lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Maria Gaetana Agnesi

message: The mention to the Opera Pia Trivulzio near the end of this page is misspelled as Trivulzi. The correct name is Trivulzio.
Please see http://www.iltrivulzio.it/home.html
83.103.82.94 (talk) 06:11, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Done with thanks, NiciVampireHeart 06:19, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 16 May 2014 

message: It seems that Maria Gaetana Agnesi's father was not a mathematics professor. According to http://www-history.mcs.st-andrews.ac.uk/history/Biographies/Agnesi.html (citing A Masotti, Maria Gaetana Agnesi, Rendiconti del seminario matematico e fisico di Milano 14 (1940), 1-39.) I'm not in a position to check the cited source, so I'm not going to make the change to the article, but maybe someone here has access to it?
Meaigs (talk) 06:33, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Father's occupation 

message: There at least 2 other contradiction between this article and the source mentioned above: 
#It says she had 20 (and not 22) siblings.
#She just translated (and not complied) her lecture at the age of 9. 
I hope those could be settled הנדב הנכון (talk) 06:31, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of Siblings, the lecture at age 9 

message: The phrase "She is credited with writing the first book discussing both differential and integral calculus ..." is not tenable, as the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus was already well-known before her birth. St Andrews'  MacTutor states that Newton's Method of Fluxions  "... contains the first clear statement of the Fundamental Theorem of the Calculus"  http://www-history.mcs.st-andrews.ac.uk/HistTopics/The_rise_of_calculus.html.  IF Agnesi's book, Instituzioni analitiche ad uso della gioventù italiana, was the first teaching book to discuss both, then some further citation is needed, or the sentence needs to be re-written. Sasha (talk) 10:19, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation and Clarification Needed 

message: Not worth mentioning? 99.238.74.216 (talk) 14:04, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Google Doodle 
Talk:Genetic sexual attraction

message: The user *Treker completly ruined this article with his biased POV (removing entire sections and lot of sources). Someone needs to undo his stuff (I won't myself as I'm not a confirmed user and thus will be considered a bot if I do).— Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.241.175.56 (talk) 23:27, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverting *Treker's edits 

message: Treker is the one constantly vandalizing the article to insert his unsourced viewpoint. His edits should have been undone before protecting the article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.119.68.246 (talk) 04:52, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I have audited their edits and agree with them per WP:FRINGE. —PaleoNeonate – 06:55, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  The user Treker and the protection of the article 

message: I've reworked the intro in light of the sources used. I have no background familiarity with this topic, but I was bothered by the encyclopedia source offered in the intro to say there was "no evidence" for the position—not because it wasn't a reliable source (obviously), but because it was describing something different than what the introduction was talking.
The article previously introduced the topic this way:
:Genetic sexual attraction is a concept in which a strong sexual attraction may develop between close blood relatives who first meet as adults. There is no evidence for genetic sexual attraction being an actual phenomenon,1 and the hypothesis is regarded as pseudoscience.2
The first reference was to page 200 of the encyclopedia. I checked the encyclopedia to ensure accuracy. This is how page 200 discusses the concept:
: . . . Tsoulis-Reay also refers to Genetic Sexual Attraction (GSA), which suggests that sexual attraction might be a product of genetic similarities, although as yet there is little scientific evidence for such a position.
That yields two distinct substantive issues: First, those are different definitions, and saying there is little evidence for one of those definitions doesn't necessarily imply there is little evidence for the other. Second, the term "little scientific evidence" isn't tantamount to "no evidence."
Just for clarity: I'm referring to the Encyclopedia's definition as the "causal definition" and the phenomenon as the "phenomenon definition."  Most sources cited in the article seem to focus on the causal definition—the Slate op-ed, for example, quoted at length, says, "A better way to put it is that there is no real research supporting the notion that sharing genes with someone makes you more likely to want to have sex with them." However, I found plenty of other sources that appear to define the term as the phenomenon. As such, I changed the intro to reflect both the definition used in the encyclopedia and the supposed phenomenon.--Jerome Frank Disciple (talk) 15:38, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Related to above: Intro
Talk:A00 Sokolsky Opening 1.b4 e5

message: Where does this analysis come from? It's not taken directly from ECO is it? --Camembert
I am studying the Sokolsky Opening and I find that the moves I am going to type will be helpful:
1.b2-b4
2.c2-c3
3.d2-d3, or Ng1-f3
4.g2-g3
5.Bf1-g2
---Now usually there can come an attack on the b pawn around this time or before it, using a2-a3 is helpful along with using Qd1-b3---
6.Nb1-d2, or d2-d3 if you haven't done so already
7.Qd1-b3
8.0-0 or Bc1-b2
Then you can go from there.  I've tested it against The Sicilian, French Defense, Modern Defense, Two Knight, and more...I have come up with a score of more than 10 wins, 1 loss, and 2 draws.  If you use this opening correctly, it can become a powerful tool.  It is not used that much so it can through your opponent off somewhat, thinking you are a novice with a 1.b2-b4.  
Usually in the beginning of the game there might be futile attacks, or else you both develope.  In the Middle game you usually defend the queen side and also do a pawn storm there as well.  using the b4 pawn and pushing up your e pawn to e4 and have a3,c3,and d3 and great, along with your Knights and Queen and rooks, it has plenty of space for your pieces.  In the end game, files c, e, and/or d may be open.  Opening with the Sokolsky has rarely ever back fired.  It is more interesting that 1.e4, d4, and c4, since I've played so much with them.  
I am no great player, but I do know some things.  Try it out, you just might like it, as I do.  
Richard L. Jones
This page was voted on for deletion at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/A00 Sokolsky Opening 1.b4 e5 on Jan 18, 2005.  The consensus was to merge it to Sokolsky opening.  dbenbenn | talk 13:27, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Talk:2004 Salvadoran presidential election

message: The picture needs a caption saying who's in it.  --zandperl 18:10, 28 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It's odd that the article doesn't explore any of the winning strategy, such as ARENA's warnings that electing Handal would hurt U.S.-Salvadoran diplomatic relations and make the U.S. government less friendly toward Salvadorans living within its borders. It was an extremely effective strategy and deserves mention. I'll try to look up some good sources to cite. 
Less likely to find sources to show that many Salvadoran citizens in the eastern part of the country privately were alleging voter fraud, claiming that visitors purporting to work with the national census really were gathering information in order to be able to falsify votes in favor of ARENA. Note that I'm not supporting these allegations — as an outsider I found them more indicative of governmental distrust in areas where the popular sentiment runs toward the FMLN than of actual government misconduct — but I'll look to see if there are any solid sources to show that people made this claim. (Certainly I met more than one person who made it, but that's hardly the stuff of a citation.) --Lawikitejana 05:25, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  No mention of strategy
Talk:Mandala

message: about my life, about my thoughts etc 223.233.84.145 (talk) 05:55, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  my dairy  

message: saan matatagpuan ang mandala 120.28.215.126 (talk) 11:04, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Art 

message: Most think of the third eye as being the eye at the top of a pyramid or perhaps the Egyptian pictorial rendering of what many believe to be the Thalamus, an aperture of the mind. In actuality, there is another aperture that works in conjunction with the other mentioned and it is located at the back of the pineal gland, known as the third eye by many.  The reason I mention this is to lay some ground work to my explaining of the mandala, or for that matter even what some refer to as the diamond body, yoga nidra etc. Many know most of these by name and have at the least some idea as to what it is and what it is suppose to be or do. Just like the word sacred can be used to describe text, places, things or even aspects of our very own being, such as the heart. This is exactly what all the text, places and things are pointing towards, something real, and not just a text, place or thing! A part of our very own being! Rest assured, there are so very few who reach for or do not reach for yet happen upon one of these sacred things as to realize it is something real and not something used to or for worship etc. Such as would be an idol, or in this case even a mandala. A real mandala actually exist, just as a diamond body does or even yoga nidra, not the yoga nidra turned into a meditational practice in the 1970's by a prominent yogi. What do we know is sacred about ourselves? What do we love with? Were is the seat of our emotions. The answer is our heart. The heart is our sacred organ. Just like the atman will be seen here also, this is were a mandala can be seen also! It protects the opening to our heart like a shield and at a much deeper level then most are aware of! If a person finds themselves having a heightened level of internal awareness (darshana), it is possible to even see deities as well as see the mandala seated over their own heart! This Mandala is not material, it is spiritual.  Tony. 2601:152:C180:3470:52F:181C:826C:D1A6 (talk) 20:52, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mandala 

message: — Assignment last updated by KyreTia (talk) 22:51, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: @KyreTia @Siennatompkins$ maybe Sand_mandala#Ritual destruction may be more relevant. Redtigerxyz  Talk  17:38, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: The Destruction of Images
Talk:John Colenso

message: I've added a few stub signals, as the whole article needs to be reworked, not just wikified. It needs a fuller biographical section, then something of his theology, his political and social work, and his role as bishop and development of Anglican ecclesiastical polity, not just in south Africa, but throughout the Anglican communion. This cannot be done as a quick fix. SteveH 14:55, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Work

message: This copy below has been removed from Colenso, KwaZulu-Natal. Can it be incorporated into this article? --Jcw69 06:44, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed

message: An article in Cornish World, No.63,  April 2009, pp. 25-27 by John Jenkin "John William Colenso: St Austell's controversial bishop" is illustrated by a photograph of a window in the Church of the Holy Trinity in St Austell, commemorating Bishop Colenso.  It bears the words "He hath spoken blasphemy. . . heard his blasphemy", a reference to the trial of Jesus, as reported by Matthew 26:65.  I will try to get a picture of the window for this article. Vernon White . . . Talk  20:26, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Cornishman
Wikipedia talk:Testimonials

message: I'd like there to be a testimonials page for users to express how wonderful wikipedia is. My students in Model UN are using Wikipedia to plan their speeches and actions. I want to express my gratitude to Wikipedia through a testimonial of some sort. Kingturtle 18:57, 28 Mar 2004 (UTC)

message: Anyone else amused by the fact that WP:WOW links here now? 68.39.174.238 07:32, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Why does WP:WOW redirect here? I see it has nothing to do with testimonials. ionas68224|talk|contribs|email 01:39, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Enhh!
Talk:Proteome

message: The following is from the Proteomics page:
"The entirety of proteins in existence in an organism throughout its life cycle, or on a smaller scale the entirety of proteins found in a particular cell type under a particular type of stimulation, are referred to as the proteome of the organism or cell type respectively."
_______________________________
I think the term "proteome" is in need of some conceptual clarification. It can make sense to tie the term to individual cells. It is in the context of a functioning network of transcription factors inside a cell that we can begin to make sense of why a particular set of genes will be expressed.
Science, Vol 270, Issue 5235, 369-370 , 20 October 1995
"Mission Impossible: Follow the changes taking place in a cell by identifying the thousands of different proteins the cell produces and watching how they ebb and flow over time. But a growing band of researchers believes that improved analytical techniques may soon make such an approach feasible, and they have even coined a new term for it: proteome research."
But it also makes some sense to conceptualize the sum total of all the individual cellular proteomes in an entire multi-cellular organism.
Biotechnol Genet Eng Rev. 1996;13:19-50.
Progress with proteome projects: why all proteins expressed by a genome should be identified and how to do it.
Science, Vol 291, Issue 5507, 1221-1224 , 16 February 2001
"A single gene can encode multiple different proteins--these can be produced by alternative splicing of the mRNA transcript, by varying translation start or stop sites, or by frameshifting during which a different set of triplet codons in the mRNA is translated. All of these possibilities result in a proteome estimated to be an order of magnitude more complex than the genome."
The term "proteome" has also been used in the context of subcellular bilogical systems such as viruses.
J Proteome Res. 2002 Nov-Dec;1(6):501-13. "Analysis of the adenovirus type 5 proteome by liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry methods. JWSchmidt 22:10, 28 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Cell proteome vs organism proteome

message: Should something be added about the status/history/etc of the Human Proteome Project?  I'm not familiar enough with it to know how it relates to other things, but it seems a mention here would be appropriate, if only to say what it is not. Jimw338 (talk) 15:50, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Human Proteome Project section? 

message: I think the sentence "The proteome is larger than the genome" is not correct. The genome is not defined as the ensemble of genes, but as all the genetic material of an organism. In humans, the genes represent ~1% of the genome, so I am not sure that the proteome is larger than the genome (probably not).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.146.216.153 (talk) 09:23, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Size and contents
Talk:Princess Eugenie

message: Are we stuck in the 50ies? Since when are women referred to by their husbands name anymore?? 78.55.75.134 (talk) 20:11, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: You may ask the same thing about the "Princess" part too. In any case, please do not pose the same question in two places. Surtsicna (talk) 20:23, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Mrs Jack Brooksbank"?! 

message: There is an RfC on Talk:Charles III#RfC: Inclusion of "Agnatic house" which may relate to this article. Feel free to contribute. Estar8806 (talk) 03:08, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfC on Charles III 

message: The notes state: ""  But this claim is unsourced. The illustration shows what appears to be a crown, not a coronet. Why is this? 86.187.239.160 (talk) 19:59, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It also seems that crosses formy are the same thing as crosses pattee. So not sure which is the more correct term and when. 86.187.239.160 (talk) 22:06, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

text: No, it's just a coronet as it does not have arches. 205.239.40.3 (talk) 08:30, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coat of arms 

message: A discussion is going on at the Commons concerning the copyright status of several coats of arms that are in use on pages related to British royalty. Please feel free to share your comments and input at :commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Coat of arms of Queen Camilla.svg. Thanks. Keivan.fTalk 18:36, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coats of arms and copyright
Talk:Westminster abbey

message: Westminster Abbey was built by Edward the Confessor. It is a national English Shrine. Westminster Abbey's official name is "The Collegiate Church of St. Peter". Westminster Abbey is where many English kings and queens have been buried. Westminster Abbey also offers a choir school, that is avaliable to boy, ages seven to 13. The Choir school has been given collegiate ranks. 
Westminster is an Abbey because it once was a seat of a bishop, but a bishop has only ever served there once.
Westminster also has many historical objects. There are many poet's works, preserved there, the Window of the Battle of Britain, by Hugh Easton, and George II naval sword.
*Alas, we're case-sensitive here. Why not see if any of this belongs in/is missing from the article at Westminster Abbey? -- Nunh-huh 20:58, 28 Mar 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Parrot assembly language

message: Is the parrot virtual machine the same as the parrot assembly language? should this really be a redirict? --Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason 20:57, 2004 Mar 28 (UTC)
:No, compare JVM and Java byte code. porges 07:32, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: ...but it's also used extensively in photographic circles as a shorthand for a camera with manual controls (Program, Aperture-priority, Shutter-priority and Manual). 86.132.136.249 (talk) 16:55, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That redirect was more than four years old. I've converted it to a disambiguation page, and updated it with a few entries. Mindmatrix 19:11, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  PASM redirects here...
Talk:Politics of Cyprus

message: Almost all parties of Cyprus with the exception of the communists and the greens, are described here as nationalist parties. This is POV.
Ron1978 (talk) 19:18, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: POV

message: Non-Aligned movement
This page does not mention Non-Aligned Movement, but the article on it sure does mention Cyprus. What is the current status of this country regarding this organization? --Romanm 21:01, 28 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The CIA uses quotation marks in the World Fact Book, presumably to avoid claims of recognising other regimes.  No need for this on wikipedia.  I also removed 
It should be noted that Mr. Denktash is being "re-elected" as "president" of the "TRNC" (and its predecessor regimes) since time immemorial. Does anybody remember any other Turkish Cypriot president or vice-president?
because of POV    garryq 11:36, 5 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV Changes 
Talk:All the World's a Stage (album)

message: I think it makes the listings too cluttered and besides that none of the other live Rush albums have it so it's also inconsistent.
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS for page move, per discussion below. -GTBacchus(talk) 03:49, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed Track Listing Albums 

message: Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
*Oppose the primary page should be the original (Shakespeare) phrase or a disambiguation page. -- Beardo 04:52, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay Well someone should make that content, rather than a redirect. -Justin (koavf)·T·C·M 15:14, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ATWAS. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 15:26, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "ATWAS" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Vänern

message: Although it looks like a lake, I think it's defined as a inland sea.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.226.156.198 (talk) 12:54, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lake or an inland sea? 

message: There is a usage one sees with both Vänern and Vättern, where the names appear alone, without "Lake".
Is that a traditional style in English, or is it a recent borrowing from Swedish?
Sweden is odd already, since the Kattegat and the Skagerrak lie off her coast. Once again, with those bodies of water, we do not add a qualifying term to the name, like "Strait" or "Sea".
Varlaam (talk) 06:17, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Lake" as part of the name 

message: Alfie Gandon, regarding this edit you made, removing unsourced material is one thing, but removing the infobox, WP:Lead, and sourced material is another, which is why I reverted you here. That edit was also not a minor edit, which is likely why it showed up in my WP:STiki window. Do not mark edits as minor when they are not; see WP:Minor. Also see WP:Preserve.
Hmains and Andy Dingley, I see you in the edit history. Are you watching this article? Any opinion on Alfie Gandon's edit? Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 16:58, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know how that happened, I certainly didn't intend it. Thanks for catching it. Alfie Gandon (talk) 17:02, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blanking 

message: In the introduction it says the average depth is 28 meters while in the Geography section it says 27 meters. Which of these is correct? One of them should be changed, right? Morphior (talk) 22:55, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The depths of the lake are contradictory within the article
Talk:Metric modulation

message: I always thought that this was a technique used in Renaissance/medieval music, but I can't find a reference. Is it labeled differently? I have vague memories from music history of reading through scores from ~1500s where the tempo switched from (e.g.) 3/2 to 4/4 and the score included the ratio. Something like 1 half note = 1 dotted quarter note, or something similar. I've search around but have been unable to find the term for that (if there is one).
--Sstrader (talk) 15:51, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Metric modulation in Renaissance music? 

message: Is this the same terms or different? --A1 (talk) 11:35, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Metric modulation vs Tempo modulation 

message: Brian Ferneyhough's use of metre as a mean to metric modulation should be included here if someone cares to explain what he's up to. Like Metre in 1/5 and such.
--130.241.66.88 (talk) 12:35, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ferneyhough's metric modulation and use of metre