lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Lacrosse at the 1908 Summer Olympics

message: I have seen mention in newspapers articles from 1908 that said South Africa had intended to send a team but then withdrew Davidjsc (talk) 10:18, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Weren't gold medals also given in the 1904 olympics ? Maxime12346 (talk) 18:57, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "the only lacrosse medals gold medals given out in the Olympics Games"
Talk:Kendall Hart

message: Sarah Michelle Gellar's 2011, per the soap itself and multiple sources, was not as Kendall. It was as a patient with a problematic mental state of mind, believing herself to not only be Erica Kane's daughter, but also someone who saw vampires "before they were trendy." This is all stated and sourced within the article itself. livelikemusic (TALK!) 18:15, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gellar's 2011 return
Talk:Ross Winn

message: Recently, Ross Winn's birthplace was changed from 'Texas' to 'Dallas, Texas' and cited to the article Ross Winn in the Anarchist Universe. Unfortunately, that article doesn't mention anything about Winn's birth or Texas. Although we know that Winn lived in Dallas during part of his life, I haven't been able to find any evidence that he was born there. For now, we should change his birthplace back to just 'Texas' per the verifiability policy. Kaldari (talk) 21:38, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthplace 
Talk:Clark Aldrich

message: This article was proposed for deletion. I have removed it given that a Google News Archive search comes up with a number of articles which indicate notability. 
I really like Wikipedia and think that it is growing in value month-by-month, year-by-year, but I really don't understand decisions like this - I mean, surely someone who is a published author deserves an entry here. Why can't that be taken as a ruling? (by bcgstanley)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bcgstanley (talk • contribs) 12:23, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed prod

message: I removed them for 2 reasons. 1. Wikiquote is for quotes and 2. WP:BLP requires that "All quotations...must be explicitly attributed to a reliable, published source, which is usually done with an inline citation." Sean.hoyland - talk 17:47, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Quotes

message: The subject of this article has gained a reputation for trying to hide certain facts of his life through manipulation of online sources. This includes the use of sockpuppet accounts and "friends" to continue false allegations in online discussions.
Repeated edits and reversions of this article without coherent reason or support strongly indicate a lack of neutrality on the part of those individuals. The most egregious behavior is by one particular editor, Intrepid French Learner. The handle "Intrepid French Learner" is the that of a former frequent (and obsequious) commenter on the website run by " Clark Aldrich" and wife. While the "Aldriches" have removed commenting from their site, the comment history of this individual handle can be found in archived content. This individual is biased, and a longtime admirer of the "Aldriches," and hence not a neutral voice for editing.
Wikipedia has rules for editors, and those who wish to edit are expected to abide by them. This is clearly not the case with this particular editor up to this point. 
Due to the repeated and unjustified removal of information from the site by biased individuals this neutrality tag is justified. Do not remove the tag.
--Elliotspitzerforever (talk) 11:24, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed your tag as I don't feel it's appropriate to the article - which points in particular do you have problems with? RE: The edits of the above editor, they have been reverted almost without exception due to them not being supported by reliable sources. Cheers, Nikthestunned 12:21, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

text: Your feelings about the tag are irrelevant. This talk page amply demonstrates that the neutrality of the article is widely disputed. This is a very clear case. Please stop being a disruptive editor.  Elliotspitzerforever (talk) 17:54, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The article as it stands is well sourced and seems to include all the information available in reliable sources. Can you show which parts are not properly cited or unbalanced and provide sources to support these claims? Here is the policy regarding reliable souces, please read it and understand it before re-adding inappropriate sources to the article. Nikthestunned 19:35, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality is disputed
Talk:Boston Blazers (1992–1997)

message: I propose that this article be renamed to "Boston Blazers (1992-1997)" or perhaps "Boston Blazers (MILL)", and the new Boston Blazers (NLL) article be renamed as simply "Boston Blazers". The number of people searching for this article will be much less than those searching for the existing team. I will do this in a couple of days if I don't hear any compelling reason not to. --MrBoo (talk, contribs) 14:25, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renaming article 
Talk:Buffalo Bandits

message: I have started a discussion over at Talk:List of current NLL team rosters which discussed the roster used on this page.  If you are interested, please let me know what you think.   Mitico (talk) 17:21, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Uniformity of rosters

message: Whatever happened to the page's template?!  Without it, the page looks blank.  Furthermore, if the dead link is the Bandits' homepage, then I opend it just a few minutes ago.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.7.239.20 (talk) 02:31, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bandits Template 
Talk:Rochester Knighthawks (1995–2019)

message: "Junior" is not shouted out after John Grant is announced.  Also several other calls are shouted by different groups.  Some of the Knighthawks Krew shout out when Steve Toll scores, "Whose house?  Toll House!", especially when facing Buffalo (in response to the chant in their "barn": Whose House?  Steenhuis! (pronounced Stein-house)).  But not by all.  Paploo 17:49, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fan traditions
Template talk:British Shipbuilders evolution

message: Ok this template really needs work you can't even read it. Whispering(talk/c) 17:47, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If you open up the image there isn't a problem. Granted it isn't perfect though, but it's far too complicated to represent as an html table with links, which is what I originally tried. I'm going to try doing it as an SVG when I can figure out how. Emoscopes Talk 17:58, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorted now :) Emoscopes Talk 15:58, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know it's still kind of bright for a encyclopedia have you taken a look at :Template:Modern North American Ford trucks I think the various car templates are very well done. Whispering 16:29, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, I'll look into muting the colours soon, would allow me to get rid of the white-backgrounding anyway. Emoscopes Talk 16:37, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: How about now? :o) Emoscopes Talk 18:42, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks nice, but the font is a bit small. I think 80% should be the lowest font-size used, as long as it doesn't stretch the smaller cells too badly. Also, the vertical padding could be condensed so the template isn't more than a screen tall. –Pomte 04:39, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is currently set at 75%, with some tagged  to prevent it wrapping the text. My thinking was anyone having problems could always zoom the text on their browser. I investigated reducing the vertical padding but I wasn't really sure how to go about this, if you could fix this yourself, I would encourage you to go ahead and do it, as 2 of us have been unable to find a suitable solution. Emoscopes Talk 08:23, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Erm??? 

message: I guess I should leave a hint for the next guy who comes here and wonders about me reverting so many edits. The point is, those edits resulted in a blank page, at least on my notebook (1024 resolution, Win2k, Fire3fox3.5). Imho the template should be viewable for all users. If you want to reapply those edits, pls do it in a way that doesn't ruin the template for users who can only use lower resultions. Gray62 (talk) 11:48, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Last edits resulted in blank page!

message: I just reverted the unexplained removal from the British Shipbuilders page of this really helpful table that SKS spent a lot of time on a decade ago.  Apparently there is a problem of its visibility on some mobile platforms.  That may indeed be so, and hopefully someone will be able to advise on how to approach that technically.  In my view this template, subject to some amendments is, just about the only way to present this complicated story with any clarity.
However, a new, and odd, problem is that when I amended the template just now the revised version appears on its own page, but only the previous version will, at least for me, open on the British Shipbuilders page.  Help needed!! Davidships (talk) 19:26, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template needs tech help! 

message: Is there a pre-1960 version of this anywhere? GBev1987 (talk) 11:25, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pre-1960?
Talk:Hostiles

message: I will improve this page over the coming week, so don't delete the article please Maestr06 20:44, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There is already an article about the "Hostiles" here: The Others (Lost). There is no need for this article you created. But you can always contribute additional information to the "The Others (Lost)" article. Your article is nominated for deletion for this reason. See the discussion here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hostiles.--Bisco 23:10, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improving Page
Talk:2004 Major League Lacrosse season

message: I rolled back the changes because it created alot of red links that probably would never be filled and changed the structure of page so as not to match the other mll seasons. Smith03 (talk) 16:44, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: rollback on Aug 2009
Talk:Lisa Cuddy

message: The behind-the-scenes reason for the characters exit is missing.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.236.174.11 (talk) 10:08, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lacking info of her leaving
Talk:Claudia Lars

message: I'm not sure what this sentence means: "However, before getting married, endured a hectic life in which she worked packing peaches in the United States, translating stories for Walt Disney and Salvadorans working together to anti-fascist newspapers."  Does it mean she translated stories for Walt Disney and also translated stories for anti-fascist newspapers in El Salvador? Or was Walt Disney somehow connected to the newspapers? Or some other meaning? Cloveapple (talk) 14:58, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unclear sentence
Talk:Claudia Tienan

message: I am the original author of this article. At the time, there were few written sources about her music career. There are still not many. However, as a musician linked to an established rock performer, and as someone whose own work has been noted in New York for years, I considered her to be "notable" enough, and still do. She is not some nameless garage-band hobbyist from an unknown small town, and the article contains nothing potentially libelous or commercial. If you do delete my article, it would be a strike against an independent musician. Considering the nature of the Wikipedia and that of the Internet in general, that would be sadly ironic.Illusi0nist (talk) 00:20, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Urmston

message: We've got a mishmash of last acceessdates in this article now, some 4 May 2009 and others 2009-05-04. The latter seems to have become the preferred format for accessdates ("Unlinked ISO 8601 format is preferred"). Any objections to standardising on that? --Malleus Fatuorum 17:13, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I was just about to start standardising things within the article in preparation for starting a "towns of Trafford" Featured Topic. Nev1 (talk) 17:17, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't remember the rules for Featured Topics, and I'm feeling too lazy to look them up. Are there enough FA/GAs now for that? --Malleus Fatuorum 17:35, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, with four of the six articles in the topic at FA (Trafford would be the title article) we're well over the 33% minimum proportion of FAs. My suggestion of "Trafford" as a topic was just too broad and too much work (the cricket and football grounds need work amongst others) so your original suggestion of towns in Trafford makes a lot of sense. Nev1 (talk) 17:54, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last accessdates
Talk:Popular Revolutionary Front for the Liberation of Palestine

message: PFLP was always recognised as a terrorist organizations -  : all factions and divisions of it, separatists and so on, were made clear by U.S they're still terrorist organizations in their eyes unless they renounce the violence option, which they didn't. anyway, even if you don't accept that (they were on lists, but assume they're weren't) since the people forming this fanction previously were in PFLP themselves, the former category stands anyway for this organization which rooted itself from a designated terrorist organization.Amoruso 17:52, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The logic of guilt by association does not function. Either you provide a source that says that US listed the group as a terrorist organization or you stop adding the category. Do we even have a source clarifying that there was a systematic designation by the US of terrorist groups in the early 1970s? The link you provided deals only with the EU list, a post-11/9 construct. Prior to 2001 PFLP was not designated as a terrorist organisation by the EU/EEC. --Soman 09:57, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: They were regarded as a terrorist organization, and if you want we can just create former terorrist if you think designated is not a good word here. It doesn't even matter, don't know if you're trying to whitewash it or something, plain weird. Whatever. Amoruso 17:35, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The category 'Designated terrorist organizations' was created as an alternative to the category 'Terrorist organizations' to get away from the obvious POV problems involved with that category. The very point of 'Designated terrorist organizations' is that it can be clearly sourced who designates a group as terrorist, rather than arbitrary judgements. --Soman 08:15, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article is clearly in the beginning stages of writing but does a good job in the opening paragraph about the division that formed the PRFLP. Though understanding that information is most likely limited for this group, There are some missing sections of information that need to be added to help readers better understand the group. There is explanation of why this group split from the original group but there needs to be a section of their particular ideology and why the PRFLP is a group. Depending on information availability, there should be a section on any type of involvement in a conflict or attack. Maybe something interesting to look more into is whether the group left any reminiscence to lead to the creation of another group or influenced any other group to formulate. The final suggestion would be to include a brief history of the conflict for which this group and other groups are fighting over so the reader understands why they were created. TheBasher55 (talk) 15:08, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer Review (4/13)
Talk:Habis Majali

message: This article is nothing but a glowing, triumphalistic eulogy to Mr Habis al-Majali. It makes countless claims which are not sustained by any references! I have included a few "citation needed" tags but it is not enough. I feel the whole article has to be re-written - or at least heavily edited - in order to present a more balance view.
Since I do not have time to undertake such a project it should at least be labelled as a disputed article..
For example the attempted Syrian invasion of Jordan in September 1970 (in the sub-section "In the Stability of Jordan) was not repulsed by Majalis himself but by the Israeli air-force which threatened the Syrians (although it did not actually bomb them) and forced them to withdraw. 
This happened during a civil war, by the way, so Majalis was not "crushing a revolt" and the Palestinian were subsequently massacred in what became known as Black September. All these facts are omitted from the article.
Avel2 18:04, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Boston Cannons

message: Boston Cannon's roster is outdated. I am changing it to the current roster (2009).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.2.188.211 (talk) 23:27, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The logo posted here is incorrect, see the new logo (in use for a few years) here:
http://www.bostoncannons.com/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 153.2.247.32 (talk) 14:19, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo for Boston Cannons 

message: Functionally these are different teams, they were in different leagues, when they joined the PLL they received a new roster, and while it can absolutely be argued that they're the same organization since they kept the history, I'm unsure if that really matters so much when they switched leagues and didn't even keep the same roster. Jsfxmn (talk) 01:25, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: As someone who covers the league professionally, I would recommend these pages remain together. While a new roster was allocated, these franchises are functionally the same thanks to the PLL and MLL's merger. The PLL specifically used the language of absorbing the Cannons franchise into the PLL when that merger was completed. The PLL retains the MLL's history, and the Cannons retain their previous history. As noted on their socials and website, the Cannons franchise boasts the MLL team's championships, and the establish date of 2001 is in their branding. Like the Denver Outlaws, I consider it like the Cleveland Browns returning to the NFL with its history intact. 134.48.109.82 (talk) 14:49, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  KEEP This is always a sticky issue. Are they the same corporation- no. But is the Cleveland Browns and Charlotte Hornets can both take the history of their teams (especially Charlotte), then these two should be in the same article. I think it just needs to be made VERY CLEAR the difference between the MLL years and PLL years. (Bes2224 (talk) 00:23, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split page into Boston Cannons (MLL) and Boston Cannons (PLL)?
Talk:New York Lizards

message: Anyone know what instigated/why they changed their name? Long Island Lizards sounds so much better as a marketing name to me. Just curious if anyone can contribute more info. 15:20, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Name Change?

message: When the seaon ended I sent an email to mll asking about 3-5 in the east I finally got a response today:
They (NJ, LI, ROC) would be decided first by overall record but they were
all 5-7.  Then by head-to-head record among all tied teams, but each team
was 1-1 against each other.  Then by overall conference record - NJ was
5-5 against the East, and ROC/LI were 4-6, so NJ becomes the "best" of
those Teams and the #3 team in the East.  The tie-breakers then re-apply
to just ROC & LI, so they are both 5-7, both 1-1 against each other, both
4-6 in the east, so the next tiebreaker is total points scored margin in
their games against each other.  LI won 19-7 and ROC won 15-13, so LI is
the "better" of those teams because they were +10 and so LI becomes the #4
team, ROC is #5 and BAL was #6 because they had the worst record in the
conf.
So I made a correction on the standings 
Smith03 22:13, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 2006 East standings for NJ/LI/Roch

message: Added a sentence or two about the team's name, which is based on an unusual lizard that has become native to Long Island. Alexandermoir (talk) 02:24, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inspiration for team name and logo 
Talk:Los Angeles Riptide

message: "Notable ESPN blogger and former Ohio State defender Greg "Bicecreamman" Bice led the team with 3 blog entries for the 2005-2006 season. Another Buckeye on the squad is Lorenzo Lamas look-a-like Anthony "A-train" Kelly."
What is this?  Mitico 01:15, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Franchise History
Talk:New Jersey Pride

message: When the seaon ended I sent an email to mll asking about 3-5 in the east I finally got a response today:
They (NJ, LI, ROC) would be decided first by overall record but they were
all 5-7.  Then by head-to-head record among all tied teams, but each team
was 1-1 against each other.  Then by overall conference record - NJ was
5-5 against the East, and ROC/LI were 4-6, so NJ becomes the "best" of
those Teams and the #3 team in the East.  The tie-breakers then re-apply
to just ROC & LI, so they are both 5-7, both 1-1 against each other, both
4-6 in the east, so the next tiebreaker is total points scored margin in
their games against each other.  LI won 19-7 and ROC won 15-13, so LI is
the "better" of those teams because they were +10 and so LI becomes the #4
team, ROC is #5 and BAL was #6 because they had the worst record in the
conf.
So I made a correction on the standings 
Smith03 22:09, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 2006 East standings for NJ/LI/Roch
Talk:Common krait

message: Someone is going to need to decide whether this article is to have a "Behavior" section or a "Behaviour" section; it shouldn't have both!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.229.52.162 (talk) 03:06, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This whole section needs to be sorted out by someone who actually knows something about the snake.
One sentence implies that the snake coils up in the daytime and can be easily handled, whereas another suggests that the coiling is done when the snake is agitated, which suggests to me that it wouldn't be a good time to try handling it.
Also, how on earth can it escape by hissing?Glevum (talk) 05:14, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Behaviour 

message: Ajay Singh gurjar is an Indian animation video maker on YouTube 106.215.93.101 (talk) 03:29, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  SPREADING ANIMATION 

message: Nnn 103.180.73.73 (talk) 01:14, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hshsh
Talk:Clifford Durr

message: I retrieved the original text, which was branded as copyvio after the Montgomery Advertiser borrowed the wikipedia article without attribution. I eliminated the reference to 
:by Hollinger F. Barnard and Studs Terkel
in the citation to Virginia Durr's autobiography; Barnard edited it and Terkel contributed a foreword. 
As the wealth of sources indicates, this article could use some further work. It is not, however a stub any longer. Italo Svevo 03:45, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Hello, there is an article here, http://www.encyclopediaofalabama.org/face/Article.jsp?id=h-1254, that might be useful as an external link or as additional information. Thanks, Justin --Duboiju (talk) 16:33, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional Information

message: Hello, I have posted 4 photos of Clifford Durr here http://picasaweb.google.com/cliff.lyon/CliffordDurr# and upload one of the here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Clifford.Durr.I.jpg 
I am his grandson.  These are scanned versions of pictures that are in my Mother's collection and they have been given to the University of Alamaba.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ffilcnoyl (talk • contribs) 16:16, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos of Clifford Durr 

message: Contemporary issues of Broadcasting always refer to him as C. J. Durr or Clifford J. Durr.  But one of the references here says Clifford B. Durr.  Which is right?  121a0012 (talk) 02:23, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Middle initial 