Talk:Randy Orton/Archive 2

message: I noticed this page was added for the "requests for assessment" on the WP:PW assessment page. I'd agree with the current assessment as a B article. Suggestions for improvement:
*Put the citations behind the punctuation instead of before (which they are currently).
*Most of the current sources are wrestling results. Try to get other sources from places like SLAM! Wrestling, interviews, books, etc. to help with information other than merely match results.
*Try to make a more well-rounded article by fleshing out the information on his early-life and backstage life (there is a little bit, but more is needed).
*Fix the current citation templates. Wikipedia:Citation templates will help with that.
These suggestions will really help out the article. Nikki311 21:28, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for assessment 

message: Legend Killer should be seperated from this article, because it details all the legends being killed, and goes on to be a long article. If they are merged, it will take essence away from both articles. We can mention the other article, and write "Main Article: Legend Killer" in a paragraph in this article.Lex94 13:02, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No it shouldn't!!!! Why not make a new section in Orton's article and headline it: Legends Killed? There's no need to create an article for "Legend Killer"!!!! --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:08, 05 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legend Killer article

message: In the Legend Killer section, Chris Benoit should be removed. I think killing your family doesn't qualify you as a "Legend". Tech43 00:23, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It means he highly focuses on "killing" legends. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 15:08, 01 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chris Benoit 

message: Orton is the No. 1 contender for the WWE Championship. Shouldn't that be mentioned somewhere? Calgary 20:16, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is MENTIONED. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 19:00, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

text: Where in the article does is state that? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:25, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: No. 1 Contender

message: Should it be noted that Randy was the final member of a winning Survivor Series team in the 2003-2005 events, as well as the final member of his team (wich lost) at the 2006 Survivor Series? This seems like a fairly impressive accomplishment to me, but I'm not positive as to Wikipedia's policy on mentioning such things. Nearphotison 08:47, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That should be noted in the Survivor Series page. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 17:36, 01 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Survivor Series runs 

message: OK, I'm quite new to this, so I don't know exactly how it works, but I was reading through this article and IMHO it's in a really good state.  So what's the procedure for pushing it towards GA? Does it get peer reviewed? Do I nominate it somehow? Cheers, Fatjabba 12:05, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a problem with the citations, someone has linked the date & year in the title of the match results which is problematic (and against policy) see what happens is that if the title of the page is "Raw 16-6-2006" and 16-6-2006 is wikilinked then only the word "Raw" actually links you to the cited article so "Raw" instead of "Raw 16-6-2006", that needs to be fixed before this can even hope to become a GA and that's just the first and most obvious issue MPJ-DK 05:10, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review? 

message: On wwe.com, they are referencing him now as the Legend Destroyer instead of the Legend Killer. I think its because of the Chris Benoit tragedy. They even got rid of the Legend Killer page on the site. I believe that we should be called as the Legend Destroyer here also, and we may reference his past nickname, the Legend Killer Lex94 18:46, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Just because the website removed "Legend Killer" doesn't mean anything. Until they make note on that on RAW then we'll make the change. But until then, he still is being referred to as Legend Killer. And one other thing, on RAW, Vince said that the WWE is being investigated and maybe that's why they removed Legend Killer to Legend Destroyer. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:44, 09 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legend Killer or Legend Destroyer? 

message: it says in the article that Graham encouraged him to fight the Undertaker, but since Graham is a legend, I'm wondering, was he challenged personally by Randy, or did he come just to give advice?--Screwball23 talk 21:32, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it was for advice. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:37, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, I assumed so because Graham is pretty old and I never remember any type of feud. If you have an old magazine source or info on the two, let me know.--Screwball23 talk 21:55, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll see to it. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:57, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

text: I found this one. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:03, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  billy graham 

message: I know, I made up the title, but the entire reason I did was because of hindsight about what he is now. When he was a face, he showed little promise for making it big. Maybe the section should be renamed because at the time, he really wan't making an impact. "Un-promising face is more like it.--Screwball23 talk 23:04, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  promising face? 

message: On Rob Van Dam's page, it is stated that the injury he suffered from a DDT to the concrete was legit, yet here it is stated it was kayfabe. Since neither are sourced, which is it? This needs fixing. Kevinazite 09:14, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, on RVD's page it states that he suffered a "legit" concussion; so I add it it here. But I'm not sure if he in fact suffered one or not. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 16:45, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Conflicting Information