lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Alam Ara

message: Is this entry about the musician or the film? Cnwb 02:03, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Could somebody please put up the movie title in Devanagari and Nastaaliq? I can't tell for sure how to pronounce it because of the vague (though popular) romanization, though I suspect it's "Aalam Aaraa." I'd like to know how this is really pronounced, so putting up these two transcriptions would really help. Thanks! --Kuaichik 00:06, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Devanagari/Nastaliq 

message: * Stardust, production and release --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 11:57, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: Alam Ara () is a 1931 Indian film directed by Ardeshir Irani. It was the first Indian sound film.Goddard, John. "Missouri Masala Fear not, St. Louisans: You don't need to go to Bombay to get your Bollywood fix" Riverfront Times, St. Louis, Missouri, 30 July 2003, Music section.
Irani recognised the importance that sound would have on the cinema, and raced to complete Alam Ara before several contemporary sound films. Alam Ara debuted at the Majestic Cinema in Mumbai (then Bombay) on 14 March 1931. The first Indian talkie was so popular that "police aid had to be summoned to control the crowds."Quoted in Chatterji (1999), "The History of Sound." The film was houseful for the next 8 weeks of its release. It was advertised with the tagline "All living, breathing, 100 percent talking".
The film has long been lost and was not available as far back as 1967 according to the National Film Archive of India, Pune.Alam Ara long lost, was never with NFAI: founder-director Indian Express, 17 March 2011, Retrieved:2013-04-26
--Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 08:14, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed text
Talk:History of public transport authorities in London

message: Herbert Morrison was not Minister of Transport in 1933, so something is wrong here. Adam 02:35, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Adam.. you´re right about Herbert.M. But he was Transport Minister until 1931 and responsible for the Act of Parliament creating London Transport. Maybe the text should be amended ?? Greetings from Berlin IsarSteve 11:53, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Herbert Morrison

message: I find this article infuriating! It has the heading London Transport - the name never actually given to any organisation controlling the capital's transport - and then it skates through fifteen years hardly mentioning what the LPTB was or did; it then says "nationalised in 1948" without saying that it was separate from the other rail-based organisations; and then virtually ignores further other changes until it reaches Transport for London (ignoring the fact of a comprehensive article there). It is almost as if there isn't any worthwhile history in between! 
:Which explains why I have done something about it!!! Peter Shearan 13:44, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: well done Peter!IsarSteve 16:41, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Well done. It made me jump to see it so radicaly changed. TAS 17:27, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: London Transport
Talk:Cray T3D

message: ... using 256 150MHz Alpha processors. Every processor had 8MB RAM, resulting in a 16 GB overal memory. 256*8MB = 2GB, not 16GB. Until someone figures out whether the processors had 64MB of memory each, or the total system memory was 2GB, I'm commenting this out. grendel|khan 03:03, 2005 Mar 2 (UTC)
:It was probably meant to be megawords. Cray had big words, I think... Rsynnott 18:25, 15 November 2005 (UTC)

message: This stub article appears to refer to one particular T3D installation rather than the general product offering from Cray. 2.26.148.31 (talk) 10:11, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cray's T3D product vs. one instance of it.
Talk:The Carol Burnett Show

message: The text says the show was ranked No. 35 in 1976-77, while the information box later in the article says it was ranked No. 15 during that time period. Neither claim is sourced. 71.234.44.10 (talk) 15:10, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the notice. The ratings chart was partially incorrect (it must have been tampered with). And I've added a source. --Musdan77 (talk) 23:43, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistent Information 

message: A source will need to be found before this can be added, but I clearly recall the success of the 2001 Show Stoppers special, and subsequent renewal of interest in the Carol Burnett Show, was credited in part to American audiences seeking comic relief in the weeks and months after 9/11. 70.72.211.35 (talk) 21:40, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Post-9/11 impact 

message: Mr. Tudball and wife spoke with an accent. What kind of accent was that supposed to be?77Mike77 (talk) 15:47, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accent 

message: It looks like most of the text for Background is superfluous and really has nothing to do with the creation of the show itself. The last paragraph dealing with Burnett's contract is in fact the imeptus for the creation of the show, whereas the rest is just facts about Burnett's past credits. I suggest these paragraphs be moved to a section on the Carol Burnett page. Leopea (talk) 09:21, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move '''Background''' text 

message: It states in the beginning that the CBS producer in charge of variety offered Burnett the sitcom "Here's Agnes". But if memory serves and unless it was removed, I thought Desilu and Lucille Ball ofered this to Burnett?
Thanks The brave celery (talk) 12:10, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: You're in luck. A day or two before, I watched a youtube video of Burnett on The Late Show with Stephen Colbert.  At about the 4:15 mark, she talks about how she got The Carol Burnett Show. Long story short, she called a CBS vice president about activating a clause in her contract that gave her the option of a TV show. The VP wasn't thrilled about a woman having a variety show and offered her Here's Agnes instead (around 6:15). Clarityfiend (talk) 12:33, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, CBS offered the would-be sitcom to Burnett. It's very well-documented, also on the Archive of American Television interview here. Leopea (talk) 14:51, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction: "Here's Agnes" sitcom 

message: CBS Television Distribution acquired digital rights to the series.
CBSTD acquires digital rights to Carol Burnett library 67.45.113.179 (talk) 03:58, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distribution rights
Category talk:Literature by country

message: Is it necessary to have a parallel category by language? — Instantnood 16:51, July 30, 2005 (UTC)
* I was just thinking that actually it makes much more sense to have :Category:Literature by language (which we do have) be the primary tree for literature.  Within literature by language, country categories can be used if sensible. (For instance, :Category:Canadian literature could exist under :Category:French language literature and under :Category:English language literature.) ... I realize this probably will upset the nationalists but literature seems to be best organized by language, as exogenous creatures seem best organized by bioregion. --Lquilter (talk) 13:21, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[:Category:Literature by language]]

message: It seems that we have a very good solution here but that solution is not generally applied, and because of that we have a total mess in many categories and subcategories. The main cause of that problem lies in the use of ambiguous adjective-style category titles. That problem is wisely avoided in the case of :Category:English literature. That ambiguous adjective-style tile is properly used as a disambiguation category. Same solution should be applied in all cases where an adjective designates both the country and the language. In those cases, all categories for literature of particular countries should be styled according to the :Category:Literature of England model, while categories for literature written in particular languages should be styled according to the :Category:English-language literature model. Sorabino (talk) 10:47, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "English model" should be generally applied
Talk:Kottayam district

message: I was surprised to see the atribution to Pallikkoodam. Is it world renouned????. If yes, in which sense??. We might have to change the meaning for 'World Renouned'. Informations which come here sould be accurate, I feel.
Manjithkaini 03:16, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pallikkoodam World Renouned???? 

message: Vipin Sunny Varghese
Reading Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not before you edit articles would be appreciated. 
Jisha C J 19:45, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: 202.88.237.62

message: Word for word, the article on the district is a copy of an article from another website! And the article on Kottayam town was exactly identical to this, until drastic changes were made not only in un-making it a copy from the other website, but also in making it focused on the town rather than on the district.  As for this article on the district, inspite of some minor changes that has been done recently, it still is a copy of the article from that other website. Maybe some editors can do a thorough re-work on this article. 192.30.202.19 17:00, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kottayam district 

message: Greetings, at the SA section I added article St Thomas Church Arunoottimangalam here even though the article mentions religion under the Demographics section heading. Going forward if this article is expanded, perhaps with a "Religions" section, the wikilink for St. Thomas Church could be moved there. Regards, — JoeHebda • (talk) 13:13, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added "See also" section 
Talk:Split dollar game

message: I don't want to remove hard work by another, but I think I unkowningly created a more complete page on this topic under the name Ultimatum game.  I don't know the term "Split dollar game", but this may refer to either the Ultimatum game or the Nash bargaining game both which involve spliting a dollar.  I don't know the standard for dealing with this issue, so I will just leave this note for a bit.  Kzollman
:Merged. Thank you.  EventHorizon  talk 04:55, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Flavia Colgan

message: Utter lack of notability.  Why is this still here?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Avocats (talk • contribs) 04:20, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably because of a Wikipedia community desire to add more biographies of women, and women of Latina heritage, to "balance" the content here.  - 332dash (talk) 17:27, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Doesn't satisfy Wikipedia standards

message: Maybe there could be links beteen Flavia Monteiro Colgan  & flavia_?
Thank You.
[[ hopiakuta  | [[ %c2%a1 %c2%bf  %7e%7e%7e%7e  -]] 00:55, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Sign]]. [[%c2%a1]] [[%c2%bf]] [[ %7e%7e%7e%7e ]] 

message: I notice you added  to the article. May you list them here (or in the article) so we don't get another AfD? ~UN6892 tc 18:59, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The ELs contain some reference materials. - UtherSRG (talk) 21:11, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  I looked at the external links given. I can't access WSJ so I'll assume you read it and it is indeed about Colgan. It and Citizen Hunter (at least an archive of it) seem to both have SIGCOV of her, though I am unsure of the latter's reliability given it's an advocacy site. Mainline Today seems reliable but all of it except one paragraph is an interview (not independent) so I don't think it is significant. The rest are either dead or not independent, so I am unsure if the subject is notable. The WP:BEFORE search I did was inconclusive. ~UN6892 tc 23:14, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: There's also a Media Matters piece (which I found during that search), though the source's reliability is uncertain. ~UN6892 tc 23:19, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Florida breaks

message: see also: sources for Beacham Theatre #Cultural impact
Kids with Macs and their own record labels are turning the pre-fab, Disney backwater of Orlando, FL into the Seattle of Electronica by John Wier;   The 1997 "Hot Issue" of Rolling Stone, Issue 767: August 21, 1997Johnvr4 (talk) 20:16, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional sources for the Orlando Sound/ Florida breaks 

message: see also:  sources for  Beacham Theater #Late Night at the Beacham Theater (1988—1994)  
Additional sources from VICE/THUMP:
Florida History *in 5 (or 6) parts  
* 1. https://thump.vice.com/en_us/topic/miami-bass
* 2. https://thump.vice.com/en_us/article/florida-breaks-in-the-1990s-beats-get-sleazy-in-the-weirdo-armpit-of-america
* 3. https://thump.vice.com/en_us/article/the-essential-rave-nightclubs-of-floridian-history
* 4. https://thump.vice.com/en_us/article/trippy-chems-and-strange-moogs-schematic-idm-and-the-beginning-of-miamis-downtown-music-scene
* 5. https://thump.vice.com/en_us/article/setting-the-bar-how-florida-music-festivals-became-the-standard-of-the-american-dance-experience
* 6. https://thump.vice.com/en_us/article/90s-djs-where-are-they-now  Johnvr4 (talk) 16:34, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: For Simon's  Panic @ The Disco (February 5, 2017) Vincent McDonald; The Fine Print. Johnvr4 (talk) 20:50, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Florida Origin 

message: Is this section: Florida_breaks#Florida_breaks_artists redundant given this list: Breakbeat#Notable_breakbeat_artists?  I did not compare nor did I check for notability.  Johnvr4 (talk) 16:43, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The list of Breakbeat#Notable_breakbeat_artists does not appear to be a list of Florida artists.  The previously non-referenced Florida_breaks#Florida_breaks_artists section (with Florida DJs) was deleted without discussion in this diff.  I have recreated the section with notable DJs from reliable sources. I've also created a notable/reliable early venues section. Johnvr4 (talk) 20:49, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Artists section
Talk:Elk Cloner

message: Which language was used to program the virus? Assembler? Would be nice to know... 134.2.188.3 12:16, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Which language

message: Not to make it sound self-centered, but I wrote an article on Elk Cloner for a class and published it on my blog I post my research essays on. It has sources if you'd be willing to look over them and determine whether or not you would want to use my article as a source or the sources I used from my article. Either way, here's the link to my article: Elk Cloner
Superslacker87 16:49, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:NOADSJasper Deng (talk) 05:13, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: self-centered

message: According to this article Elk Cloner was not the first virus. 21:45, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not the first virus 
Talk:Ed Korfanty

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment Drive
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 00:04, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: This article needs:
* References
* Some personal history (age, place of birth, etc.)
* More details on his training
* A photo
Twisted86 06:06, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  To do... 
Template talk:Infobox Switzerland municipality

message: Hi, I've noticed that all of the articles that use this template have some stray text up at the top that just reads "popofyear" (ex: the top of Bern), regardless of whether or not the article is using that parameter in the infobox call. It's definitely within this line of code:

Could someone please fix this? Thanks! - OpalYosutebito (talk) 22:26, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: That was me trying to fix something. My apologies for the excessive edits today; there was some extremely unusual testing going on in and around the check for unknown parameters, and I had to look through the edits and edit summaries one by one until I figured it out. I think it's all fixed now. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:29, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: It's ok. The stray text is gone now, thanks :) - OpalYosutebito (talk) 22:34, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  popofyear? 

message: Articles including Bern are being placed in  even though they are getting data from Wikidata a template, , and its allied templates. Pinging , who added this check and category. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:31, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The category is passed whenever / is used. If you omit the parameter set then it autofills it from the same template. There's no way the infobox can tell whether its input comes from a template. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:19, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Manual population" category false positives 

message: Greetings and felicitations.  Would please make the "iso-code-region" visible, as it is in most other country and first level subdivision infoboxes?  (I'm afraid I don't know how to code/construct the change, so I can't post proposed code, but perhaps you can copy it from .) —DocWatson42 (talk) 13:38, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: * Pppery * it has begun... 03:17, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  10 April 2024 edit request
Talk:Max Born

message: The quotation regarding the source of evil, supposedly taken from Born's Nobel Prize lecture, does not appear in the lecture, as anyone can confirm (relatively brief and easy to read, it is readily available on line).
Nor does it appear in the informal speech he gave at the banquet held in his honour (https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/1954/born/speech/). The footnote on the quotation sends the reader to his son's article, where his son says it was part of the lecture; since he includes one of the German phrases, it appears he had an original draft that may have included the quotation: if so, that source should be located.
In the meantime, the writer of this Wikipedia article might either find the source or make it clear to the reader that it's something his son, not Max Born himself, says. This is important, even though the quotation does reflect very well Born's general thought on the matter.
P.S. The German is found quoted at https://de.wikibrief.org/wiki/Max_Born, but it too lacks any reference to a source.
The Chinese Website also quotes the German, but leaves a lot out (and replicates the reference in the present English version). 159.2.65.153 (talk) 21:07, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Good that you have come here. You are probably referring to the edit that I reverted per wp:no original research. Yes, we could take it, provided a source could be found that directly supports the statement. Note however that —in artciles— we never say " We just say it and stick a proper wp:secondary source to it. Happy source hunting . - DVdm (talk) 22:00, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The quotation about the "root cause of all the evil in the world"
Talk:Amalric of Jerusalem

message: FYI, some of the dates given here for the three invasions of Egypt do not agree with the dates given on the pages for Nur ad-Din, Bilbeis, and Damietta, though it seems to agree with the Shirkuh page against the other three on one of the dates. I don't have any idea which are correct, but it would be nice if Wikipedia were at least self-consistent. — B.Bryant 06:38, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I suspect this one is wrong, if only because it comes from the 1911 Britannica and they seem to be a little off sometimes. But I'll see if I can sort it out (unless someone else does it). Adam Bishop 08:23, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Is it any better now? There were more than three invasions - he was there in 1163, 1164, 1167, 1168, and 1169. The other pages now reflect this too, I think. Adam Bishop 06:43, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Xavante

message: Sepultura recorded with the Xavante tribe on a song on their Roots album. I'm finally adding my signature- Gringo300 15:03, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: There's an article at Cultural Survival which could be useful to this article. -- Trevj (talk) 15:30, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Effects of Modernization 
Talk:Soldiers and sailors act

message: On the original page there was editorial comment:
(As the initial author of this article, some details might be inaccurate for the reason that the knowledge is from training within the banking industry from 1995 until 2001, when the author last received an update.)
''
As well as some stuff that was clearly pov, and I deleted.
Do with it what you will - i have no idea about it (just tidying)
Andrew Kepert 07:46, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Situs ambiguus

message: The correct Latin form would be situs ambiguus ("ambiguous" being an English spelling). Normally I would just move the page to the correct spelling, but I note that Google turns up 1,250 hits for the Latin spelling, and 984 for the English like spelling. This is pretty damn close, so I would rather not make the move without the advice of someone with more medical knowledge: in the literature is it usually spelled "ambiguus" or "ambiguous"? --Iustinus 08:07, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This page agrees that situs ambiguus is technically correct, but it "is commonly changed to" situs ambiguous, and then uses that term throughout in preference to ambiguus.  If "situs ambiguous" is the common name, then we should leave it here, with a note about the correct term. But I'd welcome the views of any medical professionals who are reading... -- ALoan (Talk) 12:05, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, neither of you seems too heart-set, and the mixed-language spelling bothers me, so I'm moving it. —Keenan Pepper 02:08, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Ambiguous forms

message: These are different. Situs solitus is normal, situs inversus is mirror, situs ambiguus is everything in between. So I edited "This includes the congenital defect situs inversus" to "This does not include the congenital defect situs inversus". As it was the sentence contradicted the rest of the article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kublakuzz (talk • contribs) 04:49, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: You are correct, and I've added a source to support that. - Aoidh (talk) 05:14, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Situs ambiguus does not include situs inversus
Talk:Telephone numbers in Greece

message: Compare
*List of dialing codes in Greece alphabetically
*List of dialing codes of Greece numerically
One of these should be renamed to match the other. Thryduulf 09:22, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The link to Pyrgos in "289x - rest of Heraklion prefecture" points to a disambiguation page. I guess it should point to Tylissos, but I am not sure, as there is at least another Pyrgos in the Heraklion prefecture, in Asterousia municipality. --Stegop (talk) 06:19, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pyrgos 

message: The 692 0xx xxxx series of non geografical numbers (marked with citation needed tag in text) seems to be deleted from the official eett page (http://www.eett.gr/opencms/opencms/EETT/Electronic_Communications/Telecoms/Numbering/search.html?cat=esa_non). I think it should be also deleted here. 
Regards Nikmix (talk) 05:49, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  692 0xx xxxx 

message: Why Thessalonik2311i?
--Volker Alexander (talk) 11:46, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thessalonik2311i 

message: Hi hd I love love you daddy daddy love you daddy love love you daddy I love love you mommy mommy love love you daddy daddy mommy daddy love you daddy daddy love love @you daddy daddy I @Love & Affection 174.84.127.132 (talk) 12:25, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dysehfhdgydh