lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Campidanese Sardinian

message: The ISO 639-3 code is sro according http://www.sil.org/iso639-3/documentation.asp?id=sro. Mglovesfun (talk) 17:02, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. Of course it would have been no problem had you done it yourself. --JorisvS (talk) 10:36, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  sro 

message: should have some english language captions. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 16:26, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  external links 

message: I hereby propose that this page acquire the name of Campidanese Sardinian, like the related article on the Logudorese dialect.--Dk1919 (talk) 13:27, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article should be renamed into "Campidanese Sardinian"
Talk:Option (aircraft purchasing)

message: This concept is certainly noteworthy, however I'm not sure I see enough distinction between aircraft purchase options and options for other types of assets (such as movies, etc.) to justify a separate article. Perhaps the title for an umbrella article is Option (asset) that would include all non-financial options? Ronnotel (talk) 21:08, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The merge tag should be removed. The tag was placed on this article only 15 minutes after the stub was created. This article will expand into much more than a brief definition, and a separate article is necessary to allow for that expansion. It would look silly to have a merged article with a paragraph defining property law, followed by large amounts of specific aviation industry coverage. The tag merge must go. Lester 23:36, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm willing to forego the merge proposal for now. But please understand that an option can be written on essentially any asset and the number of articles with repetitious content will become unwieldy. I believe there should be some over-arching structure so that the common elements of asset options are described once in a main article and asset-specific details are described in parallel sub-articles with consistent format. Go ahead with the article, and let's review what makes sense to concentrate (if anything) when you're done.  Ronnotel (talk) 23:59, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal
Talk:Lime Ridge Mall

message: Should not the page be called "Lime Ridge Mall"? lookitup
* Done! Nhl4hamilton (talk) 08:24, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

message: Please see Wikipedia talk:Canadian Wikipedians' notice board#Cadillac Fairview malls.  --Skeezix1000 (talk) 15:43, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The article was merged against consensus for WP:COMMONNAME. I've changed it back. freshacconci (✉) 18:41, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cadillac Fairview mall articles name discussion
Talk:Keith Robinson (environmentalist)

message: This is just a stub, a lot of info can be added (by me even) when I find good references.  I'm afraid to just say to much without references.  Should be in category American People, and probably made distinctly different than other Keith Robinson listings.Badlandz (talk) 21:11, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think the very name of this page could be POV - describing him as an environmentalist. - 124.191.144.183 (talk) 09:14, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree but I'm not sure of a proper alternative. Keith Robinson (island owner)? Mopenstein (talk) 02:48, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Not just the title but the article as a whole seems to be biased in his favor. He might certainly call himself an environmentalist, but as the article briefly mentions (amid talk of how much he cares for the environment and how he has personally sacrificed financially for the sake of the environment and heritage), he has faced opposition from environmentalists. 1.132.97.80 (talk) 05:04, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: Robinson expressed concerns about his family's ability to continue to maintain their ownership of Niʻihau, due to pressure from the federal and state governments and environmental groups. Environmental lawsuits have been launched against the family by groups such as Earthjustice while taxes on the island have taken much of the profits from the Robinsons' interests in agricultural companies.
The citation actually says the lawsuit was in regards to the family holdings on Kauai not Niihau so I have removed it. What taxes would they have on their own private island? Perhaps this again refers to his holdings on Kauai not Niihau? Citation needed on this or it should be removed as well. --Dejitarob (talk) 16:43, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: To answer your question - property ownership implies property taxes, depending on valuation. which can be increased by government. It's still part of the State of Hawaii! And no, I don't have a citation. Have you tried a Google or Google News search? Yworo (talk) 16:54, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Lawsuit & Taxes
Category talk:British music television shows

message: What was the name of the show that had the female punk musician dropping her trousers incident?--h i s   s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 21:12, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, it's The Word. I'm categorising that here.--h i s   s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 21:22, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:2003 Kiribati parliamentary election

message: Discussion moved to Talk:Kiribatian parliamentary election, 2007.  Please discuss further there. —  AjaxSmack  04:42, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Kiribatian parliamentary election, 2007 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 13:30, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:2007 Kiribati parliamentary election

message: Check this out: "[After the adoption of the name Kiribati by the Kiribati Language Board], a question arose as to what form of Kiribati would be used as an adjective. At first, "Kiribatese" (after Gilbertese) was considered, as well as "Kiribatian" or just plain Kiribati. I-Kiribati, which as a proper noun was being used to refer to a local person, was also employed sometimes as an adjective. Recently, the Board has recommended and the Cabinet has approved the word Kiribati as the adjective and I-Kiribati (or I Kiribati, without the hyphen) as the noun." (my emphases). —  AjaxSmack  04:51, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed. "Kiribatian" is an absurdity, but there has been some slight opposition here to recognising that... I'm going to request a move to "Kiribati parliamentary election, 2007", and see whether sense prevails this time. Aridd (talk) 13:29, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Further discussion
Talk:2007 Kiribati presidential election

message: Discussion moved to Talk:Kiribatian parliamentary election, 2007.  Please discuss further there. —  AjaxSmack  04:43, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Kiribatian parliamentary election, 2007 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 13:30, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:July 2003 Kiribati presidential election

message: Discussion moved to Talk:Kiribatian parliamentary election, 2007.  Please discuss further there. —  AjaxSmack  04:42, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Kiribatian parliamentary election, 2007 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 13:30, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Staré Hory

message: why it is in english language only hungarian name? in other languages there is also german name:
Staré Hory (deutsch Altgebirg, ungarisch Óhegy)
??
Why there is hungarian name at all? 
Village of Stare Hory is part of Slovakia, never was under any hungarian influence, no hungarians have lived there. There is no reason for hungarian name of this village in its English description. 
There is hungarian description in wikipedia and there can be hungarian name.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.32.3.83 (talk) 17:34, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
Talk:The Pill (song)

message: Do we have any sources for the statement that many stations refused to play the song?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.6.194.53 (talk) 22:30, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources? 

message: Ok, since adding the Citation Needed tag near the inforamtion about the Playgril interview I've been able to determine that it was likely in the August 1975 issue.  However I do not have enough information to cite it.  Still need the page numbers, title of article, and in an ideal world the author of the article. ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 13:12, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cite Needed for Playgirl interview
Talk:Molecular wire

message: I just removed the following (bolded) part of a phrase:
: One naturally-occurring molecular wire is DNA, although its biological function is unclear.
If anyone can reconstruct what was meant by "unclear", that would be helpful.–Jérôme (talk) 19:34, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  DNA has unclear function? 
Talk:Battle of Olómpali

message: This line makes no sense.
how can this be the first battle in the Mexican-American war fought in California if there were no American troops there?
--OxAO (talk) 09:37, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  It was the first battle of the Mexican-American War  fought in California. 

message: four american killed five californios wounded. Wynnray (talk) 00:43, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: After July 9, 1846 there was no further California Republic.  The Battle of Natividad occurred during the American campaign in California that began following the definitive word obtained in August, 1846, that the Mexican-American War had begun. Jeff in CA (talk) 06:05, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

text: I read this one article about the battle and about how the californio flag bear shot the officer Tablelegs6 (talk) 06:40, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not the only skirmish with casualties, see battle of Natividad 16  November 1846 

message: I would really like to add it to the articleTablelegs6 (talk) 04:26, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: No, its an WP:Original work and also really doesn't depict anything of value to the article. Cristiano Tomás (talk) 15:47, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Painting 🖼  I worked on
Talk:Florentine dialect

message: Florentine is very very similar to the italian language.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.148.155.69 (talk) 21:16, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yet quite distinct, thus the point of a separate entry.96.42.57.164 (talk) 15:15, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Florentine is a dialect
Talk:Seven Sages

message: I was searching for information about the ancient Babylonian tradition of seven sages and searched "Seven Sages" and the only wikipedia page I found had references only to the Greek hepta sophistai, the Indian Saptarishi, the Chinese Seven Sages of the Bamboo Grove, and some references to Dragon Quest and a Zelda video game. Maybe someone out there with knowledge can add a reference to the Akkadian (and Sumerian?) traditions - and give sources for further study. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.156.144.181 (talk • contribs) 
: Wareh (talk) 14:12, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Babylonian tradition
Talk:M45 (missile)

message: Under "type", this is listed as an ((ICBM)), presumably due to its range. Would it not be more accurate, however, to list it as SLBM, as a submarine (or any naval-based) ballistic missile is by definition not launched from a continental landmass? --Luftschiffritter5 1 (talk) 14:40, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Other SLBM articles list it as SLBM. I've changed it. Dziban303 (talk) 17:21, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Type

message: The figures for in-service missiles (48) must be out of date. I believe that only 16 missiles are currently deployed aboard Temeraire. The other three Triomphant boats have been upgraded to carry the new M51 missile (well, the latest boat, Terrible, was built to carry the M51 from the start). Temeraire will be entering drydock in 2016 for her upgrade to carry the M51 missile, after which point the M45 will no longer be deployed. Unfortunately I don't have any sources with hard numbers, but I'll add them if I find them. Dziban303 (talk) 17:21, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Out of date as of December 2015

message: Why is there an outer casing around the middle missile here:? This is not explained in the article. --User123o987name (talk) 22:44, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing info
Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2007-12-17/Features and admins

message: Featured articles are the same as in Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2007-12-10/Features and admins. Visor (talk) 21:45, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I noticed that and I just came to report the error as well. – Quadell (talk) (random) 21:50, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: . Jon Harald Søby (talk) 13:55, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, you did it! Thanks! – Quadell (talk) (random) 14:13, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Featured articles
Talk:Scott oliaro

message: To the original author:  This article has been nominated as an Article for Deletion (AfD); see Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Scott_oliaro for discussion.  But I think if you take the time to put a case together based on outside sources, you may have a legitimate case here.  I did a quick Google search and found some background to work with, but I don't have the time to pursue it.  The article is not worthy of keeping, but the subject, in my opinion, is.  Any hope of getting better info in here?  (P.S.  If the person who wrote this IS Scott Oliaro, please have someone ELSE do the research and writing, else you are in violation of WP:COI and I'll be disappointed I supported you...)  Thanks,  ΨνPsinu 21:46, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need for better information and current deletion nomination
Talk:Climate stabilization wedge

message: I've done some minimal editing to reframe the "wedge game" as something a bit more serious - the concept is well regarded in academia and the original article by Pacala and Socolow has more than 2,000 citations. So it's more than just a game, it's also a valid approach to climate change mitigation. Still, I am not entirely happy with my edits, so more are welcome!Bksovacool (talk) 07:50, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, and in my view, the article title should be Climate stabilization wedge, with a subsection discussing the game, rather than the other way around. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 10:03, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Light edits but more needed 
Talk:Ron Link (singer)

message: I've got some problems with some of this 'sources'. The homepage of the employer and the hompage of the art work (musical) of the employer are not secondary sources. Wisdom Digital Media and BILL & SUE-ON HILLMAN ECLECTIC STUDIO are IMHO not really reliable sources. Please source from the newspaper articles, even if they are Dutch. (But this looks much more better than before) Greetings Sebastian scha. (talk) 13:18, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: FYI, IMDB is not considered a reliable source, since they have no fact checking.  Furthermore, the link to Toussaud's probably isn't a reliable source, either. -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 07:07, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  More on sources 

message: The article survived AfD, just, but to survive AfD Dutch sources are enough. In the absence of English sources following the more reliable and recent Dutch newspapers, such as Helmond swingt vrijdag met zanger Ron Link 23 July 2013 for "zanger Ron Link" rather than "acteur Ron Link". Therefore have WP:MOVE from (entertainer) to a better sourced dab (singer). Can be reverted by WP:BRD. In ictu oculi (talk) 07:24, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: zanger Ron Link
Talk:Jerzy Wołkowicki

message: Why was this removed?! Source has: "General Wołkowick, the elderly mentor of the antisemitic junior officers and cadets, who defended their criminal behavior towards their Jewish neighbors. Cases of extreme antisemitism are cited in the chapters dealing with his service in Ander's Army (from autumn 1941), in the Totskoye camp, in the headquarters at Buzuluk and even following the army's departure from Russia in the summer of 1942. BarNarDar (talk) 06:35, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Antisemitism
Talk:Hannes Fuchs

message: The notability of Hannes Fuch is questionable.  From the notability guidelines:
:Athletes:
::Competitors and coaches who have competed in a fully professional league, or a competition of equivalent standing in a non-league sport such as swimming, golf or tennis.
::Competitors and coaches who have competed at the highest level in amateur sports (who meet the general criteria of secondary sources published about them).
Since he falls under the amateur level, he meets the first part (competed at highest level).  Now the second part needs to be satisfied.  find secondary sources published about him.  Jons63 (talk) 22:01, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Are there secondary sources about him?  If there are, add them in showing he is notable.  If you can find and add the sources there should be no question of his notability and the tags can be removed.  Jons63 (talk) 22:14, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I haven't found the sources, but there are the articles of this tournaments in Wikipedia. If there are no links, there's a template for this, and you have added it. But there's no relationship between the sources and the notability, so I think the template of notability shouldn't be there. Anyway, you can do what you want, I'm not going to discuss about it anymore or begin an edition war. Walint (talk) 22:20, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have now removed the tag. WP:ATHLETE no longer mentions general notability limits for top-level amateur athletes, and the current wording specifically cites Olympics competitors as generally notable. Therefore, the subject does meet the standards in place, and an AfD on notability grounds would likely be unsuccessful. Giants2008 (27 and counting) 19:32, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Lacey V. Murrow Memorial Bridge

message: The section "future plans" entirely referred to the reverible lanes, which are part of the Homer M. Hadley Memorial Bridge. Therefore I transferred that section to the other article (and modified what was necessary to do so). --Matthiasb-DE (talk) 09:07, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved section ''Future plans'' 

message: According to the Washington State Department of Transportation, the floating portion of the bridge,
is 7,869 feet that makes it either the longest floating bridge in the world.
http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/Projects/SR104HoodCanalBridgeEast/numbers.htm
The Evergreen Point Bridge (SR520) is 7,578 feet (2,310 meters)
The I-90 (Lacey Murrow) floating bridge is 6,620 ft (2,020 meters)
70.90.187.22 (talk) 04:57, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you care to have a go at fixing it? You can find out how to add footnotes at WP:FN. Thank you, Walter Siegmund (talk) 05:56, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Third Longest, not Second Longest (has been for some time) 

message: The article lacks almost totally of information on technical data, e.g. length of spans, width, etc. as well as details on the construction itself. --Matthiasb (talk) 08:19, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion needed 

message: Regarding the old 1940s bridge span that sunk, is it still at the bottom of the lake or did it get pulled back up and dismantled? LukasMaps (talk) 02:52, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The pontoons that sank still remain at the bottom of the lake, but a few were auctioned off for other uses (this one being a breakwater in Craig, Alaska). SounderBruce 05:34, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  What happened to the old bridge that sunk?
Talk:Green wave

message: Pretty picture -- what does it represent?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dngrogan (talk • contribs) 06:47, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diagram near the bottom of page 

message: There are reports that Valencia street in San Francisco, CA, USA has a two-way green wave. How does this work? http://sf.streetsblog.org/2011/01/06/green-wave-becomes-permanent-on-valencia-street/ Nargopolis (talk) 04:40, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Computerized timing. — LlywelynII 13:00, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Two-way wave

message: Does that diagram make any sense to any reader of this page (bar experts in the subject)? It would be worth removing if it adds nothing to a reader's understanding. cheers Geopersona (talk) 08:44, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diagram (again?)
File talk:RadioheadNude.ogg

message: According to Wikipedia:Music samples "Copyrighted, unlicensed music samples should generally not be longer than 30 seconds or 10% of the length of the original song, whichever is shorter. For songs under 5 minutes in length, 10% is shorter.", which means that this sample should be no longer than 25.5 seconds to comply with fair use (4 x 60 seconds + 15 = 255, 10% of which is 25.5 seconds). Just letting you know, because not complying to this holds articles back from becoming featured. ;) - Phorque (talk) 22:03, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: length
Talk:Ship Canal Bridge

message: Link to P.I. article removed.  Link was dead.
67.185.160.190 (talk) 01:41, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Links

message: Should this article have an infobox?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.231.93.28 (talk) 07:07, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. It's pretty simple right now, feel free to add to it. 69.91.177.48 (talk) 01:25, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Hurricane Isaac (2000)

message: I strongly believe this should be merged. It is a more-or-less copy of the TCR, and has next to nothing outside of the SH. There's about a dozen SPAG (spelling and grammar) errors, and there's really little need for such an article. --Hurricanehink (talk) 02:23, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Whatever. Wikipedia is really starting to annoy me. (No offense) Juliancolton (talk) 02:58, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?

message: Now that the article has been recreated (which I assessed as low importance, since it did little of importance), it needs some general cleanup. A different infobox pic would be good, as the current one has a lot of white space. --♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 03:47, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I fished one out of the GOES Hot Stuff site where I got Daniel from this year. While it's not peak intensity or color (and personally, I miss that awesome "ghost boomerang" next to Isaac in the old picture), it fixes the spacing problem. I don't doubt better can be found, but I'm using this for now. (And unfortunately, the file name I uploaded it by has the wrong date. It's been a long day.) (EDIT: Upon consideration, I cropped Joyce from the picture as well, because, in my opinion, it's about 20 times better than the old one. I have it on the seasonal page.) Jake52 My island 08:12, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds good, nice. --♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 15:34, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Todo