lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Nelson rules

message: I couldn't find the reference stated in the following sentence on the publisher's web site:
"They were first published in the October 1984 issue of the Journal of Quality Technology in an article by Lloyd S Nelson."
Specifically, I looked on 
http://www.asq.org/pub/jqt/past/backissues/1984/october.html
and didn't find any related articles.  Can someone find the correct citation?
* Lloyd S. Nelson, "Technical Aids," Journal of Quality Technology 16, no. 4 (October 1984), 238-239. (See ref 45 in http://www.masteradvisory.com/Small%20Business%20Guideline%20Book%20to%20Quality%20Management.pdf and its appendix D.) -- SGBailey 07:38, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

message: I don't think it is correct to say that these were "first published by Nelson in 1984", as they date back much earlier. See:
* AT&T (1956). Statistical quality control handbook, Select code 700-444. Indianapolis: AT&T Technologies.
* Grant, E. L., & Leavenworth, R. S. (1980). Statistical quality control (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill
Also, there is at least one earlier reference from Nelson (sorry - looks like this is the same reference):
* Nelson, L. (1984). The Shewhart control chart - tests for special causes. Journal of Quality Technology, 15, 237-239  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.8.79.171 (talk) 14:59, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Earlier references

message: Rules 5 and 6 aren't entirely clear. For example, consider this sequence of data where +1 represents a point more than 2 sigma above the mean.
:0 +1 +1 0 +1
It is clear that applying rule 5 at point 3, 2 of the last 3 points are beyond the 2 sigma limit and so the rule is violated. However, if you look at point 4, it is also true that 2 out of 3 points are beyond the 2 sigma limit, so do you count it also? And if you don't, and you restart counting after the rule is first violated, do you then skip point 5 where 2 of the last 3 points are beyond the two sigma limit? In other words, do you only apply rule 5 when the current point being considered is beyond the 2 sigma limit? 57.68.15.178 (talk) 20:12, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Rule 6 overrides Rule 5.--PM (talk) 22:17, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Rule 5 and 6 ambiguous?

message: I've drawn a diagrammatic chart for each of the nelson rules. There is also a poster of all 8 on one canvas on wikicommoms. The diagrams are very similar in size and style of those in the Western Electric rules article but with less colour. Are there any error or can these diagrams be improved upon? --GMcGlinn (talk) 16:30, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The diagram for Rule 3 is DEFINITELY wrong here. Test 3 in Figure 24.8 in Juran's Quality Handbook states "Six points in a row steadily increasing or decreasing" and shows 2 examples, one with 6 points ascending and the 2nd with 6 points descending. The image for Rule 3 absolutely needs to be removed or changed as it is misleading people.--PM (talk) 22:17, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Diagrams
Talk:Friedrich Burgmüller

message: Need the following information added: His birthdate, and the era of time that he was in  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.179.62.209 (talk) 02:16, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Other information needed

message: I've just completed a quick online search and I've discovered that as far as I can tell all the online sources seem to repeat the information in the Wikipedia article. Perhaps of more concern is that there does not seem to be a 'Burgmüller Society' out there to promote his works. I've also tried the Internet Archive to see if there was a period biography, but with no luck.Graham1973 (talk) 17:03, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I pulled a little bit of biography from Philip J. Bone's book and inserted refs where I could. Still some unsourced material, but better. There are many foreign language bios for him on Wikipedia. Might be a way to find other bio resources online.Jacqke (talk) 02:22, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Sourcing Problems
Talk:Johann Friedrich Gmelin

message: There appears to be a claim out there in the Chemical Genealogy Database that Johann's father Philipp was his thesis advisor, see Gmelin's chemical genealogy. The problem with that is that they don't provide a source for that claim, and I haven't been able to find an independent source either. Furthermore, they seem to be unaware of Gmelin's thesis, which clearly states that Oetinger was his advisor. Of course, we cannot exclude the possibility that Johann Gmelin first studied under his father Philipp, and later switched to Oetinger for an advanced degree, but I haven't been able to find any information on that. The problem I have with this is that there are a lot of copycat sites out there: once a claim like that is out there it is copied over and over again, and nobody ever takes the trouble to veryfy that information. In this case it looks like that the Chemical Genealogy Database is the origin of this particular claim, but to me it doesn't look very trustworthy. JdH (talk) 15:49, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gmelin's Chemical Genealogy 

message: Actually article as a whole does a poor job showing the guy in perspective.  (Giving us a feel for how substantial his contributions were amongst fields).
On a practical note, did he draw pictures of animals he identified?  Or plants?  Would be good illos here and off copyright.TCO (reviews needed)  15:19, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  or snakes?
Talk:Johann Heinrich Blasius

message: An empirical formula describing turbulent flow of liquids is named after him.
Probably the formula is named after Paul Richard Heinrich Blasius, not him. -- 89.58.160.243 (talk) 08:35, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  removed sentence 
Talk:Gene fixation

message: Is the 100% frequency more like an ideal assumption, or is it assumed to be really true somehow? Because, with the enormous number of births at each generation, is it really likely that every single locus that had no multiple alelles until then, can safely be considered free of new mutants? --Extremophile 14:19, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 100% frequency?
Talk:Saluki (train)

message: Should this be merged with Illini (Amtrak)? They are essentially the same route. --Elliskev 15:00, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?

message: I have change my suggestion from merge with Illini (Amtrak) to merge into Illinois Service. See comments/discussion at :Talk:Carl Sandburg (Amtrak). In a nutshell, the six routes that make up the Illinois Service are really just components of that service. I think a nice article could be made from the collection of start class articles. --Elliskev 14:05, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Modified merge suggestion

message: As someone who just stumbled on this article. Can I ask some questions?
* You give a route length (499 Km), but no journey time. How long does it take end-to-end?
* How often does it run (once per day, ever hour, or what)?
* Is there any difference between the Illini and Saluki?
A map of the route would be useful. TiffaF 12:47, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Journey time and Frequency?
Talk:Vijay Iyer

message: This source and others state that he was born in Rochester; this one and others give Albany; and an IP user has added Fairport twice. Is there strong evidence for one of these? EddieHugh (talk) 23:55, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where was he born? 
Talk:First United Methodist Church of Umatilla

message: The Methodist Episcopal Church, South split in 1844 from the Methodist Episcopal Church over the issue of slavery. The word Episcopal in their names referred to the fact that they had bishops. They were not part of the Episcopal Church. They reunited in 1939 as The Methodist Church and later became the United Methodist Church. The Umatilla church was listed on the National register as Methodist Episcopal Church, South, at Umatilla, also known as First United Methodist Church of Umatilla. Somehow the article got named South Methodist Episcopal Church at Umatilla, which was completely wrong. Anyway, I have renamed the article to reflect the current name, which is the most easily understand. clariosophic (talk) 03:41, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Name of church
Talk:Al Miller (racing driver, born 1921)

message: Is/was this person ever commonly referred to as "Al Miller II"? Or was he just "Al Miller" and he's just identified as "Al Miller II" in some stats sources (e.g. indy500.tjs-labs.com) to distinguish him from the other Al Miller (Al Miller (racing driver born 1907))? Racing-Reference suggests his name was just "Al Miller". If he is/was not commonly referred to as "Al Miller II", then I propose this article be renamed to Al Miller (racing driver born 1921). Comments? DH85868993 (talk) 10:59, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:Inscape

message: Although I tend to agree that Thomas Merton was, as characterized, a "literary genius," this is a value judgment which is not objective and which adds nothing to the subject of "inscape." WhirledWords (talk) 14:05, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Genius

message: re suggestion that the article Inscape be merged with Instress -- see talk page for Instress. Agree per Budhen (talk) 20:15, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger
Talk:Bobby Marshman

message: It is fair comment that race car drivers took a casual attitude to safety in the sixties but racesuits were primitive or unavailable - see Nomex which wasn't tested until 1965. The death of drivers in fiery crashes, notably those of Fireball Roberts at Charlotte, and Eddie Sachs and Dave MacDonald at Indianapolis, all in 1964, meant something had to be done. There is a long list of drivers who died due to fire - too long to document. Sadly some of them long after better equipment was available but not mandated. Somebody had to die before helmets, roll bars, safety belts, fuel cells, firesuits, HANS devices etc were developed. There is always a faction in racing that says it is about taking risks and safety campaigners are wimps. Rupertlt (talk) 17:48, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Safety
Talk:Allen Crowe

message: I was there the day Allen died at New Breman. About 12 yrs old, in the infield, supporting my Uncle Jack Vitte's #59 . Allen's car spun and backed into the wall between two other cars all together. The fire seemed to start immediately, only obvious by the fiberglass and rubber smoke and was terribly hot, no one could get close enough to help him. They were into the outside wall between 3 + 4.Pretty awful thing to witness, and I had just gotten his autograph earlier. ..he was sitting on the ground leaning against the fence on the family and sponsor side of the put fence..only usac licensed crew, owners and drivers in the live pit..seemed really nice to a kid. RIP 2603:9000:D500:9A82:73E3:A4BC:7DA:7E63 (talk) 01:11, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  I was there
Talk:Westfield Eastgardens

message: The Shopping centre is located in Sydney's south-east.
https://www.scentregroup.com/our-customers/westfield-destinations/westfield-eastgardens 2405:6E00:289:B4FC:8517:E35F:71FC:1A99 (talk) 13:03, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  South-East
Talk:Larissa Hodge

message: I've added the proposed deletion template to this page. If there are no improvements or objections in five days, the article will be deleted. Please keep discussion of deletion within this section. Mcr29 20:55, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Edit summary shows an objection to deletion, favoring a merge. A merge with what? The show's article? Mcr29 00:31, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

text: Well, merge whatever scant information can be merged, and then a redirect to the main FoL article. Actually, I'm just going to go ahead and redirect all 3 pages that have been created for FoL contestants. Ckessler 05:55, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed deletion
Talk:Al-Khaleej FC

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Sennecaster (Chat) 04:42, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Al-Khaleej FC → ? – At the logo and the url of the website says "Khaleej Club". At the History page they wrote that the club was renamed to "Al-Khaleej Club". But at no page of the website is an "FC" mentioned because this is a multi sport club. 
I'm not completely sure with the correct name, there are 3 different version which I found.
#Khaleej Club
#*Logo
#*URL
#*International Handball Federation (2022)
#Al-Khaleej Club
#*History page
#Al-Khaleej
#*International Handball Federation (2023)
#*Goalzz
I personally would prefer option 1 because this name is written at the logo. 🤾‍♂️ Malo95 (talk) 13:03, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

text: Relisting comment: User:ΕυστάθιοςΧ, can you comment here? Schierbecker (talk) 05:06, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 14 August 2023
Talk:Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom

message: I don't understand why the actual text isn't included in the article.  In fact, unless I overlooked it, not even a link to the actual text given. (An image of the bill as proposed to the VA Gen. Assembly in 1777 can be found here: http://www.loc.gov/exhibits/jefferson/images/vc66.jpg and of the Act as passed in 1786 can be found here: http://www.loc.gov/exhibits/religion/f0510s.jpg )
Is there a better source for the summary, which is unclear? Also, Madison's name lacks a link and Jefferson is cited as the statute's author in the illustration caption.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.71.246.219 (talk) 21:50, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There was considerable debate over the statute, which is worth describing.  (Unfortunately, I have no references with me to use as the basis for a section.)  71.41.210.146 (talk) 04:52, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs legislative history 

message: "The 793 word statute is divided..." Is that level of detail really necessary? dachshund2k3 (talk) 01:01, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too specific? 

message: Has the Statute been superceded or repealed or amended in some way since its passage, or does it remain in full force today? Either way, the answer should be explicitly stated in the article. Any objections?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.173.240.133 (talk) 00:43, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Today's status
Talk:Province of Silesia

message: Added on annexation but more will come.--Molobo (talk) 16:39, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added on annexation 

message: Was this province briefly recreated in that period? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  19:31, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  1939 - 1941 

message: Consider making the list into a table, with a column or colour-code for current country, and a column for cities and towns within each district. See discussion of a related category at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 April 19#Category:German Silesia. – Fayenatic London 10:42, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of districts
Talk:South Prussia

message: see http://users.foxvalley.net/~goertz/faqpos.html
There is a paragraph on the current version that suggest all Germans who lived on noble lands were Hauländer while all those on crown lands were Kolonisten.  This is too broad a paintbrush to use as many of these Germans in both categories lived in a Schulzendorf.  Neither term applies to that category of settler.  - Jerry Frank
205.206.215.65 (talk) 20:20, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Manny Ayulo

message: Photo is not Manny Ayulo. It is Bill Vukovich.JThur1 (talk) 20:25, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe you are correct. I have removed the photo. Thanks! DH85868993 (talk) 02:04, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo
Talk:Province of Brandenburg

message: I have a doubt. The article says that Charlottenburg was the capital city from 1918 until 1946, but we all know that in 1920 it became effectively part of Berlin with the Grosse-Berlin-Gesetz. So, following the logic, Berlin would have became Brandenburg state capital.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.230.93.154 (talk) 00:15, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Jack McGrath (racing driver)

message: Here's a link to back-up the assertion:
:http://indy500.tjs-labs.com/list-qual-streak.php?streak=5&sort=A&minyear=1950&maxyear=1964
I consider the Roadster Era to span from 1950 to 1964
--Mycroft.Holmes 21:27, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Best 5-year Starting Streak in the Roadster Era

message: Here's a link to back-up the assertion:
:http://tjs-labs.com/indy500/fast-qual-career.php?minquals=5&sort=F&minyear=1950&maxyear=1964
I consider the Roadster Era to span from 1950 to 1964.
A qualifier's normalized speed is considered to be his qualifying speed divided by the field average for that year.
--Mycroft.Holmes 22:00, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Fastest Overall Qualifier in the Roadster Era
Talk:Visual rock

message: Are we all in agreement that visual rock and visual kei are directly related?- Oct. 30 2006 8:59 User:Blackout45
* I would say yes, especially considering that Gene Simmons is one of the founders of the Visual Kei genre in Japan.Allegrorondo 18:42, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think its fair to say visual rock in general is an "Americanized version" of visual kei. American visual rock predates visual kei therefore I think it would be more fair to say Japanese visual kei is American visual rock's counterpart. Furthermore, Not all the bands listed here are American. Could these bands be better described as Western Visual rock? Must locational origin be cited at all? If so, I think it would be better to split this article into subcategories to which visual kei and glam rock would belong.--Jbluex 14:48, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Visual Kei 

message: why are the gorillaz mentioned so often as an example of an American Visual rock band? Both creators of the musical act, one of which who is the main vocalist, Damon Albarn, are from the UK.--Jbluex 14:50, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gorillaz
Talk:Province of Prussia

message: :de:Provinz Preußen states that Provinz Preußen was originally used for East Prussia (Ursprünglich wurde der Name nur für Ostpreußen verwendet.). However, :de:Ostpreußen states that the Duchy of Prussia became known as Altpreußen in 1701, and the province created in 1773 became "East Prussia" (Das bisher Herzogliche Preußen wurde nun Altpreußen genannt ... Aus Altpreußen und dem Ermland wurde am 31. Januar 1773 Ostpreußen, jetzt offiziell so genannt.) Olessi 17:11, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Province of Prussia"
Talk:Province of Hohenzollern

message: Why was this a Prussian possession if it was deep in Wuerttemberger territory? Brutannica 18:21, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The Revolution of 1848 had been rather successful in Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen and Hohenzollern-Hechingen. So, instead of risking to be deposed by democrats, the princes sold their countries to the King of Prussia, who belonged to the same family anyway (House of Hohenzollern). Prussia, with its large military, had no problem suppressing the revolution. The princes got to keep their privileges as members of the nobility and received a lot of money. Prussia's main interest was probably the squashing of the revolution, because if the revolution in Hohenzollern had been successful, it might well have strengthened democratic movements in other countries. Chl 18:11, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: And it was from this tiny region where the House of Hohenzollern originated. - 52 Pickup 21:44, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Why to Prussia?
Talk:Province of Hanover

message: I propose we merge History of Hanover into Province of Hanover. I propose this because splitting these two articles makes it difficult for readers to get all the information. Since Hanover is a former province, there isn't really any point of having two articles. --I dream of horses (T) @  18:31, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The land of Hanover only existed as a province for 80 years. Before it was an independent country, during a long period of time connected to the British Empire by a personal union. It has been occupied and annexed after a Prussian aggressive act which was not legal. I really have big problems reading the history of my home country in an article Province of Hanover. After dissolving Prussia the former Province formed the Land of Hanover before being united with its neighbours to Lower Saxony. I propose to change the title of this article to Land of Hanover. -- Hotti4 80.228.22.56 (talk) 18:12, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: "Land" is an unfortunate choice in English, since it has a slightly different sense or implication from German; it implies an ill-defined territory, characterized geographically or demographically, rather than a politically organized entity.  I would suggest State of Hanover instead.RandomCritic (talk) 06:33, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: On further consideration, it is evident that moving the History of Hanover article into Province of Hanover, an article intended to refer only to the Prussian-dominated portion of Hanover's history, was an error.  I have corrected it by reverting to the previous state of affairs.RandomCritic (talk) 06:47, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger prosposal 

message: This, and many other Wikipedia pages on Germany, are badly in need of a German-English translator. James Galloway (talk) 00:58, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  English
Talk:Prices of production

message: ""equalising tendency of the rate of profit", " can we find a reference? --137.73.90.244 15:00, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Province of Upper Silesia

message: On Demographic, Nazi times, atrocities.--Molobo (talk) 16:23, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  I expanded 

message: Source is in the reference - it describes it as "Nationalverschiedenheit" - can our German users explain what exactly it means (is it more like ethnicity or more like national identity)? Because this data had no "Silesians" category, I assume it is more about national than ethnographic groups. Peter558 (talk) 13:16, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  I added ethnic or national structure in 1819 (probably the earliest census data)
Template talk:World Heritage Sites in Germany

message: I separated the sites into three main regions. Germany is a bit too large to have them all in one list. Grouping them according to their geographic region also makes sense for those who travel there. --Axt (talk) 10:36, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Fine, I guess, if it's split by region, but can we keep the official names of the sites according to UNESCO?? Reywas92Talk 22:55, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Roberto Corbin

message: The image of Corbin is hard to make out. It should stay but we should also add a face photo (close up portrait). - Pernambuco 15:04, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled