Talk:Microstrip antenna

message: Some diagrams of the half-patch and Inverted F antenna layouts would be useful.  It would help on discussing the shorting planes.Lukeseed (talk) 22:07, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diagrams 

message: Hello, why it is called an inverted F antenna when the shape can be mirrored? Then it should be called an F antenna...
--131.180.137.83 (talk) 14:33, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inverted F Antenna 

message: could be anyone to help me in order to know deeper about analysis of microstrip single-element??? i mean, a patch that is rectangular/square in shaped.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 161.139.100.202 (talk) 21:01, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  help me .... 

message: This page, and Patch antenna cover largely the same ground. As both are quite short, wouldn't it make sense to concentrate the information in a single page? Patch antennas are by far the most common form, but microstrip antenna is more general - so I'm open to suggestions as to which page should be merged into which. Either way, I think one should ultimately redirect to the other. GyroMagician (talk) 13:58, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with the merger.  It looks to me from the sources that, as you say, Microstrip antenna is the more general term; a patch antenna is an individual element while a microstrip antenna can include an array of patches.  So I would think that Patch antenna should be merged here. --ChetvornoTALK 16:10, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

text: Please read my suggestion again. I asked for opinion, because as the pages currently stand, they largely say the same thing. If you would like to add to either or both pages, to expand the information, that would be helpful. GyroMagician (talk) 16:52, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

text: Microstrip is just a type of transmission line. Anything usable on this page should be copied to patch antenna and this page should be redirected. Readro (talk) 18:19, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

text: oppose I disagree with merger as it is better to have different articles that are much more targeted.  That will help our readers more find what they were looking for rather than wading though heaps of text.  Examples, application and theory details will be different.  Splitting articles is what helps Wikipedia grow and become better.  Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:56, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge this page with [[Patch antenna]]? 

message: The clarification needed note under the 'Other types' section is about the 'The PIFA is shown from a side view in Figure 4.' statement. This statement is a copy-paste from the fifth reference (antenna-theory), along with the preceding sentences. It seems that it should be reworded (possibly with an image from that site so that the reference to the figure makes more sense). 130.191.160.112 (talk) 19:40, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification needed - Fig 4 

message: Reference 1 is broken
:fixed Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:46, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Broken Link

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Microstrip antenna. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120119215044/http://www.orbanmicrowave.com/The_Basics_Of_Patch_Antennas.pdf to http://www.orbanmicrowave.com/The_Basics_Of_Patch_Antennas.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:54, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: replaced by http://orbanmicrowave.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/Orban-Patch-Antennas-2009-rev.pdf Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:38, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018)