Talk:Kinesthetic learning

message: This article should be deleted along with visual and auditory learning, or perhaps changed to redirection pages to VAK. I don't suppose there's much research on any of these so called modalities apart from each other. Piechjo (talk) 16:33, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Please propose for delete if you think it appropriate. However, I would suggest it better to keep the article and include information that 'debunks' the concept. Jonpatterns (talk) 16:43, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

text: Thanks - I basically agree, but the scientific evidence is already on the page Learning_styles and there's no obvious reason to have three or more separate pages debunking the different aspects of this theory, pages which will inevitably end up out of sync and thereby cause confusion Neezes (talk) 18:25, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

text: In that case it sounds like the WP:Merge processes could be an option. Jonpatterns (talk) 11:46, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Delete

message: It is spelt Kinaesthetic (with an A)- though I disagree with the above comment.  This page should not be deleted, audio, visual and kinaesthetic are all relevant learning styles and refered to frequently in current teaching practise.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.217.6.9 (talk) 01:42, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling

message: I looked up Kinaesthetic learning, after hearing it from a student interested in tutoring. So it certainly merits an entry. On the other hand, the present article is shoddy. The one citation isn't even an accurate representation of the cited material:
"There is no evidence of the efficacy of kinesthetic learning [1]."  The article gives evidence for and against the use of kinesthetic teaching techniques, and goes on to say that employing kinesthetic teaching techniques improves learning outcomes across the board (rather than for just a defined set of 'kinesthetic learners'), which both sides of the debate agree on.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.188.23.17 (talk) 00:43, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Quality

message: Isn't it sort of sketchy to say "they concentrate on two things at once", since there is no proof that the brain can even do that? I read before that it is believed that the human brain can shift between two things fast, but not actually do things at the (exactly) same time... - Julix —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.232.156.146 (talk) 23:02, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Simultaneous brain 'actions'

message: Somehow this page doesn't come up when the term Kinesthetic learning is put into a category tag on the Alexander technique page. (I'm spelling it the same as the article heading title is spelled.) What's up with that?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.91.105.73 (talk) 09:46, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Search visibility

message: I'm a student working on a project for one of my classes. We are looking to edit this article some and add some references to how kinesthetic learns may behave. We are also debating on strengthening some areas with some of our research. Any thoughts on what else needs to be edited? Craig.Murphy392 (talk) 02:56, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, and welcome! Just some general remarks about your editing project. If you are all new as Wikipedia editors, it's good to start with relatively small edits and learn from what happens with them (are they kept or challenged?) so you know a bit about how wikipedia works before you add your major edits. Also, I am doubtful about your ideas to strengthen some areas with your own research. We prefer secondary sources and the risk with your own research is that you are not neutral and the research gets undue weight. But apart from that, please be bold and have a good editing experience! Lova Falk talk 17:47, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Class project

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Kinesthetic learning. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081205043419/http://www.lsda.org.uk/files/PDF/1543.pdf to http://www.lsda.org.uk/files/PDF/1543.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:58, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Are Experiential learning and Kinesthetic learning the same thing by different names? If not maybe the difference should be explained in the article, if so the articles should be merge? Jonpatterns (talk) 16:36, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: No, they're definitely not the same thing.  There can and often is overlap between the two ways of describing a particular learning situation or experience but you can absolutely have one occur without the other.  ElKevbo (talk) 16:51, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: What are the differences? Jonpatterns (talk) 18:51, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: As I understand them, kinesthetic solely focuses on physical movement.  Experiential is much broader and may not have any specific focus on physical movement. ElKevbo (talk) 19:24, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Experiential learning vs Kinesthetic learning