Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Nine Inch Nails

message: I've nominated Trent Reznor for Featured Article status.  Take a look and feel free to post some comments and/or vote on whether or not you think it matches the criteria. Drewcifer (talk) 05:31, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As soon as I get home from school today I'll give it a review. --Brandt Luke Zorn (talk) 15:20, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trent Reznor at FAC 

message: Suggest merging here to avoid branching of collaboration. –Pomte 23:14, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Music/Nine Inch Nails task force]] 

message: After a bunch of editing of Year Zero (album), I've nominated it for GA status.  Take a look and let me know what you think! Drewcifer (talk) 10:21, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well that was easy.  It's already been given GA status.  I plan on nominating it for FA soon, so please take a look at the article and make any last minute edits you might want to. Drewcifer (talk) 07:20, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That's great news! It looks pretty good, and I think that taking it to FAC now would result in a pass once the whole process was completed. Tomorrow I want going to tweak a few more things before the nomination, if that's OK. --Brandt Luke Zorn (talk) 08:30, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course, go for it.  I think it could still use another copyedit sweep or two, so have at it! Drewcifer (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 09:16, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Is there anymore copyedits anyone feels needs to be done?  If not, I'll nominate it at FAC. Drewcifer (talk) 13:04, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The lead is still a little short, and it cold use a section about the music on the album. --Brandt Luke Zorn (talk) 18:01, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Good call.  I was looking through some of the other album FAs, and some of them have a similar section but some don't.  But I definitely think it would be relevant here.  Any articles in particular you think we should model it after?  1987 (What the Fuck Is Going On?) does something interesting, it describes each song in order.  But I'm not sure if I like that.  Be Here Now (album) does a pretty good job of it, I think.  Any ideas on how to proceed? Drewcifer (talk) 18:41, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that descriptions of songs are ideal when the track list is somewhat low and/or when information for each track is available (I did this with Spiderland, which has only six songs, each with a full individual review from AMG). I think that for this article, a section describing the album's sound more generally (like Be Here Now) would be a good idea. I'm not sure what the album sounds like (I've heard it only once, when it streamed online) so I can't really help there. I can create a sample or two for the article if you want; I think that "Survivalism" and probably "Capital G" would be good in the article, but if you want samples put in tell me which songs to use. --Brandt Luke Zorn (talk) 00:57, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Year Zero (album)]] at [[WP:GAN]]

message: Hey there! I'm a long time user of Wikipedia and I have now began to become more contributive to it. I would really like to help you guys with expanding wiki's database of Nine Inch Nails information seeing as I'm a huge fan. I've already started to edit some past touring band members pages, updating their status in the current configuration of the band. Anyways, thats all for now. user:Heckler1337 - added at 23:14 UTC , January 14, 2007  —Preceding comment was added at 23:18, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Awesome!  Welcome! Drewcifer (talk) 23:42, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hello There 

message: Perhaps we can upgrade this article from a stub to a start?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Heckler1337 (talk • contribs) 14:28, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd say it's borderline.  Feel free to change it if you like though. Drewcifer (talk) 14:31, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Alessandro Cortini]] 

message: After a HUGE remodeling, I think the NIN live page is ready for GAN.  I'll nominate it in the next few days, so if there's any last-minute additions/tweaks necessary, help yourself. Drewcifer (talk) 21:29, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Nine Inch Nails live performances]] 

message: Is 10 Miles High (and other NIN non-single tracks) really worth their own articles?  I was thinking about nominating if for deletion, but I thought I'd bring it up here first. Drewcifer (talk) 04:36, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The Alternative Music Wikiproject recently had a similar discussion, most of which centered on Nirvana songs. I would advise either redirecting the song to an album it appears on, or in cases where the song appears on multiple releases I would recommend nominating the article for deletion. --Brandt Luke Zorn (talk) 05:43, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Nominated 10 Miles High for deletion, along with The New Flesh, At the Heart of It All, Just Like You Imagined.  Joint nomination can be found here. Drewcifer (talk) 19:34, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  10 Miles High 

message: Since the main version of the song is titled "Closer," it appears on The Downward Spiral as "Closer," it appeared on MTV, radio, etc. as "Closer," the single is listed in Template:Nine Inch Nails as "Closer," and numerous editions (both commercial and promo) of the Halo Nine single (US/Australia cassette and UK CD 1, to name two) are officially titled "Closer," I would argue the logical primary namespace for that article should be Closer (Nine Inch Nails song). I propose moving the article and making Closer to God a redirect to it. If you have an objection, speak now.
Your friend, Augustus Chip (talk) 20:09, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  But to keep things all in one place, let's discuss the change at the article's talk page. Drewcifer (talk) 20:50, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move [[Closer to God]] to namespace: Closer (Nine Inch Nails song)? 

message: In the process of moving Closer (Nine Inch Nails song) to its new namespace, I found and re-redirected a bunch of pages that had redirected to Closer to God; several of these had nothing listed on their "What links here" sections:
*Fuck you like an animal
*Iwant to fuck you like an animal
*I want to fuck you like an animal
*Closer (precursor)
Any objections to the idea of getting rid of these pages? They seem useless to me. Also, assuming no one objects, how does one go about deleting them?
Your friend, Augustus Chip (talk) 21:37, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd leave them as is.  They aren't doing any harm, and I would imagine alot of people unfamiliar with NIN outside of this one song might not know the actual song title, so they'd try one of the lyrics. Drewcifer (talk) 21:47, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old ''Closer to God'' redirect pages 

message: So since we've got a pretty decent sized WikiProject on our hands – 13 people, not too shabby  –  howabout we figure out an article to collaborate on?  Something like a "Collaboration of the Month"?  I was thinking there's plenty of options to collaborate on, so maybe the first order of business would be to figure out which article.  Personally, I'd like to see Trent Reznor improved to FA status.  We could also focus on an album and perhaps work backwards  – YZ is already at FAC, and Ghosts is at GAN  – so I think that would leave With Teeth if we wanted to work backwards.  Any ideas or suggestions? Drewcifer (talk) 08:17, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Let's get this Discipline (song) in order. There is a little information right now, I just cleaned alot of OR out of the article AtaruMoroboshi (talk) 12:20, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think there's enough sources out just yet unfortunately.  Might wanna give things a bit of time to develop. Drewcifer (talk) 13:41, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think I jumped the gun - but I do think it's an article that we should give attention to. AtaruMoroboshi (talk) 13:45, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

text: Good point. Well, I think we just got our focus for a major studio release The Slip (album). News coverage is coming through slowly right now. AtaruMoroboshi (talk) 15:26, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Collaboration of the Month    ? 

message: Moved this from the Nine Inch Nails talk page. Drewcifer (talk) 05:10, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The long hard road to Featured Topic... 

message: Portal:Nine Inch Nails, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Nine Inch Nails and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).  You are free to edit the content of Portal:Nine Inch Nails during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion.  Thank you. Ultra! 19:47, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: MfD nomination of [[Portal:Nine Inch Nails]]

message: As you may have heard, we at the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial Team recently made some changes to the assessment scale, including the addition of a new level.  The new description is available at WP:ASSESS.
*The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.  
*The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.  
*A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.  
Each WikiProject should already have a new C-Class category at :Category:C-Class_articles.  If your project elects not to use the new level, you can simply delete your WikiProject's C-Class category and clarify any amendments on your project's assessment/discussion pages.  The bot is already finding and listing C-Class articles. 
Please leave a message with us if you have any queries regarding the introduction of the revised scheme.  This scheme should allow the team to start producing offline selections for your project and the wider community within the next year.  Thanks for using the Wikipedia 1.0 scheme! For the 1.0 Editorial Team, §hepBot (Disable) 21:10, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes to the WP:1.0 assessment scheme

message: Here goes nothing.  Check it out! Drewcifer (talk) 05:17, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured Topic Candidate 

message: Wikipedia 0.7 is a collection of English Wikipedia articles due to be released on DVD, and available for free download, later this year. The Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team has made an automated selection of articles for Version 0.7.
We would like to ask you to review the articles selected from this project. These were chosen from the articles with this project's talk page tag, based on the rated importance and quality. If there are any specific articles that should be removed, please let us know at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.7. You can also nominate additional articles for release, following the procedure at Wikipedia:Release Version Nominations. 
A list of selected articles with cleanup tags, sorted by project, is available. The list is automatically updated each hour when it is loaded. Please try to fix any urgent problems in the selected articles. A team of copyeditors has agreed to help with copyediting requests, although you should try to fix simple issues on your own if possible. 
We would also appreciate your help in identifying the version of each article that you think we should use, to help avoid vandalism or POV issues. These versions can be recorded at this project's subpage of User:SelectionBot/0.7. We are planning to release the selection for the holiday season, so we ask you to select the revisions before October 20. At that time, we will use an automatic process to identify which version of each article to release, if no version has been manually selected. Thanks! For the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team, SelectionBot 23:26, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia 0.7 articles have been selected for Nine Inch Nails 

message: Hi!  I'd like to draw your attention to the new WikiProject coordinators' working group, an effort to bring both official and unofficial WikiProject coordinators together so that the projects can more easily develop consensus and collaborate.  This group has been created after discussion regarding possible changes to the A-Class review system, and that may be one of the first things discussed by interested coordinators.
All designated project coordinators are invited to join this working group.  If your project hasn't formally designated any editors as coordinators, but you are someone who regularly deals with coordination tasks in the project, please feel free to join as well. — Delievered by §hepBot (Disable) on behalf of the WikiProject coordinators' working group at 06:09, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinators' working group 

message: Sorry, delete this in a few days if you care to, but I've been looking at a few pages and I can help, however, who should I message to try a joint participation? I'm new so I'm still strugling, but I'm knowledgeable. Thank you. No Stahr (talk) 18:43, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: New at Wiki but very informative

message: Hello Wikiproject! Currently there is a discussion which will decide whether wikipedia will delete 49,000 articles about a living person without references, here:
Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Biographies of living people
Since biographies of living people covers so many topics, many wikiproject topics will be effected.
The two opposing positions which have the most support is:  
# supports the deletion of unreferenced articles about a living person, User:Jehochman
# opposes the deletion of unreferenced articles about a living person, except in limited circumstances, User:Collect
Comments are welcome.  Keep in mind that by default, editor's comments are hidden. Simply press edit next to the section to add your comment. 
Please keep in mind that at this point, it seems that editors support deleting unreferenced BLP articles if they are not sourced, so your project may want to source these articles as soon as possible. See the next, message, which may help. 
===Tools to help your project with unreferenced Biographies of living people===
;List of cleanup articles for your project
If you don't already have this and are interested in creating a list of articles which need cleanup for your wikiproject see:  Cleanup listings A list of examples is here
;Moving unreferenced blp articles to a special "incubation pages" 
If you are interested in moving unreferenced blp articles that your project covers, to a special "incubation page",  contact me, User talk:Ikip
;Watchlisting all unreferenced articles
If you are interested in watchlisting all of the unreferenced articles once you install Cleanup_listings, contact me, User talk:Ikip
Ikip  05:24, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for comment on Biographies of living people

message: ;List of cleanup articles for your project
If you don't already have this and are interested in creating a list of articles which need cleanup for your wikiproject see:  Cleanup listings A list of examples is here
;Moving unreferenced blp articles to a special "incubation pages" 
If you are interested in moving unreferenced blp articles that your project covers, to a special "incubation page",  contact me, User talk:Ikip
;Watchlisting all unreferenced articles
If you are interested in watchlisting all of the unreferenced articles once you install Cleanup_listings, contact me, User talk:Ikip
Ikip  05:24, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Tools to help your project with unreferenced Biographies of living people

message: Dont realy see any activity here. Think its best to make this a task force of Alternative music. I propose we move this projects to Wikipedia:WikiProject Alternative music/Nine Inch Nails task force. What do you think?Moxy (talk) 01:09, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, agreed. --Kleinzach 03:13, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to make this  task force  

message: Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment on the WikiProject X proposal 

message: Hello everyone!
You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!
Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.
Harej (talk) 16:57, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject X is live! 

message: Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for information on WP1.0 web tool