lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:SBB-CFF-FFS Re 460

message: This locomotive is designed for 200 km/h operation. Being designed for 200 km/h operation implies (in Switzerland) that it has to go 230 km/h at some point, but that does not change the fact that it was designed and built for 200 km/h operation. The 230 km/h figure is mostly irrelevant except that there were a few tests done at that speed. --Kabelleger (talk) 11:05, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Top speed 

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:SBB Re 460 Schottikon alternate crop.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on September 26, 2014. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2014-09-26. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:15, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:SBB Re 460 Schottikon alternate crop.jpg]] to appear as POTD
Talk:Sheppard and Enoch Pratt Hospital

message: One of Sheppard Pratt's most difficult units was the Adult Neuropsychiatry Unit that was housed in the new building on hall 2F and held 12 patients at a time, in early 2012 this increased by 2 beds bringing the total bed amount to 14. It was started in 2008 and Dr. Robert Wisner-Carlson was the service chief. The unit was first ran by a group of staff pulled from other areas of the hospital who then had to learn the behaviors of patients with developmental disability's. Over the course of 3 years, the staff became known as the best team of staff in the hospital, with there ability to learn and come up with innovative ways to help the population. For a while things were good, however the unit struggled with financial obligations, due to the population who's insurance came from DDS, Medicare/ Medicaid. There were lots of patients who were admitted to the unit but their insurance would not cover them. Some patients became disposition problems and they stayed on the unit for months. This presented a problem for the unit and the hospital. The hospital suffered loss in revenue and the hospital could not afford to keep the unit open any longer, so in early February 2013 after the unit was open for 5 years, it was announced to the regular staff of the unit that the unit would be closed in March of 2013, this news was then publicly announced in April of 2013. Today, the Neuropsychiatry program is still running however there have been a few revisions due to the unit closing. It is really unfortunate that the unit had to be closed, and now some of the patients are not getting the quality of care they are expected to receive. With a Neuropsychiatry Track Program running only 4 patients are able to participate in the rehabilitation services that have been provided, however there are other patients who do qualify and would benefit from the program but are not able to participate due to legal restrictions. Sheppard Pratt Staff will continue to provide the best in services they can under the current circumstances.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.1.226.36 (talk) 19:22, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Adult Neuropsychiatry Unit 

message: part of a larger system, not separately notable  DGG ( talk ) 05:12, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Sheppard Pratt at Ellicott City]] 

message: Wikipedia is not here for advertisement purposes. This article needs to be written to reflect what the hospital has actually accomplished in the real of mental health rather than advertising itself. It also needs to reflect a neutral tone.  Businesses submit themselves to magazines all the time. Where is there any evidence that Shepard Pratt is anything other than a business? To find that evidence, you would have to ask the patients if they feel this is a good hospital. 2604:2D80:A48F:300:5D1E:F92D:2900:C690 (talk) 19:01, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reads like an advertisement and biased POV
Talk:Haarlem railway station

message: In Haarlem railway station#History I question the link to Charabanc in relation to a type of railway passenger car. I believe this description should be clarified or expanded in the reference article. Peter Horn User talk 14:38, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: A type of Passenger car (rail) Peter Horn User talk 16:01, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I created a section called Charabanc (rail) Peter Horn User talk 16:50, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Charabanc 

message: Haarlem's first railway station was in a different location than today's, in front of the Amsterdamse Poort, about one kilometer to the southeast. Shouldn't that station get its own entry? --Ilja.nieuwland (talk) 09:33, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Its "own entry" as in its own article? From the information available here and over at nl-wiki, the 1839 station seems to only have been in use for three years as a temporary terminus. I do not think a separate article will grow beyond a WP:PERMASTUB. It is probably better off here or in a translation of :nl:Hoofdwerkplaats Haarlem, the 1839 staton's geographic successor. --HyperGaruda (talk) 18:30, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original Haarlem Railway Station (1839)
Talk:Radu Irimescu

message: Why does this article even mention, let alone conclude with, him buying a speedboat in 1955? - Jmabel | Talk 04:33, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Because it calls up a sort of quaint image of him boating off the southern California coast (where I think he moved) with his family in his declining years. Seriously, though: I threw in everything I could find on him, with little regard to how encyclopedic it was. As I noted on the new articles page, of all the details in there, this one can safely be excised, especially as we link to the Time article whence it came. Biruitorul 06:07, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speedboat
Talk:William Benedict Friend

message: Is there such a thing as a "Priest Priest" or is that a typo? Schmiteye 16:49, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Contrabass sarrusophone

message: I found a citation for the claim that Sidney Bechet played contrabass sarrusophone in "Mandy, Make Up Your Mind."  However, I do not really know how to properly add citations, so maybe someone who is better at this can stick this in there:  http://www.contrabass.com/pages/sarrus.html
The recording is available on iTunes as well, in an album titled "Ken Burns Jazz:  Sidney Bechet."  It's a pretty cool sound.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by The paccagnellan (talk • contribs) 06:47, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sidney Bechet
Talk:Universal History (Sale et al)

message: At the moment, the link to George Shelvocke refers to Shelvocke sr. (d. 1742), whereas it was, in fact, his son (also named George Shelvocke) who contributed to the Universal History. According to his tombstone, Shelvocke jr. was the Secretary of the General Post Office and a Fellow of the Royal Society, and died in 1760. He does not have a separate wiki page, on account of there being little other information about him; but perhaps Shelvocke's page should reflect this, or a note should be added here? 71.220.15.26 (talk) 06:45, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: George Shelvocke reference should be to Shelvocke Jr.
Talk:Walther P5

message: Any source of that?--ZH Evers 14:18, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Used by Taiwan Police

message: Is Taxi Driver worth mentioning in the article? Or is it too trivial? --RyanTee82 (talk) 08:50, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: ''Taxi Driver''?
Talk:Piccolo heckelphone

message: From heckle.de
Our music instruments are manufactured, nowadays as in former times, in single piece production, according to the customer's individual desires. We observe the highest standards concerning the balance of intonation and the tone quality. Our service is characterised by our personal advice and support of the musician during his entire career. beny (talk) 20:33, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Piccolo Hecklephone is a special order.
Talk:Octavin

message: https://www.sonic.de/index.php?eID=dumpFile&t=f&f=5703&token=8fcf5d5d7572fcda32beaa935558a7463afc8f76 This may be useful. If anyone knows where this is from I would be thankful.  Schminnte (talk • contribs)  22:41, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference
Talk:Neal's Yard Dairy

message: I have two photos: here's the other one: 
Swap the one on the article for this one if you think it's better, or maybe someone can snap a better one when they get the chance. --Calton | Talk 16:55, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Can someone doublecheck the Python story? The Cheese Shop sketch first aired in 1972 and the shop was founded in 1979. The story told here is quite different: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cheese_Shop_sketch Naniwako (talk) 18:05, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the Borough Market Cookbook the story is an anecdote told by Randolph Hodgson, so presumably having no cheese to sell to Cleese in 1979 reminded him of the 1972 Python Cheese Shop sketch. TSventon (talk) 21:16, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Timing discrepancy

message: I have updated the article and added eight more references using cite templates. Would anyone object if I changed the original two references to cite news templates? Pinging Calton, who started the article. TSventon (talk) 14:49, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference style
Talk:Charlie Strong

message: Charlie Strong hasn't accepted the position at Texas as of 1640hrs (UTC-6), until an official statement has been made by him (or a verifiable source) please don't change his current team. --Txtrooper (talk) 22:42, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hiring by UT- Austin.  

message: The redirect Coach Strong has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Hey man im josh (talk) 14:10, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Coach Strong]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Law Enforcement/Requested articles

message: Hey guys
I was looking at that list of all the current article requests and as they was all foreign i didnt know much about them so i made an article on Police Whistle.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Police,Mad,Jack (talk • contribs) 12:20, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's cool. I'll go take a look. SGGH speak! 10:33, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

text: I don't even think uniform fetishes is a part of this topic, people sometimes add the strangest things! --SGGH speak! 20:18, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've deleted the request, I feel that depending on the context of the meaning, Walter Mitty or Garment fetishism covers the users request.  This is not a law enforcement topic. --Factorylad (talk) 14:54, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes

message: The request for "Uniform Fetishists", would an entry focusing on police uniform be more suitable under the Walter Mitty entry? --Factorylad (talk) 17:30, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't even think uniform fetishes is a part of this topic, people sometimes add the strangest things! --SGGH speak! 20:18, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've deleted the request, I feel that depending on the context of the meaning, Walter Mitty or Garment fetishism covers the users request.  This is not a law enforcement topic. --Factorylad (talk) 14:54, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Uniform Fetishists

message: I wonder if anyone else would be interested in creating an article regarding the topic of police militarization. riffic (talk) 03:57, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  article request 

message: The wikipedia info on UK special constables is very inaccurate and misleading. I have published extensively on this area. How can I edit the page? Violet Julius (talk) 23:32, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  special constables
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Law Enforcement/Peer review

message: Under the Section 'Instruction' on article 
Should it really say: 
I thought this was a law enforcement project not a military history one?
Dep. Garcia (Talk to Me) 19:37, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes

message: Should we use the template below on articles requested to be peer reviewed?
	A request has been made for this article to be peer reviewed to receive a broader perspective on how it may be improved. Please make any edits you see fit to improve the quality of this article.
Dep. Garcia (Talk to Me) 20:17, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Template

message: I tried unsuccessfully to submit a peer review request for the article I created on Joplin Police Department on July 29, 2011, but for some reason could not get it listed correctly on this project page. Any assistance from my fellow Wikipedians in resolving this issue would be most appreciated. --TommyBoy (talk) 06:45, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem Submitting Peer Review Request 

message: The application of the physical sciences to the detection and the investigation and solution of crime!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.76.106.6 (talk) 22:37, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criminalistricks
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Law Enforcement/Templates and awards

message: Unofficial use of the FBI insignia or badge is prohibited by law under USC Title 18. Unless you can show that you have written permission from the Director of the FBI to use the logo, I suggest it be removed from all project logos to eliminate the possibility of criminal complaint and prosecution by the US Justice Department.Patchbook 00:36, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes

message: It has been asserted that the use of this image is a violation of U.S. federal law. This is an extremely serious matter as it exposes the Wikimedia Foundation to possible legal action; therefore, I have removed the image while the issue is researched. Please do not revert until the issue is resolved. If it is determined that the use of the image does not violate any laws, it can be restored immediately. Thanks for cooperation in protecting the Wikimedia Foundation. --Ginkgo100 talk 21:28, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: On further thought, as this image is widely used, I have speedy deleted it at least temporarily, on the principle of WP:IAR. Please do not upload it again for the time being. I will happily undelete when and if appropriate. --Ginkgo100 talk 21:34, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: We have analyzed the law to the best of our ability on the main project talk page. If this law breaking is true, then how does the image on the FBI article survive? Rather confused SGGH 22:12, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Image has been okay'd hereSGGH 01:20, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  FBI insignia image controversy 

message: :Remember, the project aims for no vandalism and no conflict, if an article needs attention regarding vandalism or breaches of wikiquette, please add it to the article watch list.
The comma after the word 'conflict' should be a period and the following 'if' capitalised or something else should be done to prevent this being a run-on sentence. Derekbd (talk) 18:31, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  correction in template
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Law Enforcement/No vandalism, no conflict

message: What does this page have to do with this WikiProject. I noticed it as prominently featured on the project's article banner and wondered whether someone was confused about the purposes of a WikiProject such as the current one, being of course to serve the articles within the scope of the title subject. I can see two avenues for how this situation could arise, the first being that "because we (or some of us) have a keen interest in law and order, we wish to use every conceivable project platform to express this passion – no matter how apropos", and the second being that this project, because it deals with law enforcement, which deals with enforcement of acceptable conduct, and because the project is within Wikipedia, then it should concern itself with promoting and raising awareness about acceptable conduct and counteracting bad behavior on Wikipedia. Both hardly constituting any reasonable rationale for the existence of this page, merely attesting to tangential relationships. Now, I don't see it doing any harm, so it's not like I would press for its removal, however, were there a cogent idea behind its inception I'd be interested in apprehending it.  __meco (talk) 14:58, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just curious...
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Law Enforcement/Participants

message: *Could someone review this edit: →James Kidd (contr/talk/email) 01:02, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I reverted the removal of that image from various pages and left a message at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Law Enforcement with a link toWP:IFD. I don't think that law applies, and if it does, then the image can only be removed from Wikpedia by an administrator anyway. Bobanny 12:20, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Badge Picture

message: I  asked in FBI project page to be reassessed, but it looks inactive if anyone could review and possibly reassess the Hostage Rescue Team (FBI)  article Aaron mcd (talk) 00:24, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: FBI HRT

message: Is that safe secure link at the bottom of the page for any particular reason or can it be removed? --Cameron11598 (Talk) 01:32, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Safe Secure Link? 

message: These topics are very similar and should probably be merged. I'm not sure how to correctly do so though, especially with it being in Dark figure of crime being part of this project. From my judgement the first should be merged into the second since there is already a sub-point 'Crime'. Maybe someone can assist or point to information?
Kulukimaki (talk) 23:36, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging [[Dark figure of crime]] and [[Under-reporting]] 

message: Crime ALERT 🎤 microphone being used with a traveling agenda stalking Maybe GPS an or Cellular Phone Please Report as Crime 70.60.56.30 (talk) 12:20, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should Be Placed as a Criminal intent
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Geoff Mendicino

message: Geoff Mendicino is not the original author of the article. Even though it shares the same name, it's not him.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.223.221.145 (talk • contribs) 
:That doesn't change the fact that the article has no independent proof of notability. And that doesn't just mean saying he's been on some shows.--Drat (Talk) 17:05, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Washington Monument State Park

message: Please note that the coordinates in this article need fixing as:
*
-77.62323 Long.
39.500446 Lat.
Washington County GIS Office, Hagerstown, MD 21740
Done. BrainMarble (talk) 01:55, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Coordinates

message: Could someone describe the interior? Is it just a spiral staircase inside or are there rooms? Thanks --Jolomo (talk) 19:53, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It's just a spiral staircase. -- Pemilligan (talk) 18:50, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Interior

message: Since this article is Washington Monument State Park and not Washington Monument should the lead section be rewritten to focus on the park? -- Pemilligan (talk) 20:27, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead section
Talk:Battle of Ane

message: I've found a 19th-century schoolbook that dates the battle to 1 August 1227 instead of 28 July (p. 41–42). So the question arises whether the monument is wrong, or the book. Even if one converts between Julian calendar and Gregorian calendar, the two dates won't match. De728631 (talk) 15:04, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: 19th century schoolbooks aren't exactly renowned for their reliability and accuracy. The date mentioned is the one multiple sources provide. Kleuske (talk) 12:35, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date
Talk:USS Badger (FF-1071)

message: I've added an 'excessive amount of intricate detail' note to the article. What I mean is things like
Later that day, the ship headed back to Danang to have her five-inch (127 mm) gun barrel replaced by the repair ship USS Hector (AR-7).
Normal west coast operations out of Long Beach occupied her time until 9 July, the day she got underway for her new home port, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. The warship made the voyage in six days, entering Pearl on 14 July.
The whole article is down to this level of detail. Anybody interested in that much detail should go read the source. I think the Wikipedia article should be much more concise.--ospalh (talk) 07:36, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too much detail
Talk:Westminster Hall and Burying Ground

message: The article says, "The graveyard had been known as the old Western Burying Grounds."
Is that correct?  My understanding is the the Western Burying Ground was the Methodist cemetery now known as Western Cemetery. -- Tms 14:10, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Western Burying Ground
Talk:USS Donald B. Beary

message: There is no DANFS listing for this ship since likely its career began after the most recent publication. Therefore, outside of the trivial information found at the NVR listing, the majority of this article is unsourced. --Brad (talk) 17:33, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've excised the bulk of the text, as it appears to be a copyvio of , which is dated to 2001 so it's unlikely to have been copied from us. Maralia (talk) 15:04, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:USS Harold E. Holt

message: That Harold Holt disappeared while swimming? Is this perhaps why a US navy vessel was named after him?--Senor Freebie (talk) 14:38, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's probably irrelevant - the ship was laid down about 5 months after Holt died, and it was probably just a mark of respect at the passing of an allied leader during wartime. It may have had something to do with him being lost at sea, however, so if you can find a decent source, make the edit. Dallas (talk) 09:26, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

text: He was a friend and ally of LBJ not Nixon. Also as an aside Holt himself wouldn't have referred to himself as Harold E Holt. Very few Australians use their middle initial like that. Tigerman2005 (talk) 23:51, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Worth mentioning
Talk:USS Joseph Hewes (FF-1078)

message: ROCN Lan Yang seems to make an appearance in Siren (TV series), S01E07 at about 37 minutes - interestingly as a US Navy ship. She is only briefly in shot and not fully, but what I can see matches :File:ROCN Lan Yang (FFG-935) Leaving Keelung Harbour 20150316a.jpg --2003:C4:DF04:B226:BCFD:5100:EFB6:CBFB (talk) 19:21, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  TV appearance