Talk:Combat 18

message: As I see it, Combat 18 and Racial Volunteer Force are separate, though closely related articles. Therefore, there is no reason for merging. Quoting from Merging information page, Rationale section:
I would like to close the merging discussion, but User 94.14.58.87 has not contributed since November 16, 2011, so I don't know if he/she will ever have a chance to comment on this... 
Sapere aude22 (talk) 16:10, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please don't merge 

message: An RfC: Which descriptor, if any, can be added in front of Southern Poverty Law Center when referenced in other articles? has been posted at the Southern Poverty Law Center talk page. Your participation is welcomed. – MrX 16:37, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfC 

message: It says a little ways into the article that he "split decisively with the BNP...". I've looked all though the article and I don't find anything that might give me a hint as to what "BNP" means. Is that just something that everyone is supposed to know automatically? Is it "British Native Party"? "British National Party"? "Bashing Negros Party"? "British National Petroleum"? I have no idea. I find by googling that there is indeed such a thing as the "British National Party", and so I'm going to guess that that's what it means, but somehow it doesn't seem like I ought to have to rely on Google to understand the contents of a Wikipedia page..45Colt 21:07, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  BNP? Plastering tools?

message: Deletion of Illustration on all combat 18 articles in different languages, advice to the claim of any ideological attack, this will be directed on all social media if needed, the issue will be disputed in court, or any measure needed to revert this misunderstanding on the same perpetual legal grounds that this construct of ideological attacks are based, per country, Norway, Netherlands, United States, France.
(fyi the logo of the Rote Armee Fraction was not deleted, indication of selective vandalism.
To the editor (?) that asked for uploading the original images, I will do so before 28th of march 2017.
Aan JCB, dhr J. Bos
De illustratie die bij dit artikel hoort, Combat 18, is copyright, zonder toestemming van ontwerper (EJ Vening) is de illustratie verwijderd- verwijt ideologische vandalisme - juridische grondslag mist, extern beoordeeld. EJVening eist correctie met terugwerkende kracht. Wilt dhr J. Bos contact met mijn advocaat in Nederland, of de oprichter van Wikipedia een schrijven van mijn advocaat in Frankrijk, ik verwijt selectieve ideologische vandalisme, evident opgezet om fracties te verstoren. Alle illustraties Combat 18 RVF zijn eigendom van onafhankelijke participant.
March 26-2017
Please avoid any misunderstanding about this issue, obvious deletion is a selective ideological attack and copyright nfringement. The claim about copyright violation is false, which I can prove. I claim copyright of all (4) illustrations related to the article. JCB is in violation with national law in the Netherlands, however, I do not only dispute the deletion in the Netherlands, I delegate the issue on all social media, if JCB decides to negate this vandalism which is a construct of hosting iomags that are ruled out on ideological grounds, moreover, selective ideological ,
This is unjustified, indirect vandalism, which I take personally for the claim of copyright infringement, I do not advocate any ideology per se.
If my claim is proved true, that the construct of this ideological attack is true, external picture databases that not only claim copyright on copyrighted illustrations but also "validate" images, without any proof, missing any juridical correspondence where or when these images were disputed in court.
JCB for Mr. Johan Bos, please elaborate on which grounds your (wikipedia external hosts) hold these images, if you want.
Signed,
EJVening.
The Combat 18 fraction logo. 
"Here be dragons" , a White dragon. This is for RVF readers that understand the obvious mistake about this illustration, is known.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rijndaal (talk • contribs) 12:44, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: You can claim copyright all you want, that's all the more reason why we can't use it.  If you are the copyright holder, then you have a conflict of interest with this article's subject and should not be editing it.  Wikipedia does not tolerate legal threats.  Ian.thomson (talk) 12:53, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

text: Could you try to be clearer?  In attempting to sound formal and haughty, you've come across as very unclear.  Ian.thomson (talk) 13:16, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright claim 

message: Is there a reason why "Charlie Sargent" redirects to Combat 18?
Was there a (presumably poorly written) WP about him previously?
and then what- why was it redirected ?
Does anyone know?--Wuerzele (talk) 21:07, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  why does "Charlie Sargent" redirect here 

message: Perhaps the exposure of these villains will illustrate the continuing danger.  James Healy, 40, from Portsmouth, had extensive Combat 18 "memorabilia" and other evidence of involvement.  Liam Tracey, 35, from Camden, London, and Charlie Ambrose, 31, from Brighton, were also sentenced for their part in the assault.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/jul/24/chelsea-fan-jailed-for-attack-on-guardian-journalist-owen-jones?fbclid=IwAR27z_3wcDl3a2Fjm1suS2VbRkNb3cIwpYVGBtWtuJOpKq_3OeIAuLqr0dQ
2.31.162.38 (talk) 07:17, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, according to the report, he had one badge and a card with a C18 slogan, among other slogans. Neither confirm him as a C18 member, and the article does not say he is either. You might as well damn all Chelsea supporters on the same basis. Emeraude (talk) 07:30, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assault on Owen Jones and subsequent sentencing of Combat 18-related attackera