lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Tucumán amazon

message: This page was moved without going through the proper channels and should be moved back. Natureguy1980 (talk) 04:37, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Saint Lucia amazon

message: The Saint Lucia parrot is a species of parrot native to Saint Lucia and other parts of the Eastern Caribbean. Like most parrots, the Saint Lucia parrot is one of the richest parrots in the world. 181.188.23.35 (talk) 19:34, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Saint Lucia parrot 
Talk:Guadeloupe amazon

message: My Latin dictionary has viola "violet", or this book mentions violacea too. I don't have that bird book, only what I seen on google.  There was this source I used for Cortinarius violaceus too. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:43, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, can't see the first one, but though the second book is about mushrooms, the word is exactly the same (just another gender), so should be possible yo use it? Or will it be "synth"? FunkMonk (talk) 13:46, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  violacea 

message: Since this parrot was not even confirmed to be a real species, I argue it should be removed from the categories relating to extinction until a non-IUCN source confirms its existence. Riding on just one source isn't smart Ddum5347 (talk) 21:17, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The taxobox here itself is designed to follow the IUCN. Notice "status_system = IUCN3.1". And quit drive-by changing stuff to your personal liking without consensus, you are doing this in a lot of articles, and a lot of people are irked by it. FunkMonk (talk) 03:43, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

text: If its got an official IUCN designation, that's good enough for me. I agree with FunkMonk that Ddum's behaviour is problematic. Hemiauchenia (talk) 06:39, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

text: STOP your edit warring would ya? Everyone here agrees that this species exists, and bseides, a IUCN designation is enough to determine that it actually existed. JurassicClassic767 (talk | contribs) 07:48, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: In any case, the sentence that keeps being changed, "Rare by 1779, it appears to have become extinct by the end of the 18th century." is correct whether it was a distinct species or not, since no one doubts there was population of amazon parrots on the island that is now extinct.  Ddum5347's overall edits have been disruptive, and they need to be scrutinised. There was even a section devoted to their antics at the bird project: FunkMonk (talk) 08:30, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categories 
Talk:Dichelyne alatae

message: Is it symbiotic or is it a destructive parasite?Tourskin 20:24, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A symbiont can be destructive, neutral or helpful. A parasite is, by definition, a destructive symbiont. So, assuming it is a parasite, it must be destructive. Richard001 (talk) 07:00, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Feeding
Talk:Hispaniolan parakeet

message: I removed the following HTML comment tag from the article itself (seemed to imply a sense of ownership of the article?) but move it here so others know the origins of the article --
::This article was auto-generated by User:Polbot.::
- Ageekgal (talk) 08:59, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleaned up after bot
Talk:Notre Dame University College

message: Of course, NDU was never formally or informally placed "under the administration of the University of Victoria", although NDU's transcripts are physically stored there.  The phrase 'sounds nice' and adds a bit of prestige to NDU, which tends to appease alumni.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.136.184.240 (talk) 13:57, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Ultralight aircraft (United States)

message: What aircraft was used in Howard the Duck ?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=105x6633883  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.136.157.29 (talk) 16:41, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This isn’t really the place to find this kind of information.RJS001 (talk) 23:08, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see WP:NOTFORUM. - Ahunt (talk) 23:58, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Howard the duck
Talk:Animal Farm (video)

message: The film "Animal Farm" played in a porno theater (long ago demolished) located on Boylston St. in Boston, MA, USA for several months in the 1970's. The then-existing Massachusetts obscenity law was overturned by a court and by the time the state legislature had enacted a new one, "Animal Farm" was already playing. Thus it was protected by the provision in Article I, Section 9 of the US Constitution prohibiting ex post facto (i.e. retroactive) laws. Dick Kimball (talk) 14:47, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: I have removed the unreferenced tag as it is based on the British documentary, as is clearly stated at the bottom. Maikel (talk) 19:57, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Unreferenced removed

message: The redirect Animal Farm (video has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Utopes (talk / cont) 20:57, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Animal Farm (video]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Golden-winged parakeet

message: yea iam correctethe why peole the i would need food water and clothes  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.145.109.71 (talk) 20:09, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  the why peole the i would need food water and clothes
Talk:Brotogeris

message: Brotogeris pyrrhoptera has a wrong species for image, I can't change it. The image information is wrong, in the photo there's Orange winged amazon, Amazona amazonica, not Brotogeris pyrrhoptera. 2001:14BA:16DA:BA00:88C4:DB8B:AA95:9625 (talk) 13:48, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image with wrong information
Talk:Red lory

message: Why are two different names used? The oldest should be the correct one, no? FunkMonk (talk) 09:18, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scientific name
Talk:Forpus

message: There seems to be an issue with the taxobox - it says Forpus falls in the family Psittaculidae, but on all of the lists of genera and species in that family there is no mention of Forpus. Is that an issue with the taxobox or everything else? Are Forpus birds in Psittacidae or Psittaculidae? Audrey.m.horn (talk) 19:50, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Family Psittaculidae or Psittacidae?
Talk:Mexican parrotlet

message: in all the resources I can find, Forpus is placed in the family Psittacidae rather than Psittaculidae but the automatic species box places them in Psittaculidae. That's why I manually filled out taxoboxes, because the automatic ones are incorrect (look at the IOC bird list, which is stated in the WikiProject:Birds as the main source of taxonomic info). Audrey.m.horn (talk) 13:05, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: thanks for the catch. Its been fixed....the auto taxoboxes are usually in good shape...they are easily fixed if they are not... Pvmoutside (talk) 14:37, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: awesome thanks! I didn't know how to change the automatic things... Audrey.m.horn (talk) 18:19, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  family
Talk:Carrera Panamericana Mexico

message: :The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.  
I think this page is pretty thin on the ground, and recommend that it's merged with 'Carrera Panamericana', which a) is the correct name for the race and b) has rather more substance. However, that page lacks the information about the old race that this one has, and this one lacks the new race.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Josh.Sinyor (talk • contribs) 18:36, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge (2007)
Talk:Gal Vihara

message: Can this article :si:ගල් විහාරය be linked to this one on the English Wikipedia? I don't know the language. --173.56.251.165 (talk) 07:27, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Done, thanks. ≈ Chamal talk ¤ 07:33, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interwiki link to a Sinhala language language 

message: Start. TrangaBellam (talk) 14:46, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA issues
Talk:William Rutherford Mead

message: I have removed the list of notable buildings, because every one I could quickly verify turned out to be by McKim, or MMW as a firm. In fact, the source listed indicates that the buildings are MMW's, and they should not be listed under Mead's name. Indeed, the AIA Guide to NYC doesn't list a single building solely by Mead. Anyone considering building a new notable buildings list should provide an individual reference for each one, as any which are not supported by a citation from a reliable source should be removed. Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:08, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: List of notable buildings
Talk:Collared lory

message: The statement It is the only Fijian rainforest bird to adapt to urban landscapes and can be found in urban Suva. could use some citing. If only because I have seen Wattled Honeyeaters and Fiji Parrotfinches in downtown Nadi and many other species in slightly urbanised areas like villages. Sabine's Sunbird  talk 04:24, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: i'll fish out the exact reference tonight. i am not familar with fiji birds but with some books am happy we can improve in an area with very little online coverage. Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 04:42, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I definitely have issues with that statement, Vanikoro Flycatcher, Wattled Honeyeater, Fiji Woodswallow, Fiji Parrotfinch, Collared Kingfisher, Red Shining-Parrot were all seen in urban areas recently. Aviceda  talk 05:51, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Curious claim
Talk:White-bellied parrot

message: # As I did at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Birds#Parrot_move_suggestions_from_IOC_name_to_non-IOC_name. Consider this as a reiteration of my !vote there, if required. --Kurt Shaped Box (talk) 16:56, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Support

message: #Still oppose. To open a new vote at a different place seems to me a case of forum shopping just because the nominator does not like the earlier outcome. -- Kim van der Linde at venus 13:31, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Oppose
Talk:Tract 90

message: Is it just me or is this about the articles and not about the tract? Nickjost 20:02, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The tract IS about the articles, but yes the article is a mess. Why don't you be bold and fix what you can? -- SECisek 20:16, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

text: I have removed the summary of the 39 Articles.  Somebody should provide a summary of Tract 90 at some point.  Noel S McFerran 03:43, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Articles?
Talk:Maritime College of Forest Technology

message: Staff fail to spell student's names correct on diplomas and refuse to correct errors. 142.162.52.211 (talk) 14:46, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: If these statements are supported by reliable sources then they should be added to the article, being sure to conform to the policy on biographies of living persons. This is not a forum for complaints about the school. Nick Number (talk) 18:19, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unqualified staff
Talk:Dusky lory

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Dusky lory (Pseudeos fuscata), Gembira Loka Zoo, Yogyakarta, 2015-03-15 03.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on November 19, 2017. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2017-11-19. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:58, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Dusky lory (Pseudeos fuscata), Gembira Loka Zoo, Yogyakarta, 2015-03-15 03.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon
Talk:Edwards's fig parrot

message: Various names are used for this parrot on the internet.  The current name seems to have the most wiki links and redirects going to it.  It might be better English to use Edwards' Fig-parrot, but there are few links going there.  Sometimes Fig Parrot is used on the internet.  Snowman 20:09, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the best name for this page?
Talk:Elizabeth Neff Walker

message: Elizabeth "Neff" Walker (USA) is not Elizabeth Walker (UK) --Rumensz (talk) 10:15, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
Talk:Berks & Bucks Senior Cup

message: I notice that in the edit summaries a week or so back, Richard Rundle asked the question whether it'd be better to put the section for the 2008-09 results into it's on article. Certainly when next season comes around I assume that as it is currently this seasons results would get replaced by next seasons. Do other county cups have their own articles for individual seasons? If so then I'd say the Berks & Bucks should. Ben O'Bagels (talk) 13:03, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  2008-09 competition. Separate article? 

message: I've noticed from the last two seasons' draws that MK Dons have not entered in either competition. Does this mean that they have stopped competing altogether? If so we should update the article and state that they have stopped competing just like Reading have. Christophee (talk) 13:27, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  MK Dons
Talk:Rose-crowned parakeet

message: Moving this information from the article for future reference: [PDF]ALGUNAS NOTAS SOBRE EL PERICO CABEZA ROJA ... cires.org.ve/pdf/zoocriaderos-v1n1a06.pdf de HF AGUILAR - Citado por 4 - Artículos relacionados 30/4/1996 - El Perico Cabeza Roja Pyrrhura rhodocephala se encuentra distribuido en los Estados .... algunas notas sobre el cautiverio de la especie. Bogbumper (talk) 12:12, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
Talk:Final Fantasy II/Archive 2

message: This article has failed the GA largely because of lack of references.  All of sections one and two (with the exception of the story section, except if there are points made not directly about the story) need to be referenced, and on the whole, all the sections would benefit from interspersing some inlines into them.  As always, a peer review can help to flesh out more problems. DoomsDay349 01:19, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Failed GA

message: Hey everyone; I mentioned this on the project talkpage — think we can get this to GA status by March 20? I'll try to help out whenever I can. — Deckiller 03:15, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA by March 20

message: Bleh, I can't find a copy of the game script. Does anyone have one? — Deckiller 15:21, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Script

message: Although the article still needs a lot of work, it seems to be on GA level. Nominated. — Deckiller 15:52, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GANom

message: I got a little confused with that comment that said that if anyone was thinking of "spoiler", then everyone else would think the same. I do not understand why. I was thinking of adding "Do not add spoiler tags per story and plot consensus on WP:SPOILER. If you have any objections, discuss it at the talk page" instead of that comment. When a spoiler template is put either in the plot or story section, it is really redundant. Any comments? Greg Jones II (Sjones23) 18:08, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spoiler Warnings
Talk:Trichoglossus

message: There may be a better way of listing the taxa, both in the list and in the table, to indicate where the classification is uncertain. I was thinking about having two tables, one with just one entry for the Rainbow Lorikeet species complex and another for the Rainbow Lorikeet to include all the taxa where there is confusion above if they are a separate species or a subspecies. Snowman (talk) 09:51, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No harm in trying it out and seeing how it looks. Maias (talk) 04:05, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have amended it and two tables seems easier to understand. I have added an incomplete template, because it is more complicated, as some of the species/subspecies in the lower table are polytypic. Snowman (talk) 19:48, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uncertain classification
Talk:Flight nurse

message: Here is the policy statement from the AFROTC web site:
Information presented on the Air Force ROTC Recruiting website is considered public information and may be distributed or copied. Use of appropriate byline/photo/image credits is requested. 
http://www.afrotc.com/privacy.php 
Imikemeier 19:09, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: this article should probably be listed in brief on the nursing article, or renamed or redirected to a Medical Transport page that discusses the entire scope of the specialty since nurses are not the only medical practitioner involved in emergency air transport.
Roquen.phd (talk) 01:29, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree.  Flight Nurse is specifically transport nurses.  Paramedics, Respiratory Practitioners and Physicians involved in transport medicine certainly deserve their own articles as well as a meta-article covering transport as an overview.  | pulmonological talk • contribs  00:57, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: consolidation
Talk:Which Wich?

message: Locations section needs a major overhaul. More updated info and better formatting. I'll eventually get around to it unless someone else does first. --黒雲 user:Qaddosh 19:10, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Locations

message: There is now at elast one location in San Diego (in the Hillcrest neighborhood), so the lede it out-of-date. —SlamDiego←T 12:28, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need for up-date
Talk:Syrian Jacobite Church

message: Malankara orthodox church is not jacobite syrian church which is indipendented from syriac orthodox church.
== a
Avoid other editing ==
eldhose 08:49, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church is not part of the Syrian Jacobite Church. It is an independent Oriental Orthodox Church. So we do not have to list Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church here. But Syrian Jacobite Church can be Syriac Orthodox Church of Antioch or its Indian branch Jacobite Syrian Christian Church (which is also referred as Malankara Jacobite Syrian Orthodox Church). Hence this should be a disambig page , not a redirect. - --122.171.214.14 (talk) 16:55, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Obviously you guys know best how this page should go. Can anyone speculate on why Eldhorajan92 keeps trying to hijack the page? I'm going to try to get the page edit-protected. — Myk Streja [who?] 00:24, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
Talk:Ultramarine lorikeet

message: The illustration posted is seriously flawed - the colours do not in the least represent this bird. It is an old painting done from skins, probably deteriorated. The bird has no green coloration, but as the name indicates, ultramarine blue predominates. Surely a better picture can be sourced. Ptilinopus (talk) 01:44, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture
Template talk:User ro-1

message: Changed:
 Acest utilizator poate contribui cu un nivel de bază de română 
to: 
 Acest utilizator poate contribui în română la un nivel de bază.
I don't know whether this is better I changed ro-2 too, if you don't like it revert it. If you think is better change ro-3, ro-4, etc too. Thanks. -- AdrianTM 19:12, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:St. Vincent, Minnesota

message: I would like to come to an agreement regarding this page about my hometown, ST. VINCENT, MINNESOTA.
I notice that various users have repeatedly removed external links edits I have added.  I assume it is because it may be that to those persons, they do not qualify for a proper external link.
My hometown is a tiny village with few resources.  But it has a rich history.  The first link is actually maintained by a member of the town council and is only named as an 'unofficial' town site because the town itself cannot afford one.  But it is up to date with the current town leaders and a valid email in the contact link.  The second link is an ongoing history of the town that many persons researching local and family history have found invaluable.  Having it as a link on Wikipedia is valuable in ensuring those looking for such information will more easily find it.  
Trishymouse (talk) 04:08, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  RE:  External Links being deleted repeatedly 

message: In the geography section, when I clicked on the link  for "fur-trading outpost", it returned 404 - Page Not Found. Otr500 (talk) 19:58, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference
Talk:Ansorge's greenbul

message: Nothing found at Flickr. Richard001 (talk) 07:14, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo 
Talk:Marek Papała

message: Poland's chief of police is quite obviously notable per WP:BIO, politicians critieria #1 (nationwide office) and #2 (widespread media coverage).-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  19:31, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Currently, the article has no sources confirming either statement or that he was Police Chief of ALL Poland. Nuttah68 19:37, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Chose your favourite from . Currently I don't have time to expand the article.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  19:38, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: 'Articles that do not cite reliable published sources are likely to be deleted'. At the moment the article does not claim it is a national office. Nuttah68 19:41, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That we are missing an article on :pl:Komenda Główna Policji and related is no reason to delete the article, neither. I added some elinks, feel free to use them to expand the article.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  19:44, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Alexander Tatarsky

message: :A child who grows up among wolves becomes to some extent a wolf, and one who grows up among tasteless animated films becomes to some extent tasteless.
:  In one household I observed how a ten-year-old boy watched an irredeemable and endlessly dreary animated film produced by a lackluster local film studio.
:  "You like it?" I asked the boy, getting ready for a friendly critiquing of the film.
:  But the boy answered:
:  "Yes, I like it!"
:  "What for?" I asked, surprised.
:  "I like any cartoons!"
:  That momentous conversation took place long ago. The boy grew up but, as far as I know, has not yet learned to think.
143.231.249.141 (talk) 20:10, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes
Talk:Dawson, Minnesota

message: To whoever it is that keeps deleting the information about Dr. Virgi why don't you think that it's unimportant.  Can you please stop deleting the two sections about it until you can give a reason for it?  The information on Dr. Virji is definitely more important than some other things in the article, so why are you singling him out?  Please give a reason before deleting it another time, thank you.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cedar Tree (talk • contribs) 00:53, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dr. Ayaz Virji
Talk:Madison, Minnesota

message: l
Ll [[
Mongolia|mo]]p 2409:40C4:F3:16B9:8000:0:0:0 (talk) 06:55, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  L ol