lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Let the Beat Control Your Body

message: The said link is broken and points to a domain-parking service which does not provide the actual content/information. I have searched on web.archive.org for a working version and found this: https://web.archive.org/web/20110714122224/http://mp3skyline.com/rid-0x3eb6c-chaah_-_funkiness-of-you--groove-gangstas-mix--mp3-download.html
Please update this, my guest edit is being disallowed as "disruptive". --88.76.190.234 (talk) 03:18, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  External link to mp3skyline.com broken due to "sedo-parking" 
Talk:Let the Music Play (Shannon song)

message: Beatbox ft. Rael - Let The Music Play... pretty known and one of my favorite beat mixes.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Em27 (talk • contribs) 06:41, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  one more cover 

message: Maybe it's just me, but does anyone else hear hints of Madonna's "Into the Groove" in this song? Specifically, the beat, and the 5 notes that get repeated throughout the song(right before Madonna says "I'm waiting")? 202.156.14.103 (talk) 16:06, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This song was first, so it should be said the other way around.—Iknow23 (talk) 01:02, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Similarities 

message: Maybe this article could be re-written by someone who's not totally in love with Shannon. Just a suggestion. 84.198.246.199 (talk) 02:12, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  P.O.V. 

message: In a 2008 interview in Webster Hall, NYC with whom I believe is Rap Entertainment, Shannon talks more about the history of the song, specifically that the lyrics may have been written by a Ms Anne Godwin as a rap song, and Barbosa introduced it to her after her death. 
https://www.youtube. com/watch?v=Xs_VXtU2hJ0
Is there any further verification for this?
108.6.212.22 (talk) 06:37, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional background information 
Talk:Let U Go (ATB song)

message: Please note : There is a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Songs/coverversions with the purpose of trying to establish a standard rule for merge/separate different versions of the same song. Please make known your opinions on the matter.--Richhoncho (talk) 19:47, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge
Talk:Karl E. Weick

message: Plagiarism is not the same thing as a copy write violation. Further, simply insulting Weick for "shotty work" is an asinine insult over a trivial matter. In comparison to the major influence Weick has had on scholarship, devoting this much of his page to this kind of meaningless nay-saying is a waste of everyone's time and disingenuous at best. I'm going to move it be deleted as non-notable, particularly given the guidelines for biographies of living persons, unless there's some further discussion to be had over the matter.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.123.198.163 (talk) 02:25, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok 97.119.170.123 (talk) 18:48, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  I don´t mind the deletion. The tone of the request, however, is an insult to people like Thomas Basbøll and Henrik Graham, who researched the matter. Who ecactly calls these researchers asinie? How exactly is (s)he able to judge? As far as I could follow the matter, Karl was perfectly able to reply without insults. Yotwen (talk) 12:58, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagiarism Deletion 

message: I have added a lot of new material. At what point does this article cease to be a stub?--RichardVeryard 02:22, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stub 

message: I have an out-of-date link to a paper called "A comparison of the works of Karl Weick and Sir Geoffrey Vickers", by Errol Smythe. Can anyone provide an up-to-date link?--RichardVeryard 02:22, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request 

message: was introduced into management theory by James G. March. Weick explores the topic, no less, but no more, either. Yotwen (talk) 16:02, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Loose Coupling 

message: Hello.  I agree that March suggested the role of coupling but he is not the scholar who developed the concept.  Do you agree?  I'd argue that Charles Perrow was the scholar who actually constructed the concept in the 70's and 80's.  We can both agree that Weick was not responsible for the concept, however.  Getting back to March (and Simon for that matter), if we gave them credit for inventing every thought they wrote, then all of the organizational science literature could be credited to them.  It's good to be them!  P.A.P. (talk) 03:10, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry - being slow picking up the thread... As far as I know, March introduced the concept in organizational theory. I don't claim he invented it. Anyway, Dick Cyert would also be a good one, Derek Pugh and the Aston Group... No, they surely did not invent everything they cite in their works. Don't we all stand on the shoulders of giants? Yotwen (talk) 13:49, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coupling 

message: I removed this citation from the "Plagiarism" section:
:
You'll see that Gelman's post relies on this very Wikipedia article, and so citing him can't substantiate the claims made here. Gdr 15:59, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citogenesis
Talk:Tsingy de Bemaraha Strict Nature Reserve

message: This page should perhaps be split in two since the Strict Nature Reserve has been divided into a strict reserve and a national park.  For now I have kept the Strict Nature Reserve title as this is how it is still listed by UNESCO.Masindrano 10:52, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Katherine Karađorđević

message: Her courtesy (and only courtesy, i.e. of no legal standing) title is princess Katherine, not "crown princess". Check Alexander Karageorgevitch (the claimant to the throne of long defunct Yugoslavia)'s web page.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.41.252.230 (talk) 09:50, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: , your move of the article from Katherine, Crown Princess of Yugoslavia to Katherine Karađorđević looks wrong, because it appears that we normally use courtesy titles for deposed royalty and their families, and because royalty are not normally known by their surname. Most of the sources cited in the article are from royalfamily.org, which refer to her as 'Crown Princess Katherine', but I am unsure whether this is an independant reliable source.  If 'Crown Princess' is not her courtesy title then I suggest either Princess Katherine of Yugoslavia or Katherine, Princess of Yugoslavia. Verbcatcher (talk) 14:02, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

text: you may not have noticed that the page move has been reverted. There was no discussion here, although there was an exchange at User talk:Marija Marijanovic. I would support a move back to to Katherine Karađorđević. There have also been various unsourced additions and uses of 'Crown Princess' that conflict with MOS:HONORIFIC – I may address these when I have time. Verbcatcher (talk) 00:23, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I moved it back. Move protection might be necessary to prevent further vandalism. JoelleJay (talk) 00:52, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not even her courtesy title is "Crown Princess" 

message: She should not be included in the category of Jewish royalty until proven otherwise. MosheEmes (talk) 21:07, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed :Category:Romaniote Jews, which was unsourced. Verbcatcher (talk) 14:08, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jewish?
Talk:Kathleen Barr

message: Does anyone have any confirmation she was born in 1973? It's 1967 according to most sources.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by WestBounce (talk • contribs) 22:40, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of Birth Change

message: My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic - (The Great and Powerful) Trixie, Hoops
I'm not disputing whether or not she did it, but where does the name of the second character come from?JIMfoamy1 (talk) 05:49, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure, but she also does Queen Chrysalis in the same series.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.248.252.153 (talk) 02:39, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source on name? 

message: This article claims that Kathleen Barr has been active since 1979, but I don't think that's accurate. You see, many anime series, especially back in those days, spent years if not decades undiscovered by English-speaking audiences before dubbing companies like The Ocean Group finally produced versions they could understand. So while the Galaxy Express 999 movie originally came out in 1979, the Canadian English dub wasn't produced/released until 1996. However, many of those original Japanese release years are still on her page's credits list instead of the dub years. Shouldn't we change that? --Bybbyy (talk) 11:50, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates Active 

message: I know this is kind of a dumb question to ask, but why is an infobox pointless for the article now. Because it doesn’t make any sense to not include one, because every other actor/actress articles have infobox in their articles, why can’t we not include it for Kathleen Barr anymore? I hope someone can answer this question for me because Geraldo Perez keeps claiming that it’s pointless to include in here in the article. No matter how many times I add it back in, it gets removed again. But like I said, I’m not trying to start an edit war on it, I just wanted to understand why we can’t include it anymore. If someone can answer this for me, that would be better for me to understand and I will respect it. Again, I apologize for restoring it back over and over again. 50.79.191.241 (talk) 20:04, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia:Disinfoboxes goes over some of the reasons, it is an essay - some editor's opinion, and I don't agree with all of it. Not every actor has one either, just when it has enough information to be useful as a summary and editors think it adds value to the reader to have one. It is an editorial choice to have one or not. In this case the article is short and the infobox just repeats what is in the opening phrase of the article (name and occupation) and first entry of filmography (first notable activity year). It adds no value to the reader and just takes up page space. If it had at least sourced birth info, I personally would consider it useful at that point as age would also show up, but other editors would like to see more than even that to support one. Geraldo Perez (talk) 02:48, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox pointless?
Talk:Kathryn Leigh Scott

message: What is up with this awful sketch? Not only is it an eyesore, but it is actually detracting from the quality of the article - just compare to any real photo of her from the links section, no resemblance whatsoever. Looks like somebody took their child's random drawing of mommy, scribbled "Kathryn Leigh Scott" on it, and posted it. Also, the author of that drawing cannot possibly be notable - 400 results on google. Aren't there bots patrolling this crapshack to clean up the garbage? Buttboy666 22:00, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Scratch that, another user fixed this already, good edit! Buttboy666 22:10, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Image
Talk:Kathy Webb

message: A user under the name of User:Rep kathy webb made some edits to the page this morning (diff), causing me to post a COI warning on that user's talk page. Subsequently, a COI tag has been added to the article. Having looked over the edits made by the potentially-conflicted user, I don't think there's much to worry about. The edits were in three parts:
* changing "over 56 percent of the vote" to "57 percent of the vote"
**Note: according to the ref, Webb won 56.50% of the vote. Having run the calculation myself, the exact number is 56.502572%, which does indeed round to 57%
* editing the list of committee memberships
**Note: the previous list included out-of-date information (she was vice chair of the JBC last session; this session she's co-chair) that this user corrected
* adding additional awards
**Note: I've not googled each award, but it would certainly be possible to verify each one. I personally think that the list of awards adds nothing to the article and would be in favor of removing entirely but, if it stays, it should certainly be up-to-date
In summary, I don't think that the potentially-conflicted edits are cause for concern. The COI tag states that a "major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject". Based on the limited edits made this morning, I don't think it's fair to call User:Rep kathy webb a "major contributor" to this article nor do I think there's any further cleanup needed to comply with Wikipedia policies. I therefore propose that the tag should be removed. Anyone disagree? --Lincolnite (talk) 15:46, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The editor who added the COI tag has indicated on my talk page that he's happy for it to be removed. I have therefore removed it. --Lincolnite (talk) 00:50, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: COI tag
Talk:Katie Hall (American politician)

message: The lead to this article is too long, in violation of WP:LEAD standards. The lead should summarize major parts of the article, not a complete reiteration of the article. Interested editors are encouraged to review and comment about this point to suggest edits and reductions. Go4thProsper (talk) 22:08, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead is too long
Talk:Katrine Trolle

message: She is a notable trial witness.  I'm not too keen on reducing an article to a redirect without serious discussion.  Since she was a notable witness in 2 trials, where do we redirect her to? PatGallacher (talk) 01:29, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: She's notable ONLY for her involvement in two related trials. The narrative of the criminal trial will lead the reader to the earlier case I'm sure, since she's a witness in the criminal trial only because she was a witness in the earlier trial. There's noting notable beyond the info in the trial articles, which the reader will easily find if we redirect.--Scott Mac 01:35, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

text: Eh? Yes she is a lot less notable than them, Wouldn't you say? Or is sleeping with Tommy Sheridan as notable as sleeping with Bill Clinton? We don't go to AFD since there's no need to delete anything - this information can be covered in other articles. If you don't agree with redirecting, can you outline your reasons, and what information would be lost by so redirecting?--Scott Mac 21:20, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Kayleigh Pearson

message: 1996 seems very odd as the date for Pearson to have started at Bewdley High School. I know that's what Babepedia says, but nevertheless it seems wrong. The reason is that until a couple of years ago - and certainly in 1996 - Bewdley High School was part of a three-tier system, and pupils generally started high school at 13. To have begun at age 11 - two years early - Pearson would have had to have been exceptionally academically gifted, and there's no indication in the article that she was. Loganberry (Talk) 23:50, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  School dates 
Talk:Glarner Sprinter

message: This article imples that, on its weekend only runs to Linthal, the Glarner Sprinter serves stops between Nidfurn-Haslen and Rüti GL inclusive. But trying to check this on the SBB's web site, I cannot find any sign of this. All the Glarner Sprinter trains I get from the online journey planner run non-stop between Schwanden and Linthal Braunwaldbahn. So I've added cite needed to the entries to ensure that we have a citable source. -- chris_j_wood (talk) 12:23, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: No response, so being bold. -- chris_j_wood (talk) 10:53, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does the Glarner Sprinter really serve stops between Nidfurn-Haslen and Rüti GL inclusive 
Talk:Keeley Davis

message: I agree that it should be a guitarist stub and a singer stub.  he was a singer-guitarist for engine down, but he is currently the guitarist only for sparta.  he's also a singer-guitarist for glos, but that's beside the point.  also there's information located under the stub notation.  i don't think that's proper.
Youdontsmellbad 01:00, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub assessment
Talk:Keiko Bonk

message: Please see the guidelines for biographies of living people. Will replaced with sourced info as it is found:
:Bonk's first career was as a painter and musician in the East Village, Manhattan during the 1980s. She was known for bringing together many different musicians and painters around a variety of projects, including the largest rock-n-roll band in history, known as the East Village Orchestra, which had over 100 members. Bonk was known for hosting parties and events that brought together the best of her often alienated and disaffected generation of artists and musicians, many of whom went on to become major stars in the entertainment world. Keiko Bonk had two rock-n-roll bands during her time in New York, "His Masters Voice," and "Cosmic Oven," the former of which recorded the album "Missionary" in 1984.  Even after returning to her home in Hawaii, and getting re-involved in electoral politics, Keiko Bonk continued to play original music and paint.  Her first band after her return was "The Monkey Wrench Gang."  She played in "Keiko Bonk and Kazan (volcano)," and released a CD titled "Save the World" in 2007.  Bonk's paintings continue to show in occasional shows in Hawaii and around the world. 
W Nowicki (talk) 00:06, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced material removed
Talk:Sir Keith Arbuthnot, 8th Baronet

message: You state here that these different sources. What is the difference between that Debrett of 1998 and 2007? and Burkes book and website - these are the same sources--Vintagekits 01:15, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Furthermore I have click on the two web pages you have provided and Sir Keith Arbuthnot does not appear on these pages - why have you listed them?--Vintagekits 01:17, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Great questions. 1 Debrett's Peeerage and Baronetage is a different book from Debrett's Distinguished People of Today. First is red. Second is blue.  2. Burke's is a different publisher. 3. Cracroft's is subscribers only - so become a subscriber and you will find him. Left column. 4. the Peerage is Mr Lundy's site and Sir Keith pops up in front of me when I click the link. Maybe your cache needs clearing. Or your cookies. They all independently confirm notability. - Kittybrewster 02:52, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have just noticed that each of the references provide each provide the exact same information - pretty much word for word.--Vintagekits 03:11, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It would be strange if they provided different information. The point is that they are independant and confirmatory. - Kittybrewster 12:55, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: My point is that they all read exactly the same infact they are all copies of each other, none of the sources provides anymore (or less for that matter) then the other sources. It gives no depth of coverage.--Vintagekits 13:06, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If all four sources provide the same information then the other three should be removed as they are redundant.--Vintagekits 14:59, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Wrong. - Kittybrewster 15:03, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

text: "Wrong" doesnt help us here. I articles that I have written, where the information is doubled up/overlaps and all the information can come from one source then the others sources have been removed as being redundant.--Vintagekits 15:13, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Same sources?
Talk:Keith Campbell (biologist)

message: I have reverted the edits that added a date of death. We need an obituary or news article to make such a change. --Racklever (talk) 12:38, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Death ?

message: I changed the reference to Campbell being "Scottish" to "British" as, although there are significant claims to him being Scottish, the fact remains that he was born in England to an English mother and Scottish father, and spent significant parts of his childhood in both England and Scotland. On balance, he appears to be objectively more English than Scottish but I've gone for the compromise position of saying he's British. Does anyone know if Campbell self-identified as either English or Scottish? --Archstanton (talk) 02:06, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nationality? 
Talk:Keith Jenkins

message: If this article fails wikipedia notability standards, then it should be merged into the "Narrative and History" section of the "Philosophy of History" article.  
The same should be done with material from the Hayden White article (regardless of whether the Hayden White article meets the notability standard).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Israelgale (talk • contribs) 01:10, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging this article 

message: He seems notable given that a 'theme issue of the journal Rethinking History was dedicated to his work'. So I've removed the tag. Ben Finn (talk) 17:54, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Keith Reid

message: I think it has been settled that Matthew Fisher at least shares credit for A Whiter Shade of Pale.  Any reason why he shouldn't be added to this article's discussion of the song?  --Kcrossle (talk) 02:04, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, the lyrics are solely Reid's and credit for them has never been claimed by Fisher. In any case the issue is adequately covered in the AWSOP article. --Pfold (talk) 12:39, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Credit for A Whiter Shade of Pale

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.allmusic.com/artist/keith-reid-mn0000080853/biography. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Diannaa (talk) 19:53, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Keith Stanovich

message: Keith E. Stanovich writes many interesting books and articles, and his works are mentioned on two bibliographies I keep for wikipedians to use in verifying articles. See the  source lists both for works by Stanovich and for reactions to his works, and feel free to suggest more sources for any of the lists. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk, how I edit) 22:05, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source Lists to Share with Other Wikipedians