Talk:Pongamia

message: There are a series of common names for this tree. Adding every alternate name this tree has would probably overwhelm the article. I am removing the name - kanuga in telugu - from the article as of now. If someone else can come up with a compelling reason to keep it, feel free to reinsert it, but please state your reason here. 
Killian441 (talk) 19:11, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, the edit you reverted was clearly putting the name in the wrong place, so no objections to that.  My general philosophy is that we should provide the names used when writing in English, and leave the others to dictionaries and interwiki links. Not sure how far I'd push this (especially for plants which are not commonly discussed in English). Kingdon (talk) 20:56, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

text: Toxicity is a complicated subject; there is a level below which even a very toxic substance will show no toxic effects. This reference states that both the oils and residues are toxic and then goes into great detail regarding the traditional uses including for stomach problems. The article does mention this fact, but it is not followed by a reference, so I will add it in. Killian441 (talk) 15:39, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Names in other languages 

message: According to The Plant List, Millettia pinnata appears to be a synonym of Pongamia pinnata. So should we use the latter name? MKwek (talk) 08:22, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The Plant List uses information from International Legume Database & Information Service which hasn't been updated since 2006. The ILDIS has two relevant entries, one for Pongamia pinnata and one for Millettia pinnata, both entries refer to the same basionym (Fabaceae Cytisus pinnatus) but don't seem to refer to each other. Millettia pinnata has the newer entry dating to 1989, while Pongamia pinnata dates to 1899. Since Pongamia has the longer history it will have more references, but from what I've been reading consensus is in favor of replacing Pongamia with Millettia. In fact, the Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History has a record of the proposal that the genus Pongamia be rejected in favor of Millettia in the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature (ICBN). It was first proposed in 1981, and looks like it was ratified in 1988. In 2011 the United States Department of Agriculture updated its database and made Pongamia pinnata a synonym of Milletia pinnata. Given that the Plant List is mostly an algorithmically generated database based on multiple sources it is perhaps not surprising that entries such as this will not reflect the new consensus. I believe the name Millettia pinnata is the more correct name at this point and should be kept. -Killian441 (talk) 18:46, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

text: Hi, as mentioned above it was ratified that "Millettia" would replace "Pongamia" in 1988. Many other sources have not been updated yet. The International Legume Database & Information Service website is upgrading and currently under construction. Perhaps after it comes back online with updated data we can continue this discussion. -Killian441 (talk) 02:26, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Correct name

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Millettia pinnata. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120426092429/http://tve.org/ho/doc.cfm?aid=1433&lang=English to http://www.tve.org/ho/doc.cfm?aid=1433&lang=English
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:09, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Millettia pinnata. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100623093752/http://beahrselp.berkeley.edu/reports/03indiaprop.html to http://beahrselp.berkeley.edu/reports/03indiaprop.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110726151654/http://www.himalayaninstitute.org/pdf/SeedsofHope.pdf to http://www.himalayaninstitute.org/pdf/SeedsofHope.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:06, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Millettia pinnata. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160117130917/http://factnet.winrock.org/fnrm/factnet/factpub/FACTSH/P_pinnata.html to http://factnet.winrock.org/fnrm/factnet/factpub/FACTSH/P_pinnata.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070825002528/http://www.himalayaninstitute.org/humanitarian/biofuelsenergyfarming.aspx to http://www.himalayaninstitute.org/Humanitarian/BiofuelsEnergyFarming.aspx
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141227215637/http://www.millettiaplantations.com/ to http://www.millettiaplantations.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:33, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018) 

message: 1. In paragraph 3 of the description section, add "in natural form" so that the last sentence reads 
"The seeds are about 1.5–2.5 centimetres (0.59–0.98 in) long with a brittle, oily coat and are unpalatable in natural form to herbivores.[5][6]" 
*Reason for the change: they are unpalatable only in natural form 
*References supporting change: https://www.foodnavigator-asia.com/Article/2020/08/04/Going-carbon-negative-TerViva-establishes-world-first-organic-pongamia-bean-supply-chain-in-India
: Hello, the provided source says nothing to support this request. However, the page citation does support this request. Done. Heartmusic678 (talk) 16:36, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: (ref name=daff_AU/)  Heartmusic678 (talk) 17:11, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

text: Done. This fact was taken verbatim from , so I revised it. Heartmusic678 (talk) 17:11, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

text: Done with minor revisions. Heartmusic678 (talk) 17:24, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

text: Removed Miami-Dade reference. Found evidence to keep first part of sentence, . Heartmusic678 (talk) 17:46, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

text: Done, but provided reference doesn't support the request. Found one to support what was previously written in Uses paragraph 3 and another to support the general uncertainty of the nativity of M. pinnata in the regions it can be found. Heartmusic678 (talk) 13:41, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Edits  

message: The links in reference 18 don't appear to be working or they've been archived.
I was able to find other references to the idea of using this plant's oil for use in generators to produce electricity, although it may simply be that they've sourced this information from this Wikipedia page:
https://www.liquisearch.com/millettia_pinnata/uses/research_efforts
Hasnah, T., Leksono, B., Sumedi, N., Windyarini, E., Adinugraha, H. A., Baral, H., & Artati, Y. (2020, October). Pongamia as a Potential Biofuel Crop: Oil Content of Pongamia pinnata from the Best Provenance in Java, Indonesia. In 2020 International Conference and Utility Exhibition on Energy, Environment and Climate Change (ICUE) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
Scott, P. T., Pregelj, L., Chen, N., Hadler, J. S., Djordjevic, M. A., & Gresshoff, P. M. (2008). Pongamia pinnata: an untapped resource for the biofuels industry of the future. Bioenergy Research, 1(1), 2-11.
Tzali (talk) 22:44, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links in reference 18 don't appear to be working