Talk:INS Khukri (F149)

message: Complement of INS Khukri (and the Blackwood class frigates) is given as 112 men, but the casualties sustained during the sinking are 194 men (18+176), not counting the survivors. Is the complement information or casualty list simply wrong, or was the ship refitted to carry at least twice the crew of the original design? MKFI (talk) 16:06, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed , i checked it and found it to be incorrect. the complement was 150 (and not 112), casualty of 194 seems to be correct as its also mentioned in the Indian express news site. you can check the article now after my update. --ÐℬigXЯaɣ 16:25, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Complement of 112, casualties of 194? 

message: Corrected the Content of the article and provided citations for the same. I have given inline citations for the incidents as well. I have removed some ambiguous content. Sinking of Khukri did not start the indo pak war of 1971, the war was already in progress. Sinking of INS Khukhri did not meant victory of Pakistan Navy as the naval war continued until 16 Dec until the surrender of Pak Army and signing of the Surrender papers by Gen Niazi.
I have included more details about the incident and have mentioned it in my own words, as far as possible. Please discuss here if you disagree with any of my changes. --ÐℬigXЯaɣ 01:30, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  added source citation and associated content 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on INS Khukri (F149). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060710173052/http://www.acig.org:80/artman/publish/article_431.shtml to http://www.acig.org/artman/publish/article_431.shtml
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120118015853/http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/MONITOR/ISSUE4-3/harry.html to http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/MONITOR/ISSUE4-3/harry.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130425031811/http://cities.expressindia.com/fullstory.php?newsid=153894 to http://cities.expressindia.com/fullstory.php?newsid=153894
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:37, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on INS Khukri (F149). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120313093601/http://www.spsnavalforces.net/mn_mulla.asp to http://www.spsnavalforces.net/mn_mulla.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:58, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on INS Khukri (F149). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.zimbio.com/member/Pakistan1947/articles/4112973/Vice%20Admiral%20Tasneem
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120118015853/http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/MONITOR/ISSUE4-3/harry.html to http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/MONITOR/ISSUE4-3/harry.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:15, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The article on the ARA Belgrano claims that this was the first warship sunk in action by submarine since WW2. This article claims it is the first since the Korean War. These don’t contradict, but was there a ship that was sunk by submarine in the Korean War? I can only find a list of the five US warships sunk, but all of them struck mines. Did any other navy? Otherwise, would it be fair to assume the source for the other article is correct and edit this to ‘since the ‘Second World War’? Harsimaja (talk) 17:47, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I cannot  find any ship sunk by submarine in the Korean War, and there are reasonably thorough looking resources about US submarines roles.   All the best: Rich Farmbrough 18:04, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Since Korean War