Talk:Knowledge economy

message: found that a majority of this article comes directly from [http://www.skyrme.com/insights/21gke.htm DavidSkyme's The Global Knowledge Economy:
and its implication for markets]
not saying thats bad, that article is free.
It is not true, that Porter invented "knowledge worker". It was rather Machlup in 1960s.
Too much about this 1966 book. It may have defined some useful terms, but how the author knew that these would happen soon is very clever. More sources needed. Suggest leave this as "one interpretation" or combine with The information age and digital age and digital revolution in line with 5 pillars. oops not logged in (this is user:victuallers
:Actually, it's not OK that this article was copied from that page; the copyright page says that permission is required before distribution to more than 10 people, and the page itself says no commercial use (which is incompatible with Wikipedia's license terms). -- Beland (talk) 16:15, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: material copied

message: Found that the last two external links actually point to websites only indirectly (and in a non relevant way) to the concept of 'knowledge economy':
who42.com (Human Capital for the Knowledge Economy) : seems just to be a consulting firm/company website
http://kesp2007.wetpaint.com/ seems more like a community/social website related somehow to KESP (http://www.kesp.ie/).
If nobody disagree i would delete both of them relatively soon. user:poderi  —Preceding comment was added at 16:39, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: external links

message: The following articles (and possibly more!) all deal with very similar, very closely related, and overlapping subject matter .. to such an extent that;
 it is confusing for Wikipedia users such as myself
 it begs for a lot of sytematic wikifying, in-text citing, and general raising to higher Wikpeida encyclopedic standards
 it begs for an single all inclusive article bringing them together and giving readers/ users a good overview of the whole field
* Information economy, 
* Information society,
* Information market,
* Knowledge society,
* Knowledge market,
* Knowledge economy
Now, noting there is in fact a single, overarching economic field .. within with all local economies may be compared and contrasted by the extent to which the are (or are not) knowledge-based .. 
.. it is here proposed the existing Knowledge economy article be expanded to cover the full range of knowledge ecomonies around the world .. and all the above articles be merged and intergrated into this single, proposed and expanded discussion.  
I hope such a merge proposal is agreeable .. for the above stated reasons!?!  Bruceanthro (talk) 12:06, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I strongly suggest you aggregate them, individually several are candidate for deletion.  --Snowded TALK 19:15, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge Proposal for Articles on Knowledge Economies

message: I prefer the term "Knowledge Society" to "Information Society". Though I do not know exactly why. It just seems to have a better sense.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.193.227.104 (talk) 08:40, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Knowledge and information are not the same thing, so Knowledge Society and Information Society would not be the same thing either (if the terms had weight); suggest instead consider merging Knowledge society with this article and improving/cleaning up this article. Harvey the rabbit (talk) 03:12, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Knowledge Society 

message: It is not necesary to suggest discussing Google and or EBay separately.  The "web interconnectedness" is a direct byproduct of a knowledge based economy.
It is not clear that "Knowledge Business" is actually an english term.  This sounds like a term used in other languages to refer to a knowledge economy.  The corresponding sentence can/should be deleted.  An english speaker familiar with George Carlin ("you can prick your finger but you can't finger your prick") would not need to be told that "Business Knowledge" and "Knowledge Business" don't mean the same thing.  (Are you "working hard" or "hardly working"?)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.57.245.11 (talk) 01:02, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits 

message: Pity you took of the wiki page knowledge economics. Why? is it because it mentioned other people like Bhekuzulu Khumalo, Debra Amidon. Do not use wikepedia for your racial promotions. The page was knowledge economics, that believes knowledge has been the most important tool since mankind began, and your page knowledge economy that believes knowledge started been used in the 60's, Do not take of other people projects because they are getting more hits than you because they are telling the truth. STop your racism, go back and read whites only but do not corrupt Wikipedia for your demented envious ends.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.226.61.204 (talk) 18:38, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Knowledge Economics 

message: could best be defined as the process of formulating and classifying data relating to individuals and organizations associated with the knowledge economy. The presentation and interpretation of such information is communicated in a style associated with bookkeeping and accountancy; often referred to as 'the balance sheet method'. This accountancy of knowledge creates its own conceptual apparatus and array of bookkeeping terms, most of which must be credited to the works of the 15th century mathematician Luca Pacioli.
85.128.1.2 (talk) 08:43, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Knowledge accountancy 

message: *
* Pacioli Institute for a true and fair view of the knowledge-based economy
85.128.1.2 (talk) 08:34, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: External links

message: I've reversed out several statements that either were not supported by the sources or were synthesis.  This is an article about the knowledge economy, not purely about technology and the World Bank on its own is not enough to hold the article together --Snowded TALK  17:49, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too technocentric 

message: Perhaps you are correct but in my opinion you lack the understanding of the World Bank's needs are to bringing about the Knowledge Economy. Help or get out of the way 72.161.33.155 (talk) 21:48, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rejections 

message: Dr. Khumalo has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:
We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.
Dr. Khumalo has published scholarly research which seems to be relevant to this Wikipedia article:
*Reference 1: Khumalo, Bhekuzulu, 2008. "Knowledge Economics: Improving Theoretical Framework of Knowledge Transfer," MPRA Paper 8942, University Library of Munich, Germany.
*Reference 2: Khumalo, Bhekuzulu, 2007. "Knowledge Theory and Investment: Enhanced Investment Decision Based on the properties of Point X," MPRA Paper 4201, University Library of Munich, Germany.
*Reference 3: Khumalo, Bhekuzulu, 2008. "The Variable Time: crucial to understanding Knowledge Economics," MPRA Paper 9643, University Library of Munich, Germany.
ExpertIdeasBot (talk) 12:36, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dr. Khumalo's comment on this article 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Knowledge economy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141222142438/http://swopec.hhs.se/eijswp/papers/eijswp0156.pdf to http://swopec.hhs.se/eijswp/papers/eijswp0156.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130418004054/http://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/freepublications/en/economics/gii/gii_2012.pdf to http://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/freepublications/en/economics/gii/gii_2012.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:40, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Knowledge construction,  Knowledge creation and Knowledge production all redirect here. However, there is scope for at least one separate (perhaps less economics focused) article on the subject of knowledge creation. Jonpatterns (talk) 18:27, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Good comment! ...how about a disambiguation page on these knowledge concepts?... Cheers ... Risk Engineer (talk) 17:48, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Many redirects (knowledge construction, creation and production) 

message: After adding multiple secondary sources to the first section and reviewing the article, I have removed the insufficient in-text citations template. I do not think the problem is now insufficient in-text citations. I think it is still unclear and basically not up to date with descriptions of the knowledge economy in authoritative secondary sources.Johncdraper (talk) 09:21, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed insufficient in-text citations template