lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Morning Ireland

message: Removed the following, in my view, possibly POV and in any case over-cryptic remarks: It must be said the programme was developed during a time when Ireland was a hub of enormous pirate illegal radio activity, when every move of the state broadcasting service, the only legal station in the country, was a move with the illegal stations very much in mind and hence there was a battle where programme titles often spoke louder than the programmes themselves. --Picapica 09:53, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 2006 post

message: Perhaps a short history of the show, it is the longest running in Ireland isn't it? Some of Ireland's formost journalists have been on it;David Hanly, Shane Kenny, Harry McGee...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Themont85 (talk • contribs) 02:08, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Here is a useful link. --candle•wicke 14:10, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This has now been added to the article. --candle•wicke 12:21, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: History
Talk:Prince Alfred of Great Britain

message: "Around 1796, Edward Jenner introduced inoculation, a novel method of smallpox immunisation... In 1782, Prince Alfred was inoculated against smallpox."
If inoculation was not introduced until 1796, how was Alfred inoculated 14 years earlier? The article contradicts itself here. If I understand the inoculation article correctly, Jenner did not introduce inoculation; he introduced an improved type of inoculation.
I think it would be better to remove the Jenner sentence altogether, as it refers to events 14 years later. For that matter, I don't see the point of the sentence about what happened 61 years earlier in 1721 either. So I suggest the first paragraph of "Death and Aftermath" should simply read:
"During the time of Prince Alfred, smallpox was a disease dreaded by royalty and commoners alike, and due to a lack of medical development, it was frequently fatal. Around 1796, Edward Jenner introduced inoculation, a novel method of smallpox immunisation. Queen Charlotte, Alfred's mother, was a lifelong advocate of inoculation, and she had the royal children undergo the procedure. Variolation, its precursor, was popularised in Britain when the daughters of King George II, then Prince of Wales, underwent the procedure in 1721." Adpete (talk) 02:41, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Given that another editor noticed the contradiction (see next section), I have removed the sentence about Jenner's inoculation. Adpete (talk) 09:22, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unclear on innoculation 

message: The text says that Jenner introduced inoculation in 1796 - I believe this is correct.
It then says Prince Alfred was inoculated in 1782 - fourteen years earlier. Was this a Jenner style inoculation or variolation, a much more dangerous procedure? The current text is not clear at all. 74.104.159.232 (talk) 03:34, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion about inoculation dates
Talk:Princess Amelia of Great Britain

message: *Move to Princess Amelia of Great Britain?: see Wikipedia:Requested moves Anthony Appleyard (talk) 09:18, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: See centralised discussion at the WikiProject DBD 09:26, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: Is this a picture of her? --AndreasPraefcke (talk) 12:46, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: Oh yes, I've been away and gathered sources etc. Now, let's do the Time Warp again! Join me, it's awfully lonely DBD 23:41, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move revisited
Talk:Prince Arthur of Connaught

message: You say 'Retired from active service (1 March 1922)'.
Are you sure this is correct? To my knowledge, officers over a certain age can be removed from the 'Active List', but still be employed in non-combatant functions. Or they retire from the service altogether, and become civilians. Valetude (talk) 19:48, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Retired from active service? 

message: Would he not have qualified for one or both of the South African Medals (Queen's, King's)  if he saw active service in the Boer War?Cloptonson (talk) 20:33, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Medals
Talk:Princess Augusta Sophia of the United Kingdom

message: The article jumps suddenly from the question of marriage to the end of her life. Did she marry? If so, whom? If not, why not? Did she do anything during that time? Jedikaiti (talk) 22:30, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, definitely a big gap, but I don't know any of the details.  Astronaut (talk) 20:19, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

text: We need citations before we can include anything in the article. Celia Homeford (talk) 15:06, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about the rest of her life?
Talk:Princess Augusta of Hesse-Kassel

message: possibly foolishly, I have re-opened the C-or-K naming dispute at Talk:William VIII, Landgrave of Hesse-Cassel#Proposed move (3). If you have a strong opinion either way as to whether we should use the C form or the K form in the articles in question, please express it there. — OwenBlacker (Talk) 09:28, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hesse-Cassel or Hesse-Kassel 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:William VIII, Landgrave of Hesse-Cassel which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RFC bot 09:30, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in process

message: As an inhabitant, I can state that the Castle of Rumpenheim is not situated in Kassel, but outside of Offenbach, south of the Main river. Please refer to the German Wikipedia Article on "Rumpenheimer Schloss".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.253.38.6 (talk) 14:11, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rumpenheim is not in Kassel
Talk:Albert's lyrebird

message: Hi everyone,
I noticed that the photos on this page are pretty dismal (hope I'm not stepping on any toes with this). I chanced upon this bird today and was able to get a great shot.  I'm not a Wikipedian and don't want to spend the time to learn the ropes, but if anybody is interested, I'd be happy to share the shot for use on this page.  Contact me at lothar (at) katz-us.com in that case. Lonkatz (talk) 09:59, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better photos
Talk:List of Sites of Special Scientific Interest in Somerset

message: I have started a discussion about converting the OSGB36 (OS grid refs) on this list and others to use :Template:Coord, as I think this offers advantages for users worldwide (who may be unfamiliar with the OS system) and the use of :Template:GeoGroupTemplate to enable mapping on googlemaps etc. I have been told that a bot could be tasked to do this, however this would be quite a significant change and would not want to do it without consensus. If anyone has any comments could they join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Geographical coordinates#Automagically converting OSGB36 to coord?.— Rod talk 16:15, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Converting OSGB36 (OS grid refs) to coords on this list and others 
Talk:Princess Beatrice of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha

message: I'm pretty sure that Beatrice would have been a Princess of Orléans, not a princess of "Orleans and Bourbon". Was she ever an Infanta of Spain? Charles 09:01, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Beatrice's husband was an Infante of Spain, and therefore (according to the rules at the time) she was an Infanta of Spain.  However, her husband is always known as the Infante Alfonso de Orleans y Borbon (where de Orleans y Borbon is his surname); this is perhaps a little analagous to the English usage "Princess Beatrice of York" (i.e. a common form, if not the official title). To suggest that she was ever called "Duchess of Galliera" (as at present in the article) is just silly.  Her husband may have had the ducal title, but he wasn't known by it. Noel S McFerran (talk) 15:07, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Titles

message: *Move to Princess Beatrice of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha?: see Wikipedia:Requested moves Anthony Appleyard (talk) 09:17, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: See centralised discussion at the WikiProject DBD 09:26, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: Who is Ena? Cutnyakdhien (talk) 19:43, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "who despised both Ena and Beatrice" 
Talk:Five Seven Live

message: Drivetime, as mentioned in the article, has now replaced Five Seven Live. Need to make corresponding changes here and start new Drivetime article. -- Picapica 10:14, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Drivetime 
Talk:Miklós Bánffy

message: The sentences on Versailles were a little POV, as were two assessing his works from a very subjective position (I quote from memory: "not as good a writer as Tolstoy or Lampedusa", "his world was gone"). On Versailles (and Trianon?), I attempted to use a tone that would be acceptable for both sides: if for some reason I have failed, please reformulate to something of that ilk that better suits the NPOV goal, and do not simply revert to the previous version (note that I have used the same approach when mentioning N.Transylvania further in the text). Dahn 10:16, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Two years later, in revenge for Bánffy's actions in Bucharest, Bonczhida was burned and looted by the retreating German army - what's the source for this? --Roamataa 14:17, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

text: There is absolutely nothing preventing anyone from adding it in both (both, because he actually had a sensible impact on the history of Romania - obviously not nearly as much as he meant for Hungary/Hungarians/Hungarian life). My guess is that the reason why he's not already in both is that the projects work independently, and one's existence preceded the other. Dahn (talk) 11:47, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Princess Caroline of Gloucester

message: I have merged the information on this article to the page on her father and also added information to the page of her mother. This article simply stated that she died of a smallpox vaccination at nine months and was styled HH rather than HRH. All information plus the reference is now at her father's article accordingly. Charles 05:43, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merged

message: Per the above, this page should be merged into her father's article. The material is duplicated, the content in this article can easily be explained and included in the other, and her father's article is short and needs expanding. DrKiernan (talk) 17:46, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Princess Charlotte of Clarence

message: I don't see an AFD discussion or any consensus on this talk page to merge or redirect the article to William IV of the United Kingdom, so I've restored it. Kafziel Talk 14:46, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't realize someone had unmerged this article. There was a discussion on her father's page (Talk:William IV of the United Kingdom/Archives/2020/June#merging) and a consensus to merge this article there. I'll redo the redirect. Tocharianne 12:42, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

text: I don't really see why she needs her own page. She lived for less than a day.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.66.230.44 (talk) 07:20, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Prince Edward, Duke of Kent and Strathearn

message: This guy did not "reign" anywhere.  English Royal Dukedom for King's younger sons does not involve any reigning anywhere.Eregli bob (talk) 06:19, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reign ?? 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Edward of Great Britain and Ireland and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 21#Edward of Great Britain and Ireland until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 05:32, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Edward of Great Britain and Ireland" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Top Gun (disambiguation)

message: This is pretty pointless. This page should be for the film, with a link to the school at the top of the article. All the other Top Gun pages/things are about the movie.
:I agree, this is stupid. Top Gun should be for the film...with a rationale at the top saying something like "This is about the film, see TOP GUN for the school. For other uses, see Top Gun (disambiguation)."...Top Gun (disambiguation) would be something similar to what this page is right now... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Krok20 (talk • contribs) 14:12, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Agreed, the school isn't even at "Top Gun," this should be reverted back. Epson291 (talk) 22:48, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Alexandrian Crusade

message: I was cleaning up the syntax and style of the "History" section and noticed factual discrepancies between the information given by the original author and the information in the main source that he cites. Specifically (as an example): the wikipedia author says that Peter I learned of an imminent Egyptian attack on Cyprus, and so launched a preemptive war--whereas the article's author writes that Peter was financing and recruiting for the express purpose of attacking Alexandria, Egypt.
Anybody have any insight?
--Malachirality 21:40, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Accuracy in question
Talk:Louis I, Prince of Condé

message: The Peace of Amboise is also being termed the Edict of Amboise. --Wetman 10:45, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Ainsworth's novel Admirable Crichton has one of the three daughters being captured when Louis fled from Noyers.  She was brought up by Catherine de Medici though allowed to remain Huguenot, and was one of Crichton's two love interests in the novel.  The novel is on Internet Archive for free.
71.163.117.143 (talk) 14:30, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  culture 

message: I understand that there is a more famous Conde but the fact his article already gives him the distinguishing name of 'grand conde' in its title, makes me wonder why we still have this (1530-1569) in the article title here, its unsightly. Sovietblobfish (talk) 20:04, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Name 

message: I think I am descended from him through a 1565 child named Gillaume or Gaspare, anyone know anything about this child? Berymtambta (talk) 21:19, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  1565 Child?   

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved Louis, Prince of Condé (1530–1569) →  Louis I, Prince of Condé
Louis, Prince of Condé (1668–1710) → Louis III, Prince of Condé; 
Henri, Prince of Condé (1588–1646)  → Henri I, Prince of Condé; 
Henri, Prince of Condé (1552–1588)  → Henri II, Prince of Condé.
As to whether to include "de Bourbon" in the titles, it is not used in :Category:Princes of Condé but occasionally is in :Category:House of Bourbon-Condé, so I'm inclined to leave it out.  No such user (talk) 12:17, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Louis, Prince of Condé (1530–1569) →  – Currently we have these unsightly brackets blotting the name of the article, this is entirely unnecessary as the other louis prince de condé articles simply use numerals to denote which louis they are about, this is a far more logical solution, one can only imagine how ridiculous it would be for wikipedia to name louis xiv 'louis, king of france (1638-1715)' as for the other components of the title I am proposing, de bourbon is his family name so it should feature in the title, I would regrettably settle for louis I, prince of condé if my proposal is intolerable in these regards Sovietblobfish (talk) 22:41, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

text: Support per nom Marcelus (talk) 22:42, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 7 January 2023
Talk:Iron Felix

message: Iron Felix is also a NSUN diplomat.
http://forums.jolt.co.uk/member.php?u=1042709
http://www.nationstates.net/cgi-bin/index.cgi/page=display_nation/nation=iron_felix
(Not really notable, but the NSUN diplomat does seem to be a fictional version of the Russian, his cite has a good pic). Mathiastck 10:50, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Flåvær

message: I gather it will be not very likely that english users will search for names with scandinavian characters due to the inconvenient entering of the letters. May be this stub should have more than one possibility for being hit, like Flaavaer, etc. --Frode Inge Helland 10:50, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Let us simply make sure it is well linked and tthen the English speaking users can find it! Williamborg (Bill) 02:43, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, Bill. Much better. --Frode Inge Helland 15:47, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Glasgow Academy

message: good alumni, old(ish) school. No pics more refs reqd e.g "one of the oldest" Victuallers 16:03, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: It is actually the 2nd oldest school in glasgow according to wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_the_oldest_schools_in_the_United_Kingdom 
The High School of Glasgow is the oldest dating to pre 1124 according to wikipedia  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.215.149.99 (talk) 18:32, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  School age/independence 

message: According to the Telegraph  he seems to have been educated here - and I think a famous alumnus such as Fraser shouldn't be left out of the list.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jackdelyelis (talk • contribs) 13:53, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  George Macdonald Fraser 

message: Hopefully someone will want to rewrite this after my copyright deletions, etc. Please use Wikipedia:WikiProject Schools/Article guidelines. The 'oldest' claim needs a third party source - see WP:RS. --Dougweller (talk) 16:54, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewriting this 

message: What about the schools history? There's some information on that on the schools own homepage. Especially its role during the War sounds interesting to me, but my language-skills aren't good enough, so I hope for someone else to contribute... --194.95.117.68 (talk) 15:11, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 
Talk:Hans Henning Atrott

message: THE GERMAN EVALUATION
I do not mind putting the text of the controversy to the archive. In only object that within a dispute the one party "evaluates" the conflict to the very favor of itself. For example, it is an unbiased and useful information that the Germans - already for more than a decade wanting to bring the English version of this article in a strict line with their defamatory one in their edition - are also strongly contested in their country. This is about a fact!  In addition, it is no insult to inform the readers whether the one that cannot be wrong is a PhD or a cigarettes seller. This is also no insult but a fact that can be verified. Everybody has to prove its competence.
Schinkelburg  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Schinkelburg (talk • contribs) 07:02, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

message: Hans Atrott rightly claims having become a "German" by "accident" since without the Germans' annexation of Lithuania Minor in 1938 he wouldn't be one. By the way, the Germans did not acknowledge people from this part of Lithuanian as German citizens, after WWII (from 1945 until 1950). Here, this sort of individuals (as "co-workers of German Wikipedia")  want to cover the anyway never ending shame of their country that a contemporary famous one exiled from their country.  The average German is used to imposing his will on others. He fools himself being the biggest, strongest, smartest and best.   It is not the problem, whether the Germans are still Nazis, today, but that the Nazis were genuine Germans...! The German screwballs rather should be banned from conquering "the world." A reader from Poland 5.172.188.58 (talk) 22:48, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: THE BOSSY GERMANS
Talk:Angel Heart (manga)

message: :The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was PAGE MOVED per request & discussion below. -GTBacchus(talk) 18:14, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Page move

message: :Add  * Support  or  * Oppose  on a new line followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.
*Support per the reasoning given. Dekimasu 07:14, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: I changed the number of volumes in the info box since ComicBunch released volume 21 this month, specifically on January 9th of 2007.
ComicBunch's comics list for Angel Heart \(^o^)/ 15:40, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New volume released by ComicBunch 

message: Isn't the anime only 50 episodes instead of 53?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ArtimusCF (talk • contribs) 13:37, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anime episode count?
Talk:Andean condor

message: "The Andean condor is a national symbol of Argentina, Bolivia, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, and Peru ..."
Seems that the list of countries that have the Andean condor as their national symbol is correct except for Argentina and Peru. Neither Argentina's nor Peru's flag, coat of arms nor national bird include the Andean condor: see 
National symbols of Argentina 
National symbols of Peru. 
National bird of Argentina is the rufous hornero and for Peru is the Andean cock-of-the-rock.
I suggest eliminating mention of both Argentina and Peru.--Daven brown (talk) 19:14, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  National symbol of Argentina and Peru is not Andean condor. 

message: My webpage link on the Wikipedia site as an External link for Andean condor was removed as it was determined to serve as a promotion of my own work, and however I felt that it would be in the interest of Wikipedia to have it there, I abide by the act.  I want to know if I would be in violation of the same terms if I posted the information on this Wikipedia page, Talk:Andean_condor?
I had edited this page on its population and status, and now I am finding that there is a different figure for its overall population.  I want to clarify the confusion.  The estimate is now believed to be 10,000, which is what I wrote on this page.  However, some websites give that figure as 6,700, which is actually the number of mature condors out of the total population itself; the writers behind this information have construed the lesser figure as the total, which is in error.  See this link, under "Population in detail."  https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/22697641/181325230 db-user  db-user (talk) 18:38, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: See WP:PROMO - do not post your own website to articles nor to talk pages. Blogs especially. - UtherSRG (talk) 00:37, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  My webpage link on Wikipedia, Andean condor.
Talk:Mindflayer (band)

message: I'm not very knowledgeable on Dungeons & Dragons, so if anyone else knows any D&D references (songs, albums, etc) please add to what I've been able to russle up.
Drewcifer3000 11:00, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled