lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Albin Countergambit, Lasker Trap

message: Why does the article claim that Black wins after 6.Qa4+?  Black must play 6...Nc6 to get out of check and protect the bishop at b4.  Now White can respond with 7.fxe3, effectively getting out of the trap.  While the resulting position is by no means favorable for White, it is not obvious that it's a winning position for Black.  Can someone elaborate?
:I think that after 6.Qa4+? Nc6 7.fxe3 Qh4+ 8.g3 Qe4 will win White's king rook and his kingside will be indefensible.  For example, 9.Bxb4 Qxh1 10.Ne2 Bh3. 66.188.128.107 07:19, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: @^ Why should White play 8. g3. Why shouldn't he simply move his King instead? I think someone with more Chess expertise needs to elaborate why White wins after 6. Qa4+. 117.97.126.71 (talk) 04:23, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Something like 6. Qa4+ Nc6 7. fxe3 Qh4+ 8. Kd1 Bg4+ 9. B or Ne2 0-0-0 perhaps. Black has a huge lead in development and White has doubled isolated pawns. I wouldn't claim Black has already won, but he is clearly much better. 213.249.135.36 (talk) 18:23, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

text:  Why not take the now defenseless bishop with 7. Bxb4?--2A00:1028:83D6:8E56:4161:3A38:8A:C6A3 (talk) 00:02, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Stockfish agrees that this is winning for Black, and after 7. Bxb4 gives variations leading to the win of either the Rh1 or the Bb4, with a large material advantage and continuing issues for White, who has no development and an unsafe king. Mkkuhner (talk) 16:22, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Variation
Talk:T'plana-hath

message: VfD wasn't exactly a glowing recommendation and this article hasn't been expanded in nearly two years. It should be merged. Chris Cunningham 09:59, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: VfD decided it was notable enough, that's good enough for me. thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 10:04, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  It isn't good enough for me. It's obvious that there's nothing more to add to this article. Chris Cunningham 10:07, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  So what do you suggest? It's perfectly notable - so if your admitting it is notable and you want it gone/merged due to length what use is a notability tag? thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 10:09, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  To remind me to do it. I'll merge this later. A notability tag is not some personal insult on your editing work, so kindly quit reverting it. Chris Cunningham 10:12, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Wikipedia isn't your blog or storage department - if you can't remember to do it then that's your problem, if you wish to propose a merger (as this is a controversial issue) use  and  (ps: Please see WP:3RR) thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 10:15, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  While I acknowledge that having a day job is "my problem", it isn't grounds for a revert. Three minutes is not an appropriate amount of time to leave a template in place pending discussion. See your talk page. I'd appreciate you returning the template. Chris Cunningham 10:35, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Your welcome to propose a merge with the merger templates however you want to add a template for a totally different reason - that is not acceptable to me - and - if you will forget why don't you write your self a note on your user page. thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 10:45, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Done. It'd be nice if this template was still here in ten minutes' time. Chris Cunningham 10:54, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Just to clarify: I object to a merge. thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 18:01, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Tish Bellomo

message: I think people would more often look for Tish & Snooky or Tish and Snooky and, indeed, the content of the articles on the two sisters is virtually the same.  I propose to combine the two articles into Tish & Snooky and redirect from the two names. --Evil1987 15:57, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger with [[Eileen Bellomo]]
Talk:Batman (album)

message: Information is needed on why little of Prince's music is in the actual film, disappointing many moviegoers expecting to hear more.  -AMR  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.19.112.89 (talk) 03:31, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Pro-Euro Conservative Party

message: :"This was despite a campaign in which the BBC was shown as giving equal coverage with the Pro-Euro Conservative Party as they did to the Conservative Party, and that a number of candidates were shown to be from other parties."
(a) we need a cite for this.  I'm sure the Tory party made these claims, but we need to source it.
(b) what does the last part mean?  "a number of candidates were shown to be from other parties" ??? Morwen - Talk 08:15, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I've had a look and tried to make it a bit more neutral. Mpntod 19:21, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  cite needed 

message: http://news.google.co.uk/archivesearch?q=%22Pro-Euro+Conservative+Party%22&btnG=Search&um=1&ned=uk&hl=en&scoring=a
JASpencer (talk) 22:17, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  News coverage archive 

message: I have removed the statement "Leader John Stevens called the Conservative Party under their then newly elected leader Iain Duncan Smith "a cancer of extremism and xenophobia". At least 25 of its claimed 500 members joined the Liberal Democrats" because it is not supported by the links.  
The 25 figure seems to come from the website of Tunbridge Wells Lib Dems, but does not refer specifically to the Pro-Euro Conservatives.  It includes people such as Emma Nicholson, who defected from Conservative to Lib Dem years before the Pro-Euro Conservatives were even created, and Bill Newton Dunn who was re-elected as a Conservative in 1999 and defected to Lib Dem in 2000, without being a member of the Pro-Euro Conservatives.
The other references refer to approximately 20 (including the leader) joining the Lib Dems and urging members and supporters to follow suit.Danfolkestone (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 15:56, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger with Lib Dems 
Talk:Regulator Movement

message: Under causes is the sentence "Ultimately they brought in state militia to crush the rebellion, and then hanged their leaders" (emphasis added).
Was there truly a state militia in colonial North Carolina?
Snowgen (talk) 19:09, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  State Militia? 

message: I took out this claim:
Judge Richard Henderson condemned the six captured Regulators to death.
Because, having looking at the reference cited I see no such claim. Perhaps it is the late and I am bleary eyed and not seeing it. But it took to me like there there is nothing on the pages numbers mentioned to support this claim. Please correct me if I am wrong. It is late, as I said. Pfly (talk) 05:56, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: unsupported claim

message: In the "causes" section, it has the date 8787.  Does anyone know the correct date to change it to?USMonarchist2008 (talk) 23:54, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible vandalism or typo?

message: Is there any relation to the "well regulated militia" in the second amendment?
:No. "Well regulated" was not used at the time to mean government regulated, but rather well working. "Well regulated" in the Second Amendment is a "prefatory clause" anyway, ie used in the language at the time to mean one of the reasons, not the exclusive reason for a right. EG for example Rhode Island state constitution stating "The liberty of the press being essential to the security of freedom in a state, any person may publish his sentiments on any subject, being responsible for the abuse of that liberty" does not mean the right to making a contention in writing only applied to members of the professional press. N34B2 (talk) 16:17, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second Amendment

message: South Carolina has an entirely separate and different movement --they also called it "regulator". I created a new article on "Regulator movement in South Carolina" and moved most of the relevant text over there. To minimize confusion I recommend renaming this article  "Regulator Movement in North Carolina." -- any comments?  Rjensen (talk) 20:18, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  change title to Regulator movement in North Carolina
Talk:Edward Albee

message: As people were shouting in the streets out of the fear of Birds (this time it was a crow), Mrs. Berger (The Opera Singer) got murdered near the Deutsche Post in her hometown;Frankfurt am Main; where the river Main and its Festivals host a lot of artists and novel people  with wine and events every year. Neverthless a Festival of theatre with different looking actors, playing rolles by "Edward Albee" even when they were asian-looking actors. Noone but "West Side Story" know what made the Fashion designer to kill the Opera Singer. It could be the issues of personal life of Alireza Heydari that were so heavy to listen to; one of the best wrestlers that had to retire or maybe they did not pay the Sweetening room or else. 194.94.134.90 (talk) 15:06, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doggy Opera Singer ft. Jonas Kaufmann: Mrs Berger has been murdered in Frankfurt am Main"
Talk:W. H. L. Wallace

message: What is his name??? 
Is it William Hervey Lamb Wallace,William Hervey Lamme Wallace, William Hervy Lamb Wallace, or William Hervy Lamme Wallace. I have seen all of these spellings on the internet. Anybody know?Falphin 18:28, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Old, unsectioned comments

message: Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
* Oppose. Leave Civil War guys like J.E.B. Stuart, P.G.T. Beauregard, and W.H.L. Wallace alone. That usage is more common in ACW literature. Hal Jespersen 15:07, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Amaurosis

message: Is it the  retinal artery or the ophthalmic artery? (When I merged the Amaurosis and Amaurosis Fugax articles they each had one, out of confusion I kept both and seperated them with a slash). RJFJR 01:23, Apr 30, 2005 (UTC)
:The retinal artery is a branch of the ophthalmic artery. Occlusion of either can cause amaurosis fugax. AED 21:28, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Anatomy
Talk:Øystein Runde

message: This article was listed for deletion on 9 April, 2005. The discussion was closed with the result of no consensus.  This article will not be deleted.  You can view the discussion, which is no longer live: Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/Øystein Runde. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 18:50, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Closed deletion listing
Template talk:House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha (UK) sidebar

message: Template: has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Eixo 13:32, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  TfD nomination of Template:{{ucfirst:House of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha}} 

message: He's not showing up on the list, even though I have him added there. Morhange 20:10, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's because, due to the variable status of the template, it needs adding to other parts too. Don't worry, I'll do it – DBD 20:59, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Prince Friedrich Josias of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha]] 

message: A request for comments which may impact this template has been started at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biographies#RfC on style in royal family templates. You are welcome to comment there. Fram (talk) 14:29, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: RfC notification
Talk:Family traditions

message: Revision of the article commenced - interested editors are requested to contribute. Thanks.--Bhadani 19:10, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revision of the article commenced 

message: On April 20, 2005, this article was nominated for deletion.  The result was keep rewrite.  See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Family traditions for a record of the discussion. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 15:42, 4 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: VfD
Category talk:Female heads of government

message: It is confusing to search Female Heads of State and not find Margaret Thatcher, Indira Gandhi, etc. on the list.  For clarity the better-organized Heads of State page should include Heads of Government, as this is a subset of Heads of State.  If no disagreement in 1 week I will add Female Heads of Government to Female Heads of State list and add a column of other indicator for Head of State.  --Skates61 (talk) 14:04, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There's already :Category:Women rulers, although it's a bit unclear to me exactly where the line lies and whether there should be three categories (heads of government, national leaders, rulers/monarchs) or two or...? Thayvian 11:09, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Confusing

message: Should this category include people who were head of government only for short transitional periods, serving as acting President/Prime Minister/whatever? Specifically, I'm thinking of Nyam-Osoryn Tuyaa, who was acting Prime Minister of Mongolia for about a week. On the one hand, such people haven't actually been appointed to actual leadership (just interim caretakership). On the other hand, they're still holding the reins of power, and carrying out the job's functions. Thoughts? -- Vardion 05:50, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone (accidentally?) deleted much of the end of the article Indira Gandhi, and so the categories were also deleted.  The mistake has been reverted. Shenme 21:59, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Acting heads of government?

message: Should this category include monarchs? The first paragraph does not exclude them, but AFAICS the only monarchs in this category are Azarmidokht and Borandukht who are also listed in :Category:Queens regnant.--87.162.60.187 (talk) 17:52, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Monarchs?
Talk:Spiedie

message: Another significant purveyor of spiedies (when I was growing up in the Binghamton area in the 60s) was a restaurant called "Pancho's Pit", which started in Vestal and later relocated to Johnson City (both suburbs of Binghamton, as are Endicott and Endwell).  I heard Pancho's Pit recently closed after many years at its Johnson City location.
96.57.213.114 (talk) 22:18, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Pancho's Pit

message: I heard that when Spiedies were added to the menu of national chain Olive Garden (as “Spiedinos”), a little investigation revealed that the chain's chef is a Broome County, New York native.  —Fleminra 06:45, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Olive Garden

message: how is this different from the Italian dish called a Spiedino?  (I propose renaming this page)
FiveRings (talk) 22:11, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spiedino  

message: I have removed the qualification that the skewers must be wooden.  I lived in Vestal, New York, from 1962 to 1976.  Our spiedies were always of lamb, and were always cooked using spiedie irons--steel skewers.--Mockingbird0 (talk) 05:24, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Spiedie irons

message: I am a newbie here so I leave this suggestion with the hopes that someone more experienced will know what to do. Here is a good article on spiedies with a good traditional tested recipe. http://www.amazingribs.com/recipes/lamb/spiedies.html Quedude (talk) 18:41, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:COI problems aside, it's too ad-heavy and should not be included per WP:ELNO #5. --Ronz (talk) 17:10, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Spiedies Recipe

message: The photo looks too much like a hot dog bun. Sub rolls are atypical as well, it is usually a small italian loaf or a slice of italian bread. And lastly, Lupo's also played a significant roll which should be mentioned.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.183.48.72 (talk) 10:11, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggested Corrections
Talk:List of historical capitals of Hungary

message: I think we need to count Buda as a capital until 1541 (until the Ottoman occupation) because the Queen, Martinuzzi and their entourage moved out in 1541. I understand that Pozsony had been the capital of Royal Hungary since 1536, however because of the two kings the capitals were "duplicated". What is your opinion?Fakirbakir (talk) 09:49, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with you. There is no coincidence that Ferdinand repeatedly tried to obtain the capital of John's realm unsuccessfully. --Norden1990 (talk) 11:38, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  1536 or 1541? Buda or Pozsony?
Talk:International cricket

message: I recall there were death threats against the English team, but I've forgotten what happened here, can someone add it?dramatic 20:20, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: England v Zimbabwe, 2003 World Cup

message: I have already raised this at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cricket but previously forgot to mention it here. I am proposing a page move. International cricket currently redirects to Structure of international cricket, but I think it makes sense to move the latter to the former (i.e. the article should cover all aspects of international cricket, not just structure). However, the presence of the redirect means that an admin is required to do the move. Are there any objections to this move, before I request it? Thanks. --Jameboy (talk) 00:13, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Page move completed. I was wrong, no admin intervention was required. --Jameboy (talk) 20:13, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Correction - the page move seemed to be successful but only the talk page got moved. Have flagged for admin attention. --Jameboy (talk) 23:46, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed move

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :International Cricket in 2024-25 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at  until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  J947 † edits 03:29, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "International Cricket in 2024-25" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect International cricket in 2024 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  J947 † edits 22:15, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:International cricket in 2024]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Coutts & Co

message: In my view the three pages named Coutts Bank, Coutts & Co and Coutts and Company should be deleted, since all the relevant information is contained in the considerably more complete article: Coutts. Within the UK, Coutts & Co is much more commononly referred to as just "Coutts", and that would seem a more appropriate way of describing the entry in the encyclopedia. Sir George Athelstone II 21:42, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Cyc

message: I marked this article with the Advert template because I think it violates the NPOV and encyclopedic style. Some illustrative quotes:
"The need for a massive symbolic artificial intelligence project of this kind was born in the early 1980s."
"There have been over a hundred successful applications of Cyc"
"It is based on the experience that we often have thought we understood something, but only really understood it after we had to explain or teach it to someone else."
Despite the name, the whole "Criticisms" section is somewhat positive towards Cyc.
This seems to be mostly due to a single user who added large amounts of promotional-sounding edits both to this page and the page for Douglas Lenat in 2017. Brambleboy (talk) 05:02, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reads like an advert
Talk:Protection (Massive Attack album)

message: Where is the verification for this album.--Iclaudius2 08:47, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Millennium (Front Line Assembly album)

message: There's a Backstreet Boys album also called "Millennium". I got to this page via a link for that album, and all of the sudden it starts talking about industrial music and I'm just lost. --æsahættr 08:17, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Backstreet Boys album 

message: Several of the songs on this album contain samples/riffs by other bands like Sepultura or Pantera. Which sample appears on which track is something I'd like to read in an article about this album.
The info is here: http://www.mindphaser.com/index.php?page_id=43
 Brack (talk) 22:10, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Samples by other artists 

message: I'm pretty sure that there is a sample of Metallica's "Of Wolf and Man" on "Division of Mind", as well as the Pantera one.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.217.245.248 (talk) 16:54, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Metallica - Of Wolf and Man sample
Talk:Surface Patterns

message: I propose that Surface Patterns be merged into Millennium (Front Line Assembly album). I think that the content in the Surface Patterns article can easily be explained in the context of Millennium (Front Line Assembly album), and the Millennium (Front Line Assembly album) article is of a reasonable size that the merging of Surface Patterns will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. This is an issue of all FLA singles articles and is discussed on Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject Industrial#Front Line Assembly single discography. There is already a Singles section in Millennium (Front Line Assembly album). IndustrialGiant (talk) 21:57, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, what I had in mind, since I am the author of the Singles section in Millennium (Front Line Assembly album), is leaving the Singles section as it is and redirect Surface Patterns. I agree with you that there shouldn't be added any more information from Surface Patterns. Maybe the formulation of the merger proposal is a bit misleading. IndustrialGiant (talk) 07:55, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Music of West Africa

message: this is very  valuable information its very interesting mwere some of our music come  from ,we jus listen n listen n listen nlisten n listen n not knowin were its comin fro m
Africa XD  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.15.232.108 (talk) 18:56, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This page seems to be a thinly disguised advertisement and to exist mainly so search engines can pick up the links. It contains essentially zero information about the topic of the page. I believe it should be deleted. MichiHenning (talk) 21:53, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed irrelevant image per WP:IRELEV, maybe useful when the article has grown beyond its current length. Stanleytux (talk) 13:28, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Page deletion

message: Hello everyone. I've recently added a little over 1000 words to this article, and it's something to which I'm going to add another 1000 words or so within the next few weeks. If you have any criticism (constructive or other)/feedback/worries, feel free to send me a message or respond here. I'd love to hear your thoughts. Coop253 (talk) 08:53, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Development/Improvement