Talk:Ann Widdecombe

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Ann Widdecombe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110809231624/http://www.pipnjay.org/people/history/341-tribute-to-malcolm-widdecombe to http://www.pipnjay.org/people/history/341-tribute-to-malcolm-widdecombe
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20150227005100/http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/profiles/ann-widdecombe-mp--an-unlikely-agony-aunt-754932.html to http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/profiles/ann-widdecombe-mp--an-unlikely-agony-aunt-754932.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110607074724/http://www.newstatesman.com/200407120003 to http://www.newstatesman.com/200407120003
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120626053333/http://archive.catholicherald.co.uk:80/article/23rd-october-2009/1/atheist-duo-convince-crowd-that-the-church-is-not- to http://archive.catholicherald.co.uk/article/23rd-october-2009/1/atheist-duo-convince-crowd-that-the-church-is-not-
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:29, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: My edits to this section were reverted by User:Xxanthippe. I really dislike “also in 2002...” etc grammatically, and just find this section doesn’t read very well in terms of dates. — TrottieTrue (talk) 09:06, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Media appearances

message: Is An Act of Treachery (Orion, 2003) really "set during the Holocaust"? I have not read it, but all of the online reviews I've seen suggest it is set in Paris, between 1941 and 1944? Here's a link to the book online. Martinevans123 (talk) 14:36, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''An Act of Treachery?'' 

message: I repeat my edit commentary here: "Fringe views of those better known for other achievements or incidents should not be given undue prominence". Unless we can quote reliable sources having called her out for holding those stupid opinions, we should not give those ideas more air than they deserve
@User:Xxanthippe: So you disagree with what the guideline WP:FRINGEBLP says? Then you should try to get it changed. Until you succeed, we have to follow it. "She holds these views" is not a reason for us to repeat them. What I said on Talk:Thomas Sowell holds here too:
 --Hob Gadling (talk) 09:59, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Comment: I agree with that as the content stands; as you say, unless you can cite reliable sources discussing this, then her views shouldn't be given undue prominence. The National has a very brief section discussing Widdecombe and other Brexit Party MPs for climate change denial () which may be helpful, and it is worth noting that groups such as DeSmog () and Carbon Brief () have written pieces also calling out Ann Widdecombe's denialist views, so it considered notable to these groups. But I don't know whether that is enough to include in this article. --Bangalamania (talk) 14:25, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fringe views