Talk:Eric Schneiderman

message: * http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/02/eric-schneiderman-donald-trump-new-york-214734
czar 21:16, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Eric Schneiderman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110902103707/http://www.ag.ny.gov/about.html to http://www.ag.ny.gov/about.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:44, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: There seems to  oversight in that the category 'Category:Jewish American attorneys' is conspicuously missing  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:3970:EDA0:AD02:9518:4703:5016 (talk) 02:38, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: We already have :Category:Jewish American politicians and :Category:Lawyers from New York City, so I'm not quite sure why :Category:Jewish American attorneys is necessary. power~enwiki (π, ν) 03:31, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Why do categories exist? To catalogue and make searchable through a review of the category.  Categories are discrete, searchable databases and ought to be independent of each other, not a Cliff Notes version of the article, or nah?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:3970:EDA0:B96B:31F4:D988:B3A0 (talk) 03:59, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested Category addition 

message: So this ought to be taken out, right? Makes the whole thing seem terribly slanted. 192.160.131.22 (talk) 21:38, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. I see it was already removed by User:Sandstein. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:25, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "despite having no evidence 

message: When will the article take note of this "Ex: Schneiderman called me ‘brown slave,’ slapped me until I called him ‘Master’"
https://nypost.com/2018/05/07/ex-schneiderman-called-me-his-brown-slave-would-slap-me-until-i-called-him-master/ --105.8.1.208 (talk) 22:11, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Brown Slave" 

message: Chris troutman deleted these eleven words in the section about the 2010 election:
He denied being involved in a hit and run in July.
This got deleted even though it showed up in the The New York Times.  Oh well, showing up in the «newspaper of record» as well as all other major Big Apple newspapers and magazines about a New York State Senator who represented Manhattan and the Bronx is apparently now WP:UNDUE?
Obviously, this has become now relevant again insofar as Crain's New York Business (cited above), NY1, City Journal have again raised the issue now, in 2018, eight years later.  But hey, maybe we ought to save 11 words of server space! XavierItzm (talk) 22:33, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The issue is not if the incident were true or it was in a reliable source. The issue is that you're giving it undue coverage. I'm not tying to protect the subject but the subject has been a target of vandalism. Suffice to say that I have no respect for your edit history. Chasing "news" is always a bad idea. Chris Troutman (talk) 23:41, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content deleted by Chris troutman about Schneiderman's 2010 hit and run being questioned by the media in 2018