lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ralpacan

message: If the dates are correct, it means that Ralpacan lead his first raid at the age of 10, and then captured a town on the east coast of China at the age of 13? This doesn't seem right. It seems like he would be too young at the time, and Shandong is on the east coast, across from Korea, and is not contiguous with any part of Tibet.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.248.34.173 (talk) 23:27, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, you seem to have misunderstood what I wrote, it was the Tibetan general Tsen Zhang 'Bro sTag who led those raids into China, not the Tibetan Emperor himself. I have tried to make the passage clearer. As to the reference to Shandong - that was a mistake. The town named Yanzhou during the Tang Dynasty was apparently in a different location to modern Yanzhou, which is in Shandong Province. I have just found in Beckwith's book, pp. 150-151, 166 that this Yanzhou was located "in the southern Ordos just north of the Great Wall. They first occupied in in 786 and are reported attacking Chingsai Fort - apparently near Yanzhou.  I will try to adjust the article now. Thanks for commenting, John Hill 08:38, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extremely young leader? 

message: This king (actually a 'tsen po' which means 'chief', not 'king') is widely referred to in scholarly accounts as Ra pal chen, with 'chen' translating as 'great' in the Tibetan language. The title of this page is most incorrect, and should be edited to correct the error. 93.23.250.194 (talk) 20:25, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Why do you believe that it should be Ra pal can rather than Ral pa can as it is listed in BUDA? 66.244.82.92 (talk) 13:41, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with the earlier comment. In historic documents and in current scholarly explanations and works, the suffix is CHEN (not CAN) which means big, or great, in the Tibetan language. His name should correspond to the Tibetan language since he was a Tibetan King. 103.146.218.84 (talk) 07:17, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rapalchen (not Ralpacan)
Talk:Demographics of Bratislava

message: According to the 1991 & 2001 census seen on the statistics.sk website, 10% of Bratislavians moved from no denomination to the Roman Catholic Church between 1991 and 2001. Could the reason for the large increase be mentioned in the article? --maclean 01:48, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Religion between 1991 & 2001

message: Isn't it about time to update the 20 year-old stats? https://www.scitanie.sk/en/population/basic-results/number-of-population/SR/SK0/SR
--188.167.56.2 (talk) 23:52, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to update it yourself if you are up to the task! Tweedle (talk) 14:50, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update?
Talk:Baptist beliefs

message: An editor has deleted a picture with a vague reference to policy.  He or she should bring it here first.  The picture directly illustrates what the text of the article says, and therefore improves the article.  If the editor feels that text in the article is unverified, he should place a citation needed tag, where appropriate. Alanscottwalker (talk) 15:57, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  picture
Talk:Duathlon

message: The "winter duathlon" is a different sport, it should not be in this article, it should be in a separate article. The section says it originates from winter triathlon, so a different sport from triathlon where the duathlon originates. -- 76.65.131.160 (talk) 13:00, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Winter duathlon

message: Why does Off-road duathlon have to be a discrete article from Duathlon? Newmonkeycrew (talk) 03:11, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Merged. BarkeepChat 14:36, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Off-road duathlon with the Duathlon page?
Wikipedia talk:WikipediaWeekly/Episode31

message: Those language icons have been around since mid 2005, and were standardized (and fairly common) in early 2006 ;) --Quiddity 02:10, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Language icons

message: This story was slashdotted on August 31 ;) --Quiddity 02:28, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The older coloring/trust metric was possibly http://researchweb.watson.ibm.com/visual/projects/chromogram.html ? (via this slashdot story, which also links http://www.abeautifulwww.com/2007/05/20/visualizing-the-power-struggle-in-wikipedia/ which might be what wikirage was inspired by?]) --Quiddity 02:39, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Trust coloring

message: also works on editor's userpages, showing their top targets, e.g. http://wikidashboard.parc.com/wiki/User:Raul654 --Quiddity 02:45, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikidashboard 

message: Do any other sorts of backups run against the wikipedia databases or is this the only backup method?
Is there a discussion page on this open somewhere so that others may be able to offer help or advice on getting this resolved asap?  I've not be able to find anything out, and it looks like the last enwiki backup was cancelled even before it started. I personally would like to see at least the pages-articles dumped out. Thanks. --Alun Liggins 16:26, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Database Dumps failing
Talk:Richard Hawkins (publisher)

message: I believe modern scholarship on the translation attributed to Oughtred says that the attribution was mistaken; the likely translator was Francis Malthus. See William Oughtred. Charles Matthews (talk) 19:45, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Correction made. Ugajin (talk) 10:00, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: By the way, since there seems to be some confusion about this (based solely on your comments here), this point should probably be cited. --Xover (talk) 10:39, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Private foundation (United States)

message: :  
Dgk00240 (talk) 02:54, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

message: I am missing here some details about the history of foundations. When has this started, what has been the size of all foundation? I will try to add this, or is this already somewhere else? Hints are welcome. Zukunft (talk) 08:25, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:Speedwriting

message: There aren't enough different keys on the keyboard to type the correct symbol in shorthand. "GET SOME" 02:53, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

message: The illustration in this article is not correct. In the Sheff version of Speedwriting, the m and w would be written as wide curves and "lazy" would be written with a comma at the end instead of an e. The illustration is not correct for the Dearborn or Pullis version either. Rikat (talk) 16:31, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: illustration
Talk:Twelfth Amendment of the Constitution Bill 1992

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Twenty-eighth Amendment of the Constitution of Ireland Bill, 2008 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RFC bot 00:01, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in process

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Third Amendment of the Constitution Bill, 1958 (Ireland) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 14:00, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Twenty-fifth Amendment of the Constitution Bill 2001

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Twenty-eighth Amendment of the Constitution of Ireland Bill, 2008 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RFC bot 00:01, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in process

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Third Amendment of the Constitution Bill, 1958 (Ireland) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 14:00, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Alice Beck Kehoe

message: This article should have some biographical information beyond Kehoe's scholarship. • Freechild'sup? 12:09, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article content

message: I've added a link to a biographical sketch that appears on the Scientific American website. It helps the article meet the verifiability requirement but the article still needs inline citations. Weldon Keys (talk) 07:07, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link
Talk:Toronto Supercell

message: Feel free to help me work on the article! I will add sources, images, and more data over the next few days. Theonlysilentbob 03:02, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just Created Article 

message: Will add source data and images eventually! Theonlysilentbob (talk) 04:38, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources/Images
Talk:KC2XAK

message: Antenna gain 20 with a 210 tower?  UNITS?
65.12.162.36 03:16, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Revised statute 2477

message: The article needs to make clear what this is, I'm assuming its some kind of legislative instrument of the United States Congress, but I don't know and the article doesn't say. Francis Davey (talk) 00:21, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Clearer NPOV indication

message: Good work, 12.46.250.10.  I have polished it up a little more, plenty more work to do on it, however.  Would be really good to get some more citations in there, and the political situation in Utah is a little different than elsewhere.  Please register as a wiki-user and continue the work, if you would.  Ratagonia (talk) 01:53, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fall 2008 revisions

message: ﻿It is believed that this law came out of thin air. That is far from the truth it is a restriction placed on an
1851 law
Chip  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.13.14.221 (talk) 15:12, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: rs2477
Talk:Chief of the Astronaut Office

message: I thought Deke Slayton was the first chief.  Slayton was originally slated to fly Mercury 7 in 1962, but was grounded by NASA Administrator James Webb due to a heart rhythm irregularity.  Between his grounding in 1962 and Alan Shepard's grounding in 1964 due to his Meniere's Syndrome, the active Mercury Seven astronauts made him the Chief of the Astronaut Office in order to prevent a non-astronaut from being brought in from the Air Force or Navy to boss the astronauts (then all of them military test pilots) to run the Astronaut Office.  Only in 1964 did Shepard took over as Chief of the Astronaut Office when Slayton became Director of Flight Crew Operations at JSC.
Yes, I feel that a huge omission from this page is the fact that the role was originally Deke's and only after Deke was promoted did Alan get the job. As Director of Flight Crew Op, Deke was all of the astronauts' boss, including the Chief Astronaut.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.163.32.110 (talk) 05:36, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slayton 

message: I removed a link in the Steve Lindsey row of the table. It was inserted in 2009 in this rev  but the article cited was the result of a search that expired, not the article itself. So there's no telling what this article was. Feel free to replace it with a link to an actual article. Wizardimps (talk) 19:24, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old link
Talk:List of styles of music: G–M

message: Some of the genres on this page are clearly made up; I tagged it for cleanup. Chubbles 03:38, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: No way.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.41.227.76 (talk) 19:24, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hamburger Schule = Hip Hop?! 

message: I wanted to enter the music genre "Lugaflow", which has millions of listeners in Uganda. But I came to find out that the genre does not have an article yet. I suggest that an article is established.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikael D. Mack (talk • contribs) 09:37, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  New entry - Lugaflow
Talk:Third Amendment of the Constitution of Ireland

message: I have started to add the local results from the referendum onto the article although this will take some time to  complaint so if anyone else feels they can continue it on my behalf then go for it. This referendum is historically important as it was the referendum that took Ireland into the European Union so the local results should be on here for all to view. (2A02:C7F:5621:2A00:A1C0:8255:74DE:9443 (talk) 16:06, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Local results
Talk:Fourth Amendment of the Constitution of Ireland

message: Shouldn't the article include the date the amendment was passed? Eatcacti (talk) 02:27, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date? 
Talk:Fifteenth Amendment of the Constitution of Ireland

message: Legislation may be repealed. One does not repeal the Constitution, one amends it by additions or deletions. The lead should not say "repealed". Laurel Lodged (talk) 16:04, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I have changed the wording to "remove". KISS! Snappy (talk) 16:09, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Repeal of a constitutional provision 

message: I was shocked and horrified to discover that this article seemingly makes no mention of wife-swapping sodomites  Tlhslobus (talk) 00:40, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  What a scandalously censored article {{smiley}}
Talk:Titus Leber

message: Should there be text before the table of contents on this page? That doesn't make sense.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by BlueRatchet (talk • contribs) 03:45, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: AFAIK there should be - the first bit of text is the 'lead' - it's just a quick intro. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry 03:48, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Text before ToC? 

message: The result was keep as notable, but needs cleaning up per WP:BLP. Bearian 23:52, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Shouldn't there be a link to the AfD discussion somewhere here? --Orange Mike 19:40, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  AfD
Talk:Ernst Geissler

message: Hmmm, copying public record facts isn't a copyright violation. The bolt is in error. --Joewski 03:49, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The bot detected several coincidences between what you wrote and what has been written, and it cannot determine by itself whether it is a copyvio or not. If you check www.astronautix.com/astros/geissler.htm you will notice you copied most of it from there literally. Even if they are public facts, if most the content is copied verbatim from somewhere else, it is usually deleted, or at least rewritten in your own words, so that you can really license the content under GFDL. -- ReyBrujo 03:25, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copywrite violation

message: This article has been reverted by a bot to  as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) This has been done to remove User:Accotink2's contributions as they have a history of extensive copyright violation and so it is assumed that all of their major contributions are copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. VWBot (talk) 06:19, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 
Talk:McDowell's

message: Is this article really necessary? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.239.169.48 (talk • contribs) 
:No, not really. It should probably be merged somewhere. Or maybe just deleted. But I don't know how to do that :( -- THE DARK LORD TROMBONATOR 20:53, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

message: I don't think this page should be merged!!!, Its such a great page!!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by MrTwinTowers (talk • contribs) 15:23, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Should not be deketed
Talk:Murray Levin

message: "Highly unpopular Korean War"?????
This sounds highly POV to me.  As a Communist, I have no doubt the Korean War would have been highly "unpopular" with Murray Levin (he wouldn't want to fight his collegues and "fellow travellors") but this makes the war sound "highly unpopular" with the General Public - a pure assertion, and one which is unsupportable IMHO.  Interviews I've seen with people about that war, including wives of POWs and other servicemen were alluding to the fact that even at the time the Korean War was largely ignored by the public at large.  There were no large scale anti-war demonstrations against Korea (in the US at any rate - a strong Communist Party organised some in places like France); nor have I heard of the sort of "draft dodging" that was associated with Vietnam either.  It is one thing to argue that the Korean War wasn't a "popular" one (i.e. the public were fully engaged and committed to it as they were to WWII) but quite another to say it was "unpopular" much less "highly unpopular".  If this phrase is meant to show Levin's OWN POV then it should be stated explicitly, otherwise it should be removed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.83.157.139 (talk) 15:50, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Third Amendment of the Constitution Bill 1958

message: Is the disambiguation of this article necessary and consistent with Wikipedia policies on disambguation and the naming of articles. Or should Third Amendment of the Constitution Bill, 1968 (Ireland) be moved to Third Amendment of the Constitution Bill, 1968? (The discussion also concerns several other similarly named articles).
Iota (talk) 13:51, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for comment

message: *Comment Previous relevant move discussion here. Dpmuk (talk) 14:42, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Votes
Talk:Third Amendment of the Constitution Bill 1968

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Twenty-eighth Amendment of the Constitution of Ireland Bill, 2008 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RFC bot 00:00, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in process

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Third Amendment of the Constitution Bill, 1958 (Ireland) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 14:00, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Fourth Amendment of the Constitution Bill 1968

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Twenty-eighth Amendment of the Constitution of Ireland Bill, 2008 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RFC bot 00:01, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in process

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Third Amendment of the Constitution Bill, 1958 (Ireland) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 14:00, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Tenth Amendment of the Constitution Bill 1986

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Twenty-eighth Amendment of the Constitution of Ireland Bill, 2008 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RFC bot 00:01, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in process

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Third Amendment of the Constitution Bill, 1958 (Ireland) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 14:00, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Template talk:Db-csd-notice

message: Quote: "Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article". I don't see any guidelines by that description; just some things about what *isn't* generally accepted. Is this confusing? Should it link to Wikipedia:Notability instead, or possibly just instruct the editor to indicate why the specified category for speedy deletion doesn't apply? --DocumentN 03:56, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

message: Is it me or has this template begun to misformat itself on user talk pages?  B1atv 14:09, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  malfunctioning template
Talk:Twenty-second Amendment of the Constitution Bill 2001

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Twenty-eighth Amendment of the Constitution of Ireland Bill, 2008 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RFC bot 00:01, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in process

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Third Amendment of the Constitution Bill, 1958 (Ireland) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 14:00, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Twenty-fourth Amendment of the Constitution Bill 2001

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Twenty-eighth Amendment of the Constitution of Ireland Bill, 2008 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RFC bot 00:01, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in process

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Third Amendment of the Constitution Bill, 1958 (Ireland) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 14:00, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Raymond Finkelstein

message: There's some pretty sketchy and un-encyclopaedic info happening here. Language v. informal, with a definite whiff of some dog-whistle stuff going on. 
But whatever, someone is probably just going to come along and delete the tag, and this talk page, and make it even worse. I would imagine some "supporters of free speech" might consider this tag as unfairly impinging upon their rights.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.224.48.247 (talk) 14:22, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I've reverted the non-neutral edits, as they were blatantly in violation of WP:NPOV. Robofish (talk) 18:26, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It still needs some help in the Independent Media Inquiry section. Cvsoft (talk) 03:00, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Some fairly long-standing vandalism was mentioned in Crikey today: Ten bleeds viewers … the Fink Wikied… vogue Jones …. -Canley (talk) 03:54, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 