lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Axminster

message: "Mee (1965) states that the Battle of Brunanburh was probably fought here, in 937."
I have removed this from the article as most sources place this battle in northern England or southern Scotland. Bfp  (talk) 20:35, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I was close! :) Totnesmartin 20:41, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Battle of Brunanburh

message: As a resident of Axminster for 16 years, I have never heard of the Red Dog saloon, of Dover and McCracken or of owners of a hostelry in the town who have remained in possession since 1981. I have consulted the present County Councillor who has been district councillor for many years and a local resident (with an entirely normal thirst) for over sixty years. That personality has no idea what this Red Dog saloon might be. 
The two names are well-known spoof vulgarities, if one does not take them at face value.
Could an editor examine this paragraph with a view to deleting it ?Rupert Butler (talk) 22:49, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Axminster - introduction - third paragraph 

message: Should Harry Duffield not be included in the Notable people section? Rustygecko (talk) 19:55, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Harry Duffield
Talk:Whitney Reed

message: At least in the third paragraph.
Has anyone actually bothered to read it?  I am staggered that it has apparently been here for quite a time in that form.  Hayford Peirce (talk) 21:57, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed POV paragraph.  If you feel this article needs an upgrade and more details, then upgrade it and add more details. tennishistory1877 (talk) 16:46, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is the most non-encycl., non-WP-type article I have ever read
Talk:Infinite (Stratovarius album)

message: Someone should update the re-release date. Currently it reads: "It is set to be re-released on June 26 internationally". What year is that and was it released at that date eventually? --Mika1h (talk) 11:24, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-release date 
Talk:Ashton-in-Makerfield

message: The article on 'Park Lane Unitarian Chapel', Bryn, has been transferred from Ashton in Makerfield article to it's rightful 'Bryn' article. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.192.242.187 (talk • contribs).
:REPY: Until recent times Bryn was part of the district of Ashton-in-Makerfield. Nearly all the other 19th century chapels deleted form the article are in present-day Ashton. To omit, or brush over, the rich history of native Christian non-conformity from an article on Ashton would be ridiculous. Similarly, the history of coal mining in the area needs a substantial entry. Yozzer66 14:17, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Park Lane Unitarian Chapel

message: Do we have a source that the town is split between the metropolitan counties? It is unusual (though not impossible) for urban areas to be divided by borough, let alone county. I'm not doubting it as such, but such a distinction should have a source attributed to it to validate its inclusion. -- Jza84 · (talk) 21:25, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps this ought to be made much clearer in the lead section? As far as I can see from a map I have to hand, A-in-M (the urban core) is completely within Greater Manchester. -- Jza84 · (talk) 23:19, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  In Merseyside/Greater Manchester? 

message: Did I miss something? I wasn't sure why town links were deleted. Brixtonboy (talk) 16:02, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  LInks
Talk:Wieland Speck

message: Here is a quote from The Queer German Cinema by Alice A. Kuzniar (Stanford University Press, 2000), , p.188:
"Among the gay male directors who merit more attention than space unfortunately allows, Wieland Speck is probably the best known--but more for his feature-length film, Westler, East of the Wall (1985), and for his programming as director of the Panorama section at the Berlin film festival, than for his shorts."
Google Books link: http://books.google.com/books?id=Di3JOjU-qtQC&lpg=PA172&dq=%22Wieland%20Speck%22%20gay&lr=&as_brr=3&pg=PA188
--Arxiloxos (talk) 16:36, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thumbs up! Add it to the article. Debresser (talk) 18:05, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes, add it. There was plenty of evidence to link him with gay films but I couldn't fidn anything in English stating he was gay. Occuli (talk) 19:26, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  LGBT
Talk:Wietse Venema

message: The article says Dr. Wietse Zweitze Venema (born 1951) is a Dutch programmer and physicist best known for writing the Postfix mail system. He has also written numerous other security related tools, such as.....
"other security related tools" implies that the "Postfix mail system" is a security related tool as well.
However, while the Postfix mail system is considered to be quite a good and secure MTA, it is certainly not a "security realted tool".
Since I'm an exim-guy myselfe and not a postfix-lover, I hesitate to perform a change myself and would like someone else to do this.
Thanks.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.13.72.153 (talk) 14:56, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: He wrote Postfix because he wanted a secure MTA, after concluding that sendmail was a monolith and unfixable for that reason; a completely new design was required.  So security is the reason Postfix exists: it is secure software, but it is not security software. Rp (talk) 10:05, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad wording? 

message: The opening paragraph jumped out at me as well.  I made an effort to improve it.  Postfix may be my favorite MTA but I doubt that it  influences my grammar.
Mike Duskis (talk) 00:58, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  I think I improved it 

message: This article is not cited at all.
--Glubbdrubb (talk) 13:07, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations?
Talk:Jenna Leigh Green

message: Jenna's year of birth differs from site to site.  Was she born in 1974 or 1977?  Hotwine8 20:08, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think 1977, since she apparently graduated from high school in 1995.  -- Ssilvers (talk) 17:43, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  1974 or 1977 

message: According to the article:
"She played Arnee in Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace". 
I admit I have never seen the Phantom Menace, even though I really like the old Star Wars Movies (that would be Episode 4 to 6). But I am a fan of Jenna Leigh Green since a long time, so I guess, if she would have been in such a big movie like Star Wars, I would know this. I mean this movie is from 1999, and today is the first time, that someone mentions Star Wars. 
I just re-checked with IMDB. There was no "Arnee" at all in this movie. However, there was a girl called Amee, played by Katie Lucas (daughter of Georg Lucas), and an alternate name of her is Jenna Green. Whoever edited the article here needs to pay more attention to such details. I will remove the Star Wars part since it is obvious wrong.  --NASCARaddicted (talk) 12:32, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Star Wars ???
Talk:Wil Mara

message: A quick spin through Amazon seems to suggest that most of the "70 books" this guy is supposed to have written are 32-page-long biographies for 1st and 2nd graders (like this, this, and this).  See the WorldCat search results. So where's the notability? The inflated claim severely undermines the credibility of the article's author and makes me suspect vanity. --Calton | Talk 15:11, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Wil Mara emailed the Wikimedia Foundation through m:OTRS, and denies having anything to do with the writing of this article. David.Monniaux 09:45, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability?
Talk:Inquisition Symphony (album)

message: The links dont show articles about the tracks, but additional information of what the tracks could be about. But there are allso links to disambiguations.
There is an own article about Nothing_Else_Matters_%28Apocalyptica_Single%29, that could be linked from here.... --85.181.52.78 11:37, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links of tracks 

message: Only reviews by "Staff" and "Former Staff" are not user generated. Reverting my edit shows a clear disinterest in this site's own policy on user generated content. 174.251.65.84 (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sputnikmusic
Talk:Wil McCarthy

message: I have commenced a tidy-up of the Bibliography section using cite templates. Capitalization and punctuation follow standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, as much as Wikipedia templates allow it. ISBNs and other persistent identifiers, where available, are commented out, but still available for reference. This is a work in progress; feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 10:00, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography
Talk:Battle of Baton Rouge (1862)

message: Some mention should be made of the health of both armies, particularly the Confederates. Apparently almost half of their original force was lost to the effects of "fever" (I do not know its nature). The Union army was also debilitated, but not to the same extent. PKKloeppel (talk) 03:20, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Health of the respective armies

message: During the summer [’62], Major General Earl Van Dorn, commander of Confederate forces east of the Mississippi…
:Van Dorn’s own page says he was appointed commander of the Trans-Mississippi District [i.e. West of the river] in January ’62. He was then ordered over to the East bank to cope with Grant, but I never heard that he was appointed commander of Confederate forces east of the Mississippi  -  if there ever was such an appointment. In theory, that would mean he would out-rank Lee and Bragg. Maybe it could have meant commander of the Eastern half of the Western theatre (equivalent of Buell in Tennessee). The dedicated page for Theophilus Holmes says ‘Holmes was then reassigned to commander of the Trans-Mississippi Department [not District]’, apparently some time in ’62, but doesn’t give a date. Do you have any relevant citations? Valetude (talk) 15:24, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Van Dorn
Talk:Insen

message: I think this article needs to be divided into two, because of the "insen" tuning scale that resembles the Hirajoshi scale already described here on wikipedia. More on the In Sen scale here.
Whether you write "in sen" or "insen" is difficult for me to figure out, as japanese does not seem to have quite have the same concept of space between words as in english. Someone with a deeper insight on this should decide.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Joachim Michaelis (talk • contribs) 15:01, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  It's also a japanese tuning scale
Talk:Abuja Accord (Liberia)

message: c-r.org is a respected source, and I don't think that having a link is bad.  In fact, I think it is the right thing, and I think the source is the right source for this sort of thing. Smmurphy(Talk) 20:21, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The link was removed as part of linkspam coming from one IP. If you as an independent editor would like to add it, feel free to do so (though not as "References" unless it has been used as such). Femto 20:39, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

text: will do, just don't generally like too re-revert without bringing it up in discussion. Thanks. Smmurphy(Talk) 00:52, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: For normal content disputes you're absolutely right, it's best to talk it out first. However, when a spammer drops his link on dozens of articles (without a prior discussion), it's counter-productive to try to discuss each individual addition. --AbsolutDan (talk) 01:01, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

text: The link is referenced (in a way) in that the article discusses the contents of the accord itself. Usually I've looked at the text of this and other West African agreements, I've used c-r.org (although it has changed its look recently). So far, the information in the article is fairly benign and nothing is sited, nor would it be if it were in a journal article. Anyway, I've lft the link in References, but it could be just as easily called External Links with no argument from me. Smmurphy(Talk) 01:10, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: text of accord link
Talk:Braum's

message: The article says that Braum's is based in Tulsa, OK.  Their main operations are in Tuttle, but their corporate office is in Oklahoma City.  Concur? 74.195.236.7 (talk) 20:47, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: It was changed by an anonymous user with no explanation given. I'm changing it to Oklahoma city as per the FAQ on the company's web site. SEWalk (talk) 15:27, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Headquarters

message: I don't know the author's intent, but I don't see how Braum's is a three syllable word.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:18B0:7390:981E:A741:B052:1360 (talk) 18:41, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation  

message: Braum's headquarters isn't in Corsicana Texas and it wasn't founded in Corsicana Texas 134.69.239.188 (talk) 20:37, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect Headquarters and Founding Location
Talk:Wilbur Wong Yan Choy

message: I removed the link to Chinese in the phrase "Chinese Methodist Church." Linking to Chinese just links to a disambiguation page, which creates a need for Disambiguation link repair - You can help!. I didn't know whether to change this link to Chinese, Chinese or some other topic, so I removed it. You can put the link back in, making it more specific as I just outlined. Thanks! Ling.Nut 01:49, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chinese Methodist Church 
Talk:Wiley Wiggins

message: I dont know much about Wiley Wiggins of his mother, but it says he was born in 1976 and that he was a member of Janis Joplin's band "the Walter Creek Boys." Janis Joplin, however, died in 1970 so there is an obvious inconsistancy which someone can hopefully explain.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.122.53.119 (talk) 04:56, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A properly-sourced year of birth is needed for this person. Xboxsponge15 (talk) 22:43, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accurate year of birth needed
Talk:Wilf McGuinness

message: The team photo states McGuinness  is fourth from the right in the back row, he isn’t- it’s Freddie Goodwin 2A02:C7C:D888:D00:A5E1:56B0:9FA9:7EDF (talk) 14:26, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Team Photo
Talk:Internet Dating Superstuds

message: It says "This song addresses environmentalists and vegetarians, suggesting that it is wrong to value one type of animal's life over another." 
Vegetarians don't value one type of animals life over another.. this is (often) why they're vegetarians. Vegetarians don't eat tuna. If anything it would be addressed at Pescetarians or non-vegetarians who care about the dolphins. If have the completely wrong message maybe someone can change it back?
Cheers  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.148.113.14 (talk) 02:31, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Unseen Tears of the Albacore
Template talk:User WikiProject Ottawa

message: As you can see in the page history, there are four different colour versions for this userbox.
# Basic Beige
# Red picture background, white text background with red text
# White picture background, darkish red text background with white text
# Black picture background, white text background with red text and red border (current)
Which of these would you prefer, or do you think we should have more than one to choose from?
=== Votes ===
* #3. I like this one best; it seems to balance out the red and white nicely and the picture doesn't get lost in colour. I also vote for two userboxes, one red&white and one in the blue, green & white of the Ottawa Flag. — Editor at Large ( talk) 20:27, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colours 

message: * #3. I like this one best; it seems to balance out the red and white nicely and the picture doesn't get lost in colour. I also vote for two userboxes, one red&white and one in the blue, green & white of the Ottawa Flag. — Editor at Large ( talk) 20:27, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Votes
Talk:Custom House Tower

message: "The new tower was 151m (496ft) tall, easily Boston's tallest building until the 1947 John Hancock Tower, which is just one foot shorter. Both were trumped by the 1964 construction of the Prudential Tower. The clock on the upper tower of the building measures 22 feet in diameter. The building has 32 floors and was recently converted into an 80-room Marriott Hotel. Fourteen years before this conversion, the tower lay inaccessible and unoccupied."
What's the deal with this paragraph?  The John Hancock Tower surpassed the Customs Tower despite being shorter?  And what's with the "fourteen years" part?  Who cares?  Presumably it was also inaccessible thirteen years before the conversion, as well as three and a half years before the conversion, and at any other time between when it was rendered "inaccessible" (when? how? why?) and when it was converted.  Anyone care to take a shot at fixing that odd section?  Foxmulder 20:27, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, I figured out what was going on with the John Hancock Tower sentence and tried to fix it. I guess somebody was trying to say that it was no longer easily the tallest tower in Boston, just the tallest tower in Boston. Confusing way of putting it, though.  Foxmulder 20:37, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Willy Caballero

message: Folks, i don't think the deal is official as of yet. As i respect well-intended users' work very much, i will not remove last additions (including mine, it was i as anon :)), but just saying...Please check for instance Marca (newspaper) and you will see.
Attentively - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 16:05, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not official 

message: Shouldn't there be an extra paragraph (or another section) about his performance in that match? He won the match and the cup for Man City with his GK skills.
(Also the final score was 2-1, the PK result was 3-1)2602:306:CD9B:E9A0:8DBE:37A9:3207:6E5E (talk) 21:26, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  2016 League Cup Final (including the PK Shootout) 
Talk:Invitation to the Dance (album)

message: I found :Image:40 below invitation.jpg and noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. Someone will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If it was obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the  tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as  or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If there are other files on this page, consider checking that they have specified their source and are tagged properly, too. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:15, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unspecified source for [[:Image:40 below invitation.jpg]]

message: :Image:40 below invitation.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 05:15, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:40 below invitation.jpg
Talk:Wilfrid Hodges

message: I removed "When this 780-page book appeared in 1993, it quickly replaced "Model Theory" by Chang and Keisler as the standard textbook on model theory." and replaced it with "When this 780-page book appeared in 1993, it quickly became one of the standard textbooks model theory."
It might be difficult to cite either version. I think the second, weaker version is not controversial, but the origional seems to suggest that in 1994 Chang and Keisler was no longer considered a standard textbook. Bearing in mind that the choice of material and style is rather different, I think that many see these books as complementary texts - to say nothing of newer books like Marker or Poizat, or whatever your favorite is. Thehalfone (talk) 13:40, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Standard text book
Talk:Irish Tour '74

message: Someone made an edit where they removed calling the IRA terrorists saying that was value based prose. The IRA were terrorists, that's simply a fact. Whether they were justified is a different question that has no place in this article but its no more controversial to call them terrorists than Al Queda. And the other change in that edit was also wrong. It somehow blamed the failure of acts to go to Belfast on "British agents". The things written about the acts was directly supported by the article which is still available on the rory gallagher web site. --MadScientistX11 (talk) 04:17, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  justification for reversing a recent edit
Talk:Wilfrido Vargas

message: :File:Wilfrido Vargas - Abusadora.ogg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a non-free use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
-- Marchjuly (talk) 04:59, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for File:Wilfrido Vargas - Abusadora.ogg