lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:United States Olympic Training Center

message: I have removed the following statement, added by User:70.14.110.179 on 9/13/2008, as I can find nothing online to substantiate it, or even the existence of a doctor by that name involved in Olympic training.
:"In 1982, Dr. Harley Johnson revealed to the international community of Olympic fans that 2 out of the 3 OTCs supplied illegal drugs to athletes.  The majority of these drugs greatly increased the athletes performance at the Olympic games."
If true, it should be reasonably easy to find.  If anyone can find a source on this, by all means, restore it. -- Mwanner | Talk 02:00, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed section

message: According to the Wikipedia entry on Rhonda Rousey, "She formerly trained at the Olympic Training Center in Wakefield, Massachusetts..." Is this still an active US Olympic Training Center?
:<B>☺</B> Dick Kimball (talk) 13:58, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location Question 
Talk:Bob Brookmeyer

message: The article appears to lift entire passages, word-for-word, from the New York Times obituary of Brookmeyer. I believe this is plagiarism? Does the Wikipedia style allow for actual word-for-word copying from a copyrighted source to a Wikipedia entry?
:No, it doesn't. The user who added it is no longer registered. I have changed the content: rephrasing, adding inline citations and deleting a lot. EddieHugh (talk) 13:19, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Word-for-word copying from the New York Times?

message: I simply can't believe that this is the best image that can be found for the info box! Somebody must have one at least a hundred times better of such a popular musician. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:27, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: Bob Brookmeyer partnered with Jimmy Raney (guitarist) for the album "Jimmy Raney Featuring Bob Brookmeyer" in 1956. I'm not sure how to add this info so maybe somebody can do it? Here's info on the collaborative album: https://www.discogs.com/Jimmy-Raney-Featuring-Bob-Brookmeyer-Jimmy-Raney-Featuring-Bob-Brookmeyer/release/7805315  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.140.232.129 (talk) 18:11, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add another album with Bob Brookmeyer?
Talk:Cornerstone Speech

message: This was stated before that statement in the same speech. 
""the enslavement of the African was in violation of the laws of nature; that it was wrong in principle, socially, morally, and politically. It was an evil they knew not well how to deal with"    It's not for us to judge by editing out critical context.
http://msgeorgewc.weebly.com/uploads/5/0/9/7/50973469/sources_civil_war_and_reconstruction.pdf  -- Preceding unsigned comment added by OxAO (talk  o  contribs) 09:06, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: If you read the full passage contained in the speech, he said that racial inequality was the cornerstone if the Confederacy.  The sentence you quoted referred to 18th-century views that Stephens thought were outmoded (now that "positive good" ideology had taken hold). AnonMoos (talk) 01:36, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  This statement is COMPLETELY out of context.  "the negro is not equal to the white man" in the format used on this page
Talk:Jim Byrnes (actor)

message: i have never made edits to a page before so i am placing this in talk section and hoping someone will edit the article section.
the television appearances section is missing his role in the sifi series Travelers.  season three episode seven. Thanks to whoever takes care of this matter.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.115.68.209 (talk) 23:01, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Valuation ring

message: :If V is a totally ordered group, a subgroup U of G is called an isolated subgroup of G if 0 ≤ y ≤ x and x ∈ U implies y ∈ U. The cardinality of the set of isolated subgroups of V is the height of V. If V is the trivial group, corresponding to the trivial valuation resulting from taking a field as a valuation ring, then V is of height zero.
Something is off with the counting, because the trivial group has one isolated subgroup, not zero. AxelBoldt 23:55, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. Ringspectrum (talk) 19:50, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

message: In the Definition section, the line 
  For a subring D of its field of fractions K the following are equivalent:
is awkward. My impression is they are trying to say what's more clearly phrased as
  Let D be an integral domain and K its field of fractions...
otherwise it's not clear what "its" is referring to. But I'm not confident enough that that's the intent to change it.
M.C. ArZeCh (talk) 23:47, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree and I'm not sure why this awkward wording is used here. ("field of fractions" suggests D is assumed to be an integral domain). I have there reworded it. -- Taku (talk) 00:36, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unclear language
Talk:Ben A. Jones

message: I added a table with his KY Derby record. I was going to add the Preakness and Belmont as well, but the media guides for both those races are odd, and the Belmont one doesn't even list historic trainers just modern ones. AfleetAlexsBalance (talk) 18:57, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added Kentucky Derby record
Talk:Horace A. Jones

message: I removed the following comment as someone who has considerable knowledge of thoroughbred racing but who has never heard the '58 Kentucky Derby referred as claimed, nor have I found it in any of the important racing publications. I note the editor is a great fan of Silky Sullivan and created this article as a REDIRECT to Silky Sullivan, and I indeed saw this race and others, but the facts of his success in the Triple Crown speak for themselves. Handicapper 23:48, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Nihonjoe

message: Thanks to each of you who voiced your opinion on my RfA (even those who voted to oppose it). I appreciate all of your comments and will do my best to live up to the responsibilities and tools I now have. I'm not big on littering everyone's talk pages with thank you notes, so this is it. Again, thank you. (^_^) ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 00:18, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Thanks

message: Am sad I got here several hours too late.  I've seen a lot of good edits from you, and was hoping I could support your rise to adminship -Aknorals 12:27, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for the belated support. (^_^) ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 17:29, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  I for one...
Talk:Seaguy

message: Is Seaguy really that much like Aquaman? Beyond a general aquatic theme, they're not that similar at all, and the suggestion in the article might therefore be a bit misleading. As Cameron Stewart himself says "The only similarity between the two characters is the synonymy of their names. Aquaman is king of Atlantis, can breathe underwater and has all aquatic life at his telepathic command. Seaguy isn't so lucky - he's just a man in a scuba suit." Kelvingreen 17:32, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good quote. I'd say add that in instead to clarify. (Emperor 19:12, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'm not sure it's needed at all; just removing the Aquaman reference would be enough, I'd guess. It's like saying Iron Man is a "Batman-like" character because they're both rich guys with gadgets. The quote is from the interview linked at the bottom of the article, btw. Kelvingreen 00:44, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Aquaman-like" 

message: I'm not sure about the reference to Seaguy being a rejection of Silver Age comics either ("Morrison has expressed on various occasions that Seaguy represents a deliberate effort to move away from conventions of the "silver age" of comics, "I had the idea to develop Seaguy into a weapon I could use to fight back against the trendy and unconvincing 'bad-ass' cynicism of current comics, most of which are produced by the most un-'bad-ass' men you can possibly imagine"."). The Silver Age is not the era of darkness and cynicism the article's author seems to think it is; he or she is perhaps thinking of the 80's and 90's, as I'm sure Morrison meant. Also, the reference is unsourced. Kelvingreen 00:48, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes on a number of occasions he has expressed opinions that he wanted to make superheroes more fun as a lot of modern incarnations are hardbitten and cynical. Its not just the 80s and 90s but continues on today. I think it also includes the idea that quite a fe people writing superheroes today actually dislike them which is a funny old state of affairs. So yes strike out Silver Age - there is no need for an interpretation really as he says it all in the quote. (Emperor 02:00, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Silver Age" 
Talk:Controlling law

message: I've put down as much information as I can with the limited research tools available to me at the moment. I'll admit up front that the article is very US-centric, as most of the information I could find dealt specifically with laws in the United States. I'm relatively certain that the concept of controlling law exists in other legal systems around the world, and would be most grateful for someone who could add information about them. Also, I'm sure there are examples of cases where controlling law was an important factor, or even Supreme Court cases that dealt specifically with the issue of controlling law. Just hope that points some people in the right directions. Consequentially 00:22, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Heinkel He 178

message: There is a descrepancy between this article and others that support the idea that the Messerschmitt 262 V1 was the first ever built turbojet aircraft. Someone should REFERENCE so that we know which to beleive.
First flight of the 262 was in 1941. Where's the problem? Greglocock 08:28, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: According to Smith & Kay's German Aircraft of the Second World War(Putnam, 1972, p. 292), The He 178 (along with the He 176) was displayed at the Berlin Air Museum, where it was destroyed in a 1943 air raid. Presumably this was the Deutsche Luftfahrt Sammlung, wrecked on the night of 22–23 November 1943.Nigel Ish (talk) 18:24, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Sarah Clarke

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 14:34, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: No need to mention that she's playing the role of a secret villain, I assume revealed just this season, on the front page.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.80.3.34 (talk) 20:25, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spoiler for Covert Affairs 

message: The following was added but then removed (which is fine):
There is now an entry for this show at IMDb () which claims that Sarah's husband Xander Berkeley is also involved; there's mention of it on Famke Janssen also.
I suppose we'll just have to watch this space.
HTH HAND —Phil | Talk 12:50, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New project? 

message: Okay where does it say online that Sarah was pregnanet with a new child and when she gave birth?
--AnneBerlyne MaKenzie :) 18:42, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Her new child 

message: The main photo must definitely be replaced by one with sufficient resolution. However, I do not know where to find one under creative commons rights. Caramelize donorz (talk) 22:14, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo
Talk:Bible John - A Forensic Meditation

message: ==Untitled==
Do we have anything more definite that can be cited? I don't think wikipedia is really the place for 'it is rumoured' comments. Mrph 22:40, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rumours about Vallely? 

message: Do we have anything more definite that can be cited? I don't think wikipedia is really the place for 'it is rumoured' comments. Mrph 22:40, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I personally found this synopsis-proof, being hard to write up objectively without over-detail. Any thoughts on whether the lead and other sections cover the basic content adequately, or does anyone want a go at writing one? BoomboxTestarossa (talk) 16:53, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite
Talk:Darrell S. Cole

message: :GA review (see here for criteria)
#It is reasonably well written.
#:a (prose):  b (MoS): 
#:: 
#It is factually accurate and verifiable.
#:a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
#:: 
#It is broad in its coverage.
#:a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
#:: 
#It follows the neutral point of view policy.
#:Fair representation without bias: 
#:: 
#It is stable.
#:No edit wars etc.: 
#:: 
#It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
#:a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
#:: 
#Overall: 
#:Pass/Fail: 
#:: </div>
#:: </div>
I'm very sorry, but I am going to have to fail this article. For one, there is a very large lack of references, and the format just isn't appealing. (All caps, large mass of text). Fix the problems, and then renominate. Cheers, ṜέđṃάяķvюĨїήīṣŢ  Drop me a line§ 03:36, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: (criteria 2) I don't agree with this, the references are valid and the information is noted with inline citations.  If there are areas missing please let me know what they are and I will fix them.--Kumioko (talk) 17:10, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  But you need to specific and tell us which section uses which reference. Simply dumping a list of references at the end of the article without citing which facts are obtained from which reference doesn't help at all. OhanaUnitedTalk page 19:15, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

text: (critera 3) I need to know what its missing here, the fact is he was young when he died and without adding unnecessary fluff to the article their isn't anything missing in my opinion.--Kumioko (talk) 17:10, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

text: (criteria 6b) There isn't a problem here either, this is only recommended for GA articles AND the sources are US Government and not subject to copyright.--Kumioko (talk) 17:10, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I agree the images are fine, and the lack of inlines is not the main problem: the GA process has an unfortunate history of focussing on them. The real issue is the quality of the sources, in this case independent verifiability from a reliable secondary source. See my comments at the reassessment discussion. Geometry guy 12:50, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: GA-Fail

message: He attacked 5 enemy positions. After returning to his line twice to get more grenades and a handgun. 2600:6C40:1300:6F86:606D:730:3FAF:2BBE (talk) 09:57, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Darrell Cole
Talk:Bert Convy

message: Watching What's My Line, airing on GSN on 2 Aug 2006. The contestant's line is a shop with "Items for left handed people," and it is revealed that Bert is left-handed (and could not cut a piece of paper correctly with scissors as of that day). Copyright on the episode is 1969, after the end of the World Series; the mystery guest is Phil Rizzuto; and the panel is Soupy Sales, Sheila McRae, Bert and Arlene Francis. Usable as a source? —C.Fred (talk) 02:40, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A source of what? That he's left handed? I think general non-inflamitory statements like that don't necessarily even need a citation, but that would certainly do as one (he himself saying it). I saw the episode too. TheHYPO 22:41, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: While it's great to source everything, I would agree that it is more important to stick to published, reliable sources when asserting that someone is gay, an alcoholic, a spouse abuser, or something like that than it is that they are/were left-handed.  Didn't that come out on Win, Lose, or Draw at some point as well? Rlquall 16:23, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lefty? 

message: Looks like the image ConvyErhard.jpg has disappeared.  Removing the reference thereto unless someone else can find it.
Jcronen1 (talk) 18:32, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  ConvyErhard.jpg? 

message: Should it be mentioned that Convy had a bad habit of accidentally revealing the Puzzles on Super Password? --TheHande (talk) 19:35, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Puzzles
Wikipedia talk:Files for discussion/Archive

message: Stuff in this log's subpages, do we delete it from the list if it's done? -- ∞Dbroadwell 00:31, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I'm going to start some housecleaning, starting at the oldest and moving forward in time ... I'll be verbose in the logs. I'm cleaning IFD logs. -- ∞Dbroadwell 01:09, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

text: I'm pausing on the deletion and relisting ...vfdshljhgfdvchjhgfvdcxsacdvfghjkijuhgfdsfghjkl;lkjhgfhjklo;ppoiuhygtfrdfghjkl;pokijuhygtfyhujikl;lkjhgfhjkl;'lkjhghjkl;'lkjhgjkl;.lkjhgfghjkl;kjhgfghghgythjentyfvress765kd6txi76x6643 njhyutcyl,utkyhgtghjhwjheemzadjBSAIHHSFRESDQASEXCJHBDSJAjwewqjr.qwj q kosher yes? -- ∞Wirelain 00:30, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this talk page is not very well-watched. Maybe you should ask at Wikipedia talk:Images and media for deletion. Kusma (討論) 01:50, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Housecleaning

message: Explain archives that are blanked? —Centrx→talk • 06:51, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The blanked archives are to keep the discussions of our image deletions from being continually spidered by search engines. This has caused problems in the past and forced a blanking policy. -- ∞Wirelain 10:52, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Blanked archives

message: Is there any way to search these archives? Robert K S 19:44, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Google? Search for site-specific results. Plasticup T/C 17:04, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Searching

message: 212.47.133.106 (talk) 20:48, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. JTP (talk • contribs) 20:52, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 31 March 2020 

message: Mr. Jones was appointed chairman for me 196.206.126.103 (talk) 15:02, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. --TheImaCow (talk) 15:15, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 3 June 2020
Talk:Régis Debray

message: Shouldn't we add someting about the controversy over Rigobera Menchu's autobiography? Interlingua 00:36, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rigorberta Menchu 

message: What about the documentary SACRIFICE (Who betrayed Che Guevara?) of Erik Gandini and Tarik Saleh?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.232.93.241 (talk) 11:41, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Documentary 
Talk:Age of Pirates: Caribbean Tales

message: The way the game is "intended" to be played is a pretty subjective statement.  The supermod includes a whole bunch of aesthetic changes to the game that is unnecessary, and frankly, in poor taste.  For example, Beatrice's hair in the game is changed from a fairly dark shade of red to an almost neon yellow, despite the fact that all the portraits of her in the game have her as a redhead.  The portraits themselves have also been changed for no discernable reason, and there doesn't appear to be a way to change them back without doing a complete reinstall.
The mod also adds some gameplay changes that aren't terribly balanced and creates several problems of their own.  For example, your ship now magically teleports into the harbor wheneever you sneak into a town.  Presumably this is so people don't just sneak in and out without ever coming into range of the fort.  However, this makes completing missions in hostile towns if not overly difficult, then at least very time-consuming as it takes a very long time to sail out of the harbor in order to exit to the world map.  It's also not terribly realistic (why wouldn't the fort just fire while you were docked?)
Based on these concerns, I don't think the mod should be given a blanket recommendation by this article.  Regardless of whether or not it is a good overall mod, it should not be labeled as an upgrade or a substitute for the official patches until a modular version that allows players to choose which changes to be included in the game is released.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.69.75.87 (talk) 19:26, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I doubt this really has a place here, but... this game is terrible - I don't mean the bugs etc., I'm refering to it's realation to Sea Dogs. How could they let such a good game die like this? I would have thought they had learnt this lesson from the so called 'Pirates of the Carribean' sequal, but no, they've just gone and released another buggy, silly and just plain under developed game that has just lost my faith in modern games. This series definetly is'nt the only example (take a look at the new 'Driver' or Red Alert games). Sure the classics had choppy graphics, but what happend to the interesting and well writen stories or the uniqueness of each game? Today it just seems like game designers have run out of ideas and are just sucking the life out of 'the good old games' to impress this new generation of graphics whore gamers. 90.210.53.170 (talk) 14:49, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sea Dogs? 

message: The game's been digitally released at GOG.com under the name "Sea Dogs: Caribbean Tales". This might be worth mentioning in the article, particularly since the game is now known under a different title.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jacobg830 (talk • contribs) 12:55, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Digital re-release and re-brand
Talk:Third Stream

message: Is the Loussier trio stuff Third Stream?--Light current 00:42, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

message: For similar reasons as why "New Wave" is "New Wave", I've returned "Third stream" to the initial "Third Stream". Qwerty (talk) 06:05, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Third Stream/Third stream
Talk:Agrammatism

message: This article claims that agrammatism is linked with jargon aphasia, which is news to me.  As I understood it, jargon was much more common in syndromes like Wernicke's aphasia, whereas agrammatism usually refers to cases like Broca's aphasia.  The reference provided describes a patient with jargon aphasia, but doesn't seem to mention agrammatism.  Moreover, the jargon aphasia article claims that "speech is fluent and effortless with intact syntax and grammar," which is not agrammatism at all.  I'm tempted to remove the claim, but I'm by no means an expert on this topic.  Thoughts?  Masily box 00:49, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: note

message: It seems the recent contributions to this article (substantial expansion) have been made by someone from that research group. Tijfo098 (talk) 23:47, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bastiaanse et al. 

message: the header makes it look like one of the central points of agrammatism research. well, it's not and the first sentence proves it: "there is little written...". i have removed the header and moved it into the general section, which used to be the "early history" (spanning from 1887 to -probably- Chomskian UG, haha), but it may be better to actually delete the whole thing, imho. really, this article is a mess. Muflon 83 (talk) 22:50, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  agrammatism in catalan 
Talk:No. 89757

message: Here's the basic stuff. I hope you guys can improve it!
                Akarshi 00:49, 11 May 2006 (UTC)