Talk:Deep Blue Sea (1999 film)

message: Hate to burst someone's bubble, but the shark in Jaws III is not blown up in a gas explosion, but with a grenade.  RoyBatty42 09:18, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Jaws' Sharks' deaths

message: I'm very curious about the budget of the film. Does anybody know? Or where I can find it?--Danieller 213 13:22, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Budget 

message: Who elses agrees that when you first saw this movie, seeing Samuel Jackson get eaten after that rousing speech was one of the biggest "WTF?!?!" moments you've ever seen in a movie?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 169.139.251.227 (talk) 01:45, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: AFTER the rousing speech??  Try DURING the rousing speech.  I laughed so hard I spurted Mountain Dew out my nose.  Schoop (talk) 19:41, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have to agree, I watched the scene while eating and sprayed garberated cookie all over the TV... The Wurm-70.78.26.87 (talk) 01:27, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biggest "WTF?!?!" Moment 

message: I remember back when this movie first came out there was a lot of talk about this movie breaking all the horror movie "rules". The drunk teens at the start of the movie got saved, the biggest star dies, the main female dies, a black guy survives etc 
While these details are pretty much covered in the plot section I would like to see some more real world context about how this movie mixed it up to be different. Thoughts? Rekija (talk) 01:08, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The Rules" 

message: It was pretty much a copy/paste from just about everywhere.  Since I just discovered I have no idea how to properly may a copy vio report, I've removed it.  I'm dropping a note over on the WP:FILM page so hopefully we can get a real plot in here.  Millahnna (talk) 20:02, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: As notet at WT:FILM, I've reported this to WP:CP, although I suspect it may be a reverse infringement. --BelovedFreak 21:08, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with Beloved on this one. It's fairly common for websites to copy summaries of Wikipedia - It would explain why the text, in its exact formatting and prose, appears on multiple other random websites. --  StarScream1007  ►Talk   00:43, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: yeah I think this one is going to turn out to be fine after all.  I swore that the opening paragraph in particular was nearly verbatim to some of the press materials (and possibly the DVD blurb) but I finally found the DVD and that's not the case.  I couldn't find anything in the earlier dated search hits that was all that official so I'm assuming I had it all wrong.  On the plus side, I've learned  lot about how NOT to deal with possible copy vio this week.  SOrry for the hassle all.  Millahnna (talk) 19:33, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Better to be safe than sorry. :) I added to the mess by jumping to the conclusion that the other webiste was copied from IMDb and hence that our article was too. I think it's going to be ok, but would feel more comfortable from a WP:CP regular saying so.--BelovedFreak 19:36, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

text: Thanks for digging allt eh way back, Moonriddengirl. I official accept all trouts thrown my way.  Arg.  Millahnna (talk) 16:16, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot removed 

message: Okay, I've watched the commentary and deleted scenes from the DVD and nowhere does Mr. Harlin mention that McAlester was supposed to survive the movie and that the ending was reshot. So unless someone finds a source for that, I'm removing it from the article. --TheHande (talk) 07:36, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Die, bitch!" 

message: Since I don't see anything on the page that would warrant the Citation tag, I'm removing it. --TheHande (talk) 15:58, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing the Citation tag! 

message: In the movie Thomas Jane says, that the biggest Gen 2 shark is 45 foot in length. But I always doubted that. I do my research with the DVD player and guess what - the biggest shark at the end is just 28 feet long - 8,6 meters! Which means that the giant shark at the end is only three feet longer than Spielbergs Original Bruce.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.35.172.213 (talk) 15:25, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Length of the biggest shark 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Deep Blue Sea (1999 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150507203717/http://www.thevine.com.au:80/entertainment/top10/top-ten-surprise-movie-deaths-20110412-261046 to http://www.thevine.com.au/entertainment/top10/top-ten-surprise-movie-deaths-20110412-261046
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:54, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: No reason was given why my contributions were reverted by . Per WP:FILMLEAD, the lead is suppose to be a brief summary of the body's key aspects. The "represented a test for Harlin" sentence is already covered in the body word for word, so there's no need to repeat it in the lead. "Released in theaters during the summer season" is unnecessary. Readers can deduce that the film was released in theaters during the summer with my edit, "was theatrically released on July 28, 1999" and the production budget can be noted when measuring it against its box office gross. With that said, what was wrong with my edit? Armegon (talk) 22:31, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: In my opinion, there is no need to repeat the release date in the third paragraph because the opening sentence of the first paragraph already says it's a 1999 film. Indeed, the lead is a summary of the article's body, so there is nothing wrong with repeating the fact that the film represented a test for Harlin, and I was not sure why that sentence was removed without an explanation. Lastly, mentioning the budget in the second paragraph makes more sense because the second paragraph is about the film's production, while the third one is about the release and reception. --Niwi3 (talk) 07:29, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead Dispute