lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Fuel (band)

message: Would someone please list a citation of the band forming in Atlanta, Georgia. All the info I've heard and read had pointed to the band originating out of Tennessee and moving to Pennsylvania. Darwin's Bulldog 15:32, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Origin

message: I added a band template... Scorpio1981 05:15, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes

message: I've done some work cleaning up the band's album pages. They're a bit of a mess and could use some additional information about the albums and songs themselves. I'll add more as I can, but any help on the actual albums (and not additional media sources with which a given song was/is used in) would be appreciated. Darwin's Bulldog 21:29, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Album pages

message: I removed the break up section until there are some hard facts that they actually broke up or Fuel releases this information. I did a internet search and saw nothing about Fuel breaking up or Toryn Green going into movie business. Mikesd (talk) 03:43, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible Break Up

message: No information about the Fuel 238 name anywhere on the page? Was this added by the record company to stop confusion with other bands called Fuel? Why "238"?
My copy of Sunburn is by Fuel 238 - my friend's is exactly the same, except their name is back to Fuel.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.201.220.10 (talk) 11:06, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  AKA 
Talk:Henry Frank

message: My article Henry Frank is listed under 'suspected hoax'.  It is true that Google is not kind to this gentleman; the only reference I could find was http://books.google.ca/books?ie=UTF-8&hl=en&vid=0oLc3rZQ8O3LK__-t1&id=OOFt0ejaMPIC&q=henry+l.+frank+butte&prev=http://books.google.ca/books%3Fq%3Dhenry%2Bl.%2Bfrank%2Bbutte&pgis=1  .  But the article on Henry Frank was not based on on-line information, but on research from the Butte-Silverbow Archives, primarily obituaries from contemporary newspaper articles.  These are easily verifiable.
:Oops, ok, sorry about that! A list of Butte mayors didn't list him — then again the list has a warning that it could be incomplete. I removed the hoax tag; sorry for being overly suspicious! Weregerbil 22:31, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I found a few little factlets about him. One thing though: is the "first legislature" certain? My understanding of the US political system is very shaky; but as far as I can figure Montana's first legislature convened in 1864 — making him a representative at the tender age of 13. Weregerbil 23:09, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Simple example of Azuma's inequality for coin flips

message: Where does the 8 come from?  Working from the definition on the page for Azuma's inequality, it seems like it should be \Pr[X_N > X_0+t] \leq \exp\left( \frac{-t^2}{2N}\right), which gives a much better bound.
--128.119.246.169 21:59, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

message: A single example is not enough of a base for an article. And the example would help iin the article on Azuma's inequality. Pro on merging the two articles. -- Zz 16:35, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Often a single example clearly is enough to be an article (but I'm not saying that's the case this time). Michael Hardy 18:34, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'm also for merging the two articles. Sullivan.t.j 02:40, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger
Talk:Social psychology/Archive 1

message: "Allport 1968, p. 3 [orig. 1954]" Found this in the article, but we need more info than that for a citation. Lucidish 18:01, 9 Jul 2004 (UTC)

message: Many people have added their own pieces of meat and vegetables to that dish (I even brought occasionnally my few grains of salt ;-)). The result is, in my opinion, a very good presentation of social psychology. I congratulate all of those who worked for it from the beginning until now. Hope it will be elected article of the year ;-) --Pgreenfinch 07:34, 17 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Very good job 

message: I've revised the past five edits or so because of their POV nature, are underinformative, have stylistic problems (extra spacing where none is required), and grammatically poor. I would also suggest the the anonymous editor that they do not eliminate full sections of text unless those sections are in and of themselves inaccurate. Lucidish 22:32, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent reversion 

message: Cultural appropriation has just been nominated on WP:IDRIVE. Public education and Flirting as well as Teenage pregnancy are also currently nominated on Wikipedia:This week's improvement drive and may be of interest to you.  If you are interested in contributing, please vote or comment here: This week's improvement drive--Fenice 09:23, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Improvement Drive

message: Over at Talk:Cult of personality there is quite a dscussion about what this really is and who it applies to (more specifically Castro, but also many others like, say, Washington). Anyone here know? Or know a good source? DirkvdM 10:32, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds like a Max Weber-ism to me. But OED says the first mention of it was in 1956 in a Canadian journal. I don't much trust that.  Might be good to check a sociology text. Lucidish 22:52, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personality cult 

message: Any mention or discussion of Hobbes would have to go in a "Historical background" section, which doesn't exist yet. It sounds like it might be a valuable addition. It doesn't belong in the introduction before the table of contents, however. -DoctorW 19:22, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Historical background
Talk:Kino (software)

message: Does anyone know where this software gets its name from? Any connection to the Russian word кино? Gokulmadhavan 22:04, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, some connection.  Kino is the german word for movie theater.  It's probably derived from "cinema". Snargle 23:34, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is also one of the more popular video editors for Linux. I have the impression that only Avidemux is more popular. I removed this, and added a source so the article looks better =) Xvani (talk) 14:09, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Differential (mathematics)

message: The very first sentence in the article says: "In mathematics, differential refers to infinitesimal differences ..."
This is deeply misleading. It gives support to every crank on the Internet who thinks there are infinitesimals in the real numbers. This article is just awful.
189.223.217.159 (talk) 19:30, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: There are no infinitesimals in the real numbers

message: I propose merging Differential (infinitesimal) into Differential (mathematics). The two articles discuss the same topic, from slightly different perspectives. I believe that there should be a lead of no more than three sentences, followed by Introduction, History and Approaches sections, and that both germs and linear maps should be retained as separate subsections of Approaches. --Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Username:Chatul (talk) 15:05, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I've created User:Chatul/Sandbox/Differential (Mathematics) as a first cut; most of the sections need to be filled in from the existing articles. I hope that the outline will be enough to evaluate the suggestion. If there is a consensus to proceed, I invite other editors to clean up my prose or add text to the sandbox. I'd also welcome guidance on the appropriate level of detail. --Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Username:Chatul (talk) 01:49, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

text: I think that I have all of the pieces in place, although there may be some rough edges. Does it look good to go? --Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Username:Chatul (talk) 16:24, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: In Differential (mathematics)#Differentials as germs of functions, I am considering replacing  with 
The ring ideal \mathcal{I}_p^2  is also an algebra ideal of \mathcal{I}_p, but the distinction is probably TMI.  --Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Username:Chatul (talk) 15:09, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested rewording for germs
Talk:Czech Airlines

message: Czech Airlines have new logo http://www.novinky.cz/ekonomika/ceske-aerolinie-maji-nove-logo_122693_k0a6s.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.71.211.66 (talk) 13:36, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for pointing it. -- lucasbfr talk 17:19, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New logo 

message: Hello,
Correct me if I'm wrong, but as Czechoslovakia was a single entity in 1930, shouldn't all flights within the entity be considered domestic?George Adam Horváth 06:17, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  First international flight: Prague to Bratislava?? 

message: http://www.csa.cz/en/news/news_tz_data/tz_03102007.htm
--NicolasLord 15:21, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  new airplanes
Talk:Slieau Freoaghane

message: Anyone have any idea how to pronounce this thing? --Mark J 22:10, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd guess something like , based on a passing aquaintance with Goidelic langauges, but this is guesswork. Curiously, Scottish Gaelic "fraoch" (evidently cognate) means heather, not whortleberry, although they are at least in the same family. --Stemonitis 18:42, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Doc Frankenstein

message: I disagree with the "news release" evaluation. As far as I can tell, the lede is a history of the publication, plus a couple of relevant statements from the creators; the plot summary is NPOV and free from puffery; and the Awards section is perfectly normal. 
The only problem I see is that, as noted, it needs a couple more citations in the lede, and certainly should have them for the plot summary. If you consider the plot summary itself improper, please address that directly.
Please  me to discuss. --Thnidu (talk) 22:36, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not promotional
Talk:Multnomah people

message: To add to this article:
1) The approximate population of Multnomah people
2) A photograph of a Multnomah person and/or Multnomah artwork
173.88.246.138 (talk) 04:46, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: To add to article

message: Why not add the origin/etymology of the name "Multnomah" to this article, since it's something anyone visiting this article might expect to find here? 76.190.213.189 (talk) 02:33, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin/etymology of the name "Multnomah"
Talk:Lacus Felicitatis

message: The added statement that 'The "Ina" crater was named after Ina Balin, an American actress from the 1960s and 70s.' is incorrect. The crater did not have an eponym. — RJH 22:16, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This NASA page claims the Osama crater was based on a Japanese male name. Do we have a citation that it was actually an arabic male name? Andjam 13:00, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Osama crater 

message: See Is the Moon Still Alive?. BlankVerse 09:52, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ina crater - recent speculation 

message: I suggest that because Ina is such a bizzare and unique feature on the moon that it get its own article.  I'd be happy to write it, but can anyone point me at how to remove the redirect to this page? Jstuby (talk) 17:52, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ina article
Talk:Pend d'Oreilles

message: I added a link to the Pend d%27Oreilles %28tribe%29, but maybe this should be a redirect instead?
76.178.179.251 14:35, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: My sources agree -- Kalispel is another name for the Pend d'Oreilles. Pfly (talk) 21:48, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pend d'Oreilles 

message: http://www.angelfire.com/id/newpubs/kalispel.html. This might help. Lots42 (talk) 08:52, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maybe helpful 

message: Thought I explained in the edit summary, but it appears not. I removed a bunch of text that was directly copied from copyrighted http://www.kalispeltribe.com/history/, and a couple external links to game websites. Pfly (talk) 19:04, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  removed copyrighted text 
Talk:List of tool manufacturers

message: Suggestion: Add company: Wiha Werkzeuge GmbH (https://www.wiha.com/de/de/impressum or https://www.wihatools.com/ for english
They design and manufacture well-established tools from multiple disiplines: https://www.wiha.com/de/de/werkzeuge/.
Worldneedsplastic (talk) 11:47, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Talk:Musqueam First Nation

message: Shouldn't this be Musqueam First Nation?Skookum1 22:14, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah it really should be 2001:569:74D9:AF00:C58:39F4:7493:3D07 (talk) 11:15, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: proper name/title

message: Hey, I just noticed that the entire name section was copied word-for-word from the cited text and it does appear that the cited text is under copyright. ᗞᗴᖇᑭᗅᒪᗴᖇᎢ (talk) 19:37, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagiarism
Talk:Chehalis tribe

message: NB Chehalis Indian Reservation should be a separate article, and also there should be a Chehalis Tribe article on government; or a pure Chehalis people article that's not about the tribe, i.e. the legal entity, but the culture/history.  See talkpages at the Indigenous peoples' project for more on why (or Talk:Kwakwaka'wakw, Talk:Tsmishian and others in neighbouring BC for starters on why and wherefore of this policy.Skookum1 04:04, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: separate article for Reservation
Talk:Klickitat people

message: I renamed this page from Klickitat tribe to Klickitat (tribe), to match the format of other articles in :Category:Native American tribes in Washington. This move required deleting a stuck redirect. --Seattle Skier (talk) 22:06, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename 
Talk:Association of American Lutheran Churches

message: Is this the same body as the [American Association of Lutheran Churches]], which was formed by congregations of the [American Lutheran Church]] that did not want to participate in the 1987 merger into the [ELCA]]? If so, this article is misnamed and there's already an article about the body under its correct name. If not, apologies. Ropcat 22:30, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Molala

message: Several sources I've seen that include Encyclopedia Britannica claim the Molalas were Sahaptin, thus my edit saying as such. On Cayuse-Molala Relatability by Bruce Rigsby disproved this particular notion by analyising the known lexicons of Molala and Cayuse (long thought by white scholars to be splits of an earlier language) and determined that the Molala are a part of the Pentiuan continuum. Voltaire's Vaquero (talk) 01:14, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Status as Sahaptin
Talk:Nlaka'pamux

message: As well as government/organization articles for the respective bands/group governments incl. the redlinked Nlaka'pamux Tribal Council.  Language page should probably be "Thompson language" instead of Nlaka'pamuxtsin or however it's to be written (see Talk:Skwxwu7mesh Uxwuimixw on related naming issues BC-wide.Skookum1 21:13, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Separate language page needed

message: Good God, is this an ugly mouthful of an opening snetence:
:The Nlaka'pamux or Nlakapamuk ( ; Salish ), also previously known as the Thompson, Thompson River Salish, Thompson Salish, Thompson River Indians or Thompson River people, and historically as the Klackarpun, Haukamaugh, Knife Indians and Couteau Indians, are an indigenous First Nations people of the Interior Salish language group in southern British Columbia.
Can we cut it down to
:The Nlaka'pamux or Nlakapamuk ( ; Salish ) are an indigenous First Nations people of the Interior Salish language group in southern British Columbia.
and shove the rest of it down further in the lead?  And isn't "indigenous" redundant to "First Nations"?  I mean, are there non-indigenous First Nations people of the Interior Salish language group in southern British Columbia? Curly Turkey ⚞¡gobble!⚟ 00:01, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening sentence 

message: I don't know much about the Nlaka'pamux (correction, I don't really know anything) but the flag that was added by @Danceswithlightning is kinda suspicious....  I can't find anything similar to it used on any official government website or...well anywhere else that didn't likely snag it from wikimedia. 68.170.146.194 (talk) 04:34, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flag??
Talk:Problem of other minds

message: I think the Soft Materialist view needs restating. While there's nothing technically wrong with it, it's written in high fluffy wording that's more difficult to follow than it needs to be. And it assumes the reader already has a good understanding of how the human eye works, when that has absolutely nothing to do with the subject of the page. Hamnox (talk) 04:56, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Wholeheartedly agreed, it's apparently sourceless claptrap and I don't see what it's doing here. Going to go ahead and remove it altogether. 81.216.137.55 (talk) 06:46, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled

message: What are the first two propositions? Should they appear?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.30.171.128 (talk) 05:50, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: See . --Chealer (talk) 22:37, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reductionist view 

message: Was going to remove the 3+ year old tag but see content still very poor, at this point deleting most of it should be considered to get a fresh start. 72.228.189.184 (talk) 15:48, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  tagging 

message: It has solipsism, but it lacks the opposite theory: that everything is conscious. It is in my opinion that acknowledging the conscious nature of fundamental particles explains the entirety of quantum physics.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.228.111.117 (talk) 14:36, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Theory 

message: Can you update the article or whatever it's called because it have not Been updated since 2016 and its probably a good time to update this artical 2600:1700:7C10:7390:A9C2:67DD:5A6B:94BC (talk) 20:02, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Probrom of other minds simplifyed 

message: Article currently reads in part However, it is often disregarded by most philosophers as outdated. Behavior is recognized to occur due to a number of processes within the brain quelling much of the debate on this problem.
No sources, and note the weaselly nature of often disregarded by most philosophers. It should probably just be removed. Andrewa (talk) 16:35, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Removed. Tollens (talk) 02:57, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  OR and maybe just plain POV
Talk:American Association of Lutheran Churches

message: There's another wikipedia article about a body called the Association of American Lutheran Churches, which sounds similar to the group discussed in this article (with the first two words being of the denomination's title being transposed). Could it be that the author of the other article simply got the name wrong, and ended up writing a duplicate article under the incorrect name? Could someone check this out? Thanks! Ropcat 22:32, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The following passage strikes me as too POV: The lack of theological rigor was apparent. The three strand approach could never work; it was schismatic at best and syncretism at worst. Some may have argued this, but since it's pretty clearly an opinion, the article should place those thoughts in someone else's mouth, and cite the source. Ropcat 22:01, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The questionable text was removed in August.  I've taken down the NPOV tag.  PKT 19:42, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV
Talk:Tønsberg Fortress

message: The claim that Tunsberg existed as a town in 871, is a romantic myth, debunked by modern historians and archeologists. The mentioning of Tunsberg in the saga of Harald the Fairhaired is by all probability a misunderstanding. The sagas were written several hundred years later, at a time when Tunsberg was a major town. At the time of the battle of Hafrsfjord — which was most probably a couple of decades later than the traditional dating at 872 — there was an important market place — known as Skiringssalr or Kaupangr (the latter word meaning "market place") — in Vestfold, south of the modern town Larvik. It's mentioned in contemporary sources, and recent archeological excavations has confirmed its importance. Tunsberg is mentioned for the first time in 1130, and no archeological material indicates a Viking Age town.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.74.11.88 (talk) 12:46, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Tunsberg in 871!
Talk:Kristiansten Fortress

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 14:48, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 
Talk:Gladys Zender

message: Please take note that Jorge Chavez airport was inaugurated in 1960. Therefore, Zender couldn't arrive at that airport in 1957. She arrived to Limatambo Airport. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 200.62.181.244 (talk • contribs) .
The sash says 1958, article says 1957. --kingboyk 03:21, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This has no citations whatsoever.
Crimson nite 21:17, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography 
Talk:Palouse people

message: The usual etymology for Palouse is that it's from la pelouse, meaning a grassland in French, this being the language of the bulk of the HBC and NWC employees who were the first European-connected outsiders to traverse the region (I use European connected because many HBC employees, though speaking French as a lingua franca within the company, were of aboriginal origin from the Prairies and beyond).  Is "Palus" just a "nativized" version of Palouse, or is there an actual Sahaptian etymology here.  If so, could someone also explain how it is that the French term for grassland is so darned close, and why it is that English (and French) speakers adopted the Palus name for this region?  It should be noted that the Cayuse, Nez Perce, Pend d'Oreille and many other tribes in the area were not known by their native names (in fact, the Cayuse name for the Cayuse people and language is AFAIK completely forgotten); likewise the Nootka, Kwakiutl, Bella Coola, Shuswap, Kootenai and more (here given in their English names).  So how was it that a native word for a native people became translated to a stretch of landscape?  Or is it, as not said clearly in the opening paragraph, that Palouse is another form of the same word, and originally meant the prairie area around these parts, and then became applied to the people who lived there?Skookum1 09:52, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Is Palus a Sahaptian word, or of French origin?
Talk:Plateau Penutian languages

message: Berman (1996) is mentioned in the article but is not in the bibliography.  The title of Berman (1996) is "The Position of Molala in Plateau Penutian" and it appeared in IJAL 62, pp. 1-30.  The article also says that "other researchers" have pointed out similarities between Plateau Penutian and Maiduan but it doesn't identify the researchers and there is no bibliographical reference.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.212.78.220 (talk) 23:27, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Bibliography Needs Improvement