lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Template talk:Help me-nq

message: This template is for use in reply to the  template, when the tag has been used but a question has not been asked. Please remember to substitute it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tangotango (talk • contribs) 16:38, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is the requirement for substitution really necessary? It introduces a lot of markup in the pages, and I do not see why it couldn't be included without substitution… Calimo (talk) 10:08, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps the main reason to continue the substitution-only requirement is that like other templates that are unprotected and may be used by any contributor, with frequently high usage on IP editor talk pages, no damage can be done by vandal edits to the template.  If transcluded, and this template may be used often and quickly become a high-risk template, vandal edits may eventually have a damaging effect on WP servers. Paine  03:30, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: If that is the case, then the language of -nq needs to be changed, since it currently says to replace  with , something which is not easily done when substituted. Of course, protecting the page would work just as well. Primefac (talk) 14:22, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that erasing the substituted -nq and then replacing the  template may be cumbersome, but not really beyond the capability of most people who use computers, and the guidance in the template is just to "replace the  tag", which to me means to open another  after the initial discussion with no need to erase anything.  To protect -nq even with just semi-protection would defeat some of its purpose, don't you think? Paine  22:02, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: , out of curiosity, why would protecting a template that is often-used and not-often edited defeat the purpose? Primefac (talk) 02:11, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: "Some of its purpose" would be defeated if we look beyond its obvious purpose and see that this template is often used on IP talk pages of editors who know little about how to edit Wikipedia.  This template is often all they get as a "welcome".  It might be one of their first opportunities to edit.  If transcluded and protected, and they want to change something in the template, they cannot even if their edit would have been an improvement.  These templates don't require protection precisely because they are substituted.  So the best reason not to transclude them is that if repeatedly vandalized in an edit war, they are easily fixed without introducing a large delay for all the other background updates, which editors sometimes find annoying.  If others want to try transcluding rather than subbing, then let them chime in.  If the consensus is to transclude these templates, then so shall it be. Paine  10:45, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Substitution
Talk:Misilmeri

message: This is a place with a population of 24,950, yet its most notable resident is claimed to be someone who appears in an American TV commercial. Isn’t there a doctor in the town? or a teacher? or a road-sweeper? or a carabiniere?  or a nurse? or anyone useful? I am sure she is a nice lady, but I am going to remove her. Sorry!—Ian Spackman 16:57, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable insanity! 
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Gurch

message: Since some user has decided to alert me of the fact I might have caused offence with the "Nazi moon base" joke I posted, allow me to apologise here, in brief; the intent, of course, was a light attempt at satire given the number of questions posed to those requesting a few additional tools as of late; there are fewer question marks in an episode of Who Wants To Be A Millionaire? than one of our precious little process pages.
To cease deviating from the point, then; no intention to offend existed, and I apologise to those who might have been. robchurch | talk 16:41, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nazi mysticism is more interesting anyway.--Sean Black 02:58, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nazi moon base
Talk:Lava fountain

message: This article could really use a picture... Dirk Gently 16:42, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: ...and now it's got one.  Worldtraveller 17:59, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hey, thanks! Dirk Gently 20:31, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem at all!  Now to make the article at least as long as the image is... :)  Worldtraveller 00:19, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture
Talk:Spidey Super Stories

message: After reading the first few paragraphs, I'm still unsure of what the skit was, exactly. I never saw The Electric Company as a kid, as it wasn't carried (as Sesame Street was) by CBC Television, so you can't assume a typical reader will know whether it was live action or animation, unless it's specifically stated in the first paragraph, preferably in the first line. This is especially confusing:
:Unlike other live-action and cartoon productions of Spider-Man, The Electric Company's version of the web-slinging hero communicates only in word balloons because he is drawn without a mouth.
From this I could guess it was animated, since it mentions him being drawn, but it was called a skit in the intro paragraph, and the above line says "unlike other live-action," which leads me to believe it could be a live-action skit. Very confusing. Kaijan 16:43, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It was live-action, although animated panels were shown (as in between scenes). It really isn't that confusing. [[Briguy52748 17:10, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  The way it was worded was confusing nevertheless. Kaijan 02:04, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Was it live action or animation?

message: Last month, a trivia tag was placed on the page, but there was never any discussion or reasoning on the talk page as to why? I think the person who tagged the page should explain why he feels this article contains too much trivia. Thanks! [[Briguy52748 17:11, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Trivia tag

message: Messy Thinking (talk) 02:52, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Unlisted villains

message: Ill start a new section in response to the earlier post from a while back. If we ever get confused about how much detail to put in an article, here's a good benchmark: are the details you've added referenced from independent sources? in other words, is there enough interest in the subject matter to inspire a magazine article, book, documentary film, etc that goes into such detail? I'm not saying we shouldnt ever include details that are not referenced like this, as after all the episodes themselves qualify as sources for this material. there is no question that they exist and contain all this detail, as all tv shows do. The dividing line between fan sites and WP is simply: do enough people care enough to have written about it OTHER than here or a blog, etc. I would say that many of the details here are nonnotable, and really belong on a fansite. where to draw the line: I dont know yet, but it would be nice to see anyone else who takes even a momentary interest in this article think about it, write something here, and even be bold and edit it. I wont yet, i just discovered this article (its been tagged a looong time), and its not like WW3 will start if i dont trim it back. And where are the references? Mercurywoodrose (talk) 02:06, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rationale for trivia tag 

message: Can the approximate number of 390 episodes be confirmed or cited? --66.110.6.119 (talk) 16:57, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of Episodes
Talk:Purpendicular

message: *All song titles serve as redirects to this album, have their own pages, or have had disambig links placed at the appropriate article or disambiguation page.--Hraefen Talk 21:23, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: '''<^>v!!This album is connected!!v<^>'''

message: Which string instrument is played on "The aviator" (first two minutes)? Just acoustic guitar? --144.85.240.18 (talk) 17:03, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: And: bagpipes at the end?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.85.240.18 (talk) 17:05, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Instruments on "The aviator"
Talk:Personal beheading

message: much ado is being made of zarqawi personally beheading nick berg and a british man (journalist?). how do we know this, and why do we care if he did it himself? it just feels like one of those fuzzy news bits where there is serious wiggle room. he's "believed to have". it's good fodder today, but I bet we don;t hear about it tomorrow. CrackityKzz 16:45, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Showcase (Canadian TV channel)

message: Perhaps something about the "Thanks, Showcase!" advert campaign? 
Carolynparrishfan 16:45, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Thanks, Showcase!" advert campaign?  

message: Can u play lethal weapon trilogies? 2607:FA49:8446:DA00:E196:3554:5F8:4857 (talk) 22:32, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Movies
Talk:Slaves and Masters

message: *All song titles serve as redirects to this album, have their own pages, or have had disambig links placed at the appropriate article or disambiguation page.--Hraefen Talk 00:57, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: '''<^>v!!This album is connected!!v<^>'''

message: Could someone please fill in the first names for the "Greenwood" and "Held" listed for "Too Much Is Not Enough"? It's so pointless, stupid and annoying to only be able to see the last names.
--Rock Soldier 16:09, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Writing Credits

message: don't know how old this article is but King of Dreams has also been played Live during Joe Lynn Turner's 2009 High Grand Tour. Cheers  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.30.100.82 (talk) 07:21, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  King of Dreams live
Talk:Heber Jentzsch

message: The article states "Carl was arrested in 1955 and excommunicated from The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.[4]"
Citation 4 is a self reference to the same article. The wording makes it sound like the "Mormon Church" had something to do with his arrest in 1955. Also there is no citation to what the details of the arrest are. I'm going to edit this a bit to make things more clear.
Full disclosure: Heber is a relation of mine (I've never met him).
--RyanNerd (talk) 19:39, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Claim: "Jentzsch joined the Church of Scientology in 1967 after allegedly being cured by the Scientology Purification Rundown of radiation burns he had suffered since he was 15."
Problem is, the Purification Rundown did not exist in 1967. Nor did its predecessor, the Sweat Program. Per old copies of the Scn volumes I have, the Sweat Program was introduced in 1977. (Citations: HCOB 6 Feb 1978R, LSD and the Sweat Program and HCOB 31 May 1977, LSD Years After They Have "Come Off Of" LSD)
I know there were earlier radiation "handling" procedures done in Scientology, e.g.:
"It works by itself but is best taken with an old-time “Guk Bomb”. The formula of the “bomb” is variable but is basically 100 mg of Vitamin B1, 15 gr of calcium, 500 mg of Vitamin C. If you add 100 mg of old-time nicotinic acid (not niacinamide) and take it daily it becomes “Dianazene” for radiation prevention. Don’t include nicotinic acid in the formula with Vitamin E unless you are trying to get rid of radiation or radiation sickness."
(From HCOB 27 December 1965, Vitamins)
Without reading the text of the cited article, I can't be certain, but the only thing I think is in error here is the name of the procedure being used. Many Scientology procedures don't have formal names. I think in order to make it correct, this would be sufficient:
"Jentzsch joined the Church of Scientology in 1967 after allegedly being cured by Scientology of radiation burns he had suffered since he was 15."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deirdresm (talk • contribs) 00:12, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Purification Rundown did not exist in 1967
Talk:The House of Blue Light

message: *All song titles serve as redirects to this album, have their own pages, or have had disambig links placed at the appropriate article or disambiguation page.--Hraefen Talk 22:43, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: '''<^>v!!This album is connected!!v<^>'''

message: Obviously this is a funny mistake:
"United Kingdom (BPI)[9]	60× Platinum	18,000,000^"  Fp cassini (talk) 00:15, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  how many copies sold in the UK? 

message: Strangely enough, a copy of this album was issued in the U.S.S.R. by the state-owned (and only) record company Melodia. I have no idea whether they had any permission or paid any royalties. Still, perhaps the fact is worth including in the article; the details should be available in the Interwebzes.  --Ehitaja (talk) 16:45, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Soviet edition
Talk:Canal+ (French TV channel)

message: I have been trying to knock the two articles for the group and for this channel into shape, although I am still not entirely sure of the corporate structure. If anyone has a better knowledge about the "sister channels", please advise and/or add to the article. I removed some from the table that are not mentioned on the main website, and just left the Canal+ branded ones. I'm not too sure why there are two football channels shown, when I can only see one - can anyone advise, please? Laterthanyouthink (talk) 03:55, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent overhaul 

message: Since the DAB page was created, many of the incoming links were automatically converted to target this page. Unfortunately many of these should rightly target the Groupe or StudioCanal articles. I have changed quite a lot manually, but if anyone else feels like helping to attend to this administrative task over time, please have a look at the incoming links and check the articles if you think they may be incorrect. (Note that some of the incoming links relate to templates - I think these have been fixed.) Laterthanyouthink (talk) 02:06, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incoming links
Talk:Clyde Crashcup

message: "Crashcup later had a special guest spot in the modern Alvin and the Chipmunks cartoon episode "Back to Alvin's Future", in which he showed up in the time of the new show with a time machine and brought the modern Chipmunks back to his time, where they temporarily switched places with the Alvin Show Chipmunks." 
I don't remember this and I watched that show religiously. Was this one of those movie episodes like Batmunk? 64.241.230.3 16:56, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, although it borrowed much less of Back to the Future than the movie-spoof episodes usually did. 81.145.240.100 19:02, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Bagdasarian Productions and DreamWorks Animation develop to make a 3-D computer animated feature film to released on November 7, 2014, featuring Clyde Crashcup (James Marsden) and Leonardo (N/A), and directed by Barry Sonnenfeld, the director of the Men in Black movies.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.44.77.172 (talk) 17:34, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  movie 

message: A fundamental element of nearly all of the plots of Clyde's adventures was that all of his various attempts at invention fail, ludicrously, until Leonardo finally whispers the suggestion for an appropriate approach into his ear.  Thus the final success of all of his inventions is that they are, in fact, Leonardo's inventions.  The article fails to mention this central plot feature.
Oh, and "Leonardo" was conceived to make us think "Leonardo da Vinci".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.95.43.249 (talk) 00:43, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing Plot Element
Talk:Merab Mamardashvili

message: > was a Georgian philosopher
shouldn't it be "soviet and georgian" 94.154.66.240 (talk) 03:12, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  soviet or georgian 
Talk:Caroline Ouellette

message: Please take note that Caroline Ouellette finished the 2010-11 season with 68 points, not 71 (as incorrectly tabulated through pointstreak with shootout goals). The official record/total for the Angela James Bowl winner is 68 points, as noted on the trophy's official page at http://hockeymedia.ca/angelajamesbowl.html. The official player stats are also published in Who's Who in Women's Hockey book. 198.254.254.171 (talk) 23:17, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  68 points in 2010-11
Talk:Kim St-Pierre

message: She described the experience as "Priceless"? Was someone intending a pun or something?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.248.131.72 (talk) 06:53, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It could be that she intended the pun.  PKT(alk) 12:55, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:National Pro Fastpitch

message: I've adapted this text from the NPF website just to get something up on Wikipedia. Have at it!
--Jsorens 16:59, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: adapted text

message: According to the recent ESPN broadcast of the World Cup of Softball, there have been pro leagues in Japan for quite a while.
The article reads that the NPF is the only professional league in the united states, which is true. Sreyan 19:30, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Only pro league in the world? 

message: This article should be split in two, since the predecessor league, WPSL - Women's Pro Softball League, was a different league, and should be split off, with a redirect created from Women's Pro Fastpitch. 70.51.11.210 (talk) 07:42, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There's been no support for this split, and it is customary on Wikipedia to simply change the name of an article when a league or venue changes names rather than create a new article. SilkTork *YES! 20:12, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Split

message: Dsides12 pointed to this source for information on where the travelling teams, Aussie Spirits and Beijing Shougang Eagles, are "based", and asked for help with adding them to the map, if I understand his request correctly. I don't think that's a good idea. The traveling teams may be "based" in specific locations, but they have "home" games all over the map. To me it's unclear whether any games are played in those base locations. Thus adding the locations to the map wouldn't provide meaningful information about the league, in my opinion. Huon (talk) 20:41, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bases for traveling teams 

message: I didn't even realize the ScrapYard Dawgs weren't returning to the NPF for the 2018 season, they were a pretty popular team. What happened for them to leave the NPF? --Jbaldon03 (talk) 06:59, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  What exactly happened to the ScrapYard Dawgs?
Talk:Living in the 20th Century

message: {{subst:image source|Image:20thcenturyalbum.jpg)) Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 23:00, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Julie Chu

message: It is not to be included in a player's medal record.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:E35:2E96:BA90:3022:5D0F:6238:4DA (talk) 17:59, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Four Nations is NOT an official IIHF tournament

message: The link in the bio box to "national team" goes automatically to the MEN'S national hockey team, and it's some type of automatic code so I couldn't fix it. I assume the same applies for the rest of the US women's national team. Which is really annoying.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.65.252.181 (talk) 04:45, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. There is a hidden parameter for sex that redirects the automated link to the proper national team. I'll try to take a look at the rest of this years team and correct them as well. Cheers. --Mo Rock...Monstrous  (leech44) 22:13, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  National team link goes to men's team page 
Talk:Natalie Darwitz

message: Alright, I've scoured the article from most of the garbage, which read more like a promotional page from a particularly inept agent than a sports biography article of a celebrated athlete.  There's still work left to do -- for one thing, the statistics table needs to come out of that terrible format where playing on the National Team is considered to be a "league" and the "team" name reflected whatever outfit was advertising its support at any given time.   Ravenswing   18:40, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Done!  ;-)   --MikeVitale 16:23, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean up 
Talk:Pyridoxine/doxylamine

message: I have concerns with this addition to the article:
:The commonly reported 'fact' above regarding teratogenic activity excludes other known effects on fetuses and newborns found in worldwide research from many different sources in scientific communities, provided on the first external link listed below.
As written, the text makes the article appear to be in an argument with itself.  This should be rewritten or reverted.
In the same edit, a link was added to the article "How a Commonly Used Drug Caused Birth Defects" (part 2 of 2) written by one of the Bendectin plaintiffs.  I think that if we are to link to this article, we should do so in context.  Right now there is nothing to suggest that the article is not written by a disinterested individual. Michael Slone (talk) 08:15, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Biased use of language

message: I removed a section that claimed, in essence, Bendectin to be teratogen, a view that has been soundly refuted in the scientific literature. There is no scientific review of Bendectin implicating it as a teratogen. Links provided were not based on scientific articles and also did not work. Ekem (talk) 21:39, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of unfounded section

message: Citation number eighteen in the article links to a blurb and a paywall. While the full article might be credible, linking to it in this form doesn't meet standards because it doesn't include any information which could be used to verify the claim; it merely states it as fact.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moonlightfox (talk • contribs) 14:20, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improve citation for #18 

message: New evidence, more accurately suppressed existing evidence, has emerged that Diclectin is ineffective in combating nausea associated with pregnancy.
See these sources:
http://www.cbc.ca/news/health/diclectin-pregnancy-nausea-vomiting-persaud-duchesnay-confidential-industry-documents-health-canada-1.4491300
https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/drugs-health-products/drug-products/scientific-expert-advisory-panels/diclectin/record-proceedings.html
In addition the FDA released a report in 2013 which recommended approval but indicated that the "treatment effect was small" - https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2013/021876Orig1s000CrossR.pdf
I have neither the time nor the experience to update this article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.110.245.183 (talk) 01:43, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Already added the 2018 review that those popular press peices are based on on the 19th. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 02:29, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evidence disputing the efficacy of Diclectin  

message: There is no discussion of the proposed mechanism for how the addition of a b6 vitamin improves the action of doxylamine. Does pyridoxine alone have an effect against morning sickness? If not, what is it about this combination that forms a synergizing product? ThreeRocks (talk) 18:36, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mechanism
Talk:Absolutely Live (The Doors album)

message: : Hello, there have been several attempts to add details to Doors articles without any reliable sources, including this one. The beginning of the Track listing section includes: "Songwriters and LP side total lengths are taken from the original 1983 Elektra Records album (individual song timings are not listed) and may differ from other sources.[liner notes]" The timings you added are not in the cited source and do not add up to the total side lengths taken from the actual LP. Are there reliable sources for the additions for the original LP? Reissues often show different info and we should not be  changing track listing details every time there is a new release. —Ojorojo (talk) 15:30, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Track listing details