Talk:START I

message: Apparently in 2001 Russia filed a complaint stating that the United States was violating the START I treaty by not only failing to decomission the required amount of warheads but by actually producing more. This has since been corrected but I think it would make a valuble addition to the article if anyone can find the American defence to these claims. I have found the Russian statement but the American Defence has not yet been found.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.230.60.79 (talk • contribs) Dec 19, 2005
: I remember seeing Department of Energy contracts for manufacturing tritium because the START treaty actually mandates levels of the size of the arsenal. Left to age, most nuclear warheads will degrade since tritium has a half life of about a decade. So, the start treaty actually required the DOE manufacture tritium to keep the weapons operational (and/or at the designed yield?). I believe this was a common complaint about the START treaty in the years after it's ratification in 1991. Jeff Carr (talk) 17:09, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Russia's complaint

message: I'm trying to work on articles to do with the legality of nuclear weapons; drop me a message at my talk page if you want to help. --Jim (Talk) 00:11, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Legality of nuclear weapons

message: Wouldn't it be better to split off Expiration and renewal section and create a new article? The upcoming treaty is by no means prolongation of an old one but brand-new treaty. In Russian Wiki, it's just like that: :ru:СНВ-III. --Парс (talk) 19:39, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Renewal

message: As an aside, only 193 B-52Gs were built. The balance of the 365 aircraft were older variants that had long been retired to AMARC but could have been reactivated if necessary 130.88.99.217 (talk) 09:13, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: B-52Gs

message: Has anybody else noticed about 3 of the picture captions are in German/French...? This is English Wikipedia, right? Anybody want to translate those?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.102.122.11 (talk) 22:21, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Binksternet (talk) 22:47, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Captions 

message: Since as far as I know most H - Bombs are initiated by A - Bombs to energize the hydrogen and start it's fusion; I wonder what was done with the old uranium and plutonium detonaters once the missiles were decommissioned. Since weapons grade is about 80% U 235 and civilian reactors only use about 20% U 235 it hardly seems that it could have been used for civilian power generation.JeepAssembler (talk) 19:40, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where Did The old fissile material go? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on START I. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080323112510/http://www.cnn.com:80/SPECIALS/cold.war/experience/the.bomb/route/06.amarc/ to http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/cold.war/experience/the.bomb/route/06.amarc/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:40, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The key section of history is missing.  The "Negotiations" section jumps from "Strategic Defense Initiative program in 1983 was viewed as a threat by the Soviet Union, and the Soviets withdrew from setting a timetable for further negotiations"... and then goes to the next section, where implementation is discussed. Somewhere in there the Soviets must have agreed to negotiate, and I assume the treaty actually wassigned... what happened? When? Michael-Zero (talk) 03:14, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  History is missing 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on START I. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120503060154/http://www.cdi.org:80/russia/johnson/2008-Archive-040108-START.cfm to http://www.cdi.org/russia/johnson/2008-Archive-040108-START.cfm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:22, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on START I. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090718224210/http://140.194.76.129/publications/eng-pamphlets/ep870-1-49/start.pdf to http://140.194.76.129/publications/eng-pamphlets/ep870-1-49/start.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:33, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified