lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Perfluorooctanoic acid

message: I've been a software developer all my life and don't have a whole lot of chemistry training, but when something looks wrong or appears that it is wrong, I notice, e.g. I noticed that the Wikimedia Commons SVG image of the Seal of the U.S. Srate of Nevada is  missing one star, as opposed to the correct one with 36 stars. So maybe I missed something or my lack of chemical knowledge has made me misunderstand. But I'm curious. The main article shows a 3D molecule image and a molecular chain drawing depicting a string of 15 fluorine atoms, two oxygen atoms, and one hydrogen atom, i.e. F15HO2, which is fine if correct. But the actual chemical formula is shown as C8HF15O2. Okay, fine, the hydrogen goes earlier in the molecular chain. But, as the sating goes, "what's wrong with this picture?" Obviously, given the title, you know my response: Where's the carbon? Neither of these images show any carbon at all. So, either (1) the image is missing some (the catbon) atoms (this was my guess); (2) the formula does not have carbon in it (seems possible since the name isn't carboperfluorooctanoic acid or perfluorocarbooctanoic acid as I would expect); or (3) I'm completely wrong and both are right. I'd like to learn which so that I may understand better. 
"Understanding of things by me is only made possible by people — who read my comments — like you."
Thank you.  Paul Robinson (Rfc1394) (talk) 18:54, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The carbon atoms are not missing in the formula. "Skeletal formulas are the standard notation for more complex organic molecules. In this type of diagram, first used by the organic chemist Friedrich August Kekulé von Stradonitz, the carbon atoms are implied to be located at the vertices (corners) and ends of line segments rather than being indicated with the atomic symbol C. Hydrogen atoms attached to carbon atoms are not indicated: each carbon atom is understood to be associated with enough hydrogen atoms to give the carbon atom four bonds."  JimRenge (talk) 20:37, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where's the carbon? 

message: Just a friendly reminder that if you ever find yourself writing something like "An in vitro study using porcine cells" to talk about health effects, you're probably making a mistake.  The goal is to Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Medicine-related articles#Cite sources, don't describe them. WhatamIdoing (talk) 16:42, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, WP:MEDSAY ! Bon courage (talk) 16:48, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Health effects
Talk:Mohammed Bijeh

message: What is the reference "The New Criminologist"? Is this a book, a TV program, or what? 24.131.12.228 05:07, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Mohammed Bijeh isn't Tehran Desert Vampire beacuse he lives in pakdasht and Tehran Desert Vampire(and Niht Vampire) is gholamreza kordan Amir (talk) 23:33, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Tehran Desert Vampire

message: If you translate the Farsi(?) version of this article into English using Google Translator, it says he killed "more than 17" children and "3 adults", while the English article says he killed 16 boys and 2 adults. Which one is correct? Billy7 (talk) 12:03, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong information?

message: The article is Mohammaed Bijeh.  The Biography section gives another name, Muhammad Basjee.  Could we get some clarification of this and put the different names in the lead section, please?  Kirby777 (talk) 01:13, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  True name 

message: Mohammad Bijeh was born on May 17, 1984, while her date is incorrectly stated as 1982 Please correct the date on his Persian page and change it to 1363 instead of 1361, which is wrong سهراب بارسایی (talk) 15:05, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong date of birth 

message: The sources in the lead fail to verify the dates given as the span of crimes. I've fully protected the article for a week so that you all can find some reliable sources to validate these claims. Anarchyte (talk) 07:12, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Span of crimes 
Talk:London Corresponding Society

message: Tidied and expanded a bit.  The trades they did are interesting: separate from the growth of the factory system.  --GwydionM 21:15, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Can something be both?  Cannonmc (talk) 09:27, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "moderate radical" 

message: Sheffield was not a branch of the LCS. Sheffield was the first corresponding society (this is acknowledged by Hardy in the papers; Manchester also pre-dates LCS). If anything London was a branch of the Sheffield Corresponding Society! Sheffield had far more members and was the inspiration for other societies (including London). The movement was not something confined to London, and certainly did not originate there. The movement sprang from unrepresented northern working-class cities.
I would perhaps suggest changing the page title to "Corresponding Societies" and including the wider (geographically speaking) history, or at the very least, creating a new article for Sheffield along with an edit on this page. This is an area which is quite well documented (for obvious reasons), and should be easy for someone with the time and inclination to fact check (unfortunately I lack both time and inclination at present).
I do appreciate much of the subsequent legal history, which was specific to the LCS (I have no issue with the middle part of the article; Key Activities and Government Response) being unique to London, and perhaps the prominence of those events does warrant London having a unique Corresponding Society article, but to airbrush Sheffield out of the picture in the other sections (especially "Early influences and foundation", and "Legacy") is inaccurate in the extreme.
I don't have time right now to find a bunch of primary sources (apologies), but, for anyone who is interested, as a primer I would recommend something like this: http://www.historyhome.co.uk/c-eight/18reform/sheffcorr.htm
Bullblade (talk) 08:44, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Sheffield branch"
Talk:Turckheim

message: History
Türkheim became better known through the battle that took place there between the French under Turenne and the Imperials on the 6th of January 1675. The Imperials, surprised by the French move in mid-winter, lost despite the help given by the city which tried to slow the French down. This let Turenne to let his soldateska loose on the city. It was looted and sacked for two weeks. The remaining inhabitants put to the sword or hanged from the trees. Neither women nor children were spared. Most of the population had escaped in the night of the 5th to the 6th of January through every opening in the walls, it is said, at the approach of the French which brought them the surname "Lochschlüpfer" (hole-slider). Those who remained were essentially the poor, the old, sick and the women. The children and even the babies are massacred. The women raped, and when they resisted, their breasts were cut off. The churches were not spared either and the bells destroyed. Of all this the archives conserve the remembrance.
:::Does anyone know more about this? Or have a source? I used to live in Turckheim and would LOVE to learn more! ThanksLazulilasher (talk) 21:16, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old talk 
Template talk:Userbox Ex-Wikipedia

message: Won't the term R.I.P. discourage people from using this userbox? --unforgettableid | talk to me 21:26, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's good - but you forgot to put the word "user" when you made the edit, making it "This has decided to leave Wikipedia for good." Click on the preview button next time! ;-) –-  kungming·2 | (Talk·Contact) 06:11, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry about that. :) Anonymous_anonymous_Have a Nice Day 14:37, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There should be an option to insert "for good", maybe as {, where  would be an additional message? Yeah. 24.145.222.85 12:56, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

message: Hello, fellow editors ... after discussions with Some Other Editor, I have come to the conclusion that the word "user" should be replaced by "editor" to more correctly reflect the wetware's relationship to the system we know as Wikipedia ... if you revert it, please discuss it here.
Happy Editing! —  14:25, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "user" to "editor"
Talk:Lockring

message: Am I correct in thinking that this page is talking about bicycle parts? Context would be nice. Uucp 21:26, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

message: The title of the article is "Lockring" and the article uses "lock ring". What's correct? John Link (talk) 01:10, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Lockring" or "lock ring"?
Talk:Hypoxidaceae

message: Since there are only seven genera, you might just go ahead and list them in the article. --DanielCD 21:27, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Yichud

message: I added to this page. I translated from the hebrew 217.132.167.49 21:31, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition 

message: The first sentence of this article is confusing.  Literally, Yichud does not mean "prohibition of seclusion"; it means "seclusion".  This is why when couples seclude themselves after a wedding, it is called a Yichud.  However, the Law dealing with proper behavior between unmarried women and men is usually not referred to as "prohibition of Yichud", but simply, "Yichud".  Hence the confusion.  Can someone who knows more about this than me edit this accordingly?  Perhaps they could explain the differences in usage.
:some time ago the name of the artile was just "yichud" I don't know when or who changed it, but I think that is should be changed back.  Jon513 19:30, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition of Yichud 

message: The article contained an error, there is no prohibition of yichud with a niddah, unless she is an unconsumated bride. Otherwise it would be forbidden to be in yichud with one's own wife, and one of the parents would be required to move for two weeks each month.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.114.219.195 (talk) 01:08, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Niddah 

message: This has no connection with the article.  I think someone was trying to be comical.  It's inappropriate to illustrate a serious issue, adultery, with a lady miming,  "Shhh...". (By "inappropriate" I mean it hurts my feelings.) Will someone please remove this photo and the caption.  Thank you.
Labellesanslebete (talk) 10:11, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo of Lucille Ball and Desi Arnaz
Talk:Tengri tagh

message: Removed: 
:Tengri tagh or Tengri mountins is one of the longest mountins in Central Asia.It is translated as Tian Shan into Chinese from Uyghur language.Total length of 2500Km,the main branch starts from Khumul(Qumul,Ha Mi in Chinese) and lasts west to Tashkent.
This is another name for the Tian Shan (which the author Barat realises, as he/she altered "Tian Shan" on that page to read "Tengri tagh"). SiGarb | Talk 21:31, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Colour Genie

message: I wrote a review of the Colour Genie for Computing Today magazine in 1983. It is online at:
http://www.webweavers.co.nz/system-80/hardware_colour%20genie_review.htm
A shorter and slightly earlier review, from Your Computer magazine, is at:
http://www.gondolin.org.uk/hchof/reviews/yc-colour-genie.html
Sng 21:37, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [I wrote a review]

message: It doesn't seem so.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.193.172.200 (talk) 07:46, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Does its CPU really differ from the TRS80 one ?

message: Have removed uncited claims added in this edit that:-
: The company went bankrott, when its founder leave it with a suitcase of money. TCS in Germany St, Augustin, near Bonn went bankrott later.
The company has its own article- EACA- and having this smack in the middle of a description intended to focus on the computer itself is out of place. These claims would still require citation if they were to go in the company article.
Ubcule (talk) 20:49, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed uncited claims focused on company, not computer
Talk:Hi-yi-yi

message: The list of islands is not mine, it was taken from the Rhinogradentia article. Can anyone confirm  that it is accurate?  Thanks.... Jorge Stolfi 21:44, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Accuracy of island names

message: Are the variant spellings from other languages? Jorge Stolfi 21:44, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure there are. In the original edition Steiner gave the following German variants: Heieiei-Archipel, Heidadeifi, Ausadausa, Mairúvili, Lautengako (that's the one you misspelled with a T), Launanoia, Mitadina, and Isasofa (in english Esusoffa; this island is missing in your list). Further, Mt. Showunnoonda is Schauanunda and Mt. Kotsbowsy is Kozobausi. - Konunanautupeih (talk) 16:51, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Variant spellings

message: This isn't that notable in itself. It could be a subsection of Rhinogradentia called "habitat and distribution" or some such. FunkMonk (talk) 02:19, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I have to agree with this. I definitely think the hoax/books/fictional species is notable, but Hi-yi-yi is most certainly one of the less important details in the "Steiner universe". I'm going to try to make some improvements to Rhinogradentia and have somewhat boldly merged the content from this article into that one. --— Rhododendrites talk |  01:04, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Rhinogradentia?
Talk:Landing Zone X-Ray

message: Unfortunately when I uploaded my file to the web host I sent to, it uploaded a blank photo, so I need someone who has expeirence with ariel photos to take a shot of the place and link it to here. Thanks! --Shenshuai 17:30, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  IMAGE NOT FOUND 

message: I just restarted the article, but I'm running a bit short on air (man, it's stuffy in this room!) so I need to go out to take a walk. Maybe someone who has BEEN THERE (to the site) can expand on this for me... right about now... --Shenshuai 17:30, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restarting the page 

message: Is the area still known as "Landing Zone X-Ray"? I thought that was simply a US Army code name. Does the Vietnamese government recognize it as a name for the area?Michael Dorosh 17:44, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Landing Zone X-Ray Designation 

message: *LZ X-ray, which I ran across a couple of weeks ago. Someone put quite a bit of work into it. I did a little editing on it, and created some alternate capitalization redirects, since the original article was capitalized as Lz x-ray. Anyway, I just found this article by accident. Perhaps that article can be merged into this one. Crockspot 00:12, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  There is another article
Talk:Slater & Gordon

message: It appears as if someone from the S&G PR machine is turning this site into an advertisement.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.104.116.205 (talk) 14:21, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertising
Talk:Fus'ha (language)

message: This more properly belongs with Modern Standard or perhaps with Varieties of Arabic. (Collounsbury 21:53, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Why is this a seperate entry?

message: Even though I reverted a major edit (because it was done without discussion), I think most of this can be deleted or transferred to the articles on Modern Standard Arabic or Classical Arabic. Leave a paragraph explaining the term and may be some links. Your thoughts? --Drmaik 06:59, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  leave a paragraph and put anyhting worthwhile in MSA or CA? 

message: What's the point in a transliteration system if one just creates another? The Standard transliteration, Fus'ha, should be used in any general reference. The Strict transliteration, Fuṣ'ḥa, should be used in conjunction with the Arabic text. Please refer to Wikipedia:Manual of Style (Arabic). Madeinsane 19:52, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transliteration?
Talk:San Bartolo (Maya site)

message: The ruins are not in Totonicapan splitting pages.Obina 21:54, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

message: Is it possible to add latitude and longitude of this site?
As the site has not been opened to the public, adding Lat/Long would put it at greater risk of looting.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.220.114.26 (talk) 21:08, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lat/Long 

message: What are "Suns of Sunrise'? The term is unfamiliar.77.162.130.139 (talk) 00:01, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suns of Sunrise 

message: shouldn't this article use the ever-so-slightly-more culturally-neutral terms CE - Current Era - and BCE, instead of the increasingly outdated BC and AD?  What do most Archaeological site pages on Wikipedia tend to use?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.201.39.59 (talk) 05:48, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: See WP:ERA for wikipedia's guidance on era notation. Either is acceptable, & in an effort to prevent tedious edit wars over it we usually just stick with whatever notation the first major contributors to the article decided to use. --cjllw ʘ TALK 05:53, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  BC/AD -> BCE/CE
Talk:Internal fertilization

message: This article describes internal fertilization in sponges. Is this an error? Jarble (talk) 20:55, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sponges
Talk:Bromley, West Midlands

message: In 1057, Earl Leofric seems to have died both here and at Kings Bromley. (RJP 22:00, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, it's a bit confusing! I've taken out the mention of Earl Leofric since it seems to contradict other articles and there are no sources cited to verify the claim. Kevin Judson 19:17, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Chisel (band)

message: The article reads more like a fan page; the language needs to be made more neutral. --Mel Etitis  (Μελ Ετητης) 23:10, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPoV 

message: Why'd they break up or stop playing or whatever? --AW 19:51, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Breakup? 
Talk:Gongche notation

message: More careful research confirms that the correct pronunciation of "工尺" should be gōngchě, e.g. . Therefore I request a move from "Gongchi Notation" to "Gongche Notation". -- Felix Wan 22:03, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah gōngchě is definitely correct. LDHan 20:20, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should be Gongche 

message: How is it that the "scale" of Gongche or Chinese music and the Standard or western music exactly match?  Do they both originate from the same source? and What is this "source"?
Does it mean why people say that music is an universal language is actually true?  That human's perception of sound waves simply "strike the same chord", way back when both Chinese and Western music evolved?
Just puzzling for me.
Cartonlao (talk) 20:47, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question about Gongche notation and Chinese music and the standard notation and western music. 

message: The article says that the words sung in regional operas are "pronounced in an approximation of Modern Standard Chinese pronunciation" which appears rather dubious to me. They appear more likely to be approximations of earlier non-standard Mandarin, since practically no one was educated in Modern Standard Chinese for the great length of the traditions the article is talking about. These appear more likely to be literary readings of the characters. Please verify the claim in the article. Thanks! -Devin Ronis (d.s.ronis) (talk) 23:30, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. In Cantonese opera, bureaucrat characters tend to approximate Southern versions of Mandarin. E.g. 講 is not rendered 'jiang' (Wade-Giles chiang), but instead 'giang' (Wade-Giles kiang). 60.228.15.158 (talk) 14:43, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Gongche notation#Pronunciation|Section 1.3 Pronunciation]]
Talk:Hillsboro, North Dakota

message: This is not the place to air your grievances about the school. That is all.
165.234.187.80 22:10, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Does "most in-state colleges and universities" sound about right? The way this is going, might as well make a seperate "Hillsboro High School" page...  LilianPhoebs 03:16, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: From what I have been witness to, it does seem like there have been several negative things posted about the Hillsboro High School over time.  While I'm not arguing that those negative things do or don't exist, I think the 'Education' section needs to sound a bit more unbiased.  Please see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view for more information about how articles should be written from a neutral stance.  As far as making a seperate page for the High School, I would greatly advise against it.  Most users are not tolerant of individual pages for individual schools.  Some large school districts do have their own articles, but an individual school...no matter how big or small...isn't usually deserving of a seperate article.  --MatthewUND(talk) 09:26, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. It was a sarcastic comment. Sorry for the misunderstanding.LilianPhoebs 18:37, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Thrasybulus

message: I've reverted the change in the number of T's children.  If someone has a source for there being three, please provide it, but my sources said there were two. --RobthTalk 15:17, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Number of Children

message: This article has several issues with meeting the current FA criteria.  There is significant uncited text, especially in the historical opinion section, and the first paragraph of the early life section appears to be WP:OR drawing conclusions about his personal life from brief facts in primary sources.  This needs further attention, or it may go to WP:FAR. Hog Farm  Bacon 05:57, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I have noticed this one long ago, but the FAR process is so heavy that I haven't touched it. Imo, it can't be saved without rewriting it, and should be delisted. T8612 (talk) 12:54, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:URFA/2020]]