lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Chicken curry

message: 'Curry' is not an ingredient. The distinction between 'chicken curry' and 'curry chicken' is regional variation; it has nothing to do with order of preparation. I'm fixing these issues, but also making a note here in case somebody comes along and unfixes them again.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by A.Nath (talk • contribs) 04:05, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: This article is gibberish

message: I'm not sure thast the information on Country Captain being served by Mrs. W.L. Bullard in 1940 is correct.  FDR announced for Gov. of NY in her parlor in 1928.  I think she served it to him around that time and subsequently to Gen. Patton.  What was the source for the 1940 date? History buff cook (talk) 01:51, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article has very little information on chicken curry and plenty on Country Captain, more, in fact than is in the article of that name.  Shouldn't the Country Captain info be moved there and be referenced here?
I'd also like to see the actual chicken curry info expanded, perhaps to talk about various styles of the dish in different parts of the world, e.g., made with butter/ghee, or coconut milk, or some other fat; served with rice, flatbread, veggies etc.  Some kind of better idea of what chicken curry consists of on the Indian subcontinent, Asia, Caribbean, UK, US and so on.  It doesn't have to duplicate all the info in the Curry article, but this is preetty skimpy.  Zlama (talk) 06:32, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pretty skimpy on actual "chicken curry" info 

message: Explain how did the chicken curry Looks 181.41.106.58 (talk) 00:33, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  How did the chicken curry looks
Talk:Gillet

message: This article is pretty much rubbish, and 3.1 seconds is nowhere close to the record for acceleration. Chaparral2J (talk) 03:44, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unnamed section 

message: Gillet SHOULD be a DP:
There was a motorcycle manufacturer of the same name before WWII. 159.134.94.21 11:46, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gillet x2 

message: The Gillet Vertigo is a vehicle available in the video game, "Gran Turismo 3: A-spec". Would this be relevant information for the article? P.S. I'm getting a picture of the Vertigo 224JEFF6    SAY SOMETHIN' KID! 20:46, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gillet in GT3 game 
Talk:Linda Manzer

message: Sometime in the last few days the manzer.com website disappeared.  Given that she was born in '52, does anyone know if Linda's in the process of retiring?--Deke42 (talk) 19:34, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Sometimes websites go down. As of right now, it is open in my browser with a message reading "Summer 2015 Linda is now taking orders for custom guitars!  PaulCHebert (talk) 22:11, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:   Interesting, thanks!  I left a message on her Facebook page but got no reply.  It might even have been that that got it opened again, and even if it wasn't I can boast that it was!--Deke42 (talk) 11:25, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Dead website

message: The second paragraph in the "Career" section seems to imply that she invented the baritone guitar; she did not.  Baritones existed at least as far back as 1905 in Germany, and the Japanese Niibori Guitar Ensemble has included baritone classical guitars since 1957.
I didn't take the statement out, but I flagged it for a citation -- I couldn't find one.
74.95.43.253 (talk) 22:32, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Baritone guitar
Talk:Gift shop

message: Formal request has been received to merge: Museum shop into Gift shop; dated: February 2023. Proposer's Rationale: A museum shop is just a type of gift shop, and not independently notable. It ahould be fine as a section of gift shop. Sir Magnus has spoken! (So can you!). Discuss here. GenQuest "scribble" 23:43, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal
Talk:Gibson Dunn

message: Restructured lead section to clarify the mentioned vault.com ranking as branche-internal survey (the source is under discussion at WP:RSN), and to address WP:NPOV and WP:WEIGHT issues. On a sidenote, several of the "notable xyz" entries are unsourced. The article would be a lot better, if those sections would focus on some of the well-sourced, more notable entries. GermanJoe (talk) 21:58, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed the unsouced entries. There are still more than enough examples in the current version to provide a succinct overview</u> of the firm's notable activities. GermanJoe (talk) 22:49, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

text: Removed the Vault source for good. It is promotional garbage based on a trivial branche-internal popularity poll. Of course such a source will be popular with COI editors, who are only here to pad their company's resume and prestige. But it includes no credible and relevant information to enhance an encyclopedic presentation of this topic. Please feel free to add reviews and in-depth analysis from uninvolved industry experts, who provide an unbiased critical and professional view to describe the company. GermanJoe (talk) 19:35, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead
Talk:Gibbs & Cox

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 19:20, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 
Talk:GI Partners

message: User Spudleyspuds added "GI Partners was investigated in late 2006 for laundering money to Arab arms dealers. Details have so far yet to be released." which I undid. I do not know anything about this or whether it is true but it was at least not written in an encylopedic style. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by JRDarby (talk • contribs) 05:59, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, sorry about not signing. JRDarby 20:04, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scandal
Talk:Charles Vaughan

message: I have placed merger tags on a number of character articles. Rather than repeat the reasoning on each talk page I have set out the full argument here. Please feel free to leave comments either on this talk page or at the WikiProject. I want to try and start a debate about the whole way in which Emmerdale information is provided on Wikipedia--Amxitsa 21:10, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed Merger
Talk:Ghirardelli Chocolate Company

message: This page says Lick was "Ghirardelli's nephew," but https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domingo_Ghirardelli says Lick was Ghirardelli's "former neighbor." Can someone knowledgeable on the subject edit whichever page is wrong? Thanks! Agidor Rodiga (talk) 05:57, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: James Lick: neighbor or nephew?

message: Okay, you don't need a citation for every single fact on every line. A single citation for the history works and that's there already. MultK (talk) 22:55, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations

message: I would like to see any blind taste testing results for this and other chocolatiers. It would be interesting to see how Ghirardelli stacks up against Lindt, Godiva, etc.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 06:04, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Blind taste testing

message: — Assignment last updated by TotalSolarEclipse (talk) 16:55, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: NAS 348 Global Climate Change
Talk:Ghetto Gourmet

message: The subject is notable by the references cited. However, the article needs cleanup, and is partially written in an advertising tone. 
I am removing the "importance" tag. Sorted as part of the Notability wikiproject. --B. Wolterding 20:36, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  notability established 
Talk:Gestetner

message: Under the History section is the following paragraph:
In 1996 the international Gestetner Company was acquired by the Ricoh company of Japan. The company was renamed NRG Group PLC, and markets and services Ricoh products under its three main brand names, primarily in Europe, South Africa and the Middle East, but also through dealers throughout the world. The brand has been owned by Ricoh since 1995. In Europe, Gestetner Group became NRG Group which, as of 1 April 2007, became Ricoh Europe.
The first sentence says Gestetner was acquired by Ricoh in 1996. In the third sentence, it states 1995.
Which is correct? Sjones5922 (talk) 20:37, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems to be 1995. Cf.  "1995 — Overname van de NRG Group PLC (Nashuatec, Rex-Rotary, Gestetner, voorheen Gestetner Holdings PLC) in het Verenigd Koninkrijk" Onze geschiedenis | Ricoh België, i.e.: "1995 – [Ricoh] acquiring NRG Group PLC (…) in UK." (Our history | Ricoh Belgium) -- Bartvs (talk) 22:18, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflicting Dates 

message: Is there any evidence to support the claim that NRG comes from  Nashuatec + Rex Rotary + Gestetner ? Why no mention of Lanier? Geofpick (talk) 11:16, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  NRG etymology 

message: There's nothing materially wrong with the article at present, but it doesn't really convey the popularity of Gestetner duplicators in the UK in the 50s and 60s. They seemed to be everywhere - almost every school office had at least one, for example, and they were used for everything from preparing teaching materials to printing the school magazine. Ef80 (talk) 17:20, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  British ubiquity
Talk:German Steel Trust

message: Hello,
a cat is an animal, German Steel Trust is an enterprise, well donne, all my greetings !
wikipedia is a propaganda network for wealthy business people ? thats it ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Misterdru (talk • contribs) 11:46, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  WIKIPEDIA "encyclopedia" ? or dictionnary ?
Talk:German Shanghai Metro Group

message: The information is not correct! 
The German Shanghai Metro Group was a consortium formed by AEG (today Bombardier)(leader) and Siemens to deliver the Metro Shanghai Line 1 and Line 2. The consortium was found in 1988 and has been terminated meanwhile, because all obligation of the contracts have been completed. The first members of the consortium were AEG (leader, Siemens, DUEWAG and Waggon Union. The 2 later companies merged later into ADtranz and Siemens. Shanghai Metro Corporation (SMC) was never part of this consortium! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.193.213.33 (talk) 08:12, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: December 2007
Talk:Genuine Parts Company

message: The office supply portion of the company is named after Samuel P. Richards, a merchant during the Civil War in Atlanta and the company dates from around that time.--Jrm2007 (talk) 15:34, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  S. P. Richards 

message: Didn’t GPC spin off SPR as an independent entity 07/01/2020? 2601:CA:C200:4D40:0:0:0:2D88 (talk) 10:34, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  S.P. Richards 

message: I believe Motion Industries is now called Motion; not comfortable editing something that is a hyperlink.
And then what do you do with (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motion_Industries), again, not comfortable with this. Mtanquary (talk) 18:52, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Motion Industries -> Motion
Talk:Volunteer Army (British)

message: As the militia were never part of the Territorial Army, I have deleted the reference in the last section.
--Train guard 14:32, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion 

message: Shouldn't this article be titled Volunteer Force (United Kingdom) rather than Volunteer Army. It seems to have been the term more widely used in contemporary sources (2,616 hits between 1859 and 1908 in The Times Digital Archive, as opposed to 316 for "volunteer army"), and in the reference quoted. 
In 1862 a royal commission was appointed to inquire into the condition of the volunteer force in Great Britain and into the probability of its continuance at its existing strength, this presumably being the preferred official designation. It's also the term used in a number of unit histories on the Ministry of Defence site.
Having said that, 1907 Act that merged them into the TF just calls them "The Volunteers".
Lozleader 10:24, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Having nosed around the stautes (in particular the Volunteer Act 1863), Volunteer Force was definitely the preferred official form. I now  propose moving to Volunteer Force (Great Britain), seeing as units were not formed in Ireland. I'm not sure whether to add the years 1859 - 1908, as there was another volunteer Force during the First World War. Lozleader 14:15, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Title
Talk:Genovese Drug Stores

message: Genovese had many stores beyond Fairfield County, CT.  They operated throughout Connecticut, including in Enfield, Southington, and other locations, and also had a couple stores in Massachuesets, including in Westfield.
Mention might be made the the Genovese crime family, who created and operated these retail locations.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.24.115.35 (talk) 03:19, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:General Motors Canada

message: Fair use rationale completed. Flibirigit 04:02, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Gm logo.gif

message: I raised the article's "class" rating to C today, which might be a bit generous but it's not far off.  PKT(alk) 14:22, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: No mention of New Zealand DC class locomotive and perhaps others. Peter Horn User talk 16:05, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  No mention of locomotives
Talk:General Computer

message: This page should be merged with General Computer Corp.. (199.88.143.1 (talk) 17:00, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, they are both the exact same company, there should be no reason why there's two pages. --Jupiter-4 (talk) 00:10, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Wikipedia talk:Notability (journalists)

message: Before more people come to complain that I am doing this for Timothy Noah, let me clarify something. This is not a special exception fot Noah. I am using him mainly as an example. I really don't care much about Noah. I wouldn't have been angry if his article was deleted, just as I am not angry that it was kept. I did vote "weak keep" in his AfD, because I believe he is notable. However, from everything I have seen so far, he does not meet the criteria at WP:BIO. I voted to keep based on WP:IAR. However, IAR shouldn't have to be the reasoning behind keeping articles like Tim Noah's, thus, this proposal. Mr.Z-mantalk¢ 00:20, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

message: Please add subsections to WP:BIO rather than creating a separate guideline for each and every imaginable profession. >Radiant< 12:59, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: On a similar note, the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Notability/overview may just make this (and many other proposals) moot. Mr.Z-mantalk¢ 00:53, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Objections to this as a guideline 

message: I the draft it says under invalid criteria : Minor staff writer or columnist, does that mean Minor staff writer or minor columnist or are columnist not notable?  AlfPhotoman 21:34, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Huh? 

message: This guideline seems to be me to suffer from a serious vagueness in terms of "senior" and "minor".  On the one hand, "The subject is a senior staff writer, editor, or columnist" leaves completely unexplained what "senior" actually means.  By contrast, "Minor staff writer or minor columnist" is not to included.  The obvious problem is that 90% of columnists and journalists probably fall between these two extremes, which means that the guideline actually fails its purpose of actually guiding editors as they think about inclusion vs. exclusion.   semper fictilis 12:28, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Basically, what it is trying to say, is that senior staff writers, editors, or columnists are notable under this criteria. Everyone else has to meet the general criteria to be considered notable. The minor part is just as a guide to editors planning an article. If the person is a minor writer, they most likely are not notable. The other 90% may be notable, but they are notable for a reason other than that they are journalists. Mr.Z-mantalk¢Review! 16:28, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  senior/junior 

message: We have an AFD that has some issues with finding third-party input.  I remember this proposal from the Timothy Noah AfD, and thought you might be able to help -- I don't know if you still have this on your watchlists or not.  The contested article is here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glenn Rubenstein.  It's a former teenage video game journalist.  I voted delete as I didn't think biographical details could be verified and if this journalist was included I think all would be, but please read the whole discussion and decide for yourselves. --JayHenry 15:58, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Looking for help
Talk:Rembetiko (film)

message: I cringe at the number of Wikipedia articles that start with a statement that "this article needs citations."  However, this article clearly does need citations.  It makes a number of claims about the life of Marika Ninou that should be supported. I don't know anything about Ninou's life aside from what is in the film, and certainly don't expect journalistic accuracy from any filmmaker.  But this is precisely why documentation and citations are needed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.195.20.246 (talk) 23:36, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Talk:Gemmy Industries

message: The companies aboutus page was linked four times as a reference. Is there any point in that? I removed the duplicates for now. --208.40.106.34 (talk) 20:57, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: I focused on the copyvio from here, but it's likely more needs to go. StarM 20:10, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs further stubbing 
Talk:Gee, Your Hair Smells Terrific

message: It is currently available for sale at www.vermontcountrystore.com  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.83.54.27 (talk) 23:41, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of mountain passes in Switzerland

message: Attempting to disambiguate the link to Run, which seemed to refer to no actual place in Switzerland, I unearthed this page , indicating that both of the passes that supposedly connect to Run do in fact connect to Trun, Switzerland. I have changed the information in the table accordingly. If this is incorrect, please correct it. --ShelfSkewed Talk 17:35, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trun
Talk:Garrard Engineering and Manufacturing Company

message: yes, of course the articles about the 301 and 401 should be here, in a 'products' section of the history of the company.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.203.83.22 (talk) 13:21, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commentary 

message: The main concept of the page is acceptable with some great insight into the turntable's history and significance but it needs a major overhaul in terms of it's writing. Sentences such as "must have speed accuracy and wow and flutter specifications as well as low rumble - low frequency vibration" are extremely pooorly worded and at best technically inaccurate whilst at worst extremely misleading. I have cleaned the page as much as my competent English skills and technical knowledge will allow but this needs to be completed by someone with specialist knowledge of these turntables. (Raymond Sanders (talk) 22:54, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Furthering my previous point I suggest the Iconic paragraph be removed, save the first sentence which should added to the main text. Discussing the popularity of Vinyl recordings and analogue reproduction methods seems irrelevant to the subject.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raymond Sanders (talk • contribs) 23:03, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poorly written 

message: This section is nearly identical to the article Garrard Transcription Turntable, either merge or delete it 71.241.153.185 (talk) 15:13, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: The Garrard 301 and 401 Transcription Turntables

message: How was the name pronounced? With a "Hard-G" or a "J" sound? Casey (talk) 16:02, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronounciation
Talk:Gardner Rich & Co

message: This page should just be kept brief. As long as there is some reference to the actual company.
86.146.182.123 10:46, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think so too, but there should be more informations. --Japan01 (talk) 03:57, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Garden Weasel

message: The first episode of the The Larry Sanders Show is entitled "The Garden Weasel" because the show's main character is asked to do some tv ads for the company.  Is that worth a mention. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JordanWB (talk • contribs) 
:Probably not. -Drdisque (talk) 23:08, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cultural References
Talk:Ganz Midwest-CBK

message: What's WP:OR?
webkinz world makes a lot of money for ganz because many kids teens and even adultas ji tthem!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.125.108.172 (talk) 22:49, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well... WP:OR is a short link to a page... and thanks for the comment. Please stay on topic with you question next time! Thanks! ♪♫19maxx♪♫ 02:05, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's WP:OR 

message: Does anybody know where I can contact Ganz? Reliable Forevertalk 19:24, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah! http://www.ganz.com/ganz_contact1.php has there contact information! ♪♫19maxx♪♫ 02:02, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contacting Ganz. 

message: I put up a logo. Note it is a NON-FREE USE FILE don't be downloading, or changing it!!! --♪♫19maxx♪♫ 02:15, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo
Talk:Gannett

message: This piece has some serious flaws in it and misinformation. I was invested in Belo Corporation and Gannett for quite some time. Things that were purported to happen and reported here in a lot of cases never materialized. Gannett, Inc. when I owned them was paying a dividend, they are no longer and have not been profitable for some time.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Madjess (talk • contribs) 19:27, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with your perception that the pending lawsuit information in the article is WP:UNDUE. Novellasyes (talk) 14:51, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :10Best.com. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 27#10Best.com until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  ~~~~User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 15:58, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "10Best.com" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :The Spectrum & Daily News. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 27#The Spectrum & Daily News until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  ~~~~User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 16:00, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The Spectrum & Daily News" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: Fortress Investment group is shown on this article to own New Media Group which owns Gannett. I went to the Fortress Investment group page and theres no mention of either Gannett or New Media Group. 2600:100F:B133:1A11:0:1F:E500:2301 (talk) 17:09, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discrepancy in article 

message: Wicked Local redirects here, but is not mentioned here. Can it be mentioned? Geschichte (talk) 07:10, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wicked Local