lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Heracleum maximum

message: I removed the link to a Swedish page, because that is about a different species, H. sibiricum, also sometimes called the Cow Parsnip - but H. maximum seems to have first claim on that name.  seglea 07:42, 30 Apr 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Just to be clear - it's spelled "Pushki" NOT "Puchki." In addition to the links above, which spell it "Pushki," do a Google search.  "Puchki" gets you nothing about Cow Parsnip on the first page of results, but Pushki gets you several web pages about this plant.  As I am from Alaska, I always saw and heard it spelled and pronounced as "Pushki." Rabidwolfe (talk) 18:28, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Semi-slang for it adds a t in the middle -- we Ninilchikans pronounce it more similar to "Putchki".  Man, I am SOOO glad to finally know the English name for this species.  27 years and I've never been able to explain to people the plant.  I'm immune to the phototoxins and often would "fight them" as "makeshift ninjas" as a kid, so they were a giant part of my childhood in Alaska.  That being said, we Ninilchikans also use the term "Nuzhnik" for outhouse, which we believe originated in Ninilchik as slang.  -- 21:58, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Names

message: Confusing 'Similar Species' Section
Every paragraph previous to the 'Similar Species' section uses the singular in reference to Cow Parsnip, then it suddenly starts talking about "these plants" in relation to each other as part of a group; it is very confusing, and should be clarified especially since it is a section dealing with similar, poisonous plants. I do not need to know how to identify Poison Hemlock on the Cow Parsnip page when a link to the Poison Hemlock page would suffice. (Malestrom (talk) 23:25, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: A late reply, but I have just trimmed that section way down. There was a lot of irrelevant material that seems to have just been copy/pasted from some other article. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:20, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Confusing 'Similar Species' Section

message: The first paragraph ends with "The classification given here follows ITIS." ITIS has, apparently recently, changed its classification. This plant is now named Heracleum sphondylium ssp. montanum  (Schleich. ex Gaudin) Briq. GRIN also uses this name. If this change is made here it should also be made on the Common Hogweed page, which lists eight subspecies, not including montanum.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnvalo (talk • contribs) 13:12, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The Plant List is promising an update shortly. It will be interesting to see what it makes of this. In the old (current) version, this name is listed as "unresolved". Sminthopsis84 (talk) 15:17, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Classification 
Talk:Chimborazo

message: Is there any evidence in the form of, e.g. ash and/or sulfur deposits suggesting that the 550±150 eruption of Chimborazo was powerful enough to cause the extreme weather events of 535-536? If so, are there any reputable scientists in the area with the opinion that Chimborazo was the cause of that climate anomaly?
2600:1700:53A0:63D0:6D15:1747:78C6:F080 (talk) 00:04, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: 535-536

message: In the section on "Farthest point from Earth's center" the caption to the third photograph states "Chimborazo volcano, the closest point to the Sun" but this is not correct. A full explanation is given at the following site - https://earthscience.stackexchange.com/questions/16000/what-place-on-earth-is-closest-to-the-sun#16001  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C5:2F20:4E01:BD8C:F1A7:2675:172B (talk) 19:41, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Closest Point to the Sun
Talk:Nevado del Ruiz

message: A quick apology: a few minutes ago, in attempting to revert an unsubstantiated anon-IP edit, I accidentally re-introduced some vandalism that had already been removed. Sorry. Feline Hymnic (talk) 19:22, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apology 

message: As redacted, the Geography and geology section implies that Machin is an ice-capped volcano, which it isn't. Also the USGS reference doesn't mention it, listing instead El Cisne as one of the 5 volcanoes. Maybe it should list El Cisne instead of Machin, or make it clear that Machin isn't ice-capped. --Canaima (talk) 15:34, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cerro Machin 

message: ;1st paragraph 
*"Between September and October" - meaning, I think, "During September and October..." (There's nothing "between" Sept & Oct)
*Similarly, from the context I understand "Up to 2011" to mean "From the beginning of 2011..."
*The sentence beginning: "Also beginning in 2010 were increases..." is awkward on several counts. It appears to jump back, chronologically; it is not clear what else was "beginning in 2010" - why do we need the "also"? We have "correspondent to" which I think should be "corresponding to". It is not clear what peaked in February 2012: increases in sulfur dioxide, or small eruptions of the volcano.
;2nd paragraph
*A comma is advisable after: "After seismicity continued to increase..."
*"The peak in March passed without a major eruption..." The peak what?
*It can't be right to say the alert was "raised"  to Yellow, when it was  at a higher level
*Be consistent about "Orange" and "orange"
*The following clunks a bit: "Over the next few months ash fell frequently until earthquakes increased again in June, and evacuations were ordered by the Emergency Committee of Caldas on news media for 300–1500 people." Some tidier phrasing, and maybe a bit more punc, would help.
*"indicating an imminent eruption, and an eruption 7.5 kilometers (4.7 mi) in diameter took place" - "eruption ... eruption" should be avoided.
That is all I can see. Hope this helps. Brianboulton (talk) 21:13, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: These should all be fixed. Thanks so much! ceranthor 21:33, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments requested on "Recent activity" subsection

message: In the article it says that the eruptions are Plinian. Here the Nevado del Ruiz is given as an example for Vulcanian eruptions: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Types_of_volcanic_eruptions#anc Which one is correct?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.197.136.53 (talk) 17:45, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plinian or Vulcanian eruption? 

message: I propose we move the 2012 eruption to the "Eruption history" section. Forich (talk) 13:50, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  2012 eruption no longer current
Talk:Pickaninny

message: The article opens:
Pickaninny (also pickaninny, pickaninny or pickaninny) is a word ...
I don't know what the intended list of alternate forms should contain. Perhaps an editor has fallen afoul of some kind of spell-check or auto-correction.
122.148.227.2 (talk) 10:43, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems fine to me. Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:17, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It wasn't fine when they made their comment but was soon corrected. (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pickaninny&diff=next&oldid=985021727) 2600:8802:571B:E00:4C92:A49F:111D:B31D (talk) 22:58, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bizarre list of alternate forms
Talk:World's Columbian Exposition

message: I just posted four images that I believe were taken of the World's Columbian Exposition by my great grandfather.  The family may have more of these kind of images.
I am not sure that all of them are of the Columbian Exposition and if they are not please let me know.  One in particular was interesting to me in that it showed the inside of an exhibit hall that I hadn't seen similar images of.  Please feel free to delete this gallery after a bit.  Any extra information that people could provide about the images would be appreciated. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davefoc (talk • contribs) 08:19, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The first image shows variously designed "church steeples"... located *under* the dome/ceiling of this... technologically industrial exhibition of devices. Did the priests compete with each other in showing off their devotion to god... at this... exhibition? 2600:1700:BA90:97C0:607A:E808:52AB:390B (talk) 21:45, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Four New Images  

message: Hi all - I uploaded a new batch of high-resolution images here. Please feel free to use; if you need any of them cropped, let me know. ɱ (talk) 23:46, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  New images - please use 

message: The links (see below) under "References" are invalid; they pull up the message "Safari can't find server." 
The project documenting The World's Columbian Exposition of 1893 – Website main page , About the project (http://columbus.gl.iit.edu/) 
(http://columbus.gl.iit.edu/about.html) SPM2 (talk) 19:10, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I just fixed those links. They should be working now. - Eureka Lott 19:44, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  INACCESSIBLE LINKS
Talk:Wikispam

message: Wikispam is not specific to Wikipedia. Other wikis also get spammed. Hence, a spamming redirect is more appropriate. Martin 16:47, 3 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: But spamming covers more ground than wikis. There's a need to address spam on Wikipedia, which is why there's a topic devoted to it AND a proper redirect: Wikipedia:Spam. Alcarillo 18:25, 3 May 2004 (UTC)

text: Wikispam is covered on the link spam page, not on the spamming / spam (electronic) page, so I'm changing the redirect. --Zundark 17:20, 4 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Arte

message: When I go to www.rtbf.be (RTBF runs the public television channels from Wallonia, Belgium), it lists "Arte-Belgique" under television. On www.arte.tv, there is a clickable RTBF logo at the bottom of the page. So there is a connection, but my French is not so good so it's hard for me to find out. Maybe someone with more knowledge of the French language can take a look at it? W3ird N3rd (talk) 17:29, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  RTBF and Arte, what's the connection? 

message: I've seen three different stylings for the name:
, e.g. in Karambolage. It seems 'arte' is as seen in the logo. How should we use the name? Shenme (talk) 05:41, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Styling of name: ARTE, Arte, arte
Talk:2004 Austrian presidential election

message: According to http://www.benita.at/artikel.asp?where=008875 , Ferrero is fluent in English, Spanish, Italian, and French (and German, of course).  Portuguese is not mentioned, so I removed it from her list of languages. Aleph4 09:09, 30 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Languages
Talk:Richard Aertsz

message: Article listed on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion Apr 30 to May 7 2004, consensus was not reached.  Discussion:
I find this article suspicious. Google finds nothing on "Richard Aertsz" which is not taken from Wikipedia. I've been unable to find evidence that a dutch painter with this name has ever lived. In case he lived I doubt the relevance of this article (which is moreover classified as Orphaned). --Gauss 09:42, 30 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Max Weber

message: This article has a sidebar saying that it's part of a series on capitalism. Capitalism certainly plays an important, perhaps central, role in Weber's work. However, if capitalism can receive a sidebar treatment here, I wonder why there shouldn't be a sidebar for religion, for sociology, and for Germany. Fellow editors, I am listing several options here for your deliberation:
1. Change the capitalism sidebar to a sociology sidebar, which I personally think is most fitting for this article.
2. Let's not have a sidebar at all. Note that scholars of similar stature, such as Karl Marx and Émile Durkheim, both have no sidebar.
3. Are multiple sidebars allowed?
4. Let's just leave everything as it is. --Tommyren (talk) 02:00, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd support your first option above, change the sidebar from Capitalism to Sociology. Thank you for reviewing the current status of the article. warshy (¥¥) 15:46, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

text: I am between option 1 and option 2, leaning toward 2. I suspect that Marx and Durkheim, like Weber, would be hard to fit into one box without doing injustice to another strong tradition they're a part of. I have no strong objection to any option except 3, which feels like it might be cluttered. Protonk (talk) 20:03, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

text: I changed it to a Sociology sidebar. Tommyren (talk) 13:46, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, after seeing what it looks like, I am now opting for not having a sidebar at all. The Sociology sidebar makes the lead section--which already seems a bit bloated--even more bloated. It spills over into the next section! Also There has been discussions on the sociology sidebar's talk page about whether it really meets the requirements laid out here in Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates. Tommyren (talk) 14:12, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. Protonk (talk) 20:40, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Part of a series on capitalism"
Talk:Cuatro Caminos (album)

message: why the hell is there a thing at the bottom about other things called Cuatro Caminos that have nothing to do with the album? shouldn't that be on another page???  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.113.150.153 (talk) 00:19, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Nemetschek

message: ----
Nemetscheck (not Nemetschek --- Article listed on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion Apr 30 to May 7 2004, consensus was to redirect to Nemetschek.  Discussion:
Orphaned, poorly written one-sentence advertisement article on a CAD company, with extlink. Lupo 11:03, 30 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Benefit (album)

message: Is anyone planning to add this?  Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 07:34, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  50th anniversary edition
Talk:Songs from the Wood

message: In the article it says they are folk rock, but in the little box on the right hand side, it says they are prog rock, as it says on the bottom. whats up with this?
This article reads like an advertisement.  Calling their live performance "unbelievable" might be accurate to a fan (such as myself), but it's hardly a verifiable statement.  This whole thing could use a more unbiased, less analytical rewrite.
:Agreed. It reads like a review. I have no quarrel with Tull or with this CD/album, in fact I am a huge fan and have been for more than 25 years, but the tone of this article is not wikipedia-ish. -- Terry J. Gardner 19:41, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I like this article. I think that it is appropriately written by a fan of the band. And Jethro Tull's live show is "unbelievable"...I can attest to that!
(Ceilidthbear 09:45, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  I like it! 

message: I don't have the cover of Songs from the Wood at hand but I always had the impression that the picture on the cover, showing Ian Anderson in a forest scene, is actually not a photograph but a photorealistic painting. Maybe I was wrong, but if not it would be worth mention it in the article. --Mipani (talk) 15:44, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I agree with the impression that the picture is not a photograph. But I don't know where to get information about it. I also thought that it could be a photograph which was overpainted! -- Tabasco da Gammla (talk) 20:58, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Front cover picture - in fact a photorealistic painting?
Talk:War Child (album)

message: As an editor at music mag Crawdaddy and to avoid perceived COI conflicts, I am making no change here. But I recommend that the favorable mark by the Rolling Stone review be changed to unfavorable. A brief reading of the review will confirm it: "Tull rhymes with dull" etc. Best,Asst. Editor, Crawdaddy! FenderRhodesScholar | Talk 17:27, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rolling Stone review

message: I was wondering if you think the negative version of the cover should also be included. Would that waste space? thumb|The inverted cover  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Timothymh (talk • contribs) 21:59, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Album cover 

message: I don't see the relevance of the Jewish interpretation of "Bungle in the Jungle".114.78.167.49 (talk) 18:20, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interpretation in External Links
Talk:Stormwatch (album)

message: Stormwatch is not a concept album.
==
I'm pretty sure it's Francis Wilson on 'Dun Ringill', and not John Kettley. Kettley didn't start reading weather reports until about 1980. Every reference I've ever seen about 'Dun Ringill' mentions Wilson, and it definitely sounds like him.  Halmyre 22:26, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That John Kettley claim was added yesterday by an anonymous contributor. The liner notes say "Special thanks to Francis Wilson, Thames TV weatherman for spoken voice". I've reverted the anon edit. --KFP (talk | contribs) 22:42, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have just fixed the grammar in a sentence in the introduction that doesn't strike me as being particually important for the article. - "With heavy rock and elegant orchestrations, the album presents energy, thought, intensity and an inner peace, ending with an overall sense of calm."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kuliwil (talk • contribs) 01:41, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strange introduction not to Wikipedia's standards?
Talk:Amersham station

message: I've moved this page in line with Wikipedia:WikiProject London's aim for consistency on names for combined stations. Timrollpickering 11:49, 30 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Page move

message: : According to the tube-map-overlayed-onto-a-satellite-photo I downloaded from http://www.geofftech.co.uk/tube/sillymaps/ (before it got taken down by some underworked overpaid lawyers), it might be, but it's too close to call compared to Uxbridge. Slovakia 22:21, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  http://www.tfl.gov.uk/tube/company/facts.asp says yes. Slovakia 23:47, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

text: According to Google Earth, Chesham is the most westerly. See here: http://www.tubechallenge.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=354 Crunchysaviour 16:33, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Furthermore, Chesham is about 300m west of Amersham here: http://www.streetmap.co.uk/newmap.srf?x=496500&y=200500&z=4&sv=496500,200500&st=4&ar=N&mapp=newmap.srf&searchp=newsearch.srf Crunchysaviour 16:40, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Chesham is further north and further west - but not by much Marlarkey (talk) 16:40, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Is it the westernmost Tube station?

message: The article claims it is but the article about Chesham tube station disputes this. MegaPedant (talk) 23:01, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is it the furthest from Charing Cross? 
Talk:Skyhook

message: Can someone give an example of the second definition? Kent Wang 12:16, 30 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The technology heading has some topics beneath it that are definitely not technology-related. I took a cut at editing the list, but the edits seem to have disappeared. Is there a special editing requirement for disambiguation pages?  Wcmead3 (talk) 19:42, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Technology: not!
Talk:Kellogg's

message: The article says "Kellogg's holds a Royal Warrant from King Charles III and formerly Queen Elizabeth II until her death in 2022." However the citation, which links to the Royal Warrant Holders Association, only lists the warrant for HM The Queen, and warrants become void when the grantor (the Queen) dies. 
I can't find a source for Kellogg's having a new warrant from Charles III. I'll remove it from the article, unless anyone knows of a source that says otherwise. DDFoster96 (talk) 13:54, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: yes, Kellogg only has royal warrent from the former queen, and could lose it (according to some sources, very likely) when it faces renewal after 5 years. i think we can remove this sentence now Weizhiii (talk) 09:14, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The warrant from the Queen expired on her death. Charles has not yet granted any new ones as king. I have changed it to show that they formerly held a warrant from the Queen. Lard Almighty (talk) 13:46, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Royal Warrant 

message: Now that Kellogg's has been split into two companies, WK Kellogg Co. (KLG) as the breakfast cereal company and Kellanova (K) for Kellogg's other operations, we need to do a split for the two now different food companies. Steelbeard1 (talk) 01:14, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Here is the link to the page for WK Kellogg Co. I invite you and other editors to add information about the company. Stockst (talk) 07:55, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: We should take most of the cereal company history and move it to the WK Kellogg Co article.  The resulting Kellanova article can begin with the introduction of the first non-cereal food, Pop-Tarts. Steelbeard1 (talk) 12:24, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Now two companies 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. While the numbers are not very clear-cut (looks like 3-2, against), the support column failed to provide any policy base for the move against the common name arguments of the oppose column. (closed by non-admin page mover) estar8806 (talk) ★ 21:45, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Kellogg's →  – current company name. Also, Kellanova is considered to be the legal name succesor to the original Kellogg's. VenezuelanSpongeBobFan2004 (talk) 01:05, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 9 October 2023 

message: The company is "Kellanova"and it has many brands, https://www.kellanova.com/us/en/home.html
The brand "Kellogg's" is shared by other companies and should not be the primary page to represent a $19 billion company. Sedimentary (talk) 14:42, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: This was discussed last year, and the consensus was to not move the article. 162 etc. (talk) 17:16, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Time to make this page Kellanova
Talk:Magic constant

message: Where did Paul Muljadi show that the N-Queens problem can be linked to the Magic Square problem?
David Bree 4/30/04
:I don't know, but I'm deleting that remark. It's duplicated in the magic square article, where it's more appropriate.—Herbee 20:09, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)