lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Clef

message: There is another form, in which the K-like hooks of one form of the C clef are overlaid onto the G-clef. It's U+E056 in SMuFL. Double sharp (talk) 15:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Link doesn’t work Skysong263 (talk) 13:49, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Try this: SmuFL Clefs —Wahoofive (talk) 00:57, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Octave treble clef 

message: Whatever happened to "Every Good Boy Deserves Fun?" Is that no longer true these days? 2600:4041:D5:D600:C00:4B7D:96EE:7E73 (talk) 21:18, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I've never heard that one. I always used "Every Green Bug Detests Finland". Ravishsingh00724 (talk) 01:04, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: More of a "Every Granite Billboard Denounces Freedom" guy myself. Aza24 (talk) 06:25, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

text: Is that some sort of incel slogan? —Wahoofive (talk) 20:38, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good Boys 

message: At least as late as 1924’s first printing of Arrigo Boito’s Nerone, Ricordi used as a sub-octave tenor clef, a G clef on the left, and the right part of the old C clef () on the right.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by John W. Kennedy (talk • contribs) 20:20, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another sub-octave tenor clef 

message: Instruments that transpose at the octave do not normally use an octave clef, and I'm pretty sure this is considered incorrect these days.  They may have been notated that way sometimes, but I don't really know if/why/when, so maybe someone who actually knows about this can clear that up. - Special-T (talk) 17:35, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: We don't generally decide what's "incorrect" here on WP, but I think it's safe to say such usage is unusual, even for tenor voice parts. In fact, I can't think of any situation where such clefs are used a majority of the time.  —Wahoofive (talk) 02:37, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transposing instruments and octave clefs 

message: Under 'Neutral clef', the 'Simple quadruple drum pattern' is shown as having a repeat sign on the bar. This is not reflected in the attached audio file below the image.
Perhaps appropriate action would be to place a <score> in it's place, using WikiMedia's musical syntax. However my skills in using the <score> tags are not sufficient to make the change myself. RazzerMatazzer (talk) 02:12, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consider modifying the first drum pattern in Neutral clef. 

message: This seems to have been written and/or edited by people who completely understand the topic. Sadly, it does not really explain it well enough for someone like me, who knows naff all about music theory but came here to learn. The text talks about locking a note to the stave, but the examples given don't match up to the diagrams as far as I can tell: the notes listed are in different positions for the different clefs. Please can someone clever do a bit more re-writing to explain what is going on, Music Theory 101 if you like? Richard Peers
:Are you maybe looking for some diagrams like this? They might be clearer and more helpful. - Special-T (talk) 17:12, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Simpler explanation?
Talk:Pizzicato

message: Even if a piece is pizzicato throughout, I'm fairly certain the player will still hold the instrument in the upright position, unless it's specifically called for by the composer as mentioned in the passage about the "quasi guitara" section. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 63.163.61.3 (talk) 14:10, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guitar-style by players of bowed instruments 

message: Unless I am missing something, isn't paragraph two and three of Other pizzicato techniques about the same thing? Seems like the Revision as of 2008-11-04T02:48:23 is what changed this. Khrister (talk) 23:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lefthanded pizzicato 

message: Why and where does this article need additional citations for verification? What references does it need and how should they be added? Hyacinth (talk) 10:12, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Everywhere except the lead. For why and how see for example Help:Introduction to referencing/1. WikiHannibal (talk) 22:12, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional citations

message: Was Mahler the first composer to call for the Bartok pizzicato technique? PhilUK (talk) 20:58, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Bowed string instrument extended technique says that he was. PhilUK (talk) 21:04, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Mahler
Talk:Gas sculpture

message: This article looks like a similar sort of thing to Four dimensional painting - if this is all there is to say about it, I don't think it should be an article at all. If Miro is the only artist to have proposed/written about this, then the info should really be in the Miro page, IMO. It's silly to have articles about every idea every person ever has, especially if there's nothing to be said about them beyond "Person X had idea Y". --Camembert
:These should both be on the Miro page where they have some context and don't just seem like hot air (little art joke there).  Ortolan88
::With the recent update this page might be worth keeping as separate.  --141.219.41.163 19:57 Jan 27, 2003 (UTC)
This page is definitely worth keeping if someone could add why the, "supposed 'gas sculpture' at the Universe Zone at the American Museum of Natural History," "is not truly a gas sculpture."-Hyacinth
Why is Peter Willberger being trashed like this?   Is he just a liar?   It doesn't sound that hard to make a gas sculpture, just shoot some air through some liquid.   I've done it with a straw and a coke thousands of times. --Anon
: I removed that statement. Google test did not turn up much on that guy. --Menchi 00:15, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Yellow Sea

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Yellow sae. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  — (they/them)｜Talk｜Contributions 23:22, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Yellow sae" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Equinox

message: name the line  of latitude where equinox is experienced 102.222.234.44 (talk) 12:57, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: All of them.  If you mean where the Sun is overhead, it would be the equator.  --Lasunncty (talk) 02:21, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sst 

message: According to this (https://www.imcce.fr/newsletter/docs/Equinoxe_printemps_1583_2999.pdf) article, the 2024 March (northern hemisphere spring) equinox happens at 20/03/2024 3:06 UT, but according to another page, (http://www.astropixels.com/ephemeris/soleq2001.html), the spring equinox begins at 3:07 UT, note that both articles are sited as sources for the equinox table in WP's article. So I wanted to know which source is correct on this. Thank you! :) Woomerrrr (talk) 15:29, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The US Naval Observatory site agrees with www.imcce.fr the time is 03:06 UT. Jc3s5h (talk) 17:15, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the spring equinox at 3:07 UT or 3:06 UT?
Talk:Culture hero

message: We should format the list to look like the one in trickster...
----
I'm a big fan of Jesus and all, but does he really count as a culture hero?  I think that's stretching the category a bit.  Bacchiad 10:31, 17 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with you. According to the definition given in the article, I would not count him as a cultural hero. --zeno 16:39, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Could anyone update the article with information regarding prominent theorists on this topic? It seems prima facie to be a useful notion, but, alas, rather difficult to use, owing to the very sparse description in this article.
I agree. Some citations on this topic are needed. 98.235.81.240 (talk) 06:10, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  First usage/important writers on the topic 

message: The article lists Ilmarinen as being THE culture hero of the Finns. I don't know about the real cultural impact and popularity of Kalevala characters, but from reading Lonnrot's compilation, I have to conclude that much greater importance is accorded to Väinamoinen or Lemminkäinen... so why is Ilmarinen noted ther, and neither of the other two? --Svartalf 12:21, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Finnish Hero

message: This looks more like a list than an article. Shouldn't it be called "List of Culture Heroes"? Tea and crumpets (t c) 15:41, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The best thing to do would be to move the list to a separate article called "list of culture heroes", while keeping the introduction in this article, and perhaps add a few more sections of text. 83.250.226.209 (talk) 14:55, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  List 

message: Are you kidding me? Christopher Columbus!! Wow!66.71.21.22 (talk)
~~  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.71.21.22 (talk) 09:27, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: wtf

message: "Culture hero" is by no means a universal or self-evident category, and my guess is it traces back to some particular writer like Robert Graves or Carl Jung.
Is it really saying anything different from "legendary hero" or "mythic hero"? 
In general the mythology articles on Wikipedia would do better to stay away from sophistic explanations of myths, which come and go with the regularity of the seasons, and focus more on simply summarizing the myths and their variants using primary sources.
Or if you really want to include someones speculation about a myth or myths in general identify it as such.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.6.146.126 (talk) 21:50, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  This concept should be attributed to whoever came up with it.
Talk:Thrash metal

message: subsquently = subsequently 2603:8000:D300:3650:AD45:E6EE:7A8:8B7C (talk) 08:44, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Charliehdb (talk) 10:44, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 28 May 2024
Talk:Jamie Lynn Spears

message: I believe the part about the controversies shouldn't be in the introduction. It should probably be moved in a new section and be replaced with other general information about her. What do you think? Icehax (talk) 07:56, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weird introduction. 

message: Season 4 of Zoey 101 was still being filmed into September of 2007 as reported by FOX news according to Nickelodeon in December 2007. 2601:601:CB7E:940:4D65:90DE:9D64:A194 (talk) 04:28, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  September 2007 Filming wrapped
Talk:Gilda Radner

message: no mention of their relationship?  its in a book DUH !  174.24.17.87 (talk) 08:54, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Martin Short 

message: I apologize for the error in Gilda's childhood weight.  Yesterday I put 193 instead of the 93 that she provides on page 97 of her book.  I'm changing it now.  Also, I made the footnote for the passage on page 97 separate from the multiple "A B C D ..." footnotes for the same book.  I made it separate because it includes a page number, but the "A B C D ..." footnotes don't have page numbers.  Today I'm adding to the article another passage from the book, this one from pages 100-101.  This one, too, gets a separate footnote so people can see the page numbers.  The purpose of it is to correct the error that the article has about Bill Murray.  It says few details about Radner's relationship with him were made public when it broke up in the late 1970s.  It adds that Radner wrote about the relationship in her 1989 book.  Not true.  She only mentioned Murray in passing.SantaMonicaLibraryJana (talk) 22:56, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This doesn't sound right:
:Even with Wilder's support, she suffered extreme physical and emotional pain during chemotherapy and radiotherapy treatment.
Of course she suffered even though he provided support. Perhaps there is a better way to phrase it. Buzzbo (talk) 05:08, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Illness Rewording

message: I have retitled this section, but I am less than happy with it.  I feel the entire article could benefit from being restructured on a different outline, but I am not up to it  and have no time at the moment to attempt it.  This section barely mentions college, and her eating disorder was kind of a subplot throughout her life, as such symptoms often are.  Bulimia nervosa, and suchlike, are symptoms, not diseases in themselves.  They seem to be rampant among our young people, and in particular the creative, and entertainers, though this does not seem to be a problem of Gene Wilder's.
Back to subsections.  Revert if you will, but an improvement would be preferable.  Be bold!  I am just running a little short of boldness, myself, at the moment.  Rags (talk) 12:48, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "College and eating disorder"
Talk:Supergroup (music)

message: Chris Welch claims to have invented the term 'supergroup' (as well as 'progressive rock') here at 40'50s Acorrector (talk) 20:32, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chris Welch  - invention of the term 

message: The very definition of a 'supergroup' hinges on the term 'successful'. This is a subjective term though metrics such as career earnings, records sold, songs written and longevity can all be used to establish the success of a musical band and its individual members.
Though there are dictionary definitions of the term supergroup - there is a key word and that is SUCCESS - this can obviously be defined - by numerous metrics - if a band ticks all of the boxes and is but the degree of success by these metrics - is questionable - they cannot be a super band by any part of this definition.
I know we live in a world of self promotion - and this is not a terrible thing - the problem for a platform and community life WP is its use in self-promotion and there are many policies to prevent this.
There should be a bit of common sense here also - a supergroup really is not a complicated idea - and if the members are not 'hugely successful' - chose the metrics - they cannot be a superband - especially if they a self-declaring - or there fans are doing this. BeingObjective (talk) 05:00, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism of the expression[[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Supergroup_(music)&action=edit&section=2 edit]]
Talk:Ellen McIlwaine

message: Can someone make this more NPOV:
:Throughout her recording career especially in the early days, McIlwaine would be plagued by limitations of heavyhanded and shortsighted producers, an exception occuring with the "The Real Ellen McIlwaine" album project produced in Montréal in 1975 -- Zoe
::I could flesh that out with detail but it would be based on my own conversations with her and recorded broadcast interviews. I'm not sure what standards Wiki would need for that but I've known the subject for over 40 years. One that particularly stands out was that her producer in the Polydor years turned off the bass amp she usually played with, complaining that it "isn't ladylike". Direct quote. Can I just write that in and cite myself? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.160.130.28 (talk) 00:22, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: replied in part at the IP talk page - best to get handle on the fact that there are standards that related to WP:COI and WP:RS... JarrahTree 00:34, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Re: this edit: I have no idea of the facts of the matter, but "correct Regent Theatre reference" is a pretty misleading edit summary for a non-trivial removal. - Jmabel | Talk 00:59, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regent Theatre
Talk:Magic: The Gathering

message: Hi, i recently made an image that describes the amount of common, uncommon, rare and mythic rare cards contained in Magic expansions. The italian section of Wikipedia has s rarity section that talks about these different rarities and the foil cards.
I'll leave the image here in case it can be useful to someone that wants to add that section here too.
 Icovsworld (talk) 21:52, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems the data are incorrect. For instance since Shards of Alara set there are no rare cards, but you can see in this article that this is not the case; there are other major errors in the image though. --Phyrexian ɸ 05:45, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It was probably due some incorrect filtering i've done on the dataset, i didn't know about this other article with all the correct data, i'll use it and redo all the numbers correctly, thanks! Icovsworld (talk) 09:56, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

text: it should be fine now! 93.41.120.168 (talk) 13:08, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

text: Without information on how this chart is being constructed and what the data sources is, it fails WP:V and WP:RS for use on Enwiki. -- ferret (talk) 13:59, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rarity Section. 

message: For those familiar with the game, collecting and playing or both, the game contains cards of vampires and angels. I’d like to see this game added to Category:Vampires in games and Category:Angels in popular culture Twillisjr (talk) 17:01, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Categories should be defining, per WP:CATDEF: . Can you demonstrate that sources regularly refer to the fact that M:TG contains vampires and angels? M:TG contains nearly every fantasy (and many scifi) tropes that exist. We could put a million categories for dragons, vampires, elves, dwarves, orcs, angels, gods, demons, goblins, on and on. They are not defining. -- ferret (talk) 17:04, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categories 

message: In the article, both versions are used. We should standardize, and use just one version. I had never seen "life total" spelled with a hyphen before reading this article, so my initial impulse would be to use the version without the hyphen. Thoughts? Wafflewombat (talk) 01:13, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Life-total, or life total?
Wikipedia talk:Meta/Archive 1

message: I think a sixth point should be added to the list: Meta is a place for organising and performning translations of all kinds of non-article content: from pages on foundationwiki, material for fundraiser,and material for election of community representatives to the WMF board of trustees, to pywikipedia bot editing summaries. // habj 18:56, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translations 

message: The article is a stub because it needs to expand.--96.247.51.182 (talk) 17:40, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This isn't an article. It is a project page, hence the "Wikipedia:" at the start of its name. As it is not an article, it cannot be considered a stub. It might need to be expanded, though. - Josh (talk | contribs) 19:02, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

text: If it's too short, then why do you want to split it? - Josh (talk | contribs) 19:08, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is split 

message: Out of curiosity when did the Meta-Wiki Logo change? -Vcelloho (talk) 04:26, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo 

message: I've reversed the recent page move to Wikipedia Meta Wiki, since it wasn't discussed, and since it was not correct in my opinion. This isn't an encyclopedia article, rather, it's a resource for editors; plus we already have an article at Wikimedia Foundation that covers all the aspects of Meta that are independently notable. I am open to discussion about this if anyone thinks otherwise, but please don't move it again without discussion. — Gavia immer (talk) 18:20, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent page move 

message: What about a soft redirect to meta's main page? fahadsadah (talk,contribs) 12:33, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect
Talk:Bernardino Ochino

message: Correction of "vet" to "vel": I had the same thought, but a Google search seemed to indicate that "et" is ok (and makes some sense, right?).
S.
I have a problem with this statement: "[his conversion] illustrated the justice of Luther's description of justification by faith alone as the articulus stantis vel cadentis ecclesiae, the vital point whose acceptance or rejection drew everything else along with it."  I know that the text comes from 1880, but this kind of bias is not proper in an open, nonpartisan encyclopedia.  To claim that Luther's position is just is to accept his point of view as superior.
Itahist 17:03, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes

message: How could Ochino be seen as a 'permanent Calvinist' when his work, according to THIS Wikipedia article, began to undermine Calvin's five points (TULIP, etc.)?
In 1553 the accession of Mary I drove Ochino from England. He went to Basel, where Lelio Sozzini and the lawyer Martino Muralto were sent to secure Ochino as pastor of the Italian church at Zürich, which Ochino accepted. The Italian congregation there was composed mainly of refugees from Locarno. There for 10 years Ochino wrote books which gave increasing evidence of his alienation from the orthodoxyaround him. The most important of these was the Labyrinth, a discussion of the freedom of the will, covertly undermining the Calvinistic doctrine of predestination.
In 1563 a long simmering storm burst on Ochino with the publication of his Thirty Dialogues, in one of which his adversaries maintained that he had justified polygamy under the disguise of a pretended refutation. His dialogues on divorce and against the Trinity were also considered heretical.
To me it seems reasonable to include Ochino in the Calvinism project but not to CALL him a Calvinist thinker, since he left the fold.
MaynardClark (talk) 02:14, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Calvinism?  Seriously?
Talk:Halloween 2002 anti-war protest

message: please add more from http://uk.indymedia.org/
===Neutrality===
This article needs to be cleaned up somewhat to conform to NPOV. Especially the second paragraph under "United Kingdom".
DanMS 00:37, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I have currently worded it to say that there is dispute over who organised the demo's, to my mind it was mainly the StWC but I don't have any definative proff. I was in Sheff' Uni at the time, we occupied the enginering department an action that was lead by our student StWC group, though anarcists from town joined later in the night bringing a sound system for a bit of a party.--JK the unwise 11:18, 29 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Indymedia

message: This article needs to be cleaned up somewhat to conform to NPOV. Especially the second paragraph under "United Kingdom".
DanMS 00:37, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I have currently worded it to say that there is dispute over who organised the demo's, to my mind it was mainly the StWC but I don't have any definative proff. I was in Sheff' Uni at the time, we occupied the enginering department an action that was lead by our student StWC group, though anarcists from town joined later in the night bringing a sound system for a bit of a party.--JK the unwise 11:18, 29 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality
Talk:Bristol Beaufort

message: The bomb load under the 'specifications' section isn't very clear, in terms of what the actual payload combinations were. Are the references to "1,000lb bombs" meant to signify a total maximum weight, made up of various different weights of individual armaments, or a single weapon only?
I ask because i think the article could be improved in this respect and, frankly, I don't own a substantial library of aeroplane books and Wikipedia is a universal resource for quick reference, compiled by acknowledged experts in their fields. 2A00:23C7:3119:AD01:C55E:DADC:EA24:A15D (talk) 18:18, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bombload