Talk:Fructooligosaccharide

message: I see no reason not to integrate these two articles, provided that some reference is still given to the synonymous nature of the two names, and a redirect option is given.
--Alwaysasigh 08:50, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

message: I plugged in "Oliofructose" into wikipedia, only to come up with that cannot find search page. yet when I plugged into a seach engine, the wikipedia artcle appears! While the entry is labled Fructooliogosaccharide, the article also acknowledges that it is also sometimes called Oligofructose. If opensource and open information is to be useful, you need to do things as well as the MS and other products. Please put in multiple pointers for searhed terms, acknowledging that sometimes there are multiple terms used.
THANKS. CB 1/27/2008  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.24.45.96 (talk) 20:19, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  help those researching information FIND what they are looking for 

message: This article talk page was automatically added with  banner as it falls under :Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and carefull attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 17:39, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:FOOD|WikiProject Food and drink]] Tagging

message: The Food Sources section lists only plant sources:
FOS is extracted from fruits and vegetables like bananas, onions, chicory root, garlic, asparagus, barley, wheat, jícama, tomatoes, and leeks. The Jerusalem artichoke and its relative, yacón have been found to have the highest concentrations of FOS of cultured plants
But the very last line of the article, after the Types of Carbohydrates table, says:
It [?] is derived from an animal product therefore not suitable for vegetarians.
Any reason not to delete the  line? Epikoros (talk) 17:07, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Isn't it vegetarian? 

message: I searched what is FOS when I saw it into the ingredients of my biscuits. I was expecting it is unhealthy, so what a surprise when I read there it has health benefits.
This is Wikipedia and I'm not stupid, thus I continued my researched and found that EFSA disclaimed everything about FOS. Food industries are even forbidden to write on their products the benefits it was supposed to give.
I suggest it should be deleted, or at least edited to warn people that all of this is now considered wrong by EFSA.
Here is a link : http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2023/epdf. You can indirectly find it by typing "EFSA FOS" in your favourite search engine.
PS : Sorry for my eventual spelling mistakes, I'm not English.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:CB08:8640:4000:7D19:1588:A1B6:9F59 (talk) 17:57, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Health benefits" section is apparently totally wrong 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Fructooligosaccharide. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050214112050/http://www.nutrition.org/cgi/content/abstract/134/2/399 to http://www.nutrition.org/cgi/content/abstract/134/2/399
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070420192622/http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~rdb/opa-g044.html to http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~rdb/opa-g044.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:20, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified