Talk:Baroness Orczy

message: "Her novel Lady Molly of Scotland Yard was the first to feature a female detective as the main character" is not correct.  The lady investigates, Patricia Craig and Mary Cadogan, (Oxford 1981) lists several from the 19th century.  I've amended it to an early example".  Richard Pinch 21:43, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Something must be wrong here:
--Sandycx (Talk) 13:39, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "left Hungary" and then "lived in Budapest"?

message: Would someone who knows care to add the pronunciation of her name - please? Awien 23:16, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciation

message: I moved the following here from the main page: "From a passage in her famed Scarlet Pimpernel it is apparent that she was a virulent anti-semite."
I do not think this can be left in without some sort of citation. I will alert those at Antisemitism. --Thehalfone (talk) 15:18, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree with removal as I said there. --BozMo talk 15:48, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Reverted - tag with a citation needed tag. Have you read the book? Albatross2147 (talk) 11:50, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course I have read the book. Using a stereotype prevalent at the time doesn't make you an antisemite but it might make you thoughtless. Anyway your OR judgement on the passage is OR you need to find a notable commentator who asserts AS--BozMo talk 06:11, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Antisemite 

message: I have just started reading the Scarlet Pimpernel and was interested in the author.  I did not want to learn the identity of the SP via Wikipedia rather than through the joy of reading.  I have removed the reference so others are not disappointed.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.97.48.71 (talk) 21:08, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I reverted your edit per WP:SPOILER. This is an encyclopedia, and encyclopedias will have spoilers by their very nature. Wyatt Riot (talk) 05:57, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It can also be argued that 'decades after the novels were published' people are likely to have some idea that 'the given hero or chief narrator character' is likely to be the person using the 'masquerading name' (as a generic title). Jackiespeel (talk) 18:21, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed Spoiler

message: In The Times 26 MArch 1908 Baroness Orczy and Mr Montagu thank those who have supported them in the recent court case decided against them. To what does this refer? Jackiespeel (talk) 17:24, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Baroness O's court case

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Emma Orczy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060329100020/http://www.blackmask.com:80/ to http://www.blackmask.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:57, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Eldorado? DCDuring (talk) 15:24, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing ''Scarlet Pimpernel'' work? 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Consensus to move. (non-admin closure) BegbertBiggs (talk) 15:31, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Emma Orczy →  – This is the WP:COMMONNAME, that she published as, and is nearly always referred to as. It was the original article title until moved without discussion in 2007 Johnbod (talk) 02:33, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

text: *  is one of you planning to open a discussion at the article talk page? Marcocapelle (talk) 19:26, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

text: *:  I actually find that the article is fine where it stands now, and I therefore do not intend to request its renaming. I merely suggest copying this discussion there for memory. Place Clichy (talk) 00:53, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 29 September 2020 

message: While I supported the article move above, I'm puzzled as to why we're breaking our usual practice and not listing her full name in the first line (see MOS:FULLNAME). I edited the article to conform to our usual style, as I have done with thousands of articles, but it was reverted to a style that we don't usually use. Not sure why we're making an exception here. There is no requirement for the first line to conform to the article title, as quite clearly stated in the MOS.  Care to explain your objections to following the MOS for this particular article? -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:09, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Bolding six first names is certainly not the usual way we do it. Johnbod (talk) 13:41, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: We list and bold the full name. Always. Please show me where in the MOS it says we shouldn't just because someone happens to have a lot of names. -- Necrothesp (talk) 20:59, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: First line