lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Henry Lomb

message: Removed Find a Grave as a reference, that is considered unreliable, and add to external links. Otr500 (talk) 06:34, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: Any insight as to why he was given an English name? Seems out of place for his time and location.50.153.220.230 (talk) 06:53, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name? 
Talk:Charles Christian, Prince of Nassau-Weilburg

message: Why are the references to the Online Gotha by Paul Theroff removed? Because it's a personal website? Please, come on. This website is known in the internation community of serious royalty watchers as one the leading and best sources to excist. HRvO (talk) 00:57, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal Online Gotha
Talk:HMS Adventure (1904)

message: under propulsion she is described as having oil fired steam. then under range it describes her coal capacity.??Toyokuni3 (talk) 17:06, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point, Jane's does not mention them being oil fired. I'll take that detail out. Benea (talk) 17:43, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Discrepancy?

message: i have encountered this term in several other british warship articles. i don't think too many readers, myself included, are completely aware of its meaning. i'm assuming it's a rough equivalent of what would be called in the u.s.n. 'decommissioned'.perhaps some explanation is in order?Toyokuni3 (talk) 15:56, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Paid off
Talk:The Best Damn World Tour

message: This page is a double redirect, and should point to The Best Damn Thing (album). Hersfold (t/a/c) 16:59, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 17:45, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

text: . עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 06:03, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

message: A better redirect would be The Best Damn Thing#The Best Damn Tour. Arthurfung (talk) 04:15, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Happy‑melon 14:17, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect
Template talk:NCAA football season navbox

message: Currently, I just have the template going back to 1900. I think this is sufficient for now. As more years are created, we can update the template to eventually include 1869-1899. Too many red links just looks bad.↔NMajdan•talk 04:12, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I hope that you do not mind that I added to the template. I was creating some of the earliest year articles, and wanted to put the template at the bottom. Cardsplayer4life (talk) 07:27, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template coverage
Talk:Moulsoe

message: I am proposing that the (very little) useful information in the article Caldecote, Buckinghamshire be transferred to become a section of the Moulsoe article. Comments would be welcome, please see talk:Caldecote, Buckinghamshire. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 18:12, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Caldecote
Talk:Process and instrumentation diagram

message: Given that the pages of Process and instrumentation diagram and Piping and instrumentation diagram both contain the same example image, it seems that the distinctions between these two diagrams is trivial or small enough that both diagrams could be covered by a single page on this topic. Any opinions? Jdpipe (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Azeroth (Warcraft)

message: Not enough material here for standalone entry. Could possibly expand but topic is well covered elsewhere. Eddie.willers 00:50, 27 August 2005 (UTC)

message: When has their ever been an Azeroth continent that includes Iron forge? 
There has been one for a lon time and it is asome.
The Eastern Kingdom contains 4 continents; Azeroth, Khaz Modan, Quel 'Thalas and Lordaeron?
Many Kingdoms have risen and fallen but I thought these four kingdoms always remained?? - UnlimitedAccess 21:52, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: All fixed now. I noticed that I couldnt find any reference to Quel 'Thalas as a seperate region after Warcaft 2... so its safe to assume that the land of Quel Thalas has shrunk after the fall of the High Elves and the borders of Lordaeron have extended. I guess it's only natural now that Lordaeron is for the most part Undead controlled and seeping further East and South. I have gone through and fixed it all for Azeroth (world), Eastern Kingdoms, Kalimdor, Northrend and made a little progress on Khaz Modan, Azeroth (kingdom) and Lordaeron too. Regions like Kalimdor didnt state the landmass is divided into North and South Kalimdor so thats all been corrected now. Hopefully now with a hands off approach people's contributions will fall neatly into place. - UnlimitedAccess 12:06, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Technically Khaz Modan, Lordaeron, and Azeroth are all continents, and the Eastern Kingdom is a supercontinent. It gets confusing for Azeroth since there is the Kingdom of Azeroth (that comprises of Stormwind, Elwynn Forest, Westfall, Redridge Mountains, and Duskwood), the Continent of Azeroth (that comprises of the whole kingdom of Azeroth, along with the Burning Steppes, Swamp of Sorrows, Blasted Lands, and Stranglethorn Vale), and the World of Azeroth, so that bit can get confusing... I'm currently correcting the description of the Eastern Kingdoms. --Kaziel 19:44, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Azeroth as a Continent? 

message: Anyone else notice that E A R T H + O Z = A Z E R O T H ?
:Nice spot, but this demon is a far more likely source. AKismet 05:54, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of Name? 

message: I support the idea, as all of the articles that would be merged here do not have any independent notability and thus don't deserve their own articles. Judgesurreal777 22:07, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Same here. Unfortunately, I don't know enough about the subject to be able to perform the merges. Pagrashtak 22:16, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger of unnotable articles into Azeroth
Talk:Reading Symphony Youth Orchestra

message: Just announcing my intentions to develop this page, as well as the possibility of developing a page for the Reading Symphony Orchestra. This article should be expanded within the next 5 hours and then again in about 22 hours - so please wait before nominating this article for deletion because of lack of content or notability. This organization is known throughout the area, has preformed in over 4 foreign nations, and is of great interest to some members of the musical community. Again, I thank you for your cooperation in allowing the development of this page before passing judgment on its merits. Freedomlinux (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:North Crawley

message: I've found a source for a 1398 reference to North Crawley - is there an earlier one anywhere where the North prefix is given? --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 20:40, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Personally I would be tempted to remove it as wild speculation, particularly if a reference can be found that states it was known as North Crawley in the 14th century: it wouldn't have needed differentiating from the Sussex town then; it is unlikely that anyone would have got the two confused. -- Roleplayer (talk) 23:16, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  When did it become North?  Is there evidence for disambiguation from Crawley, Sussex? 
Talk:Penn, Buckinghamshire

message: Mary Berry  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.31.145.49 (talk) 12:46, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  notable residents
Talk:Adventure-class cruiser

message: I understand that two ships of this class were also built for the Brazilian Navy ("Bahia" and "Rio Grande do Sul")? Does WP have an article on them? Drutt (talk) 17:25, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have a source that these ships were members of the class? They were built five years later than the British ships, had greater displacement, length and beam, and different armament. Benea (talk) 19:09, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

text: They were certainly scout cruisers, and similar in general design to meet similar roles. They may be an adapted design of the Adventure class (which if we could find an reliable source would be worthy of a mention here) but my sources don't mention them as being in the same class per se. I'll try and dig some more sources up. Benea (talk) 20:09, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brazilian ships 

message: the main guns are 18 cwt in the text and 12 cwt in the panel
18 in should be 457 mm
pietro2001:760:2C00:8001:C1AD:41B0:EA9B:1730 (talk) 19:13, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  comment 

message: Is
The Sentinels barely exceeded their design speed ...
a misprint of
The Adventures barely exceeded their design speed ...
? If "sentinels" is a technical english term, I would like to know it. thanks. pietro151.29.37.171 (talk) 19:08, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Good catch, copy-paste error.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:34, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  sentinels
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cornwall/Guideline

message: I've just added a section to the guideline about the "Cornwall, England, UK" naming consensus. The intention is that this should make it easier to explain to editors who change it in articles (whether in good faith or not). Happy to discuss.  —SMALLJIM  12:13, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think it was a good idea to adopt this, I don't think the discussion was anything like large enough to produce a meaningful consensus, and I don't think having it in a guideline meantime is a good idea. --John (talk) 10:02, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: This naming format has been a silent consensus for several years, and is used in probably well over 1,000 articles now. My experience over the last two years or so is that apart from occasional irruptions of editors who remove "England" because of apparent Cornish Nationalist tendencies, etc., it has remained undisputed: as far as I recall no Cornwall-article-editor, once the guideline has been explained to them, has made any rational arguments against it.(*) My addition to the guideline was purely for the clarification purpose I described above. If you want to do something about changing the consensus, do - my only interest here is in supporting whatever the consensus may be.  —SMALLJIM  19:13, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

text: (*) My recall was faulty - there was this, and this, in 2011. I vaguely remember reading the first one at the time.  —SMALLJIM  20:59, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Naming consensus

message: Regardless of the consensus reached some time ago, this guideline contains factual inaccuracies, incorrect assumptions and does not take into account recent devolution and naming conventions. This guideline in fact directly contradicts information published by the Permanent Committee on Geographical Names and the United NAtions Group of Experts of Geographical Names. It seems that editors conducted a poll to establish the consensus, without any reference to Toponymic Guidelines. instead using majority POV.
However, the most obvious flaw in this guideline is based on a more complicated constitutional issue. Which put simply is that Cornwall is not administered by England. Therefore defeating the main point of the consensus reached. This was the case even before 2014, but recent years have seen confirmation by the government on this issue.
A Guy into Books (talk) 20:24, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Your statement is untrue.  Cornwall is administered as part of England, and the 2014 decision on the minority status of Cornish people in no way changes that.  Ghmyrtle (talk) 20:04, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Issues
Talk:Quarrendon

message: Quarrendon is a civil parish and is listed as such on the Bucks CC website Civil parishes. - Scribble Monkey (talk) 10:39, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I knew that was the case when I saw the changes last night, I just couldn't find the list on the County Council website.  What I did find is that it doesn't have a parish council and I'm not sure if that matters or not to the accuracy of the article. -- roleplayer 12:18, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like Quarrendon normally has a Parish Meeting rather than a Parish Council, but the role of Parish Clerk is currently vacant. - Contact details for parish councils and meetings . - Scribble Monkey (talk) 12:46, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I see.  That would appear to suggest therefore that the info regarding the civil parish should indeed be re-inserted, and that the edit to List of civil parishes in Buckinghamshire be reverted. -- roleplayer 13:29, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Hi all, If you look back on the article history you will see it was I that added the civil parish ref in June  based on the info on the Bucks CC site. Since then I have been progressively correcting / adding info boxes for the parishes where these were missing or the population data from 2001 census and the Lists of Parishes for the Districts. All was going well until I got to Quarrendon when I failed to find it listed in the COI database under Quarrendon Parish so I tried several post codes from the geographic area where the parish should be and all it produced was Aylesbury CP  with its northern edge sticking suspiciously out where I would have expected the Parish to be. So I looked at the Aylesbury TC site  and see Quarrendon as a ward. Further research unearthed this  which led me to conclude that the parish had very recently been incorporated largely into Aylesbury TC with the remainder of the parish included within other adjacent parishes. The evidence which nails this is to be found back on the COI site  which shows that the outline of the Quarrendon Ward  is almost coterminus with the old parish boundary. The reference to a vacancy on the AV DC site is I think probably just down to the web administrator and Bucks have it listed on the parish page but not elsewhere. Hence my reversion. One interesting phrase in the notification of electoral wards, the pdf above,  is the use of the term 'Parish ward'. Not familiar with this as terminology but concluded it is distinct from a civil parish, hope this helps explains the logic and actions. Tmol42 (talk) 20:07, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems like a comprehensive justification to me. Thanks for the info. - Scribble Monkey (talk) 00:15, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Civil parish
Talk:Radnage

message: St Mary’s Church - a separate page should be created  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C7:9796:2F00:B129:9047:BC61:9371 (talk) 14:19, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: I noticed that Waterend, Buckinghamshire redirects here but there is no mention of Waterend in this page. Is it the same place as Water End? AnemoneProjectors 19:09, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I worked it out - they were the same, but I moved Water End over the Waterend, Buckinghamshire redirect and made a disambiguation page. anemoneprojectors 10:47, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Waterend 

message: There is currently a redirect at , and a link at the disambiguation page The City, pointing to this article, but other than a brief mention of "the residential area known as the city" (lower-case), there is no explanation in this article of this unusual name, and no reference supporting it.
Given that in England, "city" has a very specific meaning, it is very surprising to see it applied to a village (or, seemingly, part of a village). Does anyone have any reliable source for this actually being a recognised place name, or is it just a fanciful insertion by a proud resident? - IMSoP (talk) 15:31, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The City"?
Talk:St Leonards, Buckinghamshire

message: I have thrice reverted a change which has added an apostrophe to the name of the church. The correct name of the church is St Leonards Church. This is confirmed by the citation I added from the Wendover deanery page of the Oxford diocese of the Church of England's website. It appears the editor deb has relied on an entry on the village website which frankly cannot match up to the level of authority of the Church of England. If there are other sites which can provide further clarification lets discuss then her first before making further changes, otherwise it would seem best to leave well alone.Tmol42 (talk) 18:10, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Frankly, the entry I used as my reference the parish website - quite a different thing.  The citation you added does not refer to the church as "St Leonards" but as "St Leonard".  It merely gives its address as "St Leonards" - the name of the village where it is located. Deb (talk) 19:05, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, the church should either be referred to as "St Leonard's Church" (Buckinghamshire County Council) or the "Church of St Leonard" (English Heritage). - Scribble Monkey (talk) 09:22, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of Church 

message: There is a proposal to merge Leonard of Blakemore with this article.
*Support    As per nominator message on adding tag agree the above stub article should be merged with redirect here.Tmol42 (talk) 18:13, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Support the other article consists of one line, unreferenced, and refers to the church – nothing about Leonard himself. Richard3120 (talk) 03:18, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge of Leonard of Blakemore to here
Talk:Stantonbury

message: I've replaced the links that referred to the the no-longer-extant map on MKweb with standard Wp links, number for number. I haven't had time to check them. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 17:57, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location coordinates 

message: If anyone is "going up the city", would they call into the visitor centre, get a pic of the mosaic and upload it please? --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 15:05, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bancroft Villa mosaic: pic needed
Talk:Stoke Goldington

message: If someone wants to write a history section, the article has two external links that could be mined and summarised. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 23:22, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:Waldridge, Buckinghamshire

message: *http://www.historyofparliamentonline.org/volume/1660-1690/member/ingoldsby-richard-1617-85
*https://ubp.buckscc.gov.uk/SingleResult.aspx?uid=MBC1077  
*http://met.open.ac.uk/genuki/big/eng/BKM/Dinton/
*http://www.britishlistedbuildings.co.uk/en-43079-waldridge-manor-dinton-with-ford-and-upto#.VZF5O11wQTU
Uamaol (talk) 18:52, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  source links
Talk:Walton, Milton Keynes

message: The Victoria History, with its meticulous research, says that it is not listed in Domesday, whereas the longstanding text says that it is.  Maybe it is listed under Simpson?  Could someone check and put it back if it can be cited. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 13:22, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Domesday 

message: For some reason, many grid squares within this CP have their own Wiki entry. We need to be consistent and move these to the Walton page. Discuss. (If the consensus is for, or I hear nothing for some time, I will go ahead) --30gl (talk) 17:29, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: As per my comments in the article talk pages, I support this proposal, except for Walton Hall, which is notable in its own right.--John Maynard Friedman (talk) 12:41, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

text: I had not considered merging this article seeing as it had historical value. The other three are just generic Milton Keynes grid squares. --30gl (talk) 16:31, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal
Talk:Wavendon

message: I see Wavendon Gate as enough of a separate entity to warrant a separate page - Walnut Tree has been given its own page and Wavendon Gate is larger. Before I do anything, can I just check that this is OK with everyone else?
30gl (talk) 17:15, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Articles like Walnut Tree predate a preference for keeping the material on each grid-square or district as sections of the Civil Parish article - this is general in UK geography articles. UNLESS the district is especially notable.  I've a Wavendon Gate redirect article that consists only of a #redirect to the section - which doesn't even exist yet???. There is also a case to bring Walnut Tree back into the fold. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 23:03, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

text: OK, I see what you mean. I'll see if I can put together a brief Wavendon Gate section in the article. However, it is my understanding that Wavendon church comes under the same Church of England parish as the churches in Kents Hill and Milton Keynes Village - could you explain how civil parishes differ? --30gl (talk) 12:28, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, see Civil parishes in England. It is the CP that is usually the more relevant for Wikipedia, since it is an administrative demarcation.  Wavendon Gate is in the Walton, Milton Keynes parish. See also template:Milton Keynes parishes. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 19:48, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Just to close this discussion, someone (probably me--𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 16:30, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possibility of new article for Wavendon Gate? 
Talk:Weston Turville

message: According to a plaque in the local Church's kitchen, the Church was extended through funds from Dick Turpin's mother.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.137.67.222 (talk) 18:24, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Extremely interesting though it is, it'll need referencing.  Church plaques have been known to be wrong. -- Roleplayer (talk) 19:07, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Mention Dick Turpin's Mother?

message: The new and very short article on Weston Turville Castle is best merged here for context and to avoid overlap (it is tangentially referred to when discussing the manor). Klbrain (talk) 14:18, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Whitchurch, Buckinghamshire

message: Was the Polish government in exile during the Second World War, at least in part, based here?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.137.67.222 (talk) 22:40, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Woolstone, Milton Keynes

message: * Is there anything in a History of Buckinghamshire that gives the Magna and Parva names?
* Where is it documented that Sister Dora taught here?
Help welcome! --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 22:56, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd check Markham, but I won't be back home where the book is for another couple of weeks yet. I'll look then if I remember! SeveroTC 01:00, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional citations needed 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Denbigh, Buckinghamshire which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 23:30, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Worminghall

message: Should we include a disambig statement for the Locations: Worminghall sourcebook? Details are at http://www.sjgames.com/gurps/books/locations/worminghall/ and it is listed at List of GURPS books#Locations with 4 other places. 184.145.18.50 (talk) 18:17, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Your post makes no sense. You need to post without using jargon and specialist language if you hope to get a response. --Ef80 (talk) 21:00, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: GURPS
Talk:Monaco Coach Corporation

message: Portland Business Journal would likely have additional info to source. Aboutmovies (talk) 03:53, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: How do I find the value of this 2004 Monaco Rogue 36' 36000 miles? 174.251.163.170 (talk) 20:36, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  2004 monaco Rogue classic c value