Talk:Khojaly massacre/Archive 2

message: Khojaly.net:
* "This is a genocide perpetrated by violent Armenian blood thirstier!"
* "This genocide is appealing us to vengeance! And that must be done until the blood of genocide victims will be subdued. Till the end of that vengeance, peace is not possible!"
Is anyone else disturbed by this? Hakob 18:22, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You actually looked at that site? That calls for its removal as per Wiki policy against racism and promotion of hate and violence.--Eupator 18:28, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Links

message: i think a new headline should be made for the resolutions made by un, eu, cis, and other organisations. Karabakh 09:03, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  resolutions 

message: Almost the entire article is about how to call this slaughter this and that but no mention of the people who's head's been cut off, who has been burned alive, girls raped to death, old folks tortured, etc. The brutality of this slaughter should be added. Baku87 07:59, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slaughter 

message: This is clearly a POV. I am an Azari and I think it is POV, you know a lot the things the government in Baku says are totaly fabricated. In fact a lot of the massacres in the region were by elemts from outside, i.e Russians, Turks, and even Europeans. Keeo this in mind. The wording be used is very anti-Armenian and seems aimed at painting a picture rather than being academic. 69.196.164.190
: You think that if you use a different IP no one will know that you are banned user User:72.57.230.179, evading the block? Grandmaster 21:56, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: As an Azari I think there is a lot of Anti-Armenian POV

message: This article is tagged under the category of "nonwar-armed confrontations," yet the text of the article and basic common sense would indicate that the Khojaly Massacre happened during a time of war. Unless this can be explained in a satisfactory way, I'm removing the tag and replacing it with a war crimes category, which I believe is a more accurate description of the event. Augustgrahl
: Yes, I also think it should be in the war crimes category. Grandmaster 04:31, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Armenian Relocation also occured during the war. ~ —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 88.76.237.169 (talk) 17:26, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Inappropriate Tag?

message: The reason for my revert was that a big chunk of text was removed from the article and replaced with unsourced poorly writen Azeri POV. Vartanm 17:11, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've been reverting this guy's edits for two days now. I've requested that the page be semi-protected, the repeated removal of text and introduction of potentially copyrighted text can be considered as vandalism. -- Augustgrahl 17:19, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: added relevant quotes from de Waal and Goltz's books. Will add more from other Western authors. --AdilBaguirov 08:49, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As promised, adding another quote from Hugh Pope, "Sons of the conquerors: the rise of the Turkic world", New York: The Overlook Press, 2006, ISBN-10 1-58567-804-X, "In February 1992, according to the International Committee of the Red Cross, at least 600 people from Hodjali, mostly Azeri civilians, were killed as Armenian troops forced them to flee late one winter night. The Azeris say many more died. It was Azerbaijan's worst catastrophe in Nagorno Karabagh. Even the lower figure represents one twelth of the Azeri dead in the whole six-year war. Overall, during the war years between 1988 and 1994, one in ten of all Azeris were displaced from their original homes." (p. 52)
"Alef Hajiev, the militia leader, helped Hodjali cling on for a few months with little food, no gas, no electricity and firefights around a contracting perimeter." (p. 59) --AdilBaguirov 04:10, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  de Waal and Goltz quotes 

message: Added Turkophobia category, where this topic also fits in. Atabek 11:25, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Would it be more accurate to say that this was an act of anti-Azeri sentiment? -- Augustgrahl 13:11, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it does fall into anti-Azeri category. However, Azeris are Turkic-speakers, and called as Turks by Armenians. Moreover, the main article Anti-Turkism, mentions that the sentiment is directed not only against Anatolian Turks, but also about other Turkic peoples of Azerbaijan, Central Asia, etc. Atabek 18:19, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Then why not call the category "Anti-Turkism" instead of "Turkophobia"? -- Aivazovsky 00:01, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think they mean essentially the same thing. -- Augustgrahl 00:56, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Category