lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Whismur evolutionary line

message: This page is a joke. Loudred and Exploud both direct here but there's only Whismur. There's no way to advance further in browsing the Pokedex if you stop at Whismur, and furthermore, there's no data on the other two!
:Um... wow. Sorry, someone redirected them without making sure that there was information on them. I'll fix that. -Amarkov moo! 17:34, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind, fixed already. -Amarkov moo! 17:34, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

message: Furthermore, I think it's kind of stupid that all Pokemon of the same evolutionary chain are all being lumped into one page. Having individual pages for each Pokemon made perfect sense, since we were able to have full information on one short page than a bunch of abridged info in one long page. I move that it go back to the way it was before.
:The problem is that for most Pokemon, the information which is important and sourceable consists of maybe five sentences. That's not long enough for a full article. -Amarkov moo! 21:47, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: But what will one do about the Basic and Stage 1 categories? Are we just going to lump the Eevee evolutions together into one messy page? Oubliette 13:15, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Evolutionary line"
Talk:Mini-humbucker

message: I'm going to correct a couple things in this article and just so everything is clear I'd like to point out exactly the issues I plan on correcting.  The first being that the introductory sentence is just flat out incorrect.  The mini-humbucker was not created by Gibson.  It was created by Epiphone and they were making them for several years before the company was purchased by Gibson.  Also, I do not believe this article is written from a neutral point of view.  The introductory assertion that it "is a smaller variation of the full size PAF humbucker pickup" and then the later comparison that, "It has a thinner, less powerful sound than the full-size version", are biased and misleading statements.  This implies that this pickup was created as a somehow inferior miniature "version" of a PAF humbucker.  That is not at all the case.  It was created by a completely different company, constructed in a completely different manner, and sounds completely different.  As it stands, the style of this comparison can only be said to be of a point of view that's biased, or ignorant, or both.  The whole first paragraph needs to be rewritten from a neutral point of view and if nothing else, at least credit the proper creator of the pickup.
--Bfarb (talk) 06:35, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Couple Issues... 
Talk:PAF (pickup)

message: The introduction says that the PAF was the first humbucking pickup, but then says that there were earlier ones. This needs to be clarified.  Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 20:57, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Even with mention of the FilterTron, it's still wrong.  The first humbucker was the Rickenbacker Multiple, featured on the Combo 800 model of guitar in 1953-4.  The PAF was only #3. 173.228.54.18 (talk) 18:48, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: That's interesting.  I didn't know that, but Rickenbacker also invented the first solid guitar.  They saw no future in it! --Deke42 (talk) 18:38, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  First?
Talk:Dawesville Channel

message: *Not a fan of the 'gallery' section. Suggest moving the pictures to coincide with previous sections. LordRobert 08:12, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Gallery
Talk:312

message: 312 AD or BC. It's not obvious to me! - Adrian Pingstone 08:25, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Year articles with only digits are AD. Year articles BC are called just that - 312 BC etc. /Ludde23 Talk Contrib 08:27, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, but how does the casual reader know that? - Adrian Pingstone 15:43, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Would you search for just 312 if you were looking for 312 BC? Would you talk about 2007 BC as just "2007"? /Ludde23 Talk Contrib 18:36, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: MD:Sojibd312  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.58.202.218 (talk) 05:56, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  01935836762
Talk:List of parachurch organizations

message: In order to make this list more manageable and to be more selective with respect to noteworthy organizations, I propose retaining only the list entries that have a Wikipedia article. It keeps the list cleaner and discourages spamming by non-notable organizations. If there are no objections, feel free to start removing the redlink entries in a week or so. ✤ JonHarder talk 14:20, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: List cleanup
Talk:Pity Me

message: From Gideon Longs blog  http://forums.gideontech.com 'Pity Me is one of several English place names which testify to the influence of French, imported to Britain after the Norman invasion of 1066.
The village was thought to have been sited on a small lake, and took its name from Petit Mere, the French for Little Sea.'
...   remember, the district was controlled by the bishops of durham who used norman french.
This is much more plausible than the 'pithead mere' thing because the name appears to pre-date mine pumps and, probably minimg itself in this district 82.38.112.68 09:07, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Old comments
Talk:Grand strategy wargame

message: While a distinct subject, there really isn't a whole lot of notable information written about it. I'd like to merge this article into wargame and wargame (video games). Really, this is a simple distinction that warrants a couple of sentences, not a whole article. Randomran (talk) 16:41, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I say go for it. The genre articles are growing to ridiculous proportions. Just last week we had to delete "Cartoon Shooter" or something like that. What's next? "Bear and bird action platformers with shiny golden puzzle thingys"? .:Alex:. 15:17, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  The goal of the merge isn't to "extinguish" information but improve organization and reduce clutter. There is already a section on grand strategy wargames at the wargaming article. This is in addition to a lot of generally relevant information about wargames. But if you insist on splitting this from the main article, I would encourage you to reference and expand the article so that it says something substantially different from the main wargaming article. In the meantime, I'll take the liberty helping to reduce the video game clutter. Randomran (talk) 13:52, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: Let's have a look: 
Colonel Warden (talk) 16:04, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This topic was already discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grand strategy game (also intitiated by Randomran). SharkD (talk) 22:19, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: By the defnition given, games such as the Sid Meier's Civilzation, and Heroes of Might and Magic series would probably be included. Imperialsim/Imperialsim II alsmot certailny would. Should 4x be mentioned as a sub-type of grand strategy? If not, is there a disticntion I'm missing? Dvd Avins (talk) 15:25, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe the term is reserved for games that fit the classical wargame description. SharkD (talk) 21:32, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Includes 4x games? 

message: This article has very old definition of grand strategy games. In the meantime, many important games not focused on the war - such as Victoria or Crusader Kings - not only established this genre as a separate & unique, but also moved it into the realms of economy, diplomacy, politics, rather than simple smashing tanks together. 2A02:8084:601B:7E80:7D9D:3D28:66C0:7B74 (talk) 10:04, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grand strategy games are not necessarily wargames
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/WipeoutZone

message: I for one who don`t want this WipeoutZone deleted and please keep this Wikipedia WipeoutZone alive for future history. Because Administrator took a long time to build his website up and running so well.
 Please don`t delete this for us.
 thank you.
I don't want to see this entrie been deleted by someone. Wipeoutzone is a real cool and friendly  site where all dedicated lovers of WipEout games may talk, compete, exchange and more.
Asayyeah 13:05, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform

message: The Guardian's Diary column suggests this new department is already being nick-named "Chris". A trivial point but it made me laugh this morning... doktorb wordsdeeds 09:26, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: DBERR

message: Do we not want to retain the old DTI page for historic reasons rather than redirect it to its successor? By all means link the two, but we will lose all sorts of information about DTI if we merge it into DBERR. Welsh 15:18, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree with the redirect, unless the pages get too long. I am conflicted as a non exec director but I don't think the description in terms of activities is generally accurate... at least that's not where the budget goes.  --BozMo talk 09:38, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: DTI
Talk:Leased line

message: leased line
iz teh bestez  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.83.68.90 (talk) 13:57, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's OK as long as it can carry IP traffic.--218.103.187.98 (talk) 08:28, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Previous discussions without headers
Talk:Hydrocarbon dew point

message: Reference 2 throws a 404 error. LorenzoB 16:57, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. I think that I have fixed that by replacing it with other refernces which are currently working. - mbeychok 22:47, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: In regards to this line in the article, "As the cricondentherm of natural gas is typically around 27 bar", I would expect you to refer to a temperature, rather than a pressure (27 bar).  Also, it seems odd to me to quote such a specific value when I would expect the value to vary based on the composition of the mixture? Batzer (talk) 00:18, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typical Cricondentherm temp of nat gas
Talk:Downstream (petroleum industry)

message: hmmm... the part about sulphur on this page seems a bit out of place, no? 
Rotor DB (talk) 14:55, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I was just thinking the same. Teemu Leisti (talk) 02:42, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Álfablót

message: The length on the first a arose only in Iceland, in the course of the development of Old Icelandic. The texts themselves describe the practice as something that happened in Norway and Sweden, where the word has never had a long a. There is no reason to use the later Icelandic version. 62.73.69.121 (talk) 04:05, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should be renamed to Alfablót
Talk:Ennui

message: I believe there used to be a whole article on ennui. It contained information, and had a section that highlighted the difference between ennui and boredom. Where did it go?
99.235.120.40 (talk) 21:56, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Apparently it was deleted as being a copyright violation. (That's what it says in the page history.) Aleta (Sing) 22:39, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

message: I have added a reference to the 1998 French film L'ennui, mentioned in IMDb here: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0168740/. There is currently no article on it. DQweny (talk) 07:56, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: New Addition

message: The entry was redirected to Ennui (sonnet).  I changed it back to the DAB page because Ennui is not just a work by Sylvia Plath, Sylvia Plath did not create ennui. --Jaguara (talk) 19:51, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: While I agree that Ennui has more than one meaning, you can't have a DAB page with no links.  Then you're not actually disambiguating anything.  Since there is only one article associated with the subject, it should redirect to that article until other articles are created. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 01:48, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect Removal
Talk:Helperby

message: Check the maps (and the aerial pictures):  Helperby is, these days, a satellite of Brafferton, which lies immediately to the north.  I've found several references that refer to them jointly as 'Brafferton/Helperby' and 'Brafferton & Helperby'.  I suggest that these two articles be merged before expansion.  Mike 10:14, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Røde Microphones

message: I speedied this for having no claim of notability. I've now restored it, following a request at my talk page. I'll monitor it for signs of improvement. --Dweller 10:14, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedied and restored

message: Erm ... their founders were called Freedman, so why is the company called Røde?
Ta, Maikel (talk) 22:03, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Follow standard English text formatting and capitalization rules, even if the trademark owner considers nonstandard formatting "official": 
Brettr (talk) 14:58, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: So there is a plural of "red"? You learn something new every day. Wonders of Wikipedia. I would have guessed it is an attribute, but what do I know ...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:16B8:5559:0:F4A9:48D4:D4AE:17B7 (talk) 01:58, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  plural =

message: There's a few instances where the article has some marketing-sounding terminology. e.g. RØDE products are meticulously designed and manufactured in Australia.
I think that this detracts from the article's quality. 72.19.61.30 (talk) 16:10, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marketing language
Talk:William Lee Knous

message: A fine article, this one! Randalph P. Williams 10:17, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A temporary subpage at User:Polbot/fjc/William Lee Knous was automatically created by a perl script, based on this article at the Biographical Directory of Federal Judges. The subpage should either be merged into this article, or moved and disambiguated. Polbot (talk) 02:33, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Bot-created subpage
Talk:Money transfer

message: Isn't there a system of money transfering used in the Arab world that circumvents the banking system? I wonder if the name maybe starts with a "w". It works the way that someone, say in Saudi Arabia, receives the money, and the receipient can withdraw the money from another person, say in London. There was some talk about this in connection with financing of Al-Qaeda a few years ago. __meco 10:20, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I found it so I entered it on the disambiguation page. __meco 10:41, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

text: iwant to exchage money of london to be a kenyan money 2C0F:FE38:2409:ECFD:1:0:B145:CE49 (talk) 08:44, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Arab world system of money transfer

message: Gcash |09604197384]] 49.145.35.44 (talk) 02:36, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/49.145.35.44
Talk:Ramon Sessions

message: Is there a better image we could use? This one is rather grainy. Kansan (talk) 05:20, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better image? 

message: It's been confirmed on the official Bobcats website (section Roster) that the Ramonster will wear Number 7.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.166.111.233 (talk) 18:36, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uniform Number 

message: Does anyone else think this article is up to GA status?--Bigpoliticsfan (talk) 00:56, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Looking for someone to nominate this article for GA status
Talk:500E

message: Mbzmechanic just so that you know I'm the one that deleted, trimmed, or otherwise edited some of your contributions. You should know that wasn't out of any desire to suppress knowledge or make light of your article. However a lot of the info you posted was either written in an informal tone or was more along the lines of personal opinion or observation. Not that any of that isn't useful but it doesn't belong in a wikipedia article unless you have a verifiable source to back it up. I understand it was your first article so I might suggest that you take a look at some of the guidelines for creating a wikipedia article; for instance, you didn't cite a single source in the whole page and you used images that I can tell were lifted straight from Google image search. Now I also want you to know that I'm not a huge wikipedia contributor. I use it mostly as a reference tool, but I'll edit a page a bit if I notice something blatantly wrong. I haven't created a page myself at all and I'm also pretty hazy on the exact rules for page creation (that's why I haven't made one). In this case I removed a lot of info that, like I said, seemed to be more based on your personal experience with the car rather than actual verifiable facts, as well as cleaning up some sloppy writing. In case you're worried that I mindlessly deleted valuable info, just keep in mind that I personally own a 500E and truly appreciate this unique automobile. I have done my fair share of work on it and have done a bit of research so I know the car well. I personally appreciate that someone took the time to create a dedicated page for the 500E when it was just a blurb under W124 before. But in order to create a respectable wikipedia article, you have to follow the guidelines. You can find everything here: Help. Hopefully you'll see this message.TheJoshdude 20:25, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Edward Windsor (cricketer)

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
*Support per nom. Doesn't appear to be a primary topic. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:38, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:The Lion's Busy

message: Here's a nice job for someone:  The Lion's Busy is available on YouTube (grabbed from Cartoon Network, so no doubt it'll be pulled soon).  Someone should watch it and come up with a better synopsis than we see here (and then remove this discussion entry).  Here's the link: 
Or how about creating an article of Beaky Buzzard films to replace all the indivudual ones referenced from the main Beaky Buzzard article (we'd still need that better synopsis)?
Mike 10:32, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nice job

message: Wouldn't that be more of a cameo in that Bugs only appears once (in a crowd scene) and, in addition, has NO dialogue?  WAVY 10 14:26, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bugs Bunny appearance 

message: I know about a Public Domain VHS that has this cartoon, and it is on YouTube in full. Copyrighted cartoons are always struck down when people try to upload them. But Looney Tunes wiki (an unofficial source, I believe) says otherwise. So which is it?   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.26.16.17 (talk) 15:40, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: PD or not PD?
Talk:American Council of Learned Societies

message: This is in connection with the copyright query on the American Council of Learned Societies. Please advise what else I need do to reinstate my entries. Thank you.Cfrede (talk) 15:02, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: For now you have done what needs to be done.  An administrator, copyright clerk, or OTRS agent will respond to the situation in due course.  You could also put the  template at the beginning of this section of the talk page to get an admin to reply to this thread, however it is unlikely that would produce faster results as administrators are volunteers also and tend to have a lot of issues to address.  No action should be taken for or against this page until the copyright issue is ruled on.  Unfortunately it is a waiting game at this point. If you have any other questions you may post them here as I will be following this discussion until the issue is resolved.—    Bill W.    (Talk)  (Contrib)  — 15:38, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Also:  I just noticed that the link you included in your above statement does not work.  Please edit to provide the curent web address (URL) of the content.  Also, it would be best if the Creative Commons licensing statement appeared on the page linked.—    Bill W.    (Talk)  (Contrib)  — 15:44, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: corrected URL above with strike through and insertion of correct address... Boogerpatrol (talk) 16:17, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

text: Your user page can consist of anything you want to put there.  Check out this article for guidelines.  Most users' signatures have a link to their page (as mine does) so you can see what other users have done with their pages. Click my name to see mine.  I've also added a welcome message to your user talk page with some valuable links. —    Bill W.    (Talk)  (Contrib)  — 17:08, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright issues

message: I've added the  maintenance tag because while there are four references, they are all published by the subject organization.  Wikipedia requires third-party sources that are reliable and verifiable.  Please help improve this article by improving the references. —    Bill W.    (Talk)  (Contrib)  — 17:38, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The article has many more issues than just a single source. I have expanded the tagging accordingly. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:41, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition of <nowiki>{{one source}}</nowiki> maintenance tag 
Category talk:Outdoor sculptures in Chicago

message: According to this list, made by the Smithsonian Institution, there are 435 outdoor sculptures in Chicago. Since it is a federal gov't webpage, the images should be ok for us to use. Speciate 23:11, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think this Category should be generalized or expanded to include the Chicago vicinity area as well as just the city itself; therefore I recommend the Category be moved to :Category:Outdoor sculptures in the Chicago, Illinois area.  H Padleckas (talk) 10:04, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's better to keep the category specific to Chicago. There is a parent article for Illinois. ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:55, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion of Category
Talk:Many-banded krait

message: Earwigs has one false positive, otherwise copyvio clear. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 01:06, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Right then.... 

message: The reference to Joe Slowinsky should be corrected as the snake has been re-identified. See the article about him. Sverker.janson (talk) 14:21, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Joe Slowinsky
Talk:William Clark (disambiguation)

message: A temporary subpage at User:Polbot/fjc/William Clark was automatically created by a perl script, based on this article at the Biographical Directory of Federal Judges. The subpage should either be merged into this article, or moved and disambiguated. Polbot (talk) 17:39, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Bot-created subpage
Talk:Joseph Priestley and Dissent

message: Breaks readability at a window width larger than 600px wide, as toc is unlocatable visually.  Suggest return to image right, toc left (standard). Fifelfoo (talk) 05:44, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Now changed. jonkerz♠ 19:02, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  use of toc right 
Category talk:Films set in Illinois

message: i would like to add the the film:musical-chicago,to this category.77.125.143.227 (talk) 16:44, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: The article already has the category "Films set in Chicago, Illinois" which is a more specific category.  78.26 (I'm no IP, talk to me!) 17:49, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  the film-musical-chicago