lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of Walt Disney World Resort attractions

message: What about the Swiss Family Robinson treehouse?  I haven't been to Disney in a while, but I know it at least used to be there.  It should be included on the list.
24.229.37.170 01:02, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Swiss Family Robinson 

message: Ace Ventura may be my favorite movie, but considering the film, it's hardly WDW-material. Either Disney's aiming for the older age group, or this (and a couple other "attractions") are hoaxes.
:I looked it up and this was supposedly an actual street performer at the Studios - though just recently an anonymous user removed it from the page.  Should it be re-added? --Comthought 14:47, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  False Attractions? 

message: This article is a mess, maybe just the current and past pages should be used. --blm07 07:58, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, maybe it should be seperated out into multiple lists by parks/resorts/etc and old, never built or current attraction --Napnet 16:30, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mess 

message: The article lede says that this article is supposed to be a list of "all past and current attractions, restaurants, and events at Walt Disney World," but it seems that editors have removed all (or almost all) of the past attractions. Should this article only include current attractions, or should the edits that removed the past ones be reverted? If this article should just be current ones, should a new article be created to list past ones? For what it's worth, there are already separate list articles for current vs. past attractions at Disneyland (the California park.) Vbscript2 (talk) 22:09, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Past Attractions Removed?
Talk:Lawful order

message: Needs a sentence or paragraph of introduction defining what makes an order lawful and putting it in context.  Alternately we could define when an order is unlawful. RJFJR (talk) 17:17, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I believe the article should be altered to be more universal and not directed solely at the concept of Lawful Orders in the United States Military. If this is deemed acceptable, I will add information about the concept.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.101.62.41 (talk) 16:31, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  US-centricity 

message: In order to give readers the broadest possible historical perspective, I propose that this article be merged with Superior Orders. In order to keep this discussion all in one place please visit this link to participate in the discussion: Talk:Superior_Orders#Merge_proposal.
- Sincerely - Boyd Reimer (talk) 15:35, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: After over a month of not seeing any discussion on Lawful Orders, I redirected it to Superior Orders.  (Besides, the page "Lawful Order" did not have any citations itself.) Please see this discussion and rationale for the redirect: Talk:Superior_Orders#Merge_proposal - Boyd Reimer (talk) 22:10, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal
Talk:Bifidobacterium animalis

message: Learn how to spell before you write an article.
:Actually, "yoghurt" is the correct spelling in some countries. As you'll notice once you've been here longer, Wikipedia uses both British Commonwealth and American spelling. The rule is that each article should be consistent, and should stick with the form of English used by the original author unless the subject is exclusively related to Britain or the United States. --Srleffler 01:46, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

message: I edited down the "weasle word" tone  and added an inline cite. It still could use some clean up but this helps some. M-BMor 15:59, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: This article is about an organism, a dietary supplement, and a gut microflora. It is not about a product or brand by a multinational corporation. Although this aspect will remain as a controversial aspect of this organism, in the next week or so I will be making a massive overhaul to the structure. Assistance or opinions are welcomed.  --Mercola over Merck 19:47, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Organism vs. Product 

message: The article refers to papers highlighting the benefits of the bacterium, but the article does not describe what any of these benefits are. — Swpbtalk.edits 02:28, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I see a list of references about benefits.  I added an expansion request to it so that hopefully someone will summarize these benefits. Darthveda (talk) 15:10, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Benefits? 

message: I may be mistaken, but I'm 99% sure that DN-173 010 is a strain of B. animalis subsp. lactis, not B. animalis subsp. animalis.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Truthseekingscientist (talk • contribs) 20:15, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taxonomy 

message: Effects of dairy products on heterocyclic aromatic amine-induced rat colon carcinogenesis.
See the reference to "Bifidobacterium animalis DN-173 010 fermented milk"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.108.237.202 (talk) 22:30, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional References you may wish to consider
Talk:The Black Fleet Crisis

message: workin' on it Dark jedi requiem 01:08, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: don't delete

message: If you want to help go to: User:ILovePlankton/sandbox. ILovePlankton 01:54, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Working on the merge
Talk:Coke

message: Disambiguation pages are not based on having people sound out words in any case - this would be the only one I know of on Wikipedia, and the Wikipedia pronunciation of "Koch" is not "Coke" -- pronounced /ˈkoʊk/ is fairly clear in my opinion. Collect (talk) 01:06, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: i respectfully disagree.  The only people i know personally named "Koch" pronounce their name the same as the trademarked nickname for Coca-Cola (and the Koch (surname) page confirms), and what is the purpose of a disambiguation page if not to help people find/distinguish things with similar names that might be mistaken for one another?  If you hear about Mr. or Ms. Koch without seeing the name in writing, surely "Coke" is as reasonable a guess as any?  After all, tons of companies are named after their founders!  --71.121.143.2 (talk) 05:59, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Koch is not a likely spelling of Coke, and vice versa 

message: I believe that the word illict should change to illegal to make it for readers to understand --Lawrencegordon (talk) 13:50, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The vast majority of people who read it are going to understand what illicit means. It's not a very hard word. Illicit is also a word that is often used when talking about drugs specifically.★Trekker (talk) 13:54, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: The changing of illict to illegal
Talk:Big Stone Gap, Virginia

message: Hi, fellow wikipedians.  Please see this talk item for a bit of information about recent edits to the external links section of this article:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Aplomado#External_links_list_on_Big_Stone_Gap.2C_Virginia
I apologize for not holding the above-referenced discussion here on this talk page where it belongs. --Takeel 01:11, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edits to external links 

message: I think this article could use some history, especially regarding the name of the town.
137.54.92.191 15:30, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's the History? 

message: Since when we were a state instead of the Commenwealth???  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.98.249.62 (talk) 04:48, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Walmart 
Talk:Beretta 92G Elite II

message: Is there actually no manual safety? Then what's that on the slide by the hammer? --UNHchabo 01:15, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

message: I'm merging this page with Beretta 92 (which now contains information on options and variants) as it's only a variant of the original and the page contains only duplicated data and doesn't meet the criteria for a seperate page, please see Wikipedia:Merging and moving pages which lists the following guidelines:
* There are two or more pages on related subjects that have a large overlap. Wikipedia is not a dictionary; there does not need to be a separate entry for every concept in the universe. For example, "Flammable" and "Non-flammable" can both be explained in an article on Flammability.
* If a page is very short and cannot or should not be expanded terribly much, it often makes sense to merge it with a page on a broader topic.
* If a short article requires the background material or context from a broader article in order for readers to understand it.
Deon Steyn 10:56, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:The Crossley Heath School

message: I have removed the prod. This school is old and I think deleting it is against the agreed policy on Schools. However, it does need more work. --Bduke 01:18, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, OK. I was prodding it on content (One line isn't enough, even with a stub tag) Sceptre (Talk) 23:44, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Eovia

message: This whole article feels like it was written by the Eovia PR department.  Anyone care to edit out the hype? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.156.166.130 (talk • contribs) 
:I think some of it was copied and pasted from their website. I just haven't had the time to clean it up. It's probably all copyvio, too... So, feel free to be bold and do with it what you wish. --TangentIdea 02:29, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed; it's POV as hell. It also needs some formatting cleanup. I might clean it up soon if I have the chance, but hopefully someone else will help out with it. --AdamAtlas 20:01, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Writing Style 

message: User Bertmg added the offending content. From his contributions, it seems he's most likely from Eovia, rather than just a newbie who misunderstood Wikipedia and pasted some PR into the article. --AdamAtlas 20:10, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bertmg 

message: I DO NOT work for Eovia, although I wish I did. I am just a big fan of their software. When I went to Wikipedia I noticed that Eovia products don't show much nor that it was properly categorized. I was not sure how to get the category right: "Software > Computer graphics", but I figured I could add some meaninfull text to it.  This is my first article in Wikipedia, and with fear of putting my own words for a company and producs that are not mine, I did use some cut and pasting from their website using Modo's wikki site as a model (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modo_%28software%29)
Again, I am sorry.  I'll try to fix some, but I am not sure what type of info I should write instead. Modo seems to be corporate looking too.  Any input is gratelly appreciate it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bertmg (talk • contribs) 22:39, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  I am trully sorry 

message: I am obviously not sure how to add articles to Wikki — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.224.35.36 (talk) 18:15, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  I give up.. delete it if you must 

message: Was Carrara Basics, as opposed to Carrara ever a distinct product from Eovia? Geoff Riley 10:33, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Carrara Basics
Talk:The Chance

message: in addition to the bands listed on the page, I know that Marillion, Renaissance, Annie Haslam, Patrick Lee & The Scaters and others played at The Chance. I know it's true but I can't remember when exactly and can't find cites. The WPDH website may have info, I know they broadcast at least one of the Marillion concerts and I remember their DJ's introducing some of the acts. I'm glad to hear that it's still an active venue. ++Lar: t/c 01:35, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Template talk:Martialart-stub

message: I fixed the link involved to point to martial arts and not martial art, which would redirect to martial arts. The user would get there anyway, but I think it looks bad on us if we don't even have our templates pointing to the right article.
Liastnir 01:35, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fixed Link 

message: I'm not sure if this is the right place to say this, but I find it a little POV to associate a Ying-yang with martial arts. I mean, chinese people weren't obsessed with ying-yangs and korean people didn't even know what they were until the rest of the world did. Assosiating a ying-yang with martial arts is like putting the american flag on a category called "smart people". After all, we have pretty smart people. How long is it until that is not a biased, POV statement? Has anyone realised Taekwondo is more popular than Karate? An image associated with chinese 
popular culture does not belong on a category full of martial arts stubs.Daniel_123 | Talk 14:04, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Why can't we just add a fist or something? That pretty much sums everything up. Sorry WTF TKD.--NoNo 02:34, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Biased against weaponed, open-hand-striking, and non-striking arts? :)  Alai 00:35, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Martial Arts
Talk:List of Ancient Mamodo

message: *The page was in dire need of fixing; a lot of the stuff on this page smells made-up.  Also, I put it in order of appearance instead of the near-arbitrary order it was in before. Danny Lilithborne 05:11, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revamp 

message: This article seems very fans-only - unless you have a very good klnowlwege of what it's about beofre you view it, you understand NOTHING.
For instance - what the heck IS a mamodo? That's what I want to know...
*It's in Zatch Bell!. Danny Lilithborne 02:49, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  For Fans Only 

message: ok im kind of in the dark about what "book burned" means so can i have an explaination of what it is? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Monkey2619 (talk • contribs).
*In Zatch Bell, when a mamodo's book is burned, the mamodo is sent back to the mamodo world. Danny Lilithborne 02:02, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Book Burned 

message: ... has this to do with building an enyclopedia?! There's an article on the Manga Series Zatch Bell!, and IMHO that should be more than enough on that topic. Who ever has watched an episode of "Zatch Bell!" will probably agree that this stuff is of rather low educational value, to be polite. Why don't we have an article on every sentence that every imaginary character from every low quality trash series ever stammered, shouted, etc..? In my opinion, articles like these are spam. Although some people may put considerable work in writing them, who should ever want to read up on this topic? I just can't imagine the use of it.-- 790 23:57, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just what... 

message: *Could it be possible that Jobin is a ancestor of Reycom? Kid Sonic
:A lot of the Millennium Mamodo share spells with the modern ones, so it's possible. JuJube 02:00, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with you:
Kid Mamodo - Maruss
Jobin - Reycom, Laila - Zatch, Erujo - Robnos, Paramakion - Fein, Karura - Sugino
This isn't a complete list yet. Kid Sonic
*I just hope there isn't a little Victoream running around.  Maybe that's the unknown "tenth mamodo"?  Gasp. JuJube 04:19, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: About Jobin

message: How does Victoream reappear in ep. 89 if his book was burnt? Kid Sonic
*You'll have to watch it to see. JuJube 02:17, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Victoream's Reapprearance

message: Since the links to photobuckt images of the mamodo spells were removed from the Zatch Bell! Character List article, shouldn't they be removed from this page for the same reason? XxKibaxX 15:59, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Photobucket Links
Talk:Zawinski's law of software envelopment

message: A past edit by 87.196.60.115 removed Google from the list of examples (Mozilla, Emacs), with the comment google is not a program. I actually think Google is a useful example. I admit that it isn't a program in the traditional (Web 1.0?) sense, but the two products GMail and Google Desktop both both do mail. With the changing meaning of 'program', I wonder what other wikipedian's views are on this? I also appeal to the name of the law referring to 'software' giving it a very general flavour. DLeonard 05:24, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "...referring to 'software'..." I hear that the next Gorillaz CD will include an email client in its extras.... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 202.27.216.35 (talk) 10:30, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is Google a useful example? 

message: So can someone who knows WTF this is about add the info to the target article... Stub Mandrel (talk) 09:03, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: For what it's worth, the target page used to have a subsection 'Zawinski's law of software envelopment' (see ) but it was removed a few days ago () by . Anyway, there's a relevant AFD from 2011 at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zawinski's law of software envelopment that ended as "Merge". I gueass that's a (weak) argument to restore the removed content. – Tea2min (talk) 11:20, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: One cannot restore inadequately referenced content. Find proper references, and we are good. So far all I saw was undue promotion of an average software engineer.  Staszek Lem (talk) 16:21, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Restored. Staszek Lem (talk) 16:32, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  THIS REDIRECT GOES TO A PAGE THAT DOES NOT MENTION THE SUBJECT OF THE REDIRECT
Talk:2004 NBA draft

message: Wasn't Luol Deng technically a British citizen when he was drafted?  I'm not completely clear on his situation, but I know he lived in the UK and was widely reported as being a 'British basketball player' in the media during the draft even if he was born in the Sudan.  If he holds British citizenship, shouldn't that make the United Kingdom his nation, rather than Sudan?  --Jakob Huneycutt 01:46, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Luol Deng's Nationality
Talk:Tim Louis (British Columbia politician)

message: I'm bringing the article up to date and tightening it up as befots a now-defeated municipal pol. This laundry list of the committees Louis served on is, frankly, cruft, especially as he is no longer on council. If anyone can mention truly significant achievments of Louis's on council, put 'em in the article, but IMO we don't need to know every board and committee the guy sat on. Ianking 01:48, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup
Talk:Before the Storm (novel)

message: Not done Dark jedi requiem 01:52, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Shield of Lies

message: Not Done. Dark jedi requiem 01:53, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Brakel, Germany

message: Who the heck is Ria Sommer-Larsen?
My friend is from Brakel, and has never heard of this "popular German entertainer." 
Google has no entries for him/her.
Seems like a bogus entry or an attempt to promote an amateur entertainer.
: I deleted the info. This "popular entertainer" doesn't even have a phone book entry. Most probably a hoax. --Edge 20:47, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: literally who
Talk:Carlos Ezquerra

message: The bibliography section is far from complete. I'll add to it over time, but it's a big task, and many hands make light work. Richard75 (talk) 12:36, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: We also need to add his work for Spanish comics and for The Wizard, if possible. Richard75 (talk) 12:47, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography
Talk:Tyrant's Test

message: Not done. Dark jedi requiem 01:57, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Isobel Barnett

message: Why this change? She's always known as "Lady Isobel Barnett". Flapdragon 01:58, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "Lady Isobel Barnett" changed to "Isobel Lady Barnett" 

message: The style "Isobel, Lady Barnett" is quite wrong. This implies that her father was an earl, marquis or duke, and is a mere courtesy title (the daughter of a Baron or Viscount is styled "The Honourable"). The correct style is "Lady Isobel Barnett", which she herself used quite correctly throughout.
In the case of Diana, Lady Spencer (before she was married), to have styled her as the press did, as 'Lady Diana Spencer', actually elevated her to a privilege that she had not earned, so no doubt, she didn't much mind! In this instance, you have demoted Isobel Barnett, which seems a bit unfair, as no one else is doing it to the poor soul.
You had best ask the Guardian why they employ people who write about things of which they know little. (Actually that would mean that most papers would be empty!). [Anonymous]
: No, I'm afraid you are wrong, and have simply got it round the wrong way. Diana was certainly 'Lady Diana Spencer' before marriage as the daughter of a peer. The wife of a knight is styled with her first name, followed by Lady [Surname]. The form 'Lady Isobel Barnett' belongs to daughters of peers, hence some of the confusion about her supposedly aristocratic background. She might have been a stickler for precision, but she was wrong here. I think the rules used for pseudonyms should be followed here: the person's legal name, accompanied by the name by which she was 'popularly' known. --Stevouk (talk) 22:49, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Guardian is wrong 

message: Some of her inspired guesses on 'What's My Line?' were in fact whispered to her by Eamonn Andrews, who had a feudal respect for titles, rooted in his humble boyhood in Dublin. It was not for any other reason, Eamonn being strictly a one-girl guy. 86.138.158.107 (talk) 14:33, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eamonn and that title
Talk:Pat Murphy (writer)

message: The newly created biog, currently titled Pat Murphy (sports journalist) is about someone who has had at least 41 books published.
I suggest this page is renamed Pat Murphy (science fiction writer). Any objection? --Dweller (talk) 14:27, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I oppose the move. The sports journalist seems to be a ghost-writer rather than an original writer.  His page describes him as "sports writer and radio broadcaster", the only reference to his book authorship being in a quote from one of the books he has worked on (where the British Library catalogue does not list him as an author).  There are a lot of incoming links to the page for Pat Murphy (writer), all of which would need to be updated if that page was moved. More important is to ensure that the Pat Murphy disambiguation page gives good clues to help readers distinguish them, and I have now done so. PamD 08:52, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I also oppose as it would hurt readers looking for this article while not helping them get to the sports journalist any faster. However, I have updated the hatnote on this article to point directly to Pat Murphy (sports journalist) as he is the only other writer with that name. Now anyone searching for "Pat Murphy writer" will get to the journalist as quickly as they would though a dab page, if not more quickly. Station1 (talk) 04:12, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Insufficient disambiguation 

message: I have commenced a tidy-up of the Bibliography section using cite templates. Capitalization and punctuation follow standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, as much as Wikipedia templates allow it. ISBNs and other persistent identifiers, where available, are commented out, but still available for reference. Feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 11:21, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography