lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:John Lederer

message: Apparently, John Lederer is the name of a member of the board of directors of Loblaw Companies Ltd..  Other than that, I know nothing about him.  However, it's not possible for him to be the same John Lederer featured in this article.  How should we differentiate the two men?  Do we need two separate entries (in which case more research obviously needs to be done), or would a simple blurb on this page about the new guy suffice?
Thanks. Cmdrwalrus 07:37, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tour de Langkawi

message: ===Lead section===
No suggestions
===History===
If necessary to expand the "History" section, see the "Tour de Langkawi" navigational box at the bottom of the article, which contains links to separate articles for each edition of the Tour.  In addition, Tour de Langkawi at cyclingnews.com contains a separate news report for each stage of recent Tour editions.
--LukasMatt (talk) 04:45, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Guild of Copy Editors cleanup

message: If necessary to expand the "History" section, see the "Tour de Langkawi" navigational box at the bottom of the article, which contains links to separate articles for each edition of the Tour.  In addition, Tour de Langkawi at cyclingnews.com contains a separate news report for each stage of recent Tour editions.
--LukasMatt (talk) 04:45, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: History
Talk:Treaty of La Pointe

message: Why does this table link the same thing like 20 times each, for instance "Mississippi Bands"? --NYMFan69-86 (talk) 18:38, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Because it is a sortable table (see the arrows at the top of each table column?). CJLippert (talk) 18:50, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The "signatures" table
Talk:Program 437

message: It appears user 69.136.32.171 has vandalized the page, adding the phrase, "all of the moronic individuals who believe wikipedia is accurate all of the time" in the first sentence of the last paragraph. I did remove the vandalism. --AnthonyA7 08:12, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it used to say "while", not "when". I've changed it back, and I think it makes more sense.  aa  v ^ 13:02, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Wisconsin Idea

message: A new editor has begun an edit war to add a new section to this article about the subject's relationship with public health. Unfortunately, it appears to be original research. As far as I can tell, the cited sources don't cite this subject and only the editor who wrote the material makes an explicit connection between the cited sources and this subject. ElKevbo (talk) 02:37, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  New section on relationship to public health 

message: I'm thinking the article should have a more chronological feel, as well as some information about how the Wisconsin Idea was dismantled in the modern era. There's a brief mention of Walker attempting to strip UW's mission statement, but that's just one part of a larger trend involving him and other politicians, trends, and economic factors. The article doesn't seem to, at present, make clear that the Wisconsin Idea is largely a thing of the past in Wisconsin. natemup (talk) 22:23, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi natemup, the wisconsin idea is not a thing of the past and is still a guiding philosophy at the University System. 65.204.38.226 (talk) 17:24, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  History section
Talk:Wisconsin tornado outbreak of 2005

message: Were there 23, 24, or 27?  The lead paragraph claims 27, the tornado summary claims 24, but the list only contains details for 23.  What's the deal?-RunningOnBrains 03:45, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Number of tornadoes

message: This is the same storm that spawned the outbreak in Ontario the next day as well as the Toronto Supercell. Considering that the latter outbreak doesn't merit an individual article and that both events were from the same system, shouldn't we merge both events together.JForget  18:12, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: August 19

message: I moved "Wisconsin Tornado Outbreak of August 2005" to "August 2005 Wisconsin tornado outbreak" to comply with IAW Wikipedia:Naming conventions (events). --Rosiestep (talk) 23:42, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: All tornadoes having "1737" and a 0/0.0 path length in the table need to be corrected.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.109.61.159 (talk) 23:19, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Times and Path Lengths 

message: This lists the tornado strengths in the old style Fujita scale which may not seem like a big difference but the the Enhanced Fujita scale does have slightly different parameters and is now the modern accepted tornado scale.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.242.231.221 (talk) 20:33, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Scale is outdated
Talk:Harold Lamb

message: Durandal (1981) 
The Sea of the Ravens (1983) 
Were these texts discovered long after his death?  They certainly LOOK like they've been posthumously published, since he died... long before.
Rycanada 08:29, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The author's website at http://www.haroldlamb.net/ is apparently defunct. Robert Hiller (talk) 06:05, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: External links

message: THE SARATOGIAN, WEDNESDAY, APRIL 11 , 1962 Saratoga Springs, New York
"DEATHS - Harold Albert Lamb, 69, of Beverly Hills, Calif., novelist and historian who chronicled the lives of such figures as Alexander the Great and Genghis Khan."
Hope this helps,
Darci (talk) 00:25, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re:  "until his death in 1962 in Rochester, N.Y." 

message: Lamb's book "Hannibal: One Man Against Rome (1958)," was one of my favorites.  However, I could have sworn he was also the author of a biography on Toussaint Louverture, and the independence of Haiti (St. Dominique). I was reading both at the same time.  Do you know if any such works?2602:302:D136:A040:C470:99E9:F705:5CE1 (talk) 19:53, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unlisted Work
Talk:Sony Sports Network

message: This article was proposed for deletion on 9 February 2006, 05:06 UTC. I removed the tag because I've heard of the name without being able to receive the channel, which should make it pretty notable. Sam Vimes 08:31, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Why was this article ever proposed for deletion? i dont get it. Snroy 13:06, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

text: Ten Sports is a very popular channel here in India. I can't believe it could be in AfD. —vedant (talk • contribs) 17:33, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "Channel brings to sports buffs a continuous dose of varied sports including WWE, US Open, ATP Tournaments, WTA, Ryder Cup, Moto GP, Euro league, PGA Championship,Asian Tour, European Tour and Tour De France. It also telecasts the world's best football action from the top leagues like the UEFA champions League, Spanish Super Cup, UEFA Super Cup, French League, Capital One Cup, German Cup along with major football club television programming thus promising the best in International Football." I find the tone of the article written like a press release or even a old-time radio commercial. Unfortunately, I don't know enough  about Indian media to say anything further. Can anyone help?V. Joe (talk) 13:27, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Article cleanup

message: This article could be famous channel or what so ever, I don't see any reliable sources supporting it. Danger^Mouse (talk) 12:38, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Honestly I don't find it notable
Talk:Tyler Burge

message: WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 16:58, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: I started this entry on Burge a few days ago.  Given that hundreds of other philosophers have Wiki entries, lack of an entry on Burge was a significant lacuna.  I wrote a discussion of Burge's view on anti-individualism.  I think other discussions are a good idea, in particular about de re belief and Burge's writings on epistemology.  Hopefully, these can be discussions of graduate-level quality.
--Rldoan 09:10, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  new entry on Burge 

message: I have placed a template at the header to reorganize the article according to the standard Wikipedia format, as some of the comments above allude to its non-Wikipedia formatting (Wikipedia:Manual of Style (layout) - Wikipedia:Manual of Style (layout)) ... Stevenmitchell (talk) 06:32, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia Format 

message: Why not just do that then Steven, rather than tag it as needing done? The philosophy of WIkipedia is, as I understand it, to become involved and edit where you see problems, not simply to highlight problems for others to come after you and sweep up. I realise that it is not just you, but others who do this. It leads to massive bloat in article content and a backlog of things needing done.
TonyClarke (talk) 23:30, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Why not just do that then?
Talk:Veda (company)

message: I can't make out the history. The article says "The Company was previously known as Baycorp Advantage, which was a merger of Australian company Data Advantage and New Zealand Company Baycorp." But I also read that Baycorp Advantage was previously "Credit Reference Association of Australia." --Chriswaterguy talk 16:50, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Credit Reference Association of Australia? 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.cardreport.com/international/australia.html. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  MER-C 08:39, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: https://www.equifax.com.au/rebrand
Not sure what is necessary to update this page correctly.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.203.126.218 (talk) 04:20, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Company Rebranded as Equifax
Talk:Undivided India

message: "Undivided India" is a currently used official legal term, references to the term Undivided India are found in legal enactments of the Republic of India, including its Citizenship Act 1955, which states that in the context of the Act "undivided India means India as defined in the Government of India Act 1935".
Please find references for this article and improve it.
Thanks
mrigthrishna (talk) 20:04, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That effectively means British Raj. So, I'm redirecting the article there. Wikipedia is also not a dictionary. --Ragib (talk) 20:05, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: An IP has reverted the merge,  i have changed back. Heard tried won (talk) 09:11, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: "Undivided India" is a currently used official legal [[term]]
Talk:Cabot, Bristol (former ward)

message: I want to link the Cabot page to the following category pages, since most of the entries are in fact in Cabot itself. However, I dont know how to do that without actually entering Cabot into the categories themselves! If anyone knows how to do it, go ahead!
Category:Buildings_and_structures_in_Bristol
Category:Culture_in_Bristol
Fig 09:20, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

message: I wonder if Bristol City Centre would not be a better title for this article. To the best of my understanding, Cabot is the name of a city ward rather than a recognised district name. It is basically the city centre (plus a bit) ward. In general UK local government wards are seen as too arbitrary and transient, and often insufficiently well known, to make good subjects for Wikipedia articles. IMHO it is preferrable to use well known district names, even if they don't have the sort of formal boundaries that wards do. However I'm not a Bristolian, so maybe I'm misunderstanding and Cabot is a well known local district name; if so please ignore this. -- User:chris_j_wood 19:24, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bristol City Centre 
Talk:TARGET (CAD software)

message: Hello Hydrargyrum,
I have cleaned up the TARGET 3001! entry. Unfortunately I am not a native english speaker, but I did my very best. I am new to wikipedia, and not that experienced like others. Is my work automatically recognized in respect to the the cleanup header? How can be made clear that an cleanup attempt already has been made?
Best regards,
Bubbles5
I have deleted the cleanup entry. --84.171.89.142 20:05, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: We are using Target since 6 years and we never had extraordinary problems. I have never read in forums about crashes. Spuzzdawg's personal experience may also come from an incorrect use. I remember one problem with a graphics card driver under Vista, but we got free service from IB Friedrich immediately. 93.230.124.164 (talk) 11:49, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Brotherhood of Shadow

message: The word "the" is not in the title of their clan. I would propose a move, but I'm not sure how to do it.  ---SilentRAGE! 06:12, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "the" 

message: Not sure if anyone is watching this page, but I'm am planning/preparing to move this article from its current name, Brotherhood of the Shadow, to its correct name, Brotherhood of Shadow. As pointed out by the above user, there is no "the" in the title of the clan, and I don't believe that a "the" was ever accidentally included during any mention of the clan's name. This correct name can be seen in Noob Smoke's Deception bio. However, it is also referred to as "Brothers of the Shadow" when it is first mentioned in Noob Saibot's Trilogy ending. MarphyBlack 21:48, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moving article 

message: It says Reiko is a member of the brotherhood, isn't this inaccurate? Reiko is one of Shao Kahn's henchmen, it should at the very least list him as a former member. BassxForte 22:25, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting point. Early released concept art of Reiko for Armageddon still showed the Brotherhood of Shadow logo on his attire, but this seems to have been removed in the final game. Additionally, Reiko's bio card states "he served for a time as a member of the Brotherhood of Shadow." I guess he did leave the clan at some point. Editing article now. MarphyBlack 23:10, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reiko
Talk:Resource (disambiguation)

message: I consider wrong to redirect the Business term Resourcing to page Resource_(disambiguation).
Page Resourcing has proven to have several visits pr day since it was created (see http://stats.grok.se/en/201001/resourcing).
The term Resourcing is used on 161 pages in Wikipedia (see http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22resourcing%22+site%3Aen.wikipedia.org), where in some cases in linked form like on page Management in line nr 2, explaining the essence of Management as "Resourcing encompasses the deployment and manipulation of..." ...resources.
Redirecting the Business term Resourcing to Resource_(disambiguation) leaves the term Resourcing unexplained on Wikipedia.
As a termporary resolve, i have here added information, all with internal links, about what Resourcing is.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by GardmanVS (talk • contribs) 17:06, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: A resource in a foraging context is a direct subset of natural resources, so I'm going to remove the expansion notice MadCow257 23:06, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct to redirect the Business term [[Resourcing]] to [[Resource_(disambiguation)]] ?
Talk:Fardeen Khan

message: I HAVE FOUND SOME INTERESTING NEWS ABOUT SALMAN KHAN , SAIF ALI KHAN , SHAHRUKH KHAN, AAMIR KHANAND FARDEEN KHAN THE INFORMATION IS VERY IMPORTANT FOR EVERYONE SO PLEASE ADD THE INFO FOR ALL THE 5 KHANS ITS REALLY VERY IMPORTANT AND I AM NOT LYING HERE IS THE LINK FOR THE NEWS WHO IS THE REAL BADSHAH OF BOLLYWOOD      A R Ansari September 7 2008. (UTC).
: Its a personal blog, not a reliable source. --Neelkamala (talk) 03:06, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  IMPORTANT INFORMATION FOR YOU GUYS 
Talk:Screen Awards

message: Suggest that all those per-category award winners articles be moved into main article, or at least combined into one winners article. Fleebo (talk) 02:55, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled

message: The page has been recently moved to Color Screen Awards instead of the regular Star Screen Awards. I think such a move must be discussed first as for years now the page has been known as "Star Screen" and the change must be agreed upon.
I think the sponsor is not important here - the organisation is. Just like with Filmfare, we do not go with idea Filmfare Awards or other such sponsors who have been associated with them over the years. These awards, btw, have had different titles because of the same, including "Screen Weekly Awards", "Screen Videocon Awards", "Star Screen", and now "Colors Screen". So, ultimately, my suggestion is to change it to simply "Screen Awards".
Your take? Shahid • Talk2me 15:20, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Totally agree with Shahid, the page URL, Heading and everything should be hereafter referred as simply "Screen Awards" along with all other related pages. As of now it looks very confusing. Someone please do the necessary changes. Or shall I go ahead and do it.--Msrag (talk) 06:28, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move 

message: * 1998 ceremony --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 09:20, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Hotel George Washington (Jacksonville)

message: The article is well-written, nice job someone!  The article finishes now with "Currently, the site is occupied by the new federal court building in downtown Jacksonville."   I think that refers to the new Bryan Simpson United States Courthouse but that seems to be in the next block.  I am not familiar with the ground, but looking at Google maps it seems the Hotel George Washington location, if it is one of the corners of Julia and Adams streets, cannot be the location of that courthouse.  Any which way, identifying the coordinates of the Hotel George Washington would also be a small improvement to this article. --doncram (talk) 02:40, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: location and subsequent use
Talk:Great capes

message: I don't think Cape Agulhas belongs here ? It is the most southerly, but it is certainly not the same as the Cape of Good Hope. Wizzy…☎ 09:54, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it's not the same, but it is occasionally cited as one of the Great Capes, in place of Good Hope.  Good Hope is the traditional African milestone on the clipper route, but Agulhas being the southernmost point, as well as arguably the most hazardous point, some authors/sailors prefer to treat Agulhas as the milestone instead.  It makes little difference in practice, in terms of modern high-speed circumnavigations, as they're so close together.  I'll try to clarify this. — Johan the Ghost seance 11:31, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

text: Sorry, my bad.  I'll fix the map when I get a chance -- probably not soon, as I'm travelling. — Johan the Ghost seance 23:56, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: early comments

message: What a deliciously fitting quote.  – SJ + 08:10, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poetic 

message: Hi. I propose to correct the name "South West Cape" New Zealand  to "South Cape". Please see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:South_West_Cape_(New_Zealand)#Name  for the reasons/details. Thanks LawrieM (talk) 04:18, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  South West Cape vs South Cape ( New Zealand)
Talk:Oe (Cyrillic)

message: I don't know if it's just me but this character appears as an O with two dots over it in the title bar of IE and the top-level heading of the page.  In the first sentence, the bold part looks like an O with a bar over it, then in brackets the character is shown with the bar through the middle (looking more like greek theta).  Which is it?  Muntfish 10:01, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Appearance of this character in IE6 

message: If this letter is called “Ö (Cyrillic)”, how to name Ӧ (CYRILLIC CAPITAL LETTER O WITH DIAERESIS) ? --Hello World! 14:50, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: naming
Talk:Mahendran (filmmaker)

message: Mahendran had two wives. Premi was his second wife. Please add. 2.49.112.190 (talk) 07:24, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Family
Talk:Dimitri Voudouris

message: * When i got to this article, the subject's e-mail address was included at the bottom. for this reason i believe it to be vanity, and for this reason i believe the subject to be non-notable. Jdcooper 10:17, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Vanity
Talk:Battle of Festubert

message: A Canadian division was mentioned in the article. Which one was it? --Patar knight - chat/contributions 12:19, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: 1st Canadian Division - 2nd Division was only just forming, so I believe this was simply referred to as "the Canadian Division" at the time. Shimgray | talk | 11:43, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canadian Divison 

message: DoneKeith-264 (talk) 14:37, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't forget Second Action of Givenchy, 15–16 June and First Attack on Bellewaarde, 16 June.Keith-264 (talk) 21:24, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citiations
Talk:Gianduja

message: :Correct spelling is Gianduja (with J), as we can see in the italian Wikipedia and as it is spelled within this article. Gianduia (with i) is the common spelling for that wonderful hazelnut stuff. Should we move? --Adornix 00:20, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops: I just found the redirect from Gianduja. Should be the other way, I think. --Adornix 00:22, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy of [[Talk:Gianduia]]