lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Katharina Sieverding

message: Much of this article seems to be taken word-for-word (including typos) from the press release for Sieverding's retrospective at the Museum of Modern Art, New York. The same press release is listed as two of the three citations. Shouldn't the page be re-written with more extensive citations (to verify whatever MoMA's website claims) and in original, uncopied text?SNDLLN (talk) 07:10, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Plagiarism

message: The year of birth 1944 isnt correct: Her birth year has generally been considered to be 1944, but by her own admission, Sieverding, who lives in Düsseldorf, will already be 80 this year, according to which she was born in 1941. "No, my public birth data is not correct," she said. "I am now already in my 80th year." Citation from the Süddeutsche Zeitung. Zartesbitter (talk) 10:21, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  birth year
Talk:Eibingen Abbey

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Abtei St. Hildegard, Rüdesheim, Nave and Sanctuary b 20140922 1.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on November 18, 2016. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2016-11-18. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 07:58, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Abtei St. Hildegard, Rüdesheim, Nave and Sanctuary b 20140922 1.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon
Talk:Boomerang around the world

message: Is this article really necessary? It seems like it has all the info the main article already does. I can't see any differences.--Kaonashi 23:00, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Nick Hancock

message: """Hancock's biggest break was when he replaced Mike Myers, who had gone to work in Canada."""
replaced in/as what?   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.104.90.65 (talk) 13:52, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replaced in what? 

message: He was in an ep of Absolutely (S2E1, aired in 1990) which was around the start of his career on the list of TV shows on IMDB (which BTW doesn't mention Absolutely)...I'm not sure if this was mentioned on "Before they were famous" or not, I've not seen it, but I notice he has a mention there.  In the sketch he plays one of the "vague peoples of britain" and is standing just behind Jack Docherty.  99.9% sure it is him, if not it's someone who looks remarkably like him...as usual, no mention of extras in the credits :-)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.194.44.145 (talk) 20:46, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Absolutely 

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Support. This should have never been moved in the first place. There is only one Nick Hancock on wikipedia. No need for a dab page at all. Station1 (talk) 23:21, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Dickinson System

message: The NCAA records book marks both 1924 and 1925 as retroactive selections. I believe this is a misunderstanding... the Rissman trophy was awarded retroactively for those two years after being created for 1926. But the 1925 selection has been shown to be contemporary, and 1924 may have been as well.
Dickinson seemingly wrote a column in Big Ten Weekly where he made the selections.
In the citation used to show that the 1925 Dartmouth selection was contemporary, Dickinson writes:
:No team will ever monopolize the national championship. Readers of the Big Ten Weekly may recall that the 1924 champion was Notre Dame, with California second and Yale, third. Their names are absent this year, except for Notre Dame's honorable mention.
This January 1926 story also mention's Dickinson's Big Ten Weekly column as the source of the Dartmouth selection.
:In an article in the current issue of the Big Ten Weekly, he ranks the teams as follows: 1. Dartmouth.
I can't find any newspaper citations for a contemporary selection of Notre Dame for 1924. But it seemingly exists in an issue of this hard-to-find magazine. Not sure how to track down the article.
PK-WIKI (talk) 10:54, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  1924 retroactive?
Talk:Dunhuang

message: Someone needs to include the fact that HUGE amounts of Buddhist and other ancient Chinese texts were found here in the 1970's and lead to numerous advances many Asian studies and history fields. 
68.91.252.168 23:16, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: *http://maps.google.com/maps?q=40.452107,93.742118&hl=en&ll=40.447339,93.743763&spn=0.099674,0.154324&sll=40.489066,93.500661&sspn=0.001556,0.002411&vpsrc=6&t=h&z=13
--Terraflorin (talk) 11:19, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's that? 

message: Just as a reminder, if we've got the Chinese script in the infobox and the Chinese infobox, we don't repeat it a third time in the lead sentence. — LlywelynII 04:12, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: MOS-ZH

message: At the paintings of Zeng Hao Dunhuang (zdhdart.com) appears also the Dunhuang flying deity (just copy and translate the title of the artwork); but there is nowhere information to be found on the english speaking internet. Could someone with the knowledge of chinese bring light into this subject and perhaps make a disambiguation page for this name (Dunhuang)?
: If he is prominent enough then article will be created for him. If he is a local artist of no international repute, he would not be notable enough for an article.  To my eyes his paintings look kitsch. In any case his name is Zeng Hao, there is no need for disambiguation for any page about him or his paintings even if he becomes notable. Hzh (talk) 09:44, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dunhuang flying deity 
Talk:Cunningham chain

message: For every integer n 
 n x (#p) - 1 mod 6 = 5
and such a number is not divisible by any prime smaller or equal p and therefore quite likely prime. So it is easy to find Sophie Germain primes by
testing such numbers. 
109.90.224.162 (talk) 19:12, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  How it works 

message: Consider these propositions:
:A: there exists a first-kind Cunningham chain of infinite length
:B: for every integer n, there exists a first-kind Cunningham chain of at least n elements
:C: there exist infinitely many Sophie Germain primes
A implies B, and B implies C.  Since the veracity of C is currently unknown, it cannot be known that either A or B is true.  Disproving C would disprove A and B, but proving C wouldn't prove anything about A and B.
But still, it would be interesting to know whether either A or B has been disproven by some other means.
To look at it differently, there are four possibilities:
:(a) the number of Sophie Germain primes is finite
:(b) there are infinitely many Sophie Germain primes, but Cunningham sequences have a maximum length (the set of possible Cunningham sequence lengths is a finite ordinal)
:(c) there exist arbitrary long Cunningham sequences, but no infinitely long ones (the set of possible Cunningham sequence lengths is ω)
:(d) there exists an infinite Cunningham sequence (the set of possible Cunningham sequence lengths is ω + 1)
So (a) is an open possibility.  But is each of the others still an open possibility, or has any of them been disproven? — Smjg (talk) 00:15, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added a short proof (based on cited ref) that A above is false. Hpablo (talk) 17:35, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possibility of unbounded length? 

message: This has zero google hits. Does not seem to be an established thing or at least name. -Koppapa (talk) 09:51, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anti cunningham chain
Talk:List of comics about the September 11 attacks

message: Is there a significant purpose (like: this article should only cover comics from the time right after the attack), why "In the Shadow of No Towers" by Art Spiegelman is missing?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.248.58.255 (talk) 07:36, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Some time ago, I started compiling Listmania list on Amazon.com of post-9/11 comics of all varieties. Those doing the wiki list here might want to add these:  http://amzn.com/lm/R3N2JT0N8Z4XG2. Troutfang (talk) 03:46, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comics to add to the list
Talk:Head hair

message: So I started working on this and found two appropirate categories (Category:Hair and Category:Anatomy-stub when I realized that there's already a much fuller (no pun intended) piece on the subject at Hair#Head hair. As far as I can tell, normally what happens is that we wait until the section becomes too long, then move it to the main article and write a short summary with a "Main Article:____" tag. In this case, the main article does exist but is basically a one-sentence stub. Sooo... what do we do? Personally, I'd call for changing the whole thing to a redirect in the meantime; even though NewGuy4 did a pretty decent opener, it wouldn't be a loss of that much work — but do correct me if I'm wrong, I mean absolutely no offense (I sure can't claim to have started an article longer than two sentences).
Oh, I should also mention that I went ahead with the "Main article" tag, with a mention of this one still being a stub, if only to attract a little more attention to the issue (for people already curious about head hair). Was that wrong? --Lenoxus 23:18, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Question
Talk:Claros

message: Isn't "Claros" the same place as "Clarus" which has its own article? Shouldn't the material in both articles be combined?
66.28.241.34 (talk) 19:22, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Combine this article with Clarus? 

message: After reading the article for Clarus and consulting the sources for merging that article with this article, I noticed there were some notable factual mistakes:
*The Epigoni did not flee after sacking Thebes, but the Thebans were captured and sent to Delphi by the the Epigoni after they conquered Thebes.
*Calchas was not a Trojan, was not a refugee and did not succeed Mopsus. 
*According to this article (i.e. Claros) Alexander the Great consulted the oracle at Claros. But according to Pausanias it was the Smyrnaeans who did so, Alexander only decided to refound Smyrna and the Smyrnaeans asked the oracle if they should move to the new Smyrna.
I've corrected all of this now. But there still remain some more improvements to be done. Right now, the section on the excavations contains much information about the history of the site itself. That content should be moved to the appropriate subsections of the History section instead. The Excavations section should concern itself with describing the excavations if you ask me. And of course, as I've indicated with Template:Citation needed, we need a lot more sources to back up all the claims. Given the factual errors I've already discovered here, I take all the claims lacking a reference with a big grain of salt. --AlexanderVanLoon (talk) 14:34, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Factual errors corrected, suggestions for further improvement
Talk:Jihan El-Tahri

message: she is in both IMDb and facebook
John5Russell3Finley (talk) 17:23, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Facebook and IMDB do not meet Wikipedia's criteria for reliable sources. You can find additional information at WP:RS. --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 17:34, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  internet refs
Talk:Strong pseudoprime

message: "A strong pseudoprime to base a is always an Euler pseudoprime to base a (Pomerance, Selfridge, Wagstaff 1980), but not all Euler pseudoprimes are strong pseudoprimes. Some Fermat pseudoprimes and Carmichael numbers are also strong pseudoprimes."
"A  strong pseudoprime to base a is always an Euler pseudoprime to base a" includes that every strong pseudoprime is a fermat pseudoprime. So "Some Fermat pseudoprimes and Carmichael numbers are also strong pseudoprimes" is redundant and should be: "Some Carmichael numbers are also strong pseudoprimes". --Arbol01 23:40, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redundant? 

message: I found that 91 is a strong pseudoprime to base 12, but it is not an Euler-Jacobi pseudoprime to base 12, I doubt that the article is not true.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.12.251.120 (talk) 09:36, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, they are.  For a=12, n=91: \scriptstyle a^{(n-1)/2} \equiv \left(\frac{a}{n}\right)\pmod{n} hence it is a Euler-Jacobi pseudoprime.  See the Pomerance-Selfridge-Wagstaff paper, page 1009.  It's also noted in Grantham 2001, Riesel, and elsewhere.  Note that most sources say Euler pseudoprime for what this Wikipedia is distinguishing as a Euler-Jacobi pseudoprime.  DAJ NT (talk) 21:05, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are strong pseudoprimes always Euler-Jacobi pseudoprimes? 

message: Some ways to create this list.
Perl:
 use ntheory ":all"; my @ps; for my $b (2..100) { for my $n (1..1e7) { if (!is_prime($n) && ($b % $n) && is_strong_pseudoprime($n,$b)) { push @ps,$n; last } } } print join(", ",@ps), "\n";
Pari/GP:
 is(n, b=3)={ bittest(n, 0)||return; ispseudoprime(n)&return; my(d=(n-1)>>valuation(n-1, 2)); Mod(b, n)^d==1 || until(n-1<=d*=2, Mod(b, n)^d+1 || return(1))};
for(base=2,100,forcomposite(n=2,10^7,if(is(n,base),print1(n", ");break)))
I don't understand why we particularly care about this list, but there we are.  DAJ NT (talk) 20:37, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like 24.240.67.157 reverted back to the giant table.  Can we remove this or compress it?  I don't see that the table adds any value to the subject.  The author has added similar tables to other pages such as Fermat pseudoprime, Euler pseudoprime, and Euler-Jacobi pseudoprime.  These tables seem like examples of the WP:Datahoard subject.  DAJ NT (talk) 08:35, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

text: Removed the huge tables, copied from OEIS, by 101.15.81.148.  There is no reason for this data to be on the page. DAJ NT (talk) 18:02, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Least witness to bases 2..n
Talk:Assemblage (art)

message: I am an assemblage artist and gallery owner and intend to edit this article in good faith and a neutral point of view.
:  Bfpage |leave a message  11:51, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: COI disclosure

message: Per WP:NFCC#1, a nonfree image may not be used when a free image serving the same purpose is available. Here, It is obviously not necessary to use a nonfree image to provide an example of an assemblage, since a free image of an example is already in the article, there is no claim it is not suitable, or that the nonfree image is not replaceable. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo).  Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006.   (talk) 11:34, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: NFCC issues

message: Drop the stick - WP:STICK clearly the Rauschenberg should stay in the lede of this article. It remained as the lede for 10 years, and it is a Major defining work of the subject. This is ridiculous...Modernist (talk) 11:55, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Since you make no attempt to explain why the image is not replaceable, and alternative free images are available, it's clear you believe your own aesthetic preferences override NFCC policy. That's a dead end. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo).  Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006.   (talk) 12:02, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Vendetta
Talk:Firbolg (Dungeons & Dragons)

message: Put all unformatted & incomplete references here:--Robbstrd 23:49, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Incomplete References

message: I ask out of genuine curiosity...  Where, exactly, are the weasel words in this article?  --Craw-daddy | T | 00:54, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: We're not expecting all of Gavin's templates to make sense, or that he explain them, are we? BOZ (talk) 02:09, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I thought that I'd ask.  --Craw-daddy | T | 09:37, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I will annotate where weasel words have been used so there is no doubt. --Gavin Collins (talk) 15:13, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Why not be bold and just remove the weasel words yourself? Actually editing and improving articles can be rewarding; you should try it. :) Rray (talk) 15:53, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I re-read this article, and I don't think the weasel words template even remotely applies here, so I removed it. I'll admit I could be wrong, and if Gavin is willing to provide specific examples of weasel words on the talk page, I'll re-add the template myself. Rray (talk) 16:17, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Weasel words??

message: Redirect this to Creature type (Dungeons & Dragons)#Giant ??  --Craw-daddy | T | 12:54, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect

message: Having recently started a List of Dungeons & Dragons monsters, I am trying to determine which monster articles should be redirected into the lists.  I believe this article may be a suitable candidate to be merged and redirected into List of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons 1st edition monsters, as that is when it first debuted in the Dungeons & Dragons game.  Please discuss reasons for or against such a merge.  If no discussion has taken place 5 days from now, I will redirect this article to that list; otherwise I will follow whatever discussion takes place here.  Thank you!  :) BOZ (talk) 03:38, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Benjamín Noval

message: If it's okay to state in prose that he's going to ride with another team next year, why is it wrong to put that same exact information in the infobox? Nosleep (Talk · Contribs) 06:26, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It doesn't say "he's going to ride with another team next year", it says "for the 2011 season (he) has joined (other people) in signing for .  This is what we agreed last year: signing of contracts is an historic fact, and merits mention in the text whereas actually joining a team (which is what the infobox indicates), for as long as it is a future expectation, includes a measure of expectation.  Tom Zirbel did sign for Garmin, but he didn't ride for them. I would imagine that description of moves in terms of contracts will usually serve as a placeholder until an update is appropriate: in a few months this article will probably say something like, "Noval switched to Astana for 2008, and for the 2011 season joined compatriots and team-mates Alberto Contador, Jesús Hernández and Daniel Navarro in moving to Team Saxo Bank-SunGard." Kevin McE (talk) 10:51, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe I'm being stupid, but I just don't see the distinction. I'll just steer clear of editing bios for the next few months. Best solution for all involved. Nosleep (Talk · Contribs) 22:49, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  I honestly am confused
Talk:Voadkyn

message: Please post incomplete & unformatted references here:--Robbstrd 23:53, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Incomplete references

message: Having recently started a List of Dungeons & Dragons monsters, I am trying to determine which monster articles should be redirected into the lists.  I believe this article may be a suitable candidate to be merged and redirected into List of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons 1st edition monsters, as that is when it first debuted in the Dungeons & Dragons game.  Please discuss reasons for or against such a merge.  If no discussion has taken place 5 days from now, I will redirect this article to that list; otherwise I will follow whatever discussion takes place here.  Thank you!  :) BOZ (talk) 04:03, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: As there were no responses, I redirected this article to the list page.  Since no response is also no consensus, any editor may restore this article at any time. However, rather than simply reverting, I urge you to use this space to develop some form of consensus regarding the article, lest another editor put this article up for deletion. BOZ (talk) 18:52, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirected
Talk:List of MPs elected in the 1950 United Kingdom general election

message: Five Members of Parliament elected in 1950 are still alive at the moment:
*Robert Carr (b. 1916)
*Bill Deedes (b. 1913)
*Michael Foot (b. 1913)
*John Freeman (b. 1915)
*David Renton (b. 1908)
To these five could be added Tony Benn (b. 1925) who was elected at a November 1950 byelection and so sat in the same Parliament. Sam Blacketer 23:54, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survivors

message: The National Liberals were in alliance with the Conservatives, bringing total Conservative strength to 262 seats.
Err...weren't the UUP and the Scottish Unionists also in alliance with the Conservatives, bringing total Conservative strength to 298? john k (talk) 11:58, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alliance with conservatives 
Talk:Abydos King List

message: How is this a stub? --Onceonthisisland 23:10, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Start -98.206.36.241 (talk) 18:21, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

text: It doesn't have ANY  information about who found the list when or who translated it.  That is all crucial to understanding who knew what when as far as later material using the info in the kings list.  If none of the references have this information, there must be sources that  do, such as the  original archaeological report.  The author hasn't done all the homework to make this a good article. 100.15.120.122 (talk) 13:15, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stub? 

message: Where is he?  Did he use another name?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.94.234.108 (talk) 19:09, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Either you have a typo here  or the source you got this name from is a bad source.  Check your data and try again.  100.15.120.122 (talk) 13:17, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Akhenanen. - 8th dynasty
Talk:Minotaur (Dungeons & Dragons)

message: Hello! I have removed the recent deletion proposal, because secondary sources exist. All three existing independent secondary sources do directly refer to the minotaur. They only do so about the creative origin. Apart from that, there is at least more extensive treatment in The Monsters Know What They're Doing, pages 197-199. The minotaur also appears in third party pulications. If that together is not judged notable enough to keep by a neutral arbitrator, the page should be merged and redirected to Monsters in Dungeons & Dragons or List of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons 2nd edition monsters rather than deleted outright. Daranios (talk) 20:48, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: AFD is likely to follow, so this can be brought up at that time as well. BOZ (talk) 22:01, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Why the deletion proposal was removed