lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Toluidine

message: I'm thinking of moving this article to Toluidine and expanding to cover all three toluidines.  I started writing something up under o-toluidine.  There are other Wikipedia articles which cover three aromatic isomers like this.  The table will be expanded to include two extra columns for the other two isomers as well.  When such a table can be made ready, I will then move the article and combine the toluidines.  H Padleckas 22:07, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I've made the move to Toluidines because the Wikipedia software would not allow me to move it to Toluidine, as I originally wanted to.  Then I expanded the article to cover toluidines in general at the beginning and expanded the Table of Properties so there is room for the other two isomers.  The table is still unfinished.  The previous material on p-toluidine was placed below in a separate "p-toluidine" section.  H Padleckas 06:37, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Good work merging the articles.  It should still be moved to Toluidine however.  I will alert an administrator.  (The place to do this is Wikipedia:Requested moves)  --Chinasaur 20:48, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I suggest that three other articles covering isomers of toluidine, including the two recently created and misspelled ones, be merged into this one.  Unless anyone objects, I'll do it in a week or so. Edgar181 12:24, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge suggestion 

message: How does toludine accelerate cyanoacrylate polymerization? —Ben FrantzDale 00:15, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mechanism for CA acceleration? 

message: I removed the parenthetical remark about aromatic amines being more correctly called aryl.  In my experience, both terms are in widespread use and neither is to be deprecated.  See for example the Wikipedia page on AromaticityCharlesHBennett (talk) 20:00, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  aromatic vs aryl 

message: According to the current version of Nomenclature of Organic Chemistry – IUPAC Recommendations and Preferred Names 2013 (Blue Book), the name “toluidine”, for which o-, m-, and p- have been used to distinguish isomers, is no longer recommended.
The preferred IUPAC names (PINs) are “2-methylaniline”, “3-methylaniline”, and “4-methylaniline”.
The systematic names “2-methylbenzenamine”, “3-methylbenzenamine”, and “4-methylbenzenamine” may be used in general nomenclature.
The strange names “2-amino-1-methylbenzene”, “3-amino-1-methylbenzene”, and “4-amino-1-methylbenzene”, which are currently given as “chemical name” in the table of the article, are not in accordance with current or previous IUPAC nomenclature for several reasons.
– Emeldir (talk) 19:42, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomenclature
Talk:Program

message: Would it not be preferable to separate "program" and "programme" ? A radio programme is always spelt thus and a computer program is also always spelt that way - they are different words surely ?
Johnrcrellin 07:24, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actualy, it's a locality thing. Programme is used in British and commonwealth English, and Program in American English. The two words are the same, it just depends on where you live as to which one is preferable. Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 02:12, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

text: I have reverted your change and issued you a vandalism warning; see WP:ENGVAR. Dicklyon 22:35, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  That may be useful for those from the UK but it would be utterly confusing for American users. It is the same word after all. - Epson291 (talk) 08:39, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: what about a "program" in "Minimalist Program" ?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.131.212.68 (talk) 13:27, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  another "program" 

message: The discussion on whether the page should be titled with one spelling or another, surely ought to be based on the number of native speakers' spelling conventions. If the majority (in the world) use 'programme' then that should be the first spelling used and variations should be noted in the text,and logically, vice versa. It's a tricky situation because according to the Manual of Style 'programme' is used in the UK, South Africa, New Zealand with Canada accepting both, whilst in the US and Australia 'program' is preferred. But the number of speakers who use the American spelling is probably greater - though it goes against my English upbringing :).Jayjase.88.5.151.93 (talk) 13:02, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Program has become standard in the UK when referring to computer programs. If talking about a television programme then the alternate spelling is used. --86.54.181.194 (talk) 14:19, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Programme / Program 

message: I did a cleanup according to WP:MOSDAB (overview WP:DABYESNO). It's possible that more of the entries are not solely known as either of the two ambiguous terms. The sections are not in alphabetical order which is OK with me, but given that I'd prefer the Science and technology as the top section. Thoughts? Widefox; talk 23:47, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It's possible that the page has undergone a lot of changes since then, because it's still FAR from the intent of WP:MOSDAB.  I'm going through right now and removing all of the "dictionary definitions," for instance, but there still remains much to do in other regards. -- John (Johnnie Bob (talk) 01:47, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup
Talk:Libertarianism/Page move

message: *Dave (talk) 22:23, July 17, 2005 (UTC).  My reasoning is outlined at talk:libertarianism.  We'd have to change 600 links if we moved it.
*RJII 22:40, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Dictionaries don't generally define "libertarianism" as a form of anarcho-capitalism. Some don't even mention anarcho-capitalism in their definitions of the word. (By anarcho-capitalism, I mean the political philosophy which is the topic of the page as it currently stands). Cadr 12:20, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The topic of the libertarianism page as it currently stands is not anarcho-capitalism; that is the topic of the anarcho capitalism page.  While some libertarians are anarcho-capitalists, not all of them are. --Serge 17:25, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: That half right: the current content of the article is predominantly about anarcho-capitalism and a somewhat generic minarchism. Other specific variants, such as geolibertarianism, get only the briefest of mentions. --RL0919 02:07, 22 July 2005 (UTC)

text: This brings up a good point.  If there was a disambiguation page, what would it reference?  The same things that the top of the current page already references (libertarianism socialism, libertarianism in metaphysics, and "civil libertarianism")?  If so, what problem would the disambiguation page be solving that is not being solved by the current approach? --Serge 22:43, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The problem of neutrality, obviously. Cadr 12:21, 21 July 2005 (UTC)

text: Since I am the one who raised the idea of a disambiguation page this time around (leading to this current proposal), let me note for the record that I am not a "libertarian socialist" or anything close to one. However, I do know the difference between real neutrality versus the sentiments of the majority who attach themselves to a term (some of whom think those sentiments constitute neutrality). --RL0919 02:07, 22 July 2005 (UTC)

text: Describing other people's views as "faux indignation" hardly strikes me as neutral. --RL0919 02:07, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Oppose the move
Talk:Truth/Archive6

message: Dot six, I appreciate the fact that you're an admirer of the Philosophy banner, but it's already been posted three times in this talk page, and doesn't need to be posted in the main article. If you look at the other articles in the WikiProject Philosophy, you'll find that none of the articles put the project banner on the article page. It's not done, it's not necessary, and it makes the page look ugly (the latter is my POV and is not the reason why it should not be up). Wikiproject banners go on the talk pages (see guidelines).
You also insist on putting the NPOV banner up. Could I suggest you replace it with  in the appropriate section, so that the specific area of dispute can be highlighted? — Asbestos | Talk 17:59, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you've been asked before not to edit people's comments. That includes removing section headings in the talk page. — Asbestos | Talk 22:11, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Philosophy banner and NPOV banner
Talk:Google Earth

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Geegle earth. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  TheAwesomeHwyh 19:10, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Geegle earth" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: There is a bug in the info box. In the place where the information for Windows should be gibberish can be found instead: "ighu]95pbkopm3kt4hb kopt;gf jfekrtfghpweydflkuv;u9wjeklrgu bhr3pijkweod" I couldn't find out how to correct this. --Maxl (talk) 22:34, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bug in infobox 

message: Agree, could someone re-instate the list? It is a very useful comparison with Apple maps' 3d flyover locations.
This list must contain only 3d areas and it must be trimmed if these 3d areas are merged. 
I think that the best way forward would be to delete all suburbs of larger settlements from this list, unless those suburbs are major cities themselves (eg. Yokohama is a big city but also a suburb of an even bigger city Tokyo; but the Lawrence suburb of Indianapolis is not a major city). I would also remove all internal divisions of each country except the United States. 86.124.206.135 (talk) 15:09, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of Google Earth 3D areas 

message: When did Google Earth add a weather layer?  I see nothing about it here.  Seems a pretty major oversight, since the past 2 winters the weather has been pretty wild as seen from Google Earth.  Entire continents whited out.  Thetrellan (talk) 18:50, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: If we don't have a third-party source saying that, we can't include it here. And if no source talks about this, it's a good indicator that the change isn't notable. InfiniteNexus (talk) 21:39, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weather layer 

message: The redirect Geegle Earth has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Mia Mahey (talk) 02:13, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Geegle Earth]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Cathy Tyson

message: in cathy tysons page it says she is not related to american actress cicely tyson yet i have just been looking at the british film institute website and it says there that she is her niece....so id like to know whos right,.
I do not think they are related.  However, I have seen one source that says Cicely Tyson's parents immigrated to NYC from Nevis. Winter Maiden (talk) 18:15, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Relation to Cicely Tyson?

message: The first line states she was born in Kingston upon Thames; the infobox states Liverpool. Where was she actually born? F W Nietzsche (talk) 03:37, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Place of birth
Talk:Truth/Archive 5

message: I removed:
The term, 'truth' refers to a statement that is factual. For example, the statement, 'God exists' is true if it is a fact that God exists.
In attempting to achieve clarity, .6 has provided no clarification; A fact is a true statement, so the definition is quite circular. The previous introduction (to which I reverted) does not attempt to define truth, since the body of the article is precisely a discussion of the various definitions, and to place one in the intro would be POV. Instead, this intro sets out that the article is going to discuss a particular use of true. Banno 00:52, July 13, 2005 (UTC)
Archiving the diff here as Troll insurance Ancheta Wis 14:27, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  edits by 67.182.157.6 

message: Shame on you sir!! -- 67.182.157.6 16:07, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [[User:Ancheta Wis|Ancheta Wis]] posting somebody else's email address here for the spam bots to pick up is a breach of netiquette
Talk:Horseshoe Las Vegas

message: How is the name pronounced, is the first part pronouned like ball with ee on the end  or bal with ee on the end?--NeilEvans 19:51, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 

message: I just visited Vegas and shot over 200 pictures, including one of the Bally's property.  My photo is sharper, color balanced, and isn't as washed out (that is, it's not shot straight into the sun like the one on this page).  If no one objects I'm putting in my photo in a week. --Coolcaesar 07:19, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  I would like to replace the image on this page 

message: There is no reason for merging these articles.  The name change delineates a significant change resulting from the fire.  One could argue that under the old name the hotel is clearly more notable, significant and really represents a significantly different property that can be kept as two articles. Vegaswikian (talk) 00:30, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The articles were nearly identical when discussing the old MGM Grand, and the fire is discussed in a separate article entirely which was unaffected.  SchuminWeb (Talk) 11:07, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge? 

message: Perhaps I should have been more clear about this edit. Nothing in the article says that the hotel towers are skyscrapers, so the category is unsourced. Bally's is not listed in that navigation box, so the box is irrelevant here. Are the towers frequently referred to as "skyscrapers"? I did some searches and couldn't find anything. From what I can tell, skyscrapers are generally about 330 feet tall, or 40 stories. The Bally's towers would seem to qualify as high-rises (based on Wikipedia's article) but not specifically as skyscrapers.  AJFU  (talk) 17:41, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Skyscraper
Talk:Inherit the Earth

message: "...humanity was eradicated by an airborne biological weapon (a scenario that was inspired by the Alistair MacLean novel The Satan Bug)."  This is similar to a recent plot revelation in the Sonic the Hedgehog comic book series from Archie Comics.  In that continuity, if I remember correctly, the virus that nearly wiped out humanity on Earth was sent by aliens.  In a twist of fate, many species of Earth's animals were uplifted by the virus to human intelligence. --75.161.84.72 00:19, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Similar plot resolution... 

message: This could move up to WP:FURRY class C if it had a bit more in the way of referencing and coverage of the game's reception. GreenReaper (talk) 01:55, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Third-party refs required
Talk:Vienna Illuminated Chronicle

message: Does anyone has any information about Vienna Illuminated Chronicle manuscript, The image posted in the page is from the manuscript,  the Incunabulum Chronicle of Ján z Turca is very different regarding the images.
It is the below image from Matias Kalt? or where is this manuscript _
I doubt that anybody here is able to answer such a specific question...Juro 23:08, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Shep and the Limelites

message: While I couldn't figure out how to rename the article itself, to be consistent with names of album(s) and singles, I changed "and" to "&", and "the" to "The" within the article. Album covers of the time reflect the ampersand was part of the actual name.
For Example: http://www.oldies.com/artist-biography/Shep-and-The-Limelites.html or a search at a CD store, such as Amazon, etc.
Misty MH (talk) 03:08, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Name change
Talk:Independence Party of Alberta

message: This page, particularly the recent history portion, seems totally biased in support of the party. I think it needs heavy cleanup.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.146.150.0 (talk) 00:21, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Bias

message: I'm taking out what you added to the first line, buckets.  I think that it does not add much and ends up contradicting the point made about the party being a reaction to the 2000 election.
:OK.  I see your point.Buckets 23:11, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Imai Hisashi

message: Possible copyvio along with Buck-Tick. — Ilγαηερ (Tαlκ) 23:29, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Specifically, text off the Buck-Tick Zone website: 1983, 1984. Tearlach 02:05, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I was looking for where it was from. I suppose we have to put a copyvio tag. The images might be copyvio too . — Ilγαηερ (Tαlκ) 03:54, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Artemidoros Aniketos

message: An image of coin with the title "Son of Maues" is unavailable AFAIK, but it was published by the Oriental Numismatic Society  by R C Senior in 1999.
There is IMHO little reason to believe that the two were related. No Greek king has to my knowledge struck a similar coin - Artemidoros merely expresses reverence, in a style similar to the Confucian hegemony which was certainly known to the nomads. ("I am your grandfather!" was quite an insult in classic China). The regnal date has to be adjusted accordingly, though only with 5 years which of course is a minor change given the general insecurity for all datings.
--Sponsianus 23:50, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Angel's share

message: This is a very basic article that needs to have more detail, explanation, and perhaps some data tables add. Sweetfreek 00:00, 18 July 2005 (UTC)

message: I would say that this is not very stubby, and that it is an adequate explanation of the topic. Perhaps more examples could be brought in, but I think that this article is close to completion. RSido 21:19, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stub?
Talk:Almroth Wright

message: I believe someone may have changed the reference to "Scientific American"
The point that was made earlier was not whether or not he wrote in scientific magazines, which he undoubtedly did,
but that his principles of medicine where being rediscovered about 50 years after he died, and nearly a century after he stated them.
The dangers which now lead to a global increase in infections in some cases could have been avoided.
After one of his followers, Sir Alexander Fleming, discovered peniccilin, antibiotics became a panacea for all ailments, and germs that resist antibiotics are now making it increasingly harder to combat diseases.
This is in fact, the reason that he is still remembered. Not for what he once did, but for what medicine could STILL learn from him.
DanielDemaret 00:13, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The introductory paragraph to this article has been lifted almost word-for-word from the Encyclopaedia Britannica (2004) entry on Almroth Wright. I suggest it be deleted immediately and someone should start over with a new introduction. It is remarkable that this text in the Wikipedia has existed at least going back to 2005 without detection.
E. B. article starts out as follows:
"British bacteriologist and immunologist best known for advancing vaccination through the use of autogenous vaccines (prepared from the bacteria harboured by the patient) and through antityphoid immunization with typhoid bacilli killed by heat."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.160.143.176 (talk) 23:02, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Very nice catch! I've removed this material and we'll need to write a new intro. Feel free to delete any other portions of the article that are plagiarized. I'm looking now to see who added this. Zachlipton (talk) 23:18, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Article contains plagiarism

message: I've made a vectorized signature from this CV. AFAIK, the JPG is under copyright but free access - so is the signature eligible for upload at WC? The CV was written 1930/31 and Wright died in 1947, so the copyright will anyway expire in 2 years time in countries with "70 years after death" copyright laws. Vivrax (talk) 15:21, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Signature
Talk:I'm a Loser

message: Video on Trial's verdict about Paris Hilton is NOT actual; therefore please DON'T put a picture of her. --Addict 2006 07:19, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Video on Trial

message: Thanks for uploading or contributing to :Image:Beatles loser.ogg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Papa November 22:12, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for [[:Image:Beatles loser.ogg]]

message: The comment about there being no overdubs is contradicted by the listed personnel, where Ringo is credited as playing drums and tambourine.  Either there were overdubs, or someone else played the tambourine.  The former seems more likely, and I have altered the text accordingly.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tony Keen2 (talk • contribs) 15:01, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overdubs 

message: Added just an observation from Hertsgaard on the place of this song in Lennon's ongoing evolution. --Daveler16 (talk) 18:57, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lennon maturity 
Talk:ROM (MUD)

message: Mad ROM one of the more significant offshoots of the ROM II code base is still running.  It's notable in that it was splintered off of the old cie-2.uoregon.edu trunk, but hosted on Zump's computer for a while along side a more mature ROM II branch.  There are a lot of modifications, but a number of them are cosmetic, the actual base is very close to ROM II.  Zump even forwarded the DNS mad.rom.org to the new machine.  I think it's interesting in that it's a kind of fossil, or time capsule.  The game play hasn't really changed since the late 80s.  The nature of this mud might begin to change as the new Implimentors while working slowly are using code versioning, and are quite a bit more sophisticated in their apporach to the code base than has typically been the case in the past.  It seems that this older version should have some sort of mention, though I'm not confident in the form it should take.--Insancipitory (talk) 10:28, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Major early ROM 2 varient

message: See Talk:Merc (MUD) - DikuMUD is a better redirect as the parent codebase than a specific Diku derivative.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Etmoonshade (talk • contribs) 15:24, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Setting better redirect.
Talk:Edgar Breau

message: If you knew anything about Breau's politics, his being active in the Family Coalition Party would not seem so improbable. Despite his music being admittedly quite radical, his political views tend towards a sort of right wing Catholicism along the lines of Mel Gibson or Pat Buchanan.
*I'm (somewhat) aware of Breau's philosophical background, but I still think the fact of a Canadian punk pioneer running for the FCP qualifies as "improbable".  
*If you really want to change the wording, though ... CJCurrie 02:20, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled