lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Bata Airport

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Bata Airport. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051125005922/http://www.ceiba-guinea-ecuatorial.org:80/guineeangl/12_inaug.htm to http://www.ceiba-guinea-ecuatorial.org/guineeangl/12_inaug.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
 Cptmrmcmillan (talk) 07:56, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified
Talk:Optical flat

message: I think that we should add a section or a link on how to use an optical flat, any takers? David Casale 12:54, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

message: Seems like the author has the terms confused - winging flat surfaces together can cause sticktion - but wringing is not stiction.
:Wringing is the forcing out of the air, which produces a vacuum force that holds the surfaces together, like a suction cup, making it difficult to pull them apart. This article never even touches on static friction (stiction) which makes it difficult to slide them relative to one another. The stiction, however, in enhanced by the wringing, forcing the surfaces harder together. Zaereth (talk) 06:02, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  The physics of wringing (to the extent that it is understood) is also discussed at gauge block > wringing. I added a cross-reference. — ¾-10 22:16, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. That is helpful. Of course, the difference here being that flats are usually cleaned very thoroughly and allowed to wring naturally. (Usually, but not always.) Just set it on top of the test surface and watch it go. Maybe apply a little pressure to one side to set the direction of the wedge, but little effort should be required. Wringing should not be a problem if everything is flat and clean enough, but getting them apart again without scratching or breaking them is another story. (Not to mention you can get just as good if not better measurements, and a clearer picture of the surface, from initial wringing. The fully-wrung contour lines can be difficult to decipher sometimes.) Zaereth (talk) 22:42, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

text: It does when testing with an optical flat. There is a slight wedge of air trapped between the surfaces. Without it, no fringes would form. This air likely exists in a vacuum chamber as well. It's impossible to get all of the air out, and even at pressures of a few micro-torr gases like oxygen and water vapor tend to cling strongly to the surface via adsorption. You can't read it on a gauge, but it becomes very apparent when building things like lightbulbs, flashtubes, or neon signs. If they put the surfaces together and then sucked the air out, it would not speed up wringing in the slightest. Zaereth (talk) 07:28, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stiction vs wringing

message: The light traveling on the left side of the image, reflecting from the internal surface of the optical flat is showing 180° shift where it should not be. 2601:40C:4301:3726:81D2:3621:4DFE:7478 (talk) 01:40, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current image showing light traveling through optical flat is incorrect
Talk:X-ray optics

message: Article should mention lobster eye optics ? (Described in Keith Nugent) - Rod57 (talk) 22:24, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  No mention of lobster eye multichannel optics 

message: Hi, if its of any interest I found a journal article tentatively suggesting that room temperature or ETSC superconductors *might* act like superlenses even at X ray wavelengths, provided that the lattice structure matches up with the desired energy level.
Closer to a metamaterial selective filter than a lens but still very useful. 
In this case even HTSCs may work, its been discussed in various journals that shielding with LTSCs (eg MgB2) might be possible.
The actual discovery of YBCO and LaBCO HTSCs was complicated by the crystal acting like a 3-D diffraction grating for certain energies of incident radiation, in this case as the critical temperature is 77K this is a non issue as the imaging takes place above this. 88.81.128.160 (talk) 06:22, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Metamaterial lenses?
Talk:Fractus cloud

message: Does anyone think that there should be separate articles for Stratus fractus, Cumulus fractus, and Fractonimbus? The High Fin Sperm Whale (talk) 00:57, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: If you want to create it, go ahead, be bold.  There's not a pressing need for separate articles though, since this one isn't setting any article size records.  Thegreatdr (talk) 04:07, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seperate articles for Stratus fractus, Cumulus fractus, and Fractonimbus 

message: I have heard from general word of mouth and in particular from a meteorologist I know that fractus clouds can form above forests during rainstorms. This is apparently because the elevated humidity allows increased transpiration from trees during rain to contribute to the formation of ground-level clouds, however when I try to look it up or research this, I cannot find anything saying this is at all the case. I would like to incorporate it into this article if it is true, and was wondering if anyone else had heard of this or could even point me at sources for it, cheers. XiphosuraTalk∞Edits 05:07, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Aha, managed to find it. I was looking for silvagenitus clouds. Specifically, stratus fractus silvagenitus. XiphosuraTalk∞Edits 07:59, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fractus germination from trees
Talk:Wordpad

message: The thing links to a porn site ATM. I'm just going to delete it since there doesn't seem to be much merit in it being there as it is. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.211.25.9 (talk • contribs) 
:Already done thanks. Please sign your message with ~~~~ and that will leave a singnature so we know who to thank in future. Cheers Khukri  (talk . contribs) 21:38, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spam
Talk:Caisteal Abhail

message: Caisteal Abhail is commonly known in Scotland as "The Sleeping Warrior" - see . Some other web-sites state that it is Goat Fell or Beinn Tarsuinn and Beinn Nuis that are know thus, but they're wrong. Camillus (talk) 21:30, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sleeping Warrior
Talk:Non-achromatic objective

message: I have rm'ed the following to talk since in its current form it is non-encyclopedic advice (WP:NOTMANUAL):
A common beginner mistake in designing monochromatic objectives to be used with near-zero field of view, such as collimators, is to design only with zero field of view.  The lens design program optimizer will only correct what it knows about any given lens.  Such a lens will likely have sharp on-axis performance, but may have enormous coma, rendering it virtually un-manufacturable and unusable in practice.  A zero-field lens should always be designed with a nonzero field of view so that its manufacturing tolerances and quality control are practical, and its alignment tolerance in the final system is reasonable.
75.197.145.65 (talk) 18:49, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletions

message: If one doesn't have access to achromatic lenses then which simple lens is better for telescope objective: plano-convex or biconvex?
47.29.65.204 (talk) 16:32, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Plano vs biconvex?
Talk:Flight ceiling

message: Please state what the letters, AGL, represent. I, as others, will make an unqualified guess. (````)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by HS.1099 (talk • contribs) 17:56, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

message: I just noticed a reference to this being stuck into the disambiuguation page ceiling. Surely this should just be merged into Ceiling (aeronautics) and turned into a rediredt? Dmcq (talk) 09:30, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ceiling (aeronautics)
Template talk:User browser:SeaMonkey

message: I don't see why the use of the Seamonkey logo on this userbox would violate the criteria at Template:Mozilla.  Is there some Wikipedia policy that precludes this usage?  Brock256 21:33, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, Template:Mozilla describe a non-commerical, non-derivative and use by permission license wich is not permited on Wikipedia (they are not free content). So they can only be used under a fair use claim on Wikipedia, and our fair use policy expressly forbid the use of fair use material in templates and on userpages. --Sherool (talk) 05:38, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, then I guess it's fortunate that Burnte has corrected the licensing information on :Image:SeaMonkey.png to reflect the fact that it's tri-licensed.  Thanks for the clarification of the fair use policy; I'll have to give that a closer look if I'm ever involved with content like that in the future. Brock256 07:06, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Daimler Manufacturing Company

message: I will begin putting the Internet sources into all Mercedes Benz informs at whom I have been working throughout this year.--AndresArce 21:34, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Caoimhín

message: Please do not undo my changes. The name Caoimhin is the original Irish version of the name Kevin - I should know, it is my name and I am Irish, if you do not believe me, then do a google search on the name. It may well also be something out of "Dungeons and Dragons" I do not know - but I do not like people undoing constructive changes.
:Don't take it personally, but your change wasn't constructive. As I noted, your addition is better served on Wiktionary. Also, if you want to be taken more seriously by your fellow Wikipedians, I'd highly recommend registering and signing your posts on the talk pages. To give you a chance to expand the article, I'm moving the current article to Caoimhin (Dungeons & Dragons). Good luck.--Robbstrd 21:36, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:John Gregory Dunne

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 01:07, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: This article has been reverted by a bot to  as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) This has been done to remove User:Accotink2's contributions as they have a history of extensive copyright violation and so it is assumed that all of their major contributions are copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. VWBot (talk) 14:23, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 
Talk:Anne Gwynne

message: I have removed the reference to Gwynne's identification as a Democrat. She may well have been one, but the cited source (Motion Picture and Television magazine, November 1952) has been proven false; there is no mention of Gwynne's (or anyone's) political affiliations in that issue. See this talk page for more information.
Gcjnst (talk) 02:45, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Political affiliation
Talk:Malfador Machinations

message: RE: "Do not add Space Empires I to this list. It was developed and published by Aaron Hall as an individual, not by the company this article is about. Thus, it does not belong here."
For reference, the only time the game was ever published was on a compilation CD of SEI, SEII and SEIII, by Malfador Machinations. Fyron 21:40, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Shin-Kōbe Station

message: There is a sentence that "It is located on the north side of the city of Kobe at the foot of Mount Rokko."
But I feel that it is not an exact expression, because there lies Kita-ku, Kobe at the north side of Mount Rokko. Please see :Image:Kobe kus-.PNG. Higest peak of Mount Rokko is in Nada-ku which is indicated as 8, Shin-Kobe station is located in Chuo-ku which is indicated as 7 and Kita-ku is indicated as 2. Penpen (talk) 03:19, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I see what you mean. I have reworded the introduction to say "It is located to the north of Kobe city centre, at the foot of Mount Rokkō". Does this seem OK now? --DAJF (talk) 05:43, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. I agree with your proposal. Penpen (talk) 18:39, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Both of this station and Mount Rokko are not located at the north side of city of Kobe 

message: Maya Cablecar are somewhat distant from Shin-Kobe. Sannomiya is same as close.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Laitr Keiows (talk • contribs) 13:56, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:   Surroundings
Talk:Cyborg (film)

message: Instead of sadistic outlaws, I changed phrases to murderous marauders. Since, along the movie, we can't tell which law they're out, since the world's in total anarchy, "marauders" (they can be seen marauding villages along the coastline) apply for better. They're not just sadistic, since sadism implies only giving physical pain to others, they're murderous and even murders people without displaying any sadism towards (knife-to-neck murder in the very beginning of the movie). --Mr. Nighttime (talk) 11:48, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  phrase substitution 

message: The link to Alex Daniels points to a guy that was born in 86. I don't think it is this guy.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Caviar d'Aberdeen (talk • contribs) 18:42, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alex Daniels 

message: Hi Metal121. I see we're going round in circles on this one and are both in danger of breaking the 3RR. What say you we take this to an administrator and see what they say? Quentin X (talk) 22:26, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds good to me. Quentin X (talk) 13:46, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poster dispute 

message: Unable to edit due to the page being locked...
"Cannon Films initially intended to make a sequel to the 1987 He-Man film Masters of the Universe and a live-action Spider-Man film."
Substitute link to 'Spider-Man' article with more specific https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spider-Man_in_film#Cannon_Films
Regards 217.33.79.34 (talk) 18:18, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Good idea.  Thanks. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:24, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit suggestion 

message: The following line is inaccurate:
"The film was shot entirely in Wilmington, North Carolina."
According to IMDB, Cyborg was shot in over a dozen locations: 
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0097138/locations
At a minimum, the original line should be corrected like so:
"The film was mostly shot in Wilmington, North Carolina." Mokolabs (talk) 05:06, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Content on IMDb is  user-generated, and thus considered unreliable. Actualcpscm (talk) 10:37, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 11 May 2023
Talk:Lisa Hayes

message: This is the Lisa Hayes discussion article.
----
Let's not merge this, Lisa is still somewhat of a different character from the original Macross series
:Merge suggestion removed. Mintchocolatebear 09:43, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose merge - Agreed. Let's not confuse the Macross and Robotech storylines any more than already has been done. -- Corsair Armada 18:48, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Oppose merge - Agreed again.  I am removing all merge suggestions for any Robotech character involved.  I agree that Robotech character descriptions should include links to any character descriptions from the original source material.  After all, they do share the animation.  However, the fact is that Robotech as a story concept and development is completely different from its source material.  It's time to end the confusion between them. Kinglehr 02:59, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge Discussion (2007)
Talk:List of All-Star Squadron members

message: If Magno and Neo were killed in the bombing of Pearl Harbour, and the All-Star Squadron was founded in response to the bombing, how could they have been members? --74.98.92.19
It would appear that Neon was not killed; still he didn't participate in any further team activities. Hence, he was not an All-Star member. Anyway, you are right. I suppose that the rather complicated DCU history with all the different universes and retcons is not making things easier. I would prefer a somewhat more detailed list, like the entries for other teams... not an easy job though, otherwise somebody might have done it already. Wsgo, 20/08  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wsgo (talk • contribs) 08:38, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hang on a second: I just saw the Allies section! 
Can somebody please justify why all those non-WWII characters are listed as Squadron members? I don't think the statement that all published heroes of that time being members is sufficient. I mean Arak, the Black Piarte etc. being members of the All-Stars??? I don't think so. The Marvel Family should be listed under "Membership" and Infinity, Inc. not at all (if there was'nt any time travel related retcon I missed over the years; to my knowledge All-Star Squadron #25 or 28 only included promotional material and not an in-story appearance of the Inc. not to mention member ship in the Squadron. 
I'm not sure about the Young Allies and the Newsboy Legion. I'd like to see some references there as well. Same for Little Boy Blue or Little Miss Redhead . Wsgo 20/8  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wsgo (talk • contribs) 08:55, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Googled it. Added references. Alucardbarnivous (talk) 12:56, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  membership / allies 

message: Shouldn't the following members and associates have their own entries?: Blue Boys, Little Boy Blue, Little Miss Redhead, Tor, the Master Magician, Commando Yank, Neptune Perkins, Golden Gladiator, Miss Liberty, and Srongbow. 108.85.0.173 (talk) 03:13, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Entries
Talk:Braddock: Missing in Action III

message: According to this doc, four people were killed in a helicopter crash during the making of the film. Seems worthy of mention to me if it's verifiable. See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iM7WqxTyg5s&feature=related at 2:14 and again at 2:37. Zepheus <ゼィフィアス> (talk) 04:52, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Helicopter accident
Talk:Embassy of Serbia, Budapest

message: This building was donated to the Republic of Serbia by famous Serbian poet and painter, Đura Jakšić. There is an interesting story about how Jakšić became the owner of this building, but, I'm afraid that I've forgot it :P (I only remember that some woman was involved). -- Obradović Goran  (talk 21:45, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Plan (archaeology)

message: I tried to clean up the numerous errors on the page, but got a headache when I reached the "Pre-excavation and base plans" section.  Could someone please fix this?  It is completely incoherent and makes absolutely no sense.  Granted, I have very limited knowledge in the subject; in which case it should be expanded so that it can be read by an average person with no prior understanding of this topic.  --Thisisbossi 06:21, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: mea culpa. needs a lot of explaining in laymans terms. expansion requiredBoris 21:24, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I will completly rewite this article in early march when I have finished my current assignement onsite Boris 12:25, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean up
Talk:Wind (spacecraft)

message: I've read somewhere that this satellite was mistaken for an asteroid in the late 1990's. Graham1973 (talk) 15:20, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: After a lot of searching I have confirmed that for a brief period the satellite was designated asteroid 2001 DO47 between the 21st and 25th of February 2001 after it was picked up by the Spacewatch system. Analysis rapidly confirmed that it was man-made. This might be worth adding to the page. Various news items relating to the affair are linked below, I've made them in citation format just in case anyone decides to use them.
Links:
* 
* 
* - (The article was written (and presumably published) before the identity was confirmed and calls on members to observe the "asteroid" to assist in determining its characteristics.)
*
*
*
Graham1973 (talk) 03:42, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mistaken for an asteroid
Talk:Feature (archaeology)

message: The idea here is to create a nexus for feature types without straying into specific epoch specialties. so add to kist and create links and pages to go with elements listed or otherwise. My thinking is to tie the generic features into the methodology section via the feature (archaeology) page rather than a archaeological features cat which is not defined for the reader coming into wiki  as the meaning of the word feature is not specific to its intended meaning in many articles in archaeology that use it. i wish to delete Category: Archaeological features which is poorly populated by clashing articles eg its not helpful to think of a cropmark as a feature rather than just evidence for them. Boris 22:48, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have used the term feature professionally for 20 years and only now realise how fudgable a term it is when trying to define its different meanings in relation to archaeology.. I might go for the term  several different but allied concepts" which i saw being used elsewhere round here.
Some suggestions I made were that some of the sentences such as the introductory sentence were a little lengthy, and the article would probably benefit from breaking these up and making them more succinct.  I also talked about maybe adding something about “Generic Feature Types” in the Lead as well just to give a better overview of the content of the article.  
In terms of content, what was written under “Generic Feature Types” was written in a list/bullet form.  This was easy to follow and to the point.  There was a short introduction talking about what these generic feature types were.  A suggestion I made was to maybe add short definitions of what each of the bullet points were just to provide more insight, making the article clearer for the reader.  
Another suggestion I made was to maybe add some pictures of what these “generic feature types” were, just to give some visual context behind the content of the article.  
There was only one source used for the article, so I suggested maybe expanding this with a few more sources which could even come from defining the bullet points like I mentioned above.  
Beyond this, I thought the article was informative and to the point, and the reader will clearly get the information they are looking for when clicking on this article.  The tone of the article is neutral and I didn’t feel like anything was over or under represented.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Meghana Vemulapalli (talk • contribs) 01:47, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: generic feature list
Talk:Sum-frequency generation

message: Are there special conditions which are necessary for photon combination to happen, or can any two photons do so?  Do they have to collide with a particular material?  What kind of proximity in time and space is needed? -- Beland (talk) 03:00, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Mechanism