lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Paul Street Boys

message: ==11-year-old schoolboy== ha ha qe ti qa bone
While the novel can be easily read in most parts of the world as its story could have happened anywhere and in any age, an 11-year-old Hungarian schoolboy, Dani Bodnar, in 2006 describes the self-sacrifice of Ernő Nemecsek in a school essay this way: "I was very sick. I was thinking about why we had to fight for the grund. Because it was our country, our playing ground, for which we must fight even if we are in fever. Because that's what the grund was for us, our country."
Where on earth did this quote come from??? Is this some WP user's kid writing? There are surely many better quotes out there, from literary scholars et al. I really don't think it's necessary to quote an 11-year-old schoolboy - especially not on a novel that is as famous as this one! Lumendelumine 16:54, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

message: Why on earth are terms given in German????? E.g. Grund etc!!!!!!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.12.102.4 (talk) 23:05, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  German 

message: The long quote attributed to Haim Baram does not appear in the linked source (in Hebrew) nor anywhere else in the linked web site. The link is to an article by another writer, to which Baram responds, mentioning the book, but without the quoted praise to the character Nemecek. I could not find any other source for this quote. Baram and others from his family (which includes several Israeli prominent writers and politicians) have expresses affection to the book on several occasions, but that does not have encyclopedic value. Consider removing this part. Laugh Tough (talk) 09:40, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questionable quote in "Literary significance and criticism"
Talk:Quinta das Lágrimas

message: I have askedUser:Ebyabe to create an IPPAR infobox. Once it is done it will be put there and a picture added.Galf 12:34, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ransom theory of atonement

message: An editor wants to provide the views of the ransom of Seventh-day Adventists and Jehovah's Witnesses as separate sections, although both groups have exactly the same view on the matter, both being derived from their common Adventist origins. The editor's changes constitute undue weight to the separate groups. Since Gabby Merger has indicated at my User Talk page that she mistakenly believe I am victimising her, can other editors please provide input. Thanks.--Jeffro77 (talk) 02:47, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adventists 

message: Description of the 'ransom' as a 'theory' is almost certainly misleading, especially in the context of the branch of Christians who subscribe to creationism and very frequently misuse the term 'theory' in reference to evolution. Since the claims about the 'atonement' are supernatural and hence untestable, the concept barely constitutes a hypothesis, let alone a theory.--Jeffro77 (talk) 05:40, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Theory? 

message: * Mary Curtis Webb Ideas and images in twelfth century sculpture , https://lib.ugent.be/fulltxt/RUG01/001/879/684/RUG01-001879684_2012_0001_AC.pdf, privately published (2012)
- ransom theory in English Norman church sculpture. Johnbod (talk) 15:07, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed from an art page, but relevant here
Talk:Dicyemida

message: This page should include the number of species in the phylum.  --Savant13 17:50, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of Species 

message: Access Science from McGraw-Hill
nice photo of one, showing all cell nuclei
uottawa.ca, drawing
shows vermiform larvae --Abd (talk) 02:08, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links to images of Rhombozoa 

message: Anyone able to clear up the nomenclature?  The taxobox information doesn't match what's stated on the page.  The page states:  the name "Dicyemida" precedes "Rhombozoa" in usage, and is preferred by most contemporary authors.  It doesn't specifically discuss discovery and naming.  However, the taxobox gives both Krohn 1839 and van Beneden 1876 separately as authorities - only van Beneden shows as that copy of the parameter appears later in the template.  I've tracked down Krohn's citation to Krohn, A. 1839. Uber das Vorkommen von Entozoen und Krystallablagerungen in den schwammigen Venenanhängen einiger Cephalopoden. "Neue Notizen aus dem Gebiet der Natur- und Heilkunde" 11 :213-216 and taken a look at it.  I couldn't find any sign of a name, only a description.  It's possible that Kölliker 1882 is the origin of the name - ITIS notes it for an order Dicyemida and van Beneden 1876 refers to it (Bulletins de L'Acadèmie Royale des Sciences, des Lettres et des Beaux-Arts de Belgique, ser. 2, vol. 41, here on p1160) as his name.  The Kölliker work cited is Albert Kölliker "über Dicyema paradoxum der Schmarotzer der Venenanhänge der Cephalopoden".  Berichte von der Königlichen Zootomischen Anstalt zu Würzburg 2. Ber., 4849, p. 59.
Things I haven't been able to track down: whether Kölliker is actually the source of the name; when and where Rhombozoa comes into the picture.  Any info would be useful. -- Shimmin Beg (talk) 19:45, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Naming and name sources

message: Isn't Dicyemida an order instead of a phylum?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by LukaBE (talk • contribs) 15:58, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Recent academic papers seem consistent in considering it a phylum. Have a look at https://scholar.google.com/scholar?as_ylo=2014&q=dicyemida&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5 for a sample.--cyclopiaspeak! 18:39, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Order?
Talk:List of United States Navy aircraft wings

message: Hi. I would not put the tailcodes in the page, since they are due to change. CVG/CVW-10 had the tailcode "AK" which was given to CVW-13 in the 80s. In 1986 the short-lived CVW-10 got "NM", previously CVW-21. It is also not correct that "A" was always for the Atlantic Fleet and "N" for the Pacific Fleet. Mostly, but CVW-16 was a PAC unit, tailcode "AH".
I would also put the air groups/wings in one file that are related to each other. See: http://www.history.navy.mil/download/history/app15.pdf --cobatfor 23:14h, 21 Sep 2007 (GMT)
::You are all correct save for CVW-21's fin flash, which was "NP". Yes CVW-16 was a pacific fleet unit with the "AH" fin flash, and btw had the dubious distinction of incuring the highest loss rates of any carrier air wing during the Vietnam War. I'm not surprised it got disestablished. 58.164.45.129 (talk) 15:17, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: with this edit  you haven't said why it is necessary to have this level of heading (ie with one equals sign either side of the title). The error shows up here Wikipedia Check Wikipedia as a High category error. The text accompanying the maintenance category states:
"A heading starts with "= XY =". It should be "== XY ==". This causes organisational problems (See WP:MOSHEAD), as well as accessibility problems, especially with screen readers. (See WP:ACCESSIBILITY and Web Content Accessibility Guidelines)"
See here for the full page . Regards. The joy of all things (talk) 21:49, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Was not aware. I'll fix it. Thanks. Navalaviator84 (talk) 23:52, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heading error 

message: would you mind inserting the reference details for the books you were talking about, or at least titles, here, regarding Carrier Air Group TEN, so I can fill out the entry? Buckshot06 (talk) 06:30, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  CVG-10 (first formation)
Talk:Political crime

message: Yes 105.112.60.170 (talk) 00:22, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  politic breeds crime 

message: This article is tragically naive, but not unlike Trickle-down economics.  Political extortion and recompensation is commonplace.  Political crime shapes our government and politics in ways we have barely conceived of. JohnPritchard (talk) 14:49, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extortion
Talk:Alfama

message: I'm going to add an external link about a photo essay with captions on the old Lisbon's districs of Alfama and Castelo.
http://www.jordibusque.com/Index/Stories/AlfamaCastelo/AlfamaCastelo_01.html
Feel free to revert and discuss.Panex 19:23, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  External link 
Talk:Lisbon Baixa

message: Isn't this part of town called just "Baixa" normally? None of my maps of Lisbon include the "pombalina" part. Zocky | picture popups 16:54, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, as far as I known, the area is normally called simply Baixa. Nevertheless, "Baixa" is also the name of the Lower town in other Portuguese-speaking cities, like Coimbra, Oporto and Salvador de Bahia (Brazil). "Baixa Pombalina" refers exclusively to the rebuilt Lisbon Baixa under the Marquis de Pombal. Fsouza 13:30, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess the article should mention the fact that it's useually called simply Baixa? Zocky | picture popups 04:43, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Baixa? 

message: Hello Editors! I hope you find it relevant with a link pointing to a traveller's version of Baixa Pombalina - to complement your own more factual article - so I took the liberty of inserting an external link to "Blueprint of Lisbon". Keep it if you like. There are no commercial interests behind my initiative.
Scribbleman (talk) 11:57, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: External links policy on Advertising and conflicts of interest states You should avoid linking to a website that you own, maintain or represent, and in this case, you are Terje Raa . Unfortunately your  conflict of interest editing involves contributing to Wikipedia in order to promote yourself and your articles. Such a conflict is strongly discouraged. Your contributions to wikipedia under Scribbleman  consist entirely of promoting Terje Raa / bootsnall.com / travellady.com and is considered  WP:Spam. Looking through your contributions as a whole, the all seem to be Terje Raa/bootsnall.com/travellady.com related only. Please do not continue adding links to your own websites to Wikipedia. It has become apparent that your account are only being used for spamming inappropriate external links and for self-promotion.  Wikipedia is NOT a "repository of links" or a "vehicle for advertising" and persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted. Any further spamming may result in your account and/or your IP address being blocked from editing Wikipedia. Avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines. You're here to improve Wikipedia -- not just to promote yourself, right?  --Hu12 13:22, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: External Link
Talk:Simón Bolívar Symphony Orchestra

message: The discography is current only up to 2008. Since then DG has published many more albums.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.170.39.233 (talk) 23:06, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discography 

message: I think this article is very objective. Let's keep up with this line!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Karljoos (talk • contribs) 13:53, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quality
Talk:Bottled in bond

message: Removed "whisky" as an alternate spelling of "whiskey". It is needlessly pedantic, superfluous to the article, and moreover by convention American and Irish variations of this spirit use the 'e', as distinct from Scottish, Welsh, Canadian and Japanese, which do not. Though variation exists, but this is not significant. 69.30.112.10 18:20, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Preach, brother! R0m23 (talk) 05:21, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It might help to mention the tiny fact that the regulation of the "Bonded" whiskey by the federal government ceased in 1943.--MarioSmario (talk) 13:25, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you please cite some credible source? —BarrelProof (talk) 07:08, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  No longer a regulation 

message: Removed Old Forester as it is not a bonded bourbon only a 100 proof bourbon. There are no claims to being bonded on the Signature bottle.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hatch mpls (talk • contribs) 02:46, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed Old Forester 

message: "as this means that the product contains a less diluted spirit with correspondingly more flavor."
"a less diluted spirit with correspondingly more flavor" -   There is no clear relationship between dilution and flavor specifically.  The initial product of distillation is essentially mostly pure grain alcohol (excluding usually discarded methanol, or wood, alcohol produced prior to the still reaching its proper production temperature), and is typically diluted prior to either bottling for consumption or transfer to a barrel for aging, in order to render it less harsh and biting (not to mention somewhat less dramatically intoxicating).  A typical immediate distillate might be between 150 and 180 proof, or thereabouts.  It would be, again typically, reduced to around 150 or so proof before barrel aging, or to between 80 and 100 proof if bottled immediately for consumption. The flavor contained is normally a result of the specific grain mix used to produce the 'mash', so corn based distillates and rye based ones would have a different flavor range somewhat typical of the specific grain (or other starch or sugar source) type and batch.  Some, such as that from pure wheat or potatoes, normally is characterized by a near 'tasteless' quality.  In any event flavor and dilution are not specifically "corresponding", except in those case where the dilution is with specific flavoring agents, which themselves are not normally introduced in quantities substantial enough to much dilute the spirit.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.146.22.36 (talk) 18:08, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some rather dubious statements here...
Talk:Alta de Lisboa

message: Has this project been developed on a previously developed site? Development on a greenfield site is not consistent with the concept of urban renewal.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Diffly (talk • contribs) 07:09, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: A large portion of the site used to be a mixture of shanty towns, scattered informal workshops, some clusters of older settlements, including the town center of a rural settlement, and some early examples of social housing projects. It is acceptable to consider it a redevelopment, as most of the area already had urban uses before the project was started (albeit with big variations in density and formality). You can check an aerial photo of the area before the project started: https://musgueirasul.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/mnmseoutros2.jpg Pedrojpinto (talk) 10:43, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The recovered link to the University of Calgary website provides the needed clarification: it is obvious for us here in Lisbon that this is a renewal project of a large area formerly occupied mostly by informal housing and warehouses, but having a foreign institution say so renders this issue beyond question. Plus, no one has bother to check or question my earlier assessment, which is disappointing given the haste with which the article's credibility was put into question. This is a long, long process of urban renewal, but it is indeed huge and continuously supported by the municipality itself, as the agreement with the private developer partnership has been amended and renewed twice (1997 and 2011) since the original signing in 1984. It was promoted initially by the municipality itself, as it needed to provide decent housing conditions for the people in leaving in the shanty towns. The land-use redevelopment scheme was set up by the municipality in agreement with the developer that one an international competition. It is a public-led project, developed by a private promoter. This has been substantially clarified by the provision of new references and the recovery of others. Therefore, I'm removing the neutrality check banner. Pedrojpinto (talk) 15:36, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Urban renewal

message: This development does not appear to implement any of the defining elements of New Urbanism. A quick glance at the photos on the project's website confirms this (here's an example). I suggest removing any reference to New Urbanism and removing the category New Urbanism communities. Diffly (talk) 12:18, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: LOL, agreed. Doing it. Genjix (talk) 18:41, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: New Urbanism dispute

message: I've found no references supporting the 200 million euros a year statement. If none is added, that sentence should be removed. Pedrojpinto (talk) 15:36, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: 200 million euros a year
Talk:Ali Omar Ermes

message: 1) Editors of this page should contact Ermes or associates to get permission to upload some of his paintings. Providing descriptions allow the readers to picture or maybe search for the pieces on their own, but if photos of the paintings could be uploaded, it would be beneficial for the readers to relate even more to the descriptions and implications.
2) Where the artworks were exhibited provides helpful information for the readers to relate to the artwork as well. Ermes' official page for his exhibitions are currently down, so editors should check at appropriate times to update the information. 
3) If possible, photos of Ermes can be uploaded for readers' information of the artist as well.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Littlefu0311 (talk • contribs) 22:04, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos of Artwork, Descriptions, and Place of Exhibition
Talk:Tangier, Virginia

message: Editors may wish to use material from this report.
*An island in Chesapeake Bay is disappearing — and so is a British dialect and a piece of history—Public Radio International (July 20, 2014)
—Wavelength (talk) 23:33, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: More on that here http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/trump-tangier-island-mayor-climate-change_us_59406a8ce4b09ad4fbe3fa03?ncid=inblnkushpmg00000009 JamesG5 (talk) 04:32, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shrinkage of island 

message: There is no mention of the island's Cornish roots, and the section on linguistics wanders around other British dialects. Yet there is a Cornish-American category link. But most telling is the fact that the Cornish flag is in the city's flag's canton! - Keith D. Tyler ¶ 06:40, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cornish roots 

message: — Assignment last updated by Micha03 (talk) 23:10, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Environmental and Climate Justice
Talk:Honma Munehisa

message: If some of the content of a page really is an infringement, then the infringing content should be removed, and a note to that effect should be made on the talk page, along with the original source. If the author's permission is obtained later, the text can be restored. 
Pleclech 18:29, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Sorry, but I don't always trust technical analyst books.  Are there any non-TA books or references, or perhaps some Japanese references?  Smallbones (talk) 22:14, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. How about some historical references besides only TA books? It sounds like it could be a cute story some analyst made up to make his new chart technique sound more impressive. 67.180.202.175 (talk) 23:14, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Searching on Google Books for both variants of the name "Munehisa Homma" and "Homma Munehisa" reveals only books on technical analysis. This doesn't look good. If he was really an extremely wealthy rice merchant, he should be at least mentioned in contemporary histories of Japan, but I can't find a single mention of him outside the context of western TA books. Kwertii (talk) 23:22, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The Japanese wikipedia page adds many details, but no sources. http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E6%9C%AC%E9%96%93%E5%AE%97%E4%B9%85  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.35.36.132 (talk) 23:39, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Any Japanese references 

message: did he really say this? Lmao, this man existence is suspicious, I'm with the people above, even if there is sources from the 70s I think this man is an invention of some modern (probably japanese) economist, or maybe he took the name of some Edo period trader and made an analysis putting new things under his name. Mirad1000 (talk) 21:32, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: After investigating a bit though, the book of the three monkeys mentioned in the article seems to exist, and it is about finance. What it seems to be a legitimate copy published in 19th century was scanned by the Kyoto university. If someone is able to read japanese maybe it could comfirm the claims made in the article. At least even if it wasn't made by the man mentioned in this page the origin of the candlestick chart would still lie in Japan. What I'm more curious about is if there is the psychological analysis claimed by Steve Nison.
Source of the document:  https://rmda.kulib.kyoto-u.ac.jp/item/rb00012360#?c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=0&r=0&xywh=0%2C-277%2C3049%2C2600
Mirad1000 (talk) 23:46, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "when all are bearish, there is cause for prices to rise"
Talk:Masuzo Shikata

message: The paper referenced was printed in the Recueil des Travaux Chimiques des Pays-Bas, which no longer exists.  There may be a copy for pay at the European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, which apparently reprinted some papers of numerous forgotten journals.  Gaviidae 18:30, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:St. Marys, Ontario

message: This article needs major cleanup to conform to Wikipedia's quality standards.  It appears that content has been copied directly from the town's website. --Ptrbnsn 18:31, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: See https://www.google.ca/search?q=mayor+st.+marys+ontario&oq=mayor+st.+marys+ontario&aqs=chrome..69i57j0.4703j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#q=mayor+st.+marys+ontario+Al+Strathdee+-+Mayor.&tbs=qdr:m
OR Contact Us - Town of St. Marys
www.townofstmarys.com/Modules/contact/search.aspx?s...mid_=100711
Al Strathdee - Mayor
Peter K Burian (talk) 23:21, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mayor is  Al Strathdee