Talk:Albuquerque Plaza

message: This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 03:20, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating

message: I am proposing a merger of Hyatt Regency Albuquerque into this article. We don't need a separate article about each tower; even far more noteworthy multi-tower complexes like the Petronas Towers and World Trade Center are covered in single articles. As it stands, the two articles overlap substantially. Camerafiend (talk) 22:37, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: *While it is true that the two towers are now separately owned, the complex was built as a single project and originally had a single owner. The towers are really not even separate buildings as their first two floors are shared. I don't feel like it is a big deal that the towers have different uses; other mixed-use developments which include both office and hotel components are covered in single articles. My main concern with having separate articles is the large content overlap between them. Currently the Hyatt article is a virtual duplicate of the Albuquerque Plaza one, and I am not convinced this could ever not be the case. The towers were designed by the same firm and built at the same time as part of a single project, so most of their history is the same. I just don't think the Hyatt tower has enough coverage that is independent of the complex as a whole to justify a separate article. Camerafiend (talk) 04:01, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

text: * both article are/have already 'diverged' significantly...a merger is inappropriate and the ill advised.--emerson7 23:00, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

text: *Sigh. Valid arguments on both sides here. The way I see it, this is basically a choice between 2-3 short articles with quite a bit of overlap and a single, more thorough treatment. Apart from the redirect problem (which is not insurmountable), I still think this would make more sense as one article. The complex and its architecture and history could be described, and then we could have sections about the two individual towers describing their uses and any other information that doesn't apply to the whole complex (which I don't think is very much). If a lot of new information comes to light in the future we could split this back out, but right there just isn't very much. Btw, my only point with the WTC example was that 1 WTC and 2 WTC don't have separate articles (despite being separate buildings, and the two tallest in the state). Camerafiend (talk) 04:10, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: *1 WTC and 2 WTC are a tad different.  They had the same owner and were virtually identical in size, appearance and use. Vegaswikian (talk) 18:18, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger 

message: In lists of largest buildings, this is referred to simply as Albuquerque Plaza.  However, just as One World Trade Center is the tallest US building, rather than the generic World Trade Center, it seems we should be using the name of the actual building rather than the complex.  Not being from the area, I don't know enough about this to add information.  CTBUH just lists it as Albuquerque Plaza as well, but that doesn't mean they are well informed on this building.  Please note here if the name should be reorganized.  Thanks!
JeopardyTempest (talk) 07:40, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I was wondering this too. The owner of the building, Allegiance Realty, still has it listed as Albuquerque Plaza, so for now I am going to assume the name has not been changed despite US Eagle acquiring signage rights. Camerafiend (talk) 15:27, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is US Eagle Plaza (or Tower) the name of the single building