lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:High Court of Justice (1649)

message: I have noticed that a number of pages about the trial of Charles I link to a page about the current High Court of Justice which has no connection with the body that tried Charles I apart from the name. I have created this page to act as a destination for these links.
Rjm at sleepers 09:44, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Be bold - edit the article. Rjm at sleepers (talk) 09:08, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reason for creation

message: I have reverted the page move (22:00, 10 September 2017) under RMUM and precision. Titles of kings are usually not inclded in page names eg the biography of Charly is under "Charles I of England" not "King Charles I of England" (a redirect). -- PBS (talk) 08:24, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert of page move 

message: A recent edit has amended the text to read - "The court proceeded as if the king had pleaded guilty (pro confesso), rather than subjecting Charles to the pien fort et dure, that is, pressing with stones, as was standard practice in case of a refusal to plead". The supporting reference says that pien fort et dure did not apply in cases of treason - "in treason cases peine forte et dure was inapplicable, because standing mute in such cases meant a plea of guilty". I believe that the King was charged with high treason so did pien fort et dure apply? Rjm at sleepers (talk) 06:09, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  pien fort et dure 

message: The Aftermath section of this article is a bit sloppy and is about general events after Charles I's execution. Is this section really helpful? I suggest that removing it entirely is an improvement. Thoughts anyone? 2A02:C7C:D05D:4F00:99D8:5B02:2716:8949 (talk) 16:21, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aftermath
Talk:Dekotora

message: These are also found in India/Pakistan--达伟 (talk) 17:52, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The decorated trucks in India and Pakistan are distinct from Japanese Dekotora trucks. There's already an article for truck art in south asia that talks about those trucks. TKOIII (talk) 16:41, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  India/Pakistan
Talk:Longlin Various Nationalities Autonomous County

message: To add to this article: a list of administrative divisions. 173.88.246.138 (talk) 22:09, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: To add to this article

message: Which is the official English-language translation of this administrative division?
1) Longlin Various Nationalities Autonomous County
or
2) Longlin Pan-Ethnicities Autonomous County
If our article is to be properly encyclopedic, this should really be clarified. 173.88.246.138 (talk) 22:11, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Which is the official English name?
Talk:David Marr (neuroscientist)

message: Just to clarify, is this the David Marr who is a professor of Vietnamese history at the Australian National University, or some other David Marr??  JackofOz 22:29, 23 Dec 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: Judging by what links here, it's a fellow involved in AI. - Hephaestos 22:55, 23 Dec 2003 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copied from [[Talk:David Marr]] 

message: I don't know who is making the claim that he is the founder of computational neuroscience. Marr's work was very influential in both computational neuroscience and psychology, but he did not found the field. Some of the earliest papers on computational models of neural networks came out two years before Marr was born, such as the extremely influential papers by Warren McCulloch and Walter Pitts. Not to mention the work by Donald Hebb, which elaborated on computational principles that he thought contributed to how neurons learn. Unless somebody can justify this claim, I'm going to downgrade it from founder to being just a highly influential person.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.110.161.166 (talk) 02:16, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I wouldn't describe Hebb as a computational neuroscientist, but in other respects I agree with you and approve of this change. Looie496 (talk) 02:31, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

text: Currently he is not anything, since he is not alive.  But as the article states, his position at MIT was in the Department of Psychology, so I think it it reasonable to refer to him as a psychologist.  At the time he was working, it was very rare for neuroscience to be considered an independent discipline. Looie496 (talk) 21:31, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Founder of computational neuroscience
Talk:Måns Zelmerlöw

message: I just counted the amount of foreign language references and I found about 38 out of 58 of them where foreign (roughly 66%). Would it be good to find some English references (as it is English Wikipedia) and should we then remove the Swedish ones? Since help would be good...
--Seagull123 (talk) 18:24, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Foreign references

message: I changed the words about his remarks on homosexuality according to what he actually says in the show (clip available here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YcHdSJtCWKQ). The word "avvikelse" is something another guest on the show prompts him to say, so it should not be the main issue. He stated clearly in the show that he doesn't think there is anything wrong about homosexuality, but he believes it is not natural in the biological sense of the word, since it does not lead to reproduction. Therefore I think this should be the core of the paragraph. Aikclaes (talk) 13:39, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversy regarding comments on homosexuality

message: I edited the External links, to add a webpage from fans to Mans, yet no one is approving it. is think there is no better place than wikipedia to publish website like this.
here is the desired link:
click here — Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.237.70.61 (talk) 14:22, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: External Links
Talk:Sonja Aldén

message: Sonja was the last artist being announced as a finalist. thats great for a new artist!--Matrix17 21:20, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 1
Talk:Sanna Nielsen

message: The article looks good now. Nice work everyone.BabbaQ (talk) 08:57, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Article
Wikipedia talk:Redirects for discussion/Cross-namespace

message: There are a number of "bad titles" in there that might be served by a protected redlink. Agathoclea 10:26, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

message: It seems to me that most of these list→category redirects are probably the result of AfDs on the original lists.  I see no particular reason for deleting any of them, although I don't see much reason for keeping the ones that are already orphaned and have been for some time either.  Does anyone else have an opinion on these?  It does seem somewhat silly to have an AfD closed as "redirect to category" only to have someone else come along and delete the resulting cross-namespace redirect.  —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 14:20, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What? Common sense expected, you must be joking! Maybe an option would be to insert a  and filter that from the list. Agathoclea 17:23, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with Ilmari.  Generally, redirects of the form "List of X" to "Category:X" should be kept, provided that the "X" in both items is substantially identical.  However, if there's a redirect "List of X" to "Category:Y" where X is a subset of Y, that should be deleted. YechielMan 16:43, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of X &rArr; Category:X 

message: Should I give the project page the shortcut WP:RFD-XNR? It fits the page. TRKtv (daaaaah!) 03:27, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shortcut 

message: The proposed "mass deletion" of the redirects on this page is a bad idea.  While many of these redirects ought to go, many have history or serve some other purpose that requires investigation and discussion before deciding to kill the redirect.  Nominate them individually on RFD and let the process work.  You could perhaps nominate a class of very similar redirects (like the "list of -> category") but keep the class small enough that the discussion is relevant.  Rossami (talk) 13:22, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that mass deletion isn't a good idea.  We need to at least look at incoming links.  Another thing to mention is that if these get deleted with little or no discussion, many of them will be recreated over time, mostly by people unaware of the original deletion.  It would probably save time in the long run to get some of this stuff into guidelines (e.g. "don't redirect from mainspace to wikiprojects", assuming there's a consensus for that).  This would only be for things that are likely to get recreated.  If we get a strong consensus to delete a large, well defined category, we might consider adding it to CSD R2.  Dave6 talk 01:58, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  proposed mass deletion 

message: I rearranged this list into categories at User:Dave6/Cross-namespace redirects.  Some of them are probably small enough and similar enough to discuss as a group at RfD.  Dave6 talk 04:52, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categories
Talk:English District of the Lutheran Church – Missouri Synod

message: This is actually a bit of a joke, and these bylines throughout the districts can be done away with.  These notes are especially a joke to mention in a district such as this one, as the English District is one of the non-geographic districts of the LCMS.  --Dulcimerist 10:28, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I realize it's obviously more pronounced and awkward with this district (and the SELC), but it does help readers quickly locate the churches in each state rather than having to search the list. MisfitToys 23:26, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Only congregation in..."

message: A special note could be made on the different times there have been resolutions brought before the Synodical Convention that would dissolve the non-geographic districts, absorbing those congregations into the normal geographic districts.  I can't remember which years an overture of this nature was made, though.  This would be of interest to the article.  --Dulcimerist 10:32, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The first time it was suggested that the English District dissolve was back in 1923.  This fact is located here: English District History  --Dulcimerist 10:38, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Non-geographic Districts

message: I am removing the extended list of congregations & missions.  I certainly see the value of an article on a middle judicatory for a major american denomination, but not for the directory style list. Athanasius • Quicumque vult  18:45, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:NOTDIR]] 
Talk:Pardes (legend)

message: Hello,
I rather boldly deleted the paragraph below from the pardes page and apologize if I have caused offence. It is just that it makes a few unsubstantiated claims, like "Laymen claim..." etc. and judgements ("false heaven") and is thus unencyclopedic and detrimental to the standards of Wikipedia. Please contact me if you wish to discuss the matter further.
All the best,
Ignacio Bibcraft 22:50, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

message: First, the legend and the exegetical method are distinct. So we need either 2 articles or a different title.
Second, the exegetical method needs to be expanded significantly and explained better, maybe with examples. Drash, for instance, includes halakhic midrash not just homiletic, see midrash. Thanks. HG | Talk 18:53, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right; this article needs a lot of work. But with respect to your points, this title is correct, because there already is a disambiguation page at Pardes and a page about exegesis at Pardes (Jewish exegesis). I'm going to try to improve this a little now, but I don't have much time to spare. — Malik Shabazz (Talk | contribs) 19:59, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi there Malik, shanah tovah. I moved the exegesis stuff, thanks. But I don't quite see why this anecdote is an article in itself. Why not make it background the the exegesis piece, which should end up longer and richer anyway? I don't see how this can grow into a full article. Is it so notable? Sure it's quoted alot, so put it into the relevant (quoting) topics. Maybe merge into something on aggadah or Elisha b. A., as an example? Maybe I should post my first AfD? LOL. HG | Talk 20:16, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, here's where it should be moved. This is an anecdote about the study of mystical doctrines, now best covered under kabbalah. The story doesn't have much history or notability except in that context, or for biographical/analytical pieces on the individuals involved. So, would you join me in proposing an AfD? HG | Talk 20:28, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: G'mar chatima tova. I largely replaced the article with a portion of what I had written about the legend at Elisha ben Abuyah. There could be sections about how the fates of the three rabbis have been interpreted. Or we could delete this article and editors can include that interpretation in each rabbi's article if they choose to. Obviously it's most significant with respect to Elisha. — Malik Shabazz (Talk | contribs) 20:35, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs work 

message: Based on above, I see that Malik et al. have written the legend up quite splendidly in the Elisha ben Abuyah article. I added a short item to [[Kabbalistic doctrines, to illustrate Talmudic concerns with mystical study. There it can refer to Elisha piece for more info. So there's no need to try to expand this. Instead, I propose to turn this into a redirect to the Elisha section. Thanks! HG | Talk 20:55, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed redirect
Talk:Ontario Court of Justice (General Division)

message: The Ontario Court of Justice (General Division) was created in 1990. It was the principal trial court for civil matters for about nine years. On April 19, 1999, the Ontario Court of Justice (General Division) ceased to exist and was succeeded by the Superior Court of Justice.
The page redirects to Ontario Superior Court of Justice.
Note that with the reorganization and renaming of the various Ontario courts in 1999, what is now called the Ontario Court of Justice is not the same as, and not the successor to, what used to be called the Ontario Court of Justice (General Division). --Mathew5000 10:33, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:SELC District of the Lutheran Church – Missouri Synod

message: This is actually a bit of a joke, and these bylines throughout the districts can be done away with.  These notes are especially a joke to mention in a district such as this one, as the English District is one of the non-geographic districts of the LCMS.  --Dulcimerist 10:28, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I realize it's obviously more pronounced and awkward with this district (and the English District), but it does help readers quickly locate the churches in each state rather than having to search the list. MisfitToys 23:26, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Only congregation in..."

message: A special note could be made on the different times there have been resolutions brought before the Synodical Convention that would dissolve the non-geographic districts, absorbing those congregations into the normal geographic districts.  I can't remember which years an overture of this nature was made, though.  This would be of interest to the article.  --Dulcimerist 10:32, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Non-geographic Districts

message: I am removing the extended list of congregations & missions.  I certainly see the value of an article on a middle judicatory for a major american denomination, but not for the directory style list. Athanasius • Quicumque vult  19:09, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:NOTDIR]] 

message: Our Saviour's is no longer a member of the SELC District, having moved to the English District over 10 years ago.  Also, the current membership is closer to 80.
messor (talk) 21:50, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Largest Congregation in Ontario

message: 'SELC' is (or once was) presumably an abbreviation of something? What does it stand for? —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 19:41, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The SELC District is the result of the Synod of Evangelical Lutheran Churches (formerly the Slovak Evangelical Lutheran Church) merging into the LCMS. They wanted to retain the SELC acronym as a reminder of their heritage. Indyguy (talk) 21:04, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course I see that now. That was mentioned in the article, but not with explicit definition of the abbreviation. I just added that. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 00:20, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  SELC abbreviation? 
Talk:Sunan Kalijaga

message: "Kalijaga's beliefs and teaching are more sufistic than salaf" - Isn't that an anachronistic way to put it? Salafism did not exist in the 16th century; Tasawwuf was also not seen as something separate from Islam, but rather generally considered as one of the main Islamic disciplines... 118.173.195.58 (talk) 07:46, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Salaf?
Talk:Yasunori Katō

message: This article is undersourced and is missing important information on the character's concept and creation which needs to be added to the article. Some information in the article is unsourced and should be given proper citations or removed from the article. The character's biography us unsourced and should be given proper citations. All of these changes and additions need to occur in order for this article to meet Wikipiedia's guidelines and standards of a well developed and properly sourced article.--Paleface Jack (talk) 23:09, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation and Expansion
Talk:Lubomyr Romankiw

message: --I'm going to translate the Ukrainian article to english by hand very soon.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Linster247 (talk • contribs) 21:51, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Translate
Template talk:Microsoft 365

message: Isn't Office Live Meeting is missing from this list? --Pinnecco 10:50, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Bold italics look ugly and badly rendered...any ideas?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 221.128.147.174 (talk) 06:20, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bold italics for major apps 

message: I do not believe Onenote is a core application. OneNote is only in Student edition and in Enterprise/Ultimate. OneNote does not have the ribbon, used in core applications. I have removed bold italics from OneNote. If anyone wants to override me, please do so. -- Whiteandnerdy111 (talk) 22:17, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  OneNote 

message: I've moved WordArt from "Discontinued" to "Tools and Technologies" since WordArt is very much alive and well in Office 2007: http://www.uwec.edu/Help/Office07/wordart-w.htm  —Preceding unsigned comment added by W3bbo (talk • contribs) 18:37, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WordArt 

message: ¿Could Microsoft Delve already be added to the list or should we wait until it's more mature ah? Sincerely, --Namlong618 (talk) 16:29, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Microsoft Delve
Talk:Bohdan Hawrylyshyn

message: I'm finishing Ukrainian article about Bohdan Hawrylyshyn, so I'll translate it into english soon. --Yarko 11:13, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  new info 
Talk:Pierre Cérésole

message: Surely it can't be correct that Ceresole spent only *hours* in prison?  — Preceding Not2late (talk) 13:58, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Time spent in prison
Talk:Fatou Ndiaye Sow

message: This article is the only one in both Senegales children's writers and Senegalese women children's writers. Thos does not seem a justifiable schema. We would be better off upmerging to categories with more articles.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:03, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Please look again. The category now has three people in it. Please try to populate categories rather than emptying them. Furthermore, if you have a problem with a category post it on the category talk page. Mason (talk) 01:36, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Two one article categories
Talk:Ampol

message: John Christian Waston is given as a founder. I think this is wrong and the founder was Chris Watson(a former Prime Minister of Australia). My reason for this belief is that on Chris Watson's page he is credited with helping to start AMPOL.  118.211.62.21 (talk) 12:25, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: There is a split discussion in Talk:Caltex regarding splitting the Australian operations in Caltex into a separate article Caltex Australia. This may affect this article due to the potential rebranding of Caltex Australia to Ampol. Marcnut1996 (talk) 23:51, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Split discussion of Caltex

message: * :Caltex Australia → 
* :Ampol → 
* :Caltex Australia & :Ampol → 
– Caltex Australia has been officially renamed Ampol after annual general meeting today (14 May 2020). Therefore, in current and future contexts, Ampol will refer to the currently-listed company, and hence the Caltex Australia page should be renamed Ampol. The older Ampol will then be renamed to disambiguate from the new Ampol. This is similar to Transdev vs Transdev (historic). Marcnut1996 (talk) 09:32, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Nom: I have changed from a move request to a merge discussion. We will have to elect which edit history to retain. Marcnut1996 (talk) 07:47, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Ampol article edit history should be retained. The Caltex Australia article, despite being more detailed, only split from the global Caltex article two months ago. DilatoryRevolution (talk) 14:48, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion in progress
Talk:Apparent sun

message: maybe mistake? That is "mean sun"! Philip tao 11:12, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You are correct. The article does not define the apparent sun, which means the observed position of the Sun on the celestial sphere, differing from its position calculated via Newton's universal theory of gravitation due to the affects of atmospheric refraction, aberration, light-time, parallax, and relativity. The article's current definition refers to the "ficticious mean sun", which I doubt was invented by Simon Newcomb even though he certainly used it. I'm not sure whether "apparent sun" should be redirected to solar time, which is where mean sun currently redirects, or whether a separate article is warranted, substantially different from the current version. Any preference? — Joe Kress 01:04, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Mean sun
Talk:Chepang people

message: According to a show on Arirang TV, the Chepang are starting to use Hangeul to write their language in order to preserve it. Perhaps something should be mentioned here. 203.229.118.4 11:17, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Citation needed. AFAIK, the Hunminjeongeum Society (Seoul) failed to convince the Chepang to use Hangul. -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs email 09:05, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

message: specific works by the three authors cited at the end of the article, also specific references also for claims made in the article, would improve. Schissel | Sound the Note! 18:14, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References to 
Talk:Bernard McGuirk

message: It was surprisingly easy to rewrite this article. There was only one or two sentences "borrowed" from the MSNBC web site. The rest of the article was written solely by me. Let's get this thing resolved and the article restored back to where it belongs. What do you say? Mister Jinxy 11:19, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Copyright issue resolved via wikipedia-permissions. See administrator User:Yamla for further. Mister Jinxy 19:48, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite

message: What happened to McGuirk after the Rutgers controversy?--Seventy-one 23:35, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A week later he followed Imus out the door. JimScott 03:59, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rutgers
Talk:Yasam

message: I intend to expand this article, from listing various notable events the Yassam was involved in, to criticism of the unit from various corners of Israeli society. There'smuch to be said about them, so it should end up being a fairlyinformative article. All sourced, of course. LeaHazel : talk : contribs 11:33, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion + sourcing