lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Bridgestone/Archive 1

message: (Bridgestone bought Firestone in 1988)
It is imporant for all future Firestone/Bridgestone editors too know the background of this page: 
Regarding Firestone/Bridgestone editing this page:
*Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Firestone
The anon above  is . See Wikipedia:Suspected_sock_puppets/Mobile_01#User:Mobile_01_I_am_not_User:203.49.235.50
Thank you, Travb (talk) 21:24, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Information for future Firestone/Bridgestone editors
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Ampligen

message: I'd say this needs a "subst:ab" tag at the end. Otherwise the log looks rather strange. I'll try that now and will revert if it doesn't work. Tikiwont 14:49, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, I missed that. It looks OK now. No idea why the bot signed the edit though... AvB ÷ talk 15:46, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Ghomaras

message: where is bni khaled  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.250.237.9 (talk) 16:51, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  bni khaled 

message: Lots of incorrect information. This is written by a Rif nationalist. It is a population of a million not 12k. And the word Ait is not used by the Ghomara, it is Bni.89.205.140.31 (talk) 02:05, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  False item
Talk:Tatamagouche

message: This page had been vandalized. i restored it form an older version. - AJM
How are Audrey McLellan's cottages? Got dragged there by my Mom (a Nova Scotian) in the late 1980s.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.241.188.64 (talk) 04:48, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A local treasure ... but due to repeated high angle rescue, mistreatment (garbage), vandalism, and serious injuries/deaths, I don't think it deserves to be on this page. There are plenty of other waterfalls in the area that didn't make the page.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.69.216.50 (talk) 21:09, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Drysdale Falls
Talk:Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Company

message: This entry is loaded with praise and advertising slogans for Colonial Life.  It is not written in an unbiased manner as is the standard for wikipedia articles. Nero42 (talk) 18:59, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  This sounds like a corporate advertisement 

message: I filed a claim for  total hip surgery.  My chec was issued on Aug. 17. I filled out all the necessary paperwork including my direct deposit and copy of my bank check. Instead they claim to have sent it by mail. I have not gotten my check..my rent was due 2 days ago. I've maid multiple calls with no help.
I need my check. I've been paying this insurance since 2008 twice a month. What can you do for me. 67.163.215.239 (talk) 17:43, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  My check
Talk:Balderton

message: I have added brief details of two C14 petitions. Crococolana 15:04, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: History 

message: I have added more details about education in Balderton. Crococolana 15:41, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Schools

message: I have added a reference to the parish council and its website.Crococolana 21:49, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately, unless you can source this verifiably beyond your own family, it fails WP:OR. Frickative (talk) 21:57, 3 February 2008 (UTC
See here where the use of bollerton is confirmed on a Lincolnshire genealogy site, 3 April 2004, in a discussion about Ramper
http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/read/ENG-LINCSGEN/2004-04/1081022374
Crococolana (talk) 13:39, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

text: I'd suggest reading WP:VER, which this source still doesn't meet by a long shot unfortunately. Forum posts, posts on blogs, that sort of thing, just aren't classed as verifiable sources by Wikipedia. Frickative (talk) 17:24, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

text: WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is no argument for inclusion. It might be different were 'Bollerton' actually how the village name was pronounced, but I seem to recall mentioning in an edit summary that having lived there for 20 years, not a single person had ever pronounced it that way. Frickative (talk) 16:13, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

text: Look, I certainly didn't make the rules, I've just tried and tried again to explain them. Drop a message over at the talkpage of WP:OR and see what they have to say, because I can almost guarantee that it won't be in favour of inclusion. Frickative 14:16, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Administration 

message: This whole article needs rewriting to take into account the creation of the new parish of Fernwood, effectively lopping the whole Balderton South Ward off the parishSkinsmoke (talk) 22:18, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Subdivision
Talk:Tom McMahon (Democratic operative)

message: Prior content in this  duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://newpartners.ehclients.com/NewPartnersBios.pdf. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Peter James (talk) 17:11, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Association of American Physicians and Surgeons

message: WP:COI declared at . tgeorgescu (talk)  04:23, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Whoever is writing this article is politically motivated and not truthful. I have been unable to correct the misinformation. Jjjerry14 (talk) 14:13, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Legally speaking, since you have a conflict of interest, you should not have been allowed to edit the article anyway. Principally speaking, you do not have the legal right to edit the article. tgeorgescu (talk)  22:00, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP:COI
Talk:Bournbrook

message: Just noticed that roads such as Dawlish, Tiverton, Teignmouth and Exeter are named after towns in Devonshire. What is the historical relevance of this? 87.194.30.164 01:48, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Devonshire 

message: "The now dilapidated building beside the library on the Bristol Road belonged to timber merchants W J Vincent & Co Ltd".  Is that correct?  I thought the place next to the library was the builders' merchant Goodmans, and that Vincents was on the Bristol Road more towards Edgbaston.  Mind you, I was last there in the seventies so my memory may not be reliable. 86.132.223.105 (talk) 12:47, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: My recollection agrees with yours. 109.152.150.174 (talk) 10:58, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vincent/Goodman 

message: Bournbrook as an area doesn't exist in reality. The whole area is covered by Selly Oak and if there is an area called Bournbrook it is certainly a tiny area located around a small segment of the Bristol Road, definitely not as large as this article indicates it to be. -=Troop=- (talk) 19:16, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: You'll not be telling the people who were born that that it doesn't exist, will you!? 31.52.251.160 (talk) 17:39, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Selly Oak
Talk:Express trust

message: I think this page should simply explain the basic premise of an express trust, i.e. that it is a written or oral trust not implied by law. The types of trust (express or otherwise) are dealt with elsewhere (e.g. Trust Law) and the other information here just serves to confuse what is a fairly basic idea. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.231.141.214 (talk • contribs)  on 13 February 2007.
I agree!  This article is rather marble-mouthed.  Perhaps the author took inspiration from the "hide the ball" writing technique that is so prevalent in legal treatises.  It should begin with a simple definition, beginning with "An express trust is..."  Ex0pos (talk) 06:03, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing? 

message: Am a pastor 48 unmarried dad died mother old 75 had two brothers mentally depressed no own house had a debt of 145,500$ help me with this money I will pay my debts get married and continue pastor work and take care of my sick family help me on human grounds please my email address jalajacob77@gmail.com M: 009833377323 Jala jacob (talk) 07:04, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  financial assistance
Talk:Five Ways, Birmingham

message: The link does not work. Alex Holowczak 11:09, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  OS Map 
Talk:Handsworth Wood

message: l;kfgnmjgkluxfbnfsrklmigudtrdtkjluymmmfxjasgveihctttttttg45s
gibberish is when some one is not talkin no sense or when they arenot talkin a proper language  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.45.223.229 (talk) 09:42, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  gibberise
Talk:Harborne

message: Should we add a section on Famous buildings?  I think that there are a number of notables in the area to talk about. Also, should there be a section on Parks and Recreation?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Enock1970 (talk • contribs) 13:58, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Those would be good sections. However, instead of 'Famous buildings', it would be better to have either 'Places of interest' (which could include a sub-section on Parks and recreation) or 'Landmarks'. - Erebus555 (talk) 15:44, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

text: How about a list of places of interest then, Harborne Hall, St Peter's Church, the Bishop's palace, the clock tower centre, Rose Road Fire Brigade station, the Harborne Run, Queens Park and Grove Park? Any more suggestions? - Enock1970 (talk • contribs) 21:35, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If these are prominent buildings and local landmarks then it is fine to include them in the article. Try to provide a paragraph of a few sentences on the buildings and parks. Such as (for buildings) architect, date of construction, alterations to the building and any listed statuses. Similarly for the parks, include info on when it became a park, area covered and any recognitions or awards it may have. I can't really suggest any as I have little knowledge of the area. - Erebus555 (talk) 16:25, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Adding Sections

message: Non-notable primary school Tacyarg (talk) 23:07, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Harborne Primary School]]
Talk:Highgate, Birmingham

message: I've started to tidy-up the edits made by 147.188.228.37, it will be a while before I get a chance to finish this task.  Please do not delete the edits. Aynuk N. Ayli 14:48, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: To stop edit conflicts, you may want to add  to the top of the page. It tells all editors that a user is doing a major edit to the page and so would wish for no one to edit the article until they have finished, which is signalled by the removal of the template. - Erebus555 15:01, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks but I'll be editing this over the next few weeks, the message was primarily aimed at over zealous members of the Counter Vandalism Unit. Aynuk N. Ayli 11:11, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Irish Quarter

message: The Dubliner Pub has been rebuilt. I walked past it today and it was full of people. Teachdubh (talk) 18:43, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. I managed to find a reference for this too so I have updated the article. - Erebus555 (talk) 20:37, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: The Dubliner
Talk:Outline of sociology

message: See the proposal at the Village pump
The Transhumanist 09:26, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename proposal for this page and all the pages of the set this page belongs to 

message: There are at least a couple of articles listed under "Branches of sociology" that are not really branches. They really belong somewhere else, like a list of sociology by country. "Chinese sociology" redirects to Sociology in China. "Contributions to Indian Sociology" is actually the name of a journal, inappropriate for this list. Where should Sociology in China (or any other country) go/ be listed? Thanks, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 21:13, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sociology in ... 

message: Tried to clean up this list: numerous duplicates (some four or more times), redirects, obsolete entries. Several branches erroneously listed in multidisciplinary fields, and a few vice versa. One assumption made in the course of doing so is that, for branches, there should for the most part be one listing per 'branch' only. Does this seem reasonable? Otherwise, there gets to be a lot of redundancy through cross-links. One further step that could be done to verify the listing of branches of sociology would be to compare the present list with the current formally recognized sections within the American Sociological Association. May be some more to add: there are always new sections in formation... Anyway, hope the article is now a little more accurate, streamlined, and up-to-date as a result. DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 21:37, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyediting

message: "Outline" is short for "hierarchical outline". There are two types of outlines: sentence outlines (like those you made in school to plan a paper), and topic outlines (like the topical synopses that professors hand out at the beginning of a college course). Outlines on Wikipedia are primarily topic outlines that serve 2 main purposes: they provide taxonomical classification of subjects showing what topics belong to a subject and how they are related to each other (via their placement in the tree structure), and as subject-based tables of contents linked to topics in the encyclopedia. The hierarchy is maintained through the use of heading levels and indented bullets. See Wikipedia:Outlines for a more in-depth explanation.  The Transhumanist 00:09, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quick explanation of Wikipedia outlines
Talk:The Stranger (Applegate novel)

message: *On the topic of new morphs: Rachel acquired the great horned owl morph in the previous book and presumably used it then as well.  I am not sure this should be included as a new morph.  It is certainly the first time we've seen her in it, but it is not the first time she's done it.
*I fleshed out the summary some more.
192.91.171.36 (talk) 19:25, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
Talk:The Secret (novel)

message: * I added a bit more meat to the summary and hopefully made it more understandable.  I may also later include a "themes/issues" explored section to talk about the problems Cassie was having.  I may actually try to do that for all of the Animorphs books as I reread them.  We'll see.  If anyone wants to help...
192.91.173.36 (talk) 14:45, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
Talk:New Jersey in the American Civil War

message: Um... Anyone else see what I see...? Jersey John (talk) 11:47, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
Talk:32-bit file access

message: Could someone please clarrify the distiction between this and 32-bit Disk Access? The articles as writen do not make this distiction clearly and as result appear redundant. Phatom87 15:40, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification needed 

message: This article and IFSHLP.SYS should be merged, but I'm not in the mood to check the  and  details. -82.113.121.52 (talk) 21:40, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[IFSHLP.SYS]]
Talk:The Change (novel)

message: In the trivia secion is it worth putting that this cover illustrationis a reverse of the illustration on book 3? (this is red-tailed hawk to Tobias, #3 was Tobias to red-tailed hawk)--JG ROX 58.173.10.160 04:03, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lozells

message: Is it LOzulz or LuZELLz? 84.70.122.83 (talk) 22:55, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation
Talk:Variations on a Rococo Theme

message: I know the work was revised by the composer at some point and a few of the variations were reordered, but the section starts off with the flugelhorn version which is a different (and more trivial) adaptation.  Could someone who understands the composer-adaptation better clean this up a bit?  DavidRF 15:42, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adaptations Section is confusing 

message: I am a cellist, and am currently playing the Urtext edition published by Peters Edition, London. The IMSLP "original" full score and cello part differ in several places from this Urtext edition: the IMSLP Variation IV and the final coda after Variation VIII are actually reworkings by Fitzenhagen. This can be clearly seen in the Peters Urtext edition, which prints separately  Tchaikovsky's original and Fitzenhagen's reworking for both these parts. Since the notes on the IMSLP page can't seem to be edited, I thought the next best thing would be to put the notice over here.Piatigorsky (talk) 13:52, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notes regarding external link to "original" score 

message: I'm fairly certain the article is notable, but the lead does not explain why.  Very Average Editor (talk) 18:58, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The lead doesn't explain why this is notable
Talk:Association Forum

message: Merge this article for Association Forum of Chicagoland and redirect this aritcle. Chris 15:43, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Council of Islamic Ideology

message: Human Rights Commission of Pakistan has recommended the abolition of the CII.  http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-36413037  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.52.79.175 (talk) 13:46, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Call for Abolition 
Talk:Lead time

message: Disclaimer: (1) I am the author of the page listed below. (2) My company is selling a supply chain software.
The present quality of the lead time page is low. It literally reads like an advertising for the feature-catalog of some my own competitors.
A more sensical approach to lead times https://www.lokad.com/lead-time that I believe to be worth linking. Naturally, due to the obvious conflict of interest that I have, I will let someone else proceed if deemed relevant. Joannes Vermorel (talk) 09:36, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better overall perspective on lead time? 

message: If anyone disagrees with the changes I made here at around 16:43, February 13th, please contact me on my user talk. Thanks, Bioarchie1234 15:44, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: An example would be scheduling the start of a 2 week activity dependent with the finish of the successor activity with a lead of 2 weeks so they will finish at the same time.
What the fuck is this trying to say?  How does one start an activity dependent with the finish of the successor activity? 121.45.210.174 (talk) 08:50, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Talk

message: The article looks of poor quality to me because the same concept "lead time" has cover related by very distinct problems depending of the industry being considered. Not too sure about what should be done about this very page though.
--Joannes Vermorel (talk) 14:19, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Different meaning for different industries?
Talk:GAZ-12 ZIM

message: What a coincidence! I mean, Gaz AND Zim? Zazaban 15:45, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Old talk

message: Borgward introduced the Hansa 1500 in 1949, and all important publications regarding cars are agreeing that this car was the first mass-produced vehicle featuring the Ponton body.
--2A02:560:42BF:5000:B9EF:2B45:FC4E:595D (talk) 00:37, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The GAZ-M20 Pobeda is a ponton as well. That would date back zu 1946. According to Ponton (car), there are several others from the 1940s and even 1930s. I guess I just delete the sentence here. Regards, --Druschba 4 (talk) 14:55, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sorry...but the Germans were faster
Talk:Ernest Scott

message: Have just been correcting a rather nice review in "The Argus", Melbourne (http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article3819535), of the 1926 Salzburg Festival by one Emily Scott. I wonder if she is Ernest Scott's wife "Emily"? 124.149.191.16 (talk) 09:19, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Dananananaykroyd

message: Just getting a word in before this gets put forward for speedy deletion:
Dananananaykroyd are an up-and-coming Glasgow band receiving copious amounts of airplay and media coverage at the moment. Try a Google search for info. Two 7" singles released thus far, with a reported album in the making. Ask if you need more information.Sackosacko 15:48, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Currently Google reports about 180.000 pages containing the word Dananananaykroyd (and 49 news articles in the last month), so it is quite ridiculous to ask for "help to establish notability". Rps (talk) 06:46, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, they are clearly a legitimate active band.  They were at the SXSW festival in March 2009.  http://sxsw.com/music/shows/schedule/?a=show&s=79142  
Also here is a recent review: http://thequietus.com/articles/01455-dananananaykroyd-hey-everyone-album-review  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.191.175.231 (talk) 17:57, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: Hmmmm, has anyone noticed the debatable genre included in the article for this band? Jodamu (talk) 12:48, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genres 
Talk:New Frankley

message: Frankley: "recently expanded by the Great Park development"? No it wasn't as the Great Park (Morrisons etc) is in Rubery! 194.74.54.58 (talk) 12:47, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

message: Is it still the only civil parish within Birmingham? It appears Sutton Coldfield, on the other side of the city, established a Parish Council of its own in 2016.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:845C:4600:F150:4496:C5BB:9FF1 (talk) 06:09, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Civil parish
Talk:Northfield, Birmingham

message: Come on Brummies living in South West Birmingham those folk in Erdington are defeating us!  Theirs is a much better article, and there is a whole category of articles about Erdington!  Er… Erdington?  I don’t know what to say.  And the snobs of Sutton Coldfield have a very good article and a category too.  Let’s show them we can do better! South Birmingham OK (talk) 17:33, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind that far afield - just compare West Heath, West Midlands to Northfield. 21st CENTURY  GREENSTUFF 18:57, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The article is much better now, well done! South Birmingham OK (talk) 10:39, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The West Heath, West Midlands article is now far inferior to this article and I'm moving over to that one. South Birmingham OK (talk) 11:49, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Has anybody got an idea when this was built  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.42.88.151 (talk) 15:06, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shopping Center
Talk:Perry Barr

message: I'm tagging this article as requiring cleanup. Although there is some reasonable content here, it is very list-like, so needs tidying so that the prose flows and is arranged logically. Cheers, DWaterson 16:24, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: Is there any source for this contention AD Mills' Dictionary of English Place Names (oxford 1991) gives the Pear etymology
Spinney Hill (talk) 11:55, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology