Talk:Norwegian Army

message: A picture says "Norwegian tanks from the Second Batallion under the Norwegian Army in" but the vehicles in the pictures are not tanks but CV90 infantry fighting vehicles. The only tank in service with Norway is the Leopard 2. BTW where is the list of the inventory of the vehicles used by the Norwegian Army? I see the amount and types of ships and aircraft on the pages of the Navy and Air Force but on the page of the Army I see no list of the amount and types of armored vehicles.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.105.181.214 (talk) 12:34, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a tank! 

message: As this page from the Norwegian Army gives the name in English to be Royal Norwegian Army I propose a move to that name. Inge 13:32, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name 

message: Porting what I have written in the talk page for the Norwegian Defence Force. 
: Well, June month's issue of RAIDS, a French language military review, dedicates an article to Norway's military. Here are some scans, with translations, of the tables:
::Norwegian Army - according to the article, the 6th reserve brigade shall be dismantled under the Army 2008 reform plan. ISTAR stands for "Intelligence, Surveillance, Target Acquisition and Reconnaissance".
::Norwegian Air Force
::In both cases, sorry for the bad quality of images, but I am not really skilled in using skanners and Photoshop. There is also a table of the Navy, but it says that the near entirety of the Navy is regrouped at Bergen and that a Battalion of "Rangers" is under the Navy command. The Coast Guard is said to have 21 flotillas (based at Harstad and Haakonsvern) and a battalion of "Coastal Rangers". Russoswiss 01:34, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The Army's Logistic Education and Competence Centre (LOGUKS) at Sessvollmoen Camp is renamed "Forsvarets Kompetansesenter Logistikk (FKL)", which loosely translates into "Defence Centre of Logistic Competence". It is currently an independent, joint asset (common for all services), and should be considered to be deleted from the army-article alltoghether.--80.143.242.118 (talk) 19:46, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Units 

message: The AG-3 rifle is a battle rifle, not an assault rifle; it's 'full calibre', rather than the smaller 'intermediate calibre' required to designate it as an assault rifle.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.142.50.212 (talk) 23:37, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  AG-3 

message: There should be a picture of the insignia (the "S") of Student Officers too.
Daniel337 (talk) 20:02, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Student Officers 

message: After having looked over the article, I see a LOT of typos and outright wrong info in this article. For instance, that we've ordered 152 new Leopard 2s? That there's still 20 Leopard 1A5NOs in service? From what information the military's released, the Leo 2A5 was retired last year. The article should be given a full quality check to root out the mistakes and improve quality.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.202.54.63 (talk) 12:24, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typos 

message: The various special forcesof norway has been involved in many more operations than the ones mentioned. Both in afghanistan and Kosovo. Mortyman (talk) 22:51, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Norwegian specialforces engadgments

message: Is the Norwegian Army really the Royal Norwegian Army? -- Nidator T / C 11:58, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Not that I've heard, no. The Air Force and Navy are both Royal, but the Army I've never heard been called Royal. Both seem to be in use at the armed forces' website: , . It seems to me that the articles which leave out the Royal bit are most numerous. Also, the Norwegian government  leaves out the Royal. In fact, I couldn't find a single "Royal" Norwegian Army on regjeringen.no. I think the correct name for this article is simply "Norwegian Army". If there's no justified objections, then I'll move the article within a few days. Manxruler (talk) 19:22, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  As no counter-arguments were made in three days, the move back to the original name has been made. Manxruler (talk) 20:28, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Royal Norwegian Army? 

message: The link to Chief of staff Harald Sunde points to the wrong person.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.113.188.65 (talk) 21:54, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chief of staff 

message: I have added the Cold War to engadgments. Someone is proabably gonna say that this is'nt really a war. But Norwegian defence forces, special forces, navy, army, airforce and iteligence operatives were all involved in the Cold War, keeping an active eye on the Soviet Union and activities . Mortyman (talk) 18:23, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Cold War

message: OK, i know some militaristic individuals would love to have 220 000 strong army, but fro crying out loud Norwegian army has only 2 active brigades, therefore 10 000, 15000 personal at most. Could someone confirm this with Norwegian MOD, right now it looks ridiculous. 
As to 800 000 reserves, sorry that's just utter nonsense too, norm is 5% of the active male population, therefore reserves should be in the region of 4.8 million x 2.5% = 120 000, after all there are only 11 reserve brigades or home guards brigades, each brigade having 5000 men, you are looking at 55 000 strong reserves. I don't think Norway needs that large army, after all Russia is the only potential threat to Norway's security, but at least at this point relations between the two countries is relatively good, unless i am missing something.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.220.53.72 (talk) 15:59, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Size

message: It's simply the wrong enblem. Read this http://www.mil.no/fakta/start/om/#0
--Magnode (talk) 21:07, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Emblem

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations 
;What should I do?
	Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
A further notification will be placed when/if the image is deleted. This notification is provided by a Bot, currently under trial --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 11:03, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:KragJorgensen.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: aaah... just kidding....don't get so scared man..ur my people..lol  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.199.97.61 (talk) 18:21, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  boom bang  

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Norwegian Army. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071109120007/http://www.mil.no/start/article.jhtml?articleID=147513 to http://www.mil.no/start/article.jhtml?articleID=147513
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20020205115217/http://www.mil.no/haren/ to http://www.mil.no/haren
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:33, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Part of the text sounds like its written by Forsvarets Pressetjeneste as a recruitment brochure for HMKG:
Garde is a battalion with high standards in physical fitness, dependability, loyalty, independence, discipline, morale, sense of order, ability to lead themselves in uniform, and the ability to balance their complicated guard duty with relationship to the civilian environment. What can be read in the Norwegian press is something else: guardsmen hiding under their beds when an emergency alarm i sounded and guardsmen failing to qualify for foreign service.Creuzbourg (talk) 21:08, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Updated now.--Znuddel (talk) 20:34, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

text: Thanks. Creuzbourg (talk) 18:00, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  npov