lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Les Hill

message: Some suggestions for improvement as the article is expanded:
*Appropriate infobox should be added 
*Photograph should be added from a source with a free license 
*Basic biographical information required
*Article needs expanding and should emphasise reasons for notability of subject
*After expansion, article should be divided into appropriate subheadings
*References should be added, preferably in the inline format  
*External link present which could be used to expand article
Espresso Addict 20:04, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Review comments

message: He's also in the pacific by Steen spielberg etc. He played a captain on the pendington??? marine base. 81.68.255.36 (talk) 21:07, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[The pacific]]
Talk:Bacon grease

message: I think someone should comment that just because bacon grease has lots of saturated fats, it is not bad for you.  Question: does bacon grease have trans-fats?
No, it doesn't contain any trans-fats. Bacon grease and lard are a hell of a lot healthier (and tastier) than Crisco, soybean oil, or any other hydrogenated poison.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.95.233.49 (talk) 07:19, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Fat IS nutrition. It's pure food energy, as is sugar. If something doesn't have either carbohydrate or fat you're not going to get any food energy out of it, so I guess 'nutrition' must have a different meaning than I'm used to?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.72.21.221 (talk) 00:30, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  No nutritional value aside from the lipids? 

message: This article says 4g of bacon grease has 38 calories, but even if it's pure fat, the numbers must be off, since pure fat has 9 calories per gram, and \frac{9 \mbox{ kcal}}{\mbox{g}} \times 4 \mbox{ g}=36 \mbox{ kcal}.  (Shouldn't we find a better source—one that doesn't have obviously incorrect numbers?)  What gives?  dcandeto (talk) 19:20, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fuzzy math
Talk:Muriel Pavlow

message: The caption says the photo of Muriel Pavlow is from 'Reach for the Sky'. Are we sure? Also, the caption associated with the photo link says that she is talking to someone when on the stage. There seems to be some sort of uniform and Bader's wife was not in the WRAF - at least according to the film. Longfinal (talk) 14:40, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right. The image details give the correct info. I've corrected the caption. Masato.harada (talk) 17:39, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The photo
Talk:Reno Wilson

message: On this article, it says he was born on October 20. But other places list his date of birth as January 20. So... which is correct? Shadoman (talk) 00:14, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthdate... 

message: --  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:908:191:5FA0:D9FB:C81D:7D59:49E1 (talk) 08:38, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  he sang the BONNIE TYLER Song TOTAL ECLIPSE OF MY HEART on MIKE AND MOLLY  

message: If his professional name is Reno, why is he being referred to as Roy?  He gets to choose his name.  If he doesn't, then Bob Dylan should be called Robert Zimmerman.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.38.185.65 (talk) 07:09, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  First name:  Roy or Reno?
Talk:Delamination

message: AVOID BETWEEN TWO HARDERN SURFACE
Bright Sound?
The article refers to a "bright" sound.  What is a bright sound?  Is the use of "bright" to desribe this part of normal composite vocabulary? 
I've never heard of it....198.54.202.94 (talk) 12:29, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article states that delamination is an insidious failure. Delamination is a common failure in surfboards, which are made from composite materials (usually fiberglass). It's very visible on the surface of the board when it happens so I question the validity of the statement. It may be true in heavy duty construction composites where the layers are thicker, but in small equipment with thin composites you would see and feel delamination very quickly. 192.55.54.38 (talk) 03:14, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Insidious failure? 

message: I am editing this page as a project for a graduate class in fracture mechanics. Changes I made are on my sandbox. If anyone has objections please contact me. 
StevenJYang (talk) 15:39, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major Edits to Page
Talk:Tallinna Linnatranspordi AS

message: I've Merged everything from List of tram and trolleybus routes in Tallinn per the AFD - The AFD was closed as Keep but since closer stated anyone could Boldly merge I did just that - I apologize if it came across as misleading as it certainly wasn't my intention,
Cheers, –Davey2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 01:00, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The results of the AFD did not mandate the merge - the results were Keep. The non-admin closure stated "A merge discussion can take place on the article's talk page, or someone can WP:BOLDly merge.". You chose to do the latter. This may be may be reverted by any editor, which would require discussion and consensus to do again. JoeSperrazza (talk) 01:56, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes but the closer stated anyone could boldy merge which I decided to do, Ah yeah it wasn't my intention to mislead thereAlso there shouldn't be an issue as everything on that page is on the parent article so thus fills up that parent article, Cheers, –Davey2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 02:06, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

text: *I've reverted as assumed no one had an issue. –Davey2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 02:22, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: *Tallinna Linnatranspordi AS - current article title
** - redirect from alternative name (the current title is used more commonly so let's not move it)
** - disambiguation page
** - Estonian name for TTTK
** - English name for TTTK, that redirect is in categories that apply only to TTTK and not to TLT (per Wikipedia:Categorizing redirects)
** - redirect from initialism
** - English name for TAK, that redirect is in categories that apply only to TAK and not TLT
** - Estonian name for TAK
** - disambiguation page
Doing this I'm assuming we're okay with having an article for TLT and redirecting the former two companies here.
Also the company seems to go by its Estonian name, I have not seen an English version of it. 
Also I'm having a bit of trouble with editing the interwiki links. I tried to edit the links on wikidata but I'm a n00b there and I couldn't figure it out. — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 13:39, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Forgot to mention, the Wikidata problem has been sorted. — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 09:22, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirects and such
Talk:Cryptography newsgroups

message: For the past month or so (maybe longer), sci.crypt has been been bombarded with spam.  So much so that it is, for all practical purposes, unusable.  Google searches suggest that it's been spammed on and off, heavily, since last year.  Other searches implicate Hipcrime as the software package being used.
Anyway, should this be mentioned in the article?  I've never seen so much spam in a newsgroup, however, I also don't normally subscribe to newsgroups for very long periods of time TerraFrost 06:57, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  spamming on sci.crypt
Talk:Gal On

message: I took the liberty of wikifying this page. Please feel free to edit and/or correct an mistakes as you see fit. Notecardforfree 07:06, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Your work if very good and appreciated. It was necessary to add the template because, based on spot checks, it appears that the only source is the Kibbutz itself. Also a problem for WP:COI and see also: Wikipedia:Independent sources. Thanks! HG | Talk 03:49, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You are correct - my only source is the Kibbutz Gal On website. However, I completely rewrote all the information in my own words, which I do not believe to be plagiarism. I also do not believe this to be a conflict of interest, as the information placed on their website was placed by the kibbutz historian. In response to your concerns, I have added a reference section to the article, in which I included a link to the Kibbutz’s history. Is this sufficient? I am relatively new to Wikipedia and I truly appreciate your constructive criticism. Peace. Notecardforfree 04:21, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Perhaps I spoke too soon. I see what you mean about using independent sources. However, I know for a fact that everything listed in this article is verifiable and true. I propose this compromise: I will publish my own history of Kibbutz Gal On, and then I will have another editor cite my work as a secondary source. This should fix all the problems. How does this suit you? Notecardforfree 04:48, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops, missed your comment above. In wikipedia, verified means that you find an outside source, like Israeli newspapers or history books that describe Gal On. I don't know if you're yanking my chain about another editor citing a contrived source. You'll find all that and more here. Take care. HG | Talk 05:02, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

text: Welcome and hope you have fun here. Please, this isn't criticism of your work. It's just that an article is generally supposed to have more than one source. Plus, an article about an entity is not supposed to rely entirely on the reporting of that entity. See links above, also WP:Sources. Also, I most certainly am not implying that you have plagiarized. (However, as a college student, you should be cautious. If somebody handed me this as a paper, it would not be accepted because it is not the student's own intellectual work. But our situation here is different.) Finally, the kibbutz historian has a conflict of interest, presumably to present the kibbutz in the best possible light. Anyway, my advice would be to move on to other articles and leave this as is. Hope this is helpful and enjoy! HG | Talk 04:58, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikification
Category talk:Neuroscience

message: Much of what Broca and Wernicke discovered about normal function in anatomy was learned from brain injuries, and more of what we know about Chemistry in the brain was learned from trials of bad drugs. Last time I saw anything about it, about thirty drugs were studied intensely before we settled on Fluoxetine as a treatment.
I orijinally proposed a merjer betweeen NeuroScience and Neurology (into Neurology) as a mechanical operation. It is obvious to me that NeuroScience is a bigger category, perhaps owing to popular usage, but as I don't think wikimedia is either qualified or interested in making a textbook and selecting topics within NeuroScience of core interest to the medical discipline, I am prepared to do the merjer manually, if only because that shows me that a lot of other work should be done.
The topics leading this page explicitly are properly subcategories of Neurology, and many of the topics now listed as subcategories of Neurology fit into them. Anyone else interested in finding the least invasive treatments for disease in the brain is welcome to make my work lighter. Brewhaha@edmc.net 07:06, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merjer In Progress 

message: Neuroscience is a basic research discipline.  Neurology is a clinical discipline.  They cannot be merged.
:Agreed, thankfully Brewhaha's edits were all reverted. --Dpryan 01:22, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neuroscience and Neurology are very distinct fields
Talk:Eyewitness (British TV series)

message: Can anyone provide sources to prove some of the items tagged as fact, or that the series even ever actually aired on TV?  All I can find are the videos, but nothing that says it actually showed on TV as well, and I haven't been able to confirm any of the awards it was supposed to have won. AnmaFinotera (talk) 06:34, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Factual accuracy
Talk:List of Italian-American mobsters by organization

message: (Blanked potentially libelous material. See WP:BLP.)
Not sure this information is accurate.  None of these people exist in Public Data.
No arrest records can be located for these people.  Would like to know from where this 
information originated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeffccox (talk • contribs) 
:I have removed the unsourced list of names of non-notable individuals above. I do not know how many of them are still living, but it is a clear WP:BLP problem. - SummerPhD (talk) 13:59, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Houston/Antonio crime family

message: This article is loaded with unsourced, non-notable people. Some of them are likely still living. Regardless, they are unsourced and some are WP:BLP problems. I am removing all of the red links. - SummerPhD (talk) 14:20, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, it wasn't quite that bad. Mostly, this was just bad linking. This: John "The Teflon Don" Gotti looks for an article named John "The Teflon Don" Gotti. The article about Gotti, though, is at John Gotti. The link, then, should read: John "The Teflon Don" Gotti. - SummerPhD (talk) 14:42, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced material
Talk:Open Artwork System Interchange Standard

message: Unsigned comment: want more info on oasis ?
I have cleaned up the article, and it is now completely readable, though it might be a little too technical. I also removed some conflicting information regarding runtime improvements over GDSII; my understanding is that any runtime improvement is lost when the data has to be unpacked to memory. Please feel free to correct this if I'm wrong. Also, the article is missing citations in quite a few places. Fire (talk) 17:55, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
Category talk:Neuroanatomy

message: Neurology and Anatomy
That's how it should be. If someone is interested in :Category:Neuroanatomy, then
their search should be synonymous with an article being in both categories. It could be done with a redirection to a boolean search. I mean, I was assigned a book called Neuropsychopharmacology. It could've been shortened to Pharmacology. It could also be expanded to ":category:Neurology & :category:Psychology &:category:Pharmacology". That would likely find an article that was also in :category:Pathology. Brewhaha@edmc.net 07:38, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Ottawahitech (talk) 20:44, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  I hate this subcategory
Talk:Grizzly II: The Predator

message: Why is the release date given as 1987, when the film was shot in 1983 and not released ever? The sources do not say it was released, and IMDB just says it was unreleased until 1987, without details. --EdgeNavidad (Talk · Contribs) 22:33, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This has been fixed as of February 20, 2018 [8 years later...quite the new page review backlog] --Nerd1a4i (talk) 16:58, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release date for unreleased film
Talk:Marseille turn

message: Incomplete article was saved; the completion is currently under way. Article has been updated with some referencesYoureng 09:50, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

message: I have requested that this article be moved to Marseille Turn, as that is the term which is used most frequently for this manoeuvre. The term Rocastle Manoeuvre is also used, but far less often. Robotforaday 15:45, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: i made a few pedantic changes to this article, replacing the word 'soccer boots' with 'football boots'. fairly uncontroversial i should hope. however, the article also described something called a flat-soled soccer shoe, i changed this to stud-less training shoe. what these shoes/trainers/boots are actually called i dont know, and i'm not sure if there even is an official name as oppose to what ever marketing/sales term companies decide to use. i think 'stud-less training shoe' counts as just a description of the footware in question and a photo could be used as a source.
also, the theory described under the section 'variations' offers no validation.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Coolhandlogic (talk • contribs) 02:52, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: minor changes

message: In the source provided I do not even see his name, and his article has nothing about it.? Galant Khan (talk) 12:41, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Michael Laudrup]] creator? 

message: The article currently does not describe what the Marseille turn is. The closest it comes is in the "Uses and effectiveness" section, where the reader can infer that the Marseille turn involves two drag-backs and some turning of the player. The article needs a clear description of what it's talking about. Mgnbar (talk) 12:11, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs description
Talk:Cloverfield

message: Hey, the original website was bought out and may either redirect you to articles about digital marketing depending on your browser. I think that the digital marketing redirects happened around the release of 10 Cloverfield Lane. Source: https://www.wired.com/2016/03/cloverfield-arg-sites-8-years-later/ 207.5.58.72 (talk) 20:29, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  1-18-08 website no longer re-directing to Paramount website
Talk:The Adam Carolla Show: Former characters and featured segments

message: To the Wiki editor who placed the above template: Thank you for templating this talk page! However, please be aware that the subject of this article is a radio show and not a television show.
Please accept this notice with all due respect. It is not my intention to scold! I merely wish to draw the attention of the template-adder -- I apologize that I don't yet know how application of these templates works.
I hope I've helped, and not hurt any feelings!
Thanks!
ManfrenjenStJohn 08:39, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: FixedSkierRMH 08:53, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  TACS is a radio show, not a television show
Talk:Underground restaurant

message: This sure does read like an advertisement to me. 75.36.211.245 08:15, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It doesn't read like a wiki article, in any case. I added the cleanup template. --199.60.112.10 (talk) 23:40, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

message: An issue with the article is that the listed restaurants are all unsourced. I could make up a so-called underground restaurant in Albania or Timbukthree and you wouldn't know the difference. This is why we require verifiable reliable sources. Unless each an everyone can be sourced, or better yet shown notability by having an article written, they should be removed. -- Alexf(talk) 19:05, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Their existence can be sourced from http://supperclubfangroup.ning.com/ . However you will not find them in the yellow pages (UK) as they are 'underground' ie secretly in people's homes. That's the whole point! This info has been acceptable to Wikipedia for several years. Why change it now when many more people are interested in attending due to the recession? LHBmypc (talk) 20:16, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: People's interest is not relevant. Notability is. Until the rules are changed, that's what is required. See the Golden Rule. -- Alexf(talk) 20:38, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

text: The listings will each need reliable third party sources.  I have started to add them to help some of the newer editors understand a bit about how to source.  Many are still unsourced, but many do have legitimate third party reliable sources. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 22:33, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced list 

message: I know Cubans hardly pronounce their final s's, but this should surely read "casas particulares".213.127.210.95 (talk) 22:35, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Casa particulares" 

message: I have been eliminating lots of these places from Google Maps. As a Local Guide with a high trust-rating I can do this.
I was not aware of the ‘secret restaurant’ thing, but I’ll look more closely in future.
Still, there are many places shown on Google Maps as ‘restaurants’ that are just private homes where drones go to drink brewskis, scoff burgers, and play GTA or whatever.
Bang, they’re gone wherever I find ‘em.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:44B8:3102:BB00:3403:5A1E:1315:989F (talk) 02:24, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Google Guide
Talk:Ulm Hauptbahnhof

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Kaiserslautern Central Station which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. Bahnfrend (talk) 16:23, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Social software (research field)

message: This article is very clearly against the spirit of wikipedia.  I am also an academic researcher, and I find the author's choice to use wikipedia as a venue for pushing a very marginal and decidedly non-neutral viewpoint on what "social software" might mean to be appalling.  Grow a backbone and let your ideas fight it out in the usual places, i.e., the peer-reviewed literature.  If you're successful you'll get a wikipedia page summarizing your work and viewpoint soon enough.
152.78.64.180 (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 12:14, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: =

message: DPardoeWilson (talk) 02:06, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  disambiguation or move to Social Procedure needed, but ...
Talk:Monkey Dance

message: Isn't Monkey Dance the name of that crazy Steve Ballmer video? -- 212.213.204.99 (talk) 01:42, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Steve Ballmer 
Talk:Adrian Belew Power Trio

message: These are listed as 21 and 20 respectively, but people's ages are not static and dates of birth would be much more helpful.--h i s   s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 08:39, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The ages of Julie and Eric Slick

message: Both Eric Slick and Julie Slick are notable enough to be moved to their own articles. Both are professional internationally touring musicians who have been the subject of magazine articles. K8 fan (talk) 00:05, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Julie Slick is a full-time, international touring member of Stickmen and Eric Slick is a full-time, internationally touring member of Dr. Dog. Neither are member of the Adrian Belew Power Trio any more. Unless someone has an excellent reason to not do so, I will be creating articles for each. K8 fan (talk) 23:09, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eric and Julie Slick should be moved to their own articles
Talk:Robbie Vincent

message: I have a photo (that I have taken) of a BBC Radio 1 sticker which shows Robbie Vincent's 'If it moves, funk it' saying.  I thought it might be a nice images to help illustrate this article.  I haven't a clue which rationale to choose when uploading it, though.  Anyone have any idea?  You can see the image here. - Michael Wincott (talk) 16:52, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  How to add a sticker showing Robbie's catchphrase 

message: Isn't it a bit unusual including those sample playlists. -- Beardo (talk) 20:01, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Playlists
Talk:Lemma (logic)

message: Logic is math, and lemmas in logic are just the logic specific instances of mathematical lemmas. There is no reason to have two separate articles here.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rblakem (talk • contribs) 17:14, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If the user is looking for the meaning of "lemma" in logic but does not know that the logical meaning is derived from the mathematical meaning, then he or she would be better served by keeping this article separate from the maths article. Bmeacham (talk) 20:07, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge lemma (math) with lemma (logic) articles? 

message: "a lemma is simultaneously a contention for premises below it and a premise for a contention above it."
1. What do "below" and "above" mean? Do they mean "appearing after" and "appearing before," respectively, or "appearing before" and "appearing after," respectively? 
2. The link embedded in "contention" now leads to the "Conclusion" wiki which makes no mention of contention. It seems to mean a point asserted for which one argues, or at any rate asserted as part of an argument. Does it have some special technical meaning here and, if so, what is it?
The Tetrast (talk) 23:16, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need clarifications for the general reader