lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Situated

message: Aren't all robots situated?  I'm not sure we need a "situated robotics" article seperate from this one. --Jaibe 10:34, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

message: All robots are situated, but not every situated agent is a robot (at least, that is an open debate in AI.)  If there are other meanings of situated, they should be added into this article, rather than having the content of this article removed.--Jaibe 15:57, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  explanation of revert 

message: Regarding the proposed merge with Artificial intelligence, situated approach:
* Oppose A glance at "What links here" shows usage outside the realm of AI of the notion of being situated, particularly in Embodied cognition, Cognitive linguistics, Situated ethics, and Good and evil. __ Just plain Bill (talk) 20:18, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge? 

message: I propose this page to refer to various terms - e.g. in computer science but also in social science. Consider the work by Donna Haraway on situated knowledge. --Ingmar.lippert (talk) 15:26, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Given that very different concepts of situatedness exist (at the least from computational and social sciences), I propose to change this page to a disambiguation page. So, I would add the tag  if there is no discussion in the next month.Ingmar.lippert (talk) 18:05, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  given that nobody reacted yet, I suggest as a first step to move this page to Situated (Computer Science) Ingmar.lippert (talk) 15:55, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: If you want to move a page, see WP:RM. In this case, we don't disambiguate article titles unnecessarily - we would have to have a second article that needs to be some variation of 'Situated_(XXXX).' And even then, if there are only one or two, appropriate use of a  template is probably better.  - MrOllie (talk) 16:17, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  thanks, I will implement a {{|For}} template. Please do check whether this implementation is correct. --Ingmar.lippert (talk) 11:58, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  too many related concepts
Talk:Maiden Voyage (Herbie Hancock album)

message: In the booklet of my Mayden Voyage CD I read 'recorded on May 17, 1965'. That contradicts the dates given in the article.--77.7.30.198 (talk) 10:23, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Not now it doesn't. TheScotch (talk) 05:52, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release/recording Date 

message: The original liner notes have a single sea-stuff introductory paragraph by Herbie Hancock followed by an extensive purple-prose work-out attributed to one Nora Kelly. It would be useful to know who this Nora Kelly is or was. Anyone have any idea? TheScotch (talk) 05:50, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Liner Notes 

message: Re: "...the musicians develop the concept through their use of space and almost tidal dynamics....":
What the hell are "tidal dynamics"? TheScotch (talk) 05:57, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Tidal Dynamics"
Talk:Sextant (album)

message: I'm not sure, but is this: "It was, and remains extremely complex," really relevant to the article? It seems to be unnecessary.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kuliwil (talk • contribs) 10:18, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Statement not appropiate for Wikipedia? 

message: Herbie moved to Columbia Records in mid-1973, and recorded Sextant,
https://www.herbiehancock.com/album/sextant/ HammerFilmFan (talk) 14:22, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  dates
Talk:Bizarre magic

message: Please update!  I can only fit so many names in my head in one sitting :-) If a page exists for them or if you are inclined to make one, please cross link  --FreedominThought 10:46, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Significant Artists" 

message: The phrase "Gospel magic for pagans" needs a reference since quotations assumes a cited source. Please add a cited reference or some kind of verification that provides credibility to this quote.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.140.22.43 (talk) 18:51, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Gospel magic for pagans" 

message: I removed a couple of links, one was broken and one was an ad site.FreedominThought (talk) 23:15, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "External Links" 

message: It's not clear how this article wants to spell magic. Thmazing (talk) 05:58, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Magic(k) 

message: I have been working with established Bizarre Magicians who are published creators and known public figures to make this more relevant. All edits I have made are researchable online with a simple Google search and a minimum of deep diving. However, deeper research would only additionally verify the edits. Please discuss or research before deleting. Contribute and not censor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vwjr (talk • contribs) 19:08, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Information MUST be supported by references to reliable sources, a person or company's own website is NOT a reliable source for their inclusion here. You also need to consider if an entry is notable - listings of names with no indication of notability are unacceptable. Saying edits are "researchable online with a simple Google search and a minimum of deep diving" is NOT acceptable in terms of referencing or establishing notability. DuncanHill (talk) 19:29, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

text: NONE of those links are reliable sources for Wikipedia. Again - you need to read and comply with WP:RS. Refusal to do so is likely to be seen as disruptive. DuncanHill (talk) 19:49, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  This Wiki
Talk:Max

message: The only people or characters who belong on this page are those whose name is actually 'Max'. People whose first or last names are variants of Maxwell or Maximilian (e.g. the German boxer Max Schmeling) should be listed on those respective pages instead. - Mcasey666 10:47, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proper name versus short form 

message: The majority of items are people in this list, so I have lowercased it. asenine say what? 20:33, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Lowercase

message: The senator from Montana is missing from the page. I'd add it but my account is too new. Detjens (talk) 16:59, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.  æronphonehome  19:29, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Max Baucus]]
Talk:Melissa (Mercyful Fate album)

message: I wouldn't call this album black metal... I know it is a big influence on many bands of the genre, but I wouldn't go so far as to classify this album so. TheEsb (talk) 20:32, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Black Metal? 

message: Where the fuck are the sources you cunt-fucks?
--138.253.185.103 (talk) 03:11, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: Someone needs to completely rewrite the section on Melissa.  It was written by a non-native English speaker, and it is way too informal to be a part of an encyclopedia.  It needs sources as well!!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.172.91.240 (talk) 23:33, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Melissa, the skull
Talk:In the Nightside Eclipse

message: I don't want to get into an edit war, but a quick look at the album notes or the band's website indicates that Tchort played bass and Faust played drums. I corrected this early last week and it's been reverted to just Samoth and Ihsahn again. This is incorrect.
From www.emperorhorde.com:
Title - In the Nightside Eclipse
CD/ LP/ PIC. DISC/ MC (Candlelight Records 1994) Recorded July 1993
Line-up - Samoth - guitar. Ihsahn - vocals, guitar, synth. Tchort - bass. Faust - drums.
Thanks. Thee darcy (talk) 16:58, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've also corrected the lyrics, studio & producer credits- according to the album liner notes it was recorded by "Pytten and the Emperors". Also, this album contains two tracks whose lyrics were written by Mortiis so I've decided to re-add him to the lyrics. I've also added Trym and Alver's appearance on the bonus tracks. Also, this album was recorded in July, not December- or according to the band, "the seventh fullmoon anno 1993".Thee darcy (talk) 21:29, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The ONLY recording Samoth played drums on was the 1992 demo, everything after that had Faust drumming until the Reverence EP, when Trym joined the band.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thee darcy (talk • contribs) 18:43, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Anyone who wants to say Samoth played drums on this record, please check the discussion on the Samoth entry or read this interview with Faust where he discusses the specifics of the kit he played while recording this album. Stop with the unsourced and highly suspect revisions. Samoth did not play drums on this album. Thee darcy (talk) 16:34, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Members appearing on this album
Talk:The Red in the Sky Is Ours

message: 2 stars, LOL... Yeah these guys are the authority on metal. 62.78.251.108 (talk) 14:25, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Professional ratings"
Talk:Rock The Boat (disambiguation)

message: Why does this redirect where it does?  I can imagine several other instances where this would mean or be interpreted as something else other than an album.  I, myself, came looking for information on the concept of "rocking the boat", that is upsetting the balance of things for little to no reason.  —  THOR  |    11:24, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  redirect location?
Talk:Organic Hallucinosis

message: According to this link there is also slipcase sleeve CD and vinyl version of Organic Hallucinosis with "Lunatic of Gods Creation" bonus track. I can't find any information about this release, so if you will find it, put it into the article. And Japanese version bonus tracks should be confirmed. Visor 15:01, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: probably an error as it was contained on the negation already (for which the track list is shown!) Spearhead 10:01, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Yet another release
Talk:Milperra massacre

message: Tone of article seems simplistic and poorly written.  It seems to belong on simple.wikipedia.  perhaps witten by a gang member?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.174.142.88 (talk) 04:31, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes: perhaps at least explain the term 'turf', which I'd label 'crimespeak'.2001:44B8:3102:BB00:751D:2A2:B6EF:A11 (talk) 00:05, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Tone of Article

message: Would pictures of the scene of the crime be good for this article. I am going to takes shots and add them in Adam (talk) 22:46, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Scene of crime

message: Please comment on an RfC to replace Template:Infobox Criminal organization with Template:Infobox Organization for active motorcycle clubs.  Thanks!  --Dbratland (talk) 20:39, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: RfC started to discuss replacing Criminal Org Infobox with Org Infobox

message: This stuff by Ms. Francis has no place in this article in any way. If you followed the link she gave as far as I did you'll know what I mean. This appears to me to be blatant use of Wikipedia as a Soapbox. See WP:NOT, WP:SOAP, NOT#OR, WP:NPOV etc. --220.101.28.25 (talk) 11:29, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: See diff to  - 220.101 \14:34, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of Section 

message: Supposedly the real reason for the bikie war that culminated in the shootout at Milperra:• Kent, Paul (April 15, 2009) "Caesar Campbell comes clean". The Daily Telegraph, Retrieved 4 April 2011 - 220.101 \14:34, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Related news article 

message: Why was it called a "massacre", as the article does not say? Apart from one innocent, the rest of those killed were armed, warring parties who specifically decided to fight and shoot one another. So sounds more like a feud than a massacre... Socrates2008 (Talk) 11:57, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: While in a strictly technical sense it wasn't a massacre, it is the term that seems to be most commonly used to describe the incident. A quick Google search seems to agree. You have to remember that in 1984 Australia, seven people being shot dead was mind-blowing (to use a not very encyclopaedic word!). It no doubt seemed like a massacre at the time (this was before Hoddle St, Strathfield, Queen St etc). Tigerman2005 (talk) 02:02, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Massacre

message: The article seems to promote the point of view of Colin Campbell. This is concerned taken with the lack of citations. It is also hard to understand how the thinking of Jock Ross on the day could be known given that he has brain damage — in any case, again, it has no source.--Jack Upland (talk) 10:09, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV
Talk:Balanced trade

message: I havnt heard of many economists arguing this.  Most understand that this is an impossibility as one country will be exporting and another will be importing.  (Gibby 11:43, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I say delete it!  (Gibby 11:44, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this really significant 

message: "Most understand that this is an impossiblity..."  Where does this "most" come from? 
Why is this article focused on just "...the surplus nation..."  Why cannot a deficit nation take action?  Why isn't the word tariff used?
This is not the best link but here is what one congressional condidate thinks the term balanced trade means.  http://www.jackdavis.org/new/speeches/balanced.asp
--JayR 14:39, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Impossible?

message: I've tagged this article for deletion, as it seems to be totally unimportrat. I've never heard a relivant reference to it and the article is uncited. Larklight (talk) 13:13, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Tagged for deletion

message: This concept is related to dealing the "new normal" unemployment situation.  Should be explored and expanded.Polecon (talk) 09:42, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Object to Deletion 

message: NPOV|VERY one-sided; unbalanced, reads like an "advocacy"-piece AND totally lacking in the basic content required of any serious article about economics-theory
as an economics & trade article, it's a glorified, wordy "stub"
Lx 121 (talk) 10:03, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  nnpov & desperately incomplete
Talk:Columbia Pictures

message: I want a role in hotel Transylvania 105.112.188.71 (talk) 12:37, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hotel Transylvania 

message: This appears to be malicious vandalism. The first clue is listing him as Joe Brandt's older brother. Further superficial research (the wikipedia page on Skouras, his obituaries, etc.) show no connection to Columbia in this or any other era; Skouras got his start running theaters, then moved to 20th Century before it merged with Fox. I've excised all references to him; if I'm wrong, then Cohn have mercy on my soul. RootlessIrishman (talk) 05:02, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spyros Skouras 

message: Hello, giant company and all the great crew who work for you, I would like to submit a request to you to give me an opportunity to act. I have loved cinema since my childhood, especially American cinema, which was and still is a part of my personality and will remain, knowing that I am a young man from Algeria. I am 26 years old and tall. I am tall and white in complexion. I have a talent for imitating voices and movie and cartoon characters. Thank God I have physical fitness, and perhaps other things that I need to train to master. I hope your esteemed honor will take my message into consideration. Thank you 41.98.136.92 (talk) 16:56, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Choice for me
Talk:TriStar Television

message: All of the TriStar Television logos are gone!  they have been replaced by the Sony Pictures Television logo now.  I doubt The Nanny and Mad About You on DVD has the 90s logo.  Lemme know about this.
King Shadeed 22:19, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  TriStar Television logos 

message: I've removed
:In 1998, the company used Global Entertainment Productions GmbH & Company Medien KG to identify itself after the merger of Columbia Pictures and TriStar Pictures.  This credit was also used on shows by Columbia Pictures Television and Columbia TriStar Television.
because it's not clear what relationship Global has with Columbia/TriStar/Sony. tregoweth 03:34, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Global Entertainment Productions
Talk:Barbican

message: 3 dead links under "See also". JFYI. --None-of-the-Above (talk) 20:34, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead links... 

message: Can someone add some information on the design principles?  What were these designed to protect against, how did they do so, and how was the design eventually attacked effectively enough that they became obsolete?  What replaced them?  ★NealMcB★ (talk) 22:20, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Design info? 
Talk:R-33 (missile)

message: Folks, I don't want to discuss historical things without proper sources at hands. I have listed the source used. I trust this source. The K-33 has had active radar homing while being under development. I know how Arkhangelski and Co work and I aint sure anyone else may have access to better sources than they do. If your "most sources" are like "Flight magazine" and "Jane's defense", please trust me. --jno 12:22, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, but i'm a russian. And not a novell writer. The text about its history is my traslation of quotes from the monography by Arkhangelski and Korovin. I've attempted to list the facts of R-33 development history. Am I wrong? If you can point me a good example or just state a ruleset, I may try to rewrite it. The only reason I was involved was my desire to clear some fiction from wikipedia. --jno 14:51, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

message: "It is the primary armament of the MiG-31 interceptor, intended to attack large high-speed targets such as the SR-71 Blackbird, the B-1 Lancer bomber, and the B-52 Stratofortress."
I suppose "intent" is the key word there, but I was not quite ready for that. Then again, there's not a single source in the opening or... well, the entire body of the article, for that matter. 76.89.33.204 (talk) 11:19, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: My Sides
Talk:Vow

message: I'm not sure how long ago this suggestion was made, as I've just stumbled across the article, and haven't examined the history, but the discussion doesn't seem to have been very lively! For what it's worth, I oppose a merge. I see "vow" and "oath" as being quite distinct, each significant enough to deserve its own article. AnnH ♫ 12:27, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestion to merge the article [[vow]] with the article [[oath]]

message: Oaths and vows are the same thing. Both articles need a lot of clean up. I am intending to merge and trim. -- Kendrick7talk 17:06, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose. Both articles need some TLC, but despite similarity, they are distinct topics. While they may overlap in concept, they approach and carry out that concept quite differantly. Oaths are a kind of promise to truthfulness in a particular matter. Vows are a solemn promise to action or to a lifestyle, especially religious vocations. Both are a promise, but of distinctly differant sorts. Vassyana 06:41, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: So an oath is a vow to speak the truth, while a vow is any promise of action generally? -- Kendrick7talk 23:46, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Correct. Oaths also relate to contracts, including oaths of service and association. Notably, even in these contexts, vows are still a seperate matter. For example, in orders of knights, one would swear an oath to serve/support/ally with the order (in essence, giving one's word on a contract), but behavioral/devotional promises (such as chasitity, poverty, et al) are still referred to distinctly as vows. Vassyana 00:50, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure I see the prima facie difference between an "oath of fealty" and a "vow of obediance" except that the person being sword to differs. -- Kendrick7talk 23:46, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reproposing merge

message: It is commonplace for the media to characterise politician statements as "vows", especially in headlines: e.g. "Minister vows to eliminate poverty."  Should this use of the word be ignored in this article, or should it explicitly be rejected, or should it be cited as another "new" meaning of the word "vow"? My personal preference is to reject it, but I guess that's a POV. CarlosChio (talk) 06:15, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: That sense of the word would belong in a dictionary, but not in this article, nor in Oath, as much as politicians may swear to do this and that...--Quisqualis (talk) 00:12, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contemporary use in media
Talk:Jolly Bus

message: Does anyone know the exact date of closure? 
More history about the Jolly family.
July 1995.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by TTTV (talk • contribs) 12:25, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your help. This is very interesting information, although I'm not sure how helpful it would be to the article without a little more historical detail. What we really need is some sort of publication that talks about it. This is probably asking a bit much, but do you know if you or someone in your family would know where we could find one? Alzarian16 (talk) 22:20, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Guaimura

message: I have attempted to clean-up, wikify (and verify) this article. I wasn't sure what to do about referencing the quoted passages as I wasn't sure where the original author had sourced these. I learned a bit about Bartolomé de Las Casas when doing this - so thanks to the original author of the article :-)
Politepunk 12:38, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Borussia Mönchengladbach

message: Why the "Borussia" in the name? Albatross2147 12:46, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is a Latinized form of Prussia and so quite popular among German clubs as part of a team name. If your root through the club list you'll see a few of Borussias. Wiggy! 12:57, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The city of Mönchengladbach is located in the Lower Rhine region of the Rhineland. As Rheinprovinz (Rhine Province) this once was a part of the State of Prussia. Today its northern part belongs to the German Bundesland (state) North Rhine-Westphalia, the southern part to Rhineland-Palatinate and Saarland (smaller parts to Hesse and Belgium). The name is quite popular among clubs from this region. -- Andreas Blenke (not a registered user) 91.17.198.201 (talk) 08:13, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Query

message: Keller's a free agent now... I'm taking his name off, while I don't know who's captain now. Bardiak 20:02, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kasey Keller 

message: Colud someone translate the german and/or the italian-version? --84.171.110.206 (talk) 20:24, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation 

message: As Borussia are in the Bundesliga next season, should the 1. Bundesliga template replace the 2. Bundesliga one now, or once the 2008/09 season starts? Lambdoid 18:21, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Now. Season start in terms of what teams belong to what league is usually considered July 1. I took the liberty of updating. Madcynic (talk) 18:26, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template:1. Bundesliga 

message: The redirect 2023–24 Borussia Mönchengladbach season has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Steel1943 (talk) 18:57, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:2023–24 Borussia Mönchengladbach season]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]