lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:British campaign in the Baltic (1918–1919)

message: :Should there be mention of the co-operation between Finns and British Navy. After all portion of the Royal Navy anchored at Björkö and was covered by small (by contemporary standards) squadron of newly formed Finnish Navy's ships (torpedoboats and coastal minesweepers) though Finns did not participate to combat. And Finns lost 3 of their torpedoboats as delayed British departure forced the weakhulled ex-Russian torpedoboats to sail home in far too thick ice. Again not a big loss by its era's standard but for Finnish Navy it was a major disaster - after all those 3 boats made 1/3 of its torpedoboats. All very closely related to the British operations in the Baltic in 1918-19. - Wanderer602 (talk) 18:09, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Finns and British in the Baltic in 1919

message: I thought that picture from actual conflict period taking preference over picture from later time is quite a no brainer. But whatever, lets keep it as you want then.--Staberinde (talk) 13:38, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: In my opinion the Inglise laevastik Koporje lahes.jpg which was used by Staberinde is far better than picture of Marat. Also I'm not sure if Jaan actually prefers the old pic over new one but rather that major changes to the infobox should in general first be discussed or at very least declared on the talk page. - Wanderer602 (talk) 14:18, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The latter. Thanks for your comment. --Jaan Pärn (talk) 19:08, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: So how about we open the discussion. What kind of picture do we ideally want? Why is one of the pictures better than the other? Does it have a more famous ship or a more important situation on it? --Jaan Pärn (talk) 10:09, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: British campaign in the Baltic in 1918-1919 was primarily a naval campaign so picture related to that would be ideal. Both of the current candidates fulfilled this criteria. Another thing is that Inglise laevastik Koporje lahes.jpg shows ships that were active for most of the campaign, as it happened the heavier elements of the Baltic Red Fleet (like Petropavlovsk/Marat, which was the only operational battleship) mostly just stood idle at Kronstadt. Furthermore picture of Marat is dated to 1925 while the image of the British ships is actually contemporary to the naval campaign. - Wanderer602 (talk) 10:35, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jaan's revert of infobox picture 

message: I'd like to suggest that we change the "Ships sunk" heading in the article to "Casualties". Would this be alright? Utahwriter14 (talk) 16:15, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changing "Ships sunk" to "Casualties"
Talk:Martian scientist

message: Should it be noted that The Earth (and related articles) are tagged every year as violating NPOV by the "martian researcher" on every April Fool's Day? --173.51.29.188 (talk) 03:44, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: No. Jackmcbarn (talk) 04:06, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  A wikipedia tradition
Talk:Modistae

message: According to this free paper (), the tripartion modus essendi/modus intelligendi/modus significandi is derived from the St Thomas Aquinas' interpretation of Aristotle. It is not referenced in the current WP article. 
Hope this helps to avoid the deletion of this or similar articles which are still in interwiki. Best regards.Philosopher81sp (talk) 19:07, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Based on St Thomas Aquinas
Talk:Ordinary language

message: Seems to be little that distinguishes this from ordinary language philosophy, other than that is written much better. Bacchiad (talk) 20:49, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: * Any merger would be best done into this page as ordinary language is a bigger topic than particular schools of philosophy. Andrew D. (talk) 20:25, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with Ordinary Language Philosophy?

message: The first paragraph currently says
: For example, the statements "I find that class of person very annoying" and "Birds fall into a different class from bees" might be said to contain ordinary English uses of class. 
I think the second example in this sentence should be deleted. While it might be an example of ordinary English when spoken by a non-biologist, it would be an example of technical English when spoken by a biologist (distinguishing the class Aves from the class Insecta.) if it is removed, the remaining example in the sentence will be sufficient to make the point. Loraof (talk) 15:44, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad example 

message: Does anyone agree? Let's merge it with Ordinary Language Philosophy? OhWhyNot (talk) 04:16, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  This comes off as Anti-Analytic Philosophy 

message: Left the reasons in the log.
Wait, I changed it, and answered back, but that wasn't me... OhWhyNot (talk) 09:13, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: As reviewing administrator, I did not delete  the article.  If you want to sugegst a merge , suggest a merge, but I think there are probably sufficient sources. It's certainly not a reason for speedy.  DGG ( talk ) 08:46, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speedy Deletion 

message: Shouldn't this be redirected to natural language?--37.251.220.113 (talk) 14:24, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect to natural language
Talk:Performative contradiction

message: What about adding a link to the "wave function collapse" article?
Maurice Carbonaro (talk) 11:32, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see the connection. Peterdjones (talk)  11:55, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  See also section 

message: I can't help but think there must be better examples than "Do as say, not do as I do" - which isn't one as it is an instruction. There's no 'arguably' about it. The other one about hierarchies is very obscure and somewhat debatable.
Lucaswilkins (talk) 01:53, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree about "Don't do as I do, do as I say". It doesn't contradict any presupposition. Loraof (talk) 23:39, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Examples are Dubious
Talk:Sphoṭa

message: If your browser doesn't render ṭ, you have a serious problem on your end. The solution to that problem isn't moving articles.
The article should reside at Sphoṭa, as a technical term that doesn't have any current anglicization. --dab (𒁳) 22:24, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Please move it back. Shreevatsa (talk) 22:30, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: undiscussed move

message: Any chance of a brief definition we could use for this word on sister project Wiktionary? 86.179.191.90 (talk) 21:01, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not too easy to understand
Talk:United Nations Security Council Resolution 94

message: ==Untitled==
this article needs to be soured think youOo7565 06:42, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As it is, this article was sourced at wikisource so I figure I'm justified in removing the tag. - Schrandit 15:58, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: why tag was added

message: this article needs to be soured think youOo7565 06:42, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As it is, this article was sourced at wikisource so I figure I'm justified in removing the tag. - Schrandit 15:58, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:Rotherham United F.C. players

message: My name is Brian Skelton I was full time paid player at Rotherham United from June 1972 to May 1976. Could I pleased ask to be added to the list. 2A02:C7F:5ECF:A100:E163:2DE9:EA77:D014 (talk) 21:06, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brian Skelton updated to the list
Talk:Bluecoat

message: The photo caption here says the statue is of Carr. The QEH article says it is just a bluecoat boy, which is what I had always thought. Surely a statue of Carr would show him as a rich old chap capable of endowing a school, not a strapping young Captain of Rugby type??? :) 138.37.199.206 07:17, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Meh, I was always told it was John Carr, but I forgot to change this a few months back after Kev Meredith asked the school about it. My bad. mattbuck 07:56, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Aha, nice one, thanks. 138.37.199.206 14:10, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  John Carr?
Category talk:Scientific misconduct

message: I propose to make two more specific subcategories :category:Scientific fraud and :scientific plagiarism. 08:52, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

message: As discussed in the article Scientific misconduct, it might not be justified to attribute the responsibility of a scientific misconduct exclusively to the main person involved. Secondly, as argued at the talk page of Schön scandal, framing the misconduct cases to people makes it difficult to give a balanced overview on each misconduct case with all the parties involved and the consequences in the institutions/scientific community. I would prefer having a separate article created of each notable misconduct case. --Qtea (talk) 21:12, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problematic framing scientific misconduct cases to names of people
Talk:Lattice gas automaton

message: This is a nice stub-class article with good references.
It would be nice to include some of the mathematical details
with corresponding images and examples. Maybe I will get around to adding something myself this week. It is a current project of mine just now.--Михал Орела (talk) 19:34, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  images and examples 

message: The PhD reference used extensively in the article is not accessible!
:James Maxwell Buick (1997). Lattice Boltzmann Methods in Interfacial Wave Modelling. PhD Thesis, University of Edinburgh. (Chapter 3 is about the lattice gas model.) Online *** 404 NOT FOUND *** 2008-11-13
--Михал Орела (talk) 06:34, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  references 

message: There is no problem in making FHP deterministic, I don't see why this is stated.
--82.113.121.126 (talk) 19:36, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  FHP nondeterministic 

message: I removed :Image:HPP small.gif from the article. It is a large (~40Mb) animated gif that was causing my browser (Chrome 8.0 under OS X 10.6.6) to freeze up every time I attempted to view the article. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:09, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added it back as a thumbnail () per suggestion of 64.216.119.125 (talk). The image is not animated, and won't cause your browser to freeze unless you actually click the picture for animation. benzband (talk) 20:35, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed animated gif
Talk:Robot ethics

message: How does this article get away with not mentioning Isaac Asimov's Three Laws which is the cornerstone of the entire subject of Roboethics? All work in this field is the result of discussion, criticism, modification or improvement (and even rejection) of Asimov's original ideas. Its like an article about gravity not mentioning Newton! Roger (talk) 12:59, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Asimov? 

message: *Include any missing info (esp Asimov, future etc.)
*refs
*check content
*reassess after work done
Chaosdruid (talk) 05:24, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Attention needed

message: This article has a large collection of external links relative to its length, and I think some of them are only tangentially relevant. I like the organizations, but I think they belong in other articles. In particular, I'd propose to remove at least these: The Centre for Responsible Nanotechnology, Union of Concerned Scientists, The International Institute of Humanitarian Law, Humanity+. Does anyone have objections? Brian Tomasik (talk) 07:43, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: External links not sufficiently relevant

message: I believe that in this section, something ought to be said about the recent Spike Jonze film "Her", and its relevance to the subject.--67.1.164.146 (talk) 02:15, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  In Popular Culture 

message: Should robots be able to feel pain? Just granpa (talk) 15:52, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: How? – Epipelagic (talk) 08:17, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should robots be able to feel pain? 

message: — Assignment last updated by York1210 (talk) 06:56, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - SU23 - Sect 200 - Thu
Category talk:Singularitarianism

message: :Hello,
I am writing an evaluation for my class. I want to publish one question, then post my evaluation. What are some of the core values in those who are singularitarians?
This is my evaluation. The article has a solid lead section that identifies, concisely, what singularitarianism is, and what it means to hold this belief. The content is up to date, with the last edit in March 2020. The article does not seem to try to persuade, but does lack content. The article gives a short summary of what it means to hold singularianistic views, but does not deliver its origin, or credible individuals who hold this view. There are only a small number of subcategories that follow, but does give a list of singularitarians. This article has only links, no citations, so it is hard to say where this information is coming from. The organization is fine, simple, and easy to follow. On the talk page there is no direct dialogue between editors, however this article is directly linked to Wikipedia:WikiProject Philosophy and Wikipedia:WikiProject Transhumanism where one can start a conversation around the core values of philosophy and the discussion on singularitarianism within a group of people who wish to expand the philosophical coverage on wikipedia. My overall impression is that the article could use some more information, could cite sources of origin, and give examples of people who hold this belief. The article is not complete, but it is explaining a belief around values, and ideals, that might not have a lot of notability yet.--Jmorales96 (talk) 23:11, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
Talk:The Rivieras

message: this article needs to be soured think youOo7565 07:56, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: why tag was added

message: Only 1 mention of the name "Nolte". Says Nolte left the band to join the Marines. No other mention; no first name, instrument, not listed as a member. 73.182.132.18 (talk) 19:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nolte?
Talk:Preah Suramarit National Theatre

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20070715172528/http://www.phnompenhpost.com/TXT/comments/c1325-1.htm. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moneytrees🌴Talk🌲Help out at CCI!  03:06, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Pumpkin pie spice

message: maybee consider merging with the pumpkin pie paige.68.83.199.209 (talk) 03:46, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled

message: I read the reference, and the article says "not a lot of pumpkin in it." Is there support for the no pumpkin claim somewhere else? To be fair "not a lot of pumpkin" might be a way of saying "no pumpkin" legally, since zero is not a lot.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:9000:E700:6050:6528:5A3D:B0EA:31D7 (talk) 16:39, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: No pumpkin in it?
Talk:Molyneux's problem

message: I don't understand how or why this counts as a problem at all, let alone a philosophical one. Isn't it just a question of fact? Either a person who used to be blind can recognise these objects by sight, or they can't. Has anyone ever bothered to ask a person who used to be blind about the "problem"? What was that person's answer?  
Could somebody out there maybe address this point in the article itself (without doing original research)?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.17.154.79 (talk) 21:45, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You don't understand? Well, I got bad news for you. You are doing it wrong. You are Epic fail.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.85.220.125 (talk) 01:20, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  How is this a *philosophical* problem? 

message: Maybe someone wants to add a paragraph about the study of Marius von Senden: „Die Raumauffassung bei Blindgeborenen“. (Dissertation, Kiel 1931). Book store title: „Raum- und Gestaltsauffassung bei operierten Blindgeborenen vor und nach der Operation“. Leipzig 1932. He collected in 66 cases, and his work is especially interesting because his conclusions were one of the main sources for Donald O. Hebb's Organization of Behavior (1949). -- 78.53.72.96 (talk) 07:15, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Senden/Hebb 

message: The question is, "can a man born blind distinguish objects by sight if given the ability to see?" The Sinha study found "subjects could distinguish between objects visually as effectively as they would do by touch alone." This seems to answer the question affirmatively. However, this article the study concluded the answer to the question was "no". Am I somehow misunderstanding the question or the study? --beefyt (talk) 06:44, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the study as presented in the article, they could only distinguish them, but were unable to "name" them (like "ball" or "cube") based on previous (tactile) experience. Qarel (talk) 12:27, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sinha study 

message: Can anyone find the corresponding Arabic text from Hayy ibn Yaqdhan where he mentions the story which is similar to the Molyneux problem? The full Arabic text should be here but I still cant find the "imagine a person born blind" line?--الدبوني (talk) 20:16, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hayy ibn Yaqdhan
Talk:Mrs. Dash

message: The fact that it contains cilantro is not grounds for stipulating that eaters exercise "caution." Badagnani (talk) 23:34, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Cilantro]] 

message: Please revert this edit pending discussion and consensus, please. Thank you, Badagnani (talk) 22:35, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undiscussed/non-consensus edit 

message: do any mrs. dash products contain monosodium glutamate in
some natural or artificial form, or pre-monosodium glutamate or post-monosodium glutamate or other harmful
related or unrelated compounds?
63.192.20.149 (talk) 20:13, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: All we have to go on is their list of ingredients. Glutamic acid compound are present in many natural foods. Regarding other chemicals, you might have to write to the company to ask. Badagnani (talk) 20:30, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I can guarantee that it contains either related or unrelated compounds.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.72.204.139 (talk) 02:47, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  monosodium glutamate? 

message: 'Outside' sources for products is NOT 'best evidence', regardless of Wiki-policies. Yes, most of the cites herein are from the company website [original/primary source], but what other 'encyclopedic' sources are there for such? I have updated the product listings today.
 149.20.203.67 (talk) 01:03, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Advertising', etc.
Talk:Empirical research

message: See Talk:Empirical_method#Merge. Any oppositions?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kuphrer (talk • contribs) 17:45, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Since merged. -- Beland (talk) 22:35, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge to [[Empirical method]]

message: The hypothesis provided "People who study a word list while listening to vocal music will remember fewer words on a later memory test than people who study a word list in silence" is less of a hypothesis and more of a prediction. A hypothesis is about understanding the cause while a prediciton is about guessing an outcome. The root hypothesis is that the mental facility for memory is disturbed by background sounds. This can then be tested in different ways such as white noise, noise with words, instrumental sounds. Whether the subject speaks the words while studying. Background noises that interfers with properly hearing the words spoken. 
As is says over at Hypothesis, A scientific hypothesis is a proposed explanation of a phenomenon. The simple predicition provided is not a proposed explaination of a phenomenon. It is a prediction of an unobserved phenomenon.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.103.184.76 (talk) 19:20, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: hypothesis

message: Thus, there is an error in the following statement: "By contrast, non-empirical evidence is subjective, depending on the observer." I would also caution against the use of the word subjective here, as it is misleading. All observation is "subjective".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rodney.k.b.parker (talk • contribs) 03:54, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mathematics is non-empirical
Talk:Data independence

message: one advantage of database approach is data independence. kindly elaborate such statement.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.14.87.23 (talk) 08:17, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  question 

message: This article is confused and confusing, probably because it's not based on a reliable source. It keeps jumping between paradigms and using terminology that is not defined or referenced elsewhere on Wikipedia. I would be tempted to delete the whole article and just use the more meaningful one on the ANSI-SPARC Architecture. Egrabczewski (talk) 18:47, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confused
Talk:Recado rojo

message: the ingredients list mentions only "oregano", and this is linked to the WP article about the European plant - I would have thought it would be "Mexican oregano" (Lippia graveolens). 
Could someone please clarify in the text (and correct the link to go either to the 'Lippia g'. or the 'oregano Disambiguation' page)?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:3030:A73:A518:A7D2:A758:3DA:EF5B (talk) 10:24, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  European oregano, really?