Talk:Tri-State Crematory scandal

message: I think that the title of the last section is a bit misleading: half of it discusses general recommendations about cremations in the US, and, actually... I had already heard about this case before, at the time when the explanation was that the oven was broken, and now that I've heard it was not, I wonder:
Why the heck did this Brent Marsh person not use the crematorium oven and instead disposed of the bodies by other means!? Is there any explanation about it?
Has the case gone to court? David.Monniaux 22:00, 29 Apr 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: JesseG 04:26, 3 Jun 2004 (UTC)

text: Reason refers to doing something on purpose, like motifs for not cremating. Lack on inspections or lack of regulation may allow it to happen, but is not a reason, and not even a cause. Please write tragedy properly.--Patrick 22:01, 1 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: It sounds like a joke, and lots of people are seeing it that way, but that's what's been reported.  Here is the relevant article.  Prometheus-X303- 22:28, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mercury poisoning 

message: Has anyone considered the possibility that Marsh simply did it for the lulz? 76.245.77.119 (talk) 02:29, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, and it was rejected. --mboverload@ 03:00, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Motive 

message: I think it should be mentioned in the artcle that this case was the basis for a law and order ci episode (207.172.55.227 (talk) 01:24, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Law and order CI 

message: There is an unsourced allegation in the Aftermath section that the DA created law in bringing charges. It is unclear why it would be necessary to do so.
If no explanation is forthcoming, it appears the statement is personal belief and ought to be removed from the encyclopedia.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.175.109.15 (talk) 19:55, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  DA created law 

message: The paucity of paragraphs makes the Litigation and Aftermath sections essentially unreadable.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.175.109.15 (talk) 20:05, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of paragraphs 

message: I'm happy to start working on this. Anyone want to help? B Hastings (talk) 15:06, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the links! I cleaned up some of the article. Still need to find citations for some of the specifics in the article and continue to do some more clean up. B Hastings (talk) 16:07, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Desperately needs editing and citations 

message: The whole timeline has been copied from this newspaper online - http://www.timesfreepress.com/news/news/story/2012/feb/12/horror-in-noble/70497/
2601:483:101:9BDD:431:EC97:8008:95D9 (talk) 22:34, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I have followed up on this claim and found that it has been remedied throughout the years. Acebulf (talk) 04:47, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagiarized  

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Tri-State Crematory. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090130061927/http://www.7jad.com:80/Criminal%20Orders.htm to http://www.7jad.com/Criminal%20Orders.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:31, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified