Talk:Kebaya

message: Is that the best Kebaya pic we could find? --Merbabu 13:32, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There are a lot of better pics, better representatives of Kebaya, but it's not easy to find one without copyright issue..... Matahari Pagi 02:36, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is baju kurung a kebaya?Aren't they different? I doubt the baju kurung variety of kebaya.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.9.247.22 (talk) 14:11, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  kebaya and baju kurung 

message: Errr...Excuse me, but that's not a modern kebaya, that's a Nonya/Nyonya Kebaya, traditionally worn (and popularized) by the Peranakan Chinese (Strait Chinese who've adapted themselves to their new home and culture in Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore), and I don't think the ladies in that particular pic are Indonesians either.Matahari Pagi 08:45, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Change. As requested.Serenity id (talk) 04:09, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Modern kebaya worn by Indonesian women" pic 

message: I've edited this part "The kain-kebaya came to Indonesia from Malaysia and gained... "
Reference, please. Matahari Pagi (talk) 08:03, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's the reference at the end of the next sentence - i've now listed it twice. The whole article should be checked especially after User:Starstyler's edits which often don't bear much resemblance to the references he produces. --Merbabu (talk) 08:19, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  From Malaysia? 

message: What kind of kebaya are there in Malaysia? Hati Kama (talk) 12:10, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: 
 Kebaya Malaysia 


message: Hi, I already put all the references correctly but some editors just like to revert them without reason... MrCattttt (talk) 01:01, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, thank you for your edit. I was reverted that anonymous edits because the information (narration) is contradicted with the stable version. Plus the history is already mentioned in the etymology and history sections. So that, no need to make it double and raising ambiguity. —Ibra Bintang (talk) 01:50, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

text: I do suspect as well. He/she/they does/do not just socking once, yet in many times. If it's unsettling, we could ask for semi-protection edit request and open the case. —Ibra Bintang (talk) 06:13, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Malaysia 

message: Kebaya blouse is traditionally made of thin and sheer materials, sometimes made of brocade. This fact is well referenced and supported in parts of this article. 
Then the user MrCatttt through his edit add this section  in lead, which is unref and do not suits the common traits of kebaya, which is sheer and thin materials. Then insistently recovered here and here. 
My argument is songket and tenun (and to some extent, actually batik too) is traditionally used as the lower part (kain/sarong part), not for the kebaya blouse itself. Kebaya is thin and sheer, sometimes intricate brocade blouse. The use of thick woven materials such as songket and sarong-like woven tenun as kebaya materials is relatively a "new" creation that actually not in accordance to the traditional kebaya. As the matter of fact, the use of printed batik as kebaya blouse materials, as it has been done by Singapore and Malaysian Airlines, is actually a rather new creation and thus not in accordance to a traditional kebaya style. MrCatttt argue that  Well then, please move that sentences to the Malaysian section, and do not put them in the lead. Since this uncommon practice is not shared by the whole of kebaya traditions. Gunkarta  talk  06:29, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for doing this, instead of reverting my edit every time for different reasons. I'm not sure why is this so controversial. The lead should be as "general" as possible and sometimes would not even need a citation Wikipedia:How to create and manage a good lead section#References in the lead?. Not all kebaya are made of thin and sheer materials. For instance, kebaya labuh, kebaya riau Pahang, kebaya Selangor, kebaya setengah tiang are made out of songket or tenun (especially for wedding), while kuyu Kebaya, keraton or Solo kebaya are made out of velvet. Where did you get the idea that kebaya, in general, is sheer and thin materials.? Nevertheless, I already put a reference just in case.MrCattttt (talk) 09:17, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Kebaya materials

message: I have checked most of the article and removed sentences/claim that don't bear much resemblance to the references aka OR. I will update this page from time to time to fulfil the good article requirements.MrCattttt (talk) 23:50, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: OR

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:58, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: Hi everyone, I'll just be making a small edit in the Sundanese kebaya section.--CarmenBanks (talk) 10:13, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A little additional information regarding the Sundanese Kebaya 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:12, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: Why all of a sudden the article about Kebaya is this long? probably it already violated some Wikipedia rules. 2001:448A:10A2:1723:FCC6:5382:D9FA:4927 (talk) 09:52, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The article is god damn long