lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Neighbor

message: Should this have the name changed because I thought that wikipedia convention was to use british spellings unless the article in question is strictly american? -Vcelloho 19:13, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Theres another article with the british english spelling so it would be difficult to change. Pathfinder2006 (talk) 11:11, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Waaaay after the fact, but for anyone interested, the Wikipedia guideline on English spelling variations is at MOS:ENGVAR Hoof Hearted (talk) 21:11, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Illinois's 15th congressional district

message: I like to know in Southeastern Illinois if we people low income people and people on SSI is going to get a stimulus check and how much if you can help me I'd appreciate it thank you 76.11.169.153 (talk) 07:56, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stimulus check
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Kid lethal

message: one again I just added MORE sources.
Jasin Sane/Kid Lethal is a competitive wrestler in NAW.  He has been recognized in the Florda Indie League.  If, there is a way you can prove this wrong, without a doubt that this person does not exist then, and only then, can i see that it is a fair delete.(Lack of search results on google or any other search engine do not count) 
Drklabyrinth 22:56, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:List of monarchs of Wessex

message: The article says, "This is a list of monarchs of Wessex until 924. For later monarchs, see the List of monarchs in the British Isles." The page linked to is useless for the non-expert. It has sixteen links to kingdoms any one of which might be the successor kingdom to Wessex. Was Wessex conquered in 924? Did it cease to exist? Or did it conquer Mercia and become England? Please if you know put a link to the list of kings who succeeded Æthelstan.
I found what appears to me to be the correct link. Please help by checking my work. Thanks,
Nick Beeson (talk) 15:15, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who is next?

message: The third column, containing what are supposedly Latin and Old English titles of the various kings, is totally unreferenced and, on its face, extremely dubious. The spellings are sometimes unlikely, the grammar impossible, and the Old English execrable (ðe is not Old English for "the"; great is not Old English for "great" in terms of fame but rather "thick, coarse," and Alfred did not receive this epithet until centuries after his death). I can only assume that the editor (John Armagh) who added this column simply made most or all of these titles up, perhaps based on a tiny handful of legitimate titles. In any case, this entire thing needs to be redone, based on *actual* data (e.g., coins, inscriptions, documents) which is sourced and cited. RandomCritic (talk) 21:51, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Third column 

message: Could we please pages for legendary kings that came before Cerdic of Wessex?
--Figfires (talk) 21:18, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: We could refer readers to the article mentioned by Dimadick, Anglo-Saxon royal genealogies, for information on legendary kings. Dudley Miles (talk) 10:20, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: However.... That article doesnt contain all of the names that are listed above nor does it state they are legendary kings/provides information about them.  --Figfires (talk) 22:10, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: You bring up a great point, especially in light of Iceland's proliferations here on Wikipedia! I am searching into it however if you hadn't already seen there is a link to the Anglo-Saxon royal genealogies as well as List of legendary kings of Britain pages in the See also section of the current article's main page (List of monarchs of Wessex). Best, Altanner1991 (talk) 09:17, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legendary Kings 

message: Idk if this was discussed but why aren't the monarchs of Wessex, England, and Britain on the same page? GamerKlim9716 (talk) 13:51, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging 3 Pages
Talk:Ceol of Wessex

message: The final sentence says, "It is possible that Maqui Coline is linked to Coel, suggesting a rival  family to that of Ceawlin." Should this read linked to Ceol, or is the idea actually to link him to Coel Hen in the Celtic North? Paul S (talk) 21:12, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't have access to the Antiquaries Journal, but "Coel" looks to me to be a simple typo, since Ceol is the subject of the article and "Coel" would create a need to make reference to the "Celtic North", which the article doesn't as it stands. So I've changed "Coel" to "Ceol".. Nortonius (talk) 06:05, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ceol/Coel 

message: Good afternoon, Dudley: I noticed that Ceolwulf & Cynegils had been already linked, however not in this paragraph; I considered it easier on the eye and more comfortable for the reader to add the links to the breakdown so that all persons mentioned in this breakdown would have the same “status”; after all, it is the general public and not the “scholars” that read the Wikipedia; nevertheless, if you are of a different opinion, I will respect it; (BTW: Queen Seaxburh was not a descendant of Ceol and not a member of his sub-house, if any, as she was a member of the House of Wessex “only” by marriage); all the best--Jan Hejkrlík (talk) 12:58, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links added/removed 
Talk:Tyler Legacy High School

message: We've had some problems lately with someone adding a porn star to the Alumni section. Notable alumni of Robert E. Lee high school must be properly referenced. If there is an adult film star (or anyone else) who is a Lee grad, that person must be notable, and have proper documentation. Snowfire51 17:30, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I hope we DO have a properly referenced porn star as alumnus. That would be cool.  I just added notable alumni John E. Barrett and John R. Muse who I regret are not porn stars. Vidamasvida (talk) 01:21, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable Alumni 

message: This school has a negative 0.1% Native American population?Dkkicks (talk) 06:36, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  -1?
Talk:Le Banquier

message: How about explaining how the game is played instead of mentionning that it's the same as the american game?
--Smumdax 21:38, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need explanations... 
Talk:Bumper Stumpers

message: But Bumper Stumpers will return to GameTV on Feb 3.
and here's the source:
https://www.igametv.com/shows/1278/
and fail to see how it's unsourced Digifan23 (talk) 17:24, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: is unsourced, and the link in  posted February 3 did not originally include scheduling details for February 4. WP:BURDEN of proof is for editors to include sources when adding info. Stop making unsourced edits and they'll stop being reverted for being unsourced. AldezD (talk) 02:51, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  Is it perhaps the nomenclature being used for that reference that is at issue?  It appears the edit being made is in document reruns are starting back up and the editor is using an online TV guide as evidence of this fact.  While it's debatable if this edit even should be included, can we agree that the reference does support reruns are starting again on certain networks airuditious (talk) 03:08, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  This link is a dynamic target and will change based upon the day it is accessed. It does not meet WP:V. A source that meets guidelines needs to be included with the edit adding information. AldezD (talk) 03:16, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

text:  "Dynamic link" is all that was need to clarify this issue.  As such, completely agreed - this does not qualify as a RS. airuditious (talk) 03:17, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bumper Stumpers returns to GameTV
Talk:Romance of the Three Kingdoms IV: Wall of Fire

message: There appears to have been an edit back in 2017 that attempted to remove the Dreamcast version, followed by a revert stating that there is a cover scan on GameFAQs.  I don't see this cover scan, or any game in the series other than Romance 6 in Koei's releases for the Dreamcast on GameFAQshttps://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/company/2012-koei?platform=67&year=0®ion=0&devpub=0.  Given that the listed April 2000 release date would be four years after any other version of Romance 4 and exactly matches the release date of Romance 6, I believe this information was mistakenly included due to confusion with Roman numerals and that there is no Dreamcast version of Romance 4.  GauRocks (talk) 06:21, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Dreamcast Version
Talk:Séraphine Louis

message: Where are they? In a normal Encyclopaedia one would expect to see examples of the artists work - why not here? A quick search for images reveals many, how would one go about putting them here?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.170.87.20 (talk) 08:46, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Examples of her art 

message: I have corrected practically every instance of "Séraphine" to "Louis" in this article per the WP:SURNAME guideline, which recommends referring the the article's subject (actually, any person mentioned in any article) by his or her surname alone after the first statement of the subject's full name. This article had consistently done the opposite before my corrections, referring to her throughout as "Séraphine".
That guideline allows some exceptions, as when doing so would introduce ambiguity, as it would in the article on The Andrews Sisters; or when the person is universally known by given name alone, like Cher. Although in many contexts this subject is called by her given name alone (as in the common appellation "Séraphine de Senlis" and in the movie about her, whose title is simply Séraphine), at least two arguments strongly support following the surname-only guideline for this article:
# The article's title gives her full name, not just "Séraphine" (again, compare Cher).
# The subject typically signed her paintings "S. Louis", as the article itself states, indicating that she identified strongly with her surname.
I have also preserved 's for the genitive case, changing Séraphine's to Louis's rather than the Louis' some editors prefer. The final s in Louis is not pronounced in French or by most English speakers when pronouncing the name in a French context (as in "king Louis XIV" or even in name of the American city Louisville), and therefore the s after the apostrophe is always pronouncedeven by most English speakers when they do pronounce the final s in Louis.
—Jim10701 (talk) 14:15, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  correcting "Séraphine" to "Louis" 
Talk:Siegburg/Bonn station

message: Ich habe keine Ahnung, wie ich den Autor dieses Artikels kontaktieren soll, wenn ich nur auf diese Projekt-Seite geleitet werde, deshalb versuche ich es auf diesem Weg. Mir ist in diesem Artikel ein Fehler aufgefallen, konnte ihn aber nicht beheben, da ich die entsprechende Stelle im Skript nirgends finden kann. Es geht um die Stelle in der Infotabelle oben rechts. Dort steht unter der Linie 66 der Zusatz "Telekom-Express", welcher seit mehreren Jahren nicht mehr zutreffend ist. Die Telekom macht seit einiger Zeit keine Werbung mehr auf den Zügen und somit ist auch der Namenszusatz entfallen. Wie gesagt, ich konnte die Stelle nicht finden, sonst hätte ich die Änderung selber vorgeschlagen. Tobilinco (talk) 12:11, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed, thanks for pointing out that line 66 is no longer the "Telekom-Express".--Grahame (talk) 13:14, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: "Telekom-Express"
Talk:Lavoisier Group

message: I keep running into this.  The only reason for a lot of the editing on this item and for its deletion is the BIAS OF WIKI ADMIN's.  But don't worry, reality will reign in a year or two.  The quality of this article is vastly higher than the junk I've been wiped from.  Whatever.  Wiki is presently a vassal of a political movement. (Itsonlysteam (talk) 03:42, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WIKI BIAS 

message: I will show more courtesy than the person who has proposed this article for speedy deletion and will discuss the reasons why I object.
Speedy Deletion Request of this article, which I have created, has been requested by User:FireWeed after a debate between us about whether Intelligent Design is, or is not, junk science (please see Talk:Junk science and the corresponding times of his/her contributions).
This user has also repetedly added notability and POV tags to the article without providing reasons.
The Lavoisier Group is a relevant think tank in Australia about the uncertainties that may underpin the Kyoto Protocol. It also discusses the economic consequences that global warming public policies may have on Australia.
A Google search of The Lavoisier Group produces enough occurences to confirm its notability.
Finally, this article is still in its early stages and will in time contribute links to the very active Wiki pages about global warming and the surrounding controversy. --Childhood's End 21:20, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  SDR 

message: Please note that, by a decision of the Wikipedia community, this article and others relating to climate change (broadly construed) has been placed under article probation. Editors making disruptive edits may be blocked temporarily from editing the encyclopedia, or subject to other administrative remedies, according to standards that may be higher than elsewhere on Wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia:General sanctions/Climate change probation for full information and to review the decision. -- ChrisO (talk) 13:37, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Article probation

message: I have in effect reverted http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lavoisier_Group&diff=229249312&oldid=221771784 by user 121.209.234.98, who seems to have misinterpreted the Sydney Morning Herald words "website with links" to mean "Lavoisier Group has links". I have changed the section title "Current Activities" since there are no current activities (the organisation's website says the last change was on 20 May 2011). I have removed a paragraph which said that the organisation continues to hold annual conferences (no evidence), and that the Lavoisier Group promotes the theories of Landscheidt -- actually the cited source is Bob Foster not the Lavoisier Group, and Mr Foster begins by saying "this submission (and my earlier submission to the References Committee) is made in my private capacity". Peter Gulutzan (talk) 14:47, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed two statements which didn't correspond to cited sources
Talk:Mediocre American Man Trilogy

message: This would be best merged with the main Anchorman article, possibly until more info surfaces --leopheard 10:09, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge? 

message: This article should be renamed to Mediocre American Man (film series) to bring it inline with the naming convention pertaining to film series. Let's discuss. - LA @ 10:42, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The article for the third movie has been deleted three times due to a lack of sources, and an unsigned comment above seems to agree with this. It's certainly not a trilogy in that case; but I think this would be better off prodded or sent to AfD. Most of the contents appear to be original research. Dekimasuよ! 07:48, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That article has been deleted, sure, but hasn't Ferrell mentioned his intentions for a trilogy in interviews? Isn't that where the name for the "trilogy" came from?--Tim Thomason 20:29, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: Surely Semi-Pro is the third installment in the trilogy... 134.36.19.139 (talk)
Actually it isn't. Will Ferral did not classify it as such. And besides, if it was, it's 
title would be Semi Pro: The Tale of Jackie Moon. And besides, the Booby Trap movie is the
third movie. Anonomyus 8:27, 19 March 2008
:There is no Booby Trap movie.  Phoenix1304 (talk) 18:21, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Semi-Pro

message: There should be mention of the third movie of this trilogy, or mention that there has been no announcement of the third movie.  Davewho2 (talk) 21:08, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Third movie
Talk:Romance of the Three Kingdoms VIII

message: ==Untitled==
I deleted the link to MobyGames because the page has only very brief info about this game. Everyone can quickly create such a brief page and get Wikipedia to link to their page. Ancos (talk) 07:34, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links 

message: I deleted the link to MobyGames because the page has only very brief info about this game. Everyone can quickly create such a brief page and get Wikipedia to link to their page. Ancos (talk) 07:34, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tirana District

message: Add #Move or #Keep in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation (with further comment in the "Simple tests" section), then sign your opinion with ~~~~
====Move to Tirana District====
#Move, as nominator. - Evv 21:23, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Survey 

message: #Move, as nominator. - Evv 21:23, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Move to [[Tirana District]]

message: Google Print test:
* Searching for "Tirana District": 33 books in English.
* Searching for "Tiranë District": 0 books.
* Searching for "Tirane District": 3 books in English.
* Searching for "District of Tirana": 11 books in English.
* Searching for "District of Tiranë": 1 book in English.
* Searching for "District of Tirane": 1 book in English.
Google Scholar test:
* Searching for "Tirana District": 43 results in English.
* Searching for "Tiranë District": 3 results in English.
* Searching for "Tirane District": 3 results in English.
* Searching for "District of Tirana": 14 results in English.
* Searching for "District of Tiranë": 1 result in English.
* Searching for "District of Tirane": 0 results.
Amazon.com test:
* Searching for "Tirana District": 9 books in English.
* Searching for "Tiranë District": 1 book in English.
* Searching for "Tirane District": 0 books.
* Searching for "District of Tirana": 10 books in English.
* Searching for "District of Tiranë" or "District of Tirane": 0 books.
The New York Times:
* Searching for "Tirana District": 2 results.
* Searching for "Tiranë District" or "Tirane District": 0 results.
* Searching for "District of Tirana": 1 result.
* Searching for "District of Tiranë" or "District of Tirane": 0 results.
Best regards, Evv 21:23, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Simple tests
Talk:Tirana County

message: Google Print test:
* Searching for "Tirana County", "Tiranë County" or "Tirane County": 0 books.
* Searching for "County of Tirana", "County of Tiranë" or "County of Tirane": 0 books.
Google Scholar test:
* Searching for "Tirana County", "Tiranë County" or "Tirane County": 0 results.
* Searching for "County of Tirana", "County of Tiranë" or "County of Tirane": 0 results.
Google searches:
* Searching for "Tirana County" -Wikipedia -wiki -Tirane -Tiranë: 5 results in English.
* Searching for "Tiranë County" -Wikipedia -wiki -Tirane -Tirana: 1 result in English (and Wikipedia mirrors).
* Searching for "Tirane County" -Wikipedia -wiki -Tirana -Tiranë: 1 result in English.
* Searching for "County of Tirana" -Wikipedia -wiki -Tirane -Tiranë: 4 results in English.
* Searching for "County of Tiranë" -Wikipedia -wiki -Tirane -Tirana: 1 result in English.
* Searching for "County of Tirane" -Wikipedia -wiki -Tirana -Tiranë: 0 results.
Best regards, Evv 21:23, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Simple tests
Talk:Aztag

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Bensci54 (talk) 17:08, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Aztag (daily) →  – Unnecessary disambiguator. --Երևանցի talk 15:58, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 3 November 2023
Talk:Cleaner (2007 film)

message: I'm not sure but the sources (imdb,Yahoo) points the film's date to 2007, but here it says 2008... Anyone?
--KelvinHOWiknerd(talk) 17:03, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I saw this movie at the Toronto International Film Festival in the fall of '07. IMHO it's a piece of junk, maybe it didn't get picked up for distribution? I wouldn't be surprised if it remains unreleased, it's just a mediocre, clicheed whodunnit.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Santegeezhe (talk • contribs) 18:14, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  2008/2007 

message: Didn't know sheep watch films...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.105.153.58 (talk) 20:16, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Kwiki (talk) 20:17, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The film was universally panned by critics and sheep 

message: Most movies have a plot summary.  Why doesn't this one? 207.216.212.126 (talk) 05:04, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Umm... what's the plot?
Talk:Oklahoma Housing Finance Agency

message: Please join us on 13 December 2020, 12:00-14:00 EST, as we update and improve articles in Wikipedia related to housing in the United States of America. Sign up here. -- M2545 (talk) 10:26, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Invitation to [[Wikipedia:Meetup/US_housing/December_2020|US Housing Edit-a-thon]]
Talk:Black Fox Nuclear Power Plant

message: Should it be added to :Category:unfinished nuclear reactors, or didn't it even get as far as site works starting? Andrewa 07:28, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: How far did this project get
Talk:Climate canary

message: Relocated from Wikipedia:Suspected_copyright_violations by Butseriouslyfolks 21:30, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The source of the text is not www.footballliving.com/moreinfo/Verb, however, the source is actually mentioned in the text. And I do not consider this text as copyrighted, so there is no violation. Anyway, if you have another opinion, just change the text accordingly. --Roland Word 15:00, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Stuff is generally considered copyrighted unless it can be proven that public domain applies or that there's a specific statement releasing copyright. It's really best to just write articles in your own words. But we don't usually do anything when it's just a pretty basic, generic 1-sentence definition that's a copyvio, although it is best to say it was taken directly from some source. --W.marsh 15:15, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Try to write articles in your own words citing a reference. While we are not going to do anything with this entry right now, it is better if next time you create them with what you understand and not what thirds have said. -- ReyBrujo 17:36, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot 03:30, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-02-1 Automated pywikipediabot message
Talk:Mr and Mrs (TV series)

message: Could anyone tell me which celebrities will be at the 27/04/2009, 5:45pm recording? --█▄█▄█  █▄█▄█  █▄▄ 11:12, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recording, 27/04/2009 

message: It would be a great improvement to this article if the article told us what contestants had to do on the programme. As far as I can remember, it was a contest to see how well contestant's answers to questions would match up with answers from their spouses. Vorbee (talk) 19:47, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: What contestants did on the programme
Talk:Mid-Continent Tower

message: I have removed the claim that the Cosden Building was Tulsa's first skyscraper because the statement had no citation. Depending on one's definition of skyscraper, at least two other buildings (Hotel Tulsa and the Petroleum Building) could also make such a claim. Bruin2 (talk) 15:26, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: First skyscraper claim

message: This article meets the project guidelines for Start classification. Bruin2 (talk) 14:31, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Page classification