lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Friendraising

message: My goodness this is a difficult one to address. In essence it is true, and in essence it is untrue. In truth it is a cynic's view of the matter, pure and simple; Which cynic is born of the uncaring, selfish, self-centred, self interested, and thus unholy mess of a world we as human beings have made and therefore live in.
To be continued...
Raymis (talk) 14:48, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Overall great page. Controversy section could possibly benefit from a historical example of friendraising with ill intent. Has there been any coverage of organizations friendraising to take advantage of the vulnerable?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by BrianJohnNIU (talk • contribs) 17:13, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Review NNGO 350
Talk:Little Orphant Annie

message: poem written by *beloved* Hoosier poet James Whitcomb Riley
The question "Beloved by who?" needs to be answered per WP:AWW  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.53.197.12 (talk) 18:53, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see that that can be inferred from the way the word is used in the article.  Just because he was from Indiana doesn't suggest that his fans have to be.  Pi zero (talk) 12:48, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

text: It's not really a statement that can be supported.  If you don't like it, remove it. 140.247.248.62 (talk) 06:20, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weasel words 

message: I know nothing about this poem/haven't read it, but I have a quick question about the lead.
"Riley changed the name to "Little Orphant Allie" at its third printing, however a typecasting error during printing renamed the poem to its current form." Did the 't' on the end of "orphan" get added as part of the typecasting error, too, or is "orphant" an archaic spelling?--Jp07 (talk) 03:07, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Orphant is correct. I have an edition of Rhymes of Childhood from 1892 that has this same spelling.MichaelJPierce (talk) 03:58, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 
Talk:NPO 3FM

message: I want to update the new program. Between 16 and 18, Frank van der Lende has a program called Frank hartje. The 'hartje' has to be a little heart (smiley) behind it, but the wikipedia won't let me save that.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.132.114.239 (talk) 16:42, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

message: There's this Isle of Man radiostation: 3FM.
Lincoln J. (talk) 10:30, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  THIS REDIRECTION PAGE IS BULLSHIT! 

message: I read through the main parts of the page and found no copyediting needed therefore i deleted the sign but i can not find the category code adding this to the category where pages need copyediting. so someone needs to do that for me or find where it is and tell me so i can remove. Anyyways. Have A Nice Day! Editor123ALOP (talk) 18:49, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  CopyEditing
Talk:Darzhavna Aeroplanna Rabotilnitsa

message: copied from Talk:DAR Aircraft
 This article needs to be split into two articles and rewritten as a DAB page. - Canglesea (talk)      16:07, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: - Canglesea (talk) 02:21, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

text: Now it's done!
Merge - Why have two articles on exactly the same subject?Petebutt (talk) 09:35, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Radio Cardiff

message: Information to be added or removed: schedule section 
Explanation of issue: Major radio schedule change in spring 2020. 
References supporting change: http://radiocardiff.org/?page_id=49 
Zsl11913 (talk) 12:50, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: (edit conflict) Wikipedia articles are not meant to provide things like an up-to-date programming schedule; that should be done on your radio station's website; per WP:NOTDIRECTORY.  The Wikipedia article should almost exclusively summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage state about the subject, not what the subject wants to say about itself. 331dot (talk) 13:21, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Some proposed changes

message: * The specific verbatim claims requested have not been delineated in the request.
* Additionally, the claims that were implied to be added appear to be information on the radio's current schedule format, which is not the purpose of Wikipedia. 
* If an overall format change has occurred, this should be described in a general way in the article. If that is to be done, please supply the verbatim requested text for these general claims. 
Regards,  Spintendo  13:20, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: (edit conflict) Wikipedia articles are not meant to provide things like an up-to-date programming schedule; that should be done on your radio station's website; per WP:NOTDIRECTORY.  The Wikipedia article should almost exclusively summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage state about the subject, not what the subject wants to say about itself. 331dot (talk) 13:21, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Reply 21-JAN-2020

message: From looking at Radio Cardiff, I've spotted quite a few possible issues that you can all look at yourself and possibly change.
* The article still sounds a bit too much like an advertisement or if it is written by the station itself. I make the same mistake myself so this needs to be looked into.
* Many of the reference/source links are invalid (particularly the ones linking to the Radio Cardiff website).
* Possibly more information needed about Studios and News Service sections?
* Some examples of notable presenters, if applicable
* Is the former logo needed and/or does it need its own section? It doesn't seem to fit well in my opinion.
Note, I now have a personal affiliation to the station as I'm an assistant for one of the shows.
Mthowells200130 (talk) 23:41, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Issues with the article
Talk:Chorley FM

message: Who won?  It can't still be going on can it? NtheP (talk) 20:45, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Search for a Star

message: Somebody please delete this third-rate article about a radio station that nobody outside Chorley cares about.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.47.175.123 (talk) 03:16, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable?
Talk:Genevieve Goings

message: Why delete the article on Genevieve Goings and redirect to Choo Choo Soul?  I'm reverting to original article.  If anyone has issue, please discuss here.  Jean15paul (talk) 15:10, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Nevermind ... didn't see the AfD page.  Jean15paul (talk) 15:14, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why? 

message: I'm restoring the redirect to Choo Choo Soul per WP:Articles for deletion/Genevieve Goings. The article hasn't changed  since an IP restored it two years ago . Yappy2bhere (talk) 20:59, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restoring the redirect 

message: IP undeleted and expanded Jan 2013. Not sure whether to remerge. In ictu oculi (talk) 10:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Undeleted again
Talk:Segmentation-based object categorization

message: In the section "The Ncut algorithm" the value "D" is introduced without explanation. Also, none of the "figures" actually occur in the article.
To follow this comment, the "ncut algorithm" section should refer/link to the degree and adjacency matrix of a graph (or even the Laplacian matrix) when defining D and W, as well as the algebraic connectivity of the graph when referencing the second smallest eigenvalue. 70.166.151.52 (talk) 16:42, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Ncut

message: The distinction between this article and Segmentation (image processing) appears unclear. What about either:
* Renaming this article into "Graph-based image segmentation" (or similar), to highlight the focus on graph-based methods, or ...
* Merge this article with Segmentation (image processing), since both deals with the same overall topic?
Any comments? --Fredrik Orderud (talk) 20:47, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename or merge with Segmentation (image processing) 

message: How does one "use the eigenvector with the smallest eigenvalue to bipartition the graph"? Is there another article to which we could link that would provide those details? --76.27.96.159 (talk) 04:29, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bipartitioning a graph with the eigenvector 

message: Hm, there is no "Figures 1-7" 
129.27.201.116 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 09:59, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Example
Talk:Touch Me (arcade game)

message: ...til' I can get my... satisfaction. Anyways, does this article need cleanup? I'm joking. I highly doubt anybody will ever see this lol. Anyways, I'm new, and I can say this is the smallest article to need so many citations I have ever seen.--Retrotails (talk) 04:17, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Touch me?
Talk:Billboard Music Awards

message: I'm curious because Flo Rida had a chance to win in 2008.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Flo Rida's Biggest Fan (talk • contribs) 22:07, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  When will the Billboard Music Awards return? 

message: The Billboard Awards are different from the Billboard YEAR-END-CHARTS. Totally two different things.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.164.114.247 (talk) 08:16, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Billboard Awards

message: Someone could add "#redirect Billboard Music Award#Milestone Award" to Milestone Award. --82.170.113.123 (talk) 03:49, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect 

message: This class creates a new space to recognize new artists entering the music world. The reconociemiento still get a revelation on the Billboard charts.Fron 2011 - Present.Billboard Music Award.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by CodyAngel (talk • contribs) 04:56, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Billboard Music Award for New Artist of the Year 

message: The artist with most wins is not taylor swift, its janet jackson, check her awards on her award wiki page. TeonChap (talk) 05:34, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Most Wins? 

message: This article featured links to PDF and JPG files which were scans of newspaper articles. The PDFs were published on a site other than the newspaper's (or the newspaper publisher's) website. This is copyright violation. While the USA Today itself is a viable source for references, the third-party site that republishes the material without permission is not a viable reference because wikipedia can't use copyvio material.  (See Wikipedia:Copyright violations, which explains that copyvio material should never be linked from the encyclopedia.)
The references can be replaced with any viable reference, including references to the USA Today newspaper where the material originally appeared. -- Mikeblas (talk) 15:57, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio links in references 
Talk:Lissotesta

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 . It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  --Whpq (talk) 18:15, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:List of named passenger trains of Canada

message: What named passenger trains did Grand Trank Pacific Railway operate?  Was there ever a GTPR transcontinental? RPHaskell (talk) 04:33, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: They didn't have a transcon train, as they operated only between Winnipeg and Prince Rupert. The eastern part of the construction project was the NTR, which the GTP was supposed to take over, but they never did. If they had names for any of their passenger trains, I have never seen them. Indefatigable (talk) 15:58, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks.  I noticed that during the same time period both Canadian Pacific Railway and Canadian Northern Railway had several named passenger trains operating in the west.  It seemed odd that the Grand Trunk Pacific Railway wouldn't have any, even after the completion of their line to Prince Rupert.  Any there any existing GTPR timetables from that era available?  Online perhaps? 69.11.67.177 (talk) 16:12, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grand Trunk Pacific Railway
Talk:Carlos Spaht

message: Thanks for doing this article. I had been trying to find info on Mr. Spaht for some time and came up blank, not having access to the 1951-1952 microfilm of newspapers. I will edit it later and try to add things that I do know.
65.116.31.254 (talk) 15:31, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:RAF Spanhoe

message: Hi. Uppingham has never, ever, been in Northamptonshire (Uppingham). The location of the RAF Spanhoe may be in Northamptonshire but Uppingham is most definitely in Rutland - and proud of it! I will try to modify it.
It may be the location string is misleading on the right of the page in that the location details could be misinterpreted.Longfinal (talk) 22:47, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Gavbadger (talk) 19:34, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uppingham in Northamptonshire????!!
Talk:A4060 road

message: This should be moved to A4060 road, but it's blocked by a redirect. --NE2 15:32, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Stephen Markman

message: Suggest that the content about the Michigan Supreme Court be merged with Michigan Supreme Court. --ukexpat (talk) 15:39, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge/Redirect Michigan SC Stuff

message: Will he be the next and good replacement for Comey, FBI chief? - http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/05/16/ann-coulter-conservatives-weigh-in-on-outsider-to-replace-comey/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.63.79.46 (talk) 06:44, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  FBI
Talk:Oxepin

message: Is this compound antiaromtic (and why the epoxide might be favoured)? John Riemann Soong (talk) 19:23, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it slightly deviates from planarity so I think it's not antiaromatic (or at least not as much as it were, were it planar, c.f. cyclobutadiene). Alfa-ketosav (talk) 17:51, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  antiaromatic?
Talk:St Brendan-Shaw College

message: I reliase that it may be an interesting story, but I believe that the 'lockdown' paragraph should be omitted. It does not add anything to the page and makes it seem some what unprofessional. If stories like that were included on every page then Wikipedia would be filled up with non-sense. I propose that the paragrpah about the school lockdown be deleted and I shall do so if no objections are heard within 14 Days. --Pete'sport (talk) 12:32, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lockdown Story
Talk:Southeastern New England AVA

message: According to the USDA Interactive Hardiness Zone Map, the areas in zone 7b are Chatham on Cape Cod and areas of the north and east coasts of Nantucket.   03:49, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mildest areas
Talk:Navarch

message: This article and the one at Nauarchia seem to be about the same topic. There should be only one. For convenience, please make all comments at Talk:Nauarchia#Merger proposal, so all the discussion happens at the same place. Gentgeen (talk) 09:26, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: This article and Navarch seem to be discussing the same topic. There should only be one article. I have no preference regarding which title the article should be at, and which should be a redirect. Gentgeen (talk) 09:23, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, they are indeed about the same subject: "Nauarchos" being "Admiral", "nauarchia" is "admiralship". Me, I would prefer the present article to be merged with the navarch page. BTW, the supposed "Greek" quotes and terms in the present article make no sense at all. Cheers, Constantine   ✍  11:29, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Support. Yea they are talking about the same thing. I think they should be merged into navarch since that one is spelled how you would actually say the word. Grk1011/Stephen (talk) 12:48, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Support per GRK1011.  "Nauarchia" could be incorporated to "Nauarchos" as a section about the history of the title.  However, the present article on "Nauarchia" makes no sense at all.  It looks like someone was collecting references for personal use! Pel thal (talk) 13:29, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved discussion from [[Talk:Nauarchia]]
Talk:Colt 45

message: Colt 45 is a famous bus in Uzbekestan
hell no!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.116.163.19 (talk) 03:34, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Bus

message: For the page move request see Talk:Colt 45 (2014 film). P.I. Ellsworth  ed. put'r there 19:36, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Page move
Talk:Meta-Wiki

message: Please lock this redirect (cf Wikipedia:Wikimedia) 16@r (talk) 16:15, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Please change the redirect to Wikimedia Meta-Wiki. Thanks. Lightsup55 ( T | C ) 17:38, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Protection reduced. --MZMcBride (talk) 18:17, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit protect request 

message: Wikimeta gives no doubt. Can not be confussed with historic MetaWiki, the search engine to find wikis. --BoldLuis (talk) 02:02, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikimeta 

message: , Meta-Wiki is a namespace article, not a welcome page, nor is this website Meta-Wiki, and so this is not allowed. So is this per WP:BRD. What do you think? GeraldWL 14:36, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Namespace
Talk:Martha's Vineyard AVA

message: Sadly, Chicama Vineyards (the only one on Martha's Vineyard) closed in 2008.  ONE DAY, viticulture will resume here. The AVA designation covers any future vineyards on the island. Heff01 (talk) 19:00, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  No vineyards on Martha's Vineyard
Wikipedia talk:Requests for checkuser/Case/Celldea

message: *comment I know that you have a hatred for Japan, but I'm NOT a Sockpuppet. I've already been checked on Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/KoreanShoriSenyou which was requested by you. You are really persistent and unproductive, I'm really sick and tired of your harassment against Japanese editors. What is purpose that you came to Wikipedia for? For fighting with Japanese editors?--W/mint-Talk- 14:04, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: In addition, It is truth that User:FOB coupe is my friend who lives in the same apartment with me. An address and ISP will be same as him. (Of course it isn't ODN, Keio Univ ISP).--W/mint-Talk- 14:16, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

text: *comment: I've known you've hated me so much ever since I encountered you. You behave like a gentleman in front of only admins, but many editors don't think about you in the same way. Regardless of the sockpuppetry, you already broke rules with the meatpuppetry plot here from the Japanese and Commons wiki That is a critical fault of your party. I don't hate Japan or Japanese unlike your assert. I hate any people who disrespect and breach the community rules. I once filed a RFCU file on a seemingly Japanese to everyone but actually Korean editor. I give a warning whenever I meet suspicious people regardless their ethnicity. They were vanished after I said to them not to use sockpuppetry. The previous files were too wide for checkusers to scrutinize who is a sock. So I narrow down the obvious meatpuppeters in this report. You don't deny what you've done at the Japanese Wikipedia, and any relation with Celldea. Why? The editors' pages show who you are and are perfect match. And you know what? I was amazed by the fact that the notorious Korean sockmaster, User:Bason0 past several RFCU files. So have a little patient. I believe my hunch this time again. Japan has a lot of internet cafes, so there will be many ways. --Appletrees (talk) 14:34, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

text: *commentYou admitted that you're a Keio University student here, however, the information is only written on Celldea's user page. At the Japanese site, and your site, none are mentioned on your identity but only Celldea revealed did that. --Appletrees (talk) 14:47, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

text: No. I admit that "I don't use Keio Univ ISP."  It is a refutation toward your comment as "Watermint also seems to use ODN as well but if someone appeared to use Keio University ISP, that is him or his socks, or his meatpuppet friend. "  Your accusation is always being written only by a prejudice and conjecture. --W/mint-Talk- 15:15, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not a checkuser, so can't conclude the truth  by myself. I should avoid using conclusive comments unlike your bare assertions to editors on the other side without any proof. I don't have a prejudice toward you. What I bring up here is possible evidences to prove your possible sockpupetry. All I present is the recorded evidences. --Appletrees (talk) 15:30, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

text: OK,OK, I leave the judgment to the admin. Please keep free. --W/mint-Talk- 15:41, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Jennifer Paull

message: With the present state of the article I don't find that tag justified. So I'll comment out that tag now.
--Reccmo (talk) 20:24, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of Like-a-Resume tag
Talk:Religion in London

message: The percentages of 58.2 + 15.8 + 8.7 + 8.5 + 4.1 + 2.1 + 1.5 + 0.8 + 0.5 = 100.2% Stratman07 (talk) 00:36, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed a long ago. 178.223.198.96 (talk) 05:44, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: 100.2%

message: Article needs mention of Jedi.  Census figures (2001 and 2011) show Jedi / Jedi Knight(s) between the major and minor populations of religions, which are each mentioned.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.142.142.197 (talk) 20:07, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jedi
Talk:Kathleen Foster Campbell

message: Talk: Kathleen Foster Campbell
I am currently adding entries that create a broader context in which Kathleen Foster Campbell's importance will be evident. She was a close friend of Janet Lewis's and sister-in-law to Gladys Campbell. 
Thanks!
Teeping (talk) 16:41, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have recreated the page which was originally created by another - relatively new user User:Teeping I believe (how would I see the history??).  I believe that there is sufficient interest in the poetry scene in Chicago around the time of the formation of Poetry (magazine) to warrant biographical entries for key figures.  And I believe if administrators could refrain from deleting this article for a while, then editors might be able to better establish the notability and context of this article. Stumps (talk) 03:49, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recreation