Talk:Click (2006 film)

message: In the Trivia section, that last item about the boss character comparing his secretaries' feet- I don't see how that is trivia sincei ts dialogue and is obvious. Movie trivia generally consists of things that aren't immediately obvious. That said, I think that the name of Sandler's character, Mike Newman, might be a reference to the fact that he becomes a "new man" after he wakes up. Obviously its also fitting because Newman is a Jewish last name and the character is Jewish, but I think that that name was probably chosen for the other reason that I mentioned. -Random Guy
:I went ahead and removed the trivia item about comparing the feet.  It wasn't an interesting fact you might otherwise not know, it was simply a scene in the movie, and an unimportant scene at that. --Phantom784 17:01, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Not if Quentin had directed it, then it would have been a calling card.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.113.80.189 (talk) 01:21, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe that if it's based off of anything it'd be the Twlight Zone episode, since it's older.  And that idea is hardly original, since I'm sure many people have had the idea, documented or not.  It'd be hard to trace a source since it probably has no specific one. Fllmtlchcb 09:50, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

text: As soon as Sandler's character's life started getting screwed up, I knew it was going to have to end Deus Ex Machina, which in my opinion is one of the cheesiest ways to solve a plot conflict.  --Phantom784 17:03, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Unless we get official word on it, don't say this movie is based on anything. Sure, it's not completely original, but the same could be said for almost every major release from the last five years. And please sign your comments.--Agent Aquamarine 03:10, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stuff 

message: What's the name of the song that plays at then end of the trailer #2 at www.adamsandler.com?
:1st: Wikipedia is NOT a Forum. Try asking questions in places like Yahoo answers. 2nd: Sign your posts by four tildes N.samimi island (talk) 16:46, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adam Sandler.com Trailer song 

message: A proper plot section with "spoiler" alert would be good.
Aaron 15:03, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot 

message: I thought Click took place in these years:
*1976
*1994
*2006
*2007
*2017
*2021
*2023
*2029
205.188.117.69 00:44, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Years 

message: Links to two Portuguese versions of this page are given to the left of the article, however one of them links to a page called "KNOB!!!". I would remove it but don't know how. Fantom 25th October 2006 12:45 GMT
:Fixed. Ariel. 05:00, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Portuguese 

message: How come under the trivia it says " Michael, driving to his house in 2017, hears a radio report saying that 'Britney Spears has had her 23rd baby today and Kevin Federline has announced that he will find a job.' which after the DVD release of the film was found to be untrue." What was found to be untrue? Colin Reding 23:01, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I would assume that because the movie was filmed and produced at the end of 2005 and beginning of 2006, Britney and Kevin were still together. Since that time they have divorced. AussieNickuss 10:57, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  There is nothing to suggest that BS & KF won't get back together & re-marry by 2017 :) Kixy 10:31, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  I don't understand 

message: No way is that true, unless it is referring to DVD's, as I saw the film a while ago, September possibly, maybe august, in the cinema, any kind of thoughts on this? NickBrett 10:36, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  UK release dates. 

message: Maybe it's just me, but I absolutely despise the fact that the first sentence of the article reads "Click is a 2006 Academy Award-nominated... film." While the sentence is technically correct, it's incredibly misleading. Yes, it is Oscar-nominated... it was nominated for one Oscar, for makeup, and generally got bad reviews. I'm not going to change it myself, as the information is (again, technically) factual, but I hope I'm not the only person who feels this way. I would support mentioning the Oscar nom in the lead, but not in the first damn sentence. (For the record, I've never seen the film, so it's not as if I have some personal vendetta against it.) -- Kicking222 21:38, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm, I don't think my feelings are as strong as you are, but I understand where you're coming from. Maybe you have too much faith in the Academy Award nominations. What if it actually wins, would that mean something more? It's still just a makeup award. It's going up against a foreign film (which the Academy isn't too fond of, and another with a lot of makeup, but nothing spectacular. It might win.) McKay 22:20, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

text: It's similar to calling yourself a lottery winner when the jackpot was < $1,000,000. --Meadowbrook 01:50, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: FYI, this is still pissing me off. I'm going to change it so that the article does not lead with the nomination. If anyone hates the change that much, feel free to revert it- I promise you, I won't feel personally slighted. -- Kicking222 23:13, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Academy Award-nominated"

message: Does anyone notice when samantha says "Daddy,Sundance,s wrestling his duck again!" he,s really having SEX!? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.157.16.125 (talk) 20:20, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Funny as Hell!!! 

message: :Image:Click remote.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:34, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Click remote.png

message: It says that this is like the 21st Century It's a wonderful life. This I do not dispute. Then, it implies that it is a remake of It's a Wonderful Life. However, that is not a correct conclusion. High School Musical has been called a "21st century Grease", but to consider it a remake is absurd. This is no different. If nobody objects within a reasonable time, I will remove the line concerning Adam sandler and the remakes. Smartyllama (talk) 12:56, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "21st Century It's a wonderful life" 

message: This is very POV, and I am removing it for the time being. S♦s♦e♦b♦a♦l♦l♦o♦s (Merry Christmas!) 12:10, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Critical Reactions section 

message: :Image:Click film.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 21:25, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Click film.jpg

message: I'll be editing the snyopsis so we can remove the too long tag on it.  I'll try not to get rid of anything important to the story and just cut out the fluff.  --Banime (talk) 17:47, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Synopsis 

message: The following is unsourced information:
*Rob Schneider makes a cameo as Prince Habeeboo (in makeup) in the beginning of the movie.  Schneider appears in most of Sandler's films and vice versa. In a deleted scene from the DVD, Prince Habeeboo says "you can do it," a phrase often said by Schneider in cameo appearances in other Adam Sandler films. It was cut, presumably due to time constraints. He is not credited for the role.
*The camping trip was at Lake Winnipesaukee (though it was filmed in northern California). This is an actual lake in New Hampshire. Adam Sandler was raised in Manchester, New Hampshire. Lake Winnipesaukee is also referenced in Sandler's "Thanksgiving Song."
*The film was shot using the high-definition Genesis (Panavision) camera.
*Drew Barrymore was originally set to play the role of Donna Newman, but later dropped out because of a scheduling conflict and because she had already worked with Adam Sandler twice. Lauren Graham was also offered the role, but turned it down because she was going to shoot the sixth season of Gilmore Girls during the time that Click was going to go into production.
*The wig that Sandler wears during the flashback scene of Michael's first kiss with Donna is a reference to Sandler's character Robbie Hart from the 1998 classic comedy "The Wedding Singer."
*Eric Lamonsoff, an off-screen character referenced in this and other Sandler films, was Adam Sandler's college roommate.
*Sandler's on-screen name, Michael Newman, is a reference to David Hasslehoff's old costar Michael Newman in Baywatch.
*The singer at Ben's wedding in 2030 was Dolores O'Riordan, the lead singer of the Cranberries in real life, who ironically is the band that sang Michael and Donna's song, Linger (song).
*The character who Jennifer Coolidge portrays in the movie is named Janine, Coolidge also portrayed a character named Janine in the "American Pie" series of films (this is a reference to her iconic character).
While this is interesting, we can't use it unless you provide a source. Also, none of this is really trivia, as trivia by its definition is "unimportant information" - it therefore shouldn't be in a trivia section but instead the information should be incorporated into the main article. - Tbsdy lives (talk) 11:08, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced material 

message: Should we add the functions of the click remote? It would be great to have one. I was able to get some information of some character's birthdates based on the movie credits,etc.
1. Michael Newman
*Birthdate: 1966
*Age: 40, 51 in 2017, 57 in 2023, and 64 in 2030 
*Occupation: architect
2.Donna ? Newman
*Birthdate: around 1976
*Age: About 30, 41 in 2017, 47 in 2023, and 54 in 2030  
*Occupation: stay-at-home parent
3.Samantha Newman
*Birthdate: 2003
*Age: 5, 14 in 2017, 20 in 2023, and 27 in 2030.   
*Occupation: ?
4.Benjamin "Ben" Newman
*Birthdate: 1999
*Age: 7, 18 in 2017, 24 in 2023, and 31 in 2030.
*Occupation: Architect
Also, I figured out the Delete function. According to the poster, you can delete objects and remove them from existance. For example, you can sneek to the toll booth and delete all of the tickets so you won't have to pay for the Golden Gate bridge passing. - Rockmandrum (talk) 05:18, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Click Info

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 00:07, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Freedom tower.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: Isn't anyone going to mention that this entire movie is based on a book of the Goosebumps series? --Sage94 (talk) 03:50, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have a reliable source for that? - SummerPhD (talk) 03:53, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Could I use Wikia as a reliable source? --Sage94 (talk) 07:15, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: User edited sites are useless as they are in the same boat we are: subject to simple mistakes and outright vandalism. If, however, the Wikia article cites a source you might check that source to see if it is reliable (and supports the information). - SummerPhD (talk) 15:02, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Trivia

message: Why isn't there a Click 2? --182.190.243.193 (talk) 13:02, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I can think of about $250 million reasons Sandler has plenty of other offers and does not need to do sequels unless he really wants to, and most people who like his films will watch whatever comedy he does next if they want more of the same. It also depends on who actually owns the movie If it was not written by Tim Herlihy and Adam Sandler, like this film, they don't own it and a sequel is significantly less likely. -- 109.76.211.200 (talk) 10:30, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is there a reason