lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:Template index/Redirect pages

message: The support for redirect templates seems to be broken in MediaWiki 1.4. It seems to work in previews and diffs  but not on the actual redirect pages  and the categories are empty, containing only the templates themselves, not the redirect pages using them (e.g. follow the :Category:Redirects from plurals link in the diff). I noticed that there are no template messages and category links on the redirect pages when I first saw the new layout with large type and redirect.png just after upgrading to MediaWiki 1.4, which looked like a minor display issue, but now I see that the categories are empty, making the entire :Category:Redirects hierarchy useless. I assume that was not intentional. Can the old redirect page layout be used until the problem is solved? Rafał Pocztarski 18:16, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Note that "Whatlinkshere/Template:R from whatever" pages do work still. -- Paddu 03:04, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Broken?

message: Would anyone object if the examples were made color-blind friendly by prefixing them with "YES: <example>" and "NO: <example>"? I'm not even color blind and I still need to squint to distinguish between the green and very dark red used here. Ljleppan (talk) 09:49, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree on some sort of accessibility improvement, though I'd slightly prefer usage of  and . Skarmory (talk • contribs) 03:29, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Example colors 

message: There's something weird going on between Wikipedia:Template index/Redirect pages and /. The former gives ß as a ligature that should be under  when it's used to substitute for SS, while it gives  when a B is used to substitute for it, but the ligature template pages make no such distinction and seem to imply that they should be used any time an ß is involved. I'm left confused as to what redirects including the ß should cover – the template index seems to imply that the ligature template is for characters that look similar, which I don't think is accurate, but I don't know for certain. I would think some more clarification is needed, or an updating of the examples in some fashion; I'd do it myself, but I don't know what these templates' intended (and actual) use-cases are. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 03:41, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ligatures
Talk:Riemann–Liouville integral

message: The page Differintegral exists and mirrors this page. As this page is more correctly titled the content of that page should be merged into this page. The two pages are both fairly complete, but are redundant and should be unified. A redirect at "Differintegral" to "Riemann-Liouville differintegral" would be appropriate on that page. --Matthew 19:02, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge "Differintegral" into this page and RD 

message: According to the article on fractional calculus, Niels Henrik Abel was the first to define this integral with noninteger parametr, in 1823, and used it to solve his Abel Integral Equations in 1826. This is in contradiction with what this article states, viz. that Liouville was the first to consider this integral 92.221.229.69 (talk) 16:18, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  On the origin
Talk:Bt

message: In spirit of being Bold, changed the redirect for Bt from Bacillus thuringiensis to BT Group plc, which is one of the biggest companies in the UK. Guessing that this might be a more useful redirect? Hielant
:Why? Article names are case-sensitive, so Bt is different from BT. Also most people aren't going to be able to spell 'thuringiensis' when looking up the pesticide, so the redirect is highly useful... ima changing back. Graft 18:55, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Template talk:Edit summary

message: Always use the substitute option with this template: . If you do not do this users will inadvertantly edit the template when they attempt to edit the section on the talk page. Hyacinth 03:04, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: NOTICE

message: This template is for use in reminding users to follow policy and provide edit summaries. Hyacinth 18:51, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Purpose

message: Dear contributor, first I would like to say a big thank you for your time, care, and enthusiasm in editing Wikipedia articles. I hope you find it just as much fun as I do. 
I am writing with a small suggestion. I wonder if you could write an edit summary every time you make changes to an article (or when you start a new one). Even a short summary helps. To see how often you have done so in the past, you may go to http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&target=YOUR USERNAME.
Edit summaries are important for a number of reasons. Every time you change an article, a record of that change propagates to every single person who has that article on their watchlist. Most people have an article on their watchlist because they care a lot about it, so they would like to be informed about what is going on with it. Accurate summaries help people decide whether it is worthwhile for them to check a change. This is why your edit summary, which will take you maybe 15 seconds, is a time-saver and a great act of candor to the other people interested in the same article as you. Accurate edit summaries are important because they create trust regarding your contributions and help resolve disputes.
There are other, very convincing reasons for putting an edit summary. More information is available at Wikipedia:Edit summary. If at any point you have any questions about this rule (or anything else for that matter), please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you and happy editing!
Oleg Alexandrov 03:10, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Great. Hyacinth 00:02, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)

text: Not sure that'd help. I'm here b/c I just got bitten by a great Wikipedian who happens not to believe in edit summaries. I think there is a measure of ideological resistance that won't be assuaged by any nice wording. I'm trying to think if there is any other solution besides a template. Xiner (talk, email) 21:33, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit summary

message: "Edit summary - remove ridiculous boilerplate. 3 words from your mouth would more efficient than 10 ko worth of laughable politness."
My version was much shorter. Hyacinth 02:07, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: See Template:Editsummarynew. Hyacinth 06:35, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Length

message: I've undone the insertion of a line break until it can be explained how inserting it is a fix of the formatting. --Geniac 11:43, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Line break
Talk:Momo

message: I just did a major cleanup on this dab page, to bring it into better alignment with the Manual of Style.  It was getting pretty hairy, with some unbalanced section sizes.  I'm hoping this new organization will help readers find things more easily.  Some notes: · "Anime, manga, animation, and Japanese folklore" is rather verbose for a section title, but as a grouping, I think it makes sense.  Anime/manga/Japanese are obviously heavily interrelated.  "Airbender" is US in origin, but borrows heavily from Asian influences, and the section is already animation heavy, so it seemed a good fit. · I tried to introduce the actual Japanese writing symbols (not sure what they're properly called) by copy-and-paste from articles.  Hopefully I did it right.  In particular, I'm not at all sure about the symbol for "peach".  Attention from experts encouraged!  —DragonHawk (talk|hist) 22:25, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup Oct 2008 

message: Anything or any person of Tibet is said to be Tibetan. The word tibetian is not correct and someone keeps messing with the spelling. Also momo is foremost a Tibetan dumpling and then Nepalese due to the presence of Nepalese ethnic groups of Tibetan ancestry.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.97.133.81 (talk) 17:06, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the spelling correction, but please do not remove "Nepalese" - "foremost Tibetan" does not mean "not Nepalese". Eldar (talk) 21:15, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  It's Tibetan...not tibetian 

message: Please add to the Momo (food) line that it is "a vegetable or cheese filled dumpling" , popular in .... 67.220.13.25 (talk) 14:34, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Partly done: I've added "a dumpling". According to the Momo (food) article, it could contain meat, vegetables, cheese, or khoa, so I think just "a dumpling" probably works the best. NiciVampireHeart 00:04, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 10 March 2019 

message: Momo is no way indian dish and is mentioned as indian dish on wikipedia. Originated in China, spread to Tibet and flavours changed and improved by Nepalese and someone locked the wikipedia page mentioning it as indian dish is rubbish. Keeson99 (talk) 16:29, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Momo (food) 
Talk:Federal Republic of Central America

message: An anonymous user has edited the article to claim that the accurate title of the state is actually the "United Provinces of Central America". If this is true the article should be moved.
Iota 19:13, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Federal republic or United Provinces?

message: *The name United States is incorrect in both English and Spanish. The correct term is United Provinces of Central America. This also reflects accepted usage in other reference sources. EdwinHJ | Talk  17:11, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was move. -- tariqabjotu (joturner) 03:53, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: :Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
* Support as nominee. -  AjaxSmack  01:08, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: The map used should be edited to not include Belize, which was never part of the country. Nwebster84 (talk) 18:59, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually Belize was part of Guatemala. Thinker78 (talk) 01:05, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: While "the territory of Belize has been claimed [by FRCA/Guatemala] in whole or in part since 1821" (emphasis added), it was under British control during that entire period until independence in 1981. "By the time Spain lost control of Mexico and Central America in 1821, Britain had extended its control over the area, albeit informally and unsystematically." See Belizean–Guatemalan_territorial_dispute. Nwebster84 (talk) 22:08, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Map
Talk:Dysfunctional family

message: Don't see any citation for this, and isn't co-dependency quite the opposite problem than dysfunctional families? 173.180.202.22 (talk) 21:29, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: This uncited assertion, that received no contextual development within the text, has now, more than 2 years later, been removed. Whether it's right or wrong, it is contrary to verifiability principles. FeatherPluma (talk) 02:47, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  co-dependency causes it? 

message: This article does not read like an encyclopedia article. It needs a major rewrite to make it useful to the general-interest reader. A collection of lists does not an article make, and the whole thing appears to have been lifted verbatim from a self-help book.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.20.8.226 (talk) 06:51, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about "encyclopedia style"? 

message: Someone with real qualifications in psychology should completely rewrite this, or maybe the entire thing should be scrapped altogether. This isn't an adequate explanation of what truly defines a "dysfunctional family", imo. It seems like whoever wrote this had a lot of bias from their own family issues.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.78.192.41 (talk) 06:22, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is "dysfunctional" 

message: the laundry list and the other laundry list 166.223.52.239 (talk) 05:05, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification.... there are two laundry lists... 

message: — Assignment last updated by Gishubtr (talk) 22:01, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Psychology of the Family
Talk:2004 Indian Ocean earthquake and tsunami/Archive 2

message: Drudge is reporting that the ENTIRE ISLAND of Sumatra has moved 100 feet to the southwest.  www.drudgereport.com , can this be true.  I can't find supporting documentation anywhere.  Has anybody else found the documentation for this.  if it's true that's an entire island a little larger than California moving 1/3 of a US football field, WOW!!!
:Sounds like BS.
:The US National Earthquake Information Center is cited by the NYT as saying that hundreds of miles of seabed shot 50 feet upward. This is the sort of motion that causes tsunami. This is also consistent with the subduction faults off Sumatra's west coast. -- Cyrius|✎ 06:36, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: The shift was 15m (50ft).  .  It would have been mostly vertical as the Indian Plate shifted down under the Burma Plate.  600 miles of fault line jumps 500ft, and all the water over hit starts flowing downhill... BanyanTree 10:39, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)

text: Yeah, I added info on movement to the "Quake characteristics" section last night but am leery of it.  The numbers are based on a computer model of possible movement and I don't think anyone has actually taken a tape measure out to see yet.  Since Sumatra is on two different plates I would be surprised if they had identical movement (though I'm not a geologist by any means).  So there's also the issue of relative movement: was it 30m southwest versus a point on the India plate, which was going under the Burma Plate, so there's no relative movement between, for example, Jakarta and Banda Aceh? Or did the Burma plate move 30m southwest versus all the other plates in the world?   BanyanTree 17:35, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sumatra moved 100 feet? 

message: I've seen the first people talk about >100,000 dead.. , unfortunately it's German-only. Interestingly, news.yahoo.de seems much more up-to-date that news.yahoo.com. -- Nils 17:55, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Unreal
Talk:Juno Reactor

message: Why is there nothing about the members and the history of the members?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.151.119.250 (talk) 03:22, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Because you haven't written it yet? --Gene_poole (talk) 05:52, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: History...?

message: The biography here is lifted word-for-word from the Reactor Leak website, specifically here. Sockatume, Talk 19:39, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, if nobody wants to justify its inclusion, I'm removing it. Sockatume, Talk 17:09, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Probable copyvio

message: Can anyone specify this?  I'm a great fan of both the movie and Juno Reactor, and i have not yet found any music in either of the trailers, that does not come directly from the R+J soundtrack. Juno Reactor isn't listed anywhere on either of the 2 officially released soundtracks, so unless someone can give a reference on it, it should be removed from the article. 
Zebeyo 22:42, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Since no one has added a reference for this in the intervening three years, I've deleted the mention. // ⌘macwhiz (talk) 03:23, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Romeo + Juliet trailer reference ? 

message: The link in this article for Paul Jackson goes to the wrong Paul Jackson, Bass Player. I'm compiling a bio about the right Paul Jackson.
(Treb0r (talk) 10:39, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The WRONG Paul Jackson 

message: "This release is considered to be one of the first albums in the goa trance genre."
Its true, only because anyone who is into trance, knows it like they know how to breathe...but how about a source?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.174.157.126 (talk) 23:03, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Definitely needs a citation; if one doesn't show up soon, it should be deleted. // ⌘macwhiz (talk) 03:23, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced qualitative judgment 

message: This article cited three YouTube videos as sources for statements that the band's music was used in movie trailers.  This is original research, and not permissible on Wikipedia.  A reliable secondary or tertiary source must be found stating that these trailers use the band's music.  I have removed the inappropriate citations. // ⌘macwhiz (talk) 03:23, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube as a source 
Talk:Lee Iacocca

message: If someone can undue the last edit and simply remove the bad links, thank you. 2600:1700:9511:7800:2057:6850:4FEB:D51F (talk) 22:32, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  I accidentally broke this page  

message: Hello,
It says that his autobiography was published in 1984 and further down it says 86.
Regards,
Augustin 2A01:E0A:8DB:BDD0:204B:E93A:74B2:5AA5 (talk) 23:39, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  wrong date  

message: When he became the CEO 41.180.62.30 (talk) 15:21, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lee Iacocca
Talk:2004 Indian Ocean earthquake and tsunami/Multimedia

message: I have removed the image gallery from my website and uploaded the photos to the commons at commons:2004 Indian Ocean earthquake, all under GFDL. Please use any of those images if you prefer. Matthewmayer 13:10, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Images

message: *  seems warped on the page (using Konqueror) but not on this link or the image page. Anybody else noticed anything? - Skysmith 10:19, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Warped image
Talk:Brett Favre

message: In 2018 Farve was tricked into recording an anti Semitic video on the app Cameo. Should this be put under controversies? It seems to have gotten a lot of press from reliable sources.   Foward123456 (talk) 15:21, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Why? What does it say about Favre? Anyone on Cameo could have been duped into reading that language. Did this get any lasting coverage beyond Dec 2018? – Muboshgu (talk) 16:09, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It did not receive any lasting coverage, but it seemed to be considered major news from reliable sources, USA Today, NYT, Washington post, sports illustrated. Despite it clearly being an accident, it seems notable. Just wanted to get some feedback on if this should be added to his wiki page. Your thoughts? Foward123456 (talk) 19:31, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: This should not be included on his page. That it was covered by multiple sources is not relevant. It was a one-day-and-done story, and does not contribute to our understanding of who Favre is. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:40, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anti-Semitic Cameo 

message: Add to NFL Records in header - Most Career Interceptions Thrown, 336 2600:6C44:6F00:14F:E9C0:8AE7:63C6:39E1 (talk) 17:43, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Shadow311 (talk) 17:46, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 12 December 2023
Talk:2005 Palestinian presidential election

message: I added some of observors from United States.Ofcourse there were lots of observors but I just mentioned President Carter and Senator Biden and Senator Sununu.--Sina 22:47, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: 2009 Ramallite (talk) 17:18, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Observors
Talk:Leslie White

message: This is written as if it will forever remain the copied-from-another-source information.  That isn't the correct way to do it, is it?  Gene Nygaard 20:59, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikified and expanded a little. Still needs a rewrite, but at least first impression should be slightly better. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 19:38, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: (Form?)

message: Why is it P=E*T not C=E*T?  See  which has E × T = C.  C stands for "culture": what is P?  -- JimR 10:16, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I am not sure, but  seems to confirm your point, so I'll adjust it accordingly.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 15:17, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: White's Law: P or C?

message: Inline citations are desparately needed for this article.  ludahai 魯大海 10:06, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations

message: What heck is a "peripatetic civil engineer"? White's father was an PERIPATETIC...whatthe???  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.7.63.84 (talk) 11:23, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peripatetic 
Talk:Port forwarding

message: IF someone has some information on how to do this for macintosh users, I think it would be very helpful to add, either here or in another entry. thank you.
I have some information here is a program that does it for the mac http://www.codingmonkeys.de/portmap/
-alec  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.254.104.237 (talk) 19:41, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Information for Macintosh Users? 

message: I'm under the impression that UDP relay and port relay are synonyms for port forwarding. These terms do not come up in a Wikipedia search but they do come up in an internet search. I'd be happy to create some redirects if this is so. --Kvng (talk) 00:42, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  UDP relay 
Talk:Language identification in the limit

message: Hi contributors,
This surely looks like an important and informative article. But francly, i don't understand a word of it. It would be sooo nice if it had anintroductory paragraph that tells a stupid lay what all of this is about. ( i don't expect to understand the rest anyway LOL) best regards, Lady Tenar 22:03, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Scottish Enterprise Party

message: One important difference between the SEP [Scottish Enterprise Party] and the SNP [Scottish Nationalist Party] is that the SEP view the resumption of sovereignty from London as proposed by the SNP only then to pass it over to the European Union in Bruxxels is not only risable but a complete travesty and entirely at odds with the interests of the Scottish nation's cultural and economic independence. Further more the SEP is a Centre-Right party not a Rightwing party per se.
Iain Brodie of Falsyde. Co-ordinator. Scottish Enterprise Party.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 148.176.235.99 (talk • contribs) 22:21, 30 December 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Comparison to SNP