lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Alfred Hitchcock

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Shamley Productions. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 7#Shamley Productions until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 12:46, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Shamley Productions" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: We have this photo by Jack Mitchell, an important photographer. Can we fit it in somewhere?  —valereee (talk) 15:57, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: In the article it says having had 5 nominations which is incorrect grammar 162.234.206.89 (talk) 11:22, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alfred Hitchcock 

message: Hitchcock is often described as an auteur; François Truffaut wrote that “Because he exercises such complete control over all the elements of his films and imprints his personal concepts at each step of the way, Hitchcock has a distinctive style of his own. He is undoubtedly one of the few film-makers on the horizon today whose screen signature can be identified as soon as the picture begins.” Anthony Lane writes "I once asked a friend who had never seen Marnie to guess the director. Skipping the opening credits, I started a stopwatch on the first shot—Tippi Hedren's clutch bag under her arm as she walks along a station platform. 'Hitchcock,' he said, and I checked the watch. Twelve seconds." 2601:281:8300:9AF0:552B:C4B0:A82F:49A4 (talk) 21:12, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Cannolis (talk) 22:37, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 24 January 2023 

message: basic math will conclude that he was not age 80 when he died in 1980, having been born in 1899 2600:1702:3220:23B0:2CA3:2349:976F:95E9 (talk) 02:19, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: What sort of basic math would that be? He was born in August and died in April, making him 80 years and about 8 months old. When giving someone's age, we typically say the number of completed years. In Hitchcock's case, that was 80. --  Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 02:55, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  age at death 

message: why in the title it is mentioned as English filmmaker but in citizenship section it's mentioned as United Kingdom and United States Ashokkumar047 (talk) 08:56, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citizenship
Talk:August 25

message: Natsuyaki Miyabi Rklawton 18:15, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs article

message: During past few weeks Paris has been liberated at least three times in the selected annyversaries section, which date is actually right? :) Alsandro · T · w:ka: Th · T 20:07, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Liberation of Paris

message: This looks like vandalism, I'd revert it myself if I wasnt at work and being paid to do other things.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 171.74.248.49 (talk) 20:15, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Winston365 (talk) 22:00, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stacey hicks - great man 

message: This nonreliable source lists Pulchy's inaugeration day (Aug 25, 450) as a day without light and not an eclipse. Is that accurate and backed by reliable sources? Should be mentioned. — LlywelynII 22:18, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Total darkness

message: Similarly, this unreliable source records that Marcian was the first example of a Roman emperor being ceremonially entered into his office by the church. Any reliable sources confirm so we can add that to this article? — LlywelynII 22:22, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: First anointed

message: These do not have articles to support that they are a real thing. I will remove them shortly if there is no objection. --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 22:10, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  National Banana Split Day?  National Whiskey Sour Day? 

message: My birthday is on this date, 2004!  One of my former friends was born on that date, too.--27 is my favorite number.  You can ask me why here. 01:39, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hey
Talk:Infusion (disambiguation)

message: This page really should be a links page to infusion (beverage) & infusion (medicine), but dosen't yet have enough info. --maveric149
----
:Because infusions cannot be patented, there is little available research in regard to infusions.
Why on earth would that be? I seriously doubt that this is true. If a new medicine in the form of an infusion were to be discovered through research, there is nothing to stop it being patented. I suspect the real reason is that so far as modern medicine is concerned, an infusion is just a method of delivering a drug rather than the drug itself. -- Securiger 05:37, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

message: We commonly call this... tea.
:Only when it's made from tea (i. e. the tea plant).  Maikel 10:34, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tea 

message: I have removed this segment:  Long-term infused oils sit for a minimum of one year before opening in order to have a more concentrated, infused oil that is used similar to an essential oil by the drop rather than by the ounce as one would use a short-term infused oil. Long-term infused oils are prized for their vibrant colors, concentration, and use with or without essential oils as well as their long shelf life. because the propositions are false (it's simply not true that long term infusions take at least one year) and the style is not encyclopedic.  Maikel 10:40, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: ==Long-term infusions
Talk:Shor's algorithm

message: "Many public key cryptosystems, such as RSA, will become obsolete if Shor's algorithm is ever implemented in a practical quantum computer."
Are there any encryption systems that would not be obsolete if a quantum computer becomes practical?  That would be useful information to add here, if anyone knows.  I have been trying to look this information up but nothing so far, anyone have any clues?--ShaunMacPherson 22:06, 12 Apr 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: This is briefly discussed at quantum computer#The power of quantum computers. At the present time, only factorisation and discrete log based ciphers are known to be seriously affected (if a QC of sufficient size could be built). A quantum computer could be used to attack a symmetric cipher, but it's speed up is "only" to take the square root of the number of steps. This is a huge speed up for typical block ciphers, but is trivially defeated by doubling the key size. There exists a standard, thoroughly studied method to double the key size of any block cipher, namely triple encryption. Further, the most common key size used today - 128 bits - would only be reduced to a work factor of the order of 2^{64}, which is still quite a tough job unless the information is extremely valuable. And the AES already has 192 and 256 bit modes built in. So, at our present level of knowledge, QC poses essentially no threat to symmetric encryption. Securiger 07:40, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: The first few lines of the description of the algorithm state that the number N cannot be the power of a prime (say P^Q). How difficult would it be to implement an encryption scheme that raised a prime number to a prime exponent? That would seem to solve the problem as well, wouldn't it? -- TheLastWordSword (talk) 22:21, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  A power of prime, and any other perfect power for that matter, is trivial to factor by taking roots up to the log-base-2-of-Nth root of N, a polynomial time operation.--Jasper Deng (talk) 06:48, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Encryption schemes not vulnerable to quantum computing

message: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nvk8xU2BNnY Doug youvan (talk) 15:34, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Simple Animation of Shor's
Talk:1980s

message: Hi, would it make more sense for the map colours to have nonaffiliated countries as a more unique colour rather than blending in with the west. like green or maybe a more bolder orange as to differentiate. even grey or white would probably work. I don't know how to do this personally but I'm sure someone does. MishaQuinn (talk) 00:23, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map Colours 

message: It appears an RFC on collages on Wikiproject years will be interpreted to also ban collages in decade articles. Users here may wish to participate. Koopinator (talk) 07:17, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Collage
Talk:Nelly Furtado

message: I request that the infobox image of Furtado be updated to be more recent. 76.64.181.63 (talk) 02:20, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 12 January 2024 

message: Hi, you protected the version of the page with the vandalism still present which I reverted - I don't know whether it needs readding again? Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 20:50, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: No, the protection is a separate action and cannot be removed by reverting. Thank you for checking.-- Ponyobons mots 20:58, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Hey, by any chance can either of you update the infobox image to a more recent one? 70.50.199.125 (talk) 03:50, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protection 

message: It's very clear Nelly Furtado originally used the "Action Is" typeface for her logo. 98.195.26.147 (talk) 06:19, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Action Is typeface for her logo
Talk:Transcendental Meditation

message: "The square root of 1%" is 10%. I'm not sure what 0.00016% is in relation to 1%, but it's not the square root. 2600:1700:37E0:6890:7CCA:BDEB:A173:B2C8 (talk) 18:36, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: What they mean is: the square root of (one per cent (1%) of the population), not (the square root of one per cent (1%)) of the population. --Hob Gadling (talk) 06:02, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

text: I've rewritten that part of the article, omitting the 0.00016%. It appears that the global population was ~4 billion in 1974, 1% of that is 40 million, and √(40 million) is 6324.5553 (0.000158% of 4 billion) 🔥HOTm̵̟͆e̷̜̓s̵̼̊s̸̜̃🔥 (talk・edits) 16:04, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maharishi effect
Talk:HTTP

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved per request.  Favonian (talk) 06:40, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Hypertext Transfer Protocol →  – The acronym, HTTP, as far more common than the full name, and should be the title per MOS:ACROTITLE. Related articles like HTML, XML, PHP, CSS, API (the list is too big to name them all) use acronyms. Even HTTPS uses an acronym, so it's weird that HTTP doesn't. Zerbu 💬 01:44, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

text: Support. NasssaNsertalk 02:00, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

text: Support. netjeff (talk) 04:36, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 9 February 2023
Talk:Continuous probability distribution

message: Something should be added relating to multivariate distributions, a little more about mixed continous-discrete distributions (example of rainfall perhaps), and about general decomposition in continuous, discrete etc components. Melcombe (talk) 17:01, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: What more?
Talk:Pepper

message: I don't know if this is some sort of spoof or just a very poorly written entry, but this plant: "Ukrainian Red Midget, Puniceus minimum, pusillus, a.k.a. Ukrainian Mean Pepper or, disputably, Thai Hot" does not appear to exist.  The apparent scientific name "Puniceus minimum, pusillus" is, first, ambiguously formatted (what does the comma mean?), and, second, not a real name of any plant under the possible interpretations; there is no genus "Puniceus".  I suspect both the entry in the disambiguation page and the article on "Ukrainian red midget" should be deleted. Paalexan (talk) 19:48, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nonexistent plant? 

message: I've restored "various" since not all plants of the genus Piper are pepper.
Is it OK to add a brief one-line reference to a character named "Pepper" from  Josie (and the Pussycats)? --b. Touch 05:19, 19 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Certainly; the article in general should be broadened, as the word "pepper" refers to more than just plants.  Something on table pepper would be nice, and maybe a paragraph on metaphorical uses of the word.  --LostLeviathan 09:30, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: It seems rather odd that "pepper" only appears as a disambiguation page. When I came here, I was expecting to find an article structured rather like the one for Salt giving an overview of pepper the spice with links to further articles describing specific varieties. It seems to me that a disambiguation page listing the main varieties of pepper the spice alongside other uses of the word is not a substitute for a proper article. The article on Salt and Pepper does not help as it restricts the term to "edible salt and black pepper". In my experience the condiments salt and pepper can include many different types of pepper and is not restricted to black pepper.86.159.20.198 (talk) 14:12, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure how one would structure it, since there are a lot of uses that have nothing to do with the spice (though salt has the same issues).  I'd note that since white and green pepper are forms of black pepper, they're included there. Perhaps the disambiguation page should make mention of that? Acroterion (talk) 14:18, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Why no generic article on the topic of pepper, as in the spice, in all its forms?
Talk:Irreducible complexity

message: The June article addition about spontaneous formation of T-URF13 (here) seems to have wound up a focus to the exchange between Panda’s Thumb and Discovery Institute, and the use of labels “evangelical” and “flawed probability argument”.  I don’t think the June PT post and WP saying PT and DI have a spat is really DUE, or fits in location ‘Response of Scientific Community’ ‘Methods by which irreducible complexity may evolve‘ and that the text is poorly paraphrasing it anyway.  
So I am going to ping involved editors below, excepting Hob who asked for no-ping and the IP who I cannot ping, and ask thoughts on rewrite content and phrasing (or delete).  In particular about:
*Start with “Spontaneous formation”, to make the method clear ?
*Should the content have ‘spontaneous formation has been seen’, ‘PT and DI spat’, both, or something else ?
*Should the section exclude as extraneous the “evangelical” or “flawed probability” and “Texas sharpshooter”  (since probability is Specified complexity not IC) phrases ?
*What cites?  The recombination of T-Urf has Genetic and molecular basis of cytoplasmic male sterility in maize, Sofi (2007), and others.  But if I avoid the content of blog Pandas Thumb and a focus in PT-DI spat, then I only found one weaker source at Skeptic.com where I see linkage to IC mentioned.  
(pings) User:Pepperbeast, 
User:McSly, User:Dave souza,
User:Darwin upheaval, User:Just plain Bill
Cheers Markbassett (talk) 18:17, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite T-URF13 ? (Or delete) 

message: This deletion  was correct because the article does not mention IC. The edit summary  is nonsense though, since "complex systems cannot arise from simple ones" is Behe's false conclusion from "removing any aspect of a complex system causes the entire thing to collapse". --Hob Gadling (talk) 21:10, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion of Nature article
Talk:Gene

message: A review by scientist Denis Noble of a new book entitled "How Life Works: A User’s Guide to the New Biology" (2023) by Philip Ball (editor of the journal Nature) may be worth considering? - iac - Stay Safe and Healthy !! - Drbogdan (talk) 04:51, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Nonsense. Denis Noble is not a credible authority on genes and neither is Philip Ball. I haven't got my copy of Phil's book yet but I'm familiar with his earlier writings. This is very controversial and bound to get us into bitter edit wars. Genome42 (talk) 18:25, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Book ''"[[How Life Works]]"'' (2023) worth considering?
Talk:Tsar

message: How do we know that the contraction "czar" from "ceasar" was actually PRONOUNCED in the contracted way in such EARLY times, not just written? In Russia "gospodar" was ALWAYS contracted in writing as "gdar", but it was NEVER pronounced that way and was only contracted in pronounciation to "gosudar" in the 18th century. --Yomal Sidoroff-Biarmskii (talk) 16:05, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think the article makes any such claim. PepperBeast (talk) 22:00, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'm sorry, I didn't understand which claim. --Yomal Sidoroff-Biarmskii (talk) 05:20, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think the article makes any claims about the early pronunciation of Czar. This isn't a forum for general discussion. PepperBeast (talk) 12:21, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  The article claims it was pronounced czar instead of ceasar more than 1000 years ago, doesn't it? Even if the article DOESN'T claim that, I'm still pretty sure almost everyone reading this article will get precisely THAT impression. So, it needs clarification. --Yomal Sidoroff-Biarmskii (talk) 18:22, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronounciation. 

message: There are many paragraphs with no references at all. I've marked them all with "Citation needed," and scattered it elsewhere through the text. This piece could use much better citations. —MiguelMunoz (talk) 02:58, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. AXONOV (talk) ⚑ 14:24, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: User:Bulgarian.chad, I don't understand why the painting about Tsar Simeon by a famous artist as  Alfons Mucha, which has been here for years, is removed from the article and replaced with an obviously copyright-infringed painting by a modern artist who almost is not known outside of Bulgaria. Please clarify this matter. Thanks.Jingiby (talk) 03:04, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violation
Talk:Metazoa

message: Whoops; sorry about covering up the history link again by "fixing" that redirect. Here's a direct link: http://www.wikipedia.com/wiki/Metazoa&action=history
Bryan Derksen
Thats OK. The article is a huge mess and needs to be integrated into about a half of a dozen other articles - especially animalia. Metazoa is the old terminology for the Animal Kingdom. Much of the info in the article is outdated. I really think that the addition of scientific articles from very old sources is next to useless -- many of the names have been changed and much of the information is out of date and in fact wrong. That doesn't forgive the person who simply deleted ALL the content in this article and then provided a REDIRECT.  --maveric149
I apologize for that.  I was hoping to sort out the article but for whatever reason couldn't get the history to work.  In retrospect, of course, what I should have done is moved the content out first and then did the redirect.  If I help stub the phyla now, will that make it up to you? --User:Josh Grosse
That's cool. Sorry I lost my temper - but if I didn't catch that we would have effectively lost the info contained in the Metazoa article. Right now I am spinning off articles from a bunch of the info that is in the metazoa article. --maveric149
Yep.  I think almost everything that is of much use is covered now.  I'll let you finish up with what you want to export, and then we can set it back to a redirect. -- JG
Actually it's a Subkingdom and should have it's own article. It's used extensively in the taxoboxes and one shouldn't confuse it with animalia because it's a subset. Williamb 09:53, 1 Aug 2004 (UTC)

message: Metazoa is a more complex term than a synonym of animal, and is scientifically quite distinct.  i kan reed 00:44, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed redirect

message: According to most of the article, especially the taxobox, this is a synonym for what most articles refer to as Eumetazoa.--Crustaceanguy 00:46, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That appears to be true, but I'm not an expert.  Does anyone know if a redirect is valid? i kan reed 18:01, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: uh... I'd like to point out that animal is a really poor redirect, because Metezoans do not include Sponges, or some Gniderians.  The terms are hardly synonymous.  i kan reed 19:34, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, I probably confused you... What I meant is Metazoa is an outdated name for Animalia, and Eumetazoa is a subkingdom of Animalia which includes all animals except the sponges (phylum Porifera). In this article, however, everything is jumbled up and disordered, that is, the fact that Metazoa is a synonym for Animalia is correct, but the fact that it excludes sponges is not.--Crustaceanguy 23:44, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Synonym for Eumetazoa
Talk:Battle of Berestechko

message: There are too many images in this article, the third one doesn't even really fit.  I propose we remove the one at the bottom. Ostap 07:15, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The images are rather relevant, I'd rather see the article expanded to accommodate them.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  18:09, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess that does sound better than just deleting.  Ostap 18:59, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  images 

message: Can you give sources to the number of Polish troops that you provided ?
Shiden (talk) 15:40, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Question to Salaga

message: Polish casualties went from 7000 to 500.  This needs to be sourced. Ostap 22:08, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for the quick response. Ostap 02:35, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You're welcome Shiden (talk) 15:44, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: ХУИТА. Only Polish sources are welcome?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.200.181.154 (talk) 18:01, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Significant unsourced changes 

message: Were there memoirs of   Ukrainian commanders who fought in that battle ?
Regards Shiden (talk) 16:38, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Memoirs

message: The Polish poem is clearly in public domain, but can anyone confirm that the cited English translation is? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:16, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Samuel Twardowski]]'s poem 

message: why Polish casualties went so high??? 37.47.173.38 (talk) 18:42, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Significant usourced changes 

message: where are this numbers of Polish forces from??? 37.47.173.38 (talk) 18:45, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The numbers?????
Talk:Bohdan Khmelnytsky

message: Change "During the uprising the Cossacks led a massacre of thousands of Jewish people during 1648–1649" to  "During the uprising the Cossacks led a massacre of dozens thousands of Jewish people during 1648–1649"
Saying thousand belittles the slaughter, and supports many anti-semetic and neo nazi people who claim the number of murdered Jews was in the thousands and not dozens of thousands, during this slaughter Jewish babies were boiled alive and their mothers were forced to eat them. This is a horrible side of history that must be remembered and not belittled so people would understand the evil of extremism. Big-pini (talk) 09:06, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Lightoil (talk) 12:25, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 3 July 2023 

message: Why not to move to Bohdan Chmielnicki? born in Poland, suzerein of Poland, so there is already his name in Latin alphabet, there is no necessary of cyrylic transliteration, especially already in 1911 Britannica that was in use  83.23.8.118 (talk) 19:54, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to : [[Bohdan Chmielnicki]]