lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Template talk:Maryland

message: Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. states/state templates lists and displays all 50 U.S. state (and additional other) templates. It potentially can be used for ideas and standardization. //MrD9 07:16, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  U.S. state templates 

message: Finished harmonizing Template:Maryland User:BigBang11 00:05 PST 24 March 2006 (UTC)
:Umm yeah, wasnt really harmonized. --Boothy443 |  trácht ar 08:09, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Harmonizing Template:Maryland 

message: The previous Notable Cities list seemed to pick cities at random so I replaced it with one based strictly on population with a cutoff of 20,000.  
Baltimore 636,251
Columbia 88,254 (unincorp)
Silver Spring 76,540 (unincorp)
Gaithersburg 58,091
Rockville 57,100
Frederick 57,009
Germantown 55,419 (unincorp)
Bethesda 55,277 (unincorp)
Bowie 53,840
Towson 51,793 (unincorp) 
Hagerstown 37,536
Annapolis 36,217
College Park 25,350
Waldorf 22,312 (unincorp)
Greenbelt 22,176
Laurel  21,048
Cumberland 20,957
from http://www.census.gov/popest/cities/tables/SUB-EST2004-04-24.xls, unincorporated populations looked up at http://censtats.census.gov/cgi-bin/pct/pctProfile.pl Kmusser 19:21, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This seems to be more/less the design of the page til recently, however it's still inconsistent (ignores many cases, and equates cities to unincorporated areas).  The cities went down to 10,000 to get the "notable ones".  I split out the CDPs and listed those down to the same level.  A little larger than I'd like, but paring everything up to 20,000 will simply start the special-cases over again. Tedickey (talk) 23:10, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable Cities 

message: There is currently an ongoing discussion regarding standardization of state templates (primarily regarding layout and styling) at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U.S. states/state templates. An effort was made earlier this year to standardize Canadian province templates (which mostly succeeded). Lovelac7 and I have already begun standardizing all state templates. If you have any concerns, they should be directed toward the discussion page for state template standardization. Thanks! — Webdinger BLAH | SZ 22:48, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Standardization of state templates 

message: I added Elliott City because it has a population of about 55000 and it is the county seat. Made a note here because my previous addition (Poolesville) was removed. Thanks --Hdt83  Chat 09:05, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ellicott City
Talk:Steven Wright

message: To add to this article: where Steven Wright lives (is it Los Angeles?). Also, whether he has ever been married. 173.88.246.138 (talk) 04:55, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  To add to article 

message: Not to be confused with the death of popular British DJ Steve Wright, age 69 who died on 12/13 February 2024. Jaymailsays (talk) 17:12, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death of Steve Wright
Talk:Eastern oyster

message: Note to Drew0000 - sorry to revert your edits if you were trying to do something useful, but it looks as if something had gone wrong - the whole article had gone inside the taxotable.  I couldn't find any new content you'd added.  seglea 03:45, 23 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I cleaned up the taxobox in accordance with Wikipedia:WikiProject_Tree_of_Life/taxobox_usage and I added a picture I took of an Oyster bed.  I'm hoping this is acceptable.  JohnCub 13:25, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image and taxobox 

message: Missing Disease
Many oyster populations experienced high mortality rates in the 1950’s which was determined to be a protozoan parasite (Haplosporidium nelson) which at first was called “MSX". MSX stands for multinucleated sphere unknown. MSX reduces the feeding rates of infected oysters leading to a reduced amount of stored carbohydrates. The reduction in stored carbohydrates inhibits normal gametogenesis in spring and a reduction in fecundity (Kennedy 1995). Gibby is gibby (talk) 21:09, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  MSX

message: In a few days, I'm going to be adding a couple of sections to this page as part of a conservation biology class I'm taking. The sections I would like to add include the life cycle, composition of the shell, and effects of the oil spill. Please feel free to check out my sandbox and give me any suggestions you may have. I hope it will be acceptable. Laurasill1 (talk) 01:00, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sections to be Added 
Talk:Blizzard of Ozz

message: Inconsistency in Royalties dispute
It seems to me that there is a touch of POV on the royalties issue:
Daisley and Kerslake deny the allegations of "abusive behaviour" and continue to battle for royalties owed them for their work on Blizzard of Ozz
This presumes that Daisley and Kerslake are correct in their royalties claims.  Since the dispute also appears to be ongoing, I am curious why Daisley's and Kerslake's perspective is accepted.  Is there a strong consensus outside wikipedia that their claims are correct?  If so, it might be more constructive to cite such commentary rather than speak for them.Blaimjos (talk) 04:34, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled

message: Are you sure this album isn't hard rock?  It sounds way more hard rock to me than metal... MarthsBullet (talk) 01:12, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Heavy Metal

message: In the second paragraph, it sounds like the release date of the 2002 rerecording was 2011, which doesn't make sense.  What was being released in 2011?  Tdimhcs (talk) 17:11, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release date unclear 

message: The BPI website says the album was released on 12 Sept 1980. The Official Charts website says the album first charted on 20 Sept 1980. These two dates come from very reliable sources, and they make sense chronologically. 
Ozzy.com says the album was released on 20 Sept 1980, which is impossible because it charted that same day. Albums must first hit the retail sector and be purchased before they chart; the process takes a week or so at the fastest. Per WP:CONTEXTMATTERS, we must conclude that the Ozzy.com website is wrong about release date. They probably confused release date with first chart date, which is a fairly common mistake. 
Note that Ozzy.com gave only the release year in  October 2005 and in January 2006, before the May 2006 date when Wikipedia first displayed the incorrect date of 20 Sept. After May 2006, Ozzy.com eventually copied the wrong date from Wikipedia, which is a case of Citogenesis—a form of circular reporting. 
As always when getting to the root of these things, the official chart and certification websites are preferred. Binksternet (talk) 04:36, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  BPI release date versus Ozzy.com date
Talk:Foederati

message: Feud has an obscure and complicated derivation probably from Germanic rather than foedus and it shouldn't be instanced here. So I'm removing this to discussion: The words federation, feud and feudalism are derived from the word foederati, describing the restructuring of German tribes into emulation of Roman culture. Obviously, the word foe applies here. Some professional linguists should work on this knot. Sorry, don't mean to suppress text. Wetman 04:13, 23 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Feud

message: Please redirect 'foederatus' to this page. Zigzig20s 21:28, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  redirect 

message: I repeat here what I've written in the talk of laeti page. It may be useful for someone competent to explain the difference between laeti and foederati if there is known one because it's really not obvious for not historian. VeNoo (talk) 04:18, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Laeti and foederati
Talk:Ticketmaster

message: What is Ticketmaster? A corporation or a company? The article lists that it is a corporation at the start but then the infobox lists it as an LLC? What is it's legal name ending? WiinterU (talk) 02:28, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corporation or Limited Liability Company? 

message: Ik krijg nooit geen code op mijn gsm om verder te gaan 94.109.109.96 (talk) 10:55, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geen code
Talk:The Final Cut (album)

message: "recording.. with Holophonics" -   --Tpyvvikky (talk) 23:16, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

message: As tagged in the article itself, is there a better way to format the 1987 Chris Salewicz interview used a couple of times than to link it to a fansite? (which wouldn't be allowed anyway but especially not in a well-sourced FA like this). It's from the June 1987 issue of Q.--TangoTizerWolfstone (talk) 01:23, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh yeah, I forgot to report back but I've since cleared this issue up.--TangoTizerWolfstone (talk) 02:13, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  1987 Salewicz interview
Talk:Isreal

message: I was talking to someone today about Wikipedia, and they asked why there wasn't an entry for "Isreal". I figured it was a common enough misspelling that it deserved a redirect page, but checking now, it seems there aren't any links to this page after all. So maybe it's not important. --ESP 04:55, 23 Mar 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not just about pages that link to a misspelling, it's also about what people search for.  In that regard, you are completely justified.  Just look at the number of redirects to Matthew McConaughey.  RADICALBENDER★ 04:58, 23 Mar 2004 (UTC)

text: I agree Replaceinkcartridges (talk) 00:04, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Vaccinium vitis-idaea

message: Much more information is needed about commercial production.  It is hard to believe that all the lingonberry jam Ikea sells around the world is wild harvested. -69.87.203.227 14:32, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I was just taking issue with this statement "It is seldom cultivated". Ikea is a massive chain and sells jam and I believe several other products all based on lingonberry.--Crossmr 19:05, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commercial production 

message: From the article: "Lingonberries collected in the wild are a popular fruit in northern, central and eastern Europe, ((snip)) , where they can be picked on both public and private lands in accordance with the European tradition of "everyman's rights" ". 
The Freedom to Roam slash Everyman's Right only applies to Norway, Sweden and Finland in this case, Poland, Baltics and Russia do not have such a tradition. Haven't got a clue how to reformulate though. -- Pepijnk (talk) 10:23, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: How about "and in some areas they can legally be picked on both public and private lands in accordance with the freedom to roam"?  The article freedom to roam is the place to go into details about the legal differences in different countries. Kingdon (talk) 02:32, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds like a good idea to me! Bergsten (talk) 07:45, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Kingdon (talk) 14:49, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uses / everyman's right
Talk:Ruffe

message: Why do we need the names in other languages for this particular fish?  That's not something we usually do (for the good reason that the linked articles in other languages should provide them, so there is no need).  If there is a reason for including them, then it should appear in the article.  If it's just a trend you'd like to start, it probably ought to be discussed in Talk:WikiProject Tree of Life.  A lot of species handbooks do do this, but they don't have the possibility of linking through to native versions as wikipedia does - and nor do they recognise the very long list of languages that we do.  seglea 06:33, 23 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I believe that the use of "we" in the last section is unprofessional in an encyclopedia article.  The section(s) should be rewritten. Caeruleancentaur (talk) 18:11, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "We" 

message: I want to add a link to the Species Fact Sheet through GLANSIS. Please see below. 
GLANSIS Species FactSheet
I've been asked to do this for many species, as upgrading the website broke a lot of links to other articles. Would people be upset if I did this?
Thanks!
Greatlakesavenger (talk) 16:22, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Link to GLANSIS 

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Gymnocephalus cernuus Pärnu River Estonia 2010-01-06.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on April 16, 2013. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2013-04-16. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:44, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Gymnocephalus cernuus Pärnu River Estonia 2010-01-06.jpg]] to appear as POTD
Talk:Rank–nullity theorem

message: Why does "Rank theorem" redirect to this article?128.135.239.238 (talk) 02:20, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rank theorem 

message: Can't u show all the process of proving the relation : rank(T)+Nullity(T)=Dim(V)
-- I've posted a proof of this (DriveOnTheAutobahn/128.253.69.185) 
The proof (notation mostly), should be modified so that it works for infinite dimensional vector spaces, at least, this should be mentioned, since it is in the introduction. Lewallen (talk) 00:20, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proof 

message: Surely V can't be infinite dimensional? How then would it's rank be well defined?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.78.171.187 (talk) 20:58, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infinite-dimensional 

message: Anyone know any of the history of this result??  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.234.196.119 (talk) 16:15, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who proved this? 

message: Nomenclature looks wrong/ambiguous (not defined in article).
Specifically, shouldn't  nul(A)  be  dim(nul(A)) ?
—DIV  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.17.136.99 (talk) 07:38, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: nul(A) is fine; the nullity is defined as the dimension of the kernel: nul A = dim(ker A). Joel Brennan (talk) 16:54, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomenclature 

message: This article relies too much on non-elementary symbolic operators. The symbolic statements should be accompanied by English versions of the ideas expressed, so that novice readers can decipher them by following links from the English words. The article states the theorem in language that may be unfamiliar to anyone who is unfamiliar with theorem -- in other words, the only people who can easily understand this article are people who probably already know what it's going to say. 
At first glance I see: Hom(...), dim, Im, Ker., ≅ (as used here), := (as used here), \mathbb{F}, etc. ---- 69.193.134.179 (talk) 20:46, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, and I have tagged  the article accordingly. D.Lazard (talk) 17:13, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terminology 

message: PRODded as a duplicate article under a nonstandard term, but a user objected and suggested merger. This makes sense, since this article is more clearly written then the other one, which is too heavy on symbolic math. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 13:07, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Fundamental theorem of linear algebra]] into [[Rank–nullity theorem]]
Talk:Genebank

message: I'd like to suggest that this page and seedbank are exchanged. A seedbank is one instance of a genebank, in which true seeds are stored. But there are also field genebanks, tissue culture genebanks, frozen genebanks, and so on.
If the main entry were for genebanks, with definitions and details of the other kinds, I think it would make more sense.
--JeremyCherfas 07:43, 23 Mar 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Kabar

message: Kavar is also the name of a somewhat prominent character from the Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic. Problem is, Kavar redirects to this page. How can this be resolved? Imperialles 20:36, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kavar and Star Wars 

message: Dear Nostradamus1, the reason I have reemoved your original research about Turkic Magyars is because it is original research and irrelevant to the article. The Reoprt which I have provided is taken from several authors such as Bunardzic, Zivanovic, Wexler, Erdelyi, Vikhnovich, and Brook.82.6.29.26 (talk) 10:45, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: 82.6.29.26, There is no original research in my contribution to this article. Magyars were and still are not a Turkic people. However Kabars were undisputedly a Turkic people. Source point to the Kabar origin of the Arpad dynasty and the three of the ten tribes migrating to present day Hungary being Kabars. Your edits were simply nonsense. In that part of the world one should doubt what the local historians say since it's all clouded by ethno-nationalism. I'm not sure whether Hungarians deny the Turkic origin of the Arpad dynasty but the Bulgarians have recently produced the Iranian origin theory for Bulgars and are uneasy about the Turkic origins of their Asenid, Terterid, and Shishmanid dynasties. So let us not bring in local historians and testaterone talk into this and stick to credible sources. --Nostradamus1 (talk) 01:36, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of Magyar Material

message: Bulgarios has added a number of things that are ethnocentric and misleading. I propose to simply revert the page back due to his bias.
::His edits represent a non-widely accepted POV. Most Hungarian historians agree that the Kabars were not the ruling tribe of the Magyar tribal confederation. These scholars say that their role during the Magyars' military campaigns show that the Kavars were a subject people, that is why the Kavars provided the vanguard during attacks and the rearguard during withdrawals. My problem with Bulgarios' most edits that his sentences are not connected to the Kabars, or their connection to the Kabars is unclear. Borsoka (talk) 16:28, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I can see that the passage you object to was first inserted back in 2007 by User:Nostradamus1 then removed by  User:Briangotts  and User:213.16.74.75  and User:82.6.29.26 . However, the objection is more than a decade old and the insertion remained for more than a decade after the conflict was resolved. A külföldi történészek jelentős része ezt úgy veszi, ők voltak az uralkodó törzs. Moreover a reliable source has been provided. Nevertheless, I'm happy to re-word it since there have clearly been a few presumably Magyar POV leaning editors who have been offended by it. How about "a scholarly theory proposes that the [] were...." etc. and then the Hildinger reference? The paragraph about the Magyar invasion can then be shaved down quite a bit as I too feel it is rather unecessary. Bulgarios (talk) 21:57, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bulgarios' recent edits
Talk:Homosexual sexual practices

message: Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Same-sex sexual practices
---
This has been removed without debate again?! Marnanel 01:07, Apr 13, 2004 (UTC)
:Unfortunately, the decision on Different-sex sexual practices was to merge. The decision on this page was to keep. I merged. I say this discussion should continue on Human sexual behavior.Hyacinth 01:17, 13 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  From WP:VFD
Talk:Sensitive periods

message: Given that this article is about a theory by Montessori, perhaps the title should be changed to reflect that. If it is not intended to be on Montessori's views only, it should be expanded to included the views of other researchers and scholars. Tpylkkö (talk) 08:16, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poor title?	 

message: I have redirected this page to critical period, with which this topic appears to be virtually identical (the main reference work used appears to treat "critical/sensitive periods" as near-synonymous, according to its title), and of which the page constituted little more than a POV fork (to the extent that Montessori pedagogy maintains a theory of such periods that differs significantly from other, mainstream theories covering the same issue). I only skimmed over its contents though, and found that in particular the section about language acquisition was woefully inadequate. There also was a totally disproportionate "background" section about the biography of Maria Montessori; no idea how anybody could ever have thought that belonged here. Fut.Perf. ☼ 19:33, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirected
Talk:List of fetish artists

message: I know Eve Ellis is a model and performer, but is she also a fetish artist? -- Karada 11:31, 23 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The hair fetish page List of women with very long hair has been nominated for deletion. It has similar aim as your list. please write something intelligent in its deletion discussion entry :Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_women_with_very_long_hair. Longhairadmirer 22:38, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please help your "sister list" 

message: I suppose Milo Manara, Guido Crepax, and Paolo Eleuteri Serpieri could be included here. Stormwatch 06:12, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  More artists 

message: Why has Dolcett been removed and the article deleted ? Hektor 07:53, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Dolcett
Talk:Tron (computing)

message: TODO: mention the Tron movie ?
----
Also TODO: mention the TRON character set? It's why Unicode links here. -  — G↭a⇅a | Talk 01:44, 19 Jun 2004 (UTC)

message: Are there numbers to support this bold claim: As of 2003, the TRON system (TRON OS) is the world's most used operating system, being present in millions of electronic devices. --Pjacobi 22:34, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Numbers