lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Anita Garibaldi

message: Without sources it's hard to distinguish urban legends from fact. For one, a statue dedicated to Anita had been discussed for many years and a plot of land was assigned to it by the national government in April 1928, while the article makes it sound as if it was commissioned by Mussolini in 1929 to spite the Vatican. Second, the fact that the request of the Vatican is mentioned to be "unofficial" sounds like a recipe for unsourced claims, similar to other ones that I've seen over the Garibaldi monument (e.g., that it would've been moved from facing the Vatican after the Lateran Treaty of 1929, or that the Anita monument would've been built to give the impression that Garibaldi was facing her rather than the Vatican, or that it would have been an olive branch to anti-clerical elements within the government who were upset about the Lateran Treaty, etc.). Daydreamers (talk) 21:09, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gianicolo statue
Talk:Church of the Province of Central Africa

message: Apart from the Traditional Anglican Communion, the article should really consider verifying whether groups within the Church of the Province of Central Africa have ever sought a similar canonical structure to the proposed personal ordinariates. ADM (talk) 18:08, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Talk:Personal Ordinariate
Talk:Teledyne FLIR

message: Should there be a link to Forward looking infrared in this article, if that's what the company's named after? Jason McHuff (talk) 06:29, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, along with a statement explaining the name. There's probably an article in the Portland Business Journal with that info. Aboutmovies (talk) 07:23, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: FLIR=Forward Looking InfRared?

message: Seattle Times Aboutmovies (talk) 08:10, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: File:FLIR entrance sign.JPG Already have a pics, just waiting for article to expand enough to use it. Aboutmovies (talk) 20:50, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Guess I won't ride down there tomorrow then. Thanks! tedder (talk) 23:54, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

text: Here's the court judgement, and a slightly confusing local summary. We should also be able to tie this to Cannabis in Oregon because of the Kyllo v. United States case. More: "seven years since Kyllo".  tedder (talk) 17:42, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source for expansion/citations 

message: Hello,
I'm new to Wikipedia and would like to update this entry. My previous attempt at this was not up to Wikipedia's standards, so it was suggested I post my re-write here to get the community's feedback and suggestions. This is intended to build upon the existing content and citations, but adding some of the more recent activities. I ask for your patience as I learn the tools used here (especially the citation tool, which seems to have flattened my learning curve considerably). Any help would be greatly appreciated. Ampersand82 (talk) 17:45, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, thanks - I've moved the content you pasted here to User:Ampersand82/FLIR_Systems so that it can be worked on there (by yourself, and by other users if you don't mind) - and then that page can be deleted when the content has been moved into the article. Looking at that page I can see several opportunities for improvement - (1) there's a lot of "currently", "now" etc, (2) we don't normally use state abbreviations (OR, FL etc) in wp and (3) there are some problems with the refs. DexDor (talk) 18:05, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you very much, DexDor! I don't mind others working on the entry on that page at all. I'd prefer to receive feedback so that I can learn from other, more experienced users, but not to the point of discouraging others from providing input. I think I've taken care of your points 1 and 2 now. Can you tell me what the problems with the refs are? Is it a matter of broken links or the quality of the sources? I know I need to figure out how to refer to the same source multiple times instead of linking to it repeatedly. I saw that "how to" the other day, but can't seem to find it again. Off to read more...! EDIT -- found and corrected the problems.Ampersand82 (talk) 21:13, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  FLIR Systems -- Updating entry
Talk:Peter Pan Records

message: Did anybody else know there was another record label named "Peter Pan Records" during the 1990's that dealt in obscure alternative rock music? I've been trying to look for that. ---------User:DanTD (talk)  14:26, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another Peter Pan Records 

message: Considering that Power Records redirects here, it's odd the article would make no mention of it. I added info about Power as well as the comic book sets and major licenses such as Star Trek. 70.73.90.119 (talk) 13:49, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Added missing info
Talk:Peter Lang (publisher)

message: This article has been reverted by a bot to  as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) This has been done to remove User:Accotink2's contributions as they have a history of extensive copyright violation and so it is assumed that all of their major contributions are copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. VWBot (talk) 13:46, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Pet Supplies "Plus"

message: This article reads like a corporate brochure. Is there a way to make it seem more impartial?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.191.189.74 (talk) 04:38, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Inded. I did some drastic editing, and there remains some repetition to remove. There is also one remaining contradictory statement: the lede says all the stories are franchised, the history section says that some are.  DGG ( talk ) 23:56, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Point of View Problem
Talk:Perry's Ice Cream

message: Why no sugar free ice cream? I agree up in western N.Y. where Perrys cream was available in all the stores. My favorite ice cream has always been Perrys black raspberry. Yummy!   My husband has told 2 diabetes. It is all but impossible to find sugar free ice cream. The only I've cream we buy is Klondike bars because that's all we can find with low sugar. There must be many others people in  western N.Y. who are  iabetic and love ice cream. Sugar free ice cream is about non  existent.  Please step up to the plate and consider  manufacturing sugar free ice cream!
Sincerely, Lynn  Kester.,  77 Morris St., M a yville, N. Y. 76.180.16.197 (talk) 13:42, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sugar free ice cream
Talk:Corbans

message: The Corbans article as it stands is fairly meagre. However, there is potential for it to be a more extensive and interesting article, as Corbans has a rich history, in a way that PRNZ doesn't.--Limegreen 09:58, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestion to merge Corbans with PRNZ

message: I propose that Montana Wines be merged into this article. They are largely the same content and Montana Wines is now a brand of this company. Mattlore (talk) 01:36, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Further more, Montana doesn't even exist as a brand now, having been renamed to Brancott Estate. What a dog's breakfast this has become. Did PRNZ flog off Corbans to Lion Nathan at some point, or did I imagine that? This and other questions should probably be answered in an article somewhere. In fact Corbans Wines also has an interesting history, which now no longer involves the Corban family (who now run Ngatarawa Wines), but it has been merged into PRNZ, even though they seem to have been sold off to Lion. Jon (talk) 01:46, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: This article needs major re-work:
# PRNZ is now Pernod Ricard Winemakers
# Pernod Ricard sold Corbans and Lindauer to the Lion/Indevin partnership in 2010
# Corbans Wines should not redirect here
# The history section of this article (which seems to be the history section from the old Corbans Wines article) should be moved, either to the Lion article, or a re-created Corbans Wines article (are they still notable enough?)
I'll leave this here, but if nobody cares, I'll just do this over the next month or so. Jon (talk) 08:58, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rework
Talk:Tutor Perini

message: According to SEC filings, Blum Capital Partners, LP, now owns fewer than 1,000 shares of Perini.  Total insider ownership (which includes 10% owners) is about 25%.  (Figures from EDGAR Online via Yahoo! Finance.)  Is there some other (non-reportable) mechanism by which Blum could control the company, or is he now out of the picture?  FWIW, Tutor still controls about 10% of the float.  121a0012 05:09, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blum 

message: This article definitely needs some help from those that know who Richard Blum is. The majority of what the company has achived is because of his wifes political influence. Alot of this is referenced on Richards and his Wives http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dianne_Feinstein] articles.Woods01 (talk) 20:57, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  missing controversy
Talk:PEOPLEnet

message: These article appears to be of non encyclopedic value and designed more as a part of a commercial campaign to noble a competitive advantage of the focus of the article.  bias.  It is proposed that this article be removed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.243.156.214 (talk) 13:54, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Yining

message: Why is the city name Chinese?  Its name is Kuldja.  Just because China controls XinJiang doesn't mean we should HAN-ify everything.+
:Because Yining is the modern ENGLISH COMMONNAME and the page is located at that namespace. You could petition to move the page to Gulja (not Kuldja) but personally I'd be against it. If the city is known as anything else in English, thanks to the Russo-Chinese incidents over it in the 19th century it's still Ili and not either of present ones. That said, a modern American or British traveler in 'Shinjang' looking for 'Gulja' would be reading guidebooks and talking to each other about 'Xinjiang' and 'Yining'.  — LlywelynII 09:43, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Why

message: no mention of the gulja massacre????
:It's Wikipedia. You could find some reliable sources and add it yourself.  — LlywelynII 09:43, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Massacre

message: Per this edit, the usage of the page was established as American English. Kindly maintain it consistently.  — LlywelynII 09:57, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: ENGVAR
Talk:People's Insurance Company of China

message: I finally figured out why this article People's Insurance Company of China was linked to (:zh:中国人民财产保险 instead (Which was fixed in January 2020; see also , , ). Because this en-wiki article was about both PICC and its listed subsidiary PICC P&C, and the content slanted to PICC P&C in the past, but was occupying the wrong article title People's Insurance Company of China. Only some time later people changed the content slanted back to PICC itself, but forget to fixing interwiki link. Matthew hk (talk) 05:26, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content warning
Talk:Penrith Co-operative Society

message: If you live in (or visit) Penrith, you might be able to ask the co-op for a copy of their annual report, so you can add to the article:
* number of members
* number of employees
* turnover, profit (surplus) and dividend
That would be interesting and helpful. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 17:26, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Numbers?
Talk:Pinewood Technologies

message: This entire section borders on being libelous, and appears to be written by someone with a grudge.
A neutral description of Pendragon's US operations would be beneficial, otherwise, removal of this section might be best?
Thanks Kevinbrighton (talk) 22:13, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Entry into North American market 

message: I've changed the wikilink from Triumph Motors to Triumph Motorcycles. The motorcycles are in production, but there haven't been any new Triumph cars in years (while the brand is still held by BMW, it is dormant). Peridon (talk) 17:10, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Triumph 

message: The logo has been updated 
https://www.pendragonplc.com/
https://www.am-online.com/news/dealer-news/2020/06/29/pendragon-rebrand-to-power-evans-halshaw-stratstone-and-car-store
94.8.8.165 (talk) 14:34, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Dormskirk (talk) 14:52, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo
Talk:Servisair

message: The article needs a section on Servisair's somewhat unusual labour relations practices. At present the company has locked out staff at Vancouver International Airport, and last year there was a lockout at Halifax. I can't figure out why the company is locking out its unionized workers (since in general lockouts are pretty rare, certainly less common than strikes). The article in the Globe and Mail  doesn't explain why the company took this measure, and obviously the union web sites  are not objective. I couldn't find anything about it on the company's own web site (servisair.com). Mathew5000 (talk) 06:20, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  labour relations 

message: http://www.servisaircargo.com/Uploads/Master/PDFs/UK%20THCs%20Oct08%20-%20Sept%2009.pdf has the Servisair address
WhisperToMe (talk) 05:03, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Stuff
Talk:Rob Pelinka

message: I agree, this article has no place in an encyclopedia  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.242.23.104 (talk) 00:41, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: I have not been able to find out what type of High School All-American Pelinka was, but my best guess is that he was an Academic All-American.  Any help would be nice.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM)  06:38, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  All-American 
Talk:Scheels Arena

message: Just wondering why it was thought UND had to be mentioned in here?  I am not sure the relevance of the info. --Ndstate 02:07, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Former Coach 
Talk:Peepal Tree Press

message: This source is on Wordpress, which isn't ideal, but it's a reproduction of the author's original article — attributed to The Weekender Supplement of Sint Maarten’s The Daily Herald (dated Saturday 22 October 2011). If I can find the original source in a digitised way (or the page reference for the print publication), I'll use that instead.
Lewisguile (talk) 13:29, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Memo from LA LA Land link (seeking alternative)

message: I've replaced most of the primary sources that were the publisher's own website with new sources. This has allowed me to add new information, where appropriate, from those sources. I think the article should be more informative now and have greater contextual relevance. As a result, I've gone ahead and removed the template. If you think there are any more primary sources that should be replaced, please give me a shout and I'll try to help out. Lewisguile (talk) 15:08, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Excessive primary sources" template now removed
Talk:Peel Engineering Company

message: I'm debating with myself whether to yank the list of interior links further down the page.  There's the argument that those are all pertinent articles, but then there's the (IMO excellent) point that those only need to be cited once in the body of their appropriate articles (fairing subpages are probably unnecessary, cars are cited inline - with the exception of the P55 prototype, and the boats are mentioned on the West Marine Ltd. article.  Do any other companies enjoy full, upfront listings of their myriad devices?  Wouldn't the Mitsubishi page look like a certain part of the human anatomy if they did the same?  In short, does anyone have any thoughts on what logic should reign here? Orethrius 09:57, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm going to pull the automotive links - the Peel P55 is now mentioned as the appropriate prototype in the Peel P50 page, and the rest are linked in the introductory paragraph. Orethrius 10:10, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  A quick Google around the world found exactly ZERO links to Peel Hovercraft that didn't redirect to some recreational company based in Boca Raton (exaggeration, but certainly nothing on the Isle of Man).  I'm going to pull it as unsubstantiated, and the Go-karts go too if I can't find evidence of their existence.  The other removals should be fairly self-explanatory. Orethrius 10:16, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Links 

message: This article has a whole bunch of UK categories/tags at the bottom of the page, but as the Isle of Man page is keen to point out, the Isle of Man is not part of the UK.  :-)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.16.40.113 (talk) 20:31, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nit pickery 

message: I think it is important to keep this article as an example of Isle of Man manufacturing, but you will notice I have included the dates of formation and dissolution as taken from the Isle of Man Companies Registry to avoid any confusion with the newly formed UK company.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maugholdman (talk • contribs) 23:04, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Company 
Talk:Peapod

message: According to various news articles at least. I'm not sure if they're Skokie-based or Chicago-based, but this seems like something relevant to add. I'm not going to add it though as I'm close friends with an employee there and don't want to contribute any bias! -76.245.13.173 (talk) 03:14, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peapod is based in Chicago now? 

message: There is http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-enters-settlement-agreement-peapod-ensure-peapod-grocery-delivery-website but other sources only quote from it. I am unable to access http://www.peapod.com/ , but maybe someone who can could add a paragraph? --Calmansi (talk) 09:19, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  A section about Peapod and accessibility? 

message: It's merged with Giant Foods and Stop & Shop since Ahold Delhaize has pretty much phased out the stand-alone website/brand.
Idk, it seems like Peapod is all but dead at this point. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 16:50, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peapod update
Talk:Peacocks (clothing)

message: I feel that the sentences are rather choppy and ill-formed. Not very good sentence flow. How to better fix this? (may be due to lack of adequate information) S2d.green (talk) 00:48, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammar and Sentence Structure 

message: No longer in administration. 400 stores but 200 will be closed permanently. Percy2345 (talk) 21:20, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peacocks 

message: Peacocks page needs updating. There are now only 200 stores left. Percy2345 (talk) 01:43, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peacocks update
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Daniel Brandt deletion wheel war/Workshop

message: All administrators involved should be desysopped and put back up for RFA immediately. Situations like these are why administrative recall is so necessary, many of these people should not be administrators and the community, not just some elites, should have the ability to rescind the trust that has been granted onto these people that has been betrayed. Just Heditor review 00:16, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Basically the same thing was tried with Stevertigo and worked poorly, I doubt the same measure will be taken again. Christopher Parham (talk) 01:15, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia's government is really a mess, isn't it? I have no clue otherwise how this can be fairly fixed. Just Heditor review 01:46, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Idea and Opinion

message: Maybe people should stick to discussing the merits and flaws of each proposal and dispense with the "endorsements" and opposition declarations.  ArbCom has made it clear in the past that they will make unpopular decisions if need be, and I can't see this sort of pseudo-voting going anywhere but down if a decisions passes that has a lot of "opposition".  And I'm sure no one wants to act like they have some sayso here and then find out that they don't... Milto LOL pia 22:39, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  I endorse/I oppose
Talk:French units of measurement/Archive 1

message: Paul, can you provide any evidence for your "old are" being a unit that was actually used by anyone?  Or is it just a matter of the people defining the are when the metric system was defined referred to it as being roughly two old "perches carrées" (or whatever the plural form would be)? Gene Nygaard 15:04, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Old are
Talk:Pavilions (supermarket)

message: a Bot reverted everything I added to this page and I am curious to know why?--Angeleyez0116 (talk) 00:13, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

message: @ Manorout, I reverted your edit which contributed nothing. 
"it also houses many garda ratz in its Swords branch."
Lame attempt at humor or vandalism?  Either way, reverted.  17.255.233.9 (talk) 23:41, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  WTF?
Talk:Paul Hastings

message: Yes, everyone, I know the photo is awful because I happened to be in Los Angeles on one of the few days it rained this year in California.  If anyone can take a better photo when the sun is shining, feel free to upload to the same title as my photo and replace it.  --Coolcaesar 06:10, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The photo I just added

message: As per this.  Tag should stay til someone independent of the company reviews this article carefully and confirms they have done so here. Jytdog (talk) 15:12, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI
Talk:Paul Raymond Publications

message: There seems to be an inconsistency in the article about the date of its founding. Was the company started in 1964 or were his publication efforts started in 1964 since it later says that the company started with 1971 and 1972 publication purchases.A1Houseboy (talk) 06:46, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  When Founded?
Talk:Paul K. Guillow, Inc.

message: I know that NuCraft Toys had three games. "The Lindy Flying Game," "Crash," and "Flying Fun." 
It seems that Parker Brothers brought the Lindy game from Nucraft Toys and shelved it in favor of their game "Lindy, the New Flying Game." About this time also the firm moved, started doing business under PKG Inc., and focused on toy airplanes instead of games.  
Um297zoa (talk) 21:41, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled