lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Salian dynasty

message: This is a bad page.  Fr. Jonat, Salian is an adjective that can refer to many things in the middle ages -- including the Salian Franks!  I'm not even sure we call Conrad's dynasty Salian -- it may be Salic, or something else in English.  Please be more responsible in creating pages. JHK
--
For Fr. JHK
On the Holy Roman Empire page is stated Salian dynasty. I included the word dynasty in the link, even through the other dynasties are linked only under the names such as Habsburg etc.  Please also read the text on Conrad II .ThanksHJ
-----------
I've never heard this dynasty called Frankish before in English.  I think that's in error. Srnec 05:32, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was move. Haukur 19:45, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: I'm convinced the listing Werner V Count of Worms is someone else entirely. Different wives altogether. Can someone confirm? I've seen Kunigunde and Hicha of Swabia listed as the ancestresses of the tree. 70.77.38.177 (talk) 09:47, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Werner of Worms
Talk:Social dynamics

message: This section needs names, dates, books, main theories (+date), of those who developed this branch of study.  Does anyone know any of these?--Sadi Carnot 14:00, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  History section needed 

message: The article reads like an essay on someone's view of social dynamics.  What it should be is an overview of what important authors or experts in the field have said. For example, a theory is presented of the applicability of transmission functions to society.  It isn't a self-evident fact that these can be applied; therefore it should be stated who holds this theory, and where it has been presented.  Similarly for other points in the article. GMcGath 00:06, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality 

message: I am no expert on this subject. I was looking for social dynamics at my city library today with no luck, so perused wikipedia. Despite my ignorance on the subject (I understood it to be about social interaction), I did receive a bachelor's in Sociology. As I remember, Sociology has little to do with natural science. There is plenty of math and systemics involved though (some might call it statistics). As far as being a "fence-straddler" of physics and philosophy, I am unable to grasp the connection. True, Social Theory has a deep philosophical vein. Where does Physics enter the equation though? If social dynamics is the next great thing in the evolution of Sociology, I am not convinced by this essay. The author might also want to edit his or her grammar.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dogday77 (talk • contribs) 08:27, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fact or Fiction? 
Talk:Scientific misconduct

message: I've written a (provocative) article about scientific fraud & misconduct (see https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01562601/document). It is a collection of the most common forms of fraud and misconduct (with references to specific cases). Since I'm the author, I cannot add it to the references but I think it might be worth a look by some wikipedians to see if it relevant or not.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nicolas P. Rougier (talk • contribs) 17:35, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ten Simple Rules for Scientific Fraud & Misconduct 

message: Someone please review  and tell me if you think it looks like a oblique threat or not, please. "学問ポリス" means "academic police." Ping me back, please. EllenCT (talk) 01:13, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I am "学問ポリス." I thought it is appropriate to recognize the evolution of fraud-busters in the "See also" section of Bik, who may be the best and ultimate fraud-buster on the earth. I picked up the best historical fraud-busters before Bik. Thanks. --学問ポリス (talk) 16:11, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for the explanation. I was concerned that you were trying to imply such people get sued often, which I am sure is true but I couldn't discern the nuance and motivation. Those narratives would be more appropriate in Scientific misconduct incidents. EllenCT (talk) 02:27, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unusual edit
Talk:Simon & Garfunkel

message: When thiS article says that the duo were reunited several times and "most famously in 1981", should it add that they have reunited in the zeroes? Vorbee (talk) 10:22, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: That's already covered in the article. Popcornduff (talk) 10:34, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Reunited

message: To the edit-warring anonymous editor who won't communicate: we shouldn't link Ireland. Please read WP:OVERLINK. Popcornduff (talk) 20:18, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overlinking
Talk:Religious text/Archive 1

message: From the article:
:Even non-believers often capitalize the names of sacred scriptures as a mark of respect or of tradition.
Aren't names normally capitalized, regardless of sacredness, respect, or tradition?   It might be better to say that non-believers occasionally decapitalize names as a mark of deliberate disrespect, if that is what is being alluded to [I know similar happens with "God" used as a proper name.] —Muke Tever 06:46, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  dog bites man 

message: In this edit, User:Dbachmann removed (obviously in good faith) a number of texts, stating that "a Religious text is not the same as a Sacred text". While that is true, religious text redirects here, so I think either they should be returned (possibly in a separate list) or a full article on religious texts chould be made. Comments? Nikola 12:15, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Content removal
Talk:Single-occupancy vehicle

message: I wrote this as a State employee and my boss says that it is fine to release it under the FDL. The copyright on the report mentioned is BSD-like without the need to include the copyright notice. maveric149
: Which state? I have a feeling that SOV is a legal term which may differ slightly between different administrations. For example, you don't mention motorcycles or motorscooters, although they are perhaps the most efficient motorized single occupant vehicles. --IanOsgood (talk) 02:49, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Talk:On the Origin of Species

message: Sub-species play a critical role in long-term evolutionary dynamics and in future evolution of species.
*https://eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2020-03/sjcu-ood031620.php
*https://phys.org/news/2020-03-darwin-evolution-theories-cambridge.html
X1\ (talk) 07:20, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Just add this one as well https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2019.2702 2A00:1FA0:8CF:BC1C:E032:5418:CC1B:AE5D (talk) 13:34, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  a subspecies theory proven, add here or? 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Origin of the species. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 28#Origin of the species until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 10:07, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Origin of the species" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :TOoS. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 28#TOoS until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 10:09, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "TOoS" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Talk radio

message: In the very early 1950's Alan Courtney, who had a long career in New York radio, created in Miami. Florida "The Alan Courtney Open-Phone Forum" which for many years dominated late night radio and enjoyed extraordinarily high ratings. Courtney invited on-air listener comment, employing a 30-second delay system to screen out profanity, and espoused a political Conservatism and anti-Communism which presaged the candidacies of Barry Goldwater and Ronald Reagan. Alan Courtney did not live to see the fall of the Berlin Wall or the acknowledged collapse of the Soviet. His program reached to Cuba and was a major concern of the castro government. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sleplaw@comcast.net (talk • contribs) 20:36, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Talk Radio: the early days 

message: Call screener redirects here but is not found in the article. --72.211.147.156 (talk) 04:03, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This was fixed in December 2013. JustinTime55 (talk) 12:59, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Call screener 
Talk:Technology

message: Technology futures studies is an intriguing and multifaceted field that merges the analytical rigor of science and technology with the creative foresight of speculative fiction. It's a realm where futurists, technologists, and thinkers converge to explore the myriad possibilities that lie ahead, venturing beyond the current horizons of technological development. In this space, the future of artificial intelligence, biotechnology, nanotechnology, and other emerging technologies are not just predictions but canvases for imaginative yet plausible scenarios. The essence of technology futures studies lies in its ability to not only forecast potential technological advancements but also to contemplate their societal, ethical, and environmental implications. By weaving together strands of current scientific understanding and trends with visionary ideas, it crafts narratives that challenge our perceptions and prepare us for a world where the boundaries of what is possible are continually expanding. This interdisciplinary approach serves as a beacon, guiding policymakers, industry leaders, and the public in navigating the uncharted waters of our technological future. Blogzify12 (talk) 07:46, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Liu1126 (talk) 11:06, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 26 December 2023 

message: The redirect تکنولوژی has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Duckmather (talk) 23:17, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:تکنولوژی]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: — Assignment last updated by Momlife5 (talk) 15:52, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Gender and Technoculture 320-03

message: Technology 2409:40D4:107D:2AE7:8000:0:0:0 (talk) 16:09, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Technology short under 150 words 

message: The redirect Virtual technology has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Duckmather (talk) 04:02, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Virtual technology]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:The Beatles

message: other act touring with the Beatles 68.69.80.181 (talk) 17:28, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Does not seem to have been a notable musician. Do you have any source(s)? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 12:07, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dee Millar  

message: It may be noteworthy that BAFTA and Academy Award winner Sam Mendes is slated to direct four biopics of The Beatles, one for each member, all due to be released in 2027. Paul, Ringo, Yoko, and Olivia seem to have greenlighted the deal already. Sources: Guardian, Variety, BBC. --2003:DA:CF4E:6314:B881:443:2A4E:E651 (talk) 18:06, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Upcoming biopics 

message: Change "They briefly called themselves the Blackjacks, before changing their name to the Quarrymen after discovering that another local group were already using the name." to "They were called The Quarrymen, a reference to their school song "Quarry men old before our birth." Coleypoleyhair (talk) 03:23, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: per consensus generated in above section. Courtesy pings to , , and . —Sirdog (talk) 05:19, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 4 April 2024
Talk:The Communist Manifesto

message: It sure seems to be getting vandalized a lot — I reverted it to a non-vandalized version, and less than three minutes later, it was vandalized again.
Seane2017 (talk) 17:07, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stronger edit protections? 

message: Can I do this as a book report in 7th grade  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.43.225.47 (talk) 19:40, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello. Yes, you can do a book report on the Communist Manifesto. Be sure to use the sources as citations, and double check what is mentioned in the article with those sources. Do not cite the actual wiki article, but those sources (references and footnotes) for best results. -- HafizHanif (talk) 03:43, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please answer  

message: Because the original title is "Manifest der Kommunistischen Partei" the correct translation is "Manifesto of the Communist Party".
So the wiki article should be moved to , and refer to the book as Manifesto of the Communist Party.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Victory1323 (talk • contribs) 
:We go by the WP:COMMONAME, not literal translations. In English, The Communist Manifesto is the most familiar version of the title and that's what we go with. Any more precise translations can be included in the article body. Also, please sign your posts with for tildes (~). freshacconci (✉) 14:49, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wiki title to original title 

message: "In this sense, the theory of the Communists may be summed up in the single sentence: Abolition of private property."
Source: https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/ch02.htm
This is the easiest, simplest explanation of the Communist Manifesto, and the quote comes from the Communist Manifesto itself. This quote should be cited in the introduction to the article.
Baxter329 (talk) 18:04, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia prefers neutral, third-party scholarly sources to primary sources. In other words, we shouldn't be quoting the Communist Manifesto to explain what the Communist Manifesto is about; that would be a bit circular.—indopug (talk) 06:52, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The article should include this quote in the introduction 

message: I think the Legacy section would be better split into a separate criticism section for the second paragraph. I was going to just do this, but I figured this page is watched like hawks, so I felt it prudent to solicit additional opinions. Of course, this will probably draw in scores of hostile edits, but I think its important to separate the general legacy from contemporary and modern criticism. Metallurgist (talk) 20:21, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legacy
Talk:The Terminator

message: Has Terminator got enough hallmarks to be defined as a neo-noir film?Internet Informant (talk) 05:29, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The Neo-noir article makes no mention of Terminator (or James Cameron), but does include a See Also to Tech-noir.  If you can find sources to support the inclusion, then yay, but as it stands there's nothing to justify the genre.  Chaheel Riens (talk) 05:43, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Tech-noir is the name of the discotheque in the film. Drsruli (talk) 07:04, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neo Noir 

message: First instance of "Come with me if you want to live." Drsruli (talk) 07:04, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Famous Lines
Talk:TSR

message: Can someone rewrite a more neutral history of TSR games? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rmhermen (talk • contribs) 20:56, 1 August 2001 (UTC)

message: It is weird to me that the D&D related TSR is last... surely it is what a majority of people mean when they search Wikipedia for TSR.  After all, the company went by it's initials -- I remember in pre-internet days it was almost impossible to figure out what the letters even stood for.  --75.205.120.213 (talk) 02:03, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: synonymous with D&D
Talk:Tim Berners-Lee

message: The phrase the invention of the World Wide Web was ranked number one, with the entry stating, "The fastest growing communications medium of all time, the Internet has changed the shape of modern life forever. We can connect with each other instantly, all over the world." seems to confuse the Internet and the WWW.  Supposing the source of the quote does not, the sentence should be rephrased to show that it does not. 2.247.243.252 (talk) 07:34, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The reason is because it used to be called the World Wide Web. --The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 11:07, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The World Wide Web is still distinct from the Internet at large. For example, E-mail, which was already well-established by the 1980s, is part of the Internet but not of the Web. --Florian Blaschke (talk) 22:50, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Internet and World-Wide Web 

message: These are being managed by non-websites today to work 100% against Tim Berners-Lee's vision. This article should have a section on hyperlinks, with him as the author, as per the article Hyperlink. It takes me to link that article to him in 2023? Well, apparently it's necessary. Henrik Erlandsson 22:48, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hyperlinks 

message: Hello, as Robert Cailliau was the source of pre-www work, and collaborated with TimBL on the "discovery" of the WWW, his name should be mentionned in the introduction. 2A02:1810:2E32:4700:18E1:414C:EEE9:B88D (talk) 09:04, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree. This article is about Berners-Lee, not about the WWW. It would be unnecessary detail in the opening of an article about a person to start listing out all their collaborators. MarcGarver (talk) 13:45, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical correction: Robert Cailliau 

message: he invented one piece 41.97.140.28 (talk) 15:30, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  One piece 

message: Quoting from the article 'His paternal grandmother was a Canadian woman' perhaps being Canadian is notable, but who considers it notable that his grandmother was a woman?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.136.196.48 (talk) 21:47, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Talking Heads

message: What is meant here:
How can a band be "into hiatus" and "[tour] the United States and Europe"? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 23:12, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Pigsonthewing I read this as a recording hiatus, I've updated the article to specify this. grungaloo (talk) 18:16, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction
Talk:Tetris

message: according to several news articles quoting Henk Rogers (one of the founders and President of the Tetris Company), the mobile version of Tetris has over 425 million paid sales (not counting free downloads) that would make it the best selling game in history (at leas this version of the game), I don't know if anybody else has been able to find more sources.
here are some links about the interview:
https://www.gamesindustry.biz/tetris-now-at-425-million-paid-mobile-downloads
https://venturebeat.com/games/mr-tetris-explains-why-the-puzzle-game-is-still-popular-after-three-decades-interview/
Zettus (talk) 14:33, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: My question is whether that is for the current mobile app or all mobile versions combined, many of which have been discontinued and no longer function (like Tetris (Electronic Arts)). If the latter, then I wonder if it's really a valid comparison. oknazevad (talk) 16:57, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tetris Mobile sales 

message: Recently the original creation date listed in the article was changed from 1984 to the much more likely 1985. While I believe that this was a correct change, I also think that the controversy over the creation date should be mentioned in the article, perhaps even in its own subheading. The company that owns the game and several high profile sources claiming a different creation date than the one listed in the article is significant and notable, and should be mentioned in the article. Leaflemon (talk) 03:35, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't disagree with your thoughts on the matter. If you want to try to hash up a paragraph here to describe the situation feel free. I'll gladly take a look. oknazevad (talk) 03:51, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

text: Yes, that seems like a good idea. I'm the one who changed it from 84 to 85. The only reason I didn't add a paragraph in the article is because there's no real easy way to source it, and the leading theory for the reason TTC gives an incorrect date (while almost certainly true) is speculative. Explodingcreepsr (talk) 07:12, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The official Tetris website lists the launch date as 1984: https://tetris.com/history-of-tetris GraemeCod (talk) 08:04, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: And that claim is what is disputed. Please familiarize yourself with the sources already included before reposting them. oknazevad (talk) 08:34, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I am simply responding to what has been said above: the dispute can be referenced, with the original founder and now owner of the rights to Tetris claiming the game was designed in 1984 (and first played on 6 June 1984 to be precise) - and then link to his website to show this claim; whereas public and commercial references to the development of game indicate a 1985 launch date. GraemeCod (talk) 09:44, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion of the original creation date in the article 

message: First human to beat Tetris game to hard crash (at level 157) which only AI could do thus far:
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-67871775
94.21.160.159 (talk) 22:15, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tetris BSOD on BBC