lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Occupational therapy/to do

message: * Remove subjective comments about status of occupational therapy in Australia compared to other fields.
* Citations will need to be put in order and cleaned out.
* History needs to be streamlined/cleaned up due to excessive detail.
* Add Frames of References.  (Suggestion: create LINKS to frames of reference and new articles instead of putting the whole thing in this article)  99.251.176.29 Jipy (talk) 02:22, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Crazy Ray

message: I did not do the Crazy Ray article, but would like to say he was the unofficial, unpaid mascot of the Dallas Cowboys (ref http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17668002 and www.dallascowboys.com )  
Didn't the San Diego Chargers have a guy named Crazy George cheerleading in the stands with his rainbow fro?  He is also of note, and probably a little better know than Crazy Ray. 
If there is a category of Famous Mascots/Cheerleaders, they would belong.
"Didn't the San Diego Chargers have a guy named Crazy George cheerleading in the stands with his rainbow fro? He is also of note, and probably a little better know than Crazy Ray."  -- Give me a break. No one cares about the Chargers. They are Tiajuana's team -- the Cowboys are AMERICA's TEAM
:Don't be racist nor biased, and please sign. 72.200.27.179 00:42, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Headline text 
Talk:John Hall (physician)

message: Does anyone have an image of John Hall's family coat of arms? Sam Wilson 01:47, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Coat of Arms?

message: Is there a list of literature attributed to John Hall? Specifically "On an Houre-glasse?" CriminyCraperton (talk) 15:56, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poetry attributed to John Hall 
Talk:List song

message: Wfructose changed my example of Sondheim's "I'm Still Here" to "Not Getting Married Today" because the latter is a patter song. However, the subject here is not patter songs but list songs and "I'm Still Here" is much more clearly a list (of events occurring during an actress's career) than "Not Getting Married Today" is, so I'm changing it back. However, I'd be happy to throw this open to discussion. Note that there is considerable overlap between patter songs and list songs, which confuses the issue. Clampton 01:58, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I want to apologize to JzG for moving so many titles into the examples list without citations (there will be more), but my feeling was that this article was at something of a standstill and the only way to get it moving again was to add examples. I'll look for citations, because Wikipedia needs verifiability, but my gut feeling is that I'd need an expert citation to convince me that "We Didn't Start the Fire" isn't a list song. Clampton 20:31, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Verifiability 

message: I'm curious why "Eclipse" by Pink Floyd is not considered a list song.  According to the definition contained in the article it certainly should be, and I've seen it referred to as such in many places as well as by Waters himself.  Please explain. Andy 16:27, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eclipse? 

message: This page is not an article, but a list of list songs. And no LOLS would be complete without
I do the Rock (Tim Curry)
People who Died (the Jim Carrol Band)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.125.146.118 (talk) 17:53, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  More 

message: The Ira/Weill number for Danny Kaye is listed twice, once as Tschaikowsky and once as Tchaikovsky. I believe Ira Gershwin spelled the name the first way, but at all events consistency would be desirable. 22:15, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tchaik 

message: Should the songs starting with a number come first?  Like 88 lines about 44 women  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:281:C101:2174:989F:FBE0:BAF3:FDE7 (talk) 23:48, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  MJB 

message: Does "Shake Your Head" by Was Not Was belong in this article? 
What about "Don't Touch My Bikini" by Halo Benders?
- Joshua Clement Broyles—Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.29.176.65 (talk) 23:17, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shake your head? 

message: Is it some sort of meta-joke that the article about list songs also has a list of list songs?  Most articles on wikipedia don't have a sudden long list attached to the end of it.  It also makes the table of contents for the article become awful. 2405:6580:DBC0:1600:7127:46B8:C9FC:303A (talk) 16:54, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is there a list?
Talk:List of Boogiepop characters

message: A request for comments has been started that could affect the inclusion 
or exclusion of episode and character, as well as other fiction articles. Please 
visit the discussion at 
Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(fiction)#Final_adoption_as_a_guideline. Ikip (talk) 11:08, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for comment on articles for individual television episodes and characters

message: I've been trying to go through and fill out what remains left over from the allusions Kadono-sensei makes, and made a few changes to the ones previously there, namely the removing John Mellencamps 'Scarecrow' reference in favor of the Pink Floyd, as the Piper at the Gates of Dawn is specifically mentioned in that book, hence much more likely to be a reference to that song.
Also another thing is that I think I finally cracked the 'Embryo' reference, but I'm not going to put it on there in case I've totally go it wrong, but its neither of the ones posted out there. Instead Embryo (band) seems much likely in my opinion. They are super obscure, they sound like many of the other bands Kadono uses heavily (Specifically King Crimson), and there output derives largely in part from the early 70s progressive rock scene which Kadono (and admittedly me) is a huge fan of, having used King Crimson, Pink Floyd and ELP over and over again. What actually sealed the idea of Embryo being the reference outside of musical and chronological similarity, was that they have an album 'Fathers Sons & Holy Ghosts' which then would simultaneously fill in the blanks for the 'Holy & Ghost' novels. 
I'll refrain from adding any of that in until some other opinions chime in, but of course, I really have no clue who checks this... Maybe Doceiras or Elric?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by SubtleBoom (talk • contribs) 03:03, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I definitely appreciate the resources, even if I'm no longer translating the series. That type of music is a bit of a blind spot for me (anything not in Rock Band sort of is) and it's hard to research just by googling it. I'd suggest avoiding the word "trivia" though. Doceirias (talk) 04:13, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  No prob at all, and thanks for the speedy reply. Good idea about removing the word 'trivia' from it, I'll get on that sometime as well as doing some of Kadono's references outside of the BP series, Outlandos D'amour being an album by The Police etc. I also am very keen on finally doing a page for Vol. 6, since I know you can't do it due to conflict of interest and no one else seems to give a shit about it being a blaring hole. On a side note, Rock Band has some good tunes, nothing to be ashamed of. Oh and my bad for spelling your name wrong above, I check Easternstandard and your blog enough to not have made that mistake. (Yes, I'm a goddamn creeper/lurker). SubtleBoom (talk) 04:45, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Musical Allusions
Talk:List of minor Samurai Shodown characters

message: This list consciously doesn't use the infoboxes, as there's so little to say about so many of these characters that you'll end up with gobs of whitespace in order to place lists of unencyclopedic birthdates and birthplaces and favorite foods in a table. All of the encyclopedic info normally in the template is in the prose anyway. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 01:58, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Infoboxes
Talk:Nitro (Six Flags Great Adventure)

message: it is a fun thrilling experience  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.169.114.193 (talk) 14:21, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  nitro 

message: , I see you've been contesting the ride duration in this article. Instead of reverting back and forth in the article, which is a form of edit warring that is not permitted, let's discuss the issue here. Ride duration can increase or decrease at times, depending on ride operators, number of riders on a train, environment conditions (coaster run faster depending on weather), and a variety of other factors. Wikipedia has a strict policy against original research, and to analyze footage and publish your own findings is not permitted. If you'd like to discuss further why you are witnessing different times, we can do so here if needed, but hopefully this answers some basic questions. The primary point though is to avoid disruption in the article, which is what the back-and-forth editing causes. --GoneIn60 (talk) 18:43, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ride duration
Talk:Gandara

message: At  250px, this image is larger than the entirety of the article's prose. Please don't make it unnecessarily larger again. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 02:00, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Its not at 250px. Check the edit diff prior to mindlessly reverting with rollback, please. And please don't use rollback on legitimate edits. I've no problem with bringing this on WP:AN/I is the policy infringement gets out of hand. See Help:Reverting. -Randall Brackett 02:04, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Please don't revert with "rv" either. And 235 has exactly the same problem. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 02:06, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Don't play games with me. The image is suitible. -Randall Brackett 02:09, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's larger than the entirety of the article itself. That's not acceptable. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 02:12, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

text: No it isn't. That's the infobox. The image is smaller than the opening pharagraph. May be your monitor, perhaps. -Randall Brackett 02:25, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Image
Talk:Fan edit

message: I updated this entry.  It must be pretty obvious that this movie is the most complete fan-edited movie of all time.  In terms of alternate TV cuts/official versions and the sheer amount of versions that has appeared on the net.  What's the argument here?  If someone wants to argue this then they should come up with an alternative?  I have yet to see it...
I would disagree, as I am betting each individual episode of Star Wars except the most recent EPIII, has as many edits released as any Superman film.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by He-guy (talk • contribs) 08:05, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Superman II 

message: I'm not sure what criteria we're looking at for 'notable' but I removed three, two because a google searched turned up nothing, and one becuase it's not even finished. 
I think more of these should be cut as I don't see any criteria that makes the 'notable' except "The Phantom Edit" which is notbale as being one of the first.
BoosterBronze (talk) 19:12, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable? 

message: Star Trek: Phase II is described here as a fan edit series. The Phase II series (formerly known as Star Trek: New Voyages) is actually a fan-made production, using entirely new footage, and has a comprehensive Wiki page. The fan edit ("In Thy Image") is a version of Star Trek V: The Final Frontier, created by the same man as the fan series, and also sometimes referred to as "Phase II" because it was edited to resemble a TV pilot for the aborted series of the same name which was originally intended to be a follow-up series to ST: The Original Series and eventually became Star Trek: The Motion Picture.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.206.146.123 (talk) 13:57, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Star Trek: Phase II 

message: Removed the ridiculous comment that a recent MPAA action "backfired" because it increased traffic to the offending website. The MPAA is concerned with protecting copyrights, not controlling your website's hit counter. The comment is contentious and conveys a form of arrogance that does not benefit the fanedit community. Do you really want to challenge and piss off studio laywers?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.86.46.203 (talk) 10:40, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Respect the MPAA 

message: The website fanedit.org is mentioned in text, and is listed as an external site. This article is not about fanedit.org. Thus, the removal of other legitimate websites from the links section is evidence of bias. I've already corrected one case of source arrogance in this entry. The next time someone wishes to delete a link to a legitimate fanedit website, I'd like to see that person also provide a convincing rationale. There is no need to censor websites that have been online for 12+ months and show up immediately on relevant search listings.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.8.72.192 (talk) 13:33, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tunnel Vision
Talk:Kidd Mine

message: The minesite formerly known as Kidd Creek is located in Timmins, Ontario.  The location has never been desribed as the municipality known as "500 miles northwest of Toronto" and never will.
--  --  --
All of the information was taken word-for-word from [Infomine]
I have since reworked some of it, but had trouble getting footnotes to work.
--Kelapstick 17:55, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:AMA Coordinator/Archive 1

message: Please see Wikipedia_talk:Association_of_Members'_Advocates#Association_of_Member_Investigations. Cheers, (Sam Spade | talk | contributions) 09:13, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Association of Member Investigations

message: User:Wally and I have had a breakdown of communication, and I request your assitance in regards to our inter-advocate relations. Please see User_talk:Sam_Spade#El_C_Mediation, User_talk:Wally, and WP:RfM#User:El_C_and_User:Sam_Spade. Cheers, (Sam Spade | talk | contributions) 14:18, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not exactly sure what all this is about. I am representing a user, and Sam is representing himself, on the opposite sides of a dispute. The fact that he's come to you is close to a conflict-of-interest on his part. You can see Sam's talk page for most of the 'dispute', and mine for the opening parts; be aware, however, that for reasons passing my meager understanding Sam deleted a request I'd made a month ago to conform to Wikipedian civility standards. See here: Deleted section Wally
Do you mean User_talk:Sam_Spade#A_Request_from_El_C_and_Myself? I moved it, altho its been so long that it would have been perfectly reasonable to archive or delete it. I didn't, I kept it around, indeed referring you to review it (when I said "see above"). This, (along w the ludicrous suggestion of a conflict of interest) is the sort of nonsense that has me requesting assistance from our coordinator. The obstructionism and / or lack of attention to detail on your part is also becoming increasingly clear. (Sam Spade | talk | contributions) 08:29, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)

text: And this has what to do with our Coordinator? Wally 16:59, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inter-advocate relations 

message: I feel that User:Sam Spade has acted contrary to not only the interests of the AMA but to the spirits of the organization as well with this, forgive my strong language, abomination: User:Sam Spade/Report rogue admin. In it he attempts to list administrators that he feels are 'rogues' with a 'mandate to abuse'. He specifically states that he maintains the page in order to bring attention to these users and prepare for arbitration against them. I feel this is totally unacceptable behavior for someone who is voluntarily sworn to 'resolving disputes and reducing conflict'. An opinion from the Coordinator would be highly helpful. Wally 03:24, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I was unaware that sanctions were part of the AMA. Sam Spade 09:34, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It is the Coordinator's job to maintain the dignity and integrity of the organization, non? Wally 16:36, 29 May 2005 (UTC)

text: I think I'll leave that to Alex to decide. I merely thought that your behavior ought to be brought to his attention. It doesn't exactly smack of attention to the human rights around which this organization is based. Wally 19:38, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sanction request
Talk:Plowshare

message: The article Plough is titled with the British English spelling. One way or another shouldn't the titular spelling of that article and this be made consistent? SCRA5071 23:47, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consistency with Plough 

message: It doesn't matter if it is "plow" or "plough" just pick one and stay consistent. And please, stop with the "plowing(ploughing)" business--it makes the article unpleasant if not impossible to read.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.111.89.79 (talk) 16:46, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please, just pick one 
Talk:Glossary of Italian music

message: Hello, again, Tuf-Kat. I went through a made a few minor adjustments such that the initial prep+article combination alla is consisistently eliminated and the item stands alone by first letter of the noun. Also, there were a few sing/plural inconcistencies of the kind canti translated as "song" instead of "songs". I left the Italian plural alone where you have "A kind of..".  Also, unless your Lomax reference says that addio padre has become a generic name for a kind of song (from the name of one particular song from 1916), it shouldn't be on the list.  I also changed "beaten guitar' to "beating..." Jeffmatt 06:33, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: adusted for grammatical consistency

message: As of 22 October 2006, I'm making a speedy failing of this article, because this article is a list. Per WP:WIAGA, list is not reviewed by the GA system. Editors should consider nominating this article to featured list candidates. Good luck. — Indon (reply) — 09:05, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Failed for GA 

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot 04:04, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-02-7 Automated pywikipediabot message
Talk:KLVJ (FM)

message: KPRI-FM is the only locally owned and operated station in the San Diego market, and is operated by the Compass Radio Group, Inc.
Is this still correct even though 90.3, 91X, and 92.5 are now owned by Finest City Broadcasting? --Etcetera 02:25, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Keith Carter (photographer)

message: The image on this page is not in the public domain. However, I can get it released for use. If all artist-related articles relied on public domain images, then no living artist could have a wikipedia article with an image on it. Should I word to make this happen?
Helenabucket 02:27, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The photo is not public domain, but as a low-resolution copy of his book cover its considered Fair Use. Basically the theory is that using this photo benefits the copyright holders in that it promotes the book. If you can get a release, that is better than Fair Use. Also an actual photo of Mr. Carter would help the article as well. SteveHopson 15:52, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have a photo, and I own the copyright. Unfortunately, I'm a novice at this, and I'm unsure how to handle getting it up on the page and in the proper place.--Jfulbright 21:22, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Can we not get an image of his work? I think it would fall under fair use to have a book cover or SOMETHING. Jfulbright (talk) 18:34, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image of work?
Talk:Swingin' Stampede

message: In the album booklet, for some reason, the songs "Red Bird" and "Ida Red" (Tracks 11 & 14, respectively) are not followed by the name of the songwriter, thus when I wrote this article I left two blank spots right after those tracks in the "Track Listing" section. Those spots are waiting anxiously to be filled.--Methegreat 02:29, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Songwriting credits on Tracks 11 & 14 

message: I have classified the article as a start although it needs more information both about recording and public and critical response. Capitalistroadster 10:15, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Start classification
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Leaders of East Orlando

message: D-Day and other Wike editors.  I propose this page be separate from East Orlando, FL, as that area really deserves its own page, not to be confused with the non-profit corporation.
Your thoughts?
John Tenney
:What is the deletion about? Leaders of East Orlando doesn't exist.--Commander Keane 02:51, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Chiaramonte Gulfi

message: Hi PhotoCatBot, yes I agree that the article has enough images. Thanks--Sal73x (talk) 15:09, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Photos
Talk:Ancient Tamil music

message: The link to Maanikkavasagar is incorrect. That page has an incorrect name and some incorrect info. Please see my comments there.--Aadal 21:43, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is now fixed. I have rewritten both the articles. - Parthi 23:46, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment by [[User:Aadal|Aadal]]

message: Wiki Raja 10:26, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Dravidian civilizations
Talk:Icelandic folk music

message: I have an Album entitled "Icelandic Folk Songs" But I can't seem to find any details on it. If somebody can please provide me with them.
 
:Try to find out the exactly tittle and the copyright detail --Basstonic (talk) 23:13, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Album 
Talk:Socialist Party of Great Britain (Reconstituted)

message: Trying to end revert war - NPOV, they were expelled.  Their case was that conference did not have the power to alter the party name - though this was only, really, a battle ground selected out of a variety of disputes, regarding the orientation of the party.  Their account as published in Socialist Studies as well as those published in Socialist Standard should form the verifiable basis for this section.--Red Deathy 09:48, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Expulsion

message: I'd suggest mentioning that Hardy et al. were older members, some of whom had been at the centre of party activity for many years would be worth a mention - although it wasn't entirely an old/new guard fight it's often perceived as one.  Further detailing could provide a useful study in micropolitics...--Red Deathy 09:50, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Cheers anon.  It wasn't a de facto name change, it was a change in the use of name.  The argument centred, IIRC on the fact that the two branches maintained that the name couldn't be changed without altering the DoP (and subordinate to that, that the DoP couldn't be changed), they were expelled, with what seems extreme reluctance on the part of the then EC, after repeated attempts to resolve the issue.  Are you proposing to use your paragraph above to alter the article, it seems  a bit POV, but could form the basis of something useful.--Red Deathy 07:37, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

text: Actually, the interesting question is, for me, why anyone would make their stand over the use of the party name, I know the battles had been running for sometime, but it's always struck me as an odd isue when more decisively principled battles could have been used.--Red Deathy 12:27, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

text: Well, it wasn't banned from use, just propaganda use, it was explicitly retained by the same resolution for legal purposes, just like the Conservative and Unionist Party is usually referred to as the conservative party, and some people shorten their given names by preference.  You're incorrect to say teh DoP was to be abanndoned, if I recall they are still in use.  I note you put scare quotes round undemocratic - are you disputing that, if so, what do you think happened? Anyway, we need to discuss how we're going to consensually get this into the article, any suggestions?--Red Deathy 07:53, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion