Talk:Pastwatch: The Redemption of Christopher Columbus

message: EnderWiggin (talk) 16:08, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: From an interview ate CNN:
Question: Do you plan to write a novel that follows the events of Pastwatch: The Redemption of Christopher Columbus? Perhaps one that explores the alternate history created in that novel? 
Orson Card: Pastwatch is pretty much a sequel-proof story. What we have planned for further books in the Pastwatch series (yep, series) are books that take place sort of in the midst of the Columbus book. There's the Noah book, which tells Kemal's story as frame but Noah's story and the flood as the main tale, and then there's the Garden of Eden story - yep, the hoariest cliche in science fiction, but I have no fear, the artsy types couldn't possibly despise me more, and I think there's a reason why it is the most-written cliche story in the field. People are hungry for a rational treatment of that story in science fictional terms. So ... I mean to give it a try. We'll see if anyone but me likes it. Pmcalduff (talk) 00:33, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding the "other" Pastwatch novels 

message: I moved here the content of 2 article's talk now redirecting here, in the above 2 sections. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pastwatch: The Flood- Nabla (talk) 12:03, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirects 

message: Please do NOT remove "Translations" section. It is the usual practice for articles about books to provide the list of foreign language editions of the book. It may include translated title, its reverse translation (if needed), the year of the first edition, maybe its ISBN number, etc. This information is relevant for a described book and its notability. Verdi (talk) 06:31, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translations section 

message: I understand why the redirect exists - but since there's a page for the Pastwatch series, wouldn't that be a far more appropriate place to redirect than another book in the series? Darquis (talk) 23:32, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with this. Aardvark92 (talk) 19:32, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

text: Thirded.  Kleptosquirrel (talk) 04:49, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Since no one has voiced disagreement in eight months, I went ahead and changed it. Aardvark92 (talk) 06:09, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong redirect 

message: Proposal to merge the article Pastwatch series with this one. I don't believe a couple of very old quotes, that have not born out and proved inaccurate, about intended books to form a series as sequels to this 17 year old book, necessitates an article or has the notability to justify one. All it needs is a note in this article noting that sequels were proposed to form a series but have not eventuated. Also the initial description of this books being in the 'Pastwatch series' and the infobox link to 'followed by' Pastwatch; The Flood. Should be corrected since the series does not exist nor does any sequel. All points as per WP:NOTCRYSTAL. 121.74.247.109 (talk) 03:02, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. This can all become a section at the bottom of the existing book. If/when a new book comes out then a new article can be created. - SimonLyall (talk) 00:28, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

text: --Rob Sinden (talk) 11:51, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger Proposal