lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Rock City (attraction)

message: The current image is a copyrighted one... I have one that can be uploaded to commons. Would that be preferable? (Assuming quality is good enough?) Benders Game 19:22, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's 4 months since you posted, but if you are still paying attention I say go ahead; non-copyrighted is always better.--King Bedford I Seek his grace 11:41, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

text: Never mind, that kind of copyright is OK, as it's free use.  I copyright pictures like that and put them on Wikipedia all the time.--King Bedford I Seek his grace 11:42, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fat Man Squeeze Pic 

message: There are at least six barns in Illinois and seven in Indiana that say "See Rock City", including one just off of U.S. 41 just south of Fort Branch in southern Gibson County, Indiana. Rhatsa26X (talk) 17:40, 26 July 2010 (CDT)
:I was surprised not to see any mention of the birdhouses.  A b'house on a tshirt was mentioned in the pop culture sec, but does no one else remember seeing the Rock City birdhouses, painted just like the barns in red and black, all along the highways of the south?  I don't have facts or figures, but there were many more RC b'houses  than barns, at least one allegedly in Hawaii.  Byers may have painted them as well, but i doubt it.  There were just too many of them for one guy.  
The deal on the barns was interesting.  The legend is that no money changed hands with the barn owners: if u wanted a good free paintjob on your barn, RC would give you one.  Innovative advertising, and some wealth was generated. 
:Ragityman (talk) 11:05, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: See Rock City

message: Why was this article moved from Rock City without discussion? It's been there for years without any objections to it being the primary topic.  This really needed to have been discussed beforehand, and I will propose moving the article back if my objection at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests is declined.- BilCat (talk) 09:45, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undiscussed moves
Talk:Roosevelt Road

message: In the article's lead, is this statement: "In 1928 the new U.S. Route 330 (US 330), a different alignment of US 30, went down Roosevelt Road to Geneva, in 1942 it was redesignated as US 30 Alternate." Which US 30 Alternate is it talking about? I looked at List of bannered U.S. Routes#US 30 and Bannered routes of U.S. Route 30, but I don't see which one it could be talking about. If I did, I could have added a link on this page. Could someone figure this out, please? Thanks. Allen (Morriswa) (talk) 20:53, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  US&nbsp;30 Alternate
Talk:List of Illinois Civil War units

message: My husband and I caretaker Historical Cemeteries in Smithfield RI. There is one burial that caught our eye because of his service in the Cival War. We would like to more about him. Thanks for your help. 68.9.99.29 (talk) 03:09, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moses Manton Sayles
Talk:Mister Frost

message: No longer available on Netflix!  Don't want to delete the info from the main page, because maybe I'm missing something, but I don't see it under searches for "Mr. Frost," "Mister Frost" or "Jeff Goldblum"...  Maybe international only?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Autrui (talk • contribs) 02:14, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Instant Netflix 
Talk:Steubenville High School

message: Was just going through the notable alumni section and noticed there are people from the 1800's and early 1900's in that list.  Makes me curious as to why the opening date of the school is listed as 1949.  For our purposes at Wikipedia, the school is the institution, not the building it is located in.  This article needs a history section.  Any chance someone local there might do one?  I cannot do the research way out here in the styx, but I'll be happy to help write something if someone can find some sources. John from Idegon (talk) 04:56, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  opening date
Talk:My Favorite Martian (film)

message: Is it worth showing links to BttF?
*Playing with videocameras
*Illustrations on the ship looked like a flux capacitor
*Excessive technobabble
*Ending: sudden unexpected manic return
I'm watching the film for the first time now, will add more details as they become apparent. samwaltz 21:51, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References to [[Back to the Future]]
Talk:Parsippany–Troy Hills School District

message: I think making a page for the school district is a little bit of a stretch, but a page for all of the schools? I think it would make more sense to combine the articles into one article. Having one page with all of the schools on it makes more sense than having 14 (or whatever number) articles that are all short, and very similar.PhorkPhace 03:17, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Endorfun

message: This page is currently WIP.  I plan on adding more details for gameplay types, tile types, and expanding the subliminal messages section.
I seem to recall that this game was banned all over the place and contained messages such as "play more." Has anyone got more concrete recollections? --92.232.144.63 (talk) 00:42, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I found an article in Next Generation which states that Cu-on-pa is not just "a similar game" to Endorfun, but the same game released under a different title. Looking at YouTube videos on Cu-on-pa, it indeed seems to be the same game; the music and background graphics are different, but they also differ between the Super Famicom and PlayStation versions of Cu-on-pa. So, I'm WP: BOLDLY changing the redirect target for Cu-On-Pa to this article and rewriting the relevant bits of this article with the Next Generation article as a reference. If anyone has more information on this, please share it here.--Martin IIIa (talk) 17:21, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cu-on-Pa is Endorfun?
Talk:Anglican Diocese of South Carolina

message: The section on pre-2012 history has been deleted and reverted a couple of times so I would suggest discussing it here.  My view is that it doesn't belong in this article.  The whole thing was moved to the article about the old diocese.  Repeating the exact same material in this article seems silly to me.  Moreover, it has been decided that the Anglican diocese is not the same organization as the pre-2012 diocese.  The Anglicans used to claim they were the successor diocese, but they no longer make that claim (having been legally prohibited from doing so).  In my view, this article should be equally clear that today's diocese is a different entity than the old Episcopal diocese.  IF the pre-2012 history is mentioned here, it needs to be clear that today's Anglican diocese is a different entity from the old and new Episcopal diocese.  That's my opinion, anyway. Dunncon13 (talk) 20:46, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: My view is that a reader should not have to click to another article to get the basic background needed for this article to make sense. I am the editor who has re-added one section of the pre-2012 history (not the entire pre-2012 history) back into the article merely for the sake of providing context. There is no confusion as to which diocese we are talking about, especially after recent edits. Ltwin (talk) 01:25, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pre-2012 history
Talk:8th Illinois Infantry Regiment

message: The separate stub 8th Illinois Infantry Regiment (3 Months) should be merged here. In my view, there is no need to separate out the two eras of the regiment based on the two enlistment terms. The initial history and activities of the regiment in 1861 with its 3-month enlistees can and should be covered here. In any case, the current situation is untenable, as this page is currently the primary topic, but there is no hatnote to the 3 month article. Also, the disambiguation page 8th Illinois Volunteer Infantry Regiment was never moved when these pages were moved to their current titles; this disambiguation page will become unnecessary once the pages are merged and hatnotes updated. Mdewman6 (talk) 21:45, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal
Talk:11th Illinois Cavalry Regiment

message: Article reassessed and graded as stub.   --dashiellx (talk) 18:12, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 
Talk:Barbie syndrome

message: I'm merely a casual reader of Wikipedia, so I don't know how to do this, but I feel that this article should be tagged for a clean-up, because, as of right now, it seems like a place to just accuse celebrities of vanity without any substantive follow-up. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.52.142.4 (talk • contribs).
Agreed. It's badly written and entirely un-cited. Also, even if it can be cited, is it truly notable?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.107.184.123 (talk) 03:49, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I have to say, reading this article, it came across more as unfounded anti-corporate propaganda than an encyclopedia piece. Someone more closesly affiliated with this article should consider a major rewrite. 71.233.119.221 (talk) 23:44, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  This article is reminiscent of a bummy high school paper, and, I think, should be removed, or its details maybe added into another article.  Removal seems more fit, unless some good sources can be added. Obeliab (talk) 18:08, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: tagged for a clean-up

message: This article has barely a paragraph of information. What's the point of it being here? Delierajaytoday (talk) 04:22, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's the reason for this Article? 

message: I took out the notability tag and changed it to refimprove.  It seems to have a lot of google books hits. The article could use some expansion. Comatmebro ~Come at me~ 22:51, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Tags
Talk:Medieval Monuments in Kosovo

message: There's a long history of edit warring on this article in reference to the location. The overall and IMO best version seems to be Kosovo, as this is what it is today, but there's are also edits to Serbia, clearly incorrect,  and the  Autonomous Region of Kosovo. What should be the consensus?Pipsally (talk) 05:04, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe that the country of origin listed (Serbia) on the UNESCO should be put as the location. This is an article about a cultural organisation's list and it shouldn't be overshadowed by de facto and de jure standing of certain territories. As this is an article about the "Medieval Monuments in Kosovo" made by UNESCO with UNESCO listing the country of origin as Serbia then Serbia should be the country of location. Tho, I suppose a footnote explaining the situation should be considered. ILIKESHIPSalot (talk) 21:04, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location
Talk:Analytical Chemistry (journal)

message: Three paragraphs recently added to this article were a direct copy of this page so I have removed them. We can not copy material directly from other sites unless the material is released under a free license. --Bduke  (Discussion) 21:55, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violation
Talk:Sopoćani

message: Hello, 
Overall, I think you have a very informative wiki page. I think you give a very good overview about Sopoćani throughout different time periods. One thing I would add is maybe put a few more sentences in the introduction to give a more well rounded overview. I also would like to know more about the frescoes and I think it would be very interesting if you could provide more information about those. Other than that I think you id a great job.est of luck! 
 
(Hopefully I'm doing this right) 
Samstan (talk) 20:40, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review
Talk:Studenica Monastery

message: Move to "Studenica" as per commonname?--Zoupan 02:27, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes! Those 5,6 most important monasteries should have their names like that, i agree! --Ąnαșταη (ταlκ) 19:35, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name 
Talk:Ship chandler

message: Perhaps this article could be expanded to deal with modern yacht chandlers who serve the leisure marine market, e.g. West Marine.
130.209.241.193 (talk) 12:31, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yacht chandlers 

message: Could an explanation be added? Thank you. deisenbe (talk) 17:56, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The word "chandler"
Talk:The Wizard of Mars

message: Was David L Hewitt really a stage magician? A look at his filmography would indicate that in he was a (rather poor) optical effects artist in addition to a director, but I haven't seen anything that would indicate that he was a magician as well.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.174.66.130 (talk) 16:25, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A poster for the film, seems to be lacking a copyright notice so it is probably public domain. SDudley (talk) 17:18, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poster
Talk:Deception (2008 film)

message: What is this "Important Later" stuff? It really makes the plot sumary look like a review... not to mention is actually too long. Dskzero (talk) 12:22, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Plot is rediculously too long.  However, the edit history suggests that there is not enough interest in the film for anyone to take the time to change it.Pirchlogan (talk) 22:08, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: PLOT
Talk:The Time Travelers (1964 film)

message: Here a German Verion of the Film
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3aSiLqGP2ME  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rasmusklump (talk • contribs) 14:51, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

message: The article states, without any citation or reference, that this movie was remade as "Journey to the Center of Time" (1967). I have seen both movies many times and the plots are completely different. The only things the two movies share in common is that they involve time travel and have a twist ending. Can anyone else back me up on this? I'd love to see the phrase about this movie being remade removed from the article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:600:8180:4460:8DB9:A51:65E2:1E9F (talk) 21:22, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remade as "Journey to the Center of Time" (1967)? 

message: This article lists the release date for this film as April 19, 2022. I don’t know why it lists this date, but it’s obviously wrong. I’d change it myself, but I don’t know the month or day this was released, only the year 1964. Could someone please look into this? 2600:100C:B23E:4610:6502:F112:BD9E:E5EA (talk) 02:32, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong Release Date
Talk:The Sun Comes Up

message: This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB.
Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 17:49, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "needs infobox" tag 

message: Who is the "up-and-coming younger actress" with whom Jeanette MacDonald shares screen time in The Sun Comes Up?  If this refers to Claude Jarman, Jr., who plays the orphan Jerry, the word should be actor. No44ns864962 (talk) 02:20, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Actress or Actor?
Talk:List of newspapers in Wyoming

message: Additional input is welcome below.  There is a request to merge the Casper Star-Tribune, Cody Enterprise, Gillette News-Record, Laramie Boomerang, The Lovell Chronicle, Medicine Bow Post, Rock Springs Daily Rocket-Miner, and Wyoming Tribune Eagle articles into this article. Proposer's rationale: An assortment of stub articles (unlikely to ever be much larger), that I think could all be merged into a single article without problems. --BigPimpinBrah (talk) 19:27, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal
Talk:The Hiding Place (film)

message: This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB.
Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 06:27, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "needs infobox" tag 
Talk:Beretta Rx4 Storm

message: I own one of these in Canada, it is marked and marketed here as the Benelli MR1, prehaps some mention should be included?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.94.24.159 (talk) 23:18, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marketing and Branding 

message: There is an article for the Benelli MR1, so I'll start the process of merging by adding any adtl/relevant information from this article over to that one. I think this gun was called the Beretta RX4 only in videogames. 72.182.214.102 (talk) 16:51, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge to Benelli MR1
Talk:The Breach (Star Trek: Enterprise)

message: this is also an epasode with tribbles in it 
 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.15.131.253 (talk) 04:20, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing reference

message: If you look at the ratings over the run of Enterprise it is almost always the bigger networks NBC, CBS, FOX, ABC jockeying for the top places and the smaller networks UPN and The WB some distance behind (Variety refers to the smaller two as "netlets"). That's why it seems more appropriate and relevant to compare and contrast Enterprise with Dawson's Creek than to point out that FOX got millions more viewers and was top of the ratings yet again with "American Idol." Since McNeill coincidentally directed both Enterprise and Dawson's Creek this week the extra emphasis did not seem undue. 
Also the fast overnight ratings initially had Enterprise ahead of Dawson's Creek but the final weekly average viewer numbers from the LA Times put Dawson's Creek in ahead (102.nd Dawson's Creek WB 3.47 million, versus 104.th Enterprise UPN 3.19 million) 
Please note that I included TrekWeb as a reference not because it was strictly necessary, any objective reader could look at the Nielsen ratings and make the same reasonable observations to summarize the numbers, but to show I was paraphrasing existing analysis. -- 109.76.132.146 (talk) 11:30, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ratings
Talk:Boston 13s

message: Few things: there are a lot of links on this page to people who do not seem to be noteworthy in themselves.  Moreover, almost all of the links to people are links to other people with the same name.  Also, Boston Braves RLFC redirects here, but this is NOT the same club with a new name is it?  Isn't this a totally NEW club?  If so, Braves should not direct here.  Any thoughts?  One more thing.  The source given for the roster does NOT have a complete team list, so I am not sure the whole thing shouldn't be removed.
Rugbyhelp (talk) 03:46, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Links and redirects

message: There's a lot more that's been going on that hasn't been mentioned in this article. We need someone to add to this and bring it up to date.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.70.105.35 (talk) 19:17, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  More information
Talk:Leduc County

message: In response to the removal of the expand tag, here are some similar types of articles to compare on when wanting to expand this article
Brant, Ontario - I believe this also is a county, except in a different province true? Try and (if u know about leduc county) get similar types of info from leduc county.... As one sentence with all these tables just wont cut it. Yes i know it's a stub but i thought an expand article would be better in place, as well it got ur attention didnt it :P
Also im not expecting this straight away but this looks like a good article to compare with in the long run: Chatham-Kent, Ontario, that is also a county true? So yeah. I shall add back the expand tag and if there any objections to it, please discuss in this talk page.... or if u want my talk page. petze 04:10, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:FK Metta

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Consensus to move  to FK Metta per the usual WP:FOOTY naming conventions   Megan☺️ Talk to the monster 16:34, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: FS METTA/Latvijas Universitāte →  – Metta first team rebranded, Metta/Latvijas Universitāte is the reserve team Reiiniis (talk) 09:18, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

text: This is a contested technical request (permalink). Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 15:01, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

text: Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. GiantSnowman 11:21, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 16 August 2020 
Talk:Neil Stonechild

message: I moved the page back to Neil Stonechild.  Adding "The Death of" adds nothing to the article, and does not help people find the info. --Fremte (talk) 01:01, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  unexplained, non-consensual move undonw 

message: I'm a bit concerned about using the Mclean book as a source here - from what I can tell (which is not easy because 'audacious books' is a very common phrase), it's self-published. A self-published book which draws conclusions about a controversial event involving a death -- conclusions which appear to be contrary to those reached by a judicial inquiry.
As such, I'm dubious about whether it meets WP:RS criteria. DS (talk) 15:50, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with @DragonflySixtyseven that using judicial inquiry should be used instead of a self published book. Paladox (talk) 16:10, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  asked me if I would look into this source. First I have corrected the publisher according to the book's record in Worldcat. Influence Publishing is clearly a vanity press and as such the book should be considered WP:SELFPUB. As this this article is using it as a reference for something else other than itself it does not meet our standards of RS and so information cited to it should either be recited to a reliable source or removed in my opinion. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 03:38, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mclean 

message: There’s also a book written about Neil called “Starlight Tour: the Last, Lonely Night of Neil Stonechild” by Susanne Reber and Robert Renaud. It was originally published in 2005 and updated in 2019. 67.53.60.247 (talk) 00:04, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Starlight Tour book
Talk:Ciguapa

message: I found this non English text on the article so moved it here for possible discussion about the translation:Goldenrowley 04:17, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Not English needs translation

message: I will be working on this page soon, does anybody know what type of info box this page needs.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Angel,Isaac (talk • contribs) 17:22, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Work