Talk:Lola the Vamp

message: Recent anonymous-IP edits on this page have left us with an article that is repeated three times with minor differences, reads like a press release, includes next to no verification or sourcing, and is packed with irrelevant detail of the sort that is not meant to be included in an encyclopedia.  I'm reverting the main page to an earlier version and copying the jumble of the current text here, so that it can be worked on and made into a proper article. NEW EDITORS PLEASE NOTE that there are many guidelines for Wiki articles. WP:NOT might be a good place to start. Welcome to the Wikipedia. - Corporal Tunnel (talk) 19:24, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disastrous Edits 

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 22:40, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]] 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Lola the Vamp. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070812011906/http://www3.griffith.edu.au/01/griffithreview/past_editions.php?id=341 to http://www3.griffith.edu.au/01/griffithreview/past_editions.php?id=341
*Added  tag to http://www.tease-o-rama.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:59, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This content is moved from the article - it appears sourced, but I have been unable to verify the citations, and I am unsure what these reviews are for, because the article was not particularly clear when I started working on it. It is possible, but not verified, that these relate to the Edinburgh Fringe Festival.
:The Times: "the five women have some idea about showbiz so the whole thing rattles on with well-rehearsed panache. Exquisitely dressed (and undressed), it does not hurt that the five are all quite ravishing to look at" (The Times, 10 August 2005); 'Moreover, and this is rare in the realm of modern strip'n'show cabaret, the show tries to capture something of the original burlesque tradition - Lola The Vamp's exotic dance with floaty scarves is one instance' (The Herald, 27 August 2005); 'Lola's feather and fan dances were beautifully erotic' (Hairline Highlights, 17 August 2005).
Beccaynr (talk) 03:47, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I have also not been able to find this: Burlesque Stripped Bare The Age M Magazine March 10, 2007, by Melinda Houston, so I am moving it here. A 2006 cover story in the same publication is referred to in her SAE bio. Beccaynr (talk) 04:43, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reviews from the article