Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/The Schizofreniks

message: Thanks for your comments and could you give me constructive advise on how to make this article more satisfactory as it is written to be factual and our company has worked with the artists named and I as an individual have worked with all the people named. I went to your google link and it showed up as 700+ different pages found for us. This is not an advert but merely filling in the gaps to another page we are mentioned on. Is it my previous experince that you feel is unnecasary or I I need a seperate page for that? I feel our compnay deserves to be here as an information available for people to learn from. I am happy to make changes as I have never written a page on here before. Thanks. Niki — Preceding unsigned comment added by RecordLabel (talk • contribs) 
:The link shows 89 unique hits. The 700+ are redundant mentions from the same websites. As per the guidelines on conflict of interest you shouldn't be writing an article about yourself. IrishGuy talk 01:56, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

message: I've been reading over your content requirements and feel I could improve the dispute with this article by simply deleting all content other than the first paragraph. 7 songs co-written by Niki are currently featured within the pages of your site and this may count towards the notability factor? Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by RecordLabel (talk • contribs) 
:You have already admitted above that you are Niki. As per the conflict of interest guidelines, you shouldn't be writing about yourself. Which 7 songs are you referring to? IrishGuy talk 00:30, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improvements 

message: Do you have anything at all to say??? Your put downs are getting very boring. In fact I read some of your conversations with other people and you don't seem a very popular person. Quite arrogant and a bit of a jobsworth aren't we?? I came on here to contribute and you have done nothing but make biting remarks which are against wikipedia policy aren't they. You seem well versed in this so you should know. RecordLabel 17:24, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, I haven't made any "biting" remarks to you. While you may not like the fact that writing about yourself is a violation of policy, that doesn't mean I am "biting" you for pointing that policy out to you. You should also know that vandalizing other articles out of anger is not a good way to contribute to Wikipedia. IrishGuy talk 17:40, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

text: I already pointed out where you vandalized another article. IrishGuy talk 18:27, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

text: I haven't "bullied" you. I have pointed out the policies wherein it is a violation to write about yourself. IrishGuy talk 18:27, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

text: I haven't avoided your questions. I asked which 7 songs you refered to which you claimed would illustrate notability. You refuse to name them. Claims of notability must be sourced with verfiable references. Simply claiming that you are responsible for 7 notable songs without actually naming those songs...well, that just isn't enough. Anyone can make a claim. As for my user page being vandalized, if you look at who did the vandalizing, they were all known vandals and not contributing editors who suddenly decided to vandalize my page. IrishGuy talk 18:27, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does Irishguy have anything constructive to say? 

message: Your absolutely right and I will take all users on good faith. Irishguy is only trying to do what is right. I have restored the edits of the page. I will also await Wikipedia intervention and see what happens. Thanks a lot Brad as for a moment I thought I was getting the wrong impression of editors on here, you've been very helpful.RecordLabel 18:30, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thanks Brad 

message: Hi Irish, I went to your page and it looks fine. RecordLabel 18:29, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page edit