lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of Mobile Suit Gundam SEED locations

message: Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Junius_Seven"
Is the name Roosevelt meant to refer to one of the U.S. Presidents, or is this just a coincidence? TomStar81
It most likely does refer to either Franklin or Theodore Roosevelt. The Atlantic Federation, which is the most powerful part of the Earth Alliance and provides the largest portion of its fleet, is a direct descendant of the United States (it also includes the rest of North America, Greenland, Iceland, and the British Isles).68.47.175.214 06:54, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: From the Junis Seven talk page

message: I've heard mention of a supposedly neutral colony called "Litieria" (possibly different spelling) being mentioned in the Astray comics. Does anyone have any additional information on this? -- -- ??? 26 August 2005
:My forté is Universal Century, so I haven't heard anything about it; however, you might consider placing a mention of it on the Space Colony (Gundam) talk page and see if anything materialzes there. TomStar81 03:02, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Litieria?
Talk:Clock arithmetic

message: Reviving this page. Reasons:-
*having a more accessible treatment is a good thing;
*no musician would call this an 'unimportant' special case - it includes for example the cycle of fifths.
Charles Matthews 09:04, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. Oleg Alexandrov 15:02, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Nebuchadnezzar (disambiguation)

message: Someone has substituted Aram for Syria, owlishly thinking to be correct. But the link leads to a disambiguation. Can someone more knowledgable note which ancient kingdom in modern Syria Nebuchadnezzar actually claimed to have conquered and edit the "correction"? --Wetman 09:23, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Its not just an ancient kingdom its the one in the entry "Aram the ancient empire included Lebanon, Syria, parts of Israel, Jordan and Mesopotamia" but there is no article for it. (No it not "Aram Naharaim", that is just a part of the region called Aram.) Kuratowski's Ghost 09:32, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
Talk:International Pen Friends

message: Please note that it is a spam added by an Italian user, domain registrar of the website. On the site, you are asked to pay to Andrea d'Ambra, the name of the italian spammer that added this voice on all wikis. AdA, aka "Skugnizzo" is being voted for a ban for spam and vandalism.
:this remark concern the website www dot ipfeurope dot com. The real website is ipfpenfriends.com Polletfa 05:57, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  SPAM 

message: ipfeurope.* are blacklisted. See  for more information. Polletfa 06:44, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blacklist 

message: "International Penfriends" is a trademark owned by International Penfriends company in USA (internationalpenfriends.com).
No other one has the right to call theirself with this name so you should stop links from others.
: We get such complaints about once a month from both organizations so named.  It is our decision to include both since there appear to be competing, valid trademark claims.  We encourage the two organizations involved to resolve the matter amongst themselves. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 18:23, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright Violation
Talk:American Century

message: We have an Indian Century article, and business magazines frequently mention a "Chinese Century", shouldn't such an article exist? 
* Chinese Century/Asian Century/Indian Century
:Maybe.  Write one! Greyfedora 00:09, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Chinese Century?

message: The page mentions an article blaming Trump for the end of the American Century, isn't such an article very biased to be placed on Wikipedia?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 177.98.163.135 (talk) 00:59, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Agreed 100%, don't take it seriously since it's common in Wokepedia. 177.38.210.52 (talk) 20:48, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trump and the American Century
Talk:Punjab and Haryana High Court

message: Hello,
I was just searching around this page and found some material being exactly same as this one. The material I found was on the official website of the Court on which this article is written. The information written there is lengthy and detailed. Half of that information has no connection with what the article is about. The information is directly copy-pasted without being taken care of the quality of the article. I have spent hours to improve the quality of the article. But, the extra matter must be deleted. 
I am not able to tell from where should I delete. So, if anyone is up for it, please take the duty to edit it and remove the unnecessary information. The information I am talking about is in the Evolution section.
Regards.
Kashisharora11 (talk) 16:48, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  The page seems to be copy pasted; irrelevant information.
Talk:John Fox Burgoyne

message: *Article: :de:John Fox Burgoyne  
*Corresponding English-language article: John Fox Burgoyne  
*Worth doing because: He's pretty important... and I'm doing this for fluidity with commons stuff.  
*Originally requested by: gren 08:39, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation details 
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Linguistics/Phonetics/Phonology template/Archive 1

message: Sheesh, the table template was mess. Ejectivs/implosivs and plzd/lbzd velars listed separately at the ends? I fixed that (so it's slightly closer to sonority hierarcy order now), but here's a few further thoughts on possible changes:
* How about uniting "stops" as a single row, with the different phonation types as subrows? (See eg. Abkhaz.) I understand that the "voiceless left, voiced right" distinction works if a language has no other phonation opposition, but if there's glottalized, aspirated etc. stops the system breiks down.
* And speaking of aspirates, there's no row for them @TM. Granted, they're transcribed by the means of a diacritic, but so are ejectivs.
* Also on the topic of diacritics, what does everyone think about the inclusion of the two secondary articulation columns? I suspect having a labialized uvular series is more common than palatalized velar; and if they're only there for example, wouldn't just one column suffice?
* Would it be sensible to erase the dnt/alv borders, when there's only a single commonly used symbol? Or would it be better to explicitely add /t̪/ etc?
* I furthermore consider putting the fricativ & approximant rows together in a similar fashion as the newest IPA. I'd have done it straight away, except I'm not sure how common it is to need something classified as ambiguous wrt. this distinction.
--Tropylium 22:41, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Table order
Talk:Antequera

message: *Article: :de:Antequera
*Corresponding English-language article: Antequera
*Worth doing because: Gap in EB2004 parity
*Status: Translated, but review requested by David Brooks 21:34, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Translation details

message: I added a link pointing to "A Spanish Surprise" This travel story covers a city walk with some emphasis on Efebo. Scribbleman 07:43, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please wait for a response on this talkpage when you announce your intentions to include these Terje Raa travel stories. Don’t include them yourself, as including these links are your only contributions here, you seem to have a conflict of interest. Please wait for community input, thanks. --Van helsing 12:37, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: After one month, still no feedback from the Antequera Editors................ so I took the liberty of inserting the link myself. I figure you would be interested in how a traveller presents Antequera - as a complement to your own more factual article. Keep the link if you like. There are no commercial interests behind my initiative. Scribbleman (talk) 17:22, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: External links policy on Advertising and conflicts of interest states You should avoid linking to a website that you own, maintain or represent, and in this case, you are Terje Raa  . Unfortunately your  conflict of interest editing involves contributing to Wikipedia in order to promote yourself and your articles. Such a conflict is strongly discouraged. Your contributions to wikipedia under Scribbleman  consist entirely of promoting Terje Raa / bootsnall.com / travellady.com and is considered  WP:Spam. Looking through your contributions as a whole, the all seem to be Terje Raa/bootsnall.com/travellady.com related only. Please do not continue adding links to your own websites to Wikipedia. It has become apparent that your account are only being used for spamming inappropriate external links and for self-promotion.  Wikipedia is NOT a "repository of links" or a "vehicle for advertising" and persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted. Any further spamming may result in your account and/or your IP address being blocked from editing Wikipedia. Avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines. You're here to improve Wikipedia -- not just to promote yourself, right?  --Hu12 13:28, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: External Link

message: Unless it was pasted here from somewhere else, this edit established the usage of the page as . Kindly maintain it pending a new consensus to the contrary. — LlywelynII 09:11, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:ERA]]

message: * . 
may be a useful text but it's currently unused by the article and is just a copy of the EB11's very outdated sourcing. Reïnclude it once it's being used to source various points. — LlywelynII 09:15, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources for article expansion
Talk:Apicius

message: Apicius does not mean beekeeper. At best the adjective means "liked by bees", whence "dainty"; in any case, as with modern names (e.g., Smith and Fisher), what Apicius "means" is irrelevant.
Though the name Apicius appears once in Tac. Ann. 4.1, it is with no connection to our cook; the story of Apicius sailing to Africa to look at crabs is not in Tacitus, but in Athenaeus. Bill 11:38, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Minor corrections

message: I'm inclined to sort out the people called Apicius (at least three, apparently) from the book called Apicius, which no ancient source connects with any of the people. The book would get an article of its own. Does anyone object or want to comment? Andrew Dalby 18:28, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No one objected, so I've gone ahead and done it. For links to all four articles see Apicius (disambiguation). Two biographical articles are new; Marcus Gavius Apicius is completely rewritten: the present article Apicius, on the cookbook, could do with some revision and expansion if anyone's interested. Andrew Dalby 13:11, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguating utterly?

message: Removed this:
it has recently been discoverd that pasta was used in ancient times there is evidence of a type lasagna product .
The sentence contradicts previous information in the article and has spelling errors.  Suspected vandalism.  If you disagree, please add, correcting spelling and hopefully giving a reference. OliAtlason (talk) 02:49, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I just got a file quarantined by my antivirus program visiting that link. I will remove the link. On another note, I really dislike the translation of "amulo" as "cornflour" in the sample recipe. The recipe is presented as a quotation, so I am hesitant to just change it to "flour", but cornflour is misleading to a US reader (where corn=maize, unavailable to the Romans), and uninformative to a UK reader (where corn=any of several different grains).Plantdrew (talk) 17:38, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  Pliny describes the manufacture of amylum in some detail, and it's wheat starch as reflected in the current version. Tarchon (talk) 19:40, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Lasagne vandalism

message: I made two changes:
* It's not "1st century AD" but "5th century AD". The article used to say "4th or 5th century", which was correct, but back in 2018 this was changed by 2a02:c7f:1203:e900:4402:f759:2636:147b to "1st century" without source or explanation. We can now correct this to "5th century" because the reliable Bruno Laurioux is already cited in the next paragraph for the "5th century" claim. So I attached the same footnote.
* Not cited by Pliny the Elder: this claim was added by 2a01:cb15:8068:9b00:6d95:6f4b:ce35:9156 in late 2021. The reference given was wrong, so I checked the index to Pliny. Yes, it's true that Pliny mentions the gastronome Marcus Gavius Apicius (see that article) but Pliny never cites the cookbook Apicius and never suggests that M. Gavius Apicius wrote a cookbook. Andrew Dalby 20:45, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  First paragraph
Talk:Geoff Crammond

message: The main article lists the xbox conversion of GP4 as being unreleased... - I'm pretty sure that this is wrong, but dont have the release year to be able to move it into the "released" list. Hopefully someone with a better memory than me can fix it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.80.32.11 (talk • contribs) 
:According to these sites   the xbox version was cancelled back in 2002 when Microprose UK was closed.  johnSLADE (talk) 10:41, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Xbox
Talk:The Sign and the Seal

message: This article is clearly just a dump of an opinion piece written by Gil Kezwer; it may even have been added by the author himself, and I can find no trace of it searching for terms on Google. It is unlikely that this piece carries no copyright, and as such, unless it was contributed by the author himself (a possibility so distinct that I have refrained from adding a copyright warning for now), it would constitute a violation of the copyright agreement.
Since it is an opinion piece, it also violates Neutral point of view. This article is, certainly, not fit as an encyclopaedia entry at any rate and much be rewritten.
--Sbp 12:16, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Deleted section on reception as it's entirely one sided, and just about the opposite of neutral, violating almost all relevant Wikipedia guidelines.  Deleting this section is not vandalism.  It is potentially libelous, and as other discussion indicates, needs to go.  Discussion here is unanimous.  If someone objects, they can attend to this issue with a NPOV rewrite.  The addition of such a section, written as it is, is in it's self vandalism.Didshe (talk) 08:53, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm afraid you're incorrect on a number of points. The section is well sourced. Reliable sources indicate that the book, despite selling well, was not generally favorably reviewed.  Therefor, it does reflect Wikipedia guidelines on neutrality. The discussion you refer to here is over five years old and refers to a entirely different version of the article.  In other words, there is no unanimity for your changes.  FInally, while I now understand that your edits weren't intended as simple vandalism, removing sourced sections without even an edit summary will usually be taken as vandalism on Wikipedia.  ClovisPt (talk) 14:45, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Deleted section
Talk:Pentane

message: Trying to think of something to say about this drab little molecule.
*from the comments above - pentane has only the faintest odor, possibly that is due to trace impurities?
*It probably undergoes dehydrocyclization in refineries.
*It would also be nice to know the C5 content in crude oils as well as typical petroleum fractions, e.g. gasolines.
*Pentanes are purification from NaK?
*isopentane makes a glass at low T, I have heard. 
*neopentane can be viewed as an expanded form of methane, whereby each of the four H's are replaced by Me.  I guess that next generation in such bare-bones dendrimers, i.e. C(CMe3)4 would be too crowded.
*regiochem of free radical chlorination would be worth while?
*butane is convertable via VOPO4/O2 into maleic anhydride, I think, but I dont know if pentane does that.
--Smokefoot 22:50, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: We could do with a hand from synthetic organic colleagues here: why would anyone choose to use pentane in the lab? Physchim62 (talk) 11:57, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have heard a really strange tale that hexane is converted to hexane dicarboxylic acid in the body and due to its length it is incorporated into the DNA and because of this better use pentane or cyclohexane in the lab. I do n ot belive it and I also found no proof of it in any article, but some people belive this. 
Lower boiling point maks it convenient if you extract something with a low boiling point. And it is better for deep temperature mixtures than hexane.--Stone 12:34, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Poor ole pentane

message: The words "unfunctionalized" and "functionality" are used in the section on Uses, and the latter is linked, but the link doesn't give you any information about the use of functionality in the context of hydrocarbons.  
wellsoberlin 20:01, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: disambiguated to functional group, and also added the link to the function page (might need a bit of a rewrite of the definition on the latter).  Hope this helps, and cheers for bringing this to our attention.  --Dirk Beetstra T C 20:08, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Functional

message: "Pentane is any or one of the organic compounds with the formula C5H12."
:Is it so? I think pentane usually refers to n-pentane.--Abhishek Jacob (talk) 11:36, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I suppose that is true in IUPAC-speaking labs, but is it true in the industry?  Before IUPAC all C5H12 alkanes were called "pentanes", isn't that so? am no chemist, but that is what I recall from my high school org chem classes... All the best, --Jorge Stolfi (talk) 16:05, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pentane is any isomer or just n-pentane? 

message: Source: none at the moment, there was an article on NASA's web site I have read recently. 212.188.108.213 (talk) 19:39, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pentane is used in heat pipes for thermal control of spacecraft
Talk:Yottagram

message: How many yottagrams does our galaxy weigh?
I can't think of a better science to culture crossover article.  This page has the potential to be great.  In terms of using the word yottagram in a movie, what kind of sf anime monster would one be talking about here?  What cartoon character could weigh a yottagram?  The dialogue in such a supposed anime could be something about 'putting a zettagram of sauce on a yottagram of food' or  'Our yard is 10 to the 28 square meters in area and when I mow it I put out a zettagram of clippings' or  'If there is more than one universe, how many yottagram would the engine weigh to drive it around to the other universes?'   
This is the sort of thing that kids live for when they are doing term papers, but it is certainly beyond me how this content could be woven into the actual interesting science that must be involved at this scale.
hanzomon5--64.12.117.7 12:19, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: The Yottagram In Science Fiction
Talk:Inverse

message: This disambiguation page is too long and tedious to use.  Any ideas or precedents for making it better? --Commander Keane 12:26, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I am afraid it has got even longer, I merged in invert, inversion, and inverted. At least we now have everything together, I found it confusing to have such closely related terms separately.--Patrick 22:31, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. The page has become too large and cumbersome. It could be split with cross referencing linksChevin (talk) 14:43, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Length and ease of use

message: There is nothing on inverse perspective at perspective (graphical).  Might it be removed? --Zemylat 02:28, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Inverse perspective?

message: Could you explain what still needs to be cleaned up on Talk:Inverse?  Just a short explanation would be good...  as far as I can tell, it's formatted properly according to WP:MOSDAB, so it's not clear what work still needs to be done.  --Interiot 21:34, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, I think it's just still too hard to find anything e.g. the 2 categories I added, science and mathematics, may be a little weak. I'm sure there's a better way to arrange it -- I just don't know what it is. Also some entries may not really need to be here e.g. antonym, anitmatter; they might be examples of a kind of inversion, but does anyone call them that? And who would be coming to this page looking for Terminology of homosexuality#Other late 19th and early 20th century sexological terms? Ewlyahoocom 22:44, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: MOSDAB/Inverse

message: There should be a definition about inversion/eversion. They refer to anatomical movements. Inversion is rotation of the feet so that the soles face each other. Eversion is rotation of the feet so the soles face away from each other.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.183.0.83 (talk) 13:01, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe you are correct about this. However, prior to adding this, mention of both terms should be added to the ankle article, specifically in the ankle#Movement section, which currently only listed plantar and dorsi flexion. We both know the joint is more complex than this, so first add the other methods of articulation concepts to that article, and once that is finalized and accepted, redirection references to them from this article can be placed. Tyciol (talk) 03:11, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Inversion / Eversion
Talk:As-Sirāt

message: I believe the Arabic is الصرات but I'm not sure on that. I think Poe might've mentioned it as well, I'm trying to remember the first time I saw it. In Islam it also means the "straight path" I believe. Khiradtalk 15:56, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I, though it may have been in bad WP form, wrote that Chinvat was similar because, though it is almost identical to the Islam concept, I have never come across anything documenting this (and would be very interested at any resources confirming what has been my own speculation for a long time). I'm happy to leave this as is, but it might come under fire from a Muslim and it was this I was anticipating. Also, should the title be changed to Al-Sirat? Just to follow naming conventions? I fully realize this is often used for al-Ṣirāṭ/aṣ-Ṣirāṭ, etc.; but the circumflex is a bit archaic for modern Arabic transliteration conventions. Khiradtalk 05:02, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

message: Is there a source for this, in the Qur'an, the Hadith, or anywhere else? Evercat (talk) 02:24, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Source?