lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Anna Vissi (1981 album)

message: This article is one in a series that has been subjected to disruptive editing for several months. Accordingly, it has been semi-protected. Logged in contributors who have been autoconfirmed are still able to edit the article. If you are not registered or autoconfirmed, you can still request that an edit be made to this article at this talk page. If the talk page is not active, you can place  (brackets and all) next to your suggestion, and another editor will soon review your request. See Wikipedia:Protection policy for more information. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:22, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article protected
Talk:Anna Vissi Live

message: This article is one in a series that has been subjected to disruptive editing for several months. Accordingly, it has been semi-protected for a like term. Logged in contributors who have been autoconfirmed are still able to edit the article. If you are not registered or autoconfirmed, you can still request that an edit be made to this article at this talk page. If the talk page is not active, you can place  (brackets and all) next to your suggestion, and another editor will soon review your request. See Wikipedia:Protection policy for more information. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:52, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article protected
Talk:Hymenophyllaceae

message: There are 18 species of Hymenophyllaceae present in the South America southern rainforest (Chile with a flowover into Argentina). They go by the name "hierba pelicula". I'll feel more comfortable if a botanist edits the text, but if no one is around, I'll do.
--Lupo Manaro 11:02, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hymenophyllaceae in SA southern rainforest 
Talk:Another Side (Corbin Bleu album)

message: Corbin stated on Radio Disney that he is coming out with his 2nd album. Also op.com (a clothing line that he advertises for) stated that as well. Does anyone know about this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.240.33.241 (talk) 22:12, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  2nd Album
Talk:Osmundastrum cinnamomeum

message: *
Choess (talk) 04:21, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional resources

message: The species name, cinnamomeum, is in agreement with The Plant List http://www.theplantlist.org/tpl1.1/record/tro-26607565 and with GRIN http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/tax_search.pl. Both are authoritative sources. Most authoritative sources, including ITIS http://www.itis.gov/servlet/SingleRpt/SingleRpt?search_topic=TSN&search_value=897944, spell the name cinnamomea. 
Clarification as to which is correct and why, or at least the nature of the disagreement, is needed.
Johnvalo (talk) 19:30, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Species Name
Talk:Polystichum acrostichoides

message: *
:Examining tradeoffs between reproduction and growth. Choess (talk) 04:17, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional resources

message: A short sentence at introduction says: "It is naturalized in Europe". The cited source, Flora of North America indeed tells: "naturalized in Europe", but nothing else. However, i don't know of any report about naturalized Christmas fern in Europe, thus do suspect the author of the cited page at Flora of North America could have mixed it up with Polystichum munitum, Western sword fern, which is known to be naturalized locally at British Isles. Since there is no reliable evidence of naturalized P. acrostichoides in Europe, i do suggest to delete the statement about naturalization. Stamnariophilus 18:15, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing evidence of naturalized populations in Europe
Talk:Antología (Marcos Witt album)

message: One or more of the recent edits to this article appear to have been vandalism or test edits (and one editor has been blocked for non-constructive editing) but it would help if someone with more subject-matter knowledge were to double-check the track listings for this album. Etamni | ✉ | ✓  03:44, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible vandalism
Talk:Silver fern

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Silver fern (redirects) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 2#Silver fern (redirects) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  1234qwer1234qwer4 14:51, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Silver fern (redirects)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Sphaeropteris cooperi

message: After the statement about C. cooperi's invasiveness, I removed:
"The Hawaiian Islands are home to four species of endemic tree fern of the genus Cibotium (Dicksoniaceae)."
...as it seemed irrelevant without a context.
A relevant context would be that C.c. threatens the existence and habitat of endemic Cibotium in Hawaii, but I don't have a ready reference, so won't include this statement.
Other interested parties may see:
Notes on the Status of an Invasive Australian Tree Fern (Cyathea cooperi) in Hawaiian Rain Forests
A. C. Medeiros, L. L. Loope, T. Flynn, S. J. Anderson, L. W. Cuddihy, K. A. Wilson
American Fern Journal, Vol. 82, No. 1 (Jan. - Mar., 1992), pp. 27-33
doi:10.2307/1547758
...or other sources to see if such a statement could be supported by the literature.
philiptdotcom 18:00, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  ref to Cibotium in Hawaii irrelevant, unless...
Talk:Dathema

message: This is an article on just a few short sentences in 1 Maccabees - just a name, pretty much.  A permanent stub.  Perhaps the article's scope should be expanded to essentially all of 1 Maccabees Chapter 5?  Maccabee campaign in Palestine or something?  The main problem is the title...  the contemporary term would be to identify each land individually (Idumea, Galilee, Gilead, Samaria, etc.) but that would be unwieldly.  "Coele-Syria" is too broad, that includes lots of territory that was unaffected.  Modern scholars would use either "Palestine" or "Eretz Israel / Land of Israel", both of which are ahistorical, and will raise the ire of the side that prefers the "other" term.  Any talk page watchers with an opinion on this out there?  SnowFire (talk) 18:45, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I ended up just creating a new article, Maccabee campaigns of 163 BC, rather than moving / re-scoping this one.  SnowFire (talk) 18:27, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expand scope of article?
Talk:Alsophila rosenstockii

message: The Wikipedia:Typo Team/moss spell checker has found a possible typo that a copyeditor needs help to resolve. If adages is misspelled, it can just be corrected in this article. If adages is a legitimate word, it should be added to the English Wiktionary (which defines words in all languages) with a definition at wikt:adages. Feel free to leave a note in this section if you do one of those things, or if you can provide any hints about this word. Thanks! -- Elfabet (talk) 16:41, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Is adages a typo or a real word?
Talk:As Kanoume Apopse Mian Arhi

message: This article is one in a series that has been subjected to disruptive editing for several months. Accordingly, it has been semi-protected. Logged in contributors who have been autoconfirmed are still able to edit the article. If you are not registered or autoconfirmed, you can still request that an edit be made to this article at this talk page. If the talk page is not active, you can place  (brackets and all) next to your suggestion, and another editor will soon review your request. See Wikipedia:Protection policy for more information. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:18, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article protected
Talk:Sunshine / At the Drive-In

message: Should this be titled Sunshine / At the Drive-In or At the Drive-In / Sunshine?  Please discuss and arrive at consensus here before moving back and forth.  I'm going to remove the speedy tag for now because it's been there for a day with no one willing to do it.  I don't know which is correct and "per MOSALBUM" doesn't explain it.  Regards, Quarl (talk) 05:52, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The album is a split album with no official title (it doesn't even have cover art). The de facto title is simply the names of the two artists who split the album. The naming convention for untitled splits per MOS:ALBUM is to title the article by the name of the artists, separated by a slash, starting with the artist who either appears on the A-side or has their tracks first on the CD. Sunshine's tracks comprise the first ⅔ of this split CD, therefore the proper article title is Sunshine / At the Drive-in. It was moved under the claim that more sources refer to it the other way around, but that's merely because At the Drive-In is the more famous of the two artists. The CD has no actual title, and the article should be titled according to the same convention as all other split albums. --IllaZilla (talk) 06:32, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Got it---thanks for the careful explanation.  I did the move. Quarl (talk) 07:42, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Sunshine / At the Drive-In]] vs [[At the Drive-In / Sunshine]]
Talk:Florence L. Barclay

message: I hate to be picky, but IMDB.com shows only 
two movies, one Mexican, the other French, 
and a Mexican TV series, as having been made
from Ms. Barclay's novel, "The Rosary".
User:Smaxam (talk) 04:58, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Five Movies From The Rosary?
Talk:Attractive Nuisance

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
*Support as nom. Right now, a user who types Attractive Nuisance into the search page goes to a different page than a user who types Attractive nuisance into the search page. The hatnotes on each page linking to the other are good, but having both search terms go to the same page is desirable. Most people who search on the term are expecting the legal doctrine, and for those who don't, the hatnote sends them to the right place. --Guy Macon (talk) 03:19, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:William Bruce (architect)

message: A perfectly good well-rounded article, I feel. Comprehensive, sourced, illustrated, polished. Shimgray | talk | 20:50, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have to disagree, there are at most 5 sources, if anything this feels like the bare bottom research paper written by a high school student, hardly a featured article on wikipedia. Maybe I'm wrong I just figured Wikipedia had a little higher standards for their featured articles, but then again I really don't edit articles as often as I should. fullphaser 23:50, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Bare bottom? I assure you I kept my pants on throughout! But I'd be delighted if you could improve the article. Thanks, Jonathan Oldenbuck (talk) 09:33, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good article 

message: Dear fellow contributors
MOSNUM no longer encourages date autoformatting, having evolved over the past year or so from the mandatory to the optional after much discussion there and elsewhere of the disadvantages of the system. Related to this, MOSNUM prescribes rules for the raw formatting, irrespective of whether a date is autoformatted or not). MOSLINK and CONTEXT are consistent with this. 
There are at least six disadvantages in using date-autoformatting, which I've capped here:
Removal has generally been met with positive responses by editors. Does anyone object if I remove it from the main text in a few days’ time on a trial basis? The original input formatting would be seen by all WPians, not just the huge number of visitors; it would be plain, unobtrusive text, which would give greater prominence to the high-value links. Tony (talk) 11:37, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to remove date-autoformatting 

message: There appears to be some confusion over who exactly built which part of Heriot's when. At one time there was a popular fallacy that it had been designed by Inigo Jones and this found its way into Chamber's Encylopaedia. If you consult the Wikipedia articles on William Wallace, William Aytoun, John Mylne and his nephew Robert Mylne, you will see the dates don't add up. The joker in the pack seems to be John Mylne. The school's own website makes no mention of him. Also, the school believes that Robert Mylne designed the clock tower, whereas the Wikipedia article has Mylne carrying out its completion to designs by Sir William Bruce. Confusing.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.102.111.38 (talk) 07:41, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who really built Heriot's?
Talk:Ear-reddening game

message: I came to this page because it was the top Google search result for "ear-reddening move" which I wanted to describe the history of as a side note to a conversation about something other than Go.  Useful and notable in my eyes, in spite of the notability flag. Aliza250 (talk) 21:15, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:AW II

message: Why is this album so hard to find?  Should there be something on the page about how it was basically unavailable through traditional music purchasing venues from the get-go? Psychlohexane (talk) 07:47, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Availability??
Talk:Don Messer's Jubilee

message: Please note the lack of any references or citations. I remember this program as very good and deserving of a page.1archie99 (talk) 01:05, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Awake (Josh Groban album)

message: In his autobiography, David Foster said he was not able to produce this album, because of his divorce proceedings at the time.  It would be nice to list the producers of each track, as this would help us understand how producers influence the sound  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skysong263 (talk • contribs) 22:07, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  producers
Talk:B-Sides and Rarities (Cake album)

message: It was listed as a Sinatra cover, but Wayne Newton's version is equally famous-- and the way Cake covers the song is MUCH more similar to Newton's version than Sinatra-- in arrangement, vocal delivery, etc. I think it's safe to say they're covering the Newton version.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.205.34.4 (talk) 18:19, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Strangers in the Night" 

message: The caption of the alternate cover posted may be correct, but it also may be misleading. The alternate cover looks like the "red/fresh cut roses" cover mentioned in the article. Also, do we want to show 5 alternate covers? --Wiki Pig5 (talk) 23:31, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternate covers 

message: I can't verify that DJ Greyboy had anything to do with this track; there are no references to either "cake" or "conroy" on DJ Greyboy's official site and there are no references to "greyboy" on Cake's official site.  Searching for just greyboy and conroy turns up nothing authoritative, featuring mostly lyrics and ways to download it, likely all from the same source and certainly not something you can trust (remember the old Napster days when everything was mislabeled?).  There are some reviews there, but I wouldn't be surprised if this was due to reviewers downloading the mislabeled rip.  The amazon page also lacks any mention of Greyboy. --Adam KatzΔtalk 15:34, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conroy as a DJ Greyboy remix 
Talk:Sounddogs

message: I have removed the {prod} tag. Primary reason for deletion was "This article is "spammy," and doesn't appear to have enough distinguished value." I removed the advertisement-like sections and rewritten what's left; as a stub-size article, it should be POV-free. Ourai т с 22:21, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: March 8, 2007 deletion discussion
Talk:Too Hood 2 Be Hollywood

message: Young Buck And Plies Are On That Song
:Removed your link, don't encourage illegal downloads. Also just because they are on a version of the song leaked AFTER the albums release, doesn't mean anything. They are not on the official version so it is irrelevant. SE KinG. User page. Talk. 06:46, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  do you even have the album? i do and there both on it  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.3.59.151 (talk) 06:00, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nigga Owe Me Some Money 
Talk:Simeon ben Gamliel

message: Would there be any objection to switch the date notation to Common Era (BCE/CE) rather than Christ-centric BC/AD? See WP:MOSDATE for more. ←Humus sapiens ну? 22:26, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Date notation

message: Would it be a good idea to note that he is cited in Mishnah Keritot 1:7, Babylonian Talmud Keritot 8a as obtaining a ruling that dropped the price of sacrificial birds?  and other rulings of his?  
Patrij (talk) 14:59, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mishnaic note? 

message: If this R. Shimon b. Gamliel lived until Hadrian martyred a number of rabbis, he was a really old dude because that happened when he was 140.  Did R. Gamaliel II have a son Shimon?
Patrij (talk) 15:02, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timing?
Talk:Band on the Run: 25th Anniversary Edition

message: I think this article should be merged. They're practically the same album, only the 25th Anniversary Edition has a disc two. I'm in favor of merging. Anyone else? Karen Carpenter's Biggest Fan 02:33, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Definitely agree it should be merged. There's not enough here to justify a separate article. Pawnkingthree (talk) 12:10, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

text: Merge.  I agree with almost all of you.  This is just a special edition of Band on the Run, not a different album, and should be listed in the same article. - AyaK (talk) 01:03, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

text: Merge: One more vote to merge. joeinthebox (talk) 09:13, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

text: Merge: I approve of above idea. Fugreena (talk) 16:19, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge w/Band on the Run
Talk:Banking, Violence and the Inner Life Today

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:hiftxqr0ld6e. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:22, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Banned in D.C.

message: I came here looking for info on what version of 'At The Movies' can be found on 'Banned...'. I really doubt that it's a different mix of the 'Rock For Light' version, it sounds like two completely different recordings. May be someone could clean up the info on the songs' original  releases? At the moment they seem to mirror (faulty?) Discogs information. 84.63.60.159 (talk) 16:15, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Song versions
Talk:Bavarian Fruit Bread

message: The credits on the At the Doorway Again EP say McQuillan and Browne played on "Around My Smile". The credits on Bavarian Fruit Bread don't use song titles, but say both McQuillan and Browne play on tracks 4 (undisputedly "On the Low") and 11. "Around My Smile" from the At the Doorway Again EP is identical to track 11 on the Bavarian Fruit Bread CD. Hence, track 11 on the CD has to be "Around My Smile".
Track 12 on the CD is consequently "Lose Me on the Way" — plus, just listen to the lyrics.
On the Japanese and Australian versions, "Sparkly", originally from the At the Doorway Again EP, appears as the 13th track. It is not the 12th track on any release.
Poussiere (talk) 01:22, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Track List
Talk:William Foulke (footballer)

message: Does Fatty "only" weight 150 kg ? In the Guiness World Record 2001, he's the fatest football player ever, and then he weight 165 kg.
What's that in English measures? They certainly wouldn't have used metric at the time. Lenzar (talk) 16:35, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: From Dundee Courier on Thursday 21 September 1899:
September, 1896. 15st 12lbs
September, 1897, 18st 7 1/2lbs
September, 1898, 19st 3lbs
September, 1899, 20st 3lbs  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.104.212.242 (talk) 10:44, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  His weight year on year
Talk:B Stiff (EP)

message: I don't know why someone said that "Sloppy" was not released on CD: I have the original B-Stiff EP and I confirm that it's the very same version as "Recombo DNA".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.148.181.148 (talk) 20:24, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ceratopteris thalictroides

message: Is that a dialectical thing?  I'm in America, and that's not what manure means here. --142.163.194.161 (talk) 20:52, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "the plant can be used as a manure for rice"
Talk:Actuarial escape velocity

message: Hi, everyone.  I just finished reading the actuarial escape velocity article and was put off by the idea of this being science fiction, as opposed to speculative science.  If I'm correct, most science is heavily speculative because of the nature of wanting to learn and understand using collective ideas and intelligence to form a conclusion or theory, etc.  If there is no speculation, there is no science or willingness to think ahead.
So, I am proposing that instead of using the "science fiction" article stub label, we should establish a "Singularity" stub label, because the idea of actuarial escape velocity and the Singularity seems plausible enough, given the correct volume of absorbed literature.  There is a lot of talk about the Singularity these days, so I think this proposition is reasonable enough.  Any feedback? Dylan Knight Rogers 22:36, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: All new stub tags and categories must be proposed and approved at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals.  Generally, a minimum of 60 articles is needed to create a new stub category.  For now, science fiction seems to be the closest existing category to speculative science.  Science fiction, it could be argued, is merely the more fanciful end of speculative science. — Swpb talk contribs 23:58, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speculative science versus science fiction
Talk:Giovanni Antonio Scopoli

message: Scop. offical abreviature for authority Scopoli
--Penarc 19:12, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Scopoli

message: Can anyone explain why:
*the nationality of Scopoli points to Tyrol (state), a modern Austrian land, when he was born in Val di Fiemme, an Italian valley at that time part of the bishopric of Trent?
*What does it mean that his father was "of Italian origin"? Was his family autochthonous or not?
Thanks, Alex2006 (talk) 14:58, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: In addition, what is meant by his being "anational"? Cosmopolitanism? Ypna (talk) 12:48, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Nationality