lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Template talk:Audi vehicles timeline (Europe) 1965–2019

message: The Audi TT is available as a Coupe (as well as a roadster) - can someone please update the template to show this?  Thanks  -- Teutonic Tamer 20:37, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: TT is also a Coupe

message: This timeline seems to have become a bit inconsistent lately: the A4/S4 and A6/S6 models have been divided into their different generations, but the 80/90, 100/200, A3/S3 and A8/S8 haven't.  Also, both "platform codes" and typ numbers are used to disambiguate different generations. Letdorf (talk) 12:28, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Give me time - I am trying to sort this.  Re the platform vs typ codes - some don't have platform codes (only typ codes, but these are less well-known).  If I do happen to "forget", kindly message me on my talk page, thanks. -- Teutonic_Tamer (talk to Teutonic_Tamer) 14:52, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Consistency

message: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Audi_vehicles_timeline_(Europe)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.8.243.219 (talk) 17:04, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please add the new RS4 on the timeline 

message: This template is such a mess, it should be made simpler and more easy to understand. dabean (talk) 13:44, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  What a mess 

message: Did Audi really stop selling big cars in Europe? That's Your edit. --95.24.66.198 (talk) 02:42, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Big cars ceased?
Talk:Division Street (Manhattan)

message: *Division Street may have little significance, but it is important when it comes to the Lower East Side. The Second Avenue El use to run above Division Street between Allen Street and Bowery. The Manhattan Railway Corporation's former headquarters are located at Division Street. The Chinatown commuter buses terminated at/near Division Street and the Chinatown greenmarket used to be at Division Street. Therefore with so many relics of history buried in this street, I believe it is best not to delete the article, but to keep it and let other people add to the article.HManat32 (talk) 20:43, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
File talk:Debiansid-praka-dec2008.png

message: This is a shot from my current Debian Sid(unstable) apt-pinned with Lenny(testing) and Experimental repositories.There is no copyrighted wallpaper etc according to my best of knowledge.
This shot is in here for replacing  as accusation that the wallpaper containing is copyrighted.Praka123 (talk) 20:39, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Largespine velvet dogfish

message: This article was based on the corresponding article at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, neither of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  -- ascidian | talk-to-me 00:30, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Template talk:Stourbridge Town Branch Line

message: I've applied full protection to the page in accordance with the protection policy so that the edit warring occurring on the page can cease and a discussion take place so that both parties can make an agreement, rather than having some sort of tug-of-war game. The protection will expire in 5 days, but if the dispute is resolved by then I can unprotect it earlier. Note that protection doesn't mean the protecting administrator (me) endorses the current version, nor does it mean that either version of the page is correct or incorrect. You have 5 days to sort it out. Spebi 20:44, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Protection is a good idea, but the  tag needs to be in noinclude brackets to prevent it wrongly appearing in Stourbridge Town Branch Line. Thanks. – Tivedshambo (talk) 15:29, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: moved. — Carl (CBM · talk) 16:23, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Full protection 

message: Does this page really need to be here? The information can easily be displayed on the original template. Nathan A RF (talk) 17:08, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delete?
Talk:Norham Castle

message: http://www.flickr.com/photos/britishlibrary/11297911133/
©Geni (talk) 23:33, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Very useful, now added to the article. Nev1 (talk) 18:40, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Plan of the castle
Talk:André Brassard

message: Dude was nominated for a Palme d'Or in 1974 and is considered the premier Canadian stage director. I found that out in about 30 seconds of searching. It takes about 10 seconds to PROD something. Hope the remaining 20 seconds was worthwhile.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.69.39.11 (talk) 13:33, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Note to deleters
Talk:Plantar fibromatosis

message: Most of the references are unformatted and therefore hard to assess. For Journal references, a  template would be helpful, and  for the web pages. JFW | T@lk 20:57, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll get to referencing the templates now. Thanks for your input,-xC- 21:27, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: Many nonsurgical treatments of DD have been tried—radiation, dimethyl sulfoxide, vitamin E cream, ultrasound, physical therapy, steroids, interferon, and antigout medicines—but to no avail. In addition, several attempts have been made to chemically dissolve the affected tissue. In 1907, Langemark tried using fibrinolysin; in 1931, Hesse used pepsin; and in 1965, Bassot used trypsin mixed with hyaluronidase. In many cases, the condition rapidly recurred, leading to general disappointment with this type of therapy. Hueston reports that intralesional injections of triamcinolone acetate controlled a Dupuytren’s nodule in his own palm.
Since they're so closely related, should I add in these as well? On the other hand, what has not been proven unsuccessful specifically for LD shouldn't be included. Suggestions?-xC- 14:58, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  DD treatments 

message: The treatment section is missing a lot of citations and needs a good re-write and tidying up.  Dr.khatmando (talk) 05:31, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Treatment section
Talk:National Association of Colored Women's Clubs

message: Should also be linked to larger issue of Black women's club movement.--Parkwells (talk) 21:01, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs sources and citations

message: Hi Wikipedians!
I noticed a typo in this sentence under the History heading: "The National Federation of Colored Women’s Club was the result of that meeting, with Mrs. Booker T. Washington at its head. However, another National organization, the Women’s Loyal Union,[5] with Mrs. Cook (née Helen Appo Cook) as President existed at Washington and the women soon realized that two organizations so identically similar could not work harmoniously as separate units." 
Mrs. Cook was actually the President of the Colored Women's League and the National League of Colored Women and not the Women's Loyal Union. The president of the Woman's Loyal Union was Victoria Earle Matthews. The Colored Women's League and the National Federation of Afro-American Women merged on July 21, 1896 to create the National Association of Colored Women, which later became the National Associaton of Colored Women's Clubs.
Thanks, Hannaharchibald (talk) 16:00, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong Club Title under the History Heading
Talk:The Straits – White Bay North

message: I think the map is outdated. The election districts have been changed in 2007. This very riding has added 5% of an adjacent riding. Can someone please draw a new map? And then the colour needs to be changed to orange of course. :-) Ds77 (talk) 16:35, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know if the map is outdated or not, it was created after the last election though and it doesn't look any different then CBCs map. As for the colour, the use of red has nothing to do with who represents the district. Newfoundlander&Labradorian (talk) 16:52, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

text: No they were changed prior to the election. Newfoundlander&Labradorian (talk) 22:52, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Map
Talk:S&S Cycle

message: I have begun linking this article elsewhere on the wiki. These articles now link here:
*Blue Island, Illinois
*V-twin
*American IronHorse
Thanks for your help. Corey Salzano (talk) 15:03, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Orphan template

message: How can i ID my s&s engine? 2600:1015:B019:CDF7:3980:8785:295:8DFC (talk) 14:52, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Identify a engine
Talk:Dental specialties

message: Vote keep: dental specialties vary by jurisdiction and there are important legal consequences for those  dentists who claim to be a specialist. the list on the dentistry article is complete for USA, but lacking for those in the EU where EU law defines the specialties. I imagine the situation for dental specialists is legally complex elsewhere in the world, and would merit a seperate page to outline the different specialties by jurisdiction. Ashley Payne (talk) 21:24, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Mamas & Papas

message: I was directed to this page when I entered a search for the 60s rock group, and was amazed, to say the least.
The text is lifted in its entirety from an online version of newspaper The Independent.
And while a link to the company's official site might be in order, one to a "Careers" section of that site reveals a decidedly POV hand. 
I'm submitting for deletion. Wikipedia isn't a marketplace.
PacificBoy 21:26, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Recommending for deletion
Talk:Sarah Mlynowski

message: I think Magic in Manhattan is important enough to have its own article on Wikipedia.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.184.224.135 (talk) 13:15, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Magic in Manhattan 

message: Sarah has published 5 books (soon to be 6) in the Whatever After series, it is unclear to me why these are not listed. 72.209.224.118 (talk) 01:26, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whatever After
Wikipedia talk:Correspondence off-wiki

message: OK, per WT:PRIVATE#Alernative #2 split to new proposal I've re-split out this proposal from it's diametric opposite, on which WP:Consensus is unlikely to form. I see no point in the endless edit war swapping between the two proposals on the page, and the latest excuse was to declare this proposal invalid because of an ArbCom decision, by an editor who knows ArbCom doesn't create policy. So this seems the only sane way forward at this point, even though these will simply end up competing essays, I expect. -- Kendrick7talk 18:47, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: New proposal

message: I oppose this proposal. I actually think off-wiki correspondence should be considered private, i.e. what happens off-wiki stays off-wiki. If the person who wrote an item wanted it to be known, they would have posted it on-wiki. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 20:08, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm reminded the the old Marx brother's exchange: Cam you keep a secret? Yes! Well, so can I! If you don't want something to be known, don't tell anyone, or only tell someone you trust. I don't feel editors are under any obligation not to repeat what they hear off wiki. -- Kendrick7talk 21:13, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

text: This looks like a POV-fork of the proposed private correspondence policy.  Of course it's silly to try to stop people discussing Wikipedia off-wiki, or to attempt to declare such discussion non-private. --Tony Sidaway 10:42, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmmmm, you make one good point -- private is really the wrong word here. The real issue is it shouldn't be considered confidential. I'll try changing the wording. -- Kendrick7talk 17:23, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

text: No, seriously, this is an obvious and blatant lift from one draft of the rejected Private correspondence policy.  I've tagged it as rejected for that reason.  Let's move on. --Tony Sidaway 18:48, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's rather quite opposite of that proposal, as anyone can see. I agree this isn't getting much traction. I think it's too soon to reject this out of hand, but if no one else agrees with me on this I guess this won't go anywhere. -- Kendrick7talk 19:05, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oppose
Talk:Office Romance

message: There seems to be a remake, set in modern Russia of the 2011 (Office Romance Present Day, Office Romance Present Day). --Bk1 168 (talk) 01:03, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remake 
Talk:Antigonish (provincial electoral district)

message: I'm adding this to talk page to explain edit I just made in article. When reading the article, I noticed that an MLA, John L. McIsaac, who died in office on March 24, 1941 was listed as having been elected in the October 1941 election and served in 42nd Assembly. This would be kind of hard to accomplish almost 7 months after his death. According to the electoral history for the riding, the candidate that ran for the Liberals in the 1941 general election was a man named John A. MacIsaac. It was this John A. MacIsaac that was elected and served in the 42nd Assemly, but he too died in office on June 1, 1942. I'm thinking the similar names, both deaths while in office and Elections Nova Scotia referring to the winner in the 1941 official records as John MacIssac with no middle initial has caused some confusion that has led to the MLA who actually won the 1941 election being left out as if he never existed. The electoral history pdf above clearly shows this and gives the dates that each MLA died in office.
This book] that provides a biography for all MLAs elected up to 1984 also clearly shows the error in the article. There are two separate entries, and the article for John A. MacIssac on page 134 clearly says he was elected for the Antigonish riding in 1941 and died June 1, 1942. Page 323 lists the 42nd Assembly where the death of John A. MacIsaac on June 1, 1942 is again mentioned, and page 348 is a list of all MLAs for Antigonish and again there is clearly two separate names J.L. MacIssac and John A. MacIsaac. I will edit the article to reflect what the sources say. It's not like I'm just making this up, it can all be verified by taking a quick look at what I provided here. I will even add an article for those involved so that the correct info is in the articles. Cmr08 (talk) 02:59, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  MLA missing from list of MLAs 
Talk:Cape Breton Nova

message: Rated class = stub today because there is very little descriptive text.  Also can somebody please add a caption to the map image, or change to a better one?  I know it's Cape Breton Is. plus something from the mainland, but the average reader will just see random lines.  PKT(alk) 14:34, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Chester-St. Margaret's

message: There are two tables for "Nova Scotia general election, 2003" but they have different results. One is probably mislabeled? B.S. Lawrence (talk) 20:22, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Corrected.  The latest election was in 2006.  PKT 20:55, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in elections section
Talk:Somerset Butler, 1st Earl of Carrick

message: There is confusion among the sources about the children. 
*Edmund Lodge (1832) says Margaret was born 30 January 1749, she married Earl Belmore and died January 1777. Henrietta was the twin of Pierce and born 15 August 1750, she married Viscount Mountgarret and died 20 June 1785.
*thepeerage.com says Margaret was born 23 January 1748, she married Earl Belmore and died April 1775. It does not give dates for Henrietta but says she married Viscount Mountgarret.
*Debrett's (1838) says Henrietta was born 30 January 1748, she married Earl Belmore and died January 1774. Margaret was the twin of Pierce and born 15 August 1750, she married Viscount Mountgarret - the date of death is unspecified.
I am unable to access the fourth source for this article, George E. Cokayne (1887), so I am unsure which of the three accounts above are correct. Or perhaps all three are wrong. A further level of confusion is added by Debrett's with a mention of another child born in 1747; if that is correct the January 1748 date for the third child gives a pregnancy of less than 25.5 weeks (assuming both the second and third were with his wife). While modern technology can sustain some children born at 22 or 23 weeks, it is highly unlikely a child of the 18th Century would have survived. If the details of the second child are accurate that would suggest 1749 as the correct birth year for the third child.
Is there any other source material available that can shed light on this problem? Road Wizard (talk) 00:42, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have restored the  template to the article as the issue does not seem to have been addressed. Road Wizard (talk) 13:54, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discrepancy on children
Talk:Yarmouth (provincial electoral district)

message: ::Is is conventional to record the swing from the previous general election for ridings in which there has been an intervening by-election, or should it be recorded with reference to that by-election's results. I've seen it done both ways, but IMHO I'm inclined to record the swing from the previous general election. Thoughts? Absintheparadox (talk) 01:14, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Question about swing %
Talk:Ganga Expressway

message: Dear  and  The name of Allahabad was changed to Prayagraj by the Government of Uttar Pradesh in October 2018. So, these two are same and can be used interchangeably. Aakash Singh India (talk) 09:54, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: @Aakash Singh India The Allahabad->Prayagraj->Allahabad edits and reverts are not really productive to me and I currently see a net negative in the time and effort I put into it. So, I'm going to refrain reverting those edits. Also, the discussion about Allahabad vs Prayagraj belongs in the Talk:Allahabad page. — DaxServer (talk to me) 11:03, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Allahabad or Prayagraj
Talk:Eleanor of England, Countess of Bar

message: http://www.bl.uk/catalogues/illuminatedmanuscripts/ILLUMIN.ASP?Size=mid&IllID=49988  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.136.129.2 (talk) 17:48, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: The Eleanor who married Llewellyn ap Owain can be found mentioned in Victorian sources, as an ancestress of Owain Glyndwr and Owen Tudor, but this link is considered dubious in more recent sources. See Alison Weir's Britain's Royal Families, page 82, which doubts the younger Eleanor existed. Panton doesn't mention any descendants beyond the younger Eleanor and doesn't seem to have picked up on that claim's dubiousness. If this content is to be included then we need either (1) more solid sourcing, or (2) to include Weir's skepticism.  DrKay (talk) 16:53, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: This used to be in the article (cited to Weir): . It was removed in stages:  I'm fine with either of the suggestions above, or with its removal. Celia Homeford (talk) 13:02, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious Welsh descendants
Talk:Henry Lawson Way

message: The references given for this article do not support the claims re the ends of the Henry Lawson Way, and neither does Google maps. Does anyone have a reliable reference? Downsize43 (talk) 07:02, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Have now found a suitable Ref:
https://www.rms.nsw.gov.au/business-industry/partners-suppliers/lgr/documents/classified-roads-schedule.pdf
Forbes end:
Gazetted road 236
HENRY LAWSON WAY-From the Mid Western Highway (HW6) at Bogo Bogalong, west of Grenfell to the Gooloogong-Forbes Road (MR56) at Forbes.
Young end:
Gazetted road 239
HENRY LAWSON WAY - From Elizabeth Street (Olympic Highway MR78) at Young via Iandra Street, and Tyagong to Camp Street (Mid Western Highway HW6) at Grenfell.
Downsize43 (talk) 23:39, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reliable references
Talk:Lachlan Valley Way

message: Put this in Feedback a week ago - so far no response.
"Unable to reconcile the statement that the Lachlan Valley Way starts at Booligal with other online references. Bonzle shows it starting at the intersection with Kidman Way, north-east of Hillston. Google maps confirms this view, but with the section between Lake Cargelio and Forbes bearing other names, except for a short section east of Euabalong." Downsize43 (talk) 11:41, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Start of Lachlan Valley Way 

message: I am working on a new section - Major intersections and towns - for this article (in my sandbox). May take a week or two, depending on other tasking given to me by SHMBO. Downsize43 (talk) 13:11, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Added new section "Major intersections and towns". Still needs work, if anyone can help.Downsize43 (talk) 00:46, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Replaced with MOS:RJL compliant Interchanges table. Downsize43 (talk) 00:11, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Acting on advice from experienced editors I have redlinked the names of localities with no WP articles, where road junctions occur in those localities, and have added references, except for one - see below.
Downsize43 (talk) 00:34, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major intersections and towns 

message: Google Maps shows the Forbes boundary just to the east of this intersection. It shows "Wowingragong" to the south-west of the intersection, and "Bundaburrah" further to the south-west. A Google Maps search for "Wowingragong" returns ""Wowingragong, Bundaburrah" with no locality border, ie. a suburb of "Bundaburrah". A search for "Bundaburrah" does not work, probably due to bad map data.
The Geographical Names Board of NSW shows "Bundaburrah" as an official place name, assigned on 15 July, 2011. It has no record of "Wowingragong". 
For now I have settled on "Bundaburrah", but cannot provide a simple reference. Downsize43 (talk) 00:34, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Location for intersection of Lachlan Valley Way and Newell Highway 7 km west of Forbes