Talk:Opioid-induced hyperalgesia

message: I know that withdrawal of opioid is not the only option--there is evidence for opioid rotation as a successful strategy dealing with OIH patients. Will look up references and add to the page soon.
Ryan Blum (talk) 01:28, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Yes it is a neutral point of view, as the student edit was made without bias point of view. All information provided on opioid and hyperalgesia derived from scientific journals and are backed up by appropriately listed sources. Information provided are concise and easy to interpret by the public community. Also, information in these edits are coming from different sources which imply correctness as sources are no coordinated. Thus, given that this edit was made with guideline of providing clinical practice information on opioid use and hyperalgesia, and that it is practically impossible to guess the perspectives of the editors while simply reading the article, we can conclude that the draft submission entirely reflect a neutral point of view.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guigui09 (talk • contribs) 22:02, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yao's peer review 

message: There are several sections of this article that my group and I believe can be revised and further developed. Each member has described the edits he/she would like to make. 
First off in the pharmacology section I believe it would be beneficial to include an image of the how different opioids interact with the different receptors. This would be effective in illustrating the strength of different opioid medications. In addition opioid antagonists should also be included so people can understand why certain ones are more effective than others. (Jeffrey Shaffer)
Secondly in the pharmacogenomics portion I believe it would be beneficial to include names of specific enzymes e.g. CYP2D6 and how treatment regimens must be modified if a patient is a poor metabolizer versus an ultra rapid metabolizer. This is particularly important with opioid medications such as codeine and tramadol. (Karan Patel)
Furthermore I believe there should be an additional section outlining the common symptoms associated with opioid-induced hyperalgesia as well as the long term damage it can due to an individual. This will give readers very keen information regarding the dangers of opioid-induced hyperalgesia. (Michelle Lee)
Finally in the management section we would further build on the alternatives to opioids by describing different non-pharmacological and behavioral therapies. After collecting evidence on the effectiveness of these therapies I believe this information would supplement the already outlined treatment options to give a more holistic view of opioid management. (Navkiran Sandhu)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ranaran35 (talk • contribs) 03:50, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  UCSF Pharmacy Students: Proposed Wiki Edits 

message: The edits made by the group were very substantial and contributed depth to the topic. It was very beneficial for the group to include names of specific enzymes (such as how CYP2D6 enzymes affect how a medication is dosed for an individual), since many opioids are ineffective if patients are poor metabolizers. The group also included more information about symptoms associated with opioid-induced hyperalgesia. Wikipedia supports a simplistic writing style so that all users can understand the topic that is being discussed, and I think this group did a great job at fulfilling this task. The content was easy to follow, and the grammar and spelling were all correct.
Jennifershieh (talk) 02:36, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are the edits formatted consistent with Wikipedia’s manual of style? If not, specify… 

message: The draft submission reflects a neutral point of view. I did not detect any bias in the edits for the management of OIH. The group also provided objective information about opioid antagonists. The draft submission provides important and helpful information about OIH.
Eyang92 (talk) 02:37, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does the draft submission reflect a neutral point of view? If not, specify… 

message: Overall, the edits made seem to include reputable sources. Citations were used frequently. The resources are mostly from well-known articles or journals, which made the sources seem more trustworthy. My only note is that for the first few paragraphs, there were several words that included [citation needed] in the article page. I’m not sure if the group edited those specific sections, but this is something that can be improved on. 
Kathyle29 (talk) 02:54, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are the points included verifiable with cited secondary sources that are freely available? If not, specify. 

message: I did not find any evidence of plagiarism. However, as stated by KathyLe29, there are several instances throughout this article that state "citation needed." Although I do not think this is a plagiarism or copyright violation, I do think it is necessary to included citations when required. Other than that, I believe this group did an excellent job contributing to this article with well-cited, reputable sources. (Cindy Nguyen)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cindynguyeen (talk • contribs) 05:48, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is there any evidence of plagiarism or copyright violation?