lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hobor

message: This is a real place in Inner Mongolia and the site of a battle in the Japanese/Inner Mongolian invasion of Suiyuan Province in 1936.
according to Guo Rugui Honggeertu 红格尔图 is Suiyuan's Taolinxian 陶林县 or Tao-lin-hsien
Taolinxian is now Hobor, Inner Mongolia, China according to 
http://www.fallingrain.com/world/CH/20/Hobor.htmlAsiaticus (talk) 14:24, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This info was based on a misreading of Guo Rugui. 红格尔图 is part of 陶林 county, but 80 km east of the county's administrative center. removed Yaan (talk) 14:44, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Phil Mulloy

message: What is the point of the navbox at the bottom ? Without links, it does not seem to serve the usual purposes of such boxes (cf http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Navigation_templates ) - and they are normally intended to be placed on separate template pages. -- Beardo (talk) 21:59, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Navbox 
Talk:Zee Cine Award for Best Actor – Female

message: I think someone has put Alia's name wrongly inspite of Anushka Sharma.I myself have voted for her!!!!  Ceremonials (talk) 20:28, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anushka is original winner  

message: wikipedia page owner please check yrf officinal twitter Handel , Zee studio officinal twitter Handel, Emmay Entertainment page they all says bst actress in popular is Rani mukerji not kiara advani. please check again. 2405:205:C94A:630E:9488:D4BA:1DB0:597B (talk) 16:07, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The twitter account for the awards indicates that the winner is someone called Advani Kiara. Perhaps if you have a source that says different you could provide a link to it? ---- D'n'B-t -- 18:18, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zee Cine Award for Best Actor – Female wrong information
Talk:Tim Noble and Sue Webster

message: At least one major contributor to this article appears to have a close personal or professional connection to the topic, and thus to have a conflict of interest. Conflict-of-interest editors are strongly discouraged from editing the article directly, but are always welcome to propose changes on the talk page (i.e., here). You can attract the attention of other editors by putting  (exactly so, with the curly parentheses) at the beginning of your request, or by clicking the link on the lowest yellow notice above. Requests that are not supported by independent reliable sources are unlikely to be accepted. 
Please also note that our Terms of Use state that "you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation." An editor who contributes as part of his or her paid employment is required to disclose that fact.  Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:49, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict of interest 
Category talk:Environmental sciences awards

message: * Propose deleting this; the only category was meteorology which I have now placed in more specific categories. To include "climatology" would bring it up to "atmospheric sciences". If we need the category at some point we can recreate; I would suggest recreating to treat "awards" and "competitions" separately. --Lquilter (talk) 14:58, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Shock

message: I added a link to Wheel chock, because a reader looking for that isn't unlikely to come here. It got removed because "his has nothing to do with the shocks described here". I agree, it hasn't (and one might argue that Detroit Shock and others haven't either), but it still helps the reader (who might not even know what shock and chock are). For a similar case, note how Heart links to Hart, and vice versa, even though they have nothing to do with eachother. I'd like us to form consensus on this, so please comment. —Bromskloss (talk) 14:46, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  A link to ''wheel chock'' is relevant 

message: Should we have an article for the generic chemical shock, used in decontaminating pools? Elfred (talk) 20:16, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pool shock 

message: I am making the table of contents as initially collapsed.  Aceing_Winter_Snows_Harsh_Cold (talk) 04:44, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  It just looks a bit wierd that one has to scroll down just to see the things.
Category talk:Copyright activists

message: Shouldn't people who started downloading sites (oink, piratebay and so on) and people who are members of the pirate party be in this category too? //moralist 14:47, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Activism is usually considered to be political action. Members of the Pirate party, because it advances political positions, would be appropriate, I think. I don't know enough about the people who started downloading sites -- oink, piratebay, etc. -- to say whether they did it as a form of activism out of a principled disagreement with the current state of copyright law, or whether they did it to make money (which is what I had always assumed). If the latter, then I think they would form a poor fit with the rest of the folks in the ":Category:Activists" tree. --Lquilter (talk) 15:18, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Should creators of download sites be added?
Talk:VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland

message: I am trying to write an article about a govermental, non-profit research institute... Can you explain me why do you see this
as "blatant advertising"? VTT is one of the biggest employers in Finland and I suppose its deserves to be featured in Wikipedia. Companies of the same size are also feature here... I really don't understand?
: Sure, VTT definitely deserves an article. It's just the way the article is written that makes it look very much like advertising material. Compare to for instance http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fraunhofer_Society . Also, having inline non-wikified references to Taloustutkimus surbeys with no web links is not really good style here.TorLillqvist (talk) 16:56, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Anyway, much of the text in the article seems to be directly copied from VTT's own web pages, like http://www.vtt.fi/vtt/index.jsp?lang=en . If that isn't marketing material, I don't know what is... TorLillqvist (talk) 17:06, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

message: Why does VTT redir here and not to VTT (disambiguation)?--88.73.41.59 (talk) 14:04, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  disambig? 

message: I think there should be a section listing some of the technology developed by VTT.
What do you reckon?
Azylber (talk) 13:29, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  technology developed by VTT 

message: I've removed a lot of content that were sourced with VTT's own sources only. I also removed these two as I think the sources are not typical media sources used on Wikipedia. But see for yourself and put them back if you disagree. Cheers, Jjanhone (talk) 18:51, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed content 

message: In April 2021  Wimvdam added a warning tag on this article. This is what has happened since that. At the time the article contained mainly VTT internal references. Yesterday I added translated texts from Finnish Wikipedia and now there are dozens of good quality references used. Can you please check if the warning is still needed? Cheers! Jjanhone (talk) 11:00, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you!Jjanhone (talk) 12:20, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Written like an ad?
Category talk:Ancient wine

message: I think this cat would be better served if it is renamed to something :Category:Wine of the Ancient World, that way it would be more appropriate to have historically overview articles in the cat like Ancient Rome and wine, etc. AgneCheese/Wine 05:11, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, the usual set-up would be :Category:Wine of the Ancient World, a topic category, with a list subcat :Category:Wines of the Ancient World to include actual drinks, such as Retsina and any others described as 'X is a wine'. The second would be a subcat of :Category:Beverages, the first would not (as a historical overview is manifestly not a beverage). This would be a routine matter anywhere else in Wikipedia. (There is :Category:History of wine.) Occuli (talk) 14:42, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename idea
Talk:Lin Chen

message: Is "Prof. Chen" really a professor?
He did not invent the first three factor model of the term structure of interest rates.
The article lists no peer-reviewed publications.  Why is it remarkable that Chen's out-of-print work was mentioned is some secondary surveys of the literature?!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.191.103.186 (talk) 16:24, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Nittany Furnace

message: I have reviewed this article according to the requirements of the GA criteria and have placed the article on hold until the following issues are addressed. As you address each issue, either strike through the statement/place a check mark next to the issue and state how you addressed it. If you disagree with a particular issue, state your rationale for doing so after the issue in question so a compromise can be reached.
#"The preliminaries to its construction..." Be specific and state "to the furnace's construction" when starting this section as it will flow better. (added "the furnace's") GaryColemanFan (talk) 06:15, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: First, my profound thanks to GaryColemanFan for fixing a number of style issues. With regards to images, the one presently included is the only published image of Nittany Furnace that I know of. It would be very difficult to find others. I will look for relevant external links. Choess (talk) 14:23, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Review: On Hold

message: Good job with addressing the above issues and adding the new external links. Also, great job on adding the new image, I was just going to recommend adding a picture of steel or charcoal. Anyway, I have passed this article according to the requirements of the GA criteria. I made a few minor corrections concerning spacing/inline citations and noted them above. Continue to improve the article, making sure that all new information is properly sourced and neutral.
Also, to anyone that is reading this review, please consider reviewing an article or two at WP:GAN to help with the very large backlog. Instructions can be found here. Each new reviewer that helps to review articles will help to reduce the time that articles wait to be reviewed. If you are new to reviewing and want to familiar yourself with the process, study the GA criteria, look at other editors' reviews, and leave any questions you have at Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations if you need feedback while performing a review.
Keep up the good work, and I hope that you continue to bring articles up to Good Article status. If anyone disagrees with this review, an alternate opinion can be sought at Good article reassessment. If you have any further questions about this review, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 23:56, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: GA passed

message: See also: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Metalworking#Project scope.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 10:35, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Query
Talk:Ukkusiksalik National Park/rough translation from deWP

message: * Nunavut Handbook, Iqaluit 2004 ISBN 0-9736754-0-3
* Walk, Ansgar: Der Polarbär kam spät abends – Skizzen von der Wager Bay, Pendragon Verlag Bielefeld, 2002 ISBN 3-934872-22-0 (German) [“The Polar Bear Came Late at Night: Sketches of Wager Bay”; there is no English edition of the book.]
Coordinates: 65°-66°30' N, 87°-93° W
----
Translated deWP article as of 2007-12-21. -- WeHaWoe (talk) 13:05, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Books
Talk:Leyla Pınar

message: The section entitled "Press Review" was an apparent copyright violation, duplicating content found at this link. I have removed the section. If material from this interview is to be added back into the article, please do so without copying the source verbatim, as that constitutes a violation of Wikipedia's policies. Thank you. ZZ  Claims ~ Evidence  15:14, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Also removed other sections of text, including most of the main body, due to extensive copyright vios as indicated in the edit summaries.  Seicer (talk) (contribs) 16:01, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

text: Continued copyright vios from this web-site from various IP socks and accounts are not tolerated. Please cease the pointless insertions. If you wish to contribute regarding the person, please write and cite the materials per WP:CITE. Enough warnings and notices have been given out about this already.  Seicer (talk) (contribs) 06:09, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright violations

message: Why is this hidden away with Leyla Pinar a redlink?  Gene Nygaard (talk) 11:48, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: All content is taken from the English-language biography found here: http://www.istanbulbarok.com/. Jarvislunt (talk) 00:00, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I just discovered this. It seems the article had been reduced to stub several times before, with the creator and a series of IPs repeatedly re-adding the copy-vio material. Obviously, they re-added it again. I have now reduced this back to a stub and removed the copyvio material pasted in from http://www.istanbulbarok.com/eng/leylapinar.htm Let's hope it sticks this time. The article's subject is notable, by the way. Voceditenore (talk) 14:49, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article should be deleted 

message: I've added some references to the article, including a feature article on Leyla Pınar  in Hürriyet, one of the main newspapers in Turkey an another one about her and her ensemble  in Milliyet, another major Turkish newspaper. I don't believe the notability tag applies anymore. Voceditenore (talk) 08:52, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Lietava Castle

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that the featured picture :File:Lietavský hrad-východná strana.jpg, which is used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for August 12, 2020. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2020-08-12. Any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be made before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:15, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Lietavský hrad-východná strana.jpg]] scheduled for POTD
Talk:Šariš Castle

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://vmek.uz.ua/00000/00060/html/090/pc009031.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  KylieTastic (talk) 12:01, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Grassalkovich Palace

message: I see that there is a dispute about naming on this article.  Please discuss things at the talkpage, or bring things up at User talk:Elonka/Hungarian-Slovakian experiment.  Thanks, Elonka 15:33, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: What convention/guideline applies to buildings? According to Markussep's comment:OK. Since Wikipedia:Naming conventions (architecture) is inactive, WP:NCGN is the next best thing for buildings. "group of people that used to inhabit the area" would refer to a larger area than the building itself of course. (...)Markussep Talk 11:38, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

text: So we add names to the lead of buildings based on WP:NCGN? Squash Racket (talk) 18:54, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Naming
Talk:Domica Cave

message: Hi! i think the article should be moved to Domica Cave. ATBWikirictor (talk) 10:11, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Move
Talk:WS-ReliableMessaging

message: where is ws-rm of aug06 in the history section?
Can someone tell what is the need for WS-RM in practice, as practically TCP/IP is the only transport protocol used to carry SOAP messages, and it guarantees exactly once delivery and also maintains order.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Out on bail2 (talk • contribs) 07:30, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
Talk:In a Lonely Place (novel)

message: Thanks to whoever wrote this page for just ruining the novel for me. I got it from the library, thought I'd do a bit of background research on here, and now there's no point in reading the damn thing, since you've given away the finale. So thanks again, guys. You're doing a bang up job. JackHeslop91 (talk) 19:11, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Thanks
Talk:McClure's

message: mandsdfgjksdhfirh  kuhihuh it was masded in 1901  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.120.11.219 (talk) 00:26, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: 1901

message: We say,
: "S. S. McClure was forced to sell the magazine to creditors in 1911. It was re-styled as a women's magazine and ran inconsistently in this format, with publication from October 1921 to February 1922, September 1924 and April 1925, and February to May 1926."
Apparently those dates refer poorly to gaps in publication.
There was a 5-month gap from Oct 1921 to Feb 1922, followed by resumption under new ownership and the return of S. S. McClure as editor in March 1922. From the 1922 volume 54 (copy from U Michigan viewed at HathiTrust) see: 
* May 1923 letter to U Michigan library  (in place of 1922 title page and index)
* March 1922 statement by the new publishers  (pp. 7-8)
* March 1922 editorial note by McClure  (pp. 9-10)
By the way, the latter begins "It is seven years since my name has appeared ...", which implies some change during 1915, probably, that we do not mention in the article.
In place of the quotation above, we may need
: "... It was re-styled as a women's magazine [... some more information about the 1910s]. After ten years it ran inconsistently, with no issues published for October 1921 to February 1922, September 1924 to April 1925, and February to May 1926."
The underlined gaps in publication are noted in the last of 5 HathiTrust "other catalog records" linked below.
Beginning 1923 the HathiTrust digital copies cannot be viewed (public domain ends 1922), so we cannot investigate the later history from the primary source. The HathiTrust catalog record after 1923 is suggestive but does not indicate precise data; probably the HathiTrust collection is incomplete.
The HathiTrust collection is almost entirely unconsolidated. Beside the copies from U Michigan and others, complete or nearly so for 1893 to 1922, there are at least five other catalog records (none after 1918), (none after 1917), (none after 1915), (none after 1915), (none after 1914).
The last three are from U California which suggests, together with the 1922 note by S. S. McClure, that U California dropped its subscriptions after SSM departed.
--P64 (talk) 18:20, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistent after 1911?
Talk:Mathias Döpfner

message: What is the relevance of this uncited claim (referring to the bit about Real Time With Bill Maher)? Are we going to list all the shows broadcast on stations owned by Time Warner? I'm not sure if Real Time is really the most notable thing that can be mentioned about Time Warner, Inc. Oktal (talk) 01:07, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Real Time With Bill Maher 

message: To add to this article: the fact that, just prior to the 2020 U.S. presidential election, Döpfner sent an email to his colleagues asking them to "pray" for former President Donald Trump to be re-elected. Source 173.88.246.138 (talk) 21:58, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: This looks to me like the kind of thing that WP:BLPGOSSIP says we should not add.  In any case, we'd need multiple high quality sources for this kind of thing, and Newsweek (per WP:RSP) is not one of them. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 08:32, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  To add to article
Talk:The Conduct of Major Maxim

message: There's a contradiction between the opening sentence ("second of his series of novels...") and the statement in the review section ("final installment in a series of novels..."), unless the series consists of two novels. In fact, this is the second of four novels featuring Harry Maxim. The link supporting the second statement is to his obituary, which supports the fact that the series was originally intended to be filmed by the BBC but says nothing about the place of this novel in the series. Frothelhorse (talk) 15:28, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Talk:Amschel Mayer Rothschild

message: long life in courtly circles where many taboo things occurred. Childless 'trysexual'? Mrphilip (talk) 18:31, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  category LGBT History? 

message: In online databases, Ann Alexander Rothschild * 8 APR 1807 London + 10 JUL 1917 Baltimore is mentioned, an alleged (and probably out-of-wedlock) daughter of Amschel Mayer von Rothschild and of Catharina Maria Weishaupt (1789-1867) and therefore granddaughter of the founder of the Illuminati order Johann Adam Weishaupt (1748-1830). Ann Alexander Rothschild is said to have married Franklin Pierce Stevens (1804-1869) and had a son Robert Stevens. Is there any value in this information, or is a conspiracy theory suggesting a joint world rule by the Rothschilds and the Illuminati?
87.150.170.231 (talk) 12:58, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alleged illegitimate daughter Ann Alexander Rothschild?
Talk:Indian wine

message: An editor (User:Hppboston) buried this comment in the article but I think it would be more appropriate here where it can be discussed. This article was referenced to the Oxford Companion to Wine and after work I will review the source and give a fuller reply about how the source presents the material. AgneCheese/Wine 16:37, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: History section

message: Why has this article had such an obviously redundant first sentence since 2007? bobrayner (talk) 11:53, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lede 

message: This article lacks any mention of wine exports, eg who are India's export markets?   How much is exported?   What are the barriers to export (is it just that production has difficulty meeting local demand)?   FreeFlow99 (talk) 11:06, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Export
Talk:List of Superfund sites in Alabama

message: Why on Earth are these two sites NOT included as superfund sites?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.209.144.16 (talk) 15:31, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Neither site is on the National Priorities List. Pelham Range was archived from the active list in 2009, and Ft McClellan Garrison in 2011. Both sites were deferred for regulation under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA) ie they are being managed at state level, not federal. Keri (talk) 17:43, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ft. McClellan and Pelham Range 

message: Check here to keep this updated Darwulf (talk) 00:27, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Helpful source to keep this updated