Talk:African Union

message: The maps depicting members and suspended members have a mistake - they indicate Guinea as being suspended instead of Ivory Coast. Guinea's membership in the AU is just fine. It's Ivory Coast that's been suspended.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.11.195.241 (talk) 03:01, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've recoloured the Central African Republic, but you might need to refresh to see it.  Also, I don't think we need to depict unrecognized states on this map.  TDL (talk) 20:18, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong Country Suspended on Maps

message: The sections on interventions in support of democracy and military interventions need serious work to consider (in particular) all the work of the Peace and Security Council.  I have deleted the material under the 'elsewhere' heading as irrelevant to the AU - though the conflicts mentioned are real, there is no discussion of any AU role, and in many cases there is in fact no AU involvement.Africa annotator 12:19, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled entry

message: The Democratic Arab Republic is recognized by the AU as a member, so the map on the page should reflect that.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.235.169.143 (talk) 06:31, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've fixed it. IDX (talk) 18:21, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Western Sahara

message: I would cherish some referenced information on debate (if any) on the effectiveness of the AU. Is it supported? Entrenched? Or is it all just talk?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.178.10.72 (talk) 00:13, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Effectiveness

message: Could someone explain why the union has Spanish as a working language? Equatorial Guinea is the only country on the continent where Spanish is spoke and there are hundreds of languages in Africa which have more speakers.  Aaker (talk) 23:27, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official languages 

message: Reading the article and seeing the obvious parallels between the established EU and the fledgling AU, it is obvious that the AU was at least in part inspired by the broad success of its European counterpart.  Can any editor substantiate this?  Was any admiration for the EU's goals and structure made by any party druing the set up of the AU or its predecessors?  juux ☠ 20:21, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inspired by the European Union? 

message: Someone please add that Mauritania will be suspended (again) for a coup (again). Source: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/7551531.stm 76.18.160.16 (talk) 08:59, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mauritania Re-Suspended 

message: Does anybody has some answers about this:
*Who participates for Somalia in the AU institutions? Is it the provisional "government"? 
*What about Somaliland (which seceded in 1990), are they in any way represented? Der Eberswalder (talk) 20:05, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about Somalia and Somaliland? 

message: Is the AU supporting the bid to set up the gTLD .africa?  If not does the AU have plans for a ccTLD like the EU's.eu?68.148.123.76 (talk) 06:09, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: According to Wikipedia (!) The .africa domain came into effect in 2017. I don't know the answer to an African Union domain (but it couldn't be .au of course, which is Australia). Gabrielbodard (talk) 08:20, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  .africa 

message: New stub. --TS 16:26, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: What is this post supposed to mean? Tomeasy T C 10:39, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Maputo Protocol]]

message: Just a thought, but If you look at Commonwealth of Nations you'll see that suspended members are shaded a different colour on the map, I think that should be done with the 2 suspended countries in the AU.  Taifarious1   03:22, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This indeed is unacceptable. I changed back to an older map which acknowledges the border between the two. Tomeasy T C 10:15, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map 

message: Don't have time right now, but could someone remove all the linked AU acronyms and turn them into simple AU? No point linking a hundred times to a disimbaguation page. YeshuaDavid (talk) 13:24, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This has been done. VIOLENTRULER (talk) 21:17, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  AU 

message: Missing flag!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.92.236.9 (talk) 17:21, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed long time ago. Tomeasy T C 10:38, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flag 

message: Two things: It shows Ethiopia as including Eritrea, which is wrong, and it shows the Sinai to be outside the union, which is also incorrect. Zazaban (talk) 21:11, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This has been corrected. Tomeasy T C 10:24, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problems with map 

message: The introduction to the article states that there are 53 member states, while the infobox says that there are 52.  146.115.21.211 (talk) 02:56, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed it to 53 and added this source . unfortunately, the collapsible list in the infobox has the problem that it cannot show more than 50 entities. the last three member states are, therefore, truncated :-( Tomeasy T C 10:37, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: can you mention the 53 state 105.112.179.151 (talk) 17:03, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  52 or 53 members? 

message: :File:Flag of the African Union 2010.jpg
The African Union adopted a new flag on 31 Jan 2010.
Refs:
http://www.africa-union.org/root/au/Conferences/2010/January/summit/pr/en/en%20pr%2024AU%20NEW%20FLAG%20(2).doc
http://www.africa-union.org/root/AU/Conferences/2010/january/summit/14thsummit.html
:Thanks for the info. Would be nice if they (AU) made a better file format available... Tomeasy T C 08:36, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  New flag 

message: Since this edit in early November 2009, the article claims that Eritrea is currently not a member of the Africa Union. Since this edit has never been disputed, I was stupid enough to change the map accordingly. Now, I am wondering whether there is any evidence for this. I have just found evidence that speaks against this claim:
* The African union themselves still list Eritrea as a member.
* A news report that Eritrea called back its diplomas from the AU. For me, this qualifies for suspended membership at best.
As I see it now, I will have to revert my edition to the map. Accordingly, the article will need to change as well. Tomeasy T C 10:22, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I changed the fact. Eritrea is now listed under "Suspended Members". I changed the maps accordingly. Tomeasy T C 07:45, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Eritrea

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Mkativerata (talk) 01:34, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: Why is the population said to be half a billion when the population of Africa is around one billion?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ASmartKid (talk • contribs) 00:25, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population wrong? 

message: According to the news,Ivory Coast ins no longer under suspension
http://www.france24.com/en/20110421-african-union-overturns-revokes-ban-suspension-ivory-coast-membership-bloc-ouattara-gbagbo
--31.47.11.31 (talk) 20:20, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Ivory Coast suspension

message: The page should be updated with regards to the current situation in Libya. The page still lists it as a member, even showing the tricolor flag of the opposition National Transitional Council. The AU, however, has decided as of 27 Aug, 2011 not to recognize the NTC.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.231.225.255 (talk) 12:47, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It all seems quite updated now. Cheers, Chipmunkdavis (talk) 13:52, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Libya 

message: The current flag bears striking similarity to the "Gaddafi style"; it wouldn't be surprising if this wasn't designed by him. Is there any info on the details of the flag's history/adoption? Why was it changed? Tachfin (talk) 16:34, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Gaddafi flag? 

message: Is that phrasing intentional and ironic?
Given who gets to chair the AU, perhaps a reference of this kind is reasonable.Varlaam (talk) 17:31, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  A "great leap forward" 

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:45, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Flag African Union.svg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant 
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 13:05, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Flag of the African Union.png Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: The article states that The Gambia is a member of the AU, but the map is unclear on this. The map shows The Gambia as grey with to lines of dark green across it like an "x," which is very confusing.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.131.206.108 (talk) 18:07, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I can see what you're talking about, but the image is correct (see a blown up version here.)  Not sure why this is.  TDL (talk) 04:16, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Can't see the problem myself. Perhaps it's just due to the thinness of Gambia? CMD (talk) 19:14, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gambia on Map 

message: The membership number (52) in the info box is incorrect.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Julien Houle (talk • contribs) 23:29, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: TDL (talk) 05:04, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  INFO BOX 

message: The history and foundation of the African Union and the importance of Libya in it and the rational behind it all. As it is portrayed on the articles the geopolitical importance and differences an evolution is completely missing.  79.168.7.70 (talk) 06:23, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some more visibility should be given to... 

message: We'll need more information covering both Mali (a conflict now coming to a close) and the Egyptian coup and subsequent suspension.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.233.197.69 (talk) 14:40, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion Request #2 

message: The original Constitutive Act named "if possible, African languages, Arabic, English, French and Portuguese" the "working languages" of the African Union. In a 2003 amendment "working languages" were renamed "official languages", and the list was expanded to "Arabic, English, French, Portuguese, Spanish, Kiswahili and any other African language". However, I see no indication that the 2003 amendment was actually ratified; in fact, the AU treaties page doesn't give a date for "entry into force". Thus for all I can tell (and for all the AU says), the old Constitutive Act is still in force. A YouTube video of a press release by one politician from a single country is not a reliable source on the official status of languages in the AU absent written confirmation that the AU actually agrees with him, which I cannot find. All I did find was an undated document reiterating that the 2003 amendment had not yet been ratified by enough countries to enter into force, particularly in the context of the status of Spanish within the AU. Thus I'd say we should base our coverage on the unamendend Constitutive Act unless there are reliable sources confirming that it has been amended. Huon (talk) 02:58, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official languages redux 

message: Not a member but holds territory on the African mainland and in African waters (Canary Islands). Should be listed as not a member along with Morocco. Legacypac (talk) 09:56, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm rather skeptical about that - are there reliable sources discussing Spain in the context of an AU membership? I'm pretty sure such sources could be found for Morocco if necessary. Huon (talk) 10:18, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

text: Yes, they should be grey. Someone should update the map. Kind regards, Smile4ever (talk) 10:58, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spain 

message: When Obama addressed ‘the African Union’, to whom was he talking?  Was it the Pan-African Parliament or the Assembly of the African Union, or something else? The text (see link above) says ‘Address to the People of Africa’, ‘African Union Headquarters’, ‘Members of the African Union, distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen’...? – Kaihsu (talk) 18:14, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Obama addresses ‘the African Union’ 

message: So the list of AU summits has been expanded; Thanks to User:MarnetteD. However, it seems such a list would rather be on its own page. Its a very long table and I think could be moved to its own page. Moreover, if it is moved to its own page, we should start creating individual pages for each of the summits. Sputink (talk) 13:31, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I hae no idea why you have pinged me. I have not edited the article and all I did on this talk page was check the modified external links. As to your question you might ask at the WikiProject Africa to get more input. MarnetteD|Talk 14:59, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Im sorry I accidently clicked on Talk Page History rather than Article history and automatically assumed you conducted the massive edit. As for Wikiproject africa, seems like a relevant place to ask the question. Thank you. Sputink (talk) 15:21, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  African Union Summit  

message: An IP is repeatedly moving Turkey to the start of the list of observers (ie here ), breaking the alphabetical order.  No explanation has been provided for why Turkey should be exempted from the ordering of the rest of the list.  Is there a legitimate reason for this proposed change?  TDL (talk) 17:15, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The IP now has a name: , however is still non-communicative.  TDL (talk) 03:09, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Turkey alphabetical order in list of observers 

message: Are there any citations for the long list of member observers?
According to http://www.un.org/en/africa/osaa/pdf/au/au-handbook-2014.pdf only Haiti is an observers. The other states, like Serbia, Turkey, ... are only accredited to the AU. See https://au.int/en/organs/Non-African-States.
BernhardSchmalhofer (talk) 11:00, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Member Observers 

message: update the Euler diagram 
SammyMajed (talk) 20:57, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Morocco

message: I don't see anything about the Single African Air Transport Market here nor as its own article on wikipedia, why is that? Sion8 (talk) 03:08, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Single African Air Transport Market? 

message: Why is the Somali name (Midowga Afrika) listed as an official name in the infobox despite the fact that Somali isn't listed as an official language? It just doesn't make sense to me why Somali would be included but not other African languages with more speakers and official status in other member states.Last edited by: (talk) 21:16, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Somali official name? 

message: Since the portal for related articles was deleted, any possibility of recreating and maintaining a better one? Community participation would be helpful. I think the subject is rather broad and a portal would definitely be helpful as long as it keeps to Wiki guidelines on portal.Tamsier (talk)
* What is the general thinking about use of Wikipedia portals (e.g., on European Union) vs series (as on this article's page)? Neither Wikipedia page (on Portals nor Article series) mentions the other, so there is no discussion evident there for how to choose one or the other. - Inkwzitv (talk) 19:38, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Portal 

message: Sudan has been re-admitted to the AU, see https://www.evangelisch.de/inhalte/160049/07-09-2019/sudan-wieder-volles-mitglied-der-afrikanischen-union (sorry, in German) and many more. So the map should be re-adjusted. [And this one is in English: https://www.africanews.com/2019/09/07/african-union-welcomes-sudan-civilian-cabinet-lifts-suspension/]. --Vanellus (talk) 17:56, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suspension of Sudan 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:06, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion 

message: === Top of page infobox ===
I'm thinking of creating an infobox template for a transnational government (or some such) that could be used to replace/expand the infobox currently at the top of this article's page.  It would include sections for its official bodies (similar in nature to the one on Federal government of the United States that uses Template:Infobox presidential government) and maybe be informed by the European Union's infobox.  Such a template could take on some of the information from the AU series infobox lower on this page. Thoughts? - Inkwzitv (talk) 19:38, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infoboxes 

message: I'm thinking of creating an infobox template for a transnational government (or some such) that could be used to replace/expand the infobox currently at the top of this article's page.  It would include sections for its official bodies (similar in nature to the one on Federal government of the United States that uses Template:Infobox presidential government) and maybe be informed by the European Union's infobox.  Such a template could take on some of the information from the AU series infobox lower on this page. Thoughts? - Inkwzitv (talk) 19:38, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Top of page infobox 

message: The infobox that is part way down this article's page that describes itself as "This article is part of a series on the politics and government of the African Union" includes a section titled "Institutions".  That list is a mix of now-obsolete entities (e.g., OAU, which was replaced by the AU), defunct entities (e.g., Casablanca Group) and others.  I think it would be more useful to list current official bodies (such as in the Politics section of the page text that is currently to the left of this infobox).  And maybe add a section to this infobox for affiliated organizations (tho' I'm not sure how to bound what might be added to an "affiliated" list). Thoughts? - Inkwzitv (talk) 19:38, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  AU series infobox 

message: WP could use a section, or a whole separate article, on Africa CDC - AfricaCDC<dot>org  . I am not currently able to create it myself. Acwilson9 (talk) 19:30, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (Africa CDC) 

message: Hi, I created a new version for the euler diagram: :c:File:Supranational African Bodies-de.svg
I think in the diagram used for this article (:c:File:Supranational African Bodies-en.svg), there are missing members.
I mentioned it at the filetalk: :c:File_talk:Supranational_African_Bodies-en.svg#missing_members --Mrmw (talk) 18:22, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  missing members in euler diagram 

message: We all know that Africa composes of 54 countries and they are all part of AU but eventually most school textbooks in my county say 55 so please help me decide as I need to know as a school student 2C0F:F8F0:81B2:0:E42C:A261:6423:C230 (talk) 18:10, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  54 or 55 countries 

message: In subsection Africa-EU_relations:
: "it had worked out the African Peace Facility"
Should it be "they" (African Union and the European Union)? Or does "it" refer to one of them? Or something else? This needs to be made clear. 
--Mortense (talk) 10:23, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who is "it"? 

message: Please update the African Union members map to show Guinea as a suspended member. Source: https://www.france24.com/en/africa/20210910-african-union-suspends-guinea-after-coup-ousting-cond%C3%A9 —Amaan4210 (talk) 00:56, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map update 

message: Due to the recent coup in Sudan (the 2021 one for the readers of the future), Sudan has been suspended again from the African Union. https://au.int/en/articles/sudan-suspended-african-union  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Macchiato blu (talk • contribs) 12:20, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sudan coup d'état and suspension 

message: The African Space Agency has been officially inaugurated, so this article should be changed to reflect that (and presumably a full article should also be created) 212.186.238.122 (talk) 10:22, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  African Space Agency officially inaugurated 

message: I think there should be a new section that discusses historical initiatives and planned initiatives that goes into the vision people have for the AU, such as the African Continental Free Trade Area and possible evolution into a single market, and the Afro monetary union. I suppose the United States of Africa would be relevant here as well. I think it would make sense to collate these under one clear heading for the reader Alexanderkowal (talk) 16:11, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Initiatives