Template talk:Apple Inc.

message: This template doesn't look good enough. I'm sure we can do better. Peter S. 23:26, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: * What do you suggest? All company templates are similar, take a look at  and . This template serves its purpose, I don't see what's wrong with it. — Wackymacs 20:20, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

text: *:Thank you for allowing this opportunity as well as make an initial introduction (EDWII); let's also consider the ways  has embraced the brand as well as   I am interested in cherry picking a micro-dose of  pun intended! 108.72.244.117 (talk) 08:03, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

text: *::Not sure what your point is.  There is no template "Roku", nor is there a template "Paramount"; if the goal is to give examples of templates for corporations, the only ones that count are the ones that exist, namely "Netflix" and "Hulu". Guy Harris (talk) 08:55, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Appearance

message: On the apple website, there are two separate tabs alongside the "Mac" tab for "iPod/iTunes" and "iPhone".  Shouldn't they be separated from true accessories like mice and monitors here?
Yes. iPod and iPhone are definitely hardware and not just accessories. They are meant to be used by themselves, not to enhance something else.I moved them to their rightful place.75.168.31.51 (talk) 10:57, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  iPod and iPhone are accessories? 

message: Macintosh isn't the name of any of the current models that Apple makes. It's the name of the series. Why is it in the list of hardware?  75.168.31.51 (talk) 11:08, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Macintosh? 

message: Considering that Filemaker Inc. is a separate entity (albeit wholly owned by Apple), it doesn't make sense that their products are listed in the Apple template. 65.168.253.172 (talk) 16:00, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: FIlemaker Products

message: Remove Mark Papermaster from Executives.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/08/technology/08apple.html?_r=1
77.99.126.48 (talk) 12:13, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: , you're right ;) --WikiKiwi (askme) 14:42, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request from 77.99.126.48, 8 August 2010 

message: "Labor" to the more correct "Labour" 144.124.3.232 (talk) 14:38, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please be more specific about what needs to be changed. I could not find the word in the template. — Abhishek  Talk  16:21, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  Unnecessary and time wasting req. That's simply US vs. UK English language spelling. Plus article about US company, so majority spelling will be US En. (from a Brit. ;-) --Jimthing (talk) 02:26, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request from , 6 October 2011 

message: The criticism link should, as in Template:Microsoft Windows family, move to History and Outline right under the header. Right now it is buried in History under Related.
194.54.31.24 (talk) 11:48, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the  template.  Mdann52 (talk) 15:30, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request on 4 June 2012 

message: Should Beats Electronics (Beats Music) be listed under Subsidiaries or Acquisitions? It is currently listed under both, which shouldn't happen. Ollieinc (talk) 10:20, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: In my opinion Beats is both an acquisitions and a subsidiary. They should be listed in both places because both categories apply to them. This is notable because it is the only acquisition that Apple has made that is being kept separate from its main business. ~ PaulT+/C 20:14, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beats: subsidiary or acquisition? 

message: I noticed that back in 2012 a significant change was made to this template that removed all of the  templates. However, lists are no longer wrapping correctly. The bullets/list item delimiters ("·") should never begin a new line and should always be next to the list item to its left. Is this a bug? Is there a larger  discussion about this somewhere where I can catch up on the conversation? (Admittedly I've been away from editing Wikipedia for the past few years so a lot has changed since I last edited this page.) Thanks! ~ PaulT+/C 20:14, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: User:Psantora there is some discussion about this at Template talk:Navbox and in the archives of MediaWiki talk:Common.css.  basically, there is a way to have template:navbox automatically add nowrap to list items, but this the exact way to do this (or rather than parameter syntax) is still under discussion. Frietjes (talk) 16:34, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  nowrap and hlist not working correctly anymore 

message: I think it might make sense to re-order the sections of this navbox so that the founders, executives, and board members are at the very bottom of the template. When people think about Apple, invariably the first thing that comes to mind are their products, not the people that work(ed) there. Here is how it currently stands:
And here is what I'd like to change it to:
Does anyone have an issue with this change or an alternate suggestion? - PaulT+/C 17:08, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-order sections to have products and services at the top of the template? 

message: Add links to the original MacBook, as with Template:Apple hardware since 1998. 93.42.70.164 (talk) 13:36, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs)  01:23, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 9 November 2021 

message: The template is missing Alex Gorsky in the board of directors  --Poweruser (talk) 15:20, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alex Gorsky in the board