Talk:Neutral country

message: How can the US be described as neutral in 1914-17 and 1939-41? It did everything possible to help the British Empire from the very beginning of both world wars, without actually declaring war on Germany. (MarekValenti (talk) 21:18, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: During those years, both sides recognized the US as neutral.  While you are certainly correct in this, I'd say if even the Germans officially recognized our neutrality then, so should WP. Scott P. (talk) 19:43, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  United States? 

message: Ireland's neutrality is long disputed. (MarekValenti (talk) 21:37, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Hopefully in the upcoming upgrade. Scott P. (talk) 19:44, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  The map should be changed 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Neutral country. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081030085827/http://www.viitorul.org/public/866/en/IonM%20-%20studiu_neutralitate__eng_.doc to http://www.viitorul.org/public/866/en/IonM%20-%20studiu_neutralitate__eng_.doc
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:34, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks kindly for the "link-rot-fix".  Scott P. (talk) 19:49, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Neutral country. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130516220753/http://www.landespolizei.li/Portals/0/docs/pdf-Files/Imagebroschuere_LP_e_end.pdf to http://www.landespolizei.li/Portals/0/docs/pdf-Files/Imagebroschuere_LP_e_end.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090407000013/http://www.eubusiness.com/news-eu/1238985121.47 to http://www.eubusiness.com/news-eu/1238985121.47
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:03, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I think that the light yellow and cyan colors on this world map are too bright, which makes the map less readable. I can recreate a colored world map. Everyone's opinion?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.34.23.1 (talk) 06:53, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  I think the color of the map is too bright 

message: Why is SFR Yugoslavia totally ignored in the article? SFR Yugoslavia after 1949 after the Stalin-Tito split initiated a foreign and military policy of neutrality, so much that it became the leading force of the Non-Alligned Movement, a movement which laid its foundations in neutrality and which was of high importance during most of the Cold War era. Besides cases such as Sweden or Switzerland, the Non-Alligned countries in which Yugoslavia had a leading role was basically the definition of neutrality. Some even considering it a Third Way, or Third Power, with other two being the Unites States and Soviet Union with its allies. Its a fact that Non-Alliegned movement is much neglected in present time, but totally ommiting Yugoslavia from this article becomes a major flaw. FkpCascais (talk) 12:29, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  SFR Yugoslavia 

message: If i am not mistaken iceland is missing as
Like the rest of the nordics iceland was nautral til it was invaded by the uk Andri12 (talk) 04:31, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Iceland 

message: I feel like the map displayed on the article needs more explanation or should be deleted. The article states, "A neutral country is a state that is neutral towards belligerents in a specific war or holds itself as permanently neutral". The map merely states which color corresponds to which degree of neutrality for a country. Which specific war does the map show? Who are the belligerents? Why are some countries not colored? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Darer101 (talk • contribs) 18:39, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not enough detail for map/irrelevancy 

message: :: "Portugal officially stayed neutral, but actively supported both the Allies by providing overseas naval bases, and Germany by selling tungsten."
There is no regulation of trade in terms of neutrality, no article in the Hague convention speaks to trade. If Portugal engaged in trade, it would actually not affect status of neutrality. From a "feeling" understanding of neutrality, this may be relevant, but from an actual definition, it is not. I think this should be removed or moved to some discussion section, if that is a thing.  78.72.87.250 (talk) 13:13, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Portugal note w r t sales 

message: https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/neutral-countries
https://www.adducation.info/general-knowledge-politics-religion/all-neutral-countries/ 81.101.7.190 (talk) 13:02, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  2 websites I am unsure on 

message: why indonesia doesnt mention it in this article? despite indonesia has recently transformed into a neutral country. especially in the wake of fall of suharto. is indonesia a neutral country or not? 2404:8000:1027:85F6:9CE4:D84C:8192:D6F8 (talk) 06:43, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  wheres indonesia? 

message: I have removed this sentence from the lead section:
At best a matter of opinion presented as an uncontroversial fact, it is not even supported by the cited source, and is historically inaccurate.  It is easy to find violations of credible neutrality long before the 1st and 2nd World Wars.
If someone wants to start a new section on the objective security value of neutrality - a highly debated topic - they can do so, adhering to Wikipedia's guidelines about neutrality and reliable sources.Ttocserp 12:41, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of statement not supported by cited source, historically inaccurate 

message: india is also neutral? 91.129.100.53 (talk) 10:01, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  India?