Talk:James E. McDonald

message: I'm rather concerned that this entry is making a lot of unsourced statements concerning McDonal's intents opinions and relationships with others, as well as a lot of other unsourced references to his work.
It might all be 100% true (or not), but it should still be directly sourced through a citation from a third party such as a biographer or a press report.
perfectblue 09:53, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Verifiability

message: This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 09:55, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating

message: I read the article pretty closely and could find nothing that could be classed as "weasel words".
The tag: "This article contains weasel words: vague phrasing that often accompanies biased or unverifiable information." should probably be removed unless someone can point to something in the article that justifies its continued presence.Zedshort (talk) 20:52, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Do the comparison between now and 2009 when I tagged the article. It's actually much improved. I'll pull down the tag. Simonm223 (talk) 21:14, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  weasel words 

message: 29:08	
1:13:28
UFO Chronicles Aliens on Earth
(2017)1h 13mNR
Report a problem
According to this documentary it is obviously murder, however none of the pages indicate the fact set, why is that? wait, let me guess...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.242.195.134 (talk) 15:45, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  suicide? appears to be murder 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on James E. McDonald. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110716064152/http://dewoody.net/ufo/Science_in_Default.html to http://dewoody.net/ufo/Science_in_Default.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:44, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on James E. McDonald. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060624204634/http://www.ufoevidence.org/Newsite/Files/MacDonaldSubmissionUFOSymposium.pdf to http://www.ufoevidence.org/Newsite/Files/MacDonaldSubmissionUFOSymposium.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:06, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: At a glance, more than half the article isn't even properly cited. 
I would also suggest that many of the claims put forth in the article come from unreliable sources. Riffraff913 (talk) 17:00, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: A bit late in response, but those are valid concerns. The entire article needs attention. Here's an example of the editing task ahead: the University of Arizona's web pages for the history of their atmospheric sciences and hydrology departments/programs (see here and here) make no mention at all of McDonald. Nothing. That seems odd, if not actually weird, especially if he was such an instrumental figure there. An explanation might be that the information is sourced solely to Ann Druffel, who should probably not be considered a reliable source for, well, anything (see this). Much of the information in this page is similarly attached to dubious sources. So here comes and lot of snipping, and probably a lot of 'citation needed' tags. JoJo Anthrax (talk) 14:38, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  Done with those edits for now. I remind everyone that this is supposed to be an encyclopedia, not a sensationalist, pro-woo tabloid. JoJo Anthrax (talk) 18:25, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem article