Talk:Animation:Master

message: No way this article is neutral. It's more like an atvertisement converted to a wikipedia article.
:edit: I've reverted the article to a few edits in the past. The article is much shorter now, but pretty much neutral. Cristan 20:38, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: As a user of the software, I'm sympathetic to what the unregistered user was trying to do, but the mention of a project "currently" in operation by the company for its userbase has a certain timeliness that is inappropriate for an encyclopedic reference.  Additional links added were also removed, as they can be accessed by navigating through the main site already listed. MDonfield 01:53, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed edits by 83.70.34.89 

message: So what's up with the Dr. Mr. Esq. thing? Using all those titles is a little advert-like, and pretty presumptuous if you ask me Inigo07 (talk) 20:29, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: So you've met Martin, then? :) JeffJonez (talk) 18:17, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

text: Nope. But as 3D animation is my profession, I've talked with colleagues about this program. It's supposed to be a joke and the sales hype from Hash is supposed to be ridiculous. Inigo07 (talk) 17:58, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  A joke, I'll agree with. My school's 3D Animation courses use it, and I dropped a second quarter because the software was so horrible. I'll bet it was that sales hype that got the course provider to use the program in their educational materials. I personally don't think A:M is worth the $200 price tag. I'm probably violating TPGs here, aren't I? :) Tuvok[T@lk/Improve] 07:38, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Ranting aside, I've found sources that indicate Mr. Hash is both a PhD and a Lawyer, but I've conceded that these honorifics aren't relevant. And yes, ranting about the quality of the software on it's talk page is off track. :) JeffJonez (talk) 04:30, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Developer Name 

message: I've noticed that other 3D app articles are allowed to run to extended length even though they have no more to reasonably cover in an encyclopedia article, but the Animation:Master article keeps getting chopped down to a few lines.  The software is not a "joke", it is highly powerful and functional, regardless of the experience of some kid in a high school class who couldn't figure it out.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.152.114.156 (talk) 06:43, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  biased editing decisions 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Animation:Master. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070806012657/http://mag.awn.com:80/index.php?ltype=pageone&article_no=1586 to http://mag.awn.com/index.php?ltype=pageone&article_no=1586
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:50, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified