Talk:Saqib Ali

message: While the article is a complete mess the Washington Post is portraying his and Keith Ellison's victories as signs of Muslim Americans growing engagement in the political process and see his election as a historic marker. Therefore the article should be cleaned up instead of deleted.Wowaconia 22:14, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Argument for notability 

message: :GA review (see here for criteria)
#It is reasonably well written.
#:a (prose):  b (MoS): 
#It is factually accurate and verifiable.
#:a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
#It is broad in its coverage.
#:a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
#It follows the neutral point of view policy.
#:a (fair representation):  b (all significant views): 
#It is stable.
#:
#It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
#:a (tagged and captioned):  b lack of images (does not in itself exclude GA):  c (non-free images have fair use rationales): 
#Overall: 
#:a Pass/Fail:  Diez2 16:41, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Review

message: this needs to be something other than an autobiography. WillC 01:53, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If you look at the history of this page you'll see that I was one of the main contributors and I became intrested in him when he was mentioned on CNN alongside Keith Ellison (politician) whose election was in my district. As this article was scant and un-wiki when I looked into it I worked to bring it up to wiki-standards. I live in Minnesota not Maryland and while I am not a Muslim I think its intresting to see how Muslim-Americans and non-Muslim Americans are getting along in the post 9/11 world.--Wowaconia 02:20, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  obviously an inside job 

message: I must agree with User:WillC, and list this article up for a Good Article review. The introduction appears to give a purely positive outlook on this person and various politically signfigant things, things like "won the right" and excessive use of victory are the first sign there's a problem here. Of course, other people may not see it that way, so i've filed a WP:GA/R on this article, and also because it was not properly listed on the main GA page, and I figured I might as well go and handle the articles which showed up on a list of improperly passed articles anyway. Homestarmy 19:50, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: --Wowaconia 22:08, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I admit, my standards often are arbitrary when it comes to how dramatic certain word choices sound, but that's part of why I put the article up for review instead of just saying that i'll delist it tommorow or something. I probably would of filed the review anyway, i've been dealing with articles that haven't been listed as GA's properly all today anyway, and i've listed several others that seemed somewhat controversial as well, the way I see it, it doesn't hurt to make the status of these articles relatively certain. Homestarmy 22:14, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA/R

message: :Image:Trespass notification.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 05:04, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Trespass notification.jpg

message: Based on the title and most of the article, this page is about Ali.  The lead paragraph contains far more, however, about a rise of South Asian political influence in the U.S.  Most of the information on political clout should be moved elsewhere, with the lead rewritten to introduce the whole rest of the page. —ADavidB 01:39, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This is noted in the GA Review. Thanks. Warrior4321 07:40, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content of the lead paragraph 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Saqib Ali. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/local/politics/bal-md.ali11jan11,0,1183282.story?coll=bal-mdpolitics-headlines
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071011113811/http://www.zogbyworldwide.com/sb/Readsb.cfm?ID=6744 to http://www.zogbyworldwide.com/sb/Readsb.cfm?ID=6744
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.delawareonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070111/NEWS/70111015
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120415110936/http://wamu.org/audio/kn/06/12/k1061207-12496.asx to http://www.wamu.org/audio/kn/06/12/k1061207-12496.asx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:30, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified