lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Cooee

message: That a call from the Dardanelles poster would be a good addition to this article if someone can find an image of it. --Ptcamn 22:26, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Has anyone ever commented on the similarity between the cooee and the traditional American hog-call? Aside from the beginning consonant, they sound almost identical. Is it due to the constraints imposed by the need to be heard over long distances, is it part of some older tradition of long-distance calling, or is it just a coincidence? Chuck Entz (talk) 07:27, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cooee and Sooee &#47; Sooie &#47; Sooey 

message: The call coo-ee is also mentioned in D.H. Lawrence's Novel Lady Chatterley's Lover. Connie and her husband Clifford use it while they are on a walk in the park. It is mentioned to be a ritual from their earlier happy days. --Stilfehler (talk) 00:56, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lady Chatterley's Lover
Talk:Extension tube

message: I ran accross extenders when taking a look at the canon website , but when I tried to find the wikipedia article I couldn't find anything, anywhere, about an "extender". Is it the same thing as an extension tube? It looks like it, but being totally unfamiliar with either I'm quite sure. If it is the same thing, then there should be a link to "extension tube" on the extender disambig page. IronChris  |  (talk) 21:37, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: They're teleconverters. Reub2000 01:52, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nice, thanks a lot. IronChris  |  (talk) 16:57, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Same thing as an extender? 

message: I really don't know that much about optics, but I do know that extension tubes and tele extenders both add to the focal length, instead of multiplying it like teleconverters. When I wrote the article on tele extenders, I did not know about this article. Are they the same thing? If so, the article should be merged. --The High Fin Sperm Whale (talk) 03:08, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No, extension tubes do not change the focal length of a lens. Also, I've never heard of any device which simply adds to the focal length of a lens. Reub2000 (talk) 04:25, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging with [[Tele extender]] 

message: The link "List of Nikon compatible lenses with integrated autofocus-motor" was removed as it has no relevant relation to this article which is about extension rings which is independent of manufacturer or lens focus mechanism.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.154.38.99 (talk) 11:58, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to Nikon lens list 

message: Has anyone tried using an "extension tube" to adapt a Nikon IX style lense to newer Nikon cameras?  The Nikon IX lense was designed to be used with the Nikon Pronea APS cameras and have a shrouded piece of plastic that protrudes into the camera.  Some people have cut off this shrouded plastic so they can use Nikon IX lense in newer cameras.  My thought was instead of cutting it off, add an extension tube so you can use it for macro use.  • Sbmeirow • Talk •  12:32, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nikon IX lens
Talk:Stump (band)

message: Perchance the discography could be fleshed out a touch.
Just found out about this band through a friend. Interestingly, "Buffalo" is not on "A Fierce Pancake" (the one available through iTunes, at least.) Also, there is a a 2006 album available (again on iTunes) entitled "Uninvited." I'm going to try to track more info down before I start editing. --PrePressChris 03:19, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Note: Uninvited is by a completely different Stump.--Michig (talk) 20:19, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

text: It isn't a stub, so I have removed it.--Michig (talk) 20:19, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Cadillac DTS

message: I don't even know where to begin, but the very bottom of the article states that "it brings a new level of luxury to Cadillac." How does that NOT sound like an ad?
/lesigh. I wikitrace finds GM editing their pages again...
Scryer_360 (talk) 01:29, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Primary revisions have been made, some concerns will continue to be addressed. — James Kalmar  05:52, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Written like an advertisement 

message: The article is in the process of being redesigned to meet the concerns expressed above. — James Kalmar  04:30, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Primary revisions have been made, some concerns will continue to be addressed. — James Kalmar  05:52, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fundamental Redesign 

message: GM never announced the V-Series DTS. 76.254.16.106 (talk) 20:37, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  DTS-V should be removed from the Article's section per [[Wikipedia:WPAC#Unannounced_vehicles|WP:WPAC]] 

message: This is one of the most poorly written wiki articles I've ever come across. It's full of grammatical errors, lacks in detail, and reflects bias. Needs a thorough rework. 74.83.118.132 (talk) 07:58, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quality Control
Talk:2,4-Dinitrotoluene

message: This article contradicts itself by saying that dinitrotolulene is explosive, then that it is not explosive. I don't know enough about the subject to correct it, but clearly this must be a mistake or vandalism. Mowsala (talk) 13:17, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction 

message: 21:39, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: 'Explosiveness of DNT'

message: Image only includes 2,6-dimethyltolulene (ortho, ortho isomer), not the other isomers. It falsly implies there is only one isomer. Polonium 22:07, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Solved. Polonium 00:58, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disputed
Talk:On Fire (Galaxie 500 album)

message: Mike McGonigal's book Temperature's Rising: An Oral History of Galaxie 500 has a Rough Trade press release that dates the "scheduled" release date as 20 October 1989, there is a press release that puts the release date as 16 October which is likely to be the correct UK release date. I have, for now, used the 20 October date as it is cite-able.
Grange85 (talk) 08:10, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Release date

message: *All song titles serve as redirects to this album, have their own pages, or have been placed at the appropriate disambiguation pages.--Hraefen Talk 18:57, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: '''<^>v!!This album is connected!!v<^>'''
Talk:Bird's-eye shot

message: I don't quite understand the difference between bird's eye shot and High-angle shot. Maybe because of my poor english reading skills, or the opposition may not be so clearly explained (or maybe those are two articles about the same thing ?). I asked for clarification on Talk:High-angle shot. Benjamin.pineau (talk) 00:53, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[bird's eye shot]] and [[High-angle shot]] 

message: Perhaps it could be nice to give examples of shots from famous scenes that was filmed this way.
Specifically I believe GTA2 is worth mentioning: the whole game is displayed from a bird's-eye angle, which is very unique and unusual to video games. It definitely might be interesting to people who read about this kind of shot.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.65.79.207 (talk) 00:23, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Examples
Talk:Crane shot

message: I don't want to delete it myself, but is the SCTV anecdote really necessary for this entry, especially in that level of detail?  I've never heard of this show.
From the article: "there are some spectacular shots using remote cranes in the car-chase sequence of To Live and Die in L.A.."
Some people might not agree that those shots are spectacular, please provide some kind of reference and how it's spectacular. seriema 16:42, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: needs a brief history section. who pioneered the crane shot? orson wells famously used it in Citizen Cain? Also Leni Reifenstahl, I think. She's supposed to have been the first to shoot on a track, if I'm not mistaken. But the history doubtless stretched further back...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.134.64.239 (talk) 13:55, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: history?
Talk:Magallanes Region

message: Wouldn't an English name be preferrable here as used at here, here, and here? At least for the title, anyway.翔太 「Shouta:talk」 22:13, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  English name? 

message: Not sure what's meant by this. Geographical... accidents...
74.134.236.69 01:31, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geographical accidents? 

message: Three different forms of the name of this region are used between this article and the various categories.  I suggest discussion be centralised here, and any required move of this article done in line with that.  Alai (talk) 22:52, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move(s)

message: Is Eduardo Barros still the governor of the Antartica Chilena province? I really don't know much about it, but the last I heard from a guy who knows Barros, it seemed unlikely that he'd be governor much longer; this was a couple years ago. Cadwaladr (talk) 06:15, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Antartica

message: The official name of the region includes the Chilean antartic claim and must be included in the Wikipedia name. --Best regards, Keysanger (what?) 09:38, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Move to "Magallanes Region, Chile"
Talk:Establishing shot

message: A skyline view of a city is often used to identify the location a television show is produced or the city associated with an interviewee. News programs, late night television, and journalistic interviews often rely heavily on establishing shots. 
File:Secretary Kerry Makes an Appearance on The Late Show With Stephen Colbert in New York City (21873224425).jpg|The Late Show with Stephen Colbert uses a backdrop of Uptown Manhattan taken from Midtown.
Section building. B137 (talk) 01:12, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  As television backdrop
Talk:Mirage of Blaze

message: This article seeps of biase.
:I don't know what a "biase" is, but it is a bit of a mess in its current form.  I did a light bit of cleanup and formatting to bring the article in-line with the Anime Wikiproject, but I haven't seen this show yet (though I would like to).  Snarfies 02:18, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the person meant "bias"... Well, in any case, I agree. A lot of the things written on the page seems somewhat onesided. Snarfies, I hope you get to see the anime sometime. In the meantime, I'm going to do some clean up of the whole article (wikify it to an extent and reorganize the information) and add some more info. I'll also try removing as much bias as possible. - Dee Kaku 17:45, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

text: What Bias?  This page is very accurate. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.147.59.214 (talk) 05:35, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bleh

message: I just went through and changed the character names in the profiles to Western order, in keeping with Wikipedia policy, but when I got down to the cast list, I was a little confused. I'm actually rather unfamiliar with Mirage of Blaze, and so am unsure which names are in Western order and which are in Japanese order; to my eyes, it seems there may be a combination. Would anyone who's more familiar with the series care to give it a go? (I really wish I could do it myself! ^.^;) Lithiumflower 20:44, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name order in the cast list
Talk:Wide shot

message: this article is very bad and needs to be deleted  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.241.118.168 (talk) 23:18, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

message: As far as I’ve ever known for decades (expertise at least in still photography) “long shot” refers to the use of a long lens, often to shoot a subject close-up but from a distance, i.e., with depth-of-field compression. This is exactly the opposite of a “wide” or “establishing” shot, which seems to be the intended topic of this article. The ‘move history’ of this article, plus it’s current lede text, seem to confuse and conflate these. The lede should be fixed to omit, or not conflate “long shot”, or clarify that it means the opposite of “wide shot” 67.185.21.25 (talk) 03:30, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Note that the problem/confusion extends to the longshot disambiguation page as well. 67.185.21.25 (talk) 03:35, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  A “long shot” is exactly the opposite of a “wide shot”, not the same thing
Talk:Lee Saengkang

message: All the info is gleaned from other wikipedia articles.  A Google search on "Yi Saenggang" yields mostly Wikipedia mirror sites.  If anyone has any info about this person, please expand and source the article.--digital_me(TalkˑContribs) 22:22, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Did you search in Korean? Here is what appears to be his official site. Badagnani (talk) 19:59, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: Hello! May I ask you about Korean Music? I found this file, do you know the name of masters playing Korean bamboo flute (daegeum) here? I think I know the Korean daegeum master Lee Saenggang, I think he is the one among the two, but I'm not sure. No detailed information on the file's description. The conributor  is currently blocked. There's already a short article about him in English Wikipedia, Yi Saenggang  Thanks Cun Cun () 03:03, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  file
Talk:Tobias Matthew

message: The title of his piece seems suspect. I've never seen yin or ohm in Latin before.Homagetocatalonia 22:25, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Latin?

message: All the tags seem to refer to stuff in the old Britannica article, need they be separately marked?  Anmccaff (talk) 03:47, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations needed?
Talk:Rolling Rock

message: Is it worth mentioning that Rolling Rock is the official beer of choice of the Angry Video Game Nerd? ToaJuaraevo (talk) 19:37, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  AVGN 

message: I'm definitely not the type to use a talk page, but I cannot help but become annoyed by this article because it claims "current bottles have plastic labels". 
Despite the fact that Rolling Rock was bought-out by AB in 2006, AB has continued the tradition of painted-on labels. I'm drinking a bottle of Rolling Rock purchased last week and it does NOT have plastic on the bottle ANYWHERE. As far as I can tell the entire bottle is still painted with the label.
Instead of simply editing the article myself I thought I was call attention to this wording. Is it true? Have I simply lucked out and purchased a 12 pack that does not have plastic labels? I think the truth is that someone wants to 'diss' the current product of yore by saying that! I'll leave the rest up to you guys, just beer for thought.
- BC
:Yes, the labels are painted on. I've edited the article. If anyone finds otherwise, please reinsert with a source. – JBarta (talk) 16:22, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Current bottles have plastic labels" 

message: The article states that the beer was once "semi-premium", but is now "virtually indistinguishable" from the rest of anheuser's brands. These are not facts. I think the changeover can be described more objectively.
108.24.91.71 (talk) 03:45, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editorialization of Changeover 

message: There was a 33 beer in Viet Nam in the 60s. Its history, back to France in the early 1900s, is described in 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/333_Premium_Export_Beer
 33 referred to the 33 cl (=11.2 oz) bottle.
It seems at least as likely as the attemted explanations in the Rolling Rock page.2602:306:BD35:AB50:C038:A30F:7435:EFE2 (talk) 11:05, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  33
Talk:The Combatribes

message: So the Virtual Console version (of the SNES port) changes "Ground Zero" to Guilty Zero (pre-9/11, "Ground Zero" was a clear reference to a nuclear explosion). I wonder if the many instances of the World Trade Center towers are altered as well? (Title Screen and ending sequence showed them).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.22.221.88 (talk) 08:40, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: 9/11 Censorship?
Talk:Low-key lighting

message: The term "low key" in art predates cinema (and, for that matter, artificial lighting), and refers to something actually quite different.  This article needs to make a distinction between "low key lighting" and the older (but still used) term "low key" in painting and photography. See http://photo.stackexchange.com/q/10232/1943 Matthew Miller (talk) 13:03, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Apple box

message: Never heard "new york" or "texas"  i was taught positions  according to height. thus, position #1 is 8" tall, #2 is 12" and #3 is 20".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.172.25.73 (talk) 18:33, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

message: Basso block appears to have little, if any, content that is not already duplicated in this article.  Propose merging it into this article.  Girashnii (talk) 12:32, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger Proposal

message: No mention of European Apple Boxes? They're metal edged. 
And those Basso Blocks... Pretty sure we call them Paganini's in the UK. I.e. A "Pag" Set. https://eyefish.tv/dictionary/pags-paganinis  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.135.121.6 (talk) 15:16, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes it is very USA production centric (maybe Canada too?). Most of the apple box sets I've seen in Australia are heavier-duty nesting variety that don't match the US sizes. I really should update the article for international use. Paulzag (talk) 02:22, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Non-American Types
Talk:Currawong

message: Can someone please spilit the article into species? Like this:California Condor and Andean Condor
:Sure, gimme a bit of timeCas Liber 21:03, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: please?

message: It is sometimes said, with at least some justice, that the home gardener can have either currawongs or small birds, but not both... Well I can attest to the falsity of this statement. At our place we get currawongs, lorries, cockies, galahs and even the odd bush turkey feeding around the same tree simultaneously. Of course it helps to put both wild-bird seed and mealworms out for them, as suggested by the remainder of the statement. --Jquarry 05:38, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Um, none of the others you mentioned are small birds. Generally poeple mean things like fairy wrens, thornbills, robins, gerygones etc. Sorry, Cas Liber 08:19, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Home Gardener 

message: I tend to agree with the poster of == Home Gardener == above.
We own a property (aptly named CURRAWONG ) in Toolern Vale, Victoria, Australia. The property attracts many, varied birds. Without knowing the names of such birds, I can attest to many of them being decidedly small (eg ones the size of robins that have blue plumage on the chest, or others having orange plumage on the chest). Saying that, the majority of birdlife are of larger sizes eg. currawongs, magpies, a "dove" like bird, and cockatoos.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Audifred (talk • contribs) 03:13, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Home Gardener
Talk:Gurney Halleck

message: Sure, the reference in Children of Dune is correct.  It never, however, says that they're married, simply lovers.  Lover does not imply marriage, and in fact, an earlier example exists with the Lady Jessica herself and the Duke Leto, where Jessica was concubine, not wife, to Leto.  Even Leto was not Jessica's spouse.  None of the books come out and say flat out that they're married, so in my opinion, it's insane for an "encyclopedia" to include information that isn't even in the books.  Lovers, sure, perhaps.  Spouses?  It never says or even implies that.   67.8.93.121 (talk) 03:24, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lady Jessica as his "spouse"?
Talk:Axial cut

message: Can someone draw a picture demonstrating this effect? Cogiati (talk) 01:05, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 
Talk:Erik Årsäll

message: I'll take care of it! (?) Said: Rursus ☺ ★ 18:27, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I did take care of it. Said: Rursus ☺ ★ 19:34, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The messup by double move

message: I think it is misleading to say that this guy's "historiocity has been called into question by recent scholarship," because it is not as if this was brought up in 1998. Lagerquist is just reflecting generally held scholarly opinion, that here are good reasons to doubt that this guy existed. Already the short article in Nordisk Familjebok (1908) was not far from saying that. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 15:50, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I do not see anything wrong with my edit in October, where I inserted:"There are good reasons to doubt that he existed. He is dated by some to the end of the 11th century, by others to the 1120's, while more critical historians believe that he is a legendary name belonging to the 10th century." With a reference. The sentence "Eric does not appear in any Swedish or Danish primary sources" was already there, and that is of course the main reason for questioning this guy's existence. Not a shred of evidence. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 17:17, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: On the contrary, since he is mentioned by Snorri, there is "a shred of evidence". It's just evidence that some regard as untrustworthy. Briangotts (Talk) (Contrib) 20:57, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Recent scholarship"? 

message: When there is no obvious candidate English common name for an individual, the following policy statement applies (WP:UE): if there are too few English-language sources to constitute an established usage, follow the conventions of the language appropriate to the subject (German for German politicians, Portuguese for Brazilian towns, and so on). In my opinion, the title of the article should be whatever name he is generally known by in Sweden. If Årsäll is a vulgarism or an epithet that is not an overriding common Swedish name for the king, then it is reasonable to explore alternative Swedish names, but, per policy, it is not proper to translate the name or invent a new name for him. --RegentsPark (talk) 16:57, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: "Erik Årsäll" is also used in an old English edition of Anders Fryxell's "The History of Sweden" (p. 180, 182). The name is explained when it is first mentioned, and in parentheses "Year blest" is given as an equivalent. But that translation has never caught on. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 17:47, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

text: Thank you RegentsPark! SergeWoodzing (talk) 19:08, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Third opinion

message: The info box was dropped with this edit summary:
*The succession appears to be highly speculative... even the existence of this individual is questioned in the sources. Dropped the box. Easily reverted if someone feels strongly.
OK by me. SergeWoodzing (talk) 14:51, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Minor point:  This was the succession box.- Sinneed 15:40, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  
Info
 Succession box dropped
Talk:Cinema Products Corporation

message: I meet Mr. Ed Di Giulio (RIP) in 1990, at "Malibu Classics Intl. Workshop"  for Steadicam; and he came very courtesy with his wife and Kenn Ferro (Steadicam Operator) from US.  We did one Workshop here in Chile, in fact it was the only Steadicam Worshop done in Latinamerica, still todays (2008).   In effect, the former Cinema Products Corp.  makes an important contribution of the world intl. film market.  The Steadicam system was one of them, and maybe the  most important contribution 'till todays.  Aldo Aste, Steadicam Op. (Chile)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.104.70.153 (talk) 21:43, 3 April 2008 (UTC)