Talk:Carl Panzram

message: Not necessarily because he was homosexual? No female victims? I find it hard to believe that statement. He obviously was a very bad person. But performing sodomy on over 1000 male persons and NOT a SINGLE recorded female victim? 97.103.81.29 (talk) 01:48, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The way the article is written, it seems like the claim is Panzram's own, taken from his autobiography. I wouldn't know as I haven't read it. PenguinJockey (talk) 07:32, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Why does he have to have raped women? I wasn't aware that there was a code of conduct in place as far as who you are required to rape.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.17.242.221 (talk) 03:38, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Super late reply.... but.... he himself says that he sodomized men because he was sodomized by four men as a teenager on a train. — -dainomite   02:00, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Rape isn't about sex. Its about power and control. He hated men more than women. Asarelah (talk) 01:56, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: He had sexual intercourse with a women early on in his life and got some kind of STD as a result. Basically that put him off, it's in the Panzram papers  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Commasavoy (talk • contribs) 22:10, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sodomy? No rape? 

message: How is turning homeless persons into hobo considered vandalism? He explicitly stated that he was raped by a group of New York Hobos, and there is a difference between hobos, tramps, bums, etc. Homeless persons is kind of vague.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.85.239.90 (talk) 16:06, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, 'hobos' is probably the more accurate word and more likely to have been the word Panzram actually used.  I'll change it back.  --CliffC (talk) 18:26, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia is good for at least one laugh every day - a bit of history:  apparently the article has said 'gang-raped by a group of hobos' ever since it was first written on October 22, 2004.  On October 17, 2007 some anon changed it to 'a group of New York hobos', without a citation or edit summary.  On September 20 of this year some sensitive soul changed it to 'a group of homeless people in New York'.  I'll take out the 'New York' reference.  --CliffC (talk) 20:13, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Raped by hobos

message: Given as 1891 in Killer: A Journal of Murder (novel), purportedly by Panzram himself (the book mixes his own words with those of the authors), but as 1892 in this page, evidently in Panzram's own hand. I haven't read the book in a several years; maybe this discrepancy is addressed therein. I'm guessing he simply didn't know his own birth year, due to his limited education and rough upbringing by poor and probably even less educated immigrant parents, who he describes as "ignorant." He describes himself as "too dumb to learn anything," but his handwriting is legible and spelling decent if imperfect, so he evidently leaned something in the time he attended school. One might expect him to know his own birth year. Anyway, it's a minor puzzle that I thought was worth mentioning. Perhaps a more authoritative source will appear.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.105.246.237 (talk) 03:21, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth year 

message: This is a very well written article apart from one odd sentence in the lead, i.e.:
"In graphic detail, Panzram confesses to 21 murderes (22 after confession), and a over 1,000 sodomy's on male humans."
I kind of get the gist of it... but it sounds like it has been written by someone whose grasp of English isn't so great. Could someone who knows exactly what they mean rewrite?  88.111.128.18 (talk) 23:43, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Strange Sentence

message: In Carl Panzram: The Spirit of Hatred and Revenge (2011) it was stated that during an escape attempt, Carl Panzram injured his spine and broke his legs and was given no medical attention for these injuries. This seems like important information, because this would have caused him a lot of physical pain for the remainder of his life.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.61.40.188 (talk) 01:24, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Injury during escape attept 

message: The remark about wishing "the entire human race had one neck, and he had his hands around it" is actually a quotation. Panzram may not have been aware of its origins, but it was originally attributed (in Suetonius' "Lives of the Caesars") to the Roman Emperor Caligula ("Would that the Roman people had but one neck!"). It shows up, much later, in Oscar Wilde's play "Vera; or, The Nihilists" (1880), where it is paraphrased and attributed to the Czar of Russia (in the play, the line is: "I would to God that this people had but one neck that I might strangle them"). --- Peterravn (talk) 00:31, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "One neck" quotation 

message: He raped over 1,000 men---all political correctness aside, shouldn't he be categorized as gay/LGBT?Dozzzzzzzzzing off (talk) 00:24, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: No. Why should he? I also removed the lgbr cat. Regards, Hermodhr (talk) 10:14, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe he could be categorized as gay, although this is a little bit beside the point. Most serial killers attack prostitutes (male and female), homeless folks, little kids, vulnerable person. It goes beyond sexuality, these are target of opportunity. And Panzram was surrounded with mostly men, be it in jail or as a hobo. In africa he went after under-aged girls for some reasons (he had the opportunity). Commasavoy (talk) 22:18, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

text: Asking for it on this entry is to ask it on every entry containing repeated or exclusive sodomy and/or male on male rape. Strangely (or not should you live in a cave) such requests are absent from nearly every page on correctional facilities where male inmates claim rape, abuse and sodomy by male guards. Such as each and every facility Carl Panzram was sent to. 73.188.142.252 (talk) 13:01, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gay? 

message: Date of birth says June 28, 1891. The first date in date apprehended says 1899, which would make him 8-9 years old. Early life says "First sign of criminal activity occurred when he was 12". I am going to correct the first date apprehended. 95.45.113.179 (talk) 21:17, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I would suggest consulting the sources rather than using the dates already in the article for this. - - MrBill3 (talk) 22:01, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect Dates 

message: Besides the acessory killing of Minto and his last killing of Warnke, Panzram murders that can be confirmed are:
George Henry McMahon in MAss in 1922; Carl Panzram; a "John Doe" in Conn in 1923Carl Panzram Too Evil to live part II; Alexander Lusszock and Alexander Uszacke in Philadelphia in 1923 and 1928.Carl Panzram  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.102.156.37 (talk) 14:22, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Confirmed murders

message: I am trying to find proof that he dumped his bodies near Execution Rocks Lighthouse. He was based at City Island and said, "Then I would take a rope and tie a rock on them and put them into my row boat, row out in the main channel about 1 mile and drop 'em over board. They are there yet, 10 of 'em". Looking at the maps, Stepping Stones lighthouse is much closer (about 1 mile) from City Island, whereas Execution Rocks is close to 4 miles away. Rowing 8 miles there and back from City Island in a busy channel at night seems very unlikely. It seems he never explicitly mentions Execution Rocks, and it seems much more likely it is Stepping Stones. 
https://www-rohan.sdsu.edu/nas/streaming/dept/scuastaf/collections/Panzram/Panzram-Box01Folder03.pdf 24.45.196.39 (talk) 17:07, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Execution Rocks Lighthouse 

message: Many sources have 0 backing. Some are even private blog links. Some are just links to Google or Bing search. Much of this info is based on creative writing exercises it seems. If the info is non verifiable it should be labeled as such and not as fact. 2600:1700:2054:190:3D72:85C8:2EC8:2748 (talk) 18:05, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad sources, much is alleged or just fantasy