Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Christianity/Christian new religious movements work group

message: This image :Image:Iglesia ni Cristo flag.gif seems to be the official flag of the Church. Does anyone have a higher resolution version of it, or do they actively know if it is subject to fair use restrictions? Any response would be greatly appreciated. John Carter 18:45, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flag image  

message: If you are still part of this project, please add your name here.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiLeon (talk • contribs) 05:46, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Role call 

message: New user box. makes:
 
Enjoy. -- SECisek (talk) 21:30, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: User box

message: It has probably been noticed by most of the editors who frequent this page that there is often a pronounced degree of overlap between the various projects relating to Christianity. Given that overlap, and the rather large amount of content we have related to the subject of Christianity, it has been proposed that the various Christianity projects select a group of coordinators who would help ensure the cooperation of the various projects as well as help manage some project related activities, such as review, assessment, portal management, and the like. Preferably, we would like to consider the possibility of having one party from each of the major Christianity projects included, given the degree of specialization which some of the articles contain. We now are accepting nominations for the coordinators positions at Wikipedia:WikiProject Christianity/Coordinators/Election 1. Any parties interested in helping performing some of the management duties of the various Christianity projects is encouraged to nominate themselves there. Thank you. John Carter (talk) 17:38, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Much to my surprise, the period for the factual elections of the new coordinators has started a bit earlier than I expected. For what it's worth, as the "instigator" of the proposed coordinators, the purpose of having them is not to try to impose any sort of "discipline" on the various projects relating to Christianity, but just to ensure that things like assessment, peer review, portal maintainance, and other similar directly project-related functions get peformed for all the various projects relating to Christianity. If there are any individuals with this project who are already doing such activities for the project, and who want to take on the role more formally, I think nominations are being held open until the end of the elections themselves. And, for the purposes of this election, any member in good standing of any of the Christianity projects can either be nominated or express their votes at Wikipedia:WikiProject Christianity/Coordinators/Election 1. Thank you for your attention. John Carter (talk) 00:27, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinator? 

message: As you may have heard, we at the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial Team recently made some changes to the assessment scale, including the addition of a new level.  The new description is available at WP:ASSESS.
*The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.  
*The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.  
*A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.  
Each WikiProject should already have a new C-Class category at :Category:C-Class_articles.  If your project elects not to use the new level, you can simply delete your WikiProject's C-Class category and clarify any amendments on your project's assessment/discussion pages.  The bot is already finding and listing C-Class articles. 
Please leave a message with us if you have any queries regarding the introduction of the revised scheme.  This scheme should allow the team to start producing offline selections for your project and the wider community within the next year.  Thanks for using the Wikipedia 1.0 scheme! For the 1.0 Editorial Team, §hepBot (Disable) 22:07, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes to the WP:1.0 assessment scheme

message: Would anyone oppose folding this workgroup back into the Christianity project? It has seen no activity for a couple years now. Secisek (talk) 22:00, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Fold

message: Any comments regarding the structure and function of Christianity related material are welcome at Wikipedia:WikiProject Christianity/General Forum#Project organization. Be prepared for some rather lengthy comments, though. There is a lot of material to cover there. John Carter (talk) 17:36, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion regarding project organization 

message: Do we want to move ahead with folding this? What do we need to do? --Secisek (talk) 09:34, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, as one of the members of the work group, I could definitely see it basically be folded back, for no real fault of its own, given the lack of reliable sources in English about the subject. Alternately, it might be possible to expand it to all the Restorationism movements which aren't already included in a more specific group. I guess one thing we could do would be to ask the members of this group what they want to do. I'll drop a message on the pages of all the listed members for their input. John Carter (talk) 15:47, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I suggest to mark the workgroup as historical and fold back into the main project. The main reason why I established the workgroup was because the subject matter requires a different approach than other christianity based subject because of its deviation from mainstream christianity (similar to how the LDS has their own project). But since work rarely happens to the articles, I think more attention could be put on it if it were blended with the parent project.--wL<speak·check> 21:28, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Fold back into parent project

message: I have recently started discussion about possibly changing both the scope of this particularly project and the use of a separate talk page for it here and here. Input from any interested editors is very welcome and encouraged. Thank you. John Carter (talk) 22:07, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed changes to project scope and talk page 

message: Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for information on WP1.0 web tool