Talk:Life-cycle hypothesis

message: Should be merged with Life-cycle Income Hypothesis.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.237.222.120 (talk) 16:53, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger 

message: Because of new information available via Google Ngram(see linked chart)https://books.google.com/ngrams/interactive_chart?content=life+cycle%2Clifecycle%2C%5Blife-cycle%5D&case_insensitive=on&year_start=1800&year_end=2008&corpus=15&smoothing=3, and because of not linked references within the page, I am recommending that the earlier move to the hyphenated version was incorrect and inconsistent with published works. This is only one of 2 out of 9 pages on the disambiguation page which is hyphenated.  About the Google chart, the hyphenated version is not even listed in print publications scanned though 2008, only the fully linked and the separate words. These two types may if current trending on those lines is consistent, meet in about 80 years. Occurrences of the separate form still out number the linked form 5.2:1.3 . RowanHawkins (talk) 17:21, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion, Revert move based on publication data and linked not cited references within the document showing proper use 

message: This article has been found to be edited by students of the Wikipedia:India Education Program project as part of their (still ongoing) course-work. Unfortunately, many of the edits in this program so far have been identified as plain copy-jobs from books and online resources and therefore had to be reverted. See the India Education Program talk page for details. In order to maintain the WP standards and policies, let's all have a careful eye on this and other related articles to ensure that no material violating copyrights remains in here. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 12:30, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Look out for possible copyright violations in this article 

message: An image used in this article, File:The Life-Cycle Consumption Function.JPG, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 13:44, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:The Life-Cycle Consumption Function.JPG Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: Increasingly, the life-cycle hypothesis by Modigliani and Brumberg and the permanent income hypothesis advanced by Friedman are seen as part of the same framework. Would it be possible to merge the two or at least link the two articles up? Benuel (talk) 23:20, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changing article to reflect a joint-framework with the permanent income hypothesis 

message: tmThe transitional sentences seem abrupt and unrelated as if the writer could not percieve an overall theme and plan. 2603:6081:403:DA88:F9A3:5E0E:A269:5809 (talk) 22:05, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  is this written by A. I. Quor/abot?