Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Circus

message: I've created a template for the time being to get people to know about us--Hailey 19:51, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Template

message: As you may have heard, we at the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial Team recently made some changes to the assessment scale, including the addition of a new level.  The new description is available at WP:ASSESS.
*The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.  
*The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.  
*A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.  
Each WikiProject should already have a new C-Class category at :Category:C-Class_articles.  If your project elects not to use the new level, you can simply delete your WikiProject's C-Class category and clarify any amendments on your project's assessment/discussion pages.  The bot is already finding and listing C-Class articles. 
Please leave a message with us if you have any queries regarding the introduction of the revised scheme.  This scheme should allow the team to start producing offline selections for your project and the wider community within the next year.  Thanks for using the Wikipedia 1.0 scheme! For the 1.0 Editorial Team, §hepBot (Disable) 22:06, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes to the WP:1.0 assessment scheme

message: Wikipedia 0.7 is a collection of English Wikipedia articles due to be released on DVD, and available for free download, later this year. The Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team has made an automated selection of articles for Version 0.7.
We would like to ask you to review the articles selected from this project. These were chosen from the articles with this project's talk page tag, based on the rated importance and quality. If there are any specific articles that should be removed, please let us know at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.7. You can also nominate additional articles for release, following the procedure at Wikipedia:Release Version Nominations. 
A list of selected articles with cleanup tags, sorted by project, is available. The list is automatically updated each hour when it is loaded. Please try to fix any urgent problems in the selected articles. A team of copyeditors has agreed to help with copyediting requests, although you should try to fix simple issues on your own if possible. 
We would also appreciate your help in identifying the version of each article that you think we should use, to help avoid vandalism or POV issues. These versions can be recorded at this project's subpage of User:SelectionBot/0.7. We are planning to release the selection for the holiday season, so we ask you to select the revisions before October 20. At that time, we will use an automatic process to identify which version of each article to release, if no version has been manually selected. Thanks! For the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team, SelectionBot 23:10, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia 0.7 articles have been selected for Circus 

message: Hi!  I'd like to draw your attention to the new WikiProject coordinators' working group, an effort to bring both official and unofficial WikiProject coordinators together so that the projects can more easily develop consensus and collaborate.  This group has been created after discussion regarding possible changes to the A-Class review system, and that may be one of the first things discussed by interested coordinators.
All designated project coordinators are invited to join this working group.  If your project hasn't formally designated any editors as coordinators, but you are someone who regularly deals with coordination tasks in the project, please feel free to join as well. — Delievered by §hepBot (Disable) on behalf of the WikiProject coordinators' working group at 05:08, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: old message, so probably moot now, but FYI your bot's signature includes two  tags but only one , so it shrunk the whole rest of the page. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 17:21, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinators' working group 

message: By the way, here's a relevant discussion about subject development you might find interesting.  
Now back to the question...
The Transhumanist 01:16, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are there enough articles on this subject to justify an [[Outline of circuses]]? 

message: This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 03:09, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP 1.0 bot announcement 

message: Version 0.8 is a collection of Wikipedia articles selected by the Wikipedia 1.0 team for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone.  Articles were selected based on their assessed  importance and quality, then article versions (revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the WikiTrust algorithm.
We would like to ask you to review the Circus articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (♦) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8 with the details.  You may wish to look at your WikiProject's articles with cleanup tags and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Monday, October 11th.
We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of October, 2010.  As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as One Laptop per Child and Wikipedia for Schools to extend the reach of Wikipedia worldwide.  Please help us, with your WikiProject's feedback! 
For the Wikipedia 1.0 editorial team, SelectionBot 22:16, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Circus articles have been selected for the Wikipedia 0.8 release 

message: See Irina Bugrimova. Steven Walling 04:06, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  New stub 

message: Hello there, just a quick note say I've added myself to the Project members list
I'm currently working on the Unicycle article - I only drop in from time to time, but I'm gradually getting the hang of the various wiki rules and so forth.
EdwardLane (talk) 21:34, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hello 

message: I think all of these are circus related and noteworthy - so stubs should be created (ideally by someone who is better at starting stubs than me :) )
Circus child 
Circus to Iraq or Circus2iraq 
Performers without borders   — Preceding unsigned comment added by EdwardLane (talk • contribs) 21:59, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  circus articles that don't exist yet 

message: What makes an article Top High Mid or Low importance to this project?
I'm suggesting this
*top = circus article + international high renown (even if closed) circuses (Chinese State Circus/Moscow State Circus/archaos/cirque du soleil)
*high = other big/renowned circuses, current major act types (trapeze/clowns/fire/acrobatics etc), individuals that made major circuses Barnum/Ringlin, 
*mid = small circuses, famous performers, current minor act types (animals, bearded lady etc), minor circus types (flea circus), laws passed about circuses, large international tours 
*low = specific shows/small tours/acts/props/routines, media about circus, venues etc
I've just been through and tried to assess a bunch of articles based on that EdwardLane (talk) 08:46, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: My only real comment is that I feel some of the major Cirque du Soleil shows should carry more weight. For instance, O, is certainly a very well-known show, and has a ton of technical achievements in performance art for modern cirque. With the rating above it would be considered "Low," yet I feel like it should carry more weight. I don't think all of the shows should be rated higher, but I do feel there are a few with a heavier significance such as: O, Kà, and perhaps a few others. (Brent.austin (talk) 03:42, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I think most of the cirque du soleil performances would probably count as 'tours' rather than 'shows' perhpas I have them around the wrong way.
Modern contemporary circus - is probably closer to theatre
so 
Royal shakespear company = top
the particular play (eg macbeth/accidental death of an anarchist) = high/mid
the particular famous tour - first showing of accidental death by RSC = mid
the particular showing/lesser tour - macbeth in the hammersmith appollo, or 4th tour of accidental death by RSC = low  (unless it's got somthing odd going on - death of lead actor or  something - to promote it to mid).
so I think for instance if there were such articles as the following
*cirque du soleil = top,
*particular show concept = mid or possibly high (if it is a significant as say 'macbeth', but probably mid)
*dralion tour of europe 1926 - low,
*dralion in london = low
*bbc documentary about dralion = low/mid 
*bbc documentary about about cirque du soleil = mid 
probably 
show = mid/tour = low/performance = low
But then trying to tailor that to balance the ratings with traditional circus
where do performers come, and what about the first triple somersault, or the show which had it and the film trapeze or whatever ?
It's a tricky business.
Please have a go at the assessment table yourself and see what you think :)
EdwardLane (talk) 09:07, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

text: I definitely think this is more inline with the modern cirque. I'll take a look at the table soon and see as well. =) Thanks! (Brent.austin (talk) 20:17, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  Ok making it this for now, it can obviously be amended if anyone wants to weigh in 
*top = circus article + international high renown (even if closed) circuses (Chinese State Circus/Moscow State Circus/archaos/cirque du soleil)
*high = other big/renowned circuses, current major act types (trapeze/clowns/fire/acrobatics etc), individuals that made major circuses Barnum/Ringlin, 
*mid = small circuses, famous performers, current minor act types (animals, bearded lady etc), minor circus types (flea circus), laws passed about circuses, large international shows/tours 
*low = specific shows/performances/small tours/acts/props/routines, media about circus, venues etc
EdwardLane (talk) 17:44, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessing articles 

message: Please see this when time allows. It is a proposal to add a mathematical section to the juggling article. I am not a clown, nor an actor/performer but I do enjoy juggling. Actually I am an up-and-coming mathematical physicist.
 
--  F = q(E + v × B) 15:12, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Although you haven't heard much additional feedback in the Juggling talk page, I think it may be worth considering adding the equation you reference to Juggling notation. What you described seems to fit in better there than anywhere else. (Brent.austin (talk) 19:25, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Shannon equation + some theory

message: I have nominated Nik Wallenda for Good Article status.  Please feel free to review or otherwise make suggestions for improvement.
Thanks,
ThaddeusB (talk) 00:26, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Made a couple of comments, I've never gone down the good article nomination/reviewing path so that's probably as much help as I can be. EdwardLane (talk) 09:51, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nik Wallenda - good article nominee 

message: I have no real interest in circus, but love the theatre.  Some months ago, I decided to improve Joseph Grimaldi and spent months researching and writing about him.  The article passed GAC and FAC very quickly and, with the help of others, is now featured content.  I believe this is the projects first.  -- CassiantoTalk 20:19, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: that is very cool, thanks Cassianto, there is a lot of overlap between theatre and more modern circus, and Grimaldi is a very famous name. Good job. EdwardLane (talk) 11:59, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  First FA - [[Joseph Grimaldi]] 

message: Hi everyone at WikiProject Circus!
Women's history month is around the corner, in March, and we're planning the second WikiWomen's History Month.
This event, which is organized by volunteers from the WikiWomen's Collaborative, supports improving coverage about women's history during the month of March. Events take place both offline and online. We are encouraging WikiProjects to focus on women's history related to their subject for the month of March. 
Ideas include:
:*Improving coverage about women in the circus industry - as performers, ringmasters, etc. 
We hope you'll participate! You can list your your project focus here, and also help improve our to-do list. Thank you for all you do for Wikipedia! -- SarahStierch (talk) 22:03, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Women's History Month is in March 

message: Would you mind checking Missing topics abous Circus - Skysmith (talk) 08:34, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Thought that was pretty good - been a bit busy (real life) but I'll have a futher look at it. EdwardLane (talk) 11:42, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing topics page 

message: *Wikipedia:Peer review/List of awards and nominations received by Penn & Teller: Bullshit!/archive1
I've started a list peer review for List of awards and nominations received by Penn & Teller: Bullshit!, feedback to further along the quality improvement process would be appreciated, at Wikipedia:Peer review/List of awards and nominations received by Penn & Teller: Bullshit!/archive1. — Cirt (talk) 01:23, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  List peer review for [[List of awards and nominations received by Penn & Teller: Bullshit!]] 

message: #List of awards and nominations received by Penn & Teller: Bullshit!
#Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by Penn & Teller: Bullshit!/archive1
I've started a Featured List nomination for List of awards and nominations received by Penn & Teller: Bullshit!.
Participation would be appreciated, at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by Penn & Teller: Bullshit!/archive1.
Thank you for your time,
— Cirt (talk) 15:26, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured List nomination for List of awards and nominations received by Penn & Teller: Bullshit! 

message: Hi all,
My name is Adi Khajuria and I am helping out with Wikimania 2014 in London.
One of our initiatives is to create leaflets to increase the discoverability of various wikimedia projects, and showcase the breadth of activity within wikimedia. Any kind of project can have a physical paper leaflet designed - for free - as a tool to help recruit new contributors. These leaflets will be printed at Wikimania 2014, and the designs can be re-used in the future at other events and locations.
This is particularly aimed at highlighting less discoverable but successful projects, e.g:
• Active Wikiprojects: Wikiproject Medicine, WikiProject Video Games, Wikiproject Film
• Tech projects/Tools, which may be looking for either users or developers.
• Less known major projects: Wikinews, Wikidata, Wikivoyage, etc.
• Wiki Loves Parliaments, Wiki Loves Monuments, Wiki Loves ____
• Wikimedia thematic organisations, Wikiwomen’s Collaborative, The Signpost
The deadline for submissions is 1st July 2014
For more information or to sign up for one for your project, go to: 
Project leaflets
Adikhajuria (talk) 12:09, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leaflet for Wikiproject Circus at Wikimania 2014 

message: Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment on the WikiProject X proposal 

message: Hello everyone!
You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!
Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.
Harej (talk) 16:57, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject X is live! 

message: here are some very impressive pathe news reels of juggling, there is probably the option to flesh out a few articles on the various historical performers of various different types trapeze for instance gets 105 entries EdwardLane (talk) 05:33, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pathe news reels 

message: My list of missing topics about circus is updated - Skysmith (talk) 13:35, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing topics list 

message: Hi all,
Rossa Matilda Richter was a circus performer who, about 140 years ago, became the first human cannonball at the age of 14. I started the article a while back when I first came across a short blog post about her and have more recently returned to do quite a bit of work to it. I've just tagged it for GAN and would welcome feedback, edits, or a review by anyone so inclined. It's far from perfect (see the talk page for some comments about what's missing/unclear), but based on what I've found in terms of sources, it seems like our article is now about the best overall source about her out there. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 16:02, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Rhododenrites, dunno if I can help much but I'll take a look EdwardLane (talk) 17:15, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  That's great, thanks. Since leaving this message I've also sent it to WP:PR. It may be unusual to have it at GAN and PR at the same time, but I feel like it's probably good enough for GA already and hope to use PR to get feedback with an eye towards FA. So there are lots of options for feedback now, but nobody has taken any of them up yet. :) i.e. a GA review, formal peer review, casual talk page/wikiproject page comments (or none of the above!) :) Any notes/edits helpful regardless. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 17:25, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Well I've had a look, but the article is in too good a state for me to be able to make a meaningful contribution - good job :) EdwardLane (talk) 17:31, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rossa Matilda Richter 

message: A new Newsletter directory has been created to replace the old, out-of-date one. If your WikiProject and its taskforces have newsletters (even inactive ones), or if you know of a missing newsletter (including from sister projects like WikiSpecies), please include it in the directory! The template can be a bit tricky, so if you need help, just post the newsletter on the template's talk page and someone will add it for you.
:– Sent on behalf of Headbomb. 03:11, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A new newsletter directory is out! 

message: Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for information on WP1.0 web tool 

message: Introducing the Circus Barnstar. Jerm (talk) 18:52, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Barnstar 

message: I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like
*John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.)
and turns it into something like
* John Smith "" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.
It will work on a variety of links, including those from ,  and .
The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.
Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.
-  Headbomb {t · c · p · b}
This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  User script to detect unreliable sources 

message: Draft:Skeeter Reece need sources to support WP:GNG, help appreciated. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 11:44, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Draft on a clown