lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Canada (New France)

message: The main problem with WP's coverage of New France is that there is little continuity between the different locales.  Americans editors have made the Louisiana page very good, but much of it duplicates the main page.  Meanwhile the main page concentrates way too much on Canada, and neglects Acadia, Louisiana, etc.  There is a separate page for the colony of Canada but it is mostly unused.  To help readers, and editors get a better understanding of how New France was organized.  I proposed this new Navbox template.  The first section I am committed to and eventually I want to see it on this page regardless.  The rest is open to debate and change. 
::PROTOTYPE NAVBOX DELETED
What do you think?  Is it too broad, too narrow?  Would a list of topics be better?  Thanks for the imput.  Kevlar67 21:40, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Under Notes, this link no longer works:
NRC. "New France c. 1740", in The Atlas of Canada, Natural Resources Canada, 2003-10-06, retrieved 13 December 2009  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.235.198.118 (talk) 20:41, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken link 

message: Making a list of ref to use in expansion--Moxy (talk) 07:51, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  sources 

message: So going to take time this week to work on this article. I guess first I will fix the date...1534 to 1535 .....and explain how the name came up. Will then write about the fishing fleets, first settlement attempts and exploration of the two main basins  in the first section. Second section we should talk about the main settlements and how they lived (economic). Third section about colficts and native contributions. Then not sure will work on this as I go.--Moxy (talk) 22:01, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Cool! North8000 (talk) 21:57, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fixing up the article  

message: This  description of "Canada" as being only Quebec contradicts the maps in article, which show Canada as extending into what is now Ontario and the US. Meters (talk) 04:03, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like you already implemented what you are talking about. I think that what you did is fine.  North8000 (talk) 01:24, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradictory description
Talk:The Call from the Past

message: It really looks like we're grasping at straws if we're using forum posts as references.  Personally, I don't think we need episode articles at all, but if we must go with individual articles, I think short blurbs will suffice.  Allusions and symbols belong in their own article, in my opinion. --SteveA026 21:40, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed the "forum reference".--Nohansen 12:36, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:West St. Paul, Minnesota

message: There seems to be an edit dispute between another user and I over weather or not Marthaler Hill is the highest point in Dakota County. I found a website from a man who went to the high points of every county in Minnesota and he lists Buck Hill as the highest point. http://cohp.org/mn/Dakota_1.html. Also after a look on Google Earth I found two other places in Dakota County that have a high elevation then Marthaler Hill, one is located just south of Buck Hill in Lakeville, and the other is located in Apple Valley.
Jay Ann 08:21, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Marthaler Hill

message: The article states: "The quirky naming in part comes from the fact that the city is on the "west" bank of the Mississippi River—the river flows toward the east at this point." Aside from being logically amiss (how can something flowing east have a west bank?), a look at a map shows this to be inaccurate. The river forms the land of West St. Paul into a peninsula, flowing northeast, east, then south around it.
- Jack Vermicelli, 2warped@gmail.com 98.243.83.191 (talk) 23:03, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: geography

message: Does a city really have a religion? And if we are listing churches in the area, should there not be an effort to list all of them?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peter.edstrom (talk • contribs) 18:43, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Religion
Talk:Theodor Reuss

message: How was he an anarchist if he worked for the Prussian police (possibly to expose anarchists)? I'd like a citation.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.47.151.92 (talk) 23:21, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The Matrimonial Question from an Anarchistic Point of View (1887)?--Rodneyorpheus (talk) 16:23, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anarchist? 
Talk:Phyllis Seckler

message: I am making an edit with a further claim to notability, and will make further improvements to the article this week, once I have a chance to consult and consolidate my print references.  Hoping we can restart the clock here, and thus am also removing the prodwarning. --Geoff Capp (talk) 10:17, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Objecting to deletion 

message: An anonymous user keeps trying to add the fact that she was an "Adept" to the first line. Whoever you are, please try to learn and understand Wikipedia's policies here. Unless you can produce good verifiable third-party evidence that she was an "Adept" (whatever that is), your assertion falls in the category of original research, and one of the pillars of Wikipedia is No Original Research. Please refrain from this, or produce sources to verify your claim. --Rodneyorpheus (talk) 11:29, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Adept?
Talk:Pectoral cross

message: Pectorale and pectoral cross discuss the same item and should be merged. Ekem 21:47, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done 23 January 2007  —Preceding unsigned comment added by MishaPan (talk • contribs) 20:25, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Template talk:Venango County, Pennsylvania

message: I see no reason this template should lose the information it contains solely to be like those of other counties in Pennsylvania that do not have the same type and amount of history that Venango County has. Do not change this again without discussing it here. --Chris Griswold  (☎☓) 21:47, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with Tstrobaugh, there should be consistency across the navigation templates for all of Pennsylvania's counties and this template should kept in its original form. VerruckteDan 22:10, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: See? Now that's the type of argument I can agree with. --Chris Griswold  (☎☓) 23:13, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Nobody objected to the changes I made. I objected to your changes; that is the only difference. I'm not clear on what you mean by a new issue; my issue was that you have removed information from this template, and I disagreed with it. I didn't feel that adding the info to the article was a reasonable replacement. That's all.--Chris Griswold  (☎☓) 23:08, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, there's one more difference. My changes took place one by one, over the course of a month or so. Yours was a complete revert in one edit. If anyone should mention their intentions, it should be the person who makes one large, sweeping change like that. --Chris Griswold  (☎☓) 23:15, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I see you took a lot of time building a template for an area you are familiar with. If I had known you had attachment to the "odd man out" template I would have broached the subject with you. My last 7-800 edits have been standardizing places in Pennsylvania, check it out. I could not foresee any objections to my edits as they are all in good faith and accurate and standard. You yourself have not raised any objections other than the unstated, that you were attached to the template. If I had gotten to Venango earlier I would have objected to YOUR deviation from the norm and "sweeping change" of 8-23-2006 [], I don't see you discussing that change with anyone, that is what you are accusing me of. I just went back to the previous, standard version, it is YOU who made a "sweeping change".Tstrobaugh 23:27, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't need to explain it. I was bold, and I added to the template gradually over months, and nobody raised an objection during the course of five months. You made large changes and I questioned it. That's the difference. Learn it and stop being self-righteous. And don't assume you understand my "unspoken reasons" for wanting this template to actually be a decent navbox that represents the county, rather than just a mechanical list of townships. --Chris Griswold  (☎☓) 21:32, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Same as other county templates?
Talk:Kittatinny Mountain

message: The contemporary word Kittuteney translates as great city, (kitt meaning great) Djflem (talk) 06:33, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kittuteney  

message: Sorry, I found your request, as entered, confusing and malformed. There is only one article that is proposed for move here; the other two are redirects. We do not "move" redirects. Thus, I've refactored your request to a single page move. – wbm1058 (talk) 03:51, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Procedural comments 

message: * :Kittatinny Mountains →  – It is only one mountain. The plural "Mountains" is improper. The singular "Mountain" is currently a redirect. USGS calls is "Kittatinny Mountain". – JackTheVicar (talk) 17:11, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Previously executed technical request
Talk:Rafael Cordero Santiago

message: Even though I liked the look of the previous infobox on this article, I replaced it with the one used for American mayors in the US for standardization (I still left the previous infobox in the edit box). But I was wondering about using that infobox for other Puerto Rican mayors. Thief12 00:43, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks fine. We should probably do that to all of the articles about mayors. --Boricuaeddie 00:59, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox
Talk:Recent

message: There's a geologic epoch called Recent (synonym: Holocene).  A dozen or so taxoboxes (for example Opisthokont) link to it.  A slightly larger number of pages link to Holocene directly, but I didn't see any from taxoboxes (in the usage of "jurassic to recent" and the like).
Of course, recent means other things in other contexts, but I'm not sure any have any precise encyclopedic meaning.  If they are, then Recent could be a disambiguation page.
:As this paleontological usage is such an unusual use of the term, it seems appropriate to make this a disambiguation page between the dictionary definition and "Holocene". This goes against guidelines, but it would appear a valid case where WP:IAR leads to a more useful result. Most people who type "recent" into Wikipedia will not expect to be pointed to a geological epoch. In principle the disambiguation page could be expanded to cover other geological and astronomical uses, but this seems artificial, and like an alternative dictionary definition anyway. The OED has two relevant definitions:  "Palaeontol. and Geol. Extant; not fossil; belonging to or represented in the present geological period or epoch. Now disused." , and "Geol. Usu. in form Recent. Designating the geological epoch that continues to the present, ... begun about 11,500 years ago; belonging to or characteristic of this epoch; = Holocene adj.Holocene is now the preferred term." Pol098 (talk) 11:06, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geologic era called Recent
Talk:Atenienses de Manatí (baseball)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 06:53, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Atenienses de Manatí →  – no clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC Joeykai (talk) 00:07, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 30 April 2021
Talk:Bleeding heart tetra

message: The red back makes it look more like Hyphessobrycon pyrrhonotus  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.210.145.159 (talk) 02:35, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed.  It looks just plain wrong to me.  There is a picture of what the fish actually looks like here. Huw Powell (talk) 02:23, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Why is it not corrected? It is just H. pyrrhonotus - at first glance! 46.252.225.59 (talk) 14:03, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect photo?
Talk:Women in warfare and the military (1900–1945)

message: I support a merge. D-Fluff has had E-Nuff 18:33, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: I am working on reformatting this article to Wikipedia standards and adding a lead section. Misha412 (talk) 20:48, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Reformat
Talk:Bloodfin tetra

message: IU've added a new section hope someone expands it  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Notedgrant (talk • contribs) 14:36, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  new section 

message: I'm having a hard time understanding how exactly this is anything like an advertisement... anyone? 24.3.52.23 (talk) 04:01, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. It looks like a very old tag. I'm going to remove it, and make a few fixes to the page. --Tryptofish (talk) 16:10, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertisement?
Talk:Thayeria boehlkei

message: I've rewritten all of this article as it was previously and direct copy from fishbase. MidgleyDJ 01:07, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copright - rewrites. 

message: I changed this article title from blackline penguinfish to Thayeria boehlkei does anyone object to this? My reason is: the species has multiple, not-in-common-use common names ie: blackline penguinfish, blackline Thayeria, hockey-stick tetra, penguin fish and penguin tetra. I've cited reliable sources in the article for this multiplicity of common names. MidgleyDJ 01:30, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change of title
Talk:Cangrejeros de Santurce (baseball)

message: The article doesn't mention why and when they became no longer part of the league. Enigmamsg 14:29, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  No longer participating? 

message: I was impressed by the amount of information in this article. Kudos to CaribbeanHQ. I have just one suggestion that at least the first reference to Van Hyning be fully disclosed with the full name of the author (first name is missing), full names of co-authors, name and city of the publisher/pubishing company, complete title of the book, and the year when published. Kudos, Mercy11 (talk) 03:07, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The reference format itself is the one known as "Harvard style", with a "full citation [being] given in the references section". I used it because it's "old school", being employed in some FAs and other promoted articles, including our very own Puerto Rican Amazon. Then again, it's also easier to write long articles while using it. - Caribbean~H.Q. 02:29, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes
Talk:List of Disney's Hollywood Studios attractions

message: Welcome!  Have fun and be open!
Colacadstink 22:13, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is a bit of information missing for "former attractions" (or perhaps former entertainment) and I apologize, I am unable to supply it completely myself because I do not have the dates or the time frame. But when the theme park opened as Disney's MGM Studios, their three sound stages that they had were used for a couple of different shows. One of them being Disney Channel's revival of The Mickey Mouse Club, which was recorded on location and guests could be chosen to be a part of the live studio audience. This was the same MMC that birthed the careers of Britney Spears, Justin Timberlake, Christina Aguilera and Ryan Gosling to name a few. Eventually the show was cancelled long before the sound stage was closed to make way for Toy Story Mania. I don't have the dates, but I know this to be true because it is mentioned on the main article for the theme park under "Production History." Perhaps someone can get the information needed so it can be added to the article. Aidensdaddy2k9 (talk) 02:02, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Information
Talk:Art Attack

message: The series guide was compiled from info received from Hit Entertainment. Dates were added and checked from a number of sources inc. BFI and a number of newspaper TV listings archives. Please do not simply delete information, use the talk option to discuss changes.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nesw (talk • contribs) 09:10, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Air dates and guide

message: I've deleted some info and asked for sources for others. I've also reverted the date from 1990 to 1989, the Art Attack website states that it began in 1989, not 1990.--NeilEvans 22:16, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Citation of sources

message: Jassa Ahluwalia doesn't seem to have a page on Wikipedia even though he is the presenter of the programme which I think needs to be fixed. DylanWhittaker (talk) 16:48, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page needed for host 

message: i didnt catch his last name as the credits was moving too fast to read the entire name but first name seemed to be leon.84.213.46.153 (talk) 02:26, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  current presenter is not shown in the article
Talk:Auckland Southern Motorway

message: I created a template to add to this page (pictured right), but every time I try to add it, it merges with the exit list, and will not appear level with the top line. The templates name is Template:New Zealand motorway, and I have added to Wellington Urban Motorway to see if it is confined to this page, but it still won't align properly. Could someone please help on this, as I don't know what to do about it. Laydan Mortensen 22:18, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't worry, I fixed it. There was no curly bracket ({) at the end of the template. Laydan Mortensen 19:44, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Motorway template 
Talk:Kristjan Rand

message: His name is actually spelled Kristjan, not Kristian. I don't know why it's spelled that way here but maybe there's a strange reason. If not, someone should edit the page and change it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.191.207.236  (talk • contribs) 10:19, 27 September 2009
:His name is spelled "Kristian" in his article because that is how the ISU spells it. Can you provide sources that his preferred English spelling is "Kristjan"? Kolindigo (talk) 00:52, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Your own link spells his name "Kristjan". --Mardu (talk) 00:37, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: LOL, that was fast. It didn't when I linked to it. I'll move the article. :) Kolindigo (talk) 04:43, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:Dog whispering

message: initiating article to correspond with other related articles.
Tintina 22:22, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

message: Dog whispering may just be a fad phrase used by Cesar Millan.  I see no independent usage. --Bejnar 01:43, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, and nothing links here, either. Merging & redirecting.  Elf | Talk 04:33, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger
Talk:Ekaterina Rubleva

message: I noticed that this information has been deleted previously. Hopefully, the seven sources I provided are enough to demonstrate notability, particularly the first one, which indicates that numerous Finnish newspapers covered the incident at the time. I realize that some of these links might not necessarily constitute reliable sources under normal circumstances, but the numerous pictures of the incident should at least provide ample evidence that it actually happened.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.103.96.189 (talk) 07:34, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: 2009 European Championships
Talk:Nostradamus (album)

message: Visions Single
----
The drum sound on Visions is heavily reminiscent of the Ram It Down era when the band used programmable drums.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.83.137.242 (talk) 16:20, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: why did someone delete "symphonic metal" from the genres? how in the world is it even debateable that this album is symphonic metal?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.163.16.166 (talk) 21:38, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  oh for christ sake... 

message: I have a problem with "The band's first concept album with Rob Halford" - which, as worded, makes it sound as if they did a concept album with Ripper Owens...which is not the case. It should more accurately be "The band's first concept album". FiggazWithAttitude (talk) 20:47, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  First concept album
Talk:Paegan Terrorism Tactics

message: There is a current disagreement on the genres which should apply to this album. Under the AllMusic review here: https://www.allmusic.com/album/paegan-terrorism-tactics-mw0000080507 it states "Acid Bath's second album further establishes the band's unique Southern punk/sludge/goth metal hybrid" This at the very least would denote that the genre of Gothic Metal should also apply to this album (punk might be a bit of a stretch), as Acid Bath does hybrid multiple genres unto its albums. If you have any input into what genres should be listed, that would be very much welcome. Comfisofa (talk) 15:55, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Southern punk isnt really something that exists (and sludge is already a combination of punk and metal so it would be redundant either way), so we only have sludge and goth metal. Since the vast majority of sources describe this album (and the band as a whole) as sludge metal we should just go with that and not give too much weight to fringe views like that of allmusic in this case. Gothic metal is probably an influence but if we include every single influence, we'd also have to add grunge, southern metal, industrial, death metal, stoner metal, and probably a bunch of other stuff as well which is obviously ridiculous --FMSky (talk) 16:01, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genres
Talk:Dylan Jones

message: I have commenced a tidy-up of the Bibliography section using cite templates. Capitalization and punctuation follow standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, as much as Wikipedia templates allow it. ISBNs and other persistent identifiers, where available, are commented out, but still available for reference. Feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 04:02, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography
Talk:AS-103

message: If the article discusses the co-launching of Pegasus A, there should be a link to this article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pegasus_%28satellite%29 147.145.40.43 22:43, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Mlm42 (talk) 04:21, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pegasus A reference 

message: :The satellite was commanded off on August 29, 1968.
Could someone knowledgeable rephrase this to remove the jargon?  Tempshill (talk) 05:50, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added a tag to this statement. I'm not sure either. Mlm42 (talk) 04:21, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Fast-forward to 2013: Thanks to whatever dunderhead removed the tagged statement; you removed valuable info, namely the end of mission. Far from being "jargon", "commanded off" means exactly what it says: the satellite was shut off by ground command (we might call it decommissioned?) This marks the end of the mission, NOT the decay of the satellite years later. I hope I can find it in the history. JustinTime55 (talk) 18:11, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

text: I found it and just restored it. I would also like to know what imbecille removed most all mention of the Pegasus satellite from this article. (Same applies to the two successors, A-104 and A-105.) JustinTime55 (talk) 18:35, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jargon