Talk:Johnny Got His Gun

message: The book Johnny Got His Gun is a seething argument against war. Its messages are relevant today more than ever. Almost seventy years after the book was written, its prophetic vision has been proven to be accurate. Technological advancements have made it even easier for humans to kill themselves. This book should be read and remembered. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.17.32.26 (talk • contribs) 21:51, November 4, 2005  (UTC)
:There have also been equally amazing advances in the field of medicine. The odds that a case like this would happen in modern times are very slim. A book to be remembered? Sure. But definatly not one to be thought of as an arguement against modern war. (USMA2010 18:20, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, given the recent revelations about conditions at Walter Reed Army Medical Center and other veterans' hospitals, and the fact that modern battlefield medicine has allowed many soldiers to survive wounds that would almost certainly have been fatal in prior wars, it is arguable that this novel is more timely than ever. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 18:18, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Argument against war

message: Wasn't the book censored in the US at several times? 84.44.169.124 06:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the article on Dalton Trumbo, the author himself, stopped selling the 1939 book after Germany invaded Russia in 1941.  He agreed to sell it again starting in 1959. Two years later President/General Dwight D. Eisenhower warned against the military-industrial complex in 1961.204.80.61.110 17:31, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: censored?

message: :Image:Gothisgun.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:06, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Gothisgun.jpg

message: This article relies heavily on SparkNotes, perhaps more than the numerous references suggest. Yet it says almost nothing about the book's themes, where SparkNotes is eloquent. That is odd.
These three reviews must be useful. The first one is.
*http://www.unz.org/Pub/SaturdayRev-1939sep09-00005?View=PDF Saturday Review of Literature 1939-09-09 (pdf)
*http://www.lrb.co.uk/v22/n05/theo-tait/thats-democracy London Review of Books 2000-03-02 (partly for subscribers only)  
*http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2009/aug/16/johnny-got-his-gun-trumbo theguardian The Observer 2009-08-15
I have deleted Amazon.com whose (current) page for this book may add nothing and does not give the referenced publication date January 1 that I have corrected to September 3. --P64 (talk) 18:28, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resources 

message: We say this was published as a book September 1939 (true), published serially in March 1940 (?), and we put it in Categories for original serials. --P64 (talk) 01:31, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original serial? 

message: Was just reading comments about the song, on another site, and a guy who sounded like he was relaying known info contradicted someone's statement about the song One being based on the story -- instead saying they made the song, then found out about the movie, and incorporated it into the music video.  So is there a citation saying for sure it was based on the tale, or is it just a coincidence?  I don't see any concrete claims either here or on the song's page.  Someone please verify, or else rephrase to avoid saying it's based on the tale, only that the song's video makes use of the tale. Kilyle (talk) 11:15, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: YOU are "someone"!  Go for it, Kilyle.  No editorial staff, here, just folks like you.  rags (talk) 10:27, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Song actually based on story, or coincidence? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Johnny Got His Gun. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110526130636/http://www.shoutfactorystore.com/prod.aspx?pfid=5256993 to http://www.shoutfactorystore.com/prod.aspx?pfid=5256993
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:31, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Trumbo was certainly a communist, at least early in his career, and possibly until death.  He "joined the [American] Communist Party in 1943".  That stipulated, the subject of this article is not communism, nor does it promote, or even mention, communist ideas.  I suggest that it is inappropriate, therefore, to include in the lede this label of communist.  The story is antiwar, yes.  That doesn't equate to communist.  rags (talk) 11:07, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I see that the label was added less than two months ago.  I would speculate that there is no consensus.  We'll see.  It's worth considering  that the "commies", at least the Soviets, were our allies when this book was written, and at least until the end of the war.  rags (talk) 13:11, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Communist