lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Specific energy

message: The following statement was removed because it does not seem to be universal. At best it may be a convention adopted by some authors in some fields.
:These intensive properties are each symbolized by using the lower case letter of the symbol for the corresponding extensive property, which is symbolized by a capital letter.  For example, the extensive thermodynamic property enthalpy is symbolized by H; specific enthalpy is symbolized by h.  
If this is an official guideline of some institution, it should be presented as such.  Note that such technical writing guidelines are never legally binding (nor even within the country where they may be issued) and authors are always free to follow or disregard them. --Jorge Stolfi (talk) 13:23, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notational convention 

message: A reference list showing a range of values for typical systems/substances would be useful here. For instance, the vanadium redox battery links here in an jnfobox, which implies that one could gain some sense of what the 10–20 Wh/kg means on this page (beyomd the obvious dimensional analysis.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.26.48.213 (talk) 13:33, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference list 

message: The mole isn't non-dimensional according to my understanding; it has units of mol. It's one of the SI base units. Saying it is non-dimensional is like saying that mass is non-dimensional because it depends on the mass of the international prototype kilogram in the same way the mole depends on the Avogadro constant. And, unlike the prototype kilogram, the Avogadro constant is defined in terms of the Planck constant and several other measured and defined quantities. Roches (talk) 22:37, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dimensionality of the mole 

message: I wonder if there should be mention of the related, but not quite the same, quantity: specific impulse.  This is most commonly used in the case of rocket and jet engines.  It is thrust*time/mass, or maybe more often, thrust*time/weight.  The latter results in a quantity with units of time (s), in either metric or non-metric units.  (More specifically, I believe the denominator is mass*standard g.)  In the case of rockets, both fuel and oxidizer are included, for jet engines, only fuel is included. Gah4 (talk) 18:09, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[specific impulse]]
Talk:Massic kinetic energy

message: I know you're not supposed to edit wikipedia information if you don't know what you're talking about, but a function should always define it's terms. And based upon my high school physics, this should be what they mean? I also added in mass, because the equation as was did not give Joules per kilogram.  90.206.12.75 (talk) 17:05, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I realised what was wrong. Specific Kinetic Energy should really be a redirect to Kinetic Energy. 90.196.125.18 (talk) 18:43, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Specific volume

message: There is a much more descriptive section in that page for specific volume. Instead of this basically empty page with no sources, it should just redirect there instead... 67.165.206.187 (talk) 21:39, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect to Volume (thermodynamics) 

message: This article states the Ideal Gas Law is PV = mRT. Click on the link to ideal gas and there the Ideal Gas Law is PV = nRT. In the first case m is a mass and in the second case n is the number of moles. The problem relates to the constant R which should be the specific gas constant in this article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.220.225.222 (talk) 18:20, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ideal Gas Law Stated Incorrectly 

message: This term is a recent obfuscation by engineers who apparently are not comfortable with the simplicity of using density.  In the past, small v referred to the "molar volume" , v=V/N, which has more useful meaning in derivation; not simply creating a pointless extra engineering variable as nothing more than the inverse of the density.Wikibearwithme (talk) 04:00, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have a reference for this? RJFJR (talk) 17:49, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  perversion of terminology by engineers 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Orders of magnitude (specific volume). Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Utopes (talk / cont) 22:54, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Orders of magnitude (specific volume)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: 1/1.225 = 0.8163— Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.221.90.146 (talk) 13:14, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Specific volume of air
Talk:Reactions to On the Origin of Species

message: "Huxley reported of Kingsley that 'He is an excellent Darwinian to begin with, and told me a capital story of his reply to Lady Aylesbury'" -- I posted to Talk:Aylesbury (disambiguation): "I'm unable to find any Wikipedia article which seems an appropriate link for Lady Aylesbury. Can anyone help out with this?", and received the reply "Try Marquess of Ailesbury.  Alternatively there is also a page, Reynold Heatherington, Lord Aylesbury, however no pages link to it, and the page Lord Aylesbury doesn't exist yet." -- Roleplayer 13:21, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Identity of Lady Aylesbury 

message: A series on the worldwide reaction to Darwin's theory was published in NAture recently, AND I Thought I'd add some of the info here. Where do I put it, though innotata (Talk | Contribs) (talk) 21:37, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this meant from the Nature 2009 Opinion articles
* 29 Oct 2009 Global Darwin: Eastern enchantment
* 5 Nov 2009  Global Darwin: Contempt for competition
* 11 Nov 2009 Global Darwin: Revolutionary road
* 18 Nov 2009 Global Darwin: Multicultural mergers
Markbassett (talk) 14:04, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  worldwide reaction 

message: Not seeing the narrative connection too much or chronology out further, where it seems almost predictable ways of then like now how things unfolded.  Each viewpoint brings forward what their local view is, and particularly where they have a problem or motivational differences, and skipping forward to latest rather than an overall or finishing the point.  (It hasn't changed much how folks make their mark or that they want to do so.  "Me too" isn't really useful or print-worthy, and being third in a discussion will not be as big as starting a new one.)  I'm seeing the relationship flowing from prior event rather than Origins per se, narrative of events like so:
* Botanist buddy Gray immediately gives approving revieww 
* Other department in Harvard, the Zooologist chief Assize differs
* Spencer reworks the language into "Survival of the fittest"
* Other school than Harvard, Yale inputs but to that presentation ...
I'm thinking the article should stick to simply the timeline rather than trying to catch the narrative plots of why too much, but thought I'd Talk to make that explicit for review - any thoughts regarding all this ?  Markbassett (talk) 14:20, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Narrative plots
Talk:Spectral imaging

message: Merger proposals have languished for years, and I think should not be carried out, since there are so many spectral imaging articles.  Better to move the introductory material from those articles into here, and link to those articles for their treatment of distinctive methods and applications of "Full", "Super", "Multi", "Hyper", "Chemical" and whatever other varieties may be separately notable.  Jim.henderson (talk) 15:10, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Spinthariscope

message: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/12/15/21117.aspx
FancyPants 22:27, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Media Reference to article

message: Is there any danger from any of these devices? Bizzybody (talk) 10:01, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Radiation?
Talk:Stress relaxation

message: The plot is wrong. The two points on the vertical axis should be \sigma_0 / E_1 and similarly for the other point, not \sigma_0 * E_1.
also, the plot says "strain", when it is clearly plotting stress (sigma) 64.30.3.122 (talk) 00:32, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

message: The text states the following : 
\sigma(t)= \frac { \sigma_0 }{ 1-[1-(t/t*)(1^{1-n})]}
But this relation is obviously wrong because of the 1^{1-n} that is totally useless. From the 1965 paper of Obukhov (The Relationship Between Stress and Deformation of Polymers in the Linear Stress State, Mekhanika Polimerov, Vol. 1, No. 5, pp. 25-29, 1965) he proposes the following :
\sigma_0 = \sigma(t) \left( 1 - \left( 1-\left( \frac{t_{in}}{t}\right)^{n}\right)^{1-n} \right) 
But this serves for stress relaxation after an instantaneous loading and unloading. 
213.137.179.49 (talk) 08:54, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Obukhov relation is wrong
Talk:Small Voice

message: I added some links to existing wiki pages for some songs that I can easily verify. For example, I know that Lea Salonga did sing the Rescuers song because we have a copy of this song (it's on the B-side of the single for "I Am But a Small Voice"). If anyone has more information about the other songs, please feel free to add them. --- Tito Pao 18:03, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional Song Information 
Talk:String cosmology

message: Well I am not familiar with the string theorem. However the integrals in section "Technical Detais " seem to miss something, the derivative (dx, dz ?). I'll call the editor. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 14:20, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: There is nothing missing in the integrals. You have d^2z in the first and d^Dx in the following twos. Please, check carefully.--Pra1998 (talk) 18:23, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Integrals
Talk:Toxicroak

message: Dokurog's English name has been announced: Toxicroak.
:Bulbapedia is a wiki and thus fails WP:RS, as does Serebii (whom everyone else cites). -Jeske (v^_^v) 02:02, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

message: Let's wait until Diamond and Pearl is out so we can know the REAL names! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sonic,Pikachu,and Snorunt (talk • contribs) 00:23, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You aren't.  I gave the user an NPA warning for that threat. -Jeske (v^_^v) 00:08, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Let's Wait<:)
Talk:Anthracycline

message: There is a mistake - idarubicin has no methoxy group at C-4 position (4-demethoxydaunorubicin). Please correct this mistake, because in these pictures there's no difference between daunorubicin and idarubicin.
:Fixed here. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 18:28, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Idarubicin structure

message: eg: In 2016 GPX-150 was granted Orphan Drug designation by US FDA.Investigational Sarcoma Drug GPX-150 Gets Orphan Drug Designation. 2016
- Rod57 (talk) 00:30, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  New ones in clinical trials 

message: I think it's classically described as decreased ejection fraction ultimately leading to dilated cardiomyopathy.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.228.106.37 (talk) 18:02, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  cardiotoxicity
Talk:Super Dual Auroral Radar Network

message: it appears that this is the right place to put this so...
my name is darn.
super darn. 50.205.48.18 (talk) 13:36, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  well darn
Talk:Super low frequency

message: What is the teddybaer?--Nollieheelflip
Can anyone explain how we can transmit in this range (e.g. 100 HZ would require a trasmitter of 3000km long (300,000km / 100) wouldn't it? How do we get around this issue?) Amilnerwhite (talk) 23:48, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Superlattice

message: There is a bit of ambiguity whether superlattice refers to equilibrium crystal structures (such as the NaCl-structure, which is a superlattice of the simple cubic structure), or artificial periodic layers. To me as a condensed matter physicist the first meaning is primary, while I do see that for, e.g., the semiconductor community this is different. As it is, all paragraphs apart from the Discovery understand the second meaning. I think that at least for the introduction the ambiguity should be clarified, and it would be nice if also the following paragraphs clearly state which of those two aspects the discuss. Common to both aspects is that if you keep the positions of all atoms fixed but randomly exchange the elements, you get some underlying fundamental lattice, while if you consider also the occupations of the atomic sites, you have a longer repeating distance. This should go into the introduction. Of course, with artificial superlattices you have also lattice constant differences (not to speak of arrays of quantum dots), so it seems that the first meaning is the only valid one in the strict sense of the word. Seattle Jörg (talk) 08:43, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Equilibrium/artificial 

message: Superstructure Doesn't it worth to make a common article for this kind of structures? There is also a relationship with articles where multilayer optical devices are mentioned.--193.146.9.175 (talk) 11:04, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Superstructure article
Talk:New England Cable News

message: How is this station still on the air?  It can only be for propaganda purposes since it's rating are so low that it is as if the station does not exist.  Who is watching this station?  I think it is a foolish invention and propaganda of Comcast New England.  Comcast seems to think that what Boston does, CT does.  Boston has nothing to do with CT as CT is in the New York City region.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.115.236.104 (talk) 20:58, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Low Ratings
Talk:Charlotte Coleman

message: It's not appropriate to say "she is missed by all" because this is an encyclopaedia. This language would be ok in an obituary, but it is too subjective here.
89.168.23.241 15:08, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "missed by all"

message: Only one appearance in The Bill is shown; however there was at least one more. Some time after about 1998 she appeared in a two-part story in which her real-life sister Lisa played her on-screen sister. I forget the character names. One of the characters - possibly that played by Charlotte - died during the second episode. --Redrose64 (talk) 20:37, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Bill 

message: The one posted here is simply abysmal.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.138.95.24 (talk) 09:32, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better photo?
Talk:List of civil parishes in Scotland by county in 1975

message: Why has this been moved to ... in 1975? This is a list of civil parishes from the 2001 census, grouped together by county. Owain (talk) 18:23, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: These are the counties as at 1975? As listed in the other article List of civil parishes in Scotland? MRSC 18:25, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The counties still exist for registration and other purposes, just not for local government. Being as the civil parishes don't exist for local government either I don't see what the problem is. Owain (talk) 18:30, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It doesn't matter what census you are reading, the county boundaries are those in 1975; as explained in List of civil parishes in Scotland, which lists the same data in a different order. What have you got to gain from making the information less clear? MRSC 07:37, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I know the county boundaries are the same as in 1975, I am not disputing that, the point I am making is that the data on the page is from the 2001 census, not from 1975. I am attempting to put population data from the 2001 census in there too (using Template:Scottish civil parish), but there seems to be a limit of 75 transclusions on the page, which is preventing it from working. The "in 1975" part of the title would suggest that the data is from 1975, whereas it is in fact from 2001. Owain (talk) 11:01, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Andrew Avellino

message: Presumably this is San Paolo Maggiore. But it would need checking, and I can’t instantly confirm it. —Ian Spackman (talk) 09:32, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shrine 
Talk:Alicia Masters

message: This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article.  If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class.  The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject.  Comics-awb (talk) 11:28, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: B-Class Assesment required

message: I think the article should be as specific as possible regarding which versions have been Caucasian or African-American or Other.  Is she black in JUST the live-action films and the World's Greatest Heroes series?  Because it seems to me this goes back further. When I see Alicia as black, it feels right and familiar, and I'm not exactly the most knowledgeable FF fan.  I know this comment is pretty vague, but hopefully somebody knows what I'm getting at.  
--Ben Culture (talk) 00:29, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alicia's race. 

message: I'm pretty sure Alicia had a 'regular' romance with Silver Surfer in his series. Lots42 (talk) 04:48, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Romance with SS?  
Talk:Knock Off (film)

message: I'm removing the chunk that says : "Strange directing techniques (e.g. shot in shot used on just one occasion in the film), and an almost dubbed look added to green explosions and "nano" bombs in jeans, make this film - described as an action film - almost a comedy."
I'm not sure what wikipedia's standards are exactly for the wikifilms project stuff, but just from a factual point of view, the insanity in this film is resonably standard for a hongkong martial arts film, the film looks dubbed because it was recorded MOS with the sound added in ADR (many hong kong films don't record sound on set in order to save time), and the writer of this film is the same writer who did everything from Die Hard to Street Fighter, and all his movies have a unique style of comedy to them.
~ I agree with this decision. N. Robert Dow 18:41, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article is currently about the movie, Knock Off: This should be clarified in the title.  It would be a good clarification for the term "knock off" to redirect to Counterfeit consumer goods.  This would give much better flow for readers of Wikipedia.  Rlsheehan (talk) 14:32, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarify subject and redirect
Talk:Senseneb

message: I moved the page because I've never heard of her being mentioned as "Semiseneb", only as "Senseneb", "Seniseneb", "Senisonbe", etc., definitely with an n. See this image, where, I believe, that's a sen glyph in the cartouche over her head.
Anyway, I'm not sure this article can be expanded to be more than a very small stub, but if it has to be a separate article, let's use the correct name. – Alensha talk 18:28, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Astronomy Picture of the Day

message: APOD originated with and was created by Robert Nemiroff and Jerry Bonnell in 1995, as has been documented since the beginning of APOD. John Kressel has recently claimed that the idea for APOD originated with him. His claim has been refuted by both Robert Nemiroff and Jerry Bonnell.
Owlice  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.191.99.27 (talk) 18:51, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Origin of APOD

message: Hello readers
I found this a very very great website.
Just make us feel great about the natural wonders of the universe.
Keep it up APOD guys
Regards
Swarup Bhusari
Nagpur, India
: Agreed 100%.   APOD is the best way to start the day.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.67.104.4 (talk) 12:10, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Remark

message: 09 April 2007 image is the Commons:Picture of the Year/2006.  Self-referencing is not a good thing to do, so I just thought I'd record it here.  Noisy | Talk 09:42, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikipedia Commons features

message: 
--One Salient Oversight 03:17, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Userbox available

message: In the edit text, there is a comment about APOD mirrors, and not adding "them all"  as a link. Why should there be any mirror on there? I think it would be a lot better only having the original APOD and the list of mirrors linked. --yanneman 09:43, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links to mirrors 

message: Reference 4: "Writing and Reading Hypermedia on the Web" >> 404 File not Found  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.243.122.162 (talk) 06:18, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken Links 

message: Is Astronomy Picture of the Day the name of the website, or a description of the image, or both.  Can the two be distinguished?  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:39, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Website title or name of the picture. 
Talk:Chaim Zanvl Abramowitz

message: This article is not neutral at all, and rife with opinion.CharlesMartel 22:58, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality

message: According to this article, he was born in 5658 (=1897/1898). In this intrerview with the Ribnitzer Rebbetzin, she claims that nobody knows for sure, and that according to estimates, he lived between 100 and 106 years. -- -- --  23:14, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  date of birth 

message: The guilty-til-proven party's edit made in 2007 by one 'Reduktor' may or may not be take-em-out-hang'em, but one thing is clear: the 'Nachlas' yeshiva has a USA/IRS-accepted Tax ID#. Waze confirms that the building is as of this moment still a driving destination. The "too close" accusation may or may not be justified, but I'll see if the 2007 edit by Reduktor can still stand. Nuts240 (talk) 15:10, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: correction: IT's REDAktor, not redUktor Nuts240 (talk) 15:41, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: REDAKtor's "remove weasel words" shows he's with the mission. His 1July2007 HatNote need not stay. Nuts240 (talk) 15:56, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Too Close? Nachlas yeshiva has an EIN
Talk:Stony Kill Falls

message: This iamge was redlinked so I removed the link
*Image:stonymap.gif|frame|left|200px|Map
It seems to be in the newpaltz wiki, which may be under GFDL so the image would be accessable to us. RJFJR 12:06, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: That introductory paragraph is nearly incomprehensible to someone not from the area (that would be me). As I currently read that last sentence, am I to understand that Stony Kill Falls is a convenient access point to... Stony Kill Falls? - Antepenultimate (talk) 04:41, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intro paragraph
Talk:Tintin in Tibet (video game)

message: Is it appropriate to include a link to download this game, if the download is hosted on mediafire? Is it public domain? Is this allowed?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.18.240.159 (talk) 03:40, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Appropriate? 

message: This article to me needs more description about the video game to justify it's importance, for all it talks about is a basic summarization of the video game. It seems to also need references to books and other sources and needs in-line citations to these sources. Usb10 (talk) 16:21, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion