lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Minerva (song)

message: Although being a soundtrack in a video game may not be wiki-worthy to some from a "fan" standpoint. It is certainly wiki worthy. Maybe someone  maintaining Deftones song pages could add that Minerva was used in the soundtrack for EA Games NHL 2004? [] B4Ctom1 (talk) 04:47, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Video Game Soundtrack

message: “Minerva” by Deftones Charted on “Bubbling Under Hot 100 Singles” at number 20 
Source: https://www.billboard.com/music/deftones/chart-history/HBU Ilovelife68 68 (talk) 03:24, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Charted on “Bubbling Under Hot 100 Singles” at number 20
Talk:Lajos Kassák

message: When in 1956 was he elected chair of the body (as this is significant in the context)? Jackiespeel (talk) 10:32, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Writer's Association
Talk:Elite (song)

message: Earlier today I tagged this article with , and a few hours later,  removed this tag stating: It qualifies the eighth criteria: "Has won or been nominated for a major music award, such as a Grammy, Juno, Mercury, Choice or Grammis award." The song won a Grammy; thus is notable." I believe he meant second criteria — being nominated for a Grammy is the 8th criteria for a band, but second criteria for a song at WP:NMUSIC. However, simply winning a Grammy award is not enough to satisfy notability guidelines. This award criteria is clearly preceded with: "The following factors suggest that a song or single may be notable, though a standalone article should still satisfy the aforementioned criteria" and "Notability aside, a standalone article is only appropriate when there is enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged to articles about an artist or album." Since "Elite" was never released as a single, it never received radio play, there was never a music video or any real promotion for the song, I really don't see how this article could grow beyond the two sentences that currently exist here now. I thought I would put the notability tag up now to see if interested parties wanted to attempt to expand the article before taking up the PROD or AFD route. Fezmar9 (talk) 21:37, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Glock

message: Many sources erroneously include Brazil among the countries that don't allow 9x19 Parabellum caliber handguns for civilians because it is a military caliber. This is not the case. Brazil doesn't allow 9x19 because of the power level, rather than because it is a military caliber. As a result, Glock was unable to simply provide 9x21 chambered versions of its 9mm pistols as it did with countries that do not allow civilian use of military calibers (Mexico, France (formerly) and Italy (formerly)).  Glock came out with the .380ACP G25 and G28 models to provide the Brazilian market with versions of their 9mm pistols that would be allowable in Brazil.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by Terr1959 (talk • contribs) 19:00, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brazil caliber limitations 

message: what it says on the tin. I'm not the most knowledgable on specific firearm knowledge, however I believe this variant shoul dat least be fit for an inclusion. If there are objections, let me know. - MountainKemono (talk) 14:40, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: All we need are reliable sources... - Adolphus79 (talk) 20:41, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: hmm. Further research seems to show that while Glock themselves do not sell it (as of 14/02/2023), a quick search reveals it to be made by one GuncrafterIndustries for the G21 and G23. It's also shown me that I should see to creating an article about the company itself, as they have a handful of wikipedia articles. - MountainKemono (talk) 22:20, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  No mention of the 50 GI glock conversion. 

message: Would it be worth mentioning that Glock allows Umarex to make Glock pellet guns, paintball guns and airsoft guns? Godhatessonny (talk) 01:37, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Umarex versions Licensed by Glock 

message: Suggesting here due to potential COI:
Under Glock#First-generation_models, in reference to "pencil barrels", it's tagged as potential original research: 
These early Glock 17 "pencil barrel" pistols are considered rare and highly desirable by Glock collectors.[original research?]
A suitable reference for this information can be found here, & the article contains many more factual tidbits about 1st-gen GLOCKs that may be of interest if other editors wish to expand on that section. It outlines the recent sale of a "pencil-barrel" for over $5,500 on GunBroker.com.
Suggested change w/ reference citation:
These early Glock 17 "pencil barrel" pistols are considered rare and highly desirable by Glock collectors. LoVeloDogs (talk) 20:00, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested citation (from COI) to replace {{original research inline|date=March 2021}}
Talk:Totino-Grace High School

message: I attend Totino-Grace right now, The Logo on the Wikipedia page is not up to date. I understand the Logo Rules and Regulations for Totino-Grace but that is currently not the official logo. I am not too experienced on this stuff so if anyone can update it if possible, please do.  Coolman1151 (talk) 14:11, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Logo
Talk:Joseph Finegan

message: This is a marvelous first run of an article. I'd recommend adding a separate bibliography. Good work. Wildhartlivie (talk) 17:57, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment 

message: His grave says Joseph Finnegan with the additional N. The title of the article was previously Joseph Finegan. I added the (Brigadier general) after it because of the disambiguation. Some sources say Finegan while others say Finnegan. I'm fairly certain those sources are wrong about his last name. I would go with his name on the grave as Joseph Finnegan as the true source. If anyone else agrees or disagrees with his last name and sources say it on here.  --Excel23 (talk) 23:41, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last name 

message: Does anyone know where Rutledge is located? I'm assuming somewhere in Jacksonville but where exactly is that?--Excel23 (talk) 23:41, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rutledge, Florida 

message: Was Finnegan a Catholic?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by LienEmpire (talk • contribs) 05:51, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Catholic? 

message: I've restored the "Finegan" spelling as it seems to be more common in the sources, including those already used here. I've left a note in the intro including Finnegan as an alternate form.--Cúchullain t/c 18:34, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last name 

message: No mention of slave-owning. I feel that this category should be restricted to people whose slave-owning history was notable in itself. Valetude (talk) 19:25, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category:American slave owners
Talk:120-PM-43 mortar

message: It appears to be a variant of the M1938 mortar based on this article I discovered  Nohomers48 (talk) 11:21, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info on this weapon 

message: The weapon in the photo at the top of this article is probably just an M-1938 (120-PM-38) due to the recoil cylinders seen on this example, which are too short to be those of an M-1943 (120-PM-43). The recoil cylinders on the M-1943 were substantially longer, reaching down to approximately 30cm of so from the breech piece. The double loading stop seen attached to the previously plain muzzle was added to many 120-PM-38s and PM-43s during the 1960s or 1970s.SASH155 (talk) 02:47, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo seems to show a modified 120-PM-38 (M-1938).
Talk:Wanshan Archipelago Campaign

message: Just browsing through this page, I've noticed that the PRC forces are repeatedly referred to as "enemy".  Since this is obviously not NPOV, it'd be great if someone corrected it...  Miranche (talk) 22:34, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I was going to make the same point, in October 2012, but saw that this point had been made just over two years previously and nothing had been done since. 78.129.190.172 (talk) 12:48, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Enemy"? 

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:31, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]]
Talk:BAE Systems Electronic Systems

message: the website link is dead. --Wongba (talk) 16:18, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: website link
Talk:Phocomelia syndrome

message: my name prabal paroha khitola basti sihora dist jabalpur m.p india pin 483225                                                                                                                                             id---pprabal@gmail.com  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.168.219.61 (talk) 09:16, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  phocomelia child 8year i want help from india i am very poor my child is very inteligent
Talk:James Bolivar Manson

message: Great article. Small point; I think that 'Director' shouldn't be capitalised; I read up on the MoS for the volunteer/Volunteer thing in the summer. Unless I am mistaken, or the MoS guidance has changed, I think it should be 'director', unless it is part of a commonly capitalized phrase like 'President of the United States'. Which this maybe is, but I don't think so. Anyone? --John (talk) 06:25, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I was just following usage in the sources, so I think it would be correct, i.e. it is commonly capitalised in the context. Same with Trustee. Tyrenius (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 06:29, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Typically pedantic MoS-type picky question

message: Does the 1901 Census specify the relative ages of these people and confirm they were siblings? Ty 19:07, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference for family

message: Recently the file :File:James Bolivar Manson by Samuel Halpert.jpg (right) was uploaded and it appears to be relevant to this article and not currently used by it. If you're interested and think it would be a useful addition, please feel free to include it. Dcoetzee 00:19, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New file [[:File:James Bolivar Manson by Samuel Halpert.jpg]] 
Talk:TW3 (Albany, New York)

message: It's Time Warner Cable Sports now.
Anthony Guidetti (talk) 00:13, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  This channel doesn't exist
Talk:List of vice-admirals of the coast

message: The scope of the article and the title, 'List of Vice-Admirals of the Coast', mismatch. This isn't a list of the vice-admirals, i.e. the people who held the posts, which are to be found at the individual articles such as List of Vice-Admirals of Cornwall, etc. But it is a list of the posts, so the correct plural, and title for this article, would be 'List of Vice-Admiralties of the Coast'. 77.96.115.80 (talk) 09:13, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plural form
Talk:Raymour & Flanigan

message: I made a purchase totaling $5,000 a few months back.  Had a couple of special orders so received delivery in January/February. The salesperson agreed on. 72 months term for payment. Whomever wrote the sales entered 48 months to pay. Can these terms be corrected. 2606:9400:A19F:7060:743D:20E2:BB69:AC0 (talk) 19:15, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Payment terms
Talk:Forni di Sopra

message: Fabio Colombo is no longer mayor, needs updating. 86.139.35.159 (talk) 18:59, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mayor
Talk:Sacile

message: I heard that there is a famous piano manufacturer in this town...
18.34.5.86 (talk) 08:00, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Lignano Sabbiadoro

message: There should be a redirect from Lignano. Many news sources leave the town's "surname" off. Most English news reports of Oscar Pistorius' Olympic qualifying time at an athletics meet yesterday all say only "Lignano". Roger (talk) 07:30, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I've done it, Lignano now redirects to this article. Roger (talk) 09:02, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Often called just "Lignano" - there should be a redirect.
Talk:Manzano, Friuli Venezia Giulia

message: Is chair-making really a major profession in this town and do they really have an enormous chair in town?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Synetech (talk • contribs) 00:21, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chairs
Talk:Sauris

message: It should be noted that the Italian material that was added to this article had an embedded footnote number, indicating a copy-paste. If from it.wikipedia, the reference could usefully be added. If not, the material should probably be further amplified or otherwise altered to avoid copyvio. Yngvadottir (talk) 16:13, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I found the source in the Italian Wikipedia article and used the referenced site to add 2 footnotes. Yngvadottir (talk) 15:24, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Italian paragraph
Talk:Cox Green, Greater Manchester

message: Cox Green in Sunderland is marked as being in Greater Manchester - this is incorrect/
I have tried, unsuccesfully to edit the detail.
The detail should read as being part of the Borough of Sunderland and NOT Greater Manchester!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.144.98.77 (talk) 23:23, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cox Green incorrect placement & Detail
Talk:Wallsuches

message: Ok. we need a small group of people to do research for this page. I have multiple book sources from the locality (i happen to live a couple of hundred yards from wallsuches)
I have started adding a history for the area, but is yet unfinished.
Please acknowledge if you ar able to help on this page. Wuku (talk) 10:06, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help! 

message: Who ever keeps removing my edit which says wallsuches is within the Historic County of Lancashire,please stop. wallsuches still is and always will be in the historic county of Lancashire so stop keep putting until 1974 after it,this is not correct and not helpful. if you keep removing my edit i will just take the greater manchester part of,one way or another i will get my own back on whoevers removing my edits.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.220.2.30 (talk) 19:30, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This is correct. Apart from the modern building developments, all the history of Wallsuches is relevant to when it was part of Lancashire and so it is correct, accurate and relevant to include the information. Wuku (talk) 12:05, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Lancashire

message: We need a new picture. The current one is a row of cottages on "walsuches lane" but is not actually part of the walsuches village (the area is currently dominated by "Arcon village")
Is anyone able to get a picture? i have seen suitable pictures on the net, but i am not a buff on copyright laws. help please
Wuku (talk) 10:10, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture... that is not walsuches! 

message: whilst on the internet, I found articles which indicate the Wallsuches' bleachworks was the first chemical bleachworks in Europe (and therefore likely the world!). Further that 70% of the cotton exported through empire trade routes was bleached or processed in some way through Horwich. If these points turn out to be factual, it is worth including them in the article. Wuku (talk) 12:09, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bleachworks
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Greater Manchester/Templates

message: I have subst'd this template and removed the category tag from it. This will prevent this project page from being listed as a school. Adam McCormick (talk) 13:18, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  School stub template
Talk:From an Abandoned Work

message: Hi,
When I read this, it hit me: this is what "stream of conciousness" must mean.
And yet there's no mention of stream of conciousness here or on the Samuel Beckett page, and no mention of Beckett on the stream of conciousness page.
It's not Joyce's style of stream of conciousness.  As I see it, it's a sort of a blend.  The thoughts of the main character are expressed in sentences, but they're not his thoughts about one issue or theme, they're all his thoughts, jumping from topic to topic, dumping out the stream of thoughts going through his head, giving as much time to the snail as to his waving mother.
What do others think, is this "stream of conciousness"?  Or a variant of stream of conciousness?  Or something else?  Gronky (talk) 00:10, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this stream-of-conciousness writing?
Talk:Save Me (Shinedown song)

message: Is Eric Bass playing the piano in the live version of "Save me" from Kansas? 2603:6081:2D46:ED97:EDFE:D4A9:C50C:CE56 (talk) 20:42, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Piano player?
Talk:Poem of the Right Angle

message: the section refers to it both ways. I think its the latter, since that's how its spelled in the entry. Bangabandhu (talk) 03:53, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  modular or modulor?
Talk:Prisoner transport vehicle

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot (talk) 07:01, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-12-19 Automated pywikipediabot message 

message: How many seats are on a prison bus 69.120.187.232 (talk) 19:48, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  V
Talk:The Score Group

message: request withdrawn by proposer. Station1 (talk) 06:27, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*　Oppose. This is not an acronym, and so should not be written in all-caps. This is clearly stipulated by WP:MOSTM. --DAJF (talk) 05:15, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

text: Any additional comments:
Thanks for pointing me to that area of the MoS which I obviously haven't read yet. I withdraw the request, but don't know if there is any process to follow in regards to closing this discussion? -- œ™ 05:50, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*　Oppose. This is not an acronym, and so should not be written in all-caps. This is clearly stipulated by WP:MOSTM. --DAJF (talk) 05:15, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: :Any additional comments:
Thanks for pointing me to that area of the MoS which I obviously haven't read yet. I withdraw the request, but don't know if there is any process to follow in regards to closing this discussion? -- œ™ 05:50, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Talk:Solitaire (Martine Clémenceau song)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved. Consistency with song title articles, as it was originally written by Clémenceau. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 23:23, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Solitaire (Laura Branigan song) →  – Originally sung in French; then translated into and sung in English by Laura Branigan. Should use the name original French version's songwriter, Martine Clémenceau. Can't use Diane Warren's name as she wrote the English version, not the French one. George Ho (talk) 21:07, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 23 January 2022
Talk:Fort Frederick (Kingston, Ontario)

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 15:22, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: The red "National Historic Site" box within the infobox suggests Fort Frederick is a national historic site. White it is a part of two others, it doesn't hold the designation under its own name. One possible fix is to leave "Fort Frederick" as the title on this box, but subscribe, below that, two banners which indicate the names of each of the two NHS's of which it is a unit. It's also part of Rideau Canal World Heritage Site, and it might be desirable to note this (looking at how WHSs might be identified elsewhere). 
It's not clear to me how to edit an infobox, so I'm open to learning how to make this one more accurate and attractive. I submit that the red NHS box looks more like a warning than helpful information. Yoho2001 (talk) 08:59, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right - infobox templates pertaining to NHSCs should only be used when the article subject is a NHSC in its own right.  Otherwise, it should be left to the text of the article to explain the circumstances.  I've removed that template, as per your comment.  Good catch. The red box is the country colour assigned to Canada - red.  It doesn't really look like a warning to me. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 20:37, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Museum and NHS (info)boxes 
Talk:Y4K (Ils remix album)

message: ILS Presents: Y4K
::I say redirect!--Billy Nair (talk) 19:34, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I did a redirect but kept all the other info, i saw there were a few items (like chronology for ILS rather than the Y4K series) that might be useful to anyone wanting to transfer them.--Billy Nair (talk) 19:38, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Duplicate page?
Talk:Acosta Sales & Marketing

message: What states have Acosta in to transfer at a later date? 2601:280:5200:2580:1C05:ACEF:95C9:4FF8 (talk) 01:50, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Acosta location in the United States
Talk:S. Parkes Cadman

message: *I've just created this long overdue article about S. Parkes Cadman, the notable clergyman, pioneer radio minister, national church leader, and prolific writer of the early 20th century, as the subject certainly meets Wikipedia: Notability requirements. JGHowes talk -  07:34, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: His New York Times obituary (cited as reference #1) states he was born in Wellington.  JGHowes   talk 22:49, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I note among his earlier books "Charles Darwin and other English Thinkers".  It would be interesting if someone could look into this and, where appropriate, note what it said for his views on Darwin and evolution.  Darwin and Cadman were both Shropshire-born men and Darwin had died during Cadman's lifetime in 1882.Cloptonson (talk) 14:46, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Thoughts on Darwin?
Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers/Archive 85

message: The text before today's changes was better.  There are times when 41.0 actually means 41.0000000 and can be rounded. But there may also be occasions when it should not be rounded.  Isn't that what was intended by the old text? Thunderbird2 14:38, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh dear.  I've just read my post again, and it doesn't make sense at all!  Concerning this edit, what I meant to say was that there are times when it is appropriate to add more significant figures after a conversion than were used before.  For example, 180 degrees is not 3.1 radians, but (approximately) 3.14159 radians.  I think that's what the older text was trying to say. Thunderbird2 19:18, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change to precision in "Decimal points" section