lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Self-arrest

message: This article could really use a photo illustrating the relevant technique(s).  75.144.10.113 23:37, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: July 2007

message: I made a number of changes, clearly described in edit summaries, which vastly improved this article.  Now a series of utter morons have taken it upon themselves to revert my work for no reason whatsoever.  I'd ask them to explain themselves here but they have no possible explanation for what they are doing, so I just put this here to note how some people of appallingly limited intellectual ability are here not to build an encyclopaedia but simply to play some kind of bizarre game.  186.9.130.243 (talk) 06:41, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Your edit summaries appear to indicate ownership. Being bold is one thing, but when challenged, you must defer to a consensus. Instead, you've edit-warred and accused people of sockpuppetry (while evading a block yourself). clpo13(talk) 07:29, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: My edit summaries indicate nothing of the sort.  You never bothered to try to find a consensus; you and others simply reverted for no reason other than to provoke and harass.  186.9.132.15 (talk) 07:28, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  and  (that doesn't even mention the edit summaries that have been removed). You often seem to get upset when someone undoes your work. clpo13(talk) 08:36, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

text: Thanks for the protection. It is clear to me we are dealing with Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Best known for IP, who is blocked. WP:EVADE says, "the presumption in ambiguous cases should be to revert.", which is what I did. Burninthruthesky (talk) 08:37, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

text: The block is due to expire on March 11 2018. In the meantime, may I suggest the article is restored to the existing consensus version? Burninthruthesky (talk) 08:50, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: @Karl Dickman. Oh no, you reverted to the version preferred by the sock. More important, there is no reason for permanent protection because there is no any content dispute/disagreements between participants of the project (socks do not count). Making a semi-protecion would be fine, however. My very best wishes (talk) 15:07, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately I did not make clear that protection, like the blocks, would expire after 24 hours. Karl Dickman talk 16:28, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

text: His abusiveness notwithstanding, the version as edited by IP is clearly superior to the one half of Wikipedia reverts to. WP:IAR and all that. To wit, it conforms to WP:REFERS, WP:GENDER, WP:NOTAMANUAL, WP:SELFREF, WP:WEASEL -- if I get the alphabet soup right -- unlike the old one. No such user (talk) 15:35, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, after reading this page and other comments, I suggest to keep current version by the IP and use it for further improvements. I do not think it is "clearly superior", but at least their changes are not unreasonable. My very best wishes (talk) 16:30, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  September 2015
Talk:DirectFB

message: In the text it is said it is for "GNU/Linux/Unix" platforms, and the infobox says "Linux and MacOSX". However, on the website I cannot find any reference to other OS-es (the site is quite confusing though), and it mentions only Linux and Linux framebuffer. Therefore, if someone doesn't know better, it seems to me that every other OS reference should be removed from the article (actually I think GNU can be removed anyway because DFB doesn't really has anything to do with its software layer). Arny (talk) 01:11, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  OS support? 

message: In 2021 there has not been a new release since +6 years. It should be mentioned in the main article
that the project is no longer active, IMO. 2A02:8388:1604:F600:3AD5:47FF:FE18:CC7F (talk) 22:15, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abandoned project
Talk:Columbia Non-neutral Torus

message: The article is pretty neutral, doesn't cover any sort of fringe theory, and is actually well-sourced (although without inline citations). I don't think the  template is appropriate any longer. Can it come off? shotwell 07:59, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's fine with me.  I placed the tag there because one of the creators of the Torus is also cited in the article and is the creator of the article. Sufficient editors have reviewed and edited the article to make any COI moot. Bearian 15:05, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Ok, I removed the tag. I see why you placed it there and it wouldn't have received all the attention if you hadn't noticed the COI. shotwell 23:05, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI tag
Talk:Hsu Hung-chi

message: There are some red-links for some of Hsu's students now in the US. I am going to go ahead and un-wiki-link them. In the case of the footballer, I am going to unlink him as well. The external links at the bottom of the page should be sufficient. If we come back and the red-links reappear, we might start stub articles and see if the articles can stand up to notability requirements. Any thoughts? -- Ben 23:58, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Red-links for US students
Talk:Lily Brayton

message: Can you add dates (just the year, not month or day) next to the list of performances?  Best regards, -- Ssilvers (talk) 13:37, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Need date info
Category talk:Proposed states and union territories of India

message: I think this category is unnecessary . By the way who has "proposed" these new states ?. This category should be scrapped .Shyamsunder 12:11, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

message: Why Bihar is being split into such a tiny piece? The no. of districts in Maithili is 31 while only 7 in Bihar.  This is because even those districts that are not Maithili speaking districts are being included in Maithili as a Maithili speaking areas and being carved out of Bihar.  Let us not rush into splitting Bihar. Let us first correct this error.
My request to the government is that following districts should be included in Bihar as opposed to Maithili because they are not Maithili speaking areas of Bihar:
Sheikhpura – Magahi Speaking Area 
Hajipur – Bojpuri Speaking Area 
Lakhisaria – Magahi also spoken and Angika 
Jamui – Angika Speaking Area 
Banka – Angika Speaking Area 
Mugner – Angika Speaking Area 
Let us first include these districts that are not Maithili speaking areas to Bihar.  This will help Bihar increase little bit in size compared to its neighboring states.  In its current state, Bihar will become very small in size, which is not helpful for Bihar. Bihar will be better off if we add more districts that are not Maithili speaking area yet have been included in Maithili state as a Maithili speaking area. Let the voice of those who care for Bihar reach to the government so that we can stop the injustice from happening to Bihar. 
 Showmeusername (talk) 18:19, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:   More Districts should be included in Bihar
Talk:Baba Balak Nath

message: I was doing my own research in this related article. I will be happy to supply information within en.wikipedia.com's scope.
I will be adding few pictures (which I took). But how to put pictures here?
Thanks.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by AnThRaX Ru (talk • contribs) 04:09, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *If You drop your photos to Wikimedia Commons, then next is easy to get inside article. --Indu (talk) 12:07, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  I think I have enough information in this article. 

message: I have edited the article but there are still some format and grammar problems which I was unable to fix. For example the sentence "Lord Shiva became very happy and blessed Baba Ji to be a Sidha symbol of worship for devotees till Kali Yuga and blessed him child like image to remain for ever." I do not know what this means. 97.116.31.40 (talk) 21:00, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: I am from Jhelum near Tilla Jogiyan, I have been there at the peak of Tilla Jogiyan, It is true there are places of jogi babas, but  I am not agree what you have written regarding jageers of 9 villages, Babas had no Jageers they were jogi who are homeless people nothing to do with worldly life,  and Please note Jhelum and Chakwal and including present Pawalpindi division this whole area belongs to Rajputs since the time of Raja Poro or porus who fought against Alexander, so I means this area always have been the Jageers of Rajputs before Islam and After Islam belongs to Muslims Rajputs Like, Janjua Rajputs, Ghakhars or Kiyani Rajputs, bhatti Rajputs , chip and etc , Only at the time of Sikh period which starts from 1800 to 1835 , only for 35 years when Muslims Rajputs fought against Sikh invaders, there is possibility when Hindu and Sikh joint togather they might hold few villages of dist only for that small period, otherwise there is no such proof that any one else had this Jageers, for ref read Janjua OR jalalpur articles or see Jhelum district article on vikipedia , 
I am from Jhelum, village Bajwala which was known as dattan now know as Bazwala kalan,(This villages started by Raja Baz Janjua actually was know as BAZ WALA. 1730 YEAR  ) only for that 35 years of sikh rule when actually our forefather were on Gorilla war with Sikhs,  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.105.134.127 (talk) 17:11, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  SOME INFORMATION NEEDED TO CORRECT,
Talk:Karuppuswamy

message: Kallar means Black People. "kalavanen kilavi kariyon enba" Kallan means black people.in tamil Kallan means black, king, enemy, karkatakam etc.. Some caste group from south Tamilnadu occupied wikipedia and using it propagate their own ideas. this must stop.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.64.33.228 (talk) 07:06, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Perambalur Dist, Pennakonam, this village is located in the Vellar at south bank, a group of Arunthathiyar i.e., NANDALAN KULAM  were settled here, they were agricultural land lords and they worshiped their "KULADEIVAM" of KARUPULI ANDAVAR, this group of people were migrated to Annamangalam, Aniyampatti, Kengaiveli, Othiathur, Athur, Salem, Thammampatti, Thuraiyur, and near by musiry.  Long back they gone to the above mentioned places, they taken Soil from this place and constructed new karupuli andavar kovils at their near by villages.
     Near by this temple at Kilaikudikadu a kramadeivam sannaiyar temple this also there , there is one the kaval Deivam of Our Karuppuli Andavar, along with 32 kaval deivangal.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.201.133.100 (talk) 15:02, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  KARUPPULI ANDAVAR ( CHINNANDAVAR )  
Talk:Joseph Booth (missionary)

message: ;Essays by Booth
*
::During Booth`s Seventh Day Baptist years. The editor of the Sentinel presents Booth`s account of the native concern for colonial practices. The natives inquire about the sixth and eighth commandments, re: killing and stealing and the behavior of the British soldiers. This type of inquiry illustrates the problem Booth had with European authority over the natives. DonaldRichardSands (talk) 11:48, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Primary Sources for Booth
Talk:Joseph Bowers

message: I recommend that this article be deleted. With due respect to Joe Bowers, he's notable only for being the first man to try and escape from Alcatraz, and that doesn't warrant a separate article. I recommend that it could be deleted.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.144.254.17 (talk) 17:45, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: If you wish to nominate the article for deletion, instructions for doing so may be found at WP:AFD. We do not delete articles by unilaterally blanking them. TimothyJosephWood 15:16, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed deletion 
Talk:Districts of Turkmenistan

message: Nice map! By any chance do you have one where these raions are labelled? I'm doing a world demographic database and I'm on Central Asia.
:That's the hard part. I don't speak Turkmen, and my resources don't have labels. I will try to work with Statoids, as he has a list of the raions there (and can match up with capital city location). I'll keep you informed. Right now I am finishing up 2nd-level for Japan. Rarelibra 12:45, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: The following list of boroughs for Ashgabat is obsolete and has been updated in the main article; I am copying it here for ease of retrieval by researchers:
* Abadan District (formerly Buzmein, Abadan city)Ашхабад прирос новыми территориями
* Archabil District (formed from Archabil, Chandybil and part of Abadan districts)
* Berkararlyk District (formerly Azatlyk, Sovetskiy District)
* Bagtyyarlyk District (formerly President Niyazov, Lenin District)
* Chandybil District 
* Kopetdag District (formerly Proletarskiy District)
* Ruhabad District (formerly part of Ruhabad District, Ahal Province)  
The following list of districts for Balkan Province is obsolete and has been updated in the main article:
** Bereket District (formerly Gazanjyk District) 
** Esenguly District 
** Etrek District (formerly Gyzyletrek District) 
** Magtymguly District (formerly Garrygala District) 
** Serdar District (formerly Gyzylarbat District) 
** Türkmenbaşy District  
The following Ahal Province district has been abolished, and the Ahal list of districts updated:
*Derweze District (formerly part of Ruhabad District)  
Note also that several old names have been restored.  In Ahal, Büzmeýin and Bäherden are back; in Lebap, Kerki is back, and so on.  Please refer to the inline references before trying to restore names that were used for a few years but have now been deprecated.
Dashoguz and Mary were up to date but I brought them into format conformity with the rest of the list.  Amustard (talk) 20:23, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Update of Districts
Talk:Joseph Buttinger

message: This wikipedia entry seems to be plagiarized from the New York Times obituary.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.117.38.202 (talk) 03:00, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Warhammer Fantasy

message: I haven't seen anyone refer to Warhammer Fantasy Battle as just "Warhammer Fantasy". I've seen it referred to as "Warhammer Fanasy Battle", "WFB" or just "Warhammer", but not "Warhammer Fantasy" by itself. And aside from the setting, there is more than one game named "Warhammer Fantasy" - there's also Warhammer Fantasy Roleplay. Ausir 00:37, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I was just talking about my personal experience. Maybe it depends on age and local fandom. Anyway, there's also Warhammer Fantasy Roleplay, which is why I think a disambiguation is better than a redirect. Ausir 19:33, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It feels to me that the setting should be seen as an overarching article about the games.  Accessibility  to the games could be maintained by hatnotes. Taemyr 13:38, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Is this dab really necessary?
Talk:Joseph Clement Coll

message: Astonishing - except that's what everybody did.2A02:AA1:1626:903F:E18C:F6A3:CD00:E14C (talk) 11:48, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  he would draw ... with pencils on tracing paper, after which he would darken the backs of the tracing paper and retrace onto bristol board or illustration board
Talk:Joasaph Bolotov

message: Imported from OrthodoxWiki on 20 July 2007 from this version. -- Petri Krohn 00:44, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: History
Talk:Ronald Tree

message: Nowhere in this article is it explained why "Arthur Field Tree" should have been called "Ronald Tree."  Somehow, I think that an explanation is required.  Are we quite sure that we're talking about the same person?Lolliapaulina51 (talk) 02:29, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: The article says "Tree edited Forum Magazine in New York from 1922." Could this be The Forum? Emeraude (talk) 14:45, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Forum 
Talk:Joseph Dunninger

message: I have just been doing some digging around on old magazine references. Dunninger created the organization Universal Council for Psychic Research, he was also the chairman for this organization but there is no evidence there were any other members. It appears to be his own organization that he set-up to investigate mediums and psychic claims. He offered a reward of $10, 000 to any medium or psychic who could produce phenomena that he could not duplicate or explain by natural means. This was a long standing offer that was never won. HealthyGirl (talk) 04:27, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Universal Council for Psychic Research
Talk:Joseph Fletcher

message: What does 'completing ten books' mean?  If 'writing ten books' is meant, then that's what it should say.  I wouldn't mind knowing what the ten books are.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.122.50.8 (talk) 19:46, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Completing ten books' 

message: Was he really an atheist? I saw that claim recently in a critical review of his thought by a religious conservative, for whom it served the purpose of helping to delegitimize Fletcher's thought. If a sufficient amount of time goes by and no citation is given, I propose removing that statement from the article. However, it might've been true! So I'll look for a source and I hope others will. Wyote (talk) 17:33, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  atheist 
Talk:Philip Callan

message: When was he born, when did he die?
What does the sentence "Mr. Philip Callan was devoted to Butt" mean? Regards, High on a tree 00:58, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have put some more information into the article (with sources in the footnotes). I presume the reference to Butt was to the eventual leader of the Home Rule League (which was the precursor of the Irish Parliamentary Party), Isaac Butt. As the issue arises from a quotation, I have not done anything about it in the article. --Gary J (talk) 16:49, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sokushinbutsu

message: I rememberd seeing it wich QI ep was it?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.104.106.201 (talk) 12:56, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  What epdisode and season was the Sokushinbutsu topic in? 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.thethinkingblog.com/2007/07/self-mummified-monks-of-japan.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:47, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: The introduction says 24 mummies found, the first section, "Shugendō practice", says 100s. I can't access full text of either citation for those statements. Which is correct? Or am I misunderstanding the article?
Fritzophrenic (talk) 04:46, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  How many? Article conflicts itself 

message: The article doesn't say. Hires an editor (talk) 03:50, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why do they do this? 

message: Was this ritual only practiced in Japan, or were Buddhist monks in other countries also practicing this ritual? I understand the practice is illegal in Japan, but would it be legal in other countries? 68.67.243.148 (talk) 03:52, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was this ritual only practiced in Japan? 

message: Should the non-Japanese examples be moved to the Buddhist mummy page, and have this page specifically for the Japanese practice of self-mummification? Amadeus1928 (talk) 01:06, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Non-Japanese examples?
Talk:Michael Benjamin (politician)

message: This article, while informative, seems to read a little more like a promo biography than an encyclopedia article. I suggest either introducing more info so it isn't as much of a list of his achievements, or paring it down to the most important bits and perhaps editing the tone a bit to be more neutral. — Editor at Large(speak) 11:52, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 

message: There are external links, but are these references? If they are they should be mentioned to be such or other references should be found. — Editor at Large(speak) 11:52, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced 
Talk:Kollur Mookambika Temple

message: This article is more about the temple than Sri Mookambika. I suggest that this article be renamed to Mookambika Temple, Kollur
Hari (talk) 11:38, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Done. Mookambika Temple, Kollur. --Gpkp (u • t • c) 06:19, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Renaming this article

message: * Shee Vinayaka Temple, Anegudde (~7 km): The place is known as “ Mukti Stalas”  which means “Place where you can attain Salvation”
* Shree Mookambika Devi Temple, Kollur (~38 km): Details are there in main article.
* Shree Sharadamba Temple (Aadi Shankaracharya Mata/Peeta), Shringeri (~79 km): Jagadguru Shankaracharya Mahasamsthanam, Dakshinamnaya Sri Sharada Peetham, Sringeri. The Peetham is the first and foremost of the four Peethams established by the renowned 8th century philosopher saint Sri Adi Shankara, the principal exponent of Advaita (non-dualism).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.130.40.55 (talk) 15:52, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kundapura Railway Station (KUDA) - Advantage of cover 3 ancient temples
Talk:Otter Creek, Florida

message: This is very much POV and libelous in some ways.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fixitplez65 (talk • contribs) 20:24, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

message: :This is POV. Fixitplez65 (talk) 20:27, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Russell Meeks
Talk:Tupolev Tu-244

message: I found a couple of sources with a brief search that development of this aircraft was ongoing as of 2000/2001. Perhaps these are worth noting in the article since it mentions a potential date for a first flight but also says the project was cancelled outright in 1993. Which source is more noteworthy?--Senor Freebie (talk) 01:41, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: You'll need to provide reliable sources for such claims. - BilCat (talk) 02:45, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Development continuing?
Talk:Raiford, Florida

message: There seems to be some confusing info regarding the names UCI and Florida State Prison. 
: Can someone post a link to the history of the two places, maybe? It might help to understand what is meant when someone served time in "Raiford". Mang (talk) 03:17, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prison section 

message: What's the name of the rail-trail along Florida State Road 121 and the former Jacksonville and Southwestern Railroad line between Northeast 221st Court, roughly around the intersection with Florida State Road 16? No websites are telling me anything. ---------User:DanTD (talk)  13:10, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Raiford Rail Trail
Talk:Mid-Bay Bridge

message: The redirect White Point Bridge has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Randi Moth (talk) 17:57, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:White Point Bridge]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]