Talk:Beauty and the Beast (1946 film)

message: This article was automatically  assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 02:30, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating

message: I simply want to note that this is a remarkably brief entry for a film which I understand to be universally considered as being among the greatest films ever made.
Specifically, there is almost no material about the film's production, about its technique, about its reception, or about its legacy. Considering the film's stature, this entry could easily be several times as long - i.e., as long as some entries on Wikipedia for "Halloween" films and the like.
I admit I am "leech" complaining, but I am sure some would wish to contribute towards this, I thought I should point it out.
69.230.80.198 (talk) 01:16, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello anon! I've been meaning to boost this article up. Older films articles do not get as much attention as newer films do on Wikipedia, but I've tried to remedy this a bit as I've boosted up articles about Rififi, Eyes Without a Face and Vampyr. I'll get along to this one eventually too, but hey, free free to start without me! Andrzejbanas (talk) 18:04, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion of article 

message: Wouldn't it be better to mention how before Belle's father left he asked each of his daughters what gift they would like for him to buy them and what each daughter asked for? After all, if Belle had not asked for the rose he would not have picked it and triggered Belle's residence in the Beast's castle. Also, it would support her sisters' portrayal as greedy, materialistic girls. Griffin4prez (talk) 15:34, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional info

message: Please click on this link ()  and you will see that it goes to the French language article. These templates also collect info in other areas of Wikipedia which is why we use them in preference to the old link that you are entering. Please read WP:EGG we are supposed to use direct links not euphemistic ones. Ignoring both of these can be considered disruptive editing for which you may be blocked and there is no reason for that to happen when most of your other edits have been productive ones. MarnetteD | Talk 04:32, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Links do not have to be direct as long as it's clear where the link is going, and it is absolutely clear in this case, MarnetteD, plus it is better English. When both can be achieved, why would you alter that? The language template is all well and good, except you're ignoring the reason I changed it in this case. Thanks for understanding. 123.243.242.213 (talk) 04:43, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Your change to the language template is not needed since it goes to the same article either way. MarnetteD | Talk 04:49, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, the link remains unchanged, as it should, and a mention that it's the UK title too is added, which can't be done with the current template. That's the only difference changing from the link, so I'd like to understand why you reverted? It's not US Wikipedia. 123.243.242.213 (talk) 05:37, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

text: Here's the first three sources that I can think of. Which one would you like me to reference as proof in the article or should I include all three? Maybe I should use all three to be sure that someone won't revert for the heck of it. I'm not sure why your edit summary says "it is not the UK title" when you clearly haven't bothered to check. 123.243.242.213 (talk) 05:37, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah now I see the misunderstanding. The opening sentence in the lede is simply giving the translation of the French title - it is not stating what the title is in various countries. Nor is it meant to. With this being the case it does not matter what the title is in various countries since that is not what the lede is trying to cover. My apologies for the confusion but we do not need to replace the language template per WP:MOSFILM MarnetteD | Talk 05:56, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

text: I appreciate that it is the language being referred to when the word "French" is used, but US and UK titles are always mentioned in the lede. Usually these countries use the same titles, but when they don't, the one that isn't chosen as the article title is mentioned in the lede since English Wikipedia caters for all English-speaking countries. WP:NCFILM. One could put in brackets after the French title brackets that the UK also uses the French title and not the title of the article, but there's no need to clutter it up like that. "French and UK title" is not grammatically problematic. 123.243.242.213 (talk) 06:28, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

text: The language template should be used in all cases, and it also puts the article into the (hidden) category of :Category:Articles containing French-language text too. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:51, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, British readers (who, for this type of film, I would argue are about the same in number as American readers) reading the lede (which many people don't read beyond) would assume that the UK title is Beauty and the Beast from the current version. I think it's a shame that Wikipedia sometimes seems tailored for American readers.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.243.242.213 (talk) 12:00, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: How exactly is it tailored to American readers? We provide the two titles by which it is known in the English language and that should sufficiently identify the film to an English language reader. If a reader searches on Le Belle et la Bete a redirect brings them to this article anyway. The purpose of the opening sentence is not to tell readers what the film was called in their particular country (this is not the American/British readers Wikipedia, it is the English-language Wikipedia and there are about two hundred countries in the world), but to identify the subject matter of the article. Betty Logan (talk) 12:34, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disagreement about structure of first sentence 

message: The latest set of edits by various IPs and Mare-Silverus are WP:OR and WP:SYNTH. They also fall under WP:NOTESSAY. There are numerous places on the web for this person(s) to write about them just not here. MarnetteD|Talk 16:56, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Original research

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Beauty and the Beast (1946 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120330080408/http://www.lamaisondesenseignants.com/index.php?action=afficher&rub=33&id=61 to http://lamaisondesenseignants.com/index.php?action=afficher&rub=33&id=61
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:58, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: — Assignment last updated by Elsahughes (talk) 05:53, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: History of French Cinema I, 1895-1960