lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Mori

message: Dbz image > []
MOORI
Wise and witty Moori inherited his mystical Namekian powers from Guru, before the Namekian patriarch passed on. He is now the current "father" of the Nameks and lives on New Namek. Moori gives advice to Dende when help is needed and can summon Porunga, the Namekian dragon.
Moori image > []
mori 79.124.21.103 (talk) 10:11, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Talk:A Day in Hollywood / A Night in the Ukraine

message: The description of act 1 is pretty broad and could be more accurate.
Currently it says:
"The first act, A Day in Hollywood, a revue of classic Hollywood songs of the 1930s performed by singers and dancers representing ushers from Grauman's Chinese Theatre, features a significant amount of tap dance."
1) It's not really a revue. Most of the music in the first act was written for the show, so only a section of it (the Richard Whiting Medley and Thanks For The Memories) is a revue. 
2) There is one tap dance number, and a few other places that might or might not be tap danced, so "features a significant amount of tap dance" doesn't really characterize what the first act is about" either.
:Responding to this - revues can indeed feature original music and/or sketches written specifically for the show - all the New Faces revues, for instance, or Berlin's "Music Box" revues and other similar shows of that era - plus others like the Styne/Comden/Green "Two On The Aisle" or more contemporary revues like "Little By Little" or "Scrambled Feet." Or, "The Mad Show" (which featured Sondheim's song "The Boy From..."). And, there are two tap dance numbers - the most famous one is "Doin' The Production Code," but "Famous Feet" also uses tap. I do agree, however, that the phrase "significant amount" is misleading. I'm going to add some edits on the main page to help. 2601:182:CF80:D8A:9C82:8:B71B:B496 (talk) 22:03, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  plot overview 

message: It was asserted that this play violated copyrights by mimicking the Marx Brothers characters. I don't know the details but the page ought to have something about it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:305F:B560:E10A:62DF:D94D:4D54 (talk) 02:29, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  nothing about the big lawsuit? 

message: The play didn’t premiere in the West End - it premiered in the New End Theatre, Hampstead, an 80-seater fringe theatre, and only later transferred to the Mayfair Theatre in the West End - “…from ‘New End’ to ‘West End’…”, as Frank Lazarus (who wrote the music, and appeared as the Carlo/ Chico character in both London and on Broadway) says in this interview. Jock123 (talk) 15:24, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a West End Premiere…
Talk:Dave Hill (comedian)

message: The article is being heavily edited by an editor that self-disclosed on their talk page that they are the subject of the article. Please stop editing the page directly, and read WP:COI and follow the guidance therein. Also read WP:PROUD. Netherzone (talk) 01:53, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI tag (January 2024)
Talk:Black sesame soup

message: Is it always served hot? This should be added to the article. Badagnani 21:37, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Benjwong 21:44, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hot or cold?

message: In regard to this edit, in the future kindly discuss prior to guessing and reverting many times, when requested. It's much more productive to do so. We are an encyclopedia and we should not base our Chinese readings on guesses, but instead on sources and collaborative discussion, with the correct information emerging through the careful analysis of the evidence. Badagnani (talk) 20:03, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Double standard much? Why must we carefully analyze sources just to get a simple pronunciation out while there are no complaints about how something is pronounced in English (such as "David Oei")? You do not even know the language, so it's best you keep quiet about the subject. GraYoshi2x►talk 20:33, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

text: Indeed, let's all source every single pronunciation to make sure it's verifiable and correct so our holy encyclopedia is not questioned. Anyways, as I said before, you have no understanding of Chinese; why question a person who does? GraYoshi2x►talk 20:45, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

text: Your source was another Wikipedian, as seen on your talk page. I'm just going to pretend this discussion never happened, as you are obviously trying to discriminate against me and all my contributions by nitpicking minor faults and insulting me with them. It's just not okay. GraYoshi2x►talk 21:06, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm reverting it to the second tone - I'm a native speaker of Chinese. InfernoXV (talk) 17:59, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

text: I'll discuss this. The 'Fifth Tone' is a theoretical tone which nobody pronounces - it doesn't exist in real life. In speech, the Fifth Tone usually becomes either the second or fourth. InfernoXV (talk) 08:32, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it doesn't and it isn't. Tone 5 is a short tone which has no emphasis and varies widely depending on dialect. Changing it to the second tone would therefore be inaccurate. GraYoshi2x►talk 01:22, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 

message: The quality of this article is clearly substandard according to wikipedia's guidelines. Requires cleanup for poor grammar, bad sources, and unverified facts. Payppp (talk) 20:22, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Quality of Article
Talk:Leonid Kinskey

message: Many television appearances including 1964 My Favorite Martian. I am wondering if the article on Leonid Kinskey should expand to included his many notable television appearances? His characters are very distinctive.The Budzone guy 00:44, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

message: I have added the "Unreliable sources" template at the top of this article. As I write this post, the article contains four citations from Ancestry.com and two from IMDb, both of which are considered not reliable by WP standards. Perhaps someone can find better sources to replace those. Eddie Blick (talk) 23:57, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unreliable sources 

message: There are reliable sources (obits in NYT and The Independent) citing 1903 as his birth year so I will re-add this. As for the cited passenger list on Ancestry from 1924 showing that he was 30, are we sure this is not in fact a misinterpretation of 20? It could easily happen as these records were all handwritten. Crisso (talk) 11:26, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Birth Year
Talk:Pioglitazone

message: the following citation addresses lowering of bone density during treatment:
Kahn S et al. Glycemic durability of rosiglitazone, metformin, or glyburide monotherapy. NEJM 2006; 355: 2427-43.
Victoriaedm (talk) 14:22, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

message: The licenced form is pioglitazone hydrochloride ? Can we describe that as well ? - Rod57 (talk) 12:27, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chemistry/formulation/hydrochloride
Talk:Boeing Condor

message: I think this article needs pictures, I am trying to get hold of some. Does anybody have any? Djmckee1 06:27, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

message: looking at its references, I'd say this article needs to be rewritten.--Astroview120mm 02:46, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nearly complete copy of its reference 
Talk:Les Horaces

message: Citation tags are used when you want to challenge facts. They should be used selectively when you think something is wrong. I have now given a general source and removed them. -- Kleinzach 09:52, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Frivolous use of citation tags

message: I have just corrected the bass link etc., but why are the roles half in Italian and half in French? -- Kleinzach 13:38, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Roles
Talk:Parkland Elementary School (Quesnel)

message: I have classified this article as a stub. The section headings provide information about how the article can expand as the actual text of the article makes it a substub outside the infobox. Capitalistroadster 06:35, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Classification as stub

message: I believe ths article should be deleted.  This is an elementary school.  It is not well recognized.  On wikipedia many articles on high schools have been deleted.  This is only an elementary school.--Juthani1 (talk) 03:04, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion

message: This article was redirected to School District 28 Quesnel .  For further discussion, go to Talk:School District 28 Quesnel.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 14:48, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirected to [[School District 28 Quesnel]]
Talk:Nuclear power in Finland

message: The source cited in this section does not support the statements there at all. Not even remotely. The planning section states that renewables are not being developed due to monopoly conditions. The PDF cites environmental concerns, a lack of capacity for hydro-electric power and local opposition to wind mills! As such I've changed the planning section to reflect this. If someone wants to revert it, then they need to find an impartial source. I suspect whoever added this in was anti-nuclear and was simply hoping no one would actually check the source. I've also added the page number for future reference, if anyone would like to read it. Hvatum (talk) 06:35, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Planning

message: There is a discussion which is also related to this article or category. You are welcome to take a part of this discussion. Beagel (talk) 15:17, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming 

message: I am disturbed with reference n.3:
Mycle Schneider (9 September 2011). "Fukushima crisis: Can Japan be at the forefront of an authentic paradigm shift?"
where I read:
"A staggering 94 percent of Italians voted in a June referendum not to re-launch a nuclear program, ..."
With 50,594,868 italian voters and 25,643,652 votes against a nuclear re-launch, how is it
that 94% of "Italians" voted against ?
It looks to me more like a 50.68%
And I, would add, under the full emotional Fukushima News effect, but that is another story.
--Robertiki (talk) 15:06, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference to incorrect information 

message: Is there really any need for an image of what Greenpeace thinks of nuclear power? We all know what they stand for, something they have made perfectly clear.
If images relating to support/opposition must be added, then both sides should be represented. A single big image on a small page not only looks overly biased, and that the article or the section talks about it, but also gives the impression that it is a closed matter. Since most Finns (according to the article) are for nuclear power, then it doesn't make much sense to have a lone large image depicting the oppositional views of a fringe group. It would have made a lot more sense if it was the actions of one of the political parties.
If I erect a monument to the benefits of Finnish nuclear power and take a picture of it, will you add that here as well? What a about tweets, blog entries, news articles? Or does it have to be a big rock (gravestone)? DukeTwicep (talk) 21:02, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greenpeace activity 

message: The following was part of Electricity sector in Finland before I replaced the nuclear power section with an excerpt. I couldn't figure out a way to incorporate it in a natural way here. Perhaps someone else can --2001:14BA:84A6:DE00:E105:F2FF:A57B:1EC1 (talk) 07:29, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ownership in foreign plants
Talk:Sugarcane juice

message: The page says Evaporated Cane Juice is a healthy alternative to cane sugar. No substantiation is offered, nor references. If, indeed, Evaporated Cane Juice is the same as Garapa, there are health risks identified in the Garapa article that seam to contradict the claims on this page. jsandoe, 10 August 2009  —Preceding undated comment added 19:14, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The health claims seem to be based on the concept that processing food, regardless of what that might involve, makes it less healthy.  The actual nutritional difference is negligible.  The article now uses enough distancing words in that sentence, and enough evidence to the contrary immediately afterwards, that I don't really think it's a problem, but still: May I point out another food that is quite heavily processed: Drinking water.  Would these people have us believe it's a better idea to drink unprocessed water from streams and lakes instead of taps?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.196.176.188 (talk) 17:52, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Where is the source for the health claims? You're conflating "logical" with "supported by evidence". No evidence = doesn't belong here. 75.169.254.154 (talk) 03:19, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Article makes unsubstantiated health claims

message: Can this articale also be linked to "evaporated cane juice"?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.115.236.120 (talk) 15:43, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  evaporated cane juice? 

message: The intro paragraph claims that evaporated cane juice is just a euphemism for refined white sugar.  Is this true?  Based on the name, it seems like an unrefined mix of white sugar, brown sugar and molasses; basically sugar cane juice without the refining.  Anyone know for sure?  --Karuna8 (talk) 01:37, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't believe it's accurate, and I don't even know what that's doing there, because evaporated cane juice is a dry, granulated product. I would recommend removing the sentence entirely. Badagnani (talk) 01:39, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evaporated cane juice = refined white sugar? 

message: I propose the merger of the garapa article into sugarcane juice. Garapa is the portuguese term of sugarcane juice, and it's not distinct for the rest of the drinks in other countries besides Brazil. --Itzcuauhtli (talk) 15:37, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I strongly agree to this - we should definitely merge both together. Mmkaram (talk) 07:36, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, indeed. Candleabracadabra (talk) 02:02, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  It has more than one meaning though. Maybe just link it? Khaophaestus (talk) 12:26, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: — Assignment last updated by Hr54ankush (talk) 01:52, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Community Economic and Social Development II
Talk:A Year with Frog and Toad

message: The "official site for A Year with Frog and Toad" looks more like a blog about frogs and toads. There are links supposedly to pages about Lobel but there's also stuff about the care of amphibians as pets, etc. PurpleChez (talk) 20:34, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: External links
Talk:Arecales

message: Against for mergin to Arecaceae, even if there is only one Genus in it, because of th linking. I suppose that there are lots of possibilities of misunderstanding within human and bot editors, as the matter of linkage between languages now. This is not the one and only possibility to mess editors. Yours --Höyhens (talk) 00:01, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Why we should merge this two, one is familia and one is ordo? Alphama (talk) 08:53, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Talk:Scaloppine

message: Is it sometimes covered in cheese? Badagnani 08:19, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cheese

message: Shouldn't the first sentence in the etymology section read "the term 'scaloppine' derives from the French 'escalope?'" Currently it says "the term escalope derives from the French escalope." This seems incorrect. If they are the same word, then it's not a derivative word, it's a loan word.
Also, the article's title is "'scaloppine," not "escalope." Why does this page need an etymology for "escalope," which is used nowhere else in the article?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8806:2209:2D00:FCB0:BBEC:2FF4:4E24 (talk) 00:28, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Etymology section
Talk:Ahrntal

message: according to maps, there is one in the middle of the municipiality. --Mateus2019 (talk) Mateus2019 (talk) 09:50, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: In which maps? Mai-Sachme (talk) 19:42, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  is there a hamlet of the same name?
Talk:International H.K.D. Federation

message: We could certainly use some help with the romanization of the Korean words in this article. Kbarends 07:10, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Romanization
Talk:List of Moderators of the General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church (USA)

message: The title of this article suggests that it should be redirect to Moderator of the General Assembly which is the correct title. It is also a list, and should be named as such. I propose that this page be moved to List of Moderators of the General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church (USA) and this title be redirected to Moderator of the General Assembly. Blarneytherinosaur gabby? 07:16, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Naming

message: the full title for the vice-moderator of the 220th General Assembly is
The Rev. Dr. Tom Trinidad
173.224.10.227 (talk) 01:56, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  request edit 
Talk:Menat

message: "For members, it served as a protective amulet..."  Members of what?  Spikebrennan 20:43, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right -- that doesn't make sense. Turns out it was added in an edit going back to 15 June 2006, and it didn't make any sense then either (it's not like something was deleted later that gave that line some sense.) Am pretty sure the intended meaning in this case is "For believers" (likely of a certain cult). Changing... Captmondo 20:58, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Whoever named this article "stub" doesn't know anything about "menat". Everything is very well explained: the origin and the necklace itself. The only criticism you may utter should be that there isn't a photo of a corresponding necklace. Perhaps someone can find it in a museum. --92.77.14.236 (talk) 09:05, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: rerated now. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 09:17, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale." 

message: I would like to know about the rows, and if the dangly things at the bottom counted as a row. 173.197.211.18 (talk) 22:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The rows
Talk:Blind trust

message: On the one hand, we have something that seems perfectly honorable for a politician to do: put his or her own money into a blind trust so as to avoid particular conflict of interest in legislative matters which might impact different investments differentially.
On the other hand, in the UK discussion, we seem to have something that seems questionable - a fund which pays politicians but for which no one (not even the politicians?) knows who the contributors to the fund are.--Jimbo Wales (talk) 19:37, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does this article conflate two different things? 

message: This article initially suggests that a grantor is different from a beneficiary: "Blind trusts are generally used when a trust creator (sometimes called a settlor, trustor, grantor, or donor) wishes to keep the beneficiary unaware..." However, it then suggests that they are the same: "the trustee must not be affiliated with, associated with, related to, or subject to the control or influence of the grantor (the political official)." (Presumably, the political official is the beneficiary.) Perhaps they can be the same person in certain circumstances, but with the current wording, it's somewhat confusing. I think that it should be clarified. (I'm far from an expert on these issues and would not be the one to do so.) 74.71.77.7 (talk) 05:59, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beneficiary vs. grantor 

message: The article said that a trustee *should not* be a relative and cited a Senate document. However, that document is clearly contradictory - In one sentence, it says the trustee cannot be related to the beneficiary and then in the next sentence it uses the "should not" language. Obviously, the former is correct (according to the actual US Code). So I've removed that reference and the incorrect language and instead substituted a reference to the actual US Code which is clear. However, the USC is not a 3rd-party source so technically this is unacceptable for wikipedia. However, in this case, the obvious 3rd-party source is clearly wrong so it makes no sense to use it. What's the solution? Donlibes (talk) 01:51, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relative as Trustee
Talk:Eugenio Corti

message: Someone who has the patience might be able to bring over some information from the long Italian WP article. It has a lengthy account of Corti's WW II military service, not all of which might be vital to have in the English article, but does mention that he won a Catholic Culture prize for his writing. He also wrote a history of the Christian Democratic party of Italy. The references in the Italian WP article aren't very good. One might learn more by searching the author's own web site (also in Italian) for third-party commentary.  EdJohnston 17:23, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Italian WP has a long article, but not well-referenced 
Talk:Zytel

message: how strong is it
:"Strong as steel" is commonly used by manufacturers to tout Zytel products (presumably by weight, not volume).  I'll see if I can get some hard numbers or solid comparisons from DuPont's site and stick them in the article.  scot 18:57, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Strong?

message: Moved to talk, too long. RJFJR (talk) 16:23, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Types
Talk:Caslon Antique

message: Found this which contradicts the article. ⇔ ChristTrekker 19:26, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Apparently, Casablanca is Corel's commercial derivation (read "copy") of Caslon. 
But don't take my word for it, search http://www.cheshiredave.com/mastication/covers/200311/snicket.html for "caslon" :-)  
There are a few other google links hinting this is the truth, though I didn't (in 5 mins) find any really good sources establishing either as fact. 85.227.226.235 (talk) 22:00, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  which came first, Caslon or Casablanca?
Talk:Civil inattention

message: This page appears to be entirely copied from one source.  I'm not sure what the Wiki policy around this type of article is, so if someone will tag it properly, that will be appreciated.  Perhaps a move to Wikitionary?  Paul Haymon 07:48, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe this has been dealt with. Thanks, --jjron (talk) 03:05, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Copying/Major edit needed

message: Goffman noted that "when men and women cross each other's path at close quarters, the male will exercise the right to look for a second or two at the female ... Civil inattention, then, can here involve a degree of role differentiation regarding obligations".[9] Such a public double standard has been challenged by feminists, who resent the expectation that female appearance or behavior may be routinely commented on.
The part about men's "right to look for a second or two at the female" is quite incomprehensible to me, since the article seems to have established, before, that the whole concept of civil inattention necessarily involves looking briefly at one another in passing. I suspect this quote is somehow about something else, but it's rather mysterious.
And what does one (looking at a passing female stranger) have  to do with the other (commenting on women's appearance or behaviour)? Again, I can imagine there  is some meaningful context in the (single?) original source, but I'm at a loss about how all of it ties together. 2A02:8108:1140:945:244B:BAAF:C1CF:404C (talk) 19:54, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incomprehensible/non sequitur?