lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Area of the countries of the United Kingdom

message: Nations are cultural entities and do not have areas -- countries have areas.  This article now has an inappropriate title. It would be better moved back to the original one. -- Derek Ross |  Talk
Page title needs correcting:
Can anyone who knows how change the name of this page to, for example, "List of United Kingdom countries by area". And also do the same for the page: "List of United Kingdom nations by population " Thanks. WikiUser 21:51, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: The article will in due course be listed at Wikipedia:Requested moves. Please see that page for more details. It will also be listed for disputed content.WikiUser 20:30, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Page title needs correcting, further

message: People should note please that: Putting information in articles that is 300 years out of date again and again, month after month, amounts to vandalism.
And also that I have never reverted this article page; as is my standard practice on the wikipedia, and as it always has been, I have edited it.WikiUser 17:57, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Article page note

message: The numbers in this list do not add up. Does anyone have a reference for where these statistics come from? -- zzuuzz (talk) 12:02, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: This page is a list of United Kingdom countries and English regions by area. It should be renamed List of United Kingdom countries by area or List of United Kingdom regions by area. Any comments? -- zzuuzz (talk) 12:02, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: If it has to be renamed, then 'regions' or 'parts' would be better than 'countries'. Owain 12:34, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Page needs renaming
Talk:Dodge Caravan

message: I am confused by this statement: "Positioned as a minivan for price-conscious customers and to draw traffic to the dealerships, a substantial number of Caravans are sold to low-margin rental fleets." Is there a cause and effect relationship? There's no mention in the source cited.--Now wiki (talk) 16:11, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: You can take out "draw traffic to the dealerships".  The Grand Caravan isn't exactly a halo car.  The first part could be rephrased a bit, saying one reason the Caravan is still popular is that it's priced less than the Pacifica. --Vossanova o< 17:20, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fifth generation (2008–present)
Talk:Roche de la Muzelle

message: So little information in the table, it would be better to move it into the main text.
Also better to remove "stunningly beautiful"
: (William M. Connolley 22:46, 14 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: it's not about whether the page is full of text or not.  check the styleguide.  it's a POV. --Tomheaton 08:32, 15 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text:  (William M. Connolley 09:28, 15 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text:  agreed on the table staying in then.--Tomheaton 09:47, 15 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text:  (William M. Connolley 15:49, 15 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you care about this much more than me, so I'll leave it.--Tomheaton 16:13, 15 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text:  (William M. Connolley 17:44, 15 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:Media

message: yes, it is my fault. but interactive media and locative media are media (in the sense of media of communication) and still not "mass media". the "mass" in "mass media" alone shows clearly that there are media that are not "mass media". i agree to the charles mathews that there are communication media that are not mass media. think of mcluhan and his examples of media (e.g. currency and roads). think of letters and media art projects. i am for re-opening the category "media" and re-establishing a wiki page on "media" instead of having only "mass media" with references to "non-mass media" (and undeniably speech is not the least important medium).
there is academic discourse over media that goes beyond mass media. it should be reflected in wikipedia.yes, it is my fault. but interactive media and locative media are media (in the sense of media of communication) and still not "mass media". the "mass" in "mass media" alone shows clearly that there are media that are not "mass media". i agree to the charles mathews that there are communication media that are not mass media. think of mcluhan and his examples of media (e.g. currency and roads). think of letters and media art projects. i am for re-opening the category "media" and re-establishing a wiki page on "media" instead of having only "mass media" with references to "non-mass media" (and undeniably speech is not the least important medium). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Martinpi (talk • contribs) 
:The mass media category should be directed here. Otherwise, the false implications are that media isn't important unless it is applied to the masses. Oicumayberight (talk) 18:11, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Support for redirecting :Category:Mass media to here. It needs a bot to do this though. If there are no objections to it I'm going to ask some knowledgable person about this any time soon... --Fixuture (talk) 18:44, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  reopening this category
Talk:Cadillac STS

message: show cadillac sts for 2005
All the infoboxes for different topics are color coded.  The auto ones need to have the automobile standard color specified at Wikipedia:WikiProject Automobiles/Layouts.  If you're going to change them, change them to that.  Thanks.Hektor 19:34, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Mag Mell

message: Hello! Dia daoibh, all fans of Ireland :) (I am one of you). Was Tir na nOg an 'underworld' ?? As I remember, it was an island on the West of Ireland (though, AFAIR, it was 'a land below the wave', and in order to go there, one had to jump into the sea in some place; well, the hero CuChulainn managed to do it ALIVE). What connection had Mag Mel with Tir na nOg? What about the rulers? Could anyone please explain the issues? Greetings, Crito
Hey all.  I've been following others' lead in redirecting all tir-na-nog (and there are a lot of ways to spell it) pages here.  But I'm starting to think they should be separate pages.  Seems like the Oisín story is always about Tir na nOg and there is a separate Cuchalain story about Mag Mell.  And TNN is usually an island while MM is usually underwater.  I'm no expert; can someone confirm that we should be separating these subjects?  --Chinasaur 10:06, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: I think that the irish man founded America in their minds a long ago and before any one. THey new that on the west there are islands of joy and migrated there during the 20th century.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nix1129 (talk • contribs) 14:29, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  POW 

message: I propose merging Mag Mell into Tír na nÓg. I think the content in Mag Mell, can easily be explained in the context of Tír na nÓg as it is already partially covered, and a merge would not cause any article-size. Information is repeated in this article that is already in Tír na nÓg Pk052 (talk) 07:12, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Prekmurska gibanica

message: Article was listed on WP:VFD 14 Sep to 20 Sep 2004, consensus was to kep and list on cleanup.  Discussion:
Wikipedia is not a cookbook.  Unless this article gets a nice expansion, I think it should be deleted. -Frazzydee|✍ 23:29, 14 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Vote for deletion 2004

message: I have removed the following part:
The original gibanica (ГИБАНИЦА in Serbian) recipe is of Serbian origin. A Croatian variant is made in the region of Medimurje, hence known as Medimurska gibanica.
===External links===
*Cheese Strudel Pie - Gibanica - The best Serbian recipes
*Kuvarica
I'm not sure that just because it's called a gibanica we can safely assume that it originated from Serbia. It seems to me to be more of a consequence of the similarity of the lnaguages rather than anything else. And also, that info should be added to the article on gibanica, when created, not prekmurska gibanica. edolen1 23:27, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  gibanica 

message: *Cheese Strudel Pie - Gibanica - The best Serbian recipes
*Kuvarica
I'm not sure that just because it's called a gibanica we can safely assume that it originated from Serbia. It seems to me to be more of a consequence of the similarity of the lnaguages rather than anything else. And also, that info should be added to the article on gibanica, when created, not prekmurska gibanica. edolen1 23:27, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: External links

message: The title was incorrectly changed from Prekmurska gibanica to Prekmurje gibanica, probably by someone that does not understand the difference between an adjective (Prekmurska - ie. coming from Prekmurje) and a noun (Prekmurje - region name) in Slovenian. The sources also *all* name it correctly in Slovenian. The title should be thus changed back to Prekmurska gibanica. Whether or not an English version is appended I have no opinion (it would be "Prekmurje layered cake") . I actually opened my first wikipedia account to do it, but can not since there seems to be a threshold on what I can do at this time (somewhere I read my account needs to be open 4 days and I must make 10 edits). So I ask someone else to correct that horrid mistake. Mmiklic 12:34, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title change request 

message: Please see Talk:Međimurska gibanica. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 09:34, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge with Međimurska gibanica
Talk:Tanden

message: Pleae add the Kanji characters to this page, as well as to the one on Hara (Fu), if you know them. This needs to be fleshed out, as presently this deep subject is dealt with simply as a dictionary entry. The depth of the subject matter is definiely Kurobi material, and well beyond me at this time. whiskers (talk) 23:32, 14 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I done added the characters.  I also merged this page with Hara (Martial Arts) -- as that talk page mentions, Wikipedia is not a dictionary.  Also, provided that I have the character correct, the Chinese (at least, the modern Mandarin Chinese) for "hara" is not "fu" but "du" -- which is certainly a commonly heard everyday Chinese word for the stomach. - Nat Krause 15:12, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The more common character for "hara" is 腹 (Pinyin: fù) not 肚 (Pinyin: dù).  Other phrases that a typical martial arts buff might know that involve the character 腹: 腹切り (hara-kiri), 切腹 (seppuku).
*.jp Google hits for "腹": 1,640,000
*.jp Google hits for "肚": 101,000
A-cai 10:31, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Kanji character
Talk:Terrance Lindall

message: Highly pro-Lindall POV.  The fact that Lindall is not a surrealist (because he himself admitted as much, and because his "manifesto" admits that he was quite surprised by the basic principles of surrealism, with which he was completely unfamiliar) should be included in the final article, and the vehement anti-Lindallism of surrealists alluded to in some fashion.  --Daniel C. Boyer 23:45, 14 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have apparently not abided by the guideline in Wiki about not editing an article about myself. I apologize. I will not make further edits in keeping with that policy. I will continue to monitor it as Philip Trueman suggests, and also clarify any errors in the article on this discussion page. Terrance Lindall 18:47, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you, Terrance, for taking this approach.  The  tag I placed on the article has already been removed, by Immunonuclear (talk contribs), whom I also thank.  I am assuming good faith, but I find it strange that this is Immunonuclear's first, and so far only, contribution to Wikipedia.  I hope he has read WP:SOCK.  If I were a suspicious man I would ask for a Checkuser, but I'm not and I won't.  I also intend to monitor this page, and the contributions of Terrance and Immunonuclear. Philip Trueman 09:43, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: In Response to a request from a wikipedian

message: Definitely needs clean-up. Consider the following:
*WP:BLP - How to deal with articles on living persons. You'll also note a box at the top of this discussion page linking to the Biography wikiproject. They are extremely helpful with their information on setting up an article and finding comparatively great articles to use as a guideline.
*WP:CITE, WP:INDY, WP:RS and WP:V - sourcing (which this article sorely needs)
*WP:NPOV - to maintain neutrality, some negative criticism must appear alongside the positives. The quotes that are given should also be from notable sources. For example, what's so great about "Greg Fasolino"? As far as I know, this is Lindall's extremely supportive dad (heh... I'm just making a point).
*WP:NOT#INFO - Consider the excessive list of works published, etc. Are all of these works worth noting? If so, the list can almost certainly be streamlined (i.e. list all Creepy covers together).
*That might help an editor dedicated to this particular topic get started on clean-up. Best of luck! --Midnightdreary 14:18, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Great example of "missed the point." :) --Midnightdreary 13:27, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean-up needed; some suggestions 
Talk:The President Wore Pearls

message: How can I edit the infotable to include this episode? Or is that something only administrators and other high clearance people can do?- B-101 00:12, 15 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Shouldn't Lisa's E-mail address be smartgirl63_\@yahoo.com thus invalid? I think that's what the producers meant. 68.73.118.48 22:15, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lisa's E-mail address

message: The boy, introducing Lisa to the school, says "regardez." This is not a goof: normally, one child would say "regarde" to the other, but the two have never met, ergo the boy is being formal.JW 01:12, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regardez 

message: That song is already sung while Lisa's debate with Nelson ("So vote for me kids of Springfield" => "Don't Cry For Me Argentina" etc.) FAThomssen (talk) 12:42, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Don't Cry For Me Argentina
Talk:École pratique des Hautes études

message: "The École pratique des hautes études is a university in Paris, France. It is part of the University of Paris." Well, but apparently not, since it is an ecole and since it is part of the University. Why is this not developed at the existing University of Paris entry? Points off for unnecessary stubs, you know. Wetman 01:47, 15 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Advanced Power Management

message: Sorry if this is a beginner question, but I'm still quite new to Wikipedia - is the reference to FOLDOC still required now that no of the content is from FOLDOC? Gechurch (talk) 10:40, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  FOLDOC 

message: The document cited as the reason for the move is inconsistent in its use of case.  As mentioned in the citation, all things which are a title (such as chapter names, diagram titles, etc. and references to same) are capitalized as demanded for those contexts.  There are two other mentions in the text, one is capitalized (as I think it should be becuase it is a proper noun) and the other is all lower case, making any claim that it should be lower cased inconclusive.  The trouble is, I don't know how one would go about moving it back and make this redirect go away.
-- Joe (talk) 14:12, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  This should not have been moved to the lower case name
Talk:Complete contract

message: The current article is a stub. It is , i.m.h.o., better to create a "contracts in economics" page where the discussion of complete and incomplete contracts is discussed. Then a consistent discussion of complete and incomplete contracts, their definitions, the different methodologies and implications can be given proper attention. 
Also the link to default rules is not correct in this version. Default rules, according to the classic law and economics literature, is based either on a majoritarian rule or is written to induce the revelation of private information. A complete contract on the other hand is a contract where obligations are directly dependent on all performance relevant variables (i.e. all variables in the various utility functions). Default rules do not have this property, and cannot make a contract complete in this sence. A different, though misleading definition of complete contracts, that a contract is complete if it stipulates a rule in every possible state of the world, would make default rules contract completing institutions. Yet this definition is too simple, as Avery and Katz have mentioned. They point out that under the latter definition, every contract can be made complete by adding a clause "in all situations not dealt with in the above, rule X applies". It is a simple observation that adding such a clause by no means would guarantee that a pareto efficient exchange would result (assuming one is possible in the first place). In economic sence, the contract remains incomplete and does not maximize welfare given the restrictions. 
Nvdb 08:45, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too short and incorrect
Talk:Chromate and dichromate

message: 2 CrO42− + 2 H3O+ → Cr2O72− + 3 H2O
Note: Someone please check above for accuracy, H3O+, should it not be H2O if it's in an aqueous solution, if this is not true, please send me a reason why, to psychicpanda@gmail.com, thanks, otherwise fix the error.
Or is this because to be balanced on one side it requires 2 H3O+ to balance the 2-, though I thought that in water, it does not need to be balanced, unless as stated above its in equilibrium, which means that it doesn't need to be ionically balanced, but balanced on both sides, as in the anions and cations are equal on both sides, but not adding up to a neutral charge.
:The reaction is correct.  H3O+ can exist in solution; it's a hydrated H+ ion, which you could get by dissolving an acid.  See: Acid#Chemical characteristics. Hashproduct 01:30, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, technically, both H30+ and HO- exist in all water, at concentrations varying inversely and directly with pH, respectively. Though their concentration in neutral water is pretty low. Calvacadeofcats (talk) 01:37, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You cannot be serious. How would this equation be correct? First of all, there is zero net charge on the left side and there is -2 on the right side; second, the number of hydrogen atoms is 6 on the left side and 4 on the right side. Thus this barely qualifies as an "equation". 91.120.152.221 (talk) 21:32, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Uhm. The equation is correct. On the LHS, the charge is 2*(-2) + 2*(+1) = -4 + 2 = -2, and on the RHS, the charge is -2. The number of hydrogen atoms on LHS is 2*3 = 6, and the number of hydrogen atoms on RHS is 3*2 = 6. Where's the error?—Tetracube (talk) 21:44, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have checked the reaction equation; it is correct.  The charge is balanced with a net -2 charge on both sides.  The number of Cr atoms with 2 on both sides, the number of O atoms with 10 on both sides, and the number of H atoms with 6 on both sides, are all correctly balanced.  H Padleckas (talk) 00:45, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question about H<sub>3</sub>O<sup>+</sup> 

message: I suggest separating chromate and dichromate into two articles.
They also both need a polish and more information.
Bob782 (talk) 13:50, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate and improve? 

message: "The red line on the predominance diagram is not quite horizontal due to the simultaneous equilibrium with the chromate ion."
Shouldn't that be vertical? Vmelkon (talk) 15:05, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Predominance Diagram 

message: At the top of the page, it states that: "This article is about chromium(VI) cation. For chromium(III) cation, see chromite (compound)." but surely it is an anion, not a cation.--Pianoplonkers (talk • contribs) 10:49, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Issue about the opening
Talk:Dream Job season 2

message: Can I get one of those "Current or ongoing events" bars at the top of the page? Thanks.Mike HackneyMike Hackney
Never mind. I figured it out.Mike Hackney 01:55, 19 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Richard Hadlee

message: Is the stand named after him? Or after the Hadlee family? - Shudda talk 07:56, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hadlee Stand 

message: Not so odd. Cricketers who bat and bowl opposite-handed are extremely common - he shares this particular combination with, among others, Marcus Trescothick, Mark Butcher, Graham Thorpe (all occasional bowlers, admittedly), Clive Lloyd, Brian Close, Graham Dilley, Chris Old, David Gower (insofar as Gower bowled at all), Bill O'Reilley, and that's enough off the top of my head. It may even be that left/left is the rarest combination of all.Captain Pedant 14:56, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  (batting) "oddly enough, left-handed" 

message: Someone more knowledgeable than me could explain why he was never made captain Of New Zealand.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.87.84.40 (talk) 17:49, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Captaincy 

message: Saw an article in cricinfo (http://content-usa.cricinfo.com/magazine/content/current/story/337858.html) about his suicide attempt and was surprised not to find that information in this article  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eramesan (talk • contribs) 02:14, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That article dosn't seem to say that he actually attemtped suicide, it could be read as saying he had thought about it.  We'd need something a lot stronger, and more detailed (when, why?) to be able to treat it proeprly.  The book itself may well include that information of course.  David Underdown (talk) 12:02, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suicide Attempt 

message: Was the incident known as that at the time, or is it, as I suspect, an anachronism? The vogue for calling every scandal -gate seems to be much more recent. Do any RS use the term? --Dweller (talk) 05:59, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Didn't see a single Google result for Hadlee and cargate, only result I found was at Tripod.com. Being unsourced/negative I've removed the car portion, and kept the not-talking-to-Coney part for which I did find a couple of reasonable references. The car portion can be restored if a satisfactory reference can be found, per WP:BLP. XLerate (talk) 01:51, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I remember it being mentioned in the newspapers in India, but don't remember it being called 'cargate' or anything. Tintin 03:47, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I strongly suspect anachronism. Thanks chaps. --Dweller (talk) 12:24, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Cargate" 

message: only 3653 balls bowled ? kapil / imran bowled 27000, 19000 +  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.197.126.104 (talk) 04:47, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  stats seem odd
Talk:Free at Last (DC Talk album)

message: November 18, 1992 was a Wednesday. Releases were done on Tuesdays until :Beyoncé (album) was released in 2013. Granted, November 1, 1992 was a Sunday and there's no way that happened. Why the unexplained change? Walter Görlitz (talk) 07:18, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release date
Talk:Supernatural (DC Talk album)

message: This was the last album that dc Talk released before their Intermission: the Greatest Hits compilation album. Is this the last one...forever? They have not released a new album since that. Some might say that the Solo EP was a new album, but I don't, because Solo EP had songs that tobyMac, Tait, and Kevin Max made by themselves. They have contributed together for the remix of Toby's "Atmosphere", on Welcome to Diverse City. They also came together for the song "Let's Roll" on the album of the same name, but that had other artists on it too. To date, Supernatural was the last album that dc Talk released that had all new songs on it. Hope and pray that there will be another one someday! Later!!!! 152.163.100.204 20:54, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  last album 