lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Mall Wood Green

message: The article seems to meet the prose and verifiability criteria of the Good Article criteria. There are still a couple of manual of style issues which need to be addressed, specifically issues with WP:MSH. For example, the article title should not be included in section headers in the article, and there is unnecessary capitalization in some of these section headers. I believe this can be addressed by also reorganizing slightly to better cover the aspects of the mall's history. Instead of separate sections for 'Wood Green Shopping City' and 'Redevelopment as The Mall Wood Green', combine these into a single 'History' section, with a subsection entitled 'Redevelopment'.
I believe that there are also some issues with completeness. Certainly a mall of this size has some annual events and fairs to attract visitors. The only event mentioned is a "craft fair", which is pretty vague. This can be expanded, and better to include a new section for annual events instead of combining it with history.
The article's lead mentions seven anchor stores, but the article itself doesn't mention any of them at all. While listing every single tenant in the store is unnecessary, I think the anchor stores should be mentioned, and it might be good to cover some information on the general types of stores, and perhaps some of the more successful ones as well. Also, is there some sort of food court in the mall?
How many jobs are provided by stores in the mall? There doesn't seem to be any information on the employment situation.
Checking the article against the stability, and WP:NPOV criteria, I don't see any issues. Additionally, all of the images are tagged with appropriate fair-use or free image copyright tags, so that is fine.
I think once the above-mentioned criteria are solved, the article will likely meet the Good Article criteria. I will review it again in about a week. Cheers! Dr. Cash 04:27, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: On hold time has elapsed; the above comments have not been addressed; article failed. The article may be renominated once the issues have been addressed. Dr. Cash 21:35, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: For info of anyone watching - I haven't forgot this one! Will clean it up when I get the chance —  iridescent 22:53, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Review
Talk:A Fifth of Beethoven

message: Removed the following line that was just a rewording of the one above it.
" "Fifth" was released in 1976 becoming Murphy's best known work and his only Top 40 hit on the Billboard Hot 100, where it reached the #1 position for one week. It also went to number 10 on Billboards Black Singles chart in the same year. " Pongley (talk) 16:23, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reword 

message: What about the album titled "A Fifth of Beethoven"? It seems that there is no WP article for it, only an article for the title song on the album. — Loadmaster (talk) 18:05, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Album? 
Category talk:Units and formations of the Union Army from California

message: I notice that the 71st PA and the Philadelphia Brigade are included in this category. I know that these units were originally designated as California units but as far as I know they were composed largely of Pennsylvanians with few if any Californians. I don't think this is enough basis for inclusion of these articles in this category. Wild Wolf (talk) 22:29, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Pennsylvania units in this category
Talk:Muntjac

message: This article states that the Muntjac was introduced into England as a result of animals escaping from Woburn Safari park (paragraph 2 under Description). However, this statement is fairly comprehensively disputed under the article 'Reeves's Muntjac', section "Introduction into England".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryansuchocki (talk • contribs) 00:55, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict with another article 

message: Give more info on the muntjac please  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.15.232.140 (talk) 20:32, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  More info. 

message: Note cross-linked from Chevrotain page due to shared or confused characteristics.
The recent news article about the Mouse-Deer's predilections described them, as this article does, as having noticeably enlarged canines. This is a characteristic that I noted when trying to evict what was identified to me as a Muntjac (common feral introduced animals in England) ; however this characteristic isn't noted in the Muntjac page. Which suggests that either the identification I was given was wrong and perhaps Mouse-Deer are also wild in Britain, or that there is a significant error in the Muntjac page. 
The BBC Wildlife page  [ See Springwatch Spotters Guide] informs us that "Its protruding canine teeth look a little like tusks. Also, note the rounded and arched back."
Aidan Karley (talk) 13:09, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canine Teeth 

message: How about something on its bark, which may be heard even if the deer is not seen. Some way of telling the difference between this bark and that of a fox would be good. 78.149.114.89 (talk) 21:47, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bark? 

message: As I know there are differences in Binomial name,  Barking deer is Muntiacus vaginalis and Muntiacus reevesi is called Reeves's muntjac. -Nirmal Dulal (talk) 15:24, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Different Binomial name   

message: Hard to find any evidence for this at all: just wiki clones quoting your article. Equinox ◑ 20:48, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Mastreani deer", really? 

message: <<The genus Muntiacus has 12 recognized species>>
There is 14 species listed in the article... As well, the ASM do not recognize M. montanus. We should look at how we fix this problem. Gimly24 (talk) 13:30, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misleading species listing
Talk:Reeves's muntjac

message: Anyone know which Oshima this refers to?  The Oshima page is a disambiguation page listing several  Rojomoke (talk) 13:04, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oshima 

message: Lead para says it is found in Ireland. I don't have access to the given reference book, but online sources suggest it has been found in Northern Ireland (i.e. part of UK) but not Republic of Ireland. Also I think the lead should just say it's been introduced to UK, with details in the section "Introduction into UK"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Newburyjohn (talk • contribs) 10:40, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  UK/Ireland distribution 

message: This article is apparently part of WikiProject Japan. Why? There seems to be no connection at all. I don't know how to remove the article from the WikiProject.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Newburyjohn (talk • contribs) 10:52, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japan? 

message: crepuscular animal. 
Here in the central Taiwan hills they seem active at any time of the day or night, as can be heard from their distinctive "barking" or encountering them in the forest. Jidanni (talk) 11:29, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  crepuscular? 

message: Mention if the "bark" is produced by a quick exhale, or inhale?! Jidanni (talk) 01:42, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inhale or exhale
Talk:Southern red muntjac

message: please add also the size in the metric system (cm, kg) for non americans. thanks.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.79.87.237 (talk) 05:02, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Size 

message: I have a few comments/observations (unfortunately I can't fix them myself):
The map showing the range in the infox is missing China
The intro section states the antlers grow to 5.9" but the description section says they are only 1-2"
The section on reproduction states (without citation) "Indian muntjacs are distinguished ... in showing no evidence of a specific breeding season" but the next section on behavior mentions a rutting season several times.  I would suggest removing the reference to "season" and leave it as simply the period when males begin looking for mates (or vice versa) if it happens any time of the year.
Similiarly, calling them both diurnal and nocturnal in the same sentence without explaining what causes them to act one way or the other seems unhelpful.  Do they not show a preference or do animals closer to humans become nocturnal?
The section on genetics could use some expansion as that seems particularly notable for this species
Lime in the Coconut 13:26, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: * Indian muntjac →  – "Indian muntjac" is an alternative name for "Red muntjac" and that's what sources say. Jaspergeli (talk) 07:10, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page Move Request 

message: MAJOR EDIT : Changes mades [except MSW3] section mostly represent the current Muntiacus muntjak. This species has split in two a while back, with the elevation of the subspecies Muntiacus m. vaginalis to species. They are now the Southern (M. muntjak) and Northern red muntjac (M. vaginalis). (previous edit with former Indian Muntjac info) ( https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Indian_muntjac&oldid=1138615722 )
The northern red muntjac (Muntiacus vaginalis) is now distinct from the Indian Muntjac/Common Muntjac (now known as Southern red muntjac). Populations north of Sunda and Malayasia of Muntiacus muntjak are now attributed to the species Muntiacus vaginalis (the northern red muntjac).Gimly24 (talk) 23:20, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I saw this at [[WT:WikiProject Mammals#Request Move (Indian muntjac -- > Southern red muntjac)]]. Reading that and the way you have edited the article make it clear that you want  moved to Southern red muntjac. I have performed the necessary move. Please check that the article and the talk page are as wanted and reply here if there is a problem. Johnuniq (talk) 02:44, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you Johnuniq. I will let you know if there is a problem. Enjoy your day :) Gimly24 (talk) 02:47, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page Move Request [February 2023]
Talk:Phillipsite

message: Please can someone give an idea of size, such as a scale bar. This is very basic stuff. Not including these is bad practice and makes the images of very little value. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.153.64.39 (talk • contribs) 
:I have answered here. Best regards Rhanyeia 12:33, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Images
Talk:Hairy-fronted muntjac

message: According to IUCN, reports of the species from Burma result from confusion with another species, Gongshan muntjac, which might the same species. This is not the view adopted by IUCN. I suggest following this source, and have removed the text about hairy-fronted muntjacs in Burma. Micromesistius (talk) 09:27, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  China endemic 
Talk:Phlegon of Tralles

message: At the end of the "Reference to Jesus" section, the article says:
Origen mentions that Phlegon also wrote that "Jesus, while alive, was of no assistance to himself, but that he arose after death, and exhibited the marks of his punishment, and showed how his hands had been pierced by nails".[1]
However, when you read the actual text: https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf04.vi.ix.ii.lviii.html
You'll see (with more careful reading) that the quote appears to actually be of Celsus' speech, not of Phlegon's.
This is shown by the last two sentences:
Speaking next of the statements in the Gospels, that after His resurrection He showed the marks of His punishment, and how His hands had been pierced, he asks, “Who beheld this?”  And discrediting the narrative of Mary Magdalene, who is related to have seen Him, he replies, “A half-frantic woman, as ye state.”  And because she is not the only one who is recorded to have seen the Saviour after His resurrection, but others also are mentioned, this Jew of Celsus calumniates these statements also in adding, “And some one else of those engaged in the same system of deception!”
In other words, the part that was from Phlegon was only the "who relates that these events took place at the time when our Saviour suffered" part, in reference to "the earthquake and the darkness". All the other quoted text is from Celsus.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Venryx (talk • contribs) 09:13, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccurate attribution to Phlegon 

message: Reliable sources must be cited for all parts and sub parts of an article. No original research is the Wikipedia standard. Bluepenciltime (talk) 22:33, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  More citations needed tag added
Talk:Prostitution in Finland

message: At various times this page has been nominated for deletion, and merged into Prostitution in Europe. As a Nordic country it deserves its own page and there is plenty of information available. I cleaned it up a bit. --Michael Goodyear (talk) 15:36, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Well done --John B123 (talk) 16:00, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:Prostitution in Denmark

message: Re EepEep's edit;  I think this material ought to stay.  Its well cited and well written.  I agree with EepEep's sentiment that it seems mostly relevent to prostituion in Europe rather than just Denmark, but I don't think the article as it stands is overcrowed and I think the material is relavent.  Don't feel too strongly about this though.  NickCT (talk) 05:45, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah there it is.  I agree it's well written and would be quite appropriate to add to Prostitution in Europe. But it doesn't seem to be about Denmark at all. EeepEeep (talk) 05:49, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Isn't it basicly just saying that Denmark is embroiled in the same prostitution wave that is hitting the rest of Europe?  Seems noteworthy in relation to the subject.NickCT (talk) 06:00, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Without a cite saying specifically that, it would be original research. EeepEeep (talk) 06:07, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah ok fine. None of the cited material is specific to Denmark. Given that's the case, it's hard to support its inclusion. NickCT (talk) 06:33, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re the rapid increase in foreign prostitutes 

message: Agree poor article. I have no idea why people think the US State Department is a reliable source for information on sex work - it is highly ideological, but appears on virtually every prostitution page in Wikipedia. Re above - suggest use actual TAMPEP report not news articles. Don't use terms like 'recent' they date rapidly. Articles need to be in past tense. Michael Goodyear (talk) 16:45, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I have looked primarily at more general copyediting matters (grammar, sentence structure etc), however, the article needs to be reviewed by an expert (maybe the Wikipedia Sex Worker Taskforce) to cover issues such as appropriate terminology ("prostitute" vs "sex worker", validity of the term, "pimp", etc etc). and the appropriateness of discussing sex worker activism in the article. --Soulparadox 11:15, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  General status 

message: I keep on reading about "the nordic model" of prostitution, which is apparently what Sweden is, or is defined by Sweden, or something like that.  
I think it means "Illegal to Buy Services".  But the article Nordic_model is completely unrelated.  Somebody needs to make an article by that name to explain the concept.
OsamaBinLogin (talk) 05:39, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The Nordic Model"
Talk:Bona of Pisa

message: Bibliotheca Hagiographica Latina1389-90, ref https://www.archive.org/stream/bibliothecahagio01boll?ref=ol#page/206/mode/2up  --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 13:06, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  suggested BHL info
Talk:San Francisco Bay Times

message: I put Rink Foto and Don Baird in the see also section as i feel a notable writers/contributors section is not yet ready. I know there are many others that can also be added as the newspaper has been in operation so long. I think Gene Price is a long-time theater critic and Sister Dana writes about queer politic events. Rink Foto has been taking photos of LGBTQ events that appear in nearly every issue. Don Baird has been writing a live music column/opinion column for over 15 years. Benjiboi 20:41, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I dont see the point in having people listed in "See also" unless they have an article, or at least a red link because you believe they are notable.  I doubt that Don Baird is the same guy. John Vandenberg (chat) 07:27, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Although Rink Foto likely should have an article as his photos appear in books  -- Banjeboi 18:36, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable writers/contributors
Talk:Newspapers of Yorkshire

message: The entire section on defunct papers is a verbatim (or close to) copy from http://www.british-history.ac.uk/report.aspx?compid=36391, dated 1961. The page needs to be deleted, and recreated only with the initial listing. Charles Matthews (talk) 14:57, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio
Talk:Along Came Jones (song)

message: I suppose the "Dudley Doo-Right" cartoons (Rocky and Bullwinkle) have as much to do with the Gary Cooper movie as this song, but it would be nice to find a connection to either one.  72.177.123.145 (talk) 01:32, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legacy? 
Talk:Another Saturday Night

message: Ain't there several different versions by Cooke, maybe single and album version? In one version, he shouts "Everybody!" several times during the outro, and in the other, it's "One more time!" and "Soundin' mighty good!" instead. Where does each version originate (single vs. album)? Can they also be told apart by different lenghts? In any case, both versions sound like done in the studio to me, they're definitely no live versions. I have the "Soundin' mighty good!" version here and it runs 2:42, though with c. 2-3 seconds of silence at the end. --79.242.219.119 (talk) 01:06, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Several versions by Cooke
Talk:Kieran Scott

message: The user who created this article claims to be an employee of Simon & Schuster, the subject's publisher. --Butseriouslyfolks 20:51, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been revised now.--4.249.81.46 21:32, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict of Interest Notice
Talk:At the Hop

message: Should mention it was on the American Graffiti soundtrack... AnonMoos (talk) 11:27, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

message: Is it really doo-wop?  Having just read the Wik description of doo-wop, I don't see that it is (e.g., it lacks nonsense syllables and it has strong instrumentation).  Could some-one musically versed check?Kdammers (talk) 09:19, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  doo-wop?
Talk:Chi Tau (local)

message: Question: Does the news story involved with this chapter rate a move to high Importance?Trey (talk) 23:02, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Importance

message: What are the names of those convicted?  Since they are almost certainly over 18, they should be included in this article.Bill Heller (talk) 11:04, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Names

message: The article is called Chi Tau, not 'The hazing death of Matthew Carrington'. Accordingly, there should be more information about Chi Tau - especially of the consequences for the 'rogue' fraternity (and/or fraternity members) of Carrington's unfortunate death. --Centrepull (talk) 00:46, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I made several changes to meet this request.  Jax MN (talk) 16:48, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further info needed 

message: A different, older, larger and national Chi Tau organization was established in 1920, with almost a dozen chapters.  It is unlikely to have any connection, as its remaining chapters were disbanded or went local in 1929, leaving a ten year gap before formation of the Chico organization.  As this larger, older group has precedence over the Chico local I am moving the Chico local to a page that reflects its independent establishment. Look for the posting of a Chi Tau national page on approximately 8 Jun 2019. I will add a Wikilink once the moves are effected.  Jax MN (talk) 21:50, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: After researching and working on these pages, it is clear to me that there is no connection between the North Carolina group and the Chico State group. I've added an infobox and logo for the Chico State group, from the first yearbook where they are mentioned. In it (1940 ed.) there is a brief note discussing that the first month after formation their efforts were spent organizing the young chapter, and that they didn't have time to do social events. This reference didn't refer to any predecessor group. Jax MN (talk) 21:43, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikilink added to the comment above. Again, this local had no connection to the older, larger and dormant national of the same name. Jax MN (talk) 18:45, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moving to Chi Tau (local) 

message: The section on aftermath seems highly POV, with statements such as:
* "...died a senseless, painful death, leaving his family shattered..."
* "...spent hard time in jail."
* "...giving little attention to the nuanced distinction..."
* "...stain against the idea of..."
* Etc.
This section is written as if it is a defence of other fraternities in the area, as opposed to being a section of an encyclopedia.
--205.124.38.16 (talk) 15:49, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with you, needs to be made more neutral. I think the entire first paragraph can be deleted, with the information on time sentenced moved elsewhere.Naraht (talk) 15:55, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aftermath is written in a very POV way.
Talk:The Daily WTF

message: This should not have deleted; WTF is a significiant technology publication.—Preceding unsigned comment added by John.adleson (talk • contribs) 
:I've raised an AFD to this can be discussed.  --Oscarthecat 20:59, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I deleted this as a , but resored it on seeing that it had gone for AfD.--Anthony.bradbury 21:46, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

text: AFD is not a vote.  --Chris (talk) 05:53, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Why is this page in the Software engineering disasters category? 203.134.124.36 (talk) 02:30, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Presumably because it documents the fine details of so many - David Gerard (talk) 12:32, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  category: Software engineering disasters
Talk:Deborah Reber

message: The user who created this article claims to be an employee of Simon & Schuster, the subject's publisher. --Butseriouslyfolks 20:51, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict of Interest Notice 

message: Article needs expansion. I have removed the "BLP sources" tag as I've added a couple of sources for the body text.  I have also removed the "COI" tag (see above) as although the original editor was connected to the subject through the publisher, the text (such as it is) is factual and presented in a neutral point of view style.--Plad2 (talk) 22:23, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Work needed 