Talk:Argentina/Archive 4

message: I want to add some pictures I took myself, but have no clue on how can I do that here, any help? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kapaue (talk • contribs) 21:29, 17 June 2006.
:Go to the Wikimedia Commons. Get a user account there in the same way you did for Wikipedia. Once you're logged in, click on "Upload file" and follow the instructions. You'll be asked to select the file, give it a name (or keep the one automatically generated by the system), give your picture a summarized description, and a license (you should select one of the licenses that start with "Own work"; I prefer the CreativeCommons Attribution ShareAlike license). Press the "Upload file" button and you're done. An image uploaded in the Commons can be used in any Wikipedia, not only the English one.
:To add an image here, see Wikipedia:Picture tutorial. In short, you need to write something like thumb|200px|right|CAPTION. That shows a thumbnail version of your image, 200 pixels wide, aligned to the right of the text, with a CAPTION text below it. —Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 18:51, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  As a wikipedia artsit I dont usually say this, but this page is over diagramed. Either they need to be made smaller or some of the less relevant ones should be removed. WikipedianProlific(Talk) 12:27, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Adding pictures

message: I've just reverted a change by :
:It is claimed by some commentators that the harsh measures [of the Dirty War] were necessary to tackle a ruthless Communist insurgency. But... 
Given that Viewfinder just correctly reverted vandalism suggesting a justification for the Dirty War, I'm sure this is not s/he meant, but it does sound like a justification; moreover, it's hardly in context. In the paragraph above that, it already says that
:During this period, extremists on the left and right carried out terrorist acts with a frequency that threatened public order.
The "ruthless Communist insurgency" was partly true, party a fiction of the Proceso. The "justification" was made by the juntas and then by other prominent members of society (even today), but it should be explained better, with very good sources, and probably not in the limited space of a general article but in Dirty War and/or History of Argentina. Tell me what you think.  —Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 22:31, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, I was only trying to put an NPOV in place of the stuff I deleted. I have no particular opinion on the matter. It seemed to me to be a neutral commenr and I don't think your "highly inflammable" accusation is fair. Viewfinder 22:39, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The qualification was for the comment, not the editor. Sorry if I didn't make myself understood. For the more-or-less politically aware Argentinian, that was Hindenburg-class flammable. Some view the justifications of the dictatorship at the time as part of a strategy of tension, and defense of those justifications (i. e. fight fire with fire) is rebuked as a so-called "doctrine of the two demons". However, as I said above, it should be treated somewhere, so thanks for bringing it up. —Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 22:58, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Necessity of the Dirty War