Talk:Nothing (film)

message: :Image:NothingFilm.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 00:51, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:NothingFilm.jpg

message: The "production" part of the article reads like a film student's review, and has nothing to do with production.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.221.8.219 (talk) 12:50, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Production 

message: I'm not sure about this part, as the film doesn't seem to suggest that all women are like this, and while there are no strong and positive female characters in it, the downfall of Andrew and David are partially caused (it seems) by their own neuroses and inability to relate to the outside world. For example, were David less naive, he probably wouldn't have been set-up as he was and had Andrew been able to socialize with people in a regular fashion, the girl probably wouldn't have acted as she did either. It also seems a bit silly to include it, as it isn't really relevant to the prevailing philosophy, so I think I will remove it, if there are no objections. 134.117.251.5 (talk) 16:30, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I support the removal, and I actually removed the whole "Production" section since it was original research. Content in the article should be backed by reliable sources. Erik (talk | contribs) 17:07, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Misogyny?

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Nothing (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130515093217/http://www.the-trades.com/article.php?id=3706 to http://www.the-trades.com/article.php?id=3706
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:05, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified