Talk:The Enterprise Incident

message: "the union refused to allow him into their guild for the simple reason that his skills were superior to most of the guild's current members"?!?  What is the source for this information?  This doesn't sound very plausible to me.  Rather, it sound suspiciously like a biased personal account.  Or opinion, at best.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.55.216.24 (talk) 20:29, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That does sound fishy.  I've also heard on the Trekmovie website that the Romulan ship model was destroyed in a fire, which is why the Klingon ships were used in this episode.THD3 (talk) 21:15, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yeah, that sounds like a claim that was made at a bar right after he regaled everyone with a tale about his one-night stand with Angela Joie.  In other words, a total crock.
I did some research on this when cleaning up the section trying to find the truth. I stumbled across three possibilities: Wah destroyed it with a sledgehammer in a fit of rage, it was stepped on by staff when moving it for filming, and that it was destroyed to appease the union. None of them sourced, just statements in articles. I think (with the fire story above) since we have 4 stories we shouldn't post anything until we can find a valid source. StarHOG (Talk) 13:45, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Wah Chang

message: 1) What was it that took Chekov so long to distinguish Spock from the Romulans? He was only half Vulcan!
Addendum: It was a television show. They wanted drama, that's why.
2) Why did the Federation never use the cloaking device afterwards while it obviously was compatible with their own technique?
Addendum: The cloak represents submarines in space. WW2 was still fresh on people's minds. (Roddenberry served in WW2) The Germans used submarines (U Boats) to the fullest, sinking and killing any and everyone. Submarine attacks were considered to be "dirty pool" and quite dishonorable. See next question:
3) The whole thing was a dirty trick and an act of piracy. How could the authors ever justify such a massive violation of interstellar law? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.141.212.149 (talk) 20:03, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Three questions 

message: The Notes section seems to be full of oddities and errors. Could an expert take a look at it? Thanks in advance. Lots42 (talk) 21:44, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notes 

message: So the title of this episode is "The Enterprise Incident" shouldn't it be listed as such, without italics? Just because the ship name, Enterprise is italicized to show it is a ship name in an article, I'm not sure that extends to italicizing it in a title, when the on-screen title doesn't have it italicized. Anybody have a clue about this? StarHOG (Talk) 13:48, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title: ''Enterprise'' or Enterprise? 

message: Not sure if it should go on the article, but there was a ST:TOS chess set heavily advertised in U.S. science-fiction magazines during the early 1990s which had the female Romulan commander as the queen piece on the non-Federation side (see https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Star_Trek_Commemorative_Chess_Set )... AnonMoos (talk) 22:28, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Be bold! Add it...certainly belongs under popular culture, right? StarHOG (Talk) 15:10, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The female Romulan commander chess piece was highlighted in the early 90s magazine ad, but doesn't seem to be highlighted in what turns up in Google search results, and I'm not really seeing reliable sources.  If I had the information in fully Wikipedia-acceptable form, I probably would have already added it to the article... AnonMoos (talk) 02:08, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another reference