lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Voices of the Lifestream

message: While I realize that each musician put a lot of hard work into this project and deserves to be recognized, I feel that Wikipedia is not the proper place to do it. The adder invoked Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums#Personnel but I feel that that does not properly describe what the list currently consists of. Also, the spirit of that guideline does not and should not encompass the sheer number of composers involved. As well, that guideline specifically refers to musicians, and not composers. Ultimately, though, it is repeated better at the project's own website with individual bios rather than this list which really doesn't name notable individuals and consists of a bunch of names that might as well be anonymous. Axem Titanium (talk) 00:46, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personnel 

message: Thanks for the recent help guys. There is still some citation issues that need to be resolved. The Pelit review is missing a citation link or reference; this is pretty important in establishing worldwide professional media coverage of a seemingly "small unnoticeable" tribute album. Also, when I wrote the first draft of this article and was looking for references, I ran across djpretzel in a, OC Remix forum talking about the success of the album and how people thought the album had too many "electronic" pieces. I cant remember where it was, but it would fulfill the citation for the last statement in the Reception section. The article is looking great so far, thanks. Noj r (talk) 00:53, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations

message: *I don't think the Reception section image is needed
*Practice on album articles is to have no refs in the infobox. The professional reviews ones aren't necessary as you also have the link there
*"numerous video game sites[1] " - need some form of punctuation under the ref
*"endeavor by OCR" - what's OCR?
*Are the links in the Music video competition section copyvios?
*"downloaded project to date" - competing against what? Other OC Remix projects? If so, say so
*Anything on Metacritic?
*Ref 14: USA Today goes in italics. Check other refs for newspapers and things like that
Leave a note on my talk page when done. Cheers, dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 10:37, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed everything! Looked on Metacritic and it doesn't seem like they have anything. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 13:06, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Deleted a rogue ref in the infobox. Also, thank you for taking care of this article Judgesurreal. -- Noj r (talk) 22:06, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: GAN on hold
Talk:Robyn Malcolm

message: Malcolm's DOB was previously listed in her full bio from her agency profile . The DOB was added with this edit, the agency bio appears to have been subsequently updated 7 September 2009. The New Zealand Herald has her turning 45 between a Oct 3, 2009 article and a Mar 21, 2010 one. XLerate (talk) 10:10, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: We can't add something like this without a verifiable source, per WP:BLP. If you can find a valid source, feel free to readd it; you can readd the age if you wish. Stifle (talk) 08:16, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It was verifiable when it was added, in December 2007. I would have copied and pasted the date from the profile, to reduce the possibility of a typo. There is a Stuff.co.nz article giving age 44 on 3/1/2010, so I would like the year restored. XLerate (talk) 12:48, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of birth

message: Should this article be protected? There have been a number of defamatory edits over the past couple of days.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.184.32.124 (talk) 10:20, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: One person was blocked for making those edits. The edits have stopped. Any repeats will lead to blocks without further warnings being issued. Not protecting the article leaves it open to genuine attempts at improvement.-gadfium 18:11, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protection
Category talk:Parents' organizations

message: Hi - I wasn't trying to revert-war with Cgingold about categorizing this cat in :Category:Occupational organizations; I simply had forgotten that I had done it previously, so when I saw that it wasn't there I didn't look at the edit history before adding it. ... Regardless, it seems to me that parenting is the full-time occupation of some people, so it seemed like a reasonable occupational category. Thoughts? --Lquilter (talk) 12:34, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Categorizing
Talk:Combat Aircraft Systems Development & Integration Centre

message: , we should probably keep the mention of K. G. Narayanan, even with the  tag, as he was the first director and headed the organisation for 16 years. I don't see a need to keep the rest except the current director. I found a partial ref for the Narayanan's term and I'll keep looking for a better one. —Gazoth (talk) 05:53, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: - okay, thank you! :) starship.paint (talk) 05:54, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

text: - check the article, I found primary sources, but that's better than nothing :) starship.paint (talk) 08:24, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: , I think primary sources are fine for unexceptional claims like these. —Gazoth (talk) 15:25, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Directors
Talk:Virtual actor

message: this ref: "Siggraph 2005 Digital Face Cloning Course Notes" is currently a link to a google cache page. It will probably disapear pretty soon, as the original content is already gone. While the text is still here, it would be good if we can use the still accesable text to find other refs that will (hopefully) be more persistent. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 12:38, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Is there an internet archive page?  --Thinboy00 @236, i.e. 04:40, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ref
Talk:William Thorold (engineer)

message: Not a complete nobody, several Google hits and internal WP links. Should merit at least a stub article. Hqb (talk) 12:40, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added categories and a stub (not sure it's the right one though). Hope it was all right to do this. Cheers Paul20070 (talk) 12:49, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

text: I think we could probably remove the stub now. I also hope you won't mind if I do a bit of tweaking to the headings. Paul20070 (talk) 14:13, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

text: Good job. I agree that the stub tag can be removed. On the other hand, it would be good if more of the information could be explicitly referenced to reliable, published sources, rather than just the norfolkmills.co.uk page, whose very first paragraph claims that the subject lived 1827-1851. Hqb (talk) 14:31, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

text: Ah, my mistake on reading the Norfolk Mills bio. (Still, it's not exactly obvious that the dates in the title refer to active years.) Anyway, I've added his birth/dates and a few additional details from the obituary in Proc. Inst. Civil Eng. Hqb (talk) 15:27, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Contested speedy deletion
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject World Heritage Sites/Assessment

message: Simply add the  with the article name as a parameter as a level four heading under the appropriate heading, along with a reason for the importance rating. If no objections are raised within a week the rating can be set to that level.
===Top===
========
This article is a must-have for any encyclopaedia. It documents the Great Barrier Reef, the largest coral reef system in the world, can be seen from space, and is the largest single structure built by living organisms. Jame§ugrono 12:40, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: When I added the template, I assigned it low importance. It can go up to mid importance at most I think since it is not that important. Top importance seems a little excessive. Chris! ct 20:29, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussions about Importance Ratings

message: ========
This article is a must-have for any encyclopaedia. It documents the Great Barrier Reef, the largest coral reef system in the world, can be seen from space, and is the largest single structure built by living organisms. Jame§ugrono 12:40, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: When I added the template, I assigned it low importance. It can go up to mid importance at most I think since it is not that important. Top importance seems a little excessive. Chris! ct 20:29, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Top

message: This article is a must-have for any encyclopaedia. It documents the Great Barrier Reef, the largest coral reef system in the world, can be seen from space, and is the largest single structure built by living organisms. Jame§ugrono 12:40, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: {{la|Great Barrier Reef}}

message: This article has been assigned High importance within most other projects. However, within World Heritage Sites, being a barrier reef of note should make it top - it apparently comes second after the Great Barrier Reef. I'm not sure whether Top is right though, because if we do it by my logic, where do we draw the line? The top 3? 5? 10? 100? But, if no-one objects, I'll assign it Top importance in a week. Jame§ugrono 12:52, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: When I added the template, I assigned it low importance. It can go up to mid importance at most I think since it is not that important. Top importance seems a little excessive. Chris! ct 20:29, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: {{la|Belize Barrier Reef}}

message: The importance scale seriously needs to be fixed.  Many of the most important sites, such as Great Wall, Machu Picchu, Forbidden City are rated as mid-importance?  While sites such as Mount Tai, Terracotta Army are low-imporance?  Who gives the criteria?
I also think the importance scale really doesn't apply here, or needs to be re-adjusted, since I'm sure UNESCO regards all of the 800 World Heritage Sites as equally important, equally deserving of protection and recognition.--Balthazarduju (talk) 04:29, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The Importance Scale
Template talk:DRDO Laboratories

message: I suggest keeping the abbreviations till the article is created. It aided in article and link creation, since it would give the editors an idea of whether to create a redirect or a disambiguation link. T/@Sniperz11editssign 14:20, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link Expansion 

message: I propose making template horizontal (eg Template IIT) and that it should be added at the bottom of related pages (eg Indian Institutes of Technology) - abhi (talk) 09:36, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. It meddles with the Infobox on most pages. I'll go ahead and make the changes per WP:BRD. utcursch | talk 05:05, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Format
Talk:Advanced Numerical Research and Analysis Group

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://pib.nic.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=102740. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Diannaa (talk) 00:38, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Category talk:Human rights organizations

message: Certainly agree with the merger. In practice the phrase ":Category:Human rights bodies" is not well-distinguished here from :Category:Human rights organizations" I'd suggest, however, that :Category:Human rights bodies is a little different in meaning and not quite as clear as :Category:Human rights organizations. Thoughts? --Lquilter (talk) 12:44, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: * Then do you support one over the other? --Lquilter (talk) 02:14, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: * Well, most other categories use "organizations", so I'd go with that. thisisace 00:14, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

text: * Okay, done; I proposed it at CFD (link). --Lquilter 17:56, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger
Talk:Compugraphic

message: This company was an important name in the development of computer typesetting and desktop publishing, but it is little remembered now.  I was a little surprised to see that it has no article, however.  I've created a very small and (sadly) uninformative stub for now but I'll expand it very quickly as soon as I have the material. --Tony Sidaway 12:50, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: History

message: I WAS AN EMPLOYEE FROM THE LATE 70'S TO MID 80'S HOW DUE I TRACK ANY RETIREMENT FUNDS, OR 401K'S/
If anyone can help me with this please contact me at feeleyrdp@verizon.net.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.76.183.96 (talk) 19:49, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  retirement funds or pensions
Talk:Peripheral myelin protein 22

message: Hi all! I am planning on expanding this article for my Advanced Genetics course at the University of Western Ontario. Let me know if you have any suggestions DaamoonGhahari (talk) 19:55, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: — Assignment last updated by Jellyfish829 (talk) 11:29, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Molecular Genetics
Talk:Rancho Guajome Adobe

message: HABS photos (public domain) available to upload.  Also, 7 of the NRHP photos were taken by NPS employee, so also can be used. doncram (talk) 13:03, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo uploads needed

message: These are two different articles.  One is about the land grant (and has its own template) and the other is the historic adobe which has its own historic landmark template.  This is consistent with other land grants / adobes :Rancho Petaluma and :Rancho Petaluma Adobe. Emargie (talk) 13:17, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Rancho Guajome Adobe & Rancho Guajome
Talk:Trichlorosilane

message: Properties
  
General
  Name
  Trichlorosilane
  Chemical formula
  HSiCl3
  Appearance
  Colourless liquid
  
Physical
  Molar mass
  135.5 g/mol
  Melting point
  146 K (-127 °C)
  Boiling point
  305 K (32 °C)
  Density
  1.34 ×10³ kg/m³ (liquid)
  Solubility
  decomposes in water
  
Thermochemistry
  ΔfH0gas
  -496.22 kJ/mol
  ΔfH0liquid
  ? kJ/mol
  ΔfH0solid
  ? kJ/mol
  S0gas, 1 bar
  313.72 J/mol·K
  S0liquid, 1 bar
  ? J/mol·K
  S0solid
  ? J/mol·K
  
Safety
  Ingestion
  May cause nausea, vomiting, kidney damage.
  Inhalation
  May cause burning in chest, dizziness, pulmonary edema, cardiac irregularity, kidney damage.
  Skin
  Possible burns, especially on wet skin.
  Eyes
  Produces burning and tearing with possible cornea damage.
  More info
  Hazardous Chemical Database
SI units were used where possible. Unless otherwise stated, standard conditions were used.
Disclaimer and references
I'm putting the old-style chembox here because I've put a Chembox New in the article.
Ben (talk) 13:24, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old chembox
Talk:Harada House

message: Considering that this house marks the site of a landmark case decision regarding California land laws, I believe it would be appropriate to provide a description of the actual case, California v. Harada, as well as a mention of the precedents the case set for future challenges to legal property in California. Additional detail which could be added to the article are further descriptions of the life of the Haradas and their move to the U.S. I've compiled a list of possible sources that could help with some of these additions:
:Possible sources
:https://www.nps.gov/subjects/aapiheritage/upload/Harada_House.pdf
:https://npgallery.nps.gov/pdfhost/docs/NHLS/Text/77000325.pdf
:https://www.nps.gov/nr/travel/asian_american_and_pacific_islander_heritage/Harada-House.htm
:http://articles.latimes.com/2007/sep/04/local/me-harada4
::(Peer Review) I agree that you should add the appropriate court case regarding the article, since it gives a deeper understanding of how Harada House came to be. You might want to consider adding the current state of the House beyond the article's latest mention of the 2004 handover of the House, as well as adding more illustrative images that can give the readers a visual aid of how the house looked in the past and in the present. Ferrarix5a (talk) 00:05, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Planned contributions
Talk:SymbOS

message: What licence is it?--Darrelljon (talk) 13:38, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

message: I think the term "microkernel" is misused throghout the article. I doubt SymbOS kernel components work with IPC, which would allow us to replace a kernel component such as "memory manager" with a different one without recompiling the OS. I don't think SymbOS has the concept of user mode/kernel mode either since Z80 itself lacks such mechanisms.
I'm replacing references to "microkernel"s with "very small kernel" in the article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by SSG (talk • contribs) 02:37, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The SymbOS kernel includes the three essential components  of a microkernel: memory management, thread handling and inter-process communication (messaging), not more or less. Examples like the first Minix versions show, that memory protection is not a pre-condition for a micro-kernel. JohnLongSilver (talk) 09:38, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Microkernel 

message: What about the "symb os" on the tv series Fringe? --95.34.5.74 (talk) 02:12, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Refer to the policy on this. 73.164.9.46 (talk) 19:01, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fringe 
Talk:Straight-five engine

message: Reading the article it's not apparent what the crankshaft of a straight-5 looks like.
I recall having it described by someone once as being like that of a 4 - except there's an extra middle crank sticking out sideways. This would imply an uneven fire engine, probably with crank angles of 0, 151, 255, 151, 0 (with #1 at TDC #2 is close to, but not at, BDC and #3 is close to, but not quite, half way). The firing times are then 151, 104, 104, 151, 208 with a 1 4 3 5 2 order.
However everything I've found while looking into this implies that straight-5 engines always use crank angles of 0, 72, 144, 216, 288 - and no attempt made to achieve any kind of dynamic balance at all, although even firing is acheived, probably with a firing order 1 3 5 2 4 and a power stroke every 144 degrees.
I don't know anyone who owns a straight 5, but could those of you who have seen the crank please note here what engine and what it was like?  Thanks Number774 (talk) 21:58, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crank Angles 

message: marking this for heavy revisal, the information in this section has little to do with the 5 cilinder and more to do with acoustics in general. --2601:248:C100:1C45:18FC:31DD:2FC8:3732 (talk) 07:55, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sound 

message: I feel this whole paragraph is too wordy and it needs some serious pruning to become more concise. Arrivisto (talk) 13:27, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Smoothness
Talk:Interpersonal circumplex

message: The very first sentence of Leary Circumplex says it is now more known as Interpersonal Circumplex, even linking to this article. I do not know the subject but it seems to me the subjects are identical. If this is the more common name, I guess the other article should be merged here. // habj (talk) 13:50, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

message: could someone possibly upload an image of the leary circumplex similar to the image of the Maslow triangle as seen here []
thanks a bunchTlatseg (talk) 15:16, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  request for image of the Leary wheel aka circumplex 

message: A reference corresponding to the first citation (Wiggins, 2003) is missing.  This is also the case for the later Wiggins (1995) citation.  // Alousybum (talk) 08:17, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference cleanup
Talk:Gabriel's Message

message: Gabriel's message contains one of the most widely known Mondegreens in the canon of Christmas carols. The substitution of "Most highly flavoured gravy...pour it here" (for "most highly favoured lady, gloria") was made famous in an advertising campaign. (If memory serves, it was for Oxo, in the mid 1990s) — Preceding unsigned comment added by  81.187.40.226 (talk • contribs) 08:53, November 17, 2007 (UTC)
*I remember singing this in a choir in Nova Scotia and during our practices we would often substitute the 'most highly flavoured gravy' but I had no idea about the Oxo campaign.  On another note, would it be OK to add another recording link?  This one: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S0pffBfHC1U  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tgrignon (talk • contribs) 02:35, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Is it too trivial to include the following here?

message: Not that is really matters to me either way, but I've never seen the song listed as "Gabriel's Message" on concert programs--especially for Lessons and Carols Services before Christmas.  I have always seen it listed as "The Angel Gabriel" or "The Angel Gabriel from Heaven came".  Not being familiar with Basque or its translation, is there any prevailing reason why the current title is being used? --ColonelHenry (talk) 22:38, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: The article's name
Category talk:Actors from Chicago

message: There are two ways to determine if an actor belongs in this category:
1) The actor was born in Chicago.
2) The actor was not born in Chicago, but lived in Chicago for a period of time.
Which method is applied here? 
Also, I see a few names are followed by the word (actor) in parentheses.  Why is this necessary if by the definition of the list, every name is that of an actor?
Cosmo1976 (talk) 14:12, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sheep Ahoy

message: As of  06/03.08 this article has undergone slight vandalism, I'm reverting now and will chase up ASAP.
Scanna (talk) 18:31, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  All vandalism done by anonymous IPs, alas. Such is the way of life. I think it's all been excised, but I'll check other SDW cartoons and have a look-see.
Scanna (talk) 18:35, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism
Talk:1995–96 Manchester United F.C. season

message: I do all transfers according to Soccerbase, so I believe these transfers belong in this article. We need to get a common transfers rule going on all season articles, either according to soccerbase or after a certain date. André© (talk) 14:38, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that the season runs from 1 July in one year to 30 June of the following year. Therefore, I believe that only transfers that happened between 1 July 1995 and 30 June 1996 should be included in this article. – PeeJay 14:49, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Transfers after June 30 1996
Talk:Glossohyal

message: The problem is not that it doesn't have content, the problem is that it has no context. Try creating this at Wiktionary; it would be a more appropriate place. --Agüeybaná 14:50, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems you are wrong on your theory ! Chessy999 (talk) 10:18, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reply to the {{tl|hangon}}
Talk:Dipodinae

message: Hi, in 1817 it can't be Gustav Fischer (1848-1886) the authority linked as G.Fischer in the Taxobox. In the case of Dipodinae and Cricetidae, see Johann Fischer von Waldheim (1771-1853) . --Salixen (talk) 15:24, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fischer