lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of governors of Rhode Island

message: Country Party (Rhode Island) has a verification notice that's been up for ten years and from what I can see, there's still very little sourcing that the party was a thing? I've found very very few references to any kind of formalized "Country Party", and most link back to Wikipedia. Major sources list Fenner as:
* Dubin: No party noted until 1797, then Democratic-Republican
* Kallenbach: Anti-Federalist (makes sense)
* Glashan: "Coalition Ticket" in 1790, and then Anti-Federalist.
* Sobel: simply says that he was elected in 1790 in a coalition, him as AF, his lieutenant governor as Federalist. 
So, ... do we have any sourcing that says this existed as a distinct party, and/or was the coalition known formally as the "Country Party" in contemporary sources? --Golbez (talk) 14:32, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Country Party
Talk:PA postcode area

message: The infobox says that there are 77 postcode districts in this area, yet I count only 67 – no PA39/40, PA50-59, or PA79.
And there's no easy way of accessing the infobox to edit it, it seems...
Bluebird207 (talk) 19:22, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Postcode districts
Talk:List of historical Indian reservations in the United States

message: What's OTSA? - Peregrine Fisher (talk) 16:57, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It stands for "Oklahoma Tribal Statistical Area" where the the area used to be an Indian Reservation and now it isn't but the for the tribes in Oklahoma, those are then used as the Tribe's service areas.  In Oklahoma, officially there is only one Indian Reservation: Osage Indian Reservation.  In some ways it is like the Tribal Desiginated Statistical Areas (TDSAs), yet in other ways like the State Desiginated American Indian Statistical Areas (SDAISAs) but in other ways functions much like the State Desiginated American Indian Reservations (SDAIRs) and Federally Designated American Indian Reservations (IRs). Clear as mud? CJLippert (talk) 18:04, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's OTSA 

message: These really should be changed to state names for global readers. I'll start knocking it out.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 19:07, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  postal abbreviations hold no meaning outside of their country 

message: Is there any reason why the term "half-breed" should be used? Is it a historical artifact or linked to something significant?97.122.186.123 (talk) 15:06, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Indian and Half-breed Reservations and Reserves" Half-breed?
Talk:1 E3 s

message: I am adding a Mozart piano concerto -- I could have chosen many others by him or by Franz Josef Haydn -- on the ground that it is fairly typical in duration for a work in sonata form by Haydn or Mozart, whether a symphony, string quartet, or concerto. Because such works figure heavily in most collections of classical music and appear frequently in the repertory of the respective works due to their accessibility and excellence, and because a huge number of such works exist, I have selected one typical for its duration.     
Please do not add works of similar duration composed by either Mozart or Haydn. One is enough to illustrate the duration.--Paul from Michigan 03:52, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: Why is this talk page called redirected to Talk:1 E3 s? Why are games measured in minutes even mentioned in the article? Britmax (talk) 17:52, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Why indeed?
Talk:Washington Street Bridge (Brainerd, Minnesota)

message: Should this be called Washington Street Bridge (Brainerd, Minnesota)?  There are others, a couple of which already link to here.--Appraiser 00:54, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.  I don't know which bridges are notable, but there's at least one drawbridge in Bridgeport, Connecticut, which is old enough to plausibly be notable.  The bridge named "Washington Street" on the USGS GNIS is neither of them — it's one in West Virginia. --Closeapple (talk) 00:58, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename?
Talk:Clifton High School (New Jersey)

message: There is no evidence that David Null meets the notability standards set at WP:PROF for professors. The link provided does show he is on the faculty, but provides no information that would establish a claim of notability, nor does it establish a connection to Clifton High School (New Jersey). If you have reliable and verifiable sources that would demonstrate notability AND a connection to the school, they need to be added. Without the required sources, the information has to be removed per Wikipedia policy. Alansohn 21:55, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  David Null 
Talk:List of governors of Nebraska

message: The tables need to be improved (the one we have now is from 2005).
* Images
* Replace full colored cell with colorbox after image
* Combine life section with governor section (e.g. "John Smith  ")
MB298 (talk) 20:09, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I think List of Governors of Nevada has a pretty good table. MB298 (talk) 20:10, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  I improved the tables in the way you proposed. Of course, I agree with you - the 2005 style is quite outdated, and we need a new one (and not just in this article). I like how it looks now, but if you want to try and add Nevada-style table here, its totally fine by me... By the way - I'm currently adding images to all lists of US Governors which don't have the "Portrait" section in the table. I'd really appreciate your help if you are interested to dwell into it. Cheers! --Sundostund (talk) 23:37, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've done a few (WV, SD, Iowa, I think); but would be fine doing a few more. MB298 (talk) 01:01, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  Great to hear that! I think you did a great job so far (I've noticed that now more lists have the "Portrait" section than before)... Of course, I encourage you to continue with that. As for me, I'll continue with adding the "Portrait" section to lists whenever I have enough time for that, until every list have it. Cheers! --Sundostund (talk) 14:16, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tables 
Talk:List of governors of Nevada

message: There's a problem with this accompanying list. 1) Clifford A. Jones, who is shown as serving from 1951-55 under Gov. Charles H. Russell, also served from 1947-51 under Gov. Vail M. Pittman, who was elected to a full term in 1946 after succeeding to the office in 1945. 2) Rex Bell indeed died in office, but that was in 1962, while he was serving his second term as lieutenant governor, under Gov. Grant Sawyer. Maude Frazier served out the last few months of Bell's term, and then Paul Laxalt served a full term as lieutenant governor under Gov. Sawyer.
I can't figure out the process to alter the chart. Rontrigger (talk) 05:07, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: List of lieutenant governors
Talk:Motorways of Pakistan

message: Whoever keeps changing and vandalizing this article, please stop. This is a NATIONAL MOTORWAY article. Swat Motorway is not a national motorway, it belongs to KP. Also M10 is not Multan-Quetta. If you don't know what you're talking about, stop writing and changing things in this article. Idiot.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 39.34.189.241 (talk) 06:31, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Idiot who keeps changing the Motorways 

message: Karawood789 and Pakistan01, please stop adding false data or outdated data to this page.  Please do some research on nha.gov.pk/en/ before trying this again.  You are wasting a lot of your time and other people's time.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cricket Fan01 (talk • contribs) 20:11, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  False/outdated data 

message: Some random person has decided to take it upon himself to create a map out of thin air and start numbering motorways. Half the information on here is completely wrong. Swat Motorway is not numbered and Hazara Expressway is not even a motorway. It's absolutely ridiculous how badly this article misinforms the masses. Please lock the article and have respected senior Pakistani wiki editors clean this mess up. --2607:FEA8:A380:3173:B42C:CA92:8E21:4538 (talk) 15:50, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is a complete mess 
Talk:Combat in film

message: What is the point of this article? If every war film, every sci-fi shoot-em-up, every historical epic, every nationalist propaganda monstrosity includes a battle, do they all have to be listed here? If so, the article covers less than 1% of them. Merge? Redirect? Delete? Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:43, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Uncited, uncritical, undefined, ... 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Violence in film and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 3#Violence in film until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 11:39, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Violence in film" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Distraint

message: I added a definition. However, the article is centric to English law and the definition is from an American law dictionary. The article probably could be expanded to show references to distraint in American and other common law jurisdictions outside England. Famspear 14:30, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This is going to be abolished in England soon so somebody had better include the U.S. angle or the whole article will be recategorised under "Legal history".Cutler (talk) 15:03, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I added a section on distraint in the United States, where it has not yet been completely abolished.  Verkhovensky (talk) 00:27, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Definition added

message: How do you call "Distraint" if something is distrained from somewhere else? E.g. someone owns a car which is on his own property and the car is distrained?
138.246.7.9 (talk) 14:15, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Only from the distrainor's land?
Talk:Image-guided radiation therapy

message: EPID redirects to the "Electronic Portal Imaging" section of this page. That term also applies to Enhanced privacy ID which I just created, and the redirect page needs to be updated into a disambiguation page. However, this section did not follow convention and provide a linkback to the redirect page. Who can help me get that fixed, or point me to how to do it?
SomeIOTSecGuy (talk) 01:37, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: EPID Disambiguation needed
Talk:Maryland Electric Deregulation

message: Currently only discusses BGE as if deregulation only affected that utility, will need added discussion of Pepco & Delmarva & Allegheny Power. Also does not mention Senate Bill 1 passed during 2006 Special Session, as written implies 1999 legislation capped prices to 2007. Also, not sure if article at the beginning should have such a political bent since, e.g., all Republican members in the General Assembly voted for the 1999 legislation and it did not impact any politics then or for a few years (not mentioned in any political statements). Maybe better to focus on the political aspect since 2006, when it started playing an important part in the state elections (issue still ongoing).  Deanlaw (talk) 15:06, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Work In Progress

message: http://articles.baltimoresun.com/1999-04-01/news/9904010184_1_glendening-general-assembly-deregulation
Paris Glendenning was opposed but threatened with a veto.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.173.225.33 (talk) 20:56, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Text makes it seem as if Maryland Governor supported Bill 

message: There has been a tag on merging Maryland Electric Deregulation into the Electricity provider switching article since Nov. 2009. I vote against it as the Maryland article is state specific discussion with little to offer to the more generic article Electricity provider switching (although that one has a Texas flavor). Deanlaw (talk) 19:52, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merger of Maryland Electric Deregulation into Electricity provider switching article
Talk:On Thermonuclear War

message: I've read Herman Kahn's books On Thermonuclear War, On Escalation, and Thinking About the Unthinkable, and his testimony to the June 1959 Congressional Hearings on the "Biological and Environmental Effects of Nuclear War", and nowhere does NOT use the term "megadeath", which as far as I'm aware was invented by Stanley Kubrick in his 1964 film "Dr Strangelove". I've also read arm-waving apocryphal allegations made by recent "biographers" of Herman Kahn, which claim he used "megadeath" in the 1959 hearings (where they also misrepresent his excellent testimony entirely), which he clearly did not from the published testimony.  Can anyone cite any examples of Kahn's writings (including page numbers, or quotations of sentences) containing "megadeath"?Special:Contributions/82.21.58.162|82.21.58.162]] (talk) 21:22, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Megadeath was not a word used by Herman Kahn in "On Thermonuclear War" or other books and talks
Talk:Two-hit hypothesis

message: The following can be read in the beginning of the article: "It [the Knudsen hypothesis] was first proposed by Carl O. Nordling in 1953,[1][2] and later formulated by Alfred G. Knudson in 1971.[3]". 
I read the paper by Nordling ([1]) and while it discusses the number of mutations required in the genome to develop cancer, it does not as far as I can tell at all relate to the two-hit hypothesis formulated by Knudsen which discusses that a hit (mutation) was required to each allele of the same gene (RB) to cause cancer. I would argue the statement in the Wikipedia article above quoted is false. I can however not access [2].
1. Nordling C (1953). "A new theory on cancer-inducing mechanism". Br J Cancer. 7 (1): 68–72. doi:10.1038/bjc.1953.8. PMC 2007872. PMID 13051507. Archived from the original on 20 May 2007.
2. Marte B (2006-04-01). "Milestone 9: (1953) Two-hit hypothesis - It takes (at least) two to tango". Nature Milestones Cancer. Retrieved 2007-01-22.
3. Knudson A (1971). "Mutation and cancer: statistical study of retinoblastoma". Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 68 (4): 820–823. doi:10.1073/pnas.68.4.820. PMC 389051. PMID 5279523.
130.241.182.39 (talk) 14:15, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who formulated the hypothesis?
Talk:Length time bias

message: Having read the article, I understand the concept it is trying to convey, qualitatively at least. However, I am having a lot of trouble understanding the diagram - it is in no way self contained. One problem is that it does not mention false/true positive rates of the test (I assume 0,100, partially from the text in the click-trough image). Other than that, I dont get what it is trying to say. It seems to imply everyone has cancer, and you can survive or die. THis seems like a bit of a mixed-up idea. All the population members must die at some point, and it is the fact that if someone dies quicker, and you draw a vertical line through a set of horizontal time-intervals at a random point, you bias against those who have short lifespans. tl;dr : Diagram is confusing, needs replacing. 92.21.153.243 (talk) 10:39, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Lymphadenectomy

message: This second line "It is almost always performed as part of the surgical management of cancer" I found ambiguous because it could mean that it is almost always performed whenever someone has surgery for cancer or that when it is performed it is almost always as part of the surgical management of cancer.
Lieroll (talk) 16:42, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Ambiguity

message: I'm not so sure about, "When the sentinel node is free of tumor cells, this is highly predictive of freedom from metastasis in the entire lymphatic basin, thus leading to futility of a full node dissection." The last phrase, "...futility of a full node dissection" doesn't seem to have the correct implication. Futility implies a task whose end result is unattainable, i.e. it is futile to reach a 7 foot shelf when you are 5 feet tall. I'm not a medical person, but it seems more appropriate to say, "When the sentinel node is free of tumor cells, this is highly predictive of freedom from metastasis in the entire lymphatic basin, thus leading to contraindication of a full node dissection." That is, full node dissection is not medically indicated in the situation. Chriskalexander (talk) 18:28, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I've changed it to "thus allowing a full node dissection to be avoided". - Rod57 (talk) 12:32, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Futility

message: Medical abbreviations:C pipes complete lymph node dissection here but 'complete' is not mentioned, and not clear if it is the same as radical lymph node dissection. Possibly the same as 'full node dissection'? What is a 'formal node dissection' ? - Rod57 (talk) 11:39, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Complete/radical/formal LND

message: A history section could describe: when started, practices before sentinel node mapping, and recent developments. - Rod57 (talk) 11:36, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  History section would be useful 

message: described a randomised clinical trial that showed no benefit from systematic lymphadenectomy for advanced ovarian cancer. Could mention (if find other sources - maybe for other cancers ?) ? - Rod57 (talk) 12:02, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  May not be helpful for advanced ovarian cancer
Talk:The Story of a Recluse

message: There is some further information available about the TV version on the BBC Genome website:
https://genome.ch.bbc.co.uk/559c31878bf94254aa63e550c09738f1
Stewart Granger played Manton and Peter Capaldi was Jamie.  The whole thing was broadcast on Christmas Day 1987.2A00:23C6:1692:3D01:91DF:6BCC:30CB:6A27 (talk) 14:46, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some details
Talk:Hague Congress (1872)

message: I feel that this article sounds biased in the direction of anarchists. It needs to be less subjective. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.79.193.120 (talk • contribs) 17 October 2007‎
: This article is totally POV. It gives an exclusively anarchist interpretation and references only anarchist sources. It does not even refer to the actual Congress record and other extant documents. This article should be appropriately flagged or removed. Mrwhoohoo (talk) 19:24, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV issues and needed expansion 

message: As the above discussion indicates, the POV of this article is disputed. It mostly seems to use primary sources from those directly involved in the congress, which is a major issue. Neutral secondary sources (ie. preferably not a history of anarchism written by an anarchist) should be used instead.Mirkyton (talk) 06:11, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Please expand upon this topic. Especially how Engels and Marx got on top of Bakunin? Wazzanonymous (talk) 04:26, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV notice
Talk:David Crawford

message: At John Wollaston Anglican Community School Camillo WA, There is a Humanities teacher named David William Crawford and he is a very good teacher even though he hates Wikipedia because the Information on Wikipedia is not true and it can make you stupid! Mr David William Crawford was born on Friday October 29 1982! We All Love David William Crawford as our favourite Humanities Teacher and he can be lovely!
By His Favourite Humanities Student Taj Scott Year 8 194.223.64.40 (talk) 15:16, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mr David William Crawford Teaching
Talk:Peover Superior

message: Please change Neighborhood to Neighbourhood in reference to the ONS data 2A00:23C6:5183:3B01:E477:6E66:C4BD:5F85 (talk) 05:34, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. JH49S (talk) 06:12, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  De-americanise
Talk:Clonally transmissible cancer

message: I suggest this addition to clarify things.
"Parasitic cancers are distinct from cancers caused by infectious agents such as viruses and bacteria, which are more common, in that they are not caused by infectious agents but that they themselves are infectious."
Vmaldia (talk) 23:48, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested addition to first paragraph last line 

message: We are planning to rewrite and extend this page, and submit it as a Topic Page at PLOS Computational Biology. For detailed information about Topics Pages see: http://www.ploscompbiol.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pcbi.1002446. Please contact us if you have any objections or suggestions about the proposed article.
Mark Ziats and Owen Rennert (ziatsm@mail.nih.gov and rennerto@mail.nih.gov)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.180.21.66 (talk) 18:03, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: A draft of the rewrite is now available at http://compbiolwiki.plos.org/wiki/Clonally_transmissible_cancers . Comments and suggestions most welcome. -- Daniel Mietchen (talk)  14:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Obviously much better, but at the moment it is way under-referenced by WP:MEDRS standards (which indeed usually have more references than medical review articles).  But whole paras have no refs. Did you post a request for comments at the medical project talk? I can't really comment on the detail. Johnbod (talk) 17:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I left some further notes on the talk page of the draft. -- Daniel Mietchen (talk)  04:19, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  We are planning to rewrite and extend this page 

message: This may be important to this page: https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2030391:
:"Two cases of pediatric lung cancer (in 23-month-old and 6-year-old boys) resulting from mother-to-infant transmission of uterine cervical tumors were incidentally detected during routine next-generation sequencing of paired samples of tumor and normal tissue."
Steved424 (talk) 21:21, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vaginally transmitted cancer via childbirth 

message: Make me sure. 2409:4041:6EB7:B2A8:8B37:2843:30DE:76F0 (talk) 07:45, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  If human body to other human or animal transfer cancer virus cells.if possible? 

message: — Assignment last updated by MatthewBroadway (talk) 22:56, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Plagues and People

message: — Assignment last updated by Daniel Fafemi (talk) 16:12, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Developmental and Molecular Biology Spring 2024
Talk:Unity Christian High School (Hudsonville)

message: This is just one of at least 4 "Unity Christian High Schools" in the US.  There are at least 3 that have Wikipedia pages, so it could be good to have a differentiation page, or to relabel this one as specifying the institution in Michigan.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thegeniusboy05 (talk • contribs) 02:04, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Done Vycl1994 (talk) 19:44, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I am advocating for the banning of IP user 96.94.158.17 this IP is internal to the school the article is about, and is subject to vandalizing this page. RadioSaint (talk) 14:46, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  banning of specific IP