Talk:Jajah

message: Extremetech ran an article on February describing Jajah as "not quite spyware, but close" . The article mentions some alarming practices in this service's EULA, as seen below: 
"The company's privacy policy and EULA, however, seem to imply that the service could be used as a window into a user's online activities, including monitoring a user's surfing habits and the content a user posts to message boards and web sites, sending him spam, disclosing personal information to third parties without control and consent, and even potentially allowing a third party to eavesdrop on the conversation."
Perhaps someone might want to incorporate this to the article? Porfyrios 20:43, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Spyware?

message: And therefore it should be deleted—Preceding unsigned comment added by  (talk • contribs) 
I do not agree with this statement.  This seems to be as notable as other VoIP software with articles, although it does need a clean up.  --Skoorb 13:32, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  True... only advertising 

message: I suggest that this article be merged with Jajah Web and Jajah Webphone and then cleaned up a bit.  As it stands all three of these articles are of poor quality.  Any suggestions or comments?  --Skoorb 13:32, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree--Teemuk 10:21, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Also agreed. Jlittlet 03:51, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

text: Also agreed. Alan2here 13:42, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, I just tried to fix the problem and got it wrong, fixed now, well there still seems to be duplicates. Alan2here 15:49, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: Merge with other articles about the same thing. Also it is now a "recomended" (by FireFox) FireFox Plugin. This should be in the article, I don't think the Firefox plugin monitors you'r web activerty. Alan2here 13:42, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge and Add some Stuff 

message: This article is not notable. It does not cite any verifiable references. -- (Pasca 02:50, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speedy Deletion 

message: RolandR removed this, asking readers to see the Talk page, where supposedly there is objection to this as "spam". I see nothing here by RolandR  (or anyone else) referring to this at all. TechCrunch is one of the best known, most respectable on-line sources , and this is a 3rd party review of a new feature of jajah. It is a new development, in line with the dozen others already listed in that section. i do;t see how this is "spam". Isarig 15:14, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I was writing the section below at the time this was posted. --RolandR 15:43, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  TechCrunch review 

message: Email from support@jajah.com:
Dear JAJAH user,
Currently you cannot make free calls, therefore calls to other JAJAH members are not free for you.
If you will make a payment, you will be able to make free calls, and paid calls. The free calls will be free, your credit will not be reduced by making free calls.
Yours,
xxxx
JAJAH Support Team
So I ask again, what does "free" mean to Jajah? And should we be acting as unpaid publicists for their misleading hype? RolandR (talk) 17:43, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: if you read the article you'll see that Jajah does limit your free calls. Pay a little and you'll be ok. Happy138 (talk) 18:11, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

text: You get free calls. You pay a little - you get more free calls. It is mentioned in the article. Happy138 (talk) 18:55, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Do you have this same argument in every shop that offers you "buy one, get one free"? --Escape Orbit (Talk) 22:28, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

text: No; but they don't claim that their offer is "completely free, with no hidden costs". It appears that, since I first complained, Jajah have amended their website to clarify what they mean by "free", so it would seem that they agree that their original claim was, at the very least, unclear. But this is not properly reflected in our article, which still reads like an advert rather than an encyclopaedia article. RolandR (talk) 00:30, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  originally it was free, but after a while they altered it. I think the article represents that fairly. Happy138 (talk) 10:06, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Free calls? 

message: this article is a advertising of the jajah service.
In my opinion, it must be deleted asap. !.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Crosemffet (talk • contribs) 13:58, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree. Happy138 (talk) 16:01, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  It's only advertising 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Jajah. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100106131241/http://www.jajah.com:80/prices/? to http://www.jajah.com/prices/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080828190625/http://www.forbes.com:80/technology/2007/10/04/ebay-jajah-skype-tech-cx_rr_1004jajah.html to http://www.forbes.com/technology/2007/10/04/ebay-jajah-skype-tech-cx_rr_1004jajah.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130119080256/http://www.ymessengerblog.com/blog/2012/11/30/updates-to-yahoo-messenger-features to http://www.ymessengerblog.com/blog/2012/11/30/updates-to-yahoo-messenger-features
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100122045223/http://www.jajah.com:80/support/faq/general/? to http://www.jajah.com/support/faq/general/#10
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110719141007/http://www.jajah.com/downloads/press/jajah_press_free_calls_0606_en.pdf to http://www.jajah.com/downloads/press/jajah_press_free_calls_0606_en.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070217162058/http://www.jajah.com:80/info/help/faq/freecalls/ to http://www.jajah.com/info/help/faq/freecalls/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:50, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified