lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:East Columbus (Ohio)

message: Having lived in the Columbus area all of my life (even being born in "East Columbus"), I don't recall this part of Columbus normally being referred to as anything but the "east side", as it is just part of Columbus. This is not the name of any official neighborbood, and does not justify an article or even a stub of its own. The article does not even really mention anything about it except that it in the eastern part of Columbus. Also, Bexley, Whitehall, Brice, Reynoldsburg, and Gahanna are not part of Columbus, but independent municipalities. Except for a distinction between the Near East Side and the "regular" East Side, the article is without value. It should be deleted, as there really is not even anything to salvage to the Columbus article.
Mal7798 16:12, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It would probably be best to merge the small amount of information here into the Neighborhoods in Columbus, Ohio article. It is true that most places don't have enough information worth mentioning to have their own article, so that's why I created the Neighborhoods article so each could be mentioned with perhaps one or two sentences.--Analogue Kid 16:39, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Entorhinal cortex

message: how do you pronounce entorhinal cortex
:As an American, I pronounce it in conversation like: ent-ur-RYE-null. In IPA I would say something like /ˌɛntəɹ'ɑɪnəl/ -- not sure whether to include the r in the second or third syllable. digfarenough (talk) 23:08, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciation

message: I am pretty sure that the EC is not located at the caudal end of temporal lobe but rostral in rodents, too. It closley associated w/ olfactory sense and memory. thats all rostral of fossa interpeduncularis. please correct if I am false.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.15.122.83 (talk) 21:30, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No, I'm pretty sure it is correct to say that EC is located at the caudal end of the temporal lobe in rats. I asked a labmate who slices such brains often and she agreed. It is certainly involved in olfaction and memory (it actually sits high atop the cortical hierarchy and is rather involved in all sensory modalities, I think). Do you have a reference to support the claim that it is rostral of the interpeduncular fossa in rats? I checked Paxinos and Watson, 4th edition. This verified that the IPF is located around -4.5mm bregma in rats, whereas entorhinal cortex is found a few mm further caudal (in fact, EC in rats runs right up the back of the brain, just ventral to some visual areas). digfarenough (talk) 23:08, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  anatomy
Talk:49er (dinghy)

message: What are wings and tubes? Unfree (talk) 09:25, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Terms

message: "Square top mainsail" also deserves elucidation.  Is this a square sail carried above the main sail? Unfree (talk) 09:31, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Square top mainsail

message: Why ist the lenght of the hull in the text 4.99m and the lenght overall in the data box 4.876m? 46.114.33.229 (talk) 12:47, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Length
Talk:Shithead

message: Shithead -- a racial slur for brown people because of their skin color.
Really?  This is news to me.  And it's not on Wikipedias list of ethnic slurs.  I wonder if, in fact, it was added by someone with racist intent -- that is, to perpetuate a new (and especially loathsome) term.
--63.25.230.188 (talk) 14:43, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  A racial slur?!? 

message: to mention that it's actually a relatively common first name in other parts of the world, pronounced sh'theed or shi-tee-ad, but often spelled just as in this entry. The name is actually increasing in frequency in USA. Drsruli (talk) 18:37, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A really helpful subsection would be
Talk:Fokke & Sukke

message: I am a native speaker of Dutch and although the translation was technically correct. The whole feeling of the original Dutch text was lost in the translation. I tried to reassemble it. Niarch (talk) 01:34, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edited the text on the image. 

message: Can the comment about their genitals supposedly being their tails be removed, please, because it is abject nonsense. [Salkafar, 1-2-11]  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.168.81.43 (talk) 22:08, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: "tails"
Talk:Rings of Steel

message: #It's not a studio album, it's an album of remixes
#Track names could/should represent it... For example first track is "Bloodsuckers (Die Arzte remix)" and 13th "Bloodsuckers (Die Krupps with Biohazard)"
--Duke B. Garland 16:54, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Micromeritics

message: --Proepro (talk) 19:22, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

message: Most of the "micromeritics" hits I get are for one company.Nick Connolly 20:08, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: http://www.ssci-inc.com/AnalyticalServices/ServicesandTechniques/Micrometrics/tabid/70/Default.aspx
"The broad field of micromeritics is very important to the characterization of solid-state materials. Micromeritics is a collective term for the various techniques, methods, and fields of study used to characterize the surface of a solid. " - that is a different definition, although the scale is the same. i.e. micromeritics is the the study of things at the micrometer scale including the study of the surface of larger objects. Note the title of the page is 'micrometrics'.Nick Connolly 20:14, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Micromeritics -micrometrics? Synonyms? Differences? 

message: i have added more details on the subject, however experts please comment on its accuracy George moorey (talk) 09:24, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  added more details
Talk:Sauyr Zhotasy

message: This tourism info site says that the high point of the Saur Range is "Mt. Muztau (Icy Mountain)" at 3,819 m. Is this just an alternate name for Sauyr Zhotasy? (It's certainly a very generic name.) Or are they distinct peaks? Any further info would be appreciated. -- Spireguy 17:33, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternate name? 
Talk:Wendish Crusade

message: quote section 3: Albert of Pomerania explained, "If they had come to strengthen the Christian faith ... they should have done so by preaching, not by arms".
Who is he? Bishop Adalbert of Pomerania, mentioned in section 2? --P64 (talk) 23:17, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adalbert, Albert of Pomerania
Talk:National Museum of Racing and Hall of Fame

message: Does anybody care if I add the pictures into the tables, like at List of World Grand Champion Tennessee Walking Horses? It would make the page neater, and make it easier to see which pics we have abd which we don't.  White Arabian Filly Neigh 23:41, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I thought about doing that very thing when I was adding the years. I'm afraid there'll be a lot missing though. Jlvsclrk (talk) 02:53, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Even if there are a lot missing, maybe it'll inspire more uploads. I'll get to it, then, although it might take a while. White Arabian Filly Neigh 00:03, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'll work on it too. Hope I don't get in your way! (LMK to stop if I am) Jlvsclrk (talk) 00:56, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I think we've got them all, but I'm not sure why the table is off. My phone battery is dead, so I'll try to fix it tomorrow.  White Arabian Filly Neigh 01:02, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pics in table 

message: Examples are Russell Baze in 1999 and Bob Baffert in 2009.
 Jockey section 
"To be eligible for the Hall of Fame, a jockey must be licensed for 20 years or have been retired for at least five years."
 Trainer section 
"To be eligible for the Hall of Fame, a trainer must be licensed for 20 years or have been retired for at least five years."
Were those rules made in 2010 because the only changes mentioned in 2010 was voting multiple times is the same category being allowed? Mobile mundo (talk) 00:53, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jockeys and trainers active when inducted in the hall of fame 
Talk:Creighton Miller

message: McBride signed contract with Miller before he signed Paul Brown. 2602:306:3412:5C20:480C:855C:5142:B5EC (talk) 18:01, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mickey McBride
Talk:Shoe insert

message: Orthotics#Foot orthotics links to Shoe insert. Isn't Orthopaedic footwear a better fit. ouch. Merge pages & go with 2nd title? Romanfall (talk) 19:05, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Orthotic insoles are needed when there are, for example, small flatfoot - for correction. User:seagate85 (talk) 23:34, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge ? 

message: Given that this subject is brought up in one of the lead paragraphs, I'd expect it to be further expounded upon in the body of the article, perhaps in a "Criticism" section common to many debated medical topics. A single paragraph that barely gives any detail about which claims by orthotists are subject to critique from researchers, as well as what those researchers actually say (i.e.: quotes, findings, etc.) about those claims, is insufficient to convey to readers the scope of the controversy surrounding orthotic insoles and its nature. Crossark (talk) 01:16, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  More detailed discussion of criticism, controversy, and claims of pseudoscience needed
Talk:Sadie Ama

message: seems there is someone out there who is a massive fan (ip/user 72.85.183.20) and repeated the info that was already there, and also never deleted the original info (bit silly!) and deleted the only reference. it was also completely biased, and we all know that is not what wikipedia is about. if you want to be biased, start your own website... 77.97.18.22 (talk) 22:00, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  is this even worthy of a page?
Template talk:Northstar Corridor

message: I created this as the preliminary map for the Northstar Corridor. Obviously, it is a future project at this time and will be subject to change. Group29 17:27, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

message: At this point a decade later , the planned stops should be struck, and perhaps added to a separate diagram. There is no movement in sight Group29 (talk) 23:54, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Planned
Talk:2R hypothesis

message: I'm noticing a number of things in this article that could use improvement.
The name "2R hypothesis" is becoming obsolete. It is now more widely referred to as "two rounds of whole-genome duplication" or "2R-WGD" for short. It is also referred to as an event more often than a hypothesis. The material in the lede regarding the origin of the term would be more appropriate in a separate etymology section, since it detracts from the substance, only the term is no longer sufficiently notable to warrant an etymology section. Maybe it should just be deleted as cruft.
In the lede it says, "Variations in the number and timings of genome duplications typically still are referred to as examples of the 2R hypothesis." I couldn't find this in the antiquated source, but it is patently absurd. Whole genome duplications are a basic fact of evolutionary biology. 2R has no variation in number: it's exactly 2. A third event in vertebrates, known as 3R, occurred in stem-teleosts. That one is often discussed as an extension of 2R, but that's a separate subject. As for the timing, everyone agrees that hagfish and lampreys inherited ohnologs from 2R and that lancelets and tunicates did not. Thus, it was somewhere around the first vertebrate. Obviously you can't put a date on this in calendar years, but that's a separate issue.
Next, there is a consensus that whole-genome duplications are generally followed by periods of rapid gene loss. The genes that remain typically belong to vast gene-complexes scattered across the genome, usually no more than a handful. For example, only about 20-35% of the genes in the human genome are 2R ohnologs, but they all belong to such vast complexes.
Next, 2R ohnologs in the human genome are prone to dominant deleterious mutations and frequently implicated in cancer and genetic diseases. There is a large body of research on this.
The body of the article is currently divided into two sections, "Ohno's argument" and "Later evidence." These should be lumped into one section entitled "History." Once we have more material to round out the article, the History section should be greatly reduced. Zyxwv99 (talk) 00:15, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestions for improvement
Talk:Leopardstown

message: Anyone want to contribute any more to this page? I would like to know the origin of it's name, at least. . .  —Preceding unsigned comment added by CarmenAutre (talk • contribs) 01:51, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Any More??? 
Talk:1st Corps (Army of the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina)

message: Why does info from this article looks awfully familiar to me. :-p 
http://www.vojska.net/eng/armed-forces/bosnia-and-herzegovina/army/corps/1/
http://www.vojska.net/eng/armed-forces/bosnia-and-herzegovina/army/organization/1994/
http://www.vojska.net/eng/armed-forces/bosnia-and-herzegovina/army/organization/1995/
http://www.vojska.net/eng/armed-forces/bosnia-and-herzegovina/army/organization/1997/ --Ivan Bajlo 17:41, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure if the information you linked to is even copyrightable; it's just a table of organization. IANAL but ideas themselves are not copyrightable, only their presentation. I'm adding a tag for review though. Eleland 18:18, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  It sounds silly if my own work cannot be copyrighted but Wikipedia still demands that all informations have reliable source listed (and I got two admins saying that my website falls in this category) or it is deleted and to make matters even worse most of my info is original research made of gathering pieces of information and putting them together like a jigsaw puzzle which from links above is clearly far from completed. ;-) --Ivan Bajlo 11:57, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

text: Oh, if it's your own work, I can see how that would be problematic. Don't hesitate to replace the page text with  if you'd rather not wait for review. Or better yet release your content under GFDL so we can use it with proper attribution :) Eleland 17:26, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sport in Leeds

message: Leeds City Vixens L.F.C. should get a mention some where on this page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roosterrulez (talk • contribs) 17:50, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

message: :Anybody stopping you from mentioning it?GordyB 19:58, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Solger

message: Does anyone have a source for the statement that Paul died in Thailand in 2006? The statement was added to the 10 Minute Warning page but later corrected by their original singer to say Paul is still alive. Since there is no source given on this page I'm going to remove the claim that Paul died unless someone can provide proof of some sort. Danikat 18:08, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Hop, the Bellhop

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Not moved   (t · c) buidhe 18:01, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Hop, the Bellhop →  – Proper title —NTD (talk) 15:07, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks BP. It's not uncommon for films of this era to have several different titles. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 09:20, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: My tentative conclusion is that Hop, the Bellhop is a different film, featuring Billy Armstrong rather than Bobby Ray, and the title of this film on IMDb is incorrect and I just haven't found a copy of Hop, the Bellhop on YouTube. And Hop to It, Bellhop is just an alternative title for Hop to It!. — BarrelProof (talk) 18:47, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for looking more into this. Is it just a case of two different films, with the same actor, with very similar titles? Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 20:23, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I think so. Except for starring Hardy and having simlar titles, the two films have different actors, directors, producers, and character names. — BarrelProof (talk) 21:31, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 28 February 2021
Talk:Estonian Ruhnu

message: So what happened to the population in the last 63 years that reduced it ten-fold? Trollaxor 02:54, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's my understanding, that when the Soviet Army began occupying Estonian lands in 1944, most of the islanders (which was still comprised of a majority of ethnic Swedes) fled the Russian advance to the Swedish mainland and either took their livestock with them slaughtered them. Once back in Sweden, the breed wasn't kept distinct and were bred into other sheep breeds. At the time, the island had several hundred people living there. However, a few sheep were left behind and the gene pool grew very small. Also, the island was struck by a severe storm in 1970 and most residents were evacuated to either the Estonian mainland or other Estonian islands. Now the island's small population of 60+ residents (nearly 100% ethnic Estonians) have begun to preserve the breed. ExRat 06:27, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thank you for that recollection. It looks like it would do well to flesh out our entry here, though it needs backing up before we can do so. Do you have sources? Or was this passed to you orally during school or from older relatives? Trollaxor 14:50, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population Decline
Talk:Sanyi, Miaoli

message: On 30 August 2007 Roded86400 changed the wording from "wooden carvings in the mudiao style (zh:木雕), which are also called "Kingdom of Taiwan carvings" (台灣木雕王國)" to "wooden carvings in the mudiao style (zh:木雕), which are also called "Kingdom of Taiwan Mudiao" (台灣木雕王國)."  In Roded86400's version there really is no need for the second name since they are all called mudiao. I left a message on Roded86400's talk page asking for an explanation. Note: Kingdom of Taiwan refers to the Qing kingdom on the island, 1661-1683. --Bejnar 18:31, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Kingdom of Taiwan carvings

message: After making a number of edits, I have removed the clean up tag.  The originator of the tag has been blocked, so I was unable to get his/her opinion as to whether it could come off.  I am still concerned about the word mudiao which Roded86400 indicated (before he was blocked) that it was simply the pronunciation of 木雕. He said that he couldn't find a translation of it.  I am not sure that mudiao is a wood carving style.  I am sure that they are called "Kingdom of Taiwan carvings", but that is clearly later nomenclature since no one was producing them here in Sanyi in that period. --Bejnar 01:29, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup tag
Talk:Negativ(e)land: Live on Tour

message: When you edit this, add an album tempate, the track listing, and the cover for the album. I had to make this in a hurry, but all of the information is true. The album is disregarded by the band because it was made without their consent, causing them to take their SST albums to Seeland for re-release.
A&MFan 18:39, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Facility ID

message: The facility ID number or FIN is a unique positive integer
Positive int or unsigned int? 75.92.135.196 (talk) 10:36, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: FIN 0 has not been assigned.  121a0012 (talk) 00:27, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number
Talk:Rochedale, Queensland

message: This was always a claim of billboards and real estate agencies with a means to drum up interest. It isn't encyclopedic, and it shouldn't be here. 
Rochedale hasn't developed at all since 2008 GFC.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.174.169.54 (talk) 01:10, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Development boom 
Talk:Minzu

message: I noticed that HongQiGong has redirected this article to Zhonghua Minzu. Can we discuss that here, for future reference? Matt 18:52, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I made the redirect because I think readers are most likely looking for what is at Zhonghua Minzu when they are searching for "Minzu".  Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 22:14, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for answering my query. I wonder whether Zhonghua minzu is the most helpful article for the redirection. The meaning of minzu is explained at Ethnic minorities in China. Wouldn't ethnic minorities be the most common context in which English speakers would encounter the word? If I have disentangled the article history correctly, the minzu article has pointed at this information (under various article names) for most of its life. Matt 23:41, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

text: Having waited a while, and had a little support for the argument, I've made the change. Matt's talk 04:45, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Where should this article redirect?
Talk:Kwekwe

message: Kwekwe is not pronounced "Kway kway".  The vowel is closer to the e in "dress".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.249.129.3 (talk) 19:30, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Winchelsea railway station

message: 'Inconvenience' of services, and 'the only realistic way..." both suggest to me that this article does not meet Wikipedia's NPOV standards.  It seems to me that the author might very well have an agenda they are pushing.  I will refrain from editing until we have resolved this dispute.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.67.118.118 (talk) 10:40, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality
Talk:Doleham railway station

message: I have added details of the seven services the station provides, later I will add the calling points. I have also slightly tidied the article. Martin H. Heron (talk) 15:38, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Service details (times or calling points) should be avoided; Wikipedia is not a railway timetable. --Redrose64 (talk) 17:38, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seven services
Talk:Three Oaks railway station

message: Added a line about the Customer Information display/help point but this is currently unreferenced until I visit the station to take a photograph of it. National Rail's 'Stations Made Easy' website doesn't show it although it does exist. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Martin H. Heron (talk • contribs) 22:12, 21 June 2012‎
:Please see my response at Talk:Ham Street railway station#New Ticket Vending Machine. --Redrose64 (talk) 13:53, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Customer Information display/help point
Talk:Acer lobelii

message: Any chance of a piccie?  Toby Douglass 20:50, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:St Leonards Warrior Square railway station

message: I mean, this is Wikipedia, not a RR time table. L3X1 (talk) 13:36, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Many GB stations show usage figures: around 2,500 I think. So this is not a topic for the talk page of a single article; rather, it's a question for Template talk:Infobox GB station or WT:UKRAIL. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 17:26, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  IS station usage necessary?
Talk:Festiniog

message: This page was existing as a redirect to Llan Ffestiniog a small town in the North Wales area.  Note the double F spelling, and there is another town, by name of Blaenau Ffestiniog some 2 miles away from than.
As the redirect only uses 1 F, then this must refer to the Festiniog Railway.
--Keith 19:00, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Lafayette Pavilion Apartments

message: Is this locale actually spelled with a double-L?  The English word is "pavilion". — Randall Bart (talk) 19:01, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've looked for an authoritative answer for this, but can't find a completely watertight case. Google page counts favour one 'l' by a ratio of about three to one; pages like this one and this one are about the best I can find, and also point to one 'l'. I'm going to go ahead and make the changes. TimR (talk) 13:50, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling