Talk:Yadu

message: Add
 "Yadu dynasty
the dynasty in which Lord Krishna
appeared."
:-- 88.72.28.199 (talk) 01:34, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arbitrary heading 

message: User:Joy1963 has given a link in the article claiming Yadu is a tribe. Well, it is in english which calls the tribe Yadus. however, Rigveda was not written in English. Would he give Sanskrit equivalent of Plural "Yadus", and show that it exists in rigveda. Considering Yadu as a tribe is conjectural, which scholars do. However, it is not found in rigveda in the same way. Ikon No-Blast 09:21, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks Joy, I appreciate your knowledge. Ikon No-Blast 19:48, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  You should also see, , the first and later part of rigveda are considered to be creation of later days and are generally considered concoctions, e.g., the purush-sukta. The middle part is considered genuine work. As the author shows, Turvasa is an individual who turns into plural into later part, so might be the case with yadu. Ikon No-Blast 21:30, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yadu person or tribe 

message: jats are indo-scythian tribe which have nothing to with yadavs.yadav is a indo-aryan tribe and chandra vanshi kasahtriya while jats are shudra.
http://www.springerlink.com/content/lw5v58gm16723786/
http://www.springerlink.com/content/k3r48177278105w0/
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6VBF-3SWT27W-4&_user=10&_coverDate=01%2F31%2F1997&_rdoc=1&_fmt=high&_orig=search&_sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_searchStrId=1192748881&_rerunOrigin=scholar.google&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=71d7cfb87d376e6c202037335ed6e417
http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/gb-2005-6-8-p10.pdf  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ancient indian historian (talk • contribs) 01:09, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: jats

message: I have just reverted some additions made to the article by User:Ancient indian historian today. They were cited, but to a medical book and a 1903 source. Neither of these seem to me to be remotely acceptable as reliable sources for the statements being made. If anyone feels otherwise then please could they explain their reasoning here. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 15:14, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  My recent revert 

message: There are several mentions that Ahirs too claim to be descended from Yadu. mahensingha 16:40, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The communities claiming descending Yadu  

message: has been removing sourced content today. They've provided a "sort of" edit summary but the material does appear to include reliable sources. WP:NPOV and WP:VNT might apply. - Sitush (talk) 13:21, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Odd removals 

message: I propose that the page Yadu be split into a two separate pages called Yadu (tribe) and Yadu (legendary king). The content of the current page seems split between talking about the historical Rigvedic Yadu tribe, the legendary king Yadu, the later tribe called the Yadavas, and modern castes claiming to be descendants of Yadu or the Yadavas. There is already a page on the Yadavas.Chariotrider555 (talk) 17:18, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Splitting between historical tribe and legendary person