lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Bonnet macaque

message: I rated this as "high" because I believe the species is common in documentaries and such begging for food from people.  But  maybe I overrated it.  Rlendog (talk) 20:38, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm bumping it to up to start class, and I'd have to say it deserves "Mid" at best.  Personally, I've never heard of them in any documentaries I've seen. – VisionHolder « talk » 23:24, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Mid is good by VH's nifty new neato assessment scheme. :D - UtherSRG (talk) 06:22, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Importance Rating

message: I have posted a long comment in the Talk section of the main Macaque genus article, about the renaming of all the macaque species articles to "[Name] Macaque" (e.g. "Barbary Macaque") from their traditionally names (e.g. Barbary Ape).
Would you please take a look at that here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Macaque#Killer_Dolphins
And then correct this individual species article as necessary — I'm not sure which macaque species may have actually been called "[Name] Macaque" traditionally.
(And I hope you can see that the fact that I don't know that, after reading a Wikipedia article about the species, is why rewriting reality in Wikipedia is a problem.)
Thanks!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.180.30.135 (talk) 12:24, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Killer Dolphins 
Talk:Formosan rock macaque

message: Notes
I have posted a long comment in the Talk section of the main Macaque genus article, about the renaming of all the macaque species articles to "[Name] Macaque" (e.g. "Barbary Macaque") from their traditionally names (e.g. Barbary Ape).
Would you please take a look at that here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Macaque#Killer_Dolphins
And then correct this individual species article.
Thanks!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.180.30.135 (talk) 12:23, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

message: I have posted a long comment in the Talk section of the main Macaque genus article, about the renaming of all the macaque species articles to "[Name] Macaque" (e.g. "Barbary Macaque") from their traditionally names (e.g. Barbary Ape).
Would you please take a look at that here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Macaque#Killer_Dolphins
And then correct this individual species article.
Thanks!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.180.30.135 (talk) 12:23, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: killer dolphins
Talk:Metedeconk River

message: On the heading Tributaries: I don't think the North and South Branches of this river quite qualify as tributaries.  A tributary is a smaller water feeding a larger water, whereas the North and South Branches of the Metedeconk are just the two halves of the same river.  But...whatever floats your boat. --Lensim 13:47, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Demographics of Malaysia

message: Decline of nearly 11 percent
https://www.dosm.gov.my/v1/index.php?r=column/cthemeByCat&cat=430&bul_id=aVlJRDAvbjhWWEhQa1YvSWhsSjF3QT09&menu_id=L0pheU43NWJwRWVSZklWdzQ4TlhUUT09
62.226.70.180 (talk) 23:04, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Massive drop in the number of births in the first quarter 2021
Talk:Federal Law Enforcement Training Centers

message: Added one citation. Avignonesi (talk) 10:32, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Citation Added

message: Some of the verbiage here (e.g., "the finest professionals") seems a bit brochurey to me.
:The entire thing reads like a brochure.  I actually came to this talk page expecting people to be asking whether this article was written by the FLETC's own PR department.  74.137.105.169 (talk) 15:21, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Blatant bias is not a neutral point of view. The article should be tagged. I will tag it. - 67.224.51.189 (talk) 14:38, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The FLETC reviewed and updated the information as of July 6, 2011.
Looks resolved to me. Cowbert (talk) 07:01, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV

message: The Secret Service has its own facility - it does not participate in the 105 flavors of cop facilities.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.80.242.31 (talk) 03:21, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  105 flavors of fed cop
Talk:The One Where Ross Meets Elizabeth's Dad

message: Does anyone notice that the guys love Die Hard and they don't recignize Bruce Willis??
sohmc 13:53, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: But in the show, he's NOT BRUCE WILLIS!!--HDC7777 16:28, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The guys are ''[[Die Hard]]'' fans
Talk:United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.

message: I'd never before heard "the loss of the studio's rights to their own classic film libraries" was due to the Paramount case.  How are the two events linked?  --Jeremy Butler 13:54, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed it.  Looking back at the edit history, it sounded like someone was speculating that this decision was a factor in a few studios' sale of rights to their libraries.  The speculation was probably that the studios lost money because of this decision and had to sell something.  Without citations I'm removing all the speculation about this.  Tempshill 21:20, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

text: "Clear" it may be ... but without a citation it's pure original research. Daniel Case 22:01, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Film Libraries? 

message: In addition to the infobox I have polished the article some and added some direct quotes from the decision in a section discussing it. It sounds a little less like it was written by a first-year law student now. But it still needs attention from an expert ... we have an outline of its effect on film production and distribution but, despite saying over and over that it is an important antitrust case (and it is). Someone who can speak to its effect on subsequent jurisprudence more effectively than I is needed. Daniel Case 15:41, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs some expert attention

message: The article says that rates charged by studios to exhibitors rose from 35% to 50% without any citations; those numbers would be important to know in terms of antitrust law and oligopoly theory. As a whole, this last section may benefit from being expanded (or it may become too tangential to the article). I will add a  tag. Worldsbestusername (talk) 06:01, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Exhibitor Rental Rates, Consequences

message: The following paragraph "bugs" me and I am not sure what the writer was trying to say:
Ultimately, this issue of the studios' unfair trade practices would be the reason behind all the major movie studios being sued in 1938 by the U.S. Department of Justice. Coincidentally, the Society of Independent Motion Picture Producers a group led by Mary Pickford, Samuel Goldwyn, Walter Wanger, and others filed a lawsuit against Paramount Detroit Theaters in 1942, the first major lawsuit of producers against exhibitors.
What exactly was the coincidence this paragraph refers to and also why are we talking about an event in 1942 when the next paragraph starts talking about 1940? 66.75.66.240 (talk) 08:18, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coincidentally ? 

message: This page claims The Godfather to be the first modern blockbuster, yet the page about Blockbusters claim that Jaws was the first. Seems like there should be consistency here.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ptousig (talk • contribs) 00:42, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blockbuster claim
Talk:Vijay S. Pande

message: Please delete it ... Its bogus article .... The information in your article about Vijay Pande is wrong ... He is a fraud guy  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.192.253.2 (talk) 18:28, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It states that he was born in 1970 and graduated high school in 1992. He would be 21-22 is this correct?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.180.121.113 (talk) 21:09, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I doubt this. The information put there I believe was by some IP and didn't include any citations. I was unable to confirm high school information except on Wikipedia mirrors which don't count. Thus I have removed the incited material. I also have improved the article, but I didn't include any information on Data of Birth. However, the accurate material now present can be used to infer his DoB. Jessemv (talk) 16:22, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age at graduation 
Talk:Priam's Treasure

message: the last portion of this article can be viewed as defamatory and should be modified to reflect neutrality the vandalizing of articles by sugar coated words should be avoided and punished  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.171.168.66 (talk) 11:01, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  neutrality 

message: Schliemann stole the treasure from its native land- Turkey. It's a historical court case which he accepted. We should mention it thoug. http://www.grandanzachotel.com/treasure-of-troy.htm --Kafkasmurat (talk) 13:45, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mention- Schliemann Stole It 

message: This article says that frank Calvert was involved in the discovery of the find - I never heard that and could find no proove. 80.134.96.165 (talk) 09:56, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Calvert?
Template talk:GA

message: Instead of:
:
in the last line, I suggest changing it to:
:
Took me a bit to realize that "Review" in this GA template was linking to the discussion. The goal here is to make the links more obvious, and to remove the need for "Reviewed version" by hyperlinking the date instead. We could also substitute  if that phrasing sounds better. Thoughts 
:This seems pretty good, actually. It could also say something like:
:
jp×g 03:26, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm confused about what the first proposal is even supposed to be because I don't understand where the links would go, and in the second one I only understand because I know what the two links are to and I know the second link is the review. That suggests to me that it's not a good solution, though I can see that the current situation may also be confusing to others. How about " passed as a good article following  on [date]"? — Bilorv (talk) 17:06, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Format for links in the GA template 

message: Add "subtopic" as an alias for "topic". I'm not sure where this misconception is coming from, but I've seen loads of users try to use the non-existent parameter "subtopic". — Bilorv(c)(talk) 17:22, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Done  I assume this is coming from  using  Galobtter (pingó mió) 07:00, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, probably. Thanks! — Bilorv(c)(talk) 10:53, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 5 September 2018 

message: I propose that my work at Special:Diff/1095069966 for the template be implemented. It is more consise by avoiding "one of the" (while also taking care of the a/an problem), and also de-italicizes "good article". Thanks. NotReallySoroka (talk) 05:19, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 26 June 2022 

message: Hi folks, I have undertaken a re-evaluation of Hans Bethe as a Good Article (mainly because I think it's still a good article but it has been a while since it achieved that status, not because of any problems I've found with the article). In doing so, I ran into a question about how to use this template.
On Talk:Hans Bethe there is already a  template, from the first time the article went through a thorough Good Article review from some folks.
I have added a second  template, so that now the talk page starts like this:
{{GA|09:13, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: @Charlesreid1,  is your friend. CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE (please mention me on reply) 01:01, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Graceful way to add an additional GA review

message: :Category:Wikipedia CD Selection-GAs has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Schierbecker (talk) 03:59, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: [[:Category:Wikipedia CD Selection-GAs]] has been nominated for discussion
Talk:Atlanta Exposition Speech

message: If I knew how to redirect, I would redirect searches for The Atlanta Compromise here. Can someone either tell me how to, or do it?--ViolinGirl 14:16, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect

message: Unless, I have my history wrong, although BTW's speech was a major moment in American Civil Rights, it was later criticized by intellectuals such as W.E.B. DuBois for being too lenient on segregation and Jim Crow.  It wasn't radical enough... perhaps this issue should be addressed?  See DuBois, The Souls of Black Folk (1903) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.68.104.254  (talk) 04:33, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Civil Rights?

message: This article is definitely missing the section on the Compromise of blacks in accepting Jim Crow and not pushing for Civil Rights while encouraging them to start as manual labor. Washington believed that higher education was not necessary yet, as the race had to be built up. DuBois vehemently opposed the compromise,
:Agree. futurebird (talk) 19:43, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical significance 

message: The name of the article should not refer to the "Atlanta Compromise" speech since that term was used by people opposed to its principles. The article cannot be called "Atlanta Exposition" since that would refer to the exposition/exhibition itself.  As the NAACP does, I have listed it as  "Atlanta Exposition Speech".Keizers (talk) 16:30, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of article should be Atlanta Exposition Speech 

message: As far as I can tell, there's no reason for these to be two separate articles.  They seem to have been separated based on the false idea that the Atlanta Compromise was some kind of formal agreement that took place as a result of the speech.  (Here's the original version of the Atlanta Compromise article after it was changed from a redirect: ) That is false, and I've removed that language from the article, so I really don't think that there's any reason for keeping it as a separate article from the speech.  To the extent that an "Atlanta Compromise" really did exist, it was just a societal consequence of this speech. Bueller 007 (talk) 17:12, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Atlanta Compromise]]
Talk:Reichskommissariat Ostland

message: Memel was never part of the conquered territories. It became half a year before the beginning of World War II part of Germany again.
:Probably true, strictly-speaking , but regaining Memel would still have been a product of Nazi expansionism and bullying of its neighbours. Folks at 137 14:40, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Memel wasn't gained back through bullying or threat of violence, but by a plebiscite. --41.146.31.66 (talk) 02:38, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Status of Memel

message: The order of "See also" headings and links is a little unorthodox for Wikipedia. Would it be better to make all of them subordinate (as is usual) to a single "See also" heading with subheads for German and Baltic political leaders, or does that confuse their roles in and responsibility for the occupation? —— Shakescene (talk) 10:39, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hierarchy of headings 

message: Isn't the translation of Reichskommissariat Ostland into English as Realm's Commissionerate of Eastland?
ArmchairVexillologistDonLives! (talk) 00:23, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: That may be true, but while few people know about Reichskommissariat Ostland, no one at all would know about the Realm's Commissionerate of Eastland. One good recent book (I think Hitler's Empire or The Third Reich at War) methodically anglicised all German terms, but it used something standard like "Eastern Territories" for the place. Reich has now become part of the English language, so the difficulty is in translating "Kommissariat". "Administration" is one weak possibility so I think I've seen something like "Reich Administration of the Eastern Territories". —— Shakescene (talk) 17:35, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Realm's Commissionerate of Eastland? 

message: I've created a simplified version of the map for the infobox that is legible without zooming. As a result I have moved the main fullsize admin map to a subsection of the Administration section. XrysD (talk) 19:21, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map Changes 
Talk:ʻIʻiwi

message: This doesn't seem like a stub anymore.  I'm going to remove that label, but feel free to replace it if appropriate. Davidlwilliamson (talk) 07:52, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page Status 

message: I'm not sure how to flag this article for "needs grammatical review"--perhaps there is such a Wikipedia flag--except just to state so here.  Punctuation in this article needs serious review, sentence fragments need to be fixed, etc.  Basic details are omitted (e.g., it doesn't mention the Maui populations).  (P.S.  Also, the article needs references for most of the basic content.)  philiptdotcom (talk) 15:36, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I would advise you to just be bold and bust a move, copyedit as you like and add references. It might take as much effort as it does to write on the discussion page. --Travis Thurston+ 21:18, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  article needs review for professionalism & details 

message: * Sound the ʻIʻiwi have been named after the noise that it made? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:11, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: It's name is more likely related to the word "kikiwi" which means "Bent or curved, as a bird beak" according to the Hawaiian Dictionary. Also likely related to the familiar kiwi of Aotearoa Anammox2017 (talk) 02:36, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology
Talk:Mattar paneer

message: Ridiculous page - - frivolous, trite. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.20.232.184 (talk • contribs)  on 09:34, 4 November 2005
How un-constructive. In 2005 the page was a simple sentence describing Mattar paneer, in the early wikipedia. Noting the existence of things in the world in an encyclopedia in progress is hardly frivolous. The comment left seems the more "ridiculous". It's better to help improve articles or leave things alone. Whitebox (talk) 00:06, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment 

message: I believe this article should be expanded because it is very small compaired to other Indian dishes' articles. Cyberguy410 00:54, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion 

message: The link in the lead section for poori currently leads to an article for a teledrama, which is completely unrelated to bread. I'm removing it for now. Radioactivated (talk) 23:57, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poori
Talk:List of recurring Saturday Night Live characters and sketches by cast member

message: I can't do all the merge tags now, as I'm going to class. I did the one Chevy Chase already. Also, we either don't have a page for Beth Cahill or her name is misspelled on this page. If the former, where should the information go?
To the IP who had a speedy on this while saying we'd merge the material -- generally it's considered best to stick a merge tag on for at least a couple of days, wait and see if anyone objects, and then just do it if no comment is made. A speedy makes impossible to access the information anymore once it goes through. Jacqui ★ 14:54, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Beth Cahill's information can just be deleted.  She only had one recurring character that wasn't that memorable. Leadpipevigilante 23:54, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: This link contains all recurring characters, but ti also says it includes some that only appeared once because they were so memorable. Still, it could be a help:
http://www.faqs.org/faqs/tv/sat-night-live/characters/
Jacqui ★ 18:01, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference?

message: They've already used this one three times this season - Jack Black, Matt Dillon, Kevin Spacey.  I can't remember the guy's name but the girl's last name is Wiig. SpikeZoft 02:51, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Two A-Holes?
Talk:Elastigirl (The Incredibles)

message: Shouldn't Elastigirl (film character) be at Elastigirl and Elasti-Girl (DC Comics) be at Elasti-Girl, maybe with a "For the Pixar/DC comics character see Elastigirl/Elasti-Girl" on the pages? --BodyTag 14:55, 4 November 2005 (UTC)

message: We don't need such a detailed plot summary of the movie - it's elsewhere. I've tried to cut it down but there's only so much I can take. DJ Clayworth (talk) 02:32, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot summary
Talk:Regressive autism

message: From the article: "It is more usual for autistic neurological development to not include such aberrations, with age-appropriate autistic symptoms being clear from birth, in which case the term "early infantile autism" is used."
:Is that true? My understanding is that autism is generally unnoticeable before the age of 2. Clearly it would be difficult to determine if a baby is autistic. Neurodivergent 15:05, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:   

message: I think there are some papers by the researchers at Kennedy Krieger and MIND Institute indicating regression occurs in children whose mothers have certain antibodies to fetal brain. 
This is very counter intuitive to me, but in the case of my own son it seemed to be true. His Mom has some of the antibodies, and he seemed to regress somewhere between 15 and 24 months. 
I don't know what the review papers say but the brain undergoes, or is supposed to undergo, certain programmed changes after birth that are suspected of causing autism when they don't go right. 
Such as apoptosis, which the article does hint at with the mention of larger brains in some kids who regressed. 
I think this is basically a good article but there could be more for parents who are looking.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.61.133.172 (talk) 19:14, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I would like to point out an issue that I think very relevant to the above comment.  A baby's immune system is said to be 'turned down' in the early months to avoid developing autoimmunity, while it receives useful maternal antibodies from milk.  In order to make vaccines work it is necessary to include adjuvants, like aluminium and mercury, or to combine vaccines (the mumps component of MMR is said to not work if administered on its own).  Adjuvants turn the immune system of the baby on, and so might be expected to render the baby more susceptible to antibodies to itself, in this case from the mother.   Do not assume therefore that nothing in the environment was involved.  Vaccination could well be the reason why maternal antibodies are able to cause inflammation and damage which would not otherwise occur.  While I know this is the place to discuss article entries rather than the topic generally, we have to start somewhere and then search for supporting material to cite. Lindosland (talk) 10:22, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maternal antibodies to fetal brain 

message: A merge of Regressive autism into Autism spectrum has been proposed. Please join the discussion.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xurizuri (talk • contribs) 09:06, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge done --Xurizuri (talk) 03:38, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge into Autism spectrum
Talk:Chinley

message: I read that Chinley Churn is 1484 feet high - hardly a nondescript hill, surely?
I live below Chinley Churn/ Cracken Edge and believe me it is not a nondescript hill!
I am currently looking at Chinley Churn, and there is nothing spectacular about it.  It's a very nice hill, and it's pleasant to walk up, but there's nothing really much else to say about it, or to distinguish it from dozens of others.--Rat 22:44, 8 July 2006 (UTC)