Talk:Nagma

message: This page still needs a lot of work, but what it needs most right now is a photo or two of Nagma, and of a movie poster or scene featuring her, which it meets Wikipedia's rules on copyright. Ratufa 21:27, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: is this noteworthy? and is there are any reliable news source?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Itsjustajoy (talk • contribs) 19:08, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  conversion.. 

message: How is Nagma an Indian Chrisitian when she was born of a hindu father and a muslim mother???
Why is she then listed in category of the Indian Chrisitians???India07 (talk) 21:21, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: A recent interview (2014) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HGjSLcpWUTo  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.202.24.2 (talk) 18:41, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indian Christian??? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Nagma. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070407110220/http://www.boxofficeindia.com:80/1990.htm to http://www.boxofficeindia.com/1990.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:51, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Substituted at 00:47, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Nagma. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070526045355/http://www.bhojpurifilmaward.com/results.html to http://www.bhojpurifilmaward.com/results.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081222053918/http://www.smashits.com/video/zoomin/6636/nagma-takes-a-bow.html to http://www.smashits.com/video/zoomin/6636/nagma-takes-a-bow.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060506072028/http://in.news.yahoo.com/040416/43/2cla9.html to http://in.news.yahoo.com/040416/43/2cla9.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:52, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (February 2018) 

message: Please remember for IAbot and archives can often be used to recover dead references; and that if the citation cites a printed work it does not have to have an URL.  Marking such a link as url-status=dead is perfectly fine; Template:dead-link is also not bad.  Adding HTML markup "sup" to simulate an undated citation needed/reason= is an extremely poor choice and disrupts attempts at link recovery.  I am spitting feathers at having just had to go round the houses after recovering such links.  thankyou.  Djm-leighpark (talk) 07:55, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Best practice treatment of dead references 

message: am seeking page protection.Intalk (talk) 08:39, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  note 

message: I've notified Drmies, in their talk page about this today. The current version is not the best one. Instead it is the result of disruptive edits, vandalism, white washing and promotion that happened yesterday. 
* They have removed properly sourced content supported by WP:RS sources like The Telegraph, Outlook, NDTV, etc and replaced it with an obscure non-RS source "NENOW" . 
* They have disruptively changed the birth date of the subject from 1974 to 70 which doesn't match with the inline source that was provided by me. 
* The lead section is puffery ridden now with phrases such as "..such as blockbuster movie Yalgar; ..She began her acting career in Bollywood and acted in a few of the biggest Bollywood movies and in other language... Hat note has been removed too.
* The Personal life section is totally unsourced/OR which writes "Nagma remains unmarried till date. In an interview with The Times of India, she said she would get married when she finds the right man.", but the source  doesn't mention anything about her personal life.
* I have checked and corrected the "Early life" and "Political career" sections. Now many sentences and sections are unsourced/original researches thanks to removal of RS sources like this by  here
:The sourced version was this:
:
:Now we have this unsourced para and complete removal of a sentence:
:
* The only section contentious was the Controversy section, with substantial use of allegedly, which can be discussed and dealt with/removed separately. Anything else can also be ironed out the same way. I believe we should restore it to the last stable version, this one, and then start from there. Pinging . - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:48, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, but the quoted para is still unsourced, even if we do not mention about the half-brothers and her father's liaison.  has also removed sources from the last two paras in the Early life section despite keeping the text more or less the same. I mean, who does that. Just compare the respective sections (Early life, Politics) in the Current version and the Stable version before the edit war. Not to mention the fake/OR birth date as well as totally unsourced/WP:OR/gossipy Nagma#Personal_life section added by Intalk. I've never complained like this before but considering 's lazy and rather disruptive (removal of sources) edits as the 'best version' is shocking. Urging  to take a look at the situation. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 07:49, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Restored valid sources without readding any contentious content, removed unsourced, puffery and original researches as per policies, and unreliably sourced content and sources. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 08:20, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent version and protection as of 10 October 2020 

message: I definitely am trying and literally will by god I swear i am not be a fool of myself because this is a fully protected page. But my question is that why does Nagma have an automated fully protected page? Please answer me.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by MashriqiUser (talk • contribs) 03:24, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[User:MashriqiUser]] 

message: In the 2nd para of "Early Life" there is an ambiguous link to "from National College, Mumbai University." I believe "National College" should wikilink to: R. D. National College.— Rod talk 17:38, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Done — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 20:31, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation needed