lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Saint Petersburg Metro

message: Here they are:
*http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Kirovsko-Vyborgskaya_Line
*http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Moskovsko-Petrogradskaya_Line
*http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Nevsko-Vasileostrovskaya_Line
*http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Pravoberezhnaya_Line
*http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Kupchinsko-Primorskaya_Line
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Kuban kazak (talk • contribs) 02:37, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Station Templates

message: — Preceding unsigned comment added by SmackBot (talk • contribs) 00:45, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: Was this bombing religious, islam inspired?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.78.243.206 (talk) 07:55, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bombing 
Talk:Orlické Mountains

message: move to Orlické hory. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 10:19, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Which name is most used in English?--Aervanath (talk) 05:59, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, what do English-language reliable sources call the mountains? -GTBacchus(talk) 14:41, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: page moved.  FromCzech (talk) 19:17, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Orlické hory →  – Orlické is the most common name in English, but it is a common convention to translate the georelief type, and therefore the current name is inconsistent with other names in Central Europe. See Category:Mountain ranges of Poland, Category:Mountain ranges of Slovakia, Category:Mountain ranges of the Czech Republic. FromCzech (talk) 07:26, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 8 April 2022
Talk:Hoboken, Antwerp

message: I really think this, although quite amusing, constitutes a POV:
''
Belgium to this day still clings to a high tax policy that almost rivals that of France with its stupid, narrowminded, "dreaming of days of yore" like Jean de Florette, and practically incites widespread tax evasion.
The people are lovely, except for one old member of the Vlaam's Blok, who runs a corner shop and isn't even nice to white people.''
FoekeNoppert 11:55, 31 October 2005 (UTC)

message: this article is pretty time. You reckon you could find a bit more detail on it and then add some of that to the lead? I'd feel more comfortable giving it a tick after that...cheers, Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 05:24, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll have a dig around. Miyagawa (talk) 18:50, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Expanding
Talk:Hypothermia

message: Why does the winter section talk about winter being "from November to March"?  There's an entire half of the planet where winter is June to September.  Simply putting, 'during the winter months' would be sufficient without adding an unnecessary (and incorrect) definition.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.146.44.220 (talk) 18:50, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition of 'winter' 

message: Some sources refer hypothermia as an injury. Is it? 88.235.221.160 (talk) 15:28, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is hypothermia an injury? 

message: "Covering the head is effective, but no more effective than covering any other part of the body"
According to the researchers... Do they know about thermal camera imaging? Did they use one? Embarassingly simple minded research which they disregard the naked human form when viewed with such a camera. 
To limit heatloss best, you cover the hottest parts detected. This will always be the core survival areas: the face first (including ears), torso front second, hands third and if possible feet fourth. All others areas with have constricted blood supply to limit loss. 
As a side note: If those "researchers" understood this, then rubbish like their findings would not be in wikipedia. Since it is in the guardian as the source, it somehow becomes gospel. 
Their incorrect 'science' should not be included.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.32.145.64 (talk) 18:01, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Science for the Plebian
Talk:ICT

message: If you search for ICT in Wikipedia you are redirected to the (generally well-written and complete) article on Information Technology. However in search of accuracy IT and ICT are not equivalent.
In order to correct this, I have created a new article at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_communications_technologies which addresses ICT in its own right.
I am requesting that the redirection for ICT to IT be removed in order that ICT can be viewed in its own right.
I am happy to discuss this further.
Cordially,
Atenyi 14:05, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:War savings stamps of the United States

message: Pictures of the stamps themselves may be of interest.  Also, those offered by the historic peace churches would be helpful too. Surv1v4l1st (Talk|Contribs) 03:18, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures? 

message: I believe Canada had a similar program.  Thoughts on a Canadian section? Surv1v4l1st (Talk|Contribs) 17:17, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canadian Stamps? 

message: I have a us govt thrift card and one stamp inside it. its interesting, probably copyright free due to age and/or govt origin. ill try to scan it and add it. mercurywoodrose.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.234.122.26 (talk) 04:57, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Images

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Joan of Arc WWI lithograph2.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on May 25, 2012. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2012-05-25. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! —howcheng  {chat} 16:37, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Joan of Arc WWI lithograph2.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon
Talk:G. K.'s Weekly

message: Four publications; I'm redirecting them all here for the moment. G.K.'s lasted longer than the others, arguably (I'm not quite sure whether The New Witness made it past 1923). Charles Matthews 12:17, 31 October 2005 (UTC)

message: "Right at the end of his life G. K.'s Weekly in editorial comment on the invasion of Abyssinia seemed to go further..." Further?  Further towards what?  It's unclear. --66.107.93.194 20:47, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chesterton as editor... 

message: The final paragrah reads:
"Private Eye, the British satirical and investigative magazine that is in a sense a remote descendant of the publications discussed above, has similarly been called anti-Semitic. Though Private Eye has pursued figures such as Robert Maxwell and James Goldsmith, that is a charge more easily deflected in the absence of any equivalent of distributism, the economic theory proposed by Belloc and the Chestertons."
Can anyone justify (1) the connection between Eye and GKW and (2) the link between distributianism and anti senitism. If not I shall remove the [entire section as it makes no sense to me.
--John Price 09:51, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:   Private Eye / Distributionism 

message: Have deleted the following as it seems to bear no relevance on either the article subject itself or the context in which Orwell is mentioned:
Fifteen years later A. K. Chesterton would attack Orwell in the pages of The Weekly Review, over a hostile review  in The Observer of a 1943 book Lest We Regret by Douglas Reed, and Orwell hit back in the pages of Tribune.
If anyone can see any reason for it belonging in the article, please paste it back. --Technopat (talk) 21:36, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleted seemingly irrelevant sentence... 
Talk:Sarah Manners

message: can someone who knows indicate birthyears? Amo 01:53, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sibling ages

message: was that a radio thing? cos if it was it would be on radio 4, not radio 1. and it would be good to specify the medium. Amo 01:53, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Afternoon play
Talk:Marcus Scribonius Libo Drusus

message: Libo Drusus was accused of plotting against the Emperor's life through the practice of necromancy; he didn't do
anything more according to Tacitus than employ the services of a necromancer and inquire after the time of Tiberius'
demise; it was after this incident I think that all inquiries through divination as to the time of death of the Emperors were
deemed a capital offence. The case of Libo Drusus' trial is important according to Tacitus because of the fact that it was
the first instance of delatio, i.e. of snitching against fellow citizens in the interests of the absolutist rule of the
Empire, a phenomenon which grew to gigantic proportions only to culminate to Domitian's Terror, which Tacitus survived. I
think these two issues are too important to ommit in an article about Libo Drusus; his case is becoming more significant with
these taken into account. Lucius Domitius 13:00, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Unopposed move   (t · c) buidhe 08:40, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Marcus Scribonius Libo →  – This is the name whom this person seems to be best known by. All other languages of Wikipedia seem to use this. Its also a little confusing to talk about his loss of the name "Drusus" if the name is not actually in the title. ★Trekker (talk) 17:41, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 4 July 2020
Talk:Paul McCartney's Liverpool Oratorio

message: Hello, 
A new interview was deleted from the page. It made the page and album more contemporary, a piece from We Are Cult.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emnetinlurve (talk • contribs) 02:36, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The larger issue is that you have been violating WP:REFSPAM, using IPs and a couple of registered usernames to pump up the web presence of Eoghan Lyng. We are still talking about what to do with you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Linkspam citing Eoghan Lyng... Filter? Any inclusion of Lyng's work would be an insult to Wikipedia because of the systematic way that his writings have been added, for the purpose of puffing up the web presence of Lyng, as opposed to educating the reader. Binksternet (talk) 02:51, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleted section
Talk:Marieluise Fleißer

message: Dvyost's edit of this sentence to read, "After their premiere in Berlin, the plays caused a scandal..." seems ambiguous.  Neither play was produced in Fleisser's home-town, and it was partly the Berlin productions themselves - which were quite sexually explicit - which caused the controversy, stirred up by the right-wing press.  I intend to expand the article.
Skeowsha 13:27, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds good--go for it!  --Dvyost 14:37, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Premiered in Berlin...
Template talk:Infobox book

message: The documentation says:
It appears that  added the  parameter in 2006 as a nonfiction analogue to .
I think the documentation should be changed, removing all notion of using formal index terms. Specifically, I don't think Library of Congress Subject Headings should be displayed to users. Rather, they're for librarians and computers. I think we should prefer "14th-century Europe" as a subject, rather than "Civilization, Medieval--14th century".
What do others think? Are their consumers of the information in subject field beyond article readers that we should consider? Daask (talk) 13:44, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see that it specifically recommends LOC headings for that parameter? Nikkimaria (talk) 04:25, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text:  The documentation doesn't specifically recommend Library of Congress Subject Headings, but that is the most widely used controlled vocabulary system listed at . Perhaps what needs improvement is not so much the Template:Infobox book/doc documentation but rather the index term article. I understood the subject of that article to be a controlled vocabulary based on the statement , but later the in the article it says  Daask (talk) 16:50, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't recall ever seeing anything in this parameter that was recognizably not freely assigned - my suspicion is that people are just following the general meaning  of "subject" in going with free assignment. Nikkimaria (talk) 00:38, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Index terms in subject parameter 

message: In case the above proves to be unworkable, another option is to create a temporary tracking category of articles using infobox book without a short description. Creating 12,000 manual SDs is actually not that bad of a task. You can usually copy/paste/edit something from the lead or use the SD helper gadget to import and edit the Wikidata SD. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:24, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: At this point, this is what I plan on doing. Ive created a really janky UI that lets me change the automatic ones in case of a parsing error. I’ve been sick so I haven’t finished it sooner than I wanted, but by tomorrow i should start publishing them. -1ctinus📝🗨 19:33, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

text: I am starting to publish them. So far I have about ~500 done, including all that start with j, z, x, g, and q. -1ctinus📝🗨 13:53, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: An option to keep off to the side in case the above blows up
Talk:Latamber

message: This was such a great feeling after reading this i loved this so much that tears came into my eyes a village i used to hate so much now when i am abroad and cant go there miss it a lot but this information was so true that i felt like i am there. thanks wikipedia
The source seems to come from:
http://www.apnakhattak.tk/
hello, i am a latamberian, i have good feeling for my nation/village but now adays ,some extremist people want to lead and want to control the management of the village ,which mislead the young and next generation.
  dr.danish khattak from wali khan banda.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.153.87.197 (talk) 10:15, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
Talk:1950 British Empire Games

message: Hi
I have a bronze medal won by G. FOX in the 1950 British Empire Games in New Zealand. Does anyone know for which sporting event this was won ?
Thanks Brian
Couldn't find it on the official site. Anywhere. Feel free to have a look though. Closest was a K. Fox, but that was winning a Silver Medal for Australia. http://www.thecgf.com/games/tally_country.asp?gameid=5 jkm 05:16, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: See Talk:All-time medal tally of Commonwealth Games for discussion on this and other related merges. Kevin 04:56, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge 

message: I almost assessed the article as C class, but feel that it could do with some more prose to complement the fairly thorough tabulation of results. dramatic (talk) 01:38, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: According to Commonwealth Games#Approved sports, water polo was contested in 1950.
There is no mention about it in this article, though. Why is that? 85.76.102.33 (talk) 07:47, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  water polo? 
Talk:Norwalk, Connecticut

message: I'm planning to re-do the whole history section, with mostly a summary of the already existing page History of Norwalk, Connecticut. Currently the history section only mentions the history behind the naming of "Norwalk". 
I'm seeing if there is a consensus before I make a major change to a page I don't have the best history with. —JJBers 18:26, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it's been 4 months (nearly 5) and nobody said anything, so I just did it. —JJBers 13:10, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  History section 

message: I would like to add Gallagher Estate. There is a fine entry in a site outside of Wikipedia. Can I make the reference? From my spot checks, I have noticed that Wikipedia references are all from Wikipedia. RayJ (talk) 13:05, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  New entry in attractions
Talk:Action Party for the Independence of Kurdistan

message: new article
*Temp page moved to main article. Kurdistan Independent Party KIP 07:33, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Iwan Fals

message: can somebody make the 'f' in fals a capital. I.e. Iwan Fals? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.114.226.174 (talk • contribs) 
:Done. *drew 08:15, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tie (music)

message: How about merging this with  Ligature (music) ? Peter S. 14:31, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: As a professional musician, I have never heard a tie (or slur) referred to as a ligature, despite what it says in the ligature article. Most people use "ligature" exclusively to refer to early-music notation. —Wahoofive (talk) 16:08, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge: [[Ligature (music)]]

message: Is the tie in the 18th bar of this music  (see the 1959-2.gif image in that download) allowed between the D (1/2 note, I guess it should be a 1/4 note, but whatever) and the subsequent D (1/16th note) in this E-flat major treble clef staff? The free software Rosegarden program 
doesn't seem to allow me to enter it . Can ties be "across" other notes that are played in between? PeterKnaggs (talk) 18:11, 4 December 2010
:Seems like a legitimate tie between the half (yes, half makes sense there) and the sixteenth in the same voice. I don't know if you need to do anything special for divisi passages in Rosegarden— haven't used it. __ Just plain Bill (talk) 23:30, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  When are ties allowed?

message: Why and where does this article need additional citations for verification? What references does it need and how should they be added? Hyacinth (talk) 23:52, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional citations

message: It would be nice to see an example of 'Several notes in succession can be tied together. Such a succession can also be part of a larger, slurred phrase, in which case, ties and slurs must be used simultaneously and distinguishably.' 31.48.111.59 (talk) 14:57, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Example?
Template talk:Inc

message: What's "Inc"? User:logixoul 14:32, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Incomplete. ¦ Reisio 18:55, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It's unintuitive... but I guess  would be too long to type in many places, in many comparison pages... --logixoul 16:17, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Fix MediaWiki so we can use  and I will be your great friend. :) ¦ Reisio 19:47, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Can't we? Template:? exists, here's how it looks included:  . Currently it doesn't seem to have any purpose. How about moving Template:Inc to Template:??--logixoul 10:12, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done - now we just have to remove  and  inclusions. ¦ Reisio 19:05, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --logixoul 18:25, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: Isn't this the same as Template:N/a? User:logixoul 14:32, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: No, N/A has a very specific, separate meaning: not applicable. ¦ Reisio 18:55, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, I thought N/A meant Not Available. --logixoul 16:17, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redundancy
Talk:East Side West Side (TV series)

message: Wow I'm glad, surprised, and thankful people added to this topic.  I'm generally used to a votes for deletion for topics I want to know about.
Now I have to ask 'cause I can't find anything more about the show, is the show related at all to the East Coast / West Coast rapper wars?  If so, then how?  (Of course you can put the answer in the article if you prefer)
DyslexicEditor 14:33, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see how that's possible, since that happened decades after this show aired. Presumably the title simply refers to the east and west sides of New York City. And to speculate, perhaps this show's title was inspired by the name of the enormously popular musical West Side Story. HollyAm 01:56, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A request for comments has been started that could affect the inclusion 
or exclusion of episodes and characters, as well as other fiction articles. Please 
visit the discussion at 
Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(fiction)#Final_adoption_as_a_guideline. Ikip (talk) 11:17, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for comment on articles for individual television episodes and characters

message: Moved from East Side/West Side to East Side/West Side (1963-1964 television series). I added years (1963-1964) and a type of content (television series) to bring it in line with similar-named productions; Mikus (talk) 19:57, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved the article
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Ferret Crossing

message: I (the article's original author) have removed the self-reference (which I presume was the reason for selection of deletion)
*The nomination for deletion was for "nn" = "not-notable."  Not every topic is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia.  Please look over the Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not article.  If you can provide additional information to support the notability of your topic, add it to the article.  You can also present your arguments for keeping the article in the discussion page.  Please sign all comments in talk/discussion pages by adding ~~~~ after your comment. - Dalbury 19:13, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Ryman Auditorium

message: I've heard that the Ryman Auditorium is haunted. Should that be mentioned? - 12.150.117.30
:Here's a good source: . Kaldari 16:02, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Haunted

message: I made a minor correction to the article.  The "Johnny Cash Show" was not filmed at the Ryman Auditorium; it was videotaped there.See
*http://www.nashvillescene.com/nashvillecream/archives/2014/08/18/19-must-see-classic-clips-from-the-johnny-cash-show-golden-nuggets 
*Johnny Cash the biography by Michael Streissguth, page 168
*http://www.tv.com/shows/the-johnny-cash-show/episodes/Richard27182 (talk) 08:16, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor correction
Talk:Henry T. King

message: This is a mess. AFAIK, Walther von Brauchitsch was only a witness at the Nuremberg Trials of 1945/46, i.e. the "Trial of the Major War Criminals". He was held prisoner until 1948, when he was to be tried before a British court in Germany (in Hamburg, I suppose). That's where von Brauchitsch died before he could be tried. Where does the American Henry T. King come in? Furthermore, I am not aware of Heinz Guderian having been tried. In any case, neither of them were defendants in the High Command Trial of the Subsequent Nuremberg Trials and unless I'm missing something, they were not defendants at the "Trial of the Major War Criminals". Erhard Milch was tried in the Milch Trial, which, just like the Ministries Trial and the Judges' Trial, was part of the Subsequent Nuremberg Trials. Lupo 15:10, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added a specific reference that clarifies these cases and King's role. As you suggest, and King confirms, Guberian was never tried. King appears to have been mistaken about von Brauchitsch's trial; perhaps I'll write King about that. You are also correct that the article needs to make better distinctions between the different trials. Perhaps I'll get to that another day.Easchiff 11:46, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Brauchitsch, Guderian, Milch