Talk:Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

message: As Metroopensdoors.com shows a short introduction and then redirects to WMATA.com, I feel it is redundant to have both links on the Wikipedia page. Schuminweb 04:29, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Web Links

message: I have trimmed and copyedited the "names" section in the article to make it more concise, and removed the part that talks about why the "metropolitan" in WMATA.
The reason for the term "Metropolitan" instead of "city" in the names of many Washington, D.C. organizations (such as the Washington D.C. police, the Metropolitan Police Department, or MPD) is that Washington, D.C. is technically not a city, for obvious political reasons. 
I'm not entirely sure the reason given below for "metropolitan" in WMATA. I actually think it has more to do with how WMATA funding is spread across the regional jurisdictions, and that for political reasons "washington metropolitan" was preferred over "national". I don't have a citation for this off the top of my head, but can look for one. -Aude (talk | contribs) 19:26, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Names

message: The Purple Line is not intended to go around the beltway-it will actually cut very close to the border of DC at parts (just after Silver Spring it will be less than a mile from the border), and will connect (as directly as possible) Bethesda > Silver Spring > New Carrolton, which will keep it many miles from the beltway. That, and the Purple Line isn't even being discussed as an actual Metro extension (they're leaning towards BRT, but the best we'd get is Light Rail). Does anyone object to these changes? -Rmeskill 18:06, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Purple Line

message: :File:WMATA Metro Logo.svg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 01:31, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for File:WMATA Metro Logo.svg

message: Can somebody please explain the leaseback scheme in more detail? (Also, today the judge will be issuing a ruling.)
69.140.152.55 (talk) 15:58, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Metro and Belgian bank, KBC Group, reached a settlement on November 15, 2009 to end a long-term leasing deal after nearly three days of talks in federal court.
The agreement benefits the riders of our system and taxpayers of this region,” said Metro General Manager John Catoe outside of U.S. District Court. “Metro no longer faces the immediate threat of cuts to our capital budget and a downgrading of our credit rating.”
All parties agreed not to discuss the terms of the settlement.
KBC Group was seeking an immediate $43 million payment from Metro after the credit rating of insurer, American Insurance Group, was recently downgraded. The downgrade put the deal in a technical default and allowed the bank to seek payment because AIG had guaranteed the agreement between KBC and Metro.
Metro had asked a federal judge to temporarily bar the bank from collecting payment. The judge urged a compromise after hearing arguments at a Wednesday court hearing.
“It sends a strong message to other banks that they cannot make a financial windfall at the expense of transit riders,” Catoe said.
The case was being closely watched by financial institutions and other transit agencies that have received similar demands from other banks.
Metro has 14 similar lease agreements with financial institutions. Several banks have threatened to put the agency into default under the agreements unless Metro finds additional high-rated insurance coverage of the deals now that AIG’s credit rating has been downgraded. Metro and a group of 30 other transit agencies have asked the Treasury Department or Federal Reserve to back the insurers’ guarantees of the deals.
“We’re asking the federal government to guarantee the insurer’s credit rating,” Catoe said. “This would be at little to no cost to the federal government, and the transit agencies would no longer be in technical default of the contracts.”
The chief executives of several major transit agencies will join Metro on Capitol Hill Tuesday urging Congress to legislate a provision in the economic stimulus bill to require the Treasury Department to back AIG and other insurers’ credit ratings.
72ChevyNova (talk) 15:58, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Impacts of the 2008 financial crisis

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100113082838/http://wmata.com/about_metro/docs/metrofacts.pdf to http://www.wmata.com/about_metro/docs/metrofacts.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:10, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080227001651/http://www.dullesmetro.com/pdfs/Dulles-Fact-Sheet.pdf to http://www.dullesmetro.com/pdfs/Dulles-Fact-Sheet.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:54, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The NTSB report on the June 2009 Washington Metro train collision mentions a lack of a “safety culture” at Metro.  This is often summarized in the media as a lack of prioritization of safety concerns at the agency;  however, I think that is incorrect.  Although the actual report does not say this in so many words, what I think it is referring to is an overemphasis on punitive discipline as the primary means to enforce safety and an underemphasis on system engineering improvement – but I have no sources for my interpretation.  Any input? 97.34.217.59 (talk) 13:40, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  &#8220;Controversy&#8221; section 

message: I can’t find a source confirming that WMATA is involved in the development or operation of the DC Circulator. (This question came up in a work context for me.) Can anyone else? Richmintz (talk) 15:11, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Involvement in DC Circulator