Talk:Lithuania/Archive 1

message: Sorry folks, Lithuania didn't join the NATO in 1999 as the article says but in 2004. :)
Regards, Muhamedmesic 08:38, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  NATO! 

message: Congratuliations to Wikipedia which employes the polish fascistes! I gratulate you with the best polish fascist propaganda in internet! Long live the rubbish Wikipedia!
:You can always discuss troubling parts here. And sure, bye! :) Domas Mituzas 14:30, 2005 Apr 1 (UTC)
Gerbiamas Domai, as ne karta padariau daugybe korekciju tekstuose apie Lietuva ir Vilniu, bet tas isgama slavas, sedintis administracijoje, ABSOLIUCIAI VISKA istryne ir vel atstate savo fasistini teksta. Nusiunciau skunda i centra, atsakymo dar negavau. Reikia kazka daryti, nes cia totaliai smeiziama Lietuva. Ka jus apie tai galvojate? 
Arturas
:Gal butu geriau jeigu ju PAAISKINTUMET jam, kodel jo klaidos yra klaidingos.  Jeigu jus, be jokio paaiskinimo, tiktai teksta keiciate ir vel taip pat keiciate, tai labai sunku atskirti jusu darba nuo chuliganizmo.  Man, asmeniskai, atrodo, kad butu zymiai geriau, kad ne tik tekstas butu teisingas, bet kad visi *suprastu*, kodel taip yra *teisingas* supratimas.
:Atsiminkite, kad wikipedija skaito daug kas, kurie nieko daug nezino apie Lietuva arba apie Lenkija.  Jiems atrodo, kad lietuviai ir lenkai cia be prasmes pesasi.  O jeigu lietuviai be paaiskinimo "taiso" teksta, ir raso piktus zodzius (pvz. ziurekite toliau, kur labai "trumpiai ir aiskiai" parasyta), tai visam pasauliui atrodo, kad lenkai tikriausiai tiesus.  Atrodo, kad mes izdyke vaikai, o jie mus taiso.
:Atiprasau, kad as ne labai teisyklingai rasau lietuviu kalba.  As lietuvis, bet uzauges, visus mokslus isejes, ir dirbu Kanadoje anglu kalba naudojamas. Ifdef 13:52, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Congratulations to Wikipedia 

message: Slaves - to gas chambers.
:What is written above is indeed very short and very clear, and also extremely offensive. I am embarrassed that someone, presumably from the country of my ancestors, would write such a thing.  Not only write it, but keep putting it back after I try to clean it up.  This is the work of hooligans, not people who are seriously trying to put forward a point of view.  Is this how you usually try to solve your disagreements with other people?Ifdef 13:36, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Ifdef, if you can, please refrain fro discussing with vandal who calls people nazis and sending them to gas chambers. It'll make removal/archiving of his offensive edits easier without any collateral damage. Just ignore him if you can. Many thanks. Lysy 15:53, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Very short and very clear 

message: Dear "friends",
Why do you still openly falsificate history? Its retoric question, because I very good know WHY.
:Yes, because monkeys, slaves and administrators intend to invade Lithuania.
1) Lithuania didn't recognize the occupation of capital Vilnius in 1938. It only contracted the diplomatic relations with Poland after the Polish ultimatum of assault to begin war.
Kaunas was the temporary capital from October 9, 1920 (when Polish army craftily, perjured all international treaties occupied Lithuanian capital) to October 28, 1939 (when Lithuanian Army after 19 years of terrible occupation entered Vilnius).
:Actually it was Lithuania, not Poland, who refused to cease the war as long as until December 1927. Eventually Voldemaras had to agree for peace when pressed by Pilsudski during the League of Nations meeting in Geneva. What do you mean by "terrible occupation" ?
2) The Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth was in force from 1569 (Lublin union) to 1795 (third partition of the Commonwealth). As you have to know, the Gardinas (Grodno - polish) seimas (sejm) abolished all decisions of constitution of May 3, 1791. But even in the time when the constitution of May 3, 1791 was in force, was bill the "Act of Guarantees of Both Nations" (Zareczenie Obojga Narodow), which guarantied the continuation of Commonwealth.
:Do you have any credible sources to back your claims here ?
3) The Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth was CONFEDERATION - different teritories, different armies, different law, different officials, different capitals ectr.
:Please read what confederation is first. Then check out the organizational structure and administrative system of the Commonwealth in Offices in Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth article.
4) Duke Mindaugas (and earlier his father) united in one state ONLY Lithuanian dukes. And already the established Lithuanian state later annexed the slavic teritories (formerly Baltic Lands) and established the great medieval Empire on the rule of Lithuanians.
:Actually, Lithuania in 12th century was quite small and hard to call an empire. As to the later multi-ethnic character of the duchy you'd have to ask Ukrainians or Belorusians about it.
P.S. IF YOU WILL CONTINUE TO FALSIFICATE OUR HISTORY AND CONTINUE TO ERASE ALL CORRECTIONS, I WILL FORCE TO CONTINUE MY TACTIC. WE WILL SEE WHO WILL WIN.
:Oops, for a minute I thought you were serious. Lysy 07:18, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  to polish chauvinistes - "administrators" 

message: Please Add this Arabic interwiki to the source:
ar:ليتوانيا
Regards,
--Oxydo 11:46, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  interwiki