lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:P26/40 tank

message: Under the History Section, 5th paragraph down, first sentence: Does anybody understand what he/she is trying to convey?
:"As an interesting change of needs/priorities the number of machine guns were lowered from four to two." I think. --Sus scrofa 17:20, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammar and Style 

message: I've tried copyediting the text and if someone else could look it over I think the tag could be removed--Sus scrofa 00:39, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Aug 2007 Copyedit tag

message: I think this article should be fixed. As you see there is quite large white are at top. I haven't ability to do that. So could someone else? 62.142.194.26 (talk) 01:06, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems like someone changed the WWIIItalianAFVs template to wide, causing the problem. Fixed it by moving the template to the bottom of the article.--Sus scrofa (talk) 03:18, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: 20.06.11

message: The article name currently is Carro Armato P 40, but the Italian article is called P26/40, should the article name be changed? Semi-Lobster (talk) 05:06, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It probably should be, in line with the rest of the Italian WWII tank articles (M13/40 etc).--Sus scrofa (talk) 08:13, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: So any more opinions or consensus on a article name change? Semi-Lobster (talk) 16:02, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name? 
Talk:APC Talha

message: No references exist for this article and the information available is scarce. It is also unclear what is different from the APC Talha which warrants a separate article. Adamgerber80 (talk) 21:52, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Sakb]] 

message: Not many references exist for this vehicle. It is logistics variant of APC Talha and can be merged into that article since there are not significant differences between them. Adamgerber80 (talk) 20:45, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 20:36, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Al-Qaswa logistics vehicle]] 
Talk:BA-3/6

message: I think BA-3 article should include BA-6 description. After merge it could be renamed to BA-3/6. There is no sense in maintaining separate articles if vehicles had been produced in small numbers and have little differences (the most important being the tires). I like the scheme used in T-54/55 article. --Kubanczyk (talk) 08:51, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: --Kubanczyk (talk) 07:28, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposition 
Talk:BA-10

message: The article says the vehicle was first developed in 1938, but that it was first deployed in 1936. One of these dates is wrong (17 Jan 2017).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.69.182.4 (talk) 15:19, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Auther of the cited source was clearly in error, mixed-up with BA-3 or -6, those were known to serve in Spain. --Denniss (talk) 15:52, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflicting dates
Talk:Type 92 heavy armoured car

message: It seems to me like the Variants section simply repeats the same information that is already presented in the preceding sections. Is this really necessary, useful or desirable? Herr Hartmann (talk) 21:58, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a degree of repetition, but not completely and the section gives the general reader a nice little overview of the different models and their use. Kierzek (talk) 17:35, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Variants?
Talk:Type 2 Ka-Mi

message: There seems to be no nation of origin... That's kind of an oopsie. Intellectually I know it's "Empire Of Japan" but just in case I'd rather not make the change (seeing as it seems to want to go to Germany).Trying To Make Wikipedia At Least Better Than The Weekly World News. (talk) 18:34, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: No Nation Of Origin

message: There's a claim in the article that the tank could carry a torpedo on either side of the hull. There's no source for this and it sounds remarkable since there is no visible means of attaching or launching torpedoes. Anyone have better info than me on this so we can either cite it or remove it? 
DMorpheus2 (talk) 19:35, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know where that claim came from (or who added it), but will check on it tonight after I get home. The Type 4 Ka-Tsu carried two torpedoes but that was a different later designed vehicle, as you know. Kierzek (talk) 21:31, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

text: I check RS source books I have and no where do they state the tank could carry torpedoes or be launched from a sub. And the cite used for the sentences came from a website www.onwar.com which cites as a source of the information - Wikipedia. And Wikipedia is not an RS source. So I removed it accordingly. Just as it cannot be used as a RS source, it cannot cite to itself, either. Kierzek (talk) 02:08, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Torpedoes?
Talk:Type 1 Ho-Ki

message: The U.S. "Catalog of Enemy Ordnance" says tractor could carry 24 men.  See:
http://www.lonesentry.com/ordnance/armored-tracked-personnel-carrier.html  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.130.169.14 (talk) 04:05, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The U.S. "Catalog of Enemy Ordnance" is not correct. Based on Wartime intell. Not the first time it was wrong. The WP:RS sources state it could carry a total of 15 seated men. Note, there was room for a group of standing troops in the middle area according to some sources. Also, the article is correct now; it was designed in 1941 and produced in 1942. Kierzek (talk) 21:02, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Article points
Talk:M6 heavy tank

message: Just noting while buzzing through that this article seems at once pro-US biased. "ThE country luckily" had a high industrial capacity? Wasn't very lucky for the germans, was it? --TVPR 12:57, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editorializing 

message: I notice there are a few spex missing, like fuel capacity (477 USgal, 1807 l), engine torque (1830pd-ft @2100rpm), engine compression ratio (4.92:1), ignition system (magneto), transmission (three speed; two fwd, 1 rev), track width (25.75"), electrical system (24VDC), trench crossing (11 ft), vertical wall clearing (4 ft), & turning circle (74 ft).  Trekphiler (talk) 17:25, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Just the specs, ma'am

message: I've added a few scans to commons that show the various version from an old technical manual.
Image:M6 heavy tank TM9-2800 p120.jpg|M6
Image:M6A1 heavy tank TM9-2800 p122.jpg|M6A1
Image:T1E1 heavy tank TM9-2800 p124.jpg|T1E1
Might be worth integrating. Megapixie (talk) 15:15, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, indeed worth integrating. Bukvoed (talk) 19:41, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Some useful scans

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved.  – robertsky (talk) 09:32, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 21 February 2024
Talk:Lanchester 6×4 armoured car

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 18:43, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: The entire article still lacking any citations of references whatsoever. Unverifiable information should be removed IAW Wiki rules.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.142.225.186 (talk • contribs) 
:The article lacks footnotes, but is not lacking any references and/or unverifiable. See the references section, mainly . Bukvoed (talk) 10:28, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  lack of citations
Talk:Otter Light Reconnaissance Car

message: I can find no article for a museum by that name: is it correct? I assume that Honington refers to RAF Honington and so I have linked it accordingly. If the contributor who added this info meant one of the other Honingtons in Britain, please clarify it. 87.115.9.209 (talk) 00:37, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  RAF Regiment Museum? 
Talk:Birch gun

message: The claims about the prejudicial beliefs, political pressure, and the gun's potential need to be backed up by some sort of source. An article about the beliefs/pressure that led to the project being scrapped, or possibly some reference to a recognized expert on such weapons (to validate the claims of great potential), could be useful. Otherwise, we should find some way of rewording this opening paragraph. Nihixul 00:33, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Claims in opening paragraph.
Talk:Light tank Mk VIII

message: I changed multiple references to the same works in this article to a different format using the Rp template. As I had an immediate objection I have reverted the changes, although I still prefer the new format.This article with the newer format is available here if anybody would like to see it. I'd be interested to hear what people have to say.
An explained example of the new format is on my Talk page, section "References using the Rp template".
Pol098 (talk) 23:48, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Format for references 
Talk:Pansarbandvagn 302

message: On the 29th of may Sweden announced the donation of its entire stock of PBV 302 to Ukraine. 
The addition of a "Operators" tab with the information about Ukraine being a future user would make the page up to date https://www.government.se/press-releases/2024/05/military-support-package-16-to-ukraine--new-capability-to-strengthen-ukraines-air-defence-and-support-to-meet-its-prioritised-needs/ Daapse (talk) 08:32, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been updated. OhanaUnitedTalk page 15:16, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Operators section and donation to ukraine
Talk:M114 armored fighting vehicle

message: Variants
"M114A1 – new commander's weapon station allowing firing of the .50-cal machine gun from inside (manual and electrically-powered cupola), reinforced trim vane" 
The traversing of the turret and elevation of the gun cradle was done by hand cranking a set of handles.  The XM-26 turret was NOT electrically-powered.  The firing of the M2 HB-TT 50 cal. (which replaced a flex mounted M2 HB) machine gun was done "electrically".
"M114A2 – (1969, initially called M114A1E1) replaced main armament with a Hispano-Suiza HS.820 20 mm gun (designated M139 in U.S. service)"
The turret was also upgraded to the XM-27 which used a hydraulic system to traverse the turret and elevate the gun cradle.
I served with two units equiped with the M-114 A2 during my military service.
Roy A Lingle
Sgtscoutsout (talk) 10:05, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Small error in the Variants section 

message: The second sentence under the heading "Description" reads "It looked like a sleeker, lower M113." I realize that "looked" is subjective (which in itself is questionable for inclusion in an encyclopedia) but objectively the M113 and M114 were nearly the exact same height: the M113 was 8'2" tall and the M114 was 7'10" tall; a difference of a mere 4" is unlikely to be discernable by an observer. What is readily apparent is that the upper forward glacis plate of the M114 is at a shallower angle than that of the M113, which gives the upper hull a pronounced "wedge" appearance compared to the steeper, rather more bluff glacis plate of the M113. So I am going to change this sentence to "The M114 was 4 inches lower than the M113, and its upper forward glacis plate had a shallower angle than on the M113, resulting in a somewhat sleeker profile." Bricology (talk) 23:04, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Sleeker, lower" than the M113?
Talk:Fennek

message: Somebody should write to the "operations record" that a vehicle in the weight class of a fennek can't be protected against RPGs or IEDs as good as a tank.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.57.165.81 (talk) 10:08, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Armor 

message: Isnt' this comparable in size if not role to an uparmoured humvee? Could it be used as an armored light utility vehicle or armed recon?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Redhanker (talk • contribs) 21:55, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vs uparmoured Humvee 
Talk:Pansarbandvagn 301

message: The term panzergrenadier is not used in Sweden. The correct translation of "pansarskyttesoldater" is armoured or mechanized infantry. 161.52.14.139 (talk) 15:11, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Incorrect. The pansarskytte doctrine is the same as the panzergrenadier doctrine.--Blockhaj (talk) 20:31, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: No, you are incorrect. The fact that they have the same doctrine does not mean that the same word is used. The English word is armoured or mechanized infantry. Panzergrenadier is the German term, it is not used in Swedish. Please provide sources or undo the change. 161.52.14.139 (talk) 15:09, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The german term is used because there is no proper english term for that doctrine (see the article Panzergrenadier). Armoured and mechanized infantry refers to a different doctrine and thus it is improper to translate to and link to such. The Swedish article for :sv:pansarskytte is interlinked with the article Panzergrenadier.--Blockhaj (talk) 11:47, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Panzergrenadiers
Talk:Proper length

message: ... spacelike events in a frame of reference in which the events are simultaneous.
Doesn't it mean timelike? If I remember correctly, spacelike events can be in the same spot, but not at the same time. Timelike events, however, can be at the same time, but not in the same place.
: You don't remember correctly.  Timelike events can be related through time.  So they can be at the same place but not at the same time. Similartly spacelike events can be related only through space. --EMS | Talk 20:17, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  spacelike?
Talk:Tidong

message: I am a Tidong and currently I am working in KLCC. Im wondering why not so many people know about my tribe. I also would like to suggest so that GSC can be opened at my hometown.
Thank you.
Mohd Muhidin Asfar
KLCC
Tidong is low profile ethnic. Can be found at both Malaysia and Indonesia. At Malaysia from Kalabakan, Tawau to Labuk, Sandakan. At Indonesia from Sesayap to Tarakan and border of Tawau. 
The language of Tidong can be categorized in dayic-murutic.
Largely Tidong was muslim therefore they not categorized in dayak.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.13.180.98 (talk) 14:51, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: earlier messages

message: Help with adding WP:RS for this article  thanks SatuSuro 13:50, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Please
Talk:Lymphangioleiomyomatosis

message: Since "Lymphangioleiomyomatosis" is not a disease of lymphatic origin, the etymological origin of the term could be clarified.  suggestions?  Youni43 (talk) 18:23, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the The British Lung Foundation, "LAM mainly affects the lungs, where it causes an overgrowth of a certain type of cell (smooth muscle cell). This overgrowth occurs around the airways (breathing tubes), the blood vessels and the lymph vessels (a means of draining excess fluid from the lungs)." So it affects the "Lymph", "angio" (blood vessels) and "leiomyomas" refers to the smooth muscle. Colin°Talk 20:12, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

text: I added a link to the Wikipedia article on leiomyoma that should help with the etymology.Evaluist (talk) 02:24, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Need word origin

message: European Respiratory Society guideline;  JFW | T@lk 20:16, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Guideline

message: The original source is Pallisa, 2002. I have attempted to re-write or remove plagiarised sections of this article. LT90001 (talk) 00:47, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The plagiarized content has been reworded and integrated into the main article.
* Pallisa article, now removed.
* duplicate detector report
LT90001 (talk) 06:51, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagiarised segment 

message: Review doi:10.1172/JCI58709 JFW | T@lk 20:20, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  JCI
Talk:Hans Grüneberg

message: If his name should have an umlaut, should the article be renamed?--20.138.246.89 10:12, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it is easier to find articles without umlauts.  I have created a redirect from the name with umlaut.--Newport 17:08, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Embrun

message: The difference in population and economic importance between the Canadian Embrun and the French one is not sufficiently large as to deem one more legitimately notable than the other. The disambiguation page is to remain at Embrun; Embrun, Ontario is not sufficiently notable to merit the undisambiguated redirect, and every single article that links here currently is intending the French one. Bearcat 10:23, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Rich Fulcher

message: Re: the claim that his standup tour inspired the scene in "Spaced"- this sort of thing has been done in comedy for decades and I find it highly unlikely that the creators of Spaced would not have ever seen another example of a son fooling his mother about his alternative career. I'll leave it a week then alter that part.
::The creators of Spaced specifically mention this is the Spaced DVD commentary. WildlifeAnalysis 23:49, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Kien

message: Hi, I just think the page Kien should not be redirected to Bishamon (Darkstalkers), because Kien is a common Vietnamese name (just search in google), and it also appears in people's name too, such as shih Kien. Instead it should be a page for disambiguation. K 10:37, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Resident Evil: Extinction production history

message: Why does this film have its own production history article?  Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information.  Some of this information can be merged into the article, like the Game Head Special information, while others just aren't necessary, like step-by-step IMDb updates.  Does anyone mind if I call for a merge? --Erik (talk/contrib) @ 14:38, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging production history?
Talk:Howard Ruff

message: "Hard money" is in the lead but not explained or linked. Hard money gives four possible definitions. Which one applies here? 86.136.249.221 (talk) 19:41, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hard money? 
Talk:Critical geopolitics

message: Just wikified the Reader's Digest references. Thanks to Rcapelle for sorting the links from Gerard Toal's name, and for whichever eagle-eyed person noticed Iain Hay's name spelt wrongly. --Andrew.boulton 10:41, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: To a user seeking information on geopolitics with little previous knowledge might find this article hard to understand- such as me. What are some examples of geopolitics in use?
TheSanguineFable 00:29, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Examples
Talk:538

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) BilledMammal (talk) 01:59, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: *Comment: Also, back during the "User:Crouch, Swale/Year DAB" days, the users  had other suggestions for cases where there's no primary topic for a certain string of digits, so it might be worthwhile to check out some of those suggestions as well. Paintspot Infez (talk) 21:58, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

text: Relisting comment: Relisting for better consensus. Wikiexplorationandhelping (talk) 00:29, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 27 April 2024
Talk:List of meanings of countries' names

message: This page really is not necessary, it is just the same as List of country name etymologies, except with less information. Any information that does not feature on the aforementioned page should be added there, and this page should be deleted.
Lemmy Kilmister 10:55, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree this page is not neccesary, but also with the points of N-edits and KevinBullock; the term 'meanings' may be more accurate and comprehensive than simply 'etymologies', as to me the former is a broader term than the latter. And, yes, although this page has far fewer countries, there is information here that should be included in the other page. Thus I would vote a merger but with the name being 'List of meanings of countries' names, with the same format and (obviously) information as the etymology page. --Gregorof 07:18, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not necessary 

message: The real name of the United States is "United States of America", but you can to say that the US are "America". America is divided in North America, South America and the Caribean America,and the United States are only a north american country.
== While the name of the United States is not America ==  it is what the people of that country tend to call it.  Therefore it is a name of the country however not the official name.
:Not only do do the people who live there call it "America," the name is used worldwide as well. Lumaga 22:58, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The name of the United States is not "America" 

message: It says in the article under 'Columbia' that BC's name is derived from a river named Columbia. I had always understood that Queen Victoria chose the name British Columbia after the country Columbia, not the river. Was there confusion in the sentence, which is instead supposed to refer to the District of Columbia, not BC? It reads "the former", possibly this was supposed to say "the latter" --Gregorof 07:18, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  British Columbia 

message: Should I just start a new article for whats in the England section? Its a) interesting, and b) too long here. My only concern is that it seems like its just copied and pasted, and that it could be more encyclopedic. Comments please.
Also: Im tempted to go ahead and start merging content from this article with the etymologies one. That seemed to be a bit of a consensus. --Gregorof 22:04, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  England