Talk:CITES

message: As CITES is an international agreeemnt, it would be intersting to see a CITES artical on many different language wikis and fully incorporated in each wiki. Snowman 08:53, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  International 

message: If the page name change to CITES has a consensus approval, then there is some work to be done on the double redirects to this page.  Is there a bot to do this? Snowman 09:34, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name of page

message: At first, I thought this page had a copyright violation in it, because it shares some of the wording with http://www.itto.or.jp/live/Live_Server/1637/E-C41-18.doc but apparently, that document copied this! It is dated October 11, and it shares some sections about the background of CITES with sections of this page that are dated earlier. LittleDantalk 20:40, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of this page 

message: It was founded in 1963, not 1973. http://www.cites.org/eng/disc/what.shtml
Iminrainbows (talk) 23:01, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year founded 

message: What is the flower on the symbol? An orchid perhaps? Axl ¤ [Talk] 11:23, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Symbol's flower 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on CITES. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120125111255/http://www.cites.org:80/eng/disc/parties/alphabet.php to http://www.cites.org/eng/disc/parties/alphabet.php
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110120150226/http://www.cites.org:80/cms/index.php/lang-en/component/ncd/ to http://www.cites.org/cms/index.php/lang-en/component/ncd/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:42, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: As of writing the Wikipedia page says that the CITES list protects enangered plants and animals. However, does the treaty really and explicitly exclude other regna, such as Fungi? –Tommy Kronkvist (talk), 05:12, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The initial clause of the initial sentence of the Preamble in the text of the Convention reads: "Recognizing that wild fauna and flora in their many beautiful and varied forms are an irreplaceable part of the natural systems of the earth which must be protected for this and the generations to come;" (see https://cites.org/eng/disc/text.php#texttop). Appendices I, II and III to the Convention are lists of species afforded different levels or types of protection from over-exploitation (see https://cites.org/eng/app/index.php). See also Kingdom (biology)#Summary, the lead paragraph of the Flora article, and the lead paragraph of the Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines project page. Wtmitchell  (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 23:19, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other kingdoms than Animalia and Plantae 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on CITES. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100621160652/http://law.vanderbilt.edu/publications/journal-of-transnational-law/archives/volume-36-number-5/download.aspx?id=1907 to http://law.vanderbilt.edu/publications/journal-of-transnational-law/archives/volume-36-number-5/download.aspx?id=1907
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:22, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: In some instances, wildlife parks may decide to remove the horn of animals as a preventive measure against poaching. Animal horns can be safely sawn off without hurting the animal (it is similar to clipping toe nails).
Can horns, obtained in this way be legally sold under CITES by wildlife parks to help fund their own operation ? Mention in article.
--Genetics4good (talk) 10:36, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Tusk selling by wildlife parks

message: We must try to help repopulate the American alligator in the REO grand river, because they were all up and down this river during the days of the Indians. We must try to repopulate this endangered animal in there natural habitats. That were all up and down the river and it’s tributary’s. We must make it like it was before. We can use alligator from other states to repopulate the region. 72.200.169.67 (talk) 23:38, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The American alligator use to thrive in the REO grand river . Why don’t we repopulate the endangered animals again. We could use alligators from other states to repopulate the region. The American alligator had lived in all the the Rivers tributaries. I say repopulate our endangered animals.