Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Microsoft Windows

message: Screenshots of Microsoft products may be licensed under something other than a non-free fair use rationale. See the current discussion. Smallman12q (talk) 23:08, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Microsoft Product Screenshots may not require Fair-use 

message: Hello, I was wondering if anyone could help me. I understand that Microsoft discontinued Binder in XP, but if you had a binder 2000 document (.obd) file on an XP computer, would the Icon be like an XP style one, the same as the Win 2000 one or one of those 'placeholder' white icons? I await your response eagerly. 95jb14 (talk) 19:16, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Microsoft Binder 

message: should Dunbar High School (Fort Myers, Florida) be part of the wikiproject? it's the first microsft certified high school in the country? --~munkee_madness   talk 15:23, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dunabr high school 

message: Windows Neptune (here) and Windows Odyssey (here) have been nominated for deletion. Comments welcome. wjematherbigissue 19:46, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Articles up for deletion 

message: This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 03:36, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP 1.0 bot announcement 

message: The image :file:Aero.svg is used as the logo of Windows Aero. I can't find any place where that logo is used by Microsoft. Also the image seems to be a user made released under GNU GPL so that doesn't add up for a Microsoft Logo as a Microsoft logo would be copyrighted. Is that an actual logo and should it be in the article? --Chris Ssk talk 09:31, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Windows Aero logo 

message: This is to notify members of this WikiProject, within which scope this article falls, that VGASAVE, has been listed for deletion.  Editors interested in the deletion discussion, are invited to participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/.  Thank you. - Ahunt (talk) 11:36, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:AFD|AfD]] nomination of [[VGASAVE]] 

message: Version 0.8 is a collection of Wikipedia articles selected by the Wikipedia 1.0 team for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone.  Articles were selected based on their assessed  importance and quality, then article versions (revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the WikiTrust algorithm.
We would like to ask you to review the Microsoft Windows articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (♦) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8 with the details.  You may wish to look at your WikiProject's articles with cleanup tags and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Monday, October 11th.
We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of October, 2010.  As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as One Laptop per Child and Wikipedia for Schools to extend the reach of Wikipedia worldwide.  Please help us, with your WikiProject's feedback! 
For the Wikipedia 1.0 editorial team, SelectionBot 23:20, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Microsoft Windows articles have been selected for the Wikipedia 0.8 release 

message: Articles tagged using  will retain their Windows importance, but will no longer get assigned a general computing importance unless one is provided explicitly using computing-importance=.
When assessing articles for the Windows project, please consider the computing importance and tag accordingly. For articles which also have a  banner, its importance= must match the Windows computing-importance=.
This will help WP Computing in three ways:
# Improve the accuracy of importance assessments for general computing
# Avoid unexpected changes to the Computing importance that result from changing e.g. the Software or Windows importance
# Bring attention to the parameter for general computing importance, reducing the likelihood of articles accidently being listed in multiple Computing importance categories. (This causes false entries in the Computing reassessment log – see discussion at WP:COMP/A – and likely other problems as well.) --Pnm (talk) 04:06, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Computing importance no longer defaults to Microsoft Windows importance 

message: I just added a few articles to WP Microsoft Windows because they are either:
* Tangentially related to the Windows operating system
* Related to encyclopedic coverage of the Windows platform
Here's the list:
# Adobe Photoshop - application software which has a Windows version
# SetACL - utility software for Windows, exists to replace the built-in Windows command
# Microsoft Office - at times a Windows killer app
# Advanced Systems Format - Microsoft's digital video container used for WMA and WMV
I support a "" interpretation of this project's scope because it exposes Windows-oriented editors who follow this project to all articles related to encyclopedic coverage of Windows. Computing coverage benefits, as does the encyclopedia as a whole. --Pnm (talk) 02:20, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  This project's scope 

message: I have nominated WikiProject Microsoft for deletion at WP:MFD. Please comment here for any concerns. Thank you for your time. JJ98 (Talk) 01:29, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Microsoft is up for deletion 

message: This may of interest to some members here; I have proposed this article for deletion due to serious WP:SYNTH and WP:OR reasons. If you wish please comment on the deletion discussions. cheers. IRWolfie- (talk) 16:17, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nominated for deletion: [[Comparison of Windows and Linux]] 

message: See Talk:Windows Server 2012#Maximum physical processors. Would like some eyes on this.--Jasper Deng (talk) 21:46, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Windows Server 2012 maximum socket information missing 

message: I have challenged the decision to award this article FA status over what I allege is a lack of balance and neutrality in the article.  Fresh opinions and input are encouraged here. Quantumsilverfish (talk) 01:39, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review of FA status for [[Microsoft Security Essentials]] 

message: Is Windows 3.1 a bona fide operating system or is it a Graphical user interface or 
Operating system shell?  It seems to me that MS-DOS was the actual operating system.  DOS was required to run the computer, the job of the operating system.  You could run DOS without Windows 3.1 but you could not run Windows 3.1 without DOS.  You could exit out of Windows and get back to DOS.  You could not exit out of DOS.  You could start Windows 3.1 from the DOS operating system by typing "win" to run the program win.exe. Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 01:04, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Windows 3.1 

message: I'd like to introduce the Template:Version template to Wikipedia with the goal to establish one standard for version history tables (or lists). It simplifies creation of release histories, standardizes release stages and makes the content more accessible. 
Please comment on the template talk page (there already is some discussion). Thanks for your contribution. Jesus Presley (talk) 07:07, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for comments: [[Template talk:Version|Establish standards for version history tables in software articles]] 

message: I would like some opinions about this article before I submit it for a GA review.--Jasper Deng (talk) 06:13, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pre-GAN review requested for [[Windows Server 2012]] 

message: There is a dispute at Commons:Administrators%27_noticeboard#Problematic_closure_of_deletion_request_after_one_day over the image :File:Windows_logo_and_watermark_-_1985.svg. This image was used in a Windows blog in 2012 but the earliest use of it I can find is in 2010 and not by Microsoft. If someone can find a use before 2010 somewhere and preferably in 1985 then the matter can drop otherwise there is a problem about people arguing as I see it that policies trump common sense. Dmcq (talk) 13:23, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dispute over Windows 1.0 logo 

message: A proposal for a WikiProject Apps has been made at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Apps. As WikiProject Microsoft Windows is a related WikiProject, members of this WikiProject are invited to join the discussion. Thank you. XapApp (talk) 02:31, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Apps Proposal 

message: :inage:Format dialog box in Windows.png has been nominated for deletion -- 65.94.79.6 (talk) 07:02, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Format dialog box in Windows.png

message: I've noticed several Windows articles that in theory are candidates for deletion because they make no claim to notability (e.g. Private Character Editor and Netsh) and/or rely entirely on Microsoft sources (e.g. Windows 7 File Recovery‎, Microsoft Message Queuing and SQL Azure‎). I appreciate that per WP:PRIMARY it is OK to use primary sources "to make straightforward, descriptive statements of facts that can be verified by any educated person with access to the source", but surely each article should have at least one heavyweight third party source—if only to address the question why should wikipedia have an article on this subject? I'll try to improve the SQL Azure article over the next few days, but I'm wondering, has there already been a policy discussion, or perhaps a consensus formed across earlier AfDs, that excuses Microsoft technology articles from meeting the usual WP:N and WP:RS requirements? - Pointillist (talk) 08:47, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability and Sources 

message: I hope this is the right place for this.
So on this page:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ntdetect.com
It says "The bootstrap loader takes the control over the booting process and loads NTLDR"
But according to Microsoft Technet (http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc976737.aspx)
"NTLDR is the bootstrap loader"
The wiki article makes it seem like the Bootstrap loader and NTLDR are two very different things.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.147.164.220 (talk) 10:17, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflicting/confusing information? 

message: :image:XboxMusicLogo.png and :image:XboxVideoLogo.png has been nominated for deletion -- 65.92.181.39 (talk) 03:53, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Windows Xbox store files for deletion

message: You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Windows 8.1#Service packs for Windows 8.0 and Windows 8.1.  Codename Lisa (talk) 22:03, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Service packs for Windows 8.0 and Windows 8.1

message: A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :Windows 5.0 (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Windows 5.0 (disambiguation)  until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Codename Lisa (talk) 19:49, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomination of [[:Windows 5.0 (disambiguation)]] for deletion 

message: There is currently a dispute on the Windows XP page about whether to include migration to Linux as an option for dealing with the end of support for Windows XP. In an effort to gain input from interested editors I am posting this notice on both Wikipedia:WikiProject_Microsoft_Windows and Wikipedia:WikiProject_Linux.
If anyone would like to comment, the discussion can be seen at these locations: Talk:Windows_XP#End_of_life and Talk:Windows_XP#RfC_on_End_of_Life_of_Windows_XP_support. Many thanks.Upedge (talk) 23:40, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  XP End of Life and Linux 

message: You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Microsoft Cortana Easter Eggs.  Codename Lisa (talk) 23:51, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion at  Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Microsoft Cortana Easter Eggs

message: You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2014 May 19#Category:Discontinued versions of Microsoft Windows.  Thanks. Codename Lisa (talk) 07:46, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2014 May 19#Category:Discontinued versions of Microsoft Windows

message: Windows XP visual styles has been nominated for deletion. The discussion is here. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:03, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion notification 

message: Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment on the WikiProject X proposal 

message: Hello everyone!
You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!
Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.
Harej (talk) 16:57, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject X is live! 

message: It was proposed back in 2010 that the Interix article be merged into Windows Services for UNIX. Discussion ended mid-2011 with a consensus for no merge, but was never closed, leading a different editor (uninvolved in the original discussion) to reopen discussion. I'd like some more uninvolved editors to take a look at the articles and participate in the merger discussion so we can establish whether or not consensus has changed in the past three and a half years. // coldacid (talk|contrib) 17:12, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attention needed for proposed merger of [[Interix]] into [[Windows Services for UNIX]] 

message: Hi everybody at the Microsoft WikiProject! I am creating a draft of Mail (Microsoft app), the Mail client for Windows 8, Windows 8.1, and Windows 10. I have not gone so far in progress, but I encourage you to check it out and tell me what you think, and what improvements I could make. Thanks! CookieMonster755 (talk) 01:53, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[User:CookieMonster755/Mail (Microsoft app)|Mail (Microsoft app)]] 

message: Hi. There is a small dispute in  that I was hoping someone could help with. Hopefully, it is not serious. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 16:21, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Talk:Windows thumbnail cache 

message: please help solve the dispute about Windows Me capitalisation. Maria Kappatou (talk) 05:38, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  dispute over Windows Me capitalisation (ME vs Me) 

message: Microsoft uses the Windows Me spelling. This is the most common spelling and PC World also uses it. Googling "windows me" on any search engine reveals that Windows Me is more common than Windows ME. Should the Wikipedia Windows ME article be moved to Windows Millennium Edition? Should the article use the Windows Me spelling? Maria Kappatou (talk) 05:28, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Windows Me or Windows ME? 

message: Hi, I am currently in the process of reviewing the article - Windows Ultimate Extras for the Good Article status. The review discussion is taking place at Talk:Windows Ultimate Extras/GA1. Interested members may join the discussion and improve the article as per the concerns raised there. Thank you! Yashovardhan (talk) 05:56, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good article review of [[Windows Ultimate Extras]] 

message: We – Community Tech – are happy to announce that the Popular pages bot is back up-and-running (after a one year hiatus)! You're receiving this message because your WikiProject or task force is signed up to receive the popular pages report. Every month,  will post at /Popular pages with a list of the most-viewed pages over the previous month that are within the scope of .
 
We've made some enhancements to the original report. Here's what's new:
* The pageview data includes both desktop and mobile data.
* The report will include a link to the pageviews tool for each article, to dig deeper into any surprises or anomalies.
* The report will include the total pageviews for the entire project (including redirects).
We're grateful to  for his original , and we wish his bot a happy robot retirement. Just as before, we hope the popular pages reports will aid you in understanding the reach of , and what articles may be deserving of more attention. If you have any questions or concerns please contact us at m:User talk:Community Tech bot.
Warm regards, the Community Tech Team 17:16, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Popular pages report 

message: A new Newsletter directory has been created to replace the old, out-of-date one. If your WikiProject and its taskforces have newsletters (even inactive ones), or if you know of a missing newsletter (including from sister projects like WikiSpecies), please include it in the directory! The template can be a bit tricky, so if you need help, just post the newsletter on the template's talk page and someone will add it for you.
:– Sent on behalf of Headbomb. 03:11, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A new newsletter directory is out! 

message: A discussion is taking place as to whether :Portal:Microsoft is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The page will be discussed at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Microsoft (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the page during the discussion, including to improve the page to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the deletion notice from the top of the page. North America1000 07:14, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomination of [[:Portal:Microsoft]] for deletion 

message: Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for information on WP1.0 web tool 

message: Cortana, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. TheAwesomeHwyh 16:40, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cortana reassessment 

message: I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like
*John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.)
and turns it into something like
* John Smith "" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.
It will work on a variety of links, including those from ,  and .
The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.
Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.
-  Headbomb {t · c · p · b}
This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  User script to detect unreliable sources 

message: There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Media Player (Windows 11)#Requested move 13 March 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 13:27, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move at [[Talk:Media Player (Windows 11)#Requested move 13 March 2023]] 

message: Hello!
This old, formerly unexplained Windows bug has been explained completely in a recently published YouTube video. Unfortunately, the explanation in the Wikipedia article is wrong, and the YouTube article doesn't look like a suitable source. The video does say how to reproduce the bug though, which I believe hasn't been done before. Someone familiar with what sources might work in an article like this should have a look. Thanks! --Renerpho (talk) 19:36, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reliable source for [[Bush hid the facts]] bug 

message: Hello, I am working on creating a new WikiProject, and I am looking for others to join in the creation of WikiProject Operating systems. If you'd be interested in joining and supporting the project, add your name to the proposal support list here. Thanks! OnlyNano 20:44, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal of new WikiProject: Operating Systems