lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Rectenna

message: Please explain this in more detail.  Schottky diodes and p-n junctions used in solar cells are kind of the same thing.  I assume the optical rectennas would be more than just a metal-semiconductor version of the solar cell... - Omegatron 00:11, Jan 9, 2005 (UTC)
-------------
This is an article about a new manufacturing technique using Atomic Layer Deposition to create optical rectenna, which has so impressed the National Science Foundation that they've granted $650K for R&D.
http://today.uconn.edu/blog/2013/02/uconn-professors-patented-technique-key-to-new-solar-power-technology/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.190.118.132 (talk) 18:45, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The system might work with low entropy coherent radiation like radio, microwave, or laser transmissions but not with black body radiation.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Model E (talk • contribs) 03:27, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It would work with sunlight.  Just like a solar cell, it works as long as the radiant energy striking it is greater than the thermal black body radiation it emits.  Sunlight has a far higher "color temperature" than room temperature infrared black body radiation.  It just wouldn't work as a "free energy" device to convert ambient black body radiation to electricity, because the "Johnson noise" (thermal noise currents) in the load circuit would drive the antenna as a transmitter, causing it to radiate as much energy as it receives, resulting in no net electrical energy delivered to the load. --ChetvornoTALK 23:06, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Optical rectennae 

message: What will be the size of rectenna if we use it to provide energy for an aeroplane or a car.--ZainAliK 20:55, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Size of rectenna 

message: It seems we could lose the last paragraph under 'Optical' :
"This device is used to perform the delicate corneal inversion procedure, Multi-Opti-Pupil-Optomy. In order to keep from damaging the eye sockets, they've got to go in through the rectum."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.204.53.249 (talk) 02:21, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Through the Rectum?

message: WTF? Citation or can we bail on this?
*I would also like to see where and why this is "prohibited." --Newton21989 (talk) 07:00, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Theft of Electricity

message: Please add more reliable sources to the article in order to keep it on Wikipedia. As of now no sources are being cited. Coaster7 (talk) 02:08, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: this source may be of use for this article: the history of wireless power transmission by william c brown.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Daiv (talk • contribs) 05:17, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  source 

message: I hesitate to simply replace the existing explanation. Interested parties, please discuss!
YodaWhat (talk) 03:09, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point.  I changed it from phased array to array.  --ChetvornoTALK 23:09, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better explanation of Whys and Wherefores
Talk:Bob Matsui

message: I think it might be worth mentioning his family's Christmas cards which he sent to thousands of people.  They are very notable, so it seems. -- AllyUnion (talk) 08:23, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Christmas Cards 
Talk:Teacher in role

message: I wrote the article as it stands, and i agree it needs work. If anyone is intrested in helping I suggest reading articles by dorothy heathcote & jonothan neelands. I would try, but as it has been mentioned I seem to be writing an academic essay, not an encyclopedic entry.
--Arlechinio 04:14, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Research 

message: My first attempt at wikifying, or any real editing.  Hope I didn't botch it.  Regards, Anonymous.
You did fine.  I went through, added a few more wikifications, then removed the Wikify template.  I don't believe that there is any more need for a notice, as most applicable links are wikified now.
Cabhan 00:20, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikified 

message: I put the cleanup tag on this article because I don't understand it enough to rewrite it; I can't figure out what it's trying to say. What the heck does "teacher in role" even mean??? (I would have AFD'd it except for the above vote). - DavidWBrooks 20:23, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  cleanup 

message: maybe this should be moved as a sub-section in a drama in education entry, as it is only a method of teaching and not an actual concept in itself. I've tried to re-write it but as a concept its hard to explain without knowing why it's being used. I know i don't make much sense but it is an important thing just not explained to well. sorry
--Arlechinio 23:05, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  maybe should be moved 

message: I am going to remove the entire example section. I would have sent it to AfD but that has been done and my Google search does show notability. I will post a note to the Drama Education project and ask someone to make some sense of the rest.--killing sparrows 05:40, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  major pruning 

message: I am not totally sure, but isn't this article about the same as teaching in-Role? only that this article is talking about the one doing the action, and the other article about the action. Snuitkever (talk) 14:57, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging 

message: Stumbled across this article trying to find out about Dorothy Heathcote and wow, the 'Importance' section is full of opinions. I can't see how that section relates to the topic either.
Kissycat (talk) 15:33, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importance Section 

message: Stumbled across this article. It has enough notability but I'm going to try to just make it a bit more encyclopaedic in format without cutting any of the information. ƒin (talk) 06:43, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: More wikifying?
Talk:AD 88

message: Why are people putting info about stuff called 88 other than the year on this article?? Georgia guy 00:33, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd need to dig more to find a good source on it, but "88" sounds like "byebye" in Chinese, and so is used as such in Chinese netspeak (see also: Crazy 88).  This sometimes leads to some misunderstandings where Chinese people using it casually are mistaken for neo-Nazis. --Delirium 19:56, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

text: The "heil hitler" thing shouldn't be included - that's to do with symbolism related to the number, this article is about the year. Hanii (talk) 21:29, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: As it says at the top of the article, For other uses, see 88 (number). That's where you'll find info about the "Heil Hitler" connotation. /Ludde23 Talk Contrib 08:45, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Bohdan Boyko

message: Please, feel free to translate and reorganize the article. Sashazlv 00:47, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Autobiography 
Talk:Mykhailo Brodskyy

message: Please, feel free to translate and reorganize the article. Sashazlv 00:47, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Autobiography 
Talk:Lilian Baylis

message: What could possibly be wrong with calling her British? <KF> 00:55, Jan 9, 2005 (UTC)
:read that and went "huh?" until I looked at the edit history. Seems like we both edited at same time but somehow didn't hit a conflict, instead my change overwrite yours. Have put it back in. --Vamp:Willow 01:26, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sydenham railway station, Sydney

message: from VfD:
What is the relevance of a railway station? JoaoRicardo 01:23, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Note that there are more where that came from. Gazpacho 02:03, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, plenty of schools are kept if they are sensible articles, deserve/have more than one/two lines and can't be merged with the parent location. zoney ♣ talk 14:13, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: That would be all of them then. --Centauri 23:30, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: According to the timetable effective from 4 Sept 2005, the only East Hills inbound trains stopping at Sydenham on weekdays are at 5am, 7.26, 7.41, 7.56 and 8.11am, and (except on Fridays) 11.59pm. To me this looks a lot like running in the morning peak only. JPD 11:40, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timetable info
Talk:Nintendo Entertainment System/Family Computer

message: I have moved this article from "Nintendo Entertainment System/Family Computer" back to "Nintendo Entertainment System" (twice now) for the following reasons.
1.The person who moved the article did not exsplain their reasoning on the talk page.
2.It will interfere with the featured article canadacy. Any move of this nature should be done after this process is complete
3.The name change seemed longer and redundant. Possibley, they were worried about people looking for the famicom. If this is the case a REDIRECT page would be more applicable. 
before moving again please discuss. --The_stuart 01:47, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moving "Nintendo Entertainment System" to "Nintendo Entertainment System/Family Computer"
Talk:AltiVec

message: The articel states that the VMX128 extension is used in the Cell processor. AFAIK the Cell PPE only contains the normal VMX instruction set, so I deleted this reference. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.138.28.134 (talk) 18:21, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That is wrong. Cell does _not_ have a "G5+ core", whatever that means the PPE is quite different from PowerPC 970, and it does not have VMX128, but the regular VMX unit (similar to PowerPC 970, 7400 (not 7450 and later e600 cores), POWER6 and PA6T). You are confusing VMX128 with the regular VMX unit that is 128 bit, but only has 32 registers. VMX128 has 128 registers, and it's only used in Xenon in the Xbox 360 (as far as anyone knows). -- Henriok (talk) 11:06, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  VMX128 in Cell? 

message: I can't find any evidence of anything called VMX 2 or VMX 3. The Power ISA v3.0B (implemented by POWER9) doesn't even contain the text "VMX" at all. - Torpcoms (talk) 08:35, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the headings Torpcoms (talk) 05:55, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  VMX 2 and VMX 3 not verifiable 

message: What's the current status of Altivec?
Is it still being included in new CPUs?
Is it dead? dying? surviving? growing? What's its market share?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sayitclearly (talk • contribs) 11:33, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current status?
Talk:Dmytro Korchynsky

message: Please, feel free to translate and reorganize the article. Sashazlv 00:47, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Autobiography 

message: This guy is a founder of (УНСО) Ukrainian People's Self - Defence group, which is basically a paramilitary/terrorist/anarchist/mercenary group of thugs from mostly soviet military or criminal background. Group participated in many small-scale wars(Georgia(Abkhazia), Moldowa, Chechnia, Serbia, etc. ), usually choosing side opposite to russians. Claims that existence of his group was a primary reason for amendments to Ukrainian law, directed against mercenary groups and illegal weapon possession. (1994???)
Source: His book Война в толпе: Мой опыт политического насилия. (rough translation War in the crowd: My experience of political violence )  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.249.84.110 (talk) 17:27, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some unedited background info to be incorporated 

message: Korchynskyy's party (Bratstvo) will be auctioned on Friday, November 11 2011. — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 16:55, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  His party is up for sale 

message: Is this real? If it is, does it merit mention in the article? Esn (talk) 11:38, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: That website is a blogger blog so it isn't WP:RS. It redirects here which isn't a working website. So, I would say, no, it should not be mentioned in the article unless someone finds some better sourcing.--FeralOink (talk) 14:59, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Did Korchinsky call to ally with ISIS against Russia?
Talk:Oleksandr Rzhavskyy

message: Please, feel free to translate and reorganize the article. Sashazlv 00:47, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Autobiography 

message: "In his program, he promised to establish order in Ukraine, using the methods of Russian President Vladimir Putin". Is this some kind of joke? Editrite! (talk) 00:58, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: No joke. Tuvalkin (talk) 15:11, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vladimir Putin
Talk:Petro Symonenko

message: Please, feel free to translate and reorganize the article. Sashazlv 00:47, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: His Party faction in the Parliament was notorious for being the most disciplined and reliable to vote for the cash bonus and nothing else, thus being devoid of the communist ideology (or any other ideology for that matter). As an unideologic in its essense party it took played do significant role in the O.R. for either side. It supported the Political Reform in Ukraine though, if I remember correctly. --Irpen 02:57, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Autobiography 
Talk:Nataliya Vitrenko

message: Please, feel free to translate and reorganize the article. Sashazlv 00:47, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Autobiography 

message: This article is deeply biased against Mrs Vitrenko. There are lots of subjective words 'radical', 'controversial' which do not fit into an objective article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Claudiuscrockett (talk • contribs) 11:32, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Bias
Talk:Yuriy Zbitnyev

message: Please, feel free to translate and reorganize the article. Sashazlv 00:47, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Autobiography 
Category talk:English people by occupation

message: I would like to abolish all of these categories. At present there are lots of "English people" categories and lots of "British people" categories, and they way they are being used is hopelessly inconsistent. I should think that lots of Wikipedians don't realise that they both exist, and casual users of the site are even less likely to realise that this dual cateogorisation is being applied. 
I think it would be fine to just put English people into "British people" categories. If the Scots, Welsh and Northern Irish want to create parallel categories, that would be fine.
Any comments? Philip 02:15, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I've just discovered that a future version of the software may allow readers to look through sub-categories if they wish, so I suppose these won't do any harm in that case. I've made several of them subcategories of the relevant "British xxxxxx" category. Philip 02:58, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lords Commissioners of the Treasury

message: We say that there are at least six concurrently, and then that, at present there are only two.  Have the junior lords just not been appointed yet? john k (talk) 15:10, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current situation 

message: This article needs a total rewrite.  It confuses two entirely different types of office.  It isn't helped by the ancient and archaic titles used in the British Government - but isn't that what encyclopaedic article are supposed to explain?
Essentially, the 1st Lord of the Treasury is the Prime Minister.  The 2nd Lord of the Treasury is the Chancellor of the Exchequor, and is the only "Lord of the Treasury" actually to have any direct role in the Treasury department.  The remaining "Lords of the Treasury" are correctly known as the Lord Commissioners of the Treasury, which is simply the formal title given to the Government junior whips.
Achilver (talk) 15:32, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The article is factually accurate, so that there is nothing wrong with it in principle.  What you may want is at HM Treasury, which describes how the Treasury actually operates.  Peterkingiron (talk) 16:02, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is a total mess 

message: The Encyclopaedia Britanica 1911 link is dead.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.241.91.40 (talk) 21:42, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead Link 

message: Is a Lord Commissioner of the Treasury.
https://www.gov.uk/government/people/alan-mak
Condo951795 (talk) 12:53, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Further references https://www.gov.uk/government/ministers/government-whip-lord-commissioner-of-hm-treasury and https://www.alanmak.org.uk/About
Condo951795 (talk) 02:52, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alan Mak 

message: There should be a list of previous office holders. It would be quote some work to make — perhaps somebody at HMT could do the work? JDAWiseman (talk) 11:28, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of previous Lords Commissioners of the Treasury
Talk:Simon Weston

message: When was this fellow awarded the OBE?(the fat mans present) Seems that it would be a good point to add.
His charity's bio indicates the OBE was awarded in 1992, now added. Jas88 19:47, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  OBE 

message: Never heard that term. Can somebody explain it? Awiseman 20:01, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone who has been capped for their country in both Rugby Union and Rugby League.
Capped just means you play for the national team.
In the UK there are two forms of Rugby , League & Union - dual code international level means they have played at international level at both codes - a somewhat rare feat.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.8.72.163 (talk) 22:49, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's a dual code international? 

message: I've just removed an unsourced claim that he topped the 2014 Freuds Heroes Index poll. I could have sourced it - easy to do - but this supposedly new annual award has no standalone article here and seems only ever to be mentioned in the context of Weston. It may never have been conducted again and it only surveyed 4000 people. - Sitush (talk) 06:11, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Freuds Heroes Index
Talk:Erie Triangle

message: Any relation to the Bermuda triangle?
:Possibly.  A lot of people seem to disappear from this region. --Write On 1983 04:15, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Triangles. 

message: Thank you editors for the nice little article. 
LaTeeDa (talk) 00:15, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thank You  

message: The map shows county lines and county names in bordering states, but not for Ontario. Suggested for addition: Norfolk County and Haldimand County, both of which border Erie County. Also: remove “Province of Ontario, Canada”, and replace with “ONTARIO”, using the same all-caps type used for state names, and in the same point size.  Yoho2001 (talk) 05:56, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map additions 

message: The page has too much uncited information, possibly WP:OR. Zorblin (talk) 22:26, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original research and/or inline citation issue in the page
Talk:Albumen print

message: The step by step process described was gathered, in large part, from the site A.D. White Photographs.  Should this be credited in the article somewhere?
* I agree, it's a substantial reproduction. Captainmax
I understand how the negative is produced, but the text doesn't make clear how it is then printed to a positive. Captainmax 04:37, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The version 06:45, 11 September 2019‎ Monkbot of this article is translated into Chinese Wikipedia.--Wing (talk) 10:22, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation into Chinese Wikipedia
Talk:Swiss folklore

message: Doesn't Swiss mythology also include such things as William Tell and the Eidgenossen?  Or should those be under "Swiss legends"? Michael Hardy 03:45, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: For some of the traditions listed here it is more than a bit of a stretch to call them Pre-Christian. I'm thinking especially of the urban customs like Böög and Vogel Gryff. Trigaranus (talk) 12:33, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pre-Christian 

message: I added an additional item to the list of Legends of Pre-Confederate Switzerland. This is a story which is told to many jung kids Switzerland.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.2.188.205 (talk) 15:29, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legends of Pre-Confederate Switzerland
Talk:Nuke (disambiguation)

message: Also add a disambugation as nuke refers to the fictional drug presented in Robocop 2.
"nuke" used for nuclear when referring to non-weapons use?
I have noticed that many websites (msnbc.com for one) and other media are starting to use the word nuke as shorthand for nuclear when referring to Iran's nuclear program in article headlines.  I have also noticed the word nuke being fully replaced by nuclear in the article.
Is this an attempt by various media to purposely infer that Iran is interested in only weapons related nuclear research, and could not be interested in power generation?
71.115.14.95 04:13, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: hereby, dispute this assertion:
----
A colloquialism for a nuclear weapon, or the use of one
A former (now disused) colloquialism for a nuclear power plant
----
Is there any proof of this "now disused" claim?
I am not aware of it.
There might be more data regarding "exploit"{??} [ exploit_%28computer_security%29 ].
Thank You.
hopiakuta ;  { [[ %7e%7e%7e%7e ]] } ; ]] 09:19, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If the term is still used that way, feel free to removed the "now disused" part of the description.  I personally haven't heard a nuclear power plant referred to as a "nuke" in a long time, though it was common back about 1975-1980, but if your information or experience is different, go ahead and change the article. --Mwalimu59 21:30, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  I do, 

message: ummm.... could i have a link to verification of this lol?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kmmnderkoala (talk • contribs) 13:59, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  really? microwaving food?
Talk:Views of Lyndon LaRouche and the LaRouche movement/Archive 2

message: LaRouche publications have repeatedly said that the so-called "Train Salon" was the nexus of both the plan for more criminal investigations of LaRouche AS WELL AS a wave of publicity that would justify indictments. That is the point of the LaRouchite book "Railroad." That is why I suggested the so-called "Train Salon" material belonged on the Unites States v. LaRouche page. My argument is that both claims are a conspiracy theory without foundation. To show that, I need to demonstrate that criminal investigations into the SPECIFIC illegal fundraising activities for which the LaRouchites were later indicted began BEFORE the first Train meeting. Also, I can show that the significant NBC coverage of LaRouche and his activities began in 1984, BEFORE the meeting I attended in 1985, making claims I was a party to it unsubstantiated. Furthermore, I can substantiate that I suggested in a letter to NBC that they do such a program in 1983, before I had ever heard of Train. This is the only way to debunk the LaRouchite conspiracy theory, and false claims about me. --Cberlet 16:26, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: If you look at the long and convoluted history of this article, the Train material was orginally added to balance what is euphemistically termed "criticism" coming from Cberlet and others. The material on the Train meetings comes as a subtopic to "LaRouche's Critics", and any additions to that section should be germane to that topic. To my knowledge, no one is claiming that Cberlet was a party to the NBC coverage beginning in 1984. Further, it is unclear to me to what Cberlet is specifically referring as the "LaRouchite conspiracy theory" -- the Train meetings are alleged to have planned the substantial wave of hostile press coverage which folowed them. If Chip wants to raise issues about the relationship of the press coverage to the prosecution, then perhaps it would be appropriate to do this on the United States v. LaRouche page. --HK 16:51, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Railroading Train