Talk:Philatelic investment

message: This article really needs to be broken up into sections so a TOC can be generated for it.  It'll make the article much more accessible/useful.  I'd do it, but I'm out of my element with this article. —
Frecklefoot 18:07, 7 Aug 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: "Table of contents" (see TOC :-) ).  A recent software update autogenerates them if you use the "== ==" syntax for at least four sections.  You can see one in United States for example. Stan 19:28, 11 Aug 2003 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sections 

message: Perhaps this article should be rolled into a section on the Stamp Collecting article.  The information seems obscure and unnecessary.
--Ironcorona (talk) 13:48, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unnecessary Article 

message: This is lacking citations, references and sources, and was mainly written by a stamp dealer in the days when providing verifiable reliable sources was not such a big thing. While much of the prose may be ok and not just a historical viewpoint, it needs significant citations to support the prose; preferably at least one citation per paragraph. Who can help? ww2censor (talk) 15:34, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations

message: It seems Stanley Gibbons Investment Indices are not available now.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by St220 (talk • contribs) 13:11, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: What is this? ww2censor (talk) 18:22, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stanley Gibbons Investment Indices 

message: The newly created Financial philately article is covering the same field. AllyD (talk) 12:07, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: *IMO it doesn't merit even a redirect since it's a made-up term that no one would be searching for anyway. Google shows no evidence of its use, and the creator of the article said as much as that he is trying to draw attention to this and other terms he has coined. Largoplazo (talk) 18:22, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Financial philately]] 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 10 external links on Philatelic investment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5oAjhl7N6?url=http://www.ftadviser.com/InvestmentAdviser/Investments/AssetClass/AlternativeInvestments/Features/article/20100118/308fc0ce-fea4-11de-a148-00144f2af8e8/Highlight-Investing-in-stamps.jsp to http://www.ftadviser.com/InvestmentAdviser/Investments/AssetClass/AlternativeInvestments/Features/article/20100118/308fc0ce-fea4-11de-a148-00144f2af8e8/Highlight-Investing-in-stamps.jsp
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.webcitation.org/5oAjhl7N6
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.webcitation.org/5oKfHym6e
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.webcitation.org/61rMV3WJM
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.webcitation.org/5oAlwCrJ9
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.webcitation.org/5oq8js1Rw
*Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5tLYjX3Ac?url=http://www.stampdomain.com/stamp_investment.html to http://www.stampdomain.com/stamp_investment.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.webcitation.org/5tLYjX3Ac
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130424135607/http://www.stanleygibbons.com/stanleygibbons/view/content/sg_invest_index to http://www.stanleygibbons.com/stanleygibbons/view/content/sg_invest_index
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.webcitation.org/5o9KY6xiF
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:34, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified