Talk:Marchantiophyta

message: This page should say how many species are found in the division.
:That information is on the page (at least it is now). --EncycloPetey 20:06, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Number of species

message: I have added a number of in-line references to this article.  I expect its quality scale rating could be reconsidered as a result. --EncycloPetey 20:06, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References and Rating

message: Well done! I have passed this article as a Good Article. Overall, the article was well written, the images were great, and the sources especially well chosen. However, a few things should be addressed before heading onto the road to FA status:
#The statement in the lead "Some species can be a nuisance in shady green-houses" seems out of place. Maybe it could be moved to Ecology or Economic importance? Also, can you be more specific on the "some species" part?
#The section "Economic importance" deals very little with actual economic importance. I suggest something like "Human importance" be used instead. If you continue to expand this section, I suggest using subsections to separate the history paragraph from the human impact and uses paragraph.
#Additionally, the part about liverworts reducing erosion and such should at least have some sort of source.
#The Ecology section is a little scarce. Perhaps you could explain the importance of Marchantiophyta in an ecosystem.
#The last few statements in the "Life cycle" subsection are uncited. If you could cite them, that would be great.
Other than those specific points mentioned, if you'd like to FA this, you're going to have to expand a lot. Again, good job, and I hope to see this article sometime in FA nominations. bibliomaniac15 20:53, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA review

message: This is a bit of a conumdrum. There seem to be two identifications for the division of the Liverworts, and the option of Liverwort on the title is blocked by the page 'Liverwort', really a bit of a disambiguation. I suggest this page is removed, and the fact of the use of liverwort to name a flower type, could be in the introduction. No disambiguation should be necessary.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by WikieWikieWikie (talk • contribs) 22:54, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No, the disambiguation is necessary because there is more than one meaning for the word 'liverwort'.  That is what disambiguation pages are for. --EncycloPetey (talk) 15:22, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Liverwort on the title

message: On the Moss Wikipedia page, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moss it discusses how the liverworts and hornworts were formerly classified under Bryophyta.  Should there be some discussion on why they were reclassified?Elleacampbell (talk) 15:29, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That information is already in the article.  Under the Classification header are two paragraphs discussing this. --EncycloPetey (talk) 15:35, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Liverworts formerly of bryrophyta

message: I wonder whether some examples of use by humans could be given to the following: 
"However, a few species are used by humans directly. A few species, such as Riccia fluitans, are aquatic thallose liverworts sold for use in aquariums."
Does this mean that the only economic use by humans is in aquariums? Dawright12 (talk) 11:39, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It depends on how broadly you want to stretch the term "economic".  Liverworts are occasinoally used as bioindicators in ecological studies, and have been cultured for scientific investigation of their genomes, but these are highly technical scientific uses with no direct impact on the economy.  There is some potential in liverworts as sources of pesticide, but I've not seen any use made of that potential, so again no actual economic impact.  I've also seen some anecdotal mentions of liverwort use in traditional Chinese medicine, but do not have sources to properly support this. --EncycloPetey (talk) 14:55, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Economic Importance

message: I had a little issue with some contradictory information within this section. It states here that liverworts produce a protonema, however when you enter the link to protonema it clearly stares that liverworts DO NOT have a pronto email stage. I am no expert and would appreciate if someone could set the record straight here. Thanks
----  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gillyjilly (talk • contribs) 11:44, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Life cycle  

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Marchantiophyta. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050323090944/http://www2.una.edu/pdavis/hepatic_orders.htm to http://www2.una.edu/pdavis/hepatic_orders.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050413214451/http://www.bio.ilstu.edu/armstrong/syllabi/222book/chapt6.htm to http://www.bio.ilstu.edu/armstrong/syllabi/222book/chapt6.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051025142835/http://www.bio.umass.edu/biology/conn.river/liverwts.html to http://www.bio.umass.edu/biology/conn.river/liverwts.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050303043539/http://www.hcs.ohio-state.edu/hcs300/liver1.htm to http://www.hcs.ohio-state.edu/hcs300/liver1.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:22, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Marchantiophyta. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120426065619/http://database.portal.modwest.com/item.php?table=citation&id=1392 to http://database.portal.modwest.com/item.php?table=citation&id=1392
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070831024018/http://www.biology.duke.edu/bryology/LiToL/ to http://www.biology.duke.edu/bryology/LiToL/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:30, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Marchantiophyta. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120724050605/http://www.hriresearch.org/docs/publications/JEH/JEH_2006/JEH_2006_24_4/JEH%2024-4-230-236.pdf to http://www.hriresearch.org/docs/publications/JEH/JEH_2006/JEH_2006_24_4/JEH%2024-4-230-236.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:58, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: When I hover over the Cambrian period symbol (2nd from the left) at the top of the side-image, I see a popup that says "The Cambrian period ( or )...". The "( or )" doesn't look right, probably a bug makes it not be able to show correctly the Cambrian wiki entry's content in the parentheses  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:2149:8806:E400:30EC:7872:16CD:26B1 (talk) 12:39, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cambrian period popup 

message: The link to the gallery in top section doesn’t work - it seems to go somewhere else. I don’t know how to fix it 174.93.163.189 (talk) 21:55, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to gallery not working