lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Zug

message: The first rule of tax evasion is you don't discuss tax evasion...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.148.197.233 (talk) 18:51, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Recreation of previously deleted, with comments still pertinent at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crypto Valley.
New article has WP:CITEKILL and refers to obscuring that this is a 1. neologism WP:POVFORK for Zug failing WP:NEO with 2. promo and 3. WP:TOOSOON compared to established ones such as Silicon Valley. Per previous successful deletion and similar minor/obscure promo terms Silicon Spa etc where a redirect is most appropriate. Widefox; talk 12:20, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: See below. Widefox; talk 04:25, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  Unlikely in what way? It's not slang, is used in multiple RS, has 1/4M Ghits ("crypto valley") including gold standard sources like  BBC,  BBC, and  Business Insider. We have many other precedents List of technology centers#Places with "Silicon" names. It is a valid link used in one article. A redirect to the section of Zug about a non-notable subtopic seems more useful than search and is WP:CHEAP. (ps User:Buidhe your sig doesn't have separate both links) Widefox; talk 04:13, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Crypto Valley]] 

message: Zug has become inexplicably intertwined with the Russian economy and has been in the spotlight for not executing sanctions against the assets of sanctioned oligarchs which are found in Zug.  These close ties to Moscow, and its unwillingness or impotence to cut them has put Zug in a very uncomortable spotlight which ought to be mentioned. 178.4.234.161 (talk) 06:55, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ties to Russian economy particularly Putin and his allies
Talk:Sithi

message: This article currently seems to describe two entirely unrelated topics: a race from a fictional fantasy series, and a Cambodian word/organisation. It should probably be split into separate articles. (I'm not sure that either of those topics is actually notable, but that's a different matter.) Robofish (talk) 11:44, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested split
Talk:Stenberg

message: Judging by other last name disambig pages, I think the category surnames should be retained to make the page more accessible. matt91486 20:39, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Slant Magazine

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Elli (talk | contribs) 15:14, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Slant Magazine →  – I think the magazine/website is really called Slant, not Slant Magazine. (This might have changed at some point - no idea.)
Clues from slantmagazine.com:
* Logo only says "Slant"
* The site seems to refer to itself exclusively as Slant in prose; Donate page refers to "Since its foundation in 2001, Slant has..." ... "Sign up to receive Slant’s latest reviews, interviews, lists, and more" ... "if you like what we do, consider becoming a SLANT patron" ... articles credited to "Slant Staff"... etc
* 
* Social media accounts say "Slant" - eg Instagram account, Twitter
Thoughts? Popcornfud (talk) 11:12, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 2 June 2021
Talk:Hidden asset

message: I believe Carey Mogerman to be one of the most brilliant legal minds of the 21st century.  Only his refusal to play politics with the war in Iraq kept him from being nominated to lead the Supreme court bench.  We are truly blessed to have his participation in this project 69.237.146.187 20:47, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Carey Mogerman
Talk:Singular distribution

message: "A singular distribution is not a discrete probability distribution because each discrete point has a zero probability"
Is this correct?I think each discrete point has nonzero probability. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Srgvie (talk • contribs).
:Well, taking the Cantor distribution as an example, each point indeed has a zero probability. Indeed the definition "a singular distribution is a probability distribution concentrated on a measure zero set where the probability of each point in that set is zero" makes this clear: every point where the distribution is concentrated has zero probability. --Henrygb 21:02, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I am not convinced that the requirement that the distribution be non-vanishing only on a set of measure zero is germane/important/correct.  One example is the CDF built from the fat Cantor set, which I think qualifies as a singular distribution w.r.t. the Lebesgue measure, but clearly is singular on a set of measure greater than zero.  I give two more examples on the talk page for singular function, which appears to have the same 'measure-zero' problem ... linas (talk) 05:40, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Measure zero !?!?
Talk:Fruit Stripe

message: "Wrappers contain tattoos of Red Hot inline skating, playing baseball, hang gliding, playing basketball, bicycling, snowboarding, surfing, playing soccer, playing tennis, and eating grass."
I lol'd.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.3.189.114 (talk) 05:31, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

message: Can we really call this the coolest gum? This sounds more like opinion than fact
it was definantly the coolest!
There is a citation needed for the Saddam blurb in the article. It sounds like a BS to me unless someone can find a credible source to confirm it. Szaman2 13:37, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: At the very least it's the only gum that attempts to cultivate a "cool" image, so it's fair to say they've succeeded at being the coolest gum until some other gum enters that 'contest'.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.182.130.241 (talk) 21:16, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Coolest?
Talk:Primary life support system

message: I can't tell from the cutaway if the O2 canisters are pressure vessels or cryogenic dewars. The article doesn't say, either. Did the LEM have cryogenic dewars, or also only pressure vessels? I presume the suit vessels could be re-charged from the LEM system for multiple moonwalks, as on Apollo 17. How did that work? SBHarris 18:34, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: How is the oxygen stored?

message: Currently this article gives measurements only in imperial units. Someone needs to add equivalent measurements using SI units. R160K 19:57, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  SI Units Missing 

message: Seems to me this could do with a lot more relating and linking to the science and similar technologies of life support systems generally. Rexparry sydney 05:02, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Related science and technology 

message: why isn't this figure in this article?  http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/plss100.jpg  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Britoca (talk • contribs) 01:05, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Why isn't this figure in this article?

message: Some Italian articles about the Moon landings (like this) state that PLSS means Post Landing Survival System. Googling that particular string results in a list of Italian articles (only Italian) and generic abbreviation lists (in English and Chinese). So: was the acronym PLSS ever used to mean Post Landing Survival System? If so, when did its meaning change to Primary Life Support System? If not, where does that erroneous information come from, and why is it so diffused in Italy? Devil Master (talk) 18:24, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: In the Apollo program, PLSS always stood for Portable (not "primary") Life Support System, and never anything else. "Primary" is a post-Apollo usage. "Post Landing Survival System" sounds like something somebody made up. Ignorance and gossip are ubiquitous, even in foreign countries. JustinTime55 (talk) 16:16, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Post Landing Survival System?
Talk:Lily Parr

message: The article on Lily Parr is currently being edited. I am researching useful and relevant infomation that can be added, but would welcome contributions.
Fluffball70 10:13, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  comment 

message: Needs references, in-line citations for me to rate it higher than start. It could also stand to be copy-edited.--Bookworm857158367 20:19, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Only took two and a half years, but I've done significant work on the article to bring it up our expected standards. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 09:29, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Rating

message: Findmypast.com suggests Prescot, not St Helens? Clavdia chauchat (talk) 15:01, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthplace 
Category talk:Companies listed on the Australian Securities Exchange

message: A number of the companies included here have been delisted. These should be removed and put on a new list for companies that have been delisted.Inchiquin (talk) 03:11, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delisted companies 

message: Got rid of these two, put them on list of companies formerly listed. Inchiquin (talk) 12:26, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Metal Storm and ABC Learning
Talk:William Napier (VC)

message: In this edit  removed an external link. The link had been present, with the same url, for more than 10 years, but I am now getting a safety warning when I click on it, so i have not followed it. Any more information, please? DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 01:16, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. I wonder when it was done? Hijacking dead-links will fool the bots. I will delete the others I have found. Anthony Staunton (talk) 04:34, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The change was not made in wikipedia,  but in the source site, it seems. Please do not simply delete the usurped links. Instead they should be used to find archived versions, if possible, particularly for those which were begin used as source citations.DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 06:23, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link removal 

message: There is no record of William Napier and Elizabeth Slater's marriage in the Victoria Births, Deaths and Marriages records. Wondering what the source is for this.Seasalt (talk) 14:54, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Lack of citation
Talk:Dental laser

message: There's a surprisingly low amount of information here as this article hasn't been given serious attention in years.  A little more background on the design and function of the lasers would be helpful, especially in comparison to drills.  The implementation, availability, and cost has certainly changed since the publication of the 2 provided sources and needs updating.  Frequency of use for various procedures and the overall outlook for dental lasers would also be appreciated.  Tagging as outdated and photo request. RoadView (talk) 15:29, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs updating/expansion
Talk:Dental syringe

message: I propose that Dental syringe be merged into Syringe. I think that the content in the Dental syringe article is mostly already  explained in the context of Syringe, and the Syringe article is of a reasonable size in which the merging of Dental syringe will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. -- ТимофейЛееСуда.  12:37, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Btw there are a lot of images of dental syringes on commons: commons:Category:Dental syringes, one could be included. --WS (talk) 13:21, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: --WingtipvorteX PTT ∅ 22:50, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Thomas Neely

message: According to several local news articles (don't know which is the original, but  this one is an example, as is this) there was no theft, and the claimant was not the 'rightful owner', who still possessed Neely's Victoria Cross. According to other sources the VC was later sold at auction at Spink of London on November 25th 2010 (about six months after the alleged theft). This version of events is indirectly confirmed by the official Spink catalogue, which lists the medal on auction at November 25th 2010.
: Mojowiha (talk) 16:10, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Theft of Neely's Victoria Cross a hoax? 
Template talk:Ethnic groups in the Philippines

message: Who removed the Filipino Chinese and Spanish Filipino? 23prootie 21:13, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Exclusion

message: The Zamboangueños are neither part of an ethnic group (there are several ethnic groups in this collective group of people) nor a part of any minority group. --Weekeejames 12:11, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zamboangueño 

message: I will include Tasaday in this template. --Sir Jazer 13 (talk) 11:28, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Include Tasaday
Talk:Orthodontic spacer

message: THEY HUUUURRRTTTT LIKE CRRAP!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.120.228.24 (talk) 22:25, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Orthodontic headgear

message: Dear all,
I have noticed a number of exaggerations in the article, which could cause irritation among future patients. I tried to remove the most obvious ones, like "wired-in" head gear, 24/24h wear time, etc.
I would be grateful if an orthodontist or other expert in this area could review this article in order to ensure reliable information for patients.
With kind regards,
Hendric Hendric Stattmann (talk) 07:30, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment about my edit from 2008-07-07 

message: I am performing a copy edit in response to the  tag. I have noticed redundancy in a few sections, not being an expert on this subject it appears some of these sections can either be combined or need to be further distinguished from each other.  dtgriffith ♬♪♩ 19:30, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expert needed to properly develop this article 

message: A headgear is almost NEVER permanently fixed. This has been put by a user (95.144.52.191, I suspect deliberately), and care should be taken so this misinformation will not be put back on the article. Someuser55 (talk) 20:35, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong info 
Talk:Kakuyids

message: Were Kakuyids Kurdish or Deylamite? Names like Kakuyeh and Kalijar are dylamite. So were their overlords and relatives, Buyids. Were does the Kurdish connection come from? mrjahan Feb. 3rd, 2007
Amardi (tabaristan, pre deylam) were called kurds (parthian times), but so was another group (who was not deylamite) and it seems to be a generic term for tent-dwellers (nomads) at first. Zaza people share language feature with deylami, fully not kurd (ethnic groupp)but some claim themselfs, some not. Look at the non mutual kurdish language for a hint that kurd was generic iranian-speakers (like lurs).
So the kurdish connection comes from you reading a modern understanding. Ardashi babak-nameh for western kurd-refrence, and one of the phrates for amardi/nort kurd-refrence. Also laks and lors and bakthiars in lorestan are 3 modern
groupps yet language closer to each other. Just a curiousa, that seems to have been a ban on magic names(soothsayer,magican etc) islamic maybe. Like the yazidis.
Every nation remade their history this century, specially terms.Bennanak88 (talk) 20:08, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Kurdish or Dylamite?
Talk:Onllwyn

message: There's mention of parishes in the article. Are these historical or present? I thought that rather than parish councils, Wales had community councils, so what is Dyffryn Cellwen? A parish, a community, or would "village" be simpler? (And more understandable.)  Telsa (talk) 21:26, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Parishes
Talk:Sarasota School of Architecture

message: The reliance on primary sources (see also :WP:SELFPUB and :WP:BLPSELFPUB) to cite the last two paragraphs of the "Legacy" section should be discussed. Generally, Wikipedia tries to avoid using primary sources to support statements or claims someone/something is saying about themselves/itself since it can be seen as a form of :WP:PROMO. -- Marchjuly (talk) 03:44, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that the sources cited for the last two paragraphs of the Legacy section are strongly promotional. If there is no independent reliable source discussing the legacy of the Sarasota School, then those paragraphs should be removed. - Donald Albury 13:26, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The first of those two paragraphs points out that two organizations exist whose purpose is to preserve Sarasota School of Architecture structures. I am not sure how that can be promotional, if the gist of the paragraph merely acknowledges their existence. Not sure where the 'promotional' aspect lies here. I replaced and added additional footnotes. The second paragraph, I have also replaced footnotes with ones that, hopefully, are less problematic.Architecttype (talk) 02:29, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legacy section
Talk:Vilnius Gediminas Technical University

message: In general, I have no problems with the edits  made before the page was promoted, though I would like to see the alumni section reestablished. The alumni culture is not as strong in Lithuania, so providing the kind of statistics that MIT can is difficult. That said, I came here today to add some alums to the section, so I'm reconstituting it. Moacir (talk) 14:00, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alumni 

message: I created a candidate page to replace the copyright-infringing page at Talk:Vilnius_Gediminas_Technical_University/Temp. The copyright infringing language found on linkedin was identical to the language on VGTU's own "about" pages, but I still edited it all to conform more to Wikipedia's standards by providing extensive documentation, structure, and linking.
I used the MIT page as my model, and have pulled information from both Lithuanian and English VGTU pages as well as (some) from Lithuanian news portals. I tried to target the language a bit towards English-language people who might be interested in VGTU, such as potential ERASMUS students.
There are also orphaned seal and logo files risking getting deleted if the candidate rewrite doesn't get accepted. Moacir (talk) 19:54, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright non-violating candidate page 

message: I see that Vgtu123 has restored the previously embargoed article. I hope that would be because the copyright violations have been settled (in that the offending text belongs not to linkedin, but, rather, to VGTU). Shame that the article is missing what I had added, though.
Moacir (talk) 14:07, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violation
Talk:Scanning probe microscopy

message: I think that NSOM falls under optical microscopy, not scanning probe. I believe it is the most powerful optical technique known, but it is truly optical. Srnec 21:32, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: NSOM might fall under either category, but it is more likely to be scanning probe. Although it uses light, it does not uses lenses, as proper optical microscope should. Image is gathered one point at time. SEM is scanning, but not scanning probe microscope (although also depends on definition). Probe seems to be implied to be hard, material piece. -Yyy 14:00, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Scientific articles are held to a much lower standard than other articles, for citations.  I'm not going to mark every statement that needs a citation, but wanted to point this out and flag the overall article accordingly.TechnoTalk (talk) 00:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Much appreciated!  The scientific citation guidelines are actually more specific than those for regular articles, but since expertise is needed to understand them I guess there's a smaller population of editors able to improve scientific articles.  Any help you can provide, including just tagging statements that need citations, is appreciated! Antony–22 (talk⁄contribs) 03:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

text: (Also, Template:Refimprove science may be of use.) Antony–22 (talk⁄contribs) 03:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations
Talk:Tinbergen's four questions

message: Tinbergen’s four questions on animal behavior are already discussed in three Wikipedia articles:
Nikolaas_Tinbergen, 
behavioral ecology, and 
ethology.
Actually, these 4 levels of analysis can be applied to any biological phenomenon, not only behaviour, as the "periodic table" below indicates. I have not seen this "periodic table" anywhere else, but it makes sense to me. George A. Lozano  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.190.47.64 (talk) 16:31, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've rated this article B class, but it barely meets the criteria. Inline citations and a graphic in the lead will keep the article class at a solid B. Justin chat 19:02, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Rating 

message: Are there reliable sources that discuss Tinbergen's four questions explicitly using this periodic table analogy? Pete.Hurd (talk) 17:38, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "periodic table"?
Talk:Saturday Starship

message: I thought the show was just called Saturday Starship (no 'The'). However I have been unable to find any conclusive evidence either way. Therefore I created this page Saturday Starship as a redirect to the existing one (The Saturday Starship), and if it does turn out to be Saturday Starship, we could just move the content to this page and point the redirect back the other way. Jameboy 21:40, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Exact name of show
Talk:Geode

message: what are crystals?
Oh, they're baby koalas. Dobe 75.26.204.27 01:10, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: It's not clear to me that this picture actually shows any geodes, there appears to be a folded and boudinaged competent layer, but nothing that looks like a geode in my opinion, any other views? Mikenorton (talk) 16:04, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: OK after a bit of research, the folding is due to slumping in the Fort Payne Formation and the sequence is well known for its geodes, but I still can't identify any on the picture, so I'll remove it, unless there are objections. Mikenorton (talk) 15:45, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture of geodes at outcrop 

message: What gas is found inside geodes before they're opened? Or does it vary? Please add! -- 77.187.41.231 (talk) 15:16, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  What gas is in them? 

message: With several crystal caves being discovered, are these all geodes? The one in Mexico  Cave of the Crystals seems much larger than the one in Spain or USA, if it is also a geode. -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 22:32, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Crystal caves

message: It's trash. I'm gonna rewrite it, and then people can comment here telling me why I am such a moron because I misinterpreted the volcanic deposition mechanism, or whatever. --WhittleMario (talk) 17:58, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewriting the Introduction 

message: where was the first geode found 2600:1702:5220:7D00:356E:B287:E032:4DFC (talk) 01:52, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  geode