Talk:List of diplomatic missions in Ottawa

message: Join the discussion.
(Replace "_blank_" with all location names.)
Россавиа Диалог: has nominated Embassies and High Commissions in "_blank_" for renaming to Diplomatic missions in "_blank_". Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Embassies and high commissions by (city) categories . Thank you. CaribDigita (talk) 00:31, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  CfD nomination of Category:Embassies and High Commissions in _blank_ --> Category:Diplomatic missions in _blank_ 

message: There is now a discussion at WP:FOR on the formatting and content of "List of diplomatic missions" articles. As this discussion ostensibly could affect this article, editors are encouraged to provide their opinions on the WP:FOR at this link - Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_International_relations#Formatting_of_diplomatic_missions_lists - please do not discuss on this article talk page as valid points for consideration may very well not be seen by editors at large. Thank you, --Russavia Dialogue Stalk me 01:47, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: As this article was used as a base for inspiration of developing Diplomatic missions in Russia, if these formats are to be kept, instead of reverting back to List of diplomatic missions in India style, I urge all editors on this article to weigh in with their opinions. --Russavia Dialogue Stalk me 04:26, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion at WP:FOR on formatting and content of "List of diplomatic missions" article 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of diplomatic missions in Ottawa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110525040805/http://www.mfa.gov.hu/kulkepviselet/CA/en/mainpage.htm to http://www.mfa.gov.hu/kulkepviselet/CA/en/mainpage.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:41, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on List of diplomatic missions in Ottawa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://w01.international.gc.ca/Protocol-Protocole/Heads-Chefs.aspx?lang=eng
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150722154111/http://www.madagascar-embassy.ca/web/homepage.php to http://www.madagascar-embassy.ca/web/homepage.php
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141129054054/http://www.ambamaroc.ca/ to http://www.ambamaroc.ca/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151030070451/http://www.mofa.gov.qa/en/Countries/Pages/CA.aspx to http://www.mofa.gov.qa/en/Countries/Pages/CA.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:12, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The photo included for Vietnam is not on McKay Street. It is at 85 Glebe Avenue in the Glebe.
Grandma Roses (talk) 12:23, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vietnam 

message: MANY years ago I noticed some wiki-bot(sic) that seemed to be a tool Wikipedia was using to sanitize the pervasive use of INSECURE, privacy leaking, non-TLS links on Wikipedia. Seriously, what gives? Why do wiki pages such as this one, bascically almost trick unsupecting users into clicking these links? Isn't their wiki policy around this?
There is no technical reason and this is extremely unethical. 
Fellow library users, wifi-hotspot fans, litterally multiple tech companies(and we know they log EVERYTHING) and whomever happens to be curious (i.e. listening in where the embassy site is housed(co-located) all get free open text viewing of this access of the embassy site. I did a quick perusal of policy, guidelines etc., but I'm at a loss and kinda shocked. I'm almost positive this is an already solved problem (automation fixes this easily), so why (and WHERE) are policy regarding this issue? 198.91.228.76 (talk) 00:20, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why are so many links insecure?