Talk:Ukraine–European Union relations

message: Just made a "pro Ukrainian EU-membership" "userbox" feel free to copy it! Mariah-Yulia 15:19, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Userbox 

message: :Image:Benita Ferrero-Waldner with Viktor Yushchenko.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 02:25, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Benita Ferrero-Waldner with Viktor Yushchenko.jpg

message: See here. Bit too WP:NEWS for now. Article does not say what legal consequences this has.... Looks completely weird to me.... — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 16:55, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: nothing particularly strange. The text of the agreement was not ready, nor there was political will to initial it at the Dec 19 summit, so the next temptative date is Feb 15. Only the English version, I guess, because the EU would not have enough time to check whether the Ukrainian version is thoroughly translated in legal terms. --Dans (talk) 00:24, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Newspaper: Brussels wants to initial association agreement on February 15, but only English version 

message: Probably a bit to much WP:NOT#NEWSREPORTS; (but) the European Commission & the Ukrainian Foreign Ministry seem to have 2 different views on the speed of implement EU recommendation (in Ukraine):
*Kyiv fails to implement most EU recommendation in 2012, according to ENP progress report
*Foreign Ministry: Kyiv actively implementing approved plan on EU integration — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 18:26, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  On implementing EU recommendation 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Georgia (country)–European Union relations which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 06:02, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Georgia–European Union relations which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 09:47, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: ... with regard to the European Union Association Agreement-signing. See here and here. — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 18:15, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: PS See above message as "storing references for later use". — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 18:17, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[A Change Is Gonna Come]]... 

message: Please do not put simplistic non-true sentences like "Relations with the EU currently stand suspended" into the article. According to high level EU-diplomats there is still has a chance to sign the EU-Ukraine Association Agreement + today Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych said ""An alternative for reforms in Ukraine and an alternative for European integration do not exist". So there is clearly a wish on both sides to continue Ukraine–European Union relations. — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 20:29, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Relations with the EU currently stand suspended" 

message: Any else think that there should be an article titled "Accession of Ukraine to the European Union", they're obviously intrested (at least many of their people are) and so is the EU (well, maybe not with Viktor Yanukovych in charge). Charles Essie (talk) 17:19, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: New article?

message: The current lead is inadequate and needs rewriting urgently. It is fine for people from the EU and Ukraine that understand what's going on but not for people that are not from the EU, particularly its partners from Canada and the United States. Western readers from the Americas need to understand what's going on. Can someone familiar with the subject rewrite it in a concise manner? —Ahnoneemoos (talk) 18:03, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I did my best today to make the lead better readable and updated it. Is it more understandable now? I think the lead should also contain some info about pre-2012 Ukraine–European Union relations. But I am a bit worried that would make the lead too long. — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 23:01, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead rewrite needed 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 8 external links on European Union–Ukraine relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140125161035/http://main.omanobserver.om/?p=34172 to http://main.omanobserver.om/?p=34172
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050524013702/http://www.euobserver.com/?sid=24&aid=17977 to http://www.euobserver.com/?sid=24&aid=17977
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050524014007/http://www.euobserver.com/?sid=24&aid=18004 to http://www.euobserver.com/?sid=24&aid=18004
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100422121915/http://ec.europa.eu/external_relations/ukraine/index_en.htm to http://ec.europa.eu/external_relations/ukraine/index_en.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140913190204/http://www.ceps.eu/system/files/simplenews/2011/05/NWatch80.pdf to http://www.ceps.eu/system/files/simplenews/2011/05/NWatch80.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130826113833/http://www.publicserviceeurope.com/article/3972/ukraines-eu-deal-good-or-bad-for-the-oligarchs to http://www.publicserviceeurope.com/article/3972/ukraines-eu-deal-good-or-bad-for-the-oligarchs
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110819133013/http://konoplyanik.ru/ru/publications/articles/410-JENRL-11.2006.pdf to http://konoplyanik.ru/ru/publications/articles/410-JENRL-11.2006.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060220011334/http://europa.eu.int/comm/world/enp/pdf/050523_extra_update_faq.pdf to http://europa.eu.int/comm/world/enp/pdf/050523_extra_update_faq.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:04, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Given the application already submitted by Ukraine, would be apt now to rename the page--WeifengYang (talk) 05:41, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename the page into "Accession of Ukraine to the European Union?" 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Not moved. There may be consensus to split the page, but that can be discussed/done separately.   Calidum 19:10, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Ukraine–European Union relations →  – As things were changed and European Parliament submitted Ukraine's application. MiskoGe (talk) 20:29, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 1 March 2022 

message: As things were changed and European Parliament submitted Ukraine's application. However, the move request was rejected, while 4 out of 6 voters either supported or agreed with splitting the "Proposed European Union membership" section to the separate page as "having substantially more information on Ukraine's prospect of joining the EU that would provide sufficient material and developments to merit the name change or its own separate page". --MiskoGe (talk) 15:23, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed split 16 March 2022