Talk:Microsoft Hearts

message: :Image:HeartsVista.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:19, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:HeartsVista.png

message: :Image:HeartsVista.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:19, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:HeartsVista.png

message: I am kinda curious as to what would actually happen should the scenario of one person only having blood cards (point cards) on deal.  I would guess the human version if the game would just allow a re-deal and nullify the hand, but computers, being so inflexible and simply running on a pre-programmed script system...? Would windows crash the game, or would it re-deal... or heaven forbid, just not allow the player to play a card from then to eternity (thus requiring a restart of the game).
Has anyone actually run into this problem, or maybe the game itself is programmed to not deal this specific hand (thus not even being random (albeit pseudo anyway) dealing the cards anyway.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by MrZoolook (talk • contribs) 08:24, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It is possible but unlikely that this exists in the program as a bug, but I suspect that the programmers thought of this or learned about it through testing and prevent this case by checking for it after a shuffle. If I were the programmer, I would make this an easter egg and display something humorous, but I suspect that the MS programmers had no such latitude and just reshuffle instead.Jarhed (talk) 02:06, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unresolved scenario. 

message: I play Hearts with MS Windows 7 Home Premium Ver 6.1 Build 7601:Service Pack 1
For some time I have suspected that it has a bug in it.
I am now sure.  I just played the King of Clubs on a hand and the West player won it with a Jack of Clubs.  Unfortunately, I can not document it since the poor implementation keeps no log of hands played.
I find it implausible that I am the only one who has witnessed this behavior.  Unfortunately, the trick is swept off the board fairly quickly after the trick so even a screenshot is very difficult to acquire.
The bug is, as far as I can determine, random in nature, but possibly has to do with my clicking the left mouse button. For what its worth.  I doubt if MS will be interested in such a bug173.189.74.11 (talk) 21:05, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I checked online and don't see anything listed.  You have to hit the Print Screen button fast to catch bugs.  I noticed bugs in the Vista version at times, but was never fast enough to catch them.  Dream Focus 22:52, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bugs 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Microsoft Hearts. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080123115034/http://www.utipu.com:80/app/tip/id/398/ to http://www.utipu.com/app/tip/id/398
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:26, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Jasper Deng has restored his version of the article with a "minor" edit, in a context in which a minor edit is used to designate vandalism.  Like all of his edits to the article, he only posts his preferred version.  He doesn't have another version of the article he claims is a better baseline version to define the consensus version.  In the edit comment, he claims that a page that was untouched for over three months "never had consensus".  Unscintillating (talk) 02:37, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I used Twinkle, which I did not know does that by default. If I had reverted manually, I definitely would not have done that. You can't reasonably expect me to keep up with every change in the implementation of Twinkle.--Jasper Deng (talk) 04:58, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor edit