Talk:Pavillon de Flore

message: I have placed the review on hold for the following reasons:
*The prose was confusing in parts, so I have done some copyediting. Please check that my changes were accurate. Everything looks good. Lazulilasher (talk) 01:36, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Good catch (truly, that required a bit of background work!) Carpeaux's work was meant to evoke the name of the structure. Thus, the name existed before Carpeaux added his bit. His work was indeed commissioned by Nap III, but the Pavillon de Flore already had the name Pavillon de Flore. Ok, fixing...........Lazulilasher (talk) 15:08, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It was completed. Fixing now and will update with a summary here when complete....Lazulilasher (talk) 15:26, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Okey Dokey, so the Grande Galerie (alternatively called the Galerie du bord de l'eau (gallery next to the water) and the Pavillon de Flore were both authorized by Henry IV to link the two palaces (interestingly this was also the largest edifice of its kind at that time). Anyway, it's fixed and ref'd. Lazulilasher (talk) 15:46, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

text:  Ya, they actually aren't aligned. I created a custom Google map here which demonstrates it (it is much more clear if you click on 'Satellite View'). Anyway, no, the other structures (except the Louvre/Tuileries) did not exist. The Palais de Tuileries helped offset the fact that the Louvre and the rest of the Champs-Elysees were on two different axes.  Once Tuileries was burnt down, this became more clear (although I never noticed it until I read about it, the scale of the structures in that area of Paris help to obscure this slight aesthetic aberration).  Regardless, the text did not make this clear. So, I have clarified it. Lazulilasher (talk) 16:01, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

text: Also, I know that it may look like I'm bordering on OR here, so I am working on getting that fact cited. I should be able to find a ref soon. Lazulilasher (talk) 16:31, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Ok, reference added. Lazulilasher (talk) 19:35, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

text: Hi, thanks so much for the review. I am currently working on your requests and will let you know when they are met. Lazulilasher (talk) 03:06, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

text: Comment by Frania W. transfered from Lazulilasher's talk page: "I read the article, saw the changes you made & added a few of my own. Will return to it with more info on historical "personnages" who passed thru it. There is also work to do in the Footnotes, such as following certain rules RE bibliography, going something like : last name of author, first name, title of book, page of reference, publisher, city where published, year. Will add this comment on PdF talk page. Frania W." Frania W. (talk) 03:10, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:   Yep. You were right--all of the footnotes were not in the same format--they've all (I think) been changed now to fit inline with the cite templates. Lazulilasher (talk) 03:45, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

text: Hi Frania, we can actually just type :pp in the pages argument of the  template. I'll do that now and post one here for you as an example. It took me forever to finally figure out how all of the , , and <ref> templates worked, so no worries there :)  Lazulilasher (talk) 18:29, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  ok, the footnotes now clearly mark the page numbers. Anyway, here's an example of the tag for future reference:. Lazulilasher (talk) 18:49, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: GAN review

message: I now feel the article is at Good Article level and passed the review. Well done for the improvements made. Epbr123 (talk) 14:01, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: GA pass

message: Lazulilasher: RE the copyright for the photograph of the "haut relief" by Carpeaux on the façade of PdF, please check the following: http://www.insecula.com/root/conditions.html. It looks like we have to look somewhere else, unless you want to go & take the picture yourself as I, unfortunately, am not in Paris right now to do it. Frania W. (talk) 23:24, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It is quite unfortunate that I, as well, am not in Paris. I was just there a few months ago and at that point, I wasn't even aware that you could actually edit wikipedia. If I'd known I would have taken many photos. Oh well. Lazulilasher (talk) 13:54, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Search for copyright-free photo of Carpeaux' haut-relief on façade of Pavillon de Flore 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Porte des Lions. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 15#Porte des Lions until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  signed, Rosguill talk 18:34, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Porte des Lions" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]