Talk:I'm a Celebrity...Get Me Out of Here! (British TV series)

message: Given how quickly Pop Idol and Who wants to be a millionaire? spread around the world, I doubt that this programme, which has a similar feel to it, is limited to only the UK, US and Germany. Anyone know if its on elsewhere? Pete/Pcb21 (talk) 17:02, 13 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Only France has since launched it, but that's because of similarities to Survivor. Digifiend 10:00, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The show was also shown  in The Netherlands (in 2004 and 2005 if I'm not mistaken) see the official site (in Dutch) here I've added this. Uhro87 08:54, 8 Oct 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Globality

message: ive no idea how to do them so im putting this here...there needs to be more redirects...i didnt know this article existed until i saw there was a link from it on george bests page. it needs some sort of redirect for someone searching "im a celebrity" at the very least. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.0.224.126 (talk • contribs) 2005-11-27 19:50:18.
: See Wikipedia:Tutorial, and in particular WP:R. There are already heaps of redirects for this page, and searching for "I'm a Celebrity" will show you many of them. I've added two more (by creating the article and putting "#REDIRECT I'm a Celebrity, Get Me Out of Here!" as the content. When you leave comments on pages remember to sign them using four tildes, ~~~~. Thanks/wangi 20:05, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirects

message: Any link to the outcome of this case? The Survivor article says I'm a celeb won it.--Shtove 15:10, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survivor court case

message: I added a quick explanation of the 'red-button', I live in the UK and I had to think for a few seconds what it was on about, I'm sure international readers wouldnt have had a clue! 87.127.25.131 14:26, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Red button

message: The names I just put on were expressly mentioned on the Phil and Fern show yesterday and are also rumoured to be on the show just like the others. They are all rumours at this point in time. We won't actually know who is going into the jungle for another few days, so either we should leave all these people on the page for now or take them any or all speculation off til the actual announcements are made.
:Remove them all, rumours don't meet WP:RS, and neither do "teasers" (what ever that might be). Remember Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Thanks/wangi 16:16, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: However consider WP:RS - two of the names have references and these refs are from a reliable source (I think). /wangi 16:18, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Just a quick note

message: The above says it all. Fin. (Willieboyisaloser 17:01, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations desperately needed! 

message: Could we cover this year's series more in-depth, a bit like this year's Big Brother series. Jinxed - talk 22:02, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  More in-depth this year 

message: Do we really need a extensive list for the Bushtucker Trials for series 7? There are no mention of Bushtucker Trials for Series 1-6? Why should we have Bushtucker trial recaps if they are not mirrored in the other series? Strictly Come Dancing does it, but posters have been updating the page for a few years now.?-- 69.90.207.148 (talk) 21:45, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bushtucker trials for Series 7? 

message: Do you think we should try and cover some of the Dutch versions?--Hiltonhampton (talk) 19:12, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, as there have not been any versions of I'm A Celebrity in Holland. There was a similar show called Bobo's in the Bush, but this was a different format that the broadcaster obtained from Endemol. Worldofbb (talk) 20:41, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: But in the main intro it states that as the Dutch version of the show.--Hiltonhampton (talk) 21:47, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dutch 

message: Should we still record the trials that the public don't vote for--Hiltonhampton (talk) 22:00, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bushtucker trials

message: :Image:ITVCelebrity.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:05, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:ITVCelebrity.jpg

message: Biggins was famous for more than just doing, that is =k'fvolhas been doing lately but he worked on a lot of television programmes and films.  It should say actor.  Here is his IMDB page.  http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0081811/.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.96.165.7 (talk) 11:43, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Famous for

message: Introduced in the 2007 series Cooly123 (talk) 15:32, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bush battles  

message: =series?Cooly123 (talk) 15:33, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fees and rumors  

message: Can someone find the ratings for all series, especially the opening show and the finals. and place them in their respected sections.  
Also series 1-6 need more information in leui of series 7 and 8 pages.Cooly123 (talk) 15:33, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ratings  

message: The image :File:IACGMOOH logo.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here.  In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.  Please check
:* That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
:* That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --03:29, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Image copyright problem with File:IACGMOOH logo.png

message: Needs a seperate page, any information is greatly needed and with a second season possible starting in mid 2009 the time is now.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cooly123 (talk • contribs) 21:52, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  American series  

message: American series 2 is starting in June 2009, the offical website is up too.  Any rumored contestants should be mentioned as well.  comment added by Cooly123 (talk • contribs) 00:30, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  More information 

message: Can we place the orignial series logo back into the pages for series 1-7?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cooly123 (talk • contribs) 00:07, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo 

message: On the website of AOL on November 27 2010, it was announced that the contestants do not stay in a real jungle but in place with its own postal address, and that the crocodiles were made of latex. Any one who has more in-depth knowledge of such criticisms of the series could add it here. ACEOREVIVED (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It is all real --MSalmon (talk) 10:06, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Is this programme a fake?

message: Perhaps a list of sponsors from the run of the show could be added?--TangoTizerWolfstone (talk) 22:35, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sponsors 

message: Here are the voting figures (Coachtripfan (talk) 20:22, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: They are already in the series 14 article page. But thanks anyway. --MSalmon (talk) 20:28, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Voting figures 2014 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on I'm a Celebrity...Get Me Out of Here! (UK TV series). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131113105211/http://www.officialantanddec.com/videos-tv/view/Behind%20the%20Scenes%20at%20the%20Jungle%20Camp-90 to http://www.officialantanddec.com/videos-tv/view/Behind%20the%20Scenes%20at%20the%20Jungle%20Camp-90
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:54, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: At the minute it shows the camp mates as Jungle celebs and City celebs based on their first challenge, but there was no split in camp. Surely this section should only exist when the camp is split into two like a lot of previous series? There is no need for this section this year. Last year is the same. There was no split, so there is no need for the section. I tried to remove it but an IP continued to re-add it. ThisIsDanny (talk) 22:01, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Camp split 

message: I'd like to raise the question of how these are written. The versions used in this main article are different to those used in the series article and different again to those used on-screen as part of the lower thirds. I know that this is certainly the case for the current series, Series 17 and I haven't checked others. At the very least the articles should be consistent with each other and I think that using our own definition of what people are known for may constitute original research so using the phrasing used on-screen would probably be the best way forward.
The boss 1998 (talk) 17:14, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Known for column in tables 

message: Please tell me how the disputed edit does not violate WP:TVGUIDE. "We" are Wikipedia and its editors, and we are not here to provide convenience. You yourself admit that it violates the given guideline, . -- AlexTW 00:19, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I did not admit that this violates the guideline? No where in what I said did I say that that violates the guideline and nowhere in the WP:TVGUIDE does it say ‘Do not provide a link to the most recent series so reader don’t get confused’. DonutsAndBakewells (talk) 00:22, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  You did. You said it's there to provide users with a easy link to the newest series. That's the definition of making this website a guide, read it again: . "Broadcaster", programme, same rules apply. Also, I just realized that it's an actual policy, not a guideline, and thus must be followed. -- AlexTW 00:36, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

text:  Your reply is expected, else your silence will be considered consensus and the content will be removed. For what it's worth, this version, where the draft was linked, most definitely violates MOS:LINKSTYLE, in which drafts should never be linked to from the article space: . -- AlexTW 12:32, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

text:  One answer is here is not "discussed". If you continue to revert, you will be reported to the administrative noticeboard. -- AlexTW 23:30, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Doesn’t violate th WP:TVGUIDE. Why on Earth are you only reverting the I’m a celebrity link? Millions of television shows all over the world have the link to the current/most recent series at the top of the page. If so, you’ve got a lot of work to do my darling! Night x DonutsAndBakewells (talk) 23:33, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Did you even read TVGUIDE? I cited exactly what it violates. And I'm not the only editor reverting, another has taken action as well, and I'll happily remove them all. -- AlexTW 23:35, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Upcoming series 

message: Is it possible to protect the page so only confirmed users can edit? I've noticed that the same IP has persistently vandalised the page and I don't think anyone has reported them. (I've also put in a request for P.P on the admin page). L1amw90 (talk) 01:39, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for page protection

message: Under bushtucker trials it lists the celebrities in the inner circle. Nick and James are not in the inner circle as they were not chosen by Noel after the bushtucker trial so they were available to be voted for in the Drown and Out trial. Gardenshed95 (talk) 15:37, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: According to the page's protection level you should be able to edit the page yourself. If you seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details.  Spintendo  19:07, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 23 November 2018 

message: The following articles linked to this article have been nominated for deletion, pending a discussion surrounding all nominees. Editors seeking to determine how best to proceed in this matter should please visit the relevant AfD for more information:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I'm a Celebrity...Get Me Out of Here! (British series 1)
GUtt01 (talk) 21:35, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomination for Deletion Discussion - Series 1-19 articles 

message: Season articles for this programme at present contain a selection of information pertaining to each series of I'm a Celebrity...Get Me Out of Here! (British TV series), but what information should be in it and the general style/presentation is now a major question. There are three areas with problems - the result and elimination tables; information on challenges; and lack of episode listing. Questions regarding each are listed below. Please respond to each with either a Yes or No, followed by reason for answer. GUtt01 (talk) 21:53, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: what is your brief and neutral statement? At over 3,000 bytes, the statement above (from the  tag to the next timestamp) is far too long for  to handle, and so it is not being shown correctly at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Media, the arts, and architecture. The RfC will also not be publicised through WP:FRS until a shorter statement is provided. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 12:29, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: It is far from neutral. It is written by an editor who has a current AFD to delete the entire series of 20 articles and this RFC appears more worded as a instruction with statements such as "Why didn't someone consider the possibility it was poorly designed" and "added in by editors who are too enthusiastic". WP:Be Bold springs to mind! Leaky caldron (talk) 14:20, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  I would, but I'd rather get people's opinions on this to at least see what others think! I don't want to change things until I'm certain that others share a similar viewpoint on the matter. GUtt01 (talk) 16:42, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

text: Unclear and/or premature. GUtt01 I recommend withdrawing the RFC. RFCs are generally for resolving a clearly defined existing conflict. I suggest you either just jump in and start making improvements, or just post your plans/concerns without an RFC tag if you want to check with article-watchers first. My general thoughts: This article and the season articles are poorly sourced and have too much indiscriminate trivia - for example I just deleted an entire section from this article. The tables can probably be improved. I don't think we need expanded the challenge info, and Episode Listings seems like overkill. Alsee (talk) 13:49, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:   Why is there an RfC here when you have already created an AFD? The suggestion of a RfC was mentioned in the context of being an alternative to the AfD (The AFD is completely unfounded since each season passes WP:GNG). I agree that article content can be challenged - but why would anyone participate here when your AfD threat is hanging over the articles? Also, will you please stop removing edits from other contributors who are critical of your actions? WP:TPO is clear on refactoring / removing others' edits. Improving articles is something that we should all be concerned with but seeking to delete an entire series seems inconsistent with that aim. Leaky caldron (talk) 13:55, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for Comment - Season Article Content 

message: Please respond here with suggestions and discussions to this question: Are the layouts of the table okay? If not, how could they be improved? GUtt01 (talk) 22:11, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Result & Voting Tables 

message: Please respond here with suggestions and discussions to this question: Is this information within the scope of general interest? GUtt01 (talk) 22:11, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Challenge Information 

message: Please respond here with suggestions and discussions to this question: Should we have episode listings within season articles for this programme? GUtt01 (talk) 22:11, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode Listings 

message: Could someone please edit the details of series 19 as the show has now finished for this year? 92.21.79.99 (talk) 17:04, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Series 19 

message: The article lists Beverly as 10th and Victoria as 9th, they were both eliminated on the same night.
This link from ITV says that Victoria was the 3rd to leave, Victoria should therefore be 10th and Beverley 9th. There are no other sources that explicitly state the order of elimination but this: https://www.itv.com/imacelebrity/articles/victoria-is-the-third-celeb-to-leave-the-castle  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.8.44.162 (talk) 13:27, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beverley / Victoria finishing order 

message: I have been really enjoying this series. The last ones in Wales were miserable and cut short. Finally, there are a decent selection of celebrities and I want to watch. But I am so fed up of watching Matt Hancock doing all of the trials. Yes. He messed up. But I’m pretty sure every celebrity in there has at some point.
My point…celebrity’s shouldn’t be allowed to do more than 2 challenges in a row. Bored.com!!! 81.129.120.109 (talk) 23:15, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bored of watching same celebrity do challenge! 

message: The "Created by" section is not accurate. Four people are recognized as having created the original format by ITV - Natalka Znak, Brent Baker, Stewart Morris and Jim Allen. Richard Cowles, Alex Gardner and Mark Cowley have worked on the production but did not create or develop the format. Goonerjag (talk) 14:21, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. MadGuy7023 (talk) 20:13, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 28 November 2022 

message: I think there should be a list of participants who said the phrase "I'm a celebrity get me out of here" during a task. I believe the reason for the show title is the participants want to avoid saying that phrase. I also think there should be a list of participants who quit their tasks without using the phrase. (78.17.191.243 (talk) 18:28, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The phrase 

message: Is myleene glass simple 77.75.244.19 (talk) 22:15, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'm a celebrity africa 

message: Series overview start date 19 November Tbrookes.23 (talk) 11:58, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. M.Bitton (talk) 16:52, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 6 November 2023 

message: Instead of reading like some public relations press release, might not this article say that this is a nasty game show that plays to the worst side of viewers nature?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.149.166.242 (talk) 10:26, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  I Am a (would-be) Celebrity -  Get Me a Contract! 

message: Jamie Lynn was on the Home team not the away team. FraezyWaezy (talk) 18:31, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: MSalmon (talk) 18:47, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 29 November 2023 

message: The final starts with three celebrities. The article should explain if one round of voting determines the ranking of those three or if the day's voting determines who is third and then a short voting round whilst the programme airs decides the winner. Perhaps this has altered over the serieses. Ralph Corderoy (talk) 16:55, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Voting during the final