lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Recombination frequency

message: :The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was moved. Ian Manka Talk to me! 17:31, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Oppose merge "Linkage" is a much more familiar term. It shouldn't be stuck inside an article on Recombination frequency, which fewer people would go to look up. Sfahey 02:58, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: Please add  * Support  or  * Oppose  followed by an optional brief explanation, then sign your vote using "~~~~".
* Support, but with lowercase "f" (i.e. Recombination frequency). David Kernow 11:57, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.</div>
Oppose merge "Linkage" is a much more familiar term. It shouldn't be stuck inside an article on Recombination frequency, which fewer people would go to look up. Sfahey 02:58, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey and discussion

message: There is confusion here between
* recombination frequency,
* recombination rate,
* genetic distance.
--Henri de Solages 17:27, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  (Confusion) 

message: The beginning poorly defines recombination frequency - its not "when crossing over takes place". Look at the wording, FREQUENCY. It is a mathematical number relating to how often something (recombination) occurs. Unfortunately for me, I don't know exactly what recombination is defined as, will someone please give me the reader's digest version of the defintion?Tourskin 22:08, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition
Talk:How to Design Programs

message: Our title should match the book's title, not an abbreviation.
===Voting===
:Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your vote with ~~~~
*Support --Doradus 17:33, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Add any additional comments
*Moved. --Bob Mellish 18:03, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: :Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your vote with ~~~~
*Support --Doradus 17:33, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Voting

message: :Add any additional comments
*Moved. --Bob Mellish 18:03, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Talk:This Bike Is a Pipe Bomb

message: http://www.flickr.com/search/?q=bike+pipe+bomb&l=5
CC-BY-SA images are available at that link for anyone interested in importing them to the Commons.  I might do some in a bit. gren グレン 12:08, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I only saw two images, neither applicable. However, I asked user:djcrb9 a.k.a. Cory if they'd be willing to relicense their photo of the sticker. Also, an SVG might be made of the wordmark and uploaded to Commons as PD-text. Arlo James Barnes 18:01, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images
Talk:Defiance, Ohio (band)

message: I think that the only significant way to discuss a band is through its music, a not its celebrity attributes. 
I know them by one sing, Oh Susquehanna, it is my exact view of real estate development: "and I wonder, where do they do with the bodies?" when developers maul burying grounds for malls.
It is helpful to show reflections of the band's ideas through song evolution, though in Defiance's case, I have not listened deeply to other songs.--John Bessa (talk) 19:54, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Songs and lyrics

message: I am a university researcher writing about punk rock. In my opinion this entry should not be deleted as the band had made a significant contribution to punk rock in the United States.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.100.54.213 (talk) 12:17, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Band significance 

message: I was planning on ending it but I took the tram (idk what above subways are called in San Diego) and listened to “share what ya got” on repeat on my phone 7 years ago. Thank you. I’ll always love you. 2603:8080:6B00:6D00:B5BD:CEB7:7796:B430 (talk) 09:26, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Defiance Ohio saved my life
Talk:Reborn (Star Wars)

message: i want to see reborn pictures the artical is to plain
*There is an odd redirect here on (to) this page from Wenceslas I, King of Bohemia.  Could somebody with the appropriate skills fix this and point this redirect to the correct page. Cosal 00:24, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As far as I can tell, it should be redirected to Venceslas I of Bohemia.  Cosal 00:26, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Uberto Zanolli

message: There may be copyright problems here. It's a close translation of the biography at the official website (© Betty Luisa Zanolli Fabila, Copyright, 2002). As such, it's a copyvio as a derived work, unless permission was given. Tearlach 17:41, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright

message: Translation it may be, but not into easily understandable English!!! Soem of the vocabulary is positively obscure. Emeraude 15:36, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Vocabulary
Talk:Universal manhood suffrage

message: "male" seems to be a more appropriate designation.
===Voting===
:Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your vote with ~~~~
*OPPOSE, not all males have suffrage, as the articles states it, only males of majority have suffrage. 132.205.45.148 19:30, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Add any additional comments
===Result===
It was requested that this article be renamed but there was no consensus for it to be moved. WhiteNight T | @ | C 03:02, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: :Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your vote with ~~~~
*OPPOSE, not all males have suffrage, as the articles states it, only males of majority have suffrage. 132.205.45.148 19:30, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Voting

message: It was requested that this article be renamed but there was no consensus for it to be moved. WhiteNight T | @ | C 03:02, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Result

message: According to multiple opinions at Talk:One man, one vote#Splitting proposal between One man, one vote and One person, one vote it seems One man, one vote and One person, one vote are same concept. Then it makes senso to merge Universal manhood suffrage into Universal suffrage. HudecEmil (talk) 18:47, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: They are the same concept because until quite recently "man" could be understood as "human being" / "person" of any gender. But "Universal manhood suffrage" is a different concept from "Universal suffrage" because one half of humanhood is excluded. Rsk6400 (talk) 09:41, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

text: In the 1820s and 1830s United States, the goal was to extend voting rights to all adult white males (which was actually a wider electorate than most other countries in the world at that time).  I don't think this limited reform should be confused with later wider reforms. AnonMoos (talk) 20:21, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Just to add: Not only was the electorate wider, but the laws were also more racist than in most other countries. Rsk6400 (talk) 20:53, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The exact laws depended on the individual state.  Racially homogeneous countries in the 1820s and 1830s didn't even face the issue. AnonMoos (talk) 21:32, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: "Racially inhomogeneous" ? The correct term used by historians for most of the American South is "slave society". But we are off topic. Rsk6400 (talk) 14:04, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: There were few slaves in the Northern States of the U.S. in the 1820s and the 1830s, and they were mostly getting kind of old... If you take pleasure in smugly condemning what you don't know much about, please do so at a location other than a Wikipedia article talk page. AnonMoos (talk) 06:17, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging with Universal suffrage
Talk:White Fathers

message: I disambiguated the link to Greek, so that it now points to Church of Greece. I'm not sure if this was correct meaning, as I'm not familiar with the topic. If someone more knowledgeable could correct it then I'd be most grateful. Soo 17:49, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Help wanted

message: Urgently requires updating - lots of "as of June 1909" is NOT good. I don't believe e.g. there is still a scholasticate at Carthage (might be wrong,but this article is mostly copied and pasted from a 1913 source!) TheGrappler (talk) 02:32, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs urgent update

message: I propose a name change of this article to 'Missionaries of Africa'. White Fathers is a nickname (mainly in French, Pères blancs), on the Italian, Spanish, Polish, Swahili and Portuguese page the article is also titled Missionaries of Africa. On the French page it states as the first phrase: 'Les Pères blancs, dont le nom officiel est Missionnaires d'Afrique'. If the official name is Missionnaires d'Afrique, then they are the Missionaries of Africa, often called the White Fathers. Would like feedback on this from other users.Dubito, ergo cogito, ergo sum (talk) 10:24, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Propose Name Change

message: This section of the article presents a mostly positive relationship between the Missionaries of Africa and Africans. This may be accurate, for all I know, but the two templates I've added combine to make me worried about this section. Perhaps the most important thing is that the majority of this section discusses the attitudes and actions of the Missionaries of Africa rather than of Africans. The section is hardly addressing its own subject. Even if there were sources that supported what the section says about the missionaries, that would have nothing to do with African perspectives. What is missing is Africans' own voices, and reliable sources that could relate those voices to us. Tikwriter (talk) 01:50, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality of 'African perspectives' section
Talk:Oleum

message: Expanded and corrected.
The only big mistakes were the description of equilibrium, which is inapplicable due to the pure acid being solid, and the statement that sulfur trioxide polymerises on contact with water.  I'm unsure of the carbon mass hardening after treatment of glucose with acid, so I'll leave it in.  Any comments on this? Ambix 17:53, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

message: Cleaned up some of the extraneous/conversational language throughout the article. No real content changes, just made it more readable. 97.82.247.200 00:46, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor Cleanup 

message: I do not understand how ten percent Oleum would mean H2SO4.0.1SO3. Shouldn't it be x gm of free SO3 for every 100 gm of Oleum? 
This Correction is needed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aksanoble (talk • contribs) 03:42, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Percent Oleum Calculation 

message: Too much on the formula and composition in the lead, and nothing on uses, origina of name, etc.  Led is supposed to be big picture, not details.  LeProf.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.175.244.80 (talk) 22:52, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poor lead. 

message: The article does not mention why the acid is fuming. Can somebody explain? 83.84.34.28 (talk) 18:29, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is it fuming 

message: In the Reaction section, the claim that oleum + sugar [sic] produces "pure carbon" demands an authoritative reference. As any good chemist should be able to tell you, sulfuric acid is an oxidizer which seems to contradict the claim that it reduces (the opposite of oxidation) sucrose to carbon. I made a half-hearted attempt to find an authoritative reference, but hit the good-old ACS paywall. Shakhashiri has/had a 5 (?) volume work (and his 1985 work (vol. 2?) *might* provide a good reference. (It's available from AMZN for ~$15; disclaimer: I'm not familiar with his work, so can't say if it contains suitable a bibliography)
It is very wrong to claim that "hydrogen elements of water are drawn out"! This is an obvious red flag that the editor has a poor (or nonexistent) grasp of the subject. Oleum dehydrates carbohydrates such as sugar (sucrose). (But I doubt the product is (reduced) carbon. Can't say for sure...some online sources say it is "ash", some "(polycondensed) pyrans and furans" some say CO2.) Note: this is a common - but dangerous - chemical demonstration. Sulfuric acid is a nasty chemical to work with (and SO2/SO3 are also bad). I recommend the mention of the Pharoh's Snake reaction be eliminated (sugar + sulf. acid).174.130.71.156 (talk) 20:34, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad information?
Talk:Nathan of Breslov

message: Maybe...and I don't know how to do this...but maybe this page should be renamed "Nathan of Breslov." Isn't he more commonly known as such? --Yodamace1 17:56, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: He is most commonly known as "Reb Nosson." But I would support a name change to Nathan of Breslov simply because it would stand out more on the Breslov page and get people to look at it, to find out who "else" lived in Breslov besides Rebbe Nachman. Yoninah 20:49, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

text: He's definitely better know for being from Breslov, particularly as the Hassidic sect he founded are also named for the town.  I support the move. Jayjg (talk) 23:15, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There are redirect pages both for Nathan of Nemirov and Nathan of Nemerov. Yoninah 14:46, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Maybe Wikipedia should present things like miraculous dreams as traditional stories rather than facts, no?  --Zero 13:06, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This story was retold by Reb Noson himself. I tried to amend the text to reflect that. Yoninah 20:13, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I deleted the dream altogether. The reason I put it in in the beginning was because the way the article was written seemed to demand it. Now I left only factual information about his life. Yoninah 14:46, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The dream
Talk:University of Virginia/Student groups

message: This edit summary is a lie -- you're not "correcting" a link. Please be honest in your edit summaries. To do otherwise is bad faith, and hurts Wikipedia. - Jim Apple
:Obviously, putting that tiny unofficial band as a link there while leaving out the actual marching band was your questionable version of "honesty", Jim. Scandalous. -Uris 00:08, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't put the unofficial band link there, it was there when I got there. There are several other unofficial organizations listed. You want to add the CMB to the links list? Good, so do I. But don't lie and call it "fixing". Jim Apple 05:36, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Do we need two of these conversations? I'm removing the link to the VPB. It is not a large or significant organization. -Uris 15:08, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It's significant enough to have a Wikipedia page; It has more members (dues paying and participating) than some of the other organizations listed. Since you don't like the VAPB, you don't get to be the arbiter of whether or not it's important. If you want it removed from the page (which is what this is about; I didn't add anything, you vandalized the page and tried to hide it up), then you need to provide justification besides your "not significant" hand-waving. Jim Apple 19:25, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I vandalized the page? You are ridiculous. I WROTE over 80% of this page. Why would I vandalize a page I contributed the great majority of content for? I simply would not stand for a link to the dinky Pep Band without a link to the actual Marching Band that all Hoos know and love. ;) Try to be a little more professional in your comments, please. -Uris 20:30, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I see you removed all unofficial links except for the Cavalier Daily. In my opinion, this discussion is now moot. If you wish to discuss my professionalism or why I think lying in edit summaries is vandalism, please visit my talk page. Jim Apple 22:04, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Student groups and external links
Talk:Japanther

message: Self congratulating on being "art project."  It's a lo-fi punk-ish band.  They tour, release records, and try to make money like other bands.  
Oh, the whole thing is horseshit? I'm slow. Sorry.
2602:306:CDFC:2090:C59D:227:B1E1:A6D3 (talk) 05:54, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subjective, Syncretic, Garble
Talk:WGR

message: Regarding this statement: WGR has been occasionally criticized for their disproportionate coverage of hockey, while dedicating an extremely small amount of time to college basketball and the NBA. This is despite the fact that the NHL is undeniably less popular on a national scale.
I really don't see the relevance of basketball's popularity "on a national scale."  Why note something like that?  You might as well note that soccer is more popular than both sports on an international scale, but that would be equally irrelevant to the matter at hand.
The fact is that WGR is not broadcasting to a national audience.  They are broadcasting to a local market (Buffalo, NY).  In that market, hockey is undeniably far more popular than basketball (either college or NBA).  So it is common sense that they would give hockey more coverage than basketball.
140.251.125.50 23:30, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Raphe nuclei

message: The article mentions "Their main function is to release serotonin to the rest of the brain".  What does this mean exactly?  I thought seratonin, and other NTs, were synthesized in each neuron.  Am I mistaken?  If the article is correct, this implies that seratonin is created in this center and distributed somehow to other parts of the brain for re-use.  If this indeed happens, please elaborate on this process.
--1000Faces (talk) 03:20, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure, but I think it means its kind of whats known as a sprinkler system.  Some systems synthesize large amounts of neurotransmitter that then are release to large areas instead of onto a single synapse.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.176.151.10 (talk) 18:22, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distribution of 5HT 

message: The connection between these areas, particularly between the nucleus raphe dorsalis and the orbital cortices, is thought to have influences on depression and obsessive compulsive disorder prognosis. There is no data suggesting any correlation between serotonin and depression and the citation you provide is strictly an anatomical study performed in rats. 68.96.239.121 (talk) 04:47, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link between serotonin and depression 

message: A user recently added a hoax tag to the article without proper explanation. Please discuss such things on the article talk page before doing them in the future. 0x69494411 15:39, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hoax Tag
Talk:Shek Kip Mei

message: As part of the rewrite to improve the English, I have removed the following sentence: 
:The people in those apartments shared one toilet
This is because I couldn't work out if it was one toilet per appartment of 5 people, one toilet per block of appartments or some other group? Please add it back if you know and can make it clear. Thryduulf 18:07, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

message: The section is entirely unsourced. Also, I am not convinced that the incident written about in the 'crimes' section has any great direct relevance to the subject. Other than the fact that the girl came to the area, the story appears to be only of tangential relevance and should be removed. If the incident is indeed notable, it would deserve its own WP article. Ohconfucius (talk) 03:05, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Crimes' section
Talk:Keynote (notetaking software)

message: There is already a [Keynote (Software)].
This two articles should be combined. 82.155.193.114 18:13, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: No, they should not be combined.  They are two completely different apps.  Keynote (Software) is presentation software for the Apple Macintosh platform and is produced by Apple Computer.  Keynote (Tranglos) is notetaking and outlining software for Windows produced by Tranglos.  If anything, Keynote (Software) should be renamed Keynote (Apple), and Keynote (Software) could then become a disambiguation page for the two articles. Canonblack 20:06, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

text: The talk page is for discussion of changes to this article.  It is not a forum for posting advertisements or for the discussion of topics irrelevant to the subject of this article. 12.22.250.4 17:34, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I just removed an edit that seemed to say Keynote was based on Treepad. I'm sorry for taking it out if it turns out this is true but looking at this page it seems more like an advert. Id2d (talk) 01:10, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

text: I would not say that Keynote was based on Treepad. The software source of Keynote is based on Microsoft rich text editor tool, while the authors of Treepad developed a fully original approach that looks rather attractive. Bulatov (talk) 20:34, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

message: The original developer Marek Jedliński has recognized KeynoteNF as the followup for his abandoned Keynote project one year ago. I think KeynoteNF with download link and current version should be listed in the infobox instead of an old release of Keynote that isn't fully compatible with the current (v1.7) file format.--94.222.119.252 (talk) 12:26, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  KeynoteNF is official continuation 

message: Sadly, it looks like their website doesn't work anymore. SX3001 (talk) 13:11, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tranglos Website Status 

message: It's actually spelled KeyNote, with "camel-case" capital N. (Here's a screenshot at MindMapping.org). I don't know how to change the spelling of the title of a WP article—will someone with the power please do that? – AndyFielding (talk) 09:18, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fix app's spelling? 

message: Because of Daniel Prado's resumed work on the official KeyNote site, and his declared work on the program itself, the sentence I removed is now obsolete. Tireisias (talk) 11:59, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please check my recent edit.
Talk:Sarah Balabagan

message: The wording of this article is a clear violation of Wikipedia:NPOV. The details are presented in a light utterly in favor of one version of events. For the record, I think Ms. Balabagan was probably innocent of murder and acting in self-defense. However, to be neutral, we cannot present such a blatantly one-sided POV version of events as has been done here. I just copyedited the article to correct and add details, as well as reworded for neutrality.--AladdinSE 10:17, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think international opinion accepted her version of events. PatGallacher 12:26, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyedit and NPOV 

message: I've been reading over some of the earlier versions and the present version of the article. It seems pretty NPOV to me. I have nothing complain about. Good job. Celcius 03:27, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfC Comments