Talk:Carnival Fascination

message: :Image:Fascination04 RF.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 05:02, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Fascination04 RF.jpg

message: The ship's name has been changed written the articles name be changed as well? MAXMcow (talk) 23:07, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: A highly-premature page move in my view, and directly contrary to NC-SHIP: .  She will have to function as a hotel ship for some considerable time (if she ever does) before that becomes better-known than Carnival Fascination. In the meantime, it should be reverted. Davidships (talk) 03:15, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

text: The ball is no longer crystal, and I propose returning this article to the ship's best-known name, Carnival Fascination, as soon as scrappiing is confirmed.Davidships (talk) 21:56, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Now confirmed. Any views?  Davidships (talk) 15:29, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  Agreed. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 16:08, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Megan B.... It’s all coming to me till the end of time 20:23, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Century Harmony →  – Move over redirect - previous move was premature, and now redundant as ship now being scrapped. This cruiseship has only been in active service as Fascination and Carnival Fascination, of which the latter best meets WP:COMMONNAME policy, as well as guidance "An article about a ship that changed name or nationality should be placed at the best-known name" WP:SHIPNAME. Davidships (talk) 16:13, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 20 February 2022 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:23, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion