lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Encopresis

message: Go on. Let's see a whole encyclopedia entry on encopresis. Wetman 19:41, 27 Jan 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Go

message: The article now says encopresis is a cause of anismus;  the general view in the medical literature is that anismus is a cause of encopresis.  66.167.43.31 (talk) 22:59, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anismus 

message: Alternatively, when this method fails for six months or longer, a more aggressive approach may be undertaken using the “bottom up” approach
"“bottom up” approach"
Oh, come on.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by DTM (talk • contribs) 19:02, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed references to "top-down" and "bottom-up" on the reason that they are tautologies, as the nature of the two approaches can be understood from the explanations that follow. Devil Master (talk) 21:58, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Up ''where?'' 

message: I have changed the intro to accordingly. Liquid stool incontinence in adults is a separate clinical topic from this phenomena in children.
I am working on this to be either a new page, or to add to the main fecal incontinence page.Tepi (talk) 13:33, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Update: this page was created as fecal leakage, since this was the most common term used for it in adults.Tepi (talk) 22:46, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Encopresis is a pediatric term 

message: Whoever placed references in the text regarding RAIR is confused. It is not the same as anismus. RAIR is present in healthy people, indeed there would be problems if it was not present.
RAIR is involuntary relaxation of internal sphincter when rectum is distended. It is present during anesthesia ebcause it is reflexive, i.e. not under voluntary control.
I think the previous author meant to use term rectoanal excitatory reflex (RAER), which is contraction of external anal sphincter with rectal distension.Tepi (talk) 13:40, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rectoanal inhibitory response is not the same as anismus 

message: 1. A condition where there is "constipation with fecal retention in which watery colonic contents bypass the hard fecal masses and pass through the rectum. This condition is often confused with diarrhea." - Taber's Cyclopedic Medical Dictionary 20th ed., p.699 (encopresis). [Also check ICD-10-CM Code F98.1 which has a similar same meaning].
2. Voluntary or involuntary loss of stool in the pediatric population (4+ yo). 
3. A psychiatric diagnosis, from someone defecating in interesting places. I wasn't able to find it from the DSM-5 [The impact of DSM-5 and guidelines for assessment and treatment of elimination disorders. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24571816/]
One is medically specific and can lead to a diagnosis, while the other is not (a kid shat). If the term is still used in psychiatry, let's add it too.
Now the article is a blob of incontinence. Enigma55 (talk) 23:47, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  At least three distincts definitions
Talk:Parimutuel betting

message: For people as inept as I am in understanding betting, some computational examples would make this article, and other articles on gambling, more comprehensible.  Jm546 17:32, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Computational examples 

message: Does it bother anybody else that we substantially have the trifecta listed twice? First as "across the boards" and then under "exotic bets" under its common name. Matt Gies 17:31, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redundancy 

message: Could someone discuss in more detail how the payoffs for Place and Show bets are calculated?  I'm assuming that it is the same as for Win bets (some slice of the overall pool), but that is an assumption. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 161.179.128.52 (talk) 19:25, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Place and Show 

message: Would be nice having some clear definitions as:
- net/gross pool 
- net pool on a bet and a race minus the taxes: is there a specific term? Maybe prizemoney?
- On several website I found horse racing statistics which uses "annual turnover". What does it means turnover on horse racing? Is it the sum of net pools on all the races and bets?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.175.51.15 (talk) 10:43, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some definition 

message: Hello,
In the example: "Thus, the total pool of money on the event is $1028.00."
This is wrong, the total sum is 798 dollars.
The whole example may need to be corrected.
Irmo322 (talk) 23:13, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The original table was changed (vandalised) by an IP in May. I've restored it to the original, which matches the text, and reverted a fix to the calculated odds table that used the vandalised figure for horse #1. Tobus (talk) 01:21, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Example is wrong
Talk:Chess opening

message: Per WP:EL, "External links in an article can be helpful to the reader, but they should be kept minimal, meritable, and directly relevant to the article." I will review the current list of external links against this guideline and remove those which come under the category of WP:LINKSTOAVOID. MaxBrowne (talk) 02:33, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, I agree. Quale (talk) 02:55, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too many external links 

message: just a suggestion: maybe there could be history of openings section. Some openings must be newer than others. And the popularity of openings must have changed over time. Something along these lines may be interesting to read. I'm just starting to sketch out some things in the shogi world (Shogi_opening#History_of_opening_research) and didnt see anything similar here. – ishwar  (speak) 00:22, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: History?

message: 4     	a4       	b4	c4       	d4	e4	f4       	g4	h4
3     	a3 or Na3	b3	c3 or Nc3	d3	e3	f3 or Nf3	g3	h3 or Nh3
 	a        	b 	c        	d 	e 	f        	g 	h
This is how I liked to see the opening information presented. By hovering over the links, you can also quiz yourself about the move names. Jason Quinn (talk) 16:17, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: In practice the sensible flank openings often transpose; 1.g3 has little identity of its own for example. Double sharp (talk) 15:34, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nice way to summarize openings 

message: It seems to me that the vast majority of the openings here often refer to the player with he/his pronouns instead of they/their suggested by MOS:GNL.
Toron4 (talk) 05:48, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I took a crack at this Popsofctown (talk) 05:14, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changing pronouns in openings  

message: Hi. I made a bar graph of the 1st move percentage for the wikibook, so I mention it here in case you are interested. :File:Chess firstMove.png However, I did include a non-master database into the average, which (if you are like most chess books) may displease you. Anyway, yall can use it or not. – ishwar  (speak) 17:00, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: first move graph
Talk:Phocaeans

message: This redirect is wrong Phoceans were from Phocea not Phocis!! User:Silthor
:Isn't Phocea another name for Phocis? Angela. 00:51, Jan 28, 2004 (UTC)
::No! See Phocea and Phocis. Paul August ☎ 20:10, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Olympia (Paris)

message: It would be shortened a little bit by removing Björk, who is mentioned two times.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.134.147.194 (talk) 19:30, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: This section is far too lengthy and clustered. Not every act that has performed there has to be in this article. If anyone feels very passionately about having such a list then create a separate "List of artists that performed at Olympia" or something like that. I'm trimming that section now. EagerToddler39 (talk) 21:55, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: International artists

message: Evangp undid my revidion when I moved this article from Olympia (Paris) to Olympia Bruno Coquatrix. I did this because the article has to bare the full name of the venue, wich is unwritten rule for wikipedia articles of music halls, venues etc. There are several examples:
* Carnegie hall is called after Andrew Carnegie, but it's article name didn't drop "Carnegie". 
* Sears Tower was renamed to Willis Tower after Sears company sold it, though it is an iconic name recogniued by whole world.
Also will we name article for "Anna Meares Velodrome" in Chandler, as "Velodrome (Chandler)" ??
"Olympia" is commonly known name only in English speaking countries. Whole Paris and all people that performed there, especially Dalida, always referred to it as Olympia Bruno Coqatrix... I think that this theme should be left to us, Parisians, to decide.Dalida Editor  please ping or message me' 16:31, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Olympia Bruno Coqatrix; name of article
Talk:Anarcha-feminism

message: Wendy McElroy needs to be included in the individualist section and the sex/porn section. She is the leading individualist feminist.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.204.31.239 (talk) 19:26, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where is Wendy McElroy? 

message: I decided to have a look at variants of the title, as I was wondering if perhaps "anarchist feminism" was popular enough to warrant putting it at the beginning. Google Ngrams seems to suggest that the term "anarcha-feminism" has been the more commonly-used term since 2009, closely followed by "anarchist feminism" (the previously most-used term), and then by "anarcho-feminism". The variants "anarchofeminism", "feminist anarchism" and "anarchafeminism" appear to be far less used, so I think they should be kept out of the lead. (I'm not sure how much adding the unhyphenated variants brings to the table anyway) --Grnrchst (talk) 12:27, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Variants on title
Talk:Natural law

message: Should probably also mention that natural law is used by people such as Thomas Hobbes to justify political absolutism... the article right now doesn't cover that aspect. ~ Booyabazooka 01:26, 30 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: other view

message: I was curious as to whether there would be consensus regarding a reorganization of this page.  I think we might gain additional clarity by treating the topic historically, noting what natural law meant to the stoics, the Thomists, the early moderns, legal scholars, contemporary theorists, etc.  This might help avoid the trend to say what natural law "really is," or provide additional defenses/critiques of it in he article.  The most recent addition of a long meditation of what it means to be a person, how this relates to nature, and to sexuality, for example, seems alien to natural law tradition of, say, the stoics.  Noting that the concept has evolved might avoid such distortions.  In some theories, it is inseparable from theology, in some it is very separate, and in some it is oblivious to theological questions.  It might also be good to note that natural law legal theories have diverged from their philosophic roots; this would avoid the cross-disciplinary confusion that can oftentimes result. -RJC 02:20, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The article as it is now it is all over the place in some parts and is not very reader friendly so a reorganization, I would imagine, would be well received. -- PullUpYourSocks 02:46, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: reorganization?

message: What is this meant to mean? Brehon law is not used in Ireland anymore, and the source doesn't mention anything about this Adhiyana (talk) 08:21, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "It has been included in an Ethno-Celtic breakaway subculture, as it has religious undertones and freedom of religious expression allows it to once again be used as a valid system in Western Europe" 

message: I suggest that we change the opening of the article. The opening that I suggest is goes like this - 
"Natural law is a legal framework founded upon the meticulous examination of natural order and human behavior. It asserts that intrinsic values inherent to human nature can be discerned and applied independently of the explicit laws enacted by a state or society."
That to me seems bang on and not to mention much more effective than the current opening. What do you guys say? Adityaverma8998 (talk) 15:11, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Here is my suggestion
Talk:Toy train

message: Thomas the Train -- Don't you mean Thomas the Tank Engine?
-Anthropos 01:32, 28 Jan 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: D'oh! You're right. I'll fix it. -Dave Farquhar 04:04, 28 Jan 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Thomas

message: I was trying to find what width 'O' gauge is.  This article puts it at 35mm, but the 'O' scale page puts it at 32mm.  Is this a mistake, or is there an inconsistency in the industry?  At least a note stating the reason for the difference may be useful.
Hope this comment helps to improve the content. Good job! :-)
:The discrepancy is due to the Maerklin practice of measuring between the centers of rails that were about 3 millimeters or 1/8 inch wide, rather than between the inside faces of the railheads.
:Incidentally, there seems to be something wrong with the gauge 1 numbers, since 45 millimeters is actually the gauge between the inside faces.  This throws all the numbers into doubt, since it is not clear which measurement they represent.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.53.195.38 (talk) 17:46, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  O widths...
Talk:Conformation

message: Somehow we only have dogs and horses. This seems like a serious omission, but I'm not sure how to fix it. This term is used in many species of domesticated animals; articles on goats, swine, cattle, sheep, rabbits (the ones I checked) have to get along without this term being linked.  —jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 07:34, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conformation (animal breeding)
Talk:List of secondary and special-issue World War II infantry weapons

message: I would like to keep this page distinct for weapons which saw limited service, but were far from mainstream.  This page is NOT to include weapons that never made it past design or trial stages.  Production numbers for listed weapons should usually be greater then about a thousand. Oberiko 21:26, 27 Jan 2004
I'm afraid you can't really make rules about a page.  This is a cooperative process and people WILL add what they think should be here.  RickK 02:49, 28 Jan 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: List of World War II infantry weapons had the contentious "common" removed from the title, and this list was merged there. As an aside, many of the entries here were already listed there. I left out Wimmersperg Spz because there's no proof it was ever issued. Clarityfiend (talk) 00:39, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger
Talk:Heckler & Koch MP5

message: I removed the Sentence " It also had its first film "The Millions Games" released on October 18, 1970." from the history section as it is unclear wether this is truely the first appearence in a film and does not firt in the flow of this pararagraph. However, I think it could be mentioned in as section about the use in popular culture.--Saehrimnir (talk) 09:06, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  In popular Culture 

message: Poland is ommitted in the users section - both in the table and the map. The fact is, MP5 is widely used by Polish Police, Special Forces and many other Government institutions.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.17.192.185 (talk) 07:16, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Users - Poland 

message: I think there should be a subsection of former users where many of the current "users " should be moved.For example :Zahir Qadirs frontier force, Salvadoran National Guard Smahwk (talk) 10:30, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Former users subsection
Talk:The Man from Snowy River (poem)

message: I can't see an obvious place to put this in the article as it stands, but I think it's worth noting: all the famous riders the poem mentions by name are characters from earlier Paterson poems; Harrison, for instance, is from "Old Pardon, the Son of Reprieve", and Clancy is of course from "Clancy of the Overflow".
—Paul A 02:47, 28 Jan 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  [Character reuse] 

message: Is there a reason the poem isn't part of this page, and is only linked to?  It would make sense that since this page is about the poem, the poem should be here.  76.17.188.167 11:38, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: See WP:NPS. --Robert Merkel 09:16, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

text: Does not belong here.  Move to WikiSource and provide link from here to there.  Mathglot (talk) 16:49, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, so I've done that as well as moving the wikisource link higher up on the page so it is more obvious. Perry Middlemiss (talk) 21:24, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: The Poem

message: Is the "End of an Era" section of this article really relevant? Seems like needless politicising to me, it really has little to do with the poem....  —Preceding unsigned comment added by ElZilcho (talk • contribs) 10:28, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree in part. The mountain cattlemen and the National Party did openly hang their extensive media campaign on imagery from the poem and film, as epitomised by the Peter Ryan quote - so I believe the events themselves are relevant to the article, as a significant case of the text's place and use in modern culture. As the section stands, however, it does not describe this politicization but is a brazen example of it, and at best must be entirely rewritten. The heading alone is partisan and inflammatory. Lainagier (talk) 21:27, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "End of an Era" - necessary? 

message: Hi people, I just added in the lyrics. I couldn't find an approiate place to put the lyrics, so if you know how you add in sub-titles, feel free to create one and then copy & paste it in :)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.210.120.212 (talk) 07:28, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  [Lyrics] 
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Highways

message: Hello, WikiProject,
A new editor, User:Asa "ClarkShark", is creating a lot of articles on Mississippi highways. So far, he hasn't engaged much on his User talk page. I think it would help if one of your participants looked over his creations as I'm uncertain of the standards for highway articles. Thanks for any assistance you can provide. Liz Read! Talk! 02:26, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for your message. I'm still learning the site and the process. Asa "ClarkShark" (talk) 01:41, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Request

message: There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Right of way#Requested move 14 May 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 14:22, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move at [[Talk:Right of way#Requested move 14 May 2024]]
Talk:University of Toronto

message: Jordan Peterson is certainly a notable person of this University. 78.49.172.175 (talk) 09:50, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The current list in the main article is too long as seen in the hidden notes. Please edit List of University of Toronto alumni instead. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 13:39, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: What is the criteria for being added to the notable alumni section in the article, or being relegated to the list article? Magnolia677 (talk) 17:08, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I've had an interesting exchange on the Swarthmore College talk page about this. Small school, fairly highly ranked, and a bloated (?) list of over 650 notable alumni on its notables page.  A portion of these are also listed on the main college article.  Another editor had opined that inclusion on the main article should be limited to those who are also listed on Wikipedia pages for other languages (interwiki links), first setting this bar at 14 non-English wikis and now 25.  While novel, I argued that this criteria has no bearing on actual notability, nor had I seen it used elsewhere. We entered a cordial reversion cycle.  No one had offered further comment on his idea, so I suggested (as I do here, for UT) that notability factors should be listed, by category of professional life, with specific attainment levels to warrant inclusion on either the main article, or the 'notable alumni' article.  Jax MN (talk) 17:34, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  Not just on alumni articles, but on city articles too.  The really important ones go on the main article, and the B-listers go on the other.  If I had a Wiki article I'd be crestfallen to find myself on that "less important list". Magnolia677 (talk) 19:11, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Jordan Peterson is a very controversial individual (with indefinite semi-protection even), but a very notable individual nonetheless. I am unsure if an exception can be made and him being added or not to the main article. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 00:52, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add Jordan Peterson 

message: https://nturanking.csti.tw/ranking/bySchoolName/University%20of%20Toronto Dreamer199202 (talk) 22:40, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not notable enough. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 01:44, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add NTU Ranking to the table 

message: — Assignment last updated by Jazkeilani (talk) 18:07, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Writing 1 TR Both Classes
Talk:Three forms of mathematical induction

message: As I have mentioned at transfinite induction, you do need to prove P(0). Mark Hurd 20:19, 3 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: You completely misunderstand.  Yes, you need to prove P(0), but you don't need to prove it separately when you get get both parts of the proof in one step.  In the kind of examples used in secondary school, the two steps do need to be separate.  In one particular form of mathematical induction, appearing third on this list, one step gets both the case n = 0 and the more general case, without need for a separate step to prove the case n = 0.  Michael Hardy 23:23, 3 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  P(0) is required to be proved! 

message: When someone gets to examples, I think they should come after the list of three forms. Michael Hardy 23:18, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Examples
Talk:Scrum

message: See also Talk:Scrum (management)
---
I removed the following as a "standard meaning" of Scrum:
* An American slang term for the perineum, the area between the scrotum or vagina, and the anus.
Scrum certainly sounds like it should be something vulgar (and some may agree that Scrum (development) meets those criteria), but it is not a standard American slang term. 65.202.85.12  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.202.85.12 (talk) 19:17, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

message: Scrum seems to have been adopted by main stream media announcers of NCAA college football games in the United States.  For example, I've heard it for the first time during the 2008 bowl season during multiple games by different broadcasters. -Anon, Jan 2009  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.106.160.208 (talk) 22:57, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: American Football
Talk:Greater Underwater Propulsion Power Program

message: Hello 
the current article states that the Guppy I modification lead to a unterwater speed of approximately 18 knots but does not state for how long this speed could be held. I looked for that information in the Web but did not find anything useful. It would also be good to have that information for the other Guppy programs, like the Snorkelprogram and Guppy IA. Oub (talk) 16:37, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Unterwater performance of all Guppy classes 

message: What were the fates of the Guppy/Fleet Snorkel boats? IIRC, they were all surplused off after Nautilus was launched. To where?  Trekphiler (talk) 03:12, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Many (most) served into the 1970's before being decommissioned and scrapped.  IIRC all are gone now.  See the individual boat articles for details. 24.16.177.215 (talk) 01:48, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Sanford & Son