Talk:Capital Area Transportation Authority

message: Does anyone want to add a section about the Michigan - Grand River Avenue Transportation Study that CATA has sponsored?  I'd do it, but I'd rather someone else who more regularly manages the page work it in. --Criticalthinker (talk) 09:27, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Anyone want to do this?  If not, I'll try and fit a section in about it soon, given that the study is three-fourths of the way through (completed this summer), and very well could find that Lansing could support light rail or bus rapid transit along the Michigan - Grand River Avenue corridor. --Criticalthinker (talk) 11:51, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Transit Study

message: I've added quite a bit of information to this article in order to get it up to speed with all the other transportation authority/company pages... of course there's still a lot to do.  I plan on adding information on accessibility and the bus fleet itself soon.
Shadowlink1014
*Thank you, very much, Shadow.  The page is looking impressive. I try to regularly update alot of Metro Lansing's pages, and they are getting better by the month. --Criticalthinker 01:54, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem  :)  --Shadowlink1014 14:52, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updates 

message: Aren't there D60LF's numbered in the 5000's also?  --Shadowlink1014 23:49, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bus fleet 

message: Looks like CATA is going to be helping us with this article!  I sent an e-mail to them, here is their reply:
CATA is in the process of updating the CATA Wikipedia listing.  It should be completed in the next two weeks as we are in a peak project phase right now.  The feature of Wikipedia that allows any and all to edit content makes it a challenge to maintain.  It also undermines its credibility as Wikipedia information is not always from a knowledgeable source.  Despite this, we understand many individuals use the site so we will periodically review the listing and update.  Thank you for your letter.
--Shadowlink1014 14:54, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  E-mail from CATA on this page 

message: What's deal with trolleys on this route? I've (exclusively) seen normal D40LF buses working on it - on the several occasions I came across the route. The info has to change on the front page... I think.
:This Lansing City Pulse article, which was written about when the Route #4 trolley opened back last year, mentions that the trolleys are used during the day in Delhi Township.  According to the article, Dragoo said this... here's the link:    --Shadowlink1014 22:18, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I'd consider LSJ to be reputable source; it's possible that the situation has changed since the article was written.  Anyway, I'll update route 19.  Thanks for the info.  ^_^  --Shadowlink1014 09:15, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  route 19 

message: I suggest that the section of the article be substantially toned down and instead be incorporated into some other section of the article with just a brief mentioning of its main point, if necessary.
The section should be eliminated because it gives an impression of unwarranted optimism as to time proximity of such an implementation, when in reality it may take a couple of decades before the project is realized, IF it ever becomes realized.  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 76.238.63.158 (talk) 17:07:08, August 19, 2007 (UTC) 
::I contacted CATA and they said that the study hasn't even started yet, due to lack of funding (although they had previously told me that it had...)  Yeah, I'll remove it. --Shadowlink1014 23:54, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  future expansion section 

message: Any info on this series?
http://flickr.com/photos/9384698@N02/2143482231  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.147.170.253 (talk) 23:18, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flxible 403 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Capital Area Transportation Authority. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070315181542/http://www.cata.org:80/docs/CommunityReport.pdf to http://www.cata.org/docs/CommunityReport.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930020434/http://lsj.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20061211/NEWS01/612110323 to http://lsj.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20061211/NEWS01/612110323
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928002645/http://www.lsj.com/news/local/030722_draggoo_3b.html to http://www.lsj.com/news/local/030722_draggoo_3b.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060118161820/http://www.cata.org:80/ to http://www.cata.org
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:13, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Since 2019 CATA has completely discontinued the entertainment express on route 4 including selling their trolley busses, and implemented the Route 18. In addition, CATA has removed all primary links to the BRT project from their website. Is it time we gave the entire page a good refreshing? If so, my one concern would be the ongoing restricted pandemic services which are in the process of being relaxed. 
Also I question how long we should keep Route 41 as discontinued given that other discontinued routes such as route 19 were dropped from the page.
Davidhasahead (talk) 23:09, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  2022 Updates/ Pandemic-Post Pandemic schedules?