lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Gobbledygook

message: I see no reason in principle why Gobbledygook and Gibberish should not be treated in a single article. Each describes nonsensical language use, especially speech. I have no strong preference for the name of the merged article; Gobbledygook is slightly larger at present, but Gibberish is older. I propose merging the articles into a single title, and would ask anyone who supports such a move to suggest where they think the merged article should be located (i.e. what its title should be). Cnilep (talk) 02:41, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Carl Deuker

message: This was speedied by User:Spearhead. I removed the speedy, as he at least claims to have written a number of books.  Maybe it should be AfD'd, but the nominating user is putting very many speedies out there so I'm not sure he is carefully considering each one, and I'm not on patrol for this, so no VfD. Herostratus 23:00, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Waydowntown

message: Does release-date mean the date that it was first viewed by the public in final form?  Because, if so, then it was 2000-09-10.  This is when it was played at the Toronto International Film Festival.  But if it means theatre release, then it was 2002-01-25. --gord 23:02, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: * A Success Story for Slackers
* Spotlight On... Gary Burns
:to use with this article--J.D. (talk) 17:41, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Headlines
Talk:Tandy Center Subway

message: This article said that the Newark Subway was another privately owned subway during the lifetime of the TCS.  The Newark City Subway page says that before New Jersey Transit took it over, it was owned by the "Public Service Corporation of New Jersey," which sounds like a public company to me.  I removed this assertion, but if someone knows more, please correct. --Jfruh 23:12, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Newark Subway privately owned?

message: When I was little, my mom used to take me on the tandy subway. We'd park in a giant hot parking lot, and then go underground down these stairs underneath the rails. That was so cool. Then we'd wait at one of the different colored stations for the next train. The ride was pretty short, but it was really cool when we got to the tunnel that eventually went to the building. It was all lit up with little amber lights in lines on the walls - at least that's what i remember. Might actually have been different and my imagination is making things different from what they really were. I miss that train. It is a fond childhood memory.
70.251.156.5 (talk) 07:47, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  I remember the subway 

message: Leonard's subway was not the only "private" subway in the U.S. In Philadelphia, the Market Street end of the Market-Frankford Line was built entirely by private capital - and remained under private ownership until 1968.
The Newark City Subway was not fully "private." The tunnel itself was paid for by the city, and leased to the operator (not sure about the open-air sections of right-of-way).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.103.157.115 (talk) 07:23, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not the only "private" subway in the U.S.
Talk:Cowboy Savant

message: I was just trying to flesh out the Rony Cox page wioth some details, if you feel it is an add, so be it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by GerardKeating (talk • contribs) 18:13, 14 December 2005   (UTC-5)
This page does not IMO qual;ify for speedy deleteion, see WP:CSD. Take it to WP:AFD if you think it should be deleted. DES (talk) 00:32, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Zlatan Ibrahimović

message: AS IS:
Zlatan Ibrahimović (Swedish pronunciation: [ˈslǎːtan ɪbraˈhǐːmʊvɪtɕ], Bosnian pronunciation: [zlǎtan ibraxǐːmoʋitɕ]; born 3 October 1981) is a Swedish professional footballer who plays as a striker for Serie A club AC Milan.
UPDATE:
Zlatan Ibrahimović (Swedish pronunciation: [ˈslǎːtan ɪbraˈhǐːmʊvɪtɕ], Bosnian pronunciation: [zlǎtan ibraxǐːmoʋitɕ]; born 3 October 1981) or simply Ibra, is a Swedish retired professional footballer. 188.95.241.142 (talk) 12:51, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Still a contracted player until 30 June. TylerBurden (talk) 16:51, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update to include retirement 

message: Smartnate64 (talk) 22:31, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: He is not yet retired, and the changes you mentioned are already in place. DreamRimmer (talk) 09:17, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 16 June 2023 

message: Misleading information:the transfer fee Barcelona offer Samuel Eto’o plus £59 million to exchange Zlatan in 2009
It should be replaced with [Samuel Eto’o plus €46 million] https://archive.today/20110706220728/http://www.fcbarcelona.cat/web/castellano/noticies/futbol/temporada09-10/07/n090727107758.html  42.98.246.120 (talk) 23:34, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: 40 million according to attached BBC source, so changed it to that. --TylerBurden (talk) 08:36, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 30 August 2023 

message: Zlatan has an instagram account 152.93.100.243 (talk) 10:55, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Also note WP:NOSOCIAL. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 11:26, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 25 September 2023
Talk:Aero Contractors (United States)

message: Reported on Democracy Now!: a Spanish newspaper has published the names of three employees of Aero Contractors: Eric Fain, James Fairing and Kirk James Bird. Should this be added to the article? Badagnani 07:00, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, and I refuse to detail why. Sorry. WaldiR (talk) 20:33, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Employees

message: Source if anyone is interested. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 05:57, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  WaPo story
Talk:Negative Approach

message: After re-reading this article, I felt that the "chapters" were too small, and the headings not really appropriate.  I put the second section first, outlining the band's sound, and then collapsed secs. 1, 3 and 4 into the new "History."  I think it flows better this way. Justin Bailey 17:03, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In an interview, Pete Zelewski claims that it was the Brannon/McCullough/Zelewski/Zuheir lineup that recorded "Lost Cause" for Process of Elimination.  If this is true, it would follow that that lineup also recorded the first demo, since, to my knowledge, that came before PoE.  However, I have found no corroborating evidence elsewhere.  Can someone verify this?  Apparently the Ready To Fight rarities album has good liner notes--does anyone have this record?  Maybe the answer's there. Justin Bailey 14:55, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Help!

message: After making the below edit, I decided to overhaul the page.  I took my info from American Hardcore and the interviews on the KFTH page linked to below (mostly). Justin Bailey 14:55, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion
Talk:Normal lens

message: I would like a bit more why? on this article. Will try to add it, but I cant find any good sources so far. Photographers tend to be not very technical alas. Why is this true about the human eye? And is the whole thing about the diagonal a myth? I cant see that 6x6 and 6x9 say dont project the same view, just more of it. Or am I wrong? Justinc 00:01, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Why?

message: Definitely needs a split between TV lenses (were movie standards works) and digital still phototography. Ericd 20:15, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Digital photography section

message: This page could do with a diagram showing a regular-sized picture held at a regular viewing distance taken with a normal lens with the scene of which it is a picture behind it. This would show that it approximately subtends the same angle of view as the image itself and hence approximates the view. —Ben FrantzDale (talk) 15:13, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: JamesMcArdle 05:30, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diagram 

message: It is stated that "50mm is the simplest optical design possible for a lens". Can we have a reference for this? I don't know anything about lens design, but it seems like a pretty broad assertion.
Markwads (talk) 14:51, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, it's lame, though probably has roots in something true, like that a slightly long normal lens is pretty easy to design.  I'll take it out. Dicklyon (talk) 15:32, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Film still section 

message: I have introduced new section headings and rearranged things for clarity, adding more detail on why matching the vision of the human eye with a manufactured lens is problematic and pointing to some useful references.  However I have separated text that has no references, and that confusingly contradicts the rest of the article, into its own section "The image circle". Its argument seems to be a red herring and the text was inserted by an anonymous editor 70.55.205.168 around 3 September 2017. Unless someone can track down the relevance and authority of this passage, I suggest it be removed. While it remains I don't think the article should be classed as anything but a 'Start'. What do other editors think? Thank you, Jamesmcardle(talk) 07:46, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sections and query about relevance of the image circle 

message: A better explanation for "why these focal lengths" can be found in [this paper](https://jov.arvojournals.org/article.aspx?articleid=2192052): distortion seems to go away when viewers view pictures at/near the center-of-projection, and these focal lengths match viewers' preferred viewing distances.  I think this should be added to the article. That paper also lists problems with the conventional explanations. Aaronh (talk) 19:10, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explanation for "why"
Talk:J curve

message: To Discotropico and 212.202.233.19...I object to the classification of the J Curve as "neoconservative".  As it appeared to be original research, I've removed the references (on J Curve justification for war, neoconservative link, etc...) for NPOV reasons.  Care to elaborate on your reasoning? JGray 21:41, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neoconservative?? 

message: Obviously a J curve is a mathematical entity first, and a statistical phenomenon second. How is a J curve described mathematically? We need sources for all phenomena that are presently referred to as "J curves". It sounds almost like a prescription for crankery. JFW | T@lk 19:22, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. I looked for any actual mathematics in the article and found only vague references to the 'J-shaped curve'. And every curve shown is quite different in its shape from every other, unsurprisingly as there is no precise definition of Or equation for a 'J-shaped curve', unlikely actual mathematically defined concepts. The curve would seem to be more at home in imprecise / opinion-based / disciplines such as social sciences, politics, economics in which many different theories can co-exist to explain observations since they're are rarely uniquely verifiable.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.185.46.237 (talk) 08:25, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mathematical description

message: We how about we move the stuff about Medicine to another page.  The Economics page should be separate from the MedicineMondaymonkey1 (talk) 21:58, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Medicine
Talk:Thread management

message: How much overlap with the thread article should there be in this article? Maybe this should just be a redirect to that article? Tarheelcoxn Thurs 15 Dec 00:08 UTC
Tossed in the merge suggestion. I think 99% of people who don't know what "thread management" is would understand it if they knew what a "thread" is. Tarheelcoxn 01:49, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:CJSW-FM

message: I believe that the Radio boys and the short wave mystery would be better in this article as it adds context.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Newestalex (talk • contribs) 19:03, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Strong CP problem

message: This article fails to motivate why this is a problem. Why should one expect θ to be non-zero? Sems perfectly natural to have a zero here, so the declaration that "there's a problem here" is unconvincing as currently worded. linas 00:17, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: what is blud saying 💀💀 181.192.37.72 (talk) 15:25, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Motivation

message: How on earth is Bars's two time physics related to the strong CP problem? If some latter work  made a connection, cite that work, but that paper is irrelevant. I'm removing the ref and putting in the Peccei-Quinn ref. Dewa (talk) 01:08, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Irrelevant ref?

message: How was the cited [Banerjee, H; Chatterjee, D; Mitra, P (30 October 2003). "Is there still a strong CP problem?". Physics Letters B. 573: 109–114. arXiv:hep-ph/0012284] received by other physicists ? - Rod57 (talk) 16:51, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: According to Inspire it has been cited 22 times (cf 3817 for the Peccei-Quinn paper, which even accounting for its age is vastly more) --- I can't see how this is any more relevant than any other proposed solution. I am going to remove reference to it. Asymptotickle (talk) 16:04, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  How was the 2003 solution received  

message: I rewrote the main body of the article to explain how the strong CP problem actually comes about and especially what part of the θ-angle is physical. I also then went into explaining why the different proposed solutions are indeed solutions to the problem. This is an important topic so it deserves to have a proper detailed article written about it. OpenScience709 (talk) 20:13, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major rewrite
Talk:Simplon Pass

message: There did not appear to be a separate article for the Simplon tunnel. Rather than adding yet another stub, I decided that I could add the information here, on the assumption that anyone looking for the tunnel would be likely enough to find the pass. Vremya 00:25, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: There is now a separate article for Simplon Tunnel as of Feb 2007.  --Seattle Skier (talk) 06:28, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Tunnel
Talk:Dillinger Four

message: Kept the original paragraph describing the band, but put it all into the standard Music/Band template, and padded out the relevant sections. I'll probably come back to this at some point and expand on the overall description and add some info about the albums. Excursus 00:30, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  December 2005 

message: paddy is famous for gettin naked on stage. i am sure someone could find sources for this info and add it to the article. --208.103.185.104 16:20, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nudity 

message: "Hilarious stage banter" and "full frontal nudity" have no sources and seem like an advertisement. Removing it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.246.86.10 (talk) 03:27, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stage banter & nudity
Talk:Gog (DC Comics)

message: Does anyone know why the Quintessence gave him his powers? It seems like an odd decision for a bunch of omnipotent types to make and a fairly big detail to be missing from the article.
I have reverted an revised changes which Sharkface217 undid. I assume his reasoning for the undo was because the added info contained Gogs projected involvement in Final crisis (something that seems obvious, but has not been officially announced.  I removed all predictions and made the added info stick to only the facts given in JSA #14.  I did like the addition of the fact that the origin of Gog in pre-infinite crisis does not match this current version.  Now that the addition has been fixed, I hope that anyone who edits this adds two it and does not simply revert it.  If you do revert something, explain your reasoning so we don't get into and editing war.  Thanks IthinkIwannaLeia (talk) 20:37, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quintessence 

message: I removed some speculation on the third Gog's allege evil motives.  Even if the reasoning is sound, articles are not supposed to "solve mysteries" prior to the story explaining them outright.  The "voice" the articles should be written in is a descriptive one, not one that draws conclusions or makes judgements, however obvious they might seem.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.189.197.62 (talk) 03:07, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Watch the POV
Talk:Urban unit

message: Would you care to explain why removing the last phrase is an improvement? Your UN phrase is seems still out of context where it's placed - fix this at least please. ThePromenader 00:43, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the last sentence because it is simply totally factually wrong. France was not "one of the first countries to comply with UN population measurement reccomendations". And the aire urbaine has nothing to do with UN recommendations. As for the "it is hopeful" part, that's just your opinion, but it is not a fact. Hardouin 15:14, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  That's fine. Now can you remove the extra "UN 200 metres" statement please? It's repeated twice. ThePromenader 21:20, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  Never mind, I did it myself. Hardouin, the international inconsistencies should be ported to the "urban area" page, but you seem hesitant to disclose that sort of clarifying information. If you do not, then, after I do the needed research, I will do so myself. ThePromenader 15:39, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Last revision
Talk:Robert Cook (veterinarian)

message: Unless there's more to say about this person, indicating how they are notable, I think this should be a candidate for Metaweb:Votes for Deletion. --Zippy 00:59, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: December 2005

message: Well, I created a really too brief stub. I was editing Hiltrud Strasser, and dr Cook is co-author of a very important book with dr Strasser (Metal in the mouth) after many years of study of serious damages to horses from any kind of bit. He is a veterinarian surgeon, Professor Emeritus at Tuft University, and his work - in my opinion - is one from the very first scientific contribution about this matter. His website is very important, with many articles and scientific contribution.   
Obviously, a topic only important for "horse addicts" - but here, VERY important. 
Please wait some days before deleting the page - I'm hardly working about a project about horses in it.wiki.--Alex brollo 19:13, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  About dr Robert Cook 

message: I posted a draft version of the article today. Please edit my English!--Alex brollo 06:57, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Draft article done
Talk:De Havilland Canada DHC-4 Caribou

message: Seems to be a contradiction in the first paragraph, i.e. the US Army called it the CV-2, but the US military called it the C-7. 69.225.162.92 01:04, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Contradiction

message: According to this Caribous are in operation with Ansett MAL, but Ansett ceased all operations in September 2001. (203.27.52.242 (talk) 23:34, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It is not a list of "current" operators but a list of all that have operated the type. MilborneOne (talk) 12:27, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ansett MAL 

message: Removed statement about Brazilian Air Force Caribou fleet, since Brazil never operated the type. Someone mixed up the things a little bit: Brazilian Air Force operated DHC-5 Buffalos not Caribous. RobertoRMola (talk) 14:43, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Brazilian Fleet

message: Why no further detail? The design origins, the construction methods (was it wood, all-metal, what?), STOL features (full length flaps? Drooping ailerons?) What makes it so superb at STOL performance? Why the high wing? Maybe note the fact that the distinctive "high tail" was included to allow very high angles-of-attack on landing and take-off while avoiding tail strikes.....45Colt 09:19, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Like all these article they are a work in progress and it just means nobody has got around to expanding it yet, if you have reliable sources then you are welcome to improve the article. MilborneOne (talk) 15:29, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  More detail 

message: You're comparing here the DHC-4 with the C-160? Whose capacity is 16000 kg, about 3 tons more than the DHC-4's MTOW of 12927 kg? How? --46.114.0.198 (talk) 22:34, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aircraft of comp. role, config. and era
Talk:Burlington Transit

message: Whether it's liked or not, there are a number of entries for Transit Systems across Ontario, Canada, and worldwide......
Burlington Transit had a good site but disappeared....
Bacl-presby 01:07, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Why reinstate??
Talk:VoodooPC

message: I think someone should change the name of the company where used to be Voodoo PC or VoodooPC —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.120.229.186 (talk • contribs) 19:08, 4 March 2006
i deleted a sentence in competition cos it the same sentence was already in the introduction
212.120.229.186 19:10, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Zzblue, please read the NPOV page before reposting about the sexism complaint. Eric.d.dixon 03:06, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think it would be hard to justify a machine with an integrated graphics processor that shares system memory as a gaming machine.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.253.104.170 (talk) 21:16, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Envy 133 as a gaming machine. 

message: http://store.hp.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/us/en/mdp/Laptops/omen-15  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 15.219.233.72 (talk) 06:17, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Omen is BACK BABY 

message: Merge this page
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=HP_Omen&redirect=no  — Preceding unsigned comment added by KuronoX (talk • contribs) 01:14, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lower casing Omen 

message: HP Omen is NOT a company and NOT a sibsidiary of HP.
It's a product line of high-end gaming PC manufactured by HP Inc., as mentioned at the top of the article.
Currently, HP does not have any subsidiary named "Omen" or "Voodoo", please see here.
So this should be either an article about the product line, then all info about the company should be removed;
or an article about the currently defunct Voodoo Computers Inc.
The Omen website https://www.omen.com/us/en.html mentions the company HP Development L.P. at the bottom, but that's, most likely, just the name of the organization that runs the website. All external links (policies etc.) redirect to the HP website.
So it's decided. VoodooPC and HP Omen will be separate page.KuronoX (talk) 03:49, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multiple issues with this article
Talk:Selby District

message: Any special reason why there is a Selby (district) page, separate from the main Selby page? I don't really see the logic in it: most local authorities comprise more than one settlement and it's a simple matter to incorporate these things into the main article. It already appears to be causing confusion to the extent that one contributor has added material about the Abbey on the district page, something which is already amply covered in the main page. I propose a merger. --Archstanton 01:12, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair enough.--Archstanton 14:28, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

text: Done.--Archstanton 14:28, 16 December 2005 (UTC)