Talk:Dynamic web page

message: I came to this page because I read the advantages in the article of Static web page to be cache-friendly and wanted to learn how this would be with Dynamic web page and why. Well, this piece of information seems missing here. 
Would anyone help adding some information about how dynamic web page is related with cache functionality?
Thanks. -- 06:22, 17 January 2009 (61.62.133.96)
: Both static and dynamic web pages can be updated. As far as I know, the HTTP protocol does not discriminate between dynamic and static pages. IvarTJ (talk) 18:45, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes, I can confirm that even dynamic content can be cached; it suffices to add some HTTP headers (e.g. "Last-Modified", "ETag", "Expires", "Cache-Control", etc.) to responses and of course to manage HTTP headers "if-modified-since" and "if-none-match" found in client request in order to return a 304 status code (without body content) instead of 200 (see also RFC 7234). Ade56facc 10:09, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is Dynamic web page cache-friendly? 

message: The current explanation is highly misleading: "Dynamic" may indeed refer to
interactivity; however, typically, it refers to the differentiation into
static and dynamically generated pages (Wikipedia is, probably, an example
of the former, as are many apparently statical websites based on a CMS).
Another common meaning is "uses DHTML", which also does not (automatically)
imply interactivity.
I suggested that the page be correspondingly rewritten to discuss primarily
static vs. dynamically generated pages, with interactivity as an example of
application of the latter, with an additional part discussing DHTML and related
themes.
88.77.132.42 (talk) 23:15, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misleading explanation 

message: Wrong concept: "In dynamic sites page content and page layout are created separately" (see hist). 
CSS or HTML layout can supplied with the text and 
another HTML elements. It is a webdesign decision, not a "server-side" or "client-side" architecture decision. 
For web-design decisions see Separation of presentation and content and Web_template.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.95.148.14 (talk) 12:15, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong concept 

message: (to be a sub-page)
== To improve the overall credibility and authoritative character of this article ==
PLEASE ADD OR VOTE the better choices for citing sources on this article:
# The Information Revolution
# Learning VBScript
# New Techniques and Technologies for Statistics II
=== Sources Candidates ===
About Dynamic Web Pages history:
 Title: The Information Revolution
 ISBN: 0976385740
 Publisher: Ironbound Press
 Author(s): J. R. Okin
 Publication Date: Dec 1, 2005
 Pages:350
Old, first books or articles about Dynamic Web Pages:
 Title: Learning VBScript
 ISBN: 1565
 Publisher: O'Reilly
 Author(s): Paul Lomax
 Publication Date: Jul 1, 1997
 Pages: 614
 see C. 13
 Title: New Techniques and Technologies for Statistics II
 ISBN: 9051993269
 Publisher: IOS Press
 Author(s): European Communities
 Publication Date: Jul 1, 1997
 Pages: 288
 Pag. 194
== Invented and patented??? ==
 ON "Dynamic web pages where invented and patented in 1994 by Gary Kremen founder of Match.Com and Sex.Com".
Perhaps at USA people can patent public domain (like Dynamic web pages or genes) and post-invent public standards (CGI in this case).
:Sugestion for new text,  moved from User:Gkremen (Gary Kremen?) change... and need reliable sources:
:According to the US patent office, Gary Kremen is the primary inventor of a patent for creating dynamic web pages, patent #5706434 
:* he resold for over $1,250,000  
:* "Integrated request-response system and method generating responses to request objects formatted according to various communication protocols" http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/5706434.html
: -- Gkremen.
== intro-tobe?? ==
It is not a dictionary, for "fast definition". Dynamic web page need a CAREFUL definition because people DO MISTAKES (a lot of!)... and the Lead Section "Establish context", "Provide an accessible overview" and give "Relative emphasis" to the 3 main points (Client-side, Server-side and mix=Ajax).
Please, talk here first, it is not a "intro-tobe" case.
--Krauss (talk) 18:28, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  OLD discussions in a subpage 

message: It is not a dictionary, for "fast definition". Dynamic web page need a CAREFUL definition because people DO MISTAKES (a lot of!)... and the Lead Section "Establish context", "Provide an accessible overview" and give "Relative emphasis" to the 3 main points (Client-side, Server-side and mix=Ajax).
Please, talk here first, it is not a "intro-tobe" case.
--Krauss (talk) 18:28, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  intro-tobe?? 

message: I have stumbled upon the mistake of calling ASP.NET a programming language a couple of times in this article. This information is misleading as ASP.NET is not a programming language, rather a framework on which multiple programming languages called  Common Intermediate Language can run. C# for instance is one of those languages. If not opposition is there, I will modify those information. --Broosk (talk) 03:07, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  ASP.NET is not a programming language 

message: Usually perform the main work in a web server 105.112.189.140 (talk) 03:16, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Php 

message: Should this page be reworded to clarify that Flash is no longer frequently used? MaferPues (talk) 15:25, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flash is dead