lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Human Rights in Sri Lanka

message: See 
===Kattankudi mosque massacre===
here are some of the references I'll try and get you more Netmonger 06:55, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Massacre series project (Priority A)

message: here are some of the references I'll try and get you more Netmonger 06:55, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Kattankudi mosque massacre]]

message: Hi everyone. March is Women's History Month and I'm hoping a few folks here at WP:Human Rights in Sri Lanka will have interest in putting on events related to women's rights in Sri Lanka. We've created an event page on English Wikipedia (please translate!) and I hope you'll find the inspiration to participate. These events can take place off wiki, like edit-a-thons, or on wiki, such as themes and translations. Please visit the page here: WikiWomen's History Month. Thanks for your consideration and I look forward to seeing events take place! SarahStierch (talk) 19:10, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiWomen's History Month 

message: Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment on the WikiProject X proposal 

message: Hello everyone!
You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!
Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.
Harej (talk) 16:57, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject X is live!
Talk:Yulin, Guangxi

message: The english translation about Rongxian and Fumian have been changed. The reason for the changes is try to make it unique and formal. As the old tranlation for 福绵管理区, Fumian Management Districts, only the people who know the chinese can understand what it actually stands for. As we use pinyin as the translation, it would make those names more unique on the earth. Secondly, they are ore sensible for locals as well, espeically on those who don't know english at all to point out the direction for foreigners.
hey there .I think the 福绵管理区 shall change to 福绵区,that's better .  —Preceding unsigned comment added by SpeedX2008 (talk • contribs) 03:10, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

message: Bit of a war going on over content like [ this]. --192.75.48.8 (talk) 19:42, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Look at the references. It's all about dog meat. Nothing about the actual city. You people are obsessed with it. --2.245.84.38 (talk) 11:19, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit war - dog meat festival
Talk:Chandelier neuron

message: I'd like to know. Maybe chandelier cells are a subtype of axo-axonic cells (AAC)? While googling, I stumble upon phrases like "chandelier (axo-axonic) cell" and "axo-axonic chandelier cell". "Moreover, AACs are a subpopulation within the subpopulation of parvalbumin-containing interneurons" If anybody knows in full the modern classification of GABAergic interneurons, please explain. --CopperKettle 13:54, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanx, brudda kemist! CopperKettle 13:56, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is "chandelier" synonymous to "axo-axonic"?
Talk:Drag curve (gliders)

message: The article states that the gradient of the line from the origin to a point on the curve gives the glide ratio.  As airspeed is measured in the direction of travel of the aircraft - i.e. slightly downwards - this does not seem to be quite right (though it will be very close).  Does anyone know whether the glide ratio is actually descent over horizontal travel vs. descent over travel down the glide? Dhlsmith (talk) 14:33, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The glide ratio is defined to be horizontal distance traveled divided by vertical distance traveled. An instantaneous value of glide ratio can be determined by taking horizontal speed and dividing it by vertical speed. Horizontal speed through the air is true airspeed multiplied by the cosine of the glide angle so it is not the same as true airspeed.  For powered airplanes with conventional wings, and gliders, the glide angle is small enough that the cosine can be considered to be one. Consequently, for these aircraft the true airspeed and the horizontal speed through the air can be considered to be the same. Dolphin (t) 06:35, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Difference between airspeed and horizontal airspeed
Talk:Cardinals over 80 in 1978 Papal conclaves

message: Useful as this information is, it seems unreasonable to me to devote an entire article to it when the main articles don't even contain a list of the other cardinals. I'm quite aware that the duplication might look slightly awkward, but by being part of more volatile articles, they have a chance to be elegantly fitted in. Let's therefore put this information in a place that is both more public and more convenient for everyone.
Weasel 14:07, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger
Talk:Flyingbolt

message: I have now provided an external link to a very recent newspaper article on this horse, give people time to improve it.  If you look at "what links here" you will see that there were several red links to this article before I created it, suggesting that it was needed. PatGallacher 14:12, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe a better question: when was he gelded? (Ouch!)   Carlo Scalzi ♠ drop that knife! ♠  10:57, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Leftwich

message: #Article needs to be massively expanded using Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements as a guide.
#It should make use of sections, using Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements as a guide.
#Infobox to be added (use Template:Infobox UK place.)
#Photos need to be added.
#References and Citations are crucial for wikipedia, and so these must be added as the article is expanded. Make sure that as many as possible are "in-line" citations.(See WP:References, WP:V, and WP:CITE for guidance.)
Peter I. Vardy 09:38, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment Report 

message: Action Item: When I search for just "leftwich" this page  comes up, but why not ALSO a search result describing the military vessel called the USS Leftwich?  Thanks if someone can reply I would really appreciate it! Vid2vid 18:26, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably because no one who writes about places in Cheshire know about the USA ship, whose correct reference on wikipedia is USS Leftwich. Now that we do, I'll add a disambig phrase at the top of the article. It has to be done this way because the correct search term for the ship is USS Leftwich, and Leftwich (this article) is correct for the name of this settlement, and they aren't identical. I hope that addresses your concern.  DDStretch  (talk) 20:04, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, I don't think I will do it. If I use SEARCH on the term "Leftwich" I do get a listing for the ship, its the third one down on my list. There are also a lot of names as well. In that case, I won't do anything until someone else has commented as adding just one out of many possible may not reflect consensus over what to do.  DDStretch  (talk) 20:08, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you User:ddstretch -- From, Vid2vid (talk) 17:35, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Question about wikipedia search term: "Leftwich"
Talk:Paduka Seri Begawan Sultan Science College

message: Paduka Seri Begawan Sultan Science College (Malay: Maktab Sains Paduka Seri Begawan Sultan) is considered the best government-run secondary school in Brunei Darussalam.---> seems like a passing statement. I suggest rephrasing this to "one of the best" instead of "the best".61.6.192.98 14:26, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Phrasing
Talk:List of municipalities of the Flemish Region

message: I think the municipalities of the Brussels-Capital Region should be removed from this list. This list is about the municipalities in the Flemish Region, of which the Brussels-Capital Region is not a part. There are, however, members of the Flemish Community who live in the Brussels-Capital Region, but I don't think that should affect this article, especially as they're not included in the article about the Walloon Region despite the large number of members of the French Community living in the municipalities of Brussels. --Ganchelkas 14:28, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, this list is about the Flemish region, not about the Flemish community. Markussep 15:22, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Is it OK for me to add the names of the municipalities in other languages (if any) in parentheses?--Ganchelkas 10:54, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think we shouldn't add too much information to the list. Alternative names are also given in French exonyms#Belgium, List of Dutch exonyms for places in Belgium and List of German exonyms for places in Belgium. Markussep 13:42, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Why Mommy Is a Democrat

message: Can anyone find a professional review, not just reader reviews and political reviews (as these are not encyclopedic)?
Also, any idea on getting "fair use" images for the front and an expansion of the general storyline of the book?--Vox Rationis 14:31, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, the contrasting book Help! Mom! There Are Liberals Under My Bed includes critism not only on the book, but on indocterning young children with political oppinions. A summary is fine, but this one was obviously written with a slant.--Romulus (talk) 04:19, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: What about "Why Daddy is a Republican" 149.20.252.132 (talk) 16:02, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Public Response

message: I'm pretty sure this is a joke. The website looks like a fraud. This is a joke, right? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 63.245.145.77 (talk) 02:29, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No. This is an actual book. It has appeared on talk shows. Rush Limbaugh has commented on it. It is even selling on Amazon.com. --Vox Rationis (Talk | contribs) 02:36, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  You've got to be kidding me.
Talk:AIDS service organization

message: As this article is a stub with only one source and little beyond a definition currently, I plan to completely flesh out this article. I am planning on writing about the factors which resulted in the creation of these service organizations, as well as the difficulties they faced, and how that has changed or remained stagnant over time. Additionally, I would like to compile as much of a list of AIDS service organizations as possible, especially those which have been/continue to be very influential in relief, and that connect to other fully-formed Wikipedia articles, especially those in the HIV/AIDS Wikiproject.
Mikic4 (talk) 23:19, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:National Museum of Indonesia

message: 'the Museum Nasional is not only a centre for research and study into the national and cultural heritage - in the tyext that does not make sense in english - please edit accordingly SatuSuro 09:37, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: meaning please

message: ===Admission===
The National Museum is currently closed after the fire that took place on 16th September 2023. It is expected that it reopens again in September 2024
===Parking===
The front courtyard and basement parking lot can accomodate cars and tour busses.
===Tours (not active at the moment)===
The Indonesian Heritage Society conducts tours of the museum at following times:
English: 
* Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday: 9.30 AM
* Last Sunday of every month: 10.30 AM
Japanese:
* Tuesday: 10 AM
* First Sunday of every month: 10 AM
German:
* Thursday: 10 AM
The times and dates of guided tours in Dutch and French can be obtained and arranged by call the Indonesian Heritage Society Office at Museum Nasional on (62-21) 381 1551 extension 46.
===Rules===
* Visitors are kindly asked to refrain from smoking, eating, and drinking in all areas of the museum
* Visitor are prohibited from touching the exhibits
* Deposit boxes to store visitor's bags and belongings are available in the entrance
* In some areas of the museum is prohibited to take pictures
===Gift Shop===
The museum cafetaria and gift shop is located in the new wing and has the same opening hours as the rest of the museum. It offers a selection of books, postcards, and reproductions of various exhibits.
--Rochelimit (talk) 19:57, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: General Information (moved from the main article)

message: The museum cafetaria and gift shop is located in the new wing and has the same opening hours as the rest of the museum. It offers a selection of books, postcards, and reproductions of various exhibits.
--Rochelimit (talk) 19:57, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Gift Shop
Talk:Arnolt Schlick

message: I really like this article, so I hope my addition doesn't mess anything up. Please revert/discuss/comment if it does. The existing paragraph on the Spiegel der Orgelmacher was referenced mostly to a single source. I've added a second reference, Peter Williams history, which dedicates a complete chapter to Schlick, and gives beautiful examples of his style of writing. I've added just a couple of examples paraphrased from Williams, illustrating the interpretation necessary to understand Schlick across the centuries, and illustrating what his practical descriptions today have led authors like Williams to infer about attitudes to music (e.g. the role of the bass line) back in those days. I hope this is okay. Elemimele (talk) 16:55, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition to Spiegel der Orgelmacher
Talk:Ayesha Jhulka

message: did she debuted in the movie, Kurbaan (1991)? does anybody know the title of that really long song(about 10 minutes) in that movie?Carlji 20:40, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There are lots of articles saying her birthday, but what year was she born.  All I could find was something saying she was born in 1975 which if she graduated in 1986 would seem implausible , not that I know anything much about convents, but how many people would graduate at 11.  Anything saying what age she was with a date would indicate a year of birth, in the picture of her shown on the wikipedia page (a picture from a 1992 film) I would have said that that was a woman in her 20s, although of course this couldn't be taken as given and her appearance in a picture could only be used to narrow down a search along with other details to rule out anything which seemed implausible in order to find a reliable source that gave an age or year of birth.--Lord of the Isles 15:48, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Born
Talk:Schermerhorn–Drees cabinet

message: "Presentation of the incoming cabinet at the Binnenhof on 4 June 1946"
But that is only a month before the Schermerhorn–Drees cabinet was dissolved, according to the article, and nearly a year after it was established; so surely there is a mistake somewhere? Harfarhs (talk) 21:33, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem with photo caption
Talk:Health Minister (Denmark)

message: I've re-established Ministry of Health (Denmark) based on a translation of the Danish Wikipedia article, and included in it the list of ministers that forms most of this article. Minister of Health (Denmark) has always redirected to the article on the ministry, and I believe it would be more logical for this one to do the same; I can't see what information would usefully be in this article that would not logically belong in the article on the ministry. I note that  created both this and the ministry article, both on the same day in 2006, so I'm pinging them in case they have an argument I haven't thought of (or can see any deleted revisions that make the picture less clear). But I don't see the need for a full merge discussion; does anyone else who may be watching? Yngvadottir (talk) 17:49, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: For example for the US government, all the secretaries (ministers) have their own article, see e.g. United States Secretary of Health and Human Services. I guess there can be multiple notable positions within a ministry which are notable enough in themselves to warrant a separate more in-depth wiki article; look at all the links at United_States_Secretary_of_Defense#Succession. So in theory a separate article can make sense; whether there is enough content that a separate article makes sense Health Minister (Denmark) for now is another question. Thue (talk) 22:21, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see what it could contain that the article on the ministry doesn't. (Currently the only way in which this article has more information is that it has the precise dates of their terms, day and month as well as year.) In theory I could take the list of ministers out of the ministry article, but I don't see the logic in having that list in a separate article, and where would the list of permanent secretaries go then? Yngvadottir (talk) 04:23, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: You could make a history of notable ministers and their actions. Obviously the current article obviously contains no such thing, but it could in the future. Thue (talk) 11:02, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a thought, but the ministry doesn't have much history because it keeps getting combined with other ministries. If you know of any such material—relating to their tenure at the health ministry, specifically—then could you add a brief summary? Otherwise I think I'll go ahead and make it a redirect in a few days, with a very clear edit summary of course. (I think there's a template for "redirect with history"). I'm inclined to think someone would have included such material somewhere on da.wikipedia, though, and I checked all the ministers' articles there to determine how to link them, and didn't see anything, and I didn't notice anything in the sources I incorporated in the article on the ministry. Yngvadottir (talk) 12:55, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Make redirect?
Talk:River Wear

message: The length of the river is currently given in the article as 60 miles (reckoned as 96km in one place and 97km in another!). It presumably relates to the length of the watercourse from Wearhead which does appear to be traditional source of the Wear down to its entry into the North Sea. This figure is not referenced. As a piece of original research I have painstakingly measured the length using the tool on the wheresthepath website and the point at which the river enters the harbour entrance is 110.4km (or 68.5 miles) from the confluence at Wearhead. It is a further 0.7km to the exit into the open sea between Roker and New South piers. I am confident of the accuracy within 1km but the figure cannot of itself be used in the article. It can however be used as a guide in searching for a suitably referenced figure published elsewhere in accordance with WP guidelines. The two main headwater streams of the Wear are the Killhope Beck which by the same token comes in at 8.6km (or 5.3 miles) and the Scraith Burn/Burnhope Burn which attains 8.1km (or 5 miles) at the same point (taking a mid-line through Burnhope Reservoir). Thus the longest path that a raindrop falling at Killhope Head (furthest point of any headwater) might reasonably be described as taking to the sea is 119km or 73.8 miles. None of these figures should make their way into the article itself unless (forgive me!) 'sourced' elsewhere. Geopersona (talk) 09:55, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Length of river
Talk:Aircraft Industries

message: Title does not match lead. Enigmamsg 15:40, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official name 

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that :File:LET L-410NG OK-NGA ILA Berlin 2016 09.jpg, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for December 7, 2022. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2022-12-07. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! --Ahecht (TALKPAGE) 20:40, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured picture scheduled for POTD
Talk:Państwowe Zakłady Lotnicze

message: There is a mess regarding names of post-1945 factories and aircraft designations. I don't know when Union of Aerospace Industry became Union of Aerospace and Engine Industry PZL (ZPLiS PZL). My educated guess is, that soon after end of stalinism in 1956 - and around this time, first newly designed planes with PZL name started to appear (PZL-101 Gawron, PZL M-2), even though factories were named WSK. I can't figure out, if (and when) WSK-Mielec was renamed WSK PZL-Mielec - possibly only after 1989. Also, I can't find reliable information, if some aircraft  officially carried designation PZL, especially TS-8 and TS-11. Evidently during a period 1950-1956 the designation PZL was non-existent at all (probably it was banned as pre-war "capitalist" one). aircraft Pibwl ←« 20:03, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Names

message: Today most of these companies are independent entities. Thus I would suggest that the main article "PZL" be of a retrospective or historical nature and separate articles be made for all companies that emerged out of the PZL idustrial complex. PZL-Mielec is now owned by the Sikorsky unit of United Technologies Corp. PZL-Rzeszow is also owned by UTC, PZL-Okecie is nowdays owned by EADS-CASA while PZL-Swidnik is part owned by Agusta-Westland and so on.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.114.221.10 (talk) 17:04, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Concur. I know next to nothing about the companies, but I'd be willing to start some of the other article using PZL Mielec as a pattern, if someone else would be willing to fill in the gaps on each new page, and condense down this article. I can also help with the formatting issues, if needed. - BillCJ (talk) 18:12, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Different Companies 

message: Hello. How old is this PZL? http://www.naftemporiki.gr/news/static/09/08/27/1706949.htm
Thank you  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.68.182.147 (talk) 11:56, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  how old is this PZL?