lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Parkwood, Queensland

message: The coordinates place it in Victoria, clearly incorrect.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.181.23.119 (talk) 02:01, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

message: This article is a little odd compared to similar articles.  Half of it could be removed because it mentions things not found in Parkwood but close-by.  Sentences such as "Parkwood is near" or such as such is close-by aren't useful. - Shiftchange (talk) 05:58, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oddity
Talk:Black Moon

message: @ < http://akas.imdb.com/title/tt0072709 >, it is claimed to have been advertized as: "An  apocalyptic   Alice in Wonderland!"
Thank You,
 hopiakuta  Please do  sign  your  signature  on your  message.  %7e%7e   Thank You. - 11:55, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[ Black_Moon_%28film%29 ]]
Talk:The Ambidextrous Universe

message: This sounds interesting but the explanation needs some amplification and clarification. Couldn't quite follow the set-up. Also the parity experiment needs additions and elaboration to provide better idea of what the research was about and how it connects with the problem referred to.68.178.50.46 (talk) 00:24, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I tried to clarify a few days ago. I added a link to Wu experiment which explains everything about that. I would not transfer alot about it from the dedicated article to this one as anyone wanting additional information can just look there. 143.85.18.26 (talk) 19:48, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ozma Problem
Talk:The Bear Went Over the Mountain (novel)

message: How did Jim Henson buy the movie rights when he'd been dead for six years before the book came out?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.166.2.237 (talk) 19:07, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jim Henson?
Talk:Libertad, Antique

message: Tono ng pananalita ng taga libertad 158.62.49.197 (talk) 14:51, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Libertad
Talk:San Jose de Buenavista

message: Montykillies (talk) 18:36, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 20:19, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem 

message: Should the infobox for San Jose be removed? I seem to be the only one who had noticed that the infobox for Patnongon had been removed so I was wondering if I can ask here for approval for it to be removed before I just go and remove it myself. 2600:1700:3860:CD80:7D15:D3A2:27CD:C7DF (talk) 23:56, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox removal
Talk:Sibalom

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources.  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  John of Reading (talk) 09:48, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Three large sections were added in this edit. Two gave their source, one did not. It seems very likely that all three are copyright violations. -- John of Reading (talk) 09:48, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:West Ardsley

message: West Ardsley made the national news in 2001 when a Real IRA bomb factory was discovered there. Guardian link: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2001/nov/17/northernireland.martinwainwright. Mglovesfun (talk) 12:57, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Real IRA bomb factory 
Talk:Gert Fram

message: I have removed the notable? template from the article. My reasoning: this is the first published story from a person who later became internationally famous. Thus, although the story itself may not be "notable", its notability is established due to its placement in the author's career.  I hope all agree with this action.--Spray787 (talk) 13:49, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Dub

message: I'd prefer to get the opinions of registered users (sorry 132.205.99.122), and experienced editors. Victor is right when he says that Dub music isn't obscure just because you haven't heard of it.  Please consider the way it is currently being used both within Wikipedia and in the world at large.  Remember, too, the purpose of dab pages is to help users find the article they are looking for.  What is a user looking for when they type in "dub"? Are they more likely to be looking for an article on the music genre or the audio technique?  I'm not assuming an answer, I'm just asking the question that needs to be asked. There are far more links to Dub that relate to Dub music than any other usage, and I think that is one indication of primary meaning. SlackerMom 19:05, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia hasn't banned anonymous users yet. As for incoming links, that can easily be attributed to a selection effect. dub music would have alot of articles due to performers of dub music having articles. The audio technique would not have so many articles, as most would be technical articles, and there would only be so many of those. This also applies to ghits. 19:28, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Very true.  I realize the number of hits is not the only consideration, I just think it shouldn't be ignored, and it opens the door to further discussion about how this word is currently being used.  (Anonymous users are certainly not banned, but I must admit to a certain predjudice against their contributions, based on general observation. I apologize if you took offense and appreciate your responsibly-expressed opinions.) SlackerMom 21:15, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Template talk:Major Physics Research Facilities based in the United Kingdom

message: Having red links within a template is plain odd - unless there are objections, I shall be removing them in 24 hours. TheIslander 12:35, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Red Links

message: Shouldn't this be entitled "Major Physics Research Facilities based in the United Kingdom", since it only covers physics research facilities? --Pontificalibus (talk) 16:37, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Physics
Talk:Powązki Cemetery

message: This article is, in its main part, about the Military Cemetery on the Powązkowska street, near the Powązki Cemetery. The Military Cementery is often mistaken as the Powązki Cemetery.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lichotto (talk • contribs) 19:25, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misunderstood 

message: Many people mentioned in the list  are actutally buried on one of the Protestant cemeteries, not on Powazki. The Military Cemetery is never called "Powazki Cemetery". A need of a new article about Powazki (Catholic) arises. This one is misguiding. --Alexvonf (talk) 09:46, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Lots of mistakes

message: I have split the article and created another one specifically about the military cemetery. The list of notable burials should be however double-checked and military burials removed. - Darwinek (talk) 22:23, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: re: Notables list:
Surely this name trumps relatives of Chopin !
See WP article if in doubt or simple ignorance.
142.162.22.21 (talk) 13:02, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zbigniew Herbert, poet 
Talk:Obergurgl

message: Whilst on holiday, I heard that it was actually the highest parish in Europe. I'll see if I can find some proof first though. TheTrojanHought 12:42, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Highest Parish

message: This article was originally in American spelling and should be left that way. The original spelling variant takes precedence. See Wikipedia:Manual of Style#National varieties of English. —Stephen (talk) 02:11, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: National spellings
Talk:Clifford, West Yorkshire

message: I have moved the class up from Stub to Start, any objection? Mtaylor848 (talk) 11:12, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Petalesharo

message: This sounds like a romanticized western myth that has little to do with actual fact. There is very low likelihood that anyone from the Comanche nation ever came to Nebraska, let alone participated in the action attributed here. Need a clear inline citation at least. • Freechild'sup? 12:46, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The girl was captured by a special war group and brought home to the Pawnee village in present-day Nebraska. Sources about how the action circulated to the newspapers are given now.Naawada2016 (talk) 10:36, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Comanche girl

message: " In 1833, Petalesharo, with the help of an Indian agent, attempted to rescue a young Cheyenne girl who had been taken in a raid. During his effort, Skidi Pawnee shot and killed the girl with arrows as she was being lifted onto a horse.
The last historic reference to Petalesharo is in 1825, when he and his father signed a treaty at Fort Atkinson, on the west bank of the Missouri River. Petalesharo is believed to have died in 1832 and been buried in Nebraska."  1833 is after 1832 and 1825.202.126.91.139 (talk) 05:27, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Right. After that, a few comments: It seems the 1833 rite did not take place at all, but is a sad case "of Historical Mythology". The attempt to rescue a Cheyenne girl took place in 1827 and is well documented. Petalesharo is not mentioned in the documents in relation to the 1827 event and his name is deleted now. The 1827 event is mentioned here, nevertheless, as an example of a well documented attempt to rescue a girl and with real help from a Pawnee fraction against the Morning Star rite. If such an attempt took place in 1827, why not in 1817, too? I can not give any source for the assumed death of Petalesharo c. 1836, so it may still be disputed with good reason.Naawada2016 (talk) 10:36, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Living dead?
Talk:Collingham, West Yorkshire

message: Some updating is required because the empty pub is now a Tesco Local, and the bathroom showroom has closed86.140.154.82 (talk) 14:52, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amenities 

message: Some updating is required because the empty pub is now a Tesco Local, and the bathroom showroom has closed86.140.154.82 (talk) 14:53, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amenities 
Talk:Jack Chevigny

message: Currently, I am engaging in an edit war with YahwehSaves (Talk|Contribs) and their sock puppet 75.79.31.20 (Talk|Contribs) (which is a common occurrence for their disruptive edits, see their contributions page), for their attempts to add unreferenced and uncited information. One issue is the Combat Action Ribbon, which wasn't awarded until 1969. YahwehSaves continues to add this information, among other unreferenced information, to the page, where I promptly revert the edit & invite them to discuss such edits here at the talk page. It is not my intention to keep factual information from being on this page, but I'm unable to find any references to Jack Chevigny being retroactively awarded the CAR. As such, the edits made by YahwehSaves & 75.79.31.20 will be continue to be reverted if unreferenced.Bullmoosebell (talk) 02:22, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disruptive Edits 

message: Why is the lettering in the information box so small (miniature)? Other persons boxes have larger sized lettering in their boxes than his.YahwehSaves (talk) 08:35, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Info box lettering
Talk:Acquisition and Cross-Servicing Agreement

message: This article focuses solely on the US's use of ACSA and makes it appear as if ACSA's are solely used by the US with other countries.
However, some quick internet searches reveal the existence of several bilateral ACSA's without the US, for example:
* The diplomat article on Japan - Australia ACSA
* Australian government announcement on Japan - Australia ACSA
* Article on Japan - India ACSA negotiation
* Article on Japan - SK relations, mentions ACSA unlikely to occur between them
* Article on Japan - France ACSA
While that list somehow ended up having a strong Japan focus, the point is clear - countries routinely form bilateral ACSA agreements that do not involve the US.
Thus, this article is greatly inaccurate and does not give a correct description of current ACSA usage, and likely needs a large overhaul. This would probably look like:
# Rewriting introduction to be country-agnostic, focusing on description of generic ACSA's
# Expanding the history section to include significant ACSA's, both with and without the US
# Potentially creating a new section for US ACSA's, and maybe another section for non-US ACSA's - depends if there is enough content to warrant these sections, and if the amount of ACSA's that warrant mentioning makes the existence of such sections worthwhile (If not, content that would go here would likely just go in the history section).
# Adding more external links to more ACSA's examples
Tomiam8 (talk) 02:40, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove US focus
Talk:Interim Committee

message: no links or discussion of  opinions contrary to this are listed - top generals oppsoed use in the manner discussed, 75.163.147.50 (talk) 09:48, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: This article is about the Interim Committee and its decisions. For post-war debates, see Debate over the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:44, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  then article could discuss composition and exclusion of military leaders who were more aware of military strategy and war ramifications rather than chicken hawk civilians, as item on jurys can talk selection  and Voir dire. Juror1 (talk) 01:23, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The article discusses the composition of the Interim Committee. It was not specifically charged with making recommendations on the military use of nuclear weapons but the composition of the committee and the close relationship between the wartime use of nuclear weapons and post-war policies regarding them inevitably led to the Interim Committee's involvement. The Target Committee that met at Los Alamos on 10-11 May 1945 included Brigadier General Thomas Farrell, Colonel L.E. Seeman, Colonel William P. Fisher and Captain William S. Parsons USN, along with scientists Joyce C. Stearns, Richard Tolman, Robert Oppenheimer, Charles Lauritsen, Norman Ramsey, John von Neumann, Robert R. Wilson, William G. Penney and David M. Dennison. As the article notes, there was a movement at the time for nuclear weapons to be placed under civilian control. Hawkeye7 (talk) 02:23, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Military advice
Talk:Great Preston

message: I suggest this page be changed to that of the civil parish, with separate sections for the two communities.Chemical Engineer (talk) 16:34, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change to Great and Little Preston 
Talk:Department of Planning and Environment

message: I propose merging Department of Planning, Industry and Environment into Department of Planning and Environment (New South Wales). Main reason being that based on the latest Administrative Arrangements, the DPIE has been renamed DPE on 21 December 2021. It is convention that government departments formed from merging or demerging have their own Wikipedia pages. However, in essence the latest DPIE (since April 2020) is the same as previous incarnation of DPE and the now-established DPE, and they should all be merged into one article. It can be rewritten such that in April 2019, the department absorbed the functions from Department of Industry and renamed DPIE, then the (Primary) Industry portion of it got transferred away to the new Department of Regional NSW in April 2020 with the department retaining the DPIE name, before simplifying to the DPE name in December 2021. Marcnut1996 (talk) 06:19, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Pouch Attachment Ladder System

message: The section “Commercial products” mentions several manufacturers in prose, then includes a list of others.  The current version shows some issues:
# To a reader looking for the complete set, splitting the content between prose and list doesn't seem to be the most helpful.
# The current content doesn't follow its own rules, as at least one manufacturer is listed in both places.
I think a simple improvement would be to list all of the manufacturers in the list, and to say so in the text.  Any thoughts or objections?   Unician ∇  21:22, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Seeing no objections, this is done.   Unician ∇  21:20, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commercial products
Talk:Legislative districts of Cavite

message: How about not segregating those which are pre-2010 and post-2010 elections? There should a separate column ("Notes") saying it was redistricted. –Howard the Duck 05:59, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Continuity
Talk:Sea of Galilee Boat

message: A replica has been build in Flensburg, Germany, and is now based in Schleswig. Should this be noted? Maybe I can make a photo soon for illustrating the appearance. --185.26.182.31 (talk) 21:56, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replica 
Talk:Minister for the Environment and Water (Australia)

message: This needs to be merged with Minister for Sustainable Population (Australia).  --  Jack of Oz  ... speak! ...  10:13, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.--Grahame (talk) 01:56, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Lovely, thanks Graham.  --  Jack of Oz  ... speak! ...  11:01, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge required
Talk:Methley

message: I’m not sure how to use it, but mention might be made of the BBC article How my father gave me a terrifying lesson at 10. JDAWiseman (talk) 22:13, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Pogo

message: I changed
* Pogo, Alabama, a place in Franklin County, Alabama
to
* Pogo, Alabama, a place in Franklin County, Alabama
and User:Sesshomaru reverted, citing MoS:DAB#Red_links.  Huh?  That says:
:A link to a non-existent article (a "red link") should only be included on a disambiguation page when another article also includes that red link. There is no need to brainstorm all occurrences of the page title and create red links to articles that are unlikely ever to be written, or likely to be removed as insufficiently notable topics.
:If the only thing that uses the red link is the disambiguation page, unlink the "entry word" but still keep a blue link in the description. . . .
The only pages that link to Pogo, Alabama are this one and List of places in Alabama: O-R.  Is the latter a good enough reason to include a redlink?
:Red links should not be the only link in a given entry; link also to an existing article, so that a reader (as opposed to a contributing editor) will have somewhere to navigate to for additional information. . . .
Well, my version gives two blue links: to Franklin County, Alabama (note that F does not usually belong between O and R) and to a page which lists Pogo, which would be the usual way to link something with no article of its own.  
As a compromise, I could live with 
* Pogo, Alabama, a place in Franklin County, Alabama.
—Tamfang (talk) 22:49, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alabama 

message: POGO is a specific brand of "corn dog-like" cooked battered/breaded weiner on a stick... so "Pogo, a term for a corn dog in Quebec, Canada" seems insufficient.
I'm not sure if that's why people think Canadians call corndogs "Pogos" or if the POGO brand is derived from a pre-existing slang usage...
http://www.conagrabrands.ca/en/brands
https://www.walmart.ca/en/ip/pogo-original-cooked-battered-weiner-stick/6000001851378
https://www.ic.gc.ca/app/opic-cipo/trdmrks/srch/viewTrademark?id=1024483&lang=eng&tab=reg
https://www.ic.gc.ca/app/opic-cipo/trdmrks/srch/viewTrademark?id=1085508&lang=eng&tab=reg
SinbadEV (talk) 23:31, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Go ahead and rewrite it. The original claim that it is a generic term in Canada or at least Quebec is sourced in Corn dog. The IP's recent attempt to add the claim that it is a trademarked term in Canada was not sourced either in this article or in "Corn dog. Meters (talk) 00:09, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  POGO is a specific brand of cooked battered/breaded weiner on a stick in at least Ontario and Quebec
Talk:Marcus Claudius Marcellus Aeserninus

message: Since the Lusus Troiae was staged under the Julio-Claudians after Augustus, it can't be the case that the complaint of Asinius Pollio brought them to an end. Cynwolfe (talk) 18:22, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: A strict reading of Suetonius only says that Augustus never held the game again, not that it was not held again ever. I've made our article more circumspect, but I haven't checked any other sources; if there is still doubt on this point anyone should feel free to attribute the claim to Suetonius or remove it entirely. Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 20:47, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Troy Game
Talk:Isopropyl chloride

message: Can't find any examples of isopropyl chloride hydrolysis. It looks like it will hydrolize to isopropyl alcohol by reaction with dillute water solution of alkali hydroxide (weaker base like the mentioned in the article t-butoxide), and reaction with the alcoholic solution of alkali base will yield mostly the elimination product (propene).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.110.114.207 (talk) 23:38, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
Talk:Cars (Fear Factory song)

message: I support the proposed merging of the two articles. Freikorp (talk) 01:26, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Sandy Denny and the Strawbs

message: This should not redirect to the All Our Own Work album as it is NOT the same. Witchwooder 13:52, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should not be a redirect 

message: I suggest that this album is a Strawbs album and should not be included in Sandy Denny's solo discography any more than the Fairport albums she was involved with. The title was merely an advertising ploy and is a throwback to the original Pickwick album title "All Our Own Work by Sandy Denny and the Strawbs". This was recorded when Sandy was a full-time member of Strawbs but was not released until just after the success of "Part of the Union" which raised Strawbs profile considerably. Witchwooder (talk) 07:39, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sandy Denny was never a member of the Strawbs, I don't know where you have that information from. Sandy Denny had releases as a a solo singer even before these recordings. The recordings here were intended to be released as 'Sandy and The Strawbs'. *You know* the original cover artwork, reproduced on the Hallmark album. (The Strawbs also used the "The" at that time, as on their eary releases, a fact you like to deny too...(E-Kartoffel (talk) 16:12, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is a Strawbs album