lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Steve Scott (poet)

message: I've tried to fix the layout a bit, but I don't know if people want the article to use indents, bullet points, or a bit of both:
Bullet Points
*“I’d walk a million miles for one of your smiles, Mona.” 
**PRISM magazine. Summer. 
Indents
:“What’s the Frequency, Kenneth?” 
::Overground Newsletter. 
Both
*“Am I Really Here, or is it only Art?” 
::Umbrella Magazine. Spring. 
Or...
*“Am I Really Here, or is it only Art?” 
:Umbrella Magazine. Spring. 
Hope to get a few opinions.  --JD[talk|email] 23:48, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Layout
Talk:Temple College

message: I revamped this page, with a new infobox, added the logo, redid the info, updated enrollment and tuition information, cleaned up old stuff, streamlined, removed the pointless list of department heads, added a history, added some sources and an external link, and moved the pictures to a good spot.  It still needs coordinates (look down at the bottom), and perhaps some expansion about emphasis or courses offered, etc.  TuckerResearch (talk) 06:19, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revamp
Talk:Shelley Berkley

message: User:Jerzeykydd claimed he 'cleaned up' this article back in March. What that actually consisted of was merging the campaign material into the US House section in an attempt to trivialize the job itself and bury the important points such as her Committee assignments. This has been some campaign of his (all Senators, all Reps) to make Congress appear to be nothing more than some team sport, putting all the focus on the campaigns. We have separate campaign articles for a reason. He also DELETED the link to the 2010 campaign to make it appear that article didn't exist. This is not editing in good faith, imo.  Flatterworld (talk) 15:26, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: These claims are false. How I'm trying to trivialize the job itself and bury the important points such as her Committee assignments is just not true. I'm not trying to put all the focus on the campaigns or to make Congress appear to be nothing more than some team sport. I was just trying to put all things that related to being U.S. Rep in that section, including the elections.--Jerzeykydd (talk) 18:31, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Structure and sequence

message: After adding a number of citations and cleaning up plagiarism throughout the article, I removed the No footnotes template and added Citations needed templates where they are needed in the article.SteveFromLasVegas (talk) 04:39, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of No footnotes template 

message: It looks like there is a disagreement with the cap-and-trade sub-section of the political positions section of the article. First, I would like to preserve the disputed article content:
:The cap-and-trade regime supported by Berkley is estimated to result in the United States losing 1.145 million jobs overall, 3 million manufacturing jobs, and $9.4 trillion in economic output.
The impasse we have now is that UCSFGreen feels that:
:"Deleted one-sided reference to Cap and Trade, that only mentioned adverse economic effects and not possible benefits."
The economic impact of this issue is extremely relevant to both the subject and the issue—especially when the subject says that her #1 priority is jobs.
Simply deleting content you don't like when you can boldly edit the article is not the answer. Furthermore, UCSFGreen edited the article to include the "possible benefits" of the policy immediately after originally removing the negative economic impact of the policy. And, then removed the content again after I reverted the original edit.
The bottom line is that the economic impact of Berkley's support for cap-and-trade belongs in the article. SteveFromLasVegas (talk) 02:38, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cap-and-trade 

message: She faces several opponents in the primary June 12. "She is expected to be the Democratic nominee and will likely face Senator Dean Heller in the November elections" may be true, but I am not certain that it is, and there is no source cited. Bustter (talk) 17:04, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  2012
Talk:Tom Allen (Maine politician)

message: The article states that he was elected with at least 60% of the vote each time, but in two of the elections with information at the bottom of the article, he is below 60%. Naraht 19:05, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradition 

message: I'm not going to make any edits, but the beginning of this article reads like a campaign ad and needs to be altered.  I'll leave to the politically obsessed to take care of it, but this is definitely a biased article.
Melia Nymph (talk) 01:26, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  This Article Reads Like an Ad 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Page Moved to Tom Allen (Maine politician) (non-admin closure)  Bingobro (Chat) 07:57, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Tom Allen →  – not a clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC based on page views  Joeykai (talk) 06:00, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 8 September 2020
Talk:King Jammy

message: Okay, I just finished cleaning up the discography, but there are still albums which are classified improperly and distinctions which we may not want to make (a section for production, a section for mixing/editing).  There used to be two sections for engineering/mixing, but I grew sick of reintegrating the two... Here are the remaining LPs (chances are, some of them already appear in other categories):
    * Barry Brown & Johnny Clarke - Sings Roots & Culture [197X]
    * Bim Sherman - Lovers Leap Showcase [1979]
    * Bim Sherman Meets Horace Andy And U Black - In A Rub A Dub Style [1982]
    * Black Roots Players - Ghetto-ology Dubwise [1980]
    * Blue Riddim Band - Restless Spirit [1981]
    * Clint Eastwood - Sex Education [1980]
    * DEB Music Players - Umoja [1978]
    * Dennis Brown - History [1985]
    * Dennis Brown - Revolution [1985]
    * Errol Holt - Vision Of Africa [1978]
    * Flick Wilson - School Days [197X]
    * Frankie Jones & Johnny Clarke - Sings Roots And Culture Vol 2 [197X]
    * Heptones - Heptones Dictionary [197X]
    * Heptones - University Of Dub [197X]
    * Horace Andy - Haul And Jack Up [1987]
    * Horace Andy - In The Light Dub [1977]
    * Horace Andy - Natty Dread A Weh She Want [1978]
    * Inner Circle & Fatman Riddim Section - Heavyweight Dub + Killer Dub [1978]
    * Jackie Mittoo - Show Case Vol 3 [1977]
    * Jah Stitch - The Killer [1975-77]
    * John Holt - Super Star [1978]
    * John Holt - Treasure Of Love [1977]
    * Johnny Clarke - A Ruffer Version [1974-78]
    * Johnny Clarke - Superstar Roots Disco Dub [1977]
    * Johnny Osbourne - Mr Body Bye [198X]
    * Joseph Cotton - Dancehall Days [1976-84]
    * Junior Delgado - Dance A Dub [1978]
    * Leroy Smart - Leroy Smart & Friends [1976-78]
    * Mikey Dread - Dread At The Controls [1979]
    * Natural Vibes - Life Hard A Yard [1982]
    * Phillip Frazer - Loving You [1979-81]
    * Prince Alla & Junior Ross - I Can Hear The Children Singing [1976-79]
    * Prince Far I - Megabit 25, 1922 [1985]
    * Prince Hammer - Bible [1978]
    * Prince Jammy v. King Tubby - His Majestys Dub [197X]
    * Prince Jazzbo - In The 70's [1971-76]
    * Prince Lincoln & Rasses - Vortex Dub [197X-8X]
    * Ranking Dellinger - Superstar [1977]
    * Scientist v. Prince Jammy - Big Showdown [1980]
    * Sugar Minott - A Touch Of Class [1985]
    * Sugar Minott - Ghetto-ology + Dub [1979]
    * Tappa Zukie - From The Archives [197X]
    * Tappa Zukie - Living In The Ghetto [1976-78]
    * Tommy McCook & Aggrovators - Disco Rockers [1977]
    * Tonto Irie - Jammy's Possee [198X]
    * U Brown vs Peter Yellow - DJ Confrontation [1982]
    * Various Artists - King Jammy In Roots [197X-8X]
    * Various Artists - Rockers International Vol 2 [1974-75]
    * Webber Sisters - I And I Love You Honey [197X]
--Keep skanking. (Mingus ah um 23:28, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discography
Talk:Pedo-

message: You got rid of my shortcut to pedophilia. :( Skinnyweed 23:33, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed redirect 

message: add new item to section "==Relating to feet=="
 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. --Cameron11598 (Converse) 06:59, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 24 April 2016 

message: *Pedestrian, A pedestrian is a person traveling on foot, whether walking or running
80.112.146.11 (talk) 02:31, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Relating to feet

message: You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Disambiguation#Advice please.  Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:07, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Disambiguation#Advice please]]

message: These pages are redundant. The content at this one is better developed (as a set-index article, more or less), while the other is a very incomplete disambiguation page. However, this bigger page is flawed, in that many words from the various ped- roots do not result in pedo- words but other ped- forms (peda-, pedia-, pedi-, pede-, etc.).  So, the page is simply misnamed.   PS: We should also make sure that all these prefix forms redirect to the same page. — AReaderOutThataway t/c 09:49, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It's also a WP:NOTDICT matter.  We can have an encyclopedic article on a cluster of prefixes and their origin, their confusability, what common words in various language (especially English) are derived from which ped[x]-yielding root, North American vs. Commonwealth English spelling variations, etc., as a "content cluster", but it is not Wikipedia's job (it's Wiktionary's job) to have largely-redundant articles for every ped[x]- prefix.  On WP, they should all redir to the same article, unless and until we can develop sufficient non-dictionarian content to warrant a WP:SPLIT.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  09:18, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

text: NB Albinovanus Pedo would need a  hatnote on the merged article. It's horribly placed as a see-also. Narky Blert (talk) 16:30, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge to [[Ped-]]
Talk:Crystal Mall (British Columbia)

message: The article contained several statements that are unsourced and could be dangerous from a legal standpoint, such as claims regarding closure of stores, popularity and condition of the facility. I was there less than 10 days ago and I saw very few empty stalls, the place was packed (at mid-afternoon on a weekday) and I saw very little "deterioration" as claimed. If someone can find a reputable source to back up these claims, by all means put the information back (cited), but based upon my own "original research" I must delete the statement. I don't know if there is a business equivalent of WP:BLP but if there was, I'd be claiming the deletion under that policy. 23skidoo 22:49, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Deleted content
Talk:Rick Larsen

message: How are you going to address this? Jwcaldwell (talk) 00:09, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kavanaugh perjury
Talk:Campus university

message: Is this in fact a British term. I haven't come across it before, and "campus" itself is an American term.--Ncox 23:36, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's quite common - I suspect the influence comes from the US. Most UK universities refer to the grounds (when they have them) as "the campus". Timrollpickering 00:02, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: It says on the page that campus universities are separate from collegiate universities. I don't know if they mean by definition, or by de facto, however, Lancaster university is both a campus and a collegiate university so the latter is untrue. Nonetheless, I think this needs clarification.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.6.92.141 (talk) 13:49, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: This isn't quite true
Talk:Norm Dicks

message: Why does the policy section keep getting removed by drewtate?  The added votes on the FISA bill are completely factual and verifiable. CharlieInSeattle | Speak 2:44 PM, June 9th, 2008.  —Preceding comment was added at 21:45, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Voting Record

message: The bit about the haircut needs to be cited.  I've removed it until/unless citation provided. -- Jonel | Speak 16:45, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Uncited information removed

message: How about adding info here on his work in the 1980s with conservation and work corps? Kingturtle (talk) 16:01, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conservation 

message: Would an interview with Norman Dicks from 1987 be useful here as an external link? Focus of conversation is nuclear weapons policy. http://openvault.wgbh.org/catalog/V_3056B48591A34A048124B4D2466572DB (I helped with the site, so it would be conflict of interest for me to just add it.) Mccallucc (talk) 21:43, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External link to interview on nuclear policy? 
Talk:Brian Baird

message: The Iraq policy portion of this entry was written by a moveon.org staffer, right?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.82.40.18 (talk) 05:57, August 30, 2007 (UTC) 
: "Constituent response to Baird's position has been overwhelmingly negative." This parargraph is so BS! The left erupts in rage (six hundred people! The vast majority thereof! My God what a maddening crowd!) and their "viewpoint" is somehow passed on to the entire constituency, if not the entire American people. It goes to show that the Investor's Business Daily editorial on the matter (Traitor Against Surrender) is right on the money. Asteriks 09:03, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Folks, the purpose of this discussion page is to improve the article, not chat about our opinions of it. I realize the previous comments were on an earlier version of the article, but I think at present, we have a version that is very much in line with the cited sources (which are two of the region's papers of record.) Anyone with further concerns, please be specific. -Pete (talk) 08:33, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed "There has been strong negative response to Baird's change in position" as commentary.--Jersey Devil (talk) 21:09, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: *Wanna add that info to the page? I thought it be better to ask before adding it his site is still down http://www.baird.house.gov/  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Syler.mi4 (talk • contribs) 07:21, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Baird's website hacked

message: This video of Baird at YouTube has had more than 400,000 views in less than a week, and the video was reported on by Fox News. Grundle2600 (talk) 23:14, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable video of Baird at YouTube has had more than 400,000 views in less than a week. 
Category talk:People from Huntington, West Virginia

message: I removed the references to the two counties in KY, as They would likely claim to be from "Ashland" or "Eastern Kentucky." I can see people from C-K, Proctorville, Lavalette, Chesapeake, and maybe Barboursville fitting in, but not much else.  youngamerican (ahoy-hoy) 23:40, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mitzpe Hila

message: Should Mitzpe Hila go in the category "cities in israel" or "settlements in israel"? Rest 23:44, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why the spelling "Hila" and not "Hilla"? Is this really an "official" spelling? The Hebrew word has a dagesh in the "l", so is traditionally doubled in transliteration, so should be "Hilla". The dagesh is part of the semitic root, "HLL" (whose underlying meaning is "shine"), so it is of symbolic significance.
87.69.227.74 (talk) 07:21, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: The transliteration
Talk:Movsar Barayev

message: Have reverted some vandalism, where someone had replaced "terrorist" with "freedom fighter". What I understand, they self-describe themselves as terrorists, so this is not really POV as all sides claim it. I kept one of the vandals edits, because i can't find a neutral site that backs up that he was into profiteering. -Storkk 23:47, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Old talk

message: Should to dis page. --84.234.60.154 (talk) 07:47, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Barayev]] redirects here

message: --Captain Obvious and his crime-fighting dog (talk) 11:41, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Soemone fix the image
Template talk:Governorates of Jordan

message: Proposal  :            	Template:Jordan → Template:Governorates of Jordan
Rationale :  	Template:Jordan is too vague of a term to describe the governorates of the country. Also, the move would coincide with similar templates (Template:Governorates of Iraq, Template:Governorates of Egypt, etc.)
Proposer :             	334 23:09, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: Please add  * Support  or  * Oppose  followed by a brief explanation and then your signature ("~~~~").
* Support per nom. David Kernow 23:54, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey and discussion
Talk:Meiners Oaks, California

message: The population was 3,571 at the 2010 census, one person more than the 3,750 counted at the 2000 census.
3571 - 3750 ≠ 1
If both the 3571 and 3750 figures are correct, the population dropped by 179. 108.246.205.134 (talk) 06:14, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population error 
Talk:James Esdale

message: I am moving this page to Esdaile, because "Esdale" is a mistake. His surname is Esdaile.
This is confirmed by a wide range of sources, including the catalogues of the Library of Congress & the British Library and, for example, a recent work of high-level "hypnotic scholarship" (Gauld, A., A History of Hypnotism, Cambridge University Press, (Cambridge), 1992) -- all of which show Esdaile (and, more importantly, none of the records that I have been able to consult indicate that Esdaile ever used such an alternative spelling of his surname at any time during his life).Lindsay658 23:55, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history/News/Newsletter June 2006

message: "We have grown from just under a hundred members to nearly 300, and appear to be the second largest WikiProject (lagging, curiously enough, behind WP:COMICS)."
:Wikipedia: Powered by Geeks?Michael Dorosh 23:56, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, very much so! ;-) Kirill Lokshin 00:29, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:The Real World: Key West

message: Should we update their ages as they age? Someone just changed Svetlana's age to 21 because of her recent birthday, and I was wondering if we should stick to the ages of them on the show in case it causes confusion. I'm sure someone can calculate their current age, but it would be better, in my opinion, to keep their age on this page the same it was on the show. Stexe 17:39, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No.  The age should refer to their ages at the time of filming.Nightscream 04:56, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age For Profile?
Talk:Deadlands: Lost Colony

message: The article currently states that Lost Colony used a custom system - but the main book, the only one released (so far) on paper, was dual-statted for Deadlands 'classic' and D20 Mrph 00:17, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  System 

message: I can't find a reference, as it seems to have dropped off the Pinnacle news page, but I remember an announcement that 'reloaded' versions of Hell on Earth and Lost Colony would follow once Deadlands: Reloaded was released. If this can be verified, it probably deserves a mention Mrph 00:17, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lost Colony reloaded?
Talk:Adam Smith (Washington politician)

message: Got rid of bias and out of date section 67.160.106.255 08:54, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal 
Talk:Collaborative fiction

message: The commercial writing part was out of theme, as it was centered on couples of writers and mentioning irrelevant authors. It was hence moved, and shortened.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.170.108.246 (talk) 11:52, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  unfit part 

message: This character was an example of collaborative fiction that perhaps deserves a mention, since he first appeared way back in 1911, and starred in 32 books between then and 1914, a phenomenal output made possible by the fact that two people were simultaneously writing each book. He was at the time enormously popular, was considered iconic by the Surrealist Movement, starred in several multi-part silent movie serials, and was undoubtedly far more significant than some of the works you mention simply because they had two or more authors - 32 novels beats a short story if you ask me!
The two men who wrote the books used the bizarre method of discussing the plot of the novel for a few hours, then going off and independently writing half each, one doing the odd-numbered chapters and the other the evens. Six weeks later they would meet up, each read what the other had written, and write the last chapter together, hopefully uniting the two schizoid plot-threads in a satisfactory way. After one of them died in 1914, a further 11 novels were written by the remaining half of the team, but despite being much more coherent than what had gone before, it was generally agreed that they weren't as good.
If anybody actually reads these comments, you might consider updating the article to include these facts, which you can check in your own "encyclopedia", if you consider Wikipedia to be a reliable source (strangely, many people don't). I know you don't think fictional characters from earlier times matter unless they've had a passing mention in "The Simpsons", but Fantômas is explicitly the direct ancestor of a major character in "The Venture Brothers" which is near-as-dammit! 86.144.29.22 (talk) 05:18, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about Fantômas?