lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Jan Sanders van Hemessen

message: * Catharina van Hemessen
:Yes that's in there. Johnbod (talk) 18:32, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yep. Missed that.  I was looking for a self-portrait and came across hers instead.  Thanks for working on this. Apparently I created the stub almost 10 yrs ago! --Gaff (talk) 21:28, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: 10 Years!! - frightening! Ceoil (talk) 21:33, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  Looks like I was not the best editor, since not a single reference was provided...  (None were added for several years after).  What are the odds we could build this up to GA status? Is there enough info out there?  --Gaff (talk) 21:48, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

text: Your doing just fine today in that regard. Ceoil (talk) 22:09, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  His daughter
Talk:Jerry Frei

message: Providing information about each of the subject's children's occupations is questionable for privacy purposes. The widow and some of the children are not in the public eye.
"Editors should take particular care when considering whether inclusion of the names of private, living individuals who are not directly involved in an article's topic adds significant value. The presumption in favor of the privacy of family members of articles' subjects and other loosely involved persons without independent notability is correspondingly stronger." Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons
The listing of the son's personal website and all of his books may violate the guideline on an editor's conflict of interest. The son's book titles could be sourced to independent reviews if they must be posted.
"Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a forum for advertising or self-promotion, or a vanity press. As such, it should contain only material that complies with its content policies, and Wikipedians must place the interests of the encyclopedia first. Any editor who gives priority to outside interests may be subject to a conflict of interest.
There are no firm criteria to determine whether a conflict of interest exists, but there are warning signs. Adding material that appears to promote the interests or visibility of an article's author, its author's family members, employer, associates, or their business or personal interests, places the author in a conflict of interest. When editors write to promote their own interests, their contributions often show a characteristic lack of connection to anything the general reader might want to consult as a reference. If you do write an article on an area in which you are personally involved, be sure to write in a neutral tone and cite reliable, third-party published sources, and beware of unintentional bias. Neutral point of view is one of Wikipedia's five pillars.
If other editors suggest that your editing violates Wikipedia's standards, take that advice seriously and consider stepping back, reassessing your edits, and discussing your intentions with the community. In particular, consider whether you are editing tendentiously." Wikipedia:Conflict of interest --Pat (talk) 09:06, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability and conflict of interest
Talk:Area code 603

message: This article currently claims that 7-digit dialing is possible between any two exchanges in New Hampshire solely because NH has a single area code.  While it may have a single area code, this does not mean there is no 11-digit dialing (in-state long-distance) in New Hampshire.  I did a quick websearch that leads me to believe that 603 is like any other area code, and that there is in-state long-distance in New Hampshire.  Does anyone have input on this?Ekips (talk) 23:11, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I live in New Hampshire and have never had to dial area code in state, but I haven't tried to call every possible connection. What websearch led you to believe it? - DavidWBrooks (talk) 00:14, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Statewide 7-digit dialing
Talk:Tomorrow Is My Turn (film)

message: "Tomorrow Is My Turn" is also the title of a Nina Simone song - see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_Put_a_Spell_on_You_(album)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.53.147.89 (talk) 17:44, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Tomorrow Is My Turn" also a song
Talk:Jester Hairston

message: What a fascinating bio!  I just watched him in "In the Heat of the Night" for at least the 18th or 19th time now since 1967, and decided to see if he might have a Wikipedia entry, never imagining that the small dignified fellow playing Endicott's butler had anything more than an obscure acting career.  And not only does it turn out that he had many roles in a variety of TV and cinematic roles, but that acting was only a SIDELINE for this multi-talented musician and composer.  And a founder of the SAG, to boot!  It's unfortunate Hairston didn't hang on a bit longer and reach the century mark, but this sure demonstrates why it's worthwhile to research even the obscure players in every film, for you never know what you might find.  Oh, and Hairston's bit part with Steiger, Portier and Larry Gates (as Endicott), however brief, was extremely nuanced--just notice at how he looks at Steiger and Portier departing, and then turns to his employer and shakes his head in dismay--a silent yet powerful performance from someone who made quite an impact on the arts.   [signed] FLORIDA BRYAN  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.99.22.25 (talk) 07:52, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Jesús Blancornelas

message: Can this be attributed? Word on the street here in Tijuana is that don Jesús died from other complications.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.160.133.6 (talk) 22:59, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, confirmed with reliable sources. Khazar2 (talk) 01:30, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: stomach cancer?

message: This article has been nominated for a DYK.  To review or comment.  7&6=thirteen (☎) 22:46, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: DYK
Talk:Jesús Iglesias

message: They're obviously the same person, so the two articles should definitely be merged. I guess the big question is which name to go with. -- DH85868993 01:03, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge to this page - following the usual convention of using common names with diacritic. Pyrope 11:46, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

text: Merge to this page - As well as Pyrope's comment, "Ricardo" appears to be the guy's middle name, which isn't really necessary. We don't use middle names for other drivers. Bretonbanquet 15:37, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Jigme Phuntsok

message: Should there be mention of Tenzin Zopa's search and apparent finding of Jigme Phuntsok's supposed reincarnation? 24.93.160.31 (talk) 20:13, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Reincarnation
Talk:Girolamo Zanchi

message: This article should be moved and thus renamed: "Girolamo Zanchi." He was an Italian, and there is no compelling reason to refer to him by the English/Latin compromise "Jerome Zanchi"  Gamonetus (talk) 18:55, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Jeronimo Bassano

message: I don't think we can include comments by family members here unfortunately- we have to rely on published sources. Regards Gustav von Humpelschmumpel 21:14, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Family comments

message: Ruffatti may have a stronger case.  I would like to see the documents he references (I read Italian).  Nonetheless, just because you personally want to believe he has a stronger case does not mean there is no difference of views.  In order to keep the article NPOV, you have to present the views of both sides.  David Lasocki has an alternative point of view.  Next time I am in Italy visiting family, I'll head over to Bassano del Grappa and have a look at these famous "alcuni documenti" and see if they are as definitive as you think they are.  In the meanwhile, I'll see if I can get hold of Ruffati's article and find out exactly which documents he cites and why.  Also, just because the head of a certain Jewish society today says someone from 600 years ago was not Jewish does not make it so.  This is merely excludable opinion unless backed up by facts.
--139.80.18.108 22:33, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm afraid I have removed the Rowse claim as I just checked the correspondence and the claim was not made by Rowse at all- merely a letter from Chaim Raphael (in response to Rowse's original piece) speculated that the Bassanos might be Jewish as he knew that there was a flourishing Jewish community around Bassano from the 13th century and he had always "taken it for granted that the Dark Lady was Jewish" (Times, Feb.15th, 1973, pg.19). Gustav von Humpelschmumpel 00:15, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Sorry but there isn't a conspiracy here. I put in the article that Lasocki is Dr. (which you omitted) and it is necesssary to say where McBride is an Associate Professor of you can't just say she is an Associate Professor. You say you don't care whether McBride is persuaded- I think she has a tad more expertise on the matter than you I imagine. Gustav von Humpelschmumpel 02:45, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Absolute nonsense. Gustav von Humpelschmumpel 10:17, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ruffatti

message: This is an article on Bassano - there is no need to document the bios of the reference authors. - Tiswas(t) 15:47, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: So glad we got rid of your friend Gustav, the sock puppet.  Now we can actually edit the article again and don't have to waste time arguing with him.--MoebiusFlip (talk) 01:44, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mini-bios on references 
Talk:Conway Stewart

message: My re-write is now in place.  The section on models from 1990's- present may need some expansion but I am not an expert in this area.
Snibbo 10:44, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Johann Burchard

message: I have removed the following sentence from the article:
Alexander Lee notes that, "The so-called “Banquet of the Chestnuts” ...is, for example, attested only in Burchard’s memoirs, and is not only intrinsically implausible, but was also dismissed as such by many contemporaries.Lee, Alexander. "Were he Borgias Really So Bad?", History Today, 1 October 2013
The author, Alexander Lee, believes there is only one source for the story, which is patently wrong. All reputable scholars have a dispatch by the Florentine Ambassador, Francesco Pepi, written four days after the incident, and a 'letter' written by Silvio Savelli, two weeks after the incident. Lee's title itself is clearly tendentious, as is his reasoning, based on the probability argument.
--Vicedomino (talk) 07:01, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sentence removed from article
Talk:Pollution control

message: What is this page about? We have enough coverage about pollution control. Plus that the control technologies are categorized strangely. The Vindictive 19:09, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Useless article

message: Wiki has articles on Pollution, Air pollution, Water pollution and many, many solid waste articles. Wiki also has :Category:Pollution, :Category:Air pollution, and :Category:Water pollution. We don't need another article such as this one. 
It is simply a shell with absolutely no content other than some external links to books and websites ... with "cleanup tags" to persuade us to try and write an article on a subject already covered in many, many Wikipedia articles and Wikipedia categories.
Failure to delete this shell of an article is a good example of carrying "anti-deletionism" to extremes. - mbeychok 15:55, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is an unneeded and redundant article
Talk:John Casimir of the Palatinate-Simmern

message: :The other one is
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Casimir,_Count_Palatine_of_Lautern
Prignillius (talk) 06:50, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why Two Different Pages? 
Talk:Folk arts of Karnataka

message: I move Dances of Karnataka to this article.  I will be adding info about lot of other artforms too.  However, on second thoughts and to expand the scope of the article even further, I propose to move this article to Performing arts of Karnataka.  What say?  Sarvagnya 19:10, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Move

message: I believe we should present the Folk Arts of Karnataka as a wholistic entity within Karnataka rather than dividing it on geographical lines like Arts of North Karnataka, Arts of Kodagu and so on. That will make the article better, any comments? -- Amarrg 06:35, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No.  I dont have any problem following another approach.  In all my articles, I usually try to get in as much info as possible into the article in some format(whatever strikes me at that moment) and then consider restructuring the article etc.,.  Here also I've done the same and have tried to get all the info I could into the article.  A couple of arts are still left and I will add them pretty soon.  I am open to any ideas of how the article can be restructured.  Sarvagnya 06:48, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Format

message: The lead is to be re-written; article requires copy edit, and citations. I will try to improve the article; others have to join in improvng this article, as it seems to be one of importat articles of the region.Rayabhari (talk) 10:10, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy edit
Talk:Johann Froben

message: Why were the pictures of the church and other pictures of the monument removed?  
These were contextually significant photographs that added knowledge to this page. 
I will be re-editing the page accordingly. 2600:4040:B032:1F00:7482:313E:267E:17E4 (talk) 04:16, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi there, I have removed them as they were mainly of the epitaph and the location of the epitaph in the church. I have now double checked and noticed there actually was an acceptable photograph on commons which was not included in the article before and added this one to the article. That the person of the image removed, really is Froben's relative is WP:OR. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 10:18, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent Edits
Talk:Johann Reuchlin

message: There seems to be some discrepancy (date and place of birth) between the Jewish encyclopedia article and the Britannica?Wolf2191 02:31, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: After years of collecting bounties (donations) and finally working & building, kind of rebuilding of the Johannes Reuchlin Kolleg at the Schlosskirche Pforzheim has come to an end in September 2008. A modern museum has opened bringing to the public life and merits of Johannes Reuchlin. -- The museum is located in the rebuilt Reuchlin Kolleg, a small outbuilding of the Schlosskirche. The building shell / building envelope looks like the original one, showing clearly however, that it is a contemporary rebuilding. Inside they created a small modern 4-level museum showing texts in german and english as well as copies and facsimiles of historical artifacts and documents.
For further details see (german):
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johannes_Reuchlin#Das_neue_Museum_Johannes_Reuchlin
http://www.pforzheim.de/leben-in-pforzheim/kultur-bildung/museen/museum-johannes-reuchlin.html
Since I am not a native speaker and my english is far form being a pleasure to read, I write this as a discussion entry and starting point. If there is interest on the topic for the english-speaking community, please review this and the given URLs, make it more complete and add it as a new section to the article "Johannes Reuchlin". 
The people creating the "content" of the museum translated all info texts to english also to facilitate access for people which do not understand german (or not that well) but do better understand english.
Thank you in advance for improving this content and incorporating it in the article.
Christian Gosch, Pforzheim
85.179.59.25 (talk) 21:51, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Museum "Johannes Reuchlin" opened September 2008 

message: a. It seems the source of this article is some German text copied at face value. Can anyone say what the source is?
b. In any case there are two major sources for material about Johannes Reuchlin: 
Hans-Gert Roloff: Reuchlin, Johannes. In: Neue Deutsche Biographie (NDB). Band 21, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin 2003, , S. 451–453 
And Leopold Zunz - what is his book originally called?    
Thanks פשוט pashute ♫ (talk) 22:17, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps this is it? פשוט pashute ♫ (talk) 22:35, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Theodor de Bry

message: The name of this article is not correct. Johann Theodor de Bry (1561) was the son of Theodor the Bry (1528). See Johann Theodor de Bry at Rijksmuseum AmsterdamArconada 20:04, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Theodor de Bry or Johann Theodor de Bry? 

message: I'm reverting your edits again for the following reasons:
# Saying de Bry is famous for his "fictional depictions of early European expeditions to the Americas" is confusing. It makes it sound like he invented expeditions to the Americas and illustrated them. They were real expeditions, which he produced artistic depictions of.
# Not clear on the intention of the change to "based on accounts or stories by word of mouth of explorers" vs. "based on first-hand observations by explorers". Are you trying to just reword the sentence, or say something materially different (i.e. that his work is based on third-hand accounts?). I think your version of the sentence is less natural.
# Using bold for emphasis is contrary to the manual of style.
Colin M (talk) 21:18, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "fictional depictions" and "first-hand observations" vs. "word of mouth"
Talk:Lazarus Saturday

message: This article mentions that the "fast is somewhat mitigated" on Lazarus Saturday so that wine and oil are allowed. Wine and oil are allowed on every Saturday and Sunday during Great Lent and Holy Week, so this does not point out any special place for Lazarus Saturday.http://goarch.org/chapel/calendar/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.127.93.39 (talk) 04:26, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 
Talk:Acton Main Line railway station

message: No date given. It was probably the first station in the area, so it must have been important in its day. Valetude (talk) 17:55, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: It was in the infobox, but was in an unrecognised parameter pair - . I've moved it to  and also added it to the text. --Redrose64 (talk) 19:01, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of opening?
Talk:Joanna of Austria, Grand Duchess of Tuscany

message: Her mother Anna of Bohemia/Hungary died in childbirth - of complications from Johannas birth. And Johanna died of the same case - fever in childbirth -  in 1578. 
Ressource: German Book, Sabine Weiss, "Kindheit im Hause Habsburg", Tyrolia 2008. A good book. I bought it yesterday and read some interessted chapters. There are so many pictures inside. It's a great book. --AndreaMimi (talk) 00:13, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death 

message: Can someone move this back to Archduchess Joanna of Austria (1547–1578)?  Name of Place is only used for titless royalty in the Middle Ages and Empress and Queen consorts, not for Grand Duchesses, Duchesses, Princesses, or Countess consorts.  Grand Duchesses are only one step above a Duchess. --Queen Elizabeth II's Little Spy (talk) 20:35, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I object. She was not the only woman known as Joanna of Austria and using years of birth and death is not the best way to disambiguate her. Joanna of Austria, Grand Duchess of Tuscany is a much better title than Archduchess Joanna of Austria (1547–1578) because an average reader would recognize her as Grand Duchess of Tuscany more easily than as a woman who lived between 1547 and 1578. If you were going through categories looking for the article about the wife of the Tuscan grand duke Francesco I de' Medici, which title would you find more helpful? I understand why you want the title of archduchess to be included but it's not neccessary and adding it to the present title would create a ridiculously long title, don't you think? Surtsicna (talk) 21:18, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move back to  Archduchess Joanna of Austria (1547–1578)
Talk:Haripad

message: It is not mandatory that every temple be listed.  These two temples were added on 6 April without proper format:  valiyakulagara devi temple and puthenkiriyildevi temple.  Can someone verify their spelling and that they are not already among those listed?  If valid, please do not destroy the list format when adding.  --Bejnar 19:13, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Temples
Talk:HD 69830 d

message: The image in the infobox should not be used as it does not follow the usage guide for the template:
 This template is part of a group of templates that are used to display information about a specific extrasolar planet.
 Images of published planetary properties are preferred where available, especially when they are available from cited publications.
 Artist's conception, regardless of the source, should be avoided.
 Examples of acceptable images include
 * direct images, such as one used for GJ 758 b, in the rare cases where these are available;
 * output of a model that is integral to a cited paper, such as the image used in HD 80606 b;
 * user-generated images that clearly illustrate published properties, such as the size comparisons currently used in GJ 1214 b or Gliese 436 b.
My edits followed these guidelines but were revered by User:MarioProtIV. 
A useful radius comparison to Earth in the relevant section of the article was also removed.
I'm opening discussion as to why ...
--EvenGreenerFish (talk) 09:26, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I would like if the discussion was held here, rather then on all of the other pages. --MarioProtIV (talk/contribs) 11:18, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect Planetbox usage 

message: I suggest this line be removed from extrasolar planet articles. I've so far seen it here and the article about Kepler-90h. The same person must have put it on different articles about jovian planets in the habitable zone. The claim conflicts with everything I know about planetary science. All of the spherical moons of the solar system, with the exception of Triton, are thought to have formed alongside their host planets in a circum-lunar disk. 146.168.31.85 (talk) 09:54, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: However, such moons do not usually form around planets, they would likely have to be captured from afar; e.g., a protoplanet running astray.