lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Abortion in Italy

message: ummm....is it just me or is the validity of this article questionable insofar that the newest statistics it reports are 13 years old (i.e. from 1999). The article is supposed to relate the current status of abortion in Italy, not a historical review of what once was.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.97.118.2 (talk) 01:59, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This section is full of unsourced figures, starting with the astounding claim that less then 1 % of Italian pregnancies end in abortion. --Hjordmån (talk) 05:58, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The number was altered twice   first to 993, then 1 abortion per 1000 live births. Later, someone adjusted 1 to 9.8 per 1000 births, below 1 percent. These edits could be in good faith, but if so they had crappy sources. Probably at the moment, it would be better to just throw out huge chunks of unsouced text. --Hjordmån (talk) 21:06, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I started making sense of it, I think the author(s) confused the abortion rate per 1,000 live births vs the abortion rate per 1,000 women in fertile age. I still think most of the statistics that I left unchanged make little to no sense. --Broc (talk) 12:39, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abortion rate 

message: This is not a sentence, but I also don't understand what point is supposed to be meant here:
"The Christian Democratic Party had governed Italy since 1948, together with the Italian Communist Party's interpretation of the importance of Catholicism for any analysis of the balance of forces."
??
Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:50, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does this mean?
Talk:List of municipalities in Turkey

message: List is created for the help to users whom dealing Turkish towns/cities' articles and related Templates. 
Source is www.yerelnet.org.tr. During my work, I aware that a few municipalities lost and a few records are not correct. I made some corrections. Web and mail data needs some additional work.
Regards.Must.T  C  17:05, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please source those corrections. Without any other sources, we should be listing here what we have on YerelNet, which should be quite up to date. An alternative might be listing the websites of the mayors which list the mayors as well, so we can use them as source. DenizTC 18:23, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: List of municipalities and Mayors

message: I think we should create a section for each province and do the following:
==Province name==
;District 1 wikilinked

;District 2 wikilinked

...
==Province 2 ==
...
This way it should be more useful, and also we can reduce the size greatly. We might do the table for each province instead of for each district. Any thoughts? DenizTC 17:35, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If you don't like this, I think we should reorder the columns, the first column should be province, then district, then municipality. DenizTC 17:39, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  rearrangement 

message: I checked several links to provinces and I think we need some improvements:
#The political affinities should be given in a forth column.(party, independent etc.)
#The statues of all municipalities are not equivalent: There are minor municipalities , district municipalities, intercity district municipalities (in metropolitan centers), province center municipalities and metropolitan center municipalities. This statue difference is not shown in the tables. It should either be shown in a separate column or as a color legend in the second column.  Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 09:58, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two suggestions 

message: I think the unreferenced tag in the article is irrevelant. There is no text in the article . It is only composed of links to 81 provinces in Turkey. In this respect it is very similar to "Index" articles which require no sources. I propose to clear the tag.  Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 13:08, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tag irrevelant
Talk:HMS Dryad

message: Would anyone here know if the original HMS Dryad (1795) was transferred/leased to the Hudson's Bay Company?  An HBC ship named the �Dryad waas the vessel sent north in 1833 to attempt to found a fur post on teh Stikine River (see Fort Stikine.....or would that have been a different vessel?Skookum1 (talk) 17:29, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: A different vessel almost certainly. The Royal Navy Dryad does not appear to leave service until 1860. Unless you have any reason for thinking that they are the same ship the HBC's Dryad was far more likely to have been a merchant ship. Benea (talk) 17:46, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, at some points the Royal Navy leased HBC ships (e.g. the Beaver) and I think it went the other way with the Plumper at one point...on HMS Dryad (1795) the last captain named is 1832 or so....I just wanted to check on this before starting Dryad (ship), and also am hoping to find what kind of ship that was, e.g. if maybe it should be Dryad (brigantine) or Dryad (bark), etc...Skookum1 (talk) 18:02, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps, however as far as I can tell HMS Dryad became a receiving ship at Portsmouth in 1832, and she remained in this role until 1860. As far as the navy goes it would be very unusual for her to be de-hulked and transferred just a year after her laying up for harbour service, and her departure from navy service does not appear on the records I have to hand. I'd be fairly confident when starting your new article that that only thing the two ships shared was their name, though I'll make a few more enquiries on your behalf. Benea (talk) 22:35, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll maybe start Dryad then, maybe I should dab it with (HBC ship) rather than just (ship)? i.e. to avoid any confusion....in the same source where I'd come across it again, btw, there's mention of four HBC ships biult especially for the Russian trade, i.e. supplying goods from the Columbia District to Russian America, which were 400 tons each, no names were given, this was after the Cadboro, Vancouver, Cowlitz and BEaver (and Dryad) were already in service.Skookum1 (talk) 00:00, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: HBC ship ''Dryad''??
Talk:Aarøsund

message: Also the largest population of gay Danish fishermen can be found in this village.
Could someone please find a source for this?
I just heard from a relative that this specific article is used at Danish Universities as an example as to why Wikipedia is NOT a reliable source of information.
130.225.243.101 17:07, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Gay Fishermen
Talk:HNLMS Karel Doorman (A833)

message: Added the commissioning date of HNLMS Karel Doorman. Grebbegoos (talk) 14:01, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Commissioning
Talk:HMS Eclipse

message: In Ripleys Believe It Or Not:
"The sailing ship "Eclipse" was struck by a meteor in mid Pacific. The masts were carried away, the vessel was abandoned with a loss of 3 lives. Lifeboats covered the 900 miles to Hawaii in 13 days."
THe picture is like a wooden ship with white sails, like a typical cliche ship of the 18/19th centuries.2602:306:C5F3:4090:4145:9208:1B63:7CF7 (talk) 06:48, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which one was hit by a meteor?
Talk:HMS Egmont

message: I read in the Lonely Planet guide that HMS Egmont was the naval name of Fort St Angelo in Malta from 1912 to 1933 when the fort became HMS St Angelo.
I found strange that a land fortress would be labeled HMS so I looked for references and found that HMS Achilles was used as a depot ship at Malta, so maybe the official name for the Malta HQ was HMS Egmont but business was actually carried from the Fort. Or maybe the official name for the fort was HMS Egmont.
Page 242 of Naval Review, 1962, includes a letter purporting to correct erroneous information about this but Google Books only offers fragments.
Can you confirm or deny?
--Error (talk) 02:34, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fort St Angelo
Talk:Jordan Belfort

message: Baltazar you will be rich listen you will be rich don’t give up! 2601:806:300:8F90:6C17:6BDA:D0EB:10EB (talk) 23:18, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rich 

message: Much of this article sources it's evidence from Jordan Belfort's autobiographical novel "The Wolf of Wallstreet" which has been factually proven to be an embellished and inaccurate depiction of events. Many claims Jordan Belfort makes in the book have been debunked, this article should be updated.  Hapticmonsoon (talk) 17:09, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: does anyone really care? a better addition to the article would be ages for when he started Stratton oakmont 193.42.0.104 (talk) 06:06, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unreliable Source 

message: It is interesting that no sources talk about Belfort's greatest deception -the idea that he was a "Wolf of Wall Street" back in the day, or that anyone on Wall Street knew much of anything about his little pump-and-dump shop on Long Island. This was a shallow fraud, requiring little in the way of financial sophistication, and was something that organized crime figures, with little knowledge of financial markets, were engaged in back in the 1990s. And while I would never waste any money on Belfort's book of lies and wild embellishments, I read the Amazon sample and there's no way Belfort wrote that himself. Jonathan f1 (talk) 21:31, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ongoing fraud
Talk:U.S. Route 2 in Washington

message: A disambig page says this highway is called the Cascade highway. I've never heard of this before this is not the case, then the reference should be deleted from at least 2 disambig pages (Cascade and Cascade Highway).
Also, I didn't see the mention of Stevens Pass Highway, a name commonly used from Snohomish to Leavenworth.
71.212.4.53 (talk) 14:22, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cascade Highway 

message: Please add this page to my new category, 02. Thank you in advance. HighwayTyper (talk) 18:40, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: As the article is semi-protected, I kindly ask that you defer the handling of such edit requests to editors who are able to edit the article in case some action is needed. --Kinu t/c 19:24, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

text: Given the deletion discussion about the similar :Category:Interstate Highways by State, I am hesitant to add this category at this time, until some sort of consensus about that one appears. While this seems like a discussion for another venue, I personally do not see the value of the category you have created, as it is seemingly redundant to and less useful than the similarly-named (and more properly-named, due to the casing) :Category:U.S. Highways by state. --Kinu t/c 19:18, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 27 December 2019
Talk:Radio Delmare

message: There's a potentially interesting article lurking in here somewhere. Delmare was part of a mini pirate boom in the late 1970s which also saw Radio Mi Amigo relaunched from the MV Magdalena and Radio Caroline launching its own Dutch service. Hopefully somebody with a lot more historical information on the period can give it a proper set of articles. And then write a book about it. Lee M 17:31, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Moon of Mutiny

message: I've got a 1st Edition with an intact dust jacket in good shape, but no digital camera or scanner... If I can manage to borrow a camera, can someone show me how to upload images into wiki? Thanks! FusionKnight 13:43, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Found suitable image on the web. Uploaded under fair use rationale. FusionKnight 18:40, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  1st Ed Cover 

message: Should we put this under the Jim Stanley Series, or the Winston Science Fiction series? I'm not sure if a "set" technically counts as a series... By the way, I'm thinking about creating an article for the Winston set as well... FusionKnight 18:44, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Series
Talk:Sarah Ward (politician)

message: sorry folks, i haven't edited anything correctly in the last 45 minutes. I thot i'd discovered that Tom Hardy's first wife was an industry professional, and that therefore she needed to be disambiguated from the Victorian-era politician. Oops! Dunno what i misread, but i can't find it now, and am muddying the history by requestmoving useless stuff. (I'm not sure there's any reason but an excess of caution to not do the deletes myself, but i'm tagging the for speedy deln instead.)--Jerzy•t 14:11 & :17, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
::   In case you haven't noticed, i'm obsessive-compulsive, at least on what counts here, i.e. the (written) verbal level. No doubt it's at least annoying for some WP colleagues, but the process here is IMO effective in protecting the articles, at least on the long run.   Here's what the above two talk contributions (saved at 14:11 and, actually, a few seconds into 14:18) were intended to communicate: I was overtired. I found that the existing bios on the two Victorian-era Sarah Wards were presented as calling for a primary topic (the politician), presumably (there being no relevant edit-summary, let alone a discussion) on the (false) assumption that the policy on titling of bios, where ambiguity exists is, so to speak,
::: "First up, [(literally, out of bed) gets to the closet first, and has the opportunity to selfishly be] best dressed" [(figuratively, treated as primary topic)].
:: So i let the titling convince me that the off-stage theatrical professional, SW, was a contemporary and colleague of Tom Hardy, and that they met thru their work in the same industry. Then i 
::: lost track of the fact that that assumption was based on an existing WP article, 
::: confused Sarah's married and maiden names (which each have a non-plosive first phoneme and "ard" as the rhyme of the first -- or only -- syll), and 
::: went searching for the off-WP Web evidence that i assumed i must have seen. 
:: Well!  (I guess i was more subtly confused than it felt like!) And i see no evidence of our contemporary, Sarah (nee Hardy) Ward meeting our notability criteria.--Jerzy•t 02:24, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, i was confused, but not as inexplicably as it for a while seemed. I'm not sure whether deleting or speedy-ing is really called for after all, but i'll sleep before trying to tease that out.... to everyone's benefit, and perhaps also our relief.--Jerzy•t 14:58, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abortive move
Template talk:Infobox Christian leader

message: Under Template:Infobox Christian leader#Template Data, it should be noted that setting the parameter Type will alter the colour of the heading. Colorboxes could be a useful way to illustrate this.
Current text:
Type of leader (Priest, Pope, Cardinal, Antipope, or Coptic Pope). If the leader is none of these, leave blank to default to Bishop. 
Suggested text:
Type of leader (Priest, Pope, Cardinal, Antipope, or Coptic Pope). If the leader is none of these, leave blank to default to Bishop. The heading background will change to , ,  and . OJH (talk) 15:10, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: According to the page's protection level you should be able to edit the page yourself. If you seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:01, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 31 May 2022 

message: Hello,
For the Eastern Catholic bishops(or Eparchs as they are called), they lead Eparchies and not Dioceses even though they serve the same function.  Can somebody add a parameter to the template which states that, eg. "| eparchy = ".  Thank You....
Roberto221 (talk) 08:25, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: *Support. I agree with this as well. There should be an alternative option for "diocese"/"eparchy", like with the "elected"/"appointed" parameter. The same goes for the Eastern Orthodox clergy as well. Governor Sheng (talk) 14:23, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

text: * Support - agree this is appropriate and worth implementing. — Archer1234 (t·c) 15:54, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

text: * Support. OJH (talk) 16:35, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  New parameter
Talk:Zimbabwe Broadcasting Corporation

message: The website mentioned in the article now just contains the message "HOSTING FOR THIS DOMAIN HAS EXPIRED ....".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.238.139.18 (talk) 16:22, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This message is a bit late, but it's definitely back up now! 92.27.214.225 (talk) 00:39, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Website no more
Wikipedia talk:Translation/Cap d'Antibes

message: Cap d'Antibes is just a aera of the city of Antibes. I had a look on the english version of Antibes's article, Cap d'Antibes is includ into, and it's look very good.
Véronique Pagnier 17:55, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is it really usefull ?
Talk:New Caledonia national cricket team

message: This is a good looking page, keep up the good work Max ╦╩ 18:17, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  nice page  
Talk:HMS Exmouth

message: I belive the 1854 Exmouth was not broken up in 1905, and is the same Exmouth as the one listed here as launched 1905. It became a accommodation and depot ship in Scapa Flow during WWII. It is visible in two photographs in ADM 116/5790 Case 10368: History of the Fleet Base - Scapa Flow 1937 - 1946. The 19th-century ship-of-the-line shape is still visible, although much modified. Fine Hid (talk) 14:56, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2007-10-04 Pro-pedophile activism

message: Regarding the arbitration case you were refering to, SqueakBox, I have been looking for it, but I couldn't find it. Could you give a link to it, so I know whats playing htere? Thanks! Martijn Hoekstra 19:53, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please refer to the arbcom directly as the case is not public, SqueakBox 19:56, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  arbitration 

message: The individual restoring the S*** comments clearly does not want the mediation to work and is thus being disruptive. The mediation can only go forward if the comments of banned suers are promptly removed from this and the project page, SqueakBox 16:02, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: So I will not partake in this mediation process, SqueakBox 16:13, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Disruption
Talk:Responsibility assignment matrix

message: The article on Responsibility assignment matrix cover the same ground as RACI matrix; so I would like to propose redirecting Responsibility assignment matrix to the appropriate section in this article. Greyskinnedboy (talk) 03:30, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: I'm looking for a process assignment categorization system that includes a role of "submitter" or "requestor" or somesuch.  I would prefer something that's compatible with a diagramming system like EPC or BPM.  The point of the goal is to have a complete end-to-end chain of responsibility and action, however none of the RACI variants seem to fit (except inasmuch as "Informed" would fit the submitter, but it's not very explicit) and I can't find any other similar system that fits.  I'm reticent to create an internally-used variant of my own, preferring to adhere to some sort of published standard.  Does anyone here have any suggestions?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jdray (talk • contribs) 20:40, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Submitter" or "Requestor" 

message: I have also seen RAIDE (Book definition to be found, possibly part of Kaplan's work)
In the definition I have seen RAIDE stands for
* Recommender
* Approver
* Informed (Consulted)
* Decider
* Executer
With the obvious definitions for each word
--193.35.250.234 (talk) 10:35, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  RAIDE 

message: I'm searching where and when this tool has been invented.
# The oldest Google book to mention it was in 1999.
# ITIL has integrated it as if it was a part of it (and ITIL talks about it).
# The Motorola Sig Sigma method did that too, and our images are categorized like that (but that's not into Six Sigma).
So, I'm not ready to create a history paragraph now. JackPotte (talk) 20:50, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  No history paragraph 

message: In the picture "Assigning people to facilities, there is a row "C04  Security Governance (draft)".  I think there is a problem in that this row does not have an "R" in it. This means that no one is actually tasked with actually doing this item.  This is a mistake in the content of the picture.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.89.84.88 (talk) 15:06, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, it does seem that "R" would be mandatory. It occurs to me that the image could be replaced by a wikitable – given that it's just a text grid – and corrected in the process. Unfortunately this isn't a good time for me to do this myself, but I'll leave this thought here for future reference ... – Wdchk (talk) 18:04, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mistake in the picture
Talk:2-Hydroxyglutaric aciduria

message: Hello.
I am a member of WikiProject Medicine, a Wikipedia wide project that maintains and improves articles that fall under the scope of medicine. Since your article is already under has our tag, I have now reassessed it to make sure if is in the right WikiProject. Upon reassessment of the article, I'd like to make a few points, as shown below:
*Assess article with class and importance factors
*Added genetics task force
*
Leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. I'm glad this article could fall within our scope, and I hope to see it grow large! Many thanks! Renaissancee (talk) 16:57, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Reassessment for [[WP:MED|WikiProject Medicine]]
Talk:3 hydroxyisobutyric aciduria

message: Hello.
I am a member of WikiProject Medicine, a Wikipedia wide project that maintains and improves articles that fall under the scope of medicine. Since your article is already under has our tag, I have now reassessed it to make sure if is in the right WikiProject. Upon reassessment of the article, I'd like to make a few points, as shown below:
*Assess article with class and importance factors
*Added genetics task force
*
Leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. I'm glad this article could fall within our scope, and I hope to see it grow large! Many thanks! Renaissancee (talk) 17:04, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Reassessment for [[WP:MED|WikiProject Medicine]]