lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:M-group

message: In the original version of this article, a group was defined to be an M-group if "G/C_G(F(G)) is nilpotent".  I have found no sources backing up this claim, and many sources backing up the two definitions provided now.  I deleted the original definition as unsourced.  To demonstrate it is not just equivalent to a standard definition, here are some remarks.  I will call a group a VM-group if G/C_G(F(G)) is nilpotent.
Firstly "VM" and "monomial" are not equivalent, and only mildly related:
* There are monomial groups that are not VM: The symmetric group of order 24 is a monomial group, but the centralizer of its Fitting subgroup is K4 with quotient isomorphic to S3, so not nilpotent.
* There are VM-groups that are not monomial: The simple group A5 of order 60 is VM, but every monomial group is sovlable by Taketa's theorem (Isaacs 5.13).
* Every solvable VM-group is a monomial group (Isaacs 6.22 and 6.23 show that if N is an A-group and G/N is nilpotent, then G is a monomial group, and in a solvable group N=C_G(F(G)) is abelian).
Secondly, "VM" and "modular" are not equivalent:
* There are VM groups that are not modular: The dihedral group of order 8 and the nonabelian group of exponent p and order p^3 are both VM but not modular.  Since every nilpotent group is VM, this probably means the ideas are unrelated.
* There are modular groups that are not VM: extended Tarski monsters are modular, but not VM
* I believe every finite modular group is VM by Iwasawa's structure theorem.
At any rate, the VM definition appears to be unsourceable, but I left it here in case someone wants to give it a try. JackSchmidt (talk) 23:38, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Old definition
Talk:Sopje

message: I don't understand why an UNDO was done.  I had the article marked as inuse when changes were made.
:-JasonSpradlin82 (talk) 23:38, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: making major changes involving information from Croatian Gov't websites
Talk:1999 Istanbul bombings

message: I think this article needs to be split into two seperate ones. These are two different attacks and two different places. 
I have already created article for one Blue Market massacre
Mingus79 (talk) 09:04, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Two Seperate Articles
Talk:Rex T. Barber Veterans Memorial Bridge

message: I thought it was strange this isn't a "Veterans' Memorial Bridge", but apparently the law has it without an apostrophe: http://www.leg.state.or.us/03reg/measures/sjr1.dir/sjr0038.en.html Since the resolution passed through the watchful eyes of the office of the Legislative Counsel several times, I guess we can assume this isn't an error... Katr67 (talk) 20:47, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems to be common to drop the apostrophe for memorials, I guess with the rationale that the memorial was not built BY the veterans (implying possession) but TO the veterans; see also Vietnam Veterans Memorial and Oregon Vietnam Veterans Memorial (which the PP&R dept. calls the "Vietnam Veterans of Oregon Memorial," no doubt to get around the apostrophe). --Esprqii (talk) 21:06, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: *sigh* I guess that makes sense. But I suspect apostrophe's are just to hard too figure out... Katr67 (talk) 21:30, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I found it on Wikipedia! From Veterans Day "The holiday is commonly printed as Veteran's Day or Veterans' Day in calendars and advertisements. While these spellings are grammatically acceptable, the United States government has declared that the attributive (no apostrophe) rather than the possessive case is the official spelling." Katr67 (talk) 21:39, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apostrophe?
Template talk:FS EMUs and DMUs

message: re edit war eg  , this subject has also been raised at WP:ANI eg 
Frecciarossa 1000 or "ETR 1000" is a confirmed high speed train, which has had contract signed for its construction, and is officially documented on FS's own pages.
Train navigation templates are not restricted to vehicles currently in service - eg in Wikipedia:Navigation templates it states A navigation template is a grouping of links used in multiple related articles to facilitate navigation between those articles - the main requirement is that the linked articles are related - ie form a topic of reading around the templates description. The new train is a good example of a very closely related topic.Oranjblud (talk) 13:38, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Frecciarossa 1000 - edit warring
Talk:Political line

message: I agree with this deffinition although it seems to have a underlying political agenda.  With no statistical reference (as seen here) one could make the exact same statement about the liberal echo chamber being larger due to proliferation of liberal journals, columns etc. 134.117.171.137 (talk) 23:44, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Think it should be "merged" into Party line (politics), probably just emphasizing the Marxist usage for "political line". StrayBolt (talk) 03:58, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  Klbrain (talk) 12:58, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
Talk:FS Class E.491 and E.492

message: I recently heard that some E491/492 were still at Foligno rail yard. The E492.004 was tested unsuccessfully in Serbia and the class was not sold.
Does anyone have further sources about the fate of these locomotives (more recent than 2008)? --Tobias b köhler (talk) 18:58, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Really sold to Serbia?
Talk:Mary McCarthy (fiction writer)

message: Good ref.from Time, found in Worldcat. 
Normally, being translated into multiple langs. shows notability. DGG (talk) 05:25, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I wasn't disputing that she had written the books. However, when you filter out the other "Mary McCarthy's", there is virtually nothing on this author. Generally there will be a decent bio by a publisher somewhere. Your ref above is minimal. Keep it but it is weak! Cheers! --Stormbay (talk) 16:19, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: By the second page of the quote link I started to realize that many,if not all, were from the American writer Mary McCarthy (1912-1989), not the subject of the page.68.178.50.46 (talk) 03:32, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong Mary
Talk:Lionheart (video game)

message: The article Lionheart_(game) redirects here athough there is a board game of the same name.  I am unfamiliar with said board game and I don't know if it is related or not, someone should look into this perhaps? 208.3.91.194 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 15:32, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: LionHeart the Board Game
Talk:Le Misanthrope

message: There is an error in the plot summary: Célimène does NOT agree to marry Alceste in the end.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.52.24.125 (talk) 10:03, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The above comment is erroneous. She tentatively agrees to marry him, but refuses to leave society with him, which prompts him to retract his proposal. 128.54.250.40 (talk) 05:15, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Goodnight123

message: User:Goodnight123
    run at Wed Feb 13 00:15:10 2008 GMT
Image:                 1
Mainspace              16
Talk:                  1
User:                  1
Wikipedia:             3
avg edits per page     1.83
earliest               03:27, 21 November 2007
number of unique pages 12
total                  22
2007/11  2
2007/12  3
2008/1   13
2008/2   4
(green denotes edits with an edit summary (even an automatic one), red denotes
edits without an edit summary)
   Mainspace
9 Keith Hogan
2 Scott Aldred
             Wikipedia:
2 Requests for adminship/Goodnight123
If there were any problems, please email Interiot or post at User talk:Interiot
.
Based directly on these URLs: [1]
* The edit count was retrieved from this link at 00:15, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit count for Goodnight123
Talk:Prince Konrad of Bavaria

message: Would Prince Konrad be considered a pretender to the Greek throne as the son of Prince Leopold of Bavaria and since his older brother Georg, didn't leave any heirs? --Kimontalk 22:48, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pretender to the Greek throne? 
Talk:University of London Officers Training Corps

message: This article is a virtual copy of Officers Training Corps as at . MickMacNee (talk) 00:24, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed the speedy, the article issue is one of duplication, not assertion. The other article has existed for years. MickMacNee (talk) 00:33, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed speedy deletion
File talk:Literacy.PNG

message: I might be alone, but I can't interpret this map. I can't find recognisable shapes such as Great Britain, The USA, Italy, Africa, India or Africa. Have I missed something? DavidFarmbrough (talk) 00:25, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: OK Just found Spain! So it's not a worldmap, just the middle of it. DavidFarmbrough (talk) 00:29, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Qamanirjuaq Lake

message: Ahimaa cave whereabouts
Is this cave definitely on Kaminouriak? I'm familiar with the lake, and as far as I can remember its shoreline is all very low-lying.  Does this article mistakenly refer to the cave on Kaminak lake? The reference link appears to be broken. 74.127.207.207 (talk) 03:51, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Markinch, Saskatchewan

message: (Cocopie (talk) 00:32, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Ena (album)

message: ying ping likes chicken wing,very nice with egg fried rice dont be angry be mellow your skin is very yellow. 
nadia uga uga. where is my spear..  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Reesmurray25 (talk • contribs) 11:46, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Violin Sonata in F major (Mendelssohn, 1838)

message: *Music clips
then I hope sheet music in internet.(IMSLP is not available while other sonatas.. ).
Makube Njalo (talk) 05:19, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: because it's not public domain under any interpretation, unlike the 1820 sonata which at least can be considered even in its 1977 (and first) publication a work-for-hire, or of course the op.4  sonata which is of course public domain, etc. This was first published in 1953 (with, to my knowledge, the needed copyright notice- if not, then maybe it's ok after all- in the US only) in an edition (the sticking point being the editor, Yehudi Menuhin, who discovered the work (among Mendelssohn's papers? in a library? I don't know, actually...) and who died too recently for Canadian or European copyright law to just ignore that and who wasn't performing work-for-hire.) The first edition I think was   (and incidentally gives the completion date of the sonata as 15 June 1838.) We do try to be somewhat careful about copyright over on IMSLP, esp. since we've already closed for 2 years because of a dispute you may recall. (I'm an admin there, though not a copyright-admin.) Schissel | Sound the Note! 10:20, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: IMSLP

message: I heard that this work was brought to attention by Yehudi Menuhin. Are there any sources that confirm this? Wikispaghetti (talk) 19:38, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: for one. "Discovered and edited by Yehudi Menuhin". Will look for others. Schissel | Sound the Note! 03:37, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestion: Menuhin
Talk:Touring car

message: The Winton is not a good example for a Touring car as these body styles usually placed at least 5 passengers (large up to seven). I don't know from where the designation for this Winton comes but to me it looks like a runbout or roadster. --Chief tin cloud (talk) 10:38, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Winton picture

message: Sincerely, SamBlob (talk) 02:09, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copied from [[Tourer]] 

message: Listed below are possible sources of information for this article, especially the vast uncited parts related to the Ford Model T:
*Model T Ford Production
*The Death of the Model T: Smooth Roads, Closed Cars, and Technological Maladaption;
Sincerely, SamBlob (talk) 04:15, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible new sources of information  

message: I accidentally saved this edit before writing an edit summary.  Basically, I rearranged the article, adding data from Torpedo (car) and adding new thumbnails. Sincerely, SamBlob (talk) 16:52, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing edit summary 

message: I have found a source for the two-seat tourer.  Unfortunately, I have found no reference to a year or an author, although it seems to be inter-war, which means it wouldn't have an ISBN, either:
*
I will keep looking.
Even so, the wider scope of the British term "tourer" is likely to be explained adequately in a section in this article, thereby not needing two articles to cover the concept. 
Sincerely, SamBlob (talk) 10:23, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Two-seat tourer

message: Reference the discussion above at Partial merger proposal.
The photo with the caption "from NY Public Library Cadillac European Touring..", is not a touring car. The car is actually a Cadillac 1925 Type V-63 Custom Suburban for Seven Passengers.  See page 100 of the book 80 Years of Calillac LaSalle by Walter M.P. McCall for photos correctly identifying this car. The photos in the book were taken of this exact same car at the same location. To my knowledge, there was not a Cadillac model with the name "European Touring" in this time period.
Many of the photos that were posted from the NY Public Library collection are misidentified, and they are easily proven as such.  In some cases an incorrect year has been written on the front of the photo, and other photos show incorrect model names, series, or other details. As I come across these incorrectly identified photos I update these photo names and their photo descriptions.  While renaming the photo I saw this talk page linked to the photo, and I thought you would like to know the correct model for the vehicle.
The photo in the gallery above has been correctly renamed. Zcarstvnz (talk) 11:02, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Courtesy Information 

message: Why this change of usage of tourer? Eddaido (talk) 07:02, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: There was no intention to change the usage, apologies if this accidentally occurred during the copy editing. Thanks for adding the reference. Cheers, 1292simon (talk) 11:18, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  UK?
Talk:Boris Shpilevsky

message: According to this article, he won 2006 Giro del Friuli
According to Giro del Friuli, there was no race in 2006
66.65.72.254 (talk) 01:23, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Good spot! It seems Shpilevsky won the Giro del Friuli Venezia Giulia rather than the Giro del Friuli. Helpful that the race organisers found different names for these two races! SeveroTC 07:42, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Giro del Friuli on 2006
Talk:Katrine Fruelund

message: I've added a good bit of information to the article, primarily about Fruelund's political career. How much information does it take for an article to not be considered a stub? Fregerslev (talk) 14:11, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a stub?
Template talk:Maryland parks

message: This template mostly duplicates the function of the preexisting template Template:Protected Areas of Maryland in terms of National Park Services locations and Maryland state parks.  The existing template also follows a format found in a large number of other states for navigating through federal and state protected areas.  There also seems to be no logic as to what local/municipal parks are included in the template, as there are certainly more than the handful listed.  I feel this template should probably be deleted due to these issues and the page redirected to Template:Protected Areas of Maryland.  VerruckteDan (talk) 01:34, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I merged the Template:Protected Areas of Maryland into this one. Sebwite (talk) 02:13, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, you used large portions of the "Protected Areas" template as a base for this template, but that is not merging them.  There doesn't appear to be a compelling reason to duplicate the function of the "Protected Areas" template.  There is no need for both to exist and since "Protected Areas" is the long established navbox, this new one should either be deleted or reworked into a navbox that does not duplicate the existing template.  If the desire is to have a navbox for municipal parks, I'd think it would be better to make such navboxes at a smaller scale, like a county instead of statewide, for example Template:Parks of Howard County, Maryland.  The question then becomes, is there a need for articles on each and every municipal park and do they meet notability guidelines of Wikipedia.  VerruckteDan (talk) 05:35, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Only a small number of municipal and private parks are notable, and those are the only ones I listed on the template. They all compose a single line each. It is on this basis that I feel that it is worth including them on the same template as the protected areas. On the other hand, the already existing protected areas template has some sections with 100% red links. It this links cannot be converted to blue, I would suggest deleting these sections. Had I noticed the "Protected areas" template already existed, I would have simply expanded it to include these smaller parks and deleted the full red-link sections rather than creating a new template.Sebwite (talk) 15:02, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Duplicating function of existing template
File talk:Hurstville station 3.JPG

message: This picture is out of date, but until Hurstville Central is completed, a new puc should be taken, with a caption like "Hurstville station at the start of refurbishment in early 2008" or something similar. 203.98.91.7 (talk) 01:39, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Update needed
Talk:Street children in the Philippines

message: I have checked out some of the sources and so far they are looking like material is cut and pasted from them... and there are some NPOV issues, I will begin to rewrite for the NPOV, and help would be apprecited. Hohohahaha (talk) 17:42, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  originality of the text, and NPOV issues 

message: It is given as refernce to many fact statements in the text, but the link doesn't lead anywhere. Other references will have to be added. Thanks Maysara (talk) 20:18, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem with Ref. no. 7 

message: Statistics from the late 1990s and many undated statements. Several dead links. I've just deleted one section that was a copyvio (found using the Wayback machine on one of the dead links). I suspect that several others are too: the "problems" section reads like newspaper clippings and the "NGOs" section reads like brochure/advert clippings. This needs shredding and new, up-to-date research. --Stfg (talk) 19:39, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article needs rewrite 

message: The NGO responses section is currently a list of what appears to be mostly non-notable organizations. A number of them are cited with first-party sources. Wikipedia is not a business directory and we should only be mentioning notable organizations that are active in the region (We can't possibly list every business in the world). —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 01:22, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section filled with seemingly non-notable organizations
Talk:Vai (Crete)

message: The previous write up, known far and wide, is identical with that of many sites. As far as I can make out, the sites, some quite well-known, copied WP word-for-word. We reached the disgusting point on one previous article where I was suspected of copying THEM. I nearly quit. I had one famous axe-administer trying to lure me into a confession. It was cleared up after years went by. They copied ME. In any case there is going to be no question here. The original write-up is in the travellogue style: hyperbole, irrelevant comments, advertising slogans, a style discouraged by WP for its articles. Moreover it refers to a "good-old hippy" time of free camping in the forest, beach nudity, and just generally making a stinking mess of the free beach in Crete. That time was nearly 50 years ago. We need to get rid of that write-up. I am working it. The up-to-date write-up is going to cover three discernable topics, the forest, the beach, the archaeological site, all under the name of Vai. So, I felt that 3 different infoboxes were required to cover them. I envision these to be short. I will be deleting much of the long lists of parameters. These can be long or short topics. If the article turns out to be not that long, I think they can all be kept in this article. If any starts to be longer the topic can be broken out into a different article. The pictures right now are in a single area. If a topic is broken out the pictures can be broken out also. Ciao.Botteville (talk) 09:44, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: rewrite
Talk:The Miracle Worker (play)

message: I have added more from Time's original review to give balance to this section, which had seemed to indicate a negative review.  While they did find some aspects of the play "clumsy," and "uneven" they went on to describe those scenes as "a needed contrast", providing balance to the more emotionally-charged scenes of struggle between teacher and pupil.
Contributingfactor (talk) 20:43, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Critical response 

message: This entire section needs to have a verifiable source added.  There is a comment that the information came from "ennotes dot com" but a correctly formatted and checkable source needs to be included here to assure that this information is not original research or directly lifted from another source.
Contributingfactor (talk) 13:34, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I deleted the copy that I had questioned immediately above after viewing enotes.com.  The information had been picked up word for word from that source.  
Contributingfactor (talk) 02:29, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Characters
Talk:Chino Hills

message: There is the city of Chino Hills, California and there is Chino Hills State Park, but I cannot find a citation referring to the geological formation as Chino Hills.  Is it possibly part of the Santa Ana Mountains instead?  I am just wondering if the actual hills are officially called something besides Chino Hills?  A reference to a scientific journal would be helpful.  Thanks, Alanraywiki (talk) 18:50, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is Chino Hills an actual mountain range?
Talk:Neptune and Triton

message: There are some considerable generalisations in this article which are not supported by references. In particular the references to the supposed sexual nature of the sculpture and the comments on its reception in the seventeenth century are lacking, and very much overstated. These have now been taken out — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xcia0069 (talk • contribs) 20:56, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion of sexuality

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  VernoWhitney (talk) 18:51, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed