Talk:WGNO

message: :Image:Wgno07SMALL.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 19:54, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Wgno07SMALL.JPG

message: even though the press release (Tribune.com) states starting September 29, 2008 WGNO was startng a thirty minute newscast at 11:30 AM.  The newscast actually runs at 11:00 AM and started airing before the September 29th date.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.105.50.113 (talk) 03:56, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  error in time for week day newscast 

message: "WNOL is the senior partner in the duopoly because of its network affiliate history.[citation needed] In other Tribune duopolies, a Big Four affiliate is usually the senior partner.["
This statement does not seem to be supported by facts.  Please note that in area of news all expansion of newscast occures on ABC26 not WNOL-TV.  In fact ABC26 is producing the newscast for WNOL at 9:00PM each weeknight.
68.105.50.113 (talk) 16:34, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  following statement should be removed 

message: *Removed Maria Vallejo - She is not an employee she is a Freelancer James45nd
*Phil Waterman was let go April 8, 2010 ***Source local contact and confirmation from www.newsblues.com James45nd  —Preceding undated comment added 16:37, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  error in News Staff 

message: Since WGNO and WNOL transmitters and attennas are located on the WDSU tower and in the WDSU transmitter building, shouldn't they all have the same cooridnates.  As of June 20, 2009, Wikipedia show different locations for WGNO and WNOL.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.204.152.47 (talk) 15:33, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is transmitter coordinates correct? 

message: Shouldn't this article be focused on the current WGNO news staff. The Former news-staff section is longer than half the article. Personally, I believe that only "notable" individuals worthy of their own article should be listed here. Right now, this section just seems like a person tracker that's honestly not relevant to the article. Samwisep86 (talk) 19:27, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello, Wikipedia policy is very clear on the point that the onus is on the person who adds (or re-adds) material to an article to provide references to demonstrate things like notability and appropriateness for inclusion in the article; not the other way around. thanks Deconstructhis (talk) 02:05, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Former News Staff

message: Hello, Please do not add unreferenced names as entries to the list of former employees in articles. Including this type of material in articles does not abide by current consensus and its inclusion is strongly discouraged in our policies and guidelines. The rationales are as follows:
#WP:NOT tells us, Wikipedia is "not an indiscriminate collection of information."  As that section describes, just because something is true, doesn't necessarily mean the info belongs in Wikipedia.  
#As per WP:V, we cannot include information in Wikipedia that is not verifiable and sourced. 
# WP:Source list tells us that lists included within articles (including people's names) are subject to the same need for references as any other information in the article. 
#Per WP:BLP, we have to be especially careful about including un-sourced info about living persons.
If you look at articles about companies in general, you will not find mention of previous employees, except in those cases where the employee was particularly notable.  Even then, the information is not presented just as a list of names, but is incorporated into the text itself (for example, when a company's article talks about the policies a previous CEO had, or when they mention the discovery/invention of a former engineer/researcher). If a preexisting article is already in the encyclopedia for the person you want to add to a list, it's generally regarded as sufficient to support their inclusion in list material in another article. cheers  Deconstructhis (talk) 00:13, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding unreferenced entries of former employees to lists containing BLP material