Wikipedia talk:Lists of common misspellings/For machines

message: Note:
* Each line starts with a space. You can use some basic regular expressions to remove that.
* The replace is not always suited for a simple find-replace, eg "accomadate->accommodate, -ed, -es, -tion, -tions, -ing"
r3m0t talk 13:55, Apr 3, 2005 (UTC)
:"anual->annual or anal, except "Anual" is a proper noun".  How is that machine readable?  maybe it should have way to add comments? - Omegatron 20:25, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)
::It should have a commenting method.  I will work on that.  In the meantime, let me know if working on commenting interferes with any programs, etc. — MATHWIZ2020 TALK | CONTRIBS 00:48, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The page had no standards, so I did the following:  Every line begins with a space, the misspelling, ->, the primary re-spelling, and then any additional spellings (separated by ", ").  Comments appear on the next line and begin with " *". — MATHWIZ2020 TALK | CONTRIBS 01:22, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: note

message: A remark/question: most lines end in a space. Is this intentional? It seems a little odd to me; my script has to explicitly strip this out. (Note that three lines do not currently end in a space). Lupin|talk|popups 15:37, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed all the trailing spaces. Hope it didn't break anybody's scripts. Wmahan. 02:25, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Format 

message: Here are some notes from my work on correcting spelling:
* The first thing I do is remove all entries with more than one suggested replacement, since these are more difficult to correct automatically.
* I treat each line that doesn't start with a space as a comment. That way there's no need for a special comment syntax.
* I use case-insensitive matches for the words in this list, so I can fix misspellings at the beginning of sentences. To fix case-sensitive misspellings and repeated words, I use an extended syntax where the first word is a PCRE.
And a couple of questions:
* Some of the entries are for misspelled contractions, such as didnt->didn't. The MOS says to avoid contractions except in quotations, so should we change these to didnt->did not, and so on?
* So I've collected about 1700 more misspellings that occur commonly on Wikipedia. Would anybody mind if I add them?
Wmahan. 20:37, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think we shouldn't have didnt->did not in the list. This list should just correct spellings, so that machines can deal with that and not have to worry about whether something is part of a quotation or not. Changing didn't to did not could be the topic of another list. Lupin|talk|popups 21:45, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Random notes 

message: I've removed the following lines:
    592: calender->calendar, calender..machine
   1018: cypher->cipher, cypher
   1043: decypher->decipher, decypher
   1044: decyphered->deciphered, decyphered
   1339: encypher->encipher,encypher
   1680: grat->great, grat..greet
   2893: protem->protem, protein
   3375: staring->staring, starring
   3920: wether->weather, whether, wether..sheep
These words are valid spellings, so should not be on this list. Some are obscure and very often misused, but since machines cannot easily distinguish proper from improper usage, I feel that they should not be on this list. Lupin|talk|popups 21:48, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed  colour->color because it is proper spelling for Commonwealthers. Xiong Chiamiov :: contact :: 22:02, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

text: dependant->dependent could be removed too --Netol (talk)  07:40, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Valid (but sometimes obscure words) removed 

message: Would it be possible to use this list to censor out swearing?
Eg. Fcuk -> F**k (Italics for obvious anti-swearing reason =D)
~  G1ggy!  Reply 04:28, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It would be possible, but no one wants to because people like that Wikipedia is not censored. Plus, it would mess up articles like Fuck. ALTON .ıl 07:50, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Swearing? 

message: Not to go against WP:BEANS, but if a vandal somehow found this page, the destruction would be disastrous. Do you guys think it would be appropriate to request semi-protection? --YbborTalk 03:10, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind; I guess it's already semi-protected, just missing the icon. Are there technical restrictions on adding it? --YbborTalk 22:41, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-Protect? 

message: One very common mistake that I see on Wikipedia is that of misplacing quotation marks. For example:
 Wrong: They were trained to respond "at a minutes warning".
 Right: They were trained to respond "at a minutes warning."
 Wrong: ...minuteman Paul Revere spread the news that "the regulars are coming", but was captured...
 Right: ...minuteman Paul Revere spread the news that "the regulars are coming," but was captured...
I know this is not a "spelling error" per se, but it is a typographical error nonetheless. In addition, I cannot conceive of any situation that the following would be used in a grammatically correct situation:
 ",
 ".
That being said, so long as it would be appropriate to put certain punctuation errors on this page (ones like this one that do not have exceptions--as many do), I think this would be a perfect candidate. Is punctuation appropriate material for this page? Andrew Nutter  Talk | Contribs  10:13, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia:MOS#Quotation_marks may explain why this "mistake" is so common. OrangeDog (talk) 01:12, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Alright, then I suppose that means Wikipedia believes it should use improper grammar, in which case I choose not to start a fruitless battle over it. Andrew Nutter  Talk | Contribs  00:02, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Punctuation 

message: Should despatch, despatched, ... be removed because the spelling is valid in British English? PleaseStand (talk) 00:41, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes.  Someone else has apparently deleted "despatch"; I just deleted "despatched".  ("Despatched" is, for example, used in "Feisty ferrets help net pests", an April 2010 article on Telegraph.co.uk, an arm of the well-established British newspaper.) --Closeapple (talk) 15:09, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  British spellings 

message: Please add labour -> labor to your list of common spelling mistakes. Thanks Cit helper (talk) 02:18, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Both are acceptable (British-U.S. difference, etc.) —fetch·comms 02:44, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

text: See WP:BritEng. —fetch·comms 02:57, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: And WP:MOSS. —fetch·comms 02:58, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please Add 

message: Came across this mistake just a few minutes ago. Not sure if it can be added to this list or not.
    payed -> played
--Hintswen  Talk | Contribs  02:19, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can this be added? 

message: Would there be a way to also include wiki errors such as this in the list?
JitteryOwl (talk) 22:39, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Markup errors

message: What about: Coca Cola->Coca-Cola ? Sander.v.Ginkel (talk) 12:48, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I think not many people read this, so I added it to the list. Sander.v.Ginkel (talk) 19:33, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:   Coca-Cola 

message: Much of this word list is in AWB's Typos project and it JavaScript implementation in WikEd.  Perhaps the remainder of the list should be merged there and this deprecated?  — Dispenser 18:22, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redundant with Typoscan 

message: There are differences and there is no point of two separate lists Bulwersator (talk) 09:11, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  I would suggest synchronising it with human-readable list 

message: Please add:
 colbalt->cobalt 59.100.7.215 (talk) 07:05, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: Where do you want this added. You'll need to be more specific in your proposed changes. Sakuura Cartelet Talk 02:18, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 28 April 2017 

message: Aka, a.k.a, AKA or A.K.A are all alternative spellings of the preposition and should not be included in the list of misspellings.
aka 
Wiktionary:aka 
RajkGuj (talk) 07:32, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove aka from the list 

message: I'm running into an issue using Lupin's Anti-Vandal Tool spellchecker that I run into a page with a possessives without apostrophes being flagged because they are in a web link. Unfortunately the tool only checks up to the first misspelling on the list with each page save, so you'll never get any spelling errors after the misspelling in the web link. If the list were ordered with missing apostrophe misspellings at the end of the list, we'd be able to catch those when they actually show up as misspellings in prose, but it wouldn't interfere with other misspellings when a missing apostrophe is in a web page link. I'm going to give this a couple days to see if anyone has an objection before I do this. VanIsaacWScont 16:13, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing apostrophes 

message: The list is bulkier than it needs to be...
"ammend"->"amend";
	can correct:
 amend, amended, amends, and amendment 
There are several other examples. Can someone fix the
"a", "b", "c", and all other lists?
Write your username here, and the letter you'll focus on. That way, we won't see duplicate changes.
Aera23 (talk) 08:20, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Compress 

message: Both are valid spellings. Not sure why it's added in this. Can we remove it? Amazingcaptain (talk) 18:39, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  glamourous->glamorous should be removed 

message: For example, I've written a plugin for Emacs based on Mickey Peterson's blog post on using this list to automatically correct spelling. Other text editor integration might also exist.
It's also totally possible that this is outside the scope of this page, which I understand. ~ acdw (talk) 14:33, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section on text editor integrations?