lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Zeroth-order logic

message: I propose to merge Zeroth-order logic into Propositional calculus. I think that the content in the Zeroth-order logic article can easily be explained in the context of Propositional calculus, given that it is a synonym of propositional calculus, and the propositional calculus article is of a reasonable size that the merging of zeroth order logic will not cause any problems as far as article size is concerned. KazMalKen (talk) 20:30, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: Jon Awbrey 18:56, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes & Queries
Talk:Music of Brisbane

message: Why was this turned into a disambiguation page? Tuf-Kat 11:10, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Because people have been continually vandalising the page.  This was the only way I could think to stop the rot.  Also, the information was also available on the other two pages. Figaro 11:42, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It was most likely one person who was active for a couple days with an IP address that changed, then he stopped and somebody else vandalized twice which you reverted, all over a period of five months.  That's not really a lot of vandalism at all.  And I'm pretty sure music of Brisbane is a lot more wiki-standard than Popular entertainment in Brisbane and Classical culture of Brisbane, both of which are based around somewhat nebulous topics. Tuf-Kat 01:54, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A new article, Brisbane's music history, appears to be redundant, and should be merged here. --mtz206 (talk) 22:27, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've just redirected it here. There doesn't appear to be anything there worth moving over. Fagstein 01:31, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Brisbane's music history]]
Talk:F-term (patent law)

message: This sentence is grammatically weird: "It is identified by the title describes the range or the theme-code consists of five digits (...)". Something may be missing. Please help correcting it. --Edcolins 19:03, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think I've fixed it, and hopefully improved the whole document. Kcordina 14:21, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. Great! --Edcolins 15:14, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weird sentence 

message: The links to F-Term lists are either broken or the lists are no longer available at the linked pages.Simonox 02:52, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your message. I have tagged the article for now. --Edcolins 15:04, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead Links to the F-Term Lists
Talk:Governor of New Jersey

message: I made an edit concerning the statement that governor was the only state-wide elected office.  Technically, it is the only one for a position in the state government; however, United States Senator is an office that is elected by the entire state, and as such, is a state-wide elected office.  I tried to edit the article to make it pretty clear.
:I was trying to emphasize the fact that the Governor is the only state-wide, state-level position. I changed your wording to remove the Senators (it's true, but not relevant re state government) and clarify that we're talking about state level posts. This page was create as part of Wikiproject New Jersey, which is aimed at filling the holes and expanding the details on Wikipedia regarding New Jersey. We could use more participants, if you're interested. (FYI: use four tildes (~~~~) to add your "signature" after any comments on discussion pages). Alansohn 04:16, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: State-Wide Office

message: As a purely hypothetical exercise...If the legislation dropping "acting" from the title of any acting governor who serves for than 6 months had existed previously, would Codey's title have been "Governor" back in November 2004 when he first assumed the position because it was expected that he would have served for 14 months? Or, would he have only been able to change his title after he had served the 6 months required by the law (just in case for whatever reason he served less than 6 months)??? Unfortunately (or fortunately), this will never arise due to the 2 provisions of the Constitutional Amendment: Lieutenant Governor starting in 2010 and new succession rules between now and then. Any thoughts???
:As I understood it (and reflected this understanding in the article), it would only take effect After six months had transpired. Remember that there are multiple reasons that may have caused Codey to leave office before the six months elapsed, even if it was expected to last far longer. Alansohn 23:18, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  When does the "acting" get dropped? 

message: I added in a Current cabinet section, syntax modeled after the U.S. cabinet's page.  Ideally the departments would be ordered by date of creation, but I can't find the dates for all of them.  Secretary of State and Attorney General should definitely be first because those are required by the Constitution. Aki Mononoke (talk) 04:44, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Current cabinet
Talk:Prosecutor General of Ukraine

message: Shouldn't the article be about the Office of the Prosecutor General of Ukraine, instead of its Head? Ukrained 19:16, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

message: Please update this article: in July 2022 Iryna Venediktova was removed from her position as Prosecutor General of Ukraine, and Deputy Prosecutor General Oleksii Symonenko was appointed the acting Prosecutor General. 173.88.246.138 (talk) 19:53, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update
Talk:Copper (comic)

message: The site seems to be down now. Anyone know why?
:Seems to be up now. Root4(one) 07:17, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Down? 

message: The comic appears to have been on hiatus for a while.  As I don't have much free time left right now, I can't do any more research on the topic.  Would anybody mind doing it? Root4(one) 14:18, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hiatus?
Talk:Governor General's Foot Guards

message: Just a correction, the "Second World War–era German MG42" is not actually an MG42. 
During a visit in the Museum I was corrected and told that it was in fact, not an MG42. I will not change the article until I actually go back to the Museum and read the panel again myself. 74.56.236.154 03:44, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

message: Though it looks like they are standing in front of Parliament the cuff frogging is different from a Guards regiment and there is no red plume.  Is it possible it is of the 10th Royal Grenadiers or the Vandoos?Foofbun (talk) 07:41, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point: most of the soldiers are wearing line-infantry tunics, which combined with the bearskins make them look like fusiliers or R22eR (which wears fusilier uniforms because of the alliance with the Welch Fusiliers). However, fusiliers wear a cap badge on their bearskins, and there aren't any cap badges in the picture. And also, the colour party and the officer next to His Excellency are wearing guards tunics with buttons in twos -- only GGFG has worn this tunic in Canada. So maybe there was a shortage of guards tunics and the were making do with line-infantry tunics? Or maybe this is a composite formation? Indefatigable (talk) 17:27, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Is the 1927 photo really one of the GGFG?
Talk:Organizing model

message: I am going to be editing this page as a class assignment. I hope to make some good improvements and make the article even better quality than it already is. There is definitely some more useful information that can be added and some changes to the existing layout that will improve the quality of the article. If anyone knows how the current information is being cited, I would appreciate that info. I want to make sure I carefully document my own sources, but I want to integrate my citations with the current ones (for the existing info). Thanks.Kelley.thompson12 (talk) 11:58, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It seems to me that the second and third paragraphs in this section are a little off topic. They seem to discuss the general history of Australian Labour rather than the history of the Organising model. It is all related, of course, but could perhaps be focused a little better. --Bookandcoffee 21:27, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: History in Australia

message: perhaps in the united states vs. uk/other anglo nations, i think the "service model" in opposition to the "organizing model" has a different meaning.  here in the US, the image of the "service model" is that of a "business agent" mainly returning phone calls to members about grievances and what not, hence "servicing" the collective bargaining agreement; i think it seems in the UK the "servicing" might mean something different, like a host of legal benefits for members or something.  thoughts? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.65.204.205 (talk • contribs)  
:No, the meanings are similar on both sides of the Atlantic. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.203.146.180 (talk • contribs) 
:I agree, the "service model" involves both of the aspects described, where the members are seen as passive recipients of the union's services, both locally and at a national level; rather than as the active participants of the organizing-model union. --Orange Mike  | Talk 17:10, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: US vs. uk/aust. terminology

message: "Carter and Cooper believe that the organizing model is rather limited in terms of its scale, and it cannot start a "...wider working class movement."[8]"
This is misleading. In Carter and Cooper's cited piece, they write: "Some critics have suggested that the organizing  model  has  its  limitations:  for  instance  it  has  been  suggested  that  the model’s focus upon mobilization makes it insufficient for building a wider working  class  movement  (Fletcher and Hurd 2000)"
The Fletcher and Hurd piece cited can be found here, called "Is Organizing Enough? Race, Gender, and Union Culture": http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/articles/316/
In other words, it is not Carter and Cooper's opinion. It is Fletcher and Hurd's opinion which Carter and Cooper refer to in their article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.173.25.169 (talk) 05:36, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs fix
Talk:Afrirampo

message: Can someone verify this?  According to  they hooked up in 2002.  IMHO they don't look alike, and several of the articles that call them sisters look like they might not mean "sisters" in the familial sense.  I'm going to edit out the "sisters" reference in the article and send them an email.  In the meantime feel free to correct this if I have made a mistake.  EyeMessiah--supermoon@yokozuna.co.jp
I see that a lot of articles refer to them as sisters, but only in a very offhand manner, and for some reason I'm still not convinced.  There official site doesn't mention it at all, but thats not entirely surprising.  Lets say I get an email response from them saying that they aren't sisters should we still defer to the numerous articles? EyeMessiah194.217.48.150 15:59, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  '''Are they really sisters?''' 

message: This website (http://samanthaculp.com/2005/11/naked-rock-afrirampos/) lists their full names as Pikachu Yasashii and Oni Beppin. Of course it is very unlikely that that Pikachu is Pikachu's real name, or even that Oni is Oni's real name (I think Oni means demon in japanese), but it is likely that the names Yasashii and Beppin are real (most likely family names). So I think I will put these names in brackets next to their psuedenoms. But if you disagree with this decission feel free to correct it.--P-we Joplin (talk) 12:08, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: '''Names'''
Talk:Bipolar disorder support groups

message: This is a separate subject, and as such should be a separate page.  Additionally, it will greatly shorten the bipolar disorder article, which is already ridiculously long.  If a link to this page is included on the bipolar disorder page, I think the original article will find itself greatly improved, and people with bipolar disorder can seek their needed resource here.  As a side note, I'm a mental health professional and I'm currently trying to edit the bipolar disorder article so that it is helpful and readable.  The old page made me want to cry in frustration.  I don't, by the way, have bipolar disorder. user:NoLightofMyOwn
Wikipedia is not merely a collection of links WP:NOT. This article should be deleted. Barrylb 15:37, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Please quickly expand the article as proposed, User: NoLightofMyOwn, or move the list of links to the external link section of the bipolar disorder article.  Without content, this wikipage should be deleted. It can be re-created when someone is ready to contribute some content. -- PFHLai 16:04, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  The links do not belong on the bipolar disorder page either, which I have just cleaned up and linked to a directory instead. The whole point of this page seems to be for a collection of links. I don't see any future in it. Barrylb 16:12, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've posted a note on User talk:NoLightofMyOwn. If this editor doesn't return and expand the article in a week or so, please remind me (or get any admin) to delete it. Thanks. -- PFHLai 16:30, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food

message: Canada has a "Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food"?  What in the world is "agri-food"?  And what, pray tell, is the difference between agriculture and agri-food?  Save, us, please.  Madman 20:15, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Agri-Food??

message: Spraying crops before harvest:. As the honorable minister is from PEI, he may not be aware that farmers are spraying their crops before harvesting their grain. They use a product that is similar to Round up to dry the grain. This leaves some residual dangerous chemicals on the grain. As well it must be dangerous for farmers. Europe does not accept this practice as I try to eat only bio grains I try to avoid this risque. However most Canadiens are not aware of this practice. Chemical companies promote this costly practice,,, it must stop. As well it will start to prevent export of Canadian grain! 184.144.201.15 (talk) 15:09, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spraying crops before harvest:.
Talk:Carbodiimide

message: Does anyone have an idea why a carbodiimide is not called a carbodiimine? The structure would suggest the latter, not?
Pourrais-je avoir le mécanisme complet de la formation d'un amide par le carbodiimide? c'est important et urgent. 
Merci d'avance
1. I don't think that DCC decomposes at 34 degrees? That would really make it very unstable, no?
2. Le mecanisme est la! regarde! Sikkema 15:06, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Doctor Fun

message: As far as I can determine, Where the Buffalo Roam was the first comic published on the Internet (Usenet, specifically), while Doctor Fun was the first comic published on the actual Web. The author himself says (http://www.ibiblio.org/Dave/bye.html) that Argon Zark was the first "Web cartoon", but he appears to mean "first comic designed for the Web", as opposed to "first comic published on the Web".
In any case, several sources seem to be confused about the difference between the Net and the Web (and pre-Web services like CompuServe), so please double-check before changing that bit. Phasma Felis (talk) 08:55, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: "First on the Web" vs. "First on the Internet"

message: I'm going to be looking for more sources in order to update this article. Below I will write what searches I have done, as a record to myself and to let future writers know what has already been mined.
Google: "doctor fun" comic; "doctor fun" comic reviews; "doctor fun" comic analysis; "doctor fun" comic opinions. 
Specific sites (using their search engines for search for "doctor fun"): The Beat, Bleeding Cool, The Booklist Reader, CBR, The Comics Journal, Digital Strips, Fleen, io9/Gizmodo, Lambiek's Comiclopedia
HenryCrun15 (talk) 21:57, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Search records
Talk:Dork Tower

message: I think that the part saying that Matt is the first character should be removed.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.193.129.99 (talk) 03:02, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Main Character

message: I have removed the in-universe tag as I think the descriptions of characters provide sufficient context already, and are not overly long or detailed.  --Craw-daddy | T | 18:49, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. — Mudwater 20:57, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: In universe

message: I think the Spanish page is offline. Should it be removed from the links list?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.10.54.219 (talk) 20:34, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Spanish page
Template talk:User Irish

message: I suggest we change this icon to something that covers the entire island (eg outline map), as currently it has the flag of the rebublic. See also Template talk:User_Ireland for renaming of that to cover just the rebublic, in line with the userboxes for wales,ni,england,scotland. MartinRe 12:47, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree we need something more inclusive, but I've removed the flag that was theresince having the banner of one not particularly pleasant branch of the Anglo-Norman nobility, which was responsible for a lot of trouble and mayhem in Tudor Ireland (see Desmond Rebellions, for instance - responsible for a lot of problems for my Corcaigh ancestors) is if anything more divisive. I've replaced it with the image from  (a shamrock leaf)... another option would be the map that's on . Grutness...wha? 12:20, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, I much prefer the shamrock, and that's the sort of symbol that people with Irish ancestry would associate with Ireland, imo. Good choice! MartinRe 12:50, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

text: I have to disagree about the cross being connected with St. Patrick in anything other than name. As a member of FOTW and a vexillologist I can tell you that there's been extensive research on the red saltire, and it dates only to its use as a banner by the Fitzgeralds. No actual banner was ever associated with Patrick prior to that time, and he was always symbolised just by the shamrock. Grutness...wha? 00:12, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Icon change

message: 4 Leaf Clovers aren't a representation of Irishness.  They are a symbol of luck.  People get this confused because the 3 leaf clover is a symbol of Ireland.  Saint Patrick used a three leaf clover to explain the Trinity to the Druids...Father, Son, and Holy Ghost.  That symbol represents Irish Christianity, and St. Patrick (the patron Saint).  That's why on St. Paddy's day clovers are abundant...however, the 4 leaf variety is wholey unrelated to this topic.  4 leaf clovers represent luck...that's it.  So, let's not help spread more misconception and use a 4 leaf clover to express our being Irish.
Please read the article entitled Shamrock for further evaluation of this topic.
Rowlan 17:29, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Your image is much nicer, anyway. --robz0r 21:13, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Good call Rowlan. --Mal 02:52, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 4 Leaf Clover Unacceptable

message: Please see Template talk:User ancestry Irish (so the discussion only happens in one place) Nat 14:39, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change "This user is of Irish ancestry" to "This user is Irish"
Talk:Oregon Vietnam Veterans Memorial

message: Not sure if the stub links for Vietnam as well as architecture are appropriate.  Hopefully someone will fill in or remove as appropriate.  —EncMstr 20:29, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: The Portland Parks web page about the memorial calls it the "Vietnam Veterans of Oregon Memorial" as do some other web pages.  However, I am not going to move it because there are pages, besides wiki mirrors and including one from Ron Wyden's office, that call it the "Oregon Vietnam Veterans Memorial". --Jason McHuff 04:41, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Have a look at this photo:  It has yet another name. I think google counts were used in chosing the name.  I should have documented it though.  Thanks for checking.  — EncMstr 04:47, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name 

message: I am a current member of the American Legion in Independence Oregon. There is a monument in our city that was dedicated July 4, 1982 and this predates by five years the monument listed in Portland as being the first in the state to honor service members of the Vietnam War. This July 4 will have a ceremony to commemorate forty years of the monument here in Independence. I will be putting together an article noting the history of our Vietnam Veterans Memorial soon, but wanted to make the comment along with the photograph of our monument to add in this talk concerning this article.
  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Whitebloom48 (talk • contribs) 16:06, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  This memorial is  not the first in the state of Oregon
Talk:Decet Romanum Pontificem

message: I changed the link that said On the Roman Catholic Church lifting the excommunication of Martin Luther to On the lifting the excommunication of Martin Luther by a Priest of the Society of Saint Pius X.  The reason I did this was because the statement was made by a priest of the Society of Saint Pius X.  I'm not sure about the current status of the society in the larger Catholic church - but my understanding is that it still is seperated from the larger church.  So I think it's more accurate to say that this is a position of the SSPX.  If someone does know of an official document of the church from a source such as the Vatican then I hope they'd put a link to that in this article.
JesseG 20:33, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Lifting of the Excommunication

message: I have restored the quotation from Roland Bainton that an anonymous editor has removed. Since this paragraph discusses whether or not to lift the papal excommunication of Luther the quotation from one of the most famous of contemporary Luther biographers regarding this matter is relevant and significant. Bainton gives his historical judgment relative to Luther's being excommunicated. drboisclair 19:34, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Views of [[Roland Bainton]]

message: I added this source and a snippet from it because the idea that the Church is considering rehabilitating Luther is groundless.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.115.104.2 (talk) 02:12, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Catholic News Link
Talk:Earthsong

message: What's with the theme songs? I haven't seen them anywhere else.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.63.95.177 (talk) 11:37, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: They are the theme songs that each character has. They represent various aspects of each characters personaly, and various aspects of their lives while on Earthsong. This used to be included on the website under character information untill recently. I don't know why it was taken off.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.172.22.31 (talk) 00:56, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Theme songs?
Talk:Siemens star

message: Is it a Siemens star, or Siemens' star? As the article stands, the first sentence is not grammatically correct.--Srleffler 20:38, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

message: is A=D/100 Area = Diameter/100 as there is 100 spokes on the one in the picture? --217.43.11.102 19:16, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  formula
Talk:The Other Me (2000 film)

message: This page, if you look at the "What Links Here", is apparently about a Disney TV movie.  --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 21:02, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

message: The plot section of the article was in pretty bad shape so I gave it a bit of a copyedit.  Could someone who has seen this film give it more of tune-up?¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 07:59, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot Section Needs Quite a Bit of Help