Talk:Tourism in Uzbekistan

message: I will read the article and make suggestions here. FloNight talk  12:56, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Reading Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not might be helpful. It explains why some content is not encyclopedic. FloNight talk  13:00, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion about suggested changes 

message: In my opinion the last added text titled: Ethics and human rights is not relevant to the context of this page. It mostly bears the political assessment than discloses real situation at the country. More about my opinion you can read here UzbekistanDmitriy A. Pitirimov
Text in question
The human rights record of Uzbekistan reflects its status as a nominal democracy that has frequently been described as a police state. Several prominent opponents of the government have fled, and among those who have remain, some have been arrested. The government severely represses those it suspects of Islamic extremism. Some 5,300 to 5,800 suspected extremists are incarcerated. (See main article, Human rights in Uzbekistan).
:A very brief comment about human rights is appropriate but it should tie in with the topic better. FloNight talk  13:42, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm surprised that the (virtually unquestioned) fact that Uzbekistan is a police state could in any way be considered inappropriate.  Most people in booking their holidays try to avoid countries with such poor human rights records.Vizjim 14:16, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I am not questioning the content or the importance of the text. This is one of the pitfalls of vacationing in Uzbekistan. The creator of the article is a new editor. I am trying to help him understand how to write an article that is WP:NPOV. Discussing this text that he questioned is a good opportunity to explain WP:NPOV. Also the wording of the text could tie in with the topic better. FloNight talk  14:37, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: True.  I'll try a rewrite later on when I get more time.Vizjim 15:08, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

text: God, yeah, I agree - it looks stupendously beautiful (if not quite as lovely as Kyrgyzstan). Vizjim 15:08, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The political variancies of a nation has little to do with whether it has tourist spots. The dangers, however, of any political unrest should likely be noted. Perhaps a glance to the US Dept. of State announcements in regards to travel there.  --DanielCD 15:18, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Often, human rights organizations encourage tourists to boycott coutries with extreme human rights issues. Sometimes with an organized boycott. If something like that is happening, it could might be mentioned. FloNight talk  15:32, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ethics and human rights 

message: Could someone give a clear statement of why the POV tag remains on this article? It seems to need cleanup more than de-POVing. --DanielCD 14:25, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Mostly needs copy edit. Not pov to the point it needs tag. Will remove. --FloNight 00:10, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: POV tag

message: Hello, in fact English isn't my native language. Therefore I possibly have made many mistakes. If you found some, please excuse me. If you want to help please edit this article. Your any assistance would be greatly appreciated. Thank you. ---- Jabez 10:34, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hello, in fact English isn't my native language. 

message: It`s not advertising, this link will be useful for tourists, who wants to visit Uzbekistan. On this page collected more interesting information about Uzbekistan. --- User:Timir01 11:26, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The Wikipedia is not a travel site. :WP:NOTTRAVEL External links ought to comply with the guidelines at Wikipedia:External links.  Utility for travelers is not a valid criteria for inclusion. --Bejnar (talk) 05:14, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add link to useful information for tourists