Talk:Biomechanics

message: I think that the entry for biomechanics needs to be substantially broadened. Currently, there is a lot of interesting information, but it seems relly human-centric. The field has practitioners working on plants, on insect flight, on marine filter feeders in addition to the large contingent working on human locomotion and fluid systems. I agree with the suggestion that it needs a more general introduction that can encompass these things, and the rest can be subdivided. 
mooseo 21:55, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broaden the entry 

message: Additional information on Biotribology in relation to joint replacements. I am considering adding more to this article in relation to tribology to study the wear on artificial joints. Some information is already included, but I believe it could be expanded to be more informative. Any thoughts on this? Magggey (talk) 00:39, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Addition 

message: I just added the cleanup template to the article. It has some good stuff, but a lot of the sections belong as articles (and many already are). This article should focus on the core of "Biomechanics" and let other articles talk about continuum mechanics or non-Newtonian fluids. —Ben FrantzDale 01:42, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: Should something be added about "biomechanical" often referring to creatures that are a combination of organic and mechanical in science fiction? urutapu 05:39, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Biomechanics" in fiction 

message: "Biomechanics is the research and analysis of man and living organisms "
removed vulgarities
--Venny85 18:33, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Somebody messed around with the page 

message: There is no page for that experimental theatrical concept. It needs an article created about it and should be added to the disambiguation page. 216.167.172.78 (talk) 06:57, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meyerhold's Biomechanics (Theatre) 

message: Hi all, I'm trying to start a Wikiproject to cover Organismal Biomechanics, and I was wondering if anyone else would be interested?  Articles such as animal locomotion. gait, muscle, and similar would be our targets.  See my userpage for a list of what I'm planning to work on, including some truly awful articles in desperate need of attention.  See proposal page at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Council/Proposals#Wikiproject_Organismal_Biomechanics.  I'll keep anyone who signs up updated via their userpages until I get a project page made.  Help of all kinds is appreciated, from brain dumps to wikifying, grammar and dealing with references. Mokele (talk) 01:38, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed project of interest - organismal biomechanics 

message: I was just thinking, should there be a section on this page for journals & societies that frequently publish biomechanics?  Some are obvious from the name, like the Journal of Biomechanics, but others are less so - Journal of Experimental Biology and Integrative & Comparative Biology both publish a lot of comparative biomech stuff. Mokele (talk) 16:51, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section on journals & societies? 

message: Seems the article is remiss not to mention Bert Fung's contribution to the field. I would consider him  a pioneer. GetAgrippa (talk) 03:05, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: You're welcome to include this information in the article! --Rudolf Hellmuth (talk) 08:49, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: History

message: The article says that Aristotle wrote De Motu Animalium, or On the Motion of Animals. His article makes no mention of this book title in either language; additionally, the title De Motu Animalium is Latin, not Greek, and Aristotle's no Roman. Was this Latin title later added/associated with it by a Roman, or does this need to be changed? I don't know the answer myself. Raien (talk) 05:47, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Antiquity section

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Biomechanics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130808074008/http://www.asbweb.org/html/biomechanics/genealogy/genealogy.htm to http://www.asbweb.org/html/biomechanics/genealogy/genealogy.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100917074516/http://asbweb.org/html/biomechanics/genealogy/genealogy.htm to http://www.asbweb.org/html/biomechanics/genealogy/genealogy.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130808074008/http://www.asbweb.org/html/biomechanics/genealogy/genealogy.htm to http://www.asbweb.org/html/biomechanics/genealogy/genealogy.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:36, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This page has sever problems, with overlong prose and strangely worded writing. It sounds copy-pasted from a student essay.
Examples:
In 2022, computational mechanics goes far beyond pure mechanics, and involves other physical actions: chemistry, heat and mass transfer, electric and magnetic stimuli and many others.
...
The next major biomechanic would not be around until 1452, with the birth of Leonardo da Vinci. Da Vinci was an artist and mechanic and engineer. He contributed to mechanics and military and civil engineering projects. He had a great understanding of science and mechanics and studied anatomy in a mechanics context. He analyzed muscle forces and movements and studied joint functions.
...
The next major bio-mechanic, Giovanni Alfonso Borelli, embraced Descartes' mechanical philosophy and studied walking, running, jumping, the flight of birds, the swimming of fish, and even the piston action of the heart within a mechanical framework
There's too many examples, and the page repeats itself and largely sounds like a story. The concept of what biomechanics is is also repeated several times. If someone could clean up the article that would be helpful. Largely it just needs to be more clear and concise. Language Boi (talk) 18:22, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Also: This is just my opinion, not an objective statement. Take this comment lightlyLanguage Boi (talk) 18:23, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

text: @Language Boi I agree, I read on the Galileo section, it wrote so much about how he got into biomechanics, but it is not a page on biography, it should be about biomechanics instead. Wargreymon2022 (talk) 11:51, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strang writing