lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:HIV.gov

message: This entry is not blatant advertising, rather it is an article that intends to provide information about HIV/AIDS resources at the Federal domestic level.
Msamplin 15:26, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi.  Look, I'm sympathetic to your goals of providing information, and from a glance at the website it seems to be a good resource.  It definitely belongs as an external link in articles like AIDS and HIV.  However, it does not merit an article of its own.  The article does not assert the notability of aids.gov, and I can't find any reliable sources that will permit such an assertion.  Verbatim copying of text from one website onto Wikipedia has a strong whiff of advertising.  Please read our policies on notability, the notability of websites, and, if you are an employee of HHS's AIDS.gov project, our conflict of interest policy.  Cheers, Skinwalker 15:49, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Advertising

message: This portal provides comprehensive government-wide information on HIV/AIDS for the general public, Federal agencies, state staff/public health departments, Federal grantees, medical institutions, research institutions, and HIV/AIDS-related organizations. We are providing an opportunity for people to learn about this important resource and more importantly contribute additional federal HIV/AIDS information and resources.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jennie.e.anderson (talk • contribs) 15:43, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good luck finding independent refs - I wasn't able to locate anything through google or lexisnexis.  Google has many hits for aids.gov that are primarily intra-government links, the rest seem to be simple links that do not discuss the site in any detail.  The article's sole claim to notability is a press release by the HHS, which is not a non-governmental source.  In fact, the article fails every criterion for inclusion at WP:WEB.  I will be taking this to AFD soon if it is not significantly improved.  Cheers, Skinwalker 19:40, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Federal HIV/AIDS Resource 
Talk:Arizona Department of Corrections, Rehabilitation and Reentry

message: The article states ADC is in charge of 10 prisons, but the List of Arizona state prisons has 13 listed.  Any clarifications? --TeaDrinker (talk) 15:14, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of Prisons? 
Talk:History of the Maltese in Gibraltar

message: This article remains a stub. Gibmetal I leave it to you to improve it! Good Luck!--Burgas00 03:26, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: By the way, do you guys have any info on the use of Maltese in Gib today? Does anyone still use it? Might be worth mentioning. Also mentioning a few famous Gibraltarians of Maltese heritage...--Burgas00 20:22, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Right, we've got the ball rolling now which is good.  I havn't yet been able to find sources that verify the use of Maltese in Gibraltar but it definitely is in use within some families. I have basic knowledge of the language as my mother speaks it and I've seen my mother speak to different people in Gib purely in Maltese! Peter Caruana is of Maltese descent. We definately need more sources. I'll see what I can do myself to improve. Anyone considering buying the book that Gibnews mentioned Twin Rocks? Gibmetal 77talk 20:47, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

text: I already added the section on notable Gibraltarians of Maltese descent. I added Caruana but I'm having some trouble thinking of who else to include. Don't forget the Maltese influence on Gibraltarian cuisine! Gibmetal 77talk 14:52, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

text: Wouldn't the word Notable be better than Famous in Famous Gibraltarians of Maltese Descent. Just a suggestion. Gibmetal 77talk 17:54, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

text: I added Dr. Zammit because he received an MBE some months before his death due to his cultural teachings to local youth through his dramatical productions. I might need to rephrase his description a bit better. Gibmetal 77talk 00:21, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Getting the ball rolling
Talk:Qiajivik Mountain

message: May mean "Enormous Weeper" (reference: ). -- pne (talk) 14:39, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meaning 
Talk:Beanie Wells

message: jordan, change the first sentance, it doesnt flow well  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.254.161.138 (talk) 01:40, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  first sentance 

message: Any relation to Jonathan Wells (American football)? or that other OSU back named Wells? RF23 (talk) 21:07, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Relation?
Talk:Phyllis Dare

message: I have cited a book which is the source of this information, and a website where the information, including an image of the newspaper report, is more easily accessible. MerielGJones (talk) 15:27, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: User:MerielGJones, thanks. Can you add a page number where the information appears in the book?  -- Ssilvers (talk) 09:11, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes.--MerielGJones (talk) 16:14, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Libel case involving Wolfries about conduct of Dare and Hicks 

message: I've been asked to delete an infobox on this page. Can we discuss whether to have an infobox on this page? Whether the one for 'person' is appropriate?--MerielGJones (talk) 11:50, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox
Talk:Podocarpus costalis

message: I only had limited time to look into this, and it seems that there may be some greater access to literature about this in the future, but more definitely needs to be added regarding description, distribution, consumers, and life cycle, if information becomes more readily available in the future. The Amazing Matt (talk) 02:11, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  New information to add in the future
Talk:Institutum Judaicum

message: This article really needs updating to reflect changes of the last hundred years.  I left in the spelling "Leipsic", since it makes it clear this article is outdated... AnonMoos 15:47, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. It only took four years for someone to be bothered... --Phagopsych (talk) 21:34, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs update
Talk:Jonas Blane

message: I added a lot to this. He is central to the premiere and the whole reason why the Unit was shut down. Feel free to trim it down if you wish, but I think all the information is valid. Also, I forgot the name of the Latina girl whom was his contact in Venezuala. Arnabdas 15:52, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rundown of Season 3 Premiere

message: This is just far enough into our scope that I think it can be tagged as such. TomStar81 (Talk) 08:31, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: WPMILHIST
Talk:Mike Wells (defensive lineman)

message: Shouldn't there be an article about mike wells, the photographer behind "uganda," an iconic photograph.  Search mike wells in google images, no pictures of football come up. 99.225.198.95 (talk) 02:48, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Dunno.  (Why not write one, since you brought it up?)  There should certainly be an article about Mike Wells (quarterback), another NFL player, albeit one with a very brief and undistinguished career.  He was the reason for the recent move of this article.  -- Bill-on-the-Hill (talk) 18:08, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:Notability sub-pages

message: This page is currently a rough draft.  It is intended to be an guideline essay on when/how to create notability sub-pages, and what they should and shouldn't contain.  The authors believe that this isn't an example of WP:CREEP, as discussions have shown a need for better control over the creation of notability sub-pages (in order to prevent instruction creep).  Note that the concepts in this guideline have already been recently implemented in notability sub-pages such as WP:BIO.
Contributions to this page are welcome, but please read the following discussions first:
* Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 17#Policy rewrite proposed
* Wikipedia talk:Notability#Proposal for synchronization of common content
WP:CREEP. — [ aldebaer⁠ ] 15:57, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: * Have you actually read it?  I know that most editors will agree with the actual content of the proposal, but if enough people think it still constitutes instruction creep, then I'll change it to an essay.  That way it can still be referenced, but it isn't subject to WP:CREEP.  I trust you don't have an objection to that? —gorgan_almighty 07:51, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *Essay fits it well.  "Rules to create rules" is a bit much, but "advice on creating rules" works.--Father Goose 16:43, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Important Notice

message: An guideline essay on when and when not to create notability sub-pages, and what they should and shouldn't contain.  Discussions have shown a need for better control over the creation of notability sub-pages (in order to prevent instruction creep). Note that the concepts in this guideline have already been implemented in notability sub-pages such as WP:BIO.
Relevant discussions include:
* Wikipedia talk:Notability/Archive 17#Policy rewrite proposed
* Wikipedia talk:Notability#Proposal for synchronization of common content
—gorgan_almighty 10:19, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for comment
Talk:Podocarpus smithii

message: As of 2013, using the IUC reference given, I find that its conservation status is "Least Concern", rather than the "Conservation Dependent" that applied in 2009.  However, I'm unsure how to edit the textbox containing this information.
yoyo (talk) 15:15, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Updated. Plantdrew (talk) 20:06, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help needed editing the textbox
Talk:British Phonographic Industry

message: Much of this article appears to be a direct rip from the "About the BPI" section at http://www.bpi.co.uk/.
Despite the fact that this is not really very encyclopedic, I'd suggest that infringing the copyright of such a famously litigous organisation might not be a brilliant idea... ;-) 146.101.142.43 16:01, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Karen and Marcus Hilton

message: I have tried to make this article sound more neutral. It makes it much shorter, but I think it reads fine now, but maybe the original authors would like to revise the dates to make sure eveything is correct.  Anyway, delayed reaction writing this in here, but forgot to add not when I made the revisions. 89.242.74.79 16:16, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The peace movement

message: I do not understand why this page is being considered for deletion.  It is a real organization and event - although it is not a 501(c)3 nor does it have any grant monies - that's how these things get started.  Please explain the problem and it will be fixed.--Kirinv 16:39, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The problem is that there is no evidence of this event/organization being covered in multiple, independent, non-trival sources (i.e. newspapers and so on). Without such sources, there is no evidence of them satisfying Wikipedia's requirements for notability and verifiability. ~Matticus TC 16:28, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Jimmy Jack Funk

message: I got to this page by hitting random article and that is how I often find pages to edit.  I know that WWF was forced to WWE for legal reasons.  Should all old references to WWF be updated to WWE (as in the case of Ferrin Barr Jr.) who wrestled for a "legally" named WWF? Autkm (talk) 03:55, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No. If he wrestled for the company when it was known as WWF, then it should be WWF in the article. Hope that helps. Nikki311 17:52, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: WWF vs WWE

message: I uploaded a screenshot from the aforementioned clip, showing Jesse in Japan, 1996.  Notice that he sure appears to have two perfectly good eyes.:File:FerrinBarrJr.JPGI have no clue if Jesse makes the usual rounds, and therefore another photo can be taken.  Any info on whether the file can pass muster as fair use or not is appreciated.RadioKAOS (talk) 00:56, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo 

message: Okay, if there's no consensus for moving the page to Jimmy Jack Funk, I don't have a problem with that, but what about moving it to Jesse Barr? He's certainly more well known under than name than as Ferrin Barr, Jr. (is there even a cite on that being his real name?)98.243.94.83 (talk) 01:08, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another move suggestion 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. There is definitely consensus to move away from the current name. It may be that Jesse Barr would be a better name, but didn't yet have a consensus for this.-- Aervanath (talk) 20:22, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Ferrin Barr Jr. →  – Second nomination. Barr is undoubtedly better known as "Jimmy Jack Funk" than "Ferrin Barr Jr". Cagematch.net records 310 matches wrestled as "Jimmy Jack Funk" versus 633 wrestled as "Jesse Barr", but a far higher proportion of the former were on a national stage. McPhail (talk) 21:02, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 21 December 2021
Talk:School of Abdera

message: An editor keeps inserting the Modern Greek translation of the Modern English term for this ancient Greek school of philosophy. This translation is irrelevant to the article as per WP:NOTDICT. Having the phrase in Modern Greek would only make sense if the term had originated in Greek writings. It did not. --Omnipaedista (talk) 14:26, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Modern Greek name

message: - you reverted by redirect stating that the school of Abdera is more than just the atomists. However, in the Cambridge Dictionary of philosophy (2015) it states
Abderites: the Greek philosophers Leucippus and Democritus, the two earliest exponents of atomism. Even though Abdera, in Thrace (northern Greece), was home to three pre-Socratics – Leucippus, Democritus, and Protagoras – the term ‘Abderites’ and the phrase ‘School of Abdera' are applied only to Leucippus and Democritus. We can thus distinguish between early Greek atomism and Epicureanism, which is the later version of atomism developed by Epicurus of Athens. This modern usage is in one respect inapt: the corresponding Greek term, Abderite¯s,-ai, was used in antiquity as a synonym of ‘simpleton’ – not in disparagement of any of thethree philosophers of Abdera but as a regional slur.
Do you have another recent source that disputes this? If not, why did you revert my edits?  - car chasm (talk) 01:21, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scope of School of Abdera
Talk:Aliens Act 1905

message: The 1905 and following legislation keeps about 6,000,000,000 aliens out of Britain.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.158.207.21 (talk) 10:55, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aliens 

message: The citations taken from an article(?) Video(?) on Channel 4's website is a defunct 404 page.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamesbenton (talk • contribs) 15:24, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Channel 4 Citations 
Talk:Sacral nerve stimulator

message: I have just started to write this article as I am about to have surgery for this. It is a treatment like an appendectomy not a service- I have removed the reference to a company which provides incontinence products- the inclusion of this was an accidental infringement
:Greetings, I took the liberty of rewriting it. What I did was format it according the to the Manual of Style and added references to support the article. It still needs quite a bit of work but I think you may want to create a page in your user space about sacral nerve stimulation. Before you put it into the mainspace, have someone (maybe JFW or myself) review it before putting it out in the mainspace. That way we can point things out that may cause issues and such. I am not a medical doctor or anything but I have been around here a bit and generally know what passes muster and what gets deleted.  Cheers! Spryde 17:30, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: I

message: I think these two articles are sufficiently related that they should be handled in one article (at least until there is much, much more information about them).  WhatamIdoing (talk) 02:38, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: Work Plan
:I plan to expand upon this article by adding content relevant to Medical Uses, contraindications, adverse effects, manufacturing, and research.
:I will be adding more references that follow the MEDRS guidelines. 
:I plan to embed links to relevant Wikipedia pages such as Sacral nerve stimulation.
Hi, SleepyDO! I think the edits you have made are wonderful! The page is complete and concise. I think it is easy to read and well organized. If I were a patient coming to this page, I would find it greatly beneficial. I think one thing to improve on potentially would be finding more resources to support and back the information. Great work!
Studentdocvik (talk) 05:18, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: 2021-22 TCOM WikiMed Directed Studies
Talk:Bedford Preparatory School

message: How can this page be made neutral?
Raynerse 16:43, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This reads like a page from the prospectus!
Improvements could include the name of former headmasters.
Some history: for example, when was the "Inky" established, when did the prep. school/lower school system disappear, when were the houses renamed?
Formerly boys in the Inky played association football and were spared rugger, is this still so? 
Do prep schools pupils use the same gate as the Upper School, etc. 
In other words contributions are required to make the page come alive, rather than being a good example of a wall! Everybody got to be somewhere! (talk) 22:55, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page from the Prospectus?
Talk:2007 TAAG Angola Airlines crash

message: I think the quality scale would have to be START, in a heartbeat.  When I get really bored, I take an accident from the Holding Area, Google News for some very basic info on it, and throw up an infobox and quick summary like this.  This has no information, and in fact I think the casualty numbers may even be WRONG. --17:08, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of universities in England

message: Imperial is no longer part of the University of London.
Dates of charter and date of foundation both added to this page, as per the Universities in Scotland page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.42.234.230 (talk) 12:45, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: unnamed

message: There is no key explaining → and →→  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.97.245.57 (talk) 12:15, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the idea is to indicate that these are parts of a larger entity (like UCL, which is a university in its own right and part of the University of London). If you'd like to add a key, or suggest an alternative approach, go for it. - Pointillist (talk) 12:45, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Key

message: I've tried adding this to a couple of entries, and it is difficult to decide which date to use. For example, does Oxford Brookes University date from 1865 (Oxford School of Art), 1891 (Oxford City Technical School), 1934 (merged School of Art and Technical School), 1956 (Oxford College of Technology) or 1970 (Oxford Polytechnic)? It is unlikely that we can find the "right" established-in-another-form year for each institution. So I propose to undo my two additions and delete the phrase "while the second gives the year the institution was established in another form (for example if it was previously a College or a Central Institution)." Any objections? - Pointillist (talk) 21:58, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like a working solution for most institutions - London colleges are a problem though (as usual). They're down as being universities from their date of foundation in some cases and their date of becoming colleges in others. I wonder if the solution (as on List of UK universities by date of foundation is simply to put the London colleges in a separate table. Another alternative would be to bracket their year of foundation to match other colleges and not give a year for their becoming universities. City will make things even more complex next year by ceasing to be a university and becoming a London college. Any thoughts?  Robminchin (talk) 02:43, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year established in another form 

message: How come Leeds Trinity University College is not in the list? It became independent in 2009. IJA (talk) 10:45, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Leeds Trinity

message: And shouldn't BPP be listed? What other private universities? Whysacre (talk) 15:22, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: BPP

message: Please add rankings similar to this page:
List of universities and higher education colleges in London
thanks Pcll2000 (talk) 03:46, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: That article, with rankings that are seven years out of date, shows why this would be a bad idea. They wouldn't add anything to this page and they would go out of date. There are already rankings available at Rankings of universities in the United Kingdom, there's no need to duplicate that here. Robminchin (talk) 00:00, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rankings
Talk:IMAM Ro.63

message: Why are there two articles for the same aircraft? This one is the better (with it's own problems admittedly),so I endorse a merge from.
*Merge - without delay, nobody seems interested so I shall go ahead.Petebutt (talk) 18:05, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mergefrom Meridionali Ro.63 

message: I can't find any reference to this aircraft whatsoever.Any body any ideas?Petebutt (talk) 18:25, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Found three photos on flickr
*http://www.flickr.com/photos/sdasmarchives/4822782476/in/photostream/
*http://www.flickr.com/photos/49487266@N07/4822782454
*http://www.flickr.com/photos/49487266@N07/4822165055
Petebutt (talk) 03:25, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Avis C.4 
Talk:Bălți City Airport

message: Balti City looks like an airfield rather than a proper airport. It doesn't seem to have ever had anything other than a grass landing strip. Looks more like a crop-duster base for old AN-2 aircraft. Further, the whole airfield looks abandoned and/or closed on Google Maps (no runway markings, no nothing). Have there ever been commercial (not GA) flights from here (in the post-war era)? Is there any current info on this place? Xanthar (talk) 23:50, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Airfield?
Talk:Anglican Province of America

message: Apart from the Traditional Anglican Communion, the article should really consider verifying whether groups within the Anglican Province of America have ever sought a similar canonical structure to the proposed personal ordinariates. ADM (talk) 18:08, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed.  In fact the article overall needs to have its history beefed up.  Its skips a number of different parts including the events within the Anglican Church in America stemming from the establishment of Anglican Ordinariates. --Bruce Hall (talk) 02:59, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Talk:Personal Ordinariate