lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Spinner shark

message: This article was based on the corresponding article at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, neither of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 21:24, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: * link
I feel like this was newsworthy enough and notable enough to deserve some kind of mention in the article, I'm just not sure where. -Deathsythe (talk) 12:16, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It's cool, but beyond that it's trivial. It doesn't say anything about the species that we didn't already know. That doesn't merit an article mention. Maybe an external link as a (poor) illustration of the behavior, but I have my doubts about the permanency of that link. -- Yzx (talk) 18:26, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Since the Spinner being one of the sharks that are prone to arials, like mako or great whites are, ("The shark's momentum at the end of these spiraling runs often carries it into the air, giving it its common name") it could be put in around that area, as a reference even perhaps or as you suggested, an external link to demonstrate this behavior. -Deathsythe (talk) 20:11, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Video of Spinner Shark jumping at New Smyrna Beach, FL
Talk:Spot-tail shark

message: This article was based on the corresponding article at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, neither of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 21:59, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Lilo Pelekai

message: It's unfair that Lilo's page has to be so crummy compared to Stitch's! I have started expanding it (I wasn't the one who added the tag, though) and I'd like some help.
First and foremost, we need to expand the history section. Also, I think Lilo's picture should be replaced by one of her wearing her muumuu, and some more pictures should be added throughout the article (like, for example, a picture of Lilo's photo of her family).
Anyone have any more information on Lilo's family? I remember that she mentioned an uncle by name, but I don't have a recording of that episode. Miriam The Bat 21:36, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Let's get some things done 

message: Why is this here? It is all unsourced point of view, and as such should be removed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.106.41.3 (talk) 20:18, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Character Perception
Talk:Spotted estuary smooth-hound

message: This article was based on the corresponding section in Ayling's Collins Guide to the Sea Fishes of New Zealand, and/or corresponding articles at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, none of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 21:50, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Spurdog

message: Roughskin spurdog Cirrhigaleus asper seems to suggest that Spurdogs are Squalidae rather than Squalus.--Rumping (talk) 12:20, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: They are in the family Squalidae, there is no need to restate the genus (Cirrhigaleus) as it is part of the specific name Cirrhigaleus asper.  It is not in the genus Squalus. GrahamBould (talk) 12:48, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That is my point.  The Spurdog article in effect says that spurdogs are a single genus Squalus.  The Roughskin spurdog is in a different genus, calling the statement in the article into question. --Rumping (talk) 10:57, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Squalidae v. Squalus

message: it's missing albifrons (used to be sp. B) chloroculus, crassispinus (used to be sp. D) edmundsi (used to be sp. C) grahami (used to be sp. F) hemipinnus, montabani, nasutus (used to be sp. E) sucklii (Puget Sound Dogfish) and sp. BW-A2282, sp. BW-A2283, and sp. BW-A2289  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.77.5.191 (talk) 01:02, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing species

message: Is little gulper shark in the genus Centrophorus or Squalus? There seem to references to both in Google searches. GrahamBould (talk) 19:11, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Genus
Talk:Squalicorax

message: Isn't corax latin for Raven rather than Crow? --Oskila (talk) 22:22, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Corvus is latin for a Crow/Raven/blackbird while Corax is the Greek for a Crow/Raven/blackbird.  The actual "vernacular" name to use more correctly raven then crow, yes.--Kevmin § 02:13, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  corax = raven? 

message: http://sciencepress.mnhn.fr/en/periodiques/geodiversitas/39/2/le-site-paleontologique-du-grand-morier-pont-boutard-indre-et-loire-france-contexte-geologique-et-detail-biostratigraphique-des-formations-cenozoiques-partir-des-assemblages-de-vertebres-fossiles--Bubblesorg (talk) 19:12, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Your link doesn't work and I'm pretty sure most editors here don't speak French. Lythronaxargestes (talk | contribs) 22:01, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I glanced over the paper, and, if one, i.e., you, , could be bothered to actually READ the paper, it states that eroded teeth of Squalicorax and other Cretaceous-aged shark genera are zombie taxa, having eroded out of their original matrix during the Miocene, and then reburied, which is actually dramatically different than being a Miocene record.--Mr Fink (talk) 01:19, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh so their reworked? That's pretty strange. Also, responding to the other statement guess yeah, most editors cant speak french. I used google translate--Bubblesorg (talk) 14:51, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The reworking of Cretaceous fossils into the formation is pointed out in the English abstract of the paper, you don't need to know French to understand that. Macrophyseter | talk 20:48, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A miocene record?
Talk:Stethacanthus

message: I notice Category:Prehistoric fish has been removed, leaving Category:Extinct fish. Isn't this losing information? The extinction could have taken place last year. At least Category:Prehistoric fish indicates that the extinction took place in prehistory. GrahamBould (talk) 09:37, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You're absolutely right. I'll change it back. Abyssal leviathin (talk) 11:59, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Category removal

message: Was it really only 70cm long? i have a book that puts it at 2m max. Spinodontosaurus (talk) 20:28, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lenth 

message: The "Etymology" section says that the name comes from "chest" and "thorn," which is correct, but then says that this refers to the anvil-shaped dorsal structure, which I think has to be incorrect as it is neither on the chest nor thorn-shaped. Stethacanthus *does* have two large chest spines, which I assume is where it derives its name. I believe that whoever wrote this just assumed that the anvil-like structure, which is what the species is visually known for, had to be what the name derived from and ignored the chest projections. 69.127.246.158 (talk) 22:22, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology
Talk:Swell shark

message: >> Sometimes they are caught by sport divers but they are not used.
WTF is this supposed to mean? Used? Something is lacking.
--Scnt2labor (talk) 02:33, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --– Sadalmelik ☎ 09:16, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 

message: Can someone clarify if it is swellshark or swellshark? Article seems to use both 132.239.112.44 (talk) 22:00, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Swellshark vs Swell shark
Talk:Scenario (computing)

message: Please discuss on Talk:User_scenario --Ronz 23:25, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with User scenario 

message: See the discussion there: Talk:Use case#Disambiguation: User story, Use case and Scenario, please. Franta Oashi (talk) 23:07, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation: User story, Use case and Scenario 

message: scenario about computer 136.158.44.1 (talk) 13:19, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Computer
Talk:Leopard shark

message: Triakis semifasciata → Leopard shark – Common english names are the standard for species. The current disambiguation page is not necessary - it can be dealt with by a  tag at the top of each of the pages Yomanganitalk 13:18, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
*Oppose - like so many common names, "leopard shark" is ambiguous, being used in Australia () and elsewhere () also for Stegostoma fasciatum. --Stemonitis 10:55, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: Add any additional comments
Page moved. Flowerparty☀ 02:08, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: What's the maximum size?  7 ft (2.12 m) or 71 inch (1.80 m)? Currently the article does contradict itself. --KnightMove (talk) 14:55, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maximum size? 

message: :Leopard shark (hound shark) → Leopard shark — The recent change of Leopard shark to a disambig page is unnecessary; the name "leopard shark" is really only used for two species, Triakis semifasciata and Stegostoma fasciatum, and the latter already has a perfectly good (and unique) name, zebra shark, whereas T. semifasciata is known as "leopard shark" worldwide. There's no ethnocentrism here, because everywhere that S. fasciatum is known as "leopard shark", "zebra shark" is also accepted as an alternate name. Yzx (talk) 10:07, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have taken the liberty of requesting the deletion of the disambig. page and reversing this rather odd move .  This is a speedier process than WP:RM. Rgrds. --Tombstone (talk) 16:52, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: I think the 'maximum range' of the shark needs to be updated. We seem to have them on the east coast of the Australia now. . Nford24 (PE121 Personnel Request Form) 05:13, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Maximum range

message: Please add class Vertebrata, see link: https://animaldiversity.org/accounts/Triakis_semifasciata/classification/
--Ͱερμες 12:20, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:Whitecheek shark

message: This article was based on the corresponding article at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, neither of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 05:18, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: I know you didn't make the range map, but I note from the IUCN red list page that the range includes areas around Australia, Indonesia, and the Philippines not in the map we have (though ours dates from a 2005 book). Chris857 (talk) 16:20, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I had noticed that. I'm not really into making range maps and even if I was, Australia is a big country and I don't expect the shark is found all round its coasts. Anyone amending the range map would need a good map to work from. Is a mostly accurate map better than no map at all, I wonder? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 17:51, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  update the range map
Talk:Whitenose shark

message: This article was based on the corresponding article at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, neither of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 05:12, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Winghead shark

message: "The wide spacing of its eyes grants superb binocular vision," The eyes face right and left.  It's vision NOT binocular, as the fields of vision do not intersect as binocular vision does.  No hammerhead(or other) shark has binocular vision. A shark(or any fish) with that kind of eyesight would be truly interesting.  There is no citation explaining why it's vision would be "superb". Please update.  (instructions not clear on exactly how or at what line to insert an edit request, so I'm winging it.  I'm cool with this being deleted after issue is reviewed). (something about tildes?)->  Mr Ekshin (talk) 12:48, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The body of the text has a reference to support the statement re: binocular vision, and states that it is the best of any hammerhead. I don't know if that means it is "superb" vision, but it does appear to be sourced. Primefac (talk) 14:51, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

text: It seems you are looking only at the summary at the top of the article. Further down, there is another referenced statement about binocular vision - mentioning an overlap of 48° - which matches the table 1 value in ref 13. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 14:57, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request
Talk:Xenacanthus

message: In the separate 'Xenacanthus' box a length is given.  As the box covers a genus, and not a particular species, surely length is not appropriate (unless all the species were the same length). GrahamBould (talk) 00:00, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Length

message: The information on this page seems invalid. I'm no expert, but I have seen full skeletons of Xenacanthus, indicating that it is not a shark. Also, Xenacanthus lives in the Cretaceous, not the Devonian! Can someone please make sure that this information is really, well, real? Paleo Kid (talk) 03:55, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The diagram shows a synonym of Xenacanthus, so what's the problem? FunkMonk (talk) 
18:41, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the information on this page valid? 

message: I noticed that there are overlapping species between this genera and Orthacanthus, namely
*X. (O.) compressus
*X. (O.) gibbosus
*X. (O.) gracillis
Could someone get to the bottom of this?
Weshawitz (talk) 00:59, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Over lap with Orthacanthus
Talk:Mid-South District of the Lutheran Church – Missouri Synod

message: I am removing the extended list of congregations & missions.  I certainly see the value of an article on a middle judicatory for a major american denomination, but not for the directory style list. Athanasius • Quicumque vult  18:51, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:NOTDIR]] 
Talk:Zboriv

message: I propose to move this article to its Ukrainian name. Google gives 20,800 for Zboriv, Ukraine, compaired with 2,360 for Zborov, Ukraine. Am bringing this up in case of any objections... —dima/s-ko/ 23:30, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --MapLover 00:16, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! BTW, thanks for starting on the city articles of each oblast. —dima/s-ko/ 02:13, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Zborov, Ukraine]] → [[Zboriv]]

message: For historical reasons, it does not make sense to remove Russian from the lead and infobox. michael60634 / talk / contributions 21:28, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Russian translation in the lead
Talk:Sega Visions

message: The magazine ran to at least Aug/Sep 1994, I have the issue. If anyone has or knows of a later issue, edit the date in the article.
68.63.241.215 (talk) 21:19, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Orange High School (North Carolina)

message: It seems to me that the complete later part of this article (Which was added by a student on Sept. 1, 2006) has nothing to do with the school itself. The attack should have its own article, just like the articles on Columbine High School and the tragedy that occured there. Also, the account should be heavily cleaned up to meet standards.--TuckJ 23:37, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

message: I've added some sources to this article so it is a bit more reliable.  It still needs some work in this area.  i kan reed 21:01, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources
Talk:Short-tail nurse shark

message: This article was based on the corresponding article at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, neither of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 06:05, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed