lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:General Motors Gamma platform

message: As a German my english might simply not be good enough but my impression is that the following sentence has some mistakes in it. What does  "Acturally" mean to start with? Is "wheelbase" or "Corsa" now writen with capital first letter or not? And what is the sentence all about in coherence with the rest of the article anyways?
 Acturally, S4300 underpins Opel corsa C which has a 2,491 mm (98.1 in) Wheelbase, 
 that was growning from S4200 (Corsa B) which has a 2,465 mm (97.0 in) wheelbase.
UltraBlonz (talk) 21:55, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this a good english sentence? 

message: Why the entire section on Gamma/SCCS was split into a separate article and no text has been left here? SCCS has always been referred as Gamma in GM world and it was mainly engineered by Opel, and Gamma II is a development of that platform as well. --Dmitry (talk•contibs) 20:06, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  Il Pianale SCCS è stato sviluppato da Fiat e GM (Opel) a Torino ed è una piattaforma che non ha nulla a che fare con le vecchie Gamma di General Motors poichè è tutta nuova ed è stata la Grande Punto ad adottarla per prima. Fiat in seguito ha ribattezzato il pianale semplicemente Small come è possibile vederlo nei documenti ufficiali di Fiat Group. Inoltre il nome corretto è SCCS - Small Common Components System, il nome Gamma non è presente --Corvettec6r (talk) 13:18, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: From Corriere della Sera 
http://archiviostorico.corriere.it/2002/febbraio/08/Fiat_General_Motors_insieme_nelle_co_0_0202087834.shtml
"Fiat Auto e Gm Europe hanno raggiunto un accordo per la creazione di un centro di progettazione congiunto per lo sviluppo di componenti e sistemi comuni destinati alle rispettive produzioni di vetture di piccola cilindrata. Il centro di progettazione avrà sede a Torino. Responsabile del centro sarà Ulrich Schmalohr, l' ingegnere a capo della linea «small cars» della Opel, mentre Giorgio Cornacchia di Fiat Auto assumerà l' incarico di capo progetto del nuovo team di sviluppo congiunto, che sarà operativo da subito. Secondo la Fiat, «l' impegno per lo sviluppo congiunto è diretto unicamente a componenti e tecnologia senza impatti sulla specificità del marchio delle rispettive vetture di futura generazione»." --Corvettec6r (talk) 13:09, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't hold it to be a good idea to merge GM Fiat Small platform into this purely GM related article. This platform was a product of the GM-Fiat cooperation which has ended. FIAT is not being incorporated into GM, and so that article about a common project should stand alone, or rather being linked to both corporations, and the respective Wikipedia-categories. Or should all former and future GM only platforms be part of the categors FIAT PLATFORMS??--L.Willms (talk) 10:43, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  split to Fiat-GM SCCS
Talk:Village green

message: Everyone has the right to graze animals on this land although few people now do so. That's common land - not quite the same thing. Naturenet 09:50, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Not quite the same as common land

message: A village green (or rather maybe called village square) is NOT especially at the centre of a village, but rather at the edge(brink) of a (early)small rural settlement ... that is why brinks in the Netherlands have the name brink -> https://www.naarzuidlaren.nl/zien/de-7-brinken/
see also -> https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q57743 ... https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brink_(dorpsplein) --Just2correct (talk) 13:28, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A village green is NOT especially at the center of a village
Talk:List of Swedish military commanders

message: The criteria for this list and the corresponding category (:Category:Swedish military commanders) are not well-defined from the start by User:Mic who created it, but it is quite clear that the intention has been to include field marshals and generals who commanded entire armies. A few minor and non-notable Swedish military officers have recently been added to the list: Joachim Von Rohr (whose name should correctly be written with a lowercase v: von Rohr), Hans Christoffer Von Rohr (likewise) and Anders Örbom. Including these on the list makes it all-inclusive and meaningless. Commanding a minor fortress like Dalarö skans, as Joachim von Rohr supposedly did, does not make him the equal in rank to Johan Banér or the various kings in the list. I don't really think Joachim Von Rohr and Anders Örbom are notable enough for Wikipedia articles in the first place (unless some additional indication of notability is given) and will remove these and the red link Hans Christoffer Von Rohr from the list. / up land 10:40, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Generalized flag variety

message: Actually Stiefel manifold does it with orthogonal groups, not general linear groups.
Charles Matthews 11:21, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Stiefel manifold

message: this is some amazing stuff but i can't grasp it at all.....bravo you smart bastards!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.171.3.145 (talk) 07:31, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you! 67.198.37.16 (talk) 06:24, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  wow 

message: Hi, i am not really sure where to ask this, but I am looking for a way to represent the 2 dimensional compact manifold that is a double torus, alternatively stated: the connected sum of 2 toruses of dimension 2. I am trying to model something, but would prefer a representation close to grassmanian manifold / flag variety / ... without using an "atlas of charts" cutting the topology up which would force me to model fields in the spaces with seperate functions on each chart...
I remember looking this up a few years ago, and I had found a paper/book in which a variety was constructed which was the double torus, however I cant find it back...
Is there a comprehensive overview somewhere on the web which lists compact manifolds and shows the relations between them ? i.e. I would be able to search by dimension, orientability, choose 2 spaces and take connected sum, or product space? the spaces wouldnt need to display a way of modeling the space, just names and perhaps some properties such that I could identify which space I am envisioning and I can communicate it to others? 11:32, 25 April 2012‎ User:83.134.158.212
:I can't quite tell what you are talking about, are you talking about the genus-2 Riemann surface?  This thing: Genus g surface? If so, then I imagine most-any book on Riemann surfaces should cover it. It's a fascinating topic, well-worth every minute spent on it. 67.198.37.16 (talk) 06:31, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  How to represent a "double" or 8 torus?
Talk:Aratti theory

message: The "Aratti" people seem to be an invention of 	
Jahanshah Derakhshani http://www.int-pub-iran.com/ipis07.htm
without even the notability to be debunked anywhere else on the net. dab (ᛏ) 11:40, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: In my Herodotus-edition (German translation by Horneffer, 1971, ISBN 3-520-22404-6) the comment to this is "Artaioi is derived from arta ('truth'). The word also finds itself as a part of Persian personal names." --Samwz 03:31, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Natural History Museum, Vienna

message: I have done a rough translation, please check.
The image of the German page is missing:
 shall be added as the first line.
The article is now the same as the current German verion. --hans 12:08, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've merged content from a duplicate article, Natural History Museum, Vienna.  The content was authored by 81.144.158.195. --Viriditas  | Talk 11:56, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: I moved the article to add (Vienna) to the title as there are other natural history museums in the germanophone world. I think it might be even better to title the article Natural History Museum of Vienna. Eric talk 20:55, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move 
Talk:Mannheim

message: The paragraph about Mannheim during WWII says the city was abandoned by the Germans and that the Americans entered the city unopposed, but the picture right next to it purports to show American troops involved in street fighting in Mannheim. So which is true?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.147.174.153 (talk) 21:22, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  WWII 

message: Despite the title Quadratestadt redirecting to this article, it contains none of the information in the detailed article de:Quadratestadt.  — Scott • talk 10:45, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of city grid content 

message: False information is (indirectly) provided in the fragment "In 1975, the Bundesgartenschau (Federal horticulture show) was celebrated in Luisen and Herzogenried parks. A number of pieces of infrastructure were developed for the show: the telecommunications tower and a second bridge across the Rhine were built", because the link is to the Konrad Adenauer Bridge (check its article for its history, it precedes 1975 by far), rather than the Kurt Schumacher Bridge (built in 1972, so, arguably, for the BUGA). Gonna modify that fragment and provide a link to de:wiki, if I still remember how. Bansp (talk) 20:52, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "the second bridge" 

message: In the description of the numbering schema of the city grid
is the space between the letter and the number missing.
For Example the majors office is located in E 5 not E5.
Source:Imprint of the City Homepage  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Edinger (talk • contribs) 14:57, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Numbering schema of the city grid incorrect formatted
Talk:Cabinet of Fiji

message: Ahmed Ali is now a bad link, because I added an article with that title (different person though). Not sure how I should fix that.... Prater 12:53, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Cabinet of Albania which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 19:46, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Autocovariance

message: In 
:C_{XX}(t,s) = cov(X_t, X_s) = E[(X_t - \mu_t)(X_s - \mu_s)] = E[X_t X_s] - \mu_t \mu_s.\,
must explain what is s. --Krauss (talk) 07:42, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  explain s

message: In
If X(t) is a weakly stationary process, then the following are true:
:\mu_t = \mu_s = \mu \, for all t, s
and
:C_{XX}(t,s) = C_{XX}(s-t) = C_{XX}(\tau)\,
where \tau = |s - t | is the lag time, or the amount of time by which the signal has been shifted.
Please explain more about it. 
:\mu_t ,\mu_s, C_{XX}(t,s)\, and : C_{XX}(s-t)\,can not be found in link provided
--Kezhoulumelody (talk) 13:44, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  explain weakly stationary process 

message: In
The autocovariance of a linearly filtered process Y_t
:Y_t = \sum_{k=-\infty}^\infty a_k X_{t+k}\,
is
:C_{YY}(\tau) = \sum_{k,l=-\infty}^\infty a_k a_l C_{XX}(\tau+k-l).\,
Explain linearly filtered process and what properties the autocovariance will have if it is not a linearly filtered process.
--Kezhoulumelody (talk) 13:51, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  explain linearly filtered process
Talk:Mount Terror (Washington)

message: Mount Terror is named because of the terror induced in travellers who travel beneath it from Northern Pickets to Southern Pickets. The only route is along wet ledges, the most difficult being a ledge ending in a vertical walled slot. Travellers cannot rope up on this ledge, because of ice chunks that crash down a few times an hour.
Please see "Routes and Rocks in the Mt. Challenger Quadrangle" Published by the Mountaineers for description of route below Mt. Terror -- please note that this description is highly understated.  It is also long out of print, but The Mountaineers (Climbing Club in Seattle) will have a copy.
Reason for name is from verbal history related to myself by Joan Firey, editor of the Mountaineer, Journal of the Mountaineers in Seattle Washington at the time.  See Mountaineers at web page: http://www.mountaineersbooks.org/  The Mountaineers are the organization that maintains climbing history in Seattle and should be able to confirm the reason for the name.''
----
If someone could confirm this with a source that is acceptable to Wikipedia, please reinstate into article. Thanks! hike395 14:11, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Oral history removed from article

message: I removed a bit that said that the 1961 ascent by Mike Swayne and Ed Cooper was the first ascent. According to this article Swayne and Cooper found a summit register in 1961 that recorded three prior ascents.  –droll [chat] 05:10, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  1961 accent by Mike Swayne and Ed Cooper 

message: Terror was not climbed in the 1931. There was some confusion in 1931 about which summit was Mount Terror. Strandberg wrote about climbing the peak in this article but evidently he and Degenhardt changed their minds about it afterward. The peak they climbed in 1931 is now named Mount Degenhardt. This is discussed in Beckey.  –droll [chat] 06:17, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  More first ascent confusion
Talk:Mount Bachelor

message: Just a heads up. The remarkable 1915 Robert B. Gould Civil Engineer map titled "Map of The Deschutes Valley, Central Oregon - compiled by Robert B. Gould, Civil Engineer. Bend, Oregon. 1915" has two alternate names for Mount Bachelor. They include "The Bachelor" and in parenthesis "(Snow Bu.)". These two names would do well to make it into the article, at least in the historical part of it. Leitmotiv (talk) 23:19, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  1915 Gould Map
Talk:Three Fingered Jack

message: A user altered the content of this article by making it a redirect and then shifting the content over to reside at Three Fingered Jack which was formerly the redirect. This was done without attribution or warning which breaks the terms of the GFDL. See Three Fingered Jack History for the minor changes made after the move and who made them. That move has now been reversed. David Newton 19:56, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (places) directs us to use official English names of places. Looking this up at the USGS web site (), the official name has no hyphen. Checking the topo map, it also has no hyphen. So, it looks like User:Droll did the right thing in moving the article. I propose moving it back, unless new information comes up. hike395 21:19, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I put in a request at WP:RM earlier today with the USGS naming reference, and the article has now been moved to Three Fingered Jack by an admin.  Let's make sure it stays here in the future.  --Seattle Skier (talk) 09:28, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect
Talk:Mount Humphreys

message: I removed the datum conversion since the elevation is based on the highest topo map contour. Accuracy is ±20 meters (±65.6 ft). A five foot adjustment to an elevation that is so uncertain is meaningless, IMHO. It is more important to inform the reader of the lack of precision. So 4,000+ meters is good, I think. –droll [chat] 18:48, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like you somehow mixed up Mount Humphreys with Red Slate Mountain. I agree with your reasoning, and applied your fix to that other article. —hike395 (talk) 02:15, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  VERTCON conversion 

message: In the Mt Whitney article, it discusses the change in recent years due to more accurate measurements of it's peak elevation from 14,494 to 14,505.  A similar change to Mt Humphreys edges it over 14,000 feet.  Has the true elevation of Mt Humphreys been revisited with the most current technology?
:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mount_Whitney&action=edit§ion=3  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seki1949 (talk • contribs) 17:49, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible 14,000+ Mountain?
Talk:Mammoth Mountain

message: Since we included the recreational use shouldnt we say it is part of a larger artical so no one who is stupid enough tries merging the mountain with the resort. they are two complete different subjects!!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by TJMcDJ (talk • contribs) 20:28, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  At risk for merge? 

message: For the global warming alarmists (and non-alarmists) a conversion of the amount of CO2 released by this mountain into car-culture terms (as much as a day's automobile usage in Dallas? All Texas? Plano?) would be very nice. 65.46.169.246 (talk) 17:01, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  how much is that in gallons of used gasoline? 

message: Back in 1970 I was a college geology student. My geology instructor informed us that there was renewed volcanic activity in the Mammoth Mountain area, including carbon dioxide gas release, a rise in underground temperature, and local seismic activity. It had also been noticed that the forest was dying in certain areas. On summer break that year, a friend and I went to the area and observed the dying trees and the damage to the access road to the nearby Devil's Postpile National Monument where we camped. The local seismic activity had been enough to cause a slight change in ground surface profile in perhaps a fifty acre area so the road had to be repaired in places to be drivable. We immediately noticed that the conifer trees in certain areas were all yellowed and dropping their needles. Linstrum (talk) 04:36, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Could that have been a different area than Horseshoe Lake? Figure 2 of Sorey shows tree kill areas north of Mammoth Mountain, near the Main Lodge. The fumarole on the north flank of Mammoth apparently became active in 1989, while remote sensing showed that the tree kill areas showed up between 1983 and 1993. — hike395 (talk) 05:53, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Carbon dioxide outgassing was known about 50 years ago in 1970 

message: Why no mention of the 1980-82 eruption scare? 2600:8800:204:C400:3D69:366E:6EA6:C6B3 (talk) 07:31, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Strictly, the eruption scare was for Long Valley Caldera, not Mammoth Mountain itself. — hike395 (talk) 16:04, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eruption scare
Talk:Mount Disappointment (California)

message: The citation does not support Mount Disappointment being seen from Santa Susana Mountain. There are the Santa Susana Mountains. Variant names for this range are "Scorpion Hills", "Sierra De Santa Susana" and "Sierra Santa Susanna". All of these names suggest a range of mountains. I can find no documentation for a Santa Susana Mountain. The highest point in the Santa Susana's is Oak Mountain and the benchmark station on that mountain dates from 1898. However the Mount Disappointment was named in 1875 according to the cited reference. I'll try to find better documentation unless someone else does first. droll [chat] 09:06, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Santa Susana Mountain?
Talk:Junipero Serra Peak

message: There is a photo that seems sufficient. May I remove the request template? Trilotat (talk) 15:37, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the template as we have at least one photo. Ixfd64 (talk) 01:56, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Objections to removing the photo request?
Talk:Medicine Lake Volcano

message: Is  an active, dormant, or extinct? --The High Fin Sperm Whale (talk) 04:57, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It is consider to be potentially active. --Burntnickel (talk) 20:53, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Isn't potentially active just a synonym for dormant? --The High Fin Sperm Whale (talk) 01:10, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe it is really a matter of whose terminology you use.  The issue with dormant is that the term is not well defined. --Burntnickel (talk) 00:33, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Status
Talk:Physiologus

message: The hyperlink for Little Crow leads to an Australian crow, which cannot possibly be what the ancient Greco-Egyptian text is about.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.162.250.229 (talk) 17:57, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Little Crow

message: There is a problem here.  At one point in the article, as it now stands, we are told that the translation into Latin occurred around 700 AD; later in the article we are given a date three centuries earlier.
The first date (furthermore) cites T. H. White incorrectly:  in the edition I have (Capricorn, 1960, p. 232) what White actually says is that "the earliest Latin translation of him [the Physiologus]which we have is of the eighth century."
Is there any evidence of a ca-400 Latin version?  If not, it might be better to eliminate the specific reference to 400, and to clean up the White reference by replacing it with something like:
"By the eighth century, if not sooner, the Physiologus had been rendered into Latin".
Mjhrynick (talk) 20:42, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of Latin "translation" 

message: Under the attributions section, is Basil supposed to redirect to the article about the herb? It's surrounded by names of people so I suspect not.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.111.212.41 (talk) 05:56, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for bringing our attention to this issue. Daask (talk) 14:02, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Basil links to the article about the herb? 

message: This entry has been at least temporarily removed because it seems very incomplete:
* Möbius and Hominel in the publications quoted above. --My2100 (talk) 17:32, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  References -- Comment
Talk:Lightning Lass

message: When exactly did that happen? The character hasn't been involved with him for at least 20 years. (if I'm wrong, though, let me know!) Korvac 15:59, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Not that I really know, but I suspect that's a reference to the infamous Adult Legion story - SoM 23:02, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: That may be the case - in which case I'm removing that particular line from the article as it wouldn't refer to the 'mainstream' version of the character. Korvac 14:59, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Married to Brin Londo? 

message: Ayla Ranzz has been Lightning Lass, Light Lass, Lightning Lass again, Gossamer, Spark and now Light Lass again. I suggest there be one article under Ayla Ranzz. Rockhopper10r 16:23, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with Spark (comics)

message: We should rename this article to Ayla Ranzz.Brian Boru is awesome (talk) 23:07, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  In the context of the comics, Ayla has no clear codename within a specific continuity or series run (Lightning Lass and Light Lass).  Her supporting media, also provide little consistency in regards to naming. -66.109.248.114 (talk) 04:44, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Strong Agree - Her code name changes too frequently even within an individual continuity.  Nutiketaiel (talk) 14:28, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Strong Agree - I agree, her code name and changes, and fact that this is not even her current code name makes using her real name, like Garth Ranzz rather than Lighting Lad, the most sense. Sgetz (talk) 18:36, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested Move: Ayla Ranzz
Talk:Irina Pantaeva

message: Well in any sense or point, judging either from her ethnicity or her place of birth, she is not an Eskimo. The links to Buryatia and to the ethnic group Buryat, which I added, will well be enough to tell her origin.--218.191.131.92 15:26, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've done no research on this person whatsoever, but if you look under the date 31 October, it says Irina was born in 1971, while this page says 1972. I don't know which is incorrect.
Thedoctor98 (talk) 06:20, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth Year