Talk:Danielle Rousseau

message: I have a placed a request for meditation for this discussion on Wikipedia:Requests for mediation. If you would like to participate please place visit that page for further instructions. —Joseph | Talk 23:08, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I do not think mediation is necessary.  I would prefer a request for comment first. Jtrost (T | C | #) 01:21, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

text: I completely agree. Mediation wasn't even discussed or mentioned before it was filed, which is similar to how the article changes were made as well. RfC seems more appropriate at this stage anyway, at least the way I read the tone of the discussion so far. -- PKtm 05:24, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

text: I agree as well.  I've also read over Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) and I honestly cannot see how you believe that Danielle warrants her own page at this point.  In fact, it seems to me that those folks who created a "Mona Simpson" article also did not read Wikipedia:Notability (fiction).  For example, from the article: Lionel Hutz from The Simpsons is a minor character, and is covered in a list of minor characters.  Lionel Hutz has appeared on The Simpsons many more times than Homer's mother.  Yet, there in the article, it clearly states he should not have his own article (even though, he apparently does -- thus completely flying in the face of Wikipedia:Notability (fiction)).  Danielle is still a minor character (as of now) and her section can fit cleanly into a list of minor characters.  There is not enough information about her to warrant an encyclopedia article.  If you think her section is too long, I agree with PKtm and JTrost in that it can be edited for quality. Danflave 18:11, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, if Rose and Bernard can get their own pages, then why not Rosseau, who is arguably a more important character? I dont see what the problem is...its not like its using up too much space or anything... ~ Unfortunate
I agree.  This is completely pathetic, it just seems like some weird power trip by these people who have ordained themselves as the official Lost wikipedia editors.  Since there is already a Lost Wikipedia, seperate from this, and the editors there have decided to give Danielle her own page, what seems to be the fucking problem? - Shaft121 19:55, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request of mediation 

message: This article has been ping-ponging back and forth, since at least March 28, from a redirect (to the Characters of Lost page) to a separate article on Rousseau.  This is senseless.  I'd like to encourage everyone with a "dog in this hunt" to reread the relevant discussion above, and let's have a civil dialog on how to settle the issue, rather than just head to yet another revert action.  
Here's my start: the original "status quo", established 6 months ago (12 November 2005) was that Rousseau was included in the Characters of Lost page, and a redirect was established to that article, to accommodate anyone who might search on her name.  As of 27 March 2006, an editor decided to make a separate article, and a number of people immediately objected in the talk page here and in Talk:Characters of Lost.  Any attempts to reestablish the original status quo (the redirect, in other words) have been repeatedly reverted.  My stance is that the status quo needs to prevail until further civil discussion occurs on the relative merits of the two sides in this conflict. -- PKtm 06:01, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The problem I have with this being its own article is that Danielle has not had a starring credit in the series yet, and that has been established as a standard for deciding if a character receives his or her own page (Rose and Bernard are a special case though).  If Danielle has her own page, then who next?  Sooner or later we'll have character pages that only have a few sentences of content because there will be no standard for determining what merits a character having a separate page. Jtrost (T | C | #) 12:04, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

text: I still do not understand how creating ANOTHER article about this character resolves this issue.  If anything it makes the situation worse.  What other information do want you included in Danielle's bio?  As far as I am concerned it contains a sufficient amount of information relative to the character's impact on the overall story.  We cannot have much more information about her without filling her bio with fancruft. Jtrost (T | C | #) 11:55, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

text: I don't think it matters to me anymore really.  I've just had great news about my family life.  Great speaking to you guys & having a challenge of wills as it were but I'm going to be a dad & have to get my priorities in order!  Good luck with the whole Lost thing, maybe I'll drop in at one time & add my two cents (as long as it doesn't contrave the regs).  Take care guys - Shaft121 18:08, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Repeated reverts 

message: :Can you please explain this? Jtrost (T | C | #) 13:09, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What I mean is why did you create a second page?  I would also like to know why you copy and pasted information from Lostpedia onto here when we have our own (i.e. better) information. Jtrost (T | C | #) 17:39, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright?

message: In case you missed it: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danielle Rousseau.  --thedemonhog 19:12, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article for Deletion 

message: I added a relevance tag over it since this section doesn't give any referances (specualative information) and the way it is written, makes it look more like a post on a message board rather than a neutral information section. 129.16.49.2 (talk) 12:07, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question section

message: *TV Guide - Six questions about Lost's Danielle Rousseau
*Speculating on what's inside the bunker on ABC's Lost
*After 3 long seasons, they meet
*After Croatia, Furlan has found new life in Lost
Just thought I'd list them here for future use. Feel free to add more. Corn.u.co.pia / Disc.us.sion 04:56, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resources 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Danielle Rousseau. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090123131113/http://www.syfyportal.com/pagetogether.php?id=4850&page=2 to http://www.syfyportal.com/pagetogether.php?id=4850&page=2
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:22, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified