lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Karatoya River

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20060720060732/http://banglapedia.org/ht/K_0086.HTM https://archive.org/details/dli.bengal.10689.13287/page/n55/mode/2up. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 02:29, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:HMS Warwick (D25)

message: On Wikipedia there are three different dates for her fate and two wreck sites:
* This article – on 20 February 1944, while patrolling off Trevose Head, and under the command of Cdr. Denys Rayner, Warwick was torpedoed by U-413. She sank in minutes, with the loss of over half her crew.
* 21 April 1944, according to German submarine U-413
* 20 June 1944 – HMS Warwick sunk off the Isles of Scilly by U-413 according to Defending Scilly published by English Heritage in 2011. Jowaninpensans (talk) 21:10, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Fate
Talk:Baby Doll (disambiguation)

message: Shouldn't the second word of the title of this article be in lowercase ("Baby doll" instead of "Baby Doll")? B7T 03:25, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

message: This disambiguation page has been cleaned up by Wikiproject Disambiguation. DesertAngel  19:24, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: #REDIRECT [[Baby dolls from Russia  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.217.78.83 (talk) 18:19, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  baby dolls from Russia
Talk:USS Jamestown (PG-55)

message: Here it says :
*".. Savarona in 1928 by Pusey & Jones Corp., Wilmington, Delaware, for Mrs. Thomas S. Cadwallader of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. While Mrs. Cadwallader operated her, Savarona was said to be the largest and most luxurious yacht in the world. " and then it became an USS.
*But Savarona says that the ship was built for Ms Cadwallader ... and then owned by the great Turkish leader!!!
I can't tell and have no information. Please check it can't be the same luxurious ship ??? -- DLL   .. T 13:13, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They are not the same ship—their launch dates are two years apart, they have different builders, and the Jamestown was built in Delaware, while the MV Savarona was built in Germany. Just a case of sharing the same name. Maralia (talk) 14:19, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  please check Savarona
Talk:Shepperton branch line

message: Article says it was intended to go to a terminus on N bank of Thames. Another online article (http://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/1077162) would have the line going to Weybridge and I, a long lifetime user, was always fed that it was planned to get to Chertsey. That it did not connect at Chertsey is lamented by those given to lamentation as a good diversionary route missed.--SilasW (talk) 19:11, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beyond Shepperton 

message: Does anyone know the date it became two tracks? That must have been the point when a more frequent service was possible and so changing the nature of Shepperton as a place to commute from. Szczels (talk) 14:01, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Twin Tracks

message: I would like to do some work over the next few weeks to bring this article up to a decent "C" class standard. Principally, I would like to tighten up the text, add a little more information and improve the referencing. Per WP:CITEVAR, would anyone object if I convert the reference format to use Template:sfn? (Pinging  as an editor responsible for adding a fair chunk of content in the past couple of years, although I don't think they are around any more.)
Thanks and best wishes, Mertbiol (talk) 20:42, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the courtesy of alerting me. But please go ahead and do as you see fit. Afterbrunel (talk) 10:24, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks  I have made these changes. Per WP:SUMMARY, I have moved some material on the racecourse station and services to Kempton Park railway station, where I felt it fitted better. I wondered if you had any photos of the line (especially from the pre-privatisation era) that you might be able to upload to Commons? Thanks and best wishes, Mertbiol (talk) 17:14, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Referencing style
Talk:Estremenho dialect

message: I just started this article. I needs lots and lots of help finishing it! learnportuguese 03:32, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article started 

message: What about Daman and Goa? Portuguese is not spoken there much anymore nowadays, but historically it WAS the Europeans who colonized these ares. I think there should be something in this article about Índia as well. learnportuguese (talk) 18:45, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Portuguese colonies in Índia 

message: I wold suggest to remove "pure and correct" and simply write:
"...and is the basis of Standard Portuguese taught and spoken by dwellers..." (LBA) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.97.244.33 (talk) 18:12, 30 May 2009‎
:, copy edited. - M0rphzone (talk) 05:27, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove pure and correct
Talk:Rick Schwartz

message: Removed 'resume' tag posted by anonymous user who placed in retaliation for edits on another page. User placed same tag on five pages I have contributed to without explanation.Wintertanager (talk) 18:30, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Tag was not retaliatory. Tag is to do with issues on the page. The explanation is contained within the tag: Namely, the article is written like a resumé.  I am less anonymous than you are. 79.97.226.247 (talk) 21:24, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry but I disagree.  Can you cite specific issues with the page?Wintertanager (talk) 21:55, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

message: Does this article read too much like a résumé, and should it be  tagged as such until it is brought up to standard? 79.97.226.247 (talk) 19:26, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: In fairness to  79.97.226.247, this RFC included several pages I had originally contributed to after quite a bit of back and forth; he was justified in adding.  Of the pages he tagged, I think the state of this particular one was the worst at the time of the RFC (it had gone through much editing since I originally created - or contributed to, I can't remember).  Since the RFC there have been quite a few edits that have reduced the issues (I hope), but it was pretty bad. Wintertanager (talk) 02:17, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops, sorry 72, I didn't even look at the date of the RfC and see the previous versions. Since I just got the request and saw no other comments, I spaced out and thought it was new. Really the only issue was all the name dropping with associated people. And of course I'm not a fan of "tenure" for non-professors, unless it's something like president of notable company or organization. Glad you have worked it out - if you need any opinions hit me up. —МандичкаYO 😜 03:05, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Article looks pretty good. It is a little short and could use some more content but I wouldn't say it reads like a resume. Meatsgains (talk) 20:46, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  RFC 

message: I have an issue with listing every company the subject works for as a subheading. Its not necessary to break down the career to this level and it has a promotional ring to it. I'd appreciate other thoughts on this. Flat Out talk to me 00:54, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Career section
Talk:Ounce Labs

message: Even though the article is short, what is there reads like an excerpt from and ad, website, or press-release. It needs to be cleaned up. For guidelines see WP:TONE and WP:NOT. Plus you'll need sources. If you need help, point me at some references and I'll try to assist. Arthurrh 03:51, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ad-like article
Talk:Minkrat

message: I can find no proof that this "minkrat" exists. The article claims the name is Mustela Rattus, but there are zero results for this   nor for alternate spelling of Mustela Ratus  or Mustella rattus/ratus. And the article states this species is either extinct in the wild, or critically endangered, but I find no such species on http://www.iucnredlist.org. Additionally, PolBot populates Wikipedia based on IUCN redlist information, and according to Mustela there is no such subspecies. Therefore, I'd suggest redirecting the article to Mustela. Ariel♥Gold 03:56, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Questionable factual accuracy of article
Talk:List X site

message: I'm looking for references.  has a reference: "N/B – All roles within our client require a level of Security Clearance. The Cabinet Office now mandates that the minimum clearance level required by those applying for employment within the ‘List X’ industry or with a Government Department/Agency is the ‘Baseline Personnel Security (BS) clearance. Our client; a ‘List X’ company, will therefore require from applicants, information and documentation to confirm their identity, employment or educational history, nationality & immigration status and criminal record (unspent convictions only) in order to satisfy the Baseline Standard Security clearance requirement."
Secretlondon 04:10, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

message: I disagree with the proposed deletion of this article by Porcupine so I have removed the template.  The reasons for the deletion were:
* "Totally unsourced; has been for a very long time" - well there is one source on the page  (see section 5 of the linked page) which verifies the content of the first two sentences.
* "A classified subject (I guess) so it would be almost impossible to expand" - I wasn't aware that not being able to expand an article over a certain size was criteria for deletion (please correct me if this is wrong).  Surely if it cannot be expanded any further then it should be merged into another article (the best place would be Classified information in the United Kingdom).
johnSLADE (talk) 23:26, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: What do you mean by section 5 of the linked page? The only proper linked page is "FSC", and that has only four sections.--Porcupine (prickle me! · contribs · status) 07:59, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There was once a section in the deletion policy that listed (non-exhaustively) criteria for deletion, explaining why there were a problem.  IIRC, in amongst the reasons was something along the lines of "no potential for expansion".  This should probably be merged somewhere, but it's difficult to pick out a specific target article to merge it to.  217.36.107.9 (talk) 13:17, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed deletion 

message: The ‘list N’ link at the bottom is no longer valid. 92.40.195.105 (talk) 16:30, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken Link
File talk:Spamily Tree.JPG

message: This image is NOT to be used in any article; it is purely a work of original research to illustrate a point to a fellow editor. Unschool 04:16, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

message: If I have not properly tagged this, will someone let me know?  This is my own work (such as it is) and I couldn't care less who uses it, except that I know that, as OR, it is not suitable for any article. Unschool 22:39, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attribution
Talk:New Caledonia national football team

message: If New Caledonia wins the OFC nations cup 2008,They may qualifiy for the World Cup.--Cokepepsi 04:30, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: England/Scotland/Wales/Northern Ireland leap to mind --Rumping (talk) 20:42, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  The first FIFA member not a country to make it to a world cup 

message: Most of the other French overseas territories and deparments seem to have football teams, but only New Caledonia is in FIFA.  Does anyone know the reason for this?  Is it something to do with New Caledonia's gradual moves towards independence? --Jfruh (talk) 16:37, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is New Caledonia the only French overseas possession in FIFA? 
Talk:Icebox cake

message: The photo is NOT of an ice box cake. The photo is truly of something more along the lines of a trifle or something entirely different. That picture doesn't even have wafers in it! An icebox cake is made by layering chocolate wafers and whipped cream, and left over night so the ingredients sort of form a soaked up cake thing. This photo is of dried grham cracker crumbs layer with pudding, NOT AN ICEBOX CAKE! Truly, I think that could best be described as dirt pudding, add some gummy worms and that's exactly what you've got.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.44.26.241 (talk) 18:24, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

message: I found the following book at a public library: Icebox Cakes: Recipes for the Coolest Cakes in Town by Jean Sagendorph and Jessie Seehan with photographs by Tara Donne, .What other books do you know about?--Apisite (talk) 17:42, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cookbooks
Talk:KPYV

message: Per the WP:Disambig page, "If only a primary topic and one other topic require disambiguation, then disambiguation links are sufficient, and a disambiguation page is unnecessary." Since the current radio station call letters are the primary identification and the former callsign of the other station is a secondary identification, a hat note is sufficient and requires no more steps than would a disambiguation page for people seeking the other radio station.- Dravecky (talk) 09:25, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rationale for deletion of disambiguation page
Talk:Geneseo Historic District

message: I came across NRIS Ref # 08000659 that seems to indicate that the area of the district is now 808 acres (half of the village area). Someone more familiar with the historic district should probably look into this and adjust the article as needed. --Polaron | Talk 22:25, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  boundaries expanded in 2008? 
Template talk:Huntsville AL Radio

message: I like the new navbox but what happened to market-leader WDRM (102.1 FM)?  I'll need to check but I bet WDRM isn't the only station missing from this new navbox.  And how should stations like WEUP be handled?  There are both AM and FM stations with the WEUP calls in the market but only WEUP-FM appears in the "by callsign" list (as "WEUP"!). Shouldn't both stations be represented?  Or should that link point to the disambiguation page?  (I lean strongly to the former.)  Oh, I do appreciate that AM is listed first by frequency. It just seems the right thing to do. - Dravecky 06:05, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: stations which simulcast on multiple stations, especially those with similar callsigns (such as WEUP and WEUP FM) should be merged onto the same page. In the case of similar names broadcasting different programming, the "by callsign" list should include both the WXYZ and WXYZ-FM callsigns since they are different stations.  Just my $.02 --Rtphokie 11:44, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with your logic but am compelled to point out that while WEUP (AM) is simulcast on WHIY and WEUV and WEUP-FM is simulcast on WEUZ-FM, WEUP (AM) and WEUP-FM only share a morning show and are otherwise distinctly programmed stations. - Dravecky 20:45, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Work in progress?
Talk:Gerrit Smith Estate

message: The coordinates need the following fixes:
* Accurate coordinates: 42.967863, -75.686727
--192.91.147.35 (talk) 20:17, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. Deor (talk) 23:31, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error 
File talk:SouthernSquadron13b.jpg

message: In accordance with Wikipedia:WikiProject Comics/copyright refer:
=== Cover scans ===
For general comic book, graphic novel and trade paperback covers, it is generally accepted that, like Compact disc or DVD covers, they can be used under fair use reasoning for the purpose of identification, as long as the image of the comic book cover is clearly captioned, identifies the series and issue number in question, credits the artists, and is used in an article containing commentary or analysis of the issue or series in question.
The information as prescribed above has been provided as the fair use rationale for the use of this image.Dan arndt 05:34, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair Use Rationale
Talk:Richard Field (printer)

message: This article is deeply biased and unprofessional. I will not enter into an edit war with Mr. Barlowe, whose unprofessional tactics are exemplified in many Wikipedia discussions. The purpose of this note is to document the need for major revisions to the article. There is no evidence that the author "William Shakespeare" ever knew Richard Field, and the article's agenda -- which is to create an association out of largely imaginary "evidence" -- needs to be corrected. --98.218.42.191 (talk) 17:30, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Carry on living in your fantasy world. It is biassed towards reality, as we all should be. In fact it says exactly what the professionals in scholarship of the period say. So it would be "unprofessional" to do otherwise. Paul B (talk) 17:34, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias
Talk:List of fiction set in ancient Rome

message: I have changed the page to emphasize that only works set in the city of Rome qualify. (I was looking for a list of this kind and decided to build & update this list to find works easily). Another article with lists of all works has been created (everything transferred) for all works set in the Roman world. 
I hope this is permissible. If not, please let me know, and I will create a new list for only works set in the city of Rome.
wikibiohistory 05:46, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Criterion

message: Authors John Maddox Roberts and Steven Saylor overlap the same time period with two similar characters, both essentially detectives. But they are in different places in the article. It shows that Roberts has a series, but appears that Saylor only has a book. He too has a series "Roma Sub Rosa". Student7 (talk) 12:00, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Categorization

message: Can someone merge the two articles: Fiction set in ancient Rome and Fiction set in the Roman empire? Please? It's such a mess now.
In the Fiction set in the Roman empire article there are books set in the times of the Republic while "Empire" is the post-Republican phase of Rome!
Both articles have duplicate entries. It's nearly impossible to add to Fiction set in ancient Rome only those novels that are set in the city itself.
Either merge the two articles or delete Fiction set in the Roman empire which has less entries than the other one.
Rafal123
: I was about the write the very same! Blanche of King's Lynn (talk) 16:40, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  What content did you merge into this article (as you're saying that "there might be more content"). As far as I can see you didn't merge but simply redirect! Please don't do this. --Fixuture (talk) 15:32, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  Much of it was already duplicative. Any editor is welcome to comb through the page history to improve the list czar 15:34, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  Well I merged them now. --Fixuture (talk) 19:18, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  What a mess!
Talk:2001 Warragamba bushfires

message: This article states that embers from the main front (between Warragamba and Helensburgh) led to the fires around St George's Basin and Jervis Bay.  I don't believe that this was the case, and is even possible, considering these areas are well over 100km away.  Scleaver (talk)  —Preceding undated comment was added at 04:59, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:David Hyerle

message: Hyerle's "Thinking Maps" is used in a large number of school districts, I am hoping others can contribute so there is a non-pr source for who this guy and his program is --Zeke pbuh 05:56, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Henry Larcom Abbot

message: * https://oregonencyclopedia.org/articles/abbot_henry_larcom_1831_1927_/#.WTazFxiZNo4 ---Another Believer (Talk) 13:51, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oregon Encyclopedia 

message: Please would an interested editor review the abandoned draft at User:Timathom/Henry Larcom Abbot, as it may provide useful material for this article, particularly the expanded list of publications with OCLC links. 
After using what's usable from that page, please blank it with . – Fayenatic London 15:29, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Work done on Publications
Talk:Thinking Maps

message: This page is not meant as advertising.  This "Thinking Map" stuff is popping up in a lot of public school curiculums, and I wanted to put a good article up on wikipedia to explain what this was and the pros/cons of the system.   I lazily hoped other people would contribute, hopefully this won't get deleted.  Even though this is the name of a propriatary system, it seems in use widely enough to be notable and worthy of inclusion. --Zeke pbuh (talk) 02:09, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I do wonder how much the copyrighted concept is notable versus the general, non-copyrightable idea. For instance, there is a striking resembleance between a bubble map and a mind map. What I've seen from a little cruise on the thinking map website strikes me as "yet another hype wave"; this stuff needs *independent* sourcing. --Alvestrand (talk) 06:28, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It may be "another hype wave", but it is still notable and worthy of inclusion based on its current popularity among educators.   By all means feel free to add sourced info that discredits this if you have any, or perhaps propose merging into another article if the info is too sparse to warrent its own article.  --Zeke pbuh (talk) 21:34, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's the popularity among educators that I feel needs documenting. So far, I've only seen material that relates to the people selling the concept; if the popularity that the proponents claim can be documented from reliable sources, I'm happy to have the article. --Alvestrand (talk) 06:58, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

message: I removed the following comment by  from the top of the article; it had been there since 2014 but clearly does not belong—however, on the chance there‘s something useful in it, I‘m moving it here instead of just deleting it.
—Odysseus1479 02:24, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed from article
Talk:Path of Hope

message: I am expanding the WP plot with the addition of the IMDb plot which I wrote under one of my pseudonyms circa 1999. I am releasing it for exclusive use here, and not elsewhere.The IMDb convention at that time was not to spoil the ending, so the summary ends before the resolution.The film, in my opinion, is a neorealist classic, but unfortunately it has been rather difficult to see outside of an occasional Germi retrospective.Varlaam (talk) 09:37, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  IMDb plot summary