lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Bourbon Reforms

message: I plan to edit this page and write up some more information/details about the importance of the Bourbon Reforms and its affect on Spanish history and Western Civilization.
hey  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.26.103.153 (talk) 16:28, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit

message: This article talks about Spain and Spanish America but doesn't mention the Philippines or Guam.  I assume add a sentence or paragraph or two. --Bruce Hall (talk) 05:13, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: What about the Philippines?

message: 2nd para, section Catholic Church states 'The Catholic Church came about as a religious and political entity in the Iberian Peninsula in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries' which doesn't make sense as written. Bad paraphrasing? Please address and correct.50.111.45.222 (talk) 02:37, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  sentence needs re-writing 

message: In the sentences "The Spanish were caught in an ever tightening noose of imperial rivalry abroad with the British, the French, and the Portuguese. They were all fighting for domination in the Atlantic trade. Spain's problems with its neighbor were the biggest concern, and the Spanish Bourbons made constant short-term adjustments to colonial and increasingly, continental war-making." the singular "neighbor" is problematic, as both Portugal and France are adjacent and both have also been mentioned in the prior sentence. Since the Spanish throne was held by the French, the reference is presumably to Portugal but someone with proper knowledge of the rationale for this statement should edit this for clarity.  Dragonbones (talk) 04:06, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ambiguity in the term "its neighbor"
Talk:Bourbon Spain

message: Please consider delete this page ASAP as I need to move 'Enlightened Spain' here.Pktlaurence (talk) 05:55, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: No, I think you should take a break from moving any pages for a while, at least until the mess you've created gets cleaned up. Sro23 (talk) 05:58, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contested deletion
Talk:Chronicle of 754

message: "tolerant" Umayyads?  Hmm, why use that adjective, I would leave it out, it's both debatable and besides the point.Cutugno (talk) 18:44, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. Another: what does the first footnote mean? De rebus Hispaniae looks like a later Hispanic chronicle in Latin to me. Srnec (talk) 02:32, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

text: The first footnote is tosh. If Chrystys said it, she was dreaming. But I doubt even she would have said that. The De rebus Hispanie (or better, Historia gothica, since that's the title the author gave it) is a History, not strictly speaking a Chronicle (where entries are ordered by date). But there is the ninth-century Chronicle of Alfonso III stitched together with a good deal of imagination in the Asturias, so I think the footnote should be put out of its misery. Hostiensis (talk) 15:35, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Durruti Column

message: The standard of English in this article leaves quite a lot to be desired. A literate native speaker should give it a thorough edit. I would do it myself but unfortunately I am swamped with work right now.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.211.40.77 (talk) 09:57, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Standard of English 

message: "Even though the column did not stop to liberate as much countries as other columns, due to its size, it created the majority of the libertarian communes"
I thought the column only operated in Spain. How could it have liberated other countries?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 148.87.19.218 (talk) 00:48, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Many countries? 

message: Would not be nice to have a list of known members of the column?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 148.87.19.194 (talk) 22:03, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Members 
Talk:Argaric culture

message: This chapter is too self-contradictin (2200 vs. 1800 for the start-off) as to be convincing at all.
Perhaps the reason are too old dates achieved in some tests of the KIA labaratory (see Radiocarbon journal).HJJHolm (talk) 14:24, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Periodization 

message: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/El_Argar
This article seems to be covering the same subject  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.45.107.10 (talk) 09:26, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplication
Talk:Eleanor of Alburquerque

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 01:40, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Planh

message: There are no inline citations for this particular article, and the only footnote leads to another unhelpful Wikipedia page with a singular inline citation stating the title of a book with a page number. I don't find this very precise and can't find any other data confirming the content on this article.
Developer Coda (talk) 05:00, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Footnotes added. For the list, see . Srnec (talk) 02:21, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  No inline citations
Talk:Gausón

message: This article must be deeply reformed or eliminated. It is clear that such a "hero" did not exist. Everything is based on an interpolation on a manuscript, as the proper author of 1613, Carvallo, recognizes it in the quote: "I only found the name of the tree captains in a clause of the codex the Master Guardian brought from Lotario...". --Alicia M. Canto (talk) 20:31, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:Guaraní War

message: I plan to add more information on the background of this conflict. Specifically I plan to add more information on the missions and the Guarani living there, as well as some information on the origin of the Treaty of Madrid, which caused the war. I also plan on adding some more information on the conflict itself. As the article is not much more than a brief overview of the conflict, I think there is a lot of room for improvement. I can include more information on the course of the conflict and its aftermath. My sources right now included the two that are already cited on the page:
Jeffrey D. Burson; Jonathan Wright (29 October 2015). The Jesuit Suppression in Global Context: Causes, Events, and Consequences 
Ganson, Barbara Anne (2003). The Guarani Under Spanish Rule in the Rio de la Plata. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press. 
I also have found the following English language sources: 
Owens, David James. "Spanish—Portuguese Territorial Rivalry in Colonial Río De La Plata." Yearbook. Conference of Latin Americanist Geographers 19 (1993): 15-24. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25765781.
Jackson, Robert H. "The Population and Vital Rates of the Jesuit Missions of Paraguay, 1700-1767." The Journal of Interdisciplinary History 38, no. 3 (2008): 401-31. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20143650.
Reiter, Frederick J. They Built Utopia: The Jesuit Missions in Paraguay, 1610-1798. Vol. 116., Potomac, Md.: Scripta Humanistica, 1995.
Sarreal, Julia J. S. The Guarani and their Missions: A Socioeconomic History. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2014.
Bvesper (talk) 14:22, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Edits 

message: Hello Wikipedians
I have an idea to make the Gurani War article sound better. The section where the "7 Jesuit Missions" are described should be merged with the below sentence regarding the naming of the missions. Otherwise the article looks good so far.
Dnaugle21 (talk) 03:00, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Edits (Dnaugle21) 

message: Calling the Guarani resistors to their expulsions from the Jesuit missions- Rebels, is not accurate.
Rebels seems to imply that their expulsions were right and just.
I suggest changing that word to fighters. 135.180.182.100 (talk) 02:35, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Guarani War
Talk:Hammudid dynasty

message: These sources say Berber., 
And we have Ali ibn Hammud al-Nasir  Doug Weller talk 18:38, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: And when the book by Watt was introduced as a source, Kansas Bear wrote "The Hammudid dynasty was a BerberWilliam Montgomery Watt, Pierre Cachia, A History of Islamic Spain, (Edinburgh University Press, 2001), 92.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doug Weller (talk • contribs) 18:41, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Berber? 

message: In which way this dynasty is Berberised? There language? There culture? There heritage? There art? How they are Berberised? Please explain what is the cultural and language influence on this dynasty from the Berbers? Please explain that for me before you delete my edits. 
Dear , thank you for your advice. As you see I'm discussing a lot of topics on the Talk page, I do not want to be in an Edit War as you said, and I hope you will discuss with me as well.
:First learn to sign your posts. Second, Bosworth calls the Hammudids Berberised Arabs, check the source in the article. --Kansas Bear (talk) 15:41, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  How they are Berberised?
Talk:Pastorela

message: This page is really a glossary item. Fine for a wiki like Cunnan from whence it came, but it is probably too small for wikipedia where even three paragraphs is considered a stub. I think it should be merged with pastourelle. Conrad Leviston 01:34, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.  Enough information exists that both could make it beyond stub; and I don't have anything against short but complete articles.  But the connections between the two terms are enough that for now at least they belong together. --Myke Cuthbert 06:30, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Jean Orry

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.britannica.com/biography/Jean-Orry. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:22, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Bourse du Travail

message: It's kinda a mess as I tear things down and re-build.  Things will remain messy, uncited, and full of stupid errors through 6/28.T L Miles 18:51, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding substantial amount: 2007-06-27 
Talk:Junta (Peninsular War)

message: The Goya painting, The Junta of the Philipines is inappropriate here.  This is a painting of the Board of the Royal Company of the Philippines, not of a Peninsular War-era (government) junta.  I do understand the desire to find images of these juntas, which, except in the American cases due to a desire to commemorate them, are rare.TriniMuñoz (talk) 02:55, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Goya painting
Talk:List of Leonese monarchs

message: A user keeps moving this article title to King of Leon (monarch). Why do you want to confuse it with the band? This title matchs all the other Iberian monarchs' article.--Queen Elizabeth II's Little Spy (talk) 20:51, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title  

message: This article says "In the reign of Ordoño I of Asturias (850–866), the kingdom began to be known as that of León". The article on the kingdom of León says "García [I] is the first of the kings described by the charters as reigning in León". I find all this quite confusing because it sounds to me a land called Asturias was also called León from 850 to 910, then called only León in 910 and after that. However, at the same time, Ordoño I and Alfonso III are listed as kings of León but the description says Garcia was the first king of León so I don't see why Ordoño I and Alfonso III should be listed before him.
ICE77 (talk) 08:02, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistency
Talk:List of Spanish colonial wars in Morocco

message: :Any additional comments:
The following was moved from above.
* Oppose. The wars in questions happened on Moroccan soil without a provocation from Morocco. They are part of the colonial wave that swept through Africa from different European powers. To see that as a pro-Morocco position is ridiculous. If that was not colonial, what was is then, crusades?.--A Jalil 18:13, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay Fine - I don't want to argue the moral value of the Scramble for Africa, let alone the Crusades (?). That statement doesn't actually address the question that I raised above about moving this to the proper capitalization. Do you have anything to say about that? -Justin (koavf)·T·C·M 18:38, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.</div>
This article has been renamed  as the result of a move request. --Stemonitis 07:53, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion 

message: Como que las plazas de soberanía tienen nada que ver con el colonialismo??? 
Es lo que tiene cuando se intenta hacer algo muy grande, que se hace mal. Por lo menos referenciar los artículos, que no está de mas... Un desafectuoso saludo.--Hispania2 (talk) 10:13, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion maxima 

message: Hchcjfnf 196.117.92.130 (talk) 18:30, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conquest of Larache 1681
Talk:Murray Maxwell

message: For the record his obituary in "The Gentleman's Magazine" gives his date of death as the 26th of June; http://books.google.com/books?id=MPgRAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA272&dq=murray+maxwell+1831 or if that doesn't work http://icanhide.com/index.php?q=aHR0cDovL2Jvb2tzLmdvb2dsZS5jb20vYm9va3M%2FaWQ9TVBnUkFBQUFZQUFKJnBnPVBBMjcyJmRxPW11cnJheSttYXh3ZWxsKzE4MzE%3D .  A Biographical Dictionary of Eminent Scotsmen from 1870 says the same; http://books.google.com/books?id=2z8DAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA117&dq=murray+maxwell+1831  --Harlsbottom (talk | library | book reviews) 23:54, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that he almost certainly died on 26 June, that is why that was the date I gave in the lead. However, given that two sources give a different date I felt it was worthwhile to record the discrepancy. (By the way, your second link above doesn't appear to work). Regards--Jackyd101 (talk) 08:07, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of Death
Talk:Lucía Sánchez Saornil

message: Actually this photo - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Lucia-sanchez-saornil.jpg - depicts not Lucía Sánchez Saornil but Marina Ginestà and there is more information about this here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marina_Ginest%C3%A0 .  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.174.58.65 (talk) 10:48, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lucía Sánchez Saornil/Marina Ginestà confusion 
Talk:Muniadona of Castile

message: We have a conflict between the pages for Sancho and Muniadona regarding the list of children, specifically the 'other' Ramiro.  It has been too long since I looked at these sources, but I remember one scholar (I think Ubieto Arteta) mentioning the charter showing Garcia, his brother Ramiro, and his other brother Ramiro as indication that Sancho had a legitimate son Ramiro in addition to the well-documented illegitimate one.  However, I also remember another scholar suggesting that the document was corrupt, and that Ramiro has mistakenly been written for Fernando.  Unfortunately, I no longer recall who this was.  Does Martínez Diez address this specifically?  Either way, the two pages need to be harmonized. Agricolae (talk) 18:34, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: For now I removed the second Ramiro (mentioned in charter from S. Millán and by Govantes, and also Bernardo, in Albelda and mentioned by Moret, pending further confirmation from more modern secondary sources. --Maragm (talk) 12:16, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Son Ramiro
Talk:Mercedes of Orléans

message: What illness was? The Spanish version says typhus like many pages found in Google.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.244.23.16 (talk) 01:02, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tuberculosis of Typhus
Talk:Tumult of Aranjuez

message: I am concerned this article deals with far more than the Mutiny of Aranjuez. Shouldn't it end with the consequences of the mutiny and point to other Wikipedia pages on the lead up to the Peninsular War? I am a noob.Janifrax12 (talk) 20:23, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: I have added a couple, but left the flag, as these are a bit weak Timpo (talk) 15:05, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:2008 Mahoran departmental election

message: As far as I can see there were no separate elections in mayotte. This article can be deleted. Electionworld Talk? 18:08, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The CIA world factbook states that legislative elections for the island's parliament are due in 2007. The French wikipedia has an article on a 2007 legislative election in Mayotte, but it is not clear (to me anyway) if this refers to electing a representative for the French Parliament or for the island's parliament. Number 57 19:59, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The French article is on the legislative election for the French National Assembly seat. —Nightstallion 20:45, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

text: So, what do we do now? —Nightstallion 14:49, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Wait and hope someone who actually knows comes along, or petition the Mahoran government to get a website! :) Number 57 22:29, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Seriously, though: It has to be held this year, right? —Nightstallion 09:04, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If the information about it being every three years, then yes. Does the island have a newspaper online? Perhaps that could be a source. Number 57 18:21, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

text: I found this one but it seems the 10 June elections were the ones for the Mahoran representative in the French Parliament. Perhaps it is later this year. Number 57 18:29, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Possibly, yes... Mh. Until then, what do we say in the article? —Nightstallion 18:58, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess just go back to "Legislative elections are due to be held in Mayotte in 2007" using the CIA World factbook as a source. Number 57 19:16, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Likely the best idea, yeah. —Nightstallion 08:16, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  No elections
Talk:Peace of Münster

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Westfaelischer Friede in Muenster (Gerard Terborch 1648).jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on February 28, 2016. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2016-02-28. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:51, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Westfaelischer Friede in Muenster (Gerard Terborch 1648).jpg]] to appear as POTD soon 

message: I've added some references and expanded the detail so I've removed the tags but please let me know if any comments for improvement.
Robinvp11 (talk) 17:52, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove Tags
Talk:Pedro Henriquez de Acevedo, Count of Fuentes

message: Date of death and details of death are wrong??? Didn't he die at Rocroi in 1643?. He is depicted in the Viggo Mortgenson movie, Altarista. He was carried, and fought from a litter.
: I don't think so. My sources list him as dying in 1610 as well.Hchc2009 (talk) 09:42, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  When he dies
Talk:Astur-Leonese dynasty

message: Outside of Wikipedia, I have never heard this family referred to as the 'Pérez dynasty'. Agricolae (talk) 04:31, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Neither have I. I may have created it (some three years ago) based on something I read at the Spanish Wiki. The term "dinastia Pérez" is used on the Catalan. Shall we move it to Beni Alfons then? Srnec (talk) 06:18, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know about that either.  I have only seen it in Arabic sources, and in Spanish or English sources saying it was the name used by Arabic sources.  Usually in English sources, they are called the Astur-Leonese Dynasty, or something of the sort, but there doesn't appear to be a consensus. Agricolae (talk) 00:21, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've also seen Banu Alfonso. "Astur-Leonese dynasty" sounds more like a description than a name. Srnec (talk) 03:31, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

text: Better this than a neologism. However, if you think the page ought to be simply deleted (because it can't get much better than it is now), say so. Srnec (talk) 05:25, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page name 

message: This article should be merged into the House of Asturias one as a section, wich is the dinasty in wich the "Beni Alfons" are included. Also, the name is the one given by Arabic sources to the family, wich could be logic on Arabic WP, but not on English WP (main reason is that they are not an Arabic or Muslim dinasty, but Castilian and Christian).--HCPUNXKID (talk) 17:45, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: If anything, House of Asturias should be merged here, since this page is older and is more of a collaborative effort. The final title of the merged page we can decide later. There are several options, but I do not particularly like "House of Asturias". Srnec (talk) 01:48, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge into House of Asturias