lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:David H. Hubel

message: Shouldn't there be some mention in the article about the cruelties conducted by Hubel and Wiesel in their hundreds, if not thousands, of experiments on felines, both adults and kittens, in pursuit of science? Their experiments are no longer permitted by modern scientists because of the cruelties that were exuded under the guise of research, prior to modern standards of humanity being applied. Many of their experiments were downright cruel, and obviously destructive to the animals they experimented with, as they freely inserted electrodes and other electrical devices inside the animals brains. Many of the animals were vegetables afterwards. Hubel was prolific, and used to have all of his experiments and papers posted for download until he passed away, but he had literally hundreds of papers posted for free download, and they were almost all about cats and kittens. This article would not be very accurate or truthful, if that information continues to be omitted. Stevenmitchell (talk) 23:23, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hubel and Wiesel Cruelty to Cats
Talk:Nerang River

message: Oh yuck. I live on the Gold Coast; this article REALLY needs cleanup. TydeNet 11:13, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: File:StateLibQld 1 15058 Steamship, Tweed, entering the Nerang River at Southport, 1892.jpg
Southport, 1892 Mouth of the Nerang River at Southport on the Gold Coast. | ... Category:Nerang River Category:Coasts of Australia Category: ...
(1,000 × 722 (75 KB)) - 08:59, 30 May 2013
File:Queensland State Archives 459 Nerang River Southport January 1934.png
1930-1939 name Place | value 1 Gold Coast City name Material Type | ... material from the Queensland State Archives Category:Australia in the 1930s ...
(720 × 309 (166 KB)) - 04:01, 2 April 2013
File:Queensland State Archives 4682 Nerang River Southport June 1952.png
1950-1959 name Place | value 1 Gold Coast City name Material Type | ... material from the Queensland State Archives Category:Australia in the 1950s ...
(720 × 501 (153 KB)) - 04:08, 2 April 2013
--Andys'edtits 16:10, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: wiki pics for extending history

message: A new green bridge between Surfers Paradise and Chevron Island was completed in 2020. The article currently doesn't mention it. - Shiftchange (talk) 00:59, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  New crossing
Talk:Charles Brenton Huggins

message: A Google search gets 11,300 hits for "Charles Brenton Huggins" and only 75 for "Charles Breton Huggins". Unless anyone can verify the "Breton" spelling, this needs to be corrected. The redirects are at Charles Brenton Huggins; Huggins, Charles Brenton; Charles Huggins; and Charles B. Huggins. I think the correct location for the article is Charles Brenton Huggins.
Looking at the page history, the move happened with this edit on 18 July 2006.
I've put in a request for the page to be moved (it needs an admin to move to where a redirect is located). I'll add a link in a minute. Carcharoth 15:58, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Page move request filed at Wikipedia:Requested_moves#19_July_2006. Carcharoth 16:21, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Middle name - Breton or Brenton? 

message: I didn't misspell the name when I made the move to his fullname. The name was changed after I moved the page!
# 12:11, July 19, 2006 Carcharoth (Talk | contribs) (correct spelling of middle name)
# (cur) (last) 16:35, July 18, 2006 Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (Talk | contribs) m (moved Charles B. Huggins to Charles Breton Huggins)
::I apologise. You did not make a typo. You copied the spelling in the article, which is the right thing to do. However, the spelling in the article (at the time you did the move) was wrong. The spelling was not corrected until I spotted the mistake. I, for one, will be checking things a lot more closely on Wikipedia, and not assuming that article names have the right spelling. Checking spelling of names with an external source is always a good idea. Carcharoth 22:46, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Hey, wait a minute!

message: I've just removed a line saying that "Breton" is an alternative spelling. I can find no reputable source (other than Wikipedia mirrors) that give the "Breton" spelling. Please find a source before adding this back to the article. Thanks. Carcharoth 22:52, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Breton or Brenton - again 
Talk:Bangka Island

message: # Delicacies:
 1. Fresh Seafoods.
 2. Martabak Bangka.
# Lodging:
 1. Pangkalpinang:
    - Bumi Asih Hotel, Wisma Jaya Hotel, Centrym Hotel.
 2. Sungailiat:
    - Parai Beach Resort, Tanjung Pesona Resort.
# Traditional Beliefs:
 1. Kepun - is a belief of just touching the food that are offered to the guest from the house tenants.
Kyo4eva
:Oppose. This is encyclopaedia, not tourist page. Please go to :Wikitravel:Bangka instead. — Indon (reply) — 10:39, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal of addition of sub - topics on main page. 

message: To avoid confusion by the readers, I removed chinese spelling of town names in the island. Please go to the town's (city)'s article to add the spelling with the requirement that the alternative spelling is officially used in the town. — Indon (reply) — 10:45, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chinese spelling of town names 

message: Bangka Belitung Province consist of Bangka Island and Belitung Island, but due to it is a small province, separate from South Sumatra Province, so I suggest to merge Bangka Island to Bangka-Belitung Islands.Gsarwa (talk) 11:12, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: Please add population percentages to the demography section. Jidanni (talk) 17:40, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Demography percentages
Talk:François Jacob

message: Citation
Where do these figures of 405 yeast proteins being involved in transcriptional regulation (Research) come from? Thanks. 82squaremetres (talk) 14:47, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Does anyone know, which was Jacob's real date of death? The article currently states (after ) that he died April 20th (so does the French Academy ), but according to many other (for example The New York Times , The Guardian , The Independent  and even Nobelprize.org ) he died earlier, April 19th, which makes me wonder if the article has currently a wrong date. ,,n (talk) 13:40, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of death 
Talk:Ian Stevenson

message: We have a similar but less egregious case for Carl Sagan. Our text says:Carl Sagan, in his book The Demon-Haunted World, referred to what were apparently Stevenson's investigations as an example of carefully collected empirical data, and though he rejected reincarnation as a parsimonious explanation for the stories, he wrote that the phenomenon of alleged past-life memories should be further researched. [emphasis supplied]The text in italic has no support from either of the sources cited. Again, I've revised the text to bring it in line with what Sagan actually wrote. And again, if you think what I've done should be improved, please let's first discuss.
Cordially, O Govinda (talk) 10:01, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  What Carl Sagan really said
Talk:Arthur Kornberg

message: Although Kornberg served in the Coast Guard during the World War II era, there are no reliable sources found as of yet state that he was in a war zone during the war. More specifically, the sources do not establish defining role in World War II. Accordingly, "Category:United States Coast Guard personnel of World War II" was removed until a defining role is established. Semper Fi! FieldMarine (talk) 13:01, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: World War II service

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that :File:Arthur Kornberg (30828410210) - restoration1.jpg, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for October 26, 2022. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2022-10-26. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! --Ahecht (TALKPAGE) 21:01, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured picture scheduled for POTD
Talk:Albrecht Kossel

message: Article seems to have texted lifted from this oft-cited source, as shown by the duplication detector report. Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:50, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I have reviewed the report and all instances look ok to my inexperienced eyes. The source and the article are, after all, about the same subject.Jarhed (talk) 22:00, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

text: The citation is indeed an excellent one and this article is shot through with references to it.Jarhed (talk) 22:02, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not quite set in stone, but stuff like "young their son walther was born in 1888 and their daughter gertrude in 1889" (which is in both texts) should be rephrased, perhaps "... young. Walther, their son, was born in 1888, followed in 1889 by their daughter Gertrude." Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:30, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I made this plus some other changes, please review.Jarhed (talk) 04:17, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Close paraphrasing
Talk:Gradius Arcade Soundtrack

message: I'm not sure if this soundtrack names it as that, but I think it should be mentioned that that is its official name. Buzda 19:41, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: See . I'll see about adding a note somewhere in the article. ~ Vic Vipr 20:50, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Isn't the boss music called "Aircraft Carrier"?
Talk:Rocky Mountain Way (album)

message: :Image:Rockyjoe.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
I think everybody has good ideas. For rizzle.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.241.110.124 (talk) 23:14, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Rockyjoe.jpg

message: There should be separate articles for the song, Rocky Mountain Way, and the compilation album of the same title. Zariane (talk) 16:45, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the song is more notable than the compilation album, so if there is to be a split, the album info should be moved to Rocky Mountain Way (album). However, the album isn't very notable, and creating a stub for it is required only by Wikipedia's rock music editors' conventions, not by WP:NOTE or WP:NOT. / edg ☺ ☭ 17:35, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The move issue should hinge both on keeping the edit history with the appropriate article and determining the primary topic of "Rocky Mountain Way."  :Rocky Mountain Way was first created as an article about the album but soon became priamrily about the song.  From then, most edits had to do with the song.  As User:Edgarde pointed out above, the primary meaning seems to be the song rather than the album so oppose the move.  Keep the song at "Rocky Mountain Way" and move the album info to a new Rocky Mountain Way (album) article. —  AjaxSmack  18:57, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose move and also oppose creation of disambig page. Agree with AjaxSmack and Edgarde that the song is the primary meaning of the name Rocky Mountain Way, the album is later, named after the song and, most important, not nearly so well known. This article is primarily about the song and should stay that way. Agree with AjaxSmack, the edit history should stay with the song article, so there should be no move. DAB is unnecessary as there is no third meaning, so a hatnote will do. Support split, the album is deserving of an article in its own right; Agree that Rocky Mountain Way (album) is the best name for this new article. Andrewa (talk) 19:23, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:Adoption and Safe Families Act

message: I have correctly placed this article here with all CAPS in the title. Please advise on how to deal with many articles with different locations dUe tO the usE Of cApItAlS. Alll help with editing and so on is welcome please! cpswarrior 11:38, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Here it is

message: — Assignment last updated by Ajdel (talk) 16:24, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Capstone Course in American Politics
Talk:Coilover

message: I am not an expert on the technology but even I notice a few things about coilovers that are missing.
A special tool is typically required to adjust them.
Some require periodic adjustment.
Some people cut the springs down to make a sheap adjustment.
And most of all where are the sources for what is provided?
138.163.128.41 (talk) 17:38, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need more information 

message: As it currently appears, the article makes the point (several times) that coilovers are not to be confused with struts or other arrangements that include a spring and a shock absorber (damper).  However, no attempt is made to explain how a coilover is different from these other arrangements.
As I understand it, a MacPherson strut can be replaced with a a coilover (coil-over?) unit, but what exactly does that mean since a 'regular' MacPherson strut is also composed of a coil spring surrounding a shock absorber?  It can't just be that the components of a coilover are "matched up" when they are assembled, as this is also true of MacPherson struts.  Indeed, even cars that do not employ a MacPherson strut also have coil springs and shock aborsbers and these are also "matched up" by the car's manufacturer.
People speak of doing a "coilover conversion" implying that this will somehow reconfigure the suspension of a car in a way that goes beyond merely changing the springs and shock aborsbers.  I had hoped that this article would explain coilovers sufficiently so that this could be more fully understood.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.80.89.156 (talk) 11:20, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article fails to define the term... 

message: I added some advantages and disadvantages I also added the adjustability of a coil over that people were asking for.Aj5723 (talk) 01:49, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  new post 

message: I added new sections to help expand on defining coilovers. ChristianB925 (talk) 19:45, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Sections
Talk:Barry Adamson

message: There are soundtracks mentioned in the Biography section which are not listed in the Discography.76.166.178.9 (talk) 08:40, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discography

message: Is there anything to justify Buzzcocks as an associated act? The only link I'm aware of is being in a band with someone who was previously in the Buzzcocks, which isn't enough.--Michig (talk) 21:31, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: He replaced bassist Steve Garvey (i don't know why) during a brief time in 1978.Francodamned (talk) 21:45, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

text: Correction, he replaced Garth Smith in 1977 as a brief time member, while the "classic" Steve Garvey was auditioning.Francodamned (talk) 21:45, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Buzzcocks? 

message: Nothing seems to me said about what he did during the  1990's. scope_creep (talk) 12:17, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The 90's

message: There is no such thing as a Gibson "SG" bass, it is called an EB-2. Hasn't he also  used a Gibson Thunderbird?
So what is he?  A guitarist?  A bass player?  A drummer?  This is a really great article that doesn't even tell you what kind of instrument a musician plays.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.28.82.18 (talk) 21:18, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Instruments
Talk:Hans Horrevoets

message: This article needs to be reworded and cleaned up. It makes it sound like he died and then owned a company. Also, notablity could use a little work. Yanksox 12:12, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Aladdin Knowledge Systems

message: The article reads like ad copy, not an encyclopedia article. --GraemeL (talk) 12:21, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed some of the most annoying Corporate Speak. Why is everything a 'solution' nowadays? :)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.178.201.69 (talk) 10:42, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Tagged as advertisement
Talk:Cochrane High School (Cochrane, Alberta)

message: More will be required to avoid deletion. e.g. an infobox Victuallers 11:44, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I am not totally sure whether this page meets WP:NOTE.  But, in lieu of further study of that questions, I have made radical revisions to the text to eliminate totally spurious and unreferenced information.  As always, I certainly welcome feedback. —Matheuler 00:01, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improvements and Emendations 
Talk:Krakoa

message: That's the only reason I can think that this sorry excuse for an article has survived no less than four AfD's, yet still remains untouched. Reminds me of Reddit's take on WP: "It's mostly just fanboys reciting lore without providing any kind of insight. They just cannot take the perspective of a reader who isn't into superhero comics." Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 07:11, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Have you considered to "Fix it yourself instead of just talking about it", now that secondary sources which do provide insight have been pointed out? Daranios (talk) 09:56, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, my preferred course of action would be either redirect or delete, both of which have been tried and failed. Judging by the edit history and the unanimous "keep" votes on all four of the AfD's, it's clear to me that the fanboys on here have clutched this article to their hearts and won't suffer a keystroke to be touched. Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 17:05, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  But I am sure the "fanboys" would not mind if the analysis by secondary sources would be added to make this a more encyclopedic article, which is also the course of action suggested by policy, while deletion is specifically discouraged in such a case as this here. Daranios (talk) 17:58, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think there are any secondary sources, which is why I vote for redirect. Something tells me academics aren't tripping over themselves to comment on a comic book. If you can find those sources, why not take your own advice and work on this yourself? I've done what I think is best, only to have it reverted and as I said, I think the fanboy contingent is just too strong here to allow any objective analysis. Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 18:24, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  Sources are right there listed where I had already linked: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krakoa (2nd nomination). (Fanboys or not, it's unlikely the article would have survived four AfDs without indication of notability.) As for myself, it seemed to me you had more problems with the current state than me, taking the time to point it out, and therefore more incentive to improve it. Also I am busy elsewhere working on problems just like this, like here, and just have interests in other areas (and of course limited time). But if you really want to improve here, but don't want to do it alone, would you like us to both work on it? Like splitting the given secondary sources? Daranios (talk) 19:20, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  There must be a looooooooot of Marvel fanboys here. 

message: Seeing that this page was merged 10 years ago and reverted in all of its in-universe glory w/o any discussion, I have BOLDly remerged it as the same issues exist now which led to the merge in the first place. Anyone who wants to restore the page should be prepared to rewrite the article w/ proper sourcing and real world discussion aimed at the non-fan. Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 02:42, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merged again after 10 years
Talk:For the Love of Money

message: I don't think this song deserves it's own page since both the band's page and The Apprentice's page reference the song to each side. But, I fixed it so it works. Honestly, we don't need this article. Yanksox 12:28, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

message: As Taylor Melhaff has graduated from the University of Wisconsin, I changed the tense.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.185.171.65 (talk) 05:20, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update 

message: I've found two links,  and , that could be used to expand this article. Extraordinary Machine 23:05, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible sources 

message: Given that this was recorded in the summer of 1973, when Pink Floyd's The Dark Side of the Moon had already made an impact on the charts and "Money" had already become an FM radio staple, one has to wonder if lyrically speaking, "For the Love of Money" was written as an answer song? –Wbwn (talk) 23:02, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Answer song? 

message: This list has been unreferenced for nearly TWO years, so I'm gonna go ahead and delete it. Don't re-add it until reliable sources are found.--2601:153:900:43F0:E020:40E1:6B93:43D7 (talk) 04:17, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unreferenced personnel  

message: https://www.mixonline.com/recording/classic-tracks-o-jays-love-money-373580
This link is the updated version of link #1 supplied above by User:Extraordinary Machine
I'm not very experienced with editing - it seems that the original author is supposed to fix "citation needed" issues?
Help!
Tubegeek (talk) 02:19, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested Citation for the desciption of the bass effect
Talk:Carnival Legend

message: Page formerly claimed ship can "do a 10 day cruise in eight days".  
As the meaning is at best unclear it has been deleted.  Kablammo 22:04, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Feel free to comment at Talk:Legend (disambiguation)#Merger proposal.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 02:43, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 
Talk:Southern Football League

message: I've updated the template for the Premier Division but haven't yet had time to do the other two...... ChrisTheDude 12:32, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

message: Can anyone tell me the breakdown of Professional, Semi-Pro, & Amateur teams in the Southern Football League?  Kenallen (talk) 00:34, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There are certainly no professional teams in the league.  As far as I know, all are semi-pro to some degree as opposed to purely amateur -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:04, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Club Info

message: ......is incorrect, as British Gas Business, who sponsored the league immediately prior to Zamaretto, are not mentioned -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 17:27, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sponsorship section just added......... 

message: Hi, Thank you for keeping up with the winners of the League Cup, but couldn't you have a separate page to give highlights of each tournament? (I don't know enough about the tourneys to create the page).
--Ted  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CD9B:E9A0:5560:1889:FD95:84E (talk) 16:39, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello Ted. The best place for the season-by-season detail would be the individual season articles for the league - e.g. 1960–61 Southern Football League. For recent seasons, that information has already been added (see e.g. 2012–13 Southern_Football League and 2014–15 Southern Football League, both of which have the full details). Cheers, Number 57 17:02, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  League Cup section