Talk:Knabstrupper

message: I have cleaned up and expanded the Knabstrup page. I have also tried to add an image.
But I am not sure if I have done so correctly.
MW
:Is the information on the Kabardian horse page the same as the info on here?  I think someone got their breeds mixed up, and put the wrong name with the wrong breed, unless the Knabstrup is also known as the Kabardian.  Just curious...  Morgana 12:52, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Most appear to have this build, so if there are others, it is better to add the other body types than to delete useful information.  Montanabw(talk) 19:15, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  June 2006 

message: I placed 2 copyvio notices with </div> markers here, in an attempt to blank out text apparently lifted directly from here. Must have done something wrong, as the url doesn't show and the article is blanked right to the end. Sorry about that. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 14:39, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I've put what little I was able to salvage from the article in the temporary location requested, Talk:Knabstrup/Temp, which seems to be a talk page. Unfortunately, that little seems to be principally a collection of errors (it is connected to the Appaloosa, warmblood is not a conformation, breed standard and registration is carefully administered in Denmark, the horse marketed in the USA as "Knabstrupper" is apparently a Knabstrupper/Appaloosa cross, etc.). Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:35, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Whenever the copyvios hit in these old, neglected articles, a quick jaunt over to Google books and the horse breeds encyclopedias can save the day.  Dana boomer often can do a very good and fast job of rewriting and cleanup without the hassle of the copyvio tag process if you ask her and she has the time.  But if you want to fiddle with this article and fix it up, go for it.  My RL is swamping me and I can't believe how much piles up on WP when I've neglected my watchlist for three days!  =:-O  Montanabw(talk) 16:59, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, was going to do that. Or rather, had done that, but reverted and put copyvio instead. Editing would have removed the copied stuff from the article, but not from the history. I'll try to write something from the official Danish site. Don't really know why anyone here is worried about copyright if Google can scan and publish 15000000 books and not get prosecuted; they must be a little less sure of their ground in Europe, though, as we don't get access to many of them here (including those horse encyclopedias).Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:47, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Which is why I don't think it's that big of a deal to have an admin remove previous history, just getting it fixed now is what matters most.  Let those who fuss do the fussing, let those who fix do the fixing!  Montanabw(talk) 23:46, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio 

message: Seems the website(s) for  [Knabstrupper Association of Denmark] has been migrating over time.
* knabstrupperforeningen.dk] (2000-2013) Has some English pages. Still active online as an 'archived' website. 
* knab.dk (2013-2019) Has an English sub-site. It is still active online as an 'archived' website.
* knabstrupper.dk (2021-current) No English found. 
 ▶ I am Grorp ◀  08:02, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Danish Knabstrupper association website 

message: the distribution has a lot more locations including The US, Canada, Australia, the UK, and many others that I dont recall. There is a concentrated effort by breeders worldwide to bring this magnificent horse back from its endangered status. 2600:1012:B15A:7E3F:6575:438E:C4D3:D8F6 (talk) 00:01, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distribution