Talk:Hohokam Pima National Monument

message: I deleted the area number because several online sources give either 1690 or 2501 acres.  No way to tell which is correct without a survey or access to current official documentation.  And, frankly, since it's a secret place, I couldn't point out its boundaries on a map, though the park service seems to have placed a point to it on theirs, but it's right on the southern edge of Coolidge, and not anywhere that 4 square miles of "inaccessible" land appears to be.  24.221.121.232 03:53, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Acreage

message: When I spoke with the folks at the visitor center of Casa Grande National Monument they said that Hokoham Pima National Monument was buried (to preserve it) and will remain so indefinitely. I wish I had a better source for this but I think it would be nice to add to the article so anyone looking to visit it will know that that there is nothing to see, just a dirt field.
PureJadeKid (talk) 16:20, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Access

message: I changed the governing body to the Gila Indian Reservation, since per NPS  "The Monument is located on the Gila River Indian Reservation and is under tribal ownership. The Gila River Indian Community has decided not to open the extremely sensitive area to the public. 
--Pete Tillman (talk) 06:22, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyedit and cleanup

message: My browser shows the location to be way off, in wrong county (too far north). It shows as being in Maricopa County when it should be in Pinal County. Backspace (talk) 04:03, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Map pin marker

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Hohokam Pima National Monument. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090303151014/http://tps.cr.nps.gov/nhl/detail.cfm?ResourceId=562263226&ResourceType=Site to http://tps.cr.nps.gov/nhl/detail.cfm?ResourceId=562263226&ResourceType=Site
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110711130130/http://www.griccrmp.com/Posters/SAA%202005%20Irrigation.jpg to http://www.griccrmp.com/Posters/SAA%202005%20Irrigation.jpg
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:50, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: A version of the Snaketown page was merged into this article back in 2008.  In 2011, someone decided to write a more extensive treatment of Snaketown, but put it there (Snaketown) instead of here.  These should be merged. Magic♪piano 17:23, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: merge I could see the potential for the national monument site to be focused on the modern-day site with the separate snaketown page being focused on the archaeology and history, but right now I think the two have sufficient overlap for them to be merged. Mdewman6 (talk) 23:58, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  Klbrain (talk) 17:30, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Snaketown 

message: The article mentions that Snaketown was added to the National Register of Historic Places in 1974, but this does not make sense to me.  By the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, all NHLs and NPS historical units are automatically added to the NR.  As it was designated an NHL in 1964, it should have been added to the NR in 1966.  If for some weird reason it was not, then it would have been added in 1972, when Congress designated it a Nat'l Monument under the NPS. — Eoghanacht talk 21:50, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  National Register?