Talk:Pibb Xtra

message: I've added a citation to the first line about mr pibb competing with dr pepper. Apparently when coca-cola first released mr. pibb, they had a "mr. pibb challenge".  In the article from 1973, "That was W.W. Clements, the balding, genial, Dr. Pepper-swigging president of the company...mouths nothing but the friendliest of words for the Coca-Cola company and their Mr. Pibb challenge. "Better to let sleeping dogs lie," President Clements says softly. 'Our sales have actually improved since Mr. Pibb came along.'" Brtw2 (talk) 07:27, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Pibb vs Dr Pepper

message: According to the article, it's only been released in Texas, Oklahoma, and Kansas.  It's now available in Missouri.  Does anyone know, has it been released nationwide, or is it just available in Missouri, or even in southwest Missouri? -Rt66lt 00:12, September 7, 2005 (UTC)
it is also in Louisiana Jude86 06:17, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pibb Zero 

message: What happened to the humorous sentence about "Though the video Lazy Sunday suggests that Mr. Pibb + Red Vines = crazy delicious, this hypothesis has not been confirmed. Further study has been promised"? I found that very amusing and am extremely disappointed to see that someone has callously removed it.
In general, I've noticed the wikipedia snobs don't like humor, no matter how light or funny, in their pages, unless it is a direct fact that might happen to be funny.
* I hate to be a downer but, Wikipedia articles aren't about humour, they're about appropriate, informative information about various topics that can be of assistance to people. ----ARandomHeretic UTC 02:41 2 November 2006
: Is it OK if I'm an upper and a downer? -- 
If you want humor, go to urbandictionary.  Wikipedia is about information.  Do you see jokes in the World Book? --AMFilmsInc (and, Action) 04:35, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  careless editing 

message: :Image:Pibb Xtra.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:18, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Pibb Xtra.jpg

message: Back in the 90's I noticed this on not only a Mr. Pibb can, but other Coke products as well. Being a curious geek, I even wrote up a study of it using Excel.
I'll not bore you with the dry analysis, but the end result was that by using a 30 faceted can they saved a small amount of aluminum in each. My computations  showed an 'extra' can being available for every 600 or cans produced.
I have sent an inquiry to Coca-Cola asking for confirmation of their existence and the reasoning.
Ha ha, awesome. --AMFilmsInc (and, Action) 04:36, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coke cans with faceted sides 

message: The article states that some people think Mr. Pibb is better than Dr. Pepper, however, there is no opposing viewpoint.NodPilot42 21:42, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV? 

message: I am going to wait a week, and then I will come back and nuke any unsourced statements in the trivia section, and incorporate the survivors into the main article. There is a ton of unreferenced pop-culture drivel in this article (more than half the article is composed of the trivia section) and none of it adds anything to the article or to Wikipedia. Horologium t-c 15:43, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia section 

message: Odd, I'm in the midwest (Wisconsin), and we serve Pibb Xtra at work... but can't buy it at Wal-Mart. Dammit.  To make matters worse, nobody bothers to brix the soda properly so it always tastes flat.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.168.71.168 (talk) 04:25, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Huh 

message: Could someone PLEASE give this a new rating, i have done significant work to improve the quality of this article and would like it to be updated to start status. Thank You!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.126.219.2 (talk) 01:34, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: RATING PLEASE

message: There appears to be a typo on the page:
"More data is needed to access whether this marketing strategy worked."
I'm pretty sure that word is supposed to be 'assess' and not 'access', but every time I change it it gets reverted back and I get a message accusing me of vandalizing the article. But 'assess' isn't a dirty word, honest! 74.137.166.161 (talk) 02:02, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typo 

message: Is Mr. PiBB considered a "cola" as labeled in the article?  Dr. Pepper isn't considered to be a cola in the Dr. Paper article.  Do the ingredients contain kola nuts? 75.27.239.112 (talk) 03:09, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Cola?

message: That is a typo and I will try and get that fixed, thanks for youre time on that. Also I think the cola reference is just used to describe any soda that isnt a fruit flavor, but ill research that. Thanks.
I seem to recall and advertising campaign (in the UK) that explicitly stated that Dr Pepper was NOT a cola. I guess Mr Pibb therefore cannot be considered to be a cola, since it is main rival to Dr Pepper.
Just as a point of interest, is Mr Pibb caffientated? Maybe that's what qualifies it as a cola, if so...
82.5.68.95 (talk) 12:36, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typo and Cola 

message: "In 2000, there was a guy with the last name Pibb. He hated that there was a soft drink with his name. He was not fond of the soft drink so he sued the company and won. Therefore, a year later the company had to change the name to Pibb Xtra and add additional flavors to have a believable reason for changing the name."
This is uncited and written in an unprofessional way. I'm removing the sentence. Whoever originally added it is encouraged to try again. Sarcen1174 (talk) 22:58, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The "guy" who hated Mr. Pibb? 

message: This article talk page was automatically added with  banner as it falls under :Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 23:08, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:FOOD|WikiProject Food and drink]] Tagging

message: I've change the article to use "Pibb", but the BB version exists even here on the talk page. What's up with that, what's proper and why? Perhaps the article should state? LilHelpa (talk) 16:41, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The cans and logo for "Mr. Pibb" alternately used "PiBB" and "PIBB". That's not a reason to consider either an "official" spelling instead of "Pibb" (and "Pibb Xtra" has no funny capitalization), but that's probably why someone decided to type it that way on Wikipedia. --64.149.36.182 (talk) 06:21, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: PiBB or Pibb and why?

message: it says mr. pibb has 23 flavors, the source it cites doesn't say that. and the only other places I see that obviously copied off of this article. I know dr. pepper has 23 flavors, this is too much of a coincidence, so I am removing it. 67.176.160.47 (talk) 19:35, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  23 flavors 

message: The Mariana Islands are a part of the United States. Guam is a United States Territory and the Northern Mariana Islands are a United States Commonwealth. Saying that the soda is sold "in the United States and the Mariana Islands" sounds utterly moronic, similar to saying "the United States and New England." 
It comes off as shoddy and amateur and should be removed or changed to, "the United States including the Mariana Islands."
210.23.84.66 (talk) 12:48, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Um...did you mean American Samoa? 216.96.138.233 (talk) 17:37, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mariana Islands 

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 8 January 2012 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 07:59, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Pibb Xtra Pibb Zero.jpg Nominated for Deletion

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 21:02, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Xtra.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:46, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Pibb Xtra Title.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 17:11, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Pibb Xtra Soda.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: This link, used in the first footnote, no longer leads to any article: http://www.texasmonthly.com/1973-02-01/business.php  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.162.1.16 (talk) 14:05, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Footnote link from Texas Monthly newspaper / magazine no longer available