lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Kendo Rage

message: By the way... Just happened to come across this entry. I am the original author of the webpage that is being linked to. I created that page several years ago, on the server of a friend of mine, but I had semi-abandoned the page and let it fall to ruin a bit, of which I regret.
I just would like to mention that indeed some of the information I have provided about the names of characters on my website is slightly wrong and I never got around to fixing the errors or actually finishing the site. The wikipedia article is correct, where I got things incorrect.
I've also learned much more about the game, and will be getting around to fixing and completing my webpage some day, as well as adding more information about Makeruna Makendo 2 and Makeruna Makendo Z. Both of which I have managed to get a working copy of.
Someday I hope to really get the page in working order again and possibly re-vamp the entire Kendo Rage/Makeruna Makendo page into something much better than it is now, seeing as it is possibly one of the only pages about the game on the internet that I am aware of.
So, just a quick apology for the state of that site, and the possibility of me fixing it and/or remaking it from scratch at the same url adress, better than before.
76.208.56.128 (talk) 11:47, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: Hello again. This is the author of the linked site, again. I have some bad news. There was a problem with the server that hosted said page, recently, and unfortunately the subdomains, including the one with that Kendo Rage webpage were wiped out. So, it appears i'll have to remove the link below this article as it no longer functions. 
But, I have since moved my focus to online video reviews of classic games, and next on my schedule is a Kendo Rage review, so if no one has any objections, I will likely be back here to replace this with a newly added link to the video review which will cover some of the same information found on the old page and much new and updated info about the game as well.
76.208.12.80 (talk) 22:42, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  
Talk:The Winner's Journey (Natalie Gauci album)

message: This album is important because it is the album which will be released by the winner of Australian Idol 2007. This album will likely be a number one album in the Australian Music Charts, the Aria Charts. See The Winner's Journey (Damien Leith album). Also, a similar case with the deletion 'review' of Here I Am (Natalie Gauci song) ended in a 'kept' result - I shall expand the article as new information emerges which should be (at latest), December 8 2007, just two weeks away. Hpfan9374 (talk) 12:09, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Contesting Wikipedia’s criteria for speedy deletion
Talk:C. J. Rogers

message: This is pasted from my talk page.
C. J. Rogers
Please do not create redirects to non-existent articles. (aeropagitica) 13:00, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't remember making this particular redirect. But I do see that Clifford Joy Rogers was deleted 3 days before you deleted the redirect and left this note. I think it's very unlikely that I did create a redirect to a non-existent article. --Gil Gamesh 23:19, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recreating redirect
Talk:Lippisch P.13a

message: How the hell did that design get such speed with such gigantically thick wings? AVKent882 (talk) 19:34, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This yet another "what if". The information in the article doesn't give us a lot to work from, other than that it had good stability into the M2.6 range. That is actually pretty meaningless. All it says is that it was tested that far. The wing thickness would have been a factor for critical drag rise and Mcrit. It also does not say what the rest of its characteristics were like. To fly supersonic would have required far more thrust than what that ramjet was capable of. Flanker235 (talk) 08:24, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems unlikely that Germany had a wind tunnel capable of simulating M2.6. You would need either a cryogenic tunnel, or a pretty impressive jet engine to get up to that sort of Mach number. The reference given is of low value: it just states stability at M2.6 without giving any references. Scottwh (talk) 12:41, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Is the XP-92 really a "variant" of the P.13a?  Some accounts claim Convair designed their plane and after encountering problems, they looked at Lippisch's work and consulted with him.  To me, the designs do not seem that similar, the P13 is stubby and very thick winged.  DonPMitchell (talk) 05:07, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  XP-92
Talk:2010 FIFA World Cup qualification – UEFA Group 2

message: The FIFA page link (the 'index' version) currently credits the goal to Golan, but that's been changed to Barda at various places around here (and there are actually a lot of them).  However, I think the rules are that a deflection like that counts as the final shot (FIFA has a whole list of 'rules' that are more commonly used in determining what is or isn't an own goal).  There's no point in changing it back yet, because the final match report will be the determinant of what will end up as the answer.  However, I suspect that the changes have been wasted effort. Jlsa (talk) 05:59, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Barda or Golan

message: For them to reach 13 points and qualify they will need to win their remaining games.  However, they will need the Swiss and Greeks to lose all their remaining games.  The Swiss play both Latvia and Israel.  If Latvia defeats the Swiss then they will also be on 13 points.  So, other than defeating the Swiss, Moldova needs Latvia to lose the rest of their remaining matches.  Latvia also plays Israel.  If Israel defeats both Latvia and the Swiss then they will be on 15 points, which is out of the reach of Moldova.  Also, Latvia plays Greece, so either way, two teams will be above 13 points at the end of the rounds.  Moldova cannot get more than 13 points. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.58.217.50 (talk) 14:09, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Not so.  If - MDA wins all, LUX wins all remaining, SUI wins all remaining (obviously in that order) and then ISR d LVA, and LVA d GRE the table would be
1. SUI 22. 2= MDA, GRE, LUX, LVA all 13, 6. ISR 12.  Highly unlikely, but still there. Moldova don't need BOTH the Swiss and Greeks to lose all, just one of them (in this case it's Greece) Jlsa (talk) 14:23, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Moldova has been eliminated

message: If they lose to Moldova and Luxembourg lose to Switzerland, they can only finish runner-up if Moldova win again and force Luxembourg to be last. This would cap their total at 9 adjusted points, so allowing every group runner-up to reach 10 would eliminate them. (If Luxembourg do not lose, however, it's possible for Moldova to finish last and then Israel would have 12 adjusted points, more than enough.) This requires:
*in Group 1: either Sweden do not lose, or Portugal and Hungary do not draw;
*in Group 3: either Slovenia or Czech Republic win;
*in Group 7: either of France or Serbia do not lose, or Austria win.
PiGuy314 (talk) 05:26, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible Israel elimination as worst runner-up 

message: isreal should be on 4 wins 3 draws, not 3 wins four draws. This is only incorrect in the table. The "match summary" is ok, i dont know how to edit it—Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.221.30.250 (talk • contribs) 10:27, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have corrected it. MTC (talk) 10:39, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  isreal win/draw count incorrect
Talk:2010 FIFA World Cup qualification – UEFA Group 4

message: I haven't found a full schedule yet, despite looking at some of online newspapers of other countries. But anyway, here's Finnish schedule:
2008
September 10, Finland vs. Germany
October 11, Finland vs. Azerbaijan
October 15, Russia vs. Finland
2009
March 28, Wales vs. Finland
June 6, Finland vs. Liechtenstein
June 10, Finland vs. Russia
September 5, Azerbaijan vs. Finland
September 9, Liechtenstein vs. Finland
October 10, Finland vs. Wales
October 14, Germany vs. Finland
BleuDXXXIV (talk) 11:41, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:2010 FIFA World Cup qualification – UEFA Group 5

message: Different reports.
* Official FIFA
* Estonian Federation
* Armenia Federation
	
What is the correct?
:We'll use the FIFA one in the end. Which one is correct is (sadly) less relevant. Jlsa (talk) 08:42, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Then , need chnage table goalscorers. (WildCherry06 (talk) 09:18, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Vassiljev and Zenjov were the scorers, as I've said in my edit summary, Saag wasn't even on the pitch when the second goal was scored. BanRay 11:14, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  FIFA correct report. Now it's ok. (WildCherry06 (talk) 11:29, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Armenia  	2 – 2 	 Estonia

message: It appears to be a little bit more complicated than suggested, as if they clinch second via a draw it would still be possible for Turkey (who Spain have already defeated twice) to finish last in the group, leaving Spain on 13 after removing those two results. No set of results can guarantee both Spain second with a draw and Turkey not last, since if Turkey win it means Armenia must also win to guarantee second for Spain:
*Spain draw with Belgium, lose the rest (19).
*Bosnia lose to Armenia, win the rest (21).
*Turkey defeat Estonia, lose the rest (11).
*Belgium draw with Spain and Armenia, defeat Turkey, lose to Estonia (12).
*Estonia lose to Turkey, defeat Spain, lose to Bosnia, defeat Belgium (11).
*Armenia defeat Bosnia, draw with Belgium, defeat Spain and Turkey (11).
That means that they would have to have a group where second could finish with no more than 12 in order to guarantee a playoff spot; the only way that can happen is in Group 9 (where Scotland would have to fail to defeat Norway, then draw with Macedonia). PiGuy314 (talk) 16:49, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Playoff scenarios for Spain
Talk:2010 FIFA World Cup qualification – UEFA Group 7

message: I don't think losing to France would eliminate Faroe Islands next match. They would be at 1 point with four matches to go, and France would be at 13. Faroe Islands could then catch France by winning out and France losing out. That would necessarily put Austria and Romania at 10 (since they would have to beat France), with Austria playing both Romania and Lithuania in further games. If those games both end in a draw and Serbia wins all of its games, Faroe Islands would be tied for second with France at 13 points and it would go to goal difference. (Austria would be at 12, Romania at 11, and Lithuania at 10.) I haven't checked to see if this would guarantee them the lowest total among second-place finishers (they would have 10, since Lithuania would have split with them), though - that might be enough to eliminate them. PiGuy314 (talk) 20:23, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Next match updates 

message: austria and faroe islands  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.152.214.2 (talk) 20:40, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  false GD 

message: Do I overlook something? I would say, Serbia have not ensured 2nd place yet.
In case that
* Austria wins all 3 matches
* France wins 2 of their 3 matches (all except against Austria)
* Serbia loses all their 3 matches
the final table would be:
* 1 France: 14 + 6 = 20
* 2 Austria: 10 + 9 = 19
* 3 Serbia: still at 18
--DeTru711 (talk) 21:47, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Serbia have ensured at least 2nd place. 

message: Sorry shouldn't Serbia play Lithuania on Oct 10th or 14 th???
--Genius82 (talk) 14:56, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: They do, on the 14th. Why do you ask? -- Jokes Free4Me (talk) 17:26, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Serbia to play Romania?? 
Talk:2010 FIFA World Cup qualification – UEFA Group 9

message: I can't find any source saying that the time table will be decided on December 14th. Where did that info come from?
24.237.218.205 (talk) 03:46, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: time table

message: If I'm right Dutch can reach World Cup if they win against Macedonia AND Scotland and Iceland draw. --Simy69 (talk) 14:59, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I was wrong. I didn't count with Norway :). Sorry for that --Simy69 (talk) 15:02, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Netherlands can qualify on 1 April 

message: I don't know how to edit the actual table, but it shows Norway having played 5 games when they have only played four and should be adjusted.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.248.27.143 (talk) 20:34, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I know that needs to be changed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.10.100.179 (talk) 20:44, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Table is incorrect 
Talk:Tux, of Math Command

message: noob here. but should   go at the top or the bottom of the page?
:They go on the top. --AB (talk) 09:47, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Placement of "notability" and "sources" templates 

message: TuxMath does not start on OSX Lion. To resolve this add:
fullscreen = 0
as the last entry in the file tuxmath/contents/resources/missions/options  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.57.68.16 (talk) 03:02, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  TuxMath not responding on Mac OSX 10.7 Lion
Talk:Patti Reid

message: Singers who've released two CDs are usually thought notable on Wikipedia. Reid has done this and has been active on the British folk scene for two decades.  Nick mallory (talk) 12:56, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 
Talk:St. Johnsbury Athenaeum

message: No one seems to number the people holding the name John Davis Hatch. One popped up in a gift http://www.nps.gov/miss/historyculture/upload/River_Ch_1.pdf. Assuming the interviews online are with the V, that would make his grandfather the III. Maybe. Student7 (talk) 13:07, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Architect
Talk:Solitaire (Neil Sedaka album)

message: "...marked the comeback of Sedaka after a 10-year absence from the charts."
Does this mean, "from the BRITISH charts."  Because the Emergence album was released the Year before.
albabe - The Writer/Artist Formally  Known as Al Gordon 17:36, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this wrong?
Talk:Film and Television Institute of India

message: Where is the original article? It was well-written. Where did it disappear? Thanks.Kanchanamala (talk) 10:30, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Original Article

message: Its Art of written communication between people to authour,
I always write lost of comment now a day i'm writing a flim script
so plz provide help me
call me on 9860157699  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.246.216.68 (talk) 08:08, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Script Writing is Art 

message: Plz tell me that which is the first tv in india and also tell me that in which year did it was launched? 103.39.247.147 (talk) 14:40, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  First T●V● in India
Talk:Irish (Junior Cert)

message: --The.Q(t)(c) 13:14, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikify-ing

message: I'm sure that the criticism of the Irish language at Junior Cert level exists, but I don't know too much about it.  Can anyone expand upon it?  I've tried to tidy it up, but defenitely much more work is needed, there's a tendency to WP:POV, I think. --The.Q(t)(c) 16:22, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  criticism
Talk:Napoleon's planned invasion of the United Kingdom

message: Nice subject and looking good Victuallers (talk) 23:41, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Can we please find out what he intended to do when he invaded?  First, although it says what preperations the British and French made, do we know where Napoleon actually intended to land?  Do we know where he might have travelled to, which cities he intended to take?  Did he intend to take London?  All of England?  All of Britain?  What was his motive/what did he intend to acheive, specifically, by doing this?
Also, if he had invaded with his 200, 000 men, is there any recorded oppinion as to whether he might have succeeded?
IceDragon64 (talk) 00:04, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The external link might prove helpful.--Johnbull (talk) 18:32, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intentions? 

message: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Fishguard --- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L%C3%A9gion_Noire --- etc
I think that you ought to have some reference to 1797 on this page : the expedition to Ireland failed ; the expedition to England sailed along the east coast and did not try to land ; the expedition to the Severn Sea was supposed to sack Bristol and then disembark at Cogan near Cardiff and march to Merthyr Tydfil to put the ironworks out of action but eventually landed in a precarious place presumeably with the help of a local man.
Please excuse me for not writing on the page but only putting down this note - searching for the flag carried by La Seconde Légion des Francs. DaiSaw (talk) 12:00, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Carregwasted Invasion & The Surrender at Fishguard of La Seconde Légion des Francs 
Talk:Puppet (software)

message: ==Untitled==
I've just created this page because there were too many external links on the Comparison of open source configuration management software page, and because it merited one on its own.
In keeping with Wiki policy, I don't work on the project; I work on one of its competitors SmartFrog. However, this does mean that I am fairly ignorant of Puppet's internals. Other people are needed to fill this page out. We need:
* intro to the language
* more on the runtime
SteveLoughran (talk) 13:19, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  new page 

message: I've just created this page because there were too many external links on the Comparison of open source configuration management software page, and because it merited one on its own.
In keeping with Wiki policy, I don't work on the project; I work on one of its competitors SmartFrog. However, this does mean that I am fairly ignorant of Puppet's internals. Other people are needed to fill this page out. We need:
* intro to the language
* more on the runtime
SteveLoughran (talk) 13:19, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "Puppet (tool)" is not a conventional name ... I moved it to "Puppet (software)" after coming here looking for an article on the software and not finding it in the obvious place - David Gerard (talk) 12:49, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved 

message: The steps underneath the Transaction section seem to need their language tidying up. I'm not familiar with Puppet so don't know what is correct. Gsoper (talk) 17:10, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Transaction" section unclear 

message: Note that in the article, the following statement is made:
...and has Microsoft Windows support but use of it is discouraged since the Windows version requires giving personally identifiable information in order to be allowed to download it and redistribution of the Windows version is illegal.
The provided sources do not back up this claim, and it seems to be inaccurate and misleading.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.139.78.38 (talk) 10:32, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accuracy
Talk:Jam session

message: The lead gives "cypher" as an alternative to "jam session"; I can find no other reference or usage for this term outside some mentions of "cipher" as a hip-hop event (which even then seems not to have become general usage).  I am going to remove this word from the lead; if someone can come up with an informed way to mention the term elsewhere in the article feel free.  Jgm (talk) 13:26, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cypher?

message: * "Jam Session" is used in non-jazz contexts too (I play in old-time and bluegrass jams -- and in fact the Wikipedia photo is of a bluegrass jam).  But the description (and apparently the "WikiProject Jazz" context?) seems overly jazz focused for the general term.  The description text could easily be generalized, but I'm not sure what to do about the project aspect.  The various kinds jam sessions don't seem to me to be different enough to justify separate articles, so I suggest generalizing the text, and NOT connecting the resulting article to the "WikiProject Jazz" project.
CAPete (talk) 18:59, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blues Jam 
Talk:Non-carbon nanotube

message: I disagree that inorganic nanotubes would be used for a bullet-proof vest, over carbon nanotubes. The whole reason that Kevlar is used, is because of its tensile strength, not its impact resistence. Azz301 (talk) 13:36, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bullet-proof vest 

message: Perhaps there is a better example than copper, considering its abbreviation.
Stikshift (talk) 21:09, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copper Nanotubes? 

message: Is this meant to be all nanotubes apart from carbon (and maybe the metal carbides) ?
Lots here about tungsten disulphide nanotubes - echoed on Tungsten(IV) sulfide. - Rod57 (talk) 07:41, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Even carbon nanotubes technically do not qualify as organic compounds (since they are just carbon allotropes) but that hardly seems to be their main defining characteristic. I have seen many publications refer to this article's content as non-carbon nanotubes which seems like a better and more general concept. —Uzume (talk) 17:20, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this a good name
Talk:Phonetic notation of the American Heritage Dictionary

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Wikipedia:American Heritage Dictionary representation and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 19#Wikipedia:American Heritage Dictionary representation until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Liz Read! Talk! 13:45, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Wikipedia:American Heritage Dictionary representation" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:1985 Rajneeshee assassination plot

message: Hey Cirt, i would like to add the five FBI audio files to the following section of the 1985 Rajneeshee assassination plot article. 
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1985_Rajneeshee_assassination_plot#Investigation
However, i am not quite certain about what the appropriate template for multiple audio files would be. I would appreciate it if you would help me out in this regard. The accompanying caption should be as follows:
Thanks. Joyson Noel Holla at me! 07:45, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd suggest you notify WP:BLPN. I'll defer to consensus from the community from that discussion. — Cirt (talk) 15:40, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request
Talk:Local Health Integration Network

message: I am hoping to address the concern regarding the possible deletion of the LHIN wiki page. Hopefully I can provide clarification as to why the page should remain. The LHIN is not a company, nor is the goal to market or promote the LHIN. Rather, my intention is to provide information to interested Canadians and the International community. Ontario has undergone significant changes in its healthcare. The LHIN represents one of the changes to the system. 
If there are changes to the posting that would improve it, I look forward to additional input. 
Thanks,
Andrew
The first link (#1) seems to be broken and leads to a porn site... I'd rather someone correct the source than have me delete it outright.
Cheers,
..anthony
206.222.94.34 (talk) 20:30, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Clear view screen

message: Kent screens? Drutt (talk) 14:04, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

message: Given these were patented a decade earlier by Samuel Augustine de Normanville, it is unlikely the were invented in the 30’s by E. J. de Normanville. [This] shows a US patent from 1918; I assume there may be an earlier British one. The idea that this was invented in the 30s for autos is rubbish. Qwirkle (talk) 20:43, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accuracy