Talk:Index of conservation articles

message: Can we get a clear statement of how this relates to list of ecology topics (science) and list of environment topics (health and related policy) and list of sustainable agriculture topics (how to grow food on land without killing it)?  The word conservation is a good conservative one (;-)) so this list should remain, but we need everything on all these lists, and on list of Green party issues, list of ethics topics, list of economics topics, and urban economics, sorted through to get a relatively well-factored set of shorter lists. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.177.103.79 (talk) 20:00, 9 September 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: NPOV where is any discussion of property rights and how lands adjacent to "conserved" areas are being restricted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.209.140.21 (talk) 03:45, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: There's a discussion on what the reference requirements for lists like this one.  The Transhumanist (talk) 01:27, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia talk:Verifiability#Should there be an exception for indexes?]] 

message: move them Anthony Appleyard (talk) 14:23, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Index of statistics articles → List of statistics articles — Most lists are called "List of -".  There are probably other pages that start with "Index of -".  This is to standardize articles and naming. 174.3.98.236 (talk) 11:41, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Index of economics articles which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 11:45, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Index of conservation articles which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 11:45, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Index of statistics articles which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 11:45, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Index of international trade articles which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 11:45, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: Hi, i just wanted to run this by everyone here, or anyone who watches this:  I'd like to add a new page on Anti-whaling activism to this list. Unless there is a better place. I'm currently looking into the Wikiproject links. Thanks. PrBeacon (talk) 09:41, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Conservation of whales is certainly a conservation topic. I have therefore added your article to the list. You have, however, vandals dogging your tracks. I had to rv this article before I could add yours to it. You might want to watch this article for a while to make sure it does not happen again. WP is not a forum for world affairs nor is it a battleground where persons of different views fight for power of expression. It is only an encyclopedia.Dave (talk) 01:34, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: new entry candidate: [[Anti-whaling]]

message: I'm surprised to see no one noticed that in February unregistered users 59.94.147.61 and 173.32.89.182 vandalized this article by blanking out the A's and replacing it with a long, irrelevant, ungrammatical, nonsensical, apparent machine translation of some junk. This is a list not an essay, but we can hardly assume sincerity on the part of the vandals. Whether you are rude, illiterate, highly misintentioned sinceres or as I think vandals, it would be a wonderful thing for all if you stayed off WP and confined your wall-scribbling to your back yard fences, at least until you come to your senses. Meanwhile I have reverted to the last good version, complete in 2009. If I missed any legitimate changes I do apologize. I recommend you legits be watching this article - someone has an axe to grind by messing it up.Dave (talk) 01:27, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It is on my watchlist but it slipped past me for one reason or another. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 02:47, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism

message: I have added conservation community to this list.
Rosenbergwrite (talk) 20:15, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Conservation Community