Talk:Noise reduction

message: A great way to remove noise without signal loss is to take several identical images and adding/averaging them. This is used a lot in astrophotography, where the ultra-long exposures necessary to capture faint nebulae, etc. still shows a lot of random noise. Since the noise is "white", its average over many exposures tends to zero, so SNR is increased dramatically.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.196.183.78 (talk) 23:49, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Image Stacking

message: What about industrial noise reduction? -- 142.85.5.141 16:14, 4 June 2007
: What about it? Is it audio? --Adoniscik (talk) 22:18, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Industrial Noise Reduction

message: The article Dynamic_Noise_Reduction was nominated for deletion with the conclusion to merge it into the In_audio section of this article.  That merge has apparently been done, and now the final disposition of the Dynamic_Noise_Reduction article needs attention by someone with the powers to address it.  I just posted more about this on the talk page of that article, and I won't repeat it here.  Please see that talk page: []
71.242.26.9 (talk) 13:09, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I finished it up be redirecting to the section in this merged article. Dicklyon (talk) 20:54, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge of Dynamic_Noise_Reduction into this article 

message: Hi,
Please give some ideas to reduce the sound of AHU in open ceiling.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.97.57.13 (talk) 10:05, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  How to reduce the sound of AHU 

message: I've recorded a sound file that I think is a great example of noise removal from an audio signal.  Any tips to add it?
24.5.216.172 (talk) 00:33, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add a Sample 

message: Are there any studies about noise reduction by the human brain? It would be interesting to incorporate into the article. --Scandum (talk) 19:39, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Human Brain 

message: A description like "caused by random electrons that, heavily influenced by heat, stray from their designated path" is unscientific and even ignorant, because electrons have no "designated path", and have no paths in the common sense. Moreover, as electrons are indistinguishable particles, any individual electron has no its own "path" at all. Apparently, the so named "hiss" is either thermal noise or shot noise, or maybe both. I am convinced that a link to one of these, or both, must be placed instead of the current crap. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 06:48, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The hiss 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Noise reduction. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20081105073059/http://freespace.virgin.net:80/ljmayes.mal/comp/philips.htm to http://freespace.virgin.net/ljmayes.mal/comp/philips.htm
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070927190856/http://www.national.com/company/pressroom/history80.html to http://www.national.com/company/pressroom/history80.html
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20081220145857/http://triadspeakers.com:80/education_avterms.html to http://www.triadspeakers.com/education_avterms.html
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20081220022234/http://www.national.com:80/pf/LM/LM1894.html to http://www.national.com/pf/LM/LM1894.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:40, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified