lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Gageo Reef

message: Some of you currently appear to be engaged in an edit war regarding the name of the reef that some call Gageo Reef‎ and others call Rixiang Reef. Please use the articles' talk pages to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Thank you.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 21:50, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit war 

message: I'm not sure how this is notable.  The only reason I found it was by tracking Bason0's sockpuppetry.  As the article is written, I don't see how its notable for inclusion at all.  The article shows no historic or political importance and cites no sources.  Are we to include every single submerged rock in the world?  That list would number in the hundreds of thousands!  Basically, there's no reason to include this unless there's something important about it that's not listed here.  If there is, please include it and reference it.  I've put this on my watch page.  If not expanded by December, I'll nominate it for deletion.  --Jdcaust (talk) 23:13, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: I just took out some pro-Korean POV pushing. If this article were not up for AfD, I'd suggest reverting out the November 2007 changes, which originally came from the sockpuppet of a banned user. • Gene93k (talk) 23:48, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This reef incorporated south korea already. When korea incorporated this reef, PRC goverment did not official protest to this. also this reef first found by Japanese ship, when Korea under Japanese rule. China didn't claim this reef was their. (also China never occupied this reef) and S.Korea incorporated behavior obeyed international law and the international law of the sea. Korea and China have not territorial dispute this reef.  Chinese goverment never protest to this. some ultra nationalistic chinese want make territorial dispute. and want change reef name to their own will. cleary, Rixiang Reef name is Pro-China POV pushing. if you think "Are we to include every single submerged rock in the world?  That list would number in the hundreds of thousands!" ok. then, Rixiang Reef also need delete, too. by the international law, official name of This reef is Gageo reef. Midum (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 09:14, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  December 2007 
Talk:Chi (Chobits)

message: The Freya section should be shortened a little, I think, and a link to the character page added instead of repeating all of the information here.PiccoloNamek (talk) 21:55, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: By link do you mean List of Chobits characters#Freya? MelicansMatkin (talk) 22:31, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

text: Okay, I've shortened the section and added the link. MelicansMatkin (talk) 02:29, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Freya

message: CHI is an acyronym for Computer-human interaction look it up, just hought someone shoud mention it  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.68.250.93 (talk) 00:45, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have a reliable source for this? C.H.I. is undoubtedly an acronym for many other things. MelicansMatkin (talk) 16:40, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

text: That belongs on the Chi disambiguation page, not here. -AngusWOOF (talk) 00:19, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

text: I doubt that is relevant to her naming in universe, as her name was originally Freya and the Japanese is Chii. Incidentally the Wikipedia entry, Chii redirects here to Chi. 03:46, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Acronym

message: *(Book Cite)
*All of the sourcing for the in universe bit can be done but will take more time, I have the complete manga/anime series but will have to read through it to cite the pages and episodes to make sure it is not just some made up nonsense. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 18:08, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Some sources

message: Well I found myself re-reading Chobits to find the sources needed for the in-universe information, once complete it should look better. I figure it will take me a few days to read through the series once I do I can try to add some out of universe information involving the plot. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 00:47, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Book sources
Talk:Jalapeño popper

message: The current article for jalapeno poppers only covers the deep fried variety, found mostly in grocery store frozen aisles and bar menus. It is missing the grilled and/or baked bacon wrapped iteration, popular throughout Texas and much of the southwest, like so: http://www.instructables.com/id/Texas-Jalapeno-Poppers/
I have reason to believe that the grilled bacon wrapped poppers are the original version, and that the deep fried is a simplified version for mass production. At the least, both iterations deserve mention in this article.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by Poppinoff247 (talk • contribs) 04:10, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this article incomplete?

message: it must be noted that the Terms 'jalapeno popper' and 'armadillo egg' arent to be used interchangably. the term 'armadillo egg' refers to a halfshell jalapeno stuffed with cream cheese coil wrapped in bacon and baked. a 'jalapeno popper' is a full shell jalapeno stuffed with cream cheese, sometimes sausage or bacon pieces and then battered and fried. An easy way to remember which is which is by using the word 'popper' and applying it to fishing terms. a popper is a type of lure. when side by side. the jalapeno and the lure look similar in design and shape. on the same note you can look at an armadillo and notice how its overlapping shell is similar to that of the overlapped bacon. i do hope you add this small notation at the top of the page and perhaps make a separate article for it. if i bake a pie and call it a cake.... i am grammatically wrong. if someone makes jalapeno poppers and calls them armadillo eggs..... they are grammatically wrong. please consider these changes.  - by 72.175.87.209 found here :https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jalape%C3%B1o_popper&oldid=874085798
:This is original research that needs a source for it to be on Wikipedia; The Fishing popper portion may very well be correct, I just haven't found a source for it yet. The bacon (or sausage) portion being like an armadillo shell is also likely correct but needs a source, which I am looking for. The proscriptive usage regarding 'jalapeno popper' does not appear to conform to how the term is actually used with grilled jalapeno poppers being as commonly used as fried jalapeno poppers. Falconjh (talk) 22:17, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  An Edit that per the content should have been to the talk page.
Talk:List of Hindi films of 2008

message: Release dates are important. It will tell if the film is released in January or December of 2008. Since table is sortable it will be sortable retrospectively. Courts noble (talk) 09:38, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No they are not needed, definitely not. Shahid • Talk2me 12:51, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: why not? Courts noble (talk) 07:09, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: this is a list of films that are released in 2008. I had taken them from target articles. Shahid reverting my hard work, without courtesy of posting a reply here. What do you lose if we include release dates without which the list is of hardly any use. 195.189.142.168 (talk) 17:22, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't "revert your hard work". It's great that you're working on it, but please do not include release dates, because it's improper format for these kinds of lists. These lists are listed and ordered alphabetically. Shahid • Talk2me 18:07, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

text: 2008 is different as some of the films are unreleased. I personally would not object to anywbody adding release dates as long as they are referenced. In fact when I initially created the film lists we debated whether or not to cinlude release dates for all. In the end we decided against as it clutters the tables.
Most of all I want the lists to be consistent and if somebody starts adding release dates to 2008 they'll start doing it to the others and before you know it all of the other lists will be plagued with unreferenced dates and the works.  Really with Indian film I had intended the last column to be for the Playback singers/composers of the films -music is particularly important for Bollywood especially I think. I would suggest a special section underneath for up and commuing film release dates -this way it doesn't mess up the table but if anybody adds any unreferenced or unreliably sourced dates they should quite rightly be reverted.
  ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦      $1,000,000?  20:10, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

text: Since the table is sortable, it would be of great value if release dates are added. We will know what are the movies currently running on theaters. Also what are the films to be released soon / next week, this info is not available in net in a single place, but it can be made available in wiki. Also only drawback suggested is it would clutter, does it really do? Courts noble (talk) 06:16, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

text: Also as for source, imdb link mentioned below has release dates for every movie. Thanks. Courts noble (talk) 04:06, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  release dates
Talk:Chrysler (brand)

message: A new logo is needed because it changed for the 2011 models  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aikidockd (talk • contribs) 06:09, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  logo 

message: I question this statement:
"Chrysler is an American luxury car brand and the longstanding premium marque of automaker FCA US LLC."
Makes is read like it was done by Chrysler themselves or someone paid by them to write this statement.
I would suggest this be edited to seem more generic or removed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 153.2.246.33 (talk) 15:10, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  First Line of entry 

message: Maybe it would be excessive and make the section too long, but surely the near collapse, Iaccoca and then rapid growth would be worth noting? Maybe not Tdp2612 (talk) 19:51, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that this page is incomplete, however, I believe that such information is present in, and belongs in the article on Chrysler, the overarching company that sold vehicles under an eponymous brand. I do think the incompleteness of this article should be drawn to attention. QuadraticEquation 20:13, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  History section
Talk:Chrysler Newport

message: There are images on Flickr which could replace this non-free content. There's a 62 and a 61. Angus McLellan  (Talk) 23:28, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [[:File:ChryslerNewport1963.jpg]] is not free but is replaceable
Talk:Some Other Guy

message: To say that Goose Step Mamma is “based on” the Beatles’ version is to open a can of worms which probably needs to be closed. It would be better put that, in the course of the original spoof documentary programme, it performs the function of Some Other Guy, given that it plays over footage designed to look like the Granada recording of The Beatles at The Cavern. This would remove any implication that Neil Innes plagiarised or even parodied the original work in his song, something that he was careful not to do (he has said that he didn’t listen to Beatles recordings prior to writing new material or adapting existing material of his own (as was the case with Blue Suede Schubert)). Innes’s song is in effect a song in the same idiom and style, rather than a parody.Jock123 (talk) 08:38, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rutles song… 

message: My understanding is that The Big Three are so named; the "The" is part of their title and so needs a capital "T" (see: http://www.merseybeatnostalgia.co.uk/html/the_big_three.html ) It's not like "the Beatles" or "the Rolling Stones", where the definite article is simply a part of speech. Arrivisto (talk) 17:41, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: It's just a convention, with no recognised exceptions (unlike e.g. The Hague). Meaning doesn't enter into it. Rothorpe (talk) 18:04, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Big Three
Talk:Sýn 2

message: This page is just telling people what Sýn 2 is. This page is just like pages that describe what fox, nbc, abc,ect. are. There is no reason to delete this page. It is not advertising anything.
:No need for the pricing information then. I will delete it. Harry was a white dog with black spots (talk) 10:01, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Sacral dimple

message: But please leave it anyway, until the article is fleshed out a bit more -- a little levity now and then is a good thing.drh (talk) 12:42, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not sure about that last paragraph 

message: As a researcher involved with sacral dimples and other cutaneous lesions, this article is in need of some help.  I'll be able to start fixing it in the near future (within a month).  This page is probably not too popular anyway. Link465 (talk) 19:28, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is mostly incorrect 

message: "There is another use for the term "Dimples of Venus" in surgical anatomy. These are two symmetrical indentations on the posterior aspect of the  sacrum which also contain a venous channel. They are used as a landmark for finding the superior articular facets of the sacrum as a guide to place sacral pedicle screws in spine surgery.Youmans Neurological Surgery; 5th ed., 2004"--from Dimples of Venus. Are these something different from the sacral dimples?
--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 14:55, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Dimples of Venus"  

message: It is possible to image this malformation without indecent exposure. 37.248.171.42 (talk) 20:47, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes I agree, at least crop it. 2605:59C8:71:E110:FD95:7C92:CCF7:8C3B (talk) 02:13, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inappropriate picture
Talk:Ivan Ilchev

message: Why do you think that Ivan Ilchev is not important enough to have his own page in Wikipedia? He is rector of the country's big university. Please note that this is the first page I create in Wikipedia, and I don't know exactly how I should do it. I'll be very happy if someone experienced helps me and explains me where I'm wrong, instead of putting my page for speedy deletion.
:Each claim you make about this person should have a separate, third-party source (not the subject's own autobiography). It should also be neutral in tone, avoiding words like "most respected". This whole sentence should be deleted: "Ivan Ilchev is a very open minded person, well known for his wide point of view, as far as history (or science at all) is concerned. He also has a good sense of humor. Always in doubt about if history in books have been manipulated over the years, he gets the essence and provides a multi source version of history, usually rejecting the official one partially or entirely."
:There is a note to provide sources. Please do this as quickly as possible. If you don't know how, ask on this page. If the article is not sourced properly it could become a candidate for deletion again. Harry was a white dog with black spots (talk) 10:07, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As I suspected. It is not considered proper to write pages on oneself or on people one knows personally. Wikipedia is not a place for "tributes" to one's friends or mentors. Harry was a white dog with black spots (talk) 15:21, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mitsubishi HSR

message: There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is www.team.net. Thank you. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 02:38, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Notice of Reliable Sources Noticeboard discussion
Talk:Bradford Dukes

message: Proposed merger with Bradford Dukes would be wrong, as Halifax Dukes became Bradford Dukes and so were actually a completely different club to any of the other Bradfords. There is a case for merging the other Bradford/Odsall teams in the cases where just the name changed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by NattyBooshka (talk • contribs) 16:40, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
Talk:HIV/AIDS in Latin America

message: Garcia-Abreu, Anabela, et al. HIV/AIDS in Latin America : The Challenges Ahead, World Bank Publications, 2003. ProQuest Ebook Central, https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/yale-ebooks/detail.action?docID=3050641.
Soto-Ramírez, Luis E. “HIV/AIDS in Latin America.” Science, American Association for the Advancement of Science, 25 July 2008, science.sciencemag.org/content/321/5888/465
Stonbraker, Samantha, and Elaine Larson. “Health-Information Needs of HIV-Positive Adults in Latin America and the Caribbean: An Integrative Review of the Literature.” AIDS care 28.10 (2016): 1223–1229. PMC. Web. 24 Oct. 2017 Trumbull27 (talk) 16:26, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible References/Bibliography 

message: I have considered your additions to this post, however to provide more thorough information on this subject, it may be best to start from scratch, as this article is only two sentences with no headings or organization. A group of Wikipedians and I have decided to replace the current two sentences, and as this is not an in-depth article, it may be acceptable to post the new version of the article all at once. All sources are peer reviewed scientific journals, and established authorities on the subject. Wagnermj (talk) 01:00, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updated HIV/AIDS in Latin America Article
Talk:Jack Kerouac Alley

message: The street sign appears in the 1993 movie So I Married an Axe Murderer, at both the opening and end of the movie. The sign, all capital letters, says "Jack Kerouac" with "Adler" in smaller letters underneath (no parentheses as is shown in the picture currently attached to this article). On the top is mounted a smaller plate saying "End" - I do not know if what is shown in the movie is the actual sign from 1993 or a mock/set sign. Perhaps someone would be interested in verifying this and adding this reference to the article. At the time of writing, the movie is available for viewing on hulu.com; in this version the sign appears in two different shots, at 00:01:52 and at 01:29:18. Wiki4893 (talk) 00:53, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alley sign in movie 

message: Just an FYI, because I see images of these engravings so often when I search for Jack Kerouac Alley. I wonder if anyone would be interested in knowing some of the people who were involved with the redesign besides Lawrence Ferlinghetti even though we are not famous or well-known. Jasmine Kaw was the Landscape Architect for this redesign and I (Wendy A. Shanahan, artist) designed all the poems engraved in English in the road at Jack Kerouac Alley at the request of the San Francisco DPW, the Chinatown Community Development Center,and the owners of Vesuvios and City Lights Bookstore. These poem engravings were designed on Adobe InDesign in 2007 at 17 Jack Kerouac Alley. Wendshan (talk) 03:30, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alley Redesign 

message: I'm not "messing around" (as you said in your edit summary). Per Wikipedia:Image_use_policy#Displayed_image_size, "The lead image (appearing at the top of the page) should usually be no wider than upright=1.35 (which is the default equivalent of 300px at preference selection of "220px")." ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:54, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I went ahead and added an infobox, and put the image in there. ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:57, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: A stub article does not need an infobox. Beyond My Ken (talk) 22:11, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: There's very little point in having an image in an article if the reader can't "see" it at the size it's presented at.  We should never force a reader to have to click through just to see an image clearly.  If they want a better view, it's their choice to click through, and that's fine, but we should always serve our readers but presenting any information in an article -- text or visual -- in a way that makes it comprehensible to them. That's one of the many reasons that we have WP:IAR, so we don't get rule-bound.So, yes, you are "messing around" because you're foolishly following rules instead of think of what's best for the reader, and waht's best for the article.  Please stop it.  Beyond My Ken (talk) 22:16, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Whatever, then make the image bigger than necessary within the infobox. ---Another Believer (Talk) 22:17, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead image size
Talk:List of mammals of Newfoundland

message: Created this page rather than add category tagging to a large number of species pages where it probably isn't appropriate or is at least debatable.  Used the referenced Salmonier Nature Park link as a source, alphabetized the listings and linked them to the appropriate wiki pages.  Some of the information linked on the external page is out of date, with regards to the taxonmy classification names;  the list here reflects the current Wikipedia information.Vulcan's Forge (talk) 22:27, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:MG C-type

message: Does anyone know what superchargers were used on the C-type? Particularly, what was the standard(sic) fitment?  The Js and Ks used Powerplus as standard but sometimes switched to larger Arnott (vane) or Marshall (Roots) for racing. The text refs for the C usually suggest it's a Powerplus, but all the photos I've seen show a Marshall.  Andy Dingley (talk) 23:57, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Supercharger makers
Talk:Cradley Heathens

message: When I used to watch speedway when the Heathens were going, they were known as 'Cradley Heathens', not 'Cradley Heath Heathens'. Even their own adverts listed the team as 'Cradley "Heathens"' (e.g. I've found this in a 1978 Speedway Star with a Cradley Heath Speedway advert for 'Cradley "Heathens" versus Leicester "Lions"'). So, shouldn't this article be named 'Cradley Heathens'? --Michig (talk) 07:09, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: renamed. --Michig (talk) 07:40, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cradley Heathens 

message: I am proposing this now because Dudley Heathens have just been officially renamed Cradley Heathens, which was the name of the old club (despite the current title of this article). After the renaming we now have an old club and a new club with the same name, with sufficient link between the two (new club set up by people associated with the defunct club) to have all of the information in one article. Any views welcome. If there are no views expressed against it I'll merge in a week or so. Thanks. --Michig (talk) 19:47, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge completed. --Michig (talk) 07:40, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to merge [[Dudley Heathens]] and [[Cradley Heath Heathens]] into [[Cradley Heathens]]
Talk:Dawid Kujawa

message: A single reference on the page to a mention in "British Speedway Who's Who" isn't enough to establish notability, nor is there anything on the page that appears to meet WP:NSPORT. Please add references to the page before removing the notability tag. I don't speak Polish but I don't see a ton of results when I search. FuriouslySerene (talk) 14:47, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I think an editor who removes a notability tag needs to justify it by adding sources to the page or associated talk page. I would suggest you either fix the problem or leave the tag in place so someone else can try fixing it. FuriouslySerene (talk) 18:06, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability