Talk:List of tallest buildings in Seattle

message: I have listed this page at WP:RM as an uncontroversial move, with the goal of moving the page to List of tallest buildings in Seattle. 
Per this FL discussion related to the List of tallest buildings in Dallas page, it was decided that United States building lists that contain only one freestanding tower (with all other entries habitable buildings) should not be dubbed with "and structures" in the title. The change would be consistent with other U.S. tallest buildings lists, and reduce confusion, as "structures" more or less implies multiple structures, not just one observation tower. As long as a note is added to the observation tower entry, the clarification in the title is not needed. Rai-me 01:48, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please put comments at the bottom of the talk page next time and use . SounderBruce 17:32, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed Move

message: I just wanted to mention: there are pictures of most of these on the Commons. Someone might want to add a column to the tables with a 100 px picture of each (perhaps rather than having quite so many larger images in the article). - Jmabel | Talk 05:47, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've changed the list to this format. It's consistent with list of tallest buildings in New York, Chicago, Miami, etc. Doing this also fixed the whitespace below the table and removed the need to keep the captions up-to-date (One Union Square was called 17th tallest in the caption even though it's 18th in the list, presumably due to the later addition of 1918 Eighth Avenue). —Mrwojo (talk) 22:52, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures 

message: The succession box at the bottom of the Alaska Building article lists the Hoge Building as its successor for the tallest building in Seattle, while Timeline of tallest buildings lists King Street Station (Seattle) as having this distinction.  This apparent conflict should be resolved or explained. — Myasuda (talk) 03:57, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timeline of tallest buildings 

message: This list excludes interesting buildings that were very tall for their time, such as the 1927 Seattle Tower (347 ft), while including comparatively uninteresting buildings of our own time, as 400ft is not especially tall by today's standards.
Rather than a blanket cap of 400ft, it would be more interesting to have a moving cap based on building completion date.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Greglovern (talk • contribs) 17:39, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old Tall Buildings 

message: The information in this list seems highly dependent on other information. For example, I've tried to fix issues where values in feet didn't match the given values in meters by using . There were numerous statements that were out of date (simple things like "the list below contains 22 buildings" when it has 24 now). Some of the proposed buildings haven't been talked about for years, so who knows when those should be considered "not proposed". The statement that the "skyline is ranked [1st, 3rd, 11th]" is based on looking at the Emporis lists for the major cities of the US – so if any of those cities change, the statement can become out-of-date. Some simplification might be in order. —Mrwojo (talk) 23:26, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dependent and dated information 

message: Can someone provide some context for the Space Needle not being a building? That seems at least contentious enough to require a cite.  The nearest footnote to the claim ( http://skyscraperpage.com/cities/?buildingID=1294 ) refers to it as a building.  Wikipedia's 'Building' page defines a building as "Any human-made structure used or intended for supporting or sheltering any use or continuous occupancy". The 'any use' certainly seems to apply, since there's a restaurant that's being both supported and sheltered.  The implication seems to be that it's not continually occupied, but of course that applies to office buildings as well.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Simianvector (talk • contribs) 00:53, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Space Needle not a Building? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of tallest buildings in Seattle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080318052537/http://www.emporis.com/en/wm/ci/bu/sk/?id=101046 to http://www.emporis.com/en/wm/ci/bu/sk/?id=101046
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:13, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of tallest buildings in Seattle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120705094337/http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2010835965_office20.html to http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2010835965_office20.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:00, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Tallest seattle. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 25#Tallest seattle until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Regards, SONIC678 16:30, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Tallest seattle" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]