lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:MPLS VPN

message: Ok i just wrote this up because i noticed there was no page... i work with MPLS-VPNs everyday and there is probablly a lot more info i can put into the page...
Specifically i havent said much about route-refecltors and iBGP (and eBGP with multiple private AS merging multiple MPLS-VPNs) use in practicle MPLS-VPN deployments.. also i havent linked many key works to other wikipedia articles. I could get down to the nitty gritty Cisco commands used in MPLS-VPNS too but i think wikipedia might want to remain non-vendor specific?
hhhh
Still i guess its better than NO MPLS-VPN page, feel free to make your changes :). My grammer and sentence structure, along with spelling was never one of my strong points :). 
For those interested, I work for Comindico, who i believe were one of the very first (if not the first?) to deploy a national (in Australia) MPLS network that was designed from day one to be MPLS. The network is 100% MPLS, and covers 98% (maybe more?) of Australia.
: I fixed up your spelling in a few places, expanded on some acronymns and sorted out the internal links a bit. I don't really understand the subject material so I don't have any opinion on how to expand the article, but it's a good start! Davelong 09:39, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)

message: There are claims about the superiority of MPLS VPNs over IPSec, etc.  These claims may be true or may have been true at the time the article was written.  As technology evolves quickly, it's quite possible that any supposed advantages have been obviated by new inventions unknown to the author in 2005.    Unfortunately, there's no explanation of why these claims might be true, just what feels to me like"marketing" hype.  Again, I'm not disputing, I'm just saying that the information provided does not support some of the claimed advantages.  BAlfson (talk) 12:48, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality (February 2009) 

message: Can u elaborate a bit on how MPLS VPN works or how it achieves a virtually private network ??
i hav a bit of work exp on ths tech so need more help 
Saurabhdkadam (talk) 17:47, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: That is generally a good request for improving the article. Please note though that Wikipedia is not a forum for anyone to seek help with IT-related or other problems so you shouldn't expect any quick answer. And Wikipedia is not a reliable source either. De728631 (talk) 17:52, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Need Info 

message: == Worthless ==
This article is totally pointless. There is absolutely no description, but a zillion buzzwords. I understand that Cisco is pushing this stuff but there is no "why" anywhere. If an article can't be better than this, it should be deleted, in my opinion.210.22.142.82 (talk) 04:23, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: ==

message: This article is totally pointless. There is absolutely no description, but a zillion buzzwords. I understand that Cisco is pushing this stuff but there is no "why" anywhere. If an article can't be better than this, it should be deleted, in my opinion.210.22.142.82 (talk) 04:23, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Worthless
Talk:Limburgish

message: Not only I have made this talke page difficult to. What can I do to render its content better? Sarcelles (talk) 07:58, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added  to the section above, and tagged the page so that older sections will be archived by a bot. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:39, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The reflist makes a better legibility. However, the content still doesn't follow the rules. How can I change this? Sarcelles (talk) 07:58, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: You don't actually say which are the problem sections. But what I do see is a lot of  pairs plus excessive indenting. These seem to have begun around July 2023. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 11:15, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

text: You removed the automated archiving code, with an edits summary "Automatic archiving removed, the disputes are not resolved"; this seems to be based on a misunderstanding, as live will not be archived. I have restored the code. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:47, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: This talk page currently has not a single resolved section as far as I know. Furthermore, it is difficult to read its content, which is even not formatted properly. Sarcelles (talk) 13:53, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legibility of this talk page
Talk:SS Commissaire Ramel

message: Preserved as written for wiki historical purposes.
:Commissaire Ramel was a French passenger ship. Loaded with general cargo and wool, it left Fremantle, Western Australia between 1 and 3 September 1939. It was sunk 9 September 1940 by the German raider Atlantis. Three men died in fires.
:Bruce Logan, a survivor of the Ramel, noted there was a German sailor on board the Free-French ship Ramel who had helped to guide the Atlantis to the Ramel. The German had torches and lights to signal to the Atlantis in the night. He was gone well before the first shells hit the Ramel.
:This is what Bruce Logan said about when he boarded the Commissaire Ramel:
:"...I remember hearing a piano so I eventually found the man playing the piano, he faced me, he said are you the new one on the ship? He said get off now, get off, this ship will not reach England, I’m telling you now it will never reach London, take off now, obviously I didn’t take his advise...”
:I'm not sure if the man on the piano was the German or someone else.
:Anyway, the survivors were loaded onto Durmitor, and some died in hard, hot conditions''
70.57.139.181 08:18, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old text
Talk:Scott Stadium

message: Citation 6 dead link, remove. Notadamkhan (talk) 02:15, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed, data exists here. Though it could use an update, it only goes up to 2012. Rusalkii (talk) 02:42, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like they haven't had over 60,000 since 2013, so the records stand. Rusalkii (talk) 02:45, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 1 December 2021
Talk:Merton College, Oxford

message: Would we like a map of the buildings on the main page?  
All my own work, but derived from the (less accurate) plan given in Highfield's "History of Merton College"
Thruston (talk) 16:23, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Thruston, thank you for adding the map, could you get the caption to display in the article? Also the in map text is rather small even on a laptop, but obviously the space for text is limited. TSventon (talk) 13:19, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.  The image syntax is a bit baffling at times.   It now has a frame and it a bit bigger. Thruston (talk) 22:22, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A plan for the buildings section?
Talk:Griffith, New South Wales

message: Griffith is not growing as fast as some suggest. According to the Bureau of Statistics, Griffith's population grew by 0.9% between 2000 and 2005. Download the document here for proof. --One Salient Oversight 02:48, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population growth issues 
Talk:Blenheim Reef

message: With regard to your specific points, the rule in English is normally to use words up to ninety-nine, numbers thereafter.  I expanded the abbreviations because they're easier to read, and in a popular encyclopædia rather than a scientific text I think that they're preferable; different Wikipedia editors have different views, so you'll see variations across articles.  There was a discussion concerning abbreviations recently, and using the full form was suggested especially as a way of avoiding confusing differences between abbreviation styles (like 'sq. km' vs 'km²') and between systems (such as 'm.' for 'mile' and 'metre').
The issue about American vs British spelling (and it's actually much more complex than that, with Canadian, South African, Australian, New Zealand, etc, all with variants) has been debated endlessly.  the current Wikipedia style is that articles can be written in any form, the first person to make a choice being followed by later editors, but that any article that relates to a person, place, etc., with roots in one or another Englsh style, can be rewritten.  Here, as I wa the first person to make the choice, I automatically wrote in the English known to me.  (It's not possible to write in another form of English, in my opinion; however well one thinks that one knows the diferences, one will make mistakes.  Also, many people take their idiolect to be standard.)
The business about stubs is one about which I know little.  I think that one school of thought is that any article that can't be expanded beyond stub size shouldn't be a separate article, but should be incorporated into a larger article.  I don't go along with that myself, but I assume that any article can be expanded furhter, and the 'stub' template is a good way to draw other editors' attention.
For many of your questions, see the Wikipedia:Manual of style (and Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style).
I'll place this on the Talk page of Blenheim Reef]] too. Mel Etitis  (Μελ Ετητης) 09:20, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Reply to Ratzer

message: In Portuguese it would be Baixo, and not Baxio.
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Baxio_Predassa"
:Well, like I've stated before, there must have been a mistake in naming, because the official name for the atoll is BAXIO Predassa. Maybe it's a wrong translation, but THAT IS HOW IT IS --Maurice45 (talk) 14:43, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong Portuguese Term

message: Inserted image (present in wikimedia.commons)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.81.86.217 (talk) 13:48, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Updated page
Talk:Sashimono

message: So, um, the Japanese page this links to is about woodworking. If I look up the first set of kanji in a dictionary it says it means "cabinetmaking" and the Japanese Wikipedia page refers to cabinetmaking (oddly enough, Apple's builtin Japanese dictionary based on the Daijisen does contain 指物 in the sense of battle flag, noting it only came into use with the Sengoku era, along with the cabinetmaking definition). 
Japanese wikipedia, by contrast, refers to this style of flag as 幟 (nobori), for which a wikipedia page already exists. I want to suggest that the contents of this article be merged into that of Nobori, with a stub for the style of cabinetmaking and a note directing people curious about the flag to Nobori. I don't know enough about wikipedia administration to do it myself.
For what it's worth, scholarship in English predominantly uses sashimono with respect to woodworking, with most references to battle flags due to the considerable volume of scholarship by Turnbull.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.247.26.66 (talk) 23:47, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  指し物 = Cabinetmaking? 

message: I propose a merge based off of this comment https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Sashimono#%E6%8C%87%E3%81%97%E7%89%A9_=_Cabinetmaking? Space772 (talk) 03:27, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I am not an expert on this subject, but I don't think the examples shown at Sashimono are actually Nobori. As the name nobori implies, they have to be long and thin. Another option (if we take for granted that all of these subjects are inherently "Japanese") would be to use Umajirushi for the material currently at Sashimono (cf. :ja:馬印). However, it's also possible just to make a hatnote on the current Sashimono article if there is another article this is actually in conflict with. The word sashimono itself has both meanings. Dekimasuよ! 03:54, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge
Talk:Geography of Romania

message: —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.185.163.1 (talk) 15:50, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

message: * different forms are used "foo river", "foo River", "foo (river)"
* Regards Gangleri | [ Th] | T 10:34, 2005 Mar 29 (UTC)
*now only "foo River" and "foo" Tobias Conradi (Talk) 09:51, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  titles for [[:Category:Rivers of Romania]] 

message: I think that it is very important to use the same forme at all countries and conties. In Ro Wikipedia all romanian counties are foo (conty) and I have this opinion for use too.
It is certain that will be need of deambiguation pages on some tiles like Timiş which will send the visitor to: city of Timisoara, Timis county, Timis river, another Timis river (culoarul Timis-Cerna), etc...
-Romihaitza 20:43, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: In Romanian wiki the counties are like this: Judeţul Alba, not Alba (judeţ). Maybe we should create a name policy for the whole English wikipedia. (unless it already exists). IMO, the best would be the "Alba County", instead of "Alba (county)". Bogdan | Talk 08:37, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opinion 

message: Romania has 3,195 kilometres (1,985 mi) of border.
There is also 3149.9 km and this is OK probably. 91.219.132.21 (talk) 08:41, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Probably mistake
Talk:Football (disambiguation)

message: On 1 April 2005, this article was nominated for deletion. The result was redirect to Football. See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Football (disambiguation) for a record of the discussion. – ABCD 01:46, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: VFD

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Football which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 23:45, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: why do soccer fans have to be so prissy about not wanting to call their game soccer? A majority of the English speaking world refers to this game as soccer, not as football. It does not matter what they call it in France and Germany and Brazil etc. Those are not English speaking countries. In the English speaking world, the majority calls the game soccer. American football fans don't try to "own" the word and disavow other ways of referring to the game. Soccer is a perfectly acceptable word, and frankly, NOBODY calls the game Association Football. Wikipedia should not be used for POV. 68.174.97.122 (talk) 04:29, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I suggest you read the following: names for association football, WP:ENGVAR, and especially WP:RETAIN.  Still, I agree that the word soccer could be used here to help North American English speakers identify the "football" they may be seeking. Hoof Hearted (talk) 20:17, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  this page should mention soccer
Talk:VARA (radio and TV)

message: This is a start towards adding more information on the Dutch public broadcasting system and its organization. There is a need for a future article on verzuiling. -- Picapica 10:41, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)

message: I had already written the article-stub VARA (tv) when I discovered that this one already existed. I moved this text to there, although I now realise I should have asked here first. Hope there are no serious objections. My title is less accurate, but shorter. 
An article on verzuiling exists now, by the way. DirkvdM 12:35, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Move
Talk:Pomfret

message: Would pomfret go under the name Mullet in the western world ( ie England & Ireland)
No, mullet is a different fish entirely. From what I've heard, though, pomfret is also sometimes known as pompano. Jcb9
is pomfret & golden pompano the same fish ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.20.220.45 (talk) 17:20, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
Talk:Fidenza

message: 25 million inhabitants, and yet its a *small* town.  And its also a village apparently.  Riiiight. --Kross 12:17, Mar 29, 2005 (UTC)
Local historians agree that the 'Rocca' was oonot destroyed during the bombing, but had just minor damages (like the walls around the court). Americans didn't want to hit the symbols of the city therefore preserved the Cathedral, the theater, some churches and some palaces: the Rocca should have been on the list. The municipality decided to tear down the Rocca and different rumors on the real reason are reported.  --BDavide (talk) 12:05, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

message: Iufsbnhprotibh[erjubvjefvprtiugjrtg98trgijrtibn[tnur 90.90.187.118 (talk) 21:31, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rjgutgjtug
Talk:Realm of Sweden

message: It would be really nice to see a map of the Realm of Sweden at its largest to better comprehend its vastness. - Quirk 13:15, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't help questining the merit of this article. Even in Swedish, the term is at best extremely vague and hardly specific to anything except maybe historic aspects of Sweden that are specific to the rule of monarchs. It simply smacks of very old historical perceptions of history that aren't valid in Swedish, and certainly not for direct translation into an English article. Peter Isotalo 12:23, May 1, 2005 (UTC)
"Researchers from the 19th century have suggested that in the 9th century Svealand, which they claimed was the historical core region of Sweden, expanded southwards, conquering Gothia. Little is known however from this time and more contemporary researchers have suggested that Gothia might as well have been the core region, or the two region were joined through a union."
The recorded kings the first 400 years where all from either Västergötland or Östergötland and they divided the kingdom into the administrative unit of härad from Götaland and not hundare from Uppland. So Svealand probably conqured Götaland or ... the truth may be that Svealand didn't exist, it was just a name for the combined tribes of Sweden, Swedes. So the Göta where also Svea. Arneke (talk) 09:42, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Forsythia

message: I hope :Image:Tree dsc00856.jpg is really a forsythia. David.Monniaux 13:27, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo

message: Are the blossoms used as well as the fruits?  When the fruits are used, are they crushed first or simply boiled whole?  Badagnani 12:30, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use in [[traditional Chinese medicine]] 

message: It would be nice to have pictures and discussion to distinguish forsythia from dogwood. Yes, I know this is incredibly ingnorant, but at this time of the year, I am realizing that the confusion is really common. Will post the same at dogwood. DavidOaks (talk) 00:56, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  pictures, discussion 

message: Is this worth mentioning? It'll be easy to reference from reviews of the movie. 125.253.96.175 (talk) 11:54, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It can probably be added under a Popular Culture heading or something like that. Nostep (talk) 03:59, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I went ahead and added it. Nostep (talk) 04:54, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Aaaand those Zealous "editors" strike pretty quick.. Nostep (talk) 05:21, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Forsythia as the fictional bogus cure to the disease in the Contagion movie? 
Talk:RB-79 Ball

message: Somebody who knows more about the universe should add the "fictional disclaimer" at the top. --GaidinBDJ 13:55, Mar 29, 2005 (UTC)
Very heavy edit. Rearranged article to match other MS pages, merged redundant sections, edited for consistent tense, spelling, and grammar, added video game and MS Igloo information. Schottenjaeger 05:34, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  First header
Talk:Quinoa

message: A paragraph in the section on the etymology of the English word concerns the grammatical gender of the word in French, which seems to have been translated (with a number of grammatical errors) from the French page. Should this paragraph be deleted (rather than corrected) since it is of very little relevant to the English page? Loris Bennett (talk) 15:57, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: , I've removed it. No reason for English Wikipedia to go into detail about a word in French. Plantdrew (talk) 16:57, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @Plantdrew OK, thanks! Loris Bennett (talk) 21:14, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion of paragraph about grammatical gender of the French word?
Talk:Ogoki River

message: The Welland River drains in to the Niagara...  Geo Swan 14:19, 2005 Mar 29 (UTC)
:I suppose this could have meant the Niagara Falls generators (which do indeed use Welland River's channel for a bit, although that's being phased out in favour of tunnels). While I am not sure how much of an impact a single river will make when compared to the drain of four Great Lakes, I'll leave it in for now and just clarify where the electricity is generated. --Qviri 22:26, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Welland River]] ?
Talk:Three Crowns

message: "Coat of Arms of the of Sweden" - should there be a "Kingdom" in there somewhere?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nasorenga (talk • contribs) 15:00, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Intro

message: I just rewrote much of the article.  Adding sources to the article will hopefully make it more useful.  There is now a section in the article which probably could easily be scrapped entirely if provided with some additional sources for the various pieces of information in it.
 / Mats Halldin (talk) 15:23, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New version March 2007 

message: According to this site regarding heraldic charges  (http://heralds.westkingdom.org/Templates/OtherCharges/index2.htm)
A crown is a circlet of metal, often jewelled, worn on the head of a monarch as an emblem of sovereignty. As an heraldic charge, it was first seen in the attributed arms of St. Edmund the Martyr, c. 1282.
Anyone know more? TheSmokinGun 07:08, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  St Edmund's Crown 

message: Another unsourced hypothesis; Magnus Ladulås used three crowns on his seal. --Tokle (talk) 13:57, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Magnus Ladulås 

message: "This paragraph actually explains nothing. The meaning of the three crowns remains a mystery here."
I moved this comment here from the "The three crowns" section of the content page as it seems to be more of a discussion comment. I agree that the paragraph does not say why Magnus Eriksson used the three crowns.
But this explanation follows in the following paragraph. Is this unclear? Should the article be edited to make it easier to understand? --Thathánka Íyotake (talk) 01:43, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment
Talk:Hull down

message: :The polar opponent of the Soviet tanks was the defensively-designed Swedish Stridsvagn 103. While it resembled a tank destroyer, it was actually a tracked tank-turret serving the role of a tank. This turretless vehicle was designed to nearly disappear in a hull-down position.
What the hell is a tracked tank-turret? This does not distinguish it from any turretless tank destroyer. If there is a distinction, this is not it. We need a better wording of this. And the article for this AFV doesn't provide any valid distinction either as of now. D. F. Schmidt (talk) 21:19, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  tracked tank-turret? 

message: The naval and land concepts are marginally related. fgnievinski (talk) 23:44, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Is there really enough content for it to be split across two articles? I don't think so. (Hohum @) 14:50, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split apart 

message: The lower part of a ship's hull is constantly under water and therefore not visible, exept in the case the ship is an a dry dock. This article is about the part of the ship's hull above the waterline that is obscured by the curved surface of the sea due to the curvature of the earth. Sciencia58 (talk) 04:26, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Visibility