lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Crime in Western Australia

message: I'm thinking this should be moved to Crime in Western Australia.  It would be inconsistent with Crime in Sydney and Crime in Melbourne though.  Any thoughts? -- Moondyne ≡ talk 08:51, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: As no-one objected, it's now moved. -- Moondyne ≡ talk 13:39, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Move

message: In the process of cleaning up Sword Boys, I have compiled some reason on other perth gangs: User:Jayvdb/Crime in Perth.  I am not sure whether all of these street gangs require their own article; would it be appropriate for each street gang to be mentioned briefly here first?  John Vandenberg 13:56, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Street gangs 

message: Probably mention him? It was even one of the top 6 o'clock news stories on tv. here in *New Zealand*! We very rarely get crime way over in Perth mentioned here, thus must be quite big. Links: http://www.watoday.com.au/wa-news/freeway-car-chase-endangers-motorists-20100317-qerw.html http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/national/injured-alleged-car-jacker-colin-little-escapes-from-hospital-after-police-chase/story-e6frf7l6-1225842309946 http://www.perthnow.com.au/news/car-jacking-escapee-colin-little-on-the-run-in-swanbourne/story-e6frg12c-1225842317979 Mathmo Talk 05:38, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colin Bradley Little 

message: It seems to me that there is very low interest and work going into this article. The template at foot indicates that no other Australian state has a corresponding article, only the NT (and that, too, is very sketchy and uncomprehensive). I would suggest that we put both articles up for deletion--they are unencyclopedic and have negative value unless properly detailed and documented. Cheers, Bjenks (talk) 04:00, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I've started doing a bit of a tidy-up of the structure of articles about crime by state, and although this one is still pretty thin, a couple of the others are being more actively worked on and I'm hoping that someone might get to this one sometime... Many of the citations are dead links and there's a bit of tidying to do before re-building. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 07:14, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why keep this article? 
Talk:Škoda Fabia

message: How is a link to a random blog about the fabia vrs more relevant than a forum that skoda owners can seek help and advice from as well as tons of information? Take the article about the Volkswagen Golf for example, it has external links to just about every Volkswagen forum there is! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volkswagen_Golf#External_links  Apinner (talk) 20:14, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed those. My suggestion: if you find another links like that, just remove them. Dekisugi (talk) 23:09, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Links

message: Converter is working wrong: currently in information about 1.9 SDI engine 47 kW is converted to 63 hp (should be 64 hp). Marcinw2
, I think its working ok? these hps are us hps... not European ones, which is PS used here in englsih wikipedia  --Typ932 T·C 00:35, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Its preferred to have PS (metric horsepower) in European manufactured cars, you can change those hp to PS if you are sure they are metric horsepower, those conversion templates can also show both if needed/wanted even bhp (british) can be shown
*Power
Template                           	Result
      	
	
 	
	
	
--Typ932 T·C 14:56, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong converter 

message: What about the WRC participation of Skoda? There should be added something about it. Emerge.life 11:24, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Skoda Fabia WRC 

message: can someone include the new RS and vRS models and the difference between them? I'm confused! --81.156.224.97 (talk) 19:12, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  RS / vRS? 

message: I have the impression that the coding for the third generation Skoda Fabia is '6V' rather than 'NJ' as cited in the article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by LeonCR (talk • contribs) 08:31, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Typ' third generation 

message: Fabia is from the name of sister of Fabius Derwydd74 (talk) 03:16, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fabia
Talk:Yun-seong (Soul)

message: :Add any additional comments:
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.</div>
Please do not move this page back - there is nothing "anti-korean' about making all Soul Calibur characters' articles match. There has been a discussion on this to name article titles after their most common name - and Yun-seong's first name is not mentioned enough in the games. He is announced as simply Yun-seong/Yun-Sung throughout the series.Mr.bonus 14:06, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: On the Soul Calibur 4 website, a profile for Yun-Seong is up but what does it say in English? SuperSaiyanCrash 7:25, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: SC4 Biography

message: Article claims he wasn't in Soul calibur 2, but in my copy at least, Yunsung is there (spelling as in game, SC2, PAL version) anyone want to fix it or tell me why not to?
:It was vandalism on someone's part. His contribution history was littered with other acts of vandalism too. I fixed it... although I wasn't logged in at the time. But it was me. -GamblinMonkey (talk) 12:55, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Mistake?

message: Okay, this is pretty much just like the old character analysis section from before. I'm removing these for the same reason people from before deleted the character analysis section. If you want to find out why, check out Taki's and Kilik's talk pages. If people want a strategy guide, they should go to fansites. Mythmonster2 (talk) 06:33, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Gameplay

message: I believe Yun-seong was created as a replacement for Hwang (why Hwang was not in SCII and was only a bonus character in SCIII). Yun-seong's moves were somewhat a modified version of Hwang's.
I think this description could be added to the article however, I could not present any reference or source. Well, just my perception.--JCD (Talk) 10:56, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Being a "replacement" character
Talk:Tall Ships Races

message: The race is no longer sponsored by or named after Cutty Sark. I've just participated and I don't remember the new sponsor's name, thus I think the new official name is just the Tall Ships' Race. The article ought to be renamed appropriately. PeteVerdon 09:16, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Sponsorship

message: You should know about this and comment.  One of our editors has systematically depopulated it (from this article perhaps, and among many others), and thinks that is a good reason to delete it. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 14:00, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Contested deletion [[Category talk:Yachting races]]

message: The winning ship was the Moyana. However, on their return journey to the UK the ketch was caught in a storm off the Cornwall coast and sank. Mercifully all the crew were saved. 2A00:23C4:E65C:A201:6407:D7B2:D0FD:1E0F (talk) 08:24, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Winner of first race 1956
Category talk:Battles by country involved

message: *See previous discussion here
*See WP:MILHIST#CATNAME as listed in Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Outreach/Newsletter January 2007 — MrDolomite | Talk 21:45, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Naming convention

message: I have been wikignoming thru the subcats cleaning up the alpha sort to remove "Battle of" or "Siege of"
*Completed:
** thru 
*except the following:
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
 — MrDolomite | Talk 22:38, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  cat alpha sort 

message: Any reason some countries are not listed?
One area I noticed was:
Slovakia
Czechoslokia
Bohemia-Morevia
Mkpumphrey 18:53, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slovakia Missing 

message: At present, people have put a number of early battles in the category "Battles involving Scotland" which clearly pre-date the creation of a unitary Scottish kingdom, the category guideline says they should not be included.  The trouble is, what do we do with them?  I created a category "Battles involving the Picts", then "Battles involving Dál Riata".  However, is this overdoing it?  We potentially have  yet another category "Battles involving the Kingdom of Strathclyde".   Are we in danger of "Battles by country" ending up including a very large number of sub-categories, some of them referring to obscure peoples or kingdoms and only containing a handful of battles.  Would it be better to lump them together in one category "Battles involving the peoples of early Scotland"?  Should we sub-categorise this by e.g. Picts, Dál Riata, Strathclyde?  Even then we have a grey area since Strathclyde was incorporated into Scotland slightly later than the unification of the Picts and Scots. PatGallacher 09:21, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scotland
Talk:Datasheet

message: Is it datasheet or data sheet.  Want to spell correctly on our web site. 2600:1700:B220:27F0:3157:39C5:6E1E:D6D1 (talk) 13:35, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I think both are right, but "datasheet" seems to be more popular, also it makes sense to concat similar to "databook", per https://archive.org/details/texts?query=databook  • Sbmeirow • Talk • 00:59, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelled as 1 word or 2
Talk:Women Writers Project

message: In my revision of this article, I included the following sentences, which were copied nearly verbatim from the previous version of the article:
:The eventual goal of the project is to make available all English language works written or co-authored by women up to 1850. At present the focus is on works that are otherwise difficult to obtain.
I could not find documention for the specifics of these sentences on the WWP website (or elsewhere), but they seem to me to be both very reasonable and very much in the spirit of the project, so I left them in. — Nowhither 10:17, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possibly unsupported statements 

message: I edited this for a course in Digital Writing with instruction and guidance from WikiEdu modules. I added peer-reviewed sources from journal articles and books to strengthen the claims in the page. I removed "Northeastern University" and "Brown University" from the title of the project in the lead and body sections of the page since it is mentioned thoroughly in the article where the project originated, moved to, and resides. I added a "Digital Tools" section that I hope will be expanded so that scholars, educators, and researchers in digital humanities can see some of the technologies the project uses. This seems appropriate to explain in conjunction with listing additional resources and outreach by the project in the following section titled "Resources and outreach." 
A lot of the article was plagiarized when I started working on it in mid-October, so I revised the wording to avoid plagiarism and added citations where necessary. Some citations are still needed for claims made in the article, and I hope to expand on this in the next few  weeks. 
Eastyorkzoo129 (talk) 14:19, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding sources outside WWP and WWO institution sites 

message: — Assignment last updated by Cja2023 (talk) 14:13, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Digital Writing
Talk:Rick Fox

message: Where is the source of the fact that Rick was born in the Bahamas? According to two other (basketball) sites, he's said to be born in Canada, but have moved to Bahamas.--ric_man 10:23, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for your suggestion regarding :Rick Fox! When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make whatever changes you feel are needed.  Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit any article by simply following the  link at the top. You don't even need to log in! (Although there are some reasons why you might like to...) The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills.  New contributors are always welcome. User:Zoe|(talk) 18:03, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

text: It was vandalism, and has been cleaned up.  User:Zoe|(talk) 18:03, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't Fox featured in some Radio Shack advertisements on television?  --Eastlaw 01:19, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertising & Endorsements 

message: It lists his weight in pounds as 230. But lists his weight in kg as 100, which is 220 lbs. Which one is correct and why is it wrong?--68.171.233.160 (talk) 15:36, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  weight conversion in infobox is not correct
Talk:Constitution of Singapore

message: What appears imho as a trivial typo error by an anonymous edit: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Constitution_of_Singapore&diff=next&oldid=623760351
C:\Users\admin>tracert 103.233.86.233
Tracing route to 103.233.86.233 over a maximum of 30 hops
  1   513 ms    53 ms   333 ms  router.asus.com [192.168.1.1]
  2   234 ms   356 ms    63 ms  1.192.75.138.unknown.m1.com.sg [138.75.192.1]
  3   243 ms   435 ms    52 ms  242.246.65.202.unknown.m1.com.sg [202.65.246.242]
  4   116 ms   118 ms   104 ms  241.246.65.202.unknown.m1.com.sg [202.65.246.241]
  5   105 ms   126 ms   127 ms  162.246.65.202.unknown.m1.com.sg [202.65.246.162]
  6   132 ms   147 ms   130 ms  ix-2-1-2-602.tcore1.SVW-Singapore.as6453.net [180.87.12.145]
  7   612 ms   505 ms   111 ms  if-11-2.thar1.SVQ-Singapore.as6453.net [180.87.98.37]
  8   116 ms   135 ms     7 ms  180.87.98.18  9   265 ms   504 ms   182 ms  ge-5-1-0.0.ejr03.sin001.flagtel.com [62.216.137.150]
 10   460 ms  1753 ms   269 ms  so-6-1-0.0.ejr01.chn001.flagtel.com [62.216.128.74]
 11  1292 ms   409 ms   195 ms  62.216.144.78
 12     *        *        *     Request timed out.
 13   200 ms   860 ms   183 ms  220.225.250.125
 14     *        *        *     Request timed out.
 15   627 ms   279 ms    98 ms  103.233.86.233
 16     *        *        *     Request timed out.
 17     *        *        *     Request timed out.
 18     *        *        *     Request timed out.
 19     *        *        *     Request timed out.
 20     *        *        *     Request timed out.
 21     *        *        *     Request timed out.
 22     *        *        *     Request timed out.
 23     *        *
Change is being left as it is, next editing user may correct it where feasible and appropriate imho.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.75.199.156 (talk) 03:25, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change on 13 March 2015 by anonymous user 103.233.86.233
Talk:Peter Pan (1953 film)

message: In the second paragraph of the plot, Mr Smee is listed as both captain and first mate. It should be changed from:
"A ship of pirates is anchored off Neverland, led by Mr. Smee and his first mate, Mr. Smee."
To:
"A ship of pirates is anchored off Neverland, led by Captain Hook and his first mate, Mr. Smee." Agreeablespare (talk) 15:02, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Thanks for pointing this out. Stelmaris (talk) 15:26, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 25 April 2023 

message: Peter Pan song meme includes the misheard lyrics "Think of Batman pooping snakes."https://wgntv.com/morning-news/think-of-batman-pooping-snakes-the-most-misunderstood-song-lyrics-of-all-time/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.72.175.175 (talk) 23:41, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Misheard song lyrics

message: — Assignment last updated by Jonathany1pp (talk) 23:10, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Gender, Race and Computing

message: 69.42.5.192 (talk) 02:52, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Reworded. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 04:07, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 25 October 2023 

message: The crocodile has a name which is Tick-Tock, should we refer to the crocodile as this during his parts of the plot? 2601:646:9E01:77F5:8569:8C2E:E72B:AB22 (talk) 04:12, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request on all parts of the crocodile
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Log/2005 August 13

message: If anyone's waiting for me to post the image I removed from the VfD queue to WP:IFD, it turned out to be an image that had been moved to commons (hence no reason to delete). I added  to the image page. I am also going to list  for speedy deletion. I've never come across such a case but I believe it fits the spirit of speedy criteria. Any insights welcome. Rl 10:29, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Guruvayur

message: Tux the penguin 10:30, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Some Edits and liks added

message: According to the guidelines given by WikiProject Hinduism, shouldn't the title of the page be Guruvayur, and not Guruvayoor? An example given in the WikiProject page is Bhumi, not Bhoomi. Similarly, Guruvayoorappan should be transliterated as Guruvayurappan, according to me. Adityan 01:09, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Transliteration of Guruvayur

message: The location of Guruvayur on the map is clearly wrong (on the map, it's in the sea) - can somebody who knows how fix this up? Damanmundine1 08:36, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Map Showing Guruvayur
Talk:Salomé (1922 film)

message: It's going to be difficult to do a good search online for a source for "Salomé is often called one of the first art films to be made in the U.S." precisely because the much-reproduced ad copy for a reissue of the film makes the claim, and hence the phrase "Hailed as America's first art film" is associated with it all over the Web. I think the claim is legitimate, but I'm not sure how to cite well for it. - Jmabel | Talk 04:17, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Art film"

message: Why do some sites list this as a 1922 film? --HunterZ (talk) 00:00, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: It appears to have premiered New Year's Eve 1922, with an initial wide release in February of 1923. I can't find good sources for either of those but it's what IMDb says. If anyone can find a good source for the premiere date I believe this article should be changed to say 1922. Radeklew (talk) 19:58, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release year? 
Talk:List of places in Glasgow

message: Wouldn't this article be nicer if it simply included districts within Glasgow, and not random towns within a 20 mile radius of Glasgow's borders? Note the table on the page here for Halfway - a town which itself is probably not in Glasgow's borders any more for that matter. 13/08/2005
Actually I think you are confusing two places named Halfway, one is on Paisley Road West at Mosspark Boulevard, the other is out past Cambuslang. I created the original "Areas of Glasgow" list, but the fact that it now contains places as far away as Bristol means that it's just not worth the hassle any more.
:OK I will have to have a wee look next time I'm at the cat and dog home. If people again start adding Airdrie, Cowdenbeath, Orkney etc. I suggest at the very least we start a separate section for these places (on the same page) instead of the asterisk thing which just looked horrible. 14/08/05
I decided to change it to how it should be, and how it originally was. This has been annoying me for a while, as it is very inaccurate. I hope this is not construed as vandalism, even if it is deleted, because it is not intended to be.   The towns links to Glasgow were becoming increasingly obscure - eventually we would be adding Kilmarnock and Stirling. 13/08/05
Egypt is a lesser known area of Glasgow, it is in the east end of the city along London Road. Fraslet 16:04, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Towns not in Glasgow

message: North of the River Clyde
Only this article has 
Barrachnie, Blochairn, Braidfauld, Camlachie, Drumry, Linthouse, Outer Kelvinside, Provanhall, Scotstounhill, Springhill, Yoker, Yorkhill
Only Areas of Glasgow template has 
Auchinloch | Blythswood Hill | Finnieston | High Ruchill | Kelvinbridge | Merchant City | Woodside, Glasgow|Woodside | Wyndford |
South of the River Clyde
Only this article has 
Auldhouse, Cessnock
Only Areas of Glasgow template has 
Corkerhill | Eastfield, Glasgow|Eastfield | Eastwood, East Renfrewshire | Fernhill | Linthouse | Penilee |
Not sure that Eastwood should be there as it is in East Renfrewshire.
I argue that the lists in this article should be removed and replaced with the Areas of Glasgow template to save having to update two lots.
Thanks. Samantha of Cardyke 15:12, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Difference between area lists in this article and Areas of Glasgow template

message: Would a map with the areas on it be in any way worthwhile?
Does anyone even have semi-defined boundaries for these areas?
For example just off Finnieston Street the area is variously referred to as Finnieston, Cranston Hill, Anderston and the local big-brand supermarket labels itself Yorkhill branch...Of those Anderston seems strongest as a "real place" but it doesn't seem to stretch as far west as the Police Station on Argyle Street (Cranston Hill).
Too Long; Didn't Read:  Before I'd feel comfortable editing things to do with Finnieston as I see it I'd need some sort of guidance as to what forms its boundaries.
188.223.110.93 (talk) 01:16, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Would a map aid clarity?
Talk:KPCC (FM)

message: Watts and meters should be written "W" and "m"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.59.27.168 (talk) 09:21, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Watts and meters 

message: What happened to history section of this article?? The one the went over how the station went from being mostly music to "intelligent talk" when Minnesota Public Radio came in and the controversy that caused? Oh, wait - yet another victim of edit wars and overzealous editors. Prime example of why good editors gave up and why donations are not pouring in this time. 76.95.33.253 (talk) 03:44, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: All Wikipedia material needs to be verifiable. The "History" section does not now have a single citation, and it's not clear where we're getting this information from. Are you aware of any relaible sources for this material?   Will Beback  talk   03:59, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: History
Talk:KBIG

message: I don't think it is important to note in the article herein, but early ownership was Bonneville International (owned by the LDS church). --  FYI, AstroU (talk) 19:39, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  History of ownership 
Talk:KLOS

message: I think the order of the logos may be reversed for the 1970s and 1980s. My memory might be foggy, but I'm pretty sure they referred to themselves as "95½" through most of the '70s, and they changed to using "95.5" some time in the '80s. Many stations in the '70s omitted the decimal fraction, rounding up or down (i.e. "Magic 106", "K-Earth 101", "K-100"), but since KLOS was halfway between 95 and 96, they had always said "ninety-five-and-a-half". DHowell 06:29, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  1970s & 1980s Logos 

message: Any reason why the Impact program, a show that's been hosted by Frank Sontag for over 20 years, isn't listed anywhere on the page? Time slot is 12:00 AM to 5:00 AM Monday mornings. Roguegeek (talk) 16:16, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Impact
Talk:KOST

message: This article is one big advertisment for the station. Look at it where it says suchandsuch deejays "help make the weekends more enjoyable." That's encyclopedic language? Wiki strikes again.
And look at the ad the jingle company managed to sneak in at the end.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.163.0.44 (talk) 16:32, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Has this problem been solved? It's been almost ten years since the above comment. Jeh (talk) 03:38, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: ad