lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Starfleet International

message: Just need to let everyone know that a main article on the Commanders, STARFLEET would be most likely be considered inappropriate to the Wikipedia administrators.  If it is created it will MOST LIKELY be targeted for DELETION by the said administrators.
I am attempting to get up website that has the information I have for the Unofficial History of STARFLEET.  You can click [HERE].
--Hawk 20:35, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commanders, STARFLEET & Temp Unoffical History Website 

message: There's a lot of grammatical cleanup needed in this article, some spliced sentences and so on... anyone wanna make a run at cleaning it up?
Teekno 14:12, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: I am worried that we might have some NPOV issues here... specifically regarding the reference to the McGinnis years, and to a lesser extent, the "important" CQ issue with the historian content... thoughts? Teekno 16:13, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV? 

message: Is the name capitalized for a reason? Is it an acronym/initialism? --jazzle 11:55, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalization? 

message: Can someone please look at the dates in that section? It seems the May '74 event would make more sense happening after the Oct '74 event, but that's not how it reads. Are the dates wrong or is the text vague? --EEMIV (talk) 12:56, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Founding 

message: Yet the article does not mention him.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Darktangent (talk • contribs) 22:46, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirected from Eric A. Stillwell 

message: I do not thing that the comment "After the tightest result in recent memory, Vice Admiral David Blaser..." fits with encyclopedic language. JesseMSmith (talk) 07:23, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent Election 

message: After being redirected to the SFI page from "The Communiqué", I find that there is no mention of the newsletter in the whole article.  Any problems with adding, or plans to add, a description, history, summary, statistics and/or purpose of the newsletter?   CrowdedWords (talk) 01:58, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Communiqué 

message: While the AfD is underway, I've made the following general edits:
* Eschewed references to titles based on make-believe rank structure, e.g. "fleet admiral," when the "title" has a real-world corporate equivalent in the organization's charter, e.g. "president."
* Copyedited for wordiness and redundancy
* Removed overlinking
* Removed trivial history of shifts in job titles, numbers of position-holders
* Removed unnecessary section about "governing documents" and parliamentary procedure. An external link to those docs might be appropriate.
Please feel free to offer rationales substantiated by references to Wikipedia policies and guidelines to justify any kind of restoration of this excised content. --EEMIV (talk) 19:48, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits
Talk:2nd Brigade Combat Team, 1st Cavalry Division (United States)

message: Do sub-units of divsions really need need their own articles? This is getting ridiculous. Every *@!!# brigade should have an article? These can be reduced to a paragraph inside the particular division's article. Most of these are cut and paste jobs from army sites without any attempt at converting them to NPOV or wikifying. Chrissakes, "...the brigade returned to Ft Hood. Black Jack Brigade was called upon once again to be America's Vanguard." Incidentally, just because Peter Schoomaker decides, incorrectly, that the word "soldier" should always be capitalized and then orders all official military documents, press releases, magazines, newspapers, etc. to follow suit, doesn't mean that wikipedia has to follow. I'm considering posting this rant on every unit talk page... Nobunaga24 07:02, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments
Talk:Casomorphin

message: in this dif you removed content that is "seemingly contradicted by the EFSA review (See Conclusions, §4.5,4.4, §3.2)"   I don't find anyplace where the EFSA report says the peptides of concern are actually made in humans.  can you be more specific?  thanks. Jytdog (talk) 20:55, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  production of peptides in humans
Talk:Albin Countergambit

message: I am having trouble seeing how the underpromotion at move 7 (fxg1=N) is mate when the rook can capture the newly aquired knight (h1xg1). White is still in a difficult situation, but it is not mate. White can trade queens if the chance remains (though unlikely) but white is up a piece. Am I missing something with the rook capturing the knight?
:The underpromotion isn't mate, but if the rook takes on g1, Bg4+ wins the white queen. More detail on the continuations is given under Lasker Trap. WarmasterKron 10:10, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Music While You Work

message: "...accompany the working day in factories and fields"???  
 
Can anyone find confirmation that MWYW entertainment was actually aimed at outdoor field workers??  What was the state of mobile public address systems in the 1940s and 1950s??   JXM 07:13, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, you're probably right, that is pushing it a bit. It was certainly used in factories though. I probably had the episode of Dad's Army called "All is Safely Gathered in" in mind. I will change it - thanks.Rob 08:41, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Query over usage

message: Quote: ...broadcast twice daily in the United Kingdom on the BBC General Forces Programme. It began broadcasting in June 1940 ...
Well, the programme cannot have been broadcast in the General Forces Programme in 1940, since that station did not come on air until 1944, although it is more than likely that the GFP did carry MWYW between the ending of the Forces Programme and the opening of the Light Programme. I believe that from the start MWYW was carried by both the Home Service and the Forces Programme. I certainly remember one daily edition at least being broadcast simultaneously by both Home and Light for many postwar years. (Currently looking for references and dates: can anyone beat me to it?) -- Picapica 13:13, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  BBC station carrying MWYW 

message: Music While You Work is currently played at 9:30-10:00 on weekdays on internet radio station Serenade Radio.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.102.38.105 (talk) 09:16, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Serenade Radio
Talk:Laura Busson

message: Does this person even need an article?
—Preceding unsigned comment added by User:212.74.96.196 (talk • contribs) 
:I would say yes. She is currently on BBC Radio 1 with listenership figures in their millions, and is taking part in a national tour, complete with 6-foot high pictures of herself all over the bus. She is also featured on the Internet, including her own dedicated "mini-site" hosted by the BBC, at http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio1/laura/
-=# Amos E Wolfe talk #=- 12:12, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Can anyone confirm whether Laura's Diary is in fact, as it sounds, a work of complete fiction? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.36.228.184 (talk) 20:03, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fact or fiction? 
Talk:Alexandra von Fürstenberg

message: According to the Genealogisches Handbuch Des Adels Fürstlich Häuser of 1991, the last time the House of Fürstenberg was included in what is widely regarded as the most authoritative genealogical source on royal and noble houses still in print, the marriage of (the late) Prince Egon zu Fürstenberg to Diane Halfin is accepted by the family as dynastic. The son of that marriage is listed with the rest of the family in the second section (non-dynastic issue are listed in the third section, when included at all) on page 261, as "Pr. Alexandre Egon, * New York 16.2.1979". Unless there is some evidence that the marriage of Alexandre Egon to Alexandra Miller was non-dynastic, the grounds cited for moving this article are factually incorrect and a revert is in order. 
If the basis for moving the article is that "zu" was used with the princely title instead of "von", then the correct particule could easily have been substituted rather than the entire article moved.
But if the basis for moving the article is that the subject thereof actually uses "Alexandra von Fürstenberg" and does not use the princely title (other than in purely American venues), fine: so long as this now becomes the applicable precedent when other biographical entries are named in compliance with their subjects' (or guardians') apparent preference, rather than in conformity with some other rule or rationale, e.g. Bismarck, Lady Louise Windsor, Hohenlohe-Schillingsfurst, etc.Lethiere 07:40, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Move from Princess Alexandra von Fürstenberg
Talk:Dromedary bag

message: I think this is a useful tool used by many backpackers.  It may not be very interesting, but it does serve a purpose.  it may not have a lot of content now, but it needs to start somewhere.  look at the hammer, it has developed into a lengthy article.  give it time and this may grow too.  isn't that the wikipedia way??
Jbabin 07:44, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Redirects/California

message: We're pretty much done with creating the California State Route * articles, not counting the pre-1964 legislative routes.  Now for the redirects and completing the articles, especially the stubs. --Geopgeop 07:50, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh how cool! But yeah we need to solve the naming too. :( --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs)  05:17, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Naming
Talk:One Cold Night

message: 13. "The Gift" [Alternate Mix] - 4:24
Is that song really on the CD?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Xehpuk (talk • contribs) 23:28, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it is. --How may I serve you? Marshall Williams2  Talk Autographs Contribs 01:51, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Track listing
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Minnesota

message: I've been working on sourcing List of Minnesota placenames of Native American origin and I've run into a number of issues sourcing some Dakota and Ojibwe origin placenames. I listed the issues on the talk page for anyone willing to help out. Pingnova (talk) 17:04, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help! Dakota and Ojibwe placenames 

message: Hello! On behalf of businessman Richard M. Schulze, I've submitted an edit request to update the poorly written Philanthropy section of his biography. None of the claims I've proposed are contentious, but I do not edit the main space because of my conflict of interest. Since the edit request mentions his Minneapolis-based foundation as well as select projects related to Minnesota, I am curious if any WikiProject Minnesota members would be willing to take a look. Thanks in advance for any feedback or article updates! Inkian Jason (talk) 16:45, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The request has been reviewed. Inkian Jason (talk) 14:56, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Richard M. Schulze request 

message: :Minneapolis, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has an RfC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. -SusanLesch (talk) 23:21, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:Minneapolis]] has an [[WP:RFC|RfC]]

message: Wayzata Bay Center has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:58, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good article reassessment for [[Wayzata Bay Center]] 

message: Greetings, , , , and . Could one or all of you possibly find the time to read through Minneapolis and either be bold and move out some content, or suggest what you think can be moved?
In the Minneapolis FAR, Z1720 requests that:  
Thank you all. -SusanLesch (talk) 16:49, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minneapolis needs your edits 

message: Hi editors! I'm Kim and I work for H.B. Fuller. I was hoping to expand the stub on the company and made a request I think will help beef things up while keeping it neutral. Would anyone here be interested in reviewing? KS at HB Fuller (talk) 21:51, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  H.B. Fuller
Talk:Ethel MacDonald

message: * https://www.scotsman.com/arts-and-culture/books/book-review-an-anarchist-s-story-the-life-of-ethel-macdonald-1-1034370
** Archive
czar 02:11, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potential source
Talk:Indian Posse

message: I've added a discussion and ref from CISC that clearly establishes notability for this gang. Mmoyer 02:30, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: I have assessed this as a Stub, as it only contains the basic information on the subject, and of low importance, as I do not feel that this topic is essential for understanding Canada. Cheers, CP 01:07, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment 

message: This page is causing a circular reference.
TheDoDahMan (talk) 09:55, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recommend speedy deletion
Talk:Adam Hollioake

message: When did Adam Hollioake win Wisden Cricketer of the Year? --BaHaReep 08:24, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Wisden Cricketers of the Year says he did in 2003, along with Matthew Hayden, Nasser Hussain, Shaun Pollock and Michael Vaughan. -- ALoan (Talk) 11:10, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This list says that Adam went to Joeys. But if he moved to England at age 12 and Joeys starts at Year 7 then how would that have worked ? Drop a note on my talk-page if you can shed light.-Sticks66 13:05, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  School in Sydney ? 

message: OK, so I'm led to believe by edit summaries that there are legal issues surrounding the subject of this article, possibly in association with Du'aine Ladejo. Certainly there seem to be all sorts of attack sites over the web which look to my eye to have been set up to push POV. I can only go on what I can find in reliable sources - I know that the Hollioake group was wound up for example - this source and company records confirm that. That seems to confirm some of the details in this report which also states, quite clearly, that Hollioake and Ladejo created Quiet Storm Productions which owned the Greatest Athlete concept - and has various copyrights for it all round the world.
Now, given that there seems to evidence to suggest that what's in the article is correct, I'd ask anyone who wants to contest it to show us why it shouldn't be there please - I get the impression that various legal and personal disputes have spread over from other areas of the web to wikipedia with some evidence of clear attempts to push POV and edit war using the encyclopedia. Partly because of the deliberate misinformation being spread by various parties it seems very difficult to find anything particularly concrete other than the sources I've mentioned above, so I'd appreciate a little help on this one please. Thanks. Blue Square Thing (talk) 20:42, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I should add that, given my concerns about this, I've asked for advice and comment at WP:BLPN. Thanks Blue Square Thing (talk) 20:55, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legal issues 
Talk:Jacobin (disambiguation)

message: I was good intentioned, but have found myself in over my head and need help. I moved "Jacobin" to "Jacobin (disambiguation)", intending then to move "Jacobin (politics) to "Jacobin". I felt the (politics) article was the most notable of the disambiguated articles and the most like to be sought by a reader doing a search. Well I discovered a) I cannot do the second move because the name conflicts, and b) an old discussion on Talk:Jacobin (politics) had resulted in exactly the opposite renaming. (That is, I was inadvertently undoing the agree-to work of others.) Can I now have an administrator help me put things right?  Jacobin (politics) should be left as it is; my "Jacobin (disambiguation)" should be move back to "Jacobin". Make sense?  I do apologize. Hult041956 23:43, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: - fixed :) - Alison ❤ 04:25, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, Alison.  The requested move now having been done, should we remove the requested moves category tag? Hult041956 17:44, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed the requested move tag since the move has been completed --Lox (t,c) 13:33, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:Seudah shlishit

message: Sorry about the way this article looks right now - I have to go to sleep. Feel free to fix it up before I get around to it. --DLand 08:32, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The article

message: Can anyone find a source for an obligation to recite a kiddush at seuda shlishi?  I have never seen such a thing and both for my own edification and for the article  Ithink we ought to have a source for that.  Avraham 06:08, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Rambam (Mishneh Torah, Shabbat 29:9) says that you should be kove'a every meal on bread and wine. Most people (I believe) do not make kiddush or drink wine at all at seudah shlishit, in accordance with the psak of the Shulchan Aruch (following the Rosh) that this is not necessary. Even within the position of the Rambam, most commentators (eg. Beit Yosef) hold that he is not referring to kiddush, but merely that one should drink wine. The only place where it is brought down that one should make kiddush is in the siddur of the Shelah ("Sha'ar HaShamayim"), a kabbalistic source. I guess you have some homework to do now... :) --DLandTALK 22:35, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: sources
Talk:List of Death Row Records artists

message: Both 2Pac and Lisa Lopes were signed to Death Row Records at the time of their deaths.  Death Row still owns the masters to their recorded material and lists them on their active roster (even on the official site when it's running).  This is because they have the rights to release any material from either of the two on any given project under the Death Row label.  This has been proven for the last 10 years for 2Pac on almost every Death Row release since his death, and has been proven with Lopes on the Dysfunktional Family soundtrack.  Until any official source reads otherwise, it's safe to cite both 2Pac and Lisa Lopes on the active roster. UDStyle Stranded On Death Row 02:06, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think since original Death Row had announced bankrupcy, the I.R.S. sold all of their license rights to make money to pay the dept of the label. Isn't it so? So these two artists cannot be resigned to a new label, but the old one could have lost all of their recordings...Lajbi Holla @ me 12:48, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, Suge Knight reportedly still owns the masters and all rights pertaining to Death Row Records. As of yet the only thing that has been sold regarding master recordings is a couple tracks that Suge sold Afeni for the Pac's Life album. In essence, when you file for chapter 11, you do not have to lose any materials owned. Furthermore as of last check Death Row still lists 2Pac and N.I.N.A. in their artist roster. UDStyle 04:20, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 2Pac & N.I.N.A. still on Death Row

message: Petey Pablo no longer on Death Row.
:Dearly noted and changes have been made to the article accordingly. UDStyle 04:21, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Petey Pablo

message: Is it necessary or appropriate to include this section on a page solely dedicated to the signed artist roster? UDStyle Stranded On Death Row 21:42, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Since no debate about this has taken place I removed the other categories that had nothing to do with artists who had contractual obligations to Death Row Records.  Until sufficient reason is given as to why they should be present on this wiki I do not think it is appropriate to have categories such as "Associates of Death Row" and "Past and present enemies" should be included on this article. UDStyle 05:15, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Enemies of Death Row inclusion?
Talk:Honeywell UOP

message: Article needs work, but this is a billion dollar company.  Their processes make a big chunk of the refining and petrochemical industry go. Don't delete.  --John Nagle 08:38, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Interesting comment by John...above a billion dollar company hardly anyone ever heard of.  I worked for the firm and much of the rewrite is drawn from an article published by a former co-worker named James Johnson.  The data contained within the American Chemical Society reference has a lot more of interest and a large amount of data can be written about the firm.  I have attempted to make the Adsorption separation technology area easy enough for a freshman high school student to understand.   This technology alone deserves it's own separate page and perhaps someone may wish to add that.  Notice the press given to Fluid catalytic cracking. If someone would please dig out their 75 year history of UOP book this page could use the references to company early years, the teams that went to oil refinery towns searching for proof, and facts that UOP was world's largest buyer of platinum. Pbmaise (talk) 10:21, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Extensive rewrite October 2011

message: I have updated and merged the two identical ACS links and added wiki links to those articles. I am the program coordinator of the ACS-NHCL program. KLindblom (talk) 17:31, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Update External Link

message: I have a WP:COI with Honeywell. I added an image Honeywell contributed of their refinery under a Creative Commons license as a non-controversial edit. Corporate Minion 23:00, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image
Talk:Catalan Bay

message: I have found this on the Catalan wikipedian entry for Catalan Bay, I traduce literally:
"The name <<Catalan>> is due to the 350 Catalan’s battalion who participated within the Anglo-Dutch expedition who conquered the rock, on 1704, during the war of Spanish Succession. Was on Catalan Bay where this battalion landed and stayed to defend the place. Some Minorcan emigrants came also after the Treaty of Utrecht, in which Phillip V of Castilia ceded Gibraltar and Minorca to the Great Britain."
Is it that true? If it's so, it should be remarked on this article. 
Indeed, it is consistent with the fact that La Caleta, the traditional name given to this place is Catalan. In Spanish would be "Calita" instead of "Caleta". It is only a speculation, but I wonder if most of the inhabitants of this place would have a Catalan origin instead of Genoese. It was a quite common misunderstanding at that time to confuse Catalans with Genoese sailors by the similar way they were dressed. Maybe those Catalans and Minorcan (Catalan speakers too) took advantage of this misunderstanding to hide their origin after the war, to prevent themselves from the rage of their neighbouring Spaniards, who would consider them as traitors.
I've found few references about this fact, not even in Gibraltarian sources. Has anyone better information?
La Caleta is the traditional name and it is not a catalan name a all, there are a lot of La Caleta throughout of andalusian coast.Catalan were not traitors, they along with Dutch batallion only were cheated or manipulated by English Army. English were the traitors as they were suppossed to be Allieds of Spain. As for the Minorcan emigrants, why they went from Minorca to Gibraltar? Escapeing from English?? In my opinion all your teory is really nosense. Andalusian.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.229.55.86 (talk) 20:21, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled