lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Fred Rogers

message: Beginning in 2002 and continuing until it was moved to Latrobe in October of 2015, the Monroeville Mall (located outside Pittsburgh, Pa.) had a play area specifically designed for younger children (specifically, all of the play equipment and the decoration is designed to be safe for children under 7 or so. This is different from the usual play areas that are often dangerous for younger children.) called Mister Roger's Neighborhood. It was always popular and well used by the patrons of the mall and was truly a refuge for harried parents with young children. In as much as it was a tangible and practical tribute to Fred Rogers, it should be mentioned in an article about him. 2601:545:8000:CC0:AC4E:AB13:3CB8:F8A0 (talk) 04:43, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: 2601:545:8000:CC0:AC4E:AB13:3CB8:F8A0, this is a fine idea, but it needs a reliable source before we can include it. If you find it, I can help with putting the info in Rogers' bio. I also suggest that you find a username and register for a Wikipedia account.  Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 21:43, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested addition to the Fred Rogers Page
Talk:Anthropology

message: — Assignment last updated by Janyu150 (talk) 20:38, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - FA22 - Sect 200 - Thu

message: What does the lede mean in saying that ? Does this mean that linguistics falls under the umbrella of anthropology? And, if so, is this actually the case? (Linguistics of course is not equivalent to linguistic anthropology.) Wolfdog (talk) 13:08, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The sentence is saying anthropology studies humanity, and lists several major concepts which intersect with that study of humanity in the field of anthropology. The opening paragraph then goes on to clarify/explain for each of these subjects. For "linguistics", the paragraph specifies:  --Pinchme123 (talk) 15:39, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Gotcha. I guess my question is, why do we list the intersections as: human behavior (a broad concept), human biology (an entire science of its own), cultures (a broad concept), societies (a broad concept), and linguistics (an entire science of its own)? This just seems semantically (maybe grammatically-semantically) odd to me. Would it make more sense to list "here are the broad concepts anthropology covers" and then, in a separate sentence, "here are the scientific fields that intersect with anthropology"? Wolfdog (talk) 19:13, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: (ec)Given the specifications provided in the very same paragraph, I do not see an issue. In the same way that none of the broad concepts or the other entire science, as you've described them, are wholly subsumed under anthropology, neither is linguistics. I'd also note, the AAA article used for sourcing the sentence in question specifically states: ""; which is in line with the broader description found in the also-provided Encyclopedia Britannica source. --Pinchme123 (talk) 19:24, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your prompt responses. I do feel like the science of "culture" and "societies" is, in fact, wholly subsumed under anthropology. Would love to hear others' responses too. Wolfdog (talk) 20:47, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: To preface, yes, I would really like others to chime in as well. I will say, sociologists would probably have something to say about "societies", and possibly "culture" too. --Pinchme123 (talk) 21:05, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Linguistics inclusion
Talk:Nonblocking minimal spanning switch

message: I added a diagram of rerouting a NMSS so additional signals can be routed.  (Actually, 2 diagrams).  Let me know if there are any comments on how they came out. RJFJR 21:48, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diagram of rerouting 

message: However, the crossbar switch does so at the expense of using N2 (N squared) simple SPST switches.  For large N (and the practical requirements of a phone switch are considered large) this geometric  growth was prohibitively expensive.
What has the geometric series to do with this? Thanks, --Abdull (talk) 09:03, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Nothing.  It should be geometric growth, I think. Ray Van De Walker 23:14, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geometric series?
Talk:The Moonies

message: Who the f keeps changing this article?Tom Breen 00:45, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Nuclear

message: I don't believe this is a long enough definition for the word Nuclear.  It doesn't have enough detail either.
:Then add the detail instead of complaining. --snoyes 22:03 Feb 27, 2003 (UTC)
I can't believe it. I enter a good site on your article, and I'm accused of vandalism! Thanks a lot Snoyes! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.213.111.51 (talk) 15:18, 30 September 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: You can believe it because nuclear is very fantastic 🤞 41.114.142.96 (talk) 16:50, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

text: Well, there were several problems with your addition. Firstly, this is a disambiguation page, not an article page. If you think your link is relevant to one of the topics listed on this page, you should go to that topic, and add the link there. But also, the link you added does not resolve to a real web site. Maybe you mistyped it? BTW, it wasn't snoyes who reverted your edit. Securiger 15:55, 30 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is the pronunciation really under dispute?  Are there any sources for pronouncing it as "new-kyoo-ler"?
It has to be "new-clee-ar", phonetically.  "new-kyoo-lar" is just a sort of slang.
:"Nucular" is how George Bush pronounces it. It's immature and childish. Shandristhe azylean 22:46, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation? 

message: Nuclear is a form of the word nucleus.  It only belongs in a dictionary, not in an encyclopedia.David R. Ingham 00:29, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nuclear is some of a electromagnets 41.114.142.96 (talk) 16:52, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Nuclear power in south Africa Research please 41.114.142.96 (talk) 16:53, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing page. 

message: Was going to suggest that the now WIDESPREAD ("wrong") nucular pronunciation means that this article needs to mention this debate, but I seem to have been beaten to it. It is elitist vs the common man, it is partisan and political. It is also a bone of contention in UK or USA use of English. The shortened form "nuke" has led to this situation. What a surprise that Bush's enemies are already in evidence here. Some would say that if his pronunciation of certain words is all you can find to complain about then he must be an superb President. We need to mention that the different pronunciations are a cause of substantial argument and mutual antagonism. There aren't many words you can say that about. --81.105.251.160 15:41, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunc, dispute
Talk:Christianity and Islam

message: One of the biggest conflicts in history between Muslims and Christians were the Crusades, but the article doesn't talk about them much. It does have a link on the bottom to the article about the Crusades, but in the sections about history between the religions it barely mentioned anything about them. 64.124.38.140 (talk) 14:03, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The article does not talk about the Crusades
Talk:Military preparations for 2003 invasion of Iraq

message: Moved from Talk:Gulf War (disambiguation) (which this page inexplicably redirected to:
Much of the article fails the test of being neutral.  The NPAC introduction is at best a disputable interpretation of the facts, and at worst misleading, inaccurate, biased partisan rhetoric.  The "opportunity of ages" reference is particularly misleading.  (an quote from NPAC, referenced by a biased source, that the wikipedia article indicates is about 9/11, even though the NPAC quote  was written before 9/11).  In the end, it's non-neutral to the degree that I find it hard to believe the author wasn't intentionally trying to make a statement rather than contribute facts to an encyclopedia.  DO - June 11, 2003
:What are you talking about? This is a disambiguation page and is not an article. Either way simple edit the text to fix the bias. --mav
:: He is talking about Military preparations for 2003 invasion of Iraq whose "discuss" link comes here.  Confusion understandable. --SEWilco 08:32, 13 Aug 2003 (UTC)
Talk:People Against Gangsterism and Drugs

message: Most of this article should be written in the past tense.  The bombing campaign has apparently been over for several years.  Ebrahim was convicted of public violence in 2002 and has been in prison since then.  The article is largely lifted from .  Zaian 21:46, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Past tense? 

message: I placed the NPOV template because this article relies on only very carefully selected information from the citations, deliberately avoiding important information that would convey more positive views. For example, BBC article] also reads notes that the organization "began with the best of intentions, as Cape Town citizens did battle against crime", and that the police force was "corrupt and under-funded".
Information like this is critical to understanding PAGD and the reasons for its founding, yet it has been carefully left out. PAGD arose as a result of the South Africa government's failure to enforce law during the apartheid. This serious and prominent blunder of the apartheid-era government more than a mere "belief"; it's blatant fact—the Cape Flats had serious problems, including poverty, hunger, crime, violence, gangs, drugs, and poor legal enforcement.
  dmyersturnbull   ⇒ talk 22:38, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias 
Talk:February 27

message: The Births section says, "1912 – Lawrence Durrell, Indian-French author, poet, and playwright (d. 1990)" , but "Indian-French" isn't stated in the Lawrence Durrell article? JezGrove (talk) 16:41, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The idea that LD could be in any way Indian or French is really weird: he was born in India, yes, but of Anglo-Irish parents and grew up in a very Anglo culture, never revisiting India after, I think, the age of 12 or less; and French? Because he lived there? I don't think so. Achar Sva (talk) 09:47, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed! Though he seems to have had some problems with his British citizenship. JezGrove (talk) 18:41, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately, there was nothing in the linked article to support this DOB.  I have removed the entry.  Toddst1 (talk) 19:01, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lawrence Durrell - "Indian-French author"? 

message: as far as I can tell this is a moveable feast and should not be here 142.163.195.88 (talk) 04:17, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it shouldn't be included as per WP:EVENTDOY so I've removed it from the list. Thanks for noticing it, Suonii180 (talk) 13:17, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  second day of Ayyam i Ha 

message: Could someone please add Gérard Latortue. Blangland (talk) 15:17, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gérard Latortue
Talk:List of communities in Quebec

message: I've ben prepping to make a disambig at Saint Leon, which currently redirects to an Indiana city/town, as tehre are St. Leon, Manitoba and Saint Leon Hot Springs in British Columbia etc; there are numerous St Leons in Quebec - see here - but I don't know Quebec's geography and particulars enough to add them to your list.....Saint Leon in BC was either named for one of these, or for St. Pol-de-Leon in Finistered, France.Skookum1 (talk) 20:23, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Plase leave a note on Talk:St. Leon, Indiana or on my talkpage if any such articles are created. Thanks.Skookum1 (talk) 20:24, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Saint Leons
Talk:Nova Scotia

message: :</small>
:
:
:
:Danachos (talk) 21:36, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content in dispute: 

message: I propose that the Wikipedia article about the history of Halifax and the HRM, currently found at Community of Halifax, Nova Scotia, should be moved to History of Halifax (former city) and the Halifax Regional Municipality. The name is a bit longer and clumsier than I would prefer, but it's more logical than the current name because it accurately reflects the actual page topic. Feel free to join the discussion. Carguychris (talk) 17:11, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that it should be moved.  The current title is not an accurate description of what the page is about.  I think it could just be "History of Halifax".  It's the general term, and I don't think the title should be too hung up on the details of municipal government. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 02:10, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I actually edited the request to simply History of Halifax, Nova Scotia, which is already a primary redirect. Carguychris (talk) 16:08, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed move for Halifax history page 

message: The topographic map in the "Geography" section is wrong. It shows a border between mainland Nova Scotia and Pictou Island, and that island itself is greyed out as if it were not a part of the province. Pictou Island is in fact a part of this province. All four Wikipedia articles for Pictou Island, including the English Wikipedia article for it, state that Pictou Island is indeed part of it. If someone more experienced than me is willing and able to correct the error, they should do so. JM2023 (talk) 18:28, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Topographic Map Error 

message: Danachos - you are well aware of the dispute involving you, Moxy, and Magnolia677. You proposed significant revisions to the article and received pushback against it, including most recently from me. Disappointed to see that you've just gone ahead months after and made those edits anyway despite the obvious lack of consensus and the obvious disagreement, without so much as a talk page section. I've reverted to an earlier version until consensus can be reached, one way or another. As others have said, this is not the place to WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS and it's not a WP:SOAPBOX. I won't tolerate accusations of genocide denial like you aimed at me last time. JM (talk) 11:41, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverted to an earlier version, as it was at 11:46, 8 November 2023‎
Talk:Deep Space Nine (space station)/Archive 1

message: Shouldn't articles on characters be on subpages, i.e. Star Trek/Terok Nor for this one? (See for example Atlas Shrugged/Hank Rearden for precedent.)   Mkweise 06:13 Feb 28, 2003 (UTC)
:No, subpages are officially deprecated for articles since about a year ago. The Atlas Shrugged pages should be renamed as well, but no one has gotten to it I suppose. --Brion 06:19 Feb 28, 2003 (UTC)
::Seems like a foolish and short-sighted move to me. Where would I find the discussion that led to this decision? Mkweise 06:34 Feb 28, 2003 (UTC)
:::Hell if I know, it was decided before I got involved in the wiki. Search for "subpages" in Wikipedia: namespace and on http://meta.wikipedia.org/ if you're interested. --Brion 06:44 Feb 28, 2003 (UTC)
This page is short and frankly useless, it should be merged with Deep Space Nine.
How can this be acheived? Simondrake 00:15 Feb 19, 2006 (GMT)
:I'll do it. - Brian Kendig 01:55, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Whups, already done - I meant that I'll take care of Teraknor. - Brian Kendig 01:57, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:The Life of Emile Zola

message: I realize that this page is (justly) tagged under Wikiprojects: Judaism, and I wholeheartedly agree that it falls under that purvue. However, while the Dreyfus affair was in fact an example of antisemitism rearing its ugly head, such prejudice is virtually absent in this film. The word "Jew" doesn't even appear in it, owing to Hollywood's stance on antisemitism at the time (check out the documentary "Hollywood and the Holocaust" for this and other examples).
That said, I've removed the phrase "(and much antisemitism)" from the following line of the plot section:
::With little thought (and much antisemitism), the army commanders decide that Jewish Captain Alfred Dreyfus (Joseph Schildkraut) is the traitor.
Since the film itself glosses over such antisemitism, I feel that such a parenthetical remark is POV in this particular instance. Should someone else feel compelled to add a section detailing the film's historical veracity, such section should by all means address this issue. But as a remark in passing that is unsupported by the film itself, it adds editorial comment to a straightforward description of the plot.PacificBoy 20:26, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Antisemitism 

message: @User:Parkwells - Respectfully, this section doesn't make much sense as written. It definitely needs some context in regards to this specific film. There's definitely some interesting and/or encyclopedic info here, but its confusing as written.--Phibesfan (talk) 05:42, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree it is confusing; seems to be missing material.Parkwells (talk) 13:24, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I've combined all the content about 21st-c. controversy, and expanded discussion to provide more context. It doesn't make sense to have it in two places.Parkwells (talk) 14:37, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  21st Century Controversy section
Talk:Sangha

message: The Sanskrit term for Sangha is Samgha(with an m) so why is it that other are claiming it as a Sanskrit term ? Bodhiupasaka (talk) 07:40, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Those are just different transliterations of the same Sanskrit word (both pronounced the same), the latter merely being a more "scholarly" transliteration. Do not disrupt articles if you are unaware of transliterations and explicit word origins. Gotitbro (talk) 08:11, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is Sangha prakrit or sanskrit ? 

message: I think this line in the lead — "It is used in modern times by groups such as the political party and social movement Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh." — should write that this term is used for groups like RSS instead of by groups like RSS because as far as I know people call RSS "Sangha" in short. Lightbluerain❄ (Talk | contribs)  19:09, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  term used ''by'' RSS? or ''for'' RSS?
Talk:Mole (sauce)

message: In the Varieties section, someone put “Citation needed” for the passages “chocolate is also used, which works to counteract the heat of the chili peppers,[citation needed] but its flavor does not dominate”, “Even though the holiday [Cinco de Mayo] is not much recognized elsewhere in Mexico,[citation needed]”
Does a basic statement about human flavor need a citation, and a fact that is recognized by anyone outside the United States need a citation? Does the Wikipedia article for Chili Peppers need to cite that “Chili peppers are widely used in many cuisines as a spice to add "heat" to dishes”? Does the Wikipedia article for Hanukkah need to cite “Hanukkah is a relatively minor Jewish holiday [outside of North America]”? Even scientific journals do not need to cite every obvious fact about basic human senses or common knowledge - why should there be a citation due to likely a biased American adding something due to a potential lack of flavor and knowledge outside of the United States? 90.106.183.185 (talk) 22:03, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  “Citation needed” 

message: Just kidding, but we should much more clearly lay out the various kinds of mole, things thate are/aren't mole (like pipian, which I don't really think is mole but is related). Allan Nonymous (talk) 04:04, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  RFC for what is mole?
Talk:University of Berlin (disambiguation)

message: Hmm? There isn't just one "University of Berlin". There's the HU, FU, TU, or is this a historical entry? please clarify. --snoyes 00:14, 1 March 2003
:That's right, there is not only one University of Berlin. That's why it should link to the List of Universities in Berlin - like in the German Wikipedia. --Wikistar 13:00, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: see also Talk:Humboldt University of Berlin --Wikistar 12:19, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

text: Virtually all pages that have links to Berlin University or University of Berlin have the Humboldt in mind. For 140 years, "University of Berlin" meant the university today called Humboldt; it has never meant anything else. —Angr 11:17, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Right now, University of Berlin redirects to Humboldt University of Berlin and Universität Berlin redirects to Frederick William University. There is then also this disambiguation page that gets linked to at the top of the HU Berlin article. It seems to me that at the least, University of Berlin and its German-language counterpart Universität Berlin should point to the same place, but I don't much care where they point. Can I get consensus about making Universität Berlin point to HU Berlin to go along with University of Berlin? Please comment at Talk:Universität Berlin. Thanks
Remes (talk) 00:06, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: It should be helpful too to add to Universities_and_research_institutions_in_Berlin#Public_universities when the universities were founded. As only after World War II the other universities arose it immediately becomes apparent which was the University of Berlin. 83.85.143.141 (talk) 19:39, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The HU was founded only after WWII as well. Actually, the UdK is the oldest University in Berlin still around. 2003:E4:8F1D:69E9:39DE:B5FD:65ED:E3B0 (talk) 14:08, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirects
Talk:Proto-language

message: If we split the page into two separate articles and redirect it to a disambig page (which I wholeheartedly support), there's the question of what the two articles should be named. In my opinion, just Proto-language (historical linguistics) and Proto-language (glottogony), maybe? What do others think? Take care, --Miskwito 02:45, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Names of split articles

message: – the subject here is proto-language, and an abstract tree diagram with numbers does little to explain it. If anywhere, it belongs to tree model, although that one is better illustrated with some real-world examples. Further, it badly fails MOS:CAPSUCCINCT. In fact, I can't find a single sentence in the caption that does not state the obvious (the proto language of X-Y-Z is named proto-X-Y-Z, duh!). The overall value of such image and caption is negative, as it presents a visual distraction without adding any useful information. No such user (talk) 10:37, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diagram 

message: Nicholas Kazanas is a fringe author and the quote was added by an IP. Ioe bidome (talk) 01:16, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the Kazanas quote DUE?
Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers

message: The redirect Mos:DOB has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Utopes (talk / cont) 21:59, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Mos:DOB]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:WGN-TV

message: Do you guys have any idea what the new logo for WGN-TV will look like after The CW takes over WPWR-TV on September 1, 2016? AdamDeanHall (talk) 20:38, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  New logo for WGN-TV on September 1, 2016 

message: The news article about Sinclair Broadcast Group striking a deal to purchase Tribune Media can mean only one thing: The WGN-TV slogan "Chicago's Very Own" will be gone...forever. AdamDeanHall (talk) 19:13, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chicago's Very Own 

message: The article WGN-TV has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2019 March 20. --AnhDucYang (talk) 22:12, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article reported as a claimed copyvio 

message: Read this news article (https://www.nytimes.com/1984/10/23/movies/film-studio-s-new-approach-to-tv.html), and highlight WGN for proof. RevinCBHatol (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 05:11, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  MGM/UA Premiere Network