Talk:Tamerlane chess

message: *Anyone interested in aiding building a rules section complete with figures?  TheLateDentarthurdent 20:26, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Images and Rules

message: I replaced the diagram (Tamerlane chess jonadab .png) with one from my own because that one was erroneously a 11x11 diagram. Correct one for Tamerlane Chess should beCazaux (talk) 21:35, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diagram 

message: Either the article should be at "Tamerlane Chess" or the article should read "Tamerlane chess". Hyacinth (talk) 11:46, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: And either it's raining, or it's not. --IHTS (talk) 13:25, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Either one is a WikiFairy or not. Either Wikipedia should be improved or it should not. Hyacinth (talk) 21:35, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: My above remark clearly imparts that your tautological statement was unhelpful and not discussion or argument. Stop making this personal, you are being an annoyance! --IHTS (talk) 01:07, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Caps

message: There is a lot of confusion on that article and its diagrams (as on 2020/08/02). 
For each player, the Ferz is at King's left and the Wazir at King's right.
The Ferz (=General, Counsellor) is moving 1 space diagonally
The Wazir (=Vizier, Governor) is moving 1 space horizontally or vertically
Both text and diagrams should be corrected to be aligned with the sources.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cazaux (talk • contribs) 07:02, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusions with Ferz / Wazir  

message: Within Tamerlane chess are things known as "citadels". Does this warrant an appearance on Citadel (disambiguation)?
Okay. Let's get into this. In Wikipedia:Disambiguation, all the stuff I managed to comprehend basically said that disambiguation pages can only link to articles whose titles directly contain any given ambiguous name, but I've seen disambiguation pages that refer to sub-topics instead. Does that actually violate Wikipedia policy? I mean, probably not, but I'm unable to tell because it is so incredibly difficult to find what I'm looking for in that article. I would've just asked someone, but I genuinely do not know who could answer me.
I've just decided to post my thoughts here, since it means that I can just wait for someone more knowledgeable than me to help me out. ISaveNewspapers (talk) 08:32, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I see that in the disambiguation page Queen, there is an entry referring to the article on Carrom.  So if you were to do the analagous thing with Citadel (disambiguation) and Tamerlane chess, you wouldn't be the first.  As someone largely unacquainted with chess variants, I would not say one way or another as to whether this would be a helpful thing to add to that disambiguation page.  Bruce leverett (talk) 14:27, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citadel disambiguation page 

message: what about implementing more fairy pieces for camel, dabbaba, fers and vizer  instead of using up-side-down ones? SmartAlice (talk) 00:07, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Musketeer Chess Board Painting Tools do support a lot of icons to use for the camel, dabbaba, alfil and wazir. The ferz icon used in the article looks like a queen. Musketeer Chess Board Painting Tools can be used for an alternative to the queen icon for the ferz. 301fieriw (talk) 15:15, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  more fairy pieces