Talk:Continuum

message: I propose to add anodefinition to the list under "continuum", as follows:
Continuum (practical, behavioral, legal, and ethical) -- anything that goes through a gradual transition from one condition, to a different condition, without any abrupt changes or “discontinuities”; can lead to dilemmas and problems in law, government, ethics, etc. 
I also propose to add a new linked page that would describe the new term as follows:
	“Continuum” refers to things that go through gradual transitions from one condition, to a different condition, without any abrupt changes or “discontinuities”. The plural can be spelled as either continuums, or continua.
	An example is provided by how it gets dark, each night, without any particular moment providing a clear dividing line between light and dark. Another example is provided by a spectrum of colors progressing from blue, to green, to yellow, to orange, to red, without any clear and sharp dividing lines between the colors.
	More complex examples arise when using words that do not have clear definitions. As an example, among scientists and dietitians, “meat” includes the flesh of mammals, and excludes insects. Between those endpoints is a continuum, where people can disagree about: (i) whether flesh from other vertebrates (such as birds, fish, or reptiles) qualifies as “meat”; (ii) whether flesh from shellfish, snails, squid, or other invertebrates qualifies as “meat”.
	Still other examples are provided by “shades of gray” and “slippery slope” problems that can be posed in various ways. As an example, if you see a woman get up from a bus or train seat and leave her purse behind, there is no exact point where your actions turn into theft, if you do each of the following, in sequence: (1) watch her leave, without saying anything; (2) pick up her purse, intending to turn it in to the bus driver or conductor; (3) decide to turn it in to the police instead, because you think the bus driver or conductor looks questionable; (4) put it in your car, intending to take it to the police as soon as possible; (5) leave it in your car an extra day, because you had to do an important chore; (6) notice that it was still in your car several days later, and tell yourself that you really should turn it in; (7) take it in your home so it wouldn’t be stolen from your car, still telling yourself you would take it to the police as soon as you had some time to spare; and, (8) place it in a closet or other hidden space in your home, so no one else would notice it and start asking questions. That sequence of steps forms a continuum, and a point that needs to be recognized is this: in the sequence listed above, even though no single step crossed a clear boundary between innocent involvement versus wrongful theft, if you take something of value that doesn’t belong to you, and put it in a hidden place so no one else will see it, then you committed theft, somewhere along the way. In the same manner, even though there is no single moment that provides a clear dividing line between light and dark, at twilight, anyone would clearly recognize that it was light when the sunset began, and it was dark by the time night arrived.
	Some people argue that because of “slippery slope” problems and the lack of clear boundaries, it is effectively impossible to create good laws for governing proper behavior on continuums, and governments therefore should not even try. An answer to that challenge is provided by examples offered by tennis, basketball, or other courts, and by football, soccer, and baseball fields. Even though people might argue about exactly how large they think a court or field should be, the fact is that such contests cannot be played fairly and reasonably, unless the players (i) accept that boundary lines must be drawn somewhere, and (ii) agree to abide by the boundary lines that have indeed been drawn. After the lines have been drawn, the difference between fair and foul, between a shot that’s perfect and a shot that’s out of bounds, is only a fraction of an inch. Accordingly, continuums can (and in many cases must) be divided into clearly divided segments, by rules and lines that are initially decided arbitrarily.
	In government, clear and distinct boundaries must be drawn, somewhere along a gradual continuum, to distinguish between legal versus illegal behavior. One example is provided by laws that distinguish between tax avoidance (legal) and tax evasion (illegal). Legislatures must at least try to draw any such lines at reasonable locations, and courts have the power to supervise such efforts (and force the legislature to start over, when necessary) under safeguarding phrases such as “due process” and “equal protection”.
	In life, continuums provide never-ending challenges to moral and ethical behavior. The temptation is constant and powerful for people to test the system, and try to explore just how far they can go in the direction of selfishness, less-than-complete honesty, and actively hurting other people, not as a goal but as a regrettable and inevitable byproduct, without actually stepping across a line into truly evil and reprehensible behavior. That type of rationalizing and making excuses is tempting and powerful, and it is terribly vulnerable to the dilemmas posed by continuums. Since they have no clear boundaries, no single small step on a behavioral continuum looks a whole lot worse, and a lot more dangerous, than all the prior steps which led someone into an increasingly dangerous region.
However, the nature of continuums offers a different alternative, as well. Even a brief look up, and around, will almost always reveal which direction leads toward safer, better, and more ethical, and which direction leads toward more selfishness, danger, and hurt.
	Accordingly, continuums are not just abstract concepts in mathematics or science. They are real and challenging things that exist throughout nature and society, and they pose dilemmas and challenges that can have huge impacts on how people live, behave, and treat others. People need to understand what continuums are, how they work, and how they can be used both for good and for evil, in order to understand several basic principles of government, laws, and ethics.
--Patenter 19:56, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Continuum was also a sprite based Macintosh and Commodore 64 game released in the mid 1980s  originally released under a beer ware license on Macintosh (if you like the game, send them beer) and commercially on C64.  If I find time I may write up an entry (heck, if I find time, I'll register - no more today, lunch break browsing is over). --146.122.71.136 (talk) 18:09, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mac and C64 game? 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Incessant and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 15#Incessant until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Spicy (talk) 01:02, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Incessant" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]