lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Anthrosexuality

message: Is this article really necessary? It seems like it could be merged in with pansexuality. That article says, "Pansexuality is sometimes described as the capacity to love a person romantically irrespective of gender. Some pansexuals also assert that gender and sex are meaningless to them."
Inkburrow 13:03, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: (To the oppose) Yeah, and heterosexuals are attracted to who they're attracted to, and bisexuals, and homosexuals, etc. This seems like a run-around sentence. There is no difference. I think the article should be deleted all-togerther. Disinclination 06:50, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible Merge

message: The redirect to pomosexual will give a greater meaning and a more true def.--Cooljuno411 (talk) 23:07, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move redirect from [[Polysexual]] to [[Pomosexual]] 

message: If I may, being someone that identifies as anthrosexual and having a friend who identifies as pansexual...
They are very similar in the way that both pan- and anthrosexual individuals are open to relationships with people outside of your archetypal gender binaries (i.e. transgender, intersex, cross-dressers, etc.); however, a pansexual person would be open to those relationships because they are impervious to gender identity. Basically, they don't even notice gender identity in terms of attraction. On the other hand, an anthrosexual person does notice gender identity and is very much physically attracted to people outside of the gender binary based on those identities.
The quick and dirty of it: 
My pansexual friend doesn't really care if someone is male, female, transgender, intersex... what have you. What she finds attractive has nothing to do with gender identity.
On the other hand, I do care if someone is male, female, transgender, intersex... what have you. I care a lot because I am very much attracted to it. All of it.
It's a subtle difference, but it's a difference, and I find it somewhat offensive that anthrosexual and pansexual were pretty cavalierly tossed into an article about 'pomosexuality' because that seems to be a cutesy term used to describe people who just choose not to identify with a specific orientation, while anthro- and pansexuality are orientations in their own right. 76.205.7.108 (talk) 06:32, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The difference between pan- and anthro-
Talk:Edward S. Morse

message: that he died in 1925 shouldn't that photo of him have a date other than 1930? Or at least say "published in 1930?"
Flizzjkzaop (talk) 15:14, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Considering 

message: The Phillips Library has digitized a significant amount of our manuscript material related to Morse, including original photographs and correspondence, as well as modern transcripts of his original diaries that he'd later adapted into Japan Day By Day. That site is here: https://pem.quartexcollections.com/collections/edward-s.-morse I'd propose that the collection be added as an external link. - As I'm an employee of the Library, by Wikipedia rules, someone else would need to add that. DigitizingArchives (talk) 15:23, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding a link to a digital collection
Talk:Drew and Mike

message: I don't think this page should be deleted, I just have never posted to Wikipedia before and have not figured everything out yet.
*Strong Oppose Delete - 16 years in a major market... This show has a lot of history and absolutely should not be deleted.   Adamgs82 (talk) 03:09, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Article deletion discussion

message: Why are these people notable? Where are the reliable sources about any of the information in this article? Why does this not conform to our policies on neutral point of view? Seriously... this needs immediate attention. Captainktainer * Talk 12:09, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Any number of concerns 

message: I looked in the VA Tech Media Guide, and it lists Andy Aldrich as a captain in the 1980 and 1981 season.  However, he is NOWHERE to be found as far as individual records go, as stated in this article.....
So, put a fact template on it and maybe even move it into a discussion section here. -- Sy / (talk) 13:02, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Baseball Records? 

message: I'm willing to go along with closure of the AFD despite the fact that the discussion does not meet WP:SNOW (which is not a policy BTW).  Now, let's take all that energy that was put into opposing deletion of this article into improving it, especially the references.--Rtphokie (talk) 11:56, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It was a steep uphill battle, but we've managed to transform the miracle into reality.  Great work everyone!  Coccyx Bloccyx (talk) 21:34, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  AFD results
Talk:Jurassic National Monument

message: I removed the sentence on bouldering because it needed to be rewritten and it should cite some kind of source.  I will see if I can track down a reference to bouldering in the area, but if anybody comes up with one before I get back to it, feel free to add it back.
If it gets added back into the article, it may be better to split it off into a separate Recreation section or some other section that is separate from the paleo.
Justin 13:08, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recreation 

message: A link to a Goolge Maps location would be helpful.
As regards the "Visiting" section; please add the following to the end of the 2nd paragraph:
"Schedule goes back to weekends only from Labor Day until the end of October.  Entrance fee of $5 per adult with anyone under 16 free."
204.124.92.254 (talk) 15:54, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map 

message: I recently (on Saturday 17th of May 2014) visited this dinosaur quarry and spoke with a volunteer at the visitor center. Based on our conversations, I am making the following comment about this Wikipedia article.
The Wikipedia article, which is very well written, states as fact that "Dinosaurs became entrapped in the cohesive and adhesive mud as they drank and hunted near the floodpond". This has not been established as a fact, in my opinion. Further, I read in the "official" descriptions in the visitor center at the quarry that scientists do not accept this hypothesis anymore. Reasoning given includes the idea that the deepest part of the mud-clay layer in which the fossils lie is about three feet -- less than a meter; it seems highly unlikely that animals as powerful as juvenile Allosauruses, not to mention sauropods (Brachiosaurus), would be trapped in a three-foot layer of clay. 
The "wall literature" at the visitor center, along with discussion with the apparently highly knowledgeable amateur expert volunteer mentioned above, make clear that scientists studying this site are at an impasse in explaining the dense concentration of fossil bones. But they have tentatively rejected the hypothesis of a mud-clay pond trap.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cogreg (talk • contribs) 02:06, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, you're right, I fixed this part. Kintaro (talk) 08:07, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hypothesis about cause of high concentration of dinosaur fossils may need revision
Talk:Andrés de Urdaneta

message: I have changed the portion wich said "Spain don't discovered most of any islands of the Pacific". This is false, at the moment that they discovered many islands before and many after Urdaneta: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%81lvaro_de_Menda%C3%B1a_de_Neira  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bentaguayre (talk • contribs) 16:45, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: We need a better account of Urdaneta's route. The question is currently split between this article, Manila Galleon and Volta do Mar. The trick of going north to catch the Westerlies is trivial, but there must be some problem in the Pacific. It might be connected to the time of the year or the monsoon, but I cannot find a good source. Benjamin Trovato (talk) 03:36, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  What did he really discover? 
Talk:Bobby Gonzalez

message: OK, there has been a BLP thread opened by a party who appears to represent (or acting on behalf of) the subject's interests. As there has been no discussion, and I think I can glean the jist of the complaint (though no specifics were mentioned) I'd like to start point by point:
* The incident at the mall. There was no conviction. It is unclear whether Gonzalez made a deal, and why. Should it be included? Why or why not? And to what extent? Opinions please:  David Able 00:43, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I support your above comments and the changes to the article. Hopefully this discussion will serve as a base for consensus if the issue arises again.  David Able 16:42, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The policies spelled out at Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons apply to material posted by editors in talk space as well as in article space. User:Lindag3333 comes here asking for protection under this policy, but then makes serious, unsourced charges against Pat Hobbs and Pete Thamel. This is inappropriate, and I would suggest that User:Lindag3333 revise the above comments to extend the same rights to other living persons that are being claimed for the subject. --Arxiloxos (talk) 01:52, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  BLP Issues 

message: I think that generally the entire article needs to be reworded, especially the part on Seton hall. Over all most of the article sounds like a news paper article instead of a Wikipedia article. @ d \/\/ | | |Talk  00:53, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wording Issues 
Talk:Noel Streatfeild

message: Hiya isn't N.S the best author ever?
yes  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.10.57.34 (talk) 18:27, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: one of the best:) Coolabahapple (talk) 02:20, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tyrone Senior Football Championship

message: I only could find the Tyrone champions up to 1999, could someone please write the winners below? Frainc 14:29 11 September 2006
2000=Errigal Ciarán
2001=Carrickmore
2002=Errigal Ciarán
2003=Killyclogher
2004=Carrickmore
2005=Carrickmore
There is a list of winners and Runner's Up on the Tyrone County Board website, I'll see that I can make a full list up with that. Lawhec 18:22, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Champions 

message: There are three possible amendments that can be made to the top winners table.
1. Coalisland and Coalisland Na Fianna are the same club and have been since 1904. Records of both should be combined.
2. Fintona Pearses and Fintona Davitts cover an almost identical catchment area and only co-existed for less than a year, most records instead show Fintona with two championships rather than two seperate clubs, suggest showing two championships for "Fintona".
3. Same for the two Strabane clubs. Up until the late 1980's the on-off nature of the GAA in the town meant clubs came and went. The current club, Strabane Sigersons, was only founded in 1986. Again possibly amend the table to show two championships to "Strabane".
If there is no dispute on this I'll make the amendments in the next few days. Lawhec 18:22, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Top Winners
Talk:Chitty Chitty Bang Bang (car)

message: There are a number of replica cars out there, including the one depicted in the photo on this page as of this writing.Unsinkablerob (talk) 15:20, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

message: Is this taken from the old slang word for "knowledge" or "information"?, eg. "I've got the latest gen" / "The gen on this is ... " Danceswithzerglings (talk) 17:14, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: "Gen"

message: Part of the actual article sounds like it's debating itself. The last paragraph under the "Replica Cars" section reads, in part:
> "Actually the Garofalo replica lacks in several specific and iconic features... Tony's [car] is a fantastic replica and work of art, but don't claim it to be an exacting detail to the original when significant features are easily recognized as not accurate."
I think the entire last paragraph should be removed. If whoever wrote that section wants to debate, isn't that what the this talk section is for?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saundecp (talk • contribs) 19:13, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Debate
Talk:Harvard Model Congress

message: Neutrality of this article should come into question (see San Fransisco portion).
This whole article reads like an ad.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.125.187.132 (talk) 02:07, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
Talk:List of Imran Series characters

message: I have deleted the addition of the character 'Tiger' in this list, because this character was not created by Ibn-e-Safi and was not the part of the original series. Nastaliq 13:43, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The list is not strictly Ibn-e-Safi now; Mazhar Kaleem's characters have been added. Nastaliq 05:21, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

message: A request for comments has been started that could affect the inclusion 
or exclusion of episode and character, as well as other fiction articles. Please 
visit the discussion at 
Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(fiction)#Final_adoption_as_a_guideline. Ikip (talk) 11:18, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for comment on articles for individual television episodes and characters

message: Merge this page to Imran series characters as there is nothing significant or new information is provided here. --StarryEyed (talk) 12:16, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge the page
Talk:Athens Declaration of the European Left

message: The original text shouldn't be in Wikipedia, but in Wikisource. I will transfer it right away there, under the title "Athens Declaration of the European Left". And I will make a link from here to it. The introduction meets the policy standards of Wikipedia and it should stay. --Dead3y3 Talk page 13:45, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Extension problem

message: I think that the distinction between K being a subgroup of G or only being isomorphic to one is not important, because there is a specific isomorphism between them.  This language doesn't really generalize anything, it just makes it a bit more confusing. Gregory Muller 13:58, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

message: I'm not sure there are enough interesting things to say about group extensions other than their classification to merit its own entry. Gregory Muller 13:58, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, there are entire articles on group cohomology and the ext functor, so it would seem there's a lot to be said ... linas 20:33, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with Group Extension

message: The claim that Ext^1(H,K) classifies central extensions of H by K is wrong.  Ext^1 classifies only abelian extensions.  Central extensions are classified by group cohomology, namely H^2(H,K), which is a gadget that makes sense after we've specified an action of H on K.  So, someone should fix this.   It may have to be me.  John Baez 18:32, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: We'd prefer it was you ... linas 20:35, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the section. Ext^1(H,K/[K,K]) is zero if K is perfect, so the formula is wrong, but if K is non-abelian then a central extension of K is never abelian, so it does not classify abelian extensions either. JackSchmidt (talk) 15:07, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Mistake
Talk:Henry Parkes

message: hi, i deleted a damaged paragraph in "Third Parliament": can someone please find the rest of it and restore it? thx Coughinink 08:15, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  damaged paragraph 

message: The tone of language, particularly in the lead, reads like a eulogy. Descriptions of his "rugged facial features", "leonine hair", and "indomitable character" do not belong here, and should be removed, either to a well-sourced "reputation" section, or from the article entirely. I♦A 07:23, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tone 

message: Most of the content here has been copied from this page in Project Gutenberg here and it needs editing to fit with Wikipedia's tone. I would also argue that it's far too detailed - I removed one section that described the diet he ate while working in one of his jobs ("This ration consisted mainly of rice, flour and sugar, for the meat was sometimes unfit to eat"). Remember, a reader can very easily access this source if they want to find out more. I've already rewritten some of the paragraphs, but I would argue that even that information could be summarised even further. I attempted to rewrite the introduction to make it sound like an encyclopedia but another user reverted the edit without explanation.
I notice that this talk page isn't very active. Someone complained about the tone nearly two and a half years and no-one responded. If no-one replies to this within the next few days, I'll press ahead with further editing. 194.34.10.1 (talk) 10:32, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: O 125.209.160.4 (talk) 03:48, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Tone

message: Henry  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.208.93.116 (talk) 07:19, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: ???Underline 122.104.141.12 (talk) 05:33, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Henry Park by mindulie 

message: He was a Radical in his times. But he was knighted. A tradie with little formal ed. A British imperialist? A proto-Laborite? What?--Jack Upland (talk) 18:50, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  His Politics? 

message: The page has been edited to claim Parkes nationality was Australian. I have reverted them as no reliable source has been cited for an Australian nationality prior to 1901. --Find bruce (talk) 01:56, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Nationality

message: 1815 27th may and he died on 1896 April 27th 125.209.160.4 (talk) 03:50, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Born 

message: He had 16 kids 125.209.160.4 (talk) 03:52, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kids
Talk:Be-Music Source

message: Pop'n Music Script is used by not Bemani games, but their simulators; and it is a derivative of Be-music Script (BMS). File formats used by Bemani games are not in public as I know. See . --Tokigun 14:10, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Glass Walkers

message: :Sorry, but this article is about a fictional tribe of werewolfs. No connection to a project on dogs. Heinrich k 21:57, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

message: Never heard of a Glass Walker camp/faction giving its name to the tribe. Instead, it seems to me that from the moment the Iron Riders name was ditched, no faction could claim leadership on the others, so a new name for forged, and the situation remains in that way to this day: no dominant camp, and no Glass Walkers camp. --79.4.213.65 (talk) 12:53, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Glass Walker faction?
Talk:Calcium lactate

message: This article maintains that calcium lactate is used as a "baking powder".  It seems to me that it would be more accurate to say that it's used in baking powder.
Baking powder is usually a combination of sodium bicarbonate and an acidic agent (with the exception of the use of ammonium bicarbonate in some dry cookies and crackers).  When the acidic agent is sodium acid pyrophosphate, calcium lactate can be used as a source of calcium in order to delay leavening (Source: Baking Science and Technology, E.J. Pyler, Sosland Publishing, 1988, page 933).
As far as I know you can't use calcium lactate alone to leaven baked goods.  If I'm missing something here, call me on it.  I worked in the baking industry for years, but I'm not a chemist and there's big gaps in my knowledge when you get down to specifics about the chemistry involved.  Ormewood (talk) 06:44, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Used as a baking powder? 

message: According to the structural formula the configuration of both stereocenters is (S). In other words this is a derivative of L-lactic acid. However, neither the IUPAC name nor the text give precise information regarding the configuration of both stereocenters. Best regards, --Jü (talk) 19:06, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stereochemistry ?
Talk:Concelho

message: Sorry for the lack of a better heading, but this is what I think about the move from Municipalities of Portugal to Concelho: Wow, that was BOLD! I totally disagree with this move because:
# Look at :Category:Municipalities: there is not one single country where its municipalities are described under the native language term; 
# In fact, look again at :Category:Municipalities: all articles follow the title convention of "Municipalities of (country)", so as to standardize the category;
# A third, deeper look at :Category:Municipalities: not a single of those article titles is a redirect to another title, so all the articles titled "Municipalities of (country)" are genuine
# Let's now turn to :WP:Naming conventions: "Generally, article naming should give priority to what the majority of English speakers would most easily recognize, with a reasonable minimum of ambiguity, while at the same time making linking to those articles easy and second nature."
# Want more? "Names of Wikipedia articles should be optimized for readers over editors; and for a general audience over specialists."
# Still more: "Name your pages in English and place the native transliteration on the first line of the article unless the native form is more commonly used in English than the English form."
# If "Concelho" prevails over "Municipalities of Portugal", will the companion article also be moved to "List of Concelhos of Portugal"?
Enough with the numbers. I believe that "Municipality" is a common English word that correctly carries the meaning of "Concelho". I believe that you missed all the hints from :Category:Municipalities because Municipalities of Portugal wasn't itself included in the category. As for the policies' oversight, yes, they're too many sometimes. 
In conclusion, I totally support a redirect from "Concelho" to "Municipalities of Portugal", but not the other way round. Oh, and by the way, the same should be said of Freguesia and Parishes of Portugal (which doesn't exist as of my writing). If someone seconds me, we can go for a straw poll to move the article back to whence it came. --maf 14:27, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm totally with you. It's plain stupid to use Concelho, since it is only used colloquially. Municipality (município) is the official form. You have the Câmara Municipal, not the Câmara Concelhia. Joaopais 01:08, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh my. The move has been reverted by its author, so now we're left here with a dubious disambiguation page that looks more like a dictionary entry, which WP asks specifically not to be. Still, I'm going to first sort out the mess at the article on the Municipalities of Macau before coming back to this article. --maf 10:41, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Wow, that was '''BOLD'''!
Talk:Margaret of Sweden, Queen of Norway

message: The woman was not named Margaret of Sweden in any original sources. She was not reigning queen of Sweden. Her actual name was Margrét Eiríksdóttir, anglicized Margaret Ericsdaughter, or Eriksdotter. So why is the article under this name? Is there a strange wikipedia naming-convention in play here, and in that case, what is it? The same problem also applies for Kristina of Norway and Margaret of Scotland and probably others. --Barend 14:28, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a convention, which is well short of being a policy, which says to do this at Wikipedia:Naming conventions (names and titles). It is badly written and allows exceptions. The actually policy says to use real names. In a dispute, we determine what the consensus view is, if need be by following the Wikipedia:Requested moves process. Given that the article was written as Margareta Eriksdotter, and was moved without any attempt to determine whether there was support for doing so, there's no need for any consensus to move it back. Anyone can move it, just so long as they fix any broken redirects. Angus McLellan  (Talk) 14:48, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Where does this article title come from?