Talk:Green Day/Archive 2

message: Looking thru recent revisions, I see that there are lots of reverts. I am finding it very hard to understand what the heck is being reverted! If you revert vandalism (if you have not yet, please read Wikipedia:Vandalism because many users have a false understanding of it) then that is fine, but if you just revert an edit because you don't like that someone removed something you added in, you really need to talk about it on the talk page first because else people might think that it is vandalism. All I know is that I was very confused when I looked at the history.  WIKIPEEDIO 15:47, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confused! 

message: Someone changed the main picture on the article to one that was taken a long time ago (like in the 80's or early 90's). The band looks totally different now, meaning if we kept that new picture the information would be out of date. I reverted it and put the old picture back in. If you have a problem with this, please discuss your rationale below. Thanks, WIKIPEEDIO 16:26, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The recent pic that we have right now (and has been for quite some time) is good. Drdr1989 20:57, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Exactly my point. :) WIKIPEEDIO 02:29, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explanation for removal of picture 

message: I delisted this article for the follwoing reasons:
*This article is extremely light on inline references.  Statements need to be substantiated with references and sources.  for example: "Idiot was noted by critics as far more mature and musically eclectic than the latters and is often cited as their best work to date."
*Additonally, the tone is some spots is fannish.
*Also, the article is still riddled with opinions masquerading as fact.  For example: "some observers were coming to the conclusion that the band was losing relevance, and a decline in popularity followed." OR "By this time, the members were starting their families, and it was becoming apparent that they were maturing as individuals and as a band."  The second one is especially weird since BJA has been married for over a decade, and his oldest kid is 11.  So, his family was already well underway.  The statement needs clarification or substatiation with quotes or something.
The article is not so bad, actually, but doesn't meet good article criteria.--Esprit15d 17:16, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not so sure about that; it reads pretty poorly to me, and I haven't read the whole article prior to today. There is a whole lot of cruft and trivia and unreferenced material in there.  I haven't even got past the "Lookout" section and I'm feeling the urge to start chopping away. --Xinit 19:10, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Delisted as a good article

message: So in the opening sentence we list all the band members along with their positions (i.e. "Billie Joe Armstrong (lead vocal, guitar)" )  And then, we have it again in the sidebox. I think we should only keep the one in the sidebox and drop the ones on the main article so that we could have the opening sentence like "Green Day is a California band consisting of Billie Joe Armstrong, Mike Dirnt and Trè Cool". It would be less awkward. WIKIPEEDIO 01:32, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The instruments

message: Should it be colored green? Just for kicks hehehe... --Howard the Duck 05:34, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template 

message: I have looked at the External Links on the article and have done searched some other sites and can't find anything to corroborate the statement that Green Day has sold over 60 million albums worldwide.--Geoffrey Gibson 22:48, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Citation Needed

message: I've seen music videos from the album Bullet In A Bible for the PSP in stores like Best Buy and wI wanted to know if they have a UMD for American Idiot or if not, have plans for making one. - sasuke-kun27 14:42, 24 June 2006
American Idiot is an album and therefore has no visual content. Bullet in a Bible was a CD/DVD release. The UMD is of the DVD. --AmyRoxYourSox 10:21, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: PSP music videos

message: Green Day can also be considered a skatepunk band due to many of their song being used in skating competitions and on skateboarding video games. Jeromealden 85  16:38, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed it for two reasons, A) this appears to be a made up genre and an article which I may put up for deletion as such, and b) it doesn't even fit into the definition discussed on the talk page for skatepunk which is "Music created by and/or for skaters". Pegasus1138Talk | Contribs | Email ---- 01:05, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Skatepunk 

message: In a recent mass renaming of categories, we renamed nearly every category of Singles by artist into the appropriate subcategory of Songs by artist. We did not immediately rename the few categories in which there was a large number of both singles and non-singles separated, just to make sure there was no absolutely pressing reason that fans of those few acts (the Beach Boys, the Beatles, David Bowie, Green Day, Nirvana, Oasis, Prince, Radiohead) wanted the singles by artist category kept. So one last chance: Does anyone think that :category:Green Day singles shouldn't be merged into :category:Green Day songs, as all the others except the ones listed have? Similarly for :category:Green Day B-sides, any objection there?--Mike Selinker 08:55, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see any issue with changing it. Pegasus1138Talk | Contribs | Email ---- 02:03, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Mass renaming of Singles by artist into Songs by artist

message: The line-up section of the article shows Jason White as an official member of Green Day.  The article contradicts itself, with Jason White official in some places, and just a backing member in other places. --Jordan Elder talk 17:00, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jason White official? 

message: Green Day is one of the most influencial punk bands ever. They have helped redefine and shape the punk scene. You cannot judge them unless you've listened to at least two different albums and/or posses a knowlege of the history they've created. If you have posted any criticizing comments I encourage (and even challenge) you to give them another chance. And if you have made a criticizing comment, only based on the information that the Wikipedia Encyclopedia has displayed, I am inclined to say that you have seriously misjudged one of the greatest bands that the world has ever known.
                                 
                                     ~Samantha
Influential punk? How about The Ramones, Sex Pistols, The Clash, Sonic Youth, The Pixies, Blondie, Iggy and the Stooges, The MC5, Operation Ivy, The Buzzcocks, The Damned, New York Dolls, Subhumans, Dead Kennedys, Black Flag, Circle Jerks, Minor Threat, The Minutemen, etc...
Your comment here seems to serve no purpose but to forward your own opinion. And your opinion seems to be limited by exposure. Theplanetsaturn
Yeah, well said. Who have Green Day influenced? And who is Samatha to say that they are so good?
::All older bands. I can bet you that when Green Day is finally finished with their run then everyone will finally realize how great they are. Green Day is newer and I think people have a problem with letting go of the past and moving forward. These people label Green Day as posers because they come after something else and are helping revive a genre of music. Green Day is one of the most influential bands ever, and I don't ask you to like their music, just see that they are influential and accept that. Orfen 04:45, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, older like Operation Ivy, another Gilman band from the same era as Green Day. So, please show me where I stated that Green Day were NOT influential. Please show me where I labeled Green Day as posers. You cannot. I'm in the East Bay area and I spent a good deal of time at Gilman before and after Green Day arrived. I have nothing but respect for them as musicians. I have nothing but respect for the way they have managed their careers, so spare me the ridiculous "you disagreed so you don't like them" argument. Obviously, they are AN influential band. But only a fool fails to look past the bias of their fandom and recognize that modern popularity does not equate to being the MOST influential. To define something in that way ignores the history of the genre. Without many of the "older" bands, you do not have the sounds of the newer. Who is more influential? Green Day, or the bands that Green Day drew influence from themselves?Theplanetsaturn
I love Green Day to pieces, but dissagree with the statement. I thing they have definately influenced the newer generation of pop punk bands (such as Blink 182 and Sum 41) but I don't think thats enough to be classified as 'one of the most influential punk bands ever.' --AmyRoxYourSox 10:26, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Green Day simply are the best... 

message: Don't know where they came from, but some sound samples have taken place of the album covers I put next to each album. Shouldn't we have a sound sample section? Or maybe just group them together at the end? Scrumshus 00:12, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Mass grouping of sound samples

message: I think the idea to not include the groups genre in the opening paragraph is stupid. To open the article with "Green Day is a band" sounds like something a child would say. Satchfan 13:47, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: beats having something innacurate in the intro which is the alternative since nobody can agree on what genre they are. Pegasus1138Talk | Contribs | Email ---- 20:55, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well that was one reason I changed "band" to "musical group", but I don't know why it got changed back. "Band" just sounds... crap. I'm sorry, I can't think of any other way to put it. Satchfan 02:05, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening Paragraph 

message: Wth all these anonymous vandal edits its hard to get anything done with this article; most of our energy is spent fixing things.  Overall the quality of the page has really plummeted in recent months.  I suggest we place the page under semi-protection for a while.  WesleyDodds 21:26, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. --XXXtylerXXX 04:22, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protection? 

message: Billie Joe says that Green Day is from Oakland....  However, in their earlier years, he always said Berkeley.  Pinole may be the origin of the people, but the band really started out and gained popularity at 924 Gilman St. a club in west Berkeley near the Pyramid brewery, named after its address.  They (probably) live in Oakland, so that seems legitimate though a little depressing, considering what Berkeley did for the band, but Pinole? hell no.
:Like I said, East Bay in general. The band has no specific point of origin, regardless of what anyone, the band included, has claimed.
:And no, they do not live in Oakland. They do not all live in the same city.
I don't know what it's like out in California, so I wouldn't know for sure, but maybe they just use Oakland since it's like a BIG city near where they're from. I would suggest putting Berkeley then, since it seems to have the most significance. Orfen 03:45, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oakland is only big in the geographic sense. It covers a large amount of land. As you say, Berkeley is signifigant, so it would make a certain amount of sense to list it as such. But then we will just continue with people reverting it as they are somehow CERTAIN of the indiscernable point of origin. Again, I would suggest East Bay. The common terminolgy used by residents for geographic location is: East Bay/South Bay/North Bay/San Francisco
I think California is way to general, East Bay helps narrow down the specific place where it is. Until we come to an agreement where that specific place is, I suggest East Bay then. Orfen 03:02, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

text: East Bay. It covers the towns where all of them lived.--XXXtylerXXX 13:36, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  berkeley, oakland, pinole 

message: I have reverted the discography back to the standard links format since turning it into a gallery seems to be both unecessary and also has a large number of images which slow page load time noticeably. Pegasus1138Talk | Contribs | Email ---- 03:19, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The pictures are also present at the main discography article at Green Day discography. Pegasus1138Talk | Contribs | Email ---- 04:40, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I revamped the discography. Many other featured article bands had this formaat, such as The Beatles. Scrumshus 15:06, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discography 

message: Ok.... I'm one of the people who has taken part in this debate as to where Green Day is from...  I've been insisting that Berkeley be listed, but I think the suggestion of East Bay is good enough.  However, I disagree that people refer to South Bay/East Bay/North Bay/San Francisco..... I've lived there, in the East Bay, in Berkeley, and at least Berkeleyans/Berkeleyites say East Bay/South Bay/Marin or Napa depending on which direction (for North Bay)/The City.  People refer to SF as the city, just as New Yorkers refer to Manhattan as The City.
Okay, if anyone listens to 'Minority' on bullet in a bible, during the instrumental parts, billi joe says to the crowd: "We're Green Day from Oaklnad california and I just wanna say that england is now the officila home of Green Day from now on." that last part is just a crowd-pleaser, but according to him, Green Day is from Oakland. And I think he would know. Scrumshus
::I've lived in the East Bay for over three decades. South Bay/East Bay/North Bay/San Francisco is fairly widely used. In fact, I don't know why you're disagreeing as for the most part you follow up your disagreement with an agreement. Yes, it's not 100% universal. Some people in different parts of the Bay Area refer to sections slightly differently (the City/San Fran/SF/San Francisco/ect). But the differences in this instance are not enough to matter, and not in the realm that it affects the point of origin anyway. As far as Billies' claims, Billie says alot of things. Often he contradicts himself on purpose. He can claim that Green Day is from the moon and it will not alter reality. Facts are facts, and while members of Green Day may have lived in Oakland at one point, the band did not form there. There first show was not there. There first rehearsal was not there. The address on the first album was to El Sobrante because that is where Kiffmeyer (who was very much the frontman for the band at the time) lived. The first show was in San Pablo. They are most known for performances in Berkeley (from that era). The members come from all over the Bay Area. Yes, Billie does know. But that does not mean he's telling the truth.Theplanetsaturn
I agree with putting in East Bay as the origin, however, I have always hear Billie say Oakland, California. It sort of sounds a little better too... I just can't hear them saying "we're Green Day from East Bay, California" or something. But I've always heard Oakland from Billie, but I suggest we put East Bay as the origin to not keep the loacation so general. Orfen 02:16, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  origin 

message: Shouldn't we start the article by saying Greenday are a rock trio, because by  saying rock, we are not totally specifying the genre. DavidJJJ 08:16, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've brought this up before, people seem to agree with me, but it keeps getting reverted anyway.  All articles on rock bands specificy genre in the first sentence, and it there's more than one genre that can be applied, the default choice generally is the primary genre, ie pop, jazz, country, etc. instead of the more cumbersome subgenres (in the case of this page, rock).  WesleyDodds 10:48, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: First paragraph

message: Under the backing members sub-section, I added a paragraph about Jason White and his role in the band. I thought it was appropriate as he has a long history with the band and helped them out in studio and concert. There was almost no mention of him previously, and it fits in well with the article. Scrumshus 02:40, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Jason White section

message: Under the 'Other Projects' section, shoulnd't there be a paragraph about Green Day's mysterious stolen album Cigarettes and Valentines?. I mean, it was never released, so I guess it classifies as an 'other project', and we could work in rumors about the band re-doing the album after securing thier popularity with American Idiot. Any oppositions or commetns? Scrumshus 02:40, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cigarettes and Vlanetines

message: I was searching some outdated wikipedia mirror sites when I found one the mirrored the article back when it was a Good Article.  I looked thru and saw it had an awards section, which means that this article used to have an awards section. I was thinking of putting it up. Here's what I came up with:
===Awards===
====1995====
Grammy Awards of 1995
#Alternative Music Performance (Dookie)
====1998====
5th annual Kerrang! Rock Awards
#Best Live Performance (nimrod.)
MTV Video Music Awards
#Best Alternative Video (Good Riddance)
====2001====
California Music Awards
#Outstanding Album (Warning:)
#Outstanding Punk Rock/Ska Album
#Outstanding Group
#Outstanding Male Vocalist
#Outstanding Bassist
#Outstanding Drummer
#Outstanding Songwriter (Billie Joe Armstrong)
#Outstanding Artist
8th annual Kerrang! Rock Awards
#Classic Songwriter (Warning:)
====2005====
Grammy Awards of 2005
#Best Rock Album (]]American Idiot (album)|american Idiot]])
12th annual Kerrang! Rock Awards
#Best Band on the Planet (American Idiot)
#Best Live Act
MTV Video Music Awards 
#Video of the year (Boulevard of Broken Dreams)
#Viewer's Choice
#Best Rock Video
#Best Group Video
#Best Direction
#Best Editing
#Best Cinematography
#(Nominated) Best Art Direction
MuchMusic Video Awards
#(Nominated) Best International Video - Group" (American Idiot and Boulevard Of Broken Dreams).
#People’s Choice: Favourite International Group - (Boulevard Of Broken Dreams)
====2006====
Grammy Awards of 2006
#Record of the Year (Boulevard of Broken Dreams)
People's Choice Awards
#Favorite Group
Nickelodeon's Kids Choice Awards
#Favorite Musical Group
#Favorite Song (Wake Me Up When September Ends)
Should we add it to the article? It would be helpful if we wanted to make it a Good Article again. Scrumshus 03:23, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I did a quick look at some feature band articles, and they don't seem to have lists of awards.  Looks like all major awards are mentioned in the prose of the article rather than listed.  WesleyDodds 03:49, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: So what your'e saying is that we should fit in the awards to certain albums into the album's mini-section instead of one big list? That could work. I'll go ahead and work in the album's awards with each respective ablum. Scrumshus 16:34, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I found the original source, now we know it's legit.  Scrumshus 14:05, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Awards

message: ====1995====
Grammy Awards of 1995
#Alternative Music Performance (Dookie)
====1998====
5th annual Kerrang! Rock Awards
#Best Live Performance (nimrod.)
MTV Video Music Awards
#Best Alternative Video (Good Riddance)
====2001====
California Music Awards
#Outstanding Album (Warning:)
#Outstanding Punk Rock/Ska Album
#Outstanding Group
#Outstanding Male Vocalist
#Outstanding Bassist
#Outstanding Drummer
#Outstanding Songwriter (Billie Joe Armstrong)
#Outstanding Artist
8th annual Kerrang! Rock Awards
#Classic Songwriter (Warning:)
====2005====
Grammy Awards of 2005
#Best Rock Album (]]American Idiot (album)|american Idiot]])
12th annual Kerrang! Rock Awards
#Best Band on the Planet (American Idiot)
#Best Live Act
MTV Video Music Awards 
#Video of the year (Boulevard of Broken Dreams)
#Viewer's Choice
#Best Rock Video
#Best Group Video
#Best Direction
#Best Editing
#Best Cinematography
#(Nominated) Best Art Direction
MuchMusic Video Awards
#(Nominated) Best International Video - Group" (American Idiot and Boulevard Of Broken Dreams).
#People’s Choice: Favourite International Group - (Boulevard Of Broken Dreams)
====2006====
Grammy Awards of 2006
#Record of the Year (Boulevard of Broken Dreams)
People's Choice Awards
#Favorite Group
Nickelodeon's Kids Choice Awards
#Favorite Musical Group
#Favorite Song (Wake Me Up When September Ends)
Should we add it to the article? It would be helpful if we wanted to make it a Good Article again. Scrumshus 03:23, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I did a quick look at some feature band articles, and they don't seem to have lists of awards.  Looks like all major awards are mentioned in the prose of the article rather than listed.  WesleyDodds 03:49, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: So what your'e saying is that we should fit in the awards to certain albums into the album's mini-section instead of one big list? That could work. I'll go ahead and work in the album's awards with each respective ablum. Scrumshus 16:34, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I found the original source, now we know it's legit.  Scrumshus 14:05, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Awards

message: Grammy Awards of 2006
#Record of the Year (Boulevard of Broken Dreams)
People's Choice Awards
#Favorite Group
Nickelodeon's Kids Choice Awards
#Favorite Musical Group
#Favorite Song (Wake Me Up When September Ends)
Should we add it to the article? It would be helpful if we wanted to make it a Good Article again. Scrumshus 03:23, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I did a quick look at some feature band articles, and they don't seem to have lists of awards.  Looks like all major awards are mentioned in the prose of the article rather than listed.  WesleyDodds 03:49, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: So what your'e saying is that we should fit in the awards to certain albums into the album's mini-section instead of one big list? That could work. I'll go ahead and work in the album's awards with each respective ablum. Scrumshus 16:34, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I found the original source, now we know it's legit.  Scrumshus 14:05, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 2006

message: If there is one problem with this article it is the photos. THe only photos aer album covers. I put in an early shot of the band to go along with 'Formation and Lookout Years'. I think we should place a photo of each band members face much like they do in The Beatles (which is a featured article) and maybe throw in like one or two album covers. PLus, I put the album covers in the Discograpy section, so we can totally replaces them with images of the band or concert photos, or posters or something. Maybe magazine covers. I think this srticle used to have magazine covers. I'll try to find some. There are simply too much photos. It distracts the article from the actual content. I'm replacing some and getting rid of some. Scrumshus 19:58, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Photos

message: I was reading why Green Day's featured article nomination failed. A suggestion was "Most of the article is in the 'history' section. Maybe add a 'Musical Style' or 'Lyrics' section." So I did. I also inmprted som enew song samples, because there weren't enough. I added Good Riddance, Warning, Prosthetic Head, minority, and android. Edit it all you want, but don't delete it. I worked VERY hard on it. Any suggestions to improve it are welcome. I am also going to add a "See also" section, beacuse virtually every other article has it and this one doesn't. Scrumshus 23:24, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll write the musical style section.  WesleyDodds 23:30, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Musical Style

message: I think we should include some citations for the criticism, because then it could be considered original research. Most of the criticism doesn't seem like it's based on fact though, but is based more on opinion. Orfen 18:10, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Criticism Citations

message: I was browsing Wikipedia when I came Just Friends (2005 film) WTF? Not only have I never heard of "just Friends" This is just the green day page with a reworked first sentence and some faulty links! Talk about your vandalsim! I SERIOUSLY think an admin should get down here and delete that piece of plagurised crap. NOW! Scrumshus 01:37, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: We need an admin...'''NOW!!!'''

message: Can someone cite those sales figures in the first paragraph?  I have no idea where those numbers come from, and it's essential that we cite them.  WesleyDodds 12:06, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The link on the Discography page doesn't seem to work anymore. WesleyDodds 11:39, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The site is under some contruction, but you'll see once it's back up. Also, check out the table above in the 'Citation Needed' section of this talk page. Scrumshus 13:35, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Looke this  this link says that American IDiot has sold 8 million copies in the U.S., as well as 4 million digital albums, and 22 million copies worldwide. I think this is completely made up from an unreiabel source. Any other views? Scrumshus 13:42, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: About Insomniac's sales status, it is now confrimed  that the album has sold over 3 million copies in the US, instead of the previous figure of 2 million, bringing it's worldwide status to 9 million. So much for being a low-selling follow up! Scrumshus 21:55, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Green Day's sales 

message: what album is closing time on? cause i cant find it
Closing Time is by Semisonic not Green Day, the album is called feeling strangely fine BradK 10:46, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  closing time 

message: WOW! According to this link:  Metatraffic reports that Green Day sold almost 8 million copies of American Idiot in the US alone! Time for the riaa to catch-up... Scrumshus 17:41, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: American Idiot sales status

message: Shouldn't we include a section about Green Day's live performances? Maybe get a posititve concert review online and use it as a reference, and write about live staples and what generally happens? We could go much farther into the Milton Keyes concert that was filmed for Bullet in a Bible. It couldn't hurt to use it to make this article into a Good Article. Ṣ₡ЯՄՊՏɧѱᎦ ☎/ ∑
:If anything I think it should be in the Bullet in a Bible article. Since their live performances changed with each album it would be hard to say. But I think this article should be for more about the band and their music instead of live performances. Orfen 20:40, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I guess so. But shouldn't we include a little bit of live staples and such? Ṣ₡ЯՄՊՏɧѱᎦ ☎/ ∑ 21:09, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Concerts

message: I changed the route of "East Bay" in the origin to go directly to the East Bay page, instead of the disambiguation. Stonesour025 20:11, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: East Bay

message: I haven't even read the entire article, but honestly, it was reading pretty well so far. But there is no way this article can be promoted, because it has massive image issues.
*:Image:Normal gd014cb.jpg - no source information
*:Image:Greendayold.jpg - disputed liscencing
*:Image:Trecoolphoto.jpg - no source information or fair use rationale
*:Image:Dirnt.jpg - no source information or fair use rationale
*:Image:Wakemeuppromoshot.jpg - no fair use rationale
*:Image:Aimovie.jpg - improperly tagged, and actually should be deleted
*Additionally, many of the album covers don't have fair use rationales.
Great work so far, but more work needed.--Esprit15d 13:07, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Failed good article nomination