lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of main characters on seaQuest DSV

message: I think we shouldn't use infoboxes in this article. They make the article unwieldy. Everything in the infoboxes can be incorporated into the section if properly sourced (birth dates, positions etc).--Fogeltje (talk) 12:13, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I Think they're fine IF the section is long enough for it, like fords and smiths. Dr. Stantz (talk) 20:56, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Use of infoboxes

message: Due to the ever changing of ranks in the show I vote to Go by name and have the rank mentioned in the info box and or article. I.e. Henderson went from Seaman to LtJg, or Picollo, who went from Seaman to Petty officer to Warrant officer. Dr. Stantz (talk) 20:56, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Alternatively you can mention the last rank they had on the show in the subtitle, Lt JG for Henderson and WO for Picollo. If that is done in a consistent manner, then I don't see a problem. The promotions can be addressed in the text. But either way is fine, as long as we keep it consistent.--Fogeltje (talk) 21:58, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Use of Rank

message: The article originally stated that he would ultimately unable to keep that promise. The story revolving around her has played it's course at any point since coming back in 2032. His mother could have been awakened and seen his mother. There is no evidence to support not keeping his promise nor to support keeping his promise. It shouldn't be included at all one way or another. --The Virginian (talk) 16:38, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brody's promise to his mother 

message: Fair use images have been removed from this article per policy and guideline. The indiscriminate use of per character images in lists such as this is not supported. See similar discussion at Talk:Supporting_Harry_Potter_characters#Overuse_of_fair_use_images and Talk:List_of_James_Bond_henchmen_in_Die_Another_Day#Fair_use_image_removal (and observe that fair use images remain removed or tightly limited on those two articles). --Hammersoft (talk) 13:57, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use images removed
Talk:Shinyo (suicide motorboat)

message: Should this page be moved to perhaps Shinyo suicide boats or something similar? I'm thinking about creating a disambig page for this article and Japanese aircraft carrier Shinyo, and this page would be the best location for it. This article name also isn't very descriptive. Any thoughts? Parsecboy (talk) 02:41, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Given the lack of response after a reasonable amount of time, I'm going to go ahead and move this page. Parsecboy (talk) 14:57, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Move page?
Category talk:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Bardeep

message: to be added to the list
bardeep7
bardeep8
bardeep18
bardeep19
Bardeep8 (talk) 12:29, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Whats the use of this category? --SMS  Talk 12:47, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Oxygen compounds

message: This article failed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of February 12, 2008, compares against the  six good article criteria:
:1. Well written?: This article fails mainly for overuse of jargon and not meeting the criteria in wikipedia:lead.  Remember that the lead should introduce the subject and provide a general summary of the article which is accessible to a general audience.
:2. Factually accurate?: Article is well sourced.
:3. Broad in coverage?: The article could use more detail on the more important compounds of oxygen. At present it reads like a list of everything which oxygen can form a compound with (which, save the noble gases, is everything!) 
:4. Neutral point of view?: Pass
:5. Article stability? Pass
:6. Images?: Good variety, all pass copyright.
When these issues are addressed, the article can be renominated.  If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it have it reassessed.  Thank you for your work so far.</div>— jwandersTalk 03:05, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Failed "good article" nomination
Talk:Blue Stone (neutron initiator)

message: The WikiProject classification for Blue Stone (neutron initiator) is Start-class. However, the page has less than 100 words, so it might not meet the grading criteria. If it should be a stub, then please set  on this talk page & reinstate the stub tags on the article page.   ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf)  02:05, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please confirm classification 
Talk:N. Lingusamy

message: Kathukita motha vithayum iraka poren
182.71.231.68 (talk) 09:17, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: as you have not requested a change.If you want to suggest a change, please request this, in English, in the form "Please replace XXX with YYY" or "Please add ZZZ between PPP and QQQ".Please also cite reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to any article. - Arjayay (talk) 17:18, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  They are making fun of N. Lingusamy. This quote of "Kathukita motha vithayum iraka poren" was made by him in televised interview a year back and it became internet slang in Tamilnadu in the past few days. Avoid acknowledging such edit requests -Vatsan34 (talk) 16:27, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 21 September 2014 

message: He Knows for his Very wel most favourite dialog "Kathukitta Motha Vithaiyum Erakuren" (I'll Give all the stuff i learned)
86.96.226.7 (talk) 12:13, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. Cannolis (talk) 18:43, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 21 September 2014
Talk:Cadherin-1

message: Is there anyone who can cleanup this (which has been up for over a decade)? Three citations for proving a single point might be OK, perhaps even five, but seriously, twenty-three?! (yes, I counted.) I could clear this myself, but it's physically painful to even navigate through the walls of text, let alone to check which are relevant and which are not dealing with subsequent cite errors (edited 00:37, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation overkill 

message: I noticed that this page was moved from "CDH1 (gene)" the "Cadherin-1" with the reason being that this is the preferred protein name. It is not. The mammalian literature all refer to the protein as "E-cadherin". I agree with not using "CDH1" because it is ambiguous, but I would prefer to see each of the cadherin pages named for their common protein names; i.e., E-cadherin, N-cadherin, P-cadherin, VE-cadherin, etc., since that is how they appear in the literature. Mdonken (talk) 17:52, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename to "E-cadherin"
Talk:Mick Cooke (football manager)

message: You may restore the article when it has something more to say than "he is a manager of football club X". People clicking through already know that, and the "article" is not improving their knowledge about the person. Therefore, as it stood, it's worthless. --kingboyk (talk) 12:12, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replaced with a redirect for now 
Talk:Ceylon Defence Force

message: There's an extensive bibliography at https://www.scribd.com/doc/38832696/Ceylon-Light-Infantry-Bibiliography1 which might help to identify sources useful here. Certainly the article needs much better sourcing. LeadSongDog come howl! 15:47, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Almost unreferenced 
Talk:Cost estimation in software engineering

message: I think the name of the article should be changed. Estimation in software engineering is not a proper title for en encyclopedic article. The article does not even currently give a definintion for that word. Not sure though what the best title would be. Perhaps Effort estimation (redirects here)? That is a term mostly used in software engineering (37 000 of the 43 200 pages that Google finds on effort estimation includes the word software). Lakeworks (talk) 13:24, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm wondering if parts of "Agile Project Management with SCRUM" should be leasted here?  Burn down charts, and task complexity estimation? Mathiastck (talk) 00:52, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  SCRUM 

message: I suggest that the name should be "software development effort estimation". I think we should avoid general, non-software specific names, and names that do not say anything about what we estimate. I don't think we should mix software development effort estimation and other project management means (ref. burn down charts), unless the connection is very obvious, i.e., use of work breakdown structures in bottom-up effort estimation.¨¨¨¨  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Magnej (talk • contribs) 13:23, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change of name 

message: How about "Software effort estimation". That is what we learn and called it at class.
: Our course book, Software Project Management by Hughes & Cotterell, uses the title "Software effort estimation" for the subject. I believe the book is quite reliable source. 87.94.152.31 (talk) 14:20, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestion of name

message: It seems that a few quite different kinds of methods are mixed up in the list. Yes, COCOMO, SEER-SEM, and some of the others are (effort) estimation methods. But Function Points and Use Case Points are not. They are size measures, that can be used as *input* for effort estimation, but they are not effort (or cost) estimation methods themselves.
Han691 (talk) 21:15, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Size measures and estimation methods are mixed up 

message: Can this be merged with Software development effort estimation? power~enwiki (π, ν) 16:51, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  A merge suggestion
Talk:Pulitzer Prize for Editorial Writing

message: This is sort of shabby isn't it? I mean this is a major American award I believe and almost half of it's red.--T. Anthony (talk) 13:28, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's really difficult to find sources on these people.  A lot of editorial are unsigned, so a lot of times the authors aren't even known until they win major awards.  Newspapers have a habit of not writing about themselves, or other people in their profession that often, so sometimes the only material available will be from the Pulitzer Committee and, for the early winners, an obituary.  The opinion columnists that are household names, that you see on TV, etc., are generally eligible for the Pulitzer Prize for Commentary instead. --JayHenry (talk) 18:37, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
File talk:Steamtop.jpg

message: This is my image.  It is CC Attr. Share alike, but the Flickr license cited in not valid as that Flickr photo does not attribute the photo to me.  I'll post a CC notice on my website steampunkworkshop.com shortly and link that.  Vonslatt (talk) 13:44, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I want two of them! - Arcayne (cast a spell) 14:05, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: /Insert similar expression of admiration here/. Fantastiqual! ... said: Rursus (bork²) 17:30, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Maui Pineapple Company

message: Category:Hawaii articles without infoboxes
Critique an article
The article, titled "The Maui Pineapple Company," is clear and relevant to the topic. Each subtopic seemed relevant and intriguing. Nothing that necessarily distracted me, but it was interesting to learn that the founder of Ebay owns a pineapple farm in Hawaii. The article seems neutral and did not frame any information in a heavily biased manner. The information comes from Hawaiian newspapers, Pacific research journals, and pineapple research reports. These seem like neutral sources and no viewpoints are underrepresented. At least two of the links did not work when I checked the citations but there's no close plagiarism, but the information is up to date.
Why was Pierre Omidyar interested in the pineapple farm?
If the product isn't shipped to the mainland, is it consumed domestically on the Island?
Hsg260 (talk) 23:34, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Talk:Halfnelson (band)

message: "Mendelsohn and Oswald later formed Christopher Milk. Their ground breaking, iconic album "Some People Will Drink Anything" inspired many imitators."
Really? Really? Now, I haven't heard their stuff (or even heard of it, for that matter, and I'm a pretty big music buff), but... "ground breaking"? "Iconic"? "Inspired many imitators"? Them's some big words for a band and album which aren't even big enough to warrant a wiki page. I could be wrong, but this sounds more like the work of either 1. a lone fan 2. a friend of the band or 3. a washed-up band member. Somebody care to prove me wrong? --216.165.95.5 (talk) 04:09, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Intelligence Bureau for the East

message: The article seems to focus on German operations in India and South Asia. The key target area of the Nachrichtenstelle was the so-called "Arab World", mainly the French and British colonial possessions in North Africa, and their strong activities in the crumbling Ottoman Empire, namely in the Arab parts of the Ottoman empire: the Levant, Palestine, Syria, Lebanon, Egypt, Libya, the Arab peninsula, Iraq, Yemen. Oppenheim was only initially the head of Nachrichtenstelle, beginning in 1916 the head was Eugen Mittwoch, who is also known in the USA as an important Orthodox Jewish teacher and Rabbi, namely of the famous "Rav" Joseph B. Soloveitchik. Other people working for Nachrichtenstelle who became later famous in the United States include Ernst Jaeckh (who later was professor at Columbia University and founded the Middle East department there), Max Rudolf Kaufmann, and Nahum Goldmann (later president of the World Jewish Congress). --Ischtiraki (talk) 10:32, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Key aspects are missing: Activities in the Arab World and the Near East
Talk:Tumor necrosis factor receptor 1

message: Not sure where this information comes from.
OK, so since many pages make the same error and a similar error was made with HLA pages.
The receptor (a protein) is currently called TNF-R1. The protein is encoded by TNFRSF1A, and although it can be called this, that is a locus name, just like HLA-DRB1 is a locus name but the polypeptide is calle DR[beta]1 and is a part of the DR protein. 
If you look at OMIM cd120 is not listed as a name.
"
TUMOR NECROSIS FACTOR RECEPTOR 1; TNFR1
TUMOR NECROSIS FACTOR-ALPHA RECEPTOR; TNFAR
TNFR, 55-KD
TNFR, 60-KD
"
I cannot recall any publications in the last 5 years that use CD120, CD120A or CD120B.
The pages name really should be TNF-R1, which is the product of the processed TNFRSF1A gene which can be redirected.
I looked at pubmed, only 4 papers use the term cd120. When I used TNF-R1, 447 articles showed up and TNFR1 produced 3350 articles. With TNFRSF1A 330 articles showed up (which may be dealing with the gene and gene linkage,so.....)
TNFR1 is the name that should be used. Tumor necrosis factor receptor 1.
PB666 yap 03:06, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:LBi/archive 1

message: I think this company might be notable. See the following news articles:
    . I also removed some of the more advertisy sections. — Ksero 16:10, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:COI apparent because of User:LBigroup. He really should at least stop editing the article completely. ScarianTalk 16:15, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  "Editors who may have a conflict of interest are not barred from participating in articles and discussion of articles where they have a conflict of interest" — Ksero 16:17, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

text: This article has no assertion of notability, and provides no sources. It's gonna get deleted unless these issues are addressed. the_undertow talk 01:37, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

message: I rejected this request because in its current state the article content simply is not blatant advertising under WP:CSD G11. It is a brief and relatively modest description of the company. The article asserts notability and the company appears to be of sufficient size and scope that it is not obviously non-notable. Speedy deletion is not the appropriate avenue in such cases, please use WP:AFD to determine if the article should be deleted. --Shirahadasha 03:13, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Could you cite what you find to be the assertion of notability? the_undertow talk 03:20, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:CSD]] request 

message: Hi - I'm not going to get too involved as I currently work for LBi, however I thought some background might be useful. Have a look at Michiel Mol - there's an empty link on Lost Boys (company), which is (unofficially, I think) the LB of LBi. (I would edit Lost Boys (company) and set it as a redirect to LBi, but ...)
In addition to the two companies mentioned on Michiel Mol, LBi has also merged a number of other companies, such as Oyster Partners, Framfab and Aspect Group who are independently linked to F1, having developed the F1 website & Internet live-timing system.
In terms of whether the company is notable or not, it's roughly equivalent to a company such as AKQA, which has an entry. As a brand, it's still very young - people who are unconnected with the company would be more likely to create pages for prior brands/company names.
I fully accept the conflict of interest remark, however I personally believe that it's better for a company to start an article like this openly rather than have someone apparently unconnected make changes. At least, then, it's easy to see which edits need the most critical review. Foddy 09:35, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Duly noted and removed. Employee's or people related to the firm, in any way, are requested to ask for improvements or major changes through the article's discussion page. Hooah. ScarianTalk 13:29, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:Quay Sailing Club

message: This article reads like an advertisement or promotion, and doesn't adhere to Wikipedia's standards for articles having a neutral point of view. I'd suggest the article is edited so as to be consistent with Wikipedia standards. ~Stetay — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stetay (talk • contribs) 14:22, 26 Jan 2008
Article edited slightly, however as a member of Quay Sailing Club I can confirm that there is nothing in the article which is not fact.
If any part of the article is still regarded as not having a neutral point of view, perhaps more specific feedback will assist me in making it so. Thans for taking the time and trouble to comment.  Philovey (talk) 13:16, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Tone
File talk:X-Window-System.png

message: Hey, um, I can see the word "macbook" in there. Someone might want to upload a modified image, or you might want to change your hostname for the picture :P
::erm, This screenshot is reminiscent of a typical Unix graphical desktop from the late 1980s to early 1990s.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.29.40.251 (talk) 22:36, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

message: Yes it is indeed reminiscent!  I haven't seen that look in a good while. The logo and oclock and xbiff and xman really do the trick. The macbook/octave stuff is a small nice touch to remind the viewer that this just is a recreation of the vintage look. linas (talk) 03:22, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Woo Hoo!
Talk:Butler Blue

message: No doubt that Butler Blue II has a significant role at Butler. His fame derives from his mascot role so I propose a nice paragraph or 2 under "Mascots". Thoughts, anyone? --Stormbay (talk) 22:34, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge? 

message: It appears the original text of this article (before it was redirected) was copied and pasted form Butler's website with only very minor changes by User:MSKaltenmark.  It is possible that Kalternmark wrote the text at Butler as well (since he is the dog's owner), but even if he did it is doubtful that he had permission to re-license it.   
I have redone the article from scratch and deleted the history (per policy copyright violations should be deleted when possible).  No material contributions have been deleted. --ThaddeusB (talk) 07:24, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright violation
Talk:Thumbcuffs

message: Not sure what to write here. 
The universal hand cuff key actually works with these and I'm not sure how to change the wiki so please help.
And I also would like to thank whoever wrote this because I found out what the bottom button was (the thingy to stop it from getting tighter)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.27.134.231 (talk) 10:25, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
Talk:List of Grand Slam boys' doubles champions

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Strongly oppose. This is not a page of male GS doubles winners, it is a list of junior (U18) GS doubles winners; "boys" is what tennis calls the junior events. See Australian Open, French Open, Wimbledon, US Open. Recommend nominee withdraws this. Iamaleopard (talk) 17:01, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Zipper (BDSM)

message: I've removed the sentence about zippers being used in predicament bondage; the only support I can find for this is from blogs, which are not reliable sources in the Wikipedia sense. -- The Anome (talk) 12:12, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Predicament bondage
File talk:TrajanSpec3a.svg

message: The sample text is incorrect - in populusque there are two v's and one u. --91.141.112.74 (talk) 15:15, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Incorrect. There are no u's in populusque. The letter u did not appear until the 14th century, nearly 1300 years after Trajan's Column was constructed. The lettering used on the inscription is "POPVLVSQVE" -- 70.125.17.216 (talk) 16:33, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Talk:Bluffton Exempted Village School District

message: Is there any other motto which contains a comparable number of words? Just hear them call " Rah, Rah, Bluffton Exempted Village School District. To develop individuals who demonstrate problem-solving skills, personal responsibility, and a desire for lifelong learning.”--SilasW (talk) 15:24, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Motto
Talk:Greenbrier East High School

message: The principal's name is Jeff, not Jeffy.  I was a student of his, but since that's OR I'll point out that his name in the faculty listing at http://www.greenbriereast.com/ is "Jeff Bryant".  Please stop making unhelpful changes to a living person's name. Caelarch (talk) 06:19, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jeff, not Jeffy
Talk:Charmoy, Aube

message: Another one? There are about four articles that have this exact text, except for the first (the town's name). I suggest a merge. Basketballoneten 15:52, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No.  This is a defined commune in France.  You are welcome to join WP:FR and contribute more to this and other related articles.  Kiwipete (talk) 07:36, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What?