Talk:Felipe VI

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:09, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion 

message: Why was Philip VI removed from the intro of the page? GoodDay (talk) 02:23, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I share in the same concern. While there are multiple defensible criteria on whether to title the article Felipe VI or Philip VI, I think it is less debatable that the lead section of the article should include both the localized the name as well as the English one. Articles for all previous five Philips include their names in English. Al83tito (talk) 22:14, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

text: I assume it was removed because he's not called Philip. DrKay (talk) 22:16, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: What do you mean? the Spanish article on King Charles III of the United Kingdom has his name translated into Spanish: Carlos III (https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carlos_III_del_Reino_Unido). Al83tito (talk) 23:07, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Presumably, because he's called Carlos in Spanish-language sources. What the Spanish wikipedia calls its article on Charles depends on what policies are in place there and is a question for editors there to decide not here. DrKay (talk) 23:10, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  I agree that the majority of English sources refer to him as Felipe. And in consequence it seems appropriate that the English article would be titled using the Spanish name Felipe. The question is whether alternative names, such as his name in English, should be included within the lead section of the article. There is a smaller set of sources that do use the English name (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6). I am surmising from the search results that the use of Philip is more prevalent in middle eastern and south Asian media. So I'd move to have the English version name included within the article. Al83tito (talk) 00:00, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Philip VI  

message: The article that is cited only vaguely refers to "a poll conducted by the Spanish newspaper El Español in 2020", with no link to the poll in question. So I took it upon myself to find the original article, which I did (https://www.elespanol.com/espana/politica/20200811/felipe-vi-convence-espanoles-aprueba-incluso-menores/511949939_0.html). We know it's the original because it's from El Español, it's from 2020 and it features the statistic of 64% that appears in the cited article.
The original poll doesn't support the claim that Felipe VI has "moderately high approval ratings, especially among younger Spaniards". In fact, younger Spaniards (born after 1990) are the age group in which Felipe enjoys the least support, with only 44.5% of them approving of him in contrast to 44.1% of them disapproving of him, which is much lower than his 64% general approval rating. This should be corrected and a more trustworthy source should be used. Sir. Paulord (talk) 02:08, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poll cited in the introduction doesn't support the article's claims 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Alfonso XII which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 01:30, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion in progress 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:38, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Elizabeth II which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 15:46, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: This discussion has been closed. History6042 (talk) 16:14, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion in progress 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Procedural close. Discussed in full a few months ago here and the same article was nominated by the same user and closed minutes go here. This is disruptive behavior. Rreagan007 (talk) 17:04, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Felipe VI →  – To be consistent with the rest of Spanish monarchs. Also, WP:NCROY applies here. History6042 (talk) 16:13, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 14 August 2023 

message: (non-automated message) Greetings! I have opened an RfC on WT:ROYALTY that may be of interest to users following this article talk page! You are encouraged to contribute to this discussion here! Hurricane Andrew (444) 19:53, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfC of interest