Talk:East Lancashire Railway (1844–1859)

message: Should the title of this page be 1844-1849?  The ELR amalgamated with the LYR in 1859.  If this is merely a typo, could it be changed to 'East Lancashire Railway 1844-1859'.  Thanks Hutch 12:31, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually it should be 1845 - 1849, since the company did not technically exist in 1844.  I have created an article for one of the companies that formed the merger.  Any thoughts?  I will move the article to 1845 if nobody minds. Parrot of Doom (talk) 01:59, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Date Question

message: Theres a fair bit of back story in the 'formation' section which while interesting has no sources, and appears unverifiable?  As it is now, it appears biased. Parrot of Doom 23:38, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  lack of sources 

message: I'm putting this here so it doesn't get lost.  It probably isn't WP:OR but until I find a source for it...
In 1843 the Manchester and Leeds Railway (M&LR) decided to extend their Heywood coal branch to Bury.  The sight of their surveyors caused considerable anxiety in the town; the Leeds company, described as the "Lies and Mancheater [sic] Railway" in a contemporary poster, and "the most brutal line in the kingdom" by the inhabitants of Huddersfield), was unpopular, and some of the influential inhabitants (led by John Grundy, a rich cloth merchant) decided to take matters into their own hands.
The promoters wished to reach the intended Manchester station at Hunts Bank (Victoria Station) by means of a junction with the Manchester and Leeds Railway at Collyhurst, hoping that this would induce the Leeds company to abandon its own scheme.
However, the Leeds directors played them along, while pressing ahead with their own plans. Fortunately, the Bury Provisional Committee saw through this trickery, and came to an agreement with the Manchester and Bolton Railway, reaching Victoria Station by means of a junction at Clifton.
Public interest was aroused by the scheme, and pressure was exerted to extend the line further, but it was too late to incorporate this in the Parliamentary Bill.
The ELR was now guided by Cornelius Nicholson, something of a Victorian polymath - he was an ex-mayor of Kendal, a promoter of the Caledonian Railway, and a correspondent of Wordsworth. Nicholson modelled himself upon George Hudson, the Railway King, and proposed a railway empire based upon Bury. His wilder schemes (which included promoting a line to Scotland) came to nothing, but the ELR certainly expanded.  Unfortunately, Nicholson's ambitions, especially the promotion of the ELR as part of an alternative trans-Pennine route, had made a serious enemy.
:Most of this is derived from "The Coming of Steam", a booklet produced by the Bury Civic Society in the 1980s.
--Train guard (talk) 14:50, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for that.  I doubt however it would be useable right now as it seems fairly biased. Parrot of Doom (talk) 00:31, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

text: Well for one thing I don't have it here in front of me, so can't add page numbers and other details.  Secondly I don't know if it contains an index, or any references itself (although to be fair some sources in this article also do not do this), but thirdly as the text now stands I think it is a little too coloured to be suitable for an encyclopaedic entry.  I have been able to find nothing—nothing—else that mentions a "Leeds and Mancheater" Railway anywhere, and you'd expect to find at least a mention or two of this in other publications.  I've looked everywhere for this.  I've only found mention of Nicholson being on the board of directors, and not the chairman or a leading figure.  I don't doubt however that verified information like this would make a valuable addition to the article. Parrot of Doom (talk) 11:18, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, I tell a lie - I did find a Lies and Mancheater here but am unable to read it.  Other similar results get Manchester and Mancheater mixed up on the optical character recognition. Parrot of Doom (talk) 11:23, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  unsourced material 

message: I'm not going to get involved in the GA review for this – I'm a notoriously bad reviewer – but a few thoughts:
*The article could really do with a "legacy" section. At present, the only mention of the 150 years post 1859 is "Following the Beeching Axe much of the ELR's network was closed, but parts of the original MB&RR lane are now used by the East Lancashire Railway, a modern heritage railway opened in 1987". How much of the infrastructure still stands? Was the trackbed converted for other uses (roads, cyclepaths etc)? Are the stations still standing and if so, what are they used for?;
:None of the track from Clifton Junction to Radcliffe remains, it has now been converted into a nature trail.  From Radcliffe to just outside Bury the railway was shared with what is now the Metrolink Manc-Bury line.  The modern ELR has the line up to Rawtenstall but no further.  As for the other lines, I don't yet have a map of the network in 1859 so cannot say.  It will take a visit to a library with a good railway book for me to get this information. Parrot of Doom (talk) 22:04, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd mention the nature trail in that case. This is England; people are interested in ruins and assorted derelict things. (Assuming you're in Manchester, I'd strongly recommend a trip to Ian Allan at 5 Piccadilly Station Approach, who are the biggest transport-history bookshop in the country and will happily sell you every conceivable historic map, book of old photographs, line history…) – iridescent 22:17, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I cycle up there all the time (even today) so getting the odd picture won't be difficult.  Thanks for the bookshop tip, that's tomorrow sorted :) Parrot of Doom (talk) 22:55, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

text: Well the up line in this case would be Manchester, but the important part is that the L&YR ran a train on the wrong rails, in the face of oncoming traffic. Parrot of Doom (talk) 16:11, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, I know that – I'm just trying to think in Sandy Mode. (One of Giano's observations which is almost always correct is, assume your reader is a bright 14 year old with no prior knowledge, and ask yourself if they'd understand every term.) I had a similar row once about whether trolley pole, points and siding needed to be explained in the text. – iridescent 17:26, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

text: I have tried and tried, but can find none.  There must be drawings and such in local publications.  I may be able to sort this out on the weekend. Parrot of Doom (talk) 16:11, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thoughts 

message: PoD et al, have you seen the report of the opening of the line in The Manchester Guardian? Would it not be suitable at least as a part of a further reading section? Yes, it is typical florid Victorian journalese but it conveys some idea of the corporate pride etc that otherwise we cannot really show. Details are:   - available via Manchester Libraries Access arrangements, which I'd guess PoD has already. If not, then mail me. - Sitush (talk) 19:50, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Report of opening 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on East Lancashire Railway 1844–59. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090326081658/http://www.irwellsculpturetrail.co.uk/IST_sculpture_leaflet.pdf to http://www.irwellsculpturetrail.co.uk/IST_sculpture_leaflet.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:55, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified