lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Lego Design byME

message: What does "close to the Digital Designer" mean? 
Would it be better to say "is developed from the Digital Designer" or "has used the Digital Designer to create sets"? I don't know if those things are true, so there has to be some sort of reference.Targetonmyback 07:17, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Dear All,
I believe there is a bit of confusion going on with sets belonging to the Exclusives range of products and the Design By ME. The listed products under the "List of Sets" heading are all Exclusives, and not Design By ME, which, by their very nature of being customised products, have no serial numbers. Unless there are contrary arguments, I will proceed with modifying this section accordingly. George Adam Horváth (talk) 20:08, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Design By ME vs. Exclusives 

message: I have used this information as reference for the information. However, I have asked Lego Customer Care to clarify the continuation of LDD and Pick-a-Brick, which was via a separate e-mail communication. Any ideas if I should (and if yes, how) include that reference? George Adam Horváth (talk) 20:30, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discontinuation information added 

message: The "Pricing" section reads like a PR department from LEGO Group wrote it to calm consumer sentiment on the high price. Why are these talking points listed in a list? Shouldn't this rather be condensed into a small number of sentences? Douira100 (talk) 20:53, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Pricing section reads like a PR department wrote it 

message: I think Lego Digital Designer need to have its own page as its older more relevant than Design byMe since its no more since 2012 but LDD is still/can be used yet its development is discontinued for now. Also more info regarding LDD can be added separate from Design byMe service. --Comrade-yutyo (talk) 10:07, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I think, despite Lego's recent decision to redirect LDD page to BrickLink Studio, Lego Digital Designer should have its own page for historical matters. Comrade-yutyo (talk) 08:40, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A standalone page for Lego Digital Designer
Talk:Fusion (Kent State University)

message: The CorenSearchBot is in error
--BostonEast12 08:02, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Chicago Civic Opera

message: I propose merging the article Chicago Opera Association into this page. This page both covers the Chicago Opera Association and its continuation, and do not see it necessary to have a separate page about the Chicago Opera Association.SecretName101 (talk) 08:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed and  Klbrain (talk) 17:38, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Frankenthal

message: The undiscussed move of this article from its previous name :Frankenthal to its present one is not effective - we now have :Frankenthal, Germany vs :Frankenthal, Saxony, which is meaningless, as of course Saxony is also in Germany - and the same user's attempts at disambiguation have not been especially successful either.
As over 95% of the links to :Frankenthal are to the subject of this article, ie Frankenthal in Rhineland-Palatinate, I request the move of the article back to its previous name :Frankenthal - plus the addition of  to point to the already existing :Frankenthal (disambiguation) page. I am unble to do this myself as the title has been reused. HeartofaDog (talk) 13:37, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Move / name change
Talk:South Australian Lotteries

message: * What I think should be changed (include citations):
- can we change the first sentence to: 
South Australian Lotteries (SA Lotteries), is a licensed entity that operates in South Australia as an official lotteries company. 
- Suggested to be added: 
The license to operate lotteries in South Australia is owned by the South Australian Government and Tatts Lotteries SA Pty Ltd (Tatts) continues its appointment as the exclusive Master Agent to operate the Commission’s products and brands for a term of 40 years.  SA Lotteries now markets as a jurisdictional brand under “The Lott, (which also includes Tatts, NSW Lotteries and Golden Casket)” an entity of The Lottery Corporation.  
SA Lotteries is licensed to offer lottery tickets and Instant Scratch-Its to customers through a network of licensed lottery outlets. Tickets are also offered online at TheLott.com and via The Lott app. The lottery draws for Powerball, Monday and Wednesday X Lotto, Saturday X Lotto and Oz Lotto close at 7.30pm AEST and are televised on Channel Seven, five nights a week. 
- it would be suggested to have a subheading with 'history' where the 'In November 1965' starts. 
- Under history section it would be recommended to added:
In 2015, Tatts Group launched The Lott as a master brand that united Tatts Group’s Australian lottery brands including Tatts, NSW Lotteries, Golden Casket and SA Lotteries under one banner.  
In December 2017, Tatts Group merged with Tabcorp Holdings Limited to form a diversified gambling and entertainment group under the Tabcorp brand.   
In June 2022, Tabcorp's Lotteries & Keno business demerged to form The Lottery Corporation™ - the leader in the Australian lotteries and Keno market, and one of the highest performing lottery businesses globally.  
There have been many changes to the SA Lotteries game portfolio over the years with some games being discontinued and other exciting new games being launched. The current portfolio includes the games of Saturday X Lotto, Monday and Wednesday X Lotto, Oz Lotto, Powerball, Super 66, Lucky Lotteries, Set for Life, Instant Scratch-Its and Keno.    
 
* Why it should be changed:
- Since the demerger of the company, there have been significant developments that have not been reflected in the article. Updating this information will provide readers with a more comprehensive understanding of the company's current status. As someone closely involved with the company post-demerger, I've got insights and updates that are relevant and essential for maintaining the article's relevance and accuracy.
* References supporting the possible change (format using the "cite" button): 
https://www.thelott.com/salotteries
GeorgeatTLClotteries (talk) 02:18, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The changes are not supported by neutral, independent, reliable sources. Please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made.   Encoded (talk) 17:33, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Talk:Croweater

message: This page is a series of dictionary definitions (something which Wikipedia is not).  It explains the meaning, etymology and usage notes of a slang word.  I can't find any encyclopedic content on this page.  Nothing here rises past what I would expect to read in a truly great unabridged dictionary.  The definitions and usage discussions belong over in Wiktionary where folks with the right skills, interests and lexical tools can more easily sort out the meanings and origins.
Options to fix the page here include:
# Expand the page with encyclopedic content - that is, content that goes well beyond the merely lexical.
# Redirect the page to a more general page.
# Replace the current contents with a soft-redirect to Wiktionary (usually done using the  template).
Pending a better answer, I'm implementing option 3 for now.  The lexical content has already been merged into the Wiktionary page.  Rossami (talk) 23:43, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expand, merge or redirect
Talk:Trend Drinks

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20070309193058/http://www.trenddrinks.com.au:80/history.php. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:42, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Michael Ristow

message: Given the results from the Web of Science / Web of Knowledge search depicted above, and given the Wikipedia rules on notability  (see there, especially paragraph on 'Criteria' (3.)), unclear notability tags were subjected to removal. Michael Ristow has been cited more than 1,600 times by independent parties. His most frequently cited article was published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 1998; it was cited 278 times as of Dec 18th, 2007. Cmale (talk) 19:16, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject South Australia

message: Wind power in South Australia has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Chidgk1 (talk) 08:12, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Could someone update Wind power in South Australia? 

message: I have nominated Liberal Movement (Australia) for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:21, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured article review Liberal Movement (Australia) 

message: See discussion for linking both needs-photo and state parameters: Template talk:WikiProject Australia#Both needs-photo and state parameters --ThylacineHunter (talk) 05:42, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another update request for Template:WikiProject Australia
Talk:Riley One-Point-Five

message: How weak was the clutch / badly arranged was the gearing / gutless was the torque / peaky was the max power / non-existent was the aero / all of the above that a 68bhp car weighing less than a tonne took almost TWENTY FIVE seconds to reach 60mph?
I present to you the 45bhp, not especially torquey, 4-speed, brick-shaped 80s/early 90s VW Polo. 950kg typical kerb weight. 0-62mph in just under 20, official; about 18 seconds off my own stopwatch. A 69bhp Vauxhall of a porkier 1100kg (and a 5-speed, but somewhat longer-legged box (4th being what the VW may have called "5th" if it had one) could do it in about 14 secs. Or not much worse than HALF the time.
So... WTF? Are these figures correct? Did it damn near stall out off the line, but then end up with vapourised friction disc material billowing out from under it as it struggled past 50? I mean, I can credit something that powerful still not being able to break 80mph, given the drag it must have, and the epically short gearing of a lot of older cars designed for hilly, twisty country lanes and monstrous overloading rather than light-duty motorway blasts; but still, 60mph is a long way from 76 in "losing acceleration to drag" terms, and motorsports-like gearing should have given it an accelerative BOOST... 77.102.101.220 (talk) 23:36, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Edit: Whoops, I must have blanked the bit saying it was the Riley with 68, and the Wolsely (for whom the other figures were quoted) being a mysterious "almost 20hp" less. So, 49-50hp, then? The figures aren't quite so embarrassing in that case, but still. 50hp for a 25s 0-60; 45hp for a 19.8s 0-62 on cars of about the same weight and slipperiness, the slower of which more than likely packs 4 gears into the space of 3 on the quicker one (which can pull to just over 90mph in it's top ratio). Sure I've seen manufacturer claims for about 80mph max and low-20s 0-100km/h on a 40-odd bhp Skoda of the same period. There's still something iffy going on. Do we have a source for performance figures on the Riley at all? 77.102.101.220 (talk) 23:43, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  crikey!
Talk:Bhutan Observer

message: As far as I can make out http://www.bhutanobserver.com/ is not the website of the Bhutan Observer newspaper - and there appears to be no relationship between the two. Chris Fynn 09:07, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Website of The Bhutan Observer is: http://www.bhutanobserver.bt/ Chris Fynn (talk) 10:23, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Website

message: I've rewritten the article in light of a very clear WP:COPYVIO lifted from the BO website's "About Us" page. Not every issue with the BO is covered, but here's a new start. JFHJr (㊟) 21:50, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio
Talk:Hillman Minx

message: Perhaps I missed it in the article, but I wonder about the choice of the name Minx. Does it have another meaning in the UK apart from, well, a wench? The Wolseley Wench? Sounds just as appropriate as Hillman Minx to Yank ears. 96.237.184.133 (talk) 14:16, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Wiktionary has an etymology of "obsolete spelling of mink (“any of various semi-aquatic, carnivorous mammals in the Mustelinae subfamily”)". HiLo48 (talk) 22:59, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, something more like that. 96.237.184.133 (talk) 17:29, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why Minx?
Talk:Austin 7

message: Is it right to refer to the 7 as a micro car as its a. Far older than the term and b. Would have been considered as a larger type of car at the time given the way cars have become bigger across the ranges.(Morcus (talk) 00:48, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Seeing as there were other, far larger and more powerful vehicles around at the time, micro-car can probably be justified. It definitely was not thought of as a larger type of car at the time - there was even a song written during the '30's (aptly named 'My Austin seven'), wich makes light jest of the size of the A7. I like to think of my A7 as the 1934 equivalent to a Smart.Charlski (talk) 19:11, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I would think minicar would be closer, but there are no concrete definitions. 86.4.152.167 (talk) 17:44, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've changed the class to "Subcompact" as I think "microcar"  would equate more to "cyclecars" during this period.  --Thefrood (talk) 15:51, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In June 1958 an Austin Seven was winched overnight onto the roof of Cambridge University Senate House by a team of 12 university engineering students. The stunt was widely reported in the press at the time, and was re-enacted in June 2013:  Martinevans123 (talk) 19:32, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  1958 Cambridge University prank 
Talk:MG Magnette

message: I have the same skepticism towards the performance figures here as on the Riley 1.5/Wolsley 1500... it'd be interesting to see just what Motor's methods were. Or at least, how damn heavy the Mk1 Magnette must have been, how poor the drivetrain (weak clutch/bad gear ratios), and how lacking in torque/a sufficiently wide powerband the engine was. 60bhp for a >20s 0-60? (The top speed is a feature of it's time, though, it seems - poor aerodynamics and short gearing) Probably for a car that weighed little over a tonne?
For one thing, the <10% power increase in the Mk2 cannot be responsible for the significant performance improvements alone... you'd be upping the top speed by 3-4% (2.5-3.0mph) and dropping 9% off the acceleration (down to maybe 21.0s) at best. Either some other overhaul of the machine and its systems & bodywork has taken place, or their testing & measuring methods have been revised. Note how the mk3 with a different shell but the same engine then gets slower once again... 77.102.101.220 (talk) 23:54, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  hmmm 

message: Following the notice put on the article I have looked at the alleged "source" at uniquecarsandparts.com/car_info_mg_magnette.htm.
In my opinion the uniquecarsandparts.com has actually borrowed material from here, certainly some of my additions to the wikipedia appear there. I am therefore removing the notice.
Malcolma (talk) 09:38, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright vio
Talk:Gisela Harum

message: The article says that she was "8th at Folkestone 1933" - as if it was an accomplishment.  She was 8th out of eight.  She lost all 14 games. Bubba73 (You talkin' to me?), 05:59, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, she did not lose any games there since she simply couldn't afford to participate. The Austrian Chess Federation had no money and in one of the biggest scandals in its history had players finance their own participation on the chess olympiad. Gisela Harum was unable to appear, even though she was allowed to play. Source: Wiener Schachzeitung 1933, especially: Die Schacholympiade in Folkestone. In: Wiener Schachzeitung, issue 12, June 1933, p. 177–178  --Constructor 17:02, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  8th place
Talk:Thenmuli Rajaratnam/Archive

message: I just refactored the discussion here because I feel it is better if the rape discussion is discussed independently of the terrorist allegation. This does of course not mean that such a connection can not be made; I am aware that SAR23 introduced the rape argument in order to strengthen the point that she was not a terrorist, but since SAR23 didn't write so explicitly there was luckily no problem with refactoring. I did remove the words "There seems to be a number of issues relating to this article" because they became superfluous. I tried to be neutral; if I made any mistakes please let me know below. — Sebastian 01:57, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Refactored 

message: There is alot of dead convo with extremely confusing formatting on this talk page. I will archive it within 36 hours if no objections are raised.--Sharz 06:42, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Archiving
Talk:Paula Wolf-Kalmar

message: She wasn't awarded honorary WGM???? FIDE does it for men and GM title. It's weird. She was top 3 at world championship multiple times. 213.149.62.70 (talk) 23:58, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: The name of this lady was Paula Wolf. Nothing else. "Kalmar" was the name of her first husband whom she hated deeply.--146.255.63.11 (talk) 11:03, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Her real name
Talk:Katarina Beskow

message: According to our article, Beskow played in her first Women's World Championship tournament when she was 59 or 60 and her last Women's WC when she was 69 or 70.  It would be interesting to find some references that told us more about her. Quale (talk) 05:44, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age 

message: Verified in 2 places that Beskow died in 11/8 1939 in Salzburg
[1] https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sveriges-d%C3%B6dbok_Catarina-Beskow.png 
[2] https://www.svd.se/arkiv/1939-08-18/2 -> Svenska Dagbladet. 18 augusti 1939.
IngimarE (talk) 08:17, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  death date
Talk:Honda X11

message: It is not patent nonsense as there should be an article on the Honda X11. There are many articles on far less encyclopaedic things. It will require cleanup. Hackboy1 10:00, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I did not create the article it was realkarthik. Yes i'm for a re-direct on honda main page. I know nothing about Hondas btw I was just trying to help the article survive. Hackboy1 11:16, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Could possibly be merged with Honda CB1100F.--Addhoc 16:24, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Keep the page
Talk:The Holidays

message: See my User talk:Sparkelman11.
I have been approved this article by User:Dihydrogen_Monoxide
--Sparkelman11 10:08, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think this article may have been vandalized. I need to review the edit history. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:30, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Don't speedy delete
Talk:Gala Day

message: Gala days happen in many towns and villages in scotland and sound quite similar to the current description. Maybe someone who knows more could add some info.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.66.113.165 (talk) 12:15, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gala Days in Scotland 

message: This content should be given its own article titled "Geelong Gala Day", since that is what it's about.
There are a great many towns holding Galas - an article titled "Gala Day" should look at the phenomenon from a more general perspective.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.199.197.210 (talk) 12:44, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inappropriate Title 

message: How do we know that Geelong's Gala day is one of the biggest?
What is being measured? :
Duration? / Number turning out to watch it? / Amount of money raised for charitable purposes? / Number of floats? / Length of procession? .....
Is it because Geelong is a big town or because the Gala is especially important locally?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.199.197.210 (talk) 13:08, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Size of the Gala
Talk:Winger, Minnesota

message: I'm concerned that while the band Winger is clearly very notable, there's a strong case that Winger (sports) may be the pre-eminent world usage of the word "Winger". 
The hat-notes at "Winger" are good, but the guideline Wikipedia:Disambiguation#Primary_topic makes me believe that the status quo is incorrect.
To avoid a painful and contentious contest between sports and music fans (Not to mention the residents of Winger, which I'm sure is a lovely place to live) can I suggest that we move the band's article to Winger (band) and make Winger a disambiguation page.
I've posted this to the band, sports and location talk pages, but all comments at Talk:Winger please, to keep the conversation centralised. --Dweller 10:38, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambig
Talk:Charlotte Square

message: Charlotte Square: Numerous ghosts are believed to inhabit the area, including a phantom beggar, a monk and even a piano player. http://news.scotsman.com/features/Why-youve-more-than-a.2578441.jp  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.208.26.179 (talk) 12:37, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Haunted 

message: I believe that the Trust HQ were on the south side of the square and have been sold and are currently under renovation. The Edinburgh World Heritage Trust website gives its address as Bakehouse Close in the Canongate and there seems to be no apparent connection with Charlotte Square. Kim Traynor (talk) 15:52, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accuracy of article re National Trust HQ and Edinburgh World Heritage Trust 

message: Apparently there is a board game named after the square, but I can't find a decent reference for it other than here:
http://boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/18538/charlotte-square --188.74.64.241 (talk) 00:48, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Board Game
Talk:Middletown

message: Middletown%2c_Massachusetts  has been referenced on multiple occasions by  "Boston_Legal".
Thank You,
 hopiakuta  Please do  sign  your  signature  on your  message.  %7e%7e   Thank You. - 10:45, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[ Boston_Legal ]] [[ Middletown%2c_Massachusetts ]]