lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Sisters Grimm

message: Please refrain from chatting here. This page is for discussing issues concerning the Sisters Grimm article only. Thank you.
74.221.36.132 (talk) 03:20, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

message: Shouldn't Prince Charming just be put as "Prince Charming!? After all, he still is mayor in the first and second books as well as most of the third. Besides,it kinda ruins it for first time Sister Grimm readers. They don't know that Prince Charming is replaced by... i'll just type it. Queen of Hearts.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.26.166.83 (talk) 23:18, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  ex-mayor: Prince Charming 

message: I have noticed that many of the books in the series do not have their own articles. I am asking for this to be changed. I do not have an account, so I may not create one. Please consider this. 74.96.4.195 (talk) 00:38, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Books Without Articles 

message: Its probably silly of me, but I don't think Elvis should be listed as a minor character. He is VERY important!!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.228.238.254 (talk) 03:52, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elvis 

message: Is it just me, or do other people think this page contains SPOILERS?   I mean, I've read them all, but if I hadn't, I would be very disspointed to know some of these things.
98.226.198.164 (talk) 22:58, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spoilers 

message: Uh... HELLO?!  Charming isn't a minor character!!!!!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.226.198.164 (talk) 01:21, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Charming 

message: SHE ON THE FRONT COVER OF THE THRID BOOK FOR PETE'S SAKE? SHE'S PART OF THE GRIM FAMILY, SHE HAD POSSESSION OVER THERE PARENTS FOR A WHILE, AND THERE LITTLE BROTHER, SHE IS KINDA RESPONSIBLE FOR LIKE 1/8 OF THE THINGS THAT HAPPEN IN THE SERIES, SHE HAS A SERIOUS CONNECTION/FRIENDSHIP WITH MR.CANIS AND INHERITS THE WOLF'S POWER. AND UNLIKE CANIS CAN ACTUALLY CONTROL IT, REALLY? RED RIDING HOOD IS A MINOR CHARACTER?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.127.65.135 (talk) 17:35, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  RED RIDING HOOD, MINOR CHARACTER? 
Talk:Early British popular music

message: Don't you think that the music from Gilbert and Sullivan's operettas should be included here? This was very popular, with high volumes of sheet music sales and was also one of the country's first great musical exports, selling very well in the USA?
Between the end of this article and the beginning of the next, there is a major musical form omitted: Big bands: Harry Roy, Billy Cotton, Carroll Gibbons, Jack Payne, Jack Hylton, Henry Hall and many other British bands were hugely popular. And yet, no mention. Ogg 19:43, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  G & S 

message: I think this article usefully deals with some issues in trying to organise British music, perhaps the following needs to be added by anyone who can, Brass bands, choral societies, dance bands. Also traditional ballads predated broadside ballads. I will modify that section when I get time if no one objects.--Sabrebd (talk) 21:28, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Other forms
Talk:Muzo

message: Muzo is a Toronto based jamband started in 2005.  The band features Mike Wise on lead guitar and vocals, Zach Bines on rhythm guitar and vocals, Mike Kirsh on bass, and Ben Weigensberg on drums.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.43.160.70 (talk • contribs) 
good for you, create the article Muzo (band) --I am greener than you! (Lima - Charlie - Over) 17:54, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Rebecca Miller (EastEnders)

message: *EastEnders storyline claims 58% share -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 17:19, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Alfred Pringsheim

message: However, the article definitely needs more information on Pringsheim's achievements in mathematics. Can someone who is familiar with his publications help out here?
--Remotelysensed (talk) 18:04, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Input on mathematics needed 

message: Funny anecdote from a 1964 interview with one of his students (cited in Rechenberg's 2010 biography of Heisenberg, another student at the same time, p. 95):
> Pringsheim verbrachte gelegentlich eine halbe Stunde, um den Begriff der Riemannschen Fläche lächerlich zu machen. Wir bekamen nie ein Integral zu Gesicht, wir arbeiteten nur mit Mittelwerten und ähnlichen Begriffen, unendliche Reihen, was Sommerfeld vollständig ablehnte.
Not enough for a new section on its own, but there must be more stories about a guy with such a distinctive teaching style. Leaving this breadcrumb in the meantime.
2600:1702:6D1:28B0:FCAB:2026:B4:63C4 (talk) 02:33, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Teaching style, contempt for the concept of [[Riemann surface]]s?
Talk:Local Self-Defence in Lithuania during the Nazi occupation (1941–1944)

message: I do not speak Lithuanian, but I believe this article is a copyright violation of the source provided in the article.  Anyone who can convert the original source should determine if this is a violation.--Gay Cdn  (talk) (email) (Contr.) 15:45, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

message: This article seems totally POV, right from the title "Self-Defence" for what was collaboration with the occupation to the supposedly "agressive" intentions of the USSR towards Lithuania right through to an alleged Soviet "war against the Lithuanian peasantry". We cannot have an article with is written through this filter of Lithuanian nationalism and anti-Sovietism. Booshank 02:45, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "Self-defence" was an official name for these units, and it indeed was self defence of population against various gangs. I must dismiss these ridiculuous objections from a person who puts Soviet aggression into the quotation marks as it is something that never happened. Sigitas 11:05, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  It was only "aggression" from a Lithuanian nationalist perspective; one person's "aggression" is another's "liberation". Booshank 23:15, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Lithuania as a nation is one, other nations perspectives mostly do justify the occupations. --Lokyz (talk) 23:20, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Tell us Booshank, was the invasion and occupation of Lithuania by the Red Army in 1940 "Liberation" as well? One must be a hard-line Communist to actually claim if not believe that. --41.151.13.97 (talk) 21:07, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV article 

message: This is article about villagers selfdefence, not Tautinio Darbo Apsaugos Batalionas or other Police batalions. Historiography on the subject is rather a mess, an internet forums make it even worse.--Lokyz (talk) 03:59, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Confusion is that officially the police battalions (Selbstschutz) were known as self-defence units. This self-defence has nothing to do with the battalions. Renata (talk) 15:22, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

text: Shouldn't this be clarified in the text, maybe even in the lead? I don't think I'm the first one who misunderstood.radek (talk) 19:27, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Selbstschutz or not 

message: I agree with the POV statement above, but was sufficiently interested to rewrite in order to make it more objective and to ensure a general improvement in prose. Much of the original article seemed to be a direct translation and was unclear in places. Rather than add information I have merely attempted to improve the clarity of the original, so I cannot vouch for the source cited. Perhaps the historiography could be improved? --Sickfish (talk) 18:17, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite
Talk:FTX (disambiguation)

message: ----
Ugh, isn't this just marketing speak? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.113.198.67 (talk) 
:Yes it is, this page is not appropriate for Wikipeida:
:* It reads like advertising.
:* It was written by the company in question (run whois on the IP which wrote the article).
:* It lacks notability.
:Speedy delete CSD G11 Codeczero 01:34, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Hole in the Sky (song)

message: *OK.  Since everyone keeps removing the "unreferenced" tag from this article, I re-added and am now listing the parts that need citations.  Please do not remove the tag until these claims either 1) have citations or 2) are reworded in a way to make them less authoritatively correct i.e. you can suggest that some of these things are true without saying they are.
*1. "one of Black Sabbath's most famous songs" 
*2. is considered the first Thrash Metal song. 
*3. The song might refer to the feeling of being High(a state of drug usage where a person has no control of his actions, and is lost in his mind for a specified time period, rather like being drunk); then again, it could also refer to satanic references, assuming the song was written by Geezer Butler. Many thrash metal bands consider this the first "true" thrash metal song. 
*4. this song is one of their most covered songs. 
*5. Surprisingly, this song was not played live until 1992. --Hraefen Talk 15:47, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
Talk:FATE

message: We have 3 possible targets for this redirect (and have used all of them!):
;1. Fate (computer game)
:an article about a single player action role-playing game for the PC
:which is sometimes called "FATE" by its creators.
;2. FATE (role-playing game)
:an article about an innovative metasystem for face-to-face roleplaying games
:where "FATE" is officially an acronym for Fabulous Adventures in Tabletop Entertainment.
;3. Fate
:a disambiguation page
(There's also Fate (disambiguation), which is a redirect to Fate.)
To me, #2 seems to be clearly the best choice, so I've changed the redirect to point there. I'll put an appropriate header link into that article. Cheers, CWC(talk) 15:50, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I already did after I saw that this was now going there. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 16:42, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
Talk:XX (organization)

message: Could not find any SIGCOV from a Google search, and the only source for the article is the comic and game themselves. 2605:B40:1303:900:CAD:8F6F:33AA:50BF (talk) 21:45, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nominated for deletion
Talk:KTVZ

message: Hello, Please do not add unreferenced names as entries to the list of former employees in articles. Including this type of material in articles does not abide by current consensus and its inclusion is strongly discouraged in our policies and guidelines. The rationales are as follows:
#WP:NOT tells us, Wikipedia is "not an indiscriminate collection of information."  As that section describes, just because something is true, doesn't necessarily mean the info belongs in Wikipedia.  
#As per WP:V, we cannot include information in Wikipedia that is not verifiable and sourced. 
# WP:NLIST tells us that lists included within articles (including people's names) are subject to the same need for references as any other information in the article. 
#Per WP:BLP, we have to be especially careful about including un-sourced info about living persons.
If you look at articles about companies in general, you will not find mention of previous employees, except in those cases where the employee was particularly notable.  Even then, the information is not presented just as a list of names, but is incorporated into the text itself (for example, when a company's article talks about the policies a previous CEO had, or when they mention the discovery/invention of a former engineer/researcher). If a preexisting article is already in the encyclopedia for the person you want to add to a list, it's generally regarded as sufficient to support their inclusion in list material in another article.  cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 05:32, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding unreferenced entries of former employees to lists containing BLP material 
Talk:Kurt Tank

message: What does it mean that this WWII German aircraft designer after the war moved to Argentina like many others and continued his career under a new name, "Pedro Matthies"? Was this a sneaky escape, or just a practical matter of convenience? 217.132.5.41
"The Instituto Aerotécnico later became Argentina's military aeroplane factory, the Fabrica Militar de Aviones."
Up to my understanding, both "Instituto Aerotécnico" and "Fabrica Militar de Aviones" refer to the same instirution but in different time frames. Need to research more on this, as online I could not find yet enough evidence to prove this.
When I find such evidence will include it in the "Fabrica Militar de Aviones" article.
DPdH 05:28, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 19:23, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: The word 'Nazi' is conspicuously absent from this article. What was his relationship with the Nazi government? And was he courted by foreign governments after WWII, like Werner von Braun?
What a bizarre article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.71.40.7 (talk) 23:16, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the German language Wikipedia page on Tank, he was an officer in a Freikorps after WWI.  According to the "discussion" page, he joined the Nazi party in 1930.  I don't have sources.  I am relying on Google Translate here.  JHowardGibson (talk) 17:28, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The word 'Nazi' 

message: This article specifically says that Richter intended to power aircraft with nuclear fission, but I've never seen any reference that specifies that's what he was attempting to do during or after the war. Given the nature of the Huemul project, that seems to me to be a hasty assumption. 98.154.22.134 (talk) 01:28, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Richter 

message: The year of retirement OR year of death needs to be corrected.  Currently, the year of retirement is 1985, yet the article reports that he died in 1983  — Preceding unsigned comment added by MatthewTaylor3 (talk • contribs) 02:24, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year of retirement OR year of death needs to be corrected
Talk:Virus Buster Serge

message: Searching for this video game only comes up with this anime. There is currently no known evidence of whether there was actually a video game titled Virus Buster Serge. This article assumes that it was originally a video game. 50.88.13.193 (talk) 01:37, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The game was released only in Japan, so as noted in the article, it was released only as Virus, not Virus Buster Serge. You can find more information about the game at GameFAQs.--Martin IIIa (talk) 16:02, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did Virus Buster Serge really originate as a video game?
Talk:Lupinus albus

message: Key to the subspecies of Lupinus albus L.
1.	Rosettes are formed initially from the leaves, stalks appear at the time of flower-ing. Corolla is dark-blue with a white centrobasal spot at the base of the vexillum. Pods are 60-80 x 11-14 mm, shattering at maturity; seed are 7-10 x 6-8 x 2-3 mm, dark brown, dotted, with impermeable testa. Native to Balkan Peninsula   …………….. …………………………………………………1. Subsp. graecus     
+   Rosette is lacking. 
2.	Plants are shaggy, sericeous. The inflorescence is stretched, crumbly. Flowers are pink or blue. The calyx is with a bract. Found in Egypt, Libya, Sudan, Ethiopia, Israel ……………………………………………………………    2. Subsp. termis
Plants are softly villous. The inflorescence is short, more or less compact. Flowers are grayish, light blue or white. The calyx is without  bract (it falls quickly). Cultivated in the Mediterranean area, in Europe, North and South America, Asia ...
………………………………3. Subsp. albus — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bkurl (talk • contribs) 16:00 4 August 2006 (UTC) 
----
Do we really need all these fanny words in the first frase? --Gruzd 09:05, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:Lupinus luteus

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:04, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Sullivan & Cromwell

message: Nearly all of the text on this page seems to come from  , which is explicitly copyrighted. Unless there is permission this content should be deleted.
Also, this information does not seem to be objective.  Essentially, it is a reprint from the firm's Web page.  Is this permitted under Wikipedia's policies, even apart from the copyright issue?Masteven 22:20, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, this is not permitted under Wikipedia policy, so it should be completely rewritten.  I am deleting it from the article and placing it here if anyone cares to rewrite it.  --Sbrools (talk . contribs) 05:08, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Copyrighted text removed. It was outdated and not usable anyway. GermanJoe (talk) 21:05, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright concern

message: I'm surprised that no one has mentioned the lawsuit filed against Sullivan by Aaron Charney.  Both New York Magazine and New York Observer have done articles on it.  It paints a pretty bleak picture as life as a big firm associate.--Davidwiz 15:54, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discrimination Lawsuit

message: I disagree with the advert tag. --Mike Schiraldi 02:54, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Advert?

message: According to http://news.businessweek.com/article.asp?documentKey=1377-aqHnI6CrAMp0-56PIBAQMOFCTPG4C2TQ1E13916 Sullivan & Cromwell LLP is owed $596,939. Ottawahitech (talk) 15:13, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[MF Global]] bankruptcy 

message: The abandonment section should not be a section in itself. It ought to fall under a different section, like "notable cases" or the like.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.62.227.68 (talk) 02:14, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree, and more. In the course of this firm's very long history, that particular single court case seems unrepresentative. I've boldy deleted mention of it until some editor comes forward with a representative list. —Boruch Baum (talk) 01:16, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abandonment  

message: "alumni"?? I know what an alumnus of a college or university is, but I didn't know you could graduate from a law firm? Please explain this rare use of the term in the article or provide an appropriate wikilink. --BjKa (talk) 10:42, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explain Jargon 

message: Unclear where COI content is located, or where advertising content is located. Original addition of the maintenance template is not discussed on the talk page. Please discuss below if necessary - but there is no justification for a COI template in the article. Andersen Polk (talk) 20:04, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI/Advertisement content
Talk:Great Lakes Intercollegiate Athletic Conference

message: Ed, you are acting unilaterally in your interpretation of policy yet again.  There is no consensus in support of the actions you are taking. You are well aware of the ongoing discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Logos#Clarification_on_use_of_sports_team_logos. Johntex\talk 16:16, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Logo Removal

message: With UW Parkside joining, Wisconsin should also be colored.Naraht (talk) 21:25, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map needs to add Wisconsin...
Talk:Strip steak

message: Strangely, I've seen KC strips here (in KC) that have no bone attached, I'm almost certain of it. I wonder if this is a change of marketing for NY strips locally (which you don't ever see, I don't think), or just a 'sometimes it does, sometimes it doesn't' thing that we need to encompass. Either way, we obviously need more than just my anecdotal opinion before we can say anything further about it... -- nae'blis 16:19, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Both the boneless cut and the much rarer bone-in cut are pretty universally referred to as "New York steak" or "New York strip" here in California. Same thing in Nebraska, where I also spend a lot of time. --MCB 07:11, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: When I lived in Nebraska, a no-bone strip was a New York and a bone-in was a Kansas City strip. That's how Omaha Steaks sells them. 204.69.40.13 15:16, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

message: I would expect the ribs of the animal would be mentioned on the page somewhere but it's missing.  It's obvious to me that the NY Strip steak or roast comes from the area where the ribs are numbered 1-5, since the ribeye comes from ribs 6-12, and the 13th rib (approaching the shoulder) is chuck.  But there's no mention of rib numbers on the page. It would be more clear to the reader if they were mentioned.   Mark The Droner (talk) 13:55, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ribs 

message: This is a Sirloin steak not a porterhouse steak in Britain, a porterhouse steak resembles a T bone but is not a T Bone.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Riveira2 (talk • contribs) 19:07, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, but this statement isn't accurate. It's in the US that a Porterhouse steak is the same as a T-bone, except cut farther back and therefore containing a larger portion of tenderloin. But a traditional UK Porterhouse is in fact a strip steak, with no bone (and, obviously, containing no tenderloin). The traditional UK sense of Porterhouse is also used in Australia and New Zealand. Dcollard (talk) 07:10, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Dcollard is quite correct, and I'm sure that if we look we can find a citation to that effect. And sirloin steaks come from a different primal; this comes from the strip loin. --MCB (talk) 18:35, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The primal cuts are different between the UK and the US, and are very confusing for anyone trying to distinguish between the two. But what is called a strip steak in the US is called a sirloin steak in the UK. (And some day I'm going to try to find the equivalent in the Argentine system!) Dcollard (talk) 00:23, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: British
Talk:Tehanu

message: I'm not sure that the removal of the sentence ("A criticism levelled by a number of readers is that this gender sensibility has exalted polemics over narrative, with the result that the feminist message is heavy-handed and the narrative has suffered.") is justified without some explanation.  It's certainly an opinion that I have heard raised about the book.  I would have left it in and asked for a citation.  If one wasn't forthcoming then remove the sentence. --Perry Middlemiss (talk) 05:46, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's POV/OR without a source. Yes, it could stay in without a source, but personally I think it's better taken out (or perhaps hidden) until a source is found. --Ged UK (talk) 07:49, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gender Issues 

message: "Therru turns out to be much more than she seems." this needs to be expanded, and to give the actual conclusion of the book. Similar hints  in the description about the nature of other people needs expansion also. 
In addition, the interpretation of characters in the analaysis of this and the other EarthSea novels needs to be sourcedDGG (talk) 02:49, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You mean because she's half dragon? It's been a while since I've read it. I'll try to get to it soon, you're right it is teaser-tastic. GedUK  18:31, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't even know about the continuations after the first three till I saw this. Something to look forward to. DGG (talk) 03:19, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: no teasers