Talk:Edwin Howard Armstrong

message: "Armstrong conducted the first large scale field tests of his FM radio technology on the 85th floor of RCA's (Radio Corporation of America) Empire State Building from May 1934 until October 1935." (emphasis added) — Is this correct? The RCA Building at Rockefeller Center isn't that tall, and I believe (but honestly, I'm not that sure) that RCA's connection with the Empire State Building was probably limited to leasing some floors, particularly upper floors for transmitter facilities.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.75.174.47 (talk) 22:00, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have been reading articles and biographies about Armstrong, but none of them except Wikipedia mention anything about the presentation given by Armstrong to FCC where he demonstrates the superiority of FM radios over AM. The reference given for this is an article from "Ogden Standard-examiner", which is not free access. Can somebody verify this or site a different reliable source that is easily accessible?
Caprika (talk) 17:31, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: FCC jazz presentation

message: The following reference doesn't seem to exist on IEEExplore?!?
"The Legacy of Edwin Howard Armstrong," by J. E. Brittain Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 79, no. 2, February 1991
Caprika (talk) 17:31, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect IEEE reference?

message: The only source I can find for his death date is Lessing, who gives it as Feb 1. Apparently he jumped during the night and his body was found in the morning, so it may not be known which date is correct. The TIME obit gives no date, and oddly enough there is no obit in the NYT, or at least Proquest doesn't have it indexed. Rees11 (talk) 03:00, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Death date again

message: The information provided on the section for FM Radio, have more to do with technical and political updates of FM technology, and less on his involvement in these. In here are more info contained about FM broadcasting in the United States than in the article itself. Would we consider moving the information there, and leaving a link behind, among the contribution of Armstrong himself?
--Radiobuzzer (talk) 15:52, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's important to give that information in this context; it was an important part of Armstrong's work. --Wtshymanski (talk) 14:31, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: "FM Radio" to be moved ?

message: footnotes 6 7 and 8 are expired links  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Captianjroot (talk • contribs) 18:36, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Footnotes

message: This article is incorrect in its claim about the invention of frequency modulation for broadcasting, because it was Abraham Esau who devolped FM and demontrated it before his students and the general public in Erfurt in 1930 and 1931.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.88.33.196 (talk • contribs) 
:Source?  Dicklyon (talk) 20:47, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Source:  And actually it was 1925, with the world-wide first "UKW"-broadcast between Jena and Kahla in Germany. Also, the article is not accurate on the european situation after WWII and FM´s success there. Mr. Armstrong may had his share in development, but he was nowhere an "inventor". 212.23.103.47 (talk) 01:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

text: actually that´s chauvinistic b/s.212.23.103.47 (talk) 01:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: NOBODY 'invented' FM - it's a concept. Audio researchers in the 19th century had studied FM in vibrating musical instrument strings; for at least 20 years prior to Armstrong's demonstration of FM radio, the patent journals of all advanced nations had been full of FM work - mainly work about PREVENTING unwanted FM effects in AM radio receivers (I can point you to a 1931 German (Telefunken) patent on exactly that). FM was initially consigned to irrelevance by 1920's Bell Labs work (the 'infinite sidebands' theory) - and, they were right - FM really WAS impractical/useless  at the (low) radio frequencies then in use. Armstrong's genius was recognising that FM WOULD work at the VHF frequencies subsequently developed by other radio engineers. In fact, Armstrong demonstrated a PHASE MODULATION system (rather than true FM) and it is other, later, patents (RCA, Westinghouse, EMI[GB]) on which modern FM radio is based. Glad to see Armstrong getting credit for the DEVELOPMENT of FM radio but, he didn't invent FM and he didn't invent modern FM radio either.31.49.28.120 (talk) 22:02, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: FM inventor

message: Tim Wu and most sources refer to her as "Marion MacInnis", but The New York Times referenced her as "Esther Marion Armstrong" in her obituary. ~ Fopam (talk) 03:45, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, the spelling of her maiden name is inconsistent in the article. Sometimes it is 'MacInnis' and other times it is 'McInnis'. Tweisbach (talk) 07:25, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wife's name 

message: I removed the following reference because I couldn't confirm its contents:
* 
It conflicts with an article by The New York Times, which states that the note concluded: "God keep you and Lord have mercy on my soul." ~ Fopam (talk) 04:28, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suicide note 

message: It seems somewhat odd to have the article at "Edwin Howard Armstrong", given that I can't think of anyone else of note named "Edwin Armstrong" that would have a Wikipedia article. Any thoughts? Bumm13 (talk) 09:26, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I actually came here to propose it be moved to "Edwin H. Armstrong".  That's what we have in the infobox and that's how he's most often known.  --  Jack of Oz [Talk] 08:39, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to "Edwin Armstrong"? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Edwin Howard Armstrong. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add  after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
*Attempted to fix sourcing for http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/search/wrapper.jsp?arnumber=1686149
*Attempted to fix sourcing for http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/search/wrapper.jsp?arnumber=1457239
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:31, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Edwin Howard Armstrong. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080515054100/http://www.fathom.com/seminars/10701020/session2.html to http://www.fathom.com/seminars/10701020/session2.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070825222458/http://www.nps.gov:80/nhl/DOE_dedesignations/Armstrong.htm to http://www.nps.gov/nhl/DOE_dedesignations/Armstrong.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:15, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Edwin Howard Armstrong. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nps.gov/nhl/DOE_dedesignations/Armstrong.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080509070320/http://world.std.com/~jlr/doom/armstrng.htm to http://world.std.com/~jlr/doom/armstrng.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070105222446/http://www.ee.columbia.edu/misc-pages/armstrong_main.html?mode=interactive to http://www.ee.columbia.edu/misc-pages/armstrong_main.html?mode=interactive
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:27, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: So every time this guy is mentioned in an article about being the inventor of superheterodyne receivers it always mentions how this Levy guy won a patent lawsuit against him, yet asserts that Armstrong is the inventor. Why is this Levy guy so special that he gets brought up all the time?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by HBBorges (talk • contribs) 03:08, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: This topic is covered in detail in "Who Invented the Superheterodyne?" by Alan Douglas. In short, while it can be argued that Armstrong did the most to make the superheterodyne receiver a mass-market commercial product, in the United States it was ruled that Lucien Lévy deserved credit for patenting the basic principle underlying the operation of the superheterodyne circuit.Thomas H. White (talk) 21:23, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Superheterodyne? 

message: … this horrid paragraph. The syntax is dreadful.
‘ Although Lee de Forest initially discounted Armstrong's findings, beginning in 1915 de Forest filed a series of competing patent applications that largely copied Armstrong's claims, now stating that he had discovered regeneration first, based on August 6, 1912 notebook entry, while working for the Federal Telegraph company, prior to the January 31, 1913 date recognized for Armstrong.’ 2001:44B8:3102:BB00:A1FC:5749:9DD:9F40 (talk) 07:15, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please fix…