lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Victor (male name)

message: : Obviously, this is only the very beginning of an article. Hence the  tag. With Wikipedia's long list of common names, the precedent is set for such pages (I was actually surprised one didn't exist for a name reasonably common across cultures - Hispanic, Russian, English, American, etc.). Feel free to and certainly please expand! VigilancePrime (talk) 02:53, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Base Page
Talk:Gregory C. Carr

message: Gregory was a Mormon missionary in Japan for two years. The article should mention it. I will if someone don´t have more data.--Wcris (talk) 19:47, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mormon 

message: An RfC: Which descriptor, if any, can be added in front of Southern Poverty Law Center when referenced in other articles? has been posted at the Southern Poverty Law Center talk page. Your participation is welcomed. – MrX 16:44, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfC
Talk:Redbreast (whiskey)

message: Both of these articles refer to the same drink.  They should be merged. Neelix 
(talk) 12:36, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. They should be merged. jcmiller1215 21:27, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes I agree. Redbreast is the best whiskey in the World and should not be confused; like its drinkers.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.0.68.128 (talk) 23:21, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a fairly obvious need.  Unless someone objects I will merge the two. Sláinte! Hammersbach (talk) 18:09, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Redbreast whiskey]] 

message: Aren't all Scottish single malts "pure pot still" as well? PizzaMan (talk) 07:32, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  pot still 

message: When I was young, Redbreast was with Gilbeys Gilbeys of Ireland.  Gilbeys bought the raw spirit from Jamesons, Jameson Irish Whiskey, this was before the Irish Distillers merger.  Gilbeys distilled it again, stored in in sherry casks, and aged it for 10 or 12 years.  It was lovely.  After the merger, Jameson ceased supplying, so some years later, it vanished.  I assure you that the redbreast of today is not the same as the Redbreast sold by Gilbeys.  This isn't ever OR, its memory, there must be references somewhere.  The article should mention this Lugnad (talk) 02:55, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Gilbeys
Talk:2008 British Touring Car Championship

message: At least until the official entry list is announced, team's should be refered to by their name, rather than their sponsor branding. i.e., Triple Eight instead of VX Racing, Team Dynamics instead of Team Halfords, etc.... Once the official entry list, detailing the registered team names is released, the list can be updated according, but until then it is best practice to continue to refer to teams by their name. 
Jonathan McLeod (talk) 02:58, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  BTCC Team's names 

message: I've removed the section that said it was "non-factual and is based on rumour and speculation". Any info added to the page should be supported by a reliable source, and not just based on hearsay and idle forum banter... Heycos (talk) 17:05, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rumours/speculation 

message: Does the sub-heading "A number of teams and drivers have expressed interest in competing, although there is no guarantee that all plans will come to fruition." actually say any more than 'possible' followed by a list of rumours/speculation?--MartinUK (talk) 12:07, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible
Talk:Theatre of the Ridiculous

message: The article has a section that is specifically devoted to disputing the accuracy of the rest of the article. This needs to be resolved. Otto4711 (talk) 03:05, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Factual dispute

message: I've tried doing a total re-write, using a different focus: this page is now about the theatrical genre, and it talks about the "Play-House" company as founding the genre, but also goes into the "Ridiculous Theatrical" group.
There is much more that can be said, of course... 
I've yet to mention Jack Smith or Tony Ingrassia, there's very little about Jackie Curtis, and so on.... -- Doom (talk) 10:29, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New rewrite 

message: Is there any real Academic Source- other than what appears to be a quote from Lou Reed given at a concert- that Theatre of the Ridiculous influenced the Rocky Horror following?  That seems just a little fart-fetched, I could understand Theatre of the Ridiculous being an influence on Glitter Rock itself, along with Punk and the Club Culture of the 80's and 90's, but it's hard to believe the kids who do Rocky Horror had any knowledge of Theatre of the Ridiculoous.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.63.207.100 (talk) 06:08, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rocky Horror? 

message: This article attributes the idea of the "Theatre of the Absurd" to Antonin Artaud. Artaud actually wrote "Theatre of Cruelty," which Charles Ludlam DOES mention as an inspiration (along with Bertolt Brecht's ideas about epic acting). Martin Esslin coined the term "Theatre of the Absurd" in his book of the same name.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Walt828 (talk • contribs) 13:46, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Good catch - I've altered the article accordingly.  BMK (talk) 13:56, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Theatre of the Absurd 
Talk:Maria Wilhelmine von Thun und Hohenstein

message: Hello, I'm very glad to see this article being provided with reference sources.  But I suspect most Wikipedia readers would not know what the abbreviations A-Wstm and As mean (I don't, and Google is no avail).  Could they please be spelled out on first appearance?  Thanks, Opus33 (talk) 16:45, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Most Wikipedia readers also don't know that references without page numbers are worthless, because they open the door to total arbitrariness.  Keefe's article (like most of his others) is fraught with mistakes, Braunbehrens is unreliable and most of the occurrences you describe are directly verifiable anyway either by the Köchel catalogue or Mozart's letters - which you seem never to have read in their entirety. And try to get acquainted with the sigla of RISM.--Suessmayr (talk) 06:31, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This reply indicates zero interest in the goal of helping WP readers. Opus33 (talk) 16:14, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The Thun article in Clive's book is based on two flawed articles by Preihs (1943) and Orel (1954) that contain countless wrong biographical dates merely copied from Wurzbach. That's what you consider "helping WP readers" ;).--Suessmayr (talk) 17:01, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Abbreviations

message: How did you identify Maria Wilhelmine on Lesseur's painting? What about two other ladies? A.J. (talk) 09:16, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point.  It seems possible that the picture portrays the Countess's three daughters, and not her at all.  Pending further information (which seems to be hard to find), I'm taking it down.  Opus33 (talk) 21:03, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The painting 

message: Some of the biographical dates are not in accordance with GeneAll.net . Furthermore the primary sources (baptismal registers) in this article violate the Wikipedia rules of sourcing.--62.47.130.119 (talk) 07:02, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: You're absolutely right. So let's dismiss the correct dates based on the primary sources and replace them with the flawed information in the crappy secondary literature!--62.47.131.96 (talk) 08:28, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates 

message: It was with the Count and Countess that Mozart stayed on his return from Salzburg to Vienna, which occasioned the Symphony in C, no, 36' the 'Linz' Symphony. No mention in this article.-Wetman (talk) 15:51, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm ...  Take a look here. Heartz says that Mozart stayed at the home of the Count Thun who was Maria Wilhelmine's father-in-law; not clear that she herself was present.  Opus33 (talk) 16:30, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mozart's 'Linz' SymPhony
Talk:Philippe Courtot

message: I don't comment to disparage Philippe personally, but the fact is that this paragraph:
=======
After selling cc:Mail, Courtot was later named president and CEO of Verity in 1993, an intellectual capital management and software company. He led the company to its initial public offering in 1995 and then stepped down from his positions at Verity in 1997.
=======
contains a blatant error.  He did not step down from Verity in 1997.  Rather, the BoD fired him and brought in a turnaround consulting firm to run the company. 47.186.115.214 (talk) 04:05, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect professional history in this article 

message: contains a blatant error.  He did not step down from Verity in 1997.  Rather, the BoD fired him and brought in a turnaround consulting firm to run the company. 47.186.115.214 (talk) 04:05, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: =
Talk:Anna Currence

message: I put this discussion topic at Talk:Barnes & Noble because it was more likely to get traffic there.  Input is appreciated.  --BizMgr (talk) 18:03, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Anna Currence and the Supestore Design
Talk:Robert A. Daly

message: According to Carole Bayer Sager's memoir, They're Playing Our Song, she is Daly's second wife.  He is divorced from his first wife, Nancy, whose full name I don't know but who is the mother of the three grown children mentioned in the article. This aspect of the article needs fleshing out. JamesMLane t c 18:37, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Family information
Talk:River Rye (Ireland)

message: This is the Rye Water, or sometimes the Rye Water or Ryewater River.  It is never the Rye River, or River Rye!  Could someone name the article properly?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.141.96.183 (talk) 08:17, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name - Rye Water
Talk:William Danoff

message: Highly subjective content here. Should be rewritten to reduce the appearance of being a puff piece.199.20.44.50 (talk) 17:31, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it is nothing but puff. His family meanwhile, is victimised by his brutal violent abuse of his children. His wife had to raise their children with a stockpile of guns. Fidelity produced the ultimate puff when they showed how he hides behind baby pictures in his office with the TV ad “letters”. 2605:59C8:512E:DF10:D93C:4158:B10D:6457 (talk) 15:56, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
Talk:David Hendricks

message: The "trial" section was full of a lot of comments that were not cited and pure speculation.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.215.126.6 (talk) 04:02, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Trial section

message: Does anyone know what became of Hendricks after his acquittal? Jeanie821 16:46, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Where he is now

message: I can't believe what I just read. Could it be that David Hendricks himself wrote most of the ludicrous claims in the article? History.com is a reliable source and cites exactly why he was convicted; it's located here. MagnoliaSouth (talk) 23:03, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Worst article I've ever come across.
Talk:Robert Hamilton (Irish footballer)

message: I've reverted his date of birth to 1907, as per Terry Frost (IBSN 0-907969-38-0) . However, I concede it's not always correct. The link provided does not meet WP:RS but it may be that it is correct. Another source may need to be found. Peanut4 (talk) 21:02, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: My Grandfather Sammy Hamilton, who was Uncle Bobby's younger brother was born 1924, so I think 1907 is more likely than 1903, we dont think that there was a 21 year gap between them. Also Newry Town reference Uncle Bobby being 20 in 1927 when he was selected to play for The Irish League Representative Team at Windsor Park. 2A00:23C6:1AE1:701:2003:7B5F:C5F:4B55 (talk) 12:05, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of birth
Talk:Don Post

message: There's an incredible source of Don Post Studios info here: http://halloweenmonstermasks.com/catalog/index.html, but all the links point to Blogger/Blogspot links, which are forbidden as references. Not sure what to do here. StevePrutz (talk) 14:54, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Monster Mask Catalog Archive (Blogger links)
Talk:Asher Edelman

message: In case some might be used as future refs: --Ronz (talk) 16:26, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved from External links section

message: This section doesn't make sense. If anything his categories should be expanded but this current set doesn't serve what this section is normally for.--CharlesDeMint (talk) 19:52, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed section. Xanthomelanoussprog (talk) 10:20, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  See also 
Template talk:Geologic time scale

message: I think we should try to synchronize this large time scale template with the periods contained in the footer templates, such as :Template:Carboniferous Footer... RingtailedFox • Talk • Contribs 03:27, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Synchronization 

message: There have been some rather sweeping changes since before January 18. The accuracy of this template seems have been compromised with it. ~ UBeR (talk) 03:45, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New setup 

message: There is a mess-up on the chart in the Early Cambrian section. The early is located in the Supereon when it shouldn't be there. I am not even going to attempt fixing it beacause I am not good at the table making stuff. Can someone fix this?
The Danian is messed up too. Andrew Colvin | Talk 05:59, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed! Thanks~ Andrew Colvin | Talk 03:06, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early Cambrian 

message: According to these two sources, we need a few changes to the table. However, I am not sure why or what the difference is between USGS and GSA?
*http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2007/3015/fs2007-3015.pdf
*http://www.geosociety.org/science/timescale/timescl.pdf
A. Z. Colvin • Talk 03:34, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update? 

message: Why did they seperate the Carboniferous period into two???
put comment here:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Talker26 (talk) 15:12, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Because it is essentially two parts. According to the Geological Society of America and the United States Geological Survey, the carboniferous is a period broken into two parts (epochs) instead of three epochs (early, middle, and late). These ones just happened to be named. The GSA interprets it as being “part” of the period while the USGS considers it as a separate epoch. Either way, the results are the same. For simplicity, the diagram separates it instead of writing that it has two parts. Hope that helps! A. Z. Colvin • Talk 05:01, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Carboniferous]] 

message: The template says:
:Following the Little Ice Age, Atmospheric CO2 levels, primarily as a result of reduced oceanic CO2 solubility where the ocean has turned from a CO2 sink to a CO2 source with the increasing temperature, rise from around 280 parts per million volume (ppmv) to the current level of 390 ppmv.
With a reference to various wikipedia pages, including Carbon dioxide in Earth's atmosphere
The claim that the increse in CO2 after the little ice age is due to the oceans changing from a sink to a source does not appear to be supported by the references. HughesJohn (talk) 11:35, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, the unsupported claims were made by Special:Contributions/80.202.36.91 on 26 May 2013‎.  These changes are the only ones from that address.  I've removed them. HughesJohn (talk) 13:26, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Holocene
Talk:J. Christopher Flowers

message: Hello Justlettersandnumbers, I see that you have removed a lot of well-sourced content, rather than editing it so that it meets your standards.  There is limited information on J. Christopher Flowers, so there aren't better sources than the ones available.  I have only included facts in the content, and have sorted through dozens of articles that were primarily opinions or used descriptive adjectives rather than sticking to stating the facts.  It would be nice to get the content up since it took time to get up there.  If it is not to your liking for some reason that you are unable to quantify in a way that authors can adjust to, please remove or edit content that bothers you, rather than delete nearly the entire page.  
College313131 (talk) 18:23, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Talk:Frederick L. A. Grauer

message: Per these searches:
*
*
there is no indication of encyclopedic notability of the subject. See
* http://www.nytimes.com/1987/11/19/business/big-investors-defend-programmed-trading.html passing mention only 
* http://www.forbes.com/forbes/2008/0107/044.html passing mention only
* http://www.nytimes.com/1995/04/13/business/company-news-possible-sale-of-wells-fargo-nikko-is-seen.html quote only
* http://www.nytimes.com/1987/11/19/business/big-investors-defend-programmed-trading.html quotes only
* http://www.pionline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080428/PRINTSUB/451896895/1010 discussed as possible candidate for a job he ultimately did not get/take
* http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=agHGQ249p.98&refer=news passing mentions only
* http://www.nytimes.com/1989/12/22/business/panel-named-by-nyse.html named in a list
* http://www.nytimes.com/1989/06/28/business/wells-fargo-and-nikko-set-advisory-venture.html minor quotes
The only potential indicator of notability I found is
* http://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jfinec/v3y1976i3p233-256.html widely cited paper 
but this is co-written with a very prolific and well-cited author (Bob Litzenberger—a surprising redlink I may fix myself).
Bongomatic 01:49, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Gen Fukunaga

message: Is this part about his uncle even true? Sources would be epic for this article. Sense it has no sources, none of this can be taking as true. The part about his Uncle and Toei realy need soucres. Last I heard that was only a rumor, and never really proven. - 69.244.100.206 (talk) 03:00, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fukunaga's Uncle 
Talk:M.E.S. Indian School

message: Hi I am an ex student of MES and decided to create a page on MES. Please feel free to add any facts about the school that you are aware of and edit any relevant information.
Qsibtain (talk) 03:39, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Article creation

message: Deleted the Pakistani Prime Minister reference, please provide a link.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.211.6.3 (talk) 17:44, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Pakistani Prime Minister

message: As with most copyvios -- where the article has zero refs, and copies a school website -- one must run the dupe detector on a number of pages at the school website to see the scope of the copyvio.--Epeefleche (talk) 22:45, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scope of copyvio
Talk:Class collaboration

message: A clear distinction should be made between the more classical fascists like Mussolini who accepted inequality as a natural result of human civilization, and more radicals like the German National Socialists who made it clear that they wanted to destroy the old class system entirely via 'socializing' individuals in a totalitarian state. Hitler's obcession with the German youth was quite particular in this regard, he thought that children who have yet to enter the workforce and thus be lumped in as a class are 'pure', the Nazi's thought they could remove class at an early age through military conscription and nationalist propaganda.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.177.31.89 (talk) 05:10, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  untitled 

message: Communism also has it (collaboration between the communist and proletariat classes) and so does capitalism (it allows people of different classes to work together).
Social-democracy supports class collaboration, while communism opposes it.
So I propose that first the article describe collaboration as a general idea, and then move on into the forms it had under fascism, communism, and capitalism.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.255.251.8 (talk) 15:30, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Communist ideology is about abolishing classes, and capitalist ideology reject the idea that society is organized around classes. Fascist ideology, however, affirms that there are classes, and that they should work together for the good of the Nation. 82.66.175.16 (talk) 17:03, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Class collaboration specific to fascism?? 

message: Class collaboration does not mean support of hierarchy of classes - a very right-wing idea. Social democracy - a left-wing movement - supports class collaboration as a means to reduce class division and hierarchy all together and promote universal equality to people regardless of existing class position.--R-41 (talk) 02:44, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Class collaboration does not always mean support of the right-wing idea of hierarchy of classes. Social democracy supports class collaboration and it is left-wing.
Portal talk:Spaceflight/Selected article

message: At what point, if ever, would it make sense to move the remainder of the 2006 references to the  archive? Now? (sdsds - talk) 03:58, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. I've moved 2007 as well. --GW_SimulationsUser Page | Talk 10:34, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archiving 2006 

message: Is it just obvious that since the portal also has a "Selected biography" that it would be better for selected articles to be non-biographic? More generally, it would be nice to have a brief description of what qualities we're looking for in selected article nominations! (sdsds - talk) 04:05, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bios
Talk:Gama Bomb

message: 22/02/21 - updated history, added minor corrections  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joebomb1 (talk • contribs) 15:53, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Talk:HMCS Integrity (1804)

message: Winfield does not list her in his book covering the Royal Navy between 1793 and 1817, suggesting that she was never commissioned, at least not as far as the Admiralty knew. However, it was not uncommon for local commanders on distant stations to commission vessels without informing the Admiralty. Colledge does mention her, and he states that she was still listed as late as 1810; apparently he was unaware of her loss. The National Maritime Museum in Greenwich lists her as beeing bought or built in 1805, and gives the name of her master in 1806 as A. Bloodsworth. In any case, she was not the only HMS Integrity. Acad Ronin (talk) 21:44, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree she was not formally commissioned - Lyon's "Sailing Navy List" specifically states she was an unregistered vessel. No great surprise given her small size and the remoteness of New South Wales. I've noted her status as an unregistered RN vessel in the article, but as discussed in more detail at WT:SHIPS I think a more accurate article name is HMCS Integrity (1804 ship). The primary sources (essentially Governor King's various items of correspondence) all refer to her as "HM Colonial Cutter" rather than just "HM Cutter" and as an unregistered craft she was never formally recorded as an HMS. -- Euryalus (talk) 13:06, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Further, having now expanded the article to include each voyage it's clear that she only had two masters (Houstoun and Robbins) and sank in 1805, so the vessel commanded by A. Bloodsworth in 1806 must be another ship. -- Euryalus (talk) 13:20, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: HMS or not?