lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Komi-Permyak Okrug

message: "After a referendum held in October of 2004, Permyakia was merged with Perm Oblast to form Perm Krai."
:Can somebody to write more about this referendum? The ethnic Permyaks were majority in this region and it is strange that people vote to abolish their autonomy. What kind of referendum was that? Was it on the regional level of Permyakia or on the country level of Russia? What were its results? Does somebody know this? PANONIAN (talk) 21:53, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The referendum was held both in Permyakia and Perm Oblast. The people of Permyakia voted for it because the economics of this region are rather weak, while Perm Oblast is more potent, and people of Perm Oblast' either didn't care or believed it is a good idea. After all the Krai as a whole may get some autonomy (by the way Permyakia never was an autonomy like e.g. Tatarstan is).  Grue  17:21, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I remember answering the question about the referendum in the past.  In fact, that discussion is available through my talk archives.  Hopefully it will be of interest to you.—Ëzhiki (ërinacëus amurënsis) • (yo?); 14:19, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hm, you wrote there that "Permyakia will still have a special status within new Perm Krai", so, if I understand correctly, Permyakia still exist as administrative unit, although it is no longer federal subject of Russia, but only subdivision of Perm Krai? If that is so, should we write new article about Permyakia describing its current political status? I understand that this article is about former Autonomnous District of Permyakia, but if it still exist as some kind of administrative unit, we should write that somewhere. PANONIAN (talk) 00:18, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, maybe we should not write new article, but we certainly should have something written here about current political status of Permyakia. PANONIAN (talk) 00:32, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: We definitely should; in fact, it was my intention since, well, December of 2005.—Ëzhiki (Igel Hérrisonovich Ïzhakoff) • (yo?); 12:08, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Referendum
Talk:Bidston railway station

message: I removed the comment that [the electrification to Wrexham] "will be debated on 26th June 2006".  Who is going to debate it (e.g. Parliament, the Welsh Assembly, the users' group, or a couple of people in a pub)?  Also, this will go out of date very quickly (e.g. in two days time).  It would be better if after this debate (whatever it is), its outcome is described here.  --RFBailey 21:56, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Debate
Talk:Harlan, Iowa

message: The only source for his being a resident of this town comes from his article and I could find no other independent source. If you check out this edit, which happened to create Kaufman's article, you'll note the source for his personal history and where he was born etc was based on a personal interview.(Which by the way had him born in Harlan, Iowa but Baseball Reference says Kaufman was born in Omaha, Nebraska]] That's WP:OR and I have edited it out of his article and removed Kaufman's name from this article since I could find no WP:RS that says he ever lived here....William 13:05, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The removal of Curt Kaufman from notable people
Talk:Samuel Seabury

message: This article is somewhat contradicting itself concerning whether Seabury was instrumental in including the Scottish Communion rite in the 1789 prayer book. Someone added an alternate theory that it was William White, not Seabury, who pushed for its inclusion. It's OK to present different points of view, but the article shouldn't read as if it is saying two opposing views are both factually true. But someone other than I should do that. InkQuill 21:18, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seabury and the Scottish eucharistic rite
Talk:Samuel Provoost

message: :Before I start tagging this article,or attempting to work on it, is there an active editor watching it?
*The lead needs to be broken down to conform to Wikipedia policy for one thing so I thought I would inquire. Otr500 (talk) 13:33, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article issues 

message: First, I will add some information to the Introduction section.
[That he was an American Clergy man, switch the order of his titles and add that he was possibly the second.]
Next, I will revise/edit the History section to include more information.
[I added in the name of his parents, included that their was confusion over to exactly when he was born, and included that he was of a Huguenot family. I added that he was a linguist, that he achieved his status as a decan and when he married. I added when he went back to America, that he received the degree of Doctor of the Divine, and that he was elected Chaplain of the Senate of the U.S.. I also made it known that he had health issues and what he died of. I made many revisions to this article as well.]
Last I will add to the references and external links.
[I added my sources to the external links section.]
Abrown61 (talk) 18:24, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outline for revisions 

message: These are sources that I have used to improve the quality of the article
Chorley, E. C., "Samuel Provoost: First Bishop of New York" "Project Canterbury" 2010
Sprague, William B., "Rt Rev. Samuel Provoost" "Project Canterbury" 2008
Wilson, James G., "A Sketch of the First Bishop of New York" "Project Canterbury" 2008 
 "Samuel Provoost; American Clergyman" "Encyclopedia Brittanica" 
Abrown61 (talk) 17:41, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: Are you sure about his Quebec ancestors ? It seems quite unlikely that as huguenots they would settle in what was then New France. Before 1760, the colony was very strictly catholic and definitely not a destination of choice for huguenots. Do you have more information ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mtrepanier (talk • contribs) 20:29, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quebec 

message: Was he possibly the second bishop in The Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America, or possibly the second Presiding Bishop? Regardless, I don't see a reference for either claim. Can someone better acquainted help with this? Trumblej1986 (talk) 20:54, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possibly the Second?
Talk:Max Clifford

message: Does anyone know that Max Clifford's last public appearance was when he was let out of prison to attend his brother Bernard's funeral at the North East Surrey Crematorium on 18th August 2014?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.69.56.206 (talk) 08:06, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: It's covered here but it doesn't say that it was his last public appearance. This may well be true, but it leads to a problem with WP:OR.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 08:10, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I think i've found it:  It says: "The Ministry of Justice today announced that Clifford (pictured in a prison van as he left his brother's funeral at the North East Surrey Crematorium - his last public appearance) has died". So, can anyone please add this to ? That would be much appreciated IMO.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.69.56.206 (talk • contribs) 05:56, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

text: It's in the WP:DAILYMAIL so it couldn't be used as a cite. There seems little doubt that this was his last appearance in public, though.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 07:52, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Max Clifford's last public appearance at his brother Bernard's funeral 

message: However, on 2 April 2019 the Court of Appeal rejected his appeal.
:He had died in December 2017. Valetude (talk) 22:11, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I updated this for the sake of clarity.LM2000 (talk) 01:40, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates
Talk:NERC Data Centres

message: Text says eight centres but only seven listed?  RupertB 22:14, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

message: I've just added Reference and External Links sections which may help article to improve against noted issues in time and help wikify the article.
This might be a candidate for merging into Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) however given the likely effort to do this and possible disruption and undue weight in that article things are better left as is at the moment.
I confess to never understanding politics and particularly why this article is under Politics of the United Kingdom whough I could understand why Natural Environment Research Council is within scope of politics.
09:07, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Improvement
Talk:Tanoshimi

message: Have set up the new article. Feel free to add to it. Butch-cassidy 15:06, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: New Article

message: The link to reference #4 is broken and should be fixed by someone. 
--Nimoria (talk) 04:02, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken reference
Template talk:Volkswagen (Europe) timeline 1980 to date

message: VW Golf IV is still being manufactured in Brazil. This should be reflected here, but I don't know how to edit tables. Can someone do it?--Lenilucho 22:22, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Try looking in the :Template:Volkswagen (South America) timeline 1980 to date ;-/ -- Teutonic_Tamer (talk to Teutonic_Tamer) 10:22, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong Golf IV date

message: I just undid a previous edit by an unregistered user who added in a "VW Fusca" supposedly produced/sold from 1990 to present. I have never heard of such a vehicle and the added link went straight to the Beetle, but just in case, has anyone else heard of such a vehicle? - Bell'Orso (talk) 00:45, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Basic research, including the Beetle article itself, shows that Fusca is what the Beetle is/was called in Brazil. Of course, that doesn't apply to this Europe timeline, so you were right to revert it. --Vossanova o< 20:16, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, I did note that the Beetle was called "Fusca" in South America when checking up on this, probably should have noted that. So just to clarify, the Wikipedia page on the Beetle states that European production ceased in 1978, and European sales of cars produced in Mexico ceased in 1985 and neither production nor sale of the Beetle was ever resumed in Europe. My question was, is that correct? And was there ever a Volkswagen car that was produced and/or sold in Europe as the "VW Fusca"? Though from what you are saying I presume the answer to my first question is "yes", and to my second question the answer is "no". - Bell'Orso (talk) 07:34, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: VW Fusca

message: Dear Vossanova, thanks for adding some explanation to your edits: it's always helpful. I hope we can find concensus on whether a legend is part of the scope of this kind of car templates. I think manufacture/development info is key here because it shows what "DNA" different VW models have, despite all of them being sold at European dealerships. In life in general and when using Wikipedia, I like to follow the KISS (Keep IT Short & Simple) priciple as well, the use of a legend with some colours could fit well in this. Looking forward to collaborating in this. KatVanHuis (talk) 10:20, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legend
Talk:Claudio Caniggia

message: Hello. The correct format is [ˈklauðjo kaˈnixja, -niʝa]. LoveVanPersie (talk) 18:26, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The IPA format 
Talk:TNA Hard Justice 2006

message: the six side of steel is suppose to take place at these ppv
If you go to tnawrestling.com, you can see the matches that I have added. So let my matches stand!
-72.192.2.84
I did, if you look at my edit you will see I changed it back. Also, I think you meant to say "my changes" not "my matches". TJ Spyke 04:45, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

message: In my personal opinion, I think vs. makes it easier to read because it is more familiar. It also doesn't take as long to type lol--Yugioh73036 20:21, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: vs. or versus
Talk:American Idiot EP

message: Why is this not a single?! The artical even says it's self that an EP consists of 15-30 minutes of music, with four to eight tracks, whereas this consists of three tracks, (One of which was a major hit for Green Day, and another two that could easily be considered B-Sides) and clocks in at under 10 minutes! So tell me, why is this considered to be an EP? Underwater 14:08, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *For no other reason than that it is called an EP. Also, were it a single, it would be the single for the song American Idiot, right? Well, if I remember right there already was a single for that song, so... yeah. --Brandt Luke Zorn 02:41, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

message: I closed the AfD discussion for this article today, and a bit of explanation and direction is in order. It was decided, based on available sources from Amazon.com and the band's website, that the subject of this article isn't an EP at all, but instead is the "American Idiot" single. 
The consensus was to remove the 'EP' bits and merge the remaining content into the American Idiot (song) article. I leave it to knowledgeable fans to move the content; if help is needed doing the actual merge of the pages once the content has been moved, let me know and I'll take care of it. AfD has a huge backlog, and we're working hard to clear it. Thanks. KrakatoaKatie 09:03, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge into [[American Idiot (song)]]
Talk:Catherine McCormack

message: Probably the most beautiful actress around Pliny 23:05, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Pretty

message: Born 1/1/1972 in Hampshire according to most sources. But according to  she was born in 4/1972 (and her middle name is Jane) and according to  she was born in Surrey. The BFI database also supports this info. Crisso (talk) 01:44, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: This] article from whatsonstage.com confirms this too so I've corrected the article accordingly. Crisso (talk) 09:25, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Birth Info

message: catherine played in a movie called armadillo, that is correct, but not the movie (with same name) the link refers to. she played in a movie based on w. boyd's novel.
i'd suggest to cancel the 'link-function', as the link is wrong.
114.245.164.119 (talk) 09:04, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  link to movie 
Talk:Alain Johannes

message: Hear it claims she was a founding member of 'What Is This?' but on the article for the band it says she joined later. Which is correct? Stratpod 20:15, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Claims she was a founding member

message: Re: edit dated 24/06/2006
The liner notes for Songs For The Deaf do state that Hanging Tree was "written by Alain Johannes (Channel This Music/ASCAP) and Josh Homme".
Hanging Tree first appeared on Desert Sessions 7 & 8, Johannes played "All Guitars" on this version. 
--Beve 23:06, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Hanging Tree

message: As a producer and multi-instrumentalist, Alain Johannes is known for his large collection of instruments. I agree that the well-researched section about his instruments needed to be removed as that is only peripherally related to his fame, BUT I believe there may be a reason to one day put it back in (or part of it). That’s because Johannes also collaborates in development with luthiers and pedal F/X makers, so this is an area to watch for significance of that role.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Denstat (talk • contribs) 16:27, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: This long list of instruments and pedals played, as well as Johannes' influence on instrument and pedal development, as well as his gear choice influence on other artists, can be found under the edit by Klow dated January 21, 2022. Denstat (talk) 21:38, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Instruments and Equipment
Talk:Legal science

message: Wikified as part of the wikification drive.  KarenAnn 23:06, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Centre Party (Jersey)

message: Centre Party supporters are requested to refrain from either deleting or vandalising references and links to the JDA. We would like to be in a position to show you the same respect.
::::David Rotherham, JDA Secretary.
:Reversing the spin is not undoing vandalism. However replacing polite comment with obscenity that you are rightly ashamed to put your name to is doing vandalism. --Daverotherham 11:21, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Politics of Jersey

message: Have removed text here so it can be worked on for encyclopaedic character -
:In the case McGonnell vs. United Kingdom the European Court of Human Rights ruled this arrangement as in contravention of the convention. Whilst steps have been taken to ensure that no further cases can be bought before the European Court with the introduction of Royal Commissioners to sit on cases in which the Bailiff or Deputy Bailiff have presided as speaker, the current Bailiff Sir Phillip Bailhache himself recognises that it is preferable to remove the Bailiff from the States Chamber rather than from his position as Chief Judge. 
It ought to be made clear for the uninitiated that the ECHR has not ruled on the position of Bailiff in Jersey - the ruling applied to the Bailiff's position in Guernsey, which is (and was) different. The reference is misleading without the context. Perhaps a section on the evolution of the historical rôle of Bailiff would provide encyclopaedic context, without sounding like part of a campaign document? (Personally, I'm all in favour of having an elected President of the States). Man vyi 05:50, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Position of Bailiff
Talk:Końskowola

message: It's important that this article include details of the forces who liberated the area. With only my rudimentary Polish, I surmised that the Bataliony Chłopskie was involved, but more complete information would need to be translated into English. I'm watching this page and will see to its editing once the new material is incorporated. -- Thanks, Deborahjay 23:15, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I'll try. We must link liberation with Akcja Burza (Operation Tempest) -  plan to seize control of cities and areas where German forces were preparing their defenses against the Soviet Red Army, so that Polish underground civil authorities could take power before the arrival of the Soviets. Last german troop (motorized), had an order to destroy village by burn it. When they start July 25, 1944, small flexible group polish of Armia Krajowa Home Army attacked. During the battle, groups of another resistance Bataliony Chłopskie was alarmed and involved. In last, soviet Red Army entered into the village. Bocianski 23:47, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Details of July 1944 liberation
Talk:Quatermass 2

message: In the Penguin Encyclopaedia of Horror and the Supernatural, Kim Newman notes that Quatermass II is "a specific attack on the Conservative government of the time, down to the inclusion of several characters obviously based on real political figures." It might be interesting if someone could elaborate on this - any thoughts? PhilipC 23:23, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If you're still around and you've got the source, why not add this yourself and cite it? Cheers, Ian Rose 10:38, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't think it was a particularly informative thing to say, but I've put it in now. Thanks. PhilipC 10:47, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Political satire

message: I've removed this bit for now because it needs a source to support it. It sounds too much like someone's personal opinion. 
Many erroneously believe the film to be the first film in cinematic history to have a '2' in its title to designate it as a sequel to the original; however, this is not correct. The '2' in the title refers not to the film as the second in the series, but to Quatermass's second attempt at a space rocket. (The film that has the distinction of being the first to use a '2' in its title to designate itself as a sequel is The Godfather, Part II in 1974.)
: Technically this is true - there is a Quatermass 2 rocket in the plot, analogous to the German V-2 - but I'm sure it has a double meaning. More to the point, this article calls the film Quatermass 2 but the UK theatrical poster right there on the page calls it Quatermass II. Which is correct? 80.189.208.115 (talk) 18:59, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Title
Talk:Miss West Virginia USA

message: The AP obit for Patsy Ramsey (mother of JonBenét Ramsey) says Patsy "was born in Parkersburg, W.Va., on Dec. 29, 1956. She was crowned Miss West Virginia in 1977.". I see we list a (redlink) Pat Brown, so I think we should probably make that link point to Patsy (who is a redirect to her daughter, but who should probably have her own article). -- Finlay McWalter | Talk 23:27, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Wrong competition. This page is for Miss West Virginia USA (feeding into the Miss USA contest), Patsy Ramsey was Miss West Virginia (which feeds into Miss America). As yet there is no Miss West Virginia page (I'm currently working on all the Miss America state pages) but I'll try and get it up asap. Patsy's name when she won the pageant was "Patricia Ann Paugh" and her sister was "Pamela Ellen Paugh" -- PageantUpdater • talk | contribs | esperanza 00:04, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Patsy Ramsey
Talk:Kate Maberly

message: Hey guys, I'm Kate Maberly's Assistant Publicist and every edit I have made is correct, with correct citations, and it continues to get flagged.  What specifically must change? Anything that can be changed specifically will be done so immediately.    — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jlewis1122 (talk • contribs) 15:28, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: What must change
Talk:Battlefield, Shropshire

message: I merged the content of Battlefield Business Park (albeit a version I'd removed NPOV and corrected grammatically) into Battlefield, Shropshire (this article) simply because I couldn't see it expanding (after trying to find material for expansion on Google, I gave in!).
EvocativeIntrigue TALK | EMAIL 23:45, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "after trying to find material for expansion on Google, I gave in!" - maybe you searched for Battlefield Business Park, which doesn't exist, instead of Battlefield Enterprise Park?? David 14:25, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger
Talk:L.A. Matheson Secondary School

message: This article looks much better now it is cleaned up, I am going to give it Start / Low. Some pictures and further expansion and references are the key to improving this article further. Camaron1 | Chris 19:19, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This article does not satisfy WP:NOTE. Not every elementary school belongs on wikipedia. That's what websites, facebook, etc are for. Epthorn 14:40, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:Francis Adam Goodman

message: Thank you, Bkonrad, for the tweaks you made to this page.  I was unaware that the biography I had quoted from was available online, as I typed it in from a photocopy of the relevent page I received from my congresswoman several years ago.  Nice work!  It is appreciated!  -SHLAMA 00:03, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Thanks
Talk:Jacob Luitjens

message: Thanks for the translation, Bakabaka. I was the one who requested it . When I have some time I will try to write an article on Canada's War Crimes Program  .
By the way, it is incorrect to say that Luitjens was "extradited" to the Netherlands. There was no legal way to extradite him, because the particular crime he had been convicted of was not an extraditable offence under the extradition treaty between Canada and the Netherlands. If the nl wiki article uses the term "extradited" it should be edited. --Mathew5000 00:15, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No probs, Mathew, anytime. I did a more or less literal translation of the Dutch article, they indeed use the term 'uitleveren', which means as much as 'extradition' for afaik. I'm not that well-versed in legal terms, though, but I will add a comment about it to the Dutch talk page, linking this place. The peepz taking care of the Dutch Wiki can then fight over it themselves :) -- Bakabaka 00:22, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thanks 