lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Peugeot 405

message: WTF is a Station Wagon?!
Since this is a European car should it not be called an Estate?
(Would it be OK for an article about an American car sold primarily into the US market to use BE terminology?)
--John Stumbles 20:01, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree in the UK the correct term is "Estate" and would agree on this term being used in the article.  However, in Europe the 405 Estate was primarily known as the "405 Break", and bear in mind that the "SW" in 207,306,307,406 and 407 variants actually stands for "Station Wagon". I will add a few more sections to this page (being a 405 nut) when I get the chance.  Davetibbs 15:49, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Station Wagon? 

message: The Sugar Cane ad with the Berlin song was not launched in October 1990; the ad was the launch ad for the car, and was first shown (in its entirity) semi-publicly at the NEC launch shows to dealers and employees of Peugeot Talbot Motor Company Ltd - I can't recall the precise timeframe, so I've not edited the article, but this was either December 1987 or January 1988.
As to the 405 T16 GR, this was effectively identical to the 205 version, but with a different external body shape. Even the floorpan was the same.
:http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=7g4F6FMJkiw pitches the ad at 1988, which would tie in what you have said.  Also http://www.clubpeugeotuk.org/articles/a_brief_history_of_the_peugeot.html states the advert was banned (!) but also states the date at 1988.  I have changed the date and added a source. Davetibbs 15:55, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Photos on this site http://405t16.free.fr/rallye.htm show two non-Pikes Peak Turbo 16s side by side - the 1989 and 1990 Paris-Dakar winning cars. Given that recent photos of both these cars and the Pikes Peak car exist, would this not prove at least three examples were built? AdrianFRST (talk) 21:48, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cane ad timeline incorrect / 405 T16 GR info 

message: Is it just me or doesn´t the last sentence of that section make any sense? The manager of Iran Khodro in June 2009 said peugeot make until October 2009. --Lennier1 (talk) 14:02, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Iran Khodro managers talk! 204.18.32.69 (talk) 09:55, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Iranian variants 
Talk:Mladen Vojičić Tifa

message: Tifa is his stage name essentialy, in addition to being his nickname. He's used it for all his solo stuff: Tifa & Vlado, Tifa Band, etc..... Zvonko 05:19, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Can somebody with better language skills than me add sources from the other "band" articles to this one? Bearian (talk) 21:27, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 
File talk:Sos.GIF

message: Oh..., this Aiman abmajid... Why doesn't he state that he made the image himself if he did it? In my opinion, this image seems to be done by him! If you oppose, pls post them down here or on my talk page. --Bruin_rrss23 (talk) 05:39, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  About that image...
Talk:Subsurface scattering

message: The depth map contains the distance between light and the nearest surface of the object, not the furthest.
Source: http://http.developer.nvidia.com/GPUGems/gpugems_ch16.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.177.162.221 (talk) 12:09, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Error

message: The current example image is just bad.  We need a good shot, both with and without SSS for comparison.  The current image does not help at all in explaining or clarifying the article.
Mazin07C₪T 20:27, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Example image

message: Isn't Marble pretty opaque?  How does SSS come in to play with an object that is typically completely opaque and flat?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Darkhelmet41290 (talk • contribs) 17:31, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Examples of materials where SSS is used

message: This passage seems wrong:
: Most materials used in real-time computer graphics today only account for the interaction of light at the surface of an object. In reality, many materials are slightly translucent: light enters the surface; is absorbed, scattered and re-emitted – potentially at a different point. Skin is a good case in point; only about 6% of reflectance is direct, 94% is from subsurface scattering.
It's not that they don't account for subsurface scattering, but rather, that they approximate it with increased direct reflectance. (They don't show skin as reflecting only 6% of the light that it's supposed to !)
—RuakhTALK 20:00, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yeah I was confused too, when I went to the source looking for that the 94%/6% figures I couldn't find them anywhere. It might have missed something but my guess would be mistaken attribution or else misinterpretation of the numbers. Foggalong (talk) 14:45, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[...] only account for the interaction of light at the surface of an object [...]" 

message: Are there any sources that use the term "subdermal scattering" as opposed to "subsurface"? It seems like a rather intuitive piece of terminology since skin is the primary subject where this becomes relevant but I can't really find that much online using that exact term. Orchastrattor (talk) 17:58, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not any in a graphics context that I am aware of. I'd assume you only see that terminology when specifically referring to skin. There are many examples of subsurface scattering that don't relate to skin. Meekohi (talk) 18:11, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terminology
Talk:Single instruction, single data

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved. Will also move the dab page to the base name, per Crouch's evidence.   — Amakuru (talk) 14:53, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: SISD →  – Propose to move the article title to the full name as it immediately becomes more descriptive and easily recognizable for users somewhat familiar with computer architecture, by recognizing the words "instruction" and "data". However, this may however conflict with WP:TITLEFORMAT. The same change has been proposed for SISD, SIMD, MISD, MIMD). Sauer202 (talk) 13:24, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 21 January 2022
Talk:Cardan grille

message: I have more material on the Cardan Grille which is related to another cryptography stub Grille Ciphers.
I would like to replace this page with an article of my own which is currently at My page User:Stevebkk
--Steve 05:48, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: more available

message: External Reference added
http://www.stormlitpublishing.com/cardonagrill.htm
The above short webpage suggests printing a grid in a spreadsheet; but, if you're going to use a spreadsheet you can just as easily mimic the entire operation without going to the trouble of cutting up a Cornflakes packet.
--Steve 04:57, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: external web site

message: Cross-reference within Wiki: I've checked the name Girolamo Cardano and find it spelt that way in other books.  The Wiki article on the man, however, spells his name Gerolamo - which results in the reference showing red.  Also, his name in French (spelt the French way) was Jérôme.
--Steve 00:53, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: spelling varies, accounts for red link

message: I don't understand this part of the article:
The above message can be sent in forced language without a grille:
 AS upon last time’s answer, is Marston rightly claiming issues with intent?
  IMmoderate says my Attorney; more papers.  Are amends assumed?''
What 'above message,' and what is this supposed to mean?  If this could be expanded, that would be great. Kundor 19:19, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Forced language"? 
Talk:Chain whip

message: The bit about the chain whip coupled with a broadsword is strange; I can't see how that would work. Google doesn't produce any information. I know nothing about Chinese martial arts, so I won't delete it, but could we have a better description and/or external reference? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.40.248.33 (talk) 04:31, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Double chain whip forms have been developed, as have forms in which a chain whip is coupled with a broadsword" 

message: "The chain whip is sometimes considered one of the hardest weapons in martial arts to apply in combat, simply because the wielder's sole focus of control of the overall weapon is through the handle."  I see two issues with this sentence -- Swords and most hand weapons are also controlled through the handle, and the wielder's focus is on controlling and aiming the tip and not on controlling the handle. This sentence should be corrected or removed.
I have heard that most wushu students who start on the chain whip give up due to pain or injury. A Chinese doctor told me that this weapon causes the greatest number of self injury which result in visits to the hospital where he works. If anyone has a reference I think it would be good replace "one of the hardest weapon to apply in combat" with "one of the hardest weapon to learn" Andrew.ma.canada (talk) 10:05, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "the wielder's sole focus of control of the overall weapon is through the handle" 
Talk:Cypress Hills Provincial Park

message: The correct name for the park is Cypress Hills Interprovincial Park. And, as you can tell by the link, an article has been started with this title. I would like to propose a merge since the articles are essentially the same. The Cypress Hills Interprovincial Park article needs quite a bit of work and if the merge is handled well, that problem would also be solved. BrianC 05:52, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge request
Talk:Philip Wadler

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians, This page has been the subject of some contentious editing in recent months, which I have cited as part of the debate about material related to ada, Cardano and IOHK being deleted. Some editors regard any reference to IOHK as 'spam'. But all the history of these changes has been deleted. Why is this? The Talk and History pages are important in understanding what has being going on and the nature of the objections. Part of the deleted content included:
This addition was reverted: 18:32, 29 December 2018‎ David Eppstein (talk | contribs)‎ . . (10,497 bytes) -1,949‎ . . (Undo IOHK blockchain spam; see Wikipedia:General sanctions/Blockchain and cryptocurrencies) (undo)
Can the deleted Talk and History pages be restored?IOHKwriter (talk) 13:29, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why has recent History and Talk on this page been deleted?

message: There is a dotted line after 30 November 2017, which is when the history is deleted. 
How can anyone do this? I thought Wikipedia was transparent in its actions.
I would like some help in getting this major edit restored.
curprev 13:29, 2 May 2019‎ IOHKwriter talk contribs‎  2,349 bytes +991‎  undo
curprev 14:31, 30 November 2017‎ 
IOHKwriter (talk) 09:14, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who deleted 18 months of History and Talk on this page?
Talk:What a Day

message: It shouldn't be "speedily deleted" because I'm not even finished with it yet. Audiori 06:02, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Remote Control (game show)

message: Note: Brady Physics and Brady Metaphysics were two separate channels (Metaphysics being a spinoff of the first).
Note: The above note is balderdash. Where's your proof, 24.215.152.72? (HairMetalLives 02:00, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brady Physics 

message: Question:  Forgive my ignorance of television schedules, but how can a show "run for 5 seasons" between 1987 and 1990?
Good Question.  Does that need to be changed?  Also, Under the description of "Beat the Bishop", what exactly is a "Vatican" Bishop?  I know it's a minor point, but shouldn't this say "Catholic" bishop?  I seem to remember a version of this called "Beat the Rabbi", wherein the contestant had to answer the question before Adam Sandler, dressed as a Rabbi, returned from taking yarmulkes off the heads of members of the audience.  Should a mention be made of that as well?  westmt01 31 July 06
Remote Control did in fact run for five seasons. The first aired from December, 1987 through the Spring of 1988. The second season aired from Spring, 1988 through late Winter, 1989. Season three aired from February/March, 1989 through the fall of 1989. Season four aired from the fall of 1989 through early 1990. The final season ran from early 1990 to August, 1990. And you're not ignorant, whoever posed this question. It's a good question. Also, there was a "Race the Rabbi" category, but it was John Ten Eyck dressed as the Rabbi. (HairMetalLives 19:22, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of seasons 

message: I notice that the first paragraph in this article is nearly incomprehensible. Television shows don't "walk," and can't have been on for 5,000 seasons, because television hasn't existed that long. Television shows don't have teleportation technology, either.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.99.139.1 (talk) 02:40, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Errors 

message: The host, Ken Ober died on November 15, 2009. Perhaps the article needs to be updated to reflect that? It's updated on his personal page but seeing how he ran Remote Control it pertains to the entry... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.1.169.84 (talk) 19:48, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ken Ober
Talk:OS-level virtualization

message: While researching for this article, I've noticed different definitions of container depending on what aspects of the technology the authors want to stress. For example, Docker defines a container as "a standard unit of software that packages up code and all its dependencies so the application runs quickly and reliably from one computing environment to another" , while this article (before I rewrote the lead) defined a container as an instance of a virtual userspace created thru OS-level virtualization . Since Docker is the most widespread container framework, the lead should give due weight to their definition (which stresses portability). Qzekrom 💬 theythem 18:24, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition of ''container'' 

message: I've renamed this back to OS-level virtualisation (shortening "Operating-system-level" to "OS-level" for a shorter title).  Container is very Linux-specific terminology (possibly borrowing on the branding of an implementation in Solaris); I've never heard of anyone referring to FreeBSD jail or DragonFly BSD's vkernel as a container; undo an ill-discussed and Linux-specific move of something that's a very well-known operating system paradigm as-is; "container" is probably also a slang, and doesn't describe all levels of "OS-level virtualisation", either; in fact, in the prior discussion itself one of the suggestions was to rename the page either to "containers" or to "jails", which shows a very clear lack of consensus of how this should be called if a rename is to be performed, and confirms that the prior name of "OS-level virtualisation" might as well be more neutral and encyclopaedic. Do not move again unless a clear and sourced consensus is apparent. There needs to be an article about "OS-level virtualisation" for other technologies to reference, which don't use "container" terminology and aren't known as "containers", and where people would be confused by the mentions of "containers". If you think a separate article about containers is warranted, feel free to create such article, but I fail to see clear evidence supporting a rename. MureninC (talk) 02:32, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I think there was a clear consensus to move to "Container (virtualization)"; while one user did suggest "jail" as an alternative target, I did implicitly address that by saying that "container"  If you disagree with the move decision, please use Wikipedia:Move review to contest it instead of reverting unilaterally. Qzekrom 💬 theythem 05:47, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

text: closed the move, so talk to him before starting a formal move review per the directions at WP:MR. Qzekrom 💬 theythem 05:50, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renaming back to “OS-level virtualisation”
Talk:Eugene A. Stead

message: proof-read the article and added a source on his ideas. removing the wikify tag. Syzergy 06:08, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: — Assignment last updated by JessicaC.bu (talk) 11:07, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Rhetorical Practices from the Ancient World to Enlightenment
Talk:Udo Dirkschneider

message: So is it acceptable or notable to state that Dirkschneider is unusually short for a heavy metal singer at 5'3"  ?  If not, well, that's what the talk page is for.  -- Miwa * talk * contribs ^_^ 06:19, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Pete Steel - 6'6"...♠♦Д narchistPig♥♣ (talk) 16:55, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Walking tall in heavy metal
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Arizona

message: Yavapai has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 22:19, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good article reassessment for [[Yavapai]] 

message: Wikimedia US Mountain West
Wikimedians of the U.S. Mountain West will hold an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MST, Tuesday evening, February 13, 2024, at meet.google.com/kfu-topq-zkd. Anyone interested in the Mountain West or the future direction of Wikipedia and the Wikimedia movement is encouraged to attend. All guests are welcome. Please see our meeting page for details.
If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from our . Thanks.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:50, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  U.S. Mountain West Online Meeting 

message: Hello! On behalf of the subject, I have submitted a few edit requests to bring the biography of Arizona-based entrepreneur and educator Matthew Pittinsky up to date. The entry has been updated little since 2014, and I've also uploaded a headshot at Wikimedia Commons. I don't edit the main space, so I am seeking editor review and implementation on my behalf. Are any members of this WikiProject willing to take a look? Inkian Jason (talk) 18:52, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested updates for Matthew Pittinsky 

message: Wikimedia US Mountain West
Wikimedians of the U.S. Mountain West will hold an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MDT, Tuesday evening, May 14, 2024, at meet.google.com/kfu-topq-zkd. Anyone interested in the Mountain West or the future direction of Wikipedia and the Wikimedia movement is encouraged to attend. All guests are welcome. Please see our meeting page for details.
If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from our . Thanks.
  
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:21, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikimedia U.S. Mountain West Online Meeting 

message: The online meeting of the Wikimedians of the U.S. Mountain West originally scheduled for May 14 has been rescheduled for 8:00 to 9:00 PM MDT, Tuesday evening, May 21, 2024, at meet.google.com/wbg-wgws-sbj. Please see our new meeting page for details.
If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from our . Thanks.
- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:46, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rescheduled online meeting of the Wikimedians of the U.S. Mountain West 05/21/2024
Talk:Federasi Serikat Petani Indonesia

message: Removed wikify and made this paragraph a stub. Syzergy 06:22, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
File talk:Ozyptila praticola - front (aka).jpg

message: Mention where you took the photo ... what country.
: I took this photo in a forest near Zwickau/Germany. -- Aka 12:48, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Please read this page for details about it. I think it IS focused on the eyes. -- Aka 12:48, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
Talk:John Tyrrell (died 1437)

message: The spelling of Tyrell and Tyrrell seems in disagreement in the title and the article. This  means the other John Tyrrell gets incorrectly routed here. 
I think we need some disambiguation? Moleskin 06:32, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There already is one, it is just the article that needs amending is it Tyrell or Tyrrell? Moleskin 06:34, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambig
Talk:Formula for change

message: D = Dissatisfaction
V = Vision
F = "Initial, concrete steps that can be taken toward the vision"
R = Resistance
Why "F"?  Why not S for Steps?
I did a quick web search and only found other sites that have copied this article.
:I've also seen it written as A x B x C, but reckon "Initial" should be "First".  I am making the change. Nelson50 15:32, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  F stands for Initial?
Talk:National Treasure (North Korea)

message: The introduction is obscure:
: "Designated [by who?] national treasures of North Korea are tangible artifacts, sites, and buildings deemed [by who, again?] to have significant historical or artistic value. They are not, however, considered [by who?] important enough to merit designation as a national treasure.
This sounds as if this was an official list, promulgated by some DPRK institution, but was this list really published in the DPRK, or by some south Korean (i.e. external) agency? Please clarify. --Babelfisch (talk) 10:27, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weasel words 

message: Is the Sinuiju North Korean Leader's Residence considered a "National Treasure?" Often the residences of Kim Jong-Il and other leaders are considered as being as such. Twillisjr (talk) 22:27, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sinuiju North Korean Leader's Residence 
Talk:Caterpillar D7

message: I don't believe that the 1st 2 sentences of this article are appropriate to this encyclopedia, as they seem to be just advertising.  The rest of the page is just copied out of an owner's manual.  --Alphachimp talk 06:38, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Better now ? - Peripitus 13:15, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Doepfer A-100

message: Lunatikwreckless, hi again and thanks for the explanation in the email; I just received it.  That's great that you've contacted Doepfer about this.  They should seriously consider re-licensing those technical documents under the GFDL or a GFDL-compatible license.  That would take care of this problem entirely.  If this is not possible, then I do not believe grammatical corrections and small word changes will circumvent the copyright policy on WP. I could be wrong, but I don't think technical documents are republishable under a fair use argument.  Anyways, this Wikipedia:Boilerplate request for permission might be useful to provide to Doepfer. They seem like a fairly forward-thinking tech company, so hopefully they'll see the benefit of re-licensing their docs under the GFDL. Let me know if I can help. --Ds13 06:41, 23 May 2006 (UTC)