lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Category talk:College radio stations

message: This umbrella category should probably be renamed, as "college radio" is a US-specific term not used in any other country. It's legitimate for the US-specific subcategory to use that term, but the general umbrella category should be named with a more neutral, internationally suitable default term. Even the head article is titled campus radio rather than college radio; the latter term just redirects to the first one.
However, the CFR process requires that the new name be proposed at the time of the nomination, so I'm initiating a discussion here to solicit ideas as to what the new name should be. Bearcat 19:37, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "Student radio" would probably be best - that way the category can also include articles on high school radio and the major awards. Timrollpickering 13:40, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: For the record, I've now gone ahead and done this; it was also consistent with the naming of other student media categories (i.e. :Category:Student newspapers, :Category:Student television stations, etc.) Bearcat 08:48, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Naming
Talk:The Man in the Moon (1991 film)

message: There's another page for this film: The Man in the Moon (film). Someone should join the two articles together. 90.129.1.64 17:49, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. I added mergeto- and mergefrom-templates on the respective pages. --Bensin 20:40, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 14:44, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The Man in the Moon →  – Per WP:NOPRIMARY, I believe this should be a redirect to Man in the Moon (disambiguation). Alternatively, I could support a rationale that the Man in the Moon is the primary target and it should redirect to that article. Either way, there are many other "The Man in the Moon" works from stage plays, to books, songs, and multiple films. I am not seeing a reason to make the 1991 film the primary target. Best. 4meter4 (talk) 12:06, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @ Standing practice at WP:WikiProject Film is to disambiguate by year when there are multiple films with the same title. Usually we redirect the simple film disambiguation to the film section of the disambiguation page. Best.4meter4 (talk) 16:48, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 1 August 2023
Talk:Citizenship and Entry into Israel Law

message: Is the right name in English for this law "Citizenship and Entry into Israel Law" or "Nationality and Entry into Israel Law"? I've added a redir, and the text appears as both online, but it occurs to me one or the other must be most correct. -- Kendrick7talk 19:39, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I added a fact tag to this mention in the lead. --Tom 13:13, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name?

message: The article is speaking as if July 2008 is still in the future. Was this law renewed again? Is it in effect as of today, June 14 2009? Queerwiki (talk) 03:21, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  2009 

message: Voted back 45 to 15. I haven't seen a good description of how the new law differs from the old one, but this needs to be researched and added to the article. Zerotalk 04:35, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Law is back
Talk:Symphony No. 80 (Haydn)

message: I've added a description of the first movement; please feel free to make corrections of anything that's wrong, and definitely feel free to smooth over my prose; as I'm not sure it really does a great job describing what's happening here, especially for a layman. Heimstern Läufer 19:40, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I was just listening to Adam Fischer's recording of this work in my car.  The three repeated notes that dominate the finale don't sound like normal repeated notes.  Is this done by alternating the strings that the notes are played on like in the minuet of symphony #28.  I've heard that described as bariolage (although the wikipedia article at bariolage doesn't mention the same-note case).  Anyhow, is that effect dictated in the score or did Fischer decide to spice it up? DavidRF 20:17, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have Fischer's recording, too, and I can hear exactly what you're talking about. I don't have access to the score now, but I can look at it as soon as I get back to my university (about 8 Jan), so if no one else gets to it first, I can do it. Leave me a note on my talk page if I forget. Heimstern Läufer 22:09, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: According to Brown, the first and second violins are playing an eighth note apart.  So its not bariolage, but two sections of the orchestra playing the same note at slightly different timesDavidRF (talk) 02:35, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "bariolage" in the final movement?
Talk:Castle Dore

message: Didn't King Mark live here? Colin4C 22:16, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  King Mark 

message: There must be better wording. The site is not enclosed by two ditches as they form part of the site, surely? Perhaps heart rather than site? Or, 'the perimeter of Castle Dore consists of two ditches' . SovalValtos (talk) 10:18, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I think "the perimeter of Castle Dore consists of two ditches" is a good way to phrase it. Nev1 (talk) 10:48, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Site enclosed
Talk:The Yearling

message: I have no idea why someone wrote that the novel takes place in "the roaring 20s." The novel states that Jody was two years old when his father went war, which would set the action in the 1870s. 11 Arlington (talk) 05:53, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Correction to plot

message: Because I am not going to twist the story of novel. The movie is based on The Yearling novel and even if someone try to write plot newly, some words may change but not the plot. 
And I am using wikipedia article for wikipedia article. Is there copyright voilation?
Anyone is free to type detailed plot of novel. Let me see how it differes from what I have copied and pasted.
neo 21:41, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This article is on my list of things to do after adding to the Marjorie Kinnan Rawlings article. But I have to read the stupid book in order to do it. Will edit where necessary when that occurs. Thanks, Neo. --Moni3 23:11, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

text: Information should not be copied from one article to another.  If anything, it's just lazy.  Although the summaries are obviously going to be similar, copy-and-paste jobs = bad.  I've reverted the edit in the hopes that someone will write their own synopsis.  María (críticame) 23:20, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Detailed plot of novel copied and pasted from wikipedia article 'The Yearling (film)'
Talk:Beru Revue

message: I'd like to add a graphic, such as the one that can be found here,
but I don't know how to deal with copyright issues.  If anyone can legitmately add pix to this page, please
do so! Djiann 19:45, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Graphics

message: I created this article, and I believe it is worth keeping. Beru Revue were a major act on the live rock club circuit in Philadelphia in the 80s, with a large and passionate following. They never had a national hit, but their song "Hoods A Go-go" which is mentioned here, was a legit hit in the Philly radio market and possibly somewhat beyond, in the mid-Atlantic region. I don't get logged into WP very much lately, which is why I was late finding this deletion effort, but I would have been very bummed out had it actually been deleted. I will begin to work on improving the sourcing for it, and hopefully stave off any future attempt on its life. Himatsu Bushi (talk) 22:44, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please do not delete
Talk:Valeriy Lobanovskyi

message: I believe that in 1982 Lobanovsky coached Dynamo Kyiv, in 1983 - 1st half 1984 he coached USSR, in late 1984 he came back to Dynamo.  This needs to be fixed in his personal information box. Goliath74 19:46, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Nyenrode Business University

message: There are many private Universities in the Netherlands. Only the Dutch law makes a distinction between the term Universitiet and a University.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.248.50.117 (talk) 17:25, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  universiteit versus university 
Talk:The Deuce (transit bus service)

message: Who makes these buses? 86.132.143.185 19:49, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  See http://www.alexander-dennis.com/news/product_stories/news_story10.htm johnwalton (talk) 15:06, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening comment 

message: One of the pictures overlaps text on both Firefox and IE! --Frank Lofaro Jr. 00:35, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image bug 

message: External link to RTC site  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.234.251.197 (talk) 01:16, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Broken Link
Talk:Marrow Controversy

message: Anyone inclined to expand this section may find the following link[s] useful:
* http://www.monergism.com/thethreshold/articles/onsite/MarrowControversy.html 
* http://www.faithalone.org/journal/2003ii/makidon.html
DFH 19:50, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The content of the controversy
Talk:Bird Watcher's Digest

message: I recommend expanding this article or at least marking it as a stub.  Though the current content leaves a lot to be desired, Bird Watcher's Digest is a major publication in the birding community, and is a legitimate subject for an article.KoopLaFez 19:52, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article read like a publicity piece from the company so I edited out material that isn't germane to the magazine itself and its contents. Rissa, Guild of Copy Editors  (talk) 21:59, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing 

message: The article mentions Hawk Mountain but doesn't say what festival is held there or when. Does anyone here know and if so, could they supply this information? Rissa, Guild of Copy Editors  (talk) 22:05, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hawk Mountain 

message: From the article:  "Knowing very little about publishing, the Thompsons mailed out 32,000 copies of their first magazine in September 1978."
Is this the right number -- 32,000? That's a lot of magazines -- were they going to bookstores? libraries? birding groups?  Also, I think this article needs the magazine's current circulation number. Rissa, Guild of Copy Editors  (talk) 22:09, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Initial mailing and current circulation 

message: I think this would be a better article if there was more information about the magazine itself, major stories (don't go overboard), regular articles that appear in every issue, that sort of thing.  I'd also add two or three more covers to the bottom of the article. 
Is there more information about "Backyard Bird Newsletter"?  I think that would be interesting.
And how about some indication of who subscribes to and buys the magazine -- birders, libraries, scientific associations. etc.  
Rissa, Guild of Copy Editors  (talk) 22:33, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestions
Talk:Only the Lonely (film)

message: '...the Amtrak station in Niles, Michigan, which was renamed to Willoughby...' That's hilarious; as visual joke/homage to a May 1960 Twilight Zone episode. 2600:1700:A760:C10:53:D1CC:5429:938A (talk) 18:04, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Willoughby... this stop is Willoughby.
Talk:List of Daytona International Speedway fatalities

message: This article is somewhat morbid. Not that there's anything wrong with that. Salad Days 19:56, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Morbid

message: *I got a book as a birthday gift and remembered that there had been on AfD on this topic.  There are substantial references to several notable deaths at Daytona's old beach course and at the post-1959 superspeedway, and I'll add them to this article and to the Daytona Beach Road Course article.  If we merge it back into the DIS article, these are some of the most notable (and documented) ones that might be most worth keeping in the parent article.  Dale Earnhardt of course, Frank Lockhart, Friday Hassler (I was there for that one), and others.  Barno 04:41, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *Done for this list and the beach-course article.  Surprised to see nothing on Hassler in the Hinton book's index.  Barno 05:04, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *See my comments about Google "Friday Hassler" on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject NASCAR, under "List of Daytona Intl Spwy fatalities".   Adding more context to the text around the link to the deaths list.  Barno 02:51, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *I used a reference book that I have, plus a Time magazine article to reference everything before Earnhardt's death. Royalbroil T : C 05:36, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Got a reliable source 

message: The Daytona article has enough in it already. This list is a logical breakout of the article that should not be merged, but kept as a separate list. The list does need cleanup, but cleanup is not a reason to do a merge. It limits the ability to expand this article. Royalbroil T : C 05:05, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge request

message: Is there anything left to do before removing the cleanup tag? It is extremely well sourced by solid duplicate secondary sources, complete, and the introduction is rewritten. Royalbroil T : C 06:00, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup tag

message: The list format appears sloppy. Although the "cleanup" tag is no longer needed, cleanup itself should be in order to make the article appear more professional. Doctorindy (talk) 17:28, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm wondering why only half the list is in the table myself. —C.Fred (talk) 01:01, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Table

message: Why do several of these names link to unrelated articles with the same name?  It would be better to remove these links.
15:30 17 October 2008 (CET)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.65.234.37 (talk) 13:37, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unrelated links
Talk:Harvey Kuenn

message: Should Harvey Kuenn be in the Baseball Hall of Fame? He was certainly a top star during his playing days. Not many home runs but he sure could hit.
It's been pointed out that if you double all of Kuenn's statistics, you have a good match for Pete Rose.  So, if Kuenn had managed to stay around a lot longer, maybe he'd have made it. WHPratt (talk) 16:54, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Clock Cleaners

message: To the wikipedia users. I have a complaint to make concerning this Disney short article "Clock Cleaners" 1937. I have never heard Donald Duck using the F word in "Clock Cleaners" 1937. That word didn't even get invented until the late 1960s. Donald Wildmon has made up this false rumor or has misheard Donald Ducks quote. But Donald Duck has said the word Jack-(Donkey) in "Don Donald" and in "The Village Smithy" sorry I can't use the real word. Please fix the article "Clock Cleaners" and take out the F bomb because it offends me and I don't like false rumors spreading on wikipedia. I only want true facts, not made up rumors. CrosswalkX (talk) 14:32, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The article is pretty clear that he didn't say it. However, it is worth mentioning that many people believe he said it. Also, Wikipedia is not censored.—Chowbok ☠ 18:17, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

text: Oh, and it's not true that the word was invented in the late 1960s; according to our article on "fuck", it's been in use since at least 1475.—Chowbok ☠ 18:20, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Donald Duck never said the F bomb in Clock Cleaners.
Talk:Option offense

message: I don't think this is correct. If I understand correctly, "option running plays" refers to a running play with several running options, whereas the "halfback option" is a run-pass option. Statalyzer (talk) 00:56, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Option Running Plays Hotlinking to Halfback Option 

message: The Split T is the original option offense in college football, dating to the 1940s. How many games in a row did Bud Wilkinson win with it? Wasn't it 47 straight games? Dwmyers (talk) 18:30, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split T anyone? 

message: Perhaps adding a line or two detailing that recruits in service academies have physical fitness requirements preventing them from playing linemen who are "fat" might help clear up why they use the option so much.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.7.60.42 (talk) 22:58, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Service academeies

message: I reverted the change that was recently made -- while the option is used on a VERY limited basis in the NFL and it's true that changes to the field and the superior speed of the NFL-caliber defenders does make it much more difficult to run the option successfully; declaring it "useless" and such just didn't seem very neutral to me. ---B- 20:04, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Reverted for neutrality 

message: Although I did not remove the sentence, it is itimated by someone that the tandem of Michael Vick and Warrick Dunn ran the option in the NFL with a level of success not seen in the NFL in some time.  
Being a fan of a team in the NFC South (formerly the NFC West) I have seen the Falcons at least twice a year for the last thirty years.  I cannot think of a time when the above statement proved accurate.  Besides, there is no documentation, unlike the statement made about Brad Smith running the option for the Jets.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.11.92.145 (talk) 17:37, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vick/Dunn option success? 

message: Is the veer counted as an option offense? I'm going to check. I'm also going to find charts for the types that don't have one. Gtbob12 (talk) 12:28, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Veer and charts 

message: I can't find any explanation for the name. Neither does it explain "read option" which is redirected here. Terms must all be defined or the article becomes meaningless to the novice. This isn't a coaching manual, it's an encyclopedia. Rcbutcher (talk) 17:39, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I updated the lede to incorporate how what option refers to.  Basically, it's a style where the offense has several options about what to do rather than have a specific play in mind.  Someone in SoCal Area (talk) 22:13, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: So what exactly does "option" refer to ?
Talk:Stuttgart Ballet

message: Refering to the following passage:
"In July 2019 Mikhail Agrest became the principal conductor of the Stuttgart Ballet.[6] In late 2021 he was fired. The administration of the Ballet refused to give reasons or details to the media.[7]"
The provided information is not correct. The Stuttgart Ballet informed in an official press release about the reasons for the termination of the employment relationship. https://www.stuttgarter-nachrichten.de/inhalt.mikhail-agrest-ballett-stuttgart-trennt-sich-von-musikdirektor.1ca5a7ca-5c18-4cdd-bfa5-8c6085d09924.html https://www.zeit.de/news/2022-01/17/stuttgarter-ballett-trennt-sich-von-musikdirektor-agrest?utm_referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2F
The given sources are very one-sided and there should be more sources to explain this matter in a correct and neutral way. Stuttgart Ballet (talk) 15:07, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mikhail Agrest, principal conductor
Talk:Zhang Fakui

message: General Chang received a British honour and was a resident of Hong Kong for decades. Both the honour and his death took place before Pinyin became the standard. What was his name in English in Hong Kong and British records? 116.48.86.50 (talk) 02:10, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name in English 
Talk:Disputation

message: I corrected the mistake that said Rabbi Moses ben Nachman was also known as Rambam. The Ramban was Rabbi Moses ben Maimonides (Ram=Rabbai+Moses; bam=Maimonides). The ben in between the first and last names means son of and is used in the same manner as ibn in arabic (i believe, don't quote me on it though). Moses ben Nachman is also called Nachmanides. I'm not sure why. I believe that he was writing around the same time that the Rambam and both were considered to be some of the best and brightest Talmudic scholars at the time so Nachmanides shorthand name was probably attached to him out of similarity. Again don't quote me on that and please correct me if I'm wrong.Eli.zeldin (talk) 19:06, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disputation Participant Corrections 

message: I deleted the following section because it confused cognate vocabulary with actual lexemes:
:==Contemporary disputations==
:Today some universities practice scientific disputations. The oral defence of a doctoral thesis/dissertation is called "disputation" in some countries.
The languages that use a cognate of this term do not call dissertation defenses disputations (except in poorly translated English versions of academic policy documents). For example, Norwegian uses such a cognate: (Doktorgrads)disputas; that is, it calls the process a disputas (not a disputation), and (Doktorgrads)disputas would simply mean 'dissertation defense'. Doremo (talk) 19:10, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: That's not quite right. In Germany it is actually called "Disputation", at least at some universities (including the TU Braunschweig, where I will have my Disputation, not a Rigorosum, very soon). See also the German wikipedia article de:Disputation, which links to this article. Furthermore, if this term is not used anymore, it would be nice if this article would link to currently used term (e.g. something like "This article describes the defense of a doctoral thesis before ..., for contemporary usage see ...") 89.182.52.139 (talk) 18:55, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Contemporary disputations" 

message: Is the process of disputation not dialectics? (1. (Philosophy) disputation or debate, esp intended to resolve differences between two views rather than to establish one of them as true)--Inayity (talk) 17:56, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is Disputation not Dialectics? 
Talk:Alex Nicholls (academic)

message: Iam 21 years and born with no control for baul and braz and made many operations and Idont have any improve and i have one leg taller than another leg and idont have any medicine or cure in egybt  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.239.71.125 (talk) 23:02, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Indigence

message: "It referred to the inability of a poor person to support themselves for example through illness or a disability or a lack of work. There was a clear differenciation between poverty which was essential in order to make people work and indigence which was considered unacceptable."
Wait, what?  They can't support themselves because they're injured/sick... Poverty makes people work... but it's not acceptable to be too sick to work... Could we get that cleaned up/clarified? Cantras 20:29, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: For the record, the clarification would have been saying "it referred to poverty due to the inability of a poor person to support themselves", and explaining that 'unacceptable' meant society should not allow it.  For more on 18th/19th Century understanding of the word, see  or . Open4D (talk) 23:30, 4 October 2008 (UTC)