Talk:Arma 2

message: I just noticed that the etymology section of the article probably outweighs many entries in the Oxford etymology dictionary.
++++  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.225.229.22 (talk) 17:34, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Reverted. Five first edits of the page in 15th April were all vandalism from different IP's. Hamarainen (talk) 09:51, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arma 2 

message: I think we should change the box art. We don't even know that is the real box art. For now, until we get confirmation from the official website, we should just stick to the logo. Legend6 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 00:25, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, the box art is from 505 Games website (official publisher for ArmA 2). I doubt they would create a fake image and put it on their website. Hamarainen (talk) 09:10, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed the box art NFUMR and NFVGCoB issue ... Dwarden (talk) 05:07, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Box Art 

message: That part in the feature sections seems like vandalism by an OFPE player.99.141.59.241 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 04:46, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bigfoot? 

message: I don't feel that a hierarchical section layout is the best way to display the Weapons and Vehicles subsections of this article.  Since this is merely a list of items with very little information attached to each element (some had minor relatively unimportant points of information not necessary for your average reader) I have merged them into a series of tables which make proper use of the space making the entire page significantly easier to read.  Forgotten Lords (talk) 21:32, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Organized the Weapons/Vehicles section 

message: The only 100% confirmed platform is PC Windows. The official site also used to state a further unspecified next generation console with the release date of to be determined.
However this information was pulled off the site recently, so I believe we should just stick to confirmed facts rather than speculations and simply not disclose anything other than PC as a platform until further details are revealed. DeadfastCZ (talk) 21:06, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Platforms 

message: As you might have noticed I've moved the page from ArmA 2 to ARMA 2.
The reason is that this is the way the developers - Bohemia Interactive - always write the name. DeadfastCZ (talk) 12:58, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  ARMA 2 vs. ArmA 2 

message: I know it's nitpicking, but towards the start of the article, a section says "ArmA 2 (often incorrectly referred to as Armed Assault 2)"
Though the developers have been using the "ArmA 2" abbreviation formally, it is not incorrect to use the name Armed Assault. The predecessor was formally named ArmA: Combat Operations, but was more often referred to as Armed Assault: Combat Operations. The statement made towards the beginning is incorrect info, and is much more of a bold statement that can't be supported; since it is claiming the use of the full name is incorrect, rather than it just being the full name.
I vouch that the term incorrect stop being used, as it appears to be giving many people the wrong idea about not only ArmA/Armed Assault 2, but it's predecessor also. 24.80.177.137 (talk) 19:33, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  ArmA 2 vs. Armed Assault 2 

message: Is there any more information avaliable for the factions section? I.E. the intentions of each faction, the "pairings" (Like Universal Petroleum vs. PLAV in Mercenaries 2), whether the player fights for/against them, etc.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by FlashHawk4 (talk • contribs) 21:01, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Factions 

message: Why isn't there a release date for US, is it not anounced yet or is it not going to be released in the US?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.177.230.218 (talk) 14:05, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: BI wiki says 26th June. Not sure if that's official information. Hamarainen (talk) 15:34, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  US Release Date 

message: Got an update to confirm the stores will have the game, however the UK's largest online retailers may have difficulty as a result of both the royal mail strike and in-store processing issues.Twobells (talk) 14:39, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Everyone I know had their copies shipped today, from Game, Gamestation, and Amazon. I know that's not proof or anything but I don't think it's notable really anyway. 82.19.2.83 (talk) 23:11, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  UK Shipping Update 

message: I feel like this article is lacking substantial information about the game. Compare the length and detail in this article and in the OFP2 article - this article doesn't yet do a good job of conveying the features of ARMA2 or even the range of weapons, vehicles, etc, in the game. It could also benefit from mentions of the community involvement in the game, given that there are already lots of missions and mods circulating.152.91.9.219 (talk) 06:49, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, since no one else was I've made some preliminary changes / expansions but I don't have the time to do much more. I figure a good goal / benchmark is the orignal Operation Flashpoint page. 152.91.9.219 (talk) 03:51, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This article also includes nothing about the Armory mode of gameplay, which I find to be lots of fun. Might want to include at least a mention of it. 96.18.253.190 (talk) 13:08, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article detail 

message: Steam lists a British Army DLC pack for Arrowhead which will add a new short SP campaign, as well as British weapons, vehicles and helicopters. Is it includable in the article based on that (ie. is steam a 'source') or does it need to be discussed somewhere? 203.217.150.69 (talk) 01:11, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  DLC 

message: Should we include a paragraph or two about the ARMAversum, as Bohemia calls it?  Operation Arrowhead ties in to the ARMA world-at-large, and Bohemia Interactive has created a few viral websites to promote the games, including one for the AAN News Network and the Black Element (now ION) mercenaries movement.
http://aan-online.com/
http://www.ion-inc.com/  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.49.75.54 (talk) 18:13, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  ARMAversum 

message: Should this article talk about this mod? This mod is getting a lot of notability and coverage as of lately. Eduemoni↑talk↓ 17:12, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I've been editing the DayZ article that someone created. I put a paragraph here and linked to the main article. If anyone could help with the main DayZ article it would be appreciated. Canwin87 (talk) 14:14, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  DayZ Mod? 

message: I'm not sure how to format this, but what happened to the picture and header? There's a mess of this:
AUS 20 July 2009[3]
|genre = Tactical shooter, Military Simulation, Open world |modes = Single-player, Multiplayer |platforms =Microsoft Windows
|ratings =
ESRB: M[4]
PEGI: 16+[2]
|media = DVD
Download |requirements = See Engine |input = Keyboard, [[Mouse (computing)|  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.130.3.207 (talk) 03:57, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture and header 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on ARMA 2. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add  after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
*Attempted to fix sourcing for http://nsf.znorq.net/content/reports/general/arma2/HH21_arma2_gc2008_presskit/ARMA2-TeamGameplay-GC2008.pdf
*Attempted to fix sourcing for http://ew.moricky.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:55, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on ARMA 2. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120609001021/http://www.arma2.com/agegate/agegate.html to http://www.arma2.com/agegate/agegate.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100330071947/http://www.arma2.com/arrowhead/arrowhead.html to http://www.arma2.com/arrowhead/arrowhead.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:56, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on ARMA 2. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120603071052/http://www.arma2.com/game-features/arma-2-operation-arrowhead-british-armed-forces-features_en.html to http://www.arma2.com/game-features/arma-2-operation-arrowhead-british-armed-forces-features_en.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130818005730/http://www.arma2.com/arma-2-pmc.html to http://www.arma2.com/arma-2-pmc.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110720231315/http://www.gamers.fr/tests/pc/arma-2 to http://www.gamers.fr/tests/pc/arma-2
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:33, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: For operation eagle watch it says in the description operation echo something
Is this a mistake or what Whytho00 (talk) 22:40, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Operation eagle watch 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:ARMA (series) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 20:50, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion in progress