Talk:Ford Windstar

message: I'm confused with when generation 1.5 occured. I have info. to confirm the front fascia had a minor update for 1998, not 1996. I would appreciate if someone would correct my mistake if I am wrong. Bavaria 21:56, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article mentions that Chrysler introduced the sliding passenger door in 1996. The Nissan Axxess had this back in 1990 (perhaps even earlier).
Chrysler introduced the second sliding door in 1996, a first for mini-vans.
Chrysler introduced the DRIVER side sliding door in the late 90s
minivans have had passenger side sliding doors since the 80s with the first Chrysler Caravan. Ford didn't want to have to completely redesign the windstar so in order to be "competitive" with the double sliding doors, the windstar had bigger front doors. much like a coupe has bigger front doors.
Achang1 (talk) 10:15, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia, driver side sliding door..... 

message: The first generation Windstar was instroduced in the very early 1990s with the same body style as the Aerostar.  The Aerostar was discontinued shortly thereafter.  Ford rushed to produce the Aerostar when they saw the popularity of the Dodge Caravan, knowing that the Aerostar was going to be temporary until they could get a good product on the market - the Windstar.
The Windstar was introduced ~1994/1995 with its first generation body design. The Aerostar was still in the market, mostly as fleet sales, until 1997. The Aerostar was Fords attempt at creating a minivan in 1986. Since they have never done it before, they decided to design it after the Ranger, thats why the Aerostar has the 3.0 vulcan engine and is RWD.
the windstar is also far from a good product, 3.8 headgasket failures, electrical problems, and weak/old AXOD-E transmissions. Achang1 (talk) 10:19, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: In some ways, the article needs to be re-written when it comes to comparing the Aerostar and Windstar.  I'm not speaking from an opinion so much as from facts...the Windstar is NOT smaller than the Aerostar (it's between 11-25" longer, depending on which version of the Aerostar you are comparing it to, and I could go on from there).  Also, while the Aerostar has high parts commonality with Ford's light-truck lineup, it is a unique platform of its own...not some haphazard design some make it out to be.  SteveCof00 (talk) 07:23, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Windstar/Aerostar 

message: I would like to see detailed differences between the 3.0 and 3.8 engines, as well as information on torque, redline, 0-60 times, etc.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.116.223.114 (talk) 05:37, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  3.8L Engine details 

message: Hi, I have a 1995 GL Windstar with damaged 3.8 motor, up to what year motor can I replace in this model? Thanks
Domingoruiz0250 (talk) 16:47, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ford Windstar  

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Ford Windstar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131022233558/http://www.marklines.com/en/report/rep054_200203 to http://www.marklines.com/en/report/rep054_200203
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110430101525/http://media.ford.com/pdf/Dec2002sales.pdf to http://media.ford.com/pdf/Dec2002sales.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090212180838/http://media.ford.com/article_download.cfm?article_id=27379 to http://media.ford.com/article_download.cfm?article_id=27379
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:44, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Ford Windstar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101011135359/http://www.jdpower.com/corporate/news/releases/pdf/2005089.pdf/ to http://www.jdpower.com/corporate/news/releases/pdf/2005089.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120628032657/http://consumerguideauto.howstuffworks.com/2004-to-2007-ford-freestar.htm to http://consumerguideauto.howstuffworks.com/2004-to-2007-ford-freestar.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120904222647/http://nhthqnwws111.odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/acms/docservlet/Artemis/Public/Pursuits/2009/INVMTY-082009-1234.pdf to http://nhthqnwws111.odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/acms/docservlet/Artemis/Public/Pursuits/2009/INVMTY-082009-1234.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:07, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified