Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football/Spain task force

message: If the WikiProject Football/Spain task force supports all Spanish clubs, leagues and competitions and associated articles (such as the Segunda División or Liga Adelante) could you please state in the discussion page of the Segunda División 2008-09 that the Spain Task Force supports this article?
Thank you!
Qampunen (talk) 20:21, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Segunda División 2008-09

message: If the WikiProject Football/Spain task force supports all Spanish clubs, leagues and competitions and associated articles (such as the Segunda División or Liga BBVA) could you please state of the discussion page of the Segunda División - 2007-08 that the Spain Task Force supports this article and include a rating?
Thank you!
Qampunen (talk) 22:50, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Segunda División 2007/2008

message: As you may have heard, we at the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial Team recently made some changes to the assessment scale, including the addition of a new level.  The new description is available at WP:ASSESS.
*The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.  
*The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.  
*A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.  
Each WikiProject should already have a new C-Class category at :Category:C-Class_articles.  If your project elects not to use the new level, you can simply delete your WikiProject's C-Class category and clarify any amendments on your project's assessment/discussion pages.  The bot is already finding and listing C-Class articles. 
Please leave a message with us if you have any queries regarding the introduction of the revised scheme.  This scheme should allow the team to start producing offline selections for your project and the wider community within the next year.  Thanks for using the Wikipedia 1.0 scheme! For the 1.0 Editorial Team, §hepBot (Disable) 21:52, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes to the WP:1.0 assessment scheme

message: Wikipedia 0.7 is a collection of English Wikipedia articles due to be released on DVD, and available for free download, later this year. The Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team has made an automated selection of articles for Version 0.7.
We would like to ask you to review the articles selected from this project. These were chosen from the articles with this project's talk page tag, based on the rated importance and quality. If there are any specific articles that should be removed, please let us know at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.7. You can also nominate additional articles for release, following the procedure at Wikipedia:Release Version Nominations. 
A list of selected articles with cleanup tags, sorted by project, is available. The list is automatically updated each hour when it is loaded. Please try to fix any urgent problems in the selected articles. A team of copyeditors has agreed to help with copyediting requests, although you should try to fix simple issues on your own if possible. 
We would also appreciate your help in identifying the version of each article that you think we should use, to help avoid vandalism or POV issues. These versions can be recorded at this project's subpage of User:SelectionBot/0.7. We are planning to release the selection for the holiday season, so we ask you to select the revisions before October 20. At that time, we will use an automatic process to identify which version of each article to release, if no version has been manually selected. Thanks! For the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team, SelectionBot 22:48, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia 0.7 articles have been selected for Football in Spain 

message: This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 03:19, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP 1.0 bot announcement 

message: The site bdfutbol.com is used in a lot of Spanish articles. Does it meet WP:RS ? Sandman888 (talk) 11:15, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  BDFutbol 

message: Please note Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of football players with domestic, continental and world titles re List of football players with domestic, continental and world titles. Apologies if this is the wrong place to post this. Ben MacDui 17:51, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  List AfD 

message: nominated List of FC Barcelona seasons for featured list removal here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Strawberry on Vanilla (talk) 14:42, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note 

message: After a recent request, I added WikiProject Football/Spain task force to the list of projects to compile monthly pageview stats for. The data is the same used by http://stats.grok.se/en/ but the program is different, and includes the aggregate views from all redirects to each page. The stats are at Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Spain task force/Popular pages.
The page will be updated monthly with new data. The edits aren't marked as bot edits, so they will show up in watchlists. You can view more results, request a new project be added to the list, or request a configuration change for this project using the toolserver tool. If you have any comments or suggestions, please let me know. Thanks! Mr.Z-man 21:24, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pageview stats 

message: As of January, the popular pages tool has moved from the Toolserver to Wikimedia Tool Labs. The code has changed significantly from the Toolserver version, but users should notice few differences. Please take a moment to look over your project's list for any anomalies, such as pages that you expect to see that are missing or pages that seem to have more views than expected. Note that unlike other tools, this tool aggregates all views from redirects, which means it will typically have higher numbers. (For January 2014 specifically, 35 hours of data is missing from the WMF data, which was approximated from other dates. For most articles, this should yield a more accurate number. However, a few articles, like ones featured on the Main Page, may be off).
Web tools, to replace the ones at tools:~alexz/pop, will become available over the next few weeks at toollabs:popularpages. All of the historical data (back to July 2009 for some projects) has been copied over. The tool to view historical data is currently partially available (assessment data and a few projects may not be available at the moment). The tool to add new projects to the bot's list is also available now (editing the configuration of current projects coming soon). Unlike the previous tool, all changes will be effective immediately. OAuth is used to authenticate users, allowing only regular users to make changes to prevent abuse. A visible history of configuration additions and changes is coming soon. Once tools become fully available, their toolserver versions will redirect to Labs. 
If you have any questions, want to report any bugs, or there are any features you would like to see that aren't currently available on the Toolserver tools, see the updated FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Mr.Z-bot (talk) (for Mr.Z-man) 05:06, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Popular pages tool update 

message: I have been working for time over the record page of Barcalona's team 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_FC_Barcelona_records_and_statistics 
my plan is to work after this over Real Madrid page and then Spanish football page(because it is gonna be way easier to do this after finishing real and barca pages. ) 
so please check it , there are few records i couldn't find a source for it so i left it marked there . and if anyone has a suggestion please let me know . thank you all 
Adnan (talk) 23:18, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Record pages : 

message: this article needs revision urgently, 
if they are able they will do so fast  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.150.35.182 (talk) 04:21, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  1997–98 La Liga 

message: this article needs revision urgently, if they are able they will do so fast  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.150.35.182 (talk) 05:57, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  1945-46 la liga bbva 

message: We – Community Tech – are happy to announce that the Popular pages bot is back up-and-running (after a one year hiatus)! You're receiving this message because your WikiProject or task force is signed up to receive the popular pages report. Every month,  will post at /Popular pages with a list of the most-viewed pages over the previous month that are within the scope of .
 
We've made some enhancements to the original report. Here's what's new:
* The pageview data includes both desktop and mobile data.
* The report will include a link to the pageviews tool for each article, to dig deeper into any surprises or anomalies.
* The report will include the total pageviews for the entire project (including redirects).
We're grateful to  for his original , and we wish his bot a happy robot retirement. Just as before, we hope the popular pages reports will aid you in understanding the reach of , and what articles may be deserving of more attention. If you have any questions or concerns please contact us at m:User talk:Community Tech bot.
Warm regards, the Community Tech Team 17:16, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Popular pages report 

message: Hello. A user is changing all templates about year in Spanish football.  Do you agree with the change? Xaris333 (talk) 20:46, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: No. Take :Template:1980–81 in English football and :Template:1980–81 in German football as examples. Both list the European competitions. @, your input is requested here. MYS77 ✉ 20:54, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: And Template:1980–81 in Scottish football, Template:1984–85 in Italian football, Template:2008–09 in Romanian football, Template:2011–12 in Russian football, Template:2006–07 in Serbian football and many, many others templates as examples. Xaris333 (talk) 21:09, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

text: I think that's all the issues, but Xaris333 also keeps adding article categories to these navboxes, which is against WP:CAT#T.  Only template categories should be added.  --woodensuperman 08:08, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: , as there's no consensus over it, we should stick to the original formatting (i.e. German, Croatian, Italian and Russian season templates). A red link is useful per WP:RED, as all those pages are relevant to Spanish football at all. However, I agree with your input that European competitions should not be included in these season articles. , any opinions? MYS77 ✉ 15:42, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Templates about year in Spanish football 

message: ...by people who know football jargon and follow the schedule?
The original author doesn't seem keen on adding clarifications. And there is time limit of 3 days altogether including the draft review. 
Thank you in advance. --Gryllida (talk) 10:08, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Could [[:n:El Clásico: Barcelona wins against Real Madrid with a count of 5:1|this]] possibly be improved? 

message: Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for information on WP1.0 web tool 

message: Hello,
I've added a new color to the pattern table to be related to [proposed] Segunda División B Pro, a new division that will start up in 2021. I chose a "light bronze" color to keep up the pattern and don't make that much changes into the club's pages, but if you think the color is not good, you can start a discussion here and we'll reach a consensus :) MYS77 ✉ 19:37, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Spanish federation named this new third level as :Primera División RFEF 2 days ago. Light bronze is not good, discard it, keep third level bronze. Santiago Claudio (talk) 13:05, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: If I had to choose, I prefer keeping the current level-3 color (current Segunda B) to the new Segunda RFEF that will be level 4 and the level-4 (current Tercera) for the new Tercera RFEF (next level 5). I mean, only thinking a new color for the new third tier (Primera RFEF). Asturkian (talk) 13:32, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  It goes away from the pattern already created. Tercera División always had an orange-type color even when it was the third tier. I'm trying to keep the pattern, in a way where it won't require editing all teams' season-to-season section.  yeah, but what color? Claudio is not agreeing on the light bronze, which is the only one I thought it could fit better to maintain this pattern. What color do you suggest then, Claudio? MYS77 ✉ 15:26, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe some kind of light blue (lighter than level 5/6}? Or a light purple? Would those meet MOS standards for accessibility (do any of the tables - I think colour blind people might see level 3/4 the same colour as level 7/8? ) [edit:] Hadn't seen the light bronze on the project page before posting but that looks OK to me as well, to be honest. Crowsus (talk) 16:46, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yeah, I chose this colour because it may be OK in the MOS (I don't get it that much TBH), and it's still using a sequence to gold / silver / (light) bronze, kind of a podium... Let's wait for the other guys' opinions. MYS77 ✉ 17:53, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I like it. It continues the sequence and respects the color of the 2ªB for the new 2ª RFEF, that is going to be played in a similar format. Asturkian (talk) 19:21, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  New color in pattern 

message: There are some teams, e.g. CF Peralada, that are only reserve teams during a few number of years. I think it is not the best way to keep the season-by-season tables as currently. Do you have any idea for improving it? Asturkian (talk) 13:35, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I think if we join them all into one, it'll be confusing. What do you propose? MYS77 ✉ 15:27, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  Maybe, in cases as Peralada, this could be a solution. Asturkian (talk) 17:36, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  Maybe, but it's a little strange, don't you think? What about:
Season   	Tier	Division	Place	Copa del Rey
1928-1970	—   	Regional	—    	
1970/71  	6   	2ª Reg. 	12th 	
Of course, we wouldn't actually make this on 1970/71, because reserve teams were allowed to play in the Copa del Rey until 1991. MYS77 ✉ 02:56, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

text: It's ok. Asturkian (talk) 16:42, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

text: Added in 3.1.1. at the main page, plus updated it on Peralada's article. It really looks better than having those columns splitting the years. MYS77 ✉ 20:48, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Season to season in reserve teams 

message: Notice:  There is a discussion at Talk:Benidorm CF#Should this page cover the current team, the past team(s), or all 3? What should its title be? relevant to this task force. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 16:21, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notice of discussion relevant to this task force - [[Benidorm CF]] 

message: Hello English speaking friends, I'm new as an editor at The English Wikipedia and I want to introduce myself, I'm Araceli G. and I work for LaLiga. I will try to provide all the objective data about this Spanish competition. 
LaLiga is making an effort to use the appropriate denomination. The official statutes, in its chapter 1 and article 1, establish the official denomination as "Liga Nacional de Futbol Profesional".https://assets.laliga.com/assets/2020/07/23/originals/b9314591e0726340127ba1420a92713a.pdf
The name "Liga de Fútbol Profesional" was abandoned in 2015, and its acronym "LFP" has been widely used in the media and is incorrect and confusing because it is the same acronym as the French league, which is officially called "LFP". Therefore, we are trying to ensure that the correct names are applied: either "LaLiga" or "la liga" or "Liga Nacional de Fútbol Profesional". This is going to be my main work in Wikipedia, and what we want to defend from this sports institution.
Thank you all for your cooperation and understanding,--AraceliLaLiga (talk) 12:40, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Liga Nacional de Fútbol Profesional"