lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ramesses V

message: There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Ramesses - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 08:40, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: "the mummy of Ramesses V was recovered in 1898 and seemed to indicate that he suffered and subsequently died from smallpox, due to lesions found on his face. He was thought to be one of the earliest known victims of the disease." perhaps you might want to break the paragraph here 
"While a 2016 discovery has found that the shared ancestral form of smallpox dates back to 1580 AD,etc etc" otherwise it would suggest that the study was related to ramses's smallpox.
and can you elucidate the suggestion that his mummy indicated that he "subsequently died from smallpox"? did y'all find a death certificate? 70.31.166.89 (talk) 23:17, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  dates?
Talk:Ramesses IV

message: Please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ancient Egypt#Ramses/Rameses/Ramesses. –Hajor 18:07, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for comments: Ramses/Rameses/Ramesses

message: This article does not distinguish between the monuments and inscriptions of the two prenomens supposedly used by Ramesses IV. This is a great shame because the assumption that Ramesses IV was first crowned as Usermaatre and then changed his prenomen to Hekamaatre in his second regnal year is not proven. In fact there is clear evidence that the two prenomina represent two distinct kings who have been amalgamated incorrectly in the past decades of Egyptology when the evidence we have today was not available ... not least the fact that regnal dates Year 1 and 2 are attested for both prenomina (i.e. there is no changeover in Year 2 but rather Years 1 and 2 for both kings).  Therefore, when inscriptions are quoted in this article, they should contain the prenomen that appears in the text and not simply the artificial label 'IV' which fails to distinguish between Hekamaatre and Usermaatre. For example, it is Usermaatre who was responsible for the Great Papyrus Harris and Hekamaatre who recorded the Great Stela in the Wadi Hammamat.David Rohl (talk) 15:06, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Ramesses IV had a triple (as opposed to the more common double) praenomen: Usermaatre Heqamaatre Setepenamun. I have edited the very start of the page to show the "Usermaatre" part. 2A00:23C7:5882:8201:95C7:89D4:717:5483 (talk) 20:10, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hekamaatre Ramesses (IV) or Usermaatre Ramesses (IV)?? 

message: There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Ramesses - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 04:40, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:The Chalfonts

message: We should have articles on Little Chalfont and Chalfont St Petrer and delete this one, SqueakBox 18:12, Jun 26, 2005 (UTC)
Can anyone tell which manorial rolls are referred to, are they the Missenden Abbey Manor of Chalfont St Peter and more specifically what is the source for the name Chalfund Parva. I have never come across it before.--Jdod 20:25, 24 July 2005 (UTC)

message: Right here goes.  We separate various parts of this article off into Little Chalfont, Chalfont St Peter and the existing Chalfont St Giles article respectively, then redirect The Chalfonts page to Chalfont, and further disambig the links there.  Easy?  Desirable? -- Francs2000 | Talk  18:41, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: There is already a disambig page at Chalfont, so I think a redirect is simpler. -- Francs2000 | Talk  18:52, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It is done, though I don't know which famous person lives or lived in which village, so I left that bit out.  Also the disputed origins have been left in, feel free to edit those if your sources are more reliable than mine. -- Francs2000 | Talk  19:08, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plan
Talk:Sidestroke

message: This article doesn't actually get to describe the arm and leg movements in side stroke.  I read it, wanting to check whether the way I swim this stroke was correct - but it shed no light at all.  The article would be improved if some person who knows this information could please add it.  Thank you. M.J.E. (talk) 10:59, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stroke not actually described.
Template talk:Administrative divisions of Taiwan navbar

message: We are talking about the counties of Taiwan, official name of Penghu in taiwan is Penghu.. Gumuhua (talk) 18:50, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: True. We shall use only the official designation. Chongkian (talk) 02:55, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Y ppl keep adding un-official designations? 

message: The Provincial cities shouldn't be a whole category under the ROC administration.  Provincial cities are not cities at the Provincial level, they're cities at the county level, meaning they're 2nd level divisions, thus should be placed as a subcategory of the Taiwan Province.  Under Taiwan Province, it should be split into 2 subcategories of "Counties" and "Provincial Cities".  Liu Tao (talk) 21:26, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Provincial Cities
Talk:Monomethylhydrazine

message: In this exerpt from a statement in the article: "...engines of the NASA "Space Shuttle" or STS", the term "STS" does not, in fact, refer to the Space Shuttle specifically, rather the entire assembly (external fuel tank and solid rocket boosters along with the Space Shuttle itself).  The acronym STS means "Shuttle Transport System."  Picky, I know, but in the interest of good information, I'll make the change.75.112.129.242 12:39, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Just an FYI

message: Is it "monomethylhydrazine" or "monomethyl hydrazine"?
:Either one of these will work fine and will be well understood. Sometimes in English, it is rather amazing that one word or phrase has two equally-good spellings, such as in "judgment" or "judgement"; or as some people write, "sports car" or "sportscar", though I dislike the second of these.98.67.99.40 (talk) 04:05, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It should be written close up, as "monomethylhydrazine". The second option, "monomethyl hydrazine", is understandable, but incorrect by the rules of chemical nomenclature. To be technical, the name is substitutive nomenclature (always written close up), not radicofunctional nomenclature (written with spaces between the terms in English): I don't think this compound can be namened in radicofunctional nomenclature. Physchim62 (talk) 09:11, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Standardized Spelling 

message: I added a reference and link to the military specification for MMH.  Bosef1 (talk) 03:34, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mil-spec reference 
Talk:Kimberly Williams-Paisley

message: In the credits of Porco Rosso she is credited as Kimberly Williams-Paisley, which means the subtitling must have happened after her marriage. While the movie was originally released in Japan in 1992, the English subtitles was done in 2005. I am not sure if it is worth changing the 1992 to 2005 for this, so I am placing this note in the talk section.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.204.221.221 (talk) 22:00, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Porco Rosso

message: The article starts with:
"née Williams; born September 14, 1971".
To avoid weighing down the phrase with this pleonasm, I suggest to replace it with:
either "born Williams on September 14, 1971",
or "née Williams on September 14, 1971".
"born" and "née" being both world-wide known nowadays, either will do. However I feel "née" as having no advantage other than looking savvy in the eyes of some people by unnecessarily importing foreigner words, especially when weighed down with characters altered by diacritics, while "born" is at least as universal, and more resilient (these more general questions better addressed later and elsewhere).
Versailles, Mon 14 Nov 2022 17:25:50 +0100 Michel Merlin (talk) 16:25, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  née or born, NOT both
Talk:Setsuko Hara

message: The heading says "Final years". Did she die? Wistchars (talk) 04:31, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Final years"? 
Talk:Eating Raoul

message: I thought they ended up serving the money to James, the real estate broker? If they had an investor, they wouldn't have needed to kill people for money, would they? Ckamaeleon 17:58, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Investor? 
MediaWiki talk:Randompage

message: What algorithm selects the random article?  Is it truly random? Brownturkey (talk) 13:22, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It should select a random page from a select list, I would guess it would be rather difficult for the system to pick an article out of the millions that are on Wikipedia, but this is only my guess. -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs  12:13, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Algorithm?
Talk:Rick Mercer Report

message: "popularised" or "popularized"?  Which english spelling is preferred on Wiki, the Canadian or American spelling.  I'd reason that since this is a Canadian focused entry, it makes sense to use the Canadian spelling of the word. --Computer_Saskboy 19:04, Jun 26, 2005 (UTC)
Wikipedia doesn't mandate the use of either regular or U.S. English, but I certainly see no reason for an article about a Canadian subject to use U.S. spellings. David Arthur 20:47, Jun 26, 2005 (UTC)
Standardly it is whichever is there gets to be there, though for topics that are about an area it is normally their spelling. As far as I see.
:Yes, the normal policy is basically If the article is relevent to one specific country, use their english.  If not, retain whatever english it is currently using.  But always be consistant and use a single version.  An article about a Canadian TV show should use Canadian English.WilyD 15:57, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling 

message: That part of the article should be cut.  It's very opinionated and seems out of context.
On the other side, there should be some mention of Darren Jones' brief run on the show (when it was still called Monday Report).  I know we all hated him, but he's still part of the show's history, like it or not. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 76.64.76.107 (talk) 16:01, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This video right here shows a good example of a memorable moment. - Presidentman 22:51, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Favourite Moments...?
Talk:Bad taste

message: Shouldn't this be a disambiguation page? I'm not proposing a move so much as I'm just confused. It is formatted much like a disambiguation page; it serves the same purpose as a disambiguation page; but it doesn't have "disambiguation" in parentheses after the main title. Why? Birdsinthewindow (talk) 03:08, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambig?
Talk:Magdala

message: I've had to protect this article against vandalism.  If those who insisted on replacing it with an article on their band would contact me, we might be able to sort something out. Mel Etitis  (Μελ Ετητης) 19:19, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  Are you the one who wrote that paragraph (on 1st November 2014)?  Can you please explain who on God's green Earth was "Titus b. Vespasian"?  Is it Titus Flavius Vespasianus, the later Emperor who fought the Judaean War?  If so, what is that "b." supposed to mean?  It cannot possibly be the Jewish patronymic "ben/bar", since Vespasian was neither Jewish nor his father was called Vespasian — he was called T. Flavius Sabinus.  Please clarify and hyperlink your explanation. --Wtrmute (talk) 00:28, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled

message: :I've made the link.  The site is less cautious than modern scholars would be, but within the terms of the standard traditions about Magdala it is certainly very informative.  seglea 22:12, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Magdala photos & review 

message: This is very dubious that the article is not specific - if there were 2 Magdala's, then we need two articles.GreyShark (dibra) 13:33, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Identification
Talk:♯P-complete

message: Just in case anyone's wondering why a poly-time algorithm for a #P-complete problem implies P=NP, it follows from Toda's theorem. We know P#P contains PH, so if the P machine can simulate #P oracle queries in poly time, it can solve all of PH in P. Deco 19:29, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Implies P=NP 

message: Are there any problems X in NP-complete for which #X are not (believed to be) #P-complete? -- Myria 06:37, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NP-complete problem corresponding to non-#P-complete problem? 

message: The sentence "A problem is #P-complete if and only if it is in #P, and every problem in #P can be reduced to it in logarithmic space" is incorrect. The problem 2SAT, as well as #Positive 2SAT, counting the number of satisfying truth assignments for all and positive Krom (2-satisfiability) formulas is #P-complete. However, there is no known logspace reduction from #3SAT to #2SAT, otherwise we would have the same reduction also for the decision problems from 3SAT to 2SAT, what implies P=NP. Hence, I changed the sentence to counting reductions, i.e., Turing reduction relating the cardinality of solutions.--Miki Hermann 15:49, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reduction 

message: Perhaps contributors to this article can also contribute to the discussion of whether the article titled "Permanent is sharp-P-complete" should be deleted.  See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Permanent is sharp-P-complete. Michael Hardy (talk) 12:58, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed deletion of "Permanent is sharp-P-complete" 

message: It looks like the title is currently "Sharp-P-complete" because of the technical restriction disallowing use of the pound sign in title text. I would suggest using the "sharp" symbol ♯ instead, which is allowed in title text. 128.104.3.101 (talk) 20:06, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Special symbol in title
Talk:Da capo aria

message: I would very much like to see a section devoted to a discussion of the key relationships between the A and B sections of a da capo aria. What key changes are conventional, likely, or permissible between the A and B sections? How do these conventions change over time (from one period to another)? Are there any notable exceptions to any conventions or rules, with a list of unusual arias perhaps.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bandekafsh (talk • contribs) 11:54, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Key relationships
Talk:Centre Pompidou

message: I was writing a school paper when I came across this page:
http://www.custom-essay-writing.com/2010/02/architecture-in-france/
It has a ton of information in extreme detail about the history and construction of the pompidou, I think the essay could really help with the article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.96.236.177 (talk) 15:41, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: I think this could help with the article

message: There's a mistake in the quotation from the newspaper.  The color for air pipes is blue (and white), and green for water pipes -- not blue for water pipes and green for air.  This is confirmed on the web site of the centre:
Colour-coded ducts are attached to the outside of the building: blue for air; green for fluids; yellow for electricity cables; and red for movement and flow (elevators) and safety (fire extinguishers). - www.centrepompidou.fr , English page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jfclemay (talk • contribs) 18:40, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colors 

message: Centre Pompidou of Málaga. 
Someone could help? --Maximo88 (talk) 17:12, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please, we need a translation Centro Pompidou de Málaga
Talk:Ghazel

message: Ghazal is usually used to refer to a Persian and Urdu poetic tradition (Urdu being closely related to Persian and Hindi). As I understand it, it is an Indo-Aryan tradition, not Semetic. And it is not neccessarily love poetry. The article begins by stating that "The ghazal (also spelled ghazel or ghazl) is lyric love poetry dating back to the 7th Century in Arabia."  I really do not see any relation to 7th century Arabia. 7th century Arabia seems to coincide with the origins of Islam, but I dont understand what it has to do with ghazal (which is frequently about drinking alcohol). The "7th century Arabia" claim seems factually incorrect to me. --Zeno of Elea 09:01, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I am pretty sure that Ghazal is the better article and... as we know from Sufis talk of alcohol is not outside the pale of Islam. gren グレン 09:33, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  Sufis incorporated talk of intoxication into [[Qawwali] in a METAPHORICAL sense, not in a literal sense. --Zeno of Elea 12:59, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origins?
Talk:Blues Music Awards

message: This article should be moved to "W. C. Handy Award" to comlpy with the standard set out by such awards as The Academy Award, The Gemini Award, The Juno Award, and The Grammy Award. --Zippanova 19:55, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I agree. I wonder if there was any reason for keeping the old name. Can anybody shed a light on this if there have been any reasons? If not, I will move this article to "Blues Music Award". Thanks. --Sumori 04:26, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The move is done. I also rewrote the article to fit the new title. Thanks. --Sumori 15:12, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: name

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. WP:CONSISTENT (closed by non-admin page mover) ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 17:28, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Blues Music Award →  – Misspelled — missing an "s" at the end of "Award"... Pillowdelight (talk) 23:12, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

text: The name was not "misspelled." You can see from the log below that the "s" was dropped from the article title to be in consistent with other award article such as Grammy and Academy which all used "Award" as the title at the time. It seems those articles have all been renamed, and I don't see any reasons this article should not do the same.Sumori (talk) 00:48, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thank you so much. Pillowdelight (talk) 09:49, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 6 April 2024
Talk:Franciscan Order in modern times

message: The  is only a guess, but the statistics are from 1910. Peter Grey 20:08, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

message: I have removed the redirection from "Bernardines" to this page. I have done this on the grounds that Bernardine is far more commonly usually used as an expression for the Order of Cistercians- see that article see reference to this. The redirection therefore gives significant cause for confusion.
The only reference to Bernardines I could find in this article as it stood was "In Poland the order is also known as the Bernardines."
I cannot really verify the truth of this statement, as I am not based in Poland. It is possible, given that there was a Bernardine Franciscan reform (so called after St. Bernardine of Siena), propagated by St. Bernardine and St. Giovanni da Capistrano. However, this reform did not affect the whole Order, and thus it seems unusual to my mind that the whole Order would be termed Bernardines (although someone with more knowledge of Poland may be able to explain this).
So I have removed this sentence ("In Poland the order is also known as the Bernardines) in the sincere belief that it is too generalised at the moment and may well be based on a misapprehension; if somebody wants to reinstate it (perhaps explaining the reason why it is so), then they can go ahead.
--Robotforaday 15:53, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Use of the term Bernardines
Talk:Cornflour

message: I think cornflour and cornstarch are not the same thing , I-m going to be bold and remove the redirect --Melaen 21:01, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Good, they are definitely not the same, but there may be justification in merging with masa and cornmeal.  Masa however is made from hominy, rather than being directly ground from unprocessed corn, but most uses of corn as flour other than masa are the coarser cornmeal.  Perhaps all these should be sections of maize, rather than separate articles. -- WormRunner | Talk 21:57, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm going to remove the circular definition of cornstarch, because it seems to imply that Americans may call cornmeal "cornflour."  Confiteordeo 17:21, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Having taken a step back, I now realise that was a rather circular entry. :-) I added a bit to make the UK usage clear (cornflour refers almost exclusively to cornstarch here, and 'cornstarch' itself wouldn't be familiar to a UK reader)  Fourohfour 16:50, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Sail training

message: Take a minute to read the comments at Talk:Sailing#Re-write effort -- non how-to et seq. Some of us are working on re-organizing the sailing-related articles. See if you agree with our approach and give us some help. Mrees1997 20:44, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Sailing]] re-organization effort 

message: NPOV? - Reads v much like an advert for the trust. What about Ocean Youth Trust who've been around since the 60's and sailed in Scotland on Taikoo, Alba Venturer as well as other chartered ones. Elwell 14:42, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leading organisation in Scotland? 

message: Following on the lines of Elwell, this article does not read like an encyclopedia article, but as an extended personal analysis of some sort: an advertisement, an essay, or a magazine article. There's much inappropriate, and a good part of that seems to be original research. This type of sentence is an example: "Many people today are more familiar with the loops and turns of a roller coaster than the rhythmic motion of the sea." (I've removed a several other such sentences, already, but the article still very largely needs rewrite, with inline citations.)
I can't speak to Elwell's comment about being specifically an advertisement for the Scottish trust, however I did not find the information in the article related to a PBS special where teens and 20s went across the Atlantic by sail as part of their maritime qualification. (Benelux countries?) 
Also, in rewrite, common words should not be wikilinked, especially those not central to the article topic, such as "loops", "World War I" and "risk". See WP:CONTEXT for more on this.
Piano non troppo (talk) 19:08, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite needed
Talk:New Democratic Party Socialist Caucus

message: As one of the "floor managers" I can say SC worked with NPI to pass  versions of the resolution at riding meetings and  worked with NPI on floor strategy at teh convention. NPI  seemed to take it for granted their resolution would be amply debated. The S,  advised that it had been given a low priority, a familiar tactic of the "Establishment" to smother  debate.NPI  appealed and got a higher priority. We also advised the "establishment" likely would squat at all the mikes to block debate and offered to work with them to ensure they had a chance to speak. It was largely thanks to the SC that NPI managed to control the pro mikes by doing their own squat. The one SC speaker at the mike had been negotiated with the NPI, by us giving up a place NPI wanted-the third speaking spot on the pro mikes and taking the 6th spot.
There is no evidence thay are Democratic Socialist political movement. However there is evidence that thay are Socialist political movement. And thay are far left. This is on there web site Michaelm 06:07, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  ... 

message: Hi all.  I've added a notability flag to this topic as there is no evidence here that the topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.  If you have evidence of this, please add the citations. vckeating (talk) 10:15, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 