lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Angel Oak

message: The cited source for age doesn't mention who estimated the age, let alone their credentials, the method used, or if this has been corroborated by any scientific authority. It's just "some guy said he thinks this..." 24.236.70.18 (talk) 23:02, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: There are published references that claim the age of Angel Oak to be somewhere between 300 and 1500 years old.Iconic trees of South Carolina  The age of living trees is usually determined by dendrochronology, where an increment borer is used to extract a small sample of wood tissue to count growth rings. However, the trunk of Angel Oak no longer has solid wood extending to its core. Consequently, a 'best guess' by professional foresters and arborists, not just 'some guy', is that Angel Oak ranges between 300 and 500 years old,South Carolina’s Majestic Angel Oak is Impressive (page 9) as reported on the tree's website.Angel Oak Tree Woodlot (talk) 15:19, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age of Angel Oak 

message: Flickr Set of Angel Oak pictures - these are pictures I took at Angel Oak.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Joel8x (talk • contribs) 01:18, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Here's another one. ---------User:DanTD (talk)  23:34, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures of Angel Oak
Talk:Sacred Oak

message: Just visited the Sacred Oak, and it is wonderful.  But I don't believe it is the largest tree in Berks County.  We actually passed larger trees on our drive home.  So, I believe that portion of the current article is inaccurate and should be amended.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.15.237.110 (talk) 15:22, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Capon Oak Tree

message: 55.46219,-2.554628 --John (talk) 23:41, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Co-ordinates 
Talk:Malpighiales

message: Some of the relevant articles are paywalled, so I'm reluctant to just Be Bold, but haven't all recent results, including Wurdack and Davis (2009), said that Rafflesiaceae are embedded within Euphorbiaceae? (I'm basing this on the abstract in the case of the Wurdack and Davis).  If so I would recommend writing this in the cladogram as a single entry worded as "Euphorbiaceae (including Rafflesiaceae)", rather than as two sister families. Kingdon (talk) 20:17, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd be willing to get any articles for you when you need them. Just drop me a message on my talk page if you're still interested in this to expand based on the full text of those articles. Cheers, Rkitko (talk) 01:54, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks; I'll let you know if I get the time/interest to do more on this and need them, but sticking with the status quo for now is OK with me. I'm not sure Euphorbiaceae without Rafflesiaceae is paraphyletic if Peraceae is split out. Kingdon (talk) 21:54, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rafflesiaceae sister to Euphorbiaceae? 

message: I'm planning to add a gallery of type genera (for the APG IV families), similar to what I did over at Brassicales ... I don't have strong preferences about any of this, let me know what you think. - Dank (push to talk) 15:54, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gallery
Talk:Boliviana negra

message: The main glyphosate/Roundup article doubts the existence of "RoundupReady" coca varieties.  This article does not make such suggestion.  Is there any source on this either way?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.99.246.115 (talk) 14:29, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does it exist?
Talk:Boston/redirects/Archive 1

message: Why doesn't this page redirect to Boston (disambiguation)?  216.234.130.130 19:12, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Because Boston, Mass. is many times huger than any other Boston.  Most people looking for Boston on Wikipedia want the one in Massachusetts. --Nelson Ricardo 23:53, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It was agreed some time ago by a vote at the village pump that this should redirect to Boston, Massachusetts. Unfortunately I cant find a link to the said page. G-Man 23:55, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

text: Boston, Massachusetts may be the largest town of that name, but it is named after the town in Lincolnshire. I think that not redirecting to the disambiguation page is POV. Dancarney 13:40, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Then explain how Worcester, Portsmouth and Truro all direct to the places in the UK, even though all have namesakes in North America that are just as (and in Worcester's case, arguably more) important. Likewise, similar situations where NA cities are definitely more important than UK ones (Halifax, Sudbury, Hartford) are dab pages, while Cleveland had to be put up to a vote. This is not uk.wikipedia.org. Kirjtc2 00:51, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Neither is it usa.wikipedia.org.  DDStretch  (talk) 01:54, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect discussion

message: FYI... There is a request to move Boston, Massachusetts to Boston; see Talk:Boston, Massachusetts.  --Serge 22:37, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested Move

message: There is a survey in progress at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (settlements) to determine if there is consensus on a proposed change to the U.S. city naming conventions to be consistent with other countries, in particular Canada. --Serge 05:39, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey on proposal to make U.S. city naming guidelines consistent with others countries

message: The only way to keep this debate fair is to have Boston redirect to the disambig page Lenzar 00:16, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation

message: A quick google search reveals the vast majority of people looking for Boston were looking for Boston, Massachusetts; therefore this should direct there with a note at the top to disambig.--Loodog 13:19, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with Lenzar.  DDStretch  (talk) 01:51, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Direct to Boston, MA 

message: I've gone ahead and created an RFD to discuss where this redirect should point. Enjoy. --Bobblehead 18:40, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect FYI
Talk:Granadilla

message: shouldn't there also be a link here to wikipedia pages for other fruits known as granadilla, such as Passiflora quadrangularis (Giant Granadilla) and Passiflora Ligularis (Sweet Granadilla)?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.85.236.33 (talk) 22:34, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Hydnocarpus

message: God damn  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.86.104.19 (talk) 16:56, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Theodore Penland

message: Per some of the comments in the AFD discussion, I've proposed merging content from this article and redirecting it to Grand Army of the Republic, as he was a commander of that organization. --Coredesat 05:29, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: It has been months.  Why the delay?172.129.137.16 13:13, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge or delete
Talk:Caryocar nuciferum

message: According to www.tropicos.org and Brako L & Zarucchi JL 1993: "Catalogue of the Flowering Plants and Gymnosperms of Peru" Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis (Missouri) - USA.  Caryocar nuciferum L. is not present in Peru.  Since the distribution seems to be confined to Central America, Pacific Colombia, and the Northern Amazon and there are no specimens recorded from close to Peru, presence there doesn´t seem to be likely at all either.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.217.144.97 (talk) 20:54, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distribution 
Talk:Garcinia

message: Isn't the correct name of Garcinia cambogia Garcinia gummi-gutta? Badagnani (talk) 21:18, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: G. travancorica does not seem to be the same thing (see ). The situation with G. cambogia & G. gummi-gutta is complicated. See Talk:Gambooge for further discussion.Plantdrew (talk) 20:56, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Question
Talk:Calophyllum inophyllum

message: Nambagura, as it's called in Vanuatu, is touted for so many conditions and ailments that it seems like snake oil. When we visited the islands, we toured a laughably primitive production plant and bought a small jar as a curiosity.
Last night, my wife sustained a severe steam burn on three fingers. They turned lobster red, the skin stiffened and started to blister, and the pain was truly intense. Conventional home treatment may have halted the burn progress, but did not otherwise help.
Desperate by midnight and lacking any modern unguents or topical anesthetics, we found the little jug of Nambagura. Since it vaguely resembled petroleum jelly in appearance and consistency, my wife applied it to the burn.
The pain disappeared within minutes and the redness and blisters within two hours. Today there is no remaining evidence of this severe burn.
I am very distrustful of all "alternative" health remedies, and this is just one isolated anecdote. But I can't deny that this stuff, literally pressed and bottled in the middle of a jungle, produced astonishing results.
Does anyone else have any more (and better) evaluations of Nambagura?--Jim Stinson (talk) 02:59, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Clusia

message: Someone had added a comment that C. rosea = C. major with a citation to Robert W. Pemberton & Hong Liu Naturalized Orchid Bee Pollinates Resin-reward Flowers in Florida: Novel and Known Mutualisms, Biotropica 40(6):714-718. That is an interesting article, but it doesn't say that these Clusia species are synonyms, so I have removed it. Nadiatalent (talk) 21:11, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  C. major and C. rosea 

message: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/1622720  not on the species list  -rudyard (talk) 20:27, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clusia flava? 

message: How to add "Needs references/citations"? Someone who knows how, pls. add this.  (Note the # of paragraphs that do not include a ref.) Thanks! philiptdotcom (talk) 16:11, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  How to add "Needs references/citations"?
Talk:Balcerowicz Plan

message: "# Act of Monetary Return, freezing the exchange of Polish currency while maintaining a high level of inflation."
There can be little doubt that the Balcerowicz plan led to such a situation, but no one wants to slit their own throat. This is an important historical article, in my opinion. The reforms remain to this day controversial. Maybe few native English speakers know what the Balcerowicz plan was but the educated know what "shock therapy" was. To state that it was a deliberate attempt to screw oneself is both misinformative and stupid beyond belief. This is not a well known subject, but it is a controversial one, and it is easily subject to vandalism.
Pay attention. Who is looking after the quality of Polish articles except for me? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.115.97.180 (talk) 21:07, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: Since there is a text about growth since 1992, perhaps a kind soul would calculate average unemployment rate since 1992?
Data is here
--MyMoloboaccount (talk) 23:47, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Average unemployment rate since 1992 

message: Please don't remove sourced and valid information-the other user has based his edits on reliable sources, I see no reason why we should remove them.--MyMoloboaccount (talk) 18:32, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The Cambridge University Press source is fine. The rest is just polemics and politicians' opinions (do we seriously want to put up Lepper as a contrast to Balcerowicz?). Some of it violates WP:FRINGE. The whole edit is just one big exercise in POV pushing.Volunteer Marek (talk) 05:09, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please don't remove sourced and valid information 

message: There are a lot of non-neutral and disputable statements in the Effects section. Unemployment in Poland has risen drastically over 10-15 years, and the article is implying that it was just previous hidden unemployment, and attributing bankruptcies and unemployment to the reforms to some "widespread perception". However, the truth is that many people have lost their jobs. BeŻet (talk) 17:59, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Effects and NPOV
Talk:Vernicia fordii

message: "Vernicia fordii (Hemsl.) Airy Shaw (Tung Tree; syn. Aleurites fordii Hemsl.)"
This is an incomprehensible start. 216.8.170.184 (talk) 15:03, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Huh? 
Talk:History of Hartford, Connecticut

message: Those who settled in Hartford prior to February 1640, as sourced to this website: Jeremy Adams, Thomas Bull, John Haynes, John Higginson, Thomas Hooker, Edward Hopkins, William Parker, Richard Risley, John Skinner, Thomas Stanton, Samuel Stone, William Wadsworth, John Webster, Thomas Welles, George Wyllys. FallingGravity (talk) 07:27, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable names from [[Founders of Hartford, Connecticut]] 

message: What is missing from the city timeline article? Please add relevant content! Contributions welcome. Thank you. -- M2545 (talk) 09:19, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Timeline of Hartford, Connecticut]] 

message: There is plenty of history in the Hartford article. It has more than here.
The history part should be merged into that article. The list of original settlers could be given a small article.
Or the current article should beefed up so that it looks like more than a poor cousin to the history in the Hartford article.
178.39.122.125 (talk) 11:02, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Get rid of this article 
Talk:Acalypha

message: Caturus doesn't need to redirect here; it is also the generic name for a kind of extinct fish. Perhaps there could be a disambig note instead. 70.213.5.52 (talk) 01:23, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Polow da Don

message: the controversy about black/white people. why is he not black? Or is he just the idiot?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.8.232.6 (talk) 21:05, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy 

message: Its i15, not I-15. I-15 is an interstate.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.218.144.49 (talk) 13:08, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  i15!

message: can someone do something about the discography? it's a mess  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.127.171.15 (talk) 07:52, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  discography 

message: It think it's to say that Nicki Minaj is an assoiciated act.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.53.224.194 (talk) 03:25, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nicki Minaj 
Talk:Philip McCracken

message: I checked, and this is a real person, and apparently notable.  I know nothing about him or sculpture, though.--Parsleyjones 06:11, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Romanoa tamnoides

message: Romanoa is currently in use for two genera governed by the same nomenclatural code (ICNAFP). This shouldn't happen, and one of the names will need to be replaced. Until a replacement name is given for the later homonym, the best we can do on Wikipedia is reflect the names as they are currently being used. Both genera are monotypic, and although general practice on Wikipedia for monotypic genera is to title the article at the genus name, I have moved the articles to the species title to free up the ambiguous genus name for disambiguation. As far as I can determine, the fungus genus is the later homonym (described in 1954), but the plant genus was languishing in obscurity at that time (first described in 1848, but not widely used until 1980). Plantdrew (talk) 18:44, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Homonym
Talk:Copiah Academy

message: Ok, uhm, this page says, in the first paragraph... "consists of an upper-middle school and lower school known as Copiah Academy."
That's only partially true.  It also has a kindergarten and High School.  You can attend the facility from the age of 4 until you finish 12th grade.
67.142.130.13 06:22, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Excoecaria

message: I know nothing about mangroves, but today added information about one species' discovery in India. I can't imagine this species exists in India and northern Australia without also expecting to exist in most south-east Asian countries - but I can't update the page without knowing that as fact.
Suggest the first edit is a more correct distribution of that species. Alternatively - that species could be broken out into its own page. youcantryreachingme 00:56, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distribution 

message: The recent remarks inserted are totally unacceptable in their current form, but they are of major interest. Rather than delete them I converted them to comments. Please find citations describing the work so that readers can verify your source, and we can add the material to the article. JonRichfield (talk) 07:25, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Dr Bapuji's work
Talk:The Pancakes

message: How can you have a band with only one person? Isn't that a contradiction in terms? -- Hongooi 05:00, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: One-girl band
Talk:The Organon of the Healing Art

message: This user  made this removal . That was the oly edit by that user. Concretely, the user was created at 02:55, and the removal was made at 03:19 of the same day. I undid it, and merged the text the user added --Enric Naval (talk) 11:17, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was this removal wise? 

message: All of the "references" seem to link to a single webpage designed to earn money for someone. --JWSchmidt (talk) 20:23, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: These have now been fully revised and factual corrections added where required. Hope this improves the article. Peter morrell 07:43, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Great. Now they link to different webpages, each designed to earn money for someone. The only exception is the archive.org link.LeadSongDog come howl 16:53, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The problem is that all the convenient free copies on the web seem to be of this kind. There are some more archive.org versions. Someone could analyse which editions exist there; it's complicated because for the English editions of the Organon two years are relevant, and usually only one is given. (Some of the different German editions of the Organon are very different, with different numbering, and must not be confused.) Then after a lot of work perhaps we can get rid of half of the commercial links. Hans Adler 17:42, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It would seem that this would be an excellent task for either Project Gutenberg or for Wikisource. Ultimately, a side-by-side presentation of the "Organon der rationellen Heilkunde" and its English translation would be worth considering.LeadSongDog come howl 18:58, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow, it seems someone must have gotten the message: . LeadSongDog come howl! 20:48, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  references
Talk:2,4-Dimethyl-6-tert-butylphenol

message: this picture https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:2,4-Dimethyl-6-tert-butylphenol.png does not match formula  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr Vano (talk • contribs) 18:30, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture is wrong
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Oregon/Companies

message: Hi there!  Just came across this effort and wanted to mention that a WikiProject for all companies has now been established.  I hope we can work together going forward to improve the quality of company articles in Wikipedia.  Please check us out and let me know if you have any questions or concerns.  Cheers! Richc80 04:53, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:COMPANIES|WikiProject Companies]] now active! 

message: Time for some updates on WPOR companies, one more 500 and one more overall with PGE back. Aboutmovies (talk) 16:24, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fortune 500/1000 update
Talk:Hura crepitans

message: The images labeled as "Hura crepitans seeds" in the article's gallery correspond not to the seeds, but to the carpels of its fruit. The seeds are round and flat and, before the fruit expoldes, they are nested between the carpels. See the pictures in the following pages for reference:
* Antique botanical print of Hura crepitans. Seeds are in the left inferior corner.
*Hura crepitans seeds actual picture
After loading this note I will modify the article page.
Luis Bentolila (talk) 12:58, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mislabeling of ''Hura crepitans'' seeds
Talk:Muriel Belcher

message: Is this an article on Muriel Belcher, or the Colony Room? I propose that it is moved. It needs cleaning up too - Tiswas(t/c) 14:07, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed the redirect from Colony room to here, and copied some information from here to it; inevitably there is some duplication. But it seemed incorrect to just move the whole article. Straw Cat (talk) 22:58, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colony Room clients
Talk:Chudamani Vihara

message: sir, vanakkam.
we  are  VARALAATRU  AARVALAR KUZHU, NAGAPATTINAM"
 we feel that,the photo shown   as chudamani vihar -2009  @ nagapattinam is  not the proper one.
it is South indian railway office building @nagapattinam.which was  build during british period
as far us  we  are  concerned, british  build  St.Joseph College (now functioning at trichi) over the remains of choodamani varnan vihar ( where  nagapattinam  district court   functions now .)
please confirm.
k.ramachandran,  muraa3369@yahoo.com
for VARALAATRU  AARVALAR KUZHU, NAGAPATTINAM  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.215.22.114 (talk) 14:21, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  choodamani varman vihar @ nagapattinam 
Talk:Codiaeum variegatum

message: For examples: Are cuttings easy to make?  Do nurseries grow from seed or cuttings or what?
Also I noticed nothing on the root structure, depth, space requirements etc.
Is color affected by environmental factors such as light, stress or soil?--Doug Bashford 2607:FB91:1F08:8C3B:E494:46FF:FE10:4CFA (talk) 22:41, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nothing on propagation?
Talk:Acalypha bipartita

message: I don't think this article is a copyvio now. It should be expanded, without infringing anyone's copyright. --Eastmain 05:20, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. There were just so many from the same editor that it seemed nominating them all for speedy deletion and starting over was easiest. This works, too. I'll go through them all and fix the small style issues in taxoboxes and such. Cheers, --Rkitko (talk) 06:04, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Not a copyvio
Talk:Euphorbia heterophylla

message: Toxicity is documented in most species belonging to the genus Euphorbia.  All members of the genus Euphorbia are capable of causing allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis in individuals sensitive to latex.  Stories regarding the edibility of Euphorbia heterophylla are anecdotal.  Joegee (talk) 21:16, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

message: None of the pictures in this article are good. They are from non-representative dull varieties that don't display the contrasting red color that gives the plant its common names. Better pictures are needed. - Xufanc (talk) 02:30, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Are the leaves violin shaped like in the picture on the infobox?  If so, I have a couple of pictures that show red on the upper leaves.  It's a weed growing in my backyard and someone told me it might be a type of poinsettia.  It has violin shaped leaves (like the pic in the box) and the top couple of leaves are turning bright red like a poinsettia (though it's only part of the leave).  I'm not sure if it's really the euphorbia heterophylla or another variety since I live in the south eastern United States...  Lime in the Coconut 15:57, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Bad Pictures

message: The plant described in the article is Euphorbia cyathophora, which is not a synonym of Euphorbia heterophylla, although that name has previously misapplied to it. For example see the key in Flora Costaricensis or these Weeds of Australia pages    — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nomen ambiguum (talk • contribs) 22:12, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. Euphorbia cyathophora now has its own article (stub). Sminthopsis84 (talk) 20:17, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misapplied name