lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of PlayStation 3 games (A–C)

message: Some of the games listed here are digital only - like Jurassic Park  01:46, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Digital only games listed here 

message: This page has 422,365 bytes of wiki-markup. What's the best way to split it? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:05, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page size 

message: There was a very useful table containing a list of PS3 games playable in 3D. But now, when trying to open that list I get redirected to this wiki of general games for PS3. Moreover, this actual list supposedly includes games with 3D available, but it only shows less than 10 games, and the previous wiki there was around 100 games. Also that list included more useful information about the 3D. 
**Is a big loss of information**. Link that pointed to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_3D_PlayStation_3_games should be restored instead redirected to this generic list of all games. 46.6.238.174 (talk) 02:46, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: This won't be restore. Multiple project consensuses have resulted in such sublists being merged into the primary list. -- ferret (talk) 02:49, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The information is lost. I agree that it is good to merge the sublists in one, but on the list there were much more games with 3D. It should be nice if somebody reviews that old list and mark all the games appearing on the new main list. 93.176.132.60 (talk) 19:46, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of PS3 Stereoscopic 3D games is lost
Talk:Breakbeat Koas (record label)

message: From WP:RfD:
* Breakbeat Koas (record label) → Breakbeat Kaos (record label) Corrected misspelled title.  Redirect is simply the misspelling. Corrected misspellings on all other pages so nothing links to misspelled redirect. –DeweyQ 16:22, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Psycology

message: From WP:RfD:
* Psycology -> Psychology - Author keeps creating/reverting this page, containing only offensive text. Ec5618 14:12, May 9, 2005 (UTC)
** I protected it and put a {vprotected} notice on it for the moment. Noel (talk) 19:04, 9 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sunrise (television)

message: From WP:RfD:
* Sunrise (television) → Sunrise (television program)
* Sunrise (Australian TV show) → Sunrise (television program)
* Sunrise is an Australian morning television program broadcasted on the Seven Network. People should search for "Sunrise" and find the page Sunrise. There is a link here that will take them to Sunrise (television program). People will not enter the search terms "Sunrise (television)" and "Sunrise (Australian TV show)". Ianblair23 23:57, 9 May 2005 (UTC)
Talk:King's Quest VIII: The Mask of Eternity

message: I don't think Etheria vs. Realm of the Sun is an inconsistency at all. There is no indication in the games of where Eldritch is in relation to Daventry. I have removed the statement that Etheria is shown above Daventry in the KQVII intro since that isn't true. I have delayed any further excisions. If no justification is given I will remove that statement from the article completely. Eric119 02:25, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Inconsistencies
Talk:Golden Dawn (Greece)

message: Unfortunately the Golden Dawn is not a former political party, the court's sentence does not affect it legality as a party (if the party self-disbands or is unable to renew due to lack of support because of it, is another matter): 
From: https://edition.cnn.com/2020/10/07/europe/golden-dawn-guilty-leadership-intl
--Dereck Camacho (talk) 03:55, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, this is true, I have updated the article and give the following source: https://www.in.gr/2020/10/14/politics/xrysi-aygi-egklimatiki-symmoria-sti-fylaki-dikaioma-symmetoxis-stis-ekloges/.  — Orgyn (talk) 14:51, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

text: Do you have a reliable source stating this explicitly? — The Hand That Feeds You:Bite 14:24, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Former political party 

message: The infobox shows them as having been banned, but they're also being included in recent opinion polls. Just trying to be sure Nevermore27 (talk) 21:06, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed that line from the infobox, its a misunderstanding. Long story short is that Michaloliakos et all were convicted of a variety of criminal acts, but legally speaking that was unrelated to Golden Dawn the political party. I removed Category:Organized crime groups in Greece for the same reason. --RaiderAspect (talk) 13:00, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The opening paragraph still contains the word "banned" as a definitional buzzword. I was confused, because there is no mention of them being legally banned from political involvement anywhere in the article. I am going to remove that from the page. Also just a site note, the word order in the sentence also reads unnatural. I was going to rearrange it so that it reads like idiomatic English but I guess I will just remove the word "banned" Pomodecon (talk) 20:52, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Were they banned? 

message: I completely disagree with this edit, because the new wording is much more confusing to anyone unfamiliar with NYC. Simply saying "Astoria, New York, and Tarpon Springs, Florida" would be the best solution, IMO. — The Hand That Feeds You:Bite 11:57, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Astoria is not a city, though; it is a neighborhood in Queens, New York City, New York.  What if we just say "New York City, New York, and Tarpon Springs, Florida"? Joesom333 (talk) 19:37, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd be fine with that. — The Hand That Feeds You:Bite 14:12, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing edit.
Talk:Boethius

message: Hi all -- I noticed that an anonymous editor added Ignatius Reilly to the "Influenced" section in the infobox.  Because Ignatius Reilly is a fictional character from the novel A Confederacy of Dunces, and not a real philosopher, I removed it.  In that novel, however, Boethius is mentioned very frequently, being the favorite philosopher of Ignatius Reilly, the main character.  I'm now thinking that since A Confederacy of Dunces is a Pulitzer-prize winning classic novel, the factoid of Boethius being prominent in the book could go in a new "In popular culture" section.  What do you think? -- Cloud atlas (talk) 05:35, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I went ahead and added the section.  Please do help improve it. -- Cloud atlas (talk) 05:57, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  In popular culture 

message: Boethius is indeed a saint according to the 2004 (latest edition) Roman Martyrology:
6*. Papiae in Liguria, commemoratio sancti Severini Boetii, martyris, qui, scientia ac scriptis praeclarus, in carcere detentus tractatum scripsit de consolatione philosophiae et Deo usque ad mortem a Theodorico rege inflictam cum integritate servivit.
He is also mentioned as "Saint Severino Boezio" on the calendar based on the 2004 Roman Martyrology here: http://www.gcatholic.org/saints/data/martyrology2004-10c.htm#d23
It seems some people thought he was not a saint because they used old editions of Roman Martyrology, so make sure to check using the 2004 Roman Martyrology because that is the latest edition.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.174.156.228 (talk) 14:00, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boethius is actually a saint. 

message: The image placement in the article is killing me. I cannot tell on my screen where to actually format the images, and when I do, they are in a completely different place. If someone could help me on this, it would be greatly appreciated. GuardianH (talk) 20:20, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image placement
Talk:Richard Salter Storrs

message: *I feel there is a typing mistatke in years 1331-1836, I have corrected that to 1831-1836. Further confirmation is requested.--Bhadani 02:47, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: See s:1911 Encyclopædia Britannica/Storrs, Richard Salter. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 17:36, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Brian Engblom

message: This is humour writing and doesn't have a place in an encyclopedia. It also makes sweeping statements without attribution. Unless it is cleaned up I'm going to remove it.  Valsorim (talk) 00:36, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Mullet
Talk:Gallery of sovereign state flags/Archive 1

message: I have added the Flag of Kurdistan, which is no doubt a national Flag. But there might be a discussion about adding it to this page, because Kurdistan is not a seperate state. This list and the corresponding gallery look more like a List of flags of sovereign states which I think is something different. Erdal Ronahi 10:42, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kurdistan 

message: Out of curiosity, why does this page have flags of England, Scotland, and Wales, but not Northern Ireland?
--Jfruh 21:26, 4 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Northern Ireland? 

message: The current version shows the discarded coalition design for the Flag of Iraq. I'm pretty sure this has been rejected and the old ref green and black flag remains in place. Could someone please change the images? (I'd do it myself but am not sure how to.) We've got a number of illustrations of the proper flag in the flag of Iraq article Lisiate 02:06, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flag of Iraq
Talk:Rogie Vachon

message: I read somewhere on a hockey website that Rogie is the brother of famous wrestlers Paul "The Butcher" and Maurice "Mad Dog" Vachon. Any truth to that?--Krazyj2010 (talk) 16:09, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Vachon?
Talk:Michel Larocque

message: I had put Michel Larocque (ice hockey) in the "See also" because he is a different player with the same name. Masterhatch 14:55, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Does anyone know how he got his nickname?  2607:FEA8:10E0:1C00:25DA:D414:C0F8:964B (talk) 21:18, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Bunny
Talk:Penfolds Grange

message: Grange is shiraz-based, but differing amounts of cabernet are added year to year.
The title of this article should be changed to "Penfolds Grange."  Can somebody do that, please?144.132.194.134 11:25, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Reads like it was written directly by their marketing department. Steve.Moulding 23:50, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Appeal 

message: I know it's not great, but it's a start... :-) FlagSteward 17:50, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo
Talk:Ronald Wright

message: What on Earth is 'pornology'?  www.Dictionary.com has no results for it, I'm sure there must be a misspelling there.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.153.60.200 (talk) 03:55, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pornology 

message: I have just this minute finished listening to his 2004 Massey Lecture "A Brief History of Progress".  
I am deeply impressed.  The breadth and depth of his understanding and vision are truly profound for the species if not the planet in the short term (geologically speaking).  It is (and no "perhaps" required) the most important non-fiction work (of any discipline) I have ever read or (listened to) and every naked ape on the planet should have a chance to do so - our very existence depends on it (and no "may" required either). Please spread the word! The more info on him here the better.  Please contribute as I can find little info and no personal home page for this exceptional writer and intellectual. Mattjs 12:49, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There are better links to the first Massey Lecture on A Short History of Progress without the permaculture segment intro although I found the permaculture bit was a learning experience and I like having a link here I am not sure!? Mattjs 15:33, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please Contribute
Talk:ESPN Sunday Night Football

message: Options:
#momentary article (until the name of the NBC Sports program is disclosed): NBC Sunday Night Football
#article about The NFL on NBC, which would include the period before The NFL on CBS
2004-12-29T22:45Z 05:50, May 26, 2005 (UTC)
Anyone object to moving this to NFL Sunday Night Football with redirects from both ESPN Sunday Night Football and Sunday Night Football? -- Robster2001 01:47, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[The NFL on NBC]] 
Talk:Granholm v. Heald

message: Basically a great article, but, law buffs, when you can, please explain the names of the litigants if they are not self-explanatory when writing a court case article, if you have access to this information.  Even more detail would be good, such as whether the case involved the person per se or ex officio.  (For example, "Baker" in Baker v. Carr was a voter and hence suing per se; "Carr" was Secretary of State for Tennessee and was sued ex officio as the state official responsible for enforcing voting laws, publishing maps of voting districts, and the like.)  Rlquall 04:14, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion header

message: The [Ref] links in the last section of the article are broken.
The Consequences section says that Michigan joined 15 other states that do not allow any direct shipping to consumers. According to the Wine Institute, 37 states allow at least some form of direct shipping. These claims contradict each other since that comes out to more than 50 (or 51 with D.C.) states.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Q1w2e3r4t5y6u7 (talk • contribs) 10:31, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problems
Talk:USS Rasher

message: I'm reading Red Scorpion now. It says the Rasher had GM engines, not Fairbanks-Morse. I'd be inclined to believe that, as the author's father was an engineering officer on the Rasher, and the text even describes the procedure for changing out the exhaust valves in some detail. Rees11 (talk) 02:25, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Engines
Talk:Sicilian Defence

message: A new article called Sicilian Defense, Classical Variation should be created. The Sicilian Defense article is too long.
- HappyMouse2 (talk) 02:31, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: just do it! – ishwar  (speak) 04:08, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

text: The Sicilian Defence is one of the most frequently played and important openings in chess. It's article should be long. The current draft article doesn't look ready for wikipedia yet. Besides the "Classical Variation" isn't so much a variation as a move order; Black is refusing to commit to the Najdorf or Scheveningen or Dragon, but retains transposition possibilities for all three. You're more likely to find a book on the "Richter Rauzer Variation" or "Sozin Variation" than the "Classical Variation". MaxBrowne2 (talk) 22:42, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Regarding the last point, that's not really true: the transpositions are not all that common in practice, and since the 1990s, I think it's safe to say there have been more books written on the Classical in general than on any of its specific branches. But you are of course right regarding the stub that was created. We could use a fork on the Classical, but someone actually needs to first write the content that would justify creating the fork. Cobblet (talk) 02:39, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  New article: Sicilian Defence, Classical Variation 

message: In "Other moves" section there is this statement: "Wilhelm Steinitz played 2.e5 at least three times in tournament play, defeating Szymon Winawer, Max Weiss, and Celso Golmayo Zúpide" and it is referenced by https://chesstempo.com/game-database.html, however this database doesn't contain any of these games. There are some transpositions from French defense though (1.e4 e6 2.e5 c5), but I don't think that counts. I tried searching games in other databases, but failed. So what should we do about it? Deltaspace42 (talk) 09:32, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: More than one year later, I have decided to be bold and I've just removed this statement. Deltaspace42 (talk • contribs) 12:47, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  2. e5 games by Steinitz 

message: Thank you for finding a source for the use of "?!" here.  But now you must cite it!  See WP:CITE if you are unsure how to do this. Bruce leverett (talk) 04:07, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  6. Nxc6 

message: Makes sense, anyway, more likely that a reader wanting to read about the Sicilian Defence: Najdorf Variation will go to Sicilian Defence WinnerWinnerChickenDinne (talk) 00:37, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Sicilian Defence: Najdorf Variation into Sicilian Defence
Talk:Downgrade

message: I changed the tag on this article from Split to Wikify.  It may actually need to be moved to Wiktionary.  While different fields use the term downgrade, they all use it in essentially the same way.  Thus it would be better to make one article on downgrading or move it to Wiktionary. -Acjelen 04:27, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, transwiki is probably appropriate. Practically nothing links here anyway. I'm changing the tag from Wikify to move. Jeeves 04:15, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Purpose of this article

message: I've noticed a lost of TV channels have notes for the resolution similar to this "HD feed downgraded to letterboxed 480i for SD feed". Should this be used that way in a TV channel Infobox? I've changed it for Cartoon Network to simply read 480i letterbox for SDTV feed. I think the rest should be changed as well. Other than those, I've never seen the use of "downgrade" for video formats.MexTDT (talk) 19:41, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of downgrade for video?
Talk:Hyundai Pony

message: Interesting choice of mentor, I would have thought... :D --Samf-nz 05:24, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: British Leyland
Talk:Bachelor party

message: If you wish to justify removal (or inclusion) of images, please don't try to use a discussion that petered out 6 years ago - and resulted in that image being left in anyway.
Whilst there are many different customs and activities associated with Bachelor parties, hazing and singling out of the bachelor is pretty common to all varieties - this image shows that.  Chaheel Riens (talk) 17:06, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images
Talk:List of people from Salt Lake City

message: I'm sorry, how exactly is Brigham Young a resident of Salt Lake City? Is it really conventional to describe the deseased as residents? Perhaps a separate section for former important residents who have passed on is needed. Sabine's Sunbird 04:30, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:John Schofield

message: In writing my thesis on Thomas I was unable to find any evidence that Schofield was the author of the New York Tribune letter and was the man behind the One who fought at Nashville. It is likely he played a role in it due to his rivalry with Thomas, but it doesn't appear he actually wrote it. I did find two sources that identified General Jacob D. Cox, who fought under Schofield as a corps commander at Nashville, as the actual author. The best source I found is Dennis Belcher's General David S. Stanley, USA: A Civil War Biography page 232. As such, I'm going to remove the statement on the letter and role in Thomas' death because it can't be verified. Nerovingian (talk) 15:36, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Letter criticizing Thomas

message: The Medal of Honor, per Wikipedia's own article, was not issued to officers until 1891. In fact, Schofield's MoH citation indicates it was awarded on 2 July 1892. Not that it matters or that anyone cares, but genealogical records indicate I may be a 2nd cousin, five times removed, of the General. Duckecho 04:46, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Medal of Honor

message: For those who care about these information boxes, I think an inappropriate one was selected in this case. Schofield's contribution to history is significantly more important as a general than his brief tenure as secretary of war. For some other generals, such as George Marshall, I would agree, but not in Schofield's case. Hal Jespersen 21:26, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: box?

message: I worked on this article while waiting for my laptop to download and install updates(the first 2tries failed but I hope this latest works). I don't claim a military background and have not reviewed the latest book, but hope I have improved it somewhat. I don't have time for further work on it and hope others can take up the flag, so as to speak.Jweaver28 (talk) 16:35, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  more work needed 
Talk:Japanese icebreaker Shirase (AGB-5002)

message: Its Shirase, not Shiraze. Saintjust 05:16, 26 May 2005 (UTC)

message: Sea vessels are routinely called "she" in English.  I think the change to "it" reads awkwardly.  So I reverted it.  
Cheers!  Geo Swan (talk) 08:40, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  revert  -- see talk 
Talk:Later Hōjō clan

message: The following content was moved from the article to the Talk page:
The Late Hojo clan is a modern day clan, formed in the U.S., that follows the teachings of a leader, whose traditional name would be Mido.  This is because the leader of the Kokiri was Mido.  There are different clans, the Late Hojo being one of them, each with a similar belief system- that of the triforce.  They believe that Din, the goddess of power, formed the earth, Ferore, the goddess of courage, made all life, and Nayru, created law that would guide the people.  Most try to remain secretive, but if you see a person with a triforce (3 triangles) on their hand then they are most likely part of one of these clans.  The creation of the hojo clan took place shortly after the realease of the Nintendo 64 game, The legend of Zelda, Ocarina of time.  Each clan usually has a language, which could be anything from a cipher from the English language, or an entire different language, with its own symbols.  Some clans also require their followers to prove themselves by participating in events that could lead to death or serious injury and others are just open clans, letting friends of clan members in. (Unsigned, undated)
:::What is this? Is this serious? LordAmeth 13:15, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I would assume is the editor is making an elaborate joke based on the fact that the Hōjō Clan's mon looks identical to the Triforce of the Legend of Zelda video game/ entertainment franchise (where is serves as a recurring MacGuffin and religious symbol). But, maybe it is a real Zelda cult called Hōjō to be tongue-in-cheek. Who can say. Also, sorry to answer you seven years too late. Hope its not been eating away at you. Mr. G. Williams (talk) 21:14, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is there any evidence that this Later Hojo clan used the same triforce emblem as the older Hojo clan? This should be either sourced or removed. SSBDelphiki (talk) 09:15, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hojo emblem?