lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ballbarrow

message: This article contradicts itself. Which is correct?— Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.41.168.100 (talk • contribs) 23:50, February 19, 2006‎
: Not sure what you mean --gilgongo (talk) 13:37, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  Back when this comment was made, the article said, "It became a best seller in the UK... The ballbarrow only had limited success..." I assume that's what they meant. - SummerPhD (talk) 14:58, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have removed the notability flag because ballbarrows are certainly notable in the UK and Europe, having been used extensively over the last 30 years (see also merger proposal, which notes this Talk:James_Dyson#Merger_proposal_2) . --gilgongo (talk) 13:37, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The article is based on one very brief independent reliable source. The article, such as it is, needs additional independent sources. - SummerPhD (talk) 15:01, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  Agreed, but's that's a citation issue, not a notability one. --gilgongo (talk) 22:10, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  The core of notability is "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". One brief independent reliable source would seem to indicate a brief mention in Wheelbarrow#Variations, such as the material already there. The rest is promotional material from the company. - SummerPhD (talk) 22:57, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability flag 

message: Past tense is correct. Google today provided zero results.
The claims made in this article, and wheelbarrow variations, are, as stated, company propaganda. Ask anyone who has used one on muddy
ground. AnnaComnemna (talk) 08:08, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  Incorrect: https://www.google.co.uk/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=dyson%20ball%20barrow --gilgongo (talk) 09:48, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Ballbarrow was .. 

message: The illustration looks like a traditional wheel. If Dyson's ball was spherical, an illustration should show how it attaches to the hopper. 68.193.244.246 (talk) 19:42, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wiki Illustration of BALL wheel
Talk:Henry Lee of Ditchley

message: The reference to the ring in the portrait being to Anne Vavasour seems inaccurate; Vavasour was not his mistress until at least the 1580s, and the portrait was done in 1568. GD, 16:22 EST, 3 May 2008  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.140.192.115 (talk) 20:22, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have deleted the images of Lee's ancestors and descendants.  Each of them has an article (at least a blue link) where those images should appear.  I would suggest that the portrait of Thomas Lee should also be deleted from this article. - PKM (talk) 02:17, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Images

message: "Apparently" and "allegedly" without citations have no place in encyclopedic articles, and distant relations are insignificant.  I propose that this entire section be deleted.  Comments? - PKM (talk) 08:55, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Trivia section

message: The name of Ditchley continued in the second generation of the Lee family in Virginia thru son Hancock Lee who named his plantation "Ditchley".    I also wonder if Ditchley is misspelt and should instead be "Ditchlee" in its original spelling.99.55.161.46 (talk) 05:07, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Hancock Lee of Ditchley, Northumberland Co, VA, s/o Richard Lee, the Colonist

message: It appears this article is about the same Sir Henry Lee for whom there is a Wikipedia article entitled Henry Lee (died 1611). NinaGreen (talk) 21:15, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Same person as Henry Lee (died 1611)
Talk:The Wedge (surfing)/Archive 1

message: Weren't/aren't boards of any kind banned at certain times of the year? Shawn, Montreal — Preceding unsigned comment added by  69.159.95.245  (talk • contribs) 23:59, February 19, 2006 (UTC)
:During the summertime for the main part of the day (0900-1700 May 1-Oct 31, istr) the Wedge is closed to bodyboards, surfboards, and other floatation devices. Ostensibly for safety purposes but due largely to the carping of the bodysurfer lobby. knoodelhed 08:00, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Boards of any kind banned 

message: Current events at the Wedge should be created in a new category if possible. Someone keeps putting in injuries into the information section and it is improper in that area.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.80.137.244 (talk) 01:42, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Current events

message: Cleaning up and keeping facts and speculation separated is a must on this page.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by  71.80.137.244   (talk • contribs) 20:47, November 18, 2008 (UTC)
*I have collapsed the personal story and comments above, this page is not a place for personal promotion. Also removed the links to external videos and photos. Added some more encyclopedic photos & a video of a recent South Swell break and reformatted the article to Wiki standards. This page has had a great deal of I.P. contributors and the talk page was a mess. talk→ WPPilot   15:43, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: *I uncollapsed it to make it easier to read. --evrik (talk) 21:46, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean Up

message: The Wedge is greatly improved this year (2009) on the inside line. Memorial Weekend saw long lines off the rocks (Backdoor) on Saturday; peaky, 3-section 4-footers on Sunday.  What used to be a five-section run for a bodysurfer has changed now into three fun sections: peak, shoulder, tube. Easy to go all the way to shore on the best lines: something we weren't seeing a few years back. Looks like the sand has filled-in and this summer should be great. 
;CORNER BOWL IS BACK!
Make it official. As of June 2009 the Wedge Corner Bowl has returned in a major way for the first time since the jetty was rebuilt in 1997. The sand must have finally piled-up enough these dozen years since the rebuild. Still only 3 Sections, but very fun sections  from Corner Bowl to sand. We are also seeing the Classic Wedge Peak w/ smooth shoulder left into the Big Hollow Tube.
-LJ  05/09  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.35.236.171 (talk) 20:54, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  2009-2011 UPDATES 

message: Maybe we could add this to the pop culture section?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by DetProf (talk • contribs) 22:07, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  John Wayne
Talk:Legal Action Comics

message: I didn't create the listing for Legal Action Comics on Wikipedia; I just happened along earlier today, saw that the listing existed, and tried to flesh out the information, (which had been minimal to the point of uselessness. 
I see now that someone's deleted the info I posted about my book because "I have a financial stake." Does that mean that the info I posted would be just fine, provided it was posted by someone other than me? 
It strikes me as either stupid, lazy, or hostile, (perhaps all three) that someone opted to delete the entirety of the info I posted, rather than editing it to adjust the tone.
I'm going to restore the info I posted in its entirety, and if someone thinks the tone of it is too self-aggrandizing, I invite that person to make whatever minor changes are needed to achieve the desired neutrality. Dannyhellman 05:16, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks suspiciously like a text-dump to me.  Has this text appeared on another website or in print?  If so it is very likely copyrighted.  Even if you wrote this yourself, but it was used previously in another context, I think you might need to explicitly release it under a free licsence or into the public domain. ike9898 16:05, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

text: This website says explictly that "entire contents of this website copyright 2004 Danny Hellman".  Now it is clear that this content is NOT ALLOWED on Wikipedia until the above mentioned conditions are met.  Wikipedia respects intellectual property rights, and as an artist you should appreciate this.  ike9898 17:49, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

text: Sorry, I didn't make the rules.  Repeatedly submitting copyrighted text can get you blocked. ike9898 19:21, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hello! I was asked to take a look at the situation by Ike9898. While I understand your frustration, let's try and keep calm; getting angry at each other isn't going to do anything but aggravate the situation. Regarding the copying of content: we, unfortunately, cannot accept any material copied from most web pages unless the content is explicitly licensed under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL). If you are the author of the material and would like to do so, please review the terms of the license and send an email to  or  from the email listed in the website and state that the content is released under the GFDL. Please note that doing so allows anyone to copy and reuse the text. While this may seem like a hassle, this is done in order to ensure that no one gratuitously releases the text for you; this is done for security and legal reasons as well. Until then, we cannot accept the text - once you send an email, a member of the permissions/email team will then place the text on the page and verify that the text has been released. For now, though, we can't use the material. Thanks for your understanding! Flcelloguy (A note?) 00:32, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: (copied from [[User talk:Dannyhellman]])
Talk:Elections in Hong Kong

message: This page has been nominated Collaboration Project in zh-wp's HK wikipedians' notice board. The original intention was to simply translate the English article into the Chinese, but in the process numerous factual inaccuracies were revealed -- one blatantly obvious one is that "In 1997, Tung Chee-Hwa was elected with eighty percent of the electoral votes in a four-candidate race." -- there were only two other candidates, namely Mr. Peter Woo (吳光正) and Sir Ti Liang Yang (楊鐵樑). HK Wikipedians please help! -- tonync (talk) (講) 05:21, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Accuracy
Talk:Christian drama

message: Please be nice to this stub. Despite it's length it's still a stub, mentioning only a few landmark events in a huge field. Please be tolerant of its mistakes and omissions. DJ Clayworth 05:34, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I see this is still just a stub, so noting at least one missing area: needs a discussion of Christianity's long-standing antipathy to drama, from at least Saint Augustine. Barish's The Anti-Theatrical Prejudice is the standard scholarly work. DionysosProteus (talk) 12:27, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing information
Talk:Ethical naturalism

message: I removed this sentence from the "Examination of defition" section, because it appeared to contradict the definition given. "Non-reductive ethical naturalism holds that moral properties are not reducible to non-moral (i.e., natural) properties, but are supervenient upon those properties." Should there be two articles (definitions?)? One for reductive ethical naturalism and one for non-reductive? I don't know anything about the subject, so an expert should probably flesh out the article a little more. Chris 05:56, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Examination of definition

message: So "moral naturalism" is just another way of saying "the strong survive, the weak are killed and eaten"?
I mean, nobody's actually eating anybody else, but basically, if I understand the article correctly, it is "moral" for somebody rich and powerful to abuse the poor, simply because they can (and do) get away with it? Am I reading this correctly? xxxyyyzzz 22:58, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I do not believe you are reading this article correctly. Either that or you commented before the modern version. Moral naturalism is merely a proposition that moral facts/values are reducible to properities of the natural world. This does not neccessarilly entail egoism or any other theory. Canadianism 17:03, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  From [[Talk:Moral naturalism]] (article redirected here) 

message: I have brought over a lot of relevant information from a related page - Science of Morality. Some of the information may still need rephrasing in this new context, however. Your constructive criticisms are welcome! -Tesseract2 (talk) 16:27, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Let's discuss at Talk:Science of morality. Thanks!—Machine Elf 1735 (talk) 08:13, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from Science of morality 

message: Pardon my accidental IP edits (I forgot to log in).-Tesseract2 (talk) 18:53, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  edits 

message: What exactly is the policy (if there is one) on topics such as this? There is an image of mountain peaks in the article and it has a caption totally unrelated except to the allegorical reference to mountain “peaks”. Is this kind of metaphorical imagery acceptable? Andrew Colvin • Talk  08:20, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sam Harris mountain image?
Talk:David Rumsey Historical Map Collection

message: This claim appeared on the original article and needs to be supported to justify inclusion:
"The website has come under considerable criticism for being overcomplicated, slow and difficult to use."Elijahmeeks 05:43, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The editor who added the template may not be aware that the online version of this collection has been utilized extensively by Wikipedia editors, and the maps in the linked Commons category are frequently singled out as being among the highest quality map images at Commons.  I removed the template because I believe it is inappropriate and is intended for articles added to Wikipedia by for-profit entities who are promoting sales or individuals who are promoting their careers. However, in this case the Wikipedia article links a website at Stanford University Library (which surely as Wikipedia editors we recognize as a neutral source and a not-for-profit organization) which informs the reader that they have made a notable acquisition of this map collection. The Stanford article also links the private database of high-quality digital copies of the maps. The website is not-for-profit and provides these high-quality digital copies at no charge. --Robert.Allen (talk) 17:48, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Template:Ad is not exclusive to articles created to advertise, but may also be used for articles currently written in a promotional tone. Your claims about the collection having been  and having provided  is not an excuse for the article to be written in non-encyclopedic language. Stanford is no doubt a great point of WP:RS, but my reason for adding the template has mainly to do with the two cases of external links inline, as well as claims of "one of the world's largest", "more recently", "new [...] tool has been added", "most popular being...", "doesn't require any special plug-ins or software", "[examples] and more", and "covering the entire world". Please keep in mind that these phrasings can be true, while still being written in a non-encyclopedic way (e.g. "expanded to include the rest of the world" is more neutral than "expanded to cover the entire world". "From 2007 to 2015" (dates made up) is more encyclopedic than "more recently"). Simply removing the ad template with no explanation other than "incorrect" is not an appropriate way of action. Cilidus (talk) 19:00, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  Great job incorporating my suggestions and expanding on the article! While I may have come across as condescending, I thought it strange of you to, (a) remove the template with no explanation, and (b) cite the usefulness of the website as an 'excuse' for the promotional tone of the article. I greatly appreciate your ability to seek out and replace additional vague wordings (such as issues with MOS:RELTIME) and I hope my initial response didn't come of as too harsh. Cilidus (talk) 21:37, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: No worries, it clarified for me what you thought were problems with the article, so it was helpful. --Robert.Allen (talk) 23:09, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of [[Template:Ad]]
Talk:City of Gosnells

message: Should the suburb and local government be disambiguated?
I mean, considering they are different scopes and all.  --Spook (my talk | my contribs) 05:49, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd say yes with a but, as it stands the article needs alot of expanding before either are stand alone subjects.  when that happens then it will be necesary the same as other similar burbs like Bassendean Gnangarra 12:11, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Arthur Hutt

message: Which Arthur Hutt was this; when was he born and when did he die?
WB2 05:50, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 
Talk:Paolo Oss Mazzurana

message: Folks, there's an almost identical article at Paulo Oss Mazzurana. One should be deleted, surely? Charivari 05:55, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Half the article is not about Paolo Oss Mazzurana but his descendants. I don't think the Lineage section is relevant so I propose to remove it. --Jaqen (talk) 14:23, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lineage 
Talk:Rize (film)

message: There are large sections of this article that violate WP:ORIGINAL, WP:ENCYCLOPEDIA, and WP:NPOV. I'd actually recommend a full rewrite. -Kudzu1 (talk) 02:42, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problems with tone 

message: someone edited this info. TIGHT EYEZ and BIG MIJO are the wolverine and saber tooth, the mario and luigi, the yin and yang.... somehow they have been replaced. without them no one would know krump... get the facts straight. Tight Eyes is an avatar. strong enough to take it to the world. Mijo is the protector of krump. 204.102.76.146 (talk) 20:27, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  ORIGINATORS
Talk:Thomas Hunt Morgan

message: Please comment if you have any thoughts about improving the article, or getting to pass GA (at least). I'm particularly struck by the heading above which says it's an 'Unknown-importance history of science article.' That verdict ought to be corrected somehow! EdJohnston 19:34, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Morgan's great work was done between 1910 and 1930, in my opinion. Does anyone object to further expansion of the sections now called 'Columbia' and 'Caltech?' Ideally this might involve sub-articles. Because of its importance, I'm wondering if we need a category like :Category:Drosophila genetics. Or maybe a suitable navigation template. At present we DO have a :Category:American geneticists that contains Morgan, Sturtevant, Bridges, Muller, Dobzhansky et al. Actually it is about to contain Dobzhansky since he obviously belongs. EdJohnston 21:39, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can this become a Good Article? 

message: The text about Thomas Hunt Morgan claims that he was born in Canada, yet the sidebar states that he was born in Lexington, Kentucky. Lexington, KY is correct as far as I know. His family lived in Lexington. I don't know where the information about Canada came from.Donchesnut (talk) 15:38, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Done, was probably vandalism. —fetch·comms 17:30, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request from Donchesnut, 28 May 2010 

message: Lead only, may deserve expansion or removal. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:48, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "famous Fly Room"
Talk:The Jesus Christ Show

message: There are more problems than I'd hope to cover with this article, because it's basically COPYVIO'd from  http://www.catholic.com/thisrock/2001/0110eye.asp. The original article has a very strong POV and really is only partially encyclopedic. The article needs heavy cleanup if possible.FA Jon 06:01, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Problems

message: is this a joke???or is it a real radio show?--Tucson 03:51, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is a real radio program. --kidbritish 08:22, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

text: It is very much a real radio show. You can listen to it over the internet from KFI's homepage. IMHO, the guy hosting the show is one of the expert religious folks/experts I have ever heard.  --Ray 00:49, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  is this a joke
Talk:Barking owl

message: If you find anything offensive, incorrect or on sided on my 'Barking Owl' article please be welcome to post here. Also post here if you would like a new section or have more information I can type up about the Barking Owl. 
--Ethan Redshaw 22:40, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notice 
Talk:Gwadar Port

message: I provided a map showing where Gwadar was -- for those of us who didn't know.
Someone removed it -- without leaving an explanation here on the talk page.
I am going to re-instate it.  If you are going to remove it, please explain your objection here.
Thanks!  Geo Swan (talk) 12:56, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment 

message: Name import and export traded gawader port 154.80.26.23 (talk) 03:45, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Social studies
Talk:George Fisher (cartoonist)

message: Someone needs to add some of George Fisher's most famous cartoons to this page. 
One cannot fully grasp who this wonderful man, an Arkansas treasure, was
without showing some of his folksy down-to-earth cartoons. Especially 
the "Old Guard Rest Home." There also needs to be a picture of him.
Also, George's contributions to Arkansas culture were not limited to creating 
editorial cartoons.  He was an excellent commentator on all things Arkansan. As an 
active member of the Rackensack Society George always joined all the evening's performers 
on the stage, guitar in hand, at the end of their monthly meetings where they 
collectively played and sang (and made up verses to) "Down in the Arkansas." 
I'm not positive, but I think George helped found the Rackensack Society, 
an organization devoted to the preservation of the traditional music of Arkansas.WLE 20:55, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Snow Dogs

message: question for anybody who's seen snowdogs... i heard that there are a group of characters in the film who chant "Doom on you."  This is phonetically similar to a vietnamese phrase which translates as "f--k you". Does anybody know more about this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.164.200.84 (talk • contribs)  --Slgrandson 12:45, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Question