lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Eisenstein on Disney

message: What is the "Grund-Problem"? I'm guessing it has to do rationality (from the German), but really I haven't a clue.--Ethicoaestheticist 23:44, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The Grund Problem

message: How about some citations in the text? 
Timothy Perper (talk) 15:20, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Text citations?
Talk:Aemilia Lepida

message: I know some of the subsequent articles might be stubby, but I can't see any practical use of keeping this one largish article about several different women instead of a disambiguation to several, more orderly looking articles?  Ford MF 21:53, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It should, but I am afraid that others might disagree. Let's wait for a week and see what others say about this. Some of the women have their own articles; others don't. The problem I encountered was too many Aemilia Lepidas in Roman imperial history! wikibiohistory 16:06, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Shouldn't this be a disambiguation page?

message: The heading "Aemilia Lepida (executed 20)" is followed with a text that end with her being exiled. What is correct?´
213.67.241.199 (talk) 14:57, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Exiled or executed?
Talk:North Central Airlines

message: "company executives decided to start an airline and charge people money to fly." — Isn't that what all airlines do? Sca 17:23, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed; fixed. --Orange Mike 12:57, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What's an airline?

message: If the FWD company started the airline in the 40's then why are all the dates getting switched to the 50's. -Marcusmax(speak)  03:22, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates?? 

message: I remember a NCA plane crashing in Kalamazoo back in the 70's.  will find more. Gtwfan52 (talk) 19:37, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crash in Kalamazoo.
Talk:Phraates IV

message: For some reason Kenneth Quinn (3 times at least in Horace The Odes) insists on calling him Prahates (sic). Something to  look into? Vince Calegon (talk) 16:37, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  spelling of name? 

message: There are quite a few cites with "journal" parameter missing in  (:Category:CS1 errors: missing periodical). Also, "Bringmann 2007" does not have a corresponding entry in the bibliography (:Category:Harv and Sfn multiple-target errors). Renata (talk) 04:20, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Dangit, what do I have to add to my common.js to see these missing journal parameters? --HistoryofIran (talk) 11:26, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  I have .citation-comment {display: inline !important;} in my common.css. Help:CS1_errors#Controlling_error_message_display has different codes. Renata (talk) 23:25, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I see, thanks! --HistoryofIran (talk) 01:10, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Cite errors
Talk:Artabanus III (of Parthia)

message: I have renamed this article on the Norwegian (bokmål) wiki (from II to III) according to the logic on English wiki. Hopefully English wiki is correct to follow... I have noticed that this name have caused some confusions amoung the different wikies. French have the same picture of a coin on two articles Artaban II and Artaban III. Are we absolutly sure we are right? Parthia.com do use II: Artabanus II (c. A.D. 10 - 38) --Finn Bjørklid (talk) 22:09, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  II or III? 
Talk:Pixodarus

message: That's a pretty big error  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.144.34.210 (talk) 22:30, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arrhidaeus was no Illegitimate 

message: This article appears to conflict and contradict information contained in the Ada of Caria article... Are there any better sources than the mid-19th Century? Stevenmitchell (talk) 22:21, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Article in Historical Conflict with Ada of Caria
Talk:Caenis

message: Grufo changed the text without changing the source, which is problematic. Because the sources say "concubine" (I checked some of them), whereas Grufo changed the text to say contubernalis (which I did not find in the sources used). If it is desired for text to be changed to something else then new sources have to be provided.VR talk 05:57, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changing text without changing source
Talk:Clutorius Priscus

message: Cassius Dio in 57.3 and Tacitus in 3.49 calls the man "Gaius Lutorius Priscus" (one of the few times Tacitus actually provides the full name of somebody obscure). Could the title Clutorius Priscus be the mistaken spelling of "C. Lutorius Priscus"? I understand modern authors, such as Levick here, have made the mistake of "Clutorius", but I don't think it's correct. William Smith in DGRBM also has him as "Gaius Lutorius Priscus".
"C. (for Gaius) Lutorius Priscus" is correct. How modern scholars mess up is anybody's guess, maybe misreading their own notes. Badgerexpat (talk) 21:08, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:James Percy FitzPatrick

message: The capitalisation is inconsistent - is it FitzPatrick or Fitzpatrick? Greenman (talk) 12:52, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Capitalisation
Talk:Publius Cornelius Scipio Nasica Corculum

message: I have a question about the reversion of the good-faith edit (as described by the editor who reverted)
This is what I added, after searching William Smith's Dictionary online
"However, the marriage apparently took place around 184-183 BC, in the lifetime of her father Scipio Africanus.William Smith (1870). Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology, says of Cornelia: "The elder daughter of P. Scipio Africanus the elder, was married in her father's life-time to P. Scipio Nasica. (Liv. xxxviii. 57 ; Polyb. xxxii. 13.)" " 
The reference was as follows: "William Smith (1870). Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology, says of Cornelia: "The elder daughter of P. Scipio Africanus the elder, was married in her father's life-time to P. Scipio Nasica. (Liv. xxxviii. 57 ; Polyb. xxxii. 13.)" <"
This was not found acceptable, but my earlier unsourced assertations were.  I am therefore quite puzzled.  If Smith is unacceptable as a source for Roman history, please let me know.
wikibiohistory 18:49, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I am equally puzzled. So much of early Roman history is "probable" that we have little choice other than to reflect that. You appear to have done your best to source things properly. Moreschi  Talk 19:23, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: This is yet another Scipio article featuring a bust or statue which is unlikely to be them.  There is no primary source for this identification and certainly no consensus among historians.  One historian's conjecture (assuming they did actually state what is claimed) should not justify linking the image.  See also the articles for Scipio Aemilianus  and Lucius Aemilius Paullus Macedonicus.  These misleading images, prominently positioned as they are, bring the credibility of the Scipio articles - if not Wikipedia in general - into question. Ljredux (talk) 10:43, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misleading busts and statues associated with Scipio articles.
Talk:Publius Decius Mus (consul 312 BC)

message: I think the image of Rubens' painting needs to be removed as it is representing not Decimus Mus, the consul of 312, but rather his father of the same name, consul of 340.
Sources: 
https://libmma.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/collection/p15324coll10/id/90383
https://www.liechtensteincollections.at/en/collections-online/decius-mus-relating-his-dream Sfzeller (talk) 15:52, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove image of Rubens' painting
Talk:Empress Zhangde

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 20:13, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Pocket Pool

message: #The article was copy/pasted from [www.gamespot.com/psp/sports/pocketpool/news.html?sid=6165411 here]
#The article is not an encyclopedia article
#The article does not contain verified facts
#The article is little but an ad
#The article does not assert notability, and I doubt notability can be asserted
But having labelled it for deletion once with what seemed the most obvious problem, only to have someone remove the entire delete tag since they didn't think it was spam, although it clearly wasn't an article worth keeping, I'm not sure what to do. I've removed the copied text, which didn't belong anyway, but now wonder whether I should have left it so I could have tagged the article as a copy vio. But I'm loath to look like I'm edit-warring. Skittle 23:59, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it's over a month later and no one's died.  This article is a steam pile, but with all the cleanup tags I slapped on it maybe someone will work on it. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont]  ‹(-¿-)› 23:34, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Massive problems
Talk:Empress Wang (Ping)

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 19:52, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Diffuser (thermodynamics)

message: Is a diffuser ever referred to as an "evasee?" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.197.115.4 (talk) 23:59, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is it okay to think there're two definitions for diffuser?
One, probably more strict and precise one, is that "any duct designed to slow an incoming gas flow to lower velocity at the exit of the diffuser" (quoted from Fundamentals of Aerodynamics, 3rd ed., J. D. Anderson, Jr. (2001), p.577). Another is perhaps "any duct where its cross sectional area is increasing" or something like this.
They have the same divergent shape for subsonic flows, whereas for supersonic flows quite the opposite: any convergent duct is a diffuser for supersonic flows by the former difinition. Of course the inversed thing can be said for nozzle.
I'm saying this 'cos I was a bit confused while I was reading Expansion chamber#Transfer where it says "This part of the pipe is called the divergent (or diffuser) section". I have had the impression that the flow at the part usually becomes supersonic; if so the article uses the second definition... Or, merely the flow's subsonic? --Dynamicsoar 14:31, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  two definitions for diffuser?
Talk:Rolo to the Rescue

message: There must be more information for this game!
It also had one ofthe msot depressing endings ever if you didnt complete EVERY SINGLE LEVEL freeing all the animals
it went something like "And you are never happy again" THANK YOU FOR SUCH A LOVELY ENDING i cried when i was a kid and got that ending
---
I added YouTube video links to both the good and bad endings. Also there is a photo of the box art of the game below, it would be good to have with the article.
http://img367.imageshack.us/img367/3533/roloboxac3.jpg
-LimeiBook86
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
*  
*  (alt link)
* 
*  (alt link)
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
*  
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
Research thanks to  and others who I may have missed. I moved the list here so that it wont get archived.Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 14:10, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sadyattes

message: I deleted the following from this article:
Herodotus wrote (in Inquiries) that he fought with Cyaxares, the descendant of Deioces, and with the Medes, drove out the Cimmerians from Asia, took Smyrna, which had been founded by colonists from Colophon, and invaded Clazomenae and Miletus.
As far as I can see from Herodotus' text (section 16), this info rather pertains to Sadyattes' son Alyattes II.
OMHalck (talk) 11:30, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed info
Talk:Impenitent thief

message: Per discussion there. So yes, this stub does have the same problem... multiple names from different apocryphal religious traditions. In ictu oculi (talk) 04:35, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreeing with common sense WP:move by User:St Anselm. In ictu oculi (talk) 12:26, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: See [[Talk:Saint Dismas]]

message: If it is the majority view of mainstream Bible scholars, then it is good enough for Wikipedia. Tgeorgescu (talk) 17:16, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Majority view
Talk:Simeon ben Shetach

message: According to History of the Re-established Sanhedrin, Shimon ben Shetach served not as Nasi but as Av Beis Din, alongside Yehudah ben Tavai, who served as Nasi. Anomalocaris 00:11, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Shimon was Av Beit Din, but under Joshua ben Perachya; when Joshua died Shimon became nasi. Briangotts (Talk) (Contrib) 17:51, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nasi? 

message: How do people use a formula prescribed by the Talmud in the 1st century BC? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2a02:c7f:9e3a:d000:bc80:5f71:f7c2:14b6 (talk • contribs) 
: The Talmud only recorded the custom, which was in place long before that. Debresser (talk) 21:14, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fairness anecdote
Talk:Liu Yan (Xin dynasty)

message: I think the correction pronounciation of 縯 is yǐn, not yan.
However, it seemed widely mispronounced as Yan, for some reason.
Anyone knows more about this?
Snowybeagle (talk) 06:41, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yin is the archaic pronunciation, which is preserved in Cantonese and other dialects. Most modern scholars use the modern pronunciation Yan. -Zanhe (talk) 19:52, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct pronounciation of 縯
Talk:Sitalces

message: Two issues here. First, such high numbers are at best dubious, and need strong support - and ancient Greek sources frequently exaggerate 'barbarian' numbers. Second, "warriors" is ambiguous at best, and can mean anything from tribal militia to mercenary soldiers. 173.66.211.129 (talk) 15:17, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  150,000 warriors?
Talk:Difference theory

message: Alright, let's be serious for a minute here. The difference theory is probably the biggest academic cop out I've ever seen. To claim that language is utilized exactly the same for males and females would be to claim that males and fermales are exactly the same, and think exactly the same. Whether you are sexist or not this topic is simply common sense. Do males and females think exactly the same? No, of course not. So should it follow that they speak exactly the same way? Of course not. So what exaclty is Tannen trying to say here? Absolutely nothing. She simlply puts common knowledge in a formal context and fails to really make any sort of conclusion whatsoever as to what this theory means and how it affects our daily interactions. I think Tannen needs to grow some theoretical balls and follow this up.
A real woman128.163.243.168 00:10, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

message: A real woman128.163.243.168 00:10, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does this have to do with the article?
Talk:Su Wu

message: Hi. I just redirected The Shepherd SuWu to this article (Su Wu). The content before being turned into a redirect is available here: <https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Shepherd_SuWu&oldid=481474596>. --MZMcBride (talk) 02:09, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplicate article 

message: Hi, I am an expert in East Asian history but not specifically in Chinese historiography. My sense is that the opening paragraph uncritically reflects the modern nationalist reading of Su Wu as a national hero who made the most of his time in exile. I would encourage future editors to present the story more neutrally before the article ideally goes on to entertain various interpretations of Su Wu's lore over history. Thanks!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.8.101.195 (talk) 13:50, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overt nationalism
Talk:Fred G. Sanford

message: How come they don't have a page for this character? I came here to see why he wasn't on "A retrospective" and if he left the show at some point. And Demond Wilson's page also state he was in every episode, not true.Email/User Talk 22:54, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lamont 

message: Lamont's name is established in the third episode as "Lamont Grady Sanford," as spoken by Reverend Trimble.
199.59.174.46 (talk) 19:25, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lamont's Name
Talk:Zhizhi

message: I will go through the article and change the title 'Shanyu' to 'Chanyu' throughout (except in quotes). The reason is that the Guangyun, a dictionary compiled in 601 CE by Lu Fayan, and completed during the Song dynasty, gives three readings for the first character of this title [i.e. Chanyu]: dan, chan, and shan. The form chan is specifically mentioned as being used in the Xiongnu title Chanyu. The reading shan is used as a place or family name; the reading dan means 'single' or 'alone.' Also see, for example: "Early Chinese Settlement Policies towards the Nomads." Pan Yihong. Asia Major, 3rd series, Vol. V, Part 2, (1992), p. 42, n. 2; Lexicon of Reconstructed Pronunciation in Early Middle Chinese, Late Middle Chinese and Early Mandarin, p. 48. (1991). Edwin G. Pulleyblank. UBC Press. Vancouver; Indo-Scythian Studies being Khotanese Texts Volume VII, p. 32. H. W. Bailey. Cambridge University Press. John Hill (talk) 03:20, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Chanyu]] is preferable to [[Shanyu]]

message: Xiongnu shanyu zhizhi's (chih chih) death in 36 BC
http://books.google.com/books?id=k4IXwl-jVGMC&pg=PA39#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=S1eqO3Z1rgEC&pg=PA146#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=afZnn1NRxIAC&pg=PA63#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=afZnn1NRxIAC&pg=PA69#v=onepage&q&f=false
Page 39
http://books.google.com/books?ei=5ESwUJq0GtDV0gGWhoHgAw&id=VgzbAAAAMAAJ&q=armour+top+tower#search_anchor
Page 189
http://books.google.com/books?id=CL5xAAAAMAAJ&q=ZhiZhi+Chen+Tang#search_anchor
Page 175
http://books.google.com/books?id=6M26AAAAIAAJ&q=ZhiZhi+rival#search_anchor
Rajmaan (talk) 16:51, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Terentius Maximus

message: This article is not only a stub, but word for word the same as featured in "Pseudo-Nero#Second Impostor" citing the exact same source and may be rerouted this way.
Addition of:
<>
Literature about the False Nero
Lion Feuchtwanger, Der falsche Nero (The Pretender), 1936
</>
may be required.
I´d suggest to use this article to add to/replace parts of 'Pseudo-Nero#Second Impostor' as it is a bit more elaborate, although not containing more information.
Any objections?
Kind regards Pepysshack (talk) 14:33, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Integration into existing page
Talk:Vologases I of Parthia

message: Two paragraphs, one of them insert d in a way that the reference of the second to the preceding text has been destroyed. I therefore edited both to correct it. But I'm not sure whether the details are correct as the text stands, maybe an expert has to do further editing.
--79.192.169.228 (talk) 13:56, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  30. April, 2017: polishing correct?
Talk:South Bend Tribune

message: Please be aware of :Please also read (in the light of this information) and, if you work for the Tribune, read our policy on conflicts of interest. Thank you. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 18:56, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Conflict of Interest

message: The article doesn't clearly indicate that it's talking about the history of the paper when it states "The Tribune's reputation as a conservative, Republican-leaning editorial voice put it at a disadvantage in competition with the more Democrat-leaning News-Times."
The tribune is considered to be a fairly liberal paper now, and I've never even heard of the News-Times so it's probably been gone for quite some time.50.73.100.129 (talk) 15:22, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs better context
Talk:Stitch and glue

message: i need actuall facts. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.255.203.169 (talk) 00:38, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If you want how-to stuff, that's outside the scope of Wikipedia; follow the links at the bottom and you'll find lots of detailed how-to information on various designs.  scot 14:03, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  bbbbbbbbooooooooooorrrring
Talk:Camp Bulkeley

message: ==Untitled==
I placed citation needed markers throughout the text and tried a quick reorganization of the information. The article could use a bit more information than only that of the discussion regarding the Haitian Detention camp that was constructed within the confines of the camp during the 90s and the use of the camp as a part of the current detention camp complex.
Some ideas: A general outline is needed for the article. I'm proposing that the leading paragraph(s) need to be separated. Then in the body of the article have information regarding the origin of the camp, a list of current and former commands, the history of the camp prior to the 90s, the Haitian camp constructed in the 90s for housing persons escaping the coup, the revising of the camp as a facility to support the prison complexes, and the controversies (Haitian Refugees and Current Detainees) regarding the camp. 
A list of facilities could be included to show a more military base aspect to the article instead of just regarding the camp as a detention facility. For instance, the inclusion of an exchange, lyceum, other MWR facilities, etc.User:Aneah 13:43, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: General Notes

message: I placed citation needed markers throughout the text and tried a quick reorganization of the information. The article could use a bit more information than only that of the discussion regarding the Haitian Detention camp that was constructed within the confines of the camp during the 90s and the use of the camp as a part of the current detention camp complex.
Some ideas: A general outline is needed for the article. I'm proposing that the leading paragraph(s) need to be separated. Then in the body of the article have information regarding the origin of the camp, a list of current and former commands, the history of the camp prior to the 90s, the Haitian camp constructed in the 90s for housing persons escaping the coup, the revising of the camp as a facility to support the prison complexes, and the controversies (Haitian Refugees and Current Detainees) regarding the camp. 
A list of facilities could be included to show a more military base aspect to the article instead of just regarding the camp as a detention facility. For instance, the inclusion of an exchange, lyceum, other MWR facilities, etc.User:Aneah 13:43, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I added a couple of items and rewrote the lead. I'm planning on adding some other topics and lot more references. Here are some of the changes/Outline I'm proposing:
* Construction
* History
* Facilities
* Controversies
** Haiti
** Detention Centers
Does anyone have any input?User:Aneah 15:03, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Outline