lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Lieutenant Governor of Saskatchewan

message: I have assessed this as Start Class, as it contains more detail and organization than would be expected of a Stub, and of low importance, as it is a highly specific topic within Canada. Cheers, CP 22:40, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: This, as in the body, is the correct spelling -- unlike "Governor General," which has no hyphen. Can the spelling in the title not be fixed? Masalai (talk) 00:19, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: What is the logical basis or source for that hyphen?  It seems odd to me.  A Canadian thing?  Dicklyon (talk) 18:38, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Lieutenant-Governor

message: I have started an RfC on this question at Talk:Governor General of Canada.  All comments welcome. --Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 14:46, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for Comment: Should the term "viceroy" be used as a synonym for "Governor General" or "Lieutenant Governor" in articles on Canadian government?
Talk:KZNG

message: Arbitron ratings information cannot be used without written permission from Arbitron, even top line information.69.37.68.72 (talk) 08:53, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ratings
Talk:Franco-Albertans

message: I have assessed this as Start Class, as it contains more detail and organization than would be expected of a Stub, and of low importance, as it is a highly specific topic within Canada. Cheers, CP 22:43, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:Artists and Orphans: A True Drama

message: *
*
*
* — Scientizzle 18:12, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible sources
Talk:Brian K. Smith

message: I believe this individual meets notability guidelines for academics as per Wikipedia:Notability (academics):
"The person has received a notable award or honor, or has been often nominated for them."
IST301 18:20, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I see no reason to remove this page as "instructors request" -- there is no such policy. He likely is notable. Nor can it be removed at the author's request, as others have edited. The subject can request removal via a OTRS request, but that will only be allowed if the notability is considered  borderline. Anyone unhappy with this can contact me, if necessary by email. DGG (talk) 00:07, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Thomas A. Scully

message: The article is very skewed at this time. In it's current form it mostly describes only one side of a central event (the alleged threat to fire Foster), which it doesn't even cover that well. Scully was involved with other noteworthy activities while with CMS, which are not covered. As this is an article about a living person, it is important not to give undue weight to a single event, and all events should cover both sides of any event in order to be NPOV. -- 208.81.184.4 21:46, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: you're right, but when someone makes big headlines for one thing but otherwise isn't super famous, the  stub of a new article is going to necessarily be mainly about those headlines, whether positive or negative-I mean if an article is so short it says hardly anything, at least it should say what the guy is famous for. Hopefully many people will work and expand this article. That should make it more balanced(I hope).Rich 03:00, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Balance
Talk:Sadhu bhasha

message: No references, seems hard to verify. Adding "Dubious" tag. Aveek (talk) 17:16, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Artificially Sanskritised? 

message: This article possesses fancied Information about the vocabulary of Sādhu Bhāṣā . There is no such thing like prevalence of Pali words in this form of Bengali. It can be said that Pali words are almost identical with Bengali words also in pronunciation. Other informations such as Brahmins used this language for translating Sanskrit texts aren't the key point. This type of advantage of Sādhu Bhāṣā was never ascertained.আলবি রেজা (talk) 09:02, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unverified conceptions 

message: At the top of this article it says: "For the Standard register of the language, known as Shuddho bhasha, see Bengali language." But if you go to that page, it only mentions Cholitobhasha, not Shuddho bhasha.  Some clarification on that would be nice ?
Shahin911 (talk) 07:08, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion of terms
Talk:Northrepps

message: maybe the primary school should be mentioned and some of the activities that go on within the vilage such as a computer club and a village to hire?
:Done!  stavros1  ♣ 
I don't think gnomes is at the primary school anymore, I thought it was Northrepps preschool?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.135.20.127 (talk) 23:06, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Jon Povill

message: Not my fault, someone looked up my dad, showed me. But I'm fairly sure I'm not Canadian, even if I am at UBC. Born and raised in Cali. -_-;
Took off the Canadian part for ya, since you would know if you were Canadian -A UBC floormate 75.157.22.20 (talk) 08:23, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Adviser

message: adviser or advisor
Firefox always marked -or as misspelled so i changed to -er then my boss told me I was wrong and it was -or. So I looked it up.
http://www.agriculture.purdue.edu/agcomm/ontarget/0502/adviser_advisor.htm
so which is it? if -er is the real spelling maybe it should be the name of the article and -or should redirect to it.
Wisekris 18:35, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  -er  or  -or 

message: Hi,
I believe that this page should be an article instead of an disambiguation page. An advisor is a form of occupation by itself, just like a Doctor, Teacher etc. People who search for Advisor on Wikipedia would be overwhelmed with links and find out it is actually an disambiguation page. Please review. Thanks.  ★ Oliverlyc ★ ✈✈✈  Pop me a message! 05:13, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation or article 

message: I went ahead and moved the page to adviser, which seems to be the clear winner for the following reasons:
*given first in most US (M-W, AHD) and UK (Oxford, Chambers
*more common over time, according to [s/graph?content=adviser%2Cadvisor&year_start=1800&year_end=2000&corpus=15&smoothing=3&share=&direct_url=t1%3B%2Cadviser%3B%2Cc0%3B.t1%3B%2Cadvisor%3B%2Cc0 Google Ngrams] (though advisor is catching up)
Lesgles (talk) 15:57, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling 

message: I expanded the article and saw that it had a disambiguation tag. I removed the tag and then saw here that it was listed as associated with WikiProject Disambiguation. I am sure it was just over-looked, that it still had the tag, as the "article" is not a disambiguation page. Otr500 (talk) 01:11, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation 
Talk:William James (Royal Navy officer, born 1881)

message: This distinguished officer had this nickname and painting follow him all his life. Do we have to use the painting as his official Wiki picture too? You just can't live some things down, it seems.
How about putting up his adult picture, with the Millais painting further down the article?69.181.249.69 (talk) 06:08, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: We'd love to, but we need one that can be used without violating copyright. Paul B (talk) 13:35, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: Why does this article have his birth year in the title?   The MOS WP:PRECISE says that "titles should unambiguously define the topical scope of the article, but should be no more precise than that".  Seems to me that "William James (Royal Navy officer)" meets that requirement.  There's no other article about a Williams James who served in the RN. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 03:42, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of article
Talk:KKAY

message: I propose that KBRS-FM be split off into a separate article at  instead of article as it is now. They use different transmitters, are licensed to different locations, have different owners. -- 65.92.247.90 (talk) 05:21, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Has KBRS always rebroadcast KKAY? If so, it's very unlikely to meet the GNG on its own. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 18:30, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Split KBRS off of KKAY
Talk:KNXX

message: On December 5, 2013 KYPY changed their call letters back to KNXX.http://licensing.fcc.gov/cgi-bin/ws.exe/prod/cdbs/pubacc/prod/call_hist.pl?Facility_id=36160&Callsign=KNXX  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.27.198.89 (talk) 05:43, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: KYPY changes calls back to KNXX
Talk:KPAE

message: Per the WP:Disambig page, "If only a primary topic and one other topic require disambiguation, then disambiguation links are sufficient, and a disambiguation page is unnecessary." Since the radio station call letters are the primary identification and the ICAO code reference to an airport is a secondary identification, a hat note is sufficient and requires no more steps than would a disambiguation page for people seeking the airport. - Dravecky (talk) 08:27, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rationale for deletion of disambiguation page
Talk:Fitch High School

message: A series of WP:SPAs have been attempting to add Christopher Annino as a notable alumnus. Per WP:ALUMNI he must have a citation showing his attendance and either a Wikipedia article or sufficient sources to show his notability to be included on the list of notable alumni.
The first attempts did not show his attendance but the latest attempt  has now added a source that confirms Annino's attendance at the school.
He does not have a wikipedia article showing his notability, thus he needs sources to show that he can be presumed to be notable.  The applicable guideline for a filmmaker is WP:CREATIVE, but the six sources do not establish his notability. IMDB is a user-generated site and is not a reliable source.  Four of the other sources are just passing mention of him having directed a silent film. According to the IMDB ref he wrote it too, and it had a budget of $20,000. It also premiered at a local library so we can safely assume this was not a major film. There's no evidence at all to support the claim that Annino is an "International Award Winning Filmmaker".  The sixth source is more interesting. It mentions that a film will be made about his life, but is certainly not sufficient show his notability on its own.
WP:WTAF applies here. If he's notable then write the article about him first to prove his notability. Meters (talk) 07:32, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree completely with .  The only way you'll get past my objection to his perceived notability is to WP:WTAF. I've reverted again, and I would suggest you not re-add it until there is a consensus formed here to do so, and again, the ONLY way you are going to gain said consensus is to write his biography first. John from Idegon (talk) 19:58, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alumnus Christopher Annino
Talk:One Night Stand (Mis-Teeq song)

message: This is an automated message regarding an image used on this page. The image :File:1nitestand.jpg, found on :One Night Stand (song), has been nominated for deletion because it does not meet Wikipedia image policy. Please see the image description page for more details. If this message was sent in error (that is, the image is not up for deletion, or was left on the wrong talk page), please contact this bot's operator.  STBotI (talk) 17:54, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: An image on this page may be deleted
Talk:Árbol del Tule

message: 5 has no links to anything to support if it's real, or made up, first off... Second off, the sixth reference is a piece of hype. "What "General Grant" is to the giant sequoias, El Arbol del Tule is to the bald cypresses." "The area has only two distinct seasons: a humid, often cloudy, hot, rainy season typical of the "summer-rain tropics" south of the Tropic of Cancer, and a warm, dry "winter" season with bright sunny days, cool nights, and frequent frosts in the mountains." It is full of creative liberties in descriptions, and non-facts. People not native to Arizona also claim we don't have four seasons. But, we in fact have four seasons. They just aren't used to it. Everywhere on Earth has four seasons, because seasons are caused by the planet's orbit around the sun. So, the #6 citation is to something written by an unreliable idiot better suited to writing poetry, fiction, or advertisements. It is not a credible source. So, how credible is the unproven fifth one? Or, any of the others? Ridiculous. It's clear that the locals benefit by the tree being said to be all one tree, especially with the "miraculous" giant tree right next to a church. So, citations of a claim it has been proven all one tree, I think, should have proof they are not as made up as the claim itself might be. If it's true, there should be articles, or other potentially reliable sources to link to. (You can actually tell in one of the photos that it is multiple trees merged into one. They do not have consistent bark. & It's easy to see other photos where it's obviously multiple trees that merged.) --174.19.244.195 (talk) 12:03, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unreliable citations 

message: The whole tone of the article is like people lie, Mexicans maybe, so it is better to believe a Mexican legend who no one has heard before. Everything in the article makes it unpleasant to read.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.123.30.65 (talk) 14:44, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article written by a paranoid? ==

message: The section "Slowly Dying" is based on citation 9 from 1990. It is over 30 years later and the tree continues to grow. Has the impending death of the tree been slowed or reversed? CastellamareAsh (talk) 09:55, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Is there new information on the health of the tree?
Talk:1962 American Football League Championship Game

message: I am pointing out "We will kick to the clock."  Writeups I had seen up to that point said "We'll kick to the clock."  Also, I inserted the subsequent dialog I heard.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.63.16.20 (talk) 20:42, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  See talk page for [[Abner Haynes]] 

message: A bit heavy on the sportswriter editorializing. Manys (talk) 20:15, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: "Thumped?" "Erudite?"
Talk:Deal or No Deal Malaysia (Mandarin-language game show)

message: Although the name of the country of this version (Malaysia) is mentioned in the article, nevertheless it should also be included in the title of the article as to eliminate ambiguity. There are two Chinese versions; the other is in Hong Kong. 60.51.125.128 11:25, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've finally moved it. Fanatix 01:43, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of country 
Talk:When I Grow Up (webcomic)

message: Note I've updated the banner above and I estimate grading class as between Start and B-Class, but noted it has no independent references needed for Wikipedia's Notability requirements. It had two nominations in 2004 Web Cartoonist's Choice Awards, and there must be some other good references out there. I've started by adding a ref for the Webcomics Examiner. -Wikianon 19:04, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes

message: It does not make any sense to merge this article into Wigu, because they are two completely different comics by one creator.  If they were merged, then the Wigu article would be way too long and confused.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mynameisnotpj (talk • contribs) 12:29, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:American Knees

message: Am I the only one who thinks this article was written like a advertisement? If we're going to say that it "shocked and excited" readers then can we cite some sources? ElbowLick (talk) 00:52, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality
Talk:Anthony D. Williams (author)

message: This seems like a notable author. Certainly I did not write this entry to advertise for him.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  19:07, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If he is a notable author, you should add some content about his written works.  It would also help to have multiple independent verifiable sources, not just the one link to his website.  --Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 19:19, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Santa María del Tule

message: I think El Arbol del Tule article should be merge with this article under a Famous Landmarks section or something like that, not to mention that this article is a stub and needs more information. Supaman89 19:09, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Disagree strongly. The tree is far more famous than the town (let's face it, how many people outside of Mexico would have heard of Santa María if it hadn't been for the tree?!). - MPF 21:02, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

text: I too disagree. This tree is notable worldwide. Monkeytheboy (talk) 19:11, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

text: Disagree. The tree should have its own article. Skizzik (talk) 20:38, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Aslo disagree... tree needs its own article and this town deservesits own like any other Mexican town.Thelmadatter (talk) 18:20, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Persecution of Jehovah's Witnesses in Canada

message: JWs in Quebec faced a lot of antagonism from the Catholic Church, in part because of their statements about the satanic nature of the Catholic Church.  This does not justify anything, but is part of the context. Richardson mcphillips (talk) 14:31, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  antagonism with the Catholic Church in Quebec 

message: Apart from one quote, this article is entirely unsourced. If reliable secondary sources are not added, the article will be proposed for deletion in the near future.--Jeffro77 (talk) 00:24, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced 

message: The current address to the video, entitled "The Legalization of the Work in Quebec" is here:
https://www.jw.org/finder?srcid=share&prefer=content&applanguage=F&locale=en&item=pub-jwbiv_201611_1_VIDEO&docid=1011214  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.238.231.196 (talk) 17:55, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Video link in the references section has moved
Talk:Persecution of Jehovah's Witnesses in the United States

message: ::This thread moved from user talk to article talk here.
Regarding this edit, "attacked the doctrines of the Roman Catholic Church and other Christians" was not intended to suggest that JWs attacked other Christians, an interpretation not supported by the context. Parsing the phrase as "attacked [the doctrines of the Roman Catholic Church] and [other Christians]" is an invalid comparison, so it seems pretty clear that it means "attacked the doctrines of [the Roman Catholic Church] and [other Christians]". It could however have benefited from another "of" before "other Christians". For the moment, I think the other wording might be okay, though I think "so vigorously that" seems a bit weaselish, because it doesn't indicate how vigorously, and implies some kind of value judgement about how much of an attack justifies a particular response.--Jeffro77 (talk) 08:09, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Immediately prior to my edit at Persecution of Jehovah's Witnesses in the United States#1930s and 1940s, the wording was wrong; the wording after my edit was also imperfect. Neither wording was of my creation; I just reverted to an earlier wording. Editors should feel free to improve wording without the pre-approval of others. General suggestions belong at an article's Talk page. --AuthorityTam (talk) 14:18, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The wording was not 'wrong'; you misinterpreted it by parsing it in an invalid manner, so I came to your Talk page to indicate that your inference in your edit summary about what I wrote was incorrect, and potentially misleading as to my intent. Therefore, my clarification to you regarding your claim in your edit summary about my edit belongs at your Talk page, not at article Talk. Thanks.--Jeffro77 (talk) 15:07, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Oooookay... Sorry for the shorthand "wrong", merely intended to connote "requiring improvement", yada, yada, yada.My edit clearly explained why the wording was reverted to earlier wording (my edit comment was: Not just doctrine, but practices and history were "attacked". Individual Christians were not attacked, only organizations. Reinstate 2010-02-25 wording.).If User:AuthorityTam had created the replacement wording, it might make sense to discuss this at User talk:AuthorityTam. It seems obvious that it would be more productive to put this discussion at the article talk, that is, at Talk:Persecution of Jehovah's Witnesses in the United States, so that others can benefit from it. I've moved this thread from user talk to article talk. --AuthorityTam (talk) 15:31, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The statement was placed at your Talk page because your edit summary, as a result of you parsing the statement in an invalid manner implied something untrue about what I stated.--Jeffro77 (talk) 22:21, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attacks
Talk:Spritz (alcoholic beverage)

message: I've always heard that it was the Austrians that imported the "spritzer" to Italy.  Spritzer is the German word for wine and fizzy water, and it seems obvious to me that the word is not Italian in origins.
the austrians brought to veneto the use to dilute wine with water calling it "spritzer" and from that originated the spritz, which is more than that and it is typically venetian. the more common type of spritz, by now, is aperol, prosecco and soda water. until a few years ago it was barely known outside veneto and the surrounding areas.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.14.36.152 (talk) 22:22, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
Talk:A Gruesome Twosome

message: The filmography page lists characters named "Captain" and "Snooks" for this cartoon. Was that the names of the two mangy alley cats? Or was "Snooks" the girl cat ? Also, I'm surprised these cats weren't used again for another picture. They had potential, if maybe the violence was toned down a tad. --The_Iconoclast (talk) 10:32, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Captain and Snooks?
Talk:Pauline Fowler/Archive 2

message: So, are we ready to try again?  I recommend that we go through another peer review first, before going after the FA nom.  Does that sound okay with folks?  I think we do have an excellent article here.  :) --Elonka 15:42, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A peer review maybe better adviced, this way the article can weed out impurities that would just muddle up the FAC.   BIGNOLE   (Contact me) 16:17, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That sounds good, it might be a good idea to get a copy editor to go over it too. Does anyone know of anyone who might be good to ask? Gungadin♦ 20:33, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Check at Wikipedia:WikiProject League of Copyeditors? They're always backlogged, but you might be able to get someone's attention. --Elonka 00:29, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: FA attempt, part deux

message: it is innacurate to say that Pauline hit her head on the fruitbowl or table, I only had to watch it once to see that. She stumbles into the table, bumping into the suitcase which pushes the fruitbowl off. Then she falls to the floor and still doesn't hit her head as her hand was in between her head and the floor when she fell.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.5.220.176 (talk) 16:54, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That info was taken from the review of the episode from The Times (). I can't remember what actually happened myself, but I'll take your word for it and remove the stuff about her hitting her head on the fruit bowl. Gungadin♦ 00:22, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: DEATH