Talk:European Arrest Warrant

message: I hit on a redlink for Euroorden in a article for ETA and I fixed that with Euroorden and now want to add this to this article. Does anyone have any more names that are used for this process ?. Ttiotsw 22:19, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Common or colloquial terms for this ? 

message: "Detention of 0.45 grams of cannabis" etc. This looks like a mistranslation, as "detention" doesn't look right in English. Should it be "detection" or "possession"? 86.149.132.157 (talk) 13:56, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does this mean? 

message: This section is vastly one-sided and incomplete. Did the prosecution have any evidence (one would assume so)? What is the Portuguese/prosecution side of the story have to offer? Presumably he wasn't simply "drinking beer with friends" and scooped up for a 2-year prison sentence. 24.16.147.125 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 19:12, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Garry Mann

message: Apparently I'm echoing earlier comments, but are all of these examples drawn from an anti-EAW activist group?  Has an EAW never served a legitimate purpose?
: Yeah, some balance is needed in that section. Currently it's "criticism only", even though it's not named that way. Tijfo098 (talk) 07:31, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The official POV on EAW impact is in  "Final report on the fourth round of mutual evaluations - The practical application of the European Arrest Warrant and corresponding surrender procedures between Member States", which has two corrigenda  , how's that for eurocracy? Tijfo098 (talk) 17:38, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The corrigenda refer to a different document than the one quoted in the article. This should be updated as they have apparently managed to go from provisional report (2007) to final report (2009). KathaLu (talk) 18:20, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

text: There is too much boilerplate from Fair Trials in this article. It focuses too much on UK cases. Other sources for criticism are needed. KathaLu (talk) 18:15, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: POV

message: An EAW was issued for him.  This is likely to become a notable case. Tijfo098 (talk) 07:04, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: He is arrested now, and it is covered a lot in the news, so it is a notable case now. I wrote some time ago in the article, partly as a sarcasm "Several of the above listed people are not prominent enough to have Wikipedia articles. Some people with Wikipedia articles who have got an European Arrest Warrant issued on them are:". What about the balance between people listed with details (some without Wp articles) and people just listed? --BIL (talk) 18:00, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assange 

message: Should be merged here per WP:BLP1E. Tijfo098 (talk) 07:27, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes if more information from the article is added. If not then No, it has its own article in Swedish wikipedia and so on..--BabbaQ (talk) 12:00, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

text: Yes, the article has been given additional information that makes it no longer a matter of merging.--BabbaQ (talk) 16:55, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Calle Jonsson 

message: I agree with the concerns above; it looks like the examples (ie. most of the article content) have been taken form a single source which lobbies against EAWs. The choice of cases, and the wording, gives the impression that EAWs are only used for gross injustices. Is there any way to balance the article? bobrayner (talk) 13:01, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality 

message: The article mentions "driving a car under the influence of alcohol, where the limit was not significantly exceeded (0.81 mg/l)". In many European jurisdictions this actually would be exceeding the limit significantly, the UK having an exceptionally high limit for European (or even world) standards. In many EU countries the limit is 0.20 mg/L or even 0.0 mg/L. I therefore propose removing this example from the article. - TaalVerbeteraar (talk) 18:02, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  0.81 mg/L blood alcohol content 

message: I came looking for this information, and found that it had just all been deleted.  So I have put it back.
Wikipedia articles should not just be dry legal texts, but should include information as to the operation of laws.
I personally have no knowledge of the subject, and make no comment as to the content of this section.
But there clearly is some Controversy.  And it should be aired.
And it certainly should not have been simply deleted without comment.
Tuntable (talk) 01:05, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy Section Restored 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on European Arrest Warrant. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120315053442/http://www.fairtrials.net/publications/article/fti_launches_justice_in_europe_campaign to http://www.fairtrials.net/publications/article/fti_launches_justice_in_europe_campaign
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:14, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Material starting "Due to a leak from within the new Police National Computer of the UK ... " was recently added to this section.  The cited source appears to contain no mention of "the new Police National Computer" and no mention of a European Arrest Warrant. Is there any argument for retaining any of this material?
--Boson (talk) 20:09, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  High profile cases 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on European Arrest Warrant. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110129001657/http://www.ciaran-tobin.com/ to http://www.ciaran-tobin.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:28, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018)