Talk:Ministry of foreign affairs

message: Is "Foreign minister" still considered being political correct since "foreign" has an negative connotation? 
Should be discussed in the article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.246.7.9 (talk) 21:40, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  political correctness? 

message: Please hight light the process 37.111.140.253 (talk) 01:29, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Role of Parliament in foreign Policy making 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved to lowercase Ministry of foreign affairs (along with the other three). While there are (disputed) arguments that this is a proper name, and that this is actually a dab page in disguise (not disputed), a majority of posters agree that the article is about the general concept. Plus, there's the precedent at Talk:Ministry_of_Defence#Requested_move_5_February_2021.   No such user (talk) 11:21, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Ministry of Foreign Affairs →  – article is about the general concept Primergrey (talk) 07:53, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Politics has been notified of this discussion. UtherSRG (talk) 12:20, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Lists has been notified of this discussion. UtherSRG (talk) 12:20, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Countries has been notified of this discussion. UtherSRG (talk) 12:20, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject International relations has been notified of this discussion. UtherSRG (talk) 12:20, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

text: Oppose Proper name. – robertsky (talk) 21:16, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: This is about all ministries of foreign affairs. Surely the idea of a ministry of foreign affairs isn't a proper name. Primergrey (talk) 21:45, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: This page also functions as dab page for all similarly named organisations. I would not oppose to other names that downcases it, i.e. List of foreign ministries, etc. – robertsky (talk) 02:43, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

text: Also, @Primergrey, I think it is rather bad form to split each ministry into separate RMs and force commentators to discover what other pages are being proposed to move, and repeat the same arguments elsewhere, forcing discussion to be fragmented and scattered across multiple pages. It is even poorer form not to even link to the other RMs here. The RMs should have been consolidated into one multiple-move request.  If possible, I'd like to request that all the individual RMs be closed and for @Primergrey reformulate his RM request as a multi-page move. Walrasiad (talk) 06:12, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 16 February 2023 

message: The redirect Foreign Secretaries has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 21:55, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Foreign Secretaries]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]