lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Celebrity Paranormal Project

message: I've....err, made a start. Not quite finished yet, but if anyone else has anything to add, please do. Can't say that i've seen this show, but i've tried to tighten up the article at any rate. Jammy simpson 17:33, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

message: KEEP - The article could use clean up but the show may become a popular like Ghost Hunters has proven popular. At least give it a chance and see what happens. Cyberia23 19:55, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Possible future notability is not a criterion for inclusion now.Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 20:23, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: delete? wth! i just watched this (actually only about 1/2) and left with so many questions that i went to wiki.  whoever suggested deletion was fairly mistaken, to put it nicely71.107.69.226 05:38, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion Voting

message: The statement that this is essentially the same show as MTV's Fear, except with celebrities, is not accurate. Fear producers did not, as far as I could tell, actively interfere with the participants as they were out doing their assignments, and no visual FX ghosts, shadows, etc., were added in post-production. With this new show, it's totally obvious that there are show producers hiding in the shadows, messing with the "celebrities". For example, in the episode in the hospital, balls were seen on the floor, that changed position each time the participants passed by. Hot and cold spots (and EMF spikes) are also obviously the work of humans behind the scenes, as are the sounds of whispering and footsteps. Fear was a far superior show, IMO, because the participants were allowed to get all freaked out on their own, without any external "help". Spoiledgradient 00:50, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  CPP vs. MTV's FEAR 

message: For a few weeks now, DirecTV has been putting the wrong summaries for CPP's episodes in their program guide. When they showed the episode with Gilbert Gottfried, they put the summary of the episode with Coolio and vice versa. Well, in this last episode they again put the wrong summary, and it said something like this: "Adrianne Curry, Chris Knight, and Danny and Gretchen Bonaduce investigate prison inmate deaths." I thought it was weird that they only listed four cast members instead of the usual five, but in the weeks they had mismatched summaries, the names of the cast members were correct, so that episode's team might just be made up of 4. Hope that helps. --Andresg770 03:17, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That describes episode 8, which according to VH1's website, will be a special "couples" edition, explaining the lack of an uneven number of players. Crazedgiggles 15:02, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last Episode's Unknown Celebrity Cast Members 

message: The link isn't going to the correct IMBD page. I tried fixing it, but when I tried adjusting it. It just goes to "Link Unknown." Not sure why it won't go to the correct page. Thor2000 (talk) 20:00, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: IMDB Link
Talk:All Nigeria Peoples Party

message: I have seen this party referred to as the All Nigeria Peoples Party, the All Nigeria Peoples' Party, and, less often than the other two spellings, the All Nigeria People's Party (which is what we have here).  The Nigerian Independant National Elections Commission gives their name as All Nigeria Peoples Party (no apostrophe).   The Government of Nigeria lists them the same way.    Unfortunately, the ANPP doesn't seem to have a website, as far as I can tell.  But with the Elections Commission and nigeria.gov.ng both giving it as All Nigeria Peoples Party, without an apostraphe, should this article perhaps be moved to that spelling?  Heather 23:53, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *I'll assume that there are no objections and proceed with the move now.  Heather 19:40, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

text: *:I'm a bit late to the discussion, but that seems prefectly reasonable. Picaroon 20:01, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name of this party

message: This article states:In February 2013 the party merged with the Action Congress of Nigeria, the All Progressives Grand Alliance, and the Congress for Progressive Change to form the All Progressives Congress.If this is true, than isn't this party defunct? Charles Essie (talk) 20:23, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Defunct?
Talk:Perversions of Science

message: I disambiguated patriot to patriotism, but I'm not sure if it would more properly be disambiguated to Patriot (American Revolution), since I don't know anything about the subject.  If the latter would be preferable, someone who knows more about it should change it. -- Anaraug 23:59, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation
Talk:Drop-in pitch

message: If this article is kept after AfD, I believe the title should be singular: "Drop-in pitch" not "Drop-in pitches". --Canley 00:00, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: (edit conflicted by move)I agree. Anyone else? Pitches are also dropped in at Telstra Dome and Marrara. I'm not sure whether/how this should be in the article. JPD (talk) 14:28, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article title
Talk:Chanoz-Châtenay

message: Phil Boswell (talk) has deliberately misindexed this article by including the character â in the indexing sort key, and has been requested to fix it.  See Wikipedia:Categorization for explanation of the sort keys and how they are to be used.  Gene Nygaard 00:02, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Phil Boswell has just deliberately messed it up again in this edit.  Gene Nygaard 14:34, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Misindexing
Talk:Patrick Thoresen

message: "....to have his testicles removed." was deleted because it is currently uncertain what the permanent consequences will be.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ducio1234 (talk • contribs) 18:27, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Just watched the Norwegian news, and it was confirmed that he did NOT have to remove a testicle or operate, which they had feared earlier. It was also one testicle that was injured and that they might have had to remove, and not both. GoogleMe (talk) 19:35, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Groin injury 

message: Any Norwegian speakers able to confirm that his name is natively spelled Thöresen?  I listened to the Norwegian video the Oilers posted last week, and it sounded very much like "Thöresen".  --68.145.53.204 00:10, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's not correct; it's spelled Thoresen. The letter ö is not part of the Norwegian alphabet. Zerblatt 19:54, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name spelling 
Talk:1969 Little League World Series

message: Are you sure Taipei won this?  I thought the winner was from Taitung.  I will check on this.  ludahai 魯大海 10:04, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A friend of mine has confirmed this.  Once I find a reliable link, I will change the page.  ludahai 魯大海 23:55, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taipei?
Talk:Character evidence

message: This article deals exclusively with the US and Canada as though character witnesses only existed there. They certainly exist in the UK, I think in Ireland, and probably in other common-law jurisdictions. How about some info on those? If I had the expertise, I'd add that myself now, but I simply don't know enough to be reliable. Loganberry (Talk) 00:13, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Globalize tag 

message: The page continually referred to the defendant as a she, so I changed it to say he or she.
173.52.233.180 (talk) 20:43, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changed from "She" to "He or she" 

message: This section appears, at worst, to be a machine translation or at best a direct cut/paste (without context) from some dense and impenetrable legal document. It talks (repeatedly) of "truthfulness of the defendant less than 10 years old".  Presumably it's not talking about a defendant who is less than 10 years of age, so possibly the "10 years old" refers to the "truthfulness" of the defendant. Quite how "truthfulness" can be more or less than a certain age is undisclosed. The entire section doesn't appear to add anything to the article and should be either translated into English or deleted. 86.159.115.161 (talk) 15:49, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I've deleted it (the previous IP was me, now using 213.122.91.244 following a router reboot) as it really made no sense at all. If reinstating please don't do so verbatim, please translate into English. Tonywalton Talk 00:26, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The "Felony Convictions" section
Talk:Triple Cities

message: This entire article is original research. Please see WP:No original research for more information. -newkai t-c 00:18, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Original research

message: I have made a proposal for a WikiProject for articles relating to Binghamton/Greater Binghamton/Triple Cities. If you are interested you can view it at:   WikiPedia:WikiProject_Council/Proposals#Binghamton
Cheesebox 08:50, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject proposal
Talk:Joe Millionaire

message: Can we get some of the review out of the season 2 section? Phil Sandifer 00:19, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Season 2 
Talk:17th Bombardment Group

message: As pointed out by User:Reedmalloy in May 2009 in this edit [], the 17th Training Group is not related to the 17th Bombardment Group.  The 17th Training Group only dates bask to 1 July 1978 when it was activated as the 3480th Technical Training Wing. It was subsequently redesignated as the 3480th Technical Training Wing (USAF Cryptological Training Center) on 3 January 1984, 3480th Technical Training Wing on 1 March 1985, 3480th Technical Training Group on 1 February 1992, and 391st Technical Training Group on 15 September 1992.  It received its current number as the 17th Technical Training Group on 1 July 1993 and has been the 17th Training Group since 1 April 1994.   I intend to move this article to 17th Bombardment Group after allowing a brief time for comment.  --Lineagegeek (talk) 20:36, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  17th Training Group is not the 17th Bombardment Group
Talk:Velocity stack

message: Motorhead, why would you be so disrespectful and completely whip out hours of work that was put into the updating of this article.  I felt I respected everyones content by leaving it present either verbatim or reworded.  You completely whipped out all my work, including legitimate references that give this article substance and external references to clarify and allow further research.  The original content was good but left many dead ends, such as where you get the flow coefficents from, "dynamic tuning range", "reverse megaphone", "dynamic tuning speed". --BryanPendleton (talk) 18:48, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

message: It's not clear from the article whether velocity stacks in cars normally go through the hood, as seen in supposed 'custom cars'. If so, does the reduction performance due to the loss of aerodynamic efficiency offset the gain from the increased engine breathing efficiency? Centrepull (talk) 06:03, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Effect on aerodynamics 

message: Just from an editing standpoint this article is terrible. There is no direction to it at all; It's just a whole bunch of random facts thrown on to a page. Sentences are strangely worded and don't make sense. Also the lack of references is disturbing.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.49.32.156 (talk) 21:36, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is extremely poorly written
Talk:Missing in Action (film)

message: I do not remember a scene with a rat, is that just spam?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.245.40.191 (talk) 03:15, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Rat? 

message: http://www.movieinsider.com/m7093/missing-in-action/ All it says is that it's set during the Iraq War. Spartan198 (talk) 07:09, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remake 

message: This movie came out one year before Rambo 2 did (1984 as opposed to First Blood 2 in 1985). Seeing as time travel is not a proven scientific reality yet I'm going to call that part of this article blatantly false. 2600:8804:1000:9000:F8EF:6D89:8844:F187 (talk) 06:51, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rambo: First Blood Part II-inspired?
Talk:Exterminator 2

message: http://web.archive.org/web/20000613222925/www.eventhorizon.com/sfzine/fiction/warhols_dracula/07.html
This has "an exterminator" who wields "a flamethrower" joining a group of vampire hunters. 
Enda80 22:53, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Kim Newman homage
Talk:Revenge of the Ninja

message: IMDB Lists "Nine Deaths of the Ninja" (1985) as the fourth film in this series.  Perhaps a fifth film? --Kalamitysax 14:37, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Fourth Film?"

message: The link to Mario Gallo goes to the wrong actor.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.197.236.23 (talk) 13:57, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong link for Mario Gallo 

message: The plot summary list that Cho moved his family and himself to Salt Lake City, Utah, however a flag at Kane's school shows the Californian flag. IMDB list this as an error in geography, citing...
"Even though the film takes place in California, every vehicle has a Utah license plate. "https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0086192/goofs/?tab=gf&ref_=tt_trv_gf#error_in_geography
Given the move never explicitly states the setting, besides American, nor does the specific setting play any specific role, I've changed the location to a move general "America".  Vampus (talk) 14:16, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cho moves to America
Talk:Mezentius

message: Would be nice to mention what is said in Book 8:
"Till curs'd Mezentius, in a fatal hour,
Assum'd the crown, with arbitrary pow'r.
What words can paint those execrable times,
The subjects' suff'rings, and the tyrant's crimes!
That blood, those murthers, O ye gods, replace
On his own head, and on his impious race!
The living and the dead at his command
Were coupled, face to face, and hand to hand,
Till, chok'd with stench, in loath'd embraces tied,
The ling'ring wretches pin'd away and died."
(Im not sure of the line reference, as I was just looking at the translation on wikisource).
Its a nice example of his cruelty, though I dont really know how to phrase it. Hpmons (talk) 23:59, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Book 8
Talk:Great Māhele

message: Some of the things in the earlier version (i.e. about the kuleana act) seemed to be outright wrong, and indeed conflicting with the reference given for it.  However, if someone has a reference feel free to put it back.  Something about the relative proportions that went to the crown, government, and chiefs would be good; there was a remark about it but it wasn't referenced and didn't seem to fit in, so I removed it.  KarlM 21:30, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:1840 Constitution of the Hawaiian Kingdom

message: Thank you for your changes. I do not disagree with anything you changed, but I still think there is more to add to this topic. 
*Location of where Constitution was written? 
*More elab. on whom the king was. 
*Why did they write this Constitution? 
*What impact did this Constitution have on Hawai'i? 
*Reason why this Constitution was changed only a year after 1939 Constitution? 
*Also, I think Constitution of 1939 is not even really listed under Hawai'i Constitutions (type in wiki search)?
* There is a audio file for the Constitution of 1940 (in native lang), might be interesting to implement this some where.
*Need some Images (Hawai’i Flag during this period if any, King pic, pic of central building, etc.) 
*What do you think about placing the real text above the explanation or translation?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Marcioen (talk • contribs) 03:37, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please feel free to expand the article.  I'm not sure what you mean by the real text, but if you mean the actual source, that should be added to the WikiSource page found here. —Viriditas | Talk 04:19, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  changes 

message: This contains the entire text of the document...that's not the point of an encyclopedic article.  This article needs to describe the document, not reproduce it.   03:14, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Viriditas (talk) 10:21, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Most of this belongs in Wikisource... 

message: What I would like to know is, is there anymore copies of the original constituion at Bishop Museum?--KAVEBEAR (talk) 20:43, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original copies 

message: Time to begin the clean up and massive rewrite of this article.--Mark Miller (talk) 02:36, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overhaul of article 
Talk:Ravi Belagere

message: In December 2010,Ravi Belaagere wrote a derogotory remarks on popular young right wing kannada journalist Pratap Simha in his weekly Hai Bangalore. This followed with the resignation of Vijaya Karnataka editor in chief Vishweswar Bhat, Pratap SImha and P. Thyagraj. This gave a death blow to the well established kannada daily. This article by Ravi is believed to be from Christian lobbyists paying a hefty amount of money him. Following the article,it appeared Ravi's image was tarnished.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.192.185.65 (talk) 15:24, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contreversy over Pratap Simha and Vijaya Karnataka
Talk:Jester (Marvel Comics)

message: "Another version of him appears in Marvel Adventures Spider-Man #27."
Marvel Adventures is not in 616 continuity, so this doesn't really belong in the Character biography of the 616 character.
Also, I read most of Civil War, including Amazing Spider-Man, Punisher, and Thunderbolts tie ins and I can not remember anything about a Jody Putt being in the Jester outfit.  However, I will consent that it is not explictly stated that it is Powers in the suit, so here is my plan:
1.  Remove the Jody Putt section as original research (unless someone can really find an issue number).
2.  Insert into Powers' fictional biography that "Someone in the Jester suit was shot by the Punisher in Civil War #6, though it is unknown who is using the Jester identity."  68.23.8.50 16:25, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean up Article

message: Adding on to my earlier edit, since we don't know if the Jester pictured in Civil War #4-5 is Powers, I think an image should be used that is certainly Powers, since he is the most well known Jester.  68.23.8.50 01:58, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture
Talk:Hanscom Air Force Base

message: This article is comprehensive, but there is not one citation/reference.--DrRisk13 03:41, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References?

message: I read  through the article and it seems it has way to much info in it about specific ESC accomplishments.  I think it should be broken up into another article.
Mikeb 17:29, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Break up the article?
Talk:Yarrawonga

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved   (t · c) buidhe 06:19, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Yarrawonga, Victoria →  – "Yarrawonga" already redirects to this article with a hatnote link to a disambigaution page. This is clearly the primary topic and the proposed title is consistent with WP:NCAUST. Indeed, the move isn't particularly controversial other that with editors with the mistaken belief that articles on Australian places should comply with WP:USPLACE, which is not the case. Mattinbgn (talk) 22:57, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 10 December 2021
Talk:Rocketplane XP

message: In the See also section the article says that the EADS project is a copy of this, which seemed a little unlikely to me.  The article about the EADS project also makes the same claim but has a citation needed tag, so I have added one here as well.
FerdinandFrog (talk) 16:49, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference to EADS Astrium Space Tourism Project

message: I'll see if we can use one under a fair use license. --Craigboy (talk) 08:26, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need Picture
Talk:Genet (biology)

message: With a personal interest in the animal genet, I have been looking up "genet" in dictionaries, encyclopedias, and the 'Net for the past twenty years, and have never seen this definition.  I am also familiar with the phenomenon this article describes, but have never seen it called a "genet."  I have therefore marked the article as one in need of verification.
Genetta 21:05, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

message: I have added a source reference and "de-listed" the page for verification. Paphrag 13:30, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference added 

message: Here are a few public articles which illustrate the use of the term "genet" in the botanical/ecological community:
http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2120/is_4_80/ai_54994052
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.0022-0477.2004.00878.x?journalCode=jec
http://www.iowalivingroadway.com/ResearchProjects/90-00-LRTF-300.asp
Paphrag 23:54, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional support 

message: Anyway I wanted to connect this page with our one (called genet), but I realized that you dont have nothink about, genets in mycology which is quite oftern word in the mycelia studies of mycorhizal symbiosis with pines.--Juan de Vojníkov 10:43, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genet in mycology
Talk:McCandless Method

message: It seems like this could be easily merged into the bio for McCandless. DJSparky (talk) 04:38, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  That article is not that long that the addition of this short one would overwhelm it.  As long as this become a redirect, I think that's fine. Ed Fitzgerald (unfutz) (talk / cont) 21:51, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've merged them, and coverted this into a redirect. Ed Fitzgerald (unfutz) (talk / cont) 04:53, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging with McCandless' Biography
Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2006-10-16/China unblock

message: ExplicitImplicity caught the People's Daily, the official newspaper of the Communist Party of China, plagiarizing from Wikipedia. Compare the Lyndon LaRouche article on July 8th 2005 to Global financial crisis is coming, which was published on November, 22nd 2005 (that appears to be the day it was published based upon the url and it was updated later the same day). The reporter copied the introduction almost exactly. Wikipedia was blocked from China when the article was published, but the writer, Yong Tang, was based in Washington D.C., so it was not necessary to bypass the Great Firewall. I saved the web page, with all of its files, in case it is removed. -- Kjkolb 01:19, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The official newspaper of the Communist Party of China plagiarized Wikipedia
Talk:Igor (film)

message: Just wanted to explain some edits I made, to avoid clogging up the edit summary.
Whether one agrees that this description applies to George Bush, it is undeniably something that his critics have alleged.
I got rid of this because it doesn't belong in the article, it seems to be someone making commentary to justify the previous statement.
More directly, at one point Dr. Schadenfreude says to Igor, "You're either with us or against us," something Bush famously said in a press conference.
Actually, Shadenfreude said "you're either with me or against me".  My edit is more accurate, but a little clumsy, cleanup would be appreciated.
After the climax, a TV reporter asks Igor about his plans for the new administration, and what he will do to correct the abuses of the previous administration.
Uh... no, Cristall asked if pants would be as uncomfortable and expensive as during the previous administration.  Yes, the purpose of this gag was probably what the above statement alleges, but it's not quite what he said, and drawing a conclusion from it would be speculative.  Baleted! 68.146.218.97 (talk) 19:06, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  edits