic facts, significant information should not appear in the lead if it is not covered in the remainder of the article." The sequel is certainly notable in the context of Curse of the Dragon, as it features the same leading actor playing the same role in much of the same way as the first movie, and they were released as a double feature multiple times (I've mentioned one, since it would probably be overkill to list every DVD and Blu-ray version ever sold). Therefore I think it deserves to be mentioned in the article. Daß Wölf (talk) 14:55, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  I see your point. Changes look great. It's lookin' like a GA for sure. I'll continue working on it when I can. Sprinkler21 (talk) 22:15, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, and thanks again for all your hard work on the article :) Daß Wölf (talk) 22:22, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Production section 

message: GA Reviewer here -- I've archived some old threads on this talk page so as to help better assess stability and look at only current ongoing issues at present.
Metric used was archived threads older and with zero activity or new responses for over one (1) year.
They may now be seen in the link at the talk header at the top of this page.
— Cirt (talk) 11:16, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archived old threads 

message: Here is a discussion tangential to the article. Daß Wölf (talk) 14:11, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Off-talk page discussion
Talk:WKSE

message: per wikipedia's policy of using common names rather then proper names shouldn't this be moved to Kiss 98.5 instead of WKSE? --T-rex 16:43, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This websitewhich I located by doing an internet search includes a list of HD stations in Buffalo-Niagara Falls. WKSE among many others in the area are listed. The website for the station makes no mention of HD broadcasting or the additional WKSE channel listed in the hd radio list. None of the refs or external links verify that WKSE is broadcasting in HD.1archie99 (talk) 03:13, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  HD or Not?
Talk:John Katzman

message: There is a long-standing pattern of obvious COI editing on this article. A series of SPA's have edited this article adding nothing but information that is positive to neutral about the subject. One of these accounts is probably linked to a ghostwriter and PR consultant, which makes me believe the policy on paid editing has been violated. IP addresses that edit like SPA's on this article seem to come from the area where the subject lived most of his life. Here is a list of suspects:
People who inspire
2604:2000:F0CB:7300:BDC8:D4FE:2A89:AF76
 66.108.150.205
104.13.168.205
Transmissionelement This user has disclosed a COI on another article. They have made no disclosure here and their edits look suspicious. Where there is smoke...
Bleek888
166.172.61.246
206.217.117.226 This user even tried to spam Princeton University's article with promotional content on one of Katzman's companies called noodle.
1.52.231.67
104.148.250.86
Silverado60 This user has already been blocked for socking and I see many indicia of paid editing in their contributions.
118.68.208.32
 This user appears to share name with a ghostwriter and PR consultant and is making promotional edits.
Jwhny
204rm
 Was blocked for socking. Very clear indicia of paid editing.
This is pretty conclusive but I still have more to add. It will have to wait until later today or tomorrow when I have more time. In any event, you can clearly see the tags I am about to add are clearly justified. Classafelonymonkey (talk) 12:37, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you have the wrong person with me or misread an entry, and I don't understand what edit you are referring to as being COI, nor have I admitted (or have) a COI elsewhere. In 2014 I removed promotional material from the article and noted someone else appeared to have a COI, and thereafter the last edits I made on this article were in 2015 and were to change sources, and note there were issues with sources. I politely request you remove any reference to me here Transmissionelement (talk) 17:55, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Obvious COI editing 

message: This article should cite more sources. Lots of text is completely unsupported by sources and other parts of the article are supported by low-quality sources. Classafelonymonkey (talk) 12:43, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Rupert Mayer

message: A film was made of his life. Is it worth mentioning here ?— ⦿⨦⨀Tumadoireacht Talk/Stalk 06:38, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Film of his life
Talk:Celebrity Duets

message: I hate to "ding" anyone, but I had to put the  tag on this article.  Who made the comparison between this show and Dancing with the Stars?  Whoever did was wrong anyway: in my mind, Skating with Celebrities, another Fox show, is a better matchup to DWTS.--Desmond Hobson 16:56, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Is this show cancelled or coming back for another season? I don't think the article makes the status clear.  --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 22:30, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Tagged

message: Can someone find the songs performed by each contestant on each show, this would help expand the page.  Also any ratings information available out there?--Cooly123 17:08, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Song performed?
Talk:Languages of Germany

message: It would be great to have data about the use of German dialects such as Bavarian. Question 154 of the Mikrozensus asks what is the language spoken at home but I cannot find the answers to this question in the results. When could we find such information? A455bcd9 (talk) 14:08, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of German 'dialects' 

message: I'm German and I learned Latin as my first foreign language in secondary school from grade 5, English from grade 7 and French from grade 9. This was kind of normal back in my days - which means 30 years ago. Things are different today. It may be safely assumed that the "some cases" where Latin is taught before English are irrelevant today. Most elementary schools and even some kindergartens teach (basic) English nowadays. I don't want to change the article because maybe someone does know sources or statistics that prove me wrong, but I highly doubt it. --88.152.187.171 (talk) 11:09, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "in some cases, French or Latin are taught first."
Talk:Probation Service (England and Wales)

message: The article itself is well enough written, but lacks inline citations for all its items stated as facts. Rather than tag each individual item I have chosen to flag the whole article. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 21:16, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tagged to improve references 

message: The page gives a good (in my lay opinion) overview of the history of Probation in Britain and Northern Ireland, but then says very little about the current (2023) Probation Service.
In particular, the 'Criticism' section seems to solely address the privatised system which, as the start of the page says, ceased to exist in 2021.
Ministry (talk) 20:59, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Obsolete page?

message: I hope this doesn't sound like grammar pedantry, but this common error may be genuinely causing confusion!
In the statement:
...to rebalance sentencing in order to redress the drift towards less and less serious offences resulting in imprisonment or community sentences.
Does that mean:
* more offences that are categorised as less serious result in imprisonment or community sentences
or
* fewer offences that are categorised as serious result in imprisonment or community sentences?
Ministry (talk) 20:46, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Less or fewer?
Talk:James W. Walter Sr.

message: * "The last thing a man gives up is his home."
* "Bring me a picture of George Washington and I'll build you a house."
* "Don't give me no cheese; just let me out of this trap."
* "Buyers do not care about the interest rate. They only want to know if they can afford the payment."
* "Always leave some money on the table for the other guy"
* "I know the game is crooked, but its the only game in town [not original]"
None of these quotes are sourced, I searched for the G. Washington quote, and the only source I found was this wikipedia article.  
I have rarely put an article up for deletion, but this maybe my first one.  This article seems non-notable. RWV 17:00, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed quotes to talk
Talk:Technical University of Applied Sciences Lübeck

message: Well, the word is misspelled. It has to be "Umweltingenieurwesen" and means "Environmental Engineering". I will correct this.
Senpuu 20:08, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:House Order of Hohenzollern

message: Someone recently changed this page to reinsert this sentence, which I had deleted when I rewrote the article: "It was both a military and a civil award, with the addition of crossed swords to indicate a military award. It could only be awarded to commissioned officers (or civilians of approximately equivalent status)."
Crossed swords on the House Order of Hohenzollern did not "indicate a military award"; crossed swords indicated a wartime or combat award. This was not just the case with the House Order of Hohenzollern but also with most other Imperial German decorations (as well as the orders of a number of other European countries).  Military officers routinely received orders without swords for peacetime merit.  Take a look at the 1914 Prussian Army ranklist and one will see, for example, at least a dozen officers in Füsilier-Regiment Nr. 40, the regiment of the former Hohenzollern principalities, who have the Princely House Order of Hohenzollern without swords.  And one will find few officers above the rank of captain who do not have a Prussian Order of the Red Eagle or Crown Order, or both, without swords. These were commonly given as peacetime long service awards.  
12.145.108.11 01:08, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Swords on German orders 

message: Why is it stated on this website that the order is obsolete? To my knowledge the order still exists as a dynastic order, acknowledged as such throughout the world; sincerely not some sort of pseudo-order or fake order! See http://www.icocregister.org/list2002.htm. Demophon (talk) 11:51, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Still active order!
Talk:Joseph Payne Brennan

message: In the "Notable Work and Modern Influence" section, shouldn't the movie "The Blob" be named as having been influenced by the story (or possibly influenced by the story) "Slime"? Also, didn't Brennan sue the Blob's creators over that? I can't find a reference for that right now.
--BrianRO 17:08, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Zeng Jinlian

message: And what did she do? Why did she die? 37.5.208.114 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 07:26, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Personality

message: I followed Zeng's ordeal at the time and after her death the papers said she was 8'1¾" LONG; a length, which makes sense for a measurement after her death. If so, her standing height would have been less, about 7'10" or so. Therefore Jane Bunford remained the world's tallest woman ever.
Then a couple years later it was changed, in the media, to her height with normal spinal curvature, since she had scoliosis. What?! Anyone have the particulars?Mytg8 00:47, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The page on Jane Bunford notes that her measured height of 7'10" was also corrected due to her kyphoscoliosis, and that her standing height was 7'7". If that's the case, Zeng is still tallest (standing heights: Bunford 7'7", Zeng 7'10"; heights corrected for spinal curvature: Bunford 7'10", Zeng 8'1").  It's common practice with extremely tall people to measure length along the axis of the body (i.e. from the feet along the length of the spine to the top of the head) rather than standing height, simply because so many giants suffer from spinal deformity. John F. Carroll's page mentions this (he stood 8'0", but measured 8'7" in length), and John Rogan's standing height of 8'9" was impossible to measure until his death, simply because his severe ankylosis meant he was incapable of standing. Thefamouseccles 01:26, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Eight feet long or tall?

message: The text is the same as here
http://www.thetallestman.com/zengjinlian.htm
I don't which copied from which.JaneGrey (talk) 05:00, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: They copied from us based on their other "articles". Wizardman 04:58, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem 

message: Died age 16, table shows height age 17. Not a very accurate comparison...
118.90.77.107 (talk) 05:21, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Obvious error?