lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Submersion (mathematics)

message: I think the introduction to this topic should be changed to the following.
In mathematics, a differentiable map f from an m-manifold M to an n-manifold N is said to be a submersion, if its differential is a surjective map at every point p of M, or equivalently, if rank Df(p) = dim N = n.
Ahsan
: Why? The intorduction, as it stands, offers far more detail and explanation that your proposed introduction. Dharma6662000 (talk) 04:00, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I deleted the submersion theorem. It seemed to have been tacked on with a later edit. Its notation didn't match the original article (e.g. using x^0 instead if p to denote a point in the source manifold). Secondly there was absolutely no attempt to say what the notation meant, or to link it. For example writing thinks like \mbox{Lin}(\mathbb{R}^n,\mathbb{R}^{n-d}) without saying that it was the space of linear maps from \mathbb{R}^n to \mathbb{R}^{n-d}. I understood what that means because I understand the idea. But there were other random notations like N(x^0) that even I didn't understand. This theorem needs to be rewriten by someone that has some sympathy for the reader. I'll try to do it tomorrow. Dharma6662000 (talk) 04:00, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Submersion Theorem 

message: The final paranthetical remark is misleading: in Morse theory N = R so a critical point (in the sense of not being a submersion) is one where df has rank less than 1, that is df = 0.  There is therefore no situation where f is neither critical nor a submersion (sorry - too many negatives!) I will remove this if no-one objects. Simplifix (talk) 14:38, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with you. 81.182.216.220 (talk) 01:03, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Simplifix, I guess you mean that f is always either a submersion in a sufficiently small neighbourhood of some point x or that x is a critical point of f. If that's what you mean then I agree.  Δεκλαν Δαφισ   (talk)  21:03, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Morse theory 

message: I've changed the definitions somewhat. It seems that there are two definitions of "critical point" in the literature. One is more common, e.g. it is the one used in Sard's theorem and in the  Critical Point article (where a book of DoCarmo is referenced). This is the one I've used (note: this is what was previously called in the article a "singular point" - which is a non-standard term as far as I can tell. It leads to the terminologically absurd result that if the dimension of M is less than the dimension of N, all the points are signular!).
It is true that some authors use critical point to describe a point where the rank of the Jacobian is non-maximal (which makes critical points more rare in the case where the dimension of M is less than the dimension of N). This is explained in a "word of warning".
I hope you find this acceptable, at least as a first approximation.. :-)
Amitushtush (talk) 07:59, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two Defs. of Critical Points
Template talk:Harvard citation

message: Given the commonality in markup for the author-date templates, I have developed a meta-template at . See Template talk:Sfn#Core update. ---— Gadget850 (Ed) talk 01:40, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Core update 

message: Please see Module_talk:Footnotes#consolidating_and_abandoning_Template:Harvard_citation/core.
—Trappist the monk (talk) 16:08, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  consolidating and abandoning [[Template:Harvard citation/core]] 

message: Please see the discussion at  where a broken harv-link reporting scheme is proposed.
—Trappist the monk (talk) 17:46, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  broken harv link reporting 

message: Currently the page reads: "...typically used within  ... tags". This should be changed to reflect the deprecation of parenthical citation from September 2020. I propose changing the "typically" to "always". Mateussf (talk) 03:37, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ref marks 

message: Can we update the documentation to provide the situations where this template is most appropriate to use now that it has been deprecated for body text? Per recent discussions at Help talk:Shortened footnotes and Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style, the parenthetical citations generated by this template are still accepted within explanatory notes. Although  is more common, this template can be placed within ref tags as a shortened footnote. Are there other situations where  is commonly used and accepted on Wikipedia? Rjjiii (talk) 05:16, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updating documentation 

message: You are invited to join the discussion at Module talk:Footnotes § loc, at.  Rjjiii (talk) 02:44, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion at [[:Module talk:Footnotes#loc, at|Module talk:Footnotes §&nbsp;loc, at]]
Talk:Bobbi Sykes

message: I have removed material from  that does not comply with our policy on the biographies of living persons. Biographical material must always be referenced from reliable sources, especially negative material. Negative material that does not comply with that must be immediately removed. Note that the removal does not imply that the information is either true or false.
Please do not reinsert this material unless you can provide reliable citations, and can ensure it is written in a neutral tone. Please review the relevant policies before editing in this regard. Editors should note that failure to follow this policy may result in the removal of editing privileges.--Scott Mac (Doc) 15:32, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  removals of unsourced material 
Talk:Chelsea Quinn Yarbro

message: There appears to be a lot of useful info at 
 
that could be drawn on to expand.  (I've reverted to lose the copyvio version that pasted its content on top of what is now again the current version.)--Jerzy•t 22:24, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: I don't see from the article how this person meets WP:GNG. Can someone explain here with WP:RS or add such WP:RS to the article. Thanks, Verbal chat 16:58, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added some of the awards and honours Yarbro has received in recognition of her work (with references). She might not be a household name like Stephen King but she's certainly a well known and respected author. ~ Brother William (talk) 02:22, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 
File talk:MarsSaga-boxart.jpg

message: I'm confused about what exactly the licensing situation is here.  This is a photograph of a video game box cover.  The copyright of the box art itself is presumably still owned by Electronic Arts or Activision or something like that, but this particular photograph of the art is (I guess?) owned by the person who took it.  When asked in an email he allowed it to be licensed under the GFDL.  How does that work with the subject of the photograph being probably still copyrighted?  I've listed it under both GFDL and fair use, but that can't be right.  Perhaps someone with more legal knowledge than me can figure out what to do in this situation. - Pwbrooks 22:25, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I think I've resolved the issue with help from Nichalp on IRC.  Thanks! Pwbrooks 09:00, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Web

message: Should the Waltzsoft advert be here?
i've never heard of it, but if you think it has merit, then add it in. please sign and date your posts, by adding four tildes (~) to the end of whatever you say
Inzy 01:18, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

message: It's not alphabetical, "Archaeology" would be.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.15.218.45 (talk) 16:19, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is "Computing" the first category? 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :W.E.B. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 7#W.E.B until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  — Mikehawk10 (talk) 05:13, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "W.E.B" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: Electromagnestism in todays technology 112.198.179.211 (talk) 11:30, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  science
Talk:Cooling, Kent

message: Hi Morwen
Try Sharnel, Sharnal, Shamel for the hundred, although it's possibly part of the Hundred of Hoo (see also Strood). I'm (slowly) re-writing/researching Cooling+Cooling Castle off WP, as part of the clean-up, so perhaps hang-fire with your improvements till I finally drop in my large lump, lest we create divergent versions? (Oh the horror...) Cheers, JackyR 19:27, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi.  I'm not likely to do anything else to it - was doing parish stuff.  Morwen - Talk 19:46, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sharnel 
Talk:List of Argentine Jews

message: FWIW:
Distinguished scholars associate themselves to AMIA
Abraham Gak, Bernardo Dujovne, Eduardo Melinsky, Elsa Zigman, Federico Schuster, Félix Schuster, Gerardo Rabinovich, Gregorio Klimovsky, Gregorio Weinberg, José Nun, Pablo Jacovkis, Regina Wigdorovitz de Wikinski, Ricardo Popovsky, Salomón Muchnik y Sara Slapak.
Ejrrjs | What? 22:37, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:F-Lock

message: There are footnotes in this article, but the footnotes lead to no where???
--Bdevine (talk) 03:02, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This article is about the F-Lock feature on Microsoft keyboards; If Logitech has a similar feature, its behaviour is presumably different. Stannered (talk) 23:18, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

message: Apokrif (talk) 10:34, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: It is very similar: .--Hippeus (talk) 10:45, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is F-Lock the same as FnLock?
Talk:Maquoketa, Iowa

message: I happened upon this page today and found it to be trashed by folks who would like to take their anonymous opinions of specific Maquoketans to a user-maintained reference site- for shame. I removed the offending content (check history if you have any questions) and will continue to do so. Note that I am not involved with any of those listed; I am a 3rd party interested in updating and maintaining the page of my adopted hometown in a manner that suits Wikipedia. Dwags 02:12, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editorial Content & Town Politics 

message: I do not create sections very well so i think someone should make one about Clinton Engines in Maquoketa and how it affected maquoketa after it left and also a section about the arts in addition, a section about the fire of january 19th 2008. Anyone who even makes an attempt to do this will be given my sincerest thanks.--Treymeister (talk) 02:34, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sections that should be created 

message: Dr. Richard B. Wells, author, inventor, and professor of electrical engineering & neuroscience at the University of Idaho, was born in Maquoketa.  http://www.mrc.uidaho.edu/~rwells/  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.33.87.96 (talk) 21:06, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other Notable Maquoketans 
Talk:Lemon pie

message: I really cant believe that someone would sit down and write this trivia that contains nothing but obvious statements. Unless of course someone is trying it on!!--Light current 22:48, 7 November 2005 (UTC)

message: I remade the page and added a source so it is not a clone anymore. --LittleAwesomeApple (talk) 20:59, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  I remade the page
Talk:German names for Central European towns

message: Res ipsa loquitur
What is the relevance of this article? Settlements within Germany had ipso facto official German names, and when the border was moved westwards along with most of the German speaking people, those places were "perdu" and officially referred to as Polish settlements with Polish names. The same is true with Strasbourg in France or Bolzano in Italy. Nonetheless Germans still call them Straßburg or Bozen without any revisionist connotation, because those are their names in German. This article seems rather superfluous to me.
:I rather agree.  If this is going to be an article, what it should be is a list. john k (talk) 21:29, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  I agree too. So I started the list.. Brickie (talk) 12:10, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The part about usage. Official and private (both German and even Polish publications) in German language versions use exclusively Breslau, Danzig or Stettin, even brochures produced by the city governments, not to mention popular guidebook series'. So the names are used way more often then the article states, not citing where the info is supposed to come from.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.255.36.92 (talk) 00:51, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Don't think this is true

message: Propose a merge with this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_exonyms Brickie (talk) 13:22, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Actually

message: Since when have Belgium, Denmark, and France been "Central European countries"? -- Picapica (talk) 23:19, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Scope
Talk:Voiced labiodental flap

message: i think that that symbol was used before Greenberg, but i would have to look this up. – ishwar  (speak) 22:55, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Greenberg

message: Please don't jump on me for asking: is this labiodental flap also used in some pronunciations of the English curse word 'fuck'? RedTomato (talk) 22:35, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Doubtful; a strong labiodental fricative is probably what you've heard. --JorisvS (talk) 23:09, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Many thanks RedTomato (talk) 09:35, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I could see a pronunciation with a strong voiceless flap. I might even have done it. But I don't know how close this would be (apart from voicing) to the phonemic flap in the languages where it occurs. — kwami (talk) 12:33, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: What do mean when you say you don't know close this would be to the phonemic flap, could you elaborate? --JorisvS (talk) 14:02, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  English f-word swearing?  

message: The image provided here is a <ṹ>, not <ⱱ>. Can this be fixed somehow? Omoutuazn (talk) 14:02, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image
Talk:Phonophobia

message: It's hard to provide reference or sources because not much is known about the phobia, because a lot of people who have it don't even realize there's a name for the condition. The article is based off of personal experiences of myself and others that I've read about. 
The only google results for "ligryophobia" are those "phobia lists" and a few entries on various message boards. Nothing good and concrete to cite as a source, unfortunately. --Aleron235 23:01, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree there is a scarcity of information out there.  I deal with this condition myself, though perhaps not to the level the article describes.  I don't worry about my TV volume, or the smoke alarm, etc.  I do have a fear of really loud noises like severe thunder/close lightning strikes, and gunshots (which sucks, because I actually like guns).  The section concerning balloons is dead-on.  Watching someone overinflate a balloon, especially a large one, is really disconcerting.  I normally find an excuse to discreetly exit the room.  :)  I am still looking for more information on this condition, and hopefully will be able to find a way to overcome it.Crazed actor 17:03, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Something else that should be noticed that medical phonophobia a) isn't a fear of sound, but a hypersensitivity to it, and b) is a common symptom of migraine (I came here from the migraine page).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.202.185.125 (talk) 00:35, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Talk
Talk:Michael G. Coney

message: There was a notice  in the Victoria Times Colonist: "CONEY, Michael Greatrex 28 September 1932 - 4 November 2005 Passed away peacefully at the Saanich Peninsula Hospital Palliative care unit of Cancer (Mesothelioma)....". I expect that this link may be transient so I didn't add it to the article. --Big_Iron 23:07, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Economy of Suriname

message: Better to delete & incorporate in Suriname article —The preceding unsigned comment was added by User talk:Ghosts&empties (talk • contribs) .
I miss in both the main article as the economy article the money sent to relatives by the Suriname diaspora. 88.159.66.26 (talk) 20:32, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Callanish

message: "It is the second largest stone circle on the British Isles, after Stonehenge." Hmmm. Even Stonehenge isn't the largest stone circle IN the British Isles... never heard of Avebury? SiGarb 23:10, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Are there entries for any of the associated stone circles?  I can't find them, if they exist.  If they do indeed exist, I have photographs of them all which I could add.  Copyright is not an issue, as I took them myself. (I photograph sites of archeaological interest all over the Highlands & Islands). SiGarb's comment is also perfectly valid - Calanis isn't the second biggest circle in the UK.  In addition to Avebury, there's Brodgar too.  Calanis is, for my money, the most atmospheric and impressive stone circle in the UK, though. Lianachan 19:20, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you mean Callanish I, II, II etc? No, I don't think there are any such articles as yet. You could start them yourself, of course (or, if you don't have a lot of extra information about each one, you could always just add the photos to this article). I have pics of some of them, but they were taken rather long ago (mid 1970s), and the slides have suffered somewhat over the years. I'd love to see your ones, of Calanais (I agree with your estimation of the site as the most atmospheric in the UK) and any other sites.  So, if you don't mind sharing them with the world at large, go for it! SiGarb 22:28, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Holiness-Pentecostal

message: Why does this article exist?  Shouldn't it be merged with Holiness movement, Pentecostalism, or Charismatic?  KHM03 23:18, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point, but don't ask me, when I got here it was already there. I am Holiness-Pentecostal, and to me it is a distinct religion, but judge it as you will. Merging the articles wouldn't be that bad, as long as you give some indication of the differences between one or the other. But please, don't merge it with Charismatic, there is a distinct difference between the two.Эйрон Кинни 01:01, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

text: I believe this article should be merged into Pentecostalism and this page deleted, but please put a reference in the header of the Pentecostalism article back to the Holiness movement article.Mokwella 05:03, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: ?
Talk:Pouteria lucuma

message: I removed a large chunk of info that was a copyvio from  - AKeen 23:19, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: should the article name be corrected? The correct spanish spelling is with the accent; should it be kept? --Orpheo 07:57, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: You are correct - I moved the article - AKeen 05:29, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It's actually neither. The accepted English name for Pouteria lucuma is Lucmo. The page needs to be moved in order to reflect the correct nomenclature. Please refer to Purdue University's New Crop Resource Online Program; there is an article on the Lucmo by Julia F. Morton (Morton, J. 1987. "Lucmo." p. 405–406. Fruits of warm climates. Julia F. Morton, Miami, FL, ISBN: 0-9610184-1-0). --Rcgy 08:12, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

text: Is the lucuma really known as a 'lucmo'? I have never heard of this name. A Google search turns up 50 times more hits for Lucuma. It is Wikipedia policy to use the original name if it is more commonly used by English speakers, which 'lucuma' certainly appears to be. Wikipedia:Naming_conventions_%28use_English%29. - AKeen 15:33, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lucuma or Lúcuma? 

message: . Apologies for missing your editing banner message. My changes were not on content, but on organization. Will watch for you edits. --Zefr (talk) 16:27, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits 9-14-17
Talk:Robert J. White

message: Anyone think it should be mentioned that Bob White was also a medical ethics advisor for Pope John II?  I can not find a primary source to support this, but I know there is a lot of secondary info out there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.138.73.76 (talk • contribs) 00:36, 8 November 2005
I'm nominating this article for a POV check - there's some egregious editorializing on the ethics of head/body transplantation, not to mention the hints that reasonable people should be repulsed by the idea. topynate (talk) 17:47, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: i say it needs no pov check, transplants were  useless and cruel  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.38.155.134 (talk) 01:47, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  untitled 

message: If this actually occurred, I presume there were publications that can document it. 72.228.177.92 (talk) 04:37, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I suppose it isn't, goes back too far. As far the process is concerned, this would really work best with a clone engineered to not have a brain or maybe just the lower brain structures. 72.228.177.92 (talk) 04:43, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  is this a hoax? 

message: :The transplant would offer options to those individuals, who would rather be quadriplegic than dead.
Shouldn't that be "rather be dead than quadriplegic"? --TotempaaltJ (talk) 15:59, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rather what? 

message: He may have has his name on 900 publications, but he sure as hell can't have written all of them. What a goddamn piece of work!!!88.110.123.140 (talk) 23:04, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  900 publications 

message: my favourite fish is trout  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.17.153.46 (talk) 00:05, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  raymond (fishing) white 
Talk:IBM Research

message: Per the discussion on article's talk and AfD (see my edit summary here). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:48, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Binnig and Rohrer Nanotechnology Center]] redirects here
Talk:Annual general meeting

message: An annual meeting of a corporation is not "commonly" referred to as an Annual General Meeting or abbreviated as "AGM" in the United States.  This article should be more specific as to where this terminology is in common use.  --Russ Blau (talk) 23:39, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terminology 

message: The introduction has : "An AGM is held every year to elect the Board of Directors".  But an AGM is not necessarily held every year, and organisations holding AGMs do not necessarily hane a "Board of Directors".
Any part of the Introduction which is not known to be applicable world-wide should be moved into another Section, qualified, or corrected. 82.163.24.100 (talk) 12:54, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction 

message: I think that the pictufe added yesterday is blurry mobile picture and has a strange light that makes it of poor quality. It is a famous person sitting there, but else it is a table on a scen. You do not see why it should look like a general meeting, it could be a play at a theatre. Because of the poor quality and that it does not add something to tje article I think it should be removed, and I ask another neutral person to look at it too to get a second opinion. Adville (talk) 11:11, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  New picture from ulricdals castle. Poor quality