Talk:Champions of Regnum

message: This article is not about a website, blog, online forum, podcast or similar web that does not assert the importance or significance of its subject. It is about an online game. The fact that the game is not as massive and known as other games of the genre does not mean it is less important to people who read Wikipedia, and it definitely not means it should be deleted.
:This article qualifies for speedy deletion because it is about "web content" and it "does not assert the importance or significance of its subject" (see ).  Pan Dan 14:20, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Gosh, I really don't think that's policy.  Wikipedia gets bombarded with tons of inappropriate articles, which is why we have the speedy deletion procedure.  And speedy means speedy -- we want to get rid of it as soon as possible with as little headache as possible.  When you create an article in the future, please say why the subject you're writing about is notable or show it's notable by providing some outside sources that have written about it.  Pan Dan 14:20, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

text: First, please stop accusing me of saying things I never said or even remotely implied.  I never said I don't find the article interesting; I never said this is "rubbish" or "useless"; I never said I don't like this game.  Second, notability is not "subject to interpretation".  As I said in my previous comment, to show that something is notable you need to show that outside sources have taken note of it.  Anyway, asserting notability is even easier; all you have to do is write something like "Regnum Online has had a lot of influence in the online gaming community" (if that's true, but it may not be true in this case) -- then the article would not qualify for speedy deletion.  Third, I was not "imposing my point of view" as you suggest -- I was following Wikipedia policy on speedy deletion.  An online game is web content, despite your claim otherwise.  Please try to understand Wikipedia policies on notability and deletion (see WP:CSD and WP:WEB) before accusing me of "imposing my point of view."  Fourth, I suggest you go to the AfD discussion and ask for userfication if the article is deleted.  Finally, I understand you were insulted by my speedy tag, but I was never impolite or unfriendly as you suggest.  By contrast, your comments above seem rather heated -- please cool it down, stop putting words in my mouth, and try to understand Wikipedia policies -- after that, if you still believe the article should be kept, go to the AfD discussion and add your voice there.  Pan Dan 15:55, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

text: Apology accepted.  See you around Wikipedia!  Pan Dan 17:55, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Whoever added the external links needs to 1)learn how to copy and paste URL's, and 2)update the current ones that contain "..."; those URL's translate to nothing,  so in essence ARE NOTHING! --Notmyhandle 20:45, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead Links 

message: The infobox has the ESRB rating as AO, and the source link has no info on why that is...anyone know why?  I'd find that incredibly surprising, considering how few games are rated AO. --PresN 22:49, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know why, but I have sent an inquiry to the reference.  Probably it is wrong and will be corrected soon enough. --Notmyhandle 23:15, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  AO? 

message: Minimum 800 mhz jumps to a recommended 3.0 ghz?  That's quite a jump..
--Josh1billion 02:09, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  System requirements 

message: The game reminds of the mmorpg DAoC,
nearly like a free clone.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.130.216.193 (talk) 21:58, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dark Age of Camelot 

message: I will remove the not notable warning for the following reasons:
* The game has multiple websites, available in multiple languages, that means its widely played by linux users
* The content is cited
* The game is featured in big websites, like mmosite or gamershell. Also, many, and various reviews exists.
* The warning is old, so the discussion
* The game isn't tagged as not notable in other wikipedias
in b4 replacing the tag, please write down your cited reasons here, at the talk page, kthxbye
--Drhlajos (talk) 08:23, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of notablity template 

message: How is "Realms Online" related to Regnum Online? Just another name for same game?
Why are there two separate web pages for them?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.176.210.14 (talk) 10:24, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Realms Online 

message: Please do the following changes: Move page under name Champions of Regnum. Replace "Regnum Online" with "Champions of Regnum" or "Champions of Regnum (formerly Regnum Online)". Remove references to Realms Online. 80.223.176.204 (talk) 14:16, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move page to Champions of Regnum 

message: Removed a broken link to a review and the two opinions of the review (as the citation can no longer be found). Also added section regarding steam launch. In future this may need expanding if/when they  relaunch on steam (I believe this was discussed by the developers on the forum, but I'm unable to find the link).
Much more citation is needed throughout the page, I'll highlight a few areas:
In order the promote intensity and smoothness of combat, the developers deliberately reduced the graphics detail.
The differences between the races of the three realms is cosmetic as all share the same character classes and powers
FraserJamesRobinson (talk) 21:46, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quick clean up and update (2020) 

message: Relevant to the history of this game. Atlantic306 (talk) 00:17, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of Regnum (video game) into Champions of Regnum