Talk:Serbian mafia

message: this article has many bold statements that require citations and have not received them. Is the proper thing to do to delete the statements? wondering what others think here - dillon  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.247.234.73 (talk) 23:55, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: That movie was "ordered" by Bernard Kuschner to demonize Serbs. It's very well known who traded human organs. It were Albanians, Serbs were the victims. In that movie he made Serbs as the villains while others were their victims which of course, never happened in a real life
www.kosovoliberationarmy.com
https://www.google.rs/#q=albanians+human+organs
Throw this part out or I will have someone to do it. Stupid movies (which aren't based on truth to begin with) have no place on this article 178.221.179.226 (talk) 14:32, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Captifs part has no place in this article 

message: that part should be removed. The main character is not some girl who cuts her hair short and acts like a man and dresses like a man. Whoever put this is a fool.
The main character was born a man. It is a man, acts like a man and dresses like a man. he is a straight man who likes women he isnt a transvestite. 178.221.147.52 (talk) 14:27, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poslednji Krug u Monci tomboy part 

message: i wonder how a statement such as the following "Slobodan Milošević, the President of Serbia, protected the Mafia in exchange for political favors, thus having a direct connection to their activities." does not feature the "citation needed" label. anything is allowed when it's about a controversial politician and no wikipedia editor reacts?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sacdegemecs (talk • contribs) 22:04, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. FkpCascais (talk) 03:37, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  citations? 

message: ZnatNepo23892 (talk) 06:21, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Cannolis (talk) 07:55, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 19 January 2022 

message: https://balkaninsight.com/2021/12/06/cocaine-comrades-the-balkan-ties-of-a-fallen-colombian-drug-trafficker/ ZnatNepo23892 (talk) 22:06, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Serbian mafia 

message: https://balkaninsight.com/2011/04/01/serb-montenegrin-crime-gangs-the-most-powerful-in-europe/ ZnatNepo23892 (talk) 22:08, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Serbian mafia 

message: https://insightcrime.org/investigations/cocaine-criminal-steroid/ ZnatNepo23892 (talk) 22:10, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Serbian mafia 

message: https://www.rcrperu.com/carteles-mexicanos-serbios-e-italianos-abren-nuevas-rutas-de-exportacion-de-droga-desde-el-norte-del-peru/ ZnatNepo23892 (talk) 22:13, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 17:05, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Serbian mafia 

message: Unlocking semi-protection. Jkma31 (talk) 00:33, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unlock 

message: Unlocking semi-protection to add sourced contents. Jkma31 (talk) 00:35, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: requests for decreases to the page protection level should be directed to the protecting admin or to Wikipedia:Requests for page protection if the protecting admin is not active or has declined the request. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:44, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 18 May 2022 

message: I didnt evaide Block, because I was not long ago unblocked by administrator! . About 3 weeks ago! 86.58.41.217 (talk) 06:22, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Serbian mafia 

message: The History section is way too long. It comprises not history, but a list of headline news, mostly during a recent 10 year period. 
* Paragraph: On May 10 2010, ...
* Paragraph: On June 30 2010, ...
* Paragraph: On September 5 2010, ...
This kind of writing is unreadble, and it's not history. Suggest read books, crib from them. Book authors know how to distill information into readable historical prose. -- GreenC 03:09, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article needs help