lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Quest for the historical Jesus

message: This construction implies that Houston was the author, when he has been established as the translator. I am guessing that "(who stated in a confession that he was the author)" or ("claimed authorship in a confession") would better reflect the facts. Since I don't know the facts, I am referring this question to someone here who might know them. Thank you. Michael (talk) 14:47, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "(who confessed himself to be the author)"? 1.1.1 paragraph 4

message: Of course, Jewish and Christian authors did write about Jesus in the 1st century. That's how we have much of the New Testament and apocryphal books about Jesus. Ehrman meant that no 1st century AD Greek or Roman author wrote about Jesus, with the exception of Jews and Christians. Tgeorgescu (talk) 13:20, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pagan
Talk:Lusus

message: "In the Lusiads (Os Lusíadas) of Luís de Camões  (printed 1572), the literary work that was created to form a national epic for Portugal, Lusus  was progenitor of his tribe (the "Lusiads") and founder of Lusitania, the Roman province that roughly corresponded to modern Portugal. Among its Iberian and Celtic tribal inhabitants, there were no historical  "Lusii" to have a tribal eponym, "Lusus". Instead, the province took its Latin name from the warbands of the Lusitani who banded together, drawn from several tribes, to counter the Roman domination, until their leader  Viriatus, was killed in 139 BCE."
*I think Lusitani and Lusus are way to similar. The Lusitanians and the Lusoni were two particular tribes. The name Lusitanian to several tribes was done by the Romans. Because these tribes joined the Lusitanians (the most numerous) and the most brave. Nether Jupiter or Atena existed has people, like Lusus dindt. -Pedro 15:14, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: X

message: "These interpretations would strongly be propagated by the authoritarian right-wing regime of the Estado Novo during the 20th century."
Where´s the source for that? RJosePereira (talk) 15:57, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to right-wing government
Talk:Rana

message: A Jedi? The word 'Rana' is not (yet) in that article. (B kimmel) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.166.9.7 (talk • contribs) 15:39, 29 March 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah it is, third paragraph down. "...and Rána, or The Wayward, a name given to the Moon by the Noldor." --Keolah 06:34, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops, my bad - and apology. 152.91.9.115 23:50, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Rana' in article
Talk:Popes (gang)

message: Particularly IP 73.193.167.13 needs to be blocked for his repeated edits that are obviously made based on a bias of some kind, not for the sake of improving the page, that has to be continuously fixed. This is likely a gang member. Wikipedia admin please take notice.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Soco79 (talk • contribs) 02:14, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Personal Interest edits by gang members

message: Repeated use of substandard grammar, information that is irrelevant to a basic understanding of the gang, an incoherent progression of the presentation of information in the article, no sources.  Illini407 (talk) 09:23, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Grammar seems better. RJFJR (talk) 13:38, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup
Talk:Ly the Fairy

message: For a March 2005 deletion debate over this page see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Ly the Fairy
(unsigned comment by SimonP, 17:43, 29 March 2005)
: This debate was closed 6 months ago, the result being "merge". I've been bold en made the article a redirect today. The relevant info that was on this page, has moved to Rayman series. --JoanneB 21:24, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
Talk:List of ships of the Polish Navy

message: On Polish contribution to World War II there is  OF Huragan (Hurricane) - any data on this one? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 15:58, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: First Miecznik class ship (Arrowhead 140) is to be finished in 2028. Many things can happen until then, as Gawron program showed already in past two decades. Also, if we include 3 Miecznik ships in this article, 3 additional Kormoran class ships should be included too, as they are already contracted. In conclusion, Miecznik class should be removed until construction on first start in shipyard. 2A02:A312:C942:9680:44D2:C800:F0BD:AFF1 (talk) 07:56, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Miecznik shouldn't be included yet 

message: First problem:
So in recent years several ships were withdrawn from Polish service- for example all of Kobben class submarines. 
So were are they on this list? 
Answer is- nowhere. Cause dividing this article into pre WW 2, WW 2, cold war and currently in service sections is not working! Other similiar lists simply name for example all of submarines in one section only! Not in 4 (and to be fair it should be 5 if kobbens were to be added- in a new post cold war section)This article is named "List of ships of the Polish Navy" not "List of Polish ships by conflict" or something like that
Second thing:
This article in WW2/preWW2 sections lists destroyers, cruisers, minesweepers and so on. But cold war and modern sections also include thing like training ships, survey ships and other auxiliary vessels. Does it mean Poland did not any of such ships before war? Of course they did! But I guess they were not deemed important enough to be listed. And to be fair all of  cold war and modern ones that are listed are "big boys". Small ships and boats were also omitted. 
Third thing:
"Currently in service" section is copy-pasted from different article - that much is obvious. It ends with astonishing information:
"Over 40 other ships and yachts including museum ship ORP Błyskawica (H34). "  - that is just so lazy. You are creating a list of ships, and instead of naming them you write "yeah there is 40 more of them but you know who gives a damn right?"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by KalrinEU (talk • contribs) 14:37, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is badly written and kinda useless
Talk:Lord Ochiltree

message: According to my sources, Andrew Richard Charles Stuart, Viscount Stuart has only one child, a daughter. --VM 16:10, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: That is informative, sir. --Anglius 19:55, 7 October 2005 (UTC)

text: Gentlemen, a lordship of Parliament cannot be sold but could be surrendered to the Crowwn or resigned. In addition, how can there be more than one Earl of Arran (in the Scottish peerage) simultaneously? --Anglius 19:55, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Zia Mohyeddin

message: This article has been rewritten and edited once again; moreover I’m giving the copyright to Wikipedia and now let this article be an asset of human kind on the web. You can edit it further. Thanks.
FactFinder
 Karachi Bharwaas
What i don't understand is what do karachi bharwas or the urdu speaking idiots find so attractive in PIA.The muhajir community is a majority lowerclass community and hence seeks low white collar jobs.Thus most of them are also secular minded.That's the reason their women also do jobs and wear shameless dress called sari.
::What are you babbling about? 2.28.151.170 (talk) 16:02, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewritten & Re-edited
Talk:Barbican, Plymouth

message: This article could do with some images of The Barbican, and information of the restaurants, shops, etc in that area. --Benbread 16:58, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled

message: I've given the article a quick polish. Not perfect, but a decent base for further work I hope. Can anyone add citations for some of the many unreferenced facts remaining - I particularly marked a few wanting dates, e.g. in which year was the harbour fitted with lock gates, in which year did the fish market move, and in which year did the Sutton Pool developments start?  —SMALLJIM  14:52, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite
Talk:Telephone numbers in France

message: I think a Paris number would be +33 1 etc, not +33 01 etc, could someone include this and possible variations in the article? --GaborPete (talk) 01:13, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Calling French numbers from abroad

message: the "country code" for france is "33" - 
However, what are the "area codes" called - for example "02" for Paris? is it called "Provincial code"?
I think that information should be added as well - if anyone knows it.
:Well... I suppose it could be called "code régional", but since it corresponds to no administrative or historical entity, there isn't really any accurate name that can be used. And since the whole number always has to be dialed (02 is for the west, by the way, 01 is for Paris) there is no real need to have a word for just a part of it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.57.168.140 (talk) 21:00, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Area codes

message: When did the international access code change from 19 to 00? At the same time as one of the other changes mentioned, I assume, but it needs to be clarified which. Was it ever anything else before it was 19? Beorhtwulf (talk) 17:44, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  International access code
Template talk:KwaZulu-Natal Province

message: I've filled in a list of District Municipalities (10 in all), and removed the "municipalities" section. Local municipalities can be added, but I would suggest that, if that is to be done, all 50 be listed at once. A complete listing is here.
've also moved Ladysmith from the "major metros" list: Officially, Ethekwini is the only metropolitan municipality in KZN, and I'm not sure that a population of 30k qualifies Ladysmith for "major metro" status.  --168.209.97.34 18:05, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Eva Jessye

message: she is a very talented woman. she is an actor, director etc.
does anyone know anything about her family?
there is nothing anywhere talking about her family?
can someone help me with this? pleaseee!!
my name is Krystal and i still need help.
thats me writing this over and over
she was very vain and opisite from everyone else in  the place were she belong so she did not caret all  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.107.122.187 (talk) 21:30, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Drownproofing

message: I have noticed that there are images on the web which are described as drownproofing, but which depict something entirely different, The latest and most obvious example is Hooyahpart1 on Youtube.
In this video, men can be seen, going from the bottom of a swimming pool to the surface, with hands and feet apparently tied. They are not using their natural buoyancy, but kicking off the bottom of the pool in order to propel themselves to the surface. These are claimed to be trainee (US) Navy Seals. If this is the case, it would be interesting to know how it came about that the Navy is no longer teaching the Fred Lanoue survival technique, but has replaced it with something which would be of little use in a real-life emergency situation. 
Does anyone have any information about this? Will the Navy make a statement, please?
With regard to the requirement for a photograph, I would be perfectly happy for the picture in drownproofing.com to be used. Gary, who took the picture, gave it to me without charge, to be used on the site. I added the acknowledgment as a coeurtesy. I found the Fair use rules a bit hard to follow and couldn't make out if I was entitled to make this picture available. Can someone advise me, please? Mikehimself 18:55, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It'd be easiest if you could get him to agree to license it under the Creative Commons 2.5 license. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 20:39, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Navy Way 
Talk:Nalchik

message: Could someone please translate the russian or the dutch translation into english?
They have more information and I would like to read it. — Preceding undated comment added 18:43, 29 March 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Enjoy.—Ëzhiki (erinaceus europeaus) 20:43, Mar 29, 2005 (UTC)
şehrinizi çok begendik çok temiz ve güzel  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.235.204.142 (talk) 21:22, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: — Assignment last updated by Miami2024 (talk) 22:10, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: EDT 251 - Research Skills and Strategies
Talk:Ngee Ann Secondary School

message: 1953, the Kongsi assumed management of Tuan Mong High School, renaming it as Ngee Ann Secondary School.I amended the above sentence as it is incorrect. It was actually named Tuan Mong School, and then renamed Tuan Mong High School 2 years after Ngee Ann Kongsi assumed management of the school in 1953. source --A10203040 21:19, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tuan Mong High School 
Talk:FLETC

message: Article for the most part appears to use as its source the "About us" page on the FLETC web site: (http://www.fletc.gov/pao/about_fletc.htm). 
This comment is not a criticism but merely to provide source info.
The web site has good info on the Center, more of which could be incorporated into the article.WCFrancis 13:24, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Back, Lewis

message: Nowadays this leads onto a cycle path which indeed reaches Ness.I heard that is only a footpath and uncycleable.  Has it ben upgraded recently?--JBellis 19:42, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Anne Conway (philosopher)

message: Shouldn't her name rather be Anne, Lady Conway? / Uppland 19:48, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: :(The question above was written when the article was at Lady Anne Finch Conway. Uppland 06:49, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: According to this:
http://www.earlymoderntexts.com/f_conway.html
the pic is not of her.  Since it is commonly represented to be her, I'm not sure whether it would be better to add a note or just remove it (obviously, if we do the latter, it will get repeatedly re-added...) Calum (talk) 19:08, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pic 

message: I see that the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography article on Anne Conway has been opened up as part of their celebration of women philosophers. I don't see an indication of how long this is intended to last. MartinPoulter (talk) 13:48, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  ODNB article has been opened up 

message: — Assignment last updated by Pond00025 (talk) 19:25, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: History of Science to Newton

message: — Assignment last updated by Eaturvegeez (talk) 21:24, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Technical and Professional Writing

message: Hello!
Over the next few weeks, I plan to make edits regarding the structure and grammar of this article. I will be working on these edits in my sandbox, but will eventually transfer them over to this page. I will not be adding any content, or changing the overall information contained in the article.  P1clouds (talk) 18:08, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction for Edits
Talk:History of chemistry

message: Tapputi has her own page that states she is the first recorded chemist but she is nowhere to be found in this article. Denisrodman88 (talk) 15:23, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: You're correct that Tapputi, an ancient Mesopotamian perfumer, is considered one of the earliest known individuals who worked with chemicals. Her methods and techniques date back to around the second millennium BCE. It is indeed important to acknowledge her contributions when discussing the history of chemistry. Including Tapputi and the ancient Egyptian perfume-making techniques in the discussion would provide a broader perspective on the early advancements in chemical practices. It's always valuable to highlight diverse contributions to the field of chemistry to ensure a comprehensive understanding of its historical development. Luban the truth (talk) 10:34, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should Tapputi be added 

message: Quite a bit has happened in the past 20-30 years and the article seems to not reflect that. Is there a particular reason for this (f.e. Wikipedia guidelines I have failed to find)? 
If not, I would be interested in collaborating with some fellow chemists on expanding the later parts of the article.  --Balonlon (talk) 13:03, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Offer still open Balonlon (talk) 09:10, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

text: If there is anything you feel this article is lacking, please let me know so I can check into it. Luban the truth (talk) 10:37, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is there a reason for the lack of 21st century accounts and a limited late 20th century?  

message: — Assignment last updated by Omgmylife (talk) 13:07, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: SSC199 TY4
Talk:Eagle Palms

message: by any chance, do you have a pic of the medal with the 3 palm pins on it?  it think that would add greatly as well. Cavebear42 20:13, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: No idea, but I have seen a photo of just one palm on the medal.  I also seen photos of the palms on the Eagle Scout youth patch and adult sqaure knot. Zscout370 20:51, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: im pretty sure that its only proper on the medal.  i have no palms so i cant take the pic myself, but it would be a good pic. Cavebear42 17:34, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I did not even earn the palms when I got Eagle Scout, so I guess we have to look online.  A Google Search will be good. Zscout370 17:35, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)

text: Found it in Insignia Guide.  You wear them on the knot and ribbon.  No place else.  Not on the patch.  --Emb021 19:06, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: palm pictures

message: I deleted the line about the BOR being after the 18th birthday.  The Advancement Guide (I just looked to make sure) only says the Eagle BOR can be after he's 18.Rlevse 22:38, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Board of Review

message: Copied from Talk:Eagle Scout (Boy Scouts of America):
Previously on Wikipedia.  Back in March of 2006, we had a consensus to merge the Cub Scouting and the Boy Scouting advancement articles as I have proposed below.  These merges were made and the links and redirects fixed.  In June 2006, User:Cool Cat unilaterally reverted all of these changes.  There was a lot of discussion and acrimony, and we left it as it was.
It is now almost a year since the original merges and the articles in question have stood as stubs since then, with only a few minor edits.  I now propose to reinstate those merges.  These merges are effectively already done, as the information was moved back in March.
Merge Eagle Palms into Eagle Scout
As noted, this merge has effectively already been performed- this is a pro forma notice.
--Gadget850 ( Ed) 13:55, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Intergang

message: Apparently, someone is going around planning to have a merging of some of Intergang's leaders like someone had committed with Moxie "Boss" Mannheim. Now someone is planning on doing the same thing to Bruno Mannheim and Morgan Edge (whose father Vincent Edge doesn't have a full history on this website). As the two of them have had some media appearances outside of the comics, I am against this merge. If any of you would like to take sides on this, please do it here? --Rtkat3 (talk) 02:24, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging of Intergang members

message: Lois Lane as Author X is investigating them. Bruno Mannheim is leading it this time around. Superman: Lois and Clark. JAF1970 (talk) 17:33, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: New 52
Talk:Interactive urinal communicator

message: "Some plain screens have carried advertising for a few years now." (final sentence)
--> Am I too stupid to understand what that means or refers to? <KF> 20:49, Mar 29, 2005 (UTC)
The drain cover in a urinal has an advertisement on it......
I don't know about everybody else's locales, but in Northern Ireland I forsee this leading to lots of smashed such devices... GreyKnight 17:55, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Left-wing extremism

message: This article seems rather confused about many things. It is not, for example, obvious that anarchists are left-wing. It neglects to consider that different societies label 'extremism' in diffeent ways - in the US a genuine Marxist would be considered a left-wing extremist. Someone who advocated abolition of private property would be in most places, even if they advocated this non-violently. DJ Clayworth 21:03, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)

message: Why not just put it into the Left-wing article and revise it?
Duncan Smith 14:59, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorporate it into Left-wing article perhaps? 

message: I've clarified what would need to be added for this to be an objective category--maybe that will help. I have some reservations about saying that communism and Marxism are "between" anarchism and socialism, and even about treating communism and Marxism as disjoint categories, but I'm not sure how to fix that--someone else can do it. DanielCristofani 11:40, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notes. 

message: This page was voted on for deletion at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Left-wing extremism. The final result was Keep. --Deathphoenix 18:01, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  VfD done: Keep
Talk:1920 in architecture

message: I have a few issues with this article. The first, and most obvious, is the lack of sources. The second issue, which affects the first, is that all of the information given appears biased. How did the writer of this article decide which people and events were "significant?" Unless there were major architectural innovations in 1920 that have not yet been addressed on Wikipedia, I'm not entirely sure this page needs to exist. Fred.Pendleton (talk) 05:38, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources and Subject Matter
Talk:Y combinator

message: Y Combinator is also the name of Paul Graham's new venture firm: .  However, I'm not sure the best way to handle setting up a disambiguation page since "Y combinator" redirects to another page and the companies name is actually "Y Combinator". 192.160.6.252 21:18, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)