lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Juxtapoz

message: This is the major magazine of an important 21st century art movement, it would be criminal to delete this article.
From the passage "Juxtapoz Art & Culture Magazine is a magazine created by painter Robert Williams to celebrate the genius of low brow art. " Art, like many other things, is subjective. To "celebrate the genius" of anything assumes everyone will agree that genius is involved which is just not realistic. I would suggest changing this one word. William (Bill) Bean 13:41, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

message: I'm concerned about the tone of this article. It seems to be a paean, rather than an NPOV article. It's filled with unsourced views of how great or important the magazine is. --Nat Gertler (talk) 03:07, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Tone

message: I added the notability tag to this article because its references are subpar.  Of the three available, one is decent, one is a one sentence mention of Juxtapoz in a bio of the founder, and the last is a link to a blog post. I will delete that blog post ref if there are no objections as it is a non-encyclopedic source. The result is a lot of unsourced statements and questionable notablity. John Milito (talk) 17:39, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the blog reference.  It looks like notability is not the issue, this article simply needs more reliable sources. John Milito (talk) 17:01, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability?
Talk:Old World ROM

message: This doesn't make sense:
:All Power Macs include an emulated 68LC040 core that runs inside a nanokernel; this nanokernel/emulator combination is then used to boot the (predominantly 68k-based) Toolbox, and is also used to support applications written for the 68k. Once Mac OS is running, 68k machines can boot into the Toolbox directly.
Shouldn't that be:
:Once Toolbox is running all machines can boot into MacOS?
Also if it's Toolbox (capital T) it should then not be called "The Toolbox" i.e once MacOS is running we can run the Photoshop? No!
99.153.162.173 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 08:29, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Mixed up?
Talk:Falkland Islands Defence Force

message: Where do they get there AUGs from? Ryan4314 (talk) 19:52, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Steyr AUG 

message: According to the Times' article the FIDF are operating sniper rifles and grenade launchers, does anyone know of what type? I was assuming maybe L96 for the rifle but am not sure about the other and they are known not to follow British convention always.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.225.45.34 (talk) 19:10, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grenade launchers and sniper rifles 
Talk:Mighty Mo (kickboxer)

message: mighty mo had a back injury and cannot fight sergei. jimmy ambriz will replace him. source on sherdog if anyones asking 24.213.49.51 (talk) 19:37, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Whomever keeps changing his latest win to an "head and arm choke" is not correct. It is a generic term to describe that choke. It is supposed to be titled as "arm triangle choke" or rather: "modified arm triangle choke".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bl1tzkrieg1940 (talk • contribs) 03:02, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attention 
Talk:Jatropha oil

message: *Merge - the article could almost just be removed. They're very close. Waitak 18:24, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Merged. Beagel (talk) 17:37, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: Is the extensive criticism of the Burmese government really relevant in context?  I could see it if there was a section dedicated to criticisms of using the plant for fuel, but as it stands the Burma quote is longer than the article itself.   Bagheera (talk) 15:15, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Burma Cyclone

message: The Competition with food crops section has a lot of bold, and often emotional claims, but no references.  Could someone please figure out where these claims came from and cite them?  I'd like to think they are valid and not just anti-biofuel propaganda. Or else should we just delete this dubious section.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.170.125.54 (talk) 21:10, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: They appear valid, but it's hard to find good sources amidst all the bad.  The External links section contains articles that refer to such sources, and a couple of the links may meet WP:RS themselves. --Ronz (talk) 23:22, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Competition with food crops"  needs references 

message: Information on the fatty acid composition is needed. The article on Castor oil lists the production of turkish red oil as one use, then out of a sudden says that Jatropha oil is used for this purpose (which might be the case if their triglycerides contain similar fatty acids).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.227.15.253 (talk) 08:56, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Fatty acid composition"
Talk:Lattice tower

message: Is this pic lattice tower, partially guyed tower or guyed mast? --Jklamo (talk) 19:46, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Pic

message: There are no sources, and the bulk of this article is a list of towers which may or may not be made of lattice steel.  How about some information on construction of these towers, history of their design, engineering aspects, and whatnot?  —Onore Baka Sama(speak | stalk) 05:24, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article is useless 

message: I don't want to say that the article is useless, but it seems somewhat dubious... I arrived from a reference to the Tokyo Sky Tree, which is identified as a lattice tower of 634 meters. That is obviously much taller than the tallest referenced in the article just now... Seems to me that the article needs a lot of work, but I'm not sure where to begin. Mostly I've been a minor glitch editor. Anyway, that tower will open to the public tomorrow, so it will probably result in a lot of secondary traffic to this article. Or maybe not? That reference was on the Wikipedia main page, whereas the Tokyo Sky Tree page does not actually link to this article. Shanen (talk) 07:47, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Tokyo Sky Tree

message: The tables don't sort properly by height.  For example, on the first table, if you sort by height descending, it will tell you that the tallest tower is 62.5m tall.  I would fix this, but I have no idea how.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.42.72.210 (talk) 02:16, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Table sorting 

message: Kiev TV tower can't be the tallest lattice tower in Russia, because Kiev is not in Russia. Эйхер (talk) 15:02, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kiev TV tower
Talk:Tourism in Assam

message: I, alfredboiragi has taken the initiative to improve this section on a priority basis.
I request the editors to send me photos, if any, pertaining to specific tourist locations to my mail id (alfredboiragi at yahoo. com) (without the spaces)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alfredboiragi (talk • contribs) 07:10, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled

message: I'm sure that the biggest railway station in Assam is in Guwahati and not Dibrugarh. If verified I'd revert the changes. Uddhav9 (talk) 05:48, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biggest railway station is in Dibrugarh?
Talk:Xorai

message: Renaming the article to "Sarai"  might be a convenient move keeping in view several Assamese terms e.g. "Saraighat" (শৰাইঘাট), etc. Since for the Assamese Pronunciation,  IPA-as is added, it can be used as a similar term as Saraighat,  which is Etymologically connected to the Sarai/Xorai. Ankur Jyoti Dewri (talk) 16:30, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renaming
Talk:World Cube Association

message: I have proposed that we merge the content from 2006 UK Speedcubing Open. There doesn't seem to be enough content there to warrant a second article. Thoughts? -- MisterHand 17:04, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: favour merge' Just do the merge. It's more than compelling. Cewvero (talk) 17:20, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: This topic has a disproportionately large section on the structure of the WCA, shadowing the general knowledge of the organization! I've tried to alleviate the problem with some contributions with history section reorganization and research. I think there should be some more eyes on this page. Ecco2kstan (talk) 01:33, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Large "Structure" Area 

message: I have fixed and updated the table with the team / committee / council members, and changed its structure a little. It is more compact now and it follows more closely the structure of the WCA page, so it should be easier to keep up to date.
I have also added 3 new committees. Their description is just a short paragraph taken from the WCA website. SebastianoTronto (talk) 10:02, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updated team members table 

message: Currently, the Rubik's UFO is listed under "once official events". However, I tried looking through the cited sources and could not find anything saying it was once an official event. Additionally, it says that the Rubik's UFO "appears in regulation." I also couldn't find anything that said this. Can anyone else find something about this, or should we remove the UFO from the list?
Vetrenarisisum (talk) 17:59, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rubik's UFO
Talk:Erythritol tetranitrate

message: "It is somewhat sensitive to shock and friction, so care should be taken while handling."
The second clause sounds somewhat like a 'hobbyist's' how-to admonition. The substance has little commercial interest, and the clause would better read "...so care would be taken in its handling. JohndanR (talk) 22:08, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Properties, handling
Talk:TRADACOMS

message: Please be kind. This is my first attempt at a Wiki page, and was motivated because there was an empty internal link to TRADACOMS in the EDI article. I am painfully aware that there is a dearth of references in it. This is because the standard is outmoded, although still widely used in the UK, and most information about it is merely as minor references in articles whose main content is different. The information content is fairly solid (I have been working with Tradacoms for many years) but it is difficult to prove much of it. I nevertheless felt it was better than an empty link.
I suspect the longevity of Tradacoms is due to the advent of XML, which effectively stopped EDIFACT as being seen as the way forward, but was not ready for standardised commercial use itself. This led people to stay with, and even adopt, a tried and true standard.
Chrisj1948 17:15, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The durability of the standard is interesting, and one might consider putting something about it in the main article. An additional factor could be that the transactions were well-designed, and still satisfy the data transfer needs of the majority of those in UK Retail. Their lack of development thus becomes a virtue, since it equates to stability. EDIFACT EANCOM subsets (and XML) are more volatile, so unless changes give a business gain this is a disadvantage. It would be interesting to compare with the persistence of usage of the early automotive VDA standard, which has been replaced by an EDIFACT equivalent, but unfortunately I have no information about this. Chrisj1948 09:55, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

text: Volume 1 of the ANA TRADACOMS MANUAL OF STANDARDS FOR ELECTRONIC DATA INTERCHANGE states that the standard originated in 1980, with its first published version in 1982. Page modified accordingly Chrisj1948 13:08, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

text: You are correct. The original link must have been changed. I will try to find a new URL. Chrisj1948 (talk) 08:40, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I have changed the link to one for EDI order specification for House of Fraser. It is not ideal, and I will try to find a better example, but at least the link works Chrisj1948 (talk) 19:15, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
Talk:The Lost Boys (Stargate Atlantis)/To do

message: The "Notes" section says:
::While Sheppard is flying the dart in automatic pilot he says, "R2, I need to deactivate the auto pilot." This is a clear reference to The Phantom Menace, in which Anakin Skywalker makes a similar request.
The last sentence could use more specifics.
Though perhaps not an exhaustive list, a similar request by Anakin is not quoted from "The Phantom Menace" here:
http://starwarsdotcom.com/star_wars/quotes/anakin.html
The closest thing that I have found so far is from "Revenge Of The Sith":
http://www.geocities.com/jedi_vega/ep3_script.htm
::ANAKIN: Artoo, go back. I need you to stay with the ship.
Or pehaps an opposite request by Luke here:
http://members.fortunecity.com/meshermin/ties_that_bind30.htm
::"R2 I need you to connect to the nav-computer ..."
Ac44ck 17:28, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Allusion to Star Wars
Talk:Paedocypris

message: http://budak.blogs.com/the_annotated_budak/2006/01/going_going_gon.html
Sorry, but what have this article to do with Paedocypris progenetica. This species occurs in Sumatra, not in West Malaysia. --Melly42 23:52, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Source that claimed extinction?
Talk:Equinox (Star Trek: Voyager)

message: I found this episode to be particularly engaging. Here we have Captain Janeway, a woman who prides herself on sticking to the Prime Directive, who must stand face to face with a fellow Captain who has thrown the rulebook out the nearest airlock. However, and I am deeply interested how other may see this, I think I had to side with Capt. Ransom. The Nova- class starship was not nearly as equipped for such a trip as Voyager was. They did not have a former Borg drone and her corresponding Borg technology. They did not have a properly functioning Emergency Medical Hologram. Their warp drive system was not the same top- of - the - line powerplant Voyager had. Sonic showers and replicators were long since off- line. Most of the crew was dead. I think this episode showcases what every normal human would do in a hopeless situation: Survive at all costs.
Captain Ransom was right. One may preach about ethics and the Prime Directive when your crew is not starving. Captain Janeway, always willing to do the right thing, was wrong to a degree. The need to kill to survive is not a new concept. Overall, I think Ransom was only trying to do what Janeway ultimately did: Just get his crew home safely. By the way, just how did Janeway get home? Oh, yes, she did it by practically wiping out an entire race. Sure, the Borg was the most formidable threat of our galaxy, but whether it is alien being from another dimension or a race of bionics, it all boils down to the instinct of survival.Jason Keyes 17:32, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Response to the Borg part: Janeway did not kill all the Borg. The Shatnerverse books are non-canon, as all the other books are, but books can explore an idea further than a 48 minute tv show. The Borg homeworld is a planet-cyborg. Borg queens are rogue elements of Borg "branches" or rogue factions that have become separate from the Borgworld. Janeway destroyed one branch of the Borg, the branch that specifically threatened Humanity and the Federation. Why? Because the series had to end, and the writers were out of ideas. If the episode had been thoughtfully written, Janeway would have struck a deal of some kind with the Borg, and exchanged technology, history, maybe even had tea with the Borg Queen and set up an embassy. What does this have to do with the topic? Just illustrating the difference between a well written episode, Equinox, and a poorly written one, End Game.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.179.30.13 (talk) 22:34, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Starfleet Ethics in the Delta Quadrant

message: Should be mention this two-parter was turned into a novel. Lots42 (talk) 10:09, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Novel 

message: The Hollywood Reporter reviewed the episode at the time,  September 22, 2009. With the knowledge that it exists maybe someone has access to archives that include Hollywood Reporter back issues and could add references to that contemporary review? -- 109.79.168.87 (talk) 03:06, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hollywood Reporter
Talk:White Magic (Alice A. Bailey)

message: There is some sourcing in this article, but it has to do with the Theosophical Movement rather than the Alice Bailey movement. Since this article is about Bailey's views on White Magic, as described in her book, it is a little difficult to understand why the Theosophical mention is even in this article. Kwork 17:35, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources
Talk:Golden Globe Award for Best Director

message: Hello to anyone watching this page. This article needs serious work if its FLC status is to be kept. If someone is interested in improving the article, please contact me at my talk page and I will post issues here. Dabomb87 (talk) 23:30, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs work 
Talk:Contact (law)

message: the visitation/custody distinction does not hold for all states in the u.s.  in co, for instance, 'parenting time' and 'parental rights and responsibilities' are the operative terms.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.253.5.159 (talk) 06:43, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Fort Cusseta

message: Is there any evidence for the claims in this article? The pictured building does not appear to date back nearly as far as is claimed. 
Of the two links provided, one was dead (and has been removed) and the other is only a list of fort names from a defunct Geocities site. If "Fort Cusseta" ever existed, there should be some documentary evidence. What has been given here is not convincing. — ℜob C. alias ÀLAROB 17:19, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evidence? 

message: https://www.facebook.com/368880530242703/posts/860604424403642/ Christianmusician06 (talk) 21:53, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  It has been demolished. Picture included.
Talk:Metopium toxiferum

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:18, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Castle Cornet

message: Hi, I understand Castle Cornet had an interesting history during this period.  It was Royalist while the rest of Guernsey was with Parliament.  The castle garrison bombarded St Peter Port, were in turn besieged, and eventually had to surrender after holding out for many months.  I'm sure there was also an episode where some jurats being held prisoner in the castle escaped to Guernsey across the rocks, while under fire from the castle garrison. Anyway, if someone has a more coherent picture than me I think it would be nice to add these details to the main article.  Cheers.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.174.8.253 (talk) 12:31, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Article expanded. There is probably enough information for a whole page on the civil war era, but not from me today. Martin a Donkey 23:31, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Castle Cornet during the English Civil War

message: I think the group that occupied guernsey can probably be called more than a 'small group'. I'm led to believe the force consisted of batallion-strength numbers, 10,000 or more.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.240.128.75 (talk) 15:15, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It is supposed to mean the garrison of the castle, not the garrison of Guernsey itself. Martin a Donkey 23:31, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: 'Small group' of German Soldiers?
Talk:Mark S. Miller

message: I have known Mark Miller since about 1986.  If you google on his name and Alcor, there are a number of reports where he was associated, but I can't find a published report to reference.  Anyway, he has been signed up almost as long as I have and wants to be in this category per email this date.  
Perhaps I should ask Alcor to put members who don't mind being public on their web site.Keith Henson (talk) 03:01, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category:Cryonicists
Talk:Kelly Williams

message: Who does Kelly Williams play for?  The first line says Barangay Ginebra Kings, but at the bottom it mentions coach Boyet Fernandez who coaches for the Sta. Lucia Realtors.  --Bejnar (talk) 14:40, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: What team?

message: A better image is needed, especially if the article is to become a Good Article Ethanbas (talk) 04:59, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better image needed
Talk:Afterfeast

message: The exact interwiki in Russian for Afterfeast could be :ru:Попразднство. By now there's no a separate article for this subject, so Russian Wikipedia temporarily redirects :ru:Попразднство to one chapter in another article, :ru:Великие праздники.
At the same time, I deleted the interwiki from this page to a Rumanian article :ro:Odovaine after re-linking the latter to a proper article in Russian section, that is :ru:Отдание (Otdaniye). Exact equivalent in English for Otdanie/Odovanie is Leavetaking (now redirected to this article, Afterfeast).
Cherurbino (talk) 05:23, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  interwiki 
Talk:Belarusian Helsinki Committee

message: The sentence "The organization was harassed by the government" violates the neutrality policy. Per the policy, articles should "[a]ssert facts, including facts about opinions—but ... not assert the opinions themselves" (see WP:NPOV#A simple formulation). Since "harassed" is a subjective term, the sentence must be attributed to someone in order to be retained (e.g., "According to X, the organization was harassed by the government"). As this page is apparently watched, I will only tag it for now. -- Black Falcon (Talk) 17:55, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of "harassed"
Talk:Danionella

message: RSJP-B is currently off-line, but the discovery is reported by the BBC. kwami (talk) 08:36, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  D. dracula 
Talk:Sam Stout

message: "Clementi had a strong first round but Sam outstruck him in the second and third rounds."
- not according to 2 of the 3 judges --David.snipes (talk) 12:28, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 

message: Does anyone think that the fact that Shawn Tompkins is Sam's brother-in-law should be included on this page?It adds nothing really but it's sort of interesting.Just wondering.(MgTurtle (talk) 19:45, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brother-in-law 