lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of artists signed to Magnatune

message: Does this count only artists who are currently releasing new work via Magnatune? I know Bjorn Fogelberg released one album via Magnatune (but also via other means) but apparently that was a one-time thing. Given that Magnatune is different from the traditional "record label" in many different ways, maybe this article should be renamed to "List of artists currently releasing new albums via Magnatune" or similar. --Shawn K. Quinn 00:06, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Define "signed" 

message: What's the point of having an artist list in Wikipedia that will always be incomplete and out of date? Are the catalogs of iTunes, HMV, and Amazon encyclopedic too?  I would replace this list with a few notable artists based on some criteria such as: the first artists who gained high Magnatune sales in their genre, the most famous artists who've agreed to be sold on Magnatune, or artists who began their career on Magnatune and since became mainstream. Sluggoster (talk) 20:07, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delete article
Talk:Elvis (disambiguation)

message: Anyone know the origin of the name Elvis? - TheMightyQuill 01:46, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Origin

message: I disagree with the merge. This page is for articles that can be reasonably referred to as simply "Elvis." The reason it's "Presley-heavy" is because Elvis Presley is the only person commonly referred to as simply "Elvis." Moving the other names back would just be arbitrary. Propaniac (talk) 12:57, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: But Elvis already redirects to Elvis Presley. This is a disambiguation page.  I expect to see all references to Elvis listed here, including other people named Elvis, which is lacking.  This is almost entirely about Presley and that is inappropriate for what this page is designed for.  Bytebear (talk) 17:24, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal

message: The text sounds incorrect.  Surely this is a list of top celebrity-related pet names?!  A link to the source should be provided.
—DIV (128.250.80.15 (talk) 08:27, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pet names
Talk:Compute!'s Gazette

message: The article says it was about Commodore's 8-bit computers. However, did it cover all of Commodore's 8-bit computers, or just VIC-20 and C64 (and C128?)?Jasonlvc 04:05, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure what it fully covered. When I was reading it the main focus was the C64 and I think there were soem articles on the C128 as well. I'm pretty sure they lso covered GEOS, etc. later on as well. The article mentions a lot of utilties for typing in programs but what I remember best was the music related stuff on the disks (thanks to the C64's supperio audio capabilities thanks to the SID chip), some interesting games, and most of all for several great articles on publishing (layout & design type stuff). Not sure of Gamebase64 has some of the material from the disks. It was really great magazine! Argel1200 (talk) 21:34, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Commodore 4040

message: The main article could be improved by explaining how the Commodore 4040 got its name.   Did the "40" represent the width of the intersector gap?
Or, since it was a dual disk drive, the same intersector gap might have been used on both diskettes. 
Or did the "40" represent the width of the synch mark, 5 bytes having 40 bits or so?   216.99.201.230 (talk) 06:20, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of the name
Talk:Creative Computing (magazine)

message: I believe the were at least two books of BASIC programs published from this magazine.  Anyone have any info? 66.191.19.217 17:09, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That could be BASIC Computer Games. -- Make (talk) 20:45, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Books? 

message: As the games section expands towards a complete list, we may eventually want to consider using a table and a separate list article. I'll see if I can set up a sortable table in advance - presumably we'd want at least title, release year, platform, and maybe a disk/cassette column. --tronvillain (talk) 16:21, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Games
Talk:Western Digital FD1771

message: It's FD1771, and not WD1771. See my comment on Western Digital discussion.--Ijor (talk) 01:37, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

message: This page should be moved to FD1771. All of their early floppy disk ICs were named FD17xx. -- SWTPC6800 (talk) 05:37, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Seconded, although I suggest a name of Western Digital FD1771, to fit the <make> <model> convention. Feel free. -- Regregex (talk) 14:43, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Move completed, link above removed. -- Regregex (talk) 18:03, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move
Talk:List of Syriac writers

message: I removed Bardaisan and Yuhanon Dolabani (Dolapönü). Bardaisan was called "philosopher of the Aramaeans" by Ephrem the Syrian, metropolitan Dolabani explicitly referred to himself and his people as "Aramaeans" (source: Urhoy). --Benne ['bɛnə] (talk) 09:51, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs cleanup
Talk:PicoBlaze

message: Function pointers
PicoBlaze, as far as I know, does support function pointers with the "CALL@" instruction, represented in hexadecimal with 24xy0 (where x and y are registers in which the function pointer is stored).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.252.225.65 (talk) 12:57, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I think that saying "PicoBlaze doesn't support function pointers." is a very misleading statement, if not outright wrong. It should not be on Wikipedia. Maybe we should not go into too much detail, but we should at least be careful not to be misleading. 89.201.229.123 (talk) 11:57, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

text: Why shouldn't the article mention that there are two versions of the PicoBlaze processor and while KCPSM3 does not allow for computed branching, the KCPSM6 does? 82.143.146.166 (talk) 21:28, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Why should the article even mention that KCPSM3 didn't allow computed branching? Why would it be important that some archaic version of PicoBlaze didn't support computed branching? This is not a retrocomputing wiki. 95.178.249.61 (talk) 16:35, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

text: I'd suggest the whole "Architectural Notes" paragraph be removed. It probably contains nothing but misinformation. 89.201.234.5 (talk) 12:13, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
Talk:Compaq Portable II

message: "However, the first 16-bit slot was already occupied by a CGA graphics card and one of the 8-bit slots was used by the ATA drive controller board, leaving two available to add cards to." -- They got this wrong. The six Compaq Portable II's I have all have 8-bit CGA cards and 16-bit multi IO controllers. As starndard, the Multi-IO controller (with IDE, Floppy, Parallel, Serial) is in Slot 1 (closest to the front of the case), and the second slot is reserved by the 8-bit CGA card. First slot is a 16-bit slot, 2nd slot is a 8-bit slot, 3rd slot is a 16-bit slot, and 4th slot again an 8-bit slot. 16-bit IO card: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Compaq_Portable_II_Multi-IO_ISA_card.jpg , Reference picture of the motherboard: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Inside_the_Compaq_Portable_II,_view_of_the_motherboard_and_ISA_slots.jpg. I've not seen other computers with a different arrangement on the motherboard, so I've corrected the article. --Molivil (talk) 16:50, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slight error in details about the ISA card arrangement
Template talk:NFL1990s

message: Can the piped link to Darren Bennett link to Darren Bennett (football player), as opposed to it currently linking to a redirect, so that it bolds correctly. On a related note, why is this template full protected when it is only transcluded on about 50 articles and there doesn't appear to be a history of vandalism?
Jenks24 (talk) 08:49, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: . I agree that full protection probably isn't necessary here - I've reduced to to semi-protection. —  Tivedshambo  (t/c) 18:43, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Cheers, Jenks24 (talk) 04:31, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request from Jenks24, 29 December 2010
Talk:Intel 80387SX

message: Thanks. 98.14.223.143 (talk) 14:13, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  When was it made? 

message: This stub should be deleted as it contains less information than the main article on coprocessors. 109.153.242.10 (talk) 17:54, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Support: I came here to make the same deletion request, only to discover that you already had.  There is nothing here that is not already in the X87 article. 86.151.114.31 (talk) 17:31, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delete request
Talk:MIPS-X

message: I verified with the author of the Programmer's Manual, that this instruction is a joke.  I'm not sure how to cite that.  As personal communication?  Billgordon1099 03:48, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: hsc instruction
Talk:National Negro Congress

message: I am in the process of adding more material to this article for my American Working Class Movements class MCrookston1018 (talk) 01:03, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: You should have posted this notice weeks ago. Don't be surprised when you get reverted. Chris Troutman (talk) 01:37, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Educational assignment

message: You took large portions of text from blackpast.org among others. You had better fix it quickly before I have this article reverted.  Chris Troutman (talk) 23:26, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Correction: this article had copyrighted content before this class started, although I can't pinpoint exactly who added what when. I'd recommend re-writing the whole thing in your own words while correcting and updating content to ensure there's no similarity to the source material. Chris Troutman (talk) 23:36, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagiarism 

message: Heavy going with lots of communist jargon, also incorrect English. Please edit with a consideration of general readers. More sources should be consulted; the movement was well documented.Parkwells (talk) 22:00, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs editing for sense and style
Talk:Antic (magazine)

message: Why are there two different ISSN numbers?
*  is listed in article, 
*  is printed on 6th page - e.g. https://archive.org/details/1986-05-anticmagazine/page/n5/mode/1up
Ololuki (talk) 18:41, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two ISSN numbers
Talk:Compaq LTE

message: I actually own a LTE 286 of my own, complete with an instruction manual and all.  I'd be happy to post whatever details I've got.  The chart includes the Compaq Portable 386, Portable III, SLT/286 (model 2680), LTE/286 (series 2690) and LTE (2690A), but I'm not sure how much I can include without violating copyright laws.  That, and I'm pretty sure the LTE series ended at LTE 5400, with an early Pentium processor (roughly 166 MHz) X-Kal (talk) 04:22, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Detailed specifications 

message: This is the physical creation of the Lappy 486.  My life will now be dedicated to purchasing one of these.  Some Douchebag ~~  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.209.148.49 (talk) 17:02, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lappy 486!!! 
Talk:EDUC-8

message: Throughout the article, the Educ-8 is referred to repeatedly as a Microcomputer.  Though this is how the original documentation referred to it, as the Educ-8 used a processor constructed from 7400 series TTL chips rather than a microprocessor it is instead technically a small and simple minicomputer.  -- 134.225.193.183 (talk) 14:58, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Microcomputer?
Talk:Soft microprocessor

message: Notability:  Please list cores that are synthesizable and have a compiler toolchain.  Poppafuze (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 22:41, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: can i recommend a column that has the (supported / tested) compiler toolchains listed? User:lkcl   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.40.169.215 (talk) 14:36, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Core Comparison

message: What is it? 216.187.191.94 (talk) 20:03, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Since it's hard to tell for ASIC CPUs whether they are purely synthesized, I'd like to propose that we limit the definition to non-ASIC processors. What do you all think? Digital27 (talk) 05:28, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Difference Between Soft and Hard Microprocessors 

message: There is no site on Wikipedia for SoPC (System on Programmable Chip) or is the link wrong?
Michilans (talk) 06:57, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  SoPC (System on Programmable Chip)  

message: Perhaps a 'year introduced' column would be a useful addition to this table, especially for those unfamiliar with the history.
Thoughts?
-- Jim Grisham (talk) 13:37, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal new column for Core comparison table
Talk:LongRun

message: This is really a stub of stubs.  More description? Polounit 05:45, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:IBM 37xx

message: Why does this article have that category? tooold 03:16, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: category: History of computing hardware

message: I reorganized this article, tried to include all 37xx boxes and provide more chronology.  I note that the 3705 and 3745 have their own articles with much more detail, but for some reason the 3720 has an article while the 3725 does not. Peter Flass (talk) 00:20, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reorganization
Talk:Long Island (New South Wales)

message: In the List of islands of Australia in NSW there are two Long Islands, with a note that one no longer exists.  I can only find references for one island.    Do anyone have any more information on the assumed second one?  If it can't be found, I suggest there two records are merged.  Stellar (talk) 11:12, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Pretty sure they are one and the same place. The one pretty well described in this article is in the Hawkesbury River and is technically no longer an island because it is connected to the mainland by a railway causeway. It is also arguably within the Sydney region, as our article Sydney defines that as bounded to the north by the Hawkesbury River. The other article says very little except that it subject is in Sydney and is a former island. Have merged and removed templates. -- Starbois (talk) 18:31, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Long Island - are there two? 
Talk:Right Wing of the Republic

message: There were several amendments discussed and only one of them was aimed at actual resticting the abortion rights. All the other amendments were intended to retain the status quo (so that it would not possible to make the law more liberal without changing the constitution). That's way it is more accurate to write "protecting the prenatal life" than "restricting the abortion rights". The intention was to protect the prenatal life by constitutional regulations and not necessarily change the current law. --BotevFixer 02:06, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The English word "right" is highly polysemic — that is, carries a great number of potential meanings.  As a result, this article's current title, "Right of the Republic," is confusing.  "Right," in this context, is more likely to be interpreted as "entitlement" than as "right wing," which is the actual meaning of the original Polish "prawica."
The ambiguity of "Right of the Republic" can easily be remedied by modifying it to "Right Wing of the Republic" — which is what the Polish original means.  Nihil novi (talk) 04:28, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Article title
Talk:Unistar

message: The sentences "Created in 2005 by Constellation Energy and Areva, UniStar Nuclear became UniStar Nuclear Energy in August 2007 - a joint venture by Constellation Energy and EDF" lack clarity and should be backed up. If Areva's stake was bought out by EDF, this should be included in the article. Additionally there are no cited sources other than a dead link. Usedstarfighter (talk) 18:08, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  2005 to 2007 Areva to EDF Ownership Clarity
Talk:Situationism (disambiguation)

message: Situationism does NOT equal situational ethics.. this redirect should be abolished and an rticle about guy dabord, the lettrists, and raoul vanegeim should instead persist in this location.
:ummm... ok. but isn't a situationist an adherent of situationism ? 86.106.43.93 10:22, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:RAD750

message: Why write this without giving any additional information or a reference? CapnZapp (talk) 17:09, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: A successor was planned for 2007, that's relevant information, and the references shows this. What this successor is and why it's over due is not known so we can't elaborate on it.-- Henriok (talk) 08:57, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed that statement since I could not find a reference which clearly states that a successor was going to be released in 2007. I could only find a single mention of "next generation" on the far right side of a RAD750 processor roadmap chart in a reference from 2002 and it does not clearly distinguish whether it was planned for 2007 or at some point after 2007. --GrandDrake (talk) 05:59, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "a successor was planned for 2007"? 

message: Should this be called IBM RAD750 to match the other article IBM RAD6000 ? 184.144.166.85 (talk) 12:44, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: No, IBM is neither designing it nor manufacturing it, and it's not the processor's name. BAE is doing this on license, and the PowerPC 750 was jointly developed by Motorola and IBM. –– Henriok (talk) 20:49, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: Draft:RAD5500 contains information on related products that I've suggested be merged into this article rather than being included as a separate article. ~KvnG 16:07, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: User:BerserkerBen points out RAD6000 should also be considered in this. I support his proposal to merge this content together into RAD series processors or RAD (microprocessor). We can have redirects for each member of the family but I don't think there's enough material to merit an individual article for each family member at this time. ~KvnG 15:44, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Well I begin drafting an article for RAD (microprocessor), once I'm done I will link this and RAD6000 to it and convert those articles to redirects, does anyone disagree. I'll give it a week. BerserkerBen (talk) 17:19, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm opposing a merging of the RADx articles (RAD6000, RAD750 and RAD5500), but I'm not opposing an article about BAE's RAD family of processors (BAE Radiation Hardened Computers, BAE RAD processors or something like that). Analog to Apple system on a chip as a umbrella to separate articles about the various members of the family. -- Henriok (talk) 10:08, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  If we made a BAE Radiation Hardened Computers we would need to fill it out by taking the information from the other 3 and putting it into one, might as well as simply turn them into redirects, for a RAD5500 article can't get passed the draft phase.BerserkerBen (talk) 00:00, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  RAD5500 

message: Do any/many of the spacecraft listed have one or more backup processors in case the first fails ? - Rod57 (talk) 12:12, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  How many processors or boards in each spacecraft
Talk:Cobalt RaQ

message: What does the second sentence in "The Cobalt RaQ was actually the second product line produced by Cobalt Networks; the first was the Cobalt Qube. Interestingly enough, this was where the name Cobalt came from." mean? Does it mean that the company was initially called something else, then made a product with Cobalt in the name, then decided to name the company after the product? Pelago 12:43, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The name Cobalt 
Talk:Computer-on-module

message: The terms "system-on-module" and "computer-on-module" can be seen as synonyms. The two separate entries could be merged into one main entry (I suggest this article), and "system-on-module" could refer to this entry. --TecCougar (talk) 13:01, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge completed on February 3, 2009 --TecCougar (talk) 13:54, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge entry "system on module" into this article 

message: I think the article Accelerated System Design using FPGA Based System-On-Modules (SOM) could be merged into this page. This article is well written and appears to be by someone who knows what he is talking about, but the problem is that it doesn't read like an encyclopedia entry. It reads like an article in a trade journal, say  EETimes. The subject matter overlaps with this article, and I think there is material there that could improve this article if rewritten in an encyclopedic style. Especially the reasons why a designer would choose an SOM, which might make a good section here. --Margin1522 (talk) 17:51, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: There's significant overlap between this article, Small form factor, and Computer form factor. The last one has a nice table and illustrations comparing sizes and features. Perhaps a refactoring of the three articles or even a merge is in order? -- SpareSimian (talk) 05:56, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It also overlaps with Computer module. --Heron (talk) 16:51, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overlapping articles 

message: We can add the following source for the sentence "Some devices also incorporate Field Programmable Gate Arrays." : 
  http://www.armadeus.com/wiki/index.php?title=APF9328
--Guillaume GG (talk) 13:45, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding sources
Talk:Cobalt Qube

message: Cobalt Qube 2: Physical:
* Dimensions: 18,4cm x 18,4cm x 19,7cm
* Weight: 2.8kg
* Power supply: 100-240V, 50/60Hz
* Power input: 25 Watt
http://www.computinghistory.org.uk/det/1112/Cobalt-Qube-2/
Cobalt Qube 3: Physical:
* Dimensions: 7.5 x 7.63 x 7.75 inches (19.05 x 19.38 x 19.69 cm)
* Weight: ~8.3lbs. - 9.5lbs. (~ 3.76kgs - 4.3kgs)
* Power requirements: Input rating 100-240V, 50/60Hz
* Maximum power consumption: 45 watts
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19793-01/816-1806/816-1806.pdf
Let's include some hardware specs
Zuckerberg (talk) 14:14, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hardware 
Talk:Shar

message: what is this article talking about anyway...
no definition, no sources, no bla bla...
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.166.88.113 (talk • contribs) 02:17, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  untitled 

message: A source which comments that someone else said something is secondhand information, and can only be used as a source by the commenter. TEDickey (talk) 10:36, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Secondhand sources 

message: A single comment in a summary section of a single source doesn't support the term generally credited. TEDickey (talk) 12:11, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  generally-credited
Talk:Baseboard management controller

message: I removed a reference that pointed to a corporate product.  While the article did provide some generic overview, the included the vendor's own software.  IMO it was too much like an advertisement.  There are many neutral overviews of IPMI on the web that could be substituted instead.Chueleven (talk) 03:26, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: November 2009
Talk:V850

message: Cafeduke (talk) 12:31, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

message: Some general descriptions of this article, especially related to flash ROM and PROM programming equipments, need to be relocated to the "Programmer (hardware)" article. The relocation of citations is an important point because another article has less citations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cafeduke (talk • contribs) 03:35, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need relocation 

message: This page article more of covers the entirety of the v800 series rather than just the v850 family. Shouldn't it be renamed to something more like "v800 CPU series", or something along those lines, and also be a bit restructured to reflect this? 20 Enderdude 20 (talk) 16:05, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename?