lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Charles Henry Fletcher

message: Born 1859 (?). (where?) Married? To whom? Children? Where did they live? Did he do anything besides run the company?
Seems like this was taken from a) a company bio, and b) an obit or two, though you'd think there'd be more personal data in an obit. 
Dmforcier 02:47, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Not much of a bio
Talk:Isabel Jewell

message: I have added a "questionable source" template for the Classic Hollywood Beauties source. The page is self-identified as a blog, and blogs are usually not considered reliable as sources for Wikipedia articles. Eddie Blick (talk) 20:18, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of blog as source
Talk:Vibraslap

message: Why and where does this article need additional citations for verification? What references does it need and how should they be added? Hyacinth (talk) 00:26, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional citations

message: Athough only a WP:SPS, editors may find the list at this website useful: . Martinevans123 (talk) 11:05, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for that link, but it is unfortunately now dead.   Mentioning the song "Green Tambourine" totally pegged the sound in my mind in a way that a WAV file would not.  I feel we should be careful, however, and seek to prevent the list of songs from becoming a Trivia List.  The reason I migrated to this article was in fact, because I had heard the sound on Elton John's song "Captain Fantastic and the brown dirt cowboy" and had asked my husband, a percussionist, what the name of that instrument was.  All he could do was attempt to give me a physical description.  That didn't help since even though I am also a musician, I had never seen what I knew as "an artificial jawbone."  Having 3 to 4 songs that feature the sound effect prominently and then listing them, allows the reader to run on over to whatever streaming site they use and hear it in use in a song. LiPollis (talk) 08:50, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Popular music examples 

message: Okay, to be honest, i have never in my life heard this instrument referred to as a 'vibraslap'. Instead, I normally hear 'donkey rattle'. I also did a little online research (read: Google search) and I found that there are actually several places where it is referred to as such. Aparently, it's because the original instruments were made using donkey teeth. Should we add that name as an alternative, at least so that if it's searched people end up here?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.138.65.119 (talk) 17:30, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternative names 
Talk:Angelle Tymon

message: WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 22:57, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: No way I'm risking a 3RR over this, but why revert out her single status? If she gets married, we'll change the article. Right now her bio on GSN, about as reliable a source as you can get, says she's single. This is hardly WP:BLP material, so I can't understand the reversions. We might as well revert out that she lives in L.A. because she might move tomorrow. Getting a boyfriend or posing with a guy on MySpace doesn't make you un-single, last I checked. Casey Abell 21:34, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Marital status
Talk:George Curry (Wild Bunch)

message: George Curry appears in the article A Timely Arrival https://archive.org/details/annalsofwyom15141943wyom pages 63-67. He was involved in a showdown in Gillette, Wyoming a supply town for the Hole-in-the-Wall gang during the mid-1890s. He was saved by a heavily armed group of his friends who intimidated officers and stopped them from killing him.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr. Satterly (talk • contribs) 01:56, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: George Curry in Gillette, Wyoming
Talk:Compound (fortification)

message: I've removed this sentence on grounds of POV, it needs a citation to justify inclusion:
:"Compound is often used in the media as a form of ritual defamation.  The use of 'compound' to refer to the former Branch Davidian church near Waco, Texas is a classic example.
(Note also the lack of article on 'ritual defamation'.)
Rexparry sydney 02:55, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sentence removed
Talk:Gorongosa National Park

message: I removed this material below from the main page because it is not particularly encyclopedic. A link for tourists is in external links which should be adequate. I also wonder about plagiarism in this article. --Filll (talk | wpc) 13:23, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  I removed this material  

message: Jeeb (talk) 15:38, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Added! jonkerz♠ 16:05, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need a location map! 

message: This section is written froma strong point of view, mainly from this edit, which replaced a different but also strong pov. It needs cleanup and reliable sources.Babakathy (talk) 19:17, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mount Gorongosa 
Talk:Valentine Phantom

message: A definitive date would be nice. My family lives in Montpelier, one sister swears she saw the hearts pre-1994, another thnks it was mid-90s. Anyone have older pictures? There are some good photographs on the links, it would be great to have some posted here too. CApitol3 03:19, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Valentine Bandit
Talk:M2 4.2-inch mortar

message: The table shows the effective range to be 500-something yards. I think that is the minimal range. Paul, in Saudi (talk) 10:37, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: You're correct. The problem seems to be in the infobox that is being used; inside the box only the term "range" is used as opposed to "minimum range" or "effective range". The article will have to explicitly bring out the difference. W. B. Wilson (talk) 16:30, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Effective Range?

message: I changed some of the metric units to include US standard units using the convert template, as in , which gives this result: . In doing this, I assumed the rounded US units were the original ones, so the ranges stated are in hundreds of yards. Two significant digits gives a result in hundreds of meters. I also reworded the section on the three parts of the mortar. The template was only added in the part sourced to the Korean War small arms article. In the infobox and the part of the article sourced to the US Army technical manual, I left the metric units unchanged, as presumably the metric numbers are taken directly from the source. Roches (talk) 19:08, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changed some units to use the convert template. 
Talk:Monoidal t-norm logic

message: Very pleased to see a  section before launching into the technicalities, as it's often difficult for non-specialists to get a handle on why we'd bother exploring such arcane and abstract mathematical structures.  Yet, unfortunately, beyond the early link to T-norm, much of this text duplicates that in .  This is not very helpful!  As an encyclopaedia, Wikipedia tries to explain technical subjects with a minimum of jargon, but a maximum of precision within the constraints of the necessary paraphrases.  But here, even the lead paragraph is so full of technical jargon that it would scare off all but the most determined enquirer.  Frankly, I'm not at all sure how to make this material more accessible to intelligent enquiry.  Yet the writing needs improving, without sacrificing accuracy.
Does anybody know of a more accessible (popular or undergraduate) exposition of any of this particular material on fuzzy logic?  Or know enough to help translate the ideas into less formal ones?  Or have some hints on increasing the readability of this text – say, for example, using diagrams?  yoyo (talk) 14:59, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It occurs to me that what should be the key point in the motivation is that the residuation property reflects the equivalence in deductive logic between  A,B \vdash C  and  A \vdash B \to C  (a proof of either can be transformed into a proof of the other, by adding an extra modus ponens or implication introduction step). The left-continuity of the t-norm is only needed to have equivalence between  a * b \leqslant c  and  a \leqslant b \Rightarrow c . 130.243.68.38 (talk) 12:57, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

text: I (same editor as previous remark, though at a different IP address) have today finished a rewrite along those lines, and removed the "too technical" cleanup template from the Motivation section. 95.199.149.236 (talk) 08:42, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Motivation and jargon 

message: Still missing from the motivation section is any insight into why we want an idempotent ‘and’ \wedge in addition to the t-norm ‘and’ \otimes. 95.199.149.236 (talk) 08:42, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Motivation still missing: the other and 

message: The article should eventually explain what the attribute 'monoidal' in the title signifies. Presumably not just that * is the operation in a monoid, since any t-norm is already by the definition of that stated to be the operation in a (commutative) monoid. Is it perhaps rather related to the way the attribute figures in monoidal category (which besides associativity of \otimes also places requirements on its interaction with the \mathrm{Hom} functor \longrightarrow)? 130.243.68.38 (talk) 13:11, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meaning of monoidal in topic
Talk:Rotary Youth Exchange

message: Some large sections appear to be copy-pasted from the official site - e.g., this is remarkably similar to the "Application" section of the article. Nikthestoned 13:39, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violation problems 

message: Hello, if anyone has independently traveled during their rotary youth Exchange can you describe the prosess they needed to go through to get rotary's permission 31.25.156.4 (talk) 06:21, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  travel
Talk:Miguel Condé

message: The page has been updated with external links to reputable sources that validate Miguel Condé's biography.
Also linked Guggenheim Latin American Fellowship in article to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Guggenheim_Fellowships_awarded_in_1974
MiguelConde.info 04:05, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What's with all the "Mexican" categories and the like about a U.S.-born person who has spent his working life in Spain? It deserves an explanation, else removal. Gene Nygaard (talk) 11:45, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Explanation: Miguel Condé is a Mexican citizen. --MiguelConde.info (talk) 15:08, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Mexican?
Talk:William Green (British Army soldier)

message: Very nice and interesting article, congratulations author :)
I think I've spotted two minor errors, but being new to Wikipedia, I don't yet dare make any changes myself:
* In the last paragraph of Retreat to Coruña, it says he was mortally wounded. Surely this means that he died of his wounds!!! As he lived to a ripe old age, should 'mortally' not be deleted or changed to 'badly' or something?
* In 1812 he was awarded a pension of 9d day. Then in 1849 it was increased to ... 9d day. Is this a typo?
--BodegasAmbite 08:34, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:Xaltocan, Tlaxcala

message: This article confuses two xaltocans. One is the island city in lake texcoco inhabited by the Otomi people before the spanish conquest. Lake texcoco is now dry and this xaltocan is a part of Mexico City.  However both of the sources used are about a second place called xaltocan, namely the modernday municipio of Xaltocan in the state of Tlaxcala. This mixture means that in fact nothing stated in the article is correct. I will take steps to amend this situation shortly but will start by placing a totally disputed tag on the article so that readers will know the information is unreliable.·Maunus· ·ƛ· 13:35, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Taken care of now.·Maunus· ·ƛ· 14:26, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Disputed tag
Talk:Ending Happy

message: who played the old man who wife got shoot bilbo151@msn.com
: James Whitmore  HTH HAND —Phil | Talk 21:56, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:MAPNA Group

message: I have changed the article according to my own wording. I will try to develop the article using reliable sources in the future. So please keep this article for the mean time. (Arash the Archer 04:02, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for rewording it.  I don't see any copyright problem anymore, so I'm removing the templates. --Butseriouslyfolks 04:31, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion
Talk:Lundomys

message: This is a poorly-named page.  Lundomys molitor is considered "Lund's Amphibious Rat" and the page title should redirect to that, or to the genus Thryonomys, as this genus' two species are named the lesser and greater cane rat, which is the closest common name for a mammal I can find to "cane mouse".TeamZissou 04:12, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename
Talk:Revolverheld

message: Revolverheld needs a picture! Please could someone upload one? I found a great CC Licensed one on flickr, but it wasn't made for commercial use :/. (Me-pawel 12:37, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture

message: There is no discussion about this, so I guess I should make a start. Well, according to a comment at the top of the article, the band name is written in lowercase, because Revolverheld‘s official site says so. Ever thought about the fact that it's just a style of writing? When I look at their MySpace page and the official site of their label, there is no sign of a lowercase band name (except their logo). Even the German Wikipedia article writes this name not lowercased. I suggest to rename this article, because there is no clear proof to write the band name in lowercase.--Totie (talk) 18:59, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: After more than two months, no reaction appeared. So I guess it's okay when I remove the lowercase.--Totie (talk) 11:18, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Band name lowercased 
Talk:Guyver: The Bioboosted Armor

message: ANN DVD complete DVD Complete Mania.com --KrebMarkt 19:19, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm concerned about just dropping in links to reviews across the net. reviews tend to reflect the writers personal experience and due to their nature, will contain incongruities and blatant mistakes. I don't see what purpose this serves other than potentially damaging the integrity of the article.Drag-5 (talk) 14:57, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Both Anime News Network and Mania.com have been vetted as reliable sources for their news coverage and accompanying reviews, so these aren't just random bloggers with no editorial oversight. They have just as much credibility as reviews by noted film critics. The links to the reviews are being placed here to await use in the article at a future time. It also helps us establish if the subject of the article passes the notability guidelines. —Farix (t | c) 00:59, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: while I understand what you say and can not help but agree that they may in some way be considered credible sources, I did read through that review from mania.com and found many things that were said that were untrue. for example, the reviewer makes reference to another guyver tv series. there was no other tv series and i think this reviewer is referring to the two 6-part OVA's. if you think this can be overlooked then i will say no more on the matter. I just don't want misinformation to be spread about. Drag-5 (talk) 03:12, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review(s) 

message: 
I oppose the merge since this is about the anime version and that is about the manga version (linked to it).  I think there is enough material for them to stand alone and since it has been tagged for almost 2 years without comment I removed the merge with proposal tag (but will understand if others choose to restore it.) RJFJR (talk) 14:56, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal
Talk:James Vance

message: All the text came from  I've cut it all out except for the little bits I had added. The question is is this entry needed? All the information is in the Judas Priest subliminal message trial which is where all the references come from, He has no notability outside the case and I am unsure what else could be added which isn't covered in the other section or the references they link to.
It is worth noting that there are otehr James Vances - specifically this comic creator  (the reason I ended up here anyway) so we could speedy delete the whole of this mess and start from a clean slate. Thoughts? (Emperor 04:18, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copy violation

message: redirecting to Judas_Priest#Subliminal_message_trial, as this stub adds nothing that isn't in that article. Lugnuts 16:25, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  redirecting 

message: I've made this a disambiguation page now there is James Vance (comics). (Emperor 15:22, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambig
Talk:Mark Tronson

message: Ian, Welcome to the wonderful world of Wikipedia.
I've reverted your attempt to create an article about Rowland Croucher... You seem to have been using the Tronson article as a guide, and published your stuff inside the article about him.
Best to put the name of the person you want to create an article about in the search Wikipedia facility, and it will then invite you to create an article if it doesn't already exist, and give some simple guidelines. All the best. Ron Cameron 04:23, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Hair restoration

message: I've noticed a trend in wikipedia's coverage of hair transplantation. They all seem overly eager to advocate Follicular Unit Transplantation, and read far too much like advertisements for those providing this service. It looks like many of them may have been written by a single individual promoting the procedure. While this one of the standard methods of transplantation, wikipedia's coverage should not be so narrow or biased as to direct individuals with glowing reviews rather than organized, cited information. Cleanup requested. --70.227.157.118 04:27, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spam? 

message: This page (restoration) is exclusively about transplantation.  Shouldn't 'restoration' include other topics besides just transplantation?  This page also pales in comparison to Hair_transplantation as far as depth of information, although the citations are just as weak....  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.183.233.46 (talk) 04:43, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Hair_transplantation]] vs [[Hair_restoration]] 

message: Redundant article. This should be merged with management of baldness. 2600:1012:B11F:7C91:C4E6:1C4E:37CC:1F90 (talk) 22:43, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger
File talk:Wild shortbeak echidna.jpg

message: The correct license template is , see .  --Iamunknown 04:36, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. howcheng  {chat} 05:35, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thank you.  --Iamunknown 05:46, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Conel Hugh O'Donel Alexander

message: Alexander said something that I think was extremely witty but I am hazy on the detail and reluctant to try to include the following in the article itself -- if someone knows more, it would be nice to add this.
When Alexander was given some honor, he was asked by a reporter whether he was now a Knight. He said something like, "Oh no, barely [or "not even"] a tempo."
Not sure the reporter would have understood the pun, where Alexander is indicating that his value is far less than the chess piece and more close to the advantage of, say, having the first move in chess.--Jrm2007 (talk) 22:19, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another Quote 
Talk:Terry Norman

message: I marked this as NPOV due to its claim of Norman being an informant, without any proof as such. 130.101.31.31 04:43, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I haven't read the books cited, but isn't it a bit strange to mark an article with NPOV without having checked the references? "Proof" is a slippery term - if reliable sources say that he was, and no reliable sources say that he wasn't, we say that he was, I think. --Alvestrand 05:28, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This page lists 1944 as date of birth at the top, but '49 at the bottom.
Varlaam (talk) 20:06, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  1944 or 1949? 

message: The section of the article, currently written as; "There were several reasons why Norman is commonly cited as being involved in the beginning of the police action:" seems to be referring to the shooting by the National Guardsmen. Is this accurately described as a police action, or would it be better described as a mass shooting, or massacre?--Senor Freebie (talk) 02:38, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Police action"?
Talk:Black Widow (2005 film)

message: For any editors concerned, there is a proposed moved at the disambiguation page Black Widow. If you have anything to add to the discussion, please do. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Black_Widow#Proposed_move Weebro55 (talk) 03:59, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed move at Black Widow. 

message: - in germany, FSK rated this film FSK 12 (one can see it from the the production company names (Enigmatico Films/Holland Park Productions)); seems to have the same distributor in germany as the other 2005 Black-Widow film which is E-M-S New Media AG (Dortmund); a bit confusing, at least in germany; as there is no german article, i put the info here for later use. -- 217.224.208.78 (talk) 11:25, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  certication 
Talk:Mitchell–Lama Housing Program

message: Edits to the Policy section of this entry are being used
as advertising for www.tenantsandneighbors.org. This does
not conform to the NPOV policy.
* It appears you are right; after a second read.  Accept my apologies on the edit revert.  Best. Smoove Z 04:51, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Advertising
Talk:Operation Wilno

message: This is confusing. Can Operation Wilno refer to pudding too? "Operation Wilno" was an invented title to an article. It was established that the title to the 1919 event was pure WP:OR, and therefore changed. The 1944 event also has no basis in being called "Operation Wilno", and it too has been changed to its proper title, Operation Ostra Brama. Dr. Dan 17:00, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course it can. No question about it. Just look at those references . LOL. M0RD00R 06:48, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Can Refer to Anything?

message: Please provide sources for Operation Wilno, not any other names. This is how this page is called, so this exact name must be referenced. Otherwise it is OR. M0RD00R 06:16, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As it was number times said - it is simple ORIGINAL RESEARCH.M.K. 11:48, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Translations are not OR. Plus, see for ex. . -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  13:13, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It was distinctly explained on why this article needed to be deleted (talk) regarding the so-called translation. BTW, who is author of this "source", is it an academical page, sef-published? Does it conform to WP:RS? M.K. 15:26, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

text: Wilno is also used in English publications and is closest to the original naming. Case closed.--Molobo 19:24, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Simply provide the requested citations and the case will indeed be closed.Dr. Dan 22:37, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Case closed indeed: none of the claims can be backed up. -- Matthead discuß!     O       03:04, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources