lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Carriel

message: At present the article says [It]] is also used by modern businessmen throughout the country. This is in conflict with the cited sources,  which says Oddly, you probably won't see many people other than tourists actually using these unique handbags. and  which says lo que pasa es que con el tiempo las personas dejaron de usar carriel y se perdió un poco la tradición. ("What happens is that eventually people stopped using the carriel and lost a little tradition.") I believe that the statement about modern businessmen should be removed as unsourced and inaccurate. --Bejnar (talk) 20:35, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Modern businessmen
Talk:Sobotka family on The Wire

message: I think there should just be one article for IBS, since most of the Sobotkas are in the union, with a "Family" slot at the bottom covering Joan and Louis. ThatGuamGuy 05:58, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that this article is uneccessary, but I think they can both sit happily under the docks header in one larger subarticle at Characters from the docks of The Wire.--Opark 77 12:06, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Prison religion

message: Here are all the references I've dug up; I've used most of them in the article (and even those still have more material we can include that I hadn't mentioned).
*Google search: Prison preacher
*Google search: Prison ministry
*Google search: Prison search
*Christian Post on Prison religion
*how-to
*prisoners.com - religion
*Scranton Jesuit University - Religion in prison
*Radical Religion in prison - Intelligence report
*UAB study - positive effects of prison religion
*racist religion in prisons
*SageJournals online - The value of religion in prison
*Native American religion in prison - Associated Press
*The Prison Preacher Problem - Stephen Schwartz, New York Post
*In prison, a preacher without a pulpit - William R. Levesque, St. Petersburg Times Online
*Statement of Purpose - Chaplaincy, HM Prison Service
V-Man737 06:01, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[In the beginning]], [[AYBABTU|war was beginning]].

message: Time to merge I think, the other article in may of this year became a more comprehensive article on the same topic, though it started out as specific about islam. nonetheless, no need for two stubby articles when one will do. any objections? along the lines of the prod request, perhaps if no one objects by 12/22 we can move all the content here to the other article. - Owlmonkey (talk) 19:08, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with [[Religion in United States prisons]]

message: God in Captivity: The Rise of Faith-Based Prison Ministries in the Age of Mass Incarceration by Tanya Erzen, 2017, Beacon Press Jodi.a.schneider (talk) 01:51, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  New book
Talk:IAE V2500

message: I am doubtful of some of these thrust ratings:
Please see the type certificate:
https://www.easa.europa.eu/sites/default/files/dfu/IM%20E%20069%20Issue04_20191212.pdf
Where is the source for the thrust ratings in the specifications table?
Legoboyvdlp Let's talk!  23:25, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Updated from TCDS.--Marc Lacoste (talk) 08:33, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thrust Ratings Comment 

message: Hi,now the product of the IAE V2500 is owned by Pratt & Whitney? BeirutMa2021 (talk) 22:20, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: No. It's still a IAE product. BilCat (talk) 00:34, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: No. There  are other partners too, according to the company article. BilCat (talk) 04:22, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  IAE V2500 or now P&W V2500 

message: Apologies if I'm missing something, but I haven't been able to find a source for the US$11.1M unit cost. Is this based on inflation taken from the 1989 figure or an accurate representation of the costs today? If it's the former, surely this may be misleading and should be clarified in the article, along with when "today" is? Thanks, 138.251.128.81 (talk) 01:10, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I've noticed the formatting of the page confirms it relates to inflation, so I've removed the claim. 138.251.128.81 (talk) 00:40, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unit cost?
Talk:Lockheed D-21

message: There is no point to any related development links in the See also section if they're already linked in the lede of the article.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:03, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Related development link 

message: Several sources I've read claim that there were actually five operational flights in the D-21 program, and that the exact details of the fifth are still secret. Naturally, due to the very nature of these rumors they may be impossible to confirm or deny, but I wanted to bring this up here before putting it in the article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.81.176.133 (talk) 00:06, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Be prepared to defend your sources. Self-published books, etc., will be deleted as not meeting WP:RS.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:41, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: This article, which was written by a former SR-71 crew chief, mentions there being five operational D-21 missions but says nothing about the nature of the fifth one. I have encountered mention of a fifth, classified D-21 flight elsewhere as well, but mostly on message boards and forums that do not meet Wikipedia's standards. It's certainly possible, since some aspects of the SR-71/A-12 family's operational history are still secret. For example, the SR-71's top speed is officially Mach 3.3, but reports say it could reach Mach 3.5. An extra D-21 flight or two seems like the sort of thing that they might still be hiding. unsigned comment added by 24.224.66.196 (talk) 00:06, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  That article (http://sr71.com/srlink~1.htm) is only a web page with a long list of links on it.  This isn't even a decent reference and there's no direct way to check on this supposed 5th mission. -Fnlayson (talk) 21:52, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible fifth operational flight?
Talk:Primera División de Futsal

message: "If two or more teams are level on points, the winner is the team that has the best results" What does this mean? 85.226.204.42 (talk) 10:16, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tie-breaking
Talk:Alberta Highway 20

message: the last line where it goes says it goes just on the outskirts of Sylvan Lake. It goes through It... look at a map.
142.59.114.148 06:06, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Rolls-Royce RB.44 Tay

message: I've generally heard the Pratt & Whitney J48 described as a licensed-built Tay, and it is treated as such in this article. Howerver, Bill Gunston, in his World Encyclopedia of Aero Engines (c.2006 edition) states that the Tay/J48 were developed by both PW and RR together, as an improvement on the Nene? (which PW did build under license as the J42). Gunston is generally reliable as a writer, and his usual pro-British bent (totally understandable!) lends credence to this being accurate. Are there any objections to my updating the article to reflect the role of PW as a co-developer, not a mere licensee? Please be prepared to submit reliable sources, especially since the article currently has none. Thanks. - BillCJ (talk) 12:00, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Just did a quick search of the 'Flight' archive and found this which says it was a joint development. Maybe there was a license involved as well. Bit of a challenge finding info on these older engines, got a couple of books on the way that should help. Cheers Nimbus (talk) 12:44, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

text: It was an enlarged Nene, designed by a team consisting of engineers from both companies working at Derby, at the request of the US Navy. See quite comprehensive forum post on UK gas turbine engines here:   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.7.147.13 (talk) 18:48, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: P&W contributions
Talk:Carl Fenton

message: Obviously the answer is not entirely obvious, but here are the three main points to consider:
The name was invented by Haenschen...
For use by Brunswick...
And was legally taken over by Greenberg.
I would argue that Fenton did NOT die when Haenschen did, but when Greenberg did.
First, Haenschen (to my knowledge) did not use the name after he left Brunswick in 1927.
Second, the name ceased to be when Greenberg died.
Imagine a corporate brand was created by corporation A but sold to corporation B in the 1920s. B then goes under in 1940, and A goes belly-up in 1980. Do we then say that the brand died in 1980? Doubtful.
Possible solutions:
Handle the name "Carl Fenton" entirely as a band name.
Handle it as part (even the major part) of a Greenberg bio.
-Frank —The preceding unsigned comment was added by FrankBlissett (talk • contribs) 03:37, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need to clarify "who" Carl Fenton is.
Talk:James Dickey

message: Reverted to the old stub page; the recent longish revision was copy/pasted from Dickey's NY Times obituary and was unattributed. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 199.123.79.97 (talk) 13:50, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright infringement 

message: "Night Hurding (1983)" should be Night Hurdling (1983)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.108.219.23 (talk) 17:01, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  error in bibliography section 

message: Is it just possible that writing Deliverance might not be more notable, more of an identifying achievement, and more likely what a user is looking for in accessing a James Dickey article than receiving  the "Order of the South"? And perhaps Deliverance ought to be mentioned in the lead? Cynwolfe (talk) 02:15, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  burying Deliverance 
Talk:2002 Women's Rugby World Cup

message: Why does the final table not agree to the playoff results? Stevebritgimp (talk) 14:41, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Final Table
Talk:2006 IBF World Championships

message: Thanks for uploading :Image:2006 IBF World.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the  tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as  or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:21, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Unspecified source for [[:Image:2006 IBF World.gif]]
Talk:Louisa Swain

message: of course, do not merge; notable people deserve their own articles. Hmains 06:12, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Definitely not 1918; she died in 1880. - Immigrant laborer (talk) 16:23, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  When was the photo taken? 

message: Just stooping by to say thanks to  for expanding the passage about her voting. Before that it was totally unclear how it became possible for her to vote, and whether it was legal or some kind of cheating. (It's really strange that the article got to OTD without that essential piece of information!) 95.213.168.66 (talk) 19:28, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem! Pac-Man PHD (talk) 20:04, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thanks for clarification
Talk:2008 IAAF World Indoor Championships

message: The comment on the long jump distance of 8.06m, "Mokoena's result was the shortest winning jump in the history of the World Indoor Championships", doesn't seem to be accurate, because the 1985 results show a winning jump of 7.96m.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.146.25.206 (talk) 15:14, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Long jump
Talk:Posse

message: POSSE from Queen's University appears to be non-notable, and I don't think it's going to get its own page in Wikipedia.  (There are only 8 hits on Google, all of them directly connected with the university.)  The synonym entry with 'awesome' is 1) a dictionary entry which does not belong to Wikipedia, and 2) it may not even be correct (at least none of the dictionaries I've consulted contained that meaning). Saligron 06:13, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questionable entries
Talk:Agent M

message: Come on, who did not know her name. It is not like she kept this a secret.
: Mentioning the real name of a performer who takes a stage name does not strike me as an invasion of privacy. In any case, her real name was outed a long time ago in at least 3 places: Tsunami Bomb, Music Performer Pseudonyms, Portland Mercury 2005/02/10. Simishag 21:22, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: and also on the guttermouth cd georgous.
Not to mention the writting credits inside every Tsunami Bomb CD...114.72.238.24 (talk) 22:00, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Her Name
Talk:Deliverance (novel)

message: Although I haven't amended the "Top" importance of the "georgia project" as I known nothing of this novels relative importance in "Georgia USA" I could not see how the existing small article could be anything more than a stub. Also if an article covers a subject that important it would be normal to include sections like ==Literary significance & criticism== ==Allusions/references to actual history, geography and current science== ==Awards and nominations== which may naturally have material to demonstrate notability. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 09:03, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You are absolutely correct. I believe I copied the project tag over from the movie page, Deliverance, and apparently forgot to change the class accordingly.  Thanks for catching that. --Roswell native 14:18, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why is the story called "Deliverance"? Maikel (talk) 15:46, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: In the book, they don't see the albino child playing banjo. 
The old man sees the Martin in the car and hollers for the boy to come out. 76.189.108.58 (talk) 11:33, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot is incorrect
Talk:List of weather instruments

message: Why are simple instruments like barometers and thermometers not in this list? This seems to be instrumentation systems only. —Goodtimber (walk/talk) 18:15, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Simple instruments 

message: What is the represantation of weather elements 41.220.27.78 (talk) 16:29, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geography 

message: of the eight instrument used measure weather 45.215.254.233 (talk) 04:40, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geography
Talk:Spanish International (badminton)

message: Surely someone, somewhere, has written about these games. WP:Primary sources do not advance notability. --  Otr500 (talk) 13:24, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Sourcing and notability
Talk:Alcúdia

message: The whole article smacks of opinion rather than fact. Stating that a street appears "cheesy" and has "something for everyone" is hardly a catalogue of facts about a town. Perhaps it would be safer to rephrase that the town has become massively "English" in it's facilities and services to accommodate holidaymakers? 82.7.63.22 06:26, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Now, this is 13 years later, but you are right. It seems like a big advertisment overall. If someone wants to ping me to reassess this, I'd be happy to check it over again.Albertkaloo (talk) 18:08, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: Hi 
We believe that the article on Alcudia, Mallorca could be further enhance by introducing a link to our factual and informative website page for Alcudia & Puerto de Alcudia.
The link could be placed on the section for external refernces or in fact within the body of the text as you will find the information to be both factual and useful to visitors to Alcudia and Ex-Pats alike.
The URL to be included is   
Many thanks
Mallorca Now (talk) 16:58, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see WP:EL. I appreciate the fact that you discuss the placement of this link rather than just placing it everywhere. However, I see no reason to include this link. You have requested the placement of this domain on various wikipedia projects. If you do place this link, it will constitute spam and your link might be blacklisted on all wikipedia projects. EdBever (talk) 19:02, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  External References
Talk:Bellver Castle

message: Why does the article speak mainly about post-Civil War repression, rather than the castle itself? Also, the article gives the impression that Jovellanos was imprisoned there after the Civil War, which he was not (Jovellanos died in 1811)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.49.39.78 (talk) 13:23, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I am not a member of the Spanish history group, so I feel that I should not write here, but the information about the victims of the Franco dictatorship and its roots should be included in an article about modern Spanish history, not here. There is certainly much more relevant to be said about the Belver fortification. How soon could someone take care of this? Lave (talk) 18:41, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong place for repression?

message: A Google search for "mounted peelers" yields several hits, all of which simply make the same statement that is made in this article: "The surrounding forest encloses the stables of the city's Mounted Peelers."  No explanations whatsoever.  So -- what are they, who are they, and why are they? 67.231.66.125 (talk) 21:16, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mounted peelers
Talk:Resiniferatoxin

message: Any thoughts of making a plain words translation for us mortals? 75.177.131.250 (talk) 04:16, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article is barely useful as it stands. I encountered it in passing and corrected a statement more or less cribbed form the chemical hazard sheet, but even after a bit of rewording I am not impressed. "Animal experiments indicate that in humans ingestion of 40g or more may be fatal or cause serious damage to health" As a toxicity warning, that suggests a hazard about on a par with table salt! Does anyone have any more useful information? JonRichfield (talk) 11:19, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs serious attention

message: The article at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scoville_scale claims a rating of 15 billion Scoville, while this article states 16 billion.  Which is correct? BlackVegetable (talk) 20:36, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Inconsistent?

message: I removed content about the scoville scale rating in these diffs.  The information was not reliably sourced here.  I looked and there is a lot of crap, unsourced information out there on the internet.  Where did the 16M number come from?  We need a reliable source before we put that back in. Jytdog (talk) 06:25, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scoville scale 

message: The toxicity section lists a dose in grams immediately after a rat LD50 in mg/kg. The source attached is not specific to RTX and only lays out how to estimate LD50 in humans from values for other animals. The dose therefore must be a mg/kg value multiplied by some body weight in kg which is not stated. Either adding what body weight is used or simply stating the estimated LD50 in mg/kg would be better. pedanticLoser🗯️ 22:37, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the paragraph on human toxicity. Same issues, even adding "in an average adult" would be better than an uncontextualized dosage in grams. pedanticLoser🗯️ 18:45, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dosing in Toxicity Section
Talk:Es Mercadal

message: Hello. This is to let you know that I uploaded to Wikimedia a number of pictures of Es Mercadal. This is just in case you would like to illustrate further your article about the town. Thanks for your attention.81.38.25.21 (talk) 12:04, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: Why is it called "Es Mercadal", and not just "Mercadal"? Does es mean something relevant to this in Catalan? Peter Chastain [¡habla!] 10:53, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why Es?
Talk:Retinoic acid receptor

message: From my college Biology class, I've been given a good research paper that can be used to expand this stub.
Overview of Retinoid Metabolism and Function
Rune Blomhoff, Heidi Kiil Blomhoff
Department of Nutrition,Institute of Basic Medical Sciences,University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
Department of Medical  Biochemistry, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences,
UniversityofOslo, Oslo, Norway
Received 2 October 2005;accepted 11 October 2005 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by VashTexan (talk • contribs) 19:09, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good Paper to expand this stub 

message: — Assignment last updated by Cdegori (talk) 17:14, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: CHEM 378 - Biochemistry Lab

message: — Assignment last updated by Angelicas1216 (talk) 21:32, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: CHEM 378
Talk:Palma Cathedral

message: How fortunate is this article name? If I'm not mistaken, "seu" is a generic Catalan term for "cathedral" (or an episcopal see at least). I suspect a Catalan from elsewhere would say "la Seu de Palma (de Mallorca)"? /83.253.58.192 (talk) 13:49, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening heading 

message: Sorry for reopening the closed discussion, but I did not see your comments. I would like to add some bibliography to my point. I did some research on the subject by looking for English bibliography about the Cathedral. I used the catalogue of the State Public Library of Mallorca (Can Sales), and I looked for books with subject Catedral de Mallorca (Palma, Mallorca) and language English. These are the results:
# Bauzà Bauzà, Joan (2017). Understanding the cathedral of Majorca : ten keys to its interpretation
# Darder Brotat, Joan (2010). Cathedral of Majorca : guided tour
# Janer Manila, Gabriel (2013). Little story of Mallorca Cathedral
# Julià Rosselló, Bernat (1960). Tourist guide of the cathedral of Majorca
# Llabrés Martorell, Pere Joan (2011). The Cathedral of Majorca : iconography of the Cathedral of Majorca : images of faith
# Llabrés Martorell, Pere Joan (2005). Gaudí in the Cathedral of Mallorca
# Llompart Moragues, Gabriel (2002). Mallorca cathedral
# Ripoll Arbós, Lluís (1971). Majorca's Cathedral : facts and figures
# The Cathedral of Mallorca, Ramon Llull Itinerary (2015), Aimpremta
Anyone can make such search, and the website is available in English. As you can see, there is no agreement on the structure Mallorca Cathedral/Cathedral of Mallorca nor agreement on the form Mallorca/Majorca, but what is clear is that, besides the Wikipedia, no other source calls it Palma Cathedral (nor Cathedral of Palma).    sorry for insisting, but do you think that, with that bibliographical support, the name change could get ahead?--Joan Gené (talk) 13:25, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems now obvious to me that there is some concealed reason to maintain the current name which is beyond my imagination, as my arguments stand far stronger than yours. I get that there is nothing to do.--Joan Gené (talk) 22:04, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that you are wrong, and understand neither my post nor AGF. Andrewa (talk) 16:47, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 19 October 2022