Talk:Earth (Brin novel)

message: from VfD:
Delete this paragraph of nonsense. AlainV 03:53, 2004 May 20 (UTC)
*Delete. Reads like someone's sandbox noodlings. Alcarillo 05:10, 20 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Recap of a failed [[WP:VfD|VfD]]

message: I have read the book, and a few things jump out at me.  First off, the book does (partially) revolve around an object that is thought to be a micro black hole, probably a relic of the Tunguska explosion, but that object is later found to be a more exotic object of artificial origin.  The summary also implies that the object is human-made, yet this is not the ultimate conclusion drawn by the characters in the book.
David Brin deserves credit for many prescient predictions, but the internet and the World Wide Web are not among them.  This novel was published in 1990, which is a time when Tim Berners Lee was already working on and finalizing the first web browsing software — see the history of the World Wide Web.  Brin might have a valid claim with blogging.
Far more troublesome for the section titled Predictions is that it is entirely without citations.  The section begins with a statement that David Brin wrote the book specifically to speculate about what future technologies might be taken for granted day-to-day.  While David Brin may have written this book with that goal in mind, there is no citation for this.  (Such a statement might be found in the Foreword of some edition of the book, but it needs to be properly cited.)  Later in the section, a list of purported predictions is preceded by: "Brin claims at least 15 predictive hits in Earth including [...]"  Besides the omission of the comma before "including", we again have no citation to back this up.  The edition of the book I read clearly doesn't include a list of predictions, since I read the book a scant year or two after first publication.  I'm sure Brin made some claims, but they were published either in a subsequent edition or in another publication altogether.  Without the citation, we might as well be putting words in Brin's mouth. 204.17.31.126 (talk) 22:26, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccurate and misleading summary, lacking citations elsewhere 

message: Why was a spoiler warning added? There's no plot outcomes revealed in the article. MK2 06:03, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spoiler warning 

message: That list of "predictions" could probably be cleaned up - If one didn't know better, it makes it sound like Brin was the first person ever to predict the Internet (c'mon, we all know Al Gore invented it way before this book was written!) - but seriously, pretty much anything by William Gibson has him beat (and he may not have been the first, either). Also - Global warming sea rise?!? Give me a break, it was an established scientific theory for years before this novel was written! And what the heck is a "lawyer program"? -- Antepenultimate 22:02, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Pity that this would be OR, but from my reading, no one predicted it as accurately as he did: Hypertext, multi-media, news feeds, email spam. Back in 1990, all we basically had was text; there was no MIME format, no HTML, and first hint of SPAM probably came with AOL in '92.  Gibson, to wit, has stated (so I heard) that he never used a computer until long after he wrote Neuromancer. And from a technological standpoint, the only thing Gibson had right was a vague notion of internet security meta-techniques (ie, firewalls, though he imagined them much more iconically than we do today). I used to read quite a lot of 'classic' sci-fi, and Brin, despite the fact that he is not considered a cyberphunk author, and that most of the rest of his novels suck, was the most accurate so far. (But it would be nice if Neal Stephenson's the Diamond Age ever comes close to reality.) --Otheus 15:52, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of predictions 

message: :Image:Earth(1stEd).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 05:35, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Earth(1stEd).jpg

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Earth (Brin novel). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060323053138/http://www.davidbrin.com/othersfbooks.html to http://www.davidbrin.com/othersfbooks.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:13, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified