Talk:Ann Coulter

message: XOR'easter: I think the cite to a 2011-08-25 blog post that you added to the article yesterday linked to National Geographic is actually of a blog post written for Discover. Carl Zimmer's blog went to National Geographic on 2012-12-11. I don't believe you should have added this cite. Peter Gulutzan (talk) 14:36, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems within the letter and the spirit of WP:NEWSBLOG, wherever it was originally hosted. XOR'easter (talk) 16:42, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

text: Does anybody agree with XOR'easter? Peter Gulutzan (talk) 15:28, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Yup. I see nothing wrong with it. --Hob Gadling (talk) 10:44, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

text: I don't see where it is listed as a blog/editorial.  While it clearly is analysis/commentary unless we can show that Discover/NG didn't apply editorial review I can't see objecting on the grounds it is a blog.  Springee (talk) 12:32, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I was willing to accept the word of Carl Zimmer that The Loom was a blog and he was a blogger. But I acknowledge that most people support XOR'easter's edit. Peter Gulutzan (talk) 13:52, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I see he calls it a blog.  I would say NEWSBLOG applies to this content.  Since it is being used as a second source I don't think it's needed.  I think it is violating the text of NEWBLOG since it isn't being used as an attributed claim but I don't think this would violate the spirit since we have a first source that was saying the same thing.  If this were the only source I would say it needs to be attributed.  As is, not worth too much effort either way.  Springee (talk) 15:12, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Citing a Carl Zimmer blog post

message: Coulter has maintained for years that she doesn't think women should have the right to vote. Here. Here she elaborates that women "have no capacity to understand how money is earned." There are many other citations about Coulter's controversial statements about women. Why isn't there anything in the Controversies section? MarkB2 Chat 04:50, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversies 

message: Ann Coulter flat-out told Nikki Haley to "go back to her country", then brought up cow worship and rat temples in a rant about India. I’m not sure if that’s worth mentioning in this article, although it’s unusual since Haley is a fellow Republican. She hasn’t endorsed Trump yet, as far as I know, and it’s not clear who she actually supports for president in 2024. She really needs to tone it down a bit, because she keeps making more enemies for herself as well. 2604:2D80:6984:3800:0:0:0:EBA2 (talk) 05:51, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments on 2024 Presidential Campaign 

message: Change "Coulter advocates intelligent design, a pseudoscientific antievolution ideology." to "Coulter advocates intelligent design."
The clause is irrelevant commentary and indicates bias. Simply footnote the wiki entry for intelligent design. Gsurf76 (talk) 03:26, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the  template. Hyphenation Expert (talk) 05:20, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 15 November 2023