lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Gabriel Long

message: Greetings all.  I was pleasantly surprised to see this article here on Wiki.  My (many times)great grandfather was Evans, brother to Gabriel.  The article states Gab's father and grandfather fought in the French - Indian Wars, and that he descended from the Longs of Wraxall.  Does anyone have a geneology history of this?  My info only goes back so far, with no mention of his grandfather, nor the link to the Wraxalls.  Thanks for the help.  TarkenA (talk) 15:02, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Floyd McKissick Jr.

message: Before this degerates into a mad edit war, I recommend you state your case for the addition/removal from this link [] --CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 17:03, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit war 

message: I came across this article via :User talk:Materialscientist#You undid changes bt me on Floyd McKissick Jr, Page. I think the claims about McKissick not paying for renovations and about being in favor of the decriminalization of marijuana qualify as contentious per :WP:BLPSOURCES and therefore should not be simply tagged with "citation needed" and "by whom". The burden should be on the person(s) wanting to include such information in the article to provide reliable sources in support. I tried looking for sources which might be used, but didn't find any. Perhaps someone else will have better luck, but until then I think it's better to err on the side of caution here. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:27, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsupported claims 

message: I have just removed that section, with this edit.
I think it is WP:UNDUE, it's a relatively minor incident, which only has local-level news coverage from a single source.
I considered this matter before taking action. I asked for input on the BLP Noticeboard, and a user responded;
 diff ()
I agree with the above; I also would not object to an appropriate simple sentence.
If anyone objects, let's discuss it here. Best, 86.20.193.222 (talk) 01:10, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Professional misconduct charges
Talk:Allhallows-on-Sea railway station

message: When starting to edit this I got a notice that an article with this name had previously been created and deleted. I was unable to find out what it contained or why it was deleted. Have created the new article myself without using any text from the deleted article. All other stations on the Hundred of Hoo Railway have articles, and it would be perverse for Allhallows station not to have an article now. Mjroots (talk) 15:06, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Previously deleted article?
Talk:Timeline (disambiguation)

message: Timeline is going to need its own article soon; it is a distinct concept from Chronology, and from the disambiguated articles listed here. -- Yamara 15:10, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Note on creation of page

message: I can't find any mention of the concept of alternate timelines, as widely explored in literature and film, where a change in initial circumstances, possibly caused by a time traveller, leads to different events unfolding. Concepts such as the butterfly effect and parallel universes would be pertinent to an explanation Adagio67 (talk) 09:43, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  the concept of 'alternate timelines'
Talk:Irving Gottesman

message: This guy seems to have been a eugenecist - yet get sense from this article of almost the opposite because it only mentions he was critical of the Nazi eugenics activities. Does mention in organizations Society for the Study of Social Biology which I've now wikilinked but I imagine he was a member for a lot longer than vice director - back to when it was called the American Eugenics Society? And apparently in 1971 he jointly published that eugenics should be based on an assessment of supposed socioeconomic value and supposed 'rational elitism', no mention of this? Anyone more familiar with his work please? Wishfulness (talk) 10:14, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eugenics 
Talk:Workforce Strategy Center

message: WSC's entry is not unlike entries from other nonprofit organizations listed on Wikipedia.  We did careful research and editing to respond to comments and conform to the guidelines.   WSC's Wikipedia entry is now linked to the Career Pathways Wikipedia entry.  Career Pathways is a growing movement that has emerged over the past decade in the U.S. of which WSC is a part.Buckleyre (talk) 15:29, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Comment posted to Jalssid talk page:
 *You've recently asserted the importance of Workforce Strategy Center including references that you feel assert the notability of said organization.  Have you added those sources to the article yet? Adding the sources to the deletion discussion is not the same thing as adding them to the article.  Please let me know if you need assistance with how to do this.  Thanks,   Keeper  |  76 01:21, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for your suggestions. As you can tell I am new at this. We have added some links to mainstream and trade coverage of our work. Several of the publications charge for access to their archived material so I am not sure how to add cite them in the article. Any other suggestions would be appreciated. Jalssid (talk) 18:50, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Entry
Talk:Some People Have Real Problems

message: I'm not sure how to add a review, but I know rolling stone has reviewed this album and it's on their website. QuirkyAndSuch (talk) 14:58, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Review

message: The StarCon Records blue link on the side goes to a page for a role play convention. Anybody with more expertise wanna fix this?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.147.232.105 (talk) 17:18, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  StarCon Records? 

message: *http://www.thefader.com/2008/01/30/some-people-have-real-problems
HĐ (talk) 12:23, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source
File talk:Languages of Europe.svg

message: Scottish is spelled wrong on the map (Scothish)
LOL @ Polish/Slovak borders  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.150.77.248 (talk) 18:12, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That should be labelled Gaidhlig or Scottish Gaelic, not Scottish.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.57.133.232 (talk) 19:18, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

message: Why is Alemannic shown as a language in Switzerland while the German regions where it is spoken are not shown and when Alemannic is shown, where is Bavarian and Low German?? Alemannic should be deleted, t's a dialect and not a language.Johnny2323 (talk) 22:23, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alemannic? 

message: Where is Occitan on this map?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.57.133.232 (talk) 19:11, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Occitan? 

message: * CROATIAN LANGUAGE  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Croatian_language
* SERBIAN LANGUAGE  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serbian_language  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.0.228.5 (talk) 13:36, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: SERBO-CROATIAN NO LANGUAGE
Talk:RRS Discovery (1962)

message: RRS Discovery IV is currently being built in Vigo in Galicia at Freire Shipyard (C.N.P. Freire) with internal systems overseen by Kongsberg. It's scheduled to do sea trials over the summer of 2013, and begin active service during autumn 2013, and be available for science from 2014.
sources:
http://www.ship-technology.com/projects/rrs-discovery/
http://noc.ac.uk/research-at-sea/ships/rrs-discovery-replacement
I am assigned to work on this ship.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.166.230.63 (talk) 18:39, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
Talk:List of Mozilla products

message: I don't see a mention of Mozilla Labs or Weave here, are you waiting for the release of Firefox 3? --192.154.91.225 (talk) 15:51, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Mozilla Labs?

message: I don't see the standalone version of Chatzilla. They are not widely used, but they're still products, and Firefox and Thunderbird were originally only streamlined versions of Mozilla Navigator and Mozilla Mail & News (now named SeaMonkey). — SvartMan (talk) 16:28, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Standalone versions of SeaMonkey products? 

message: I don't see the standalone version of Chatzilla. They are not widely used, but they're still products, and Firefox and Thunderbird were originally only streamlined versions of Mozilla Navigator and Mozilla Mail & News (now named SeaMonkey). — SvartMan (talk) 16:56, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Standalone versions of SeaMonkey products? 

message: Firefox Monitor should be added to the List, but as I have a CoI I shouldnt add it myself. Rraue (talk) 12:37, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Firefox Monitor
Talk:Peter Caffrey

message: I've removed the wikification of the film titles as they have perfectly good entries at IMDB and no entries here (and no reason to create them.) Also, I removed the stub classification as the article is now pretty detailed. Be best (talk) 15:56, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Duchy of Silesia

message: The article mentions the Holy Roman Emperor in 1063, but Henry IV only received that crown in 1084. Olessi (talk) 21:57, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Wasn't there an Emperor in 1063? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  22:04, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Henry III died in 1056. His successor, Henry IV, was King of the Romans until his actual coronation as Holy Roman Emperor in 1084. Olessi (talk) 22:36, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd expect you are correct, and the error stems from not very high quality of sources used (unreferenced wiki translation). I have corrected them (hopefully). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  16:31, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Holy Roman Emperor

message: This supposed source is pure Polish nationalist propaganda, and, of course, unreadable by anyone but Poles. Wikipeida has permitted itself to become a vehicle for Polish nationalists who have rewritten the history of their region.
Historia Narodu Śląskiego. Prawdziwe dzieje ziem śląskich od średniowiecza do progu trzeciego tysiąclecia (History of Silesian Nation. True history of Silesian lands from the Middle Ages to the threshold of the third Millennium), Zabrze 2003 ISBN 83-919589-0-6. 2A00:23C4:B607:CF00:ADCB:6450:98F:2A7F (talk) 08:51, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Propaganda
Talk:Shower (disambiguation)

message: Er, has anyone got any source to cite for this "shower" being someone whose penis is showing? Google didn't seem to, nor OED website. For anyone interested, I'm researching into Samuel Beckett's play "Happy Days" in which Winnie tells a small story about a Mr and Mrs Shower. Was wondering about the implications of the word. Should these characters be included on the Disambiguation anyway? 81.154.28.80 15:58, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: I dont think this disambiguation page should have every article which has "shower" in its name. thats not the purpose of a disambig page. I think it should be limited to article names which are just "shower" or which people might be likely to simply type "shower" when searching for them. I agree that the japanese "showa" should be here, thats very clever use. Ill wait for any comments before trimming this.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 15:35, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too detailed
Talk:Proton Wira

message: The segment "Proton Wira as a tuner's car" lacks any references, neutral point of view or anything else that would make it encyclopedic - I'd almost see it as vandalism. But as I don't know the malaysian street racing scene, I can't judge whether there is any merit to it. I'd suggest a thorough rewrite by someone with the necessary knowledge or, in case such a person doesn't show up, the deletion of the part. --K-carsten (talk) 02:50, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: As there's no response so far, I'll just delete the paragraph - it's probably anyways beyond repair. --K-carsten (talk) 01:07, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:To Each His Own Cinema

message: I proposed a merge with To Each His Cinema. Please see Talk:To Each His Cinema. Jeff-themovie (talk) 16:26, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The merger so obviously needed to be done that I went ahead and did it. The question however remains as to which title it should be listed under. I too would support your proposal to list it under Chacun son cinéma. Mutt (talk) 12:43, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: An editor using various dynamic IPs has been removing the DVD cover image, with a comment on the last occurrence of "pic not correct". Typically, when a film is released on DVD, there will be a number of different covers (in different markets etc) and there is not necessarily a single definitive "correct" version. I've done some searching and the DVD cover shown looks to be a valid one. However, If anyone thinks the picture is actually incorrect and that no such DVD cover exists, please explain your reasoning and please try to find some evidence of what you consider the correct one rather than just blanking the existing one. But even if there is a more widely-used cover, a picture of a valid alternative that we do have is always going to be better than a picture we don't have -- Boing! said Zebedee 11:37, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of image 

message: The same editor, as above, has also remove categories from this article, without explanation. It's clearly the same editor every time (who has also been removing content from other film-related articles) - using dynamic IP addresses controlled by Bharti Broadband in Hyderabad or Secunderabad, India. To that editor - if you think there is anything actually wrong with this article, then please explain why here on this Talk page before you remove content. Otherwise, please just stop it - you are doing nothing but wasting your time (and it only takes a single click to revert your changes). -- Boing! said Zebedee 08:52, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Anonymous removals
Talk:Bailey Gatzert (sternwheeler)

message: this is not a good image of the Bailey Gatzert, but was only one readily located in Wikipedia.  Any better image appreciated.Mtsmallwood (talk) 06:42, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: *https://oregonencyclopedia.org/articles/bailey_gatzert/#.WT9IDRiZNo4 ---Another Believer (Talk) 02:04, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source 
File talk:Doawaron45lp.jpg

message: I have improved the fair use rationale for this image to make it, I believe, consistent with WP:NFCC#10c. Please let me know if anything further needs to be done to make the fair use rationale meet Wikipedia standards. Thank you! Moisejp (talk) 16:32, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use rationale
Talk:Prasco Laboratories

message: Initially setting importance to 'mid' as this would seem to be one of many generic manufacturers, this one relatively small compared to some.  --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 18:07, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Importance in relation to WP Companies

message: How can I list standard company information? —Preceding unsigned comment added by PrascoLabs (talk • contribs) 16:32, 4 January 2008
:I'm not quite sure what you're asking, but you might find an infobox is what you need. If you can't work out how it functions, please ask again here. You could also look at Wikipedia:Companies, corporations and economic information which gives a lot of useful info. Don't forget the need to comply with these criteria and to cite your sources. Kim Dent-Brown (Talk) 17:38, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm still unsure if you are asking a technical or an editorial question. If the former, go to the Teva article, click on the 'edit this article' tab at the top and you can see, copy and modify the markup the editors there have used. If you're asking an editorial question ("How do I prevent my article being deleted?") then the answer is to demonstrate notability. The Teva article is not brilliantly sourced, but does have references to independent sources and as a NASDAQ-100 company is arguably notable almost by definition. As Prasco is not so big, you will have to find alternative sources to attest to its notability. If there are insufficient, you may have to resign yourself to the article being deleted. Kim Dent-Brown (Talk) 19:06, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Listing standard company information

message: Technically, the CSD tag is justified.  The article doesn't make clear why this company is important.  However, if this company owns Ambien and Allegra, it is clearly notable; the importance of these drugs needs to be made more explicit in the article, though. Some data about sales of these drugs in their category would help in this regard.  --Richard (talk) 23:23, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: As far as I can see from the article, the company doesn't own these drugs: it manufactures generic equivalents of them. I still don't think this article demonstrates notability and will reinstate a notability tag and take the article to WP:AfD for discussion. Kim Dent-Brown (Talk) 14:01, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing speedy deletion tag
File talk:War on 45 cover.jpg

message: I have improved the fair use rationale for this image to make it, I believe, consistent with WP:NFCC#10c. Please let me know if anything further needs to be done to make the fair use rationale meet Wikipedia standards. Sincerely, Moisejp (talk) 16:33, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use rationale
Talk:John Avery McIlhenny

message: This article received a couple of tags from administrators, including a speedy deletion tag, during the first half-hour or so of its creation:  However, I was actively expanding the original stub when these tags were added.  Please delay deletion or other tags because I intend to finish the article momentarily.  Thanks, --Skb8721 (talk) 16:40, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks fine now. Sorry but this seems to have been a case of overzealous deletion tagging. If someone does delete this article, contact me and I'll handle it. --W.marsh 17:17, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Delay on Speedy Deletion

message: It's from 1898, so why would it be copyrighted? Biruitorul (talk) 00:09, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The modern-day print from which the image was scanned comes from a private archives.  Wikipedia has permission to use it, but others would not have permission to use it.  --Skb8721 (talk) 00:44, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image
Talk:Élisabeth Charlotte d'Orléans

message: Surname of members of the Orléans family is *d'Orléans*, not *of Orléans* - *of* is used after a title given in English, such as, Philippe d'Orléans, Duke of Orléans. Changing name in title of article, and will do same to others of the Orléans family.  Frania W. (talk) 23:57, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Name in title

message: Was she not regent of Lorraine in her son's absence in 1729-37? If so, it is the most important and should be included. --85.226.46.84 (talk) 18:57, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regent? 

message: There is too much genealogy in this article. The article is not about her relatives or family, it is about her - or, it should be. Her relatives each have their own article.--85.226.47.128 (talk) 15:26, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Unfortunately, most articles about French princesses and some articles about Spanish infantas look like this. I really don't understand how siblings one may have never met can be relevant enough to be listed in a biography article. I also don't understand why we need to mention that she is an "ancestress of the House of Habsburg-Lorraine" - she certainly wasn't the only one nor the most significant one. Wikipedia is not a geneaology database. Surtsicna (talk) 16:31, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article = geneology
Talk:PLASA Show

message: I've undone some of the edits for style reasons - the content, particularly in the introduction, read too much like an advert rather than an encyclopaedic entry and contained uncited numbers which did not help to improve the useful, verifyable content of the article.  The style should be as objective as possible and if numbers are included then an attempt to reference published evidence must be made.  
Its nice to see the history section vastly improved though, its much more detailed and useful than before.  SheffGruff (talk) 22:11, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Undone

message: If you have any further information on the show please add it, especially if you know anything about the history of it over the years.  SheffGruff (talk) 16:40, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:Josh A. Moore

message: Is there any good way to turn this article into prose instead of a bunch of bullet points? matt91486 (talk) 19:21, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:1990 Manjil–Rudbar earthquake

message: Surprising that such a major and dramatic event would have such a short English Wikipedia page. The "Use in media" section almost looks misplaced here next to ... pretty much nothing else. The Farsi page seems to be much more complete. https://fa.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D8%B2%D9%85%DB%8C%D9%86%E2%80%8C%D9%84%D8%B1%D8%B2%D9%87_%DB%B1%DB%B3%DB%B6%DB%B9_%D8%B1%D9%88%D8%AF%D8%A8%D8%A7%D8%B1_%D9%88_%D9%85%D9%86%D8%AC%DB%8C%D9%84. Would be great to have a Native speaker give it a shot.
MarmotteiNoZ 00:57, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Even looking only at available English language sources, there is a wealth of information available. Something to add to my "to do list" - not sure when I'll get round to that though. Mikenorton (talk) 08:46, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disappointingly short 

message: Why has FIFA World Cup entry been deleted while it had a source? Even if the reverter thought the earthquake wasn't one of the reasons for high number of deaths they could edit that section and just delete parts saying that. But they could remain the parts that said the earthquake happened during a World Cup match as a fact. Aminabzz (talk) 11:00, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  FIFA World Cup
Talk:Middlesex Sessions House

message: So, it appears this could well be the next SCIENTOLOGY LONDON CELEBRITY CENTRE  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zoara2010 (talk • contribs) 04:00, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Scientology Purchase: Possible Future [[Celebrity Centre]]
Talk:Barbie Fairytopia: Magic of the Rainbow

message: Honestly what kind of idiot made this article? It's called the "Flight of Spring" not the "Dance of Spring"! Should I have to post an illegal video link to prove myself? Geez.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.202.46.116 (talk) 10:06, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: The Flight of Spring

message: OMG! It's in Wikipedia again?! Delete it and don't turn back. It's confirmed fake. L/L. 95.58.139.146 (talk) 14:06, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Magical Twist of Time