lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Designs on Jerry

message: Does anyone know what Tom 'says' when he walks out of the safe at the end? In every version I've seen, it's been pretty much unintelligible, but I wondered if it might have been actual dialogue in earlier editions? Can anyone help? Thanks :D ghostmoonEVPhauntings 01:16, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Tom's "speech"

message: There is an error mentioned in the censorship section. It says "Jerry smoking a cigarette is edited out from Boomerang in the UK.". It is Tom, not Jerry, that is seen smoking while daydreaming in this film. Please have this corrected.
98.254.83.35 (talk) 22:30, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. -Atmoz (talk) 22:48, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request from 98.254.83.35, 21 October 2010
Talk:Corey Hilliard

message: Is he related to former defensive back Randy Hilliard? Both are NFL vets from New Orleans, and they're about 18 years apart in age...worth checking out, I should think. Dozzzzzzzzzing off (talk) 16:17, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relation to Randy Hilliard?
Talk:Dennis Barrie

message: I'd be interested in who brought the prosecution, in what is known about their expressed or imputed reasons for doing so, in what organisations appeared to hold influence - if they were elected who paid their campaign expenses, if they were re-elected  ditto.  I'd be interested in the arguments, in short summary, and reasoning.  I'd be interested in the parallel if any with the Lady Chatterley's Lover trial - the DH Lawrence novel - in the UK, which changed the boundaries on mass publishing of print material, and allowed one's servants to read all sorts of stuff...  I live a long way away, and am not in a good position to actually dig that out and write the article myself, so here are some suggestions.  I'm also interested in where the people involved got to after, and perhaps in what they (say they) think about it.  Midgley (talk) 12:22, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Biochemical systems theory

message: I think this article wrongly depicts S systems. Introductory text:
"Biochemical systems theory is a mathematical modelling framework for biochemical systems, based on ordinary differential equations (ODE), in which biochemical processes are represented using power-law expansions in the variables of the system." S systems are not based on a process representation. So the processes are not "represented" by the power-laws, but implicitly contained in the power-laws.
The equation is wrong. This is the equation of mass action law. In S systems there is not a sum of term representing each process independently. There is a substraction of two power law products, one describing the creation of the compound and one describing the removal of the compound. The associated text says:
"The principal difference of power-law models with respect to other ODE models used in biochemical systems is that the kinetic orders can be non-integer numbers." 
This is not true because:
1) the main difference is the absence of process description. This is far more important than the kinetic orders.
2) more traditional ODE models also use non-integer orders. Some models even use time-dependent functions as orders! (e.g. models of binding and diffusion)
I am waiting a bit before incorporating corrections. Please discuss  Nicolas Le Novère (talk) 15:21, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  text and equation wrong 
Talk:Rajan–Nagendra

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Diannaa (talk) 00:53, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:Reid Stowe

message: Reference 42 is incorrect in that it refers to Soanya's transfer and not to the repair of the bowsprit. Here's what I think the reference ought to be: https://web.archive.org/web/20141101190638/http://1000days.net/home/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=132&Itemid=70 Can someone fix this? I don't know how to do it. John Link (talk) 03:57, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I just happened to see this note. I will make the correction now. You are perfectly correct, John Link: the reference should have been the Day 22 Log, not employing the "ref name" from another entry. Skol fir (talk) 18:14, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you, Skol fir.  John Link (talk) 15:58, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference 42 incorrect
Talk:SUNY Erie

message: This page was blanked to remove nonsensical entry that was drawing further silly comments. Stepp-Wulf (talk) 02:55, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Any word on what ECC's endowment or operating budget is? 76.180.19.184 (talk) 02:56, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Endowment 
Talk:Riza Talabani

message: Rezza should be changed to Reza as this is how the name is usually spelled. 
Reza returns 2,100,000 and most of the top results related to the Iranian name. 
Rezza returns 109,000 results, almost none relate to the Iranian name besides this one.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by RainbowJack (talk • contribs) 23:32, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of the article
Talk:Nitrium (Star Trek)

message: Invoking WP:IAR, I am placing a redirect.  A concensus was reached with all authors and the AfD submitter.  Normally, an admin would do this, but this action just saves admin labour.  the WP:IAR part is that usually an AfD tag should remain in place but the redirect reverts it.VK35 22:11, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect
Talk:The Transformers: The Movie (Original Motion Picture Soundtrack)

message: *I'm pretty much positive these songs were not performed by Rush. They should all be by Stan Bush or the other guy (Vince something).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.123.234.31 (talk) 20:44, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong Artist Listed 
Talk:Asshole (song)

message: Should it be noted that the song is popular in the internet due to a GTA San Andreas video with the song? Just put "GTA San Andreas I'm an Asshole" on youtube or google and you'll see what I mean. Kanzler31 (talk) 19:30, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Can't see how that is really relevant to the article. Quiksilver4Eyes (talk) 18:30, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not. And there's a lot of videos using video game footage set to the song, including Halo, Battlefield 2 and a bunch more. None are all that notable, and really ah e no impact on the song. oknazevad (talk) 04:43, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  GTA San Andreas video
Talk:Black Cadillac (film)

message: I suggest a new heading to address the psychological aspects of this iconic American thriller. Maybe call it, "Psychological Aspects". It could discuss the subtleties of the relationship between the three protagonists; the ultra-nuanced language between them and the trooper; how the single source of terror, the black Cadillac, could rationally be supposed to be doing all these terrifying deeds for any number of reasons; the intricacies of the plot and how thought patterns can interact with elements of the plot. This excellent film really deserves more in-depth exploration.
The heading I propose is only a suggestion. There's probably a better title for the content I find missing,  I just couldn't think of it.  However, the mind bending and relentless mind games are a defining characteristic of this work of art, and I surely hope that either an excellent writer or an excellent psychologist,  or perhaps a collaboration, will step forward to fill in this gap in the Wikipedia entry for Black Cadillac. 66.173.7.27 (talk) 02:35, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECTS
Talk:Beatriz Sarlo

message: I'm 95% certain that Sarlo is no longer at the UBA.  I believe that she resigned after losing the vote for something like a distinguished professorship.  It was quite a scandal at the time.  See here for one account.  It is just possible that more recently she has re-joined the university, but I doubt it.  --jbmurray (talk • contribs) 00:46, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  current position
Talk:LIP (company)

message: I removed the following as it is badly translated and does not make sense Racklever 22:20, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Somy Ali

message: First of all, a lot of information on this page comes from the so called 'official website' of the personality in question. The whole article was copy pasted from this website and shoddily edited. I have attempted to rewrite bits and parts. The article included statements like X enjoyed media attention as she was dating Y, when the actress has done 9 films and now runs her own charity. 
This article needs to be completely rewritten, with proper sources and more recent references. ThisIsMyAlterEgo (talk) 09:18, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too many problems with this article
Talk:Churches in Sycamore Historic District

message: I have completed a merger of the church articles related to Sycamore Historic District, commercial buildings will be next. The way I am judging this is overall length of articles and relative importance. It isn't practical to merge articles which are decently long or those which could easily become so based upon easily available source material. This merger consisted of five separate pages and a section from the main article. The old histories are still available for each article at the redirect, they are, as follows:
*First Baptist Church (Sycamore, Illinois): 
*Old Congregational Church (Sycamore, Illinois): 
*St. Peter's Episcopal Church (Sycamore, Illinois): 
*St. Mary's Roman Catholic Church (Sycamore, Illinois): 
*Universalist Church/Arthur Stark House: 
Since I was the original author the GFDL concerns are minimal anyway, but there they are anyway.
IvoShandor 22:42, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger
Talk:Pamela Rabe

message: This needs references and more content.Reallyso (talk) 18:55, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nicely done. How is a category added? Wish I knew, seeing the absence of categories here. 82.141.119.188 (talk) 11:49, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Just added "Category:Canadian actors". Not sure which others would be appropriate. 85.217.15.248 (talk) 05:09, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lady-in-waiting

message: So what do lady in waitings do?
The plural is "ladies-in-waiting", dear. And don't forget the hyphens. As for what they "do", the question is answered in the first sentence of the article. They act as personal attendants to female royalty. 
:Yes indeed, but it does not give any examples as to wath that actually means. Give examples! For example: "The task of a lady-in-waiting is to follow the queen when she walk through a room." --85.226.44.201 (talk) 15:09, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tasks 

message: Can someone please tell me what type of garments did these women wear? Were they colorful? Did they have gold running thru them or were they just tattered clothing?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.233.112.228 (talk) 01:13, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, in some countrys, they were actually a form of "unifrom", as speciall dress code, for this position. --85.226.44.201 (talk) 15:10, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dress 

message: ladies-in-waiting were divided into four separate systems: great ladies, ladies of the privy chamber, Maids of Honour and chamberers. The ladies of the privy chamber were the ones who were closest to the queen and thought to be the highest level of unpaid ladies-in-waiting. Most of the other women were considered Maids of Honour. The Maids of honour were the single, unmarried ladies-in-waiting.
These sentences are so confused that I can't figure out the meaning, let alone how to rearrange them.
I'll try to list the oddities, and maybe someone else with more understanding of the language and more intuition can fix them.
# There are four kinds of lady listed, but:
## only two are more or less described, the other two ("great ladies" and "chamberers") are completely forgotten after this first list
## you would assume that these are in order of rank of some sort, but later it says that the "ladies of the privy chamber" are the most important, which are listed after the "great ladies"
# "thought to be the highest level of unpaid ladies-in-waiting"
## "thought to be" implies that they actually weren't, or that at least it was questionable. Instead, nothing is said about that
## "of unpaid" means that other ladies were paid? It doesn't say anything about that either
# "Most of the other women were considered Maids of Honour"
## "most"? "considered"? So it wasn't official? Or it was?
# "The Maids of honour were the single, unmarried ladies-in-waiting"
## now you're just kidding me. This sentence is incompatible with the previous one. The "Maids of honour" were automatically the unmarried ones? So what is the previous sentence supposed to mean?
--Lo'oris (talk) 11:44, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: since no one gave a shit, I just removed the section. It was so confused that it wasn't useful anyway. --Lo'oris (talk) 11:19, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confused sentences 

message: Near top of article, shouldn't this be queen regnant (to contrast with queen consort)?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.72.144.66 (talk) 03:44, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  queen regent ?
Talk:Charles McPherson (musician)

message: The Charles Mingus album "My Favorite Quintet" is given as 1964, but wasn't recorded until May 1965. I don't know when it was released, but I can check. I'm inexperienced so am not sure what an acceptable source is: an online discography? a discography from e.g. Brian Priestley's biography of Mingus? Chris1729 (talk) 15:08, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  My Favorite Quintet
Talk:Frankenstein 1970

message: Warner Archive recently re-released Karloff and Lugusi Horror Classics as a DVD-R and also released this film separately in the same format. Just thought someone'd like to know, as it needs to be included.Malcolmlucascollins (talk) 01:24, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Then include it -- if you have a reliable source to support it. Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:18, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Home video section recent news
Talk:Rogation days

message: I understand these were also known as "Gang Days". Origin of this name? Drutt (talk) 23:21, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: "to gang" is an archiac verb meaning "to walk".Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 14:29, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Or simply "to go", as in "gang aft agley" (often go awry).  Vaughan Pratt (talk) 19:49, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gang days 

message: Right. I've trawled through reference 19 again. I missed out a few parts. Firstly, I had forgotten the original quote that tied the ritual to slave holders, namely:
::[T]he keeping of important English days and seasons marked a difference between those who claimed the rights of British subjects and their slaves.
I also missed out the bit where the British also did this in Barbados and Jamaica, as well as what is now South Carolina. All it says regarding their version of Rogation though is fasting. No other reports on how else it was celebrated. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 16:40, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Slave holders and my idiocy (part of an ongoing series)

message: does the'difference' between "Rogation Sunday" and "Rogate Sunday" originate in a difference between English and German?  Or is it people translating the original word in different or sloppy ways? 209.128.15.129 (talk) 15:20, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anglican and Lutheran
Talk:The Robot vs. the Aztec Mummy

message: Where is the information on the first film?--Paleface Jack (talk) 23:08, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The discussion of mummies is totally wrong. There are no mummies in this movie. The man who becomes the Aztec mummy is buried ALIVE to punish him for wanting to deflower the virgin who is supposed to be sacrificed to the gods. He was not mummified; he wasn’t even dead. 2601:441:4D00:5960:608A:B88C:2D0B:B23D (talk) 18:38, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mummies
Talk:Cronartium ribicola

message: Last year I was working on a survey of C. ribicola infections in high elevation pines in California.  We noticed what looked like telia on Castilleja spp.  The sample was sent to the U.S. Forest Service's Forest Genetics Lab and Det Vogler has confirmed that the telia was from C. ribicola.  One would really have to be a geek to care, but it looks like Castilleja spp. can also carry C. ribicola.  SierraSkier 22:41, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

message: This is very important species, the new deal itrradication programs, the highest irradication money on any fungus for forestry, change in US policy in 20th century). A lot more should be written on this.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.244.120.75 (talk) 12:50, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: mossing info
Talk:Barney Rosenzweig

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://careers.usc.edu/events/_m/bios/entertainment_bios.pdf. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:12, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Samtrak

message: When biking along the Springwater Corridor trail (wow, is there really no article for that??! Must rectify!), I occasionally see a 2- or 3-car freight train go by. I think this is the same section of track as this article concerns, through Oaks Bottom. Anyone know what those trains are all about, who operates them, etc? -Pete 18:36, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  A question
Talk:Jim Gerald

message: At least half this article appears to be a word for word lift from the Australian Dictionary of Biography article, without citation, dating back to the article's creation in 2008. Or am I seeing things? Nickm57 (talk) 07:27, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  I have added reference to the ADB biography on Gerald, from which much of this article is stolen. I will start to deal with the outrageous plagiarism over the next few days. It will involve reducing the article. Also, many of the claims - eg: the 30 films in the US in 1928 and the connection to uncle's circus, have also long since been dismissed.Nickm57 (talk) 23:07, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I have spent some time cleaning this up. It's not perfect and requires more work, but it could not stay as it was. Feel free to contribute Nickm57 (talk) 06:54, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Word for word lift from ADB?
Talk:London airport

message: We have two articles with the same name. This one, however, lacks the capital "A" on airport. Also, since it is primarily a disambiguation page, this page seems more to offer 'travel advice' rather than geographic information. IMHO, the L.A. page i currently clearer. Graldensblud 22:52, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?
Talk:Unitary Urbanism

message: Why was it decided to use capital letters in the article title despite the use of lower case in the text?  That conflicts with Wikipedia:Manual of Style.  I tried to move it to the lower-case title, but find that that existed as a stub and not merely as a redirect.  I could just delete it, but then the other article's history would be lost.  Does anyone know how to merge the histories? Michael Hardy 22:53, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Kirill Lavrov

message: I have removed a massive copy-paste from http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0492253/bio to prevent the whole article from being deleted. Yury Petrachenko 07:03, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio 

message: The article needs more updates and cleanup. Stage career added and other additions and corrections were made. Film career mistakes removed. With respect to all wiki editors, Kotofski (talk) 20:51, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup
Talk:London Airport

message: Big A or small a. One or other, at least, surely? Suggest this page has the better formatting at present, for what is a disambiguation page not an actual article. Graldensblud 22:54, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?

message: It might be usefull if this (or another) page contained information on which airport to choose, to travel to london. How do they compare?
:Also, could a map be made to show the location of most of these airports? -- Jokes Free4Me 06:06, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: And could someone please fix the position of Stansted on the map? Right now it looks like it somewhere around Wisbech, and that's way to far north.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.114.49.96 (talk) 18:47, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Which one to choose?

message: How to fix this? The coordinate in the source code is correct, but there seems to be some sort of bug:
| label4=Stansted | pos4=right| lat4=51.885 | long4=0.235
| label5=Luton | pos5=left| lat5=51.874722 | long5=-0.368333
The above means that Stansted should be only very slightly north of Luton. But on the map it appears to be more like 52.8N, i.e. about 100 km off to the north. And no matter what you set the "lat5" value to, the label stays at its current position......
--Dekthep (talk) 14:44, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I fixed it. Someone had attempted to add Southend, but used lat4 instead of lat7 - so the value for lat4 there overrode the one in the line for Stansted. (And the Southend figures were wrong too.) M0ffx (talk) 02:48, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stansted position on map
Talk:Benelli M1

message: I am curious what the chief difference is between an M1 Super 90 and an M2 Super 90?
Might mention the early HK manufactured M1 S90.  I'm not sure but I believe the M2 had pump + semi auto since the M1 couldn't cycle sub-lethal rounds
---- Pink_Talon ----  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pink talon (talk • contribs) 03:04, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening comment 

message: Due to the inertia recoil system, the M1 should use heavier loads to cycle properly but because the action is inertia driven vs. the traditional gas cycling operation it can fire and reliably cycle lighter loads.
That sentence seems to contradict itself.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.57.108.227 (talk) 07:16, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: contradictory sentence

message: Presumably copyrighted material has been removed from the article and the log. --Alvestrand 20:54, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright issue resolved