lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Portal vein thrombosis

message: Currently, there are only 2 citations utilized for the article. One is written in a surgical journal on management and the other places PVT in the context as being a complication of splenectomy (and is from a journal >12 years old without giving DOI information or embedded hyperlink). The etiologies don’t give a sense of frequency of each cause (i.e. degree to which it contributes to PVT). In addition, neither of these journals are open-access (the >$30 price tag for each limits further examination of source content). I have identified several sources (reputable academic books and medical guidelines) that seem sound at first glance. Based on the content therein, I'll make edits that the literature reaches consensus on.
In addition, based on ability to verify information, certain sections may be added to maintain consistency with other Wikipedia articles on Medicine.  ALL of the already-existing sections need more detail.
The 2 images currently included are CT scans. A figure representing the anatomy may be more helpful for the average reader. Mizrebel83 (talk) 04:44, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Lack of references
Talk:Proglucagon

message: Should this page be merged with the Glucagon page?  They both refer to the same NCBI gene id.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by I9606 (talk • contribs) 23:34, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Per lack of consensus and action over the last 2 years, have removed tag. LT910001 (talk) 07:23, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge into glucagon?
Talk:AIDS-related lymphoma

message: Added a needs attention flag. The into to this article is good, but the body if off topic and seems half wrong. I am knowledgeable enough to know it is bad, but not good enough at hematologic malignancy to fix it myself. -npatchett  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.41.162.216 (talk) 02:33, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Expert
Talk:Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma

message: This article might qualify under B-class standards, if it's sufficiently complete and well-sourced.  If you think it is, please leave a note at the end of WP:MEDA to request a more detailed review.  Thanks, WhatamIdoing (talk) 05:48, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Maybe B-class

message: i am curious about the "systemic" found in the first paragraph (maybe it was first sentence) of the article.  what is systemic? i am studying a patient with such a diagnosis.
thank you for your article and time  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.64.141.9 (talk) 17:29, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Simple Edit
Talk:Open back banjo

message: I think I got the wikifying and reference issues sorted out for this stub. It could use expanding. - LuckyLouie 00:46, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

message: Shouldn't this just be merged with banjo and this article made into a redirect? Just a suggestion. Scalhotrod (talk) 18:55, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: The bulk of this text is taken directly from the For Dummies webpage.  It needs to be changed so as not to steal directly.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.188.152.138 (talk) 23:18, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plaguarism
Talk:Bleeding diathesis

message: The following is an unsourced, poorly formatted textspew that was on this page before. If it can be sourced and cited, and ISN'T a copyvio, it's probably quite useful, but to be honest I can't be bothered dealing with it myself, so I leave it here for someone to clean up. --Lesath (talk) 06:41, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Textspew

message: doi:10.1111/bjh.13058 - excludes vWD and haemophilia A & B but covers everything else. JFW | T@lk 08:42, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  British guideline for rare coagulation disorders
Talk:1612 (film)

message: HI!!!!!! It is a gr8 movie. Where can I find subtitles in English?
Yes. What subtitles does this film have? English, German, Polish, Ukrainian ect. We should include this to the article. Also if this film does have English subtitles, please let me know as i want it ;) Ijanderson977 (talk) 00:42, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Great Movie, where are the subtitles

message: "The Other Russia" is a fringe, extremist group whose ranks include crypto-Nazis like Limonov. It is not to be treated as a serious source or reflective of public opinion in Russia. RZimmerwald (talk) 19:59, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Other Russia 

message: it is sometimes a fantasy storry, sometimes. If you counte the seconds, where fantasy elements dominate the storry, there will be more or less 5% of it. The maint point is about the independence war of russia against polen. watch the movie for see how much of it is fantasy. In main its a historical war movie. --93.184.26.78 (talk) 22:25, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  genre 
Talk:Acute erythroid leukemia

message: Must be skewed. What do the figures mean, eg for various quartiles or deciles ? - Rod57 (talk) 06:25, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prognosis ± sd (std dev) larger than mean itself 

message: had the causes section reverted, did not want to get into "edit war" whomever further edits please be advise article is missing causes section. thank you --Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 16:15, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  causes 

message: infection and gum bleeding are not symptoms. 70.51.83.211 (talk) 18:49, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  signs vs symptoms
Talk:Gerald Stone

message: Interesting to "compare and contrast" Gerald Stone's page at http://www.saxton.com.au/default.asp?sd8=3602 with this page as it is today (22 Jan 2008) on Wikipedia.
Mike Hamilton (talk) 17:06, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Saxton Speaker Bureau page

message: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8919433/60-Minutes-trailblazer-TV-legend-Gerald-Stone-dies-aged-87.html
That is saying had been battling cancer in more recent years. MikaelaArsenault (talk) 00:01, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cause of death 

message: I have a note that he was born on 18 August 1933, but I cannot confirm this online.  --  Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 06:23, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I see this has now found a source. --  Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 17:54, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Birth date
Talk:Follicular lymphoma

message: One or two of the external links listed at the end of this article don't seem to meet the standards one usually expects of Wikipedia articles.  The links contain information that is either a duplicate of information found elsewhere (I'm thinking of the "Lymphoma Information Network" page), or non-authoritative (the link to the page at lymphomation.org).
I'm not a regular Wikipedia editor, however, so I'm hesitant to make any changes.  I thought, however, that I would bring them to the attention of more regular editors.
I'm basing my assessment on what I have seen as far as standards required for external links at other, related, Wikipedia entries.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.247.154.34 (talk) 16:04, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I have deleted two of the three external links because the first one, "An integrative medicine approach" is alternative cures oriented and this person is regarded as a quack by the established medical community.  I deleted "Lymphoma Information Network" because it doesn't have anything not found in this Wikipedia article and is overflowing with ads.  I left the lymphomation.org link because it is a good resource for someone trying to learn about follicular lymphoma.TL36 (talk) 04:56, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Links 

message: Could/should this article mention or describe transformed follicular lymphoma ? As in A Study ... of GSK2816126 in Subjects With Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B Cell and Transformed Follicular Lymphoma. - Rod57 (talk) 11:16, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  transformed follicular lymphoma not mentioned 

message: The revised article now describes transformed follicular lymphoma. joflaher (talk) 13:26, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Now described 

message: doi:10.1111/bjh.16872 JFW | T@lk 10:03, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  UK guideline 

message: The text looks more like a chapter from a medical textbook than an encyclopedic article. 109.108.203.236 (talk) 15:16, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too advanced?
Talk:Hibernation induction trigger

message: Has anyone done a cDNA study on hibernating animals to see which proteins
are differentially expressed ?
Has anyone sequenced the gene(s) responsible for HIT ?  
Has anyone done a knockout, 
knockin or siRNA experiment on hibernators ?
Have the receptors for HIT been identified ?
Have the receptors for HIT been sequenced ?
Are these receptors present in non-hibernators ?
What happens if these receptors are expressed or upregulated in non-hibernators ?
Thanks!  Pls let me know if you know or find out!!!
               - Gerhard   ghol7955@gmp.usyd.edu.au
p.s. have they also done any differential fMRIs or PET scans on the brains of hibernating animals
(in comparison with when they are not hibernating) ?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.45.58.46 (talk) 16:21, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Questions re: HIT and cDNA, etc 

message: this is interesting, but not much of an article.  shouldn't it be a section within the larger hibernation page? I don't know how to suggest a merge.  I'll see if I can figure the merger out. --Paddling bear (talk) 17:53, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: own page
Talk:Breakthrough (1979 film)

message: Because the reason is Breakthrough is not 100% Canon to Sam Pickenpah's timeline according to critics so it needs to stay on here as proof the reason I am saying it is Stranksy was left for dead in the Cross of Iron at the end. where as Steiner goes missing in action so it's not possible for Stransky to have been saved or rescued as the movie does not make any sense. their is your proof. Trooper201 (talk) 23:23, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: This is purely your personal opinion. Regardless of such anomalies (although I don't recall Stransky being "left for dead" at the end of the first film), it clearly is a sequel, and the use of characters from the first was not in any way unauthorised. I am therefore reverting your unfounded claims. Nick Cooper (talk) 16:13, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Why I added unoffical sequel and not 100% Canon
Talk:Impedance cardiography

message: Not sure if anyone is watching here but I thought this was interesting. I just had an ICG and I mentioned to the doctor I hadn't heard of this test. He said it's new, it's only currently available at a few places such as (where I was) and at  Mayo Clinic, but will be rolling out elsewhere soon. I know this is unusable WP:OR but if anyone has WP:MEDRS info on this newer method it would be good to include it here. I know it's different than what is currently described in the article because electrodes were only placed on my wrists, not on diaphragm or neck. SemanticMantis (talk) 18:01, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: New type of ICG
Talk:Leukapheresis

message: There is a separate page for Leukocyte apheresis which may be the same topic. Chimeric antigen receptor T cell points to that page but the topic is not mentioned there.
If Leukocyte apheresis is the same as Leukapheresis can an experienced editor transfer anything of use and then arrange deletion of the other page.
Thanks JDE94.126.214.18 (talk) 22:24, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leukocyte apheresis
Talk:Cut (2000 film)

message: The link to the Italian page leads to the equivalent of cut (filmmaking). Strangely, cut (filmmaking) leads to that Italian page, but the Italian one leads to here. I don't know how to change this. Emaskask (talk) 05:34, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This seems to be the result of bot editing. I removed the link to the Italian page, since there seems to be no Italian article about the movie. I'm afraid, that this is not a permanent solution, since bots may re-create the links again. --White rotten rabbit (talk) 12:22, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Microcytic anemia

message: doi:10.1111/bjh.12081 JFW | T@lk 16:20, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Atypical forms 

message: doi:10.1136/bmj.f3154
doi:10.1056/NEJMra1215361
doi:10.1182/blood-2013-10-512624
Some key sources over the last year or so. JFW | T@lk 14:48, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  BMJ & NEJM & Blood 

message: I reformatted the page slightly adding a more descriptive section under causes on rare microcytic anemias and added detailed sections on IDA, ACD, and thalassemia. I also added an evaluation and diagnosis section and added information on lab markers. Alyssamarino99 (talk) 21:11, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updates to page
Talk:Sparrows (1926 film)

message: This article is a mess; it appears to be missing a bunch of text, with sections picking up in midstream. For example, the plot summary opens with "Most of the children are orphans. One mother sends her child a doll, but Grimes crushes its head and tosses it into the swamp." What children? Where are they? Who is this Grimes? The reader is given no explanation. Later, the Production section starts with "However, Hal Mohr, the film's director of photography, debunked this story...." What story? Not a word in the article, although the rest of the sentence seems to indicate it had something to do with alligators. I have no idea how to fix the article, having come here simply to learn about the film, but I hope someone who knows more can take it in hand. Drhoehl (talk) 23:17, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: That was all due to sloppy deletions arising from copyright violations. Some of the deletions were justified (e.g. verbatim text from IMDb trivia), but a lot wasn't. I have dealt with it. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:15, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Talk:Myeloproliferative neoplasm

message: - historical review. JFW | T@lk 21:54, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: The blanket statement about "not being a cancer" for such a diverse group of clonal neoplasms that includes several conditions with the name "leukemia" seems at the very least confusing. There are other clonal conditions some with adverse prognoses that are probably in the same category (think MGUS proceeding variously to Waldenstroms or indolent forms of multiple myeloma ). It might be more helpful to clarify that the leukemias can be slowly progressing or rapidly progressing and that clonal diseases are part of a spectrum and may interconvert.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:9:D80:47F:B5C8:E4EC:FAAB:7114 (talk) 21:41, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Not a Cancer"? 

message: Though not curable, there are treatments, for example phlebotomy and hydroxyurea. Needs updating to inlcude this? Kognos (talk) 17:00, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Treatment 

message: The following was added:
The paper in question (doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1311347) is a primary source, and I am in no doubt that its findings will eventually find their way into secondary sources, particularly if they can be replicated. Until then, perhaps we shouldn't feel compelled to mention this. JFW | T@lk 23:21, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  CALR mutations 

message: Two suggestions:
It is pointed out that the new and proper term is MPN not MPD, yet MDP used throughout the article.  Time to switch?
I think the title of this article should be plural: Myeloproliferative neoplasms.  Note that every time the term is used in the article, it is used in the plural.
The only time it is used in the singular is like in a sentence "polycythemia vera is a myeloproliferative neoplasm" but even then it is more customary to say "polycythemia vera is one of the myeloproliferative neoplasms". Consider title change?
IiKkEe (talk) 21:05, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  title and abbreviation 

message: doi:10.1182/blood-2014-10-607341 JFW | T@lk 10:45, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Response criteria consensus 

message: Although not a malignant neoplasm like other cancers,<ilstilDIEFROMit!..81.11.206.29 (talk) 16:24, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  ohys?? 

message: All MPNs arise from precursors of the myeloid lineages in the bone marrow.<pmf.candoLYMFOBLASTCRISIS(stemcelthathigh!81.11.206.29 (talk) 16:54, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  nope 

message: doi:10.1111/bjh.14713 JFW | T@lk 08:28, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Familial forms 

message: doi:10.1182/blood-2017-06-782037 JFW | T@lk 20:58, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review in Blood
Talk:P1PK blood group system

message: In respect of the current confusion of the P antigen and the P blood group system with the last changes of chromosome numbers see Talk:Human_blood_group_systems#Last_changes_in_P_and_GLOB_system. --Firefly's luciferase (talk) 16:57, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Additional comment: This article will need some additional work later. The referenced NEJM article is still referring to the P antigen system (symbol P1, number 003; Chromosome 22) before GLOB (028; Chromosome 3 with antigen P) was defined and the collection GLOB (209; Chromosome 22; including antigen Pk) were defined. It's a little bit confusing. Since classifications may change in the next future again because of recently reported scientific results; I will not change the article at the moment but return to it then again. Please feel free to update it as well. --Firefly's luciferase (talk) 18:55, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

text: See also the additional comment on Talk:Human_blood_group_systems#Last_changes_in_P_and_GLOB_system. --Firefly's luciferase (talk) 02:49, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion of P antigen and P blood group system
Talk:Phlebothrombosis

message: We had an IP say "Phlebothrombosis is a thrombus in a vein without primary inflammation. This differs from Thrombophlebitis, which is the inflammation of a vein with blood clot formation inside the vein at the site of the inflammation." Biosthmors (talk) 04:01, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accuracy
Talk:Polycystic liver disease

message: I am quite concerned about this article.it has not been edited since September 26 this year,has a pathophysiology section that is empty and marked only with an expend template,no section as to symptoms,treatment,or prognosis,and is to short to educate readers as to the condition.unless massive expansion can be done soon,i feel it will need to be merged into polycystic kidney disease.169.244.148.235 (talk) 20:44, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge into polycystic kidney disease. 

message: Sources online and used in this article referred to this condition with the acronym PCLD. The page has always referred to it as PLD so I didn't change it - but just putting it out there that a change might be needed. SEMMENDINGER (talk) 18:32, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  PLD or PCLD
Talk:Reticulocyte production index

message: The Calculation and Interpretation sections are wrong and inconsistent. See the Wrong formula comment. GrantZ (talk) 15:27, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I have fixed the ambiguity which arose from naming the corrected reticulocyte percentage "Retic Index". The Calculation and Interpretation sections should be correct now. GrantZ (talk) 16:48, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disputed 

message: The first formula given here for corrected retic count is wrong. It should not be divided by 2. (See Ref 1) (See Ref 2)—— Saurabh P. (talk) 06:46, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The interpretation section seems to be inconsistent with the calculation. It only mentions RI while the calculation above determines the RPI. The 0.5% to 2.5% range also seems dubious. GrantZ (talk) 15:20, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong formula
Talk:Richter's transformation

message: Some history might clarify why these (and only these) transformations are given this name ? - Rod57 (talk) 23:10, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why are these grouped under one name 

message: Nivolumab + Ibrutinib Active in Relapsed/Refractory CLL and Richter Transformation may be worthy of mention ? - Rod57 (talk) 23:12, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  checkpoint inhibition shows promise
Talk:Rouleaux

message: Would a  hatnote be out of place here? The Straight Dope incorrectly uses this term for the geometric shape. -- Jokes Free4Me (talk) 13:29, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  common typo? 

message: should list the known causes  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.85.0.250 (talk) 16:34, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  list known causes 

message: There are currently very few open-licenced optical images of red blood cells, other than slide smears which encourage misconceptions about how tightly packed RBCs are.  Witness this article currently not having any.  Nor Red blood cell.  So I note that https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9va0KPrVExs has a CC BY license, and nice images of RBCs.  And rouleaux.  Some frames captures could make a nice addition to http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Red_blood_cells , and to this article. Fyi. 71.192.162.194 (talk) 05:26, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opportunity for optical microscope images of red blood cells 

message: What is this word in the image caption meant to mean? "Highlightsr" looks like a typo to me, but the obvious correction -- "highlights" -- seems meaningless in context. Autocorrect error? Liam Proven (talk) 10:21, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typo? "Highlightsr"
Talk:Sézary disease

message: Citation [4] leads to a broken link/unregistered domain--could also stand for a more recent reference ("no known causes of Sezary's") as this one is from 2008 anyway
--Actually, many of the references cite sezary.com, which is no longer a registered domain.
Chengjason7 (talk) 05:21, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken references 

message: Unsure if I'm reading this wrong (little knowledge of the subject), but the abstract of the cited article [11] for the first sentence of "Treatment" along with the linked articles for Vorinostat and Romidepsin don't seem to indicate that the two drugs are second-line--in fact, the article's abstract seems to indicate that HDAC inhibitors/HDI are first-line, with chemo etc being second options.Chengjason7 (talk) 05:26, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Treatment section? 

message: lots of sentences here are direct quotes from the references they cite, with [2] being the main source--this includes the first sentence of the Epidemiology section, which is also about MF and not totally relevant to the epidemiology of Sezary. Removed that sentenceChengjason7 (talk) 05:30, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  rewording direct quotations from citations