lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Foster's rule

message: The correct term for this is the island rule, not Foster's Rule, at least if current research journals are to be believed () . This page should be moved to reflect that. Sabine's Sunbird  talk 21:48, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Can't really judge, but it does seem the rule is much older than Foster: Franz Nopcsa von Felső-Szilvás#Contributions to paleobiology and geology. This should be mentioned in the article. --Florian Blaschke (talk) 05:50, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggested move
Talk:Bartholomew of Braga

message: Is "Bartolomew of Braga" a misspelling? Shouldn't it be "Bartholomew of Braga"? Why is the page for "Bartholomew of Braga" (the correct spelling) a redirect to this misspelled page? I'll move this if no one responds in the next few days. Alekjds talk 17:17, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm moving it. Compare Google searches for "Bartholomew of Braga" and "Bartolomew of Braga"; the former only brings up Wikipedia and mirrors; the latter brings up relevant resources. Alekjds talk 23:53, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Especially when you omit WP:  "Bartolomew of Braga" -wikipedia, 3 hits, one admittedly a typo; "Bartholomew of Braga" -wikipedia, 56 hits, incl Catholic Encycl, Catholic- Library, and the article with the aforementioned typo, Support the move, in other wds --SigPig |SEND - OVER 21:56, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Currently in the suggested moves section. Votes are of course appreciated, though I think it's a pretty straightforward case. Alekjds talk 23:34, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Take nothing for granted on these pages, my friend. Good thing Bartholomew of Braga is not a Super 14 rugby player... --SigPig |SEND - OVER 06:27, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Thanks! Alekjds talk 03:15, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:Send Away the Tigers

message: Is that taken near where Richey went missing?  AJUK </font>Talk!! 17:59, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo 

message: There is currently a discrepancy in the ranking of the singles between the infobox and the Background section.
The Background section says "Your Love Alone Is Not Enough" is the first single from the album but the infobox says it is the second single.  The article for the song also says it is the second single from the album.
Verifying the release dates is tricky.  The band's official site only gives the year of release for these singles.  User-supplied dates at two common sites (that I won't mention to avoid this comment being tagged "use of deprecated (unreliable) source") do actually agree with the ranking but have a slightly different release date for the "Your Love Alone Is Not Enough" single (specifically 30 April 2007 instead of 23 April 2007 given in the infobox).
For what it's worth, a video of Manic Street Preachers and Nina Persson performing "Your Love Alone Is Not Enough" on BBC Channel 4 in 2007, currently available on Persson's channel at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iVC8GbQeZIw, says at about 3:27 that the single will be released on April 30 but, as this statement was made in advance of the single release, that date may not have turned out to be correct.
All that said, the ranking in the infobox appears to be correct so the text in the Background section is likely incorrect.  I will correct it.
If anyone can clarify the release date for "Your Love Alone Is Not Enough", that would be nice.  If the current date of 23 April 2007 turns out the be incorrect, please note that the article for the song also uses that date.
Wantnot (talk) 12:09, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Single release dates and ranking
Template talk:The Naked Brothers Band

message: There are so many unecessary articles! An article for each song is not necessary especcialy when there is no information provided on them!--Jeffhardywhyx 21:54, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Exactly, An article should'nt have to be made for every song that comes out for the show. QuasyBoy 24:20, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

text: I'll fix that, but the most involved editor is on a steep learning curve, so I hope it sticks.  SandyGeorgia (Talk) 02:10, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

message: :On the left hand side of the template -- Crew, Cast. Would any one know how to keep the same color and font of the template but to be able to move it to the top center.e.g. Crew
Polly Draper (Creator/Executive Producer/Writer/Director) Michael Wolff (Co-Executive Producer/Music Supervisor/Music Producer) Tim Draper (Consulting Producer) Michael A. Levine (Music Producer) Melanie Mayron (Director) Magda Liolis (Writer)
Thanx! AnnieTigerChucky (talk) 13:07, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: ATC, I'm not understanding the question?  Also, that blue is very dark and hard to read.  SandyGeorgia (Talk) 17:13, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  On the left hand side of the template
Talk:Galaxy Invader

message: Redlettermedia (Mike Stoklasa) also made 2 funny spoof commercials, in which he mixed real Pabst Blue Ribbon (beer) commercials with clips from "Galaxy Invader". They are available on Youtube. Not sure if I can post the links here? 79.210.177.143 (talk) 09:51, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pabst Blue Ribbon spoof commercials 

message: This movie was not riffed as part of Cinematic Titanic.  The article that it links to lists another movie by the same director/writer/producer and mentions Galaxy Invader as a reference to him, not as a feature that they riffed.
"Disc Five begins with a live riffing of The Alien Factor, a 1976 sci-fi creature feature from schlock extraordinaire Don Dohler (The Galaxy Invader)"
I don't edit Wikipedia so I'm hoping if I put this here someone will see it and make whatever corrections need to be made 184.57.232.177 (talk) 19:03, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a Cinematic Titanic film
Talk:Icon editor

message: How about if we merge in the contents of the short articles RealWorld Icon Editor, Axialis IconWorkshop, and @icon sushi? Each of these articles could be made into a section of this article. And if one day these articles are expanded a lot, then they can be given their a separate article again. —Remember the dot (t) 22:00, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge (software articles)

message: Not only is this article short, but it lacks notability and thus may be deleted. Instead I propose be merged as a subsection of the parent article Computer icon also adding more weight to a sparse article. Please now agree or oppose, your feedback is welcomed. --Hm2k (talk) 13:09, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose. If specific icon editors have their own articles, there should be an article for the entire category —Ippopotamus (talk) 22:40, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That's null logic, since none of the icon editors articles have notability and may be nominated for deletion, much like this article, unless it is merged. --Hm2k (talk) 08:31, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

text: I support a merge. Some guy (talk) 20:59, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Scouting/Userboxes

message: Are there any userboxes for users that used to be in the Cub Scouts?  Allen (talk) 22:27, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I made one just a few days before seeing this post, and another contributor improved the graphics. It has display options to show the year earned and to change the text to "Webelos Award" if earned before 1968. See . Yours in Scouting, Taxman1913 (talk) 09:27, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cub Scouts
Wikipedia talk:Deletion review/Log/2007 February 15

message: *Relist/Overturn The main source of DELETEs for this article seem to be one dogged user with an agenda and those incensed by the sockpuppetry.  Very little discussion of the merits of the AfD actually occurred once the sockpuppets showed up.  This is not a case of a Frindle or similar nonsense; it is a well-recognized comic.  IMHO, the page should be de-salted and then relisted, so as to allow any necessary notability references to be added and then critiqued.  This change was far too sudden and, seemingly, far too unilateral. Jouster 21:55, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment on "The noob" review posted after discussion was closed
Talk:Cuerdley

message: #The stub needs to be massively expanded using Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements as a guide.
#It should make use of sections, using Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements as a guide.
#Infobox to be added (use Template:Infobox UK place.)
#Photos need to be added.
#References and Citations are crucial for wikipedia, and so these must be added as the article is expanded. Make sure that as many as possible are "in-line" citations.(See WP:References, WP:V, and WP:CITE for guidance.) 
Peter I. Vardy 13:37, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment Report 
Talk:Poulton-with-Fearnhead

message: #Article needs to be massively expanded using Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements as a guide.
#It should make use of sections, using Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements as a guide.
#Infobox to be added (use Template:Infobox UK place.)
#Photos need to be added.
#References and Citations are crucial for wikipedia, and so these must be added as the article is expanded. Make sure that as many as possible are "in-line" citations.(See WP:References, WP:V, and WP:CITE for guidance.)
Peter I. Vardy 10:37, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment Report
Talk:Rixton-with-Glazebrook

message: #The article needs to be massively expanded using Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements as a guide.
#It should make use of sections, using Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements as a guide.
#Infobox to be added (use Template:Infobox UK place.)
#Photos need to be added.
#References and Citations are crucial for wikipedia, and so these must be added as the article is expanded. Make sure that as many as possible are "in-line" citations.(See WP:References, WP:V, and WP:CITE for guidance.)
Peter I. Vardy 14:14, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment Report
Talk:Michael Morgan (rower)

message: Michael Morgan is also an orchestral conductor in the USA.  Perhaps someone should create this entry and split the original entry?  --Gglockner 22:15, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Stretton, Warrington

message: #Article needs to be massively expanded using Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements as a guide.
#It should make use of sections, using Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements as a guide.
#Photos need to be added.
#References and Citations are crucial for wikipedia, and so these must be added as the article is expanded. Make sure that as many as possible are "in-line" citations.(See WP:References, WP:V, and WP:CITE for guidance.)
Peter I. Vardy 11:07, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment Report 

message: Stretton, Warrington has the co-ordinates 53.3381N 2.5775W.
Stretton, Cheshire West and Chester has the co-ordinates 53.3422N  2.5736W.
I compared them by location on Google Earth and found they are not very far apart. The surrounding villages are all the same.
There is another Stretton in Cheshire which should really be Stretton, Cheshire West and Chester. It is located near the town of Malpas and has the co-ordinates 53.0689N 2.8244W. 
In 1870-72, John Marius Wilson's Imperial Gazetteer of England and Wales described Stretton like this:
:"STRETTON, a township in Tilston parish, Cheshire; 4¼ miles N W of Malpas. Acres, 900. Real property, £1,278. Pop., 94. Houses, 18."
Regards, --Oldontarian (talk) 20:29, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stretton--northern Cheshire or southern Cheshire? 

message: This article is the same as this on svwp. I do not know how to merge them on wikidata. Help, someone. On svwp there are sources that could be included here too. Adville (talk) 13:24, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help on Wikidata
Talk:Yufka

message: Has anyone seen Macedonian jufki? I tried so hard, but I really really can't describe 'em. They're in a worm-like form and they're made of a similar dough also called jufki, but I'm not able to give the proper explanation. If anyone's seen them, please help me include it in the article, or maybe I can take a picture of a dish of jufki and show you, so you can describe it :D BTW, it's written (singular) јуфка and (plural) јуфки and pronounced yufka, yufki. INkubusse 18:30, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Macedonian ''jufki''

message: In Bulgaria, yufka is a kind of pasta, often eaten for breakfast, with butter and cheese and often herbal tea and/or honey or sugar. Exactly like on the second picture. It's also used as an ingredient in a lot of dishes, especially baked ones. 82.137.72.33 (talk) 12:32, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bulgarian yufka 
Talk:Winwick, Cheshire

message: #The article needs to be massively expanded using Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements as a guide.
#It should make use of sections, using Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements as a guide.
#Infobox to be added (use Template:Infobox UK place.)
#Photos need to be added.
#References and Citations are crucial for wikipedia, and so these must be added as the article is expanded. Make sure that as many as possible are "in-line" citations.(See WP:References, WP:V, and WP:CITE for guidance.)
Peter I. Vardy 14:19, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment unpacked
Talk:Citadel of Lille

message: Just the Beginning, Fascinating Structure, and a great Example of Fortification architecture. Stabilo boss 22:16, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Start
Talk:List of people on the postage stamps of the Canadian provinces

message: Those listed are not people on stamps of the Canadian provinces, but on stamps of separate colonies and of the independent Dominion of Newfoundland. Newfoundland needs its own article, but the title for what is left over is more problematical. Moonraker (talk) 21:08, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Different page name needed
Talk:Vern Fonk

message: * The article on HeraldNet is the same exact article as on the Seattle P-I, only edited. I am removing it just 'cause there was this strange sense of Deja vu. Here's the link in case someone objects. http://www.heraldnet.com/stories/06/08/14/100bus_vern001.cfm - 66.109.195.81 22:18, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Canada 2c Large Queen on laid paper

message: This article states that "The 2¢ Large Queen on laid paper is the rarest postage stamp of Canada." The article on the Canada 12d black states "Canada 12d black or The Black Empress of Canada is the rarest Canadian postage stamp". It seems like both articles claim that there respective stamp is the rarest. I suggest we add a edit request and have someone find out which one is actually the rarest. I will be crossposting on the 12d article and adding a citation needed  — Preceding unsigned comment added by MaxGame5o (talk • contribs) 01:27, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflicting info with the Canada 12d black
Talk:CIA invert

message: This is an automated message regarding an image used on this page. The image :File:1610c.jpg, found on :CIA invert, has been nominated for deletion because it does not meet Wikipedia image policy. Please see the image description page for more details. If this message was sent in error (that is, the image is not up for deletion, or was left on the wrong talk page), please contact this bot's operator.  STBotI (talk) 15:16, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: An image on this page may be deleted
Talk:Collectors Club of New York

message: Both of these articles, Collectors Club of New York and the Lichtenstein Medal, are rather short, in fact little more than stubs, so I suggest merging them. The two topics are so closely interrelated they would be better combined into one more comprehensive article. Besides which he medal is awarded by the club, so should be in an article about the club itself with the medal becoming a redirect. ww2censor (talk) 21:51, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I do not feel the two pages should be merged. If that were done, then it would look like the only function of the club was the Lichtenstein Medal, which is not the case. The medal is only one minor part of the club's operations. Actually, the page for the Collectors Club should be expanded since the club provides many services and functions that are not listed or spelled out on the page. Also the history of the club should be expanded as it is one of the oldest and most prestigious and historic clubs of its kind and that deserves to be spelled out in some detail. Members of this club, in most cases, are world famous people with world famous collections, and that is only shown by a list which should be converted to descriptive text. Also not included in the page is their participation in major philatelic exhibitions, and that needs to be detailed. When I have the opportunity to study the Collectors Club, I'll see if I can reorganized and expand the page from what it is now.Wikited (talk) 21:52, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggested merge
Talk:Dag Hammarskjöld invert

message: What's a discovery sheet?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.16.79.117 (talk) 10:57, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The first sheet of stamps, with this error, to be discovered !! ww2censor (talk) 13:38, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm, none of our articles seem to mention the term?  Not sure which is most appropriate. Stan (talk) 15:34, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Amongst postal history collectors we use the term "discovery copy" to indicate the first recorded item of whatever. ww2censor (talk) 21:48, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: You know that and I know that, but where does a WP reader find that out? Stan (talk) 23:31, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Question
Talk:Marvin Sapp

message: How can he be 23 (Dec 6, 1987)? In the article, it stated that he decided to establish himself as a contemporary gospel artist in 1991. What 4 year old does that? I dont know how old he is but anyone can tell that he's much older. 33.....Maybe  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.199.24.149 (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  23?
Talk:Robson Lowe

message: Could someone please give me a source for "His philatelic publishing was prolific", because I think it is just vandalism. How many times do you come up with alliteration and a toungue twister in an encyclopedia? --Obaidz96 (talk) 01:11, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Try this this and this. ww2censor (talk) 01:20, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alliteration 

message: Robson Lowe ran a very successful auction. I knew someone who worked for him as a describer in his later years. I think his company was bought by Philips, in turn bought by Bonhams, though I'm not entirely sure about that. Apparently he was very keen on limericks and verses. Bigger.Simon (talk) 20:36, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Robson Lowe - Stamp Auctioneer

message: Earlier today I reverted Maidonian's removal of the stub templates and now reassessed the article as a start-class. Re-adding the stubs was done before any expansion took place which happened later; at the time there were only a couple of short paragraphs of prose which rated the article as only a stub at best and could only marginally have been classified as a start-class article if pushed. Despite there being a large bibliography does not add to the fact that the prose was so short but it is better now. The three deleted named philatelists were also reverted, even after expansion, because each of these there contains specific references to Robson Lowe that will likely never be found by readers just clicking on the List of philatelists, so I have reinstated those see also links. Additionally I have converted the inline citations to use citation templates as is recommended because the templates allows better information to be added with proper style and format. The article still needs additional work with verifiable reliable sources and more references. ww2censor (talk) 03:42, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion

message: There is a piece on this talk page that may provide additional leads on Lowe's life: User talk:166.129.11.203 Philafrenzy (talk) 23:47, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Biography
Talk:Thomas Jefferson Hogg

message: Is it a fair assumption that he was a namesake of U.S. President, Thomas Jefferson, or is this simply a coincidence? Dr. Dan 22:22, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: Hope there's no problem with me relisting it so soon, but I think we were able to take care of the issues brought up in the first review. Qrsdogg (talk) 19:03, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Round 2 

message: Hogg shows as being born on 5 December 1792 and dying on 8 March 1862 yet his age is given as 70. This cannot be if the dates are correct. He would have been 70 if he'd died on or after 5 December 1862 but since he didn't he was only 69 when he died.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.113.48.9 (talk) 07:48, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bug in the date of Death/Age calculation. 

message: only two main sources is used,I dont understand why?--Skashifakram (talk) 06:43, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem with the sources
Talk:Grizzly Tales for Gruesome Kids

message: You can hardly find ANYTHING about this show, online and when you do there's not much, shall I add in some stuff. I could add some of the episodes, guides, and even the deaths (Yes, DEATHS) if i'm allowed.MJN SEIFER 22:23, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shall I put more in? 

message: Hold on, in the trivia section there is a bit that relates to the name Spindleshanks. Are we sure that isn't a nod to Robert Burn's Address To A Haggis? The verse I'm think of runs
"Poor devil! see him owre his trash,
As feckless as a wither'd rash,
His spindle shank, a guid whip-lash,
His nieve a nit;
Thro' bluidy flood or field to dash,
O how unfit!"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.217.6.6 (talk) 14:31, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference?

message: I feel like this page should be split. After all, it's currently about an entire franchise which is taking up a lot of space on a page that might hinder other users' various desktop sizes. Perhaps one should be for the books and the other should be for the television adaptations—not split into four pages, if that's what you think I mean—but maybe one for the books, the other for both television shows, and leave the namesake as a disambiguation link? MonkeyStolen234 (talk) 11:33, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split suggestion

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect GTFGK. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 11#GTFGK until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  MonkeyStolen234 (talk) 13:09, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "GTFGK" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 