lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Virginia State Route 71

message: Total mileage of SR 107 is 0.59+17.40+1.51=19.50 mi in Scott, 9.30 mi in Russell to Parsonage
*Russell
**9.27 mi - whole thing 08-1928-02 11
**3.27 mi?? 09-1928-01 11
*Scott
**1.50 mi from Hartsock to Russell (2.5%) 08-1928-02 11
**1.50 mi from Russell (2.5%) 09-1928-01 11
**part (about 6.79 mi??) of 20.22 mi of Route 122 from Wise County towards Gate City 08-1928-02 11
**10.11 mi from near Snowflake towards Dungannon 09-1928-01 11
**4.80 mi from the end of "Route 122" towards Gate City (2.5%)
**4.80 mi from near Snowflake towards Gate City (2.5%) 09-1928-01 11
**4.93 mi to a point near Route 10 (2.5%) 08-1929-01 15
This seems to be close enough, giving 18.61 (using 6.79, not 10.11).
107 was taken over in Gate City 09-1930-01 4 [0.59 mi].
--NE2 20:17, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Fiat G.50 Freccia

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Fiat CR.32 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RFC bot 05:01, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: i don't think that www.MilitaryFactory.com was a good source  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.52.246.65 (talk) 13:08, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: specification source

message: When I came to copy edit it, I was expecting an article about an aircraft. Instead, it's a mind-numbingly tedious enumeration of how many aircraft (not only G.50s) belonged to which stormi and gruppi, who their pilots were, who got shot down by whom, where they were stationed, etc etc etc. Needs rewriting to focus on the aircraft. --Stfg (talk) 19:43, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I've completed a copy edit anyway. But I think it still needs to be more focussed on the aircraft and lesson the above things. --Stfg (talk) 14:38, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: GOCEreviewed

message: The first aerial victory of a Fiat G.50 already took place on 01.21.1941. Hurricane I P2639 P.O. Wainwright was shot down by a G.50. The ital. Pilot was Ser. Magg. Antonio Patriarca. A G.50 was damaged in this air combat.
Source: A History of the Mediterranean Air War 1940 - 1945
Volume One: North Africa June 1940 - January 1942
Christopher Shores Giovanni Massimello with Russell Guest!
MiZi  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.147.118.199 (talk) 17:56, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fiat G.50 

message: I doubt whether the photograph of the Freccia in Finnish Air Force colors ("Fiat G.50 in Finnish markings, c. 1940") could be from 1940. The aircraft has German-style yellow "Eastern Front" identification bands on the nose and fuselage, and to my knowledge these were only applied during the Continuation War, beginning in the summer of 1941.--Death Bredon (talk) 21:34, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Freccia in Finnish colors 
Talk:Fiat G.55 Centauro

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Fiat CR.32 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RFC bot 05:01, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: I removed some statements, it's not my usual attitude so i'll tell you why and how.
1-What does it means 'umbeteable fighter' at altitude? Better than what? P-38/47/51? FW Ta.152? I found any evidence of that.
2-always was a capable opponent. Maybe! Somethimes, neverthless, he had his bad days, like on 25 april 1944 (three shot down with few results, and the Fiat plants heavily bombed), or,on 1th July 1944, when Torresi was killed and five (2 G.55 and 3 C.205V) were shot down by P-47s, already the killer of the three lost on 25th april.
3- only 105 were built? Obsolete statement: atleast 25 years ago it was already clear that they were almost 300, even if not all completed and delivered to operational units (but still a lot higher than 105!). Stefanomencarelli (talk) 18:35, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Too homerism and incorrect info
Talk:Insulin receptor

message: Actually a large proprtion of the circulating is removed by receptor mediated endocytosis. So there is a pretty good reason  for insulin being in cells. Just not the one that the author was aluding to (see comments to revision of 01:54, 21 August 2006). Ianmc 20:25, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: nah, the internalized insulin bound to the receptor is degraded and the receptor recycled (reactome.org). --Ayacop (talk) 18:14, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Insulin in cells 

message: Much of the content is not linked to references. JFW | T@lk 21:23, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: the article: This protein then begins a phosphorylation cascade, culminating in the activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), which enters the nucleus and phosphorylates various nuclear transcription factors (such as Elk1).
and so what? what does elk1 do? enhance transcription in general or specifically? why? --Ayacop (talk) 18:12, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  so where does it continue?
Talk:Can Kim Hua

message: When I created this article I noticed Cardplayer records Can Kim Hua as coming in 89th place in the 2005 WSOP main event. The hendon mob database has no mention of this and pogerpages has a man named Ut Nguyen as 89th place. If anyone actually knows which is correct it would be appreciated. AFink 21:29, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 2005 WSOP
Talk:SEC filing

message: I merged content from "Form G-1" into a new section "Other filings", since the said article was not notable in itself. If someone wants to move the info somewhere else, please go ahead. Sorted as part of the Notability Wikiproject. --B. Wolterding 16:27, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  G-1 

message: I encountered this form and didn't know what it was.  If anyone can add a definition for this (or explain why it shouldn't be here), I'd appreciate and I think it would make the article more complete. Outsideshot (talk) 06:50, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  SC 13G/A 

message: I just started updating and reformatting the "All Forms" section even providing a link to the PDF so anyone can continue it. Michealin (talk) 16:25, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update and Reformat 

message: Please investigate the additions of SECFilings.com:
*http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=SEC+filing&diff=prev&oldid=46337431
*http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=SEC+filing&diff=prev&oldid=75573697
*http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=SEC+filing&diff=prev&oldid=149619591
*http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=SEC+filing&diff=prev&oldid=151530803
The website seems a bit suspicious (much data queried for the compulsory registration). Thanks --Conpibien (talk) 18:12, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Done - removed by Hu12. --Conpibien (talk) 16:13, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  SECFilings.com - spam?
Talk:31st United States Congress

message: *This article is COMPLETE and meets the current standard for this series of articles.
*suggestions for future improvements:
#supplemental Senate & House committees article
#supplemental district maps article
#narrative for major legislation
#narrative for major events
stilltim 04:01, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Does anyone know why  was unrepresented during the entire 31st Congress (1849-1851)? —Markles 13:36, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mass 4 
Talk:Provincial park

message: How are Provincial Parks rated according to the IUCN Category (World Conservation Union). To see why I ask, see . My guess is Category Ib, but that is only a guess. Thanks. +mt 21:14, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Classification?

message: The largest is the 2,355,200-hectare (5,820,000-acre) Polar Bear Provincial Park on Hudson Bay.
Actually, I was wrong. 
Belgium is 3.07 million hectares. 
So Frigid Nipple Bear Park is not half the size of Belgium, but actually slightly more than 3/4 the size of Belgium. — MaxEnt 22:31, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hey, that's probably half the size of Belgium
Talk:The Screaming Skull

message: I see that http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0052169/trivia?ref_=tt_trv_trv repeats the idea that Crawford's story inspired this script, but I don't see the resemblance.  The whole story can be read at http://gaslight.mtroyal.ca/scremskl.htm  Perhaps the only thing they share is the title?  Has John Kneubuhl confirmed this?  Thanks!  Darci (talk) 16:25, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inspired by F. Marion Crawford's short story? 

message: "inspired by a gimmick added by William Castle in his film The Tingler (1959)" How could it be inspired by something from a movie released the next year? --Khajidha (talk) 11:24, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Just what the sources say. I'm assuming that since Castle was known for his gimmicks (his previous films all had them) this one was unveiled early. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 14:07, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone needs to double check the sources for more details, we shouldn't have to assume anything. --Khajidha (talk) 14:28, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Currently, it is suggested "The Screaming Skull" got its free burial if you die of fright from the "Macabre" offer of life insurance against death by fright. The release date of "The Screaming Skull" is listed as Jan 1958. The release date of "Macabre" is listed as Mar 1958 but its production dates were Jul-Aug 1957. But that does not tell us when the promotional campaigns were started. -- Naaman Brown (talk) 21:56, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inspiration for free burial gimmick 
Talk:Prophetic perfect tense

message: The article describes prophetic perfect tense as "a literary technique", yet categorizes it as a grammatical tense. It seems to me that the categorization does not apply as there is not indication that "prophetic perfect" exists as a discrete tense; rather, it's a particular application of tenses described elsewhere. Any objection to removing the categorization as grammatical tense? -- Shunpiker 15:53, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Classification as [[grammatical tense]] 

message: See. Doug Weller talk 17:10, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  A source 

message: Isn't this construction just the BE-perfect, which is pretty much identical to the HAVE-perfect that is used today?  The BE-perfect stopped being used around the 19th century.  I don't think that there is a "prophetic perfect" in the way that this author described.104.201.87.70 (talk) 14:45, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  The BE-Perfect 

message: The text explains the article much better. The graphic confuses the reader. It implies the prophecy is certain to be fulfilled in reality rather than the perspective of the prophecy's author. Ardagoose (talk) 11:08, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove the graphic 

message: "a literary technique used in the Bible". Which bible translation is this article talking about? Is this technique used in all English translations? Is it also in the original text?
And: currently the article makes it sound like the technique is unique to the bible. Are there other examples? 131.174.142.116 (talk) 09:11, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which bible?
Talk:Suddenly I See

message: Was this Lesbian oriented song a candidate for the 2008 election?  Help me find a source as this IS an interesting fact for this tune.  Keep watching, it is this or Celine Dion. On a personal note, this lesbian Democrat is watching and hoping!  Imagine a better theme song that can reach 10 percent of the voters with a wink wink nudge while the the Fly over states naively tap their toes to this diddy!  Brilliant!  Cr8tiv June 20 3 pm Cr8tiv 16:49, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Hilary Clinton]] theme song?

message: Observation: This article is about everything but the song itself. Not that it needs to contain the full lyrics or detailed descriptions of the chords but it should at least say something about what the song is about, why people like, what is unique about it, etc.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 163.181.251.9 (talk) 17:56, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The song itself 

message: Could anyone include an external link to a page with the right lyrics? Thaks. Pabletex (talk) 21:54, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Lyrics

message: Details of the film: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1638002/
"Proof" screenshot taken from the closing credits: http://abload.de/img/suddenlyiseeg8qt4.png
Maybe someone can include this? I'm not a native english speaker and kind of afraid of inserting mistakes in here. ;)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.148.100.232 (talk) 21:45, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use in the movie "Love Rosie" from 2014
Talk:F-22 (series)

message: It was released on May 25, 1999 and, for the time, displayed very realistic graphics and realistic physics of flying a plane. The makers gained legitimacy by Lockheed Martin sanctioning their product, the actual makers of the real-life F-22
The fact is that compared to other mil flight sims of the era it's physics was awful.
They stated that they had the 'sign of approval' from Lockheed Martin, but they still named it 'F-22 Lightning', instead of the correct 'Raptor'.
If you take this 'simulator', and stomp on the rudder bar, it will turn like a well behaved lorry. No roll, no side slip, it's running on rails.
No matter what speed, height, angle of attack or load, it turns like a truck, even when standing still at the ground.
Hdw 20:00, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Realistic? 

message: This article was moved from F-22 Lightning 3 to F-22 Lightning based on a request for the creation of F-22 Lightning 2, whereupon it was decided a series article would be better than two individual articles. Sources brought up that would be good for expanding the article;  Nifboy (talk) 22:36, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Moved
Talk:Rosi

message: "The SWS was recently re-written using Java technology which has greatly increased usability. Notorious for being unresponsive during busy periods such as the first day of course enrolment, recent changes to ROSI are geared towards improving SWS response times allowing students to do their work faster."
Although ROSI is undoubtedly "notorious for being unresponsive during busy periods", the second part of this statement about the imrprovements makes it sound like these problems have been eliminated, when in reality ROSI still has severe stability problems during peak times, and even during non-peak hours when accessed from off-campus locations. Anyone else from U of T with experience with ROSI think this should be reworded/changed to more accurately reflect the current state of ROSI operation? - 20:48, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV/inaccurate?
Template talk:Futurama

message: To anyone watching this page: Where should Planet Express Ship be included in this? Characters (she does have a personality and a social life) or Other? Thanks--Stardust8212 21:04, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: For lack of a better place, I've just added it to the "Technology and Science" line. The ship was only a distinct character for a single episode. EVula 21:09, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Today I removed 'dark matter' and 'holophonor' as those two articles were redirected into List of Futurama gadgets per AfD consensus. KrakatoaKatie 05:13, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Does anyone want to try to add a show/hide button to this box? It would be good if shorter pages (such as Suicide Booth) didn't have this large box at the bottom. Just an idea though. I might give it a try sometime but I may screw it up. Stardust8212 21:50, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's great, thanks WillMak050389! Stardust8212 02:04, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I thought someone had asked for collapsibility, but I couldn't find the discussion at the WikiProject so I didn't reply. Who would've thought it would be here? Anyway, I had to color the top bar and the "Futurama" at the top looks off center, but I hope it looks good. --WillMak050389 02:16, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hide button

message: Anybody know why this section went all funny? I'm pretty sure it used to be centered and now it's thrown off to the left side. I haven't seen any recent revisions that would have caused this and yet it seems to have happened. My template skills are not sufficient to fix it so does anybody else want to have a go? Stardust8212 12:47, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Alignment of "universe" section

message: I think the template needs a section for the four movies - anyone else? TheUncleBob (talk) 13:58, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the link in the "Media" section is sufficient for navigation. Stardust8212 16:14, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Movies section?
Talk:Service delivery platform

message: With the advent of API Gateways, full stack BSS platforms and devops ways of working, the SDP concept should be considered legacy. There are no recent standards, even device management, LBS, etc. standards are considered legacy.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 197.185.99.31 (talk) 17:41, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: SDP no longer relevant

message: Is the service delivery platform mainly concerns deliver service to mobile clients?
fyi - I have requested that anonymous users be prevented from editing this page to prevent further marketing info from being added.
MxHyway 19:47, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Early comments

message: This article starts with a bad reference. It says that TM Forum is working to define a standard for SDPs and links to their website; while it's true they're working on it, their documentation is pay-to-read, which is absurd since it aims to be a standard. Users should be informed about that so that they do not waste their time looking for something they can find but not use, especially when there's absolutely no reference to the OCCI (http://occi-wg.org/) standard which is open and available to everyone.
93.62.155.238 (talk) 08:38, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad Reference 

message: Xavient Information Systems (Xavient) does not have a Wikipedia page currently, but is working to build one for publication. Temporarily, I would like to request that within the Service delivery platform article, the page users are directed to when they click "Xavient Information Systems" that lists Xavient as not having a page on Wikipedia is removed and replaced with a link to the company's website at www.xavient.com. The link to the website will only be used temporarily until Xavient's page is developed and published. I am new to Wikipedia, and am using the talk page to ensure properly reviewed edits and conflict of interest (COI) compliance.
Thank you.
Hankypanky789 (talk) 20:18, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request
Talk:Turn (Great Big Sea album)

message: The order of the tracks doesn't agree with the CD for sale on Amazon.
Does anybody know if the album was sold with different track orders ever?
Cjhoyle (talk) 16:13, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Track Order???
Talk:Cephalaspidomorphi

message: According to the Tree of Life web project, Cephalaspidida is a group within Osteostraci, not the other way around.  Furthermore, Galeaspida is a class and is not grouped within Cephalaspidomorpha.--Mr Fink 21:06, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

message: IUCN lists 22 species of class cephalaspidomorphi as (not only extant but) of Least Concern or Lower Risk (least concern). More information available here: https://www.iucnredlist.org/search?taxonomies=100064&searchType=species --Te Karere (talk) 23:24, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: that's because they don't recognize the class Hyperoartia and included lampreys in the class Cephalaspidomorphi   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  23:56, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  IUCN 22 LC or LR/lc species
Talk:Calf of Man

message: Is there any chance of an IPA pronunciation for the Manx name for this location?Jimjamjak (talk) 13:07, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 

message: This is at best an alternative name, most reputable sources call it the Calf of Man, e.g. Isle of Man government website, Ordnance Survey maps etc. Dabbler (talk) 13:31, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Calf of Mann
Talk:Cape Flattery Light

message: Which? State or National? LessHeard vanU 20:53, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I reworded it so congress is not an issue. --Digon3 13:55, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Congress in text 
Talk:Spartacus (The Farm album)

message: er.... how come the album went to number one in March when it came out in April?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.102.76.163 (talk) 21:19, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A few notes:
* There might be a little TMI in the background and release sections (e.g., the high school English teacher bit).
* Reorganize the lead to reflect the structure of the article.
* Left a few cleanup tags in the article.
* I would change the book page number references to .
* The lead says critical reception was good, but the reception section starts with "Critical opinion was split on the quality of Spartacus' songwriting." Most of the reviews quoted from in that section seem at best ambivalent.
voorts (talk/contributions) 20:09, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  GOCE copy edit
Talk:Cape Hinchinbrook Light

message: I removed the infobox because I can't seem to get it to work! Please look in the history to find the old (not working) version if you want to try to fix it. Jarfingle 07:56, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox 
Talk:Cape May Lighthouse

message: Why is this article not called Cape May Light HOUSE?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.111.222.3 (talk) 01:25, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Because the Coast Guard calls them "lights". Mangoe (talk) 04:40, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: But the common name is lighthouse, and that's what Wikipedia follows. Moving the page. oknazevad (talk) 15:17, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  why? 

message: Hi Everyone,
     I wanted to post this prior to actually updating the page, but I'd like to add a sentence or two at the end of the first paragraph, pointing out Cape May Lighthouse's views of Cape May Cove and Battery 223, with a link to Wikipedia's Battery 223 article.  If you have any objections, concerns, or suggestions, just let  me know.13theguy13 (talk) 19:22, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Planning to Add a Few Sentences of Lighthouse Views
Talk:Cape Naturaliste

message: This article needs immediate attention. Firstly it is incomprehensible, secondly there must be more that can be said on this important geographic feature, and thirdly, and perhaps most importantly, the image provided is NOT of the Cape Naturaliste lighthouse, but of the Cape Leeuwin one! Danielfranklin78 (talk) 14:17, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I just cleaned house here, tried to form a comprehensible part out of the given fractions on the general geography of this place and then added some lighthouse info. There is also a good history section on The Cape Naturaliste Lighthouse. It would certainly help if someone could include the facts here. I'd do that, but don't have the time. De728631 (talk) 01:48, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Major problems with this article