Talk:Organizational structure

message: Link to Organizational development? Yaron 08:49, Apr 20, 2004 (UTC)
need diagrams of the structures (comment by 212.219.143.250 moved from article by --Alf 15:07, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

message: unless there is something i'm missing... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.81.85.134 (talk) 18:40, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  maybe remove the "lacks references" tag now? 

message: How can an organisation's main objectives determine it's structure?
wr  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.204.3.163 (talk) 17:10, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Business structure 

message: how to make  an organization  efficient and effective?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.153.99.89 (talk) 16:20, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  marketing 

message: This section needs to be completely rewritten. Those are not factors leading to success, those are types of organisational structure.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.63.43.5 (talk) 09:23, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Success factors 

message: It sounds as if these were opposite, which is not true. Hierarchical structure can be tall or flat (height of the pyramid for example), it still stays a hierarchical structure. So being flat is an optional property of a hierarchical structure (althrough hierarchical structures tend to be tall rather than flat).
Also organisation can not be "flat". It can only have flat organisational structure.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.21.170.9 (talk) 17:09, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  History: Hierarchical organization and Flat organization 

message: The article says "Matrix structure is amongst the purest of organizational structures, a simple lattice emulating order and regularity demonstrated in nature." Can somebody elaborate what this means, and where this kind of order and regularity is actually demonstrated in nature, preferably with one or more citations? Otherwise I suggest removing the entire sentence, IMHO it does not add to the description of matrix organization. 95.90.236.202 (talk) 12:45, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed. --Izno (talk) 13:40, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Matrix Organization 

message: I feel that the section "Hierarchy-community phenotype model" should be removed.
I found the concept really interesting and wanted to find out more but there is no reference to the original paper. If the structure is not mainstream enough to allow further information, then it should not really be on a wikipedia page in such detail. A better approach would be to have an "alternative structures" section and briefly list concepts and references. The paper "Examining the literature on organizational structure and success" is not a comprehensive literature review paper (it does not have a bibliography and only references a very few papers)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Internetscooter (talk • contribs) 02:15, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hierarchy-community phenotype model should be removed 

message: The article doesn't make clear if Bureaucratic and Functional are different structures.  
The discussion of Functional Structure begins with a discussion of org structure in general, which should be earlier the article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.20.10.177 (talk) 16:20, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bureaucratic vs functional structure? 

message: — Assignment last updated by Jessssy (talk) 23:35, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - FA22 - Sect 200 - Thu

message: Is there a special organizational structure for architecture schools?
It seems that a special organizational structure should be designed for them according to their social roles and the special educational methods that exist in them. 5.124.62.2 (talk) 18:12, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Organizational structure