lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Bharatpur district

message: Note:  Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 06:44, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition 

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Moneytrees🏝️Talk🌴Help out at CCI!  05:20, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:Chittorgarh district

message: Note:  Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 06:52, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition 
Talk:Bathinda district

message: http://punjabrevenue.nic.in/gaz_bath1.htm
http://books.google.com/books?id=Kpd9lLY_0-IC&pg=PA171&lpg=PA171&dq=bathinda+district&source=bl&ots=W1304pwpSd&sig=jNFAxiidcCLsiy2hsh-YOgk9VyI&hl=en&ei=6-cdS9V7kegx_v6tngo&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3&ved=0CA4Q6AEwAjgU#v=onepage&q=bathinda%20district&f=false
http://bathinda.nic.in/html/district_at_a_glance.html  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Profitoftruth85 (talk • contribs) 05:54, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mansa district, India

message: The following coordinate fixes are needed for
—2409:4055:519:6CB7:D539:AC8A:73BA:1DFD (talk) 03:13, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: You haven't explained what is erroneous about the coordinates, and they appear to be correct. If you think that there is an error, you'll need to provide a clear explanation of what it is. Deor (talk) 06:39, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error
Talk:Cuttack district

message: Note:  Project Banner with Orissa workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Orissa or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 07:08, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Orissa Addition 

message: Q Odishctc (talk) 18:43, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  q 
Talk:Systems management

message: * Removed listings of commercial products and companies.  Listing of selected companies can be seen as representing bias or endorsing more weight on a few "selected' companies.  It's probably best to continue keeping references like this out of the article in order to maintain Wikipedia's Neutral point of view This decision was also taken previously for other articles such as Complex Event Processing and Stream Processing.  
* As policy states, Wikipedia is not a repository for lists, directories or Advocacy of commercial products and/or websites. NPOV requires views to be represented without bias, this applies not only to article text, but to companies, products, external links, and any other material as well. It is not Wikipedia's purpose to include a comprehensive list of companies, products or external links.
Bardcom 20:53, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed References to Commercial Products and Companies 

message: Please provide additional info about BMC PATROL product such as BMC Software well known customers and technical background (standards and technologies) of this product. Or write an article about this company and product family. — Anrie Nord 15:57, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: BMC Patrol is reasonably well-known where I live (Wellington, New Zealand). EDS used it for many years to manage servers, both internally and for customers. I think it's important enough to warrant being listed. --LesleyW 05:51, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  BMC PATROL 

message: the following
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?as_q=systematic+management&num=10&btnG=Search+Scholar&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_occt=title&as_sauthors=&as_publication=&as_ylo=&as_yhi=&as_allsubj=all&hl=en
--222.64.223.131 (talk) 09:24, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  A red link is referred to.... 

message: This article is written from a computer/IT perspective only. Systems management is  a whole field of managing different systems. Computer infrastructure is only one of these fields. The article should at least make mention of this. 83.86.4.72 (talk) 11:49, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: In computing "system(s) management" is a commonly used expression. Do you know of other areas where this expression is used (as commonly as in computing)? I'd be happy to hear about it - especially as what you say is mentioned in the introduction - please include it in the article if so. --Alien4 (talk) 12:54, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Nerd alert
Talk:Akola district

message: According to the recent updates of information about Akola district, available on the Indian government gazette, the information given in Wikipedia must be corrected.--Akshaya_P 14:43, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Washim district

message: User:Nilnone dumped a lot of text on History of the district, copying from this webpage. I have reverted these changes, and will report to admins, if it is reported. This user's talk page shows that this was not the first time that he tried this activity.--GDibyendu (talk) 14:54, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attempts to copy-paste from website 

message: You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Washim#Basim.  Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:43, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion at [[Talk:Washim#Basim]]
Talk:Resolvability criterion

message: This definition of "resolvability" seems to be due to Markus Schulze. Steve Eppley however, calls this instead "reasonable determinism" and uses "resolvability" to indicate a different criterion . It would be nice if the people could agree on the terminology. -- Dissident (Talk) 13:16, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It is nothing special that definitions differ slightly from paper to paper. As long as the authors define their terms properly, I don't see any problem with it. Markus Schulze 22:03, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a problem in the sense that it makes it harder to settle on the terminology used by Wikipedia (I assume you got dibs here based on your famous paper). So what should we call Steve Eppley's resolvability criterion then? The "tiebreaker criterion"? -- Dissident (Talk) 23:19, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

text: If it's true that the weakest links in the strongest paths towards the other co-winners do not form a cycle (and thus a ballot increasing all of them is constructible), that's not enough. By adding that ballot the strongest paths towards A must not increase as well. This might very well be the case, but you didn't say so. You might want to include a formal proof of Tideman's resolvability in your latest paper (just calling it resolvability and renaming Woodall's version to discrimination). -- Dissident (Talk) 19:25, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Dear Dissident, thank you for your suggestions. You can now find a detailed proof in section 4.1.2 of my paper. Markus Schulze 00:18, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A minor point perhaps, but in the introduction of 4.1, you talk about resolvability in the case of more than one candidate, but Tideman's version is stronger than that insofar that it also implies mono-add-plump. This doesn't pertain to 4.1.2, where you drop the more than one candidate requirement in the proof. -- Dissident (Talk) 01:18, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 2005 & 2006 comments
Talk:Solapur district

message: There is discussion going on regarding moving article name Vithoba to Vitthal. As Lord Vitthal belongs to Solapur district posting it here for further opinion from related people. Thank you. Relevant discussion can be found at Talk:Vithoba#Requested move 29 July 2015 --Human3015Send WikiLove  02:28, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfC for move at [[Talk:Vithoba]] 

message: I've got a bit of a problem with the district's census figures in relation to the village of Wangi. I would be grateful if anyone had any advice to offer at Wikipedia_talk:Noticeboard_for_India-related_topics#Census_village_query. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 12:31, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wangi - census figures
Talk:Sangli district

message: Discrepancy in Literacy Rate - In the box it is mentioned as 62.41%, whereas in the body of the text under 'Demographics' it is mentioned as 82.62%. Which one is correct?
Please check if this link works
http://www.sanglipolice.org/sanglipolice_html_files/sangli_map.htm  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ssd123ssd (talk • contribs) 08:48, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Raigad district

message: I was redirected to this page from Raigarh district.  Is this supposed to happen? Paul Haymon 22:30, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good question.  The 2011 census atlas gives the name of the district as Raigarh.  Perhaps an explanation of the two names might be useful.  Skinsmoke (talk) 10:09, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Raigarh district? 

message: Why dos this page contain only history of Raigad District  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12syd (talk • contribs) 11:11, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Raigad?

message: i put in the reference tags, however some of the refences use abbreviations. to whoever wrote the original text, please compile a list of the full titles used in the article an insert them at the end under literature. thanks.--87.171.92.204 (talk) 17:14, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: references
Talk:Kolhapur district

message: Here is an example of why readers don't trust Wikipedia.
 Its population growth rate over the decade 2001-2011 was 9.96%.
Piping population growth rate to Family planning in India is careless at best. The phrase doesn't even appear in the target article. The editor couldn't be bothered to look up the definition before he or she copied the selfsame sentence onto score of pages.   A look at the reference and you'll see no discussion of the growth rate, only the growth. Precision in speech does make a difference, unless the goal is election to public office.  Other editors of similar pages use the population growth rate properly and cite the correct figures.  Rhadow (talk) 17:37, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Noting that this was resolved some time ago. Klbrain (talk) 14:45, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sloppy editing 

message: Can be merged to the "Administration and divisions" section -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:10, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 14:57, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Kolhapur Zilla Parishad]] into [[Kolhapur district]]
Talk:Nandurbar district

message: The following coordinate fixes are needed for
(21.3712875,74.2430718)
—2405:204:21B:3075:7544:11B4:94F7:F852 (talk) 01:57, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The coordinates you've given are those of Nandurbar city (and are, even so, overprecise). I've changed the coordinates in the article to appropriately (im)precise (deg/min) coordinates for a point near the center of the district. Deor (talk) 16:53, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error
Talk:Jalgaon district

message: You are invited to work on Ahirani language wiki at  Ahirani Wikipedia in incubation . Mahitgar (talk) 04:36, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ahirani Wikipedia in incubation 

message: Moved GA nom to top of page David notMD (talk) 15:37, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nominating this article for GA Status 

message: This article's infobox probably have worng details about highways of this district. Huge Earth (talk) 13:10, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong highway numbers. 

message: I notice that many categories are repeated in the article: for example, Education has its own category in addition to a subcategory under History.
There are also sections that are in a completely wrong category: an example I just fixed is Railways being under History instead of being under Connectivity (which I took the liberty of renaming to Transport). The temples, too, should be either moved to their own category, like Landmarks, instead of being under Wildlife.
I can do this, but I'm reluctant to do so, because I might remove vital information by accident. I hope a local of the district, or at the very least an Indian national with more access to sources can fix these issues instead. Yo.dazo (talk) 17:39, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplication in many places; wrong categorization in others 

message: This article don't has maps in Geography section. Maps are very important to understand the geography. If you able to incorporate some maps it will be helpful. Huge Earth (talk) 06:53, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add some Geography, Topographical maps.
Talk:Dhule district

message: You are invited to work on Ahirani language wiki at  Ahirani Wikipedia in incubation . Mahitgar (talk) 04:36, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ahirani Wikipedia in incubation 

message: The Infobox Political Post templates are, like most info boxes, for placing at the top of an article about a political post, summarising the article subject.  They are not for use within other articles not about political posts.  Thanks. Escape Orbit (Talk) 16:11, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox Political Post
Talk:Ahmednagar district

message: This link:
* Ahmadnagar entry in Encyclopaedia Iranica
Was added by a Columbia University IP along with many other links to the site.  I have moved it hear in keeping with our external links guidelines so unconnected editors can evaluate its appropriateness.  Many of the websites entries are short and may not contain much more than the articles they have been added to.  However, this might be a good source even if editors do not consider it an appropriate external link.  -- SiobhanHansa 23:01, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Encyclopedia Iranica is produced by Columbia University and is a scholarly source. It should not be removed from the articles as they are pertinent sources of reference.--Zereshk 12:52, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Encyclopaedia Iranica link
Talk:Jalna district

message: Please discuss the section here. Do not fight over the changes in the article. The idea of wikipedia is not to add and develop articles about yourself or friends. Please see consensus, what wikipedia is not and conflict of interest. Prashanthns (talk) 10:22, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Famous residents 

message: Please correct your translation "ZILLA "is not an English word it should be "Our Jalna District" posted by User:213.42.23.73 in the article, under the section heading of Famous residents  
:the preceeded was deleted from the article and moved here Dbiel (Talk) 19:17, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment inserted into the article 
Talk:Nanded district

message: There is a lot of data in tabular form, just statistics. If someone would go ahead and wikify it, that would be great, If not and if no one has an objection, I will be deleting this 
SiegerKranzMeer 20:58, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: No objections to deleting the lists. If something's missing a citation it doesn't belong here, in my books. PhnomPencil (talk) 03:02, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Tabular Data

message: This page has almost no citations. I am going to go ahead and add 'citation needed' SiegerKranzMeer 20:43, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: CItations

message: Nanded is a seperate division declared by Maharashtra govt. http://www.sakaaltimes.com/2009/01/05203541/New-revenue-division-at-Nanded.html. It is carved out of the existing Aurangabad Division, though it hasn't come to existence as of date. It comprises of Nanded, Parbhani, Latur and Hingoli Districts. Please look into this matter.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Despardes7 (talk • contribs) 05:17, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why Nanded Division redirects to Nanded District? 
Talk:Parbhani district

message: Navagadh is very important temple for Jainism. As per my knowledge there is only one other temple of this kind, "Junagadh". The Navagadh also has a relegious hostel/schooling like madarsa and convent. This temple also has a tomb I think. Nevertheless, it is very important and holy for Jainism throughout the india. Proper content regarding it should be added in the article.  —usernamekiran (talk) 23:52, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Navagadh 
Talk:Chandrapur district

message: The MP of Chandrapur is Badubhau dhanorkar 194.135.167.180 (talk) 12:52, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Member of Parliament
Talk:Timeline of Turkey

message: Discussion on the Ottoman timeline page:
I proposed the merger because the timeline of the Ottoman Empire is very short, and there is a pretty unambiguous continuity between the Ottoman Empire and the Republic of Turkey. Dallyripple 20:49, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger 

message: Turkey passed to mulit-party period with 1946 election which ended with the victory of CHP. In 1950 elections, DP gained a huge victory which they would keep in 1954 and 1957 elections. Therefore, the classification of the timeline is not correct. Deliogul (talk) 20:41, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I aggree. I changed the Multiparti period table. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 11:12, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timeline has some errors 

message: The article contains irrelevant details about Ataturk/Kemalism/CHP. For example:
*October 1, 1925 - Atatürk opened the Bursa textile factory. 
*March 4, 1935 - Fourth cabinet by İsmet İnönü 
*October 27, 1930 - Greek prime minister Venizelos visited Mustafa Kemal Atatürk in Ankara.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Randam (talk • contribs) 17:53, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality 

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 14:24, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]]
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Galambosianism (2nd nomination)

message: The article has been substantially rewritten to what amounts to advertisement for "volitional science". The problem here is that Galambosianism is not volitional science, and it is not a term for it. It is doubtful that Galambos' "volitional science" is notable enough to qualify for its own article; Galambosianism as it is already teeters on the edge of unverifiable nonnotability. This is more properly mentioned at the page for Andrew Galambos. (Which, I see, has been edited to reflect this incorrectly as well.) In any case, it should not hijack the page on Galambosianism to expose volitional science. They are different things. Read the article.
I have reverted the article to its original form, that is, without mention of volitional science, which has nothing to do with the concept. "Volitional science" is a concept Galambos created and named; "Galambosianism" is a concept Galambos created but (if I'm not mistaken) didn't name as such. It is nevertheless the one most significant. JRM · Talk 14:33, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: "Volitional science"?
Talk:Bhopal district

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:55, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition 
Talk:Ujjain district

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 13:42, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition
Talk:Hoshangabad District

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 12:41, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition
Talk:Rajgarh District

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 13:24, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition
Talk:Matt Sorum

message: When I get a chance I will adding information to this stub and adding information from this biography: . Any help would be appreciated.
( Davehard 14:19, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Matt Sorum Biography

message: I removed content that had been directly copied and pasted from Allmusic. Content needs to be rewritten. Robvanvee 15:07, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Per WP:COPYPASTE 
Talk:Ratlam District

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 13:27, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition
Talk:Sehore District

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 13:32, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition