lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Dwight Freeney

message: I didn't realize magazine covers don't always qualify for fair use (there is discussion on this on several other athlete pages), so I've removed the image once again. -Big Smooth 01:40, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: SI cover image

message: Hey, dipshit? Freeny plays for the colts. Go watch a re-run of the super bowl if you don't believe me. He's the dude to the left of Chicago's QB. His names on his uniform and everything. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lettuceclock (talk • contribs) 20:55, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dolphin Vandalism 

message: Why is he listed as a billionaire with no source?  Removed that for now  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.238.6.13 (talk) 06:13, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Billionaire? 
Talk:Reserved identifier

message: I have deleted most of this page because it's completely untrue.  The former version describes a number of tokens defined in standard headers such as <strings.h> as reserved when in fact they are simply identifiers that are used in a particular library function.   It's no more true that those are 'reserved' than (say) 'glBegin' from the OpenGL library.  It's perfectly legal to use those tokens yourself if you do not choose to use the standard string library.
IMHO, this page should probably be deleted entirely.   In order to be meaningful or useful, it needs to discuss the overall concept of reserved identifiers first, then (if necessary) discuss several programming languages.
SteveBaker 02:09, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur that this article is useless. Suggest redirect to Reserved word which is a better stub. 67.130.129.135 (talk) 00:48, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Convair F2Y Sea Dart

message: In the "aircontent" box, the pre-1962 designation sequence entry isn't showing, only the post-1962 one. For this a/c they both should be visible... - Aerobird 15:55, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Houston, we have a... 

message: In the late 1970s, my father took me to an airshow at Pax River.  I saw a Sea Dart on the ramp, neglected. This was when the F-18 was first undergoing acceptance / evaluation testing, all white and it put on a great show. That was during a time I thought Convair designs were sexy.  CredibleSources (talk) 02:40, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pax River
Talk:Mirza Kuchik Khan

message: I attempted the merger, didn't work technically, the message is "that page already exists ...", this has been discussed enough and is OK to do.Gmotamedi 02:30, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The man founded a soviet socialist republic and tried to separate Gilan from Iran and join it with the USSR. He therefore most certainly was not a nationalist, and using the term hero is unverfiable and unencyclopedic anyway. The article seems to be copied from Islamic republic textbooks rather than proper sources. Shervink 14:52, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nationalist hero?

message: `Kuchak` means `small` in Turkic languages, in the case of Iran it is Azeri Turkic language.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.106.174.94 (talk) 09:47, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: About the nickname
Talk:Function of several complex variables

message: The course catalog. --SilverMatsu (talk) 03:19, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A memo about the structure of the section 

message: The definition of a coherent sheaf is given as follows:
"A coherent sheaf on a ringed space (X, \mathcal O_X) is a sheaf \mathcal F satisfying the following two properties:
 \mathcal F is of finite type over \mathcal O_X, that is, every point in X has an open neighborhood U in X such that there is a surjective morphism \mathcal{O}_X^n|_{U} \to \mathcal{F}|_{U}  for some natural number n;
 for arbitrary open set U\subseteq X, arbitrary natural number n, and arbitrary morphism \varphi: \mathcal{O}_X^n|_{U} \to \mathcal{F}|_{U}  of \mathcal O_X-modules, the kernel of \varphi is of finite type."
But what does the superscript n mean in the symbol "\mathcal{O}_X^n|_{U}"?
The article does not say, and nothing in the linked article ringed space uses this notation.
I can guess two distinct possibilities for what "\mathcal{O}_X^n|_{U}" means.
I hope someone knowledgeable about this subject can explain the notation and avoid having thousands of future readers of Wikipedia also have to guess what it means. 2601:200:C082:2EA0:E1A8:CCAE:61A1:827C (talk) 02:25, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please say what you mean by superscript n
Talk:Green Run High School

message: There was a "citation needed" tag for the fact that he had gone to this school. He is on page 215 of my 1981 yearbook, so I am citing that as a source.JeffStickney (talk) 20:54, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added reference for David Robinson 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.greenrunhs.vbschools.com/school/crest.asp, http://www.greenrunhs.vbschools.com/school/index.asp. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Dianna (talk) 16:34, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: Should the collegiate school be split from the high school or given its own section? See Draft:Green Run Collegiate AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:39, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split collegiate?
Talk:Dingbat (building)

message: * Earthquake safety
**I was just coming here to suggest mentioning that the structure that fell down in the Northridge earthquake was a dingbat; although apparently it was not built to code, and similar buildings nearby were not affected so severely.  Might be useful info at the daunting Seismic retrofit.  — Catherine\talk 03:24, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Topics to cover

message: Ok, having lived in "dingbats" for fifteen years in LA, I find this article (more than) a bit biased toward the negative. At least that's my first impression.  Statements such as "Like a great deal of American vernacular architecture—Quonset huts and storefront churches come to mind—dingbats are meant to be purposeful, not lovable" is POV.  The Apple Pan is vernacular, but completely loveable from some POV's. 
There also needs to be more citations in general and a few positive ones showing another perspective would be give it some balance.  I also find there's too many generalizations, but maybe that's a product of the negativity. Or maybe my bias based on my former neighborhood.  Also, the picture needs to indicate that this is a rear view (I believe) and the addition of a front view would be helpful.  I'd also choose a building with more parking bays, say four, which according to the article, is the average.OwenSaunders (talk) 02:26, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, this article needs something of an attitude adjustment. I'm working on it. Dreamyshade (talk) 05:21, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 

message: Wow this style of apartment building is extremely common in Melbourne throughout dozens of the older suburbs, where they replaced older houses that were on large blocks. Everything is the same, the general look, size, layout, cursive script building names based on the name of the street, suburb, or some obviously untrue/outlandish idea such as "Royal Apartments", "Bella Vista", "Luxury Towers". Only thing different is that the name "dingbat" is never used or even heard of. They do not really have a particular name here and tend to simply be called "1960s flats". Format (talk) 21:15, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Melbourne, Australia

message: In Chicago these are called a four-plus-one. They have the some structural characteristics, but not the  Mid-Century modern and kitsch aesthetic. BradVesp (talk) 11:34, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Four-plus-one
Talk:Colorado Avalanche–Detroit Red Wings brawl

message: It is still one of the most memorable brawls in sports history and probably the most memorable in hockey history.
I agree.  Perhaps as time goes on, it will mean less.  But right now, it continues to be a memorable moment especially for the Avalanche and the Red Wings, a notable hockey rivalry. 
Theaterdude88 01:17, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  It's Notable 

message: I can't believe that this is the only Wikipedia arcticle about an NHL brawl. If someone would add more, maybe, that would be great. 24.83.3.54 22:31, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Only One 

message: I took out a sentence that stated Osgood threw down Roy. That's nonsense.  Osgood was pushing Roy back and so Roy fell against the boards.  No one who saw the fight, and is objective, would have said Roy was thrown down.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.240.96.109 (talk) 23:59, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Osgood threw Roy down? 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: Not Moved - Although not explicit, Wikipedia:Naming conventions (ice hockey) implies titles should include the city name Mike Cline (talk) 16:58, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Colorado Avalanche–Detroit Red Wings brawl →  – The Penguins–Islanders brawl was moved back to its original title after undergoing a move such as this, due to the fact that adding the geographical names was wholly unnecessary. This article should follow suit as well. 2601:282:300:98:BD92:F012:50B7:7BBD (talk) 03:07, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
*Oppose delighted that the above was declined WP:RECOGNIZABLE. In ictu oculi (talk) 10:19, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 10 May 2016
Talk:Happy Valley, Hong Kong

message: This page says trams started going to Happy Valley in 1930, while the Chinese page says 1904. Can someone verify which one, if any, is correct? - deadkid_dk 03:04, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Trams

message: I just noticed how this is tagged for verification. It isn't something that you can get much more of a source for than the actual plaque on the wall which states it. I vouch for it as I see it a couple of times a week when I go to the store. Also the 7/11 offices are above the store, which shows that it is a pretty important store. Can we remove the tag now or do we need photo evidence of the plaque?--Peej 12:43, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  7 /11 store
Talk:Battle of Ruspina

message: I think this article could use a serious revamp. This is supposed to be the article for the Battle of Ruspina, but it's almost entirely about the background for the War of the First Triumvirate, with only 3 sentences at the end about the battle itself. The background information is good overall, but this isn't the article it belongs in. 198.202.68.212 (talk) 19:55, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  revamp
Talk:Battle of Gainsborough

message: From other links I'd suggest 27th July 1643. Is this correct? 124.184.92.64 05:06, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know about the date, but I was under the impression that the the final stage of the battle was closer to Lea marsh than to Foxby Hill. [Pete Spindley]  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.35.131.23 (talk) 13:54, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  When did this battle occur? 

message: The lead: A short-lived attempt to capture it for Parliament was defeated by Charles Cavendish.
The box: Parliamentarians victory. Creuzbourg (talk) 18:42, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who won? 

message: "Seeing this, Cromwell, Major Whalley and three troops of Royalist horse attacked Cavendish and his reserve from the rear."
This doen't make sense as it stands. Surely "Royalist horse" should read "Parliamentary horse". If anyone can confirm, please make the change or conform here and I will. Mike Spathaky (talk) 18:57, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  My error. I rewrote a portion of the paragraph a while back and indeed I made the mistake. Good catch! I will change it right now. Thanks! Virgil Fairchild VFF0347 (talk) 22:06, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Battle
Talk:Andrew Hamilton

message: Is it a good idea to move the page to Andrew Hamilton (disambiguation)?  CoolGuy 18:27, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There's no need to.  We use that format when one meaning of the term so predominates that its article should be located there.  For example, we need to call a page "Howard Baker (disambiguation)" because the title "Howard Baker" is used for the article about the former Senator.  In the present case, however, there's no one Andrew Hamilton who's so prominent that the Andrew Hamilton article should be about him.  Therefore, that title is available for the dab page. JamesMLane t c 18:56, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Makes sense.  Just wanted to see if there was any guidelines on this.  CoolGuy 19:20, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move page? 

message: I added today Andres Hamilton, Irish composer of contemporary music, but that was quickly changed to American composer of classical music. Is there also an American composer of the same name? The only one I know about, and referred to, is this guy. Bertilvidet 21:49, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Which American composer?
Talk:Kinetic sculpture race

message: I have moved the prominent "Racer Information" section to this page, since it contains nothing but broken links. SpencerBarrett, if you wish to create pages with information for racers, you are welcome to do so!  I propose, however, that links to racer information should be listed lower on the page than the list of locations, which is of interest to a much larger audience in an encyclopedia. --Spril4 (talk) 15:53, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Racer Information
Talk:Indoor cricket

message: Though I acknowledge it is without complete consensus, discussions elsewhere with Py0alb have resulted in him agreeing to 'settle' for each form of the game in its own article. Therefore, this article has returned to referring to the international version of indoor cricket, though it now refers to the UK variant at the top of the article and several places within it (most notably in 'origin and development' and in 'other forms of the game').
I would suggest that any changes to this arrangement could be considered controversial and should probably be discussed here first.
For reference, the 'settled' articles are (at time of writing) here (international version) and here (UK variant). The 'unified' version that caused this controversy is here.
Note that this 'settlement' refers only to the arrangement of the two formats in separate articles, and not to the content (or the verifiability of that content) within the articles. Editors should feel free to continue to help build both articles with notable and verifiable content :)
in2itive (talk) 01:19, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: A resolution (of sorts)

message: A key citation in this article linking to http://www.aol.in/cricket/story/2007090623039016000001/internationalmusic is expired and has been since at least Dec 2011 (see unsigned comment above). I added the citation originally (back in 2008), and wrote the history section based on it. Unfortunately I cannot find a cached version of the page, and all pages similar to it now reference this article - circular referencing.
I will continue to look for other primary sources that support the article, but suggest we leave as is for the moment. in2itive (talk) 20:57, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course, as soon as I posted on the talk page I found an updated link to the Cricinfo article I had originally cited. The citation has been updated to reflect the new link - this can be disregarded. in2itive (talk) 21:16, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expired reference 
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/WebEx and Min Zhu

message: There has been a debate involving myself and user User:Just zis Guy, you know? on Talk:WebEx about whether it is OK 
to add the sentence " Zeleny alleges that Zhu retired in response to the publicity surrounding his publishing his daughter's allegations of sexual abuse" to the article, with the source for this being Zeleny's own livejournal. I hope the final decision 
will clarify who is right on this matter, i.e. whether using a primary source in this way satisfies WP:RS or not. --Pierremenard 03:16, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is Zeleny's livejournal an acceptable source for allegations made by Zeleny? =

message: I request that all Wikipedia articles edited by User:Larvatus to reflect his POV about Min Zhu, Erin Zhu, and WebEx be reviewed and subject to the findings of  this arbitration case. I have identified 10 articles started or expanded by Larvatus with POV content.  Min Zhu and WebEx per this case. And Blixa Bargeld, Einstürzende Neubauten, New Enterprise Associates, and Coverup. Plus Subrah Iyar, Scott Sandell, Erin Zhu, and Michael Zeleny that were deleted by Afd on 12/29. Also, a finding about User:Larvatus may be needed to clarify articles content vs. user page content. It would be wise to explicitly deal with all these articles at the same time. Thank you.--FloNight 17:54, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Request to include 8 more related articles

message: I am the original contributor of "controversial" content to the WebEx article (). I vouch that Mr. Zeleny's edits on this subject are verified by court filings. I personally examined many volumes of these filings in the Los Angeles and Santa Clara courthouses from 2004 onwards. They are open to the public. Other editors can do what I did. I agree that "Larvatus"'s remarks in defense of his statements have often been borderline discourteous. However, the same applies to the "flash mob" participants that jumped on this case since last December. Assumptions of good faith should cut both ways. The "Zeleny/Zhu/WebEx" legal documents posted on Wikisource are a valuable disclosure of corporate wrongdoing. These documents are part of public record, but many of them are prohibitively priced. When I tried to get transcripts from court stenographers, they quoted fees in the range of thousands of dollars per complete copy. The proposed rule for excluding parties in lawsuits from contributing to Wikipedia articles about these lawsuits would deny access to these important documents to the Wikipedia community. It is against public interest to close Wikipedia to verifiable information about public controversies. Henryuzi 06:43, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "LARVATUS"'S EDITS CHECK OUT
Talk:Lamborghini V12

message: There is the statement compare the 3.5 liter V12 to the 3.7 liter V8 engine in the 1968 Chevy Camaro which produced 140 bhp, but when we look at the Chevrolet Camaro page there are a number of engines listed for 1967-1969 including:
* 3.8 L Inline-6 engine: 140 hp
* 4.0 L Inline-6 engine: 155 hp
* Z28 4.9 L V8: rated 290 hp, dyno readings: 360 to 400 hp
* 5.4 L V8: 210 hp
* 5.4 L V8: 275 hp
* 5.7 L V8: 255 hp
* 5.7 L V8: 290 hp
* 6.5 L V8: 325 hp
* 6.5 L V8: 350 hp
Can we assume a typograpical error, as Chevrolet did not seem to have a 3.7 liter V8 engine? In this case, we can consider the base 3.8L Inline-6 or the 5.4 L (327) V8 with 210/275 hp which might be considered to be the beginning of the Camaro performance options. Later Camaro V8 engines rated in net power and with emissions controls were less powerful. e.g. 1975 350 (5.7 L) V8 engines producing 145 hp or 155 hp.
Or maybe some other Chevrolet Small-Block engine might make a better comparison?  --Xagent86 03:25, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Since I added the comments above, the article has been updated to state the comparison is with a 3.6 liter Inline-6 engine (not V8), so those comments/criticisms are no longer relevant, although the Chevrolet Camaro page lists a 3.8L I6 rather than a 3.6L I6. I will correct this to show it as 3.8L I6. --Xagent86 06:40, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Compare 3.5 litre V12

message: On the list of Volkswagen Group petrol engines article, the Lamborghini V12 is detailed.  However, there is some confusion/dispute on the 'vital statistics' of the 6.5 litre engine.  I placed the 'disputed section' banner on the article, and raised the comments on the talk page for that article.  Perhaps someone can find the correct measurements etc, regards.  78.32.143.113 (talk) 18:54, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Dispute / confusion over 6.5 dimensions

message: Therefore, it needs its own article. I have removed it from this one. Perhaps the new article should be called "Lamborghini Aventador Engine" or "Volkswagen Group V12" or "Audi-Lamborghini V12"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.221.183.199 (talk) 18:30, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Aventador's engine is a totally new motor not related to this V12 
Talk:Color commentator

message: I would appreciate it if you could just send me a text when you are free thanks 2603:8001:1300:CEC6:25DD:42B8:D997:D328 (talk) 15:27, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  I played a round of golf with you and you let me use your golf club 

message: "...the phrase "color commentator" is now rarely used in American English as the role is now more commonly known in the USA as "game analyst" or "match analyst"."
I would love to see some backup on this; the only place "game analyst" would be used would be on a resume or by another talking head. "Color Commentator" is totally common American English. Iroll (talk) 05:00, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation Please