Talk:10 (Southern Cross Austereo)

message: Can anyone confirm the bit about STV8? I suspect the ownership bit is incorrect. matturn 13:08, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope. It's all true. STV-8 Mildura was once part of the Eight and Ten Network/Eight Network that utimately became Southern Cross Ten. It was sold to ENT, and joined BTV-6 and GMV-6 as part of VIC TV. BigDan 12:12, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Me dissenting again... is the WA story true? There was some similar but incorrect stuff in the Imparja entry recently. matturn 12:26, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  STV8 ownership 

message: Why do we in Victoria have to put up with Sydneycentric news on weekends and public holidays? You have lost me.
:Due to AFL Broadcast Timing, there is no local bulletin ready (The Half Time Bulletin in Melbourne is produced too late for SC 10 to Air in the proper time) at time of broadcast, thus they take the Sydney-Centric one. - Boochan 18:07, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  News 

message: Regarding the lack of Southern Cross Ten in Griffith, it has nothing to do with Southern Cross Ten. It has everything to do with the federal Government's ACMA. If ACMA issued another commercial TV licence for the Griffith/MIA area, it would almost certainly result in a full-time Ten service becoming available there. Lobby Canberra, not Southern Cross Broadcasting. matturn 12:23, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually this is inncorrect because the Griffith council requested that the Wagga broadcasting licence be extended, and they were advised that this was a viable option, however SCT declined due to it not being perceived as financially viable. Mrguru1211  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrguru1211 (talk • contribs) 08:50, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Griffith 

message: Over the last 24 hours or so all the non-network related history has been split off into stations' relevant articles - this makes it a bit easier to follow the history of the actual network itself.
I've also made a few changes to the Availability section - just altering the wording of the first paragraph to make it a little clearer and moving the second over to an unordered list (it's more appropriate and it reads slightly better).
What I plan to do now is try and expand the history section again and find some references for it. timgraham 10:06, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good work TimG! the article looks good :). I have removed BCV, as this station call-sign does no longer exist; upon aggregation BCV became GLV. The history section however, needs to be greatly expanded, as at current the article is only 10kb long. Stickeylabel 10:33, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The history section contains all the detail I could find at the time, I'll keep digging later..BCV is actually still in use as well (a search at  lists 24 instances). timgraham 10:37, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Your right about BCV :P . I have therefore moved GLV (TV station) to GLV/BCV, where an article about both of the similar stations can be discussed. Stickeylabel 10:52, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes 

message: It was announced on 29 April 2016 that Southern Cross will switch its primary affiliation from Network Ten to the Nine Network (note that this does not affect remote Seven affiliate Southern Cross Television). Despite the fact that Southern Cross will not create unique branding once they switch affiliation, I believe that the article should still be renamed Southern Cross Nine (SC9) on 1 July 2016 as this article is still separate from Southern Cross TV and SC9 is the best name to be used in this scenario (unless a different business name is created to refer to the network). Thoughts? – Nick Mitchell 98 talk 05:19, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name upon affiliation switch 

message: You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Australian Wikipedians' notice board#WIN and SC Ten.  JSH-alive/talk/cont/mail 11:05, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion at [[Wikipedia:Australian Wikipedians' notice board#WIN and SC Ten]]

message: This page was reverted to Southern Cross Nine over the poorly constructed case for moving it back to "Southern Cross Ten". Upon the 2016 media shakeup, all Southern Cross stations that were affiliated to Network Ten (except for Northern NSW and South Australia) changed affiliation to the Nine Network and took on generic Nine branding. Consequently, the page was moved to "Southern Cross Nine" to reflect this change despite the fact that the stations are not identified as such; this name was selected as it is only relevant name to be assigned as the bulk of the stations are now affiliated with the Nine Network. The Southern Cross Ten brand has ceased to exist, as has been noted in the article, however, keeping the article as "Southern Cross Ten" does not permit for further updates to the stations now affiliated with the Nine Network.
The stations remain operated by an affiliate as a regional network, only if a company merge between regional and metropolitan networks occurs should such regional network articles cease to be relevant. Until such a time, they remain equivalent to their metropolitan counterparts and thus need their own separate and relevant articles. Further discussion can be made below. – Nick Mitchell 98 talk 12:55, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Concerning page move to "Southern Cross Ten" 

message: To clear up any potential confusion among editors as to why the Nine Network logo is not permitted for use in this article, let me present my case here so that any future editors can see this and understand the situation.
Back in February 2016, I was notified about the use of the logo of Network Ten in the articles Network Ten, Ten Network Holdings and articles of Ten's metropolitan stations. Such usage failed Wikipedia's guidelines of unacceptable use of non-free content, specifically §17:  This means that the article of a child entity or subsidiary cannot use the logo of its parent organisation if it does not have its own logo. Even though Southern Cross and the Nine Network are not the same company, this restriction still applies (recognising SC as the "child entity" and Nine Network as the "parent entity") and consequently, the Nine Network logo cannot be used in this article.
The complete original discussion concerning the Network Ten logo can be found here for further clarification.
Hopefully this clears up any confusion, if there are still any questions, please post them here. Regards. – Nick Mitchell 98 talk 09:39, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of Nine Network logo in the infobox 

message: It’s Network 10’s logo Bassie f (talk) 06:11, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The network logo isn’t SCA’s own 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Southern Cross Nine and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 21#Southern Cross Nine until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Bassie f (talk) 20:35, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Southern Cross Nine" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Ten Capital News and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 27#Ten Capital News until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Bassie f (talk) 22:22, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Ten Capital News" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]