Talk:DxO Labs

message: This section is simply some notes about the current state of the art in digital camera technology. There is no information about the technology that DxO specifically uses in its analysis of lenses and sensors. They do have a few articles on their site (http://www.dxomark.com/About/In-depth-measurements) about the testing methodologies. Information from these articles, backed up with independent sources, would make this section relevant to the article. 76.118.1.171 (talk) 19:33, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you so much for your opinion. Certainly the background is important, how measurement and so on, but please be patient. My aim today is to describe that the digital photography is (totally) different with the film camera. Film camera has no sensor, but sensor is important for the digital camera more than lens which the most important of film camera is the lenses. The mindset should be changed. IMO many readers needs the results more than the background and more difficult to make the readers understand, if the background is writing first, because many young peoples today never use film camera and directly go to Automatic digital cameras, they lose something. Digital photography is still developing and many new things will be found continuously. However the background is important, mainly if you want to be an expert, so I will please, if many people also write about the background, in fact I have written a few background in the whole article, but not in certain section, just for the illustrations.Gsarwa (talk) 01:52, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Technology and the Image quality

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on DxO Labs. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add  after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
*Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.popphoto.com/photosoftware/1110/review-dxo-optics-pro.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:35, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on DxO Labs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080705181435/http://www.popphoto.com/photosoftware/1110/review-dxo-optics-pro.html to http://www.popphoto.com/photosoftware/1110/review-dxo-optics-pro.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:13, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: According to their website https://corp.dxomark.com/about-us/ DxOMark split from DxO Labs in 2017. Therefore this page appears to need updating. As for the products, pages exist for Nik Collection, DxO ViewPoint, and DxO PhotoLab, but the two others simply redirect back to DxO Labs - which is odd. Considering DxO has been around for 20 years it seems strange that so few updates have been made. Wonderconboy (talk) 15:48, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I reckon Adobe pays to have admins delete the competition 37.71.191.227 (talk) 10:10, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  DxOMark split from DxO Labs in 2017