Talk:Baku Khanate

message: This concerns POV tag cleanup.  Whenever an POV tag is placed, it is necessary to also post a message in the discussion section stating clearly why it is thought the article does not comply with POV guidelines, and suggestions for how to improve it.  This permits discussion and consensus among editors.  From WP tag policy: Drive-by tagging is strongly discouraged. The editor who adds the tag must address the issues on the talk page, pointing to specific issues that are actionable within the content policies, namely Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia:Verifiability, Wikipedia:No original research and Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. Simply being of the opinion that a page is not neutral is not sufficient to justify the addition of the tag. Tags should be added as a last resort.  Better yet, edit the topic yourself with the improvements.  This statement is not a judgement of content, it is only a cleanup of frivolously and/or arbitrarily placed tags.  No discussion, no tag.Jjdon (talk) 19:03, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV tag 

message: For making more understandable for western readers , can we add a sentence(s) to the article that compare western noblity like Counts and Marquess to khans ? --Alborz Fallah (talk) 18:22, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think we need a source for that, otherwise it would be an OR. If there's a source that draws such parallels, we can quote it. Grandmaster 06:40, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, as in corresponding pages (Equivalent non-Western titles of Marquess and Equivalents of the title Count) ,no source is mentioned , I think that is possible to write it in the article . Albeit that is OR , and I know that , but if that OR is undisputed , it can be practically neglected .  Anyway , there are some rather weak sources that can be mentioned : ( TITLES AT THE CAPITAL : HOW TO ADDRESS PUBLIC OFFICERS. The New York Times,1890  or ).Overall , again that seems to be not so important , but rather helping ; but if you think it is better no to include it , then so be it ! --Alborz Fallah (talk) 07:46, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think at the moment it is not so important. If we have strong sources that draw parallels between the nobility titles in Iran and the West, then we can cite them. Grandmaster 05:22, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Count]] 

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 02:44, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]] 

message: Well, it was spoken atleast by some people, you can add armenian too, because baku armenians also formed a bunch of the populatio 2003:EA:4F07:87FC:1087:757D:D1B8:5249 (talk) 14:45, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can we add azerbaijani as a language spoken there?