lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Tannin (monster)

message: It is not mythology it is a faith-based belief system. Shalom you are loved 107.127.4.49 (talk) 17:02, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Offensive words 

message: Why does this article repeatedly say "Hebrew faith" instead of "Judaism"? What is the distinction?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by DENpdWik (talk • contribs) 22:07, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, the article must have been edited because that term doesn't appear anymore. That said, there's a potential distinction to be made between ancient Israelite religion (more similar to other Canaanite and ANE traditions) and Judaism practiced after the writing of the Bible, especially rabbinic Judaism. But I'm not sure that distinction is really relevant here. 70.172.194.25 (talk) 09:30, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Hebrew faith" 

message: "In Jewish faith, Tannin is sometimes conflated with the related sea monsters Leviathan and Rahab by Christians.[19]" Is it Jews or Christians that are conflating the creatures. The reference link goes to a "you can't see this page" for me. Rmhermen (talk) 15:08, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow, I came here to post the same thing. The wording is very confusing. 70.172.194.25 (talk) 09:23, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Confusing line
Talk:Cẩm Phả

message: *The Politics of Environment in Southeast Asia  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cheers! (talk • contribs) 02:35, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  environment sources 
Talk:Psalm 151

message: most of this page is plagiarized from the footnotes of the NET Bible (or vice versa?)
http://bible.org/netbible/index.htm?adp1.htm
24.141.12.194 (talk) 05:12, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled

message: A discussion of Psalm 151's use in the liturgy would be an improvement for this article. Rwflammang (talk) 22:22, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Liturgy

message: Psalm 151 is a Song by Boris Grebenshikov   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.200.224.67 (talk) 16:20, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Cultural influence

message: The article section "Dead Sea scrolls discovery" claims Psalm 151 was "part of the psalter used by the Qumran community". Psalter is a term used with fairly specific meaning in Christianity, especially in Eastern Orthodox tradition. Was that term also used by ancient Hebrews, and do the Dead Sea scrolls in fact identify it so specifically? Or do we just have a mistaken case of an editing summary using a familiar term? I've applied a citation needed. Evensteven (talk) 08:51, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Part of the "psalter"?
Talk:Cape Town Science Centre

message: This stub was created because I notice that there are many Wikipedia pages referring to science centres in Canada, Singapore and so on. And there are many Wikipedia pages referring to science museums in London UK and so on. But there is almost nothing about the equivalent organisations in Africa.
It's not a very good stub, I admit, but I've asked some people who know the field better than I do to submit some information. Christina Scott 06:38, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Prayer of Azariah and Song of the Three Holy Children

message: I've just deleted the full KJV text, which is an easy decision as the link to Wikisource is right there. The song lyrics are slightly different, but I'm thinking they still should be removed.--Akhenaten0 (talk) 15:24, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Full Text 
Talk:Svetozar Miletić (village)

message: Name in Croatian. Type Google search. Please don't vandalize the page. Kamarad Walter 06:51, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: User:IvanOS removed alternative Croatian name and I do not see valid reason for that. If current official name used in Croatian is Lemeš, Croats certainly used name Svetozar Miletić before name Lemeš was officially adopted and I see no reason why this other name cannot be mentioned. User:IvanOS also changed order of minority names and placed Croatian name before Hungarian one. I reverted this because I do not see any valid reason for such change - Hungarian ethnicity in this village is larger than Croatian one and therefore NPOV way of usage of alternative names should respect size of ethnic groups. PANONIAN 22:32, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Croatian name and names in lead section
Talk:You Need Love (Styx song)

message: "You Need Love" is an old blues song - I think it's originally by Willie Dixon.  This song has a lot of history that needs to be covered and a lot of covers that need to be mentioned.  The Styx version is just one in a sea of covers. P1h3r1e3d13 23:13, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Much older song
Talk:Ya Rayah

message: There should be something here about Dahmane El Harrachi. That Wikipedia article and Diwân say it was originally his song. Unfortunately El Harrachi's article is in French only... 75.135.82.119 05:05, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dahmane El Harrachi 

message: Amel's version is very electronic, has no African dance beats nor berbere sounds and in no manner is it closer to the original than any other cover.
I suggest dropping this line entirely.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.203.68.10 (talk) 21:10, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amel Bouchoucha 

message: "Up until the past 15 years this song was known to be Dahman El Harrachi's original song and in the Chaâbi/Andalous tradition of Algiers." - The sentence implies that some new revelation occurred 15 years ago that he wasn't the songwriter, yet doesn't give any reference to that revelation.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.226.192.202 (talk) 10:19, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unclear sentence 

message: came across this and wondering if it predates the Algierian versions? There's no dating in the video info 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8q7i8wRpHuI  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.203.144.19 (talk) 13:30, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Romani origin of tune?
Talk:Worried Man Blues

message: There's a 1927 song by John D. Fox and Sam Collins called "The Worried Man Blues" but it seems to be a completely different song. Here are the lyrics:
On a Sunday morning, just about half past four
My babe took my hand, said daddy I can't use you no more
Lord I may get better, babe I can't get well
Lord I may get better, babe I can't get well
I'm going back to my used-to-be, and baby it's country farewell
Lord I'm worried now, but I won't be worried long
Lord I'm worried now, but I won't be worried long
It takes a man like me, to carry this worried song
Baby I've been worried so long, that worrying don't bother me
Baby I've been worried so long, that worrying don't bother me
But ain't nobody here babe, to take pity on poor me
I've got a good girl, and I've got a lazy friend
I've got a good girl, and I've got a lazy friend
And if I tell about her, he always tell me where she been
I always will have trouble, until I'm dead and gone
I always will have trouble, until I'm dead and gone
If you will love me mama, you'd never treat me wrong
I'm not sure what the relationship between the two songs is, if anything. Kaldari (talk) 08:32, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  John D. Fox & Sam Collins song 

message: I think it is fair to say that Johnny Cash is closely associated with the Carter family, yet he has a completely different but still very notable Worried Man song. According to some concert patter, his song came from an encounter with a local at a Jamaican resort.  Other than the man being worried, there is not a whole lot of overlap, should there be a disambiguation page vis a vis what the man is worried about and who wrote the song?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.255.170.232 (talk) 21:42, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Johnny Cash song 

message: Whether or not one finds this idea convincing, it is not cited and and may lack support from published sources--on a quick search, I'm finding only casual opinions, not a sound musicological analysis. As it stands, it's pretty clearly original research as defined at https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original_research. It needs either good citation support or removal.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Poihths (talk • contribs) 13:55, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resemblance to "John Brown's Body" / "Battle Hymn of the Republic"
Talk:Abronah

message: Interesting that the name Abronah/Ebronah means, "passage" and contains the same consonants as the 'BR' forms we see in "Abram", "Abarim", "Ebron" (Hebron) "Eber"/"Ebre" (Heber--Hebre/Hebrews) "Habor"or "Khabor" etc. The West Semitic 'BR' represents a limited range of meanings and seems to convey an association with "passage", "crossing", "alliance", "convergence", "fugitive", "fleeting", or some "transitory" state. I think the term certainly describes the Hebrews and their wanderings into Egypt, out of Egypt, into exile in Babylon, out of Babylon, then into exile with the Persians, and Romans-- and now back again to their homeland etc. 
The early Habiri/Apiru people of the late Bronze Near east (covering a diverse range of territories and activities from c.2000-1100 BC) whether linked genetically to the Hebrews or not, contain the same root, 'BR' and are associated in the same or very similar life circumstance as the patriarchs and early Israelites such as Abram or David and their small armies of 300-600 men creating havoc on local towns.
I think this article should mention the root, "BR" and its relevance to the name "Abronah" as the crossing point, of the "BR"-- "Hebrews."
--75.175.79.88 (talk) 02:19, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abronah/Ebronah, Hebron, and the Hebrews.
Talk:World Outside Your Window

message: This morning (September 22 2020) I watched a video of Tanita Tikaram performing this song on You Tube. At the end of this video, Tanita Tikaram said that Helen Sharman had taken this song into space. Being in space is a great achievement, so does any one think this is worthy of a mention in the article? Vorbee (talk) 06:37, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Being in space
Talk:Dophkah

message: PaintedCarpet (talk) 17:13, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  copyedited 

message: Would be nice to be both in Hebrew: דָּפְקָה and in transliterated form: Dof-qah'  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anaccuratesource (talk • contribs) 02:28, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:   '''Dophkah'''
Talk:Wonderful Shadow

message: merge to Lovers in the City. I would support a merge with Lovers in the City. Vorbee (talk) 08:44, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

message: This single only peaked at Number 198 in the U.K. singles chart, so I am wondering whether it is notable enough for a standalone article. Does any one think a merge with Lovers in the City would be a viable option? Vorbee (talk) 18:53, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Potential merge
Talk:Hazeroth

message: Hazeroth Ha (definitive article) gzr (abundant)oth (feminine plural)(Hebrew: חֲצֵרוֹת‎) is a  "station")of the Exodus near Horab. It is referenced in Numbers, chapters 11, 12 and 33, as well as in Deuteronomy, chapter 1. According to Strongs Concordance "Hazeroth" means settlement. hazerim = village. 
At Hazeroth, Miriam was afflicted with tzaraath. (abundant skin eruptions) For more details, see Snow-white Miriam.
Hazeroth is about 8 miles northeast of Horab, the mountain of god and a suburb of Elat, Eloth, 
69.39.110.136 (talk) 23:43, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Massah

message: Jeremiah 23:33-38 should also be mentioned.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.135.201.51 (talk) 08:00, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jeremiah 

message: In a couple of days, if no-one objects, I'm going to redirect this article to Meribah (and then rename that article "Massah and Meribah"). Whether or not these are regarded as separate locations, there's so much overlap between the two that even the fullest possible versions of these articles would be more or less identical. Most Biblical encyclopedias combine the two (eg.   ). I'm proposing a redirect rather than a merge because there's nothing worth merging that isn't already present at the Meribah article. Dan from A.P. (talk) 19:31, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed redirect
Talk:Massah and Meribah

message: I don't know what this is doing in the article, but this is not what we do here.  It is itself WP:OR and is a call in mainspace for editors to conduct WP:OR, which is wrong on three levels.  
;References
* Psalm 95. References this incident, exhorting the Jews to trust and not turn away from God as at Meribah.
-- Jytdog (talk) 17:54, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved here from article
Talk:Wilbury Twist

message: Not sure where to add this in , or phrase it , so I'll leave that to the page creators discretion ...
The Instructions for "The Wilbury Twist" ( dance ) , are written by the man pictured on the front and back of the single sleeve , performing said dance. He is long time George Harrison chum , cronie , co-conspirator ; "Legs" Larry Smith ! He of the Bonzo Dog Band , subject of "His Name Is Legs ( Ladies & Gentlemen )" , and artist of the "Gone Troppo" album & ad campaign.
Harvey J Satan (talk) 00:15, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Dancer !
Talk:Zin Desert

message: The article as it stands makes the uncited claim that it is thus eminently possible that the "Wilderness of Sin" and the "Wilderness of Zin" are the same place. 
According to Numbers 33:11, the Wilderness of סִין with a samekh is right next to the Sea of Reeds. Whether or not you think that actually refers to the Red Sea is irrelevant, it's definitely closer to Egypt than it is to Israel, all the more so Jordan. And according to Numbers 33:36, the Wilderness of צִין with a tsadi is equivalent to Kadesh, generally considered to refer to Petra. There's twenty-five encampment spots and forty years between the two.
It's not "eminently possible" whatsoever that the Wildnerness of Sin is somehow equivalent to the Wilderness of Zin. Just because the Septuagint and the Vulgate don't distinguish the two doesn't mean the Hebrew text — the text it was written in — can't. Unless the Red Sea is bordering Petra now, there's no way these two deserts are equivalent.
Isaacmayer9 (talk) 23:16, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: "eminently possible?" No it isn't

message: Perhaps we should include a map of both the biblical Zin desert map and the modern Israel Zin desert map. I think that would be a beneficial addition.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.66.243.66 (talk) 14:36, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Map
Talk:Who Did You Think I Was

message: The similarities between the last section (beginning at 2:45) of the song and the section (beginning at 2:48) of the song "Power to Love" by Jimi Hendrix - Band of Gypsies should be noted. - Gwert.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.60.139.137 (talk) 01:30, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Hezekiah ben Manoah

message: ArmindenArminden (talk) 14:19, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pls. create redirect for "Hezekiah bar Manoah" 

message: Confusion all over the Web... ArmindenArminden (talk) 14:32, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was his ''name'' Hizkuni, or the ''title of his book''?
Talk:Whatever (Godsmack song)

message: the charts need to be looked at how can whatever chart 116 on the billbord hot 100 when it only goes to 100  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.17.143.75 (talk) 20:29, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  charts
Talk:With a strong hand and an outstretched arm

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :בְּיָ֣ד חֲ֭זָקָה וּבִזְר֣וֹעַ נְטוּיָ֑ה כִּ֖י לְעוֹלָ֣ם חַסְדּֽוֹ and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 14#בְּיָ֣ד חֲ֭זָקָה וּבִזְר֣וֹעַ נְטוּיָ֑ה כִּ֖י לְעוֹלָ֣ם חַסְדּֽוֹ until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  TartarTorte 17:12, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "בְּיָ֣ד חֲ֭זָקָה וּבִזְר֣וֹעַ נְטוּיָ֑ה כִּ֖י לְעוֹלָ֣ם חַסְדּֽוֹ" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The Hebrew text and the romanized transliteration do not match 2601:602:8280:3FA0:2D74:6CD3:1A46:8AC8 (talk) 17:05, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed it. Whoever think it's necessary and can provide correct romanization can of course add one. 93.182.179.179 (talk) 08:10, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hebrew / romanization incorrect
Talk:Biblical poetry

message: The section on rhyme is full of inaccurate statements.  I bet this whole article is horribly out-of-date by now, since it was taken from source text more than 100 years old.  Certainly in the rhyme section, it's full of editorializing about how Hebrew "might have" or "probably" had rhyme, based little more on the observation that language changes over time.  In point of fact, language change is *NOT* random, and it should be obvious whether rhyme was possible despite language change; and furthermore, we know pretty much exactly how to reconstruct Biblical Hebrew of various periods, so we should know for a fact whether or not there was rhyme.  I suspect no, despite what this article insinuates. Benwing (talk) 13:50, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rhyme? Blah 

message: I've re-rated this c-class, as there are non-encyclopedic and factual dispute tags in place, and several paragraphs with no refs. INeverCry  01:45, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Rating

message: I was disappointed in this section as it never answered the question: how much of the Biblical text (Jewish or Christian) is considered poetry? Rather, a rambling and inconclusive discussion that never got to the point that was promised. I realize this critique is harsh, but if one proposes a question, one ought to also propose a clear answer.emesselt (talk) 14:07, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Extent of Poetry

message: To elaborate on other comments here, the section on the extent of poetry in the OT and especially the prophets uses an unrealistic and over-exclusive definition of biblical poetry inconsistent with definitions proposed elsewhere in this article. Someone capable of imposing a contemporary overview is needed to overhaul the whole discussion.
24.212.206.187 (talk) 19:22, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definitions of poetry 

message: I think this whole article would be greatly improved if all the sentences that are mentioned (in their English translation) also provided the original Hebrew text, plus a transliteration JonathanHopeThisIsUnique (talk) 06:55, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original Hebrew text would be useful
Talk:Holden Gemini

message: please tell me who you are and why you keep deleting my page!!
: I'm not the one who's been doing it, but an article(Isuzu Gemini) describing this car already exists, and this page should be redirect to Isuzu Gemini. But thank you for contributing, and I would highly suggest you help expand Isuzu Gemini, thanks! Boccobrock 21:32, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know a heap about posting images, I've only ever uploaded pics I've taken myself - so they're free use. Wikipedia:Upload is probably the best for uploading pictures as it gives you the info you need, short and sweet.  Just click on the type of picture you have and it will tell you whether its okay for upload, and how to do it. Hope this helps. Tinkstar1985 10:27, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As for the Keep - Don't Merge bit, please discuss why at WP:CARS as this is where this issue have now been brought up, considering this has been the second time the merge tag has been removed without any edit summary to explain why. Willirennen (talk) 04:35, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm in favour of merging the two articles. Perhaps if the Holden Gemini was sufficiently different from the Isuzu Gemini, for example, like the Ford Laser was different from the Mazda Familia it was based on, but the changes were relatively minor. A lengthy Gemini in Australia paragraph on the Isuzu Gemini page could perhaps be most appropriate. Certainly the content lends itself towards expanding the 1974 section of Isuzu Gemini which is quite thin. It isn't going to hurt is not sufficient grounds. What is sufficient grounds is to explain how the car was different to the Isuzu, which has not really been done. The diesel engine might be the best defence as I do not believe that was offered in the Isuzu. The problem is unnecessary duplication of information. If wikipedia did not police issues of duplication of articles there would be the potential for a massive blow out in content. --Falcadore (talk) 06:22, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Carrot-tail viper gecko

message: I found there were two articles on the same species, Viper gecko and this one. There was a redirect given the name Teratolepsis fasciata to the former ,  and this name was also given in the taxobox. The two should be merged, then moved to whichever name is shown to be valid. cygnis insignis 14:59, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge and name
Talk:We Have Explosive

message: this is written like promotional material or a magazine review.  not good. i've edited it to sound more neutral. Spunkymcpunk (talk) 13:32, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks ΤΕΡΡΑΣΙΔΙΩΣ(Ταλκ) 20:45, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  style of writing
Talk:Cambridge Blue (colour)

message: Have it on an email from the secretary of CUBC. Need to get something a bit more official. Will probably be in the minutes of CUBC or something. --Mrh30 07:34, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Is Cambridge Blue chosen for being Caius Blue, and there being several Caius oarsmen in the Cambridge crew in the first Boat Race? 128.232.250.254 01:19, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Short answer, no that's an urban myth. --Mrh30 (talk) 21:54, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Caius Blue

message: Forgive me, but how is this a shade of blue in any sense of the word?Cromulant (talk) 06:11, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not red, orange, yellow, white, black or purple. Nor is it definitely green. OrangeDog (τ • ε) 15:36, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

text: It is now green. Such institutions love a throwback, a remnant, a linguistic relic. It would do well however to chart it under green, it would stand out I would say just as much (or more), but verbally not visually.- Adam37 Talk 10:28, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Not blue

message: Can someone add a link from the words "Oxford blue" to that article?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.122.234.57 (talk) 02:40, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikilink Oxford blue

message: “This colour is actually a medium tone of spring blue.[citation needed] Spring green colours are colours with an h code (hue code) of between 135 and 165; this colour has an h code of 140, putting it within the range of spring green colours on the RGB colour wheel.”
What’s all this, then? 2601:647:5800:7D80:D8F2:48AF:25E9:E5D5 (talk)  — Preceding undated comment added 04:57, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: This patently did not need a citation, it was a trite explanation of green in the RGB wheel, which clearly pays a good part over to 'blue'.  Hence "B". However incoherent is a word thrown about by ignorant people who do not want to even seek at getting the natural, obvious meaning out of something. I have without even viewing your critique – I hope you share my result – got rid of "citation needed" which is as subserviant to "tweedle dee, tweedle dum" if you have ever read a law text – i.e. I say what a thing is and you just go along with it no matter how absurd, as I have ever seen.- Adam37 Talk 10:33, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Incoherent