lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ermine Street

message: What about the Ermine Street Guard (a group of roman reinactors)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.244.7.247 (talk) 22:58, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Following the Time Team broadcast locating the road at Cheshunt well to the west of the road cited, and checking the wider map, it's clear that it does not pass through Ponders End at all, but through Southbury: the junction of the A10 and the Southbury Road in Enfield may actually be somewhere near it. This is simply one sample which showed this article is not of high quality.
Can you therefore kindly stop using the modern road system as a reference, and connect the known sections, please? One viable wiki of far greater precision is , and I would suggest you approach the owners for the right to use their data, which is in any case in the public domain as the road was built many centuries ago!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.254.68.69 (talk) 15:00, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quality improvement needed, please
Talk:List of largest South Australian schools

message: I have created "List of Largest South Australian Schools" page. 
I have done this by using information provided by the Department of Education SA, and wikipedia school pages and school webpage information. 
If there is a school that wasn't on that list, or a school that isn't on this list with a large enrolment figure, feel free to put it in the table and cite your refrence. If any of the enrolment figures are wrong, please let me know :) Also, feel free to expand it. I have done extensive research, lol.
Jobers (talk) 06:26, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  SA's largest schools 

message: Personally I don't think this article should be merged with "List of south Australian Schools." 
That list is already too long, and I thought it might be interesting for people to see how big their school is on a seperate page. 
Jobers (talk) 06:31, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging
Talk:Ocean pout

message: I made some changes to this page, which read like it was written by Aqua Bounty marketing executives. There are no studies done on whether or not the genetically modified salmon proposed for production is safe for human consumption, and people have a legitimate concern over its safety.  The ocean pout page should not be used as a sneaky way to promote a controversial GM organism. ~ * ~ Blue Electric Storm ~ * ~ (talk) 21:48, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

message: This article has next to nothing about ocean pout. The use of pout genes in genetic engineering is appropriate content, but it should be a minor part of the article. David notMD (talk) 10:20, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs a lot more about ocean pout!
Talk:Tom Cruise: All the World's a Stage

message: The notability tag is inappropriate on this article, which was placed very shortly after this article was created:
#The book has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works whose sources are independent of the book itself, with at least some of these works serving a general audience.
#The book has been printed in three different releases, one paperback in October 2006, one hardcover in March 2007, and again in paperback May 2007.
#The book is written by notable author, Iain Johnstone.
-- Cirt (talk) 07:04, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability tag is inappropriate
Talk:Luis G. Abbadie

message: I've removed the entire External Link section, because they were either blank, non-existent or directed to a personal blog.  As always, I'm willing to discuss objections or cleanup suggestions.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.108.102.4 (talk) 01:37, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I was the person that made the above-stated corrections; upon further investigation, I've also removed a lot of broken (404) reference links from the article.  The one I haven't removed remain because I can't tell if they're broken or not XD. Frednotbob (talk) 02:10, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Links broken
Talk:Sanjaagiin Bayar

message: I removed the section for now because the impression it currently gives is rather misleading (my fault, actually). At some point after adding the section, I also heard that Hulan was his second wife, that he had several kids with his first wife, and that his marriage with Hulan is (was?) not a very happy one. I agree in principle with latebird's removal of the recent edits, though a better solution would be to find some sources for Monsoon12's edits. Yaan (talk) 11:45, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: We also have to be very careful to protect the privacy of family members that are not themselfes public figures. Khulan is one of the very few exceptions where the name of a spouse may be relevant. But in most cases, the only thing we should say is whether there is a family or not, but no further details about them. --Latebird (talk) 12:50, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: OK. But First Ladys would be relevant too, right? Yaan (talk) 14:21, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: By name only if she has become a public figures on her own merits. Just being "the wife of x" should not be enough to publish someone's name, if all she does is stand around decoratively at certain events.  --Latebird (talk) 19:16, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  family situation 

message: relevant? Yaan (talk) 13:08, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  power struggle with N. Enkhbayar 
Talk:Hammersmith flyover

message: I have tried to update that section but is it considered up to date now?Vincent60030 (talk) 03:49, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outdated section - Repair Work 
Talk:Harrow Way

message: These could be tidied up: a mixture of styles with authors stated variously, e.g. by Elfrida Manning.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 04:26, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: Are the terraces human-made or natural? If human-made the link doesn't seem right as the article only applies to natural geological features. --Old Moonraker (talk) 21:11, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikilink to [[Terrace (geology)]]
Talk:Hogarth Roundabout

message: It would be nice to add a summary of the relatively recent creation of this roundabout and the new road system, which has so devastated Old Chiswick and Hammersmith. The article on the A4 also omits this topic. I fear that if I wrote it it would violate the POV rules. I will try to find a factual reference though. Davidnugget (talk) 23:02, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes, there's certainly no place for editorial opinions here, nor for selective use of opposition statements. But a cited description of the changes would be of value. Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:02, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Creation of the roundabout 
Talk:Holywell Street, Oxford

message: Hello!Commenting the introduction of the Obscene Publications Act of 1857, Lord Chief Justice, Lord Campbell said the enforcement of this act is the "siege of Holywell-Street [sic]" (M. J. D. Roberts, "Morals, Arts and the Law: The Passing of the Obscene Publications Act of 1957", Victorian Studies, 28:4, p. 626.) Is it possible that he meant this street? Ciao --Catfisheye (talk) 01:35, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No, that is the other Holywell Street in London, off the Strand. Now completely demolished btw but very notorious in its day. Colin4C (talk) 14:45, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The siege of Holywell Street 
Talk:Icknield Street

message: Templeborough is named in the lede but the article doesn't mention much north of Derby, and has no further reference to Templeborough.  The Templeborough page asserts that the road reaches (and passes) Templeborough but with no obvious reference that we can re-use here.  Any thoughts on how to improve on this point? -  Thanks -  Gilgamesh4 (talk) 08:40, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Templeborough
Talk:Icknield Way

message: The Icknield Way and Icknield Way Path articles have hatnotes that explain how one article is about the old footpath and the other is about the modern footpath.  However, in both articles the lead and infobox seem to describe the modern designated trail (activities include cycling and the length is about 100 miles).
I assume that the split should be similar to that between Watling Street and A5 road (Great Britain).  I have changed the lead and infobox accordingly, created a new section on modern paths, and removed a few categories. JonH (talk) 12:24, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Icknield Way and Icknield Way Path 

message: This article is desperately in need of a map, and more especially because of the numerous alternative paths along the Way.Jezza (talk) 15:45, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I just had much the same thought. The template below will add it to a category that might just possibly attract someone's attention. Qwfp (talk) 19:21, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree..this article needs a map 2600:1702:2340:9470:98B7:7AA1:2C0C:1EE (talk) 23:48, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map Needed 
Talk:Wildrose Party of Alberta

message: The website for the Wildrose Alliance Party is still up and running, and it appears that it's a functioning political party. Is it defunct or still operational? The latter appears to the case according to their own website. If that's the case, why does the article make it seem as if this party is no longer established? From my perspective, it seems to be fully functional. 72.39.210.23 (talk) 22:19, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was or is a political party? 

message: Is there any reference that this party was ever registered with Elections Alberta? 117Avenue (talk) 02:22, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Party status 

message: It seems to me that we can discuss Wildrose Party of Alberta, Wildrose Alliance Party, and Wildrose Party in the same article.  This one needs cleanup anyway as it is almost entirely unsourced. 162.208.168.92 (talk) 02:03, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:List of closes on the Royal Mile

message: As created this is all a bit of a time-warp. It is neither a comprehensive list of all closes that existed nor a list of all that now exist (many have been recreated in new developments. What it is is a list of closes as existed 1950 to 1970. It deserves to be updated to have any meaning plus could usefully distinguish public from private, dead-ends from through routes, and those which are 100% sealed and just exist as a sign on the wall. I will try to update asap--Stephencdickson (talk) 16:24, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of road junctions in the United Kingdom: S

message: On the map, the location doesn't look like a road junction. Maybe one of the roundabouts on A509 is meant?  ---  unsigned comment in page
:  Looking at    here there appears to be a roundabout halfway round the Avebury Boulevard, between the two Elder junctions.... C2r (talk) 19:12, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  South Elder Roundabout
Talk:Black Squirrel Radio

message: For anyone who edits, be aware of Wikipedia policy on what to include and what not to include. Lists of everyone who works at the station should be avoided as those are considered directories. Be sure to check WP:NOT for policies on what articles should and shouldn't be. Remember, these articles are encyclopedic articles about the subject (in this case BSR), not a list of people who work there. The station's own website is for that kind of information. The only people who should be mentioned here would be any alumni who have become notable in some way and those involved in the establishment of the station. --JonRidinger (talk) 18:21, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Staff lists
Talk:Curriculum of the Waldorf schools

message: And where is maths in all of this?—Preceding unsigned comment added by Ajr1212 (talk • contribs) 
:Whoops! There again. Hgilbert (talk) 19:53, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Mathematics

message: User:Alexbrn, if you excise texts in this page and the other off-shoot pages, it will make it considerably harder for me to work on the curriculum section on the Waldorf Education main page as I agreed to do. I can't follow you all over wiki. Please slow down and work with other editors who are trying to discuss things before making changes. I don't see any egregious self-serving claims being made here. And Rist & Schneider isn't exactly self-published. It was a UNESCO working paper/white paper. Perhaps eventually some of these citations can be replaced with other sources but there is no urgency. When accompanying text is excised it's hard to get a sense for the content that has been removed. The potential result is that the page becomes devoid of precisely the kind of descriptions people are looking for when they come here. Selected quotes can only go so far in creating overall useful descriptions. Please, please allow the chance for other editors to reflect on content and discuss it. As it stands now, a majority of these pages have been written or highly edited by you. Wikipedia is supposed to be collaborative and open. Most people don't have hours upon hours to devote to this. We all need to act in ways that allow others to participate no matter their level of interest and time. Thank you. Jellypear (talk) 23:58, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I am tagging body text rather than removing it; see also discussion on the main Talk:Waldorf education page. Alexbrn (talk) 08:56, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: You just removed body text again. Perhaps you forgot that you wrote the above? hgilbert (talk) 13:57, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Excising Non-RS 

message: These are works published in peer reviewed journals, not the university research reports. Clearly RSshgilbert (talk) 13:55, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, sorry - your revert is correct. I had completely forgotten that Dahlin was an author of those too. Alexbrn talk|contribs|COI 14:03, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dahlin 

message: I think this sub page would be more informative if the subjects and the order in which they are typically offered to students could be incorporated. I see no other way of doing this than to rely on internal Waldorf sources. This is allowable in the Arbcom decision for non-controversial claims. Thoughts? Jellypear (talk) 17:57, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Curriculum Order
Talk:Taxonomy of the Lepidoptera

message: I think this article is sometimes inaccurate with where the families are placed. I've already moved several, and removed a few superfamilies that don't exist (and those are just the taxa that I've checked!) I don't know if it's because this is an old article or if it had a bad source... So there's probably more problems here.  — Ypna • Ypna  23:24, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Based on Capinera. But if you are fixing it please give a latest complete list from somewhere as a base and detailed refs for changes. changes without refs are to no utility. AshLin (talk) 07:09, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: So far the only changes I've made aren't sourced from outside Wikipedia. But yes, sure.  — Ypna • Ypna  06:37, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

text: Superfamily Zygaenoidea appears twice, in sections Tineina and Cossina.  Can someone check which is correct? —JerryFriedman  (Talk) 23:12, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccuracy 

message: Having at least 1 lepidopterist advocating this course of action, several complaints about the status quo, and no contrary opinions, I went ahead I revised the page to follow the Zootaxa listing.  Could somebody pls proofread and post an "all clear" here (so people will know it's checked) or make corrections?
There's no really good graphical solution for the 'spanning' clades.  They're not very clear as listed in Zootaxa, but it's not practical to give each its own level (plus that artificially demotes the following groups).  However, I didn't want to omit them, as they certainly provide information, plus doing so would introduce deviation between Wikipedia & the tax authority.  I ended up indicating them with a text notation, "encompasses all remaining groups."  If anybody has a better solution, or if there is some generally accepted convention (in the literature or in Wikipedia), by all means change it.  No point reinventing the wheel here, esp if it's not a very good wheel.
I also rewrote the intro pgraph to use the more formal "basal" instead of "primitive"/"archaic" and to avoid any implication of a false parallelism between butterflies & moths.
Gould363 (talk) 00:45, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Started some cleanup to the subtaxa: Attevinae --> Attevidae (fixing broken link), family list on Yponomeutoidea page.  But there's plenty more to be done.
Gould363 (talk) 14:58, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revised per van Nieukirken et al. 2011
Talk:Magdalen Street

message: As other examples of Magdalen Street exist (for example in Norwich and London), I will be moving the page to 'Magdalen Street, Oxford'. I do think this is a controversial move. Amitchell125 (talk) 07:38, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: =Proposal to rename
Talk:Magic Roundabout (Colchester)

message: In all my years, I have never heard it called "the magic roundabout". It is always referred to as Greenstead Roundabout or Greenstead Road Roundabout.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.250.249.122 (talk) 04:26, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does anybody actually know it as the Magic Roundabout? 
Talk:Sexual continence

message: Sexual continence used to mean having only one partner. Biscuittin (talk) 16:00, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Older definition 

message: I redirected this article to coitus reservatus because it seemed to have essentially the same information. Also, much of the information seemed like it was simply copied from another source, did not follow NPOV, and just generally didn't look good. ~Lewis1350 (talk) 02:55, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect to [[coitus reservatus]] 

message: Sexual continence simply is not coitus reservatus. There may be some people who use it that way but it is certainly not the whole story. Sexual continence may also be abstinence and may be marital fidelity. TMLutas (talk) 15:20, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Problem with redirect
Talk:Mersey Tunnels

message: This recent Echo article is both an interesting read and a useful source for this article. Might get around to expanding it soon. Sam Walton (talk) 11:55, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source 
Talk:List of Seattle street fairs and parades

message: When I was doing the research that Bobblehead used to create this article, I was focused on substantiating the number of neighborhoods that had such fairs and parades. There are more to add (other stuff in the International District, Bon Odori, Pride Parade, MLK Day parade, etc.) but we'll need to find citations for those. I've taken the liberty of adding the Torchlight Parade because it has an article, although that article needs citation. - Jmabel | Talk 07:05, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Things to add
Talk:National Cycle Route 1

message: More details (Scottish sections) at http://www.sustrans.org.uk/default.asp?sID=1132673749156
*Esk Valley Cycle Route (Musselburgh to Dalkeith)http://www.sustrans.org.uk/webfiles/leaflets/esk_valley.pdf
(Dalkeith to Penicuik http://www.sustrans.org.uk/webfiles/scotland/Penicuik_to_Dalkeith.pdf seems to be just off this route)
*Dundee to Arbroath http://www.sustrans.org.uk/webfiles/scotland/Dundee_to_Arbroath.pdf
*Cullen to Garmouth http://www.sustrans.org.uk/webfiles/scotland/cullen_to_garmouth.pdf
*Kessock to Culloden http://www.sustrans.org.uk/webfiles/scotland/Kessock_to_Culloden.pdf
See also:
*http://www.sustrans.org.uk/default.asp?sID=1133345093421
*http://www.sustrans.org.uk/default.asp?sID=1133365928671
Samantha of Cardyke (talk) 18:03, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Lincoln to John O'Groats

message: These pages, like the other cycle routes, need links to decent maps - good enough for someone to use for planing. Ideally to GPS data too. Murkee (talk) 09:21, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maps 

message: Maybe one might implement the information, that NCN 1 is, on its full length, part of EuroVelo Route 12 (North Sea Cycle Route). I dont want to add it, 'cause I am not a native speaker. Greets, --Timmaexx (talk) 16:13, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  EuroVelo Network 
Talk:National Cycle Route 7

message: *Aviemore to Slochd http://www.sustrans.org.uk/webfiles/scotland/Aviemore_to_Slochdb.pdf
Samantha of Cardyke (talk) 18:17, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Pitlochry to Inverness
Talk:National Cycle Route 75

message: *Clyde Corridor Cycle Route (Glasgow to Uddingston) http://www.sustrans.org.uk/webfiles/leaflets/clyde_corridor.pdf
*Paisley & Clyde Railway Path (Paisley to Gourock) http://www.sustrans.org.uk/webfiles/leaflets/PAISLEY%20AND%20CLYDE%202004.pdf
Samantha of Cardyke (talk) 17:44, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Glasgow to Gourock
Talk:National Cycle Route 8

message: It seems quite pointless and a shame, in my opinion, to just forget about merging these two articles. I propose merging L%C3%B4n Las Cymru into National Cycle Route 8, and then developing the article. If anyone has any objections, please contact me. Kevin Steinhardt (talk) 17:05, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[L%C3%B4n Las Cymru]]
Talk:New Inn Hall Street

message: Hi, I’ve been trying to find a lead on my great grandmother. She was in a orphanage at 38 new inn hall st , Oxford. I can never seem to find any information on it. Please help! If anyone knows 2A02:C7E:351E:D100:154A:587:4F6C:B915 (talk) 14:03, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Children home around 1903
Talk:Northmoor Road

message: Many of the houses covered here are or were owned by Oxford colleges.  It would be interesting to be told.  Deipnosophista (talk) 09:57, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ownership 

message: Another famous resident of the Street is Indologist and Archaeologist A.F. Rudolf Hoernle, famous for his translation of the Bower Manuscript, who (at least in 1906, but propably for a significant portion of his Oxford life) lived in 8. Northmoor R. according to archival Letters by him that the University of Leipzig, Germany holds.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.147.121.44 (talk) 07:33, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Rudolf Hoernlé. His ODNB article (or, to be exact, his son's) notes that he died at 8 Northmoor Road in 1918, so that's a sufficiently reliable source. I will add him. GrindtXX (talk) 11:32, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Rudolf Hoernle
Talk:Constitution of Arizona

message: The sentence "The current constitution is the only adopted by the state of Arizona" doesn't make sense to me and isn't even punctuated properly.  I see that in a previous revision  that the wording makes sense and is punctuated properly.  I am going to revise it to reflect that version. Thane Eichenauer (talk) 20:41, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Only adopted wording 

message: Sooo, Im new at this. I see that this has been listed as a start with high importance but I don't know what to add to the article. Any suggestions?
TheRickerator (talk) 04:48, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Want to help...
Talk:Fleet Farm

message: Questionable return policies at Mills Fleet Farm. Some stores seem to be lacking customer service skills. If you've opened an item they may not offer a full refund. They tell may tell you its used. If you have used an item and you do not like it,they might offer an exchange or a credit. They sometimes take off money because you've tried it. This is with a reciept of course.
Soooo ... nothing about the article then? -M.S.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.36.221.2 (talk) 23:46, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

message: Please stop selling my pillows. The man is lying and interfering with democracy, inciting conspiracy. 65.128.21.12 (talk) 18:37, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  My pillow/ Mike Lindell