lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:First Harvest 1984–92

message: I've updated the tracklisting for this release to be more explicit about which tracks are 7" versions, which are album versions, and which are something else, as this is the kind of information that I think is useful to fans who are trying to figure out what they have or what they might buy.
I listed the 'A Victory of Love' song as a 'new single version,' as the version is markedly different from the original album version. Since 'AVOL' was never released as a single or b-side on its own (that I know of), I have called it 'new,' and since it's not an extended or remixed version, I've called it a 'single.' I have no way to verify when the track was updated, but it is clearly not the same as the album track (notice the addition of the backing/acoustic guitar).
Does anyone have more information about this track (how/when it was re-recorded or re-mixed)?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87Fan (talk • contribs) 20:49, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tracklisting
Talk:First Utterance

message: Since it's user-generated, it's not really appropriate for inclusion as a citation.--h i s   s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 15:26, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rate Your Music is not a reliable source
Talk:Floating World (Anathallo album)

message: I added a link to the Vicks commercial. SenorPsychotique (talk) 20:48, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: How can an album about the Floating World be the main article. Shouldn't a description of what the floating world is be at this location? The album article should be moved to Floating_World_(album). Tritium6 (talk) 19:27, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Main "Floating World" article?
Talk:Flock (Bell X1 album)

message: Bell X1 Flock Album Review at WERS.org --candle•wicke 13:05, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taken from Bell X1 External Links section
Talk:Euchambersia

message: What is it's weight and size?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.56.121.52 (talk) 13:15, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anyone? 

message: This article now has the dubious distinction of being quoted by Dave Peters... Lythronaxargestes (talk | contribs) 18:30, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Hehe, what did he say? FunkMonk (talk) 21:18, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Peters quoted the section on Chambers' work being "a very remarkable work though sneered at by many". Gee, I wonder what he's trying to get at... real subtle. Lythronaxargestes (talk | contribs) 22:18, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elsewhere on the web 

message: Good morning or good evening. I am, at the moment when I make this request, in the process of formatting the French article based on Euchambersia in order to obtain a labeling in the same way as this article in English. While doing my translations, I noticed an ambiguity, even a possible contradiction, which I will put below (Chapter "Teeth"):
- Its fourth incisor also has a replacement tooth growing behind it, accompanied by resorption of the root.
-But further down they say this : both skulls of Euchambersia show no sign of any replacement teeth developing, suggesting that Euchambersia was reliant on having both canines present and functional simultaneously.
Knowing that these two statements are confirmed by the same sources, it only makes these contradictions even more incomprehensible, I hope to get explanatory answers.Amirani1746 (talk) 22:05, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no contradiction, that was poorly-written prose on my part. In the latter case, what is meant that the canine had no replacement tooth for it, as in the source: "The mesial surface of the left canine is eroded, resembling the type of etching that occurs during resorption of a functional tooth by a developing replacement tooth; however, no replacement tooth is preserved in association with the functional canine." Lythronaxargestes (talk | contribs) 22:10, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible contradiction ?
Talk:Central League (England)

message: The Central League  is the official name, like The Football League and The Football Association, see official website. Mousega (talk) 16:02, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If you'd bothered reading the content of the speedy deletion tag, you would see that this was placed so that the article could be properly moved to this title while preserving the page history - something which you broke by cutting-and-pasting the article content from Central League (football) without doing a proper page move. In future, don't move articles like that. I expect you to replace the speedy tag now so that the page histories can be merged by an admin. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 16:24, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: The Central League

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure) BegbertBiggs (talk) 14:00, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The Central League →  – Ambiguous title.  WP:THE. 162 etc. (talk) 04:41, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 5 October 2023
Talk:Follow the City Lights

message: This is an automated message regarding an image used on this page. The image :File:2006. Follow The City Lights.jpg, found on :Follow the City Lights, has been nominated for deletion because it does not meet Wikipedia image policy. Please see the image description page for more details. If this message was sent in error (that is, the image is not up for deletion, or was left on the wrong talk page), please contact this bot's operator.  STBotI (talk) 18:10, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: An image on this page may be deleted
Talk:David Fairchild

message: I don't know whether it is vandalism or ignorance that underlies the claim Fairchild introduced horseradish to the U.S., but it is simply not true. Perhaps someone more knowledgeable about the other plants mentioned in the lede, will take a look at whether Fairchild introduced any of the plants mentioned there.
Before Fairchild was even born, horseradish was grown commercially in the St. Louis area, principally in and around Collinsville, across the river from the city of St. Louis. Doubtless it also had been grown in the U.S. much earlier than that. See the Wikipedia article on horseradish, and/or one of its references: http://www.motherearthnews.com/Organic-Gardening/2003-10-01/Horseradish.aspx . Publius3 (talk) 01:41, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  horseradish 

message: The lede also said Fairchild introduced alfalfa into the U.S. This is not true. Alfalfa was grown in Oklahoma by 1850. See for instance http://alfalfa.okstate.edu/webnews/mar0697.htm . Publius3 (talk) 02:24, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  alfalfa 

message: I see now that I may have overlooked the intended meaning of the lede, while reading it somewhat hastily. Perhaps the intended meaning is that Fairchild introduced some particular variety of horseradish, or of alfalfa, into the U.S. If so, perhaps someone who knows the subject matter will reword the lede to distinguish between plants he introduced, and _new_varieties_of_plants_ he introduced. 
In support of any such assertions , references would be helpful. Publius3 (talk) 02:33, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  too hasty? 

message: Publius3 - I see you have an interest in exactly what plants Fairchild introduced.  That's great!  The problem is that it is complicated. There may have been five varieties of wheat growing here.  His guys brought back an additional fifteen varieties.  Two of them caught on and now represent 40% of the current crop.  I just made up these numbers, but you get the idea. I will make an effort to document this article better with verifiable references. GroveGuy (talk) 06:47, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  plant introduction 
Talk:For Adults Only

message: With only one cite, I was wondering how this article got the okay to be published? I had another editor tell me that an album article should not be published based on the notability of the artist themselves, but on the notability of the album itself. I actually come down on the side of all albums by a notable artist should be published, but was told that was not consistent with Wiki policy. Thanks for any light one can shine on the subject. THX1136 (talk) 00:40, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article question
Talk:Southern Tagalog

message: I have removed the 'former country'-related categories, because it seemed quite strange that this wouldn't be mentioned in the article itself, and I wonder if they were a mistake.  Could this be a confusion with Katagalugan?  Please excuse me if I'm wrong on this.--Pharos 18:44, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Former country?

message: Shouldn't this be "Quezon province was the designated regional center of Southern Tagalog."  Quezon City is part of NCR (National Capital Region) not Region-IV.  Secondly, when the majority of NCR was still part of the province of Rizal, the Quezon City that we know today wasn't a city yet. --- Laibcoms (talk | Contribs) 14:17, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Quezon City existed as a city long before Metro Manila was formed. In addition, Quezon City used to be the capital of the Philippines from 1948-1976 so it'a logical that it was also the regional center for Southern Tagalog. --seav (talk) 05:17, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Quezon City was the designated regional center of Southern Tagalog.
Talk:Brighton, Hove & District Football League

message: This league is a feeder to the Sussex County League Division Three, which is a level 11 (or Step7) league of the English football league system. Then, how can it be a level 11 league as well? --Siva1979Talk to me 07:01, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's one of the anomalies of the system - the Sussex County Div 3 is at Step 7, while the top division of all the local Sussex leagues also have Step 7 status. - fchd 17:22, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I wonder if the English FA knows about this anomaly. If so, I feel that they should look into this in the near future. It is indeed a puzzling anomaly which is quite difficult to comprehend. --Siva1979Talk to me 13:51, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  A contradiction?
Talk:Fotia (album)

message: This article is one in a series that has been subjected to disruptive editing for several months. Accordingly, it has been semi-protected for a like term. Logged in contributors who have been autoconfirmed are still able to edit the article. If you are not registered or autoconfirmed, you can still request that an edit be made to this article at this talk page. If the talk page is not active, you can place  (brackets and all) next to your suggestion, and another editor will soon review your request. See Wikipedia:Protection policy for more information. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:26, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article protected
Talk:HMS Marlborough

message: During the second world war Eastbourne College was used as a RN base bearing the same name. Should this be included here?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.189.60.1 (talk • contribs) 09:31, 9 March 2007
:yes.GraemeLeggett 14:43, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  RN base included?
Talk:Frampton (album)

message: Am I the only one seeing this? Maybe someone should check it, I don't really feel like it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by SomeGuy11112 (talk • contribs) 19:39, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 37:76?

message: I've once again removed the multiple wikilinks in the personnel section as per WP:SONG. Could I ask that they are not put back please - some of them led to disambiguation pages anyway. Thanks Witchwooder (talk) 08:08, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multiple wikilinks to instruments in personnel section
Talk:ERT1

message: I think that some parts of ERT 1, including the history of the network, should be moved into a new article to keep the article about the current channel relevant and up to date. The same should take place for ERT 2 and ERT 3 Also, the official notation of the TV channels are ERT 1, ERT 2 and ERT 3: i.e. a space between the initials and the number, also partly due to the separation of the main logo and channel identifier. --Marianian(talk) 19:42, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move portions suggestion 

message: Per the reference for the European Curia, I have changed the transliterated spelling of Tileorasi to "Tileorassi", other considerable googlable references indicate this spelling is used.  What does the Fish say? | Woof!  12:14, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transliterated spelling
Talk:Hopkinsville High School

message: Note that any unimportant information will be deleted. This includes any slander against the school, any sports record that isn't significant enough to gain any major attention and false information. Zellthemedic (talk) 14:21, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unimportant information 

message: Was the school segregated? FloridaArmy (talk) 15:27, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: History
Talk:Alter Channel

message: The section on the workers occupation is very poorly translated and makes hardly any sense at all.  Someone should look at this.  If I can find the original Greek version on Wikipedia, (if it exists), I will clean it up. kritikos99 (talk) 10:28, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation needs work 

message: Query RE: The following section under “history”: 
“April 2012 – Plans to reopen the channel began, with finance believed to be by Jewish, French and Turkish investors.” 
Seems strange that “Jewish” is selected as the identifier here amongst nationalities - possible translation issue? Should this read Israeli? 
Probably could use a citation too, to separate from gossip/rumour. Goosecheese (talk) 08:55, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source text re “Jewish” investors?
Talk:From Beale Street to Oblivion

message: Hello,
Track Seven is not called "One Eyed Dollar." There is no "d" on the "Eye." This is held up by a cursory examination of the back of the jewel case, as well as the lyric sheet. Please stop calling the song "One Eyed Dollar." kthxbye 128.192.128.101 14:28, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've got a down right confusion in this case. I see what are the similarities with Fred's Worried Life Blues. But how about Big Maceo's ″Worried Life Blues″? Is ″Worried Life Blues″ by both Big Maceo Merriweather and Mississippi Fred McDowell? Or did one of them come first? (Big Maceo's song also performed by Bill Gaither.) There's also ″Someday Baby Blues″ by Sleepy John Estes, and all of these seem to have something in common what it comes to lyrics or composing or both. It may be a folk song given bits here and there, evolving artist by artist. --El Rayno (talk) 12:44, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fred's Warried Life Blues vs. Big Maceo Worried Life Blues vs. Someday Baby Blues
Talk:MAD TV (TV channel)

message: I hope it's ok that i took the liberty of changing two last names!--Goldimit 14:10, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: VJs' Names
Talk:Full Service No Waiting

message: There are multiple Andrew Williams (disambiguation).
Several of them are musicians.  I didn't know, for sure, whether
the Andrew Williams listed on this page was one of those musicians -- or whether it is yet another musician.  I considered disambiguating it to Andrew Williams (musician).  But, in the end, I piped it to Andrew Williams (disambiguation).  Not ideal.  Maybe not even a good idea.
If anyone who works on this article knows that this guy is the drummer, they should change the pipe accordingly.
Cheers!  Geo Swan (talk) 15:59, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  disambiguation 
Talk:Loaded: Fully Loaded Edition

message: There's no reason for reissues to have separate pages, everything from this article should be incorporated to the article about the original album. Funkynusayri 14:29, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with the real [[Loaded (album)]] page
Talk:Fuzzy Warbles Volume 6

message: Should we give a mention of these albums containing demos of his unused work on James and the Giant Peach? 76.175.113.248 (talk) 01:39, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  James and the Giant Peach?
Talk:Aëtius of Antioch

message: The POV tag recently added says "see the discussion on the talk page".  But there is no such discussion.  What exactly seems to be the POV problem?  His surname "the Atheist" was tagged as POV; obviously that name was attached to him by his enemies -- the article is not claiming that he was an atheist.  Similarly, the POV tag after "the first to introduce the doctrine that the Father and the Only Begotten Son do not share the same divine substance." is unclear.  Is it questioning that he is the first?  (not really a POV issue) That he held this doctrine? (that's what our sources say) That that doctrine is true? (not for us to decide). Please clarify. --Macrakis 14:48, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't find any such reference in Against Eunomius. Also, IIRC, Basil and Philostorgius present different versions of Aetius' origins.Jacob Haller 18:00, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: POV and source tags

message: Basil gives his version of Aetius' biography in Against Eunomius, book 1, chapter 6 and cites personal conversation with Athanasius. Athanasius cites a letter by George of Laodicea, though I have not checked Athanasius' written works for this.
# Aetius originally serf or slave in vinyard.
# escapes (?)
# Aetius works as tinker. (Basil scoffs at his poverty).
# Story of the fake jewelry. (i.e. allegation that Aetius was capable of fair-seeming fraud)
# Aetius works as doctor's assistant, doctor, studies medicine.
# Aetius encounters Arian controversy.
# Aetius with Theophilus, Gallus, George, and then Eunomius. Jacob Haller 18:17, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Biography

message: The 1st Synod of Sirmium was, according to Council of Sirmium in 347, not after 350. Jacob Haller 15:52, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Contradiction
Talk:Garden Party (album)

message: I have a Rick Nelson Album by this same name on cassette tape, but it seems to be a different album from the one this article refers to. The album I have, although it has the exact same title, has a completely different track listing, with many songs that do not even appear on the one described here. In fact, it seems to be some sort of compilation album, as there is a small note printed on the back reading "This cassette contains previously released material". I got it from a book sale at my local library a just a few weeks ago, so I'm not sure, but as far as I can tell it was released in 1987 by MCA Records. The track listing is: 1. Garden Party 2. Fools Rush In 3. That's All She Wrote 4. She Belongs to Me 5. A Happy Guy 6. I'm Called Lonely 7. There's Nothing I Can Say 8. The Very Thought of You. The cover is the "1966 promotional picture" of Nelson shown in the "Rick Nelson" Wikipedia article. If someone wants to do a little research and maybe include a section in this article about that album, that would be great.104.12.60.211 (talk) 22:26, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Compilation Album With The Same Name?
Talk:Mills Observatory

message: The information and sources includes talking with the curator and astronomer Dr. Bill Samson, at the Mills Observatory, pamphlets and various leaflets and books available at the Observatory. Dr. Samson provided a lot of information, including Thomas Flood's Historical Survey and images for the use of Wikipedia. I will update the Sources list sooner.--Cyril Thomas 16:50, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Dr. William Samson, curator and astronomer at the Mills Observatory offered abundant information by presenting documents, talks, emails and images of Mills Observatory. Robert Law, at the Mills Observatory also provided a lot of information for this article.--Cyril Thomas 14:07, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Presentations 

message: At first glance, this article is almost "Complete". It just needs additional references. So for now, I set class to "Start". JoeNMLC (talk) 15:48, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment
Talk:Garth Brooks & the Magic of Christmas

message: I've previously noticed that the three songs from this album that were not included on Songs from Call Me Claus are songs that were on Garth's previous Christmas album, Beyond the Season. I never got around to picking up either Magic or Claus, so I can't check for myself, but I've always wondered whether these three songs on Magic are the same tracks from Season or if they're new recordings. If they're the same tracks, then that essentially makes Claus an upgraded replacement for Magic with three new tracks replacing three previously released tracks. I've always suspected this to be the case, considering the otherwise identical tracks and identical album cover photos. I would consider that a significant difference from the scenario currently described in the Magic and Claus articles, which imply they're two separate albums that mostly have the same content aside from three tracks unique to each. The articles may currently be technically correct, but I believe it would be worth noting if this is the case. Can anyone clarify this? 
I'll cross post this to the Claus discussion page as well. --Teratron (talk) 20:56, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tracks not carried over to ''Songs from Call Me Claus'' 
Talk:Garth Brooks in...the Life of Chris Gaines

message: According to the article title it is called "Greatest Hits", but everywhere within the article it is referred to as "Garth Brooks in... The Life of Chris Gaines".... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:49, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  So what is this album actually called?
Talk:Araldite

message: Also, how long does it take for the different versions of Araldite to set or to reach full strength?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.26.212.188 (talk) 13:42, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Actually, Araldite was invented at this "ARL":
Aero Research Ltd.
Founded in 1934 by Dr. Norman de Bruyne, a physicist/engineer and don at Cambridge University, Aero Research Ltd. (Duxford, England) pioneers new applications in aircraft adhesives and impregnated fabrics. Among the company's many advances are its Aerolite, Araldite and Redux® adhesives, its Aeroweb honeycomb core, its Fiberdux glass fiber epoxy Prepregs and its Fibrelam® panels. Aero Research Ltd. is acquired by Ciba in 1947.
From here:  Ian Dunster 14:50, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: BTW, that's also how it got its name; ARaLdite  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.40.250.209 (talk) 09:22, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

text: ARL was sold to Ciba-Geigy in 1947 so I suspect the Araldite 'whetted CG's appetite' in 1945 and they then bought the company.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.112.82.103 (talk) 11:14, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: There's a picture of a 1945 carton and tubes of Araldite resin and hardener, here:   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.112.84.240 (talk) 16:25, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for the view! I liked it: two tubes. Alas, we I don't think we can use that pic here, because of commercial rights and so. Or is it you want to improve the first-date-thing? It must be around 1945 for sure. -DePiep (talk)
I am hoping to update the content once i understand why it isn't allowing me to save changes.Allaboutglue (talk) 14:40, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Araldite origins

message: eg Strengths, hardness, viscosity before curing, max temp ... ? - Rod57 (talk) 05:34, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need properties - Strengths, hardness etc 