lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:HIARCS

message: Why did Baccyak4H take out two significant points about Hiarcs 13?
1) Hiarcs 13 ran on a mobile phone HTC Touch HD. The hiarcs page said this. See http://www.hiarcs.com/Games/Mercosur2009/mercosur09.htm
2) Hiarcs 13 on the mobile phone, HTC Touch HD, searches less 20,000 positions per second. One of the programmers said this. See http://hiarcs.net/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2537&start=67
You also made it harder to read by combining three sentences in one long run on sentence. Mschribr (talk) 12:03, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: refined it ∞4 (talk) 21:09, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

text: added ∞4 (talk) 21:09, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hiarcs 13 inside the Pocket Fritz 4 

message: Better language and grammar, better paragraph structure, more details and facts, more references, and more links. Look forward to my further contributions to computer chess on wikipedia in the future. Cheers! ∞4 (talk) 21:09, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  I made several large refinements to the article 
Talk:Mongolian barbecue

message: Despite this article appearing on "Did you know", unfortunately, the starting point of this article is completely false. This dish is a copy of "Jingisukan" , a Japanese dish. There is even a "Jingisukan Promotion Committee"  launched by relevant companies, restaurants, universities, and Australian Consulate, Sapporo (Australia is the chief exporter of lamb and mutton to Japan). --Revth 06:04, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposal for a complete rewrite and moving the article

message: I looked in my handy Canon Wordtank G55 and the definition of ジンギスカン鍋 was "(a) mutton barbeque". This, coupled with the fact that every single restaurant I have ever visited in Hokkaido (the main area where jingisukan is eaten) calls mutton (raw or cooked) "jingisukan", leads me to believe that the word ジンギスカン (jingisukan) in Japanese means mutton. I think that the jingisukan section of this article should be revised (or completely removed and made into a separate article) and ジンギスカン (jingisukan) should be properly defined as the Japanese word for mutton; especially the grilled-style mutton in Hokkaido. In other words, there is no inherent relation to the pan or vegetables in the word ジンギスカン (jingisukan). 
Though there may be a dish called ジンギスカン焼き or some such that relates to Mongolian Barbeque, that's a different issue.  Yaki-gaijin (talk) 07:47, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jingisukan definition 

message: Khorkhog isnt exactly BBQ, as it is not fried. --Chinneebmy talk 12:34, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The Real BBQ" comment 

message: No soldier would even think of using the tools of his trade as cooking pans. These were the implements into which he entrusts his life. Is he going to destroy them putting them on fires just so he can have a nice stiry fry. This is a nice marketing story but is actually total BS for anyone with half a brain.
Stupid retarded hearsay.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.174.77.179 (talk) 15:03, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Spurious Cooking Methods
Talk:Nosema ceranae

message: Nosema has now been reassigned to Vairimorpha: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31738888/ - should this be renamed, along with N. apis?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:4F00:500:2101:C1A1:5266:4498:8F9C (talk) 11:12, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Renamed
Talk:Migration Period sword

message: I was under the impression that it isn't definitively known where the spatha originated except that it was adopted from Auxilia who could be either Germanic or Celtic. Maybe there is some confusion with the Gladius on the authors part, either way I'm changing the article to reflect this lack of certainty. 90.219.166.180 (talk) 15:14, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Spatha, Celtic?

message: * Oppose. The Blučina burial contained more than a sword and has implications well beyond this single artifact. :bloodofox: (talk) 14:14, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Request to merge Blučina burial into this article
Talk:Bronze Age sword

message: I am tired of tolerating the unreferenced WP:REDFLAGs here. If anyone has evidence of bronze swords predating 1700 BC, let them produce decent references. --dab (𒁳) 15:22, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: to be added? https://edition.cnn.com/style/article/5000-year-old-sword-discovered-in-italy-trnd/index.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.116.154.58 (talk) 02:51, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: sources please

message: "The early swords, called rapiers, typically h..."
I am a little sceptical about this... Source and reference?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.52.29.72 (talk) 18:17, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sounds scetchy 

message: My understanding is that the Falcata was also made of bronze.
Theblindsage (talk) 06:57, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Falcata 

message: "From an early time the swords reach lengths in excess of 100 cm." - a sentence like this is not worthy of being in a serious historical, archaeological article...!!! "From an early time..." - what does this nebulous formulation mean?? data please, figures... see also above: "sources please" - I agree! avanti dilettanti (still: thanx that there is an article at all...)! --HilmarHansWerner (talk) 07:00, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  more chronological precision please! 
Talk:James W. Moseley

message: Mr. Moseley passed away on November 16, 2012. I have updated this bio page to reflect that. The main source for this information is linked here: http://copycateffect.blogspot.com/2012/11/moseley-obit.html 70.145.229.162 (talk) 01:40, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Good edits.  Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 02:03, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Death

message: I have taken a copy of this article and I am working on it to improve the references, wikify it, increase links for context, etc.
If any other editors have any additional information, please leave the citation here on the talk page and I will add it in. --Gronk Oz (talk) 02:16, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The new version is up now.  It ended up becoming a much more comprehensive rewrite than I first envisioned, including many new references that I came across in researching it.  The end result is much more comprehensive and coherent, supported by references - I hope it meets with your approval, but if not please drop a note in my Talk page so we can discuss.  --Gronk Oz (talk) 15:31, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean up citations, etc 
Talk:Nisswa, Minnesota

message: Ok, it seems strange to me, but they really want this article merged into this tiny town page. I'll do it but it seems like a mistake. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brent Severnie (talk • contribs) 18:33, May 27, 2021 (UTC)
:It was at AFD, and a decision was made to merge it rather then delete it entirely. Please don't merge articles without providing attribution (I have done so) and please do not delete relevant material from the original article's talk page (I have restored it). Also, a merge result on an AFD does not mean that we keep every bit of the original article. There was very little in the way of reliable, independent or non-local sourcing for this race, and it does not appear to be very significant. There is no need to have 80% of this article be about this race. I will significantly trim the content. Meters (talk) 19:54, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: Other events need to be added to this page. Having 1500 people show up for a race isn't that big of an event. New York City Marathon is 50,000, which makes it notable. Are there any notable evennts here?````  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brent Severnie (talk • contribs) 04:00, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Events
Talk:Camp Fire Girls (novel series)

message: There are many unrelated stories under the label "Camp Fire Girls."  For some reason, this entry seems to group them together in a single list as if they were connected.  This is misleading.  Instead of one series, there are many.  A given publisher would have its own series with an author or pen name. Keeline (talk) 21:22, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multiple Series
Talk:West Indian cricket team in England in 1900

message: I can't quite see how Jessop's innings could have been from 2:30 to 3:30. It is reported as such in Brodribb's biography of Jessop. Play probably started at 12:00 and there would have been 40 or 45 minutes for lunch. Given that he came in at 299-5 it must surely have been later in the day when he batted. Also it is reported that the close of play score was 518-7 so unless there was rain late in the day this also doesn't match the 3:30 dismissal either. Needs more research.Nigej 19:12, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I took it from Brodribb. If it is not plausible, let's just remove it. Tintin 01:55, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Jessop's Innings

message: Have added this section but quite happy to have it decimated since my white, English, middle-class background doesn't make me the ideal author.Nigej 19:12, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Race Issues

message: Have removed the following note since the book has not been used as yet Nigej 14:56, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference
Talk:Perce Blackborow

message: I removed this from the main page:
Note: Though the spelling of his name has been questioned, the poster is related to the Blackborow family and he appears to have been known to them as Perce Blackborow.
...because it seemed like unverifiable primary source/research. However, I think there are enough other sources ("Perce Blackborow" produces three times the Google hits that "Perce Blackborrow" does, for instance) that simply asserting that his name is Blackborow works. If someone can think of a better way to handle that information, please chime in! Orbicular 21:05, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Suspension (school punishment)

message: What type of references would be necessary for this article? I also feel it needs some controversy coverage, over the 'benefits' of suspension. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ClEeFy (talk • contribs) 
:News clippings, scholarly works, books... see WP:RS for a full description about what's a good source. SchuminWeb (Talk) 18:14, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Treadwell gold mine

message: Dear editors, please fix this, as it's already been tagged as an autobiography at WP:COI.  Please fix it soon, or, I'll tag it as COI, POV, and non-notable.  Good luck! Bearian 19:28, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm going to withdraw the tag, as others have begun to add pertinent source material.  Carajou 15:01, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

message: The source links had an excess slash at the end, which is why they were broken. Additional sources were easily found via a google search. DES (talk) 15:21, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: According to what I've seen in many pages, Wikipedia has rules for citing sources properly within the body of the text, and since the two links near the bottom went nowhere (at the time, before the discovery of the extra slash) in addition to that, the whole was tagged for deletion...but that of course changed due to some good editors making positive contributions.  Carajou 17:30, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source links 

message: I think that this GoogleBook could be of use in our efforts to expand the article, saving the link here for now. - Icewedge (talk) 00:35, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note to prospective editors
Talk:2008 in NASCAR

message: *This page should be moved to 2008 NASCAR Sprint Cup Series since 2008 in NASCAR should deal with all three levels of competition. Benje309 12:07, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: Shouldn't this page also detail major events in NASCAR, instead of being a dab for the season articles? 70.51.11.219 (talk) 06:35, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: This page

message: There should be something about rain tires and wipers, since the first points race in NASCAR history to use them was just raced at the 2008 NAPA Auto Parts 200 70.51.11.219 (talk) 06:35, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rain tires & wipers
Talk:Hyperemesis gravidarum

message: The article's stance on steroid usage namely that the evidence is weak for its efficacy and likely causes harm (cleft palate) to the fetus is dated. When administered after 10 weeks there is essentially no risk of cleft palate  as the article itself goes on to state. Cutting edge OBs with expertise on Hyperemesis will prescribe a tapered regimen of steroids for severe HG after 10-12 weeks, especially in cases when Zofran and other more conventional treatments prove insufficient. We are concerned women suffering from HG (at risk of losing their pregnancy and even their own death) reading this article may be discouraged from pursuing this highly effective treatment. See various articles proving efficacy of steroid treatment   and  and MCP McParlin C, O’Donnell A, Robson SC, et al. Treatments for hyperemesis gravidarum and nausea and vomiting in pregnancy: A systematic review. JAMA. 2016;316(13):1392-1401. and an NIH study []  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:2000:1240:81A0:4412:6F31:A7F9:39C1 (talk) 04:18, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Corticosteroids

message: Thisarticle from The New York Times might be worth adding as a reference. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/14/well/marlena-fejzo-hyperemesis-gravidarum.html Eastmain (talk • contribs) 20:56, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  New York Times article as reference
Talk:Mitch Harris

message: Is it true that he and Mick Harris are not related? - Quirk 10:42, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, they're not even from the same country. Mick is british, and mitch is american. Spearhead 11:32, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mick Harris
Talk:Purvez Musharraf

message: The page is dedicated to the President of Pakistan Purvez Musharraf. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ShivSenaPramukh (talk • contribs) 
:Irrelevant - see the reasons for the article's proposed deletion on the deletion tag on the article. ≈ The Haunted Angel 19:37, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have redirected this page to Pervez Musharraf Dina 19:37, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair enough - looks like that it was a spelling error anyway. ≈ The Haunted Angel 19:39, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Venus of Tan-Tan

message: I think its clearly a representation of a human body. Natural occurance didn't create that. It looks like 2 legs, arms, and probably breast. Not much clothes back then so they would hang down. And a faceless head...unless you interpret the two dots on the head as eyes like i did.DeWente69 (talk) 03:24, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know of the notability, except I would at the least doubt vote for keeping articles at such significant fringes as this one of the possibly oldest extant work of art; but as long as it's not scientifically settled that that's what it is, there can of course be no talk of incorporating it into an article on art. And even if that should happen, there is already a body of articles on individual prehistoric sculptures. ---Keinstein (talk) 21:57, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: well, we have Art of the Middle Paleolithic, which consists precisely of discussions on dubious material such as this. As long as we don't have very much material on this, it may make more sense to dedicate a section or paragraph to it within the context of a larger article. --dab (𒁳) 07:50, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Niagara Movement

message: DuBois and the Niagara Movement were not denied a hotel in Buffalo.  As the external link indicates, they specifically sought an out of the way resort.  For purposes of historical comparison, the National Association of Colored Women held its national convention in Buffalo in 1901 during the Pan American Exposition and there is no record of discriminatory hotelkeepers at that time.
Also, exactly what sources are needed?  The external links suply several.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Guybrarian (talk • contribs) 01:33, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The text has been updated to reflect the conflict since two sources indicate that it was racism and a third indicates that it was logistics. Also, sources used on the page have been replaced using inline citations. CJ 19:44, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hotel?

message: Unrelated, but I do believe that the movement held very diffrent views from Booker T. Washington, Washington wanted slow change, the movement wanted rapid sweeping changes.71.61.163.146 (talk) 04:21, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Booker T. Washington

message: Section 2.1 starts out strong, but, respectfully, the last sentences of the first paragraph collapse into gibberish.  I'm not at all familiar with this information (which is how I came to be reading it), but if no one addresses this soon, I'll give it a shot.  Be better if one of you history hounds correct it.  Rags (talk) 19:12, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gibberish 

message: I haven't been able to find any biographical information on co-founder H. A. Thompson, probably for lack of a first name. Anyone able to contribute? Lindenfall (talk) 22:19, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  H. A. Thompson
Talk:Underground court

message: The statement "The Special Courts tried only the pre-war citizens of Poland who were legally subjects of the Polish law" is contradicted by other articles such as Operation Heads which clearly say that German officials were "sentenced" by the Special Courts.   I get the impression there's some hair-splitting going on in a attempt to make an organ of the resistance seem like a detached court that just happens to be in occupied territory.  Somebody who knows more of the history than I do should reconcile the articles. Vox Sciurorum (talk) 23:49, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistency
Talk:Second normal form/Archive 1

message: I must say that I read this article multiple times and even after that I had to resort to finding notes from my college Database lectures. These are the points I would like to make:
1) At the beginning of the article there is a definition of 2NF which reads "irreducibly dependent" - what does it mean? Perhaps it would be better to explaint this somewhere. (Irreducibly dependent on the key means that the attribute may not depend only on some strict subset of the key.)
2) As already pointed out, the difference between 2NF and 3NF should be explained either here or in the Third normal form article. (The difference is that non-key attributes dependent solely on other non-key attributes are allowed in 2NF but not in 3NF -- 2NF eliminates only dependencies on strict subsets of the key.)
3) What happens if there is more than one candidate key? The article talks about primary key but as far as I know, the definition of 2NF works with all the keys -- this means that every occurence of "primary key" should be replaced by "each candidate key" (or something more appropriate). Maybe we could put in another example which has more than one candidate key? Also, this kind of example could show how 2NF (or even 3NF, BCNF ...) fails to resolve some particular kinds of redundancy.
Michal Burger 13:28, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hard to understand?
Talk:Fort Wayne Line

message: Unless I misunderstand things, the main focus of this article should be the Fort Wayne Line itself, which is the Norfolk Southern-owned line between Pittsburgh and Crestline. The former Fort Wayne Secondary can be covered in Chicago, Fort Wayne and Eastern Railroad. If necessary, the PRR history could be split off to Main Line (Pittsburgh to Chicago) or some such. Mackensen (talk) 17:07, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article scope 

message: The article says: The final piece, from CSX's Porter Subdivision at Tolleston northwest to NS's Chicago Line, the former LS&MS in far northwestern Gary, Indiana, at Buffington, is owned by CSX with NS trackage rights, junctioning CSX's Barr Subdivision at Clarke Junction (also in northwestern Gary). Unfortunately most of that is abandoned, NS does use part of it coming from the Porter Sub but they quickly switch over to the Wabash old right away to access CN Kirk Yard.  There is no diamond at old Clarke Jct, nor can there be a diamond because of raised CN realignment bypassing the Gary Airport. The section between the CSX and NS is abandoned in place.  Source: My job as a locomotive engineer. BeckyAnne(talk) 19:54, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Porter Sub to Barr to NS Status
Talk:Zoogz Rift

message: The portion about Zoogz Rift's musical career was copied from the AMG website. I have re-written this portion and cited a reference to Trouser Press.  I added an external link to the AMG entry so as to help establish notability (I'd have to dig around, but I can also cite magazine articles from Keyboard and SPIN from the mid-1980s). -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 20:20, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: AMG content

message: An anonymous editor had proposed deletion of this article, but did not specify any reason for deletion ().  I am not sure whether notability is a concern (it had been in the past, about four years ago, before the article had proper references).  For future reference, the subject does meet WP:MUSICBIO criteria № 1 (coverage in Trouser Press, Keyboard Magazine, and Spin) and № 5 (several albums on SST Records); he also meets № 4, although I don't really have a source for this (other than a radio recording of a Dutch concert). -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 19:57, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contested PROD
Category talk:Operas by Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart

message: Does this really belong in a list of operas by W.A. Mozart? I realise this may seem like an overly nitpicky question, but as far as I can tell, this does not belong here, just as Mendelssohn's music to A Midsummer Night`s Dream would not belong in a page devoted entitled "Operas by Mendelssohn". Every page dedicated to an opera by Mozart contains an inset on the right containing a full list of the operas he is known to have started composing, and included in this list is Thamos, König in Ägypten. I honestly don't think it should fall into this category, and am not clear on what justification there was for labeling it as an opera in the first place. Smyslov 19:47, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thamos, König in Ägypten
Talk:Colt Dragoon Revolver

message: Who likes it eh? User:Tea King
 I like it very much. Well enough to add some material (as have a couple of others I see).
I tried not to do any mischief to your basic material as I found it very much in accord with other literature on the subject.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcumpston (talk • contribs) 13:55, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

message: A section on ammunition would be helpfulTjoeC (talk) 13:32, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a black piwder revolver.--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 15:22, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ammunition 
Talk:Routing Assets Database

message: Please note that the current usage of the RADB link is to a redirect page that goes right back to this article page, BUT a replacement disambiguation page is currently being developed in my user space; the link to which is User:Dbiel/RADB
Links to user pages in articles are not permitted, which is why the link was left to the redirect page hoping anyone that was questioning it would be automatically referred to this page.
Dbiel 20:03, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:WECK

message: I have wondered about the HD that was in the info box. It has finally been removed.
This link verifies that the edit was correct. The link is apparently well kept up-to-date. It has the recent change at WLKK in its database.1archie99 (talk) 18:07, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  WECK not broadcasting in HD
Talk:WGDJ

message: It's not WCBI, as it was originally planned, it's WGDJ! Write what WGDJ stands for!WCBI-TV, LLP, owner of WCBI-TV 4, has declined to share its call letters with Capital Broadcasting, Inc., owner of WTMM-AM 1300.So they have filed for the call letters WGDJ instead.
:Why not WCBJ? Was that call sign taken or something? --72.230.46.168 (talk) 00:45, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Callsign meaning