lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Template talk:Paisley and Renfrew Railway

message: I thought that the P&RR allowed for direct running of trains to Greenlaw and Gilmour Street. Had a thought on how to depict this an have drawn a blank. --Stewart (talk) 22:09, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The 1914 railway junctions diagrams, also confirmed by the 1896 1:2500 OS map, shows a direct link towards Glasgow and a separate link, which involves reversal, to Greenlaw & Gilmour St. The above diagram is, I believe accurate, if somewhat inelegant. If I'm reading the 1914 diagramme correctly there is both a Glasgow-bound G&PJR link to Greenlaw and a G&SWR link to the P&RR; and a reversing G&SWR (P&RR) link to Gilmour St.Pyrotec 08:04, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  This is my best interpretation of the 1914 route diagram.Pyrotec 08:42, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Westbound connection
Talk:Trans-European road network

message: I deleted this entire paragraph:
* The EU promises that TERN will "promote the carriage of goods and passengers by improving the major highway infrastructures needed by the internal market and the area without frontiers." Community guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network  Opponents, such as the Campaign Against Euro FederalismWho Benefits and Loses from the Trans European road Network System by Brian Denny, argue that it will help transnational corporations to lobby for more road-building while distancing the decision-makers from the protests of local people.
The first quotation is not found on the referenced site, whose link is broken in any case (I did find the correct link and checked the article, however).  The 2nd quotation comes from a site whose link is also broken, and I did not find an updated link. Concertmusic (talk) 17:27, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion of paragraph
Talk:Jesse and Festus

message: please keep this article so people know they are a tag team.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thebluesharpdude (talk • contribs) 15:16, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  keep this article 

message: I missed their debut match, so I didn't actually catch any of their specifics, as you'd imagine, but through most of their vignettes (or at least the first few) they were billed from West Virginia. When did this change to North Carolina? PlaguedKiller  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.142.130.28 (talk) 08:35, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Billed from 

message: i forget his first name but isnt festsus gimmick a ripoff of his exipemenrt in a way
pavlov fed the dog after ringing a bell and as soon as he rang the bell the dog drooled  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.129.220.188 (talk) 00:33, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pavlov 

message: Can it be stated that Jesse and Festus are just re-imagined characters of George and Lenny, respectively. Goblin Knight (talk) 19:40, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Of Mice and Men 
Talk:Silence Is Golden (song)

message: The vocal range of this song is how much, two and a half octaves? --84.115.129.76 (talk) 20:18, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vocal range
Talk:The Day of the Triffids (1981 TV series)

message: The Guardian writes "BBC television productions followed in 1971, 1973, 1980 and 1981" - can that be true ? -- Beardo (talk) 14:24, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other versions ? 

message: With the new version, this ought to move to The Day of the Triffids (1981 TV series) -- Beardo (talk) 14:24, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: We should wait until closer to the start date of the new series; they've only just announced their intentions to remake this so there is little information on what will be the 2009 series yet. Andy1704 (talk) 15:17, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Article title
Talk:Autumnsong

message: Who is the lead vocalist ? It doesn't sound like James, to me. -- Beardo (talk) 13:14, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead vocals 
Talk:Late Night Line-Up

message: Someone has mentioned in multiple edits here on Wikipedia that they appeared to launch the Abbey Road album. Is this correct? DavidFarmbrough (talk) 08:25, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did The Beatles Ever Appear? 

message: Normally the title of a song or short poem is given in quotation marks in Wikipedia and conventionally published sources. Since in this list the title of a work has been given as the name of an item, and is not the thing in itself, it seems absurd to use quotation marks in that context. I have also noted that the serials which made up the original run of Dr Who are also formatted in italics on WP. For consistency therefore, it seemed appropriate to use italics here against the more usual practice. Philip Cross (talk) 18:31, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Italicisation of obvious titles in list
Talk:Semiotic square

message: Is Greimas's square really derived from the Aristotelian square? The example's logical structure is instead that of the Boolean square of opposition. 
AEIO
Aristotelian: A & E can't both be true. I & O can't both be false.
So there are 8 distinct options for compounding: A, I, E, O, A-or-E, I-&-O, T, & F.
Boolean: A & E can both be true. I & O can both be false. And 16 distinct options are produced for compounding.
The example:
masc.fem.~fem.~masc.
allows the Boolean-style square's full 16-fold of resultant distinct options, not merely the Aristotelian 8. It makes no difference if you arrange it like so, 
masc.~fem.fem.~masc.
you still get 16:
<TABLE border=1><TR><TD bgColor=#cccccc colSpan=4>Example's semiotic square's options for compoundings:</TD></TR><TR><TD>strictly masc. or strictly fem.</TD><TD>masc. & ~fem.<BR>(strictly masc.)</TD><TD>fem. & ~masc.<BR>(strictly fem.)</TD><TD>masc. & ~masc. <BR>(or {fem. & ~fem.}, etc.) <BR>(tautologously false)</TD></TR><TR><TD>masc. or fem. or both<BR>(not neuter)</TD><TD bgColor=#dddddd>masc.</TD><TD bgColor=#dddddd>fem.</TD><TD>masc. & fem. (hermaphrodite)</TD></TR><TR><TD>~fem. or ~masc. or both<BR>(not hermaphrodite)</TD><TD bgColor=#dddddd>~fem.</TD><TD bgColor=#dddddd>~masc.</TD><TD>~masc. & ~fem. (neuter)</TD></TR><TR><TD>masc. or ~masc. (and {fem. or ~fem.}, etc.)<BR>(tautologously true)</TD><TD>masc. or ~fem. or both<BR>(not strictly fem.)</TD><TD>fem. or ~masc. or both<BR>(not strictly masc.)</TD><TD>neuter or hermaphrodite</TD></TR></TABLE> The Tetrast 15:35, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: 196684.100.243.155 (talk) 22:15, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remarks of Jean-François Monteil about some basic truths relative to the logical square which must be replaced - the sooner, the better - by the logical hexagon of Robert Blanché. The presentation of the hexagon is to be found in ''Structures intellectuelles'' (1966)  

message: (84.100.243.12 (talk) 14:40, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The version of the article that Jean-François Monteil criticizes above
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Ceres3

message: User:Ceres3
      run at Sat Sep 1 15:32:51 2007 GMT
Image talk:		4
Image:			4
Mainspace		138
Talk:			34
Template:		5
User talk:		137
User:			245
Wikipedia:		84
avg edits per page	2.32
earliest: 21:32, 15 January 2006
number of unique pages	281
total			651
2006/1 	1 	
2006/2 	2 	
2006/3 	0 	
2006/4 	0 	
2006/5 	4 	
2006/6 	1 	
2006/7 	0 	
2006/8 	1 	
2006/9 	0 	
2006/10 	1 	
2006/11 	3 	
2006/12 	5 	
2007/1 	18 	
2007/2 	34 	
2007/3 	28 	
2007/4 	45 	
2007/5 	95 	
2007/6 	151 	
2007/7 	99 	
2007/8 	49 	
2007/9 	114 	
Mainspace
22	Giant Dipper (roller coaster)
4	W32.Myzor.FK@yf
3	Revenge of the Mummy
3	Colossus (Six Flags Magic Mountain)
3	Space Mountain
2	WTF
2	Christa Worthington
2	Calcium carbide
2	Birth order
2	USS Salt Lake City (CA-25)
2	California Screamin'
2	Out and Back roller coaster
2	Fraps
2	Top Thrill Dragster
 	 
Talk:
15	Kingda Ka
8	Giant Dipper (roller coaster)
 	 
Image talk:
2	Maverick footers.jpg
 	 
 	 
Template:
2	AntVandalTool/Ceres3/exp
2	Reb-support
 	 
 	 
User:
91	Ceres3
27	Ceres3/monobook.js
10	Ceres3/Autographs
8	Ceres3/head
6	Ceres3/Userboxes/woodenrc
6	Ceres3/Autographs/list
5	Ceres3/userboxes/amusement park
4	MichaelBillington/MWT/Users
4	Ceres3/Anti-vandal tool/Sandbox
3	Coastergeekperson04
3	Ceres3/December 31
2	Eugene2x/Autograph page list
2	Spartan-James
2	Ceres3/Userboxes/User age
2	Ceres3/sig
User talk:
34	Ceres3
6	Aa1010111
5	RevRagnarok
3	Dusso Janladde
3	Lupin/Anti-vandal tool
3	Jimbo Wales
2	70.71.107.1
2	Wafulz
2	216.105.179.11
2	Samuel Blanning
2	Persian Poet Gal/ads
2	24.143.95.194
2	74.225.107.17
2	Iamunknown
2	Marty360
Wikipedia:
61	Sandbox
8	Village pump (technical)
2	Song/Why your grounds
2	Requests for adminship/Ceres3
2	Song/Don't vandalise this page
2	Song
Ceres3's contribution using Interiot's wannabe Kate's tool Carlosguitar 15:40, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:George Gifford (Puritan)

message: I think the old DNB article has 1620 has this person's death year but the latest DNB online gives 1600;  https://doi.org/10.1093/ref:odnb/10658  --FeanorStar7 (talk) 11:38, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: 1600 vs. 1620
Talk:Catchword (game show)

message: Has anybody ever established how exactly "same root" was defined?  I suppose that, given that Chambers tends to list compound and derived words under the entry of the root word, rather than as separate entries, being listed under the same entry is a plausible way of doing it.  But in the case of homonyms with separate entries, what would happen?  For example, "soundless" and "soundest" are derivatives of "sound" meaning that which we hear and "sound" meaning "healthy" or "in good judgement" respectively.  Do these two meanings constitute different roots, thereby allowing a point to be scored for each? — Smjg (talk) 12:24, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  The "same root" rule
Talk:Michael Jones (soldier)

message: Article reassessed and graded as stub. --dashiellx (talk) 19:37, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: The "relations" date shows him to have lived over 100 years. 
Doesn't match his birth date. 2600:1700:D879:48B0:79D6:7AB4:C2C:28CC (talk) 14:10, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Corrected, thanks Robinvp11 (talk) 13:10, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relations Date
Talk:Askari Mian Irani

message: Is there any evidence this person ever designed postage stamps? Is he just memorialised on a stamp? ww2censor (talk) 14:25, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: yes to both questions - designed reference given in main article - 2 stamps in 1981. was memorialised in 2006 in Painters of Pakistan MS of 10. for online catalogue please visit: www.pakistanphilately.com Rzafar (talk) 07:42, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Stamp designer?
Talk:Asterius the Sophist

message: Is this Asterius the same as the Asterius of Antioch listed on the disambiguation page for Asterius? If so, there should be a link here. If not, the disambiguation page should have a separate entry for Asterius the Sophist. Gareth McCaughan (talk) 00:15, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Same as Asterius of Antioch?
Talk:MonRoi

message: http://main.uschess.org/content/view/6475/355/ says "The first step was to file the patent, which was done in January 2003". Does anyone know what the number on that patent is?  If you own a MonRoi, is there a patent number on the case or in the literature that comes with it? --Guy Macon (talk) 18:16, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Patent number?
Wikipedia talk:Proposal to replace No Original Research

message: (Copied and pasted from WT:N)
An encyclopedia is a repository of knowledge; thus it, like other educational institutions, is a dispenser of information. Thus, it is impossible to merely remain in the background; an encyclopedia can inadvertently make a phenomenon more notable, and might somehow create notability by making more people aware of something. Because of this, usage of Wikipedia - or another encyclopedia - as a mere reflection of information might miss important phenomena going on in the background - phenomena which isn't recorded because nobody has bothered to write it down. How is someone supposed to get Wikipedia, or another dispenser of information, to notice such a phenomenon if all it is is a reflection of what other people wrote?  —  Rickyrab | Talk 02:37, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Addendum. Furthermore, knowledge of some things might depend on primary sources rather than secondary sources (for example, there are some affairs for which Wikipedia page histories themselves document the event occurring, such as the Bogdanov affair). WP:NOR comes up short when covering such events.  —  Rickyrab | Talk 14:37, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nothing - in what I have proposed or in the policy as it stands - has ever forbidden anyone to think anything.  And if you think writing is simply typing out every thought in your mind, then you are not a prolific writer just an incontinent writer. Slrubenstein   |  Talk 10:36, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Why I find fault with WP:NOR

message: I've come to the conclusion (see the NOR discussion page) that there will be no movement toward this proposal without a commissurate outcry against the current policy. I agree with your approach and believe it valid. The question now is how to demonstrate the existence of the widespread discontent we are speaking on behalf of to the rest of the community. Tcaudilllg 00:29, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  No traction...
Talk:Ivan Cheparinov

message: I think the section on the handshake controversy is a bit biased towards Short, it makes it sound like Short was in the right when really it should just report what happened or both points of view. The opposing view (read the http://reports.chessdom.com/short-cheparinov-comments article in the references) would be that a) he refused to shake his hand twice b) short got up and went and found a referee to complain c) the referee incorrectly penalized d) but the penalty was overturned the next day because e) shaking hands is just a recommendation or guideline, not a rule  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Inputable (talk • contribs) 22:53, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I slightly disagree with your version of events, especially with e). It is true that in their protest Cheparinov and Danailov claimed that the FIDE behavioural norms are no more than a recommendation (maybe we should add that this is what they say), but that was not the reason the Appeals Committee overruled the arbiter. They only changed the decision to declare the game a loss because "GM Cheparinov, after his initial refusal to shake hands with GM Short, didn’t clearly reject the arbiter’s request to do so" () and the behavioural norms say that arbiters should give players a second chance to shake hands (). I did add a few words to the article to emphasize that the initial forfeit was overruled (). David Šenek (talk) 11:56, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Handshake controversy 

message: A picture in which Cheparinov's face is clearly visible is already available on the Bulgarian version of the article: http://bg.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A4%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%BB:IvanCheparinov.jpg
46.223.139.61 (talk) 22:18, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Good idea. I switched it. Brittle heaven (talk) 04:21, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better Picture
Talk:Swiss Chess Championship

message: In 1955 the Championship took place in Rapperswil. Here this is linked to Rapperswil-Jona. How do you know it was not Rapperswil, Berne? Any source or just a random wikilink? :) Rgds, --Gereon K. (talk) 16:36, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The article's data was just a straight transcribe of the main source, so no, it's not known which Rapperswil is the correct one. At a rough guess though, Jona is considerably larger (popul. 20,000+ compared with 2,000+) and so may be the more likely to have a venue large enough to house the two events. Brittle heaven (talk) 21:08, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  1955
Talk:Atis Kronvalds

message: He does not belong in Linguists from Latvia. There was no Latvia in the 19th-century. It was split between the Duchy of Courland and the Governorate of Livonia in the Russian Empire. Other Latvians moved elsewhere in the Empire. It makes no sense to try to impose a Latvia where there was not one.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:08, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: He studied at the University of Dorpat, now Turku. This was an institution in the part of Livonia that is now in Estonia, not even now Latvia. So he was not even always resident in what is now Latvia, although how this mattered at the time is not clear because there was no Latvia.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:10, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Not a Linguists from Latvia
Talk:Perfect Dark (P2P)

message: Can someone improve upon the engrish I translated from the Japanese wiki? I speak Japanese, however, I have problems with finding the right words when converting it to English :/ 
by Createur 16:18, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion 

message: Keep title uppercased, as per WP:MOS-TM.--SeizureDog 08:01, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: Since one of the more recent versions, an native English translation has been coded into the program.
This should offer more explanations for the various options and usage of Perfect Dark, is anyone fluent enough in Japanese to make a coherent guide of how to use the program? Should that go into another wiki?
What about reverse engineering to learn about all the encryption going on? Has everythin already been stated on the wiki? Iceman B (talk) 11:02, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  More info on use?
Talk:The Scarlet Pimpernel (TV series)

message: Season 1 Episode 3 character Cecile was played by Winter Uklarik.  Winter Uhlarik is now known as Winter Ave Zoli
(Uklarik (Surname has inflections))
Timelord2067 (talk) 13:38, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Winter Uklarik / Winter Ave Zoli
Talk:Linthorpe

message: Linthorpe is actually covered by 2 wards, the Linthorpe ward and the Park ward. 
The are known as "the village" falls within the Park ward, not the linthorpe ward, yet it is not stated in the article. The whole of linthorpe needs to be represented in this article, not just the portion of linthorpe within its namesake ward. I do not know why my contribution was removed. 
Also regarding the population for the linthorpe ward, it is now outdated as the ward boundaries have changed since 2011. According to Middlesbrough Council https://www.middlesbrough.gov.uk/open-data-foi-and-have-your-say/about-middlesbrough-and-local-statistics/ward-profiles the linthorpe ward https://www.middlesbrough.gov.uk/sites/default/files/Linthorpe-ward-map-2019.jpg has 6,270 and the park wardhttps://www.middlesbrough.gov.uk/sites/default/files/Park-ward-map-2019.jpg which has the other half of linthorpe, has 9,257.
[User:Yorkteessider|Yorkteessider]] (talk) 11:56, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Linthorpe and Park wards
Talk:Ayub Ommaya

message: --------------------------
Dr. Ayub K. Ommaya, the youngest son of four children, was born on April 14, 1930 in Mian Channu, Pakistan.  His father Nadir Khan was a Jemadar in the British Indian Calvary (Bengal Lancers) and his mother Ida was a housewife.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fugu99 (talk • contribs) 00:45, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
Talk:Delta L problem

message: last time I was here I had it so "9x25 super auto" would go 9x25 Dillon which is its real name but I will change it to 10x25 Norma.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.84.18.214 (talk) 02:20, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The 9x25mm Super Auto G is an Austrian pistol cartridge design and was C.I.P. registered on 17-05-1991. It is not the same cartridge as the 9x25mm Dillon. The 9x25mm Super Auto G is dimensionally somewhat different from the 9x25mm Dillon dimensions stated in the 9x25mm Dillon Wikipedia article. In the QuickLOAD internal ballistics software suite the C.I.P. 9x25mm Super Auto G and wildcat 9x25mm Dillon are listed as 2 different cartridges. The discussion at http://pistolsmith.com/viewtopic.php?t=28099 indicates both cartridges are necked down 9 mm variants of the 10 mm Auto, so it looks they are 2 executions of the same basic idea. The 9x25mm Dillon is up to now unknown by C.I.P. and can therefore impossibly be described in C.I.P. documentation.--Francis Flinch (talk) 18:16, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  9x25 Dillon constant changing
Talk:Moon Over Parador

message: I moved the article Moon Over Parador to Moon over Parador in accordance with WP:CAPS and WP:NCF, which say that prepositions shorter than five letters should not have an initial capital. Note that IMDb still has this title as "Moon Over Parador"; I guess that IMDb uses a different convention for capital letters within a title. --Mathew5000 22:11, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Million Pound Property Experiment

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources.  Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  — Diannaa (talk) 12:52, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Donna Ares

message: The article should be moved to Donna Ares, her stage name.--Zoupan 13:03, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, she seems to be best known under that name. Tried to move it myself, but there seems to be a redirect that prevents the move. GregorB (talk) 21:04, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name