lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Cape Breton Highlands National Park

message: I'll be out there in two weeks (Early Sept.)  I'll see if I can get any decent pictures for the article. Apfejes 22:44, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

message: They should say Canada lynx and coyote rather than lynx and eastern coyote.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:18D:4701:C4A0:68C1:7541:1B16:26DF (talk) 20:30, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Animals 

message: Should it say lynx and eastern coyote rather than Canada lynx and coyote?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.86.71.225 (talk) 14:08, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Animals edit 

message: Should the changes say lynx and coyote rather and Canada lynx and eastern coyote? I want to keep these changes.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.86.71.225 (talk) 17:16, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes
Talk:Westnet

message: Westnet.com.au should not be mixed up with westnet.net.au 220.233.48.200 11:18, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Added emphasis -Shaddowofadream 05:21, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Ambiguous

message: I was thinking of adding a basic list of the products & services that westnet provide
*Dialup & ISDN
*ADSL & related hardwares
*PSTN Full Service (line rental & local calls)
*Long Distance 
*Website / Domain Hosting
*etc
So to represent Westnets full range of products and not just a Service provider. 
Ideally a timeline of when these products & services were added to the companys range would be good, but perhaps difficult to obtain.
-Shaddowofadream 05:21, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Products & Services

message: I found that some parts of this article; namely the "Broadband ADSL Internet", "Satellite Broadband" and "Dialup Internet" sounded like they were promoting Westnet, instead of providing neutral information.  A rewrite may be necessary.
Jonoerik (talk) 09:40, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That's not too surprising considering this post made to the conflict of interest noticeboard today: Wikipedia:COIN#Westnet. I think that the whole "awards" section should be removed personally - there are no citations and they don't really tell the reader anything. If any of the awards are notable themselves (i.e. there is an article about the award) then they can stay but otherwise they should go. I'll wait a week or so before removing them, please comment if you agree or disagree with this. Thanks Smartse (talk) 03:49, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that most of those were non-notable but I have found cites for about 2 of the awards, which were kept. Jwoodger (talk) 04:26, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertisment
Talk:Gros Morne National Park

message: IMDB lists several films which include Gros Morne as a filming location, including Outlander[2008] and Contact [1997]. 
Pete318 (talk) 20:00, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gros Morne in the Movies..... 
Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Disambiguation pages/Archive 10

message: I am tired of me being the only one using certain dab subcategories and spinoff templates.  I want to round up some Wikipedians to change from the generic  template to one of the spinoff templates.  There are just too many generic dabs, and most dabs that fit in one of the subcats only carries the generic template.  I want Wikipedians to get rid of generic dab templates for select dabs on sight! --SuperDude 04:02, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neglected dab using generic dab templates 

message: We've gone around and around in circles on the Congo page.  Anyone else want to try? Tedernst | talk 21:52, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting crowd that hangs out on Congo.  I made what I thought were some reasonably conservative changes and got called a "style-guide fascist" :-)  --RoySmith 18:27, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Congo]] 

message: Has anyone made a template which advises people that a dab page doesn't adhere to these style guidelines?  Among other things, people could then be directed to discuss the guidelines on that article's talk page instead of here.  It could also advise that more entries exist and someone with more time should look into it (e.g., Taylor which is missing the various Bobs and Bobbys and doesn't link to the Robert dab and probably has many more omissions).  wknight94 15:20, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I think what you want is , which also puts the article in :Category:Disambiguation pages in need of cleanup, which is trolled by people willing to help fix these pages up.  --RoySmith 16:23, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you are correct!  wknight94 17:17, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I hope fixing does not mean unwikifing everything that does not fit the idea of the dab-crew here. Tobias Conradi (Talk) 18:34, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template advisory for dab pages that don't follow these guidelines? 

message: *links to dabbed articles
*alternative: link to the closest related item if no article exists
*explanation with comma, stating where the item belongs to
**larger topic, geographic region...
*explanation in brackets
**especially for 2LAs + TLAs etc citing code sources
*...
Maybe this structuring helps to understand the dab texts better. Tobias Conradi (Talk) 17:03, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  whats on a dab page
Talk:Red Faction II

message: Why isn't it mentioned anywhere in the article that this game was terrible compared to the first? Metacritic gives it lower reviews across the board.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.242.232.196 (talk) 14:14, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Is this true?
>x<ino 11:27, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The story section is too in-universe; readers with no knowledge of this game (like me) or its prequel will not understand the story. I've added a in-universe tag to this section; it needs to be cleaned up.  BishopTutu 22:26, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Story Section is "In-Universe" 

message: From current revision: 'Previously, players were not allowed to organize teams or special modes of play. Red Faction II features Deathmatch, Bagman, Arena (all available with either individual or team play), Capture the Flag, and "Regime" (an unlockable mode equivalent to Bagman), all played across a large selection of levels.'. What does it mean, 'not allowed to organize teams'? The Windows version of RF1 (no idea about the others) had both team deathmatch and CTF, and players were allowed to switch teams at any time during a game. --DocumentN (talk) 21:33, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Team play 

message: This article would better suit Wikpedia's Encyclopedic content if it were to be cleaned up. For example, the third paragraph of the intro section should be made into it's own section titled "Changes From Red Faction". Next, the story section should be summarized into 5 paragraphs or less, like in the Red Faction (series) article. Also, adding references would greatly help the article as well.
GroundZ3R0 002 (talk) 01:56, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean Up 

message: In game character bios show the year 2161 as the year when the squad was nano-enhanced, so 2080 can't be true. This is also peculiar as the Red Faction 3 article says the events of that game take place in 2125. The manual makes no mention of any year and I didn't spot any years mentioned in-game, other than that the first mission happens two years prior to the rest of the game. --Enmoku (talk) 19:30, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  In the year 2080 

message: I personally thought it to be totally unresponsible to NOT place the reason why this game can't be played anymore nowadays, at least by the majority of the players who own Windows 7 and GPU's wit hDX10 or higher, so I placed it with reference to it. --Jorre22225 (talk) 10:43, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsupported

message: Why the hell is this page protected, and why is there no header stating it is protected?
Asinine.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.57.4.45 (talk) 20:06, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected?
Talk:Cypher (Warhammer 40,000)

message: ave any one got the ifo on the warhammer figure cypher as i brought him but don't know how to use him need his stats as well plz —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.162.76.82 (talk • contribs) .
: 'tis not legal to disseminate stats like that. It's in a WD (US 285 or something, I think), Heroes and Villains section. It may also be in a Chapter Approved somewhere. It's illegal to actually post stats online, though, so you'll have to do the work yourself. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 194.72.50.153 (talk • contribs) .
:: Well, it's in Australian WD 281 if nowhere else. This is why we have a References section in the article :-) Cheers --Pak21 09:23, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Ukkusiksalik National Park

message: Courtesy User:WeHaWoe.
The German version of this article is much more complete than the English version.
Can you help clean up this translation and prepare it for the English article?
Cbaer (talk) 00:53, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: To avoid spoiling this talk, I first put the rough translation to the sub-page /rough translation from deWP. I have to admit that I'm neither invoved in geography, nor in inuit history, zoology or botany [I did the job because Cbaer asked for it, and it's Christmaqs time ;)]. Therefore, a lot of work is to be left to specialists. Besides, I do not think it's useful to incorporate all of the deWP text into the en article (trekking routes, for instance, might rather be omitted). I'll do one part still missing (which I'd forgotten) and a few minor amendments tomorow, and then will leave it. There is life outside wikipedia, too, I'm told ;)) -- WeHaWoe (talk) 15:18, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As Ansgar meanwhile edited that formerly rough translation, it (or at least, most of it) should be used for the article, I think. WeHaWoe (talk) 13:48, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done! I tried to merge the two articles - see what you think. There is undoubtedly   editing yet to do (take a look!) but what we have so far looks quite good... Cbaer (talk) 16:39, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: ACK. -- WeHaWoe (talk) 23:26, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Initial translation from deWP article, 

message: I came to update the link to Baker Lake and noticed that the vegetation includes "mountain avens". The link was to geum but mountain avens is Dryas octopetala and I changed the link to that.
There was a link to Lake trout with the Latin "Salmo trutta lacturis" but that appears to be a misspelling of "Salmo trutta lacustris". However, "Salmo trutta lacustris" is the Brown trout and the Latin for Lake trout is "Salvelinus namaycush".
There was a mention in the opening of "dwarf birch" which is Betula nana. Later in the flora section it gave "Betula glandulosa" as the Latin for dwarf birch but that is the "American Dwarf Birch" so I linked to both. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 22:48, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Last edits
Talk:Seven Melbourne

message: What happend to my Seven Broadcasting Centre photo? :( --Jamesbehave 11:46, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was never listed at WP:RM, and forgotten about. Patstuarttalk|edits 20:38, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

message: :Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your vote with ~~~~
*Support DynaBlast 06:27, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Voting
Talk:MJ Hibbett

message: References moved here from main article:
Hibbett is often compared to Billy Bragg.
(The Day that Thatcher's Dead)
He is from Peterborough...
(The Peterborough All-Saints Wide Game Team (group B))
...in East Anglia.
(I come from the Fens)
In appearance he resembles an adult Harry Potter.
(The Black Hair and Glasses Brigade)
With his band the Validators
(We are the Validators)
he came to widespread online notice in 2000 with an ode to the ZX Spectrum and other home microcomputers of the 1980s.
(Hey Hey 16K)
In 2004 he gained national exposure in the United Kingdom by singing a song with regularly updated lyrics reflecting the ongoing events of the football World Cup on BBC Radio 1.
(The Fair Play Trophy (again), again,
again and again)
He lives and works in London
(Bands from London)
and holds down a day job as a database administrator.
(Work's all right (if it's a proper job), Payday is the best day)
He is an enthusiast of public houses.
(Hibbett's golden rules of beer, Sod it, let's get pissed) 
CLW 11:44, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: "CLW, you have ripped all supporting context out of the article and turned good writing into bland mediocrity." This is nonsense - the article was almost unreadable before due to the references being embedded within the text. All I did was to wikify the article and to remove the unecyclopedic details. Wikipedia articles should not be in the style of music magazine articles. CLW 22:50, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Wood Buffalo National Park

message: Wikapedia's own article on that language family says so http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algonquian_languages
and so has every other article I have ever seen. 65.79.173.135 (talk) 13:57, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The Chippewa is a different group than the Chipewyan. Dger (talk) 16:24, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chipewa is an Algonquin Language 

message: Does anyone have a more exact location for Neon Springs?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.148.15.74 (talk) 02:02, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neon Springs 
Talk:Pukaskwa National Park

message: Looking on-line, I see a conflict of information on the year Pukaskwa National Park was established.  Some say 1971, others say 1978, yet others say 1983... and currently the article says 1983 but the info box says 1978!  So, which of the three are the correct year? CJLippert (talk) 23:48, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Established when? 

message: Can anyone add a pronunciation key? I've only seen "Pukaskwa" written and never heard it spoken. I have no idea how it's pronounced. Király-Seth (talk) 16:17, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation
Talk:Kouchibouguac National Park

message: I have added a picture of inside the park... but I am sure there is better out there, so I will leave the photo request tag. Observer31 21:18, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

message: — Assignment last updated by Nataliefong00 (talk) 04:20, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Applied Ecology
Talk:Prince Albert National Park

message: I have added and editted extensively.  More would be good! I am going to take some photos in the next month and put them on the article. I am thinking of a Waskesui townsite photo and maybe a scenic view. Fremte 16:30, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have assessed this as a Start Class, as it requires more cleanup and referecing to reach a B class. Cheers, CP 05:17, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: Can somebody translate Waskesiu?  TREKphiler hit me ♠  06:28, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Look at Waskesiu Lake. --Fremte (talk) 01:33, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I should have thought of that...  TREKphiler hit me ♠  04:02, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: What's in a name?
Talk:Egmont National Park

message: Hello, I remember reading that William Fox was the Premier responsible for creating Egmont National Park. 
I don't have time to look for it now, but it would perhaps add to the page. 
Wehikore  20:00, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: William Fox, Politician
Talk:Rakiura National Park

message: In South America there are several national parks located more southern than Rakiura National Park. Jespinos (talk) 18:20, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  World's southernmost national park 
Talk:Kahurangi National Park

message: As a reader of this page I was hoping to find some information on the history of the park. ie. How and why it became a national park. 
Does anyone know?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.104.67.121 (talk) 01:49, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This thesis does an excellent job of summarizing the history of the creation of the park. https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q112806329 Stitchbird2 (talk) 05:11, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: How and why it became a national park?

message: @Schwede66@Turnagra @Uninspired Username  I have just added a new section on Geography, but found this quite hard going. The area covered by the Kahurangi National Park is highly diverse, and this makes it difficult to know what to cover. So far, I have not found any source that provides in-depth coverage of the geography, so I have had to piece something together myself, based on my perception of notable areas. At present, the material I have prepared doesn't cover the Cobb Valley, or the Mount Owen area, and it also doesn't cover the remarkable Kahurangi coastline. Shall I carry on with the present model and write brief sections about those (providing I can find sources ?). I intend to carry on, and produce a separate section about Geology but this will also be a challenge - partly because the sources use technical terms that I sometimes struggle with. Any and all feedback about the article is welcome. Marshelec (talk) 08:11, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks @Marshelec. I looked it over and it reads well - if there are particular sources you want included feel free to tag me and I can try to help. Added a photo. Cheers Uninspired Username (talk) 05:21, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree that it's off to a great start - sorry for being a bit inactive after having set this up! I'll try and make some time later this week or the weekend to give it a proper read over and add some content. Turnagra (talk) 09:21, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geography section added 

message: There are a few non-English pages about features of the park, that could potentially be expanded into English language articles:
*Bohemia Cave (Q9176285)
*Kahurangi Point Lighthouse (Q15822438)
*Stormy Pot (Q17127568) --Prosperosity (talk) 06:19, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Potential new pages
Talk:Abel Tasman National Park

message: Is it appropriate to be linking to people's personal photo albums from their trips along the Coast Track?  For one thing, it's specific to a particular area of the park, but it also just seems to be setting a precedent for coming along and adding hundreds of links, because that's probably how many photo albums are likely to be out there. Izogi 19:08, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Linking to people's photo albums 
Talk:Tongariro National Park

message: The map does not actually show the park's location. GrahamBould 09:22, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Will put the map up for improvement. -HuBmaN!!!! 16:23, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Map

message: @Gertrude206. I have noted the section in this Tongariro National Park article that covers the Tongariro Power Scheme. I seek your opinion because of your extensive work on the article about the power scheme. My initial reaction is that this section should be removed entirely, because the power scheme is almost entirely built on land/rivers that are outside the boundary of the National Park.  It is not a feature of the park, and appears to have limited effect on the park. Given that there is already a separate article about the power scheme, and that it is not within the park, I can't see any justification for including a section (although it could possibly be included in the "See also" section). 
Referring to a rather old Tongariro National Park map in my possession (dated 1985 !), it seems that the only significant part of the Tongariro Power Scheme that lies within the boundaries of the National Park is the Tokaanu intake tunnel that runs underground roughly parallel and north of the saddle road between Lake Rotoaira and Tokaanu. The map indicates that the intake structure at Lake Rotoaira is apparently outside the boundary of the park, with only the tunnel itself lying beneath land within the National Park. Should we remove this section entirely ? What do you think ? Marshelec (talk) 07:12, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: @Marshelec I thought this section on the TPS was too detailed and am inclined to agree with you that the section should be deleted entirely. There could be a section in the Park article on the rivers saying that significant rivers like the Whanganui and Whangaehu rise in the Park. That would be the place to also note that a number of rivers rising in the Park contribute to the TPS even though the intake structures lie outside it. I can make a list of the rivers. --Gertrude206 (talk) 08:40, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

text: Looking at the Gazetteer you are right that the Tokaanu tunnel intake is outside the Park but most of the tunnel is in the Park. Perhaps that could be covered in a section of the article about this northern/separate bit of the Park, Pihanga and Lake Rotopounamu.--Gertrude206 (talk) 08:55, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coverage of Tongariro Power scheme in this article
Talk:Arthur's Pass National Park

message: Unless there is objection I will prune the "Park Safety" section as it has too much detail and vague warnings that could apply to other wilderness hiking areas. At some point perhaps it is worth restructuring by providing reference to notable disasters or unfortunate events that have happened in the park. @Marshelec@Turnagra@Schwede66 Cheers, Uninspired Username (talk) 18:07, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I think a lot of that content is good, but it would probably make sense to be incorporated into other aspects of the article rather than a disproportionately large park safety section. I'm seeing stuff about access, incidents, and geography at the very least. Turnagra (talk) 18:19, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I have found that this same content appears in Wikivoyage , and I consider that it is more suitable for that platform, because it is in the form of a travel guide. A link to Wikivoyage is already included in the External links of this article. I propose that there should be no section in this article titled "Park safety", and that the existing content should be mostly deleted. A list or brief description of notable incidents might be useful. Marshelec (talk) 18:29, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with that view, Marshelec. Schwede66 18:34, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reducing the "Park Safety" section