lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Reichskriegsflagge

message: Sorry, but this is completly bullshit. The Reichskriegsflagge was used from 1867 - 1945 in different versions. The article only describes the flag since 1935.
- Agreed. It was the official flag of the german armed forces (until 1892 of the Navy) from 1871 to 1945 and of the North German Federation from 1867-1872. In some periods it was also the official trading flag on civil ships.
:Fixed. This article needs massive expansion though. The German version is a lot better. Valentinian (talk) / (contribs) 08:07, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I find it amusing that the article contains such a detailed description of the Wehrmacht flag parade as as matter of fact, it is quite similar to the flag parade still daily paraded by Bundeswehr soldiers, with the Federal service flag of course, not any Nazi flag. --84.154.105.221 (talk) 08:27, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Use of Reichskriegsflagge in neo-nazi movement today is missing!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.164.211.92 (talk) 13:51, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing point

message: After the war, Speer was comparatively successful to style himself as sort of a "better Nazi", or "Nazi gentleman". His memoirs were eagerly read by a generation of Germans desperately looking for some proof that "not all had been bad". In fact though, he was integral to the regime like few other people. It is sometimes even said that Speer was the closest thing Hitler had to a friend. Every word in his memoirs has to be taken as an attempt to white-wash himself, and to a certain extent, the regime and its crimes. None of his accounts can be taken at face value and I don't see why he should be quoted here, extolling the meticulous design work of his beloved Führer. -- Seelefant (talk) 23:16, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speer's opinion is entirely irrelevant
Talk:Tunnel View

message: This article fails to state what tunnel view actually is.  --Xyzzyplugh 14:48, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Tunnel View, Yosemite Valley, Yosemite NP - Diliff.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on January 18, 2015. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2015-01-18. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:46, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Tunnel View, Yosemite Valley, Yosemite NP - Diliff.jpg]] to appear as POTD
Talk:Comet (Lincoln Park)

message: This article should be rewritten as it seems more like an advertisement to save the coaster, than about the coaster itself. Spamming is against Wikipedia's policy and should be rewritten to meet requirements. Sawblade05 01:13, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article reads like an advertisement 
Talk:San-nakji

message: Hi, I think that this page should remain solitary.  The suggestion was to merge this page with ikizukuri.  I have already discussed it in that article's talk page.  My own reason that I feel that this page should remain separate is that ikizukuri is a Japanese tradition of cutting up live animals and serving them freshly cut; it's a tradition that simply doesn't exist in Korea. This includes octopus, shrimp, and several types of fish.   In Korea (at least to my knowledge, though I could be wrong), octupus is the only animal that is prepared this way--Korea doesn't seem to have an ikizukuri like tradition of serving different types of sea critters like Japan does.  Anyways, it's totally open for discussion.  :)--Merkurix 14:51, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: About merging

message: Regarding the statement that octopus is the only live food they eat, I know that Koreans eat sanojingeo (산오징어) which is live (still wiggling) squid. You can also get live shrimp in Korean restaurants, although I forget if they are eaten live or killed in front of you. At any rate, I agree that this page should be separate. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 218.153.118.200 (talk) 04:27, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other live Korean food 

message: You know, when I was young, I thought sannakji and sanojing-eo lived in the mountains.. I didn't imagine them growing on trees, but I thought they were freshwater molluscs living upstream in the mountains, in the clear and icy cold waters... At least one friend of mine had had the same confusion, because san can mean alive, but it can also mean mountain. --Kjoonlee 08:34, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You know, I thought the same thing. I mean if you conjugate the 살다 for present tense, it should be 사는 낙지, or 살아있는 낙지 or something. 산 낙지 doesn't make sense to me.Eunsung (talk) 09:42, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Off topic

message: Why does it say, "Many people are willing to drink soju with sannakji"? It seems like it used to say something like, "Despite the noted toxic interaction of soju with nakji, many people are willing to drink soju with sannakji" or something. I'm taking out the "willing".Eunsung (talk) 09:42, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Soju

message: The octopi are dead.  There is no central nervous system intact after this except for some ganglia in the arms.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sega31098 (talk • contribs) 20:17, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course, that would depend on the process in which the sannakji was prepared.Sega31098 (talk) 03:52, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  It is not live food.
Talk:Hell in Christianity

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved (non-admin closure) NW1223(Howl at me|My hunts) 12:11, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Christian views on Hell →  – For consistency with articles like Heaven in Christianity and Hell in Catholicism; further examples are at Special:PrefixIndex/Hell in. Also, that title makes it much more searchable and concise - there's no real point of the word "views" right now. Gaioa (T C L) 10:18, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

text: Support per rationale. Veverve (talk) 10:23, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

text: Support Much clearer scope. Dimadick (talk) 10:36, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

text: Support per proposal. Havelock Jones (talk) 17:09, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

text: per nom. More concise, equally precise/natural. More consistent. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 05:07, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

text: Support per nom. Invinciblewalnut (talk) 13:02, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 3 October 2021 

message: My issue is with the phrase "as some Christians believe". The phrase implies that this is a minority belief. As far as I'm aware, the majority of Christians believe in particular judgement. The Catholic Church officially professes it, and Catholics make up roughly half of Christians worldwide. If it is meaning to refer to denominations and not Christians, should it not instead say "as some Christian denominations teach"? Winter the Mute (talk) 00:08, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should the line "In Christian theology, Hell is the place or state into which, by God's definitive judgment, unrepentant sinners pass in the general judgment, or, as some Christians believe, immediately after death (particular judgment).[1][2]" be changed?
Talk:Gigi Edgley

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 15:54, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: I have removed the Representation and Contact Information as this is not notable in an encyclopedia.--Manticore1 14:58, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: we have three photos of Gigi but not a single one of Chiana, the character she's arguably most famous for. It would be great to have at least one in-character photo. I'm not doing it because i'm scared of SOPA;-) but someone who understands the rules could find some legal picture of Gigi as Chiana to put here and earn my gratitude. Errarel (talk) 11:27, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fotos 
Talk:Erdős cardinal

message: Can someone please disambiguate the term "homogeneous" in this article? I can guess at its meaning, but am quite uncertain.  linas 15:00, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I created Homogeneous (large cardinal property) to answer you. JRSpriggs 08:47, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Homogeneous
Talk:List of programs broadcast by Nine Network

message: I love Wikipedia's articles on Australian Television, they are so bad that I cannot help but laugh. Surely the Nine Network must of broadcast something during the 60's? Retro Agnostic (talk) 18:41, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: LMAO

message: * Talk:The Price Is Right (Australian game show)#Traceability of the program.....????
--222.64.212.26 (talk) 01:22, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Traceability]] of the [[The Price Is Right (Australian game show)]] program ......??? 

message: I notice that if a program is moved before it is aired more than 12 months ago, it is reverted with comment that it should not be moved until it was aired 12 months ago. This is misleading as nowhere in the article does it mention this. Unless such a note is included, I believe it should be moved as noon as it is known that it will no longer be aired.Fleet Lists (talk) 03:45, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: That is fair enough. My only concern with the children's programming that I monitor, is that sometimes they are moved to "former", and then they must return to "current" when they return after only a few months. A general strategy on articles for shows that haven't officially been cancelled is to wait 12 months after their final airing. I just thought this was a good strategy as so many children's programs go off the air, and then return - it seems more logical than constantly changing their status. I am open to discussion. Perhaps there could be a different rule, such as 3 or 6 months? SatDis (talk) 11:52, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I dont really care about the length of time concerned. I think there needs to be something in the article which sets out what is happening so that users know what is going on.Fleet Lists (talk) 11:57, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moving from current  to previous program section. 

message: Article requires cleanup per WP:NOTTVGUIDE and WP:V. I have tagged the article pending cleanup.  // Timothy :: talk  17:08, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article cleanup
Talk:Brent Krahn

message: Putting WikiProject Texas here so the bot will not retag it again. Ingrid 14:51, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Texas
Talk:Sam & Max: Freelance Police

message: We never actually found out anything definitive about Bad Brain's "negotiations" with LucasArts. It might be a bit of a stretch saying that they were negotiating at all, maybe it could be mentioned that Bad Brain was also interested.--Wormsie 23:06, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bad Brain

message: Is there any chance that the "citations" for claims about waves of angry petitions and other inconsequential nonsense were placed by any person at all besides the owners of the blogs and comic strips that the "citations" point to?Randy Blackamoor (talk) 22:50, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: The citations on this page

message: The link to the E3 trailer is dead... does anyone have a new one?
Would be too bad is it was lost...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.241.50.228 (talk) 20:33, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have a copy of it somewhere on my hard drive. Give me a bit and I'll upload it. Coolgamer (talk) 17:09, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

text: Its still available on youtube and downloadable on several fansites. However, a direct link to the trailer isn't realy necessary in the article, although I would not be surprised if it was linked to through one of the references. -- Sabre (talk) 19:06, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  E3 trailer 
Talk:List of programmes broadcast by TG4

message: Are the English language programs on TG4 dubbed in Irish, or only subtitled? -- Andrew 14:10, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: dubbing

message: Has Coconut Fred's Fruit Salad Island aired on TG4 at all? An IP, specifically Special:Contributions/218.215.97.236 is adding this show persistently to the list of shows that had previously aired on this network. In assumption of good faith, however, I have reverted those edits. --IanDBeacon (talk) 18:17, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did this show ever air on TG4?
Talk:List of programmes broadcast by Virgin Media Television (Ireland)

message: This article needs updating..  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jordan353 (talk • contribs) 10:29, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  ... 

message: The list is poor in this regards. This needs to be addressed. Arnkellow (talk) 10:15, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[MOS:FLAG]]
Talk:Shell-and-tube heat exchanger

message: 1 Shell-side - Clarification of the locations at which rhoxV2 is defined.
2 Recommended maximum values.
3 Tube Side - Recommended minimum and maximum values for rhoxV^2 inside tubes to ensure good dispersion of glycol film.
4 Recommended fouling factor to take account of glycol film.
5 Recommendations regarding glycol spray nozzle design. 
For Kettle reboilers: 
1 Recommended maximum heat flux to avoid unstable (film) boiling regime.
2 Maximum temperature difference between tube wall and boiling fluid.
3 Maximum Liquid inlet nozzle velocities or rhoxV^2 value.
4 Number and placement of liquid inlet nozzles.
5 Maximum Vapour exit nozzle velocity or rhoxV^2 value.
6 Number and placement of Vapour exit nozzles.
7 Recommendations for space above maximum liquid level for adequate disengagement of liquid droplets
For Selection of tube material:
1 First sentence is not a complete sentence.
2 What are "Ox" and "Terry"?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.1.234.163 (talk) 13:19, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggested Improvements?

message: I need to know if there is a website to go to to find a chart, spreadsheet, etc that will tell me how many tubes go in different name brand heat exchangers. Thank you Becky Goes Heating Systems  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.16.250.78 (talk) 15:59, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  A chart to tell number of tubes that go in heat exchangers 
Talk:Screamin' Eagle

message: According to the original press release for the ride from 1976, the ride was the longest rollercoaster at that point. Should the "Longest Coaster" box be added to it? I know that the park had a history of exagerating (At one point they claimed the Screamin' Eagle reached 70 MPH) but is their a longer coaster on record that was built before Screamin' Eagle?66.65.243.116 21:18, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Longest Coaster Record?
Talk:Thunder Road (roller coaster)

message: http://www.thestate.com/news/local/article27881743.html
* Carowinds, the dream of developer E. Pat Hall, opened on March 31, 1973. Initial attendance was encouraging but it dropped after a gas crisis hit. Hall sold the park to Family Leisure Centers, which also operated the Kings Island theme park in Mason, Ohio, and Kings Dominion near Richmond, Va. One of Family Leisure’s first decisions was to build Thunder Road – almost a duplicate of the Racer at Kings Island, which opened in 1972, and the Rebel Yell at Kings Dominion, which opened in 1975.
*The lift hill once had “Burma-Shave” signs 
* Cost $1.6 million 
* Ride time 2 minutes, 10 seconds
* The ride’s first cars came from the closed Jetstream coaster in the Riverview Park in Chicago. Designer Dan Holbrook created two fronts for the trains, one based on a 1955 Chevy and one based on a 1957 Ford.
* Thunder Road opened on April 3, 1976. Among the first riders were NASCAR drivers Bobby Allison and David Pearson.
* When the ride opened in 1976 the sign simply said “Thunder Road.” To complete the moonshine theme, two actual stills were procured from North Carolina officials who had seized them. One still was allegedly capable of producing 120 gallons of corn liquor and the other 1,000 gallons of apple brandy,
* In 1981 Thunder Road got a new set of trains.  
* A new sign was installed in 1996: “Fast as Lighting Thunder Road.” 
* From 1995 to 2008 one of the trains faced backward, the other forward. 
* In 2008, Carowinds rebuilt each of the ride’s turnarounds.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.101.5.28 (talk) 03:02, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cite this ref for details from an article about  its final days
Talk:Lakemont Park

message: Does someone local want to add a Boyertown USA description?
Arsonwinter 04:40, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Boyertown USA

message: The article lacked information about the roller rink that was at the park.  It is said to be the oldest in the country.  They started at the same year as the park opened in 1894.  
The roller rink was still in operations until 1980s when they demolished the building due to lack of modernization of the building.
Source: Facebook. https://www.facebook.com/blairhistory/photos/the-roller-arena-at-lakemont-park-in-altoona-was-one-of-the-first-amusement-park/888263041239085/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by RinkFan1 (talk • contribs) 23:53, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lakemont Park Roller Arena.
Talk:Hook, Hart

message: The user who has made these additions has done a good job in doing so. However i think the picture of the horse is slightly inneccessaryChombawomba 14:55, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

message: I don't think you can just claim hook to be a town through the growth. I remember a time when peple used the term 'mini-town' but I'm sure it was still officially a village.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.18.230.221 (talk • contribs) 
:I've changed it to 'large village' as that's what the Parish Council call it. Hut 8.5 19:13, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Town? 

message: There are still a few references to Hook being a town dotted through the page.
:I've changed the ones I could find. If I missed one, then change it yourself - be bold! Hut 8.5 18:23, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Town? 

message: Please reframe from deleting other peoples work that is relevant to the page. This is in relation to the Legends section. Many people would be interested to know legends of the area they live in, or are to visit. Thank you.
:That is irrelevant. The experiences are not well cited and don't seem notable enough for inclusion. Hut 8.5 19:47, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: By 'irrelevant' I mean that the point of 'people might like to know this' is irrelevant. Wikipedia can only document things which are verifiable. As the legends aren't verifiable, by definition, they can only be included if they are notable. The link you added is not a reliable source, as anyone can send things in to the website - how do we know they aren't making it up? If you can find a reliable published work covering the legends, then they can be included. Hut 8.5 20:31, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

text: Religious or paranormal information can be included if reliable sources have commented on it (Roswell UFO incident, for example, has plenty of sources). Whether or not something is true is not the issue here, it's whether enough sources have commented on it for it to merit inclusion in an encyclopedia. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. The external link you added does not meet our reliable source requirements, as anyone can post to that website. Hut 8.5 17:51, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Legends
Category talk:Anxiety disorders

message: 02:45, 2 July 2006 Skinnyweed (Talk | contribs) (: phobias here that can be put into subcat phobias) --ZsinjTalk 15:28, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --ZsinjTalk 15:31, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Connexity Inc.

message: The Shopzilla page has been marked as having qualities similar to an advertisment. How can the information (which is all factual) on this page be rewritten so it does not give the appearance of an advertisement? I don't see it as an ad, so I need some help here. thanks.
:Please leave your details on here, as it makes it easier to track who's doing what. To improve the article, we need to add information such as how the site compares against it's closest competitors, how it makes money, and any significant events in the company's history (good or bad). Basically, it needs to have more info than can be found just by reading the 'About Shopzilla' page on the website. Blowski 22:04, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think a part of the issue is those with that kind of information, such as myself, are actual employees of Shopzilla.  While there is a tremendous amount of detail that I could go into as far as how shopzilla makes money, operations, etc., it is difficult to determine what is for public consumption and what is not.  I think most of us prefer to leave it to external agencies to figure out.  I happen to know that two of the past contributors to the site are also Shopzilla employees...  and they are probably just as mindful of that as I am...  While an advertisementlike entry is not pleasant, it's much more conducive to job security. ;) 69.232.46.20 04:46, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "The company's mission is to enable shoppers to find, compare and buy anything, sold by virtually anyone, anywhere."  This is marketing jargon and boosterism.  Rather than talk about the company's "mission", this article should talk about its business model.   I would like to see this article cleaned up, but I can't do it myself because of conflict of interest.--OinkOink 07:46, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

message: Why is it ok to have names of some similar companies in the "See Also" list, but not others? I feel that its misleading to have half the facts represented in an article. Here's a list of companies which are in a similar business
Shopzilla, Shopping.com, Froogle, TheFind, Shopwiki, PriceGrabber, Kelkoo, Smarter, Yahoo! Shopping
24.6.191.198 06:32, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  See Also links 

message: To tag Shopzilla as perhaps not being a "notable" company is ridiculous.  It's a giant.  If we're going to ban companies from Wikipedia then we should ban companies.  But obvious giants like Shopzilla?  It makes no sense....
Drewhamilton (talk) 02:24, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  If Shopzilla isn't notable what is?
Talk:Bulb Records

message: i am really confused about the whole last paragraph about Steev Mike and the couch thing.  in particular, comments about Couch, like:
Not much is known about Couch, but the Bulb Records site lists the members as Marlon Magas and Mr. Velocity Hopkins. That is unlikely, since they would have been too young to produce the music on the record in 1992. More likely, the band is made up of the label's founders.
i do not understand what this "would have been too young" stuff is about?  is this more characteristic bulb-written misinformation?  i know peter (mr. velocity hopkins), or rather knew him when he was doing couch back then.  he is not too young, and they have been around for that long.  in fact, i seem to remember some early bulb stuff (like the bands prehensile monkey-tailed skink, and cornelius gomez) pre-dating the year 1992 -- but i may have that wrong.
Jon Lon Sito 15:39, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Steev Mike and Couch confusion 

message: Unsourced page; no need for standalone entry, just merge to parent article: Bulb Records. --Another Believer (Talk) 16:09, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: After no objection for 6 weeks, I just did the merge. - dcljr (talk) 04:07, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Bulb Records discography]] into [[Bulb Records]]
Talk:Crystle Lightning

message: Article says she was born on the third, but IMDb says the fifth. Which is it? --Bacteria 15:49, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Birth date