Talk:Malik

message: The reference to yugioh really adds clarity to the whole article, keep up the good work Wikipedia  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.208.202.214 (talk) 00:35, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Miscellaneous 

message: I may easily be mistaken, but shouldn't the Arabic form given in parentheses be simply "ملك", without the definite article (-ال)?  When so prefixed, as the article itself indicates, it refers exclusively to God ("the King"), not the more general, "human" concept.  Or at least that's my understanding.  Keldan 09:13, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Arabic form: الملك or ملك

message: The description of Malik states:
: Malik is a word that means "king" in Arabic, also adopted in various other oriental languages, also in derived meanings. 
It should be clarified. Any suggestions ?
Siddiqui 14:29, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oriental Languages ? 

message: Melik may be merged with Malik, finally leaving only Malik. The Russian usage of Melik may also be accomodated with Malik -- AltruismTo talk 10:02, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, that's what I propose. Grandmaster 10:21, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Melik]] may be merged into [[Malik]], not the other way

message: Is the name of the Mamluk related? --84.20.17.84 14:34, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: they share the same root.  both are from the root m-l-k, which indicates owning.  A malik is called so because (in concept) he owns the land, while mamluk literally means "one that is onwned" i.e., a slave.  The mamluks are called so because they where originally slaves. --Maha Odeh 12:34, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mamluk 

message: I would like to request all Jews to stop adding non related information on this Malik article as well. This Malik article is based on Arabic and Mughal point of view in Malik. 
This article is based on Arabic meaning of Malik. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.237.253.131 (talk) 18:51, January 10, 2008
:This is an article about a word. It's appropriate to mention other words that are related to the subject word, including Persian and Hebrew. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 00:15, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The IP address is clearly expressing a bias that interferes with their ability to be objective, evidenced by the assumption that editors who restore the deleted material are "Jews." Pairadox (talk) 00:20, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Jews in Arabic articles

message: The Yazidi name for God's primary form, Tawûsê Melek, is not related to the word malik "king", but is rather a borrowing from another, similar-appearing but totally unrelated Arabic word, malak "messenger, angel". The Aramaic and Hebrew cognates are both mal'akh; the hamza was lost in Meccan Arabic and therefore the terms appear similar. However, it is a coincidence. He is the Peacock Angel, not "King Peacock". ناهد/(Nåhed) speak! 20:23, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Tawûsê Melek

message: On 17th Feb: I added the reference section to this article where there was none . 
On 22nd January: I added the only verifiable content with citations on this article .
On 6 August  user  Shanti bhai  deletes the verifiable content I provided . 
Note it is still only one of the two verifiable contents in the entire article . He comments while deleting cited content
Have replaced sentence, tidy up (if one tribe is mentioned, then all should be mentioned which would use up too much space for a singular point.
If this were not strange enough  
On  18th August: user Apostolos Margaritis   reintroduces  a spurious content and citation into the article , from the Multan Gazetteer of 1923  which provides page 139(Page 139 of this book does not mention Pakistan or this quote) and says  In Pakistan this surname is also used by wealthy landowners owners  
But Pakistan did not exist in 1923 .
Till 24th August Shanti bhai has no problem with a bogus  citation .
Shanti bhai is introducing selective  citation  requests on scores of articles and  deleting citations from other wikipedia articles  .
Why ?? 
Shanti bhai also seems to be using various sock puppets . 
Cheers 
Intothefire (talk) 17:52, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Shanti_bhai Shanti bhai] deletes  one out of the only two verifiable content with citations  on this article

message: In Inuit "Eksimo" Greenlandic, the word Malik means following:
1) Wave, the Wave
2) It also is used as a name, Though the meaning is still the same as 1)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.83.0.228 (talk) 16:28, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Malik 

message: Maalik or marlik?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.164.147.213 (talk) 22:19, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation? 

message: Would it be appropriate to also mention Meluhha, Malay, Mel and Latin mal?Rich (talk) 11:38, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Mention is made of [[Maluku islands]] as possibly relevant in the article...

message: As per common sense I have removed the following sentence, which would appear to make no sense at all:
:::::Just like Shah and Pahlavi titles used in India as well as Iran; the Malik titles signify common Indo-Iranian languages in India and Iran.
What is meant here? I don't have a clue, and I welcome any improvement.
Accusativen hos Olsson (talk) 20:57, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unintelligible sentence in lead 

message: my name Ghulam Yasin 
             S/O 
Karim Bux  BYE CATE MALIK 
KARIM BUX 
S/O ALLAH JEWAYO(PAHLWAN KHAN)
S/O GHULAM HYHER S/O MUHAMMAD YOUSIF IN VILAGE DISTT:KASHMORE@KANDH KOT HAMMID KHAN MALIK(THORE BAND) AND GHARHE TEGHO DISTT:SHEIKARPUR.
OMLY ME
I AM DISTT PRESIDENT AWAMI NATIONAL PARTY(ANP) KASHMORE AND SELECET ME ANP SINDH IN ELECTION2013.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.160.119.226 (talk) 16:41, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  MALIK 

message: Malik is one of the largest clan of jat. Malik is found in all religions hindu Muslim sikh. They are landlord and landowner. 223.189.18.17 (talk) 19:34, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: And your WP:Reliable sources for those claims are? - Arjayay (talk) 19:59, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Malik