Talk:Margaret Haig Thomas, 2nd Viscountess Rhondda

message: This article has been tagged as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement.  It will likely be deleted after one week unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Major contributions by contributors who have been verified to have violated copyright in multiple articles may be presumptively deleted in accordance with Wikipedia:Copyright violations. 
In this case, it can be verified that copy was taken from one source. The article says:
The source says:
The article said:
The source said:
Other material, too, seems to follow closely on that source.
Due to current problems with the internet archives, I am unable to see the other source to determine if content is also copied from or closely paraphrased from it.
Interested contributors are invited to help clarify the copyright status of this material or rewriting the article in original language at the temporary page linked from the article's face. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 21:16, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:58, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: the infobox lists mackworth as her birth name. the text says she married a mackworth in 1908. are they both correct; i.e. did she marry a cousin? clarification is called for.Toyokuni3 (talk) 22:41, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Maiden vs. married name

message: >Less than a month after Lady Rhondda's death in 1958, women entered the Lords for the first time thanks to the Life Peerages Act 1958; five years later, with the passage of the Peerage Act 1963, hereditary peeresses were also allowed to enter the Lords.
What is the difference between "women" entering the House of Lords for the first time in 1958, and "hereditary peeressess" entering in 1963?  Thank you. Rissa, copy editor (talk) 06:51, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The difference is that from 1958 women with life peerages could sit in the Lords but those who had inherited hereditary peerages did not inherit the right to sit until the 1963 Act. So Lady Rhondda would not have been automatically eligible to sit in the Lords if she'd lived a few months longer. (Women with hereditary peerages could, however, be granted a life peerage as well. Irene Curzon, 2nd Baroness Ravensdale seems to have been the only such case.) Timrollpickering 11:44, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Perhaps also ironic that, given a life peerage, the 2nd Baroness Ravensdale would have sat in the House of Lords and would have been addressed by her more senior hereditary title. This is a convention also for those with Irish peerages who are able to sit in the House of Lords courtesy of either a life peerage or a hereditary peerage from the other peerage systems within the island of Great Britain.Ds1994 (talk) 21:46, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peeress 

message: I check pages listed in :Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of :Margaret Mackworth, 2nd Viscountess Rhondda's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "ReferenceA":
From David Lloyd George: 
From Somerville College, Oxford: http://blogs.some.ox.ac.uk/jcr//
From D. A. Thomas: South Wales Daily News, 4 July 1918
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 03:58, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphaned references in [[:Margaret Mackworth, 2nd Viscountess Rhondda]]