lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Canon law

message: The bulk of the first section does not talk about canon law but instead talks about those who failed to follow it by means of wealth or power. This material should be removed or given its own section. Ian Hampson, Wales, February 2019 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.254.201.36 (talk • contribs) 08:12, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Exeptions

message: "Greek Church" can refer to a grouping of Byzantine-rite Churches, but in this case, because each one is being individually named, "Greek Church" referred specifically to the Greek Byzantine Catholic Church of Greece. Elizium23 (talk) 02:21, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greek Church 

message: There is a Redundant List Section, This Should be Under the Sub Article Code of Canons of the Eastern Churches. 
The Catholic Church also includes the main five rites (groups) of churches which are in full union with the Holy See and the Latin Church:Alexandrian Rite Churches which include the Coptic Catholic Church, Eritrean Catholic Church, and Ethiopian Catholic Church. West Syriac Rite which includes the Maronite Church, Syriac Catholic Church and the Syro-Malankara Catholic Church. Armenian Rite Church which includes the Armenian Catholic Church. Byzantine Rite Churches which include the Albanian Greek Catholic Church, Belarusian Greek Catholic Church, Bulgarian Greek Catholic Church, Greek Catholic Church of Croatia and Serbia, Greek Byzantine Catholic Church[citation needed], Hungarian Greek Catholic Church, Italo-Albanian Catholic Church, Macedonian Greek Catholic Church, Melkite Greek Catholic Church, Romanian Greek Catholic Church, Russian Greek Catholic Church, Ruthenian Greek Catholic Church, Slovak Greek Catholic Church and Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church.East Syriac Rite Churches which includes the Chaldean Catholic Church and Syro-Malabar Church.
All of these church groups are in full communion with the Supreme Pontiff and are subject to the Code of Canons of the Eastern Churches.
 Stalin Sunny Talk2Me 02:55, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redundant List Section 

message: On the surface at least, it seems we have two articles about the same thing: Canon (canon law) and Canon law. It looks like an obvious WP:FORK violation. Is there a convincing reason not to merge them? --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 23:35, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: See my answer at Talk:Canon (canon law)#WP:FORK violation?. Veverve (talk) 23:38, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:FORK]] violation? 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Philosophy, theology, and fundamental theory of canon law and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 12#Philosophy, theology, and fundamental theory of canon law until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Veverve (talk) 16:48, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Philosophy, theology, and fundamental theory of canon law" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Newsreel

message: There is very little info on each of these. I would suggest putting info on this page rather than creating new articles until there's more-than-a-stub.Zosodada 17:38, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The un-sourced "created in 1908" is confusing -- as I understand it, though there were news films as far back as the 1890s, the "newsreel" began when Pathe began distributing weekly in 1910. Cf:  http://sunnycv.com/steve/filmnotes/newsreel.html 
Let me know if anyone has more info. Grahamtalk/mail/e 15:38, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation on invention 

message: The cinema "Daily Bioscope" is given a foundation date in 1909 but this source lists May 1906: https://thebioscope.net/2010/08/30/the-london-project-2/ 
Either way, that's before newsreels were invented in a form we'd call "newsreels." Grahamtalk/mail/e 15:47, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Daily Bioscope
Talk:Phonetic complement

message: This page appears to define phonetic complements as determinatives.  Must rework. -Ben 17:47, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Not as determinatives, but it's not clear, and not confined to Cuneiform. At least Japanese and Mayan also do this. kwami (talk) 09:03, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I hope my English example in the article makes the meaning clear. Greensburger (talk) 04:46, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That helped. I expanded it a bit. kwami (talk) 12:43, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Removing some incorrect trivia (found in 680549567). Thanks to Criminy1!
Occasionally okurigana coincide with a component of the preceding compound Chinese characters, though this is generally a coincidence, and does not mean that same character is functioning as a phonetic both in the Chinese character and in the following okurigana. Notably, 割り wa-ri, as in the word 割り算 (wa-ri-zan, division), the right side of 割 is 刂, and both the hiragana り and katakana リ ri derive from 利 (the katakana リ from the right side 刂), so one might think that 
刂 is the phonetic complement of both 割 and 利, but in fact it functions as a semantic in both. Fundamentally, in Japanese use of Chinese characters, phonetic complements in the Chinese character correspond to the Sino-Japanese (on, originally Chinese) reading, while okurigana come from part of the native Japanese reading, and any time these are the same is simply a coincidence.
:—Nils von Barth (nbarth) (talk) 01:49, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Okurigana vs. complement trivia
Talk:Military rule

message: What is the criteria for being included in the list of military occupations in this page?
:also known as Military occupation as in: 
:* Occupation of Czechoslovakia
:...
:* Occupation of Iraq
It seems like a very arbitary list because neary every armed conflict ends up with some form of military occupation. So if an occupation is listed here is sould be representative of a type of military occupation with an explanation of the type of Military rules used. Eg
* Military Occupation of Berlin --  four-power organization
* Haiti — mandated UN Occupation see UN Stabilization Mission in Haiti
etc Philip Baird Shearer 17:56, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Military rule in Nigeria 41.190.31.135 (talk) 21:24, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Government
Talk:Operation Gladio

message: Based on the third paragraph of the section entitled "Post war creation" ("NATO provided a forum to integrate, coordinate, and optimise... ...in support of SACEUR’s military forces.") this article has a Gunning Fog Index of 18 - is pitched above the reading level of a College Graduate.  I am a college graduate and I am finding this article extremely hard going.
Just one example.  The sentence, "After the creation of NATO in 1949, the CCWU was integrated into the "Clandestine Planning Committee" (CPC), founded in 1951 and overseen by the SHAPE (Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe), transferred to Belgium after France's official withdrawal from the NATO military organization – but not from NATO – which was not followed by the dissolution of the French stay-behind paramilitary movements."  What exactly is being said here?  Several events are being assembled into one sentence but it is far from obvious what the order of these events is and whether there is any causal connection between them.
Specifically, what was founded in 1951?  NATO, CCWU or CPC?  (I can find the answer to this but shouldn't have to if I am reading this.)  Was CCWU transferred after the creation of NATO or after the withdrawal of France from the NATO military organisation?  What caused (or failed to cause) the dissolution of French stay-behind paramilitary movements?
This article is stacked with prose like this making its usefulness limited.
I took the liberty of deleting the paragraph you refer to. It does not add any information that can not be found elsewhere in the article and, on top of that, in clear English.Para medic TaSi (talk) 09:44, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  High Fog Index 

message: But that quote needs contextualizing. Please add context. What efforts is the author referring to in that article? The quote as it stands is vague, and I don't understand to what it specifically refers.
That information needs to be added.
Ollie Garkey (talk) 16:24, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved quote from intro to Italy section.
Talk:Mac NC

message: I pulled this recent addition:
: The boot firmware for the original Bondi Blue iMac included the identifying text Macintosh NC, so it's clear that either the platform originally intended to be the Network Computer, or some Apple employees had an opinion on the matter.
Anyone have a source?  AlistairMcMillan 18:31, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: iMac firmware
Talk:Beth Ostrosky Stern

message: There is no good sourcing on the article that Beth Ostrosky Stern is an "animal rights activist", she fosters cats in her house, this does not mean she is an activist for animal rights. The animal rights claim is WP:OR and is not supported by good sourcing. Psychologist Guy (talk) 00:55, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Animal rights
Talk:Tributary

message: Can they really overflow causing massive flooding? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.204.52.6 (talk) 19:07, 31 January 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Having a diagram forthis article can make it better. The League of Crazy Men 11:28, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Diagram

message: Please don't put here the Dutch wikilinks as there both tributaries and distributaries are treated. Or else there will be a mess in wikilinks. Andres 12:05, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Dutch wikilinks

message: Category:Wikipedia requested images of rivers and waterfalls
If one looked only at the pictures, one might think tributary means 'small river'.  Have we no pictures of small rivers contributing to greater ones? —Tamfang (talk) 16:04, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done!  😃 Anythingyouwant (talk) 21:03, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  pictures
Talk:Principle of linguistic relativity

message: I think this is important, and somebody who knows better than I should summarize it:
[Language, Learning, and Color Perception]
Deleted the note at the bottom of the page. It rehashes something mentioned above while slightly contradicting it, and is decidedly unencyclopedic. If it merits inclusion someone should rephrase it and work it back into the article.
203.199.50.16 06:11, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think not. I can see no reason why it should not redirect to Sapir-Whorf hypothesis. Cnilep (talk) 16:43, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Nasdaq

message: Please check the CMT Codeamaster8.com is it trustworthy?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:201:5502:D0F0:B5E4:FC99:E8FB:BA44 (talk) 10:31, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved   (t · c) buidhe 05:31, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: NASDAQ →  – Formalizing the above move request, the all-caps styling has not been the proper name of this stock exchange in many years. It is not only no longer styled as such by the exchange themselves in either text or their logo, but also by third-party coverage from such reliable sources as The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal, who might know a thing or two about the stock markets. oknazevad (talk) 05:08, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 27 January 2021 

message: The Internet wasn't created till 1983, so I don't think the NASDAQ was really created in 71, as a global trading system. Perhaps there were 5 or 6 guys with file on companies on their computers, but they had to punch cards to talk to the thing, so.... come on now, let's get it right.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:6010:4404:D1D4:5DCB:8741:C016:882C (talk) 14:17, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: You do realize that computer networking long predates the global internet, right? oknazevad (talk) 15:12, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  creation date 

message: Wikidata says that NASDAQ had its conception on the 4th of February 1971, while the article says it was found on the 8th of February. Which is correct? toreau (talk) 20:11, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Founded" vs "inception"? 

message: Link to source:
https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro/nasdaq/2017/34-81917.pdf ScratchyGamer314 (talk) 13:42, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Only for ones after the change. The ones from before were still properly all caps reflecting the name's original creation as an acronym. That they later went to mixed case can and should be mentioned, and references after that should be in said mixed case, but it would be anachronistic to use it before the official change. oknazevad (talk) 13:51, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should all the "NASDAQ" acronyms be changed to "Nasdaq" to conform with their name change SEC filing from 2017
Talk:James Mason

message: Much of Mason's success was because he spoke so well.  His speaking voice was a pleasant bass baritone and his British accent sounded like money.
I think the wikipedia entry should mention both. GuyBig (talk) 02:04, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: That his accent sounded like money? I think not. --  Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 03:12, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

text: Sure; do you have a source that's discussed this? DonIago (talk) 13:54, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  James Mason's voice and his British accent
Template talk:New Zealand political parties

message: What's the criteria for inclusion inthis template?  At present it includes Parliamentary parties, registered parties, unregistered parties, and some which seem to be defunct.  It would be nice to have a clear criteria, or to have a further split between registered parties (which can contest the party list) and unregistered onces )which can't). IdiotSavant (talk) 03:22, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: In the absence of further guidance, I propose the following inclusion criteria for the "unregistered" section:
* If the party ran candidates in the previous election;
* If the party was registered at the previous election;
* If the party has announced its intention to register or run candidates at the next election.
Parties which announce that they will no longer be active should not be included.--IdiotSavant (talk) 09:34, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That sounds sensible. Once the next election date is announced, then parties which might meet the first two criteria, but haven't been heard of since, might also be dropped, so only parties with some relevance to the upcoming election are included.-gadfium 18:29, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with Gadfium's comments. Schwede66 19:52, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

text: With the deregistration of the New World Order Party, they should be (re?)moved. Quadparty (talk) 01:38, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Inclusion criteria
Talk:Joe Simpson (manager)

message: The article seems clean and tidy now. What cleanup needs to be done? It's so short, why not just do it? -Willmcw 04:45, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Unless anyone can suggest what needs to be cleaned up, I'm going to remove the tag. It seems pointless. -Willmcw 08:20, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm guessing that whoever added it wanted the article to be expanded. As far as actual clean-up goes, I agree it doesn't really need any. Everyking 10:30, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: While the MSNBC article referred to in this article asserts that (Antichrist Television Blues) is written about Joe Simpson, it doesn't refer to any clear sources. This interview from the Onion AV Club makes it less than clear that the song is actually based on Simpson, and the other sources online all seem to trace to this post from Fluxblog. While I agree that the lyrics are suggestive, given Win Butler's lack of commitment to the idea, the material ought to be removed, or at least tempered with a "apparent" or "suggests..." type of modifier. 67.185.32.157 09:48, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for finding those sources and pointing out the problem. I've added the AV Club link and re-written the text to make it clear that the band hasn't confirmed the connection.  ·:·Will Beback ·:· 22:54, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

text: I think this connection was confirmed by Win Butler at the Austin City Limits show, before they played the song he said: "Joseph Simpson knelt down in a grove and a dream came to him." Obvious it is going to be hard to use this as a sourse. 213.162.107.4 (talk) 20:17, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: the Arcade Fire

message: One editor keeps removing the ultimate line of her father's infamous adjudication of his daughter's body. It is properly cited, as is the second magazine evaluation of this quote. Please discuss the reasons for further reversions along this line before making them. Thanks. --Vaudedoc (talk) 02:05, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's junk. The source isn't reliable. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 16:49, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The source for which? The original quote by Simpson was reported in The Boston Globe a major, Pultizer Prize-winning paper. The evaluation of his quote was from US Weekly, a magazine with a weekly circulation of 1,850,000. Simpson has never disputed he made the statement, and the Globe's reputation as a major US paper is well-established. As to the second quote, reliability doesn't really enter into it--it's the editorial judgment of Simpson's quote. Would you prefer a different source for the latter (fairly wide-spread) opinion? --Vaudedoc (talk) 02:24, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's no good. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 16:18, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't understand your reply to Vaudedoc. Are you saying that the Boston Globe is not a reliable source? If so, I believe you're mistaken. It's a well-known mainstream newspaper.   Will Beback  talk   19:45, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment regarding Jessica's body
Talk:EuroBillTracker

message: I don't think Canadian Where's Willy served as an inspiration to Eurobilltracker (EBT). On the site's credits, EBT only acknowledges inspiration ("initial idea") on American Where's George. The sentence on Where's Willy was added by Kaiser matias (a Canadian user, by the way).—Preceding unsigned comment added by Lmviterbo (talk • contribs) 19:25, 4 March 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: And I see someone has added that it was influenced more by Canadian Money Tracker (which is true, as I am a member of CMT and remember their mention of us when they started up).—Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.72.89.168 (talk • contribs) 19:26, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This is Giro speaking, the creator of the site. Originally, I was inspired by Where's Georges because I had used that site while in the US. Of course, in the process of building the site and developing it I discovered many other such sites for other currencies, including CMT...—Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.224.222.132 (talk • contribs) 22:19, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where's Where's Willy? 

message: What's the stance of the Wikipedia community on the subject?
(Relevancy links: .eu position .com position  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Argymeg (talk • contribs) 13:25, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The split has ended, see http://www.eurobilltrackerforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=10510 . The official address for the site remains the old www.eurobilltracker.com Avij (talk) 19:48, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Site split? 

message: Seems quite outdated, Shouldn't it be updated or removed?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.115.208.80 (talk) 05:25, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  That colored card 

message: Are EuroBillTracker bills stamped like WheresGeorge bills? I'm assuming they are but the article doesn't mention it. --50.137.171.62 (talk) 06:04, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Usually not, as stamping will reduce the lifetime of the bills. Some people write the URL of the website or stamp the bill, if the bill is very worn and will likely get destroyed soon anyway. Avij (talk) 20:05, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Stamp?
Talk:Microlensing

message: There really should be an independent article on this important subject and not just a re-direct to Gravitational lens. 
Could an outline be:
*A quick outline
*Short introduction to the mathematics (the Paczynski curve)
*Deviations from the Paczynski curve: Parallax/xallarap, finite source effects, binary lens/source.
*What can it be used for - and by whom:
**OGLE
**MicroFUN
**MOA
**MACHO
**PLANET
**EROS (although they don't exist anymore)
--Vinter 21:24, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Richard Wilhelm (sinologist)

message: Does anyone have any more info on Wilhelm? He was obviously a remarkable man. A close friend of Jung's and someone who was clearly very in with Chinese Esoteric circles despite being a devout Western Christian. This guy helped open up Chinese Mystical Culture to us - The I Ching, the Tao Te Ching & The Secret Of The Golden Flower - and yet he gets barely a few lines here! The very fact that he was allowed to get hold of a copy of the Golden Flower is worth talking about. Surely someone knows something about him! ThePeg 20:34, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Carl Jung included a chapter on Wilhelm in Memories,_Dreams,_Reflections. Some of it may be useful. Rgdboer (talk) 05:42, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Enlarge

message: Richard Wilhelm's education in China consistently credits Xuan, but variously as Lau Nui Suan, Lao Nai-hsuan, and Lao Naixuan. His years are given as 1843 to 1921 in Wilhelm's article in the German WP. As this teacher provided through Wilhelm a bridge between cultures, more detail of his life would be appreciated. Rgdboer (talk) 03:30, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: The Chinese teacher
Talk:Kathy Bates

message: Why doesn't it mention A Home of Our Own? That was a great first movie for Kathy Bates.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:547:C600:BCF0:C068:711C:1AF7:2486 (talk) 01:06, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

message: PS I Love You (2007) 2A0D:3344:194:2F00:8467:3BD5:8F1B:E838 (talk) 20:43, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure what you're asking for in terms of a change; the film is already mentioned in the article. DonIago (talk) 01:33, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  please add PS I love you 2007