lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Herbert Druce

message: The date of death seems to refer to Herbert Druce, upholsterer, who was involved with the "Duke of Portland" estate case. I can't find any evidence that the entomologist and the upholsterer were the same person. https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/241836996 (the last item "Druce case recalled".) ghouston (talk) 03:42, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Herbert Druce, upholsterer
Talk:Bugyō

message: It appears that the list in this article identifies Edo period bugyō; but at some point, the article might be expanded to includemore specific information about pre-Tokugawa shogunate officials?  If so, this would become relevant:
* In 1434, Ashikaga Yoshinori established the Tosen-bugyō to regulate foreign affairs.Kinihara, Misako. The Establishment of the Tosenbugyo in the Reign of Ashikaga Yoshinori" (唐船奉行の成立 : 足利義教による飯尾貞連の登用), Tokyo Woman's Christian University: Essays and Studies. Abstract.
:Kinihara, Misako. The Establishment of the Tosenbugyo in the Reign of Ashikaga Yoshinori" (唐船奉行の成立 : 足利義教による飯尾貞連の登用), Tokyo Woman's Christian University: Essays and Studies. Vol. 44, No. 2, pp. 27-53.
I hope this link becomes useful at some point. --Tenmei (talk) 17:44, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see why we shouldn't include it now... That's a really interesting discovery. Do you have any info, from that article or elsewhere, that says when/why/how the position ceased to exist? And congrats on the name change. I like it. LordAmeth (talk) 21:34, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Muromachi bugyō

message: Random chance led me to find these plausibly well-informed charts.  Although the reference source which informs each chart image is not made clear in the image description data, the alternate view of relationships is worth noting here ... perhaps worth further investigation?  perhaps not? --Tenmei (talk) 23:33, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Alternative conceptual view of hierarchy relationships
Talk:IJVM

message: As far as i can see, the IJVM according to Structured Computer Organization is intended to be an example ISA, not an assembly language example... 62.16.202.116 14:13, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

message: I see simulators have been added to the external links section.
I would like to add another such toolkit (including a simulator, an assembler and an assembler for the lower-level MIC-1 microcode), however I have a WP:Conflict of interests because I am the author of it.
Please, add it if you believe it's appropriate.
LjL (talk) 15:33, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Other simulator and toolkit
File talk:Winniethepooh.png

message: Can we find a copy without that glaring white pixel on the mouth? The Wednesday Island 14:36, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

message: When the fair use rationale and image template have been removed by vandalism, it seems a little harsh then to mark the page for deletion and remove it from the associated article for "no fair use rationale". Why not just revert the vandalism, back to the previous version? --Old Moonraker (talk) 08:29, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: Did not see that fair use rationale removal was vandalism.  My mistake. Thanks for pointing it out. Fastily (talk) 00:17, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes
Talk:Trollope

message: I’ve moved some of the opening statement to here for discussion.
The whole is unsourced, and anonymous;
The first part may well be correct, but it needs a source; a dictionary of English surnames should substantiate it.Swanny18 14:54, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I’ve checked a Dictionary of Surnames, and it says the name is derived from the place-name Trolhop (Norse: Troll Valley) so I’ve put that in the article with the source. The other suggestion I’ve left for now, to see if a source turns up.Swanny18 15:45, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: gazetteer.org.uk does not know of any Troughburn, or Trolhope, or Trollhope or Trollope.
I will take out the geographic reference unless someone can come up with proof Troughburn exists. Arrecife (talk) 23:23, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Please don't remove cited material just because you can't find a place. DuncanHill (talk) 23:47, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

text: It's given in The Place-names of Northumberland and Durham by Allen Mawer here. DuncanHill (talk) 23:51, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Dubious

message: To whoever at 128.243.220.42(University of Nottingham) who has deleted a big chunk of this without any explanation; I’ve put it back until the change is explained or some reason can be given
And to whoever at 86.137.86.206( ? Southport) who added the stuff in the first place; I know I asked for citations, so I only have myself to blame I suppose, but can you be more specific?
The first link is to a 200 word essay on something obscure; can you give a page number?I really don’t want to read the whole thing.
I should apologize at this point; I forgot to put in page numbers for my citations; I’ll do it next time I’m in the library ( though they are both indexed under Trollope, if you’d like to check).
The second is to a website that appears to be selling coats of arms to Americans; it’s the source of the information I felt was dubious in the first place, for the reasons given above.
Third, the reference for the occurrence of the name "Trois Loups" in the Domesday book is given as - the Domesday book (!); do you have a place-name or something? That would be convincing, if so.
Fourth, the bit about dyslexia; is that your own idea, or is it from somewhere else? If it’s yours, that be regarded as original research, I think, which is a bit frowned upon. If it’s from something published, that really should be cited, so it can be verified.
Lastly, I’ve separated out the bit I wrote, as it looked as if the bit you’d added was cited in the book, which really isn’t the case.
Swanny18 12:34, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No replies; deletions follow. Swanny18 16:39, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent Edits ( Aug-Sept 2007)
Talk:Astor Theatre, Melbourne

message: Removed the following line from the final section of the article: 'The closure and departure of the tenant at the end of his lease will allow the owner to carry out the restorations that are badly needed to the interior of the theatre.' It was deemed to be a very subjective statement as it lacked citation, and Wikipedia should remain as free of bias as possible. Included reference to current (as of Dec. 2014) uncertainty on whether or not the Astor Theatre will indeed be closing; information should be updated to reflect the outcome. ForrestMoss (talk) 13:23, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: General Edits

message: I've just redirected Astor Theater to this page - the previous content of that page was:
:The Astor Theatre was founded by John Jacob Astor IV, a victim of the RMS Titanic. It is located in the Melbourne suburb of Windsor in Victoria, Australia.
I haven't merged that info in because I can't find a citation for it.  If anyone can find a reference it should be added.-Hunting dog (talk) 22:10, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Info from other article
Talk:Margolis Brown Adaptors Company

message: Hello, Zena0727 asked that I come give some comments on this due to some suggestions I made during the last AfD debate. For anyone working on this article, I'd recommend you focus on:
*Adding internal references to show what information comes from where. Along the same lines, find some online resources if possible so as to give a more accessible background.
*Working on the prose to remove some of the non-neutrality from the article. The article is much better than it used to be and no longer reads blatantly biased or like an advertisement, but could still use a little help in the NPOV department. Note that some of that can be improved by adding the internal citations mentioned above. If it's cited somewhere, it's a little more credible.
*Some more blue links could be nice.
*Always look for more information about the company itself. Right now, half of the article is about the Margolis Method, which while relevant, isn't what the article is about. Try to find more information about the company, such as detailed history, notable players, common themes in their performances, etc.
If I were to assess this article as it currently stands, I'd say it would be a Start-Class article, and will indicate as such on the WikiProject Banner above. Hopefully, that banner will attract the attention of WikiProject Theatre, who should be able to provide some help with improving the article. Best of luck! Hersfold (talk/work) 14:48, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested comments 

message: As one of the editors who voted for deletion, I would like to say that this article has been improved deeply. James Luftan  contribs 02:37, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Improvment

message: Hello!
I'd love some feedback on the page from some wiki vets.  I've looked over the previous feedback/comments and tried to improve on the page given the info there.
Also I'd be curious how to up this page on Quality & Importance scales.
Thanks!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by StJustus (talk • contribs) 00:38, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updates/Scales 
Talk:Turriff

message: ?????  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.106.147.144 (talk) 23:31, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: It would be helpful if someone could explain why refusing to pay National Insurance results in a statue of a cow. Afterbrunel (talk) 20:00, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Reason for the coo?
Talk:Jean-Pierre Hébert

message: Jean-Pierre Hebert  Give the basic
details of each (title of the artwork, name of the artist, technique used, year
created). Briefly explain how the following principles of art (line, shape, color,
value, form, texture, space) 49.146.44.1 (talk) 18:47, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Art
Talk:European Classification

message: What does ECLA stand for?  This needs to be included.Curb Chain (talk) 06:06, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it stands for "European Classification". I have just added a note in the article. --Edcolins (talk) 10:58, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  ECLA
Talk:Gander (horse)

message: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UN2bG90Qxdc  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.148.32.193 (talk) 17:27, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Mein Ek Din Laut Kay Aaoon Ga

message: I've removed the plot section because obviously this film hasn't been released yet.
I've removed the non-free image gallery because this isn't permitted on Wikipedia. --Tony Sidaway 15:04, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: gallery removed a second timeSkierRMH 20:30, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot and image gallery
Talk:Robert Brout

message: I created this article on 2007/08/06. You can make contributions by adding more information. RS1900 15:11, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Robert Brout
Talk:The X-Files/Archive 4

message: One factor that I think can separate the X-Files from other science fiction television series is that a good deal of the episodes take their "supernatural" element not only from original science-fiction concepts, but directly from traditional folklore, mythology and superstition. I noticed that this is not mentioned in the article. Is there a place in which it would be appropriate to include this? Is it relevant? Does it need a citation? I thank you for your help.
71.190.8.54 17:35, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ideally you should find a source referring to this, yes. And yes, I think it is relevant. -- Beardo 22:39, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The supernatural aspect of the show is already right up front in the first paragraph to clarify it's not pure science fiction, there's also a lot of mention of religious themes, and enough of the folklore-based episode subjects are mentioned that anyone would get the idea. You're right though, with the text this long, the word "folklore" should probably be included somewhere in the article. 172.163.15.111 06:20, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Folklore and Mythology

message: Most of the web references in this article are a mess. They contain dates and author information, but they're all formatted manually with italics and links etc, instead of using the standardized  template. Help improve the article's quality by converting the existing ref tags to their standardized form. The article has been nominated for being featured and the messy references will hinder that. See Template:Citeweb and Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/The X-Files.  Equazcion 22:02, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've begun converting these refs as part of a massive revamp of the article. I've gotten through roughly half of the references that needed fixing, so there are still a lot more. Feel free to help out with the effort. See Template:Citeweb for info on making the standardized citations. If everyone fixes one or two citations that would probably take care of them all... Equazcion 21:54, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference cleanup

message: Someone changed it to 202 episodes today and I changed it back. A bit later someone changed it to 202 again and added a "reference" to tv.com. So which one should we use? Personally, I prefer 201 since that's the number of episodes aired and the number released on DVD. The fact that they cut up the last one in two for repeats and sales to other stations shouldn't factor into it. If people still want to go with 202, a better reference would be needed. Tv.com changes the number of episodes based on how they're available on iTunes. Just look at the Battlestar Galactica (2003) mini-series... Davhorn 23:26, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point. I didn't notice that the 202 number was due to the last episode being split. I think the number should be based on how many originally aired. I'm changing it back. Equazcion 23:50, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 201 or 202?
Category talk:Controversies

message: I thought this category was deleted. Why was it deleted and why was it recreated? --Jagz 15:13, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know the history properly, but the category was involved in a July 2007 CfD discussion of :Category:Debates which I initiated; I found after doing so that there had also been a much earlier (Jan 2006) discussion of :Category:Debates. Hope that illuminates.Dsp13 20:45, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

text: I also remember proposing this category for CfD at some point - the only reason I have it on my watchlist. I can't recall the result, but I'm pretty sure it was "keep" (and the dude abides...). Dahn 22:36, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion and recreation 

message: There was a discussion. The result was: Keep. Stefanomione 16:19, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Didn't someone delete it?  See  --Jagz 17:10, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion 

message: * It seems to me like one could usefully distinguish between "controversies" -- i.e., specific controversies, like incidents of fraud or scandals -- and "controversial topcis", like "abortion", "animal rights", "race and intelligence".  I would argue for reserving this category, :Category:Controversies, only for the former (synonymous perhaps with "controversial incidents"), and creating some new category (if warranted) to include all those "controversial topics".  That would help in diffusion.  Because otherwise, honestly, everything could fit in here.  History.  Science.  Ethics.  There is no field of human knowledge or endeavor that is not a "controversial topic".  --Lquilter (talk) 22:52, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  scope of this category
Category talk:Indian castes

message: It is sub-cast of Chauhan.
They are found in Rajasthan, Punjab and Haryana. Abid037 (talk) 07:22, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ketaissar 

message: C. Chaurasia 49.14.157.239 (talk) 15:28, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chaurasia is also caste in India 

message: bharat garnel category 2402:8100:3941:F16:907C:3117:A078:AA0F (talk) 11:48, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bharat garnel category
Talk:Illegal per se

message: Within the article, there is the phrase "The court carefully narrowed the per se treatment. . ."
From the context, "THE court", as well as mentioning that it narrowed a ruling, it sounds like the original author was referring to the United States Supreme Court.  If this is so, than the word "court" should be capitalized since it is a proper noun in that context. (i.e. The Court. . .)
Or, perhaps, it would be better to spell it out completely, (The Supreme Court), to render it less ambiguous?
What say ye?
Jim (JR)
Jharris1993 (talk) 00:50, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does this refer to the Supreme Court?
Talk:FWA Tag Team Championship

message: How can this article be called the XWA Tag Team Championship when the titles were vacated in 2006, the year before XWA was founded and have never been contested for since? Tony2Times (talk) 13:36, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It should be moved back, as the XWA never ended up using it in the end, and now FWA is back maybe they will actually get used again. --- Paulley (talk) 16:18, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  XWA? 
Talk:GHC Junior Heavyweight Tag Team Championship

message: The current champion Alpha Wolf is new caracter of luchador El Hijo de Canis Lupus. 2804:2088:C6:400:0:0:0:1 (talk) 2804:2088:C6:400:0:0:0:1 (talk) 16:20, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current champion
Talk:Brewers Droop

message: A Brewers Droop album has circulated featuring Dave Edmunds, but it isn't clear what his role was with the band. Perhaps someone who knows can put that into the article. Nicmart (talk) 13:45, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dave Edmunds 

message: The following was entered on the main page - I've moved it from there to here:    Hogyn Lleol (talk) 20:29, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Query on dates 

message: Was their name Brewers Droop or Brewer's Droop ? The article is titled the former but generally uses the latter. -- Beardo (talk) 00:14, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: In summer 1973 we casually passed through a free concert given in Durham across the footpath alongside the wide grassy banks of the River Wear next to the racecourse. At the time there was a guitarist on stage leading proceedings wearing blue jeans and a white T shirt playing a series of shortish blues guitar solos with pauses between. We stopped a while and I was quietly blown away by it all.  It started drizzling and we had to get back to college for a meal.  From a promotional poster in the college JCR we already knew Brewers Droop (knowing snigger) were part of the free concert.  So looking back and putting it all together that could only have been Mark Knopfler.  Stuffed Cat (talk) 13:34, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Free Concert in Durham
Talk:Criminal conspiracy

message: First, the article only briefly mentions in passing how most European countries (outside the U.K.) do not traditionally recognize the crime of "criminal conspiracy", and even now only do so AFAIK in some limited situations relating to international law not under their respective domestic laws. We should make this fact more prominent in the article and if possible (as in reliable sources can be found on the subject) discuss why they have largely rejected having a laws relating to "crime conspiracy". Second, someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe that for a criminal conspiracy to have taken places Both U.K. and U.S. law that their needs to the actual intent at some  point to commit a crime by the all those involved and that so long as the intent was there at some point then even if no further steps ever take place to follow through it's still a crime. This means that it would not be a "crime of conspiracy" if a group of people sat around discussing hypothetically how they might commit a crime together such as say robing a bank but with the clear understanding during the whole discussion that they would never actually go through with the crime in real life. Now of course I'm not sure how conspiracy law would apply where one person mistakenly thought the another person was serious about committing a crime together, while the other simply took it as a hypothetical or joke with no intent of committing said crime, such as in the plot to Alfred Hitchcock's film "Strangers on a Train" (I'm assuming here that because not all parties did not actually "an agreement" even if one mistakenly thought so that only the one who followed through would be guilty under U.K. and U.S. law (if that's not the case then let's clarify that in the article.). Basically, we could be more clear in the article that "an agreement" in this context does not include simply a "hypothetical plan" since no Mens rea is present given that there was never any actually "agreement that a course of conduct be pursued" merely hypothesizing as to what said "course of action" might look like if they ever were serious about committing such a crime. --Notcharliechaplin (talk) 16:05, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some issues with the article to fix 

message: Please talk this topic 79.121.73.241 (talk) 06:41, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ekibastuz Kokshetsu 1150 kv transmission line 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved to criminal conspiracy and civil conspiracy. per discussion consensus, WP:NATDIS, and consensus-via-compromise. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 22:03, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 3 November 2022
Talk:Master and Servant Act 1889

message: I oppose the proposed merger. I think that I could make an equally good case for merger into Statute Law Revision Act (this Act is indexed under "statute law revision" in the Public General Acts 1889, HMSO, 1889, and its preamble expresses it to be passed for that purpose). Since no one has expressed any interest in the merger proposal, I am going to remove the tag,  James500 (talk) 18:50, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Any Given Saturday

message: Needs in-line certs to be a C candidate. Tigerboy1966 (talk) 12:22, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment