Talk:Barbara Ehrenreich

message: Queued image: 
http://www.oprah.com/tows/pastshows/images/tows_20010521_ehrenreich.jpg
----
What's going on with all these photos? The one just added to the article isn't a particuarly good image. Having met Ms Ehrenreich once, I would say the Birnbaum photo is the best likeness. Why can't we use that? -- Viajero 10:38, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've read "Nickle and Dimed", and I remember her mentioning how she went to a church service in one town, where she commented that the hillbilly-like townspeople reminded her of her own people (her maiden name being Alexander).  Now, she's Jewish, according to the list of Jewish journalists?  Did someone just make an assumption about her married last name?
:Probably. She was listed on the list but I moved her to discussion because I couldn't find a source. So - looks like you solved the mystery. Mad Jack 22:00, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I've made a note on the list discussion page for her removal from the list that needs to be verified, since she isn't. Michael 22:31, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, I see. Someone reads Ehrenreich, and then comes the hasty conclusion: ah, she's jewish ! - But her maiden name was Alexander. Ehrenreich results from a former marriage. Thanks. --129.187.244.28 (talk) 08:35, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hillbilly->Jewish? 

message: Article appears to be compromised by removal of large portions of material by an anon IP add 68.... See history.  This IP address user or these users appear to be attacking other articles (e.g., Alan Dershowitz. --NYScholar 19:13, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism?

message: Pick one please! They are two different things. --69.143.105.237 (talk) 03:27, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Can be, maybe even should be, but in common vernacular useage in modern-day America, they are virtually one and the same (at least if you listen to those talking the loudest).  Are you a U.S.-style "libertarian" who insists (like I once did) that U.S. Democrats aren't true liberals, and that only total absolute laissez-faire capitalist minarchists (or near-anarchocapitalists) are in fact "real liberals", since they are the closest thing in modern times to the "original" classical liberals of the 18th and early 19th centuries?  Or are you a moderate modern U.S. liberal who does not conflate some "welfare statism"/semi-regulated capitalism (or mixed economy) with true socialism? Either way, I think your point is moot, but especially if you are trying to redefine all uses of the word "liberal" to mean only U.S.-style libertarians or quasi-anarchocapitalists. Furthermore, yes, an individual can be both socialist and liberal, in fact, most democratic socialists have been liberals, or have at least self-identified as such (when it comes to terms of civil rights and personal freedoms).  Obviously, authoritarian & totalitarian Communist socialists are not liberals, and likewise, "privatize-everything-even-the-air-we-breath" propertarian neo-classical liberals are not socialists.173.16.125.178 (talk) 20:43, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Liberal or Socialist?

message: Ehrenreich is in the category 'American atheists', but nothing is mentioned in the article.  Is there a source on this?  --Karuna8 (talk) 23:16, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: In Bait and Switch she writes she is an atheist. 82.130.23.80 (talk) 19:56, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  Now the article even mentions^H^H^H says << In a talk she gave in 1999, Ehrenreich called herself a "fourth-generation atheist".[7]. >> To me, that sounds like "Case closed."  --Mike Schwartz (talk) 01:42, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Atheism 

message: This edit: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Barbara_Ehrenreich&diff=prev&oldid=531061118 says "Undid revision [...] by [...] not in article, blp violation".  It undid the addition of "Category:American cannabis activists".  
Is there any doubt that this person is a leader of (or, at least, she seems to have lent her name to) "NORML"?  And isn't "NORML" one of the biggest and most well-known [US] organizations advocating / promoting "reform of marijuana laws"? 
The article does already seem to contain this: "She also serves on the NORML Board of Directors, [...]".  
So (humor me here), does that not count as being a cannabis activist?  I am not un-doing the "undo" at this time (partly because it's a "blp" .. plus I could be wrong.)  However, it seems to me that the "Category:American cannabis activists" was appropriate.   
Any advice? or other comments? --Mike Schwartz (talk) 01:36, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of category -- (what [more] evidence is needed?)  

message: The translations section just contains book titles transferred into other languages. I don't think this is necessary. Any argument against removing the content? ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:30, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I've been bold and removed it. I would hope that any individual book articles mention the translations, though. Gareth E Kegg (talk) 16:20, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation section 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Barbara Ehrenreich. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041016004838/http://www.sfbg.com/lit/march00/smile.html to http://radcliffe.harvard.edu/schlesinger-library
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:36, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Barbara Ehrenreich. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110623005647/http://barbaraehrenreich.com/barbara_ehrenreich.htm to http://www.barbaraehrenreich.com/barbara_ehrenreich.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110609202708/http://www.barbaraehrenreich.com/cancerland.htm to http://www.barbaraehrenreich.com/cancerland.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110725121827/http://www.rooseveltinstitute.org/four-freedoms-medals to http://www.rooseveltinstitute.org/four-freedoms-medals
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150706191702/http://www.barbaraehrenreich.com/cancerland.htm to http://www.barbaraehrenreich.com/cancerland.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:58, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: https://poseidon01.ssrn.com/delivery.php?ID=017096020116091006011029005017091098015051021063079059125001019095123125109011070127006055125009047120052113027116025103017066052085021064086102092092090097001064028045087117118006001087101003112126024085067015116090072088002121073113067084101071027&EXT=pdf is a journal article that is available for free.  Footnote 10 says:
"Barbara Ehrenreich & John Ehrenreich, The Making of the American 99 Percent and the Collapse of the Middle Class, in THE OCCUPY HANDBOOK"
"Occupy" refers to "Occupy Wall Street."  This is not in the list of essays she wrote.
EvanJ35 (talk) 21:27, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Something Else She Co-Wrote 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Barbara Ehrenreich. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110503214236/http://www.hillmanfoundation.org/hillman-prizes/hillman-prize-magazine-journalism to http://www.hillmanfoundation.org/hillman-prizes/hillman-prize-magazine-journalism
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:40, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Barbara Ehrenreich. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121006204928/http://www.motherjones.com/toc/1979/11/table-contents to http://motherjones.com/toc/1979/11/table-contents
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:08, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I've added an "NPOV-section" tag to the "Criticism" section of this article. It is clearly an Ehrenreich bash-fest and igores the fact that many commentators saw Ehrenreich as a victim of left-wing purity politics and a circular-firing-squad mentiality, and/or as yet another example of negative social media "callout culture".
I'll also add that this section is an example of WP:RECENT, putting undue weight on criticism she has received during a recent event, and the inherent bias that a "Criticism" (as opposed to "Reception") article section has. Ehrenreich has had a lot career as an activist and writer, and has received a great deal of praise and criticism from across the political spectrum over the years. Her work cannot be distilled down to one recent Twitter war or a pithy statement like "Overall, we’re faced with yet another milkshake duck situation–where the people we thought to be good and pure end up showing an ugly side." Peter G Werner (talk) 13:11, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  One-sided "Criticism" section 

message: As someone coming to this article knowing nothing about Barbara Ehrenreich, including a single controversial tweet she made seems jarring and doesn't fit the scope of the rest of the article. Just my thoughts.
"In February 2019, Ehrenreich tweeted "I will be convinced that America is not in decline only when our de-cluttering guru Marie Kondo learns to speak English.”[20] This was called another example of a "milkshake duck situation" as she received negative feedback on social media and the press.[21][20]"
Chris1564 (talk) 03:29, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not one single tweet; it's the tip of the iceberg for someone with very little experience with people of Asian descent. She doubled down on the comment too.--A21sauce (talk) 15:52, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not notable 

message: I move to remove the socialist label from this Wikipedia article.  While Ms. Ehrenreich writes from a progressive standpoint and has had associations with democratic socialists, that does not make her a socialist. --CollegeMeltdown (talk) 19:16, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see what's gained by whitewashing a socialist voice into a mere "progressive". JesseRafe (talk) 20:32, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to remove "socialist" label 

message: The lead of this bio seems quite promotional, as if someone picked out the highlights of Ehrenreich's career as they saw it, regardless of what's in the body of the article. For example the lead says that Nickel and Dimed is probably Ehrenreich's best known book and goes on to praise it, but the book is not discussed at all in the body of the bio. Goodtablemanners (talk) 20:15, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree the lead is an issue. Firefangledfeathers 20:58, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

text: Fixed by expanding the body, which I can't believe didn't have anything about the book until now! Levivich 18:52, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Promotional lead

message: I don't believe that Reed College awarded BS degrees in the years that Ehrenreich attended. Pretty sure it would have been a BA degree. 2601:1C0:6100:AD:556F:92E6:2237:3460 (talk) 06:12, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undergraduate degree?