Talk:Rugrats in Paris: The Movie

message: :Image:Rugrats-in-Paris-Poster-C10095297.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:52, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Rugrats-in-Paris-Poster-C10095297.jpg

message: IP user recently submitted edits: here, which largely contained detail unnecessary to our understanding of the film, including excessive wikilinks. I reverted most of the changes, but kept the spelling of Chas (Chaz --> Chas) as it seemed correct.  Edit summary read: "(See WP:OVERLINK Common words/phrases that do not improve understanding of Rugrats in Paris should not be linked. Keeping "Chas" as that appears in closing credits.)"  The article also contains excessive detail unnecessary to understanding what the movie is about.
IP user restored most of the changes.  Here's more detail about why I reverted the edits a second time. 
* "The film starts with a parody of the 1972 drama film The Godfather,
: Parody is a common word.  We don't need a history lesson about film in 1972.  Drama film (or dramatic film) is a common concept.
* "at the wedding reception of Lou Pickles and his new wife, Lulu.
: A wedding reception is a fairly standard concept.  Learning more about wedding receptions doesn't necessarily improve our understanding of Rugrats.
* "Meanwhile, Tommy Pickles' father, Stu, is summoned to EuroReptarland, a Japanese theme park in Paris, France,"
: "Euro" doesn't mean Disneyland Paris, so a wikilink to that is unnecessary. A wikilink for "reptar" could be appropriate. Don't need a wikilink for Japan, as it is a major geographical area (See WP:OVERLINK) and doesn't improve our understanding of Rugrats in Paris.  Amusement park is a fairly common concept.  A wikilink for Paris is warranted as it is the subject of the movie.
* Bible doesn't need a wikilink as it is not central to our understanding of the plot.
* It's not necessary to add a parenthetical that explains that children are the target market for amusement parks. This is supposed to be a summary of a movie, not an economics lesson. 
* We don't use contractions (They are --> They're) in encyclopedic prose.
There are other grammatical issues as well, but this should suffice as an explanation for my reversion.  Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:27, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reversion of edits by 172.5.2.207 

message: In this edit I removed the alt titles from this article. There were 181,000 Google hits for "Rugrats in Paris: The Movie" compared to a scant 18,000 for "Rugrats II" and 9,500 for "The Rugrats Movie 2". Not significant enough to include these alts; represents undue weight to a minority usage. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:46, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed alt titles 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Rugrats in Paris: The Movie. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110708085458/http://www.bostonphoenix.com/archives/2000/documents/00524288.htm to http://www.bostonphoenix.com/archives/2000/documents/00524288.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:03, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified