Talk:Ancient South Arabian script

message: On the right of some of the letters (e.g. , 
) i see squares (ḥ) instead of the corresponding trasliterations. But the transliterations on the right of other letters (e.g. ,
) seem fine. What's the solution? Itayb 11:35, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  squares rather than transliteration on the right of some of the letters 

message: There is a difference between language and script/alphabet. For example, when I write the Arabic word "salam", I am using English script to write Arabic language. What we currently call "Arabic alphabet" was actually the Nabataean alphabet in the 7th century CE. 
So the following statement should be changed from:
Its mature form was reached around 500 BC, and its use continued until the 7th century AD, including Old North Arabian inscriptions in variants of the alphabet, when it was displaced by the Arabic alphabet.
to:
Its mature form was reached around 500 BC, and its use continued until the 7th century AD, including Old North Arabian inscriptions in variants of the alphabet, when it was displaced by the Nabataean alphabet.
For more information, please see:
MCA Macdonald, "Reflections on the linguistic map of pre-Islamic Arabia." Arabian arch. epig. 2000: 11: 28–79.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.67.148.180 (talk) 21:16, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: but that is extremely inaccurate.  Although the Arabic alphabet originated from Nabataean alphabet, it is nonetheless extremely different.  The one that spread during the 7th Century AD is the Arabic alphabet; during this time writing in Arabia became very widespread so there is a lot of evidence available.  During that time Islam spread over the entire area and so did the Arabic language and its alphabet.  This claim is bizarre.  --Maha Odeh (talk) 12:35, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arabic Alphabet 

message: In "Safaitic" language article this quote is given:
"the The Safaitic alphabet comprises 28 letters. Three abecedaries (lists of the alphabet) are known, but all are written in different orders, giving strength to the suggestion that the script was casually learned rather than taught systematically."
Which must refer to this, the South Arabian Script.
Could anyone please supply Wikipedia with these alternate abecedaria if they are easily at-hand?  It'll take me some time to find them myself.
Wikipedia User Epigraphist
35.8.141.108 (talk) 19:51, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Query for Abecedaria

message: I'm no linguist, but this alphabet has no vowels, so I'm adding that. I assume they're Mater lectionis ? --AW (talk) 20:45, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  No vowels 

message: What purpose does the "shape" column in the table serve? Doesn't seem scientific or useful, just like someone said "oh, these are what latin letters the arabian letters KINDA look like". but that's not even remotely necessary because we have both unicode and image representations of the letters 128.237.133.65 (talk) 03:47, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Shape" column 

message: Hi, I find it hard to believe that the earliest South Arabian script is from 2000 BC, I know this information is with sources but I tried to find the book mentioned in the pdf "Die archäologischen Denkmäler von Raybūn im unteren Wādī Dauʿan (Ḥaḍramaut). Mare Erythraeum" but I couldn't find it in google, most websites says that the South Arabian script was used from the 8th century BCE until 6th century CE, someone needs to find the reference mentioned in the pdf --Eddiitt0 (talk) 10:28, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  2000 BC ?