lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice

message: This page should not be speedy deleted! I have not compared the material here with the material on RCRC's own website, so I cannot speak to whether the material here might be a violation of RCRC's ownership of that information. I write here more as a user of Wikipedia than as an editor. I would be disappointed not to find an article about this organization or any other equally notable organization. The tendency to delete speedily rather than to fix deliberately seems inconsistent with Wikipedia's mission and ideals. Sterrettc (talk) 00:21, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, I now have compared the article's text with that of the organization website. It appears that the words "was founded in 1973" may have been copied without permission. Other than that, the wording is very different and it would be hard to argue that the two are "Substantially Similar," as would be required to establish a copyright violation. I find it very unlikely that RCRC would object to the material here, or that they would pursue legal action for copyright violation, or, if they did pursue it, that they would prevail. Sterrettc (talk) 00:42, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, Okay, I see now that the version of the article I compared had already had the offending material removed. Sterrettc (talk) 00:48, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: you might want to take a look at the history section, which is advocacy. It happens to be advocacy that I entirely and enthusiastically agree with, but that doesn't make it better from our NPOV.  DGG ( talk ) 04:02, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contested deletion 

message: Started page on rev Howard moody, a historically significant pastor and leader of the church in 60s-90s. The citations on that page can provide added independent detail to this page re church’s history advancing reproductive rights + civil rights 
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/Howard_Moody Mac (talk) 13:31, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional Citations on page for rev h moody
Talk:Battleaxe (novel)

message: I pared down the summary significantly, but any additional edits are welcome Verloren Hoop 20:41, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Summary Length
Talk:Born-Alive Infants Protection Act

message: How about putting up how every senator voted, and not just Obama and Clinton? As it stands, people use this page for the shock value of "Obama supports killing babies".
:Well, Obama was the only opponent. Notice how it passed unanimously after he left? ✏✎✍✌✉✈✇✆✃✄Ⓠ‽ (talk) 21:55, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Uh hello?? Obama joined the US Senate in 2005, way after the bill was passed.  Where's your head?? LeoTrottier (talk) 02:45, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: ...It went through the Illinois senate first, with the exact same language. That was the bill Obama voted against. He voted with it in the Federal Senate, when he was no longer in liberal Chicago, and where people would actually go "What the F***?"Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 07:29, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Looks like propaganda

message: For a more balanced view of the law, there need to be citations/external links that are not only from a single pro-life organization's website. 212.179.71.70 (talk) 13:27, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: More balanced citations 

message: It might be helpful to provide a list of which senators voted for and against the Born-Alive Act.  For other Wikipedia precedents, see USA Patriot Act, the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act, and the War Powers Act.M. Frederick (talk) 14:56, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Voting Log

message: I have been doing some research about the bill, and found a similar version, but much more extensive posed to congress in 2001, what is the difference between the bills? Twhit0812 (talk) 20:28, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Difference between this and the 2001 version of the bill?

message: It seems this page is being used to suggest recent born-alive bills (and Trump's executive order) are strictly redundant virtue signalling. Can someone add an explanation of the differences? (My guess is that the BAIP Act only protects against outright murder, whereas recent bills/EO are requiring giving medical attention to the child.)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.190.236.200 (talk) 14:04, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent born-alive bills
Talk:Joseph Scheidler

message: Chicago Tribune: Defiance Pays off for Abortion Foe is a dead link
Was Scheidler ever a monk?  This book says he thought about it, but decided not to be.
http://books.google.com/books?id=Qz2c-O7-I20C&pg=PA116&lpg=PA116&dq=Joseph+Scheidler+monk&source=web&ots=00hq2mLRjb&sig=sEdEs-I-4Lo7ALx7sV26Rmb4KqI&hl=en
Theneogon (talk) 14:39, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Marise Payne

message: Please note that this page is for discussing the article about Marise Payne, not the subject of the article. If you have a pressing need to rant about the topic, please go and get yourself a blog. Rebecca 09:27, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Political legacy includes presiding over two Political scandals in her department. 1. "Robodebt" where welfare recipients had large "debts" automatically created. Royal commission into the results of this initiative currently under way. 2. Alleged rape committed in her office. This event, and the ministerial response to it, sparked massive protests across Australia against the paternal culture of Australian politics and inequality of women in Australia. 157.211.133.134 (talk) 07:28, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  presided as minister over two scandeous affairs in her department.
Category talk:Yorkshire

message: I'm not convinced the current introduction for this category is remotely helpful.  It steers readers towards articles regarding administrative divisions covering some of the Yorkshire area, not the pages about the county/region itself.  Unless someone can come up with a more neutral re-write I propose the intro is simply deleted as the administrative divisions are all covered in Yorkshire.  194.203.110.127 09:32, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Introduction
Talk:Morris Cohen (spy)

message: I'm pretty sure Morris Cohen's story is alluded to in Season 2 Episode 23 (titled "Vartius") of Madam Secretary (TV series), where a notorious Russian spy named Peter Buckley is exchanged for two American assets of personal importance to Henry. References in the show are made to the unfavorable public opinion of the exchange. Can anybody confirm this possible allusion?
Trojan16626 (talk) 06:36, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible Popular Culture reference: Madam Secretary 

message: Does anyone have information on a relationship between this person and the subject of this profile, Morris Cohen?
Removed from page:  Daniel Haworth A.K.A. Yure Saratova became an alleged communist sympathizer and supported of the Communist Party of the USSR and of America in the early 1990s. After his sudden job loss as pipe insulator and other life changes, he traveled to Russia to understand and gain support. He tried to join the Communist Party of  the United States of America in Oakland, California, but was unsuccessful due to his hard-line communist beliefs: the corrupt US government must change immediately. He was never charged with any crime involving him or anyone else. His wife Anya Saratova, birth name and whereabouts unknown was also an alleged communist sympathizer but was never charged. Haworth has proven to be a true believer in Marxist ideology and thus supports the Marxism and Engels theory.  Until such time, I recommend this add-be remain left-off.  --Aboudaqn (talk) 21:46, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Relationship to "Daniel Haworth AKA Yure Saratova"?
Talk:Lange v Australian Broadcasting Corporation

message: Currently, it says Peterswald v Bartley in the info box, is that right?  why isn't mentioned in the rest of the text? I'm a confused Kiwi here.  --Midnighttonight 09:45, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A mistake =) enochlau (talk) 09:47, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Full Case Name
Talk:Aldolase A

message: The mechanism picture is really confusing. Perhaps someone could number the steps? 129.31.72.52 19:55, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: mechanism

message: is rather gap than gad, i've never heard someone abbreviating it with gad...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.229.133.124 (talk) 08:28, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate
Talk:Thames Water

message: According to Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section, the lead section should be "an introduction to an article and a summary of its most important contents.... [and] ... Apart from basic facts, significant information should not appear in the lead if it is not covered in the remainder of the article."
The current lead includes information (its water supply and sewage metrics, Abingdon reservoir, shareholder stakes, the basis for the name [a range of rivers and boreholes in the Thames basin], for example) that is not covered in the body copy, and there is overlap between items (the Lee Tunnel is part of the Tideway project, for example).
I propose to start a rewrite of the article, so that its lead section is a summary of the key points, with the relevant citations appearing in the body, and not the lead. Paul W (talk) 19:44, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: That would be good. The current (poorly sourced) financial section should be removed / replaced as part of that rewrite. Thanks. Dormskirk (talk) 19:53, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Again, I massively object that the financial section is poorly sourced. Its sources are the official financing documents of the company, approved and verified by auditors and the financial regulator. There cannot be more reliable financial information.Jaeljojo (talk) 07:04, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: That may be your view but it is certainly not the consensus on wikipedia. Dormskirk (talk) 08:37, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: again, please name more reliable sources of financial information.Jaeljojo (talk) 08:38, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, but I cannot keep repeating myself...you need to use independent sources such as financial newspapers. Dormskirk (talk) 08:43, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Can we please escalate this to some review board? You cannot be serious to say that newspaper are more independent than auditors. Jaeljojo (talk) 08:46, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: We operate by consensus...other editors will add their views...as Paul W has already done...he is an extremely experienced editor, so please heed his comments. Dormskirk (talk) 08:48, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: You first say that the sources are not independent by your policies. Now you say you operate by consensus. Can you please give me a reason why a document that is verified by an independent auditor is more reliable by a random newspaper. Rather, can you please let me know where the newspaper gets its information from if not from the annual accounts? Jaeljojo (talk) 08:51, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see my comments above. Dormskirk (talk) 08:59, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I have completed a rewrite of the lead section, with some restructuring of the remainder of the article. As part of this (and as mentioned in the previous Talk section) I have condensed the 'financials' section incorporating both Thames financial reporting and independent reporting from sources including broadsheet newspapers and broadcasters. Paul W (talk) 14:12, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Crystal Gail Mangum

message: DELETE: This woman claims to be the victim of sexual assault and should not be named. This is common policy among (responsible) media and should be Wikipedia's policy as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FabiolaPal (talk • contribs) 
::Wikipedia is not the media and does not subscribe to the medias code of ethics.  This woman is notable, her name has been made public and she has to live with that. Batman2005 14:03, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

message: Is Wikipedia a compendium of information or an editorial comment page.  It meets all the requirements (as has done so for quite some time, but was stymied by arrogant interlopers.)  No reason whatsoever to remove other than flagrant editorial bias.
Can we please not include information about cases currently in the court system. This is highly irregular.
::This is not highly irregular, see Laci Peterson who had a page about her throughout her entire court proceeding. Batman2005 14:03, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  STRONG KEEP
Talk:21st World Scout Jamboree

message: We have to do an userbox saying something like : this users was in the 21st WSJ. --Who plays violin 17:35, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Why? --jergen 10:03, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Userbox

message: Should the song be here? Is it not a copyright violation? It seems the words are not even on the Jamboree song web site. How do we reference the words? Was the last edit, "today" to "to date", valid or vandalism? Also it seems odd to have the words here and not a Jambo (song). Perhaps Jambo (song) should be merged here. --Bduke 22:19, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Unless these questions can be answered, I'd say remove it. I've been watching it bounce around.Rlevse 22:20, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed. Please do not put it back until all these questions are resolved. --Bduke 23:07, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Official song

message: *support Chris 23:05, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: IST would be the International Service Team that was merged 29 October 2007. --—— Gadget850 (Ed) talk -  22:44, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge IST here

message: http://www.scout.org.uk/documents/jamboree/2007WSJReport.pdf --—— Gadget850 (Ed) talk -  19:57, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Final report 

message: Any closure on the thirteen missing Scouts? ---— Gadget850 (Ed) talk 13:57, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Scouts 
Talk:Ruben III

message: The link pointing to Raymond of Antioch (husband of Alice, Reuben's elder daughter) is clearly wrong, as this Raymond died some thirty years before Alice's birth.  Not being confident i am reluctant to change this; will someone else who is not nervous about editing?  Lindsay H. 10:21, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the pointer. I hope it's right now. If it isn't, be bold and correct it! Andrew Dalby 12:19, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:David Frawley

message: Critic's accusations and hatemongering has no place in wiki, any accusations David Frawley has faced should go into a subsection of controversy. GhostIn$hell (talk) 04:39, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: We tend to avoid criticism sections of WP:BLP. The criticisms are well referenced, what specifically do you object to and why? disagreeing is not enough. GimliDotNet (talk) 14:12, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Obviously, this part. See WP:CENSOR. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 14:51, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  is this response aimed at me, if so I’m not sure why? GimliDotNet (talk) 16:09, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, but the censor-part at GhostIn$hell. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 16:44, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Critic's accusations and hatemongering 

message: Guy Beck is RS, see , but I removed the word "glowingly" and a nowiki tag from the paragraph which shouldn't have been there. 122.161.190.122 (talk) 18:47, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Beck has his PhD in religion and his scholarship centers on Hindu music; he has nil academic expertise to review a book that debates AIM. And, Yoga Journal is a pop-magazine. When all critics who have published in academic journals are so harsh, we cannot choose to introduce false balance using shabby publications. TrangaBellam (talk) 19:39, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: If you had said this on your initial edit then I wouldn't be reverting you. 122.161.190.122 (talk) 20:40, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guy Beck 

message: I think the overall article is biased towards David Frawley for his more right leaning view. He did after all give evidence to his claims for indigenous versus invasionist claims and provided valid criticism towards the theory. While he may have been more selective and not done a full analysis regarding what he wrote I don't think that condones him being a pseudo-historian as people tend to call him. 108.39.84.90 (talk) 19:01, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biased review and inaccurate labeling.
Talk:Distinct (mathematics)

message: --65.102.151.208 18:06, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

message: An excellent example of why general purpose dictionaries should not be used to give definitions of mathematical terms. Distinctness in mathematics is not a numerical property. In geometry one refers to distinct points as ones which do not coincide. Maps with the same domain are distinct if they do not agree at some input. I could go on and on in this vein but I think my point is made. Mathematics is concerned with much more than just numerical properties and an all purpose term like this can not be restricted in this way. --Bill Cherowitzo  (talk) 04:59, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the reference and put the old definition back. You made your point. However the information in the article might still be incorrect. Feel free to (go on and on and) improve the article with correct information. = ] --VeniVidiVicipedia (talk) 11:01, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nonsense
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U.S. states/PPP

message: I made the table with a throw-away perl script (which I forgot to throw away). It needs to be a bit prettier, easier to edit and quicker to load but it works for this go-between project. I wish I understood this trasclusion thingie and more perl but I don't. You have to manually tell it that Georgia is the U.S state, not the Eastern European country. 
Also the table will need to indicate that the portals are linked at Portal:United States/Related portals or not. A progress bar or something for the V1.0 assesments would be nice. Only New Jersey and Wikipedia:WikiProject Michigan have actual assessments at the time of this post. The rest just link to place-holders or non-existant sections. 
Personally, I think Michigan is the most developed U.S. state WikiProject we have. See my dramatic plea for their help here.
Portal:Oklahoma, Portal:Texas, Portal:Utah, Portal:Vermont and Portal:Wisconsin all link from Portal:Browse but those states' WikiProjects have no V1.0 assessment activity at all. Wikipedia:WikiProject New Jersey has very nice assessment but no Portal:New Jersey.
Anyway, there it is if anyone thinks its useful, let me know. And this time, please, if someone is already doing this, don't leave me out in the cold! • CQ 10:29, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Intravenous drug use (recreational)

message: :. No objections.--Nsevs • Talk 14:05, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from [[Track marks]] 

message: There is a proposal, as part of the WikiProject Drug Policy, to merge and modify articles related to the injection of recreational drugs into one master article, covering skin popping, intramuscular injection, and intravenous injection. Please make comments here, and we'll wait a couple of weeks to do the merge and rewrites, as well as creating redirects where appropriate. Shamanchill (talk) 21:43, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I should probably be explicit: I support merging the Intravenous drug use article into the Drug injection article, because the former is a subset of the latter (most of the same considerations apply, the drugs and complications are similar, and people engaged in one often are engaged in the other at some point). --Scray (talk) 20:47, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Injection Merges
Talk:HD 69830

message: "HD 69830 is the first extrasolar planetary system around a Sun‐like star without any known gas giants."
I'm not sure if this statement is correct - the Lovis et al. paper suggests that the outer planet may have a core/gaseous envelope ratio close to 1, which would make it similar to Uranus or Neptune, and goes on to state "Although this ~20MEarth planet is probably not telluric, its discovery opens the way to an exciting topic in astronomy: the characterization of low-mass planets in the habitable zone of solar-type stars." - i.e. it is probably not a terrestrial.
It may be more correct to state that the system doesn't contain Jupiter- or Saturn-mass planets. Chaos syndrome 10:42, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Even then it might be a whole system of Saturns. What's the inclination on this lot? I assume there's a minimum constraint as on Gliese 581's; any less than 10 degrees and GJ 581's orbits becomes unstable. GJ 581 c-d and HD 69830 b-c are comparable in semimajor axis. -- Zimriel (talk) 05:37, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misleading statement? 
Talk:Metrazol

message: Wouldn't it be better to rename the article to Pentylenetetrazole and then refer from Metrazol to the new article? Using INN instead of trade names which are no longer is a better idea in my opinion. If no one objects I will do the transfer in the next days.
-- Panoramix303 (talk) 21:32, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Right name?
Talk:Inverse chain rule method

message: Can anyone find a general forumula for the definite integral case? Heck, we need the general formula for everything. _dk 10:44, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

message: Why not in example of int(sin(5x+4)dx) stick in 5 and divide by a fifth giving:
1/5*int(sin(5x+4))d(5x+4)
rather than guessing.
--Loodog 03:57, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm convinced that the "guessing" in there are just implicit steps and part of the mind process. Your suggestion is actually what the article was trying to get at. I guess it needs some rewording. _dk 05:31, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  so much work 

message: As a special case of integration by substitution, I believe this article belongs in the actual integration by substitution article. Hotstreets 02:00, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Request 

message: Although this method having its own page is valuable per se as many courses teach it as an individual method, it is in fact, as stated by Hotstreets, a special case of integration by substition, so it should have its own topic UNDER integration by substitution.Sebastiao 14:20, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  merger with substitution method
Talk:Pulmonary circulation

message: Merge. I haven't heard of 'pulmonary loop' -- seems to be slang to me.  Nephron  T|C 07:09, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge 

message: "feotal circulation" was a typo; i fixed the typo and the link now works. 134.84.102.244 20:17, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: changed typo

message: Right now, the history section is the biggest section in the article. I don't know if that's indicative of what's available for the topic, but I'll try to flesh this article out in the upcoming days. Resources will be added. GBFEE (talk) 20:51, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  History section
Talk:Minsk railway station

message: The correct name of the station - MINSK PASAŽYRSKI, see http://www.rw.by/en/passengers_services/railway_stations/minsk_passenger/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nieszczarda2 (talk • contribs) 23:22, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

message: Because it is causing a Checkwiki error #73: "ISBN-13 with wrong checksum", I removed the ISBN from the entry:
Минск автомобильный (Minsk Avtomobilynyj). Minsk, 2008. 
I have tried unsuccessfully to locate the correct ISBN on the Internet. Do we have the complete title? What is the name of the publisher? Who is the author? In short, we need more bibliographical information before we can find the correct ISBN. Knife-in-the-drawer (talk) 19:04, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad ISBN