lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Cauchy's integral formula

message: I think that you need also to demand the the subset U is also connectable. i.e. U is a domain in the complex plain. MathKnight 22:49, 21 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: That's tacitly already there, in the comments about the disk. Michael Hardy 20:05, 27 Feb 2004 (UTC)

message: \oint_C {z^2 \over z^2+2z+2}\,dz = \oint_{C_1} {\left({z^2 \over z-z_2}\right) \over z-z_1}\,dz + \oint_{C_2} {\left({z^2 \over z-z_1}\right) \over z-z_2}\,dz 
When I go back again, I get \oint_C {2z^2 \over z^2+2z+2}\,dz. Is the equation wrong (one z too much, or a 0.5 missing)? --Abdull 17:33, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong equation? 

message: #The article speaks of variable substitution. May Integration by substitution be meant here?
#Also, ...[...] Clearly the poles become evident, their moduli are less than 2 and thus lie inside the contour [...]. What is meant with moduli? 
Thanks, --Abdull 17:37, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: 1. Yes. 2. The modulus of a complex number z=a+bi is |z|=\sqrt{a^2+b^2}, and one checks that –1–i and –1+i both have modulus √2, which is less than 2, as claimed.  -lethe talk [ +] 22:38, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  moduli and [[variable substitution]] 

message: For some reason, this article claimed that the Cauchy differentiation formula (i.e. derivative version of Cauchy integral formula) is sometimes called "Bach's differentiation formula".  I expect this is almost certainly vandalism.  It was introduced on 9th Aug 2009 from an IP user ().  I've certainly never heard this name and a quick Google turns up only Wikipedia pages and a forum post that I expect got the name from Wikipedia.
I've reverted it to "Cauchy". Tcnuk (talk) 12:00, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Bach's" differentiation formula? 

message: It is never stated what exactly 'f' is, what is its relation to 'g', and then it is imemdiately used to calculate something.  It took me quite some time to figure out what is going on.  It would be very benefitial if someone who understands what is going on would fix it and maybe add a little bit of "reasoning" about what is going on. 94.112.136.34 (talk) 15:54, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Example is unclear
Talk:Aspleniaceae

message: This should be merged with spleenwort, the article text is sufficient to discuss the fine points of taxonomy, and redirs will connect usefully. Stan 23:28, 21 Feb 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Eraser

message: In common American slang, 'rubber' is used as a synonym for a condom.  Should that be mentioned here?  Possibly with a link to condom. T-bonham (talk) 18:55, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: If this article was about a prophylactic then sure, but prophylactically adding that phrase serves no purpose. The rubber link redirects to the appropriate non–American term.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 01:28, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe that it should be in some way mentioned, at least when searching "rubber" on Wikipedia. 89.161.45.37 (talk) 13:38, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It's already mentioned at Rubber (disambiguation).  By the way, please don't change spellings from one correct version of English to another without good reason.  See WP:ENGVAR for our policy.  Dbfirs 15:12, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "rubber" = condom 

message: On Wikipedia, no advertising is able to be on a page, right? If so, why is the sample of an eraser erasing an error in the name “Wikipedia”? This is very hypocritical.
Cheers, Submarine112 Mister Submarine (talk) 03:06, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unnecessary advertising 

message: Should the environmental effects of producing and using erasers, especially the types made of plastics be mentioned? The crumbs of micro plastic from used erasers can easily be spread to the local environment... 2A05:F6C2:5FF:0:F5FA:7539:F2DF:318E (talk) 07:27, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: If reliable sourcing can be shown to support a claim that eraser crumbs are a significant source of microplastics persisting in the environment, that could be mentioned. I suspect that erasers' contribution is orders of magnitude less than that of textiles and tires, to mention two prominent sources of this kind of pollution. Just plain Bill (talk) 20:58, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Microplastic?
Talk:Kitchener–Waterloo

message: "Kitchener-Waterloo is connected by Weber Street, which also runs through Cambridge." While Weber Street runs through Kitchener and Waterloo it does NOT run through Cambridge. Weber Street ends in Kitchener at the Hwy 8 ramp. At this point, King Street continues. When King St (Kitchener) goes under the Hwy 401 bridge, it becomes Shantz Hill Rd (Cambridge). Shantz Hill Rd terminates at a T-intersection with Fountain Street (Cambridge).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Beowulf cam (talk • contribs) 21:40, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Erroneous Info
Wikipedia talk:Deletion requests

message: Eloquence & Angela, thanks for working on this!  And forgive me if nobody's supposed to be commenting on this page yet; I couldn't figure out where to put this suggestion.
Re: requests for undeletion -- it seems to me that many of the problems with deletion (unavailability of someone's work without asking a sysop; difficulty in viewing old content for considering undeletion, apparent finality and unpleasantness) could be remedied in a tangential way:
: Have separate ways to mark an article "removed/non-archived" and "deleted"; the former would be used for all but the most legally and associatively bad cases -- copyvio, slander, grossly offensive content running afoul of policy.  Any logged-in user [but not a spider or google-bot] could see all non-archived history for a given page.  For instance, say
:: Jan: Alex creates a "Cher" page that says "kjdkfjasdkf" which is removed
:: Feb: Bo creates a new "Cher" page that defames Cher the star, which is deleted 
:: March: Ciprian crates a "Cher" page which is all about his kitten by that name, which is first somehow redirected to "User:Ciprian/Cher" and then removed 
:: April: Dario creats a page about the 19c French drinking song "Cher", redirected to "Cher (song)"
:: June: Fleur pastes a long segment from the American popstars latest autobio into a new article about Cher, which is deleted.
:: July: Jomo puts up a suitable page on Cher, which stays.
:Then it should be possible for any logged-in user to see everything but Bo's and Fleur's entries, by date, as long as they were associated with the page title "Cher"... as a stopgap, before this is implemented, the last revision of a deleted article can at least be made available to logged-in users this way.
:::+sj+ 00:44, 2004 Feb 22 (UTC)
:Have you seen Deletion management redesign on Meta? Perhaps there or the feature suggestions page might be better places to discuss that? Angela. 00:53, Feb 22, 2004 (UTC)
::I'd seen the first; my update from a few weeks back is the last one on the page (before that it had been over a month).  The MW feature/bug discussion page looks more active; thanks!  BV's todo list is down for the nonce, so I wasn't sure where to post.  Moving this there...
Looks great. As soon as this is flying I hope we'll look seriously at the process of speedy deletion. As many well know, I'd like to make both obvious pranks and commercial abuse of the site candidates for this. But make haste slowly I think. Andrewa 17:09, 19 Mar 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Daisy

message: I moved Transvaal Daisy to Gerbera where it belongs. --Chino 09:15, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Transvaal Daisy

message: Another picture of daisy.
This is a Marigold (Calendula) - MPF 15:13, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture

message: This article is not attinent to Bellis perennis. It is Wrong, see Bellis_perennis on Commons and frWiki.--Archenzo    Talk 10:41, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Not attinent

message: this is a marigold, not a daisy—Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.173.71.114 (talk • contribs)  17:42, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  WRONG 

message: A question about a use of the word 'daisy':
In the film 'Tombstone' (the story of the Earp brothers et al) the character Doc Holliday uses the term 'daisy' at least twice.  I believe that its attribution to him is historically accurate.  Is the term 'daisy' as used in this contect some archaic slang term from Holliday's time/place, or was it particular to him.  In either case, what does it mean in this context? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.245.220.249 (talk • contribs) 23:06, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Word daisy

message: "Daisy" is an old word that used to mean "tough". Basically, the opposite of "Pansy". 69.230.196.223 00:03, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What "Daisy" means in terms of Tombstone, AZ 

message: Removed this
:Daisy is more commonly known as Despina, in Greek. It is also known as Marguerite in French, or Margarida in portuguese.
Marguerite/Margarida comes from the Greek word for 'pearl', and according to Despoina, that name means 'damsel' or 'queen'.  Rojomoke (talk) 21:41, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed translations 

message: Reworded from my answer to a question on my Talk page: Lists of people who share a given name (or surname) do not normally go on disambiguation pages -- they go (if anywhere) on articles, and there's a project for it: Wikipedia:WikiProject Anthroponymy. Since an anthroponymy article exists, try adding such a list of people with the given name "Daisy" to Daisy (given name), similar to the list on Juniper (given name), of, if the consensus there is to keep a list of name-holders off the article, create a separate list article such as List of Susans and link it from Daisy (given name). But disambiguation pages are not the place for them when the anthroponymy articles exist (WP:DABNAME). -- JHunterJ (talk) 11:21, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  People (and characters) with the given name Daisy
Talk:James Carville

message: Is anyone aware of any coding, constraints, or any other provisions of this article that would create a situation where existing edits and material here would be displaced by new edits?  I attempted to edit in new and updated material on Carville working to defeat Pennsylvania Senator elect John Fetterman during this year's primary, and when I tried to do so, some of the existing sections at the bottom of the article were no longer visible.  Many thanks in advance for any insight on this situation.CriticalChris CriticalChris 20:48, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problems editing in new material (November, 2022) 

message: This without question is an opportunity for the Democrats to bring some sort of sanity back to the process. She is prune herself, moral and honest on the subjects of the past year without question. All of you have worked with her. This is a time sensitive situation. We must act always lose this opportunity once again. Liz Cheney speaker of the house 2603:6011:A500:2188:174:AB3E:D85D:2339 (talk) 15:12, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Liz Cheney for speaker of the House
Talk:List of U.S. communities with Asian-American majority populations

message: Jengod: There's nothing UNCATOGERIZED about the other cities you've included - they are cities of a certain population level.  You've just not wanted to do the work to explain the information is based on 2004 population estimates and not the 2000 Census.  Well, do the work.  They certainly aren't UNCATOGERIZED (a nebulous phrase that helps no one).
I agree.  This should be changed.  Just go to the pages for each city and figure out what their populations is.  But I have serious questions about the inclusion of those "uncategorized" locations.  These number don't match what is in the city articles.  Either they should be removed from this page, or the numbers updated on the city article pages, with some indication as to where they number is coming from.  RickK 01:56, 22 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Dude, I was just trying to help. You can have your glorious little province. Enjoy. jengod 03:02, Feb 22, 2004 (UTC)
Yes, it's unforunate that this RickK person has to put a damper on things.  (self-righteous people: ugh!)  Actually, it's at least a good start for Jengod to add those cities to show there are indeed more cities with Asian American predominance.  By the way, Moncrief, judging by Jengod's personal homepage, she's female! 
(I'm the guy that keeps working and updating the San Gabriel Valley article constantly.) S. 172.198.51.117 07:34, 23 Feb 2004 (UTC)

text: As I mentioned, I have no problem including those cities that an article in the LA Times now estimates are majority Asian American.  However, if you're going to include them, you need to either put an asterisk next to those cities citing the fact that the information about them is not from the 2000 Census or otherwise reformulate the entry to show that what it says in the header about this being official census data does not apply to these additional cities.  That's all.  Moncrief 07:38, 23 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The second table should be sorted automatically. It is also very confusing with rank numbers missing.
Additionally, the first two tables do not agree with the lead which repeatedly states that the page only includes cities with a majority (>50%) Asian. —Naddruf (talk ~ contribs) 20:58, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second table
Wikipedia talk:Press releases/February 2004

message: What's the difference between the eo and fr links at the top of the article and the standard inter-language links?  --Spikey 03:51, 22 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: For some reason their versions of the press release are on Meta. I have no idea why they would do that. --mav 03:57, 22 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  eo and fr 

message: I find the last sentence a bit confusing: "Unlike the rest of Wikimedia's content, the text of this press release is placed into the public domain." given the earlier statement that "All Wikimedia content is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, which permits anyone to reuse Wikimedia content in any way they wish, etc". Perhaps add to the first sentence: ", thus can be used in any way without referring to the source" or something like that Erik Zachte 13:14, 22 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, since it is public domain, it can also be used under the GFDL as well, so it is effectively available under the GFDL as well.   Link to previous comment about public domain.. Jrincayc 19:16, 22 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: public domain

message: Why are we waiting until Februrary 25 to release it since it hit 500,000 on feb 22? Jrincayc 22:14, 22 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: To give more time for other languages to draft their version, more time to finish this version, more time to finish Main Page/Test, and more time for the developers to batten down the hatches. This should spare the servers from much strain (each language version is going to choose its own release day - some are releasing now, others are waiting). --mav 22:31, 22 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Wednesday release?

message: I think the commas and the end at the end of the first list should be removed (or, less preferred, add them to the second list to make them uniform). Dori | Talk 17:31, Feb 24, 2004 (UTC)
:I'll take them out.--mav
::Fuzheado beat you to it :) I also got a conflict with him on changing frontpage -> front page (exact same subject header too). I think Wikipedia has indoctrinated us to think alike. Dori | Talk 17:37, Feb 24, 2004 (UTC)
::: Nitpicking mindshare! We're obviously doing something right. :) Fuzheado 17:50, 24 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Nitpicking

message: May you remove the interlinks? They're all on Wikidata now, and some of them were also wrong. Thank you. --Horcrux92 (talk) 13:08, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interlinks
Talk:Amor asteroid

message: 433 Eros has a lower number than 1221 Amor, so it was discovered earlier. But, that contradicts the article (saying that 1221 Amor was the first Amor asteroid to be discovered and that Eros is an Amor asteroid). What's up with that? --- hike395 02:02, 22 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Given that we're talking intersecting ellipses, isn't it incorrect to use the terms 'from the inside' or 'from the outside'? By their geometric definition, when two ellipses intersect--and cross--they'll both be 'outside' at some point and they'll both be 'inside' at some point. Can I take out these terms?
Friedlad (talk) 13:33, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of "from the inside" or "from the outside" 

message: Using the appropriate on-page links, I have found that two objects listed here as Amors, 3671 Dionysus and 65803 Didymos, are listed as Amors by MPC, but are not listed as such by the JPL Small-body database. The on-Wiki page for Didymos identifies it as an Apollo, and the perihelion value suggests that characterization is correct (by about 450,000 km). My question is: Which source should be used here for asteroid (and other object) classification, MPC or JPL? JoJo Anthrax (talk) 10:48, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  JPL vs. MPC lists 

message: The "Populations" section of this article dates to 2004, and was added by User:Youknowandy, who has made no edits to enWiki in over eight years. Although the presented classification schemes are interesting, the entire section is unsourced, and I have been unable to find any independent, reliable sources that utilize, or refer to in any way, these classification schemes. The section is thus likely to be derived entirely from original research (OR), and is thus inappropriate for a WP article. Unless I hear otherwise - that is, unless someone can find, and add, RS for this material - I will remove this section within the next few days. Thanks. JoJo Anthrax (talk) 18:28, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I have made the revision described above, along with other edits to the Population section. I have been unable to find any RS supporting the removed content (and a fair argument can be made that more content merits removal, being apparently derived from OR), but please restore the content if RS can be found. Thanks. JoJo Anthrax (talk) 17:23, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Populations section - apparent OR
Talk:Zhongyuan University of Technology

message: The hard men`s life 
Today`s society places unprecedented requirements on men in term of wealth and career.As the society has entered into the `Youth Era`,men feel they must be both rich and charming.So some of them catch in a vicious cycle,and can not stop working.Some of them do not have degrees and always blomed by their wives or enve by themseves.And they live with a large sense of guilt and pain.
Inview of this,men`s lives quality deteriorates year by year.And some one points out ,`Health refers not only to physiological health,but also psychological health and social endurance.`
Fir revitalizing men`sroles in sociaty,the hope is that men will relax their high tempe life and reliscover joys other than making money.
what does this have to do with the article? RickK 02:08, 22 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:McMug

message: Do we need to put the copyright info on this page, vs. the image page? RickK 03:22, 22 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: several things have not been translated--
: the school life of McMug is affected by the school motto, "吾德物賜".  (from the School life of McMug section)
: McMug Songs (section)
(anonymous) 17:43, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  translations 

message: does iyellowbus.com still exist? looks as if it's been taken over by those advertising companies.
try http://www.yellowbus.com.hk/ I amended the link on Alice Mak p-age. GB 12:41, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  website
Talk:Barbarella (comics)

message: The information about the song "Barbarella as a Boy" is false, it never appeared in the Devil May Cry video game. The song was among others that Izzy Novak did in a group called Devil May Cry. I'll try and change it myself, but I don't edit on Wikipedia often.
Serke (talk) 23:37, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Devil May Cry

message: Is "chanteuse" different from "singer"?  If so, is it standard enough English not to need a link to a wiki entry explaining it?--Richardson mcphillips (talk) 15:30, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not really different, no. It's just a colorful (read: pretentious) French loan-word that means "female singer". (Pretentious in English, I mean.) No different than saying "songstress" or "crooner" instead of "singer". It is fairly common English, at least in some circles, but if people find it problematic or feel it needs to be explained then I'd suggest simply changing it to "singer" instead. — FeRD_NYC (talk) 09:23, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "chanteuse"
Talk:Yabloko

message: true position Yabloko correct to name radical liberalism Gnomsovet (talk) 21:00, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Any sources or just trying to express your opinion on that matter, too? --Miacek and his crime-fighting dog (woof!) 22:01, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  true position Yabloko 

message: Quiz for Russian language learners: Which abbreviation was suggested by Zhirinovsky for «Явлинский — Болдырев — Лукин» bloc? - üser:Altenmann >t 06:29, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  ЯБЛ 

message: As listed on list of heads of federal subjects of Russia, one of the governors in Russia is Dmitry Makhonin, who is a member of the Yabloko party. Would it then be worth adding one governor to the graphic of elected representatives in the summary box for the Yabloko party? Caretaker John (talk) 16:54, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Makhonin is clearly not a member of Yabloko. He ran once on their lists, but that is in the past. 72.68.118.186 (talk) 02:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maybe add one governor to elected representatives list 

message: This party is part of the so-called "System opposition". 2A02:3030:805:250C:1:0:32B5:245E (talk) 12:13, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  System opposition 

message: What is the position of the party on the invasion of Ukraine that started in 2022? Has there been some news about the circumstances? Has the party been banned or is it publically for the war but privately against it? 166.62.226.9 (talk) 04:48, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, it was there all along, sorry guys, little oopsie. 166.62.226.9 (talk) 17:40, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Position on the Invasion of Ukraine
Talk:Li Bai

message: I don't know what, if anything, might be added regarding Li Bai's presence (under the spelling Li Po) in the Riverworld series of books by Philip Jose Farmer, or if it's even desirable.  From the discussions above it looks like people have bigger fish to fry.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.35.40.205 (talk) 02:40, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Popular References
Talk:Over the Edge (radio program)

message: :I am finding it very hard to stay NPOV on this topic. Personally I am a fan of the show and would appreciate anyones help in helping un-stub this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jubal (talk • contribs) 04:11, 22 February 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: To the "fan" above (Jubal), I'm afraid I'm in the same boat! :) And presumably the article's present state has answered Zandperl's questions, but "some other category" hits the nail on the head! Lusanaherandraton (talk) 18:33, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: >>The audience phone participation ("Receptacle Programming") is another element: listeners are encouraged to call-in, and are placed on-air with no prior screening.<<
Sadly, due to the current climate of censorship on broadcast media, callers do not find themselves directly plugged-in to the airwaves on "Over The Edge" any longer. KPFA has instituted a delay of approximately 15 seconds. 
Could the entry please be edited to reflect this development?
Ordinary 06:07, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Callers no longer enjoy uncensored access to the air 
Talk:Clinton–Kalamazoo Canal

message: Google Search containing much useful information. I have started this article twice now and lost the content. I'm giving up for now, but I wanted a place to park this link to go to it back later.Bkonrad 04:49, 22 Feb 2004 (UTC)