Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/SynergeticMaggot

message: Can someone please point me to the right venue to dispute my checkuser? As I am a bit confused right now as why I am being suspected, and this is my first time (? not sure, I didn even know about this one!). Thanks. SynergeticMaggot 19:31, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You can do this here, or on my talk page. SynergeticMaggot 19:31, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Since Mackensen was rather cryptic in his original report, I have asked him to clarify it. He said he would look into it again.  Thatcher131 (talk) 19:48, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Ok, from what I see, this was an archived checkuser. No one has informed me of anything, and I deny this ridiculousness. I'm asking that it be removed from my RfA, there is enough against me already. I have asked 999 on his talk page if he'd send in his ip, or whatever is needed to clear me of this matter, as I will send in everything short of fluids (this is not meant to be taken as perversion, I mean samples of any kind. this is a serious matter). SynergeticMaggot 19:52, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Mackensen says you and 999 are unrelated to the other findings.  I removed the vote and your followup comment, on the grounds that leaving it in but struck out might be prejudicial even in light of the clarification.  I will also post a clarification on the RFCU page. Thatcher131 (talk) 20:06, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I requested the checkuser. Yes I am on Wikibreak but just learned this had become an issue. A particular AfD was flooded with meat and or sock puppets at the last minute. I requested a check user on SynergeticMaggot and the other experienced edits that were voting the same way the sockpuppets were voting. As I put in my request, probably all the other editors were innocent and one was guilty. SynergeticMaggot's name was on the ticket becuase someone's did. SynergeticMaggot was totally cleared. This should not be an issue in his RfA. There was some sock puppetry but nothing involving him.--A. B. 20:18, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I humbly thank you for taking time off of your wikibreak to come here. If there is anything within my powers that I can do, just ask. Thank you. SynergeticMaggot 20:21, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This was partly my fault, since I should have asked for clarification before posting to the RFA.  Sorry for the scare I put you through. Thatcher131 (talk) 20:48, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  My checkuser 

message: No need to apologize. Yet, I never refered to the minor vs. major edit conversation as correct per policy, but I did say  If so I will be more than happy to change it. HELP:Minor edit is not a policy, nor is it a guideline. And I nom-spammed? I asked current project participants to wiegh in on the proposal, seeing as how it was for a Barnstar for the WikiProject Stub sorting team. Also, there might have been a few edits I have done that might have been major edits, yet as I have said, I can change this per policy, because I always go with policy. And no one has refered this to me, nor a guideline, just Help:Minor edit, which says its a matter of opinion. SynergeticMaggot 20:10, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  User:FloNight 

message: I'm a bit confused here. Some of the comments that have been made here pertaining to my signature have left me uneasy. What's the big deal? Some dont like it, others find nothing wrong with it. Can someone give me a ruling on this? Also, some have made mention of my username. Whats wrong with it? I clearly describe its meaning on my page. Should I request a name change or something? SynergeticMaggot 23:59, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  My signature