Talk:Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist Centre)

message: I receive frequent posting from a left wing discussion group (trainspotters) refering to the "Maobadi" although I am somewhat unclear of what it refers to.  I is clear from context that it pertains to 1) Nepal 2)Maoist politics. Does the term "Maobadi" refer to CPN-M?  If so I would create a redirect page to this article. Currently a wp search for "Mobadi" in article namespace returns nothing.  Edivorce 20:47, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Maobadi

message: Hi,
the text under Leadership, Command Structure is almost verbatim copied from
http://www.satp.org/satporgtp/countries/nepal/terroristoutfits/index.html
but no reference to this source has been made.
Can someone please check if this is o.k. and if other text from the same site has been copied?
Wei Xiwu 11:56, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Material copied from other side without proper referencing / copyright infringement? 

message: I added a statement to this section making note of the relatively antiquated nature of some of the weaponry carried by the Communist insurgents. I added a link to a photo gallery showing the insurgents carrying what appear possibly to be muskets. --KobaVanDerLubbe (talk) 00:06, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry but I removed that here as it appears to be a classic case of OR. You need a reference if you want to make a note of their antiquated weaponary. You cannot add something based on your intepretation of a photo. While the whole article is in dire need of referencing it doesn't mean we should just add more OR. Nil Einne (talk) 08:20, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Weaponry

message: large parts of this article still refers to the party as if the war was still going on. Details on armed forces needs to be shifted to a separate People's Liberation Army (Nepal) article. --Soman (talk) 08:39, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  massive update needed 

message: This Article is problematic. It seems as if a few writers urge the visitor to pick up a specific point of view regarding this. I would suggest to simply remove anything without sources, and rewrite the whole stuff that is without any facts. And more links to a critical, thinking journalism would not be bad here. 80.108.103.172 (talk) 18:54, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality of the article 

message: i found this is missing in the artice
could someone add this? a posible starting point to get info on this could be 
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7348049.stm
quote: A message of "land to the tiller", already tried out in some remote places, has huge appeal in a country of subsistence farmers and labourers.
So too do the promise of deliverance from caste or gender discrimination, or the financially crippling dowry system - changes the Maoists really have set about introducing. 
In business, Maoist trade union mobilisation has in some cases doubled people's pitiful wages.
Their promise not to hamper private enterprise means some entrepreneurs are swinging behind them.
In their own leadership and parliamentary appointees the Maoists have introduced more women and more people from disadvantaged castes and ethnic groups, something they promise to continue. 
Ideologically, the Maoists remain textbook communists and will certainly not ditch their title, professing admiration for Mao. But Maoist-watchers say that in government they will be pragmatic, not rigid.
-- endquote
--Stefanbcn (talk) 13:30, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  program or aims of the party

message: Can you believe a communist would lie
http://www.nepalnews.com/archive/2009/may/may05/news12.php#1  —Preceding unsigned comment added by N8Riley (talk • contribs) 14:33, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Video shows Dahal admitting real strength of PLA not more than 8,000

message: Just what is the difference between this Unified Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) and Communist Party of Nepal (Unified Marxist–Leninist)? Why can't they agree to cooperate, since they both believe in Communism? Why can't they create a unified government? These things are still not clear to me. Selerian (talk) 14:05, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Different from [[Communist Party of Nepal (Unified Marxist–Leninist)]]

message: The election symbol of the new party CPN-M (with SN 6) is now the hammer and sickle on a circle. The election symbol of Communist Party of Nepal (Unified-Marxist- Leninist), SN 1, is the Sun. (Election Commission of Nepal) Wakari07 (talk) 20:39, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Election symbol 2012

message: Substituted at 09:33, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment

message: This article seems years out-of-date.  What are their objectives now?  What are recent happenings with the party now?  63.235.172.153 (talk) 05:51, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outdated 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist-Centre). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060209105542/http://schema-root.org/region/asia/south_asia/nepal/maoists/ to http://schema-root.org/region/asia/south_asia/nepal/maoists/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:25, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist Centre). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nepalnews.com.np/contents/englishdaily/ktmpost/2002/sep/sep10/index.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081122021005/http://www.nepalnews.com/archive/2008/apr/apr10/news04.php to http://www.nepalnews.com/archive/2008/apr/apr10/news04.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:04, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I propose merging Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist Centre) and Unified Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist). UCPN (Maoist) has the same content as part of this page. UCPN (Maoist) was seen as a continuation of the CPN (Maoist) and not as a separate party. Also there's a weird gap for no reason, CPN (Maoist) and CPN (Maoist Centre) share the same page but UCPN (Maoist) does not. The page either needs to be split into three separate pages, Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist), Unified Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) and Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist Centre) or we need to have a single page for the Maoist party.  PenGear (talk) 07:09, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: Formal request has been received from Franked2004 either to merge Nepalese Civil War into Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist Centre) or to move the material on the Nepalese Civil War from the latter to the former page. Please discuss the proposal below.
Rationale as given by proposer: I don't see the use of article Nepalese Civil War in case the mother party has all related data in its history portion. Either the article on the mother party needs to be split or both articles need to be merged. Felix QW (talk) 17:56, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose. The material on the civil war in the Maoist Centre page contains mostly content related to Maoist activities during the period and there is no proper rationale to merge a significant event like the civil war into another page. PenGear (talk) 13:15, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

text: Oppose, one concerns a political party that is still a significant part of government today, and the other concerns the civil war that ended monarchy. It does not necessarily follow that these articles should be combined just because this party was responsible for starting this war.Krishna Dahal (talk) 22:49, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

text: Oppose, Though related, both cover completely different topics. One article is about the political party and another a civil war caused by the party. Merging such significant portion of Nepalese history to political party's page will be great problem. It would also heavily undermine RNA and Government's involvement in the civil war. PN27 (talk) 15:01, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

text: Oppose, unhelpful. Arguably there will be some overlap, but focus needs to be different, one article on the party (with coverage on its history, organization, positions) and one on the period of Nepalese history. --Soman (talk) 12:13, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nepalese Civil War