Talk:Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung

message: "Its political orientation is classical liberal and conservative (as far as such description still makes sense today)" - the parenthesis should be removed, liberal and conservative politics in Germany have a long tradition. In contrast to the US, liberal and conservative are not opposing each other, instead they both have formed long coalitions, normally against left-winged social democratic and socialistic positions. See the corresponding articles for clarification. --Schoelle 10:14, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed, as nobody objected. --Schoelle 07:36, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think such labelling should not be used in the first place. The best way to describe the FAZ's political line is to list the current seven (and up to 9) shareholders of the FAZIT private foundation, which owns the FAZ. --L.Willms (talk) 17:46, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Classic liberal 

message: The newsstand price of the newspaper is missing.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by OrodesIII (talk • contribs) 02:12, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Price 

message: Does the FAZ have an English version or does anyone offer a translation of it's issues? 
67.161.205.67 (talk) 23:30, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: English Version

message: "Kommt der  Kreationismus aus der Bibel?Von Christian Link
Die wissenschaftlichen Leiter des Bonner Museums Koenig, der großen naturhistorischen Sammlung, baten unlängst den Bochumer Theologen Christian Link um eine Stellungnahme in der Kreationismusdebatte. Wir dokumentieren den Vortrag leicht gekürzt.
--86.218.110.149 (talk) 14:48, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 17.08.2007

message: :Image:Faz logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 20:20, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Faz logo.png

message: The first paragraph of the current version says that the FAZ "is a national left wing German newspaper". The third paragraph says "The newspaper has a slight centre-right or conservative bias". I appreciate that someone might have tried to make two not necessarily contradictory points here, but I don't think that the paper can be left wing and have a centre-right bias at the same time. Could someone with more familiarity with German newspapers and politics please do something about this paradox? Thanks in advance.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.86.223.173 (talk) 20:57, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistent introduction 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090210203724/http://home.online.no:80/~boethius/avis/magnus.htm to http://home.online.no/~boethius/avis/magnus.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:31, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The first two sentences of the paragraph:
"The F.A.Z. promotes an image of making its readers think."
According to whom? And how do they promote this "image"? 
"The truth is stated to be sacred to the F.A.Z., so care is taken to clearly label news reports and comments as such."
Where is the source? Where is it stated? Care is taken, how? 
I think it's better to keep such kind of sentences out. They only confuse the reader, and they only create bias.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.152.161.133 (talk) 10:42, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orientation 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150416100348/https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/Political%20Parallelism%20and%20Media%20Coalitions.pdf to https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/Political%20Parallelism%20and%20Media%20Coalitions.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040313173318/http://www.tu-berlin.de/fb1/AGiW/Cricetus/SOzuC1/SOVsRSR/ArchivSO/FAZ_7_00.htm to http://www.tu-berlin.de/fb1/AGiW/Cricetus/SOzuC1/SOVsRSR/ArchivSO/FAZ_7_00.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041013122135/http://www.ketupa.net/faz.htm to http://www.ketupa.net/faz.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:21, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141219213044/http://www.sv.uio.no/arena/english/research/projects/cidel/old/Reports/702.pdf to http://www.sv.uio.no/arena/english/research/projects/cidel/old/Reports/702.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:20, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The abbreviated name of this paper appears both with and without periods and in both straight and italic type at various points in the article. Which format should we use? --Khajidha (talk) 12:04, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't know, I'm just a reader. It's common to read and speak FAZ, like BBC, but the paper insists on the dots, - in a way we need both, italics when used as a newspaper's name. It has been proposed (today, not by me) to move the article to FAZ (newspaper), which might be a good idea if we go for common international name , , , linguee.de translate. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:33, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: When you say "like BBC" do you mean that the abbreviation is spoken as a string of individual letters? "The paper insists on the dots". I'm not sure how much influence the German language formatting would have on English language formatting. "Italics when used as a newspaper's name". Could you explain what other uses you are contrasting this with? --Khajidha (talk) 13:45, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes to q1, many speak it pronouncing the individaul letters, less fancy people pronounce it one syllable. The paper has/had the dots in it own publications, but now runs faz.net.de. Compare a party with dots, :de:Freie Demokratische Partei, F.D.P. from 1068 to 2001 (which the English article doesn't mention, at least not in the lead). An abbreviation, when introduced, should probably not be italic, - but I confess I never know about italics. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:42, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formatting the abbreviation