lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:WOTX

message: Outlaw 102.3 was a prior holder of the callsign of WOTX located in Concord New Hampshire.  The Outlaw 102.3 web site is defunct.  The alleged Arbirton source for the format information returns an error indicating there is no data for the station for the period.StreamingRadioGuide (talk) 23:57, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Book hidden face of credit

message: this article was written in an neutral and informative way, some one else can make corrections or additions since that is my understanding of the process. It it not discussing if the book is excellent but rather narrating its content the same layout approach I found in other articles about books.
Can someone make appropriate corrections and additions? Someone impartial which has wikipeadia extensive experience (I am new at this.... and the experience has been frustating at best...
As per the comments on notability? Do the people who made the comments speak french? Did they spent 5 years studying credit and consumer credit? If yes then their comments are valid otherwise their merely express their personal opinion and are not based on fact....
This book was accepted by Quebecor leading published in French Canada. They received over 2000 manuscripts out of which they publish 20 that is about 1% success rate. They only publish if the authors have the credential and the reputation on the topic matter.
I have been asking for help from someone experienced to re-write this article the correct way to be acceptable (since there seems so remarks on the contents).
The book is not for sale so the object is publication of free knowledge on an important topic not commercial one.
There seems to be lots of note on the world notable. Please list me practical books on consumer credit (not that many). However books on hacking and programming enough to drawn on.
I read the tag "Free Encyclopedia" -- I am getting the message NOTABLE, CLOSED and FOR ELITE writers only encyclopedia. Contributions not welcome. For help just read the instructions and links provided, if we don't understand them, we must therefore not be qualified to contribute. If this is the reaction someone with good intentions to share knowledge gets I wonder what is the response to the less computer knowledgeable person.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by JorgeS (talk • contribs) 13:47, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

message: Sorry for wasting everyones time and effort. Please delete the article. I have reached the following conclusions:
- the tag line "the free encyclopedia" is misleading
- it is not worth the discussion or the time already spent
- it is academic
- it is only for NOTABLE wikipedian elite, should consider new name Notable-pedia
- it is part of web 1.0
- if found KNOL web 2.0
- the free web will always moves faster and the elite can not stop free knowledge distribution
- good luck for wikipedia all the best
- all the best 
- please also delete my ID as I will not be back 
Regards
JorgeS (talk) 22:18, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ladies and Gentlemen Please Delete article
Talk:Andrew Jolivette

message: I have added the  template to this article as it titles Jolivette as Professor in some places and Doctor in others. I suspect the article has been incompletely edited to update his title from Doctor to Professor? --Romney yw (talk) 10:36, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doctor or Professor 

message: I'm trying to fill out more of what one of the books was about (Indian Blood) because it relates to a page I am creating for BAAITS. But I think in general it might be good if all the books had a little more detail about what they are on.Stayhomegal (talk) 23:03, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indian Blood 

message: It appears that every few months or so, the subject of this article edits it through IP addresses, like this diff from a San Diego IP or this diff, resulting in verbose peacocky, promotional language and problems with conflicts of interest and self-promotion. Numerous places already exist to promote oneself and one's accomplishments (LinkedIn, Academia.edu, etc.), but Wikipedia is not an appropriate place for such behavior. This article should keep a neutral point of view and stick to reliable, cited information of an encyclopedic nature. Icecube77 (talk) 00:26, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI/self-promo concerns
Talk:The Big Empty (2003 film)

message: Maybe this article already gives too much of the plot away; but an important detail that's missing from it is the "blue" theme of the entire movie: most especially including the blue eyes of the apparent aliens -- including Grace, at the end. Which gives a whole new spin on the ending (pun intended).
Pazouzou (talk) 01:41, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: +1 about the blue eyes. —Sburke (talk) 18:23, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot
Talk:Jampur

message: This page is absolutely horribly written. I'll attempt to clean it up a bit --Tombomp (talk) 10:55, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

message: Tehsil Jampur is attractive for investers as it is very good place for business. Maliksamiullah (talk) 09:27, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Business
Talk:Spearwood railway station

message: I've added a photo, but it's not brilliant. Sam Wilson 09:33, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo
Talk:The Colours Match

message: Colours Matches in Other Sports
Colours Matches are not always in Rugby, UCD vs Trinity in any stand alone match is referred to as a Colours match. I feel the article needs to be edited to reflect this. Rugby may have the best kept records, but Rowing, GAA, Water Polo & almost every sports club that exists in both universities has a Colours Match Annually. 
Swimming & Water Polo is my area of involvement, but I know the Boat (Rowing) Clubs have had Colours Matches on the Liffey for years.
Thedecline (talk) 00:57, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:University College Dublin R.F.C.

message: The box asking for more sources of information is no longer required, plenty of links to match reports and an article on university rugby in Ireland have been added.Ruggermcdonnybrook (talk) 18:19, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Pont d'Arcole

message: "Called the passerelle de Grève for the first two years of its life". In the 1839 Plan de Paris of Ambroise Tardieu, what name does it carry? The Napoleonic overtones of "Pont d'Arcole" are more likely to be applied to the rebuilding under the French Second Empire, and very unlikely before 1850.--Wetman (talk) 17:14, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: "passerelle de Grève"
Talk:Ron

message: I added multiple people with the surname Ron, and a bunch of other uses. Though there are over a thousand people with the given name Ron, I didn't update the given names section. I did add a  template to list articles starting with "Ron". I propose that the given name section be deleted because it's not useful for disambiguation purposes and it's difficult to maintain. If there's a consensus or at least no objection, I'll delete the given names in about a week. Thank you.
:Seeing no objection, I'll make the change. SchreiberBike (talk) 15:30, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Given names

message: Why is Ron Weasley from Harry Potter not mentioned? I made to put it in, but something at the top said that I can't.
Ex-Borg Seven of Nine (talk) 19:01, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ron Weasley
Talk:Melaleuca rhaphiophylla

message: Photo added.Aussie Oc (talk) 16:20, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Mission Dolores Park

message: Oct. 27 2009: Why does it say the park is "two blocks tall by one block wide"? It's 4 blocks wide by one block tall, if you were standing at the "entrance on Dolores st. and 19th looking toward Church st. Look at the map.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.5.173.107 (talk) 04:20, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

message: This photo is really unrepresentative of the park.  First, it's a photo of 10% of the park, and not even from the top where the panoramic view can be found.  Second, most of the photo is of a dry field.  I suggest removing this photo and replacing it.  I'll try to do this asap. —Viriditas | Talk 10:45, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Replaced lead image with :Image:Dolores park.jpg.  This is still only about 50% of the park.  I did find panoramic views of the entire park on flickr that were appropriately licensed, but they were of poor quality. —Viriditas | Talk 11:19, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:Image:Dolorespark.jpg]] 

message: Someone should update this article with information on the renovation and closure: SFist, Uptown Almanac, San Francisco Recreation and Parks Department (PDF)
--209.2.219.250 (talk) 19:22, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dolores Park renovation and closure 
Talk:South Wonston

message: Some of the claims there seem to be unverifiable by a quick Google search. Zedrox (talk) 14:19, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: That mostly looked like gossipy drivel so I removed a lot of it leaving enough to say that the team exists. If there are good sources then it can be built back up a bit but should not grow to dominate the whole article. --DanielRigal (talk) 22:01, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can we get some citations on the Swifts section primarily?
Category talk:Oil pipeline companies

message: Does anyone think there is any point to this category (which looks very odd to me)? What is an oil pipeline company supposed to be? Any oil company with a pipe? 
Any defenders before it goes to MfD? --BozMo talk 12:03, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Oil pipeline company is the company that construct and produce oil pipelines. It can be different or the same as oil (exploration) company. Because there are many business sectors in oil industries, such as exploration, refinery, transportation (oil tanker, including this pipeline), oil rig manufacturer etc. Chongkian (talk) 12:09, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

message: oil pipeline companies manage oil pipelines, like natual gas pipeline companies manage natural gas pipelines.  Each article in the category indicates the company runs oil pipelines, either as its sole business of part of other work.   What is so bothersome about this category?  It did not exist to cover this function; it now exists.  Hmains (talk) 05:09, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Not bothersome just looks completely pointless. I question whether this is ever a useful way of looking at the oil business. I think there are (looking at a business activity model) between 300 and a thousand different activities in an oil major all of which are sometimes done by other specialist companies and are at least as relevant as this one. Do we really think adding BP or Exxon to 300 new categories will help anyone using Wikipedia in any way at all? --BozMo talk 09:53, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I only added one category and do not plan to add more in this area.  Your exaggerated fears of a category explosion are just that and not based on any facts.  Hmains (talk) 19:41, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: As well you realise I am sure I was merely illustrating how random and incomplete the approach is. At least randomly pointless is better than systematically pointless I agree.  --BozMo talk 22:12, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  what they are
Template talk:WikiProject Metal

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Support Makes sense to me. JPG-GR (talk) 02:29, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: This template should probably be categorized in . Does anyone object? --B. Wolterding (talk) 17:34, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categorization 

message: I notice that the template is stretched out, and a "|-" seems to be the culprit.  Can this be fixed? --GVOLTT How's my editing?\My contribs 05:16, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I am also seeing the template in the same way, stretched. Cannibaloki 05:35, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Reverted back to last known good version. I'm trying to address the problem that was supposed to be fixed when it got accidentally stretched. Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 16:11, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stretched out template? 

message: Could the sandbox version be copied over. It is just tidying up some of the banner options. Thanks. -- WOSlinker (talk) 22:09, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done, let me know if there are issues. --Stephen 23:57, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit Req 

message: add category "Category:WikiProject Metal".
96.232.126.27 (talk) 23:03, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: For future reference, many templates such as this one, have their documentation on a subpage, which is where the category gets placed. There is an edit link on the template page to access the documentation subpage, and such pages exist as subpages for just the purpose of allowing edits by anyone even where the template itself is protected.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 03:09, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request on 1 January 2013 (add project's category) 

message: There is a Requested move for "Get Rollin'" at Talk:Get_Rollin%27#Requested_move_25_November_2022. --Jax 0677 (talk) 14:21, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move for "Get Rollin'"
Talk:Sick AG

message: On the company's webpage (and in all it's printed material) the company name is "SICK". Why did you change it to "Sick"? Is it som e kind of Wikipedia policy?
Pibben (talk) 12:27, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  SICK or Sick 
Talk:The Guardianship

message: Though I only recognize Shoghi Effendi as having ever been Guardian, I think that it would be prudent to make an article on the Guardianship that is separate from the article about Shoghi Effendi, including the information in the writings of Bahá'u'lláh as well as the Will and Testament of `Abdu'l-Bahá pertaining to the station, requirements, appointment, ratification and successorship of guardians. Information pertaining to claims to guardianship after the passing of Shoghi Effendi could be included, but as most of the information regarding it is already contained within Baha'i Divisions I would like to keep it minimal in accordance with notability guidelines. Peter Deer (talk) 12:34, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I suggest first expanding the articles on Shoghi Effendi and moving that here if it gets too big. The name would probably be "Guardian of the Cause", to follow Hands of the Cause, and I don't think we're supposed to start an article with "the". Cuñado ☼ - Talk 04:40, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps "Bahá'í Guardianship"? And while I agree that articles concerning Shoghi Effendi need expansion, I think that this situation calls for separate articles (similar to "President" and "George Washington" as an example.) Peter Deer (talk) 16:29, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Making this a seperate article
Talk:Coats of arms of U.S. Armor and Cavalry Regiments

message: Note to anonymous Miami University poster:  Since the title of the article contemplates "coats of arms" it seems that it is appropriate to only include coats of arms.  There is a separate "distinctive unit insignia" article to which I have generally moved the distinctive unit insignias that are added to this page.  My goal is to avoid any confusion in the reader, who may not be aware of the difference between coats of arms and distinctive unit insignias.  Certainly, let's discuss any possible better approaches here.  Thanks for all your contributions!Otownfla (talk) 14:33, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coats of arms vs. distinctive unit insignia 

message: this is getting big enough to split. so be prepared. Brian in denver (talk) 16:38, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Armored cavalry regiments are only a sub-set of all cavalry regiments, which doesn't include air cavalry, cavalry (infantry), divisional cavalry squadrons, cavalry squadrons in brigades, and other special units such as the one at West Point. Buckshot06 (talk) 09:51, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: split

message: Why is cav here? They have their own list List of U.S. Army armored cavalry regiments Rklawton (talk) 20:18, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Armored cavalry regiments are only a sub-set of all cavalry regiments, which doesn't include air cavalry, cavalry (infantry), divisional cavalry squadrons, cavalry squadrons in brigades, and other special units such as the one at West Point. Buckshot06 (talk) 09:51, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Cav
Talk:Phenylglyoxylic acid

message: Should it be phenylglyoxalic acid (as currently) or phenylgloxylic acid?  I thought the latter, and Google and Sigma-Aldrich agree (1590 hits for 'phenylglyoxalic acid' vs. 15500 for 'phenylglyoxylic acid').81.129.128.190 (talk) 13:30, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I recommend that you "move" the article to the more common name.--Smokefoot (talk) 03:41, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Name change?
Talk:HTC Touch Dual

message: Please add pricing information on this handset thanks Kushal 03:58, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pricing 

message: The image on this page is huge, much too large. Look at other articles about similar phones. Can we resize it, so that it fits in line with these? Douglas C (talk) 04:29, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 
Talk:20th Massachusetts Infantry Regiment

message: Muster records show that Henry enlisted April, 1864, at Boston. He was injured at the Wilderness the next month and captured, then paroled. He was recorded as born in Germany. We anticipate that he returned to Suffolk Co., MA after the war. Would like to collect any and all information regarding Henry's birth location in Germany. Have not been able to find death information in MA to date. Suggestions accepted.
Bob Epp, in Virginia
703-475-6233 173.72.175.79 (talk) 00:56, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Henry Epp
Talk:Cartographic censorship

message: This article is horrible, someone standardize it.
74.70.57.209 (talk) 13:05, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: BT Tower in London was originally considered "Top Secret".  Though it as completed in 1964, it did not appear on maps until after 1993 when its existence was officially "confirmed".  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BT_Tower  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Falijah (talk • contribs) 13:54, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: BT Tower

message: ...and also apparently just wrong. Censorship is in all cases restriction and not psyops, misdirection, or whatever this article is attempting to talk about. India and others mooting punishment for Google Maps carrying detailed imagery of their defenses is censorship. The US, UK, and USSR promoting false information on certain locations on maps isn't. Any of those countries actively penalizing the provision of true information about those locations would be but isn't how the current article is framed.
There's also an obvious US and Western European bias involved in most of the coverage. Certainly things like the different Chinese empires' traditional policies of considering unauthorized possession of detailed maps de facto evidence of treason is the most textbook example of what cartographic censorship actually is. That it's outside the scope of the current article only speaks to how misdirected the current contents are. — LlywelynII 05:40, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:BIAS]] issues
Talk:Accra Sports Stadium

message: "As the designated venue of some of the 2008 African Cup of Nations matches, the stadium is currently being rebuilt, upgraded and modernised to meet FIFA standards. Work on the stadium has been completed in October 2007."
I'm not sure whether this statement is relevant anymore since the Cup of Nations is now over.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Annatto (talk • contribs) 21:20, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening heading 
Talk:Cuneane

message: A chemist should be brought in to redraw this stuff:  Uniform fonts, back-front perspective, avoid optical illusions.  Or put this crud on the page for M. C. Escher.--Smokefoot (talk) 18:41, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: ... Scheme 1 or Scheme 2? or the both? I like M. C. Escher works, thanks;)--Tim32 (talk) 18:52, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Redraw

message: K. Kindler, K. Lührs looks not really connected to Cuneane.--Stone (talk) 20:01, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I got this reference from March’s Advanced Organic Chemistry, please checkup text of the paper, perhaps, it is wrong reference. Sorry for that.--Tim32 (talk) 14:45, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Ref

message: I think the statement:"Similar reactions are known for homocubane (C9H10) and bishomocubane (C10H10)." should be moved to metal-ion-catalyzed σ-bond rearrangement. What do you think about?--Tim32 (talk) 14:50, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:   Similar reactions
Talk:Victor Mitchell

message: Somebody please take a look at The Service of the Sword.  Is this Victor Mitchell the same or different than the co-author (with John Ringo) of the short story "A Ship Named Francis"?
: ISFDB lists only that one publication for Mitchell and provides no biographical data but
:  is unusually informative concerning co-author (born 1963) --including email and web links.
: Our John Ringo#Published works does not credit any co-author!
: --P64 (talk) 22:26, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Same Person as the Author?

message: I suspect the robot tacked on the speedy deletion notice after I added this language to the beginning:
NOTE:- This person may or may not be the same Victor Mitchell who is the co-author (with John Ringo) of "A Ship Named Francis"...TO BE DETERMINED.
I see nothing wrong with the original page, and I think the programmer of the speedy deletion robot needs to tweak it.  I tried to add the "{hangon}" tag, but I could not find it. 
LP-mn (talk) 23:50, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Robot's going too far. 

message: This entire article reads to me like a promotional puff piece. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:14, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality
Talk:Fritz Kraemer (Waffen-SS)

message: The article has gone between spelling with and without diacritics. But no particular useful sources have been provided for either. Agathoclea (talk) 10:31, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming 

message: This guy is an SS officer according to the article - and no mention is made of regular German army service - is there an explanation for the discrepancy? Is the picture actually of someone else?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.60.38.226 (talk) 17:39, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is he shown in Heer uniform?
Talk:M'el Dowd

message: According to the SAG-AFTRA website's "In Memoriam" section, a "Mel Dowd" died on 9/26/2012. Any idea if it was M'el Dowd? Quis separabit? 01:07, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes.  This says so with the same date (she married Henri G. Eudes). So does this. -- Ssilvers (talk) 16:16, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  Wow. Thanks for the quick work. Quis separabit? 16:05, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Dead?

message: Why was the Chicago category deleted, since she was born in Chicago and raised there until about age 12? Also, I deleted the Iowa project banner, because it is not appropriate here.  This person's notability has nothing to do with Iowa. Her career was in New York City and regional theatres.  Her only connection with Iowa was that she went to school there in her teenage years.  The Chicago project banner was also inappropriate and should not be here. -- Ssilvers (talk) 20:35, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I'll restore both, as you could have done. Quis separabit? 21:33, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi.  I'm saying that the banner should not be here, since neither Chicago nor Iowa has anything to do with the notability of this person. -- Ssilvers (talk) 22:35, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Cats and project banners