Talk:Israr Ahmed

message: Why should the Saudi's ban Dr. Israr Ahmad from entering the country? The Saudi Dollars is fueling his movement and anti-shia sentiments. He is just another puppet of the wahabi's.
Younus, this is another article that is NOT NEUTRAL. It is adulatory of Dr. Ahmed. I imagine that there are quite a few people who DON'T like him, and have viewpoints that should be represented. Zora 11:38, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: My comment is that if he is a respected scholar all over the world, can you give more information about him? What is more important are his viewpoints and interpertation of Islam. Because this doesn't really tell me why he's important or respected.
My question is that, is Dr. Israr Sahib's interpertation of Islam respected by all Muslims in gerneral? or only by the certain sect that he belongs to? For example what does an average Sunni or a Shi'a consider him to be? And do they agree with his interpertations? (anybody can answer the question, if they know the answer)
Also, the comment about him not being banned from Saudi Arabia, sounds quite random. I would like to request to explain why exactly someone might think that he is not allowed to enter Saudi Arabia?
'umair
He was a very deceptive personality 
Bold text  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.59.80.153 (talk) 05:59, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question and a comment 

message: Dear Wikipedia.
The imformation you hold regarding Dr. Israr Ahmed views on shiaism are not true. He has never been involved attacking shias. I have tried to rectified it however somebody keeps on re-instating to wrong information. Therefore I would like to bring to your notice that information needs to be edited. Dr. Israr has written various books for promoting unity between shias and sunnis. He is an authentic mullah of the muslim world and his known world and his thus not a scholar. Somebody in your members list with his/her narrow vision keep on putting wrong information which is sending a message of hate which is not good.
Therefore you can carry your own research and if you find that he has extreme views against shias and be it.
Thanks
Yasir
:The someone is me. And the alleged "wrong information" comes from a reputable scholar, Vali Nasr. If you have sourced information from a reputable source contradicting Nasr we can put in something about "observers disagree over Israr Ahmed's stance on Shia," but you cannot delete sourced material as it is a violation of wikipedia policy. --BoogaLouie (talk) 17:22, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Position on Shiaism 

message: The Critics section is in desperate need of citations and references to authentic sources since critique is always the most controversial part of an article. I suggest that some one provide references from reliable sources for each critique, because the complete section comes under "Biased opinion" as per BLP: "If someone appears to be pushing an agenda or a biased point of view, insist on reliable third-party published sources and a clear demonstration of relevance to the person's notability".Farqis 11:19, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Critics Section 

message: I have tried and will try to fix the article. Much of it was verbatim quotes from pro-Israr Ahmed websites with the source not given. There are a great many anon POV edits both pro and anti IA. --BoogaLouie (talk) 23:42, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Big Mess

message: I am the one who took hours to add links to all the books of Dr Israr Ahmad Sahib here from www.tanzeem.org and www.scholaris.com. Why these all links have been removed? Did you I do something which is against the policy of Wikipedia or Tanzeem-e-Islami? Please let me know.
Javaids
: I have spent an hour restoring and cleaning up your links. --BoogaLouie (talk) 20:57, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: But why?--89.108.1.154 (talk) 15:40, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: So they are readable and not a mess. (PS, I am not "required to give an explanation for [my] actions" but have anyway.) --BoogaLouie (talk) 16:06, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Please Read This and Answer Me 

message: The info box is POV too but I don't know what to replace Khawarji with. Islamist? Deobandi? 
--BoogaLouie (talk) 23:45, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: infobox

message: I hope the article is now rewritten enough and balanced enough to have the tags revmoved. Any objections? --BoogaLouie (talk) 22:36, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Remove tags

message: i think after listining and reading of Dr Israr, s  Lecture, He should expose himselve completely without any fear that who is muslim & who is not muslim because without this, Munafiqs will won 100%.    Muhammad Aamer Manager Finance 20 years of experience of Shia Suni Letrature. Thanks.
Its my pation to listen all speeches of Dr Israr Ahmed. God help him.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.99.184.103 (talk) 14:31, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: I have removed the section, I find it as absolutely one of the most biased things read on Wikipedia. Please remember Wikipedia is not a website where you can write up your personal views into the pages. If you want to bring up the section back, please write it in a more informative way giving the whole account of the incident and not just the reactions of one particular community. Also there was a link posted up in response to his comments, along with that this was written:
"A reply was made to him by Shiekh Amaar Nakshwani in a more proper islamic way without any curse and bad language giving references from quran and hadiths against his statement"
I find that stupidly biased and a personal attack as Israr Ahmed did not use any 'curse' or 'bad language'. You're required to use a NPOV. --Yu5uF (talk) 15:51, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shia/Sunni Controversy removed 

message: An image used in this article, File:Dr-israr-ahmed.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 17:41, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Dr-israr-ahmed.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 13:39, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Israr ahmed.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Israr Ahmed. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080329114424/http://islam.islamabad.net:80/ to http://islam.islamabad.net/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100415051521/http://geo.tv:80/4-14-2010/62939.htm to http://www.geo.tv/4-14-2010/62939.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:50, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Israr Ahmed. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160320020504/http://tanzeem.info/webapps/tip_dnnweb/Organization/TheFounder.aspx to http://tanzeem.info/webapps/tip_dnnweb/Organization/TheFounder.aspx
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160320022000/http://tanzeem.info/webapps/tip_dnnweb/Organization/TheAmeer.aspx to http://tanzeem.info/webapps/tip_dnnweb/Organization/TheAmeer.aspx
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111004224132/http://www.khilafahmovement.org/israrahmed.htm to http://www.khilafahmovement.org/israrahmed.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160320020956/http://tanzeem.info/webapps/tip_dnnweb/Organization/Background.aspx to http://tanzeem.info/webapps/tip_dnnweb/Organization/Background.aspx
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160320023217/http://tanzeem.info/webapps/tip_dnnweb/FAQs.aspx to http://tanzeem.info/webapps/tip_dnnweb/FAQs.aspx
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110927150815/http://arabnews.com/world/article43026.ece to http://arabnews.com/world/article43026.ece
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:58, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:51, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:24, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion 

message: HELLO,THERE IS ONE MISTAKE THAT IVE NOTICED IN THE SECTION ENTITLED AS "LITERATURE AND PHILOSOPHY".THERE IT IS WRITTEN THAT DR.ISRAR SAID THAT THE MAJORITY'S DECISION COULD BE REJECTED BY THE HEAD OF THE STATE.HOWEVER THIS IS NOT TRUE,IVE HEARD HIM SAYING IT MULTIPLE TIMES THAT THESE ISSUES CAN BE DECIDED BY MUTUAL CONSULTATION.HE MADE IT VERY CLEAR THAT THE POWERS OF THE HEAD OF THE STATE AND THE OBLIGATION TOWARDS THE DECISIONS TAKEN BY THE PARLIAMENT CAN ALSO BE DECIDED BY MUTUAL CONSULTATION.SOURCE- YOUTUBE LECTURED DELIVERED BY DR ISRAR HIMSELF.
<ref> https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Israr_Ahmed&oldid=1153183648/ref> Toshibazabih (talk) 14:38, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Callmemirela 🍁 19:09, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 11 May 2023