Template talk:Jews and Judaism sidebar

message: Land of Israel was added by me.--HIZKIAH (User • Talk) 15:52, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Land of Israel]]

message: How is renewal judaism a den.? Isn't it just another hasidic den.? And shouldn't Dor Daim be included? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 203.206.248.147 (talk) 13:16, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renewal? 

message: I propose adding a link to the criticism page. Back in December, the Mormonism, Buddhism, and Islam templates all had links to their specific criticism page, however Islam removed their citing this template as precedent. Ironically, someone wanted to include the Criticism of Christianity link on the Christianity template, and cited those as precedent. If this is going to be a matter of "Well the Jews don't have the link, so why should we" or "The Mormons have the link, so should the Muslims" etc, we should decided as a whole whether links to these criticism pages are appropriate for the parent religion templates. I believe that all religion templates should have a link to the parent criticism page (if one exists), and that is what I am proposing here. What do we think?-Andrew c 00:15, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I won't have a problem. Criticism and kvetching is our favorite activity anyway. ←Humus sapiens ну? 00:53, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your comment. A centralized discussion on this general topic can be found at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Criticism link on religion navigational boxes. -Andrew c 03:07, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The discussion was in favor of adding criticism links to appropriate infoboxes across the board. However, I do not know the best placement for this link. I was thinking somewhere under the Judaism/core principals header would be best, but if someone else wants to try and place it, please be my guest.-Andrew c 02:51, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Criticism of Judaism already has been added to  and I think it is indeed appropriate there, because that TL is dedicated to religious topics. I am not sure whether the Criticism link really belongs here, because this particular TL is more about history rather than strictly religion. At least, I can think of a few links more relevant to Jews and Jewish history than religious Criticism of Judaism. ←Humus sapiens ну? 04:09, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism link 

message: Two unrelated topics:
# There is no reason to duplicate the same link. I propose either to replace the 2nd instance with Final Solution or remove it. 
# Do the lost ten tribes belong in the template next to Ashkenazi · Sephardi · Mizrahi? In any case, if we include the lost ancient tribes, then maybe Israelites deserve to be included? ←Humus sapiens ну? 01:08, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  1) Duplicate link to [[the Holocaust]] and 2) Is [[Ten Lost Tribes]] an ethnic division? 

message: Since Jewish political movements are very recent historical phenomenon, and Jewish history and persecution are very old, I'm moving Jewish political movements to the end. Yehoishophot Oliver 15:11, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  change of order 

message: Do we really need all those languages? They certainly seem less relevant than the other sections.
I think the bottom two lines of the languages section could easily come off. Is there anyone who objects to this? --Eliyak T·C 21:09, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm going to go ahead and remove those lines. --Eliyak T·C 17:44, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Languages 

message: Does anyone else see it? And why on Earth does it show up? It's so annoying. Lockesdonkey (talk) 04:16, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's with the massive whitespace on the right side of the template? 

message: Is the mention of China necessary in the 'Population (Historical)' section? It isn't historically an established religion just as it is in say India or Iran etc. It’s just not something that’s been relatively recent, and the alleged 'history' is still rather dubious according to many sources, I think it should be removed from the list. Smarred Wolet (talk) 20:55, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: China

message: Check out the template here, why are the images scaled non-uniformly?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fixman (talk • contribs) 16:36, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Little problem 

message: Is it really neccessary for a menorah to be used in the template. For one, Hanukkah is a very unimportant holiday in Judaism, and most would not celebrate it if not for its proximity to Christmas. Secondly, A picture of a Torah would do the job much better.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.194.203.128 (talk) 03:00, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a picture of a seven-branched menorah, an ancient symbol of Judaism, not a nine-branched hanukiah (Hanukkah menorah). — Malik Shabazz  03:29, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Menorah? 

message: Ehm, the Tanya should not be on this list. Nor should the Tur or Zohar IMO but that is up to discussion. 93.172.54.207 (talk) 18:09, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Could you explain why you feel that way? — Malik Shabazz  18:30, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Texts need to be edited. 

message: This page is 71 kilobytes long. Some discussion dated back to three years ago. Obviously older discussion should be archived like Template talk:Jew/Archive01. Will anyone do so? --Quest for Truth (talk) 03:51, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. — Malik Shabazz  04:01, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archive 

message: They did not include The Jewish denomination of The Karaites
70.233.168.71 (talk) 14:41, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please be more specific about what needs to be changed. 930913(Congratulate) 23:38, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request from 70.233.168.71, 21 July 2010 

message: 78.151.157.68 (talk) 13:08, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request from 78.151.157.68, 23 August 2010 

message: Green Zionists (Green Zionism) should be listed among the types of Zionists/Zionism. 
74.108.111.8 (talk) 09:57, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Done -Atmoz (talk) 14:11, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

text: Removed, per WP:UNDUE. Template space is at a premium. Jayjg (talk) 23:51, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request from 74.108.111.8, 17 November 2010 

message: Could someobdy add Samaritan to the list of denominations please? thanks 84.13.28.220 (talk) 09:26, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Samaritans are not Jews.GreyShark (dibra) 12:45, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Samaritan

message: Please add Messianic as one of the denominations of Jews.  Messianic Jews are one of the largest growing denominations of Jews in Israel and the world.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.253.170.115 (talk) 14:42, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Please read Wikipedia's article about Messianic Judaism. It isn't considered Judaism by any of the major Jewish religious movements, which means it has no place in a template about Judaism. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 04:56, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

text: Messianic Jews might be considered a related group to Jews, but it has a very fluent ethnic definition merging into multiple nationals adopting it, rather that ethnic Jews, practicing Christianity.Greyshark09 (talk) 18:06, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Messianic Judaism

message: "Ethnicities" renamed into "communities", since Jews are an ethno-religious community with single Jewish ethnicity and sub-groups within. Related ethno-religious groups (Khazars, Samaritans, Lembas) were separated from ethnically Jewish (Ashkenazi, Sephardi, Mizrahi, Yemenite) communities in the bar.Greyshark09 (talk) 18:13, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jewish "ethnicities" 

message: I propose deletion of the leadership section. There are only about 25 people listed, any any listing is bound to be very incomplete and extremely subjective. ypnypn (talk) 16:52, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Leadership

message: The wiki page on skeksis ( movie character) there is large sections about jews. It seems to be placed there on accident 75.134.99.19 (talk) 17:40, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: .  I can't find anything here that refers to what you're talking about.  What do you mean? –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 19:14, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 12 November 2019 

message: Hi, I was wondering if in the Population section we could instead have North America and South America rather than North America and Latin America and the Caribbean. There are countries in Latin America that also belong to North America so it makes no sense to have one section be geographic (North America) and the other geo-linguistic (Latin America). It's too arbitrary. Mexico, for example, belongs to both North America and Latin America. All the other regions are entirely geographic (Europe, Asia, Africa, Oceania, etc) but for some reason only Latin America is geo-linguistic. DemianStratford (talk) 05:57, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: — Guarapiranga ☎ 07:18, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population topic 

message: Typo on 'Democrstic Republic of the Congo' in the sidebar: Democrstic --> Democratic. 195.224.192.68 (talk) 13:48, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: M.Bitton (talk) 13:52, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 5 July 2023