lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:HSwMS Sverige

message: Why in the world are the Swedish ships on wikipedia prefixed with HMS? As far as I know that prefix is reserved for Royal Navy vessels. Shouldn't the correct term be HSMS?
Manxruler 17:12, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Who would have the authority to reserve that prefix? No, ships of the Royal Swedish Navy is just as royal as their British counterparts, hence the designation HMS (Hans/Hennes Majestäts Skepp) 130.237.216.122 (talk) 09:33, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

text: It should be HMS. If not HMS and instead HSwMS than we should use the same prefix for british ships as in HBMS no? Or does the british navy somehow take president?  Superpig05 (talk) 10:59, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  Debated many times before We use HSwMS for Swedish warships  Lyndaship (talk) 12:13, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: HMS?

message: These vessels (trying to avoid showing my own preferences here) are a type that is not satisfactorily described by the terminology of either their own times or anything that has evolved since from historians. While the article does say their official type-name was panserskep, literally armored ship and coincidentally the same name used later by the Germans for their "Pocket battleships" (the latter a British term), that does not describe their function in doctrine. The article on "Sverige-class coastal defence Ships" has a very helpful section on doctrine which implies they were intended as capital ships in miniature, operating in line of battle in confined waters (doubtless counting on cooperation from shore batteries and torpedo boats) against an attacking amphibious group or blockading fleet. According to this doctrine, "Coast defence battleship" would be descriptive and correct. In English-language naval literature the categories of monitors, coast defense ships in general, and shore bombardment vessels are confusing and not always descriptive. The phrase "Small Capital Ships" was suggested to me in conversation and may be useful in this context.
In the evolution of capital ships, USS Monitor may be viewed as a step towards the eventual apotheosis of the Dreadnought, or as a competing, lesser vessel to force a capital ship of the time to keep to blue water rather than mix it up with such craft. The French, who in the 19th century had a vested interest in limiting the power of British capital ships with their overwhelming firepower, should probably have shown more interest in the monitor type than they actually did; they were influenced more by the "Jeune Ecole" and its notions of sea denial for commercial ships being a better way to oppose a superior fleet.
These Swedish vessels are an example of a smaller maritime nation that could not compete with the great powers going its own way to protect itself. They show a high degree of ingenuity and creativity.
(This is a "think" piece rather than objective analysis so I don't think it requires references).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Capn JackA (talk • contribs) 15:49, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terminology
Talk:Pansarskepp

message: Should not this article be merged with the one on Coastal defence ships? (the English term is certainly awkward, and while pansarskepp/panzerschiff/pantserschip/panssarilaiva and whatnot do make alot more sense in their respective language, it's the best we've got so far. Atleast until someone coin a better term). While the article on coastal defence ships should be somewhat brief, there should be room for country-specific details.  Scoo 08:11, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger with [[Coastal defence ship]]
Talk:Louis Segond

message: I'm curious to know how this French translation compares to English translations. Does anyone know? Is it more like King James / New International Version / New American Version / ?--12.217.102.127 21:56, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Segond also translated the Biblical apocrypha too, didn't he? Anyone have any links to these books? Rwflammang (talk) 17:04, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Apocrypha
Talk:HSwMS Carlskrona (P04)

message: Acouring to the article both the 57 mm canons had been taken of the ship by 2007, but in pictures from 2010 the front 57 mm seems to be there. Sources?
Walle83 (talk) 10:42, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Originally, the ship had 2x57mm and 2x40mm canons. The 57s have been removed. She still has 2x40mm canons and I'm guessing that might be what you see in those pictures. 193.181.64.129 (talk) 09:33, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: P.S: I will alter the armament section to mention the 2 40mm canons. They are clearly visible in the official photos on the website for the swedish defensive forces. 193.181.64.129 (talk) 09:36, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  57 mm canons? 
Talk:Thomas Circle

message: I think that the image caption for the map is erroneous.  Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't believe telephones had been invented in 1808.  Was this supposed to be 1908?  SchuminWeb (Talk) 22:10, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 1808 DC telephone directory

message: I'd like to see documentation on some of these facts.  The through lanes on 14th street were put in place long before the 1980s.  I have a photo from 1943 with those lanes in place.  The underpass was built in the 1950s.  There were never streetcars on that part of Massachusetts Avenue.  The only streetcar underpass ever built was the Dupont Circle stop.  And SchuminWeb, you're right about telephones.  I think we can do better for a picture anyway.  I'm going to go ahead and make some corrections.  SDC 06:47, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Several errors in article
Talk:Margo Harshman

message: I can't find a photo to use that would be allowed. I know it needs a photo. I want Margo to have a great page.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Toolman111 (talk • contribs) 02:33, June 18, 2008
:Most images found on the web are copyrighted. The image needs to be from a source that has released the image with no restrictions. All publicity photos are copyrighted and restricted as are wire service images. Please respect the copyright of the photographers who took those photos as well as the rights of the companies that employ them. There are free sources of images as outlined at Commons:Free media resources/Photography, but you have to know what to look for. That page lists Flickr, but not all photographers on Flickr use free licenses. Basically, if you didn't take the picture, don't bother uploading it. --Dual Freq (talk) 02:40, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Photos

message: It is a direct copy and paste from imdb. Please read Wikipedia:Copyright violations. Please don't directly copy and paste information from copyrighted pages. --Dual Freq 22:10, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Biography section

message: I have reverted an edit that (with no citation) changed wording about her siblings to "She has an older sister, an older brother and a younger brother." The cited source in the article contains a direct quotation from Harshman saying, "I have two older sisters and an older brother." I think we would need some well-sourced material to contradict that information. Eddie Blick (talk) 20:52, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Siblings
Talk:Meo (ethnic group)

message: Sections of this article seem to be straight copy paste from another website. SahirShah 17:51, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright violation

message: Why is this article placed under Indian categories, Sardar Tufail is a Pakistani politician (Bilalchd 02:17, 13 November 2007
* https://archive.org/details/20200823_20200823_1256
* https://archive.org/details/20200823_20200823_1256 Ahsan Ali Rajput (talk) 18:21, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Categories

message: Why when searching for "meo" Wikipedia does not return the possibility of disambiguation of "meo" (which would include de article "Meo (Portugal)") but returns disambiguation of "mayo" instead!?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 512upload (talk • contribs) 21:58, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meo (Portugal) 

message: According to book "The Partition of India and Mountbatten" Ahirs started attacking Muslims of Gurgaon and Alwar. Jekins wrote that on 30 April 1947 Hindu Jats and Gujjars had joined Ahirs against Meos, in one village alone Ahirs had killed 28 meos.36 bodies of Meos were found in a nullah near one of the Gurgaon villages and that these bodies had been brought from Alwar where the state forces had fired on a crowd from an Army vehicle.
* The Partition of India and Mountbatten http://books.google.co.in/books?id=Ac4oqDNFzVcC&pg=PA181&dq=ahirs+of++alwar&hl=en&ei=g9uaTa23GsbNrQeG_fSHBw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=6&ved=0CEsQ6AEwBQ#
* The Sikhs in action http://books.google.co.in/books?id=YtgxAAAAIAAJ&q=meos+and+ahirs&dq=meos+and+ahirs&hl=en&ei=GuiaTaWhDtGrrAeM_rnpBg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=10&ved=0CE0Q6AEwCTgo
* Kunwar Mohammad Ashraf, an Indian scholar and revolutionary, 1903-1962 http://books.google.co.in/books?id=Dcs5AQAAIAAJ&q=meos+and+ahirs&dq=meos+and+ahirs&hl=en&ei=ruiaTY_7Fc-GrAeenZWEBw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=9&ved=0CE8Q6AEwCDg8
* My political memoirs; or, Autobiography http://books.google.co.in/books?ei=DeqaTcjHEc3irAfkvPzkBg&ct=result&id=LUbRAAAAMAAJ&dq=meos+and+ahirs&q=jats
* Jinnah papers http://books.google.co.in/books?ei=Z-uaTcvvEYvxrQea9YD4Bg&ct=result&id=vgFuAAAAMAAJ&dq=meos+and+ahirs&q=ahirs
* Punjab gazetteers, 1883, bound in 10 vols., without title-leaves-page-32 http://books.google.co.in/books?id=YacIAAAAQAAJ&q=ahirs+palwal&dq=ahirs+palwal&hl=en&ei=4fW3Tf7SFIzNrQfkxKDRDQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CDwQ6AEwAQ
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sumitkachroo (talk • contribs) 20:23, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meo killings during partition 

message: Apparently there is confusion in terms of linking the Meos as a caste, when they can be any community from the Mewat region who are classified as Mewati. The related groups show categories they are classified from. GujaratiHistoryinDNA (talk) 23:27, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can someone stop editors who link Meos as a caste when they are an ethnic group of people who are from Mewat?
Talk:DK Rap

message: The person making this page killed the lyrics so yeah.
==Sources==
Dropping these here. Might be one or two redundancies. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 22:16, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: lyrics

message: Dropping these here. Might be one or two redundancies. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 22:16, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources
Talk:It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia

message: Template:Reynolds family tree has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. InfiniteNexus (talk) 04:07, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomination for deletion of [[Template:Reynolds family tree]] 

message: Aside from the tagline, the show self-references Seinfeld not infrequently. Drsruli (talk) 21:47, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seinfeld
Talk:C. Douglas Dillon

message: family still owns runs chateau haut brion which should be included in this article
/s/ izapa bolon jr 69.121.221.97 (talk) 04:46, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: chateau

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :C. Douglas Dillon (Template) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at  until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  1234qwer1234qwer4 14:18, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "C. Douglas Dillon (Template)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:List of schools in Nova Scotia

message: For Kings Edgehill School, listed on the bottom under Private Schools, It says that it only serves Grades 7-12. However, It currently has grade 6 academic. Is this relevant (as relevant as this page is in the long run!)? 142.68.183.151 02:46, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Kings Edgehill
Talk:ORP Orzeł (1938)

message: Orzelgate? It's not an American political scandal. Put a citation for this name or I call bullshit. And the Royal Polish Navy did not have any submarines; there wasn't a Royal Polish Anything after 1795. Who added this nonsense? And why did nobody catch it? <eleland/talkedits> 23:50, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've taken care of it as best I could. An IP editor did a ton of only slightly camouflaged vandalism a good while ago, and you're right, it's shocking it wasn't caught soon enough for it to simply be undone. Manxruler (talk) 20:17, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  wth? 

message: This article is currently at start/C class, but could be improved to B-class if it had more (inline) citations. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 20:37, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: B-class review

message: It was lost at sea, cause and location unknown. Why does the article give location [54.983333, 1]?  That should be removed. 88.19.61.115 (talk) 19:49, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location?
Talk:Nottingham Cooperative

message: Could we get citations in the history section?  I know we have sources lying around.  We should do this before they get lost in time.  
Acornwithwings 21:32, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: History section

message: AFAIK we don't follow rochdale principles and certainly aren't owenite or whatever.  I'd like to remove the sidebar. (Jim) 66.222.62.214 07:06, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sidebar

message: Nottingham seems to have been put under the Student Housing Co-ops category.  Student cooperatives are a particular category of co-ops that are open exclusively to students.  Students nearly always form a fair portion of the membership, but there is no emphasis on being specifically student housing, and in fact Nottingham is more notable for having a diverse population of ages and occupations than for simply having students live there.  I will remove this category.  Acornwithwings 16:32, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Student Housing Category

message: Why were they removed from the list of performers? Acornwithwings (talk) 21:10, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sun City Girls

message: Why is this article proprosed for deletion? I cannt find any specific needs that are not met or that are being requested? Will whoever earmarked this site for deletion please let us know what is needed?--Benjamin Pierce, or clown in black and yellow  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.104.60.104 (talk) 20:32, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: proposal for deletion

message: I boldly removed some sections for lacking verifiability and reliable sources. Feel free to add back whatever facts can be cited. The "list of events" section can probably be paired down a bit too, by removing the bands without articles and without citations. LOLthulu05:38, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've gotten started with removing bands from the list by removing the ones with no citations and no wiki articles. I'll pull out the rest of the uncited bands in a day or two. Can any of the pre-Nottingham shows be referenced? They'd be nice to keep. LOLthulu 06:08, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

text: I'm also going to clean out the "events" section, but I'm not quite sure what's referenced to the Isthmus article. If someone could add inline citations, that'd be great, as the article isn't on teh interwebz... otherwise I'll probably remove the lead paragraph entirely. LOLthulu 14:41, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Did that. Would like to see citeable assertions cited and returned to article, but I don't have access to such sources. LOLthulu 23:35, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

text: I reverted this change. Your beliefs notwithstanding, the burden of proof is on the editor who adds or restores text. Please cite factual assertions added to this article. Thnx! LOLthulu 03:17, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleaning Up Unsourced Statements
Talk:List of German language philosophers

message: I'm generally an inclusionist, but the recent inclusion of Schiller and Goethe leads me to ask: why Goethe? (Schiller as philosopher: fine with me.) But on the basis of what texts by Goethe would he be included in this list? I won't remove him, but wanted to ask. Universitytruth 22:48, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The introduction to Goethe's Theory of Colours is a contribution to the philosophy of science. This is documented in the late Princeton philosopher Walter Kaufmann's book Goethe, Kant and Hegel. — goethean ॐ 15:41, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

text: What's the difference between a philosopher and someone who writes philosophy? — goethean ॐ 16:58, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

text: That seems a bit hasty. You could have just put a little note by Goethe indicating that he is primarily known as a literary figure. I would have let User:igni speak before taking drastic measures. I personally find that Anglo-American academics are accustomed to thinking of academic disciplines as eternally static categories. Was there such solid distinctions in the year 1800 in Germany? — goethean ॐ 17:20, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

text: (replied on usertalk) — goethean ॐ 18:15, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Goethe
Template talk:User Saints WikiProject

message: I would like to leave the invitations to join the wikiproject,  leaving the box that was placed there.
Can we revert thnis to the previous edition, have a bot convert the template, and then go back change the template to its original format. --evrik 22:49, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What are you requesting? A permission to wikispam user talk pages? That is a no-no, see wikipedia:spam#Internal spamming: categorising user (talk) pages is definitely not one of the allowed uses of wikispam. --Francis Schonken 06:35, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Categorizing
Talk:Flaming Lotus Girls

message: I think Flaming Lotus Girls should have all been capitalized, but i can't move it myself yet.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Avidd (talk • contribs) 00:01, 30 June 2006.
:Done. --Zoz (t) 12:51, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:The Liquidator (instrumental)

message: This is very biased towards Wolverhampton Wanderers FC. --81.174.250.220 23:02, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The first side to use this song is unsourced. Only some notes from a record support Chelsea. I have removed other claims until some reliable references can be found.--Egghead06 (talk) 18:50, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: A google search for who was first to play the song at a football match will show a range of clubs with Chelsea, West Brom and Wolves the main three which will appear. The problem is, the sources aren't deemed to be reliable enough to quote on wikipedia, but it seems clear that there are definite claims from all three clubs. I therefore think that West Brom and Wolves should be reinstated as claimants in the main article. 97rob (talk) 16:15, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

text:  Also, there doesn't appear to be any proper reference for Chelsea's claim to being first. 97rob (talk) 16:18, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Can't see a reliable source for anyone being the first, if indeed anyone even knows who was the first. We are talking 1969 after all! As we are dealing with football teams, nearly all references are from blogs or club chat pages - useless.  Would suggest we reference the teams that use it (Wolves, WBA, Chelsea etc.) until a reliable source verifies the first user at football matches?--Egghead06 (talk) 19:39, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, seems the best thing to do. Chelsea currently use it every home match, West Brom have started using it again in the last few matches, and Wolves don't currently use it (West Brom and Wolves were banned by West Midlands Police as it got fans to swear). Not sure about how much its used for other clubs, though. 97rob (talk) 22:03, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Football use

message: I have a copy of this 45 record and can provide a jpg photo image of the record in its paper sleeve for inclusion on the page, provided that doing so doesn't infringe copyright in any way/form.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by RogerHall123 (talk • contribs) 15:37, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image of a single disc in its paper sleeve
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anatomy/Articles

message: I will be typing out some of the more important structures in the TA, in the order specified by the stardard.  Anyone can add anything, but I ask that you consult the TA (available at Amazon, perhaps online somewhere, but I haven't found it there yet.)
--Mauvila 23:03, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terminologia Anatomica 

message: Comments on status of articles can be placed in brackets after the structure. e.g. 'Petrotympanic fissure [NEEDS MAJOR WORK]' --Mauvila 09:11, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Status of articles in TA list 

message: This structured list of anatomical structures is far too valuable to be gathering dust in the closet.
Therefore, I've merged it into the Outline of human anatomy.  The Transhumanist 09:31, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved/merged Terminologia Anatomica section into encyclopedia
Talk:Álvaro Cunhal

message: Álvaro Cunhal really suported almost all USSR foreign policys and their interventions in other countries like Hungary and Czechoslovakia, unlike other communist leaders, like Santiago Carrillo and Enrico Berlinguer. He also suported inicially the August 1991 coup that would finnish with USSR. The kind of communism that he always suported was totalitarian communist, that he believed to be the only true democracy. I say that in the most absolute Neutral Point of View. Like it or not, Álvaro Cunhal was the most orthodox from all the western Europe secretary-general. Not to mencione some of these points creates a rather non neutral or like too pro-Cunhal biography, like it´s shown here. This entry is not for or against Cunhal, but it must allow to all the readers to know him and his politics better.    
User:Mistico
Let me give you a different perspective. I feel that it is an insult to Cunhal to say he was a "totalitarian", as it is solely based on appreciations from his enemies. I feel it would be simple to contradict that assertion by reading the 1962 PCP Program, in which a plural democracy for Portugal is clearly the objective. Or his speech after he returned from exile, in April, 29, 1974. Therefore I´m forced to say that I don't think that Mistico's view of Cunhal is not "neutral". It IS hard to be neutral about Cunhal, I accept that. But when someone had the chance - and I did - to talk privately with him, or laugh with him (his sarcastic sense of humour is something I'd like to be more exposed: just imagine him saying that sometimes he felt the need to use his keychain as a fake mobile phone, in order to be like everyone else in the street...). In the end, History will be more just about him. But le me remind you that, in spite of being in prison for 15 years, 8 of which in total isolation (plus 15 months incomunicado), beaten and tortured, no one as ever heard a word from him seeking revenge from that. So, I just ask you all to be more open-minded when discussing Cunhal. Vvvieira
There is an RfC on the question of using "Religion: None" vs. "Religion: None (atheist)" in the infobox on this and other similar pages. 
The RfC is at Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion. 
Please help us determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 04:12, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is an RfC on the question of using "Religion: None" vs. "Religion: None (atheist)" in the infobox on this and other similar pages. 
The RfC is at Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion. 
Please help us determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 04:12, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion|Request for Comments]]