Talk:Dunking (biscuit)

message: "the equation was published in almost every major UK newspaper. The journalists who published it took great care to get it right, some telephoning several times to check".
Ha Ha, I get it, a journalist actualy tried to get someting right —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 60.228.125.145 (talk) 08:42, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Offtopic comment/joke. NOT a recomentation 

message: I just came across this article while drinking a cup of coffee, and went and fetched my ginger biscuits and started dunking. Mmmmmmm, delicious!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.109.62.228 (talk) 17:22, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thanks, Wikipedia! 

message: Readers of this page might like to know that this website:
http://www.jamieoliver.com/recipes/member-recipes/Top%20ten%20biscuits%20to%20dunk%20in%20tea/4176
lists the Top Ten biscuits for dunking in tea. Should they be included in the article? ACEOREVIVED (talk) 21:05, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Best biscuits for dunking in tea

message: I'd like to recommend these fantastic techniques, as I was growing bored of the usual "Fracture Technique" as mentioned in the article. The amount of various biscuit-related dunks are astounding, and they have really helped me improve my tea and biscuit routine and can now confirm I am gradually becoming more adapted to the intermediate guide! Thanks guys!
___cjr___ (talk) 19:57, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The techniques are outstanding! 

message: I don't know, but the teashop that outlawed it in 2007 isn't a good example, as it also "The stringent rules at the Tea Cosy Rooms include not putting your elbows on the table, not insulting the Queen, never handling sugar cubes and not sipping from teaspoons. Visitors are advised that their little fingers should not point into the air, tapping a teaspoon against a cup and using a mobile phone is banned outright." We can't use that as an example for this anymore than we could use it as an example for saying opinion on handling sugar cubes or pointing little fignres into the air is divided. Doug Weller (talk) 14:34, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed - the website for the Tea Cosy Rooms advertises itself as eccentric and quirky - the 'ban' is just an advertising gimmick (one that seems to have worked). I'll re-word that sentence until better citations come to light. sheridan (talk) 13:42, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  UK opinion divided? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Dunking (biscuit). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110929141349/http://www.arte.tv/fr/connaissance-decouverte/karambolage/Cette-semaine/Emission-du-13-Juillet-2008/2106110,CmC=2107242.html to http://www.arte.tv/fr/connaissance-decouverte/karambolage/Cette-semaine/Emission-du-13-Juillet-2008/2106110,CmC=2107242.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:34, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians, 
We have a disagreement with Drmies regarding the existence of Cultural references section. He keeps on removing it, instead of improving it, and claming it's useless. My point of view is that it is useful, and if necessary, it should be improved, rather than removed. 
Furthermore, if the author of "trivial mentions" reads this, could you kindly amend your contribution to Drmies satisfaction?
Below is our exchange of messages. Please, share your point of view. 
    Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dunking (biscuit). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
    If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
    If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
    Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Two things: you reinserted unverified and trivial information, and you didn't even bother to explain. Drmies (talk) 02:00, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request other editors' help