lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Stefán Jóhann Stefánsson

message: Where on earth does the word 'Yaldi' in S.J.S.′s name come from? That isn't even a name, rather an exclamation, as far as I have been able to ascertain.
S.J.S., by the way, usually signed his name: "Stefán Jóh. Stefánsson". Steinireyk (talk) 00:58, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: (Updated) I have now removed the word. Steinireyk (talk) 11:21, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strange Word in the Subject's Name
Talk:Stefano Franscini

message: *Should the fact be mentioned that Franscini was one of "only" two Catholics in the first Federal Council of 1848?
*Should the fact be mentioned that Franscini was never elected vice-president and hence never became President of the Swiss Confederation?
*Should either be mentioned in the lead, or worked into the section "Federal Council" instead, perhaps providing some context of the regional distribution of Catholic liberalism and of how presidents (i.e. vice-presidents) were selected prior to the current seniority/rotational principle?
In case anyone is reading, what do you think? Does this border on factoid or is it remarkable enough for an entry? Your thoughts are appreciated. ---Sluzzelin talk 16:52, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some questions 

message: According to the french and german version of this article he was elected to the federal council in the third round, not in the first--195.65.29.162 (talk) 07:49, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Election to federal Council
Talk:Çatalca

message: i've taken the stub message off. This is a short entry but to be honest there's not a lot more to say about Catalca.Istanbuljohnm 04:16, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: On the contrary, in my opinion, there is a great deal to say about the history of Çatalca (region), especially around the time of the Balkan Wars and the foundation of the Turkish Republic.--Михал Орела (talk) 13:48, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: to stub or not to stub?

message: The following coordinate fixes are needed for
The coordinates for Çatalca (Istanbul province, Turkey) point to Büyükçekmece (a little to the souht)
—85.250.186.158 (talk) 09:36, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: . Thanks for pointing out the error. Deor (talk) 10:39, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error
Talk:Sténio Vincent

message: I made the follow changes in my revision just to clarify that accuracy of the article:
"Upon assuming power, however, he adopted a dictatorial stance, culminating in a major conflict with Haiti's Senate in 1935. He created a new Haitian constitution giving him wide powers." -- this statement is opinionated and there are no citations given to back up the facts.  I've replaced this with a referenced statement of fact.
"His popularity waned further when in 1937 he failed to respond to the massacre of 15,000 Haitian guest workers in the Dominican Republic, ordered by that country's president, Rafael Trujillo."  --- The statement that his "popularity waned" and the exact number of "15,000" is an opinion not based on any referenced sources.  Replaced this with a referenced statement of facts.  
Joel (talk) 20:12, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Stephanus Schoeman

message: Schoeman could not have fought in the Anglo-Boer War of 1899 - 1902 as he died in 1890 (see :af:Stephanus Schoeman). Perhaps he was involved in the First Boer War which took place between 16 December 1880 and 23 March 1881. Laurens-af 15:00, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anglo-Boer War of 1899 - 1902 

message: I can find no references anywhere about Ditmarschen? --Renier Maritz 19:01, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ditmarschen
Talk:Stephanus Van Cortlandt

message: If his name was Stephanus van Cortlandt, why is the current title of this article "Stephanus Van Cortlandt" (with a capital "V")?? 98.123.38.211 (talk) 23:32, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fix title of article 

message: lena Dunham not Michael Douglas 2601:1C0:407F:92E0:902B:4E8B:B429:468E (talk) 18:04, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  error
Talk:Upper Sioux Agency

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) – MaterialWorks 19:05, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Upper Sioux Agency State Park →  – Name of historic site in infobox. State park is being closed. Fettlemap (talk) 04:06, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 12 May 2023
Talk:Stephen Crane (Continental Congress)

message: No prominent source can be found to substantiate the claim that Crane was a Founding Father. Unless multiple sources can be produced to support this, the label will be removed. Allreet (talk) 06:22, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The signers of the other three founding documents are accepted per sources and various talk page discussions as Founding Fathers, and since there is no dispute that the Continental Association is a founding document, site consistency applies. Besides the defining 2017 Werther article "Analyzing the Founders: A Closer Look at the Signers of Four Founding Documents" in the Journal of the American Revolution here are two other sources which, for consistency and per WP:COMMONSENSE, acknowledge that the Founders include the signers of the fourth: The Founder of the Day article "Signers of the Continental Association" clearly states "Below is a list of the Founders who signed the Continental Association" [emphasis mine], followed by the names of the 53 signers (Founder of the Day also names the Association as one of the four founding documents). The worldhistory.edu "Top 10 Founding Fathers of the United States of America" - section "List of Founding Fathers of the United States" asserts "Also, two broader groups of Founding Fathers capture the signers of Articles of Confederation (the initial version of the American Constitution which was adopted in 1777 and ratified in 1781) and the signers of the Continental Association (created on October 20, 1774)" [emphasis mine]. Please add these sources to the pages of the other Association signers you are intent of removing from Founding Father status, thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 03:42, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dispute unsourced Founding Father title
Talk:Brian Cashman

message: I'm surprised that there hasn't been more written in the press about the irony in having a Yankees GM named Cashman.  It's like a librarian named Bookman or an ice cream man named Cone. 129.199.159.36 (talk) 18:28, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I know! The irony is unbelievable. Ericster08 (talk) 12:47, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Hey, look up irony, because you don't know what it means!  Hilarious!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Theycallmebruce (talk • contribs) 06:30, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow! That'd be fascinating if anyone had asked you, "Bruce", which no one did. So go pound sand. Ericster08 (talk) 13:41, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Cash''man 

message: The intro says he was born in Rockville Centre and the second paragraph says he was born in Washingtonville. Which is right?InspectorSands (talk) 04:43, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthplace
Talk:Steve Godsey

message: Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia.  It may be considered vandalism.  If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. disruptive editing by Tdl1060
4.88.58.217 23:27, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: My edits are not vandalisim, your additions are not within the scope of a biography that is supposed to be about Steve Godsey not the history of these phamacutical companies.--Tdl1060 19:24, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article carried over a dozen references to unrelated news articles and another dozen links to dead web sources. None of the still active links directly mentioned the subject.  After removal of the blatant COI references, and relinking the 2 active ones, this article still needs accurate and pertinent sources. IF the Steve Godsey was related to the removed sources that should be mentioned IN the article. Otherwise it was just filler. EraserGirl (talk) 16:02, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: unrelated referencing

message: I have tagged :File:Steve_Godsey.jpg, which is in use in this article for deletion because it does not have a copyright tag. If a copyright tag is not added within seven days the image will be deleted. --Chris 00:43, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Steve_Godsey.jpg]] may be deleted
Talk:New Democratic Party candidates in the 2004 Canadian federal election

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:New Democratic Party of Canada candidates, 2011 Canadian federal election which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 02:31, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Frederick III of Denmark

message: Please join the discussion here Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • &site=  count) 14:58, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Frederik or Frederick

message: The article is written in such a way the reader gets the impression Frederick returned the favour (of the Dutch sinking the Swedish Navy), when it seems more likely he was about to betray his alliance for getting half the loot the English would take. And the only reason this did not happen was a coincidence. I propose the section is rewritten. CapnZapp (talk) 17:26, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  1665 "returning the favour" or not? 
Talk:Arkansas–LSU football rivalry

message: The 2008 game summary is eerily similar to this article. For example, compare the first sentence (same words in bold):
Casey Dick threw a 24-yard touchdown pass to London Crawford on fourth-and-1 with 22 seconds remaining to give Arkansas a 31-30 victory over LSU on Friday night.
In 2008, Arkansas quarterback Casey Dick threw a 24-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver London Crawford on fourth-and-1 with 22 seconds remaining in the game to give the Razorbacks a 31-30 victory over the Tigers at War Memorial Stadium in Little Rock.
I know that games are often summed up in this way, but I think it is too similar. You also have this line, which is identical to a line in the article.
With the help of several LSU penalties, Arkansas slowly chipped away before converting twice on fourth down on the winning drive.
Great game, great win. Brandonrush   Woo pig sooie 18:46, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The first sentence definitely seemed ok, but I changed it a little bit just for the heck of it. I rewrote the entire second sentence you mentioned to say the same thing in a different way. Should be fine now, I would think. Cardsplayer4life (talk) 00:00, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagiarism? 
Talk:Masters School

message: I added a NPOV tag because this article seems like it's been lifted from a school brochure or something. I don't know anything about the school, but I can tell it isn't written objectively. Smedley Hirkum 04:39, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Beware! The article was plagued by weasel words that decrease the specificity of detail. Edits painting a vague picture, and the ones done before my edits (see history), may mislead readers who are unfamiliar with the school. Any chance of misinterpreting the descriptions in the article, due to the way it is written, should NOT be tolerated on Wikipedia. Since Wikipedia is not a place for articles of disputed neutrality, any reader should know that this SUBJECTIVELY written article should be rewritten. Till then, the admin tags should remain in place for the potential misinformation and advertising of this school's extrinsic and sensational attributes.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Luige (talk • contribs) 06:18, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attention Readers 

message: The opening paragraph lists a group of alumni; they should be moved to the "Notable students" section which incorporates those who attended as well as those who graduated.  I won't do this myself as some of those in the intro paragraph don't have mention of The Masters School in their wiki article, let alone a citation. Those who don't have a wiki article don't even have a red link, so I'm not sure about keeping them. --Rosiestep (talk) 16:18, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable students/alumni 

message: I added a dispute against the POV of this article because the information presented is uncited and the site seems to be maintained by those who have interest in the school. This fails to be journalistic, and since the information is from a "self-published source", it may be inappropriate.  Furthermore, there are repeated comments on the talk page about the lack of neutrality, yet the tag keeps getting removed.  This article may need to be locked to prevent removal of this POV warning by school administration.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jlederluis (talk • contribs) 04:00, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Which parts exactly do you find objectionable? I'm not saying there are or aren't things that are POV-ish, but I'm curious as to what you think are. Esrever (klaT) 05:36, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV Dispute 

message: While I'm in no position to comment on the remainder of the article, I deleted a paragraph about a recent controversy for asking an admitted Lesbian student to leave.  This incident
involves a totally different school near Hartford, Conn.  Whoever popped that paragraph into
the present article (when it is obvious that the locations and coats of arms are totally distinct) committed the worst solecism that I have ever seen on Wikipedia. Paul Emmons (talk) 00:57, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: (moved from Talk:The Masters School by — Smjg (talk) 13:14, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Tower (school newspaper)]]
Talk:Stuart B. McKinney

message: This article should be merged with Stewart McKinney. The correct spelling is "Stewart," (see official GPO listing in 100th Congress so this page should redirect there. --Sprkee 00:30, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Clearly the same person. Should be merged.--SidP 18:17, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: merge
Talk:William Sio

message: The infobox says "Nationality: Samoan". Surely he must be an NZ citizen to be an MP? Intelligent Mr Toad (talk) 12:49, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: You can read up on it here: New Zealand nationality law#Transition to national citizenship. Schwede66 13:52, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Nationality
Talk:Sükhbaataryn Yanjmaa

message: She died in 1923? So, she was President twenty years after her death? What? Cprhodesact 08:42, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They fixed the page right now but I looked up the date of death and said may 2 1962 there no problems her husband died in 1923 100 correct 2603:6011:B701:AE27:386B:96F8:B15C:B6A5 (talk) 19:12, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page makes no sense at all
Talk:Vermont Route 16

message: *Major Collector 0286
**US 5 (Barton) to VT 5A (Westmore): 7.060
*US 5 overlap: 0.290
*VT 16 state road
**VT 15 (Hardwick) to US 5 (Barton): 20.540  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Polaron (talk • contribs) 15:12, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Sultan bin Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahyan

message: His wife Shamsa bint Mohammed bin Khalifa Al Nahyan for sure NOT the daughter of Mohammed bin Khalifa bin Zayed Al Nahyan, son of Khalifa bin Zayed Al Nahyan the current president. His grand-niece seems not old enough. Instead, it may be the grand daughter of Khalifa bin Shakhbut Al Nahayan, his first cousin twice removed. (although no record than Khalifa I have the third son other than Zayed I and Dhiyab)
Or the grand-daughter of Khalifa bin Zayed bin Khalifa Al Nahyan, great-grand daughter of Zayed bin Khalifa Al Nahyan, his second cousin. 
Matthew_hk tc 21:16, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: More interestingly his wife may related to Hassa bint Mohammed bin Khalifa Al Nahyan, his father first wife, while Sultan is from the second wife. Matthew_hk tc 18:15, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Shamsa is his mother. 62.64.152.154 (talk) 00:23, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Wife

message: Here is the facebook account of his son, may be fake http://www.facebook.com/pages/Sheikh-Hazza-bin-Sultan-bin-Zayed-Al-Nahyan/61053168355 Matthew_hk tc 18:19, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Sons

message: He was listed in the alumni in the wikiepdia but now removed. Please provide more source. Matthew_hk tc 21:42, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Royal Military Academy Sandhurst]]
Talk:Suresh Prabhu

message: Atal Bihari Vajpayee was the PM when Suresh Prabhu was the Minister of Power, kindly rectify the error.  Thedesisuperman (talk) 22:16, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  correction in Suresh Prabhu's page 

message: There is no mention of his work as railway minister. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 06:26, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: No word about current works?

message: I need a bit of help understanding how to go about this and what to do next. Please see the last few edits on this page - Suresh Prabhu: Revision history. I have tried reverting edits of this user User talk:Tensazangetsu4  two times. I have also left two messages on his talk page. The user has again undone my revert despite me requesting them to take it to the talk page. (The content that is being added is way too much in one go, apart from needing extensive editing and sourcing.) DiplomatTesterMan (talk) 06:57, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I've left them a warning, let's see if it has any effect. Vanamonde (talk) 17:17, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:   The user in question has done it again. DiplomatTesterMan (talk) 13:09, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I've sent it to AIV: I this is essentially an SPA editing about a topic I have worked on, so I should not be blocking without good reason. Vanamonde (talk) 16:05, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Ok. Thanks DiplomatTesterMan (talk) 16:33, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Related to an edit war on [[Suresh Prabhu]] 

message: reads like a super fan just inserted his resume here 2001:8F8:1623:66CB:D990:D665:10C7:56FE (talk) 04:48, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  peacock article
Talk:Estes Express Lines

message: Currently, this article reads just like a promotion from the company. I am aware that this company is notable enough to deserve its own article, but at the same time, the article should not be an advertisement. –-  kungming·2 | (Talk·Contact) 04:49, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

message: Hello - I am an employee of Estes, and writing on its behalf to request an update of the information listed in the introduction, under Operations, and in the company profile section at the right of the page. As of today (October 2022), Estes has over 21,000 employees, more than 8,500 tractors and 34,000 trailers, and a network of over 270 terminals. Estes serves all 50 states as well as Canada, Mexico, and the Caribbean. This information is posted on the About page (under Company Facts) on the Estes website: https://www.estes-express.com/about/ Also, the Level2 Logistics division referenced in the company profile no longer exists. Any effort to update the information would be appreciated. Thank you. RBBend (talk) 19:50, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outdated company information
Talk:Susana Mendoza

message: As noted by User:Marquardtika in February 2019, a close contact of the subject (probably a paid campaign writer, judging from the ID) made extensive edits during the 2019 Chicago mayoral elections in which the subject was a top candidate. This included the removal of extensive content legitimately added per Wiki guidelines. It triggered a COI notice. If this continues, I will have to bring it to the attention of higher-level editors. --Zelchenko (talk) 22:42, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict of interest
File talk:Flaccid and erect human penis.jpg

message: This image is NSFW meaning that this image is only to be viewed by persons 18 or over 122.104.181.64 (talk) 08:09, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia is not censored. Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 09:39, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mark this file as NSFW
File talk:Closeup of female breast.jpg

message: Maybe as a straight man I'm biased, but this is a really nice picture! FP Candidate, maybe?
--71.7.143.211 (talk) 04:23, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cool Picture 

message: Note the scar. James Callahan 16:28, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That "scar" is from a bra. 86.120.236.174 02:42, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

text: Could be. 142.167.168.76 (talk) 01:29, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

text: Epic fail: That's just a temporary line line from clothing pressing on the skin (lasts a few minutes). — Lyle Swann (talk) 02:54, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  They're fake 

message: Photo seems more artistic than worthy of an encyclopedia. --God Save the South (talk) 09:29, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That would depend on the article the image is used in.  In the right context it is a fine image. Asher196 (talk) 03:05, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

text: It doesn't look like it is being used to illustrate internal anatomy. I don't think that is the only encyclopedic details on breasts that Wikipedia needs to illustrate. All you really need is a clear image of one breast to know what they both look like, so the second one being blurry doesn't seem too much of a loss (or indeed it may be an improvement). --ZayZayEM (talk) 05:04, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

text: I also feel like this doesn't accurately illustrate a woman's breast. It seems artistic but otherwise serves little purpose as the main image of this article. 66.25.7.206 (talk) 06:49, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Encyclopedic?
Talk:James Few

message: ----
Copyright (c)  2005. Steve J. Rankin
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2
or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation;
with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts.
A copy of the license is included in the section entitled "GNU
Free Documentation License".
----
Above removed from article on 9/25/06 -THB 04:55, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article title says "Few" but the article says "Pugh". What gives? Schmiteye 04:22, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pugh vs Few 

message: The article does not say why he was executed, which is a rather large omission.Bill (talk) 00:11, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Execution
Talk:Future Fantastic

message: Future Fantastic wasn't quite about aliens and UFOs. It did feature a bit of the paranormal, but it wasn't called Future Fantastic for nothing. Don't forget it also examined the relationship between science fiction and technology, the histories of future technologies, and the theoretical and practical applications of developing technologies. (Please forgive the overuse of the word technology). Dessydes 05:01, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not Quite 

message: The Title Music was by HAL but was not Extremis - Gillian liked the music so much while making the show whe decided to collaberate on a song after the show was complete .... lɘɘяɘM яɘɫƨɐƮ  19:24, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title Music 

message: The references added don't seem to mostly be about this show, which is improper synthesis. Fences&Windows 21:37, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference issues