Talk:Horizons (Epcot)

message: no move
The "(Disney)" part of this page's title is unnecessary, as nothing else in Wikipedia is specifically named "Horizons". Besides, the page has a disambig at the top of it, just in case anyone comes here by accident. - Brian Kendig 01:59, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one sentence explanation, then sign your vote with ~~~~
* Support – if there's nothing else with the name "Horizons", then I agree that the "(Disney)" part is unnecessary.  (Brian-- you should only need to keep voting open for two days or so; I don't think this will be particularly controversial.) --bdesham 02:56, 27 September 2005 (UTC)

text: I agree that it's not a big deal, but there already exists a page at Horizons (a redirect to Horizon) and I'm not an admin so I don't have the ability to move the redirect out of the way, so I figured I'd take the official route so that, if accepted, someone else could move the article for me.
* Oppose.  Just do Google on "horizons" to convince yourselves that there is a lot of un-Wikipediafied content that is likely to conflict with this move in some near future.  And this is for a no longer existent attraction ride!  The word "Horizons" is too popular for this particular meaning to safely exist without the (Disney) modifier.  For example, the University of Cincinnati's alumni magazine is called "Horizons": UC magazine "Horizons" website.  -- Mareklug talk 14:29, 27 September 2005 (UTC)

text: Test Track goes directly to the page for the Epcot attraction even though there are other uses of the term "test track". The Land goes directly to the page for a series of books under this title even though there are other uses of the term "the land". If there eventually become several pages in Wikipedia for things named "Horizons", then Horizons should go to the most common usage, with a disambig to the others. - Brian Kendig 16:05, 28 September 2005 (UTC)

text: If someone's looking for Horizons, I think they first thing they'll type in is "Horizons", not "Horizons (Disney)". - Brian Kendig 16:05, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move (27 September 2005)

message: I've heard recently on a Disney podcast someone reading off the entire article of Horizons. Doesn't that count as plagerism? Walt Disney 21:45, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Podcast Stealing 

message: Seeing as how there isn't another ride named Horizons, I feel the EPCOT Center name in the title isn't nessecary.
:Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one sentence explanation, then sign your vote with ~~~~
*Support as idea creator. 01kkk 17:18, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of EPCOT from page title 

message: When I went to epcot on my honeymoon, my new husband and I got to go on the second floor of the Horizons building because he was a GE employee. They served free food and drinks and, when we left, got us on the ride ahead of the line. I don't remember the details and could not find an online source. I think this should be a part of the article. Can someone add it?Mellie107 (talk) 23:07, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Secret Upstairs Party Room with Perks for GE employees 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Horizons (Epcot). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110307030534/http://horizonsresurrected.com/ to http://horizonsresurrected.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:22, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified