lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Stamp Duty Ordinance

message: Well, where is the citation for the claims of "most" used sections of the ordinance ? Matthew hk (talk) 19:17, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: changed the wording to "notable". Matthew hk (talk) 19:29, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:OR]]
Talk:Aviation machinist's mate

message: According to this AMM and AMMC were formerly used to designate this profession. Danceswithzerglings (talk) 12:21, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have also redirected ACMM here. Someone should expand on these. Drutt (talk) 12:08, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Obsolete designations
Talk:Aviation electrician's mate

message: Should the Navy slang term, 'onewire' be included?
LorenzoB 20:29, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Intermediate sanctions

message: "Intermediate sanctions" can also refer to other penalties imposed by courts in the US alone . This page should probably be moved to Intermediate sanctions (IRS). Have mörser, will travel (talk) 01:52, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dab needed 
Talk:Aerographer's mate

message: According to this, AerM was formerly used to designate this profession. Danceswithzerglings (talk) 12:23, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Obsolete designation

message: Removed classifiacation needed for job. I felt it unnecessary for this page. ebaben3 (talk) 04:45, 04 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Clearance required
Talk:Aviation ordnanceman

message: Should the Navy slang term, 'BB stacker' be included?
LorenzoB 20:31, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: BB Stacker

message: According to this, AOM was formerly used to designate this profession. Danceswithzerglings (talk) 12:26, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Obsolete designation

message: it mentions "three different types of ordnanceman; "O" (organizational) level, "I" (intermediate) level, and "D" (depot) level." 
Aboard a US navy Aircraft carrier -there is the ships crew, and then there is the Air Wing. So are AO ever assigned to ships crew of Aircarft carrier- or just memeber of the Air Wing? Will some AO work predominately below deck in the magazines where the weapons are stored?  As this mentions the 3 different types - Will an AO ever remain the same type his whole carerr- or change basae on duty at each phs/ location of his career. 
Wfoj3 (talk) 12:03, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need more detail.
Talk:Ted Tally

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- KenWalker | Talk 07:43, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: Any sources for the kids' ages? They are 24 years apart and Tally had the son when he was 16?--134.130.4.242 (talk) 21:14, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the names and birthdates for the children. Not only is it unsourced, but it violates WP:BLPNAME. Jezebel'sPonyoshhh 20:43, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age of children 

message: The article had a category Writers from Pennsylvania, but nothing in the article says anything about Pennsylvania.  I removed the category and the template for PA. Put them back when material on the Pennsylvania connection is added, with sources, to the article.--DThomsen8 (talk) 16:50, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pennsylvania? 
Talk:Naval aircrewman

message: Page needs a new title and needs to be updated and rewritten to include the consolidation of the other rates into the Naval Aircrewman (AW) rating.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 163.251.184.3 (talk) 18:54, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re write 

message: How can I get a picture of the group that graduated With me? OjkJr (talk) 23:11, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:   I was part of class 11-71  NAOCS Pensacola 

message: This article is misleading. It implies only AWs can earn Aircrew wings. This is far from true. PumpkinSky talk 03:20, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Misleading
Talk:Tie (cavity wall)

message: im still writing the page. I am currently learning about walls atm and i am writing as i learn. Give it 12 hours and if it is still short u may go ahead and delete
--Nitr021 09:21, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Some of the information here is not applicable to the UK, where we use only stainless steel ties (we have old properties with iron ties and they rust through, leaving walls unstable, and swell, breaking up masonry) and where untied cavity walls are considered unsafe and not permitted.
Tabby 15:05, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: US vs UK

message: See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cavity_wall  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.92.152.176 (talk) 05:32, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible Overlap with the Cavity Wall article?
Talk:Engineering aide

message: For a reason I have not yet fully understood, user Shem has de-capitalized this article, and cited WP:MILTERMS as his justification. However, his citation specifically cites the following exception: "Enlisted personnel in navies and coast guards capitalize each particular name of their rating. For example, Aviation Boatswain's Mate Chief John Smith." Therefore, my proposal is to have this article revert to its proper spelling of capitalizing every word in the rate. Please vote agree or disagree. Thanks! Highspeed (talk) 09:56, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll leave the same message here as I did at my talk page. - I'm afraid the misinterpretation is yours.  According to WP:MILTERMS, the general guidance is "Military ranks follow the same capitalization guidelines as given under titles of people above." The specific line you refer to signals that rank-and-name for navies and coast guards should be written as "Aviation Boatswain's Mate Chief John Smith", not "Aviation boatswain's mate Chief John Smith".  I'm not quite sure how it crept in there actually, since you wouldn't write "Regimental sergeant major John Smith" either, but there you go. Ranks per se (ie not as part of a name) are lower case, as is eloquently explained at WP:JOBTITLES.  And it's not a !vote - see WP:VOTE.  Shem (talk) 20:55, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Capitalization of Navy Ratings
Talk:Equipment operator

message: For a reason I have not yet fully understood, user Shem has de-capitalized this article, and cited WP:MILTERMS as his justification. However, his citation specifically cites the following exception: "Enlisted personnel in navies and coast guards capitalize each particular name of their rating. For example, Aviation Boatswain's Mate Chief John Smith." Therefore, my proposal is to have this article revert to its proper spelling of capitalizing every word in the rate. Please vote agree or disagree. Thanks! Highspeed (talk) 09:55, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll leave the same message here as I did at my talk page. - I'm afraid the misinterpretation is yours.  According to WP:MILTERMS, the general guidance is "Military ranks follow the same capitalization guidelines as given under titles of people above." The specific line you refer to signals that rank-and-name for navies and coast guards should be written as "Aviation Boatswain's Mate Chief John Smith", not "Aviation boatswain's mate Chief John Smith".  I'm not quite sure how it crept in there actually, since you wouldn't write "Regimental sergeant major John Smith" either, but there you go. Ranks per se (ie not as part of a name) are lower case, as is eloquently explained at WP:JOBTITLES.  And it's not a !vote - see WP:VOTE.  Shem (talk) 20:55, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Capitalization of Navy Ratings
Template talk:Latest stable software release/Google Earth

message: linux version should be listed as stable as well.205.132.170.97 09:20, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

message: according to , which looks like an official announcement, version 5.2 is released . i.e, stable.Melnakeeb (talk) 14:52, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks official. But if you install it got to help -> about Google Earth and it prompts you with Beta. Either it's official but they forgot to remove the not or it's still beta but they forgot to tell. --Denniss (talk) 15:36, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  v 5.2 beta or not
Talk:Culinary specialist (United States Navy)

message: No mention of mess cooks/FSAs?  These are non-MS/CS personnel temporarily assigned to duty in the galley to assist with cleaning, food prep, trash, &c -- similar to the Army's KP.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.255.171.122 (talk) 17:10, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  FSA
Talk:223rd Military Intelligence Battalion (United States)

message: It is not appropriate to name the individual soldiers in this unit.  Please remove references to persons by name. 
http://www.militarymuseum.org/223MIinsig.html
Iraq OEF/OIF 1 as noted here
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/report/2004/onpoint/cflcc.htm
Olympics in UT, linguistic support
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/agency/army/100tc.htm
Our Iraq Fatality: LT Michael Vega
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ops/iraq_casualties_mar04.htm
 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.238.202.231 (talk) 02:40, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mineman

message: The most decorated mineman should have a slot on this page: http://minemen.org/fact.htm
~~  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.101.30.231 (talk) 23:42, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Operations specialist (United States Navy)

message: USA Lands having colony tactics upon them from all directions -->WEST Nations,North Nations,East Nations,SOUTH Nations... USA businesses/Properties/Lands are all being bought out while Russians and Uk FACK WAR is a destruction but is also being Played Out to look real for means of Plundering USA Resources away Soo no war machine's of USA can be used that long,if at all...USA is having thousands of other races/cultures are invading freely do to Chinese Joe Biden agreeing to let them do so. There invading freely for 3 reasons,to have more numbers to corrupt the voting branch's and 2nd is So they can help inflation rise faster so to them being accepted for unemployment/SSI/Food stamps with no issues or proof of I'D needed/over looked.The 3rd reason is the MOST effective one and that is in order to force humans/Americans off USA grounds there gonna have to get 3x of USA population max Soo they Will out number USA over all. CHINESE ARE One's colonization USA through out Faith organizations,Banks and so on but cities and states as well has been Colonized from the brain washed Americans/bots for the greed money while brain washed by thinking Jesus is there higher power that  they worship and get orders to while being paid for it globally.... 24.217.28.157 (talk) 11:07, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  .....True Insight.....
Talk:Al Nipper

message: There is no evidence to suggest that this horrible replica jersey was ever game worn, and the post links to a spam fake jersey site. Kickysam49 (talk) 01:53, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jersey photo fake, directs to spam
Talk:Uruguayan Civil War

message: Hallo, at the time of the civil war the kingdom of Italy did not exist yet. The indication of Italy as combatant is wrong. Regards, Alex2006 10:29, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Some Italian state was a combatant I think. --Ineffable3000 17:10, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed it to the Kingdom of Sardinia which appears to be correct. --Ineffable3000 18:44, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Italian exiles took part in the fighting as volunteers, but AFAIK no Italian state entered the war. Garibaldi certainly wasn't fighting as a soldier in the pay of the Kingdom of Sardinia, which had a warrant out for his arrest. He was involved because he happened to be living in Montevideo at the start of the siege and had won a reputation as a guerrilla leader during Rio Grande do Sul's attempt to break away from Brazil. This led him to raise a volunteer force among the city's Italians to fight for the Colorados. --Folantin 10:46, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What do you propose we call Giribaldi's forces? --Ineffable3000 23:57, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "Italian volunteers" (as in, e.g. Finnish Civil War)? Kirill Lokshin 21:52, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Kirill's suggestion seems sensible, unless the volunteers were organized into a named formation. Carom 21:55, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They were called the Italian Legion (source: Jasper Ridley Garibaldi). There was also a French Legion made up of French immigrant volunteers in Montevideo. Again, its formation had nothing to do with the regular French army or the French government. --Folantin 22:03, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed. I was only pointing out that, if they had an actual name, the could be listed under it - something like "Italian volunteers (Italian Legion)" or vice versa. It might simply be enough to combine all the various volunteers as something like "French and Italian volunteers," but that might not be precise enough. Carom 22:07, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Italy as fighter? 

message: This Page seems to have had i ts content deleted someone with some info should fix it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.154.12.241 (talk) 16:02, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  This Page has Nothing on it 

message: I am moving the text about this civil war from the Platine War article to here. Anyone who wants to use it, feel free to. Regards. - --Lecen (talk) 12:41, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sourced text
Talk:Charley Lau

message: For whatever reason this article had the spelling of Charley wrong, he used "Charley" and not "Charlie".  I have moved the page.  For verification you can see his son's website Charley Lau's School of Hitting.
--Wgfinley 15:11, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page Move 

message: At the start of this article, it states that Charley Lau died in March 1984, making him 50 years old at the time of his death.  However, the box to the right indicates that he is still living, and is now 74 years old.  Probably the originating author should correct this discrepency.
AAARanger5  —Preceding signed but undated comment was added at 02:47, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discrepency 
Talk:John McLaren (baseball)

message: Fine, you win. I'm not about fighting people anymore. Tromboneguy0186 (talk) 04:53, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ludwig Yorck von Wartenburg

message: of alleged English ancestry. Not correct. He is of  Kashubian ancestry. His father changed the name Jark von Gostkowski to Yorck.--Tresckow 09:45, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ancestry 

message: This article should stand under the lemma Johann.... or Ludwig...
Hans is an affectionate name.--Tresckow 09:49, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: Jark von Gostkowski was born in a Polish city Bytow was a part of Poland in 1759. It wasnt a part of Prussia till the first partition.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.234.9.217 (talk) 00:57, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bytow
Talk:White Flag Trade

message: Third opinion as solicited at the baseball wikiproject talk page. Plainly put, "infamous" is a form of editorial language, and should not appear in Wikipedia's voice in keeping with WP:NPOV. It is used in sources, but its use in the article should be attributed to the author of the source. In other words, the article shouldn't say "the trade is infamous", but can say "the trade has been described as "infamous" by XYZ" or some similar wording. oknazevad (talk) 00:36, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: , thank you for commenting here, that makes sense. I know this is a slightly different issue from what was asked on the wikiproject talk page, but do you then have any thoughts on the second question here--whether there is value in adding that language ("the trade has been described as 'infamous'...") to the lede or if that is duplicative of the line about fans maligning the trade at the time? Alyo (chat·edits) 01:15, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I think there's value in describing reaction to the trade both in contemporary and retrospective perspectives. The word "infamous" itself is used in the title of a retrospective piece (and inherently the term has a connotation of retrospection), so I'd use it in that fashion. oknazevad (talk) 02:48, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: , I've expanded the legacy section (and restructured the article), so let me know what you think and we can work on the balance of the lede. Alyo (chat·edits) 03:34, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Section break
Talk:Timeline of modern Greek history

message: Did you use any other timeline of another country as a model for your work?--Yannismarou 10:09, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, because it is not about the history of a country. This is why i titled it "Greek history" and not "History of Greece". Since there are articles like: History of the Cossacks, History of the Zaza people, History of the Turkish people, History of Turkic people, History of the Basque people, History of the Jews in France, History of the Serbs, and many many more, which refer to "peoples" and not "countries", I suppose we can have an article for the "History of the Greek people"... And, i suppose, a timeline would do more good than harm, since it provides info in chronological order. Cause of page length limitations, i preferred to address only incidents of modern times. Hectorian 12:52, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No! It is not my problem if it is about a country or a people. I just wanted to know if there is any similar timeline (of another people - OK) for benchmarking or if it is an orginal idea of yours.--Yannismarou 19:54, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Julian and Gregorian dates are mixed together in the list. I assume that dates after 1923 are intended to be Gregorian and dates before Julian? There are some dates that don't match this form (eg sinking of Britannic in 1916.) This should be tidied up. Perhaps for the ambiguous period 1914-1923 both dates should be given. Drutt (talk) 14:11, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Dates

message: "Greece had very little effect on the WW2"  This sentence is not clear and may or may not be really bad writing.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:0:9200:6E4:99A5:1047:8DB8:FFC3 (talk) 08:26, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: World War II (1940–1944)
Talk:Phase-transfer catalyst

message: This seems to me a well-written and clear short article, with a very good example in the first section. However I find the second section more confusing, especially the first paragraph "In the PTC process, the same concept applies, that of transporting ionic species from one phase to another. The difference lies in the fact that with PTC, a chemical reaction is promoted and nothing is “isolated” or “purified" during the reaction process. Instead, PTC promotes organic synthesis reactions by transferring mutually insoluble reactants into a common phase."
Are there really two different types of process being compared here? I would have thought that PT catalysis is just a reaction using a PT catalyst as defined in the previous section. Can someone explain this "difference" more clearly? If not, perhaps this paragraph should be deleted. Other opinions please?    Dirac66 (talk) 02:27, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Well written except for one paragraph
Talk:Luke Appling

message: The article says that he has one of the longest at bats, fouling off 10 balls and having a 24 pitch at bat.  This is not cited and it does not add up.  Now, I have heard of him hitting 24 fouls on 9-19-40, but I don't know the validity of it and it isn't cited here.  The longest one I know of is Roy Thomas, who had 22 fouls, a full count, and a triple, putting him at around 26 pitches (I don't know if he had any strikes)...So thats why I took some of that out about him having the longest at bat.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.151.69.47 (talk) 00:34, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: 24th edition of Uncle John's Bathroom Reader, page 394, says it was 28 pitches - September 19, 1940 against Red Ruffing of the Yankees. :) 2001:56A:FA85:3800:5CAA:1E9C:D66:AA82 (talk) 22:31, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Longest At Bat 
Talk:Lou Boudreau

message: Boudreau's reputation includes being one of the slowest runners in the game and being a great Shortstop. Can anyone reconcile these two attributes? Was his positioning and anticipation just that good? 65.79.173.135 (talk) 20:20, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slow but Great Shortstop? 

message: I don't have a reference, but know it as a fact having heard and seen on TV many, many BH games he announced.  There's a good chance he occasionally announced a White Sox game as well, but WGN broadcast very few Sox games during that time.  All around, he could be called WGN's pinch hitting sports announcer.  Smallbones(smalltalk) 22:53, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Almost sure he broadcast some Chicago Bears games on TV during the 1960s and 70s, and certainly on radio. Smallbones(smalltalk) 01:17, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll vouch for that: I heard him on a few Black Hawks radio games growing up in Chicago. I recall he was a color man for Lloyd Pettit. Sad to say, Lou didn't add much to the effort. Great ballplayer, great baseball mind, but very flat on the air, even doing baseball. WHPratt (talk) 01:23, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Also announced for the [[Chicago Black Hawks]] 
Talk:Samuel Thomas von Sömmerring

message: The correct spelling of Samuel Thomas von Sömmerring, is with two "r"'s. I've made the according changes, and moved the article. Mark t young (talk) 07:44, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Name spelling

message: This article says he studied Archaeopteryx. How the hell is that possible, when he died decades before the discovery of the first feather?? (1860) I'm deleting it until clarification. 24.218.136.62 (talk) 19:26, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Archaeopteryx
Talk:Lefty Gomez

message: Cleanup of the anecdotes is needed; many are in the main section "baseball career" and in the subsection of anecdotes. The Lazzeri story is told 3 times! Chris the speller (talk) 20:12, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Anecdotes repeated

message: — Assignment last updated by Noah0314 (talk) 19:49, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: HIST273
Talk:Rick Ferrell

message: Shouldn't there be a section on his HoF status? I have nothing against the guy but his brother, a Pitcher, was a better hitter than he was. Of course, Wes was probably the best-hitting Pitcher who stayed a Pitcher. But Rick's offense, given the context of a very high-scoring era, was just not that impressive. I may do a section like that, although I'm not wild about being negative about someone who was apparently a good guy and certainly a good defensive Catcher. Still, Bill Freehan would be a better HoF choice. 71.192.59.174 (talk) 02:06, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The article articulates that he was one the top hitting catchers of his era, when combined with his better than average defensive skills and longevity at a difficult fielding position, it doesn't seem very controversial.Neonblak talk -  19:26, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversial HoF Selection? 

message: Thanks to all who contributed to elevating this to a GA status. If anyone wants to have a look at Birdie Tebbetts, that is another article quite close to being a GA.Orsoni (talk) 10:23, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thanks For GA
Template talk:Maurya Empire infobox

message: I just created this Maurya Empire infobox for transclusion into all articles relating to the Maurya Empire. Rumpelstiltskin223 10:24, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Created

message: * I have no opinion on whether Greek should or should not be mentioned in this infobox; however, if it is (as it is in the currently protected version), the link should be to Greek language, which is an article about the language, and not to the disambiguation page Greek.  Russ (talk) 14:44, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. ~ Amalas rawr =^_^= 15:06, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link