lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:JIS X 0213

message: Are there any JIS X 0213 characters which cannot be encoded with a single Unicode code point? --84.61.22.108 13:57, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, there are 25 such characters. The Unicode Consortium considers they should be encoded using combining characters even though that approach requires a complicated rendering software. --Tenpa 01:44, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

text: For example, JIS X 0213 incorporated katakana to (ト) with handakuten (゜). This character is used to write the Ainu language. However, Unicode didn't assign a single code point to this character because it could be represented by katakana to and combining handakuten (U+30C8 followed by U+309A). And there are 24 more similar cases. Unicode seems avoiding to incorporate more 'pre-composed' characters. ---I can't determine it is a good policy or not. --61.125.217.248 14:49, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unicode 

message: I have just added some material relating to JIS X 0212. I am in the process of writing a short entry for JIS X 0212, and when that's done, I'll return and link it back.JimBreen (talk) 22:39, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  JIS X 0212 

message: I intend to add some background information on JIS X 0213, and why it replaced JIS X 0212. I'd be interested if anyone else has some perspectives on this.JimBreen (talk) 22:39, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Background
Talk:Justice and public safety practitioner

message: Two identical articles about pretty much  the same thing, written by the same person. --Ladybirdintheuk 13:59, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Operation Jaywick

message: I feel that the following sentence should be changed since only 14 were aboard
:Aboard was a complement from Z Special Unit of four British and eleven Australian personnel, comprising:
The two pictures which are placed to the left need to be fixed in a border and have an appropriate caption.  Also, the "Belligerents" should be only "Z Special Unit", as it explains in that article that there were other nationalities involved.  It should also have the Australian flag since it was originally an Australian Unit with other nationalities involved.  Adamdaley (talk) 04:36, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually at the time all 'Australian' nationals would have been British subjects as separate Australian nationality did not exist until 1948.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.148.220.15 (talk) 09:57, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improving the Article 

message: The Hampshire Chronicle (weekly newspaper) on p41 of Thu 28 Dec 2023 has a piece relevant to this subject, entitled 'Wartime raid medal for auction'. (I cannot find a link to the piece on the HC's website, perhaps because it is a sponsored piece, effectively an advert for the auction house Pump House Auctions, whose own website does not list an auction on the date mentioned below, so is of little help.)
It reports that nine medals awarded to Acting Sergeant [listed as Corporal in the article], later Major Ronald George "Taffy" Morris of the Royal Army Medical Corps are to be auctioned on 17 January (2024). These include a "secret" "military medal" [evidently a mistyping of Military Medal, since one is pictured in the accompanying photo], one of only two awarded to members of the raid, approved by King George VI in May 1944 on the Secret List.
Morris (it says) was recruited to the SOE's "Orient Mission" as a Medical orderly, and took part in the Operation Jaywick raid. His award was for "gallantry and distinguished service as Medical Orderly in the MV Krait ship during the 48-day 4,000 mile round-trip raid on the harbour." The medals are being sold by his son Evan who has recently written his father's biography The Tiger's Revenge. I suggest that these and further details in the newspaper piece, and perhaps more in the book, might yield further facts worth inserting into the article. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 51.198.104.88 (talk) 04:42, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further source
Talk:Operation Catherine

message: There is an interesting old thread at the Axis History Forum: Proposed Royal Navy sortie in Baltic 1940. Some of the information there contradicts this article. -- Petri Krohn (talk) 15:14, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Axis History Forum 

message: I've moved the article to Operation Catherine, since that is what the sources call it. --Martin (talk) 22:13, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Operation Catherine
Talk:Florida State Road 9A

message: I think this article should be merged into Interstate 295, as they are basically the same highway.  Both I-295 and SR 9A form the Jacksonville Beltway, and SR 9A will soon be signed as I-295 as soon as the Federal Highway Administration passes approval.  SR 9A currently uses the mileage and exit numbers based off of I-295.  The I-295 article already includes the entire beltway in its total length and exit list, so having the same information in two articles seems redundant.  According to the Florida Department of Transportation the entire beltway is internally assigned as SR 9A and once the rest of the beltway officially becomes an interstate, the route will still internally be recognized as SR 9A by FDOT (just how I-4 is SR 400, I-95 is SR 9, I-75 is SR 93, etc.).  All this information can be viewed here. –Dream out loud (talk) 20:19, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Support: It sounds like this is essentially a done deal so I support this merger. Viridiscalculus (talk) 03:52, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

text: Support - These two roads are mutually related and will become one road once I-295 is extended, so it makes sense to cover them together. Dough4872 04:56, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It doesn't seem that there is any opposition to this move, and you both are active members of WP:USRD, so I'm going to go ahead and complete the merge. –Dream out loud (talk) 17:16, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger to [[Interstate 295 (Florida)]]
Talk:Florida State Road 10

message: I think this should be merged into US highway 90  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.106.193.194 (talk) 15:01, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Since not all of US 90 is SR 10, it should be kept as is. -------User:DanTD (talk)  13:06, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:High Wizardry

message: Is it worth adding the cameo appearance by the man in the bar as documented here?
HTH HAND —Phil | Talk 11:37, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cameo appearance 
Talk:Florida State Road 20

message: That intersection list is severly incomplete. It does not just include the Apalachee Parkway, and certainly isn't entirely in Tallahassee. Somebody should work on expanding this, and I just may be the one to do that. -------User:DanTD (talk)  13:34, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Done - using FDOT shapefile and geodatabase info. Concertmusic (talk) 16:30, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intersection list 
Talk:Rognvald Eysteinsson

message: The most common form in Norway, as seen on https://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ragnvald_M%C3%B8rejarl, is "Ragnvald".
Is there any reason why "Rognvald" seems to be preferred in this article?  Alvestrand (talk) 10:19, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ragnvald or Rognvald? 
Talk:Senate of Iran

message: I have added photos and improved pagination.
This article lacks encyclopedic value and seems to be rather partial.
In the coming months, I shall try to improve it as best I can but we need help.Yghiai 07:51, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improvements 

message: If, as this article claims, Iran's parliament is unicameral then what is the Guardian Council about then? Isn't the Guardian Council for all intents, constructions, and purposes the upper chamber of the Iranian parliament? As the wikipedia article about the Guardian Council says - it is the watchdog of the constitution and it can veto any law passed by the Majlis (Iranian Parliament). That sounds like the very definition of an upper chamber! At the very least this article should mention the Guardian Council somewhere.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.128.86.65 (talk) 05:48, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Guardian Council]] 
Talk:Belton, Texas

message: I am removing "This town did not get a Walmart Supercenter until 2005" because I do not think it is relevant.  Please let me know if you feel otherwise.   03:45, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think The Woman's Commonwealth deserves its own section. It is a very significant part of Belton history. Additionally, Martha McWhirter, the founder of The Woman's Commonwealth, should be listed in the Notable people section. Unless anyone objects, I will work on this and will also work on creating a Wikipedia article about McWhirter and about The Woman's Commonwealth that can be linked to the Belton article.AnaSoc (talk) 19:37, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Woman's Commonwealth and Martha McWhirter 

message: The city flag displayed in the infobox seems to be merely a product of someone's imagination.  The image Beltonflag.jpg was uploaded to Wikicommons in 2017 without any documentation other than a link to another image of the flag.  I can find no mention of a flag on the city's official website (beltontexas.gov), but I do see a photograph of a large wall decoration in the city council chamber, which is probably what somebody mistook for the "city flag":  see it here.
The image should be deleted from the infobox, and deleted from Wikicommons, too.  But I'm pleasantly retired and it's not worth my time on a sunny fall day to spend several hours getting such things discussed, reviewed, and removed - just posting this information here in case somebody else wants to have a go at removing this visual lie from Wikipedia.  Textorus (talk) 15:25, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fake Flag
Talk:Florida State Road 23

message: Anyone with knowledge on SR 23 and the Brannan Field-Caffee Expressway would be greatly appreciated to work on the the page for the Outer Beltway found here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Coast_Outer_Beltway
--Mattius92 (talk) 23:50, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

message: ? Seriously? Unschool 04:54, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  No map
Talk:860

message: There are two theory´s in who Rollo of Normandy is. So it´s not acceptable to claiming that Hrolf Gange WAS the founder of Normandy. --Comanche cph 14:27, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see :Talk:Viking Age. Inge 23:58, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hrolf Ganger 

message: Is Weyhe really important enough to warrant a mention? I don't think we should have an entry in these year articles for the first written mention of every small town in Europe (or the world)! A. Parrot (talk) 02:28, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weyhe
Talk:RS-449

message: Everything I've looked at listing the RS-449 interface seems to have a common error: the pinout listing shows a differential signal "Data Mode" (DM) on pins 11 and 29, but the signal description does not include DM and describes a signal CF instead (which is not on the pinout listing).  Can anyone tell me why?
Also, there is a frequent confusion between RS-449 and RS-499 as if one is a typing mistake of the other.  Can anyone resolve this?
Ken Wood
62.254.246.40 14:30, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
Template talk:Transfusion medicine

message: Transfusion reactions are immediate or delayed and the whole subject is complicated. As well as RBC antibody reactions, some reactions are due to WBC antibodies or to platelet antibodies.  I feel that transfusion reactions could have its own page, in which case it would feature in the template box as one item only.  The infections link is not particularly related to transfusion infections, I feel. 
There would be room for Blood products to feature in the template box with a heading. Snowman 14:32, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Added to template, but it's going to make some of the pages in this group quite heavy with templates. --apers0n 15:57, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Transfusion reactions now linked to page fragment, which on the blood transfusion page, which is already in box.  Perhaps this link could be deleted, until transfuion reactions has its own page.  It has been some years since I worked in a blood bank, so I will not add much to a transfusion reaction page. Snowman 21:42, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Transfusion reactions in template box?

message: I recently requested that an article Blood product be created and User:MastCell was kind enough to do so. 
Do we want to include a link to Blood product in the template Transfusion medicine? -- Writtenonsand (talk) 14:19, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article [[Blood product]]. Do we want link in template?
Talk:Bovey Tracey

message: The latest revision of this page is not helpful.
Whilst the point about the origins of the town's name is valid, to simply remove all that was on the page previously seems too extreme. What followed in the article was correct and not deserving of removal.
Any thoughts before I made amendments and then recreate the page based on what was there previously? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mike Lund (talk • contribs) .
: Hi Mike - how's Phil? 
: The blanking was probably an error, but the comment needs to be worked into the text better, with a citation, so I have reverted for now.
: Here is the removed text:
::(The "Boffa" claim is pure supposition since no record of this exists. The Town actually takes its name from the River Bovi)
: --HappyDog 17:28, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Oscar Mayer

message: I don't know who added it, but someone added "died July 8, 2009 at age 95 into the birth-death info of the ORIGINAL Oscar F. Mayer.... who was born in 1859 and had died, as it was already clearly stated, on March 11, 1955. The Oscar Mayer who died in 2009 is the original Oscar Mayer's GRANDSON, the third man named Oscar Mayer to lead the company. If the original Oscar Mayer had died today, he would have been 150 YEARS OLD. Come on, people, use some common sense!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mellophonius (talk • contribs) 02:44, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent death of grandson 

message: We need a paragraph summarizing the three Oscar Mayers to head the company. As is, this article is confusing.
Robert1947 (talk) 02:56, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Three Oscar Mayers 

message: Louis Rich redirects here, but I can't find this name on the page. 81.182.236.20 (talk) 20:54, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Louis Rich??? 

message: Koesingen is not in Bavaria, it's only very near to Bavaria.
77.182.176.16 (talk) 22:22, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Koesingen 

message: Hello my name is Bobby.
I was wondering if you might have any high value coupons for Oscar Meyer products., meats..
The meats would go to a church. Church name: Ozias Missionary Baptist Church .
Thank you so much for any help you can provide..
   Sincerely, BobbyP. Pede-bobb (talk) 22:59, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Welcome to Wikipedia! Unfortunately, we have no coupons of any kind - Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and has articles about their subjects, written collaboratively by many people around the world. There's no affiliation to the subjects of articles. I suggest you get in contact with Oscar Meyer themselves and ask them directly. stwalkerster (sock | talk) 14:07, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coupons 

message: Why did you stop making fat free Bologna 151.196.244.202 (talk) 16:22, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see WP:FORUM. --The helper5667 (talk) 00:28, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why did you stop making fat free bologna 

message: When are you gonna start making it? 2601:603:700:3030:A573:ADEE:52AD:1340 (talk) 23:16, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Turkey bologna
Talk:Florida State Road 46

message: Does anyone know if 46A used to be SR 46, but then the roadway was re-routed and the older portion became the county road?  I was told this but have not been able to verify the information.67.105.21.234 (talk) 17:32, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  CR 46-A 
Talk:Battle royal (professional wrestling)

message: Would anyone object to actual lists of battle royals (participants, eliminations, winners) being added here to this page? I collect tons of them from WWE, WWF and even WCW so can toss them together pretty quick. It'd be far from a complete list but it's something different I guess... --SLWalsh 16:37, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Lists of battle royals

message: Suggestion for improvement: add info on the origins and history of "Battle Royales" in wrestling RaiderRich2001 (talk) 03:34, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Origin of "battle royale"

message: This article seems primarily to be written from an "in-universe" perspective -- i.e., the universe in which professional wrestling is a competitive sport, rather than the reality of its consisting of staged, theatrical exhibitions. Per WP:UNIVERSE , it should be rewritten to reflect actual reality. -Waidawut (talk)  — Preceding undated comment added 21:29, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not needed.  All this article does is describe all the various kinds of matches there are and their different formats/gimmicks/rules.  Nothing "in-universe" about it. Vjmlhds (talk) 18:57, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  In-universe 

message: There's literally two sentences in this article describing the concept of a battle royal and then a huge amount of detail on "variations".  Surely there must be more to say about the general concept - when were they first held, for example? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:07, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Structure
Talk:Florida State Road 50

message: When did this happen, and how(and why?)? ---- DanTD 13:50, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: UPDATE - Looks like I waa wrong, and it was for a former section of SR 50. ----DanTD (talk) 16:51, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Demolition of the Econlockhatchee River bridge?

message: The history section needs to be rewritten to prose instead of a list.  Additionally, two junctions need to be removed from the infobox to attain the 10 maximum per USRD standards. --LJ (talk) 22:52, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I understand your complaints regarding the infobox, but since all are major highways it's difficult to pick which ones should go. ----DanTD (talk) 00:55, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: history & infobox

message: Don't have ref for this but historically, 1) 50 is the dividing line between the "real south" which is north of the road and the "new" south, which are transplanted "Yankees", located south of the road. 2) on the east coast, a blurry line between northern plants which grow north of the road and more tropical trees which grow more easily south of it. 3) the dividing line above which sinkholes are found and below which, they aren't! 
it is theoretically, half-way down Florida since its number is halfway. Student7 (talk) 04:04, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: History

message: I took the initiative to add SR 417 near Union Park as a major junction but put us one over the USRD standard of 10 max. After careful consideration I selected US 98 to be replaced due to several factors. It is a fairly insignificant two lane road through the jct w/ SR 50 and the US 98 Wiki article fails to reciprocate SR 50 in it's own Infobox/major junctions list. Meanwhile SR 417 is a six lane expressway with a full interchange at SR 50. I certainly do not wish the update to be controversial at all. As such I invite others to share feedback here that could help form a wider consensus. Thanks for reading/listening!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jasap (talk • contribs) 05:04, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox Major Junctions
Talk:Florida State Road 50A

message: Whoever decided that this needs a map, I've got two things to say. 1)You should let me make an infobox firsr, and 2)You're going to have to zoom in pretty close on Brooksville, Florida in order to get one here. ---- DanTD 01:19, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: UPDATE: Okay, whoever has a map, go for it. ---- DanTD 22:38, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hold off on any maps
Talk:Carver Federal Savings Bank

message: This is a copy and paste of the bank's profile from the Yahoo Finance profile for the company. Is this a copyvio, or is the material provided directly from public filings? -- Mikeblas 14:35, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  copyvio? 

message: The sentence seems very artistic in its descriptions. 
"used his immense talent to improve the economic status of his community, race, and all of mankind" who are we to speak of his talent?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ermik (talk • contribs) 12:23, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Descriptors used in history block
Talk:The Scarab Murder Case

message: After consulting with Carl Bunderson, I am undoing his deletion of the external link to my Mystery*File blog.  Mystery*File is a scholarly activity, with many well-known mystery authors and editors contributing. It is totally non-commercial, and I am adding this link only for informational purposes.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.192.31.40 (talk) 00:46, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that it's non-commercial.  I have to object to the word "scholarly", because this activity is in no sense peer-reviewed.  Essentially, we have no idea of the qualifications of the author in question that give her "expert" status; I note from tracing the link that the author of the review is a writer of mysteries herself, but that status doesn't seem to lend her any particular expertise in the area of Golden Age mysteries (I'd be more accepting of her expertise if she was sufficiently expert to make the New York Times best-seller list or had published criticism in that area).  The specific review doesn't have any intellectual rigour, there is no analysis beyond "I guessed the criminal's identity and you probably will too", and no attempt to enlighten the reader about either Van Dine's individual history (and where exactly this volume fits in) or how this volume and Van Dine fit into the Golden Age mystery.  It's also possible that this link is being provided simply to drive traffic to the author's website.  I agree with the original deletion, suggest the citation be re-removed, and suggest that in the future, individual entries in the Mystery*File blog be considered on a case-by-case basis.  If there is expertise there, let's cite it; this doesn't seem to have any.  Accounting4Taste:talk 16:37, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: External Link to Mystery*File blog
Talk:Film memorabilia

message: So why do people TAG without any kind of discussion here? We have rules for a reason, people.  Specific criticism is welcome, blanket Tags are not.  Please remove the Tag or add to the discussion. User:phishman  28 June 2006
No, this article can be large enough by itself.  When we include everything that it may involve.  DO Not Merge without Discussion, Please. User:phishman  28 June 2006
I will admit some confusion -- it's not clear to me why there should be two seperate articles, when both of them seem to cover the same subject? Unless I'm missing something, and please let me know if there's an important distinction I'm missing. Luna Santin 11:55, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal

message: Is this article about film memorabilia, the "community", or the web sites mentioned? It seems like the previous merge has made this article confusing and off-topic. -jca2112 02:06, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've tried to fix it a little - mostly minor tweaks, though. I do wonder about the mention of specific websites, except for eBay (eBay is very independently notable and has obviously had an effect on the trade of buying and selling film memorabilia, which definitely relates to the topic at hand). MoPo, though... I have never heard of it, though I've only recently gotten into collecting this stuff, so I wouldn't know if it's really notable enough or not. Runa27 20:47, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV / Advert? 