lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Longue Vue Island

message: This page is coming along very nicely! Kukini 07:20, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Nice work!!!

message: I decided to make this page because this island used to belong to my grandfather and my mom's side of the family. And, I had noticed that it had a spot in the Wiki entry for the National Registry of Historic Places. I decided to make an entry to fill that gap, but there probably can't be much more information unless the current owner decides to add more. I have only been there twice since it was sold,  and I don't remember what it really looks like since I was young when it was sold too. Everything listed is also my knowledge too, and the pictures are postcards that my family owns. Farmer88 21:26, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  I have almost as much information as I could know 

message: You seem to have left out which side of the border the island is on. I assume that since it's in the National Register of Historic Places, it must be on the US side – and the flag in the picture suggests that too – but the article should say that. Kelisi 01:06, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Country? 

message: I put that tidbit near the top of the page. Farmer88 15:27, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thanks for mentioning that
Talk:Serous membrane

message: I will hopefully be covering these in the next couple of weeks -- Serephine / talk - 07:21, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok finally finished - added and restructured, but kept most of what was already existing. -- Serephine / talk - 06:18, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Topics to expand upon
Talk:Rock for Light

message: I am starting this discussion pre-emptively. The statement "It is also available on several file sharing websites and mp3 blogs" is a valid, relevent and sourced fact and should not be removed. Regardless of the fact that the sources are things that might under normal conditions seem unreliable (blogs to be specific), they are direct, tangeable evidence of this albums original mixes appearing on the internet.
--Iron Chef (talk) 00:12, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  File Sharing
Talk:Black Dots

message: How is this dub?? --209.163.119.122 (talk) 04:14, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre 
Category talk:Human name disambiguation pages

message: What's the story with disambiguation pages for given names?  Take for example the Larry page: The only ones that should definitely be in there IMHO are:
*Larry Fine, one of the Three Stooges [and even then, I'm not convinced this one should be there]
*Cyclone Larry, the category 2 cyclone that made landfall in Australia on March 18, 2006.
*Larry of Ed and Larry on The West Wing
It seems likely that people will search for them with the name "Larry".  The others are just a collection of people who happen to have Larry as their first name, and it seems unlikely anyone would look for them under their given name.
Does anyone have any suggestions for where I should voice a proposal to remove disambiguation links for people based solely on their given name? Chovain 03:50, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been discussed at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages)#Hndis needs its own Manual -- JHunterJ 23:53, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Given name disambiguation pages 

message: I don't see why this page exists. How many people look at it? What is the point of it? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.34.49.241 (talk) 18:52, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does this page actually have a point 

message: Despite :Category:surnames is belonged under this category, why :Category:given names isn't subcategory of this?--Ræv (talk) 04:58, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Category:Surnames should not be a subcategory. Back on August 3, 2007, a user added "Category:Lists of ambiguous human names" to "Category:Surnames" without any discussion, and I would have corrected that at once if I had been watching. As it is, I just corrected it. Please read MOS:DP#Given names or surnames to see the reason for this. Chris the speller (talk) 17:57, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Given names? 

message: When we have more than one Rebecca Grant, actress, could we list middle names on the disamb pages to more quickly direct the humans to the sites more relevant to their interests? Hcobb (talk) 17:51, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Middle names? 

message: There appears to be two styles for presenting disambig pages:
* One applies Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Disambiguation_pages#Linking_to_a_primary_topic to be used for displaying people's names, considering the first article of the name (without a parens identifier) to be the "main" topic and other uses of the name "subtopics", such as: this version
* Another lists all uses of the name in a list, like this version
What is your recommended approach?
If it's a list of all uses, rather than following main/subtopic guidelines, I volunteer to tackle reversion of the disambig page formats assigned to this category over a period of a couple of weeks or so. 
If it's the use of main/subtopic, I'll revert the Samuel Hawkes (disambiguation) page.--CaroleHenson (talk) 21:43, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question about formatting of the disambig pages for peoples names
Talk:Government and politics of Vancouver

message: this page seems redundant and awkward. why is there a Mayor subsection? why isn't that stuff covered in the Sam Sullivan? or in Vancouver municipal election, 2005? or in Non-Partisan Association? Also on a slighty different note, why does the Vancouver municipal election, 2005 have a page, and the 2002 election doesn't? 2002 stuff doesn't belong in here. Geedubber 01:34, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Basically, all this stuff used to be on the main Vancouver page.  It was taking up way to much room, so it needed to be moved to a new page.  That is what I did.  Sure, the 2002 election needs a page but I have been too busy to make one.  Can you do it? Canuck89 03:29, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

text: IMO, I think a  would make more sense for the Mayor subsection. Or a . Or both. Buchanan-Hermit™..SCREAM!!!.... 03:57, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree considering those are only short term solutions. There have been many political elections, mayors, scandals, political upsets and actions occur in Vancouver, and there will be many more in the future. This section should comprise a summary of all past and future notable political events in Vancouver. The only unfortunate thing about this article is that it only has events from the last couple of years. Ideally this article should be expanded to give a history of Politics in Vancouver and then include internal links for the reader who wishes to read more about a certain area covered. Mkdwtalk 01:41, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: I am not a fan of this page
Talk:Boundary Bay Airport

message: I recently made some changes to this page, specifically a brief summary of its wartime and military history. It seems a bot believes that the material was cut & pasted from this page. The page itself specifically states that an "edited passage from Wikipedia provides an excellent summary of the station's history," so the source seems to come from Wikipedia and not the other way around. Blotto adrift (talk) 03:25, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: See my reply on Talk:Canadian_Forces_Station_Ladner#Copyright. EvergreenFir (talk) 03:53, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: It's always good to be careful for copyright issues. Having looked at the listing, I've removed the copyright problem tag for now pending any evidence that they had the content before we did. The oldest archived version of their page dates to mid-2009 (), and it already included clear language indicating that content had been copied from Wikipedia, with the language "An edited passage from Wikipedia provides an excellent summary of the station's history." and quotation marks. If there is other suggestion of copying, that's worth investigating, but some indication of where the problem may lie - if not in that extensive quote - would help complete that evaluation. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:57, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright

message: FYI: The 67knots link near the bottom of the page ends up at a porn site...
64.46.3.50 (talk) 02:35, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  67knots link near the bottom of the page goes to a porn site
Talk:Matthias Platzeck

message: Addition of "radical" by 84.61.9.8 to characterise the Greens should probably be removed. See also other edits http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&target=84.61.9.8 --Espoo 07:54, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mel Byars

message: WP:VAIN Self-posted bio.  The subject seems sufficiently famous to be in Wikipedia.  However, it is against Wikipedia policy to post one's own biography. Delete or keep? --Nagle 07:55, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Mel, I'm writing a blog post about On/Off, because it has dated very badly in an amusing way. Goodreads calls the book New Electronic Products: Design, Technology, and Materials, with a completely different cover design to the standard image of a transparent Apple CRT. Was this an early draft, or is it a separate book that isn't listed here? Also, what did you actually do? The book is just a lot of advertising shots of products with short captions taken from press releases. It didn't require a writer. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 13:53, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Turkish Australians

message: Historical note: Turkey was not an "axis" power during the First World War as the Axis only existed during the Second World War (and consisted of Germany and Italy, with Japan tacked on as well). Turkey was a nonbelligerent power in the Second World War, but declared war on Germany just in time to "win". The side on which the Ottoman Empire (as against Turkey, they're two different powers) fought in the First World War is often referred to as the "Central Powers". However, be careful even saying that "Turkey" was part of this grouping, as the Republic of Turkey didn't exist at the time. BigHaz 09:36, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Axis" 

message: What do you mean by "Culturally Muslim" under religion? Several flaws have been placed on this issue. Firstly, being a Muslim is being a follower of Islam, a universal religion, and there are Muslims of different races all over the world. Islam doesn't not belong to one particular race. Secondly, not all Turks are Muslims - there are many among the minority groups who are Christians, Jews and even Atheists en:Turkish people. Thus, I've decided to replace "Culturally Muslim" to "Sunni Islam" since that the great majority of Turks in Australia, like the rest of the world, are Sunni Muslims. Besides, we are not sure whether all Turks are Muslims. --124.183.222.67 (talk) 03:39, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Culturally Muslim

message: Reliable sources please.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.108.33.44 (talk) 05:31, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Miranda Kerr

message: I will be trying to improve/expand this article in the next few days; I would appreciate any help/support from other users as this article requires quite a lot of clean-up.Turco85 (Talk) 18:56, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expanding and improving the article
Talk:Lantian Man

message: What is meant by "ancestral human" in the opening paragraph?  If it means "ancestor of humans" then we shouldn't state it so directly in light of recent research.  Quoting from the Peking Man article:
Some Chinese paleoanthropologists have asserted in the past that the modern Chinese (and possibly other ethnic groups) are descendants of Peking Man. However, modern genetic research does not support this hypothesis. A recent study undertaken by Chinese geneticist Jin Li showed that the genetic diversity of modern Chinese people is well within the whole world population. This shows that there could not have been any inter-breeding between modern human immigrants to East Asia and Homo erectus, such as Peking Man, and affirms that the Chinese are descended from Africa, like all other modern humans, in accordance with the Recent single-origin hypothesis.[8][9][10] However, some paleontologists still see continuity in skeletal remains.[11]
I'll slap a dubious tag on for now. Readin (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Modified accordingly. Ekem (talk) 00:30, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ancestral Human? 

message: At no place in the scientific literature do I see Lantian man described as a "subspecies" of Homo erectus. Kortoso (talk) 18:51, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subspecies?
Talk:Louis-Alexandre Expilly de la Poipe

message: Afraid I felt it necessary to tweak some recent edits - 
*Lyon is not the same place as Léon and not in Finistère..
*Changed 'associated' back to 'identified' because I haven't yet managed to establish (more reading needed!) whether he really was actively Girondist, or just got labelled as such. (Note French WP uses vague englobé) It isn't a perfect solution, but I haven't thought of a better one yet.
*I can now see that my original link for "refractory" wasn't clear enough, but I don't think the Wiktionary definition covered this, so have added a footnote instead.  
*Have gone back to French département, since in this context I feel it could be confusing to have the less obvious (even in English) spelling - might make people wonder if it's some other kind of department!--HJMG 08:05, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Fine-tuning
Talk:Hugo, Oklahoma

message: Its mention is deserved, just not in the geography section.  When this article is expanded, I'm sure someone will find a home for it. Dirtydan667 14:45, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Located 4 miles southwest of Hugo is the oldest agency in continous operation in the state of Oklahoma - the Goodland Academy was established in 1848 and continues to provide individualized residential education to disadvantaged and neglected youth.
''
As is, this article is a stub, at best.  Hugo has a vibrant history; let's get to work. Dirtydan667 14:45, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Text removed due to incorrect placement 

message: Deleted Eddie Rabbit. This person is the subject of a Wikipedia article that does not support the claim about his link to Hugo. Bruin2 (talk) 21:21, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable people
Talk:Telecommunications in Eritrea

message: Don't want to drive-by tag it so I thought I'd just leave a quick note here. -- œ™ 04:57, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Lead too short
Talk:Elektra (wrestling)

message: More than kayfabe, almost the entire article was copyvio taken word-for-word from the OWOW website, which is a surefire way to get the thing deleted. I've removed the copyvio. All text must be original -- and this article is also in need of citations as well. -23skidoo 16:59, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Revisions

message: Sorry but this article has so many issues that it's definitly not "B" class just yet. -MPJ-DK 15:46, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rating
Talk:Aaron Aguilera

message: "Stealing one of his "so called" old wrestling personalities, the Hardcore Kidd..."
Attack/bias anyone? TheGary (talk) 08:35, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stealing Gimmicks 
Talk:Brent Albright

message: I look at his time in WWE as the greatest time in his career so far. I just want to know what other peoples opinions about the greatest time in his career.
he was a real milenko in his time at the wwe. What about his time at the hair for men clinic?
Anyone know if he is related to gray albright? Should that be mentioned?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.241.214.74 (talk) 09:52, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  His time with WWE 

message: Aren't NWA championships listed under the promotion in which they were won and not "National Wrestling Alliance," (which is not itself a promotion)? Tromboneguy0186 (talk) 22:40, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  NWA world title 
Talk:Palm mute

message: Bassists sometimes use palm-muting, usually plucking with the thumb in order to get a sound more like a double-bass. The article should reflect this. Much of it is written as if it's only a guitar technique, so I'll have to change a number of things if I add anything. --Howdybob 06:57, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Palm-muting the electric bass 

message: To palm mute, placement of the hands has more to do with how the sound comes out more than how hard you hit it.  If the hand is near the bridge, it will be lighter, and near the pickup, heavier, one example where this is used is in "A new level" by pantera where guitarast Dimebag Darrell repeats the same riff, but alternates where he places his hand for a different sound.  Also, it should be added that the use of downstrokes for quavers (eight notes) and use of alernate picking (semiquavers, 16th notes) when playing at a fast tempo (generally 160 plus) is used to create a differnt sound, the 8th notes for a "chunk Chunk"percussive sound, and also the 16th notes for gallop riffs.  Examples include master of puppets, at a high tempo, with an 8th note rhythm, downpicked with the accents not palm muted so they will pop out.  Also for a gallop riff, we can see that hetfield uses down picking for the 8th notes and alternate picking to create a gallop riff in "Disposable Heroes", while also playing in 6/4, switching to 4/4 and throwing in an ocassional bar of 7/8.  There is more to palm muting than just pressing down hard, which will just break strings.  Also, if you wipe the sweat off your guitar after playing, and ocassionaly apply oil, and clean with naptha (lighter fluid) your bridge will stay clean, as it has on my 4 year old guitar.  Also, I have a floyd rose bridge and never have the problem of strings changing pitch from pressing down too hard as  I simply have a light touch, and also, most metal players don't press down on the bridge as this would make it nearly impossible to play fast as most metal players do.  In order for your wrist to move freely, you need a light touch.  Basically, guys, you need to add more to this article194.46.251.182 (talk) 01:05, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Palm muting, lets get a few things straight 

message: Why and where does this article need additional citations for verification? What references does it need and how should they be added? See: Help:Shortened footnotes (you might try the Teahouse if you have questions). Hyacinth (talk) 23:51, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional citations
Talk:Europass

message: === Use ===
* Who uses Europass outside the EU institutions? wiki-vr 11:35, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questions 

message: * Who uses Europass outside the EU institutions? wiki-vr 11:35, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use 
Talk:Everything and More (book)

message: I took the liberty of rewriting this article because the original seemed a little glib and offhanded, like it had been pulled from a Salon.com review.  It also failed to mention that the book was about Georg Cantor.  I still haven't added much in the way of info, and my prose could use a good edit, so if anyone wants to help, please do. Thanks. --Staple 08:59, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV Rewrite 

message: I'm a bit busy at the moment, but here's a link to the pdf of Rucker's critical review. The most substantial mathematical error he explicitly identifies is a passage in which Wallace mistakenly suggests that the Continuum Hypothesis is the hypothesis that the cardinality of the power set of aleph null is equal to the cardinality of the real numbers (c), when in fact it is the hypothesis that nothing comes between aleph-zero and c -- i.e. that aleph one = beth one. 
It seems pretty clear to me that this is probably a careless error that, while it could have been detected by a bit of peer review, is not of huge significance. Nonetheless, one can understand Rucker's assertion that Wallace's style makes such errors hard to take, and that he ought to have "projected self-deprecating humor." I see Wallace's style as growing precisely out of his own particular brand of self-deprecating humor, but I can see how it might not come across that way to everyone.  
A pdf of the article is here:
http://www.cs.sjsu.edu/faculty/rucker/wallace_review.pdf
A link to it is here:
http://www.rudyrucker.com/writing/
Solemnavalanche (talk) 05:48, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Critical Rucker Reveiw 

message: Everything and More does not seem to actually be an essay, but rather a full length 302 page book. Should we change the article title to reflect that? something more like 'Everything and More (book)' or 'Everything and More: A Compact History of Infinity'. --Mtgaffney56 14:34, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page Title
Talk:Australian Defence Force Academy

message: the section on history has alphabetic footnotes not it wiki format.
they should be converted, but they raise a suspicion that the text
was lifted from some (copyright) source. can someone pls investigate
and rectify? ta Coughinink 01:48, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Footnote format 

message: I recently temporarily deleted the article to remove certain revisions containing certain inappropriate content (OTRS people see this ticket for more information). Admins, please be careful not to restore these revisions. --bainer (talk) 03:39, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Temporary deletion 

message: An attempt at banter has been noted, in regards to the Structure sub section, where the second placed squadron (echo) has attempted to claim victory. The correct CDF Squadron for 2013 is Bravo Squadron : Reference 2012 Results for Lancaster Shield
:Is that published online anywhere? I've removed this as there's no way for outsiders to tell what is or isn't true at present and at least one of the versions (and potentially both versions) is wrong. Nick-D (talk) 08:23, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with the removal of this content altogether. There is unlikely to be a reference supporting the identity of the current CDF Squadron and even if there was it would soon become out-dated. Anyway is anyone really interested in the (minor) exploits of ADFA cadets (other than ADFA cadets themselves)? I doubt it. Anotherclown (talk) 14:13, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inappropriate Editing 