Talk:American City Business Journals

message: Individual journal articles being considered for deletion here. Improbcat 16:07, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: AfD for sub-articles

message: There are a serious of minor break off articles from this article which were discussed for deletion. Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_Business_Review. There was no consensus to delete or keep. In cases like this the best option is a merge because then the information is kept in the appropriate place, and it builds the main article. A merge is not a deletion. The material remains. And a search for the material finds it directly if the redirect uses the right coding (#). There was some growing support for a merge. Notice being posted to allow for any opposition to a merge to be raised. SilkTork *** SilkyTalk 13:47, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm opposed to merge of Business First in particular due to reasons I stated in the Afd.  The article is a stub today, but that's only because it's still new and hasn't been expanded yet. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 14:30, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You objected to the article being deleted. This is not a deletion. The article will remain. It will be in a situation where it will get more not less traffic. It is a move from an isolated location to a supported location. If/when it grows beyond a couple of paragraphs is the time for it to become a stand alone article. I've merged Memphis Business Journal as an example to show you how it works.  SilkTork *** SilkyTalk 15:55, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

text: I"m opposed to the merge of this article.  It's already fairly long.  It's where a number of pages have been merged and represents a logical grouping of these kinds of publications.--Rtphokie (talk) 12:41, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: This has been removed as per WP:NLIST - list of notable persons. Mtking (edits)  03:19, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Forty under 40 Award '07 winners 

message: The article Chicago Business Journal redirects here, but it is not listed in the table under Newspapers section. Does American City Business Journals own the Chicago Business Journal, or is it a faulty link? — 67.180.24.57 (talk) 20:22, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Nevermind. I found the answer here and added it to the list. — 67.180.24.57 (talk) 20:28, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chicago Business Journal 

message: See:
*Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 288#Business Journals / bizjournals.com
The consensus was these publications (except for clearly marked sponsored articles) are very reliable.
--A. B. (talk • contribs  •  global count) 04:34, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reliability as a source for Wikipedia articles 

message: I am not editing this article directly as I have a COI in that I work directly for ACBJ. 
That said -- 
(1) Under external links, the article has https://www.thebizjournals.com/ but that is not owned by ACBJ. The link should be https://www.bizjournals.com To us this is a pretty big error. 
(2) Under City business publications:
We do not own the following -- 
* Bellingham Business Journal
* Hartford Business Journal
(3) Many of these publications do not have wikipedia pages (Atlanta Business Chronicle for example) yet some do like Jacksonville Business Journal
(4) We no longer own Inside Lacrosse.
(5) Cleveland, Chicago, New York, Providence and LA are all online-only. Also, Providence is new. DrobertsACBJ (talk) 16:10, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I have fixed the link and will take a look at the other suggested changes later today. Eric Schucht (talk) 17:46, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. These changes are appreciated :) DrobertsACBJ (talk) 17:10, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits for the ACBJ Article