Talk:One Night Stand (2007)

message: what do we need this page for?
all the other lower PPV are on a page listed by PPV, why do the 2007 PPV's have a seperate page for all the PPV themselves???  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.84.243.149 (talk) 18:31, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Because editors have taken it upon themselves to create the articles and source them. Gavyn Sykes (talk) 18:37, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

text: It was the night after: http://www.onlineworldofwrestling.com/results/raw/070604.html . TJ Spyke 03:20, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

message: I've got a lot of stuff going on right now, so I will have to do this review a little at a time. From what I've seen so far:
====Background====
#"The main event and main match" in the second lead paragraph sounds odd. Perhaps just "The main match on the RAW brand..." would work better.
#:
#The first sentence of the second lead paragraph is a little long. I would recommend splitting it so that "Cena won by pinning Khali after executing an FU off a crane onto the arena floor." is its own sentence.
#:
#"Main" is kind of overdone in the lead. I would recommend "The undercard featured..."
#:
#In the "Background" section, "main" is overdone again. Can we alternate "primary" with "main"?
#:
#The lead says that Lashley faced Vince McMahon, but the Background section states that Lashley fought Team McMahon. Should this say, "The other feud featured on the One Night Stand card consisted of both RAW and ECW superstars."?
#:
#The stipulations for the Lashley/Team McMahon match at Judgment Day are unclear. Were all of the wrestlers in the ring at the same time? Did Team McMahon compete as a tag team? Could a member of Team McMahon have won the ECW title?
#:
#The May 28 match was a Handicap match, right? This could be stated in the text so that casual readers aren't confused.
#:
====Event====
#In the first paragraph of the "Event" section, Orton "hitting" Van Dam with a DDT seems like jargon. "Performed" or something similar would work better than "hitting".
#:
#In the second paragraph of the event section, I find the following sentence confusing: "Burke ended up on the table, with Punk performing a suplex on Striker off the top rope and through the table to win the contest." Did Burke go through the table or did Striker? If it was Striker (as the sentence seems to imply), what happened to Burke?
#:.
#"Advantage" is used too much in the third paragraph of the "Event" section. It probably isn't necessary to clarify who had the advantage at all times, so at least one of the "advantage"s should probably go.
#:.
#I'm not sure how the botched springboard fits into the description. Did he not mean to kick the ladder?
#:IMO, he botched a springboard attempt onto the ladder, but was able to flip and kick the ladder from underneath Jeff. –LAX 10:15, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Updated March 30 GaryColemanFan (talk) 21:02, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

text: Passed. giggy (:O) 00:06, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pre-GA Review 

message: #In the first paragraph of the "Event" section, Orton "hitting" Van Dam with a DDT seems like jargon. "Performed" or something similar would work better than "hitting".
#:
#In the second paragraph of the event section, I find the following sentence confusing: "Burke ended up on the table, with Punk performing a suplex on Striker off the top rope and through the table to win the contest." Did Burke go through the table or did Striker? If it was Striker (as the sentence seems to imply), what happened to Burke?
#:.
#"Advantage" is used too much in the third paragraph of the "Event" section. It probably isn't necessary to clarify who had the advantage at all times, so at least one of the "advantage"s should probably go.
#:.
#I'm not sure how the botched springboard fits into the description. Did he not mean to kick the ladder?
#:IMO, he botched a springboard attempt onto the ladder, but was able to flip and kick the ladder from underneath Jeff. –LAX 10:15, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Event

message: #The "Aftermath" section needs expansion. Can more be said about any of these feuds?
#:
#The discussion of Vince McMahon in the "Aftermath" section is too point of view (acting strangely, scheduling unreasonable matches, odd behavior). "appeared traumatized" is probably original research. This should be just a statement of the facts. What was the odd behavior? Can you find a source to verify that people considered these matches unusual or unreasonable?
#:I found some; according to his OWOW profile. Would that work? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 19:35, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Updated March 30 GaryColemanFan (talk) 21:02, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

text: Passed. giggy (:O) 00:06, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Aftermath

message: It might not be stated, but except from the original PPV's theme, there was a different main theme on the main menu of One Night Stand 2007 dvd. Does anyone know which one is it, or how is it named?Miltiadis Redearth (talk) 17:12, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  One Night Stand 2007 Theme