lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:History of the Republic of Turkey

message: I think that this article should be renamed "Republican history of Turkey" in line with Economic history of Turkey or Consitutional history of Turkey. What do others think? Baristarim 14:01, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Republic of Turkey is the name of the country itself. --Mugsywwiii 03:55, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Agree that the article should be renamed. But I think the appropriate name should be History of the Republic of Turkey, this mirrors the name of many "History of the Republic of ..." articles in Wikipedia (see ). History of Turkey should include more ancient history, for instance, the Ottoman Empire. LK (talk) 08:29, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  I agree with you. Kavas (talk) 12:42, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  I have moved it as there's no objection. Kavas (talk) 22:31, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Renaming

message: The quote in reference 9 makes no grammatical sense. This makes me think it is either a misquote or mistranslation. 2A02:C7D:86B:4A00:1C53:B14C:9DF7:E656 (talk) 09:15, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference 9
Talk:HTML

message: At the very start of the article, it says that HTML is an acronym for "HyperText Markup Language". Should "HyperText" be changed to "Hypertext"? It seems that it is the more common capitalization of the word. Is there an official capitalization of the word, or are they both valid? Superscooper123talk 23:49, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm pretty sure It's four different words, like this: Hyper Text Markup Language. Nice user2 (talk) 23:20, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

text: HyperText is a better one because T is capital in HTML Spanking710 (talk) 05:41, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Hypertext or HyperText?

message: where in index.html does search code need to be placed to attract users 203.144.68.65 (talk) 04:15, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  topping google search list for "AUCTION" and what and where search meta data needs to be placed in wesite code 

message: Everyone is saying HTML 1.0 was released in 1991 but actually in 1991 Tim Berners-Lee took on the role of creator for HTML 1.0 and produced a program called WorldWideWeb in 1991 that later changed to Nexus.
1993 marked the introduction of HTML 1.0. At that point, only a few developers have been working on building the website 
Here is the source that verifies my claim
https://spankingsolutions.com/history-of-html/
Spanking710 (talk) 05:53, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  HTML 1.0 was released in 1993 not in 1991 

message: And all other things that are in my mind and the upstream documentation is a setup process. 
At the same time I was just curious about the window 10-5 and how it could work with the new content 41.122.11.57 (talk) 12:54, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Windows 11 and  HTMLLock 

message: The article got vandalized with information about some rapper 68.146.42.107 (talk) 09:28, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Got vandalized
Talk:Homeschooling

message: What do you think about moving "According to Elizabeth Bartholet, surveys of homeschoolers show that a majority of homeschoolers in the USA are motivated by "conservative Christian beliefs, and seek to remove their children from mainstream culture"." with updated sourcing to criticism? E. Bartholet is a vocal critic of homeschooling and her writings maybe considered biased.Barbie1979 (talk) 05:59, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The entire article otherwise has to have been written by people willing to extrapolate very limited research. A lot of the referenced being used are from advocacy groups, or corporations that have learning tools to sell. Critics can't be dismissed simply by them having a critical opinion, that's already understood. Compare it to homeopathy maybe, there's many critical voices on the practice, yet they are taken fully seriously on Wiki. Despite being biased. You could start by demonstrating why you think that her writings aren't good, and not just that she disagrees with you.  ~~ Kameloso (talk) 01:16, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Biased?
Talk:House of Hohenzollern

message: Aren't the rulers of Liechtenstein still Hohenzollerns? --corvus13
-------------------
I don't you .Check http://www.webtop.com , I have to leave. user:H.J.
------------------
I do "you" -- the family name of the rulers of Liechtenstein is "Liechtenstein". They've been around for ages -- since the 12th century, I think -- mostly because of their impressive ability to look completely inoffensive when necessary. Kind of like a hedgehog. -- Paul Drye
------------------
No relationship. Have a good day!--Jacob Barsimson talk  06:26, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: House of Liechtenstein

message: House of Hohenzollern#Counts of Hohenzollern (1204–1575)
For example:
* 1488–1512: Eitel Friedrich II (c. 1452–1512), son of
* 1512–1525: Eitel Friedrich III (1494–1525), son of
* 1525–1575: Charles I (1516–1576), son of
The list should contain the following minimum information: Name, reign, relationship with predecessor, birth and death.--Mr. Boston (talk) 10:39, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:   How should a list without portraits look like? 

message: I think that we should follow the conventions on the discussion page for historical names?  Since many, if not most, English speakers aren't as familiar with German  history before the end of hte Weimar Republic, I think it would be best to put the name and "of Place", like Albert (or Albrecht) Achilles of Brandenburg, or Friedrich Wilhelm II of Prussia (or Frederick William -- it's hard to say, because more recent sources use the German names, but 50 years ago, they used English -- on the other hand, Karl der Grosse is ALWAYS Charlemagne, and Louis the Pious is never Ludwig the Pious or der Fromme!).  Let's see what the others have to say, and maybe look at each one individually -- because there will always be exceptions, like Frederick the Great (well-known in English).  JHK
:English names make more sense. Sir Tony Britton (talk) 03:36, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Historical names

message: In this revision https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=House_of_Hohenzollern&type=revision&diff=1065576008&oldid=1065550699 I added a family tree. I want a family tree in this article that adequately shows the relationship of the Protestant and Catholic Branches. How can we properly cite such a tree? MaitreyaVaruna (talk) 20:34, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The reason it was removed was that you didn't provide a source for any of this. We cite it by pointing to your source. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 21:07, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  It is created from the infoboxes on all the individual articles, plus the tree in List of monarchs of Prussia. What would the proper format for citation be in this case? Also pardon the moving around of the conversation. I believe something in the tree made me unable to reply and it was unintentionally locked. MaitreyaVaruna (talk) 18:03, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Family Tree
Talk:List of historical films set in Near Eastern and Western civilization

message: Can someone add An American Haunting since this took place during the Bell Witch haunting? DynastiNoble (talk) 21:24, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  An American Haunting (2005) 

message: Can anyone explain why we have separate lists and not a universal one?
Why should there be a list of asian historical films and Western/Near Eastern historical films, but not american historical films?
Why isn't there a list of african historical movies?
Or an australian one?—Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiManiacul (talk • contribs) 01:40, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think that this is intentional Eurocentrism, but it is an awkward classification. The "Near East" is a largely outdated and very vague (Are the former Ottoman lands in Europe included?, North Africa?, Muslim Spain?) term; it also overlaps with Asia, which is on another list. I don't see a reason why there isn't just one list, or a list by century. Uness232 (talk) 11:37, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Racism or Eurocentrism?
Talk:House of Habsburg

message: "Even so, he viewed himself as German, and once wrote to Napoleon III "Nein, ich bin ein Deutscher Fürst"."
He never said that as it is misattributed,the proof being in German Wikiquote.
I can translate the relevant part, here:
Falsely attributed:
    "Sir, I am a German prince." - allegedly on 12th of August 1908 in Ischl to Edward VII of England when the latter tried to dissuade him from his alliance with the German Empire, e.g. in: Walter Wiltschegg: Österreich, der "zweite deutsche Staat"?: der nationale Gedanke in der Ersten Republik, Stocker, 1992, p. 41.
    The quotation was already used spelled that way in the Reichsrat on 16th of July 1907 with a very vague reference to its origin. Q: Stenographic Protocols - House of Representatives - Minutes of Sessions. House of Representatives - 14th Session of the XVIIIth Session on 16 July 1907, p. 1337 (alex.onb.ac.at)
    In the spelling "Sire, I am a German prince" with direct reference to Franz Joseph ("a still living Austrian emperor"), but without reference to an event, the quotation occurs in connection with engagements of the imperial family in non-German parts of the monarchy in an article of the "Deutsches Nordmährerblatt", which was confiscated and is therefore reproduced in a parliamentary question to the Minister of Justice. Q: Stenographic Records - House of Representatives - Minutes of Sessions, House of Representatives, 331st Session of the XVIIth Session on 12 May 1905, p. 29465 (alex.onb.ac.at)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Brat Forelli (talk • contribs) 21:39, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Falsely Attributed Quote 

message: There may be a few duplicates now. 'Count of Holland' appears at least 4 times in the list, for example. 2A02:A462:7C5:1:90C9:2E53:96FF:1776 (talk) 13:05, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you, I think I have managed to trim them all. DuncanHill (talk) 13:03, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diplicates in the list of titles 

message: Even though consort titles do not exert the same level of power as suo jure rule, it's still relevant historically, as well as exerting minimal political power by establishing formal alliances, while also cementing the Habsburgs' legacy of various crowns. Nknka (talk) 15:03, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should Consort Titles be Attributed to the List?
Talk:Hanseatic League

message: There are mistakenly the CoA of Stendal with the town of Uelzen  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harmen Ströntistel (talk • contribs) 20:00, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coat Of Arms Uelzen 

message: The list of ports includes Kaunas but the country of Lithuania is not listed under the ‘Today part of’ section. 2A02:C7C:6521:8300:2859:9706:A10:14D8 (talk) 07:39, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lithuania
Talk:History of Christianity

message: I would especially like to thank  SanctumRosarium for their persistence and aid of the best kind. Thanx to your timely assistance, all that is left now is checking images for alt descriptions and copyright info, and going over all the references for any w/o page #s. I note that there are a few of those left, and if there is some good reason, it should be posted. At least I think that's possible! I'll check! If not, we will have to find other sources. This is one of those truly tedious detail types of work that I hate but is so necessary for the quality editors expect of an FA article. If you are willing to continue with me to the end, I think - I hope - we will see the benefits of our work. Thank you again! Jenhawk777 (talk) 20:42, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: SanctumRosarium Well that comment shows how much I knew last December! Comments from peers at FA said the article was too western biased to ever make FA, so it had to be rewritten yet again. There are few secondary sources, and even fewer original sources on the East, but I did my best to provide as balanced and thorough a picture as possible. It is now close to 13,000 words. If you feel like walking across coals yet another time, please take a look and see if you can suggest edits that would shorten content without losing the thoroughness other editors have insisted FA requires. I've been working on this article for two years now. It's about to kill me. Any comment will be appreciated. Jenhawk777 (talk) 03:11, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  With gratitude 

message: When something in one section of an article is mentioned in another section, should it be referenced somehow? How? The investiture controversy is mentioned in the early Middle Ages but not actually discussed until the high Middle Ages. Jenhawk777 (talk) 18:40, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question
Talk:Hate site

message: If one exists, so must the other. If we list sites considered "anti-hate," then, in order to be balanced, we must list "hate" sites. Or we could have neither, which may be preferable, especially if this will start an edit war. Autopilots 05:09, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Links 

message: Hello, this is a funny hate site about turks and sometimes about jews.
http://www.ian.cc/inicio.php
It's written in Spanish, my language.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.136.154.175 (talk) 20:48, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another hate site to be added to the list. 

message: Hey,
I'm having trouble rewriting the definition of this article to make sense and would like some help. In order to prevent any bias, I would like to propose a completely hypothetical and unrealistic (and therefore bias-free) thought experiment in order to come to a conclusion about the best wording.
Imagine if you could, a set of people who concieve a group of words as gibberish, while another set considers them to be perfectly intelligable. Niether group is right or wrong; the first uses the term gibberwocky to refer to it; the second group, the term Languish. If we had an article on gibberwocky, that stated it's objective form as such: "Gibberwocky is language percieved to be gibberish", would we then word the article Gibberworky website, "A Gibberwocky website is a website that uses gibberwocky", even if it is a site created by the second group? This seems somewhat silly when I word it like this, but adding the term percieve to the website article also seems redundant given the definition. Any thoughts?
I apoliogise if people think I am joking, but I am quite serious. I asked 3 other Wikipedians in person and all I got was biased responses about hate speech, so consider purely the hypothetical, because it's language here, and not the topics that are important. - Jimmi Hugh (talk) 17:39, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition
Talk:HavenCo

message: With Sealand! Honestly, though the company is notable, I don't think its that important. - Ta bu shi da yu 11:22, 1 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  I think this needs merging 

message: Are the data servers actually located on Sealand? And if so, how is the bandwidth transferred from Sealand? Was a cable laid from the UK? Wireless? Satellite?
--Dogbreathcanada 08:27, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Server Location and Cabling 

message: The link to the DefCon presentation is broken... what should we do?
Also, someone really needs to follow up and find out what happened to HavenCo... if it's dead, that should be mentioned in the article. -- Skyfaller 23:45, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it's "original research" so it can't quite be in the article, but I have a server there and it's still running. It did not go down during the fire. The data center wasn't affected (apparently...). Jebba 00:11, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken link 

message: I don't think the Stephenson connection is all that coincidental- considering he knows a number of the Cypherpunks personally (see Ian Goldberg) and some of the principals were in the same social groups!  brain 23:57, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neal Stephenson 

message: According to http://securityandthe.net/2008/11/18/havenco-data-center-offline/ the main HavenCo website has been down for a while.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mavink (talk • contribs) 21:38, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  HavenCo rumored to be down 

message: The article begins, "HavenCo Limited is a legal data haven..."  This is present tense, but I can find nothing that confirms the continued operation of HavenCo beyond 2008.  Should this article not be updated to reflect that . If it were to return it is a fact that Chris Harrington and Ryan Lackey are owed significant funds and have capital available to stop any business. It is also relatively simple if you know how to put Sealand back in the sea. Would you want to invest in that? FergusV9S (talk) 04:28, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  HavenCo gone? 

message: if you'd like to make this article decent, see this book. Doug Weller talk 16:14, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. Unfortunately, most of the section you linked to is unavailable for preview because of too many previews. But I'd be interested in reading it when the preview block goes away. -- The Anome (talk) 20:57, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Great source 

message: Would the article benefit from the addition of an early logo? I saved a logo from the Havenco web page back in the early 2000's, would this be of use to the article? It's the black/red cross version, not the platform logo from the later designs. I'm not sure about re-use rights, as the company was (I presume) based in the Sealand domain and may or may not have a reciprocal agreement with regard to image re-use in other countries.
Mongoosander (talk) 21:04, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early logo
Talk:Timeline of Polish history

message: I would like to remove battles from this timeline, since listing them would make this timeline too detailed (and we don't even have all the wars listed).  I would like to keep only the following:  Legnica and Varna, because of the death of a monarch, as well as the most famous battles in Polish history: Grunwald, Vienna, and Warsaw (1920).  Hope this works for everyone. Appleseed 03:17, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Battles
Talk:History of science

message: I thought the article for heliocentrism is in need of more detailed content. As written, it seems to miss the impact of Copernicus' contribution. I added some suggested citations to improve the content. King of the Changes (talk) 13:50, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heliocentrism suggestion 

message: When the picture of Adenine structure is opened (Advances in Genetics section), the detailed description states that it is Thymine as opposed to Adenine. Is this a discrepancy? Zhedeye (talk) 16:02, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Description for Adenine picture 

message: The Chinese Records of the Grand Historian#Sima Qian's historiography contain Sima Qian's device for recording negative information over the dynasties. Joseph Needham's Science and Civilisation in China records the scientific skill of the scholar bureaucrats in hydraulics when they were constructing the great waterworks of China over thousands of years. --Ancheta Wis    (talk  | contribs) 07:28, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: @Ancheta Wis Hydraulic engineering in China was certainly something that existed by the Warring States Period, though it is clear that the application of the waterwheel to various mechanical wonders was not a thing until about the 1st century BC during the Western Han period. Don't worry, though, the China section might be disorganized and lacking at the moment, but I am planning a near total rewrite soon and will probably start a draft today. Very recently I completely rewrote the abysmal section on "China and East Asia" in the related science in the ancient world sibling sub-article to this one. I also added entirely new sections on Pre-Columbian Mesoamerica in both this main article and that sub-article; more information is desperately needed on Zapotecs and Mayas, as well as Mixtecs and Aztecs who aren't even mentioned yet. Aside from that, you can expect a largely rewritten section on ancient and Imperial China coming soon, with smaller mentions of medieval Korea, Japan, and Vietnam as well (since their scientific traditions were based on China's). Pericles of AthensTalk 17:16, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Science of hydraulics
Talk:Hydrocodone

message: I've removed the prominent lede sentence and info box references to those brand names, which the average layman has never heard of, and replaced them with the well known brands Norco and Vicodin. all sources remained intact (there was no need to replace them). Wikipedia is not a free advertising platform for pharmaceutical companies. Firejuggler86 (talk) 23:40, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Those brand names are combinations. The infobox for this article should list the brand names for the single medication. The prominence doesn't seem relevant. The AHFS Monograph lists Hysingla ER, Zohydro ER. --Whywhenwhohow (talk) 04:32, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

text: There is a separate article for the combination Hydrocodone/paracetamol --Whywhenwhohow (talk) 04:57, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article was being used to advertise the latest patented-formulation brand names (Clarification: NOT necessarily intentionally on the editor's part)
Talk:Seppuku

message: — Assignment last updated by Dslaym (talk) 13:57, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

message: The article currently makes the dubious claim that "Harakiri ... would only be assigned as a punishment towards acts deemed too heinous for seppuku." Do we have the slightest evidence in Japanese sources for this?  AFAIK in Japan no legal distinction was ever made been the two. Jpatokal (talk) 07:10, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Harakiri as distinct punishment from seppuku 

message: — Assignment last updated by Lindseybean28 (talk) 21:24, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: College Composition II
Talk:Hypnotherapy

message: — Assignment last updated by Hkhan11 (talk) 00:19, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Psychology Capstone

message: There is some question as to whether the "uses" section is appropriately demarcating how hypnotherapy is actually used. Most hypnotherapy is used in the context of alternative medicine and the precise rationale is not well-defined in terms of condition or symptom. Thus, this section is entirely misleading. The best reviews we have on the subject is that people seek out hypnotherapy for such a wide range of reasons that to single them out as we do on this page is to do a disservice to the reader in actually describing how such activities are actually practiced. I don't even know how to begin to address this, but a complete overhaul seems like it is probably a good idea. Note also that this issue has been discussed on WP:FTN. jps (talk) 16:24, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uses 

message: — Assignment last updated by Dkhora (talk) 19:37, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: ANTH 193 - Behavioral Science in Practice