lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Magic: The Gathering video games

message: This informative article was written whilst sipping Vodka and Grapefruit juice.
Aswan Jaguar doesn't cause the opponent to reveal his library. In a normal card game, it would; it would have to. But the Astral cards rely too much on the computer to make choices for them and were never intended to be used in a normal game. The Jaguar simply selects a creature type and then that's that; no shuffling, no revealing. 72.200.135.229 06:18, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is it important to contain information describing years abandoned, or shut down software? I do not mean stable code, like MSE, but things like MagMa, or Daring Apprentice. I think there are two options (aside from status quo):
# Remove mention entirely.
# Include paragraph briefly describing efflorescence of fan software, history of cease & desists, with mention of examples.
68.54.174.113 (talk) 14:52, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relevance
Talk:Dynamical friction

message: I think the whole section on Zwicky is invalid. As noted in the article, the effect of gravitational drag is generally to transfer momentum away from more massive bodies. Zwicky's proposal for a transfer of momentum away from photons seems particularly implausible.
In fact, the same year that Zwicky wrote his 1929 paper proposing gravitational drag as a way of obtaining cosmological redshift, an error in his analysis was pointed out by Arthur Stanley Eddington. Zwicky was quick in acknowledging the correction in a letter to Physical Review. 
*()
Zwicky did still continue to think that the method might be made to work, but as far as I know there has never been any analysis confirming gravitational drag on light over long distances in deep space, and because the relativistic mass of photons is so small the analogy that Zwicky attempted seems doomed to fail. Comments? —Duae Quartunciae (talk · cont) 05:49, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Followup. I have been WP:BOLD, and submitted some revised content for this section. I am still inviting comment, of course. —Duae Quartunciae (talk · cont) 06:15, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zwicky and drag on photons 

message: I have also rewritten the Chandrasehkar formula. Previously it had some bad formatting and mismatched brackets, and none of the variables were actually defined. I've added in the definitions, and formatted the functions Ln and erf using the LaTeX mbox form. The formula is basically from Binney and Tremaine, but I'd really appreciate someone double checking that I've described it all correctly. —Duae Quartunciae (talk · cont) 16:01, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chandrasehkar formula
Talk:Liberal Party of Australia

message: I don't understand why Liberal Party of Australia is listed Centre-Right rather than " Centre-Right to Right-Wing " just like Conservative Party of Canada and Conservative Party (UK) given the large influence from National Right? Mhaot (talk) 04:54, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Hey, this is a discussion that needs to be had, while I oppose your edit for bypassing the previous discussion above on this page where people were opposing the addition of right-wing to their political position, I will not be reverting it because you have sourced your changes (I personally at this time support the addition of right-wing to their political position based on leadership factors, however my opinion is utterly irrelevant, only the opinion of qualified journalists and political scientists matter for this subject, hence why we source them). I also note that the Conservative Party of Canada and the Conservative & Unionist Party are not relevant to this discussion, we must discuss and source only local political views for the Liberal party and should not be bound to modifying the Liberal's political positions to reflect that of other Commonwealth countries, after all we are our own independent nation with our own political system. Comfisofa (talk) 16:20, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Political Position 

message: Currently, the Liberals are ruled under a supermajority by their hard right factions, their leader, Peter Dutton, is the furthest right in decades, and he is arguably homophobic (opinion, but he rejects same-sex marriage). The party has also been reviewed by politicalcompass.org , one of the most credible websites for politics in this day and age. They put the Liberals at Far-Right authoritarian, but currently Australian politics are skewed to the left of the U.S.A and other Western nations, so it is best to call it Right-wing. 120.21.77.25 (talk) 10:12, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Just quickly chiming in to say politicalcompass.org is in no way reliable and has had some insane takes on the positioning of political parties over the years. — Czello (music) 10:35, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

text: See prev talk entries on this very topic J2m5 (talk) 10:39, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

text: I don't think Liberal is Far-Right, they aren't fascist nor racist. However, Dutton and the National Right have become the majority within the party, and the other factions are now very weak in comparison. I would be bias if it was allowed (talk) 12:19, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Liberals are now Right-wing  

message: Just below the info box a chart awkwardly separating two paragraphs has remained for quite a while now, unless i missed it, nobody seems to have brought up this glaring eyesore, so i figured i would
What should be done with it? i admit its a nice bit of information and explains things well, but surely there is a better way to go about it  Auspol4 (talk) 14:08, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is nobody going to address the out of place chart in the middle of the page
Talk:Post hoc ergo prompter hoc

message: Post hoc ergo prompter hoc -> Post hoc.  This is incorrect, it's post hoc ergo propter hoc.  RickK 21:06, Jun 17, 2004 (UTC)
*Correct, it's incorrect. :-) This common misspelling redirect was intentionally included to catch the user who has only heard the phrase or incorrectly remembers it, and enters it that way. --Gary D 21:09, 17 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: June 17
Talk:Weisswurstäquator

message: Shouldn't we at least hint at the fact that this is a humorous term? And shouldn't it be Weißwurst? <KF> 12:47, 11 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't care too much either way about the spelling - will leave it as it is for now- but you're probably right about the humor aspect - this will probably not be immediately apparent to non-native speakers :p I added a short note to that effect Ferkelparade 13:25, 11 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Latitudinarian

message: A note from the author: this article is intended to be more historical than anything.  The term "latitudinarian" is still used, but it has triumphed effectively to such a point that there is no longer a point in calling it a challenged movement.  Therefore, there is little discussion of who is a latitudinarian today.  That's why the historical development of the movement stops in the 19th century.  After that, discussions will be limited, probably, to individual divines who were against it, rather than on how the philosophy emerged. Geogre 13:14, 11 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I see the distinction you were making, and I certainly have no problem with it.  It does make the article clearer.  What is now bothering me is the number of contexts where 20th century historians use "latitudinarian" to mean, basically, "philosophical rather than religious" or "deist."  The problem, I think, comes from the Cambridge Platonists.  They weren't any one thing.  Some of them, like More, were quasi-semi-philosophical, and others were just what might be called semi-Pelagian.  The term evolves to mean "latitude" in church practice, but I'm worried that someone hitting the term in the Isaac Newton article won't understand that its meaning there is different from its meaning in an article on, say, George Eliot.  Geogre 09:51, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: :"For the 18th-century English church in the United States (which would become the Episcopal Church after the American Revolution), latitudinarianism was the only practical course since it was a nation with official pluralism"
:* Pluralism was only official in the US federally. At the state level, state religions continued both in law & in custom into the 1800s --JimWae 07:47, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, yes, but the point I was aiming for is that non-congregational churches, and in particular the Church of England in the US, that would have been the same thing: it was a national church -- a move from Church of England to Church of the United States -- and so it would have had the same bias.  Would you say that established religion was common in the states?  I see those states as very much the exception, as most were pluralist (particularly the mid-Atlantic and southern states).  Geogre 13:04, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  18th Cntry USA
Talk:Reform Party of Canada

message: Was the Reform party really pro free trade? I distinctively remember our local MP campaigning against NAFTA. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.94.176.150 (talk) 11:24, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Free trade

message: Why name this centre-right party Reform?
When I first learnt the word conservative it was that of somebody who opposes great change in society and yet reform sounds like the opposite to that. 
Surely the purpose of reform is to make a great change.49.3.72.79 (talk) 19:10, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: That was the name of the party. They can choose whatever name they wish. GoodDay (talk) 02:17, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

text: Their idea was to reform society from what they understood as a recently established "left-wing bias", so, to return to old, conservative ways. And the notion of this party was not only about conservatism, but also about Western Canada. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.144.245.25 (talk) 10:45, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why the name Reform? 

message: It should be mentioned that this party acted a a spoiler candidate against the more moderate PCP in the reality of the first-past-the-post system.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.144.245.25 (talk) 10:29, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spoiler
Talk:Mitch Hedberg

message: In her conversation with Mike Birbiglia, on his podcast "Working It Out", (03/06/2022) Mitch Hedberg's wife Lynn Shawcroft states unequivocally that Mitch did not have stagefright.  Ever.  Mike Birbiglia, who worked shows with Hedberg, agrees wholeheartedly.  
.
Shawcroft states that the notion that Hedberg had stagefright is a myth. TDCornwell (talk) 14:48, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: A volunteer in the Wikipedia Help suggesting I provide a link to the podcast episode and include the time where they discuss the "stage fright" controversy. I'm going to try that. Sarahnach (talk) 00:54, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stage Fright
Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers/Archive 7

message: Is it acceptable to do the following, especially in a table:
who it isAug 12, 1992
them is whoSep 7, 1999
It seems much more concise.....  (RayKiddy)
:You mean abbreviating months? It looks fine to me, but note that the software won't recognise it as a date, so it won't be rearranged to suit people's user preferences. -- Tim Starling 00:53, 29 Aug 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Month abbreviation

message: One article, 4510, doesn't follow the rule mentioned on this article. See Talk:4510 for what to do with it. 66.32.127.112 02:59, 22 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  4510
Talk:Prefix

message: Can anyone categorize the Greek numerical prefixes and Latin numerical prefixes?? No one has been focusing on any of the prefix articles lately. 66.245.117.3 15:03, 11 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: I couldn't find anywhere to put this when splitting the page, so here it is: Boogala boogala!
:A prefix of a string T = t_1 t_2 \dots t_n is a string P = p_1 p_2 \dots p_m such that t_1 \dots t_{m} = p_1 \dots p_{m}, where m \leq n.
T	=		B                  	a	n	a	n	a
 	 		Prefix means Prefix	 	 	 	 	
P	=		B                  	a	n	 	 	
æle ✆ 2006-03-28t02:18z 02:18, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved this to prefix (computer science), and restructured suffix in a similar manner -- Nils Grimsmo 16:16, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Computer science meaning 

message: I have undone the last edit of this page. The user replaced the first instance of the word "an" with "gay", a revision that is irrelevant and was probably a prank.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.8.51.93 (talk) 20:03, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  last revision 

message: I removed the links referring to more 'comprehensive' information that didn't really.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.50.40.127 (talk) 08:35, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed spammy links 

message: I undid some spam that was on this talk page, as it was very distracting to the real work/discussion I am about to do.
As part of a class, a group of mine is supposed to make significant revisions to a linguistics stub article. If you are watching this page and begin to see significant edits, that is the reason why! --Fjak (talk) 20:43, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Saving from stub status; spam 

message: First, the claim that all prefixes in English are bound morphemes is false.  The prefixes of up, self, and in of upgrade, unselfconscious, and influx are all independent words as well as prefixes.
Second, the analysis if the Latin negative in- is not followed by any linguist.  There are no separate i(g)-, il-, im-, or ir- prefixes.  These are assimilated variants of in- before roots beginning in gn-, l-, m/b/p-, and r-.  I am not good a charts, so I'll leave this comment here until I can work out how to merge the headings under in- while keeping the variations as examples. μηδείς (talk) 18:48, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  false bound morpheme claim and improper analysis of in- 

message: Corporate 2405:204:5685:F1DD:0:0:2864:20B0 (talk) 15:21, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prefixs 

message: Logic 2405:204:38A:D378:0:0:6D:B0AC (talk) 15:19, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logic
Talk:Aušrinė

message: I moved the page to Aušrine since apprently there is a problem with the "ė" in the article name - was displayed as AušrinÄ_ - Ferkelparade 15:09, 11 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:ITU Radio Regulations

message: From VfD:
A set of links and no article. Simoes
*Delete, Incorrectly listed by the above user on July 11th, no archive seen.  2 months later, the same concern still applies. -Vina 16:57, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)

message: You have to pay 252 CHF (Is that Chinese) to download the regulations. Please list them in this article, as I don't see how international radio regulations can be copyrighted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.244.197.255 (talk • contribs) 
:That is Swiss Francs - the ITU is in Geneva. I am not sure though you should have added the FCC article, that applies only to USA regulations and the ITU is international. Please also add new comments to the end of the talk page. Also please remember to sign yourself. Dsergeant 12:22, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The "free" document added by the anonymous editor is only a list of allocated frequencies, which is a tiny fraction of the complete Radio Regulations, hence I am removing it. A much more comprehensive manual of United States radio regulations is the Manual of Regulations and Procedures for Federal Radio Frequency Management (Redbook) which apparently contains the allocated frequencies as a single chapter. Should this manual be included as a link? Note that the ITU Radio regulations consist of four volumes, all red. During my search for a substitute I did find three useful links, which I am adding to the article. — Joe Kress 06:51, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  ITU Website Incompetence 

message: The latest ITU Radio Regulations is the 2016 edition, which is available for free download on ITU's website. Why the page isn't updated to reflect the new Regulations? -ArdiPras95 (talk) 00:57, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Latest Radio Regulations
Talk:Green Lake, Seattle

message: Green_Lake_%28Seattle%29 is a longer, more complete article than this one.  This should be merged into the larger page, or deleted.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.171.191.61 (talk) 16:51, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Duplicate Article

message: Woodlawn Ave. N.E.? Is this correct? I believe it should be Woodlawn Ave N.
: It is definitely Woodlawn Avenue N.E. Woodlawn is usually in the N. sector of Seattle, but when it jogs around Green Lake, it goes east of 1st Avenue N.E. and so becomes N.E. itself. The great majority of the blocks in which it is a neighborhood arterial are east of 1st. --Lukobe 19:02, 11 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Norman Thelwell

message: An extract of his work would be good, to illustrate his style
:I think we'd have to investigate the copyright implications. Thelwell's work is extremely well-known, and certainly subject to copyright restrictions. It 'may' be possible to obtain permission to use one of his drawings to illustrate an article about him, but I somehow doubt it....
:Agendum 17:19, 11 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Image Needed

message: Thelwell was also an accomplished watercolourist.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.188.147.225 (talk) 02:00, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  missing a section
Talk:Nursing care plan for tuberculosis

message: Why are we now redirecting to a POV screed on alternative medicine instead of to Health? Snowspinner 20:45, Mar 4, 2005 (UTC)
:Patient care is part of a nurses ..." Nurses provided Reiki, and Therapeutic touch services in hospices and elsewhere. 85% of nursing schools teach CAM.)
:And, of course, the reference to health and health again by a redirect from wellness is redundant. -- John Gohde 16:33, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Saint-Jean-Baptiste Society

message: Some of its leaders adopted extreme positions, declaring that the use of the English language should be banned completely in Quebec. Gilles Rheaume, a former president of the Saint-Jean-Baptiste Society, walked from Montreal to Quebec City where he urinated on the statue of British General James Wolfe, who defeated French General Louis-Joseph de Montcalm in the Battle of the Plains of Abraham in 1759. In 1998, former President, Guy Bouthillier suggested that the right to vote in Quebec should be conditional on passing a French-language test.
I'm moving this here for it to be discussed. This seems very much prone to give a slanted view of the Society, which has been known in the last few years for civilized intellectual and other diverse contributions, along with great gestures of openness towards all citizens of different heritage, for example, Jewish (Guy Bouthillier has made it a personal custom to defend the Jewish-Quebecois and to be present at their public events; something that was recognized by officials of the community) and black communities (the SSJB has pushed the plan of renaming a street of Montreal to honor the patriotic hero of Haiti, Toussaint L'Ouverture). In all respect, I believe the part cited above should be kept removed. --Liberlogos 17:24, 11 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, aside from the fact part of the information above is false (He didn't urinate on the statue, he marched and then begged his followers to say he did it), just because it's negative towards the society doesn't mean it should be removed. Habsfannova |t 05:08, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

message: It is true that the anecdote about the guy urinating on a statue of Wolfe is a bit biased and over the top and that the society has tried to become more inclusive of minority groups in Québec, however, there remains no question that it is an organization devouted to the protection of french culture and french nationalism in Québec.  The biased language should be eliminated, but the french nationalism espoused by the organization should not be minimized.
NJM
74.105.81.243 01:24, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The anecdote is over the top
Talk:TI

message: True or false: this dis-ambiguation page should be moved to either TI (disambiguation) or Ti and have TI re-direct to Texas Instruments. 66.32.253.1 18:00, 11 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Life is a bit more complicated than "true or false", you know. Anyway, the page is fine where it is; I've tidied it up a little more too. sjorford 13:45, 10 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Podujevo

message: Hello. Is there a special reason why you are removing the Serbian name of the city or is it just WP:IDL? — Ruach Chayim (talk) 18:29, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: im not removing it im just putting it where it belongs Fa7bardh (talk) 18:32, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

text: Podujeva, or Besiana (definite Albanian form: Podujevë or Besianë),Podujevo (Serbian Cyrillic: Подујево) see there is the serbian name of the city Fa7bardh (talk) 18:34, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The name of the article is "Podujevo", not "Podujeva". Thus, "Podujevo" will be in front of the second form of the name (see WP:STIPS). I'm afraid I'll be forced to report you if you continue with these non-constructive changes. — Ruach Chayim (talk) 18:38, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reason
Talk:19th-century philosophy

message: what is with that link?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.187.237.69 (talk) 17:57, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  blab school? 

message: " it validated strong emotion as an authentic not of aesthetic experience" -- is this supposedly English? "not of"? What does it mean? it validated strong emotion as an authentic (?authentic what?) (and) not (merely an) aesthetic experience perhaps? And what does THAT mean precisely?  Or maybe that it validated it as an authentic and aesthetic experience? I'd attempt to correct it myself, if I had an idea of what it was attempting to say.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.207.61.228 (talk) 15:04, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  cannot parse a sentence
Talk:State Historical Museum

message: Many states of the US and probably elsewhere also 
have "state historical museums", but they are usually prefixed with the state's name, plus for this one I couldn't find any evidence of usage other than "State Historical Museum" unmodified, so I decided it should "own" this article title, others should link via "(disambiguation)"-type page if necessary. Stan 18:16, 11 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled comment

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that :File:Museo Estatal de Historia, Moscú, Rusia, 2016-10-03, DD 49.jpg, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for October 2, 2023. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2023-10-02. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.9% of all FPs 18:13, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured picture scheduled for POTD
Talk:Gimmelwald

message: Things that need to be clarified:
:Is Gimmelwald in Switzerland?
"The population of Gimmelwald is 130, and there are 150 hotel beds for tourists."
:150 beds, or 150 rooms?
"Gimmelwald is reached from Stechelberg by the cable car LSMS."
:What is LSMS?
"The Kirchgemeinde covers the entire valley."
:What is a/the Kirchgemeinde?
Yes, Gimmelwald is in Switzerland. Its located in the Lauterbrunnen Valley which is south of the town of Lauterbrunnen which is south of Interlaken.
I don't have statistics to back it up, but I'd bet that the statement is correct in stating '150....beds'. (Gimmelwald is small. There may not be 150 rooms in the entire village.)
You missed it in the article. LSMS is the acronym for Luftseilbahn Stechelberg-Mürren-Schilthorn .
Kirchdemeinde in the German language means, roughly, 'church municipality'. 12.73.183.120 22:57, 25 July 2007 (UTC)