lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Korea Baduk Association

message: : I've moved this "Questions" section (the following 2 lines) from the article to here Trafford09 (talk) 22:27, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Membership 
Category talk:Spanish politicians

message: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Spanish_politicians
When I wrote (talk page) about: I ask 4 help 2 do it: Núria Albó i Corrons (instead of ( inside #C )) versus ONLY: Núria Albó
I pointed # the letter: C, Núria Albó ( vs "Albó i Corrons") Núria Albó i Corrons
And I wrote: I cannot CHANGE it. Because I have to learn more about wikipedia. Today (5 months later) I've come again and I see that point is not here. And a more important thing: The subject was only the bad/wrong alphabetical sorting of Spanish names with "nombre, primer apellido y segundo" (there are 1st & 2nd surname versus anglosaxon 1st & 2nd names & ONLY one surname ).
Like, I only focused in one people ( Núria Albó i Corrons ), and today it isn't & I see many others in the same way: wrong sorting. My discussion is not updated because I think the work I must do now is looking for the Spanish ones and sort it right.
Maybe I'll do it. Ciao 62.14.133.96 08:06, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong alphabetical Spanish sorting of this names
Talk:Claude Vermette

message: Full disclosure: Claude Vermette is the brother-in-law of my grandmother. I created the article only because I saw that there were redlinks at Saint-Laurent (Montreal Metro) and Beaubien (Montreal Metro) and have limited myself to what is available through the one decent reference I could find online (his agent's website) and a fairly indisputable note about his late wife. For contrast, his late wife Mariette Rousseau-Vermette, my grandmother's sister, is more well-known but doesn't have any redlinks apart from the one I created in this stub, so I haven't gone and created that article. If anyone has any Wikipedia:Vanity concerns, do call me on them. — Saxifrage ✎ 07:56, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Manuel Colom Argueta

message: While marking this article as a stub, I was struck by the sentence "Assasinated in 1979 during a time of great political repression by the extreme right wing military dominated government".  I'm not sure if this is a fair representation of the situation, but the language is strong, so I marked this so someone more knowledgable on the subject might weigh in. lowercase 08:03, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have reduced POV element and shown assassination in context. Hopefully it is ok to take the NPOV notice off but I'll leave it there for a bit to gauge opinion. Mtiedemann 13:54, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree leaving the NPOV tag for a few days is a good idea.  My impression, though, is that the new language is much more measured and reasonable.  Thanks for your work on this article. lowercase 17:38, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: Colom Argueta → Manuel Colom Argueta … Rationale: Article title should reflect his name, Manuel was his forename and was used, currently title is just his two surnames. Mtiedemann 13:55, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
*Support. Seems obvious enough. Bolivian Unicyclist 17:34, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Moved. —Nightstallion (?) 10:42, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: :Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
*Support. Seems obvious enough. Bolivian Unicyclist 17:34, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved. —Nightstallion (?) 10:42, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Gingalain

message: What version is this bit about Bleoberis and King Mark in?--Cúchullain t/c 08:09, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It says it's related to those, and perhaps the source of some of them. It's not a source for Percival, but reflects a similar motif popular at the time.--Cúchullain t/c 21:13, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The text says a Lion of Ermine, but the earlier illustration clearly shows a unicorn... Mastakos (talk) 21:33, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heraldry
Template talk:History of the Netherlands

message: Ok thank you. With the addition of the Batavian Revolution my feeling of this era named rise and fall of the republic is satisfied; and I agree the Batavian Republic was a prelude to monarchy. Arnoutf 08:17, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Batavian Revolution

message: Hi all; I like the template, but I have a question. The list is fairly long and detailed, and does not fit equally well on all page (cf Eighty Years' War). Would there be a possibility to have a 'short form' with only the major era's (ancient time - and not subdivide in Germanic tribes etc), for inclusion on some pages? Arnoutf 18:12, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Short template

message: Something like this?
The Dutch Republic
The United Provinces
Eighty Years' War
The Battles
Treaty of Westphalia
 Edit this template
  
Perhaps with reference to History of the Netherlands
Perhaps a link to History of the Netherlands; something like this? Arnoutf 20:13, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Templates 

message: I have been playing a bit with the collapsible navtemplates. I think it may be usefull to design these in a nested way for the Netherlands series, because these smaller templates distort articles to a lesser degree, while still containing all the information. I know the one below is far from finished, but just as a showcase before I start tweaking. Post here what you thinn of this idea, thanks Arnoutf 16:52, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  How about a collapsible template?

message: I've added Dutch Empire onto the list referring to the History of the Netherlands, and was going to add the VOC and GWIC, but decided to just stay with what the Dutch Empire for now. Considering the impact the Dutch had in the colonial world in the 17th-20th centuries, I felt that it was absolutely necessary to have a link, If there's a problem with it, though, contact me on my page about it. Thanks for reading! LeftAire (talk) 02:11, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding Dutch Empire
Talk:Norberto Ceresole

message: This article centers to much in Ceresole's presence in Venezuela which is not consistent with the time he spent in this country or with his writings as I see only one of his books dealing with Venezuelan issues. Also there is almost no relation between the lead and the body of the article. JRSP (talk) 13:21, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia is not a forum. Do you have some secondary reliable sources to support what you say? JRSP (talk) 23:25, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undue weight
Talk:Houndoom

message: I removed the POV tag because it is not argued why it should be there. -- Face 13:50, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality

message: I've made numerous revisions to the article in the form of minor rewordings or grammatical corrections. I've also linked some things that probably should have been linked, such as Pokémon names and TMs. I don't know how to link the TMs to go directly to the TM section... so, would someone do that? Thanks. I'll continue making any little corrections I think are necessary, since no discussions are taking place on the talk page. Revert them if you don't like my revisions. *shrug* As long as you post something on the talk page. Vancar 21:26, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corrections everywhere 

message: The biology section seems to contain information that doesn't really have too much to do with the actual biology of Houndoom. Anyone think this should be altered? Vancar 18:32, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biology vs Behavior 

message: First of all, I think the whole movesets paragraph should be removed from the video games section, and it's pushing the needle into the unencyclopedic section, but that's not my main point here.  I'm concerned with the phrasing of the attack "Hidden Power Grass".  That's not the name of the attack.  Could someone find a better way to write the attack while keeping the grass description in?  Like "Hidden Power (with grass power yadda yadda).  --Brandon Dilbeck 00:58, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hidden Power Grass 

message: I was thinking that perhaps Houndour and Houndoom are both inspired by "The Hound of the Baskervilles". It would make sense, as the Hound was said to be a vicious dog that would attack from the shadows. Both Pokémon attack mainly in the cover of darkness and are known for their intimidating appearances. Just athought, though I'd like to include it in the article. Does anyone object to adding it in?- Floramage! 16:05, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've had similar thoughts myself, but then, where did the inspiration for the Hound of the Baskervilles come from?  We'll be going around in circles, especially as the naming controversy section was deleted (and good riddance). -Kain 02:00, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Hound of the Baskervilles 

message: In the article, it says that the only ways to get Houndoom in the third generation games are from Colosseum and XD Gale of Darkness, but this is not true.  Houndour can be found in the altering cave in Fire Red, Leaf green and Emerald under certain circumstances and Houndour is also found in Emerald naturally.  Once a player has the National pokédex, an extension of the safari zone opens, containing several National pokédex pokémon, including Houndour.  In all of these cases, the Houndour can be evolved into a Houndoom.  It says so on Houndour's article.  If you still don't believe me, check out tihs link... http://www.serebii.net/pokedex-dp/228.shtml
:Please go ahead and edit any article you feel needs to be edited.  Wikipedia is the encyclopedia that anyone can edit! --Brandon Dilbeck 08:15, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  How to obtain inaccuracy
Talk:Luis Tascón

message: it articulate is not neutral, when including phrases like this:  to perpetrate a potential crime against humanity according to Article 7, section (h) of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.--K4zem 08:40, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The editions done by user JRSP is more neutral and balanced. Bye.--K4zem 13:59, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editions by JRSP 
File talk:Watch 020.jpg

message: *This file should be deleted.  I don't think there is any connection between DIA's tent roof and that of Market Street Station's roof (though if you can provide a direct citation I'd stand corrected).  Additionally, although the bus in the photograph is the same kind of bus (regional) used for SkyRide, this particular bus was not operating that route at the time it was taken.   --BetaCentauri 08:58, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion?
Talk:Krannert Center for the Performing Arts

message: one of the only renowned, is as impressive as the venues, the most famous and largest? This reads like a fanblurb. ~ trialsanderrors 08:59, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: I've heard this rumor from a couple of UIUC alumni and students, that the Krannert Center was originally Abramovitz's final project and he got a low grade (like a C on it or something) and his teacher told him it was an interesting design but it would never work. Can anyone validate this for me?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.126.67.144 (talk) 19:02, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rumor
Talk:The Kingmaker (audio drama)

message: Tempted to make wikilinks in the cast last, but probably too spoilerish?  Morwen - Talk 00:32, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Seyton and Clarrie would be massive spoilers, but it is underneath the spoiler tag.. Tim! 16:47, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why was Jon Culshaw asked to play the fourth Doctor rather than Tom Baker?
:Because Tom Baker has continually refused to play in the audios. --Johan (speak to me, human) (yes i've been here)  —Preceding comment was added at 20:36, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Why wasn't Tom Baker asked to play his Doctor?

message: The negative tone of the critical reception section seems a might over-powering, given that it has just one review by a person who may or may not have anything of value to say (it could be original research, after all). Personally I found the play to be enormously enjoyable, and well worth the listen: interesting characters, a decent mystery to it all, and the change in tone about which the reviewer spoke being well-executed, to keep things interesting (added to which the “Northern” accent of Richard was an even more spot on impersonation (of Ninth Doctor actor Christopher Eccleston) than Culshaw’s Tom Baker)! Has anyone seen any other reviews or indications of a positive reception for this drama (e.g. how did it fare in the Doctor Who Magazine reader poll)? Jock123 (talk) 16:54, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Critical reception…
Talk:Gopaldas Neeraj

message: Please specify reasons for marking it for rewrite.
*I am copying the reasons from Wikipedia:Cleanup: "Unwikified, possibly copied from somewhere, in any case the style is completely inappropriate and needs to be rewritten." - Mike Rosoft 15:28, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm proposing a merge from Gopal Das Neeraj.  It seems pretty clear that these are the same guy, but I wasn't certain, since the birth date's different, so I figured I better check first.  Anyone object?  Thanks, delldot | talk 22:25, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: By the way, if we want to merge back to Gopal Das Neeraj, that's fine.  Does anyone know which is the more common usage?  The International Hindi Association has it written both ways. delldot | talk 22:30, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Many thanks to Xcentaur for completing the merge! delldot | talk 21:39, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You're welcome  Happy editing! xCentaur |  talk   07:44, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge from [[Gopal Das Neeraj]]

message: Tarun shienh maybe is the same person.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ValterVB (talk • contribs) 10:03, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: Source in Gujarati about Gopaldas Neeraj. -Gazal world (talk) 15:31, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source in Gujarati
Talk:Bobby Beale (EastEnders)

message: He's Bobby, not Robert, Garry named him after Bobby Moore. Trampikey 09:24, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes but can anyone legally be called 'Bobby'?  I'm pretty sure you can't officially register someone with a name like that even if they're called that for practicly their whole life. Sparhelda 03:25, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You can name your child whatever you want, there's no law against any name in the UK. -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 08:25, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Unless its not actually a name... Sparhelda 15:17, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Bobby is a name. It remains that you can name your child anything - I know people called Sam which isn't short for Samuel, and Danny which isn't short for Daniel. It's perfectly legal and normal. -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 16:58, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

text: It shouldn't have been because he was named Bobby. As for saying it's not actually a name, all I can say is it's more of a name than Brooklyn or Chardonnay. Lots of names aren't actual names. Sparhelda, if someone can't be legally named Bobby, then someone also can't be legally named Alfie, yet it's the 16th most popular boys' name in England and Wales in 2006. Those children are legally named Alfie, not Alfred. Bobby's name is Bobby. — AnemoneProjectors (zomg!) 21:44, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I did see the birth certificate recently and it did say "Robert" but it was obviously an error by the props department. His gave his full, legal name in court as Bobby Beale. anemoneprojectors 18:22, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: To minors? I think we need to start getting strict about ones who have no potential for real world notability. And this character doesnt at the moment.GunGagdinMoan 23:35, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Was thinking the same thing a few days ago. AnemoneProjectors (talk) 00:43, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?

message: OK, do we assume that his appearance was a one-off cameo?  Or do we leave him as "present recurring" in case he makes more appearances?  I guess he would be coming to the end of his sentence soon.  Plus with what EastEnders have planned for Ian and Max over Christmas I guess he could feature as part of that?
I was thinking we could apply the one year rule again for him.--5 albert square (talk) 22:22, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I feel it may be better moving him to past as it seemed to be a one-off cameo. Soaper1234 - talk 10:34, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Return 
Talk:White box (computer hardware)

message: add a paragraph about whitebook?  recent trend in doing white box, but with notebooks.  not commonplace yet.. but might deserve its own article, or at least a mention. 72.174.2.252 22:02, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whitebook 

message: This basically seems to be one paragraph of descriptive text (which could very well be in the PC Compatible article which I got here from) followed by a general diatribe against proprietary software. Half in the mood for proposing this for deletion. Chris Cunningham 18:16, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV in article 

message: I've been using computers a long time and have worked as a software developer and this particular section makes little-to-no sense to me. I'm not saying it's wrong, it's just that if I'm an advanced user and don't understand this, I don't think many people will. What was meant by this? Could it be clarified? Because by my experience, I've never had an issue modifying parts inside my computer, big name or not.
66.240.35.207 01:26, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trouble modding? 

message: White box machines account for 40 percent or so of the U.S. PC market.  Few of those are DIY machines.  Most are large volume runs to spec for corporate clients.  This aspect is largely ignored here.  I changed the lead a bit to improve on this.  Also, a "white box" machine is distinguished by not being marketed under a widely recognized brand name (hence "white" box).  The "made from off the shelf parts" definition doesn't work.  For example, when you buy a Dell, they take standard parts off a shelf and put it together.  Well they used to, anyway.  Cc68 (talk) 05:12, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overemphasis on DIY 

message: Does this article deserve a mention of sleeper homebuilt computers? Maybe it belongs on one of those pages or on beige box, but the practice might be significant enough for a mention on Wikipedia, even if not on its own page. 
MakeUseOf | How-To Geek | PCGamesN | Hypebeast | PC Gamer Zetagaming (talk) 17:28, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sleeper Builds
Wikipedia talk:Files for deletion/2006 May 27

message: I just created this image to help recognize any editor who has made exceptional contributions to Islam-related articles. --JuanMuslim  1m 07:38, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Barnstars are wikipedian, and must not have a religion.  I've nominated this image for deletion.Timothy Usher 07:40, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Barnstars are entirely unofficial, and therefore their form is wholly up to the editors who chose to give them out. I have seen plenty of personal barnstar-type awards which are entirely (and entirely appropriately) POV. — JEREMY 07:56, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Comment: I know individuals like User:Cyde have been making strenous efforts to "neutralize" userboxes and also to subst them (with T2 reasoning). Part of the reason these individuals are doing this is that they want to inhibit the ability of editors to form cabals with such userboxes. I suspect that these same individuals will soon argue for the removal of this type of barnstar when to their way of thinking it is possible to use it for doing the same type of thing. Netscott 08:24, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Partisan awards naturally serve to divide rather than unite, and this barnstar is obviously counter-productive in building bridges among editors with different beliefs. Pecher Talk 09:03, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This barnstar is no different to the many devoted to specific categories. It isn't an award for "being a good Muslim" or even "being a good Muslim editor"; it's "to help recognize any editor who has made exceptional contributions to Islam-related articles". (Note the "any editor" part). Personally, I think barnstars are naff as hell — but I recognise that others find them useful, and it's not like we're talking "This editor thinks Trinitarian Christology is a Surrealist Joke" userboxen or something. — JEREMY 09:29, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You may vote to keep or delete the image at Wikipedia:Images_and_media_for_deletion/2006_May_27. --JuanMuslim  1m 09:33, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I will copy our discussion to Wikipedia talk:Images_and_media_for_deletion/2006_May_27, so that others will get an accurate idea about our current discussion. --JuanMuslim  1m 09:35, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Islamic Barnstar Award
Talk:Stevenson University

message: Is the second word pronounced "Julie" as it looks, or "Julia"?  I've heard both.
:I have always heard it pronounced Julie. --Boothy443 |  trácht ar 06:45, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've heard they've been considering a name change to either "Villa Julie University," or "Stevenson University" after obtaining university status. It is rumored that the school administration wishes to distance itself from the religiously-associated Villa Julie name, however some alumni are not happy that their diplomas would be from a place with a different name, and many others among faculty and the student body do not feel the same need to shed the Villa Julie name. --Korteenea 08:00, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  How to pronounce? 

message: "This reason was cited by the Board of Trustees although data indicates that almost no current students or prospective students were even aware of Villa Julie's former status as a woman's college. "
What data?  There is no source, and no data is cited.  Sounds speculative.
--Kclarke7 (talk) 21:28, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What data? 

message: I added a cleanup tag to this article, since it needs to better follow WP:UNIGUIDE. I can do some of this myself, but I thought to give others a chance to contribute :-). Examples of issues: the story-like content in the history "the university today enrolls...." isn't encyclopedic but sounds like a brochure; the list of majors and programmes is similarly advert-like and not encyclopedic. Cheers! --Aepoutre (talk) 18:48, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup tag 

message: Nearly this whole section reads as a silly advertisement. The cite leads back to the marching band's own self aggrandizing homepage-- What constitutes a "killer" electronics section?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.99.185.50 (talk) 07:23, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marching Band