Talk:The Cider House Rules (film)

message: Remolded the initial page so it focuses towards the novel The Cider House Rules, as opposed to the film. They're quite different (e.g., look up The War of the Worlds and see how many versions you get). Created this page for the film The Cider House Rules (film). Included some of the initial pro-life/anti-abortion arguments about the film in the controvery section. Kept it neutral. Poisonouslizzie September 30, 2005.
:I'd like to suggest maybe recombining the two articles into one. And the moment there is verbatim duplication of text, which is not very healthy for wikipedia. Tristanb 09:01, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Novel v. Film

message: :Image:Cider 1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 19:58, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Cider 1.jpg

message: It seems to me that the "rules" were a ref to the 10 commandments.  The charactors were commenting on the redundancies, "don't go up on the roof to read, don't go up to the roof to smoke".  Similar to thou shall not covet they neighbor's wife,,,house, ect.  Can anyone come up with a ref for this?  I think it would be an interesting comment in the article, if it can be documented. Steve kap (talk) 05:36, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I haven't seen the film for some time, but I would tend to disagree.  I seem to remember the film discussing that the list of rules was old, and no one remembered where it came from.  (Something like that.)  The whole film (to me...) is about not necessarily being bound by arbitrary rules, and this literal list of rules immediately reminded me of the 10 commandments.  Just because there were 6 instead of 10 doesn't rule it out.  (We can agree to disagree, but that's how I saw it.) Kingsfold (talk) 11:48, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Ten Commandments

message: This article contained a "controversy" section that made reference to a supposed "critic" John Prizer. I have deleted it. This critic is first and foremost not established, and more specifically not an established critic of American cinema. While this article may warrant a "controversy" section, it requires more reputable authors.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Christonajetski (talk • contribs) 06:12, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy Section 

message: At Dr Larch's funeral towards the end of the film, a prayer is read, I think by one of the nurses. It contains the phrase "fever of life", or "the fever that is life". Where can I find the full text of that prayer? Thanks. 79.138.155.9 (talk) 20:58, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prayer at funeral 

message: The "Plot" section says, "Later, when Arthur makes another attempt to rape his daughter, she stabs him..."  I just watched the film last night, and don't remember the rape attempt being mentioned, but just the stabbing and Rose's departure.  That may be what happened, but I don't think it should be mentioned here unless it's somehow mentioned or strongly implied in the movie.  Or did I miss it? yes you missed it — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.104.157.243 (talk) 13:36, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rape attempt? 

message: I am new to editing Wikipedia (constructively :P ) but I can't help but notice that some of the language seems to reflect the author's POV, which is apparently a no-no on Wikipedia.  For example, "Homer offers to help as only a doctor can."  What does he do exactly?  Does he perform an abortion?  Seems like quite the euphemism to me...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.84.216.182 (talk) 16:24, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I am not sure what the wording is meant to say, but you are welcome to change it to something more neutrally described. Erik II (talk | contrib) (ping me) 16:39, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutral Point of View? 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Cider House Rules (film) (film). Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Regards, SONIC678 19:29, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The Cider House Rules (film) (film)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]