Talk:Negation (comics)

message: Is there a more detailed account of the plot anywhere? The page here is so short its useless. Maybe someone could add to it?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.72.228.218 (talk) 10:24, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

message: In October 2004, writer Tony Bedard was quoted laying out a design for the future of the characters which can be found here.
Most of the cast struck out on their own before NEGATION WAR. I envisioned them settling down happily on some backwater planet in Negation Space and living in peace. I figured Mercer Drake was shacking up with Shassa and Corrin while Westin and Captain Fluxor fought over Thustra, only to lose out to Monchito. Meanwhile, in the Bright Universe, Kaine and Lizard Lady recruit the Saurians, and Liz hooks up with Tchlusarud, who, although he was nicknamed "Loser", was the best character in SIGIL. Kaine and Komptin team up again when Kaine gives Komptin his Kaliman retriever puppy Chomper to replace Komptin's dead dog. The war would end when they lure Charon and Danik to that hellish corner of Negation Space known as Perdition (yes, the same Perdition from ROUTE 666). They set off Appolyon's "soul bomb", which turns Charon and Danik back into ordinary humans. Kaine then beats them both senseless with a toilet (it's part of the space debris glimpsed in NEGATION WAR after that superhero guy's world is destroyed). Kaine then leaves Danik and Charon to Komptin's tender mercies. If any publishing had resumed after the war, Kaine would've tracked down the other guys and they would've had to free Negation Space from an unleashed Appolyon.
If this is true, then damn CrossGen woulda been cool. Savre 08:31, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Intresting...What could have been

message: "Additionally, two more books were announced but never released due to CrossGen's bankruptcy"
The two books are on Amazon shipping sometime in May 2007, whats up with this? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.27.188.108 (talk) 05:59, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Books? 

message: :Image:Negation 0.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 19:20, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Negation 0.jpg