lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Triumph Street Triple

message: Added as much info as I can now that triumph have officially confirmed the bike will exist.. NathanLee 00:18, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Initial add while still pre-launch 

message: As part of the Motorcycling WikiProject I am working though all the missing articles and stubs for British Bikes.  To make things easier to sort out I have created a category for British motorcycles.   Please will you add to any British motorcycle pages you find or create.  It will also help to keep things organised if you use the Template:Infobox Motorcycle or add it where it is missing.  I've linked the Category to the Commons British Motorcycles so you could help with matching pics to articles or adding the missing images to the Commons - take your camera next time you go to a rally!  Thanks  Tony (talk) 15:53, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Category for British Motorcycles 

message: Why?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.98.171.142 (talk) 23:46, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: We leave performance claims (engine output, acceleration, speed, braking, weight, fuel economy) blank unless we can specifically cite a reliable source for the number. The last time I worked my way through all the data I had for the Street Triple, I had dry weights but no wet. What is your source for this addition? --Dennis Bratland (talk) 02:03, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  No info about weight?
Talk:Clarence Mitchell Jr.

message: This article was reorganized extensively, using standard headers and introducing a more neutral, encyclopedic tone. It sounded like a personal essay about Mitchell. The Lead and article needed to provide more facts and sources to support the substance of his career achievements. Additional sources and cites have been added. Material that formerly was only in the Lead (which is supposed to be a summary) was added to appropriate places in the body of the article.Parkwells (talk) 13:45, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Reorganized, added to, and edited
Talk:McNee Ranch State Park

message: Mild Do Not Merge: Tough call, because so far, Wikipedia is very inconsistent about articles about protected areas and core physical features, at least on a state and local level. The most obvious parallels would be Mount Tamalpais and Mount Diablo. In the case of the former, Mount Tamalpais State Park has a separate article, but with the latter, the state park listing redirects to the article on Mount Diablo. With National Parks, the geographical feature and the park typically each get their own article (see Grand Canyon vs. Grand Canyon National Park and Mount Rainier vs. Mount Rainier National Park).
I tend to think that McNee Ranch should continue to have its own short article strictly about the state park, but with a predominate "See also" or "Major reference" leading to the Montara Mountain article. Peter G Werner (talk) 03:51, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to Merge with [[Montara Mountain]] 

message: McNee Ranch is not a State Park by itself. It's part of Montara State Beach. So it either should be renamed to simply McNee Ranch, or possibly better, merged with the Montara State Beach page.
(btw: this is my first talk comment, so I'm not sure of all the protocols involved.)
Elwood P. Dowd (talk) 01:06, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to Rename to McNee Ranch or merge with Montara State Beach
Talk:Jennie Kidd Trout

message: article lacks all sources.  would be particularly interested in a source for her "degrading treatment" at the University of Toronto, in order to learn more about that  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.29.61.235 (talk) 01:19, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:PEGylation

message: The old article had "both terminals". I don't think terminals is the proper form; the dictionary says terminus for singular, and either termini or terminuses for plural. I think termini is the correct form (latin?), but terminuses is also better
than terminals. I was confused reading about like terminals used in computer technology. In the long run, though, perhaps that sentence has to be extended and made longer, explaining to the visitor that the termini of the target
molecule is meant, I assume (I did not write the sentence so I don't know what the original author wanted to convey here, but I assume the author referred to the end of the target molecular that is being modified through PEGylation). 2A02:8388:1604:CA80:30D1:92B6:15A6:A5F0 (talk) 10:54, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terminus/Terminals/Termini 

message: This is a word, right? Words do not have capitals beyond the first letter, so the word is pegylation (styled PEGylation). If you're referring to a specific technical process, then perhaps it needs to be capitalized once or twice, but in general the concept is like any other scientific word, and therefore follows linguistic conventions. How do you explain capitalizing more than one conjugation of the word, PEGylation and PEGylated? I don't accept jargon or industry custom as an explanation for a non-industry encyclopedia article. The article should explain how the word came to exist, based on using polyethylene glycol (which can be abbreviated when referring to a specific substance) in a scientific process; now that the word exists, though, it does so separately from the substance that brought it into being.
And for the cherry on top, not even all of the sources for this page follow this strange pattern. 104.244.19.114 (talk) 17:27, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalization
Talk:Voriconazole

message: does anyone have any information regarding the use of voriconazole to treat coccidioidal meningitis?
75.20.216.109 00:43, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: meningitis

message: Where can you find help with the cost of this med? My Mom has just been told she has to take  this high cost med and her and my dad are on afixed income.Any suggests? help please(Winangton (talk) 19:26, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  high price 

message: Please be kind enough to let me know if this VORICONAZOLE for injection is ok to use for a 20months old baby. She is got "ALL" leiukemia.
Thanks a lot for a quick reply.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.143.41.84 (talk) 06:48, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use for baby 20 months old 

message: This could probably do with a rewrite by somebody who doesn't work for Pfizer - I have exams at the moment so I can't do it for a while, but I'll try and get back to it afterwards.  Raspatarian 17:35, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is This An Advert? 

message: Hi, I'm hoping someone is able to correct the chemical structure of Voriconazole. It currently has the wrong stereochemistry (2S,3R) where it should be (2R,3S) as described in teh IUPAC name. 5.11.2014
Jtyndall02 (talk) 23:49, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Voriconazole structure wrong
Talk:7th Field Artillery Regiment

message: Multiple times I have tried to cover the true dates and events at which my unit 1-7FA was in Iraq. The 2008-2009 deployment was partially on the Victory Base Complex/ Camp Liberty with units detached to surrounding post. Majority of that deployment was FOB Prosperity. Operation New Dawn took place from 2010 to 2011 on JSS loyalty. It is a dishonor to my brothers that lost their lives on that tour and the multiple members of my family that were injured. I gave first hand accounts that could be verified through news articles for general information. Please for the sake of the memory of my fallen Brothers fix these inaccuracies. 64.113.175.145 (talk) 06:17, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I too can vouch for this as I arrived to the unit in September 2009 right before they returned from that deployment. I actually carried their bags to their families cars meeting them there. I then deployed with 1-7 FA from November 2010 to October 2011. Furthermore, on June 06, 2011 (a date that was Hell at JSS Loyalty), we were cowardly attacked and unfortunately we lost six fathers/brothers/sons/family, and many more were injured. Yet somehow, the wiki overlords refuse to acknowledge these events and refuse to acknowledge not the sacrifices that we made, but the sacrifices that the June Sixth Six made. Why? Deplorable13Bravo (talk) 06:04, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical Inaccuracies
Talk:Senior counsel

message: Hasn't SC already been introduced in Northern Ireland due to the refusal of some Nationalist members of the "profession" declining to be known as QC?
194.46.248.151 00:47, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I the following named main petitioner in the case no MC 35/15 AND ALSO ACCUSED WITH RESPECT OF MY WIFE Dr: SANGEETA S MOOGANUR bams md presently practicing at bagalkot since she has been cooperated by me and also financially helped by me all these years since from marriage now she is unnecessarily harassing me physically and mentally she has now with power of money and men trying to by law /lawyers but since I am a very poor teacher with only source of salary and more responcibility of taking care of old aged mother and a mad sister at house /neither my wife is willing to come along with me leading a good marital life with me sir /nor allowing me to happy being alone living in a paying guest house at gadag   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.93.83.116 (talk) 09:36, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  regarding my family  court at principal senior civil judge bagalkot Karnataka
Talk:Humatrope

message: I would enjoy trying some (G.H.) I am age: 48 Male
and wonder what the proper dosage in (mg's) might be as not to cause side effects?
BenHume3@Gmail.com
---------------------------------------------------
I would also like to try this... Im a 22 year o1d male, 174 lbs, 5'8",... how may IUs, cc, or whatever do i take as a bodybuilder?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.201.112.92 (talk) 07:15, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

message: http://www.fda.gov/medwatch/SAFETY/2004/sep_PI/Humatrope_PI.pdf just go to this link it tells you the amounts u can take and not have to rely on someones sneak peak.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.88.178.70 (talk) 17:59, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Here u go all the info from the FDA is right here
Talk:HMS Dartmouth

message: I have seen no evidence from RN sources to support the assertion that BRNC is HMS Dartmouth.  All RN sources which I have found refer to BRNC Dartmouth.  I propose to revert that change, unless anyone can point us at a reliable source.  David Biddulph (talk) 17:56, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I have eventually found one reference  on the MoD website.  The term is not regularly used, but if it is officially true then I'm happy to let the page stand.  David Biddulph (talk) 18:10, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Not only was BRNC HMS Dartmouth, the name was used by the Second World War era naval base at Dartmouth. HMS Dartmouth II was a coastal forces base, HMS Dartmouth III was a training establishment. A later HMS Dartmouth was the reserve fleet's parent ship from 1945 to 1946. BRNC was HMS Dartmouth from 1953 (to free up the name for the Royal Yacht), and still carries the name, though is commonly referred to as 'Dartmouth BRNC'. See Ben Warlow's 'Shore Establishments of the Royal Navy'. Benea (talk) 05:43, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  BRNC
Talk:Vermont Route 58

message: I'm a relative local (live in Greensboro).  Not sure offhand where it may be listed on the VTrans website, but I can confirm that the segment through Hazen's Notch is indeed dirt and is closed in the winter. Ajfroggie (talk) 11:56, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hazen's Notch closure
Talk:The Diplomat

message: Ah, Fabdiplomat, that's not how things work. You can't just delete the original contents of the page and rewrite it as your own band's page. Very uncool, poor netiquette and totally against the rules. 
The right way to do this is to use a disambiguation page. I'm going to restore this to the original edit and work on a Wikipedia:disambiguation page later. Hit my talk page if you want to discuss or email me at username@gmail. Sholto.mac 01:15, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page hijack 

message: Someone deleted the Time magazine paragraph.  I feel that if this information was notable enough for inclusion in a major Australian newspaper then it is notable enough for inclusion in this article.  Is there a counterargument? Blue Rasberry 02:06, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see any reason why it shouldn't be in the article. SilverserenC 02:09, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Time magazine

message: I need some help knowing how to cite the list of contributors to the magazine. A run through The Diplomat's site will pull up all the names listed and numerous articles by each, but nowhere on the site is there a comprehensive list I could reference. Bnio (talk) 17:26, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It might not be possible to reference the list.  Some magazines may have lists of contributors, or it could be that someone somewhere has written a review of the magazine and named some or all of the regular correspondents.  It would not be appropriate to just give examples of written articles as a reference.  It is also okay to do nothing at all at present, if no reference exists.  I do not dispute the accuracy of the list and I feel that the information does belong in the article.  Blue Rasberry (talk) 18:50, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation needed on contributors list 

message: The entire page is essentially an advert for the magazine.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.250.185.20 (talk) 07:29, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reads like a promotional piece
Talk:Detroit Tigers nicknames

message: I do not think this should be merged.  The Detroit Tigers page is already quite long.  To avoid making the article unduly long, there is a "see also" section in the main Detroit Tigers page which includes links to this article and other similar articles/lists about various aspects of Detroit Tigers history.  I really think the current set up, with a single main page for Detroit Tigers information, and "see also" links to pages such as this is best.
As for sources, all of the names in this article are cross-referenced to the articles on each individual player, which include source information.  Also, each nickname is verifiable from one of the two major sources of information on MLB baseball players: baseball-reference.com and/or baseball-almanac.com
THIS IS A USEFUL PAGE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE MERGED.
The introductory paragraph is a massive run on sentence and hurts my eyes.  Also I vote not to merge as well. 198.208.251.21 (talk) 12:53, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Heterophone

message: This is all very confusing. At homonym, and also wiktionary:heterophone, "heterophone" is said to mean the same as "heteronym", namely a word with the same spelling as another but a different pronunciation (and meaning). This article says something quite different - that heterophones are words with similar pronunciations, and according to the example, possibly quite different spellings. Which is correct? Or do different people using the same word to mean different things? That wouldn't surprise me since the nomenclature of these homonym subtypes seems rife with such confusion. Matt 01:24, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

message: Are heterophones only present in English?  Most languages have much more consistent pronunciation rules.  That would be good information to include in the article. Benandorsqueaks 22:26, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other languages
Talk:Qaqun

message: To whomever changed the rating (anon IP) from stub to B-class, could you explain your reasoning? I think the article still needs more development myself, though it was more than a stub. Also, I'd like to raise the importance to medium in light of that (instead of high, since its now not a stub) so that it doesn't fall completely off the project's worklist radar. Tiamut 21:29, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

message: I wonder, is there really a reliable source for the claim that parts of the West Bank are called "Samaria" and "Judea"? To me, it appears to be Israel-specific (and thus POV) terminology. I suggest simply "The West Bank". MeteorMaker (talk) 15:40, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Samaria"? 

message: I have now added (roughly) what  Morris (2004) say about the 1948-events. He never mentions anything/any report about Iraqi attacs comming out of  Qaqun! (And he normally mentions such "incidents") And it is abundantly clear that IDF wanted the area free of Arabs. Hmmm.   Huldra (talk) 23:42, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  the 1948 part 

message: *pp. 346-348 under the name Kakoun. Tiamuttalk 09:01, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Guerin - to add
Talk:Keizer Ghidorah

message: What is it with you people? Keizer Ghidorah is not King Ghidorah. Just because he has Ghidorah on the last part of his name doesn't mean he's King Ghidorah. Death Ghidorah has Ghidorah in the name but not King Ghidorah. Why don't you people understand? Don't redirect the page again.  --Naruto134 00:00, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Apelinq, if your thinking about redirecting this page, forget about it. Is there proof that Toho considers Keizer Ghidorah a form of KG? Exactly, that's what I thought. --Naruto134 00:00, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

text: Be civil. And here's your proof. And also, at the back of the DVD box of Final Wars they show the logo "Monster X II". Now your YOU show me proof he's King Ghidorah. --Naruto134 00:00, August 17 2007 (UTC)
Fan made websites do not counts as proof. The Monster X II logo is the same as the King Ghidorah logo, so that is moot. I tell you go go ask any one person that operates Sci Fi Japan but you fail to show you have done it. --CLS 19:34, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Enough of this vandalism. Repeat this redirecting again and I will have an admin block you. Monster X II is not King Ghidorah's. If it was King Ghidorah, they would put King Ghidorah instead of Monster X II on the logo. Face it, I'm right and you're wrong. Don't get emotional that your wrong. And don't think what I'm doing is vandalism because undoing is not vandalism. --Naruto134 00:00, August 17 2007 (UTC)
You accuse me of vandalism when your getting bots making warnings on edits you've made, and making childish threats. You've failed to prove outside of fan websites on the creature's status .--CLS 20:43, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Keizer Ghidorah is '''NOT''' King Ghidorah!

message: I have restored the textual version, as the redirect did not work (the link is defective).  It seems that what is being attempted is really a merge with another article.  Please follow the procedure set out in Wikipedia:Merging_and_moving_pages#Proposing_a_merger and attempt to reach an agreement.  Edit warring will not be productive, nor will the use of invective in discussions.  Kablammo 20:58, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge?
Talk:Constant Lambert

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 01:34, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: The current article (at Feb 2019) states "Lambert himself considered he had failed as a composer, and completed only two major works in the remaining sixteen years of his life." No source reference is given for these assertions. The last 16 years of Lambert's life covers the period 1935 to 1951, and the list of compositions suggests that he certainly composed more than two major works in this period. He certainly didn't stop composing altogether, as one who considered themselves failed might be expected to do. Perhaps the person who wrote the statement has a different view of what constitutes major works for a composer? I suggest that unless there is a reference attribution for the statement it should be removed or corrected.
86.185.92.26 (talk) 20:46, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Compositions 

message: *"his health, which declined further with the development of diabetes that remained undiagnosed and untreated until very late in his life".
*"Lambert died on 21 August 1951, two days short of his forty-sixth birthday, of pneumonia and undiagnosed diabetes"
The two statements contradict each other. Was the condition diagnosed during his lifetime or not? Tim riley talk 09:14, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diagnosis
Talk:Heathrow Junction railway station

message: I'm confused by this sentence:
"Heathrow Junction station was situated in Stockley Park, slightly to the north of the station."
Does this mean the Heathrow Junction station was north of Stockley Park station, Heathrow Junction station was in the northern end of Stockley Park (an actual park), the park was actually north of the station (but the station wasn't part of it) or that the station was in the park, but in the southern end (with the rest of the park to the north of it)? As the sentence stands, it's impossible to tell -- can someone with knowledge (and references) resolve it? Gusworld 21:01, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Station location 

message: is this  a photo of the station ??? Pickle 14:20, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think so the platform canopies are the samr as in the image nw added to the article 88.109.9.150 (talk) 17:15, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo
Talk:KULL

message: Page revision history shows ownership change "from FCC database".  FCC database shows no change in ownership as of 9/26/07, and no application is currently pending..  The sale was announced, but is likely contingent on the approval of the Clear Channel transaction being approved, which only occurred yesterday.StreamingRadioGuide 11:25, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A while back(sorry, don't recall exactly when), 100.7 changed to "True Oldies." I don't know a thing about editing, so I thought it should be mentioned. Just in case anyone reads this, anyways.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.252.72.6 (talk) 18:37, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  No longer The Eagle
Talk:JNR Class DE10

message: Does anyone know the axle loading for these - particularly if it varied between the two bogies.
What was the design rationale for using two asymmetric bogies? Was it to even up the axle loading, per axle, for a design that otherwise placed a highly asymmetric load across the two bogies. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:52, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Axle loading?
Talk:KVLX

message: Neither article is encyclopedic.... the KXCS article contains no history prior to the day it underwent the format change... the bulk of the article is an unsourced list of non-notable persons that used to work at the station. 
This article consists mostly of contact information, which is specifically mentioned as inappropriate in What Wikipedia is Not.  Wikipedia is not a place to conduct business.StreamingRadioGuide 00:50, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Article has been wikified and generally improved along with references to FCC and Arbitron provided information.--Rtphokie (talk) 23:36, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

text: KXCS-FM has been merged into this article.EagleAg04 (talk) 15:37, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article merger