lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Galaxy Airlines Flight 203

message: While Project Aviation seems to have a general consensus not to include names of non-notable people other than flight crew on aviation accident/incident articles, there should obviously be an exception for circumstances like the sole survivor of this accident.  George Lamson Jr. is notable, but he is notable for being the sole survivor of this accident (he's even a subject of a documentary on sole survivors, Sole Survivor).
Per WP:BIO1E, 
So this article covers the event, and is also the appropriate article to discuss the person.  If you remove the references to the person here, then that would warrant creating a standalone article on him... which would conflict with WP:BIO1E. So, clearly there should be an exception to the "general consensus" where an individual has notability related to the aviation incident or accident, because it's recognition that the person is notable, the accident/incident page is just where the coverage of them and what makes them notable belongs.  As a reminder, Wikipedia articles are about general notability, not just notability to the aviation community itself. Shelbystripes (talk) 23:43, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: *Also -- I'm willing to acknowledge the article requires work and had inconsistencies, but I'm more than happy to put additional work into cleaning it up further.  Obviously I'm not going to do that if my edits are just going to be reverted though. Shelbystripes (talk) 02:38, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Identifying sole survivor 

message: Of the six refs provided by Shelbystripes...
*The first's material on Lamson reads, in its entirety: 
*The second is a film industry announcement whose text on Lamson reads, in its entirety: 
*The third is a review of Sole Survivor
*The fourth was written by Lamson himself. 
At that point I gave up. He's not even close to being notable, and even if he were, per WP:NOPAGE we'd cover him in this article. But he's not. He was miraculously thrown clear and survived. That's it. He did nothing. He was completely passive. His later journey of self-discovery is standard crime/disaster/human interest coverage and makes him no different from any number of sole survivors: my house burned down and my family was killed, but I survived; my dad crashed the car and my family was all killed, but I survived. The accident is notable and that someone survived should certainly be mentioned, but his name and subsequent life have nothing to do with the accident and tell the reader nothing. EEng 05:38, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Nonnotability

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :George Lamson Jr.. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 22#George Lamson Jr. until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 23:37, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "George Lamson Jr." listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Indian Airlines Flight 113

message: Per request on WT:AVIATION, here are some WP:RS sources for expansion/verification of the article.
; 
: Facts: 135 passengers and crew. Five (5) survivors. Worst domestic crash for the airline. 200,000 rupees to be paid to the family of each victim.
Will add more as I find them (others feel free to add your own.) Mûĸĸâĸûĸâĸû (blah?) 04:10, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: How can a plane have more landings than hours of flight? 190.173.214.36 (talk) 02:22, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  More landings than hours?
Talk:Filled milk

message: *I oppose to the proposed merger. As mentioned on Milnut, it is now known as milnot, and given it has 21k Ghits, it might be notable enough for its own article, as a more famous brand of filled milk.--Samuel di Curtisi di Salvadori 06:19, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger 
Talk:Loftleiðir Flight 001

message: Usually, the lessee (In this case, Garuda Indonesia) provides the flight numbers rather than the lessor (Icelandic Airlines). Is this not the case with this accident? Or should the article really be named "Garuda Indonesia flight 001"?111.69.108.222 (talk) 05:28, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Icelandic or Garuda
Talk:All Nippon Airways Flight 58

message: The article says that the fighter aircraft was piloted by a trainee pilot under the instruction of a Captain Kuma. Was the Captain not in the plane too? The infobox seems to indicate there was only a single person in the fighter plane. --Mûĸĸâĸûĸâĸû (blah?) 17:35, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I am under the impression that the instructor was in a separate plane.Boneyard90 (talk) 21:06, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crew count 

message: * http://www.city.sapporo.jp/kikikanri/aramasi/documents/koukuu04.pdf - http://www.webcitation.org/67IlDFnpT - mentions the crash
WhisperToMe (talk) 03:47, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: More
Talk:South African Airways Flight 201

message: In the article on the January crash the plane is called Yoke Uncle but this article references a plane called Yoke Peter. 86.173.98.24 (talk) 22:30, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: "Yoke-Uncle" (G-ALYU) was the BOAC-donated Comet used in the tank tests at the RAE.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.149.247.9 (talk) 19:52, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plane call signs 

message: I realize this has been here a while, but travelling 70 miles east from Naples, I end up over dry land, and 30 miles SE of Stromboli got me off Rosarno, neither of which is anywhere near the supposed crach site. You guys sure you got your headings straight? Regards, --G-41614 (talk) 08:35, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Search and recovery
Talk:McMillan (agency)

message: I am the manager of quality assurance at McMillan. 
The information on this page is out of date, and needs improvement (it looks like it's flagged as lacking notability).
I will be recommending edits to this page which will include improved copy, linking to sources and journalistic material, and adding images. 
If anyone is watching this page, I would appreciate any feedback, input, and assistance.
RyanDRafferty (talk) 15:07, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improvements needed. Information out of date.
Talk:KKLV

message: The FCC approved the transfer of the license to EMF on October 4th 2010, but the deal has not been reported as consummated as of today, and the license is still in the name of Wasatch Radio.   It's highly probable that the license transfer will be completed, but until the FCC is notified, it's not a completed transfer.69.37.98.206 (talk) 15:42, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Predicting future events
Talk:Buzz McNab

message: "He is married to a woman named Francine, and is taking dance lessons to prepare for the wedding;" -- I've never seen the show, but if he's married, why is he preparing for the wedding? Gmarsden (talk) 17:54, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  married?
Talk:Chiyo (Naruto)

message: Should this be placed in the list of jutsu? We're not placing Sasuke's lightning-composed sword, or similar abilities on their respective pages. I believe it should be removed until a new databook or upcoming chapter actually gives it a name. Sephiroth BCR 20:31, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Chiyo's resurrection jutsu has more of an impact on the series than Sasuke's lightning sword, much like Hidan's curse jutsu. Remove it if you really want to though. ~SnapperTo 21:17, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If that's the current policy, then I'm fine with it. I merely wished for verification. My thanks. Sephiroth BCR 22:30, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ressurection Technique
Talk:Claude S. Fischer

message: I created the biography of Claude S. Fischer on 01/10/2007. He is a professor at UC-Berkeley. Masterpiece2000 06:40, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This was the first article I created for Wikipedia. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 12:10, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  About the article 

message: How is this person  a notable academic? Cxbrx 05:56, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, he is. You can see his personal webpage. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 08:43, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Category talk:Royal children

message: Is this category necessary at all? I'm thinking it is not and is an example of over categorization. Why not categorize everyone on Wikipedia under the age of 18 as children then. Also, the age of majority is not universal and a child to some is not a child to others. Charles 06:40, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Current royal children under the age of 16 (which is considered the age of majority for most monarchies) Morhange (talk) 23:48, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Necessary?

message: I believe the age should be raised from 16 to 18, as 18 is traditionally the age considered a person becomes an adult, not 16. CDRL102 (talk) 20:04, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  Hi CDRL102, I think 16 and under is fine to describe royal children, I mean if it's changed to 18, then it kinda makes this category irrelevant, since its specifically for the children, 18 is for adults and these children are not adults yet. Hope my answer made sense (Monkelese (talk) 22:35, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  What I'm saying people under the age of 18 - ie until the day before their 18th birthday, while they are 17 - should be considered children, once they are 18, they are adults. CDRL102 (talk) 22:42, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: So if some of them in the category have reached 18, then these category should be moved from their article. (Monkelese (talk) 22:55, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes as they have reached 18, the age range would be 0-17. CDRL102 (talk) 00:40, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The system we have is okay. Because we cannot compensate for cultural differences. An example in Japan is that the age of majority is 20 for most people there are some exceptions. Despite a new law that has been created to allow for responsibilities to extend to 18 year olds, the imperial house still sees 20 as the age of majority (Princess Kako became a working member on her 20th birthday). To be fair the law was only enacted this year.--Hipposcrashed (talk) 14:46, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age
Talk:Debra Cagan

message: I'll assume the HIV positive category was a baseless and quite henious addition to make. If I'm wrong, please source it. And a note to other potential wasters posting nonsense here: Why? The true facts are far more damaging to the image of the United States government than are your stupid remarks, which leave her looking smarter than you. HaudCivitas 21:37, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: HIV claim

message: If you read the article at footnote 2 you will see that the "iron cross" is in fact the "Commander's Cross Order of Merit" awarded by the Hungarians to her at that event.  That probably should be noted in the body of the article.  A Brooks.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.8.246.79 (talk) 05:56, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Iron Cross

message: I almost tagged this a  - allthough it is not as clear as most attackpages, it's very much written as an attack. However, the attack is sourced. It' vastly POV though.Greswik 06:45, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: POV

message: Although I support this, or a category like it, existing I don't think her statements on Iran make it clear she fits. It needs to be clear she encourages fear or hatred or discrimination against Muslims, or studies the issue, to make her relevant.--T. Anthony 03:32, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you very much for discussing this matter, instead of only reverting. I see your point that there is no direct source stating her as being Islamophobic. Her claimed statements are clearly "anti-Iranian" in nature, i.e she "hates all Iranians", which could be interpreted literally as anyone ethnically Iranian, as beyond the nation-state of Iran, but not clearly Islamophobic. Atari400 05:15, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think a category on Islamophobia is as valid as say :Category:Anti-Buddhism. Although I think adding it to an article should be done with some caution especially in the case of living people. I've actually added the Islamophobia category to some articles. Anyway thanks.--T. Anthony 08:08, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Islamophobia category

message: Can somebody please explain to me what Cagan's alleged quote about Iran has to do with a photograph of her receiving an award from the Hungarian Ambassador to the United States? As written this paragraph makes no sense. GabrielF (talk) 03:02, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does Iran have to do with Hungary?
Talk:Malcolm Kennedy

message: * - Sexy Scenes cut out
* - TV Pick of the dayRAIN*the*ONE BAM 20:00, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Transnational marriage

message: Not sure "intermarriage" is a synonym here. Removing, but happy to include with a source  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Karen-bmi30 (talk • contribs) 05:04, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

message: Hello,
This if my first time doing a topic on Wikipedia, so I hope I am doing it correctly. Joysongqc 06:48, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is it possible for an indian to immigrate to pakistan because of spouse pakistani?? 2A02:9B0:4029:B92C:E17F:E044:BF4D:75F3 (talk) 21:19, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Immigration
Talk:Stan Chambers

message: Why is there no DOB?
  " Born: August 11, 1923 in Los Angeles, California, USA "   https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0150445/   BrianAlex (talk) 02:09, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Age?
Talk:Indian Airlines Flight 605

message: Year in which achievement is made is referred with the preposition "on" instead of "in"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Solo-man (talk • contribs) 10:39, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammatical Errors 

message: The article states that one of the pilots had a "flying experience of 10,340 hours of which 7,176 hours were on the Airbus A320."
A320 was launched commercially in 1988. How could anyone have over 7,000 hours of flying experience with it in 1990? This would mean flying an A320 about 10 hours each day continuously for two years. It does not seem real.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.20.227.158 (talk) 21:18, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flying experience with the A320
Talk:Scandinavian Airlines System Flight 751

message: The National Geographic Channel programme "Air crash investigation" says that plane type is an DC9 !? and that it's easy to identify by the jet motors located behind the wings. Electron9 (talk) 05:09, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  NGC says it's an DC9 not MD81 as in the article 

message: "This effectively destroyed the engines, until eventually, they failed completely" This sentence makes absolutely no sense. If the engines were destroyed they cannot subsequently fail. It is sufficient to say they were destroyed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.148.34.45 (talk) 17:14, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Redundancy

message: In the accident summary it says there was 100 injuries but in the main text it says there was 25. Which is the correct number?Omega13a (talk) 05:35, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconstancy 

message: This accident parallels the two crashes of the Boeing 737MAX in the sense that engineers that are not pilots, decide to implement a certain system to "correct" pilot actions, while the pilot is left without control.  The MCAS system kept battling the pilots, and in the SAS accident it was the device that PREVENTED the pilots to reduce the throttles, thus prolonging the compressor surging and causing engines to fail. In both cases, the devices details were not given to the crews, which had no idea what was happening. Therefore, I would suggest someone with more experience to add the two B737MAX crashes in the similar accidents chapter, as in all three cases, the aircraft designers participated in the accidents by designing and installing systems that work against the human pilots.
:Thanks unsigned but the see also is for related articles and the MAX accidents have no connection. MilborneOne (talk) 20:56, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another accident caused by devices installed to prevent pilot actions, that work AGAINST the better pilot judgment?
Talk:TWA Flight 843

message: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1D7x3GoCqZkTWA 843 KTVU Fox News July 30, 1992
Local KTVU News interviews with survivors may conflict with NTSB and support pilots.  Stunned passengers noticed an orange glow before they saw first flames. Note: orange glow may not be the same as the flicker of fire and flame.
One eye witness, Tim Joyce, said the airplane dropped onto its right side, big huge orange flame, lot of smoke, it continued down runway on fire a bit, it came to a stop, the nose collapsed, tail on fire, the doors opened, chutes opened, they evacuated quickly.   Several saw glow of flames.   
One female passenger:  we landed, thought it was over, then saw flames.  Another female passenger:  it wouldnt stop bouncing.  Madeleine Austin, passenger: the plane was on fire while we were in the air, I saw reflections of the fire in the movie screen.  
KTVU consensus description:  plane lifts off for a moment like a 'hop', orange glow of flames in engine, pilots hard land, tires blow, plane veers left and burst into flames.  Madeleine Austin, passenger:  the landing took an eternity when you know your plane is on fire.  
This overtly conflicts with official NTSB report that claim a normal safe takeoff could have occurred.  NTSB blamed faulty sensors and pilots for flawed takeoff abort routine, and according to wikipedia (which may need a big edit) made no reference to any 'engine fire' witnesses/passenger claim they saw as causal.﻿  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.68.141.83 (talk) 20:33, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Passenger & Eyewitness Testimony 

message: Is the previous incident section worth including considering it happened 17 years before and did not result in damage to the aircraft? MKFI (talk) 13:12, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: No, none of the sources suggest any relevance to TWA843. This isn't another JAL123. 86.12.184.49 (talk) 10:24, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed it. 80.3.183.104 (talk) 19:59, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Previous incident relevant?
Talk:Mallard Creek High School

message: where is it stated that maroon is one of the school's colors?  I was under the impression the color's proper name was "cardinal red."  69.132.44.97 (talk) 02:37, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  maroon a school color?
Talk:FAU Stadium

message: notable game: germany against ecuador, friendly match. --Dirk | <°°> 18:58, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  notable games 
Talk:Eastern Air Lines Flight 980

message: The investigators' team had to (and did!) actually climb the mountain to try and investigate this crash. I believe it's heroic enough to mention it in the article. BadaBoom (talk) 17:50, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Worth noting? 

message: The sidebar says there were 10 crew and 19 passengers, the article says there were 8 crew and 21 passengers.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.0.174.133 (talk) 17:53, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: As per the first source, the accurate information of 19 passengers and 10 crew has been updated. --Cubs197 12:49, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistent 

message: Should we add this list to the see also?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 0w0 catt0s (talk • contribs) 21:37, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Good idea 0w0 catt0s.  Alsee (talk) 22:00, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  See also
Talk:Motoko Minagawa

message: I was just wachting the anime and relized that Motoko had to have been held back a year or she chose to stay back one year because in episode 22 (the one were the Prince Yuki Fan Club is trying to get answers on wether or not there are any girls on the student counsel) and when talking to President Takai (I know I'm spelling his name wrong so I'm sorry I can't find the spelling). It says that she is a year older than Yuki and she is graduating that year, but in the manga she doesn't graduate, But Takai does (I think. I don’t remember him sense Yuki became student counsel president). I'm not sure that this happened in the manga (I can't get a hold of most of my manga right now so I can't check), but in the manga it does at least make you think she is a year if not more older.  So should it be in the article that she was held back???Smileyface 12 91 10:39, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure. I read about her getting held back on purpose in a fanfic once, but that's probably not anything to go by. Check the manga, I guess. Raven23 20:02, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Problem is almost all of my fruits basket (I have all that are out but only have sence about 14 with me) so I can't check.Smileyface 12 91 07:49, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Held Back A Year
Talk:Church Street Graveyard

message: I've got a picture of Joe Cain's marker that I took a few years back.  Do you think it is worth adding, or would that be going a bit far? --Donovan Ravenhull (talk) 07:49, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think a pic of Joe Cain's grave would be awesome, the sun was all wrong when I took mine of Church Street and I couldn't get a good shot.  Altairisfar (talk) 17:22, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add pic of Joe Cain's marker? 

message: Hello, there is an article on Church Street Graveyard here, http://www.encyclopediaofalabama.org/face/Article.jsp?id=h-1039. There is a great photo of Joe Cains grave (if I do say so myself). You might find some of this information useful, and possibly add an external link? 
Thanks, 
Justin --Duboiju (talk) 16:27, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: External Link?
Talk:SPAD S.A

message: I have found almost nothing on the subject. Just comments that it was not very loved. Any other info to complete that section would be welcome.
Gaetan Marie 07:44, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Operational history 

message: Picture of a model of this curious aircraft, found on www.flugzeugforum.de. That observer pit looks very unsafe. Drutt 07:23, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: The type had a single propeller, so it can't be described as a "push-pull" type - in fact it was a tractor aeroplane with a nacelle (called the "pulpit") in front of the propeller. Soundofmusicals (talk) 06:37, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I wonder if the pilot had an "eject observer" button in the cockpit, to be pressed when quick escape was necessary. Drutt (talk) 19:17, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

text: D**n! How did I let that slip through? Thanks for correcting it, sounofmusicals!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gaetanmarie (talk • contribs) 12:48, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: NOT a push/pull!!!

message: The article says:
>>>On November 25, 1916, Russian pilot Karpov and his observer Bratolyubovym shot down a German aircraft...
Has anybody access to the sources of this information in Russian?
This piece looks like author's misreading of Russian text, as ending "-ym" (cyrillic "-ым") in Russian means "action was done by that person". 
So his surname should be written here as Bratolyubov (Братолюбов), as this is in common with Russian surnames, and surname Bratolyubovym (Братолюбовым) thought also possible, is highly unlikely.
In this case the English phrase should be:
...Russian pilot Karpov and his observer Bratolyubov...
and its equivalent in Russian is:
...русским пилотом Карповым и его наблюдателем Братолюбовым...
:This looks very likely - I have actually changed the text to conform with your comments - although I am sure the original correctly transcribed the (English) source. Thanks for that! Next time you find something like this - feel free to correct it yourself - although do add a comment like this so we know what you're about! And welcome to Wikipedia!! --Soundofmusicals (talk) 08:02, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some comments about Russian names spelling in "Operational history" section of the article.