lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Nine Times That Same Song

message: I'm removing the prod template.  I've never heard of the band or the album myself, but a Google search (with quotes) gets 558 hits, and Pitchfork saying it's the 16th best album of the year seems like enough to make it notable.  I'm leaving the notability tag, though... If I understand the policies right, my personal opinion is enough to remove the prod tag, while something more like consensus would be needed to remove the notability tag.  Please correct me if I've misunderstood.  --Allen 21:50, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removing prod tag
Talk:Warner Village Cinemas

message: The Warner Village Cinema in Cambridge at the Grafton Centre opened in 1995. I know this as I remember watching films that were released in 1995 there. They also celebrated their 10 year anniversary last year.
Did they originally trade under a different name or group, or is this article incorrect?
--82.109.228.38 21:56, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The chain dates back to the 1980s (if not earlier), but they originally traded as Warner cinemas; the "Village" branding didn't appear until the mid-90s. 220.157.83.11 11:00, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Obscure detail that is very central to my life, but really not to anyone else's
Talk:Cash and carry (disambiguation)

message: Could someone who is an expert in military history/politics provide more detail in this section please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.50.9.157 (talk • contribs) 22:01, 4 February 2006. (UTC)
:The Cash and Carry Act kept the U.S. neutral in a way because they did not have ships in the sea, since the country had to carry their own weapons back. Not having ships shipping the weapons made sure that the U.S would not go into war since they would not be attacked. (The bombing of the Lusitania ship was one of the main causes for the U.S entering WWI.)  Other ways the Cash and Carry broke the U.S's nutrality acts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.33.142.228 (talk • contribs) 01:12, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:   U.S. neutrality acts 

message: Confederate_States_of_America mentions cash and carry. Should it be mentioned here? Xiner (talk, email) 22:38, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's no longer mentioned in the article.  The 28 January 2007 version of the article mentioned cash and carry in the lead but not the body. There was no source/citation and so we don't know if the term was used during the civil war era or was a modern writer's description of the practice. --Marc Kupper|talk 05:21, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Civil War 
Talk:Michael Byrne (sailor)

message: We might want to turn this into a disambiguation page.  Michael Byrne the actor is somewhat well known. --Mrwojo 22:15, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambig? 
Talk:Saint Michaels, Maryland

message: The article shows the town was named #8 of the Top Ten Romantic Escapes in the USA. I am wondering where is the best place to list this information? I did not know if it belonged in the introduction, history section etc.. Thank you--BuzyBody (talk) 23:06, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Town Ranking 

message: Why are there two Commons category boxes in the References area?
Why is the DEFAULTSORT set to "Saint Michaels, Louisiana"?
--Joe Sewell (talk) 16:33, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sorting & Commons
Talk:Anime Evolution

message: I will be making edits and additions to this article as I am directly involved with this organization. I sat on the board of directors for two years, and currently run their website and assist a current director. I have been involved for nearly 5 years now. Colin Keigher 01:52, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've actually read this article for a change instead of giving it the brief skimming that I normally do. Most of the information on the article has the stench of original research, which should bee cleared up. I've already remove some OR and unverifiable information which gave an opinion about the con's future and an event that was declared "most popular". --Farix (Talk) 02:49, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original Research 

message: As an executive of Anime Evolution, I can assert that AE is not looking to move off of SFU's burnaby campus anytime within the near future as it meets our needs.
If this anonymous post is not sufficient, I can create a login and reference e-mails.
:The entire section is unreferenced anyways. If no one cites any sources in the next couple of weeks, it can be removed. --Farix (Talk) 03:45, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anime Evolution/akakon
Talk:Phourni

message: http://projectsx.dartmouth.edu/classics/history/bronze_age/cgi-bin/image.cgi?path=img_template.html&image=%31%30%2D%35&desc=Archanes%2E+Phourni%2E+View+of+EM%2DLM+Cemetery+from+Mt%2E+Iuktas+%28WSW%29%2E+&cred=Dartmouth%2C+Classics+Department%0A&les=%31%30&title=Middle+Minoan+Crete%0A&stitle=Middle+Minoan+Crete%0A+Images link showing Phourni from Iouktas
incorporate "horse sacrifice" into article - was infuriating trying to find which tomb site had evidence of horse sacrifice via Google today. --Damate
What is the significance of this specific Minoan cemetery? Emlang22 (talk) 00:12, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Go opening strategy

message: It seems that the concpets used in this article need to be unified.  The "opening" in "Chinese opening", "fuseki" in "sugou fuseki",  "style" in "Shusaku style" (there is already an article named Shusaku opening), and  "formation" in "mini-chinese formation", are same.  Why use so many different names? In Chinese, we call all of them as "xx 流开局" (literally meaning, "xx style opening") or simply "xx 流" (xx style).  I think we can unify these concepts as "opening".  That will avoid unnecessary confusion.  And I don't think that mini-Chinese formation (opening? fuseki?) is just a side, not "whole-board", opening.  If so, then Chinese opening is also a side opening.  It's also an opening at one side. What's the distinction? --Neo-Jay 22:26, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No. 'Formation' in the mini-chinese is one thing, but there is also a famous whole-board opening based around the mini-chinese. 'Shusaku style' for Japanese pro players means a whole way of playing, not just the 1-3-5 formation. I could go into this in the article. I do recognise the 'style' character - the Japanese read it 'ryu', I think, and they also use it for personal style, in the sense of Takagawa-style, Sakata-style and so on. You can see in my web series at  how these are different. For example I say 'Shimamura's formation', 'Chinese style' and so on. Charles Matthews 23:09, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you.  --Neo-Jay 23:24, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Need to unify the concepts

message: I recommend a merge between this article and Go_opening_theory. 128.6.175.15 14:00, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree. We have had discussions about this already. Charles Matthews 17:11, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I fail to see a significant distinction and the articles seem to duplicate content IMO, but I restrained myself from invoking the merge request again... -- EmperorBMA|話す 21:07, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

text: Well, I have to ask how much you know about all this. Charles Matthews 22:25, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Ill Niño

message: New addition is Miggy Sanchez who is also the front man of Nu metal act Relent . 2600:1700:3541:CC30:B541:DD8:8FEF:848A (talk) 01:08, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have a source to support this claim? Also, the band itself is not notable, so there's no reason to mention it at all. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:02, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  New percussionist / vocalist added to line up
Talk:Biscuit Fire publication controversy

message: If anyone can think of a better name (without going overboard and composing a protologism), please feel free to do so.  There doesn't seem to be any name in the external media (popular or academic) to refer to the controversy, so I picked the most NPOV, bland, generic, and short name that I could think of.  (After all, if Wikipedia is to write about this, we have to call it something) --EngineerScotty 22:30, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Make Your Move (The Price Is Right)

message: How did it happen that someone got only two prizes? Does anyone know the values of the prizes from that game?
:The number string that day was 305030519.  The correct prices were $30, $519, and $3,050 (3050-30-519).  The contestant guessed $30, $519, and $5,030 (30-5030-519). 71.31.67.115 19:47, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

message: Messy Thinking Based on what I've watched about this game, the lights on the sequence display will go off in the event of a wrong answer.  I'd like this included in the explanation of the game.
:There's nothing to include.  The contestant's guesses haven't been lit up since the mid-'90s. I even went back and checked Thursday's rerun just to be certain. -TPIRFanSteve 04:16, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, it did.  The guesses used to light up as Bob read them off, and they'd shut off when the buzzer sounded if they were wrong.  Like I said, though, it hasn't been done for ten years or so. -TPIRFanSteve 02:39, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  And if he loses?
Talk:Desert Star Theater

message: Do future show listings belong here?  I'm thinking no, based on WP:NOT#Wikipedia_is_not_a_crystal_ball
:They're officially planned shows...it's not like the guy just made the shows up.... bob rulz 18:23, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:War of Ages

message: I removed merch links and tour dates, this isn't an advertisement, its an encyclopedia, if you want links to their merch use the link to their myspace where Im sure there are multiple options to spend money - Anonymous Coward  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.32.23.165 (talk) 06:00, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This article is written like an advertisement. Dear god, it's rather sickening, but I don't know a thing about this band, so I'm not really in the position to change it. 71.218.248.252 (talk) 10:33, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: It says not to add bands they have toured with (understandably), but don't add band's members have collaborated with? There are at least two guys that are or were in War of Ages that are in :Hope for the Dying, and the way I understand it, if multiple members of either band are in the opposite band, that qualifies as an associated act. Metalworker14 (Yo) 11:12, January 25, 2017 (UTC)
: The documentation is clear. I have pointed you to  or :template:Infobox musical artist (which is the same link) multiple times. Daniels and Hengle are supposedly in both bands. This is unsourced, but yes, they are are in both. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:21, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Associated Acts
Talk:One Away (The Price Is Right)

message: When is it ever asked, "Gentlemen, do I have at least one number right?"
:I'd like to know that too. --Jared 00:17, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, only on every single playing of One Away from its debut in late 1984 up through about March of 1995. 71.31.67.115 19:56, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:River Wey, Surrey

message: This information has been restored to the original River Wey article. The change was made without consultation and without consideration of the many existing links that were then sent to a disambig page instead of the target article. It is not recommended practice to have a disambig page with two entries - hat notes in the appropriate articles are sufficient. Motmit (talk) 23:04, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Ballaugh

message: I have created this stub and will fill in details soon. I intend to go through all those listed on my userpage and create reasonable sized articles about them. Also, I intend to create images such as that on top of the Michael (parish) article for each parish. -Localzuk (talk) 22:53, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Created this page
Talk:Parviz Dawoodi

message: The Vice President is Gholamreza Aghazadeh.  See http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060204/ap_on_re_mi_ea/nuclear_agency_iran;_ylt=AgsOxUU0sXU05lC_2W89rlms0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTA2Z2szazkxBHNlYwN0bQ--
--66.81.17.254 22:57, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There are 7 Vicepresidents of Iran, Dawoodi is the fires V-P. V1t 15:28, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
File talk:WikiMedal for Janitorial Services.png

message: I don't know why it didn't let me attach an edit summary but I reverted AzaToth's high-resolution version because it's too dependent upon fine detail; even at three times the size of the original, it's still hard to make out what it's supposed to be -- and at the same size as the original, it's just a featureless gold circle. -- Antaeus Feldspar 22:58, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, a very fine award... but should be a new award with larger details; not a replacement for one already in use. (it broke my talk page) - RoyBoy 800 08:48, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, made a new one now that I think scale better: →AzaToth 16:45, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
Category talk:Rail transport in New Zealand

message: I have set up the above todo list in order to help co-ordinate a working relationship between various team members that want to participate on expaning rail articles in this category. Please post any ideas you have below, thanks. Tom Webb 23:16, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ideas need/wanted for expanding this project 

message: I think this is a good idea. I could possibly make a template for people to stick on their userpages, similar to the "This user is a Firefox user", etc. Three main factors:
* Lack of photos for say a specific locomotive class, ie DC class
* The articles themselves (without putting people down) are written in New Zealand English, therefore do not conform with international quality standards. Im saying this, because our articles most probaly wont be included in the CD version of Wikipedia.
* Possibly adding photos to the Toll Rail section of their livery (colours).
These are just some ideas off the top of my head, so we can all work together and expand. I know, the user Xaiver (sm) is working with the articles as well. --Matt von Furrie 23:35, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good idea 

message: Should there be a new sub-category for articles specific to the Wellington region, as there currently is for Auckland articles?
-- Matthew25187 21:43, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I would fully support that.  We need to bring Wellington up to the same level of coverage as the Auckland area.  In fact, given the more successful history of commuter railways in Wellington, there is probably more that we can do in the way of coverage if we have good sources. - Axver 11:59, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wellington articles 

message: I propose to make Otaihunga railway station a redirect to Otaihanga railway station and have put it on the WikiProject NZR list of tasks. Current spelling and also the spelling in WMR advertisements and in Douglas Hoy’s 1972 book on the WMR (p52,120). I do not have access to Ken Cassell’s “Uncommon Carrier” at present. Hugo999 (talk) 04:03, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Otaihunga railway station article
Category talk:Rail transport in New Zealand/to do

message: *Tom Webb is working on the following:
:* Photographes of Rail Stations on Auckland Network
:: - Will have to find time to spend a day travelling railways to get good shots of rail stations up and down the length of network. Will possibly be able to do this towards the end of February this month.
:* Photo Requests
:: - Am happy to take some photographs that you may need for your articles in the Auckland region. Please list them below and will see what we can do as time allows. Adding them to the Picture Requests sub-section will allow anyone who can possible take that shot to do so then strike it off the list. 
===Picture Requests===
* Middlemore Train Station
* Papatoetoe Train Station N.B. Completed Tom Webb 00:10, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture Team

message: * Middlemore Train Station
* Papatoetoe Train Station N.B. Completed Tom Webb 00:10, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture Requests
Talk:Sand Land

message: There's no urgent need to produce an elongated one.  works just fine, and WP:HAT#"Not to be confused with"... agrees. Let's keep it short and to the point hmm? The pages Mayari and Mayarí, as well La Encantada and La Encantadora, do just that. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 14:00, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hatnote 

message: Viz Media appears to be using the title Sandland as one word instead of two on their website. So shouldn't that be used as the article's title? --Farix (Talk) 14:04, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This gives "SandLand" and "Sand Land", this just suggests "SandLand". Do you have a reliable source that says otherwise? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 17:10, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: here, here, and in Viz's own blog. --Farix (Talk) 18:02, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The sources at the official Viz site seem contradictory. Let me ask User:AnmaFinotera for her opinion. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 20:52, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The cover seems to imply SandLand. Anyone have a volume to look in to see what's use there? If not, I can try to run by my local Barnes and Noble to see if they have any volumes to check. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 21:00, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed. That sounds good ;) Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 21:04, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Last time I saw the Viz volume it said Sand Land, i'm pretty sure. – J U M P G U R U ■ask㋐㋜㋗■ 23:07, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

text: Searching Viz's site for Sandland gives no results. Searching for Sand Land brings you to the manga. Same thing happens at Amazon, Right Stuf, etc. Kyaa the Catlord (talk) 14:52, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

text: I've read it, but never bothered to check. Oh, wait, it was serialized in early issues of Shonen Jump... where it was called SandLand in the TOC and the copyright notice on its intro page ("SANDLAND © 2000 by BIRD STUDIO / SHUEISHA Inc."). Still, it wouldn't hurt to actually check the volume. 「ダイノガイ千？！」(Dinoguy1000) 19:32, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Sand Land'' or ''Sandland'' 

message: The redirect Beelzi has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Veverve (talk) 16:17, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Beelzi]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect Belzi has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Veverve (talk) 16:17, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Belzi]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Expression-oriented programming language

message: Is there a reason that Icon, Rebol and Curl are not mentioned ?
G. Robert Shiplett 18:10, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  expression-oriented and expression-based PL 

message: 1. This article does not cite any sources about the phrase "expression-oriented language", nor of the definition of this phrase given, nor even whether any of the examples given actually are expression-oriented languages.
2. The "criticism and prevention" section does not source independent criticism, nor any sources that are specifically criticizing expression-oriented languages, nor does it cite whether any of the mentioned languages are expression oriented. None of the existing sources 1 to 5 mention the subject of expression oriented languages. Source 1 is a programming style guide advising against the deliberate use of assignment expressions, while the criticism it's tagged inline to is about programming mistakes. Sources 2 to 4 are language reference material. Source 5 is an argument *for* the inclusion of assignment expressions in languages! But it's still unclear whether any of this can actually be attributed specifically to expression oriented languages.
3. The entire section of examples is unsourced, in addition to its existing problems of needing expansion.
I reccomend that the "criticism and prevention" section should me marked with the Synthesis tag until it has a reliable source that specifically mentions expression-oriented languages and makes a criticism of them or their features. Any sources that may only criticize one specific language should be reviewed as to whether they are relevant to just that language, or the wider topic that this article is about.
Additionally, the "examples" section should be marked with the Refimprove tag until all items listed are actually cited in reliable sources that actually name them as expression-oriented languages.
The entire article should also likely be marked with a Notability tag until the criticisms section is improved, or a reliably sourced section is added that provides better coverage of the subject beyond defining it and giving examples.
I'm not an experienced wikipedia editor, but I'll give it a shot to see if I can introduce these tags myself! 2601:405:8403:BBC0:B43E:4404:5D71:4CE (talk) 23:21, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article problems! 

message: This article mentions Algol 68 and expression oriented languages; can somebody access the PDF and determine if it's a good source to mark Algol 68 as an espression-oriented language? I'll keep looking for a publicly available source in the meantime.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0096055179900067 2601:405:8403:BBC0:B43E:4404:5D71:4CE (talk) 00:10, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Algol 68 Citation
Talk:Factory (object-oriented programming)

message: In the phrase "concrete type", the word 'concrete' has been wikified, but this links it to the page concrete, which is hardly appropriate.  It's not quite clear what article it should link to; the nearest I can come up with is Abstraction_(computer_science), which unfortunately doesn't mention the antonym 'concrete' until the 'Considerations' section.  For now, I've pointed it at the disambiguation page.  131.111.202.32 (talk) 11:44, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  'concrete' link 

message: Functions don't have attributes (at least in Python). So, f.obj is incorrect here.
def f():
    if f.obj is None:
        f.obj = A()
    return f.obj
PS: I don't know singleton pattern so can't edit the implementation.Antchal (talk) 09:06, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect code of function
Talk:Frame pointer

message: I suggest this framepointer redirect to the article on the stack frame, since it is discussed in its full context there.
:I agree. Since there was so little content in this article, I changed it to a redirect to Call stack, and I moved the external link (about 68000 call frames) to the other article. — Loadmaster 15:02, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have removed the WikiProject tag, as this article is either a redirect or deleted. If you oppose, please restore the tag. Thank you, fahadsadah (talk,contribs) 16:05, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikiproject Computing
Talk:Interface inheritance

message: So I am just a lowly high school student that just recently took the AP Computer Science AB exam, but I think this statement is funny:
"In Java, this is the mechanism used when multiple inheritance is desired. Since Java does not support multiple inheritance, the implementation of multiple interfaces allows it to satisfy the "is-a" relationship for multiple "super"classes." I believe classes in Java can implement more than one interface and you do not need to have a chain of inherited interfaces and ruin other stuff for a class to implement more than one. That would be silly. 24.13.39.188 (talk) 03:05, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled