Template talk:Lemony Snicket

message: Why is Poe listed as a central character? I'll admit he was a recurring character in books 1 to 7, but disappeared until a short appearance in 11 and 12. Aside from the whole Villain/Volunteer speculation, there isn't much importance around him. Surely the Hook-Handed Man is more "central" than Poe? Squidward2602 21:26, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: He was quite important in books 1 to 7, and additional information in Lemony Snicket: The Unauthorised Autobiography shows that he is still an important figure. Perhaps he could be moved to other characters though. smurrayinchester(User), (Talk) 10:32, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mr. Poe - central? 

message: I think that the sugar bowl should be put in the list of other links, because it is a main plot element.  True, there is not much known about why it is important, but I had to search to find information on it. ~~Flamedude 21:41, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sugar Bowl 

message: The other section isn't really needed. Prospero and Queequeg could go into places, the film and video game are big enough ideas they could go to the top, and everything else pretty much could go into a V.F.D. section.-Pacaman 01:21, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I went aheadand changed it, since nobody opposed it.Pacaman 20:16, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diverge the Other Section 

message: What's the basis for deciding if somebody is a secondary or minor character? It seems odd that Jacques would have secondary status when he had only a brief cameo in book the 7th, and the circus freaks have minor status, even though they were major characters in book the 9th and had recurring roles in 10-12. Pacaman 22:13, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Characters 

message: Please make the microscopic font readable, the big bold font normal and turn the template hidden by default. The humankind will be thankful forever. Pavel Vozenilek 02:28, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There's absolutely nothing wrong with this template. Perhaps you're thinking of this template or this template? They're the worst templates in the world, ever. TheMadBaron 10:11, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Worst template I'd seen here so far 

message: I made the added the hide option to the template because it is pretty big. --Pacaman! 17:42, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Callapsibilty 

message: Should the link to the list of boats go under the "places" category? They're not really places, right? Everyoneandeveryone 20:25, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Many events happen on boats/submarines throughout the series, especially in The Grim Grotto. <3Clamster 01:43, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boats=places? 

message: Currently, the template features a navbox called "Untitled series" which offers the show/hide button. The problem is that there is no content in that navbox itself, i.e. it's empty. Perhaps the show/hide function can simply be removed? The only thing provided will be the link to Untitled Lemony Snicket series, which I guess will remain piped to give Untitled series. Do contact me at my talk page for a reply, thanks. Cheers, ANGCHENRUI Talk♨ 14:28, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  No need for Untitled series navbox in template 

message: Are all these individual articles for this series really necessary? I hardly think that something like Count Olaf's theater troupe is a notable enough subject to merit an entire article on its own. -- Vörös  yes?  19:13, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivial Information? 

message: According to everything I can find about this book (e.g., http://books.google.com/books?isbn=0316069868), Snicket is only a contributor to this book. I recommend removing it from the listing of books by Snicket, or making a section devoted to his contributions to larger works authored or edited by other parties, such as his contribution to republication of The Bears' Famous Invasion of Sicily and his unfinished short story in Noisy Outlaws. LlamaScout (talk) 21:20, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  New American Haggadah 

message: Every novel in the template has a year in brackets - e.g. "The Bad Beginning (1999)". Are these really necessary? Other random templates for novel series that I've checked (1, 2, 3) don't do this, and it seems to just clutter up a navigational box that should remain as concise as possible. If no-one replies to this message, I'll boldly remove the bracketed dates in a week (per WP:SILENCE) - navigational boxes should help readers navigate, so dates of publishing or other facts and stats are irrelevant here. Bilorv (Talk)(Contribs) 18:19, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been 12 days. Boldly removed. Bilorv (Talk)(Contribs) 20:40, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates of novels