lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Abbeville

message: An automated Wikipedia link suggester has some possible wiki link suggestions for the Abbeville article, and they have been placed on this page for your convenience.Tip: Some people find it helpful if these suggestions are shown on this talk page, rather than on another page. To do this, just add  to this page. — LinkBot 00:59, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiLink suggestions

message: :On 12th September 1939 in Abbeville took place a conference in which France and Great Britain decided not to help Poland in its fight against Germany.
Considering that the UK had already declared war by then, surely the UK had already decided to help Poland? It's unrefereced, so I will tag it as such. Mjroots (talk) 16:02, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: declaring war is not the same as helping. According to the agreement with Poland GB and France were supposed to move into Germany from the west when most of German forces were tied in the east which would end the war before xmas. They didn't and it was the Abbeville conference when they officially decided to keep doing nothing until Germany finishes Poland, reinforces and moves west. Errarel (talk) 15:08, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: This doesn't sound right

message: 20th May 1940 was also the day of the Abbeville Massacre, a wanton shooting exercise by French soldiers of random foreigners who had been rounded up in a cellar. Victims included a Canadian ice hockey coach and the chairman of a pro-Flemish party. I find it somewhat odd that nothing about that is mentioned here.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.31.22.99 (talk) 22:16, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  That's indeed odd, in fact the Abbeville Massacre should have its own article! --41.151.106.198 (talk) 21:28, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abbeville Massacre 

message: I did a small amount of cleanup of matter that seemed to be over-literally translated from French; there is more to do, and I do not understand every detail. —Tamfang (talk) 22:28, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  translation
Talk:Berri–UQAM station

message: Would it be appropriate to mention the problem this station (and the surrounding area) has with, erm, illegitimate small businesses? :) —No-One Jones 01:01, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: HA! Well put! I was wondering the same thing. By all accounts it IS a thriving business, albeit illegitimate. Morphine 17:22, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Mention drug dealers?

message: Can I call list and found 204.48.76.136 (talk) 15:12, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lost and found
Talk:Music of Montana

message: The entry is extremly POV. I would revise the whole paragraph so that it is 1)not so opinionated and 2)comes from an individual point-of-view. If you want, I can assist. Rsm99833 22:03, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Go ahead and clean it up if you like.  It's certainly no more POV than the rest of the article. I've removed a few of the most objectionable bits. Tuf-Kat 22:33, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Ska in Montana

message: Please, editors who are active on this page, there is an immense void of citations to support this article. I will try and clean things up as I can, but if there are others watching this page, it would be helpful to get more citations for this article, or delete unsupported claims.Dakotacoda (talk) 20:18, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations needed throughout
Talk:Amber Diceless Roleplaying Game

message: An automated Wikipedia link suggester has some possible wiki link suggestions for the Amber_Diceless_Roleplaying_Game article, and they have been placed on this page for your convenience.Tip: Some people find it helpful if these suggestions are shown on this talk page, rather than on another page. To do this, just add  to this page. — LinkBot 01:03, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Suggest removing the link to Dogs in the Vineyard in the Conflict section.  ADRP conflict resolution is really not much like DITV conflict resolution.
Vaxalon 16:03, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict Resolution section 

message: System descriptions are interrupted mid-way through to insert analysis bits about Psyche in Amber DRPG compared to the Chronicles. Can game design analysis have it's own section separate from explaining the system? Can all attributes be compared to the books in addition to Psyche? This is certainly an area discussed elsewhere on the web (perhaps the best being http://wso.williams.edu/~msulliva/campaigns/amber/tips/). Arref 23:49, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I wouldn't say that a sub-section looking at one of the attributes was an interruption to the attributes section; and I don't think that analysis of the system should be separated from explanation of it; what would be left would be against the no game guides guideline.  However, analysis of the other powers would be appropriate (though I doubt there's as much to say about them) and the site you point out does seem to provide some useful references (for example, on the Corwin Cycle vs. Merlin Cycle canon issues). Percy Snoodle 11:37, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK. Added tips for setting up and play of game. Linked to analysis of all attributes. Arref • contribs 17:48, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  System topics 

message: *White Wolf #31 (May/June, 1992)
*Shadis #10 (Dec., 1993)
*Casus Belli #67https://archive.org/details/casus-belli-067/page/n21/mode/2up
* Casus Belli #70 (July 1992)
BOZ (talk) 17:22, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reviews
Talk:Gurn

message: What about these? // Liftarn (talk) 13:02, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better pictures 

message: I marked the article for cleanup and removed most of the section on MDMA. I agree that I have never heard of the term "gurning for the DJ", nor have I heard of an MDMA high being referred to as "gurning", nor individual MDMA tablets referred to as "gurns". I also surely hope that I never have to hear someone say anything along the lines of "gurning my tits off"... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.224.44.92 (talk • contribs) 03:18, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: gurn.net looks like it has nothing to do with making faces, and should not be linked. --66.93.0.68 16:12, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: MDMA could still be mentioned here, as the "gurning" associated with it is apparently not identical to bruxism, and this article is not just about gurning contests. Peter E. James (talk) 22:38, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Gurning (in regards to MDMA) is the weird looking jaw movement, including opening and closing of the mouth, used to stretch the jaw muscles, which get tight from clenching. The term is used at least some, although I hadn't heard it until a friend mentioned it to me. We usually just call it retard face. 0127hrs, 3 September 2012  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.101.101.22 (talk) 15:58, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: Duck Face redirects here and i do not believe it should. 
Δρ∈rs∈ghiη (talk) 21:43, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duck Face 

message: since making a face, and duck face, redirect here, there needs to be mention of these terms in article, esp. of their origin status, ie are they yank or brit english. oy, i added info on the yank version. hope its both swell and bloody useful, mates.50.193.19.66 (talk) 17:27, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirects and colloquialisms

message: In Canada, gurning is when someone with no teeth does this, even getting their bottom lip over their nose. Here's what I suggest:
*Make that bit about toothless gurning into a section.
*Get an image of this sort of gurning into that section.
Okay, who reading this has no teeth and is not camera shy? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 08:01, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gurning as I know it
Talk:Modprobe

message: I was thinking that making a guide for how to use Modprobe on Wikipedia, is not really needed, and would rather belong on WikiMedia (or one of it's daughter sites) - Let me know on my talk page, I am quite sure that guides really do not belong Wikipedia. 80.199.155.134 (talk) 16:39, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guide does not belong here? 

message: Neither this article nor any other resource seems to accurately describe modprobe.
What does the List command do?  Does it list the modules that ARE installed, or the modules the COULD be installed?  And whichever one it does, how does one do the other thing?
:  # modprobe -l ee* 
typically lists eeprom.ko.  But it is not yet installed!  If you look in /sys/bus/i2c/drivers, eeprom is not there.
Now do 
:  # modprobe eeprom 
Now look again in /sys/bus/i2c/drivers, and see eeprom is there, containing 0-0050 etc, so you can access RAM SPD data.
But if you do 
:  # modeprobe -l ee* 
again, it will list eeprom.ko exactly the same as before, no changes shown.
-71.174.178.179 (talk) 16:15, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  list confusion 
Talk:Mongrel (The Bob Seger System album)

message: Capitol Records did indeed release this album on CD; I have it!  Clean & clear, excellence all the way.  Ditto their CD release of Rambling Gambling Man album.  Only "Noah" is missing on CD, so I'll have to make due with the LP.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.182.46.170 (talk) 17:49, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
Talk:Mount Banahaw

message: ?? 49.146.142.50 (talk) 10:15, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is mount banahoa shield,composer or cinder 

message: The Last Eruption Of Mount Banahaw? 223.25.25.108 (talk) 03:11, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  A.P
Talk:Carrollton bus collision

message: That's a statement about the memorial sign, but the article doesn't say what's so controversial about it. The source for that claim merely says that some residents wanted the sign to be taken down, but it doesn't say why. I don't think that "controversial" or "controversy" are good words to reflect the statement from the source. Some residents not being happy with a sign seems to be too "harmless" to be called a "controversy". There may be other sources that go into detail about the reasons for wanting the sign to be taken down. Maybe those other sources would indeed show something worth being called a controversy, but the current source doesn't seem to support such a strong word. Nakonana (talk) 17:15, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the statement. A claim like that needs more than a passing mention of a disagreement from a single source. Stefen Towers among the rest! Gab • Gruntwerk 17:54, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "There has been some controversy over the signs."
Talk:Cocktail shaker sort

message: This algorithm can be refined by recording the last swap in each pass.  For each step where you don't swap; if you have not swapped yet then move the start limit up, and if you're at the end limit then set that limit to your last swap and end that pass.  Stop when the limits meet, or start the next pass at the new limit.  This is helpful when only a limited area of the array has been de-sorted.  In some applications you'll be able to pre-load the limits with helpful values.
: It also speeds the algorithm up quite a bit on data that's already almost sorted.  About eight years ago, I implemented the cocktail sort algorithm before I'd heard it given a name.  My program was a simple flat database app.  To delete a record it would move a record from the end to fill its place.  When the user adds, deletes and changes some records and then issues the sort command, the cocktail sort would simply and efficiently move the added records down into place, the records moved to replace deleted ones back up to the end, and the modified records in whatever direction they need to go. -- Smjg 12:26, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: sort
Talk:Canoe freestyle

message: Isn't this also called Rodeo kayaking? Alex Krupp 04:05, Dec 18, 2004 (UTC)
Yes, I thought it was much less often used now (relegated to paragraph 7) but a few searches seem to show it is still widely used (presumably in America, cos not many paddlers in the uk call it rodeo anymore). Now fixed.
Tebbb 00:58, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What about adding the history of the sport?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wavesport1 (talk • contribs) 04:40, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: The moves section could be re-organized; playboating moves can be grouped into:
#Flatwater tricks
#Downriver tricks
#Wave tricks
#Hole tricks
There are also several common tricks that have been left out. I plan to revamp this section with such an edit, but wanted to first comment on this idea here. Seek writ awe there (talk) 02:30, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Moves

message: As mentioned right above, some moves/tricks are still missing, among them basic things like bow/stern stalls. As I'm not sure where to put it in the current system, I'm just mentioning it... and mentioning that there's also a picture on Commons now (in fact: two, but the other one is even worse :o))... so please go ahead and add the picture as well when you add the bow stall. Thanks, Ibn Battuta (talk) 10:53, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Bow stall" is missing 

message: Hi,
For your information, I've just uploaded on Commons ~120 new pictures of playboating that I've taken during the freestyle kayaking european cup. I'm not sure of the names of the tricks performed, that's why I will not add them myself, but take a look at this category if you want to update or add some photos to tricks: Category:Playboating at the Natural Games. See the galery bellow for a quick overview:
2017-07 Natural Games Playboating 047.jpg
2017-07 Natural Games Playboating 079.jpg
2017-07 Natural Games Playboating 060.jpg
2017-07 Natural Games Playboating 090.jpg
2017-07 Natural Games Playboating 114.jpg
2017-07 Natural Games Playboating 26.jpg
2017-07 Natural Games Playboating 22.jpg
2017-07 Natural Games Playboating 103.jpg
2017-07 Natural Games Playboating 01.jpg
2017-07 Natural Games Playboating 099.jpg
2017-07 Natural Games Playboating 20.jpg
— 0x010C ~discuter~ 20:52, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  New available pictures 

message: This article needs a section on competition points systems IMHO. 173.30.68.254 (talk) 21:10, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scoring
Talk:Night Moves (album)

message: Didn't Frankie Miller write Fire Down Below?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:446:4201:86F0:2DC4:4BB4:BEDB:8E1A (talk) 22:05, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Frankie Miller 

message: Very confusing, had to read it a couple of times where it says "his first with the Silver Bullet Band"...I take that to mean first studio album? Because "Live Bullet" has Silver Bullet Band on the cover. Then there's "Beautiful Loser" which, if you read that wiki page, says Silver Bullet was used as well. Recommend deleting "his first with the Silver Bullet Band"?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by FiggazWithAttitude (talk • contribs) 19:29, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: 13 months with no reply so I cleaned up the sentence in question. FiggazWithAttitude (talk) 20:22, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Silver Bullet Band
Talk:Stranger in Town (album)

message: Actually Brandye was not the group that sung backup on Old Time Rock and Roll. They sang backup on Track 2, with Clydie King, Venetta Fields, and Sherlie Matthews, and track 8. Clydie, Venetta, and Sherlie sung backup on Track 2 and 7. TheGreatestLuvofAll ( chat with me ) 07:26, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Talk:Against the Wind (album)

message: I'm amazed there's nothing on here about how "Her Strut" is a song specifically written about Jane Fonda. When this album came out he said in a radio interview that he wrote it when thinking about how the people she goes up against are confronted not just by her personality but also by her body (this was when she had introduced her workout tapes). The lyric for the song as printed on the album sleeve had the famous part written as: "But oh they love to watch her strut / Oh they do respect her / But they love to watch her strut. " But Seger sings it as, "Oh they do respect her but [butt] / They love to watch her strut." Seger said that people (meaning men) would find her an interesting person because of her political convictions, but at the same time they didn't want to miss watching her walk away. Can't somebody do a quick internet search to add this to the article? __209.179.29.71 (talk) 04:31, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nothing here about Jan Fonda and "Her Strut"? 

message: There was some confusion over the Grammy award with both the album and song articles indicating a Grammy award. In researching the subject I mistakenly thought it was the song that was nominated rather than the album. Actually the song was nominated in the Pop category and the album in the Rock category. The source cited reads as follows:
:Best Pop Vocal Performance by a Duo or Group with Vocal
:"Against the Wind," Bob Seger & the Silver Bullet Band (track from "Against the Wind")
:Best Rock Vocal Performance by a Duo or Group with Vocal
:"Against the Wind," Bob Seger & the Silver Bullet Band (album)
Hopefully this clears up any confusion. Piriczki (talk) 14:30, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammy award
Talk:The Distance (Bob Seger album)

message: I see some debate as to whether he belongs in the "Silver Bullet Band" or "Additional musicians" subsection of "Personnel". The article already cites Rolling Stone magazine, and the source describes the "nucleus" of the "Silver Bullet Band" as bassist Chris Campbell, keyboardist Craig Frost and saxophonist Alto Reed, and the only songs the liner notes credit Abbott as having played on are "Makin' Thunderbirds" and "Shame on the Moon". Having played on just two songs on the whole album certainly make him an official and member. Having said that, I'm gonna go ahead and move Abbot from the "Silver Bullet Band" subsection to the "additional musicians" subsection, moving him back to where he'd been before this debate began. 2601:153:881:3D60:C5E7:8434:4EA7:5E6 (talk) 12:47, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Drew Abbott]]'s status as a Silver Bullet Band member on this album
Talk:Government ownership

message: *"Within the public sector, "public services" such as healthcare, education, police, fire service, financial services are sometimes distinguished from "public goods" like coal, and steel." - Jerryseinfeld 04:57, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Nonsense removal

message: *The content from "public ownership" was move here since it belongs here. The arguments against "public" ownership is that it isn't really "public" ownership. Which is shown by the fact governmet bonds are not "public bonds" because the "public" doesn't own or run the government. - Jerryseinfeld 05:53, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: This article is about government owned businesses ("public business"). "public business" used in this way? Really?? In any case, Jerryseinfeld, you seem determined to write an article about how terrible it is for government to own businesses operating in competitive sectors. (You might like to look at Vattenfall.) Fine, do that - you can have "government ownership" as your US-centric sandbox to play in. I will move the "Public ownership" material to public sector and focus on the broader issues. (I have already corrected your absurd redirect of public services to public goods; thanks for spurring me to at least making a start on that article.) Rd232 16:53, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Public services and public good should be merged. - Jerryseinfeld 17:24, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you trying to have an edit war? Look at public services and public good and see the difference!! If you're not familiar with public services, fine, maybe it's not a term used in the US. But previous things you said suggest an ignorance of what a public goood is too, which I can find no excuse for. Go to your local library and pick up any introductory economics textbook if you don't believe the Wikipedia definition. You're heading in my estimation from US-centric to uneducated in economics to troll. Please stop this downward slide by showing reasonableness (maybe even knowledge, if that's not too much to ask). Rd232 19:18, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move
Talk:Like a Rock

message: First off, the URL doesn't seem to be working. More importantly, I see that the cited source for the recording date(s)/recording studio(s) is Discogs, which I believe is an unreliable source, per WP:NOTRSMUSIC because its content is user generated. Having said that, I'm gonna go ahead and tag this as an unreliable source.--2601:153:881:3D60:7827:667F:2DA6:A923 (talk) 00:42, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source for recording dates and studios
Talk:Carly Janiga

message: Isn't this a vanity article? I don't think many people have heard of this girl, the article is short, not very interesting and not really linked to.--211.29.198.148 05:33, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: agreeing. she was on the US national team but never did an Olympics or a Worlds, and I notice they're frequently pulling vanity adds out of the article. If there's interest I'll put it up as an AfD, or someone else can. Mademoiselle Sabina 15:11, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:James Mooney

message: Is this article supposed to reference two different people? Should we disambiguate? Rhymeswithgod 05:58, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, and here is a third . Sam Spade 15:05, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Which James money?

message: The following was in the body of the article and didn't seem relevant for his biography, so dropping it here for a future editor.
Mooney's obituary is available on JSTOR in American Anthropologist 24, #2 (New Series), pp. 209–214. A fuller biographical profile by George Ellison can be found in his edited version of James Mooney's History, Myths, and Sacred Formulas of the Cherokees."''
Signed, --Engineerchange (talk) 13:07, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moving some extra text here
Talk:Otakorp

message: from VfD:
After fourteen months, the only encyclopedic content of this long article is: "Otakorp Inc. is a non-profit organization based in Pennsylvania that manages the popular Otakon anime convention." The rest, which is considerable, is an address list. Now, I've no objection to that single sentence, but if it's all that's worth saying about Otakorp Inc then it can be said within Otakon. I think I'd be within my rights in merging and redirecting, but my idea of a merge would involve deleting the huge majority of this article, and it would be discourteous (or worse) for me to do this unilaterally. Thus my invitation to a VfD of the (to my mind) non-encyclopedic ninety-plus-percent of the article. -- Hoary 06:00, 2004 Dec 18 (UTC)
*Agreed. The sentence, and perhaps the president of Otakorp, should be merged into Otakon, and a redirect made. Meelar (talk) 06:04, Dec 18, 2004 (UTC)
*Delete.  It takes that many people to run an anime con? Gamaliel 06:09, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: *Never mind...everything in that sentence is already at Otakon. But we should just eschew the whole list of people and e-mail addresses and turn this into a redirect. Ливай | ☺ 06:34, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Friockheim

message: This is a lot of stuff for a tiny little village (which I have been through many times).
----
Horrible - very bad style - should have a lot of the 'chatty language' removed - magic parallelogram indeed! So that was that! - I might have a go at starightening this out - and reducing it somewhat - It is a lot for a small place - but it does warrant mention becasue of the unusual name. There's no mention of the crematorium either - a rtaher major modern change I'd have thought Alimat 03:49, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added unreferenced and inappropriate tone tags.-h i s   s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 23:56, 14 May 2007 (UTC)