lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Elizabeth Bouvia

message: Where to start? 
Where was this article cut and pasted from? somebody's term paper? it clearly wasn't originally written for wikipedia. (e.g. "see separate handout") Are there copyright issues?
A lot of the language is POV. For example:
"The ADD uses a slippery slope argument (see separate handout) that amounts to coercion on Elizabeth and others like her to accept their fate despite the hardships that living causes them. A quality of life approach would reply to these groups that it is up to individuals to decide their own quality of life and to coerce them into living is to violate a constitutionally guaranteed right to self-determination."
Byset 21:11, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 2006 comment

message: This page is ableist because it doesn’t record the fact that the disabled community opposed Bouvia’s starvation. I tried to add that information & the edits were immediately deleted. 2601:18C:505:2890:292C:C887:FE81:6D10 (talk) 22:49, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ableism
Talk:Photonic integrated circuit

message: I've removed numerous sources that are in non-English languages and that are simply not relevant. Statistics on this page also lack any type of source, and I can't find any sources to correct or back up anything here. Article likely requires an electrical expert. DeliriousWolf (talk) 11:26, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article still requires serious work. 

message: This article need some serious work. There are may statements which vague or would not be generally held to be true. While it needs not
to be overly technical the simplification must not create inaccuracy. Since it is currently being edited I get to it later  and clean it up. Dtneilson 02:17, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article needs work
Talk:End Around (submarine tactic)

message: Due to having no sources, it could be safe to assume that this is a hoax. Going to research to see if it is indeed a hoax. Kirbanzo (talk) 15:41, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It would not be safe to assume so.  Feel free to do some research before adding hoax tags to articles. Scr★pIronIV 19:10, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potential hoax
Talk:Spinner (Blade Runner)

message: The fact that the press kit said "conventional internal combustion, jet and anti-gravity" proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that the studio PR people didn't know jack.
:In other words, they know about as little as Three 6 Mafia about riding in a spinner. --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 19:39, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

message: There is no usage and little reference to Spinners outside of the Blade Runner film. I suggest that the two be merged, perhaps in a section called Technology in the Blade Runner universe.Yserbius (talk) 15:09, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger Proposal
Talk:Raking fire

message: I failed to give a reason when reverting this change.  The "she" in the original copy refers to the ship, I believe, not the Admiral.  Therefore it should remain "she" and not be changed to "he".  Quartic (talk) 10:53, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  My finger trouble on revert of 22 September 2010 

message: I've only just had time to glance at this JSTOR article, but it mentions that raking fire was less useful because the ship firing would receive more damage than she gives if the ship that was hit charged ahead.  Having not read the article to get the context yet, I assume this is near the beginning of iron hulls and that the fire must have been directed towards the bow. Ryan Vesey 18:47, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Raking fire becomes less useful as a tactic
Talk:Anita Halpin

message: The claim that "Both of the Halpins are leading members of the "traditionalist" faction of the CPB[2] which advocates a continuation of the CPB's Popular Frontist politics and the idea of an alliance with the Labour Party bringing about socialism through Parliament, as enshrined in Britain's Road to Socialism." is very POV and lacks an unbiased source.
The CPB does not allow internal factions and the "traditionalist faction" does not exist outside the pages of the weekly worker, which is a biased source due to their long term opposition and hostility towards the CPB and Morning Star.
I suggest removing this passage.
Antispectre (talk) 16:47, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  traditionalist faction
Talk:Bill Wendell

message: I saw an interview with him on a San Francisco TV station, any corroboration appreciated
* 1996 March, Letterman fired his executive producer, Robert Morton - The New Yorker
Xb2u7Zjzc32 (talk) 14:57, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Bill Wendell claimed he was fired because he asked for more money, possibly from Robert Morton

message: ====this quote - He was a regular on the 1955-1956 version of The Ernie Kovacs Show, serving as the show's announcer, as well as a participant in sketches such as "Mr. Question Man" (a parody of The Answer Man). He also worked with Jack Benny, Bob Hope and other NBC personalities. - Huge bone of contention from the Kovacs camp.  "Mr. Question Man" appeared well before Steve Allen's "Mr. Answer Man", so much so that Kovacs himself took out a full page ad in Variety telling Allen to "get his own material". (Diane Rico biography "Kovacsland" 2002). Zabadu (talk) 22:02, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biography
Talk:Ems powerline crossing

message: This could be related to Wikinews item "Europe suffers widespread power cuts" but I don't yet know how to form the link.
The Categories in Wikinews are: November 5, 2006 | Published | Europe | Energy | Disasters and accidents | Science and technology
Fenton Robb 21:28, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Las (Greece)

message: Hi, for anyone interested (not that it matters a lot, to be truthful...., only just when looking for bibliography, particularly in other languages apart from English...), the Villehardouin surname presents several forms (as with many other names, although the one appearing int the Chronicle of Morea could be the "correct" one according to the name of the French commune), including: Villehardonin, De Villehardouin, de Hardouin, de Ville-Hardouin, von Villardouin...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.40.246.129 (talk) 09:13, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: No. Villehardonin is nothing but a OCR failure. The OCR program incorrectly reads Villehardonin where it is in fact written Villehardouin, that's all.--Phso2 (talk) 11:07, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Here you are, no OCR but exact reproduction, as you can find in other places (I have several books myself that are not OCR but exact copies, from academic sources), but again I agree it is Villehardouin, let's not continue this useless discussion, seriously we have better things to do..... I will leave it here.... http://books.google.co.uk/books/about/Gottfried_Von_Villehardonin.html?id=hlcoSgAACAAJ&redir_esc=y  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.40.246.129 (talk) 17:52, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: What you are talking about is supposed to be an exact reproduction of this book from 1860, by some Dr Lucas or Lukas (both variants are to be found in the original book). The so-called editor plainly printed the digitalized version, and entitled it "G von Villehardonin" because it is the (wrong) title that is to be found on GoogleBooks, but the title is "Gottfried von Villehardouin indeed, as you can read on the first page.--Phso2 (talk) 10:12, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Surname variations
Talk:Birdie Tebbetts

message: If you don't GA nom this article in the next week or so, I will. I won't claim it for the WikiCup though, since it wasn't my work that got this article into the GA neighborhood. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:23, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orsoni 
Talk:List of federally funded research and development centers

message: This should start with a neutral description, not criticism. Also, there should not be so many sentences starting with "critics say". These statements should either be sourced or deleted. 24.205.85.14 19:18, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Update: the entire introduction is actually a copy-paste from the CRS report listed in the 'external links' section. 24.205.85.14 20:10, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Dispersal (military)

message: This is regarding JHFTC's edit , which said "No way was that a precise figure", commenting about the statistic that a dispersed force could double the number of artillery rounds needed to destroy it. You can find my reference for that on the table at the bottom of page 120 of the fourth edition of How To Make War. As I know it's very annoying to have to go and buy/borrow a book, I'll provide the relevant info in a snippet here. 
Regarding what a dispersed defense is, he says "Dispersed defense is similar to prepared defense, except that the troops are spread over a wider area" and, he says "Prepared defense is when troops have time to dig in and prepare to defend." Looking at the table, a dispersed defense requires at least twice as many tons of ammunition as all the other defenses provided (those are: hasty defense, prepared defense, and dispersed defense). This is likely due to the fact that the dispersed defense he refers to uses twice as much land area as the other two (he provides 7 sq km for a dispersed defense, 3.6 for the other two). He appears to use the words "division" and "unit" in the surrounding text interchangeably, but I believe he is referring to divisions on the table, or "units" of equivalent size in non-US militaries. Either way, it does make sense. If you double the area your forces are taking up, all things being equal, it will take twice as many artillery rounds to inflict the same damage to all of them, unless you were initially causing overkill (which means using too many artillery rounds). -NorsemanII 06:04, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Since the power of an explosion varies with the square of the distance, I'm not sure Mr. Dunnigan's assumption that the calculation is linear is accurate...-Toptomcat 15:29, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

text: Okay, but even accounting for that, the phrase "as much as double" is misleading. By this rule, spreading them out over three times as much space would require three times as many artillery rounds, violating the maximum that phrase implies. -Toptomcat 22:43, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Accuracy of information
Talk:Highland charge

message: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I think it should be remembered that the highland charge broke the first line of infantry at the battle of culloden.
The link under the battle of Culloden painting is to the wrong David Morier - but I'm a newbie and I don't know how to correct it!  Hopefully someone will come along who can... Stephstar 03:48, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

message: Something could be added to the article how the highland charge influenced British infantry tactics. The British army specifically developed a tactic for use in North American campaigns called “loose files and American scramble”, this is thought to have its roots in the highland charge. The Highland regiments were also known to perform the highland charge whilst in british service, most famously at the Plains of AbrahamBen200 (talk) 09:01, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Use by the British army

message: What is the difference between the Highland Charge and the Swedish Salvee? Noting that at least some of the Irish Brigade were veterans of the Thirty Year War. 
BCW Project describes the Swedish Salvee thus: "The front rank would kneel, the second rank would crouch and the third rank would stand. When commanded, all three ranks would fire simultaneously to deliver a devastating salvo, the "Swedish salvee". If the enemy stood firm, the musketeers would reload behind the shelter of the pikes to fire another salvo. As soon as the enemy faltered, the Swedish infantry charged forward to break them in hand-to-hand combat."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.1.235.124 (talk) 15:56, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Swedish Salvee
Talk:Richard Hudnut

message: There was a person named Richard Hudnut, cosmetics millionaire. He's mentioned on Natacha Rambova. --Alvestrand 21:44, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: no he wasnt  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arisedrew (talk • contribs) 20:53, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

text: And Natacha Rambova, Hudnut's stepdaughter is mentioned in this article too. Duh! Mike Hayes (talk) 18:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  He's a person too.
Talk:Sippar

message: I think this article should highlight one of the most famous cuneiform tablets discovered there, namely the "Sippar tablet" from the Epic of Gilgamesh.  This tablet contains information missing from the later Akkadian version and represents a critical element of the older (Old Babylonian) version of the Epic.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wiki-proofer-and-tagger (talk • contribs) 22:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Highlighting the Epic of Gilgamesh Sippar tablet? 

message: FYI, there is some talk at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Si.427 of moving information about that tablet into the archeology section here. Danstronger (talk) 16:49, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Si.427
Talk:Brion James

message: While I don't have the time right now, I plan on helping to make this page more organized in the near future.  Any help would be much appreciated.  MezzoMezzo 21:35, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: This page needs sections

message: I changed this as the wording made his death sound like a career set back.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gomez2002 (talk • contribs) 13:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Normally, it is, unless you're Buddy Holly or James Dean. --Rodhullandemu 00:41, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Career Cut Short

message: How does one pronounce "Brion"?173.61.94.184 (talk) 22:28, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Brion

message: Series: Delvecchio (1977), episode 14 "One Little Indian", role "Ralph" (seen in end credits; YouTube has episode, to verify credit)
T-BlackWolf
T-BlackWolf (talk) 01:49, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing TV Role
Talk:Bruce Fairbairn

message: minor edit.
citations needed re:
"brass... (a Fairbairn trademark) "
&
"Nine Voices at his memorial service."
from
http://yes.wikia.com/wiki/The_Ladder
re "INXS's" - is there any  citation from band management  or a
general tradition for plural usage of the band name "INXS"?
the "INXS's" which I found here seems problematical to my anal sensibility.
it's not traditional usage; yet it's not obvious, or forced enough
to be an intentional stylized usage.
For now I'm  following standard English usage &
strongly suggesting <INXS'> is the correct apostrophe form
- if the band management has any literate ambitions.
FURTHER WORK:
DATE:  Little Mountain Sound Studios. ?
the article will benefit from continued work.
Google searches for <Bruce Fairbairn> and <Bruce Earl Fairbairn> provide a wealth of useful additonal data to consider. Hilarleo 08:39, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  minor editing 200704.02 

message: what was the cause of bruce fairbairn's death? anyone know? --Doctoracdc72 (talk) 04:05, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  cause of death 
Talk:Tangermünde

message: I'm surprised there's no mention of the German surrender that took place here in 1945. The crossing of the broken Tangermunde bridge and the German armys position between the allies, made it quite a notable location at the time and well reported overseas. Stephenjh (talk) 10:18, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it is true that the 12th Army "Wenck" together with the remnants of the 9th Army on their retreat from Berlin across the Elbe bridge (previously blown up by the Wehrmacht - on the same day that the Allies entered Stendal and Tangermünde) surrendered to the Allies at Tangermünde. The official signing of the surrender, however, took place in Stendal. 2A02:8108:87C0:3248:3948:3CEC:FFE:C0F3 (talk) 01:12, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: German surrender
Talk:Tecklenburg

message: I propose that Burg Tecklenburg be merged into Tecklenburg. This former I don't think can stand on its own as its own article, and its content would fit perfectly into the latter. Please discuss below. MuZemike (talk) 22:14, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems ok to me to merge. Both articles are small, especially the Burg one. yasirniazkhan (talk) 22:44, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Tettnang

message: I don't know how to do it myself but there should be a caption below the map that says "Location of Tettnang within Germany". As it currently stands there is a box below it which hides another map called "Location of Tettnang within Bodenseekreis district" but at first glance the link looks like a caption for the Germany map. Sqgl (talk) 11:11, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  MAP CAPTION 
Talk:Mohamad Jawad Chirri

message: __TOC__
Is this sentence ok to have in a wikipedia article: "It was a great dream that had come true!"? Possibly biased?  
A. Scholar (Nabu) (talk) 02:15, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

message: This sounds translated or is written by a non-native speaker. In addition, it's not neutral, and is written from a point of view of praise rather than objective observation. Mohamad Jawad Chirri may very well be a great man, but it is not the job of an encyclopedia to try to convince people, rather, to give facts and have the readers interpret them. Even the way it starts is suspiciously propagandic... "Like many pioneers through known time..."
It sounds less like an attempt at objectivity and more of a desire to spin or create a narrative. Plus you need to cite some sources. I'm going to try and make this better  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rubecuber (talk • contribs) 23:16, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  strange phrasing and palpable bias
Talk:Torgau

message: Torgau was the site of a famous photo of American and Soviet soldiers reaching across to shake hands, and that was an early meeting.  It was not the first such meeting, as is commonly believed.  There was such a meeting a few days earlier at Strehla, a few kilometers to the south, also on the west bank of the Elbe.  There's a memorial to that event at Strehla.  140.147.160.78 20:58, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It wasn't a few days earlier, it was on the same day. And Torgau is the place that the meeting was made official. I've re-written the introduction, as "falsely most well known" is a bit too pointed for an introduction. The information is in the WWII section now. Xyl 54 (talk) 22:02, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  WWII meeting of Americans and Soviets 
Talk:Traben-Trarbach

message: Spiegel reports today that a former military bunker has been used as a very significant hub for the dark net, organised crime, cyber criminality etc. 650 (sic) police plus the special unit GSG9 were used. This is so significant that it needs to be included. 2001:8003:A02F:F400:F137:C48D:74DD:7B37 (talk) 00:27, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cyber criminality
Talk:Josef Strzygowski

message: I wonder what they mean by "German".  He was Silesian, was Polish, was Austrian; his language was German:  was it this??Georg Salta (talk) 20:10, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "...was a German art historian..." 
Talk:Tübingen

message: What the fuck?
Not a single fucking entry in the Tuebingen Talk Page?
You gotta be fucking kidding me.
This is pathetic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.187.111.111 (talk) 18:45, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: What's the first rule of Tübingen club? GyroMagician (talk) 19:10, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a single entry? 

message: The geography section contains this extraordinary bit in brackets: "(air line Tübingen City to Roßberg (869m)). This suggests that there is an airline with flights from Tübingen to Roßberg, which is complete nonsense. Norvo (talk) 22:27, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Air Line City Tübingen?!?! 

message: Some old page history that used to be at the title "Tübingen" is now at Talk:Tübingen/Old history. Graham87 11:33, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Page history
Talk:Trossingen

message: There is missing information about the holocaust and the fate of the Jews of this city. At least one Jew from this town is listed at Yad Vashem as murdered in the Nazi T4 "euthenasia project". See here in the German Wikipedia about art commemorating people from the town murdered by the Nazis. According to that article no Jews lived in the town prior to 1945.  Jews in the vicinity stayed after working in forced labor camps and factories during the war. See document here. A prominent Nazi financial leader was re-established as an honorary member of the city, ignoring his pro-Nazi conduct during AND AFTER the war. See here: The Respectable Career of Fritz Kiehn (on the publisher's website), and here: Hitler's Home Front - Wurtemberg under Hitler (on Google Books). פשוט pashute ♫ (talk) 22:53, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing info
Talk:Indiana's 8th congressional district

message: Should definitely be expanded... AnonMoos 22:07, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's now been expanded, but needs results of 2008 election. AnonMoos (talk) 18:57, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Burton Dreben

message: This article seems neutral?  What about it is not neutral?
:Greater detail is needed from the above editor.
::I mean 63.146.49.40 .  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.157.119.171 (talk) 14:18, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality? 

message: I recall reading somewhere (not sure exactly, I know that is not helpful) that the subject had to retire after some allegations of misconduct.   I do not mean to promote rumors, and if they are rumors, someone should delete this consistent with BLP.  I will look into this, but perhaps someone else knows more details.  Will try to follow up in the next couple of days.  Thank you.Philosophy Junkie (talk) 22:52, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: My bad, no BLP issues here since the subject is not L.  I cannot find a source online so I may have just made a mistake here.Philosophy Junkie (talk) 13:59, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Retirement and allegations of misconduct
Talk:Can Yücel

message: There is an RfC on the question of using "Religion: None" vs. "Religion: None (atheist)" in the infobox on this and other similar pages. 
The RfC is at Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion. 
Please help us determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 15:17, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion|Request for Comments]] 
Talk:Consolidated B-32 Dominator

message: This article has no references whatsoever; please get someone onto this.
I have no idea where the original information came from, but I did extensive cl;eanup of the wording and verified what's left with the source produced.--Buckboard 12:18, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: REFERENCES!!!

message: I deleted the last sentence in the lead because the statement did not seem compatible with the indicated range of the aircraft: 3,800 mi .--Jim in Georgia Contribs Talk  14:32, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Range 

message: The text states that due to problems with the turrets, they were left off the first example. But then a few lines later it says the first one had all of these turrets. Which is correct? Maury Markowitz (talk) 18:34, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  So did the first one have turrets or not?
Category talk:Maneuver tactics

message: I don't understand the function of this sub-category.  If it is intended to cover the tactics associated with manoeuvre warfare, then I would caution that it is stealing a lot of articles which are applicable to much more than just manoeuvre warfare.  In fact, just about everything in this category is far more general (at best somethings could be moved into a :Category:Land tactics but others even apply to air & sea warfare).  Consider: Withdrawal (military), Reconnaissance, Extraction (military), Take point, etc 
MCG 22:12, 11 November 2006 (UTC)