lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Samsung SGH-E250

message: The test mode code is not working in my phone samsung e250  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.85.136.136 (talk) 13:27, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Test mode code 

message: With regard to the Performance section of the Samsung Sgh-E250 article, I would like to point out that the media player can be minimised by following these next steps:
:1. Open Music player in Applications menu.
:2. Use the left soft button to select the Options menu.
:3. Select option 2: Open playlist and press the OK key.
:4. Pick 'All' from the options provided.
:5. An album list will now be presented.
:6. Use the left soft key to select the Options menu again.
:7. Pick option 3 from the options provided and select it by using the left soft key.
:8. Press the left soft key to open the Options menu.
:9. Hold the Cancel button down for a few seconds and you will be transported back to the home screen of your phone, and the music will still be playing.
NOTE: You cannot open other applications while the music player is still active, otherwise the music player will exit automatically.
James890 (talk) 14:20, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Performance
Talk:Lissotestella

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 . It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  --Whpq (talk) 23:36, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Aozora (song)

message: This should be moved to Aoi Sora.  The Japanese wikipedia page clearly has its reading as "Aoi Sora". This page used to say that the correct reading never caught on, but it had no source to verify that. Also that claim doesn't make much sense since, if you listen to the song, he clearly sings it like Aoi Sora as well.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.58.213.116 (talk) 11:44, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to Aoi Sora
Talk:Arms trafficking

message: I think it would be better to have notable arms traffickers list in the page rather than popular cultural references as I think most readers would be interested in the history of the topic rather than cultural references in film and etc Bobisland (talk) 21:05, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The see also section is currently fairly long to begin with (and without any obvious candidates for trimming), and the previous list of arms traffickers section, which was effectively an extension of the see also section, also ended up effectively doubling its size, so I would have to oppose reinstating it. Loafiewa (talk) 13:25, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you think nonfiction is more notable in the page rather than fiction for trimming? If it’s necessary to trim why not trim the fiction and leave the nonfiction? I believe wiki readers would prefer nonfiction over fiction content Bobisland (talk) 13:50, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

text: I don't know, it is at least properly sourced unlike most pop culture sections, but it's a part of the article I have no strong feelings about the state of. Loafiewa (talk) 19:15, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subject on notable arms traffickers
Talk:Stop the Traffik

message: This article is about a charity, not a club. There are many articles about charities on Wikipedia, so i dont see why this one should be deleted. AlmightyClam 13:58, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added a bit to the article to help assert significance. The question here is whether this particular charity meets the notability guidelines for organizations. It would be helpful in establishing that if you could provide more reliable sources, distinct from the charity's own publications and press releases, for verification. While I feel the article no longer meets the speedy criterion, it may still be reviewed for deletion by other processes. If you have questions about this, please let me know at my talk page or ask at Wikipedia's help desk. And if I'm wikilinking to a bunch of policies you already know, please forgive me. :) I prefer to be as complete as possible since I don't know your degree of familiarity with Wikipedia...even though the formatting of your username rather suggests you've been here a while. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:18, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Right. I more or less understand now. Oh, and i haven't actually been here that long, I just found out how to do that pretty quickly. AlmightyClam 17:14, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  More like an advert than an encyclopaedic description::::::  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.140.128.134 (talk) 17:27, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

text: The entire article reads and looks like a cut-and-paste advertising job.  The evidence, some of which I just fixed, is the strange syntax and odd characters used in place of bullets — just the sort of thing one gets when copying from certain Web sites and online magazine articles. — QuicksilverT @ 06:00, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speedy deletion, why?
Talk:Muhammad Qudrat-i-Khuda

message: Here this artcile has cited the reference. The said path may copied from the reffered source. --Librarianpmolib (talk) 13:53, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: What is right?

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://en.banglapedia.org/index.php?title=Qudrat-i-Khuda,_Muhammad. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Worldbruce (talk) 05:10, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:2005 in paleontology

message: The legends for all the dinosaur images on this page say "Albertaceratops" which is obviously wrong for all of them. Can someone sort this out and fix it? - tameeria (talk) 13:57, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:2004 in paleontology

message: The legends for all the dinosaur images on this page say "Albertaceratops" which is obviously wrong for all of them. Can someone sort this out and fix it? - tameeria (talk) 13:58, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is Otogosaurus really a valid taxon? I cannot find a single scientific resource on it (not even the description paper). Ashorocetus (talk) 19:44, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Most probably a nomen nudum. Zhao 2004 was never published (I think) Burmeister (talk) 00:19, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I think so too. That's what it says on the List of dinosaur genera page. I just fixed it here.Ashorocetus (talk) 15:05, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Otogosaurus
Talk:2003 in paleontology

message: The legends for all the newly named dinosaur images on this page say "Albertaceratops" which is obviously wrong for all of them. Can someone sort this out and fix it? - tameeria (talk) 13:59, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:2006 in paleontology

message: The legends for all the dinosaur images on this page say "Cryolophosaurus" which is obviously wrong for all of them. Can someone sort this out and fix it? - tameeria (talk) 14:01, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Now You're Gone (Basshunter song)

message: Is it basshunter who does the singing in the english version? It doesnt sound like him...Slipzen (talk) 14:05, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it isn't. I've seen a 'DJ Alex' floating around in (mostly) unofficial sources. It is DEFINITELY not Jonas (Basshunter) himself.  VxJasonxV (talk) 16:30, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I thought it was by DJ Mental Theo's Bazzheadz? (talk) 20:44, 07 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The single on its release on Hard2Beat Records on 7 January 2008 was credited to Basshunter.  The producer is Jonas Altberg (otherwise known as Basshunter)though the vocals are by Sebastian Westwood.  As is often the case with dance singles, poor old Sebastian doesn't even get a credit on the record sleeve!  DJ Alex is responsible for the remix at track 3 on the original release (DJ Alex Extended Mix).  This is the same song as Boten Anna by the same artist.  It may have been remixed, and the meaning of the lyrics may have been changed in translation (not an unusual thing when songs are translated from one language to another), but it remains the same song, with the same writer, and the articles should therefore be merged.
Skinsmoke (talk) 00:59, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

text: Techno songs are mostly known for their nonsensical/lack of lyrics and hardcore bass tracks. Basshunter is a typical example of a techno group. Techno lyrics are never meant to be as good as other genres, since Techno is more about repetition and the party atmosphere. AlexFili (talk) 12:16, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Let us not forget that this is not originally an english-language song, so squeezing a completely different language in is sometimes hard to pull off rhythmically. VxJasonxV (talk) 08:55, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Looks it was released earlier than 29 December 2007. Single has been charted on Irish chart end dating on 6 December 2007 (#43). Eurohunter (talk) 19:07, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release date 

message: Is this official website? Eurohunter (talk) 23:05, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Top 30 Dance Club Play (Brazil)
Talk:List of forms of word play

message: Should we include links to different types of word games? The links involved are jumble, rebus, and oronym. Some word games do resemble certain types of word play, but not all do and there are tons of word games, which already has a list of its own. Where should we draw the line on what to add and what not to add here? I'm of the opinion that this list should not contain links to word games. It's in the "see also" section already.
Keith Galveston (talk) 14:19, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed oronym because it's not an independent article yet and it's included in homophone. Keith Galveston (talk) 14:26, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Word puzzles and word games 

message: What would one call an anagramic acronym that forms a word that describes the phrase from which the anagramic acronym originates?
For example:
Take the phrase "New Novel Idea Toward (an) Enterprising Venture".  The acronym is NNITEV, which is anagramically rearranged as "INVENT".  I know ... kinda lame, but I'm making this up as I go so, so leeway, please?  This is done occasionally for marketing purposes, or when inventing a name for a new business (when limited by available .com domains).  
I was going to do this for one, "KUDOSi", from which I derived the following as the description of this word, KUDOSi, as "Stand in Doing Kindness Unto Others" (SiDKUO) ... the idea being that you get KUDOSi's (kudos) for "Standing-in, Doing Kindness Unto Others (SiDKUO).  Anyway, it seems a fairly common practice (and is fairly easy to do ... unlike inventing pure anagrams or pure acronyms that spell real words) ... but I'm not aware that the practice is represented by any one term.  "Anagramic acronym" is probably the closest thing to the term I'm looking for, but a websearch for that term brings up nothing. Davea0511 (talk) 15:37, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anagramic Acronyms? 

message: There is a kind of word play which I only know by the expression "irregular verbs". That expression is not to be taken literally. An example is: "I am a gourmet. You are a gourmand. He has both feet in the trough." Is this worthy of mention in Wikipedia?   TomS TDotO (talk) 14:40, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Irregular verbs"
Talk:James Vincent (director)

message: In a 1931 newspaper, the James Vincent lover of J. Warren Kerrigan is described as Kerrigan's secretary , in 1931 the James Vincent of this article was in Greece directing his last movie, Such Is Life (1931) . Elisa.rolle (talk) 22:06, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[James Vincent]] vs [[James Carroll Vincent]]
Talk:Richard Wüerst

message: The third symphony is opus 36 in C minor, published in 1862; an opus 54 in D minor followed later. Were they published out of chronological order, or were there more than three? (Source: Walter Frisch, Brahms: The Four Symphonies. New Haven: Yale University Press (2003): 7 - 10. . Table 1-1, "A chronological listing of symphonies by contemporary composers published in the Austro-German sphere in the period between Schumann's Third and Brahms's First." Wüerst's D minor is listed under 1869 (its date of publication, as Frisch explains in a note on page 10). Schissel | Sound the Note! 14:25, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Three symphonies?
Talk:Nilesat

message: This article should be updated to reflect Nilesat 201's launch. - Propeng   Talk  16:25, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nilesat 201 
Talk:Treaty battleship

message: Please fix these. Thanks. Djmaschek (talk) 03:58, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: , Thanks! It's sometimes hard to find such mistakes as you pointed out without new eyes on the article. Eddie891  Talk Work  12:52, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

text: *  Hey Eddie I was just reading this article and my eyes spotted something. This sentence  in the background section hasn't a citation. Could you be so kindly to add a citation in the sentence? Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 15:13, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

text: *:, sure, added! as an aside, do you think I could nominate this article for ga with a bit of improvement? It's a summary article, so I don't feel it needs to be super in depth. Eddie891  Talk Work  16:46, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: *  Well I personally don't see any major problem. Do you personally have the books of the article? If it is a yes then sure you can nominate it. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 17:24, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: *:, I have access to them through Project MUSE Eddie891  Talk Work  17:26, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: *  Great! Go ahead try to make it a GA-class mate. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 17:38, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: B class review

message: Treaty_battleship#List_of_ships_considered_treaty_battleships is completely unsourced,  or  anyone else, could you add sourcing or remove the list? See WP:V for sourcing guidelines. Eddie891  Talk Work  16:38, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced list
Talk:Demographics of Washington, D.C.

message: This article would benefit greatly from the addition of a graphic image that would show the recent dynamics of population change in Washington DC.  The initial graphic in the Demographics of New York City shows one type of example, and probably the type that is needed first.  However, other graphics that show demographic distribution, or historical demographic distribution would be very useful as well, such as those seen in Demographics of Philadelphia. N2e (talk) 15:13, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Demographic map needed

message: http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/11000.html
White alone, percent,                   2012 (a)	42.9%	77.9%
Black or African American alone, , 2012 (a)	50.1%	13.1%
American Indian and Alaska Native, 2012 (a)	0.6%	1.2%
Asian alone, percen                         2012 (a)	3.8%	5.1%
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacificic  2012 (a)	0.2%	0.2%
Two or More Races, percent defini            	2.5%	2.4%
Hispanic or Latino, percent definition and 	9.9%	16.9%
White alone, not Hispanic or Latino,          	35.5%	63.0%
The article also refers to the city as being no longer majority black, while brookings is a good source,
the US Census bureau is generally definitive.  
It may be better to redraft teh article to state "DC may have dropped from majority african-american status
sometime between 2011 and the present time.  Noted Demographer X at Brookings proposed the change had
occurred in 2011, while a US Census department study showed a continuing decline in 2012, that event had not
occurred but was expected to occur in 2013"
--Patbahn (talk) 15:28, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  does this article need updating 

message: The line in the intro — "The city was a majority-black city from the late 1950s through 2011" — contradicts the data, which shows the city as having more white people than black people in 1960. - Sdkb (talk) 00:29, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction in data
Talk:D'Albertis Castle

message: This article is now linked to from Genoa and Gothic Revival. I'm going to check and add some more. About how many constitutes non-orphaned status? --Phyesalis (talk) 15:01, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: 6-10 would make it non-orphan status. - Milk's Favorite Cookie 16:31, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

text: Great! Thanks! --Phyesalis (talk) 17:03, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure - no problem! - Milk's Favorite Cookie 20:00, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Added link in Luigi Maria d'Albertis. --Phyesalis (talk) 01:22, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Orphan status
Talk:The Book of Animal Ignorance

message: I get quite bemused by which articles wind up in which classes, but surely this is higher than "Start", since there's only so much information one could want or need that can be discovered without actually reading the book..?! ntnon (talk) 19:21, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I suppose it can be boosted up to a "B", although the article really needs an infobox (see the one used in The Book of General Ignorance article). ISD (talk) 19:34, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Class ratings
Talk:Avolution

message: Dear JASpencer,
I'm just wanting to open a dialog regarding your suggested deletion of the avolution page.  For the record, I am independent of avolution and a recent member to WP (so apologies for getting things wrong if I have done protocol-wise).  My organisation has recently purchased ABACUS, however, I can't disclose their name as my comments are my opinion etc.  I trust you understand.  Anyway, some background ... my organisation recently chose ABACUS from various other TOGAF certified tools.  As part of our evaluation process I looked at WP and saw various other TOGAF certified tools were present however ABACUS wasn't.  Utlimately, that was my motivation for updating the TOGAF page and creating the avolution page.  Now, in response to your notability query, ABACUS has been reviewed very favourably by Forrester and AMR research and large organisations like Capita, Serco, AXA and BT are using it along with (according to avolution themselves) 'hundreds or users in over 20 countries'.  Which brings me to note that I did check the facts with avolution before posting the page and used some information provided by them during the evaluation process.  Not surpringly they have been supportive in this effort.  So I suggest we just leave the page there for a while and see who else contributes to it and helps to establish their notability.  ABACUS really is a great tool, that just keeps getting more and more impressive the more I use it.  Petersleep (talk) 17:58, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: avolution

message: Second - from morlecools to organized forms with much theyares.. 
After - forests with anymales and oceanes with anymals - too .. 
More after - they with "brain" haveing knoledges for looking inter futures. 
This 1000-year - by "Our Galaxy". 
Only all. I think so .. ) 176.59.210.177 (talk) 09:34, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "First circle" - was from atoms to morlecools ..  
Talk:Something Borrowed (Torchwood)

message: When Jack was going through the pictures of himself, there was one of his wedding day. Was that Estelle, or was it Gwyneth, or was it somebody else altogether? My eyes sort of couldn't tell.~ZytheTalk to me! 22:53, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone else, someone who hasn't been on the show before Starhunterfan (talk) 00:29, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

text: Not really... there's no story conection.  — Edokter • Talk •  23:23, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revelation at the end 

message: Who played the Lady in Black (Nostrovite)? shouldn't that be added to the  cast list? AlbertHall (talk) 14:38, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lady in Black 

message: Is this corect? (I have not seen this episode but this looks like creatove vandalism)
Her presence is detected by Tosh and Banana.
:Nope... his name is really Banana. -- 66.167.244.240 (talk) 19:23, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Banana? 
Talk:Adrift (Torchwood)

message: Does this follow on neatly from the June date given in To the Last Man?  Can it help us decide when "seven months" ago was? User: Stripey.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.102.93.19 (talk) 09:59, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Monday 27th

message: The asylum/home where Jonah and the others are kept looks like a real institution. Unless it was a very well-made set, I think it was a genuine location, does anyone here know where it was recorded? If so, please put it on the article. DavidFarmbrough (talk) 20:12, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location 

message: Perhaps its because of the german dub, but it seems to me that Nikki blames Gwen for showing her, ruining her positive memories of her son. If so, I think it's noteworthy, as it's a rather cruel and unjust reaction of her.--Cyberman TM (talk) 18:52, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Nikki blaming Gwen?
Talk:Hans Thomsen

message: Is he still alive? I see no death date on the page
---There is a date now posted (June 14, '09). My question is, is the background information on Hans Thomsen correct? Just read in elmundo.es that Hans Thomsen was the Nazi regime chief in Spain from 1939-1945. Two albums with over 400 pictures belonging to Thomsen have been found at the home of a 90 year old man who was asked to keep them when Thomsen left Spain after the end of WWII. Or are there two Hans Thomsens?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.86.65.70 (talk) 07:15, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this guy still alive? 
Talk:Nagin

message: Maebela 41.116.58.96 (talk) 08:25, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  English  