lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Libre (Sébastien Izambard album)

message: I've changed this and other translations of the French titles in Sébastien's album because I believe they were inaccurate. Echec à la Dame in particular was translated to "Failure to the Lady" which just doesn't make any sense. If you read the lyrics to this song you'll find clear references to a game of chess:
Notre amour qui tourne au tournoi (our love become a tournament)
Tes mots sont des petits soldats(your words are small soldiers)
Ivoire, ébène(Ivory, ebony) 
In French, dame is how you refer to the queen in chess and echec is the equivalent to "check". I haven't translated to "Check to the Queen" though cause it sounds weird, it could be confussed with paying a check (bank) to a woman. 
Please do not revert my edits to the French translations again without discussing it first here.Rosa 03:43, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Echec à la dame

message: I'm contesting the claim of authorship by user Rellon to both pics of Sébastien Izambard...please see the discussion page of those two images:  and . Until this issue is resolved please do not add those two pictures to any articles and please discuss here.Rosa 04:19, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyrighted Images 

message: I oppose this article's deletion for two reasons:
1. It's not true this album isn't notable. It was on the French and Canadian charts when released. The artist, Sébastien Izambard, is a very popular singer now and many of his fans are interested in his work previous to Il Divo. 
2. I agree Wikipedia isn't a lyrics database; I already deleted the lyrics added by a previous user. This article is about an album and it's purpose is not merely to show the lyrics of the songs.Rosa 03:05, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Deletion 
Talk:Brother Tony Leyva

message: I agree with the post below me and made some changes. It's an encyclopedia. There are a lot of people in it whose behavior we find disagreeable.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lifeasaperson (talk • contribs) 22:01, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: With no prejudice as to the accuracy of this article, I think it is possible to write it in a neutral tone. The man's crimes are clear enough, we do not have to press the point. Presently the tone is admonishing and vindictive. So, keep to the facts and be encyclopedic. Haiduc 00:17, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Go for it.  ·:· Will Beback  ·:· 20:50, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV tag
Talk:List of introduced bird species

message: I don't think this edit is correct. Invasive Spices (talk) 22:12, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Silver gull Istanbul
Talk:Talk to Me (Joey McIntyre album)

message: HELP!!!!!!!
I thought that this was going to be a simple update, I tried to read as much information as I could to upload this information correctly. I know that I've messed up a few things and I've been here for hours. First off,  I can't get the album cover photo that I uploaded to show up in the actual page I created, it seems to be on a page of it's own?   
As the creator of the work I released the album cover (websized file) to WIKIPEDIA, and public domain. 
I stated so when I  uploaded the files, yet it appears I need to send in some kind of form still? This is a bit confusing or my photo will be deleted?
 Last but not least, my whole point was to have this information page link to an  existing WIKIPEDIA page on Joey McIntyre. So that the most current information on his new release, "TALK TO ME" could be posted in WIKIPEDIA.
I didn't use my actual name to sign in-- I used my sisters NAME after reading about the possibility of generating more spam than I already receive. 
If anyone has any help or suggestions on the, Talk to Me,  page that I've just created it would be GREATLY appreciated. I deeply apologize for making more work for someone else to edit.
cheers, 
help!!!!
melissa kingsmill
-
roxann arwen mills
roxannarwen.mills@gmail.com
03:55, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Michelle Paver

message: needs more infoKGV 10:59 pm, 28 January 2007, Sunday (6 years, 3 months, 23 days ago) (UTC−5)
dear grant and jason there themost haunted aslym in indiana called orpannnage aslymsaid at least hundred children sprit there.  millhelle please tell ghost hunter .  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.248.0.45 (talk) 00:42, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Jan Hanlo

message: This article fails to even explain what the author's works were nor how much he is actually "known for his works". Sources, anyone? — Scientizzle 16:30, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: He seems plenty notable... but, that's from my reading of the Dutch article.  I think it should be kept since it will someday be expanded... language barrier means notable non-English speakers get less attention than internet memes of minor importance. gren グレン 22:04, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: He was an important poet in 1950's Dutch language. Well known poem e.g. "De Mus (the sparrow)" and "Oote". Arnoutf (talk) 11:51, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Montres allison

message: Just wanted to respond to the author of the article who accuses me of having an axe to grind against the company (which I now assume the author is affiliated with). I don't. And I have *never* authored a post on any message board about the firm, nor do I know anyone who has. The only reason I took up editing the page was that I had read of the firm on Google groups, looked it up on wikipedia, and found what appeared to be an advertisement for the firm. I figured that editing the page would be a fun and easy first wikipedia project. Information on the company is pretty widely available, and I tried to be neutral by citing criticisms of the company and its proprietors as well as the company's own press releases. I encourage other editors to look at my earlier versions of the article. I definitely want to become a positive contributor to wikipedia, so any advice you all have for me would be more than welcome. As for this individual wanting to get a hold of my IP address, this is worrisome and a little threatening. I think deletion of the page would be good for everybody-- the author would no longer need to worry about negative information about the company being on wikipedia, and the encyclopedia's standards for neutrality and notability would be satisfied.--Newt43 04:00, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Jean Succar Kuri

message: This is a case of WP:EVENT and based on the charge against the subject. The second paragraph tried to mask this intent but has no references. This should be deleted.--JAMillerKC (talk) 17:16, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not notable
Talk:David Loriya

message: Just for future reference, this player was offered to a lot of clubs in :Israel by agents making claims that he was :Jewish and would not count as a foreigner in the :Israeli Premier League. Here is the source for when :F.C. Ashdod found out that he wasn't Jewish and ineligible to join the club as a domestic player. -NYC2TLV (talk) 02:27, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  David Loria is not Jewish 
Category talk:Baltimore Canaries players

message: There are 38 players on the alltime (1871-73) roster for this club, 24 player pages now listed in the category. 
Most of the missing played less than one-half full seasons. The exception is Johnny Ryan (baseball), evidently overmatched but he played every game in 1874. P64 (talk) 06:26, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: alltime roster
Category talk:Baltimore Marylands players

message: There are 19 players on the alltime NA roster for this club (1873) and 5 player pages listed in the category. 
One of the missing played all six of the team's league games, Henry Kohler. Only two men played all six. P64 (talk) 06:36, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: alltime NA roster
Talk:Children Shouldn't Play With Dead Things (Supernatural)

message: Instead of arguing on the page itself, take it to discussions.  It's really kind of stupid to see responses, "yes actually she did" blah blah blah.  If you want to discuss (or in this case argue) something, do it on the discussion page please. -Emhilradim 04:06, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unneccessary Argument on the Page itself

message: Or maybe it's just me...
* The brothers don't take Lindsey with them for protection after Angela's initial attack. Chances are she would've returned to finish the job.
* Dean doesn't shoot the door at Angela when meeting with Neil. It wouldn't have taken her out but she'd have been shot up enough to just carry her to the cemetery or something.
* Angela cracks Neil's neck pretty quickly, but takes her time with Sam so that Dean can shoot her ass.
And that's about it.
:Wiki is not the place to document grievances with plot lines unless you're a noteworthy television critic. - Debuskjt 15:38, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stupid stuff
Category talk:Cincinnati Kelly's Killers players

message: Shouldn't this category be "Cincinnati Porkers players" to match the wiki page, which is Cincinnati Porkers? -Dewelar (talk) 00:05, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Cincinnati Porkers has been moved to Cincinnati Kelly's Killers per discussion [] -Dewelar (talk) 16:51, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cincinnati Porkers
Talk:Robert Siboldi

message: Perdon que lo moleste sr. Siboldi me gustaria saber si el equipo del club Tijuana (xolos) en algun momento tendra oh llevara a cabo visorias o tryouts para adolecentes,, mi hijo tiene 16 años, juega desde los 5, primero como delantero luego portero medio lateral y ahorita es medio central vivimos en USA juega para los Titans Black division U17 Oro y esta buscando una oportunidad en cualquier equipo Profesional su meta es ser un jugador de 1ra division y llegar a ser un buen doctor (cruzo mis dedos para que asi sea) cualquier informacion esta mas que agradecida, imagino que usted no es el responsible de dar este tipo de info. Pero bueno veamos que pasa. 2600:1012:B152:A38A:C9EF:A8F1:8C03:DF61 (talk) 00:48, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Visorias
Category talk:Cincinnati Red Stockings players

message: I went ahead and removed the statement about the Boston Red Stockings being a precursor of the Cincinnati Red Stockings, in fact the Boston team was the precursor to the Atlanta Braves.Neonblak talk -  05:30, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmmm...I thought I'd made it clear that I was differentiating from the 1882-1890 Cincinnati Red Stockings, but perhaps not. I'll try again. -Dewelar (talk) 05:35, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: My mistake, I am clearly seeing things that aren't there.Neonblak talk -  05:42, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No worries. If you see it, there might be others who see it as well, so best to make it as clear as possible. -Dewelar (talk) 05:49, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect Information

message: Other players listed by Marshall Wright for 1869 or 1870
* Atwater, 1870 of, p
All others now have pages. Atwater doesn't get a red link. P64 (talk) 20:20, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: coverage
Talk:Shubert Theatre (New Haven)

message: I've removed the following sentence from the article: "It was the second theatre built by the Shubert Organization, after the Shubert Theatre on Broadway, and its full original name was Sam S. Shubert Theatre." I know this information is from the theater's official website, but the problem is that Sam S. Shubert died in 1905, at which time the Shuberts had already begun building theaters. See the quotes from 1905 newspaper articles about the construction of the Shubert Theatre in Kansas City here: Somebody needs to do some research at some location other than the New Haven theater's website. Maybe one or another of the books about the Shuberts (one was written a few years ago by Foster Hirsch) would be useful- I've been unable to lay my hands on any of them, though. Whyaduck 04:16, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  False claim from theater's official website
Talk:Stella Awards

message: i wrote that myself.  i just looked at the page and i was that you are correct and it does appear to be a copy.  i will re-write it.
Yakatz 04:20, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for helping keep Wikipedia free from copyright violations! -- Butseriouslyfolks 04:32, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it is all better now.  Yakatz 05:02, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The Speedy delete should be removed if the copyvio has been corrected, since there are numerous versions of Stella Awards with published reliable and independent sources, in addition to the sources presently linked. Apparently Randy Cassingham is the creator of the "True Stella " awards. Edison 06:57, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright

message: According to whom is the Pearson case an example of such a Stella Award? Has this case actually been featured by the originator of this "award"? Or is this someone's opinion? If this inclusion can be cited, so be it, otherwise it is original research and should be reverted as such. Ryanjunk 18:24, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Related" cases 

message: I think the article does not (yet) provide a balanced view of the subject. Provided the subject of the article is notable enough, why are there not enough citations? Is the Award not criticized in the media? Kushal 17:04, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that the neutrality could be helped substantially if some quotes were added around certain passages (the last sentence of the first paragraph "The Stella Award is given to people who file outrageous and frivolous lawsuits.[1]" for instance) to show that these are direct quotes from the website and not the opinion of the page author.  Deleteyourself16 (talk) 14:39, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality dispute 

message: Even if it was just a simple cup of coffee, the fact that it caused third degree burns kinda implies that lawsuit wasn't particularly "frivolous".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.74.197.80 (talk) 12:51, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  3rd degree burns? 

message: Article lacks notability and reliable sources, vote for delete. --0pen$0urce (talk) 11:50, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The article is well cited in multiple locations and is notable due to the reason for the award, vote to retain.Wzrd1 (talk) 00:09, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Lacks Notability, sources
Talk:Dungeonscape

message: So it seems WotC has decided to reuse the name of this book as the name for the new online tools for 5th Edition. So there may be a need for this article to be moved for disambiguation purposes. Of course, this presumes that the 5e Dragonscape tools deserve an article, but I am pretty confident that they will be notable enough for one. That said, 5th edition is not absolutely dependent on an online character creator, the way 4th Edition often was in practice if not in theory. oknazevad (talk) 23:53, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Nevermind. It was canceled shortly after I wrote that first comment. Apparently it wasn't up to snuff. oknazevad (talk) 13:29, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Online tools
Talk:Open Market

message: what is the relationship between IPO and open market —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.82.73.194 (talk • contribs) 29 January 2007
What do you mean, exactly?  Can you be more specific with your question? Weopgon 22:22, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There needs to be two separate wiki entries. One for the publically traded Open Market (OMKT) and another for the mobile messaging company OpenMarket Inc. (www.openmarket.com). Mmyo78 (talk) 18:39, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  OpenMarket Inc. vs Open Market 

message: The company is named Open Market, not OpenMarket, and therefore I renamed the article. See the for example http://news.cnet.com/Open-Market-acquires-Future-Tense/2100-1017_3-228444.html and http://news.cnet.com/Open-Market-acquires-Future-Tense/2100-1017_3-228444.html 2pem (talk) 10:56, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renamed article to Open Market 
Talk:William Beckford (novelist)

message: The link to John Farquhar has no relation to Beckford. Should the brackets - i.e. - the live link - be removed? teneriff 02:25, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The term "profligate" is usually applied to sexual behavior, not to collection of paintings.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maclennan123 (talk • contribs) 18:27, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: No it isn't. PiCo (talk) 05:29, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

text: Indeed no. Johnbod (talk) 12:59, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terminology 

message: :
I guess "before the sale" is a remnant of a former conception of the sentence?  I'll look up the history later. —Tamfang (talk) 02:52, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  sold before the sale? 

message: I can see that this is going to be a long debate on wiki.
British-owned plantations in Jamaica were all ‘slave-worked’, so the mention is redundant. You might as well add that it was malaria and typhoid ridden. Equally, to define Beckford in the lede as a ‘slave-owner’ is like classifying one of today’s better-off businessmen as a ‘yacht-owner’. It is simply not notable enough.
To retain credibility, I think the diversity/equality lobby should confine their mentions of slave-owning to those cases where it was an issue of special importance and interest in the career of that particular individual. Valetude (talk) 16:16, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slave-ownership
Category talk:Philadelphia Athletics (NL) players

message: Probably the 1871-76 players pages should be categorized together rather than split in two. 
Thirteen 1871-76 Athletics played for the 1876 team only. Five of them have pages now in this PA(NL) category: Doc Bushong, Flip Lafferty, Nealy Phelps, Fred Warner (baseball), George Zettlein. Eight of them have no pages: William Coon, Bill Fouser, Whitey Ritterson, John Curran, Lou Paul, John Bergh, Jim Ward (baseball), John Mullen (baseball).
Three of the six teams that span 1875/76 (Chicago, Hartford, New York) are already represented by one player category and three are represented by two overlapping categories (Boston, Philadelphia, St. Louis). P64 (talk) 18:14, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: 1871-75 and 1876
Talk:Loro Boriçi

message: Removed photo of Shyqyri Ballgjini, based on input from well known sports journalist, Enver Tonuzi. Mjeshtrisportit (talk) 16:08, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Enver Tonuzi's input 
Talk:Joe L. Kincheloe

message: A full professsor at Mc Gill is notable  & a holder of a Canada Research Chair even more notable.DGG 04:37, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The Resources section seems to be a good collection of references that could be incorporated into text as inline citations. The section itself could be pared and eventually removed as these edits were made. The see also section is too long. One of to could be noteworthy. If the Kinchloe was involved in the fields, that could be noted in the body text and links to those fields made in-line. More references are needed to support the Infobox sections on influences and influencers. --papageno (talk) 14:52, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestions for Improvement 

message: The above entry lacks conformity to NPOV standards.  I suggest more targeted suggestions for future discussion relating to specific edits, relevant information, and article organization. 
Vektoar (talk) 00:37, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Response to Above Entry (Suggestions for Improvement)

message: I'm just surfing by but have found things elsewhere that make me think I want to know what Joe Kincheloe had to say.  But I can't understand this, it's all inbred gobbledygook.  Surely teachers want to reach widest?
Maybe it's the way he himself talked?  Reading a review at Amazon:
- - - snip - - -
This book exemplifies why I tend to stay away from "critical studies" (or whatever academic current this represents). Written by a professor in an obscure vocabulary that reeks of self-appointed elitism, it develops a convoluted argument against McDonald's as a cultural force that is subverting the polticial process in America and even the world. He claims that a burger is not just a burger, but instead eating one is a political act and even a religious ritual without offering anything in support of such claims except his weird academic discipline.
While I find much of value in such radical critiques as No Logo or Fast Food Nation, which in spite of their excesses explore very worthy questions, this book is simply off the deep end. Even worse, though the author claims he has done field research in conversations with people queueing at McDonald's, the book is really pure academic indulgence in the form of an incestuous group that reads and supports each others' writing - and perpetuates a common vacabulary.
These views are so outrageously silly and incoherent that it is hard to believe someone can make a living by writing - and teaching - about it. 
[...]
I wish I could say that I learned something useful from this book, but I didn't. Instead, I waded through such phrases as: "When consumers are in hermeneutic freefall, they are set up for advertisers poised to insert corporate consumption values into the vacuum left by the dissolution of previous beliefs." If this guy is trying to connect to the public, he's got a LONG way to go.
- - - snip - - -
Dude, vacabulary.  Kinda perfect I think.  But so hard to figure in a guy who wrote blues lyrics.
108.225.235.201 (talk) 21:38, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dude, the vacabulary
Category talk:Washington Nationals (NA) players

message: Baseball databases commonly distinguish the 1872 and 1875 clubs.
Among the thirteen players with pages, which are all now in this category, six played only for the 1872 team (Bielaski, Glenn, Hines, Miler, White, Yeatman); four played only for the 1875 team (Allison, Brady, Doscher, Parks); three played for both teams (Hollingshead, Lennon, Stearns). P64 (talk) 18:20, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: 1872 and 1875
Talk:Welch, West Virginia

message: I can not believe that nothing is written in these documentations about Jeannette Walls, who wrote the book "The Glass Castle." Her book is incredible. It is true. Most of her growing up years were in Welch. She shares many details about it. It is a book well worth reading.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.231.83.231 (talk) 04:37, 29 January 2007(UTC) 
The book sucks. All of it is lies.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.216.137.79 (talk) 21:13, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Jeannette Walls

message: Census from 2000 is described in detail  How about an update? Kdammers (talk) 03:41, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Census
Talk:Michiharu Mishima

message: What happened with this guy during WWII?  — Rlevse • Talk •  14:32, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: WWII
Talk:All the Shah's Men

message: "The fact (stated at the end of the book) that US companies were granted the majority of the oil concessions from the Shah's government after the coup, does not feature significantly in the earlier part of the narrative. However, that this was the chief reason for the coup is the tacit conclusion of the book."
This "tacit conclusion" statement seems like opinion, rather than a serious assessment or criticism.
It should also be noted that in the new forward in the 2008 edition of this book, the author explicitly states that the "real reason" for overthrowing Mossadegh and installing a pro-Western government was to create a vassal state and extract Iranian petroleum.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by CLSwiki (talk • contribs) 20:52, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The summary omits the very pertinent fact that the PM staged a coup of his own, forcing the Shah out of the country.  He was no longer the legal or elected PM.  The countercoup by royalists and the military restored the shah.  The description currently is very misleading.  Is this based on the book?203.184.41.226 (talk) 19:43, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tacit conclusion? 