Wikipedia talk:Nooks and corners of Wikipedia that should be frequented

message: Isn't the standard expression "nooks and crannies?"
—Herbee 20:30, 2004 Mar 1 (UTC)
:Nooks and crannies gets 15 times more Google hits, but both seem to be widely used. Angela. 17:07, Mar 2, 2004 (UTC)
Does anyone mind if I change the order of the sections. I think we ought to get more people frequenting cleanup and peer review, rather than drawing so much attention to VfD, which already gets 20,000 views a month! Angela. 17:07, Mar 2, 2004 (UTC)
:That's a good idea, please do so. -- Arvindn 16:27, 3 Mar 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added the section, but it might need some examples if anyone wants to keep that up to date. Angela. 21:36, Apr 5, 2004 (UTC)
----
Just tidied page titles a bit hope that's ok --(talk to)BozMo 14:05, 21 May 2004 (UTC)

message: I update this page with administrator nominations, but I get the distinct feeling that I'm wasting my time. It's only been edited 27 times by three editors in the last month; ten of those edits were by me and one of those editors is me. One of the three pages listed as being on cleanup is no longer on cleanup. The featured article candidate is now just a featured article, and the featured picture candidate will follow suit in a couple days. The item on VFD has been deleted. None of the rest of the links are unique to this page.
If you regularly read this page, please say so. Otherwise, I'm going to mothball it. I'll wait a week for objections, then orphan it; wait a week again, then VFD it. --Ben Brockert < 05:01, Dec 29, 2004 (UTC)
*I don't think it should be deleted; there need to be pages for the wikipedia community like this -- just look how the PCUSA page has improved to to its listing here. Perhaps this page could list some wikipedia tasks that are especially needed for which there are presently few voluenteers. Writing articles is great, but doing boring cleanup like moving little stubs to the wiktionary or translation is important too.Zantastik 10:36, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delete this page? 

message: Quite outdated. How nice if it could be automatically updated to show the current candidates for quick reference while visiting WP:NAC. º0º  hydnjo talk 17:40, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:RFA]] Headline Candidates

message: Updated on 6 June 2005  hydnjo talk 00:22, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:RFA]] Candidates

message: Thank you AllyUnion for putting this on VFD Bot's to do list. Until then I'll update manually.
I'm thinking that if this page were to be up to date it would be used more frequently for a quick look around (or is it just me).  hydnjo talk 02:53, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: VFD Bot reported for duty today.  hydnjo talk 11:58, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:VFD]] Updates

message: Because this page is so poorly updated, other than by the VFD Bot, I'm proposing to merge it with Wikipedia:Goings-on, where things like collaborations and new featured articles/pictures are maintained, because that page is kept more current. --Michael Snow 20:45, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: OK with me. WP:VFD is being updated daily by VFD Bot (Thanks to AllyUnion) but WP:RFA candidates is being kept current (sort of) manually. A WP:FAC link would also be helpful. And of course Wikipedia:Goings-on should be easy to find by a newbie (and oldie); say, on the Wikipedia:Community Portal front page.  hydnjo talk 21:11, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge