lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Mary Jane Watson

message: How did Mary Jane Watson Parker die Who knows Can somebody tell me at all please I am dieing to know like how Mary Jane Watson Parker Died Tell me please  2600:6C5E:597E:F10B:1D4:28C9:A1B0:2EAD (talk) 17:25, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mary Jane Watson  

message: Can we please get a new main image for her, I'm begging Cordelia Van Allen (talk) 00:51, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Main Image
Talk:Daily Liberal

message: Could somebody please fill-in, in the info box, the editor and the political position of this newspaper. Regards -- Ianblair23 (talk) 07:14, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blank items in the info box 
Talk:David Keenan

message: No need to Speedy - well-known music journalist. Cnwb 07:20, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: See, for instance: 
*Interview with Keenan in Stylus magazine 
*Keenan's top100 records, in Sunday Herald 
*Site for Keenan's book England's Hidden Reverse
Cnwb 07:33, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Candidate for Speedy delete

message: Was this song (by theaudience) for him?
It's called "Bells For Davin Keenan" its just bells ringing for the whole of the song.. like church bells..
*Apparently so - the track is a reference to Telstar Ponies "Bells For Albert Ayler". I'm not 100% sure of the connection but it was something to do with Fire Records - I think theaudience's guitarist worked for them or somesuch... Ac@osr 16:46, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Bells for David Keenan" 

message: I'm a little worried that this article mixes information about two musicians by the same name. I came to the page to add information about the younger musician. The younger musician does get quite a bit of press, but the older author/musician gets more. 
Irish Times article
Have to attend to day job now by will return.Lhcollins (talk) 13:38, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mixing David Keenans?
Talk:Battle of Mu'tah

message: "Change X to Y"
This legendary battle has been mentioned in the Qur'an, in which the Qur'an says that the Muslims won this battle, pls let me edit it, Muslims were actually victorious in this battle. I have provided you the proof now please let me edit this article. I'm the best ever (talk) 12:31, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Please see WP:RS. Bestagon ⬡ 12:37, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 29 April 2024 (2)
Talk:Air traffic control radar beacon system

message: I think Mode S should be either split to a separate article or moved to Aviation transponder interrogation modes as, from the text of the article and definitions in https://scholar.afit.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4157&context=etd, it isn't a part of ATCRBS. PaulT2022 (talk) 03:16, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mode S vs ATCRBS
Talk:Distinguished Service Cross (United States)

message: My grandfather, Dwight T. Colley in the Yankee Division, is the only person (far as I know) to receive the DSC in both WW I and WW II. Would he be suitable for the Notables list? AnalogGround (talk) 14:38, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably not. Please see WP:MILPEOPLE. Chris Troutman (talk) 14:49, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

text: Do you have any sources that support your comment about your grandfather? I'm not doubting you, but without any sourcing, you wouldn't be able to add him. But with sources, and the more the better, then it's possible you could add him. Being the only person (in the army? the entire military?) to receive the DSC in both world wars might be notable. - wolf 20:09, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: (break #2)

message: Former SMU operator and Distinguished Service Cross recipient Kyle Morgan during a deployment, late 2010s. Morgan performed with bravery and audacity during a hostage rescue operation in Bamako, Mali on November 20, 2015. His actions directly influenced the success of the mission, and during it, he was able to form a combined team of multinational SOF units which carried out the rescue of hostages and civilians in the hotel resort. 170.249.170.138 (talk) 17:31, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kyle Morgan Should be on the List
Talk:Retrospective

message: this is a wiktionary, not wikipedia entry, but a looooooooad of links link here. suggestions? --Kirils 08:57, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Germans already have an own article :de:Retrospektive Studie for the more scientific stuff, corresponding to retrospective study, (Whatlinkshere). Might be a good idea to disambiguate similarly. --Nikai 23:19, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Fick's laws of diffusion

message: Most readers are likely to be interested in what these two laws mean in plain language.  Instead they are confronted with mathematical purity, derivations of the laws, and alternative formulations.  Readers want words, simple sentences with excellent English.  
The derivations and alternative equations can be buried deep at the bottom of the article, that stuff is for specialists.  As it stands, the article iss really disappointing. --Smokefoot (talk) 13:05, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Disappointing article

message: In the section [n]utrient and waste transfer of the page [r]otating locomotion in living systems, there's this sentence (links included):
Could anyone please tell me which of Fick's laws of diffusion this applies to, or if it applies more or less equally to all of them? Thylacine24 (talk) 21:33, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which of the laws is best suited for the following link?
Talk:Benelli (motorcycles)

message: I would have no problem with the split but it seems that as the article lacks in content, the two splits would probably be stubs.
--Benmwah 17:53, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't know if you are still watching this topic, but citations (sources) are needed.Seasalt 12:06, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split 
Talk:Sheep station

message: Good to see the brave editing happening in stubs!  Happy new year guys User:SatuSuro 09:29, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: comment

message: I have a question for school. How do children on a sheep station go to school/ get to school?   —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thalia grace (talk • contribs) 13:52, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Australian children who live on remote sheep stations attend the School of the Air, while   children who live on sheep stations closer to town, attend schools in the town.  Hope this helps. Figaro (talk) 15:41, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

text: Closer in, there is correspondence school. You get the weekly lessons in a bag off the mail run, and send it back next week.  School of the air is only for remote places, that did not have a weekly mail run or whatever.  Wendy.krieger (talk) 06:03, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: School lessons
Talk:T-Centralen

message: As far as I know, the Stockholm Central Station doesn't count as part of T-Centralen (which is only the metro part), so the images aren't entirely appropriate. We should perhaps have some pictures from the wall paintings and other artwork at the blue line platform. u p p l a n d 09:39, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed - these images aren't of T-Centralen, so they don't belong here. I'll remove them from the article. CLW 17:13, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Orographic lift

message: Orographic Lift is demonstrated in many places in the world, but few examples are as clear as those in the United States
This is a typically chauvinistic statement by an American. On the eastern seaboard of Australia it's just as obviously demonstrated, and probably on the western side too. In fact I'd say that almost anywhere that a large ocean meets land shows this just as "clearly". Ireland for example. This sentence is POV and ignorant. Let's come up with something a bit more universal, please. Graham 09:49, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Didn't write the original, but did revise it today. Check it and see if it works for you. Next time you're welcome to simply change it yourself; we all have some POV but Wikipedia allows each of us to propose a better wording. With luck we'll reach a better concensus summary than any of us individually can write. Williamborg 21:05, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: POV wording

message: Merge proposed by User:Beland on 18:24, 4 March 2006: 
* Oppose I oppose merging Rain Shadow into this article -- it provides a quick lay summary that would be lost among the more technical language here. Tlogmer 07:27, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge Proposal

message: I've compiled a short list of discrepancies about this image at .  If someone really knows what this is, could you please fix the ambiguity and discrepancies between the pages? (I'd consider the discussion on the image's talk page to be the appropriate primary discussion place for this issue.) --Kaze0010 03:02, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discrepancies between the description of Wavecloudsduval.jpg used on this page and on other pages

message: Someone added and then removed the the image of Machu Picchu shown here to the article. It is an intersing formation: Whitehead's Mountain Meteorology does not identify what it is. Any experts out there? 
Williamborg (Bill) 03:57, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Machu Picchu Sunset in Peru 

message: I think the section on atmospheric waves should merged with Lee waves. I would prefer that the term  'orographic lift' is confined to the rising air in front of a slope. Does anyone disagree? JMcC (talk) 15:16, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Lee waves

message: A striking example of a cap cloud may be found at http://www.flickr.com/photos/costap/481820047/  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.245.233.83 (talk) 08:49, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  CAP CLOUD 
Talk:Elongation (astronomy)

message: Is this a synonym for "angular elongation"?
mid
Elongation = difference of ecliptic longitudes  --84.179.84.159 11:04, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

message: I am pretty sure that the following sentence in this article is not true:
"Since asteroids are relatively small their magnitude can vary greatly depending on elongation."
It seems to me that size is completely irrelevant to variation in magnitude.  If two objects of the same shape but of different size are in the same orbit with respect to the Earth, their magnitudes will be different, but the variation in magnitude will be identical.  In other words, object A will become the same factor brighter or dimmer as hypothetical object B of different size, if traveling along the same relative path as seen from Earth.  I deleted a similar assertion about Mars' variation of magnitude, and I propose deleting it here also, unless someone can show me why I am wrong with an authoritative source.  There are a lot of other factors that could cause a body to vary more in relative magnitude, such as irregular shape (asteroids) or variation in surface features (e.g. Saturn's moon Iapetus).  But if the planets Jupiter and Mars were to be swapped, the dramatic variation in brightness now exhibited by Mars would be exactly matched by Jupiter's, though of course Jupiter would always be brighter because of its much larger size.
CosineKitty (talk) 02:13, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Your edits look good to me. -- Kheider (talk) 14:10, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Factual Mistake about magnitude variation
Talk:A&M Records

message: Visitors, please note: this A&M Records page has been spammed by a company called On A&M Records.  This article is linked and referenced several times (see the References section) to a commercial site that charges visitors for access to information, and these links here are being used solely to boost search engine rankings.  An official complaint has been filed with Wikipedia to stop the vandalism of this page by the spammer.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.118.119.155 (talk) 18:32, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spamming 

message: I just restructured the article (added tags, removed a lot of bytes, etc.) Edit mercilessly, critique mercifully. --I dream of horses (talk) 01:54, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restructuring of article 

message: Wasn't A&M described (tongue-in-cheek or otherwise) as referring to "Anchovy and Mozarella" records, and not (only) the names of the creators? I seem to remember this being said on liner notes for an album (Mangione's Feels So Good, perhaps?) Anyone have a lead on this one? Jkp1187 (talk) 17:17, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Anchovy & Mozzarella?
Talk:Sámi drum

message: What is 'The Samis call(ed) the drum themself for "ring."' supposed to mean?! 'themself' is not even a word, and the setence does not make sense at all.
:I'm not sure what it's supposed to mean, but "themself" most certainly is a word.  See singular they.  Cheers, Tomertalk 16:00, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ring? 

message: A merge was proposed in January 2012, but no defence given on Talk, so I am removing that template. MatthewVanitas (talk) 19:14, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oppose merge with [[ceremonial drum]] 

message: In an edit by User:MatthewVanitas in june 2012 it was added that the sami name for the drum is kannus, using a finnish book as source and evidence. A finnish book would of course give you the finnish name. 
The northern sami name is goavddis (or gobdis og meavrresgárri), and the southern sami name is gievrie. This could easily be verified through interwiki :se:Goavddis; furthermore from Varanger Museum, from a variety of offline sources, or from online dictionarys from Giellatekno. Bw --Orland (talk) 17:17, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sami name 

message: I intend to expand this article with a translation of my own FA article from norwegian, Runebomme. Informed contributions and languages fixes are most welcome. Orland (talk) 12:00, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm removing the references to this as a music subject. Thought it is a drum, there are no sources indicating that it were used within a context of musical performance. Orland (talk) 12:10, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expanding 
Talk:Pre-ejaculate

message: as regards the commons link i have added, which has been "disputed" by another user.
it is ENTIRELY CONSISTENT with policy to provide inter-wiki links for a topic.
if other "bodily fluid" articles don't have such links, they should be added.
Lx 121 (talk) 12:44, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  inter-wiki links 

message: The link in "semen coagulation" goes to a page which does not appear to have relevance (after a quick skim of the intro & TOC plus a word search of the page). Searching Wikipedia only returned one use of the term and only in a reference:
:KLK5
:"Crucial role of estrogen for the mammalian female in regulating semen coagulation and liquefaction in vivo". PLOS Genetics....
I did not edit this page, hoping that by posting here somebody else would clarify the term in this article or in Coagulation with a link to the relevant section. Thank you! 
— 71.212.139.106 (talk) 21:53, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semen coagulation?  

message: I am not sure where to find a reliable source for "pre-cum" as an alternative word for pre-ejaculate, although I do think there are a lot of sources out there that may mention that word. Unfortunately, I think a lot of sources out there that back up that "pre-cum" word just don't seem to be reliable enough for Wikipedia. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 07:49, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pre-cum reference
Talk:Ohio State Route 1

message: (1966 are all "removed 1966", 1965 is "1960-65")
*1964-1966 concurrent with I-75 from Kentucky to US 27
*1960-1962 by itself on I-75 from US 27 to St. Bernard, concurrent 1962-1966
*1960-1966 concurrent with US 25/I-75 from St. Bernard to I-70
*1960-1966 concurrent with US 40/I-70 from I-75 to Columbus
*1960-1962 by itself on I-71 from State Route 95 to US 30 and US 224 to State Route 18, concurrent 1962-1966
*1961-1962 by itself on I-71 from Columbus to State Route 95 and US 30 to US 224, concurrent 1962-1966
*1960-1965 concurrent with State Route 18 from I-71 to I-77
*1960-1966 concurrent with US 21/I-77 from State Route 18 to Brecksville
*1964-1966 concurrent with US 21/I-77 from Brecksville to Cleveland
*1960-1964 concurrent with State Route 82 from Brecksville to Aurora
*1960-1964 concurrent with State Route 306 from Aurora to I-90
*1960-1962 concurrent with State Route 306 from I-90 to State Route 84
*1964-1966 concurrent with I-90 from State Route 14 to State Route 306
*1962-1966 concurrent with I-90 from State Route 306 to State Route 44
*pre-1962 by itself on I-90 from State Route 44 to Pennsylvania, concurrent 1962-1966
I find that a disambiguation page would be worthless as no one would put forth the nessesary effort to complete two separate pages. -Einstine85
:The article isn't exactly super-long, and it doesn't deal with radically different subjects.  I see no reason to split it.  Nyttend 20:00, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Some info from [http://pages.prodigy.net/john.simpson/highways/ohhwys.html]

message: Most of the 1961 SR-1 relies on conjecture. I found an article which explicitly states the phrase "Conneaut - Cincinnati freeway (Ohio Route 1)" – it was published on January 2, 1959 in Cleveland's The Plain Dealer – but unfortunately I don't have an account for their archives, so I can't as much retrieve the title of the article much less read it at this time. Mapsax (talk) 09:24, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source for 1961 section 

message: These two topics are pretty different, and both seem to have enough info to be splitted. I proposed that the article should be split to Ohio State Route 1 (1923–1927) and Ohio State Route 1 (1961–1965).—CycloneIsaac–E-Mail 23:01, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Support— since they're pretty much different highways, why not? Imzadi 1979 →  23:25, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

text: Support per Imzadi1979.  Barring that, if SR 1 became a different route each time, why not redirect to that one? –Fredddie™ 00:02, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

text: Support - Unrelated highways should be split. Dough4872 02:05, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

text: Support (and immediately merge the 1920s route to U.S. Route 40 in Ohio). --NE2 12:13, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split?
Talk:Value pluralism

message: Does Joseph Raz defend value pluralism? If so, the page should say that, rather than merely that he clarified it.
: Raz defends a particular sort of value pluralism in his contribution to this book, (The Practice of Value) --Christofurio 21:31, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Joseph Raz

message: There should probably be an entry on the concept of normative pluralism, which is what some secular governments have sought to impose on Christian parents and their children.  ADM (talk) 08:41, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed. The Neo-Calvinism article needs a lot of work as well. Ottre 08:55, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see how your comment about neo-Calvinism is relevant to topics surrounding the philosophy of pluralism. ADM (talk) 09:35, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Normative pluralism

message: Value monism currently redirects here. I suggest to generalize this article to cover both value pluralism and value monism. I also think merging with value system might be good.--Chealer (talk) 23:39, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Value monism 

message: In the first paragraph of the Context section, the last sentence is a jumbled word salad that makes no sense. Some sort of editing or typographical error. Here it is: “ Furthermore, moral decisions often take radical preferences cause people’s needs differ and leaves with varying rational calculus's that determine moral values attributed to the moral facts.” Delysiderata (talk) 15:04, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Messed up sentence makes no sense
Talk:Loop (music)

message: I removed the cleanup tag from November as there is no indication of how the article needs to be cleaned up. Hyacinth 12:00, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: Re: While repetition is used in the musics of all cultures the first musicians to use loops were electronic pioneers Pierre Henry, Edgard Varèse and Karlheinz Stockhausen.
When did Stockhausen use loops? In which pieces? — Tobias Bergemann (talk) 10:19, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stockhausen 

message: should probably have some mention of Steve Reich, particularily 'It's gonna rain'/'come out'  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.92.80.172 (talk) 00:43, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Steve Reich
Talk:Douleur, rhapsodie tsigane

message: This text is a complete analyze.--213.49.211.99 12:12, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Analysis

message: This really is a load of tripe. I have tried to wikify it but I'm not sure it was worth the effort. Is it a (very poor) translation? A sentence like
:"Not only that these two opposing (platonic) governesses revoke each other, they even mutually complement each other."
is not the least comprehensible in the article. What does it all mean?
Avalon 23:30, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Bullocks

message: This also seems to have been published in other languages under the titles Bol, ciganska rapsodija and/or Dukhalipe, rromani rapsodija. See, for example, https://books.google.co.uk/books/about/Bol_ciganska_rapsodija.html?id=cPq6oQEACAAJ&redir_esc=y
I'm really not sure this passes the notability test, though. — The Anome (talk) 23:21, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other titles
Talk:Leslie Hunter

message: There seems to be some difference of opinion as to whether Hunter was born in 1877 or 1879 (Googling reveals both years used). Also whether he died in Glasgow or London. --Stormie 12:30, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The majority of sources I have found suggest that he died in Glasgow, but I have seen some say London, and it is true that at the time he was spending most of his time in either London or Fife so, in that context, Glasgow seems a little unlikely. The problem is that a lot of sources are art gallery biographies and many of them seem to borrow off each other, so it would be easy for one person to get it wrong and then spread it. I am going to look for some more reliable sources.--KorruskiTalk 09:52, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Nice article. Well organized, well-written, and well-cited. Yworo (talk) 00:04, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nice article 

message: In "... by Alexander Reid of Reid & Lefevre ..."  Needs correcting.
Dendrotek 22:48, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong Reid linked to 
Talk:Specific dynamic action

message: The phrase "specific dynamic action (SDA)" is much more frequently used in the scientific literature than is TEF (see Steve Secor's 2009 review).  The article's name should be changed to reflect this.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.130.110.102 (talk) 12:02, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Terminology

message: This sentence doesn't really make sense to me:
"TEF has been described as the energy used in the distribution of nutrients and metabolic processes in the liver,[6] but a hepatectomized animal shows no signs of TEF"
Why "but"? Isn't the elimination of TEP what would be expected from hepatectomy if liver processes were responsible?Kyle MoJo (talk) 08:03, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Word missing? 
Talk:Michael Gazzaniga

message: I think one should add to the article that Gazzaniga co-coined the term cognitive neuroscience during the early days of the so-called cognitive revolution in psychology, but that he now prefers the term "the biology of mind".
:If this is correct, please feel free to add it.--Heida Maria 11:19, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled