Talk:Russian deep submergence rescue vehicle AS-28

message: An Air Force picture at  might be a nice addition to this article. The section of the AF's site containing the pic is at . Nrbelex (talk) 22:11, 6 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I did it myself once I had some free time. Nrbelex (talk) 23:29, 6 August 2005 (UTC)

text: US Government photos and graphics are released into the public domain according to US law while British government photos are not.  This results in many US government photos on Wikipedia as we don't have to worry about copyright infringement issues.  Time for the Brits to lobby their government to change their laws... - BanyanTree 17:19, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: What was said above + that's just what I found; I didn't seek out an American photo over a British photo. If Wikipedia had permission to use a British picture and I found it as easily as I did the posted one, I would have been more than happy to use the other. Nrbelex (talk) 21:24, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Air Force Picture to Add 

message: The British team on the site says it's cutting through nets - http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/4127586.stm 
The article also refers to reports with entangled with anchor / anchor cable - is that still considered a possibility?
No one really knows what that was. FlubbedNebula88 (talk) 15:14, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fishing nets or Anchor Cable 

message: I'm not sure what the wikipedia style manual says, but shouldn't the full name "remotely Operated Vehicle" be used at least once before adopting the acronym. Aids readability, without forcing readers to follow links just to get the meaning of the story.--stib 11:30, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's a ROV? 

message: Were the surface ships in communication with the sub during the rescue? How was the accident relayed to the Russian Navy in the first place? I could not find anything on TV news or internet which discussed communication with the sub. Thanks. Jimaginator 14:19, August 8, 2005 (UTC)
:According to this local ABC article "It wasn't clear if contact was made by radio or by some other means, but officials said it was taking place every few hours." I don't think the Russians are being very clear about it. C14 19:54, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: IIRC The Russians have some sort of Under-Water Telephone that they use for Sub-to-Ship and Sub-to-Sub comms.--Theredstarswl 21:05, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Communication with Sub 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Russian deep submergence rescue vehicle AS-28. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20050706102522/http://sorbetroyal2005.celex.net:80/ to http://www.sorbetroyal2005.celex.net/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:39, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Russian deep submergence rescue vehicle AS-28. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101130062533/http://russian-ships.info/eng/submarines/project_1855.htm to http://russian-ships.info/eng/submarines/project_1855.htm
*Added  tag to http://ca.today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=topNews&storyID=2005-08-06T153752Z_01_L06478971_RTRIDST_0_NEWS-RUSSIA-SUBMARINE-COL.XML
*Added  tag to http://www.mosnews.com/news/2005/08/06/liftsub.shtml
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080205064859/http://onnachrichten.t-online.de/c/51/17/32/5117326.html to http://onnachrichten.t-online.de/c/51/17/32/5117326.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:09, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The article is not about the submarine at all, just about the accident; the title should reflect the content of the article. It is called AS-28 emergency in List of submarine incidents since 2000#AS-28 emergency, so I suggest to use this title. WikiHannibal (talk) 12:50, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename/Move 

message: The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
----
I propose that this article be split, as it is a wp:COATRACK mostly being about the accident and the rescue of the sub. Similar to the Titan (submersible) and Titan submersible implosion situation, where the accident article is separate from the sub article. This article is mostly about the sub accident and not the sub itself outside of that accident. So that content needs to be moved as it seems like the topic of this article from its content is the accident instead of the sub. 
-- 64.229.90.172 (talk) 23:49, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Hardly seems worthwhile for so small an article. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 00:23, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, and this is not what a COATRACK is. The accident happened to this submersible, so it's reasonable to talk about it here. That no one has bothered to write up anything else about the vessel yet isn't a reason to split this fairly short article up. Parsecboy (talk) 09:12, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

text: Oppose. No advantage in splitting this article (and leaving behind just two lines of prose). No objection to Rescue of the AS-28 or similar as a redirect to here.  (Incidentally Titan (submersible) was not a split from Titan submersible implosion, but from OceanGate, to restore balance in that article.) Guessing from the inordinate length of External Links, there should be ready material to improve this article. Davidships (talk) 12:45, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

text: Oppose. If the rescue operation is split into a separate article, there is very little left for the original article. Tupsumato (talk) 13:02, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

text: Oppose. There is not enough content to justify a split. The current title accommodates the vessel and the rescue so is not a coatrack and should not be changed, so no split, no move. Reconsider if the article is ever big enough. · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 11:41, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

text: Oppose - not enough to warrant a split. Llammakey (talk) 14:36, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Split: to [[Rescue of the AS-28]]