lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Brave New World (Iron Maiden album)

message: "The Nomad", "Dream of Mirrors", and "The Mercenary" were originally written for Virtual XI, according to Adrian Smith in an interview. He said there was a fourth song, but he didn't know which one it was and that Steve Harris did not remember either. Assuming no songs were re-written with Bruce Dickinson, the last one could be "The Fallen Angel" or "The Thin Line Between Love and Hate". Harris denied that "Blood Brothers" was one of them.
 - surely it can't be The Fallen Angel, as (following the logic it wasn't a Dickinson-penned tune) Adrian Smith co-wrote that?
 195.157.52.65 (talk) 16:37, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Songs from Virtual XI 

message: This page here and the Funny Games U.S. article say, Brave New World is featured in the movie. To my knowledge this is wrong. There's also no separate soundtrack sold for Funny Games, afaik.
I will deleted the reference. If theres any evidence for that claim, please cite it. --143.50.212.155 (talk) 02:13, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Funny Games U.S. 

message: I'm 90% sure that The Nomad was played live as I recall Nicko McBrain describing it essentially as a real ball ache. What's the source on it not being played on tour?  Agent Blightsoot 19:00, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomad not played live? 

message: Why isn't this album along with the 3 others listed as Progressive Metal as well, they clearly are? Why on Wikipedia are we so afraid of adding different genres that properly describe the music? We just keep it safe by listing such a vague genre, when in reality, saying this album is just heavy metal is quite innacurate.
World wrestling federation ztj (talk) 17:46, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Iron Maiden has NO progressive metal albums in their catalogue. So including it in their album infoboxes would be a false information. 198.164.219.128 (talk) 22:20, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre
Talk:Piece of Mind

message: Would it be OK to upload audio sample of the "hidden message" played forward and backward? I'm not sure if fair use does permit me to do it. --Piotr Mitas (talk) 14:46, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been over 35 years since it was released, so I don't see the harm. What's the worst that could happen? FiggazWithAttitude (talk) 19:42, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Audio sample? 

message: In Background it states "This is the first of five Iron Maiden albums that were not named after a song featured on the album itself" - nice bit of trivia, but meaningless. What were the other four? Name them from memory and I'll buy you a pint of Trooper! FiggazWithAttitude (talk) 19:42, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia
Talk:Steady Diet of Nothing

message: Since most people consider 13 Songs to be one album, even though it is in fact a complilation of two EPs, should Steady Diet  be considered the third album, rather than the second?
How could "Dear Justice Letter" be inspired by the death of William J. Brennan if it was recorded in 1991 and Brennan did not die until six years later?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:6000:9A80:4100:357C:C96B:93DB:EDF6 (talk) 05:47, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:Chantal Kreviazuk albums

message: The following discussion comes from Wikipedia:Categories for deletion. The consensus was to keep this category. -Aranel ("Sarah") 20:17, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: CfD discussion

message: *Perhaps the Beatles or the Beach Boys albums would merit a category, but does this?  PedanticallySpeaking 19:11, Nov 5, 2004 (UTC)
*Keep.  Makes the albums reachable from :category:albums by artist.  -- Rick Block 17:02, 6 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [[:Category:Chantal Kreviazuk albums]]
Talk:Bon Voyage! (shop)

message: This shop is not called Von Voyage, it is called Bon Voyage! Someone please change the title!
:Done – (empoor) 19:14, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: Does this article belong in Wikipedia? Does every shop within any Disney park need an article? If not, why does this shop need an article? - Ac44ck (talk) 18:28, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Delete?
Talk:First sergeant

message: Needs a separate section detailing the rank in the U.S. Marine Corps, where it is not a billet. Fox1 20:49, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, yes it is both a billet, and a grade of rank; every company or battery has a TO billet for a First Sergeant, the prescribed rank for the position is, of course, first sergeant. CobraDragoon (talk) 17:13, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

text: I served in the USMC'87-'92, and the top ranking NCO was always referred to as "Top."  Might be a 1stSGT, might be a Master Guns.  No Idea why this isn't reflected in the USMC section. O0drogue0o (talk) 19:05, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Marine Corps

message: Is it necessary or useful to have a whole course outline within an article that is about the rank not the course?  Unless someone offers a reason not to, I propose removal of the course-related information.  Highspeed (talk) 16:12, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No opposition registered. Done  Highspeed (talk) 15:06, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: U.S. Army 1SG Course

message: This may appear way wrong, but it reflects the view of the Swedish Armed Forces, not my own. --Malin Randstrom (talk) 16:43, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Swedish 1SG 

message: Shouldnt the First shirt page be a subcategory on this page instead of having its own page? 74.180.79.68 (talk) 05:00, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd propose a redirect from the First Shirt page to a section of this page with the same info. Sf46 (talk) 03:02, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  First Shirt?? 

message: (Moved below paragraph, verbatim, from the article as inappropriate encyclopedic content. Should anyone have the capability to cite a valid, reliable,verifiable, documentable, source for any of the below anecdotal/personal comments, then by all means proceed and the Wikipedia community will evaluate it accordingly. Thank you.)
 
It is often said that a commanding officer commands a company-level unit, but a first sergeant "runs" it. (You can tell a first sergeant wrote this, because he has no idea what goes on in any MOS, that is intelligence based) Many units are directly impacted by the strength of the first sergeant. Some Army National Guard first sergeants remained in their state  guard under Title 32 USC until just shy of their 62nd birthday, and would stay in one company-level unit for decades, thus having more years in the first sergeant position than the age of a new captain or first lieutenant commanding officer. This scenario, often fondly referred to by Guard troops as "Top For Life" or "TFL", for long-serving guard first sergeants, became more rare since the mass federal combat deployments and call-ups beginning in the Gulf War era, when most states adopted some type of a statewide guard promotion system vs. internal unit promotions in the National Guards. This caused most leadership positions to rotate more frequently, limiting the tenure of most first sergeants.
(Above section created by, and referenced paragraph moved by:CobraDragoon (talk) 00:52, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  United States Army — Uncited commentary/opinion on the duties and qualifications of modern incumbants
Talk:Homelessness in the United States

message: The color coded map of absolute count of homeless people per state is so misleading as to be useless.
This map should display homeless people per capita. (e.g. Per Capita Homeless Map)
Otherwise, the map just tells people that there are more people in New York than Vermont.
The fact that the map was sourced from the US government does not excuse this egregious violation of statistical visualization best practice.
: I happened upon this graphic on TikTok, so I had to hunt it down. Agreed, this is extremely misleading. Happy to offer my services in updating the map; however, I am not a researcher. Is anyone able to offer a recent per-capita study of homelessness in the United States? This Business Insider map is great inspiration; however, it is from 2019, and homelessness looks a lot different since Covid in 2020.
Vitalen1 (talk)  — Preceding undated comment added 13:48, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Color Coded Map Should be Per Capita 

message: This is really great work! I just have a few notes from my peer review:
- I would perhaps explain a little bit more about what Housing First is earlier on in that section so those unfamiliar with the policy can grasp what exactly the approach means before you dive into the rest of the section.
- Maybe consider linking to more pages! Since this article is such a broad topic, it might be helpful to outsource some information to other articles.
- With the “Comprehensive health care” section, I would just make sure to jump straight to the point and clarify in what way you’re discussing health care.
- I may also reword “Situations in specific U.S. cities and states” to something like “Specific cases” or something a bit more concise.
Skyef25 (talk) 03:52, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contribution Peer Review 

message: The contents of this specific article are nicely done, and it has a vast amount of information. I just would like to suggest one thing. The article is great with knowledge and depth of the causes of homelessness, but it feels that it could improve the length. Some content should be added to the 21st century as it could  add more details the "Homelessness in the United States."  Maybe adding more updates from 2010 and into the current time frame. Adding more depth to that section provides better suitable details of the current topic in question. That is my only suggestion to reclarify that this article is a great source of knowledge.  IcecreamintheDark 9891 (talk) 04:01, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contribution Peer Review
Talk:King (chess)

message: Can the King move two spaces vertically or horizonally when not in check?
:The only time the king can move anything other than one sqaure at a time is as part of castling. --Camembert
:A king may not castle to get out of check, and a king may not cross a threatened square to castle. Paul Murray (talk) 03:44, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: king move

message: If the King is in check, the player can only do three things: block the check, capture the piece that is giving the check, or move the King. If he can do none of these three things, the King is checkmated and the game is over.
: move the king to a square that is not itself threatened.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paul Murray (talk • contribs) 03:46, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The king cannot actually attack another king, since the other king would have to move into a position of check to make it possible, and that is not permitted. Another mutant 03:06, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  If the King is in check... 

message: A new tag says "its sources remain unclear because it lacks in-text citations".  It does have two in-text citations in the last section.  Bubba73 (talk), 01:06, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations 

message: "Although the king is the most important piece, it is usually the weakest piece in the game until a later phase, the endgame."
What exactly is meant by "weak" in this sentence? I always thought of the king as far more powerful than the pawn.86.181.150.222 (talk) 11:46, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: That is probably using "piece" in the sense of not a pawn.  Early on it isn't too powerful, but that increases in the endgame.  It is extremely powerful when there are only kings and pawns left.  It may be stronger than knights and bishops in the endgame, see chess piece relative value.  Of course, it can be balanced by the other king, depending on the position. Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 13:53, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the King really the "weakest" piece? 

message: FIDE Handbook: Laws of Chess
Is this a good source? Alshfik (talk) 14:20, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I want to add a section on Insufficient Material in 2.3, not sure if it counts as a status, FIDE considers it so. Alshfik (talk) 10:03, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes FIDE handbook is a good source. MaxBrowne2 (talk) 10:46, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is FIDE handbook a good source? 

message: See https://unicode-table.com/en/search/?q=chess+king
🨀 🨉 🨏 🨕 🨳 🨹 🨿 🨞 🨤 🨪
Alshfik (talk) 02:44, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should other unicode characters be included in the "Unicode" section? 

message: Players cannot make any move that places their own king in check. 2409:4042:261C:A862:E0A8:F38E:F1E2:E57F (talk) 15:16, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I do not understand why this comment was posted. ISaveNewspapers (talk) 21:43, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chess
Talk:Formosan clouded leopard

message: Hi, Menchi, the English name of this animal is "Formodan clouded leopard" (the first word is so weird). Please see . Can you correct it?  Many thanks.  P.S. By the way, thanks for your efficiency of creating this new entry, too. --Wdshu 21:40, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved.  A-giau 22:42, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Not extinct, reference  Jcfidy (talk) 15:40, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not extinct 

message: Leo1pard (talk) 18:15, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page views 

message: , would you PLEASE stop trying to ram this utterly beside-the-point factoid into the lede? It is of no interest to the reader, it has no connection to the topic, it is trivially discoverable by clicking on the link Taiwan, and it runs counter the most basic Wikipedia style conventions. We do NOT preface a mention of USA with "Northern hemisphere English-speaking sovereign federal nation", for reasons that should be bleeding obvious. Stop this. I have asekd for the page to be semi-protected - if you persist in trying to ram this in, you will likely just find yourself unable to edit the page at all. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 16:12, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Developed country"
Talk:BATON

message: The article currently reads:
:BATON has a 128-bit block size and a 160-bit key. 160 bits of the key are checksum material; they doesn't affect the security of the algorithm itself but rather prevent unauthorized keys from being loaded if a BATON device ends up in the hands of an adversary.
This is certainly wrong. Probably what is meant is "16 of the bits..." but I have no information to verify this claim. Andrew 21:51, Nov 13, 2004 (UTC)
: Off the top of my head, I half-remember reading that it was 320 bits, of which 160 bits were some sort of checksum, leaving 160 bits as the size of the key space. But, as we (hopefully) aren't writing articles based on half-rememberances, I'll try and dig up an actual source soon! — Matt 23:10, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: BATON key size

message: Since late 2004, the lead sentence has claimed that this cipher is "used broadly throughout the United States government to secure all types of classified information". That may have been true in 2004, but is it still so today? One would expect it to be superseded by AES, at least for civilian applications that don't rely on algorithmic obscurity. –Henning Makholm 15:45, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, or at least, I think it would be good to get some reliable sources for this sort of stuff. — Matt Crypto 16:45, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Used broadly? 

message: Just want to say that this stuff is freaking fascinating. Probably more so than it would be if the whole spec were public. :) 67.119.195.43 (talk) 19:23, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fascinating 

message: "BATON has a 96- or 128-bit block size" was deleted as unsourced, but the public PKCS#11 standard specifies BATON-ECB96 and BATON-ECB128 modes. "Like other NSA ciphers, including JUNIPER" was also deleted as unsourced, but JUNIPER-SHUFFLE is in PKCS#11, and the glossary at the end of the standard defines JUNIPER as a MISSI block cipher, like BATON. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.7.68.35 (talk) 04:25, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources for some deleted material
Talk:Overcast! (album)

message: Perhaps the Wikipedia page "Overcast" should indicate that "overcast" is also a part of weather terminology?
Erland Lewin 12:56, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Otto von Bismarck

message: Should we list Bismarck in the infobox as "The Prince of Bismarck"? Векочел (talk) 02:44, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Please neutrally present the evidence, pro and con. Cullen328 (talk) 03:59, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I have provided a few sources from Google Scholar that describe him as prince: 1, 2, 3, 4. Векочел (talk) 18:42, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Whether he was a prince or not isn't an open question here.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  15:12, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for comment regarding his title

message: I think this should be skilfully Stephengulliver (talk) 21:27, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  skillfully  

message: template "main article" leading to "state socialism" is missing. Article "state socialism" is describing more of that content though the title is wrong. I already added comments on "state socialism"s discussion demanding changes in the title due to unprecise use of the term socialsm (marx theoretical definition and practical examples of socialist systems showed the governements property of productive factors such as factories, tools,...). WikiYeti (talk) 09:55, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  social legislation 

message: There's very little mention of his family, just a brief mention of his son at his deathbed.  Oddly there is more about this in the article on this son. PatGallacher (talk) 20:05, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Family
Talk:Allegra Coleman

message: I removed the link to celebritywonder.com, because that page no longer contains the said image. I will try and find another picture of the magazine cover and add the link here. Lazyd0g 22:29, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC)

message: The article claims "The fictional Allegra Coleman also appeared in 2005 romantic comedy film, Hitch as Albert Brennaman love interest portrayed by Kevin James. She was played by Amber Valletta."  This is false in several senses, most importantly that the character in Hitch was Allegra Cole.
I am modifying this portion of the article to reflect that the intent in Hitch was likely by way of reference rather than direct appearance (which is paradoxical at best).  Some Googling produces no attributed explanations, but the terms "homage" and "reference" do both come up. Ari (talk) 16:28, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hitch
Talk:Medieval: Total War

message: I am currently carrying out a major rewrite of this article, section by section, to make it better presented, more readable and generally in line with article policies. Some information I have or will be removed, such as excessive info, faction lists, game walkthroughs etc, according to WP:NOTGUIDE and WP:VGSCOPE. Should anyone have any comments on this, feel free to tell me here or on my talkpage QueenCake (talk) 21:28, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Rewrite finished now, alot better QueenCake (talk) 21:51, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think you should learn how to spell a lot first.  There is a free spellchecker on this forum you know.  Okay, thanks.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.106.61.194 (talk) 19:22, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Rewrite

message: It looks like the sentence "Glorious Achievements" are another game mode has suffered from a well-meaning "is/are" edit at some stage, on the basis that (name_of_the_mode) just happens to end in the letter 's'. Since "GAs" is a proper noun and 'mode' is singular, "Glorious Achievements" is another game mode would be grammatically correct. However, in order to avoid back-and-forth edits due to others falling into this trap, I rearranged the whole sentence. EatYerGreens (talk) 07:01, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Good Work, probably my fault :) QueenCake (talk) 22:04, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Avoiding a grammatical tangle

message: It has been released on Steam, but there are some issues making it nearly unplayable. It tends to crash when several stacks are attacking and/or defending.
91.186.70.2 (talk) 12:58, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Steam release 
Talk:Karen Duffy

message: Sarcoidosis only rarely affects the brain; it is generally a disease of the lung and skin (although it may affect virtually every organ). Saying that it "attacks" the CNS (only heart attacks attack) is misrepresentation. It is also often self-limiting and not "incurable". JFW | T@lk 22:44, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC)

message: Her surname is Irish. Wikipedia no longer has the rule about a person needing to SELF-identify as an Irish-American, for example in an interview. The Category:Irish-Americans page is now a repository for all those of Irish-descent, i.e. those with an Irish surname and not necessarily those that self identify.
Georgiamed (talk) 03:35, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Irish-Amesrican

message: Her year of birth was changed by an anon IP back in 2011, with no explanation . IMBd has the year as 1961, but I found lots of ghits saying 1962 - A lot of these probably used Wikipedia as a source. Does anyone have a definitive reference to her year of birth? Periglio (talk) 00:01, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Since we don't have a reliable source, and it's been contested by the IP, I've removed it per WP:BLP.  Dismas|(talk) 00:53, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed the year from 1962 (an unexplained/unsourced edit) to 1961, which matches the source cited in the infobox. A newspaper from May 23, 2003, says that Duffy was 42 on that date. Subtraction indicates that her birth year was 1961. Eddie Blick (talk) 02:38, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year of birth 
Talk:Domesticated animal

message: Should swan be included in this list?  Two species, Mute Swan and Black Swan, have both been wildly bred in captivity--the Mute Swan for hundreds of years.  But these captive breeds do not differ substantially from their wild ancestors.--Jjhake 22:55, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: That could work somehow. Leo1pard (talk) 13:07, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Swan? 

message: Leo1pard (talk) 13:07, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page views
Category talk:Methodists

message: For some reason, this category only contained U.S. politicians who were also Methodists (not a very large category).  I did a search of article text for "methodist" and added each individual who was a methodist (not just who went to a methodist university of school).  Still needs expansion.  --ABQCat 23:20, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC)

message: Several of these people are in this Methodists category, but there is no evidence in their respective articles that they are actually a memeber of a methodist church.
E.g., Ed Bryant. Somehow, he's in this category, but the article says nothing about his religious affiliation. Same for Rutherford B. Hayes. He attended some methodist academy, but that does not mean he is a methodist.
I think all these names need to be gone through, and the category removed unless the article substantiates significant methodist affiliation.
Nova SS 02:28, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  No proof for a lot of these people