Talk:Uruzgan Province

message: ===Daykundi or Uruzgan Province===
On 8 June 2006 the United Nations quoted Gizab District as still being in Daykundi Province
http://193.194.138.190/huricane/huricane.nsf/view01/5D75CF314F0C8AA7C1257187002F10CD?opendocument
Skinsmoke 11:51, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gizab District 

message: On 8 June 2006 the United Nations quoted Gizab District as still being in Daykundi Province
http://193.194.138.190/huricane/huricane.nsf/view01/5D75CF314F0C8AA7C1257187002F10CD?opendocument
Skinsmoke 11:51, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Daykundi or Uruzgan Province

message: Changed some decidedly non - NPOV bits, including mention of the supposed 'exaggeration' of the scale of the 'so called' Battle of Chola in the Dutch press. Instead, it appears to have been the largest 'skirmish' of the year in Afghanistan.ck (talk) 11:21, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV changes

message: Not sure why you're not accepting my comments on the inaccurate colored map at the bottom of the page, since you don't actually know what you're talking about and I do.  The simple and unalterable fact is that Nesh (the blue-colored district on the map) is not now and NEVER HAS BEEN part of Oruzgan province.  I keep trying to point this out to you, but you insist on keeping your inaccurate map.  Unless you are an expert on Afghanistan, like I am, I ask you to explain your apparently relentless quest for inaccuracy.  What is going on?  Why do you insist on keeping inaccuracies?  Please explain yourself, or get someone here with more authority.  Are you too stubborn to admit when you're wrong, at the expense of readers seeking accurate data?  
thanks, R  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 169.252.4.21 (talk) 08:25, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: more non-NPOV changes

message: I find it very puzzling that, despite the lede giving several alternate spellings, the current standard and most popular "Uruzgan" is not among them.  Given that "Uruzgan" gets three times more hits on Google and GoogleBooks than "Orūzgān", I submit we move the page and any similarly-spelled categories/pages to the "Uruzgan" spelling.  Objections? MatthewVanitas (talk) 19:31, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change spelling to "Uruzgan"? 

message: Aflis, yes, please be up to date. This is Pakistan we are talking about. The term "tribal" is what is used by Pakistanis, so social sciences don't get to decide what the term is. Please read about Federal and Provincial tribal areas here and here. You can also consult the constitution of Pakistan here. Please don't revert what you don't know about. Rui Gabriel Correia (talk) 10:32, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I won't even try to convince you that your position is wrong. --Aflis (talk) 12:31, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tribe  

message: Please also consult this. You might also want to compare the article on Clans. Regards, Rui Gabriel Correia (talk) 15:12, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: All this is roughly a generation behind the state of the art. It illustrates why so few people from the academic world collaborate with WP. --Aflis (talk) 16:09, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: If all of them are as bad as you, working so utterly unprofessionally, then perhaps it is a good thing. Rui Gabriel Correia (talk) 19:00, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia guideline on the use of the word "tribe"