lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Political divisions of Bosnia and Herzegovina

message: Just in case this wasn't noticed already at Talk:Regions of Republika Srpska... the five regions seem to be dubious. --Joy [shallot] 13:38, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC)

message: On the website of the parliament of FBiH, Mostar is divided in two: http://www.parlamentfbih.gov.ba/js/mapavel3.jpg  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.78.17.162 (talk) 11:19, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mostar 

message: Hi – I'm wondering what makes these divisions political rather than administrative; is it that they're contingent on the Dayton agreement, i.e. not meant to be regarded as long-term...?  Thanks, David Kernow (talk) 07:10, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Political" 

message: The first paragraph of the article, concerning the Dayton Accords, sounds really biased against them. Qscgy256 (talk) 17:43, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The biased-sounding revision was the work of a blocked user. Reverted.--Zoupan 02:19, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dayton Accords 

message: I support 's proposed merger of Constitutional reform in Bosnia and Herzegovina into this article. Two separate articles are viable, but what we have at present is two sub-standard, poorly referenced and dated articles, so let's merge what we do have and try to improve it. If the merged article grows significantly, then we can consider splitting it again. Cordless Larry (talk) 11:50, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.--Zoupan 11:57, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed and  Klbrain (talk) 21:28, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Ludics

message: Girard's paper introducing Ludics, Locus solum: from the logic of rules to the rules of logic, has some features that may be seen as eccentric for a publication in mathematical logic (such as illustrations of Positive Skunks). — what is the purpose of this comment, and why does it belong in Wikipedia? Perhaps you would prefer his Bulletin of Symbolic Logic paper, which is slightly less confrontational? — Kaustuv 14:52, 2004 Aug 16 (UTC)
:It has to be said that illustrations of postivie skunks *are* rather unusual and eccentric. That is not a criticism, it is an observation surely? Francis Davey 18:50, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I'd suggest that communicating the color and flavor of Girard's work is actually a quite valuable addition. One of the many reasons his work is exceptional is that he gives exposition of his his unconventional conclusions by unconventional (which is not to say unconvincing) means. I'd wager that his his unorthodox discoveries in logic are not entirely separable from his unorthodox rhetoric. Shonfeder (talk) 18:18, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
Talk:Library (biology)

message: I am a bit unhappy about this article because I do not think that library in this biological sense is really a topic for explanation: it is a technical usage of a word worthy only of definition. 
To avoid a stub I suggest we delete this page but carry the text of alternative meaning back onto the referring page. Alternatively can anyone possibly think of anything else to say on this? --BozMo|talk 15:15, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Pejorative terms for failed gender roles

message: doesn't it just suck? the way people critisize others because of the way the look or act without even getting to know that person, inagine if everyone in the world did that, we'd have nothing! 
nobody would have a job, because any employers "wouldn't like the look"of most prospective employees
in fact there woul be very little co-operation at all and the world would be such a small minded place.
thank god (or whoever) for open minded people!
Selphie 15:15, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Gladys Rodriguez

message: I've removed :Category:Puerto Rican people from this article twice now. It's redundant due to the fact that this article is already a member of "Puerto Rican actors and actresses" and "Puerto Rican comedians", both of which are direct subcategories of Puerto Rican people. The first line of Wikipedia:Categorization#General naming conventions reads "Articles should be placed in the most specific categories possible" - the "people" category is too general, IMO. Bryan 15:27, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Hermitage AOC

message: I removed "The variety has been hybridised with Pinot Noir as Pinotage. The resulting vines are cultivated in South Africa and Zimbabwe" as Hermitage as used in this entry is referring to the wines of the Hemitage region and not a variety.
----
Moved to Hermitage AOC to be consistent with other AOC entries Justinc 23:51, 1 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Ancient warfare

message: I recall that the "chariots" section and the first paragraph of the "Egypt" section had also been present, word for word, in the computer game Age of Empires 1, which was quite popular in its time. As Age of Empires 1 precedes Wikipedia, I have to ask whether this article plagiarizes it or whether they both originate from the same source.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anvilsmith (talk • contribs) 13:37, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Age of Empires 1 and potential plagiarism

message: The definition of "ancient", which refers to the fall of Rome, seems suitable only for the Mediterranean. How would you define ancient with regard to China, for instance? Burschik 06:42, 28 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: "Ancient"

message: I'm removing the headings that have no information.
*Strategy, tactics, and weapons (changing to "Tactics and weapons")
**Armies
**Strategy
*(Removing from "Cultures")
**Sumerian
**Israel, Judea, and Samaria
**Korean
**Etruscan
**British Islander
**Celtic
:Maurreen 01:59, 17 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Removing headings

message: Hello 119.252.119.73 (talk) 08:26, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Social studies
Talk:2004 Summer Paralympics

message: Proposed as Collaboration of the week for August 14.At the moment this has the most votes for this ,so worth making an effort to add information to make into a good article. --Ludek9 06:21, 7 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposal

message: I'm quite surprised that there is no mention of the fact that no American network decided to cover these games, it caused considerable controversy and was quite a big story in the UK. A google search turns up a number of hits! 82.109.66.150 14:57, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Lack of American coverage
Talk:Moses Sofer

message: there was a talmid of the cahatam sofer called the Maharam Ash. any information on him? There definately exists a picture of him somewhere....
thanksgevaldik! 20:29, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a biography of the Maharam Ash in the beginning of one the works he authored. There is also a picture (painting; as he died in 1854) of him which illustrates biography & history books. Itzse 20:27, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maharam Ash? 

message: The subject's son, Rav A.S.B. Sofer, played an important role in the development of Hungarian orthodoxy, and his Torah thoughts are widely quoted. I notice we have no article about him. Does anyone have a good resource that I could use for background reading? Alternatively, is anyone willing to start off this article? JFW | T@lk 12:21, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The first biography of him was written by his son who called it Ohel Leah. It is printed in front of the sefer Ksav Sofer al Hatorah. More first hand information can be gotten from Chut Hameshulesh & Igrois Sofrim. If someone starts it I'll try to find time to edit it with more information. Itzse 23:23, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ktav Sofer 

message: The hyphen in "post-humously" seems rather non-standard. (Or rather, let's say -- quite incorrect.) Toddcs (talk) 18:03, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "post-humously published works"
Talk:Peter Crampton (politician)

message: Please note that there are two individuals by the name of "Peter Crampton."  One of them is a Member of the European Parliament for Hull, representing the Labour Party in the United Kingdom.  The other appears to be a recent college graduate.  Only the description of the former is appropriate for Wikipedia articles.  The latter's description has been nominated for deletion on the basis of being a vanity article.
To the author of that article:  Please consider logging in and getting an account at Wikipedia.  As a registered user, you will have a personal page upon which you can outline personal details.  However, Wikipedia articles are reserved for persons and cultural items that are notable.  If there is a claim to be made for the notability of the younger Peter Crampton, please establsih it, and Wikipedia can disambiguate between the two figures.  Geogre 17:28, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Charleston (dance move)

message: Into and Out Of Kick Throughs: Two timings. From Charleston and from Frankie Manning.
Hacksaw Charleston: Two kicks forward, two kick back.
Walking Charleston: Keep walking. Back and forth.
Walking Charleston: Tap the foot at end of direction, 3 times or 5 times.
Mikkalai 17:33, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  To Do 

message: PlainJane 11:32, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 20s charleston
Template talk:Message box

message: Check out Harry Potter (character). The spoilers box covers the table, atleast in my version of IE. Aris Katsaris 00:35, 17 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overlapping box/table 

message: #Cantus 02:46, Aug 18, 2004 (UTC)
#  —siroχo 02:30, Aug 21, 2004 (UTC)
#• Benc • 08:45, 26 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Support 

message: #blankfaze | (беседа!) 02:49, 18 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oppose 

message: Seems dumb that some of the templates that use this metatemplate are protected, but this one is not. I guess it hasn't been hit with vandalism yet, but someone may catch on. – flamuraiTM 18:44, Feb 6, 2005 (UTC)
:This page is now protected from edits by non-sysops, considering how important it is to all those other templates. - Mark 14:56, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  protect? 

message: I figure I should get a consensus before implementing this, since reverts in a meta-template could get hairy for its transclusions.  Would anyone object to the addition of another parameter, image2, which would add a second image on the right side of the box?  Specifically, I'm looking at adding a scales of justice icon to TotallyDisputed-section, a template that deals with both factual accuracy and neutrality (two subjects seems to merit two images).
Proposed code change:


45px|		45px|


Usage idea for TotallyDisputed-section:
	The neutrality and factual accuracy of this section are disputed.Please see the relevant discussion on the talk page.	
I could imagine other templates may use this as well.
~ Booya Bazooka 00:20, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding a second image
Talk:Internet

message: The internet usually means the connection between two or more devices from different sources such as from a Samsung Galaxy AO4 to an iPhone 13 Pro Max. It may involve connecting wirelessly.  Courtesy Smith (talk) 18:52, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: So? 2001:8003:9100:2C01:E910:5CCB:3DC2:FC81 (talk) 01:09, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Internet 

message: Why the Internet  is so popular, giving reasons such as the amount of information available and the speeds of assessing information?
Information on the Internet tends to be up-to-date because it is quicker and easier to amend web page then it is to, for example, reprint books.
Why Internet searches are not always a fast way of finding information.
When using search engines, there is always the danger of information overload. It is possible to find millions of website that match the given criteria. Unless the user narrow down their search criteria, it can take long time to find out exactly what  they are looking for see figures 10.9 to 10.11.
Why it is not always easy to find reliable information on the Internet?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.192.226.30 (talk) 06:25, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: These are good questions, but I think it would be difficult to address them in an encyclopedic fashion. The article would need to address this by citing facts and well-researched opinions from reputable sources. Rp (talk) 10:25, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. 2001:8003:9100:2C01:E910:5CCB:3DC2:FC81 (talk) 01:13, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

text: @ 2.90.197.82 (talk) 14:43, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 9 November 2023 

message: Please change "India's 28%" to "India's 60%" Reference 101 is correct, just uses wrong column for statistic, should be Penetration% Population not Users% Asia. NoLegsMcGee (talk) 23:12, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Verified and  ~Kvng (talk) 15:03, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 7 February 2024 

message: internet is owned by fergie brynil prasad also know as simon A prasad born 19-19-1985 203.86.199.60 (talk) 11:17, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Myrealnamm (💬pros · ✏️cons) 15:29, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 1 June 2024
Category talk:Demoscene

message: Is :Category:Art the right parent category for Demoscene? Question raised at Category_talk:Art#Problem_classifications.
:Its the first time I've come across Demoscene as a topic. :Category:Demoscene is a sub category of Art. I'm not sure that is the best place for it, but equally I'm not sure where else it should go. Perhaps as a subcat of :Category:Computer art if we had one. -- Solipsist 18:11, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Harm reduction

message: — Assignment last updated by AleutianTea (talk) 18:59, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Global Poverty and Practice

message: And copy/paste Nasal septum perforation 94.255.152.53 (talk) 18:49, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Routes of administration: Add a "Nasal administration" sub-section
Talk:Celebration (party)

message: Maybe this should be made a disambiguation page.  Why is it that articles on some topics are written by people who know only the most commonplace colloquial meaning of a word?  If I say that the Parthenon is the most celebrated buidling in Athens, or that Einstein was a celebrated physicist, or that the Archbishop of Canterbury celebrates certain rites, I'm not writing about a party. Michael Hardy 19:02, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree (with the disambiguation or top-level + detail) page. Pavel Vozenilek 14:40, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)

message: Support. Celebration (party) should be merged to party then deleted. Everything that could or should be covered in celebration is and will be covered in party. 24.126.199.129 02:44, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Sterling Newberry

message: Stirling, just wondering:  I know it's not you, etc. etc., but is this a refutation?  In case the link doesn't work, it says "Cosslett, V.E.  	British physicist, constructed the first microfocus X-ray tube as a part of his "Shadow X-ray microscope" in 1951 (Nature 10, 1951, pp 24). He started out of a suggestion by M. v. Ardenne."  Just wondering.  Could you give more detail on the invention?  Thanks.  Geogre 19:32, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Jesus/Archive 8

message: I have archived much of the content of this Talk page to Talk:Jesus archive 7 because it was way too long.  If anyone feels that I archived something that was still an open topic, please feel free to retrieve it from the archive page and re-insert it.  I tried to leave discussions that had recent activity or seemed to be unresolved, based on my admittedly hasty judgment.  Alanyst 05:56, 5 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archived this Talk page
Talk:Axiom of countability

message: I totally agree with Prumpf's “However, "axioms" of countability define no such structure, and they're not statements so obvious they could be accepted as self-evident either.” argument. And I believe we should re-write this article in the following mood: 
:Axiom of countability is an axiom to define second-countable space:
:# (Axiom of union of any)The union of any collection of sets in \tau is also in \tau.
:# (Axiom of intersection of finite)The intersection of any 2 sets in \tau is also in \tau.
:# (Axiom of countability-2nd)There exist a countable collection of \tau, such that every members of \tau can be written as a union of elements of this collection.
By such kinds of definition the "axiom of countability" does define 2 structure - first and second-countable space, and naturally, become axioms. --––虞海 (Yú Hǎi) 11:08, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mood 

message: Since the term "open" is used for describing sets and subsets, there needs to be some reference to its definition. What's in this page is insufficient. There is a Wiki page on "Open Sets" that should probably be referenced.
Michael McGinnis (talk) 19:55, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Open Sets needs definition
Talk:Juicy Juice

message: This is advertising...
Most likely, yes. But that doesn't keep anyone from making more informative entries. As far as I can tell, none of the statements on the page are false, just overzealous. - Quinine 00:03, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

message: I'm just another anonymous user, but I spotted this on the article "Juicy Juice Cherry tastes like motor oil." 12:00pm, Sunday, 14th of May, 2006
*You are free to edit that, but I'll do it right now. Rlevse 11:56, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible tampering and vandelization 

message: This page appears to be a direct copy from sections of Juicy Juice's home page []. Isn't this a copyright issue?  Seems too much to be fair use?  Am I wrong? --Benabik 05:09, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You are absolutely correct, and I've removed the offending material.  Now, how on Earth did this page end up on my watchlist? ~CS 05:43, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Direct Copy from Site? 

message: This article seems biased.  I just made some changes, but I think it may  still need to be cleaned up
75.182.106.197 21:49, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias 

message: They may be 100 percent juice, but not the juice you're expecting to get. It's all apple, grape, and pear, because those are cheap.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.122.63.142 (talk) 16:06, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Right. I added that to the article. Also, I just tasted the cherry, and it tastes like apple - because it is apple. Grundle2600 (talk) 19:10, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This information was removed at some point. I'll try to find some sources. Just tasting like apple is not really a source, clearly original research. Fred Talk 21:46, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The ingredients label should count as a reliable source. Lngt1124 (talk) 23:35, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The label is a reliable source for what is in the bottle, the copyright date of their logo, the location of the bottling plant, the volume of juice in the bottle, etc. The question is why we would include any of this trivial material. To mention which juices there are more of than which others, we need a reliable secondary source. Otherwise, this is trivial information. If it "should be mentioned", clearly a reliable source will have mentioned this. - SummerPhD (talk) 02:43, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Something what needs to be mentioned 
Talk:List of films set in Toronto

message: Just so I understand the intention of this list, which I did not add the original link, is it to list movies only in which it is said they are in Toronto and/or movies actually filmed in Toronto? SD6-Agent 20:16, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Judging by the name of the list, and the fact that Going the Distance is actually set in Toronto, I think that there must be a different list for movies filmed in Toronto (if not, you can create one) -Frazzydee 20:20, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC)

text: It's only for movies that take place in Toronto in the story.  --Arctic Gnome 17:32, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Taiwanese People's Party

message: Good job with this one, A-giau.  -- Kaihsu 20:18, 2004 Aug 16 (UTC)
: Thanks.  Improvement appreciated.  A-giau 01:35, 19 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Compliment 

message: The Template:Politics of Taiwan should not be attached to this historical party. – Kaihsu 10:51, 2005 May 10 (UTC)
:Agreed.  That template equates Taiwan with the post-war ROC state/regime.  A historical Template:Politics of Japan would be more compatible.  218.170.153.106 03:41, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template 

message: :On July 7, 1927 it put forward a "Statement of Recommendations", given to Prime Minister Hamaguchi Osachi
Problem is that Hamaguchi (apparently) did not become prime minister until 1929.  The above statement needs to be fact-checked.  A-giau 06:59, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Statement re Prime Minister Hamaguchi
Talk:The Sacramento Bee

message: The State Treasurer impeached in 1857 was Henry Bates, not Ronald Button.  Button held the office in *1957*.  Looks like someone read the Bee had investigated the office holder of 1857 and looked up the name of the person at that time (well, 100 years later).  It occurs to me that at no point would the name of A. Ronald Button appear in any context with this investigation or impeachment.  Moral of the story: Don't do original research, especially if you can't do it right! Huangdi 05:52, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Henry Bates

message: An editor called SacBeePublisher has edited this article, the name and the fact that they only edited this article suggests a conflict of interest.--Kevin Dewitt Always ping 06:03, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Conflict of interest
Talk:Partisan Review

message: Which one? There are at least seven famous William Phillips. --Edcolins 21:16, Aug 16, 2004 (UTC)
:I have no idea, but I don't think it's any of the ones on the disambig page. Gamaliel 02:32, 17 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text:  I added this one on the disambiguation list as William Phillips (writer). This page can help to write a short bio about him.  WouterVH 16:04, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  William Phillips 

message: Why did the magazine cease publication? Nathan0490 15:40, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  2003. Carrite (talk) 21:00, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Publication

message: What does this mean?  Does it mean once stalin came to power, after his death, what?
:: This is factually wrong, Stalin was already in power in 1934 when the magazine started. Eliminating this language. Carrite (talk) 21:00, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: after stalin

message: I've done a ground-up rewrite of the piece on this date. Carrite (talk) 05:19, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewritten
Category talk:Architects

message: Is there some distinct advantage to grouping architects by their nationality?  IMHO we would do much better to group them by their school - :Category:Modernist architects, for example. - jredmond 21:19, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Doesn't have to be either/or - add both! Stan 22:11, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: That could work.  I can see a few problems here and there when it comes to determining nationalities, but then again those are the same problems that lots of other categories deal with.  :|  - jredmond 22:27, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: This is not the places for images, that is what articles are for.  I have removed the image of Marcel Breuer. Bejnar 20:51, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Image