lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Canadian Railroad Trilogy

message: The song is a timeless masterpiec of folk art. It's real culmination is at: 
the song of the future has been sung,
all the battles have been won, 
On the mountain tops we stand'
All the world at our command
We have opened up the soil,
With our tear drops and our toil,
A time when work was noble, creative, earth changing. A time when man was not as he has become...
A masterpiece of poesy  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wblakesx (talk • contribs) 05:41, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is no song by The Limeliters called this. They do have a "Civil War Medley" on the album mentioned, but it is 4 songs, not a trilogy, written by Shel Silverstein, Bob Gibson, and Irving Gordon. 
There is a song of that name by Gibson and Camp here, but it isn't attributed to The Limeliters. 2001:56A:FA85:3800:E437:677:1CAC:97E1 (talk) 06:33, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Civil War Trilogy
Talk:Cant del Barça

message: The article currently includes the lyrics of El Cant del Barça. I would think that the lyrics of a song are copyrighted and, according to Wikipedia policy, should therefore not be included in a Wikipedia article without permission. However, I don't know if in the case of the anthem of FC Barcelona this is different. CronopioFlotante (talk) 10:34, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Quite. Removed them today. --Richhoncho (talk) 19:27, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Again removed. SLBedit (talk) 01:10, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lyrics - copyright violation?
Talk:Canticle

message: The Section "Roman Catholic Church" has material sourced from the 1908 Catholic Encyclopaedia. Consequently, its description of the Old Testament Canticles used at Lauds is prior to the Pian reforms of 1911. The Canticles listed are no longer correct; they are now:
* Monday = Canticum David (1 Chron. 29:10-13);
* Tuesday = Canticum Tobiae (Tob 13:1-10);
* Wednesday = Canticum Judith (Judith 16:15-21) 
* Thursday = Canticum Jeremae (Jer 31:10-14) 
* Friday = Canticum Habacuc (Hab. 3:2-19)
* Saturday = Canticum Ecclesiastici (Eccl. 36:1-16)
* Sunday = Canticum trium puerorum (Dan. 3:57-88, 56)
Ramakesava, 1927hrs 27/07/2008  —Preceding undated comment was added at 18:28, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I put that in, but it is not quite correct. (I of course put it in in correct form, as far as I know.) What happened was that that the old Canticles, with some marginal exceptions (when a new feast was introduced in the meantime, or on a feria of ordinary time - and that was a rare bird to be sure), are still said when they used to be said - and more often, for the "rights" of penitential feriae to outrank feasts have been much increased. The new Canticles (which by the way do not have Habacuc on Friday, that would be the old one, but the Vere absconditus by Isaiah) "merely" (again with marginal exceptions) replace the "endless" repetition of the Canticum trium puerorum, which in 1910 was used for any Sunday, any feast whatsoever (!) if not outranked, any octave whatsoever, and any feria of Eastertide. - We simply have to keep in mind how many days are feasts - and thus at least potential exceptions to the neat "Sunday through Saturday normal week" we get presented in Breviary introductions and the like - on the Catholic calendar, be it that of 1910, 1962, or even (on a smaller scale) 1970 if we count memorials. The exception is more prominent than the "rule". We see this in two instances the pre-1911 Breviary: Psalm 118/119 seems to have been the "festive psalm" to use at any feast for the lesser hours; but as there are so many, the Breviary doesn't think it worth the bother to draw some psalms out of its hat for weekdays, and just puts it there for use in the lesser hours repeated every day (now no longer the case). On the other hand, it doesn't think it worth the bother to distinguish a penitential weekday from a normal weekday, as the latter are so rare, and just puts in Psalm 50/51 Miserere in every weekday. Of course both of that was changed in 1911, in the former by greatly restricting Psalm 118/119 to the Sundays and highest feasts.--2001:A61:260C:C01:99AA:E9C6:6E5A:EAC7 (talk) 09:48, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Canticle of the Sun

message: Also included 3 extra links which are relevant to my changes.
Hope you concur with these changes, Gerry246 (talk) 05:55, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Some extra links

message: The Alternate Versions section is a mess.  I am not sure I am musically qualified enough to improve it but it seems to me it is just becoming the equivalent of a link farm.  Some of the selections are given a huge, probably inproperly weighted treatment (i.e. Sofia Gubaidulina's version).  Other's may not be noteworthy enough, like the recent adding of the following sentence "The first recording of it by Chicago's Grant Park Orchestra and Chorus under Carlos Kalmar was released in June 2011." to me almost sounds like SPAM at the worst or unnotable at best.  Does anyone have any suggestions?Marauder40 (talk) 13:55, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternate Versions section 

message: Added a source on William Henry Draper. Not a truly scholarly source, but reputable. As this is the most common translation/paraphrase of the Canticle of the Sun in English, I believe this needed an external link for validation. First Wiki edit ever! Please be kind...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by D.a.drohan (talk • contribs) 01:30, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  William Henry Draper Source 

message: Below the poem, it's written "ka=perché", etc. Wouldn't it be more correct to compare Umbrian with Latin instead of modern Italian? It seems to me that "ka" is derived from the Latin word "qua", or some other related word, such as "quare". But I cannot prove it, so I haven't changed the article. 
--LPedro Machado (talk) 13:49, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ka = ? 

message: I don't think we should give prominence to one setting of it in a hatnote when several are mentioned. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:38, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hatnote 

message: Is this the common translation? The meaning in context seems more likely to be "for" e.g. "Praised be You, my Lord, for Sister Moon and the stars". Riffraff (talk) 16:10, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Per" as "through"?
Category talk:Nursery rhymes

message: Can this be added?
As listed for example at:
http://dragon.sleepdeprived.ca/songbook/songs5/S5_51.htm
Cuyocksol 21:02, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "There's a hole in my bucket" 

message: you didn't mention the nursery rhyme-
London's burning, 
London's burning,
Fetch the engines, 
Fetch the engines,
Fire! Fire!
Fire! Fire!
Pour on water,
Pour on Water
im sure that we used to sing this at school —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.145.242.58 (talk) 19:20, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: We sang it in school too, and the teacher translated it for us, since we were not expected to understand English. You can find it at nl:Brand_in_Mokum. HandigeHarry 17:30, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  what ever happened to "London's Burning"? 

message: I've added Round and round the garden, but does anyone know its origins or when it first appeared in print ? David Ruben  Talk  03:43, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Round and round the garden
Talk:Castles Made of Sand (song)

message: There is an error in the interpretation of the song laid out in the "Structure" section.  The writer says the ending of the song is "a happier event - an attempted suicide that ends as a miracle cure."  However, the lyrics heshe refers to read:
"She drew her wheelchair to the edge of the shore
And to her legs she smiled you wont hurt me no more
But then a sight shed never seen made her jump and say
Look a golden winged ship is passing my way
And it really didnt have to stop, it just kept on going...
And so castles made of sand slips into the sea, eventually"
which clearly indicates that the ship did not stop, and thus the girl remained in her unfortunate state.
Unless somebody objects, I'm going to correct the Structure section. Abidagus (talk) 21:33, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in structure section
Talk:Sandpiper

message: Just after I added a cladogram to the article I noticed that a preprint had been posted on BioRxiv on 16 July 2021:
*
The phylogeny in the new study differs mainly in the earlier branching. It uses more data, includes the missing genera and puts the imperial snipe in Chubbia. When the preprint is published in a refereed journal I'll update the cladogram.
See also:
*https://www.museum.lsu.edu/~Remsen/SACCprop546.html
*https://www.birdforum.net/threads/scolopaci.171100/page-2
- Aa77zz (talk) 19:03, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cladogram
Talk:Ohio State Route 14

message: See note at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ohio State Highways#Straight-Line Diagram legend. Mapsax (talk) 19:54, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Truck vs. Temporary

message: * If anyone is good at formatting tables, I noticed an error in the table at the point where OH-14 goes through Bedford.  There are some cells out of place.  If you can, please fix!  --DangApricot (talk) 20:25, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Junctions
Talk:Chanson

message: Why does chanteuse redirect here?
Shouldn't there be some explanation of the relationship of the word "chanteuse" to "chanson" in the body of the article? --Robotech_Master 04:42, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why chanteuse? 

message: This article would greatly benefit from an audio example.   — C M B J   04:24, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Example audio 

message: There is a discordance. The "Nouvelle chanson" section claims to be about what in France is called "chanson" or "chanson française" (meaning Édith Piaff, Trenet, Jacques Brel, Brassens or more modern artists like Dominique A, Alain Bashung or Miossec) but the main article of "Nouvelle chanson" (check the link which is proposed in the article) is about the "nouvelle scène française" so only artists from the 90s onwards. 
So if "Nouvelle chanson" is the equivalent in English for what in France is called "chanson" or "chanson française" the link should redirect to an article that actually talks about that and not only about "nouvelle scène française". I think there are two possible solutions, or another article is made talking about the "chanson française" or the "Nouvelle chanson" article is expanded.
In the other hand if "Nouvelle chanson" refers to the "nouvelle scène française" then this article ("Chanson") must be changed. There must be another section between "Modern chanson" and "Nouvelle chanson" that talks about the "chanson française" from the beginnings of the XXth century until the 90s and the contents of the "Nouvelle chanson" section must be changed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.123.62.16 (talk) 09:32, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nouvelle chanson 

message: This whole prissy & artsy-fartsy nonsense should be deleted, lest we begin to have hundreds of thousands of articles on English Wikipedia named with a word in a foreign language but describing only a subject that goes in completely under the English word for it. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 17:58, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Delete, me thinks

message: French native here, guys chanson just mean song... I was going to argue for deletion, but we do have an idiom for specifically french lyrical singing. Medias and the general public would use the term "Chanson francaise". I think it'd be better suited. 
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chanson_fran%C3%A7aise
--Ostream (talk) 19:32, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: French song in that case. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 13:11, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, probably. The article also has a gaping hole where coverage of the period of Jacques Brel, Charles Trenet et al would go (neither are mentioned, though Piaf is). Apart from pre-classical stuff, if "Chanson francaise" means anything at all to modern English-speakers, it is probably that. Johnbod (talk) 04:37, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renaming to "Chanson francaise"
Talk:O Cameroon, Cradle of Our Forefathers

message: Has anyone noticed that the English translation is completely different than the French lyrics? I think someone forgot to change the translation of the old lyrics that were changed in 1978... --79.177.107.190 (talk) 19:13, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think i know why it happened... it seems like someone just copied the translation from here and there was a mistake in the original site. Anyway - someone should fix that. How haven't anyone noticed so far? I saw it while translating the article to Hebrew, but there were some more Wikis that did it before I did... --79.177.107.190 (talk) 19:18, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No, there's no mistranslation. The English lyrics and French lyrics are completely different and always have been. — Dulcem (talk) 22:37, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Bad translation...
Talk:HaYehudim

message: This article, prior to changes made August 20 2006 was a terrible POV. I beg you guys - don't post your own feelings of the band as general facts. And a song's full lyrics certainly have no place in a band's article.
I am not a HaYehudim fan, but I've tried to write as much an imformative and objective article as possible. I urge fans of the band, and anybody with better knowledge of it, to improve the article. Thanks.
Ido50 19:04, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality

message: Low-importance? This is one of the most important bands in Israel. Edenc1 • Talk 09:32, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Israel 
Category talk:Law schools in New York (state)

message: Is there any way to change the subcategory "Law schools in New York City" to be listed under "N" for "New York City"? PreferenceSeries 19:04, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Think I got it (put in some pipes) PreferenceSeries 19:07, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Chariot (song)

message: Could there be a connection to merkabah mysticism (“merkabah” literally means chariot)? Given that Gavin DeGraw is half Jewish on his mother’s side, it seems possible. 63.231.141.132 (talk) 22:21, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Merkabah?
Talk:Prion (bird)

message: hey like i dunno how to use this, or any of you guys, but that's a horrible picture.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CC51:2B60:7CE8:D33C:B505:474C (talk) 03:03, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: *Eh, it is. Changed. Sabine's Sunbird  talk 04:04, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture
Talk:Britten's Children

message: Bridcut uses the term "paedocrat". This article labelled Britten as a paedophile. This is a highly charged term with several meanings. It has a very strict literal meaning of one one who is sexually attracted to children (which is undeniably true of Britten). It is also seen in contexts such as "he is a convicted paedophile" (seen in the The Times recently). Thus the term is used in the media, to mean a criminal act (which the book does not accuse Britten of performing). The book treads a very careful line (and the author has done a brilliant job in doing so): this article must respect that. Bluewave 19:06, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: P(a)edophile

message: This article as I found it contained spurious quotations (inaccurate), misleading juxtapositions (mentioning Eric Crozier in the middle of a paragraph on Harry Morris) and a very partial account of Britten's relationship with David Hemmings, totally avoiding what Hemmings himself had to say about the relationship which is clearly set out in Bridcut's book. Looking at the article's history, it seems to have been written mischievously by a now blocked editor who clearly had an agenda regarding homosexuality and underage boys. I have made a start at putting the article on something like factual rails, but hope other editors might continue this process. Alfietucker (talk) 09:31, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your cleanup work. When I myself found the article (after looking it up out of fleeting curiosity), I found the problem I described in this edit, which is the only reason the article is on my watchlist. Having never read the book, I didn't realise how problematic the article was. Graham87 15:25, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs cleaning up
Talk:Cherokee (Europe song)

message: can someone who has really heard this song explain the correct genre
and not by looking at the picture of the band - val hallen  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.254.17.70 (talk) 15:42, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: this song is not glam metal
Talk:Gadfly petrel

message: Can anyone tell me why the Herald Petrel is listed twice, with no explaination on the page? JohnCastle 22:54, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Herald Petrel has not been split per the SACC yet, and the Fea's Petrel has not been split per any major authority (the IOC is comtemplating). speednat (talk) 21:27, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Species
Talk:Cherry Pink (and Apple Blossom White)

message: Before being a French song, and then a hit by Perez Prado, it was a Spanish bolero  by a Spanish singer,  :en:Jorge Sepúlveda, in 1950, see :br:Cerezo rosa. The words of the Spaniard were just a bit modified, the rythm changed, but the tune is easy to recognize. Bianchi-Bihan (talk) 13:21, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I heard it now that the tunes almost are identical. Can you translate the article you refer to? Did Sepúlveda compose the melody? Best wishes Mbakkel2 talk 3:46, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
Category talk:Rock songs

message: Organized the subgenres into the Category:Rock songs by subgenre category. That should reduce the clutter a bit. Next up is to move the artist subcategories into a separate "Category:Rock songs by artist" category. --Hemlock Martinis 05:23, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Finished "Rock songs by artist". --Hemlock Martinis 06:48, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Mother Damnable

message: This colorful character sheds light on the early history of Seattle. From an economic standpoint, her enterprises helped accumulate money from sailors and lumbermen in Seattle, instead of other towns, which may be part of why Seattle's the major city on the sound instead of Everett or Olympia. (Of course, it's hard to say that for sure ...). And, beyond that, she's just plain colorful! -rewinn 19:13, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Starting article

message: There seems to be some earlier characters in England called "Mother Damnable" cf. Charles Lamb here http://books.google.com/books?id=j7kdAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA585&lpg=PA585&dq=mother+damnable&source=web&ots=yBU--fMKFX&sig=EjFypiQMG9C__uWr3n_r-V-oEDA&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=1&ct=result . May be worth a section sometime -rewinn (talk) 03:33, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Other Mother Damnables
Category talk:Scottish songs

message: Amazing Grace and the other classic traditional songs of Scotland should probably be in this category. --The Legendary  Sky Attacker 03:58, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amazing Grace 

message: And The Flower of Scotland. Is that not the National Anthem of Scotland? Very notable. --The Legendary  Sky Attacker 07:23, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Fly Away Home

message: I´ve deleted the link to the official site because it is no more, although there is an alternate page on sony, it´s just an advertising to buying the dvd and i think it´s biased and the same info can be found on imdb.{{subst:image source|Image:1800021804p.jpg)) Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 00:24, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: I've deleted

message: Was it special effects or the birds were really trained to follow the plane ? Also the camera work is awesome, sometimes we get a view of just above the goose. Jay 04:59, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: How was it done ?

message: The photo in the section "Production" is not of either aircraft from the movie (which were an Easy Riser biplane and a trike). Rather, it appears to be the Laziar ultralight used by the actual Bill Lishman, upon whom Jeff Daniels character is based. Thus, it really has nothing to do with an article about the film. --DOHC Holiday (talk) 16:58, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo of Aircraft 

message: Both are listed as being in this film, but are not listed on IMDb? --24.94.251.19 (talk) 22:02, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jim Varney and George Carlin 

message: Weather 174.233.0.126 (talk) 17:36, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weather
Talk:The Marionette and the Music Box

message: In order to meet the notability requirements for an album, the band must itself be notable.  The band's pages, however, do not mention any external media references to the band or its albums.  Nor has the band won any awards, been in rotation on a radio station, had any charted hits, or any of the multitude of possible notability requirements.  Therefore I conclude that this album is not notable, and should be deleted. Please see: Wikipedia:Notability (music). Jonemerson 22:09, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Sala gang

message: Some of the sections are a little short compared to the others and given the length of the chronological recollection, it would probably be a good idea to provide a condensed version.
I'm hoping to be able to flesh this out furher (specify sources more thoroughly), but the holiday is about to end and my life about to ensue, so I might not get to it all too soon. I wouldn't mind finding someone has beaten me to it, obviously. Suede 19:17, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  To do
Talk:Brandywine High School

message: tell us more! pics? Victuallers 09:20, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've made multiple edits to restructure the format and to attempt to change items to conform to Wikipedia's NPOV policy; however, there are several items which I've migrated to the "Current News" section that need to be attended to.  Wikipedia content should not be written in tabloid style, and it needs to be backed up with solid references.  I recognize that high school students will largely be contributing to the edits of this page, but I would encourage them as a fellow Brandywine alumnus (class of 1987) to try to follow Wikipedia standards. 
Currently, the article stands in need of a list of all athletics, clubs, and possibly courses available at the school.  The information presented in the "Current News" section should be backed up with an online citation, preferably from an official website of the school,the  district, or the local press.  Statements made by teachers constitute hearsay, not policy pronouncements, and are not admissible as proper citations without further documentation. Rcharman 19:19, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV and Format Edits 
Talk:Suzuki Sidekick

message: The picture labelled "Suzuki Sidekick" near the bottom of the page is actually a photo of a Sidekick Sport, as is the picture next to it, correctly labelled "Sidekick Sport". The Sport models have gray body cladding, and the regular Sidekickes do not.
:So fix it. The person who added the image has a history of poorly labelled and poor quality images.--Myk 03:52, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
Category talk:Songs written by Stephen Foster

message: I'm re-adding :Category:American folk songs. A lot of Foster's songs are so ubiquitous that they are regarded as folk songs today (e.g. "Oh Susanna", "Camptown Races", etc.). Even more so than many of the other artists represented in that category. Ibadibam (talk) 06:31, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The 'Songs written by...' categories do not go under genre categories, rather the artists' songs categories do eg. 'Category:Stephen Foster songs' though such a category does not exist; therefore I readded Category:American folk songs. Hiddenstranger (talk) 20:15, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Would it be appropriate to rename this category :Category:Stephen Foster songs to match the general naming scheme? Ibadibam (talk) 20:19, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  American folk songs category