lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Great Conspiracy

message: I include below a link to an online translation of Ammianus' report of the 'Great Conspiracy'. I think it would improve the quality of the article if a few direct quotes were given in the stead of select paraphrases. If no one beats me to it, I will eventually get around to it myself. Aryaman (☼) 01:27, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello Aryaman, you might want to have a look at this external link (in Latin), which has slightly different information than the web page that you cite ... some of the web text (in the various copies on the web) is taken from old translations where the authors have "massaged" the original, which looks to be the case with the version you cite (although it's not too bad). I came to this page indirectly, after reading the article on Attacotti, which is terrible ... so I've been going through old references and sifting them for information and misinformation ... I hope to update the article soon, and that will likely have a cascading effect on other articles (such as this one). Regards, Notuncurious (talk) 16:37, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ammianus' Report 

message: I'm unclear on this, wasn't Fullofaudes killed during the fighting? If so, shouldn't we label him as KIA? RoninMacbeth (talk) 16:01, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fullofaudes
Talk:Domrémy-la-Pucelle

message: When exactly was Domrémy renamed Domrémy-la-Pucelle? Stallions2010 23:55, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Even more interesting: What is the original name of Domrémy when it first appeared in documents of the 8th century? --94.216.31.233 (talk) 15:28, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Renaming

message: There's an old joke that it was named after the first three notes on the scale (do-re-mi)... AnonMoos (talk) 09:17, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Musical scales joke
Talk:Ariquemes

message: This page have a portuguese version.--201.5.204.193 23:58, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Nicolaus von Tüngen

message: Just a stub to start, mainly to provide a linkup to a great article about him in Polish Wikipedia, which I hope to translate soon.  As to the form of the name, Google seems to indicate that Nicolaus Tungen is most commonly used, but we can change it of course if evidence of a better form is provided. Balcer 00:00, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks.  Actually, Polish Wiki has a nice set of articles about Bishops of Warmia (:pl:Biskupi warmińscy) and hopefully they will all be eventually translated. It would be nice to add some German or English language sources to the bibliography, in order to resolve what the most appropriate spelling of his name is.  Using Google I saw Nicolaus Tungen used frequently, but that could just be due to multiplication of Wikipedia mirrors.  Balcer 13:43, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps I can add some references, but I'd like to have a look on it and for the next three weeks I have to reduce my time in the wikipedia due to professional duties. Thus it will take some time.--Dagox 09:18, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Since Tüngen is a place, the title here is correct.--DThomsen8 (talk) 22:16, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tüngen
Talk:Marcomannic Wars

message: The claim that two provinces bearing these names had been intended is only alleged by the notoriously unreliable Historia Augusta. For the lack of any confirming source, the claim is doubted by consent, according to the German version of this Wikipedia entry http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Markomannenkriege . Nafiris (talk) 18:36, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marcomannia and Sarmatia 

message: It is mentioned in the article that "the so-called "free Dacians" living between the Danube and Roman Dacia", with regards to the third Marcomannic war. This should be a mistake because as far I know, Danube was the lower limit of the Roman Dacia. The Roman forces came from the south and crossed the Danube. The conquest of Dacia started from the Danube and ended in Transilvania. So it is not possible that Free Dacians would exist between Danube and the Roman Dacia province because there is no such territory. Danube was the limit of Roman Dacia, until the Aurelian withdraw.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:2F05:1309:B500:1043:335D:750B:7E06 (talk) 15:56, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: If you look at the maps at the end of the article, it makes sense: "the free Dacians" were between the Roman Dacia (on the west) and the Danube (on the east and south).Adrian two (talk) 16:16, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location of "Free Dacians"
Talk:Gulf Breeze, Florida

message: While investigating this matter, seen two (2) of these things myself. One was a black sphere, the other was a classic light in the sky that switched itself off when a plane got too close to it. This was in 1998-1999. I've also seen the torn up property in town where UFOs have landed and people have been sending soil samples to have them tested, mainly for radioactivity. I was in Panama City, Florida and in Gulf Breeze itself. Wikipedia protocol forbids listing this due to WP:NOR. Martial Law 00:01, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: UFO

message: The bulk of the History section was lifted directly from the Gulf Breeze Area Chamber of Commerce's website.  Because this represents a copyright violation, I have removed the offending text.  Kindest regards, AlphaEta 16:12, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: FYI it was added in this edit. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 17:27, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major copyright violations in "History" section 

message: I removed the information about Orange Beach being a strict enforcement area per AAA. The link does not seem to work. I am preserving the removed material here so it can easily be restored if the citation can be fixed.
The present link does not bring up anything similar to the quote. Thanks JodyB talk 21:06, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[AAA]] cite 

message: It is not obvious to me why the article at the moment has a See also for Navarre, Florida. Perhaps that should be removed.
It also looks as though the Bruce Smith mansioned is other than the one linked to, and there is no indication that the Bruce Smith mentioned is in fact notable. I believe that should be deleted. Thoughts?--2603:7000:2143:8500:50CA:A49C:529C:9216 (talk) 08:25, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Navarre and Bruce Smith
Talk:Lester Bird

message: I do not recall Lester Bird's ALP being a minority government in 1993.  It could have happened, but the members of his party who were making the threat (Longford Jeremy and Gaston Browne) were appeased by getting a ministerial portfolio and getting Asot Michael's portfolios removed respectively.
:There seems to me to be a great deal unsaid on this page.  I appreciate he is still alive, and so one must be careful to support any comments that are made, but much of the publicity surrounding Bird over the last few years do not appear to even be touched upon here. --Legis (talk - contributions) 14:03, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It is clear that the recent election in Antigua and Barbuda has resulted in biased edits to Lester Bird's page. Beginning on Feb 21, a long list of negative additions were made to the page, and then on Mar 15, the whole page was changed to one that puts Bird in a positive light. The page clearly needs a substantial rewrite to meet NPOV guidelines. GhostWhoVotes (talk) 09:04, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality 

message: There was a previous biography of him about a week earlier and it seems like this current one has taken out factual information that is not positive toward him............  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.88.88.37 (talk) 16:37, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  biography was edited heavily 
Talk:Fard

message: Why does Wajib link to Faaridh? The two are not the same.
"Fard also means to apply make up"? Esquizombi 03:51, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled comments

message: In the Hanafi fiqh, there is a difference between Wajib and Fard, the latter being more obligatory.   Hamid-Masri 14:38, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fard vs Wajib 

message: Farz can also mean ‘the ruling means the thing which is so obligatory that one is not relieved of the obligation until he fulfills it, it is called farz. If this thing is a part of worship, the worship will be void without it, leaving it out is a major sin’.
Not really a sentence, and unreffed quote.  If recast and reffed could go in body at appropriate place.
All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 20:54, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed from lead

message: It's obvious why. Just look at the name.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alesjif (talk • contribs) 19:47, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protect the page.
Talk:No. 15 Squadron RNZAF

message: Neither of these biographies mention that Fisken was a member of 15 Sqn.  Rather, they both report him as being in 14 Sqn.
http://www.nzfpm.co.nz/aces/fisken.htm
http://www.warbirdforum.com/fisken.htm
I believe there may be an error with this entry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Camfairweather (talk • contribs) 00:09, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: G'day, I have removed the entry now. Gillespie p. 250 confirms, IMO, that Fisken served with 14 Squadron: , as does this: . If there are any concerns, please let me know. Happy to discuss further. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 00:34, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Fisken
Talk:Naturist Christians

message: Please keep all comments on this page, and on all article talk pages, to discussion of the improvement of the article.  Please do not use it to make personal attacks or to simply state your point of view on the issue.  Please do not remove any other user's comments from this or any other talk page, and please always sign your comments with four tildes, like this: ~~~~.  Please do this even if you are editing under an IP.  Thanks. -- Vary | Talk 19:48, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Addidtionally, please do not post the identities or personal details of other editors.  Thanks. -- Vary | Talk 19:53, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  How to use talk pages 

message: I feel the purpose of this article is to educate people that there are naturists who are also christians and shouldn't involve a corporation of a similar name. The corporation definitely don't represent all  naturists who are christian.
We need to keep it neutral and have it represent all who use the name and all websites that speak to this segment of society.cyndiann 13:06, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The real purpose of this article 

message: For some reason, a person or persons hiding behind an AOL anon IP address continually remove or vandalize references to the naturist-christians.org website. While I understand that there may be some controversy with the development of a Christian naturist village under development by one of the managers of the site, the vast majority of the website deals with the real Christians living out or investigating a real naturist lifestyle. The site is also home to volumes of information showing that Christians have been involved naturism since the first century.
I would ask the person or persons that are vandalizing this wiki to please halt.
Son-cerely,
Nathan Powers
Natman55 18:54, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Keeping references to naturist-christians.org 

message: I'm redirecting this article to the more complete one at Christian Naturism, which I didn't even realize existed.  I think everything that's in this one is already covered there, and this article has't been edited in ages except for a few dozen removals and replacements of that one link. -- Vary | Talk 17:42, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect
Talk:John Rivett-Carnac

message: At the junction of ellen brook and the swan theres a plaque behind that little old church Gnangarra 00:24, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: 2 locations Success Hill in Bassendean, and as discussed at the old church. I know have plaques.  Also I've goto Canning River images on my commons Acc Here Gnangarra 03:33, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Statham-Drew (2003) states that John Rivett Carnac was the son of an acting Governor in India. James Rivett-Carnac, 1st Baronet of Derby was Governor of Bombay from 1838 to 1841. He had a son named John Rivett-Carnac who became MP for Lymington and 2nd Baronet of Derby.  However, this John Rivett-Carnac was born in 1818, which would make him only nine years old when our John Rivett Carnac was exploring the Swan River.
So either
1. John Rivett Carnac was the illegitimate son of James Rivett-Carnac, born a good ten years before James married at the age of 31, and James Rivett-Carnac later gave his first legitimate son the same name.
or
2. John Rivett Carnac was not the son of James Rivett-Carnac, and Statham-Drew has confused two people of the same name.
I have just sent an email to Dr Statham to see if she can shed any light on the matter. Snottygobble 02:42, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: John Rivett Carnac and John Rivett-Carnac
Talk:Coat of arms of Georgia

message: Hello, gyus! 
Does somebody know why the Coat of arms of Bulgaria and Georgian coat of arms are so similar? A historucal reason, some kind of connection? --Komitata 00:24, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

message: The COA image needs to be updated. The Georgian COA has been slightly modified since its adoption in 2004. Here's the current version. Please help with it. Thanks, --KoberTalk 10:53, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What are the differences between the two? Chris 15:22, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Two crosses from the flag of Georgia have been added to the coat of arms. Also, there're some minor details modified in the lower part of the coa. (Sorry, I'm not that good in heraldic terminology.) --KoberTalk 15:27, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please update the image
Talk:Sunnyvale Middle School

message: The years referenced in the name changes are off. It says the school became Sunnyvale Middle School in 1994. However, I attended from 1991-1993, and it was already called that, so the name had to have been changed sometime prior. I don't have the exact year, but for now I'm just going to edit it to say that change had occurred by the early-90s. Somebody can confirm it with a source later if possible. Also, the year my brother was in 6th grade (1996-97) was the first year the school added it. -- Michael 24 June 8, 2014 4:53PM  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michael24 (talk • contribs) 23:53, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Talk:Michael Eysenck

message: I feel he is notable enough for his own page, although I am loathe to start new pages for academics. (I should point out that I'm not one of his students, and I don't know him!). Will add what I can, those with more knowledge though PLEASE add what you can to this page! Badgerpatrol 00:35, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub
Talk:Crumber

message: This article seems unencyclopedic.  Should its content be moved content to Wiktionary? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blackeagle (talk • contribs) 01:37, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: (Comment)

message: The article doesn't describe at all how this thing works. Does it vaporise crumbs with a powerful laser? Or contain tiny frogs that like to eat crumbs? More seriously, just reading the article, I thought it was some kind of brush. Somebody should state the obvious.--ospalh (talk) 20:47, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Operation/Construction 

message: I am new to Wikipedia, joining because of my interest and experience in the Crumber. My Company manufactures the Table Crumber patented in 1941 and I personally have been involved with it for the last 25 years. There are other types of Crumbers which I am aware of that proceeded our design but in general, some of the information on this page does not appear correct. In particular the reference to Italian American restaurants and Crumbers beiing gifted to soldiers in WWII. Without a reference who is to say that it is or it isn't correct? I hate to make changes based solely on my experience, particularly because I am new to Wikipedia.
Your thoughts....
RayMachine (talk) 17:11, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questionable Crumber Information
Talk:Future Wars

message: More info on the engine can be found on the ScummVM mailing list and on the cinE project forum analoguedragon 15:14, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Engine 

message: Does anybody know how this was originally released on CD?
Because, when I first played it, it was on a CD, with a full CD soundtrack... but it came on the BattleChess CD. (and wasn't even advertised as being on the disk) Did it have a separate CD release? Because it was sooo confusing to find a free, unlisted game on a CD. Bladestorm 19:23, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No. Perhaps you had a cd with a collection of games Pictureuploader 22:26, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Future Wars CD? 

message: Does anyone have sources for the "aka" titles Time Travelers: the menace and Adventures in Time? -- Darklock (talk) 15:39, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Titles sources 

message: Interestingly, this article doesn't hint at all towards the same-named game from 2010 by Radon Labs. Alrik Fassbauer (talk) 10:36, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Future Wars by Radon Labs

message: *Jeux & Stratégie nouvelle formule #5 (as "Les Voyageurs du Temps")https://archive.org/details/jeux-et-strategie-nf-5/page/18/mode/2up
207.229.139.154 (talk) 13:21, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reviews
Talk:Mayday Trippe

message: I've tagged this for concerns re: notability, lack of unaffiliated sources and conflict of interest. What I find remarkable is that 5 1/2 years after this AFD discussion  the article still has no reliable sources. The one particular claim to significance is the collaboration on a graphic novel that won the Eisner and Harvey Award, but it appears that some 80 artists worked on that. Unless someone finds something on Google or elsewhere that I've missed, this may be in line for a second AFD discussion. 76.248.149.98 (talk) 00:47, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It appears that in 2006 the strongest argument for 'keep' was that "it fulfills the biography guidelines for being published in a book in excess of 5000 copies." I'm not familiar with that guideline; does it still exist, and does it carry weight? 76.248.149.98 (talk) 00:55, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Article issues
Talk:Conscientious objection to military taxation

message: Does RFPTFA need its own page, or should discussion of it be included in this one? -Moorlock 00:41, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Conscientious objection to military taxation → Conscientious objection to military taxation in the United States
This article deals almost exclusively about this phenomenon in the United States.  Please discuss at Talk:Tax protester#Requested move.  —  AjaxSmack   06:32, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:41, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]] 

message: > A “peace tax fund” payer, on the other hand, pays just as much money as the ordinary taxpayer, but just cherishes the illusion that her dollars were peaceful ones. It would be as if the government told conscientious objectors that they had to take up arms and shoot at the enemy just like everybody else, but that they didn’t have to take credit for their kills if they didn’t want to.
The use of the word cherish is odd, and the assumption that the author knows the illusions of a "peace tax fund" payer. The analogy is strange and undeveloped. quorn3000 (talk) 11:56, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutral tone and dubious analogy 
Talk:The 519

message: If would be really appreciated if someone with the time did some work on this article. I personally can't do the work as I am very busy busy with school and business, but this article would be a great asset to the Wikipedia community if it was cleaned up. Thanks to anyone who steps up to the plate to help!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Intuitive Person (talk • contribs) 01:49, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Work On Article Appreciated
Talk:Andrew Viterbi

message: Shouldn't the abbreviations for Master of Science and Bachelor of Science be MSc and BSc, respectively? That's what we use here in New Zealand...
::How about this, I'm just going to change them from abbreviations to the full terms.CharacterZero 22:14, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Excessive sweating

message: I spent a fair bit of time wikifying this article, which appears to be an advertisement for some websites, before I searched for related topics.  While I doubt there is much that is not already covered there, anything here that is useful and new should be added to the Hyperhidrosis article, preferably by a subject matter expert. SailorfromNH 00:51, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Mother Pollard

message: Refered author to Wikiquote. --TKE 01:00, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Boycott when and over what.  Quote needs context too.  NickelShoe (Talk) 16:41, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Context

message: Does this article really requre two cleanup tags?  It's a stub and stubs obviously require expansion.  I think that this article only requires expansion; not cleanup.  --Strothra 01:12, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tags 

message: I've started trying to expand this article, but I'm running into a bit of a problem with sources; i.e. I can't find anything about Mother Pollard's full name, DOB, date of death, etc. which would be very nice to have here.  I added some more context though so at least it is clearer in what context the quote she is most famous for was made.--Isotope23 17:17, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources
Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero

message: Well I am here keeping an eye on this page but I will wait until Zapatancas returns and then I can reasonably quickly put my side of the case (I am checking wikipedia every day) though at the moment there ios no specific dispute between Zaqpatancas and I. While I have access to a computer I can't give a lot of time to wikipedia at the moment, SqueakBox 01:09, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, then put on the sectin under your name "I think currently there's no dispute", no need to wait for zapatancas for that --  ( drini's page ☎ ) 01:54, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

message: I only discovered this edit today. IMO it proves zapatancas has been lying and that he was not serious about mediation. I don't want Zapatancas apology but to deal with me he must take responsibiolity for his past actions including his death threats and hate campaign as SP and SPAA, SqueakBox 18:07, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandal Zapatancas