lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Biliblanket

message: This article does not include sufficient citations, and possibly contains original research.  Article does not follow encyclopedic writing style.  Additionally, it contains first person narrative and also contains personal suggestions.  Possible rewrite may be required.    Micrll (talk) 06:36, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: This

message: In addition to being tagged for 'condense', I'm not convinced a list of brands is encyclopedic so I moved this to talk RJFJR (talk) 16:32, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Brands

message: To improve this page I would add a few more sections to provide more information in an organized way about biliblankets, such as a section titled: Hyperbilirubinemia, Mechanism, Proper use, side effects, Advantages, disadvantages, History. Tvu2020 (talk) 20:34, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Foundations II 2020 Group [3] proposed edits

message: , , ,  As a member of WP:WikiProject Medicine I have volunteered to watch this article while it is a Wikipedia:Wiki Ed/UCSF/Foundations II (Summer 2020) assignment. See comments below. Feel free to ask me questions here or on my Talk page. David notMD (talk) 15:16, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Assignment ended with not contact from students. None of the students did any editing or commenting after August 5 even though the assignment was scheduled to run through August 21. David notMD (talk) 09:02, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Medicine 

message: Some of the recent referencing is to individual clinical trials, which WP:MEDRS frowns upon. Are there reviews that can be substituted? David notMD (talk) 17:07, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Replaced Efficacy content and refs for individual clinical trials with a review that was already cited elsewhere in the article. David notMD (talk) 09:01, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: The content in the subsections is so short that there is no reason to have subsection titles. David notMD (talk) 17:22, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed subsection titles. David notMD (talk) 09:00, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Efficacy section
Talk:To Fili Tis Zois (Movie)

message: To Fili Tis Zois (soundtrack) should be merged into To Fili Tis Zois.  It is a movie, soundtrack from the movie, and title song by Elena Paparizou.  There is no real reason to have them all on separate pages when it can be achieved with one article focusing on all of them.  Most international film articles have all the info on one page like is proposed here.   But since the title track is charting, I suggest creating a seperate page at To Fili Tis Zois (Elena Paparizou song) for it, leaving this article for the movie and soundtrack. Planecrazy22 (talk) 06:59, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: SORRY, SORRY, SORRY!  Again Sorry.  I just notice there is a film page already.  It was not linked on this page so I did not now.  Merge this article with To Fili Tis Zois (film).
We now have
*To Fili Tis Zois (film)
*To Fili Tis Zois (soundtrack)
*To Fili Tis Zois (Elena Paparizou song)
SORRY AGAIN. Planecrazy22 (talk) 07:15, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge To Fili Tis Zois (soundtrack) into To Fili Tis Zois
File talk:LungVolume.jpg

message: Yes it it true Docdave (talk) 03:05, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:   Vital capacity It is  sum of expiratory reserve volume andinspiatory reserve volume and tidal volume. Is it true?

message: looks like copied from PDF.
need higher file size to (copied from higher zoom) to get clearer pic. 128.125.28.186 (talk) 20:33, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  text is blurry.
Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/Mahmoud Ahmadinejad/Archive 4

message: Now that the lead is all sorted, I think we can move onto the "Usage of some sources by one of the editors which some other editors believe that do not verify the text" issue. This was added by Pejman47 when mediation started.
What I'd like to know is if there's still a dispute about this issue (a lot of things have changed since then), and whether this issue still needs to be pursued. I welcome all input, although especially Pejman's, for these questions. If it comes back that we need to discuss it, I will ask for specific details then. For now, I am merely trying to find out whether it's still an issue or not.
Cheers, Daniel 07:20, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Parties? Daniel 05:04, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I thought this was addressed to Pejman, but the resolution of the paragraph addresses most of my major concerns with the article.. --Nosfartu (talk) 00:08, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think most of it was removed when a couple of weeks ago the article was unlocked. Today and Tomorrow, I will look on the article and will delete all the stuff with poor sources or even the ones that doesn't verify the texts. --Pejman47 (talk) 15:21, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, in that case all issues have been addressed, so I am closing this case as successful. Thanks to all parties for their good-faithed participation, and I wish all of you well in your editing. Cheers, Daniel 00:08, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible new issue: Sources
Talk:Mr. Peabody and the Mermaid

message: The Fred Clark who played Basil the houseboy is a Black actor, not the Fred Clark pictured on this page. MyLolo76 (talk) 19:03, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The Fred Clark article has credited him as appearing in the film since 2005. , Please let us know the source of your assertion and we will change it. Sweetpool50 (talk) 19:59, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  AFI database entry for the film here shows that the person is Frederick Clarke. No picture, but a couple of other credits mention "Black butler" and "Black chauffeur". So  is correct in their complaint. I'll make the change. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 21:50, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong actor cited in cast
Talk:Bingham Purchase

message: I have done my best to find credible references for this article. There seems to be none available on the internet. I have e-mailed several maintainers of sites related to Maine geography and history trying to get more information. One woman provided me information, which corroborates the claims of this article, which she claims was sourced from the "the Gazetteer of the State of Maine", found in the Univ. of Maine Library at Farmington, Maine. As I cannot find anymore information on this source, I will not use it as a reference, however it is this source that affirms my belief in the truth of this article. I hope a better, more reliable source will be found in the future. Lex Kitten (talk) 07:38, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Base 64

message: Surely the "hash" (if that's the word) at the end of a video's URL on YouTube is in base 64? (A-Z (26), a-z (26), 0-9 (10), - and _ (2) (26 + 26 + 10 + 2 = 64) (allowing 281,474,976,710,656 (or 648) combinations) Not adding it into the article unless it can be confirmed.~~NaN 16:44, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube 

message: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Base64 - same thing.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.150.204.114 (talk) 10:48, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No Base64 is a method of encoding binary as 7-bit ascii characters. Base 64 is a mathematical number base. This was decided previously in the Base64 Talk page.-- Q Chris (talk) 16:01, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge this 

message: I suggest the notability issue is discussed here: Category talk:Positional numeral systems#Notability.--Noe (talk) 09:30, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Wikipedia talk:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive330

message: The fact that someone has not locked this page to end this mindless paranoia is a bit shocking. Dead issue is dead, and to stand by and watch fellow Wikipedians get abused like this just isn't cool. -- Ned Scott 08:10, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Second that. AgneCheese/Wine 08:45, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The issue is far from dead. We are still lacking a good and valuable editor. Who is very distressed by this debacle. Giano (talk) 08:48, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Let people give their opinions.  Once everyone has had their say and action (if any) is taken on the issue, everyone will move on on their own. Cla68 (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 09:08, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

message: I call for this page to be unprotected. This is a very important issue that people have been actively discussing, and for someone to come and shut down the discussion is inappropriate. Everyking (talk) 18:09, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Especially a newish admin who is involved in the debate. AniMate 18:12, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur. Protecting the page only fuels more animosity and accusations of "coverup". Videmus Omnia  Talk  18:13, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a thread on Mercury's talk page as well. I really do have to go now, and I wish I could help calm things down, but could someone restore my edits that Mercury removed? Carcharoth (talk) 18:15, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree that protection is ill-advised and removing talk page comments absolutely unacceptable. I thought I restored all the comments but I can go back and check. RxS (talk) 18:17, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I  restored your comments. Any other opinions on the page protection? If there's no consensus for it, the page shold be unprotected. RxS (talk) 18:23, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

text: Even with my intinal comment on this talk page, it does seem that giving people a place to vent is best option for damage control at this point. -- Ned Scott 03:46, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Page protection

message: Since !! is the subject of the original post I think they are the only person other than Durova who should be allowed to unblank it. I don't know their motives, and I don't care about their motives, but I think it should be allowed to stand. It is all fairly moot, now, and perhaps it would be best to let this part of the matter rest as is. LessHeard vanU (talk) 21:25, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As a lack of transparency seems to be a part of the issue at hand, I don't see how blanking or deleting this discussion would help matters. --健次(derumi)talk 03:51, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  User:!! has unblanked the original post by Durova
Talk:The Lutheran Evangelical Protestant Church

message: I see two problems with the article that lead to the tags in question:
# Most importantly, the article cites no independent sources; only LEPC websites and documents are cited.
# The article has been edited substantially by User:Lutheranepc. Based on that user name, there is likely a conflict of interest.
The primary sources tag can be cured by using outside sources. The POV tag can be cured by having more editors get involved and making sure that outside commentary/criticisms of the church, as warranted, are presented. —C.Fred (talk) 16:23, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for the name change, but note that a name change does not relieve User:HIS2008 of the conflict of interest. —C.Fred (talk) 16:15, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV/Primary sources tags 

message: Please note that citations have been added as requested. Thanks.HIS2008
Lutheranepc (talk) 15:50, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations-The Lutheran Evangelical Protestant Church
Talk:Beit Safafa

message: Pringle, 1997, p. 29 writes that   the village was granted  as a fief  to the Knights Hospitallers sometime before  September 1110... but the date on the source (Röhricht, 1893, RRH, pp. 12-13, no. 57) is Sept. 1109. Either this is a typo, the calendar was different (?) ..or the source say something in Latin that the village will be given as a fief in the next year.... Cheers,  Huldra (talk) 22:45, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Pringle is correct. 57 is a list of all of the gifts made throughout the year preceding the September 28, 1110 date for that year (omnia dona . . in toto regno adhuc facta:'all of the gifts hitherto made throughout  the kingdom' (of Jerusalem)).  The text opens in the present tense for that date, and then sums up the gifts in the past tense. That is presumably why Röhricht gives 1110 Sept 28 and glosses it (1109) by the preceding year.  The text represents a review and official 'confirmation' by Baldwin of the terrains gifted over an extensive period before the given date of registration (I guess).Nishidani (talk) 12:12, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typos... 
Talk:1994 AFL season

message: The ladder progression isn't accurate as, because of the bye, a different system was used. For example NM, even though only having four points
after round 2, was actually above Melb & Collingwood.
https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/118111292/13353655  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Local Potentate (talk • contribs) 05:09, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Ladder
Talk:Dawley

message: This section seems a bit vague. Does Madeley really have a distincitive dialect from that of the rest of Telford/East Shropshire? It's also unsourced. Asdfasdf1231234 (talk) 18:58, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The section does seem to have issues, and I have removed some content that I felt did not fit in the article.  The examples of the dialect given do seem reminiscent of other dialects from the West Midlands, so I am not sure about how unique/notable the dialect therefore is.  I am a bit concerned by the statement that "In the past, this has led to some discussion on whether the dialect could qualify as a language in its own right.", as it strikes me as being worded in a weaselly way.  Perhaps the dialect section could be pruned down further to remove unsourced statements and be converted into maybe just a short sentence/paragraph elsewhere in the article? Mouchoir le Souris (talk) 19:52, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've had an internet search and realistically we're never going to find reliable sources for the section, so I'm just going to go ahead and delete it. We can't have some person looking at the article taking the section seriously if we're not even sure any of it is true. Regards, Asdfasdf1231234 (talk) 20:36, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you may be right there, and therefore removing unsourceable statements would mean removing the whole lot, so the deletion has been the best course of action, and given the fairly old "Fact" tag in amongst it all, it seems no-one else so far had been successful at sourcing it. Mouchoir le Souris (talk) 22:16, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dialect
Talk:East Dereham

message: East Dereham is used by myself always in my literature (being historically correct for the most part of East Dereham's history). I also call England as Anglia sometimes. But this does in no means become automatically incorrect. Officialdom says the counties do not exist but how many people still use them in their postal addresses. So can we please leave the East Dereham alone, one it defines it as a seperate entity to West Dereham and the possible confusion with Wereham or Durham (which I find OFTEN)... East Dereham exists even if the Town Council doesn't like it. I lived in East Dereham all my life, I have never lived in Dereham. pebbens (talk) 23:45, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of the town
Talk:Negative selection (politics)

message: This principle is comparable to a plot twist in bad kung-fu movies: the sensei never teaches the student his very best move, so that if the student ever tries to depose the sensei, he can handily defeat him.  Before adding this to the article, however, a concrete example must be found.  I can't think of one.  Can anyone else?  --75.161.84.72 (talk) 09:00, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think one of the Kill Bill movies — where the technique is the eye-gouging move… Raifʻhār Doremítzwr (talk) 10:13, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Example

message: This is very similar to Scott Adams's Dilbert Principle based on the description of the article. 128.114.224.237 (talk) 02:25, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dilbert principle
Talk:Argyle

message: : The lake should be listed and linked on the Argyle page somewhere. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lake_Argyle 104.178.203.34 (talk) 22:08, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops, found it, sorry your system wouldn't let me delete the post104.178.203.34 (talk) 22:12, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Lake Argyle
Talk:Diacritics (journal)

message: Is this still ongoing? The last issue I can find on Jstor is from 2005...Zigzig20s (talk) 09:18, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  still being published? 
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/List of significant others of Friends (2nd nomination)

message: OK, so the page has been deleted. I'm fine with that. It's just that now there's almost a million links all over the place that lead back to the article that was deleted. That means that the links are red. Red links = messy articles. Can someone with AWB or another cool edit-speedying up device remove them? -- THE DARK LORD TROMBONATOR 09:21, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Chilhowie High School

message: High Schools are usually regarded as notable per WP:OUTCOMES, so I think an AfD would be more appropriate than a prod if you think this one should go.  Phil Bridger (talk) 10:02, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Main Page alternatives/(with list of the day)

message: I couldn't adjust the right margin for the new box (Today's featured list), and resorted to changing the width to 101.5%, which is a dubious fix.  I have no idea if it shows up right in browsers other than IE7.  The Transhumanist (talk) 10:07, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  right margin problem 

message: Isn't this useless, now that the MP has TFL on Monday and Friday? 24.68.146.148 (talk) 16:35, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Useless
Talk:Featherstone

message: Is the population for Featherstone the ward population because I wouldn't have thought Featherstone to be so big. Mtaylor848 (talk) 20:59, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population 

message: Featherstone Rovers, wasn't founded until 1902, and appears to have no links to the earlier rugby union (RU) club. However, I have contributed to an article about James "Jimmy" Metcalfe, and I have found details of him playing for Yorkshire (RU) in 1896/7 while playing at Featherstone (RU), does anyone have any information about the RU club of the 1800s in Featherstone. Best Regards. DynamoDegsy (talk) 13:35, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Featherstone RUFC

message: Is the very recent series of explosions at Welburn Transport notable? I have sources: . -- OsirisV (talk) 00:47, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explosions 
Talk:Lombardy wine

message: The Adda does not travel from west to east (up the mountains), but from east to west down into Lake Como. And the vineyards in this area are located for DOC wines up to a maximum of 700 meters = about 2300 feet, and for DOCG wines in the subzone Maroggia up to max. 550 meters, in Sassella and Grumello up to max. 600 meters, in Inferno up to max. 500 meters and Valgella up to 650 meters.Details of the responsible consortium. The minimum aging period for Valtellina Superiore Riserva is 36 months, not 48 months DISCIPLINARE DI PRODUZIONE DEI VINI A DENOMINAZIONE DI ORIGINE CONTROLLATA E GARANTITA "VALTELLINA SUPERIORE" see Articolo 5 at the end.
The minimum alcohol content of Sforzato DOCG is 14% and not 14.5% DISCIPLINARE DI PRODUZIONE DEI VINI A DENOMINAZIONE DI ORIGINE CONTROLLATA E GARANTITA "SFORZATO DI VALTELLINA" O "SFURSAT DI VALTELLINA" see Articolo 6. In all three wines, the DOC-wine Rosso di Valtellina, and the both DOCG-wines Valtellina Superiore and Sforzato di Valtellina, 10% foreign red grapes are allowed (see Articolo 2). The condition is, that they are not aromatic grapes and that the grapes are authorized for wine production in Lombardy (see Articolo 2). Opas Eifel (talk) 21:32, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Valtellina
Talk:Sergio del Valle Jiménez

message: In article Bay of Pigs Invasion, amended and clarified the titles of del Valle and Almeida in Cuban order of battle. Cut out following Yahoo obituary quoted text and copied it to Sergio del Valle Jiménez biography talk page. (quote)"Cuban Gen. del Valle dies (circa 11-16-07, no birth date given)". News. Yahoo!. Retrieved on 2007-11-16. "After Batista fled and the rebels took control of the island on Jan. 1, 1959, del Valle held various positions in Cuba's Revolutionary Armed Forces. He was army chief of staff when a US-backed exile army tried unsuccessfully to invade the Bay of Pigs in 1961, as well as the following year when the US discovery of Soviet missiles on the island pushed the world to the brink of nuclear war. The Soviets eventually removed the missiles. Del Valle was also interior minister in the late 1960s and health minister from 1979 to 1986"(end quote).PeterWD (talk) 00:41, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Sergio del Valle Jiménez/Bay of Pigs Invasion
Talk:SFX Hall

message: This reeks of copyvio, although Google searches don't bring it up. The theatre's official website isn't working, and I assume the copyvio is from there. Any ideas? Removing all the advert is going to reduce the article to almost nothing. Cricketgirl (talk) 10:16, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I found no copyvios using this tool. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 15:11, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio
Talk:Black Diamond

message: I have heard that Bamboo Charcoal Soap is called Black Diamond.  I can't confirm it, though. Jason Young - Denmark, Western Australia (talk) 09:29, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bamboo Charcoal 

message: This article refers to a massive 'black diamond' being sold at Sothebys
https://www.sothebys.com/en/buy/auction/2022/the-enigma-555-55-carat-fancy-black-diamond
and in this article
https://interestingengineering.com/a-mysterious-55555-carat-black-diamond-will-be-up-for-auction-soon
This doesn't match any of the possibilities in the disambiguation list. 
Ender's Shadow Snr (talk) 19:02, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-synthetic black diamond
Talk:Grange-over-Sands

message: This link was added to the article after discussion on the WP Reliable Sources Noticeboard. See: WP:RSN exercise. No information from the CCHT link has been put into the body of the article in the form of citations because it has not yet been verified for 100% accuracy by the Victoria County History project for Cumbria. (This will take some years to do).  Laplacemat (talk) 10:46, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  CCHT external link 

message: A large number of websites contain an incorrect spelling duplicating an error present in Ofcom's (previously Oftel) UK area code list for the last decade.
015395 was listed as Grange-Over-Sands in the official UK area code list and only recently corrected to Grange-over-Sands, see their Errata. 212.139.105.91 (talk) 08:34, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Phone code
Talk:Hadleigh, Suffolk

message: This needs updating badly, any Hadleigh folk willing to share their knowledge with the wide world? x  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.26.160.124 (talk) 19:21, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Ancient market town, and yet all anyone seems to know about it is a couple of badly written paragraphs of hearsay. Total crap.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.140.185.201 (talk) 22:48, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Typical Wikiality
Talk:List of capitals in Malaysia

message: For those who edit this article, please take note that Muar is NOT the royal capital of Johor, as the official residential palace of the Sultan of Johor is located at Bukit Serene, Johor Bahru, not at Muar. True, there is a palace at Muar, but that palace is not the official palace but rather a royal retreat (Istana Hinggap).
The status of Muar as the royal town was due to the royal opening of the township by Maharaja Abu Bakar and was named as Bandar Maharani (Empress Town), but no official residential palace was constructed there. - Hezery99 (talk) 07:32, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Muar is the royal town on Johor, not the royal capital