lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Lantana (film)

message: The last line of the plot summary reads: "However Sonja is unable to return his desire, and the fate of their marriage is left inconclusive."
This is a subjective interpretation. Firstly, she does return his gaze in the end and the movie ends with them looking at each other's eyes. Her reasons for not returning his gaze immediately could be plentiful: she's never been so intimate with him before - the past few events have brought them closer together, the healing process just ended at this last dance, etc. 
The last line, in my opinion should read something like this: "Sonja struggles to initially return Leon's gaze but does so just before the movie ends." No need for interpretations in this section, IMHO. 
Supadog (talk) 15:15, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Waited 6 months - went ahead with the change. Supadog (talk) 01:14, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot should not include interpretations 
Talk:Don's Party

message: So it should not start with the play. I would suggest something along these lines:"Don's Party is a 1976 film adapted from the 1971 play by David Williamson..". What do you think? Thanks Kvsh5 (talk) 15:26, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The article is about the 1976 film 
Talk:Japanese Story

message: "Sandy can warn him of the danger"
WHATS the DANger???? Obviously it was violent, gah  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.17.213.44 (talk) 01:31, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: AS a US citizen, I'm quite familiar with the "foreign notion" of shallow water, especially having dived into such many time, amazingly surviving, which is far less common. Simple notion, dive fully and hard, as the character did, break your frigging neck, it was between 4-6 feet of water! After breaking a few pool bottoms, I learned far better, as I tired of an aching neck! Is the concept THAT hard to fathom? Or has my European, Middle Eastern and farther Eastern experience jaded me in terms of common sense?Wzrd1 (talk) 05:25, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Sum of Us (play)

message: The director's name is correct - Kevin Dowling - but the link is to the wrong Kevin Dolwing.  Here is a link to the correct Kevin Dowling's IMDB page:  http://imdb.com/name/nm0235852/ Mkghost (talk) 21:53, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Note

message: This would help with disambiguation by allowing The Sum of Us to go to the disambiguation page or the NYTimes bestselling book page (or whatever is most relevant at the time) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Superb Owl (talk • contribs) 19:43, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Migrating page to: ''[[The Sum of Us (play)]]''
Talk:Alvin Purple

message: It may have also been released as "The Sex Therapist" but living in New York I saw "Alvin Purple" posters all over.  (The Daily News gave it zero stars and a one-sentence review: "'Alvin Purple' is garbage.") 68.196.1.236 (talk) 16:35, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Released in U.S. under its original name
Talk:Fat Pizza

message: It's not possible that this movie cost $400,000,000.  That must be a mistake.
27.3.73.55 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 02:50, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Budget
Talk:The Adventures of Barry McKenzie

message: In  this edit I removed the phrases "This quote makes no sense at all." and "There is no doubt that the early mutual relationship between Bruce Beresford and Barry Humphries gave unforeseen impetus to both of their careers, beyond the shorelines of Australia." Both of these are opinion, the opinion of a Wikipedia editor, not of a cited source. Moreover they are opnions stated as absolute facts. This is not appropriate as per WP:OR, which says: "" and "" and WP:NPOV says: " The removed text was not, in my view, in conformance with these policies. DES (talk) 01:01, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uncited editorializing 
Talk:Holy Smoke!

message: This film was hated by most film goers and this is reflected adequately across the internet.
It would be nice if this pretentious piece of junk could have some comments attached to its wikipedia article that reflect its true overall reception, rather than just the nice columnists comments.
Personally I regard this film as worthy of note only in the same way Ed Wood's "Glenn Or Glenda" is.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.134.28.230 (talk) 02:51, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remarkable lack of criticism
Talk:Harlequin (film)

message: This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB.
Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 20:04, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "needs infobox" tag 
Talk:Head On (1998 film)

message: I notice this verb also used in the Rotten Tomatoes reference. Is this a euphemism, polari, or just a poor choice of words? It tells me nothing. Doug butler (talk) 07:20, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fulfill
Talk:BMX Bandits (film)

message: I think it's her best movie, everything else she has done is woeful. Mikecraig (talk) 00:50, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Kidman
Talk:Storm Boy (novel)

message: Does he name it as a chick, or only when it returns? 58.6.94.98 20:37, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mr Percival 

message: There's a song called Storm Boy from the Australian Singer/Songwriter Xavier Rudd. He specifically mentions Mr. Percival. Should this song be referenced here as well? 2A04:4540:653E:3800:7FFC:F802:4DB7:9CFD (talk) 11:42, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adaptations
Talk:Ellen Johnson

message: This page is really just a resume for a rather insignificant figure.  Just being the head of an organization does not warrant encyclopedic merit. Perhaps if this article weren't mainly comprised of references to various pieces she's written and TV appearances I'd feel differently. --NEMT 01:24, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not a great article, but the organization is fairly notable and she's been on national news programs. That is notable enough to count. She's certainly as notable as say Jessie Jane Duff or Barbara Loe Fisher.--T. Anthony 12:16, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well since Jessie Jane Duff got deleted, maybe it's time for an AFD? --PEAR (talk) 17:49, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not notable 

message: I've removed it per WP:NOT. As some other editors already posted, it made the article look like a resume. It was also completely pointless.
The article is much better looking, easier to read, meaningful, and concise without it.
--PEAR (talk) 17:53, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  That horrible section of unreferenced media info 

message: There is an RfC on the question of using "Religion: None" vs. "Religion: None (atheist)" in the infobox on this and other similar pages. 
The RfC is at Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion. 
Please help us determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 18:08, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion|Request for Comments]] 
Talk:Crackerjack (2002 film)

message: Crackerjack was actually filmed on location at the bowls club in Carrum, not Windsor.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.38.233.82 (talk) 04:51, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Chopper (film)

message: Jellydonut456 15:40, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link 

message: That picture is the front cover of Mark Read's book, not the film poster. Could do with being changed Norman22b (talk) 18:33, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pic 

message: There have recently been several changes to the Organised Crime categories without any consensus for the change.  This has apparently been initiated by one editor's decision to nominate an existing category for deletion.
Instead of simply reverting edits and becoming embroiled in an edit war, I encourage all interested parties to comment at The Cat for deletion page.
Cheers,  This flag once was red  22:31, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Organized (sic) Crime
Talk:Caddie (film)

message: I have added a fair use copy of the DVD cover to the infobox and removed the reqphoto. amitch 10:19, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture
Talk:İskender kebap

message: It says in the article that Iskender is made from ground meat but as far as I know, the meat grinders (mincing machines) were invented around the time the Iskender restaurant was established. The machines can't have been very popular in Turkey back then. Sorry that I can't find any reference here. 80.221.5.74 09:25, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually the best / real Döner is prepared from pieces of meat stacked together, not from ground meat.  The best restaurants only use real Döner.  The ground meat is used by mass produced packaged Döner.  --Gokhan 14:42, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

text: İskender is basicly made of döner which is definately not ground meat at all. It's made of stacked large meat pieces.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.246.61.94 (talk) 12:38, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

text: I changed the information about the type of meat used in İskender Kebap. (No longer "ground meat") 164.67.237.88 (talk) 03:18, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: FYI, and slightly out of subject, meat grinding in many restaurants and traditional homes in Turkey, as well as in neighbouring countries with very traditional cusines, such as Syria is made "by hand", with the help of huge round edged cleavers (weighing up to 4 kilos) named "Zırh" in Turkish . The grinding machine just kills the taste off. Still İskender is no ground meat. --88.254.132.139 (talk) 14:43, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Ground meat

message: This article, and Wikipedia in general, is not a advertisement for different products, please discuss your changes here before adding more material.
Warrington (talk) 09:45, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertisement
Talk:King David (film)

message: *Previous versions of this article discussed how the movie completely changes the story of David from what the Bible tells. In the Bible, David feigns insanity to escape from Achish, King of Gath. In the movie, David feigns insanity to gain admittance to the presence of Achish. The story has been turned upside down. In the Bible, David is banned from building the Temple because he has shed too much blood. In the movie, it is because he has not shed enough blood. He has made no effort to exterminate the Canaanites. And so on throughout the movie. The story is in every case the opposite of what the Bible says.  Das Baz, aka Erudil 17:46, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Radical departures from Biblical story
Talk:Green Card (film)

message: yes, by all means, merge georges in here. — jdorje (talk) 04:13, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge 
Talk:Così

message: The current last two paras, which are from "03:55, 19 December 2005 203.51.35.97" smell pretty fishy.  Can anyone attest to Alex Barry, Stevo-O, or Tom Robertson?  Surely the last bit in particular is just ridiculous?  -- Kevin Ryde 00:17, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I made that change.  Some of what was there might have been true, other bits of it were pretty clear bull.  In complete absense of any cited sources I'm not inclined to try to sort the wheat from the chaff.  -- Kevin Ryde 22:11, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dec 2005 additions 

message: Where exactly does Bruce Campbell appear in this film?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.217.32.42 (talk) 12:35, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bruce Campbell 

message: I removed a section on a US restaurant chain called 'Cosi'. Although the name of the restaurants are linked to the play Cosi fan tutti by Mozart, they are really not relevant to the play by Louis Nowra.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.240.114.142 (talk) 15:11, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  American restaurant chain 
Talk:Black and White (2000 film)

message: Please don't change the release date on this movie away from 1999 - IMDb lists the initial release date as 1999, not 2000, as do all other acceptable sources. Sandi saraya (talk) 20:48, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree - this is a 1999 movie, NOT a 2000 one. EVERY website I've seen lists this movie as 1999, and I've never seen any reference to it being released in 2000. 84.69.169.150 (talk) 11:28, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release date. 

message: Having reviewed the official Wikipedia guidelines at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:FilmRelease, I've decided to merge this article with the duplicate one at Black and White (1999 film) on the grounds that:
:1) IMDb and other reputable websites all list this movie as 1999, and not 2000.
:2) Wikipedia guidelines at the above URL state that the important date is "The film's earliest release, whether it was at a film festival or a public release." As this movie was first shown at a 1999 film festival, then its earliest release was in 1999, and this should be reflected in the title of the Wikipedia entry.
The 1999 article has been edited to reflect the fact that the 1999 release was limited to two screenings at film festivals, and that the widespread theatrical release did not take place until 2000. Hopefully, this will prevent any further "edit wars" over the release date. Sandi saraya (talk) 18:47, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merged with 1999 entry.
Talk:The Man Who Sued God

message: I have removed  the adaptation section from the main article because:
1) It does not provide the sources that ascertain adaptation of this movie into Gujrati Drama.
2) The equally valid influences on the mentioned dramas & this fild like Bollywood movie Yehi Hai Zindagi, Gujrati Drama Gandhi vs Gandhi etc are not taken into consideration.
I believe a thorough discussion on the validity of these claims will help make this article accurate & Neutral  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rushikesh.tilak (talk • contribs) 16:06, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of Adaptation Section
Talk:Desloratadine

message: Although its article does not include dosage information, Desloratadine itself is quite versatile. It does not cause drowsiness (mechanism of action) and it does cause drowsiness (side effects).  The principle underlying this action should be documented and applied more widely.  If the principle can be sufficiently generalized to be applied to things other than drugs, the possibilities are endless.  One could spend money today and still have it to spend it tomorrow.  One could be married and single.  One could be here and there.  More research is needed.  Quickly.  Jm546 15:25, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I was just going to point out this contradiction, but you did it so much better than I ever could have.  Now if only I knew enough to fix it. 76.202.57.153 02:33, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

text: Very well put, but the issue is actually more subtle than that. Drowsiness as a side effect is less likely with (des)?loratadine than with so-called first generation antihistamines. According to at least one source, drowsiness is a "less common" side effect (although that refers to an absolute scale). l0b0 (talk) 07:33, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: comment

message: I worked as a med. representative in Egypt on a generic desloratidine drug and I listened to the feedback of patients on such drug comparing to loratidine and they were very positive and the price was affordable also ..I think if desloratidine is produced with affordable price and good quality it will be so much better than its parent loratidine
41.206.157.216 (talk) 16:13, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Are these kinds of "expert opinions" even allowed here? This statement is extremely misleading to laypeople and of absolutely no statistical value. l0b0 (talk) 07:45, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, the active part of loratadine is only its metabolite, desloratadine, so there is no point of making the liver work hard on creating small amount of the active ingredient of you can manufacture and sell it outright. As of 2022, 5mg tablets of desloratadine are available without prescription now in the EU, which means it was recognized as safe and harmless enough to be made available as OTC medication. 178.143.124.90 (talk) 08:11, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  MY OPINION AS A CHEMIST 

message: Dosing:
http://www.drugs.com/pro/desloratadine.html
The recommended dose is one 5mg once daily.
Desloratadine 2.5 to 20 mg/day was studied. Doses of 5, 7.5, 10, and 20 mg/day were superior to placebo, so 2.5mg wasn't.
No additional benefit was seen at doses above 5mg.
In the same study, an increase in the incidence of somnolence(=sleepiness) was observed at doses of 
10mg/day and 20mg/day (5.2% and 7.6%, respectively), compared to placebo (2.3%).
--91.159.191.219 (talk) 15:36, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dosing: 2.5mg=no benefit, 5mg=benefit, >5mg=no additional benefit but more side-effects 

message: As of 2022, the 5mg desloratadine is available in the EU without a prescription, YMMV.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.143.124.90 (talk) 08:06, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  RX status
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Community/Archive

message: I could also use some help defining the scope of the project. Evidently I have failed to adequately describe the purpose and scope of the Community project. Quinobi 21:27, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Project scope discussion

message: I've associated some articles on the project page.
If you see any more that fit please feel free to add them. Quinobi 21:27, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Managing the Community Wikiportal

message: These are just informal acknowlegements and commendations for folks that do things that help the community at Wikipedia to function as an organized whole and for helping me to better understand what my own focus as a Community Builder should be. Feel free to add anyone here that you think should be commended or add comments to these if you like.  Quinobi
 
*Thank you very much Raul654 for your suggestions. You're a great "administrator,  bureaucrat, and  arbitrator" {I may even be changing my mind about polititians.) "I've respected your opinion since I first met you, although your yankee ways are a bit alien to me. hehe. 
*I'ld also like to thank and commend TheCustomOfLife for his determination in re-aligning the Southern Wikipedians message board and being so civil in #wikipedia. I especially enjoyed and was encourged, inspired and comforted by the conversation you and Raul654 had last night in the channel. It's refreshing to hear adults speaking intellegently and on topic in an IRC environment.
*Thanks espescially to ShaunMacPherson for joining the Community project and bringing me in to the Fact and Reference Check project. I think that project is out in front in the fight for Wikipedia's honor. That is gruelling work and not for the faint of heart!
*I think this ship is finally getting underway and hope to see her out there in the open seas with the rest of the fleet, sails full and flags a-flyin :)   Quinobi 22:15, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Acknowlegements and commendations

message: Cultural appropriation has just been nominated on WP:IDRIVE. Public education and Flirting as well as Teenage pregnancy are also currently nominated on Wikipedia:This week's improvement drive and may be of interest to you.  If you are interested in contributing, please vote or comment here: This week's improvement drive--Fenice 09:23, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Improvement Drive

message: A total rewrite of the Community article has been called for and I agree, as the article as it stands today is essentially an essay written mostly by me. I have copied that version to my user space at User:CQ/Community. -- CQ 00:26, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite of Community article
Talk:Goparaju Ramachandra Rao

message: There is an RfC on the question of using "Religion: None" vs. "Religion: None (atheist)" in the infobox on this and other similar pages. 
The RfC is at Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion. 
Please help us determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 18:08, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion|Request for Comments]] 
Talk:Milt

message: *needs to be converted from an almost-disambiguation page to an article
*needs one or more references in addition to one from an online dictionary
User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 15:32, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup request - 28 Jan 2006

message: Is milt ever eaten outside of the organs? 128.146.46.2 (talk) 14:44, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genitalia? 

message: In the UK, milt is sold in cans as 'soft roe'. I think it would be a good idea to mention this in the article...if only to upset the soft roe fans who don't realise that they're eating fish spunk.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.222.14.113 (talk) 21:41, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Soft Roe
Talk:Christopher Gorham

message: Subject directed an episode of Covert Affairs last season. ANewJulie 9:21 PST 13th July 2013  —Preceding undated comment added 04:25, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Filmography Needs Update 

message: I've added circa dates to both sons, but I don't know when they were born, I have just written an approximate date based on their age now. If anyone knows their exact dates, that would be great! I've generally tried to clean up the article and format it a bit so I hope it looks better now! Sky83 (talk) 18:30, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Children's dates of birth 

message: Is Christopher really blind? 2603:900B:201:D000:52C:8260:A0D7:AF3C (talk) 03:03, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Christopher Gorham
Talk:Municipalities of South Africa

message: With the abolition of cross border municipalities, some of the entries on this page may need to change.
168.209.98.35 15:35, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Abolition of cross border municipalities

message: This article was in dire need of a cleanup, as tagged, and I have begun that effort. As part of this, I have moved the list of municipalities to List of South African Municipalities. That page is going to require a lot of cleaning up and maintenance, and I think it would be better to use it as a reference for the creation of articles, which can then be added to categories of municipalities, rather than a static list. Anyway, I'll get back to this later, and try and add some more information. Unfortunately, making sense of the intricacies of South African local government is a difficult task, as most of these have only been in existence, in their current form, for 5 years (or less). Oh well... -Kieran 19:36, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup and moving of list information

message: Shouldn't a catagory Settlements in South Africa exist? Paul Hjul 08:01, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Settlements in SA
Talk:Hogan Cup

message: If anyone can find out the other winners/runner's up, that would be cool. I'll try and research them myself as I have time.
However, I'm a little concerned that the list could get very long if it remains in the current format, any suggestions of making it look more managable? One idea that comes to my mind is only having notable winners in the main list (how notable is notable?) with a general item for teams that have only won it once or twice. MartinRe 15:36, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Have now completed the list (up to 2006 result) with listing notable teams as those who have appeared five or more times in total, which seems to work well enough. MartinRe 14:39, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Roll of honour
Talk:Biographical evaluation

message: I wan to add a section about shia's view point on Biographical evaluation and their criterion in the sphere.--m,sharaf (talk) 20:13, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  shia's view in Ilm Rijal 