lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hitchcockella

message: This article is in dire need of expansion. I've mentioned this article on the Plants WikiProject and hope to see some major changes soon. I shall keep watch on this article and if it doesn't improve I shall mention it to an admin. DotComCairney 20:21, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: 99.9% of our articles are in dire need of expansion. I think this is may a job for DotComCairney. Hesperian 23:39, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

text: No. We don't merge articles on valid taxa. Every taxon is inherently notable, and information on them is too hard to develop if we merge to higher taxa. Hesperian 23:29, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

text: I'm more sympathetic to merging (in general) than Hesperian is but I don't see how it would work here.  Even if the subtribe Nastinae is well-accepted and different enough from other subtribes to make an article about it coherent, it has some 14 species from different parts of the world.  That would make it hard to write an article about the whole group (or so it seems to me, I don't know bamboo well enough to say specifically). Do note that whether to merge is primarily based on how long the article could or should be, not how long it is now. Kingdon (talk) 04:39, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

text: * Ok, I don't want to impose as I don't know a single thing about the subject. I suppose the article is still quite notable so it should need any thing major i.e. deletion. DotComCairney 08:08, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expand soon
Talk:Vachellia tortilis

message: This seems to be the typical "African Savannah" tree.  Something that would always remind you of this biome.
204.38.140.10 17:20, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: So, which "Tonga language" is the "Tongan" referring to?--Mr Fink (talk) 22:52, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I suspect the Pacific Island is meant, but the reference gives a 404 error, and I don't see any point in the long list of non-English names anyway, so I've removed the section. Peter coxhead (talk) 07:11, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: On the one hand, I would be surprised if it was imported to that island, but, on the other hand, a moot point now.--Mr Fink (talk) 13:46, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: On reflection, you're probably right. Peter coxhead (talk) 18:10, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Which Tonga?
Talk:Zorpox

message: I've taken another look at the Trig that Ron does. The diagrams are basic calculations of trajectory and distance using trig and simple Newtonian physics (force used, mass of projectile, angle fired at = distance traveled etc). It's that stuff you learn in high school where you have to calculate how far a ball weighing X will travel if you fire it at angle Y with Z force. I think that it's called "Exterior ballistics" and it would be within Ron's ability to calculate it even under normal circumstances.
The blacked out sections are impossible to read and so should be treated as being non existent for the purposes of cannon (if we can't tell what they are, then they aren't important to the story). They're probably just calculations. They're could even be cousin shaun's address for all we know.
perfectblue 17:42, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trig
Talk:Lac de Bret

message: Lake Bret apparently also extends up to Bugey, within France. 
Joe Gatt (talk) 23:15, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: French region
Talk:My Dinner with Jimi

message: I'm not sure this is the best of the four posters shown on .  Maybe others could chime in. Lexicon (talk) 17:23, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Changing it to the third poster which still has the tagline but a somewhat more movie poster feel. Lexicon (talk) 17:47, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If you're reusing work from other articles, which is great, fine and dandy, please remember to give credit when it's due. GFDL is not public domain and attribution is required. Thanks. --kingboyk 14:43, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Movie Poster
Talk:Yāska

message: Question: 
'Is 'Yask Gotra' in Deshasta Brahmin and the article 'Yask' related?'
Jparag2k 17:24, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

message: Looking at both articles I'd say merging was a good idea. The Yaska page really only deals with his Nirukta, not with the man himself - do we actually know anything about him anyway other than his published works? Perhaps his life would fit better under a discussion of Mimamsa philosophy? mahaabaala (talk) 18:08, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging
Talk:Ryan Dahle

message: Firstly, is it notable that Ryan Dahle co-wrote and preformed on "The Devil’s In Your Details" by Matthew Good?
Secondly, this edit looks a bit suspicious to me. I skimmed over the source and didn't see anything. Since I'm still a noob, I'm a bit reluctant to revert edits that aren't obvious vandalism. What do you think?
Youre dreaming eh? (talk) 02:54, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone removed the controversial edit, so don't worry about my second question. You're dreaming eh? 00:16, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable fact? / Remove edit?
Talk:Chaguar

message: Must remember this word for scrabble sometimes...Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:56, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:East Canonbury

message: We already have Canonbury which needs a lot more work in its own right given the history of the district. Further, I think the De Beauvoir Town 'campaign' needs some citations, certainly a move to add all N1 districts (which also includes most of Hoxton) to Islington is likely to have been little more than a PR stunt. It certainly hasn't attracted any attention over here in Hackney. Tarquin Binary 17:27, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's geographically challenged too, Gainsborough Studios are built within Hackney. I'd suggest merging this with Canonbury - there wouldn't be much to transfer, the estate agents' material is not appropriate for wiki. Kbthompson 17:59, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this piece really necessary?
Talk:Bruce Yonemoto

message: There is no reason to have two articles on Bruce Yonemoto. If the two brothers are most active together, there should just be the one article on the two of them, with subsections for individual works. If not, there should be separate articles on each one as long as each passes WP:GNG. Michitaro (talk) 02:42, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Here's an example of a show they were both in in the last five years where they are listed separately.--A21sauce (talk) 18:55, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

text: The other article has been expanded, I will add cites there. --Omotecho (talk) 21:39, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Bruce and Norman Yonemoto]] 
Talk:Jo Baer

message: Her work is in the collections of MoMA, the Tate, the Chicago Art Institute, and the Seattle Art Museum among others.
She is a well known artist, her work sells for six figures at auctions, her paintings are owned by most important museums worldwide. She has been an important minimal artist since the mid-1960s...Modernist (talk) 03:43, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: If she's important in her genre, there should be articles in books and magazines about her. Then that kind of information needs to go into the article, properly sourced and with properly-formatted footnotes. What we have now is barely a stub, and was created by a gallery looking to sell her stuff. --Orange Mike  |  Talk 04:19, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: She is as I've described, not everybody has a retrospective at the Whitney Museum. I'll add references over time...Modernist (talk) 04:25, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: She is undoubtedly notable, but yes more refs are needed. Johnbod (talk) 09:47, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Jo Baer

message: They are excessive...Modernist (talk) 15:39, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The article is referenced: Johnbod sums it up well in his edit summery. I don't think tags are needed at this time. If the offending editors have not been warned, they should be reminded of COI issues. Otherwise, we can move on. freshacconci talktalk 15:51, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Tags

message: This article has been tagged as lacking encyclopedic tone since 2017. Not much has changed since then. However, I failed to see the issue in the article, and will remove the tag. The article is detailed and comprehensive, but indeed suited for an encyclopedia. If anyone wants to add back the tag, please state why, and which sections of the article bothered you. Mateussf (talk) 00:34, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tone
Talk:Average wholesale price

message: I saw that this article has not citing, but I had previously read the same text from this article: http://www.nhpf.org/pdfs_ib/IB775_AWP_6-7-02.pdf.
I am new to Wikipedia and do not know how to correct the article. I figure if I leave the citation address, someone who knows could help out and fix the main article.
Thanks —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Westont (talk • contribs) 17:32, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That works well; thanks. I've added it to the article. Part Deux 19:13, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: The obvious problem with the car "sticker price" analogy is that the cars "sticker price" is a retail price whereas AWP is a wholesale price representation. This is a bad analogy created and propagated by those with an incorrect understanding of the real economics involved. This analogy should be abandoned. --156Wiki (talk) 19:09, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  AWP and Sticker Price
Talk:Gaffney High School

message: Please help to expand this page in the future.--DvDknight 17:32, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I suggest there is a Conflict of interest. "All text created in the Wikipedia main namespace is subject to rules covering criteria for articles (what Wikipedia is not); encyclopedic quality (attribution); editorial approach (neutral point of view); as well as the Wikipedia copyright policy. All editors are expected to stick closely to these policies when creating and evaluating material." Rjgodoy 14:11, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion 

message: This is a high school, not a college. You can't have an encyclopedic definition of this high school. There is no way a high school will be in the encyclopedia. Please get it right or neck hard. "Neck Hard" is a term that Gaffney High School created to show when something someone has done is stupid. Thanks and have a nice day.--DvDknight 16:27, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The page have ways of being encyclopedic (please read the notability criteria for organizations and companies, as well as the guideline about conflict of interest, or take a look on other high school articles). If you consider it is unencyclopedic, you may propose it for deletion. (btw, I have never said it were a college.)
Rjgodoy 17:40, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Please convert these lists into paragraphs. Wikipedia is not a stats almanac. –Pomte 14:16, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  GET IT RIGHT.......OR NECK HARD 

message: In my opinion the Introduction and Mission are right... Some of the Facts may be included as prose / infobox. One or two additional paragraphs should be included. The result will be a stub that may be expanded later according Wikipedia policies. I said the article could be proposed for deletion because one of its main contributors considers all of its content is unencyclopedic, which I don't agree. I cannot contribute with the article because I dont know about Gaffney High School, I am only asessing its quality. Rjgodoy 20:02, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion? 

message: Please spell out the "DELC" acronym. E.g., you could say, "The Media Center has 2 media specialists and 1 Distance Education Learning Center coordinator" (if that is what it means). The acronym itself might be too limited, geographically (a quick web search suggests to me that it might be specific to South Carolina), to be worth including. If you believe that it's important, however, try saying, "... and 1 Distance Education Learning Center (DELC) coordinator" or "... and 1 DELC (Distance Education Learning Center) coordinator."  --Rich Janis 09:50, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  DELC Coordinator 

message: :Image:GaffneySCPeachoidAtNight.jpg ("The 'Peachoid' a couple of miles away from Gaffney High School")
is not relevant to the content of this article, which is about a specific building/institution. Rjgodoy 02:39, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Peachoid]]
Talk:Marija Šerifović

message: There have been claims by media in Britain and some other countries, that the winning song was actually stolen from an old Albanian song an that an ivestigation has been started. There is really great similarity, as far as the music is concerned, but in my opinion, a song does not consist only of music. What about the lyrics? Can anybody tell, which one of the songs is really older, maybe it is vice versa...
The Albanian song :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4NvjII8_8AM
:First, 'Ndarja' isn't an "old Albanian song". It is a ballad composed for Albanian female pop-singer Soni Malaj by Macedonian author Mariano Filipovski 2 years ago. Second, Filipovski himself discarded the amateur charges of Albanian press and stated for Macedonian press that Molitva and 'Ndarja' aren't at all the same song. Link (in Macedonian): http://www.idividi.com.mk/zabava/Showbiz/384398/index.html 212.200.56.13 21:15, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Usually, there's plagiarization accusations for winning songs. I just read today that The Ark's song The Worrying Kind was accused of plagiarizing David Bowie's song Quicksand. I don't think these accusations are important, unless the European Broadcasting Union or some other major organization would claim the song as a plagiarization. I think such accusations are inevitable, considering so many songs have been written, before, and a lot of the songwriting in the contest is rather traditional. Apparently, carbon copies are not tolerated, but the tolerance for near copies seem pretty high. 惑乱 分からん * \)/ (\ (< \) (2 /) /)/ * 09:31, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Song Stolen? 

message: I've replaced the photo with the nicer one. Vanjagenije 12:03, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Uh, what you've actually done is to replace a free-to-use photo with a copyrighted one - a big no-no for articles about living people. The article's blocked so I can't change it back - please could someone else do so? Thanks, 86.152.203.212 14:22, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --Zzzzzzzzzz 00:58, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo 

message: Why is Maria's political orientation considered a contraversy? She can support whatever political party she wants, are we living in fascism where certain political views are forbidden?? --24.150.77.3 (talk) 17:12, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The Radical Party is not known for their tolerance period. Given the politics and actions of both the party and its blood-stained founder, focusing on its opinion "LGTB rights" is pretty misguided. Str1977 (talk) 21:47, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversies?
Talk:Lava Hay

message: While I'm not the person who placed the hangon tag, I'm adding a rationale here because the person who did place the tag hasn't done so yet. This is a band that meets several criteria of WP:MUSIC, including #2 (has had a charted single or album on any national music chart), #5 (Has released two or more albums on a major label or one of the more important indie labels), #1 (although as a pre-Internet era band, the majority of those sources are in print magazines rather than on the web, and thus require digging into library archives...note also that reliable sourcing policy permits sources in any medium, not just web ones), and possibly #3 (has had a record certified gold or higher in at least one country), though I'd have to dig into the archives to confirm or retract that one. 
Additionally, I'd note that while it isn't actually spelled out in WP:MUSIC, the longstanding if unofficial practice for musical artists has always been that if an artist has a non-empty profile at allmusic.com, then they're at the very least not speediable. And this band does indeed have a non-empty AMG profile.
There's simply no basis for even claiming that the band isn't notable at all. Take it from someone who was there at the time, they were one of the most famous Canadian bands around in their era. Bearcat (talk) 20:17, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I had to make sure I had all my ducks in a row, since I don't actually know them :P - BalthCat (talk) 20:23, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No worries...lol 20:27, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Some of the information regarding their charting(s) can be found here, although I don't have the time or the musical knowledge to sort it out, I am going to remove the speedy deletion tag though.  --kelapstick (talk) 20:38, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speedy 

message: This concerns the Michele Gould and Suzanne Little articles as well.  I've just done some preliminary digging and it appears that these articles do are sufficiently notable to not qualify as  speedy-delete.  Lava Hay have international google news results, they have albums released on Polydor/Polygram, albums released on Nettwerk - a notable CAnadian independent label - and were featured on their 10th Anniversary retrospective, both women married members of The Grapes of Wrath, and the article claims collaborations with the group as well.  I believe the women are notable enough that redirecting them to their husbands' articles would be disrespectful, and that either independently, or as redirects too Lava Hay they may fit notability on their own merits.  - BalthCat (talk) 20:20, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've gone ahead and added multiple sources to the Suzanne Little article. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 22:00, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hangon!
Talk:Hohenbergia

message: I'm trying to find a reference to clarify this vague point about the Prince of Württemburg called Hohenberg.  But in the meantime, even though the source for the statement spells it with one "t" I've taken the liberty of correcting the spelling of Württemburg.   140.147.236.194 (talk) 15:09, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Württemburg
Talk:Virgin CrossCountry

message: I've begun a temporary Virgin Cross Country article in my userspace at User:RFBailey/VXC, to replace this one, now that the franchise no longer operates.  It's nowhere near ready yet, but any thoughts would be appreciated.  --RFBailey 16:17, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: New article
Talk:Oryza

message: The article states that there are "seven to twenty species" without providing a reference. German Wikipedia refer to Shou-liang Chen, De-Zhu Li, Guanghua Zhu, Zhenlan Wu, Sheng-lian Lu, Liang Liu, Zheng-ping Wang, Bi-xing Sun, Zheng-de Zhu, Nianhe Xia, Liang-zhi Jia, Zhenhua Guo, Wenli Chen, Xiang Chen, Yang Guangyao, Sylvia M. Phillips, Chris Stapleton, Robert J. Soreng, Susan G. Aiken, Nikolai N. Tzvelev, Paul M. Peterson, Stephen A. Renvoize, Marina V. Olonova & Klaus Ammann: Poaceae' in der Flora of China, Volume 22, S. 182 ff., Online, which mention 24 species.
-- 92.230.229.161 (talk) 01:38, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of Species 

message: add to the list, oryza nivara, or red rice 49.0.3.142 (talk) 12:25, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oryza nivara
Talk:Hordeum

message: Hi, I have a question about the classification of  Hordeum genus.  Some publications indicated that the Hordeum comprises about 33 species (Blattner, F.R. 2009, Breeding Sci 59:471–480.), but I can see 39 Hordeum species from Wikipedia. I wonder how did you define the new species and which article we can cite for this number? Dongying2021 (talk) 16:39, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  question about Hordeum species
Talk:ITK (gene)

message: This page will be a template for a bot we are planning on writing to populate all genes with information curated from public sources.  Please feel free to make changes here or to comment on Wikipedia:WikiProject Molecular and Cellular Biology/Proposals.  Also, anyone know how to embed the second table in the first? AndrewGNF 17:47, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: never mind, figured out how to next tables, then decided to unnest them AndrewGNF 18:19, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Made all the changes except expanding the width of the GO section since there is an EC number in there too, although for ITK not used. David D. (Talk) 08:50, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, followed up on these changes on Template_talk:GNF_Protein_box.  AndrewGNF 17:23, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Good idea, added it to the specs.  Any intelligent ways to determine what should be wikilinked?  We could parse through every word and check for the existence of a WP page (although that might be difficult given the limitations on bot reads).  Or we could cross reference against some "preferred library" (say, the list of all gene names and symbols, and all MCB articles).  Or, we could defer the wikilinking to one of the bots that is dedicated to this process.  Anyway, we'll keep it under consideration.  If anyone has any thoughts on the best way to do this, we'd love to hear them...  AndrewGNF 18:14, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sir Edward Petre, 3rd Baronet

message: Captain Bedloe originally accused "two Jesuits" called Le Fevre and Petre of murdering Godfey at Somerset House. The accusation them moved on to its eventual victims, Greene, Berry & Hill.--Streona (talk) 22:33, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sir Edmondbury Godfrey
Talk:Esparto

message: I found a book review in Times Online  which states:
« it is surprising to learn, the great majority of pre-war British books were manufactured from esparto grass, from French North Africa, and the instant absence of superior esparto (272,000 tons were imported in 1939) meant that paper-makers had to use instead lower-quality domestic oat, wheat and barley straw, as well as salvage from rags and waste paper. »
The reference is: Valerie Holman "PRINT FOR VICTORY -- Book publishing in England 1939-1945", 304pp.British Library. £30. 978 0 7123 5001 3.
I did not feel I could insert this in the article as it is a second-hand reference, but still felt it had to be kept handy.
Rdavout (talk) 13:15, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  UK pre-war use of esparto for paper
Talk:Nuclear Death

message: Nuclear Death are indeed a notable band, having generated press and interest at the time that they were active. They were an early grindcore band and would have been notable even without a female vocalist. I recommend taking this article off of the "articles for deletion" list and instead putting it into the ICU. If the article was about a band that had no media exposure  at the time it was activeand no reference in the context of similar bands, then deletion would be appropriate but this is not the case. With references and a bit of improvement in the NPOV tone, it will be fine. A lizard (talk) 16:26, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Added two sources for notability: Decibel magazine and Allmusic. Added references where appropriate. The article is hardly perfect as it stands but it is not suitable for deletion and unless and until said references are proven to be inappropriate, the deletion tag should be removed. A lizard (talk) 17:26, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: ICU, Not Deletion
Talk:Bambusoideae

message: and it doesn not point to bamboo which at least describes them a bit.  Wikiskimmer 10:25, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  this wiki does not describe what characterises bambusoideae! 

message: seems like it should be mentioned, but I don't know the (sub)tribe--Wcoole (talk) 23:03, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pleioblastus
Talk:Alopecurus

message: What is the difference between Alopecurus and Hordeum murinum ? rkmlai (talk) 18:05, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  question asked 
Talk:Calamagrostis

message: It's mentioned in the main article body. Equinox ◑ 18:55, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is "Calamagrostis brachytricha" not in the species list?