lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Journal of Consciousness Studies

message: This article does not mention the editor of this journal - at one time, this was Robert K.C. Forman. Since I created an article on Robert K.C. Forman recently, perhaps his name should we mentioned here, and we could add a wikilink. Also, perhaps the article on Forman should refer to this journal. ACEOREVIVED (talk) 18:43, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: A note

message: I've renamed the section Conferences to Reporting on Conferences and have moved it near to the bottom of the page (It was far too high previously - coming above Articles).
I have also re-written the material. The original gave the misleading impression that the JCS was involved with organizing these conferences, rather than independently reporting them. A reference has been added. (Peter Ells (talk) 01:30, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conferences 

message: As you will notice, there is a dead link to the Toward a Science of Consciousness conferences in the main article. I tried to create a page for it, but it was rejected by the admins. I am trying to improve the page in order to resubmit it. If you are interested in helping with this, please go to:
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Toward a Science of Consciousness
There is more information (including the reasons for rejection) this page. Thanks, (Peter Ells (talk) 01:40, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Toward a Science of Consciousness 

message: At the moment, his section of the wiki JCS page seems to be a fairly random selection of names: Where for example is David Chalmers? My suggestion for a more objective list is to name those who have published 'Target Articles' in JCS, where the Editor has invited responses from other academics. Also those who have had special issues of JCS devoted entirely to their work. Each name would be footnoted with a sentence about their work, and a link to the JCS issue.
(Peter Ells (talk) 01:56, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  FOR DISCUSSION: Notable Contributors 

message: Google Books shows that there was a "Journal for the Study of Consciousness" some decades before this. Are they related? 2A00:23C5:FE56:6C01:FCC4:5C75:2A74:4837 (talk) 15:59, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Same as "The Journal for the Study of Consciousness"?
Talk:Lovington, Somerset

message: An Irish translation was added to this article & infobox by User:140.203.12.240 on 12 April 2008 & tidied by User:Rjwilmsi today - does anyone know why this is here or can I remove it?— Rod talk 14:45, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: As there was no comment or explanation for this I have removed it.— Rod talk 18:04, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Irish translation
Talk:Lopen

message: A recent edit to the information about the mosaic suggests the reconstruction included a Cantharus which is a sea snail which I was going to wikilink. The source says "We decided on the ewer (cantharus)" so would Pitcher (container) be a better wikilink?— Rod talk 08:00, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cantharus 
Talk:Ticklish Reuben

message: "...descends into an abyss of maniacal, sinister laughing."
I descended into an abyss of maniacal, sinister laughing when I read this.
Btater7 (talk) 23:22, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

message: *
*
*  78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 19:55, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  No time now... but to add later
Talk:Hararit

message: This article has been nominated for deletion on the grounds of WP:NOTABILITY. Please join the discussion here: -- — Keithbob • Talk •  18:21, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: AfD

message: Is this a reliable source? Hararit and Lavra Netofa --BwB (talk) 01:48, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reliable Source? 

message: Is this article so closely related to Transcendental Meditation that it needs to have the TM Project banner at the top of its talk page? And do we need the TM menu template at the bottom of this article? and a special category called: Transcendental Meditation communities when there are only two of them (one being this article)?  It seems like overkill to me. Any thoughts from others? -- — Keithbob • Talk •  18:57, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Transcendental Mediation project
Talk:List of Bishops of Bath and Wells and precursor offices

message: I would guess that the word Translated has some special significance other that 'moved', 'promoted' or 'demoted', but I have no idea what it might be, and suspect that many other readers will feel the same way. Can it be explained please, or a link made to an appropriate article? --Derek Andrews (talk) 13:24, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translated? 

message: Thomas Beckington as Warden of New College? Not obvious from List of Wardens of New College, Oxford. Charles Matthews (talk) 21:54, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to whack it. It predates my additions. Ealdgyth - Talk 21:56, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Query
Talk:The National Law Journal

message: User:Senator2029 proposed on 12 March 2012 to merge the article Legal Times into the article The National Law Journal.  Not giving any reason why for eight days seems like a good reason to reject the proposal.  Also, they appear to be two separate publications, so I see no reason to agree with the proposal.  Does anyone else care?  Even the person who proposed it?  -- Pemilligan (talk) 04:11, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to merge Legal Times into The National Law Journal
Talk:Azure (magazine)

message: This is a relatively small article and it is intimately tied to the Shalem Center.  Right now there is significant overlap between the two articles.  One long cited article is better than a lot of small uncited articles.  I can't imagine this separate article growing to a significant size.  I suspect this article isn't that highly trafficked (which is part of the problem and why I think it should be merged), thus I might not even get a response here.  --John Bahrain (talk) 12:25, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see the need.--Benjamin canaan (talk) 08:41, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge into [[Shalem Center]]?
Talk:The Quarterly Journal of Economics

message: This journal is controversial within the economics profession, for reasons not stated in the article. There are two related issues. One is that while it is supposedly peer-reviewed, in practice most articles are written by the faculty, students, and friends of the Harvard economics department. The editors actually tell people to send them their papers, a big no-no for a refereed journal. The other issue is that it has come to display a strong preference for work that is "cute" but rarely very substantial. This it is viewed as contributing to the "Freakonomics" direction in academic economics.
The article should discuss these issues.
80.13.107.121 (talk) 20:59, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  This journal is controversial
Talk:List of medical journals

message: I question the usefulness of categorizing by first letter. People who already know what they're looking for are probably going to be searching for this. When people come to a list, they probably want to look by topic. What are the cancer journals? The surgery journals? And, of course, the general journals? Ect., ect. What do others think? II | (t - c) 23:07, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  categorizing by topic rather than letter 

message: There is an RfC regarding the standardization of journal lists names. Please comment at Talk:List of journals#RFC. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 01:38, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Talk:Lists of journals#RFC|RfC on journal list names]]

message: As the list currently stands, there is effectively no benefit versus the :Category:Medical journals in regard to the alphabetical list and versus sub-categories of the Med. Journal category for the speciality listings.  Also, there is not a specified inclusion criteria for the list; this matter of inclusion criteria appears in general to be of more importance for list-type articles than for categorization based on observation of editing behavior of the two.  The reason for the apparent redundancy between this list and categories is that all list items are also represented by articles and the scope of the list matches that of the noted categories.  I'm thinking about how to address these concerns of mine, but I thought I'd put this out there for comment before I did anything drastic.  Regards --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 12:31, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: *Including links to journal homepages as "references" (sourcing what, that the journal exists?) do not really make this list any better. Are we going to include a hyperlink to each journal's homepage now to give this list a semblance of being sourced? --Randykitty (talk) 15:07, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Utility and validity of this list 

message: The Index Medicus, Pubmed and Medline comprise more than 5,000 journals. As many journals have content relating to several medical specialties, organising these will be a substantial and probably impossible task. A list with just the most important journals would ideally consider the Citation Index, which is an objective parameter and could be used as a cutoff value. As the Citation Index of journals can and will change, the list would have to be adapted all the time. Other Internet sources would probably be more useful in this regard instead of this article. The current list has been composed arbitrarily and is of little use in my opinion.Opzwartbeek (talk) 22:58, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  List ist absolutely incomplete and maybe useless 

message: Is this one a valid journal, worthy of inclusion in the list?  Arcturus (talk) 17:29, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  EJMED
Talk:USS Truxtun (DD-14)

message: I have a newspaper account of the Truxtun's visit to Jacksonville, Florida and the recollections of one of its sailors on the Ship.
He, Frank Bourie, Sr., (the father of my late wife) says that there was a speed contast between the Truxtun and "the west Coast based" Farragut. The Farragut was said to hold the speed record at the time and the Truxtun out ran her.  It further states that the Truxtun was rigged with towing halters (since it only could hold 10 days of coal) and became the charge of the Battleship California for the next leg of the around-the-world cruise across the Pacific.
It also has more detail on the trip to Samoa stating that the Truxtun encountered a 65 day Typhoon.
Looking for supporting evidence.
Buddy  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Specialmissions (talk • contribs) 18:53, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Truxtun escort of California on Pacific leg of Great White Fleet
Talk:Landfall (journal)

message: I've removed the "Writers published in Landfall include" section because it seems unworkable if the journal has been going since the 1940s. We will end up with a very long list. Most entries for journals don't have one. Ditto the artists. NZ forever (talk) 05:15, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contributers list would be too long 
Talk:Journal of the ACM

message: This article is 4 years old and is still in this sad shape.  Is this notable enough to be an article?  Or should it be deleted?
I hate to see anyone's effort go to waste but there may not have been much effort put into this.  
User F203 (talk) 17:44, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It is the best general-purpose journal in computer science. It certainly is notable enough to be an article. More effort would not go amiss. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:57, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This is why discussion is good.  I talked with someone and have now changed my mind.  This is not some obscure, worthless journal.  It is over 50 years old and has overseen the period where computer science has transformed society.  This article just needs a little work, that's all. User F203 (talk) 17:08, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  importance? 

message: I'm doubted.
Look at the following
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&lr=&newwindow=1&q=allintitle%3A+validation&as_publication=Journal+of+the+ACM&btnG=Search
and
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&lr=&newwindow=1&q=allintitle%3A+validation&as_publication=IEEE+Transactions+on+Computers&btnG=Search
--222.67.216.110 (talk) 02:10, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leading professional ...??? 

message: http://research.yahoo.com/Prabhakar_Raghavan
http://jacm.acm.org/Editors.html
I cann't see the relation of the above pages between the two
--222.64.17.99 (talk) 00:26, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The same person....??? 
Talk:List of economics journals

message: There is an RfC regarding the standardization of journal lists names. Please comment at Talk:List of journals#RFC. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 01:38, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Talk:Lists of journals#RFC|RfC on journal list names]]

message: This edit  removed all the BE Press journals. I suppose that's appropriate, because some BE Press journals are not about economics. But it's a pity, because several BE Press journals are now very influential in economics. I will start adding back the economics-oriented journals, one by one. Rinconsoleao (talk) 13:10, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: BE Press

message: The Engineering Economist is a refereed publication with impact factors and ranking. There are other journals on this list that are applied in nature, energy economics or business economics, etc. I propose adding the journal to this list. Cheers Risk Engineer (talk) 16:05, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Engineering Economist journal suggestion
Talk:Twilight World

message: Erm...
Someone needs to change the band name on themain page.
It should be "Twilight World", not "Twillight World" - an extra "l" seems to have crept in there.
82.16.19.50 (talk) 17:10, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow, sad that it took more than two years for anyone to fix it. I took care of it. Horologium (talk) 03:06, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  - Wrong spelling for song name -
Talk:Two of Hearts (song)

message: The song's writing credits are listed at BMI Songview Search as just one person: John Dixon Mitchell. 
Sue Gatlin and Tim Greene were listed on the label as writers, but they were not listed with BMI. Binksternet (talk) 20:10, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not Sue Gatlin or Tim Greene
Talk:USS David R. Ray

message: http://www.navytimes.com/news/2008/06/ap_destroyer_062708/
Summer 2008. RimPac exercise off Hawaii or somewhere in the eastern Pacific. Ray to be used as a target vessel during the exercise. Ex crew members usually enjoying knowing what happened to ships they served on. Hopefully someone will notice when the actual sinking occurs and where then provide the info here. Enquiring squids like to know. Carry on. 72.47.13.75 (talk) 23:08, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Do we have a ref that ex-DD-971 was the ship sunk by the ADCAP? ex-Cushing was also set to be sunk during RIMPAC 2008. This blog says David R. Ray was sunk on the 11th, not the 24th. --Dual Freq (talk) 02:34, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like an official USS Lake Erie blog and includes sinkex pictures from the 11th and talks about sinking David R. Ray. It seems to be official enough and has been linked from Lake Eries official USN website. Its enough to convince me that this was not the ship sunk on the 23rd. --Dual Freq (talk) 02:56, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Fletcher was scheduled to sinkex also, so the sub target could have been ex-Cushing or ex-Fletcher. --Dual Freq (talk) 03:20, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  USS Fletcher's website reports that it was her that was sunk in that CBASS firing.  The USS Lake Erie blog seems to confirm that David R Ray was sunk by missiles and gunfire.  David Biddulph (talk) 10:24, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

text: Ex-DD-971 was sunk on 11 July by an MK 48 Mod 7 CBASS fired by HMAS Waller. High res pictures are available. 203.7.140.3 (talk) 04:10, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Link the photo that shows DD-971 or says David R Ray. There were 3 Spruance Destroyers set to be sunk during RIMPAC and we have an official blog stating the David R Ray was sunk earlier in the month. The link you provided doesn't provide a date and doesn't say which Spruance was sunk, though it looks like it may have been ex-Fletcher on the 16th. --Dual Freq (talk) 11:27, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sinkex
Talk:USS Fletcher (DD-992)

message: Good day,
The sea swap for the USS Fletcher was four different crews, not three.  I do not remember which three other DD crews made the change but there was definitely three crew changes.  I was the civilian Port Engineer for this evolution.  It was on the basis of my first crew change availability report that the Navy decided to add an extra "swap".  I remain close to the first Fletcher CO and believe that he can improve this article.  You can reach me at PatatSea@aol.com.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:302:D170:57B0:98A6:7CFD:3FA4:5EB3 (talk) 12:26, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  incorrect entry for the USS Fletcher, DD 992 
Talk:Journal of Near-Death Studies

message: I have added several secondary sources in order to improve notability. I argue in favour of removing the tag.--Hawol (talk) 16:53, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability tag 
Talk:Consumer advocacy

message: I have changed the target of the redirection to Consumer organization from Consumer protection. Advocacy tends to be a non-governmental actity that occurs within a legal and regulatory framework, but may be directed against governmental regulation, although not usually against consumer protection regulation. I don't think that my views are unreasonably limited to the situation in the U.S., but they may be. I'll be listening and watching for other opinions and information. DCDuring 16:37, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Target of Redirection
Talk:USS John Hancock (DD-981)

message: I believe that the Mk 41 VLS can also be used to launch ASROC missiles, and so that system is not restricted to Tomahawk missiles.
Furthermore, the "Spruance" class destroyers specialized in antisubmarine warfare, so it made no sense to send them to sea w/o any ASROCs. As built, these destroyers all had one 8-cell ASROC launcher, BUT with three complete automated reloads (from a deckhouse), for an amazing total of 24 ASROC missiles. Their other ASW armament included two "Seahawk" helicopters, capable of carrying multiple Mk 46 ASW torpedoes, plus sonobuoys to drop, plus MAD detectors, plus the ship's six reloadable torpedo tubes for Mk 46 torpedoes. All of this was combined with the best bow sonar in the world for surface ships, and the world's best towed sonar arrays.47.215.180.7 (talk) 09:46, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Mark 41 Vertical Launch System
Talk:Hunstrete

message: The following coordinate fixes are needed for Hunstrete Mansion dig:
Latitude 51°21'23.94"N
Longitude  2°30'33.50"W
—
:Those are very specific and may apply to the dig, but the article is about the whole village for which I think those given are accurate and specific enough.— Rod talk 17:35, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: per what Rodw said. If, however, those specific coordinates can be sourced (I'm seeing no clear indication on old OS maps), they can be added to the paragraph about the dig. Deor (talk) 20:32, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error 
Talk:Horsington, Somerset

message: A neutral and encyclopedic tone is not established by phrases such as:
:"narrow-minded and pedantic mindset"
:"Unfortunately, the necessary repairs" (see WP:EDITORIAL)
:"will prove utterly disastrous to village life"
::Chris the speller yack 20:14, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 
Talk:Gray's Sporting Journal

message: In the description of the magazine - "It employs perfect binding..." - sounds biased. While presenting facts, the entire section almost reads like an advertisement.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Clannagael (talk • contribs) 19:54, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: "Perfect binding" has a technical meaning, but I've just copyedited to make it sound more neutral and less like an advert and therefore removed the tag. Qwfp (talk) 12:02, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality Disputed
Talk:Hinton St George

message: ... or just a posh farmhouse?  If they are of interest I'll sort out the distortion and upload a higher resolution version.
Number774 (talk) 16:21, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It appears to be Priory Farmhouse. A Grade II* listed building dating from the 14 to 15th century. Images of England says "The house thought to have been an open hall house originally: in the late C17 it was known as the Home Tenement, its present name dating from the late C19: it is possible that the house predated Hinton House as the Manor House: it may have been in the possession of Monkton Farleigh Priory." see full record at Priory Farmhouse (although the photo is from a different angle I'm 99.9% sure it is the same building). Could be worth its own article - with a bit more digging & would definitely be worth including in this article.— Rod talk 16:33, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks Rod, that's the place.  I notice the photo in the linked article is from a side road; I took it from straight opposite, and stitched several images which is why the barrel distortion. Number774 (talk) 13:57, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are these almshouses? 
Talk:Pacific Journal of Mathematics

message: The link to Bob Finn is wrong (it goes to some disambiguation page which has
two entries, one for an ambassador to Afghanistan and one for a bishop,
and the guy who does calculus of variations and capillary surfaces and
all of that is neither).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.241.239.70 (talk) 00:29, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Hinton Charterhouse

message: "The Church of St John the Baptist dates from the same period and is Grade II* listed.[11]"
This is a sentence sitting by itself under Religious sites. What period is the same period?
--Oldontarian (talk) 06:51, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Well spotted. I clicked on the reference given which says 12th century so I have changed the article.— Rod talk 08:08, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Information omitted 
Talk:Hinton Blewett

message: I note that the name of the village has been changed from Hinton Blewitt to Hinton Blewett although the article title still has the Blewitt spelling. Does anyone have strong evidence either way about which spelling is more commonly used?— Rod talk 17:11, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Correct name, according to MAGIC and OS GB is Blewett not Blewitt. Also spelled as Blewett all over BANES website. As a consequence I have moved the article. --Simple Bob (talk) 17:28, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Village name spelling 
Talk:Hinkley Point B nuclear power station

message: Reference to 420 MWh makes no sense, I believe it should read 420 MW. (Bakazan 11:31, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Berkeley Nuclear Power Station which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. Rosbif73 (talk) 15:26, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 21 October 2020