lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Western Sahara Autonomy Proposal

message: "Autonomy for Western Sahara" sounds like it addresses a whole range of autonomy considerations, when really this page is about the recently submitted Moroccan proposal for Autonomy.  The title should reflect this. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.17.68.6 (talk • contribs).
:I moved this page to Moroccan Initiative for the Western Sahara. It seems like the most "official" name, especially given this link. Certainly, that site might not be 100-percent neutral, but the name sounds good, right? — Rebelguys2 talk 00:15, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! Threepwolfe 19:15, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As you are talking about autonomy. I wonder why Backer Plan is on the page. The Autonomy initiative is quite different from the Backer Plan I & II.--Moroccansahraoui (talk) 11:40, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-thinking this title 

message: propasal letter 105.160.31.199 (talk) 09:21, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  resource management
Talk:Kumbala

message: Whoa, whoa, whoa. What happened here? First it was titled "Kumble", then "Kumbla", and then "Kumbala". I'm from this town, and we certainly write it as "Kumbla", and it is pronounced "koom-bleh", not "Koom-baa-laa"!
rr 20:52, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What happened?
Category talk:Root vegetables

message: /wiki/Chard
should be added  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.197.66.155 (talk) 18:34, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: March 2009

message: should wild plants with edible roots be included in this category? Hellebore (talk) 14:22, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I would think no, that it should focus on cultivated culinary vegetables. Most wild plants' roots are edible to some degree. —Hyperik ⌜talk⌟ 17:07, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: wild tubers
Talk:Work-at-home scheme

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot 05:50, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-04-13 Automated pywikipediabot message 

message: I removed the following sentence from the end of the Consequences section because it looked to me like vandalism:
:Urban term for working at home is Durick
I think "Durick" is a surname. What else it might be, I don't know. I've certainly never heard of working at home being called "Durick." It just doesn't ring true. If someone knows that this is legitimate, please restore the material, but include more information and, for goodness sake, a source! —CKA3KA (Skazka) (talk) 07:17, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Durick? 

message: The article doesn't say a word on what the very deceit is. Is it low payment? Or not paying for the job at all? Making to sign a fraudulent contract? How does a conner actually 'extort' money as the preface mentions? I can't figure that. — Vano 08:54, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The article mentions an "initial fee to join", but you're right, this should be more obvious. Skimming the sources, the other obvious con is to sell apparently cheap goods to the victim for resale, which turn out to be worthless or very hard to resell. I'll update the article. --McGeddon (talk) 09:32, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: There's also the classic "envelope stuffing" scam, which this article didn't go into any detail about, despite envelope stuffing redirecting to it. Not sure if this has been deleted by a scammer over the years; I've written it up in the lead. --McGeddon (talk) 09:57, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The scheme itself 

message: I've added a few following points to types of work and how people sell these course on making money online.
Teaching people by giving them some info product on make money online.
Coaching programs on make money online180.215.233.178 (talk) 17:59, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes I have Done 

message: — Assignment last updated by Ys5220 (talk) 17:33, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - SU23 - Sect 200 - Thu
Talk:Anthony Cooper (Lost)

message: Could someone give him an info box?DECBOY23 13:35, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Info Box

message: There is still not consensus for anthony Cooper to have his own page.  It is very possible that he won't survive The Brig which would give him a grand total of 5 episodes.  --thedemonhog talk contributions 23:44, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect
Talk:Piezoelectric sensor

message: I would like to know the pronunciation.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Punstress (talk • contribs) 17:18, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

message: We need a diagram like  or  — Omegatron 02:17, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diagram 

message: Anyone got any info on this ?
Keller-Druck would be the people to ask.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 161.184.145.73 (talk) 21:38, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Frequency range  ??? 

message: Up to 105 N/m²... seems like quite a small number?? Jdpipe (talk) 01:29, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modulus of elasticity

message: Please note that piezoelectric sensors can and actually are used both below, in, and beyond the resonant range.
Also, that there is typically much more than a single resonant frequency.
Therefore the figure "Frequency response of a piezoelectric sensor; output voltage vs applied force" - is misleading simplification, only applicable to specific kind of piezoelectric sensor (possibly a guitar pickup)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.105.184.252 (talk) 23:48, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  frequency range 

message: I can't find a wiki entry on this anywhere. If one exists, this article should surely link to it.
Tabby (talk) 21:25, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Piezo transducers as sounders

message: the citation https://www.ti.com/lit/an/sloa033a/sloa033a.pdf has a resistance *in parallel* with the main capacitance. TI's paper calls this resistance Rp and the main capacitance Cp, while the first circuit diagram in Wikipedia has "Ce" but that capacitance doesn't have a parallel resistance.  TI's paper says "the resistance accounts for the dissipation of static charge."  That seems to be important enough to include in the model.  I am just trying to reconcile what that TI article says with Wikipedia's first circuit diagram. Em3rgent0rdr (talk) 05:18, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Electrical properties section's diagram seems to be missing parallel resistance for main capacitor
Talk:The Happiness Boys

message: Since this song comments on events that took place in 1927, it doesn't seem possible that it was written before then. I tried to follow up on the cited source, but it's behind the New York Times login. Does anyone have a better citation? Szarka (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 17:20, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of Composition for "Since Henry Ford Apologized to Me"
Talk:Portmadoc, Beddgelert and South Snowdon Railway

message: Do any drawings or photos of PBSSR locos exist? wahington@printing41.fsnet.co.uk
There's a basic drawing here: http://www.modelrailways.tv/narrow_gauge/locomotives.htm Zabdiel (talk) 16:33, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Locomotive pictures

message: This appears to be two articles in one. I will try to merge them. Biscuittin (talk) 08:58, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-write
Talk:Uptown Toronto

message: I question this definition of Uptown Toronto. Historically Uptown was the area around the university, including Yorkville. This definition is still used by the city on its Discovery Walks page, and was the origin of the name of the Uptown Theatre. In my personal experience when people today say they live in the Uptown area, they mean the St. Clair area between Young and Bathurst. The [Uptwon Younge Business Improvement Area http://www.toronto.ca/bia/pdf/uptownyonge.pdf] has yet another definition, placing the region between Eglinton and Lawrence. - SimonP 13:49, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Thomas More College Student Government (Kentucky)

message: This page should grow exponentially in the coming week, adding it into the main body of Thomas More College (Kentucky) will become problematic.
:Either way though ,a Student Government section isn't really noteworth at all - it should be a subsection under Thomas More College (Kentucky) when it gets enough info (right now there's not enough info to add it). danielfolsom © 19:44, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: In Progress
Talk:Reminder software

message: "Reminder software" may not be the best title for this article.  Maybe something along the lines of "Events reminder services"?  And, since the article does not have an agreed, generally used standard title, no matter what it is called, most people interested in the subject will not find it -- until it contains the names of the major services, such as MemoToMe, so that content searches will find it. (Of course, I certainly won't waste my time trying to improve the article in any such major ways, since someone is sure to object and take such useful information out.)-69.87.199.140 19:01, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title
Talk:Muzzle-loading rifle

message: These two articles were on the same subject, although I have now mentioned smaller muzzle loaded rifles, so perhaps they aren't really the same any more.  However, the same information is still present in both articles so some sort of merge or split needs to be done.  Incorporate Rifled muzzle loader within Muzzle-loading rifle, or move out artillery to Rifled muzzle loader?  I would prefer merging as RML seems to have meant a modified smoothbore gun,  at least in Britain. Jll 14:11, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: One is a naval weapon {Rifled muzzle loader} and the other is an infantry personal weapon. I am not convinced that the two will merge, or should.--Anthony.bradbury 23:51, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging [[Rifled muzzle loader]] and [[Muzzle-loading rifle]]

message: First, I think merging "rifled muzzleloader" and "muzzle-loading rifle" is a bad idea, as "rifled muzzle-loader" is a official designation specifically referring to large, rifled muzzle-loading artillery pieces (i.e. a "rifle" being a term for a rifled artillery piece), while "muzzleloading rifle" refers to small, handheld rifled firearms. These are not really the same subject. If you insist on merging the two, the two topics should be dealt with differently, and clearly, not haphazardly, leaving you guessing about which is which.
Which brings me too my next point. "Muzzle-loader" only covers muzzle-loading small arms, for some reason. Why is there a page covering RIFLED muzzle-loading artillery, but nothing at all about the earlier smoothbore muzzleloading artillery? They made a lot more smoothbore muzzleloading guns than RMLs? First, there ought to be a page about smoothbore muzzleloaders. Second, by the justification you used for blending the articles about rifled artillery and rifled small arms, then "muzzle-loader" OUGHT to cover artillery as well as small arms, and there ought to be a dedicated page to SMOOTHBORE muzzleloaders as well, both artillery and small arms. Although personally I'd rather see a dedicated page for muzzleloading artillery covering both smoothbore and rifled guns, and onecovering both smoothbore and rifled small arms. That seems the most logical to me, since the ims and concerns for each are so vastly different, and when you blend the two topics together, you end up with people interested in small arms and vice versa coming in and making additions all over the page without saying whether they are referring to artillery or small arms, or neglecting to state whether it applies only to small arms, or to both. Often, they don't know, because they only know about one area. All good reasons NOT to merge the articles, unless you can write it and lay it out properly and keep people from messing it up. I already re-wrote a lot of this page to make it coherent; it's been a while though, so I don't recall how much I got finished or whether it's been ruined yet..45Colt 01:29, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: See Smoothbore and Cannon for smoothbore coverage. RobDuch (talk) 23:02, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Muzzle-loading artillery, smoothbore
Talk:Erasmus/Socrates Partners of Marmara University

message: When I saw this page, I had no idea what the list was for. A Google search for the term Erasmus/Socrates returned a bunch of sites with either Erasmus or Socrates programs described, all dealing with student exchange programs in the European Union. However, I don't know how they apply to the list here. So, would someone more knowledgable than I please edit this so as to clarify the meaning of the contents, other than that this list contains schools that are partners in a Erasmus/Socrates program? Kurrurrin 14:11, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Context
Talk:Echoes of Eternity

message: Re: Echoes of Eternity's notability
As the editorial director of GuitarHead.net, I would argue that this band is notable for several reasons and that this article should remain, albeit with addenda and editing as deemed necessary. My reasons are outlined below.
1 Given the marketing, promotion, and distribution of this band's debut record, I would suggest many other individuals or organizations would require unbiased and comprehensive information on the band. Wikipedia is a trusted source of such information, and I believe it would be remiss to remove it from this encyclopedia.
2 This band has been signed to Nuclear Blast records, which there is a team of professionals who believe it has a financial future. In light of this, I believe there is a good chance the band will continue to develop and more information will come to light, which in turn would (hopefully!) be worthy of encyclopedic inclusion.
3 In terms of musical dynamics and guitar techniques, the band shows both promise and originality, and is quite likely to generate interest, emulation and further study. Although this type of speculation can not be readily quantified as justifying notability, I would suggest that it would push the band in the direction of the 'grey area' of exceptions to the rules.
4 I make these arguments as a reviewer with no financial, social or similar affiliation with the band, who strives to be as objective as humanly possible. Having heard the work of many bands who, quite rightly, are not featured on Wikipedia, it is my professional opinion that Echoes of Eternity have hallmarks which render them sufficiently notable for inclusion.
58.179.20.234 14:12, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't feel the band's notability is in question. LuciferMorgan 21:39, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The band has soundscaned 1,676 albums in America as of 4/18/07.  Is that notable enough?
208.48.150.6 11:42, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sales
Talk:John Gloster

message: I am curious why the categories were considered not appropriate? Is it not an article about someone who claims notability from his cricket work. Isn't his work with the cricket team of India? JBEvans 14:20, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categories 
Talk:Nagu

message: Article says:
:Nagu consists of [...] and 1500–3000 smaller islands and skerries [...]
:Most of the islands belonging to the Nagu archipelago can be reached by a network of roads, bridges and cost-free connection boats [...]
I haven't been there (alas), but can more than 750 islands actually be reached by the described means? Or should "most" be modified to sth else? A skerry may defined as a rocky island, too small for habitation - but still included in the category "island".--Nø (talk) 11:00, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Connections
Talk:Oakley, Bedfordshire

message: I have added a merge tag to the Lincroft Middle School article suggesting that it be incorporated into this article. Perhaps someone with local knowledge and sources might like to either do that, or if they feel it more appropriate, add more detail and referencing to the existing article. Tafkam (talk) 11:00, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lincroft Middle
Talk:Motorcycle handlebar

message: The article currently links to Motorcycle fork when it says 'short handles are attached directly to the front forks'. Perhaps it should link instead to the Fork tube article. -AndrewDressel 06:48, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Attachment point

message: Currently, the article has these handlebar types listed:
:Ape hangers
:Beach bars
:Clip-on
:Cruiser
:Drag bars
In which of those categories would the one-piece handlebars on the Ducati in the article, or any other standard motorcycle be?  I don't think this list is exhaustive, or even covers the most common case. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 204.112.152.144 (talk) 01:43, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to help fill in the list. -AndrewDressel 13:43, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Types of handlebars" only lists specialized types 

message: The "Reference" section includes links to two handlebar manufacturers.  I can see no reason for WP to provide free advertising for them.  Can anyone explain WP's rules for such things? Bricology (talk) 01:06, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: They are being used as references, not external links. Per WP:PRESERVE, can you find better references to use? tedder (talk) 01:19, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing links to commercial sites 

message: Editor  a definition search for the word yoke does not reveal this term is used for a specific motorcycle part. I am not saying this term is not used at all to refer to a motorcycle part. But this term does not even appear to be that commonly used in England in place of triple tree clamp. A search on UK ebay for yoke  and a search for triple tree clamp there . The term yoke does seems to be used in Britain more for the steering stem of the tree rather than the triple tree clamp as a whole.                                                                                                                                                                             
But all that notwithstanding, your argument appears only to be that England invented clip ons, there for their grammar should be used when referring to steering parts, I don't believe this holds water. -72bikers (talk) 18:01, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Triple tree clamp verse yoke
Talk:Ply (game theory)

message: :This correspondence between Elo points and ply search depth is unclear. Is there a reference? If Deep Blue could search to a depth of 12 ply, does this mean Deep Blue is rated at 12 x 80 = 960? Since Deep Blue defeated Kasparov who had a rating over 2800, this doesn't make sense. Nor does it make sense that a player rated 1600 could search 1600/80 = 20 ply. An example is needed to clarify this correspondence, if indeed it is valid.
This is a discussion of the article, so it belongs in the Talk namespace, not in the main namespace. Anyway, for your "sense" point, as I tried to point out in my previous edit summary, the article only claims that the correspondence is linear, not that it is proportional. That is, a 12 ply engine will be rated 80 points above a 11 ply engine, or 160 points above a 10 ply engine, etc. If 2800 corresponds to 12 ply (just my rough ballpark here), then the 1600 player would (if he was an engine, at least: I think it was only meant to be valid for engines) have a search depth of 1200/80 = 15 ply lower than that, i.e. -3 ply. Now, that's absurd, but that's only because the correlation doesn't extrapolate well.
As for the need for a reference, I'm very much in agreement about that, so I've added a fact tag to the statement. It would also be interesting to know how exact the correlation is and how well it extrapolates. -- Jao 20:17, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  From article 

message: Can someone tell me if it is intentional that many if not all of the Wikipedia articles which use the term 'ply' do not use 'plies' as the plural?  i.e.  "forty plies deep" instead of "forty ply deep".  If this is a mistake, feel free to start changing them.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.40.50.1 (talk) 00:48, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: "Plies" is the correct plural term. I don't know of any of the cases you mention, but it depends on the context, i.e. "a search forty plies deep" or "a forty-ply search".  Bubba73 (talk), 01:00, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ply or Plies (Plural) 

message: The opening sentence says "In two-player sequential games, a ply[...]" but I don't see any reason that this would be limited to two-player games.  In a three-player game, the definition would be identical. I think "In multiplayer sequential games" would be better wording.
-SColombo (talk) 19:53, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two player only?
Talk:Web 2.0 Conference (2005)

message: Are the sponsors really relevant information? Does each year warrant a separate Wikipedia entry? I suggest a merge to one article for all occurrences of "Web 2.0 Conference", as other conferences on Wikipedia; such as SIGGRAPH and Game Developers Conference. seriema 14:36, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds reasonable. Artw 18:08, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Marian Woronin

message: Yeah, that's what I thought. Can anyone else confirm that Woronin is the only white man ever to run under 10 dead? Also, where was that - at sea level or Mexico?
~ Paul Murphy ~
:Woronin is the fastest white man over 100 m ever. (One would need to check this list to confirm.) I wouldn't say he ran under 10 s; only official timings count. He set his mark in Warsaw; incidentally, Pietro Mennea ran 10.01 in Ciudad Mexico. Also incidentally, the only non-African to break 10 s over 100 m is Patrick Johnson. GregorB 00:04, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Well not a big change but since all examples of people without an african descent aho broke the 10 second barrier are givenRamil guliyev should also be added to make this article fully informative 31.200.9.240 (talk) 14:18, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ramil Guliyev should be added to examples of people with non-african descent who have broken the 10 second barrier.
Talk:Trauma (comics)

message: Another contributor stated Trauma's alter ego as Terrance Ward. I haven't seen this anywhere. Anyone else have a citation? 
thats his normal name, ward as in "mental ward"
is he a pureblood mutant or turned one? 
the emo label is inappropriate, anyone who has enough guts to face the hulk is considered a warrior in my book
ohh sucks, he got killed,  ohh well he had a good heart, rest in peace dude  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.230.119.210 (talk) 14:09, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It's absolutely ridiculous what they've done with this character. He was a whiny emo teenager, then all of sudden they make him the head therapist in Camp Hammond. How in the hell is is qualified? Then in Avengers: Initiative 26 he says he's an M.F.C.C. (Marriage, Family and Child Counselor). Really? How the hell did he pull that off? Being an M.F.C.C. requires a Masters Degree in counseling or social work. Trauma is a teenager that doesn't even have a college degree. Absolutely bullshit and bad writing, I'm sorry.24.190.34.219 (talk) 19:22, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  How can be he an M.F.C.C.? 

message: The Terrance Ward version of Trauma did not even exist when the Pantheon Saga video game was released in 1996.  Therefore, the version featured in this game had to have been Troh-Mah.
Please stop reverting changes to reflect inaccurate information.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.155.154.126 (talk) 05:05, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Video games 

message: The Trauma page redirects to marvel characters that start with T but under the Trauma part on that page it says main article Trauma (comics) why does it go in a loop?Lordbookworm (talk) 13:58, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect?