lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Al Ewing

message: I've seen Al Ewing's beard, and it's rubbish.  Alan Moore, now that's a good beard. Vizjim 12:10, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Al's beard

message: OK just to keep track, so far we have had:
*Alfred Robert Ewing
*Alasdair David Ewing
*Alvin Ewing
The last one sounding like an obscure cast member  from Dallas. So, as much fun as the "Al is For..." game is (for the record, I had my money on "Alabama" although "Algonquin" and "Al-Iteration" have a certain appeal), it looks like we are going to need a source before we accept any further suggestions. (Emperor (talk) 02:33, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Al =  

message: 2006 is hardly recent now, is it ? -- Beardo (talk) 21:19, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent ? 
Talk:Harry Oppenheimer

message: How could he have resigned as chairman in 2001 if he died in 2000?— Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.95.1.36 (talk • contribs) 03:01, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the sentence refers to his son ... please sign your posts. Elf-friend 10:40, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resigned after death? 
Talk:Trends (journals)

message: Some of the statements in the section on history could do with references. Espresso Addict 06:03, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Referencing 

message: I have just deleted as spam the whole series of articles on the individual journals which were quite obviously Elsevier spam. I will recreate them as redirects to this page. Pascal.Tesson 23:43, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree most of the previous subpages were created by Elsevier; however, it seems to be usual policy to allow articles for review journals of this type. What would your thoughts on recreation of a set of non-promotional stub pages? Several of the Trends journals have very high impact factors and, for categorising purposes, different pages would be useful, as they are all in different areas.  Espresso Addict 08:10, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I propose to reconstruct articles for every one o these journals. Elsevier may have written the original, but they are in their own right reach of them notable journals with independenet titles and independent impact factors--some very high. They meet every plausible condition for notability .   DGG ( talk ) 06:39, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: by our current guidelines on notability of journals, they would certainly each be notable.  DGG ( talk ) 01:19, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletions and redirects
Talk:Fort Albany First Nation

message: I took out the sentence Part of the original settlement is now the territory of the Kashechewan First Nation., as I don't believe this to be true.  Both communities are recognized as separate First Nations.  If both are related from previous history, Fort Albany was recognized first and Kashechewan appeared later.  If anyone has more information on this please post a message.  I know some of the history from this area as I am from the James Bay coast.  
--sapiyeh 03:02, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I did some quick research on the internet and found a short explanation on the Chiefs of Ontario website on the history of Fort Albany and Kashechewan and added this note to the article.  Hopefully it will clear up any confusion.  If anyone has further information please post their change to the article or to this discussion page.  --sapiyeh 20:54, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fort Albany And Kashechewan Are Separate First Nations 
Talk:China Federation for Defending the Diaoyu Islands

message: *Japanese news sources/articles on the organisation and the incident on March 24, 2004.
*Does the organisation have a website?
Hong Qi Gong 03:03, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needed for expansion 

message: I've edited out "should be under Chinese administration" and replaced it with "is a part of Chinese territory".  This group does not think that Diaoyu Islands should be under Chinese jurisdiction/rule/administration/etc.  It maintains that Diaoyu Islands is a part of Chinese territory.  Hong Qi Gong 06:52, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "is", not "should be" 

message: I changed the terminology in the article to conform to the main page for the islands, and added some additional information anout the 2004 landing.  Alexwoods 20:33, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changed to conform to [[Senkaku Islands]]
Talk:Bradley Smith (racing driver)

message: I have removed the speedy delete tag. The West Coast Eagles team competes in the Australian Football League, the highest level competition for Australian rules football.  This person therefore meets the basic sportsperson notability criterion of competing at the highest level available in his sport. Jachin, If you still contest the notability of this person, you may take it to WP:AFD. Snottygobble 12:06, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy delete tag
Talk:Humanists International

message: Following an edit war, the issues raised on this page were referred to the Mediation Cabal.
*IHEU Mediation case page
In the mediation, it was determined that comments that serve only as a record of misperception and rancor ought to be removed – some sections of this page have been edited and some removed in order to accomplish this. In creating the edited version, I tried to retain the substance of the discussion while removing snark, rancor, redundancy, and extraneous digressions. Edited sections are marked with a (*). The version prior to this edit may be found here. I hope all parties find my edit acceptable.
--plover 14:31, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Mediation

message: A call for volunteers. The IHEU adminstrator has just added a bunch of very useful information linked to the IHEU About page. I've fixed up the Presidents/Chairman section, and added the Awards. I've also linked existing Wikipedia articles to this people on this page, and reverse linked to this page from those existing Wikipedia people articles.
One page that I haven't had time to tackle just yet is  the IHEU Biographies page. This is a useful starting point for anyone wanting to write biography articles on notable IHEU and Humanist personalities. --Couttsie 06:08, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: IHEU Biographies

message: 'Humanism' (as a stand-alone term) is capitalized throughout this article. I don't think there is any need to capitalize it except when it is part of the name of an organization. Jojalozzo 03:36, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalization of 'humanism' 
Talk:Ellsworth P. Bertholf

message: Somebody who knows how needs to fix the succession box for this article. --TommyBoy 03:23, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Succession Box 

message: See Commandant of the Coast Guard and Talk:United States Revenue Cutter Service for the discussion on the origin and lineage of the office and the number of officeholders.  Current Commandant Allen is cited as the 23rd Commandant.  If that is so, then Bertholf is number 4, not first.  This coincides tracing the lineage of the office of the commandant to the chief of the Revenue Cutter Service, Chief Shepard in 1889.  While Commandant Bertholf may have, in fact, been the first commandant of the newly formed Coast Guard in 1915, the office itself pre-dated the Coast Guard in its predecessor entities.--G1076 05:34, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commandant of the Coast Guard lineage 

message: I see bday shown as May 7th on this reference: Billymac00 (talk) 23:19, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Verify date of birth 

message: The numbering of the Commandants of the Coast Guard has caused confusion on several articles dealing with the early Revenue Cutter Service.  If one starts with Bertholf as the first Commandant, the numbering is thrown off in his sucessors articles.  The Coast Guard starts numbering the Commandants with Shepard, regardless of what the agency was called.  This is done to coincide with Shepard being the first military head of the service since before the Civil War.  This numbering is the one used by the Coast Guard Historians Office and is the logic used by me to change the articles on Shepard, Shoemaker, Ross, Bertholf et. al. Revisions of articles by me will continue to use numbering used by the Historians Office so as to eliminate confusion to readers of both Wikipedia and the Coast Guard's web site. Cuprum17 (talk) 17:34, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Numbering of Commandants of the Coast Guard 

message: Although Bertholf served in the United States Coast Guard during World War I era, no reliable sources found as of yet state that he served overseas during the war. Accordingly, :Category:American military personnel of World War I was removed from the article. Semper Fi! FieldMarine (talk) 14:15, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: World War I service
Category talk:Nuclear safety and security

message: We need a main article on Nuclear safety. The link now redirects to Safety Culture, but this is not a good solution. -- Petri Krohn 03:26, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure, but it's not going to happen. Nuclear safety is neutral enough, thanks. --Woohookitty(cat scratches) 18:26, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Main article
Talk:Bring On the Night

message: I reverted the edits by TUF-KAT because he used improper title capitalization in changing the title from Bring On the Night to Bring on the Night.  From the WikiProject Music style guide:
*In titles of songs or albums, unless it is unique, the standard rule in the English language is to capitalize words that:
#Are the first word in the title
#Are not conjunctions (and, but, or, nor), prepositions (to, over, through), articles (an, a, the), or the "to" in infinitives.
In this case, the word "on" serves as an indirect object of the verb "bring", so it does not qualify as a preposition in this context and should be capitalized. Aguerriero 14:02, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title capitalization 

message: Shouldn't the documentary film of the same title be mentioned?  Badagnani 21:55, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Film 
Talk:Self-Monitoring, Analysis and Reporting Technology

message: I have issues with this statement:
"NVMe specification has defined unified S.M.A.R.T. attributes for different drive manufacturers."
The NVMe standard does not assign IDs to the SMART attributes. In fact I see no such definitions in the standard.
See page 122:
https://nvmexpress.org/wp-content/uploads/NVM-Express-1_4-2019.06.10-Ratified.pdf
The IDs used in this wiki appear to be those which have been arbitrarily assigned by the author of CrystalDiskInfo. Other software assigns different IDs. For example, the author of AIDA64 has chosen to use the byte position of the attribute as its ID.
In the case of Media and Data Integrity Errors, CrystalDiskInfo assigns an ID of 0x0E whereas AIDA64 assigns an ID of 160. Smartctl (smartmontools) does not display any IDs.
Furthermore, there are many more attributes in the standard than are listed in the wiki.
See Figure 194: Get Log Page – SMART / Health Information Log (page 122). 106.69.64.155 (talk) 03:19, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Known NVMe S.M.A.R.T. attributes 

message: Nowhere in the article are these terms defined.  And I am not talking about specific values of these numbers; I just mean the most basic, sort-of dictionary meaning of each.  In particular, I am curious to understand the meaning of "WORST" (not "worst," just to be precise here).  Does it mean the worst number that "VALUE" has ever attained?  Or is it merely a warning value that never changes?
I notice that on my own drives, the "WORST" number does not seem to change, at least for some attributes, and this may have to do with vendor-specific issues.
Please don't answer with a request for specific values I am seeing for "WORST"--think of my request like this:  "Chair" -- a furnishing for sitting on.  Not, "well, it depends when one is sitting on the chair," or "how wide is the person's butt?"  Generic definition, or what the original intent was, and maybe a bit about how each vendor has implemented "WORST."
Thank you.
73.116.44.30 (talk) 00:23, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  BASIC definitions of "VALUE" "WORST" "THRESH"
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Shawshank pee

message: When does a neologism cease to be a neologism and become a bona fide expression? It seems that the editors of this fine website do nothing other than a "Google" search as means of verifying evidence. Does a phrase have to be found on a certain number of other sites to be considered notable? Who is this body that makes the executive decision if something is worth recording? I realize that it would be ridiculous to record every phrase that every tenth grader makes up: "Pulling a Parnham" or whatever that article was titled. However, this phrase is not something that I made up. I would also like to note that I am not a high school student either. I have merely heard the phrase around the city I live in (Kitchener, Ontario), as well as neighboring cities. I decided that after an unsuccessful search on Wikipedia for the proper definition, I would construct it myself. Yes, it is my first article, but I don't think that the article should be thrown out because it was written my a "newbie", as one of the editors put it. I also realize that this submission more than likely looks like a feeble attempt by a teenage kid trying desperately to keep his faux article from getting deleted by using language he thinks seems sophisticated. Nevertheless, the phrase in question is, to the best of my knowledge, a real phrase. I've said all I can in defense of the article. I will now leave it to the editors of the website to do as they see fit. Enots1
*A quick search on google turns up nothing. Fightindaman 04:47, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Progg music

message: Progg and Progg music are practically identical. Progg is a stub which seems to be about the cultural/leftist movement in Sweden from the 70s, whereas Progg music is a larger article focusing on the genre of progg music. They should probably be merged, and as Progg music is the larger article, add a note to it about other types of Progg? Jude(talk,contribs) 03:38, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Progg]] merge with [[Progg music]]
Talk:Monastery of Stoudios

message: The text states that Abbot Nicholas' first term was from 848-845. He couldn't have begun his term before it ended. Does anyone have access to the correct dates? MishaPan 14:54, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Dates of Nicholas' Abbacy

message: My experience is limited, but I have never seen them as anything other than Studites in English. 209.128.15.10 (talk) 11:50, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Stoudites"?
Talk:Florida State Road 14

message: There is a "TRUCK 14" reassurance shield southbound on 53 at the 53/14 intersection. (Oddly there is no "SOUTH 53" shield...) - Aerobird 03:55, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Signage 

message: Sorry about the tags, but two articles with a total of three sentences about two short Florida State Roads would have problems with RfD (and we dodged bullets with Florida State Road 300 and Florida State Road 678).  To increase the survivability of another challenge, I'd recommend merging State Road 14 Truck (Florida) with this article (as SR 14 is the parent road) and fleshing out both sections.  I did something like that when I incorporated two other FSRs into my Florida State Road 30A article. B.Wind 19:23, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup and merge tags 
Talk:Swedish Touring Car Championship

message: Please note that Springfield Technical Community College is also commonly referred to using the abbriviation "STCC", which redirects to this article.  Perhaps a disambiguation page should be added?
--68.118.255.186 22:42, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done Recury 18:36, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  STCC Redirection 

message: Why does this page have strange flags all over it? This is different from every other motorsports article. --Pc13 (talk) 15:55, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Flags
Talk:Database Administration

message: I would like to know if the term recoverability as used in the article be a reference to one of the following:
* Backup
* Data recovery
* Disaster recovery
* Near Continuous Backup
* Continuous data protection
If that is the case, would it be appropriate to have the link simply redirect to that article? Folajimitalk—Preceding undated comment added 03:56, 28 February 2006‎
: The above edit refers to THIS version of the page. wbm1058 (talk) 08:54, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recoverabilty 

message: A fork is stored in the history of this page; THIS 23:05, 26 June 2006 version is the most recent version of the fork. – wbm1058 (talk) 08:54, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content fork
File talk:I-80 Eastshore Fwy.jpg

message: thats on a SATURDAY?!? Dobby421 (talk) 01:54, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: the traffic portrayed here is what we natives PRAY for each day. this is NOTHING for us. ps, emeryville is in the background (towers) berkeley's Aquatic Park (Berkeley) to the left.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 07:13, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  wow
Talk:Visual language

message: From what I know of active imagination, this is incorrect. Active Imagination is a way of working with dreams, allowing them to unfold in all sensory channels, not only visual. There is a connection between visual language and active imagination, but it is tenous and they are not by any means the same.
This article had ben started and I thought was too important not to develop it. All comments welcome to improve it.
paula clare --Paula Clare 17:35, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Active imagination 

message: I removed this bit just now as I found it incoherent.  If someone later feels it's important and can rework it, here 'tis:
" to gather the mass of memory data: fleeting images or parts of images and sounds; into communicable language.  "  Figma 17:46, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  removed from article 

message: If thought processes in composing written text is of interest to researchers in Visual Language, than differences between "unsaved" edit versions of a wiki article would provide voluminous data using a large site like Wikipedia.  Would MediaWiki need to be further "instrumented" to allow these intra-edit changes to be logged.
See Language_production#Speech_Errors and Speech_error.
-- anonymous former linguistic undergrad —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.17.151.250 (talk) 19:38, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wiki editing as Visual Language 

message: * This edit is copy/pasetd here from this article. -- Mdd (talk) 21:39, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy-paste registration
Talk:Brachialis muscle

message: The article claims that Brachialis produces 50% more force than Biceps Brachii. A secondary citation is provided to Saladin Anatomy & Physiology. However, the Saladan A&P textbook gives no source for this claim. I have attempted to search Google Scholar to find verification for this claim and have been unsuccessful which leads me to suspect that the claim may be untrue or unverified. Android9097 (talk) 23:37, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The force production of Brachialis relative to Biceps Brachii
Talk:Komatiite

message: It is worth discussing this first.
For instance, the Dachine diamond occurrence is within a talc-schist, which is a metamorphosed ultramafic rock. It is therefore not sufficient to say that because the rock geochemically meets the criteria of a komatiite that it is a komatiite.
For instance Magee and Taylor (1999) here argue that the Dachine talc-schist is actually probably a shoshonite occurrence. From my knowledge of the ultramafic dykes of Gympie, Australia, which were also shoshonites, these can look extremely similar to komatiites, especially when alteration strips away their LILE element enrichments in Ba, Rb, Sr, etc. So, I, for one, would like to see a definitive reference provided before we re-include the Dachine rocks as an example of a komatiite source rock for diamonds.
However, if it is a shoshonite, this makes for VERY interesting reading because shoshonites are much more widespread than kimberlites, komatiites or lamprites...so thanks whoever brought this to our attention!
Rolinator 04:19, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  French Guyana komatiitic diamonds 

message: The article said komatiites were erupted as Superfluids. I think the author meant Supercritical Fluid, a liquid that has properties of both a gas and a liquid. --Diamonddavej (talk) 21:49, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Superfluid? 

message: I did not check the whole article, but the "Morphology and occurrence" paragraph was undoubtedly copied word by word from Earth System Sciences: Felicitation Volumes in Honour of Professor V. K. Verma. Avihu (talk) 16:49, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The "Morphology and occurrence" section of this Wikipedia article as of 20 January 2013 was almost identical to the version as of 28 November 2008. The book "Earth System Sciences: Felicitation Volumes in Honour of Professor V. K. Verma" was first published in 2009. Therefore, it seems that the book is probably an uncredited copy of this Wikipedia article. GeoWriter (talk) 15:21, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright? 
Talk:An American Girl in Paris, Part Deux

message: is no one going to post a synopsis?  i was always wondering how the show ended
:I will do one for each episode eventually, but I have to get the discs first. I haven't seen the show recently, so I can't do the synopsis from memory. Koweja 13:07, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:United States congressional delegations from Kansas

message: As of this moment, Kansas seems to be the only State whose Senate information page has been completely integrated into its Delegations page (leaving only a redirect behind). Should the others be modeled similarly? ~ Ross (ElCharismo) 21:26, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: *No. I once thought yes. But now I think that there are some good reasons to have as many as three pages:
# U.S. Congressional Delegations from Foo
# List of United States Senators from Foo, and
# List of United States Representatives from Foo.
—User_talk:Markles 22:15, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *After some consideration, I'd have to say I agree with that sentiment. ~ Ross (ElCharismo) 04:17, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of Gargoyles episodes

message: In case anyone is wondering... The reason there's only pictures up until episode 26 of season 2 is because that's all the episodes I own on DVD. If and when volume 2 of season 2 is released I will add those pictures. Until then, I'm inviting anyone and everyone to donate screen shots of the respective episodes. Please be sure you have the correct episode that is needed. The rest I should be able to handle myself.
For anyone inputting images, please name them as follows: "Gargoyles(Ani)YxZZ.JPG" where Y is season # and ZZ is episode #.
So for Example: Gargoyles(Ani)2x20.JPG
If anyone wants to input the image they uploaded, please put it as 130px.
NetStormer 04:25, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

message: The use of images are not in compliance with our ridiculous policy to protect the machine and has been removed. Please restore them to regain our humanity. -Mask? 23:22, 4 June 2003 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use removal 
Talk:The Visit (Loreena McKennitt album)

message: Ludus released also an album called The Visit, in 1980.  I entered a short article with the tracklist at "The Visit (Ludus album)".  I think this should be retitled "The Visit (Loreena McKennitt album)"?  The Ludus page was incorrectly linking to this page about the McKennit album.  Cheers. Math Tinder 04:29, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've unlinked this as a) the page for the band "Ludus" has been moved, and b) "The Visit" is an EP, not an album. So the answer to this question was probably No, it'd be better to correctly link the album on the band page... Swanny18 (talk) 13:03, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: (First comment)

message: :Done Nekura 19:01, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled