lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Thomas W. Jones

message: Mr Jones did not lead students in the take-over of Willard Straight Hall. At least two other students planned the take-over (on Cornell's parents' weekend) and it was these two students who led other African-American students into the Straight. Mr Jones was not a prominent student leader at Cornell; he kept very much to himself. He did, however, participate in discussions that led to a resolution of the take-over. 
I attended Cornell University from 1967 - 1971 and was involved in the take-over. I knew the students who planned and executed the take-over. I did not recall Mr Jones attending the "pre-take-over" party held right before students entered the Straight.
170.223.19.5 19:37, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Timothy Noah seems of the impression that Mr. Jones was a bit more involved than this anonymous user posited. Similarly, Minding the Campus refers to him as "AAS leader, Tom Jones". For that matter, so does Cornell, and in an article quoting Mr. Jones. It appears that this article may need some updating. Czrisher (talk) 20:13, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cornell University
Talk:The ABCs of Anarchism

message: On a design-related Blogspot, I’ve discovered an article which shows the entirety of the EP's liner notes (along with some albeit unreliable commentary on the design work related to their creation — which is of course unreliable, being a Blogspot). Obviously, this can't be cited as a source within the body of the article, but would anyone have any particular objection to including a link under the External Links heading? 
Thanks for your time. —Historical-idealist (talk) 21:12, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Liner notes
Talk:Link Belt station

message: Just found another duplicate article (Link Belt, Pennsylvania). Write to me if you know whether or not they should be merged. ----DanTD (talk) 18:58, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplicate article alert 

message: Is Link Belt still a stop on this line, or is it obsolete?--DThomsen8 (talk) 18:24, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Link Belt?
Talk:Thomas Wilbrandt

message: though I really appreciate the wilbrandt's music, and especially the "electric V.", I have the strong impression that the article ist written by a drunk wilbrandt himself, or one of his sexual partners still under hormonal influence. I have hardly ever read so much POV in one article, and I think it in fact degrades the image of this brilliant artist. somebody should rewrite this in a neutral manner. I would do it myself, but I don't dare because I am not as good in english as it might appear.--88.75.154.52 (talk) 19:53, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV
Talk:Thomas Woodcock (officer of arms)

message: Notice was placed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Heraldry and vexillology of a possible edit war occurring on this article. I note that while Mr. Woodcock has been served with numerous FOIA requests, the College of Arms (and therefore its officers) are not subject to such requests as per the language of the Freedom of Information Act 2000. Therefore, while statements regarding such requests may be suitable for inclusion in this article, a statement that the College and its officers are neither subject to nor required to answer any such requests must also be included to maintain NPOV. I have pinged all four of you as you each either added or removed this information recently, and I urge you all to come to a reasonable compromise via this talk page. — Jkudlick • t • c • s 12:36, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  In re: FOIA requests 

message: This article includes Woodcock's own arms and there is a print source given for the blazon of the escutcheon. But it is unclear where the rest of the blazon comes from, and in particular I notice that on the date given for the grant of his arms he would have been 9. Is this correct and how did it come about? The article doesn't mention that he had any armigerous relatives. Beorhtwulf (talk) 16:14, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Woodcock's own arms
Talk:Short 360

message: Can I assume there are no 360's with lavatories on them?  Greg Salter (talk) 00:35, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lavatories? 

message: One Short 360 was bought and converted into a classroom in England
http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2009/mar/24/classroom-aeroplane
83.131.252.59 (talk) 14:27, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Triva? 
Talk:Manayunk station

message: This article is treating Manayunk as though it was somehow a joint PRR-Reading station (somewhat akin to Ivy Ridge). I don't believe that was the case. The Official Guide from 1950 describes them as separate stations, " of a mile apart". Vuchich's 1984 study on the SEPTA Regional Rail system codes them separately as MYP (Ivy Ridge Line) and MYR (Norristown Line). This article should probably be just about the Reading station. I'm thinking the PRR station (which I believe was at Dupont and High?) could be covered at Manayunk West station. Mackensen (talk) 14:57, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  PRR and Reading stations 
Talk:Merion Station, Pennsylvania

message: To the Editor:
Please rename this page "Merion Station." This is the town's proper name. See https://tools.usps.com/go/ZipLookupResultsAction!input.action?resultMode=2&companyName=&address1=&address2=&city=&state=Select&urbanCode=&postalCode=19066&zip=
Eafp668 (talk) 08:01, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of Town
Talk:Thorsten Kaye

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.soapcentral.com/theactors/kaye_thorsten.php. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  💵Money💵emoji💵💸 11:40, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Thorvald Stoltenberg

message: It would be nice to (also) have a photo of a somewhat younger TS.  He was such a good-looking man.  - Hordaland (talk) 17:15, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional photo? 

message: Someone that knows how should fix term_start and term_end  in the infobox, because now the two terms are not rendered correctly. Dubidub (talk) 20:47, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I will check them now to ensure that the dates are rendered correctly. Thank you for pointing that out.--FeralOink (talk) 10:11, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fix dates in infobox
Talk:The Ballad of the Fallen

message: On 2007 March 3 an anonymous user edited this article and re-numbered the tracks (causing presumably unintended problems with the formatting as well).  No reason / explanation was provided for the re-numbering of tracks.  I have tried to repair the formatting but would like to see an explanation for the re-numbering.  The previous track numbering was consistent with the ECM 1248 CD liner notes so I'm not sure why they would need to be re-numbered here.  Is the original LP track listing (grouping) perhaps different than the later CD release?  (ignoring side "A", "B" issues) Pugetbill 13:35, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Track Numbering
Talk:Thrangu Rinpoche

message: Per guidelines for using titles, shouldn't this article be moved to just "Thrangu" or something that omits the "Rinpoche" title? If there are no complaints, I will make the move. - Owlmonkey (talk) 18:28, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Naming
Talk:Thubten Zopa Rinpoche

message: Just to let you guys know...I'm moving "Thubten Zopa Rinpoche" to "Lama Thubten Zopa Rinpoche," just to make it easier and more understandable in order to clarify position.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Prowikipedians (talk • contribs) 11:56, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds like a bad move, as we are supposed to drop the titles of people in Wikipedia. To include it as if it is his name as title of the page is against Wikipedia rules I think.rudy (talk) 12:34, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

text: Rudy is correct. The page should not be moved. Kafziel Complaint Department 15:01, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

text: We're not here to "pay respect" to people. This is an encyclopedia. Kafziel Complaint Department 07:51, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Moving Page

message: Noting the warning of potential immediate deletion of uncited material I have added citations in the three places where they were missing. Please will the supervisor now consider removing the warning?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Freewasp (talk • contribs) 19:58, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  MISSING CITATIONS ADDED
Talk:The BDI Thug

message: Wrong singles listed for BDI thug. Hurricane Starang and Danjer singles are from debut album of O.G.C (Originoo Gunn Clapaz) which belong to Boot Camp Clik along with Buckshot, Heltah Skeltah, Smif-n-Wesson (coca brovaz) 204.191.132.248 (talk) 03:38, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong singles listed
Talk:The Beatles' Hits

message: This article has a low importance rating, but I think the record is interesting.  
All four songs were credited, Paul McCartney and John Lennon.  Not John Lennon and Paul McCartney.
Love Me Do, From Me To You, and Thank You Girl are different versions from the 2009 Past Masters remasters.
Tony Barrow wrote an interesting article on the back predicting the Beatles would be remember in 1973, but She Loves You to Abbey Road were not yet written.
Now that Beatle albums are being remastered onto vinyl I hope they do that with the old made in England mono EPs too. And sell them world wide. Itisnotwritten (talk) 05:42, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Thurl Bailey

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 07:32, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I did some clean-up work, but this page still needs a ton of work. It appears to have been taken wholesale from the Biography page of Bailey's talent agency. --Peter (talk) 19:07, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment
Talk:Moylan–Rose Valley station

message: I've taken out " It was announced on 3/28/2012 that as off the 3/29/2012 the branch would be closed" because the station is not now closed and I haven't heard anything about it.  Is there anything verifiable in this?  Smallbones (talk) 12:39, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not closed
Talk:Smithfield, New South Wales

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://travelmate.com.au/Places/Places.asp?TownName=Smithfield_%5C_NSW (content was added here - see also Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Lionhead99. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:46, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:The Beavis and Butt-Head Experience

message: There is a duplicate page for this album, entitled The Beavis and Butt-head Experience.  Suggest that they be merged. -- Pennyforth 11:40, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. EvilCouch 15:18, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

message: Should the contraversy with Wal*Mart be mentioned? It was not initially carried, along with other albums such as Nirvana's "In Utero", in 1994. I have the Rolling Stone article with every bit of source information needed. Mattbash 01:23, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: By all means... be WP:BOLD, I've never heard of that (maybe because I'm in México.Vicco Lizcano 23:42, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hey

message: I have Two problems with this:
1. When I read "best selling" I think it's in the top three. It's only ranked No 6 in the cited reference, which was printed over 4.5 years ago. It could be even lower now, who knows. This sounds a bit non-NPOV to me.
2. Is this a comedy album or is it "Alternative rock, hard rock, heavy metal, hip-hop, funk rock, grunge" as listed in "Genre" in the box on the left. I know that there are purists out there that say that if you've got a citation then it's gospel. I think that the page should be uniform, it's either a comedy album or music album. I argue that it's not comedy because other than the intros, outros, and Come to Butthead, it's straight up music.
In conclusion, I'd like this sentence removed, but I'll respectfully wait to see if there's a consensus. FiggazWithAttitude (talk) 19:35, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  It is one of the best selling comedy albums... 

message: LowPursuit (talk) 17:57, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternate cut of album?
Talk:Thylias Moss

message: Thalassemia, this is Joseph Toney from Atlanta, GA. I was a good friend of John's when we were in London, if this is John you can contact me at 4706296685. 2600:387:C:2D14:0:0:0:5 (talk) 18:50, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old friend of your Husband ,John
Talk:Thys Lourens

message: Wonder if we are not family i am also from the free state born there grandfather thys lourens was a farmer in the free state just wondering
Regards
M.J Lourens (thys)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.247.103.212 (talk) 21:54, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sukkah (Talmud)

message: In a perfect world, it would make sense for all of the article titles for books of the Mishnah to look the same.  However, I think it is reasonable to say that most people who search for "sukkah" are wanting information on the physical structure, not the book.  Therefore, I think Sukkah should redirect to Sukkot and that this article should take up residence elsewhere.  Sukkot already contains a note at the top linking to to Mishnah-related article.
Some ideas are:
* Sukkah (Mishnah)
* Sukkah (Talmud) (The original home of this article. Currently redirects to Sukkah.)
**Support. It is a book of the Talmud and Mishnah, which is part of the Talmud. Other books of the Talmu exist at similar pages for similar reasons. --Eliyak T·C 00:39, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, and made the move.  I imagine the vast majority of people searching for "Sukkah" are looking for the article about Sukkot, and that article does have a signpost directing others to the book of the Talmud where appropriate.  Kaisershatner 14:21, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Move
Talk:Tiago Splitter

message: In July 3, 2010 Splitter married his girlfriend, Amaia Amescua in Vitoria, Spain. Among the guest were present and former Caja Laboral Baskonian team mates Luis Scola, Pablo Prigioni, Sergi Vidal, and Jordi Grimau.source--Anen87 (talk) 02:47, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Personal
Talk:Newtown station (SEPTA)

message: Not all websites are created equal: be careful about using them as authoritative sources.  http://www.r8newtown.com seems to be an advocacy group, not a disinterested collection of facts and reporting.  Coemgenus 13:36, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Web site sources 
Talk:Samuel Greg

message: There appear to be two versions of this information; the second starts about halfway through and is just a rephrasing of the first part. Is it an earlier version that wasn't removed after a rewrite?
194.39.218.10 (talk) 14:02, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplicated information? 
Talk:Tianna Bartoletta

message: She went by the name Madison through the 2012 Olympics.  Olympic results still show her name as Madison. There is clear animosity between her and her parents since then and clearly she uses Bartlett now.  Another editor has erased most mentions of her former name.  I am now going back to replace Madison in the historical periods of time when her name would be publicly recognizable in sources as Madison.  As a courtesy I am minimizing the mention of any last name through these sections.  I'm posting it in talk because I anticipate controversy, possibly coming from the subject of the article herself. Trackinfo (talk) 23:08, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not the custom in any book, article, publication, etc, etc that I'm familiar with to refer to a woman's maiden name according to the time of events in her life, except as "then Jackson" for instance. So, I removed all but two necessary references to "Jackson." It's not Wikipedia's job to protect or deliberately offend sensibilities. Tapered (talk) 00:48, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last name 
Talk:The Best of Candlebox

message: Personnel needed! Gringo300 (talk) 03:53, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Personnel
Talk:Mary Gormley

message: how can someone can be a "native" of two different cities? Windyjarhead 19:26, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tibor Fischer

message: "he is generally viewed as an apologist for Viktor Orbán, Hungary's avowedly illiberal prime minister." By whom is he viewed as such?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cavszabo (talk • contribs) 18:15, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tibor Fischer question 
Talk:Tibor Machan

message: This article has no third-party sources, and almost no sources at all. Is this guy truly notable, even? Whoever started this page failed to provide an answer to that basic question. Academic38 (talk) 22:02, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Have you tried looking? . This is a collaborative effort.  Skomorokh  22:22, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: A Google Scholar search on 'Tibor Machan -author:Machan' (the last bit to exclude his own articles, which are numerous) produces over a thousand hits, which suggests that he is notable under WP:PROF based on having a significant impact in his chosen field (point 1), and according to the article he holds a named chair (point 5). So he's should be safe on notability. However, it is true that there is an unfortunate lack of sources in the article. What's really ironic is that he has published a memoir, so there should be ample opportunity to produce a sourced bio, even if the sourcing isn't entirely independent. But instead we have the all-too-common, "if it isn't online, it may as well not exist" approach to sourcing. --RL0919 (talk) 22:44, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: I have commenced a tidy-up of the Bibliography section using cite templates. Capitalization and punctuation follow standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, as much as Wikipedia templates allow it. Feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 02:25, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography
Talk:Tibor Weißenborn

message: This article has been tagged as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement.  It will likely be deleted after one week unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Major contributions by contributors who have been verified to have violated copyright in multiple articles may be presumptively deleted in accordance with Wikipedia:Copyright violations. 
Interested contributors are invited to help clarify the copyright status of this material or rewrite the article in original language at the temporary page linked from the article's face. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. --*Kat* (talk) 05:28, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Tierney Gearon

message: I have added some links, citations and information.. I have sorted out some of the problems. Not all.
It has bare urls, and I will do those sooner.Spikequeen (talk) 15:23, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I would like to submit Trunk Archive as an external link. Trunk Archive is the image licensing agency that represents her photography archives. There are links to her personal website and online gallery which show a limited selection of her portfolio. It is valuable and necessary to add Trunk Archive who handles her photos in syndication, and also serves as a more comprehensive gallery to her body of work.
There is a log-in for users that set up an account, but also a general view to the public that requires no log-in at all. This is accessible through the "view archive" link. Thank you.Photoagent (talk) 21:48, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding External Link
Talk:Canadair CT-133 Silver Star

message: :Add  # Support  or  # Oppose  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.
====Survey - Support votes====
====Survey - Oppose votes====
Leave it as it is- this is the most common designation for the aircraft even in the Forces. I would be amazed if anyone referred to the aircraft as anything other than "T-33." As for CT-133 Silver Star, that sounds like the official nomenclature and likely not to be used. If this is any indication, the Alberta Aviation Museum, Canadian War Museum, Canada Aviation Museum and Western Canada Aviation Museum all refer to the type as the "Canadair T-33." Most if not all of these museums have an example on display. Bzuk 23:00, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: Leave it as it is- this is the most common designation for the aircraft even in the Forces. I would be amazed if anyone referred to the aircraft as anything other than "T-33." As for CT-133 Silver Star, that sounds like the official nomenclature and likely not to be used. If this is any indication, the Alberta Aviation Museum, Canadian War Museum, Canada Aviation Museum and Western Canada Aviation Museum all refer to the type as the "Canadair T-33." Most if not all of these museums have an example on display. Bzuk 23:00, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey - Oppose votes

message: The Royal Canadian Legion in Leduc, Alberta has a T-33 on a thirty foot tall pillar on display in front of the building, could and would this be added to the display list?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.251.43.129 (talk) 18:43, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes it can be added but first you need to find a reliable source that mentions it like a newspaper or book. MilborneOne (talk) 19:24, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Display aircraft