lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hemopexin

message: I was just wondering why "haemopexin" is the title of this article when it is referred to as hemopexin throughout the rest of the article.  I came upon this protein after finding it in a sample I was running in the lab and it was spelled hemopexin in the MASCOT database... so I recommend that the article be retitled "Hemopexin" as opposed to "Haemopexin" Kehrbykid (talk) 15:41, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: The name

message: Concering the lead sentence in Gene Wiki articles, as discussed here and here, we have tried to make clear that these articles are not only about the human gene/protein, but also orthologs that exist in other species.  The wording that was reached through consensus is perhaps a little awkward, but it is both accurate and concise:
:* <recommended UniProt name> is a protein that in humans is encoded by the <approved HUGO gene name> gene.
: The "that" in the above sentence is non-limiting implying that the protein (and gene) exists in other species besides human.
 is not only about hemopexin but a whole family of proteins containing the "hemopexin-like repeats".  Hence I think this article should be restricted to hemopexin (human + orthologs in other species) while an article entitled "hemopexin-like repeats" should be about the protein family, one member of which is hemopexin.  Boghog (talk) 17:44, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I went ahead and created an article entitled hemopexin family and split out material about the protein family into this newly created article. To have material about the protein and the protein family in the same article is confusing.  There should be a separate article on each topic. Boghog (talk) 19:44, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. Feel free to correct such things anywhere. Both articles should refer to each other in such cases.Biophys (talk) 16:50, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: On the other hand, this is not about the lead sentence. Consider Cytochrome c as an example in light of this. The article is about all cytochromes c. The ProteinBox article might be called Human cytochrome c or Mammalian cytochrome c. I would not insist on anything like this, however, for practical reasons.Biophys (talk) 17:45, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Justification for split
Talk:Heat shock response

message: At what temperature are Heat Shock Proteins activated in humans?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.226.72.29 (talk) 22:07, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: For my molecular genetics class, I improved this article and made a significant number of changes to more clearly explain heat shock on a molecular basis.Imossiah2016 (talk) 03:43, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your changes - they look good. Can I suggest that you try to explain the process as simply as possible in the first sentence though (WP:BEGIN)? Our articles should be understandable by relatively lay people and  is not particularly accessible. Thanks SmartSE (talk) 19:54, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

text: Oh and would you be able to reupload :File:Heat_Shock_Response_Pathway.tif as an .svg file instead of a .tiff? It's a much better file format for graphics (vector graphics vs. raster graphics). SmartSE (talk) 20:03, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Smartse, thank you for the tips to improve the article, I will work on that now.Imossiah2016 (talk) 22:02, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Smartse, I don't want to seem like I'm ignoring your advice but I tried to upload an svg file instead of the tiff for the picture but it didn't work. The image is not showing up, it's just a blank white space. I know the image is small but when it's clicked to be enlarged I think it looks clear so I will keep the image. Sorry for this. Imossiah2016 (talk) 23:22, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  No problem. It looks as if the file has just got the raster inside the vector file rather than writing the vectors directly. In Inkscape it's super easy to export svg but don't worry about it. SmartSE (talk) 23:57, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explanation of changes
Talk:WEMB

message: Requesting that vandalism be changed back.  WEMB is no longer in business, a former employee (Marky Billson) wants to claim he now owns it. Cyberland001 (talk) 03:27, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format.  — Ammarpad (talk) 11:20, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 15 November 2017
Talk:Pilin

message: Support 2019 proposal to merge Saf pilin N-terminal extension on the grounds that that subtopic is better discussed within the context of the broader subject. Klbrain (talk) 17:47, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 10:13, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: The two Pfam boxes currently have nothing to do with each other evolutionally or functionally, yet occur in the same article without much explanation. This article should either be filled with a big pilin classification system with many Pfam boxes, or be filled with a big pilin classification system that links to the articles for each individual Pfam box. --Artoria2e5 🌉 05:12, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split proposal
Talk:Holoprotein

message: In the Spanish and French articles, a Holoprotein is defined as an homogenous or simple protein whereas in the English version, it is defined as a conjugated, heterogenous protein which seems to be incorrect. --Royal Society Biologist (talk) 16:45, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction between Spanish, French and English articles 

message: — Assignment last updated by Paulowshki (talk) 20:42, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Biochemistry I
Talk:Hydrolyzed collagen

message: Seems to me like this would be better titled "hydrolyzed collagen." I'm not sure why anyone would look for it under the current name. Any objections to a move? - Inhumandecency (talk) 08:26, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to hydrolyzed collagen?  (from old title,"hydrolyzed collagen (hydrosylate)")

message: I think it's reasonable to have an article that defines hydrolyzed collagen and describes its uses. Even with the heavily-unsubstantiated claims that currently dominate the article, it still adds information, especially since HC has uses beyond supplementation (e.g., haircare). I strongly feel the page should be restored, though I won't revert it until others have weighed in.  Inhumandecency (talk) 23:39, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Why not write a new version of the article that actually cites reliable sources in a personal sandbox? Then there would be a better alternative than having to choose between either the appalling mess that the old article had degenerated into, or just having a redirect? Tim Vickers (talk) 20:44, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  page blanked; redirected to "bodybuilding supplement" 

message: Under the "Health Benefits" section there is a "Citation Needed" tag on the opening synopsis. I think the citation for that statement is adequately covered in the 4 subparagraphs. I recommend removal of the "Citation Needed" tag. Hannoske (talk) 17:33, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Health Benefits Citation 

message: I came to this page to find out what hydrolyzed collagen is, but no definition is provided. Chimodori (talk) 01:20, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is it? 

message: I changed the amino acids link to go to that article's table showing which are essential amino acids. I also added info about the missing essential amino acid. This was a cut and paste from the Gelatine#Medical_and_nutritional_properties article so if anyone thinks it's incorrect information then they ought to change it there as well as here. 
Incidentally, some percentages given in the amino acid table in this article are slightly different (1%) from those given in the gelatin article. Furthermore, why are proline and hydroxyproline put on the same line here? It seems to be implying that they are a variable mixture that makes up 25% of the amino acid profile. The gelatin article lists them separately at 12% each, making glycine, at 21%, the most prevalent. 
::92.25.15.35 (talk) 21:56, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amino acid and Nutrition sections 

message: Hydrolysed collagen is gelatin, gelatin is hydrolysed collagen. This is noted in the lead and there is no distinction. I think that this article should be merged into the other. Tomásdearg92 (talk) 06:47, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gelatin
Talk:Fire Sea

message: is the kleitus who killed the sartans in the chamber of the  Damned, the very first Kleitus? (Kleitus I). On scene where the attack was described, one of the sartans,soon to be killed, said "it's been rumoured that kletius is trying become the ruler". what do you think? --Fotte (talk) 14:04, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  One who killed the sartans in the Chamber of the Damned 

message: Hello everyone!
I wanted to let everyone know that as part of an undergraduate technical editing course, I will be working on editing this article. As of right now, my main goals are to adjust the tone of the information to make it more neutral and less like a review (this is what Wikipedia has the article flagged for) as well as to focus on restructuring the information in order improve its clarity and make it easier to follow. I will be posting my edit suggestions in my sandbox beforehand so we can discuss them! If anyone has any suggestions on what sort of improvements you think could be made to the article or external links that may help me as I make changes, they would be most appreciated, so please let me know!
Saraiediting (talk) 02:52, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing
Talk:Mycoprotein

message: This page is basically an advertorial for Quorn. I was hoping for more information about the ingredient and maybe some other uses/applications/processes. Is this possible, or is Quorn really the only mycoprotein brand?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.64.219.178 (talk) 18:05, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I removed the multiple issues tag. There were no problems noted on the talk page. Marilyn Wiebe, the author of the article cited in the article, has no obvious affiliation with Quorn, but a cursory Google search showed that she is clearly an expert on fungal biotechnology. If there are specific problems they should be noted here so a chemist (I am one) can improve the article. Godstar23 (talk) 22:04, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: American editors seem to be nuts about this. In the UK it's a completely uncontentious mainstream product, sold by all major supermarkets and widely eaten. I'm not a fan because it's tasteless, but it's never made me ill. It's been a vege staple for over 40 years. --Ef80 (talk) 18:28, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed multiple issues tag 

message: Recent major addition is somewhat essay-like and may need a rewrite to be compliant with the typical tone expected of an encyclopedic article. Alpha3031 (t • c) 12:12, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI tag (May 2024)
Talk:Endeavor Air

message: I have removed three incidents that are not notable and do not meet the WP:AIRLINES criteria. IP user has re-added, and I have removed them again. As I do not wish to remove them more than twice comments welcome. MilborneOne (talk) 18:54, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Accidents and incidents

message: Pinnacle Airlines Corp. adds very little other than the distinction of the parent from the flagship operating subsidiary.  The few relavent facts are seemingly already on the Pinnacle Airlines page (such as the headquarters location, Mesaba merger, etc.). Emjaymem (talk) 21:14, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Prestin

message: Perhaps this could be added to an existing section, or a new section created, to represent the 2010 information in the journal Current Biology, for "The hearing gene Prestin unites echolocating bats and whales", at 
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982209020570. Bob Enyart, Denver KGOV radio host  (talk) 14:09, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prestin sequence unites whales and bats
Talk:Protamine

message: doi:10.1111/jth.13405 - protamine administration increases risk of antibodies against the protamine-heparin complex and can result in a HIT-like state. JFW | T@lk 16:29, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  PHIT/HIT 

message: "Cite error: The named reference "refGRCh38Ensembl" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page)." - User:Boghog writes here that the template  "is meant to be used once and only once per article". Wakari07 (talk) 15:15, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I have moved the  boxes to newly created gene specific PRM1 and PRM2 pages and restored the  boxes with embedded links to the the new pages. Boghog (talk) 15:55, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:   and kudos for the expertise. Wakari07 (talk) 18:33, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error message 

message: This is just a note on why I've removed the Biegeleisen 2006 reference. The reference conflicts so significantly with the other proposed models (both for protamine and for DNA), as well as with experimental evidence, that I think it's reasonable to omit as a fringe position. The author of that theory has shown interest in forwarding fringe topics on some other pages. 
I think it's therefore sensible to be cautious about any re-addition of the following references without significant consensus:
*
*
*
T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk 08:56, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note about structure and fringe theories 

message: Suggest 154.182.14.196 (talk) 18:53, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Histon and protamine
Talk:Govanhill

message: Dude can you please add more pictures and tell us MORE about the COMMUNITY CENTRE!?!?!?!?!?!  
84.13.121.195 21:31, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures/detail 

message: Are we happy to include this article in the Slums in Europe category? Sure, it is a densely populated urban area, but is it fair to call it a slum? Edward (talk) 08:59, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it isn't fair to call it a slum... have removed the category. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 16:34, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slum category 

message: The area has undergone some degree of gentrification since the late 2010s. Should probably highlight this as the current article reads like the area is defined only by poverty. 2A0C:B381:50A:9D00:24FF:CD2B:C81F:CAED (talk) 20:59, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gentrification
Talk:Messier object

message: Someone would remember the amateur astronomer Edward Young from Bristol, UK by naming M100 in his honour after he passed away. 
In March 2014 the Messier 110 article was edited by adding the name Edward Young Star to the object which was not edited back for several months. That led to the name be listed on several Messier lists on the internet as the name of M110.
It has been changed several times since but every time edited back because there are no official list from scientific or other organisations or articles using the name.
So I remove it from this article for now untill it appears official in the Messier 110 article.
Agerskov (talk) 07:50, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edward Young Star is not an official name for M110 

message: No source has been given for this rather incongruous name. From what I can tell, M78 only seems to be known as "Casper the Friendly Ghost" among hobbyist astronomers; this name appears to have been popularised by Stellarium (software). Stellarium's source code gives the source for this name as "The 500 Best Deep Sky Objects' by Don Pensack", linking to this 2014 Cloudy Nights thread, with a list posted by Cloudy Nights user Stargeezer. The list itself does not provide any source of its own for the name, and the earliest mention of the name I could find using https://www.oldestsearch.com/ was from the same user in this earlier Cloudy Nights thread from 2010. As such, the evidence seems to suggest that the name originates with this Cloudy Nights user. I'm unsure what, if anything, would constitute a good source for this name - perhaps Stellarium's use of it is enough? Jan Sitelen (talk) 23:01, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed for now. Primefac (talk) 09:38, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Casper the Friendly Ghost Nebula" as name for M78 

message: The article gives 1967 as the year for M110 being added to the messier catalog, but the Encyclopedia Britannicia gives the date 1966. Icouldnotthinkofabettername (talk) 21:34, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Kenneth Glyn Jones, Messier's Nebulae & Star Clusters, (1st edition 1968), p. 16, lists 110 as being added (by Glyn Jones) in 1966. -- Elphion (talk) 00:00, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

text: Bibliographic info: Kenneth Glyn Jones, Messier's Nebulae & Star Clusters, 2nd edition, Cambridge University Press, 1991, p. 16, ISBN 0-521-37079-5.  First edition published in 1968. -- Elphion (talk) 00:10, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of M110 addition 

message: I just created redirects from common names of various Messier objects to their respective Wikipedia articles. The Wikipedia articles have also been updated to include those names. I have checked the common names on Google, and they all seem to be valid. Hypersolmeteor (talk) 09:21, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Common names added
Talk:Isopeptide bond

message: - I will add more images to make the article more engaging and to ease reader understanding
- I will make sure the naming/acronyms are well explained
- general revisions to improve the clarity of the article
- add some more paragraph structure to the article
- improve the headings 
- add a new section on other applications Interiorwater (talk) 22:34, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  improving clarity and reader engagement 

message: — Assignment last updated by RS UBC800 (talk) 21:14, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: CHEM 300

message: I have made some changes to reflect current research, improve reader experience and improve clarity. These changes include some important details on isopeptide bonds that were not mentioned before. 
Interiorwater (talk) 03:11, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  made edits to the introduction and the biosignalling section
Talk:Shute Park (Oregon)

message: I removed the data from the parameter accessdate= for lack of url.  NewsLibrary.com holds the archive of the The Oregonian before 1987 behind a paywall and I am unable to find a way to link direct to the search results.  I used THIS SEARCH and was able to get a results page with a preview image when searching a specific headline and date, but could not find a way to link to that results/preview page.  Darryl.P.Pike (talk) 01:19, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation accessdate removal
Talk:Ichinomiya, Aichi

message: By any chance is there a way to translate this table (according to this link)?: https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/一宮市#自治体の変遷 jlog3000 (talk) 15:47, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Municipal merger history translation
Talk:NtrC

message: This article should get a link to "nitrogen operons" or something, as NtrC is only one part of several more molecules here (i.e. NtrB, and also Sigmafactor-54 - I am unsure which article would best serve as the master link here, but NtrC alone is a little bit too small, thus IMHO a link to the larger article should be part of the current article). 84.112.136.52 (talk) 13:33, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Proteorhodopsin

message: This article has been flagged as being too technical, and requires a good dose of Plain English copyediting. Please see WP:EXPLAINLEAD for the approach needed to add clarity to the introductory paragraph of a technical article, whilst not losing content for more advanced readers. As it stands, it is unclear what the topic is about, requiring too many other wikilinks to be followed in order to make any sense of it.
I have tried too make a number of good-faith copy edits and spelling corrections, in the hope they will make it slightly easier to understand. But as someone with a good scientific and technical background, I still remain unsure whether these have helped or not, or indeed what the article is really trying to communicate. Hope this input helps make the article more informative. Parkywiki (talk) 23:43, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too technical
Talk:Deodatus of Nevers

message: The references and sources all seem to point to the same set of data, which is not encouraged by Wikipedia policy.  They should be culled out for importance, and only the best retained. Or, even, better, the external links should be replaced by references in scholarly books. --Vicedomino (talk) 08:09, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  References and sources 
Wikipedia talk:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject The Beatles/Policy

message: Consensus was created when Policy was changed to lowercase. All those involved in the discussion agreed that the case was proved. I, as arbiter (and original Capital T proponent and defender), and the lowercase proponents felt that English newspaper styleguides referenced had established current British English usage. If there was no dissenting opinion that was because people were not willing to participate, and it was properly advertised in the Newsletters (and I do not go seeking meatpuppets). That is their own lookout.
Only when policy changed was it challenged. The challenge was failing as the Capital T proponents (including me) were unable to provide any new and better authority for our position. Since consensus was not being formed to change the policy the amended policy should have stayed.
This doesn't mean that I really think that I should have voted to keep the policy. It is too decisive. However it does mean that if I really do ever find a "winner takes it all" authority for capitalising the letter t of the The in the Beatles then... tough shit! Either I was right to change policy or the fact of policy was wrong. LessHeard vanU 21:47, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The Following May Not Be Strictly NPOV

message: I came across this and realised that "No Policy" had been immediately interpreted as "We won. We can change anything we don't like because, well, we don't like it." Any one thinking like this is not going to be deterred by WP:OWN, WP:Point or Wikipedia:Not#Appeals to authority. This project needs policy more than ever. LessHeard vanU 09:48, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why I changed my vote 

message: I am disappointed that the discussion is closed after only a few editors provided input. Also, xaosflux closed it but his comments indicate almost no understanding of the issues involved (naming articles?).
On the other hand, this couldn't go on forever and the lack of participation indicates that most project members are willing to accept the status quo, or can't be bothered, so the outcome is probably appropriate.
The great majority of the articles in the scope of the project are in bad shape, and while there will be improvement over time, the lack of guidelines ensures that there will be little consistency within and across articles, continual flipping between "the" and "The", and extra work involved for conscientious editors who repair edits done by other editors who (A) don't recognize the conventions used by the majority of editors or (B) have personal agendas.
I see no reason to be a project member now; it doesn't mean anything. With some guidelines, and agreement to follow a process to create and maintain those guidelines, project membership would mean a willingness to participate in a group process. If there is no group process, members can do whatever they want, and there is no difference between members and non-members. — John Cardinal 15:38, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Closed