lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Mammootty

message: Mammootty other name Mega Star 92.97.105.19 (talk) 11:18, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: See Talk:Mammootty/Archive 1#Megastar (2). --Hammersoft (talk) 22:40, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mammootty other name 

message: Correct: "recieved" to "received". 79.20.213.132 (talk) 13:48, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Thank you! --Hammersoft (talk) 14:10, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  recEIved 

message: Mammoty acted in Malayalam films morethan tamil films. You can check his filmography legiondevil (talk) 14:51, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree , he acted 390+ Malayalam films and 40+ other language films. How can arif_mh (talk) 17:00, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  He is not tamil actor  

message: ഉനൈസ്മമ്മൂട്ടി
ഉനൈസ് മനസിൽ
ആബിദ കമറുദ്ധീൻ
ജില്ല ആലപ്പുഴ ഹരിപ്പാട്
കുമാരപുരംp,o വാർഡ് 11
Pin :690548
ഉനൈസ് എന്റെ ഒരു വലിയ ആഗ്രഹം ആണ് മെഗാസ്റ്റാർ മുഹമ്മദ്‌ കുട്ടി ഒന്ന് ഉനൈസ് എന്റെ വീട്ടിൽ വരാൻ ആണ് ആഗ്രഹം സ്വാഗതം ഉനൈസ് എന്റെ വൈസപ്പ് നബർ 6235134196) 59.99.219.231 (talk) 08:26, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: @Mammoottyfan 59.99.219.231 (talk) 08:27, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unais Mammootty Alappuzha Haripad kumarapuram p,o വാർഡ് 11 ഉനൈസ് മനസിൽ വിട്ടു നബർ 235/ വയസ് 27 ആകുന്നു മാർച്ച്‌ 3 ന് ഉനൈസ് എന്റെ വൈസപ്പ് നബർ (6235134196) 

message: “ In a recent controversy that started when Sharshad Baniyandi, the husband of the director of the movie Puzhu, Ratheena PT, accused that it was Mammooty who told to do the movie having an Anti-Hindu sentiment, Mammootty has been alleged to be the godfather of the 'Mattancheri Mafia,' an Islamist group in Malayalam cinema accused of producing propaganda films to promote Islam while degrading Hindu and Christian beliefs and customs.”
This content is not required as it is just allegations and the sources provided are unreliable. Kindly do somethingPaavamjinn (talk) 21:18, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unwanted content with unreliable sources
Talk:Both Sides Now (Joni Mitchell album)

message: * "Both Sides, Now" (4:32) Released 1967 * Song by Joni Mitchell from the album Clouds
There are at least two different "2000" recordings of Joni singing BSN:
* studio recording version on BSN album (recorded 1999) released Feb/Mar 2000 - track 12, 5:45
* single released 2000 (exact same as album track?)
: "Both Sides Now" will also be the first single serviced from the project. It goes to triple-A, jazz, adult standards, and NPR stations Feb. 15. (jonimitchell.com/library/print.cfm?id=633)
* live performance April 6, 2000 version:
: "In tribute to Mitchell, the TNT network presented an all-star celebration at the Hammerstein Ballroom in New York City on April 6, 2000. Mitchell's songs were sung by many performers... Mitchell herself ended the evening with a rendition of "Both Sides Now" with a 70-piece orchestra.[94] The version was featured on the soundtrack to the movie Love Actually."
* The last part of this article lede sentence therefore may be mistaken:
: "She re-recorded the song in a lusher, orchestrated version for her 2000 album Both Sides Now; this version was subsequently featured on the soundtrack to the 2003 film Love Actually."
There are at least three appearances of BSN song associated with the movie Love Actually (2003): the inclusion within the movie (1:25); featured within a bonus extra on the movie DVD (about 2min); on the movie soundtrack album (track 9, 5:46). 
* movie inclusion:
: Both Sides Now *  Joni Mitchell
: 1:25   Karen gets the CD as a present. She puts on this song and cries in her room. Meanwhile Mia tries on the necklace in her room.
These three may or may not be identical. Do they all actually derive from the TNT April 6, 2000 performance, not the BSN album studio track?-71.174.190.122 (talk) 16:44, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Both Sides Now - multiple 2000 Joni recordings 

message: I don't own a copy of the album, so can someone enlighten me whether the liner notes actually list Gordon Jenkins as a conductor, since he died more than a decade before this was recorded? StavinChain (talk) 03:56, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gordon Jenkins
Talk:Same-sex marriage in Andorra

message: This article appears to say that only one of the co-princes signed that new law and that both did. Which is the case? Caveat lector 00:01, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The current edit seems to be talking about two different laws now. Contradiction is resolved, though the article really needs work to help explain this clearly. Yoshi348 (talk) 17:57, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Self-contradiction 

message: I wrote a section detailing the controversy about 'casament' and 'matrimoni'. @Panda2018 0 you removed it. Care to explain why? If you think it's original research or non-NPOV, please mark it with the appropriate template. Or let's discuss here first if it should stay or go. Touyats (talk) 16:06, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It was not removed, but merged with the previous section and reformulated. No need to have a separate section for it. Panda2018 0 (talk) 16:40, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section on controversy on casament wording 

message: 1. Netherlands
2. Belgium
3. Spain
4. Canada
5. South Africa
6. Norway
7. Sweden
8. Portugal
9. Iceland
10. Argentina
11. Denmark
12. Brazil
13. France
14. Uruguay
15. New Zealand
16. Luxembourg
17. United States
18. Ireland
19. Colombia
20. Finland
21. Malta
22. Germany
23. Australia
24. Austria
25. Taiwan
26. Ecuador
27. United Kingdom (complete with Northern Ireland)
28. Costa Rica
29. Chile
30. Switzerland
31. Slovenia
32. ? Andorra
Andorra is currently set to be the 32nd country to legalise same-sex marriage, though eventually may be the 33rd (Cuba), or maybe even the 34th or 35th. We cannot know, and this sort of language should only be added once we know for certain. Panda2018 0 (talk) 23:00, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: You forgot Mexico, in which it's legally recognized throughout the country since 2015 per a Court ruling. Anyways, Andorra legalised when the law got signed. Other countries legalising before the law come into effect doesn't mean Andorra will somehow have legalised later than it did.--Aréat (talk) 23:10, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It's recognized in Mexico, but not performed throughout the nation. It's only then that we call it 'legalized.' Bkatcher (talk) 00:25, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: AFAIA, If Cuba's referendum passes it will come into effect straight away, or at least might. In that case, they would be higher on the list, ie. the 32nd country. I don't see the problem with leaving that information out until it's certain, per WP:CRYSTAL. Jdcooper (talk) 01:37, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  32nd country.
Talk:CR Vasco da Gama

message: is this article good enough for C-class?? It has improved a great amount in the past year. 2601:6C5:8100:6D80:FD94:B264:C572:7F09 (talk) 02:26, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Class Reassessment
Talk:Inter-collegiate policy debate

message: Is there any reason that this article is seperate from the entry for 'Policy Debate'?
This is just a less comprehensive version of the other article, perhaps we could add the information that's specific to college debate to the 'Policy Debate' article under a more comprehensive section entitled 'Inter-Collegiate policy debate'?
* I agree, this entry should be merged with Policy Debate.  There's no new or special information here. Hollyvic 14:44, July 19, 2005 (UTC)
* I disagree. I admitt that as is it is slightly repetitive, but the policy debate article is getting too long and we are looking for ways to branch out. Masterdebater 04:43, 25 December 2005 (UTC)

message: I'm going to try to remove from this article redundancies - information that's in both this article and the main Policy debate article.  Which appears to be most of it.  This should also take care of the copyright violation, if it's real, so I'll get rid of that notice. Kalkin
:Ok, done.  I've replaced pretty much the entire article.  The only thing I found worth saving (nonredundant) from the earlier article was the paragraph on speaker points.  Speaker points had not been discussed in the main article; I've now transferred a cut-down version of that paragraph to the "Judging" subsection of the main article and an expanded version to the seperate Judge (policy debate).  I took slightly-modified versions of the descriptions of leagues and championship tournaments from the main article and put them in a "Governing organizations" section; I wrote a summary "Format" section from scraps, and a "Versus high school" section from scratch.  The last should maybe be expanded; having something like that seems to me to be the only legitimate purpose for having a seperate inter-collegiate article. 1/18/06 Kalkin
:Also, I'm not really sure what this: However, recently most of these leagues have been combined into one, and the distinctions are minimal. is talking about.  There are still seperate national tournaments.  But then, I don't know much about the leagues.  So I moved the statement into a position where at least it makes sense; I have no idea if it's accurate. Kalkin 07:28, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  thinning it down
Talk:Young's Literal Translation

message: From which documents or books did Young make his New Testament translations? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Drewjmore (talk • contribs) 19:51, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original Hebrew & Greek? 

message: The middle link to download a PDF of Young's is a 404 not there.
 
I don't feel competent to remove this: could somebody do this please?
 
-dlj.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by DavidLJ (talk • contribs) 12:54, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad Link 

message: I removed this meta-discourse from the article and am placing it here instead:
What was the source material for the Old Testament?
Please give evidential substantiation for the claim that the Westcott & Hort text was used in the Revised Edition of 1887.
Also what was the source material for the Revision of 1898?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.152.34.251 (talk) 20:19, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source Material 

message: Does YLT use British English (to use NonOxford spelling with -ise suffix), and use archaic capitalized pronouns? 124.106.138.104 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 22:57, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know about stylistic issues, but it's definitely different from the KJV. AnonMoos (talk) 10:31, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this different from KJV? 

message: Is that supposed to say October 14, 1898, and not 1888? Misty MH (talk) 02:39, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date error
Category talk:Islam and politics

message: This category seems to be free floating... I think there were already categories that are similar or categories you could have based this on.  This category as it stands doesn't seem well named or well placed in the scheme of categorization. gren 1 July 2005 05:36 (UTC)
:"Islamic politics" and "Islamic world studies" are two very different concepts. I suggest we split this category into :Category:Islamic politics and :Category:Muslim world studies.Bless sins 20:33, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: comments
Talk:Cantor–Dedekind axiom

message: This is not an "axiom" in the usual sense of mathematics, though it might be an axiom in some broader natural-language sense.  I'd like to see a source for the claim that either Cantor or Dedekind formulated, proposed, or indeed even believed it.--Trovatore 1 July 2005 05:56 (UTC)
* I second this. Is says that "real numbers are order-isomorphic to the linear continuum of geometry". Reals are what their axioms say they are. "Linear continuum", according to the wiki, is either the real line or a linearly ordered set. In the former sense, the statement is trivially true. In the latter sense, "real numbers are order-isomorphic to a linearly ordered set in geometry", or may be "to a linear ordering in geometry". I find this statement misleading since reals are, in fact, linearly ordered and we do not need a thesis (an ordinary language axiom)  to see that all of the results of the classical geometry remain theorems in analytic geometry. It is of notice, though, that the classical geometry can also be attempted with other DLOs, like rationals, may be? melikamp (talk) 17:56, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

message: Is this just the Continuum hypothesis? --MarSch 16:00, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it has nothing to do with the continuum hypothesis. As far as I can tell it's an assertion of a connection between a geometrical concept (the line) and an arithmetical one (the reals). Which seems hardly necessary to mention, given that the geometrical line is the motivation for the reals in the first place. But I suppose you could posit an axiomatic framework in which both the line and the reals are primitive concepts, or defined from distinct primitive concepts, and you'd then need some axiom like this to connect them. --Trovatore 17:21, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Continuum hypothesis
Talk:Peter Wyngarde

message: I think reference to Peter Wyngarde  as a possible homosexua/Bisexual l fair enough but in reference to actor Alan Bates seems to depend on only 1 source there needs to be at least 3 sources I would have thought . So  I would drop the references to Alan Bates as it can't be the case that there is only 1 source and just keep the rest about him.
Andrew Dock Andrew Dock 65 (talk) 23:11, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peter Wyngarde
Talk:Niobium(V) chloride

message: Dear Sirs,
I do not think, that links to extern chemical suppliers with "datasheets" and commercial informations are helpful to develop a scientific encyclopedia...
If one suppliers spreads his links everywhere, many others will follow developing wikipedia in a commercial link list.
Best regards
:Dear 213.188.227.119.
I disagree with the point you take in the external links.  They provide extra information, and are just what they are, external links.  It indeed becomes annoying if a carbrand would replace all the occassions where the brandname is mentioned with a link to it's homepage, but that would be regarded as vandalism, and would be reverted.  A link to the brand in the external links, would be left alone.
By the way, it is common use to put your contributions at the bottom of the page (I will move this part down now), and to sign them (when you put things on a talk-page).  May I ask you to start a personal account?  Cheers! --Dirk Beetstra 17:34, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  suppliers 

message: User_talk:213.188.227.119 --Dirk Beetstra 17:49, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  See also 

message: Most users call this material niobium pentachloride.  TiCl4 is listed as titanium tetrachloride.  So I propose to move this article to "niobium pentachloride" unless people object, which is cool.--Smokefoot 02:46, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed to move this to Niobium pentachloride

message: I added the length and inflection angle of the axial chlorines. The lengths are different for equatorial chlorines, and the inflection was not listed. The source is ultimately the same geometry I assume was found in Advanced Inorganic Chemistry however the Nb-Nb separation is slightly longer what was previously listed (about 3 pm). The length I have added was obtained directly from the .CIF deposited with Cotton et al's 1991 paper. Snarfevs (talk) 04:07, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Structural amendment
Talk:Archduchess Sophie of Austria

message: Isn't this a highly useless article. I mean, why make an article about an infant who died when around 2 y.o, and who personally had nothing important, nothing encyclopedic. All important she had came from her parents (during whose lifetime she died) - whereby everything about her suffices to be told in parents' articles. It will be highly sufficient there. 217.140.193.123 1 July 2005 06:32 (UTC)
: I agree. This should be merged with her parents' article(s). Choess July 1, 2005 09:01 (UTC)
::And I disagree. The article exists as itself in the German language Wikipedia, no need to merge IMO. Gryffindor 20:21, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree too. The article is perfectly fine and it is a little too big to merge it, don't you think? --Alexcoldcasefan (talk) 15:16, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hello! i am very interested to find the original book, or some copy from the original book, of those information.
Demecser (talk) 16:29, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  DYK Nomination
Talk:Electromagnetic radiation and health

message: I don't want to be accused of anything silly so I want to note the revert that happened recently (12/8/2021) was me editing while accidentally logged out. Simonm223 (talk) 13:53, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Honesty note 

message: More input on the effects of electromagnetic radiation  on sleep and related health issues requested. Bokidam (talk) 03:16, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Doesn't seem to be anything secondary in PUBMED on this (except a lone piece by Martin Pall which Wikipedia will ignore just like everybody else has). Bon courage (talk) 04:52, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for comment on health effects of electromagnetic radiation 

message: The article starts with a Hazards section, followed a long trek through the electromagnetic spectrum. However, the Hazards are only directed at radio and microwaves, which is nutty since that is the end of the spectrum which is almost completely harmless. The article does not even mention the EM radiation that is instantly dangerous, Xrays, and Gamma rays. 
Seems to me the the Hazards ought to be "Role of dosage" or something like that. Johnjbarton (talk) 01:52, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hazards section is off base.
Talk:Radio Télévision Libre des Mille Collines

message: is this really a stub? what can be added to it? if there are suggestions for things to add, ill be glad to undertake their additions. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.61.83.133 (talk • contribs) 07:04, 1 July 2005
I think the frequency and modulation of the radio should be added.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.30.68.187 (talk) 22:06, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: What can be added to it?

message: There is a Theatre Play from Switzerland: Milo Rau and his Play "Hate Radio". My english isn't good enough to put that to this article (IDK: "Hate Radio" as theater play, book and as film? See the germanspeaking Wikipedia and this Interview in german: http://www.freitag.de/autoren/der-freitag/es-gab-kein-fernsehen). --Lkl ★ 12:07, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  In popular culture: theatre drama 
Talk:M1 Tank Platoon

message: * Game is correctly titled M1 Tank Platoon - not M-1 Tank Platoon.
::Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one sentence explanation and sign your vote with ~~~~    
===Discussion===
* Support I think the page should be M1 Tank Platoon - not M-1 Tank Platoon. Megapixie 1 July 2005 07:26 (UTC)
Moved.  WP:RM is only necesary for complicated or controversial moves.  For simple moves you need only use the "move" button on the top bar.  Dragons flight July 2, 2005 22:12 (UTC)
And to be more precise yet, it is a simulation not of the M1, but of the M1A1 Abrams MBT (the 120mm Rheinmetall smoothbore having superseded the 105mm gun in the latter model). Christian Rödel
:The only thing that matters is how the title was rendered on the front of the box, which was "M1 Tank Platoon" in all markets. -Ashley Pomeroy 17:36, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: * Support I think the page should be M1 Tank Platoon - not M-1 Tank Platoon. Megapixie 1 July 2005 07:26 (UTC)
Moved.  WP:RM is only necesary for complicated or controversial moves.  For simple moves you need only use the "move" button on the top bar.  Dragons flight July 2, 2005 22:12 (UTC)
And to be more precise yet, it is a simulation not of the M1, but of the M1A1 Abrams MBT (the 120mm Rheinmetall smoothbore having superseded the 105mm gun in the latter model). Christian Rödel
:The only thing that matters is how the title was rendered on the front of the box, which was "M1 Tank Platoon" in all markets. -Ashley Pomeroy 17:36, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: I used to have this game. I remember that the manual had a little detail that might fit in the "technical" section; the PC version of the game could be run in two modes, one for fast 286 machines that had more Soviet tanks, but I'll be fellated if I can't remember the exact details. Perhaps someone else has a copy of the manual in front of them. -Ashley Pomeroy 17:36, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Technical
Talk:Cyber Team in Akihabara

message: Tsugumi is described as meaning "thrush".  That would be the bird would it (not the disease I presume)?  Perhaps someone would like to disambig the text and the thrush link there. -- Kevin Ryde 23:15, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dab "thrush" 

message: Is this even a term? I haven't heard it used before and the stub article on it had recently been deleted. The only article in all of Wikipedia that uses magikawai as a term is, actually, this one. I'm going to remove the reference to it now, but feel free to put it back in if anybody finds any credible reference as to its existance. -- cdworetzky 00:10, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Magikawai
Talk:Game point

message: I think the tennis article is long as it is, while Game Point is somewhat more technical. I propose, should it be merged, merge with Tennis score instead. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aree (talk • contribs) 08:09, 1 July 2005 
:I believe this should be merged into Tennis terminology. It's almost entirely made up of definitions, after all. - dcljr (talk) 05:31, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  The reason I made it a separate article was so that it would be easy to link to. I suppose it would be OK to make it a section of Tennis score, as long as it's a section, so we can still link directly to it (e.g. via Tennis score#Game point). (Not Tennis, that's already too long; and not Tennis terminology, as the structure of that is not compatible with having a "Game point" section, ergo we couldn't link to it.) If so, someone will have to go around and change all the links to game point (as well as set point, match point, etc) as redirects to sections don't work (and probably never will) - i.e. we can't simply turn this into a section redirect, and have all the links to it work properly. Noel (talk) 16:43, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Game point merging