Talk:Soho

message: 'Gentrification', second paragraph.  The last sentence in this paragraph, regarding the survival of houses from a certain period, reads, 'Only No 10 and No 15 from this period survived to the 21st century'.  Does the sentence mean ' ... have survived' (i.e. are still there) or ' ... survived', (i.e. may no longer be there, perhaps demolished between 2000 and 2020?).  It is the former, having looked carefully at the pictures.  In addition, the use of 'to the 21st century' rather than 'into the 21st century' is again ambiguous for roughly the same reason. I propose therefore to correct the English.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.43.59.159 (talk) 13:23, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Ambiguity due to use of American English

message: Hello, not sure if this is the right place to ask this?
I have tried to add more up to date info to the Sex section as it appears woefully out of date (last comments related to 2003) but it has been deleted by someone twice... is this okay or if not please help!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.218.209.235 (talk) 11:45, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Am I doing something wrong? 

message: I don't mean to create trans-Atlantic tension, but shouldn't this article be moved to "Soho (London)" with "Soho" redirected to "Soho (disambiguation)"? Particularly in light of SoHo (Manhattan), which is a well-known neighborhood across the pond, as well as Soho, Hong Kong. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 22:26, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation 

message: We hope (talk) 21:30, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photomontage for article 

message: Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 19:58, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Steven Johnson quote (moved from article pending rephrasing) 

message: Hello all, I was just wondering if the cited area of 1 sq mile (2.5 sq kilometers) for Soho is accurate? A quick glance at Google maps shows that Soho is closer to a .5 mi x .5 mi square (.75 km x .75 km), which would give it an area closer to that of 1/4 of a sq mile or .6 sq km. Those are very rough calculations, but I think it's safe to say that Soho is nowhere near a square mile in area (just draw a mile-long line in Google Maps to see for yourself). That's assuming American miles and standard kilometers. There doesn't appear to be a citation for where this original calculation originated from.
AlphaCentauri900 (talk) 16:06, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geographic Area 

message: I've got a problem with the infobox size. It's too big and squashes the following map down to leave a large white space below the "Location" section. Can it be collapsed? Also, there are now two maps in the article, which seems excessive - can we pick one (or a better one as discussed in parallel on Talk:Mayfair and go with that? Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:07, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The problems you describe do not occur on my screen; however, on my screen your removal of the infobox causes a "large white space". We can't design pages for any one user. I've restored the status quo ante. And no, infoboxes should not be collapsed. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:30, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: If this was work I'd say "share your screen and I'll have a look". ;-) Anyway, if I remove the map from the "Location" section, the white space disappears. Also, do we need the "Neighbouring areas of London" to be where it is, can we shunt it to the bottom? And why can't we collapse infoboxes? Is that a technical reason, or something else? Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 20:34, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox size