lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Taruca

message: http://www.cricyt.edu.ar/INSTITUTOS/iadiza/ojeda/TARUCA.htm
http://md1.csa.com/partners/viewrecord.php?requester=gs&collection=ENV&recid=1688008
http://www.worlddeer.org/northandeandeer.html
Folks, my photograph, which you've used for this article, was taken near Putre in Chile.  It is almost certainly Hippocamelus bisulcus, and not H. antisensis.  It'd be great if there were a rights-free photo of antisensis available to use instead.  Sadly I don't have one.  158.143.201.102 14:10, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, we better delete it then. Thanks for spotting the error! Funny that nobody has done it in more than two years. (Of course, you could have just deleted the image yourself.) --Jmk (talk) 09:14, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Actually, checking from the article's history, somebody did delete the image just 5 days after the notice. But two years later somebody else added it back. --Jmk (talk) 09:31, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

message: There has been confusion about whether the photo :File:Huemul.jpg is H. antisensis (= what this article is about) or H. bisulcus. It's no good to just keep adding and deleting it, so we better get some evidence this way or other. So far, we have the claim above by 158.143.201.102 who says they actually took the photo, and that it is "almost certainly" bisulcus. To oppose that, on  User:CHUCA shouts "It is Hippocamelus antisensis; NO is a Hippocamelus bisulcus!!!!!". The latter statement contains five exlamation marks (while the former contains none), so should we hold it more credible? Or does someone have better external information? (Note that copying claims and labels back and forth between en-wiki, Commons and other wikis is not external information.) --Jmk (talk) 09:15, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I understand that the place where the photograph was taken is in Putre in northern Chile, near the border with Peru, in full Hippocamelus antisensis distribution, and thousands of miles north of the closest Hippocamelus bisulcus. The arid habitats can be observed, the grayish color of the coat, the slimmer shape of your body, the antlers split from the crown, etc, etc. Hug. CHUCAO (talk) 02:32, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo, which species?
Talk:Thomas Anstey Guthrie

message: The name 'F. Anstey' must be much better known than Thomas Anstey Guthrie. Valetude (talk) 16:37, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-name page? 

message: Summed-up in two words ‘Guthrie married’ and in the info box ‘Children: Agnes Anstey (?Holborough)’.
I’ve been speed-reading his memoirs, which appear to make no reference to a family. Anything known about names, dates or circumstances? Valetude (talk) 20:10, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Family?
Talk:Coz I Luv You

message: I see this article's titled with a leading apostrophe ('Coz) and there's a redirect here from Coz I Luv You. This is backwards, surely? PL290 (talk) 17:33, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Inverted redirect
Talk:Cult of Personality (song)

message: I noticed someone wrote "It is considered one of the hardest songs on the game, mainly due to its difficult, complex, ever-lasting solos". It's doesn't have ever lasting solos, or complex ones. I have taken this out as it's speculation.
:It's one's own opinion on how difficult the song is. Ihsbislns (talk) 13:48, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: "admittedly being fans of the game, they requested the song being one of the hardest in the soundtrack, and made so by adding a new guitar solo" Ihsbislns (talk) 14:36, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hardest song 

message: Yeah, I added a link to the re-recorded version from Guitar Hero III: Legends of Rock, just for people who are interested to listen to this new version. Pretty much it.
: In the lead it says "In 2007, the song was re-recorded and released for the video game Guitar Hero III: Legends of Rock because the band no longer owns the rights to the original" then in the Other Media section it says "In 2007, Living Colour re-recorded the song for the video game Guitar Hero III: Legends of Rock because the original master recordings could not be located".  Losing the rights to a song and losing the master tapes would be two different things so which is correct?  I would lean towards the original master tapes being lost since the videogame producer would have to secure rights from the copyright holder regardless of what version was used.  Wolfhound668 (talk) 18:46, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Added link to the re-recording

message: In both Hard Rock Guitar Songs for Dummies and Guitar Tab White Pages the intro riff is wrong. Any ideas why?--Peace out (talk) 17:33, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Why do music books get it wrong?

message: CM Punk's Version has the intro riff cut off and it starts like radio static. The solo is also different from the normal version or the Guitar Hero 3 version.
          --Jacob Koopa  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jacob Koopa (talk • contribs) 07:54, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  CM Punk Version
File talk:Symmes logo.jpg

message: Since this is a logo, I'm pretty sure it's copyrighted even if you created this particular image yourself. – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 09:53, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: On second thought, it's ineligible for copyright protection because it just combines multiple elements that aren't copyrightable, such as the shape of the State of Ohio. – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 07:35, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
Talk:Da Doo Ron Ron

message: An infobox was requested for the 1977 Shaun Cassidy version of "Da Doo Ron Ron" at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Missing_encyclopedic_articles/List_of_notable_songs/4. —Preceding unsigned comment added by  InnocuousPseudonym (talk • contribs) 19:49, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I am inclined to drop both "R&B and doo-wop" and add Rock & Roll, but would rather talk than fight about it.  Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 15:25, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Not doo-wop in my view, but R&B is OK (it was a #5 R&B chart hit, and Allmusic regard the Crystals as R&B) - it's certainly pop.  Ghmyrtle (talk) 15:57, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I just removed doo-wop again. Anyone putting it back needs a good source. Carptrash (talk) 01:22, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Looking at the "Genre" field 

message: The video described here sounds like the 1984 Karen Kamon version. Was there actually a similar video using the Crystals' recording? Sbh (talk) 07:01, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Video 
Talk:Dance Hall Days

message: Was this the first or second single released from the album, Points on the Curve?  According to Billboard, "Don't Let Go" debuted first in February 1984 and "Dance Hall Days" debuted in April 1984.  Was it just in the US only that it was the second single, or was it one of those cases where the initial release bombed and was re-released after "Don't Let Go" made the charts? --Wolfer68 (talk) 05:56, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes 2603:8000:D00:3:B925:9243:99C3:1434 (talk) 02:34, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  First single or second single?
Wikipedia talk:WikiOgre

message: I think a category for listing WikiOgres/Ogresses would go nicely with the template. I can't find such a listing, is there one? - HackerOfMinds (talk) 00:37, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is there a listing of WikiOgres? 

message: No Shrek references? 2603:9001:21F0:8430:64C:1D1C:7305:5C58 (talk) 18:03, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shrek
Talk:Ed Gein: The Butcher of Plainfield

message: This is not "The true story...." This movie Gein is a large, always angry, brooding man. Ed Gein was a small, harmless looking man quick with bizarre jokes, who got away with ten or twelve grave robberies and one murder because he was mild mannered. This reel Gein takes living victims to his farm to torture; the real Gein killed two victims quickly and took their bodies to the farm to dismember. The movie has a frenzied manhunt for Gein with a kidnapped girl. Gein was caught for murdering Bernice Worden, his second murder victim, when police found a receipt to Gein for antifreeze from the last sale at Worden's store. The end of the movie claims Ed Gein murdered ten victims but was tried for only two. The real Gein murdered two victims, but was only tried for the last murder with best evidence. The previous murder was a cold case; this movie has them both in a 24 hr period with a grave robbery and murder of a cemetary security guard (?) thrown in, throwing the county into panic. In the real Gein case, the crimes were spread out over a long period of time publicly unsuspected, and there was widespread shock only after Gein was arrested and his crimes were discovered. This movie is very loosely based on the true story. Naaman Brown (talk) 13:56, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not "The true story of..." but very loosely "based on..."  

message: This article is way too short and it poorly written and in need of a rewrite. The plot section should be expanded in more detail than what it currently has. The article is also missing important information on the film's reception which needs to be added to the article. All of these changes and additions need to occur in order for this article to meet Wikipiedia's standards of a well written and developed article.--Paleface Jack (talk) 01:09, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Information and Expansion
Talk:Chicken (gay slang)

message: I've added several search links in the deletion discussion and suggest mining the book search as most constructive for short-term purposes. Benjiboi 02:43, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible references 
Talk:Thomas George Bonney

message: According to List of Carthusians (1800-1879), p.26 Thomas George Bonney was educated there (too?). -- billinghurst (talk) 06:46, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Educated at Charterhouse 
Talk:Thomas Griffiths Wainewright

message: Oscar Wilde wrote a brief memoir on this guy. Called 'Pen, Pencil and Poison: A study in green' it gives some brilliant examples of his art criticism.
tonyk  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.41.79.35 (talk) 18:03, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pen, Pencil and Poison: A study in green
Talk:Georgian Labour Party

message: why was the whole history of the party removed? admittedly it was messy and partisan but most of it was true and verifiable. i am researching georgian political parties myself(though i don't want to break the no original research rule so i'm not going to write the page). i find it strange that that a whole page should be obliterated when it could have just been cleaned. we need more not less on georgian politicsWillyD 11:14, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The article needs some serious revision. It reads very much like party prop. --Kober 10:19, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article reads like a piece of propaganda. Whole sections of the article are unsourced and read like praise pieces for the party. This article needs serious work.Jogarz1921 (talk) 02:41, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is ridiculously bad on POV
Talk:Diggin' on You

message: Do not have definite information I would like on this song, but Babyface had indeed left Atlanta in 1993 and stepped down from LA Face. From that point on, his sessions with TLC were much more limited and were based out of Los Angeles. I am convinced this song was recorded in 1993, solely off of the VH1 documentary, in which its sessions precede Creep (Dec. '93). The nature of movie, still doesn't make it accurate.
On the otherhand, considering that another Babyface production, Red Light Special, was recorded in early 1994, possibly Diggin' on You sessions took place at the same time and possibly not 1993? It is not guranteed either, as TLC easily could've been jetting back and forth between LA and Atlanta during 1993 and 1994, for two different songs. If anyone can confirm any of this, that would be ideal. Thanks.--Carmaker1 (talk) 00:30, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recording Date
Category talk:Alumni of New Hall, Cambridge

message: As New Hall is a women-only college, shouldn't the heading be "Alumnae"? I'd change it if I knew how ...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.47.242.160 (talk) 08:22, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misleading heading 

message: It should be Alumnae. They are all female. 
It should redirect to/from Murray Edwards College Alumni (sic)
It should include Celia Barlow. Reference: Dod's Parliamentary Companion: Guide to the General Election, 2005
81.178.229.118 (talk) 11:17, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Various
Talk:Do That to Me One More Time

message: Now, I notice the article says it is released in 1979. Got that. I also notice that the article cites that it topped the charts in 1980, which is obvious bollocks since it appears on a compilation album by Sony BMG called "70's Dinner Party". I assume you know what you're doing enough to know whose side of the court the blame lies on?--85.210.29.208 (talk) 23:07, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disputed decade 
Talk:Doctor, My Eyes

message: Have the CD right here with me and there is no comma in the song title, either on the back cover or on the CD itself, so I have removed commas from the entry.  I confirmed that there is no comma on the Jackson Browne website.  Understandable mistake, as there is a comma in the opening line. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.88.110.241 (talk) 00:32, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for fixing it! --Falcorian (talk) 11:26, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: User:Kintetsubuffalo reverted it... I'd argue that  single is a similar misspelling as Paint It, Black Jules TH 16 (talk) 14:14, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comma in Title... 
Talk:Rush Rehm

message: I speedied this article because there is no assertion of notability. As a professor, being published establishes absolutely no such notability, and is no such assertion. I have published works and a job at a university, as do hundreds (nay, thousands) of non-notable people. I would ask the admin in question to re-evaluate this decision. --Cheeser1 10:54, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: having published a book is an assertion of notability. i didnt say it was proof of notability. Read WP:CSD and the discussions on its talk page. Saying anything anyone could in good faith take as possible notability is an assertion of notability. Saying one is a professor--even assistant or associate-- is such an assertion, though most assistant and associate professors arent. But I'm going more by the books here. Saying one has published 5 books , 2 by a major university Press, is an unmistakable assertion. i dont regard this as even borderline in passing speedy. 
I do use this with some degree of common sense: saying one has published a single clearly self-published book i do not treat as a credible assertion. Saying one is an instructor at a junior college ditto. Some of the people on the talk page interpret this even more flexibly & would consider those cases assertions.  There is a difference between passing speedy, and passing AfD.  I have no idea whether this would pass AfD. It would depend on the notability of the published works, Given that there a five books, two of them published apparently by Princeton University Press, i would say its a pretty good chance. It would depend for one thing on whom the other publishers are. Some reviews are needed to show it. The author deserves a chance to work on it, and this note will serve to explain what is needed. Reviews in RSs prove notability for authors. DGG (talk) 11:14, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

text: I thank you for the explanation. While this does not appear to be an assertion of notability as I see it, I will defer to your judgment since it errs on the side of caution. However, I intend to AfD the article if notability is not established in a far more substantial way, because even if we decide to accept such as an assertion of notability, it doesn't seem very substantive to me. --Cheeser1 11:23, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speedy declined??
Talk:Thorianite

message: This mineral is also found in Brazilian state of Amapá.Agre22 (talk) 01:49, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Occurrence in Brazil

message: On the Picture is a dark brown Mineral visible. Its not Thorianite, because Thorianite is absolutely black. I think its Thorite. Some people may think some letters more or less in a name are not the big diffrence. Otherwise its not explanable why people cant distinguish between Thorianite and Thorite.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.224.159.211 (talk) 23:52, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture
Talk:Hitohira

message: I think List of Hitohira episodes should be merged into this article.  The whole series had just one season of twelve episodes so there's no real justification for a spin off article.  The Rambling Man (talk) 19:25, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of episodes merged here 
Talk:Holden Commodore (VS)

message: There is a common error on the web, which is repeated here, that the Toyota Lexcen corresponding to the Holden Commodore VS Series II, has a model designation of T5. This is complete fantasy. All Toyota Lexcen models corresponding to the VS, be they Series I or Series II, have a model designation of T4. As with the preceding T1 (VN), T2 (VP) and T3 (VR) models, Toyota never changed the model designation when they updated from Series I to Series II.
I had a 1997 Toyota Lexcen (therefore corresponding to VS Series II, one of the last ever built under the Holden-Toyota agreement) and it was designated as T4 in the Owner's manual and likewise had T4 as the model code within its VIN. Similarly, if one looks on the web for other of these late Lexcen vehicles, where the VIN is given, this shows T4 as the model code, for example : https://www.swuc.com.au/stock/1997-toyota-lexcen-sedan-csi-t5-150804
If you care for the accuracy of the information here, please fix this. I've fixed it in the past and someone reverts it, so I'm not going to waste any more of my time on it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.70.43.107 (talk) 11:46, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  The mythical Toyota Lexcen T5
Talk:Help! I'm a Teenage Outlaw

message: i have done all i can do on this page can someone please get some episodes put on the article i will put all the other details =)Disneyrocks13 10:58, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Done

message: An article Deedee was created about one of the characters in this programme, some content is the same as in this article; I think it should be merged back in as it does not assert notability separate from the programme. —Snigbrook 01:34, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It was never split out in the first place - it was just copied straight. Deleted per WP:A7. TalkIslander 01:50, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Deedee]]
Talk:Wooton Bassett

message: Obviously, God is everywhere and for all time but it would help some of us dwellers in the Vale of Tears to clearly state where these blessed programs are broadcast. I linked to the main article but that is just as vague. It is likely to be a US broadcaster (since they also suffer the same delusion that the entire world is familiar with the location of their particular Nowhereville, just south of That Place) but I cannot a) be certain, and b) be bothered. Note to Deitists; when spreading The Word, include Place! God may be Unknowable, but that is no use in an encyclopedia. LessHeard vanU 10:58, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting, could you go on? 64.107.9.230 (talk) 19:31, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where?
Talk:Timocreon

message: Since there is so little either about Timocreon or by him, this article offers a chance to do something different e.g.  record all his extant verses, plus translations and commentaries. He was a colourful character and well deserves a bit of space. Anyway, I'll fiddle with it now and then. Eyeless in Gaza (talk) 04:20, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Something different
Talk:Timothy Cole

message: According to Arabic wiki, it claims in the infobox that Timothy Cole was born on April 16, 1852 with 7-8 references validating his birth date. Is his sourced birth date legitimate?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Reddish-Panda (talk • contribs) 23:15, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth date
Talk:Mottville, New York

message: Quote "...He finally succumbed to drink and died in Toledo, O., October 30, 1869, aged seventy-one." What was the life expectancy of an US male in the Nineteenth Century? :~D LessHeard vanU 11:05, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wow, there's an argument for teetolism!
Talk:List of Middlesbrough F.C. players

message: I intend to include notable players on the article as well as just appearance/goals data for the current squad once I finish compiling it. The problem is my source doens't list all appearances compared to the records page currently a WIP, and it only goes to 1989. So it needs some work. Here's what I've got so far. --Simmo676 11:11, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable players
Talk:Torridon Group

message: This article is heavily impacted by the work of Krabbendam and co-workers in 2022. Taking this into account will require a major rewrite, which I may get around to at some point. 20:32, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The scope of this article will change as the Stoer Group is removed to its own page - despite the lithological similarities between the Stoer and Torridon Groups they are almost certainly unrelated sequences separated by an unconformity that represents a substantial time gap ~150 million years caused by major tectonic event (the Grenville Orogeny). Mikenorton (talk) 20:18, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

text: The Sleat Group will also need its own page, with that being summarised on the Wester Ross Supergroup page. Mikenorton (talk) 17:08, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

text: My plan is to leave this article unchanged for now, waiting until all the new articles are more or less complete. This will inevitably lead to some duplication and inconsistency but I think that this approach is preferable to trying to change them all at once, which might lead to even more confusion (for me if nobody else). Mikenorton (talk) 17:08, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  New stratigraphy
Talk:Forestville, New South Wales

message: This article lacks references for a number of sections. I've added citation needed tags to the relevant sections.
Carmazina (talk) 08:00, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: This has been done (by other editors). peterl (talk) 21:26, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: citation needed tags
Talk:Tshi

message: There is no group that is called Tshi in Ghana. The only source is back to 1911, over 100 years ago.
My guess is that Tshi was confused with the language Twi (the most common spoken language in Ghana).
The ethnic group that speak Twi are the Akan people and not a group called "Tshi".
Therefore the article should be deleted.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.246.2.11 (talk) 21:34, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Autorité de la concurrence

message: Please expand this page, especially if you are French, and know something! Wikidea 11:26, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

message: The referencing in this article was badly mangled, in this edit of 17:42, 12 December 2016 by  which added 45kb of text, porting over strings like:
* 43
which make no sense and are not interpreted as footnotes by the Wikimedia software.  All such strings need to be removed, and the article properly referenced. Mathglot (talk) 00:22, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Referencing badly mangled in large 2016 expansion