lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Carmelita (song)

message: :Rondstadt's version includes an alternate lyric that has Ronstadt pawning her "Smith & Wesson" as opposed to Zevon's "Smith Corona":
The recording I've found of McLaughlin's version says "Smith & Wesson", so it seems like Zevon's version - while more well known - might be the alternate lyrics, and Rondstadt's are closer to the original. Anyone know what McLaughlin's original recording said?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.237.230.0 (talk) 17:50, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternate lyrics? 

message: because it needs a source, or at least more of an explaination.
:The song resembles Bob Dylan's song Desolation Row.
Does it resemble it in the chord structure?  In imagery? In length?  What?  Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 15:34, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  I moved this here 

message: I moved this from the lead to the talk page ..."The song is ostensibly about a heroin addicted writer in love with a Mexican girl, but it might be more accurate to say that it is about Los Angeles than about the character in question."
Anyone have any sources for that? Dayewalker (talk) 03:13, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Analysis 

message: Isn't it the same tune as Dylan's 1965 [Desolation Row]? Similar ambience too  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.35.82.171 (talk) 06:00, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Desolation Row
Talk:Reverse domain name notation

message: * Should this page be deleted and redirected to Reverse_DNS_lookup? -- 134.159.99.8 20:54, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening heading

message: * Examples should be more generic.
: maps.google.com -> com.google.maps etc. --86.134.154.148 (talk) 13:32, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: * Is that still an issue? The current example of "com.example.MyProduct" seems pretty generic and descriptive. Suggest to remove/archive this if not needed anymore. --invenio tc 01:44, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Examples

message: The history section gives a false assumption, although technically true. Reverse-style DNS names are much more basic and have been around for much longer than Java. In the old days of computing, many addresses were in the style now called reverse, but I can't find a good reference right now.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.85.42.110 (talk) 18:24, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: History

message: DBus uses reverse-DNS, separating components with a slash instead of a period, as unique identifiers (I think for interfaces or objects). I think this is notable enough to be in the article.190.188.180.148 (talk) 22:42, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: DBus

message: Monotone also uses Reverse-DNS for unique branch names as explained in their manual.Yselkowitz (talk) 07:53, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Monotone

message: Is this article a stub? Readers coming here will certainly be looking for a description of the point of reverse-dns name notatation; right now it leaves them hanging.
From the GNU mailing list link in the article, I gather that the purpose is to use the existing domain name ownership infrastructure to prevent name collisions rather than (insert the scheme in question here) having to deal with that themselves. However, I am just one of those readers. Paradox (talk) 05:11, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Rationale" section 

message: This article deals with the concept of reverse domain name notation rather than ways to reverse domain names. I suggest the "Code" section be removed. Magic sergeant (talk) 13:38, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, it is not relevant to the article. I will remove it. InverseHypercube (talk) 19:13, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove "Code" section 

message: Flatpak uses reverse domain name notation as unique app identifiers as well. Ashrude (talk) 18:01, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flatpak
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Highlander/Archive 1

message: I have tagged pretty much every article I could grab with my stubby fingers. I don't think I missed much, but it's still possible.
Other projects about series have listed Wikipedia:WikiProject_Television as their parent project so I had a look there. They suggest projects like us become task forces of WP Television, as explained here. What do you think ?Rosenknospe 15:42, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: HL template and WP Television
Talk:Catch Us If You Can

message: I understood this was the last song made by DC5, can anyone confirm? Jokem 02:06, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not unless The_Dave_Clark_Five#U.S._singles is really, really wrong.  Wasted Time R 22:07, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last Song
Talk:Cosmic Rough Riders

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Diannaa (talk) 23:30, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:Charmer (Kings of Leon song)

message: This article is getting outdated. It says the video is speculated to involve a hupnotitst. I've seen the video, and all it is is the band playing on a stage with a red curtain. Titan50 (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 16:38, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Cheer Down

message: Why don't Wikipedia listings give the lyrics for all these songs that are listed?  Seems like an obvious thing.  When a person looks up a song, most will be interested in seeing the lyrics, as well as the rest of the background and history, etc.  Instead, we have to go somewhere else on the internet, as they all are easily available elsewhere.
Starhistory22 (talk) 21:51, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lyrics
Talk:Miamiville, Ohio

message: Trasys???
I believe that Trasys has an office in Miamiville, based on several job listings I've seen.  However, their webpage Trasys Corporate lists their corporate headquarters in Cincinnati/Milford, and there's no listing of a branch in Miamiville.  Anybody who lives a little closer know anything further about them? Garrettmurphy 21:03, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Centrolene

message: The photograph used as an example of Centrolenes I don't think is C. prosoblepon.... arn't the spots supposed to be just little black dots, not circular ones with a offwhite interior? Not sure here as I'm no expert on the genus, just a confused citizen. Discuss...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 171.64.60.40 (talk) 23:27, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Centrolene prosoblepon?
Talk:The Philosophers' Football Match

message: I came here to get cursory information on a satirical sketch that is a classic example of why the general public is skeptical of philosophy (for a paper). I suppose I shouldn't be surprised that someone has decided it needs to be deleted based on misuse of Wikipedia guidelines.
While I'm not a regular Wikipedia editor (this is exactly why), and I don't intend to cite Wikipedia for obvious reasons (this is exactly why), I'd appreciate it if you didn't delete an article I'm using to help write my paper until I'm done with it. Also, if you want my opinion (which I'm sure you don't) the sketch is clearly culturally relevant and worth a stub, at least.
Sorry if I didn't format the talk page right.
205.206.20.35 21:09, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The joke seems to be that a footballer has been included in the German team. He is notable as the only player to sport a football kit (albeit in a red and white stripe not immediately associated with the traditional natioanal team). Apparently not included in the earlier first leg, "Bayern Becks" might at least have been expected to string together a few exisentialist long crosses with fellow midfielder Jaspers. Alas, he seems overawed by his team-mates' protracted declaimation of their philosophical positions and he neglects to kick the ball. He gets only one mention in the commentary during the game and doesn't  even participate in the post-goal protests. But 4-2-4 an obvious and tragic mistake. Martinevans123 (talk) 00:20, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: the different view @replay may be a joke in the joke, one view is onside, one view is offside.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.221.80.52 (talk) 11:20, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  offside?
Talk:Conversation theory

message: I've added some direct citations from Pask's books. The plan is to develop the article more significantly on my part. If there are any issues with what I have written or what I will write in future, feel free to change it if you feel you have adequate justification to. Anything which can improve the article impact in Wikipedia is welcome.Scibernetics Anon (talk) 21:37, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Development of article. 

message: "Conversation Theory" has a google-rate of 23.800, with hundreds of real links. It seems to be more then just an idea from Gordon Pask, but developed into a scientific paradigm, to which multiple scientists contributed. - Mdd 10:05, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Normally the evidence of notability should be provided in the form of references, as opposed to just in the list of external links.  If you'll say which ones you believe are independent reliable sources, I can help put them in as refs.  The other refs could use some work, too, to put them into a useful form. Dicklyon 17:57, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The notability of Conversation Theory 

message: * In this first edit text has been moved here from the Gordon Pask article. -- Mdd (talk) 14:30, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy-paste registration 

message: The quality of the diagrams are not really up to standard 86.9.78.134 (talk) 11:42, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diagrams in the article 
Talk:Cueva de los Guácharos

message: The name of the article should be changed to have an accent on the next-to-last a —i.e. it should read Guácharos. Is that done by moving the article and leaving a redirection stub, or what?
--Lavintzin 17:04, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name change 

message: I could not find citations to support the following section:
==Environmental issues==
Settlements for agriculture and cattle cause problems as well as the timber industry and hunting in the park grounds. Illegal crops such as coca and opium poppy (heroin) are cultivated illegally in the park.
Someone is free to add this to the article if the user can find supporting references. Seattle (talk) 03:21, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed section
Talk:Sticking coefficient

message: Sticking coefficients are often mentioned in articles on thin film growth or surface science.  The term is not commonly defined within these papers and furthermore, is relatively unknown outside of these fields. Other engineers and scientists may be puzzled by it.  I have added as a link in the article on the Langmuir --the rate of monolayer coverage-- which uses it but does not define it.Brettstrawbridge 21:12, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd have to agree that this article doesn't fall under CSD A7. Perhaps it would loosely fall under one of the CSDs, though more likely a prod, but only in its original version. thadius856talk|airports|neutrality 21:23, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I believe now that it should be transferred to Wiktionary, and I have put that template on the article.  It clearly qualifies for an entry there, since it has approximately 694,000 items containing it found from a Google search.149.169.42.207 00:25, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot 03:33, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-09-19 Automated pywikipediabot message
Talk:The College Dropout Video Anthology

message: I think it merits a page because it is an official release by a major artist, containing new music not included on other releases. It is more than a non-notable DVD release of music videos. It was certified Gold by the RIAA, marking more than 500,000 units sold. It was covered by non-trivial sources, such as VIBE Magazine and Roc-a-Fella. It is featured as a major release on the discography of Kanye West on websites such as MTV.com and BBC.co.uk.
Olsen34 21:22, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Genesis 1983–1998

message: I, for one, would really like to see a source cited for the release date information.  I have not been able to find any official confirmation of the European release date, let alone one for North America.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.236.218.36 (talk) 21:19, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: If this has indeed been released in Europe, can someone please correct the date for Knebworth.  Is it 1990 or 1992?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.254.2.213 (talk) 03:43, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is the 2 August 1992 show, on the "We Can't Dance" tour.  The show at Knebworth on 30 June 1990 was a one-off concert featurings many bands, in which they only played a short set (see Concerts at Knebworth House). — Lawrence King (talk) 04:49, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Knebworth... when??? 
Talk:Trachinocephalus myops

message: From the oldest version:
Trachinocephalus myops is known to be an aggressive predator and considered an invasive species.  It is capable of surviving four days out of water and is prized by some cooks for its ability to remain fresh in this way.Washington Post
:This was deleted for a reason. The newspaper article was discussing a freshwater fish of the genus Channa of the family Channidae, while this article is about a marine fish, Trachinocephalus myops, from a completely different family (the Synodontidae). They both happen to be called (sometimes) "snakefish". But the Washington Post article is definitely not about the subject of this Wikipedia entry, so not even remotely relevant. Cheers, Neale Monks 22:44, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: According to the FishBase Trachinocephalus myops is a synonym of the Synodus myops (Forster, 1801) . DenesFeri (talk) 14:37, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  FishBase
Talk:Japanese superstitions

message: Japan is widely considered to be the most haunted place on earth, I wonder that there is no section for it. Chris 03:55, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I agree. Japanese films creep me out.
Probably because there are insufficient Japanese editors on the English language site, and insufficient English language books about Japanese hauntings in the US.
perfectblue 08:57, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "Japan is widely considered to be the most haunted place on earth," By whom?  If we could get some information we could broaden the world-view some. ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs) 20:12, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: discussion from [[List of haunted locations]]

message: i just saw you reverted my edit. content like this should be referenced by reliable sources, otherwise it is either non-sourced or poorly sourced. i don't want to edit war so i didn't revert it. but be aware of non-reliable sources.Hfnreiwjfd (talk) 16:23, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  non sourced or poor sourced 

message: I'm making minor changes to the overview portion of this article in order to help it flow better. Although the entire article could use some help. I'm just doing this for a college course. Lululimonade (talk) 23:17, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewording Overview 

message: :
Were Japanese films the first to do this, or was it already used by Hollywood? Viriditas (talk) 21:08, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Superstition in Japanese films 

message: I discuss this more here. 
TL;DR: I'm pretty sure that this is a case where the English language originator of this claim simply made it up, and it has since proliferated due to language barrier and the difficulty to fact check against Japanese language sources. Neon Spectra (talk) 20:57, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  43 Unlucky - Dubious
Talk:Cryptorchid (song)

message: Whilst I personally like this song, the article cites no references. The article claims the song reached No. 20 in Germany however the German music chart website www.musicline.de seems to disagree. I propose this article be redirected back to the Marilyn Manson page on the grounds it is a non-notable song. I have done this once before however my edit was undone, please discuss here if you have an issue with me doing this so we can avoid an edit war. Freikorp (talk) 08:33, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed redirection
Talk:Crystal Blue Persuasion

message: 1. The mention of the fact that it sounds more like a Rascals song is pure conjecture, not a fact. Unless someone in the music business said that, it is irrelevant. State who and when, or remove it.
2. The term "Crystal Meth" did not begin to even be in use till 1980 (souce:Google NGram). So the likelihood that Tommy James knew that the word "crystal" was part of the terminology, instead of just "meth," is highly unlikely; still it should only be included if Tommy James, himself actually stated that point. 
3. An entire paragraph dedicated to e history of methamphetamines instead of describing the meaning, history and usage of the song is completely unnecessary and should be deleted. 
Pookerella (talk) 00:16, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poor, poor article. Please flag for revamp 

message: The Dave Marsh quote is also cited for the song "Draggin' the Line" (Tommy James solo) in the article on that song.  Which one is accurate?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by The tamale (talk • contribs) 14:02, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dave Marsh quote 

message: The entire paragraph about the song referencing a Watchtower Bible and Tract Society publication is about to be removed because it is entirely unsourced. The citation given doesn't even appear until after the following paragraph to begin with, and when that source is explored it turns up only two commments from visitors to the site, one of which REFUTES the claim. To include such utter speculation on the part of a single person's commment is ridiculous. Such speculation doesn't belong in any encyclopedia. I am deleting it entirely right now. SentientParadox (talk) 18:22, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsourced "Facts"

message: i fight alosing battle on this, but this shouod not be every reference to a song. it should be significant uses of the song which are important to the theme or plot or story arcs of that new work. just having it as background music is not notable. but im not gonna edit it, as i will not be around after my edits are reversed.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 04:20, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: That's too bad; I'm on your side regarding this sort of crap removal. In fact, I just did a bunch. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇  04:51, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: in culture
Talk:Marché du Film

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.marchedufilm.com/fr/actualite/the-marche-du-film-60th-anniversary-1. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Sam Sailor 08:58, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Charleville Castle

message: The language and style of this article seem unusually flamboyant. Was it taken from a press release? The haunting home of Ireland's druids, indeed! TRiG (talk) 23:16, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Really? 

message: The history section has been copied directly from the official website.  I followed the link to learn more and found myself recognizing the words.
Elainemahler (talk) 15:30, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagarism 

message: The article sounds more like a tour guide then an encyclopedic entry.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.76.69.33 (talk) 08:24, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hackish 
Talk:Adare Manor

message: Please note https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:COI#Paid_advocacy.2C_public_relations.2C_and_marketing. Drow69 (talk) 15:45, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  A note to "Adare Manor" 
Talk:Ballinacarriga Castle

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Theleftorium (talk) 18:12, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Baron Bourke of Castleconnell

message: Hi, I have noticed that Burke and Bourke seem to be used interchangeably (Sir Richard and Sir David Burke being ancestors of Baron Bourkes). Did any of the Clanwilliam Burkes actually continue to use the Burke spelling or was it used at all? ᚴᛁᚾᚷ ᚼᛒ Talk, Guestbook 20:20, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Burke/Bourke