lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Email fraud

message: This article really needs some work.  It's a notable topic, but the way it's written and organized, it doesn't make much sense.  I'm on the fence about whether the example e-mail in the article is useful or not.  I did remove some POV and unencyclopedic annotations from it.  If it does stay, it needs some formatting work so it stands out from the text of the rest of the article.  Weathermandan 22:08, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup Tag October 2007
Talk:Taranee Cook

message: Changed Taranee's parents nationalities from 'Asian-American and African-American' to "Of Asian and African descent," as they are all Italian, and therefor cannot be Asian-American or African-American.Lililedger (talk) 23:30, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes Made

message: It is impossible for Taranee's parents to be Asian-American OR African-American because Taranee is Italian. (Or French, in the cartoon.) This needs to be fixed. (I've never heard the term Asian-Italian, but I'm sure it applies.) Lililedger (talk) 15:16, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Nationalities
Talk:Drugs for Neglected Diseases Initiative

message: This article has over half its sections empty. Until they have some content added, I request the ability to delete these sections, as they add absolutely nothing to the article other than noting that they can be given but are not. 180.200.140.188 (talk) 11:18, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trimming 
Talk:Genital schistosomiasis

message: Appears to be from  word for word however editor is likely the same as the author. This sentence is an example "indicating that genital lesions do not undergo a change with age, or that women by the age of 20 have already passed into a chronic state of infection." It states that copyright is owned by The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. User:WhatamIdoing thoughts? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 04:25, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: That would require a round of OTRS paperwork.  Is there any chance of contacting the editor in question?  WhatamIdoing (talk) 04:45, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Email is not on. Have left a message. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 04:50, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The whole article needs to re-written pretty much from scratch because so much of it is heavy with medical jargon and complex wording. So, in this situation starting from a blank slate without the copyright violation material could be for the best. Sydney Poore/FloNight♥♥♥♥ 15:47, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Since the copyright violation goes back to the earliest content in the article, there is not good version to revert to.  If there is no objection, I'll volunteer today to make a quick short article re-write starting with a basic stub. Sydney Poore/FloNight♥♥♥♥ 15:55, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Have redirect to schistosomiasis as that article covers it mostly anyway. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 16:45, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Copy and paste
Talk:Amber Moore

message: This article appears to have been written by a fan, there is no structure, terrible bias, poorly written, and inaccurate information. This user needs to stop editing pages in this manner and this particular page needs to be completely overhauled. Pronto.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Garciab006 (talk • contribs) 04:49, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.  Each storyline does not need its own section.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.227.85.172 (talk) 11:58, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Gummatous

message: Gummatous is an adjective, and thus not normally a topic in wikipedia.
This section ought to be merged with "gumma," syphilis, or Treponema pallidum, or else be eliminated.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.54.95.208 (talk) 17:53, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Gummatous
Talk:Ross River fever

message: After consulting some online authorities (incl. a New South Wales Department of Health advice on the subject) I have not found anything to suggest that RRV is communicable directly from person to person. All the material suggests that RRV is not contagious from close human contact, but can only be contracted via mosquitoes. This article should be edited to more clearly reflect this fact. I've reworded the article to clearly state that the virus is not contagious. The changes I've made reflect the authorities already referenced by the paragraph.  121.210.84.197 (talk) 07:05, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:
Talk:National Airspace System

message: Update information on page as it is a bit outdated. 
Figure for total controllers seems off, also needs to have more about navigation facilities and other components of the NAS. Rojas.jorge96 (talk) 21:13, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I find nothing in the article that's outdated. To match the FAA's definition of the NAS, it requires expansion to include the ground and satellite components, but that's not outdated, just incomplete.Altaphon (talk) 06:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs update
Talk:Non-gonococcal urethritis

message: Apparently diet can also be a factor in NGU. (Also referred to as nonspecific urethritis prior to confirmation of a non-gonococcal source.) High quantities of acid (juices, sodas) can occasionally cause inflammation.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.109.55.138 (talk) 01:52, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional Irritating Factors 

message: Looks like randomised pseudo-medical technobabble: "A completed "November 19, 2009" Phase II Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Double-Blind 4-Arm Trial for the Treatment of Non-Gonococcal Urethritis (NGU): Doxycycline (Plus or Minus Tinidazole) Versus Azithromycin (Plus or Minus Tinidazole)."  ajs  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.96.59.93 (talk) 09:59, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does this mean FGS ?!! 

message: Does the definition cover all causes that are not caused by gonococcal infection, or is the definition inclusive only of those causes that are not STI related? The article fails to state, and I cannot find a defintion that also excludes other STI related micro-organisms other than gonococal infection 66.90.153.184 (talk) 02:39, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Have you read the article especially the section called "Causes"? Ruslik_Zero 20:56, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Definition
Talk:Denel Dynamics Bateleur

message: Why is this article in many US Military categories? Is there anything at all about this aircraft that is in any way connected to the US - other than that it looks quite similar to the MQ-1 Predator of course? Roger 10:50, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A previous editor had mistakenly enabled the US-task-force option in the Military History wikiProject infobox, which added the article to all the relevant categories. I've changed the option back to its correct value. — Impi 11:49, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  US Military categories?
Talk:Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis

message: The following sentence is grammatically incomplete:
The subsequent damage to the bronchial wall caused by proteolytic enzymes released by the immune cells and toxins released by the fungi results in bronchiectasis, most pronounced in the central parts of the airways.
It is missing a linking verb, and since I did not write it, I can hardly know where the linking verb should go. I would assume it's a missing "is" to replace the comma, but that's not the only possibility. --75.63.55.31 (talk) 01:36, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does this mean, internet? 

message: Is APBA a type of eosinophilic pneumonia or not?  In the intro paragraph it seems that it only resembles an eosinophilic pneumonia, later it says it is an eosinophlic pneumonia  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.88.83.56 (talk) 02:50, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Eosinophilic pneumonia is a symptom of ABPA; ABPA is not a type of pneumonia, it is a hypersensitivity disorder. --—Cyclonenim | Chat  16:08, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistency 

message: I shall review the "Pathophysiology" section. Axl ¤ [Talk] 14:25, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks , very much appreciated. This section was first on my list, I realise the rest of it needs improving and it's on my to-do list! I think I've made the changes you've brought up; if you think there's anything not quite done let me know :) --—Cyclonenim | Chat  15:24, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  You're welcome! The article is already improving. Let me know if/when you want me review the article again. Axl ¤ [Talk] 21:39, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've rewritten the diagnosis section in one big go, which I suspect will be prone to a lot of errors. Also needs refs expanding significantly but I'll work on that tomorrow. Could you provide thoughts when you have time? No rush! Many thanks. --—Cyclonenim | Chat  16:34, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

text: I suggest that the second sentence in subsection "Clinical suspicion" should be moved up, out of the subsection altogether. Axl ¤ [Talk] 21:22, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  --—Cyclonenim | Chat  10:47, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pathophysiology review 

message: From "Diagnosis", paragraph 2: "Poorly-controlled asthma is a common finding, with a case series only finding 19% of ABPA patients with well-controlled asthma." I don't think that a quote about a single case series particularly helpful. Also, this is complicated by the issue of possible inclusion of non-asthmatic patients, and use of oral/inhaled glucocorticoids. Axl ¤ [Talk] 15:24, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diagnosis
Talk:Cryptococcus gattii

message: do we know that lobectomy is the preferred procedure, and, therefore ought we to be specifying such? wedge resection?Toyokuni3 (talk) 22:46, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Lobectomy

message: From an article on NPR the first Oregon case is said to be in 2007 (not 2010), and a Duke researcher's report is said to be available in the article as well, which may be of interest to some who work on this article. BTW, hats off to all you busy little beavers that work on articles such as this!  Having just heard of this rare disease today (it was mentioned at my gardening forum), I wondered if it might be listed here.  Well, not only listed, but so complete and up to date to boot! 
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=126198896&ps=cprs  Gandydancer (talk) 13:43, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: 2007 Case in Oregon

message: This article would be improved by including examples of the mode of transmission. It is, according to the article, not contagious from person to person. It is inhaled. Then what is it inhaled from? Does it live on plant matter? Does it live in murky water? Is it transmitted by insect bites? Someone must know. Please post it.   Grandma Roses (talk) 21:46, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Not contagious'? 

message: Would an unborn child be infected if the mother was?  My friend has just been diagnosed with this fungus and her baby had to be delivered by c-section.  The baby had to then be resucitated, but is doing ok now.  Is there a possiblity that the fungus would cross the placenta? 203.39.148.62 (talk) 02:02, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unborn child 

message: As a general science news item:
*
The original study:
*
Peaceray (talk) 19:25, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Study suggests that the 1964 Alaska Earthquake tsunami spread C. gattii to the Pacific NW
Talk:Christopher Hughes II

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:20, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Rhythm of Love (Yes song)

message: I'm changing the "next single" info from "Big Generator" to "Lift Me Up"; the Atlantic Records discographies I've found all show that "Rhythm of Love" was the second and final single released from Big Generator. If the song "Big Generator" was released in any form, it must have been a promo-only single sent to radio stations. ("Final Eyes" and "Shoot High, Aim Low" charted on the Mainstream Rock chart as album tracks, but weren't released as singles.) 28bytes (talk) 20:43, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Next single
Talk:Bonnie McKechnie

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://soapcentral.com/atwt/whoswho/bonnie.php 2006 archive (prior to article creation). Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  NortyNort  (Holla) 01:35, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Lucinda "Lucy" Montgomery

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.soapcentral.com/atwt/whoswho/lucy.php (See archive from a month before the article's creation: http://web.archive.org/web/20070513145523/http://www.soapcentral.com/atwt/whoswho/lucy.php). Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  NortyNort  (Holla) 08:57, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Josh Snyder (As the World Turns)

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.soapcentral.com/atwt/whoswho/josh.php?printonly=yes. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  MER-C 07:08, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:James Stenbeck

message: This article completely skips James' disappearance and assumed death in the early 80s and his return in late 1986. Not to mention all the story that transpired between 1986 and 2008. I realize this went through some considerable trimming, and a lot of soap articles need to be way more concise, but....wow, this is missing a good 60-70 percent of the character's history. 2603:8001:2A00:7428:B440:DF6D:3E09:A3AA (talk) 20:00, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing huge chunk of info
Talk:Running in the Family (song)

message: There seem to be different versions, see lyrics:
*common version: http://www.songtexte.com/songtext/level-42/running-in-the-family-3bd46484.html
*alternate text: http://www.songtextemania.com/running_in_the_family_original_lyrics_songtext_level_42.html
Anybody got more info on this?
--mmg (talk) 20:56, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Different Versions
Talk:Nonvenereal endemic syphilis

message: the linked article for Pinta includes treatment which it says is applicable to this disease as well.142.163.195.205 (talk) 17:52, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

message: This article was initially categorized based on scheme outlined at WP:DERM:CAT. kilbad (talk) 02:42, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article categorization 

message: *https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3910905/
*https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3812090/
*http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S156713481100445X
Barbara (WVS) (talk) 10:00, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: more
Talk:Pitted keratolysis

message: Despite the image on the head of the page. Why its still no mention of it, despite looking unsettling to us? CMIIW. i hope this can addressed fast. Thanks. 2404:8000:1027:F2A:2C:9746:1BB0:6B94 (talk) 03:03, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tryphophobia?
Talk:List of foodborne illness outbreaks

message: Geez, it makes me want to give up food altyogether. Spoonkymonkey (talk) 21:25, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point -- I'll do it now. Cgingold (talk) 14:26, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article overlaps heavily with List of foodborne illness outbreaks by death toll. Given that this article is less complete, I suggest this article be merged into List of foodborne illness outbreaks by death toll. The few other items that would not merge easily in that article body table could be included in the see also section.Dialectric (talk) 20:05, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal: Merge to ''List of foodborne illness outbreaks by death toll''
Talk:Phytohaemagglutinin

message: The two links that reference FDA are no longer good.
The information concerning the toxicity of beans may be inaccurate.
If no one has a source on bean toxicity I think it should be removed.
Jimmeyjazz (talk) 01:44, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The Flesch–Kincaid grade level formula is simplistic to the point of uselessness. Its only parameters are the ratios words/sentences and syllables/words, neither of which are good measures for difficulty. For example, if ‘the ratios’ had been removed from the previous sentence, it would have gotten a a better score, but it would have been less readable. The sentence you quote is long, yes, but this is not a problem since all the parts of the sentence string onto each other like beads on a string, logically moving from one concept to the next. There is also no good evidence that long words hamper readability all that much. Sure, in theory rare words are longer on average and you learn them later, but once you know them they're words like any other and adults know quite a lot of words. Common, but long, words and long words which are explained within the sentence itself make the Flesch-Kincaid score even more useless.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.114.146.117 (talk) 09:38, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
Talk:Taenia solium

message: This article is a failure. It fails to provide important facts in a simple language at the top.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.226.36.147 (talk) 13:07, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not for the Layman 

message: in the category section at the bottom of the page, one of the categories listed is "Magical Girls." 75.95.105.156 (talk) 05:30, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  what is this i don't even? 

message: Is this true, seeing as the article says it's common all over the world? Elle vécut heureuse à jamais (Be eudaimonic!) 11:50, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  critically endangered? 

message: The section on pathogenicity should be moved to the disease page, but I don't know if it should be moved to the Taeniasis or to the Cystericosis page (or both) as it seems to deal with both (they are quite similar). EvM-Susana (talk) 21:59, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: * No, should not be moved. Each species of Taenia has distinctive effect, we know less aboout T. saginata and T. asiatica. Instead the pathogenicity can be simply elaborated individually in taeniasis and cysticercosis. Chhandama (talk) 03:12, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move the section on pathogenicity to either Taeniasis or Cystericosis page? 

message: Is for the disease specifically thus IMO this section is better in the disease article rather than the organism article. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 08:07, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Prevention and control

message: Pork tapewam may reach 12 meters length! The main problem is the CNS involvement (e.g. cysticercosis of the brain) that may be fatal. Diagnostically a brain CT or MRI may help, but a biopsy sample of a subcutaneous nodule or specific antibodies detection in blood are needed to confirm the diagnosis. 84.205.227.5 (talk) 22:51, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  It can be very long! Also, brain involvement is a severe complication

message: I am currently dealing with an IP address who is trying to change the word faecal (three times in the article) to fecal. However, even after notifying the IP about disruptive editing, he reverted my edit. I am currently choosing not to revert any more of his edits out of fear that I could get punished for edit warring. Should the term faeces be spelled with or without an a? Thanks! Train of Knowledge (Talk|Contribs) 06:42, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Have put a 'British English' tag on page that can just be referred to.--Iztwoz (talk) 07:43, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  There is an IP respelling faecal to fecal even though I have reverted the IP twice. 

message: Taenia 202.53.4.18 (talk) 16:05, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taenia sollum 

message: Life of tapeworm  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 154.160.19.209 (talk) 12:07, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Animals husbandry