lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Principal photography

message: I think there are essential things missing, such like scenes being not shot in the order as they appear in the film and the clapperboard and ... and ... and .... The article is quite short. As I'm neither a film expert nor English I don't want to edit the article, but it would be nice if someone could... ;-)
84.163.87.46 17:07, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Principal photography as defined here is different from my understanding of the term.  In the article as it stands, it defines it as being essentially all photography, excluding pre-production and post-production.  My understanding is that the term normally refers to filming by the Principal Unit (aka First Unit) as opposed to the Second Unit.  This will normally include all of the filming of the Principal Cast.  This definition is supported by the first reference that I checked (Career perspectives in electronic media by Peter B. Orlik), here: http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=0OPtGlqpzO8C&pg=PA76&lpg=PA76&dq=principal-photography+principal-cast&source=bl&ots=Majp3_ER70&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=10&ved=0CGQQ6AEwCTgU#v=onepage&q=principal-photography%20principal-cast&f=false.  Would anyone else care to comment on this? 86.7.30.217 (talk) 08:07, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Principal Photography as distinct from Second Unit 

message: There is a run on sentence in the last paragraph that is confusing. There must be a way to convey the information in more organized shorter sentences.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rusty5231B (talk • contribs) 01:37, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fix the run on sentence in the last paragraph
Template talk:Gdańsk

message: I'd recommend removing the :Category:Gdańsk from this template, instead, all relevant articles should manually receive a more specific subcategory, like :Category:Boroughs of Gdańsk or :Category:Tourism in Poland + Category:Gdańsk (or you can create a :Category:Tourist atractions in Gdańsk, perhaps.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 17:07, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category
Talk:Asturias, patria querida

message: Castilian version of the hymn, as it's sung in Asturies, and as it's recognised legally, says "tengo DE subir al árbol" and "tengo DE coger la flor". This construction is a code-switching between Castilian and Asturian, but that's the official form of the lyrics. I think that should be the form in which the hymn would appear in Wikipedia, because the other is a modern form, made by the influence of Castilian language and rarely heard in Asturies (although is more usual today than in the past).
:¿Teño?, ¿xubir?, ¿árbore?. The first is clearly galician not asturian, or at least asturian from Eo-Navia, nevertheless is not part of the traditional song. Xubir and árbore may sound very asturian but they're not either the traditional words of the anthem, so I change them to the correct way. 81.9.220.142 11:27, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Why arnt the Spanish lyrics of the anthem on here? Spongie555 (talk) 21:35, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Spanish
Talk:Nicholai Ginovaef

message: Ginovaef is 190cm as stated in Resident Evil Complete walkthrough.
:Which walkthrough? DON"T BE VAGUE WITH YOUR SOURCES. There are millions of them! If it's not an official Capcom-approved guide, then your source is irrevelant. Either way, the height I put is the one from the RE/Bio Archives, which makes it more correct than yours either way. Jonny2x4 02:31, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I heared that Biohazard Archives were not created by Capcom personel meaning that it's not entirely true... or was it some other book?OsirisV 14:25, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

message: maybe the English version was intentionaly altering it? I mean... Nicholai Ginovaef and Umbrella R&A don't exacly look similar at all. Perhaps they altered who wrote it... maybe so it would tie up better with the main series or something...it could happen...92.8.56.129 (talk) 12:11, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Translation Error
Talk:Animal House

message: From this soundtrack, being sung by the cast?
How ? 2601:18F:E83:1670:1EA6:4215:B02A:EAD2 (talk) 11:46, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: How would you suggest that it be added to the page? Eric Nashbar (talk) 15:32, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  How is it not mentioned that Louie Louie became a hit single
Talk:Logical graph

message: JA: I could not find the Praeclarum Theorema of Leibniz among the numbered consequences in Spencer Brown's Laws of Form.  Could whoever added this remark supply a page number?  Thanks, Jon Awbrey 03:22, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Praeclarum Theorema ???

message: Are there any pictures of these graph's  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.228.200.114 (talk) 11:57, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: You might try searching on Google or Yahoo!.  Random Surfer (talk) 01:44, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Pictures?
Talk:Garneau User Group

message: be careful not about starting articles on the people in this group.  Policy for Biographies can be found at WP:BIO.  It is my understanding that most (unnotable people are usually deleted... I've even seen a case of a high school football student in the states Mathew Stafford, who is recruited for college is seems notable but was not included.  So, this is just a friendly reminder that way you may concentrat on other things for wiki.  --CyclePat 17:54, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: k. thanks alot CyclePat paat 19:28, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  its le local 255 usually. Presently its during the lunch time. When I was writing GuG, i wasnt sure if it was nessessary to put in the class room number and when. paat 19:03, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The day school was out for Chrsitmas break, the editing team ( were were three accually, me, my friend and a 11th grader - oh and Mr. Legros). We just finished the GuGabits no. 12. He's at Las Vegas now, trying to get more products for us. But he said that it was gonna be the best GuGabits ever. And he relly liked the cover page - I did the cover page! so i cant wait for him to send us the pdf file of it... Cant wait ... ah well. So all this to say that when i get it, i will put it with the other GuGabits. paat 19:13, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  alright, so i guess i wont continue puttin the gugabits onto that page. BTW, should i put a  list of our sponsers? paat 19:15, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: We're doing good. People just want to know what these awards are and who gave them to us/Garneau.  If you have sources, that's the best way.  I think if you put a section that says sources that should be good enought.  --CyclePat 00:51, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Do you mean as in a subsection ("===n===") or a type of reference page? Even i dont understand what I'saying lol paat 19:15, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  GuG - ''le group qui met toute les évaluations ensemble pour fair un GuGabits'' ...comitee thing i forget 

message: I dont know how to work on the reference for this page, as in how to prove where is my reference, but everything i took came from www.escgarneau.com paat 19:27, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: J'ai ajouté les réferences necessaires.  Il sagisait de faire en sorte que l'information soit accessible plus facillement.  (http://www.escgarneau.com/gug/apropos.shtml)  --CyclePat 01:01, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  K. Merci beacoup. maintenant je comprends. merci paat 01:37, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference 

message: I merged it into this article, under its own section. -- Megamix? 04:30, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks Megamix paat 03:15, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  GuGabits
Talk:The Tufts Daily

message: i cleaned up the 'sections' part of the article, and changed some of the content under 'editorials.' don't want to step on anyone's toes, but i wanted the article to read more clearly.--212.240.35.234 14:54, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: comment

message: Instead of engaging in edit conflicts, and before opening a WP:RFC here, I would like to hear from fellow editors (preferably those with  an account and more than 10 edits...) whether the content at The Tufts Daily#Staff section, which is a list of non-encyclopedic non-notable names of students who held positions at this university newspaper, is important enough to remain on Wikipedia. Shalom11111 (talk) 20:56, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Gone.  No place for that in an encyclopedia - the pub website is that way-> . Toddst1 (talk) 05:05, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: +1. Shalom11111 (talk) 22:18, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of a meaningless directory from the article
Talk:Avast

message: Hi Wikipedia community, 
Sept. 16, 2021, the Avast company has undergone a key transformation and has rebranded as well as released a new product. Being a part of the Avast Integrated Marketing team, I wanted to share the materials needed for the wikipedia community to update the Avast page as I understand Wikipedia strongly discourages companies from handling this directly.   
You can find the link to the Avast Logo here. 
You can find the new Avast One product guide here. 
If additional information is required, here you'll find the Avast fact sheet.
 
The rigorous detail with which you approach your work is much appreciated,  
Mantas Ciuksys (talk) 10:45, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Avast New Logo and Product Release 

message: Hello, wiki community, 
Recommending a change of the Avast logo to a positive logo lockup intended for light backgrounds. Detailed description on logo use available here. 
Including a link to the logo as well.
Thank you for your consideration. 
Mantas Ciuksys (talk) 16:46, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Avast Logo Update According to Brand Guidelines 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Elli (talk | contribs) 21:12, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Avast →  – Company name is "Avast Software". Eurohunter (talk) 00:41, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 7 February 2022
Talk:Severn School

message: I'm going to remove the tag from this page if nobody can explain why it's there.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tqbf (talk • contribs) 01:28, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP:NOT ? 

message: I did what I thought was needed, but it didn't seem to work.  Coordinate are correct.  Trying to get this working so google maps will link the article to it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.179.163.39 (talk) 07:48, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anyone know how to get the Location working? 

message: The article states that Severn School lost more men per capita than any other school in the country.  I actually attended this school for high school, and I've never heard this statistic ever.  There's no citation for the statement either.  Does anyone have a problem with removing this from the page?  --TravisBernard (talk) 22:42, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  World War II Stat
Talk:Sage Hall

message: This article from Cornell's news service provides an interesting Sage College story: http://www.news.cornell.edu/releases/March97/sagecornerstone.jg.html. btm 22:56, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, the letter is linked to in the external links, but it may still be of enough interest to incorporate it into the body of the article. btm 06:56, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cornerstone

message: This edit ported in text verbatim from this version of Cornell University. (The edit also changed the name of the relevant section- a separate change.) —Bill Price (nyb) 01:15, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy/paste notification 

message: Besides the subject of this article there are other notable Sage Halls on U.S. campuses. I'm thinking of Sage Hall at Tuskegee University and Russell Sage Hall at Russell Sage College, Troy, New York. — ℜob C. alias ÀLAROB 20:31, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation needed
Talk:Schweizer S300

message: The article is a little confusing.  it's about the S-300, but discusses the Hughes 269 a fair bit.  Can someone help with this?  Wikipeterproject (talk) 17:54, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hughes 269 
Talk:GuGabits

message: I dont think this article should be merged with École Secondaire Catholique Garneau
i dont know why. its just sumthing to be taken seperately paat 18:26, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There might not be enough material to merit a complete article on its own. Besides, it's more convenient for users to get the information they want in one fully fleshed-out article, rather than half a dozen minor ones, but that's just me. I've cleaned it up for now. -- Megamix? 18:57, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Alright. I guess your right. But do you think it is a good idea that I put a picture of one of the cover pages of the GuGabits? Im in the editing group, and we just finished the 12th edition, and everyone says that the cover is the best one ever. Do you think it could be appropriate to put in a thumb of the pic? paat 21:51, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, that would be great. You can upload images at Special:Upload, I think. For the licensing tag select Fair use - magazine. -- Megamix? 06:33, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok. Tomorrow I got back to school, so I'll ask my teacher for a copy of the cover. He was supposed to send it to us via email during the holidays, but i guess he hasnt yet. Gimme a few days. As for the mergin of GuG and GuGabits, I dont mind merging them together, if you want to do it fine, but If you don't Ill do it. paat 19:10, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Political interpretations of The Wonderful Wizard of Oz

message: Is the subject of this article the theories of what Frank Baum meant when he wrote 'The Wizard of Oz'? It seems to me that's what's meant by 'Political interpretations of The Wonderful Wizard of Oz'. I DON'T think that the 'Alternative Allegory' section fits with the intent of the article or with the meaning of the word 'allegory' as it's used in this article. I advocate for removing this section.Niccast (talk) 03:51, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Alternative Allegory' section 

message: I removed a small sentence that made a metaphor of the Wizard to the USA political position President Elect. It's very clearly not a political interpretation of the story of the Wizard of Oz. It is simply a metaphor about something else, using a very small characteristic of a single character in the story. It's clear to me there is no reason the sentence should be included in the article. I would cite wp:undue and the fact that it's just simply not on topic. This is the sentence:
It seems the writer may have discussed a political interpretation of the story (see the second source, but paywalled), but that is not mentioned in the small excerpt above. So I removed it, among other edits. IP 2600:4041:5248:4000:1064:7C55:A8AE:BD44 reverted it, arguing in the edit summary that it was sourced content. So I have removed it again and posted here on talk . Sourced or not, it still isn't about the article topic. I can't actually determine whether that second source discusses politics at all, but it doesn't look likely. Atwood seems to be a mostly fiction writer and that paper is a study of her literary works with relation to the Wizard of Oz. HC (talk) 22:35, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The topic of the wiki article is the interpretation of political themes within The Wonderful Wizard of Oz, rather than the interpretation of miscellaneous political topics using The Wonderful Wizard of Oz as a figure of speech. Atwood does not explore the political meanings of L. Frank Baum's work, but instead uses The Wonderful Wizard of Oz in her own writings. In Gibert's Margaret Atwood’s Visions and Revisions of "The Wizard of Oz" it is said that Atwood "has often been inspired by both [the novel and the film] and has drawn attention to the main issues it raises", with several examples of non-political themes ("e.g. the transformative power of words, gendered power relationships, the connection between illusion and reality, the perception of the artist as a magician, and different notions of home"). In her The Guardian article, Atwood does not explain The Wonderful Wizard of Oz with the help of politics, but rather explains politics with the help of The Wonderful Wizard of Oz. As such, it does not fit the scope of this wiki article. Cilidus (talk) 23:51, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Items not on topic should be removed
Category talk:Fan games

message: What are they doing here? Shouldn't they be in the ROM Hacks subcategory instead? They aren't really remakes/sequels at all, just cheap modifications of roms. CheapAlert 18:47, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  ROM Hacks? 

message: "User talk:NorCalHistory/Archive1/archive C-evo"...do I even realy need to say more? Why is that article contained in a User talk?72.204.83.132 03:23, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Say What?
Talk:Saltaire railway station

message: I would have put in more history, but I haven't been able to discover yet when the original station was built. The line was opened in 1847, but Saltaire did not exist until the 1850's (Salt's Mill opened in 1853). --ColinFine 18:49, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: History

message: The relevant text currently reads "West Yorkshire Metro have announced plans to improve the station, providing a ticket office and heated waiting rooms. The announcement is dated for release on the 1st of June 2004 and it is unknown if the plan is still current."
On 15 Mar 2006, User:84.70.107.245 added the comment: "Yes it is but may take ages to implement", without any references. Subsequently User:84.70.191.143 replaced this, as well as the link to the plan and the factual information about its date, with "It could be a long time before this is implemented." While I accept that the 'it is unknown ... ' formula is barely encyclopaedic, it seems to me that this is even less so, and furthermore the reference has been removed.
I cannot see how this is an improvement, so I have reverted it. ColinFine 16:13, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Metro Proposal
Talk:Grand Meadow Township, Mower County, Minnesota

message: *I'd like to specifically note that the etymology of the town's name is taken from the reference cited.--Hraefen 18:51, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Han twins murder plot

message: So, did Jeen get 25 years OR did she get life in prison? There can be only one maximum. Could someone who knows about it please clear it up. Thank you.
Philippics 18:52, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is most certainly 26 years (min) to life (max). Several original sources have corroborated this and the sentence has never been reduced or modified in any way (through appeals or any other process e.g. new findings, etc.)  Bsharkey (talk) 05:17, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Ambiguous

message: Would anyone out there know how i can contact Jeen Han,where she is serving her sentance.  Ken canada 01:48, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is public knowledge and has since been added in the article. Bsharkey (talk) 05:19, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location(s) of Sentence 

message: An episode of American Justice just aired and said parole would be eligible at the earliest in 2000. Can anyone cite the 2016? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.233.78.201 (talk) 05:53, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The article you're referencing no longer exists (deleted as "unreferenced negative bio per WP:BLP"), however I am attempting to corroborate this information to ensure it is factually correct here and can be maintained correctly going forward.  The earliest possible date as reported in various sources is/was 2020.  There is no evidence to date that this has ever been moved up.  I do not know where the rumored 2016 date came about.  Now this article reads, there is a "hard release date of 2018" which appears even more suspicious, being that the sentence would have to have been shortened from by two years, and has by all indications never happened.  Something tells me both of these additional dates is/are original research and auspicious at best, perhaps even wishful thinking. The description "hard release date" certainly comes off as unsubstantiated.  A parole board would have to approve any such release, so there could never be a hard release date, definitely not 8+ years in advance.  Bsharkey (talk) 05:45, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parole Date / Contradictions 

message: How is this a conspiracy ("an agreement between two or more persons to commit a crime")? Who is the "evil" twin's co-conspirator? -- Finlay McWalterᚠTalk 20:05, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  A conspiracy of one? 

message: Really an incomplete article as of right now. What happened? This article is only about news and feature coverage of this case, but it says almost nothing about what was actually going on. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 18:25, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  What happened?