Talk:Pashupatinath Temple

message: The current photo of Pashupatinath is not very good because it does not show the actual temple. 
I found some pictures on flickr that were under the CC license, but none of them were that decent.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tvancort/1943834684/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lavenderstreak/3016191261/
Anyway, I suggest it to be noted on the current pictures caption that it its missing the actual temple. The actuall temple has a golden roof and is of pagoda style.
Prameya (talk) 03:02, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo of Pashupatinath Temple 

message: The Last Paragraph.. Well, It seems to be Vandalised. --Subbu 17:50, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Added Cleanup Tag, I myself could've done it, But I'm currently too busy. --Subbu 17:52, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality? 

message: I propose that Non-Hindu visitors are allowed to have a look at the temple from the other bank of Bagmati river. be changed to  Non-Hindu visitors are allowed to have a look at the temple from the other bank of Bagmati river. However, they are not allowed to enter the temple. What do you think? Kushalt 19:06, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that the sentence needs a bit of modification as well. Actually, none of the visitors are allowed to enter the temple but are only allowed to enter the temple premises. Only priests can enter the temple. The temple of Pashupatinath has a specific schedule. General people can enter the temple premises only in the time allowed for believers of the faith. Even non-Hindus can enter the temple premises, if they have faith in Pashupatinath and follow the rules of temple. Buddhists and Kirats have been visiting the temple since time immemorial. Also, it is noteworthy that one of the main annual festivals of the temple is the conduction of a combined Hindu-Buddhist puja by Buddhist and Hindu priests. Unlike other religious places where time is allocated for service, preaching, tourism etc, the time-table of this temple is allocated for ritual puja by priests and puja by adherents. Puja by adherents include rituals of birth, death and anything in between. The temple is bound by these rules, so, the time alloted for believers can not be used by non-believers. However, for the convenience of non-believers, view of temple from the other bank of river Bagmati (which falls within the area of Pashupatinath premises) has been allocated. Non-believing tourists can take excellent snaps of the temple and its rituals from there. So, I think a more descriptive elaboration of the rule can be added noting that there is definite space for non-believers within the premises of the temple and that anyone with faith, both Hindus and non-Hindus can enter the temple courtyard. Thanks.--Eukesh (talk) 12:34, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal for non-Hindu sentence 

message: "Answerable to the king" implies that there is a king, which there isn't anymore.  Fix?  Triacylglyceride (talk) 16:02, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  King? 

message: (once more, as already writen as first point) In my opinion you can NOT see the temple itself on the photo. It is the temple area;  but the temple just begins outside of the right border of this foto.
Euyasik (talk) 12:51, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo "The Temple" 

message: My goodness, this article is a mess! I noted that this article has been ranked as 'High'importance so i will be notifying the related wikiprojects and some experienced users to collaborate and edit this article.|BINEET| 10:23, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Mess

message: I checked to see if cremation or funeral rites is mentioned in this article. I noticed it isn't. This seems to be an important aspect of activities at the temple. Any objections to my finding appropriate courses and adding this information? HereAndSometimesThere (talk) 16:50, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nothing about funeral rites at this temple