lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:TIA-568A

message: This part of the RJ-45 article:
:“The original concept (presumably RJ11, RJ14, RJ25 and RJ61) was that the centre two pins would be one pair, the next two out the second pair, and so on until the outer pins of an eight-pin connector would be the fourth twisted pair. Additionally, signal shielding was optimised by alternating the "live" and "earthy" pins of each pair. This standard for the eight-pin connector results in a pinout known as TIA-568A, but the outermost pair are then too far apart to meet the electrical requirements of high-speed LAN protocols. The variation known as TIA-568B overcomes this by using adjacent pairs of the outer four pins for the third and fourth pairs. The inner four pins are wired identically to TIA-568A.”
seems to suggest that the normal wiring of TIA-568A should be:
#  white/brown
#  green/white
#  white/orange
#  blue/white
#  white/blue
#  orange/white
#  white/green
#  brown/white
(with pairs 2 and 3 swapped for 10/100Base-T crossover wiring), while according to the diagram in TIA-568A article it is actually:
#  white/green
#  green/white
#  white/orange
#  blue/white
#  white/blue
#  orange/white
#  white/brown
#  brown/white
which, incidently, is exactly the same as TIA-568B crossover wiring according to the diagram in TIA-568B article (and vice versa, TIA-568A crossover is TIA-568B normal wiring).
I am going to merge TIA-568A and TIA-568B articles for they differ only with the order of wires, whatever it is, but first I want to know whether the original diagrams which I have based the tables on are correct. They (the TIA-568A ones) seem to be incorrect in the context of RJ-45 article, unless the latter itself is incorrect. In any case, they both appear to be mutually contradictory and need to be corrected.
Rafał Pocztarski 07:31, 30 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: “The variation known as TIA-568B overcomes this by using adjacent pairs of the outer four pins for the third and fourth pairs. The inner four pins are wired identically to TIA-568A.”
which is not true according to the TIA-568A diagram and table:
#  white/green
#  green/white
#  white/orange
#  blue/white
#  white/blue
#  orange/white
#  white/brown
#  brown/white
and TIA-568B diagram and table:
#  white/orange
#  orange/white
#  white/green
#  blue/white
#  white/blue
#  green/white
#  white/brown
#  brown/white
i.e. the inner four pins in TIA-568B are not wired identically to TIA-568A.
Most probably, the quoted paragraph from RJ45 is incorrect.
Rafał Pocztarski 02:54, 1 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: TIA-568A and RJ-45 inconsistency
Talk:Siarnaq

message: Heard back from Michael Kusugak, who proposed the name. NASA had given the pronunciation as "syar-NAK" in a press release, with the accent messed up (which happens surprisingly often). Michael said, 
"You are right about the accents. Kiviuq is pronounced Ki' vi uq (kee' vee oq, the q is gutteral, pronounced in the back of the tongue). Paw' lee ahq, See' ar nahq and Ee' ye rahq." 
Actually, the Inuit 'r' is also "gutteral" (uvular), rather like the French 'r'. kwami 06:05, 14 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  follow up 

message: I've just uploaded an audio recording of the article. Please let me know if I've mispronounced anything. :-) --Mangst (talk) 20:04, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: As far as I know, "Sedna" comes from/"is the same as" "sanna", though I'm not sure of the exact relationship. (Dialect spelling? Older orthographic conventions?) -- pne (talk) 11:48, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spoken Wikipedia recording 

message: When I looked up the links in the former version both were broken. However now is a bit on the short side regarding sources. Which is even worse as the article about Saturnian satellites also is not so reliable concerning the inclinations of the Unuit group. However at least Cuk and Burns 2004 (currently cite no. 10) give good estimates. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GGGBerlin (talk • contribs) 14:07, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of broken links
Talk:TIA-568B

message: Please see Talk:TIA-568A#TIA-568A and RJ-45 inconsistency.
Rafał Pocztarski 07:34, 30 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: TIA-568A and RJ-45 inconsistency

message: "The fastest way to tell whether you have a crossover cable is to compare the colors at each end.  If their sequences are different, it is a crossover cable.  If they match, it is not." —Sean κ. ⇔ 00:12, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: if they match then its not a crossover cable. If they don't match then its most likely a crossover cable but could also be a cable wired for some other strange application or simply a miswired cable. Plugwash 09:15, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this true? (it seems like it might be nice to note)
Talk:Telesto (moon)

message: NASA contradicts itself on the diameter, giving 34x28x26 and 30x25x15 on the same page. Maybe someone who has access to more reliable data can correct? kwami 09:42, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  diameter 

message: The article says it is synchronous. Is this known or assumed? Deuar 21:30, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rotation 

message: Do we know what the reason behind the smoothness of its surface is? -- Cimon Avaro; on a pogostick. (talk) 18:16, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Smoothness 

message: I've just uploaded an audio recording of the article. Please let me know if I've mispronounced anything. :-) --Mangst (talk) 21:09, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spoken Wikipedia recording 
Talk:Helene (moon)

message: The name Helene has three syllables, [[--122.57.249.43 (talk) 01:32, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Since the penult is light in the Greek (open syllable, short vowel), traditional literary English (Latinate) stress rules would place the stress on the antepenult. --kwami 02:36, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The Cassini-Huygens web page has [hell EEN], but they still don't have all the names of the moons spelled right! —kwami 06:46, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've just uploaded an audio recording of the article. Please let me know if I've mispronounced anything. :-) --Mangst (talk) 16:32, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spoken Wikipedia recording 

message: dated 2011-06-18. - Denimadept (talk) 17:48, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  New images 
Talk:The Oracle (The Matrix)

message: removed stub boilerplate text, mainly because the article doesnt seem like a stub any longer.  feel free to add it back, but the page is pretty in-depth.  Applegoddess 07:48, 30 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub

message: Made a little change to the article, including some information already sourced in the Matrix Online article (Paradise and Nightmare versions of the Matrix etc). Also noticed that the article argues its own point about the Oracle's foresight a bit too much, so made a few small changes to give balance (I hope) there. Oposie (talk) 20:52, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  MINOR EDIT
Talk:I packed my bag

message: Imagine the following hypothetical dialog:
<I>HUMAN: Do you know how to play the game "I packed my bag?"</I><BR>
<I>PROGRAM: I am famiiliar with all kinds of knapsack problems.</I><BR>
<I>HUMAN: I mean the car game.  Do you know the one?</I><BR>
<I>PROGRAM: Yes, I know that one. I leared it as a child.  I packed my bag and put in 40 digits of pi.</I><BR> 
<I>HUMAN: I packed my bag and put 3.14151926535897932384626433832795028841971, along with a zero knowledge proof that OJ was innocent.</I><BR>
<I>PROGRAM: I dont believe that such a proof exists.</I><BR>
Now suppose that the dialog extends for quite some time, until the HUMAN fails to keep up.  Is the PROGRAM really a program, which has passed the Turing test, or is this script made up? Of course, this script is just a made up example of a possible dialog between an examiner and some future hypothetical simulation of conversation.  However, a major failing of Eliza type programs is a lack of real world knowledge.  One thing that might change that is the existence of a project like the Wiki, which could in principle be used as a database for some type of Artificial Intelligence applications.
That works in principle for so called declarative knowledge, however reasoning and thinking presumably involve procedural paradigms.  There is something very strange therefore about "I packed my bag" and where it belongs, because this should be a very simple game to implement, in that it simply involves alternatetly adding elements to a list.
Someone should therefore write an "I Packed My Bag" game that uses the Wiki as a database for things that the computer-player might decide to put in the bag.  Then when a player asks a certain bot about the game, then the human player would be in for quite a surprise!  That is because the player would quickly find that the computer player has a great deal of knowledge about a wide variety of subjects.  It is espescially desirable if such a program 1) uses the Wiki SQL data files as a knowledge source, 2) the program is capable of making commentary about the items in the list.  It is even more desirable if the application is distributed as a part of an open source collabaration project of AI applications.
Lazarus666 07:59, 30 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Janus (moon)

message: The NASA moons profiles page gives the middle diameter as both 190 and 192 km. Can someone who has access to reliable data verify? kwami 09:53, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: diameter

message: See:  --TheFEARgod (Ч) 15:09, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks great to me, especially the colour version over at Kheider's page. We should stick that cropped version in the infobox, and push the old Voyager image further down into the text. Deuar 16:14, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  New image 

message: While I have not found definitive evidence that Voyager 1 "confirmed" Janus as being a moon on March 1, 1980, I have found what I consider overwhelming evidence to prove the Voyager 1 was nowhere near Janus on that date.
Voyager 1 image of Janus
The above image was taken on November 12, 1980 at a distance of just over 600,000 km. I have found several pictures of Janus all taken on or about that date. If Voyager 1 was traveling at 3.6 au per year (just shy of a million miles a day), on March 1st, Voyager 1 would have been some 225,000,000 miles away from Janus (give or take). That's more than 6 times the distance from Earth to Mars at it's closest approach. How could Voyager 1 have accomplished such a feat? Kentholke (talk) 00:43, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  March 1, 1980 

message: I've just uploaded an audio recording of the article. Please let me know if I've mispronounced anything. :-) --Mangst (talk) 01:31, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spoken Wikipedia recording 

message: consider removing the animations of the "rotating frame" taken out of context of a paper,they don't change directions they exchange speed and distance from Jupiter  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.170.179.225 (talk) 16:58, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  rotating frame garbage animations
Talk:Ymir (moon)

message: Norse pronunciation ['y.mir]. Guides give ['i.mir] (ee'-meer) as a variant, as English does not have [y]. However, English phonotactics do not allow the second syllable to have a long vowel, so this is still not fully assimilated into English. A fully assimilated pronunciation would be ee'-mur, homophonous with "emir" for those of us who stress that word on the first syllable. --kwami 06:06, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: /y/ has become /i/ in Icelandic, which is often used as a guide to pronouncing Old Norse names.  kwami 04:02, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciation
Talk:Exarchate of Ravenna

message: "...the exarch...was the representative at Ravenna of the Patriarch of Constantinople..." — shouldn't that be of the Emperor? m.e. 09:23, 30 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that's right. Wetman 11:03, 30 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: How is the Exarchate of Ravenna known as the Excharate of Italy?Mk5384 (talk) 10:31, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Of Italy? 

message: Seems to be either quoting source materials or a personalized summation, it has almost no sources.  may need to be cleaned up for tone and accuracy. Schnurrfles (talk) 18:28, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  exharchate section needs sources 
Talk:Tony Frangieh

message: The international media, as well as the English-language Lebanese media, most commonly spell Frangieh's name with a G, not a J.  Neither spelling is wrong, as they are but transpositions of Arabic letters, but unless there is a good reason otherwise, it is best to stick with the spelling most commonly used. I have reverted the page move. David Cannon 13:57, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I see.  Two factors to consider: Other members of the family on Wikipedia are spelt with a G, and the Lebanon Wire newsagency (from which I have derived a significant proportion of the information used on Wikipedia) uses that spelling too. David Cannon 05:32, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name spelling
Talk:Greenery Press

message: There's very little in the way of secondary sources to work from, however, the Cuir Underground article and the SFGate/Chronicle article, plus a few easily observed things such as the number of titles.  I have  tried to simplify the flow of the article as it exists, add a few facts that I have good secondary sources of, remove some redundancies in the links.
As for the flow, I wanted to collapse information about the company history and operation to it's own paragraph, ditto the list of some of the Press's notable authors.  What other information can I get on GP from secondary sources, any ideas?  --Joe Decker 08:13, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Looking at expanding this article 

message: The official site now directs to a generic looking porn site.  Anyone have a current status for this company?  Thanks. Surv1v4l1st ╠Talk║Contribs╣ 19:09, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current status?
Talk:Belfast South (UK Parliament constituency)

message: There may have been talk of the DUP taking the Westminster seat, but only from DUP spinmeisters.  Look at the Assembly election results.  This is the last majority Unionist seat in NI the DUP could take.  Gerry Lynch 09:58, 30 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Looking at it again I guess you're right, though the DUP vote has risen. Mind you with the recent state of things severe pessimism about the UUP's chances anywhere can set in. Timrollpickering 10:22, 30 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it looks like we were both sort of wrong Tim!  Gerry Lynch 17:57, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Belfast North (UK Parliament constituency)

message: Not a safe Unionist seat in the long term (and my home constituency FWIW)! Gerry Lynch 10:00, 30 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The BBC reports here that the 2001 General Election majority for North Belfast was 11,814.  This is incorrect. 80N 23:27, Apr 27, 2005 (UTC)
:I presume someone calculated the difference between the party who previously held the seat and the new party - nominally a sensible thing to do but given the seismic shift in votes not here! It's easy to carry forward such errors. Timrollpickering 23:47, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  BBC Error 

message: Looking to dab Daniel Dixon elected 1905, was he the father of Herbert Dixon, 1st Baron Glentoran?  I set him up as Daniel Dixon, 1st Baronet Ballymenock on the dab page (changes to that article name welcome if it ought to be something else). -- Kevin Ryde 23:05, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Daniel Dixon 
Talk:Sycorax (moon)

message: Sycorax appears light red (Retting 2001, Grav 2003, see refs for irregular satellites). When Sycorax indices have been measured they contrasted with  Jupiter's neutral moons. Since then, it does not seem that Sycorax is considered exceptional anymore and KBO connection has weekened. Reference to the contrary are welcome. Eurocommuter 09:03, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colour
Talk:Caliban (moon)

message: Article said 98.723°. Looks bogus since even the rotation period is unknown, not to mention the ridiculous precision. Removing pending a reference. Deuar 22:47, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Axial tilt 

message: * Sycorax follows a distant orbit ...
* Sycorax is hypothesized to be ...
It's Caliban, or not?--Xabier Cancela (talk) 20:04, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: My but it is by sky bottom of to copy stick. They made an article for Syco ' and resume the same nothing there in nor putting Calib ' and some figures on the place. Times they forget to change everything. Need which drop clanger! --Jean-François Clet (talk) 15:40, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: ??? I don't understand... 220.255.1.173 (talk) 04:53, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Sycorax or Caliban? Caliban
Talk:Portia (moon)

message: According to the article, Portia is named after a character in Shakespeare's The Merchant of Venice. The reference given for this piece of information is a link to the USGS Astrogeology's Gazetteer of planetary names, etc. But on the linked page, it says that Portia is named after the Wife of Brutus in Shakespeare's "Julius Caesar"! Eroica (talk) 15:38, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of Name
Talk:Cordelia (moon)

message: This article states that Cordelia is the inner shepherd of the epsilon ring. However, according to the table at Rings of Uranus, it is actually inside 1986 U1R, not the epsilon ring. Are those distances off, or does this article need to be corrected? kwami 20:16, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  epsilon shepherd? 

message: The article says it is synchronous. Has someone actually measured this with lightcurves or somehow, or is it assumed? Is it so close to Uranus that the assumption is almost certain? I wonder the same for the remaining inner Uranus moons out to Mab. Deuar 21:42, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rotation 

message: Cordelia is mentioned in Roche limit. The proximity of Cordelia to its limit could be mentioned on this page. JDAWiseman (talk) 12:16, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roche limit
Talk:Larissa (moon)

message: The image of Larissa is too small. –anon.
:Too bad, because it is the only existing image which shows any surface details on Larissa. Still it's far better than nothing or a crude simulated image.--Jyril 00:41, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The image of Larissa says front and back. Judging from the two images this has to be false. Voyager never had the opportunity to take images of both hemispheres and both pictures look almost identical (same features, just taken at slightly different moments and distances).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.222.201.190 (talk) 14:41, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Front and back?
Talk:Galatea (moon)

message: The simulated view of Galatea could be misleading, as the model used for Galatea is a generic asteroid mesh rather than a model of Galatea. Chaos syndrome 15:11, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Displayed image

message: The article says "...shows no sign of any geological modification..." AFAIK the best images of Galatea are only a few pixels wide, so that statement sounds absurd. Of course, the moon is tiny that any (internal) geological activity is impossible.--Jyril 20:34, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Same applies to other small Neptunian satellite articles expect for Larissa and Proteus, which have better images.--Jyril 20:36, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: They all appear to be headed for destruction too, which seems pretty unusual. Could Triton be slowing them down as well as their sub-synchronous orbits? 209.93.141.17 (talk) 00:23, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Geological activity
Talk:Thalassa (moon)

message: :Relatively soon after, the overlapping debris will enter into Despina's orbit
Interesting, but is it true? Why would this happen, since Despina's orbit is about 2000 km outide of Thalassa's? Are impacts between the fragments expected to be sufficiently energetic to shift the orbits of a significant portion ub by this amount? Deuar 16:14, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Debris after crossing the Roche limit

message: I posted this here and at Naiad. I saw the image at NASA and contacted them, and they (Stphen Edberg) sent me an email reply with " IAU Name Discovery
III Naiad S/1989 N6 IV Thalassa S/1989 N5 V Despina S/1989 N3 "
They intend to fix it, and when the do the image here should be updated. TeigeRyan (talk) 02:51, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Image Correction
Talk:Samut Prakan province

message: Hello SP users,
Was wondering if there was any info available, or common knowledge regarding migrant workers/ children.  Especially in regards to Samut Chedi and Phra Pradaeng, but other amphoes intersting as well.  Population figures, birth rates, school enrollment etc.
cheers
Hello Andreas, we have a problem. I just read this in today's nation:
Construction of Studio International will begin on a 200-rai plot of land in Samut Prakan's Bang Krajao district in January, Pimol said. The plot is adjacent to the Chao Phya River.
see: link
I cannot find that district! Maybe they reformed the districts again?? Waerth 10:33, 30 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Relax :-) Bang Krajao is the peninsula opposite of Bangkok harbour, which now becomes a public park with orchards belonging to local people . Thus hardly enough population to make it a new Amphoe. And Samutprakan.go.th still has a small map with the original 6 Amphoe at the bottom. Thus probably a sloppy translation, maybe they better translated it by "Bang Krajao area". andy 22:08, 31 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: July 2004
Talk:Naiad (moon)

message: :Since its orbit is below Neptune's synchronous orbit radius it is slowly decaying due to tidal forces
Ok, but this doesn't look very significant since it relies on the pull from tidal bulges in Neptune's atmosphere induced by Naiad itself, which are small. Than again, does anyone have any quantitative data - like how fast is the decay, or maybe just how the decay rate scales with the satellite's mass and orbital radius? Deuar 14:04, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  orbit decay 

message: Is it possible that it has crossed the Roche limit? Lanthanum-138 (talk) 06:31, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It's now been rediscovered: see . Also, it's not very likely IMHO that it would have done so and broken apart within just the 22 years between its discovery in 1989 and my comment here. Double sharp (talk) 11:32, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I do wonder however whether its distinctly elongated shape is not so much due to being a rubble pile that hasn't undergone any kind of settling into a quasi-spherical shape, but more that it's already on its way to destruction, and we're seeing it in the intial stages where it becomes ever more stretched-out but hasn't yet begun to actually disintegrate (see the diagrams on the Roche limit page). Then again, it may already be partly broken up, and only losing significant mass intermittently, maybe on the order of lumps fracturing off and floating away every few decades, maybe in sync with closer approaches as its orbit varies - how could we properly tell, without keeping a steady watch from fairly close up or dedicating a good bit of hubble/etc time to look for changes to the moon itself and any debris pulling away from it? 209.93.141.17 (talk) 00:15, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Gone missing

message: I will post this here and at Thlassa.  I saw the image at NASA and contacted them, and they (Stphen Edberg) sent me an email reply with "
IAU        Name                    Discovery
III            Naiad                    S/1989 N6
IV            Thalassa               S/1989 N5
V             Despina                S/1989 N3 "
They intend to fix it, and wen the do the image should be updated. TeigeRyan (talk) 02:33, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I updated articles. Ruslik_Zero 20:28, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Image correction