lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Pubic symphysis

message: I'm not expert BUT:
this article seems to confuse diastasis of the pubic symphysis with pelvic girdle pain. 
Quote from this wiki page: "A diastasis of the symphysis pubis is a symptom of pelvic girdle pain(PGP)." 
They aren't the same thing (are they??). Pain in the pelvic bones in late pregnancy is fairly common, a result of a softening up of the connective whatever between the bones. Can result in instability.  Strong pelvic floor muscles keep the pelvic stable and moving properly even though the bones aren't fused solid.
I just feel the info on this page doesn't ring quite true yet...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by RobertDeBures (talk • contribs) 14:01, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Biological Dynamics of Forest Fragments Project

message: A rather obvious omission from this page is the findings from the project.  It was set up to test a rather well-defined problem about ecosystem fragmentation, has produced a load of publications, but the article contains nothing about its results.  I suppose I could dig around myself, but I'm sure someone here knows the "answer" already.  Most likely it's heavily qualified, but it'd be nice to have a single sentence that starts "Generally speaking, ecosystem fragmentation causes ...".  Cheers, --Plumbago 11:44, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  And the answer is ... 

message: As part of a class project, my group member and I are suggesting changes be made to this article. I am submitting two sections, one about the biogeography of the study area and one concerning the future of this and other fragmentation projects.
The section about the study area will cover how the experiment was established, the general climate conditions of the area, and the types of species found in the area. These factors will be tied into how fragmentation effects the area and will lead into a discussion of the results of the experiment. There will be an extensive description of the theories and concepts that led to the project's hypotheses and development. 
Due to the extensive and diverse nature of the experiments preformed on the BDFFP site, methods and results from the project will be discussed through descriptions of various experiments. These examples will include experiments that focus on edge effects, plant-animal interactions, fauna communities and populations, affects on species diversity and richness, soil chemistry, biogeographic history and tropical forest plants. Each example will include a brief description of the methods used and the results found, with an explanation of how the fragmentation effects were involved in the findings. There will also be a description of research and findings that carry implications for conservation and management practices in forest fragments. 
Other members' submissions will include background information of the project.
Wildlifegroup3 (talk) 19:49, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additions
Talk:Nuchal ligament

message: The article says the nuchal ligament is "unique to humans as it is required by bipedal mammals for running", but then later says 'The "paddywhack" is the nuchal ligament of sheep, cattle or the quadruped.' So obviously it's not unique to humans. The article on giraffes, for example, talks about the nuchal ligament of the giraffe. Where did this notion come from that the ligament is unique to humans? That's why I marked this phrase as dubious. Maybe I should have just removed it.
Huttarl (talk) 12:44, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I have amended the above. I have now added the tag to the claim it is a "Rudiment". The nuchal ligament is supposedly absent in Australopithecus. ie the theory would seem to be that it is a convergent feature needed for supporting the head. Thus the "nuchal ligament" of the giraffe and that of the human are not on the same evoluntionary tree. Tom Pippens (talk) 10:20, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Dubious

message: I can't find a reliable source to corroborate the "nuchal ligament" meaning of 'paddywhack'. For example, it's in no reliable dictionaries that I can find. (Not Merriam-Webster Unabridged, not Oxford English Dictionary, not American Heritage, etc.)
CorCaroliRegisMartyris (talk) 14:37, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paddywhack 

message: I propose merging Paddywhack into Nuchal ligament. I think the content in Paddywhack can easily be explained in the context of this page, and a merger would not cause any article-size or weighting problems. I note that User SpinningSpark added a link to that page with edit summary "There is an article on this specific meaning. Maybe it should be merged, but right now it is separate". I also note that the only information in that stub article that is not here is evidence that Nuchal ligament is called "paxwax" and "paddywhack" when speaking of butchery/pet food. That article cannot be further expanded without repeating information in this article, and Wikipedia is not a dictionary, so an article on that name is WP:UNDUE 212.159.115.41 (talk) 11:37, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  OK the proposal has been up a week and it's a small consensus, but clearly in favour of merge. I will leave it another day and then proceed with merge on the lines of the above. If anyone thinks I should wait longer, please say so. 212.159.115.41 (talk) 09:32, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Costovertebral joints

message: More logical to have this ligament, contained within a joint, within the article of the joint itself. Tom (LT) (talk) 00:18, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I was going to do this uncontroversially, but had trouble  with calling the infobox (and hence the Wikidata links and automatically generated parameters) from the other page. These might be helpful to readers. There is usually a method for doing this, but I can't find it on the infobox pages; thoughts? Klbrain (talk) 07:26, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Can't see a way of doing this for the ligaments infobox (it is possible for some others). Therefore, proceeded without.  Klbrain (talk) 17:03, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[:Intra-articular ligament of head of rib]] into [[:Costovertebral joints]]
Talk:Jacques Berque

message: Whidden in Daileader-Whalen (2010) has a list of references at the end of the chapter listing about four dozen works by Berque, as well as eight sources about him, including Brett (1979), Demeerseman (1988), Eickelman (1995), Gellner (obit; 1995), Hourani (1991), Johnson D. (1964), Kedourie (1992), and Said (1978). Mathglot (talk) 19:36, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional sources
Talk:Belur V. Dasarathy

message: It appears that the subject of this article is not especially noteworthy - are you going to continue developing the article? docboat 11:49, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll add more to this - just need some time. Herrnieman 14:32, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Noteworthy?
Talk:Yong Peng

message: There are many details to be added and corrected. Let's work it out
I know we are all from Yong Peng :)
Streetmilitia 11:24, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

message: I note that this assertion here "After World War II, the British came back to power. Initially, the British did not seem to be willing to keep their promise for giving independence back to Malaya. In fact, they started demanding the returns of weapons from the guerrilla fighters and all the remaining Sultans in the Peninsular were forced to give up their sovereign power."  This is wrong and badly distorted history.  British did not promise Malayan independence until well after WWII and only did it as a mean to resolve the Emergency.    Please avoid using rhetoric and make sure that history is correctly presented when writing for wiki.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.168.224.86 (talk) 00:00, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Faulty history 
Talk:Jaimal Singh

message: Wow, okay this article really needs help.  Bad grammar, written like an advertisement, no sources.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.173.110.234 (talk) 22:45, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This short description of Baba Jaimal Singh might help the lay reader.  But maybe, a scholar can write a more detailed (more academic?) article.  Before I did some minimal editing and wrote the lead, the article was a verbatim copy-and-paste job from the Tarn Taran website.Oliver Puertogallera (talk) 03:01, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite suggestion

message: There is a photograph of the subject titled Baba-jaimal-singh-ji.jpg at wikicommons. It has been added to the article a few times over the years (most recently by me) before it was deleted from the article. Does anyone know what the reason for its deletion from the article was? If it was due to disruptive editing/trolling/vandalism, I will attempt to re-add the image to the article. ThethPunjabi (talk) 04:45, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding image of article subject to infobox
Talk:Jaume Ferran i Clua

message: His real name was Jaime not 'Jaume'. You can check his books. He always signs with the name Jaime. Never 'Jaume'
P.E
(National Library of Spain)http://bdh-rd.bne.es/viewer.vm?id=0000055899&page=5
LABORATORIO MUNICIPAL MICROBIOLOGICODE BARCELONA
SOBRE LA RABIA Y SU PROFILAXIS
1887
JAIME FERRÁN Y CLÚA
BARCELONA. —1889 2001:CE8:110:C194:38F2:26D5:5410:916A (talk) 16:03, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Please check it. Check as well the Spanish Wikipedia 2001:CE8:110:C194:38F2:26D5:5410:916A (talk) 16:05, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  His name was Jaime Ferrán y Clúa, no 'Jaume'
Talk:Jake Swirbul

message: Much of the content is copied from here (the link is listed as external link). Also, the article cites his reason of death as pneumonia - which is, I guess, the result of mixing him and  Leroy Grumman, who did suffer from this. Ori Redler (talk) 14:54, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Copied?
Talk:Sacrospinous ligament

message: The ligament is called ligamentum sacrospinale, according to "Atlas of Anatomy" by Gilroy et. al.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:4651:3B18:0:15AD:557C:8C16:7C87 (talk) 19:20, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Latin name is wrong.
Talk:Jakow Trachtenberg

message: I just looked at the webpages of the ETH Zürich's math faculty and an affiliated research institute, and neither mentions Trachtenberg. I also did a quick Google search and found this question on Google Answer; it seems
to me there is no mention of any institute founded by Trachtenberg on the web. Unless someone can provide a source for this statement, I'd like to remove it soon. -- Minvogt (talk) 10:13, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: From the preview of "The Trachtenberg Speed System" : "In 1950, Trachtenberg founded the Mathematical Institute in Zurich, the only school of its kind. [...] Children ranging in age from seven to eighteen make up the daytime enrollment. But the evening classes are attended by hundreds of enthusiastic men and, women who have experienced the drudgery of learning arithmetic in the traditional manner. With a lifetime of boners back of them, they delight in the simplicity of the new method." Apparently, this Mathematical Institute was a private school which provided some math coaching for children and some adult education. --84.130.138.199 (talk) 12:03, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Mathematical Institute" unsourced 

message: I'm not sure Trachtenberg was Jewish. I think that is an assumption and you know what they say about assumptions-they make an ass out of you and me. Redding7 (talk) 00:14, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nationality 

message: How did you arrive at this statement? He was not critical of Nazi system as late as of 1933 and this
to such account that he published on his own expenses some booklet in defence of reputation of new German
authorities that was tarnished without any reason in all Jewish concerns. Booklet was published in 3 languages:German, French and English, so that all all educated mankind had a chance to read it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.226.95.16 (talk) 20:31, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Critical of Nazi system?
Talk:SLOSS debate

message: A rather obvious omission from this article is the result of the debate.  It's ostensibly been raging for more than 30 years - surely someone has an answer now?  Or, more likely, at least derived some "rules of thumb" from the assorted experiments that took place in the wake of this debate.  I wouldn't expect anything entirely cut-and-dried from ecology!  Cheers, --Plumbago 11:44, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Completely agree, without a brief synopsis of the present consensus (or even the present state of the debate) this article has the feel of something that wasn't finished.Wheezybabs (talk) 14:24, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Missed Plumbago's comments a mere 4 years ago. In part the unfinished state of these articles is my fault. On the other hand, the answer to the SLOSS debate was, in essence, "yes" or "it depends". Need to get back to work on these... Guettarda (talk) 14:37, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

text: I have created an image as I could not find a suitable one that was freely available.Brittany Mendrikis (talk) 03:10, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

text: I have added a subheading in under alternate theories as I feel the information in the subheading is better presented as bullet form.Brittany Mendrikis (talk) 03:24, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  And the answer is ... 

message: — Assignment last updated by Naeim9146 (talk) 21:48, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: ERTH 4303 Resources of the Earth
Talk:James Augustine Healy

message: Since there is an article Healy family, in which all the siblings are discussed at length, and some have their own articles in addition, it seems inappropriate to have so much discussion of them here.  They should be discussed in their relation to James, if at all. I plan to delete their material or reduce it markedly, per above comments.Parkwells (talk) 23:22, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Siblings under different article

message: Healy did not self-identify as being Afircan-American and he should not be put in African-American categories.  We categorize by ethnicity, not by race, which means if someone did not publicly identify as having a given ethnicity they did not have it.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:56, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: At the time it would often have been prejudicious to self-identify as African American if going for a high office. I would suggest that you find a delicate method of wording that incorporates his background with the article here, without needing for him to self-identify as partly African-American, rather than try to delete the whole category. Ephebi (talk) 00:47, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  John continues to damage this page now 8 years later and has also attempted to vandalize the Joseph Oliver Bowers along the same lines. He is deleting categories as well. natemup (talk) 23:06, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not African-American 
Talk:Interosseous sacroiliac ligament

message: The y ligament is the strongest ligament in the human body and not the interosseous sacroiliac ligament as indicated. (Livista (talk) 13:25, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi ! Thank you for noting this. I have clarified this in the article. Bibeyjj (talk) 13:03, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interosseous Sacroiliac Ligament 

message: I am a little confused as to the difference between the interosseous sacroiliac ligament and the axial interosseous ligament. Does someone with more knowledge understand this? Thanks! Bibeyjj (talk) 13:03, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Axial Interosseous Ligament
Talk:James Bennett Griffin

message: I changed the date of death of Griffin from 17 May to 31 May. The date is not referenced and I can find no source online to confirm it.
However I did find three sources stating 31 May 1997 as the death date: here, here and here. Mill 1 (talk) 07:37, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death date James Bennett Griffin
Talk:James Blades

message: I feel a little bit uneasy reading that he used a tam-tam and following the link, because it doesn't really correspond very well with what I remember of a lecture I attended in about 1976. His "gong" was suspended from a small frame and was about 12" diamter, perhaps slightly bigger. It would be nice to trace its current whereabouts. Vince Calegon 10:44, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  gongs/tam-tams 

message: I loved James Blades. My mum took me to see a talk he did at Welbeck Abbey (Nottinghamshire), i'm estimating early 1970's? He was fascinating. He told us about his various activities and involvements including the gong used to introduce Rank films back in the day. The gong shown on film was papier machè apparently. He did hit a gong, repeatedly, to demonstrate the power of the soundwaves. He ceased before he brought down the walls.
Then i met him again on the QE2 in 1976. He was my doubles table tennis partner. A great player he was too. I believe we won the tournament.
A lively, lovely, kind man. I will never forget him. 46.208.38.35 (talk) 19:12, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  My memory of James Blades
Talk:Green Ronin Publishing

message: Should have a section on the prominent employees, who founded the company and who's doing the big products. Rycanada (talk) 00:15, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Also, the product listings should be moved to a "bibliography" page of its own. This page should be fleshed out with short introductions to each major game line (assuming thereis a link to a complete description). The history is also insufficient - mention should go to how Freeport propelled Green Ronin from relative obscurity to a place as one of the most well-known d20 third party publishers. Finding sources on this without turning to online media will be as difficult as usual, though. CapnZapp (talk) 10:53, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Page structure

message: I can't check these all out while at work, but here are some sources that include interviews, etc. about the company.
*Interview 
*Interview 
*ENnies Award  - check other years too - they have several
*Origin Awards  - at least a nomination - need to check all the pages
Much more out there. Turlo Lomon (talk) 18:49, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional sources
Talk:James Broderick

message: Somebody inserted "Joseph" as his middle name (27 March 2010), after "Wilke" had been entered (17 Oct 2006), then deleted (6 Dec 2007), then re-added (16 Feb 2009), then deleted (15 Nov 2009, citing IMDB as source, altho IMDB doesn't talk about the middle name).  Then the "Joseph" entry, without a credible reference.  I changed it back to "Wilke", since that name is in Matthew's genealogy tree, which seems the most reliable source so far.  Anybody have a better source for the "Joseph" bit?  Raymondwinn (talk) 12:12, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It was on the Who Do You Think You Are? show, which is pretty definitive. All Hallow's Wraith (talk) 19:49, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Middle name

message: Although Broderick served in the Navy during the World War II era, there are no reliable sources found as of yet state that he was in a war zone during the war. More specifically, the sources do not establish defining role in World War II. Accordingly, "Category:United States Navy personnel of World War II" was removed until a defining role is established. Semper Fi! FieldMarine (talk) 08:00, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: World War II service
Talk:James Brown Scott

message: I removed this: "He edited and translated of Francisco de Vitoria the "De Indis recenter inventis" and "De iure belli" (1917)." because it clearly isn't true: Scott was merely the series editor, contributing a couple of pages of preface, as can be seen from this online edition: .
Some preceding text in similar style, about Scott's special interest in the great 16th century Spanish law school, may therefore be wrong as well: or it may be right. Perhaps someone else can clear that up. Andrew Dalby 16:04, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: For some reason Andrew Dalby didn't actually make this change, and it's gone unmade for nearly three years since he pointed out its necessity.  So I just did.  -- 76.15.239.115 (talk) 02:23, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Erroneous and doubtful text
Talk:James Burrill Angell

message: I am removing the following paragraph from the University of Michigan section:
:In 1902, Angell inspired the formation of an elite senior leadership society at Michigan. Known for most of its history as Michigamua, the organization renamed itself after Angell in 2007. The organization is now named "Order of Angell" and its mission is "to advance exceptional leadership through a lifelong loyalty to and engagement with the University of Michigan."
Whether Angell had anything to do with the foundation of this society is very much in question, and there is no citation to back up the assertion he was. Moreover, this information is not especially relevant to the section in question, and more properly belongs in the section on commemoration, where very similar wording already exists. Sarcasmboy (talk) 00:03, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing redundant/out-of-place paragraph on Michigamua
Talk:James Lee Byars

message: This is an excessively long list of works so I moved it from the article to talk.  We should select representative or significant entries for the article instead of trying for a comprehensive listRJFJR (talk) 18:20, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Works

message: "The estate of the artist is represented by Michael Werner Gallery, New York, London and Cologne." This is an extremely unusual inclusion in an article like this, the first I have seen. It smells of commercial PR. I would suggest removing it. Robocon1 (talk) 08:40, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, . Done. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 14:11, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Art Market' 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://moussemagazine.it/james-lee-byars-momaps1/ and http://press.moma.org/2014/04/james-lee-byars/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 14:11, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:James Calvert Spence

message: I've removed the importance tag from this article: the article details his pioneering role in the development of social pediatrics. Clicketyclack 14:50, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Importance