lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Origins of the Koran

message: The article varies between using Koran & Quran. I think the best solution is to use Qur'an as this is the spelling used by wikipedia's Islam article and is becoming the standard form generally. Of course, when quoting the book we should use whatever term is used there. Ashmoo 05:52, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Koran vs. Qur'an

message: These are the reasons I removed these bits:
falsehood perpetrated  to state this as fact is quite POV.
by advocates of Islam  aren't advocates of Islam commonly called 'Muslims'?
who seek to hide how does the encyclopedia know that they are seeking to hide, rather than just being incorrect, indoctrinated or some other motive?
its many errors and contradictions from the general public again, the 'errors and contradictions' is what the book is trying to prove. So to state it as fact is adopting the POV of the book.
On the other hand, if the book actually says that the 'advocates of Islam seek to hide the errors...etc' than it would be good to include that, noting that it is an argument made by the book. User:CltFn, you seem to have expertise on this matter, could you provide some insight?
Regards, Ashmoo 05:51, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explanation of edits
Talk:General Currie Elementary School

message: The school's new wing was completed in 2001, not 1999. I saw the building being built, and back in 1999, they only had sand on top of it to make the ground harder for the building to be built on. Curriegrad2004 22:00, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The school's new wing was completed in 2001, not 1999. 

message: I question whether the area in the table should be Broadmore, which I've never heard of. Broadmoor on the other hand is fairly specific to the subdivision and shopping centre, to my mind. It's been quite a while since I lived in Richmond, so I will leave the correction to another. John Spraggs 09:40, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broadmore
Talk:English language in Southern England

message: Why does the Sussex Dialect page previously at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sussex_dialect redirect to this page, which is inferior in content? Adecastick (talk) 11:46, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I second this. The previous page had a lot more information, was full of citations, and provided much more information, especially on the unique grammatical features of the dialect and its literary history. I can't understand why it's been replaced with this page. Antonine (talk) 20:20, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Update: Having done a bit of digging, it looks like an individual user went on a one-person edit crusade to delete the individual articles for dialects in southern England and replace them all with redirects to higher level summary articles like this one. I've now reverted those deletions but, in fairness, many of the articles have quality issues which could do with addressing. That being said, the same is true of this article itself. Antonine (talk) 22:58, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Sussex Dialect
Talk:Danny Barker

message: I've removed the reference to Barker playing with the Louisiana Repertory Jazz Ensemble, which he was not usually with. I don't understand why this would be put in, especially when Barkers' own band and groups and venues he was especially associated with aren't mentioned. -- Infrogmation 04:55, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I am searching for a recording and / or sheet music w/ lyrics to this song, which I've been told is a Danny Barker song.  Anyone know about this?  Thanks.
heatherfrazier@hotmail.com 70.186.177.217 (talk) 14:05, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes certainly it was, recorded famously by Blu Lu and later Danny. Though you mean "Don't You Feel My Leg". -- Infrogmation (talk) 22:55, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Do You Feel My Leg?" 
Talk:Humpback Covered Bridge

message: A hump-back bridge is a class of bridges in the United Kingdom (I assume they were constructed prior to the motor vehicle, when a significant hump was not a ground clearance issue). I was rather surprised to find only an entry about one particular bridge in the US. This is definitely not a world view.
AndyCivil (talk) 22:44, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The title could be altered if other articles about hump-backed bridges located elsewhere are created.--MONGO 19:11, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a world view
Talk:Defense-independent ERA

message: This is interesting, but where are the references? -JinAZ
Here is one (it was hard to find) WilliamKF 01:12, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: $H = (H - HR) / (BFP - (HR + K + BB + HB)))
WilliamKF 17:32, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

text: I guess this is right since reaching first on error counts as an out in your batting average, so it should count positively for the pitcher. WilliamKF 00:01, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Maimonides School/to do

message: *Add more to the major events section.
*Improve the History section to show the importance of the School regarding:
**the condition of the American Jewish community at the time of the school's creation
**the reasons for the school's creation
**any opposition to the school's creation
**the role the school has played in shaping the model of Jewish dayschools in America 
**Noah Feldman's orthodox paradox
:(Based on comments by Jon513 at 12:27, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Hunter Ellis

message: This page was nominated for AFD along with a large number of others , and the closing administrator (Shanel) chose to convert all the pages listed in the article into redirects to seasons of Survivor (TV series).  In the case of Ellis, I feel that this was done improperly, as 4 of the 11 users commenting in the nomination (including the nominator) felt that Ellis's article should be kept and cleaned up, once examples of his non-Survivor notability were called to their attention.  WP:DRV states that in the case of short stubs deleted for lack of content, the best course of action is to be bold and create a new article on the subject.  Accordingly, I have done so here.  As a courtesy, please contact me before re-deleting it, particularly as a speedy of previously deleted content. -Colin Kimbrell 05:06, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If you read the afd, it was clearly not deleted for lack of content.  I've re-deleted. —Cryptic (talk) 13:13, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

text: Most people's objection on the AFD was that it dealt with him and his non-notable activites as a "Survivor" candidate, rather than the non-Survivor things that clearly marked him as notable. As such, the "delete" opinions advocated deletion due to lack of content on the areas in which he was genuinely notable, which fits the criterion pretty well.  If you'd rather drag everybody through a deletion review, though, so be it. -Colin Kimbrell 16:52, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Alternate picking

message: what's with the over-emphasis on metal? alternate picking's used in practically every form of guitar-based music. this is obviously written from a metal-fan's POV and it shows
----
i removed the expression 'or most commonly refered to as "Machine-Gunning"'. while i have heard the sound of (distorted, palm muted) alternate picked passages compared somewhat facetiously to the sound of a machine gun, i've never actually hear alternate picking termed 'machine-gunning'. as such, i don't think the claim that this is the 'most commonly' used term is justified; it's not sourced, so i've removed it. Bridies (talk) 22:14, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This is incorrect, and the bass player Victor Wooten is a prime example of this - he uses his thumb to achieve alternate picking, striking the strings with a strict up-down/down-up motion.
This article needs a severe overhaul, anyway. PCLM (talk) 20:29, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "...used only by pick users..."
Talk:Myson of Chenae

message: Wikinfo and Wikipedia will be happiest if they go their separate ways. In this case, I propose, if deleted,  to write an article on this subject, based on standard modern sources, which is entirely internal to Wikipedia. If any Wikipedian comes along and edits, inserting any information which may appear in Wikinfo, sourced to a credible source, what then happens to it will be normal editing. Septentrionalis 05:15, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The footnote-citation in the article does not make it clear exactly from which source this quote was taken: "there is a story in Plutarch, (Quaest. Rom. 84), of Myson making in winter a fork for tossing the corn, and, when Chilon wondered at it, of his justifying himself by an apposite answer; where Myson is opposed, as a Perioecian farmer, to the noble Spartan."  Perhaps whoever added the ref can clarify.  Also, I expect that the average reader would be quite mystified by the references in the footnote.  So I don't know that they are helpful.  Isokrates (talk) 15:29, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I deleted it as of 23 April 2010. I've given this page a bit of a clean-up. The reference for that story is given in the very first version of this page , but it seems a pretty vague anecdote. Singinglemon (talk) 16:00, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Place of Residence
Talk:Tax exempt status

message: Regarding the following statement in the article:
::This status is subject to a number of conditions, such as 
::* Not distributing voter guides directly in churches. (The only exception to this is the Christian Coalition of America.
Does anyone have any source for the proposition that the Christian Coalition is the "only exception" to this rule? Famspear 05:17, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Distributing voter guides
Talk:Cusp of Carabelli

message: This article should be renamed "Cusp of Carabelli" as that is by far the more common term. Evidenced by Google search: 201 for "Carabelli's tubercle", 653 for "Cusp of Carabelli". W00d 05:25, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

message: The definition of a cusp is that it is a pyramidal projection, that is a type of lobe. In turn, a lobe are centres of calcification. Carabelli however, is not a cusp. There is no dentin and root underneath. It is just made of enamel. This is the definition of a tubercle. It should thus be changed to the Tubercle of Carabelli 132.234.229.164 (talk) 01:46, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  It's not a cusp
Talk:Copyright law of France

message: Link to SACD is to an audio format, not a copyright society. Alberrosidus 05:27, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Links

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:United States copyright law which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 12:45, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: Hi all, just made some changes to bring the article more in line with other English language articles. Probably more work needed. Cheers. -VanArtevelde (talk) 18:25, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits as "clean up"
Talk:Sanma Akashiya

message: Is his daughter worth mentioning yet?andycjp (talk) 03:16, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Not known - I'm not familiar with EnWP inclusion policy. She is however safe to include in JaWP, see ja:IMARU. --Aphaia (talk) 14:18, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Daughter

message: Having watched a lot of Japanese comedy/variety over the years, Sanma is most often referred to as "Sanma-san." It's part of his name, being referred to like that. One thing about Japanese honorifics is that they're not really analogous to Western "titles" like Mr., Mrs., or Ms. Many many translations end up getting the names wrong by simply doing a one-to-one-translation from honorific to title. Someone could be referred to as -san by an equal or subordinate, but as -kun or -chan by a different person, a higher-up or someone they know better/more intimately. It's not a title. It's a much more complex dynamic. As it is, "Sanma-san" is specifically his "character" name. SalvadorZombie (talk) 04:35, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Sanma-san, not Sanma
Talk:Hanawa

message: I think Kentaro Noda is one of the owarai,comedian.Naoki Hanawa is playing Kentaro's coming days.Owarai is containing the contemporary and modern music.-----Kaori Makube 08:04, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Na Woon-gyu

message: Re:
14:15, 5 March 2006 Bobet m (→External links - cat:Korean film directors, since he never lived in South Korea)
Actually, he lived and worked in what is now South Korea, though he was originally from what is now North Korea. But since his career ended a decade and a half before Korea was divided, I agree that "Korean" is a more appropriate category for Na Woon-gyu than "South Korean." Rizzleboffin 15:17, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  South Korean or Korean?
Talk:Brooke Hogan

message: https://irvineweekly.com/brooke-hogan-is-taking-her-music-career-to-the-next-level/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8807:A700:A7E:F5B0:1C43:F9D9:2607 (talk) 20:11, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Here is a more current picture of Brooke Hogan.
Talk:Salvador Jorge Blanco

message: The neutrality of this article is in doubt - it does not appear to be presented in NPOV.  Note that I have zero dog in this fight - I found it while correcting misspellings of succeed.  Longshot14 05:54, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: 1. Marino Vinicio Castillo is NOT a drug czar, but the opposite, currently acting as Chief Deputy of The Illegal Drugs Commission, with the rank of State Secretary. He did acted, as a civil attorney, in the accusation side for the length of the criminal trial of Jorge Blanco.
You maybe mistaken. The term "drug czar" is sometimes used for an official whose job it is to counter the narcotics problem--Dudeman5685 (talk) 04:34, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grotesque distortions of the irrefutable and factual truth 
Talk:Clive Beddoe

message: I tried to add this page to :Category: Pilots but it looks like this category is being re-directed, sigh... XOttawahitech (talk) 19:11, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Pilots category? 
Talk:KTVF

message: I've been seeing Nicole Carvajal on the 6:30am newscasts.  I don't normally watch TV, I just see her on when I check in leaving work in the morning.  I take it the page info is outdated, but since I don't watch the station, I don't know for sure.
There is no such thing as investigative journalism in Fairbanks anymore, more like pr posing as journalism. Therefore, I don't expect this to be reported, so i"m positng it here rather than the article. The discussion of the FDNM article cited here claims that Mike Young is a sockpuppet for tvtv. Young owns a low budget hotel across teh street from West Valley High. as such, there is lots of doubt that he could possibly come up with the 1.1 mill to uby the statino.
Also, the passing mention of ntv in the aritcle ignores the role of Augie Hiebert, who founded the stattion and owned it for almost half a century. Cheers.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.237.34.130 (talk) 11:43, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Update needed? - August 2011
Talk:Second-order cybernetics

message: Took out so we don't have two quality standard's.
I added a bit about the origin of second-order cybernetics, and I cleaned up the page a bit, putting the external links into their own section.  I plan to add more in the near future to this page. Clockwork 22:06, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Clockwork. Added the diagram- could be improved- and a few extras. Hope you like. Took out context warning- fixed now surely?--Nick Green 03:29, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Good changes.  I improved the image a bit and made it a PNG instead of a JPEG (PNGs are better for line drawings and the like).  I still plan to add more some day... Clockwork 17:59, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

text: idk  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.139.98.217 (talk) 02:45, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quality standard's 

message: As far as I can see, the term New cybernetics is just an alternative name for second-order cybernetics, based on the work of a single author. The earlier term is much better established. RichardVeryard (talk) 10:37, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: This page is a mess at present.
I think there should be sections on:
- Mead's address to the ASC in 1967 and von Foerster's Cybernetics of Cybernetics publication.
- The various self-refential systems of SOC (Autopoeisis, Eigenforms, Objects, Conversation Theory).
- Relation to earlier cybernetics, and different views of this.
- Pickering's critique of SOC as a form of linguistic turn.
- Concerns with ethics, family therapy and design.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.52.122.128 (talk) 00:05, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  New structure? 

message: References 2 and 8 appear to be to the same book.  Would anyone care to fix this? --Brian Josephson (talk) 15:53, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: To confuse the issue more, von Foerster also has a paper (not a book) on the subject, entitled Cybernetics of Cybernetics, accessible on the web at https://cepa.info/fulltexts/1707.pdf. --Brian Josephson (talk) 16:37, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplicated reference
Talk:Akhtar Hussain Malik

message: Please cite references for this article --Seami 06:45, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Ame-no-Nuboko

message: This is, once again, a vaguely written article about a very important issue in Japanese mythology, and yet with not a single reference. Does anyone who actually owns a book know where this information came from? Or should I just nuke it from orbit and start all over again? Duende-Poetry (talk) 22:47, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Technically Not An Orphan, But...

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. No objections WP:RMNOMIN (closed by non-admin page mover) Lightoil (talk) 14:08, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Amenonuhoko →  – I believe it is the convention to use hyphens or spaces in Japanese titles to split up the words for ease of use Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (talk to the cutest Wikipedian) 19:24, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 28 September 2023 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Polyamorph (talk) 09:41, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Ame-no-Nuhoko →  – On the Japanese wiki page the spear is called 天沼矛（あめのぬぼこ) = Ame-no-Nuboko. This page name is Ame-no-Nuhoko. So maybe it should be renamed to Ame-no-Nuboko since that is the correct name. Artanisen (talk) 05:50, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

text: Support as per nom Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (talk to the cutest Wikipedian) 08:23, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 29 October 2023
Talk:The Wreck of the Titan: Or, Futility

message: Hello, it seems to be difficult to find on the internet the text of the original novel of 1898. An altered version of 1912, after the sinking of the Titanic, is of course much less interesting when it comes to analysing the actual similarities between the 1898 novel and the 1912 real desaster. - This article is based on the 1912 version; can we improve that? Ziko (talk) 16:49, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree with this 100 percent. Definitely a conflation of the original 1898 and the post-Titanic revision. Jjazz76 (talk) 00:07, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original novel
Talk:Hierotheos the Thesmothete

message: This page really needs to be renamed. It is not about the person named in the title but is a history of Christianity in Athens. I have no idea how to do that other than cut and paste into a new page. If anyone else knows how to do that more effectively (and probably delete this page in the meantime) then I'll do some more cleanup afterwards. JGF Wilks 07:13, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I am going to make this into an article on the person and eliminate the rest of the material.  Majoreditor 02:09, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: IMHO it can come off of the Cleanup page.  It still needs improvement but is a solid start-class article, given the limited information on the subject. Thanks, Majoreditor 02:22, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: I've finished my edits and am reclassifying this article as start-Class. Majoreditor 03:34, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article is now Start-Class 

message: What is a Thesmothete? --Error 15:48, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Thesmothete
Talk:Ferdinand Sauerbruch

message: The article on iatrogenesis has a link to this article and mentions that Dr. Sauerbruch became demented and performed unnecessary surguries, as was noted by his colleagues. If this is true, it should be mentioned in this article. If not, then the iatrogenesis article needs correction.
128.12.75.130 07:19, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sankei Shimbun

message: There is something strange here; in Asahi Shimbun it's said that Sankei Shimbun is one of the 5 greater newspapers; but in this article it says that it's the 6th. Mauricio Kanno 04:02, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Chunichi Shimbun's circulation is higher than Sankei's, but the latter is considered a major since Chunichi is regional.--Julián Ortega - drop me a message 13:48, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 6th or one of 5?

message: This page may have to be protected, again. The history page shows repeated attempts to vandalize it by IP addresses. Historiador (talk) 08:18, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Protection, again?

message: The political alignment section is not a place to add "Japanese nationalism" then link to one 14-year-old article in a policy journal. It's a sensitive topic. If your sources are better than Reuters, AFP and AP, which all, in the past few years, have called Sankei "conservative", then they should appear before that label. Currently, the "right-wing" label is sourced from an English-language Japanese newspaper and a think tank piece. Those sources do not deserve to sit above the world's major wire services.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.181.23.211 (talk) 17:01, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The Sankei Shimbun is a nationalist media outlet. However, since there is room for dispute, I will not specify it in "Infobox".--삭은사과 (talk) 19:16, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Political Alignment Section Should Only Include Strong Sources