lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Kembuchi Station

message: I created this outline article to turn red links blue.  I plan to continue working on it in the future.  The goal was to get at least a starter article going for stations that don't have one at all.  If the English is bad, please fix it.  Thanks.  Hosikawafuzi 15:45, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Creation of the Article
Talk:Kita-Kembuchi Station

message: I created this outline article to turn red links blue.  I plan to continue working on it in the future.  The goal was to get at least a starter article going for stations that don't have one at all.  If the English is bad, please fix it.  Thanks.  Hosikawafuzi 15:51, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Creation of the Article
Talk:Beneficial ownership

message: I propose to merge Beneficial owner into Beneficial ownership. Clearly the same concept. -- P 1 9 9  ✉ 12:57, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd say this indicates consensus. Anyone can carry out the merge. I don't have enough knowledge of the article's topic to do a decent job, I don't think. Joyous! | Talk 00:39, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

text: Klbrain (talk) 13:59, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge proposal
Talk:St Boniface's Church, Bunbury

message: Sir George Beeston's reputed age is discussed in his biography in The History of Parliament (Volume 1558-1603) (he was MP for Cheshire 1589). The inquisition post mortem following his father's death and George's own succession to his estates in 1542 declares him to be only 22 years old, suggesting a likely birth year of 1520 (which still predates institution of parish registers)and an age at death of only 81 or 82 in 1602. The legend he was 102 at his death is based on his epitaph, according to George Ormerod in his History of Cheshire (first published 1819), though it was widespread and persistent enough to find itself being cited by Nikolaus Pevsner and the guidebook writers in the 20th century. I will qualify the statements with 'reputedly' and 'his memorial states' as well as incorporate footnote information cited to the HOP article.
I notice that the inscription reproduced here misses out the detail of ages, with a female relative's stated as '[refer below]'. It would be helpful if someone who has access to a full copy or has actually seen it (I saw it in 1990s but did not transcribe it) could put them in if indeed they are mentioned. I note the linked pdf citation to an article (published after end of WWI) in a historical society magazine translates from Latin his stated age as '99th year' and his wife's her '86th year'.Cloptonson (talk) 07:39, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: For it's worth I've added a photo of Sir George's tomb that I took in 2006.  Also the church guide says he was 89 at death, not 88, so I've changed that and added a ref.  Don't know if that helps. --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 11:31, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Reputed age of Sir George Beeston
Talk:Rubber seed oil

message: Hi dear people,
I tried to correct some typos etc., but someone should have another look. I do not know, for instance, if the part where I put the "clarify"-brackets is the company's name or what...  
and the sentence about timber should be completely removed and transferred to the article about the tree, but with its references - I hope someone else than me can do that... 
94.134.203.232 (talk) 15:15, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  wood belongs into another article
Talk:Frederick C. Leonard

message: I've contributed significant references and some text recently.
I knew Dr. Leonard from about 1950 to his death in 1960 (I was a child). I continue to be a friend of the family.
I am aware of Wikipedia's policies on Conflict of Interest and will do my best to be neutral. If you have any concerns, please leave a message here or on my talk page. Regards, Ariconte (talk) (Email me) 10:32, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: You should be greatly respected for your honesty. As long as the content meets all the normal Neutral point of view guidelines, there should be absolutely no problem there. fredgandt 01:57, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: My contributions to this page

message: I've edited some minor parts for grammar and clarity.  I'm not an astronomer, so I have a couple of questions on the content:
I renamed the section to 'Kuiper Belt hypothesis' as I presume there's only one of them?  If there was more than one Kuiper Belt hypothesis, we would use the plural 'hypotheses'.  Also, is the term 'trans-Neptunian' or 'ultra-Neptunian' - the source uses the latter?
It is unclear in the source whether the three 'prize pupils' of Leonard who directed planetariums were recipients of the Leonard medal, or were his 'best' pupils.  If the latter, I'd replace 'prize' with 'best'.  I think it would also be good to name them (Ron Hartman, Ron Oriti and O. Richard Norton?).
pgbrown (talk)  11:20, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I think 'best' is right for the pupils; I'll check the Leonard medal list. I just copied the Kuiper stuff ... I would suppose there are several but will check.  Thanks for looking at it, Ariconte (talk) 18:51, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor edits
Talk:East Lancs Myllennium Vyking

message: This article is not currently at its best. This is because the web archive service I have used previously is out of use temporarily, limiting infomation I can find. The article will have more information and an infobox in due course. -- Arriva436 16:09, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: . I improved it ages ago, but have only just come across this message again! Arriva436talk 10:39, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Article to be improved

message: I propose to merge the contents of this page into East Lancs Vyking as the products are referred to as 'Vyking' officially. This page only talks about the facelift variant of the 'Vyking' bus, so I don't know why they are separate pages. This bus, East Lancs Nordic also has its facelift version as a heading in the page, where the product is made by the same company as the 'Vyking'.
Here is the page containing the original Vyking on their website: https://web.archive.org/web/20011220003345/http://elcb.co.uk/products.html
And here is the updated page containing the new Vyking facelift: https://web.archive.org/web/20041010040309/http://www.elcb.co.uk/products.html 
Let me know what you think because I also believe the same should be done for East Lancs Myllennium Lolyne which should be merged into East Lancs Lolyne which would help the pages to hold their weight more as there aren't any news articles or books (as far as I'm aware) to use as reference evidence for the pages as both the 'East Lancs Vyking' and the 'East Lancs Lolyne' don't have any references where as their facelift's pages do have them. NHPluto (talk) 13:27, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: for this one. Klbrain (talk) 15:35, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'd also support the merge for the Lolyne articles too, for the same reasons. Klbrain (talk) 15:35, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks for that, I have also created a page merger request on those pages as well with a talk section. I wasn't sure someone would ever read these talk pages hence why I didn't already create the merge request for the Lolyne buses.NHPluto (talk) 19:30, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Pages
Talk:East Lancs Myllennium Lolyne

message: This article is not currently at its best. This is because the web archive service I have ued previously is out of use temporarily, limiting infomation I can find. The article will have more information and an infobox in due course. -- Arriva436 16:15, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ages ago, I've only just come across this message again. Arriva436talk 10:40, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Article to be improved
Talk:Enfield Automotive

message: Because of the largely unfixed issues with this article, I did a complete rewrite of it today.  I removed a good deal of the images, including the image gallery.  I removed a lot of what still appeared to be a lot of unsourced conjecture and original research.  I corrected grammar where and when I could and tried to assimilate the disjointed nature of the article into a better flow and read.  Perhaps presumptuously, I've also archived the talk page, because of all the superfluous information that has been added here.  I expect to receive comments about this, but I would prefer to receive them here.  Remember that this article is and should be about Enfield Automotive.  It is not about big oil or politics.  I'm aware that Matt was going to help out with this, but I'm also aware that he's gone on a wikibreak.  I am not going to debate policy, but I would be glad to help with the addition of any material that I removed, so long as it is germane to the article, verifably sourced and readable.  Into The Fray T/C 21:05, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite

message: This BBC article, |The Enfield Thunderbolt: An electric car before its time by Dave Prest from BBC Radio 4, seems to contain information which may conflict with parts of this article. I don't feel suitably knowledgeable about this topic to do more edits! Would appreciate it if another editor with more appropriate knowledge could bring their understanding.
EmyP (talk) 10:31, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: More information
Talk:London Buses route 100

message: Could someone please fill in the history section? I would really appreciate it. Thanks. --Wikimaniac3651 16:29, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: History
Talk:William I, Lord of Douglas

message: Brendan, missed the birth of this article but have a couple of bits of info.  From The Registry of Moray, I note that in 1226 Erkenbaldo de Duglas witnessed a document at Elgin and he is described as Erkenbaldo de Duglas fratre quondam Bricii episcope which I translate as Archibald of Duglas, brother of the late Bishop Brice.  However my main point regards Alexander;  again the RoM mentions Alexander (Alexandro de Duglas) a fair bit but almost always as as vicecomite de Elgin, ie Sheriff of Elgin.  From memory (because I can't find it at the moment) Alexander is mentioned as a canon once - maybe more - so could it be that he held as his main job, the sheriffdom but that his brother Bricius gave him prebendary as a "family gift"? --Bill Reid | Talk 16:33, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Alexander de Duglas
Talk:Radio Nordzee

message: Let me know of problems, please--Konalgia911 16:34, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This ain't proper Dutch: it's Radio Noordzee, so this item may better be omitted. 2NG (talk) 19:47, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

text: Upon a second look on this Wikipedia I noticed Radio Nordzee had been the proposed name of the pirate radio station that finally decided to go on air under its name Radio Delmare. 2NG (talk) 20:45, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Carl Hubbs

message: Please help. I have limited tech knowledge. Change Carl Hubbs to Carl L. Hubbs in the heading so that it matches the many Wikipedia pages where he shows.  Otherwise we could end up with 2 pages. I am doing research so that I can cite references for this mans achievments.Jtmilesmmr 16:43, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Using Google I found only one Carl Hubbs article on Wikipedia where he wasn't linked (Beebe's monster), and added a link from there to here. I also changed the redirect page so that clicking on the 'Hubbs' beaked whale' link went to the main Hubb's beaked whale article, rather than the 'Mesoplodont whale' article. Other than that, things seem to look OK, although if there are new Carl Hubbs entries created of different people, a disambiguation page can be added and this article moved to Carl L. Hubbs. Michael Devore 22:01, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:William Corkine

message: Adding these here so they don't get lost (I don't know how to add a commons link):
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:William_Corkine_first_book_of_ayres_cover.jpg
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:William_Corkine_first_book_of_ayres_inside.jpg
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:William_Corkine_second_book_of_ayres_cover.jpg
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:William_Corkine_second_book_of_ayres_inside.jpg
Lethesl 16:52, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images
Talk:Million years ago

message: Please see Talk:Mya (unit) for ongoing discussion re this article.LeadSongDog 16:55, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The usage of "present" here conflicts with the similar and very often confusing usage in radioactive dating, where "present" is fixed to 1950 "AD". Thus, we today would live in the year 64 "after (that simplistically defined) present".  Regrettably, too many writers are unaware of that conflict. 93.199.20.131 (talk) 06:12, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "present" 

message: i found http://www.geosociety.org/gsatoday/archive/22/2/article/i1052-5173-22-2-28.htm at the same site, but haven't found anything (pertinent) by Mozley.  TheNuszAbides (talk) 10:16, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  dead Reference link 

message: This brief article is somewhat confusing in its current form and seems to contain some unsourced musings Geopersona (talk) 17:56, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Stubbornly refusing any scientific standard, English "scientists" confuse everything to everybody. BTW, "BP" is NOT "ago", but a term that is and must be reserved for radiocarbon dating and only in this relation means "raw/uncalibrated (Libby-) years before 1950). I wonder when eventually these "scientists" will grasp that. Even in that case one wonders, why not make it perfectly clear and write BNF for "before 1950", if meaning exactly that. Better are the European Iceberg publications from the Danish University, who clearly and unambiguously write b2k for "before the year 2000". That and only that is perfectly clear!! Thank You.95.90.202.103 (talk) 05:14, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing 

message: Hi. I just came to this article from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:Human_timeline and thought to contribute by suggesting that charts like these are added to the article since they give a sense of perspective over the units.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:6000:1605:2298:998C:FB42:3ACF:782E (talk) 03:46, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add Charts 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Vpab15 (talk) 16:07, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Myr →  – (not opposed to Mya (unit) alternative) Feels obvious why this title is inadequate, but just in case:  gets twice the Google Scholar hits of , and mya (unit) and million years ago impressively already channel 80% of the views here. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 04:39, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 25 February 2024
Talk:Chlorospingus

message: I have removed chlorospingus as an English name, as I am unaware of anyone having suggested this. Yes, they are unlikely to be members of Thraupidae, but that's no different to the many other species where the name doesn't reflect the actual relationships, and while some of these have been renamed, a large percentage have not. It is worth mentioning that following the massive changes among Thraupidae, it has been suggested that "tanager" should be used as a name for a morphotype rather than a monophylogenetic group (similar to the use of sparrow). If anyone has a reference where chlorospingus is suggested in the common name instead of bush-tanager (it certainly is an interesting idea), feel free to re-add it. Otherwise it is problematic due to Wikipedia:No original research. Rabo3 (talk) 14:24, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: English name
Talk:Bya

message: For ongoing discussion of this and related articles please see Talk:mya (unit)LeadSongDog 16:59, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: ÷  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 181.1.246.214 (talk) 20:49, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  4355d4foDFGHJKLÑQW4567890¡WIOPHURI8W
Talk:Captain Scarlet

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Not moved. There is no consensus to move here and this request is in essence the same one rejected earlier this month.   Calidum 15:21, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Captain Scarlet →  – 
#Move :Captain Scarlet to  
#Redirect :Captain Scarlet to :Captain Scarlet and the Mysterons
Revised proposal, as suggested above by user:Ortizesp and which was not opposed. As long as there is no article covering the franchise as a whole, a redirect from Captain Scarlet to the original series (with a  hatnote there) would be the best outcome. The location of a disambiguation page at Captain Scarlet currently causes a problem for naming the category after the general topic i.e. :Category:Captain Scarlet (see Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2020_June_3#Category:Mario_(franchise)). – Fayenatic London 10:38, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 20 June 2020
Talk:Stuffed peppers

message: previously this article was just about the American version of Stuffed peppers. I have made the article about Stuffed peppers from all around the world now..  but it still need more fixing and cleaning up from food experts. Acidburn24m 17:07, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  help needed 

message: May seem an odd question, but I'm from an area where these aren't popular, and I'm yet to see someone actually eat one. Are they meant to be eaten from your hand, cut up with a fork and knife, or scooped out with a spoon? If someone can find a reference it may help to add the information to the lead as well, thanks NeilHynes - TalkEdits 17:39, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: That depends on taste, really, but generally the stuffing is supposed to be eaten together with the pepper, as they complement each other. Kostja (talk) 12:00, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  How does one eat them 

message: In the UK, most of the major supermarkets (Tesco, Sainsbury's, ASDA etc) sell stuffed peppers, both loose on the deli counter or salad bar and in small packs on the fresh/dairy aisle. From what I have seen, the stuffed peppers are usually cherry peppers (though I have seen Jalapenos used as well) they are normally stuffed with one of several types of soft cheese (typically Ricotta orMizithra though cottage cheese is used as well sometimes). Generally these stuffed peppers are displayed with antipasti such as olives, anchovies and sundried tomatoes.Zeb 01:16, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: UK Supermarkets

message: Everything mixed up. The page is in "Wikiproject Romania". Is Romania in the Middle East or in the Mediterranean region? BTW South Asia seems to be also a subregion of one of those. Good work. And the winner is: Vine leaves are stuffed peppers, why not? --176.239.110.43 (talk) 16:57, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mediterranean-Middle East 

message: Regional variant, already partly covered by the article. Nk (talk) 12:18, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 09:44, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Punjena paprika]] into [[Stuffed peppers]]
Talk:James Emman Kwegyir Aggrey

message: The text of the article seems to be identical to that on German language WP. Only in German it is well readable, whereas the English version seems to have come into existence by using a rather simple translation programme, which operates on the basis of word-by-word translations or "best guesses", hence the very poor style and limited understandability of this version.129.143.4.65 19:48, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, the translation was poor, but I've improved it and added the sources from the German article. Rigadoun  (talk) 19:06, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Source
Talk:Sandy Green (mathematician)

message: The usage of "James A. Green" is under discussion, see talk:James A. Green (Pennsylvania politician) -- 65.94.43.89 (talk) 05:26, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: "{{noredirect|James A. Green}}"
Talk:Grenoside

message: Sorry to put that there, whoever started this article off has done a good job with it mainly (it needs referencing though).
The section I am concerned about is as follows:
Today Grenoside is a suburb of Sheffield and is mainly residential,a lot of development in the area has created an increase in population. ("recent development" would be better)
Grenoside contains many places to worship with three churches within the village, and one just outside. A period of change has taken place in Grenoside, with the Primary school, leaving the infant site and moving into a new building on the junior side of the road. The Junior building has been demolished. The community feel is in practice as most of the children that attend the school live in or just outside the village of Grenoside. (This sentence is awkward and possibly not very neutral)
The old council offices were demolished in 2006 to make way for a new build project. This was opposed by local residents but still got the go ahead. The car sales pitch on the same road as the old council offices have also applied to build more flats. It is anticipated that the old infant school buildings are likely to be converted into flats. This can only add to the population of what was once a quiet village. This section comes across as biased to me. I would change it to something like "to make way for a new build project, which was opposed by local residents. You don't need the "still got the go ahead", it smacks of sour grapes and is unnecessary. I'd remove the last sentence entirely and just add that further development in Grenoside will lead to population increase.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ohgodiva (talk • contribs) 12:04, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV
Talk:James Amann

message: Needs a source for this statement  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.14.84.60 (talk) 13:22, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Pauly Walnuts"

message: Criticism about Amann is wiped clean, while the self serving "peacock" material is left alone  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.9.141.78 (talk) 04:29, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: The Bots want a memory hole
Talk:Adir Hu

message: I always thought the translation was "x is he" as in "Holy is he" "King is he" etc. All the haggadot (that's more than one haggadah for those non-Hebrew Speakers) that I've seen have that too. If nobody objects in 48 hours, I will change it. Smartyllama (talk) 15:02, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  translation