lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Manatee High School

message: I don't edit much, so I don't know what I'm supposed to do... But nothing on the principals? Nothing on the recent controversy? which?Victuallers (talk) 17:58, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yea, I'm going to compile the teachers and the administration I'll go and put it up in a day or so. I'll also put up the new building information and I'll as Monica (Girl That Got Kicked Out FOr Body Paint) if I can put up some of the info.CrazySain (talk) 15:44, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Stuff 

message: As of today this article has been brought into compliance with the school article guidelines found at WP:SCH/AG.  It would be appreciated if before undertaking an addition to this article you would endeavor to familiarize yourself with them. John from Idegon (talk) 17:08, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: School article guidelines
Talk:Rhinoceros (genus)

message: doodooo!!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:E000:1114:40D0:958B:4F11:12EC:9FD6 (talk) 06:06, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: hemitoxhus or hemitaechus? Or hemiotoechus? Or hemitoechus? Which is the correct form? Eroica (talk) 12:07, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  R. hemitoxhus 
Talk:Runt

message: Why wasn't Charizard mentioned? --69.178.52.50 (talk) 17:31, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: The first line of this article states:
"usually a litter of animals born in multiple births". How can a litter of animals be born in multiple births? The article for litter states: "A litter is the offspring at one birth of ..."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.225.247.4 (talk) 03:00, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: 99.226.249.109 (talk) 18:11, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

text: It's not very clear is it? I'd suggest the one lying down but he looks like a comparable size to the others on the right hand side 92.232.36.159 (talk) 12:42, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled bis]
Talk:Southern white-breasted hedgehog

message: — Assignment last updated by AxolotlGirl24 (talk) 14:04, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Principles of Biology 2
Talk:Heritrix

message: Is archive.org using heritrix to compile its archive? Is there any relation between heritrix and the wayback? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.238.210.3 (talk) 06:18, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heritrix and archive.org 

message: "An Arc file stores multiple archived resources in a single file in order to avoid managing a large number of small files. The file consists of a sequence of URL records, each with a header containing metadata about how the resource was requested followed by the HTTP header and the response. Arc files range between 100 to 600 MB."
That seems like a very arbitrary range.  I have ARC files that are several KB, and I imagine they can get much larger than 600MB.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.240.219.118 (talk) 17:00, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arc file size 
Talk:Syrian elephant

message: The statement "from periods dating between 3 million years BC and 100 years BC.[4]" is referenced by www.tabiattarihi.ege.edu.tr/en/
This WEbsite is offline, but available here:
web.archive.org/web/20140331010257/www.tabiattarihi.ege.edu.tr/en/
But in contrast, it states "which lived 3 million -2000 years ago.". So, there comes the 100-bc statement from??
47.71.17.181 (talk) 12:49, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source unclear 

message: Were these elephants actually native to the Middle East, or were they artificially introduced there? I’ve seen different sources give different answers. And how did they go extinct? 24.150.136.254 (talk) 03:44, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Native or introduced?
Talk:Visagie's golden mole

message: I reverted the recent edits by User:41.213.126.12 because they were direct cut-and-paste copywrite violations from www.animalinfo.org. The info was really good, so I may rewrite it later from the source already used. But first I have to send a warning to the user, since he/she has been inspired to "write" many additions to articles in the same vain. My system always runs incredibly slow, so if anyone reads this, I could use some help in keeping up with said user's edits.Copywrite violations were from here, here, and here. Hamamelis (talk) 20:34, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent reverts
Talk:Whippomorpha

message: Robert J Asher email and Kristofer M Helgen email
BMC Evolutionary Biology 2010, 10:102doi:10.1186/1471-2148-10-102
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/10/102
Whippomorpha is the name of precedence. Thegreyanomaly (talk) 04:49, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stop moving this article 

message: Whales were whales in the early Eocene while the first hippos weren't until the MioceneEricl (talk) 01:17, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: That's fine because there are Pg "anthracotheriids", which are stem-hippos.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 157.182.165.14 (talk) 16:32, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

text: Indeed. Just because the lineages had already split doesn't mean they would necessarily look like their modern forms. Those early whales weren't crown-group whales.dunc 17:18, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: The fossil record shows that this is all BS
Talk:Zooamata

message: I put an unreferenced tag on the article. Who first proposed the clade Zooamata? I had a brief look at Nishihara et al. 2006 (), who seemed to suggest that the term was used in 1999 by Waddell et al. (). Not sure though if Waddell et al. had just proposed the concept, rather than coining the term, or if the term had been used prior to that. The Waddell article is not available free and does not even have a free abstract online. --Mathew5000 (talk) 18:19, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need references
Talk:List of National Historic Landmarks in Iowa

message: Despite the word "List" in the title, this is far more than a mere category list now, so should be rated as an article on scale Stub / Start / B, and then it can go for Featured List class.  See discussion at Talk page of WP:NRHP for criteria for each level.  I am self-rating this article as "Start" because the list of NHLS is complete, there is at least a stub article for each NHL that it covers, and the article otherwise meets proposed criteria for Start. doncram 01:12, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rate this as an ARTICLE not as merely a List
Talk:Eosimias sinensis

message: ‘中华‘ means 'China‘，'曙' means 'dawn' or 'daybreak' and '猿' means 'ape' or 'monkey'.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mar vin kaiser (talk • contribs) 11:02, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  中华曙猿 literally means 'dawn monkey of China‘
Talk:Gigantopithecus bilaspurensis

message: There are four articles about the three species of Gigantopithecus plus an article about the genus Gigantopithecus. There is extremely little information in the fossil record about this genus. At best, each species article duplicates information in the article about the genus. At worst the species articles are stubs or hatracks for speculation about Bigfoot. Lets go ahead and merge all four articles into an improved and expanded single article about the genus, with sub-headings for each named species. - Michael J Swassing (talk) 21:00, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: Merged article Gigantopithecus bilaspurensis to Gigantopithecus. - Michael J Swassing (talk) 05:08, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merged
Talk:Indopithecus

message: Could this, and Gigantopithecus blackii be merged into Gigantopithecus?  both are pretty short and there doesn't seem to be much need for three articles when all could easily fit into a single page.  WLU (talk) 18:49, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: Merged from "Gigantopithecus giganteus" to Gigantopithecus. - Michael J Swassing (talk) 05:18, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merged
Talk:Ape Cognition and Conservation Initiative

message: The website is now defunct... page could do with an update, no mention of panbanisha or troubles in recent years  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.22.73.39 (talk) 19:38, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Update needed
Talk:Massa (gorilla)

message: Guinness had Massa's birth year at 1931 and age at 53 yr 5 mo (suggesting he was born in July, 1931). --Anshelm '77 (talk) 13:31, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The oldest NOW: Jenny, the world's oldest gorilla in captivity celebrated 55th birthday at the Dallas Zoo. Todd Bowsher, curator of the zoo's Wilds of Africa exhibit calls the birthday "a special milestone." The International Species Information System stated that Jenny is the oldest gorilla in its database. Kristen Lukas, curator of conservation and science, Cleveland Metroparks Zoo, Ohio stated that "gorillas in the wild normally would live to age 30 or 35; Of the roughly 360 gorillas in North American zoos, only 4 are over the age of 50. All of them are female.".tv3.co.nz, World's oldest gorilla celebrates 55th birthday gmanews.tv/story, Gorilla celebrates 55th birthday with frozen cake --Florentino floro (talk) 09:24, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Oldest gorilla

message: In his prime, Massa weighed 400lbs. He was strong enough to rip the arm off his handler in the early 1950s.
If something like that actually happened, it should be clearly stated, and more information should be provided.  If it didn't happen, what is the point of mentioning it?  206.53.197.24 (talk) 14:50, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It has been 8 months since I asked what about the point of mentioning that.  Since there was no reaction, I removed the remark. SlowJog (talk) 00:59, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rip arm off? 
Talk:Necrolemur

message: One of the main characters in James Gurney's book Dinotopia: First Flight is a Necrolemur, who can be seen in several of the illustrations. I don't know if it deserves mentioning in the article, but seeing how Necrolemur isn't particularly widely known, I thought it might be worth pointing out. 75.211.54.40 (talk) 20:37, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article was (re)written by a group of palaeontology students and experts, under the guindance of K. Christopher Beard. The articles include: Saxonella, Torrejonia, Navajovius, Archaeolemur, Cantius, Stirtonia (mammal), Rooneyia, Adapis, Afradapis, Necrolemur, Shoshonius, and Victoriapithecus. If you see any issues with this article or the others, do let me know. I am aware that they aren't perfectly formatted (some of the references are a bit wonky), but the content should be solid.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 18:42, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Note on content

message: I noticed that there is no mention of the range, I was keen to know where it lived, and maybe where it had originated from.
Even an estimate of the range would be nice.
I don't recall any other species pages not having at least some mention of the fossil sites/range etc.
Also, is this a possible ancestor of new world monkeys?
I was researching the origins of new world monekeys when I saw mention of the necro lemur.
I thought it was a possible candidate, or one of many?
Thanks. 80.44.60.141 (talk) 00:00, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geography
Talk:Tetra (monkey)

message: sorry but this article is surely wrong. I mean Tetris...? but i daren't edit because i don't know how to revert etc.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.238.190.139 (talk) 23:09, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In the first paragraph it says Tetra was created using the same technique as Dolly the sheep.
I’m the second paragraph under Description, it says the cloning process for Tetra was not the same as Dolly’s; in the monkey case, the embryo was split during prenatal development, while in the sheep case the genetic material was extracted from the cells of an adult.
It seems the phrase about them being the same from the introduction should be changed. Owenjpgallagher (talk) 13:48, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflicting reports related to Dolly
Wikipedia talk:Notability (fiction)/Archive 6

message: I am aware that the rate of growth of this page has slowed significantly recently.  In many ways this is good, as it facilitates reasoned discussion without the need for contributors to check the page every five minutes for the latest responses.  However, it would be unhelpful for discussion to die down so much that consensus for any changes is not able to be established.  
There appears to be considerable support, in principle, for Tjstrf's draft of what he humbly called "a draft of something, maybe this page?", tempered by comments that its tone was not currently suitable for a guideline.  I have attempted to somewhat rewrite and restructure his draft with an intention to make it an acceptable potential wording for WP:FICT.  In doing this I have included some pertinent sections of my earlier proposal, mainly in the "adminstrative" sections around the core clauses, which are Tjstrf's almost verbatim.  I have made no effort to polish the text into a final version: several improvement tags are notably present.  Instead, as a method of furthering co-operation and hence consensus, I would like to request that all editors BE BOLD and edit the wording to improve it to a guideline-standard.  In the process of doing that, I hope we can agree on what, exactly, we want this wording to say.  Happy-melon 16:41, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Combined proposals: new wording 

message: I have proposed that the notability subguidelines be deprecated with the salient points being merged into the main notability guideline and the remaining subguidelines merged & deprecated to essay status. Please join the centralized discussion at Wikipedia talk:Notability#Merge proposal. Vassyana 01:04, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal
Talk:El Limón, Samaná

message: The contents of this page, at the time of creation, where copied (and slightly modified) from the counterpart article on Simple English Wikipedia (El Limón). For licensing reasons, apart from the interwiki link, a copy of edit history of the article is also given below:
    * (cur) (last)  06:48, 4 October 2007 Huji (Talk | changes | block) m (1,540 bytes) (iw) (rollback | undo)
    * (cur) (last) 06:47, 4 October 2007 Huji (Talk | changes | block) (1,494 bytes) (undo)
    * (cur) (last) 01:21, 4 October 2007 Jmarcano (Talk | changes | block) m (1,461 bytes) (Correcting some minor errors) (undo)
    * (cur) (last) 20:16, 3 October 2007 Jmarcano (Talk | changes | block) (1,431 bytes) (Creating this article)
huji—TALK 06:50, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Simple English Wikipedia copying
Talk:Frankfurt U-Bahn

message: The premetro article contained a great deal of original research, and characterized a large number of light-rail or streetcar routes as "premetro" systems for questionable reasons -- like that the light-rail or streetcar system had a short tunneled section.  More recently the premetro article has been scaled back, to only include systems that verifiable authoritative sources have called "premetro" systems.
Unfortunately dozens of questionable incoming links were made to the premetro article, from articles like this one, that didn't supply any references that verified systems like this one had ever been called premetro systems.
I am going to place a  tag next to all questionable claims that provide questionable incoming links to premetro.
If no authoritative references ever called this a "premetro" system that phrase should be removed from this article, link and all.  Geo Swan (talk) 18:03, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: This is the interesting one – the Frankfurt U-Bahn is probably the one system that can definitely be pointed to as a "premetro" system in the "textbook definition" of the term. IOW, Frankfurt's system really does seem to be a Stadtbahn system that has been rather systematically "up-converted" into more of a rapid transit "heavy rail" type of system. (Vienna might be another example of this...) Despite all that, I doubt there's a reference that explicitly refers to Frankfurt's system as a "premetro system". So I find this one to be a tough one, and I don't have any clear suggested course of action on the matter... [shrug] --IJBall (talk) 21:10, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

text: . Removed any reference to "premetro" from the article – upon further reflection, I agree that we would really need a reference characterizing Frankfurt's U-Bahn, specifically, as a "premetro" in order for that to stay in the article. --IJBall (talk) 02:43, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Is this system a "premetro"?

message: I have removed the following section from the article: 
This section was obviously quick internet translation from the German article, but it is such a poor translation that it isn't ready for inclusion in the article. If someone wants to try to tackle a better translation here, in order to put this back into the article, feel free. (I may look into that on my end, but I'm in no hurry on it...) --IJBall (contribs • talk) 23:47, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poorly translated addition to the article from Oct. 2015
Talk:Interstate 795 (North Carolina)

message: I-795 is complete in 2006 in Goldsboro? Why does est say 2007?--Freewayguy Msg USC 01:10, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It may have been completed in 2006, but was it designated in 2006? --MPD T / C 01:58, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Align 

message: Just to put it out there, I don't know how to change this stuff.
The I-795 NC map is outdated as it doesn't show the Future Goldsboro to I-40 Section only the Current Section, I was wondering if someone who knows how to deal with that stuff could add the Future Section.
Qutlook (talk) 21:11, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Custom Map
Talk:World Amateur Chess Championship

message: In the article it says that the championship was discontinued after 1928. However, it seems to be revamped in 1995. I don't have time nor resources to work on this. However, I got some partial results (not always very reliable), so I post them here and hopefully somebody can complete the list and incorporate it in the article:
:
Year     	New #	Old #	Men                   	Women
1995/1996	1    	3    	Brian Johnsson        	
1996/1997	2    	4    	                      	
1997/1998	3    	5    	Viraf Avari           	Rosalind Kieran
1998/1999	4    	6    	Gaguik Oganessian     	Jessie Gilbert
1999/2000	5    	7    	                      	Elaine Rutherford
2000/2001	6    	8    	Bismarck Chaverra     	
2001/2002	7    	9    	Flavio Olivencia      	
2002/2003	8    	10   	                      	
2003/2004	9    	11   	Shabier Bhawoodien    	Daleen Wiid
2004/2005	10   	12   	Farai Mandiza         	Jenine Ellappen
2005/2006	     	     	cancelled             	
2006/2007	11   	13   	Hifad Rachid          	Nirmala Chandrasiri
2007/2008	12   	14   	Alexander Gabriel Duca	
Voorlandt 15:24, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I just added the 1996 winner, now only the silver and bronze medallists of 1996 and 1998 are missing. Sophia91 (talk) 18:57, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: 1995 Revamp

message: This was for 2017 edition There will be separate championships for categories Under-2300, Under-2000 and Under-1700. In each rating section, a separate championship for women shall be organized only if there are at least 10 women entries from at least 2 continents. Otherwise the women’s event will be merged with men (open).  from http://www.crochess.com/?p=10423
This current list is missing categories and women competition (at least information whether or not it was held). Setenzatsu (talk) 18:15, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: There has been three separate categories since 2016 (as I added in the article back in 2016; I haven't took a look at this entry since then) and winners of all categories should be indeed all mentioned. I agree the women's winners should be included, and I think the women's champions should replace the 2nd and 3rd finishers. After all the winners of the women's championships get the champion title, unlike the silver and bronze medalists in the open sections. Sophia91 (talk) 00:10, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  categories
Talk:Amateur Fencers League of America

message: (moved from article to talk page) This article discusses the history and role of the AFLA in American fencing. While legally the AFLA simply changed its name, there were so many other changes in the organization occurring at the same time that the USFA and the AFLA can be more easily discussed in separate articles. — Twisted86 - Talk - at 07:16, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Why this article is separate from [[United States Fencing Association]]
Talk:According to Greta

message: * Hilary Duff gets bratty in 'According to Greta'
* Variety review
* Hilary Duff’s Film “Greta” Changed to “According to Greta”?
* Hilary Duff “Greta” flick details
* 'Greta' starring Hilary Duff: Trailer 
 — Statυs (talk, contribs) 00:27, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Malvalic acid

message: We need an explanation for it's ring instibility due to angle strain.  Currently this acid is being used to flavor foods, it's effects known/unknown we must print.  Cottonseed is not regulated the same way food crops are regulated.  We must know how present it is in processed food. Since organic foods are minimally processed is it present in organic foods that contain conttonseed oil?
eximo 08:24, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

message: This compound is described as toxic, so a short biological activity and/or toxicology section should be added to qualify that claim.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 163.118.168.162 (talk) 17:45, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Toxicology
Talk:CAP Markets

message: In view of the concern expressed that this article constitutes advertising, I'd like to explain its purpose. The 'CAP Markets' are scientifically interesting in that they are early examples of a new sort of social firm - i.e. an organisation that trades in the market but for non-profit purposes. In this case the shops create jobs for disadvantaged (e.g. mentally handicapped or ill) people. They are a good example of what is becoming known as 'social franchising', that is the replication of multiple social firms supported by a common business model. This is an important development in labour market and local development policy, and is a valid object of intellectual curiosity.
There may be legitimate criticisms of the writing style as currently being too 'promotional', for which I apologise. I hope and trust that this will be ironed out as the article receives peer review.
Other notes: sourcing is from the activities of the EU's EQUAL programme, and copyright is mine which I put in the public domain.
Thankyou for your concern for Wikipedia's quality, which consists in its breadth and interconnectedness as well as its accuracy and legality.TobyJ 07:27, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Organic unity

message: This article hides the actual definition of what 'Organic unity' is somewhere well into the third sentence.  It might be nice to refactor the page in such a way that the definition is more prominent and then the supporting material can occur later. 118.90.25.165 (talk) 06:38, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The Reference.com article on organic unity is a copy of this article. All editors/bot operators: please be aware of this, so that the copyright issue doesn't rear its ugly head. Wikipedia is beginning to be cited by reputable websites all across the internet (c.f. DrugBank's inclusion of Wikipedia info). Fuzzform (talk) 21:28, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Definition is buried

message: Good grief, this is a horrendous article that disappears up its own entrails and says virtually nothing about Organic Unity itself! 91.108.91.165 (talk) 06:53, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Says very little

message: This article should be tagged with a notation that it is not reliable and should not be cited. It is not [yet] up to the same standard as most other philosophical entries.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ekachakra (talk • contribs) 13:49, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Unreliable