lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ministry to Persons with a Homosexual Inclination

message: I removed "However, most Roman Catholics are against same-sex couples being able to adopt which is considered a form of discrimination" since it really had no logical place in the document. Whoever added that should make a section on criticism, and then write it using sources. With that statement there, one might as well say "Catholics are hypocrites". —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bjford (talk • contribs) 03:38, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hey, I'd just like to remind you of WP:NOOB.  Their effort was made in good faith, and actually even if it's out of place, they are correct: from ; "Cardinal Alfonso López Trujillo, Vatican head of the Pontifical Council for the Family, told Fides news service in May that allowing same sex couples to adopt children, “would destroy the child’s future, it would be an act of moral violence against the child.”"  Also, Catholic adoption agencies have threatened to close in the UK, based on their unwillingness to allow gay couples to adopt: .  I agree that a section on criticism might be useful.  Joie de Vivre 16:40, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'm sorry if it seemed like I was attacking-- I wasn't. I was just correcting an error. I know very well it is true, but the location of the statement and the way it was worded was not appropriate. --Bjford 19:12, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed part about Catholic Church and adoption. 

message: The article on this topic should perhaps discuss allegations that many of the Roman Catholic clerics involved in ministry to homosexual persons were themselves homosexual. Some of these claims assert that they often abused their ministry in order to have illicit homosexual sex, sometimes even with minors, in what amounts to a significant chapter in the pedophile priest scandal. ADM (talk) 06:24, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Clerical sex scandal
Talk:International Gay Rugby

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://web.archive.org/web/20050310185537/http://www.igrab.net/about.php. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:01, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Oratory (speaking)

message: Oratory is also a type of Roman Catholic church. "As a general term, Oratory signifies a place of prayer, but technically it means a structure other than a parish church, set aside by ecclesiastical authority for prayer and the celebration of Mass."  From the public domain 1911 edition of the Catholic Encyclopedia.  http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/11271a.htm
A link should be made to this definition of Oratory.
MinnRay (talk) 12:59, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional Definition

message: I've suggested that Orator be moved into this page as there is very little to separate the actor from the act.  Moreover, the Orator article isn't very good. Nofrak 14:31, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oratory vs. Public Speaking 

message: Someone who is familiar with the history of the subject, please meld the criticism section into the main history section and add more detailed information. At the moment it does seem rather cursory..Andycjp (talk) 03:52, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, a rewrite is needed.  And in doing so, the decision of whether or not to merge the article into public speaking should be more evident.  I looked at this criticism section, and I honestly tried to merge it.  However in doing so, it is evident that the section is pure WP:OR and is presented as critism of the facts stated in the article, not in classification of oratory itself. I'm removing it. -Verdatum (talk) 21:20, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite?
Talk:Marcus Storch

message: If Hillel Storch was the chairman of the Swedish branch of the World Jewish Congress, it is remarkably unlikely that his wife was non-Jewish.  Why do we need a reference that she was Jewish?--Runcorn 23:24, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If Marcus Storch should be classified as Jewish then it must be clerified that his mother was so, see the article Who is a Jew?. /Slarre 01:41, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:AN/SPG-59

message: DANFS notes that USS Norton Sound (AVM-1) was the testbed for the Typhon Weapon Control System (which has to mean the AN/SPG-59). This image and this image seem to show the radar system, a massive addition to the ship above the bridge. The images have to be public domain since they must have been shot by USN personnel, though it doesn't seem wise to upload the images without checking first. The Norton Sound was later used to test Aegis and the AN/SPY-1 system and well as the Mark-86 gun fire control system with the AN/SPQ-9, both systems still used today and shown in the pictures in wikipedia's Norton Sound article.. --Dual Freq 23:25, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Norton Sound

message: 1. Typhon Weapons Control System; 2. AN/SPG-59 Radar; 3. RIM-50 Typhon Missile Extended Range, also called Super-Talos; 4. RIM-55 Typhon Missile Medium Range, also called Super-Tartar; 5. Mk13 Guided Missile Launching System; 6. Canceled in 1963; 7. Restructured into program that later becomes the Aegis weapons control system.
--Two way time (talk) 04:28, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Some Details

message: I put sections in to the document to make it more structured. I also removed the SCANFAR reference because I am certain that SCANFAR was unrelated to Typhon. --Two way time (talk) 06:20, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sections
Template talk:Medieval Philosophy

message: Why is Gemistus Pletho in this list? It should be clearly classified as a renaissance philosopher. --Meldor (talk) 21:34, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Same problem with Bessarion and Francisco de Vitoria. --Meldor (talk) 21:37, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

message: Hi, everyone, I just made a big change to this template. I sincerely want to do this b/c an alphabetical name-list is by no means navigable; in fact it is the most ILLEGIBLE thing. ---Cf. this discussion. If anyone could help me with the chronology of Islamic philosophers, that would be really great!
:sorry for the short words; I'm just too busy during the semester.. -- SzMithrandir (talk) 00:29, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edits
Talk:College Girls

message: I started this article with information I've found on a few newspaper websites. Channel 4's mini-site for the series had an episode guide and probably other helpful information, but it's not online any more. Episode info (and all other contributions!) would be helpful additions.Jimbow25 23:30, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Started article

message: The link to the story in the Telegraph seems to no longer be correct. I think this article:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1409358/Oxford-girls-in-Channel-4-series-angered-by-cuts.html
is the same version, but I am unsure. It has the same publication date and source, but a different headline. In the next days I will check if it contains all the information referenced in the article. If it does, and there are not objections, I would like to add it (replacing the current link?) to the reference section. --Computermacgyver (talk) 13:47, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved Reference Page 
Talk:The Bird That Drinks Tears

message: Please watch out your spellings, grammar and typos when you are editing. I know that most of people who are editing here speak English as second language, me being one of them, but it wouldn't hurt to at lease attempt to watch out for grammar and spelling problems. Tinned Butterfly 22:25, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Spellings and grammars.
Talk:Prince Mirko of Montenegro

message: I've started the (long overdue) Prince Mirko article, it's currently in its skeletal stage. If anyone can add to the article (make it more informative), please do. GoodDay 23:45, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Created
Talk:Hypnophobia

message: Why is this page re-directed to Clinophobia? They are not the same!!!!
124.185.144.56 23:54, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: February 2007

message: your should add some percentages of how many people have this phobia.
--Talltay21 (talk)
Karley 2010's sentences are good. Well-written and lots of credible sources. Calvinsimmons87 (talk) 21:14, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Critically Evaluating 

message: Isn't hypnophobia the fear of sleeping while hypnotized and somniphobia is just the fear of sleep?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.119.50.105 (talk) 18:36, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hypnophobia & Somniphobia 
Talk:Eisenhower Middle School (Wyckoff)

message: Ok I just found the Wiki entry for EMS. Because immature students believe this site to be only for fun and vandalism (see recent vandal history), should I add this to my watchlist to help against the vandalism that seems to plague my school's page? I just want this page to be more successful than other middle schools. Does the page need other information to give it a more info for any person who feels the need to look up my school? Thanks. AloysiusR 00:55, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Read–write conflict

message: I propose that the previous edit, "Removed redundant link", should be reverted, because the link to write-read conflict was not redundant. Rather, it is useful to point out that read-write conflict is different from write-read conflict. 24.18.112.168 00:04, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have just done this. I have made the "See also" section consistent accross the 3 pages for Read-Write, Write-Read and Write-Write conflicts. Egriffin 12:30, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Richard March Hoe

message: Hoe's presses were not "lithographic". They used printing plates. High speed lithography for newspaper printing came much later. --John Nagle (talk) 18:50, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not "lithographic" 

message: @Johnpacklambert I'm curious about Special:Diff/1218577249.  The category seems appropriate to me. RoySmith (talk) 15:29, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category:American people of English descent
Talk:LGBT+ Labour

message: The list of candidates does not really fit in here - at the moment, the only association with LGBT Labour is "a list of people they might give money to" and won't really stand the test of time. It feels as if this should be trimmed to just particularly notable candidates (Who will be few and far between, per WP:POLITICIAN) or those somehow linked to LGBT Labour. WP:LISTPEOPLE is also relevant, although applies more to standalone lists and is the reason I don't want to spin this out into it's own "LGBT candidates in the General Election 2015" article. ~Excesses~ (talk) 13:50, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lists of candidates 
Talk:Thighpaulsandra

message: This article says his real name is unknown. A previous edit of Spiritualized considers his real name to be sufficiently well known to actually pipe the link! (Tim Lewis). One article must be wrong. --kingboyk 00:10, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not 100% sure what you are saying, but if you are suggesting moving the page to 'Tim Lewis', this isnt what he releases his material as and it is not what he is best known as. --AlexOvShaolin 19:23, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: i think he's saying "it's incorrect to say his real name is unknown". ._. tomasz. 21:39, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Contradiction

message: No sources, no notability for a standalone article. In ictu oculi (talk) 19:06, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge 'Daterape'
Talk:John Jones, Talysarn

message: Thank you for adding the stub. While many great Welshmen in this period, most notably poets, took a moniker which often indicated their locality, I do not think John Jones was one of these. He was known as "John Jones, Talysarn" simply to distinguish him from other John Joneses, not as "John Jones (Talysarn)" which would indicate that he could be referred to by the moniker alone. D22 00:09, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, he certainly could be referred to simply as "Talysarn", and people would know who you meant.  But it's the normal wikipedia convention to use the brackets to differentiate people of the same name, and I think it's right to do it here. Deb 12:42, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for the explanation D22 18:13, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening heading
Talk:1900s in Western fashion

message: The Period is from 1900-1910... Shirley was born in 1928 and started her career in '32-34... meaning the Edwardian era was years BEFORE her time... I'm going to delete it, because it's not correct.--189.170.64.143 (talk) 02:51, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Shirley Temple

message: What are "warm egg climates"?  Should "egg" be deleted?  Bill the Cat 7 (talk) 20:26, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm going to delete it.  Please add back in if I'm in error.  Bill the Cat 7 (talk) 05:45, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lingerie Dresses 
Talk:Freddy Kreuger (song)

message: If anyone has a better picture of the single cover, feel free to put it up - this is the best I could find on the Internet Chipstick 15:34, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

message: I imagine someone may have pointed this out but...Freddy Kreuger is supposed to be spelled Freddy Krueger. DoctorFuManchu (talk) 11:09, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misspelled
Talk:Levene's test

message: The poor English makes this almost unreadable.  Please address to make this article useful.
-----------------  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.63.39.82 (talk) 15:31, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

message: If I read the article right, if my results turns out to .02 for example, something is "wrong"? Ie. statistically significant? Is that correct? --194.255.112.22 21:38, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Under 0.05? 

message: I may be wrong, but isn't levenes test performed using a one way anova of the absolute residual values - not squared residuals?  Sureley this will make a huge difference to the final p value.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.95.32.127 (talk) 04:48, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jason Crowthers example 

message: The text suggests that the test statistic W follows an F-distribution, although nowhere any assumption of normality has been made. So I guess W is only approximately F-distributed. Madyno (talk) 17:51, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distribution 

message: As the current article says, testing for homogeneity of variance first and using its results to determine whether to use the Student's t or the Welch-Satterthwaite modified t test will change the alpha from what the researcher selected. As demonstrated by Zimmerman (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15171807/), the preferred approach now is to 1) not determine the test used based on an initial test for equal variances but also 2) to always use Welch's t test. You lose very little power, since in the case of equal variances Welch's t test reduces to the original Student's t, but in all cases Welch's test preserves the researchers selected alpha. I will change this article to reflect that. SteveOuellette (talk) 15:32, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The current preference is to just use Welch's test
Talk:Moving to Blackwater

message: It seems likely to me that the engineering credit to "Mitty" refers to Miti Adhikari, who worked at Maida Vale for decades. I don't know how to easily confirm this, though. 81.110.180.57 (talk) 15:51, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Mitty" at Maida Vale 

message: Wikipedia should not have trivia - all of the information in the article should be non-trivial, that is, important enough that it was written about in independent reliable sources such as concert and album reviews, features in newspapers and magazines written by journalists, edited books, etc. Any material that fits this description should be moved out of the trivia section and the source cited; the rest should be removed.—Anne Delong (talk) 22:26, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia - there shouldn't be any
Talk:Return address

message: Didn't early FORTRAN compilers support even some form of tail-call recursion?...
See Talk:Fortran#Recursion for discussion of recursion in Fortran.
--DavidCary (talk) 16:26, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fortran and recursion 

message: Hindi 2405:201:4014:8B80:9153:1011:F8CD:33DF (talk) 13:58, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tropic of cancer
Talk:Global Ideas Bank

message: i see no references, where are the references?
18-Oct-2013: the site is down and looks rather dead. http://www.globalideasbank.org/ Perhaps give it a bit of time to revive but sadly this cool resource looks like it's gone.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Missbossy (talk • contribs) 05:46, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Freehold High School

message: Springsteen never graduated from high school so how is he an alumnus
He graduated although he didn't attend the ceremony, therefore he is an alumni X0summerhunni 00:11, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Luby transform code

message: LT code are Forward error correction codes, there is no mention of this in the article!
In "Why use an LT code?" we can read that rateless code are the solution for the transmission
over an erasure channel with no feedback channel. Rateless codes are not the only solution to this problem.
Any Forward Error Correction code can do the job (with an appropriate code rate with regard to
the loss probability of the channel).
--Cunchem 13:09, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Forward Error Correction code

message: I read this article three times, and I still can't really get the flavor of LT codes out of it. I think it needs a major rewrite.
From reading other literature, it appears that LT codes depend entirely on the Exclusive OR operation, or bitwise addition with no carry out of any bit position. I intend to rewrite the description of LT codes to make this clear to a typical Wiki reader. Probably tomorrow.  DavidCBryant 00:44, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: This article doesn't make sense

message: M. Luby. Information additive code generator and decoder for communication system. U.S. Patent #6,373,406. Issued April 16, 2002. (continuntion to #6,307,487).
This patent seems to describe LT codes. Digital Fountain now have the patent rights for the aforementioned patent. Digital Fountain also have a patent on Raptor codes. Raptor codes use LT codes after encoding with a systematic code, such as Hamming or LDPC codes. For patent infringement to occur, all claims listed in the patent must be replicated in a commercial service or product. Does anyone want to correct these statements? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 137.215.9.20 (talk) 08:26, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Patent issues
Talk:Stock paintball

message: There is also no mention of auto-triggers. In strict stock class, these are not allowed, but because the Phantom has one it is generally accepted.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.188.82.72 (talk) 07:21, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I guess we decided to nix most of this list?  There are many manufacturers who modify existing markers to conform to stock class regulations rather than create purpose-built stock guns from scratch.  Do these manufacturers not deserve mention?  More importantly, given the brief nature of this article in the first place, are we sure that we want to be removing information at this point?  Would it not be better to simply write out everything we possibly can and then, when we feel all the possible information is present, go about whittling it down to a consumable size? TrojanMan
(moved from an HTML-comment within the article to here on Jan 19, 2008 by mhi as a cleanup-measure)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.244.188.53 (talk) 13:38, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of modern manufacturers 

message: This article has no decent reliable sources, and I don't think it is suitably jusitifed having it's own separate article.  Let's just mention it over at Paintball variations in a paragraph or two (with sources).  Jwoodger (talk) 04:24, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge to Paintball
Talk:Ion (paintball marker)

message: Okay, I went a little nuts, but I now feel confident in removing the POV template.  I think the "operation" section needs work, but it doesn't have to proceed under the POV header.  A quick straw poll is in order.  Jouster  (whisper) 03:21, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *Support removing the POV template: our work here, POV-wise, is done. Jouster  (whisper) 03:21, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Awesome work, everyone.  Thanks to all who contributed.  If someone with more experience with Ions wants to mess with the "operation" section a bit, that'd be great, but I'm thrilled to have been a part of a process to de-POV an article that proceeded so quickly and with so little acrimony.  Congratulations to us all!  Jouster  (whisper) 18:42, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Just for S&G, here's the diff from start to finish.  Jouster  (whisper) 18:47, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: POVcheck. again.
Talk:Jack Bailey (actor)

message: We don't have a cause of death mentioned in this article. His bouts of alcoholism may have contributed.  At times, during Queen for a Day, he slurred his words, gestured lethargically, leaned precariously close to the contestants and babbled almost unintelligibly during the interview segments. Overall, in spite of the rigged applause meter and Bailey's brash showmanship, he was popular with the women, of course, since he had convinced Ex-Lax, Hartz Mountain, Amana, Westinghouse and other major manufacturers of the time to contribute cash, services or products to the winner's daily take.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.92.8.189 (talk) 18:02, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cause of Death
Talk:Cherry (Yui song)

message: *:Che.R.Ry → :CHE.R.RY —(Discuss)— Capitalisation - song is officially titled and released as "CHE.R.RY" —Lily1104 (talk) 08:19, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move
Talk:Return period

message: I'm currently researching wind return period.  I'm no expert so I leave it for others to remain open when writing.Mbubel 16:00, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  return period is used for more than for floods 

message: USGS - Return Period (recurrence interval) Calculation Examples & Refs needed dond (talk) 16:18, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Both USGS & FEMA use Return Period Calculations Refs needed. 

message: Can someone please add such a section? Thank you. Imagine Reason (talk) 12:49, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Variance of the return period 

message: I won't my order is returned 2409:4088:CE42:393A:0:0:7E0A:7614 (talk) 10:43, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  I won't my order is return