lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:WAYV

message: WAIV redirects here because it currently simulcasts WAYV. However, WAIV has had a long 40-year history seperate from it's association with WAYV, first as WRIO, then WSJL, then WJSX, then the 2nd NJ WSAX and WMID-FM before becoming WAIV. Plus, word here in NJ is that WAIV will soon be breaking away from the simulcast to broadcast it's own format again. So how do we get WAIV to stop redirecting to WAYV and become its own page? 68.39.76.82 (talk) 16:01, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: How to get WAIV to not redirect here?
Talk:WAZO

message: After December 31, 2010, WSFM (FM) will no longer exist. The speculation is that WUIN will move to the old WSFM frequency, and based on what I have been told, the history of the station should go with the call letters, not the frequency.
At one time, the history of WSFM and its predecessor WJYW were in this article because they were at 107.5. That would seem to make the most sense, because WAZO does not have a long history. We could just have two sections: one on the history of 107.5 (and 107.1 before that), and one on the history of 98.3 prior to 2011.Vchimpanzee ·  talk · contributions · 18:51, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger
Talk:WAZZ

message: Why is there a link to an FM station down in the external links?  Am I missing something relevant?StreamingRadioGuide (talk) 08:42, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
Talk:South Queensland Crushers

message: I have made some edits as the overall tone of this article gave rise to Brisbane Broncos fans' conspiracy theories that the Crushers were established in order to weaken or hold back the Broncos, stemming from an incorrectly assumed NSWRL bias against the Broncos.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.100.80.10 (talk) 15:33, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe there are incorrect facts as to why the Crushers were established by the NSWRL.  You can't state that the NSWRL were trying to 'hold back' the Broncos by establishing a second team in Brisbane.  This was never an official reason to start the team.  Brisbane has the population, stadia, supporter base and junior development areas to support more than 1 team.  You can't state it as fact that they were brought in to hold the Broncos back - you can state that some allege this is the reason.  The team wasn't 'hastily' developed either - the allowed them entry for 1995 in November 1992.  That is the same time given to most new licenses, including the Broncos, and more recently the Gold Coast Titans.  I think the language of the article needs to be far more neutral as to the reasons why the Crushers were established.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.100.80.10 (talk) 15:51, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Anti-NSWRL slant
Talk:Steve Walters

message: "Steven played originally for Brisbane Norths, unlike his younger brothers Kerrod and Kevin who played in their hometown of Ipswich alongside Allan Langer." - He originally played for Booval Swifts, a club in Ipswich, and Kevin also played for norths. Whoever wrote this is obviously not letting the facts get in the road of trying to construct an interesting sentence.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.77.237.167 (talk) 10:47, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It's difficult to find reliable sources for pre-Broncos Queensland rugby league. Do you have any?--Gibson Flying V (talk) 03:02, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of mammals of Chile

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations 
;What should I do?
	Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
A further notification will be placed when/if the image is deleted. This notification is provided by a Bot, currently under trial --CommonsNotification (talk) 12:55, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Flying Tadarida brasiliensis in Texas.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion
Talk:2000 Super League season

message: Was it JJB Sports or Tetley's Bitter Super League V? Each of the two sources there say one each. Can anyone find out which one it was?
--Jeff79 (talk) 11:56, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major Sponsor 
Talk:Peter Nehr

message: User:Anitanehr, the article's main author, is the subject's wife. She says that she was "assigned to establish the Wikipedia listing for my husband" (see User talk:Anitanehr). This raises an obvious WP:COI issue, as well as issues under WP:BLP. No WP:RS is cited, which implicates WP:NOR. Further, there is no indication that this first-term Florida legislator is WP:NOTE. Finell (Talk) 07:50, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Should it be prodded then?  ShadowHalo 08:23, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Candidate for deletion? 

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Jreferee (Talk) 17:52, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment
Talk:List of birds of Chile

message: Hi Craig, I saw your recent revert and I don't understand. We generally have the first letter capitalized in a list or a title, but not in the middle of a sentence or line. Does that make sense to you? For instance we wouldn't write "The Shy albatross is big", but "the shy albatross is big". Right? Thanks,  SchreiberBike | ⌨  19:15, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I got your e-mail. I agree that those are alternate names, but I still don't think we should capitalize them in the middle of a line. I try to follow the Wikipedia:Manual of Style and specifically MOS:LIFE where it says "English vernacular ("common") names are given in lower case in article prose ... and in sentence case at the start of article titles, sentences, headings and other places where the first letter of the first word is capitalized." That way a line would start "*(Southern) royal albatross" meaning that either the words "southern royal albatross" or "royal albatross" can refer to Diomedea epomophora. Thanks.  SchreiberBike | ⌨  20:17, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  Got your e-mail and I'm sorry if it feels like I'm nagging, but why still the capitalized "Southern" in the middle of the line? Thanks,  SchreiberBike | ⌨  22:58, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalization question 

message: This update performed the following:
*Change the English names of families to those used by SACC.
*Revise the genus of Blue-and-yellow tanager.
*Revise references, counts, and text to reflect these changes.
Craigthebirder (talk) 23:49, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  July 29, 2020 revisions 

message: This revision performed the following per the SACC:
*Add two species in Boobies.
*Add a species, revise the sequence of species, and revise three genera in Tyrant flycatchers.
*Add a species in Blackbirds.
*Revise the common name of Idiopsar speculifera in Tanagers.
*Revise several tags.
Craigthebirder (talk) 02:19, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  January 19, 2021 revision 

message: The following revisions are made to reflect the August 24, 2021 update by the South American Classification Committee of the American Ornithological Society. 
*Replace Gallinago paraguaiae with Magellanic snipe Gallinago magellanica.
*Replace red-eyed vireo with chivi vireo Vireo chivi.
*Revise the English name of Diuca diuca.
*Revise text, counts, and references accordingly.
Craigthebirder (talk) 14:21, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  August 2021 revision
Talk:Jac

message: While I am no scholar on the subject, I have a theory that the Old Orthodox Church, "Sfintii Arhangheli", is dated 1756 above the doorway.  However, the article states Sfintii Arhangheli was built in 1759.
I have a picture from above the doorway to Sfintii Arhangheli.  Above the door, there are two "words".  I believe it reads, in Romanian Cyrillic letters, "In 1756".
I translated the first word as "In".  I copied the Transitional Alphabet characters into Google, and I found an exact entry for "In or Into" in Old Church Slavonic (used in Eastern Catholic Churches).  The translation can be found here: Vede Ier (or Yer).  A Russian Pentateuch version of the Bible from 1825 also confirms that the word is "In" as the first word above the doorway is the first word of the first line of the Book of Genesis: Unbound Bible.
I translate the second "word" as a numeral reading, "One(-thousand) Seven-Hundred Fifty Six".  An article on Cyrillic numerals is here: Cyrillic Numerals.  Note the picture of the clock tower, the "1" and "6" look exactly like the characters above the door!
The Wikipedia article on Romanian Cyrillic Alphabet is here: Romanian Cyrillic Alphabet.  It confirms the use of the letters for numerals.
I can upload the picture if wanted-- and if can figure out how.  But, I am sure many readers are actually there!
(On another note, any pictures of Pemnita Monului???)
NewYork10023 (talk) 07:06, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age of Old Orthodox Church 

message: I'm starting to build it up :D
Enough for today :)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rul3r2003 (talk • contribs) 21:49, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Build up 

message: The infobox currently says the location is . 
Rul3r2003 has also added
, which is about 5 km away. 
I don't know which is correct, though there seems to be a group of buildings more-or-less at the first. For now, I've commented out the second; if that's more correct, the coordinates should be put in the infobox. 
—WWoods (talk) 18:11, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location?
Wikipedia talk:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:IRC channels/wikipedia-en-admins

message: Friday asks What the fuck are we doing encouraging non-transparent discussion of Wikipedia-related matters?
Because a lot of discussion about Wikipedia-related matters must be non-transparent.  For instance, you don't want OTRS volunteers going around disclosing the contents of private communications about Wikipedia, do you?  And when Jimbo shows up and holds a closed discussion, those involved are not going to blab it all over the wiki, are they?  Like any business, there are things that are confidential.
Really it surprises me that such questions are still asked by people who have been around for years. --Tony Sidaway 02:32, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, yes, of course.  That's why I also wrote that I understand that certain small groups may need confidential channels.  I didn't see anything on the page about this being (strictly) an OTRS tool.  In the recent debacle that brought this up, there was no indication that any discussion needed to be private- quite the opposite, if this had been discussed on-wiki, it seems very unlikely that it would have happened. Friday (talk) 03:03, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  There's a mix of confidential and non-confidential discussion.  It's much less formal than the wiki.  I agree that many steps were missed in the contemplation, planning and eventual execution of a bad block the other day, but I've already discussed that elsewhere.  It has made me doubt, for the first time, that the channel is completely beneficial, because I think it's clear that the editor who made the block believed himself to be executing the will of Wikipedia , and on-channel discussions may have reinforced his delusions. The editor's written justification was so bizarre that I believed he must have taken drugs or something else that impaired his ability to communicate coherently, so I'm inclined to chalk it up as a one-off (the editor has been banned from the channel for the time being).  I've heard rumors about other alleged bad blocks planned on IRC but none of them were convincing. --Tony Sidaway 06:01, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reply to Friday's query

message: I apologize for my inappropriate comments.  My comments that I should fear a block based upon my "[interaction] with some who use the channel, [when] one sees what has happened, oh, in the past twenty-four hours" impugned the entire community of administrators who use the IRC channel.  While I have outwardly expressed frustration with ill-considered blocks and insults being discussed on that channel, I understand that not everyone is party to them; my comments, however, did not distinguish between the parties and the community.  I apologize.  --Iamunknown 05:41, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  An addendum to my comments
Talk:Douglas, Isle of Man

message: External Link to Glenology- The linked page is to National Glens of the Isle of Man. None of these are in Douglas. Ripsaw 02:36, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: its a page of Manx Radio describing glens of the whole island - interesting for tourists housing in Dougglas. --SonniWP 07:30, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Lack of Relevence?

message: This section is now rather unwieldy, it might be better to provide an introduction to the built form of Douglas, the Promenades do not figure enough as part of the fabric...Manninagh1958 (talk) 15:19, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Landmarks
Talk:Zaigham Zaidi

message: 😢Pori zindgi me qasr o taqser ke elava kuch nai hai 😢😢😢
👉bas ek he chez hai jo qabele taref hai vo hai mera ishq apne imam e zamana ke sath mere zindgi ka maqsad sirf o sirf hindustan me mahdaviyat ka alam nasb karna hai or ummed hai is kam me mere moula zaror madad farmaye ge 
Bas app logo se doa hai is kare khaire me doa ke zarye madad farmaye app ka ajr inshaallah imam e zamana ke havale
اللهم عجل لولیک الفرج
 Syed zaigham gharavi (talk) 20:20, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  hafiz syed zaigham al-gharavi
Talk:1997–98 UEFA Champions League

message: Manchester United lost against AS Monaco but the legs don't match up if they won on away goals.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Inevitable4 (talk • contribs) 08:21, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: How was the draw procedure for the knockout stage to avoid that the runners-up face each other and that the runners-up face the winner of the same group? --Sayka41 (talk) 16:38, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quarterfinal/Semifinal 
Talk:Beccy Gordon

message: Would someone like to create a new page for Robyn Gordon? Presently, the page redirects to a Grevillea cultivar. Mastercampbell (talk) 03:08, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Robyn Gordon

message: "and she inducted softball into the 1992 Olympics at Barcelona, Spain. " What is this line meant to mean? 194.28.127.54 (talk) 01:36, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Softball
Talk:Five Ponds Wilderness Area

message: "This is one of the few locations in the northeastern United States where stands of virgin timber can be found"
False. There are plenty of virgin tracts of timber in the two large wilderness areas in the Catskills alone, as Michael Kudish's book can tell you; I'm sure there are stands in northern New England too. Did the article mean something else? I know I've heard it's one of the largest virgin timber stands in the country ... maybe that's what you meant? Can you provide some source for what you'ren talking about? Daniel Case 03:22, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Two things, this comes from the State Land Master Plan so I'm hesitant to doubt the claim outright.  Second, I think there's a distinction between virgin and old-growth forest.  New York has a lot of old growth forests, but nearly all of them were logged in the past.  FPWA is often described as the largest remaining stand of forest that was never logged in human history.  Ari 11:35, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't always trust the APA to get these things right. They (and DEC for that matter) have made mistakes in other planning documents.There are large tracts in the interior of, say, the Slide Mountain Wilderness Area that Kudish says show no evidence of logging (largely because they were so remote). I think what they meant here is that it's the largest stand of loggable timber (as in, something that could make money even today) that has never been cut. Let's go with "largest" instead of "only". Daniel Case 13:16, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That works for me. Ari Epstein 19:15, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Dubious claim
Talk:USS Navajo (AT-64)

message: Hello, it appears that the info provided here has made the Navajo class fleet tug entry redundant.  You should merge the engine info and max speed into this article.  Kindest regards, AlphaEta 02:52, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 2007 comment

message: So, if you believe this article,  is the lead ship of the Navajo class of sea going tugs.  But, if you believe another other article,  is the lead ship of the class.  In both articles, each is listed as .  Can both articles be right?  Trappist the monk (talk) 21:42, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Will the real Lead Ship of the class please stand up
Talk:Anif Palace

message: * (Aktuell) (Vorherige) 18:15, 7. Apr. 2007 88.191.24.59 (Diskussion) (Bilder ergänzt)
    * (Aktuell) (Vorherige) 12:13, 24. Feb. 2007 Jaer (Diskussion | Beiträge) K (Link auf BKS (Urbar) entfernt)
    * (Aktuell) (Vorherige) 01:03, 31. Jan. 2007 RobertLechner (Diskussion | Beiträge) (koordinate)
    * (Aktuell) (Vorherige) 18:04, 23. Nov. 2006 84.152.47.253 (Diskussion)
    * (Aktuell) (Vorherige) 17:57, 23. Nov. 2006 84.152.47.253 (Diskussion)
    * (Aktuell) (Vorherige) 17:55, 23. Nov. 2006 84.152.47.253 (Diskussion)
    * (Aktuell) (Vorherige) 17:53, 23. Nov. 2006 84.152.47.253 (Diskussion)
    * (Aktuell) (Vorherige) 17:50, 23. Nov. 2006 84.152.47.253 (Diskussion)
    * (Aktuell) (Vorherige) 12:00, 16. Okt. 2006 Alexander Z. (Diskussion | Beiträge) K (keine Weblinks im Fließtext)
    * (Aktuell) (Vorherige) 11:57, 16. Okt. 2006 212.66.133.50 (Diskussion)
    * (Aktuell) (Vorherige) 01:56, 9. Okt. 2006 Sir Gawain (Diskussion | Beiträge) K (→Weblinks - toten Weblink entfernt)
    * (Aktuell) (Vorherige) 13:09, 25. Sep. 2006 Salzburger (Diskussion | Beiträge) K
    * (Aktuell) (Vorherige) 10:32, 24. Sep. 2006 Sir Gawain (Diskussion | Beiträge) K (revert, hier ist nicht ein Architekturensemble gemeint)
    * (Aktuell) (Vorherige) 22:14, 23. Sep. 2006 Rs newhouse (Diskussion | Beiträge) K (linkfix)
    * (Aktuell) (Vorherige) 12:11, 6. Jul. 2006 Sir Gawain (Diskussion | Beiträge) K (typo)
    * (Aktuell) (Vorherige) 11:24, 6. Jul. 2006 62.178.84.9 (Diskussion)
    * (Aktuell) (Vorherige) 11:19, 6. Jul. 2006 62.178.84.9 (Diskussion)
    * (Aktuell) (Vorherige) 02:18, 21. Jun. 2006 Sir Gawain (Diskussion | Beiträge) K (-Weblink, da er keine weiterführenden Infos bietet)
    * (Aktuell) (Vorherige) 19:39, 20. Jun. 2006 81.86.1.245 (Diskussion) (→Weblinks)
    * (Aktuell) (Vorherige) 22:07, 12. Feb. 2006 83.64.205.100 (Diskussion)
    * (Aktuell) (Vorherige) 18:27, 30. Nov. 2005 Sir Gawain (Diskussion | Beiträge) K (linkfix)
    * (Aktuell) (Vorherige) 13:11, 30. Okt. 2005 Geiserich77 (Diskussion | Beiträge) K (kat)
    * (Aktuell) (Vorherige) 14:32, 3. Jul. 2005 Ist nicht wichtig (Diskussion | Beiträge) K (Johann Ernst Graf von Thun neu verlinkt)
    * (Aktuell) (Vorherige) 18:48, 26. Apr. 2005 Sir Gawain (Diskussion | Beiträge) K (typo)
    * (Aktuell) (Vorherige) 15:55, 14. Apr. 2005 Sir Gawain (Diskussion | Beiträge) (Bild und Links ergänzt)
    * (Aktuell) (Vorherige) 11:54, 14. Apr. 2005 Sir Gawain (Diskussion | Beiträge) K (kat)
    * (Aktuell) (Vorherige) 11:53, 14. Apr. 2005 Sir Gawain (Diskussion | Beiträge) K (+kat)
    * (Aktuell) (Vorherige) 20:17, 13. Apr. 2005 Sir Gawain (Diskussion | Beiträge) (ergänzt)
this is the author history of the German article on which this translation was based --Louisana 02:53, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Jay Mountain Wilderness Area

message: The phrase "severs an appendage" should be rephrased to be more descriptive of the geography. Edison (talk) 19:21, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Unclear term
Talk:Cherokee-class tugboat

message: Perhaps engine and max speed information should be merged with USS Navajo (AT–64) and this article should be deleted.  Kindest regards, AlphaEta 02:54, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: this is the only article on wikipedia in the WW2 realm that follows the practice of renaming the class when the lead ship goes down. 158.181.81.168 (talk) 04:56, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  wrong class name
Talk:Henry Pottinger Stephens

message: 1850 or 1851? Footnote explains the conflicting source. The bibliographical details of the Princess Grace library site are here: . Moreover, see also Tomes, Jason: "Solomon, Edward (1855–1895)", Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, online edn, Oxford University Press, accessed 25 Oct 2009, which also gives Stephens's d.o.b as 1850. I'm inclining to the view that the DNB's endorsement tips the balance in favour of 1850. The DNB also refers to Stephens as Irish, but that isn't necessarily to come down for Dublin -v- Barrow-on-Soar. The source so far quoted in the article (https://www.gsarchive.net/british/authors/stephens.html) is itself quoting another source, and on balance I'm inclined to take the direct quote from the DNB. Comments, please - Tim riley (talk) 10:51, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that the boisestate site is not always meticulous about dates.  While DNB also makes mistakes, I'd favour DNB.  -- Ssilvers (talk) 15:45, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of birth 
Talk:2008 United States Senate election in Colorado

message: Can someone find early polling for this race anywhere?
: There is currently no CO Senate poll I know of, polling will probably start in August/September 2007 ... --The Pollster 05:55, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: If the Admins are determined to continue to encourage Jerzeykydd to delete official candidates from election articles, there's no need for me to continue to waste any more of my time contributing to the articles in any attempt to make them factual, accurate, and complete. I am totally fed up. Good night, and good luck. Flatterworld (talk) 16:09, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletions of official candidates 
Talk:Saskatchewan Highway 49

message: I was wondering if both Saskatchewan Highway 49 and Manitoba Highway 49 should be merged into one article, considering the Manitoba section is less than 1 km? If a junction list was added, it could include both. I got the idea from articles such as British Columbia Highway 15, which includes Washington State Route 543, as well as Liard Highway, which covers British Columbia Highway 77 and Northwest Territories Highway 7. The article could either still remain in Saskatchewan Highway 49 or become Highway 49 (Saskatchewan–Manitoba). Thoughts? -- MuzikMachine (talk) 22:57, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger discussion for ''Saskatchewan Highway 49'' and ''Manitoba Highway 49''
Talk:Berwin Leighton Paisner

message: I would like to propose the addition of an external link to www.wikijob.co.uk - Berwin Leighton Paisner profile specifically. Thanks!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.114.149.182 (talk) 09:55, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Talk:George Dance (dramatist)

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 18:04, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Oil Springs Reservation, Cattaraugus County, New York

message: This is hilarious: 
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Oil_Springs_Reservation%2C_Cattaraugus_County%2C_New_York&oldid=447890
Particularly the demographics section.   Haplolology 03:18, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

message: What is the reason for having this and the other exta article on the reservation? Shouldn't the main article (Oil Springs Reservation) just about cover everything? They are not separate reservations. Backspace (talk) 23:44, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Reason for two extra articles?