lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Damir Škaro

message: Škaro's opinion is irrelevant and off-topic here; it does not contribute to the article. GregorB (talk) 16:58, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Why is that? An article about Škaro (and a very short one at that) can't include his opinion on Serbia appropriating his medals? I don't see how this can be off-topic. His notability stems from his medal, so any info about it is definately relevant.--Thewanderer (talk) 14:58, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the statement again. It is unnecessarily inflammatory and actually shows him in a bad light without actually imparting useful information about him. Merely saying that he's against Serbia claiming his medals would be sufficient, if not actually useful or important. Serbia's stance on the medals is a broader issue, and I can't imagine any of the Croatian sportspeople actually agreeing with it. If Škaro had agreed that his medal actually belonged to Serbia, that would perhaps be a fact of note here. GregorB (talk) 00:01, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed paragraph
Talk:Bark Mitzvah

message: I think "traditionally" is a strong word to use considering that there is nothing traditional about this practice, it is a new undertaking.  "Traditionally" also implies an overgeneralization since there is great variation among the bark mitzvahs that have taken place (or at least the ones that have been publicized), including the age at which the bark mitzvah takes place (whether it be 13 in dog years or people years). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.220.109.186 (talk • contribs) 18:44, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nothing traditional

message: I don't see why these three "Bark Mitzvahs" were notable.  True, they were covered in newspapers or on television. But, as I understand it, not as a notable event per se, only as a generic example of  a recent trend or novel idea. --The very model of a minor general (talk) 23:34, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable? 
Talk:Disney's Fairy Tale Weddings & Honeymoons

message: This sentence: "The Disney's Fairy Tale Weddings & Honeymoons is a program offering wedding and honeymoon services to couples at the Disneyland Resort in California, the Walt Disney World Resort in Florida, the Hong Kong Disneyland Resort in Hong Kong, and on the Disney Cruise Line" 
Disney's Fairy Tale Weddings & Honeymoons, was copied from this website: http://disneythemeparks.wikia.com/wiki/Disney%27s_Fairy_Tale_Weddings_%26_Honeymoons
Gzaf21 (talk) 15:06, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Cirsonella laxa

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 . It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:59, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Coventry and Bedworth urban area

message: I can't really find much in the references given to support the notion that there is a recognised 'Coventry/Bedworth urban area'. The Labour market profile  says it is for Coventry, and gives a map which clearly excludes Bedworth. And the second reference  shows a map which does give some support for the idea of a recognised Coventry/Bedworth urban area, but it is from an archived source which gives no other context. I'm not sure as it stands that there is enough in the references to support the existence of this article as it stands. Unless there are some more up to date ones I haven't found. G-13114 (talk) 16:53, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I Wouldnt consider Citypopulation.de a reliable source. The coventry/bedworth area definitely exists but im not sure its really notable enough for its own article, its just coventry plus one small town that exists outside its official boundaries because of the quirks of local adminstrative history. Eopsid (talk) 20:40, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

text: Just looking at the stats that estimate population looks suspiciously high. It would imply that Coventry's population has grown by 60,000 in 9 years, an almost 20% increase. Eopsid (talk) 20:56, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weak support for this article in references
Talk:Cirsonella maoria

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 . It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:58, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Cirsonella paradoxa

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 . It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:27, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Cirsonella propelaxa

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 . It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:26, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Cirsonella simplex

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 ISBN 0-00-216906-1. It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:25, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Cirsonella variecostata

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 . It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:24, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Cirsonella waikukuensis

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 . It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:23, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Éclair

message: A possible origin for the name "éclair" would be that the pastry is generally quick to prepare and simple.
As they say in french "vite comme l'éclair" : "quick like lightning"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mapdark (talk • contribs) 17:42, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: A note

message: The recipe linked to shows that chocolate eclairs are filled with vanilla pastry cream so it is not true that the icing is the same flavor as the filling.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sheherazahde (talk • contribs) 19:54, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Another note

message: Tagged Moorkop to merge in.  Moorkop is the Dutch name for a Chocolate Eclair.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 21:32, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. A merge is in order. Richigi (talk) 04:44, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, maybe. I just searched for images of moorkop, and they actually look like chocolate profiteroles. I mean, they are round rather than oblong. The question: do we define eclairs by their shape or the chocolate glaze? Richigi (talk) 05:25, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Surely Moorkop would (and should) merge with Bossche bol instead. Incremental Improvements (talk) 21:41, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur, Moorkop should be merged with Bossche Bol, not with eclair, particularly considering that both are spherical and originated in the Netherlands.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.208.170.26 (talk) 17:02, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: The 6th citation (which is supposed to go to an article about why the eclair is named after lightning) instead redirects to a website that seems to be about gambling. We should investigate this and possibly remove the citation if there is nothing we can do about the redirect. 209.237.105.194 (talk) 15:53, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: still not fixed. 158.181.80.90 (talk) 22:04, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation #6 goes to lottery/gambling site
Talk:Phoebus of Lusignan

message: I'm no expert, but Google Books returns two hits of "Phoebus of Lusignan":
* France and the Holy Land: Frankish culture at the end of the Crusades‎ - Page 136 by Daniel H. Weiss, Lisa J. Mahoney
* Caterina Cornaro, Queen of Cyprus‎ - Page 62 by David Hunt, Peter W. Edbury, Joachim G. Joachim
and "Phoebus de Lusignan" returns no fewer than 41.  Pace Mirror Lead (talk) 02:04, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hoax or not?
Talk:Temperature record since 1880

message: The reference to the data pointed to ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/anomalies/annual.land_and_ocean.90S.90N.df_1901-2000mean.dat which did not match the data in the table.   It looks like they changed their procedures and might have had an error on the site earlier this year.  I copied in the relevant entries, but did not resort the rows.  2006 looks out of place with the NCDC data.  If there is a reference for the middle column, maybe it should be added.  If not, it should be removed. Drf5n (talk) 19:00, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Newer data

message: The table should probably be sortable. --Falcorian (talk) 19:42, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sortable

message: Showing 2005 isn't the hottest year ever, and is in fact, quite a cool year by comparison.  I'd say NASA is a reputable source.Sk8tuhpunk (talk) 22:00, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If there is a strong disagreement between Global data and US data, shouldn't that be reflected in an article entitled "Temperature Record since 1880"? And a further question, why is it especially this data series that was chosen, and where is the description of the plurality of data series and how they correspond to each other?158.143.136.254 (talk) 21:03, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  NASA's Data Irrelevant? 

message: I really don't see why this article can't be a part of instrumental temperature record. --bender235 (talk) 01:55, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There isn't much of value to merge. I think this merge will probably happen, so I'm going to cut the big pic to make it easier. Rv if you like it William M. Connolley (talk) 08:50, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

text: Merge will happen soon... William M. Connolley (talk) 10:59, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Done William M. Connolley (talk) 20:44, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge discussion
Talk:Ceramography

message: I will add some images of ceramographic microstructures just as soon as I can create some new ones that have not been published anywhere.--His Manliness (talk) 19:01, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

message: I found this a very useful and extremely well-written article; I've been adding links to it from relevant Wikipedia articles to help it find the readership it deserves. I'm relatively new to Wikipedia myself, and not familiar with the procedure for attaining Good Article status, but I have a hunch this one has promise.
One thing I spotted: throughout, the text refers to "microindention." Should this be "microindentation" (cf. this article )? The latter term gets many more Google hits (and I can find neither in the Oxford English Dictionary--not that it's usually very helpful on technical terms).Gonzonoir (talk) 10:23, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Microindent(at)ion

message: I moved the link to Holger F. Struer from Further Reading and External Links to a sentence under A Brief History of Ceramography.  It is not an external link.  While it could be considered further reading, the Struer article does not mention ceramography at all.His Manliness (talk) 21:03, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Struers 
Talk:Leoš Friedl

message: The name of this article should be changed to "Leos Friedl" because that is the name used on the English-language websites of the official governing bodies of tennis, which are the Association of Tennis Professionals and the International Tennis Federation.  This is also the name used on the English-language website of Davis Cup.  Finally, this is the name used on the English-language websites of the following Grand Slam tournaments: the Australian Open and the US Open.  Tennis expert (talk) 06:16, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Template talk:Miley Cyrus

message: In what sense are some of these songs singles? Does that mean they were played on Radio Disney? I hadn't considered most of the songs listed in the template to be singles distinct from other album tracks. Everyking (talk) 19:08, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: ...

message: Why is HSM 2 listed in the template??? she makes a cameo appearance for about a few seconds....i suggest we delete HSM 2 from the films section in the template. Gprince007 (talk) 15:44, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.  WAVY 10 Fan (talk) 20:00, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: High School Musical 2

message: I feel that the info in the template is too cluttered....why do we need singles as hannah montana in this Miley cyrus template box??? ....hsm two has been added again and i'll delete it as per discussion above. also soundtrack to hannah montana movie is linked to hannah montan movie.....i'll delete that also....but i feel we dont need "singles as hannah montana" in this template box....Gprince007 (talk) 15:23, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: A lot of the singles shouldn't have articles as they don't meet WP:N singles requirements. I did remove any item without an article and the singles list should get pruned as the non-notable articles get removed. --NrDg 16:16, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

text: HSM 2, Zack and Cody, etc. all shouldn't be listed, neither should a list of her music videos. I am going to attemp tto fix this. BambooBanga (talk) 18:48, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Too much clutter

message: Noah Cyrus should be added to the "related" column, her article was created a few weeks ago.. Shayanshaukat (talk) 20:23, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Noah Cyrus
Talk:Pakistan at the Olympics

message: Do we really need one? It's so depressing (BTW, I'm not Pakistani).173.63.190.247 (talk) 21:23, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Failure section

message: I m interested in gaming am fiza from Pakistan 111.88.110.136 (talk) 01:51, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Swimming 

message: 100000 180.178.170.102 (talk) 07:56, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sudtci
Talk:Mobile TV format

message: Mobile TV format wars seem to be drifting toward a regionalism, rather than technological advantages. As someone said, mobile TV viewing is for a few minutes. But in countries where the mass transit system like buses and subway trains  is more afforadable and easily accessible may tend to spend more than half an hour on watching mobile TV and other mobile content,while in the buses and subway trains. In the same vein, mobile TV viewing in USA won't likely take off in view of the current car density, which makes the ridership of mass transit system to a minimal level. It is expected that a migration of mobile TV or real-time video streaming to 'wheeled' mobile equipment may change the whole game in the end.Chmyr (talk) 19:09, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Eendrag

message: I successfully requested the reversal of the deletion of this article. This article was originally flagged for deletion due to concerns of whether this article meets Wikipedia's notability standards.
Here is a transcript of my letter to the administrator:
 — Good day
I noticed that you deleted the article "Eendrag" under the Expired:PROD guidelines.
Personally I feel that the article met Wikipedia's notability criteria. Eendrag is a student residence, but has a measurable presence on campus due to it having a student comittee, sport teams, anthem, etc. It is not the same as a residential block of apartments, but rather in instance of the house system -- compare to any instance of a university "college" at Cambridge University, or even to dormitories at MIT.
Recent independent press coverage (mainly due to a fire which gutted the top floor) can by found at News24 and AllAfrica.
I notice that two of the other campus residences, Dagbreek and Wilgenhof, have retained their own pages on Wikipedia, which points to an inconsistency. It has to be noted that these articles are often contaminated with highly subjective praise (by residents). However, this should not negate the intrinsic value of the topic.
I am curious about the motivation of the original deletion tag. I suspect it might be related to inter-residence rivalry. FMalan (talk) 15:45, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability and encyclopedic style
Talk:The Hobbit (film)

message: Now that this is official, "The Hobbit (film)" definatly deserves it's own artilce... please help me fix it up. --Acidburn24m (talk) 20:02, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Film

message: diff. sites are reproting diff. things 
ne1 have conformation  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.129.220.188 (talk) 02:01, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  two films to be two parts of hobbit with other infromation (gandalf/whie council, hunt for gollum etc.) inter laced or one film hobbit and one film other things