lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:John Fashanu

message: This needs more discussion. Clearly there's something going on. Here's a more neutral (less editorial) article . Rd232 talk 23:56, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it should be mentioned, albeit briefly, in his article. The AllAfrica.com here has statements of fact that should be included. Agg56tt (talk) 04:23, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fashanu Report 

message: Why is this article in that category.........? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:27, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Association football controversies" category 

message: --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 14:12, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source material 

message: The Post-football career section starts by saying that "Following retirement from the game through injury, Fashanu became a television presenter. He presented the UK edition of Gladiators alongside Ulrika Jonsson in the 1990s". However the Gladiators article and other sources would suggest that he was co-presenter with Jonsson when the series started in 1992 (which is certainly my own memory). However he did not retire until an injury in 1995, meaning that he was presenting the programme while still playing. Thus it might be better to say something like "Even prior to his retirement from the game through injury, Fashanu was a television presenter. From 1992 he presented the UK edition of Gladiators alongside Ulrika Jonsson." Do other editors think this is a good way forward, or is there a better form of words? Dunarc (talk) 23:47, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Post-football career - possibly misleading statement
Talk:Lillooet language

message: Very interesting. Does it have a script? If so, is that written right to left too? -- 
Sundar \talk \contribs 06:03, July 20, 2005 (UTC)
:We'll have to get a image sample with a transliteration and translation below. It'd also be interesting to show the alphabet. --Oldak Quill 17:51, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Further comment answering first post above - "does it have a script"?  The Duployan shorthand was adapted by Fr. Lejeune of the Oblates for use with the Chinook Jargon by the Diocese of Kamloops.  While it was mostly used for Chinook Jargon, the Diocese's publication Kamloops Wawa (Talk/News from Kamloops) had the occasional prayer or hymn in Secwepemc, Nlaka'pamux, Halkemeylem - and St'at'imcets.  Not that the Duployan had any great ability at conveying complex gutturals, the palatal fricative, or even a decent range of vowels . . . Skookum1 10:03, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Just wondering about adding a mention of the word Ucwalmicwts , which is how St'at'imcets is referred to while you're speaking it; or is there a lexical difference, other than "the language of the nation" vs the "language of the St'at'imc"?Skookum1 08:24, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ucwalmicwts vs. St'at'imcets

message: In light of other article name-changes to reflect most-common-usage, e.g. Thompson language, Okanagan language, Squamish language, Shuswap language, shouldn't this article be "Lillooet language"?  Especially because "St'at'imcets" means "language of the St'at'imc"; ergo the title really says "language of the St'at'imc language"?  Also the /t'/ character is not an English romanization, it's specifically a character in this language signifying [tl], right?  In ethnographic literature the most common usage, especially in other languages, seems to still be "Lillooet language"....Skookum1 (talk) 15:03, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Title is redundant
Talk:Rafe Esquith

message: Is it accurate that his students are from Central America and Korea?  If this is meant to include Mexico, then "Latin American" would be more accurate, since Mexico is part of North America.
Meg999 02:33, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Central American 

message: I recently saw this edit: (cur) (last)  02:41, 13 October 2007 Paul A (Talk | contribs) (3,754 bytes) (correct category tag; a person is not a theatre company) -- I must disagree with the removal of the category. While it may not be literally true that he is a theatre company, the Hobart Shakespeareans are very much associated with him personally, and I think that when searching the category for Shakespearean Companies, it is very much appropriate to include Esquith's article. KConWiki 02:12, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I do not think it is appropriate to include an article about a single person in a category about companies. If it is important to give the Hobart Shakespeareans a place in that category, why not give them their own article? --Paul A 07:21, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

text: I would highly disagree about creating a new Hobart Shakespearean page.  The group isn't notable enough to have its own article,  Oldag07 (talk) 16:01, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Shakespeare Company?

message: I this page would greatly benefit if the book There are No Shortcuts was merged into it.  The "there is no shortcuts page is very short, and honestly, the book is questionably notable when for Wikipedia standards.  Moreover, it is better to have one well written page than 2 short pages, with lots of overlap. Oldag07 (talk) 15:59, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Looking at the history, the page for that article ends up taking up the time of editors doing various chores, but it doesn't help the reader much. Any information there can be added here, so I'd support a merge. -- Noroton (talk) 02:39, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Completed merge.  Late admittedly. Oldag07 (talk) 15:47, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge discussion 

message: The link to Bob Edward's podcast doesn't go to the right page. (footnote 2)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dianaemiko (talk • contribs) 01:45, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad Link
Talk:Dopant

message: Removed the stuff below from the article. Rewrite/expand/improve before putting back... - dcljr (talk) 06:18, 20 July 2005 (UTC)

message: I see little reason for this tobe a separate article from 'doping'عبد المؤمن (talk) 17:16, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge?
Talk:Michael I of Romania

message: As far as I've heard, the former royal family are not part of the  Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen house anymore (except in blood), because the grand-father of King Michael I of Romania was excluded from the house by the head of House Hohenzollern (most likely Wilhelm II) for going to war against Germany and Austro-Hungary during WWI for siding with the Entente. They cut all ties at that point. As far as I know there is no date of coronation, and there is no papers of abdication from his father Carol II (if indeed he is his father), though the abdication paper of Michael I does exist. Therefore it is only Michael I of Romania, and definitively not Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen. Thus he took the private name of Mihai Argesanu after he abdicated. Seems there are serious problems of legitimacy here, but as I don't have all the sources, I'd be very happy if anyone can look into these claims. --Kebman (talk) 17:16, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen Controversy 

message: Under "Line of succession," in the sentence "Nicholas's mother, Princess Helen, received notification of the former king's decision in a personal letter." change "Helen" to "Elena" to correctly identify the mother and to match the wording at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicholas_Medforth-Mills. Grey angel (talk) 15:07, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: DrKay (talk) 17:05, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 26 September 2018 

message: Why is he being called Michael I? He's the ONLY King Michael, so until there were to ever be a second one, he is simply King Michael, not King Michael I. Just like King John of England is not called John I. Queen Elizabeth I was not called "the first" until the current queen became queen and you did have a second Queen Elizabeth.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.202.192.102 (talk) 16:43, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The numeral was in use, as you can see in the abdication act, monastery fresco, stamp and Kremlin plaque all shown in the article. DrKay (talk) 16:49, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 
Talk:Historical persecution of Christians

message: This article has been kept following this VFD debate. Sjakkalle (Check!) 10:18, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  VFD debate link 

message: In both Historical persecution by Christians and Historical persecution by Jews countless grammatical errors have been found. I have cleaned many of them up, but lack the time to address them all. I request that the founders of these articles conduct proofreading on spell-checked versions, wait 10 minutes before posting, and then reread the content of each paragraph to ensure that proper grammar is used. --Lucavix 02:13, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammatical Concerns 

message: The section below is completely unsourced and reads like a personal essay. SlimVirgin (talk) 16:50, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Ridiculous. Depite what many believe, the U.S. has clear seperation of church and state. It is the state who went to Iraq, not the church! Yes, there are Christians in Iraq. There are also atheists. And to say that the U.S. Army is persecuting Muslims is, to be frank, just one person's opinion. Others would disagree. - Ta bu shi da yu 02:11, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Beginning of comtemporary section

message: Arcan, I would prefer it if Christian responses be kept direct, specific to the allegation, and (ideally) sourced.  The reason is that many things listed on the page do not appear to me to be "persecution" from a Christian perspective at all.  Pluralism is not Christianity; and Christian offenses against the tenets of pluralism are not considered sins, except by Christian pluralists.  — Mark (Mkmcconn) ** 14:04, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Historical persecution by Christians#Christian response|Christian response]]

message: The linskl section is terible. Firts off, I had to rmeove two links. The oen ot he Malleus Mallifactgorum served no purpose whatsoever in this article. The pothe rlink was less a study in CHristain persecution and just anothr "Christaisn suck, they killed the oh so great Pagans" site, with obviosu Bias.
At the same time, serious Hisotrical sites DO exist and ARE NOT linked. Ill try this week to find them, and place them in, but can soemone ehelp by adding real links?Thanks.
ZAROVE 02:29, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I understand it if you dyslexic or otherwise disabled, and would not want that to prevent you from editing wikipedia. However, could you please try harder to run your edits through spell check, or have another editor help out with your copy editing before you add it to the main article. Basic spelling mistakes are clearly not encyclopedic, and I believe other editors would take you more seriously if we didn't have to translate and fix all of your edits before making them 'normal'. On another note, I'll see if I can't find any better links.--Andrew c 14:11, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Rmoved Linls
Talk:Dacia Trajana

message: This text merely copies text at Dacia. A redirect would serve the reader better. Later, this can always be spun off, if it threatens to overburden the article Dacia.
Are there any objections? --Wetman 07:17, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Support. --Ghirlandajo 09:40, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Liposarcoma

message: Just a note that for diagnosis of liposarcomas, lipoblasts must be present... In case you want to add this to the article! :) - Natalie O'Halloran, med student.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.215.195.140 (talk) 12:38, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "It is commonly believed that lipoblasts represent the hallmark of any liposarcoma subtype; however, it is important to emphasise that the mere presence of lipoblasts does not make (nor is required for) a diagnosis of liposarcoma" (Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of Soft Tissue and Bone, WHO, 2002) Bernhard138 (talk) 05:55, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Just

message: I have been going through the list of orthopaedic conditions listed as stubs and suggesting this template for Orthopaedic Conditions (see Talk:Orthopedic surgery) 
Name
Definition
Synonyms
Incidence
Pathogenesis
Pathology
Stages
Classification
Natural History/Untreated Prognosis
Clinical Features
Investigation
Non-Operative Treatment
Risks of Non-Operative Treatment
Prognosis following Non-Operative Treatment
Operative Treatment (Note that each operations should have its own wiki entry)
Risks of Operative Treatment
Prognosis Post Operation
Complications
Management
Prevention 
History
--Mylesclough 05:49, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: suggesting template for Orthopaedic Conditions

message: Wikipedia's external links policy and the specific guidelines for medicine-related articles do not permit the inclusion of external links to non-encyclopedic material, particularly including internet chat boards and e-mail discussion groups. Because I realize that most normal editors haven't spent much time with these policies, please let me provide specific information from the guidelines:
* This page, which applies to all articles in the entire encyclopedia, says that links "to social networking sites (such as MySpace or Fan sites), discussion forums/groups (such as Yahoo! Groups), USENET newsgroups or e-mail lists" are to be avoided.
* This page deprecates ""helpful" external links, such as forums, self-help groups and local charities."
* This medical-specific page reinforces the pan-Wiki rules, with a note that "All links must meet Wikipedia's external links guidelines, which in particular exclude discussion forums."
Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and while it may occasionally be useful to patients or their families, it is not an advertising opportunity for support groups.  Please do not re-insert links that do not conform to the standard rules.  Any editor, BTW, is welcome to read all of the rules and perform an "audit" in the remaining links.  Thanks, WhatamIdoing (talk) 21:52, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: External links

message: There is an abandoned draft relating to this topic, if someone were able to review the material. Espresso Addict (talk) 23:27, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Draft:Liposarcoma Genome Project]]
Talk:Homeopathy/Archive 5

message: What points are open that require the NPOV tag (which, if I follow correctly was introduced by Geni), as opposed to the normal editorial differences? Art Carlson 20:58, 2005 Jun 4 (UTC)
:none that I know of. You may want to ask Leifern or Rudi.Geni 21:29, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, I've been off for a while, but you guys seem to have been having a good discussion. For now, the lead part seems a very workable draft as we develop the body of the article. --Rudi 01:54, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV tag 

message: Zicam regularly contians active ingredents and claims to be homeopathic.Geni 11:58, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Homeopathy not completely harmless

message: From: "The practice of mainstream medicine that most closely resembles homeopathy is vaccination."
To: "To some (or many), homeopathy closely resembles the mainstream practice of vaccination."
Reason: For those with a basic understanding of immunology, they are nothing alike. Edwardian 08:14, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds good to me - this section could, as far as I am concerned, be whittled down to one par. of 3-4 sentences. It's not relevant to either side of the debate beyond addressing a question that pops into the mind of many readers.Davidnortman 22:59, 10 July 2005 (UTC)

text: "To some, homeopathy, particularly the use of nosodes, resembles the mainstream practice of vaccination in that vaccines contain a small, closely-related dose of the disease against which they are to protect. Hahnemann himself interpreted the introduction of vaccination by Edward Jenner in 1798 as a confirmation of the law of similars. However, to those familiar with (the modern practices of?) homeopathy and immunology, the two practices are are fundamentally different. A vaccine is usually a bacterium or virus whose capability to produce symptoms has deliberately been weakened while still providing enough information to the immune system By preparing the immune system of a healthy organism to meet a future attack by the pathogen, vaccination hopes to prevent disease in contrast to homeopathy's hope which is to cure it.”
If we’ve sufficient explained what homeopathy is previously in the article, then we shouldn’t need to do it again.  We should  only need to point to how vaccines primarily differ from what was previously mentioned. I feel this summarizes the fundamental difference between the two. Concentration of dosage is certainly one difference (and there are many!), but it is not the fundamental difference nor the primary reason the two are confused. Edwardian 21:49, 11 July 2005 (UTC)

text: This sounds good enough and better than the previous ramble. One sentence to consider adding at the end is: "The one modern medical therapy that does significantly recalls homeopathy's law of similars is allergen immunotherapy where repeated doses of an allergen, sometimes in extremely low doses, are injected into the body in the hope of desensitizing the patient to it."Davidnortman 01:17, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggested changes in the section entitled "Homeopathy and vaccination"
Talk:Huáscar

message: Why has the Huascar page been renamed to a different non-English name twice in the last month? This is a violation of the Wikipedia spelling rules and just plain rude as neither party has made any attempt to improve the page. -- Zenyu 08:17, July 20, 2005 (UTC)
:I moved this page back to Huáscar from Waskhar.  Whoever is renaming these pages, please discuss the move on the Talk page prior to changing the name.  Even though Waskhar may be the correct spelling in Quechua, the name is more commonly spelled Huascar in English texts.  Please talk about it before moving pages! Gsd97jks 02:31, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The second paragraph of this article seems it would fit to an article relating to the civil war between Atahualpa and Huáscar. Throughout various articles mentioning the Inca Empire and the Spanish conquest, the civil war between the two brothers is always mentioned. Maybe we can use this paragraph to serve as an intro for such article? I'm not a particular expert on Inca history, but this is just a suggestion --Dynamax 01:33, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second Paragraph 

message: I came across this during my research: 
Gory Details
I'm not sure whether some of the details should be included in the body of the article, or if the entire piece should be added as an external reference.  What are your thoughts about this? Michael David 22:59, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add this? 

message: I think that's not the correct translation, as Waskhar means Rope and also Chain in Quechua. Huascar's first name, Tupa Cusi Hualpa, means something like "He who brings Royal Joy".
In Fray Martín de Murúa's Chronicle, "Historia General del Perú", at the end of Chapter XXXVII, he explains that "when his son Topa Cusi Hualpa was born, he [Huayna Capac] ordered to make a golden chain of incredible value and weight, that many indians couldn't lift it up from the floor, and in memory of this chain he gave his son the name of Huascaringa, which means Lord and King Rope"
You can also check this link and look for Huáscar. It says "cadena de oro" (Golden Chain) In the explanation TaikunNozomu (talk) 21:35, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: In the dictionary of the Academia Mayor de la Lengua Quechua, his name is given as Inka Waskar.  Waskar is in none of my dictionaries; waskhar is a separate word meaning 'metal chain'.  The Spanish Wikipedia says his name derives from his birthplace, Huascarpata.  Inti Kusi means 'sun joy'; Quechua is head-final so I'm skeptical about 'sun of joy'.  Zompist (talk) 21:45, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Son of Joy
Talk:Julius Evola

message: I'm trying to embed Infobox philosopher onto infobox spy, is this possible?
If not how can I embed them both on to infobox person?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by AverroesII (talk • contribs) 10:50, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trying to get infobox to work? 

message: WorldCat: https://www.worldcat.org/title/protocolli-dei-savi-anziani-di-sion-versione-italiana-con-appendice-e-introduzione/oclc/234090785/editions?referer=di&editionsView=true  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.167.126.25 (talk) 23:34, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: 1937-1938 "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion" by J. Evola in Italian - at least 5 Editions (See WorldCat link below)

message: Many Communist hardliners have become Eastern Orthodox hardliners after the fall of the Communist regimes. So, this is by no means unusual, and there is no reason to suspect that Dugin would be insincere in respect to his own faith. tgeorgescu (talk)  20:30, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hardliners 

message: The portrait had a white line drawn over/around his left eye (stage left, right side of photograph), possibly due to some kind of physical degradation of the photograph. It made me wonder if he had some deformity around that part of his face, until I compared with other photos and looked more closely. It would be good to have a less close-up image than this new one, but not at the cost of that white line over the eye, I don't think. Thiagovscoelho (talk) 17:55, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the old picture was better, as there Evola's face is visible in its totality. In the one you changed it to, the top of his head is out of the frame. I changed it back. Schenkstroop (talk) 17:22, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changed portrait
Talk:World Federation of Democratic Youth

message: Here it says Juventud PSUV from Venezuela has been accepted as a member of WFDY: http://twitter.com/omarnassers/status/49476060148011010 . Any source of verification? --Soman (talk) 14:41, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Juventud PSUV 

message: The article mentions "Federación Universitaria para la Indpendencia" with an obvious misspelling in the final word. Should this actually be "Federación Universitaria Pro Independencia", the Spanish-language name of the Puerto Rico Pro-Independence University Federation? -- John of Reading (talk) 12:56, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Puerto Rico 

message: Most of this article is taken up with a big list of members. At the moment the article is unwieldy, and I think it would make more sense to separate the full list of members into a separate list article. Extua (talk) 16:26, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of members into a list article 

message: I don’t know how to edit Wikipedia articles so someone please add Afghanistan 94.173.80.164 (talk) 16:46, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Democratic Youth Organisation of Afghanistan 