Wikipedia talk:Tambayan Philippines/Archive 11

message: I tried looking for Alcala street on the Manila map. Does anyone know in which district it could be? Perhaps it doesn't exist now, but it existed in 1906 (from a birth certificate). --Chris S. 05:00, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe it doesn't exist anymore or its name has been changed. --Howard the Duck 05:10, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Calle Alcala was just north of Plaza Santa Cruz, running from what was then Calle Enrile to Estero Cegado.  Its continuation towards Quiapo was Calle Raon, and some time after 1906 that name was given to the whole street.  Later it was again renamed as G(onzalo) Puyat.Jim Richardson 20:39, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I know this street (Gonzalo Puyat), it has a pedestrian overpass on its intersection at Quezon Blvd. at Quiapo. It's at the left side of Raon electronics store. --Howard the Duck 03:00, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Calle Alcala is shown on the Manila street map included in United States, Bureau of Insular Affairs, A pronouncing gazetteer and geographical dictionary of the Philippine Islands (Washington: United States Government Printing Office, 1902), and its renaming as Calle Raon is recorded in Manila directories of the American period such as Rosenstock’s.   I just used Google to pick up its later renaming to Gonzalo Puyat.  I think the whole of Calle Alcala would have been in Santa Cruz, though I’m not exactly sure where Santa Cruz ended and Quiapo began.Jim Richardson 18:39, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alcala street? 

message: I am not sure whether it already exists, but it might be a nice idea to set up a project to create articles about dates and years with Philippine related topics. What I mean: Perhaps it is nice to create pages like 12 June, but then only for Philippine events, births, deaths, holidays etc, for example 12 June in the Philippines. The same for year pages like 1898. It would then be possible to link to these pages from Philippine related articles in stead of the general date or year links. Magalhães 12:32, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Err, is this timeline what you have in mind?--Jondel 12:48, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Why is the graph in reverse order? — Sandtiger 13:00, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Oh I see. Is this a precedent? Do they have this for other countries? It might be appropriate for very significant days but not for let's say an obscure councilman's birthday,etc.--Jondel 13:10, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think, instead of starting 366 new articles, it would be better to just add more Philippine-related information to the existing date articles. TheCoffee 13:21, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: How about 2003 in the Philippines, all the way up to 1521 in the Philippines? That'll be nice. Or maybe adding more dates in this page. --Howard the Duck 13:30, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Oh, I did not know that some year pages already existed. That's nice! Let's make more of them. I feel that there might also be a place for dedicated date articles for the Philippines. The disadvantage of adding all the info to the existing date articles would be that there will be way too much information and information you are not looking for. An advantage of special Philippine date pages would be that you can add information about locally famous people more easily than on the general page. I had this idea when I was reading a review of the Philippine-related articles on the Dutch Wikipedia in a magazine. One of the comments was that the links to dates and years led to arcticles with information which was mostly about other parts of the world. Magalhães 13:47, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I was planning to make a "On this week" section at Philippines portal, but if time comes each day has more than 5 events, it can be made into a "On this day" section, then I'll split that page into monthly summaries. --Howard the Duck 13:50, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

text: That might be another good option. The only disadvantage is that you can not link it in a normal article when using a date somewhere. Magalhães 14:38, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  idea 

message: Here he goes again...I'm currently exchanging emails with 'the Manolo Quezon III, and it looks like I have found something (and, I guarantee, the information I got from MLQ3 is very, very interesting). Once my correspondence is finish, I'll let you on in (and e-mail the others as well). Thanks --- Tito Pao 04:25, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What can I say is... Happy Birthday J.P. Rizal! on June 19. --Exec8 04:49, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Heheheh...LoL, you didn't wikify that one, so I did it ;-) --- Tito Pao 04:58, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Ok, what needs to be dealt with? User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 08:20, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll leave my comments on your talk page then. Please hang on for a moment. Thanks! --- Tito Pao 08:27, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: People here have a very liberal (to put it mildly) understanding of what the WP:NPA policy is for. --Howard the Duck 08:45, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not again? 

message: I wish he or she would just talk about the deletions (clean-up according to him/her) first...
See the history page:
* (cur) (last)  09:16, 12 June 2007 58.106.133.177 (Talk) (12,145 bytes) (I clean this up for valid reasons, pls. do not mess it up again! O.k. have some common sense for godness sakes. Why does'nt people ever used common knowledge and facts. It's very simple.) 
* (cur) (last)  09:10, 12 June 2007 58.106.133.177 (Talk) (12,143 bytes) (added expand category. This article does not need to many bullshit statements such as redirect article:See Visayan language blaa blaa. related ethnic groups blaa blaa. Keep it simple.) 
* (cur) (last)  09:02, 12 June 2007 58.106.133.177 (Talk) (12,114 bytes) (What happen to this article? It was cleaned up for valid reasons. Now it's all messed up again. Do not be an idiot Chris Sundita. Your revert actions seems biased. What's wrong with you?) 
* (cur) (last)  04:39, 12 June 2007 Nino Gonzales (Talk | contribs) (14,385 bytes) (the anon made some deletions which lessened the quality of the article, i think.) 
* (cur) (last)  00:43, 12 June 2007 Christopher Sundita (Talk | contribs) m (12,128 bytes) (Undid revision 137423652 by 58.106.130.158 (talk)) 
I don't usually pick on people's grammar, but this guy is really acting like a jerk. Guys, please help in keeping the article jerk free. --Nino Gonzales 05:07, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The dab note at the top is incredibly long. Either Bisaya becomes a dab page, or someone creates Bisaya (disambiguation). --Howard the Duck 05:46, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anon with bad grammar is deleting a lot of info from the [[Visayans]] article 

message: It seems that there are new cities, but I couldn't verify them. Either the plebiscite is not yet held or the plebiscite was finished. --Howard the Duck 16:17, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Based on what I see, all the new cities have conducted their plebiscites (Bogo, San Juan (Metro Manila), Catbalogan, Meycauayan).  Carcar, Cebu will have its plebiscite on June 23.  --Sky Harbor 22:24, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The NSCB website updates quarterly, it's almost the end of June, then we'll know what are the changes in our LGU. The latest I think is the merging of two barangays in Tagaytay City. --Scorpion prinz (Talk | contribs) 02:59, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New cities 

message: Hi I just obtained my birth certificate and found out all about the interesting 'factory' that I was produced from. Hehe, I believe the paanakan deserves a nice article here--Lenticel (talk) 03:26, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I saw this on the news last new year and the place is really affordable. --Howard the Duck 03:50, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This can be a potential DYK if only it can be made longer. --Howard the Duck 03:51, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Something like "DYK...that about one out of five babies born in Metro Manila were delivered at  Dr. Jose Fabella Hospital?". Need to rewrite that, though, to accommodate the "baby factory" tag, it's a plus IMO. --- Tito Pao 06:35, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Dr. Jose Fabella Memorial Hospital]] 

message: About getting something featured related to the Philippines...
I tried getting the kulintang article through last march. Basically, the only thing that stopped the article from going thru was a good copy edit. Suggestions were for me to place it at the Wikipedia:WikiProject League of Copyeditors/proofreading#Requests_for_FAC_and_FAR.
I did that three months ago and recently (6/19) they removed it because it failed FAC... waiting to be copyedited by the LOC for request for FAC ironically.
I believe this is the best chance for another Philippine-related FA article to make it but I see no reason for me to nominate it again if I can't get anyone at the LOC to look at it.
If anyone has some thoughts... go ahead... my patience with the LOC is wearing thin. I really have no time to wait months and months for nothing. PhilipDM 16:12, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You don't necessarily have to go to the LOC for copy-editing, and I'm a bit impatient myself with the Aviation WikiProject for not taking action on rating Iloilo International Airport as another example of WikiProject inaction.  Copy-editing does not necessarily have to emanate from the LOC; try asking other editors.  --Sky Harbor 04:33, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Kulintang]] Article DOA for a FA. Help. 

message: Hi guys, let's fill up this category. Para may kasama naman si Mang Ernie. Lenticel (talk) 03:54, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  <nowiki>[[Category:Filipino_inventors]]</nowiki> 

message: I was wondering where this could be placed: :Image:Ph Territorial Map.png, based on  and . --Scorpion prinz (Talk | contribs) 05:53, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably on Geography of the Philippines? -- Jojit fb 00:40, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Territorial map of the Philippines 

message: Project sub-pages in Wikipedia:Meetup for meet-ups in Manila are now available.  Please visit the main page - Wikipedia:Meetup/Manila.  A template was also made to consolidate all meet-ups in the Philippines (see Wikipedia:PhilWiki  Meetup Box).  In the future, there could be a page for Wikipedia:Meetup/Cebu. - Jojit fb 03:48, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Due to lack of interest by some of our wikipedians, I might drop plans to attend this meetup and devote time to some things else. --Exec8 09:04, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I left comments at the meetup talk page which may convinced you to think otherwise.  --Sky Harbor 14:09, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Getting [[meta:Wikimedia Philippines|WMPH]] moving further forward 

message: Guys could you help me with this article. Last time it was here it was speedy deleted due to notability but I'm pretty sure he is.--Lenticel (talk) 09:30, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Randy David]] 

message: After seeing Talk:City of San Fernando, Pampanga, isn't it a better idea to drop "City" altogether except for HUCs, ICCs, and cities named after their mother provinces and instead use the convention we use for municipalities, like instead of City of San Fernando, Pampanga and Malabon City, we use San Fernando, Pampanga and Malabon City, Metro Manila. The only cities which will be exempt are Manila and Quezon City. --Howard the Duck 05:22, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well we shouldn't be altering the way we do things just to conform to the way America does things. In the US any place that has a mayor is called a city, even if it just has 5 people. In the Philippines a place is called a city if it reaches certain requirements, and these places actually do appended the word "City" to their names. TheCoffee 05:42, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well for one thing, instead of the mouthful "City of San Fernando of Pampanga," many use the simpler "San Fernando, Pampanga." And leaving out the province's name may give the impression that the city is not a part of the province. --Howard the Duck 05:58, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I rather have HUCs without the name of the provinces theyre in. For ICCs and Component cities, maybe have the provinces. As for San Fernando, Pampanga, addresses in the city reflect City of San Fernando, Pampanga (it's their naming convention to distinguish it from the one in La Union. --Scorpion prinz (Talk | contribs) 08:15, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, but it still confusing. If you strip them of their provinces' names, you'd leave "City of San Fernando" and "San Fernando City", still confusing. You're right about HUCs and ICCs (that was part of my original proposal). For example, the name San Jose del Monte City implies that that place is not a part of Bulacan when it is. Ergo, rename it back to San Jose del Monte, Bulacan. --Howard the Duck 11:40, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming conventions for cities 

message: I have been searching for Philippine literature-related topics (tula, parabula, pabula, atbp.) but I only managed to get into forums wherein "resourceful" students were asking for the definitions and samples about the said topic. Can't we start a wikiproject for this? Also, important persons in Panitikang Pilipino should also be included. I also think it is better if we do Tagalog input for these then just have them translated to English. 
If this project pushes through, alas, all the Filipino assignments will say the same! hehe.
Bembenenot 22:37, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If you think this deserves a WikiProject, make sure you have enough people to make one first, then establish the project.  You can also try translating the articles on the Tagalog Wikipedia to English from Tagalog.  --Sky Harbor 03:13, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Philippine Literature 

message: Is there anyone here from Samar and/or who has access to published information about art techniques of that province? There's an AFD going on - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kut-kut - because, apart from one US-based artist, we can't find verification for the history (existence, even) of a traditional artform called kut-kut. Gordonofcartoon 02:47, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As I've mentioned in my follow-up comments in the AfD, Ate P doesn't think this is verifiable (she's from the Visayas). Any comments from our friends from the South? --- Tito Pao 07:44, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the input... I closed the discussion as delete. If somebody does come up with verifiable information, we can re-create the article. Sancho 21:55, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kut-kut 

message: The song got prodded but I believe it just need some refs. I manage to get some refs for it but the news articles are about Yoyoy's death and the song is just briefly mentioned so I discarded them. Okay, I'm familiar with the song but I'm not around yet when the song gave its full impact--Lenticel (talk) 04:20, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I just did. Ang hirap maghanap ng news article, puro blogs at lyrics database ang mga GHits sa Butse kik >=( --- Tito Pao 07:42, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Butse Kik]] 

message: There is a proposal to divide the province of Quezon into two: Quezon del Norte and Quezon del Sur. According to Quezon Representative Lorenzo “Erin” Tañada III, the proposed legislation had already been passed by the Senate and was only awaiting the signature of President Macapagal-Arroyo for it to become a law.
Under the propoasal, Quezon del Norte will be composed of Lucena City (as capital) and the following municipalities: Burdeos, Gen. Nakar, Infanta, Jomalig, Lukban, Mauban, Pagbilao, Patnanungan, Polillo, Real, Sampaloc, Tayabas, Candelaria, Dolores, San Antonio, Sariaya, Tiaong.
On the other hand, Quezon del Sur will be composed of the following towns Agdangan, Buenavista, Catanauan, General Luna, Macalelon, Mulanay, Padre Burgos, Pitogo, San Andres, San Francisco, San Narciso, Unisan, Alabat, Atimonan, Calauag, Guinyangan, Gumaca, Lopez, Perez, Plaridel, Quezon, and Tagkawayan.Angeles624 22:16, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A plebiscite must still be conducted to ratify it. President's signature isn't enough to put it into effect. --Scorpion prinz (Talk | contribs) 01:41, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Upcoming plebiscite in Luuk, Sulu to create a municipality of (i forgot) i came across it yesterday reading the PDI. Also plebiscite in Lapu-Lapu City for its conversion into an HUC. --Scorpion prinz (Talk | contribs) 01:55, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

text: Shouldn't come as a surprise. My hometown was converted into a city with less than 10 percent of the total number of registered voters (8,000+ voting "yes" as compared to the nearly 100,000 registered voters). --- Tito Pao 07:10, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Lol, amen to that. I didn't even know it was already a city until I saw it here. Shrumster 12:00, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to Divide the Province of [[Quezon]] 

message: Hello there.  There is a suggestion that the article Role of women in the Philippines be renamed as Women in the Philippines.  Please kindly participate in the discussion. This article was created from the WP:TAMBAY's requested articles list.  Thanks. Dragonbite 21:45, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Role of women in the Philippines]] article 

message: Hi. Please kindly place these within WP:TAMBAY's DYK appearance notice column:
#Lorenzo M. Tañada, DYK appearance: 14 July 2007
#Women in the Philippines, DYK appearance: 16 July 2007
These articles were created from WP:TAMBAY's requested articles. Thanks. Dragonbite 03:53, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Added the articles. However, I don't know how to input the dates next to them--Lenticel (talk) 06:36, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, Lenticel, for adding them to the WP:PINOY display box. Dragonbite 17:30, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Latest DYKs on Main Page 

message: Little help here. The article looks like an advert. I already cut up some of the problematic sections. --Lenticel (talk) 06:51, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Damn. Article was kinda acceptable last I looked at it which was...sometime early this year. Seems like a lot of the 122.xx ips have been bulking it with cruft. A lot of the article is now unencyclopedic, for example the lists of shops, movies, etc. I have no idea how to go about cleaning it up aside from a complete tear-down. Shrumster 18:37, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems like the 122.xx ips have been vandalizing the TriNoMa article. Sigh. Either employed by the SM people or just plain biased. This is just sick. Pinoys seem to just love taking sides and then bashing the other sides, as can be seen by what happens in the GMA-ABSCBN articles we have here. Just freaking sad. I'll see what I can do to clean up. Shrumster 18:59, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Cleaned up most of the article...kinda. :P Still a bit tinatamad to fix the attractions section. Shrumster 20:42, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[SM City North EDSA]] 

message: In the interest of more balance in the article text, I invite fellow editors to contribute details on paddy fields of the Philippines: technology, characteristics, history, culture, etc. Mumun 無文 14:49, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, if there are editors who can contribute more on the actual technology involved in wet-rice agriculture at Paddy field, that would be great.Mumun 無文 21:50, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Paddy field]] 

message: I encourage everybody to join discussions on Wikipedia talk:Meetup/Manila 2. Hint: My birthday is getting close...--Exec8 12:06, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Motivation for moving forward: Wikipilipinas (a.k.a. Wikipiniana) will debut at the 28th Manila International Book Fair on August 29-September 2, 2007.  Also, Wikimedia Philippines cannot move forward without this meetup.  --Sky Harbor 16:12, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I really wish I could.  But I'm miles and miles away right now. Dragonbite 23:29, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Why not set the meeting during and in the bookfare and get to meet the people behind Wikipilipinas (yehey, they changed tha name) as well. --Nino Gonzales 16:02, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

text: The book fair will be held at the World Trade Center Metro Manila Buendia cor. Macapagal Blvd., Pasay City near PICC. Do you want to meet during the fair? --Exec8 21:19, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

text: As long as it is a Sunday. PS Bring a bigger Wikipedia logo this time ;)--Lenticel (talk) 03:09, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

text: September 2 is a sunday. --Exec8 04:13, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

text: Sept. 2 is a good date. My shift might change by next week, but since I have more than enough time to prepare, I can find a way to get there. --- Tito Pao 04:22, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: September 2 is good, but when will Wikipilipinas debut?  --Sky Harbor 09:40, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll be busy doing events with Read or Die Philippines, New Worlds Alliance and The Philippine Order of Narnians at the book fair that day, but i certainly look forward to meeting everyone.Alternativity 18:39, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

text: We were offered by the Wikipilipinas people (and may I note by the Gus Vibal, founder of Filipiniana.net and Wikipilipinas) one of the World Trade Center conference rooms.  I think this might be a good thing for us, as we might be able to get Filipiniana.net's backing for WMPH.  Likewise, we can recognize each other as "equals".   --Sky Harbor 06:48, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I move that we meet up during the IBF. --seav 02:05, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I suppose we can.  Who can go?  --Sky Harbor 12:12, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Manila 2 : The Second Wiki Philippines Meetup 

message: :Just to summarize -
::The following have images:
:::*Nuno sa punso
:::*Tikbalang
:::*Manananggal (another one in-progress c/o Lenticel)
:::*Sirena
:::*Malakas and Maganda
:::*Kapre
:::*Bakunawa (Lenticel)
:::*Tiyanak (Lenticel)
:::: Let's list them here for sorting purposes. Thanks. - Dragonbite 00:21, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Images for [[Philippine mythical creatures]] update as of August 14, 2007

message: Just wondering, how often do you guys check the Tambayan? Quite likely that you check it much less than you check your email, right? Also, do you use feed readers/aggregators? I'm thinking of a way to provide an RSS/Atom feed of the history of the Tambayan and subpages. Then via FeedBurner, we can convert the feed into a email subscription list, if you don't use feed readers. Then to reduce the volume, the feed will only provide a daily summary item instead of items for each individual change. We can then do the same for the WikiMedia Philippine pages over at Meta. What do you think? This is so that every active participant can stay on top of happenings. --seav 02:25, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sorta mailing list mechanism for Filipino EN-Wikipedians and Filipino Wikimedians 

message: # How often do you check the Tambayan?
# How often do you check your primary emai?
# Do you use a newsreader/aggregator/feed reader? If yes, how often do you check it?
* 1) 3-4 times a week. 2) daily. 3) yes. daily. --seav 02:25, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: I'll try to set-up the email notification list and try it with you guys since everyone seems checks their emails daily. We'll first try it out on the Tambayan and so that we can jumpstart the various subpages for this "WikiProject." I'll inform you guys if set-up already. --seav 04:46, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Next steps

message: I think we should make it a priority to fix the Tambayan's assessment for importance and rating system. Shrumster 18:27, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Do we have an assessment guideline at all? I'm not familiar if there is one. All I know is the template. --seav 04:50, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Created the assessment page at Wikipedia:WikiProject Philippines/Assessment. I have no idea what I just did, but I hope the more template-savvy peeps among you can help bring it up to other Wikiproject's standards? Shrumster 10:39, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assesment protocols 

message: Could someone make a distribution map for the article? It is only found in Mindoro. Thanks--Lenticel (talk) 03:42, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You can use TheCoffee's blank RP map and shade Mindoro. --Howard the Duck 03:54, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Thanks Howard--Lenticel (talk) 05:26, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Tamaraw]] 

message: I'd like to make a simple locator map for Clark Air Base, but I don't know the boundaries of it within Angeles City.  Does anyone know how I could go about finding out? Thanks, --Chris S. 07:26, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm...how about loading it up on Google Earth, create a screenshot/save an image of the area. Then, import the image as one photoshop layer, trace the outline of the air base on another layer, then superimpose the layer (after discarding the non-free GE image) on a free image and merge/flatten? Shrumster 08:55, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's an idea, but that sounds like too much work. lol. Where did the municipal and city boundaries for the locator maps come from? Wasn't there a website?  Maybe I could look there first. I'll use your idea as a last resort. Thanks. --Chris S. 09:08, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Locator map for Clark 

message: I had the time to create this, I don't know where you can place it . --Scorpion prinz (Talk | contribs) 06:45, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Bravo! Looks awesome - much better than I could have ever done (I attempted it myself a while back). Thanks! :-) --Chris S. 08:20, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That should've took you the whole day hehehe --Howard the Duck 08:24, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clickable Philippine map 

message: Anyone have suggestions to replace the content there? Like new articles, photos and such. --Howard the Duck 13:07, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Why not make History of the Philippines the featured article?  --Sky Harbor 13:14, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I tried looking at the summary under "article milestones", after not finding it there, I found it immediately above that area. lol. Now we need DYKs. Those mythology articles can be enough for a mythologically-themed DYK. --Howard the Duck 13:17, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Portal:Philippines]] 

message: *I have created and proposed an infobox for Philippine mythology beings which is now at 
Wikipedia:List of infoboxes/Proposed Item no. 1.41. The template is at Template:Infobox Philippine mythology. I believe that's how it should be done, so it could be implemented? - Dragonbite 17:09, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Philippine mythology: Infobox and Navigational boxes 

message: August 19 is the Philippine National Day of the Language. Let us improve articles in native languages. Cebuano (37th) have 33,339 articles with 0 depth, 2 admins, 332 Users 106,238 edits and 289 images. Tagalog (85th) have 6,243 articles, 30 depth, 4 admins, 4,305 users, 115,010 edits and  897 images. --Exec8 06:24, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  National Language