Talk:Republic of China Navy

message: I was wondering if anyone had any objections to organizing the list of ships in the fleet into a table similar to the aircraft in the interest of clarity and saving space? Example below. -Loren 07:03, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tables for ships? 

message: "Aircraft" not "aircrafts", please. John Smith's (talk) 10:05, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Grammar

message: In the tables that list the various aircraft, missiles, etc and anon-IP editor has changed upper case descriptions to lower case ones. For example "maritime patrol aircraft" instead of "Maritime patrol aircraft". I personally prefer upper case, so unless anyone has strong objections I will change them over when I have the time. Otherwise please leave your views here. 
Furthermore I agree with Loren's proposal above. I don't like the colour of the current table, nor the fact it's separated. I'll look into carrying out the work when possible. John Smith's (talk) 20:18, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Upper or lower case and general style

message: I disagree with removing that information. Saying when something will be completed is not the same as saying its currently under construction. So I will revert its omission to restore that piece of  information.Giovanni33 (talk) 23:52, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: In that case it's also misleading to say 30 are under construction, as they're not. I am changing the entry accordingly. John Smith's (talk) 00:08, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: under construction

message: This editor has been removing wikilinks from all three ROC military pages with no explanation. I have reverted his latest changes as vandalism - please be on the look-out. If he does it again, please report him. John Smith's (talk) 12:44, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits by 24.85.227.16‎  

message: I have restored the flags because Pyl's justification in removing them is invalid - there is no "flag convention". There is a MoS that makes suggestions over how they can be used, but I do not see anything that contradicts their use here.
He has complained that:
# The flags make the article difficult to read.
# These tables do not fall into the MoS guidelines.
# It is confusing to use the ROC flag with the word "Taiwan".
I would respond as thus:
# The flags do not make the article difficult to read and actually enhance the tables, making the origins easier to identify.
# The MoS gives suggestions, not a finite number of examples, as to when flags can be used. Again, a MoS is not binding and there appropriate people can make their own styles.
# It is not confusing at all, because Taiwan is a well known location. On the other hand "Republic of China" is highly confusing. Having "Taiwan" is thus a lot better and as the flag is flown on the island there's no reason not to use it.
On another note I am trimming the arms discussion as most of it is not relevant to the navy. John Smith's (talk) 18:37, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of flags 

message: New infobox for the article. add details as required and remove the <nowiki> tag before posting --Wanders1 (talk) 12:33, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New infobox 

message: An image used in this article, File:Rocn.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 19 May 2012 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Rocn.png)
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 10:10, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Rocn.png Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:National Anthem of the Republic of China which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 19:28, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: The article lists both Hai Shih submarines as Tench-class. However, one of them, the former USS Tusk (SS-426), is actually Balao-class. -- 188.194.254.195 (talk) 14:30, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hai Shih class submarines: One Tench, one Balao 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Republic of China Navy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20141218232032/http://au.news.yahoo.com/070912/19/14evg.html to http://au.news.yahoo.com/070912/19/14evg.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:27, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Republic of China Navy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721171931/https://www.dsca.osd.mil/PressReleases/36-b/2010/Taiwan_09-39.pdf to http://www.dsca.osd.mil/PressReleases/36-b/2010/Taiwan_09-39.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721171945/https://www.dsca.osd.mil/PressReleases/36-b/2010/Taiwan_09-37.pdf to http://www.dsca.osd.mil/PressReleases/36-b/2010/Taiwan_09-37.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120425062706/http://163.29.207.53/MNANew/Internet/NewsDetail.aspx?GUID=62890 to http://163.29.207.53/MNANew/Internet/NewsDetail.aspx?GUID=62890
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:18, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Cheng Kung-class frigates were locally built in Taiwan not second hand purchased from the US, there is a entire wiki page about that.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.199.203.79 (talk) 06:02, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cheng Kung-class frigates