Talk:World Anti-Doping Agency

message: The "Criticism" section seems rather, eh, is "petty" the word?  It is not exactly the big lines being criticized.--Per Abrahamsen 16:53, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: it's neccessary since WADA guys are just giving cheap evidence against the use of steroids. --Andersmusician NO 01:57, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm pretty sure the big lines abovementioned are WADA itself and the values it stands for.  109.65.16.89 (talk)
It has been said that we will eventually reach a phase where the general public will be more fit than WADA probed&certified athletes  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.65.16.89 (talk) 23:23, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The critisicm section 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on World Anti-Doping Agency. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090804034843/http://www.hindu.com:80/2009/08/03/stories/2009080357830100.htm to http://www.hindu.com/2009/08/03/stories/2009080357830100.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110515093332/http://sportssupplementreviewer.com:80/2011/05/nfl-could-enlist-wada-testing/ to http://sportssupplementreviewer.com/2011/05/nfl-could-enlist-wada-testing/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:42, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Is it WADA with an 'a' like in 'cat', or the 'a' in 'day'? Or is it spelled out "the W.A.D.A."? Could someone please add this to the intro? Malick78 (talk) 21:52, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  WADA - pronunciation? 

message: "After reviewing the two domains provided by WADA, it was found that the websites' registration and hosting information were consistent with the Russian hacking group Fancy Bears"
Please submit official proof that the Russian group. Need proof, not a hysterical statement, WADA or american bawlers  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dankodrake (talk • contribs) 16:51, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: A citation has been added. Whether or not this "proves" to your satisfaction that the group are Russian I don't know, all us editors can do is provide verifiability, not truth. --LukeSurl t c 20:03, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "russian" hacking group Fancy Bears 

message: See here --167.58.10.101 (talk) 17:35, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Xue Yinxian and massive doping in China 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on World Anti-Doping Agency. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120824032644/http://www.wada-ama.org/rtecontent/document/code_v2009_En.pdf to http://www.wada-ama.org/rtecontent/document/code_v2009_en.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:42, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This section doesn't seem to detail any actual controversy and should be renamed (which I will do if no-one raises any objections). Spike 'em (talk) 13:41, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Done....Spike 'em (talk) 16:27, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Whereabouts" controversy 

message: I'm removing most of the text on the Sun Yang incident.  Reasons:
* Most of it does not have to do with actual criticism of WADA.  It's an accounting of the controversy (and in my opinion, a particularly biased one).  In any case, this controversy is well-covered in the page Sun Yang and need not be repeated here except for a summary.
* It seems most of the criticism of WADA came from Sun Yang and Chinese media.  This has to be made clear.
* Much of the language in the removed text was non neutral or clearly an opinion by the author.  See comments from specific edits I made before the final removal.
DrIdiot (talk) 20:42, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sun Yang incident 

message: The article claims the Convention has 48 signatories, including "the Council of Europe". The CoE can't be a signatory to anything as it's not a country, so I changed this to "all Council of Europe member states" which appears to be correct. But according to the article Council of Europe, there are 47 CoE member states. Add the non-member signatories mentioned here and you get 51, not 48. Unfortunately the CoE website lists only CoE members as signatories, so more sources are needed. Hairy Dude (talk) 17:39, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  CoE Anti-Doping Convention: Number of signatories