Talk:KTUL

message: Is that list of former personalites serious? come on people.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Cup2avs9601 (talk • contribs) 
::Hmmmm.....seems like we have a disgruntled former employee on our hands. So sad. I'm considering not even bothering to post warning templates on the talk page of the vandal with the wandering IP number who appears to be obsessed with this article. I think in future I'll simply gain my satisfaction by watching those dull old nuggets get reverted fairly quickly by someone, if I'm lucky I'll get to do it myself, this silly game apparently will never end, oh well. Have fun. Deconstructhis (talk) 19:35, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hello, Please do not add unreferenced names as entries to the list of former employees in articles. Including this type of material in articles does not abide by current consensus and its inclusion is strongly discouraged in our policies and guidelines. The rationales are as follows:
#WP:NOT tells us, Wikipedia is "not an indiscriminate collection of information."  As that section describes, just because something is true, doesn't necessarily mean the info belongs in Wikipedia.  
#As per WP:V, we cannot include information in Wikipedia that is not verifiable and sourced. 
# WP:NLIST tells us that lists included within articles (including people's names) are subject to the same need for references as any other information in the article. 
#Per WP:BLP, we have to be especially careful about including un-sourced info about living persons.
If you look at articles about companies in general, you will not find mention of previous employees, except in those cases where the employee was particularly notable.  Even then, the information is not presented just as a list of names, but is incorporated into the text itself (for example, when a company's article talks about the policies a previous CEO had, or when they mention the discovery/invention of a former engineer/researcher). If a preexisting article is already in the encyclopedia for the person you want to add to a list, it's generally regarded as sufficient to support their inclusion in list material in another article.  cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 05:07, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding unreferenced entries of former employees to lists containing BLP material 

message: According to a Youtube video (KTUL-TV Spanish-language commercials, search for it on Youtube), KTUL-TV was most likely a part time Univision affiliate around 1989 and 1990 based on what I found, but I can't say for sure this is verifiable enough. The video's commercials tend to come from Miami, Florida and this tells me it was a satellite feed from their Univision affiliate. The article does not say KTUL-TV has an Univision subchannel right now either and Univision in Tulsa is on KUTU-CD 25. 2605:E000:FDCA:4200:613F:2DF8:D15B:5AA2 (talk) 22:48, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  KTUL TV had Univision in 1989-90? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on KTUL. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130829004251/http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1082A2.pdf to http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1082A2.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120619074838/http://www.ktul.com/story/18772413/don-woods-has-lost-his-battle-with-cancer to http://www.ktul.com/story/18772413/don-woods-has-lost-his-battle-with-cancer
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:15, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I need to remove a show on Programming that is no longer on the station, please. UnionOK (talk) 16:01, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:27, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 10 November 2021 

message: :"most television sets on the retail market then were not equipped with UHF tuners (this situation would not change until after the FCC passed the All-Channel Receiver Act into law in 1961)."
The FCC does not pass legislation. Congresscritters pass legislation.
Furthermore, the law may have been passed in 1961, but the requirement that new TV's actually have the tuners only took effect starting with the 1964 models. 66.102.87.40 (talk) 19:49, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Bsoyka (talk · contribs) 16:11, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 20 February 2022