lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Isospin

message: It would be useful to include in this article a discussion of the distinction between isospin as a notational convenience and isospin as a concept which has dynamical implications.  This is discussed, for example, in Griffiths
.Griffiths, David. Introduction to Elementary Particles. Wiley-VCH, 2008, p.129-136..  The example
he uses is that the Hamiltonian for the deuteron can have terms that depend on the product of the isospins of the two 
nucleaons e.g. {I^{(1)}} \cdot {I^{(2)}} so long as it is unchanged
under isospin rotations (e.g. SU(2)). Without some kind of example like this introduction of the symmetry group SU(2) to describe isospin is very perplexing, especially to the novice.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Luriol (talk • contribs) 19:47, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Dynamical Aspects of Isospin

message: The lede in this article really, really, really needs to make explicit that isospin (discussed) is NOT weak isospin (found elsewhere). A reader shouldn't have to dig through 2/3rds of it to find that out.Abitslow (talk) 20:59, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. This article should be renamed to Strong isospin to reflect current literature nomenclature, with Isospin made into a disambiguation page. —wing gundam 17:37, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weak Isospin 

message: This article should be renamed to Strong isospin to reflect current literature nomenclature. The name isospin is only used when there is no likelihood of ambiguity. This is typically the case for discussions of Weak isospin and Strong isospin in the literature, where the technical content provides differentiating context to familiar readers, but for not an encyclopedia. —wing gundam 17:37, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename to Strong isospin 

message: The section describing Heisenberg's work does not match the comments in
* "Remarks on the history of isospin" Brown, L.M. (Northwestern Univ., Evanston, IL (USA). Dept. of Physics and Astronomy) in Festi-Val: Festschrift for Val Telegdi 1988 
Specifically "strong interaction between any pair of nucleons is the same" did not come from Heisenberg. Furthermore his work was not related to the kind of symmetry was ultimately connected to isospin. Johnjbarton (talk) 17:22, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I corrected the worst of the bits about Heisenberg. More of the Brown history could be used to complete the History section. (The only other major secondary sources seem to be in German and French?) Johnjbarton (talk) 18:21, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mischaracterization of Heisenberg's work.
Talk:Subatomic particle

message: If  was unable to explain how is the “classification” helpful for e.g. , then ’ll remove the section altogether. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 10:36, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added in "fundamental" to make things a bit more precise. I think the details of the eta and eta-prime mesons are considerably more technical than appropriate for the level of this article. TychosElk (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 12:17, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  What is the title of this article – “subatomic particle”, right? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 17:13, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  By generation 

message: Sub atomic particles. 202.69.15.235 (talk) 14:30, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction to biology 

message: In other words, what is smaller than a subatomic particle that also makes a subatomic particle? 2603:7000:802:E038:60B9:D6B5:78BA:5FAE (talk) 13:17, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  What makes a subatomic particle? 

message: While doing research on this article, I took a look at the various sources sited. I took attention at the Archive.org link to a now broken link to the Center for Non-Destructive Evaluation of Iowa State University [regarding subatomic particles]. I managed to find a way to the main, updated website and found a non-broken and more recent version of this subject in said website. I was thinking if perhaps we incorporate this updated link as a source for the page, either remplacing all mentionings of the older Archived link or adding onto them?
The updated link in question: https://www.nde-ed.org/Physics/AtomElements/subatomicparticles.xhtml D2Owiki (talk) 13:29, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add updated source
Talk:Parti présidentiel

message: I am trying to create a page for Yvon Dupuis, past leader of the Parti Présidentiel... in vain. When I save what I wrote for the page, it brings me back to a page telling me that Wikipedia does not yet have an article on the subject. Can anyone explain this? Thanks. --Liberlogos 01:05, 9 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Chevrolet Impala

message: I think I should explain my edits.  The car in the picture is definitely a '68.  The side marker light in the front fender is a giveaway--they became federal standard in '68.  Also, my recollection is that the Car of the Year award for '77 was for the Caprice, not the Impala, and the Wiki COTY article supports this.  RivGuySC 02:38, 9 Jul 2004 (UTC)

message: I added Pontiac Grand Prix as predecessor. Yes, different brands I know. But a name is just a name, and the Chevy SS replaced the Pontiac G8, so the Impala most certainly did take place of both the W-body predecessor and the related Grand Prix model. The Epilson-body model was a far more luxurious vehicle, too. W-body never had a Cadillac relative, whereas Epsilon has plenty like the Cadillac XTS.
https://www.torquenews.com/106/2014-chevrolet-impala-2ltz-review-copious-amounts-luxury-redefine-impala-name/amp 2600:6C50:4000:27D0:A081:5A33:DE8D:F72C (talk) 10:56, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just a reminder 

message: The section for the SS sits between the fourth- and fifth-generation sections, but covers both. Would it make more sense to move this section to the end, or split it between the two generation sections? --Sable232 (talk) 14:33, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Impala SS section
Talk:Muntz Car Company

message: Dear Authors,
I think this entry should be titled "Muntz automobile" instead of the company name.
It should be modified accordingly here and in the list of automobile maunfacturers as well.
Regards,
--Millisits 02:58, 9 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion 

message: I'd say the French car: Citroën DS, introduced for sale October 5, 1955, Paris Motor Show, is extremely close in style to the Muntz cars, just they say it took 18 years of development having the DS produced. More Data? Thanks, regards. Salut +--Hijuecutivo (talk) 13:51, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Muntz remake or Phenocopy in France?
Talk:Love Everybody

message: :Image:2004 pusa love everybody.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 23:33, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:2004 pusa love everybody.jpg
Talk:Flags of the Confederate States of America

message: I don't really see much of an excessive amount of citations. Can someone please tell me how many there are? NintendoTTTEfan2005 (talk) 04:00, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Cite quantity seems fine. I just removed the drive-by tag. I agree with the tagger that there are too many long quotes in cites, though. Those should get pared out; I don't see any reason to keep any of them. VQuakr (talk) 21:29, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: The quote "the legality of Missouri's secession is contested" is quite risible. It is illegal for any state to secede from the Union because it is a "perpetual union" among the states. This fact was the entire basis for Lincoln's prosecution of the war. GnatFriend (talk) 10:40, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  First Flag: the Stars and Bars 

message: Over the course of the flag's use by the CSA, additional stars were added to the canton, eventually bringing the total number to thirteen-a reflection of the Confederacy's claims of having admitted the border states of Kentucky and Missouri, where slavery was still widely practiced.[e][22]
"Where slavery was still widely practiced" isn't in the article. 107.204.84.73 (talk) 11:21, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not in cited source 

message: Changing the national flag in the middle of a war seems a strange thing to do. Some explanation is in order. Isaac Rabinovitch (talk) 03:13, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why was the Stars and Bars flag abandoned?
Talk:Fault (breeding)

message: I'd remove the list that simply repeats what's in Conformation point; could just make it clearer that they're listed there (e.g., "See conformation for a list of areas in which faults can occur" or the like).  Elf | Talk 03:50, 9 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, agreed; problem was that I wrote this one first.  I've amended it. Quill 09:30, 9 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Korg

message: There is nothing about the N series in the article. --Martinxxxx72 09:47, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  N series 

message: This piano module is not in the list of Korg products. According to my manual it was produced in 1988 and contains two piano sounds as well as a slot for a memory card. 
One of them is the Combo Kit, containing sounds for saxophone, organ, fretless bass, and drums.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gwgoldb (talk • contribs) 20:20, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  P3 piano module 

message: The EPS-1 electric piano isn't mentioned either. 
http://matrixsynth.blogspot.com/2006/12/korg-eps-1.html
A fairly good summary of the product line is at:
http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/Oct02/articles/korg40th.asp  —Preceding unsigned comment added by StephenSmith (talk • contribs) 21:38, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Synth category 

message: I added a bit on the Kaossilator, some from what I remember and some from the page that someone created specifically for it here on Wikipedia. Please correct me if I'm wrong, particularly if the usage of "step sequencer" is an incorrect way to describe it's looping function. I might add some sources later today, though it seems that not one person has added any for this page so far. Oh well... Ryan M. (talk) 14:36, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kaossilator 

message: This is full of pure spamvertorial ("a difficult challenge, that Korg faced with the usual, savvy sense of adventure"?). Unless someone can suggest a way to salvage it, I'm going to remove that timeline altogether. – iridescent 15:55, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is pure puffery 

message: Sou formado em órgan Electone pela Yamaha Music Center e pelo Centro Musical.Sou compositor,arranjador e produtor musical.Tenho a carteira profissional da órdem dos musicos e sou estudante de Publicidade e Propaganda na PUC Minas.
Quero de saber se vocês tem algum curso de produção musical , pois gostaria de ensinar um dia.
Tenho o interesse de ensinar esta arte e , para isso quero saber qual o caminho.
Atenciosamente,
Guilherme Pacheco.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.37.129.213 (talk) 02:01, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guilherme Pacheco 

message: So when did they actually change the company name to KORG? The article does not mention that.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laserjones (talk • contribs) 00:46, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Company name
Talk:Norm Coleman

message: "Online reference site Wikipedia blames US Congress staff for partisan changes to a number of political biographies."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.108.253.186 (talk) 16:33, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Congress 'made Wikipedia changes' - 

message: I noticed that some really interesting information has been removed from this article.  The following quote is from a 2007 version of the article.  I did not contribute it, but I thought it was a fascinating look at how Coleman changed from an anti-war activist to a high-profile conservative.  The pictures, now gone from Wikipedia, can be found here and here.
I would propose adding some of this back to the article - to the extent that it can be sourced.  Cheers,  MakeBelieveMonster (talk) 01:05, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  College activism
Talk:XV International AIDS Conference, 2004

message: If there are any other Wikipedians attending the conference, please get in touch with me at adam@carringbush.net.  Adam 06:04, 9 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Gibson Les Paul

message: In a 1992 interview (published only recently), Ted McCarty explained a few things.
:We made a guitar out of solid rock maple. Wasn’t good. Too shrill, too much sustain. And we made one out of mahogany. Too soft. Didn’t quite have that thing. So we finally came up with a maple top and a mahogany back, made a sandwich out of it, glued ‘em together. …we carved the maple top, like we’d do on an L-5 and an L-7.
:Tony Mottola was probably the number one guitarist in New York City at the time. I sent one to Tony for his opinion. He was strictly an acoustic man—he didn’t think too much of any electric guitar. It was attractive. … So I got an opinion from him and from several other people. … Well he didn’t particularly care for it. It was a solidbody and he was a hollowbody man. But he did say that it was an attractive guitar and it played well, and that was an end of it.
:And knowing Les and Mary, I decided maybe I ought to show this guitar to them. … the only change... we had a regular trapeze tailpiece, and Les came up with the idea, instead of having the strings hooked into the tailpiece, he had a solid steel bar wrapped around. He liked that, so we changed to it—we made them that way.
:We spent a year designing that guitar, and he never saw it until I took it to Pennsylvania.
These and other points ought be incorporated into Gibson Les Paul.Weeb Dingle (talk) 06:28, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Les Paul didn't invent the Les Paul 

message: Why are so many sentences written backwards? like "in xxxx to help tuning were grover tuners introduced".  Paraphrasing, but there is crap like that throughout. The only being that talks like that is Yoda. Mhannigan (talk) 04:37, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yoda Speak 

message: I'm not really sure a lot of these models meet the threshold of Notability, as they seem to be largely cited straight from Gibson or its subsidiaries (which is sort of edging its way into advertising as well). At very least, some better sources are needed, but I can also see a case being made for just removing models that are only cited by the company itself. -MJ (talk) 19:14, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm going to be fairly aggressive about removing unsourced material from the section. there's not a lot here that seems well cited. -MJ (talk) 01:16, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Signature models largely primarily sourced 

message: The Standard only applied to the 1960 year model. Prior to 1960, they were called “Regulars”. 216.193.142.70 (talk) 04:24, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Standard 

message: Not sure how to fix this, not a wikipedian.  Keep up the great work, folks! 96.245.174.42 (talk) 13:19, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed - although he was often credited as "Keith Richard" early in his career. Thanks for pointing this out. Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 13:53, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Keith Richard vs. Keith Richards.  Link is wrong also
Talk:Lyttelton, New Zealand

message: Why on Earth move this from Lyttelton, New Zealand? If there's any disambiguation necessary, Lyttelton itself is available, as is  Lyttelton (New Zealand). --wwoods 06:46, 9 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Renaming
Talk:List of horse races

message: Given that there appear to be very few steeplechases, it might be an idea to merge the two lists and flag the steeplechases with '*' and/or a footnote. -- Solipsist 06:47, 9 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Contest

message: *The Talk Page was archived.
*The Article itself was substantially revamped and cleaned up. This article has been one that has long been a target for vandalism, unsourced statements, and just plain overall nonesense, which has made it a poor example of WP. It has come to light by the Nathan's company admitting that there really was ZERO evidence the contest existed before 1972, it was all just a myth and legend (that, of course, they had no problem perpetuating). So any and all claims to winners and results prior to 1972 have to be considered vandalism from here on out. Hopefully this recent effort will keep this article in line for a while. Doctorindy (talk) 20:27, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Article and Talk page cleanup

message: I am the nephew of the contest winner in 1973.  My uncle Michael Rabin won the contest eating 5 hot dogs in 3 minutes. My father, Michael's brother, and my aunt, Michael's sister all bear witness.  They all grew up in Queens, off Springfield blvd.  He was given a trophy inscribed with "1973 Hot Dog King."  I have added his name into the results section for the year 1973, but it continues to get edited away.  I'm new to Wiki editing and would greatly appreciate some help in adding his name.  
Mrrabin (talk) 17:21, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: We need a reliable,published source.  Unfortunately, your knowledge as his nephew or that of other family members is not verifiable.  We cannot include information that is not reliably sourced and verifiable, even if true.  If you can cite a published, reliable source that mentions your uncle in this context, it can be added to the article. General Ization Talk    17:27, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Is there any reliable record of past winners? Many of the winners for the early years of the contest do not have referenced sources listed. Should these not all be removed from the article seeing as they are not reliable, verifiable, or sourced? If there is no one contesting the truth can he be added to the list?  Mrrabin (talk) 17:35, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I do not know of a database of past winners; one may certainly exist somewhere.  I cannot account for every previous edit to this article, and the others are not the subject of our conversation.  Unsourced content cannot be added to the encyclopedia just because no one objects (and I have objected).  Please see WP:BURDEN. General Ization Talk    17:43, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

text: California Mermaid (talk) 23:13, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

text: https://ghkasa.com/2023-hot-dog-eating-contest-nathans-hot-dog-eating/ California Mermaid (talk) 23:24, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Here is the story... California Mermaid (talk) 23:24, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  1973 Contest Winner
Talk:Treelang

message: This article was made primarily to avoid a dead link in the GCC page, and to satisfy curiosity as to what Treelang is. Further expansion by someone familiar with compiler development who can help explain why Treelang might be interesting would be welcome. Jeeves 08:27, 9 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: And that exactly justifies its existence. I was compiling GCC, and I noticed that there is a option to enable this strange "Treelang". Not knowing what it is, I checked here, and got my answer. 84.2.82.96 08:58, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

text: unfortunately it is hard to write much more, I think it is destined to become a curiosity of history... Justinc (talk) 10:50, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

text: especially as the gcc page has dropped the link...Justinc (talk) 10:51, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Crowd

message: I'm a student in Nancy Darling's Adolescent Development Seminar at Oberlin College. I'm writing an article on crowds in adolescent peer groups. I may delete the bit here, incorporate bits of it into my article, and just add that as another meaning in the disambiguation page. Would anyone have any strong objections to that? Halbereth (talk)
--Well, no one has protested, so I went ahead and did it. Halbereth (talk) 15:18, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation

message: Article listed on WP:VFD July 9 to July loco 19 2004, was redirected to The Crowd.  Discussion:
Dictdef, and reads like a copyvio.  RickK 06:29, Jul 9, 2004 (UTC)
*Move to Wiktionary Kevyn 09:34, 9 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: VFD

message: Propose to merge Angry mob to Crowd, basically this is where it belongs. No reason to have a separate article sizewise per WP:SPLIT, and Angry mob has been POV-tagged since May 2012. Brandmeistertalk   17:54, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: This is the same thing as Mobbing, I will redirect it there. BigJim707 (talk) 16:57, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Reeh–Schlieder theorem

message: Some rationale behind my edits and lowering the connection with entanglement:
* I don't find the term super entanglement besides some isolated papers and this Wikipedia entry
* IMHO the Reeh-Schlieder theorem is more a problem in formulating QFT than a real indication of of non-local action. If the long range actions of the local algebras would be exactly 0, the mathematics of QFT would be much more easier, most likely to easy to a rich theory. But in all practical senses the non-local effects vanish just some atoms to left. Whereas the point of interest in Quantum Entanglement is, that some correlations can be preserved for macroscopic distances. 
Pjacobi 09:25, 9 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Margaret of Provence

message: Counts of Provence does not list #5, it only goes up to Ramon Berenguer IV, Count of Provence. m.e. 09:42, 9 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  [Untitled]

message: : He is numbered Ramon Berenguer IV of Provence; V of Aragon. Eugene van der Pijll 21:50, 3 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled