Talk:Audi RS 6

message: :Image:AudiRS6 2008.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 01:47, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:AudiRS6 2008.jpg

message: There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Audi R S4 - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 09:22, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: "The DRC's main disadvantage is that it operates without the need for complicated electronics" what kind of statement is this?--Hooperbloob (talk) 04:10, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I was wondering the same thing! 86.181.117.134 (talk) 03:41, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The kind of statement it is, is part of a string of vandalism from the same IP address on April 27, 2012.  This person also changed the caption of the interior photograph to indicate that the Audi's seats are "inferior to those in the CL55 AMG" and changed the sentence after the one in question to state the failure of the Audi suspension could "cause death."  He also claimed in the same sentence that the suspension is "clearly inferior to Mercedes."  I have reverted the vandalism. P924 CarreraGTS (talk) 19:57, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for that! What do you think about his 'five or more miles of flat asphalt' edits on 4 May? Mischievous at best, IMO. 86.181.117.134 (talk) 03:02, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed that as well.  Obviously this person does not have the best interest of the page in mind, and that statement even if true is not cited or particularly relevant.  Top speed is top speed, regardless of distance required to achieve it. P924 CarreraGTS (talk) 20:53, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Strange statement

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Audi RS 6. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110817071238/http://usnews.rankingsandreviews.com:80/cars-trucks/Mercedes-Benz_E63-AMG/ to http://usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/cars-trucks/Mercedes-Benz_E63-AMG/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131203011205/http://usedcarsworld.co.uk/article/audi-rs6-avant-uk-version-2008/ to http://usedcarsworld.co.uk/article/audi-rs6-avant-uk-version-2008/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:31, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified