lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Embarrass Township, St. Louis County, Minnesota

message: 0.14% of 691 is, of course, 1.
87.74.242.210 12:17, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

message: I tried to find information about the weather station at Embarrass.  Apparently there isn't an official one, at least the National Weather Service doesn't list one, and wunderground.com has records of "personal weather stations" that report in, but again do not list Embarrass.  However, by googling National Weather Service Embarrass, I found a story about the beginnings of weather reporting from Embarrass, and apparently they do have a "National Weather Service-sanctioned thermometer" (and perhaps other equipment).  Anybody know the full scoop on this?  I think people want to know.  Nerfer (talk) 23:03, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Here's the link: http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C03E3DA1E31F93AA35752C0A9629C8B63&sec=travel&spon=&pagewanted=all Nerfer (talk) 23:05, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weather station 
Talk:Susan Hughes

message: Please expalain a bit more about her style. Markco1 04:30, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Style request
Talk:İzmir International Fair

message: Regarding edits to İzmir International Fair
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Cretanforever! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule wowturkey\.com, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links guidelines for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 19:23, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Since the article has a photo now, I have disabled the  tag. If there are additional/better images needed, feel free to undo my actions. Avicennasis @ 06:13, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: 
:Since the article has a photo now, I have disabled the  tag. If there are additional/better images needed, feel free to undo my actions. Avicennasis @ 06:13, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Disabled reqphoto tag
Talk:Adıyaman

message: == 859 and Crusades ==
History section:Then the area returned to Byzantine control during the period of the Crusades 859-1114.
The area may be under Byzantine control during 859-1114. But the year 859 has nothing to do with the Crusades.
 
Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 09:46, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The phrase including Crusades is delated.Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 10:36, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: History section:Then the area returned to Byzantine control during the period of the Crusades 859-1114.
The area may be under Byzantine control during 859-1114. But the year 859 has nothing to do with the Crusades.
 
Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 09:46, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The phrase including Crusades is delated.Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 10:36, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  859 and Crusades 

message: Adiyaman is not a majority-Kurdish inhabited town as the introduction suggests! Just look at the election results of 2018 as proof: The pro-Kurdish HDP received only 15% while nationalist parties has a significant vote share, not to mention the ruling AKP which has over 50% majority. Adiyaman is a typical traditional eastern Anatolian Turkish town with a significant Kurdish minority.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.234.34.120 (talk) 17:57, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kurdish population-mistake 

message: Adiyaman may be an ancient king or a person that trades on iron weapons.  This person or persons may be from Kanjamalai in Southern India. Wondering there are any relationship between Damascus steel and Kanjamalai steel (Wootz steel) and hence the name Adiyaman. 72.53.207.5 (talk) 01:08, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the name Adiyaman came from the ancient Tamil king Adiyaman?
Talk:Kırkpınar

message: Terrible writing and composition.  Deserves much better.  Whole irrelevant hitorical sections seem to have been lifted and pasted. Also the content is a bit lacking, not to mention some better pics.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.77.155.172 (talk) 06:50, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs Editing
Talk:Minnesota Woman

message: The first sentence and last sentence disagree.  Are the bones 10000 years old, or 3000 years old, or what? --Jwwalker 06:00, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age? 

message: I'm not an expert on the birth and death years of this and am only very quickly going through to undo damage done by  (recently blocked for persistent near-vandalism by infobox especially with ficitious birth and death years). Can someone confirm the specific range of birth and death years given for this woman? They seem suspiciously precise. Ifly6 (talk) 20:06, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth and death years
Talk:Aspendos

message: provided seating for 15.000  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.231.81.67 (talk) 18:38, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

message: Mentioned in Cicero's Verrines Book 2.1 chapter 53 Verres takes all the statues
Matterhines (talk) 17:34, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pillaged (after Alexander arrived) 
Talk:History of Kiribati

message: There should be more discussion about the American claims. Reaganamerican 15:02, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Fethiye

message: User:Gofethiye has reinstated previously deleted link, which appears to comprise lists of accommodation agencies, hotels, travel agents etc. It looks like WP:SPAM and it will be deleted again. Old Moonraker 14:59, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:SPAM]]

message: The climate data shown for December does not make sense. The average high for December(26) is much higher than for November (21) or January (16). The average low for December(-8!) is much lower than for November (9) or January (5).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.240.19.91 (talk) 23:50, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it was named after a famous aviator, Fethi Bey, killed in an air accident in 1914. Fethi, incidentally, means "conquest" in Turkish. 77.97.27.116 (talk) 10:52, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: I approve in the discussion Talk:Lesbos#Turkish alternative name. Greek alternative name must be removed from the beginning. We can use it in the history section. Takabeg (talk) 08:35, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Fethiye was a predominantly Greek settlement until 1923. Unlike Lesbos which never had a significant Turkish community. See WP:NCGN and stop this petty vindictive nonsense. Athenean (talk) 08:39, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Greek alternative name

message: Someone needs to fix  References >  11. Things to do in Fethiye (SPAM)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Qxygene (talk • contribs) 17:30, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spam removal 

message: How's it looking now? 46.31.112.222 (talk) 06:20, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too many photos template
Talk:List of newspapers in Turkey

message: == Yeni Akit on first place? ==
How is Yeni Akit on the first place in the list, if several other newspapers are much more widely in circulation?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.20.63.219 (talk) 13:49, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Concur. We already have enough on our hands trying to sort out tons of info, we really cannot be burdened with edit-wars over if Cumhuriyet is leftist, Kemalist, statist or liberal - at least not on this article. Baristarim 05:13, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: How is Yeni Akit on the first place in the list, if several other newspapers are much more widely in circulation?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.20.63.219 (talk) 13:49, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yeni Akit on first place? 

message: I think we should delete those 'details'. We are not to judge whether they are this or that, did they publicly announce such a thing. I am removing it, please do not reinsert without sources. denizTC 05:05, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Concur. We already have enough on our hands trying to sort out tons of info, we really cannot be burdened with edit-wars over if Cumhuriyet is leftist, Kemalist, statist or liberal - at least not on this article. Baristarim 05:13, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  To define or not to define 

message: Radikal is influential despite its relative small circulation, which is nevertheless higher than some of the other newspapers on this list. See the English wikipedia article on Radikal 50.83.12.202 (talk) 06:46, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where is Radikal?
Talk:Vernal Fall

message: There is some discrepancy within the page - one sections states that you can swim in the pool above the falls, while another section states that this is not permitted. Which statement is true? I visited the falls September 2005, and nobody was swimming, but that proves nothing. I do not remember any signs. LLP 04:42, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discrepancy

message: Many sources I've seen cite Vernal Fall as being 317 feet high.... yet if you look at the topo map, the main plunge doesn't look like any more than about 240 feet, +-40. 
In addition, four of the external links go to the same place; at least one other is broken. Unnecessary Insignificance 20:22, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The article needs to state that the official height of the fall, which has been 317 feet for many decades. This figure is cited in innumerable books (including every major print encyclopedia), pamphlets, articles, and web pages. Perhaps it could be worded to include the official height but reflect that it's now in dispute (ditto for Nevada Fall just upriver). I have no time now but will check back later and see about doing that, unless you'd like to get to it first. Rivertorch 01:23, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Height? 

message: There is a featured picture of Vernal Fall, why on earth isnt it being used in the article?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.72.3.238 (talk) 15:41, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Add it, or at least point us to it. —Ben FrantzDale (talk) 00:17, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  unused Feature Picture 

message: Hi; I found this page by looking for Lady Franklin Rock near Yale and found this image of Vernal Fall, taken from "Lady Franklin Rock", which isn't mentioned in the article.  The photo is form the Bancroft Collection so I suspect maybe is public domain and could be used to embellish this article.  But I'm wondering if there's anyone here who knows the story of Lady Franklin Rock and how it got its name.  Lady Jane Franklin visited Yale during the Fraser Canyon Gold Rush and it would seem that during her California visit around the same time someone had reason to name the California "rock" after her also (in Yale, she'd been popular with the miners there, who voted the name for the rock as a gift upon her departure).Skookum1 (talk) 14:13, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Lady Franklin Rock?

message: This old photograph of "Vernal Fall" might interest someone. Is it the same sight as the one pictured in the article? This angle isn't quite as dramatic. Also, the area looks more cleared out in recent photographs? Park service? Fire? Just the angle? 
Also, it seems to be earlier than the others. And the photographer Carleton Watkins photographed Mauybridge and Muir and is credited with influencing Muir. Worth including?
 
Candleabracadabra (talk) 17:57, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Vernal Fall]]
Talk:Pat Baldwin (footballer)

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. --KenWalker | Talk 08:27, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Organization of the Imperial Japanese Navy Alaskan Strike Group

message: A nice start, but needs some attention to spelling (macrons) and to wikilinks. Should Boshiro be Boshirō? Should Ono be Ōno? Where is Junyo meant to link to? It's a redlink right now, but Japanese aircraft carrier Junyō is not. Also, should there be prose content here discussing the organization of Japan's Alaskan strike forces? Thank you. LordAmeth 18:16, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This article should mention and have links to battles which involved these Japanese forces. --DThomsen8 (talk) 19:46, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: WPMILHIST Assessment

message: I'm not sure this adds much value. The ground is well-covered at the Midway order of battle. Thoughts? Hungrydog55 (talk) 18:51, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Necessary article?
Talk:H.I.S. (travel agency)

message: we have ordered E-TICKETS ON 19/01/2024 REFERENCE IS MWTTET/CA TIKET NO 7816060989239 ARRIVE TO SRI LANKA ON 2024 /03/02 AND DEPARTURE DATE WAS 2024/03 /22 BUT UNABLE TO COME BACK DUE TO SOME REASON SO PLEASE GIVE ME OTHER NEAREST NEW DATE FOR DEPARTURE THANK YOU 212.104.224.122 (talk) 04:49, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hi
Talk:İmralı

message: ancient bones, tombs and etc have found in the island that shows it has very old history. i think it should be researched more and the article should be developed  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rumeliaslani (talk • contribs) 01:54, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: If the island is 8km long and 3km wide, how can it be 25km squared? 68.97.41.114 (talk) 23:54, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Fjords? — LlywelynII 08:55, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Size of island 

message: A previous editor commented out the line
:İmralı was conquered from the Byzantine Empire in 1308 by Emir Ali, the fleet commander of Orhan Gazi.
with the note
:(I think there is a mistake here. Orhan Gazi's rule does not start until 1326.)
I don't have a source for the captain, but the 1308 date seems well-taken. I'll reinclude it with the source. I imagine the commander is also correct and the confusion comes from making a note of his later ruler, but that can wait for a reliable source. — LlywelynII 08:55, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Conquest
Talk:Marmara Island

message: The current map is good for showing where the Sea of Marmara is, but the scale is so big that you can't tell which island is indicated because the red dot covers two islands. Richard75 (talk) 15:30, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better map needed 

message: The Greek name of the island should be mentioned in a separate subcategory and not in the very beginning according to rules and regulations, as is the case with say Meis Island. 176.55.120.216 (talk) 08:42, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greek name 

message: Is listed here:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Naming_conventions_(geographic_names)
176.55.120.216 (talk) 08:47, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The guideline for naming
Talk:Giresun

message: There is no need to mention ancient names in the first sentence, the description section since the etymology is widely discussed in the "etymology" part as in the Kastellorizo. Remove them from the introduction. This is English Wikipedia and "Cerasus" is practically never used by English speakers. This is not a Greek city but is a Turkish settlement. Unreadedcontent (talk) 00:59, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ancient names 
Talk:India-class submarine

message: Tracks on the hull? Really? A 300+ foot submarine driving around the sea floor? Source please. And high surface speed? Not really.--172.191.4.54 (talk) 10:42, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Now, I'm not sure if it is true, either, but perhaps whoever wrote that bit about the tracks confused the submersibles carried by the subs with the subs themselves. Tracks would be slightly more plausibly on a smaller craft like that.--172.191.4.54 (talk) 10:46, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: As you note, the whole thing sounds dubious. I've just removed this statement. Regards, Nick-D (talk) 10:48, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  What?
Talk:Golf-class submarine

message: "In 2005 the book Red Star Rogue, by Kenneth Sewell, claimed K-129 sank 500 km northwest of Oahu on March 7, 1968 while launching one of her three ballistic missiles. He also claims Project Jennifer recovered virtually all of K-129 from the ocean floor." -- My understanding is that this is a controversial claim.  It contradicts most sources on Project Jennifer -- any corroboration on this?Posthoc777 06:52, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Düzce

message: == Dusae ==
a Latin (Roman) name of a small town near todays Düzce. Dusae > Düzce? Böri (talk) 12:20, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: a Latin (Roman) name of a small town near todays Düzce. Dusae > Düzce? Böri (talk) 12:20, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dusae 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Paşakonağı, Düzce. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 12#Paşakonağı, Düzce until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  –dlthewave ☎ 21:14, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Paşakonağı, Düzce" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Yenitaşköprü, Düzce. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 12#Yenitaşköprü, Düzce until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  –dlthewave ☎ 21:15, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Yenitaşköprü, Düzce" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Reliquary of St. Maurus

message: In the following sentence,
"The house of Beaufort cooperated with Nazi Party during World War II",
should the word 'the' appear between 'with' and 'Nazi'?
Rockthing 05:06, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammatical Comment: 
Talk:Ragnarok MMORPG

message: PLEASE STOP REDIRECTING THIS PAGE, THE KOREAN RAGNAROK AND THE CURRENT ENGLISH ONE SHOULD ACTUALLY HAVE TWO SEPARATE PAGES AS THEY ARE NO THE EXACT SAME THING.
::I redirected this page earlier because it looked like it was a lesser used term for Ragnarok Online. If you want to create an article on differences between the various versions I would suggest that a section on the existing RO page is the place to do it. Right now this article title is misleading for that reason. It implies you are talking about the general game rather than specifically the English version and may confuse people who are looking for general information rather than specifics. - Dalassa 21:26, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Since Lsean has not responded to this and there have been no further substantial edits I am going to wait 48 hours and redirect this to Ragnarok Online. I see no information that is being covered here that differs from the general page. Dalassa 04:49, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Kiruba shankar

message: Super speedy delete means exactly what it says.  In any case, I dont think it was necessary for you to comment on what you perceived as 'acrobatic' nature of my words especially when I had taken the pains to explain my logic at length on the same page and more so because, you didnt even vote and your only comment was useless to the discussion there.  Sarvagnya 20:25, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Super speedy delete [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bhadani&diff=89295623&oldid=89203303]
Talk:Albert River (South East Queensland)

message: Wolfdene dam was a proposed dam for the Albert River rejected by the Goss Government in 1989. It's between a bit of a topic after years of drought, followed by flooding in SE Queensland. There isn't much verifiable material on the 'net about the dam - a few blogs and various commentary serving their own political interests.
Does someone have some better factual information, particularly from Government reports at the time? For example, proposed costs, location, storage area, rainfall patters etc?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Damien d (talk • contribs) 23:39, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wolfdene dam 
Talk:Lower Manhattan Expressway

message: I realize that this was a controversial proposal but it needn't sound so negative. Jgcarter 05:21, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: But is still must be neutral...no matter what Jgcarter 23:52, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  The wiki-phrase is "neutral" but a better term is "objective". "Objective" does not always mean "neutral", especially when logical reasoning based on objective facts militates against something or other. In such a case, would "neutral" be desirable? SWalkerTTU 03:56, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I mean, the article should favor both sides of the argument. I was just throwing that out to whoever wants to do it Jgcarter 04:08, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutral?
Talk:Ross River (Queensland)

message: Is the source of the river Lake Gleeson or Ross River Dam? The article claims it is both. A reference either way should clarify this. - Shiftchange (talk) 23:52, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The river is fed by Ross Lake, an artifical lake created by the damming of the Ross River in the mid-1970s at Five Heads Creek. I am however, unsure whether the river was previously fed by Lake Gleeson or even Lake Gleeson feeds Lake Ross. I am not even aware of a Lake Gleeson (though this may have been a former lake covered by the damming of the river). I will investigate this further. - Twistie.man (talk) 13:26, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Rivers of New South Wales

message: NSW River Sites Daily River Report lists the most recent water information for monitored rivers in New South Wales. It seems to list many rivers which are not on this list. I will work at incorporating all of them onto our list.Garrie 23:29, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That site includes a state-wide map but it is copyright NSW Government 2002-2005. I don't know how we'd go using a fair-use map?Garrie 23:41, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NSW River Sites Daily River Report
Talk:MS Spirit of Tasmania

message: I don’t believe that it is a good idea at all to merge any of the stated articles because TT-line is the owner of the ships not the ships them selves. I agree the spirit of Tasmania article has moved away from it original purpose going to much in to TT-line and not enough to the ships but it still needs to remain independent to TT-line as it is about the ships not the company so with saying that I think the devil cat should not be on that page because it has nothing to do with spirit of Tasmania but TT-line and I think the page could speak more on the ships them self’s maybe even a disambiguation with each ship having its own page as is the case with the original spirit, Abel Tasman and the devil cat. Merging these articles would be like merging the Toyota corolla with Toyota just because Toyota makes the car it dose not mean all the cars history and specs should be put on that page. Mbruce1 06:23, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If anything the article should be merged with M/S Princess of Norway and given that name. Red Fox 14:46, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

text: I'd agree that it seems silly to have two articles about the same vessel, just because it changed owners, names and routes. Is there an established precendent in a maritime wikiproject for this? That's a support for merging Spirit of Tasmania (first ship) to M/S Princess of Norway. However, merging a group of ships to their owner's article seems odd, especially if Abel Tasman (ship) and Devil Cat are not proposed to be included. I oppose that kind of merge, and would prefer to split each ship to its own article. --Scott Davis Talk 13:43, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge