lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Buell Kazee

message: This article is , in some places, nearly incomprehensible.   Who could/should rewrite it?Dlwarner (talk) 00:55, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You can.  This is a wiki.  Be bold.Alcuin (talk) 22:20, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What part of Kazee's work was actually country music and not folk music?  I realize Kazee is referred to in country music sources, but I don't see his discography or other work falling into the country genre. What am I missing? Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 14:53, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Country artist?
Talk:Elena Dan

message: { This is a recorded professional opera singer, now deceased, who has very little documentation on the web.--Christophergill (talk) 23:54, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: ::that;'s ok. print is every bit as good. Can you find a list of her recordings? DGG (talk) 00:58, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Basilius Besler

message: Why does the title Hortus Eystettensis in the first sentence link to the German Wikipedia? --79.76.113.14 (talk) 17:42, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Because there is as yet no English version. So I am inclined to follow the example of the German, and split this into a shorter biography, with a separate page for the Hortus.--Michael Goodyear (talk) 03:39, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hortus Eystettensis German link?
Talk:Shared resource

message: After the merge, there is no definition of the term "Network share". Does the term include a shared printer? Or only shared disk/folder/file? Mange01 (talk) 01:37, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Definition of Network share?

message: After the merge, the article is sometimes using the "Network share" term, sometimes "Shared disk/folder/file". We should be more consequent.
Google hit rate:
* "Shared folder" : 878 000 hits
* "Network share": 726 000 hits
* "Shared resource" + file: 412 000 hits
* "Shared file": 255 000 hits
* "Shared disk" 126 000 hits
I originally named the article "Shared resource", but I can accept renaming it to any of the above terms. Mange01 (talk) 01:40, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: On second thought, I think Network share is a better name. It is less vague and more common. Mange01 (talk) 12:30, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which term should we use? 

message: The article says: "Shared file and printer access is typically based on the client-server paradigm, rather than such models as peer-to-peer communication or onion routing."
Some books, for example Cisco academy literature, talk about both peer-to-peer disk sharing (i.e. non-centralized, where anyone makes part of their personal computer disk available to others) and client-server disk sharing (using one dedicated centralized server). 
I don't know how to combine these two views. Is one of them false? Mange01 (talk) 23:46, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer-to-peer disk sharing? 

message: A  template was added in May 2010 by user:Furlong23. Why? Since then these changes have been made. Is it sufficient?
A  template was added simultaneosly. It had three sources at that time. Now there are six sources (including two footnotes). Please add  to formulations that still need sources.
A  template was added in december 2010 by an anonymous user. I am not sure why, but I guess it referred to the last sentence about Windows home edition. I tried to clarify it, added a source and removed the template.  Mange01 (talk) 10:57, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: No answer in 3 months. Then I remove the templates myself. Mange01 (talk) 21:55, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Can we remove the templates?
Talk:National Széchényi Library

message: István is Count Ferenc Széchényi's son.(:hu:Széchényi Ferenc) --125.28.188.45 (talk) 01:04, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Prior content in this  duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.oszk.hu/en/history_of_the_library. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  MER-C 10:55, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Sea otter conservation

message: Attribution: This article was created with content spun out from Sea otter. Kla’quot (talk | contribs) 01:11, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: — Assignment last updated by Lcveletter (talk) 21:22, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Landscape Restoration
File talk:Waterboard3-small.jpg

message: The original artist clearly intended this picture to be distributed as widely as possible. It is disturbing, but necessary to educate those of us, myself included, who had no idea what waterboarding was until I just happened upon this image. note: I am new here. If this is not the correct place for this comment, please feel free to educate me. Janewry (talk) 20:05, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strong Keep Waterboard pic 

message: Why is the closed deletion discussion not linked here, as should have been done? Badagnani (talk) 19:18, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion discussion

message: I have removed the following from the fair use rationales presented on this page.  They are either false, or not are remotely relevant to any possible fair use claim.  ➪HiDrNick! 19:20, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I reverted you. Please stop. The proud moment nonsense was added by someone else, I didn't look where. The others are fine for information/consideration. Don't remove them again. Lawrence § t/e 19:21, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use non-rationales
Talk:1:18 scale diecast

message: I'd like to move this to 1:18 scale diecast replica or similar, to make room for a more general article about the scale, similar to the other scale articles, ie: 1:12 scale, 1:24 scale, 1:144 scale etc. Any objections? Siawase (talk) 14:17, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Since there have been no objections, I'm going ahead with the move. Siawase (talk) 14:37, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moving this 

message: Start of the third paragraph of the history section:
During the early 2000s the quality and accuracy of models improved dramatically and these problems were largely solved.
What problems were largely solved? Seems to be referring to a prior comment which isn't there.
rsgdodge (talk) 18:45, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification?
Talk:M3 Chertsey Bridge

message: If I'm not mistaken, the QE2 Bridge is part of the A282, rather than the M25 motorway.  The Dartford Crossing article details the reasoning behind this - so I won't.  It may be a continuing flow of M25 traffic, but is not a motorway per se.
Booglamay (talk) 01:16, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Four' crossings
Talk:Idna

message: For future expansion; James Finn, p 285ff, tells of the events  in 1855. Huldra (talk) 21:51, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Finn: Stirring times 
Talk:Treaty of Old Crossing

message: *I removed a long term tag that had a totally vague edit summary of "separated notes from citations, minor c/e, placed "weasel" tag at top".
*If someone wants a tag placed please give some information as to why such a tag was warranted. We do not currently have (that I am aware of) a Wikipedia clairvoyant editor that is involved in deciphering and discerning how to fix a tagged article out of the blue. Without one of the two it would be impossible for future edits to address unknown issues and facilitate tag removal. Otr500 (talk) 16:40, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maintenance tag removal 

message: There are serious WP:NPOV and WP:SYNTH problems in this article; I have cleaned up some of the mose extreme cases. See Wikipedia:No_original_research/Noticeboard#Treaty_of_Old_Crossing for more discussion. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 17:21, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Essay
Talk:Great Lakes Depression

message: I know that this article is still under construction, but I would like to add that my impression is that Khar us nuur and Khar nuur are also inside the Depression. In any case, they are big lakes, too. Also, my impression is that the depression might stretch into Govi-Altai and maybe even Bayankhongor (don't have my Avto zamyn atlas with me, otherwise I would implement these points myself).
There might be missing a zero to the size of the Depression, or in any case this site gives a larger site for the Uvs nuur basin alone, while this site seems to give yet another number, which however is still greater than 39.000 km².
While I am at it, the bit about seismic activity seems a bit questionable as well. The map at the top of this site seems to imply that northwestern Khövsgöl and the Govi-Altai are pretty active, and that much of the basin is actually rather inactive. For further reference, there is also a paper called "SEISMIC HAZARD ASSESSMENT OF MONGOLIA AND ULAANBAATAR" located at the same server and locatable by google, which seems to give similar results.
And finally, it would be nice to know the relevant pages of the books you are quoting from, but I guess you were about to add them anyway.
But it's definitely an article worth having. Keep it up. Yaan (talk) 01:31, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: P.S. another interesting link re. seismic activity might be http://www.seismo.ethz.ch/GSHAP/global/.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yaan (talk • contribs) 01:38, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Achit nuur seems rather peripheral, Uureg nuur is arguably not part of the basin. Khar nuur, Airag nuur, Dorgon nuur and Khar-us nuur (the big one in Khovd, not the small one near Olgii sum of Uvs aimag ;) ) definitely are, at least when you include Khyargas nuur. Yaan (talk) 10:16, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  lakes 
Talk:1985 CONCACAF Championship

message: The final round of CONCACAF Championship 1985 is composed by the second and third round of world cup qualifying as reported on RSSSF archive!!! Stanza13
You could talk here if you not agree to put only the second and third round as Championship...however you have to change the goalscorers table if you put only the final round...thanks... Stanza13 (talk) 15:51, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Guerrilla theatre

message: I support the merger. Iepeulas (talk) 01:53, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't support the merger on the basis that Guerilla theatre has a well documented and very specific set of aims, means and origins that is clearly differentiated from Guerilla communication. I intend to expand this article to include some of this. Sebbi (talk) 18:16, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger

message: http://www.diggers.org/guerrilla_theater.htm
This is a good article on the early history and development of Guerilla theatre, focusing particularly on the San Fransisco Mime Troup, the Diggers and the Yippies. I hope people find this useful.Sebbi (talk) 18:25, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Found a good article to work from
Template talk:Alejandro Sanz

message: n Spanish, titles like other text, the words must began with capital letter only if they are names or the first word (Real Academia Española: Ortografía 3.3.3.g; Diccionario Panhispánico de Dudas 4.17).
Example: El tren de los momentos it's OK. "El Tren de los Momentos", "El Tren De Los Momentos", etc. are wrong.
<DIV align="right">Eloy (talk) 01:55, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Titles
Talk:Regulation of acupuncture

message: According to http://mx.nccaom.org/StateLicensing.aspx which has links to all the relevant state government pages except a few where it's banned, 22 states require its certification (which there is a link to educational requirement of on the page) to practice acupuncture, 6 states ban acupuncture entirely. I did a quick read through of the remaining 23 states. They all require state acupuncturist licences, and mention either one or more of the following: state exam, accreditation by the nccaom or acaom, degrees in tcm or acupuncture, often with specified required amounts of science and practical education. An important point which should be made in the acupuncture wiki page is if you are in the US and you see someone who is practising acupuncture without a state acupuncturist license, they are breaking the law and probably don't have adequate education to be safely or effectively sticking needles into people or ensuring proper hygiene while doing so. Gudzwabofer (talk) 08:18, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Updated US regulation
Talk:Dacrymycetales

message: The article says that there is only one family in Dacrymycetes, which also implies that there is only one order. But there is yet another order since 2013 (and thus a second family), Unilacrymales, (with the single species Unilacryma unispora, formerly Platygloea unispora or Dacrymyces unisporus) circumscribed in Takashi Shirouzu, Dai Hirose, Franz Oberwinkler, Norihiro Shimomura, Nitaro Maekawa & Seiji Tokumasu, 2013, "Combined molecular and morphological data for improving phylogenetic hypothesis in Dacrymycetes", Mycologia, 105(5), pp. 1110-1125. Episcophagus (talk) 15:53, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outdated information
Talk:Symbolic power

message: This article is in need of some serious work. It's pure academic jargon and does not belong in an encyclopedia.Hwhitbread (talk) 02:07, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Give it time. We're working on dejargonising the theorist and this will come next, with expansion. In doing that, I'm finding separate articles/stubs explaining Bourdieu's jargon very helpful, making it easier to do quickly. Julia Rossi (talk) 02:22, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Jargonesque

message: This article should be titled 'Symbolic power', not 'violence'. Seligenstadt (talk) 20:36, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Robotics/Assessment

message: Hi
I have fixed the attention needed parameter that was previously missing from the assessment tag.
The details are the same: |attention=yes}} sets the bit on and adds it to :Category:Robotics_articles_needing_attention
Chaosdruid (talk) 05:01, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fixed the attention needed parameter 

message: Hi all
I have got as far as "P" in checking and updating the A-Z articles, but 221 of them are still unassessed and unclassified .
I have found a fairly high number of "Stubs" that were incorrectly labelled which I re-classed as "Start", although there were none that were deserving of a B class there were a few that were close. There were a couple of Start class that I have put to B class however.
One or two new GAs and FAs appeared, but these were mainly due to them not having a Robotics tag although within the scope of the project.
The next stage is to consider whether the classes are correct. Some I have put at C class (although the project does not use this classification normally) as they are needing only slight amounts of work to turn into B's - I will endeavour to make sure they have the "attention needed" parameter set to yes (now I have fixed it lol) to ensure they appear in the correct category for easy locating from the category page once work starts.
There are a disappointing amount of Top and High importance articles that are not at B class as well! Some work is needed on those but if anyone wishinng to help and unsure of the higher class categories, ie a novice editor, I would suggest is a good place to start.
Chaosdruid (talk) 02:42, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Robotics assessments update
Talk:The Truth About Cars

message: This web site is similar to a magazine and is not a blog or simple regurgitated web info.  It is equal to a Car & Driver, Motor Trend or Automobile Magazine.  Its strength has been enhanced by the inclusion of Brock Yates as a contributing editor.
It is equal to Car And Driver?  You seriously mean that? uʍop ǝpısdn‫‬‭‮‪‫‬‭‮҉ (talk) 23:26, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

message: I found that this article is frequently edited by an editor (or more) with conflict of interest and hope this can draw the attention of other editors/administrators.---North south 101 (talk) 23:52, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Strictly speaking you can't say on wiki that unless the editor has broadcast the link between his legal name and his IP on wiki. I think by doing so you are sailing close to the wind on WP:OUTING . Greglocock (talk) 03:48, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

text: Old news. Some kid has taken over.Greglocock (talk) 23:28, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editor(s) - COI 
Talk:Brattleboro Retreat

message: The retreat tower has a date (in the stone) of 1887, not 1934, making the anniversary story unlikely. The date is visible in this photo (zoom in): http://www.flickr.com/photos/amyboemig/3454448044/
Loxosceles (talk) 20:09, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Anyone have any more information on the Sucker Punch reference? I feel like some information would help and there should either be stuff added (at least something that mentions where the place is in the movie) or the tags removed. Cleanelephant (talk) 06:00, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I've revised the text and added a reference mentioning a sign in the movie identifying "Lenox House" as in Brattleboro. Folklore1 (talk) 17:06, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sucker Punch 

message: Doesn't this section read a little bit like an advertisement? What exactly is an "unblemished record"... there have been plenty of attempted suicides.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Punchysam (talk • contribs) 00:39, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Treatment methods
Talk:Cobra (programming language)

message: After seeing the "Notability" tag on the page, I have established notability by adding reliable, secondary sources:
* InfoWorld
* ZDNet UK
* MSDN Magazine
* Lang.NET Symposium 2008
and removed the tag.
ChuckEsterbrook (talk) 10:45, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, but I restored the notability tag. Whatever sources you added, the article says noty a single word why this language is notable. In particular, does anyone uses it besides its developers? Lorem Ip (talk) 15:48, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: I myself am not a Wikipedia expert, but is "Cobra (programming language from Cobra Language LLC)" an appropriate article name? I looked at the list of programming languages, and several other languages with the words "programming language" parenthesized have no info about the creator/company name in the article name itself. Besides, it takes up extra space when typing it and seems a bit like a sort of "showoff", I don't know the exact term, like a sort of commercialization. Should it be shortened to just "Cobra (programming language)"?
DZGuymed (talk) 23:35, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No. The qualifier is necessary to distinguish it from Cobra (programming language from Squeaky Duck) --Cybercobra (talk) 07:28, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Name Change
Talk:Kadokawa Future Publishing

message: Can someone help integrate Kadokawa's light novel imprint holdings into the article?
source: http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/news/2011-11-21/asahi/kadokawa-controlled-48-percent-of-light-novel-market
quote from ANN article: "In 2009, Kadokawa-owned imprints Dengeki Bunko, Fujimi Fantasia Bunko, Famitsu Bunko, and Kadokawa Sneaker Bunko controlled 26%, 10%, 7%, and 5% of the light novel market, respectively, for a total of 48%. Kadokawa just announced last month that it is acquiring Media Factory, whose MF Bunko J imprint held an additional 8% market share. According to Asahi, the combination of Kadokawa and Media Factory commands an even higher share of the male-oriented light novel segment — about 90%."
-AngusWOOF (talk) 19:48, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Light novel imprint holdings 

message: I cannot find any documents that state this, none of Hasbro's SEC filings mention Kadokawa that I've seen.
Please provide a source for this, thanks.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.99.101.146 (talk) 14:00, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed it.--十八 20:35, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  How is Hasbro a subsidiary of Kadokawa 

message: I've just made some edits to the page as Kadokawa Dwango's restructuring process is just one week away.
After June 1, the current Kadokawa Corporation will become Kadokawa Future Publishing.
Gibranalnn (talk) 16:24, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  One week before restructuring
Talk:Super Roots 5

message: Specifically, there is nothing citing this supposed "record label dispute" or even making it popularized that Super Roots 4 was skipped because of superstituion.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.200.215.5 (talk) 18:46, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: One Link in references is dead and the references do not add credibility to the article
Talk:West High School (Bakersfield, California)

message: Matthews Should be a noteable alumni as he is currently the Starting Running Back for Fresno St. and was an All-league selection at West high. But there is no page on him. I's kinda new to editing but if someone would start a page on him I could fill in a lot of information on him.--Steelersjoeyporter (talk) 19:31, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ryan Matthews 

message: I've moved the long-unreferenced list of notable alumni here. If/when listings can be verified with a reliable source, they can be added back into the article.  Deli nk (talk) 21:32, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've restored those entries where valid sources for attendance exist in the individual bios. I also did the same on a school in New Hampshire. Be advised that relying on sources for attendance in the individual bios is endorsed in the school article guidelines. If you have a problem with that,  I'd suggest starting a discussion at WT:WPSCH/AG. Please advise me of any other schools you've done this on recently and I'll be happy to re-vet the lists. Thanks.  John from Idegon (talk) 02:56, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: But the template that is used within this article, , specifically instructs the reader to remove names "that do not have independent reliable sources cited within this article" (emphasis mine).  My actions were entirely consistent with those instructions.  I'm not sure how to resolve the contradiction.  Also, I have re-removed the sentence "Favorite student is James. "MR. ARRETCHE"" which you restored to the article - it is clearly inappropriate content.  Deli nk (talk) 13:13, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable alumni
Talk:That's How You Know (Disney song)

message: Just Disney songs? There's a turn on the hill reminescent of The Sound of Music. MMetro (talk) 05:49, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 
Talk:Happy Working Song

message: Please take note of WP:SONG#LYRICS. Lyrics generally can't be legally included in Wikipedia. jhawkinson (talk) 06:17, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lyrics 