Talk:Republic of China Army

message: Due to a revert war this article has been temporarily locked. Please discuss edits on the talk page and avoid reverting articles. -Will Beback 21:39, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Protected

message: I searched on google and got this:
* 16,500 for "Taiwan Army"
* 783 for "Republic of China Army"
I know we definitely shouldn't move the article because it's the official name, but shouldn't we also include the common name in the article?--Jerry 23:31, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Disambiguation already exists in the first paragraph and Taiwan Army redirects to Republic of China Army. -Loren 23:50, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What I meant was that we should add it so it'll look something like this:Republic of China Army, commonly known as Taiwan Army...--Jerry 00:45, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think the disambiguation pretty much covers that issue already. No need to be redundant. -Loren 00:52, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

text: TingMing (posing as "Navality"), I think you need to go see a psychiatrist - it's obvious you have some sort of obsessive-compulsive disorder with editing wikipedia, given you keep making sockpuppets to try to get around your ban. John Smith's 08:45, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A report has been filed against TingMing/Navality. Nat Tang  talk to me! | Check on my contributions!|Email Me! 10:50, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

text: And you are not the sole body to judge whether one is pushing a POV or not, especially given your only-worsening status quo. Vic226說 17:03, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Taiwan Army" as the common name? 

message: Just avoid an editing war, what type of English should we use? Commonwealth English or American English? I'd like to hear you thoughts on this. Nat Tang  talk to me! | Check on my contributions!|Email Me! 03:39, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that's not the focal point, so both of them should be fine.--Jerry 18:02, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: okidokie :D Nat Tang  talk to me! | Check on my contributions!|Email Me! 18:04, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling in the article.... 

message: I'd like to inquire on whether they were produced for the ROC army or not in the 1990s. Ominae (talk) 07:28, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Its a prototype for a project that wasnt given the go ahead - the CM32 took over instead (read this article). Next time please don't add to the article like that if you just have a query. 82.32.19.175 (talk) 09:54, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd like to do an article about this in the future and I'm asking for clarification only. Thanks. Ominae (talk) 04:01, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  CM-31 6x6 vehicles question 

message: In the tables that list the various aircraft, missiles, etc and anon-IP editor has changed upper case descriptions to lower case ones. For example "maritime patrol aircraft" instead of "Maritime patrol aircraft". I personally prefer upper case, so unless anyone has strong objections I will change them over when I have the time. Otherwise please leave your views here. 
Furthermore I'm not happy with the current layout of the tables - I also don't like the colour. if there are no objections I'll look into combining some more and changing the colour when I have the time. John Smith's (talk) 20:22, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Upper or lower case and general style

message: Please note that we use "Republic of China (Taiwan)", not "Republic of China (ROC)" as the former indicates the official name but at the same time making reference to the geographical location (i.e. the island) that everyone knows. Most people don't know what the ROC is - they think of China. So please don't change this. John Smith's (talk) 17:31, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Naming conventions

message: This editor has been removing wikilinks from all three ROC military pages with no explanation. I have reverted his latest changes as vandalism - please be on the look-out. If he does it again, please report him. John Smith's (talk) 12:44, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits by 24.85.227.16‎  

message: I think that the IP user 71.185.193.245 may be accessing out-of-date information. The CM-31 design was discontinued - read the following.
Globalsecurity report
It has been replaced by the CM-32 - no CM-31s were ordered from what I know. So I have changed the article accordingly. John Smith's (talk) 21:59, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  CM-31 

message: Here is a proper infobox for use on the article. Please add other available info. I'm not sure about including the aircraft section, it might be bad for an army article?
Note: Remove the <nowiki> tags from roca.png when placing it on the article. It is commented out as using it here is not 'fair use'. --Wanders1 (talk) 12:17, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New infobox 

message: This article is missing any information on the Republic of China's Ballistic Missile Program.
See http://www.scienceandworldaffairs.org/PDFs/Kurosaki_Vol1.pdf  (table on page 17)
And http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/hticbm/articles/20110501.aspx
The Republic of China has at least two, possible three different operational Short or Intermediate Range Ballistic Missles (SRBM or IRBM). One is called Ching Feng (Green Bee), one called Tien Chi (Sky Spear). There isn't enough information to determine if the second linked article is referred to the Ching Feng missile, or a third entirely different type.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.75.76.27 (talk) 02:51, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Because the SSM/SRBM/IRBM program doesn't belong to ROC Army. It belongs to ROC GHQ.....Ching Feng retired before entered service, since its range is only about 100 mile. Tien Chi is converted TK-2 SAM, range about 200 miles. Sky Horse of early 1980s and whatever follow on missile program is the SSM/IRBM that's the big unknown.... Bryan TMF (talk) 14:48, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ballistic Missile information missing 

message: Heard about it recently but can't confirm it yet. It's not on the list here, but ROC Army does still have those M59 Long Tom 155 mm Towed Howitzer.....Bryan TMF (talk) 01:48, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  M114 155mm Towed Howitzer still in service with ROC Army? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Republic of China Army. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100529162120/http://news.chinatimes.com:80/realtime/0,5255,110101x112010052600884,00.html to http://news.chinatimes.com/realtime/0,5255,110101x112010052600884,00.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:02, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The text includes the following sentence: "An estimated 80% of the ROC Army is located on Taiwan" - here, the usage of "Taiwan" refers to the Island whereas the underlying link refers to the state "Taiwan" .... --DAsia (talk) 07:30, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misleading usage of "Taiwan" 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Republic of China Army. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://report.mnd.gov.tw/eng/pdf/all-1-360.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090227183431/http://www.dsca.mil/PressReleases/36-b/2008/Taiwan_08-41.pdf to http://www.dsca.mil/PressReleases/36-b/2008/Taiwan_08-41.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721172006/https://www.dsca.osd.mil/PressReleases/36-b/2010/Taiwan_09-03.pdf to http://www.dsca.osd.mil/PressReleases/36-b/2010/Taiwan_09-03.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:14, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Republic of China Army. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100301175815/http://www.defense.gov/news/May1996/m052396_m108-96.html to http://www.defense.gov/news/May1996/m052396_m108-96.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:38, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:18, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: 'LBold' 2409:4088:9C9C:46FE:EDFB:1D80:6965:B8DC (talk) 05:17, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  I me raju চিন সেনা হতে চাই Get