Talk:Cryptopsy

message: The history section here says that the band was formed in 1988 as Necrosis, but their official site and the label site too both tell that Necrosis was founded in 1992 and renamed in the same year to Cryptopsy. I have found no source for 1988, thus I'll change it. CecilK 08:10, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Founding year 

message: :Image:Cryptosy Logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:34, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Cryptosy Logo.png

message: :Image:Cryptosy Logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 18:37, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Cryptosy Logo.png

message: Can some people please look for sources on them being deathcore now because surely they're not tech/brutal death anymore... and I don't want to be a part of this at the moment and removing deathcore will just confuse readers about their old style, new album and change in style. So please leave deathcore for now until it can be sourced. −₪ÇɨгcaғucɨҲ₪  kaiden  03:49, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deathcore 

message: i have thier first three albums and i have listened to all 3 of them
i cant help but notice that the first two are tagged 'brutal' death metal
i really dont see how cryptopsy is 'brutal' death metal versus plain death metal (or technical DM) IN THE FIRST TWO ALBUMS (third has more standard death metal vocals) The vocals are extremely brief and appear to be somewhat shouted, and are not nearly as guttural or heavy as real brutal death metal bands like cannibal corpse, vital remains, etc. The instruments arent quite as downtuned as other brutal death metal bands, either.
If anything i think their first two albums should be labeled plain death metal or Technical Death metal, for they are definutely not 'brutal' death metal.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.203.211.143 (talk) 00:30, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  how is cryptopsy brutal death metal? (ESPECIALLY the first two, how are they brutal death metal rather than technical death metal???) 

message: Lord Worm used to have (and should still have) his own page, but now clicking on his name redirects to Cryptopsy, a band that he is no longer a part of. Furthermore, the page gives very little information about him, certainly less than a man of his caliber deserves. Perhaps somebody should make a page for Lord Worm. I would start it but my Wiki-editing knowledge is pretty limited. Just a thought.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.203.223.156 (talk) 00:57, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Lord Worm redirects to Cryptopsy

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cryptopsy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080702125055/http://www.revolvermag.com/content/web-exclusive-interview-cryptopsy-drummer-flo-mounier-and-new-vocalist-matt-mcgachy-their-la to http://www.revolvermag.com/content/web-exclusive-interview-cryptopsy-drummer-flo-mounier-and-new-vocalist-matt-mcgachy-their-la
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:49, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified