Talk:Reality hacking

message: In order for New World Order (conspiracy theory) to be judged a good article by the Wikipedia community, I am interested in collaborating with anyone who has created a user account to make it meet good article criteria. --Loremaster (talk) 18:26, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  To become a Good Article 

message: "See also" are a list, lists are worse then text. Wiki is not paper, we should have room to discuss all related issues, and "See also", which rarely discuss the linked items, give little indication why they are relevant. According to some Wikipedia administrators: 1) if something is in See also, try to incorporate it into main body 2) if something is in main body, it should not be in see also and therefore 3) good articles have no See also sections. --Loremaster (talk) 23:44, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: About "See also" sections 

message: The seminal cyberculture/psychedelia magazine Mondo 2000 was originally called Reality Hackers (see the Mondo 2000 entry here on Wikipedia) in 1988.  
The tag line "hacking reality" appeared on the occult blog Technoccult, possibly before Irreality. This archive.org entry from November 2001 (http://web.archive.org/web/20011128152156/http://www.technoccult.net/) predates the launch of Irreality in December 2001 (reference: http://frequency23.net/content/view/777/).
The article has been changed accordingly for historical accuracy
The usage of "reality hacking" in White Wolf games precedes its use on Irreality or Technoccult. According to the Wikipedia entry for Mage: the Ascension the first edition was released in 1993 and the most recent release was published in 2000.
24.21.166.9 01:15, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: A few notes

message: Why is this listed under "Magic"? I'm taking that off. Kennard2 10:49, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Magic?

message: The link to "social redemption", which I assume was meant to go to an article about the phenomenon of social redemption as a concept, instead goes to an article about a Christian organization that happens to have that name.  Somehow I doubt that's what was intended.  Any comments/insights? - Mark Dixon 04:48, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've replaced with the mention of "social redemption" with "social reconstructionism". --Loremaster (talk) 17:43, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Social redemption

message: This article blows.  It sounds like it was written as a college essay by somebody who uses a thesaurus to try and cover for their lack of writing ability.  I would think about rewriting it if I had any clue what they are talking about in the first place.  Hopefully somebody can make some sense out of it.  68.116.57.139 (talk) 07:13, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with Chaos5023. Someone needs to initiate the proper deletion debate process. --Loremaster (talk) 22:21, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Bad article

message: I've just merged this article to hacking (innovation), which was formerly titled Hacker (programmer subculture). Please see the discussion at talk:hacking (innovation)#Grand merge for the rationale and a plan for moving forward. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) - talk 11:01, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grand merge