lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Komagataella

message: It is claimed in a number of publications that P. pastoris is used for industrial protein production - but I have yet not found any explicit example. Can somebody help out on this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.96.53.198 (talk) 17:24, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Yes, indeed, P. pastoris has been used for industrial protein production. Here is one example, I was lazy to collect more, sorry:
http://www.springerlink.com/content/j482nwk77rj3103w/
just google: Pichia pastoris Phillips Petroleum and you may even add SCP. 
Have fun!Myrmeleon formicarius (talk) 18:48, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  re 

message: Most folk read it pee-she-a, while some read it Pee-key-a. Not that the etymology means much in how to pronounce it (no English speaker pronounces the ch in Escherichia as loch), but it may help folk decide. The internet says Hansen in 1904 named it after P. Pichi. As I don’t have the 1904 book I can’t guarantee it, but there it is. I tried searching in Italian for someone called Pietro or Paolo Pichi and combinations of "microbiologo XIX secolo” but only drew blanks. Assuming it is correct, the K version is more faithful to the Italian pronunciation.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.80.3.29 (talk) 05:46, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronounciation 

message: Recent articles indicate P. pastoris has been reclassified to Komagataella pastoris, eg. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19760441. This should probably be included in this article, though I don't know how to best reconcile it, especially because in practice, working biologists like myself still use the name Pichia despite it being deprecated. Scaldwell17 (talk) 21:28, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The page title should really be changed -- now to Komagataella phaffii, as I understand it. "But people know it better as ..." is always the case whenever there's a nomenclature change, and never an excuse for perpetuating an obsolete name. There are a couple of solutions: put Pichia pastoris in parentheses as a synonym in the lede, and include a hatnote saying "Pichia pastoris redirects here"; or treat "pichia pastoris" (or just "pichia"), lower-case roman, as an anglicized common name.  I think the former better reflects the actual state of affairs, but I wouldn't be violently opposed to the latter.  Opinions? Gould363 (talk) 03:04, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Went ahead and done that. I opted for the long lead graph approach: it's ugly, but making a species the synonym of a whole genus in the infobox feels wrong. (Yes, technically the synonym only applies to K. pastoris, but you then ignore everything they peeled off from it. The six other species, including the industrially important phaffii.) Artoria2e5 🌉 06:41, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Komagataella pastoris?
Talk:Members of the Tasmanian House of Assembly, 2006–2010

message: Isn't it a bit soon?  Some candidates' positions are as yet unknown, and in any case the new parliament won't be sworn in for several weeks. -- Chuq (talk) 10:23, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The members change from the date of the election. It's actually backdated so that even the ones we aren't sure about yet will have technically been members from 20 March. So the members who retired - Napier, Cox, Hodgman, etc. - have most certainly concluded their terms, while those definitely defeated - both Butlers, Hulme, Singh, Sturges - have also ceased to be MHAs. Frickeg (talk) 11:32, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The ones I changed on the 20th itself were announced on the ABC page as having retired (did not contest), and Singh, Hulme and Sturges have all conceded. Orderinchaos 13:05, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I wasn't aware of this!  Does this mean we should be editing Hodgman's article to state he is Premier? -- Chuq (talk) 22:29, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No, because he isn't yet. (This happened over at Alan Carpenter back at the 2008 WA election, when it took 17 days between when the election was held and when the premier was sworn in.) However, premiers' terms are actually commissions and do not expire until their resignation (even if they lose their seat! - JH was still PM until 3 Dec 2007 even though his term as MP had concluded on 24 Nov and he had failed to be reelected) so David Bartlett is still in every legal sense the Premier of Tasmania and all his ministers remain sworn in, whereas politicians' terms expire at each election and they need to win them back at election. So with a premier, positive proof of resignation (i.e. a gazettal or somesuch) is needed to end their term. With a politician, positive proof of victory is needed to continue their term. However, to save time as most politicians do in fact retain their seats and early counting generally reveals some certainties, we tend to mark a whole heap present at the start anyway then close them off as defeats are announced. Orderinchaos 00:06, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah right. Our crazy political system!  I'm glad someone here knows how it works! :)  -- Chuq (talk) 02:48, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changing "-present" to "-2010"
Talk:Rockaway Beach Branch

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.yangforny.com/policies/parks-and-open-space?utm_source=Yang+For+New+York&utm_campaign=32bc52bdac-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_1_13_2021_17_58_COPY_01&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_f7f1a38e93-32bc52bdac-391063044. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Epicgenius (talk) 16:35, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Robinson Crusoe (1954 film)

message: Oh god, it's terrible. That is all. Robin J Thomson (talk) 18:27, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed my mind. Robin J Thomson (talk) 19:08, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  It's terrible.
Talk:4-Aminophenol

message: […] it is commonly used as a developer in black-and-white film, marketed under the name Rodinal.
As far as i know the active ingredient in Rodinal is 4-aminophenol chloride (see http://www.digitaltruth.com/data/rodinal.php). There is any verifiable ref for the above statement?Atelierelealbe (talk) 14:10, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Good catch. For many articles on amines, we don't carefully distinguish the degree of protonation when it comes to commercial formulations, probably because we don't know those details.  So I think that the current statement is probably ok.  The redox properties of the amino phenol would however be affected rather strongly.--Smokefoot (talk) 15:02, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Different compound?

message: 4-Aminophenol is a chemical compound. It is a breakdown product of paracetamol.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Joknee (talk • contribs).
It is also used for the synthesis of paracetamol. This is a common experiment in university level organic chemistry classes. Fuzzform 22:48, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Chemical compound

message: Looks like duplicate articles: Aminophenol and 4-aminophenol. Bobjgalindo (talk) 14:20, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed now. Physchim62 (talk) 19:32, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge_proposal

message: Anyone know where that pKa came from? http://research.chem.psu.edu/brpgroup/pKa_compilation.pdf gives it as 10.3.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danielthechemist (talk • contribs) 21:17, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: It is listed at 4.5 in "pKa Data Compiled by R. Williams", a down-loaded pdf of which many seem to be using for organic acids and bases.  10.3 is perhaps the pKb. --Smokefoot (talk) 00:40, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: no, it is listed as 10.3.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danielthechemist (talk • contribs) 15:20, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  pKa
Talk:Chilean destroyer Aldea

message: Some sources, eg , give name as Aldea. What source(s) for Alden? Folks at 137 10:27, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Aldea or Alden
Talk:Flat-twelve engine

message: There has been a suggestion that :flat 12 engine be merged with :Flat-12 page, but I see that no one has discussed this yet.
:Support - The pages are obviously about the same thing. The :flat 12 engine page doesn't seem to add any additional value to Wikipedia and the Flat-12 name is consitant with the :Flat-4, :Flat-6 and :Flat-8 pages. The :flat 12 engine page should be changed to a redirect. --Xagent86 (Talk | contribs) 10:33, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I added the info from the :flat 12 engine page - mainly about the :Jiotto Caspita - and since no-one else seems to object to the merge, the pages should be merged. --Xagent86 (Talk | contribs) 12:10, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge is now complete. --Xagent86 (Talk | contribs) 12:33, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestion that [[:flat 12 engine]] be merged with [[:Flat-12]] page

message: A works drawing of the Ferrari 'boxer' crank, confirming that it isn't a boxer engine.   Andy Dingley (talk) 22:25, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Berlinetta Boxer and the non-boxer engine 

message: According to its own Wikipedia article, the Subaru 1235 F1 engine, also mentioned in this article, was a Boxer engine, not a flat 12 with shared crank journals for opposing pistons. Does anyone have more information on this engine?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lolle42 (talk • contribs) 14:25, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subaru 1235 - Flat twelve oder Boxer?
Talk:Wolstonbury Hill

message: The iron fort subsection is rather garbled and it's not obvious what refers to what. Hope someone who knows about the hill can help.--A bit iffy 10:47, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: Wolstonbury Hill is a little further from Brighton than 4km. More like 12km.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.147.39.31 (talk) 18:50, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distance from Brighton
Talk:Saul Goodman (percussionist)

message: "Saul Goodman was a timpanist in the New York Philharmonic orchestra from 1926 to 1972."
From 1926? that can´t be correct. This guy is never 81 years old!
:It's correct.  He was hired by the NYP when he was 19 (the youngest ever member, if I recall correctly).  He was born in 1907 and died in 1996.  --Nethgirb 11:04, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Template talk:Great Power diplomacy

message: I've tried to keep this reasonably concise, as I dislike huge sprawling templates. However, there's a lot that could be reasonably added. I may work in the US, the Ottomans, Japan and China, depending on what people think.--Nydas(Talk) 11:19, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes

message: I feel like Turkey should be added to this template. Despite the fact that they were a power in decline they were nevertheless a Great Power that remained highly involved with the international politics of the time. In addition they held colonies in Africa during the scramble (In Libya), and were a major part of the alliance system that led to the Great War. The fact that the template heavily features wars and international events that involve the Ottomans is even more reason for them to be included among the Great Powers on this list.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.203.152.167 (talk) 22:19, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Ottomans 

message: Hi, The great game is reported twice. --Luckyz (talk) 13:43, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  The great game 

message: Why isn't the Crimean War linked in "War?" Jkrick77 (talk) 04:17, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crimean War in "War?"
Talk:Electoral division of Rosevears

message: Unnecessary fork of parent article -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:43, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose, as structurally the Australian articles have separate electoral results and electoral divisions pages, and this seems to work for readers. For example, in Tasmania, the 13 articles in :Category:Tasmanian Legislative Council periodic election results by division. If you'd like to make a widespread change, feel free to start an omnbibus discussion tagging the set of articles within the subdirectories of :Category:Electoral results in Australia. Klbrain (talk) 18:37, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Electoral results for the Division of Rosevears]] into [[Electoral division of Rosevears]]
Talk:Live sound mixing

message: I've tagged this page as POV due to phrases such as The efforts of the Front of House engineer often go unnoticed when the sound is good due to the fact that a well mixed show will sound natural to the general public and will not sound like anything is being done other than simple amplification of the music on stage, which is not at all the only thing going on.
and It is truly a field that is often overlooked by the general public... making it look like the work of a disgruntled sound engineer who feels underappreciated! Dancarney (talk) 12:42, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 

message: Why was the Monitor Engineer pic moved to the top of the page?  It is conflicting with the cleanup tag and also makes less sense, in my opinion, for it to be away from the section explaining the role of the monitor engineer.  I'll move it back in a few days if no objection is raised.  Thanks. --PM - PhilyG talk 23:09, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Monitor Engineer Picture

message: Its the same thing.  Why have two articles on it? --24.34.174.143 (talk) 20:10, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a result of the 3 way split of the Audio Mixing article.  I say merge it into the new article as the new one from the split has hardly any info in it right now.--PM - PhilyG talk 22:41, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done   DJSparky     huh? 03:16, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal

message: — Assignment last updated by Ceiap (talk) 20:39, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: 20th-21st Century Art, Performance and Media
Talk:Danton (1983 film)

message: No clue why such attention is given in the intro paragraphs to Ann Alvaro. She is an excessively minor character with very few lines; the movie spends far more time following Robespierre, played by Wojciech Pszoniak, than it does her. This is based on a Danton-Robespierre play, not an Eleonore-Danton play (they do not exist). Danton-Robespierre plays are a feature of theater based on the French Revolution, and the binary clash of personalities characterizes this movie as much as it does Buchner's 'Danton's Death' or any other play on the subject. Eleonore is an even smaller role in this film than she is in the play. I'm not certain why that bit part is being given much attention at all, particularly in the intro paragraph.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.170.241.160 (talk) 00:04, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

message: What a dreadfully poor article, which is not only littered with elementary linguistic errors ("has just rode in" - "the reason .... is because" - et j'en passe, as the French say), but also because there si absolutely no mention of the contemporary political significance of this magnificent film. Can you not see the subversive element of this film the way in which it cast Robespierre as Jarizelski and Danton as Lech Walesa and the Gdansk shipyard trade unionists? I despair.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.170.192.137 (talk) 22:27, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poor article - must do better 

message: I hesitate to change the following sentence (see under Plot):
"Danton is a friend and old colleague of Robespierre, and doesn’t want to execute him".
I am wondering if it was supposed to be something like this:
"Danton is a friend and old colleague of Robespierre, who doesn’t want to execute him"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.63.16.82 (talk) 16:53, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are you sure it shouldn't be the other way around? 

message: Hey, hey, hey! Why is the article calling Eleonore Duplay Robespierre's mistress (the last passage)? It is a disputable issue, so maybe it would be much better to just use her name there.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.132.160.120 (talk) 20:48, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mistress?
Talk:Cumpăna

message: There's something wrong here, since "Excursion agricole" was written in 1850.Anonimu 11:29, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Giuliana Marino

message: There have been two links on this page that were supposedly her MySpace profile:
http://www.myspace.com/giulianamarino and http://www.myspace.com/130527112
No more links to any MySpace page should be added until a published source is cited. --Pixelface 19:50, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: And we should just take your word for it?  I don't think so.  Rglovejoy 13:52, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

text: That http://www.myspace.com/giulianamarino looks like the legit one. Rglovejoy 16:42, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: MySpace
Talk:2007 Turks and Caicos Islands general election

message: What's Amanda Misick's political affiliation? The source lists her as PNP but the candidate lists show Cheryl Tull as the PNP candidate and that Amanda was an Independent candidate, did she cross over when she won? Mikebloke 11:45, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Amanda Misick's Political Affiliation?
Template talk:WikiProject Bristol

message: This template 'eats' any that follow it. See for example Talk:Coombe Dingle, and also try replacing the  with any other template. I don't know how to unpick the conditional nightmare that is the template, but I hope perhaps the author can. (Incidentally, that  needs to go from Talk:Coombe Dingle; I've left it there as an example for the time being). Splash - tk 16:09, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've reverted the template back to a previous working version. My attempt at being clever obviously didn't work! — Gasheadsteve Talk to me 16:23, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks; is a pity the template 'comes free with' so much gubbins in it. Still, since it never gets subst'ed onto talk pages, it's no big deal. Splash - tk 19:28, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem with template
Talk:John Doe (Seven)

message: All seven of the Deadly Sins was covered by the film, but only six of them were punished by death. The gluttenous man was force fed until he exploded; the greedy man was bled to death from a wound he was made to cut; the slothful man was tortured for a year, but kept alive in agony; the lustful woman had her genitals sliced up with a knife; the proud woman was marred, suiciding out of shame; and the envious man was shot by the very man he admired. As John Doe put it "every sin was turned against the sinner". But what of wrath? Detective Mills had his wife and unborn child murdered. This was his primary motivation for killing Doe, but was it also his punishment? Was the punishment of wrath to have your love ones die, while you remain alive in brooding hatred? Is wrath itself the punishment? Either way, Mills was the only sinner to remain alive. This needs to be adressed in the analysis and discussion of Doe's article. It is a fundemental aspect in interpreting his "masterpiece", and understanding him as one of literature's most interesting villains. I have have 3 theories on the matter: (1) that living in wrath is a greater punishment than death; (2) that Mill's was punished by the death of his loved ones; or (3) Mill's will be so shattered that he will commit suicide. I think the third theory is the most likely. --Dark_Wolf101 12:02, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The Murder of Wrath

message: Was the prostitute really a sinner, at least in the extreme circumstances that John Doe's other victims were. She was killed by having her genitals sliced up (from the inside) by the blade of a knife, wielded by her client at the orders of Doe. She was killed because she commited the sin of lust. But ironically, it was her client, the man who paid to have sex with her, that was lustful. She was, in effect, only doing her job, and it is doubtful that she harboured any physical attractions to her clients. Yet, she was selected by Doe for brutal murder. This lends credibility to the idea that Doe possessed a level of mysogonism; blaming the woman for luring innocent men into her lair to be corrupted. This aspect of Doe's killings should probably be explored in this article. --Dark_Wolf101 12:03, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Still, he didn't seem to show any other sign of misogyny apart from this, and even then it is debatable whether his act was truly sexist. Although he did seem to blame the prostitute personally for tempting men, near the end of the film he referred to her as a "disease spreading whore", but I don't recall him showing any hatred of women in general. 66.24.235.78 23:30, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Innocence of Lust? 

message: Don't delete it.
Cmon 
:Why don't you want this article deleted? WadeSimMiser (talk) 00:12, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cmon 

message: Erm... doesnt the guy who wrote this what the "John Doe" name stands for?. It's not like his mother calls him Johnathan Francis Doe when she is mad, John Doe means that he is unidentified.--99.192.63.121 (talk) 17:39, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Johnathan Doe?
Template talk:Christian Brothers schools in Australia

message: There were two links to St leo's, one of which led (after recent changes) to a dab page at St. Leo's College.  As far as I can see there's only the one CB school, at St. Leo's Catholic College, Wooranga, so I've amended the template. PamD (talk) 08:40, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  St Leo's
Talk:British–Irish Parliamentary Assembly

message: Guess which country is massively under-represented in this talking shop? Well, it could only be England, because any of the others would kick up a fuss and storm out if they didn't get "fair" representation. So England, with over 75% of the combined population, ends up with a very fair maximum of 25 delegates out of 68! (Less any of the Members of the UK Parliament who aren't English - probably quite a few). LukeHoC 12:05, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Anti-English bias

message: Until evidence can be provided as to whether Cornwall was given membership or not, the piece on the attempt to gain membership should remain. Bodrugan (talk) 16:03, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cornwall 

message: I've read the article but I am none the wiser as to the real need for this assembly. It would be helpful if a clearer definition were provided, rather than this vague representation. I'm sure I'm not alone in being oblivious of its existance until I came upon the name quite by chance. Would I be wrong in assuming it was the brainchild of the Irish - to further facilitate their exploitation of the UK market and interfere in British politics?; yet another example of the paddy 5th column in Britain?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.78.242.184 (talk) 19:30, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's The Point?