lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of court cases involving the American Civil Liberties Union

message: It would be nice if this article gave a brief statement about each case (the name tells us nothing), so readers would have some idea of what each case was about without having to go to each case's article. It would be especially helpful for someone looking for a particular case/subject whose name they don't know. -R. fiend 17:05, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The article is a “List” of cases involving the ACLU. It suffices to present a case listing by presenting the names of the contending parties – that is the standard in case listing! What you request is a summary of cases; these would be subject to a lot of editing by viewers or editors; it would quickly lead to a lengthy fragmented argumentative article. Moshe-paz 11:41, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've added a list in alphabetical order.  I understand it is a hassle to add cases twice, but I think the utility outweighs the hassle.  See also Wikipedia_talk:Categorization#Category_for_legal_cases_that_ACLU_is_involved_in.3F,  and also Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2008_April_12#Category:Court_cases_litigated_by_the_American_Civil_Liberties_Union which more or less rules out the use of categories for this group of cases.   Categories would provide an alphabetical grouping ... so, since that is out, an alpha list here is a good alternative.  Also, I note that the two lists (chrono and alpha) are not identical.  But that is a symptom of the underlying problem (i.e. that more work needs to be done to make them complete) than an issue with including the alpha list. --Noleander (talk) 18:41, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alphabetization
Talk:DH postcode area

message: Is there a source for DH98 being used by BT? It's quite plausible, and I'm pretty sure DH97 is used by the passport office and DH99 by National Savings next door. I wouldn't want to put these in the table without some evidence that this is their exclusive purpose. 17:07, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Non-geographical districts
Talk:Evolutionarily significant unit

message: The title of this article needs to be changed.  Should be Evolutionarily not Evolutionary. Busaccsb 17:07, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I was wondering about that too. Done. —Pengo 07:15, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title 
Talk:Consolidated NY

message: The image :Image:NY-1B.jpg has been deleted per category for speedy deletion, criteria I4. The image may be freely uploaded again if a source and correct copyright tag are given, and a fair use rationale (if appropriate). KiloT 18:39, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image deletion as of 8th August
Talk:Shinjuku Incident

message: Mostly wondering where the rating is? Kyle van der Meer (talk) 02:11, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Hurricanes

message: The top portion of the article needs to be rewritten and cited, the thing that confuses me is the blog-like post at the bottom. What purpose does it have in this article? I am not familiar with this band, so I am not qualified to rewrite it. I tagged it and hopefully someone else will make the necessary changes. MrPrada 17:19, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Isosorbide mononitrate

message: The structure of the compound is incorrect, the ONO2 substituent should be in upward position. Cf. Chemspider, PubChem or any monograph.2001:738:3000:22FE:0:0:0:27 (talk) 15:49, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrecct struture
Talk:Drew Doughty

message: The main picture is really old. And he looks fat. Very unflattering. There's gotta be something better. 63.200.6.92 (talk) 04:09, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: We would require a freely licensed image, such as one explicitly released to the public domain or under a compatible Creative Commons licence (CC0, CC-BY, CC-BY-SA).  The easiest way to do this is for someone to take a photo themselves and upload it. i.e.: the current photo is one of mine.  However, I can't guarantee I can get a new pic this season. Resolute 15:11, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture? 
Talk:Computer and Internet Protocol Address Verifier

message: Since this just hit the news, and my own searches came up with very little besides the initial news articles, I decided to create this stub article.  Its my first stub, and first to include citations, so please forgive any mistakes of not understanding the process. I did try to at least search for an use examples from other stub articles. Any tips or links for creating better stubs, etc, would be appreciated. I think the article has a split-infinitive in it. I'm not sure if thats exceptable or not. :-) --Mespinola 17:22, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub

message: Whether it requires a wiretap warrant or not, its installation by exploiting a security hole on a victim's machine would appear to be blatantly illegal, in violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act in particular. This isn't running a red light with the sirens on -- this is a clear violation of the principle of rule of law on which all civilized countries are, in part, founded.
Emplacing it purely by "social engineering" would seem to be a fuzzier matter though; an interesting case to test some day in court.
:Wikipedia is not a discussion forum. -- Beland (talk) 19:04, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legality 
Talk:Faith Fenton

message: I have assessed this as Start Class, because it contains more detail and organization than would be expected from a Stub Class, and of low importance, as I do not feel many people outside of the field of education would be familiar with the subject of the article. Cheers, CP 16:01, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: Which one?  The source is unclear.  It's possible somebody with access to the Globe and Mail archives from the 1890s could figure it out, but the source I used is unclear. WilyD 13:20, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Oliver Wendell Holmes
Talk:Dextrorphan

message: Should dextrorphan be classified an opioid, with Ki's ranging from 420 to >1,000 nM?
Or is this only formaly because of the "pseudomorphinan" skeleton?--84.163.97.230 18:07, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, it should:) Pethidine has even lower affinities. Sorry for the monologue.--84.163.97.230 18:09, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As far as I recall, opioids are drugs that act on opioid receptors, not simply chemicals that are related to morphine in structure.  As dextrorphan doesn't seem to possess mu-opioid receptor activity, it's not an opioid.AlkaloidMan (talk) 10:02, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opioid? 

message: So I noticed that the space filling model is wrong in one spot: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Dextrorphan_3d.gif
At the top where the oxygen (red) comes off of one of the benzene ring carbons (grey). The model shows both a hydrogen (white) AND oxygen atom on the same carbon, there should be no hydrogen on that carbon.
I have no idea how to make make those models, but that caught my eye for whoever could fix it. Skier51907 (talk) 22:13, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Space Filling Model 

message: I'm not good with graphics or I would correct this. It's not so much a problem, but the molcular structures for DXO and DXM are oriented completely differently from one and another. This makes it very difficult for someone to see the structural similarities/differences. It would be nice if they could be oriented the same way. --Jmcclare (talk) 20:44, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistent Molecular Structure Orientation 

message: I typed "DXO" into chemicalize.org's embedded molecule rendered/drawing tool and got, not dextrorphan, but this:
I suppose a disambiguation page is called for? I know not what this structure is, however, otherwise I'd do it myself. Nagelfar (talk) 21:12, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  DXO? Simpler molecule structure more prevalent to name?
Talk:Brains (Thunderbirds)

message: The real name of Brains is never revealed. Hiram K. Hackenbacker was just an alias used in one episode. The article needs to be corrected to reflect this. Andy120290 17:23, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this page should probably be renamed/moved to just "Brains (Thunderbirds) or something similar. From what I remember, the Hackenbacker name was mistakenly given as Brains' real name in some related media (comics, books, etc.) I think it's clear from the episode that the name is just an alias - hence the episode title. Any objections?
Bobfos 22:14, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I Agree. Andy120290 22:43, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name not right

message: The line about the childhood of the character called 'Brains', should read 'family's' and not "families".
Can somebody please correct?
Thanks.
John Porcella195.194.36.193 (talk) 13:44, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I've given the article a general clean-up. Please do feel free to make further corrections or additions yourself - it's the encyclopaedia that anyone can edit! SuperMarioMan 14:50, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling/Grammar 

message: It is stated on the complete Thunderbirds DVD collection Thunderbirds companion DVD that Brains and most of the other characters were British but given American accents in order to sell Thunderbirds to American tv markets, should the nationality therefore be changed to reflect this?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Billabongodrum (talk • contribs) 13:57, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nationality
Talk:Budesonide

message: I've found conflicting reports of the FDA pregnancy category for this drug.  Please see reference: http://www.rxlist.com/cgi/generic/budesonide_wcp.htm
Thank you  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.177.33.33 (talk) 22:36, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  FDA category B or C 

message: The misuse section seems to be more about misuse of Medicare/Insurance fraud than misuse of this particular product. Maybe it should be removed? Or re-labelled "In the news" or something.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.148.172.201 (talk) 08:50, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think it's important enough to meet WP:WEIGHT or keep in the article. Does anybody have a reason to keep it in? --Nbauman (talk) 06:15, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misuse Section 

message: The 'Use' section does not mention the fact that the drug is also used to treat rhinitis even though this is clearly mentioned in the introductory paragraph of the article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Belnac (talk • contribs) 10:15, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use section 

message: I am not a wikipedia editor.
Maybe you want to add informations about eosinophilic oesophagitis and Jorveza.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eosinophilic_esophagitis
https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/EPAR/jorveza
https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc/product/9446/smpc
https://www.drfalkpharma-benelux.eu/sites/www.drfalkpharma-benelux.nl/files/01-2018-BNL%20Press%20release%20Jorveza.pdf  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.49.65.123 (talk) 09:07, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  eosinophilic oesophagitis 

message: In this section we have
"Distribution: 2.2-3.9 L/kg"
What is that actually supposed to say?
John G Hasler (talk) 23:15, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pharmacokinetics section 

message: — Assignment last updated by Benadryl Submarine (talk) 07:04, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: PHMD 2040 Service - Learning Spring 2024
Talk:Maria Akraka

message: Huh? She was born in "London, Greater London"? London is Greater London, and has been as such before she was born. 85.217.21.121 (talk) 13:56, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bicalutamide

message: This article focuses quite a bit on the potential dangers of blocking androgen receptors.  But I think most of the discussion is misplaced - for example, it is not highly relevant to detail the dangers of this class of drug to a developing fetus when the use of the drug is contraindicated in women and children.  Some context for the contraindications is necessary, but the discussion is excessive in my opinion.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 22:45, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that the physiology section was a bit excessive.  I have condensed the section to focus on the target population which hopefully removes the POV problems.  Cheers.  Boghog2 (talk) 02:47, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: POV problems

message: What ref supports this "and in the treatment of other androgen-dependent conditions"? The prior refs did not support it except for maybe priapism. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 09:21, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Ref
Talk:Pengtoushan culture

message: This article is repeated verbatim on "ChinaCultureMall" http://ccm-test-0518.chinaculturemall.com/crafts/article.aspx?id=1300  I don't know if CCM copied it from here, or the wiki author copied it from there.
Preceding comment by 24.106.197.146, July 2007
:Glancing at a few of their pages, I think CCM is taking pages from here, not vice versa. Thomas Kluyver (talk) 16:00, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tenofovir disoproxil

message: Our plan to improve the Tenofovir page:
* 	Introduction: Will make the introduction a 3-4 paragraph lead with summarized information. Will include pertinent information such as class, side effects, costs, indication, mechanism of action, and relevant history.
* 	Medical Uses: Will adjust formatting. Include an overview of treatments using Tenofovir before putting more in depth information. 
* 	Adverse Effects: Improve citations. Will remove primary source and single-study information. 
* 	Interactions: Will investigate about interactions with Tenofovir with emphasis on medications that are often used in combination for treatments. 
* 	Pharmacology: Will try to improve comprehension with lay language. 
* 	Pharmacokinetics: Will check sources and only include confirmed facts. Will try to find English sources for the English Wikipedia. 
* 	Drug forms: Will update on available forms. 
* 	Chemistry: Will consider the role of this section in reference to the individuals who may access the page. Will try to improve on lay language and link to sources of complicated topics such as liquid chromatography.
Merctang (talk) 18:48, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wiki Project Plan of Action 

message: STUDENT 1 - "Does the draft submission reflect a neutral point of view? If not, specify…"
After reviewing the Wiki page I believe that the submission is from a neutral point of view. It does nothing to promote or defame Tenofovir. It comes from a stance of delivering unbiased knowledge that allows the person reading the article to make their own decision. Bsalce (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 23:08, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer Review 2016
Talk:Black powder substitute

message: Pyrodex powder works great with my 50 Cal rifle. But is there nmore punch" in blackpowder?Dated/Decided! Sn.June28,2009 21st centDr.Edson Andre' Johnson D.D.ULC>SWORDINHAND (talk) 01:24, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: What about corrosion? After combustion, potassium perchlorate gives potassium chloride which is very corrosive to metals... --FK1954 (talk) 17:15, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The cleaning regimen for Pyrodex is similar to that for cartridge ammunition using the old-fashioned corrosive primers which also contained potassiium chlorate: water to dissolve and remove the chloride salts from the barrel and exposed metal surfaces of the action, followed by oiling (and periodic inspection). (This is also common practice when using traditional black powder.) Naaman Brown (talk) 15:43, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: More punch

message: The article appears to focus on Pyrodex and may need to be changed to reflect this. otherwise, including more information on black powder substitutes other than Pyrodex may be needed Rotarypants (talk) 15:47, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: https://alliantpowder.com/products/powder/blackmz.aspx perhaps? GiggyMantis (talk) 12:17, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  topic change
Talk:Demeclocycline

message: According to Elks et al. and Chopra et al. Demeclocycline is NOT a semisynthetic drug.  Instead it is produced naturally by a genetically modified strain of Streptomyces.  The author of the cited review, I. Chopra, used to work for one of the leading manufacturers of this compound, even more as a specialist for tetracyclines, who published many more papers on this topic. He must have known this. Same is also supported by the DailyMed entry.  (I updated the existing link.)  J. M. Hall, however who just made a short lexicon entry, most likely mistook her statement form the fact that the drug is used for producing semisynthetic derivatives like Minocycline and Doxycycline. The entry in Dorland's Medical Dictionary is not available anymore.  Thus, I took off the latter two references, which obviously are misleading and simply removed the statement that Demeclocycline is semisynthetic.--Asigler (talk) 22:20, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Demeclocycline is NOT semisynthetic
Talk:Meclofenoxate

message: It's also good for hippies.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.222.118.127 (talk) 21:25, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good for hippies 
Talk:Troy (horse)

message: British sources in the late seventies and early eighties are miserably thin. This is the best I can do for now. This is the horse who is largely responsible for turning me into a complete horse racing "anorak", and so is indirectly responsible for 100+ articles. Tigerboy1966 (talk) 22:23, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Chlortetracycline

message: When approved for US or UK ? - Rod57 (talk) 02:47, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  When clinically approved ? 

message: The link for Dr. Subba Rao will take you to an article on Dr. Subbarao.
My guess is that it is some purist who separated the names and it may be correct but if all the printed matter at Lederle and Harvard use the Americanized spelling then Wikipedia should also use Subbarao.MisterHOP (talk) 21:45, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dr. Subba Rao versus Dr. Subbarao
Talk:Fleshbot

message: I noticed that the Gawker Media article lists this blog as "formerly owned by", in addition to noticing its omission from being linked/connected to the other Gawker blogs. So the question is, which article is current in the information? --99.186.111.95 (talk) 03:25, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Still owned by Gawker Media? 

message: The source for the statement about the WHOIS record appears to be dynamic. Is there a way to archive it? Wank Hilliams (talk) 00:50, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  WHOIS record 

message: This entry sorely needs updating. The site has changed significantly,not least of which is that it's a pale version of itself and almost completely composed of advertising masked as "articles." It's terrible. 150.135.165.33 (talk) 17:24, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updating entry
Talk:Piroxicam

message: There seems to be a current study (published or prepublished late November/early December 2007) that gives more detail on adverse effects and seems to conclude they're more serious than believed. Maybe it will pop up on the NSAID article first. I don't have any details except that some German health insurances are as of 2007-11-30 warning patient not to take Piroxicam if alternatives exist. Dysmorodrepanis (talk) 12:04, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Side effects update

message: The flags next to each country are kind of a nice touch I guess, but are they really needed? This format is not really used in most articles unless the flag is next to the title of a list of countries in a table format. It's not earth shatteringly distracting or anything, but perhaps slightly unnecessary. Simplistic Linguist (talk) 15:25, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Are the flags necessary?

message: The structure shown does not comply with the IUPAC name. The upper OH and =O should be interchanged.190.196.59.35 (talk) 16:20, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong Structure 

message: — Assignment last updated by JustinxLane (talk) 19:04, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: PHMD 2040 Service - Learning Spring 2023
Category talk:Articles needing coordinates

message: I've tagged one month's category as db-catempty, but I'm not certain that's the right thing to do.  It seems to me that a bot should be doing it once all subcategories are voided.LeadSongDog 17:37, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

message: It appears that if you go to Google Maps, right-click on the map and select "What's here" it will give you the coordinates - apparently (according to our article) as WGS 84, which is what the  template uses. Google Maps also has a "LatLng Marker" feature which will give the coords as a tooltip. Is Google Maps sufficiently reliable for us to use it as the sole source of coords, or do we need to confirm the value by other means? I check a couple of locations - Google Maps vs Wikipedia - including one that I had personally determined with my GPS navigation device, and they were reasonably close.  Admittedly, I was only checking that my interpretation of the coordinates was correct, rather than that they were accurate. If Google Maps is deemed sufficiently reliable, it makes it very easy for anyone to put coordinates into articles, without having to have a GPS unit or even to go there. Mitch Ames (talk) 05:57, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: A discussion on the  talk page suggests that the answer is "yes", with some constraints. Mitch Ames (talk) 03:03, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is Google Maps a reliable source for coords? 

message: A state is easy to pin the central part.
A railway line ? It has it's parts and they'd have coords. Do lines need coords?
A large area, also defunct, Greta Army Camp, if I found it do I tag the centre? is the 'centre' identifiable after selling off? the front gate? --Dave Rave (talk) 06:57, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Large items or items with components
Talk:Drotrecogin alfa

message: The article name is alfa by the top of the article says alpha. Nagelfar (talk) 16:59, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  alfa or alpha? 

message: I made corrections to the two bullet points as they had subtle inaccuracies.  Typically an intensivist is not the attending physician, and conflating the two causes confusion.  Second, there are many other areas in a hospital that are critical care other than an ICU. Some examples would be the Post Anesthesia Care Unit, a Shock Trauma unit, and a Burn Unit.  Rmosler | ●  14:15, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes to bullet points under indication 

message: Lilly’s Shocker, or the Post-Marketing Blues by Judy Stone Scientific American November 2, 2011
See Postmarketing surveillance  
99.181.147.68 (talk) 06:25, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  potential resource
Talk:Michael Rupert

message: — Assignment last updated by RAT1981 (talk) 21:25, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Honors English 250H VL1