Talk:Spin polarization

message: ----
Can someone insert numbers about the efficiency:
* How many electrons are scattered with in the gold
* What is the typical Sherman function
[http:\\www.uni-muenster.de/Physik.PI/Hanne/Pol/Pol-2.pdf] possible_source]
Arnero 08:23, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

message: This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 10:03, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating

message: Entanglogravitational Spring
----------------------------
entanglogravitatioal theory demands from all particles be partially entangled, even with virtual particles,
and very few one to one absolutely entangled -but that is rare.
The angular momentums of that ensembles, act like a spring,
that forces all particles aligning with more accuracy their mean
angular momentum by killing virtual particles.
So gravity slays space, therefore virtual particles of the partially entangled groups.
The energy of the dead particles is transformed to speed, that's why gravity
attracts things, but also partial that entanglement's degradation generates heat because of entropy.
We know that speed is angular momentum from particle measurments.
A particle alone has a rotating spin to all possible angles.
It is like a fan, but with a more delicate rotational mode.
If you want to cut your finger by a fast fan, you have to interact
with it, and touch it at some degrees. So you the observer define
the degrees of touching, but a different observer may touch the same particle at different degrees, without 
changing it's fundamental properties, only
the data we record namely spin polarization.
What we choose is the angle of measurement, what we do not know is
if it spins possitively or negatively to the directon we randomly selected. Also, if we twist the particle
there is a probabilistic chart of how much spin gets affected.
We can though affect the measured spin data, if we measure twice,
without tilting the measuring apparatus, only by moving the device at a secondary measurement
at a fraction of the light speed so it gets noticeable.
We use a chart of how spin gets affected by a moving detector at different speeds during measurements.
Dark matter is degrading partial entanglements
but the virtual partially entangled particles probabilistically are annihilated at a predictable
within a statistic range rates.
Dark energy requires vast regions afar from real particle huge accumulations like galaxies
and glactic flocks.
Quantum noise of vast voids exceeds the relativistic death of particles,
therefore we have a runaway universe because dark energy seems to win the game at the grandest scales.
This is entanglogravity, or Entanglemential degradating gravity.
Most scientists connect mathematically entanglogravity
with chromatogravity.
Chromodynamic Gravity = Chromatogravity = Chromogravity
Remember, the average spin of a group should cancel,
also small partially entangled spin groups, are connected in bigger groups.
The particles that form a group at each "quantum frame" change.
So not the exact same particles of a Planck scaled region cancel each other all the time,
this is a chromodynamical probabilistic effect, and the larger the scale [more afar from Planck sizes]
the more stable the group linkages are.
Tiny Planck scale entalogravitational groups, tend to exchange partners.
---------------
Gravitons are not unknown.
Gravitons are normal real and virtual standard model partially entangled particles
(also very few absolute binary entangled ones)
which belong to groups that change probabilistically at every averagingally beholded frame of action
[we have to average near beholder's opinions]  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.84.204.228 (talk) 00:20, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Entanglogravitational Spring - Partially Entangled  Degrading Groups