lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:St Bede's School, Hailsham

message: Since the article was merged with the Prep School one, perhaps it should be refocused and named 'St. Bede's School' for BOTH schools.
We can't have an article for both schools that's heavily based on the senior school - especially since the prep is more important in terms of history - it's around 100 years older than the senior, and had many more notable alumni.
On top of that, having prep school alumni listed as going to 'St Bede's School, Hailsham' is confusing - it implies people like Eddie Izzard went to the senior - even though they didn't!
90.198.231.236 (talk) 21:46, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: There's no reason why there shouldn't be separate articles for the senior school and the prep school so long as suitable sources can be found to support two independent articles. I can't find any evidence of an earlier article for the prep school. There only seems to have been a redirect page. Dahliarose (talk) 01:05, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename / Refocused article
Talk:Epothilone

message: Which are naturally found - is it all of A - F ? Are all the synthetic ones referred to as analogs ? - Rod57 (talk) 11:55, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, A to F are natural compounds ("As of September 2008, epothilones A to F have been identified and characterised."). --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 19:52, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which are naturally found - is it all of A - F 

message: What is the definition of an epothilone ? Is it the 16-member macrolide ring with a thiazole/olefin side-chain , or something more specific (just the 6 configurations A-F (of the 8 possible combinations of 2 thiazole side chains with 4 ring structures)) ? - Rod57 (talk) 12:12, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think there is a convention about what an epothilone and what an epothilone analogue is. There aren't even any substances on the market yet. (For example, no one refers to azithromycin as a "macrolide analog" although it doesn't really meet the original definition of "macrolide" and isn't found in nature.) --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 19:52, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Definition
Talk:Frasier season 1

message: Should we merge this with a similar article on the same episode?
Asuyuka (talk) 23:48, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Mergers

message: I think the episodes I have prosposed should be merged as all lack independent reliable third person sources to justify solo articles. Dwanyewest (talk) 00:09, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, maybe except for the first episode. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 01:26, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: I believe the remainder of episodes should be merged. Dwanyewest (talk) 17:38, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: "The Good Son" episode having won 3 major awards i find grounds for NOT merging it. It would be merged into nothingness. delirious & lost ☯ ~hugs~ 14:47, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur that this episode must retain its own article.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR)  19:46, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge remainder 

message: 99.244.151.88, would you please use this talk page to discuss why you think adding trivial notes about a particular actor's sexuality is a good idea? -- SchrutedIt08 (talk) 06:48, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Actor's sexuality
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College baseball

message: For those in this WikiProject interested: Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 April 11#College baseball class-/position-specific award navboxes. Thank you. SportsGuy789 (talk) 04:00, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mass-TfD college baseball navboxes nomination 

message: I noticed that several editors editing SEC teams game logs list their own ranking in the rank column and if the opponent is ranked they put "at No. 3 Florida".  My understanding is that that column was for the opponent's rank and it is enough to have the subject's ranking in the info box at the top of the page.  Can you clarify this, because I have been editing Kentucky's page for the last several years and one of us has been doing it wrong.  Thank you. rogerd (talk) 04:59, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Rogerd the style you describe the other editor doing it (team's own ranking in the rank column and opponent's ranking as "at No. 3 Florida") is the correct way - this is also done on college football and college basketball pages, where the schedule is done with a template and the opponent's rank and team's own rank have different parameters ( and ). PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 03:48, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  rank column in the game log table 

message: You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:1977 Cal State Los Angeles Golden Eagles baseball team § Let’s get the record straight…. -- Marchjuly (talk) 16:04, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Would someone from this WikiProject please take a look at this post and see if they can help the OP out? The OP posted for help on my user talk page, and I advised them to use the article's talk page to try and seek assistance. -- Marchjuly (talk) 16:06, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion at [[:Talk:1977 Cal State Los Angeles Golden Eagles baseball team#Let’s get the record straight….|Talk:1977 Cal State Los Angeles Golden Eagles baseball team §&nbsp;Let’s get the record straight….]]

message: Hello,
I created the page for this year's Auburn team several months ago but it got moved to draftspace and has been sitting there for 7+ weeks. The page is consistent with the other college baseball pages, at least in the SEC. The box at the top of the page says that I should ask here for help since its been taking so long. If anyone can help, it would be much appreciated. SouthernDude297 (talk) 02:24, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  About [[Draft:2024 Auburn Tigers baseball team]]
Talk:Beverley Road

message: The article is missing many historical details on Beverley Road.
 http://news.bbc.co.uk/local/humberside/hi/people_and_places/history/newsid_9391000/9391548.stm
 https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1001520
 https://historicengland.org.uk/services-skills/education/educational-images/swimming-baths-beverley-road-8684
 https://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/news/history/482-hull-buildings-monuments-protected-1402999
 https://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/news/hull-east-yorkshire-news/secret-parts-beverley-road-you-1126224
 https://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/whats-on/whats-on-news/19-hidden-historical-gems-beverley-82173
 http://news.bbc.co.uk/local/humberside/hi/people_and_places/history/newsid_9391000/9391548.stm
WW2 Bombed out National Picture theatre
 http://cinematreasures.org/theaters/40893
 http://aircrashsites.co.uk/air-raids-bomb-sites/the-national-picture-theatre-hull-2/
Welly Club History
 https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/the-welly-goes-back-to-rock-roots-to-celebrate-100th-year-1-5974450
Pearson Park History
 https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1001520
 http://www.hullwebs.co.uk/content/k-victorian/leisure/parks-and-gardens/pearson-park.htm
Existing Wikipedia resources
 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beverley_Road_railway_station
 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Endeavour_Learning_and_Skills_Centre
 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Closed_cinemas_in_Kingston_upon_Hull#National_Picture_Theatre
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trams_in_Kingston_upon_Hull
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pearson_Park
77.86.117.208 (talk) 08:18, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing lots of details
Talk:G.R.O.S.S

message: I think this page could use a lot of work, and so I am going to begin cleaning it up some. Fieryrogue 22:33, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think this meets Wikipedia:Notability (fiction). It belongs on Wikia:Calvin and Hobbes. Feezo (Talk) 17:39, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, the more I thought about it, the more I was thinking the same thing. Fieryrogue 15:25, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've redirected it to Calvin and Hobbes. If someone wants to recover it to use somewhere else, check the page history. Feezo (Talk) 18:33, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Dundalk Institute of Technology

message: That first reference is a 404. Looks like it ought to be removed  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.7.165.130 (talk) 13:31, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken Link 
Talk:List of Major League Baseball career doubles leaders

message: This article is basically the same as List of Major League Baseball all-time leaders in doubles and should be merged. Fbdave 22:37, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: tag rmv – redirect is used for appropriate reasons. MusiCitizen 13:00, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger

message: Since the article states that active players are in bold face, I removed the bold face on Tris Speaker. Fbdave (talk) 02:51, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: '''Bold facing''' the leader

message: Does anyone object if I indicate which players are in the Hall of Fame, like I did here?  Coemgenus 19:35, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Why use a symbol and a color?  Use one or the other; using both is overkill and makes the list too busy. Dacunni1 (talk) 16:30, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I thought so, too, but when I got List of Major League Baseball players with 100 triples featured, they said it was required, so as to allow color-blind people to see the list.  I suppose just symbols could work, but the color is easier for the non-color-blind to pick out at a glance.  Coemgenus 17:25, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hall of Fame 
Talk:Victoria, Newfoundland and Labrador

message: should it be mentioned that victoria is sometimes called the village. just asking cuz i live here and thats what we call it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.162.20.136 (talk) 17:40, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, by typing in 'the village' in the wiki search you'll get the option to view this page. Seems okay to me, as long as we don't also mention 'Savage Holler'! --Bentonia School (talk) 06:20, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Village
Talk:Baseball Card Adventures

message: Can some people help me write this article? - E2MB the museblogger 22:47, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Still no referencing :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 10:22, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Just some notes on what needs clean up on page:
*Typo correction
*General Copy Editing
*Redirect cleanup --- most of the "main article" links link to the same article
*Better resolution picture if possible 
Best, Upjav (talk) 03:11, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup on Baseball Card Adventures
Talk:Steinmetz College Prep

message: * Steinmetz (English gothic)
* Lane Tech (tudor/gothic)
* Schurz (prarie style)
* Thorp (Grek revival)Wrightwriter (talk) 05:34, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Schools of Chicago with Architectural Importance 

message: We are trying to find out the location of the reunion that is being held this weekend.  My step father has forgotten to bring the location details in town with him.  Any help is appreciated.  
barbara5600@comcast.net  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.102.224.107 (talk) 18:39, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  High School Reunion this Weekend
Talk:Chicago Vocational Career Academy

message: I have been trying my best to slug it through the information that is available on this school.  This is a school with an incredible history, and a few notable alumni.  I hope that some editor with knowledge of this school, and knows where to find better resources, can help out.  I think this school has an important story to tell. LonelyBeacon (talk) 04:44, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You've done some nice work so far. If you live in Chicago, you can access the Chicago Tribune archives through the Chicago Public Library's website. . I might pitch in on this article sometie soon. Zagalejo^^^ 04:57, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks.  I have no connection to the school, and only knew that it was "Dick Butkus' school".  I'm not even sure why I stopped here and started doing any work.  I just found the history of the school to be more intriguing than I thought. LonelyBeacon (talk) 12:37, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: I hope ...
Talk:Region Skåne

message: The region Skåne was not replacing the counties. You cannot compare apples with pears. --Muniswede 22:54, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

message: There has been a controversy between the user John Anderson and  other users about endonyms and exonyms regarding the Swedish traditional province Scania and its modern administrative and municipal counterparts. Perhaps the best thing for this entity (Region Skåne) is just to use this name even in English. The region is legally a landsting which is type of secondary municipality according to the Swedish Local Government Act. The main responsibilities of the landsting are public health care, public transport, some education and culture within its area (which alwas correpsonds with a län). The difference  is that the län are districts within the central government, but the landsting are local government units. In the case of Region Skåne and Västra Götalandsregionen they have got some more power delegated from the central government. But they are in no way "states" and Sweden is still a unitary state and not a federation. Region Skåne uses the same name in its English-language information. Västra Götalndsregionen uses the "translation" Region Västra Götaland. Perhaps we shlould do the same thing. --Muniswede (talk) 23:09, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I really think the denomination "Scania Regional Council" was "invented" on the Wikipedia. Most of the 800 hits refers to wiki pages. "Skåne Regional Council" givs us ten times as many hits and "Region Skåne" (if we choose English language) givs us 16000 hits. Should we move it?  --Muniswede (talk) 12:15, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, John Anderson is one among several confirmed sock puppets on svwp and IMHO we shouldn't take too much into account what he says. GameOn (talk) 12:00, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  No English name at all 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Page moved. (closed by non-admin page mover)  Jerium (talk) 19:33, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Scania Regional Council →  – The move discussion above is dated and confused. According to their own webpage, the preferred term in English is "Region Skåne". Same goes for other regions like Västra Götaland. SALAR, the collaborative organization representing all Swedish municipalities and regions, uses the same term.
The term "regional council" is something that seems to have been simply made up by Wikipedians. No sources appear to have ever been provided to back up the term "regional council". Peter Isotalo 17:57, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

text: Support per nomination AlexandraAVX (talk) 07:31, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

text: Suppor per the evidence. Draken Bowser (talk) 16:13, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 11 February 2024
Talk:Strain 121

message: Are there any projects going on to sequence its genome? 80.108.103.172 (talk) 16:59, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genome Sequencing 

message: Strain 121 is an archaeon, says this article. But following the article on archaea: "In the past they were viewed as an unusual group of bacteria and named archaebacteria but (...) they are now classified as a separate domain in the three-domain system." So strain 121 is not a bacterium. And so... why does this article say that 130°C is bacteriostatic to them? Shouldn't it say archaeostatic, or something like that? Or just say that it prevents them from reproducing? Think of an article on amoeba talking about some condition being "bacteriostatic" for them. David Olivier (talk) 10:55, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've replaced "bacteriostatic" by "biostatic". I've removed the wikilink, because biostatic unfortunately redirects back to bacteriostatic. The wikilink was actually already useless, because the bacteriostatic article is about antibiotic substances, not about the term in general (in this case, specifically the effect of heat), and because the meaning of the term is already explained in the text. David Olivier (talk) 10:19, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bacteriostatic? 

message: Hey guys, I'm looking to do some edits on this article and was wondering if you can give me suggestions for my bibliography. I am trying to focus on the metabolism and environmental contributions of this organism. Hopefully I can add some stuff about its characteristics and genome structure as well. 
Kashefi, Kazem; Lovley, Derek R. (2003-08-15). "Extending the Upper Temperature Limit for Life". Science. 301 (5635): 934–934. doi:10.1126/science.1086823. ISSN 0036-8075.
Eisele, T; Gabby, K (March 4, 2014). "Review of Reductive Leaching of Iron by Anaerobic Bacteria". Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review. Taylor and Francis Group. 35 (2): 75–105. doi:10.1080/08827508.2012.703627. eISSN 1547-7401. ISSN 0882-7508 – via Web of Science.
Schoffman, Hanan; Lis, Hagar; Shaked, Yeala; Keren, Nir (August 18, 2016). "Iron–Nutrient Interactions within Phytoplankton". Frontiers in Plant Science. 7 (1223). doi:10.3389/fpls.2016.01223. PMC 4989028. PMID 27588022 – via NCBI.
--Inquiringmindhive (talk) 16:44, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography for possible future edits
Talk:Larry Miller (sports executive)

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.si.com/nba/2021/10/13/jordan-brand-chairman-larry-miller-shares-secret-daily-cover. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  —Bagumba (talk) 08:18, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: After seeing an addition and then a revert and then a return to the original, I must ask the question: Is Larry Miller a convicted murder? We must lean heavily on WP:BLP especially for circumstances like this. Was he officially convicted as a juvenile for murder?  {Static} 14:14, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It's true, but here's a question - Who the Hell gets corporate jobs after serving 14 years for killing a dude on the street in cold blood?  2601:5C6:8180:BAD0:EC1E:6741:325B:4688 (talk) 17:39, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Convicted murderer" 

message: Some suggestions, don't be so shy to add these, and probably much more:
* Category:20th-century American criminals
* Category:American male criminals
* Category:Criminals from Pennsylvania
213.197.72.98 (talk) 19:33, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  More categories
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Opera/Archive 30

message: I have just found that Cielomobile put this note on the Project page:
*Note: this is currently being discussed on the talk page, see Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Opera#Infobox:_To_remove_or_not_to.._better_do_it_once_and_for_all.
I have removed it and ask him never to do this again. The Infobox policy was discussed here and the wording was agreed by the Project. It is not for one editor to announce the policy is under review especially when he/she is the only person challenging it. This is unacceptable behaviour. -- Kleinzach 23:52, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I won't put it up there again unless someone else agrees, but the way I see it, it's a bit like a  note put on an article. It does not take consensus to note that the POV of an article is being disputed. If one or two edits think that there is POV, then a notice is placed on the article. The fact is, I'm not the only editor who is disputing this (I noticed that you are among only two edits who are adamant about the use of absolutely no infoboxes; other seem to be open to at least the possibility). If the final outcome of the discussion is that we are not to use infoboxes, then there should be no such note, but until then, editors should know that a discussion is currently taking place. Consensus can change, and past decisions is not set in stone. This is an official Wikipedia policy, Kleinzach, and unless you are going to ignore it, it should be respected. -- Cielomobile talk / contribs 00:54, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The question of infoboxes has been discusssed repeatedly over several months. Each time it is re-affirmed that we are not going to use them, then a couple of weeks later (or less) someone comes along and announces, as you have done, that there is a debate in progress. Of course, consensus can change and it should change with changed circumstances, however if we have to engage in these sterile arguments ad nauseam it disrupts contributing to the encyclopedia. -- Kleinzach 01:10, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I've posted at the village pump to get more people into the discussion. Perhaps consensus won't change, but I'd like to give it a chance. -- Cielomobile talk / contribs 06:31, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Cielomobile's wording should be restored to the project page. It has been clear for some time that there is no consensus on this issue. Wikipedia works by consensus-building, not affirmation by self-appointed cabals. Ongoing and wider discussion is necessary. Andy Mabbett 07:45, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "Consensus-building"? That's rich coming from you, Mabbett, with your persistent attempts to bulldoze everybody into accepting "microformats". --Folantin 10:16, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cielomobile's note on the Project page