lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
File talk:FantUnivNov54.jpg

message: What story is the cover art for? The big feature by Algis Budrys? Wouldn't it count as a part of the story and thus potentially be included under the "[In human hands, and other contributions] By Algis Budrys" copyright renewal entry? Haukur 20:30, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Also - what are these registrations all about?  Haukur 20:58, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

text: Here's a search for Schomburg:  He does have a number of registrations and renewals to his name. Haukur 21:21, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: From what I know of the subject, no, Budrys would not get copyright.  In fact the Schomburg's copyrights that show up in your later search indicate that wasn't the standard practice.  I couldn't use your links -- I think there must be some state cookie info in them.  However, I searched for Schomburg separately and found no 1954 copyrights in his listings. Mike Christie (talk) 02:37, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think Budrys would get the copyright for the art - what I was wondering is if his registration of copyright for his story would be sufficient for Schomburg to get copyright for (what I assume is) an illustration to that story. I just don't really know how these registrations work or how specific they have to be. Haukur 08:26, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Again I would have thought this unlkely, but I'm no expert.  Is there somewhere on WP where this sort of question can be answered by experts? Mike Christie (talk) 11:17, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not really. Well, you could try Godwin. Haukur 18:22, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

text: I still think this is very shaky. I wish we had an expert. Haukur 12:44, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Doubts on copyright status
Talk:Culture in Belgrade

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians! I've begun to restructure this article. I have added sections for cultural events, cultural institutions and art. The article has a lot of unverified content that I've marked for lack of citation. 
I am certain that there is much more to be said and so I've begun to add more information. I am open to ideas and sources for expanding the article.
Mnlght83 (talk) 18:00, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restructuring the article
Talk:Seven Hogs

message: A duplicate :Magharee Islands page was recently created. I suggest merging its content to Seven Hogs and redirecting it. • Gene93k (talk) 19:19, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Cleaned up. Seven Hogs redirects to Magharee Islands. -DubhEire (talk) 14:00, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Magharee Islands
Template talk:Samsung phones

message: It'd be cool if there was a page for the Samsung T409, one of the few phones to work with the T-Mobile hot spot at home.  Mathiastck 20:33, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  untitled 

message: The cellphones are organized by their model numbers. However, model numbers of Samsung cellphones barely reflect their line of models. I think it might be useful to organize them by release date or form factor. I added Ultra Edition categories as they are strongly tied together. I'm also thinking about adding one for Blackjack if no one minds. 74.15.52.79 (talk) 18:49, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The website is organized by carrier.  I'm not sure that logically groups the phones into meaningful categories.  If we do it by release date, should we do it by year?  form factor might not provide enough meaningful categories, either.  --Zr2d2 (talk) 03:37, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Categories 

message: Create pages for:
* A717
* A727
* A737
* A930
* B2700  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.13.186.1 (talk) 00:40, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  To Do 

message: where be the Anycall Haptic?
http://electronics.howstuffworks.com/haptic-technology.htm  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.87.188.58 (talk) 11:01, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  yo! 

message: s400 s500 and z320 are ony some devices i know (see i-mode) mabdul 0=* 02:30, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  why is the s and z series mising? 

message: why is there an H entry "H1" containing incorrectly-punctuated encyclopaedic information in the G column? can someone confirm the existence/nonexistence of this model? i'm commenting the encylopaedic information for now. — Owl order (talk) 22:31, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  H series? 

message: The Navbox template can only go up to 20 List of Group, so it makes some group invisible, any idea to fix it? A tumiwa (talk) 04:29, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Group List 

message: This kind of thing really strains my inclusionism. Really? We need a page for every phone Samsung have ever made? This is like Pokemon all over again. —Tom Morris (talk) 22:12, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with you here, I think per WP:NOTADIRECTORY we should just include the notable phones here. All of the models that dont have an article can be redirected to Samsung Electronics. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 05:17, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this really required? 

message: I would like to see the list of mobiles presented in the same fashion as done for nokia - example  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Nokia_products
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.27.5.42 (talk) 11:22, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Is that the reason why some models are commented out and only those with actual articles about them have been left in? -Mardus (talk) 20:53, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Samsug Mobile List
Talk:Guča Trumpet Festival

message: See you in 2009! --chaizzilla (talk) 07:51, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Loose Lips (column)

message: This article reads like an advertisement for the newspaper (column), and it needs reliable and verifiable sources.  See WP:NOR. I added templates to this page.  The column is/was a gossip column and living persons are mentioned in it.  Editors of the article need to be careful in providing any material pertaining to living persons in Wikipedia space.  --NYScholar 20:35, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Tags
Talk:Opanak

message: The reference to mocasins as a shoe of the indigenous people of australia implies a pre 18th C item of footwear. The article on mocasins is about sheep shearers mocasins of the 19th and later centuries, which are not generally a product of the indegenous populations.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.12.195.65 (talk) 06:37, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Not having laces is listed as an attribute, but both the second photo and one type have laces. Can this discrepancy be clarified? --BB12 (talk) 00:24, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of laces?
Talk:Tandospirone

message: The cited study focused on individuals who have a history of drug abuse, these are the people that are supposed to have a higher limen of drug tolerance. Moreover, nowhere in the discourse was "without any significant adverse reactions" mentioned, whereas only "less impairments" were reported. Any seriously, what's the criterion for significance? I'm removing this unless there're more concrete evidences to come.
Davor.danach (talk) 01:41, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Without any significant adverse reactions mentioned?
Talk:Illanmaster

message: Have a look at the mapviewer view of Illanmaster from the Ordnance Survey Ireland website. The Historic Layer 6" map from the mid-19th century is remarkably inaccurate. That gives some idea of the inaccessibility of the location; most of those surveys have stood the test of time very well. jnestorius(talk) 19:42, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old OS maps
Talk:Bad Karma (My Name is Earl)

message: This is terrible. This is "fansite-not-updated-since-2000" quality. I can't salvage this one. --Jnelson09 20:41, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I did my best. --Jnelson09 20:21, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Saltee Islands

message: I'm not sure who is doing this, but it seems that someone is vehemently opposed to the addition of the national flag of the saltee islands. It is recommendable to have that national flag at the top sidebar, among other information (i.e. size, date discovered etc) and save the nature pictures for the middle or bottom or perhaps create a section dedicated to wildlife.--Klopsikon (talk) 19:23, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Flag

message: "They have been unoccupied since the early 20th century". They had a population of 6 in 1991. At least one of these facts is wrong. Nurg (talk) 10:52, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population
Talk:Thiocolchicoside

message: I'm on MuscoRil and it's prospectus claims that it's a GABA AGONIST (not antagonist) and also GLYCINERGIC AGONIST. It says no contraindication about seizures. Contraindications and side effects sections only tell about gastrointestinal problems.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.27.167.167 (talk) 06:56, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Karađorđeva šnicla

message: Ovaj deo za devojacki san je neprimeren za enciklopediju.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.46.249.138 (talk) 15:06, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: If Karadjordje had a big one we don't know, however, the form oft he steak may reminds of a certain thing of the man, and therefore the playful name.--Carski (talk) 21:53, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Girl's dream
Talk:Cuisine of Omaha

message: Given that we don't have many (if any?) other "Cuisine of a city" articles, and we don't have a Cuisine of Nebraska article, might I suggest that this article gets moved to the latter? FlagSteward 11:49, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, believe it or not, Nebraska could have its very own cuisine article that would equal or surpass this one in length and content. It turns out that a state made of immigrants has a diverse palette! So, I pull for leaving this where it is. Oh, and the city thing? There's Cuisine of New York City. – Freechild (¡!¡!¡!¡) 14:40, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Move to Nebraska?

message: Anybody else stumble across this article and laugh when they saw the half reuben sandwich picture?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.217.251.69 (talk) 02:52, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Reuben?
Talk:Pljeskavica

message: The article says nothing about what the dish contains besides meat. The fast food variant available in Sweden, anyway, usually contains a healthy dosage of garlic. Perhaps someone with more insight into the typical recipe could fill in? Daniel Väcklén (talk) 16:03, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contents 

message: The only source we have is Serbian tourist portal with one sentence claiming that pljeskavica originates from Serbia, but with no evidences represented. Just because it's Serbian tourist site doesn't mean it's reliable. Countries from South-Eastern Europe have some strange fetish for fighting over small things...
Just like Rakia...
Anyway, I searched for other sources. They confirms that Leskovacka pljeskavica is very popular etc, but they do not say from where pljeskavica originates. So, Ill would suggest to find another source which would conifrm that pljeskavica originates from Leskovac or remove that part.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.138.204.12 (talk) 15:41, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs more sources for origin of pljeskavica
Talk:Green Onions

message: This song also appears on "Big Wednesday" movie.
62.22.92.57 (talk) 09:51, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Does anybody know who has the sheet music rights?
FoolesTroupe (talk) 00:19, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sheet Music Project

message: Then how does ""Green Onions" is a hit soul instrumental recorded in 1962 by Booker T. & the M.G.s" correlate with ""Green Onions" is remarkably similar in style and chord progression to John Lee Hooker's "Onions", which appears on his 1963 album, The Big Soul of John Lee Hooker"?--85.210.23.161 (talk) 17:10, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: According to  JLH recorded his version in early 1962. 198.53.137.96 (talk) 06:51, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Similar recordings, huh? 

message: The original bass player was Lewie Steinberg. He played on and co-wrote the song. He was the house bass player at Stax Records at the time. He also introduced the drummer Al Jackson to Stax, Steve Cropper and Booker. He was also the “bass player” noted in this Wikipedia notice who originally wanted to name the song “Funky Onions”. The word Funky was considered a “low class” word in those days in 1962 so the label decided on Green Onions instead. Lewie did the first tour with the MGs but didn’t like being on the road away from his family so he was replaced with Steve Cropper’s high school friend Donald “Duck” Dunn shortly thereafter. Lewie Steinberg also played bass on the Mar Keys hit “Last Night” that was released the year before in 1961.  134.16.65.31 (talk) 15:14, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who was the bass player on Booker T and the MGs first release Green Onions ?
Talk:Order of St. Sava

message: : can you please provide at least one source that can verify the information you want to add? I could not find any. Thanks Wikipedia:Tutorial/Citing sources Aeengath (talk) 14:00, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I have emailed the document.  TruthUsea (talk) 16:27, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  Unfortunately source material must have been published, the definition of which wikipedia uses is: "made available to the public in some form". Therefore unpublished materials are not considered reliable. These are Wikipedia's rules Wikipedia:Citing_sourcesWikipedia:Verifiability#Reliable_sources. Also, this person does not seem to be notable enough to be on this list since there is no Wikipedia article about him.  Aeengath (talk) 18:11, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

text: I see no mention of the Order of St. Sava there Aeengath (talk) 20:05, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Adding recipients
Talk:McClain Airlines

message: New article on this airline which had shiny black 727s. Archtrain 20:51, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  
Talk:Sremski Karlovci

message: why does this contain the template Template:Kosovo municipalities?
thanks
MdupontBot (talk) 09:05, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template:Kosovo municipalities 

message: *Support long-standing proposal to merge from Buildings and structures in Sremski Karlovci following 2016 proposal; that page is very small and nothing more than a short list which can be incorporated easily on the town's page. Klbrain (talk) 11:12, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:CGK733 fraud

message: This article states very clearly in the first sentence that the (claims of the?) discovery has been falsified.
However, the second paragraph uses language that seems to state (and so validate?) those claims? i.e. "which has remarkable properties" and "have shown that it can extend the lifetime ... ".
Would it not be more appropriate, given the claim of falsification, to prepend those statements with an implicit dislaimer e.g. "The now discredited research claims stated that ..." 
?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.189.106.97 (talk) 20:30, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  possible confusion? 

message: --KingGeezer (talk) 20:35, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sorry; forgot to sign in before the prev comment
Template talk:Roads in Ontario Cities

message: This master template is starting to get large... It is okay right now, but I have a feeling that it will get large as our WikiProject Canada Roads expand. I suggest this: As soon as the template gets to 6 lines or more, we should start resizing. What I mean is start to separate the master template into sub templates like Southern Ontario, Southwestern Ontario, Golden Horseshoe, et cetera. Any Discussion?  Smcafirst | Chat  at 20:55, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Template starts to get large

message: In this case, we should simply widen the text area on the bottom template. i'll get to that shortly.  RingtailedFox • Talk • Stalk 00:42, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wider is better
Talk:Bat (disambiguation)

message: This page should just be bat, as bat is ambiguous in all cases. The primary sense of bat is not the animal. Mglovesfun 20:55, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Discussion at Talk:Bat#Requested_move. / edg ☺ ★ 03:39, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: Isn't it also the disc you place on a potter's wheel so you can get the pot off when you're done?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.73.70.113 (talk) 22:03, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes.  According to the article Potter's wheel, it is.  However, this page is supposed to be designed to disambiguate between Wikipedia articles and sections of articles, and we have no article or section titled Bat (Potter's wheel).  We could create one consisting of a section redirect to Potter%27s_wheel#Techniques_of_throwing, but that's as close as we can get them to that referent.  Should I? Chrisrus (talk) 00:00, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pottery 

message: The film section is missing the TV movie from 1960, starring Jason Robards and Helen Hayes.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.241.240.42 (talk) 17:46, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Film
Talk:Altar Stone (Stonehenge)

message: The altar stone is now being said not to be from Wales but somewhere further afield, likely more northerly. High barium content and not a "match" (presumably mass spectrometer) with other bluestones nor Welsh red sandstones. Also I believe the picture used may be wrong, as a previous post in talk suggests. I did not make the edit yet as nothing has been set in stone by the Aberystwyth team, will check back in the coming week
Source: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-67140221  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.29.7.19 (talk) 21:47, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  New information coming in 

message: Stonehenge is in Wiltshire, yes, but it is not a building. Its only roof has ever been the sky and it's never had walls. 
Dee Fraser 17:26, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a building 

message: This tweet claims we have:
https://twitter.com/altarstonetheo1/status/1271795722405523457?s=20
©Geni (talk) 18:49, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: We may have a picture of the wrong stone
Talk:Kristina Kovač

message: Kristina Kovač is certanly not the biggest pop star in Serbia (as it was stated in the article), not even close to that. She and her sister (as K2 duo) also were not the biggest atraction (as it was stated). Vanjagenije (talk) 11:13, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Biggest star???
Talk:Nautor's Swan

message: I have placed templates on a number of sections of this article.  All of these sections have been contributed by User:Lucia73.  The templates relate specifically to a considerable lack of neutrality in those contributions (for more information please see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view}.
What is readily apparent is that the text of all of these sections is either 1. copied directly fron the web-site of the company Nautor's Swan or 2. to be a close paraphrase of the text from that site. My inclination is that all of this content should be removed.  There is also the possibility that copyright has been infringed even though, on the web-site of Nautor's Swan, there is no specific affirmation of such rights.Clrfr-2 (talk) 20:52, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The contributions of [[User:Lucia73]] to the article 

message: I have read the editiorial contributions of User:B. Fairbairn (made on 12 September 2009). I note that there are a considerable number of them (18) and that they were made over a significant length of time (a few minutes less than two hours).  I regard them as very good and helpful, and they seem to me to be a wholly appropriate and adequate response to the disputed POV.  I have, therefore, removed all templates relating to POV. I hope that User:Lucia73 will regard those contributions in the same way and will respect them. Thanks.Clrfr-2 (talk) 20:42, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resolution (hoped for) of this NPOV dispute 

message: I tried to clean up the article a bit, it had become a "prime" example of peacocking and POV. This is an encyclopedia, not a marketing site.Jeppiz (talk) 14:46, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleaning

message: This article is about Nautor AB, a company that both designs sailboats and has a line of sailboats, called "Swan". The title should be about the company. I propose moving to "Nautor" as the new title. As it is, it seems to be about a swan, belonging to a person, named "Nautor". HopsonRoad (talk) 18:16, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Absurd title: Move to "Nautor"
Talk:Kiwi International Air Lines

message: I knew that Kiwi ordered BAC One Elevens and after a brief search found a reference to back me up.  I've included.  Even in those days, the order was considered unusual. Archtrain 21:04, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: BAC One Elevens
Talk:Palić

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Psychonaut (talk) 16:16, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:Jevremovac

message: What is this "object" the article keeps referring to, and that apparently needed to be "legalized"? Can someone who knows what it is please copyedit the article so it makes sense?  Pinging PajaBG. Largoplazo (talk) 17:22, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi. I used the term "object" because initially no one knew what this is going to be in the end, and because it remained unfinished. Guess I can replace it with "edifice" or "building" in the first sentence. As the article says, "the legal permits weren't obtained", which makes the building illegal. As this is a common thing here, we have a legal process called "legalization". Basically, it makes illegal edifice legal after the fact - after the construction began or, in most cases, when it has been already finished. If in English some other term is used for this type of retroactive legal confirmation, I will replace "legalization" with it. I wasn't looking further, as Webster defined legalization as "to make legal; especially: to give legal validity", so I thought it fits the purpose. PajaBG (talk) 17:41, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The term "structure" seems suitable rather than "object". You might say "permitting" will be completed. AlthoughI don't believe I've ever seen a Wikipedia article about a building that mentioned a detail like the permitting process, and I wouldn't expect it in the absence of a noteworthy event, such as significant opposition to it or extraordinary barriers to obtaining it. Largoplazo (talk) 18:04, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  On a general note, if you'd live here, you'd know about obtaining all sorts of permits, corrupt and impotent administration, (il)legal shortcuts, after-the-fact and after-the-fact-after-the-fact corrupt processes which in the end lead to nothing :) One of the most luxurious hotels in Belgrade, Hyatt Regency, was opened in 1990, and I am not sure if it obtained technical acceptance certificate (literal translation - usage permit) by this day. Here, I mentioned it because present management claims that they have unfinished structure on the premises for 25 years cause they were unable to finish it due to the lack of permits. Well, now they got it. PajaBG (talk) 21:01, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Object