lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Glåmdal

message: Back in April 2019 the proposed merging Glommadal into Glåmdal, giving the justification (in an unsupported reason field in the merge template):</br>
.</br>
Thoughts? Klbrain (talk) 16:35, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Given no objections,  Klbrain (talk) 13:38, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Innherred

message: Any reason this article is placed at the archaic spelling "Innherad"? Although I have come across such a spelling, it is almost exclusively known as Innherred, which is also what it would be called orally. To use things that take its name from the district, there is Innherred Sykehus (since renamed to Sykehuset Levanger), Innherredsferja, Innherred Produkter, Innherred Renovasjon, Innherred samkommune  Sør-Innherred prosti and Nord-Innherred prosti. I cannot think of a single institution that uses the term "Innherad". Arsenikk (talk) 23:10, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Innherred or Innherad
Talk:List of American institutions of higher education/Archive 1

message: Under Hawaii, I suggest that the University of the Nations be deleted as it is not an accredited 4-year institution.  The introduction to the list doesn't specificy that an institution has to be accredited to be included, but it seems to me that that would be a reasonable criteria.  Comments?  John Trapp 18:16, 13 Jan 2004 (UTC)

message: Note that there are several other U.S. territories (such as American Samoa) that, as far as I can tell, do not have any institutions of higher learning in them. Because of this, there was no reason to create listing pages for them. However, if any of these territories do have any colleges or universities, please create listing pages for them and add links to those lists in the "Other Areas of the U.S." section (or let me know about them so I can add them). --Cswrye July 5, 2005 20:47 (UTC)
:There is indeed a college recognized by the Department of Education in American Samoa.  NCES' COOL website/search engine is most helpful in quickly and easily searching for colleges and universities recognized by the Department of Education.  --ElKevbo 16:08, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Old comment indeed (2005!). :)  --ElKevbo 16:56, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  U.S. Territories 

message: Can someone please explain how we arrived at these regions and their constituent states?  They don't align with either US Census regions or IPEDS/NCES regions.  Are these standard throughout Wikipedia or arbitrary for this article or...?  --ElKevbo 16:04, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe they were copied from their respective wiki articles.  You may want to ask on the talk pages for Northeastern United States, Midwestern United States, Southern United States, Western United States or Wikipedia:WikiProject United States regions. panda 16:31, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks!  These appear to be derived from the Census.  One could make a argument that this particular list and other US education-related lists should use the NCES regions but I'm not entirely sure that would be a worthwhile change.  I think there is more for me to learn before continuing down this path.  --ElKevbo 16:49, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Regions
Talk:List of municipality numbers of Norway

message: The article claims: "The numbers originate from 1946, when four-digit codes based on ISO 3166-2:NO were assigned to each municipality." This cannot be true, since ISO 3166-2 apparently wasn't published until 1988. So, where and/or when did this numbering system really originate? - dcljr (talk) 01:41, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Addressed. - dcljr (talk) 02:44, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin
Wikipedia talk:Meetup/NYC/Directions

message: On directions from Grand Central it says go to 59th, but on nearest subway stops, it says 77th and 86th are closer. We need to fix this. Smartyshoe 20:31, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question

message: The page is all about how to get to a restaurant at 228 East 58, while the meetup page says it's a picnic at "[[The Great Lawn, Southwest quadrant, just north of the Delacorte Theater (see map)".  Maybe a version clash?  Jim.henderson 02:52, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Great Lawn or 228 E58?

message: Yeah I just noticed some of the mass transit directions are incorrect. They're from the NYC meetup from December 2006. I've started to update some of the info. Wl219 02:34, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect directions

message: I got here by Googling "wikipedia meetup manhattan".  Not a problem for me but I bet someone will get confused, given the lack of a specified year.  Jim.henderson (talk) 16:45, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Obsolete?
Talk:James Blair (South Carolina politician)

message: This article was started using public domain information from the Biographical Directory of the United States Congress. LarryQ 20:33, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article does not explain the nature of the feud leading to Blair's attack on Green. Valetude (talk) 18:09, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Feud with Duff Green
Talk:Hyper Music/Feeling Good

message: I don't know why anyone is trying to revert it back to calling Feeling Good one of the "worst covers of all time" when the linked article clearly states it is one of the best- read it!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.154.16.30 (talk) 02:42, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No. If the worst covers are selected, being in the top 5 is not a good thing. --AmaltheaTalk 10:07, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, it mentions the top 5 best covers in the last 2 paragraphs. -- I need a name (talk) 21:58, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'll be damned ... well, at least I wasn't the only one who misread it. :( Thanks for the heads-up. --AmaltheaTalk 22:50, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment
Talk:Annapolis Convention (1786)

message: Agree with merge proposal. Two articles, same topic. Geraldk 20:52, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: only 11 are listed
Charleebraun (talk) 17:54, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: St. George Tucker was missing for some reason. Readded. NW (Talk) 00:36, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: 12 DELEGATES

message: A lot of confusion arises here from the idea of civilization being a shallow interpretation of law and order, where law takes legal precedence over order, instead of the prior original idea of our Founders who established a supreme order firsthand before later utilizing the law as a means to this supreme end.  In other words, the order was first established as a natural law by our Founders within The Declaration of Independence before they later established the law within The U.S. Constitution as a means to this end -- with that end being our Civil Purpose.  
This is a very subtle point.
Our Founders didn't create a new Democratic Republic, with this being thirteen separate nation-states balanced with a federal government, based on the former traditions of legal precedence which was usually the case beforehand.  No!  They utilized the scientific method in use during their time which was natural law in order to establish for the people a new Civil Purpose.  After establishing this new natural law, they then had just cause to divorce us out from under the rule of a former tyrant / tyranny before marrying us to a "more perfect union," or what can be thought of as a necessary tyranny, one that can be improved on forever. 
This is also a very subtle point.  
The sovereign states spoken about in the Articles of Confederation were legal separate nations but united.  
This too is a very subtle point.  
Therefore, the best a so-called nationalist can be is a state rights advocate.
The federal government is not a state government just as a Democratic Republic is not a nation. 
This too is a very subtle point difficult to understand.
In conclusion, a person who is a nationalist or believes in nationalism should be considered a "confusionist," or "one who has been confused by the legal system of law to the point of ignorance."   
  
The prior information is all based either on original thoughts from the author, within formal documents created by our Founders, or on general knowledge.
50.10.183.240 (talk) 23:55, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The so-called Nationalists were in contempt of the people's original Civil Purpose.
Talk:Anies Baswedan

message: This article needs some editorial attention:
* Proper links to Wiki subjects (Wiki articles instead of outside links)
* References (footnotes)
* Fixup of links to outside websites
Cbdorsett 06:52, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikifying

message: As Baswedan became a more important political figure in Indonesia, a lot of information is missing. I will attempt to translate and add information from the Wikipedia Indonesia page. Maybeitschris (talk) 20:56, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing Information

message: Not only the above still not done - but external links is unnecessary SatuSuro 11:27, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Excessive external links

message: I put the POV tag because I think that this article needs to be thoroughly reworked. Muhraz (talk) 05:21, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: This article still need more work but it doesn't need POV tag. Just because this small edit from an IP user, you erase one paragraph from the lead section. Hddty. (talk) 10:07, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yeah, the original paragraph is full of redundancies, unnecessary, and highly biased. Not that kind of stuff you'll want to put in the lead section of a BLP. Muhraz (talk) 11:49, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 

message: Lovely as it is, what's the relevance of the family portrait? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:45, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Family photo
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement/Articles needed

message: :Can you update the list?  I would be willing to work on some articles.  I think it just makes it easier to look through if we get rid of the 300 or so that are already done.  Blahblah5555 (talk) 20:06, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Can we remove the articles that are no longer red-links? That would make it easier to tell what still needs to be done. -- 159.182.1.4 23:09, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

text: Uhh - yeah. Would love to see it regenerated. Can it also help update List of articles about Mormonism? -Visorstuff 00:42, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Is there an issue with the recent edits I've been making to Wikipedia:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement/Articles needed? All of them were recently reverted by  without a real explanation, so I reverted to last version before his revert and am bringing the issue here before I do anything else to that page. -- 159.182.1.4 23:14, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You'll have a better chance of not getting reverted if you register a username with wikipedia - may editors think major edits by IP addresses is typically vandalism. It's easy to register, and we'd love to have you aboard! -Visorstuff 23:34, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for the invitation, but actually the account I can use while editing at other locations already appears on the WP:LDS participants page; I'm not allowed to "logon" to any web-based resource from this IP address, or identify myself personally, although there is obviously more than just me editing from this IP. I do have great concerns about anyone automatically assuming an edit is vandalism just because it comes from an IP. As I recall, the WP vandalism study actually found that about a quarter of all vandalism is cleaned up by people editing from IPs. The trend of assuming bad faith on the part of IPs seems to be most prevalent among those doing recent change patrol in an effort to gain enough experience points to become a Dungeon Master (read Administrator), but I'm not interested in playing that game. The key is the edit not the editor, and anything else can become a distraction from building an encyclopedia. -- 159.182.1.4 00:02, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: To clarify, I do believe that Administrators play a very useful role at WP, but like most positions of trust, those that are actively pursuing it as the main goal of their efforts also tend to be those that are least qualified for it. -- 159.182.1.4 00:27, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

text: I completely agree with you. I'd rather have good content from anonymoous editor than stupid ones from registered users. However, this is likely the reson for the revert. glad you are a participant. -Visorstuff 00:23, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Miss New Jersey's Outstanding Teen

message: Should this be merged into Miss New Jersey?  Dreadstar  †  21:03, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: This article could really use some images.  It would help illustrate the article's subject.  Dreadstar  †  21:51, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Photos
Talk:Margaret Sanger Clinic

message: A photograph without the saffolding would be desirable.--Wetman (talk) 22:15, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: * When they finish construction, I'd be happy to oblige.  I was there two days ago and the entire front of the building remains is sealed up, the current photograph is better, believe me. dm (talk) 02:02, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

text: I see, I see. It's been some months since I passed by. It's a handsome house, untypical of New York style, with that big segmental bay. --Wetman (talk) 07:23, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Photograph
Talk:Bodhinyana Monastery

message: Because the abbott's bio is included in this article - this article falls within the bio project SatuSuro 11:39, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Status

message: # The monastery is located in fire prone forest - and various issues arise from such a situation
# as a monastery was reported in international press for the womens ordination;   
sufficiently inherent and separate from the abbots details- the above post from 2008 was wrong has seen the bio stub removed - and agree with prod nominator - notability is not inherited - however sufficient notice in international and local media SatuSuro 12:16, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Prod
Talk:Cicindela

message: Should be used for the list (yes this means some accompanying text should be provided).  However I don't know what the added info in the NZ list means so I am not sure what to do with that one. — jdorje (talk) 21:05, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikitables 

message: I identify two difficulties with the lists on this page. 
# the list on this page omits Cicindela_maritima
# the list of Cicindela species provided on this page is redundant with List of Cicindela species
*I propose to eliminate this list from this page, merging it into the List of Cicindela species as necessary.  jw (talk) 08:46, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lists  

message: I am unsure of the original intent of those Latin quotations in this section. 
*This section including the quotations needs a thorough review and clean-up. jw (talk) 08:46, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: use of ''Cicindela elegans'' name
Talk:Paso Robles station

message: An editor placed a tag on this article suggesting a lack of sources. The article, at present, contains basic facts concerning location, level of service, and usage, all of which are sourced from official publications. The veracity of this information is not in dispute and can be considered reliable. If truly necessary, I have discovered an article from the Sacramento Bee which mentions the existence of an Amtrak station in Paso Robles, and further directs its readers that the Coast Starlight may transport them there. I have also located the station on Google Maps , and humbly offer this as proof that a third party concurs with Amtrak (and the Bee) that there is an Amtrak station in Paso Robles, and that it is located more or less where Amtrak claims. All the information presented herein is referenced through these publications, verifiable, and undisputed. Unless we're going to indulge an almost solipsistic view on sourcing I'm going to remove the tag. Mackensen (talk) 21:07, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Relevance/Review A

message: I suggest doing as I did for edg's "Overall" point. I used these steps: (WikiLen)
# I made a new section Overall to address his comments on "Overall."
# I copied edg's comments that I wanted to reply to from his Wikipedia:Relevance/Review A.
# And pasted these comments into the new section I created at the talk page for relevance.
This keeps all the discussion in one place — a good thing. —WikiLen 01:16, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please keep all discussion on the Relevance talk page
Talk:Kizil Caves

message: Hallo, I recognized that the data which was given to this picture is based on wrong information:
*1.:The term "Sassanian style" was used in the wrong context.
What have been described is the wrong picture. The right one is Fig.1 on page 8 in this document: http://www.sino-platonic.org/complete/spp084_mummies_central_asia.pdf
The "Tocharian" Colour Plate on page 9 is not fiting to the description of Fig.1. So, the description is wrong. We need a correction of the information given in this document. I've informed the User  Per_Honor_et_Gloria about this problem.
- Maikolaser (talk) 11:34, 15 March 2012 (CET)
:Discussion at talk page on commons and at Talk:Tarim mummies.--92.229.35.175 (talk) 17:17, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problems with File:QizilDonors.jpg 
Talk:Hatebeak

message: The claim "Hatebeak is the only band to have an avian vocalist," although linked to an article, is an indefensible claim.  There exists, at least one other band with a bird singer: Naegleria Fowleri, so the claim is outdated, at best.  Perhaps the claim should be removed or revised to either "Hatebeak is (outdatedly) reported to be the only band to have an avian vocalist," or "Hatebeak was reporterd to be the first band with an avian vocalist," with the same citation.  I think the first option is better, since someone may come along at a later date and say that another unknown band existed
prior to Hatebeak that was composed entirely of bald eagles or something.  You never know.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.161.109.154 (talk) 14:06, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Claims of the form X is the only Y to have Z...
Talk:Golden Light Sutra

message: Every existing citation is broken. There is a lot of assertions given with no citations at all. Can this be fixed? I don't know anything about this sutta. Aaronasterling (talk) 21:35, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations 

message: This article contains many superlatives such as "most important Mahayana sutra". It sounds like an advertisement for this particular sutra. Aaronasterling (talk) 21:36, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Balance 
Talk:1991 Swedish general election

message: How did the moderates win with fewer votes and seats?  AJUK </font>Talk!! 13:31, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It doesn't matter which party gets more votes.  It matters what political party coalition gets a majority of seats in parliament.  The left wing bloc (Social Democrats and Left Party) got only 154 seats out of 349.  That's less than half.  The right-wing bloc (centre, christian democrats, moderates, liberal democrats) on the other hand got 170.  Still less than half, but the votes of the new New Democracy party boasted them up to 195.  more than half.  so the right wing bloc wins.  this works the same way in almost all parliamentary democracies. —Vikingviolinist (talk) 13:51, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: ...at least those which have coalition governments and a proportional electoral system. But for people familiar only with an essentially two-party system with majority elections, I understand it may seem strange. Tomas e (talk) 19:19, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  I don't get this
Talk:Kṣitigarbha Bodhisattva Pūrvapraṇidhāna Sūtra

message: the punishment of the sin one committed in the text is much severe than those in modern criminal laws
http://www.sinc.sunysb.edu/clubs/buddhism/ksitigarbha/chap4.html
or either, moder criminal laws are need to be reviewed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.14.152.15 (talk) 06:26, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New version of the sutra is needed....as 

message: The wiki is "This sutra is fundamentally a ...(Shih 2001, p. 68) " now. I change it coz this link is only the content of this sutra but talking nothing about a conclusion such as 'This sutra is fundamentally sth'. Besides, this link is a web page but it says page 68. What is page 68 here? Mahengrui1 (talk) 01:00, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove ambiguity content of "Sutra Translation Committee of the United States and Canada" 
Talk:1979 Swedish general election

message: "This was the only time a non-socialist government was re-elected in Sweden between the 1920s and 2010."
I'm not fond of the word "re-elected", because the government just before the election and the one just after it were not composed of the same parties. I have, however, found a more accurate starting date. Harfarhs (talk) 00:01, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps "This was the only time a non-socialist government retained power in an election between..."? Number 57 00:03, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: True, or perhaps even better "..non-socialist parties.." Harfarhs (talk) 18:15, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Cool, I've amended it with that. Do add the year from the 1920s if you have it. Cheers, Number 57 20:57, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phrasing
Talk:Kawaguchi, Saitama

message: I will remove some less notable or unsourced events from the list and put them here. Feelfree to discuss. I have rough criteria in mind, but typing them would be too long. Circeus 10:43, August 06, 2011 (UTC) The years are missing from the copied elements.
* Sogo Departmentstore Kawaguchi
* Ario Kawaguchi
* Aeon Shoppingmall Kawaguchi Cala
* Aeon Shoppingmall Kawaguchi Green City
* Lala Garden Kawaguchi
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.23.5.48 (talk) 10:44, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Departmentstore and Shoppingmall

message: I will remove some less notable or unsourced events from the list and put them here. Feelfree to discuss. I have rough criteria in mind, but typing them would be too long. Circeus 10:43, August 06, 2011 (UTC) The years are missing from the copied elements.
Exterior product company of Kawaguchi Giken, precision plastic product company of Enplas, molded plastic product company of Ryoke are headquarter and major plant in Kawaguchi. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.23.5.48 (talk) 11:00, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Economy and Industry
Talk:Alter ego/List of alter ego examples

message: * Spider-Man is the alter ego of Peter Parker in the Spider-Man comics.
* Atem, or Yami Yugi is the alter ego of Yugi Mutou in the manga/anime series Yu-Gi-Oh!. 
* Anima-Lizzie is the cartoon alter ego of Lizzie McGuire in the TV show of the same name.
* American Dragon is the alter ego of Jake Long in the Disney animated series.
* Anastasia Beaverhausen is the alter ego of Karen Walker on Will & Grace.
* Angel and Angelus are good and evil alter egos of the vampire whose mortal name was Liam, in the TV series Buffy the Vampire Slayer and Angel.
* Art Vandelay is the alter ego of George Costanza in the television series Seinfeld.
* Bartman is the alter ego of Bart Simpson in the animated TV sitcom The Simpsons.
* Batman is the alter ego of Bruce Wayne in the Batman comics.
* Bananaman is the alter ego of Eric Wimp in the Bananaman series.
* Black Panther is the alter ego of T'Challa in the Black Panther series.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 45.51.93.193 (talk) 05:41, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: List of alter egos in fiction
Talk:The Barfly

message: With the exception of the points specifically marked, all the information on this page can be verified on the page in the external link (Barfly's own page). I have removed the "no sources" tag as a result. Fork me 21:33, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: The only Barfly still open is the one in Camden.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.147.83.208 (talk) 00:16, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs Rewriting