Talk:Postelsia

message: Very nice, one concern is the two "possibly unfree" images, the only substantive improvement I can suggest is to echo AnonEMouse's comment from the peer review requesting some link or reference to the laws covering harvesting. Pete.Hurd 19:54, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Article has been on hold too long. GreenJoe 17:14, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I am concerned about the references. Can you find more references? It seems like the length of this article should contain more than just 4 references. OhanaUnitedTalk page 06:26, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There are few references as it is, as it is a very little known organism, and these four have it covered.  I can go digging, if you like, though.  Werothegreat 13:00, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA feedback

message: taxobox - Sea palm pair 1.jpg
Sea palm group 1.jpg|thumb|left|Group of sea palms at the Pillar Point Marine Reserve.  Half Moon Bay, San Mateo.
currently in limbo while waiting for approval for use —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Werothegreat (talk • contribs) 21:35, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images for page 

message: :GA review (see here for criteria)
#It is reasonably well written.
#:a (prose):  b (MoS): 
#It is factually accurate and verifiable.
#:a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
#It is broad in its coverage.
#:a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
#It follows the neutral point of view policy.
#:a (fair representation):  b (all significant views): 
#It is stable.
#:
#It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
#:a (tagged and captioned):  b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA):  c (non-free images have fair use rationales): 
#Overall: 
#:a Pass/Fail: 
 
There's not much for me to comment for improvement. The article length and number of reference may be below the standard, but that's due to the fact that Postelsia is not a well known organism. After checking this article against the GA criteria, I believe that it has met all the criterias so the article will now receive GA class status. OhanaUnitedTalk page 17:20, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA Review 

message: This article talk page was automatically added with  banner as it falls under :Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 22:15, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:FOOD|WikiProject Food and drink]] Tagging

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Postelsia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070221164303/http://www.asudoit.com:80/pdfs/sea_food_foraging_recipes.pdf to http://www.asudoit.com/pdfs/sea_food_foraging_recipes.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:56, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified