Talk:Henri Bergson

message: What, specifically, was the mathematical problem whose solution was Bergson's first publication?  -- Mike Hardy
----
Why would make Bergson an existentialist??? Marc Girod 15:24, 20 Dec 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article should be cut into sections; in its present form it is kind of hard to read ^^ FiP 15:42, 10 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Sections

message: There is considerable renewed interest in Bergson at present which appears to be missing on the page at present. Would anyone help me review this. Personally, I am especially interested in - but have no expertise on - the critical dispute between Bergson and Einstein on Time Jeffrey Newman 04:42, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Family background: I have edited out the reference to English 'blood' and added the Irish connexion. His mother was, I think, born or brought up in Doncaster but the family had been living in Ireland. The information, I think, is in Philippe Soulez biography. Where, and how, do we put sources? Jeffrey Newman 04:08, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Major Concern re this page

message: Santayana has many aphorisms mentioning M. Bergson the idealist, I can find in google "M. Bergson" many times, but not a whole first name. I suppose he was a contemporary of Santayana. There should be a disambiguation if anyone knows more Nagelfar 02:31, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The notion that Santayana was anything but a virulent critic of Bergson is false.  I have added a well-needed section on Bergson criticism explaining this and some of the history of his reception. 71.198.247.21 01:37, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  M. Bergson? 

message: No mention of this pivotal metaphysical and philosophical idea constitutes, I would suggest, a glaring omission. There is a page on élan vital which is a stub and where Henri Bergson is listed.   meco 19:25, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: To say nothing of Duration, around which both his epistemology and his metaphysic (including élan vital) were built. I'm considering adding a crappy version of a section on the subject myself, just because it's silly for there not to be anything on it in this article. --216.254.15.134 05:49, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Élan vital 

message: "Clermont-Ferrand, capital of the Puy-de-Dôme département, a town whose name is usually more of interest for motorists than for philosophers, being the home of Michelin tyres and the Charade Circuit racing track." 
Suggesting that Bergson moved to C-F because he was a racing enthusiast is very amusing, but hardly fair as he moved there in the early 1880s. Jedermann 10:39, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bergson and motor racing 

message: It is absolutely ridiculous for someone to include Bergson under the category of "Polish Jew", "Polish-French", or "French Roman Catholic".  There is no documentation of Bergson ever converting to Roman Catholicism or Christianity.  To call Bergson a "Polish-French" person is to call Julia Louis Dreyfus a "French-Jewish" person even though her Mother is not Jewish and Julia was born in America, and her "French-Jewish" father is an American citizen who was born in France of an American mother and who left France permanently at age 8.  Bergson was born in Paris.  His parents were French citizens.  It makes no difference if his ancestors were from Poland, England, Ireland, or Israel.  The article is about Bergson NOT the past nationalities of his parents and grandparents.  Bergson cannot simultaneously be a "French Jew", "French Roman Catholic", "Polish-French" person, "English-Irish-French" person, or "Polish-English-Irish-French-Hebrew-Roman Catholic-Jew."  If Bergson is to be classified as anything it would be a French Jew.  He has no claim to Polish, Irish, or English nationality or ethnicity. Pistolpierre 22:13, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bergson was not a Polish Jew, nor was he a French Roman Catholic 

message: There is next to nothing in this article on his philosophy. Plenty on where he might have been influenced, how his work was received, and his lecturing and publishing, but the content of his work is missing. Anyone know what it was? (The articles Élan vital, Matter and Memory and Creative Evolution (book) are pretty stubby. Squiddy | (squirt ink?) 08:21, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have created two articles on Bergson’s ideas, one on his method of intuition and the other on his theory of Duration. The latter suffices as an introduction, but the former could use a lot of work. However, I plan on improving the article and perhaps creating a section which is a basic overview of his philosophy within the main article, because, as you yourself have pointed out, his philosophy has been poorly treated on Wikipedia. Le vin blanc 11:36, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  So, what did he think? 

message: I have added a section which contains a basic overview of Henri Bergson’s philosophy. It mentions his influences, theory of Duration and method of intuition. It needs to be expanded to include his theory of Élan Vital, his idea that perception is memory and this idea’s implications. Le vin blanc 13:22, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have now added a little bit of information on Bergson's Élan Vital, but I believe the section can use being expanded. Le vin blanc 14:00, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I have added a section on Bergson's theory of laughter. If someone can provide references from the primary source, Laughter: An Essay on the Meaning of the Comic, it would greatly improve the section's legitimacy. I believe that the only major ideas to be added now are those from Matter and Memory and The Two Sources of Morality and Religion. Le vin blanc 14:00, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Philosophy Section Added 

message: There is nothing about the relationship Bergson had with Spinoza's philosophy apart from a simple listing in the Influences section of the infobox. Same for Frege.91.153.139.153 (talk) 14:34, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Spinoza and Frege influences?

message: When George Bernard Shaw talked about "Creative Evolution" and "the Life Force" in plays such as BACK TO METHUSALEH, was he quoting Bergson, or was it a coincidence?  If the former, this should be listed as one of Bergson's legacies.   50.180.19.238 (talk) 03:03, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bergson and Shaw? 

message: This page has a very hefty criticism section at the bottom, but little about Bergson's profound legacy. This seems to suggest that Bergson is mostly remembered in a critical light, which is not true at all. Therefore, I would suggest that a section be added to discuss Bergson's legacy and influence on subsequent philosophy. It might also be a good idea to add discussion of Bergson's influence on art and architecture as well.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.24.119.166 (talk) 23:43, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  More on Legacy, less criticism 

message: Following on from that last point, I understand that Bergson influenced the Swedish psychologist Hjalmar Sunden. I have started an article on Sunden  - a little concerned that it could be deemed an orphaned article, I think that if Bergson's influence on Sunden is mentioned here, that may help to reduce that happening. 92.4.113.184 (talk) 20:27, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Legacy: Influence on H.Sunden

message: The stuff on a three-sided bacon plange is obviously bullshit and should be removed. I was intrigued at first and googled it, finding nothing, and there's no mention of it on the wikipedia.fr page. I guess it's a good chuckle, but he didn't publish anything in 1935. i'd remove it but i'm not a wikiuser per se  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.83.101.48 (talk) 20:07, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the heads up. I did my best to fix it. I'm not sure which version of the conversion-to-Catholicism text to go with. — goethean ॐ 20:44, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The bacon stuff is obviously bullshit 

message: Since there has bee no discussion on the talk page of issues related to the NPOV and sources tags, I will tentatively remove them. — goethean ॐ 02:57, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing tags 

message: I have removed the subsentence "[The Roman Catholic Church,] which still believed that finality was reached in philosophy with the work of Thomas Aquinas in the thirteenth century, and consequently had made that mediaeval philosophy her official, orthodox, and dogmatic view […]". Since 2004 somebody (see above) underlined that this is false and out of context. Other than the example of St. Bonaventure, one can cite many other theologians after Thomas that have given original contributions to the Catholic Faith and yet have been made Doctors of the Church (St. Teresa of Avila, St. John of the Cross…).
Zio tom78 (talk) 15:43, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Church's decree of 1914 

message: I added Plotinus as an influence.  See this source:
http://books.google.com/books?id=1PwTZPW1ohQC&pg=PA139&lpg=PA139&dq=Bergson+influenced+by+Plotinus&source=bl&ots=RoTGn2J0Xr&sig=S7czXbG0KCOqRo8v9prDb_Wxoz8&hl=en&ei=yQi1S-DsBoTGlQfG1uBx&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CAYQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=Bergson%20influenced%20by%20Plotinus&f=false
"That the philosophy of Henri Bergson is significantly influenced by the doctrines of Plotinus is indicated by the many years Bergson devoted to teaching Plotinus and the many parallels in their respective philosophies.  This influence has been discussed at some length by Bergson's contemporaries, such as Emile Bréhier and Rose-Marie Rossé-Bastide..."
128.164.62.227 (talk) 21:03, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Influenced by Plotinus 

message: On 2010-06-17 at 1748 hours a Wikipedian removed (without explanation) a valid URL linking to a reference, thus depriving Wikipedia readers of straightforward navigation to a scholarly source. Let's restore the URL. -- Pedant17 (talk) 01:22, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of link to online reference 

message: Does anyone have access to a list of Bergson's major works? It would be nice to see a section that listed these. Right now there is the section that lists his 4 most popular books, but I think there are other books and/or papers that should be on the list. From what I understand Bergson wrote a lot in his time and the short list does not do this justice.
urbinsanity (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 03:35, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comprehensive List of Major Works 

message: "Henri-Louis Bergson (French: [bɛʁksɔn] 18 October 1859 – 4 January 1941) was a major French philosopher, influential especially in the first half of the 20th century. Bergson convinced many thinkers that immediate experience and intuition are more significant than rationalism and science for understanding reality." - I see some clear partiality here. Would it be fitting to Wikipedia standards to say that Bergson "convinced" people of some thesis? Is this a fair description of philosophical research and academic debate? To say that he is influential "especially in the first half of the 20th century" is also derogatory to some degree, does this mean his ideas are not as influential now as they were during the firs half of the 20th century? He is certainly within the most influential of french philosophers from the last 150 years.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.82.224.131 (talk) 18:33, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia standards 

message: A major new book by Jimina Canales appeared in 2015, winning a prize as the Science book of the year, on the continuing and defining debate on April 22 1922 between Einstein and Bergson. It documents how Einstein's success and his scathing attack on Bergson as a 'psychologist' was the beginning of the rapid decline in Bergson's influence but that now it is becoming apparent there were mutual important misunderstandings which still echo today.
I have lost my Wikipedia identity and lack the expertise to edit the main article so add this information here.
Incidentally, the article is, in the whole, readable and highly informative, descending st the end into a POV meaningless jumble of names. 90.198.209.176 (talk) 06:34, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The book by Jimena Canales you cite is probably very interesting, but the information you give seems me not sufficient to add significant information to the article.--Auró (talk) 21:27, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: To much 'hearsay' comes from Canales' book which should be read carefully and  with some attention to details. Historically, the meeting with Einstein is a non-event,  Bergson's book has been more important, but even that does not mean much.  Bergson views clashed with the official French ideology and lost their appeal for various reason, but his opposition to relativistic physics hardly counts among them.195.96.229.126 (talk) 11:49, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Physicist and the Philosopher 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Henri Bergson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090206183341/http://www.college-de-france.fr/default/EN/all/phi_sci/p1184676830986.htm to http://www.college-de-france.fr/default/EN/all/phi_sci/p1184676830986.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100527113913/http://www.egs.edu/library/henri-bergson/biography/ to http://www.egs.edu/library/henri-bergson/biography/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:10, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The article mentions that HB won an award for solving some math problem but it gives no further details. If they are available they would be interesting especially because it might have some bearing on his standing as something more than a "psychologist" in his debate with Einstein.--Jrm2007 (talk) 20:46, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mathematical Problem? 

message: In response to the above discussion
* Henri Bergson was born in France to foreign born parents. Since the French Revolution, kids born in France with at least one parent born in France are automatically French citizens. This is what they call Double droit du sol. Furthermore, after living in France for 5 years, any kid is eligible to be naturalized as a French citizen. This is most likely what happened to HB.
* Henri Bergson is clearly of Jewish descent, but without more extensive research, it is hazardous to qualify him as a Polish Jew (most likely Ashkenazi on his father's side) or English Jew (most likely Sephardi on his mother's side). I therefore suggest that we use the more general of Jewish descent to refer to his ancestry in this article.
In response to this Edit and this Reversion :
* Towards the end of his life, out of solidarity with fellow Jews who were persecuted during World War II, Henri Bergson stood by his origins and willingly registered himself as Israélites with the Vichy administration. But according to the well referenced French Wikipedia article about Bergson, he nevertheless might have grown closer to the Catholic Faith than to his ancestral Jewish Faith. I therefore suggest that we remove the French-Jewish Philosopher attribute in the lead and replace it with French Philosopher, moving the ethnic and religious references to the biography section of the article, as customary in WP. X-ode (talk) 06:06, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nationality, Ethnicity & Religion