lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Zapp (band)

message: vocoders are not the same thing as talkboxes.
I concur. From the video's i've just watched, it would seem that Roger Troutman uses keyboards plugged into talkboxes, not vocoders.
Looks like something just copied parts of this article from allmusic.com
Wathiik 17:41, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I noticed that my discog references were not good as they are user submitted info, changed that and replaced with some hopefully more reliable sources. A couple still remain and I'll be working on that, the one source can remain in my opinion regarding Roger Troutman's first recordings as it has photographic evidence of the band's name and track listing. Also, please stop changing the book's author from 'Rickey' to 'Ricky'. the author of the book is credited clearly as 'Rickey'. Thanks. Kaleidoscopic God (talk) 19:50, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: If you have images of the records, you can cite the album as a source opposed to citing discogs. Andrzejbanas (talk) 19:52, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Author name(s) and citation clean up
Talk:Group of Seven (artists)

message: WHAT 9000!?!? There's No way that could be right!
does anyone know how many pictures the Mc Michael gallery actually has?
--Malco 141.117.152.214 (talk) 07:50, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: That doesn't mean 9000 pieces from the Group of Seven, it means in total...it's just poorly written and not really relevant here. Adam Bishop (talk) 17:02, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No, I checked the history, The number should be 6000, it was vandalized on 14:00, 15 January 2010 by Davisloe1. I fixed it though. -- Malco141.117.152.214 (talk) 03:52, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: How about something like this:
After Samuel Gurney Cresswell and other painters on Royal Navy expeditions, these were the first artists of European descent who depicted the Arctic.Timmermann (talk) 11:44, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  the Arctic 

message: Somebody do a search at wikimedia Elinruby (talk) 22:55, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs images 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover)  Silikonz💬 20:02, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Group of Seven (artists) →  – Unnecessary disambiguation. The page  was renamed in August 2022 to G7, the name which the economic group is much more commonly known by. While the title now redirects to the moved article, "Group of Seven" as a name much more commonly refers to the Canadian artists' group. The redirect now at this title has no significant history and can be deleted. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 00:06, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 8 February 2023
Talk:Volpone

message: The little "1" link next to Wotton links to a site that doesn't exist anymore. Nandor1 (talk) 23:12, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The link to being based on Wotton 

message: Is the name "Sir Politic" or "Sir Politick"?  At present there are both. Wikiain (talk) 02:43, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Politic or Politick
Talk:Connecting tubule

message: Can anyone find a better picture?  The entry implies that the junctional tubule and collecting tubule are the same, but the figure has them labeled as different structures, with the JT more proximal and the CT more distal.  I realize that this is just semantics, but in communicating medical anatomy semantics can be a big issue...  Bobsagat (talk) 01:25, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Can
Talk:OutRun 2

message: Reffering to the section "Developing the game precipitated some changes for its developers, Sega-AM2, who had historically written their games using Unix systems. Writing for an Xbox-based system meant they had to adapt to the Microsoft Windows kernel." 
AM2 did not carry out conversion work to the game, it was done by a UK company called Sumo Digital, who had no prior gaming experience.
:I think that bit's referring to the development of the arcade version, not the home conversion. The game ran on the Chihiro arcade board, which is an Xbox-based system. MrPointless (talk) 12:18, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Sega-AM2

message: According to the OutRun 2006:Coast 2 Coast article, Outrun 2 is the SIXTH in the OutRun series, after Out Run/Turbo Outrun/OutRunners/Outrun Europa AND Outrun 2019.
This article says it's the Fifth, so which article is right?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lmcgregoruk (talk • contribs) 15:55, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fifth in series?
Talk:Yard (land)

message: I've always lived in a house which had both a garden and a yard. It would be common for the yard to be immediately adjacent to the doorway to the property, a garden would be a little further away - though it may be as little as a single pace from the door, across the yard and into the garden.
The Garden is made of soft earth where plants such as trees, grass or flowers may grow. 
The Yard is always covered with a hard surface where nothing will grow. The surface is typically covered with concrete, tarmac or paved with slabs of brick, stone or concrete.
::It may help understanding to put it like this: In Britain the Garden is all a household's open land and a Yard is everything that would NOT be called a Garden in the US. In the US a Yard is all a households open land and a Garden is everything that would not be called as Garden in the UK. Stub Mandrel (talk) 10:46, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  In British English. 

message: No mention or even a link to this? o0drogue0o 11:52, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  American prison yards 

message: does anyone else think this article might be a bit too exciting? kinda worries me  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tremendousswan (talk • contribs) 23:10, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Excitement levels
Talk:Mahl language

message: This article is new, but is already a bit of a mess. It did have images of the two alphabets laid out across the page. I've reduced them to a reasonable size, but this makes the point that there is no accompanying text. Spelling and grammar are awkward in places too. The article needs some work done on its content and layout. --Gareth Hughes 13:34, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And the problem is that the article seems to be rather on Dhivehi than on the dialect of that language called "Mahl". Thus, we get a lot of redundancies becasuse the main article gives all that info anyway. This article here should concentrate on the special characteristics of Mahl and its history as the only dialect of Dhivehi spoken outside the Maldives. Krankman 09:50, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean-up

message: Mahl spoken in Maliku (Minicoy), India is not different from the standard Divehi. The Addu, Moloki and Huvadu dialects of Divehi are more different from standard Divehi than Mahl. so why not we change the name like this Divehi (Mahl) language. Manikfan (talk) 11:57, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Move to Divehi (Mahl) language
Talk:Anne Northup

message: We got slammed due to vandalism in this article. --Kizor 13:37, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed - guys if you want to include the Chandra Levy thing, you really should post a credible link to say the least. As a rule of thumb, unproven criminal allegations shouldnt be in a bio, if they must be due to the publicity of the allegation, then both sides of the allagation should be posted. Bachs 16:33, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: My Spidey-sense tells me this was just a plant so a C-J writer could write an article.  Beyond that, I don't see anything newsworthy about any Wikipedia article containing factual errors--that's like having stories about people finding flies in their soup. — Stevie is the man! Talk | Work 21:34, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Congratufrickinlations.

message: I just reverted a lot of new content apparently added by the Northup campaign as much of it was non-neutral, self-congratulatory and unsourced.  If anyone wants to re-add the content in an NPOV manner (and source it), that would be fine. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 22:08, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Reverted campaign additions

message: I fixed the tenses of Northrup's congressional service details. So like; 'was' congresswoman instead of 'is' congresswoman. etc. prunepower 10:46, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Fixes
Talk:Jack Carver

message: Maybe should have infobox?
:Sure, that might make things look a little more "official". -albrozdude 23:38, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox? 

message: Are the two games part of the same story, or is Instincts a retelling of the story?  Is Jack former Navy or Marines? -Tenfour 19:52, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think the original Far Cry and FCI are supposed to be set in the same world. FCI is less of a sequel and more of a remake for the Xbox. As for Jack, I believe the official materials say he is former Navy, at least in FCI. -albrozdude 06:42, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  same character in both 
Talk:John Honeyman

message: What kind of information did Honeyman obtain?   The main article could be improved by discussing the information, even if it is speculative.   I would think that both troop count, and the extent of the meat supply, was extremely relevant to Honeyman's role as a butcher.   216.99.198.11 (talk) 19:58, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nature of Information obtained 

message: I tried to insert a reference 
http://www.mccord-museum.qc.ca/scripts/viewobject.php?Lang=2§ion=false&a
ccessnumber=M2003.145.7
to be a footnote, but it insisted on being inserted as a numbered list, at that point, consuming the remainder of the article.  None of the characters are in the list requiring percent encoding at wiki/Help:Footnotes.  it works fine here.  I have no idea why it doesn't work in the main article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.79.7.57 (talk) 21:38, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  La Morte de Wolfe 
Talk:Ivan the Young

message: My proposal? What proposal? I just changed Stefan cel Mare to Stephen III of Moldavia and I added that Elena was a Moldavian princess. The rest of the info was already there. --Candide, or Optimism 14:06, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: So what's the point of your changes? How do they improve the article? --Ghirla | talk 14:11, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It was agreed that we use that name version of Ştefan cel Mare (see the article talkpage). In addition to that, I thought it would be good to say that the princess was Moldavian. You usually mention that in articles. King X married a Princess X of whatever. --Candide, or Optimism 14:14, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is said that she was "of Moldova". Is that not enough? --Ghirla | talk 14:22, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I forgot to remove that part. The English name for the principality is Moldavia, so to not confuse with Republic of Moldova. Moldova should be replaced with Moldavia. --Candide, or Optimism 14:26, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, I see the agenda behind your edits now. Let's replace "Moldova" with "Moldavia" then. No need to repeat the toponym several times in one sentence. --Ghirla | talk 14:27, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, done. And agenda or not, it's true: the English name for the principality is Moldavia. --Candide, or Optimism 14:30, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  So is the Russian name :) --Ghirla | talk 14:34, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Elena
Talk:Ars Goetia

message: This entry has a new category added to it almost weekly and the latest is Abrahamic texts.  I have listed the definition given by the creator of the category below:
Abrahamic Texts[]
Abrahamic texts are religious texts that overlap multiple Abrahamic religions, and therefore usually precede, either the division of Christianity and Judaism, or the birth of Islam in the 7th century.
I fail to see how this fits into any areas of this definition.  It does overlap Christian and Judaic terminology but it first appears  7 centuries after the arrival of Islam and at least 12 centuries after the division of Christianity and Judaism.  Whatever the influence of these two religions on the text I do not see how it would be considered religious by any of them.  It places it along with the entire Lesser Key in the same category as the Torah and Heptateuch and there is clearly no shared thread between them. If the author can give a single Christian authority who recognizes the text as of a religious nature or even non-heretical I would reconsider.  I will allow the author to leave some reason for the additions or I will change them in the next few days--Chaoscrowley 14:07, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too many categories 

message: The 'howling' of the title is believed to refer to the incantations made by the conjuror.
This statement in the second paragraph no longer makes sense.  There was a time when the opening sentence of the article claimed that "Ars Goetia" translates as "the howling art", but fortunately that's long since changed.  Does anyone take issue with striking the sentence from the second paragraph? Canonblack 22:55, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Howling?
Talk:Young Boys Inc.

message: I used the Small Seo Tools plagiarism checker, located here: Small Seo Tools and found that 29% of the article is plagiarized. I am guessing the original author did not know how to paraphrase or label direct quotes. Also of concern is that many of the exact matches came from websites that are not cited. The ones I followed up on were of dubious credibility.
I had thought my first task would be to wordsmith the article to make it more coherent, and correct usage and grammatical errors. But instead I will have to remove any instances of plagiarism and then do my editing and revision. I will also make sure there are appropriate sources and that they are cited. 
PaigeAndAHalf (talk) 07:55, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagiarism check 

message: i will post up much information about them soon and there comeback attempts.
*When you do, please make sure it is sourced.  I'm tagging the article until then.--Isotope23 20:26, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Now has a stub there with appropriate link.  Per copyvio policy, I am asking that this temp page replace the current disclaimer.  This has been left dysfunctional for nearly a month.  Let's get back to writing an encyclopedia.  Jtmichcock 20:35, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Temp Page
Talk:Chronicon Pictum

message: Is this the same thing that is sometimes called "Kepes Kronika" ? --ፈቃደ (ውይይት) 14:15, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Is this the same thing?

message: This chronicle is nearly impossible to be found as a re-edition, and it is heavily guarded by the OSZK. Someone recently tried to make it publicly available (after acquiring the necessary permissions), but all they got was legal harassment. Conspiracy theories, anyone?
Does this deserve a mention in the article? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by V. Szabolcs (talk • contribs) 17:59, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  A controversy? 

message: It seems that at least based on various images of the Battle of Posada, there are multiple medieval editions of this book. See :commons:File talk:Viennese Illuminated Chronicle Posada.jpg#Medieval book edition and :commons:User talk:Csanády#Battle of Posada - Medieval book editions. The Chronica Hungarorum article talks about different variants!  I found a copy myself at the National Museum of the Union in Alba Iulia last fall. But that doesn't look like a medieval copy. Anyone knows more? --Codrin.B (talk) 22:18, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multiple editions? 

message: The two article are not large and clear enough to both exist. I think the content from Chronica Hungarorum should be merged to Chronicon Pictum. Also I think the different editions and names like Chronica Hungarorum, Buda Chronicle, Chronicon Pictum should be clarified. If the merged article grows enough and once different editions and names are clarified and deemed as distinct works, they should naturally grow into specific articles. Right now I find it very confusing.Codrin.B (talk) 14:28, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi. I'm traducing from English to French the biographies of medieval Hungarian kings and these articles frequently refer to the Chronicon Pictum, the Chronica Hungarorum and other Hungarian chronicles. On fr.wikipedia.org Chronicon Pictum redirects to Chronica Hungarorum. I agree with Codrin.B, this is very confusing, but it may be difficult to clarify because Middle Ages are a grey area. Maybe Borsoka, who wrote the aforesaid articles about Hungarian kings, could enlighten us. Regards, Red Maze (talk) 07:15, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the merger of the two articles would be very confusing. Chronica Hungarorum is the name of a medieval literary tradition of the history of the Hungarian people and Hungary. It was recorded in many phases from the 1070s, and it has been preserved in several manuscripts (including Chronicon Pictum, Chronicon Budense). Borsoka (talk) 04:55, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose:  It now seems that the articles have been improved and expanded, such that having them separate is clearer; the Chronicon Pictum is independently notable. Klbrain (talk) 11:48, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from Chronica Hungarorum
Talk:Hit the Deck (musical)

message: Can anyone add a summary of this musical's story?  -- Ssilvers (talk) 05:31, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot summary?
Talk:Alfa Romeo 145 and 146

message: I have merged back here all content from Alfa Romeo 146. Besides the fact that that article was almost entirely a duplicate of this one, there is no reason to keep separate articles for two body styles of the same car just because they happen to have been given different names. – Cloverleaf II (talk) 09:38, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Alfa Romeo 146 content merger
Talk:Event driven programming language

message: Im just a beginner in programmming, so i would like the geniuses of these industry to enlighten me. I would really appreciate it if one of you could tell me the pro and cons of event driven programming, object oriented programming.
: Short answer: the Wikipedia is not a discussion forum. Go to the relevant Usenet groups, or something. JöG 20:26, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

message: This article does not make sense.
I would expect it to define a sub-set of programming language,
but it nicely evades the language part entirely, talking about
the event-driven programming paradigm in general instead.
After reading it, I'm not even sure event-driven programming languages exist.
JöG 20:32, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Purpose of this article?

message: As noted by others, this did not describe a programming language, but rather a paradigm (which can be used in most programming languages).  I have moved all the content into Event-driven programming. Nate 16:19, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved to Event-driven programming
Talk:Roman litigation

message: I've added a few things about litigation to the main roman law article.
Eulen 14:25, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Under Legis Actiones, the article states that the plaintiff lays down a wager, which then links to a disambiguation page for which there is no useful choice.  Perhaps a page about this kind of wager is in order?  Brian Sayrs 17:01, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, David, for handling the issue! Brian Sayrs 22:54, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wager 

message: See the discussion at Talk:senatusconsultum Macedonianum. modify 18:19, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging in ''[[senatusconsultum Macedonianum]]''
Talk:Spangles (sweets)

message: There was a brief reintroduction at some point (early 1990s?) - I remember buying them in Woolworths. I can't remember how long they lasted - only a year or two at most, I think; they were just too expensive for a pretty small tube. 217.33.74.20 14:29, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I also remember these in the early-mid 1990s - I only remember ever seeing them in Woolworths too. They were definately still available in 1993, if not 1994 or even later. --Zilog Jones 23:03, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a little misleading to say they were produced 'up until the mid-1990s' in the intro, then, if they'd been gone for years then briefly reappeared. Anyone know when they originally stopped? Sometime in the 80s? BillyH 03:03, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone's updated it to say they stopped in the early 80s. Ty. BillyH 17:18, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

message: The external link, "Spangles soon to be available here", links to a page that tells us this product is discontinued. In its current state the link serves no other purpose as a plug for a site selling other old confectionery, but not this particular item.  SideIron (talk) 20:33, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  External link to commercial site 

message: The picture of the wrapper from 1974 is interesting as it shows a price of 2p printed on the wrapper but there's a retailer price label showing 2 1/2p. This probably would not be allowed today. Stub Mandrel (talk) 10:58, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: There was massive inflation in double figures around 1974-1981.  Retail prices increased frequently.  IIRC, it soon became law that, when a product had two prices the retailer was supposed to sell it at the lower price.  Retailers were required to remove old price labels before putting new ones on, which meant a huge increase in workload.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.196.161.203 (talk) 23:18, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Dodgy Pricing
Talk:Dendrogram

message: The graphics of this page are very misleading
* classical dendrograms are oriented from the left to the right (top down trees can be found but are less frequent).
* in a dendrogram, there is a total order between the nodes. Two nodes are never on the same level (contrary to the graphic illustration).
--Joannes Vermorel 14:29, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I introduced pictures with less ambiguous dendrograms, including ones orientated from left to right, from top to bottom, and both (see the heatmap). I hope this will help illustrating the variety of dendrograms, including phylogenetic trees. Manudouz (talk) 07:18, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Anyone knows the difference? Would it be important to add to the article? Khullah (talk) 03:00, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dendogram vs Cladogram 

message: This article hasn't been linked yet to the German version of it.
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hierarchische_Clusteranalyse#Dendrogramm
Anybody knows how to fix that?
--Moedn (talk) 14:38, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The link you mentioned actually points to a section of the German page about hierarchical clustering ('Hierarchische Clusteranalyse' → 'Dendrogramm'), not to a German page specifically dedicated to dendrograms. The page-to-page interlinking is therefore not possible. Manudouz (talk) 07:29, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  linking
Talk:John Yarmuth

message: Recently, I have tried to upload John Yarmuth's signature ((File:John Yarmuth Signature.jpg|thumb|John Yarmuth Signature)).  The problem is that I have found the image to be too big to properly fit into the Infobox (try to edit this image in and you will see what I mean).  However, this is the only image of his signature I could find (it came off his website).  Could somebody help me upload it?  Thanks. Firstclass306 (talk) 12:53, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  John Yarmuth's Signature  