lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hooked on Phonics

message: Um, are we planning to include a lengthy paragraph on the page of every company that has sold customer lists to third parties? Sheesh. You could spend a week on an article named List of companies that sell customer information to third parties.  --KeithTyler
:Hey, I'll take any excuse to flesh out a stub. Rhymeless 07:56, 8 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: So shouldn't you include a criticism section? If I recall correctly, HoP was horribly ineffective. --Muna 19:07, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bit on consumer privacy

message: I'm a deltionist, but this article does not qualify as a speedy.  Give me a moment to drum up some sources and neutralize it.  It reads like 80% of the existing co. articles on WP: a history section, ownership, etc.  UnitedStatesian 05:14, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hangon

message: — Assignment last updated by Green Hierophant (talk) 10:43, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: LING A201 How English Works
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Judaism

message: There is a requested move at Weaponization of antisemitism that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Mistamystery (talk) 21:14, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move at [[Talk:Weaponization_of_antisemitism#Requested_move_21_April_2024|Weaponization of antisemitism]] 

message: I've made a GA nomination for Kennicott Bible. If anyone is interested in reviewing this that would be great. Many thanks. Uriel1022 (talk) 23:40, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA review request 

message: Got asked a really odd question off line. What is the proper way to reference the specific Niqqud for a torah portion? Something like Berakhah is easier, it is a word used today in Israel. However, I'm wondering more like Selah, where "its etymology and precise meaning are unknown." How do you reference that the vowel on the lamed?Naraht (talk) 17:35, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference for niqqud 

message: :Talk:Israel has an RfC. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. FortunateSons (talk) 12:00, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Talk:Israel]] has an [[Talk:Israel#RfC:_mention_apartheid_in_the_lead?|RfC on the topic: mention apartheid in the lead?]] 

message: Hello!
I started Split of Christianity and Judaism in February. It is more than a one-person job, and I haven't been able to contribute significantly to it in months. This is an important article, and I'd love to see it improved.
Thanks! Zanahary (talk) 02:05, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vital article [[Split of Christianity and Judaism]] needs help
Talk:RealAudio

message: The statement in the article that BBC no longer uses the format is incorrect.  I found it in use on some BBC german streams on 4/17/12.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.62.146.171 (talk) 15:42, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

message: This codec is accompanied by spyware, that allows ads to pop-up on the user's computer. 
Have deleted this sentence; will gladly put it back in on receipt of some proof/confirmation. --Palapala 07:46, 2004 Jul 8 (UTC)
I've removed the Spyware section.  The references therein were with regards to RealPlayer, and any such criticism would belong in that article, not this one. Preppy 06:10, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Spyware?

message: RealAudio is the devil —Preceding unsigned comment added by Avochelm (talk • contribs) 
:No, it's just a crippled audio format/player that should soon be obsolete. —Down10 T / C 06:24, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This page describes the audio format.  The RealPlayer article discusses the product and the criticism it has received.  I see no reason to duplicate that information here, and this article does mention the controversy and some of the alternatives available to those who do not want to use RealPlayer. -- Mcoder 17:57, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Devil format

message: Are there any applications out there (other than realaudio) which enabme realmedia files and streamed content to be played. An old (c 1999) ISP CD I had enables windows media player (presumably via a plugin) to play some realmedia content although I havent been able to identify the plugin 80.229.222.48 (talk) 18:01, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternative applications for playback of realaudio content 

message: Why do so many broadcasters use Realaudio for streaming their services on the internet when there are other (IMNSHO) far better codecs out there which arent tied into proprietry playback software ?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.229.222.48 (talk) 18:04, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why do so many broadcasters use it for streaming
Talk:Mascarenhas de Morais

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 11:25, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 
Talk:Casio

message: it seems to not be in the list
https://www.casio.com/us/scientific-calculators/product.FX-260SOLARII/ 169.244.131.100 (talk) 12:50, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  fx-260SOLAR II 

message: Man 43.242.209.105 (talk) 13:31, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Casio
Talk:5.56×45mm NATO

message: The US “Cartridge, 5.56mm, ball, M193” was just the US military’s name for .223 Remington, as stated in the article. As such, this cartridge is distinct from the “5.56x45mm NATO” cartridge as it predate’s NATO’s adoption of the SS109 cartridge and is built within the .223 spec (chamber pressure of 52,000PSI, below the spec of 55,000). 
As such, I think M193 should be listed in the ballistic performance section in the .223 Remington article rather than this one. 2600:4040:5F52:1600:CD1E:1676:E0C1:43B7 (talk) 01:39, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is M193 listed under ballistic performance? 

message: Im not an editor so ill place this request here. The line "developed in the late 1970s in Belgium by FN Herstal" needs to be moved from the summary or further clarified, as even the source cited does not mention this. It should read something along the lines of "the nomenclature used by NATO for their standard of the 223 remington cartridge." 72.23.215.113 (talk) 00:35, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Developed by FN?
Talk:Svecoman movement

message: Tuomas, please do not revert. Svekoman is in swedish, svecoman is English. Your google test shows too much Swedish texts. It seems that you do not have an English ear.
:My apologies if I judged your edits by the impression you made with your other changes of spellings and names to forms less known in English. Please compare:
:* google svekoman OR svekomans -Wikipedia
:** Ilkka Huovio at Helsinki University of Art and Design
:** Leena Huss at Åbo Akademi
:** The EMVET-project at University of Jyväskylä
:** [www.stormfront.org/archive/t-78413 Nazis at Stormfront.org]
:* google svecoman OR svecomans -Wikipedia
:** Markus Myllyoja at Tampere University (2003)
:** Jon Stefansson at King's College (1916)
:** Encyclopedia Britannica (1911)
:** Johanna Rainio at the Smallcons project (2003)
:/Tuomas 09:03, 9 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Svekoman vs. Svecoman

message: A discussion of the relative impact of protestant and orthodox religions is missing AlainV 05:03, 5 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Religious aspect 

message: There are quite a lot of problems with this article. For instance, the statement that the Svecomans were more conservative, the  Fennomans more liberal. This is far too simplistic. There were some very illiberal elements amongst some Fennomans. The reality is, especially on the Fennoman side, that this groupings were not unified in nature. There were, if you like, different flavours of Fennoman.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.73.201.69 (talk) 16:06, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It would be great if someone could expand on this, with references and data LookingGlass (talk) 13:55, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Simplistic

message: The article is unreferenced.  It was originally flagged as such in 2007 but the flag has been placed at the foot of the article.  I have placed a new flag at the head of the article.  While the article appears sound to me without references the validity of the statements is impossible to substantiate and their authority is compromised. LookingGlass (talk) 13:47, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unreferenced
Talk:Paleolithic

message: I think this article needs to be culled of the information and theories sourced from Vincent W. Fallio. He doesn't seem to be a reputable scholar in the field, and his book that's cited often here is not published by a reputable press. Thoughts? NealBhattacharya (talk) 20:56, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Vincent W. Fallio

message: You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Neolithic § Why not "Neolithic era" or "Neolithic age".   —GoldRingChip 14:21, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion at [[:Talk:Neolithic#Why not "Neolithic era" or "Neolithic age"|Talk:Neolithic §&nbsp;Why not "Neolithic era" or "Neolithic age"]]

message: https://archaeologie.bemerkenswelt.de/en this is ground-breaking stuff, the images are satellite imagery from Google Earth so there's no doubt about that, it has placemarks of all stone age formations in Africa and Middle east! TL;DR Africa and Middle east were far more populated.
Implement this large chunk of knowledge somewhere on the page, maybe even in a theories section! I hope the idea gets to the scientific community so they can research it more.. 178.221.182.108 (talk) 10:22, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: That looks like a very unreliable source and I doubt we can use it. The majority of the images on that page are of desert kites, which are well-studied and which we have a good article on, and keyhole monuments (monuments en trou de serrure), which we don't have an article on (yet) but are also known and dated. Neither are Palaeolithic, nor signs of particularly high population densities in the past. – Joe (talk) 11:42, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes - the site is fun, but on a non-exhaustive look it doesn't claim anything about the Paleolithic anyway.  Indeed, all comments I saw about dating were admirably vague and cautious.  Johnbod (talk) 12:17, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  undeniable things about the population in Africa and Middle east in the Paleolithic
Talk:ATI

message: Shouldn't this point to ATI Technologies, with a disambig message there? Twinxor t 02:44, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: disambiguation 2005

message: ATI currently redirects to ATI Technologies (rather than Ati (disambiguation) or similar). However, that company no longer exists as such since 2007, and indeed the brand has also been obsoleted since 2010. The linked article doesn't include the history of the brand since 2006, so I'm disambiguating references to the term "ATI" so it's clearer what is meant, also with the help of the new ATI (brand) redirect. Eventually, we may be able to change where ATI points to. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 19:30, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: disambiguation 2012
Talk:Dingley

message: A search of this suburb name at Melway Online turned up no results. There will be no VFD nomination for now, as a suburb by this name may have existed prior to postcode area rearrangements. TPK 11:52, 8 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a hard call. Most of the results in a Google search are for hotels in the area. There's a few addresses, but few enough that I'm inclined to think that it's just an unofficial name for an area. It wouldn't be the only one. Ambivalenthysteria 15:12, 8 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Synon

message: Is this page about the (defunct?) Synon company or the Synon/Cool/Advantage/AllFusion (or whatever its name is this week) 2e product? Suggest split.
Parts of this article reads more like sales materials than an objective description. Not to denigrate the 2e product/platform, but it is hardly an object oriented language in any accepted sense of the term (i.e., by folks outside of marketing land!). Figures on how many lines of high level language (COBOL? lack of citations!) code are typical marketing -- surely we all have experience with what generated code tends to look like? It might be tight, but bloat is the norm. 
When it appeared, I believe the sales hype was more focused around it as a 4GL (fourth generation language) platform rather than 'ARAD', whatever that is supposed to mean, which it remains today: heavily data centric, excellent for generating standard interactions which are close to one's data model and conform to one of its templates, but monolithic, unlayered and hard to extend or adapt for new usages (e.g. service interfaces, workflow automation, web and mobile UI's). Much like other 4GL tools: clear strengths when working within its original scope, but with decided drawbacks in a modern context. 
I don't quite feel I have the requisite depth of experience to amend the article, and wouldn't want to get into any religious issues unneccessarily. Any takers?wish you all the best 
--Pgagge 12:12, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split: company and product. Product bias. Lack of context and comparisons.
Talk:Menudo (group)

message: There's a new HBO documentary series that covers a lot of the band's history. Much of it is about sexual abuse and neglect allegations against management.Obviously, this topic should be treated very sensitively with a neutral point of view, but at this point, I feel like there there are just enoughreliable, third party, verifiable sources covering it that there should be a section about it. It seems this subject has been covered extensively in the Spanish language press for ~25 years. Is there a consensus against this sort of thing? Kire1975 (talk) 12:16, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate allegations section?
Talk:Phobos (moon)

message: Yes, we do know it to about 1 ms. See http://exp.arc.nasa.gov/downloads/celestia/data/solarsys.ssc. Remember that you can observe over a great number of revolutions and the divide by that number, so precision grows with time.
Urhixidur 17:12, 2004 Sep 2 (UTC)
I believe we can time a single revolution to that accuracy.  Will subsequent orbits vary by less than 1ms?  Surely Mars is not that uniform, perturbation by Jupiter must be on that order of magnitude.  Unfortunately I don't know how to calculate either of those effects, so I guess I'll take your word for it.  --Doradus 19:11, 2 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with Urhixidur.  The reverse or the above is true- I expect we can't time a single revolution to that accuracy(I doubt the position is known that well), but we can time many of them and take the average, just as Urhixidur describes.   The orbital period should be quite uniform, I believe.  Mars' gravity should be the same during each orbit- no change in period resulting from there- and the gravity gradient from Jupiter should be extremely small.  The constant component of any pull from Jupiter or another body will effect both Mars and Phobos equally, and thus cannot influence the period.  Diemos might conceivably be relevant, however, though I think the orbit period is by definition an average anyhow. --Noren 20:34, 2 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you're right about Jupiter's pull.  I disagree on the other points, but not strongly enough to kick up a fuss.  :-)  --Doradus 04:25, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Millisecond precision in orbit period 

message: "As seen from Phobos, Mars would be 6400 times larger and 2500 times brighter than the full Moon as seen from Earth" it isn't supposed to be as seen from Mars, Phobos...?
: No. Phobos looks tiny as seen from Mars. Mars looks huge as seen from Phobos. So it's correct. The Singing Badger 01:04, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: As seen from...
Talk:Jamaican tangelo

message: I think that this article should be merged into the tangelo article.  UGLI is a registered trademark for a type of tangelo, however, given that the product goes under several other names from other growers (i.e. the "Uniq" label, which is not trademarked), it isn't really proper to describe the product itself under one specific trademark.  Given that it meets all requirements as a tangelo and UGLI consistently markets it as a type of tangelo, it seems logical to merge it into the tangelo article, and convert this page into a redirect.
I'll do so in a couple days unless anyone has any concerns. Riotgear 11:01, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it's been a couple days.  But I agree completely.  From what I can tell, it is merely a trademarked variety of tangelo. -Verdatum (talk) 19:18, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge into [[tangelo]]? 

message: The title of the article calls it the Ugli fruit, but the article itself refers to it as ugly fruit, what should be done about this? -- Kyzza1Talk  02:20, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistent 

message: "The taste is often described as more sour than an orange and less bitter than a tangerine, however, and is more commonly guessed to be a lemon-tangerine hybrid."
I've never tasted a bitter tangerine, only sweet or sour. Is this correct?
: Such descriptions can only be subjective, of course, but to me they taste like grapefruit, but sweet rather than bitter, with a hint of orange flavor as well.  I would not characterize the flavor as "bitter," except in instances where the fruit is not fully ripe.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.61.156.96 (talk) 16:54, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bitter tangerine?
Talk:The Rowdyruff Boys

message: The older version is the latest entry under The Rowdyruff Boys page by me. I don't understand the person's objection to the content that I submitted. I stated in the document that there were many fans that wanted these characters to return. Note, I said many, not most. It's not my POV; it's a statement about the desires of the public as a whole. It would be like saying "many people like the flavor of Pepsi," even though Coca-Cola sells more product tham Pepsi. He also demanded proof of there being "many" fans. I provided him with a link to an online petition with over 450 signatures from people who wanted the characters' episode to re-air on Canadian television. I also have many, many fan emails that I have accumulated over the past four years that support the statement that these characters have "many fans." These observations aren't hearsay. They have been experienced by me first hand. I have tried to accomodate whatever possible issues this person may have with the entry, but to no avail. --King Moonraiser 19:56, 7 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  First Dispute
Talk:Claudio Naranjo

message: The homepage given was not coming up on the day I tried it (july 8, 2004) Oska 12:47, 8 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: It's just the idea that our emotional state affects our cognitive ability. 24.125.133.143 (talk) 00:49, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article casts the subject as the "principle developer" of the Enneagram of Personality, not mentioning that Oscar Ichazo was the originator, nor the court cases which established this. Subject was likely a plagiarist, and the court cases may have established this, though I am not certain about that. Skyerise (talk) 15:02, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I knew Claudio rather well and worked for / with him from 1997 to 2011. I once asked him about this very issue. He responded that he had, like everyone else, signed an agreement to not teach the enneagram. Then at some point wrote Oscar a letter asking for permission to teach. I asked what was Oscar´s response. Claudio said he didn´t answer and I took that as a yea. Mysticsmick (talk) 16:37, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disputed
Talk:The Scaffold

message: I look for this CD album for a long time.I'm from Poland.Please tell me how to get it?
Walf.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.72.161.121 (talk) 20:37, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  To get "Very Best of Scaffold" 

message: Why is there no reference to John Gorman?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.196.83.175 (talk) 16:36, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Name. 

message: I've added a sentence or two to reflect how important Andy Roberts' contribution was to The Scaffold. He was very much the 'silent partner' in the band but they wouldn't have been able to function musically without him.
HippyGumbo (talk) 14:24, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I see he has his own article. But I think you'll need to provide some kind of source(s) for that claim? Martinevans123 (talk) 14:46, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: It is a bold assertion, I suppose. Aside from contemporary album credits, sleeve notes and the anecdotal recollections of the three core members themselves (who were and are more than willing to attest to their own musical limitations) there isn't much material I can link to or cite as reference as per Wikipedia's criteria, unfortunately. However, I'll dig around and see what I can find. HippyGumbo (talk) 18:46, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, a bit too bold for the lead, I think. You are very probably quite right, so I hope you find something. Martinevans123 (talk) 19:50, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm, on reflection and in light of a lack of adequate attribution, I've decided to qualify the text in question a little and move it from the header paragraph into the main body of the article that details the musicians who played on The Scaffold's records. I think that's a fair compromise, but if anyone wants to debate further I'm quite open to it. Thanks for your input Martin.HippyGumbo (talk) 20:10, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Andy Roberts