lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Spokane Shadow

message: The Shadow returned in 2013, joining the inaugural season of the Washington EPL.  They won the title for the inaugural year.  They play now at Spokane Falls CC in Spokane.  Their logo is basically the same.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.42.210.141 (talk) 20:35, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resurgence in WAEPL 

message: I just did a major overhaul of the article, reflecting the existence of the new team, of which I am a local fan. The new team is a continuation of the old one, not a completely new thing. The organization, SSC Shadow, also has a huge youth soccer program. I'll go ahead and fix some redirects now. --HGK745 (talk) 07:54, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major update
Talk:The Biggest Loser season 1

message: does anyone know how they got the weight loss percentage? For Example When I started losing weight I weighed 174 pounds now I weigh 122. Can anyone tell me my weight percentage, fat percentage and how you got the number?
: Your weight loss percentage would be (174 - 122)/174 is decimal, multiply by 100 to get the percent. Plastikspork (talk)
:: 29.89%  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.16.160.101 (talk) 20:18, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Percentage

message: Can someone please add the height info and BMI info? 75.89.235.158 (talk) 00:10, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: We just need a WP:RS for the height and the BMI is easy. Plastikspork (talk) 20:44, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: BMI

message: Someone really ought to add the airdate to each episode. -ErinHowarth (talk) 18:56, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Airdates
Talk:Fort Pitt Provincial Park

message: There is a choice between using Infobox Military Structure and Template:Infobox Protected area Kind Regards SriMesh | talk 04:42, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox
Talk:Catherine Kousmine

message: Katherine Kousmine may be a nutritional pioneer in some types and principles of orthomolecular medicine, her nutritional work may precede others, although scientific priority (discovery, use, description, etc) especially in some omniscient international sense is always tricky business.  Semantically, she is not "the founder" of orthomolecular medicine. That recognition simply belongs to Mssrs. Pauling and Hoffer who gave name, principle, definition and organization to "orthomolecular" in the 60s and 70s even though current orthomolecular type therapies long preceded the development of orthomolecular medicine as coherent body, at least as early as the 30s in vitamins, and perhaps the turn of the 20th century with various substances as well as studies in metabolism.  
Skimming through Google, I don't see Hoffer, Pauling or  JOM editor Saul make any direct mention of her.  The other concern is that I see her name associated with homeopathic and naturopathic sites and honors, so I have concerns  about confusion of her medical and nutritional practices as being (mis)interpreted as canonical to "orthomolecular", too.  The Orthomolecular statements about Dr. Kousmine need WP:V WP:RS references where references in English may be problematic.
My preferred approach is this: let's work on her Wikipedia entry here, first.--TheNautilus 01:27, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: re: orthomed

message: Answer to the previous comment. Wikipedia is not known for its objectivity. It belongs to the system. 
My English is automatic translation, courtesy of Google
--Estelamargentina12 (talk) 20:22, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  You can't get blood from a turnip 
Talk:Bath Township, Greene County, Ohio

message: Please see :Image:Map of Greene County Ohio With Municipal and Township Labels.PNG: there is no village of Byron listed.  This may be an unincorporated community, but why list a redlink?  This is not the way it's done for other Ohio townships.  Nyttend 15:51, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Byron, Ohio is in Bath Township.Brian0324 16:05, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Byron 
Talk:Carrot River, Saskatchewan

message: Actually, as of the last national census (2006) the population is 941. This sign however has not been updated and still states 1200.  Dnirvine (talk) 07:12, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  /* Population */ 
Talk:Pivot chart

message: This article is devoid of any information.
Agree. It would be usefull to include a list of software that have such funcionality other than MS Office (if any).. [OT]bdw, these fundrising ads in wikipedia are a little bit exagerated..[/OT]   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.81.227.247 (talk) 05:58, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Useless 

message: This article could use a visual example. QuinnHK 16:00, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image
Talk:Glenn L. Pace

message: The Eyring and Pace articles list each other as a "see also," but I can't figure out why.  Eyring's article shows nothing about the satanic ritual investigations or anything else here. Are they related? If so, I think the better solution would be to mention it in this article (but probably not Eyring's unless he is notably related to Pace; I imagine it would be the other way around). Cool Hand Luke 04:41, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't see any connection either, so I removed the cross-links. — Val42 05:32, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Henry B. Eyring?

message: Why in the world was this page moved to Glenn Leroy Pace? In all the sources, he's almost always referred to as "Glenn L. Pace". I see no reason to move to the full name, as that name is almost never used in the sources except when stating what his full name is. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:33, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I must have missed the move, but I agree with you that it shouldn't of happened. Thanks for correcting it.--StormRider 14:34, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move : Why? 
Talk:Primitive Church of Jesus Christ (Bickertonite)

message: I've put the notability tag back up here and it will stay until notability has been met.  As of now I don't think 1 cited source and 3 references amounting to 4-5 small paragraphs worth of information is notable.  Notability guidlines say that "a topic is presumed to be notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" and I don't think what is included proves significant coverage.  This does not mean that this article cannot be notable but as of right now it does not display meet notability guidelines.
However I would be in favor of merging the 2 schismatic articles into a broader article such as Schisms (The Church of Jesus Christ) that could include both church's and more information.  I think it would be better to do that since there seems to be a link between the 1907 and 1914 groups.  JRN 16:07, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If you're so concerned with notability, start an AFD—let editors decide rather than just yourself.:If you're so concerned with notability, start an AFD—let editors decide rather than just yourself. You're interpreting the word "signficant" in the guideline in a way that confirms your pre-existing biases (if any). Generally, 4 reliable sources satisfy the notability requirement. If you don't think so—start the AFD. Rich Uncle Skeleton (talk) 22:29, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

text: If you are right and the article is not notable, then the logical solution is to include the information at The Church of Jesus Christ. You seemed opposed to that when I first suggested it, which is why I made the separate article. You can't have it both ways, my friend. :) Rich Uncle Skeleton (talk) 22:33, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I never opposed including the information.  Get your facts straight and stop making assumptions.  A WP:CIVIL tone might help you out also. JRN 18:39, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes and you do very well taking it out context to try and make me look bad.  I was referring to the uproar and accusations of "glossing over" because those were not covered, even though the history didn't include that time period.  I never was opposed to additions of that information but was responding to accusations made against other edidotrs and I.  Again please be WP:CIVIL.  This is your second warning.  JRN 14:49, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: I've added the template {Template:Citation needed}, which from your original edit summaries seemed to be your concern and what you were getting at. The article has sources to establish notability, but there are no specific footnotes yet for most of the individual sentences. Rich Uncle Skeleton (talk) 23:22, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations tag
Talk:River Cauvery

message: I propose merging this article with Kaveri River article.
"Cauvery" is just an alternate spelling used for the more common spelling "Kaveri". From the topic perspective, both the articles talk about the same entity, the river. This article will have to be redirected to Kaveri River after the merge. - KNM  Talk 16:17, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Since there is no opposition, I am going ahead and merging this article with Kaveri River. Thanks, - KNM  Talk 16:18, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Marriage Guidance Counsellor

message: Given the results of the article's recent AfD, would anyone object if I merged content to And Now for Something Completely Different, given that this appeared to be the most popular preference? ╟─TreasuryTag►sundries─╢ 20:13, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging
Talk:Dominion Enterprises

message: Added the "linkfarm" tag to the section of links which looks like a huge advertisement. Wperdue (talk) 00:10, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  links 

message: I searched several article databases and was unable to come up with any reliable sources giving significant coverage on this company.  Since this is a subsidiary of a larger company, I've suggested that any pertinent info be merged into the parent company's article at Landmark Media Enterprises. --Darkwind (talk) 01:10, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Good idea. --BwB (talk) 11:19, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability check
Talk:Stomil Olsztyn S.A.

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: consensus to move page to OKS Stomil Olsztyn. After evaluation of arguments from both sides there is a consensus to move page to the new title   Megan☺️ Talk to the monster 20:38, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Stomil Olsztyn (football) →  – Appears to be official name per club crest and based on discussion on WikiProject Football Talk. RedPatchBoy (talk) 21:46, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

text: Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. RedPatchBoy (talk) 21:47, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Comment That's why I put OKS Stomil Olsztyn instead of Olsztyński Klub Sportowy Stomil Olsztyn, and the same standard as SL Benfica, FC Porto, Sporting CP, FC Barcelona, Manchester City FC, etc RedPatchBoy (talk) 00:25, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

text:   Govvy (talk) 18:15, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 22 September 2020 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: No consensus to move. (non-admin closure)  Steel1943 (talk) 04:54, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: OKS Stomil Olsztyn →  – the adopted nomenclature of articles relating to clubs in Poland (for example, it is Lech Poznań, not KKS Lech Poznań). Atlantico 000 (talk) 14:00, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

text: This is a contested technical request (permalink). GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 18:25, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 10 March 2022 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Nominator is blocked due to sock. (non-admin closure)  Hhkohh (talk) 03:41, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: OKS Stomil Olsztyn →  – Appears to be official name per contact's official website "Stomil Olsztyn S.A.", and the name "OKS" is out-of-date from 2014 Consiiiid (talk) 08:57, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 21 April 2022
Talk:List of districts in the London Borough of Croydon

message: This article could do with a map showing the location of all the districts of Croydon.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.195.196.140 (talk) 09:49, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:1967 Stanley Cup Finals

message: As of 2011, this is Toronto's most recent Stanley Cup championship, most recent appearance in the championship final, and with the Chicago Blackhawks ending a 49-year Cup drought with their victory in the 2010 Stanley Cup Finals, is the longest-active championship drought in the NHL.
This statement seems inaccurate to me, because technically speaking, a team is the Stanley Cup champion until the next team is crowned.  In this case, the Maple Leafs were still considered champions until Montreal was crowned in 1968.  That would make the longest drought belong to the Los Angeles Kings and St. Louis Blues  who joined the league while the Maple Leafs were still officially champions.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.163.134.123 (talk) 03:04, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stanley Cup Drought 

message: Al Smith's name appears on the list of players whose names were engraved on the cup, but the text immediately below the list says that his name was left off the Cup. I don't know which is right, but one of those must be wrong. 159.2.43.167 (talk) 16:56, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stanley Cup engraving section
Category talk:Physiologists by nationality

message: The list of English physiologists - at any rate by contrast with the list of German physiologists - is a bit thin and omits Hodgkin and Huxley as well as Joseph Barcroft even though all have entries on Wikipedia elsewhere and could be cross referenced.  I would expect the current president of the International Union of Physiological Sciences to be able to verify a comprehensive list of the most important physiologists for all countries on application.  
 (Wolbeakie 16:44, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Elvis Presley phenomenon

message: Not sure what year these stats were taken from but they seem very unimpressive. I mean 41% of people having danced to an Elvis record? The figure must be higher than that. Sounds like nonsense to me! Cls14 (talk) 09:46, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Stats from American Demographic Magazine

message: One of the sections says "Elvis Lives?"
Then it carries on with "Many fans", I mean who are the many fans? What number constitutes as "Many"
So yep.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by NZAlex (talk • contribs) 13:07, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a lot of really questionable verbiage in this article. It's definitely not written like a good encyclopedia article. 168.12.253.66 (talk) 20:48, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weasel words? 

message: This is a pretty good article, but: in what sense does it cover a different topic from Cultural impact of Elvis Presley? (The first line of this article even begins 'The Elvis Presley phenomenon refers to the important cultural and social impact of Elvis Presley...'). The only real difference seems to be that Cultural impact of Elvis Presley is about the impact of Elvis during his life, and this one is about his lasting significance after his death. Perhaps the articles should be either merged, or renamed to reflect that. Robofish (talk) 03:19, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible candidate for a merge?
Talk:Python Night – 30 Years of Monty Python

message: I'm not sure I understand this sentence?   "The documentary ends with Palin trying to recreate the first It's man appearance by walking into the water,.............".
Does 'It's man' need to be in quotes? Neils51 (talk) 22:02, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meaning? 

message: Haking online kyu 223.227.79.206 (talk) 09:10, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sj
Talk:Tyler Stone (Marvel Comics)

message: The article has two references. This new warning makes no sense. Lots42 (talk) 20:34, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the problem is that they are not in citation format, so they got missed.  I'll fix that. 204.153.84.10 (talk) 21:54, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What? 

message: http://www.marvunapp.com/list/app2099.htm This can be used to find good Tyler info. He has been all over the 2099 universe. Heck, the entire rest of the website is great for references. Lots42 (talk) 17:09, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Helpful link for later
Talk:Authenticité (Zaire)

message: As stated, personal names had to be authentic - foreign names were banned. The interesting thing was the development of "ex-names" - an almost underground movement. During the two years I spent in Shaba (once and again Katanga), everyone had an ex-name, even those born after the authenticity campaign was put into effect. Mail for my students would be addressed "Ilunga Mpanga (ex-Werner)", or "Kabedi Kapinga (ex-Yvette)". Among friends the ex-names were used as one might use a nickname, though never on formal occasions. I was amused to note the extension in a few cases of ex-names to geographical features.
The geographical authenticity campaign was done in a fanatical manner. Not only did major towns and cities receive "authentic names": Stanleyville became Kisangani; Luluabourg, Kananga; Jadotville, Likasi; Baudouinville, Moba; Cocquihatville, Mbandaka; and so on. Even minor placenames. But there were a few features that did not have authentic names - or one could not be found or agreed on. In late 1984, a couple of months before I left Zaire, I was in the Zone Commissioner's office for the Haut-Lomami Sous-Région, in Kamina, and while awaiting my turn to see the gentleman, noted a brand new official large scale map of Zaire covering much of one wall. Being a map freak, I pored over it. Some 150km west of where I lived was a low range of hills formerly known as "Les Monts Hakonssen". Apparently no authentic name had been found in the 11 years since authenticity was mandated, and since it was illegal for them to bear a foreign name, this official map labelled them "Les Monts ex-Hakonssen"!  Ptilinopus (talk) 13:18, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renaming
Talk:Anonymity network

message: Although this page has little information, it gives a basic overview for users who may not know what they are. I think it should stay, or at the very least, marked as a stub. MasterXC 17:06, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Marking something as a stub does not preclude it from being speedy deleted. Stubs are not meant to exist as such permanently, either. This subject merits nothing more than a brief section at the article Proxy server. If you wish to merge and redirect to that, I will agree.
By the way, please sign all your messages with ~~~~ so that other editors don't have to seach through their revision history pages to see who left a message. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 17:13, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

text: I was just about to suggest the redirect to proxy server. That seems the right thing to do here, as I don't think there's enough to merit a separate article. --Bfigura (talk) 17:13, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy Deletion Talk Page
Talk:Sackets Harbor, New York

message: I added material to show the historic military significance of Sackets Harbor during the War of 1812 and the 19th c. Americans don't think of the northern border as being an area as much in dispute as it was. Some historians tend to classify the War of 1812 as a continuation or another episode of the Revolutionary War. The village had significance beyond its current small population and status as destination for heritage tourism. --Parkwells 17:11, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure about all that, but developing the linked NRHP historic district article, which itself has link to NRHP nomination document (usually a v. good source), would help.  Some of that development could then be summarized in this article. --doncram (talk) 13:39, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Significance of Sackets Harbor in 19th c. 

message: It seems strange for a tourist destination to have no photos. If you are going there can you take some to illustrate this article?  filceolaire (talk) 13:19, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos
Talk:1999 Montreal Expos season

message: :The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
moved --Philip Baird Shearer (talk) 14:09, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Support, as nominator.  Skeezix1000 (talk) 13:28, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

text: Any additional comments:
* Move completed --Maxim(talk) 02:10, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Support, as nominator.  Skeezix1000 (talk) 13:28, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: :Any additional comments:
* Move completed --Maxim(talk) 02:10, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Talk:SQL Server Compact

message: Link to French article pointed to MSDE article. MSDE and SQL Server Compact aren't the same thing. So I changed it to the Compact section in the Microsoft Sql Server article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ruijoel (talk • contribs) 15:58, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  correcting Link to French article 

message: There is SQL Server Compact 4.0
It doesn't fit below the introduction if this article, because it isn't available for Winodws CE.
--Ikar.us (talk) 19:40, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  4.0 
Talk:Cold Gin

message: I propose a deletion of this page since there is a page for Kiss song Cold Gin. Zrinschchuck  —Preceding undated comment added 15:34, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

message: "Cold Gin" does not appear on that list at all. I'd delete it from the article, but I don't know how to delete the reference.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.103.86.213 (talk) 03:56, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  AskMen Top 10 list