Talk:Rose and Bernard Nadler

message: Rose appears in the following episodes:
Season 1
* Pilot: Part 1
* Pilot: Part 2
* Walkabout
* Whatever the Case May Be
Season 2
* Everybody Hates Hugo
* Abandoned
* Collision
* What Kate Did
* The Whole Truth
* S.O.S.
Season 3
*Greatest Hits
*Through the Looking Glass
someone deleted it so i moved it onto here. (I didnt put it on - someone else made it)
- Russell29 (talk • contribs) 19:46, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Appearances

message: When we say that she is 60 years old, are we keeping in mind her birthday in The Whole Truth?  --154.20.217.225 04:19, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Age

message: On Bernard's page the healer is named Issac and here it's Isaac. I can't remember which one is correct but if someone knows, the wrongly written name should be corrected...
I'm not sure what the correct spelling is, but I know it's pronounced "Eye-zik", not "Eye-zay-ik"...  Would that Issac?
It's Isaac, according to Lostpedia. Everyoneandeveryone (talk) 23:02, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Healer 

message: :Image:Rose Lost.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 12:36, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Rose Lost.jpg

message: I think she is one of the most notable characters on the show especially since she and eher husband Bernard Nadler actually had their own flashback episode (S.O.S. (Lost)) with her doing most of the flashbacks. Anyway, I guess its better to merge both articles and turn them into main characters. 23prootie (talk) 08:08, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability problem

message: The image :Image:Nadler.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here.  In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.  Please check
:* That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
:* That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --00:57, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image copyright problem with Image:Nadler.jpg

message: I think Rose Henderson and Bernard's articles should be merged into a single article. Although they are separate during season one and early season, the rest of their arcs are pretty similar and involve each other. Their notability really comes from them being a couple rather than the individual characters. I can't find any information about L. Scott Caldwell or Sam Anderson's casting, so much of their character development overlaps. Critics tend to mention them together other than the odd piece of reception here and there. I've done a mock-up of roughly what it could look like. Sanders11 (talk) 16:12, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with the merge. It looks very good.Tintor2 (talk) 17:35, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Support; I like the idea (like Nikki and Paulo) It does seem more notable to have two characters in one if the outside reseources keep referring to both of them in the same way. Sanders11's mock-up certainly looks good also. -- Matthew R Dunn (talk) 11:37, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

text: Support; the mock up looks great. Liquidluck (talk) 00:58, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal