Talk:Electric battery

message: For past discussions about this article, see the archives listed in the boxes above. Items that have not been active for a year or more have now been archived. --Wtshymanski (talk) 03:33, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Archive

message: change ((Other uses|Battery)) to ((Other uses|Battery (disambiguation)((!))Battery))
: Not done: the existing template syntax is fine as is, since the disambig page is simply Battery and not Battery (disambiguation), which just redirects back to the first title. Highway 89 (talk) 17:00, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: please see WP:INTDAB 2601:541:4500:1760:4C0C:6A13:1716:ADD6 (talk) 17:04, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

text: Done NiciVampireHeart 17:22, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Battery

message: No mention of the nickel-iron battery in the section? Someone brought it up in archived discussion but no one answered. MartinezMD (talk) 17:32, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rechargeable 

message: The ingestion section should mention that the more than 3V from common lithium cells is enough to generate dangerous chemical reactions in the digestive system.  The 1.5V of other cells mostly doesn't do that. Gah4 (talk) 01:02, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: A source would be helpful to use. MartinezMD (talk) 01:06, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Please refer to sources under Lithium_battery#Health_issues_on_ingestion and Button_cell#Accidental_ingestion for sources. Thomaszwilling (talk) 16:59, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  ingestion 

message: Mercury-Containing and Rechargeable Battery Management Act dead link 
active working link https://aussiebattery.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Mercury-Containing-and-Rechargeable-Battery-Management-Act.pdf Gandbatts (talk) 06:54, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Partly done: I've fixed the dead link, but it's better to use the actual EPA as the source so that's what I've done. Volteer1 (talk) 07:27, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 15 February 2021 

message: You had an add saying you need help with more about the history of the battery and I just recently watched an in depth documentary of this subject. I do not know if age is required but mine is twenty five. 24.223.97.191 (talk) 15:57, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Please provide the exact change you'd like to make, as well as sourcing for said changes. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:20, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 22 February 2022 

message: I added Citation that was requered in Comparison section and i removed the tag if there is any problem with sources we can discuss it Mina Farage  (talk) 12:00, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure. Some of Schmidt-Rohr's papers have been removed as references from this and and many other articles because they espouse fringe theories, were added by the author himself (in violation of WP:COI) and aren't very suitable--they're primary sources, and we'd prefer secondary ones. The statement in question is fairly obvious and well-known, and we really don't need to advertise a fringe paper as a source. IpseCustos (talk) 12:05, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citetion Request in Comparison Section 

message: I would just like to add, that: The dry cell battery was invented by a Danish industrialist, Frederik Louis Wilhelm Hellesen (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilhelm_Hellesen), in 1887. Parts of the company was later bought by Duracell, in 1986 (https://da.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hellesens). Razid1987 (talk) 20:30, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: A lot of problems with this from an edit request perspective. One, you need to provide the exact prose you would like per WP:EDITXY. Two, you need to state where you would like the prose. Three, Wikipedia (both the English and the Danish) are not reliable sources inherently. Neither article possesses sufficient citations to substantiate the claim you are making. —Sirdog (talk) 01:05, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 23 October 2022 

message: — Assignment last updated by MichaelNhy (talk) 23:56, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - FA22 - Sect 201 - Thu

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Sceptre (talk) 18:07, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: iT TAKES VERY LITTLE EFFORT.  aND YOU MADE A GOOD P[OINT AT Talk:Electric_battery#Where_is_the_discussion_for_moving_this_to_"Electric_Battery"?. 121.98.204.148 (talk) 02:08, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: See WP:POSTMOVE Constant314 (talk) 20:17, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

text: Oppose move. The current title is natural disambiguation. O.N.R. (talk) 01:56, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: hAVE YOU EVER ASKED FOR AND ELECTRIC BATTERY AT THE SHOPS? 121.98.204.148 (talk) 02:12, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

text: I have never heard the term "Electric battery" either.  I would think that it was more naturally a "chemical battery" such as "lithium battery", "lead acid battery". Constant314 (talk) 20:17, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Then why aren't you supporting moving it back like you did in 2018? Unlike the Fan discussion where there had only been discussions on primary usage not natural disambiguation there have been several for this, see Talk:Electric battery/Archive 3#Propose article rename to "Electrical battery" and Talk:Electric battery/Archive 2#Move for Electrochemical battery so it should probably be restored to the original Battery (electricity) rather than the proposed "Battery (electric)" as it doesn't seem there was consensus for the 2018 move. WP:NATURAL says "do not use obscure or made-up names" which the current title is quite clearly obscure if neither you or I have heard it when its an everyday noun. Crouch, Swale (talk)  21:25, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 25 December 2022