lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:John Poelker

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://dynamic.stlouis-mo.gov/history/peopledetail.cfm?Master_ID=989. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Asartea Talk | Contribs 16:03, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Doris Angleton

message: I have deleted this as a clear example of reader sabotage.
valentinejoesmith
I did massive article cleanup on this. How do I get it reviewed and get more specific directions? Narnibird 00:20, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Here's one. Don't use her first name on second and later references. Call her "Angleton" throughout the article, not "Doris," except in cases where there is confusion about which Angleton is being referred to (her or her husband).  Moncrief 12:21, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Given that Doris is only notable for being a murder victim, I propose that we change the title to 'Murder of Doris Angleton
and the focus of the article to reflect that aspect. Personally, I think the most notable aspect of this case was the attempt to try her husband twice for it despite double jeopardy laws. I plan to flesh out that section when I get a chance. Thoughts? Bali88 (talk) 18:56, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: You are quite correct to suggest renaming this article, as it only briefly mentions Doris Angleton. I will suggest the move.--Quisqualis (talk) 01:00, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed name change
Talk:Edward Bates

message: After reading "Team of Rivals" (by Doris Kearns Goodwin), I was under the impression that there were four main candidates, Chase, Seward, Bates, and Lincoln. Isn't that true?  PRhyu 14:29, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep.  Those four plus, to a lesser extent, Cameron.  I made the change.--Son of lucas (talk) 10:33, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: The Three Candidates???

message: Belmont was a plantation in Goochland County, Virginia (outside Richmond, VA). Belmont has nothing to do with Northern Virginia. Narwhalhistory
:Fixed the info box reference to Goochland. --Onemoregain (talk) 02:47, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Belmont

message: In Goodwins "Team of Rivals" she states that (at least as far as 1860 is concerned) Bates was NOT a member of the Republican Party, being unwilling to give up on the old Whig party: "Though Bates acknowledged he had never officially joined the Republican Party, he understood that many Republicans,...." (page 26) it goes on to say many thought his nomination would be good for winning the election (that's paraphrased obviously), but I think that it is clear he wasn't a Republican, at least in 1860 during the nomination.Vyselink (talk) 04:32, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No response yet. I'll leave it alone for another couple of days and then I'm going to change it if I don't get any words.Vyselink (talk) 21:29, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Republican party member? 

message: The section on Bates's time as attorney general does not seem like it accurately reflects him, at least from what I've read in Goodwin's Team of Rivals. For instance, the section currently says that he "disagreed with Lincoln on emancipation and the recruitment of blacks into the Union Army" when discussing the progression of Abraham Lincoln's presidency. While it is true that he initially held that view, he was the second cabinet member (Edwin Stanton was the first) to voice complete support for the measure because he believed it would help bring about a faster end to the war. Where are any sources backing up the negative view of Bates's time as attorney general? I think it would be better to add these details which paint a different picture of Bates than the one that currently is up.
Kirbyfan1996 (talk) 15:46, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attorney General 

message: If anyone is interested, I have stubbed Bates' oldest son, Barton Bates, a judge of the Supreme Court of Missouri. Cheers! bd2412 T 04:14, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Barton Bates]]
Talk:Clarence Cannon

message: This article should probably be adjusted to tone down the puffery and peacock language (see example below). If an active editor on this page could assist, that would be best. Otherwise, I can check back later and make some changes. 
 Beyond the scope of legislation, Cannon's publications on congressional procedure have achieved the status of holy writ for successive generations of lawmakers. His contributions to agricultural and appropriation policies and parliamentary procedure, enhanced by his colorful personality, have ensured him a place as one of the major congressional figures of the twentieth century.Writethisway (talk) 15:13, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Puffery and Peacock words
Talk:Archibald Bulloch Roosevelt Jr.

message: I appreciate the Roosevelt historians or Roosevelt family members who quickly jumped in here.  SimonATL 05:39, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Thanks for corrections and additional information

message: Unless someone has a complaint, I'm going to move this page to "Moving name to Archibald Bulloch Roosevelt, Jr." (with a period).  That's how most Jr./Sr. names I could find were formatted.  ~a (user • talk • contribs) 22:33, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Moving name to Archibald Bulloch Roosevelt, Jr. (with period)

message: The only picture we have of him is as a baby, which is kind of strange for someone who died of old age. Do we have any adult photographs? Titanium Dragon (talk) 01:49, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Adult photograph?
Talk:Champ Clark

message: Someone has to investigate this because I read different things about this man. Was he really oposed to the Federal Reserve Act? Why the Los Angeles Tribune put him in 1912 as a friend of the Bankers??? Sorry for my English.
Image of the news: http://superitch.com/images/2010/10/CartoonsMagazine191206pg16aBarnettLosAngelesTribune.jpg  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.164.52.89 (talk) 20:22, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Was he really oposed to the Trusts and the Bankers?
Talk:Harry B. Hawes

message: User:Benjaminisrael (talk) added all the following content without wikifying (or sourcing). Most of the rest of the article is contained within it, it just needs to be worked on and added in where appropriate. I might work on it some, but any help would be appreciated. Thanks and happy editing! TysK 22:22, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs Wikifying

message: Uploaded a large expansion of the article along with a second image of Hawes. I was able to confirm an source some, but not all, of the information BenjaminIsreal had posted above and included it accordingly. Sector001 (talk) 18:07, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion
Talk:David W. Hopkins

message: I think the University of Iowa is in Iowa City, not Iowa State.  Also, the Sigma Pi Emerald lists him as an alumnus of the University of Iowa.  I thought I should check here before changing something that references his Congress biography. Gooseneck41 17:38, 11 Jul 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The official name of the University of Iowa is the State University of Iowa which can cause some confusion.  I am changing his undergrad college to the University of Iowa instead of Iowa State.Gooseneck41 16:20, 29 Aug 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: University
Talk:William L. Hungate

message: This article has been classified as a start. However, it needs to be sourced. Capitalistroadster 02:44, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I was about to change it from Start to B, which I propose to do shortly.  Looking atWikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment, it seem to me to be there. --KenWalker | Talk 04:10, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Start classification

message: I'm traveling through the remainder of the week, and can't get to this until next week. But, it will be sourced asap.  Scott Clarkson 02:38, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sourcing

message: A temporary subpage at User:Polbot/fjc/William Leonard Hungate was automatically created by a perl script, based on this article at the Biographical Directory of Federal Judges. The subpage should either be merged into this article, or moved and disambiguated. Polbot (talk) 00:19, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Bot-created subpage
Talk:James W. Symington

message: This article was created on 22 February 2006 and has had edits to it by nine different authors through 5 November 2006.  An article on the same subject was created on 29 March 2006 (James Wadsworth Symington).  I have merged the contents of the second article into this one and have made "James Wadsworth Symington" into a redirect to this article.  The history is available to show all contributions to this topic.  — ERcheck (talk) 01:40, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 
Talk:Shaw Island

message: Should we mention something about the water there? Last time I visited Shaw Island, the water reeked of sulfur.--Max Talk [ (add)]  05:45, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you be more specific about what water reeked of sulfur? I assume not the surrounding saltwater, and, AFAIK, all tap water is from individual private wells (with the possible exception(s) of one or more of the dense communities in the northwest third of the island sharing community wells), so it's probably a highly localized, temporary, and/or intermittent problem. The water from a small spring on our family property on the island doesn't have a noticeable odor. Sohelpme 19:29, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Water 

message: www.shaw-island.com is currently down and the comic was discontinued almost a year ago now. Should we remove it completely or mention it somehow in the article? --Bringa 16:24, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comic Strip
Talk:Bennett Champ Clark

message: A temporary subpage at User:Polbot/fjc/Bennett Champ Clark was automatically created by a perl script, based on this article at the Biographical Directory of Federal Judges. The subpage should either be merged into this article, or moved and disambiguated. Polbot (talk) 17:36, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Bot-created subpage
Talk:James Shields (politician, born 1806)

message: I've read (on this site actually) that the duel between Shields and Lincoln was abandoned by Shields when Lincoln chose cavalry broadswords as a weapon, as his height would allow him a reach advantage. Here it says they were talked out of it by their seconds. Which is more accurate? Doom Music 14:15, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This was the story told in the documentary Lincoln: Prelude to the Presidency  which I saw today. It also mentioned that the "seconds" of the two men stepped in and discussed halting the duel after Lincoln's shot felled that branch, and that the duel was called off due to the fact that the articles (other than the first one) were NOT written by Lincoln. Nhprman  20:57, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Duel 

message: Some old books in Google"james+shields"+"freehold+academy"#q=%22james+shields%22+%22freehold+academy%22&tbm=bks say so, though it's hard to fit into the biography offered here. Wareh (talk) 20:15, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Principal of [[Freehold Academy]] in New Jersey? 

message: There are two James Shields who served in the US Congress, this one served as Senator in three states, the other James Shields was a one term Representative from Ohio, and the uncle of this one (according to that page). Wouldn't it be easier and better aesthetically just to rename them James Shields (Senator) and James Shields (Representative) respectively? --Nofix (talk) 08:24, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: That is a good idea Rjensen (talk) 08:34, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I suggested this in the section directly above this one. Kraxler (talk) 12:23, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: My apologies, I skimmed right over that. So, with no dissent so far should we change it or not until there is more of a debate on it?--Nofix (talk) 03:41, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure, but are the targets that Kraxler proposed better? Ivanvector (talk) 18:59, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess so? Why not.--Nofix (talk) 10:41, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  A suggested renaming of two men
Talk:Stuart Symington

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: here. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Diannaa (talk) 02:33, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: In the article about the Northrop YB-49 it is mentioned that Symington left politics for a position at convair. His bio here makes no mention of this. One of the articles must be inaccurate? 
178.232.170.1 (talk) 18:51, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  convair
Talk:Policies of the Thaksin administration

message: The anti-drug policy section is severely skewed to emphasize the English speaking sphere point of view of the policy. There is only about 3-4 lines that talks about how the general public of Thailand view the policy. It portrayed the whole affair in a very negative light, only mentioning the point of view of some foreign human right organizations, while the general Thai people viewed it positively and it was effective in toning down the drugs crimes. The only survey that talked about how the public's opinion is done AFTER the "drugs war", in 2005, after Thai government dampen the policy to be less "ruthless", while the "drug war" happened in Feb 2003. It is extremely misleading in showing how the public view the policy in those 3 months and they are taken out of context in dealing demonstrating the public support of the actual policies. (Also the link to that opinion poll is down) It's like Thai people have no say in their own national policy and only western human right activist who are educated in "free thinking" knows what's right and what's wrong for the national policies of ANOTHER country. Way to be not condescending.
130.126.28.18 (talk) 01:59, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Allegations of bias and POV
Talk:Mỹ Thuận Bridge

message: Okay, folks. This article is of noteworthy content because (a) it's the first bridge in the Mekong Delta (b), it's the nearest one to the sea, and (c) it is the first land link between the south of the country and the rest of the country. Hopefully that will allow lots of poor hard-working Vietnamese to lift themselves out of poverty, and so on.
It's also a pretty bridge, and smooth to drive.
More coming soon.
--Tphcm 06:01, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  A stub, but it won't be a stub for long
Talk:Puyo Puyo Fever 2

message: It seems to me that the Characters section is in POV, for example dubbing characters "most annoying", "everyone's favorite," etc. I hope somebody could fix this. Trefgy 12:11, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Characters

message: Since this has no planned release outside of Japan, should the page not be at Puyo Puyo Fever 2, and not Puyo Pop Fever 2? Tim (Xevious) 20:53, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: The article says the U.S. release had been confirmed for sometime this year, but the side information shows it as discontinued. Which is correct?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.71.35.179 (talk) 02:49, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Put it as unreleased, as it hasn't been released in either Europe or North America.Missingno255 (talk) 05:54, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Wouldn't that assume it's still planned? It is most likely never coming if it ever was but there's no sources in English for this it seems. Nmn (talk) 08:45, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No. I put it that way because there wasn't anything in Nintendo power or EGM about this.  Maybe you can help me improve this article?Missingno255 (talk) 04:21, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm going to give a shot at finding some refs and improving the PoV situation on the char section. Please do improve if i mess something up. Nmn (talk) 09:36, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  North America Release 

message: Why did my Strange Sig char get deleted?
: You should pay more attention to the edit summaries. I do not believe fan characters qualify as notable enough content. Strange Sig, though popular, would probably be some variant of Sig (Imagine; It could just be Sig if the evil parts of the demon weren't stored away in the book.) At most, you could get away with noting him in the section for Sig, but that really is something that can't be sourced so well.
: Oh, and no spaces before ==s or else it shows up as code - but i'm sure you know that now. (Also, You should be signing your messages here with 4 tildes, e.g. ~~~~) Nmn (talk) 03:44, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The world doesn't revolve around you, you know. Also, try signing your comments with ~~~~ next time. ~ Keiji (iNVERTED) (Talk) 19:04, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Why delete Strange Sig
Talk:Citizens' Health Care Working Group

message: Anyone have any opinion about the rewording of the introduction to this article? Is it now sufficent to merit removal of the context tag? Here's a link  showing what it looked like before I started work on it today, and here  is what it looks like now. Thanks, -- Argon233 T @ C ¶ U ∠  06:11, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As I have recieved no comment on this matter over the last 3 days, I'm going to remove the context tag. Anyone that disagrees with this is welcome to discuss that here. Thanks -- Argon233 T @ C ¶ U ∠  19:50, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Context tag 
Talk:Mark Lindsay

message: Lindsay's appearance on Married With Children should be mentioned here.  This man's life work means nothing without that mention.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chris1emt (talk • contribs) 10:23, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Married With Children

message: I have placed a copy vio notice on this article beacuse most of its text verbatim match www.allmusic.com article on the same subject. -JCarriker 06:19, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That doesn't matter. You can't just copy a source verbatim, that's plagarism. You can include quatations of it, but not the majority of the article. Inclusion of a source in such a manner is a violation of wikipedia policy. -JCarriker 18:19, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fine, it's changed. Trilemma 20:12, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

text: *Acceptable. You can use information from other sources if you want to expand the article. You just cannot cut and paste it nor transcribe it wholesale. Thanks for your prompt response and cooperation. -JCarriker 23:10, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have restored the version of the article written by Liliputian.  This is not a cut and paste of the material from allmusic.com, unlike the previous version by Trilemma. -JCarriker 19:06, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert 

message: Following unsigned text moved here from article External links section:
Mark Lindsay was born in Eugene, Or. not Idaho. Source is Portland Tribune article.
http://www.portlandtribune.com/features/story.php?story_id=117416882904275300
Created References section and sourced statement in article.  Conrad T. Pino 19:07, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth place 

message: it says that he died in 2014 on this site ??
18:30, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  isn't mark lindsay still ALIVE ?
Talk:Mount Vernon

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Historic Mount Vernon and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 8#Historic Mount Vernon until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  TraderCharlotte (talk) 21:16, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Historic Mount Vernon" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The name section explains where “Vernon” came from (the same guy who invented grog, and gave it its name by his choice of coats, in fact), but why “mount”, seeing as there don’t seem to be any mountains anywhere near there?71.236.206.225 (talk) 03:26, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why “Mount “? 

message: There is a debate over whether to keep Homes of the US Founding Fathers as a category. More opinions are needed.
The discussion is located Here -- Gwillhickers (talk) 20:14, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Debate to delete a Category

message: I forgot to submit an explanation as part of the submit -- I was going through multiple previews. Much of the content is modified from the Moyaone Reserve page that I recently created. Soren Dayton (talk) 15:09, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added a subsection on the Mount Vernon Viewshed