lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Esteban Granero

message: The referenced Sky Sports article says that ”It is believed that Madrid valued the player at around €24m (£18.4m)” but that’s certainly not what Getafe payed for him? According to El Mundo it was 5 million euros which sounds more like it. Can anyone find a better source (an article specifically about the Granero transfer preferrably) or shall we go with this one? –Kooma (di algo) 19:35, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transfer fee 

message: As there seems to be something of a contraversy regarding the 2010-11 Real Madrid squad numbers , I thought it best just to make the note here that the source for this change is the Real Madrid website first team squad page:
The English version of this page has not been updated (although the club shop page has been) and I suspect that this is what is causing the current confusion.
Wolsey01 (talk) 12:47, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Squad Number 2010/11

message: has been noted! db1987db (talk) 20:19, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  vandalism
Talk:SriLankan Airlines

message: Why doesn't this airline have any destinations to the Americas?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clrichey (talk • contribs) 04:48, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reasons for no destinations to North America and South America? 

message: Is this a viable option? TIA 31114 (talk) 16:06, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename 'SriLankan' to 'Sri Lankan'. Add the space between..?
Talk:USS Stingray (SS-186)

message: Hopefully, someone more qualified can address this.  The article currently says "with Lieutenant L. N. Blair in command."
It seems unlikely that a Lieutenant would be given command of a boat.  Should this possibly be "Lt. Commander?"
Kirby  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.184.23.23 (talk) 03:13, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible correction?  

message: Why no mention that the sub's name was used in the 1996 movie Down Periscope for that World War Two sub?
Just curious. 2600:8800:784:8F00:C23F:D5FF:FEC4:D51D (talk) 09:05, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sub name
Talk:USS Sturgeon (SS-187)

message: Can anybody say if Chas Freeman is any relation to Larry Freeman, later CO Skipjack?  TREKphiler hit me ♠  22:42, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Blue bio

message: Can anybody say what date she suffered her main induction casualty? Its similarity to Squalus bears mentioning.  TREKphiler hit me ♠  23:05, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Event 500
Talk:Jean-Lou Chameau

message: I think I have heard Jean-Paul Herteman mention a former Chairman of Caltech as a member of Safran board.... Euroflux (talk) 19:02, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jean-Lou Chameau Member of the Board of Safran ? 

message: Look at the discussion about Wernher von Braun and about Alfred Belpaire
Since Jean-Lou Chameau spent a big part of his professional life in the US, we put him in the category of American engineers, no matter whether he officially received the US citizenship or not . 
Alfred Belpaire can be considered as well French engineer + Belgian engineer. Euroflux (talk) 19:13, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jean-Lou Chameau = French engineer + American engineer
Talk:Hipólito Rincón

message: The revision I made combining all the loose sentences into one paragraph was reverted because the "Spacings there for a reason." What reason is that? Normally, the lead section of an article contains full paragraphs not individual sentences. As the sentences already included in the article could be fit together to make one cohesive paragraph, I combined them to make the article look better grammatically. (Skoot13 (talk) 14:10, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  What spacing? 
Talk:USS Gar

message: The Gar is a Gar class sub like Grampus SS-207, Grayback SS-208, Grayling SS-209, Grenadier SS-210 and Gudgeon SS-211. It is not a Trambor but a slightly improved version of the Tambor class. It could carry around 2500 gallons more fuel for example.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.20.245.203 (talk) 22:09, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Talk:USS Tambor

message: A torpedoman who served on the Tambor has published a memoir about his time on the USS Tambor. It would be interesting to get a copy and use it to flesh out this page...
Were Pirates: A Torpedoman’s Pacific War  NGC1976 (talk) 06:28, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled

message: need an actual picture 71.161.41.63 01:55, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  pic 

message: The article seems to say her first war patrol started just after Pearl Harbor and ended before she went to Mare Island. Then later it says her first war patrol started after she returned from Mare Island. Which is it? Kendall-K1 (talk) 15:37, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The second is correct, but arguably, they both are. Tambor was on simulated war patrol in November '41 & was off Wake when the Japanese attacked. Her first "sailed on war patrol" was in March '42.  TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura  18:38, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I've re-worded it, see if you think it's accurate. I changed "when WWII broke out" because the war had been going on for a couple of years before 1941, just not between the US and Japan. Kendall-K1 (talk) 22:38, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: You're fine there. Good catch, too; I hadn't noticed that one.  TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura  01:55, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  When was first war patrol? 

message: The link to tambor is obviously wrong. DANFS says the ship was named for "the red rock fish of the Pacific coast," so I'm going to link it to Sebastes, although I can't find anything that says there is a species in this genus known as the "tambor." Kendall-K1 (talk) 22:50, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to tambor
Talk:USS Tang (SS-563)

message: What is a "KVA", as referred to in this article?
* Is this a reference to the unit of apparent power "kVa" or 1,000 volts amps?
* Is it related to the Tang's Fairbanks Morse diesel generator?
* Is this referring to a transformer in the Tang's AMR2?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Et Cum Spiritu Tuo (talk • contribs) 04:45, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "a failed KVA"
Talk:Ismael López (footballer, born 1978)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Page moved. (closed by non-admin page mover)  Jerm (talk) 15:39, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Ismael Santiago →  – WP:COMMONNAME is "Ismael López" or just "Ismael", doesn't use his middle name professionally. Sources on page: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, all on page. Ortizesp (talk) 15:09, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

text: Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. GiantSnowman 15:41, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 17 May 2021
Talk:USS Gudgeon (SS-567)

message: The lengthy section on the boat's misadventures off Vladivostok is copied word-for-word from this article, published in the Chicago Tribune in 1991. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 22:25, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for spotting that.   It's certainly a significant incident.  Does anyone fancy bringing it back, appropriately, and using the Tribune piece as a source?  Ideally with some other sourcing too. Andy Dingley (talk) 23:12, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagiarism 
Talk:USS Whitefish (SS-432)

message: The article states the ship was never built.  Doesn't that make it a proposed name rather than "the name"?  I also do not see how it could be the "only" ship named for ANYTHING if it was never built or launched or christened?69.40.243.207 (talk) 16:41, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The phrasing is taken from the official Dictionary of American Naval Fighting Ships. It is used there for at least dozens of cancelled vessels. RobDuch (talk) 22:41, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Yahweh (disambiguation)

message: I have for the moment rolled back the addition of Jehovah related entries and fixed the dab notices and redirects. Please see my related comment at Talk:Jehovah#Disambiguation_pages --Tikiwont 07:53, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jehova entries 

message: according to all religious texts (and the majority of information we have) on Yahweh, he was not a "national" God. The people of Israel did not consider him to be and neither do modern Jews, Christians, or Muslims. Schwarzschild Point • 16:16, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: But we don't rely solely on religious texts. Many sources that meet our criteria at WP:RS refer to him as Israel's national god. See. Doug Weller (talk) 16:36, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, there are such sources. But there are also plenty of reliable sources that would tell you that Yahweh is the name of the god of modern Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. We shouldn't privilege one usage or point of view over another on a disambiguation page. I will attempt to come up with a description that will be more NPOV. — trlkly 23:58, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "national God"
Talk:Ludovic Obraniak

message: I saw that he had no page created for himself, so I decided to make one. I don't create many pages, so I try to find adequate sources. Please feel free to amend any information that may be wrong (or add an infobox).Slgr84 06:59, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Gomphocarpus physocarpus

message: I note that Martha Stewart showed the fruit of Gomphocarpus physocarpus while on the "The Late Show" with David Letterman and stated that they were called "hairy balls".  A Google search of "hairy balls gomphocarpus" reveals that "hairy balls" is really a popular name for the plant and its fruit.  I didn't add the name to the article, but I think that the information ought to be included merely because it's accurate.Toddabearsf (talk) 23:09, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional popular name
Talk:Jonathan Soriano

message: According to the player himself his name is Jonatan, not Jonathan: https://www.elmundo.es/deportes/futbol/champions-league/2020/10/26/5f97423bfdddffb03c8b4596.html Article and redirect should be amended.
31.10.164.93 (talk) 09:36, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proper spelling
Talk:List of The Daily Show episodes (1996)

message: It seems that this article is using colours in the infobox which don't satisfy Wikipedia's accessibility guidelines. The contrast between the foreground colour and the background colour is low, which means that it may be difficult or impossible for people with visual impairments to read it.
To correct this problem, a group of editors have decided to remove support for invalid colours from Template:Infobox television season and other television season templates after 1 September 2015. If you would still like to use custom colours for the infobox and episode list in this article after that date, please ensure that the colours meet the WCAG AAA standard.
To test whether a colour combination is AAA-compliant you can use Snook's colour contrast tool. If your background colour is dark, then please test it against a foreground colour of "FFFFFF" (white). If it is light, please test it against a foreground colour of "000000" (black). The tool needs to say "YES" in the box for "WCAG 2 AAA Compliant" when you input the foreground and the background colour. You can generally make your colour compliant by adjusting the "Value (%)" fader in the middle box.
Please be sure to change the invalid colour in every place that it appears, including the infobox, the episode list, and the series overview table. If you have any questions about this, please ask on Template talk:Infobox television season. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:30, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colour contrast problems
Talk:List of The Daily Show episodes (1999)

message: It seems that this article is using colours in the infobox which don't satisfy Wikipedia's accessibility guidelines. The contrast between the foreground colour and the background colour is low, which means that it may be difficult or impossible for people with visual impairments to read it.
To correct this problem, a group of editors have decided to remove support for invalid colours from Template:Infobox television season and other television season templates after 1 September 2015. If you would still like to use custom colours for the infobox and episode list in this article after that date, please ensure that the colours meet the WCAG AAA standard.
To test whether a colour combination is AAA-compliant you can use Snook's colour contrast tool. If your background colour is dark, then please test it against a foreground colour of "FFFFFF" (white). If it is light, please test it against a foreground colour of "000000" (black). The tool needs to say "YES" in the box for "WCAG 2 AAA Compliant" when you input the foreground and the background colour. You can generally make your colour compliant by adjusting the "Value (%)" fader in the middle box.
Please be sure to change the invalid colour in every place that it appears, including the infobox, the episode list, and the series overview table. If you have any questions about this, please ask on Template talk:Infobox television season. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:30, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colour contrast problems 
Talk:List of The Daily Show episodes (2000)

message: It seems that this article is using colours in the infobox which don't satisfy Wikipedia's accessibility guidelines. The contrast between the foreground colour and the background colour is low, which means that it may be difficult or impossible for people with visual impairments to read it.
To correct this problem, a group of editors have decided to remove support for invalid colours from Template:Infobox television season and other television season templates after 1 September 2015. If you would still like to use custom colours for the infobox and episode list in this article after that date, please ensure that the colours meet the WCAG AAA standard.
To test whether a colour combination is AAA-compliant you can use Snook's colour contrast tool. If your background colour is dark, then please test it against a foreground colour of "FFFFFF" (white). If it is light, please test it against a foreground colour of "000000" (black). The tool needs to say "YES" in the box for "WCAG 2 AAA Compliant" when you input the foreground and the background colour. You can generally make your colour compliant by adjusting the "Value (%)" fader in the middle box.
Please be sure to change the invalid colour in every place that it appears, including the infobox, the episode list, and the series overview table. If you have any questions about this, please ask on Template talk:Infobox television season. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:30, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colour contrast problems 
Talk:List of The Daily Show episodes (2002)

message: It seems that this article is using colours in the infobox which don't satisfy Wikipedia's accessibility guidelines. The contrast between the foreground colour and the background colour is low, which means that it may be difficult or impossible for people with visual impairments to read it.
To correct this problem, a group of editors have decided to remove support for invalid colours from Template:Infobox television season and other television season templates after 1 September 2015. If you would still like to use custom colours for the infobox and episode list in this article after that date, please ensure that the colours meet the WCAG AAA standard.
To test whether a colour combination is AAA-compliant you can use Snook's colour contrast tool. If your background colour is dark, then please test it against a foreground colour of "FFFFFF" (white). If it is light, please test it against a foreground colour of "000000" (black). The tool needs to say "YES" in the box for "WCAG 2 AAA Compliant" when you input the foreground and the background colour. You can generally make your colour compliant by adjusting the "Value (%)" fader in the middle box.
Please be sure to change the invalid colour in every place that it appears, including the infobox, the episode list, and the series overview table. If you have any questions about this, please ask on Template talk:Infobox television season. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:30, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colour contrast problems 
Talk:List of The Daily Show episodes (2006)

message: It seems that this article is using colours in the infobox which don't satisfy Wikipedia's accessibility guidelines. The contrast between the foreground colour and the background colour is low, which means that it may be difficult or impossible for people with visual impairments to read it.
To correct this problem, a group of editors have decided to remove support for invalid colours from Template:Infobox television season and other television season templates after 1 September 2015. If you would still like to use custom colours for the infobox and episode list in this article after that date, please ensure that the colours meet the WCAG AAA standard.
To test whether a colour combination is AAA-compliant you can use Snook's colour contrast tool. If your background colour is dark, then please test it against a foreground colour of "FFFFFF" (white). If it is light, please test it against a foreground colour of "000000" (black). The tool needs to say "YES" in the box for "WCAG 2 AAA Compliant" when you input the foreground and the background colour. You can generally make your colour compliant by adjusting the "Value (%)" fader in the middle box.
Please be sure to change the invalid colour in every place that it appears, including the infobox, the episode list, and the series overview table. If you have any questions about this, please ask on Template talk:Infobox television season. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:30, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colour contrast problems 
Talk:List of The Daily Show episodes (2005)

message: It seems that this article is using colours in the infobox which don't satisfy Wikipedia's accessibility guidelines. The contrast between the foreground colour and the background colour is low, which means that it may be difficult or impossible for people with visual impairments to read it.
To correct this problem, a group of editors have decided to remove support for invalid colours from Template:Infobox television season and other television season templates after 1 September 2015. If you would still like to use custom colours for the infobox and episode list in this article after that date, please ensure that the colours meet the WCAG AAA standard.
To test whether a colour combination is AAA-compliant you can use Snook's colour contrast tool. If your background colour is dark, then please test it against a foreground colour of "FFFFFF" (white). If it is light, please test it against a foreground colour of "000000" (black). The tool needs to say "YES" in the box for "WCAG 2 AAA Compliant" when you input the foreground and the background colour. You can generally make your colour compliant by adjusting the "Value (%)" fader in the middle box.
Please be sure to change the invalid colour in every place that it appears, including the infobox, the episode list, and the series overview table. If you have any questions about this, please ask on Template talk:Infobox television season. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:30, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colour contrast problems 
Talk:List of The Daily Show episodes (2003)

message: It seems that this article is using colours in the infobox which don't satisfy Wikipedia's accessibility guidelines. The contrast between the foreground colour and the background colour is low, which means that it may be difficult or impossible for people with visual impairments to read it.
To correct this problem, a group of editors have decided to remove support for invalid colours from Template:Infobox television season and other television season templates after 1 September 2015. If you would still like to use custom colours for the infobox and episode list in this article after that date, please ensure that the colours meet the WCAG AAA standard.
To test whether a colour combination is AAA-compliant you can use Snook's colour contrast tool. If your background colour is dark, then please test it against a foreground colour of "FFFFFF" (white). If it is light, please test it against a foreground colour of "000000" (black). The tool needs to say "YES" in the box for "WCAG 2 AAA Compliant" when you input the foreground and the background colour. You can generally make your colour compliant by adjusting the "Value (%)" fader in the middle box.
Please be sure to change the invalid colour in every place that it appears, including the infobox, the episode list, and the series overview table. If you have any questions about this, please ask on Template talk:Infobox television season. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:30, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colour contrast problems 
Talk:USS Odax

message: Odax was one of the two original GUPPY conversions.  The other was . These conversions were called "GUPPY I", and both boats were later upgraded to "GUPPY II" spec.  Unfortunately I don't have much info on the GUPPY I conversion, so I just put the GUPPY II stats in the infobox.  If I get more information later I'll try to create a GUPPY I section of the box. TomTheHand (talk) 16:21, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  GUPPY conversion
Talk:USS Requin

message: The article says “She had an additional five-inch/25-caliber deck gun, as well as two 24-tube five-inch (127 mm) rocket launchers.
I can find no references to the united states ever using a five-inch rocket. However, the M16 (rocket)  appears to be similar in every way, even being the latest in rocket launcher technology at the time of Requin’s launch,   but that it fires a four point five inch rocket. Did we perhaps loose a word somewhere? Or is their a navy artillery rocket that isn’t listed?
71.31.176.253 (talk) 13:42, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Juanjo García Granero

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Elli (talk | contribs) 04:02, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Juan José García Granero →  – WP:COMMONNAME is "Juanjo García Granero" or just "Juan García Granero", doesn't use middle name professionally. Some sources: 1, 2, 3, Ortizesp (talk) 01:12, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

text: Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. GiantSnowman 10:38, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 4 June 2021
Talk:Juan Luis Mora (footballer, born 1973)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure)  BegbertBiggs (talk) 17:02, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. GiantSnowman 14:09, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 2 January 2021