lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Everolimus

message: Should we move the stuff about Xience V into a new Xience V article ?  If we do it would be easier to expand it without overwhelming this Everolimus article. Rod57 (talk) 00:46, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Xience 

message: I believe that there is an error in the structure shown for everolimus.  I believe that the methyl group on the ethylene bridge between the lactone and the cyclohexyl ring should be in the R configuration (solid wedge).
F. R. Green III (talk) 15:59, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, you're right. I'll correct the structure as soon as possible. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 16:10, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Everolimus Structure 

message: Probably approved also in Europe for advanced renal cell carcinoma. Rod57 (talk) 20:20, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need more on Kidney cancer 

message: ". . . Novartis has completed a successful pilot trial examining its cancer drug everolimus as a potential treatment to reverse immunosenescence, or the gradual deterioration of the immune system that occurs with age and is a major cause of disease and death."
http://www.voanews.com/content/reu-drugmakers-push-boundaries-old-age/2510089.html
(Similar content appeared in the Baltimore Sun for 11/13/2014 in an article headlined "Drugmakers look to push bounds of aging." Couldn't find that online 11/13; sometimes articles from the Sun are posted online a couple of days after their appearance in the hard-copy newspaper.)
Jo3sampl (talk) 13:32, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Novartis investigating use as anti-aging drug 

message: They seem common and often serious so I've added a report from one trial but really it needs a more comprehensive summary eg from some reviews covering a wider range of trials and conditions. - Rod57 (talk) 00:41, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adverse reactions 

message: Just wished to enquire why some brand names are italicized and some bold. Zuke Denvar (talk) 04:19, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Specification on typography 

message: It's a highly significant advancement in medicine, and can cause a 440% lifespan increase in mice and its suggested this is the case for humans too. doi:10.1007/s11357-020-00274-1 p1139. It should be the most significant part of the page in my opinion. It has attention from harvard medical school doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2014.01.001 and its recognised by the ageing institute. this is well worth having a vaccine style rollout with. 141.195.131.11 (talk) 03:18, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Anti-Aging feature of this drug deserves more recognition
Talk:Still Not Getting Any...

message: They wrote the song and didn't like it, so Motley Crue used it for their album, "Red, White And Crue".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wolfinator-x (talk • contribs) 22:36, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: If I Die Tomorrow

message: whats the name of the album mean? SkaterBoy182 (talk) 18:15, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  name 

message: Shouldn't the title of this article be "Still Not Getting Any…" with an ellipsis (…) instead of "Still Not Getting Any..." with three periods (...)? --Yvesnimmo (talk) 00:03, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it shouldn't. There is no reason to use a special character in the page title if it is not necessary. -- Basilicofresco (msg) 12:35, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  title
Talk:Personal Choice Party

message: Would it be accurate to say that this is a libertarian party?  --Delirium 14:42, Oct 14, 2004 (UTC)
It looks pretty much identical to me, but independent of the LP. Anyone know more? Tualha 06:01, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: 2004 comments

message: The links dont work. --Mats33 (talk) 15:01, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  links dont work
Template talk:Wikisourcepar (the)

message: This template should only be used where the Wikipedia article begins with the word "the", which is not a part of the article's name. Examples include King James Version of the Bible (which begins "The King James Version (KJV) is...") and Qur'an (which begins "The Qur'an... is..."). This template should not be used for The War of the Worlds, for instance, because this would result in a duplicity of the word "the". -- Itai 15:03, 14 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Talk:List of anarchist organizations

message: Although United Kingdom/Great Britain is culturally a european country, it is not phisically part of European continent. To be precise it is an island west coast of it. I would say that we should keep Freedom Press in Europe for now, but move it into the separate  section later on (when the list grows). If we consider cultural Europe rather than Europe as a continent, then United States of America should also be merged with Europe. q;-) Beta m (talk)
:Arguably, Europe isn't really a continent, but the area that it is imagined to cover includes the UK. I think that the British Isles are continental islands. Tim Ivorson 10:38, 15 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: UK/Europe relationship
Talk:Metrical Dindshenchas

message: I think a citation is needed for the statement that this is "the major surviving monument of Irish bardic verse". I don't necessarily dispute that assessment outright (not having read the metrical Dindshenchas myself), but I do wonder to what authority it can be attributed, and how many Irish literary scholars would not prefer that that honour go to Táin Bó Cuailgne or Lebor Gabála Éirenn. Cheers, QuartierLatin1968  19:06, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Neither the Táin Bó Cuailgne nor Lebor Gabála Éirenn are written in verse, though both contain verse passages not all of which are Bardic. The Metrical Dindshenchas is entirely in verse and is the only surviving compendium of Irish Bardic verse on this scale. Filiocht | The kettle's on 08:43, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, certainly, I see the distinction. But is "major surviving monument" part your assessment, or somebody else's? I suppose what I'm asking is, should we rephrase that more quantitatively, or cite some particular source? QuartierLatin1968  20:11, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

message: The Metrical Dindshenchas is the edition produced by Edward Gwynn at the turn of the 20th century.  Discussing the whole corpus of Ireland's onomastic poetry in an article entitled Metrical Dindshenchas is like treating Buile Shuibhne and Sweeney Astray as synonymous or confusing Táin Bó Cúailnge with the The Táin as presented by Thomas Kinsella.
I do understand that there is a Prose Dindshenchas, but my understanding is that treating these as two separate bodies of work is a convention born out of Gwynn's publication.  It seems better to discuss them as the Dindshenchas and describe how they are mostly poetry and are accompanied with the prose commentary.
I created an article called Dindshenchas/Dinsenchas before I discovered this curiously-named page.  After discovering this, I added some of the info here to the page I made.
My proposal is that this page be made very short and limited to the discussion of the Gwynn compilation.  I'll make the change in a few days if I hear no objections. –House of Scandal 19:06, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Gwynn
Category talk:Plant families

message: This is an experiment in "slicing" - instead of making categories imitate ToL, this puts all families in Plantae in a single cat. Useful for assessing coverage, common vs Latin names, etc. Stan 15:22, 14 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd suggest moving this to :Category:Flowering plant families to include only Angiosperm families, with conifers, ferns, etc., having their own separate categories - MPF 09:29, 21 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Will each of those have sufficient members to support their own subcats? (I don't know, seems hard to get a straight story on the numbers of plant families in general). Also, I take it that the basic concept of a family category makes sense to you? I'm a little less enthused about this category than initially, because a category can't include monotypic families that are just redirs, so you can't quite use it to find a family whose name is so imperfectly remembered that Google-type searching doesn't return any matches. Stan 14:58, 21 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Stan - take a look over :Category:Conifers and its subcategories and see what you think; I've got that categorised now to my satisfaction. There's a full list of flowering plant families at Wikipedia Tree of Life/Update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group#CLASSIFICATION_OF_FLOWERING_PLANTS; there's plenty of them, though far from all have wiki articles yet - MPF 19:38, 21 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Power Line

message: When I added the notability template on April 6, I did so with the following edit summary, "Is this blog really notable? Article only cites two sources, and I'm having difficulty finding material ABOUT it."  Since then  has done a lot of work on the article, and added a lot of sources.  Today XavierItzm removed the notability tag with the following edit summary, "Putting this one to rest. When your sources include The New York Times, The Boston Globe, CNN, NPR, Time, Politico and The Hill, among others, the goose is cooked."  Now, before I added the notability tag I had seen articles in those sources quoting Powerline (or Power Line - sources spell it both ways), but not articles about Powerline, so I was curious what had been found.
:# - Not in depth coverage of Powerline.  It quotes Powerline, and justifies quoting Powerline by describing it as "a widely-read conservative blog"; but it doesn't constitute significant coverage.
:# - Again, is not significant coverage of Powerline.  Mentions it in passing while quoting it.
:# - Same situation as the first two.
:# - Same as the first three.
:# - Again, no significant coverage of Powerline.
:# - This one comes closer.  But it's still essentially a quote and a brief (one sentence) description of the website rather  than significant coverage.
:# - This seems like an excellent source for this article.  It is in-depth significant coverage in a reliable source.  So here's one. 
:#https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2007/02/016571.php - Not independent, so doesn't contribute to notability, but fine for establishing some general facts.
:#http://web.archive.org/web/20070304000738/http://newsbloggers.aol.com/category/power-line/ - See above; doesn't contribute to notability as not independent, but fine for establishing the fact that AOL included them.
:#https://www.politico.com/news/stories/0607/4483_Page2.html - We're back to failing significant coverage.  It's mentioned on a list of blogs they should talk to.
:#  - not significant coverage
:# - again, this is not significant coverage, even though they are quoted at length in the article, the article is not about them.
:# - This one is interesting.  It is an interview with the bloggers about the impact the blog had on a specific story.  General consensus on Wikipedia (which I disagree with, btw, but that's neither here nor there) is that interviews with article subjects do not contribute to notability as they are not independent. 
:# - Again, not independant.
:# - more coverage of that specific incident.
Now, each of these sources serve a purpose in the article as it stands and I'm not advocating for removing any of them, but the only one that really meets the " in  that are ," requirement of General notability is the article in Time.   Or, as I said in my original edit summary, "I can't find articles about Powerline". ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 17:13, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Analysis of sourcing in the article as of April 16, 2021
Talk:Sealand (disambiguation)

message: This page was created to show the many legitimate uses of the name "Sealand". The existing "Sealand" page presently contains an article only about the so-called "Principality of Sealand", while the entry article page called Principality of Sealand has been redirected to the Sealand page. The existing Sealand page should be redirected to Sealand (disambiguation) and the present contents of the Sealand page should be removed to where they belong on the Principality of Sealand page and the redirect then removed from that page. MPLX/MH 15:31, 14 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: While I sympathise with the general point, don't argue too far.  I doubt too many people call New Zealand "Sealand". jnestorius(talk) 20:03, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The micro-nation

message: Please send the permission to OTRS. Thank you! (BTW: I will tag the images as "no permission", so you have 7 days) --ALE! (talk) 07:31, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Send permission to OTRS 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
----
:Sealand →  – Principality of Sealand is clearly the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Due to Wikipedia's naming pattern for micronations, this article should be redirected to Principality of Sealand and the contents of this page should be moved to Sealand (disambiguation). Seungri400 (talk) 19:42, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 23 March 2023
Talk:Java Runtime Environment

message: Text at the top of the article says it needs to be merged with Java programming language, but didn't find any reasons for it on this talk page. Also didn't find any entry in the Wikipedia:Duplicate articles page. Jay 15:34, 14 Oct 2004 (UTC)

message: This article unfortunately not only is incorrect, but propagates the misconception that to run Java you need Sun Microsystems:  << "Java Runtime Environment, or JRE, is a software bundle from Sun Microsystems that allows a computer system to run a Java application." >>
Sun in effect owns (*note1) the Java specification, but anyone(*note2) can write a Java Runtime implementation. (Note1: ok, sure, there's the JCP, but in reality Sun owns the language.) (Note2: Ok, not anyone; the people writing the implementation have to promise not to break the spec (eg, like Microsoft tried to do) by licensing the spec from Sun -- but that's just the right to implement a virtual machine.)  See List of Java virtual machines for a short(!) list.  Also, of note, are "free" Java implementations (a free as-in-speech) Java implementations that are completely independent of any Sun source, eg, Apache Harmony.  In short: no, the JRE is not a "bundle of software from Sun Microsystems".  (Sorry if this sounds like a rant.) Michael (talk|contrib) 19:15, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: of course, the way sun restrict the spec, only runtimes based on Sun's implementation can get access to the test kit, which is their proof of compliance with the licensing requirements of Java. Without the tests you can't call yourself Java or avoid infringing various software patents. SteveLoughran 20:00, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Java Runtime Environment is NOT "from Sun" 

message: On the sun.com download page, the current version is "Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment 6". The java.com test page wants me to update to "version 6 update 2". My installed version is quite recent (few weeks) but has version number 1.5.0_11. My hunch is that 6 === 1.6, is that right?--87.162.24.126 10:46, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That would be my guess too, but Sun does not seem to outright acknowledge that 1.6 might be the same as 6, and which subversion of 6. FWIW I have just now downloaded what Sun calls the latest version on Vista Home Premium and the Java Control Panel reports version Standard Edition 6, version 1.6.0 (build 1.6.0_02-b06). When I use Netscape Navigator (version 9.0b3) to go to Sun's test page, the test page reports Version: 6 update 2. However, with Firefox 2.0.0.6 Sun's test page reports java.lang.NullPointerException, as others are finding. Maybe Sun or Firefox have not managed to get JRE 6 working with FF2+ under Vista yet? -84.223.117.102 22:51, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Version number confusion 

message: It was strange that the JRE term (the term is very commonly found) would redirect to Java virtual machine which is mostly used by people already knowing what Java is. Is seems better to have some explanation of what is the JRE, and provide the wiki-links there. Hervegirod (talk) 14:42, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed the redirect
Talk:List of Ohio county name etymologies

message: Under the Columbiana entry, this line occurs:
Howe states "Kilbourn, in his 'Gazeteer,' says: 'Columbiana is a fancy name, taken from the names Columbus and Anna'"
I first thought that this line was gibberish, but after deleting it and having someone re-instate it, I realize it isn't completely meaningless. Someone should change way it is written, perhaps even adding the source that this information ACTUALLY appears in, as opposed to a text that cites this information.Acewolf359 14:59, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Difficult to understand

message: Howe's text (ref. #6 in article) describes the following etymology in the Geauga county section:
The name Geauga, or Sheauga, signifies, in the Indian language, raccoon: it was originally applied to Grand river; thus, "Sheauga sepe," i.e. Raccoon River.
I have also found Sheauga mentioned in a separate source: the article in the article 
The Grand River was called Sheauga, or "Raccoon," by the Indians, hence, Geauga County;
Any reason this detail shouldn't be mentioned?  Wanted to discuss before I edited, since this is a featured list. --KeithB 18:50, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geauga county: no mention of word Sheauga, Grand river name? 

message: For my comments about why John Allen should be considered the more reliable origin of the name of Allen County, please see the Discussion page of Allen County, Ohio.
Steve Baskauf 03:41, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming of Allen County 

message: In the "analysis of names" section, what criteria was used for sorting "Indian fighters" from "American Revolutionary War soldiers"? Three names are listed in the "Indian fighter" category: Crawford, Hardin, and Wayne. All three of these soldiers fought Indians, but of course they also fought in the American Revolution. Perhaps they were placed in the "Indian fighter" category because they were more famous for fighting Indians in Ohio than for fighting British troops in the Revolution. If so, then Clark and Logan belong in that category too, because they were primarily Indian fighters. Butler and Darke probably belong in the "Indian fighter" category too, because their claim to fame in Ohio (and thus why counties were named after them) rests with their participation in the Northwest Indian War. —Kevin Myers 01:27, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: —Kevin Myers 14:51, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indian fighter vs. American Revolutionary War soldiers

message: I think that the information suggesting this county was named for John Quincy Adams is so obviously in error that it should be deleted from the list, and simply mentioned in a note as an apparently erroneous piece of information found in one source. It is not plausible that the county would have been named for the sitting President's 30-year-old son, who was at the time serving as U.S. minister to Prussia. --Orlady (talk) 21:43, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Adams County
Talk:Ice Cube

message: Correction: "Johnson, Bill". 95.248.36.163 (talk) 04:50, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Johnson 

message: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ice_Cube
At a 1991 press conference promoting his album Death Certificate, Cube endorsed the Nation of Islam's pseudo-scholarly book The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews, which falsely claims that European Jews dominated the Atlantic slave trade. REMOVE WORD "FALSELY"
He also shared various disproven anti-Semitic conspiracy theories. REMOVE WORD "DISPROVEN" 2601:204:E080:9900:50AA:E297:C9DE:4803 (talk) 05:55, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. sources on The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews seem to support this Cannolis (talk) 07:42, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 6 August 2023 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Not moved. (non-admin closure) Adumbrativus (talk) 17:35, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Ice Cube →  – I think this article should be moved to avoid confusion between Ice Cube and Ice cube. History6042 (talk) 11:54, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 17 August 2023 

message: I just edited up some of Personal Life section. Removed a couple NOTNEWS bits like his favourite movie, and also removed an UNDUE source (Just a court case being filed isn't enough). I'm also not convinced by the quality of the sources being used on this article, removed a couple of the most obviously not RS ones, but someone might need to go through it with a finer comb and check every strong enough claim has a much stronger RS backing it up. 
I don't have a strong opinion on Antisemitism being an entire section on this article, but it definitely needs sources that are known to be unbiased. Otherwise this article falls very short of our WP:BLP policies Soni (talk)  21:07, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is a potential BLP minefield
Talk:McJob

message: I have removed a long-standing unsourced claim (dating from 2007) that Amitai Etzioni coined the term "McJob". The confusion seems to have come from the fact that the OED's first citation of the term is to Etzioni's article, but the OED does not claim that he coined it. Unless a reliable source can be found that makes this claim, it needs to be removed. I also removed some lines that talked about the term being used in other media, which was not sourced. Without citations, this is original research. Retinalsummer (talk) 21:44, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Long-standing unsourced claim that Amitai Etzioni coined the term
Talk:Continental Airlines

message: Hello. Made addition to Flight 603 incident at LAX 3/1/1978 that 2 additional passengers died 3 months later, according to the Wikipedia article about the incident and explanation at bottom of article I think it should be 4 fatalities and 29 seriously injured. Maybe should be changed to the latter.Thank you.2601:581:8500:949C:304C:CD3D:3958:6A95 (talk) 17:30, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Continental Airlines accidents and incidents Flight 603