Talk:Newhaven

message: This page is very bare indeed.  I have added a little on serious local interest areas such as Tide Mills, the Seaplane Base, and the Heritage Marice Hospital, but the page needs taming and tidying, plus a lot more references and some decent pictures.
Fiddle Faddle 21:14, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: In accordance with  the Wikipedia notes on writing about settlements, one of the recommendations is that, in order to reduce the number of stubs, villages and other settlements (and in this case, other things) within the place should be in one article. Hence the proposals. 
I am now setting about a complete rewrite of this article, using the recommendations, so would be glad of time to do so before further comments are made!
Peter Shearan (talk) 13:28, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposals

message: # Support - probably with the exception of Newhaven Incinerator Blackwave...... (talk) 19:43, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Agree

message: As part of my Sussex merge purge, I have removed some of the merge tags here. The Marconi stub already redirected to a Marconi article. The incinerator and seaplane I now think should be left as their own article. As Fiddle Faddle said above, they need work, but there is better scope left on their own. The Maritime museum article is a one-liner and I will merge that in due course. ++ MortimerCat (talk) 20:50, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Proposals again. 

message: I discovered Tide Mills is actually in the parish of Seaford, therefore technically its mention should be moved to Seaford, East Sussex. I left it behind just in case it has a greater association with Newhaven, which means it probably should stay. Maybe a local can comment. MortimerCat (talk) 11:07, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tide Mills 

message: *Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.[?]
*This article has no or few images. Please see if there are any free use images that fall under the Wikipedia:Image use policy and fit under one of the Wikipedia:Image copyright tags that can be uploaded. To upload images on Wikipedia, go to Special:Upload; to upload non-fair use images on the Wikimedia Commons, go to commons:special:upload.[?]
*You may wish to consider adding an appropriate infobox for this article, if one exists relating to the topic of the article. [?] (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
*As per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), dates shouldn't use th; for example, instead of (if such appeared in the article) using January 30th was a great day, use January 30 was a great day.[?]
*As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space in between. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2][?]
*The article will need references. See WP:CITE and WP:V for more information.[?]
*Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.[?]
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Regards, FM [ talk to me | show contributions ]  14:13, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Automated Peer Review 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Newhaven, East Sussex. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100304131811/http://www.newhavenfort.org.uk/history.htm to http://www.newhavenfort.org.uk/history.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140130022318/http://www.seriousfox.co.uk/work/easyart to http://www.seriousfox.co.uk/work/easyart
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081015172840/http://www.newhaven-regeneration.org/newhaven.htm to http://www.newhaven-regeneration.org/newhaven.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080524212906/http://www.sussexbythecoast.biz/Sussex-Towns-Directory/Newhaven--East-Sussex/524/0.htm to http://www.sussexbythecoast.biz/Sussex-Towns-Directory/Newhaven--East-Sussex/524/0.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070907191702/http://www.newhaventowncouncil.gov.uk/Newhaven-History.php to http://www.newhaventowncouncil.gov.uk/Newhaven-History.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:58, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Newhaven, East Sussex. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061004034125/http://ncinewhaven.org.uk/ to http://www.ncinewhaven.org.uk/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:20, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018) 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. Per consensus, WP:SMALLDETAILS applies.  – robertsky (talk) 14:09, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Newhaven, East Sussex →  – most popular city with the exact name (not the New Haven in Connecticut JuniperChill (talk) 22:05, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 6 March 2024