Talk:Warriors (novel series)/Nov 2007

message: I think that there's enough info for it to get it's own article. The cover's even been found and released to the general public. I tried uploading it but I'm not sure if I did everything right. If no one has any objections I'm going to create it. ClawClaw 20:48, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, as long as there's enough information that it won't be instantly up for speedy deletion, then I have no arguments. Just remember to cite any given information in the article as you do so, otherwise it might be considered speculation and such. And we'll help along the way if you need any. Good luck! :) §ροττεδςταr(Talk|Contribs) 21:05, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There. I did the best I could. If someone could look it over that would be wonderful... ClawClaw 21:30, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Warrior's Refuge

message: I created an article for Warrior's Return as well. ClawClaw 22:05, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Warrior's Return

message: I remember seeing a mention of this somewhere in the discussions before but it was recently released on warriorcats.com. I was wondering if we should make a mention of it anywhere in the article.
~Rainclaw (NOT Rainpaw)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.247.1.36 (talk) 20:59, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hm, good idea, but where would we put it?  BTW, Rainclaw, you should set up a User Account on Wikipedia, so it doesn't always seem like you're an unsigned user.  Wouldn't it be nice to have a user page and everything, plus record all the great edits you'll make to articles?   Spottedstripe(Talk2Me) 02:02, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe put it in it's own section? (By the way, Rainpaw is my little brother and when I used the warrior name game thing I got Rainclaw he got Rainpaw) ~Rainclaw  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.215.85.163 (talk) 15:27, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I understand the Warriors names.  Anyway, as nice as that sounds, I know someone will come storming in and delete an article about the play if we created one, saying "You don't have enough information." and things like that.  However, you know, we don't have to metion every single Warriors thing on Wikipedia...the article would be huge!  That's what fan sites are for.   Spottedstripe(Talk2Me) 22:31, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

text: Confirmed?  No, it has not.  I'm going to keep saying that, unless it is confirmed to be canon, we shouldn't mention it, because it doesn't deserve mentioning otherwise. --~|ET|~(Talk|Contribs) 01:58, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: True, it's not confirmed confirmed as canon to the story (though I think Vicky said that we may be able to get some hints about PoT from it), although its existance is pretty true. The article has a section just to say that plans for a Warriors film aren't in production. I don't think mentioning the play could hurt. It is, after all, a work related to the series... TakaraLioness 02:21, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

text: Vicky did write it. In her tour diary entry for 28 April  2007, it says, "This event saw the World Premire of After Sunset: We Need To Talk, the short play that I wrote especially for this tour." TakaraLioness 23:01, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The Play

message: I was thinking that the leads for the different warrior series (The Original, The New Prophecy, Power of Three) tshould include the prophecys they revolve around. ~Rainpaw  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.239.225.209 (talk) 20:31, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not a bad idea. I wouldn't mind having the initial prophecies ("Fire alone" for the original, "Darkness, air, etc" for TNP, "There will be three" for Po3) on each little thing, but I'm not sure if we need every single one listed. Maybe all of those that've appeared in the series could be put into another article? Perhaps we could add prophecies to the Clan article. TakaraLioness 23:21, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: A Suggestion

message: I've heard rumors that The Dark River will be released Oct. 2007, Dec. 26, 2007 and Jan. 2008.  Both the main article and the Dark River article itself have Dec. 26.  When is the real release date?!   Spottedstripe(Talk2Me) 18:37, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Amazon says December, I think, while some other sites say January. Vicky thought the book would be out in October because that was when she was touring the U.S. again, but she wasn't sure. I think we can take October off of the list. My guess is that the date is the December one. TakaraLioness 19:22, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: My best guess would be the Amazon date too. Before Metros deletd the Dark River article, I had added Amazon's release info, but it was still removed. Bella Swan 14:57, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Same thing about Warriors Refuge.  I've heard both October and December.  Are both Warriors Refuge and The Dark River going to be released Dec. 26?   Spottedstripe(Talk2Me) 21:35, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

text: Yes, I think so. I think they'll be released on the same day, just as TLW and TS were. TakaraLioness 21:50, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, OK.  I thought so.  Maybe book 3 of the manga and Outcast will be released on the same day too.   Spottedstripe(Talk2Me) 23:47, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

text: Oh, are you a resident of Cananda?   Spottedstripe(Talk2Me) 00:59, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dark River release date 

message: :Image:Warriors (box set 1-3).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 23:15, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Uh, OK, does anyone know who posted the image in the first place?  They should have an explanation.   Spottedstripe(Talk2Me) 00:58, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I put together a rationale. Nothing complicated, but I'm fairly sure it should meet the requirements. Kitsufox 12:54, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I figured I'd put this here because it applies to almost all Warriors books, but I've added rationals to all the images that were marked as not having rationals on their respective pages. ~ Bella Swan 20:32, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Warriors (box set 1-3).jpg