lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Liebfraumilch

message: I thought there were 4 rapes allowed for Liebfraumilch.  
Has there been a change in the regulations?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Perfection161 (talk • contribs) 13:47, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I sincerely hope you mistyped and mean 4 grapes, don't you? Jochen64 (talk) 02:56, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  What happened to the mention of kerner grape 

message: To my (native German) sense of language, the term Liebfraumilch sounds weird. The way nouns are composed would rather demand Liebfrauenmilch – likewise, the Church of Our Lady invariably is Frauenkirche and not Fraukirche; a gynaecologist is called a , not Frauarzt. Should the heading be changed, or is liebfraumilch the term preferred in English? (Can't tell myself, as I don't use to consume that kind of beverage.) Jochen64 (talk) 02:56, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Liebfrau vs Liebfrauen
Talk:Assuwa

message: More descriptive name. Categorystuff (talk) 18:59, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Propose renaming page "Assuwa league" 

message: Or is that anachronistic? Or is the answer even known? -Tawaki (talk) 18:50, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Were the people of Wilusa early Phrygians like Euripides claimed?
Talk:Robotic spacecraft

message: Yeah.....I'm not saying I have the ability to do this myself, but then again I wasn't audacious enough to state that I knew the information in the first place...  Where are the dates for the list of probes?  Mercer5089 00:53, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Uh....

message: Should india not be listed on the countries at the beginning? It has now put an object into earth orbit, and if Luna 1 is counted, then surely india should aswell? --Chickenfeed9 20:09, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  india 

message: It seems like the list of notable space probes would make more sense in the space probe article. (sdsds - talk) 16:25, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, just on the merits of the terms.  If we are going to maintain a distinction between space probes and robotic spacecraft, and have two articles in Wikipedia, then it would only make sense to merge this abbreviated list of Space Probes over to the Space probe article.  Furthermore, there are no sources that indicate particular notability for this subset of all space probes.  Appears to be wiki-redundant.  N2e (talk) 14:28, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging space probe list
Talk:DBc

message: This article should be titled "dBc", not "DBc" Greg 14:25, 25 October 2005 (UTC)

message: *I found the article on dBm to be very useful, with some extension the dBc article could be equally useful.
*I would say there is a clear distinction between the unit dBc and the phenomenon of phase noise.
*Given the lack of information in the phase noise article, I would say there isn't even short-term benefit to the merger.DJIndica 22:13, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arguments against proposed merger 

message: "Although the decibel (dB) is permitted for use alongside SI units, the dBc is not.". 
Can someone add a "Instead, use XXXX" suffix?
192.114.175.2 (talk) 15:26, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  SI
Talk:Steve Allen

message: The article should mention his father was Jewish. (Derscht (talk) 18:22, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jewish father 

message: Agreed. Found this: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:r6QaKEF_xCoJ:https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/54932820/elvis-aron-presley&hl=en&gl=au&strip=1&vwsrc=0, which includes "Carroll Abler [Steve Allen's father] was born Carroll Ebler. Ebler is a common Jewish surname."  (Johnb_Roberts (talk) 20:38, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jewish father ditto
Talk:Hippolyte Pixii

message: How did he die? It happened when he was still quite young it would appear. TiHead 13:08, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Some sources claim he invented the dynamo. What is shown in the reference has a rotating permanent magnet. Thus it is a magneto and not a dynamo. Did he ever build a machine with stationary and rotating electromagnets, which would be in fact a dynamo? Edison (talk) 01:01, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Dynamo
Talk:Operation Good Guys

message: This series is very funny, it was released on dvd around July 2005.
:I adored this series. I am now getting it on DVD. Thanks! Chiliflamingo 20:36, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: didnt this lead to The Office and other mockumentary comedies  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.242.81.170 (talk) 02:16, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: influence
Talk:Thomson MO5

message: Hi, I'm Michele Alessandrini (male) from Italy.
I owned an Olivetti Prodest PC128 in the 80's, a microcomputer strictly related to the Thomson MO6.
After having found the emulator I added the link to, I revamped that old glory.
I'd like to see MO5, MO6 and PC128 on Wikipedia, so I started with this little contribution.
I hope it's not a problem to all you people who started this page. I'm new to Wikipedia and I'm starting to learn how to contribute. Tell me if I'm doing unpolite work!
Bye
Michele
* I noticed (thanks to old-computers.com) that MO5NR is quite a different computer than MO5, so screenshots are not appropriate. I will fix this ASAP with the new images I found on old-computers.com --Michele.alessandrini 17:13, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Spring Waltz

message: This article smacks of having original research. There are a lot of subjective comments in here (Especially in Exploring Fantasy of Love, Spring and Island) that need to be weeded out.  The tone in general needs work. Also, the introduction needs to be expanded to include a very brief overview of what the series covers.  The quote at the beginning should probably be removed as well as using it as an intro is not appropriate for an encyclopedic article. --Lendorien 16:44, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Original research?
Talk:Reclaim

message: This article doesn't seem to be of much use, other than finding a way to list off some offensive words. Expand, clean, or nuke it anyone?
--NoMoon 10:44, 30 October 2005 (UTC)

message: Redirecting per the above. - brenneman(t)(c) 06:33, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:Naming conventions (verbs)]]
Talk:Paul Thomas (musician)

message: I think this page should be merged with the good charlotte page cuz it is totally messed up. AND WHAT DO YOU MEAN "I WOULD HATE TO HAVE ANYONE THINK I'M A GOOD CHARLOTTE FAN"?!Good*charlotte*rox 22:49, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: This Paul Thomas shouldn't have the dominant Paul Thomas article since there are two other notable Paul Thomases, including one (the porn star and mainstream actor) who has been active for 35 years. This article should be moved to Paul Thomas (musician). 68.146.41.232 14:53, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article should be renamed
Talk:Blaa

message: Luncheon meat is actually one of the more common fillings for blaas. And one of the most popular types is commonly referred to as Red Lead in Waterford due to its distinct red colour. That edit by User 193.1.57.1 is accurate.
--Jmccormac 10:47, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It may look like that but it does not taste like a bap and it does not have the texture of a bap.--Jmccormac 10:54, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I tried to de-POV it; without any reliable sources, this should probably be a redirect. --John 19:27, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: ″Blaas are sometimes confused with a similar bun known as a bap, however, Blaas are square in shape, softer and doughier, and are most notably identified by the white flour shaken over them before the baking process.″
Trying to highlight the differences between a blaa and a bap, not call them the same thing.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.231.158.157 (talk) 15:37, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The Journal link cited refers to the Blaa as a "Waterford Bap". The title is wrong. It is best to replace it with a citation from something more accurate. Jmccormac (talk) 22:45, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a Bap 
Talk:Show control

message: I've tried to improve the clarity of this subject.  I may be able to further expand on this but want to make sure it is becoming clearer to those not already conversant with the subject. Charlie 15:32, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I've rearranged things a bit, and I think it's a little clearer now to those of us unfamiliar with the subject -- can you check that all the facts are still correct? --Alynna 16:33, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  Looks pretty good to me.  I didn't actually write the initial entry and have a little trouble with the term 'entertainment control' since it really isn't a common term but I don't have a good handle on exactly what term to use generically since things like lighting control, sound control, rigging control, pyro control, etc. are rarely referred to generically.  I think I will make one more little edit....  Charlie 22:16, 25 October 2005 (UTC)

message: This entry is a bit dated.  So-called PC-based systems are no longer confined only to the PC platform, as there are Macintosh-based systems, as well as proprietary systems based on personal computer technology.  As well, embedded systems seem to include too wide a category.  PLCs (which I assume were the original thought behind this category) still belong there, but where does something like an Alcorn-McBride V-16 belong?  Lastly, there are plenty of examples of mixed systems, particularly in theme parks, which use PC-like systems for cuing and embedded systems as interconnected safety systems (for example). Oddjob84 (talk) 19:42, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm done for now.  I will be back.  Oddjob84 (talk) 23:31, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding "Systems"
Talk:Trans Am (band)

message: I can't see as tributes to Krafwerk, Can, etc... can be considered inadvertent: just consider many Trans Am song titles: Cologne, C-Sick, etc... so I removed the adjective.
Carlo.
*Re: Tributes - I don't quite follow your syntax, but I think I agree with you.  Trans Am have never been shy about their influences. Chris77xyz 18:40, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Tributes

message: This article seems to be nearly identical to the All Music Guide entry.
*Re: AMG - I noticed that instantly when I first visited this article, & did my best to undo it. I think the person who added the AMG info just wanted to quickly provide an overview of the band's history, without realizing plagiarism was being committed; I've seen this happen a lot on Wikipedia.  Then again, AMG bios have always been provided as stock information packets at amazon.com, iTunes, insound.com, etc., so it's a pretty common/accepted practice.  AMG is usually trustworthy, but its bio on Trans Am is laughably inaccurate (e.g., the vastly different "post-rock" bands it lumps together), so it was a no-brainer for me to cull it down. I may post one of the live photos I took of the band in '99 sometime, if only to illustrate that they are indeed a "rock" band, not a synthpop conflagration.  Chris77xyz 18:40, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  AMG 

message: The phrase 
 The band started as a side project (Phil also played with Oberlin College friends in "Golden"
is a bit weird, considering that Trans Am PREDATES Golden...how can a band be "started as a side project" when the band listed as the 'main project' didn't exist yet?
CaptainMugford (talk) 03:19, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Someone should fix this...

message: oh come on, it's a badly written article but they aren't any less unknown than a million other bands that have wikipedia articles. they have 5 albums on metacritic, which means they have dozens of published reviews in publications metacritic has deemed worthy enough to include. sure they may not have a new york times piece on them but that's not the standard required of bands, nor should it be
-98.169.111.159 (talk) 08:03, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed deletion

message: "cerebrally robotic, usually instrumental, semi-danceable, minimalistic format"
Does that mean anything?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.196.241.73 (talk) 21:23, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is this?
Talk:Camilo José Cela

message: I have removed the stub tag and the category template indicating that this man was a member of the Spanish nobility, pending some evidence that he actually was.217.158.132.11 15:33, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Answered. --84.20.17.84 12:51, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: This article has been reverted by a bot to  as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) This has been done to remove User:Accotink2's contributions as they have a history of extensive copyright violation and so it is assumed that all of their major contributions are copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. VWBot (talk) 13:14, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 
Talk:Carolyn Murphy

message: IMDb says she was born in 1975 - what's correct? Does anybody know?
xCentaur |  talk   22:49, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  They were removed.... never mind... xCentaur |  talk   23:23, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthday 

message: How typical to look up a Wikipedia page of a well-known living person and discover that their entry does not contain a photo! It's especially pathetic in the case of someone whose career is based on their appearance, as in this case.
Does someone have a non-copyrighted photo they could supply here?
24.255.155.226 (talk) 00:31, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo 
Talk:Scouting in Maine

message: This article looks like it is about a non-notable subject. For images in this article, use the picture tutorial. Also, you might want to create an account because your IP address is used by a recognised vandal. --Gareth Hughes 15:39, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: *why did you merge pamola lodge with this article? Thats just stupid, I hate these articles that are created just so people can dump a bunch of other articles in it. The old articles were fine, and if this article is going to be created, why don't people put worthwhile information in here and not just dump a bunch of other articles in it. Thats my opinion and just so you all now, I am againts further merges. I am not totally against this page, I just think it should be a almost a list like page with links to other articles (such as pamola lodge) and not the end all singular article on everything scouting related in Maine.  --Beefybot 18:17, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Explanation-as per longstanding discussion at the Scouting WikiProject, small articles of less-than-council status are being merged into state articles as per agreement. Our intent is not to delete anyone's work or to minimize the importance of any article that already exists on the Wikipedia.  Instead our goal is to tighten the information, to make it more relevant and useful for the general Wikipedian.  It was agreed that unless an article was large and had contributions from multiple authors, it was not notable enough by itself to meet Wikipedia's standards for a notable subject, and should be merged into the larger state article. If Pamola Lodge had met those criteria, it would not have been merged. Chris 18:53, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: ps-and if you think something is stupid, you've had ample time to comment and to respond to what people have been telling you about your articles. None of these things have happened in a vacuum. Chris 19:01, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: pamola lodge 

message: This article drips with POV and reads like an advertisement.  Can someone please clean this up and make it look like it belongs here? Chris 19:21, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: attention tag

message: I updated the tag changes.  I removed the advert tag; the article is a lot better than when it was added last year.  I added  to the Girl Scouts section; that section is a disgrace when compared to the rest of the article.  GRBerry 13:08, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tag changes 

message: The gallery Neal Manufacturing Company slides is on the commons. Seeing as the company was in Maine, should any mention of it be made? --evrik (talk) 15:21, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Neal Manufacturing Company slides
Talk:US national team

message: Why does this article currently redirect to the US national soccer team?  I think this phrase is too vague to necessarily mean soccer.  I haven't really found a better page yet to redirect to though.  -- Malo 16:07, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I totally agree! /Slarre (talk) 23:40, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's just following common usage for the term "national team" which in most countries refers to soccer, and in many countries the term "men" is not used such as Brazil national football team. On another note, most American teams are referred to as Team USA and not "US National Team" although they are both. Note that the Team USA page is effectively the disambiguation for the term "US National Team." Maybe a disambig note at the top would be helpful, or this term could redirect to "Team USA" but personally I think it's fine the way it is, as this page is redirecting to what most people would be expecting from the term. Starwrath (talk) 15:19, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

text: I went ahead and added a disambig note on the top of United States men's national soccer team. Starwrath (talk) 15:24, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: This redirect
Talk:Transportation in Richmond, Virginia

message: To get this rolling (no pun intended) I am writing with a hierarchy basically of the following:
*Transportation History (all modes)
*Highways and Roads
*Railroads
*Air
*Waterways
 
Once the content is basically in place, we may wish to move section around or rework more, of course. A lot of the history is duplicative of portions of the History of Richmond, Virginia article, but with the focus in this article on just 398 years of transportation history. Including this history makes the following sections a lot more understandable IMHO.  
I am thinking Metro Richmond and including a lot about the portions of the two contiguous counties which are closest to the inner city.
I hope the article isn't deleted before we can even finish it. 
::Mark in Historic Triangle Vaoverland 16:42, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think there's some wikipedia standard like.. WP:redundancy where it says it's ok to have some redundant content between articles. I think we maybe should have some subsection on ground transportation that involves GRTC, LINK buses, Groome transportation, independent  taxi services, and speculation of having downtown trolleys. You need to ensure the intro paragraph scopes this article as far as area covered (Richmond-Petersburg versus RVA-Chesterfield-Henrico only) and the article's subdivisions as we are discussing here. btw, the vote is 7 to 2 so I am not worried at this point if it'll get deleted. you may want to save a copy on your hard drive just in case, though. MPS 18:11, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: General plan
Talk:List of rivers of Pennsylvania

message: 'Paper Mill Run' is better known as Monoshone Creek by those who live here.  Current information about the Monoshone Creek and other Philadelphia stream can be had by contacting the Philadelphia Watershed Alliance.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.114.108.145 (talk) 05:05, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

message: The List of Pennsylvania streams page was created because streams not named rivers were being deleted from List of Pennsylvania rivers.  Perhaps there should be discussion, and policy, on whether streams not named rivers should be listed in lists of rivers.  Gjs238 12:42, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you need to handle the "East Branches and West Forks" on a case by case basis.  The West Branch Susquehanna, for instance, has its own article.--J Clear 01:50, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to merge [[List of Pennsylvania streams]] into this page 

message: Hi, I see you moved List of Pennsylvania rivers to List of rivers in Pennsylvania. However, you did not move the associated talk page (which is still at Talk: List of Pennsylvania rivers, Talk:List of rivers in Pennsylvania is blank). Nor did you go through and fix all the pages that now link to a redirect (see []). 
For the time being, I am moving the page back to its old name. Would you please mind explaining a) your rationale for the move and b) why you didn't fix all the changes the move made? I think you should do this at the talk page. I will leave a copy of this note there too. Thanks, Ruhrfisch 17:29, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This should be moved to List of rivers in Pennsylvania to keep with name uniformity. I am willing to move this article and its talk page. It seems ridiculous to go to every article which links to the page and change it though. There is nothing wrong with redirects so long as they don't go more than one level deep. That why we have redirects. --Analogdemon (talk) 17:47, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: All I ask is that when you move a page you move the associated talk page, and check for and fix double redirects (which are then broken links, losing connectivity). Thanks for providing your rationale for the move. Ruhrfisch 17:53, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Alright, I'll move the page, talk page and check for double-redirects. Thanks! --Analogdemon (talk) 18:02, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Message originally left on [[User:Analogdemon]]'s talk page regarding moving this page 

message: I am working on articles for all tributaries of the Delaware River in Bucks County, so, I added them to this list without links and will add links as the articles go live. I compiled this list from Google Maps and listed them at my talk page. If this doesn't make sense, I can fix it.Are1718 (talk) 02:43, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Bucks County Tributaries
Talk:Sai Tso Wan, Tsing Yi

message: Is there another Sai Tso Wan near Lam Tin and Cha Kwo Ling? — Instantnood 16:49, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, also there is one in Lantau Tau near Sham Wat.HenryLi 01:21, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Should this page be moved to Sai Tso Wan, Tsing Yi, and be converted into a disambiguation to Sai Tso Wan, Tsing Yi, Sai Tso Wan, Kwun Tong District and Sai Tso Wan, Lantau then? :-) — Instantnood 06:00, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mill

message: In Ireland, there are a number of shops still called "Woollen mill", but (not being a native) I am not sure if that is a brand name, or whether it is also used as a generic term (like Cotton Mill). Maybe someone can clarify & add (or not). Deadstar 09:03, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Woollen mill

message: What about the common phrase rumor mill? BlankVerse 06:16, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  rumor mill? 

message: A soil mill isn't described, this is a device to till the soil  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.64.58.98 (talk) 10:06, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Soil mill

message: Rich Farmbrough, 03:18, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: In Our Time

message: ))) 
P.S. "И оборвалась бы жизнь с незаконченным средним образованием .. ;) .. 176.59.208.72 (talk) 02:11, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mill by cuting circle ..