Talk:Birthright (campaign setting)

message: Decided to flesh out this page a bit, but worried that I might be getting the style wrong.  Doesn't seem to be much consistency within the various D&D settings though. Obviously the important details will vary from world to world, but there are probably some basic patterns that could be followed.   FrozenPurpleCube 01:47, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Some consistency in describing all the game worlds would probably be nice.  A basic outline and some sort of list of salient facts would probably be sufficient.  (Though I suppose it might take a little doing to coordinate even such a small list of items amongst what is probably a rather large community of contributors....)
geeman 31 June 2006
There are a few things I think should also be included in this description:
   1. A summary of the domain level of play.
   2. A list and brief description of major characters in the setting.  (The Gorgon, Rhoubhe, etc.)
I'd be happy to contribute, but is there anything else that seems like it should be included?
Geeman 08:07, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Consistency

message: :- Notability:
:'In 1996, Birthright won the Origins Award for Best Roleplaying Supplement of 1995.'
:Wikipedia:Notability (books) says that a book is notable when it has won a major literary award. Birthright is a game and has won a game award. Is there a list, which awards count as major for the purpose of establishing notability? If not, I would see this criterion as fulfilled and therefore remove the tag.
:- Lacking citations:
:All plot summary information presented here is based on the books listed unter 'List of Birthright Products'. Maybe this could be made clearer still (using footnotes?). Only the sources providing real-world context are missing.
:In this light: Is the lacking citations tag really justified?
Daranios (talk) 15:27, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Tags justified?

message: I saw nothing about those articles in Dragon Magazine which had Birthright as theme and described various details. Should those be mentioned here? On birthright.net they are already mentioned. ConjurerDragon (talk) 10:06, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Which Dragon articles? The only one I see mentioned is the one that says Rich Baker co-designed the setting, unless I am just missing something. 24.148.0.83 (talk) 12:02, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

text: Why not! Birthright didn't have an overabundance of source text, so it couldn't hurt to mention (briefly, in most cases) any supporting material that appeared for it. 24.148.0.83 (talk) 01:16, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dragon? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Birthright (campaign setting). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.sportsfactbook.com/history/Birthright_%28campaign_setting%29
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110516174200/http://www.montecook.com/cgi-bin/page.cgi?int_dnd30_Colin to http://www.montecook.com/cgi-bin/page.cgi?int_dnd30_Colin
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd%2Farch%2Fowa
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:37, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified