lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Thirty Seconds Over Tokyo

message: I've moved the artilce to "Thirty Seconds Over Tokyo" per a request and this movie  poster:   ·:· Will Beback  ·:· 08:25, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Caps

message: Not only it has its own Wikipedia article, it is also much longer and better referenced than this of the original film here. (It was also much much better written, too.) --Niemti (talk) 21:22, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Again, not the issue, authoritative and verifiable sources was ... FWiW, better written is certainly another "in the eye of the beholder" as even a cursory check, indicated five contextual and stylistic errors in the first paragraph alone. Bzuk (talk) 22:07, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: This article here was really badly written, you know. --Niemti (talk) 22:10, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability of the episode is beyond any question 
Talk:Used Cars

message: ...this article needs work, so I am going to adopt it in a week or 2.
trezjr 22:37, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs work... 
Talk:Doomsday (2008 film)

message: Why this page (Doomsday film) is redirected here? (Saxons) 06:51, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure, and I agree that it should not. I've changed it so it redirects to apocalyptic and post-apocalyptic fiction. Erik (talk | contribs) 12:14, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirection correction please: 

message: This line seems badly placed (edit: or phrased- rephrase??), as no mention of this scam has as yet occurred in the article. ELSchissel (talk) 17:17, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: *Edit 2: Or just mention this later at the point in the plot at which it happens, by which point the scam has, after all, been mentioned, and so we're not breaking chronological flow unnecessarily :) ELSchissel (talk) 17:19, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Hatcher later commits suicide, unable to take much more of his successor's scam." 

message: This was nominated and passed as a Wikipedia Good article? The writing needs work - this site's overall writing quality is actually fairly high still (well, ok, maybe not, I haven't looked that recently) so is that not being taken into account? ELSchissel (talk) 17:21, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gripey comment
Talk:Design for Living

message: Unless anyone objects, I'd like to separate the existing article into two: one on the film, using the relevant info on the present page, and another (much expanded) on the original play. The screen version is so very different from the play that it is, I think, misleading to try to represent them as essentially the same work. Tim riley (talk) 10:49, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it is better to separate them.  -- Ssilvers (talk) 17:08, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

text: Good work! Alas, I cannot add anything to the film article, as I haven't seen the film and can't find much on it in the NC shelf of my bookcases. Coward clearly didn't think much of it from the comment we quote in the article. Tim riley (talk) 18:37, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Play and film 

message: That'll learn me to work from memory. I have just re-read the play and realised that I had telescoped the two scenes of Act III into one. Now remedied. Tim riley (talk) 17:52, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot summary
Talk:The Lives of a Bengal Lancer (film)

message: The line about "Hindu Fruit pickers" does not have a citation. What is more, even if there was a citation, it is extremely unlikely that all the Indian origin people were Hindus. It is misleading. Hindus should be changed to people of Indian ancestry or should be removed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ranban282 (talk • contribs) 19:59, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Citation

message: I have just finished massively improving and expanding this article. I have spent roughly 5 hours of day on it. Because of this, I have re-nominated it for GA status. Jonas Vinther (speak to me!) 00:35, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: 2017 update: a few years have now passed since I started editing this article. It has certainly improved. Although it was promoted to GA-status rather quickly, it failed its A-class review — the step before featured article nomination. I have some time in December to spend on editing Wikipedia articles, but I can't quite decide whether it's worth my time (insolent face). If I end up improving this article once again, I will do my very best to ensure it eventually will reach FA-status. A Christmast gift from me to the community and its readers perhaps? I know for sure I won't have time to be active in the new year. Just in case anyone wondered. Kind regards. Doctor Papa Jones • (Click here to collect your prize!) 08:08, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Septermber 2014 

message: German dictator Adolf Hitler told British Foreign Secretary Lord Halifax in 1937 that one of his favorite films was The Lives of a Bengal Lancer, which he had seen three times.[14] "I like this film because it depicted a handful of Britons holding a continent in thrall. That is how a superior race must behave and the film is a compulsory viewing for the SS."[14][15]
''
I'll try to sort this later. The Ivone Kirkpatrick book does not have a direct quotation from Hitler. And if you read the whole page that includes the anecdote, you discover that Kirkpatrick is actually reporting information he got from one of Hitler's flunkies during Halifax's visit to Berchtesgarden. There is no evidence in the book that Hitler told Halifax this directly. Further, Cliomuse, the website that is also referenced, is a secondary source too and doesn't look reliable to me.
: I have added some Hitler references. The one on Google Books does not have the 102 note available. The rest are taken from the Karl Wilhelm Krause article and I have not verified them. --Error (talk) 01:36, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hitler quotation is not supported by referenced work.
Talk:Meet John Doe

message: Has no one notice that nearly all this article has been copied from internet sites, mainly in word-for-word transcriptions? I have altered all that but invite other editors to help redress the situation. FWIW Bzuk (talk) 22:25, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe Wikipedia may have an internal program that searches for copied text (might be wrong). In any case, you should be aware that a lot of websites copy FROM Wikipedia because it is in the public domain. That is what you may be seeing. Some of those websites copy it automatically, as they are just site set up to display advertising. 5Q5 (talk) 12:06, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyviol

message: Does anyone know what piece of music is playing in the background in the airport lunch-room scene, at about 1 hour 15 minutes into the film, when Gary Cooper is telling Stanwyck that he's beginning to understand the whole "John Doe" idea? I could swear it's "Begin the Beguine," but I can't find a music list for the movie anywhere, or any mention of this recording anywhere on the internet. Does anyone have any ideas? Thanks. Javalava14 (talk) 06:50, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: If it's not Begin the Beguine, I don't know what it could be. Note also that Disney's Hi-Diddle-Dee-Dee is played at least twice. WilliamSommerwerck (talk) 16:43, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Background Music

message: This article says Gary Cooper was in Arsenic and Old Lace. He was not. That's Cary Grant.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 164.114.235.2 (talk) 21:53, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I cannot find any such mention in the article as of this date. It does, however, mention Capra's involvement with the film, so maybe you read the line in the intro wrong. 5Q5 (talk) 12:10, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arsenic and Old Lace? 

message: Great film...eerily topical...but it sure as heck is not a comedy.... user:purplechez, 12/24/16  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.99.147.91 (talk) 15:09, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comedy
Talk:Sorry, Wrong Number

message: What authority can be offered for the assertion in the article that the audience's synpathy goes to Leona? Mine didn't. I don't think it's odd to consider that Leona, her father, and her husband are all unsympathetic, not only because they are manipulative but because their manipulative talents aren't up to realizing the manipulation they aspire to. In fact, I found all the characters un sympathetic. Even the noble Fred Lord is a bit full of himself. I suppose a look at some reviews is in order. John FitzGerald 23:21, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sympathy for Leona? 

message: The radio play is "one of the most popular and oft-repeated plays in the history of radio" (p. 156 of Fifteen American One-Act Plays, ed. by Paul Kozelka.  WSP/Simon and Schuster Pocket Books, 1961).  I think it deserves a separate article.  The 1/2 play first aired on Suspense on May 25, 1943. (http://www.bibalex.org/libraries/newsimages/sorry.pdf)211.225.39.76 (talk) 02:57, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree 12.38.233.34 (talk) 23:32, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Radio play
Talk:Tango & Cash

message: Why was there a section devoted specifically to random fun facts? I can understand that some people may find these interesting but there is no reason for it to be here on a Wikipedia page and I haven't really seen Trivia sections that often on other articles either. Wikipedia is not a "I bet you didn't know this fact" website. Darkknight2149 (talk) 18:15, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why I removed the Trivia section
Talk:Brute Force (1947 film)

message: This article seems to be equally made up of important info and trivia. That should be fixed by expanding the plot and talking about criticism. --Supernumerary 02:55, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Priorities

message: When the camera pans down the row of cells at the end of the film, as it passes the now empty cell that the now dead Burt Lancaster and his buddies were in, there is a cut in the film. The lighting in the cell is slightly different, and the cell door is slightly ajar when the pan continues. I thought that possibly one of the light bulbs in the cell burned out as the shot was being made, but then they would have re-filmed the entire pan. So I assume that after the actors in the first cells had left the location, they decided that they needed to re-shoot, and possibly change, the ending. So they picked up the pan at the empty cell, and did a reasonable although obvious job of it. 
Anyone know what the "real" story is? ( Martin |  talk • contribs  07:58, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "cut" during the ending sequence pan 

message: Something I don't understand in this article. It is a direct quote from Dassin complaining about MGM's interference in the making of this movie. But this movie was made at Universal, not MGM. Am I missing something? Stetsonharry (talk) 14:18, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: MGM?

message: *  ... plot synopsis, review, cast, production credits, awards
Reference available for citing in the article body. Erik (talk) 20:03, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Allmovie 

message: "...Munsey has promised him parole soon."
Was there a scene in which Capt. Munsey made that promise to Gallagher? If so, I missed it. However, I recall a scene in Warden Barnes' office, when Barnes showed Gallagher the order rescinding all parole hearings. Gallagher then expressed his disgust to Barnes, including words to the effect of "you promised me parole soon." --Rich Janis (talk) 04:13, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot 
Talk:Criss Cross (film)

message: The reappraisal section of the article quotes Eddie Muller, who writes: "De Carlo in the parking lot pleading straight to the camera might be noir's defining moment." There is no such scene in the film. The scene in the parking lot (after the scene in the railway station) contains no pleading by De Carlo, and she's never looking straight at the camera. How reliable is Mr. Muller? Edelseider (talk) 11:07, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe Muller is remembering the last scene, when she tries to justify abandoning Steve. Leghorn (talk) 01:27, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: He's remembering badly, because that scene takes place in a room with a window, and she doesn't look straight at the camera either. Film critics, eh? They sure write a load of bollocks.--Edelseider (talk) 05:48, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  De Carlo in the parking lot pleading straight to the camera? 

message: How did Anna end up with all the cash from the robbery? I remember that Steve Thompson specified, when they were planning the robbery, that Anna was to be the one who divided the take according to their agreement. But after Slim double-crossed Steve, and the robbery ended up with an anarchic shoot out, then it doesn't make any sense that they would let Anna have the cash from the robbery, and even less sense that they would let her escape with the cash to an unknown location. If this is a plot hole, then maybe the article should mention it. If there is an explanation, then it should be included in the plot summary.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leghorn (talk • contribs) 01:21, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot Question
Talk:Escape from L.A.

message: It was all personal research and honestly a very biased revue of the bands in the movie's soundtrack.--TylerXKJ 01:28, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sound Track Section 

message: i changed the soundtrack listing a bit. i have the album and it didn't match to what was there (filter? anthrax? SCORPIONS?). i checked amazon and their tracklist matches mine, so i put it up. maybe there are different versions or something? if so, note it up, but as far as i know it's right now. --dan (talk) 02:50, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  soundtrack 

message: Did anybody else notice that this article is out of touch with the film by stating the presidential candidate vaguely supported a catastrophic event in LA as an act of god when the film pretty obviously says he PREDICTED it?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.95.133.68 (talk) 09:39, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: The beginning of the film

message: In EFNY, Pliskin was fitted with a cortex bomb intended to blow off his head if he failed. Pretty sure it was fake, but havent seen that movie in a while. After EFNY, cortex bombs became standard fare in cyberpunk lit.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.113.49.126 (talk) 04:07, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cortex Bomb 

message: Please stop removing the comedy and ridiculous edits. they are true of the film.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.56.98.124 (talk) 21:15, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ridiculous comedy 

message: What is the "predecessor" referred to in the "Box office" section:
 UpDater (talk) 18:26, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Nevermind - I found the reference to the predecessor (Escape from New York) in the 1st paragraph... UpDater (talk) 18:33, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Predecessor? (In "Box Office" Section)
Talk:Breakdown (1997 film)

message: I have not seen the movie, but the plot section obviously abruptly halts. Anyone seen it and willing to finish it? -Not Logged In 2007-01-11
:It's a spoiler :-) Red Ghost 21:42, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unfinished plotline
Talk:Soldier (1998 American film)

message: The talk page has been archived. --CaptainNtheGameMaster (talk) 15:34, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Talk page archived

message: Under "Production >> Development and writing" the article says: When asked if he wrote Soldier as a “side-quel” to Blade Runner that was set in the same universe, Screenwriter David Webb Peoples answered, “No, I never had any thoughts about that.” 
Under "Connection with Blade Runner franchise" the article says: [Screenwriter David Peoples] considers Soldier to be a "spin-off sidequel"-spiritual successor to Blade Runner, seeing both films as existing in a shared fictional universe.
The citations for both are not online, so I cannot verify either. 173.28.148.50 (talk) 21:11, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflicting Side-quel Status
Talk:Dark Blue (film)

message: there is no picture for the movie, and not much of a plot, this movie was pretty good and it dosnt have a big enough wikipedia page in my opinion, if you are reading this, get cracking.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Smokingintherain56 (talk • contribs) 06:13, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture

message: I changed the release date from feb. 21 2002 to 2003. Go to IMDB to verify. I clearly remember going to this movie in 2003.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.25.79.21 (talk) 01:32, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Release Date

message: I cleaned up multiple grammatical and factual errors in the plot section. The errors ranged from referring to Beth as a Det. (she was a Sgt.) to completely missing the fact that Perry wasn't sent by Van Meter to kill the informants (it was an ambush for Perry).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Telarmago (talk • contribs) 01:21, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  The plot summary is longer than the film itself. I implore anyone with the time, to rectify this. I just watched this film on 5USA and thought it was really good. I'm not going to spend any time writing up an re-writing the article on it though. There must be a film buff out there who is up for that. Thedaveformula (talk) 23:19, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The plot section is poorly written.
Talk:Julián Speroni

message: Can somebody source this info :
Speroni became a cult figure due to his cavalier style. He has often attempted to beat 
players using his feet, it doesn't always work and often ends up in an easy goal for the 
other side. It does make for good entertainment, however.
Sadly, however, these antics have cost him a place in the Palace first team, a place which is 
now occupied by Gábor Király.
Lincher 21:22, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source 
Talk:Tron (disambiguation)

message: Can we keep the ridiculous legal threats only in one place instead of all spread out everywhere? There is no reason to have posted that nonsense here. DreamGuy 09:35, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Previously unsectioned comments

message: Extreme-G series of videogames are based on Tron. You can clearly see that the bikes look simular to tron bikes. The reason why it wasn't called tron is Disney owns the trademark. Acclaim Entertainment cleverly found a way around the trademark. And I didn't think 302 bytes mattered! Renegadeviking
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was no consensus to move.  Several people think that the film is not the primary usage, and it is always safer to have the disambiguation page as the main page. —Mets501 (talk) 15:19, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extreme-G 

message: :Add  # Support  or  # Oppose  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.
====Support====
# Support.  I think the film is probably the most common use of this term. — Frecklefoot | Talk 17:10, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: # Support.  I think the film is probably the most common use of this term. — Frecklefoot | Talk 17:10, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Support

message: #Oppose Although only us grey-haired geeks remember that Disney got the name from the TRace ON command. :)  Anyway, seems to me that everything is exactly where it should be, so I really do not see the need for this conversation. This is an encyclopedia, not a reference of popular or most-popular usage. The DAB page provides the best mechanism for complete accuracy. --Bill W. Smith, Jr. 20:46, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Oppose

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Tron (franchise) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 04:15, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: Tonight, I made a number of changes, which I believe virtually all would agree were improvements.
There is, however, one thing about which I am unsure.
Currently, Tron (soundtrack) and Tron: Legacy (soundtrack) are both listed in the Films category.  And, currently, the musical group The Trons are listed under the Other section.
We could, if people think it wise, add a Music category, and move the three of these thereto.  On the other hand, I could easily see people objecting, and saying that since the two soundtracks are are intrinsically connected to the two films, it is necessary to keep them where they are.
So, I wanted to throw the thought out there.  If many people think a music section is a more-appropriate location for these links, feel free to create one; otherwise, I'm content to leave it as it is.
Cheers,
Allixpeeke (talk) 05:15, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Music
Talk:Wyatt Earp (film)

message: Infobox tag has been removed as article already has one.  If you have any problems with this please post a message on my talk page. RWardy 14:22, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox Tag

message: This section is wholly unneeded as it isn't cited, and pretty much only re-states what happens in the film.  The inaccuracies section isn't really needed either, but it is more in keeping with what an article like this would have, plus if it's taken out the article will be pretty bare.  I'm taking out the accuracies section. Levid37 (talk) 08:07, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accuracies Section
Talk:Miracle (2004 film)

message: Given it is based on a true story, this article need a section on truth vs plot by someone who knows it —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.199.140.129 (talk) 11:15, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reality vs Movie 

message: I'd like to see a reaction section. 67.188.172.165 18:53, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reaction

message: The game against the Soviets was not a "semi-final" as the medal round was on a pool basis.  I have removed references to semi-final  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.134.52.72 (talk) 20:06, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taken out references to "Semi-Final" 
Talk:Dreamer (2005 film)

message: I moved the page, because the "Inspired by a true story" part is such a minor part of the film title. 
It's as awkward as the rash of movies a few years ago with titles like:
*Bram Stoker's Dracula
The whole series needs to be re-thought. --Uncle Ed 16:45, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Ulzana's Raid

message: The ending of the page about the 2 versions is incorrect. Both versions differ for ab out 8 min.
91.21.20.89 (talk) 19:02, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. EvergreenFir (talk) 20:30, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 18 September 2016 

message: What is the evidence that the filmmakers intended this film to be "allegorical to the United States participation in the Vietnam War"? 173.88.241.33 (talk) 00:26, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Relationship to the Vietnam War
Talk:The Cassandra Crossing

message: Below information was removed from the article for lacking sourcing for over a year (IMDb is not a reliable source per WP:RS/IMDB). Please feel free to reincorporate into the article with proper references. Doniago (talk) 17:58, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced Material
Talk:Twilight's Last Gleaming

message: This webpage should not be confused with a 2005 movie of the same name (see imdb).   Raymondwinn (talk) 19:37, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Remake

message: This film was released on VHS. --  Gadget850 talk 23:48, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  VHS