Talk:Storm Prediction Center

message: Hey, I was wondering if anyone knew what the pink arrows on the Watches, Warnings, and Advisories map mean.Dr Denim 12:15, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The area west of the line has been removed form the watch. Error man 22:33, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: ah...thanks...Dr Denim 04:00, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: There should be a section added for this. http://www.spc.noaa.gov/products/outlook/pwo.html  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.123.223.183 (talk) 16:23, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  PUBLIC SEVERE WEATHER OUTLOOK section? 

message: *Reference 12 is dead.Jason Rees (talk) 22:06, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: *Ok, , but I put publiser as department and work as the product. Ks0stm (T•C•G) 22:53, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  To do 

message: I'm with the hurricane folks, and someone told me to come over here and review it, so here I am! :) 
*First, I think the lede could be better constructed. If I didn't know the article and I read the first sentence (paragraph, really), I would be lost very quickly. The first sentence is too technical, and while the information is valuable, it could be placed better. I suggest re-arranging the lede, perhaps putting the first sentence of the 3rd paragraph as the opening sentence.
** Flip-flopped the first and last two paragraphs. Ks0stm (T•C•G) 22:05, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: I notice that an IP merged the Day 2 and Day 3 probability tables per a service change announcement, but from my reading of the announcement the only change to those products was that now both have the general thunder line, not that any probabilities were changed. The page describing the probabilities does not appear to have been updated since the service change came into effect. Can anyone confirm that my analysis of this is correct? Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 08:09, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Day 3 outlook table change 

message: It the probability to categorical outlook conversions have been changed for 2017. Day one outlooks have become more complicated with now taking significant severe probabilities into account. The article and tables shown on this page should be changed to reflect these changes. See http://www.spc.noaa.gov/misc/SPC_probotlk_info.html for the current versions. Stormchaser89 (talk) 
04:44, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Probability to categorical outlook conversions changes for 2017 

message: this is lolkikmoddi im not logged in but could we put in a example for the meso gramma discussion thingys? like example, the long track tornado that was in Mississippi 3 years ago (2.25 mile wide one) where the discussion said "a violent tornado with winds of 170-205 mph is ongoing" or another example is the quad state supercell with 2 or 3 mesoscale discussions saying strong/violent. just a discussion cause i don't wanna get my ip banned for reverting back or being a butthole. 66.116.21.158 (talk) 66.116.21.158 (talk) 17:43, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I need to try to find out of the one for Rolling Fork is technically a Meso-gamma discussion. I made a start class article for it (Storm Prediction Center mesoscale discussion 329) since they originally issued it for the wrong storm. If it is, that would cover as an example of one. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 18:15, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I created a list of all 37 of them (List of Storm Prediction Center meso—gamma mesoscale discussions), but some editors do not think we need a list/examples of them, so both the meso—gamma 329 article and the list of all 37 of them were nominated for deletion. If either survive, we have an example or a see-also style thing to link to. Otherwise, the community consensus is no example should be on Wikipedia. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 19:31, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  example for the meso-gramma mesoscale discussion being added in the near future?