Talk:The Orchard (company)

message: The article was replaced by a cut and paste abotu the company taken from a press release.  It is both a copyvio, and introduces a POV bias into the article making look like an advertisement. I've reverted to an earlier version of the article. -- Whpq 15:24, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ironic. From the article: "The Orchard's YouTube multi-channel network has more than 1,000 channels across the globe and uses technology, built in-house, called B.A.C.O.N. (Bulk Automated Claiming on The Orchard Network) to crawl, claim and track YouTube videos to monetize for their clients..." This results in false copyright claims against musicians who have created their own music for youtube. A little reflection suggests that automated copyright claims without checking provenance is not a good idea. I am searching google for an authoritative source. Wastrel Way (talk) 20:30, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: This doesn't involve youtube but it is an example of the sneaky way that Orchard operates. In this case, the plaintiffs (B&B) created two albums and copyrighted them both, and all of the songs on them, and Orchard copied them and resold the copies. B&B won. It's not clear if they got an injunction. https://berschlerlaw.com/blog/2019/02/07/statutory-damages-claimed-for-copyright-infringement-of-songs/ Wastrel Way (talk) 20:47, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on The Orchard (company). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20151119064958/http://www.4entertainmentjobs.com/jobs/l/4entjob47500.html?utm_source=SimplyHired&utm_medium=organic&utm_campaign=SimplyHired to http://www.4entertainmentjobs.com/jobs/l/4entjob47500.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:14, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Intentionally tagged as checked=failed, because the bot took an archived 2015 snapshot consisting of a "job taken" message with no further info, the archived 2014 snapshot is the real thing for the reference in the infobox. Already fixed here, but I'm not volunteering to discuss this with the bot owner, visit phab: without login, or whatever else enwiki vs. WMF expect without offering a decent salary. –84.46.53.168 (talk) 21:16, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I propose merging the IODA and IRIS Distribution articles. SebastianWolff (talk) 18:09, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: See also the discussion at Talk:IODA (disambiguation)#Merge with The Orchard.  Klbrain (talk) 16:12, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  IODA/IRIS merge 

message: Listen, this company has falsely copyright claimed a YouTuber I watch named "EchartsLadder" who has permission from the creator and copyright owner. It is a horrible company and should be destroyed, as well as an investigation into Sony Music and The Orchard's employees. BruvGBruvington (talk) 18:59, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  This company should be liquidated.