lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hermanafrid

message: Ok, so on this page for Hermanafrid, in states: "His siblings were Baderic; Radegund (the elder), married to the Lombard king Wacho; and Bertachar."  4 siblings.
Then, later on, it says, "He first shared the rule with his brothers Baderic and Bertachar, but later killed Bertachar in a battle in 529, leaving the young Radegund an orphan."
So, I see that Radegund must have the same name as the Radegund (the elder), a sibling to Hermanafrid.  So this Radegund must not be the sibling, and in fact a niece, as it implies that her father was Bertachar.
However, on Radegund's page, it states "Radegund was born to King Berthar, one of the three kings of Thuringia (a kingdom located in present day Germany), c 520.  Radegund's uncle, Hermanfrid, killed Berthar in battle, orphaning her."
So which is right?  There is no Berthar mentioned as a sibling in Hermanafrid's article.  And it also states Hermanafrid killed Bertachar, and implies he's the father of Radegund.  From Bertachar's article, it appears he's also known as Berthar, but that's not mentioned on either of these pages.  If, in fact, it is the same person with two different names, the two articles should be cleaned up to clarify this.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.211.0.21 (talk) 22:39, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion....
Talk:Litchfield Historic District

message: Notes on HABS pics available:
South Street
*Ozias Seymour Homestead, South Street, Litchfield, Litchfield County, CT, ct0363, 1 pic
*Gerret P. Welch House, Litchfield, Litchfield County, CT, ct0361, 1 pic by William Rainey
*Law School, South Street, Litchfield, Litchfield County, CT, 1 pic, ct0360
*Major David Welch House, Litchfield, Litchfield County, CT, 1 pic, ct0362
East Street
*Phelps' Tavern, East Street, Litchfield, Litchfield County, CT, ct0164, 2 pics, 4 data pages
Street not identified
*Elisha Sheldon House, Litchfield, Litchfield County, CT, ct0163, 2 pics by Stanley Mixon in 1940
North Street
Above notes in progress from searching at HABS/HAER search site on "Litchfield CT". --doncram (talk) 15:39, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  HABS notes 

message: One or two times, the article has been edited erroneously to remove mention of East Street houses included in the district.  See map clearly showing National Historic Landmark District boundaries, on last page (page 72), of 1978 NRHP document authored by Ransom.  The fact that East Street slopes down from the center of the village--rather steeply, in fact--is a fact known from walking the district and does not need specific sourcing unless challenged (but why would someone challenge that?).  If anyone doubts, call the local public library which provides walking tour maps and has expertise about the history ... and boundaries....and geography. --doncram 22:44, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: East Street portion of district
Talk:L. A. Dunton (schooner)

message: There are two (underwhelming) photos available through Attribution/Share Alike on flickr, here and here. I've been meaning to upload one or both for months, but perhaps that's best left to someone who hates uploading photos a little less passionately than me. --Fullobeans (talk) 04:55, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Photos
Talk:Linda Hazzard

message: Fasting may protect against disease; some say it may even be good for the brain Washington Post December 31, 2012; "In 1908, Linda Hazzard, ... was jailed after one of her patients died of starvation. But what if she was, at least partly, right?". Reference for article improvement. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 13:37, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Maybe she was not wrong
Talk:Gardening for the Million

message: I added this article because this book is surely notable, even though I cannot find the references myself. We actually have a completed Wikiproject that created an article or a redirect fro every one of the 1252 entries in this book. The book went through at leas 19 editions.
Can someone who is competent in this area please add some references? -Arch dude 22:17, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Justification
Talk:Amateur rocketry

message: New section called Propellant.  Here experimental propellants based on APCP, along with "sugar" motors and hybrid motors Rocketmaniac 22:44, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion needed 

message: Another good Amateur Rocketry link would be;
* Richard Nakka's Experimental Rocketry Site Rocketmaniac 00:21, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links 
Talk:Renée and Renato

message: Just read an article in The Sun newspaper (01-Aug-09) about Renato's death. They list him as 69 years old at his death, that Renee's real name was Maureen and that he was always being confused for the Cornetto advert singer. Can anyone clear up these facts? 79.77.153.233 (talk) 08:24, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm sure I saw Ron Atkinson's episode quite recently, and Renato did appear, supposedly to the surprise of Atkinson. 94.3.144.194 (talk) 00:11, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Room 101
Talk:Chris Pazan

message: Wikipedia please do not delete the Chris Pazan page. I'm tryiing to develop the page but I'm still trying to figure out Wikipedia and gathering info about Chris.
Thank You,
Illinirj
No sweat.  Answered on your talk page.  --PMDrive1061 22:51, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion
Talk:Battle of Khotyn (1673)

message: Why is the hyperlink for ref #4 an online gambling location?    — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.110.0.36 (talk) 14:56, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: See  and User talk:128.29.43.2.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  22:26, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anon's copyvio contrib 
Talk:List of diplomatic missions in Taiwan

message: There is now a discussion at WP:FOR on the formatting and content of "List of diplomatic missions" articles. As this discussion ostensibly could affect this article, editors are encouraged to provide their opinions on the WP:FOR at this link - Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_International_relations#Formatting_of_diplomatic_missions_lists - please do not discuss on this article talk page as valid points for consideration may very well not be seen by editors at large. Thank you, --Russavia Dialogue Stalk me 22:48, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion at WP:FOR on formatting and content of "List of diplomatic missions" article 

message: There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Conscription in the Republic of China - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 18:20, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: Diplomatic missions explicitly excludes representative offices from definition of diplomatic missions. I corrected the article accordingly.
Consequently, the article should be further edited with this in mind and renamed to, for example, "List of diplomatic missions and representative offices in Taiwan".88.26.202.156 (talk) 16:08, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia does not consider representative offices as diplomatic missions
Talk:The Skeptic (British magazine)

message: I think 7 screens listing all the past issues is a bit much. Richard001 (talk) 06:42, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Article format/contents

message: "Previous Volumes" is a word-for-word copy of information available at the website, and an unnecessary list at a website where such lists are frowned upon.  This from a fan of The Skeptic.  Cluebot automatically reverts, if anyone wants to go ahead and fix this.  67.164.44.216 (talk) 23:56, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Agreed. 

message: I note that the entire (and very large) advisory board seems to be listed, including a number of presumably non-notable individuals (no wiki article).  Is this useful to the reader?  What about paring it down somewhat, to a "List of notable people on the Editorial Advisory Board"?  Plazak (talk) 16:17, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editorial Advisory Board 

message: I will add info from a source, so I copied this WP to my sandbox to start working on it. Joao1975 (talk) 14:49, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copied this WP to my sandbox
Talk:Marilou (singer)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover)  ASUKITE 00:05, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Marilou →  – Marilou is an alternate spelling of Mary Lou (name) and should redirect to that disambiguation page. Marilou Berry, Marilou Diaz-Abaya, Marilou Dozois-Prévost, Marilou McPhedran, Marilou Awiakta and Marilou Cayco all have articles on Wikipedia, so Marilou cannot be considered unambiguous. 162 etc. (talk) 22:22, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 14 July 2021
Talk:2008 Kansas City Royals season

message: I saw that other teams game logs have team colors on them, so I did that here as well. If we don't like it, we can change it back. Zerakus (talk) 02:25, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Game Log colors 
Talk:Lady Florence Dixie

message: I found this an interesting article, but was curious about an omission.  Lady Florence seems to have died at the relatively young age of 50.  What was the cause of death? --Elonka 20:06, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Her NYT obituary doesn't give one, but does include another item missing from the article: "Some years ago she startled London by declaring that she had been kidnapped she believed by Irish agitators, and had been held for several days in captivity. Her story was never disproved, but neither was it proved. and there were many people who said that the whole affair was imaginary. " - Nunh-huh 00:07, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Can anyone give a link to this NYT obituary? I'd like to cite it. Xn4 21:07, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Nunh-huh has sent me a copy - many thanks! Xn4 11:35, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Query

message: : Given the tags at the top, I started looking through the article.  There are some family sections that I think could be trimmed significantly: information that isn't directly related to Lady Florence could be cut, information that is relevant to her should be included in a way that makes its relevance TO HER clearer.  E.g. Lady Florence Dixie's grandson Sir Wolstan Dixie.  If she is mentioned in the autobiography he wrote, then something could be said about what he wrote about her; otherwise I'd cut that whole paragraph.  Also the whole "Problem family" section is problematic; it's basically about other people who are covered in other articles.  Also the equation of suicide and mental illness is inappropriate. I would tend to cut this information, working facts in only when their effect on Lady Florence is clearly indicated. For example, if there are materials that discuss Lady Florence's relationship to her twin brother, it would be appropriate to talk about how she felt about him, and her response to his death.  The article is currently unbalanced: later sections on news articles about possible "threats" to Lady Florence are overly heavy; more should be written about her career as a writer. If people have strong opinions about these suggested changes, please let me know. Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 13:12, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: * I checked the family information from Bosie and confirmed that it was a copyvio, pretty much word for word. Moreover, the information quoted was not expanded upon or supported elsewhere in the book, whose scholarship has been questioned in a number of reviews.  On all grounds, inappropriate for the article. Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 20:30, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Some general issues
Talk:John Trumbull Birthplace

message: The article states that "The site is significant for its ... " with nothing past the ellipsis, going back to the article's creation. I can understand why the article's creator did that since the page was created as a stub, but isn't it time somebody filled it in? Cg-realms 22:43, 17 December 2007 (EST)
:sorry about that....  along with fixing up referencing that showed lower skill on my part at the time, have now deleted the wandering off text.... :) doncram (talk) 19:50, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Significant for its what, exactly? 
Talk:CICAP

message: As one would expect since this is an Italian organization, the article over on the Italian version of Wikipedia (CICAP) is much longer and appears to contain more details.  It would be great if someone who speaks both Italian and English could merge the information, pulling the best of both.  Note the footnotes are better in this article, the Italian version only has 4 notes, 3 of which are on CICAP's own website.  --Krelnik (talk) 14:37, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi there Krelnik (talk), I am delighted that you take interest into an Italian organization... but I personally wouldn't pay too much attention to the article translation. Hopefully I am not getting into wp:or but please consider that this organization blatantly excludes dream analysis. If you think about it noone can objectively prove that "dreams really exist". The fact that "subjects vividly recal dreams mostly when awaken during REM sleep"  doesn't prove beyond reasonable doubt that "dreams exist". So what are dreams? Paranormal stuff? Huh? I used the term "reasonable doubt" on purpose because they act as they are a Court instead of applying demarcation criterions. I hope this helps.   M aurice   Carbonaro  11:07, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: If I read you correctly, you are saying: nobody has conclusively proved that dreams exist, ergo they must be some sort of paranormal phenomenon. (And implying that CICAP is not doing their job well because they reject dream analysis as valid science). Your argument contains a number of logical fallacies and is in fact original research - unless you can come up with some reliable sources that say this. --Krelnik (talk) 11:59, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Hallo there Krelnik (talk), thanks for taking time in reading and answering to my comment. Actually I didn't use the word "phenomenon" which is antithetic to "noumenon" and I guess that the "World of Dreams" belongs to the latter. But no problem... encountering paradoxes (faith/offense dicotomies) was seemed as a way to deepen knowledge for philosophers in general. So I shouldn't be offended if you "didn't read me correctly" but flattered that you found worthful engaging in commenting the CICAP article. Okay then let's stick to the "phenomenon" area then. What about the Chelyabinsk meteor phenomenon that took place on the 15th February 2013 then? Wasn't that very VERY paranormal? and with para- I would like to underline the greek etimology of the word: [ "para-" (beyond) "-normal" (normality) ] i.e. "beyond normality". So I will rephrase my comment: How come that they didn't consider at all speculating on that phenomenon then? Wasn't worthed trying to set a demarcation line on what is EXACTLY the target of their research? I hope I didn't fall down in wp:or again. Actually this seems to be an wp:Original Question which is not mentioned (yet) in wp:Wikipedia policies. Cheers.   M aurice   Carbonaro  07:28, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Italian article is better
Talk:The Wonderful Birch

message: Regarding Aarne-Thompson type: Isn't this a combination of tales? Get me for original research, but:
403C: The Witch Secretly Substitutes her own Daughter for the bride. (see AT 403) The husband throws the witch's daughter under the bridge. From the girl's navel grows a reed in which the witch recognizes her own daughter
Not sure what the last part is though; there are various near-matches with the burning the skin motif, nothing I can find based on false brides:
D721.3. Disenchantment by destroying skin (covering).
425G: False Bride Takes Heroine's Place as she tries to stay awake
432*: Bird Lover Disenchanted
441: Hans my Hedgehog
85.210.10.50 23:32, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:Föreningen Vetenskap och Folkbildning

message: Martin Rundkvist (talk) 21:34, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Translated the Swedish article
Talk:Housing and Community Development Act of 1974

message: It could be beneficial to add define or add links to some of the terms used in the introductory paragraph to make the information easy to understand?
Also, consider adding more references with more points of view so that there is no question of bias?
--Carolinekravitz (talk) 06:03, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes

message: Gross Vote Totals, Yea vs Nay is not pedantic, because most legislatures can override vetoes with a 2/3rd-ish vote. 2601:19B:4580:AE0:0:0:0:1 (talk) 22:52, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  likely wrong page for generalized suggestion
Talk:People's Control Commission

message: The article calls the People's Control Commission as semi-civic. Is it like semi-civic or semi-barbaric? Or is it actually meant to be semi-public? Aleksandr Grigoryev (talk) 14:01, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Another issue with statement that there was some organizations beyond government control. How is that possible in the Planned economy? This is a totally nonsense. It may have been declared as semi-governmental, but even Soviet Trade Unions were under total government control like anything else in the Soviet Union. There was no other ownership, but government (nationalized) ownership. Aleksandr Grigoryev (talk) 14:05, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problems with translations
Talk:Chilean frigate Almirante Lynch (PFG-07)

message: The BAE Morán Valverde is now an Ecuadorian ship and has been so for 13 years, it is also not of such importance to Chile to have the name be kept.
The Radioactive Box (talk) 01:31, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename to BAE Morán Valverde
Talk:Onirism

message: The article needs a lot of copyediting, but the subject is notable. (I personally did not edit anything in it at the time I am writing this.) For now, I've sourced and provided context in the article on Dumitru Țepeneag (note that Onirism is the topic of comments in many cultural and political magazines, and the investigation there only dealt with one representative of the trend). I'll therefore be removing the notability tag. Dahn 23:44, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Think it's a school of literature (a literary group), rather than a medical condition.  I'll work on it today.--Wi2g (talk) 14:52, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

message: Looks like the medical meaning was inspired by the literary one, rather than the other way round; I can't find enough sources, though, to justify spinning off the medical definition into a separate article.  Maybe it should be moved to Wiktionary?--Wi2g (talk) 16:28, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The medical term was most probably the first. But the problem is that Dumitru Țepeneag referred to the movement in his essays as "aesthetic" or "structural" onirism (isn't the form "oneirism" more common than "onirism" in English?). By the way, he did not launch a manifesto in France, as he did not want onirism to be confused with Surrealism. This is a Post-Surrealist movement, they rejected automatic writing (not embrace it) and react against Surrealist literature. The idea was to create texts that would not transcribe dreams, but use the laws of dreaming like in the paintings of certain Surrealist painters (who did not use automatic techniques), so that dream becomes an "aesthetic criteria".
--95.77.105.30 (talk) 16:28, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Chicken or egg?
Talk:Thomas Lewis

message: I was looking for a Thomas Lewis. but couldn't find him on the disambiguation page - it turns out he was more commonly known as Tom. I changed the page so that a reader can see at a glance the small list of people, but apparently Jerodlycett thinks it is "fine" that a reader go to 3 different pages trying to find the person they are looking for. Tom is most commonly a contraction of Thomas and people such as Tom Lewis (Australian politician) are properly placed in this disambiguation page. --Find bruce (talk) 21:44, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I did revert your attempted merge of the three pages back to what is established consensus for how disambiguation pages of names are done. Jerod Lycett (talk) 18:11, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Would you care to provide a link to the "established consensus" to the effect that a person called Thomas Lewis should not appear on the Thomas Lewis disambiguation page because they were more commonly called Tom ? --Find bruce (talk) 11:20, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Here's just two of the examples: Thomas Smith#See also Thomas Jones#See also. Jerod Lycett (talk) 17:47, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thomas Tom or Tommy
Talk:Memorial diamond

message: Since cremation ashes are mostly minerals like calcium phosphate diamonds are impossible to make from them. 
71.114.163.55 00:02, 5 October 2007‎ (UTC)
Memorial diamonds are created from hair or cremation remains. During the process both hair and ashes are subject to heat treatment to extract carbon remaining in them.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nstarkell (talk • contribs) 14:23, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this real?

message: At some point we need to apply WP:NOTDIRECTORY to the list of manufacturers section. The present list can probably squeak by since the business model is still pretty new, but I think it is something to keep in mind as this article develops. - 2/0 (cont.) 22:58, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The list was removed at 06:41 (UTC), 15 November 2010 by someone saying "this article is effectively spam..." I disagree with the removal. We shouldn't have a long list, but if the list is relatively short (e.g., up to 20 entries), it seems useful to have (especially if the entries provide some additional information). At the time it was removed, the list contained seven entries. I removed a similar list from the LifeGem article and merged it with the list that was removed in 2010 and put it into this article (after some quick checking to clean up by removing defunct companies and reselling dealers). The resulting list has seven companies. —BarrelProof (talk) 16:15, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of manufacturers
Talk:Record labels owned by James Brown

message: I created this article in order to merge the article stubs devoted to two of Brown's record labels, Try Me and People, something I understand is encouraged where appropriate (though now I'm having trouble finding that policy...), and to eliminate the ill-conceived :Category:James Brown record labels. I haven't done this sort of merge before and I'm not sure I have titled the new article optimally. Although a merge tag has already been place on this article,I do think it is better to have this as a separate page, as the main James Brown article is already quite long (currently 84 kilobytes) and this is a facet of his career that is reasonably distinct from his biography and works as a performer. InnocuousPseudonym 00:02, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Created page
Talk:Arminius Hotel

message: I'm creating the article because the building is on the National Register of Historic Places, and there was no Wikipedia page for it yet. Let me know if there's anything I need to add to it specifically to make it legitimate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Poetas (talk • contribs) 17:08, October 4, 2007
:We can always use more NRHP articles. Actually all NRHP sites are notable but if you can add cited information and history from reliable sources notability won't even be a question. Thanks for doing Commodore too, I always liked that building. Katr67 19:19, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article creation