Talk:Iveco

message: I was wondering why no mention of use of Iveco's vehicles as execution vans in China is allowed on this page?  Is this page merely a corporate puff piece for the company, or is it part of an encyclopaedia?
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/China/HG21Ad01.html
http://www.stagg.hk/wp-content/uploads/2006/11/van-large.jpg
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Execution_van   -- Anonymous
Wouldn't it be nice if t you just added this information? There seems to be nothing to indicate that this topic has been avoided, merely neglected. --Larssl (talk) 13:54, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The page is not a company page. Anyway you just spoke about the norvegian claims without any attention if it was a reasonable claim. I think that it is not legally correct ti report a not verified information, damaging a trade mark on an encyclopaedia.
Marco  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 160.220.151.48 (talk) 10:25, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Above statement about damaging a trade mark after stating it is not a company page  Marc would  cause me to wounder about a possible COI from editors who dont sign posts and  are using IP addresses. BulldozerD11 (talk) 00:26, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversy?

message: Surely some mention should be made of Iveco's connection with Ford's European truck-building operations?  --RFBailey 14:03, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Have to agree that article strangly makes no reference to Ford Origin of Cargo and latter JV before Ford sold out to Iveco other than model title "Iveco Ford Eurocargo". Whole history section looks as if lifted from corporate literature due to advert/PR like text. BulldozerD11 (talk) 00:26, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ford 

message: :Image:IVECO logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 11:55, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:IVECO logo.jpg

message: I added this topic here in the English Wikipedia based on the fact that the controversy regards the use of vehicles in Afganistan, which makes it an international case. It is unfortunate that the sources are only in Norwegian however, so please supply any English sources that you may come across. --Larssl (talk) 14:00, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy regarding Iveco LMV's performance in Afganistan 

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests February 2012 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant 
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 11:43, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Bucharest Iveco bus 1.jpg Nominated for Deletion

message: Hi all. I am going to work on this article as it is lacking in my view. The history is poor, Brands are a miscellaneous and there is nothing on new developments. I am working and reading a lot of references to make a good article. Suggestions?? I already noted down the Ford one here above. Thanks. - Smagliola (talk) 17:44, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Improvements

message: Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted.
Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia.
This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link.
If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting.
If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page.
If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta.
When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags.
The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true.
Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
*http://www.army-technology.com/contractors/vehicles/iveco/
*:Triggered by \barmy-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 12:26, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page 

message: I decided to use a named account. I have edited this article as 103.6.219.2. Thanx. Happytraveler123 (talk) 23:32, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Decided to use a named account to avoid confusion 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Iveco. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080907183638/http://www.iveco.com/ to https://www.iveco.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:34, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Estes camiones y vehiculos son de muy buena calidad,comprarlos por favor.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.27.25.184 (talk) 17:52, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Iveco  

message: Hi, I suggest to apply changes on the page since there are several inaccuracies.
The main topic is the overlapping between information about IVECO as a brand and Iveco Group as a holding company.
IVECO is one of the Iveco Group brands and manufactures light, medium and heavy commercial vehicles.
On the other hand, Iveco Group is composed of several brands such as IVECO, FPT Industrial, HEULIEZ to name a few.
I alreday created a draft about the Group page, I think we can discuss together to find the proper solution.
Gianmaria V (talk) 14:33, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @Gianmaria V since you are getting no responses even though it has been several days, you might wish to look at the WP:RFC route, If you choose to do this you have my permission to remove this comment, which adds no value to an RFC discussion. FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 17:58, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

text: @User:Timtrent Hi, thanks, I am gonna do it right now Gianmaria V (talk) 10:24, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page split - IVECO and Iveco Group 

message: The page is a mix of contents between IVECO brand and Iveco Group holding company. I suggest to create a new holding page and edit the current page in order to make clear that this is the page of the brand (IVECO). Gianmaria V (talk) 10:30, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Support. Proposed change seems likely to clarify matters. See Volkswagen / Volkswagen Group for a prominent precedent. Regulov (talk) 12:45, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfC about content review