lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Royal elections in Poland

message: * Before "free elections" were abolished, 13 were held in Poland, resulting in the elevation of these kings: ... (followed by 14 names!)
* The largest number of participating nobles (40,000–50,000) attended the first free election, in 1573 ... and ... Often close to 100,000 nobles came to those sejms.
Brgds --Wistula (talk) 10:55, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bit unclear 

message: This is definitely B-Class well written article. Kmicic (talk) 19:35, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  B-Class 

message: "While seemingly introducing an very democratic procedure..." No, not even  "seemingly": in the West, an electorate composed solely of nobles can't be construed as "democratic", even where the nobles all stood on an equal footing, which is the essential concept of peers in a peerage. Can this be rethought and rewritten?--Wetman (talk) 18:05, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I see no need to change the wording. Replied here. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 20:59, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Democracy"?
Talk:Gaddafi International Foundation for Charity Associations

message: in the external link? (77.168.179.142 (talk) 13:49, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  who's gina? 

message: their website goes to gina's blog (see above), and there are no current references to them in googleland (at least 6 months, and few within the last year). 
there are several places that have stored earlier versions of their website, but no news on them. anyone know anything? Soosim (talk) 10:10, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  gina, and does this organization exist anymore? 

message: "When asked if Libya would therefore seek reimbursement of the compensation paid to the families of the victims ($2.33 billion in total), Gaddafi replied: "I don't know."[5]"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.220.216.173 (talk) 15:37, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  that 2.33 billion dollars seems just a bit wrong? the source is french, so could someone check it?
Talk:Dale Waters

message: Why would you confuse him with Muddy Waters? Because they have the same last name? That doesn't seem compelling. El cid, el campeador (talk) 15:22, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not to be confused with? 
Talk:White House Military Office

message: I propose that White House Sentries be merged into White House Military Office. I think that the content in the White House Sentries article can easily be explained in the context of White House Military Office, and the White House Military Office article is of a reasonable size that the merging of White House Sentries will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. Jim in Georgia Contribs Talk  22:28, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:David Bavaro

message: Not sure why I got a message accusing me of vandalism. I didn't even know this article existed. I haven't edited any wikipedia articles for a couple years now.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.114.24.178 (talk) 18:34, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism
Talk:Lugton

message: Hello editors,
I moved the title of this page from Lugton and Caldwell to Lugton, rationale being that it is convention to use "PLACENAME" for titles, and there is no placename (or division of land) called Lugton and Caldwell.
That said, I was under the impression that Caldwell was in East Renfrewshire? I'd be inclined to create a Caldwell, East Renfrewhire page, but it may mean moving some of the material from this page to that. Any thoughts? -- Jza84 · (talk) 14:35, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Caldwell 
Talk:Towhidi Tabari

message: No 3rd party sources, only enough info to "justify" an external link, qualifies as spam.  If it isn't spam, please explain here in Talk. Pharmboy (talk) 22:30, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: since it asserts notability, it is not a speedy. He may of may not be notable. I see there was an Under construction tag, which should be respected for 7 days. 
But see the notability criteria for artists--the exhibitions must be proven, and shown to be major. DGG (talk) 01:08, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: At this stage, it does appear to be spam but will wait a week to see what develops before going AFD.  Until then, I would ask the original author try and find something where he is talked about in a known newspaper or something, to establish that he is noteworthy.  I tried but Google shows only 6 hits and none that seem to meet wp:rs or give any details about him.  Can't use his own website as a "reference", as this isn't an objective source.  Pharmboy (talk) 01:40, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wait and see
Talk:Dominique Stevenson

message: Copyright concerns of the collegiate play section raised at the Teahouse Vycl1994 (talk) 17:31, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the section "collegiate play", as a pure copy from this site, which means there's a "hole" in the article. Anyone is free to rewrite, in their own words, a section on his collegiate career. The linked site can be used as a source, but not copied, or even lightly paraphrased.--S Philbrick(Talk) 15:06, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright concerns
Talk:Johnnie B. Rawlinson

message: A temporary subpage at User:Polbot/fjc/Johnnie B. Rawlinson was automatically created by a perl script, based on this article at the Biographical Directory of Federal Judges. The subpage should either be merged into this article, or moved and disambiguated. Polbot (talk) 19:03, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Merged! ElectroChip123 (talk) 05:27, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Bot-created subpage
Talk:Joe Worrall (referee)

message: I have followed all known conventions in submitting this article. I do not own the article of course, but I would be appreciative if you would notify me here or here, explaining rationale if you carry out extensive modification, or indeed if you nominate it for deletion. Ref (chew)(do) 22:32, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Cheesden Valley

message: Anyone know if the John Kay in this article (mill builder) is the same as this fella John Kay (spinning frame)? Parrot of Doom (talk) 22:17, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  John Kay 
Talk:Separation (aeronautics)

message: I've deleted the merged-in conflict section.  It looked like it was written from a hypothetical engineering perspective rather than an ATC perspective ('temporal altitude'... 'flight units'...), and therefore has no real place here.  The narrative about assistants roles and controllers roles was not globalized (to be honest, I think it was either badly translated into English from another language, or was at least 40 yearsout of date, probably both).BaseTurnComplete (talk) 22:38, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

message: What is a "flight unit"? I can't seem to find a definition (even checked Wikipedia!). In the article, "flight unit" refers to some kind of a unit of distance. I think the article would be more useful if this term were defined, perhaps with a link.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by PurpleLobsterNinja (talk • contribs) 22:37, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flight units 

message: On this page, about procedural separation, it is said that the “golden rule“ for horizontal separation of two planes following the same route is a distance in time of 15 minutes. Now for airliners flying at 800 km/h (which is slow), that means a safety distance of 200 km.
But then, there is also the radar separation, for which a common legal value is 5 nautic miles of horizontal distance, that is, 9.3 km. That’s vastly inferior!
What is my misunderstanding here? Does the first rule supersedes the second one for tail-to-head distance (then the second rule would only apply to lateral distance)?
Maëlan 14:58, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Order of magnitude for horizontal separation
Talk:United Kingdom military aircraft registration number

message: *Wikipedia is descriptive not proscriptive (like a dictionary) so it names articles according to principles such as WP:COMMONNAME recognising that what a thing is known as may not be what it is officially, or formally, called.
*For determining what things are called wikipedia looks to what Reliable Sources use, the 'experts' in the field.
*When something is known by more than one name, these alternatives are also included in the article, treated as set out at Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Lead_section#Alternative_names (specifically: "significant alternative names for the topic should be mentioned in the article")
Among the sources cited in this article, at least two refer to the number as"serial" (including Sturtivant, who was well-respected aviation historian, and who is writing for Flight, a reputable magazine ). I can also find instances of the RAF Museum using the term in their Individual Aircraft Histories and public facing website (eg the Lysander in their collection), The CAA, through the G-INFO databases records the history of ex-military aircraft as "serial" (eg entry for G-GAII under "registration mark exemption details" gives Issue date: 21-Jun-2011, Origin: ROYAL NAVY, Code: 861/VL, Serial: XE685" 
There is sufficient evidence to show that "serial" is an often used name for the letter/number combinations carried by British military aircraft. GraemeLeggett (talk) 20:04, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of term "serial" to describe registration numbers
Talk:Second Thai–Lao Friendship Bridge

message: I removed  the sentence "The bridge is open only to cars, trucks and buses. No other vehicles or pedestrians are allowed to cross." as it's unreferenced. I removed it rather than add a  tag as I know it's incorrect (I've personally cycled across; motorcycles may also cross). It's not permitted to cross on foot, but I don't have a reference for that. 58.8.212.156 (talk) 12:50, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Vehicle/pedestrian restrictions
Talk:Jessica Aguirre

message: DISCLAIMER:  I didn't write the article, so if anything I write, here, seems like apologia, it's not because I have any skin in this game.  I simply have an opinion, and here it is...
She's the news anchor on the NBC-owned TV station (channel 3 on most area cable systems, and channel 11 over the air) here in the San Francisco Bay area; and before that she was anchoring for years on the Bay area's ABC-owned network station (channel 7), and she's quite good at her job.  Seriously... very, very good.  
With regard to the notability notice/earning box at the top of the article (as of this writing on 3 July 2012), I've seen far less notable people with articles here, and no one questions those.  She's very well-known in the Bay area; and should probably not have questioned that she has a Wikipedia article... though that's just my opinion, mind you.
The article has two huge problems, though...
First, it seems like its text was lifted from her bio on the website of whatever TV station at which she was working when whomever lifted it so lifted.  Someone who's part of the power structure around here should get into his/her "talk" area an warn him/her that that's now how to write a Wikipedia article.  So, right out of the gate, if this article is to stay on Wikipedia, it needs to stop reading like her bio from her employer's website.
Second, there have been things that happened in her life which have made the news, and so should be in the article.  I'm having trouble remembering any of them at the moment, of course, but I remember a few things.  One thing, for example (that I just remembered while typing this) was that she got some kind of facial plastic surgery or something which shocked her fans.  It wasn't horrific, or anything; I mean, she's still pretty and stuff.  But critics say it definitely didn't improve anything, as I'm sure she was hoping.  That's, of course, not a huge thing, but I did just think of it.  I know there's other stuff, though.  Someone should hunt it down and add it.
But the whole piece, seriously, has got to stop reading like boilerplate bio text.  Ugh!  If only that got fixed, it would improve the article 100%! 
Gregg L. DesElms (Username: Deselms) 00:47, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, horribly written. i ahve added some refs, and removed a proposed deletion. If anyone feels she is not notable, it can go to AFD now. maybe that will help it along.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 20:46, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Written too much like an employer's website bio
Talk:Cotswold Gliding Club

message: Please correct any errors or omissions you spot on this page.  Club members are obviously in the best position to do this; but comments & corrections are welcome from any user.
If you're unfamiliar with editing, just leave a note here or drop me a line on my Talk page. --NigelG (or Ndsg) | Talk 11:39, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing this page 

message: Thanks are due to George Timbrell for bringing to our attention—& physically locating—the S&G article by David Roberts. --NigelG (or Ndsg) | Talk 21:20, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  1980 auction 

message: I've reduced the external Blokarting links to one: Blokarters UK.  Three links seemed too much for what is, after all, a gliding club! --NigelG (or Ndsg) | Talk 18:22, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blokarting  links 
Talk:Cheap

message: Erm, cheap != miser. In Australia at least it means low price.
What's the story with the redirect? --15.219.233.71 (talk) 22:59, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Until someone has a better article, cheap can redirect to miser.  I was working on video game culture articles, but I can't find a better source for a "Cheap tactics" or "cheap characters" term then urbandictionary.
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=cheap
Mathiastck (talk) 20:02, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Template talk:Types of tools

message: Umm... why the HECK is "fingernail" a cutting tool!?!? Wizard of Yendor (talk) 23:00, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. Ruyn (talk) 21:57, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: So, a saw, a scalpel and a scissors are cutting tools, while a hacksaw and a hand saw are hand tools? Seems a little odd. Maybe a different method of organization might be appropriate here? —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 09:24, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hand tools vs cutting tools 

message: Where would soldering irons/guns fit into this?  Yes, they are electric/butane powered, but they don't have motors and only use their power source for heat, not to drive a motor... 69.179.153.23 (talk) 05:00, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Soldering Irons/Guns 

message: User:70.165.18.84, you said that an auger is "not a post hole digger", and then I realized that you're probably picturing clamshell diggers (the hand tool), and that's fine, but just FYI, where I come from, PTO-driven augers and clamshell diggers are both also called "post hole diggers", because they both dig post holes. — ¾-10 00:46, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Augers and clamshell diggers are both called "post hole diggers" 

message: Grammar — Wrapped in Grey (talk) 14:18, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename to Types of tool 

message: The Ice resurfacer seems out of place on the list as it is the only vehicle.  Is there a reason it is listed and not any construction vehicles? Thetrueluckyone (talk) 18:37, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: This template is one of the most useless random rag-bags of any navigation template. The scope is too broad to ever work. Andy Dingley (talk) 18:39, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  ice resurfacer?
Talk:Manchester University Press

message: Previous version gave 40 years which would run until 1944: however Tait's tenure ended in 1919 and Tout's in 1925. H. M. McKechnie was secretary to the press from 1912-1949: for the professors concerned the Calendar would need to be consulted.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 07:38, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Professors of History
Talk:Multiflow

message: It needs to be repaired.  Well intended, but pointing to another part of the Yale/New Haven area. 143.232.210.150 (talk) 20:36, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: ELI link is wrong

message: This article gives me the impression of praising a failed startup, no names of the influential people it mentioned is provided.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.92.194.225 (talk) 22:29, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tone of article 

message: University of Maryland College Park astronomy department purchased a 7/ around '85-'87.  It was used for reducing data from the BIMA millimeter interferometer.
192.249.47.176 (talk) 19:06, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  UMD
Talk:Atlas (computer)

message: This machine wasn't called the "Atlas Computer", it was called "Atlas". Hence I propose a rename to Atlas (computer). --Malleus Fatuorum 23:33, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur. As a Computer Science student in Manchester, I used Atlas between 1969 and 1971 and it was always called just "Atlas" and never ever the "Atlas Computer".109.155.177.114 (talk) 19:27, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed renaming 

message: Removed the following "reference" which was just in-line text.
ref The 64-bit Stretch did floating-point addition in 1.38-1.5 microseconds, and multiplication in 2.48-2.70 microseconds, compared to the 48-bit Atlas's floating-point addition in 1.6-2.6 microseconds and multiplication in 4.97 microseconds.ref109.155.177.114 (talk) 19:50, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: When is a reference not a reference?

message: COMPUTERS and AUTOMATION, 196311.pdf, pp. 38-39
Digital_Computer_Newsletter October 1960 and October 1961 --89.25.210.104 (talk) 22:16, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible references 

message: Atlas is primarily notable for being the first machine with virtual memory, something which was quickly copied by almost all other leading-edge systems (although it took a while for IBM to get the message). Virtual memory is now ubiquitous (down to smart phones, I expect); it's a hugely important development. Atlas' successful use of it was widely noted in the field, and led to its quick, wide, adoption. Other than that, Atlas would be just one more early large computer. So keep the virtual memory point prominent in the description - it should always be the first thing mentioned after saying what Atlas was. Noel (talk) 12:24, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Template talk:TibetanBuddhism

message: This template needs some work. Everything is thrown in in a jumble. Let's think about adding some organization. Curious Blue (talk) 23:03, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. I'm just going to go straight ahead and edit.Aero13792468 (talk) 20:23, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: What is the criteria (if any) for a figure being included in the list of "key figures"? While there are many important figures there are many others who really don't match any sensible definition of that term - they are all jumbled together and the list grows ever longer. Perhaps on this page (or a sub page specifically for the purpose) people could cite a couple of reliable sources and give reasons why a figure should be on that list. Meanwhile I'm tempted to prune that list to a more manageable and useful size. Chris Fynn (talk) 07:03, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Key figures
Talk:Manchester Central Mosque

message: One part of the website seems to show that the site for the Mosque was first established in the 1900s as stated in the article http://www.manchestermosque.org/index.php/main-prayer-area
While the homepage appears to say that the Mosque started in the 1950s
http://www.manchestermosque.org/ 
Was this two Mosques coming together?
	--Russell's teapot (talk) 16:23, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Confusing history
Talk:Jacqui Ainsley

message: Hey! I think some work needs to be done on sourcing. Her personal website seems to be non-existent and that seems to be where the majority of the information is coming from. Bali88 (talk) 20:04, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: sourcing
Talk:Oprichnik

message: what is this "Novgorod incident" listed in this article? I am considering removing it until more information on it is known. 71.169.32.164 (talk)
    The article on the Oprichnina is a little less emotive.  
The reference here to the KGB is unnecessarily strained, although Eisenstein made the link in the second part of his film biography of Ivan.  Russians have contested the image of Ivan ever since his death, which is why writing about him was potentially dangerous during the forty years after the Russian Revolution.
Well, when I was reading this I immediately thought of the NKVD and the KGB. I mean these thugs were the secret police, weren't they? Amazing that Russia has had such a long history of this type of terror. You'd think they would have had enough by now.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.138.91.70 (talk) 09:51, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Luis Cálix (soccer, born 1988)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved. (non-admin closure) Adumbrativus (talk) 18:25, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Luis Cálix (footballer, born 1988) →  – per WP:NCSP Joeykai (talk) 17:28, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 20 February 2022
Talk:Trillium stamineum

message: It would seem there is a variation of reported appearance for this species. There may be more than one variety, with some having more red flowers and others more chocolate flowers. Some are reported shorter and some taller.I listed 2 sources which vary in their description and left out several other sources. Trilobitealive (talk) 02:59, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Variation of reported appearance
Talk:Yoji Akao

message: Simplysavvy (talk) 13:15, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
Talk:Jewel Akens

message: It seems like the Eddie Daniels reference link indicated in this entry is actually linking to a totally different person than the one who sang with Jewel Akens. In fact, I just contacted him and he has confirmed he has nothing to with Jewel Akens.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.37.217.4 (talk) 17:17, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.rockabilly.nl/references/messages/jewel_akens.htm. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Diannaa (talk) 00:34, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Hinds Community College

message: Just because an advocacy organization is involved in the speech issue (2010) does not mean it needs to be covered in this article. There is no third-party RS, and it does not seem that notable - little to no followup. Let's not weight these articles down.Parkwells (talk) 19:57, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Recommend deleting speech issue