lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:They Call Me Mister Tibbs!

message: I've removed the section on pop culture references because I seriously doubt they are referring to this film:  
*In Season 5 of Curb Your Enthusiasm, Larry David utters the words "Call me Mister Tibbs" while in bed with his wife. 
*The film is occasionally referenced and quoted in the 1990s comedy show Mystery Science Theater 3000. An example can be observed in the episode 0301 (Cave Dwellers) when Tom Servo, upon being asked what name he would choose for himself, if given the chance, one of his answers is "They call me Mister Tibbs".
These are more likely references to the very well-known quote from the very well-known film In the Heat of the Night, and not its much less known sequel. --Ddawn23 07:20, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: IIRC, I think there was a scene near the end of The Lion King, where Pumbaa say something like that (may have been a direct quote) before charging at a group of hyenas.  WAVY 10 Fan (talk) 19:50, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pop culture references?
Talk:Eastern screech owl

message: Wasn't a screech owl featured prominently in the movie My Cousin Vinny? It was that scene where they're out in the woods thinking they might actually get some sleep, when instead an owl kept them up with its screeching. We should work that into this article somehow.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mblumber (talk • contribs) 03:16, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pop culture 

message: Need a reference to and description of (and if available, an audio of) its call and why it is so named.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Softlavender (talk • contribs) 09:47, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sound 
Talk:Muhammad Thakurufar Al-Azam

message: The title Muhammad Thakurufar Al-Azam is wrong. I am not sure about the correct form, but I think it should be Muhammad Thakurufaanu Al-Azam. Anyone? --Oblivious 01:10, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: There exists the same article in the proposed name Muhammad Thakurufaanu Al-Azam. I have added merge templates to both the artciles. Once merged, this should become redirect page or pherhaps be delete? --Oblivious 04:25, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Redirect to Muhammad Thakurufaanu Al-Azam (which is the correct title) --Oblivious 08:16, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Title
Talk:Allan Burns

message: Hi, I remember seeing 'Allan Burns' in the credits to The Munsters, is there anyone with information on that to put it on the page?69.119.204.184 (talk) 20:05, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have restored links to The Munsters and My Mother the Car, which were removed on 31 May 2006. (Instead of adding two links, somebody that day simply replaced these two!) Ailanto (talk) 01:20, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Allan Burns is married to Joan Bailey Burns and has two sons, Eric and Matt.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.43.32.81 (talk) 16:40, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personal
Talk:William of Malmesbury

message: Small typo fixed - "andmany shrewd judgments" under "significance" heading.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/trail/conquest/norman/william_the_conqueror_02.shtml
here's a source regarding the statement of his parents' origin- not sure how to cite sources with the wiki
:Unfortunately the BBC isn't a reliable source for medieval history. Andrew Dalby 22:31, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What does being "English" mean in 1095 CE? Is it Angle, Saxon, Welsh, Celtic, Danish, all of the aforementioned? Who are the indigenous "English?" Stevenmitchell (talk) 12:29, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Routh–Hurwitz stability criterion

message: i threw together this page really quick, but i didn't have the time (nor do i know enough of the specifics) to flesh it out right now. any help would be appreciated.--Whiteknight 01:53, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)

message: I've added a table method for higher order polynomials. This method was taught to me as part of my Control and Mechatronics course and referred to as the "Routh-Hurwitz Method". Looking on Wikipedia, I couldn't find a mention of it so I've placed it here. If somebody could clarify if this is the true name, then make the required changes (also the page mentions the Jury Test, but theres nothing here.
Also could someone wikify the table?
And D(s)=a_ns^n+a_{n-1}s^{n-1}+...+a_1s+a_0 is a latex bug (the '-' shouldn't be there)?
:: It was taught (and I use that term loosly...) as "Routh-Hurwitz tabulation" in my Control course. 122.49.140.246 12:27, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  fixed now, 122.49.140.246 12:23, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Table Method 

message: Appendix A seems to proof "f is stable" from the assumption "f is stable". Seems like a useless statement. Or am I missing the point here?
Haha I don't know what point he is trying to make either. If q = 0, then 2q = 0...Are they joking? I reckon delete too.  Jez 006 (talk) 21:40, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Appendix A  

message: For the criteria for a fourth-order polynomial a_4 s^4+a_3 s^3+a_2 s^2+a_1 s+a_0, the page stated that all coefficients be positive, that a_3 a_2>a_4 a_1, and that a_3 a_2 a_1>a_4 a_1^2 + a_0 a_3^2; but all coefficients being positive and a_3 a_2 a_1>a_4 a_1^2 + a_0 a_3^2 automatically imply that a_3 a_2>a_4 a_1 + \frac {a_0 a_3^2} {a_1}, so the criterion that a_3 a_2>a_4 a_1 is redundant. Am I making any mistake, or is there really redundancy in the page? Thanks! --131.111.5.177 (talk) 21:27, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The element for s^4 is now just one so that we do not care that a_4 must be positive and could remove one of the elements. You are mistaken: the bigger statements imply that all elements are positive, okay? Certainly, the smaller creterion is redundent, sure, if we now assume all are positive, as required for any degree polinomial. Valery Zapolodov (talk) 00:51, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fourth-order polynomials 

message: The section Routh-Hurwitz stability criterion#Routh–Hurwitz criterion for second, third, and fourth-order polynomials, which was added in 2011 by a single-edit contributor, cannot be right as stated, because the number of conditions is supposed to equal the degree rather than exceed it. I'm going to correct it in the 2nd and 3rd degree cases. Could someone who knows the 4th degree case check it? Loraof (talk) 22:18, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  2nd, 3rd, and 4th degree polynomials
Talk:Bryan Adams (album)

message: Is the album still in print, or did it go the way of this album? The issue of whether or not its still in print should be covered in the article. 64.180.93.200 (talk) 21:18, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Still In Print?
Talk:Constitutional convention (political meeting)

message: --------- 
There have also been all 50 US states which have passed resolutions through their state legislatures calling for a new Constitutional Convention, more than the two-thirds required by Article V.
That line is totally unclear.  Perhaps the person who wrote it, or someone who knows what he was trying to say, could rephrase.
--------
Representatives do not have to live in the District they represent, but must be in the State; Article I, Section 2, Clause 2:
No Person shall be a Representative who shall not ... be an Inhabitant of that State in which he shall be chosen.
*Yes, however, its pretty much unanimous that states impose their own requirements, including residing within their district, although as some state attorney generals have stated, "residency is a state of mind."69.173.98.243 06:57, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Clearing some stuff up

message: Might anybody add a description of a Constitutional Convention of a trade union (cf. United Auto Workers)?
Gerd-HH (talk) 18:53, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Constitutional Convention of a trade union 

message: Other wikipedia pages say that prohibition was repealed by convention.
United States: Annapolis Convention (1786), which proposed what became the Philadelphia Convention (1787) – Drafted the United States Constitution for ratification by the states. Article V of the constitution sets forth a mechanism whereby future constitutional conventions can be held. The constitution has been amended several times since the Philadelphia Convention, but never (as of 2011) by this method
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitutional_convention_(political_meeting)
vs
Congress may require ratification by special convention. The convention method has been used only once, to approve the 21st Amendment (repealing prohibition, 1933).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Us_constitution#Article_Five:_Amendments  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sdavidg (talk • contribs) 01:03, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prohibition Repeal 

message: Seven states have held constitutional conventions. The arcane questions then arises, does every state include this procedure in its constitution? I have NO idea how to research this unless I can get my hands on a certain political science textbook, and perhaps not even then. kencf0618 (talk) 15:41, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ubiquitous Boilerplate?
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Log/2005 June 10

message: The three step process seems to be broken... Process says add 
to bottom of this page as third step.  Neither that, nor a copy of the "{{Wikipedia votes for deletion..." line (suitably altered) seems to want to take. HELP!!!  Arghhhh-  subst:vfd3  works in preview changing sense above!  Please explain! Fabartus 02:12, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Talk:AppFuse

message: It looks like AppFuse is *not* a framework, but an application that let's you create project skeleton just like how most IDEs do, or what the django-admin does. To quote the official AppFuse page : « At its core, AppFuse is a project skeleton, similar to the one that's created by your IDE when you click through a wizard to create a new web project » http://appfuse.org/display/APF/Home --80.9.223.6 (talk) 18:05, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: AppFuse doesn't seem to be a Framework

message: * AppFuse seems to meet the Google Hit Count Test for notability. But does it deserve its own article? Not if that article only contains 3 sentences that are just a bare description of the project. I've labelled the article a stub, which should encourage interested people to add material. If that doesn't happen, we should consider folding AppFuse into a more general article. ---Isaac R 02:14, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Should there be a separate AppFuse article?
Talk:Outcast (video game)

message: The control of the player character was actually rather problematic. The second item is that the original release was quite buggy, as is described in the section "Release". These factors probably contributed to the commercial failure of this project: Steep learning curve, bad control, high demand on computer power while the delivered production values were below those of programs with hardware acceleration (s. comment by Nil Einne), bugs that interrupted gameplay or prevented you from completing quests. This criticism should somehow be added to the article, perhaps somebody can find a review from back then?(91.63.226.72 (talk))  —Preceding undated comment added 02:34, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gameplay 

message: Are you guys SURE that everything was voxel? The characters seem rather polyrendered to me. // Gargaj 21:01, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually when Outcast that nifty 3D hardware had started to become commonplace which was one of the big problems. Outcast was designed in such a way that it couldn't take advantage of the nifty 3D hardware so it was panned for it's high requirements and low res Nil Einne 16:03, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Voxel ratio? 

message: "Ka
     The essence of wind, it is obviously the rarest essence ever to manifest."
Why is it "obviously" the rarest? Is there some backstory that all wikipedia readers are supposed to know beforehand, to be able to read this article? Just state that it's the rarest, because we just happen to not live in that fictional planet so we AREN'T SUPPOSED TO KNOW THAT. 200.121.137.167 19:25, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Talan Essences 

message: http://www.outcast-thegame.com/ is a dead link (redirects to Atari home website). Suggest replacing it with http://web.archive.org/web/20080420151516/http://www.outcast-thegame.com/. --82.45.115.238 (talk) 00:42, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Broken Official link

message: No screenshots of the actual game are given in the article. It's hard to get a feel for the graphics of the game without screenshots. 75.170.46.193 (talk) 18:23, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  No screenshots? 

message: Some idiot completely trashed the plot section with. Please refer to the version history.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.200.70.50 (talk) 17:34, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: According to the PlayStation Store, Outcast was "the first 3D open-world game in video game history." Is that an accurate assertion?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.203.143.126 (talk) 12:16, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  First 3D open-world game?
Talk:Fantasiestücke, Op. 12

message: Well, maybe neutrality isn't the best word, but it is certainly un-encyclopedic.  It sounds a little like a blurb in a music catalog, and is vague in its praise.  I don't mean to sound so horrible, but it certainly needs to be cleaned.P.L.A.R. 02:22, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: The individual movements qualify for merging under the Wikipedia guidelines, to the best of my perception: there is significant overlap with this main article, to the point of redundancy among the individual articles; the description of each movement is brief and will likely remain so; and the context provided by this page is virtually necessary for understanding those of the individual movements.  (Furthermore, the creator of these other articles has been compelled to amend the name of one of the movements, Fabel, presumably to avoid ambiguity; this is unnecessary, however, and potentially misleading.)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.3.175.242 (talk) 01:49, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  The articles should be merged.  There certainly aren't any size problems.  The movements of an individual work should not be individual articles.  Asmeurer (talk  ♬ contribs) 03:56, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

text: Merge. Jason Quinn (talk) 20:53, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Just did the merge.  Lots of duplicate information now.  Will trim that away over the next few days.DavidRF (talk) 04:38, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposals 

message: This isn't right: "Fantasiestücke in Callots Manier by his favourite poet, E. T. A. Hoffmann". His favourite author?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.17.76.24 (talk) 07:53, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hoffmann the what? 

message: I came to this page to see whether there was any information on Schumann's three Fantasiestücke, Op. 111. The Op. 12 were not his only Fantasiestücke.
Deschreiber (talk) 01:24, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I think Schumann's op. 111 is commonly known as Drei Fantasiestücke, so there is no need to change this title; if an article on op. 111 gets written, a hatnote will do. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 10:24, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Ten years later: Three Fantasiestücke, Op. 111 has now been written (as was Fantasiestücke, Op. 73, which leaves Phantasiestücke, Op. 88), but according the 1st edition, the title should be spelled Phantasiestücke, Op. 12. The same spelling concern applies to Opp. 73 and 111, both spelled with "Ph" in the 1st edition. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 12:43, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title of this article should be Fantasiestücke Op. 12
Talk:Trey Parker

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Braniff Productions and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 14#Braniff Productions until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Onel5969 TT me 13:49, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Braniff Productions" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: in the Early Life section, please add that he graduated from Evergreen High School.
https://www.westword.com/arts/trey-cool-5060031 2600:100C:A210:2BB2:9DCF:2D8C:B67F:3616 (talk) 07:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 14:36, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request  

message: June 2023 Trey announced his intention to run for nomination of Vice President of the United States via the Libertarian Party in 2024 or possibly 2028. Source https://twitter.com/TreyParker4VP/status/1669939962198859777 97.102.226.109 (talk) 14:17, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Pinchme123 (talk) 21:09, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 9 August 2023 

message: I have a small revision that a I think significantly raises the level of the sentence it's in. 
In the sentence, "South Park: Bigger, Longer & Uncut (1999), received good reviews from both critics and fans." the word "good" is underpowered , kind of flabby, doesn't do much to add meaning. So take it out and revise the sentence to read something like, "South Park: Bigger, Longer & Uncut (1999), was well-received by both critics and fans." 
Thanks for taking the time to consider my revision. I'm a huge fan. South ark has been on non-stop since I got home from work Friday night. It's a key component of a kick-ass weekend.
Please email if you use my revision. I would be so stoked!
Best,
Keally Newmann
--Keally Newmann (talk) 15:54, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: as well as another occurrence of the word. Also, next time, make edit requests that are straight to the point. The 🏎 Corvette 🏍 ZR1(The Garage) 17:30, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 20 January 2024
Talk:WWVB

message: My understanding is that there was a problem exposed by a change in modulation in 2012.  http://ka7oei.blogspot.com/2013/02/did-nist-break-bunch-of-radio.html    174.25.57.105 (talk) 00:10, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem with receivers in 2012 

message: Is the increased propagation distance at night due to skywave propagation? ZFT (talk) 21:49, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Propagation 

message: There is an article Time running out on atomic-clock station in Fort Collins claiming that "The National Institute for Standards & Technology based in Boulder may close its time-signal radio station in Fort Collins [...] as part of agency-wide  proposed budget cuts".  There is a similar article at NPR.
Trump has proposed to cut the budget of the NIST from $954 million to $629 million. 
Is it too early to mention that on this page?
--The very model of a minor general (talk) 22:39, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Done, with a "horse's mouth" reference. Jeh (talk) 12:24, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Closing soon?
Talk:Subphylum

message: Dear Mrs.weresch,
 About the life systems page that you gave us on our diversity of living things project. The part were you state that we have to identify the animals phylum (invertebrates) or class (vertebrate). Don't you mean subphylum instead of class. I don't know if you meant to put that or not, but I put a defanition and you can tell me if I m right or wrong. 
      The subphylum
In biological term, a division between phylum and class
The rank of plants and fungi are equivalent to subphylum. Not all phyla are divided into subphylum. 
Subphylums are actually verebrates/vertebratas
                 I don't know if think that this is right or not.
Thank you for your time,
    Geneva
==
I removed Craniata - it's a superset of Vertebrata and at most one of them can be considered a subphylum. I left Vertebrata as it's the better known. Orcoteuthis (talk) 15:25, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Convention People's Party

message: —Seselwa 03:08, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)

message: ==Untitled==
Obviously this is just a stub, but the article remains largely comprised of party propaganda, with little attempt at external analysis.  Some section on the party's history and prominence around independence is needed, then the continuation through to the present day.
== Wrong reference? ==
Hello,
The reference number 34 from the chapter about the CPP's structure can't be the one, where the information originally came from, right? 2A00:A200:0:E00:0:0:0:450 (talk) 11:35, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Bias

message: Hello,
The reference number 34 from the chapter about the CPP's structure can't be the one, where the information originally came from, right? 2A00:A200:0:E00:0:0:0:450 (talk) 11:35, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong reference?
Talk:Anti-social Behaviour Act 2003

message: This needs loads. The law looks interesting in the way it targets folk devil groups and has specific sections on social housing tenants. This is a law that can ban you from your house (providing you are poor) and you can go to prison if you break it! 
:Not just can - this already has been done. I can't find a link to the full story now, but do remember reading it at the time. Once the ASBO was challeneged it was thrown out, due to lack of evidence, IIRC. I believe the article pointed out the difference level of proof required to get an ASBO, saying that this would have never had satisified the burden any other criminal punishment would be. MartinRe 19:00, 9 January 2006 (UTC)