Talk:Constituent assembly

message: I have reverted Iota's renaming of this page to "Constituent assembly" (with the lower-case "a").  Reason: Proper nouns should be capitalized.  "Constituent Assembly" is a proper noun, just like "National Assembly" or "Indian National Congress."  It is not a descriptive noun, but a noun that has been the formal name of numerous legislative bodies and constitutional conventions throughout history. David Cannon 01:09, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for explaining.  I think I can see now where you are coming from.  I'll wait to see what other users think, but it might be a good idea to expand the list to include every Constituent Assembly we know of, and rename the article as a list.  I'm not sure ... I'm in two minds about that.  Maybe you or some others will have some idea. David Cannon 11:04, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The above is mostly right, but no one's acted on it, so I went ahead and did it myself. Soo 18:03, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation

message: This seems to be the same thing as a constitutional convention, a name I would hazard is more common in Anglo-Saxon political traditions. Any objections to a merger? —Felix the Cassowary 07:46, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Same as constitutional convention 

message: The introduction says that members of the constituent assembly are citizens but "not necessarily" the rulers of the country. "Not necessarily" means that they might be the rulers. So, a constituent assembly is not necessarily different from the other forms of constitution-making. So the sentences after the first add very little, and the intro is quite uninformative. We can replace them with "the members of the constituent assembly must be citizens of the country whose constitution they are creating". -Pgan002 (talk) 06:00, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Not necessarily the ruler"? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Constituent assembly. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110511193704/http://www.common-place.dreamhost.com/pasley/?page_id=491 to http://www.common-place.dreamhost.com/pasley/?page_id=491
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:34, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I have taken out some unsourced material that said there was a big distinction between a constituent assembly and a constitutional convention; one being elected and one not. After doing some research it seems like they essentially treated the same in outside sources with the difference is them being alternative names:
*
* 
I moved over a lot of the information from the constitutional convention page and would suggest merging them. Any thoughts?
Bluealbion (talk) 16:55, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: constitui 2409:4052:D95:26CF:A899:4B84:8CE8:85D4 (talk) 06:01, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Constitution assembly was congress assembly