lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Za dom spremni

message: Virovitičan, July 3, 1921. A child at a school event recites a patriotic song:
Ne valja, braćo, zaboravit brata,
A pomoć brza vrijedi poput zlata
Za brata ginuli su uvjek baš Hrvati,
Za rod i dom spremni život dati!
It was local newspaper from Virovitica. This was published on page 2, upper right corner. If you read other stuff on the same page, you can see that there were Serbs present, that Serbian authors were also recited, that they are talking positive about prince Alexander who later become the tyrant and the main cause for Ustashe resistance. (Ustaše means those who stood up, i.e. rebels). Now, if kids were reciting such patriotic songs, and it was normal and common thing, what were adults doing? One can only imagine.
This few verses of the song are about not forgetting your brother (in this context your people, nation), saying that Croats always gave their life for their brothers, and ending in the last verse with readiness to give your life for your people and your homeland.--Zekoslavac (talk) 08:55, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Example in 1921 

message: On Croatian Wikipedia I wrote a passage about "Za dom spremni" in songs after 1990. I kindly ask someone who understands well Croatian and who is fluent in English, to translate that passage. I think those informations throw a different light on the whole story and are also useful for discussion. Here is the link. --Zekoslavac (talk) 23:21, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  ZDS in songs after 1990 - translation needed 

message: Introduction
* was a salute used during World War II by the Ustaše movement - It was a salute, a shout, an ideal, an expression of patriotism, happiness because the Yugoslav (Serbian) occupation ended... It was used by the Ustasha movement but was also used outside of the Ustasha movement, accepted in the masses of people. It was not only used in World War II, but also before World War II, also inside and outside the Ustasha movement. It was used after WW2, mainly in Diaspora. From the very beginning of the war in Croatia in the 90s it was used in military units: in some as official salute, and in some as a frequent exclamation and motif. It appeared in numerous popular songs of that time, some of which are popular even today. After that, it was used during football matches for cheering, for many years, along with some other patriotic chants. To say that the salute was used by Ustasha during the Second World War creates a completely wrong impression because in overall history last 25 years are much more important for its usage than those 4 years of WW2 or a few pre-war years. It is very stupid, and totally inaccurate, to tie something like that to just 4 years of the Second World War, or worse - with the ideology of fascism and Nazism. --Zekoslavac (talk) 02:16, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biased, malicious and incorrect interpretations
Talk:Iowa Public Radio

message: FAQ is a dead link.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.188.158.169 (talk) 16:19, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I linked it to the Wayback Machine. Thanks for reporting it! You can also place "" after a link to track it with a category until it's fixed. —PC-XT+ 04:47, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: FAQ is a dead link
Talk:KDMI

message: KDMDT → KDMI-DT … Rationale: Page was originally at KCWI-DT but I moved it to "KDMDT" by mistake. The article was created at KDMI-DT and moved to KCWI-DT when the FCC changed its call letters, but the call letters were changed back to KDMI-DT before the station signed on.  KCWI-DT does not exist as KCWI-TV (formerly KPWB) has no digital signal. … Please share your opinion at Talk:KDMDT. — Iowahwyman 23:21, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
*Oppose.  Move should be to KDMI which is the call assigned by the FCC.  Vegaswikian 05:42, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: This article has been renamed as the result of a move request. —Mets501 (talk) 21:25, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Talk:Creek whaler

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --– Sadalmelik ☎ 07:57, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Cretoxyrhina

message: With nice free images that can be used here: FunkMonk (talk) 14:28, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Cretoxyrhina feeding on Pteranodon paper 

message: The stress marks in the pronunciation, as originally given, looked wrong to me: /ˌkrˈɪtɔːksiːrhaɪnə/ appears to separate the "Cr-" into its own secondarily-stressed syllable, with primary stress placed on the "-et-" (KR-IT-oxee-ry-nuh). Assuming it's supposed to be KRIH-TOX-ee-ry-nuh, I changed it to /ˌkrɪˈtɔːksiːrhaɪnə/ Lusanaherandraton (talk) 03:38, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds good to me. Macrophyseter | talk 06:11, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 

message: It would seem that the study supposedly published in 2013 titled Vertebral morphology, dentition, age, growth, and ecology of the large lamniform shark Cardabiodon ricki, was published in 2015 after the Acta Palaeontologica Polonica link, can anyone explains me this ?Amirani1746 (talk) 09:05, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Newbrey ''et al.'' 2013 ?
Talk:Daggernose shark

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:50, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 

message: The daggernose has been recorded at over 5 feet in length yet the maximum recorded weight is 29 lbs? Surely this weight is a typo.64.203.205.138 (talk) 22:30, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Weight is much more difficult to measure than length, which is why these discrepancies happen in the data records. The largest individuals known were simply never weighed. -- Yzx (talk) 23:18, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Length/weight
Talk:Signboard

message: Where is the picture for the above? Mar de Sin Talk to me! 21:50, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Kannada/Tamil/English hotel sign

message: Bibliography:
*Larwood, Jacob and John Camden Hotten. English Inn Signs. Being a revised and modernised version of History of Signboards by Jacob Larwood and John Camden Hotten. With a chapter on the modern inn sign by Gerald Millar. Chatto & Windus; 1951 ISBN 070110886X (The authors start with a general history of signboards, from the Egyptians and Romans onwards, then discuss various common inn-sign subjects.)
Category:Public houses in the United Kingdom
I removed that.. --W!B: 20:25, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  English Inn Signs
Talk:KTIV

message: Hello, Please do not add unreferenced names as entries to a list of former employees in articles. Including this type of material in articles does not abide by current consensus and its inclusion is strongly discouraged in our policies and guidelines. The rationales are as follows:
#WP:NOT tells us, Wikipedia is "not an indiscriminate collection of information."  As that section describes, just because something is true, doesn't necessarily mean the info belongs in Wikipedia.  
#As per WP:V, we cannot include information in Wikipedia that is not verifiable and sourced. 
# WP:NLIST tells us that lists included within articles (including people's names) are subject to the same need for references as any other information in the article. 
#Per WP:BLP, we have to be especially careful about including un-sourced info about living persons.
If you look at articles about companies in general, you will not find mention of previous employees, except in those cases where the employee was particularly notable.  Even then, the information is not presented just as a list of names, but is incorporated into the text itself (for example, when a company's article talks about the policies a previous CEO had, or when they mention the discovery/invention of a former engineer/researcher). If a preexisting article is already in the encyclopedia for the person you want to add to a list, it's generally regarded as sufficient to support their inclusion in list material in another article. 70.48.216.22 (talk) 00:35, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding unreferenced entries of former employees to lists containing BLP material 
Talk:KWQC-TV

message: You say KWQC transmits from Orion, while the FCC Query still has it at Bettendorf. Who's right? And can anyone at KWQC confirm? Mvcg66b3r (talk) 13:57, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transmitter location
Talk:KWWF

message: At the end of analog broadcasting on June 12, 2009, KWWF continued to provide a signal to cable systems. This satellite feed ended about a week later and the station is currently silent.
Uh, no it didn't. I'm watching KWWF's satellite feed right now on Sunday afternoon, Jan 3rd 2010 on Anik F3 (119 deg W) 3920 MHz, Symbol Rate 18447, FEC 3/4, VPID 201, APID 202 - just like LyngSat says it is http://www.lyngsat.com/119west.html Just saw the KWWF ID at the top of the hour.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.26.72.233 (talk) 22:14, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  KWWF is NOT dark on satellite 
Talk:KYOU-TV

message: "KYOU" is not redirecting here. Instead, that redirects to the article on  "Kyo Sohma"."
24.32.122.214 (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 03:53, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think KYOU-TV is actually still operated by Raycom Media, even though the company sold KTVO years ago.  KYOU is not on Barrington Broadcasting's station list, which includes stations Barrington operates but does not own, such as WWMB and WTVH.  Also, the domain name is owned by Raycom Media; that probably wouldn't happen if it didn't run the station.  (I must also note that Barrington Broadcasting has followed the lead of Nexstar and gone to generically-named websites covering all of its stations in a market — yet KYOU still has its own website.)  While Raycom's station map makes no mention of KYOU, the same can be said for Southeastern Media Holdings stations and KFVE, which are definitely Raycom-operated.  There's also this: Southeastern Media Holdings is now owned by American Spirit Media — the on-paper owner of KYOU.  It's pretty clear based on all that that Raycom still operates KYOU, and that when Barrington bought KTVO, its involvement with KYOU more-or-less ended.  Sadly, sources are hard to come by in this matter… (By the way, Raycom never owned KYOU's license; that has been owned by American Spirit Media (formerly Ottumwa Media Holdings) since 2003, and Waitt Broadcasting before that.)  --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:07, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure about the Raycom, but yeah I'm beginning to strongly doubt Barrington ownership, unless (as I thought it was) American Spirit is a "shell" company/spinoff of some kind. The whole thing is a frustrating clusterf#@* IMHO.(lol) I have repeatedly e-mailed KYOU asking for clarification on ownership, dates of ownership changes, and general station history but met with silence or "we're working on that and hope to get back to you soon". I'll leave it the way you changed until some definitive word can be established. Happy Wikiing!Sector001 (talk) 01:16, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Still a Raycom station, not Barrington 
Talk:Fort Madison, Iowa

message: There are 3 public elementary, 1 middle school, and 1 high school in the Fort Madison Community School District.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.43.203.225 (talk) 15:17, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Should the information on the old fort and its history be made into its own article? BillHart93 (talk) 18:16, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old Fort Madison 

message: I have one source onsite that claims Fort Madison was still a military post in 1832. (Iowa As It Is in 1856 • Chapter 1 — BITLY/PARIOW1). It seems unlikely, but the book was written in 1855 by a man intimately familiar with Iowa. 24.136.6.157 (talk) 10:41, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: 1832 still a fort??
Talk:Peter Heier

message: I looked over the admittedly comparatively few sources I had available on the subject of Christianity in China yesterday, as well as a few sources on exorcism, and find that the subject is apparently not discussed in regards to any other subject. On that basis, I propose that the extant material be merged into the List of exorcists, which seems to me to be the most directly relevant target page. John Carter (talk) 17:23, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The claim of notability here seems to be serving as an exorcist. I don't think this meets WP:Notability (people) since the List of exorcists article states that prior to the Second Vatican Council, every priest would have received this title, so it can't be claimed as a "significant award or honor". I don't think Dwain's claims of an "important event" "which helped to spread a story of exorcism" is substantiated by the citations: The first being a footnote list; the second being a Vatican "Imprimatur" publication which fails the independence requirement. There is no claim that any notable publication discussed this person, let alone this event.Dkriegls (talk) 17:06, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Every priest did not perform exorcisms. The unsourced statement from a list page that you are using as evidence for non-notability does not support your argument, especially since you are even suggesting removing the list page all together. Dwain (talk) 21:26, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: That is the only criterion provided for being an exorcist. I am taking the debate to the list page because any conclusion on the subject there would also apply here. If you know of another criterion for determining exorcists, I suggest you bring it up there.Dkriegls (talk) 21:42, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

text: The list page now has a more clear criterion for inclusion, but I don't think this article meets WP:Notability (people). The two issues at hand are: First, does being an exorcist meet WP:Notability (people); Second do the references used go beyond trivial coverage. Dkriegls (talk) 23:19, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Menachem Mendel Schneersohn

message: The current short description, Third Chabad Rebbe, appears to violate WP:Short_description as it is not readily comprehensible to someone who doesnt know what Chabad is (in other words 99% of humanity). Horse Eye Jack (talk) 22:51, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Since you seem to have this same issue on all Chabad rebbes pages, may I propose you make a centralized post at WT:JUDAISM. Debresser (talk) 23:06, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Short description  

message: The article gives the birthplace as "Liozna, Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth", but according to the map in First Partition of Poland, Liozna was part of the Russian Empire since 1772. -- 194.39.218.10 (talk) 14:13, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: , thanks. Debresser (talk) 18:41, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Liozna was Russian by 1789
Talk:Finetooth shark

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:59, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Stagehand

message: I think that Theatrical Technician should be merged into Stagehand because they are the same thing.Lekogm 22:01, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging Theatrical Technician with Stagehand

message: Reading through the Challenges section of this article, it struck me that it was seeming just a long litany of exaggerated comments about how hard it is to be a stagehand. I'm not entirely sure this section is true to encyclopedic principles. but regardless, things like "tens of thousands of tons of gear [to be constructed in a single day]" and "climbing structures that are tens of stories high" aren't rooted so much in fact as fantasy, especially given that the entire section doesn't cite a single source. Jpouliot (talk) 16:38, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revamping the Challenges Section 

message: I think an important part of consolidating and making practical a major part of this article would be to describe the Theatrical vs Arena situation, and also to include tasks and roles of departments. Also using some sort of disambiguation regarding the rigging duties and roles vs audio, etc. Schilsound (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 23:36, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Departments & Venue roles and specialization

message: Should this article still have the expansion tag? I'm not sure that it should.
Also, I added an unclear tag to it, since I think it could use some help to the effect of the specific difference, especially in reference to previous discussion, between theatrical technician and stage hand. Pip (talk) 12:59, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion? (Also - unclear)

message: Event technician seems to be a subset of Stagehand, but given that it is referenced (and this one isn't), consolidation will help the content of both of these short articles. Klbrain (talk) 07:45, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal
Talk:Washington Park (Dubuque, Iowa)

message: It has been proposed below that Washington Park be renamed and moved to Washington Park (baseball) so that Washington Park (disambiguation) can be moved in its place.  Please discuss at Talk:Washington Park.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD)  15:19, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move
Talk:Willamette Shore Trolley

message: I mistakenly started a new version of this article at Willamette Shore Railway. I have since redirected, but it's possible one of the sources I found would be useful. The stub I started is here: Special:Permalink/646072623 -Pete (talk) 19:04, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  possibly useful? 

message: I am reassessing this article as B Class, which seems uncontroversial. (It was listed as "Start" by WikiProject Trains, and "C" by WikiProject Oregon.) But it looks to me like a good candidate to be proposed for WP:GA. Any thoughts? -Pete (talk) 21:11, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good article nomination? 

message: I created a basic map of the right-of-way, from OpenStreetMap. I don't think it's worthy of inclusion without marking the route more clearly; but thought I'd stash it here in case somebody wants to take that on. -Pete (talk) 19:35, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, Pete. Is there an easy way for uploading maps like this via OSM? I've always thought more articles would benefit from having maps. I wish there were a streamlined process to add OSM maps to Wikimedia projects... ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:47, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  There might be, but I'm not aware of it. I'd ask around at WP:WikiProject Maps. We got excellent help a long time ago from , who made gorgeous maps on request for the Columbia River article. Perhaps there is, or could be, some convenient software to extract OSM maps? In this case, I just took a screen shot. -Pete (talk) 17:47, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Basic map
Talk:Pentacrest

message: Once in the text there is the spelling "Old Capital" instead of "Old Capitol". First, i thought it is a misspelling. But in the Infobox, there are some filenames with the same spelling. Is it just old-fashioned and modern spelling? --Himbeerbläuling (talk) 19:50, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Different spellings
Talk:Otley, Iowa

message: Please review the following to get a better idea of what you should add to this article:
# Follow the Wikipedia USCITY guideline for layout and content.
# Look at these great articles for ideas: Lock Haven, Pennsylvania / Stephens City, Virginia / Kent, Ohio / Tulsa, Oklahoma / Grand Forks, North Dakota.
# Please ensure a person meets Wikipedia Notability requirements before adding to the "Notable People" section (if there is one).
Please review the following before editing:
# Document your source by citing a reference to prove your text is verifiable.
# Add only information that has a neutral point of view instead of sounding like an advertisement.
# Read the "Editing, Creating, and Maintaining Articles" chapter from the book Wikipedia : The Missing Manual, .—RifeIdeas Talk  11:08, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important Notes Before Editing This Article