lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:How We Quit the Forest

message: I am changing How We Quit the Forest notability to "High" on the importance scale. Like its predecessor Thanks for the Ether, Forest is one of the pioneering, definitive and influential examples of the underground genre Cello Rock, thus satisfying Wikipedia's criteria of historical and cultural notability, despite it never charting, never selling in high numbers and being mostly known only to the band's core fan base. In this genre, however, the record is considered a modern classic. 
-Red marquis (talk) 04:59, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Boogadaboogadaboogada!

message: I have reformatted this article, but the information still needs verification, specially the dates in the infobox. JoaoRicardo 05:59, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Érik Comas

message: There are three French communes called "Romans" listed on the Romans disambig page.  Which was he born in? —Simetrical (talk) 06:01, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Romans
Talk:Rookery

message: sea lions stay in rookeries and have their kids and mate. they are pretty safe in these rookeries, no predator can reach them, unless little young cubs run into the ocean and killer whales eat them. 65.74.74.181 06:02, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have found no info on the web about this. I think it is someone's fantasy SuzanneKn 16:55, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lostan's River by Cynthia DeFelice

message: I turned to this article as I hoped to find something about rookeries in the english countryside, stereotypically near an old vicarage, but zilch about them. I'm sure they must have been studied in depth by naturalists and biologists. As there are not many of them, and as I think they do not move about, then it would be possible to have a list of them. Similarly with other bird colonies.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.2.205.177 (talk) 12:50, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think a list would be hard to compile - I know of at least five within ten miles of my house (South Norfolk). But there is a certain lack of detail with regard to the use of the term for its original purpose.--Woodgreener (talk) 20:06, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rookeries in the english countryside 

message: Crows are solitary birds, and do not nest in colonies. This is a common misconception, at least in the UK, when people see a group of black birds flying or nesting, they presume they are crows, but they are nearly always rooks. My point being crows do not nest in rookeries, contrary to the first paragraph of the article. Thoughts? --Woodgreener (talk) 20:02, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crow reference??
Category talk:Formal methods

message: I'm making the specification languages category a subcategory of this, rather than the other way around as it was. If someone has a good reason to switch it back feel free to explain and do so. Thanks. Leland McInnes 06:07, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

message: Formal methods has much narrower meaning than the name alone would suggest. See also the ACM classification where formal methods are a mere level-4 leaf in D.2.4 Software/Program Verification. On this wiki anything remotely formal, like lambda calculus is categorized that way. Pcap ping 14:25, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  A lot of articles are wrongly categorized in this cat
Talk:Sua sponte

message: The term """suo motu""" is a very frequently used term in Pakistan and India. There it specifically refers to cases taken up the higher judiciary, the Supreme Court and Provincial High Courts (equivalent to a state supreme court), on their own accord (i.e.: without a formal complaint from any petitioner). This article needs to have a section on the usage in each country. I just added a sentence about its usage in Pakistan, because till a few minutes ago, the article mentioned nothing about this topic. Kas1234567 (talk) 05:35, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Usage in Pakistan and India 

message: I have made comments concerning the use of the closely related Sua sponte and Motu proprio. It may be that the terms would be better dealt with under one title than split. Otr500 (talk) 06:04, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sua sponte v. Motu proprio
Talk:40 Greatest Players in PBA History

message: Everyone is encouraged to improve this article Circa 1900 06:35, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:DK-King of Swing

message: DK:King of Swing redirects to a nonexistent page called king of swing on the German Wikipedia. Why is that? —↑Darklinkskywalker|Talk_|i did this stuff_↓ 00:10, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Erm

message: How about changing the name of the article to DK King of Swing? Cipher (Yell) 19:43, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name Change
Category talk:Wikipedia help

message: The number of pages here makes this category unfortunately rather confusing.  They need to be sorted into sensible subcategories. -- Beland 06:59, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hi everyone. I've just created a new category, :Category:Wikipedia formatting, and put the article Wikipedia:Typography. if you feel this category is superfluous, or is duplicated elsewhere, you can feel free to let me know. it just seemed like a category that we might need here. please feel free to comment. thanks, all!! cheers!! --Sm8900 (talk) 15:25, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  new category created
Talk:River Coquet

message: pronunciation unclear - anybody know?
:It's pronounced more in the English way than the French way - unsure of how to write in IPA, but is something like "Kohk-ut" AndrewMcQ 11:56, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: A drainage area that "does not exceed 240 square metres" seems low for a river of some 40 miles length. Am I misunderstanding the term, or does this need correction / clarification?
J mcquillen (talk) 19:39, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed; it seems too low by some orders of magnitude. I've removed it. Let someone who knows re-instate the corrected information with a reliable source. Feline Hymnic (talk) 21:44, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Drainage Area 

message: I have assessed the article against the following criteria for B-class:
* Suitably referenced, with inline citations
* Reasonable coverage - no obvious omissions or inaccuracies
* Defined structure, with adequate lead
* Reasonably well written for grammar and flow
* Supporting materials - Infobox, map, images
* Appropriately understandable
Since it meets these, I am rating it as B-class. Bob1960evens (talk) 08:52, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: The length given in the article had previously been unreferenced. The entire river is an SSSI and a new figure is provided based upon the citation provided by Natural England - for information; the ref says '90km (57 miles)' though 90km actually converts to 56 miles so the latter figure differs slightly from the referenced figure.Geopersona (talk) 06:45, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  River length
Talk:Circuit board

message: Shouldn't this page redirect to printed circuit board rather than circuit design?  The former is what I was looking for when I typed "circuit board" in the search field.  The difference between a concrete object and a (sometimes abstract) process is not a subtle one.  "Board" refers to an object.  Since this page originally redirected to printed circuit board, I am restoring the original.  --Wechselstrom 07:02, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Can this also mean breadboard? Arbitrarily0 (talk) 22:44, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Civil Service Reform Act of 1978

message: ekh 03:00, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

message: This is a vital government Act. It was the first instance of federal whistleblowr protection. Someone knowledgeable please expand this article!
Fmanheim (talk) 06:29, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: That section was un-saveable: badly written, political POV, badly-sourced, illiterate, and generally wrong. Please don't revert, and don't consult it in rewriting. The rest of the article isn't at all good, either, so more bold cuts with or without replacement would be a good idea. Enon (talk) 12:15, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Significance section deleted
Talk:Harishchandra

message: As both the articles are about the same person, I have proposed this merge. I propose to retain Harishchandra as this is a more common name, especially in the Indian context. It returns 63,000 hits on Google to 35,000 hits of the other spelling. I'd wait for comments till 18th of december 2005 before merging. --Gurubrahma 07:20, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merge with [[Harischandra]]

message: Where did taramati and harishchandra 103.134.158.120 (talk) 19:20, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The promise of promise
Talk:Impulse Airlines

message: I think this should be Low or Medium on the importance rating. Any comments?--Rob 07:15, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Importance Rating

message: Thanks Ardfern for tidying this article up a bit. I have changed the wikilink to J41s back to BAe Jetstream 41 from Handley Page Jetstream because they are two separate articles. The former deals specifically with the J41 whereas the latter deals with earlier versions of the Jetstream. The type acquired by Impulse was the J41. 
Also, could you please take another look at the part that says: 
:"The airline was acquired by Qantas in November 2001, forming part of the QantasLink group of subsidiary airlines. It ceased operations on 24 May 2004 and in May 2005 its operations were integrated into the QantasLink network." 
I'm sure these dates aren't right. This suggests that the airline didn't fly at all between May 2004 and May 2005 but that it re-commenced operations in May 2005. I'm confused because I'm sure that Impulse was flying as Jetstar in 2004. I'm not sure what this section should say. Thanks. -- Adz 07:23, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  J41
Talk:United Religions Initiative

message: Sfuqua 07:33, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Contributions to Interreligious relations welcome Jackiespeel 16:31, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: *This article currently cites no third party sources. Lacking such sources it cannot establish notability. Further, it gives no indication (let alone reliably sourced indication) of prominent or large-scale membership that would add to this organisation's stature.
*"direct correspondence with URI" is not verifiable, and is thus not a WP:RS.
HrafnTalkStalk 05:13, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sourcing and notability 

message: The CSM piece on California Interfaith Power & Light appears to make no mention of the URI. HrafnTalkStalk(P) 07:22, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Then you need a WP:RS stating that "the group is a member of the URI" -- as it stands, this "example" is undocumented. HrafnTalkStalk(P) 18:17, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  California Interfaith Power & Light 

message: I draw editors attention to:
*WP:MOSLINKS#Link titles
*WP:MOSBIO#Honorific titles
HrafnTalkStalk(P) 07:28, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: (i) I was meaning the repeated insertion of titled-links for the regions. (ii) 'Formal clerical titles' (along with formal academic titles, formal nobility titles, etc, etc) are "honorific titles". Please do not use them.  HrafnTalkStalk(P) 18:10, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  MOS Issues
Talk:List of Washington (state) ballot measures

message: This list only covers initiatives to the people and does not cover initiatives to the legislature, which also started their numbering at 1 and are now at around 340. Should another list be created for initiatives to the legislature? It seems like it might be a little cumbersome and confusing to add all the initiatives to the legistlature to this list. --Lukobe 07:34, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I think it should be a separate article. For example, Affirmative action links here for I-200, and it is very confusing. -- Jmabel | Talk 22:52, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Should we move the current one to List of Washington initiatives to the people and make List of Washington initiatives a disambiguation page? --Lukobe 22:56, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

text: If there's no objection, I'll do it if/when I have time. --Lukobe 06:53, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Done --Lukobe 06:54, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm currently in the process of reformatting every listing into a table, adding a source for each, and adding YES/NO votes. Afterwards, I'll work on linking as many of these as I can to their respective articles, and will most likely create pages for some of the more important ones. ThadeusOfNazerethTalk to Me! 08:46, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Update 2 - Wow. I completely forgot about this. I'm currently working on a major translation process, but I will be getting back around to this next. Shouldn't be more than one more days work! ThadeusOfNazerethTalk to Me! 06:41, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I severely overestimated how mindnumbingly boring updating this article would be. I plan on continuing, but it's not taking priority for me at the moment. ThadeusOfNazerethTalk to Me! 03:34, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update on major reconstruction 

message: Should we be listing advisory votes here as well? They're on the ballot and are voted on, but AFAIK don't actually have any legally binding impact. I don't have a problem with adding them, it'll just be repetitive since they're all some variation of "Should we have a new tax in X amount". Tagging @SounderBruce and @Reywas92 as editors who helped get this to FL status. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/they)Talk to Me! 18:56, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: No, I don't think they're necessary since they're entirely non-binding, would just be clutter. Reywas92Talk 20:50, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advisory Votes
Talk:Brian Chase (Wikipedia prankster)

message: How do you know he was born in 1967? Tfine80 07:43, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Rush Delivery, Chase's employer. Gamaliel 10:13, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth date 

message: Please replace existing source in its entirety with the following:
#REDIRECT Wikipedia Seigenthaler biography incident


Reasons: (1) to fix double redirect caused by target page move; (2) to include R templates. Thanks.  
– Wdchk (talk) 04:06, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Done — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 04:56, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 6 February 2014
Talk:Blazing Skull

message: I removed the part "the actual Blazing Skull appeared in Quasar #46 (May 1993) of as part of the group Shock Troop" because that Blazing Skull is a completley different character also known as Skull the Slayer. - (193.11.14.94 13:32, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: As far as the origin story in this article goes, Blazing Skull's powers appear to be a result of being trained by a little-known tribe of people with such abilities. As such, he is not a mutate. I will delete this category; if anyone has data to the contrary, please cite it and replace the category. Rosencomet (talk) 18:12, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Powers 
Talk:Destroyer (Thor)

message: I'm not sure how this image is somehow superior.  If it can't be the one that I put up, I'd prefer the original image - the cover of the Destroyer's first appearance.  Biff Loman 11:16, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Image 

message: In the lead it states that the Destroyer was created by Odin. However in the biography, it states that the Destroyer was created by all the Skyfather gods. Which is it? Grey Shadow | Talk 12:30, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Creators 

message: In the Marvel Movies Wiki, the Destroyer's appearance box names Thor (2011) and The Avengers (2012). I wouldn't object to this statement as the contributors go in for their topic. --Hodsha (talk) 19:31, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It's still a trivial non-appearance as the character does not appear in the film, and something like that is certainly not lead-worthy. 207.229.139.154 (talk) 04:21, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Movie appearance
Talk:Vance Astrovik

message: This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject.  If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class.  The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject.  Comics-awb (talk) 17:54, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Comics B-Class Assesment required

message: As this B-Class article has yet to receive a review, it has been rated as C-Class. If you disagree and would like to request an assesment, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment and list the article. Hiding T  14:42, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: C-Class rated for Comics Project
Talk:Like Mike

message: I've marked this page as needing to be cleaned up; I'd do it myself, but I'm a bit sick at the moment, so I'm not up to the task, nor have I seen the movie.  Mainly what needs to be edited is the grammar and Wikicode, which is a bit of a mess.--Jess 08:07, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Nardulli22 01:06, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cast Article Sloppy 
Talk:Wonder Man (DC Comics)

message: What happened to Eisner's version, that had DC suing?  Trekphiler 
11:19, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That is Wonder Man (Fox Publications) Roygbiv666 (talk) 16:32, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remembering Simon 

message: Can we get a citation on this? I'm no where near even a wannabe expert on Superman... but it just seems to me that one of the many things Superman is impervious to would be self pity. Still, the article isn't citing any sources for any of the specific statements that it makes.24.254.163.150 (talk) 09:42, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Superman feeling like a has been?
Talk:List of WCW World Television Champions

message: Could someone upload a wrestler with the belt?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Justakija (talk • contribs) 13:46, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: There are license issues to contend too. Easy said than done.--WillC 17:53, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: Crockett had no connection to GCW. His territory was Mid-Atlantic (Carolinas & Virginia), not Georgia. I don't know the best way to re-write the intro but the GCW part absolutely has to go. PeteF3 (talk) 18:46, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: This has been done. Not sure also why the list article intro is longer than the intro on the main page for the title, but that's another edit for another time. NWAjr. (talk) 00:40, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Georgia Championship Wrestling' 
Talk:List of New Hampshire historical markers (1–25)

message: Per WP:NC and WP:MOS List of New Hampshire Historical Markers: 1-25 (hyphen), etc., should all be at List of New Hampshire Historical Markers: 1–25 (en-dash) with redirects to them from the hyphen versions. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont]  ‹(-¿-)› 23:11, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup list article names
Talk:Mihajlo Pupin

message: Mihajlo Pupin had a brother knowns as Vladimir Pupin,(later Victor Pupins). 
Victor was forced to join the Nazi's or he'd be shot, he reluctantly joined, and was sent to fight, he got captured and became a prisoner of war after the 2 world war was over, he got an English citizen ship and then met
a English women and fell in love, got married and had three sons, David, Peter and (blank), Peter is an ex formula 1 engineer and pit stop crew member and also my (grandfather)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Creative castaway (talk • contribs) 12:24, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Family 

message: Should he be called Serbian-American or just Serbian? FMSky (talk) 20:49, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nationality 

message: One story sais, that in order to enroll studies he had to write down that he is 4 years younger. 212.200.181.86 (talk) 18:08, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of birth 

message: In the personal life section those two numbers don’t seem to stack up. Married for 8 years, from 1888 and daughter born in 1899. What’s missing? Pozdrav, DiscoverYellow (talk) 02:16, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Years of marriage vis a vis child birth year
Talk:Wagenya

message: Thank you "Theneokid" for your hints about editing Wikipedia.  I'm new in this and I have a lot of respect for the work carried out in this massive collection of "firsthand" information. Thank you Tornasole 08:57, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wagenya 

message: Italic text
Dear browsers of Wikipedia, this article was written and documented with pictures by myself, as I'm living here in the Democratic Republic of Congo.  If someone is doubting about its reliability, please fell free to drop a note requesting assistance.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tornasole (talk • contribs) 06:35, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source of this Wagenya article
Talk:Himeji

message: I decided I would start up the discussion page for Himeji. I've just (finally!) joined Wikipedia as a contributing member and I'm also a resident of Himeji, so I expect I'll be contributing what I can when I have time. Threat42 04:57, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion Page 

message: I modeled the Sister city section after the Osaka page model in hopes of keeping all the Japanese-related articles looking consistent. I hope this is the proper protocol. Threat42 04:57, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sister Cities and Castle 

message: What are those islands that are shown to be under the city's jurisdiction on the map? They should at least be mentioned by name.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.157.155.247 (talk) 11:48, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Islands
Talk:Katsushika

message: Regarding places: I don't have a source for things like "machi" or "cho"; if anyone can help, please do. Fg2 09:23, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

message: A user replaced the first kanji with . This doesn't match the typeface of the second kanji in boldness or baseline (here it is paired with the second kanji 飾 and for comparison here are the two kanji in the default font 葛飾) and furthermore, it stays the same size when the browser's type size is changed. So I replaced it with the default font. Fg2 01:46, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The kanji in Katsushika

message: Why is Kasai Seaside Aquarium on this page. It's not in Katsushika-ku.
Which idiot put it in here? 
The dumbell seems to be : 10:21, 1 July 2012‎ 122.209.149.138
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Still polaris (talk • contribs) 05:30, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kasai Seaside Aquarium 
Talk:Video Privacy Protection Act

message: The PATRIOT act, as enforced, renders the VPPA moot.  Not that this article should be removed, but that an expansion of the stub should take into account the clearly-related impact of the PATRIOT act.
drone5 09:38, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: If passed, HR6671 will change this bill to clarify that "a video tape service provider may obtain a consumer’s informed, written consent on an ongoing basis and that consent may be obtained through the Internet."
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/hr6671
Mentiro (talk) 17:00, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: HR6671 will change this