lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Recovery Console

message: Removed from the article:
(However, they are not identical.  The normal Windows commands are Win32 programs, which are incapable of running in the environment that the Recovery Console executes in, where no Win32 subsystem is present.)
Some are built-in in the command processor and don't exist as separate Win32 programs. This situation is inherited from DOS, which also differentiated between built-in and external commands. On older systems, where you only had just one floppy drive, you could boot from the DOS bootdisk and then after inserting a different disk, e.g. containing your documents or a game, you could still use all the built-in commands. The external commands however, where unavailable unless you were prepared to sacrifice some RAM for a RAM-disk and copy the external commands there on boot. Shinobu (talk) 06:01, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not all Windows commands are Win32 programs... 

message: Netsh wlan show profile name=HARI WIFI 2409:40E0:54:A904:DC56:CAFF:FE07:1D6A (talk) 20:12, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  HARIWIFI
Talk:.sys

message: The term SYS redirects here and there is currently no page for sys- doesn't sys (like import sys in computing languages) deserve to be mentioned? --BiT (talk) 20:57, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: For the term <tt>sys</tt>
Talk:Booting process of Windows

message: I recommend merging Windows Vista startup process into this article.  There is no longer a need to have them separate.  -- Dave Braunschweig (talk) 17:47, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps Windows Vista startup process could be merged into Windows NT startup process, but not into the parent article Windows startup process, which discusses (and should continue to discuss) all versions of Windows, including the DOS-based ones. However, there is so much more that could be included into these articles that I would rather keep them separate. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 18:14, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

text: Oppose The Windows NT 6.x is quite different to the Windows NT 5.x and Windows startup process should summarize the key differences between them and older Windows releases. I'm also closing the merge proposal due to silence. --M4t3uz (talk) 22:38, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: Shouldn't this be mentioned somewhere? I came here looking for it because I couldn't remember the name and was certain that WikiPedia would refresh my memory ... but it's not here.
.
PcGnome (talk) 05:20, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  msconfig
Talk:Windows File Protection

message: I've created a rewrite of the infringing section available here.   While the other sections do not appear to be infringing, it may not be viable as a review of the history will show that the section in question has been present since this article was created.  akuyumeTC 06:05, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've continued to write a complete and total rewrite from scratch of the article with multiple references still available as a subpage of this talk page at Talk:Windows File Protection/Temp.  akuyumeTC 02:45, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Temporary rewrite
Talk:Microsoft ScanDisk

message: There's no more Scandisk in Windows XP, last I checked. Probably true for 2000 and Vista as well.
So this sentence is misleading: "The disk scanning utility under Windows NT, Windows 2000 and Windows XP is also called CHKDSK", because it suggests that Scandisk is still around, together with Chkdsk, on these Windows versions. Resurgent insurgent 03:27, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not ScanDisk, it's Error checking. Error checking in XP is CHKDSK. PCHS-NJROTC (Messages) 03:21, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scandisk in Windows 2000/XP/Vista
Talk:Archive bit

message: Unlike what the article states, when I move a folder on Windows 7 Ultimate, and that folder contains a file that has its archive bit cleared, then the archive bit of that file is NOT set.
# Create a folder
# Create a file in the folder
# Clear the archive bit of the file
# Move the folder to another location
# Check the file's archive bit: It is still cleared  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.241.91.114 (talk) 08:17, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: That would most certainly be because the file itself is not moved. It is the directory that moves, but the file still remains in that directory, so the archive bit is not modified. This only holds as long as the move takes place within the same filesystem, of course. If you move the directory to another filesystem, the archive bit will be set as expected. --JITR (talk) 07:41, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Moving a file does not necessarily set archive bit
Talk:Emin Fuat Keyman

message: do we have a birthday for this person?  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.235.9.15 (talk) 01:08, August 23, 2007 (UTC) 
:He must be born in 1958 if he was 18 when he entered ODTÜ in 1976. This is the most logical answer. Deliogul 09:57, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  birthday 
Category talk:Channelled entities

message: Should this category also include channelled entities that current living people claim to channel? There are some entries that are claimed to be channelled by currently living people, like Ramtha. Also, David Wilcock claims to channel Ra and Paul Shockley (now at User:Eep²/Paul Shockley due to a speedy delete nomination which I never even knew about until after it was deleted) and others claim(ed)--Shockley is dead) to channel Cosmic Awareness. -Eep² 05:40, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Microsoft Point-to-Point Encryption

message: It would be nice if someone wrote an overview of how well do SOHO routers implement MPPE and MPPC. It looks like most hardware ignore encryption and compression, which results in sending user's traffic “in plain text”, while the user keeps thinking he/she is using a safe VPN tunnel between his/her router and ISP equipment. 213.234.235.82 (talk) 13:28, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  MPPE/MPPC and home routers
Talk:DirectMusic

message: I'm wondering if DirectMusic is patented... is there anything that would stop somebody from making an open-source library that played DirectMusic files? - furrykef (Talk at me) 20:20, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like Patent #5,753,843 might indeed cover DirectMusic... - furrykef (Talk at me) 20:36, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is it patented? 

message: My last edit on this page was a simple grammar fix, but was rolled back by Sladen and marked as vandalism!  I am now reverting to my original edit.  Sladen, please give a reason for your rollbacks, especially if you are going to label them as vandalism.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tolkien fan (talk • contribs) 20:17, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm just making a note here for the record: there was no such edit by Sladen. Tolkien fan actually reverted his(?) own edit by mistake to a previous version by Sladen (but he since realized this). - furrykef (Talk at me) 02:48, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  My edit considered vandalism? 

message: It seems Microsoft removed all DirectMusic-related downloads (DirectMusic Producer, demo projects, etc). Should it be added to article? 176.212.22.82 (talk) 15:37, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead links 

message: The article actually starts by saying that DirectMusic is deprecated, but no mention whatsoever is made of the replacement technology. It seems very hard to find this type of info on the internet, so... anyone? 87.142.102.66 (talk) 21:05, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deprecation
Talk:File association

message: (N chawlain 08:33, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Open with 

message: Does it mean that file associations only exist under Microsoft Windows?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.20.211.215 (talk) 16:28, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: File associations exist in other OS other than Windows, but, these OS have more complex methods and techinques related to file associations, and are hard to understand. The inforrmation released  publiclyabout the other OS including Linux, are very vague and cannot be understood easily.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.88.141.36 (talk) 17:25, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about the other OS's? 

message: I recall WINFILE.EXE would open a file with the correct program based on file extensions.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.191.28.156 (talk) 19:35, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: You are right, the article is incorrect. Windows 3.x introduced the Windows Registry specifically for file association reasons. I'll see if I can patch this up. --DanielPharos (talk) 11:36, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pre Windows 95 also had file name based extensions 

message: This action is mentioned several times but not defined or described.  Seems to me, it should be, in a linked article if not in this one.  Jim.henderson (talk) 18:19, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps something like, "invokes the associated program, which reads the file or document and presents it to the user for viewing, and possibly for editing or other action." Jim.henderson (talk) 12:32, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening a file 

message: I've been associating file extensions for decades, and never heard of verbs. That section is no help. Modern open programs typically have edit, print, etc, —if available,— as menu or button choices. Are we talking about Command Line Arguments?...Do they belong here? That section should be clarified or deleted. <BR> --2602:306:CFCE:1EE0:404:3F01:219D:4CA2 (talk) 11:55, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Associations and verbs" section ?? 

message: For example in the MS-Win section, the very last sentence is "The ability to configure advanced file association functionality, however, was removed in Windows Vista and later operating systems."   WTF!!!   That info should be at the start so most people can skip it.  Also "This is true" should be changed to "This was true," etc. How much in this article is now history/obsolete? <BR> --2602:306:CFCE:1EE0:404:3F01:219D:4CA2 (talk) 12:20, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Obsolete info
Talk:Network Load Balancing Services

message: This article is out of date. It does not cover Windows Sever 2008, 2008 R2 or 2012. 86.169.208.154 (talk) 19:34, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  out of date 
Talk:Microsoft Active Accessibility

message: The statement in the limitations section about split buttons is inaccurate.  Split buttons were well known at the time, having been part of Office 95.  The design of MSAA was not to have a specific-role for every possible type of UI element, but to accommodate complex elements by breaking down complex elements into simpler ones.  
A traditional split button UI control would have two sections - one with text and possibly an icon.  Next to that would be a icon of a down arrow or similar.  Activating the textual portion would perform the default action of the button.  Activating the down arrow portion would activate a drop down menu.
Thus, an implementation of a split button control could expose two MSAA objects, either both with a accRole of ROLE_SYSTEM_PUSHBUTTON, or just the text/icon portion would be a ROLE_SYSTEM_PUSHBUTTON.  Then the down arrow portion would be exposed as a ROLE_SYSTEM_BUTTONMENU.
The fact that the default implementation of MSAA doesn't expose a split button is not a reflection of any design limitation.  Charles Oppermann (talk) 16:39, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Limitations
Talk:List of North Queensland Cowboys players

message: The source here clearly lists the captain of the inaugural game as player #1. I realise that's not alphabetical, but it is the club's decision how they order the players. Other clubs use a completely different method. Please discuss here before reverting. Doctorhawkes (talk) 21:07, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Player order
Talk:Windows Imaging Format

message: I'm trying to understand the statement about file-based image being hardware independent comparing to block based. It really puzzled me. --Mrd000 (talk) 18:56, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe you should read/get more familiar with this topic. See this article on Wikipedia or this external one for example. Wget (talk) 10:12, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hardware Independence
Talk:System Locked Pre-installation

message: Since Microsoft now uses the term "OEM Activation" instead of "System Locked Preinstallation", I think that this article should be renamed and a redirect created.--216.254.123.206 (talk) 00:13, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renaming article 

message: The keys are not copyrighted (they are a fact), and they aren't DMCA circumvention devices. There is no copyright violation here per Talk:Volume license key. 68.173.145.85 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 17:09, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  copyvio 

message: I can verify all of the information mentioned in the article through personal experience.  In addition, I would like to comment that Microsoft still refers to this method as SLP which is evident in the Windows 7 licencing verification method.  This can be viewable by software designed to verify product keys using pidgen.dll and other internal Windows files. Kamron Batman (talk) 09:13, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personal Experience
Talk:Loyola University Chicago Expansion Plan

message: The page about the expansion  should be included in shortened form in the main article  DGG ( talk ) 20:15, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: +1, shortened & referenced & merged Hugh (talk) 21:41, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Loyola University Chicago]]
Talk:ActiveMovie

message: This entry is pretty dull. What factors (intenral and external) made MS change the name and bundle it with DirectX?  What market forces were driving development?  Why is ActiveMovie no longs a current product? --24.249.108.133 20:47, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: JFTR, in 2011 that was again suggested, but there was an objection. –82.113.98.214 (talk) 00:13, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical context 
Talk:Windows DVD Maker

message: why isnt there diffrences betwean movie maker?Mariofan1000 08:38, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Because they're two unrelated applications...would be like comparing PhotoShop to Battlefield 2142.  Movie Maker creates a movie file from audio/video files you select, and DVD Maker actually lets you burn files to DVD with menu screens and all.  But neither needs the other application to function. 162.136.192.1 (talk) 21:18, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  compisition to movie maker 

message: Wouldn't it be better to have a screenshot that shows some of the functionality rather than just the welcome page?
suck it  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.15.120.57 (talk) 18:08, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: possibly, but such things are plagued with copyrighht issues.  The screen shot included is copyright, but has been used in the article with Microsoft's permission. 109.153.242.10 (talk) 15:50, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Screenshot

message: Is there any guide or Handbook/Help for the software? 2003:D6:2F23:1B3E:AD8F:D4D5:8BB4:C991 (talk) 19:28, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Windows DVD Maker
Talk:Quick View

message: Still miss it in newer versions... Empaler 23:10, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wonderful tool 
Talk:St. Joseph College Seminary (Illinois)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) 2pou (talk) 19:30, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: St. Joseph College Seminary (Illinois) →  – Revert unnecessary addition of parenthetical disambiguation. Elizium23 (talk) 14:16, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 29 December 2022
Talk:Sisters of Charity of the Blessed Virgin Mary

message: Hi  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.96.138.180 (talk) 14:36, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  BVM Schoo Pollachi 
Talk:Adam Carrington

message: I thought it was his brother Steven who was gay not Adam so why is he included in the categories for fictional gay men and fictional bisexuals? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Penrithguy (talk • contribs) 16:07, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Haha, my mistake, I used the Steven article as a template for this one and neglected to delete those categories. I've made the fix, thanks for noticing. TAnthony 20:18, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Gay & Bisexual categories
Talk:LOGO.SYS

message: Hello, as I noted in the title this bitmap is still present in Kernel Image Executable (NTOSKRNL.EXE and similar), so it is probably still used if there is failure in ACPI on newer Windows, also XP (and below) doesn't need ACPI compliant system, so it is possible to see this message on old systems as well.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.159.131.54 (talk) 21:49, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  This message bitmap is still present in NTOSKRNL.EXE 

message: I've used Windows 98 and made my own LOGO.SYS files, all uncompressed (no RLE). And they all work fine, despite being over 125KB and despite what this article says, so, I feel like either a correction or a citation is needed for the claim that a plain, non-RLE encoded BMP would have been "entirely too large" RetroFanboy990 (talk) 05:27, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  LOGO.SYS Size limit?
Talk:Windows Ultimate Extras

message: Unless there's been yet another recent release of Ultimate Extras, I believe the sound schemes and Dream Scene content pack 3 were released on or about April 22, not May 1 as stated in the article. The release roughly coincided with RTM of XP SP3. 142.103.207.10 (talk) 20:27, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release date for newest Extras? 

message: If anyone knows of any predicted future Ultimate Extras, I think that would be a great section to add. --Sauronjim (talk) 17:52, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Future Releases
Talk:Victoria Philharmonic Choir

message: Victoria is an important cultural centre not only within canada but in North America. This choir is worthy of note because it brings professionalism and some times controversial new relevance to its works. An example has been the international debate that was initiated by the setting of Samson oratoria in 1964 in modern palestine. The aim was bring serious discussion to the reasons behind terrorism. Articles pro and con appeared in National and International media. The current page is a stub that will in time include details of that controversy.
see
http://news.google.com/news?client=safari&rls=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&um=1&tab=wn&q=samson+victoria+philharmonic&btnG=Search+News
:Allight, that seems good.  Put that in the article, and preferably remove the current scheduling (not only is it tacky, but it's also dated-- not a good thing for a permanent encyclopedia).  Wikipedia is not a current event calendar.  Those should be good enough to remove the CSD.  Happy editing!  Coren 05:33, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Victoria 

message: See?  That wasn't so painful.  It's more work that way, but you save yourself a lot of stress if you plan and write a slightly more fleshed out article in the first place, thus completely bypassing the stress of a deletion request.  Happy editing!  Coren 05:46, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  No longer CSD 

message: * "Controversial concert disturbing, musically affecting"
Sarah Petrescu, Times Colonist
Published: Friday, April 06, 2007
* "ARTISTIC INTOLERANCE"
JOHN THRELFALL, Monday Magazine
Apr 11 2007 
Dhadams (talk) 18:32, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Refs to check
Talk:Run command

message: Where is run actually located? Is it somewhere in system32? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Coolkid602006 (talk • contribs) 18:53, 1 August 2007
: I think it's built-in to Explorer (or Program Manager, File Manager or MS-DOS Executive). Josh 18:30, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

message: I am confused as to why an article that claims to be on a Windows feature has a screenshot from Linux? Obviously, a Linux screenshot is "free", while a Windows screenshot is copyrighted; however, the other screenshot on the page is from Windows. Either the Windows "Run" command should be pictured, or the article should say it is a feature of Linux (at least GNOME) also. LlwynogCymru (talk) 00:48, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why the Linux screenshot? 

message: Add this as an external link?: http://pcsupport.about.com/od/commandlinereference/a/run-commands-windows-7.htm  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mike783m (talk • contribs) 21:05, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Much Better List Here 

message: I use the run window a lot. A whole lot. I find it irritating that there's a lot of functionality in it that I can not seem to execute via command form the command prompt. I also can't find a solution for this anywhere online. The closest thing I can find is the START command from the command prompt but it's still hardly the same. And definitely not the same format.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.99.58.124 (talk) 17:48, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add more please. I use this a lot. Plus some criticism
Talk:BackgroundWorker

message: I believe this is thoroughly unworthy of its own article. It should be incorporated into a simple list of controls on the Windows Forms article. I posted the same remark for the RichTextBox article. --David Gannon (talk) 05:20, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not notable? 

message: I have removed the WikiProject tag, as this article is either a redirect or deleted. If you oppose, please restore the tag. Thank you, fahadsadah (talk,contribs) 16:13, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikiproject Computing
Talk:AppLocale

message: I just installed this perfectly fine on Windows 7 from the official microsoft download page.--86.4.244.181 (talk) 17:38, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Windows 7 

message: Article claims App locale creates a shortcut, which is the 4th Window for application setup. Going from my own computer, this seems to be placed at:
C:\Users\*User*\AppData\Roaming\Microsoft\Windows\Start Menu\Programs\Microsoft AppLocale I didn't even know AppLocale actually had a start menu folder! Unifoe (talk) 00:45, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Applocale shortcut? 
Talk:Night of the Living Plush / I Love Neddy

message: Someone was animated into this episode for a Make a Wish... Er... Wish.  I don't have the time to dedicate into inserting this into the article with any quality right now, so anyone that wants to could probably drop it in.  --Oracle of Wuffing 05:20, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Make a Wish