lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Home Army (disambiguation)

message: Ok, the term "Home Army" might've been used by other military units than the Polish Home Army but:
* Home Army of Norway returns only this article (and two copies)
* Norwegian Home Army - 2 hits
* American Home Army - only this article (and 2 copies)
* Hungarian Home Army - 1 hit (plus this article and copies)
* Only the Dutch Home Army returns with 7 hits.
Compare it to the Polish Home Army which returns 2,880 hits. Perhaps this article should really be a redirect to Armia Krajowa and the others be placed under a Home Army (disambiguation), if anyone can confirm that those units really existed. Halibutt 22:06, Oct 2, 2004 (UTC)
::So, did those units really exist? Halibutt 21:15, May 30, 2005 (UTC)
:::Anyone? Halibutt 07:48, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Part of the problem is that the names of smaller resistance groups/paramilitaries are often translated a number of different ways into english. I think often they are called "Home Army" after the Polish even though "Home Army" is not the literal translation of the native name. heqs 06:19, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Dispute

message: Perhaps this should be merged with Home Guard?  shows the UK Home Guard as the "Home Army" 70.55.85.40 (talk) 07:56, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Definitely ... it does the same job but better, and readers would more easily find the article they want. Abtract (talk) 08:07, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

text: Indeed, but merging into Home Guard would achieve that. Abtract (talk) 13:09, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I haven't done a lot of merging, so I'm not sure, but I think Home Army (disambiguation) would become a redirect to Home Guard, wouldn't it?  That seems messy to me for some reason. Could it maybe be deleted after the merge? SlackerMom (talk) 13:25, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge with [[Home Guard]]
Talk:Belle de Jour (film)

message: This film is enormously multi-layered and allusive, and quite an important film in cinema history; it needs a much larger article. -- Karada 12:09, 3 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Go for it, dude! Ellsworth 22:11, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: This film

message: When I saw the movie, I interpreted the whipping/rape in the forest, and the scene where the men fling mud on her, as "flash-forwards" - actual events that happen subsequent to the husband discovering his wife's infidelity. glasperlenspiel 19:04, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dreams or actual events of punishment? 

message: Shouldn't this be located at Belle de Jour, in accordance with capitalization conventions and MOS:CL? Waqcku 21:32, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, because French capitalization works different than English. In French, titles only have capital letter on the first one unless there is a proper name, e.g. Cyrano de Bergerac.--Nauki (talk) 00:33, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalization 

message: What about goofs?
When she is with the professor, she takes her bra off. Then she leaves the room without it, you can see it on the bed. Then, next scene, she's got it on.--Nauki (talk) 00:34, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Goofs 

message: I would like people's opinions of this disambig. The vast number of links to Belle de jour point to the Luis Buñuel film. Should the disambig page be moved to Belle de Jour (disambiguation) with the film kept at the page Belle de jour? - AKeen (talk) 15:19, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambig Question 

message: I've changed it to point out its ambiguity. The previous version incorrectly classed it as Séverine's daydream. It is well-known that neither Buñuel nor Carrière were really "sure" what was going on and which scenes were "real" and which ones were "dreams". They also changed their opinions over the years regarding particular scenes. The ending can be interpreted in many ways:
an imagined scene, a daydream,
reality, and Marcel's wounding of Pierre was her fantasy,
reality, Pierre is miraculously healed (the camera suddenly and unexpectedly tilting down to Pierre's hand is an image from Christian iconography symbolising God's intervention; this also agrees with the sound of cowbells associated with extraordinary events in several of Buñuel's films),
and so on.
JanBielawski (talk) 06:04, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changed the description of the ending a bit
Talk:Lead(II) sulfide

message: Need clarification for disambig purposes.
One sentence in this article reads:
:"Cooling the PbS elements by for example pressurised or liquid gas or a Peltier system shifts it's sensitivity to wavelength of approximately 2 to 4 μm."
Is the Peltier system referred to here a reference to the Peltier-Seebeck effect? Or some other usage of the term Peltier, not yet documented in Wikipedia?
The link points to a disambig page; unsure what it is supposed to be pointing to.
Kevyn 12:12, 3 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Peltier system?

message: When refractive index, n, is quoted, a wavelength should also be quoted, as n is a function of wavelength. Jaraalbe 06:50, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Refractive index
Talk:Battle of the Cowshed

message: Keep
From VfD:
Should be pretty obvious. A spoof of Animal Farm that has no place here. Possible candinate for Bad Jokes And Other Deleted Nonsense. -- Kizor 12:35, 3 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: VfD 3 Aug 2004

message: What did you mean with the "current command structure of the farm"? Did you mean who was currently in charge?- B-101 19:26, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: command structure

message: My reading of the book leads me to understand that the man that Boxer hits in the head lays "lifeless" on the ground, but he is not actually dead.  We are left to understand that Boxer believes that he has killed him, however quite soon afterward the book states that the man has disappeared - leading me to believe that he appeared lifeless, but actually was knocked unconscious - not killed.  If anyone else agrees, we should ammend the table to the side that indicates that one human was killed.
*Yes, you're right. I have changed it. Eric119 01:22, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Human Casuality
Talk:Namesdays in Finland

message: Eequor, please sign and date, don't make us go to the History to see who's talking and when. User:Andris copied the statement in Namesdays in Sweden about namesdays being almost as important as birthdays (which is untrue about Sweden and untrue here), into this article on 10 Aug, and User:Jniemenmaa modified it for being untrue. I think that was too cautious, and am removing the sentence about birthdays altogether. This article obviously has more serious problems, but still. Bishonen 20:51, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment above, and birthdays

message: I have merged Namesdays in Sweden with Namesdays in Finland under the new title Namesdays and made the original articles into redirects.  The new article needs further editing by people who understand the subject area better, as I was unsure about which elements were specific to a particular country, and which were more general in nature.  Please continue all discussions about these articles on Talk:Namesdays --HappyDog 19:27, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirection
Talk:Family and consumer sciences

message: Article merged: See old talk-page here.Klbrain (talk) 00:00, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: 2015 merge

message: The commercial cooking section has clearly been taken from somewhere else, by the looks of it the promotional material from some sort of cookery course in Canada. It looks to be neither original nor particularly relevent to the page. 128.232.133.1 (talk) 09:35, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Commercial Cooking

message: The newly created article Home Science seems to be nothing but a different term for Home economics, and I suggest that it be merged to this article. We do not need two articles about the same subject. Edison (talk) 04:12, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal

message: Some initial improvements made to include information on pioneer in field and formation of key US organization. Article still needs major improvements, including additional historical information on the development of the field of domestic science into home economics and beyond, scope of field, checks for accuracy, etc. Other additions could include details surrounding the selection of the term "home economics" to describe the field.
Naranjaa (talk) 21:03, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needed improvements
Talk:Thigh

message: Maybe I'm wrong, but shouldn't there be something about the sexual nature of the thighs, or about how they are secondary sexual features?— Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.141.3.45 (talk • contribs) 16:59, 26 February 2006‎ (UTC)
Agreed, This article needs more pictures!!!— Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.108.154.59 (talk • contribs) 20:33, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sexual Nature 

message: I've read that as well as being divided into inner and outer thighs, the thighs can also be divided into front and rear thighs. If so, something about this needs to be mentioned in the article. Gringo300 07:10, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: front and rear thighs

message: There should be a reference or link here to thigh meat in animals (e.g. chicken, turkey) - the only article I can find that mentions it is white meat (which has a redirect from dark meat). — sjorford++ 10:21, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thigh meat 

message: The first picture in the article appears to be explicit. Is this an issue? 71.123.156.73 (talk) 19:16, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: It certainly bothers me. I look up "thigh" and suddenly I see a penis? I feel that the genitalia should be blurred out or a different picture used altogher. Morncreek (talk) 07:19, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  I agree, and additionally I don't think this is a very good image. If you could find another image hosted here or on Wikimedia commons and replace it, I'd be very grateful. I will ping , who is another user who has a penchant for finding aesthetically pleasing images.--LT910001 (talk) 06:35, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm having a hard time finding a more pleasing picture that displays the thigh in a anatomically correct way. That doesn't mean I won't, and it is on my list of things to do. CFCF (talk · contribs · email) 21:31, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explicit picture 

message: Is a picture of a prostitute really required in an article about the thigh?  
I've removed it as it seems completely irrelevant and was'nt even referred to in the text.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.88.95.43 (talk) 12:44, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prostitute
Talk:American History X

message: A disagreement exists between editors as to whether this film should be included in the category :Category:Neo-Nazism in the United States.  One side feels that the inclusion is warranted because Neo-Nazism in the United States is the subject of the film, the other side feels that the inclusion is not warranted because the film is fiction and not a documentary.
What do other editors think? Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:59, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: *As I said, we do not include works of fiction in "...in the United States" categories because such categories are designed for real events. Pretty Woman is not in the category :Category:Sexual harassment in the United States even though it depicts sexual harassment, nor is 12 Years a Slave in the category :Category:Racism in the United States even though it depicts racism. No matter how long this article has been in this category, putting it there was a mistake. - MagicatthemovieS — Preceding unsigned comment added by MagicatthemovieS (talk • contribs) 20:03, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: *Who is this "we" you speak of, and can you please provide a pointer to a policy that covers what you claim is the case? Thanks. Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:09, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Editorial dispute regarding categories
Talk:Supercow

message: From VfD:
Entire article text: Superhero alter-ego of Cow from Cow and Chicken, a Cartoon Network show of the late 1990s.
Inexplicably speaks Spanish. Catchphrase: "!Supercow al rescate¡"''
*Merge into Cow and Chicken, then delete redirect. - UtherSRG 16:22, 3 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Marital rape

message: — Assignment last updated by Nyxtingale (talk) 16:44, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: History of Sexuality

message: The above sentence was picked up from the 4th paragraph of the top of the article.
Although rape being obviously a despicable and heinous crime, including marital rape, it is not clear at all in the article, what level of low level of punishment is considered for marital rape when comparing to common standard rape by unknown people, i.e., when the raper is a stranger?
Does - in Western countries for example - marital rape have the same legal punishment as any other rape (raper being a stranger)? Strictly legally speaking, does the marriage provide any sort of mitigating factor? 
A further explanation/topic in the article would be useful, considered the article is very complete and well comprehensive.
Thank you João Pimentel Ferreira (talk) 10:57, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "albeit at a lower level of punishment"
Talk:Sexuality (disambiguation)

message: In my opinion it is absolutely ridiculous to have this redirect to human sexuality.  Have we decided that animal sexuality is a completely irrelevant subject?  --Daniel C. Boyer 16:33, 3 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: However, I would say that there are several more links intended for Human sexuality than Animal sexuality. Mynameisnotpj (talk) 05:08, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: redirect

message: Removed link to Transsexuality. Despite word ending, transsexuality is a gender identity and NOT a sexuality (note its absence from the article on Sexual Orientation). The "sex" in "transsexual" refers to gender, not sexual attraction; its closest related sexuality/sexual philia is autogynephilia, which is not the same thing at all. Surprised that this appears to have gone unnoticed for so long. Thysien 16:18, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've re-added in See also section with context. If it was added once its value and inclusion seems worthy of a short explanation and mnany probably need to learn the distinction. Benjiboi 10:09, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Transsexuality

message: --94.97.242.115 (talk) 12:21, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  f 

message: The Oxford English Dictionary gives the definition for sexuality as  
#"The quality of being sexual or possessing sex." 
##"Sex as a property of reproductive cells, rather than individual organisms." (rare)
#"Sexual nature, instinct, or feelings; the possession or expression of these." 
#"Recognition of or preoccupation with what is sexual." (nonce-use)
#"A (humorous) remark of a sexual nature; a sexual pleasantry." (nonce-use)
#"A person's sexual identity in relation to the gender to which he or she is typically attracted; the fact of being heterosexual, homosexual, or bisexual; sexual orientation."
#"Appearance distinctive of sex." (rare)
OED defines nonce-use as "on one specific occasion or in one specific text or writer's works." We should lead with the most widely-accepted meaning. I have updated the first line accordingly. Jokestress (talk) 18:01, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  OED
Talk:Tolkienist

message: Is this really such a well-known or universal term? (If it is, can I see some evidence? I only found about 2,000 references on Google , most of which were duplicates of this article or else from non-English sites. There were over 18,000 for "Tolkien fan". ) I think I qualify as a member of the group described, and I've rarely encountered it. (My personal experience has been that we do not have a single term of choice for "Tolkien fan". I don't like implying that this is the universal term.) Aranel 16:43, 3 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Crackhead

message: From VfD:
Very short dictionary definition.  Don't see potential article here. Gwimpey 16:53, Aug 3, 2004 (UTC)
*I think we need something here. I've rewritten the article, since I couldn't think of any one thing to redirect to (drug addiction? crack cocaine?). Either keep and expand this version, or redirect somewhere. Meelar (talk) 17:06, 2004 Aug 3 (UTC)
*Keep the rewrite.  Hmm, something about what crack does to people to make them seem unusual?  Aside from being addicted and desperate, they act manic, jittery, and wild, so they stand out even among drug abusers.  Alas, I have had the experience of being around some. Geogre 17:32, 3 Aug 2004 (UTC)

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot 04:22, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-02-1 Automated pywikipediabot message
Talk:Presbyterium

message: For a more thorough discussion, see http://www.geocities.com/frcoulter/presbyterium/chapter1.html. 
The concept of presbyterium is one that originated in the early church and expressed the collegiality of the presbyteroi (priests) with their overseer, or episkopoi (bishop). As Father Coulter notes in his paper, the post-conciliar Roman Catholic Church after 1962, sought to recover its early roots where collaborative ministry and collegiality were the norm.  Given the current curial structure administration in the Vatican, it appears that any term that lends credence to the notion of collegiality and collaboration in ordained ministry is viewed rather unfavorably. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aloysius Patacsil (talk • contribs) 17:55, 3 August 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Two Trees

message: There's another article on the same topic at Two Trees of Valinor. They  need to be merged. Which should be kept and which should be the redirect? (Personally, I would keep "Two Trees of Valinor", as just "Two Trees" could really refer to just about anything. But "Two Trees" is older and should perhaps have precedence.)
There is actual concrete evidence for the theory that the light of the Two Trees does not behave like "normal" light, considering that it fell from the trees in the form of dew and was stored in vats. This is all in The Silmarillion. Aranel 18:09, 3 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: The longer name, I think. I have a vague memory of a real-world place in the western US called "Two Trees", and the longer name makes it clearly in the Tolkien department. Stan 21:02, 3 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ecology

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians! I have just created a new WikiProject, WikiProject Fossorials. If you can, please join, as we are in desperate need of members! Fossorials are animals that spend much of their time underground in burrows, which is a way they interact with their environment, so if you are interested, please join!
Thank you, UserMemer (chat) Tribs 00:34, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fossorials! 

message: Hello,Please note that Carbon source (biology), which is within this project's scope, has been selected as one of the Articles for improvement. The article is scheduled to appear on Wikipedia's Community portal in the "Articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing! 
Delivered by — MusikBot talk 00:05, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement! 

message: Invasive species has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 22:25, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good article reassessment for [[Invasive species]] 

message: There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Rewilding (conservation biology)#Requested move 4 March 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 15:09, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move at [[Talk:Rewilding (conservation biology)#Requested move 4 March 2024]]
Talk:Unemployment

message: The redirect Male unemployment has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Steel1943 (talk) 20:38, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Male unemployment]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect Mancession has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Steel1943 (talk) 20:43, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Mancession]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect Job loss has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Steel1943 (talk) 20:51, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Job loss]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect Job creation has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Steel1943 (talk) 21:50, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Job creation]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: — Assignment last updated by Hachaudhari (talk) 22:45, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Community Economic and Social Development II
Talk:SMSQ/E

message: To the anonymous poster who created the original article: Sorry, but Wikipedia is not for first-person tales. If you believe this topic deserves more information in the form of an article, we would love to have it, of course - but it needs to be in the form of an encyclopedia article. - DavidWBrooks 20:49, 3 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled