lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Flatliners

message: This is my first full plot addition to a film article, and I could use another set of eyes to look it over.  I can't seem to get it down much further without removing what I think are important plot points, but it still seems a touch long.  Much thanks, Fractalchez (talk) 20:31, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot

message: I removed reference to the use of the phrase "today is a good day to die", as the film "Flatliners" is not the first time this phrase has been used.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by DFS (talk • contribs) 16:39, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've moved this list here until it can be put in proper prose form and cited.--J.D. (talk) 18:49, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference in Pop Culture

message: * How Flatliners Went From a Verb to a Noun
:To use with this article.--J.D. (talk) 18:51, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Articles

message: This article doesn't have any information on the film's production. This is very important information and it needs to be added to the article.--Paleface Jack (talk) 16:01, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Production Information? 

message: The bit about, "Meanwhile, Joe's fiancee", was shifted upwards to reflect the proper chronological order of the film. It used to appear on a new paragraph. There was no real reason for the inaccurate ordering.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 23.91.136.100 (talk) 05:01, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  slight reorder
Talk:The Candidate (1972 film)

message: Y I K E R Z!!!!!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.123.241.2 (talk) 19:31, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yikerz
Talk:Colors (film)

message: What difference does it make, since Police Officer II is just a payment grade? Call him plain and simple "police officer" --Officer Boscorelli (talk) 16:43, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Police officer II 

message: Sean Penn "befriended" Richard Ramirez? Uh, yeah, right.  I seriously doubt Sean Penn would have been placed anywhere near the notorious Satanic spree killer, certainly not long enough to have "befriended" him.  And as weird as Sean Penn is, I rather doubt he'd go so far as to buddy up to such a sadistic psychopath.  That's total vandalism.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.58.106.139 (talk) 14:34, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Richard Ramirez]] 

message: According to the very own Crips code on writing, where the "ck" will be replaced with a "cc" due to the "ck" remembering the phrase "Crip Killer" (see Crips), the character named here "Rocket" (a Crip gang member) will be more precisely named if called "Roccet".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Officer Boscorelli (talk • contribs) 14:42, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mispelled gang member alias 

message: This article only needs one more section of information to reach start class (ex: box office, reception, DVD release, etc.)--Nehrams2020 09:03, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub to start

message: * Music Credits: On the page it says Music by Herbie Hancock. However, in the credits of the DVD he is not mentioned, and none of the songs inside sound like being by him. IMDB verifies that the music is by him. However, I think that is an error. asklucas 09:14, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Herbie Hancock was in the opening credits. There's some in scene music that sounds little like him.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.93.25.50 (talk) 23:41, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Errors
Talk:Inside Daisy Clover

message: While a film's original poster generally is preferable to the cover of a video or DVD release, one must also consider the quality of the image. As the picture of the original poster was faded and blurred, I have replaced it with the image that originally was added to this article. SFTVLGUY2 12:11, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox image

message: While not a hit tune, there was a notable instrumental/jazz version by pianist Bill Evans, in his album of the same name.  If anyone should ever start a trivia section, or feels it's a notable enough contribution to this movie article, please add the info.  Barbra Streisand also recorded a version in the '90s I think.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.125.225.43 (talk) 21:21, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "You're Gonna Hear From Me" 

message: The copyright year at the film's beginning shows as MCMXLV (1945).  It should be MCMLXV (1965).2605:E000:A9A6:AE00:51EF:C0CE:22A9:985E (talk) 18:02, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright Year Error
Talk:Brubaker

message: Nicholas Cage isn't listed in the credits, I couldn't find a reputable source online that listed him as having been in the movie and his cameo was too short for me to notice when I watched the movie (if, indeed, he was in it).  We need more supporting evidence to list him as being in the movie. Banaticus (talk) 17:21, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nicholas Cage 

message: Shouldn't the first line be "... a PRISON in distress ..."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.47.243.144 (talk) 14:41, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typo
Talk:Legal Eagles

message: Why was the film so expensive ? Was it fees to the stars ? Because it does not look like an expensive film to me. -- Beardo (talk) 06:27, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cost 

message: The plot summary says that Chelsea was accused of trying to steal the painting from Taft, who later drops the charges. But in the version I am watching it was his partner Forrester who was in that position, and that he "swapped" the painting to Taft. Is this an error in our plot, or are there different versions ? -- Beardo (talk) 06:27, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: IMDb says the TV version differs somewhat from the theatrical version. Not sure where we can get a WP:RELIABLE source for that, however. Muzilon (talk) 11:29, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot
Talk:Up Close & Personal (film)

message: I added an original research tag because this section looks to be entirely original research.  It should probably be removed, or if these issues have been discussed in reliable secondary sources, then the section should be cleaned up and cited.  I'm leaning towards remove though.  Bhamv (talk) 17:35, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ethical Dimensions section 

message: Title of this film is "Up Close & Personal" not "Up Close and Personal" The ampersand symbol (&) is used and not "and".  I would make the change but what happens to other links.  Is administer permission required?  Will anyone see this note on the talk page?  Later I'll check edit history and try a ping. Eschoryii (talk) 10:07, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:Spy Game

message: - I noted that someone else corrected the date, but you reverted them. I then corrected the date again, and added a ref so you would see the edit was correct, but you've reverted again. If you don't want to see refs in the plot, that's fine, but please (partially) self-revert the correct date back in (1991). Thank you - theWOLFchild 23:23, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The date has been changed multiple times, with no explanation or talk page discussion.  I checked the film, and the 1991 date is correct. The film is the only source we need. ---The Old JacobiteThe '45 23:28, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, like I said, the ref wasn't the issue, getting the correct date was and now that's resolved. Thanks - theWOLFchild 23:39, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of story 

message: if it made 206 million on a 115 million cost how was it a bomb ?--— ⦿⨦⨀Tumadoireacht Talk/Stalk 03:53, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  box office bomb? 

message: Who was she ? And what role did she perform in the making of the film? 2601:8C3:8200:ECA0:E481:B8CB:F4A7:733D (talk) 04:32, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The mother of the film's director Tony Scott. She died while the film was being made and so it was dedicated in her memory. - wolf 14:56, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elizabeth Jean Scott
Talk:Convoy (1978 film)

message: I filled in as much as I could remember about the plot.  If there's anything I missed, please feel free to add it, or I might if I come across the movie on TV and I remember to add to the article.
JesseG 15:16, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The plot

message: Is there more to the name "Rubber Duck"?
There might be, as I found out that Akron, OH is sometimes called 'The Rubber' amongst truck drivers! -andy 80.129.112.52 11:19, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Rubber Duck"

message: Isen't this movie somewhat of a cult movie?--85.167.155.213 19:07, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I bought a Scandinavian budget release on DVD, and in the presentation of Sam Peckinpah on the extres, the film is actually described as a low point in Peckinpah's career. 惑乱 Wakuran (talk) 17:38, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Cult status

message: Not sure where to add this, but the '11 long haired friends of Jesus' are lead by a Rev Joshua Duncan Sloan.. Who shows up in at least one other Peckinpah film, the Ballad of Cable Hogue.  Kweston (talk) 21:43, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Joshua Duncan Sloan

message: The whole section lacks any verifiable citation or quotable source. Material in Wikipedia is all about quotable AND verifiable contributions. Original researchs, creative freedom or personal gut feelings are unacceptable in Wikipedia, so the whole section either be properly quoted or completely removed.Flurry (talk) 19:28, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  If it doesn't have a reference soon then it should be removed.  Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 19:39, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation needed for the "Some background" section 

message: From Michael Deeley's wiki article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Deeley to the BBC documentary "Sam Peckinpah: Man of Iron", Michael Deeley is credited, whether he likes it or not, as the producer of Convoy.  What gives???User:JCHeverly 14:49, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Producer??? 

message: From the Plot section: "The "trucker" turns out to be cold county Sheriff "Dirty Lyle" Wallace ...". What's that supposed to mean? Is a "cold county Sheriff" a particular rank or status of sheriff? (It doesn't show up anywhere else.) Is he a "cold", heartless, cynical, individual (in which case the sentence needs rewording)? Is he the sheriff of Cold County (in which case it needs to be capitalised)? Is it a typo? Or does it mean something else entirely? I've got no idea. Can somebody please fix. Eric Pode lives (talk) 11:50, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cold county Sheriff 

message: Current #10 about the trucks I tried - incomprehensible, check someone. I have page of boxes instead of text, no actual pictures or anything. Sold out?
Lincoln J. (talk) 08:45, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links and References
Talk:The President's Analyst

message: IIRC, the club in which the Analyst met the Hippies and the Pudlians was the Cafe Wha?.  Do I RC? --Davecampbell (talk) 01:03, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cafe Wha? 

message: The motivation for TPC's brain implant is quite different from what's stated. I'll have to look this up and rewrite it. WilliamSommerwerck (talk) 23:03, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: incorrect plot
Talk:Winning (film)

message: :Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
*Oppose. The title is not so uncommon.--Semioli 13:08, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: Luther repeatedly tells Frank that the affair "was wrong" and then says that he's out of the picture now. Finally, Luther tells Frank that he's "won". It is at this point that Frank punches Luther. Since it could be argued that the entire title of the film is tied to this point, this really should be changed in the article.70.36.142.25 (talk) 18:12, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Luther never apologizes to Frank

message: A great deal of the material added to the Plot Summary on December 7, 2023 by an IP user is not information that is apparent from viewing the film and is POV and probably copied from the Winning novel.
This edit needs to be revised so that only the "Plot" and information apparent from watching the film is presented. Osomite 🐻 (hablemos) 04:57, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Material that was recently added to plot is a great deal of Fabulation
Talk:Pocket Money

message: Comment on Paul Newman's sauna demands in the above paragraphs- I don't belive this is true.  The movie is from the book Jim Kain by JPS Brown.  In the book, Jim Kain goes to town and steams the hotel bathroom as a luxury.  JPS Brown wrote Jim Kain long before knowing any habits of Paul Newman.
- AZ Rancher
This comment was left in the article by User:Azrancher. I've moved it here so somebody with knowledge of the subject can check it out. Rje (talk) 00:17, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sauna Scene

message: These two sections, "Role in the history of film" and "Trivia", seem to violate WP:OR and WP:POV rules. They seem to be someones opinionated BS. 4.240.159.248 (talk) 23:32, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Role in the history of film and Trivia Sections
Talk:The Drowning Pool (film)

message: I've just changed the character's name from J.J. to J. Hugh, because that is for sure what he is called in the movie. IMDB has it wrong. Here is a clip . Beeblebrox (talk) 02:27, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kilbourne
Talk:Message in a Bottle (film)

message: I can't see any way to wikify this stub anymore than it is... I'm gonna remove the wikify tag. --DrGaellon 02:38, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikify
Talk:Empire Falls (miniseries)

message: Why is this page mostly about the mini-series vs. the book?  The latter after all is the Pulitizer prize winning masterpiece....  Do we need two pages? Dcyprian 13:49, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm surprised no one has agreed to this since this question was first posed.  I definitely agree that they should be split into mini-series and novel; otherwise it's just messy and misleading. Maria 21:10, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done! Empire Falls (miniseries) and Empire Falls.  Fixing all of the links as of now. Maria 21:46, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Split

message: I've only read the book, not seen the movie, but ... what does the second sentence here mean exactly?
;A priest whose mind is decaying into a state where he says nasty things to people. Despite helping steal money from the church, he's still a priest who serves God.
I don't remember Father Tom doing much in the way of service in the book... --Jfruh 23:34, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "still a priest"? 

message: I just organized the cast and charactors into tables. I think it looms OK but not sure. Any thoughts? Much thanks.--RobNS 04:18, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it looks fine, but I'm not sure about the character's description in italics; it makes it somewhat difficult to read large blocks of text in italics, I find.  Other than that, nice job. :) María (críticame) 15:43, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

text: I've struck out my previous comment, I'm sorry; I didn't remember seeing a large table like this on a film before, so I checked Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Style guidelines and it seems they discourage such extensive formatting.  I'm sorry, but I've reverted it.  Guideline takes precedence over looks.  María (críticame) 15:47, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tables
Talk:Agatha (film)

message: This article is currently part of :Category:Adaptations of works by Agatha Christie. Question: In what way is this film of an adaptation of a Christie work? (Unless we are calling her decision to go into seclusion in itself to be a work of performance art?) Unless there is a reason to keep it in that category, I am going to move it to the more general :Category:Agatha Christie. Let's discuss as needed. Thanks KConWiki (talk) 16:53, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Adaptations Category?
Talk:The Messenger: The Story of Joan of Arc

message: Seriously or is this just trolling?
-G
:It SERIOUSLY is in that order. Watch this clip. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Y-eQfs_oFk
:However, since the phrase is used in this New York Times review and is probably where it comes from, perhaps quotations would be in order? http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=980CE3D91F3AF931A25752C1A96F958260 Jaimeastorga2000 22:23, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No need to cite - just change the way it's written to make it a little more formal and encyclopedic.  I made the adjustment.  Justi521 (talk) 00:28, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "...murdered and raped... ''(in that order)''"

message: Usually film articles have a "Reception" section after the plot summary.  However, the "Reception" is currently in the article summary at the top, making the entire article a little top-heavy (everything's in the article summary, nothing in the article!).  I will probably come back to this and work on it when I have some time, but if someone else would like to start cleaning up the article and making it a little more user-friendly, plesae do!  Thanks.  Justi521 (talk) 22:48, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Reception" 

message: I notice that the physical appearence of Faye Dunaway's character, Yolande of Aragon, is astonishingly similar to that of Malthazard, the villain in another of Luc Besson's films, Arthur and the Invisibles. Both are tall and thin with a pallid visage, long, dark robes and a tall black headdress. I was wondering if this was a style often employed by Besson to portray sinister characters. If so, should it be noted? It at least deserves a mention in the style section of Besson's article, assuming such a section exists. --Dominus Noster (talk) 22:12, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Yolande of Aragon

message: Comprehending Rome, Italy, or France, at the times of Joan of Arc, difficult enough, concerning liabilities to media proposals, theatres, and hollywood, in relating things to audiences; per say? Opinion? Mysticism could have played a valuable part in laws and what would be considered just. I am Joan of Arc Angel. What is a crack pipe? I will find you if I need you. Good luck. 75.201.13.119 (talk) 16:28, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Put the crack pipe down.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.146.160.51 (talk) 13:32, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dauphin 

message: Doucheblade....lol..wtf is that at the bottom..but whatever it is, it says the word doucheblade, so ipso facto it is now notable and should stay because thats pretty awesome. 69.244.117.28 (talk) 22:56, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Douchblade
Talk:Moonlight Mile (film)

message: are you kidding me? why moonlight mile redirects here? a mediocre movie named AFTER the rolling stones song? It seems kinda strange to me... i don't know how to fix it, so if somebody else thinks this way please change it.Sickboy3883 (talk) 20:43, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect

message: Kind of incoherent. Why were invitations sent out? For what occasion? AlbertSM (talk) 21:25, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot summary
Talk:Racing Stripes

message: Hayden Panettiere  claims on the The Graham Norton Show aired on 7 june 2013 that she was thrown of a zebra for the film.  receiving a concusion, wiplash, and 2 broken vertabre.  has anyone else a diffrent source for this??  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sfrigger (talk • contribs) 20:51, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

message: Mentioned is a Nick series called "Racing Stripes: The Series".  Problem is, I can't find any mention of it at the IMDB, on any of the actors' bios, etc.  Doubt this series ever existed. Michael A. Goodfellow (talk) 20:38, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Racing Stripes: The Series"
Talk:Welcome to Mooseport

message: User:7dcf does little on Wikipedia except add links to movie reviews by James Berardinelli, and he had been edit-warring with at least two editors, User:BilCat and myself, to add this promotional linkspam to this article and to  :Fatal Instinct here and others. He appears to be either James Berardinelli himself or a meat-puppet. And he is violating WP:BRD by re-reverting and not coming to the talk page to discuss and to try to reach consensus with other editors. --Tenebrae (talk) 14:28, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Promotional linksmap
Talk:Heist (2001 film)

message: The railings of the boat are brass. No one familiar with both metals would ever mistake brass for gold, but it happens a lot in movies and television. The Maltese Falcon, Tales of the Gold Monkey, etc.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.113.49.126 (talk) 08:43, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Boat 

message: "They attempt to rob the plane twice. .... Because of this Joe calls the robbery off for that day."  Uncited, of course, and unless that's sourced my opinion is it's purely wrong.  There's nothing, dialog or otherwise, in the movie to suggest they were trying to execute the plane heist instead of just scouting.  But I figured I'd leave it in long enough for whomever wrote it to cite it in case I'm wrong. 98.215.83.71 (talk) 02:26, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conclusion / OR in plot? 

message: The last paragraph says "Fran, still pretending to be with Jimmy". I think that there is no proof that she's just pretending.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.43.210.19 (talk) 20:02, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot - finale
Talk:The Mexican

message: This is mostly a copy of the first link. Needs rewriting.Andycjp 15:30, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

message: There are too many spoliers in the plot listing, including the identity of the man who plays Margolise. If anyone curious about the film were to come here, they would have the whole movie ruined. I am therefore editing it downObriensg1 (talk) 18:51, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It is standard wikipedia policy taht the plot section includes spoilers. And why shouldn't we include the identity of the actor ? I found it odd that it wasn't included - what's the big surprise ? -- Beardo (talk) 18:45, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spoliers