lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Vajradhatu

message: I've done my best to contruct a reasonable article, with new souces. I've removed the AB material, which (in addition to being flat out wrong) doesn't come close to passing muster at WP:LIVING. Sylvain1972 17:43, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What does WP:LIVING have to do with this? ???  And the material you removed was all completely documented, fact.  Nevertheless, I think the new article is completely reasonable, and I'm content with it. Bertport 14:23, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, the composition of the board was documented fact, but it is not notable in the absence of the spurious allegations of scandal, which did not comply with WP:LIVING. That's why I removed it and the american buddha link. Sylvain1972 15:08, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

text: WP:LIVING is a policy for biographies of living persons.  This article is not a biography, and the primary actors involved are deceased. Bertport 12:44, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The American Buddha article obviously slanders Sakyong Mipham Rinpoche, the main subject of the article, who is living. That is why it is not appropriate.Sylvain1972 09:13, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

text: We are not editing the American Buddha article, we are editing the Wikipedia Vajradhatu article.  The main subject of the Vajradhatu article is Vajradhatu.  The Sakyong Mipham Rinpoche is not the main subject of the Vajradhatu article.  The only mention of the Sakyong Mipham Rinpoche in the Vajradhatu article was the final sentence, "It is widely presumed that the new Sole Director of the First Class is the Sakyong Mipham Rinpoche."  This sentence, and the entire Vajradhatu article as it stood, were not slanderous. Bertport 13:49, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't say the Vajradhatu article was slanderous. The American Buddha article is. And yes, we are not editing that article, but it is not appropriate as an external link or reference. That is the point.Sylvain1972 18:08, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Revised article

message: Are there any explanations by Chögyam Trungpa about why is it that he has chosen Vajradhatu instead of Dharmadhatu?
:Austerlitz -- 88.75.200.76 (talk) 10:28, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Naming procedure
Talk:Myrmecophile

message: Surely the best known examples of myrmecophily are with plants
The article states that the best known examples are with butterflies. Surely ant-plant interactions are far better known and extremely well studied, but don't even get a mention in the article. This should be remedied to give this article some credibility.
-Blahah  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.221.47.90 (talk) 15:57, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Myrmelachista schumanni

message: Is it possible to fit 328 trees into 1300 square meters?  1300 square meters is a box approximately 36 meters on a side.  One would imagine that in a jungle, a large tree would occupy approximately 50 to 100 square meters.  If a zero had been dropped, I could see there being one tree for every 39 square meters --- that would be a lot more reasonable. Araucaria Araucana (talk) 20:24, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Rhode Island State Police

message: One of the ways that the uniform is unique is in the way that the troopers are not issued a traditional badge, such as a local police department, or county sheriff's department, rather, the identification is a set of numbers worn, stamped in brass, placed onto a piece of black fabric, with red piping on the edges, making the identification of the trooper rather unique.
That needs explanation. It might be unique in the USA as all cops carry a "badge" but this is not a unique design per se for other law enforcement units around the world. Other Commonwealth countries like the UK, Australia and New Zealand, and even Canada have use insignia denoted by metal numerals rather than carry a badge.
It seems all rather parochial and small to suggest that the Rhode Island uniform is not without precedent! It would be better to ascribe any views in terms of other American law enforcement agencies to clarify those remarks.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.158.254.162 (talk) 08:55, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unique? 

message: Does anyone else think this article is mostly about the uniforms? That isn't bad, don't go deleting it or anything, but it appears to me to be mostly about uniforms. L3X1 My Complaint Desk 21:31, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  mostly Uniforms of the RISP
Talk:VOC contamination of groundwater

message: Here are just a couple of ideas for expanding this article:
Add some more information to the introduction about how groundwater contamination from volatile organic compounds occurs - these compounds are deposited into the soil from leaks, spills or improper disposal, are somewhat soluble in water, and do not bind tightly to soil.  These are the reasons why VOC groundwater contamination warrants its own article.
The ATSDR has a list of the most important contaminants at hazardous waste sites.  It might provide some perspective to the list of VOCs presented in this article to discuss them with respect to the ATSDR documentation.
There are other good examples of suspected disease clusters associated with groundwater contamination beyond Love Canal and Camp Lejeune (W.R. Grace facility in Woburn, MA; the Fairchild plant in Santa Clara, CA, etc.).  In particular, if Camp Lejeune is going to be discussed, additional detail can be provided from the ATSDR report.  The NAS report on environmental epidemiology (from 1991) talks more about these sites.
Just this year, the USGS published a comprehensive report of VOC groundwater contamination in the US.  It would be a good addition to this article.
I'm not sure there is a "fetal toluene syndrome".  If someone knows the source for it, we should mention it here.
Jlowe19 17:26, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:West Virginia State Police

message: Where the officers who committed this ever dismissed for their undefendable actions?  Prosecuted again under state law or federal law? Made Rodney King look like he was getting a massage! Its unbelievable they could get away with the action when clearly shown on the video!  Smashing a handcuffed prisioner into the ground hitting head on the road! Throwing a handcuffed head injured (by another sheriff) to the ground backwards after being picked up off the floor! --HalloHelloHalloHello (talk) 10:30, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dashcam Video of West Virginia State Troopers Beating Teen 2018
Talk:Blanche Fisher Wright

message: Dear Reader, I would be interested in knowing more about Blance Fisher Wright. I purchased  a Mother Goose book pubolished by her in 1912. the book was in an old barn by an antique shop in New Hampshire. I bought the book because some of the full page illustrations were in great condition and on good quality paper. I started to frame a few as we have eleven grandchildren that we would like to show to them some early 1900 prints.  Mr. Jere E. Brady of Morgantown, PA 19543-0500 4.239.195.161 17:29, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Blanche Fisher Wright seems to have dropped off the face of the earth, but here's a genealogical link that supplies her dates.
http://elf-fisher-family.org/getperson.php?personID=I00057&tree=Fisher
She illustrated Leroy F. Jackson's The Peter Patter Book, a childhood favorite of mine in the 1940s, easily found online. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bob Richmond (talk • contribs) 8 January 2017 (UTC) 
:I doubt the person on the link is actually the author. Checking the 1930 census shows Fisher still m. to Laite, and having been married for 11 years, and recorded age first married as c.1919.; seems unlikely that there was a Wright marriage. From the complete lack of genealogical records, one should suspect a pseudonym. — billinghurst sDrewth 04:28, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I notice that the Findagrave record and the family tree differ in a lot of their statements, eg parents, birth date, death date. Hmm. The book I found said that "information on her life is difficult to find" and listed her as "active 1900s-1920s". Your census info is impressive: hard officially-recorded facts. PamD 14:12, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  Generally I copy and paste research information on the author talk pages at WS s:Author talk:Blanche Verna Fisher, and will typically qualify if uncertain. I will prod the research again, just in case a fresh day brings fresh perspective. — billinghurst sDrewth 21:38, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: There are plentiful records under married name Laite, so it seems that she was a dutiful wife of a successful actor :fr:Charles Laite. There may be something in the social pages of newspapers of the 1920s and 30s. I cannot find much for a Holmes connection back in Illinois, beyond the Find a grave record where she is reputedly buried with her mother, not that I spread a wide net. — billinghurst sDrewth 22:31, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Dates etc
Talk:Myrmica rubra

message: As I understand it this is the common red ant in the UK and many other places.  We really MUST get some more info written about this ant.  Some diagnostics which will tell people that this is the little fellow they have in front of them.  The common ant called the 'Red Ant' near where I live is not really red at all, it is an orangy colour and its called Myrmica Rubra.  I suspect that this one is what many people call 'Red ants' elsewhere in europe at least, since it is one of the most common european ants. IceDragon64 19:16, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Limited info 

message: Although the link I just added is to a University of Florida Featured Creatures publication, Florida does not yet have this species in the state.  We were fortunate that one of our Ph.D. students (H.A. Arevalo) graduated and obtained a job with the University of Maine working on that institution's European fire ant project. While there he authored the Featured Creatures publication I linked to from External Links. The other author is Dr. E. Gordon, chair of his department at UM and the head of that project.  Dr. Arevalo is now back in Florida working for UF. He is a native of Central America, and he let me know that he had never experienced anything like Maine winters. He is happy to be back where the weather is hot and humid. Thomas R. Fasulo (talk) 14:26, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Featured Creatures Publication

message: I propose to expand this article to get it a possible GA standard. The biology, distribution and behaviour has been properly studied, and there are dozens up dozens of published sources everywhere about this ant. I will first solve the citation issues. Burklemore1 (talk) 01:06, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Work to do
Talk:Aniruddha

message: Aniruddha did not marry Subhadra. Arjuna married Subhadra. Aniruddha married Usha.
Robert Lee Camp 
The above unsigned comment was left on the article page by IP:66.234.210.53 on 21:07, 23 January 2007 -Deepraj | Talk 11:33, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments by IP:66.234.210.53 moved from article page to talk page 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Not Moved(closed by non-admin page mover)  Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 08:34, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Aniruddha →  – The name 'Anirudha' is a sanskrit word, and Aniruddha (current page title) is not the 100% accurate pronunciation. There is already a redirect page with the name Anirudha, due to which I couldn't move the page. I would like the current page to be moved and exchanged with the redirect page, as the pronunciation would be more accurate. PPCMD (talk) 12:00, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

text: This is a contested technical request (permalink). —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 14:35, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 7 August 2020 

message: Merge to her husband article - Aniruddha. No independent facts about her Redtigerxyz  Talk  14:16, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Closing, given the uncontested objection and no support. Klbrain (talk) 17:15, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Uṣā]] into [[Aniruddha]] 

message: He'll I am Badshah
I live in Kodi  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.197.63.168 (talk) 10:50, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Computer
Talk:Mysida

message: The article only states the Mysidacea are small. I think it would be an improvement to mention length or weight. Pukkie (talk) 08:24, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Size? 

message: This is a morphological classification [ADD: i.e. Mysidacea] that has lost support. Molecularly they are no way related. It might be best to copy the content into the Mysida and Lophogastrida respectively (keeping this). --Squidonius (talk) 13:19, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. Lycaon (talk) 14:45, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved old Mysidacea to Mysida, to keep the extensive edit history. Mysidacea to be recreated.Mo5b (talk) 21:37, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possibly incorrect classification 

message: Mysis relicta caused an unexpected massive change in the Flathead Lake Water System (Montana, USA). The released  Opossum shrimps turned out to be a severe competitor to the lokal salmon species in the oligotrophic lake, both feeding on Zooplankton. This led to the extinction of the Salmon Population, the disappearance of salmon feeding eagles, Bears and others and finally to the collapse of tourism.
Details in the publication:
Craig N. Spencer, B. Riley McClelland, and Jack A. Stanford
"Shrimp Stocking, Salmon Collapse and Eagle Displacement
Cascading interactions in the food web of a large aquatic ecosystem" 
BioScience Vol. 41 No.1, 1991 https://doi.org/10.2307/1311531 Ahrfuchs (talk) 10:49, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ecology
Talk:Stenocara gracilipes

message: Hi! My name is Sachi & I am currently a student in an ecology class. As a part of this class we are including comments on talk pages of articles with some comments & feedback we have, and I would love to contribute to this page with that information! Below, I have attached some of my comments for this article!
One of the strengths of this article is that it is very detailed and very well organized. The author writes about what makes this beetle special by starting with a general overview and describing how it works in detail. Additionally, they talk about how the mechanism by which this beetle survives has been studied by technology researchers to see if it can be implemented in human materials, which is a very interesting but relevant addition to the article - it kept me wanting to read more. 
Three central categories that I think could be included are life cycle/lifestyle, ecology/behavior, and further research. While this article goes into a lot of details about the technology by which the beetle collects water, it is some of the only information that is provided on the page. Including some things about how these beetles are born and grow within the desert environment, especially reproductive habits of female beetles could be a great addition. I think adding an "ecology/behavior" section could build off the life cycle section because living in desert environments is known to be relatively challenging so more information on how this beetle interacts with other organisms in its environment could be an interesting read. Finally, I think a "further research" section would really make this article stand out because the author already has included information about how researchers at MIT are trying to harness this beetle’s water-storing technology for human purposes. Creating a whole section dedicated to that information could lend itself to the author being able to expand more on the progress this research has made, setting this article apart. 
On the Talk page, Wikipedia states that this article has Start status with low importance in the Insects WikiProject. I agree with this assessment because this article is well written and includes lots of detail, it just needs more information about the beetle itself; right now it is mostly just focusing on the beetle’s water-storing capabilities. I look forward to seeing how this page develops because it already is a great read and I would love to learn more about this beetle.
Sachi.sb (talk) 17:20, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Great article, some feedback!
Talk:Namurotypus

message: This is probably not a dragonfly, but a proto-odonate (basal Odonatoptera). The confusion might result from the fact that the Odonata are sometimes considered to be identical to the Odonatoptera - that is, to include the Protodonata (giant "dragonflies"), Protozygoptera etc. But we know not enough about the initial radiation of odonatopteres to make such a loosely defined Odonata seem a good idea. Dysmorodrepanis (talk) 02:24, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Taxobox
Talk:Petrolisthes elongatus

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 00:45, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Labour service in Hungary during World War II

message: I came across this article and noticed its abysmal state: poor grammar, unclear meaning, and misstatements of some facts. Consequently, I did somewhat of a re-write of the first paragraphs, and supplied the major bibliographical works at the end. I've probably made some errors of my own, which others are free to edit and correct. In addition I agree with editor Boskovitz, to the extent that Ukraine was not an independent country, and the description of the troops' destination should properly read "Soviet Union." 66.108.94.216 (talk) 10:33, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite

message: the Nyilas mentioned in the article is better known as Arrow Cross Party which came to power in Hungary in the autumn of 1944 and initiated the fiercest period of the Holocaust in the country. I think it is unfortunate that the article does not make clear if these Arrow Cross were in fact prominent in labor battalion management before the takeover (much like Democrats are prominent in management of American universities despite not being the ruling party) or if that only started in 1944. 76.119.30.87 (talk) 19:50, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Were Arrow Cross people really involved in this throughout the war?
Talk:Nomada

message: I think it could be neat to include a bit on the species-level taxonomy of this genus. Also, I don't know if there are interesting sources on how appearance might vary within Nomada species based on their host, but this would be interesting to include. Additionally, If you have details on other aspects of Nomada ecology, such as phenology, habitat specialization, natural enemies, it would be really cool to include more on aspects of their ecology besides parasitism, which is covered extremely well in this page. 
Muniche (talk) 14:02, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Challenges in identifying Nomada species and additional content suggestions 

message: Clarify cues used... what do they smell in order to ascertain the information described in the parasitism section? "Studies show that Nomada females olfactorily assess their hosts nests using three cues: 1) vulnerability and quality of the host cell, 2) threat of a maternal host’s presence, 3) competition with other Nomada bees. In early spring, they can be spotted flying low to the ground, searching for nests to parasitize.[13]"Muniche (talk) 16:58, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  How do bees smell threats?
Talk:Northern smooth shore crab

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 00:45, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Nuptial flight

message: There is a contradiction between this article and the Queen ant article. In the Queen ant article it is stated that "at the time of egg-laying, the queen may choose to fertilize eggs at will by using the sperm cells retained from the nuptial flight, thereby producing male ants instead of female ants." However, this article states that "Unfertilized eggs will develop into males. Fertilized eggs usually develop into wingless, sterile workers..." If I'm not mistaken all worker ants are females and males are produced specifically for the purpose of mating. So I'm not sure whether unfertilized eggs produce males or females, but I think this contradiction needs to be cleared up. Rajrajmarley 01:22, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fertilized eggs 

message: As per wikipedia policy, I am unable to add information to an article that is unpublished or research which I have done myself... however I would encourage readers to find a source that cites this information in order to be able to add it to the article.
The whole "flight synchronization" phenomena which occurs in nuptial flights is 100% due to the fact that ants require additional humidity in the air in order to actually achieve flight.  Without the added density of the moisture in the air, most ants' bodies are simply are not equipped properly to take flight.  They have a difficult time flying as it is on extremely humid days, let alone on days without the proper amount of density to the air.
It is not that the ants are coordinating with other nests to "synchronize the mating with the individuals of other nests" as the article states  (that is the effect rather than the cause)... its simply that they are unable to do so until the moisture levels have risen enough to create optimal flying conditions. They all fly as soon as they are able (as soon as they observe the proper conditions).  Conditions which coincidentally happen to be nearly uniform across neighboring nests.  -Robtalk 05:12, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  original/unpublished research