lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Arnhem

message: Audrey Hepburn was born in Brussels, Belgium, but spent her teen years in Arnhem during WWII. I believe there are several memorial sites commemorating her. Isn't this worth mentioning under "notable people?"
Thanks for the suggestion, I've added her. Stefan Jansen 21:42, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Audrey Hepburn? 
Talk:Michał Wiśniowiecki

message: I am looking for better genealogy of Wisniowiecki family. The best I found so far is:
 SKRÓCONY WYWÓD PRZODKÓW: MICHAŁ KORYBUT WIŚNIOWIECKI.
1 Michał Tomasz Korybut Wiśniowiecki ur.31-07-1640 zm.10-11-1673 król Polski
2 Jeremi Michał Korybut Wiśniowiecki ur. 1612 zm. 20-08-1651 wojewoda ruski
3 Gryzelda Konstancja Zamoyska
4 Michał Wiśniowiecki zm. ok. 1616 starosta owrucki
5 Raina Wiśniowiecka; Mohylanka zm. 1619
6 Tomasz Zamoyski ur. 1594 zm. 1638 kanclerz wielki koronny
7 Katarzyna Ostrogska zm. 1642
8 Michał Wiśniowiecki ur. 1529 zm. 1584 kasztelan bracławski
9 Halszka Zenowiczówna zm. 1594
10 Jeremi Mohyła hospodar mołdawski
12 Jan Zamoyski ur. 1545 zm. 1605 hetman wielki koronny
13 Barbara Tarnowska ur. ok. 1566 zm. 1610
16 Aleksander Wiśniowiecki zm. 1555 starosta rzeczycki
17 Katarzyna Skorucianka zm. po 1568
32 Michał Zbaraski-Wiśniowiecki zm. po 1516 namiestnik bracławski
from .  Need better. Tnx, --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 19:37, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:21st Century Medicine

message: Please list your important staff in this article, not on separate pages. 
Wikipedia's policy is ho hold separate articles for notable persons only. 
The motto is "Wikipedia is not Yellow Pages". 
If a particular person is notable for his achievements, e.g., makes a breakthrough invention, then the article is gladly welcome. Simply holding a position in a company is not of notability.  
Thank you. Mikkalai 19:49, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: This article was listed on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion in accordance with the deletion policy on 22:17, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Votes for deletion results 
Talk:Gangtok

message: "...the channels available throughout India are also available here." The "here" should be specified or this sentence should be removed, I think Isjee594 (talk) 15:15, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Here 

message: The audio clip right now does not have the right pronunciation.
An authentic local pronunciation of the name of the city is needed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sudarshanhs (talk • contribs) 18:08, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improve audio clip 

message: This article doesn't seem to be quite up to the current featured article criteria.  The history section doesn't seem to be quite complete (nothing noteworthy happened after 1997?), and some of the information/statistics (particularly civic administration, utitilies, and education) are outdated.  If these issues are not addressed, a featured article review may eventually happen. Hog Farm  Bacon 04:46, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with Hog Farm's concerns above. The history section ends in 1997 (and has huge gaps in coverage), civic administration needs update their representatives for the latest election, and the transport sections should be updated with new information and merging this information together should be considered per WP:OVERSECTION. Is anyone interested in fixing up this article? If not, it might be nominated at WP:FAR. Z1720 (talk) 15:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:URFA/2020]]
Talk:Chasse-galerie

message: Why would such a stamp cause a stir? --Menchi 20:29, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This link should not point to a disambiguation page.--Horizon Sunset (talk) 01:08, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't have time to dig into it today, but it was originally Faust. I've changed it back.--Auric talk 15:16, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Melman]] of "sea also"
Talk:Los Angeles Angels

message: Hello I just wanted to know I changed the headline to Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim can someone please change the title to Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim because I called the front office and they said it was Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim. Please do not be angry. Thanks
:Hello, IPv6 editor. What you did qualifies as original research, so it isn't verifiable and can't be used on article pages. O.N.R. (talk) 22:45, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:   Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim 

message: :Category:Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim players has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Natg 19 (talk) 20:42, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: [[:Category:Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim players]] has been nominated for discussion

message: It seems to me that the team name should be merged in the infobox as "Los Angeles Angels (1961–1965, 2016-present)" instead of having two separate lines. Similar to the LA Rams' infobox, "Los Angeles Rams (1946–1994, 2016–present)" Orange2001 ABC (talk) 18:18, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name in infobox 

message: The film featured the California Angels, I believe this is worth mentioning in the Popular Culture section 2600:4041:4A2:8F00:E160:28CB:ED83:9652 (talk) 03:10, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed 67.150.0.30 (talk) 06:14, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Angels in the Outfield 

message: The team primary logo is the same as the cap logo you have here. The Angels you list is the Jersey script. 142.198.55.158 (talk) 00:17, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Team Primary Logo
Talk:Canneto di Caronia fires

message: This page doens't simply deserve to be present in the wiki, imho. As i did in it.wiki - where it has been traduced from english with google language tools - i propose it for deleting, since  is a colletion of half-heard voices which doesn't come to attain a significance. Same goes for Caronia. --Balubino 21:09, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Terex Titan

message: The links are dead --ospalh (talk) 10:57, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links 

message: I could only guess what kind of tons were used.
As the truck was used in Canada for a time it's conceivable that what I've labeld short tons were really metric tons.
--ospalh (talk) 11:00, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Found a source with both types quoted so updated - BulldozerD11 (talk) 11:08, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  What kind of tons 

message: In the lead section it says "operating capacity of 320 tons", in history it says
"it hauled loads of over 360 tons". How can that be? --ospalh (talk) 11:01, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thats becacase rated capacities are partially based on volume and different rocks have differing densities& bulking factors, (hence special bulk bodies being used for coal).  Real capacity is not always the manufactures specified figure, and you can load more on but risk increasing wear & tear rates. Tyres are the weak point hence the Titan having 3 axles as technology was not as advanced at that time & why the modern Cat 798B & Liebherrs can cary more, ad it weighs less with only two axles. - BulldozerD11 (talk) 11:08, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Max. load?
Talk:Blender (Collective Soul album)

message: from VfD:
I don't feel that this notable enough to warrant its own page. It should perhaps be deleted and the contents merged into a page dedicated to the band. See also Dosage. TigerShark 21:29, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Revolutionary song

message: "the end of the first verse already show the propaganda part"
The first verse is: "The bunch of little bears happily sleeping,". Shouldn't that be about the penultimate verse (of the quotation): "Our dreams were hushed away by the grim despotism,"? Asking because it is possible some meaning was lost in the translation. gcbirzan 21:53, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article is off to a good start, however much of the content needs expanding upon. China, Iran, and Cuba are discussed in relative detail, however each of the other sections are too short. More content with explanation of who wrote the songs and why they are revolutionary. - Mayacaps (talk) 17:45, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content Discrepancies 

message: Many citations are lacking complete information or are not completely relevant to the information being cited. The information linked to the 10th citation is too closely paraphrased and should be edited.  Annamberg07 (talk) 17:45, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations 

message: Please remove or edit the psychology part of the wiki article.Bicarden (talk) 17:46, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit Psychology Section of the Article 

message: Was this meant to demonstrate left wing/workers revolutions? Many of the revolutions exemplified were socialist/communist revolutions and doesn't really include right wing/centrist revolutions (Nazi Germany, Spain, Argentina, Nicaragua, etc.) if so, could this be recharacterized as the role of music in socialist revolutions?
The categorization of the revolutions should stay consistent. So I would choose to categorize them by country or by time period. Bvwrigle (talk) 17:46, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Political Bias in the article 

message: Consider reviewing information in section "China" and add citations where needed. 
Emmyminer (talk) 17:47, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations Needed  

message: Could more detail be added to the French Revolution section about the date of the cited revolution, as well as the fact that "La Marseillaise" remains the French national anthem? I feel that would be significant. Aurgallagher (talk) 17:47, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  French Revolution section 

message: This article contains sections for North Korea and the Russian Revolution without including information on these sections. These areas should be elaborated upon or removed. Cawalker18 (talk) 17:48, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relevant Content 

message: The redirect Political song has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  — Bilorv (talk) 20:02, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Political song]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2005-01-17/Features

message: Hello,
It's Kardashev scale, not Kardashev Scale. I twould also be good to have a link to FAC in the article. Otherwise, looks good. —Ben Brockert (42) UE News 22:32, Jan 11, 2005 (UTC)
:Or Everyking will go in there and edit it himself, despite the fact that it's in your user space. —Ben Brockert (42) UE News 00:11, Jan 12, 2005 (UTC)
It's a decent start, even if you're not satisfied with it yet. At any rate, the effort to give the article some kind of theme is a good idea, whether or not this theme is the right one. Putting a theme together when dealing with disparate subjects can be a challenging art. There's still time left in the coming week to see what happens; events may make you reconsider what to write about.
Additional thoughts about covering FACs generally, not directed to any topic in particular. Articles that undergo significant change after nomination, or overcome major objections, will probably be of more interest than those that are slam dunks one way or the other. Also, if an article has been a Collaboration of the week before, that's an extra source to look for something interesting to say about it and its development. --Michael Snow 04:03, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Talk:National Book Award

message: The National Book Award is given to "living authors" however, I wonder how Flannery O'Conner won in 1972... she had passed away nearly a year before.  Geopence 00:55, 30 March 2005‎
:I've never seen anything that says the author has to be alive. They just award to books published in the prior year. -- Stbalbach 17:21, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Living authors 

message: The name of it "National Book Awards". See the website. I imagine a singular award would called a "National Book Award", but this article is about the awards in general, all of them. Anyone see a problem with renaming? -- Stbalbach 17:21, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename to "Awards" 

message: I notice most of the award listings for this artcile start in 1950 and run to 2006 except Poetry which starts in 2006 and runs BACK to 1950.  I was in a pedantic mood and was about to fix the poetry listing when it ocurred to me that maybe there's some WIKI rule about this and that all the other listings should be changed.  Is there?  Current to past or past to current?  68.252.236.103 02:05, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please go ahead. "Oldest first" is how Wikipedia is structurally arranged on many levels. -- Stbalbach 02:17, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year Date Order? 

message: This criticism section is truncated, with quotations from articles that appeared in a 10-day period in 2011. A much broader history of criticism of the awards is needed and even a criticism of the critics who made the statements included here.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Haugenbraum (talk • contribs) 16:15, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes indeed. I have highlighted that problem in a crude way that may get some attention, rewriting the first line: The NBAs were criticized during the last cycle. --P64 (talk) 21:58, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism 

message: Except for the two lifetime awards that are covered only in this article, all discussion of award winners and finalists on the five Talk pages listed at the top. This includes NBAward-related discussion of the articles about authors and books, such as their categorization (:Category:National Book Award winners, and so on). --P64 (talk) 17:52, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Winners and finalists 
File talk:Poland First To Fight.jpg

message: Where can I obtain a First to Fight poster?
:From time to time they publish a series of War newspapers (name may vary from country to country, in Poland the series was published under the title Gazety wojenne. It's a licensed series of magazines with reproductions of WWII newspapers and one or two posters per issue. Probably you could also obtain one in one of the Polish museums in the west - for instance in London or Rappersville, although I'm not sure they sell such posters there. Halibutt 03:12, Jan 12, 2005 (UTC)
:I saw in in the Muzeum Powstania Warszawskiego (there the caption sais Marek Żuławski, 1942).-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  15:41, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

message: The correct poster is:
-- Миборовский U|T|C|M|E|Chugoku Banzai! 02:13, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  This poster is factually incorrect ;)
Talk:Methyl orange

message: if someone cares to take the trouble, this article needs to reformatted to conform to the other chemical-related articles. Shaggorama 23:13, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  wikify 

message: The text says that the modified methyl orange's colours are grey and green, but the diagram shows colourless (?) and purple...? 86.148.60.205 20:14, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistency? 

message: That isn't the correct structure of methyl orange there! When it acts as a base, the H+ does not add itself onto the O- in the SO3 group, but instead into one of the 'middle' N's, causing a shuffle-round of elecrons converting the non-sulphate arene into a cyclohexdiene group and placing a + charge on the 'outmost' N. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Luke1001 (talk • contribs) 18:31, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The current chemical structure is correct.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:25, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrectness 

message: what colour is Methyl orange in an neutral solution? --I.W 20:59, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yellow, as pH 7 is out of the range of its changes and so is in its closest colour, which is 4.4, being yellow.--82.0.164.177 17:32, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  neutral 

message: The article states that:
:an indicator consisting of a solution of methyl orange and xylene cyanol, changes from grey to green as the solution becomes more basic
However, the color shown in the box illustration is purple. Ileanadu (talk) 18:21, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grey or Purple for Xylene solution? 

message: At present, the article says:
:Methyl orange has a pHa of 3.47 in water at 
However I think pHa is intended to be pKa. Should we change?  Buzzbo (talk) 23:12, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  pKa not pHa
Talk:Electro-Motive Diesel

message: We claim the North American market is essentially divided 70-30 between only two competitors, GE Transportation and EMD. 
I would like to ask those in the know if this really is true still in 2023. Isn't Siemens delivering locomotives to North American operators, for instance?
CapnZapp (talk) 08:22, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Market share
Talk:Black moon

message: This is one of many not-so-important fringe articles, but okay.  However, this is inconsistent:
"When February is without full moon, then the preceding January and the following March have two full moons."
"When February is without new moon, then the preceding January or December and the following March or April have two new moons."
Either the first or the second is true.  I can't see how both could possibly be correct.  The time from one new moon to next new moon must on average equal the time from one full moon to the next full moon, mustn't it?  Fomalhaut76 (talk) 08:38, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The claims are cited so you have no choice really but to verify the citations. Perhaps that will clear up the issue? --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 11:01, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

text: Both are true, but not in the same year surrounding the same February. The point is that January and March are long enough to have more than one lunation, February is short enough to have less than one lunation. It can happen that February has no full moon or that it has not new moon. When that happens January and March must each have two of the phases that are missing from the intervening February. Chi And H (talk) 14:34, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: All of which raises the obvious questionso what? Looks like wp:trivia to me. Delete? 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 20:18, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: wp:trivia doesn´t seem to cover the case of a whole article. To me it is not obvious that the above "inconsistency" shows this topic to be trivial. The black moon topic does sometimes make it into the media, similar to the blue moon and the supermoon. As an astronomer I find that trivial, but that is subjective. Keep. Chi And H (talk) 05:19, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

text: Ah, well spotted. December and April were removed in mobile edit earlier this year, in one instance and not the other.Chi And H (talk) 20:04, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistency
Talk:Rising crescent moon

message: References?  This sounds as if it were invented by the anonymous wikipedian who started the article.  And besides, when the Sun is high in the sky, the horns of the crescent moon always point down, and when the Sun is below the horizon, the horns always point up, so this happens every month, not every 7 to 14 months. Eric Forste 23:39, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Accounting scholarship

message: :Merge - should be merged with Accountancy What123 18:09, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Keep - although accounting scolarship contributes to accounting it is not accounting. Neither would most people who practice accounting care about scholarship. Perhaps a cross-link with accounting would be more appropriate. --Mig77 13:43, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Merge: half of this article appears to be about academia in general. The whole accounting academia section seems a bit superficial in any respect. The types and areas of research are just lists containing topics which are more likely to be searched for themselves. Danrees 08:15, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Keep We don't even have an article an accounting, only a redirect to Accountancy which refers to the profession, not the academic discipline. JQ 07:27, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Keep As stated on accounting, that article is already too large. --57.68.49.4 16:10, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge +tag

message: This is a pro-forma nomination, without the usual implicit Delete vote on my part.  The article in question was rewritten and renamed during the debate under its former title, Professor in accounting.  My principal concerns are that this article 
* should not, if worthy of retention, be under the cloud of resembling speedy-deletable articles that "have the same content as a VfD-deleted article", and 
* conversely, should not undercut the principle that renaming during VfD should not be a viable avenue for avoiding deletion of an otherwise doomed VfD-candidate. 
--Jerzy(t) 23:37, 2005 Jan 11 (UTC)
*Keep. The problem with the Professor in accounting article was only that the information was packaged as a job description. The content as such is an encyclopedic topic, even though the new article still needs some work. Martg76 00:18, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: from VfD:

message: The following statement is flawed, "The theoretical underpinnings of both accounting and finance are derived from economics."  Accounting is not derived from economics, and on many occasions the two are in opposition.  The classical example is that accounting ignores opportunity cost, which is a fundamental of economics.  In addition, accounting - particularly financial account - is shaped by the law (usually tax law) such that the established rules of economics no longer apply.  Furthermore, accounting makes arbitrary distinctions which have no economic basis, for example distinguishing between capital leases and operating leases.  I recommend deleting the sentence, unless the consensus of the profession disagrees with me. Rugz (talk) 18:31, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Robert the Bruce old

message: Regarding the comment about the "morass of flamewars" in the circumcision-related areas of WP, it is my distinct impression (whose accuracy can, I'm sure, be investigated) that the circumcision related areas of WP were relatively quiet until Robert's arrival several months ago.  Since that time, I admit, they've been a morass, but in the context of what I perceive the case to be, Delirium's comment makes little sense to me (it seems to excuse someone's behavior on the grounds that, since they have turned an area of Wikipedia into a complete mess, they can be forgiven for being messy in it).  Perhaps I'm misinformed about the situation, however.  I will say that I attempted very informally to work productively with Robert Brookes (or at least get him to stop calling Theresa names) and was spoken to unpleasantly as a result.  Shortly after my interactions with him, he disappeared (and Robert the Bruce mysteriously appeared at the same time) -- perhaps he sensed the heat would soon be on.  I would therefore encourage something to be done with Robert...if it's to be mediation, then on with it, but my experiences with him suggest to me that his obsession with his POV will make mediation almost certainly fruitless. I know he feels that the other side in this debate also pushes its POV here (I am sure he's right) but I don't think that's an excuse for his behavior. Jwrosenzweig 00:29, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Reply to Delirium

message: Could Exploding Boy suggest why he thinks Robert the Bruce might be Robert Blair? I find it hard to believe that RtB would want to argue with himself. - Jakew 19:34, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  May also be [[User: Robert Blair]].