lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Healer (role variant)

message: Wasn't she an S-type? She never seemed at all like an abstract thinker.
ISFP.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.104.42.181 (talk) 19:53, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: No, she identified herself as a Healer INFP . ThreeOfCups (talk) 00:36, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lady Diana? 

message: This article and INFP have large amounts of overlap, since they represent the same type, including the list of persons. It seems to be logical to merge these. I suggest merging this article into INFP and turning this one into a redirect. Any other similar pairs of personality type articles should also be merged. Dcoetzee 05:18, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Disagree. The Healer is a role of the Keirsey Temperament Sorter, whereas INFP is a classification of the Meyers-Briggs Type Indicator. The Keirsey system is based on the Meyers-Briggs, but they are still different, and the tests are done differently. Pocket PC 2000 (talk) 01:57, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

text: Agreed. It would be best to have all the related information in one article anyway. Rashaalam (talk) 22:25, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

text: Disagree. I do not think the articles should be merged since INFP and The Healer come from different personality tests. 8 May 2013  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.18.193.174 (talk) 17:53, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

text: Neutral. It would definitely make logical sense to have two extremely similar typologies in the same article; however, there seems to be some disagreement about whether or not Myers-Briggs and Keirsey are equivocal. Furthermore, there are concepts including socionics that both utilize Myers-Briggs equivocally, but maintain that despite their common origin they are not identical, although it is not clear to me at this moment exactly why the two are so universally kept separate. I have also found that in many cases one typology is not mentioned without the other. Austinenator (talk) 21:50, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

text: Disagree. Although the INFP and Healer articles have similar content, the mentioned personality typologies are made by different psychologists. If the articles contain  exactly identical  content, it is absolutely recommended to merge them. But they have different details, and there are significant practical and theoretical differences between the two. The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator is for thought-based personality, the Keirsey Temperament Sorter is for  action-based personality.  The personality tests match on the general concepts, but they do not match in their mechanics. TheCaretakerTemptalk 11:37, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Architect (role variant)

message: Would it perhaps be prudent to merge this article with the article about INTPs?   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.32.128.14 (talk) 18:54, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

message: I'm removing most of the "Distinguished Architects" section because it seems pretty un-verifiable :).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by BrickMcLargeHuge (talk • contribs) 22:05, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: People

message: I really want to list L Lawliet from Death Note as a notable Architect... I know it wouldn't fly though because he's not a real person, but it would make INTPs all over the world feel so much better. But Albert Einstein's on the list so there's not too much reason to worry. NERVUN (talk) 12:14, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The list of notable Architects needs better sourcing or it becomes NN trivia --Guerillero | My Talk 22:09, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  L (Death Note) 

message: The most common architectural trait I have observed is a favorable attitude toward the self, we may be egotistical.
 Personality Traits
Openness to experience	
Conscientiousness     	Scrupulous, meticulous,
Extraversion          	Gregarious, outgoing, sociable, projecting one's personality outward.
Self-esteem           	A "favorable attitude toward the self". An individual's sense of his or her value or worth, or the extent to which a person values, approves of, appreciates, prizes, or likes him or herself"
Novelty seeking       	exploratory,
Perfectionism         	"an internally motivated desire to be perfect."
Alexithymia           	The inability to express emotions verbally. "To have no words for one's inner experience" to prefer to express emotions graphically and with numbers
142.0.102.55 (talk) 23:42, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: List of personality traits associated with architects by an architect
Talk:Greenwich Pizza

message: Picture of cresida tueres 112.208.3.37 (talk) 12:37, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture of cresida tueres
Template talk:Infobox caste

message: Do we need the India flag on this template. Might suggest some sort of official sanction for the caste system to someone who doesn't know much about India. deeptrivia (talk) 06:28, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, well pointed out. Nobleeagle  [TALK] [C] 06:40, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Infobox should just be renamed caste since there are multiple caste systems in multiple countries.--D-Boy 10:20, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

message: I admit here that I'm coming from a position of ignorance here, but looking at a lot of the articles relating to clans and caste, I'm wondering in the South Asian context, what do those terms exactly mean? It also seems like there's a lot of technical terms involved here, I'm wondering if a glossary list might be useful, especially since these terms might require some context and elaboration for full understanding. Jztinfinity (talk) 00:55, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: That is a very nice explanation. In my experience, "subdivision" is another word sometimes used & in particular by anthropologists. And in the last day or so I have seen a "People of India" citation where the author(s) talked of "segments", although in that case the meaning seems somewhat ambiguous. - Sitush (talk) 23:14, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clan vs Caste 

message: See Reddy, it appears some editors think a special handcrafted infobox is preferable to this one. Frietjes (talk) 15:39, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: That is quite common - see my note above on 11 September. - Sitush (talk) 15:51, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  It appears as though this one has resolved itself with the last edit not being a revert.  Definitely drop a note here if there are more problems.  The old handcrafted one was a mess.  Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:03, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resistence to the usage of this template 

message: Hi all, I'm not familiar with the world of castes. Can there be some expansion to the documentation for these parameters, please? I recently noticed this edit where an editor added a ton of prose to . The content was clearly unsuitable for the parameter, but when I looked up the docs, there was no indication of how to properly use this or many other parameters. I do notice that in 2011, Sitush recommended the removal of a number of parameters above including . Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:36, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Classification parameter, etc 

message: I got to this page by investigating what looks like broken markup on the Rajput page.  On that page, and in the Usage section of this template page, the infobox/sidebar appears to me as having only a lone "{", and following the infobox, outside the infobox, is a the markup of fields.
However, Template:Infobox caste/sandbox looks correct, to me. Going back in history, everything appears broken, also. Other infobox templates render fine.
AnmAtAnm (talk) 21:36, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox markup broken?
Talk:Inventor (role variant)

message: I agree with 76.176.186.107 that the TypeLogic examples aren't very good. I'm in favor of removing them (in fact, removing any that don't come from Keirsey) if we can get consensus to do that. This list has been in progress for a long time and many editors have contributed to it. ThreeOfCups (talk) 05:34, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable Inventors

message: ENTP is the main correlation, so why are they said to be introspective  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.163.144.45 (talk) 02:54, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: "Introspective" correlates to intuition. "Expressive" (as opposed to reflective) correlations to extraversion. ThreeOfCups (talk) 04:30, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introspection
Talk:Mastermind (role variant)

message: Hey ThreeOfCups, the sources are all from the same person, they are: Keirsey's book, his personal website, and a blog article he wrote with his son. I think it's a problem that this article is only using Keirsey as a source, so that's why I added the notice. --Aronoel (talk) 15:20, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes it is. I also wonder when all those historical persons made the test, especially Isaac Newton, and if so, whether the test results aren't private property of their respective test person. To me it seems to much like an astrology styled marketing, and not quite scientific. Rursus dixit. (mbork3!) 07:35, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: This article is about Keirsey's Mastermind. If it's from another source (such as a Myers-Briggs practitioner), then it's not Keirsey's Mastermind—it's something else. ThreeOfCups (talk) 02:55, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  One source notice 

message: The article states that a Keirsey Mastermind type corresponds to the Myers-Briggs INTJ type. It then list Arnold Schwarzeneger as an example. The I in INTJ is "introvert". Surely Arnold Schwarzeneger isn't an introvert. Everything I've ever seen of him suggests the polar opposite.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.9.176.129 (talk) 05:40, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arnold Schwarzeneger
Category talk:Computer network security

message: I'm no expert in this field, but it seems like we could use subcategories for security-related protocols, hardware solutions, practices/strategies, general vulnerabilities, and maybe products.  I've never created a new category, but I imagine the politics is trickier than the technical requirements.  Maybe it should be expanded into digital network security:  would a cellular phone network fall into this category? If I don't hear any protests, I might start fooling around with some subcategories and see who complains. Ojcit 06:31, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. We could separate the "Computer Network Attack Techniques" of the "Computer Network Attack Tools". I sorry for my english. --186.124.163.83 (talk) 10:50, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: subcategories
Talk:Bioassay

message: "measurement of the concentration of known substances (alternatives to the use of whole animals have made this use obsolete)"
...of course also possible using cell cultures!
The definition is cryptic -- at least for the layman. The sentence defining bioassay does not parse (at least I was not able to parse it). I could not understand why and how 'active principles' (whose principles?) comes into the picture. What does "that" refers to in "that of"? I propose to change the definition somehow, but I am not an expert on bioassay by any means, so I won't risk suggesting specific changes.
Szepi (talk) 21:25, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  quantification
Talk:British National Formulary

message: Many nurses and Pharmacists are in fact independent prescribers!!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.26.107.12 (talk) 22:58, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Non-prescribing healthcare professionals??
Talk:Xtreme Martial Arts

message: The word "sickest" as used in this article is highly subjective and improper. I'm going to remove it.
Eno-Etile 06:35, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Quality issues aside with either article, Extreme Martial Arts and Extreme martial arts should be merged.  I suggest using this article (lowercase "martial arts") as the destination article, since this is arguably not a proper noun (except insofar as it's used as one in marketing efforts by Century Martial Arts). —Erik Harris 13:30, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *Strong agreed, I do not see problem. Carlosguitar 03:38, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In the absense of any dissent, I've merged the two articles and created a redirect from the other article to this one.  Since both articles are such short stubs, merging them was simple. —Erik Harris 13:25, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from Extreme Martial Arts 

message: I'd like to keep this article NPOV. Designating XMA a sport rather than a martial art helped a lot. However, it does seem to me that XMA has roots in the martial arts, so that's why I've included martial arts, along with gymnastics and acrobatics, as one of the elements that are combined into XMA. I think that only mentioning gymnastics and acrobatics gives a false impression of what XMA is. I've made the edit, but I'd like to open up the discussion to hear other points of view.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.250.37.2 (talk) 14:20, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with you. It is a sport that has been taken from martial arts. I don't think it has technically been given "martial art" status yet, especially because it is a branch off from martial arts. I have found what you said verified in a website online. I will be adding some material and the reference as a source soon. Ryt 007 (talk) 19:35, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  XMA and Martial Arts 

message: I added a lot of content. Most of it came from my head, supported it by adding to web sites to the list of references. Feel free to format or alter the text. Added to the lead. Added a history section, techniques section, and a locations section. Changed criticism section heading to controversies (more PR and NPOV I think). Changed References section heading to notes, and moved it after all the content. This is how I have always seen it structured, and believe it to be a good way of doing things. Could use more references, more talk about the sections, and maybe another section or two. Ryt 007 (talk) 20:19, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additions 

message: Since Michael Chaturantabut is a living person, references in this article to him that were not sourced by reliable sources have been removed promptly. Jesse Crouch (talk) 04:40, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Chaturantabut

message: Currently, most of this article is sourced from the xmarevolution.com website.  The controversies section is completely unsourced.  Please see Wikipedia:Reliable_sources#Overview for more information.
Jesse Crouch (talk) 05:05, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs reliable sources
Talk:London Bridges

message: *London Bridges → London Bridges (novel) —(Discuss)— pages are identical —Jvelez 21:11, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Earlier proposed move

message: Extensively chopped down the plot summary. I've read this book and it's not that detailed.--206.27.244.160 21:01, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot summary 

message: Without the "why" it's just violence... 217.155.151.38 (talk) 08:52, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A set of terrorist attacks "to get the world's attention". To what end?
Talk:International nonproprietary name

message: I just added the bit about why this is not always a good naming principle, in light of the case with Cephalexin, to better inform people who may be clicking through.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.45.11.48 (talk • contribs) 23:49, 16 September 2010
:You just happen to be wrong - the INN is with the "f" (old BAN with "ph" now long since replaced in BNF and all UK GP prescribing), and as consensus of other editors stated at Talk:Cefalexin. David Ruben  Talk  04:04, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Cefalexin

message: Article does not say. Once proposed can it only be rejected or recommended or is there a third state of preliminary or under-consideration (ie proposal-accepted) ? How long can an INN stay as 'proposed' ? - Rod57 (talk) 12:46, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  How exactly is an INN proposed, and how does it become recommended ? 

message: What is the primary language for INNs? Is it Latin or English, or are the 7 language names of equal preference? --Djadjko (talk) 01:54, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you sure the question is meaningful? —Tamfang (talk) 23:23, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:   if I was sure, I wouldn't ask ;) Maybe the wording is bad. From another point of view: what language from the 7 has priority (to specify a drug name), if neither is the official one of some country? --Djadjko (talk) 22:47, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Primary language 

message: How is the Chinese name made?
Is it a pseudo-phonetic transcription of some kind?
Based on putonghua?
Can you provide a pinyin transcription of the Chinese examples?
--Error (talk) 11:15, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chinese
Talk:Wilhelmshaven Power Station

message: I stubbed this article, since I could not make any sense of the machine translated stuff:
"it covers the mean load need and has an assignment of up to 6.000 hours annually. In the power station become daily approx. 6,000 tons of hard coal needs. The power station is supply-technically favorably convenient, since in the close Tidehafen of the Jadebusens ships with a loading capacity can put on hard coal by up to 100.000 tons. The power station, which fire-place high over a 250 meter orders, desulphurised flue gases as the first in the Federal Republic its."
Those fluent in German can take a look at http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kraftwerk_Wilhelmshaven to add more information. Gzkn 06:41, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stubbed
Talk:Competitive antagonist

message: Competitive antagonist may send dose-response curve to right, but it's a different kind of 'shift' depending on reversibility
for reversible its the exact curve, but shifted right
for irreversible its the same curve, but not shifted right -- instead, its the same curve but with a lessened response for each dose value
for reversible, maximal response is still achievable
for irreversible, maximal response is lowered -- which makes sense because there is effectively less available receptors  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.243.17.246 (talk) 11:22, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Thorotrast

message: The text as it stands could the be framework for a very interesting article (the relationship to Egas Moniz being particular intriguing) but unfortunately so far no one who really knows the sources seems to have taken an interest in it.  Isn't there some pharmacologist or radiologist who can flesh out the story and add sources? EEng (talk) 21:12, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interesting historical topic, but needs work! 

message: I agree this is an interesting topic and would love to see it fleshed out further, but for the time being I think the article is concise, clear, and well cited for the claims it makes. Heyinternetman (talk) 14:12, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed cleanup tag
Talk:Transdermal patch

message: Cleaning THIS up. God.
"The highest selling transdermal patch in the United States is the nicotine patch which releases nicotine to help with cessation of tobacco smoking. Correction fentanyl is now the number one selling patch." Menthol Cigarettes (talk) 12:09, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Correction?

message: The article Salonpas has been proposed for deletion; that's fine since that article is largely advert. In my experience, though, 'salonpas' is, like 'kleenex', commonly used as a generic term for the type of products the company makes. Transdermal analgesics, typically methyl salicylate or capsaicin, are common over-the-counter remedies in Japan, and I think they've recently gone on the market in the US. I don't know about the market elsewhere. I wonder if transdermal analgesic pads are notable enough to warrant a separate page? or a section of this one? Cnilep (talk) 16:20, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Comments are welcome on a requested move at Talk:Salonpas. Cnilep (talk) 17:29, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transdermal analgesics 

message: When listing types of patch (matrix, reservoir, etc) the "Vapour" patch is clearly written as a sales pitch for some new product not actually delivering any drug, except maybe menthol.
I think this needs to be addressed but I'm not qualified to do it!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.26.245.250 (talk) 20:42, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Vapour Patch" 

message: the terms transdermal & dermal aren't very well known so people who may be contemplating using one of these & looking for info will know them as sinply 'patches' (which is what a Brit GP will most likely call them). So how about putting these on the patch disambiguation page under 'medical'? 86.150.255.56 (talk) 09:46, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Searching  

message: There's two of the same image. 27.137.187.148 (talk) 07:50, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image repeated 

message: the Wiki article on lidocaine mentions a 5% lidocaine transdermal patch can be used as analgesic. this article does not mention Lidocaine at all. She3sha3y5 (talk) 11:52, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  lidocaine patch? 

message: SafetyEdit
Micro Needle Patch (MNPs) might be another choice of safety compared to direct injection using candlestick.... 218.214.182.85 (talk) 20:16, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  correction
Talk:Heinrich Köselitz

message: wasn't koselitz jewish in ancestry?
:Not to my knowledge. Sources?--Chef aka Pangloss 18:45, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: But he was almost certainly fucking Nietzsches sister. Unsourced...--178.197.236.59 (talk) 00:53, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ancestry 

message: In her 1901 book, The Philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche, Page 8, Grace Neal Dolson claimed that Peter Gast’s real name was Bernhard Cron. Nietzsche had wanted to publish his Human, All Too Human under Cron’s name.Lestrade (talk) 19:26, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Gast
Talk:Toxication

message: There seems to be little difference between this article and the article on toxification. Are these different terms for the same process?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.100.249.35 (talk) 18:25, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Toxication vs. Toxification 

message: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9131484
http://ucelinks.cdlib.org:8888/sfx_local?sid=Entrez:PubMed&id=pmid:9131484
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6422171
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18690955
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22079668
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6990842
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6990842?dopt=Abstract
ZhenC (talk) 04:43, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potential Relevant Sources 

message: There are some changes that I would like to make here.
Introduction:
The various effects of metabolic products, such as mutagenesis and teratogenesis, could be mentioned here and discussed in further depth in the following sections.
Examples:
1. Expansion of more details for each example of toxication, for example, the enzymes involved and how they would catalyze each reaction.
2. More examples could be added here, such as the relationship between toxicology of chocolate to dogs and the metabolism of theobromine.
ZhenC (talk) 05:10, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure, be bold and go ahead. No such user (talk) 10:10, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plans for Proposed Changes 

message: — Assignment last updated by Ullanki ganesh (talk) 22:36, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Molecular Genetics