Talk:Large Stone Structure

message: It occurs to me that this would be a useful article to have at this point, to compare with the recently discovered archaeological site.  Is anyone up to writing something?  Just click Palace of David and start.  Thanks.--Pharos 23:27, 6 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually I think it would be detrimental to have two articles. See my comment above; the archaeological findings have no other more appropriate place than a general Palace of David article. --Dhartung | Talk 05:48, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, the thing is that the site is of major significance whether or not it actually is the Palace of David; it's a distinct topic.--Pharos 06:02, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Pharos is right, there needs to be a distinct article for the Palace of David.  I vote for moving this page to "Palace of David" and put recent archaeological findings in a subcategory. FranksValli 08:13, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article on Palace of David as described in the Bible 

message: I want to move this page to Palace of David and have the current archaeological information in a subcategory.  Anyone have any objections?  FranksValli 03:25, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, oh - I misunderstood your comments above.  Ok, let's not move this article.  But instead create the Palace of David main article as you suggest, and use info from this Alleged Palace of David article for a small conjectural subsection.  FranksValli 09:56, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moving This Page 

message: This find certainly deserves enormous inspection and research, as it has some potential of becoming a significant biblical discovery (perhaps the greatest yet). But I think it is quite a stretch to identify it as king David's palace so far, considering only one tenth of the place has been reliably uncovered.
There were many different palaces and temples built during this time period, and just because you find one, it doesn't mean it is King David's. Similarly, if archaeologists hypotheticaly uncovered the skeleton of a 10th century 7 ft Canaanite warrior, it doesn't mean this was Goliath.
I What is equally as interesting to me is the Jehucal seal finding, if this can indeed be identified with the same character mentioned in the bible.--207.225.65.89 09:31, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  King David's palace? 

message: I think the seal of Jehucal might deserve its own article as it is sort of independent and different from the general building. It is also a very significant artifact. Does anyone else agree or disagree? Basar 20:48, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seal of Jehucal 

message: I'm thinking that we should probably move this to Large-Stone Structure, as that is what Mazar has now decided to call it.  I would feel better, of course, if we could also have a Palace of David  article on traditional ideas to complement it.--Pharos 02:48, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The obvious solution is to make an article about David's Palace called King David's Palace and then include this possible find as a section. Any objections ? Amoruso 00:08, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Within the last month Dr. Mazar announced she had found a wall of Solomon's Temple. Whether it's a temple wall or not, it's likely the most significant structure ever found from that period. However her identification of her previous discovery with King David's Palace is considered controversial by other archaeologists. Therefore I recommend waiting to read what other archaeologists make of her most recent discovery before characterizing it. Chrisbak 20:56, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What we should do, and I have done is added the qualified, and moved it to Large Stone Structure (Jerusalem) after the pattern of  Broad Wall (Jerusalem) See the related new article 10th-century city wall, Jerusalem, which also needs a name change. We can't do it to City wall, Jerusalem because there were later walls (such as the 8th century BCE Broad Wall). Suggestions for that one welcome on the talk page there.    DGG ( talk ) 15:51, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed move 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Large Stone Structure. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070120125149/http://www.momentmag.com/olam/Apr06/MOM-2006-04_mazar.html to http://www.momentmag.com/olam/Apr06/MOM-2006-04_mazar.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:45, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Large Stone Structure. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060115093054/http://www.news24.com/News24/Technology/News/0,,2-13-1443_1749790,00.html to http://www.news24.com/News24/Technology/News/0,,2-13-1443_1749790,00.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:04, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified