Talk:Stock character

message: --200.163.21.214 02:13, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: *I want to! (advocate for keeping them, I mean).  I thorougly take your point and you're right in terms of role.  However, I think there are stock characters here as well.  If I understand you, you mean hero (role) who may be any of a variety of types (usually protagonist, sometimes not), in a variety of genres.  I think there is also hero (stereotype) or (plot device) [and villain, similarly] who are stock characters.  Like so many terms in the performing arts, these words are fluid (compare, e.g. ingenue (actress) and ingenue (role) and ingenue (stock character).  The difference should be pointed out. Quill 05:58, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I'm a bit skeptical. Maybe if the entry here makes the distinction clear on what a hero stock character is and how it differs from the role. -- Logotu 17:57, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I think the current list format is tedious to the eye. It's very difficult to discern between to subsequent entries, as the entry name is in the same font as the whole wall of text. I'd rather see the entry names, like The California Girl or The Twins, as nth level headings, not as plain text. Example:
----
: This is the current formatting
=== Transient ===
*The Angst-ridden Youth:  a young male character, usually handsome and virile, but conflicted, sullen, and at odds with the establishment.  Epitomized by James Dean of Rebel Without a Cause and Holden Caulfield of The Catcher in the Rye.  Anakin Skywalker is such a character before transforming to Dark Lord as Darth Vader.  Another example is Squall Leonhart, from the video game Final Fantasy VIII.
*The Avenger:  a hot-blooded young man who has had a loved one (usually a fiancée or wife) cruelly murdered and/or raped and seeks his revenge outside the law. Batman, Laertes in Hamlet and Hamlet himself, as well as Amsterdam from the film Gangs of New York, are examples of Avengers.  Eric from the film The Crow is another example. Marvel's Elektra is a female version of this character.  Can often be the son of a Rake (see below).
----
: This is what I'd like it to be
=== Transient ===
====The Angst-ridden Youth====
A young male character, usually handsome and virile, but conflicted, sullen, and at odds with the establishment.  Epitomized by James Dean of Rebel Without a Cause and Holden Caulfield of The Catcher in the Rye.  Anakin Skywalker is such a character before transforming to Dark Lord as Darth Vader.  Another example is Squall Leonhart, from the video game Final Fantasy VIII.
==== The Avenger====
A hot-blooded young man who has had a loved one (usually a fiancée or wife) cruelly murdered and/or raped and seeks his revenge outside the law. Batman, Laertes in Hamlet and Hamlet himself, as well as Amsterdam from the film Gangs of New York, are examples of Avengers.  Eric from the film The Crow is another example. Marvel's Elektra is a female version of this character.  Can often be the son of a Rake (see below).
----
I don't mind lists in general, but this page has way too many entries to be a comfortable read. --130.232.206.95 07:45, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page formatting 

message: ====The Angst-ridden Youth====
A young male character, usually handsome and virile, but conflicted, sullen, and at odds with the establishment.  Epitomized by James Dean of Rebel Without a Cause and Holden Caulfield of The Catcher in the Rye.  Anakin Skywalker is such a character before transforming to Dark Lord as Darth Vader.  Another example is Squall Leonhart, from the video game Final Fantasy VIII.
==== The Avenger====
A hot-blooded young man who has had a loved one (usually a fiancée or wife) cruelly murdered and/or raped and seeks his revenge outside the law. Batman, Laertes in Hamlet and Hamlet himself, as well as Amsterdam from the film Gangs of New York, are examples of Avengers.  Eric from the film The Crow is another example. Marvel's Elektra is a female version of this character.  Can often be the son of a Rake (see below).
----
I don't mind lists in general, but this page has way too many entries to be a comfortable read. --130.232.206.95 07:45, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transient 

message: A hot-blooded young man who has had a loved one (usually a fiancée or wife) cruelly murdered and/or raped and seeks his revenge outside the law. Batman, Laertes in Hamlet and Hamlet himself, as well as Amsterdam from the film Gangs of New York, are examples of Avengers.  Eric from the film The Crow is another example. Marvel's Elektra is a female version of this character.  Can often be the son of a Rake (see below).
----
I don't mind lists in general, but this page has way too many entries to be a comfortable read. --130.232.206.95 07:45, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''The [[Avenger]]''

message: Check the article List of stereotypical characters in the world of drama for more stock characters. Peter S. 12:37, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The problem is that the two ideas have become confused.  Classic stock characters (the sidekick) are NOT merely modern stereotypes (Afro-American saying 'yo!' alot) but the latter have crept into this article. Quill 23:07, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  More Characters 

message: Is there any reason the Fearless leader isn't on here? If there's none of these categories he [it] fits in, it should be added.
: On a related note, shouldn't there also be a listing for the Military Man, the stern authoritarian who ignores casualties or human compassion for the cause of victory, like Buck Turdigson in Dr. Strangelove (and perhaps, to a greater extent, Scott's depiction of Patton) or the Pogue Colonel in Full Metal Jacket? --YoungFreud 00:34, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fearless Leader 

message: Discussion moved to a single place: Talk:List of stereotypical characters in the world of drama. mikka (t) 21:41, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: "# The California Girl, a blonde-haired, blue-eyed girl who only ate health food and loved the environment more than anything else.
# The nerd who was a total genius, wore geeky clothes, and was the teacher's pet.
# The Clumsy Hero. a good meaning person, but usually accidently destroys friend and foe alike. ie. Coop of Megas XLR"
I don't think "The nerd who was a total genius ... pet" really belongs as a separate category; after all, under Whiz kid, it says "Male whiz kids are often referred to as "geeks" or "nerds" by other characters, while their female counterparts are typically called "know-it-alls." Ergo, I don't think that that would belong as a separate category. The other two I don't really know about.
Shouldn't Mad Scientist and Evil Genius be merged? Evil Genius could be given as a variant villainous version of the Mad Scientist.
: --207.192.229.226 01:57, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whiz kid/nerd 

message: Seeing "The California Girl" shows up reminds me -- I'd really like to cut back on this list. Having a generic list of "Stock characters" is not really useful, as it can grow at an incredible rate. The idea of the list at first had been to provide a few examples of what a stock character could be, not to provide an exhaustive list. There are currently several other more exhaustive lists of characters in specific genres -- I think it makes sense to move items to those lists or create new lists (e.g. "Stock characters in Cinema") but to leave this page as a discussion of the concept of stock characters in general with a *brief* (3-4 members) list left only as an example. Tom
:If this is judged desirable, the fairest solution would appear to be to spin off the list of stock characters into a new article, list of stock characters.  Leaving just a few of them presents the problem of which ones are chosen to be representative, and may represent the worst possible outcome.  The feeling of a substantial minority of users is hostile to articles that are lists of anything, and prefers to merge any lists within articles about the concept illustrated by the list — the status quo here.  I am indifferent one way or another, and will cheerfully adapt to whatever consensus preferred.  I do think the text should go into a bit more detail about how stock characters are used in general, and relate them to genre conventions.  Smerdis of Tlön 14:13, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: My experience of pop-culture articles like this, where everyone's trying to cram in their favourite example, is that a core article with a spun-off list article is the best way to preserve everyone's sanity, and to limit an information overload in one article. Just my 2c.  RMoloney 10:21, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm inclined to agree. My immediate reaction on seeing "California Girl" was to respond "Hey, there's a bit of difference between California Girl and Ms. Natural..." and you can see where that would go. Also, I'm interested in the slight difference between stock characters in Euro vs. Asian portrayals, say, in classical wuxia.--Bluejay Young 20:47, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cutting 

message: "The Odd Couple (strong silent hero with free-spirited buddy; snarky individualist hero with buddy who plays by the rules). Or the Mentor and the Student. The Brothers In Arms. The Adversaries. The Sworn Enemies. The Loner, the Geek, the Mild Mannered Reporter." Yeah! Pairings. --Bluejay Young 01:00, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Pairings: Overheard in a chat

message: This page is getting quite long, and I feel that it does not do justice to the relationship between stock characters and genre. I suggest splitting off new pages, such as Stock Characters in Science Fiction, Stock Characters in Westerns, etc.  That way, we could trim down the interminably growing list of examples of stock characters at the bottom of this page (as there really is no end to the examples that could be cited). Any thoughts?
Feeeshboy 04:10, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that the article is definitely too long. The history section on that article is also awkward to read. I suggest trimming down the history a little bit and splitting up the list of stock characters  under "drama," "comedy,", and "romance" categories with only one or two examples for each listed character. Anyone agree? I'd be glad to be the one to do it. Breed Zona 01:06, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The history is more appropriate than the list.  Perhaps we should split off a "List of stock characters."  Or perhaps we should give them their own articles and then refer the reader to the Category of stock characters.Goldfritha 01:34, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that the history is far more pertinent than the rest of this page.  Should we go for one list, or break it up in some way?  I'd still ideally like to break it up by genre to both better show the connection between genres and stock characters and avoid just having another overlong page.  My concern is that this is going to be entirely original research.  Either way, we should do something soon, because this is getting ridiculous when someone is replacing characters from major motion pictures with characters from (various incarnations of) Final Fantasy.  Wikipedia is not a soapbox to vote for your favorite book/movie/webcomic/video game, or an experiment in democracy/anarchy. I don't want to say that my examples are better than anyone else's, but this page needs a new format fast before it gets buried in more and more obscure and unnecessary examples.  For now, I don't think there's any reason that a type of stock character should require more than three or four examples.  Feeeshboy 03:23, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I've just done some revision on the Heroes section of the stock characters' list. Even with just that, I was taken aback by the amount of references and "filler" in there. I deleted all the references to "Watership Down," keeping only the examples that would be recognized the most, although I didn't delete any listed stock characters. The history part is informative for the most part, and it needs just a little cleaning up. 
I agree with Feeeshboy that the history section should be kept on the main article and that the list of stock characters should be split up in genres before this article gets too unwieldy. Anybody care to revise the other character sections? (looks around hopefully) I'll probably split up the page tomorrow, and see how that helps. Breed Zona 04:35, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, I've just done a MAJOR splitting up of the list into various lists, and also reduced each character's references to only two or three at a time; the links are near the bottom of the page. I know that I have not added the typical Category links to the bottom of these pages. Could somebody please do this? Breed Zona 17:50, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Good job with the split. 24.126.199.129 03:20, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split Page up? 

message: Which ones are the "moral types" and which are the "social types"? 24.126.199.129 03:23, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately, I do not know. A better resource for this would be a specific website about these characters. If you want, feel free to link to in-depth, informative websites that provide more information than this article does. Thanks for your above compliment, by the way. :) Breed Zona 03:11, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Theophrastus characters

message: So I've come back to this article for a little cleaning-up.  After doing a lengthy reading and correcting tenses and awkward phrases, I began to wonder if the historical information was a little too detailed.  That's probably a good thing in an encyclopedia, but I think people who go to this article for just a general idea of what a stock character is, would be lost in the incredibly detailed facts and types.  Since I know that the person who added this historical info clearly put a lot of time into it, I suggest that we split up this article (again) into two:  one about the general idea and concept of the stock character, and the other containing the details for history/character buffs.  Anyone else have an opinion on this?  If no one replies within a month to this posting, I'll go ahead with the split.
There's also a lack of references to certain speculative or hypothetical information.  Anyone willing to do this job, since I'm not in the mood to do something like this right now? --Breed Zona 01:52, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Concerns about quality of article

message: Can we have a segment about how stock charcters are being parodied, like the Mad Scientist and all the rest? Corrupt one (talk) 00:07, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parody of Stock Characters? 

message: :For example, Hephaestus, Hermes, and Prometheus represented the fool character as "jesters to the gods."
I'm not intimately familiar with the work of Aeschylus, Sophocles, or Euripides but I'm pretty good with my Greek mythology and this seems rather absurd to me. None of these figures says "jester" to me, and as far as I know that role is played usually by gods like Dionysus or Pan. Am I wrong in this context? If not I'll remove this line in a day or so. Sc00baSteve (talk) 23:17, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Greek Gods

message: I've just removed a couple large blocks of text which have no sources, appear to be an original essay, which only tangentially relate to stock characters.  Per the discussion above, this extensive history doesn't inform the concept of stock character, and provides excrutiating detail which would need to be supported by reliable sourcing.  If anyone feels that this content was particularly valuable as relating to the concept of stock character, please discuss this on the talk page, and bring some reliable sources so that the overall context and weight can be reviewed. aprock (talk) 18:39, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Usourced essays 

message: Currently the lead says:
     A stock character is a stereotypical person whom audiences readily recognize from frequent recurrences in a particular literary tradition.
But aren't stock characters recurring in all sorts of media such as films and video games as well in contemporary society? The sentence above should hence be changed appropriatly. Could someone do that?
--Fixuture (talk) 11:33, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stock characters are not just recurring in literature 

message: I am unsure about how exactly to put it in the text, but I know that the full quote is 
 When, after Cicero and Quintilian, oratory began to decline, and after the second century survived only in the hands of professional sophists whose goal was brilliance and entertainment, the emphasis shifted to delivery and ornament and a perverse admiration for decorum and appropriateness.
and it was published in the SUSQUEHANNA UNIVERSITY STUDIES which is online available here: https://archive.org/details/susquehannaunive08susq  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.189.176.168 (talk) 15:40, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quote needs citation