lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Gulfstream Aerospace

message: Didn't Gulfstream plan a supersonic bizjet? With Sukhoi, IIRC.  Trekphiler (talk) 23:38, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Machstream?

message: "the Gulfstream image was seriously tarnished in 2009 when automakers chose to use private jets to reach Washington DC for discussions about government loans - prompting a public relations response called "No Plane - No Gain" by the National Business Aviation Association.[2]"
I think this is overstated. Is there any evidence that it tarnish Gulfstream in particular and furthermore that the supposed "tarnish" was anything more than a short term fad of criticising private business jets. The downturn in business was obviously affected by the general downturn in the economy. 82.46.49.45 (talk) 16:59, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I absolutely agree. I never heard Gulfsteam mentioned during the press frenzy and if it was ever mentioned no common sense American would have related the CEO's of car companies to an aircraft. I'm deleting it because it's just slander, probably a joke from Airbus lads. Fadedroots (talk) 06:07, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm sorry I missed that addition to the article, and the note here. I concur with its removal. - BilCat (talk) 08:11, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Tarnish" 

message: Hi, 
I have been looking through Wikipedia's Gulfstream aircraft and have seen that there is no G700 page -- Where is it?! It's been showcased since October 2019!!!!!!!! --HK2267 (talk) 16:06, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a link at the top of the current products list in this article, in the Template:Gulfstream aircraft navbox, on the G700 disambiguation page, and at Gulfstream G700, which all point to Gulfstream G650#G700, where the G700 is covered in detail. How did you miss all that? - BilCat (talk) 20:02, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  No G700 article? 

message: The article completely ignores their Gulfstream-American light aircraft division and light aircraft model history. Maybe insert a placeholder section for that topic. 73.35.181.254 (talk) 03:59, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gulfstream American
Talk:Cdrdao

message: I'm removing this line:
: cdrdao does not support external drives that are connected via USB or FireWire.
because it works for me - FireWire, under Linux.  - Pronoiac 07:27, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  External drives 

message: The dylantree site is no longer working, so this guide, which is excellent, is unavailable. If anyone sees this and is able to get a copy of that page, please mirrror it or something so it can be accessed again. Thanks--72.75.113.204 16:52, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken Link To Dylantree 

message: How is this software deserving of an article? ~MDD4696 02:49, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The proposed guideline for software notability suggests that cdrdao might be notable if "The software is included in a major operating system distribution such as Debian, Fedora Core or FreeBSD, and the maintainer of the distribution is independent from the software developer."  Not sure about Debian, FC, or FreeBSD, but cdrdao is included in Ubuntu (easily among the top 10 Linux distributions), so I'd say the software is in the notable ballpark.  --Ds13 03:46, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable? 

message: A test today did not confirm cdrdao in recent revisions to compile on Mac OS X 10.6, Solaris, IRIX and HP UX. Reason is a modified and outdated libscg, which hinders cross-platform-compiling. I would suggest to remove "cross-platform" and to replace it with: linux-and-windows-availability. --195.37.78.113 (talk) 12:40, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not cross-platform available 

message: Note that due to the fact that the cdrdao authors destroyed the previously working auto-configuration for libscg, there is no way to compile the latest cdrdao on any platform that needs libscg because cdrdao did not add a so called "native implementation" for the related platform.
Feel free to present reliable sources that verify a successful compile for one of the removed platforms if you like to to add a related platform again. Schily (talk) 14:00, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Libscg no longer compiles with version 1.2.3 
Talk:Bhilai Institute of Technology

message: Dear all,
This page is created to include knowledge about BIT-Durg from an encyclopedic point of view.Please do not include any comment which makes it look like a flyer, popularizing the institute from a commertial point of view.
Its a request to carefully frame your sentences before actually putting it in the article.Alternatively, you can send your 'train of thoughts' to amiyashrivastava@yahoo.com. We shall frame it properly and include it in this article.
Looking forward to your cooperation.
Amiyashrivastava 06:53, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: A Request

message: I just added a "lead too long" tag, but I think I should say more accurately, that my concern wasn't necessarily with its length, but rather its content.  It seems like some of that information (e.g information about the governance) might be better in the body section. Is that agreeable? Rodaen (talk) 08:24, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead too long 
Talk:Course: Oblivion

message: There was a temporary problem with reaching the page Course: Oblivion (Star Trek: Voyager) because "Course" became a new Wikipedia namespace. At the time of writing this has been switched off, and the page has been restored at Course:Oblivion (Star Trek: Voyager) and moved back to Course: Oblivion (Star Trek: Voyager) (with a space after the colon). – Fayenatic London 12:19, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It had ended up at Course talk:Oblivion (Star Trek: Voyager), and then Reedy moved it to Talk:Course:Oblivion (Star Trek: Voyager). Anomie⚔ 16:52, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, good to know. Glad to hear this got recovered. Rob SchnautZ (WMF) (talk • contribs)  19:17, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. I'm merging them now. – Fayenatic London 12:19, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem with Course: prefix
Talk:Historical background of the New Testament/Archive 13

message: There is a lengthy paragraph on "rule by proxy" in the section on Roman rule.  I do not know who wrote this, all I know is that FT2 recently relocated it.  My issue is not with the location of the paragraph but rather the inclusion of the paragraph.  For what it is worth, I happen to agree with everything in the paragraph.  However, unless it is sourced it reads like original research, or editorializing, to me.  Do most scholars share this view of Roman rule by proxy?  If so, can we cite a few?  Or are there scholars who are divided on how they understand rule by proxy?  Whoever added the paragraph, I urge them to find out and add sources, Slrubenstein   |  Talk 23:09, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rule by proxy
Talk:Freebooter

message: What about the "land-pirate" type of freebooter that was especially popular in the Middle Ages? They're mentioned in other articles but never defined in any actual article. RobertM525 07:38, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Alex Lowe

message: It was requested that this article be moved from Stuart Alexander Lowe to Alex Lowe.
===Survey===
Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
*Support. Jarfingle 07:41, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
*Support. Jarfingle 07:41, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: He stole my bungee cords once.  Apparently the bungees that I used to hold my gear to the back of my bike came off in the parking lot at Black Tail butte.  When I went to leave they were missing.  Some of my friends that were there said that Alex saw them on the ground and took them.  They say you shouldn't speak ill of the dead but he's a bungee thief. I am joking of course, but that is a true story.  I hope the Wiki nazis don't delete it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.57.109.180 (talk) 04:33, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Thief

message: "On a climb up El Capitan in Yosemite, one of Lowe's climbing shoes was holed in the toe box. Instead of quitting, he completed the climb, friends later recalled, by wearing his shoe backward."
What the hell does this mean? What is a toe box? How can you wear a shoe backwards? 130.63.0.18 (talk) 12:21, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indecipherable section
File talk:AVL eagleII 2.jpg

message: 1.  Picture(s) of File 10 or File 40.
2.  More information about 1600 series, how they were incompatible with and/or better than an IBM PC, different models, etc.
3.  Pictures of 1600 series.
4.  More information about Eagle PCs, including portables.
5.  Pictures of Eagle PCs, Spirits, and Turbos.
Taawi Suomainen 09:06, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Things still needed for this article
Talk:Living Witness

message: Ironically enough it's actually one of the few times Chakotay's name was pronounced CORRECTLY by the crew, considering it's the same pronunciation his own father uses in the early season flashback scenes from his childhood. 75.64.196.237 (talk) 23:26, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: "First Officer Chakotay's name is repeatedly mispronounced by the crew"?

message: I don't recall one in TNG, unless you count Yesterday's Enterprise, but even then the character's ethics haven't changed, only a slightly darker theme since the Federation has fallen on hard times.
: I'm not sure what you're asking, but "Yesterday's Enterprise" was considered the dark episode for TNG.  DS9, TOS, and Enterprise had the Mirror Universe episodes as dark episodes. Yes, every Star Trek series had at least one dark episode. Mr. College (talk) 01:52, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Every Trek has a dark episode?

message: I always wondered if this episode represents an alternate timeline because it is completely inconsistent with the end of the series. If so, it should briefly be mentioned in the article.80.141.187.140 (talk) 18:38, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternate timeline?
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Iowa

message: As there are no pictures of these towns, I am requesting for some.
* Asbury
* Balltown
* Bankston
* Bernard
* Centralia
* Durango
* Graf
* Sageville
* Worthington
* Zwingle
If you have pictures of these, upload them and please notify me. Mitch199811 (talk) 01:16, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures of Dubuque county 

message: The redirect Dixie, Iowa is currently being discussed at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 17#Dixie, Iowa, where additional input has been requested. Thryduulf (talk) 19:12, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dixie, Iowa 

message: A Wikidata property for Iowa legislators is proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Iowa legislator ID. Feel free to offer feedback. --Animalparty! (talk) 05:55, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Iowa legislator ID property proposal at Wikidata 

message: I am new to editing on Wikipedia and saw that the page on Ballet Des Moines is not up to date. I would like to make some changes including listing the company members as of 2023 and including their trainee program as part of the education section. Please feel to offer feedback on these changes. Gamezjo (talk) 18:37, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ballet Des Moines article updates
Template talk:WikiProject Iowa

message: I added the ability of the template to track B-Class criteria (using the "B-Class-n=" parameters), borrowing from  and .  I've also left instructions in the template on how to use these new parameters (hopefully these are less intrusive than the ones at ) and added them to the documentation.  --Tim4christ17 talk 12:33, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: C-Class compatibility added. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 08:39, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  B-class criteria 

message: I've put a new version of the template on the sandbox which uses . Would there be any concerns about using it? There would be no loss of functionality. A couple of questions:
#Is the B-class checklist actually desired? There is no mention of it on the project's assessment scale.
#The flag parameter does not seem to be used. (The corresponding category does not even exist.) Do you want it? Or would it be better to use the more common attention parameter?
— Martin (MSGJ · talk) 09:53, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks good to me!  I have no preferences as to flag v. attention, though I would prefer we keep the B-class checklist.  The points on the checklist are required for B-Class according to our assessment scale, so this provides a useful guide for users upgrading the status of the article.  And it is hidden, so it isn't taking up space on the talk page.  --Philosopher Let us reason together. 16:29, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Come to think of it, I'd forgotten there even was a "flag" parameter.  I wouldn't be opposed to removal completely. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 16:32, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: . I removed flag as suggested. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 17:34, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update
Talk:Ross Bay Cemetery

message: Known for desecrating the graves at Ross Bay this satanic cult was loosely based in Vancouver and surrounding BC area. Notable proponents of this cult are the black metal band Blasphemy.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.143.214.64 (talk) 14:51, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ross Bay Cult 

message: I have added some images of Ross Bay Cemetery at commons.wikimedia in case they may be of use.  KenWalker | Talk 16:01, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Are Robert Dunsmuir and Joan Dunsmuir buried at Ross Bay?  --KenWalker | Talk 07:30, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Robert and Joan Dunsmuir 

message: “legendary Ross Bay Cult bestial black metal scene”. I make that four adjectives assuming two are compound. “Ross Bay” is fine; it’s a place, but is it an area on the water or on the land? okay, we are talking about a cemetery so it must mean land. It would be helpful to know to whom or in what way it is legendary. Is it the cult, the scene, or the bay which is legendary? Most people who are reading about the cemetery are going to be lost at “beastial black metal scene“.
I know this means something to the person who wrote it and perhaps a few readers. It would be great if that knowledge could be passed on to more people by explaining it.
An earlier talk topic provides a little explanation but that hasn’t found its way into the article. And it’s not really enough. If “Ross Bay Cult” is an entity, there should be a reference to it at least.
I am sorry to appear difficult but if the goal is to provide information, it is failing. Humphrey Tribble (talk) 05:25, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explain “scene”
Category talk:Wikipedians in Iowa

message: I used the userbox  and it added me to this category.  But I'm from Iowa, not in Iowa, which is the userbox I used - anyone know how that link works?
RickH86 (talk) 13:44, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's the way the template works.  Template:User US state incorporates another template (to get the flag) that puts people in the "in" category.  I'd recommend using one of the Iowa-specific templates.   is for people in Iowa, while the newly created  is for people from Iowa.  --Philosopher Let us reason together. 06:56, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, if you are interested, there is a template available to put an Iowa flag in the corner of your userpage at .  Note that this template will also add you to the from category.  --Philosopher Let us reason together. 07:01, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Users from Iowa aren't necessarily in Iowa 

message: That all seems wrong, I am removing it... but what I am wondering is why there isn't a Des Moines Metro area group yet.
Any objections to me removing this endless category tree? Jayson 'Ace' Frye (talk) 23:59, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: After looking at this further, the issue is the  example in there... I'm going to remove the example, leave the rest. If anyone objects to this, well, is there any other way to do that instead of creating an endless category tree? Jayson 'Ace' Frye (talk) 00:07, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yeesh, well, alright then, I guess it's all over the place with cities & states. I'm putting it back... it's just, eh, I'll get over it. Jayson 'Ace' Frye (talk) 00:26, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I subst'ed the template and removed the category from the subst'ed code.  --Philosopher Let us reason together. 20:03, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subcategory of Wikipedians in Iowa, is Wikipedians in Iowa?
Talk:GR 8 (galaxy)

message: I am truly ignorant of such matters, but I keep seeing references to the declination starting with +14 .  Shenme 08:02, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Declination sign error? 

message: I was looking at the Karl Wilhelm Reinmuth 1916 paper during revision of RAC (revising astronomical catalogs project) and Objects 16 and 18 in the Katalog's position actually matches GR 8, as seen in this PDF here:
https://ngcicproject.observers.org/Historical_Record/Pothier/1916VeHei7-175_Reinmuth.pdf
I've converted Epochs from B1900 to J2000 and it clearly matches the two brighter objects in the galaxy. Snell1185 (talk) 02:54, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  GR 8 (galaxy) is likely discovered by Karl Wilhelm Reinmuth in 1916.
Talk:Ruari McLean

message: Does this page still need a clean-up? I have taken the liberty of removing the tag. I hope that's alright. – Agendum 08:02, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems like a reasonable course of action to me! Budgiekiller 08:09, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup?
Category talk:Wikipedia requested photographs in Iowa

message: Hi, I know many of the Iowa Legislators have photos available on their http://www.legis.state.ia.us website, but I don't know what kind of license I need to use these photos.  I beleive that they are under Fair Use or the Public Domain, but I need to attach a license when I submit them to the Wikimedia Commons.  Kshannon 14:45, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  How to License
Talk:Kangaroo (armoured personnel carrier)

message: At a field workshop (codenamed Kangaroo, hence the name) - they weren't named after the workshop, if anything it was the other way round. 'Kangaroos' got their name because, like the animal, they have a 'pouch' to carry their 'young'.
I suspect the workshop was set up specifically to create the Kangaroo conversions and was named 'Kangaroo' because of it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.40.254.45 (talk) 19:24, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have a verifiable reference for this? Hohum (talk) 19:46, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: Chamberlain & Ellis in British and American Tanks of World War II on page 139 say 102 Priests were converted between October 1944 and April 1945, "carried out at various brigade workshops" GraemeLeggett (talk) 21:35, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  numbers  

message: Deleted the mention of the Lorraine 37L from the article lead. The purpose of the lead is to introduce the topic of the article. In this case, half of it is devoted to another vehicle entirely. I also don't think the Lorraine is notably relevant as it was a small, lightly armored transport vehicle and not a converted tank. Although the  Lorraine VBCP 39L may be considered a fore-runner of modern APCs, the Kangaroo is more closely related to the various tank-derived, heavy APCs used in modern times by the Israelis.Catsmeat (talk) 18:13, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lorraine 37L 

message: at the tank museum bovington uk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-DjcNZWVa0w  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Man74 (talk • contribs) 20:46, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  David Fletcher takes a look at the troop Ram Kangaroo
Talk:List of Colorado ballot measures

message: For the list of initiatives as they make it to the ballot (from linked from this page). Results from the title board which fixes the names that appear on the ballot. Tangurena (talk) 21:41, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  2010 updates 

message: Should there be used a different tone of red for the failed initiatives since the presently chosen is so similar to that of red links? __meco (talk) 09:51, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Color of red 

message: Hello all - Noting that I will be undergoing a major expansion of this article so that it's in line with other articles I've worked on in this area, such as List of Washington ballot measures, List of Florida ballot measures, and List of Wyoming ballot measures. My plan right now is to work in User:ThadeusOfNazereth/sandbox2 and port the expansion over all at once. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)Talk to Me! 16:09, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Logging this expansion as tentatively done - I'm going to get the background section fleshed out more, especially with reference to secondary sources, but will hopefully get this to FL status over the next month or so. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)Talk to Me! 20:55, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article expansion
Talk:Eldon, Iowa

message: Please review the following to get a better idea of what you should add to this article:
# Follow the Wikipedia USCITY guideline for layout and content.
# Look at these great articles for ideas: Lock Haven, Pennsylvania / Stephens City, Virginia / Kent, Ohio / Tulsa, Oklahoma / Grand Forks, North Dakota.
# Please ensure a person meets Wikipedia Notability requirements before adding to the "Notable People" section (if there is one).
Please review the following before editing:
# Document your source by citing a reference to prove your text is verifiable.
# Add only information that has a neutral point of view instead of sounding like an advertisement.
# Read the "Editing, Creating, and Maintaining Articles" chapter from the book Wikipedia : The Missing Manual, .—RifeIdeas Talk  13:04, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important Notes Before Editing This Article 

message: What on earth are "non-families" supposed to be?
It sounds more like something out of the American Gothic picture or similarly-set, small-town rural America novels than a phrase suitable for an Encyclopedia.
Or, perhaps that's the point?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.234.149.192 (talk) 17:36, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "non-families" 
Talk:MacRobertson International Croquet Shield

message: HH124 12:54, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I have no idea and wondered about that myself.   In this, they say "England repeated the feat in 1969 in Australia. And in 1974, now designated Great Britain, they would win...".  I assume that there is a story behind all of this and the change in names in the table is deliberate.  -- I@n 11:30, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And now the team is England again, as the Home Nations compete separately.   England in the Mac, Scotland, Wales and Ireland in the emerging nations team competition.MidlandLinda (talk) 15:32, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  DYK
Talk:List of governors of Iowa

message: This page is missing three territorial governors by presidential appointment - Robert Lucas (1838-1841), John Chambers (1841-1845), and James Clarke (1845-1846).    --Tim4christ17 talk 07:37, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's because they're still on List of Governors of Iowa Territory which hasn't been merged yet. :) --Golbez 08:34, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: My bad - somehow I didn't notice that article.  --Tim4christ17 talk 08:38, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Territorial Governors 

message: If no one objects, I'd like to replace the current term # with Lt. Gov. #, as it seems to be more relevant to a list like this.  This is the format I used for es.wiki's article; you can see it at :es:Gobernador de Iowa. – Philosopher Let us reason together. 22:47, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Seeing no objections, it is . – Philosopher Let us reason together. 03:45, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lt. Gov. # 