lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Trilby (novel)

message: Isn't this a bit breathless? "Hijinks"? "A magnificent Irish girl"? - Jmabel | Talk 08:14, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's actually on the mark. Svengali is a bit of an anti-Semitic stereotype. - Jmabel | Talk 01:41, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Breathless

message: The link to the complete text of the novel is broken.  I was looking for a replacement and was surprised to find not a single e-text anywhere.  All novels published in 1894 are in the public domain--I thought that was universal.  And if it's in the public domain, why wouldn't someone have put up a text?  It's one of the better known 1890s novels, I would think.  Could it be a trademark issue?  That seems unlikely, but it's the only thing I could think of. Nareek 02:15, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Dealt with, two complete online texts linked. - Jmabel | Talk 18:51, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Public domain? 

message: The plot summary contains massive spoilers and should not be on the page, otherwise a spoiler tag must be used.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.234.99.250 (talk) 01:45, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, but all Wikipedia articles contain spoilers and Wikipedia does not issue spoiler warnings. Rifter0x0000 (talk) 23:02, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spoilers 

message: According to the opening paragraph, "Trilby and Svengali forms only a small, though crucial, portion of the novel," which includes "the stories of two English artists and a Scottish artist," but the plot summary only mentions Trilby and Svengali. I haven't read the novel, but from the opening paragraph, this "plot summary" is very incomplete. It makes me wonder if it's actually the summary of one of the movies. —MiguelMunoz (talk) 21:55, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Internal Contradictions 
Talk:Anna Coren

message: I've removed the link to , and the copy-and-pasted text that was with it.  The whole thing seems to be based on blogger Garth Montgomery's take on the word "performer".  I think we need to see the original court argument, or at least some more sources commenting on the court argument (as opposed to commenting on Montgomery's article), before this can be put in a NPOV. FiggyBee 11:03, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Performer"
Talk:History of the tango

message: In the section "History of Tango" is written that TANGO might stem from African origins. This I put in question since in Argentina barely black people are living. It's like a lottery to see a black person there. Has someone an explanation for the African roots that seem to be logic?
--Hauke 08:18, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Please vote Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tango.info (2nd nomination). `'mikka (t) 18:48, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Tango-related article deletion

message: The etymology discussed in this article is in fact incorrect, due to the fact that there is no proven and agreed-to single root. In fact there are at least 7 possible etymological roots, any one of which - and possibly all combined - lead to the word tango as we know it today. These are: 
1. African word meaning closed space; 
2. Resemblance of the sound of a drumbeat; 
3. African word tang meaning to touch; 
4. African word tang meaning dance, drums and the place for the rituals; 
5. Spanish derivation meaning Black dances in general; 
6. Black Argentinians danced on drums that were called tangos; 
7. A derivation of the Latin word tango or Portuguese word tangere meaning to touch. 
[Reference: extensive study - non-commercial - as per the Tango Melbourne website page 'History Of Tango': http://www.tangoinfo.com.au/tango-history.html].  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.134.88.96 (talk) 01:58, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect etymology of the word TANGO 

message: Didn't music from Italy have an important early influence on the Argentinian tango? If so, why is the term "Italy" not mentioned in the current version of this article? 173.88.246.138 (talk) 05:47, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Italian influence
Talk:Race and genetics

message: I have found absolutely no corroboration to that figure in scifinder. I checked the two putative sources, but they weren't primary sources; they were from books by anthropologists.
It doesn't make sense to dissimulate about this; diversity is a positive thing that should be heralded. If you want to diminish racism, a valiant cause, focus on the inter- Vs intra- population differences, don't parrot a patently false figure.
It's also absurd from a biological standpoint; if we were to have 99.9% genetic similarity, that would anyways be a catastrophe. We already have 3x less genetic diversity with our species' LCA; this putative figure would put as at 15x less diversity.
I don't want to change an article that isn't mine, but I hope my argument is well-understood. Genetic diversity is essential for a species (ours included) survival; we should be highlighting it as a good (and necessary) thing we want MORE of, not diminishing it. IamtheStudent (talk) 09:24, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Who We Are and How We Got Here, David Reich, page 4:  Tewdar  09:50, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

text: Here's an article if you prefer:   Tewdar  09:55, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

text: If you want to argue otherwise, present some reliable sources please.  Tewdar  09:58, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

text: I mean, there's this, but it doesn't actually give us a percentage so we'd have to do some original research to get the percentage...  Tewdar  10:43, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

text: I just found a source and updated it which said 99.6-99.8%, so I included with the others and set to 99.6-99.9%, based on this source after the genome project was complete: https://www.nature.com/articles/ng1438. Captchacatcher (talk) 16:23, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding the legitimacy of the 99.9 % figure 

message: — Assignment last updated by Misosoupley (talk) 14:55, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Biology and Culture of Race
Talk:Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

message: I want to ask that is graduation is compulsary to become a CA  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:4060:296:265B:F94B:7C22:EA3D:4FCC (talk) 10:52, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: No it's not Kanishka060 (talk) 17:01, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  is graduation degree is compulsary? 

message: The Section of Examination has discussion about CRET changes expected in 2022. Though the matter has been in discussion and news the exact statements made here do not have any backing.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.161.52.90 (talk) 04:25, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes in ICAI Examination 

message: ICAI has introduced the new policy for foundation, intermediate and final examination. Kanishka060 (talk) 17:00, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  New policy introduction by ICAI 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: rajkot-icai.org/icai-motto. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Geardona (talk to me?) 14:11, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:18th Missouri Infantry Regiment

message: Your lede says 'The 18th Missouri Infantry was a United States Army unit organized during the American Civil War.' If it was organized during the war, then presumably it was not part of the small regular army, and should therefore be designated a Union army regiment, not United States Army. Valetude (talk) 13:37, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  United States Army?
Talk:Komazawa Olympic Park Stadium

message: Is this the same as :ja:駒沢オリンピック公園陸上競技場 Komazawa Olympic Park Athletic Field? Fg2 08:38, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Animation/Futurama task force

message: A discussion is taking place as to whether :Portal:Futurama is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The page will be discussed at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Futurama (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the page during the discussion, including to improve the page to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the deletion notice from the top of the page. North America1000 23:14, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomination of [[:Portal:Futurama]] for deletion 

message: Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for information on WP1.0 web tool 

message: I invite editors to join the discussion at WP:WikiProject Television to convert many inactive WikiProjects into taskforces, including this one. – sgeureka t•c 12:56, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Turn this WikiProject into a Taskforce? 

message: "The Cryonic Woman" needs your help! As it stands, the article is little more than a plot summary. Thanks for any assistance you can provide! DonIago (talk) 19:55, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Any help for The Cryonic Woman?
Talk:Helophilus pendulus

message: Helophilus means swamp-lover (from ancient greek  / Helos, « march, swamp» ;not  / Helios, « sun» ). This insect loves water... 
Some expansion ideas: there's still plenty that can be added before this article can be considered comprehensive - e.g. larval morphology, more about food, distribution (other countries) SP-KP 08:59, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Reinventing the square wheel

message: Maybe I'm showing my lack of experience with network programming, but is it really fair to describe online gaming developers as acting inappropriately by using UDP rather than TCP?  I could be wrong, but it strikes to me as being a bit presumptuous.
Typically, games use UDP because not every packet is essential, and therefore trading speed for reliability is a viable solution. 128.154.44.44 18:56, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Harewood, British Columbia

message: Hi, 
Interesting article except I need some clarification.  Harewood, I believe, is a district (and always was) attached or within the city limits of Nanaimo.  The name is commonly used to describe a district located approxiamtely south of Comox/Bowen road to 10th Avenue (in Nanaimo).   It at one time may have been a separate corporate entity from Nanaimo but today is part of the city.    I'm not so sure it is a "ghost town".  
Last that I saw, is also very much still in existence and occupied by residents.  
(the lake and plains that you decribed is/are correct).
Cheers, Wikipedia_V.I. 09:33, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Interjecting here because it's to your post I'm responding, albeit from last July it seems.  Ghost towns are not just completely empty towns; Yale is a ghost town but still has a few hundred residents, likewise Bralorne or Wells or Hedley, and there's places like Sandon or Ocean Falls that maybe have a few dozen.  They're both ghost towns and unincorporated settlements; or in some cases such as Harewood (part of Nanaimo now, right?  Like Wellington, also technically a ghost town though also a Nanaimo neighbourhood) they're part of other incorporations, or like Greenwood they may still be an incorporation, or like Lillooet have acquired it since the boomtime; next-to-dead qualifies, as it were.  See below about this also havin been a company town (I think?)Skookum1 23:37, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Harewood a Ghost Town 

message: This article in its current state seems obviously written by someone who's writing only from the modern context; Harewood has IIRC an important forestry and labour history role and yes, is a ghost town; it was also AFAIK a company town, that is to say, company-run like Ocean Falls or Bralorne or Fraser Mills, British Columbia (formerly a village with the Crown Zellerbach CEO as mayor, with 50 voters, all company staff; now part of Coquitlam).  Hopefully other BC editors, esp. those from the Island will notice this edit and the problems with the article and be able to address it; I know I won't have time.Skookum1 23:33, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Also a [[Company town]]
Talk:Martha Cooper

message: I just create the french article, please make the international link.
And/or tell me how to do it on my talk page. Please--Thomas Louis Jacques (talk) 10:13, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: French article

message: The 'See also' section links to Wikipedia's Street Photography article but it seems unlikely to me that Martha Cooper should be considered a street photographer. Lopifalko (talk) 13:08, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Street Photography
Talk:Liceo Italiano di Istanbul

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.liceoitaliano.net/en/pages/history.htm (predates as can be seen at http://web.archive.org/web/20051222061518/http://liceoitaliano.net/pof/storia.htm). Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  VernoWhitney (talk) 21:58, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Brabham BT44

message: I've had a stab at a template for racing cars (see template:Racing car) to summarise the usual data. I've used the F1 templates as a starting point and applied it to the Brabham BT46 article. If anyone's got an interest in this, please have a look at the template and modify or suggest changes as appropriate. After a few people have had a go at it and we have something we're happy with we could start to use it more widely. Note that it's not meant to be specific to F1, by the way. Cheers. 4u1e 09:37, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Racing car template

message: Added these Results as for some reason they had not been included.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dora Domino (talk • contribs) 02:28, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: 1974 Results for John Watson in the Hexagon Entry
Talk:Metropass

message: It would be great to have images of the previous and current designs of the pass. I have years' worth of passes, but no scanner. --dsm iv tr 09:39, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Images

message: Effectie July 1 2006, the federal Cons (Conservatives) are offering a refund to Metropass users on their income tax claims. I don't know how to start a new section for this, maybe someone else can use the info here: http://www.toronto.ca/ttc/taxcredit.htm
69.194.35.109 14:42, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tax Refund 

message: Metro Transit in the Twin Cities area of Minnesota also has Metropasses. Would someone care to write about that?
71.193.69.15 14:54, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Metro Transit in Minnesota? 

message: That would be fantastic - perhaps make a new article, and we can turn this into a disambiguation page? dsm iv tr 07:20, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Great idea!
Talk:Brabham BT49

message: Good article on the Brabham BT49, however the information surrounding the BMW M10/12 derived turbo engine is not entirely correct.  At the end of it's development for formula 1 use, the M12 did produce approximately 1500bhp in qualifying form.  However, this level of output was not reached until 1986/7.  Those who worked on the car would be able to give more accurate figures, but my best estimate is that in 1981/2 the engine produced in the 650bhp region in race trim and perhaps 820-850bhp in qualifying.  The turbo cars of the era were significantly faster than their (mainly) Cosworth (500-540bhp) powered rivals, but the power gap was not 1000bhp in qualifying.   Posthocergopropterhoc (talk) 05:52, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Corrected, with ref. 4u1e (talk) 14:59, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Engine output

message: I've had a stab at a template for racing cars (see template:Racing car) to summarise the usual data. I've used the F1 templates as a starting point and applied it to the Brabham BT46 article. If anyone's got an interest in this, please have a look at the template and modify or suggest changes as appropriate. After a few people have had a go at it and we have something we're happy with we could start to use it more widely. Note that it's not meant to be specific to F1, by the way. Cheers. 4u1e 09:37, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Racing car template
Talk:Ferrari 248 F1

message: I've had a stab at a template for racing cars (see template:Racing car) to summarise the usual data. I've used the F1 templates as a starting point and applied it to the Brabham BT46 article. If anyone's got an interest in this, please have a look at the template and modify or suggest changes as appropriate. After a few people have had a go at it and we have something we're happy with we could start to use it more widely. Note that it's not meant to be specific to F1, by the way. Cheers. 4u1e 09:37, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Racing car template

message: This section seems to be coming from a point of view of someone who is a Ferrari fan.  I have changed it around a bit
The car has performed well this season... This sentence does not look neutral....
However in the race, Fernando Alonso still managed to salvage second place to keep his championship hopes alive  This sentence is definitely not neutral as Alonso was leading the championship at that stage!
Therefore, I think a cleanup is required. --Cyktsui 01:35, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A major cleanup, this article is supposed to be about the car, not a summary of the 2006 Formula One season! Spute 20:45, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2006 Season 

message: I've now rewritten a large part of this article, so it's about the car, but there's more to do.Spute 23:56, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  recent changes
Talk:Ferrari F2001

message: I've had a stab at a template for racing cars (see template:Racing car) to summarise the usual data. I've used the F1 templates as a starting point and applied it to the Brabham BT46 article. If anyone's got an interest in this, please have a look at the template and modify or suggest changes as appropriate. After a few people have had a go at it and we have something we're happy with we could start to use it more widely. Note that it's not meant to be specific to F1, by the way. Cheers. 4u1e 09:37, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Racing car template

message: I propose that Ferrari F2001-B be merged into this article for the following reasons:
* WP:F1 standard practice is to describe "B" versions in the main article
* this article already covers the F2001-B
* the F2001-B is a development of the F2001 which only competed in 3 races and I don't believe it requires its own article.
DH85868993 (talk) 08:37, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. It is a logical place to put it (the name clearly shows its a B-spec car) and the article is very short, so a merge shouldn't cause any issues.  SSSB (talk) 08:57, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: If there are no objections, I am going to merge these articles next weekend (assuming I remember, and no-one beats me to it).  SSSB (talk) 11:27, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge
Talk:Ferrari F2002

message: I've had a stab at a template for racing cars (see template:Racing car) to summarise the usual data. I've used the F1 templates as a starting point and applied it to the Brabham BT46 article. If anyone's got an interest in this, please have a look at the template and modify or suggest changes as appropriate. After a few people have had a go at it and we have something we're happy with we could start to use it more widely. Note that it's not meant to be specific to F1, by the way. Cheers. 4u1e 09:37, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Racing car template

message: Claim that Motor Sport magazine established this car to be the fastest F1 car of all time is uncited. On a comparison of lap times I can't see how the F2002 can be thought faster than the F2004.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.44.85.73 (talk) 21:07, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Fastest F1 car of all time

message: F1 have a minimum weight regulation that decreed that a car cannot be lighter than a certain weight. in this case, year 2002 where the regs cite that it can't be lighter than 600kg. this rules has been in place since the '70s. So, stating that F2002 is lighter than F2001 is a bit misleading since the regs on 2001 and 2002 have the same minimum weight limit.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.193.54.128 (talk) 05:48, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: In the early 2000s, many (most?) teams were capable of building cars which weighed less that the minimum weight limit, which they then brought up to the minimum weight limit using ballast (e.g. lead). I suspect the statement is meant to indicate that an unballasted F2002 weighed less than an unballasted F2001 - which was an advantage, as it gave the team more flexibility regarding the location of ballast to optimize the car's balance and handling. DH85868993 (talk) 09:14, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lighter than the F2001?