Talk:Visegrád Group

message: I deleted the sentence "After Slovenia, the Visegrád Group are the wealthiest post-Communist countries in Europe, but they still fall significantly behind the Western economies." because it's not true, at least not anymore. Look at countries like Portugal which are as wealthy as Czech Republic.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.173.13.31 (talk) 19:23, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fall behind west 

message: o, like, what does it do, what's it about? The term "furthering the integration" is very vague and the whole thing might be merely cordial... --Shallot 11:09, 25 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: It is. Ausir 19:42, 25 Jul 2004 (UTC)

text: Anything new to update this article?  I agree that there should be more to address the purpose of the group.  Perhaps along the lines of an alliance for common defense of member states from historical antagonists Russia and Germany?  This is pure speculation on my part, BTW.  --Dymaxion (talk) 22:14, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: In hindsight of Russia's recent actions, you may be right.142.105.159.60 (talk) 06:08, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

text: The Hungarian king mentioned has to be Charles Robert since he was our king between 1308–1342. Wikipedia says the king of Poland was Casimir III and the king of Bohemia was John of Luxembourg at that time. -- Pronunciation: "i" is spelled as in "it", s = sh, "a" as in "father", I guess it's something like vi-sheh-grahd but I'm really not good at these. Alensha 23:49, 3 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Function of the Visegrád Group 

message: Do you mean Slovakia, or are you confused?
: No, it's correct. --Tone 16:00, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slovenia? 

message: Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
*Support as originator. Olessi 21:13, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: Is it useful to compare the V4 group's overall economy to that of an individual country (i.e. Slovenia)? It seems to me to be a rather unclear comparison - is this statement referring to the overall economic power of the group, the economies of all four states (individually) or the average of the economies? If this is resolved then the grammar issue in the statement introducing this information can be cleared up. Jimjamjak (talk) 16:18, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Economies

message: "On 14 March 2014, signed a pact" who signed a pact? the reference url is useless  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Expectationlost (talk • contribs) 11:59, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Visegrád Battlegroup 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Visegrád Group. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151217230131/http://www.socialprogressimperative.org/data/spi to http://www.socialprogressimperative.org/data/spi
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080819191518/http://www.tourismroi.com/Content_Attachments/27670/File_633513750035785076.pdf to http://www.tourismroi.com/Content_Attachments/27670/File_633513750035785076.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:33, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: In this sentence:
The Polish economy is the sixth-largest in the EU and one of the fastest-growing economies in Europe, with a yearly growth rate of over 3.0% before the late-2000s recession.
should “the late-2000s recession” be “the early-2000s recession”?
—
 Ddccss (talk) 02:03, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correction under “Poland”? 

message: I just (2017 Nov 11) experienced a problem linking to this article.
This is the article’s current URL:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visegrád_Group
I included it in a comment under a WSJ news article.  When the comment was published, the URL was terminated with the “r” preceding the “á”:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visegr
I changed the “á” to “a” and republished the comment:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visegrad_Group
This time, the whole URL was published, and the link connected to the article.
 Ddccss (talk) 02:21, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  problem caused by accent in URL 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Visegrád Group. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.stat.gov.pl/cps/rde/xbcr/gus/PUBL_lu_nps2011_wyniki_nsp2011_22032012.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160305121029/https://slovak.statistics.sk/wps/wcm/connect/1f62189f-cc70-454d-9eab-17bdf5e1dc4a/Tab_10_Obyvatelstvo_SR_podla_narodnosti_scitanie_2011_2001_1991.pdf?MOD=AJPERES to https://slovak.statistics.sk/wps/wcm/connect/1f62189f-cc70-454d-9eab-17bdf5e1dc4a/Tab_10_Obyvatelstvo_SR_podla_narodnosti_scitanie_2011_2001_1991.pdf?MOD=AJPERES
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:23, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The entire section creates major issues of undue weight and POV, since this V4+ (plus) format was also extended to other countries such as Romania, Bulgaria and Croatia — in which case, Austria is no more special than the others. Also, when asked about extending a formal V4 invitation for Austria to join the group, Hungary's PM Victor Orban stated that the strength of the V4 group lies in similar economics, culture and historical struggles, thus extending the membership to countries such as Austria would not increase the group's cohesion but work to its detriment. --E-960 (talk) 21:54, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relations with Austria 

message: Why on Earth the map of V4 contains also the EU members marked in blue?? What EU has to do with V4? maybe we should also mark the members of Eurozone, European Space Agency and EURATOM? This article is about the V4, take the EU away!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.0.123.57 (talk) 18:42, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article's illustration 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:38, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion 

message: I would like to react on @FromCzech's edit. I think it makes more sense to use the name ‘Czechia’ in the field ‘name’. The other countries have the short name in that field. The formal name is mentioned under the field. This would get the reader more information and more complex view at the situation. (The formal name is also mentioned, so the posibility of confussion equals zero.) Martin Tauchman (talk) 18:03, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Common name is used. I corrected the style following the example of Hungary. FromCzech (talk) 19:33, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  It is not true since Hunary's short name and long name do not differ. Martin Tauchman (talk) 08:11, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Country comparison