lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:ACM SIGGRAPH

message: I don't see the reason for merging ACM SIGGRAPH (the academic organization) with SIGGRAPH (the annual conference put on by ACM SIGGRAPH).
* I agree, and removed the merge tag since the person who left it did not leave an explanation. He is welcome to comment here. — brighterorange (talk) 20:20, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: Please comment at my move proposal on Talk:SIGGRAPH. —Tobias Bergemann 10:39, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Move

message: SIGGRAPH is the annual meeting of ACM SIGGRAPH. Both articles are fairly short and there's significant overlap. The most logical thing to do would be to merge the two into an article that is a bit meatier. --Randykitty (talk) 14:58, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  Exactly which references are you referring to? StrayBolt (talk) 01:31, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

text: Closing, given the uncontested objection and stale discussion. Klbrain (talk) 16:09, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge
Talk:Shaman King

message: Is anything wrong with putting a link to this article (Shaman King) in the Shamanism article? The two are related, and not just by name. Anna and Keiko are traditional Japanese shamans, and the Patch Tribe uses elements of Native American shamanism.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.146.126.129 (talk) 16:53, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That's something to discuss at Talk:Shamanism, not here. 「ダイノガイ千？！」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 23:43, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shamanism Article 

message: Any information about this and official sourcing? DragonZero (talk · contribs) 01:20, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There was a chapter published in the kanzenban fanbook about Hana Asakura, but it wasn't called Flowers. I suppose you can remove such info since there is not even info about a magazine.Tintor2 (talk) 01:29, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sequel of Shaman King recently serailized 

message: why is all my contributions deleted? its not false information or irrelevant yet my edits are removed why?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.193.62.115 (talk) 20:09, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: If you mean this edit, then the most likely explanation is that it was removed because it was not sourced to a reliable publication. You can't simply stick anything into this section without citing a reliable publication. —Farix (t | c) 21:38, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  who moderates this? 

message: *CBB : vol. 32
--KrebMarkt (talk) 22:11, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review(s) 

message: I went on Googling and I know on the manga, There were story arcs included in the Shaman King series.
But, Were there any Sagas or Story Arcs of the anime series of Shonen Jump's Shaman King?
If there is, PLEASE Tell me.
Sincerely, JordanBatista.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by JordanBatista (talk • contribs) 00:45, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are there any Sagas/Story Arcs of the Shaman King anime series? 

message: Shueisha has no longer the rights on Shaman King, as its volumes are currently being re-released by Kodansha, should it be listed as a publisher too or still should it be just Shueisha because the series was originally published in its Weekly Shōnen Jump?--Xexerss (talk) 14:28, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should Kodansha be listed as a publisher along with Shueisha?
Talk:Fish as food

message: In the section on Mercury and other toxic materials,
* The first table is not large enough to need to be collapsible,
*The second table needs column headings in order to make sense of it. (I can't add these because I don't know what the columns mean.)
Ehrenkater (talk) 18:13, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mercury and other toxic materials
Talk:Clee Hills

message: Talk:Clee Hill — Clee Hill → Clee Hills – This article is about a range of hills, not one hill. The range consists of Titterstone Clee Hill and Brown Clee Hill hills, both of which have articles. There is also already an article for the nearby village of Cleehill. 
----
:Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
*Support Jcuk 00:01, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: You are missing something. There is no Clee Hill. Says someone who was once was in the bog on a horse on top of Brown Clee on a winters day as it got dark!  It makes more sense to develop an article at Clee Hills and have Clee Hill redirect to it because the article on Clee Hills will of course mention the two hills. Philip Baird Shearer 23:19, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  I am thinking of redirecting Clee Hill to Titterstone Clee Hill rather than Clee Hills. Does anybody oppose?Greenfinch100 17:36, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: "There is a long-standing rumor in the local area of the hills - that is that they are the highest land eastwards until the Ural Mountains in Russia. This may well be true" - hasn't anyone in Shropshire got a half-decent relief map to check it??? 86.132.138.162 00:37, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Height 

message: The claim about being able to pick up signals from Radio Moscow makes every other claim on this page suspect - for a long time, and perhaps still today, you could get Radio Moscow on any shortwave radio anywhere in the UK. --88.106.216.65 (talk) 10:38, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: @88.106.216.65 The claim about the Urals is also untrue and should be removed. it actually about during the 60s when school teachers would tell their pupils that from a local hill, you would be able to see as far as the Ural Mountains, as long as the terrain in between was flat, unfortunately apart from the Netherlands most of Europe has high ground like the Harz Mountains in Germany, the Owl Mountains in The Czech Republic, in fact there are Mountains ranging across Germany all the way downto Italy and Greece, so the bit of trivia is a myth 2A02:C7C:58AB:400:6516:DD73:6F17:E7E0 (talk) 22:21, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Claims about Radio Moscow
Talk:Pelog

message: I would put up a free-use sample of something in pelog, but instead I'm going to make a recording of my college's (FSU) gamelan, which is in pelog selisir, and slap a GFDL on it. —Keenan Pepper 00:00, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Actually I decided to make it public domain because it's so simple; can't really claim copyright on a traditional scale. —Keenan Pepper 20:56, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

message: I erased a few things for the Balinese scales I wasn't sure about because they didn't go with the Javanese information I know. Do they name the notes of the scale differently, or number them differently? From the chart that was at tuning, they equated "pelog" with 1, instead of 4 (as in Java). That changes the reference to pelog selisir, too. If the Balinese do really use the same names starting on a different note, that should be in the table (another column, probably), and an explanation, if possible. Rigadoun 18:01, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow! I have no idea, but I'll remember to ask my teacher Michael Bakan. —Keenan Pepper 01:22, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Balinese note-names

message: It seems very strange to read about the Balinese version of Pelog described with Javanese terms.  Defining Pelog is not like defining Equal temperment.  It needs to be described in each cultural context.  Starting out with research on Central Javanese tunings makes it seem that this research applies to Bali as well as the rest of Java.  I don't think that is the case.  -- Samuel Wantman 07:01, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point. Please do split it up into Balinese and Javanese sections if you think that would improve it. —Keenan Pepper 18:57, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bali/Java 

message: This article lists note number 6th's meaning as "unknown". Doesn't enam/nam literally mean "6" in Javanese?
--Eraticus 09:16, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note names in Java 

message: Curt Sachs in his "The rise of music in the ancient world" claims that pelog must be older than slendro, as the note names "lima" and "nem" meaning "5th" and "6th" are correctly assigned to the 5th and 6th notes in pelog, while they are 4th and 5th notes in slendro. He claims that, being aware that the natives say that slendro is older! This is an old book, so probably some more research has been done since that time, but maybe this argument should not be ignored? Of course we should not discuss this on Wikipedia, but it would be good to check the sources.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.0.84.104 (talk) 12:22, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pelog vs slendro 

message: Multiple instences of these odd "blocks" in the lede.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.95.43.253 (talk) 19:31, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is "ᮕᮦᮜᮧᮌ᮪" ?
Talk:Weight pulling

message: Weight pulling is bad for a dog's joints and bones.  Veterinarians advise against it for that reason. 71.28.243.28 00:45, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Not true. With a proper fitting harness combined with good conditioning- dogs are often able to enjoy satisfying lives since they have additional care and affection from their masters.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.40.134.40 (talk) 22:06, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Joints and bones 

message: "However, in actuality weight pulling dogs do frequently get serious muscle and joint injuries as a direct result of the strain brought on by the weight pulling." Anders Hallgren: Hundsport issue 1-2 2010, page 36  
Given reference consists of a column in the magazine Hundsport and the above statements are taken from the Chronicle. The author of the Chronicle express their opinion. Opinions are not facts. A. Hallgren did not provide any references to the allegations he makes in his column. This matter; if dogs get muscle and joint injuries of WP as a direct cause, needs to be researched before anyone can make any claims of any kind.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Flamma77 (talk • contribs) 10:17, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree that this can't be included. The original addition has been reworded to explain that it's an opinion. It's notable that someone has claimed this, whether or not the claims were substantiated. Not including the information violates WP:NPOV and WP:NOTCENSORED. -- Trevj (talk) 07:47, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:List of Calgary Flames players

message: What does the green mean? It doesn't say, anywhere. And also, why don't you have something that shows what the blue means? BsroiaadnTalk 13:56, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nevermind, I see it now. Though I don't think Hall of Famers should have the same color as the players that have won the Stanley Cup, and I think that bolding is better for current players...but that's just my opinion. BsroiaadnTalk 13:57, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd rather not turn the page into a rainbow of colours.  Personally, I believe that one background colour to indicate a note of some kind is sufficient.  I used green though because it stands out much better than bold text when highlighting players who appeared on the roster in the previous season. Resolute 22:07, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Green

message: Currently every goalie shows "—" for the OTL column, which doesn't seem right.  — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 20:11, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  OTL column for goalies 

message: I know the captains are noted in this article, but we need a proper list. Would anybody mind, if I added one. We need something to direct to, for all those succession boxes on the Player pages. GoodDay (talk) 21:23, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: At some point in the near future, I intend to revisit this article to bring it up to the current FL standards, and otherwise improve it further.  One of the things I intend to do is make the table sortable, which will allow us to group the captains via a table sort.  This will effecitvely duplicate the workings of the old captains list.  Resolute 20:27, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. GoodDay (talk) 20:41, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Captains List
Talk:Discrete component

message: Shouldn't this article be titled Discrete components?  Discrete makes grammatical sense, but I'm not familiar with the term and a google search returns many hits for both spellings. BrainyBroad 00:56, September 4, 2005 (UTC)
:The article should be titled Discrete component. I have changed it. -- RTC 02:50, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
Category talk:Central Asia stubs

message: There's one snag with this stub category - it covers a different area to that covered by the Central Asia geography stub. That is specifically for the five former Soviet Central Asian Republics, plus Mongolia (and is much easier to keep organised because of it). This stub has a considerably wider and more amorphous coverage. Grutness...wha? 01:11, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Coverage
Wikipedia talk:Templates for discussion/Log/September 2004

message: Period of comment histogram - Sept 2004
indicates the number of days during which commentary was received
/ = / = 1 template
days (deleted)	        days (not deleted)
01 |=			01 |=
02 |			02 |
03 |			03 |
04 |			04 |
05 |			05 |
06 |			06 |=
07 |	
08 |	
09 |	
10 |	
11 |	
12 |	
13 |	
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |=
23 |=
Courtland 01:09, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Food science

message: Food science has a lot more to do with nutrition and human health than is suggested here. There should be more focus on that side of things. Haoie 01:18, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: I removed the university food science department external links.  There may be a case for this in a list, separate, or within the article, but, it just looked like a few ads for programs: master programs here, undergraduate here, so, just discuss the appropriateness here please.  --KP Botany (talk) 12:56, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Food science departments 

message: *
*
*Potential ref: 
Bananasoldier (talk) 23:20, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  TAFI collaboration

message: *File:FoodScience-ex2.png
*File:FoodScience-ex3.png
*File:Food Science and Technology.jpg
*File:Food Science and Technology-3.jpg
*File:CSIRO ScienceImage 1319 Food Science Australia.jpg
Bananasoldier (talk) 23:20, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible pictures?

message: Normally they're not separate, see, e.g., Careers & Education in Food Science, Technology & Engineering. Fgnievinski (talk) 16:53, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge [[Food science]], [[Food technology|technology]], and [[Food engineering|engineering]]
Talk:Politics of the Southern United States

message: This article was spun off from the politics section of Southern United States because that section was getting too large. Obviously this article will need a lot more info, which I will add in the coming weeks.--Alabamaboy 01:18, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Spin off

message: Contrary to what is currently stated in the article, George H. W. Bush was officially and legally a resident of Houston, Texas, (and, therefore, the South) when elected president in 1988. He and his wife cast their 1988 (and other) ballots in Houston. Directly prior to his service as Vice President (one does not lose residency while serving in the federal government), he represented Texas in the U.S. House of Representatives. On this list, he should be in exactly the same category as his son.
http://www.nytimes.com/1988/11/10/us/elections-texas-power-houston-used-tall-politicians-claims-next-president.html?pagewanted=all&src=pm
Absmileydix (talk) 19:47, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Southern Presidents / George H. W. Bush 

message: Most of this article addresses elections at the lowest level. Politics at this level is what elected officials do after they are elected: pass statutes, etc.  Student7 (talk) 23:53, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Also has a lot of history. There is a history article. I'll try to move history there and we can see if a separate "political history" or "election history" is needed. Student7 (talk) 23:35, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorting it out will take awhile. All intermixed. Not a lot of "politics" here though. We're lacking info for the elections article. Student7 (talk) 01:19, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Elections

message: How does the percent to come out to 292%
Error? Consigiliere (talk) 02:22, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Political views and affiliations in the South 

message: Slavery was not the main cause of the war...even grant said if he thought the war was about slavery he would offer his services to the south.  Lincoln did not emancipated the slaves in all states.only the states that seceded  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.240.67.4 (talk) 17:17, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slavery 

message: — Assignment last updated by Hvarela2 (talk) 00:03, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Writing 10 Dean
Talk:Mike Alstott

message: Much of this article deserves a big fat "citation needed"Andrew zot 10:40, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I added an unsourced tag to the article, and did some light cleanup. Still needs a lot of work though. Quadzilla99 14:54, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Agreed.  "He is widely regarded as one of the greatest fullbacks of all time." - I don't doubt it but what's the source? 142.196.225.88 (talk) 13:53, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: The whole college section, except for the last sentence, was cut and pasted from his nflplayers.com bio. I removed it, here's the source if anyone wants to use the bio as a source to construct his college career: Make sure you re-word and that it's significantly differen it. A second source should also probabluy be used, maybe Purdue's official site has a bio on him. Quadzilla99 15:03, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I tagged it as a stub which it is now due to the removed info. Quadzilla99 15:05, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Plagiarism

message: Since a few of you seem to be hellbent on using rushing average (despite the fact it's not very informative), let me ask you one question. First off, I'd like to say that how it's done on other infoboxes is irrelevant, especially since you're probably the ones adding them. It should be determined on a case-by-case basis, because frankly 3.7 yards per carry is below average and therefore not impressive at all.
Now, let's pretend you didn't know either stat of Alstott's. Now think - guess Alstott's rushing average. Personally, I'd guess maybe 3.5 or so. Hmmm, pretty close. Now guess Alstott's receiving yard total. I'd have no freaking clue. Given that we've basically just proved that the latter is a much more difficult stat to guess anywhere near it, we've proven that having his receiving yards in the infobox is much more informative to the greater number of people. Who cares if he's a running back. He received for other 2,000  yards, so that's plenty relevant. Just as Marshall Faulk how relevant receiving yards are. I bet he'd tell you he's more proud of those than his yards per carry.►Chris NelsonHolla! 16:17, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Stats: rushing avg. vs. receiving yards
Talk:Winnipeg North (provincial electoral district)

message: I think that "provincial electoral constituency" is the more accurate name. Manitoba uses "ridings" to denote federal seats, and "constituencies" to denote provincial seats; it makes sense to use "constituency" in the page title, as such.
Also, I've just finished creating a "provincial electoral constituency" category for Manitoba to replace the "provincial electoral district" category. CJCurrie 01:37, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Page name
Talk:Fairey Delta 2

message: Aren't at least the Saab 35 Draken, possibly also the Convair F-102 Delta Dagger/F-106 Delta Dart or Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-21/Chengdu J-7 appropriate comparable aircrafts? The 35 is rather similar (and a common comparison to the Dassault_Mirage_III), and it's "210" version was a dedicated concept test aircraft.
--Rootmoose (talk) 10:43, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comparable aircraft 

message: The body text states that the Fairey Delta 2 is a Tailless aircraft, yet the images associated with the article show a tail, is this correct? Best Regards DynamoDegsy (talk) 10:18, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The article on tailless aircraft explains that the term applies to a type with no horizontal stabiliser (tailplane or foreplane), though it may have a fin and rudder. The FD2 is of this type. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 11:26, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tailless aircraft? 

message: The infobox displays a drawing of the Fairey Delta 2, why not use an image in the article? Just wondering if this is on purpose. A-37Dragonfly (talk) 23:58, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is the drawing the infobox image?
Talk:Implications of peak oil

message: I can certainly see why the article is POV tagged. A lot of it was coming from a very green, ecological standpoint, representing this agenda in a way that implied it was the only valid truth. The way the market solution was described as mistaken...when in reality it is energy efficiency that counts is just clearly not true, and to claim it is in this article on Implications of peak oil merely shows we are failing to address the subject fully. The reality is that the economic consequences of a peak could be devastating and far more important than the environmental consequences, but this does not fit in with the green agenda of whoever made these edits. The statement that resource wars will be devastating for the environment is further indication of an environmental agenda (the classic worry about the environment but ignore the human cost approach). The worst of it was many peak oil proponents advise that an alternative energy source should not be considered unless it is less polluting than oil. Can someone source that most peakniks have an environmentalist agenda to believe this. The proposition appears to be that it is better for society to collapse than to use energy sources more polluting than oil, with the word advise trying to give extra weight to the proponents of this environmental agenda. Wikipedia is not the place to promote ideologies and this article needs further work in order to become balanced and neutral, SqueakBox 17:39, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: POV

message: This article survived an Articles for Deletion debate. The discussion can be found here. -Splashtalk 00:20, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Articles for Deletion debate

message: I have added a merge tag, but I am actually going to turn the page into a redirect. The page is full of POV and contains many unsourced statements. Since the Critique of Hubbert peak theory page was deleted, I see no reson to redirect or delete the page. There already is a good "implications" section in the peak oil article, and there is nothing I can find to merge into the article from this one. Still, if anyone wants to merge or view anything on this page, see . Polonium 20:55, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect