lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:James F. Byrnes

message: I've added mention of the 1946 Stuttgart speech.
I've added a more detailed description in Cold War (1947-1953), explaining it on that articles talk page as follows:
I've added the following text to the important documents section.
*Speech by James F. Byrnes,  United States Secretary of State "Restatement of Policy on Germany" Stuttgart September 6, 1946.  Also known as the "Speech of hope" it set the tone of future U.S. policy as it repudiated the Morgenthau Plan economic policies and gave the Germans hope for the future. The Western powers worst fear by now was that the poverty and hunger would drive the Germans to Communism. General Lucius Clay stated "There is no choice between being a communist on 1,500 calories a day and a believer in democracy on a thousand". The speech was also seen as a stand against the Soviet Union as it stated the firm intention of the United States to maintain a military presence in Europe indefinitely. But the heart of the message was as Byrnes stated a month later "The nub of our program was to win the German people . . . it was a battle between us and Russia over minds. . . ."
Some related external links are
* James Francis Byrnes and U.S. Policy towards Germany 1945-1947 Deutsch-Amerikanische Zentrum / James-F.-Byrnes-Institut e.V
* U.K. Policy towards Germany National Archives excerpts of Cabinet meetings.
* CNN Iron Curtain.
--Stor stark7 Talk 21:32, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Stuttgart Speech 

message: Added International relations - why wikipeoject Religion added by robot?? Mikebar (talk) 06:35, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Projects 

message: A temporary subpage at User:Polbot/fjc/James Francis Byrnes was automatically created by a perl script, based on this article at the Biographical Directory of Federal Judges. The subpage should either be merged into this article, or moved and disambiguated. Polbot (talk) 17:01, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bot-created subpage 

message: The first two paragraphs in this section contradict each other. The first says that Byrnes switched his affiliation to Republican while the second says that he never did.  I don't know which is correct, but the section cannot stand as is.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:51:CC7D:8000:2943:A4A2:23B2:D896 (talk) 15:18, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Later Political Career
Talk:Madeleine Bunting

message: Due to a backlog it is no longer possible to give comment on ratings. Please put any comments/questions on my talk page. GDon4t0 20:44, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: WP Biography Rating
Talk:National Secessionist Forces

message: AMIB this is too far. I can agree slightly with you on the VersaLife page but this is just idiocy.
2000GUN
:I didn't prod it.  did. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 09:05, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Too Far

message: A Man In Bl♟ck this is becoming rather annoying. Your edits are just completely over zealous and unnecessary. Please desist. 84.203.181.35 19:49, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Please

message: Does anyone have the NSF Logo. I cant find it.
Exiledone 17:43, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Logo
Talk:Live Search Academic

message: If it is to be merged, I'd rather it to be merged with Windows Live Search instead. Pikablu0530 09:31, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: What is the current title: I think its back to Windows Live Academic Search, or at least some other MS products are using that name for it. DGG 03:57, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: * http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=allintitle%3A+live+search+academic&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=&as_vis=0
--222.64.23.7 (talk) 05:17, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reviews from [[Google scholar]]... 

message: Microsoft Academic Search seems to be a continuation or even a revival of this product.  Either way, they both accomplish the same task with the exception that Live Search Academic had a much broader scope compared to Academic Search's focus on Computer Science related papers.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Silvie rob (talk • contribs) 17:20, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Microsoft Academic Search 
Talk:Robert Elms

message: On 23 April 2007 at about 13:00 UTC (14:00 BST), Robert Elms on his 12:00 to 15:00 BST broadcast on BBC London said that Wikipedia is "wildly inaccurate" especially as it relates to his own article. As he is a living person, it would seem appropriate to purge this article of unsourced statements.--TGC55 13:16, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia denounced by Robert Elms 

message: It's a ten year old article, not sure it still holds true particularly as he broadcasts in the afternoon, not as the article says, in the morning!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.44.234.205 (talk) 18:46, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  GLR's Top Presenter 

message: This could really do with improving. A headshot just showing the subject. TrottieTrue (talk) 02:18, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article photo 

message: Looking at previous discussions above, this has raised some valid points. This article has room for improvement. 
I have just removed the photo from the article because not only was it blurred, but it had someone else next to him who wasn't referenced, so god knows who it was. 
The article itself could do with an overhaul and some fact checking. The references mainly point to self-promotion, not necessarily on Robert's part, but nothing outstanding. 
Also, looking at the BBC Radio London schedule, it appears Robert Elms is now only on Friday to Sunday from 10am - 2pm.
Thoughts? Funky Snack (Talk | Contribs) 20:53, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article in general
Talk:French personal pronouns

message: Wouldn't it be better to have most of the text here for y & en on the French_pronouns page instead? In most of the examples, they relate to "it" or "there". Recent Runes (talk) 23:16, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think so. They can be used to refer to people (like la and le(s) can refer to things). Syntactically, all of these things belong in the same class, traditionally labeled "personal pronouns", as opposed to relative, interrogative, indefinite, etc. pronouns (even though all of those can refer to persons, too). It's just terminology. CapnPrep (talk) 00:45, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aren't 'y' & 'en' more usually not personal pronouns  

message: Are the forms moi-même, toi-même etc. classed as disjunctive pronouns? Recent Runes (talk) 22:57, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "moi-même" etc.

message: The article says "The pronoun tu is informal and singular, spoken to an individual who is equal or junior to the speaker. The pronoun vous is used in the singular (but with second-person plural verb forms) to speak to an individual who is senior to the speaker." It would be helpful to know if "junior" and "senior" are here to be taken literally, as having to do with age (or possibly tenure), or whether what is really meant includes also social standing (inferior/superior). Of course in the real (and especially the real modern) world the boundaries get smudged, but it wouldn't hurt to know where they were prior to the smudging. --Haruo (talk) 14:54, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  junior/senior vs inferior/superior  

message: The article currently reads, "In modern French, on has replaced nous as pronoun for the plural third person. Nous is used in formal usage." That seems to be saying that "nous" is plural third person, which is most certainly incorrect. 
Shouldn't it rather say, "In modern French, on has replaced nous as pronoun for the plural fist person. Nous is used in formal usage."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.126.245.210 (talk) 19:43, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  On vs. Nous 
Talk:Frank Williams Racing Cars

message: I believe the sponsor was Norev, not Politoys, though both are miniature toy car manufacturers. 159.134.94.21 11:18, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Definitely Politoys - see this 8W article. But thanks for raising something you think might be incorrect on the talk page. DH85868993 14:52, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sponsor politoys 

message: Shouldn't we merge this article with Williams F1? Even the car names are in a sequence. Isn't it the same team that changed its name? Fsarmony (talk) 16:56, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's debatable whether FWRC and WPGE/WilliamsF1 are "the same team". Frank Williams originally founded FWRC, then brought in Walter Wolf as a partner. Over time, Frank's level of control diminished to the point where Wolf took over completely and the team became Walter Wolf Racing. Williams then formed a new team, Williams Grand Prix Engineering (now known as WilliamsF1) with Patrick Head, originally running a customer March before building their own cars starting with the Williams FW06. Here is a link to the most recent discussion on the matter. DH85868993 (talk) 02:11, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Williams F1 

message: Should we have a redirect from Wolf-Williams Racing to Frank Williams Racing Cars. it is the same team that changed its name? 92.21.248.44 (talk) 17:26, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: A re-direct already exists. Eagleash (talk) 17:33, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: To clarify, it didn't when the IP editor posed the question, but it does now. DH85868993 (talk) 20:09, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: A re-direct existed from Wolf Williams without the 'racing' (to a section which was subsequently renamed). A re-direct from Wolf Williams Racing was recently requested and declined due to the pre-existing one and the probability that an article which failed notability would be created from it as the the previous Wolf Williams draft did. (Which was deleted as copy-vio). Eagleash (talk) 22:12, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Wolf-Williams Racing
Talk:Pink Lincolns

message: Would this band be appropriately described as pop punk in its association with Screeching Weasel, and the chicago scene? Are there a better or additional stylistic qualifiers to describe the Pink Lincolns? Discuss. Xsxex 22:08, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Host-based intrusion detection system

message: *This page has lots of claims that are invalid (operation of HIDS, etc).
**Some of this could end up well on a HIPS page.
***This article is made of fail, in need of a complete re-write. Like this line "(Crackers are a competitive bunch...) Again, one can detect (and learn from) such changes."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.253.137.5 (talk) 09:57, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

message: militating?  Surely there is a better word to use in that sentence in the section on Protecting the HIDS.  It's not clear what that sentence even means.  Oswald Glinkmeyer (talk) 21:52, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Protecting the HIDS

message: Article is absent of useful (let alone, notable) references.  Quality of content is lacking.  For example, under section 1.3, "Protecting the HIDS" text reads, "A HIDS will usually go to great lengths to prevent the object-database,..."  This is inappropriate at best.  Technically, it is simply inaccurate.  Securing resources maintained by the HID is a useful subject since a failure to do so can make it rather useless -- although not necessarily in any way that differs from a failure to protect everything else, suitably.   A HIDS, really is a program or script. It is not a "system".  It monitors its host in order to issue alerts -- if configured to do so.  It is neither alive, nor intelligent so doesn't do any sort of "protection".  Protecting files and other resources is a joint responsibility shared by the Operating System and the system admin.
Kernel.package (talk) 04:59, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article seems useful albeit not well written 

message: To me it seems that the two links in the article just links to commercial products and don't add to the value of the article. Therefor seem very similar to ads. It would make more sense to put those two products into their own articles. In this article they could be mentioned as examples for commercial HIDSs. Would that make sense?--Athaba (talk) 12:04, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of links 

message: I made a few minor tweaks to the lead prose to remove the need for parenthesis. Much of what a HIDS does is based on how it is configured. I also added an additional reference (Vacca) further down the page that can potentially be used for some other sections. I'll try to do a little more work on this stub when I get a chance. DoctorG  (talk) 21:09, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor cleanup
Talk:Marcel Bonin

message: The birth year is false: http://ourhistory.canadiens.com/player/Marcel-Bonin
--Danielvis08 (talk) 11:50, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Mike McPhee

message: I removed the link to McPhee's personal webpage from the text of the article because it constitutes advertising for his financial advisor practice. The link in the list of links below is still in place.   Valsorim (talk) 17:38, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personal Webpage 
Talk:Xfinity Center (Mansfield, Massachusetts)

message: I think this section needs to be removed. --Usgnus 22:25, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable musical performances

message: As of July 2014, the former Comcast Center in College Park, Maryland officially became XFINITY Center — leaving two venues with the same name. Currently, the Xfinity Center link refers straight to this page, and a redirect page exists at Xfinity Center (Mansfield, Massachusetts) to this page.
Ideally, this page should be moved to Xfinity Center (Mansfield, Massachusetts) so that this page can become a disambiguation page for the two venues, as well as any other Comcast/XFINITY-branded arenas that currently or may exist due to corporate rebranding. Markar14 (talk) 20:59, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request move to XFINITY Center (Mansfield, Massachusetts)
Talk:Black history

message: *I am not concerned enough about it to make a big deal of it, but I think it is a little inappropriate to hijack the Black History link with a redirect to American Black History.  Surely there should be a disambiguation link?  I was trying to link in to the first free Black church in the New World (which was in the Caribbean) but obviously I can't use a link that pushes people to a different geographical area entirely. Legis 22:26, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

message: Please go to different countries and start asking about history cause this is just you brains washing the public 41.113.1.109 (talk) 11:52, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  African history was not the way you say it is
Talk:Boris the Sprinkler

message: When did BtS break up? It says they are defunct on their myspace profile. Xsxex 22:29, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A brief mention that I put out two of Boris the Sprinkler's multitude of 7" records on my label, Mutant Pop Records (defunct since 2008). —Tim Davenport /// Carrite (talk) 03:35, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Pro-forma COI declaration
Talk:George Prodgers

message: It's been a while since I've done research on the Tigers, but from what I recall he never did play in a game during this season.  I'm fairly certain that I have records of all of the games the Tigers played and nowhere is he listed on the line ups.  174.88.18.212 (talk) 22:38, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  1924-25 Game
Category talk:TGFβ domain

message: There is a link to Development on this page that is linking to a disambiguation page. I'm not sure which (if any) of the more specific pages on types of development would be a better link in this context, particularly since morphogenesis is already a link. 
Similarly, there is a link to Growth which needs to be refined, as it also points to a disambiguation page. Since this could refer to maturation or cell growth, for example, the meaning needs to be clarified.
Could someone please review the choices available and either re-direct the links or delete them? Thanks.—Chidom talk  22:36, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation
Talk:Crash-only software

message: Ha ha. Is Windows XP intended to be crash-only software though?
:As long as data isn't being written, and the user doesn't want to save any OS changes, Windows doesn't need to be 'shut down.' Otherwise, Windows is NOT intended to be crash-only. Hypothetically if it was, and settings are saved before shut-down, a person could save system-ruining settings without the OS waiting to make sure it survived. This will likely never be the case, as large non-volitile buffer hard drives will allow extremely fast Windows Vista shut down and start up times however, as they can quickly flash the data to the buffer and power down. 67.183.81.226 00:41, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Senda Berenson Abbott

message: Any source to support this?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by E.Polti (talk • contribs) 10:09, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "great-great-aunt of Berry Berenson and Marisa Berenson" 

message: * THE NATIONAL JEWISH SPORTS HALL OF FAME AND MUSEUM --SPhilbrick(Talk) 17:13, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  To-do 

message: Hi, I cleaned up the article's writing and reassessed the importance. I'm wordy and a meh copywriter though so it could probably use another run. Cheers originalmesshow u doin that busta rhyme? 02:07, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  june 2018 

message: Where is the information about her original last name coming from? I really doubt it. The point is that this last name never existed in the Russian Empire, be that among Poles or Jews. All you can find in Google with the word "Valvrojenski" is about Senda and her brother Bernhard, and that may have come from a single (and potentially wrong) source. A good evidence might be an arrival record in Castle Garden, but there is no record with such a last name.
Игорь Гинзбург (talk) 02:45, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  The original last name
Talk:Marisa Berenson

message: The unsourced statement that MB is "known more for her beauty than her acting ability" strikes me as a glaring violation of WP:NPOV. I am editing the article accordingly. Stammer 10:45, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: this section seems to focus way too much on her (illustrious) ancestors and not much on her. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.151.231.225 (talk • contribs) 15:53, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Early life

message: Marisa appeared on the cover of American Vogue 1 Sep 1965 (possibly her first) and remarkably on successive covers of Amercan Vogue 1 Oct 1965 and 15 Oct 1965 Adamsez (talk) 07:12, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vogue cover appearances 
Talk:Grapefruit Islands

message: The name of the page is "The 7 Grapefruit Islands." The article itself starts with "The Seven Grapefruit Islands." Excluding Wikipedia and Answers.com (which uses Wikipedia), I could not find reputable sources where "seven" or "7" is part of the name. I found both used as adjectives. In , the name is used in quotes, and "seven" is an adjective kept outside. In , "seven" is uncapitalized. I propose to move this article to Grapefruit Islands. -- Win777 22:39, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Correct title
Talk:Susan Bysiewicz

message: Where is the bit about her lying about Scalettar's record?--71.80.120.74 (talk) 12:16, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Looks like Susan is cleaning up her own record 

message: As one of the founders of the New Haven road race in 1978 I have a feel for what your brother is going through. I wish a speedy recovery. Dr Fred Caminear   UConn ‘57 69.113.74.161 (talk) 23:10, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brother
Talk:Joseph Kessel

message: Didn't dare to edit the article itself, but I always heared that Joseph Kessel was a fighter pilot during world war I81.245.186.215 23:31, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Wir geben 'ne Party

message: Most of the lyrics were chosen so they may sound like English to someone who doesn't pay attention to what they're actually singing. As for the chorus: The way they sing it is acoustically much closer to "We're givin' a party" than to "Wir geben 'ne Party". Back then, I hated that and condemned it as cheating. Today I rather tend to think it's clever, but that's after I lost most of my respect for that show. --84.177.26.32 (talk) 17:17, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not just anglicisms
Talk:Prime Minister of Cuba

message: Batista doesn't appear in the list of prime ministers. -- Beardo 22:55, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Batista

message: I am not really sure that the description as de facto PM in the Guardian warrants inclusion here.  It is just one quote, and doesn't really reflect reality - he doesn't have enough power for that.  (Closer analogy would be finance minister or (in England) Chancellor of the Exchequer.) -- Beardo 23:03, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I spotted it and thought it worth a mention. It is relevant to Lage's page - but perhaps not here and maybe you're right. Secretary of the council of ministers is a rather strange role - but remember that the Chancellor of the Exchequer is traditionally the deputy Prime Minister in Britain (forget the role created for Prescott). --Zleitzen 23:08, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Britain is different because the head of state is separate, and has their own system of succession - though there have been eight deputy prime ministers since 1942. -- Beardo 23:23, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lage 

message: The article List of Prime Ministers of Cuba includes the presidents of the Council of Ministers - but here shows vacant between 1976 and 2019. -- Beardo (talk) 04:31, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of Prime Ministers 
Talk:Adam Gottlob Moltke

message: This article is listed on the NPOV backlog. Minor tet edits. Since the NPOV tag was placed without discussion, and there's no discussion suggesting disagreement, the tag is removed. If you disagree with this, please re-tag the disputed section with  (or the article with ) and post to Talk. Also consider improving the article yourself. -- Steve Hart 22:58, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV cleanup
Talk:Truggy

message: Removed 4-wheel-drive feature of truggies. Pat Herbst's truggy, arguably the "original" truggy, is only 2 wheel drive. However, I added that truggies be defined as having front-mounted engines. Buggies are classically rear- or mid-engined, but truggies, being based on truck designs, are (I think) all front-engined. As I see it, a truggy is basically an open-wheel truck.--5th earth 22:58, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Some basic problems I see with this article: 
* The article is titled "truggy" but the text refers to caruggy, a much less common term.  Are they same, different?  Is one term obsolete?  Not explained. 
* The article starts off by saying: "Some people[who?] think that the caruggy nomenclature is derived from using a car frame as the basis for the vehicle, whereas a "buggy" would have started from the chassis of a Volkswagen Bug." 
Encyclopedia style means explaining the topic as simply and clearly as possible.  Starting the article with what confused people think, but are wrong about, is not good. 
* It appears that the article is being used to promote a person and his business. "Tim Lawrence (TLR Performance Fabrication) of El Cajon" who has managed to paste this all over the place, but he is not the original creator of the Truggy. THIS IS CLEARLY A VIOLATION OF WIKIPEDIA RULES! 
*  Usually the first Truggy is considered to be the Terrible Herbst Truggy.  A Google Search on "Terrible Herbst Truggy" will return pages of videos, article from off-road web sites, and reprints of magazine articles going back years. 
*  There are no references for the article. 
THIS ARTICLE EITHER NEEDS TO BE RE-WRITTEN OR DELETED. 
ZeroXero (talk) 03:42, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article needs a lot of work.