lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Human (disambiguation)

message: It seems recently a user named Aris Katsaris moved all of the Human pages to new names. They originally had the form:
 Human (Star Wars)
for example, and now have the form:
 Humans in Star Wars
I don't know if this was an innocent action or not, but Wikipedia clearly uses the former convention. All disambiguations across the entire encyclopedia are made with the parenthesis. It is fine to change the names of the links from this disambig page, but it isn't fine to change the names of the articles to these longer and less encyclopedic names.
I've changed Humans in Warcraft back to Human (Warcraft) before realising the extent of the changes. Before I make any major changes back, I'd like to come to a consensus so as not to get caught into an edit war involving page names. —EatMyShortz
*OK - It's all been fixed now, thanks Uther. —EatMyShortz 14:38, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Humans in ..." vs "Human (context)" 

message: I would just like to add an extra note here (I'm sure I'll find some more time to add further in the future...) - where is the term 'humanity'?  I would have thought that this word is in common enough usage to warrant at least some mention under the human disambiguation page.  Perhaps a link to humanism - but humanism is a philosophy (and I suppose somebody could piece together a reasonable definition of 'humanity' from links that currently exist).  The point that I am trying to make isn't that humanity isn't already covered in some sense within existing wiki articles - but that the various definitions of it are too spread out (arguable 'humanity' deserves it's own dismbiguation page - for the several definitions of it : 
* the collection of humans (ie : all of them - but this is pretty much covered in the 'human' wiki)
* the concept - both in terms of civility and behaviour (actually - there are quite a few concepts in general verbal usage that come under humanity)
Here's a dictionary definition : 
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=humanity
**Official policy: Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Right now, Humanity links to the Human page - where under Terminology there is a brief definition of the term. For the other definition, Humanitarianism. I think the reason it isn't linked through the disambig is that disambig pages are only for those pages that genuinely have the same name or you might be confused - whereas, anyone looking for "Humanitarianism" would not try looking on "Human (disambiguation)". —EatMyShortz 14:38, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Humanity
Talk:Bret Hart

message: Can we change the front picture of Bret to something more flattering and youthful? 
Nobody wants to see old man Bret, its frankly sad. Bret is famous for his Wrestling and nothing else, so it only makes that the most looked picture on his page should be him in his wresting prime. 76.78.78.19 (talk) 17:08, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: ^ This is me, I just forgot to log in, Im gunna change it cause its been bothering me for a couple days now. Fsdefde (talk) 07:13, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change the picture? 

message: Please change the word "outwith" to "outside", which appears in the section titled "Professional wrestling career"--in the sixth paragraph under subheading "WWF Champion (1992–1996)". 
The article stipulates that it is to be written in Canadian English from the template at the top of the page () and at the top of this talk page. According to dictionary definitions, it is a chiefly Scottish English word. See Merriam Webster as an example. 2A00:23C6:86A2:2701:B087:1DDE:4B41:FCD (talk) 02:40, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Tollens (talk) 06:22, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 7 September 2023 

message: Bret hart a true legend of what is technically the sweet science of professional wrestling. 78.149.212.239 (talk) 01:54, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bret The Hitman Hart
Talk:San Jose Giants

message: I've continued editing on the temp page.Gateman1997 07:22, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Please provide verified proof that the team considers both light and dark gray team colors.Gateman1997 08:22, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Team colors

message: The beer batter is not a unique feature to san jose. Visalia and stockton also feature the beer batter
: - No, but the Beer Batter originated in San Jose and was adopted by other Cal league teams. (Saint0wen (talk) 00:12, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Beer Batter

message: This article says the team was "founded" in 1988; however, it appears that is really the year the team became affiliated with the Giants and adopted its current name.  The way minor league baseball works, a single franchise may change its major league affiliation from year to year and change its name, too, but it is still the same organization.  Perhaps this article should recognize that the current team is a continuation of the earlier San Jose minor league teams, not just the "latest" in a series of teams.  --Russ (talk) 13:54, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Previous teams
Talk:National Trades Union Congress

message: Has this been copied straight from the NTUC pages or what?  Historical background on how NTUC was emasculated by LKY & co and is now used to enforce that Singapore's unions are powerless is sorely needed... Jpatokal 07:25, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I think a lot of it has been dragged straight from the pages, sadly. It would be nice to discuss the political appointments that have toned down the militancy somewhat of the NTUC.. Cheers, Hauser 15:02, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: I cut quite a bit out of this page. Things like the role of the Branch Committee are pretty standard, and could be better fitted into a general article about the structure of trade unions. Other stuff, like "Indeed, tripartism between workers, the government and employers is the driving force behind Singapore's economic and social development." just had to go. I also added some history about the close relationship between the PAP and the NTUC.--Bookandcoffee 22:47, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: rework
Talk:Political sociology

message: Shouldn't Max Weber get a mention on this page?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.234.251.230 (talk) 03:49, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weber? 

message: Hello, I read the political Sociology page and I was a little confused as to why there was barely anything written on the article page itself. What I think would be very useful to add would be more background information, such as information regarding how political sociology really came about, and not just what it is and what it has to do with. Also I believe it would be helpful to speak on governments and how they really deal with different aspects on politics and sociology and how it all ties back together. Also I believe always adding possible controversies would be great as well, I believe that articles should have a controversy/critics aspect because it gives the readers a chance to see both sides of the spectrum and how some people disagreed and why, and what they tried to do about it specifically. So far that's really all I could think of, hope my ideas were clear and help. Luce Fonrose (talk) 17:21, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Political Sociology Proposals and Edits 

message: — Assignment last updated by SlyRedeemerJT (talk) 16:15, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: History of Socialism
Talk:Robert's letter to Sarah

message: What on earth is this?  I am very confused by the article, and its formatting makes it almost unreadable for me.  The contributor who created it seems to be a serious editor (judging from his userpage), so I hope he can clarify it for me here?  Right now it's so confusing for me that I almost listed it for VFD, but I am hoping I can understand why it's here before I decide to do that. Jwrosenzweig 07:33, 5 August 2005 (UTC)

message: Robert Emmet wrote this famous letter in September 1803 to his fiancee Sarah Curran.
Robert Emmet was one of the leaders of the Irish Rebellion in 1798 and this was the last letter he wrote. Sarah Curran is well known figure in Rathfranham and has a pub named after her, which could be considered as a high honour.
This letter explains his through feelings for her, since their relation was not approved of by her father.
Jorgenpfhartogs 14:59, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't doubt that it is a meaningful letter, but it has no place here.  Are you familiar with Wikisource?  That's the place for primary documents like the text of this letter.  We don't post primary source documents here (for example, the Declaration of Independence article doesn't include the text of the D of I).  This article is furthermore exceedingly confusing.  The letter should be moved to Wikisource, and anything important about the relationship of these two people should be in their articles.  Are you okay with that? Jwrosenzweig 22:01, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explanation 

message: The distinctive information about the letter has been added to Robert Emmet, and this article now redirects there. RJFJR 22:26, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merged and redirected
Talk:Robust

message: Links from articles dealing with behaviour of dynamic systems which need to reference sensitivity to changes in the plant, such as is dealt with under robust control theory, do not make any sense when directed to a computer science definition.  Robustness has a specific, rigorous definition in control, whilst in other fields it appears little more than a vague notion. Gordon Vigurs 08:45, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: H-infinity and all that
Portal talk:History

message: Malcolm X entry is repeated twice at positions 19 and 27. Saviourofthe (talk) 01:37, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Well spotted! Fixed. -- John of Reading (talk) 08:35, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Malcolm X is repeated twice on List of featured biographies 

message: It's a pity that there is so much italic confusion in the articles "Via Aemilia" and "Via Flaminia". The question is: should they be written in italics? Both articles are both italicised and not. Consistency in the same article is very important (remember, if you decide for italics or not, to do the same with all the other pages that use these terms, otherwise there is no point). JackkBrown (talk) 16:54, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: See MOS:FOREIGNITALIC: non-English words should be italicised using :template:Language (for screen readers). Except of course for loan words that have been assimilated. Thus , .  Except if you go to Rue du Faubourg Saint-Honoré, practically none of it complies. Sigh. --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 19:48, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  IMPORTANT
Talk:Law of conservation of matter

message: I realy believe that it should be a dinstict article from them conservation of mass --Lucinos 08:29, 5 August 2005 (UTC)

message: Changed subtitles, removed first person viewpoint and informal notations, rewrote introduction. Still needs expasion. Jerr 01:37, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This article needs serious work, but better yet, it should be merged/submerged into the Conservation of mass article.  (Actually, very little of this article needs to be merged into the Conservation of mass article because it already convers the subject reasonably well).  The vast majority of readers are interested in the commonly-understood Conservation-of-mass subject as applied to non-nuclear processes.  A brief internal link to a portion of an article on nuclear fission or fusion will suffice to remind the reader that these processes require a different way of thinking about the conservation of mass.  Thermbal 23:44, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Reworked
Talk:Paléo Festival

message: Yearly summary: Need confirmation for the compliteness of Village du Monde invited countries (specially Africa). Also, need help filling up the artist list and maybe a comment. http://www.paleo.ch/history/index.php for a complete history.
Should the years not be anti-chronological? It might be more logical... Nmacpherson 22:41, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

message: Under the year-by-year section of the list of artists, there is a link for each year 1997-2003 which says "for a complete list of artists for (this) year, see (link)", and every one of those links is broken.  Anybody watching this page know where to retrieve that info ?  If not, we should probably just get rid of those lines.
Also, at the end of that section, there is a reference that says:
 For the full list of performing artists, visit the official website. (link)
When I click that link, the message on the paleo website page says that I do not have permission to open that page.  That's not very good either.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bioevolution (talk • contribs) 19:02, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken / Unusable Links 
Talk:Weak acid

message: I guess this is a typo: "...and almost totally dissociate when dissolved in water and sea level magnitude." Is it supposed to be a reference to something like standard temperature and pressure? Moletrouser (talk) 12:25, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sea Level Magnitude? 

message: What would be the pH ranges of a weak acid or weak base --142.167.207.201 (talk) 18:13, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: pH ranges
Talk:Editing of anime in distribution

message: The article was recently nominated for deletion (and subsequently kept) due to it's poor state which has lead to the start of a cleanup of the article. While assessing the article for cleanup and how to move forward I began to have doubts over the article title. While edits to anime are typically associated with American distribution for TV networks, they are by no means the only edits to anime. In fact despite the regional focus in the title the article even discusses edits to japanese releases and the "fifteening" technique largely used by Manga UK. Even now edits to Japanese versions of broadcast anime are still in the news, Osomatsu-Kun being a current series undergoing domestic edits. It's also reasonably common that animation fixes are made before home releases in Japan or uncut versions released that weren't broadcast.
While a regional article would make sense if it was a subject limited to that region, we would be better served by an article without an implied regional bias in the title. However I don't currently have a suggested replacement title so suggestions are welcome.SephyTheThird (talk) 14:07, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that the title needs to be less regional. arwiki even calls their article "Changing anime content before it is distributed in the Arab world". Considering that these changes are usually made for broadcasting as opposed to home release on DVD, maybe "Editing of anime for broadcasting"? "Editing of anime" would be too broad because it could encompass the editing process in general. Or in line with the previous title "Editing of anime for distribution", which has he benefit of not precluding DVD edits. Opencooper (talk) 14:44, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Editing has occurred in direct to market releases as well, not just what makes it to broadcast television, example Angle Cop. A more appropriate title would be "Editing of anime in international distribution" or it could be simplify it to "Editing of anime in distribution". —Farix (t | c) 12:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: "international distribution" suggests it's a practice limited to outside japan when we know it isn't and I don't see a need to separate the two. "Distribution" works better for me.SephyTheThird (talk) 05:30, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: What about "Editing of anime in Japanese and worldwide distribution"? Will that sound better, or is it still sounding biased since it ain't limited to American localizations anymore? --75.136.131.188 (talk) 19:15, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title and focus
Talk:Sympathy for the Record Industry

message: The Hole section really doesn't need to be here. The release made was very insignificant compared to later releases (according to the Hole article). It merits a mention, but not the useless details added by Peanut. A list of current and past members would fill the article out nicely. Toveling 09:03, August 5, 2005 (UTC)
I think maybe the discography should have its own page..
ScarTissueBloodBlister (talk) 04:59, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Integral membrane protein

message: "Cells assemble IMPs in the endoplasmic reticulum. A short signal sequence at the N-terminus typically marks a protein as destined for installation in the membrane."
This is true only if the protein membrane insertion is processed during the protein translation. But there's a lot of protein where the membrane insertion mechanism is post-translational! Additionally, procaryotes have no endoplasmic reticulum but have membrane proteins!
: JFW | T@lk 01:29, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In addition to the fact, that integral membrane proteins are not generally cotranslationally inserted into the ER, i.e. membrane proteins in organells like mitochondira, chloroplast etc., membrane proteins are not generally ancored to the cytoskeleton. It might be true for many in the plasma membrane, but it is not at all a principal feature of membrane proteins.
The rest of the article is really good. It might be worth to mention beta-barrels, as structural feature of integral membrane molecule, and maybe also their function in bioenergetics, as all protein complexes of the oxidive phosphorylation chain in the mitochondria and in the photophosphorylation chain in the chloroplast consist of integral membrane proteins.
:Given that you obviously know about the subject, could you make edits as you see appropriate? You see, that is what being bold is all about. JFW | T@lk 00:29, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction 

message: I think we should simply refer here to two other main articles: Transmembrane proteins and Integral monotopic proteins. This second article should be created. Biophys 01:50, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, you are right.Biophys (talk) 22:36, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This had been changed back again. Could someone please add some more description of integral monotopic, so that the distinction to peripheral is clear? --Ettrig (talk) 18:16, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Further development

message: I have got one question: Is there any article which deals with the positive inside rule? Since it is one of the buzzwords in this context it might be senseful to add such a section in one of the membrane protein articles. What do you think?
(Sorry for mistakes, I was initially searching in the German Wiki, but positive inside seems to be missing there as well)
Leonard Fresenborg (talk) 09:06, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  positive inside rule 

message: I suggest to merge the 3 articles on Integral membrane protein, Membrane protein, and Transmembrane protein as they are dealing with almost the same thing. In fact, even if a "membrane protein" is not an "integral membrane protein" it would still make sense to treat these subjects under the same heading, especially to explain the difference. Peteruetz (talk) 03:30, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Membrane protein and Transmembrane protein 

message: — Assignment last updated by Ekrodge (talk) 22:35, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Cell Biology Honors
Talk:Attorney-General for India

message: The section on the page is not neutral. It only talks about Attorney Generals appointed by the UPA government and their politicisation and not those of the NDA/BJP government. 2406:B400:52:5ABE:7839:F492:52EA:7839 (talk) 02:26, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Politicisation of Attorney General
Talk:Order of the Indian Empire

message: According to this website( http://www.4dw.net/royalark/Korea/korea8.htm ) the Emperor of Korea was made GCIE in 1900. 
Why the British government decided to use this order? What, if any, was Kojong's connection with the Indian Empire? Mapple
Medals, etc, are still commonly given to foreign royalty and heads of state. The two Indian orders of chivalry created by the British had no Christian imagery or nomenclature: this probably made them more acceptable to Arab rulers and to the Emperor of Korea. NRPanikker (talk) 01:38, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Emperor of Korea, GCIE?
Talk:Josephine Butler College, Durham

message: I've never heard the new college called Howlands College, and Google shows no hits for the term.  Might this page more appropriately be at 'Sixteenth Durham college' or similar?  ("Sixteenth college" seems to be the way the university is referring to it, cf. http://www.dur.ac.uk/colleges/sixteenth_college/)  I'm just not sure that 'Howlands College' has any status at all, or even if it's the most commonly-used name informally, so it seems odd to use it.  TSP 09:53, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, with the benefit of hindsight, I think it was foolish of me to create the page under Howlands. TSP is right that this is the name the university uses for now, so it should be under 'The Sixteenth College' Robdurbar 12:31, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: The sections on the rugby club and football club don't seem very encyclopaedic in nature.  I think they should be cut down into the main text under a clubs and societies heading (or sports at JBC).  Thoughts?
Paulleake (talk) 19:28, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Concur entirely. Shimgray | talk | 19:14, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sports Clubs