Talk:Demographic history of Kosovo

message: Interesting how you claim there were only Vlachs but Albanians only appeared, secondly there is no evidence of any Serbs in this territory until the 12th-13th century, we got countless of linguists that argue ancient names like Nish, Shtip, Shkup etc are from Albanian. It should be allowed to show an Albanian continuity instead of removing it because it doesn't suit your propaganda, the claim about Serbian scholars in the 11th century is nothing but speculation considering Serbs were definitely not the inhabitants of the region during that period and definitely should be removed. We got plenty of toponyms in the Nish area which shows an Albanian presence since the medieval period, We got in the Shkupi area Albanian presence since the medieval period etc. I wonder why do you keep removing this ? Not to mention Albanians were expelled from that same area in Nish. Secondly the so called Great migration of Serbs 1690 is just an invention, it was a war and affected all populations and there were movements from both sides, in and out. The name 'Dardania' is explained in the Albanian languages. Albanians are continiously mentioned in this territory since the Serb occupation and Ottoman occupation. The whole page is made up to make it seem as if Albanians just appeared but Vlachs are supposed to be the indigenous people by the  ... Albanians are mentioned right around the Serb occupation 12th-13th century and there are sources that show this... Also in the Llap region and even Nish-Toplica area where you find Albanian toponyms. Just write when these mentions occurred , don't write by the ...  TheCreatorOne (talk) 11:55, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interesting 

message: That whole 1690 is nothing but an invention from the Serbian part. For example the claim was that 30,000 - 40,000 families left when the patriarch actually said 30,000-40,000 people and many of these , if not most of them, had come from the Belgrade area, secondly later Serb writers interpreted that as 30,000-40,000 families and said all of them had come from Kosovo without any evidence. Not only this but they claimed they came from the towns which were in fact mostly Muslim Albanian. They claim there was a massive migration from an area that was Albanian even back then and Muslim. The claim isn't supported by the demographics. Only way one could support such an exodus was the areas of Eastern Kosovo which had a higher proportion of Slavs. And even that does not add up to 30,000-40,000 people (let alone families) considering majority of the refugees listed in Hungary were from what is today Serbia as noted by Malcolm. You also had refugees from other areas. Also persecutions occurred on all populations, especially Catholics, co-religionists of the Austrians. Where is supposedly the evidence on only persecutions of Serbs ? Also completely irrelevant that some tribes from Northern Albania were supposedly settled, these were very few, there were movements in general in a territory that had a large Albanian population. You are manipulating the facts to make it seem like there was a flight of Serbs and settlement of Albanians only. TheCreatorOne (talk) 01:21, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  1690 

message: Why did you remove it ? There is nothing that supports what you claim, nor any kind of mass exodus of Serbs out of this territory especially not in an area that was inhabited by Albanians, not only this, but the people who revolted were specefically Albanians .You claim that we should be neutral but what you are telling is nothing but some false version of history and a fairytale where Serbs are favored. You are a bunch of propagandists and it's obvious you are threatened by the truth https://global.oup.com/academic/product/rebels-believers-survivors-9780198857297
This essay examines both the historical facts concerning the migration of Serbs from Kosovo in 1690, and the claims made about that migration by subsequent historians—claims which, at their most extreme, suggested that hundreds of thousands of Serbs departed, with huge effects on the ethnic composition of the region. This essay demonstrates that there was no large-scale organized exodus of Serbs under the Serbian Orthodox Patriarch, Arsenije Crnojević: his departure from Kosovo in early 1690 was extremely hasty, and he had not, in any case, been leading organized resistance to the Ottomans. A large number of Serbs did move with the Patriarch to Hungarian territory later in that year; he himself gave their numbers as 30,000 or 40,000. But they had gathered, from many areas, in the Belgrade region, and only a small proportion were from Kosovo itself. One unsupported claim was made many years later, by a Serbian monk, that the Patriarch had brought 37,000 families to Hungary; and in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries many Serb writers interpreted that figure maximally, while also assuming that all those people had come from Kosovo. This essay analyses the ideological influences (operating primarily on Serbs within the Habsburg territories in the nineteenth century) that helped to shape that interpretation; it also criticizes excessive claims made by modern Albanian and Turkish historians.
As for tribes being settled, mainly few tribes settled in an area that was inhabited by Albanians. Many Serbs moved into this territory later. They came from Serbia, Montenegro from tribes such as Vasojevic etc. You pretty much remove the truth. I have never in my life seen more pathetic people than you. You removed this part too: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expulsion_of_the_Albanians,_1877%E2%80%931878 , That shows a continuity in the Nish area since the medieval period at least. 
In 1660 Çelebi went to Kosovo and referred to the central part of the region as Arnavud (آرناوود) and noted that in Vushtrri its inhabitants were speakers of Albanian or Turkish and few spoke Bosnian. The highlands around the Tetovo, Peja and Prizren areas Çelebi considered as being the "mountains of Arnavudluk". Çelebi referred to the "mountains of Peja" as being in Arnavudluk (آرناوودلق) and considered the Ibar river that converged in Mitrovica as forming Kosovo's border with Bosnia. He viewed the "Kılab" or Llapi river as having its source in Arnavudluk (Albania) and by extension the Sitnica as being part of that river. Çelebi also included the central mountains of Kosovo within Arnavudluk. 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evliya_%C3%87elebi 
What persecution of Serbs are you talking about ? The people that were persecuted were Muslims and Catholic Albanians that revolted. TheCreatorOne (talk) 03:58, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  You are telling nothing but a false version of history