Talk:Salmonellosis

message: I just flagged some conflicting information.  The summary says that symptoms will appear 8 to 72 hours after ingestion of the bacteria, while the symptoms section says 12 to 72 hours.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.190.244.179 (talk) 15:41, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duration of onset after ingestion? 

message: I read a statistic here - http://www.incredibleegg.org/egg-facts/egg-safety/eggs-and-food-safety - which purports to say that salmonella is very rare in eggs. Of course, it's coming from an egg advocacy group, so it's likely to have been presented in the most favorable light possible, if it's even true at all. If this "fact" could be verified, it would make an interesting section for this article about the sources which are most likely to actually produce the disease. Zminer (talk) 16:42, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Likelihood of Salmonella? 

message: What this "Four-inch law" is about? Smart vandalism.
87.226.22.52 11:51, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: yeah it is weird huh? it's on fda.gov so it's legitimate it is just one of those weird laws, like no ice cream on sunday, i know i've seen that somewhere :-D MikelZap (talk) 15:17, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the reference cited, it isn't even a "law" — it's merely a regulation promulgated by the bureaucrats at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, and, therefore, doesn't apply to the average citizen.  Where did the term "Four-Inch Law" originate?  Is it simply a figment of the imagination of the person (Signless) who contributed it to the article?  The cited FDA Web page doesn't use the term anywhere. A search of the Web refers to this regulation variously as "law" and "regulation".  Since it isn't a law, I've changed it to the more accurate term, regulation. —QuicksilverT @ 21:31, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you're mistaking 'law' and 'legislation'. A regulation by an empowered government body has the force of law and is, therefore, a 'law'. 81.141.211.117 (talk) 12:54, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Four-inch law? 

message: http://www.cnn.com/2008/HEALTH/10/05/salmonella.chicken.ap/index.html --24.96.180.121 (talk) 02:48, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New outbreak 

message: I've tagged the incidents section as being heavily biased towards the USA, as only one of the examples comes from outside that country. I'm sure there must have been notable incidents of Salmonellosis prior to 2005 as well. Thryduulf (talk) 14:52, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  US-bias 

message: Cyberbot II has detected links on Salmonellosis which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: local or global
If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locally or globally.
When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags.
Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
*http://newsletter.sgs.com/eNewsletterPro/uploadedimages/000006/sgs-safeguards-16912-multi-country-outbreak-of-salmonella-in-europe-a4-en-12.pdf
*:Triggered by \bsgs\.com\b on the local blacklist
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:15, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blacklisted Links Found on [[Salmonellosis]] 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Salmonellosis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090117202535/http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~dms/a2z-s.html to http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~dms/a2z-s.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:41, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: "Though Salmonella infection is frequently the cause of osteomyelitis in sickle-cell anemia patients, it is not the most common cause; the most common cause remains Staphylococcus infection."
This statement is without reference and seemingly stands in contrast with the multiple sources of literature. Several well-established sources claim that Salmonella is significantly more common than Staphylococcus:
http://www.uptodate.com/contents/bone-and-joint-complications-in-sickle-cell-disease is a secondary source with multiple references establishing this claim. In particular, one that can be accessed by anyone: http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/101/2/296
I suggest rewording the article to reflect this, unless someone can cite more recent or reliable sources.
ByrnemmMD (talk) 20:36, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Osteomyelitis in Sickle Cell Disease: Salmonella vs. S. aureus  

message: :Salmonellosis is an infection caused by Salmonella bacteria. Most people infected with Salmonella develop diarrhea, fever, vomiting, and abdominal cramps 12 to 72 hours after infection. In most cases, the illness lasts four to seven days, and most people recover without treatment.[1] In some cases, the diarrhea may be so severe that the patient becomes dangerously dehydrated and must be hospitalized.
The first sentence could mean that Salmonellosis is one of several potential consequences of the Salmonella bacteria.  The second sentence could then be interpreted as meaning that Salmonella infection normally causes this list of symptoms, but Salmonellosis is something else.  Now, having read through more of the article, I am reasonably confident that this interpretation would be wrong, and it really just means "Salmonellosis is Salmonella  infection, and the symptoms are ...", but I think the text needs rewording to make this clearer. Iapetus (talk) 14:36, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah yes. Reworded. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 03:37, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ambiguous statement in lede