Talk:Beverley

message: since when does beverley have a lion...
:Never, as far as I can tell. Moved to Bad Jokes and Other Deleted Nonsense. Blisco 20:55, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I live in beverley, there is no lion. 77.86.82.135 (talk) 19:49, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  lion? 

message: I have reverted the recent change to the population in the infobox as the change was out of alignment with the text. Unfortunately I cannot locate a reference for either the 29,210 or 29,110 figure. Can anyone provide a reference for either of these figures? Keith D (talk) 23:17, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have provided a direct link to the 29,110 figure. Unfortunately the "town" boundaries of almost all market towns in England have not been redrawn since before local government reorganisation in the 1970s. Before this town boundaries were extended periodically to take account of new building but since town councils lost most of their functions to the new district authorities nobody has bothered to redraw the boundaries. 
For this reason National Statistics prefers the urban area definition for comparative purposes - ie the contiguous built-up area where the gap between buildings does not exceed 50 metres. Otherwise most of the housing built in the past 30-plus years gets excluded because technically it is situated in adjacent parishes. Jameswilson (talk) 23:15, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Population

message: This page has been protected for 1 week due to edit warring. Please use this time to establish a consensus on the content of the page. If you agree on the page contents before the protection expires, you can request the page be unprotected at WP:RFPU. Stifle (talk) 13:11, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected 

message: These diaries provide a fascinating insight into the social life of Beverley in the mid to late 18th century. Almost like Jane Austin. See and.--Harkey Lodger (talk) 08:57, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: John Courtney Diaries

message: I would like to provide some content for the Beverley porject and also to reuest a link to a web site I manage that is 100% about Beverley. Running the risk of looking like a spammer but please my intentions are genuine - www.hu17.net (Hu17dotnet (talk) 19:45, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: You are free to add to the page as long as the information supplied is in line with our policies and is sourced from reliable sources. Though I should also point you to the conflict of interest guidelines before you start. There are also links on the welcome message on your talk page that may be of use. I have my doubts about the external link but will let others have a say on that one. Keith D (talk) 22:20, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  www.hu17.net is a great site, so have no doubts Keith! It's all about Beverley and should be listed on the page! 157.203.254.3 (talk) 17:59, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  Having met Paul (the guy behind www.hu17.net) he's very genuine and the iste is excellent. It serves Beverley far, far better than the site which the Hull Daily Mail maintains. Should definately be a link to the site! Zozzie 9t9 (talk) 12:20, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beverley Project - Local Web Site 

message: Substituted at 09:33, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Beverley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080424105551/http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk:80/TUDpilgrimgrace.htm to http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/TUDpilgrimgrace.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100727142220/http://www.bgs.eriding.net:80/index.php/the_school/the_history/ to http://www.bgs.eriding.net/index.php/the_school/the_history/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071013222303/http://www.beverleyinpictures.co.uk/churches.html to http://www.beverleyinpictures.co.uk/churches.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080422201859/http://www.bevpub.co.uk:80/?page_id=28 to http://www.bevpub.co.uk/?page_id=28
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:11, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Beverley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080510105239/http://www.wf-f.org/StJohnFisher.html to http://www.wf-f.org/StJohnFisher.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:14, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hi - I'm a resident of Beverley, idly browsing through.  I noticed the section headed "Planned Expansion", and I feel it's a thinly-disguised insertion of campaigning rhetoric.  A very long and hyperbolic quote from an obscure local campaigner, using lurid phrasing like "under attack" and "steamrollered".  
I like my town and I don't want it to be spoilt by excessive or poorly-planned developments, but as a nation we have an urgent need to build more homes.  This challenge isn't unique to Beverley, any more than climate change is.  Not sure that it merits a section in the town's wikipedia article, but if there is to be a section then it should be more informative and balanced than the present text.   Thanks  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.97.32.239 (talk) 18:58, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello. I've amended the article along the lines you suggest. Please view it to ensure it meets your request. Blurryman (talk) 22:06, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: This has been re-inserted - first by an IP and then  by a newly registered user. I have reverted to  text and noted in the edit summary that the user should talk to talk page. Keith D (talk) 23:53, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Planned Expansion section seems to be campaign rhetoric 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Beverley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/developers-champing-bit-3-300-homes-built/story-24468134-detail/story.html
*Added  tag to http://consult.eastriding.gov.uk/portal/forward_planning/core/substrategy?pointId=ID-2453187-POLICY-S5-DELIVERING-HOUSING-DEVELOPMENT
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140123173445/http://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/Beverley-residents-attack-house-builders/story-20466565-detail/story.html to http://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/beverley-residents-attack-house-builders/story-20466565-detail/story.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080422201811/http://www.bevpub.co.uk/?page_id=2 to http://www.bevpub.co.uk/?page_id=2
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080422201915/http://www.bevpub.co.uk/?page_id=30 to http://www.bevpub.co.uk/?page_id=30
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:27, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The last sentence in this section was:
"St Martin's chapel was also destroyed and was a place of pilgrimage for many, was removed during the Dissolution of the Monasteries."
It's unclear what is being said, partly because of the grammar.  There was no citation for it, and I've tried to find information on line, but with no success. Bibliosporias (talk) 12:36, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a mention here but not clear what they are saying. Keith D (talk) 20:50, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I saw that -- but as you say, it doesn't clearly help.  Aside from referring to a church, not a chapel, there's no talk of pilgrimage. Bibliosporias (talk) 12:15, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Northumbrian and Viking period 

message: Does this page need a collage like other articles and the anon who made this change failed to correct a caption of one photo mistaking for the minster and not adding the minster photo. DragonofBatley (talk) 07:42, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Cannot see what the problem is with a collage in infobox. Keith D (talk) 12:05, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Collage?