lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Template talk:User Mexico

message: Hey guys, what do you think about this new template:
Do you think is better than the current one?
*As someone from Australia who is not familiar with Mexico, I'd have to say the second one. I prefer the colour scheme, it's more distinctive. The wording however is an interesting question. I was previously not aware that the full name is the United Mexican States, so i've learned something today :-). Your call on whether the wording should be changed, but i do prefer the old colour scheme. And as stated i'm not from Mexico so feel free to take this advice with a grain of salt. THE KING 23:12, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for your comment, and thought that instead of chaging this one, I would create a new template, so Mexican citizents, will have 2 choises to choose from XD Supaman89 01:06, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

text: I'm the one that created the present template as it is. I have to say I'm impressed by the comment from this Australian Wikipedian. I think we should change the name, because it let people learn the official name of the country. AlexCov   ( Let's talk! ) 23:42, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What do you think

message: I just noticed that there are about 4 or 5 user boxes about Mexico in Nationality user templates and Nation of origin user templates categories that contain a text that communicate different ideas. For example, I think that this user box should not be in Nationality user templates category, as Mexico can be your country of origin, but it doesn´t implies that you are an official citizen of Mexico. I'm not against the existence of several user boxes, I just would like that all of them to be classified correctly and contain a text that communicates the same idea. Ccristoo (talk) 23:20, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Organizing user boxes
Talk:Pembroke, Virginia

message: Ref 1 needs updated to http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/community_facts.xhtml.  I have no idea how to do this for the way the references are templated.
Also, the numerics sometimes are off - at the ref the poverty level is reported as 10.2% (article says 11.7).  Median household income is reported as $37500 (article says $29437).  Median age & population do agree however.
--Billymac00 (talk) 03:42, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link update
Talk:British railway technical manuals

message: I created this page because most of the documents lack a page of their own, though I'm slowly trying to fix that. "Techincal Manuals" is how National Rail refer to the ones their website mentions. It seems a fair title, but there may be a better one. There is I think a role for this page as an "overview" page, in addition to document-specific pages, explaining how the documents relate etc, who is controlling them in this age of privatised railways etc. Thoughts on the title though? Graldensblud 14:33, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name of article

message: "Additionally, there exist the UK railway by-laws, which exist under the Transport Act 2000. [13]. It is noted for beginning with item 1 as "queuing"; both the existence of bylaws on the subject, and their prominent placement, being seen as typical of Britain in some quarters."15:44, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: What on earth does this mean?
File talk:Meusoc86.gif

message: The uploader of the image claims public domain, since it was created by a United States federal employee. However, I'm certain that the image is from an article in the December 2003 of SWAT Magazine. Selected articles of SWAT magazine are on the website AR15.com, including this article.  There is no indication in the article that it was taken by a federal employee. Pettifogger 23:19, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Image has been replaced by uploader.  New image is different and is not contained in the document obtained from the URL listed above.  I've removed the speedy delete tag. — ERcheck (talk) 01:17, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright violation
Talk:Battle of Karanovasa

message: Ensured that the article is within project scope, tagged for task forces, and assessed for class. --Rosiestep (talk) 00:30, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008]] 
Talk:Khepresh

message: "Amenhotep III was the first king whose is known to have worn the Blue Crown, as he is the first king to be depicted doing so." (...) "The crown did not disappear until the Kushite Dynasty (747 to 656 BCE), when it ceased to be depicted." Despite the sources these claims are somewhat dubious to me, since the use of the Khepresh is attested long before Amenhotep III and very long after the Kushite Dynasty: just for saying, a check in the Commons category will give pharaohs outside these ranges, wearing the khepresh such as Amenhotep II, Nectanebo II and an unnamed 30th-to-Ptolemaic Dynasty king. Khruner (talk) 17:34, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed the text based on a journal article that goes into some detail about the crown's origins. It says the Blue Crown evolved from the cap crown in the early Eighteenth Dynasty and reached its full form in the time of Hatshepsut/Thutmose III. It also says that the Kushites abandoned the Blue Crown in favor of the original cap crown. The paper says nothing about the use of the Blue Crown after the Kushites, but I changed the wording in that part of the article, so it wouldn't state that the Blue Crown was never used again. A. Parrot (talk) 18:28, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious claims 

message: I removed the following from the article: "Another possibility is that the khepresh was woven like a basket, as the deshret (red crown) is known to have been, from plant fiber such as grass, straw, flax, palm leaf, or reed. The regular array of circles on painted and sculpted depictions of the crown may be an artistic approximation of the hexagonal holes in an open triaxial weave." This text was added two years ago by a user at IP address 2602:306:c428:1e00:38fc:8b8c:3850:d23a, without a source. Others have put "citation needed" tags on it, but I'm just removing it. As it's not wildly implausible, I'm copying it here in case a source can be found to support it. A. Parrot (talk) 17:10, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  More unsourced text
Talk:Los Abandoned (EP)

message: I created the article so the information and image located here could be removed from the Los Abandoned. However, I barely know the band and as you might notice the article lacks such basic information such as what label it was released through and the credits. If someone knows more information on the album feel free to add it.--Leon Sword 23:36, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub

message: I think this should be titled "Self-titled EP" as it is the name that appears on the cd, the compilation of the first two cds and the official webpage.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.142.233.120 (talk) 20:31, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name Change 

message: This album appears non-notable, and besides that, WP:NALBUM recommends merging to the artist's page when the article is unlikely to grow beyond a stub. I'm doing that now. Skeletor3000 (talk) 17:54, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect
Talk:MetroLink (Halifax)

message: Nice work! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sprocket (talk • contribs).
:Thank ya! --hfx_chris 13:57, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:First tithe

message: Hello. The edit by User:FDuffy had removed all material about the role of this tithe in contemporary Jewish practice and had characterized belief in tithes as "Jewish folklore". I reverted on both bases.
Much of the material added is legitimate and can eventually be added back in in appropriately labeled sections with sources and POV identified. However, I don't have time right now to painstakingly do so, as I did with similar edits to Maaser Sheni. The person adding new edits is responsible for complying with WP:NPOV including the obligation not to remove existing well-sourced material in order to present solely ones own views as well as the obligation not to present a truth claim about a religious belief as fact. We can sort this out later. Best, --Shirahadasha 23:38, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explanation for Revert 

message: Proposing merge given parallel articles on essentially same subject representing two POVs. --Shirahadasha 03:45, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Levite Tithe]] 

message: I have place an "under construction" tag on the page with intent to further (attempt to) improve the article in terms of references and accurate detail.--Marecheth Ho'eElohuth (talk) 22:05, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edits
Talk:Supreme Court of Indonesia

message: Please place comments here rather than in edit summaries. Thank you SatuSuro 23:40, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Differences

message: How can this be the only notable decision? If it is to remain by itself, it is POV. How can we say that the Bashir decision is notable when there is nothing else to compare it to. What other decisions by this court are notable? I have commented it out until it can be shown that this is more notable than any other decision (which is what is implied by only listing one). If you don’t know what other decisions are, how can you say that the one listed is notable. I suggest this simply represents an Australian point of view. There is nothing wrong with an Australian point of view, but it is still nonetheless a POV and non neutral. Merbabu 03:40, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Incomplete and POV

message: Hi there! Just finished a bunch of high res insignias for RI government branches. On my lists are DPR (, ), DPD (,), the supreme court (, ), BPK (,). All are in commons now. Feel free to use them. (There doesn't seem to be articles for BPK currently, does it?).
I need help working on the insignia of the president of indonesia. I'm thinking maybe using the presidential seal (those on headers of lembar negaras) or the presidential medal (worn by them in left chest on formal pics). For both, I couldn't find any pics on the net with adequate resolution for me to reproduce. Need help on this part.
:barkahyusuf (talk) 12:59, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Insignia for MA

message: I'm going to try to add a list of current justices on the supreme court. Unfortunately, the most up-to-date info seems to be in Indonesian, which I don't know very well, so assistance would be appreciated.
A list of former justices would be more ambitious as it would undoubtedly include more individuals. I'm almost afraid to tackle that one. MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:44, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: If you are only after a list, id-wiki is a good place to start. --HyperGaruda (talk) 22:04, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:   I managed to compile id:Daftar hakim Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia by scraping into Indonesian sources; there is still a lot of works to do (verifying start of term and end of term date; assigning chambers; finding out where the justices went to law school; what was their leadership positions). dwf² ✉ 09:49, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: , nice to see a response even five years on. I’m getting back into the groove of things here, but I’ll see if I can contribute again too. MezzoMezzo (talk) 15:40, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current justices
Talk:Poor man's tithe

message: Hello. The edit by User:FDuffy which had removed all material about the role of this tithe in contemporary Jewish practice and had characterized belief in tithes as "Jewish folklore". I reverted on both bases.
Much of the material added is legitimate and can eventually be added back in in appropriately labeled sections with sources and POV identified. However, I don't have time right now to painstakingly do so, as I did with similar edits to Maaser Sheni. The person adding new edits is responsible for complying with WP:NPOV including the obligation not to remove existing well-sourced material in order to present solely ones own views as well as the obligation not to present a truth claim about a religious belief as fact. We can sort this out later. Best, --Shirahadasha 23:42, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explanation for Revert
Talk:Keita Takahashi

message: Some of the games credited here are in error. While it is true that Omega Force, who make the Dynasty Warriors games, have a programmer whose name is Keita Takahashi, the Keita Takahashi this article refers to is not a programmer at all, but a conceptual artist. He cannot program at all to my knowledge. The real clincher is that Katamari Damacy and the various Dynasty Warriors projects cited run in parallel - but the Keita Takahashi about whom this article refers works for Namco-Bandai, not for Omega Force/Koei. 
Hope this clears this issue up! If not, I suggest you run your own research. 67.172.109.240 18:33, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Omega Force Keita Takahashi is a seperate individual 
Talk:Foclut

message: "I heard the voices of those Irish who live near the woods of Focluth near the Western Sea."
This very obviously references Strathclyde and is talking about Dalriada.
This may come as shock to some people, but most modern scholarship doesn't place the Irish as invaders of Scotland, but a mixture of people from both seashores for centuries pre-historically given that each seashore can be seen with the naked eye on a sunny day.
Patrick knew of Dalriada about the same time as the purported "invasion" that isn't really borne out by the archaelogical record. If anything at all it was a return of natives with a new tongue.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.37.17.201 (talk) 15:31, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Foclut and Strathclyde (Ystrad Clud or Alclud/Strath-Clota/Alt Clut)
Talk:Stębark

message: How is the area of this village in km²?  Rudko (talk) 01:26, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Area 

message: It was a German city, stolen from Germany, like Danzig, Breslau, Memel, Posen, territory stretching all the way from the current German border all the way to Memel (now called Klaipeda) Germany. This is the biggest propaganda site on the internet, turning history upside down. 20 million people were driven out of cities they lived in since the 1200's, and wikipedia liars make extra effort to justify the theft of those lands and cities and the brutal ethnic cleansing of 20 million Germans and make historic German cities Polish, Czech and Lithuanian. 2001:7D0:888E:3900:F8CB:ED41:A1BE:7067 (talk) 19:23, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "again part of Poland"?
Template talk:Political parties in Scotland

message: Um, is this not just a less useful replica of ? --Nema Fakei 23:48, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

message: I am not sure that it is worth including things like the Squadrone Volante and the Kirk Party which were not political parties in the modern sense of the term, but unofficial factions in the Scottish Parliament (and to an extent the wider governing classes) whose membership was very fluid. Dunarc (talk) 20:30, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps it might be worth going down the road of the Welsh Template: Template:Political parties in Wales and remove the Other registered and defunct parties altogether. Angryskies (talk) 17:48, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  I would have no objection to that as it would solve a lot of problems. Dunarc (talk) 23:57, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pre 1707 'Parties'
Talk:The Oxford Revue

message: The 'current activities' section is very much out of date. I would suggest removing this altogether. Perhaps replacing with a list of performances, which can include both upcoming and past performances. 'Current activities' is not very encyclopaedic either, for this it is better to be referred to the groups webpage.
I do not have the knowledge to perform these edits myself, but hope that someone else who does will do this.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.227.236.252 (talk) 20:50, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Oxford bags

message: Not sure if this is in the WP's remit, but still an entertaining article worth looking at and expanding? Cricketgirl 23:50, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: WP University of Oxford

message: *The style originated from a ban in 1924 on the wearing of knickers by Oxford (and Cambridge) undergraduates at lectures.
Citation, please?  And is this ban still in force?  I hereby nominate myself as Extraordinary Cambridge Knicker Inspector.  Please be quick, for nominations close… now.—Dah31 (talk) 23:32, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Oxbridge knicker ban
Talk:EDINA

message: I don't really understand what EDINA is, and I'm no wiser after reading this article.  It looks like it may well be a copyvio, although a quick google didn't find anything. It certainly isn't in the wikipedia style, and most of the information on here seems only tenuously linked to the subject. Maccoinnich 23:51, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've rewritten the page, maintaining a neutral style - I hope - and am in the process of adding notes. Paulstephenmilne (talk) 15:20, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Major Update 2010/07/21
Talk:Naked festival

message: Would this not be better placed at Hadaka Matsuri? "Naked festival" is a very broad term, and could be interpreted to referring not only to these observances in Japan, but to any number of stupid fraternity traditions or whatever. Right? In order to make the article's title more culturally specific, it should be placed at the Japanese title. LordAmeth 23:55, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I am indifferent personally.  I did a quick Google search before creating the article ... "Naked festival" has more hits than "hadaka matsuri" and all of the hits on the first few pages at least were about hadaka matsuri, not about other events.  As to whether it's a "broad term" I don't know ... again, personally I've never heard of a "naked festival" referring to anything but a hadaka matsuri, so I'm not sure it's any more broad in English than it is in Japanese.  When in doubt, I tend to favor the English term for this kind of thing as it's more accessible for non-Japanophiles.  But if others favored a move, I would not be against it. CES 02:19, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Japanese name for an intrisically Japanese thing is the way to go.61.7.120.20 02:05, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

text: I redirected the page, so it's under Hadaka Matsuri and I am moving the wikiproject note to the discussion there. Claytonian 03:21, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Bunker (disambiguation)

message: A 'bunker' can also refer to the big tanks that bunkering fuel is stored in — that's where it gets its name! 220.245.245.185 (talk) 23:14, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Also the big tanks

message: Many dab pages helpfully include "Foo" and "The Foo" in one page, and I suggest this should happen here. The book and comic have already been listed on the "Bunker (disambiguation)" page although their titles include "The ". The Theatre is referred to in some places (https://www.theguardian.com/stage/2016/oct/16/skin-a-cat-review-bunker-theatre-london-vaginismus-lydia-larson-isley-lynn-drama) without "The ". Readers will be better served by a combined dab page. PamD 08:24, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Any objection if I close this now and merge? Leschnei (talk) 12:35, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Fine by me. Narky Blert (talk) 12:43, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: And by me: thanks! PamD 12:46, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Leschnei (talk) 00:16, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[The Bunker]] into [[Bunker (disambiguation)]]
Talk:Oxford University (UK Parliament constituency)

message: According to DNB / ODNB:
* the ecclesiastical lawyer Sir Daniel Dun or Donne (1544/5–1617) was elected MP for Oxford University in 1604 and 1614
* Sir John Danvers (1584/5–1655) was MP in 1621, & re-elected in 1625, 1626 and 1628. 
* Sir Clement Edmondes (1567/8?–1622) was also MP in 1621
* Sir Isaac Wake (1580/81–1632) and secretary of state Sir George Calvert (1579/80–1632) represnted Oxford University in the Parliament that met in Feb. 1624
* John Selden represented Oxford University in the Long Parliament, until excluded by Pride's Purge
Dsp13 (talk) 21:01, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Other names
Talk:Thresholding (image processing)

message: The paragraph of the section in multiband thresholding:
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 111.93.245.37 (talk) 13:56, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: In histology images the colour is given by 2 or more dyes, for example hematoxylin and DAB. The contributions of these two dyes to the colour image can be established by using colour deconvolution. The incident light is measured by looking at an unstained part of the slide. Then you measure the relative absorption of each the 3 RGB components of the image by each dye. Absorption is defined by Beer's Law. The absorption characteristics for each dye can be obtained by measuring the RGB components of the colour in areas of the slide that are only coloured by one dye. The computer software can solve 3 linear equations for each pixel in the image, one for each colour channel, in order to resolve the amounts of each of the dyes at each locus in the image. This method can resolve up to 3 different dyes. The result is an image for each dye, showing the amount of that dye throughout the image. This allows the amount of dye to be quantified, which is important for image analysis of immunohistochemical stains.
I'm unsure what this has to do with multi-band thresholding. it may be an example of multi-band thresholding, but there is too much background information; should this be it's own stub? Albert Cruz 19:51, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Last paragraph of multiband thresholding

message: I removed the following:
:Another approach is to calculate the new threshold in step four using the weighted average of m_1 and m_2: T’ = (||G_1||*m_1 + ||G_2||*m_2)/(||G_1||+||G_2||), where ||G_n|| is the number of pixels in G_n. This approach often gives a more accurate result.
because it appears to do nothing more than calculate the mean value of all the pixels, independent of the threshold value.  The mean of G_1 pixels times the number of G_1 pixels is the sum of G_1 pixels.  Same goes for G_2.  The union of G_1 and G_2 is the whole image, so the sum of those products is the sum of all the pixels in the image and ||G_1|| + ||G_2 is the number of pixels in the image.  Ergo, their quotient is the mean of all the pixels in the image.
Bryan Henderson 22:15, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weighted average doesn't make sense 

message: It appears to me that citations are in parenthetical form rather than Wikipedia's format. Is there a reason for this?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Imyxh (talk • contribs) 01:04, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's up with the citations?
Talk:Archie Goodall

message: Can someone please add these links in relation to the Archie Goodall Headstone Campaign.
https://www.derbytelegraph.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/mans-race-give-forgotten-derby-9050687
https://www.pnefc.net/news/2024/january/donate-towards-headstone-for-preston-north-end-invincible/
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-derbyshire-68068576
https://www.dcfc.co.uk/news/2024/01/donations-being-welcomed-to-fund-archie-goodalls-headstone 2A00:23C7:F30F:C601:6086:4369:3B8:745A (talk) 16:51, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Headstone
Talk:Moon Sung-hyun (politician)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. WP:SNOWCLOSE presumable uncontroversial technical request. (non-admin closure) Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 01:47, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Moon Sung-hyun →  – not WP:PRIMARYTOPIC Joeykai (talk) 14:10, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 1 June 2024