lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Kaithapram Damodaran Namboothiri

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
:* Support the proposal. Salih (talk) 15:45, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Adare Manor Hotel

message: Since all information here is repeated from Adare Manor, for the convenience of the Wikipedia reader, this little advertisement for Adare Manor Hotel should be a redirect. Any problems, like spoiling a collector's set of All the Hotels of Ireland or some such category? --Wetman (talk) 18:08, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have just merged this to Adare Manor. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 10:46, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Shiva Keshavan

message: India was represented at Innsbruck Winter Olympics in 1964. Subsequetly in 1988, 1992, 1998, 2002 and 2006. So says infobox of wikipage on India at the 2010 Winter Olympics. Also see List of participating nations at the Winter Olympic Games. The assertion about the first Indian at Winter Olympics  here needs to clarified. --13:27, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  First Indian at Winter Olympics? 

message: Apparently at Luge Camp, they showed the movie, and it really inspired him? (according to recent interviews) -- 70.50.148.122 (talk) 12:50, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Cool Runnings]]
Talk:Clayton Alderfer

message: This article reports of a recent death but I fail to find any source of Alderfer's death. Avellano (talk) 08:09, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: untitle

message: In the article the phrase 'in the hopes of achieving the higher need.' is used.  
It is my understanding that Alderfer did not see the needs as a rigid hierarchy as per Maslow, but rather saw any order as pertaining to a particular individual, allowing for people who put fame and fortune above personal relationships. 
I do not feel that this is made clear.
--86.29.141.188 00:11, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: untitle

message: The link on bottom is broken  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.160.88.198 (talk) 20:36, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link is broken
Talk:Breath (novel)

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Breath (novel). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080918073340/http://www.jd-associates.com.au:80/authors/book/breath to http://www.jd-associates.com.au/authors/book/breath
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121105004807/http://www.canada.com/montrealgazette/news/books/story.html?id=78aa6363-5c2c-4bc8-b51b-a7fa8836a460&p=2 to http://www.canada.com/montrealgazette/news/books/story.html?id=78aa6363-5c2c-4bc8-b51b-a7fa8836a460&p=2
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
 Perry Middlemiss (talk) 08:40, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Corrected the female sex offender denial/apologetics (see https://www.amazon.com/Perspectives-Female-Sex-Offending-Culture/dp/1138250007) by correctly characterizing Eva's statory rapes of Pikelet and by removing the ridiculous notion that her rape of Pikelet was part of an affair.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.235.9.45 (talk) 00:47, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: At least in the film, Bruce Pike is a quite willing participant with prior attraction to Eva Sanderson, so I think the phrasing makes it look worse than what is actually described. It's still pretty bad on many levels, though. 惑乱 Wakuran (talk) 11:42, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Woman-boy Statutory Rape
Talk:Austin Freeway

message: Does anyone have access to the official dimensions of the thing.    I'm curious to know if they had to lengthen the wheelbase to accommodate the longer engine, since the original engine bay was presumably designed for the four cylinder 1622cc unit and it would have been uncharacteristically prescient for BMC to have built in enough length in the engine bay for a six cylinder unit mounted lengthways.   But it would be nice (well, nice at least for me) to take these musings beyond mere speculation.   And if you did, thanks for thinking about it.    Regards Charles01 (talk) 16:23, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Wheelbase

message: I lived in New Zealand in this perod and I never saw an A60 based Freeway.
Not with an Austin badge. Not with a Morris Badge. 
Though I did know such things existed in Australia.
My recollection is that the ADO 17 was known as an Austin/Morris 1800 in New Zealand and (although at first I denied it) I do now recall seeing examples with Freeway on the back and there are at least two surviving examples (from 1967 and 1969) still registeresd in New Zealand as BMC Freeways. Perhaps Earlier or later examples were marketed as Moris/Austin 1800s.
The six cylinder 2200cc ADO17 never came to New Zealand. More's the pity.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.246.54.55 (talk) 05:23, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Freeway in New Zealand.
Talk:St Jerome's Laneway Festival

message: Other Cities - added Perth and removed comment about it being rumoured to go to other cities in future (as it goes to all the major city stops that are typical for tours of this size already now) Phenalot (talk) 02:17, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other Cities 

message: I completed a fairly extensive revision today, as an avid copyeditor perceived the page as a promotional tool for both the festival and its organisers. Please desist from this in the future, as I wil continue to monitor it. I will also send a message to the editor. Thanks. Regards,--Soulparadox (talk) 14:48, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Promotional tone
Talk:Deborah Sosimenko

message: Sport: Track & Field
Height: 5' 7"
Weight: 198 pounds
Deborah Sosimenko
Australia
Age: 35
DOB: April 05, 1974
I'm fairly new here and I do not know how I can add this in a form of  TABLE Thanks--Notedgrant (talk) 13:01, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can someone help me in adding this info 
Talk:The Simpsons: Minutes to Meltdown

message: I think this article should be merged with List of The Simpsons video games for the following reasons:
*All the important information fits nicely into the list (I've already added it there),
*It's a mobile game (only 30 minutes long), and therefore hasn't received as much coverage or reviews in reliable sources as the other games. In fact, with the exception of the review below, I've been unable to find any significant coverage at all in reliable sources. Most Google results are press releases,
*The only review from a reliable source is the following one by IGN: . The important content of this review (i.e. not the game-guide information) is already summarized in the Minutes to Meltdown listing in List of The Simpsons video games.
Theleftorium (talk) 13:10, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge discussion
Talk:New York TRACON

message: The word "owns" would be better expressed as "is responsible for" or similar wording.  "Owns" is shorthand usage, which does not properly express the meaning of the sentences in which it is used, many times in this article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.15.57.109 (talk) 19:23, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Choice of words
Talk:Lt. Kernal

message: Someone moved this article from Lt. Kernal to Commodore Lt Kernal on the grounds of consistency.  I moved the article back to the original name because
#The name of the product is the Lt. Kernal, not the Commodore Lt. Kernal; and
#Commodore never manufactured or marketed this product.
That the drive was intended for use with Commodore computers should have no bearing on the title of this article. —Psychonaut 00:35, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I have created the redirect as suggested. -- Mecandes (talk) 14:04, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name

message: Does anyone have a record of the original price of the Lt. Kernal hard drives? It would be nice to include that with this article. (I seem to recall a friend buying a used 20mb version for $1000, but that's just my poor memory giving a vague ballpark idea) -- Mecandes (talk) 13:56, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I purchased a 20 MB Lt. Kernal for my C-128 in mid-1987 and paid 969 USD for it.  In mid-1988, I acquired a 40 MB version for the same price.  The cost decreased several times during the life of the product as the wholesale cost of embedded SCSI drives went down. Bigdumbdinosaur (talk) 20:45, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Price

message: Someone edited this article into an awful mess by copying out-of-context information from Floodgap and other sources.  The description of the Lt. Kernal as posted at Floodgap, is poorly-worded, plus has a number of outright errors that should have been fixed 15 years ago (the Lt. Kernal site at Floodgap stopped being maintained when its author passed away some years ago).
Few individuals during the life of the Lt. Kernal had access to detailed technical information about the system (intentionally so on the part of Fiscal Information), especially at the hardware level.  Unsurprisingly, much of what has been published on-line about the Lt. Kernal is incorrect.
For example, following Xetec’s takeover of production, all 20 MB Lt. Kernal systems were produced with embedded-controller SCSI drives (mostly Miniscribe units).  Some 40 and 80 MB units were built with ST-506 mechanisms and OMTI controllers.  Use of the ST-506/OMTI combination ended in late 1989 as higher-capacity, embedded-controller SCSI drives became readily available.  Yet, whomever butchered up this article apparently didn’t know that.
There are a number of other errors, but I am not going to fix any of them.  This is what I don’t like about Wikipedia—uninformed edits and no way to prevent them, and is why I discontinued being involved.
:Bigdumbdinosaur (talk) 04:45, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Awful mess
Talk:Classical education

message: Sorting out the inbound links to this new disambiguation page proved the need for this page.  For the record, I examined them all, but, unusually (perhaps sometimes overcautiously), I had to leave many links pointing to this page, because it was often so vague what was meant.  Many usages need to be distinguished: the education of a 19th-century British sixth-former vel sim. (as linked in many biographical articles), the education of Christian homeschooled Idaho third-graders who learn no Latin or Greek, the education of a Medieval monk learning from Peter Abelard, the education of Cicero...I hope it does not require argument that each of these may belong in a separate topic.  We may hope that this disambiguation page will clarify the need for better historical treatment of various classical educations.  Wareh 01:24, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Overall, it's an improvement, but I would've thought that at least the link on the Philosophy of Education might be obvious.  But oh well :). -- TimNelson (talk) 01:47, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explanation of this page
Talk:Sai Bhonsale

message: Saibai Bhonsale was the first wife and chief consort of Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj, the founder of the Maratha Empire. She was the mother of her husband's successor Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj. Enigma2212 (talk) 13:55, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Saibai
Talk:Borkum Riff

message: The text was taken directly from the website, thus the obvious "selling" tone. I've removed the most blatant stuff and toned down the rest. There are two different years of introduction given, is it "early 60's" or 1968? Hexmaster 00:48, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Jehangir H. Kothari

message: There is a tombstone in the main city cemetery of Trieste, Italy, that bears the inscription "Sir Jehangir H. Kothari, Kt., O.B.E., K.I.H. Born 16 November 1855, Died 1st November 1934"  I assume that this is the same Seth Jehangir Hormusji Kothari who is the subject of this Wikipedia article. Does anyone know what Sir Jehangir was doing in Trieste in 1934, and what was the cause of his death?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Penruddock (talk • contribs) 20:26, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Sheetal Mallar

message: The spelling in the article and over many sources indicate the name of the model as Sheetal Malhar. Some of the online sources are as follows:
 
http://www.seasonsindia.com/modelwatch/sheetal_sea.htm (Seasons India)
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/calcutta-times/India-still-has-a-fetish-for-the-fair-skin/articleshow/1712003.cms  (Times of India)
in.linkedin.com/pub/sheetal-malhar/33/78b/66b (LinkedIn Page)
http://www.santabanta.com/gallery1.asp?mid1=183034 (Lakme Fashion Week Photo Images Gallery)  Any effort to rename the file is pure vandalism. If still doubt persist, please discuss with me. Hindustanilanguage (talk) 15:08, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Consider the warning you've issued as one to be one for you. The page has a longstanding title and usage (that you changed the usage before you moved doesn't provide any justification). As I mentioned in my earlier revert, a majority of reliable sources, use Mallar as the correct spelling, including the subject herself. ToI: , , Rediff: , Vogue:  and the subject's personal website: . So stop this nonsense about vandalism (read what it means), and if you wish to change this, establish consensus through process listed at WP:RM. —SpacemanSpiff 17:36, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  Long standing titles are no proof of originality just as your username cannot possible be your real name. Do some research and you will yourself conclude that it Malhar. And I take no note of your threatening approach, although I will take any initiative on this issue only after a consensus after some time. Hindustanilanguage (talk) 18:26, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  <big>WARNING</big>
Talk:Facel Vega Facel II

message: Production was discontinued after only 182 units were built with the marque's bankruptcy following the warranty claims of Facel Vega's smaller Facelia in 1964. Today several hundred Facel Vegas are still on the road around the world.
If only 182 were built, how can there be several hundred still on the road? 24.61.56.56 00:51, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: How Many Still On The Road?

message: It should, surely, properly be called the "Facel Vega Facel ll" - how does one alter the heading entry?86.154.133.144 (talk) 19:05, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Proper Name

message: I'm assuming it was the one who was blown up but it could be the current Lord Brabourne, does anyone know for sure?(Morcus (talk) 15:56, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which lord Brabourne? 

message: It says 
"Like its predecessor, the Facel Vega HK500, the Facel II was heavier than its two-seater rivals, weighing 1,880 kilograms (4,140 lb) (37 cwt) 'dry' and almost two tons with four passengers and a full petrol tank"
How does that make sense? Last I'd heard, a standard ton is 2,000lbs, yet this claims that it both weighs more than 4,000lbs "dry", and "nearly 2 tons" with passengers and a full tank. Do I need to explain the contradiction here?.45Colt 06:44, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weight.
Talk:Star Wars: Battlefront

message: Am I the only one who thinks Unseen64 is an extremely unreliable source? I've taken a closer look at that "concept art" wearing the "Star Wars: Battlefront IV watermark" but I have to say, this could be concept art for any other game or movie, or fan made, and even more importantly: the watermark looks extremely fake. Take a look at the "IV" part and you'll notice that anyone who's half decent at any drawing program could have easily put that in. And I haven't even gone on about how illogical it would be for LucasArts to start working on IV if III isn't even HALF done. My question: can't we better delete the Star Wars: Battlefront IV part? It is misleading and merely based on a few strange "concept art" images posted on an unreliable website. --DaniellaGiovanna (talk) 20:35, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have to agree with you, not only is the artwork unreliable. But with 3 being nothing more then a rumor. I do not feel like Lucas Arts would even begin to work on the 4th. --Jesus4u09  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.184.50.239 (talk) 23:09, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Star Wars: Battlefront IV 

message: Under the "Gameplay" heading there is a repetitive, and confusing statement: "...The gameplay is similar to that found in the Battlefield series and related series. Games normally revolve..."
I would edit this myself, but I do not have a sufficient understanding of the mechanics of the Battlefront series to do so. --209.226.111.123 (talk) 02:31, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fixing the "Gameplay" heading 

message: Is there any merit to mentioning the coverage the SWBFIII XBox360 build leak of a couple of days back? I have a few sources here if it is:
http://kotaku.com/star-wars-battlefront-iii-prototype-apparently-leaks-1754127977
http://bgr.com/2016/01/21/star-wars-battlefront-3-prototype-leak/
https://www.vg247.com/2016/01/21/star-wars-battlefront-3-footage-emerges-from-apparent-leak/
I'm not sure if it counts as 'notable' enough, hence why I'm asking here first. Gistech (talk) 10:26, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Star Wars Battlefront III playable build leak worth mentioning?
Talk:Jihad al-Bina

message: "Jihad Al Binna" is erroneous for the Arabic name, namely جهاد البناء. There is absolutely no double "n" as we are quoting. Even the only source quoted for the article http://almashriq.hiof.no/lebanon/300/320/324/324.2/hizballah/jihad-el-binna/index.html says "Jehad Al Binaa" which is a far better transliteration of the Arabic name of the organization. The knowledgeable Washington Institute uses "Jihad al-Bina". Please refer to http://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/view/shutting-hizballahs-construction-jihad. Here's the Berkley Center of Religion with "Jihad al-Bina" See http://berkleycenter.georgetown.edu/resources/organizations/jihad-al-bina?q= The highly reliable Lebanese English language daily newspaper The Daily Star also uses "Jihad al-Bina" See http://www.dailystar.com.lb/Lebanon-Examiner/Oct/16/Hizbullahs-Jihad-al-Bina-has-been-doing-infrastructure-work-for-20-years.ashx#axzz2NxmqDeGK werldwayd (talk) 06:08, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Jihad Al Binna, an erroneous transliteration
Talk:Cardwell Reforms

message: "The starting point was a Royal Commission in 1858, established in the aftermath of the Crimean War .... In addition to the obvious instances of incompetence and maladministration which had been revealed...." -- When? How? And most importantly, what? Could someone please expand on these "obvious" instances of incompetence and maladministration, and how they were revealed? (Or if we have an existing article on this, please link to it.) Thanks. -- 201.37.229.117 (talk) 17:28, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Obvious instances of incompetence and maladministration" 

message: Could someone help me here. What are the rules for editing an article with this special status? I am keen to add in a section on the role of Garnet Wolseley - both as an aide to Cardwell, when assistant adjutant general, and then in his battle to shore up and develop the reforms in a series of more senior posts afterwards. As the article already says, there was a great deal of resistance in the Army - especially to both strands of the policy on reserves (short -regular - service and integrating the militia). Yet this was what made Britain able for the first time to construct a large expeditionary force in the 2nd Boer War - and provided the foundations for Haldane's reforms before the 1st World War.Julian Brazier (talk) 09:34, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for stepping forward. There's no special protection on the article, so provided you have found reliable sources, go ahead. Also consider updating the section in Garnet Wolseley, 1st Viscount Wolseley. --Wire723 (talk) 14:31, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, Wire723, will do. I have in fact made some additions to the article on Garnet WolseleyJulian Brazier (talk) 17:28, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Garnet Wolseley

message: There is a very interesting element of this article that was added in 2007
::They then had the choice between accepting discharge without pension or signing on for a further term, being rewarded with two months furlough, another enlistment bounty and a pension on completion of their term. More than half of all discharged soldiers chose to sign back on immediately, while around one in five who were discharged signed on again within six months. While this produced a long-service army of veterans, it provided no class of men who could be summoned back to the colours in case of emergency.
Here is the link to that version of the article:
The contributor has not been active on Wikipedia since 2015. Does anyone know where this came from? I looked in the books authored by Skelley, Spiers and Raugh, but the above was not sourced from these secondary sources. Keith H99 (talk) 13:39, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Soldiers discharged prior to 1870 - interesting, but not sourced properly 

message: This doesn't mention anything about the uniform changes, e.g. the imposition of tartan trews on the Scottish Lowland regiments who hitherto had worn regular army uniforms.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  11:48, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uniforms
Talk:1938 Changsha fire

message: This banner was added to the article:
"This article has been nominated to be checked for its neutrality. Discussion of this nomination can be found on the talk page. (January 2013)"
However, there is no discussion on this Talk page about neutrality. Will the person who posted the banner please elaborate on what portions s/he considers to be a non-neutral point of view? Few WP editors are mind-readers B^) . Thank you, Wordreader (talk) 22:05, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: npov tag removed --Tomchen1989 (talk) 15:55, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality questioned