lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Strathfoyle

message: What is 'Strathfoyle' in Irish? I have tried to find out, but have found it difficult to pin down. Ryannus 20:02, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I still can't find it. Can anyone help? Ryannus (talk) 19:07, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I found it. Ryannus (talk) 19:32, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The Irish is a translation from the English, not vice versa. jnestorius(talk) 16:20, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Name in Irish??
Talk:Delivermail

message: I think that the article is not notable enough to warrant its own page, but instead should be incorporated in some kind of history section on the Sendmail page. I'm not sure if there isn't any way of obtaining a copy of delivermail and actually write a proper article on its mechanics, though. 212.117.96.140 (talk) 11:02, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd rather merge it with SMTP#History, which is missing a citation for the role that the passage from delivermail to sendmail played in the development of that protocol. However, a full article on the history of email might be a better idea.  Dave Crocker in this email recognized that Wikipedia is authoritative on this subject.  (The colleague he mentions is Carl S. Gutekunst, who pointed to Shiva Ayyadurai after the Washington Post's article on EMAIL invention.)  ale (talk) 08:50, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging with Sendmail
Talk:Good Luck! Ninomiya-kun

message: This is really unrelated, but doesn't Mayu's hairbands (or hairclips) looks like batman's symbol? 66.183.215.186 18:06, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Mayu's hairband

message: How many episodes are there going to be? - .:. Jigsy .:. (talk) 22:52, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Considering the low budget and low popularity of the anime, I'd guess it's only going to be running for 12 episodes or so. But it hasn't been confirmed yet I believe.--十八 00:52, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Episodes

message: I don't have the time or experience to take care of it, but could someone add the other characters to the list and type up things on them? i.e. Hinako and Irori.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.33.114.22 (talk) 03:18, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Characters 

message: *Mania.com: Ep 01
--KrebMarkt (talk) 19:25, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review(s) 

message: The whole series is about Triangle Love, as it's mainly about 1 boy and 2 girls. So why put it Harem?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jakeslogan (talk • contribs) 01:49, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Harem or Triangle Love?
Portal talk:Ancient Rome/Archive 1

message: My eyes hurt.  Badly.  That red colour really isn't very nice.  Could the Portal's creator please change it? G1ggy Talk/Contribs 08:04, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Any suggestions G1ggy. I just thought red was appropriate because it is so often used as the principal color of the Empire. --Tλε Rαnδom Eδιτor (ταlκ) 18:16, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Wasn't it more crimson or purple than the current shade? Regarding togas, see there and here.trespassers william 21:24, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, Random, red is kinda appropriate, but the current shade (at least when I left that message) wasn't making me happy...something a bit less in your face, if you know what I mean? Giggy UCP 09:50, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colour scheme 

message: The Portal is getting closer to completion. Questions, Comments, Concerns. --Tλε Rαnδom Eδιτor (ταlκ) 23:57, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think intros are more common in a wikified form. Maybe we should put the source text and wipe the refs off? trespassers william 21:27, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Complete 

message: Why on earth is this portal called "Roman Empire" and not "Ancient Rome". That would also encompass the Roman Republic and the Roman Kingdom. Seems very unatural to seperate the three, like it's now. - \mathrm{S}. \mathrm{Solberg} \mathrm{J}. 00:06, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Why not ''Ancient Rome'' portal?
Talk:Locking differential

message: So with AWD lock on every tire will spin at the same speed, right? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.250.209.39 (talk) 20:11, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, the average of the rear wheels will be the same as the average of the front wheels. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.241.129.245 (talk) 06:02, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wheel speed

message: "Steering difficulties can be mostly eliminated by selecting modern lockers which are better engineered than earlier versions which were notorious for steering difficulties." - I'm going to delete this statement because I don't think it's true.  Can anyone offer why they think this would be true?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.241.129.245 (talk) 06:02, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of problematic statement

message: Uberjeep actually quoted something from this website on his jeepforum account thinking it is fact when in reality you can pout whatever you want on here and it doesnt matter. Truthfully a detroit locker is a locker in a detroit sports locker room and has nothing at all to do with jeeps. —Preceding unsigned comment was added to the article itself by 138.162.8.57 (talk) in this edit. It was reverted as vandalism, but then moved here as essentially talk-page-worthy in nature, with the etiquette breach attributed to unfamiliarity with using Wikipedia rather than to vandalistic intent.
:Actually it would be useful to know more about the name "Detroit Locker". It seems like it probably began life as an OEM brand name for assemblies sold to the automakers. Apparently Eaton owns the brand now, according to eaton.com ("The legendary Detroit Locker began the revolution in performance differentials and still leads the industry today as an Eaton brand."). I always wondered if the "Detroit" in it originally came from the Detroit Diesel division being its maker. Or maybe just some other auto-parts maker acting as supplier to the Big Three. As for whether it was ever OEM equipment on Jeep brand vehicles, well, fill us in. If you have any solid info on it (which your comment implies you do), you should consider adding it to this article. It would be useful. I do know for sure that AMC (maker of Jeep for many years) bought OEM parts from many companies, including GM itself. But I don't know anything about Detroit Locker in particular. — ¾-10 01:06, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Argument about terms

message: The Detroit Locker was initially called a “Thornton NoSPIN Differential.” Ray Thornton patented it in 1941 as device for use in six wheel (tandem drive) truck applications. The NoSPIN was manufactured by the Detroit Automotive Product Corporation and was used on American military vehicles during World War II. ... In 2005, powertrain giant Eaton Corp. purchased Detroit Locker’s parent company and greatly expanded the offerings. https://www.onallcylinders.com/2013/12/19/detroit-locker-history-anatomy-faqs-toughest-differential-town/  Greglocock (talk) 23:36, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Detroit Locker - ancient history
Talk:Internal Troops of Ukraine

message: About passage that looked dubious to one of the editors: as far as I know, Ukrainian Internal Troops fulfill special mission in case if an official state of emergency () is declared in the country. According to the Law "On the state of emergency", the Troops establish headquarters of the emergency, maintain (or "fulfill"?) the regime and co-ordinate the efforts of other govt. institutions. And this is about state of emergency, not the state of WAR (when military are in charge). I'm not really sure if my knowledge is up-to-date, and I have no external links for all this right now, not to mention English links. That's why I decided to put the "dubious" template there for now.AlexPU 07:05, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Internal Troops in a state of emergency 
Talk:Los Angeles Contemporary Exhibitions

message: While an email list is probably not enough of a reliable source to be cited in a Wikipedia article LACE: A Brief History at least provides a framework for research into sources to help build this article.  Similar material is also available in press releases from LACE. Look around for actual articles (hard to find among the plethora of exhibit listings.) --Larrybob 20:28, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Greetings,
I was asked by friends at LACE to fill out their page.  I've submitted it to them for further edits; please consult with me before you take down any of our work.  This first revision of the page is based upon their Organizational Summary of 29 June 2006.  Thanks.  We would appreciate anyone who showed at LACE filling in the exhibition calendar...and especially fill out a page for yourself!Joel J. Rane 05:48, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Filled out the page
Talk:Company (TV program)

message: Should this TV production of the musical have its own page?  -- Ssilvers 14:13, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point. I do not think that this TV show should have a separate article, it is a taped/filmed version of the stage musical. There is nothing unique or notable about this TV show by itself. I added the "Merge to" template.JeanColumbia (talk) 14:21, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with musical?
Category talk:Members of the Legislative Council of Hong Kong

message: Should some of the articles be split off from this category, e.g., by years? We can have separate subcategories for :Category:Members of the Legislative Council of Hong Kong (1985-1988), (1988-91), (1991-95), (1995-97), (1997-98), (1998-2000), (2000-04), and (2004-08). 218.250.159.25 (talk) 19:25, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split
Talk:French catheter scale

message: I find the description very confusing. according to what is written here, the French scale gives the circumference and to get the diameter, one divides the French size by pi (3.14159 ...) . This does not agree with the conversion table given in the attached picture. The scaling factor is more like F = 3 * mm. Does anybody agree ?
* I agree, this is somewhat confusing. It's as though it was written by someone who either doesn't know the subject matter very well, or doesn't quite know how to write clearly. Perhaps this is a result of sloppy editing...?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.239.133.107 (talk) 17:25, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  very confusing 

message: *Merged --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:37, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: merger proposal

message: I cannot believe how hard it is to find the lumen (inner diameter) of these catheters and cannulas. The inner diameter determines the flow rate. 
What are the inner and outer diameters?
162.207.203.26 (talk) 17:50, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where's the inner diameter?
Talk:Gnome-Rhône Mistral Major

message: Bore and stroke given yield 38.67L (2360cuin), not the 38.72 (2363) shown. 162.157.229.90 (talk) 05:14, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: This engine may have articulated connecting rods, if it does we don't know the exact stroke of the articulated cylinders. For this reason (and others) we use the displacement from the cited source and not self-calculated figures. Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 21:17, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Displacement
Talk:PSD (Photoshop Document)

message: PSD is actually a pretty notable file type, if you want a comparable proprietary type, look at PDF.  Kwsn(Ni!) 20:43, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No shortage of file type pages - see :Category:Graphics_file_formats. just needs expanding. I've removed the speedy delete. Paulbrock 22:16, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Also the page is less than 24hrs old!! Give the author and other contributors a chance.. Paulbrock 22:20, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hope the author gets back to the article, because very new articles usually don't get many other contributors jumping in quick.  Useight 01:20, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Biodiversity Outcomes Framework

message: Hallo, I revised the tense of a paragraph.  Should I also revise the What Why and How sections into paragraph format so those words are not repeated so often?  Suggestions from the more experienced appreciated please ;)  Biological Diversity 20:51, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Neo-Kantianism

message: Neo-Kantianism
Do not merge Neo-Kantianism with Kantianisam.
it is always better to have more than one articles on the similar subject, since, for example, some people are interested only in Neo-Kantianism philosopy, and if they find it convenient they can always check out the Kantianism page. But if you are searching Neo-Kantianism only, you may expect to find it on special page, apart from other articles, and it may happen that you don't even remember to search Neo-Kantianism in the Kantianism page.
To conclude Neo-Kantianism should not merge with Kantianism.
Dusan Kovandzic
It is better not to merge it, Neo-Kantianism is an important philosophical school that should be treated on its own. Note that this article could use some revision and improvement.  Ehmhel 01:09, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, absolutely not. Removing the notice. Lycurgus 07:06, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Discussion begun April 2007

message: Though by no means supportive of all of Kant's ideas, he advocates the Kantian framework view of perception at a TED talks interview a year ago. Oliverbeatson (talk) 03:29, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Richard Dawkins

message: I put a  tag on the statement, "Lange and Cohen in particular were keen on this connection between Kantian thought and socialism leading Ludwig von Mises to view Kantian thought as pernicious. Other sources, (e.g., ), suggest that Mises was actually influenced by Kant, which would imply that he hardly saw Kantian thought as "pernicious", (though perhaps he saw certain interpretations of Kantian thought as pernicious). EPM (talk) 22:42, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Ludwig von Mises

message: The article claims that "The 'back to Kant' movement began in the 1860s, as a reaction to the materialist controversy in German thought in the 1850s."
I thought that the 'Back to Kant' movement was a reaction against German Idealism. After Kant had shown that proofs for the existence of God were not valid, the theological German Idealists (Fichte, Schelling, Hegel) were horrified and tried to re-instate God by naming Him the Absolute Universal Spirit [Geist]. Then they trivialized Kant by claiming that Kant's philosophy was simply a mere progressive historical stage or early phase on the way to their own philosophy. 'Back to Kant' was a movement that tried to nullify the transcendent metaphysics and theology of the German Idealists. Materialism was then a scientific reaction against German Idealism's unscientific philosophy of nature. Am I wrong?Lestrade (talk) 21:31, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Why back to Kant?
Talk:Camp Ramah in the Berkshires

message: See (and join) the discussion on the Camp Ramah talk page on this issue.  
Someone who has good reason for one form of transliteration over the other might make the appropriate change across all the Camp Ramah articles.  Right now they differ, and people are RVing each other (as on the Camp Ramah in California article page).  
Right now Camp Ramah publications use both forms of transliteration.  For example, eidah is used at , , and .  But edah is used at , , and .--Epeefleche 20:55, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Eidot or Edot?
Talk:Santo Stefano Island

message: Actually as far as I know most of the people quoted there were deported on Ventotene island and never where on Santo Stafano, I think : there was a barrack prison camp where the football ground of Ventotene now is. I am pretty sure about it as far as Spinelli and Rossi are concerned. 81.65.189.216 (talk) 18:51, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Camp Ramah in Wisconsin

message: See (and join) the discussion on the Camp Ramah talk page on this issue.  
Someone who has good reason for one form of transliteration over the other might make the appropriate change across all the Camp Ramah articles.  Right now they differ, and people are RVing each other (as on the Camp Ramah in California article page).  
Right now Camp Ramah publications use both forms of transliteration.  For example, eidah is used at , , and .  But edah is used at , , and .--Epeefleche 20:56, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Eidot or Edot?
Talk:Camp Ramah in New England

message: See (and join) the discussion on the Camp Ramah talk page on this issue.  
Someone who has good reason for one form of transliteration over the other might make the appropriate change across all the Camp Ramah articles.  Right now they differ, and people are RVing each other (as on the Camp Ramah in California article page).  
Right now Camp Ramah publications use both forms of transliteration.  For example, eidah is used at , , and .  But edah is used at , , and .--Epeefleche 20:57, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Eidot or Edot?

message: This page is almost entirely written like an advertisement for the camp. Plus, there is a lot of unencyclopedianic content, like the part about a counselor "notorious for smelling good." I think this article needs massive cleanup.Smartyshoe 12:09, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have taken another look at this page. Ed Gelb's section is very anti-him. It was obviously written by a camper. Smartyshoe 12:10, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree there was POV which was properly deleted.  I will look for other POV, and delete as appropriate.  There is nothing advertisement-like about the article, though.--Epeefleche 15:46, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Took out POV material -- including the smelling good reference, which though mentioned above was not deleted.--Epeefleche 15:59, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV/Ad 
Talk:Flexion test

message: I am a UW student working on a English class project to contribute to a Wikipedia article.  I hope to help this page by adding content and sources including a discussion on gait evaluation and grading lameness as they relate to flexion tests.  I would also like to further explain what happens after a nerve block if subsequent flexion tests are performed and what the results might indicate.  I also think it would be worthwhile to talk more about the diagnostic importance of the test and how heavily the results should be relied upon. Any feedback or editing is welcome as I am still getting used to working on Wikipedia.
Vulpecula Rubra (talk) 17:00, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Terrific!  I'd be glad to help you out, your project sounds well worthwhile.  Basically, the number one thing to do is to add solid, reliable sources. See WP:RS and WP:V.  Because this is a veterinary medicine article, the best sources are those from peer-reviewed journals, but even good solid laypeople's sources such as The Horse magazine (http://www.thehorse.com) can be a good starting place.  (Most of the time, articles in The Horse have a reference to a scientific journal article).  The other thing to do is to think about images, they have to be submitted under a free license (either public domain or the GDFL-CC licenses that allow anyone to use the image for any purpose for free, though you can ask that they credit the author), and most of the time, if I can't find a free image easily on Wikimedia Commons or the free-use images of the US Government (occasionally they have some) or on Flickr (you can search only for CC-licensed images, which can then be imported to Commons), I usually just wait for an opportunity to take them myself, then I can upload them with any license I want.  Montanabw(talk) 19:29, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll be posting my changes shortly and would appreciate some feedback. I'm not sure if 'Specificity' is the best heading for the first section but I can't think of anything more appropriate at the moment. I'd also like to continue working on the 'Usefulness' section by finding another source to back up the one I'm currently using.  Other than that, I'll start looking for a relevant image to include on the page.Vulpecula Rubra (talk) 15:35, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Reorganizing the article

message: Really great work on the article! It's very well organized, and I understood it quite well despite my lack of background on the subject. Nice job with the headings, subheadings, etc. I think that "Specificity" is a good heading for that section...however, since you also reference false positives, maybe "Accuracy" would be more inclusive? Either way, I think it works well. Laineejean (talk) 16:35, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Peer Review
Talk:The Happy Land

message: Importance is arguable, as is class - this is either a relatively important low, or a relatively unimportant medium, and, likewise, a relatively good, referenced Start, or a fairly awful B. Adam Cuerden talk 21:06, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's definitely a "start" - It has no plot summary, cast list, textual analysis....  As to importance, only the G&Ss, Cox and Box and maybe Engaged really get up above low.  Best regards, -- Ssilvers 21:10, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: True, though I've seen a few guideline pages disparaging the necessity of plot summaries. In any case, not bad for a few hours' work, eh? Adam Cuerden talk 21:26, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: The Archive has a brief synopsis that you could refer to, and the libretto is on the archive.  There may be other online sources as well, and there are the articles noted under "Further Reading."  A good start, though!  -- Ssilvers 22:41, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll continue in the morning. It's late and I need to rest. Adam Cuerden talk 22:42, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Now I think if you added a good synopsis this would be a B-class article.  Best regards, -- Ssilvers 00:22, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Work still to do

message: By the by, the image from this article is up for Featured Picture. here. Not sure if it'll get promoted - it's a vote short at the moment. But we shall see! Adam Cuerden talk 00:21, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  FP?
Talk:Central Armed Forces Museum

message: A nice article for the start. I've looked to some of other similar articles and noticed a pretty good content presentation in Canadian War Museum. Maybe description of exhibits and information on other topics should be given here in some similar way? Cmapm 00:02, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion

message: Hi, I was unable to find English-language verifiable sources, as this article is largely unreferenced (I've tagged as that). Even the "English external link" directs to the museum page... in Russian! (or that looks to me). Can anyone please help providing sources and references? Thanks & regards, DPdH (talk) 14:45, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources & references?
Talk:Trinity Episcopal Church (Newport, Rhode Island)

message: Are Trinity Church (Newport, Rhode Island) and Trinity Episcopal Church (Newport, Rhode Island) the same church? I have no idea... StAnselm (talk) 08:51, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, thanks. I'll prepare the merge. StAnselm (talk) 08:29, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal
Talk:Adventures In Missions (Texas)

message: Removed the tone flag because, to the best of my knowledge, previous edits I've just finished have established a neutral tone / npov on the subject.  I may not have done a perfect job of this and so any discussion would be welcome. Plausibleclosets 21:15, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled