lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Arthur Conway (sportsman)

message: Should it be fast bowler or rather more than medium? If there is a citation for only one then maybe that should be the one that is used instead of the obituary being mentioned in parenthesis. Leefkrust22 (talk) 19:56, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speed
Talk:Worrell 1000

message: Should this still be flagged as part of Wikiproject Rowing?  It looks like it is a sailing race and not a rowing race?  Boatman 12:21, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Changed to WikiProject Virginia. utcursch | talk 05:53, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

message: As a start a simple chart of the years the race was run, the number of competitors and winners would be a great start. 
Also, two of the three remaining links are dead.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZeroXero (talk • contribs) 22:04, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs Lots of Work 

message: I have updated this to include the changes I suggested, including adding a new table which makes understanding the history of the race at a glance possible. 
I had two changes reverted:  one was simply removing the note about the founder dying.  I don't think this is really OT for the article, and if it is maybe should be under the history section in general .  
For the time being I've left it as reverted. 
The other change was to rename the Winners category to "Race Strategy".    The winners category is *not* about the winners.  It explicitly says "here is some stuff from people who competed".   It does not list the winners, nor is the advice from a team that won. 
So, I have reverted this to the more descriptive and factually correct heading.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZeroXero (talk • contribs) 00:19, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updated Page
Talk:Time Space Visualiser

message: There are numerous reasons why this wikipedia entry is valid and should not be deleted. The subject matter (TSV) is of interest and is important because:
- The publisher, NZDWFC, is the longest running Doctor Who fan club in New Zealand.
- TSV is the longest running Doctor Who fanzine in New Zealand and one of a few print fanzines about Doctor Who still published internationally.
- DWM comic strip writer/editor Warwick 'Scott' Gray and novelist and Big Finish writer David Bishop were both early members of the NZDWFC and had their first Doctor Who work published in TSV.
- Material first published in TSV has been reprinted in books and magazines, including The Discontinuity Guide, The Television Companion, Talkback, Doctor Who Magazine, In-Vision and Licensed Denied.
- TSV was the first publication to publish an interview with Sylvester McCoy era script editor Andrew Cartmel about his work on the series. The interview was subsequently picked up and reprinted in Doctor Who Magazine.
The above indicate that TSV is a well-established international Doctor Who publication with an excellent reputation. As such, it is an important part of the Doctor Who community and, within the New Zealand science fiction fandom, is important historically.
The intention is for the TSV wikipedia entry to be fully expanded to indicate this important and to provide a fuller history and background to the publication. As TSV is still in print, the wikipedia pages will be kept up to date.
Z3n 15:14, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'm afraid it also constitutes fancruft in that it is an unofficial fanzine; while it is of interest to fans, it has little relevance to the encyclopedic coverage of a television series. --The Missing Hour 20:38, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes well, let's send it to AfD then. Unless you can provide links to newspaper or magazine articles etc. about the entity if will likely be deleted though. Herostratus 23:58, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Domo (robot)

message: Recently, someone added the comment, "Domo is also a slang term. Domo is used by us just as smurf is used by The Smurfs." I have never heard this, and, honestly, it sounds like some vandal's nonsense. Right now, I've got it hidden as a  comment. If itis a regional term and can be explained and verified, then it might be worth including. Otherwise, I'm removing it altogether.--Autumn Forrester 15:16, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Smurf slang term 
Talk:Arthur Fielder

message: So, I've been through and added references and so on. In the process I had to remove quite a lot of information that I simply could find referenced in any way - particularly about his later career, for example seasons in which he was injured or didn't play well. I'm sure that much of that was valid -and it may only take me getting hold if a couple of books to be able to add it again. If anyone has any decent sources on this then I think that would really help matters. Thanks Blue Square Thing (talk) 13:53, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updated February 2016
Talk:Eurobond (external bond)

message: Wikipedia has now two completely different articles with very similar names. 1) Eurobonds (suggested European bonds), and 2) "Eurobond (Eurobonds in the meaning of international bonds denominated in a different currency). I suggest to change the name of this article "Eurobond" to something more specific to minimize confusion. Any ideas? --spitzl (talk) 12:44, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  changing name 

message: Google UK #1 result for Eurobond is http://www.eurobond.co.uk/, a manufacturer of building materials. John a s (talk) 01:19, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eurobond Laminates 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
Moved. See disagreement below in regard to PTOPIC, and yet there is general agreement that the present titling needs to be improved. The first title is moved to Eurobond (international) and the second to Eurobond (eurozone). The basename will occupy a disambiguation page. In line with closing instructions, since "there is no consensus for the (qualifiers) actually chosen, if editors object to the closer's choices, they may make another move request immediately, hopefully to their final resting places". Kudos to editors for your input, and Happy Publishing! (nac by page mover) Paine Ellsworth, ed. put'r there  15:57, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
===Post-move===
Please see also User talk:Paine Ellsworth#Regarding your Eurobond / Eurobonds page moves for explanation in regard to why Eurobond (international) was redabbed to Eurobond (external bond). Paine Ellsworth, ed. put'r there  15:54, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 22 May 2019 

message: Please see also User talk:Paine Ellsworth#Regarding your Eurobond / Eurobonds page moves for explanation in regard to why Eurobond (international) was redabbed to Eurobond (external bond). Paine Ellsworth, ed. put'r there  15:54, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Post-move
Talk:Calendar (New Style) Act 1750

message: The article currently says that "So that the calendar in Ireland would remain harmonised with that of Great Britain, the Parliament of Ireland passed similarly worded legislation as the "Calendar (New Style) Act, 1750" ". However, the source which it cites has the Great Britain chapter number - XXIII. There is no reference to such an Act in List_of_Acts_of_the_Parliament_of_Ireland,_1701-1800#23_Geo._2_(1749), in List_of_Acts_of_the_Parliament_of_Ireland,_1701-1800#25_Geo._2_(1751) or indeed in the original staute-book. And see the Irish Short Titles Act 1962 "1781–82 - 21 & 22 Geo. 3: c. 48. - Calendar (New Style) Act, 1750, and Calendar Act, 1751, extended to Ireland, [S. 3 (in pt.)] - Calender Act, 1781." The original of that Act starts here and section 3 is here - "all such statutes made in England or Great Britain, as concern the stile or calendar ... shall be accepted, used and executed in this kingdom, according to the present tenor of the same respectively". I suggest that the article should be amended accordingly. Alekksandr (talk) 23:45, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I see from Talk:History of Ireland (1691–1800)#Old Style and New Style dating that a wp:RS researched this issue and says (with an example from Dublin) that the change was accepted at least de facto. The paper suggests that the 1781 Act was more about the Dublin Parliament asserting its rights than to shut a possible legal loop-hole but it is expressed rather off-handedly so I don't think we can use it to support either possibility. We will just have to state the facts and let the reader decide. ----John Maynard Friedman (talk) 13:11, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Ireland

message: If the article achieves GA, it will become eligible to have an item in DYK if it is good enough. So I'm inviting suggestions here, please. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 20:37, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Did you know" candidates 

message: # despite frequent repetition of this assertion, there is no evidence that anyone rioted when eleven days were deleted from the calendar for 1752 --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 20:37, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Did you know that...
Template talk:Country data Japan

message: * There is never that a Japanese national flag became the Kyokujitsuki (旭日旗). At first the person whom I want to display please give the source. If there is a person expecting display without the source being posted, I must think about a request of protection. Please try to refer to Flag of Japan page. If it is replaced a national flag secretly by a flag of the armed forces, even people of any country will feel it unpleasantly. --saburny 15:25, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Look at this: :Image:Chitose_light_carrier_configuration.jpg What kind of flag do you see ?!?  Or here: :Image:Chitose1.jpg ? --Denniss 19:20, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japanese flag 

message: As is discussed (quite confusingly) above,  - the Kyokujitsuki - is Japan's historical and current Naval Ensign. As such, the labeling "" is IMO incorrect. I suggest "" or similar instead. --Himasaram 00:55, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Himasaram, migration was not complete and your careless edit made dozens of WP:AIR related articles broken. I'll fix all of them but next time try to be more careful. Regards, Piotr Mikołajski 11:04, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Huh? Where exactly? I just looked through all the articles in List of aircraft of the Japanese Navy but couldn't spot anything "broken" there. --Himasaram 11:35, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably not all aircraft are listed in List of aircraft of the Japanese Navy article. Yesterday someone edited Tachikawa Ki-55, today I've found Aichi E16A or Nakajima E8N to name that three. I have no idea how many were changed after 22 July by other editors and how many were not found yet. Piotr Mikołajski 14:27, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hm, I googled for "flag alias-ww2" and got another two (except talk pages) - Lavochkin-Gorbunov-Goudkov LaGG-3 & Douglas DC-5. I think it should be all right now. --Himasaram 00:25, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems that those two were the last ones because yesterday some people cleared such entries. Piotr Mikołajski 10:31, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japan's Naval Ensign 

message: The image :File:Flag of Japan.svg can be used for the 1999 to current flag; there is no official Pantone for the Japanese flag and there has been no specific shades except for the government issued flags (which the main Flag of Japan.svg can be used for). The CIA drawn flags do not have the correct ratios for the flag (WFB 2013) and the sun ratio is not correct on all three WFB flags (sun needs to be 3/5th of the hoist, all three are too large). User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 09:22, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Done I think in that case those variants can just be removed from the template. If any articles are using them, they will now use the default. Is that correct?  — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 07:20, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes it does. Thank you very much! User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 08:38, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template image cleanup
Talk:Royal Army Chaplains' Department

message: Two cap badges for the Royal Army Chaplains Dept. is not unique. The Royal Australian Army Chaplains Dept. has two cap badges, Christian and jewish. These badges are almost identical to the British Army's. Ozdaren 15:28, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The item in question actually reads "uniquely within the British Army". -- Necrothesp 16:05, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Two Cap Badges

message: Are these the only denominations and religions because they are the only ones whch candidates have came from?  Or does army only accept chaplins from these?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.40.4.248 (talk) 00:29, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Denominations 

message: I have suggested moving the list of Chaplains-General from the Chaplain-General article into this article. The other British chaplaincy units have the list of heads within that article. I see no reason for there to be, in effect, a separate article listing the British Army's Chaplains-General. That page can then become a general article about the heads of chaplaincy units rather than a British/Anglican specific article. Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk  08:42, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Support. The article on Chaplain-General should be more general. Dormskirk (talk) 10:30, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

text: Now moved as there were no objections. Dormskirk (talk) 13:40, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of Chaplains-General 
Talk:It Gets the Worst at Night

message: Plot summary is now 100% self written. No content was copied from websites. Russell29 15:29, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot

message: The individual episode articles for One Tree Hill (TV series) are now being reviewed according to episode notability guidelines.  Please contribute to the discussion on Talk:List of One Tree Hill episodes#Episode article review. Thanks. -- Jack Merridew 10:34, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notice of One Tree Hill episode article review
Talk:Oxford Down

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://afs.okstate.edu/breeds/sheep/oxford/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:08, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Prince Kachō Hiroatsu

message: In accordance with the post-war spelling reform, there is no longer any "kwa" sound in Japanese; for simplicity and consistency's sake, this should be renamed. See also Prince Kwacho Hirotsune. LordAmeth 09:02, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with this move. It will make things more consistent. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 19:22, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:Honeywell 200

message: It's been over 30 years since I've worked on a 200 series computer, so some of this may be foggy.
Address mode 2 had no index registers, the entire 12 bits was the operand address giving a 4,096 character address range. 
Address mode 3 had a 15 bit address allowing 32,768 bytes to be addressed. The remaining high order 3 bits were the address modifiers. 0 meant no modification and 1-6 meant the address was offset by index registers 1 to 6. Modifier value 7 meant the address was an indirect address, in other words it was the address of a 3 character location in memory which contained the actual address of the operand.
Address mode 4 (this is fuzzy). The address portion was 18 bits and the remaining bits indicated one of 2 sets of 16 index registers or an indirect address.
Change Sequence Mode swapped the instruction register contents with the address contained in the Change Sequence register. This was usually used with instruction trapping mode which caused a sequence swap when an instruction with an item-marked op-code was encountered. Was there an actual CSM instruction, or was trapping the only way to do this?
The system also had a basic interrupt structure and supported basic multi-programming operation.
151.204.233.138 15:37, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does anybody have the Programmer's Reference Guide
Talk:Arthur Jones (English cricketer)

message: Arthur Jones was also a Midlands Cup winning captain of Leicester Tigers and played 224 games for the club, should the page be moved to Arthur Jones (sportsman) to reflect his notability in both sports?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skeene88 (talk • contribs) 15:24, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed move to Arthur Jones (sportsman)
Talk:Watershed management

message: http://www.bcwatersheds.org/issues/water/bcgwlp/b1.shtml
--TechHouse 15:48, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Page in Question 

message: I would greatly appreciate any constructive criticism or suggestions about my work.  I am trying to improve myself as a communicator and I feel that it is important for me to find out what the community thinks about my strengths and weaknesses.  Feel free to post on this talk page or send me a message.
Thanks,
Prevero
=== Feedback ===
Prevero: Prompted by your request on my talkpage, I took a quick look at the article. I have some concerns about the topic, or perhaps, better said, the way the topic is approached. I'm concerned this article might be a non-nuetral Wikipedia:Content forking of Drainage basin. If it was titled, and talked more about as, Watershed management on the whole, I wouldn't be so concerned - that would be a great article of which this article should be a part (a subsection). Here you have given information about watersheds in general, pollution and pollution migration by water, and who governs environmental control. The way the article currently reads, it lacks a continuous thread relating to watershed protection.
Consider for a minute the topic of watershed management. A watershed management artcle might include: agencies governing watershed use, watershed planning, watershed monitoring, watershed protection... Think about it...
And if you want more feedback, take a look at Wikipedia:Requests for comment. ZueJay (talk) 23:35, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits and Critiques 

message: Prevero: Prompted by your request on my talkpage, I took a quick look at the article. I have some concerns about the topic, or perhaps, better said, the way the topic is approached. I'm concerned this article might be a non-nuetral Wikipedia:Content forking of Drainage basin. If it was titled, and talked more about as, Watershed management on the whole, I wouldn't be so concerned - that would be a great article of which this article should be a part (a subsection). Here you have given information about watersheds in general, pollution and pollution migration by water, and who governs environmental control. The way the article currently reads, it lacks a continuous thread relating to watershed protection.
Consider for a minute the topic of watershed management. A watershed management artcle might include: agencies governing watershed use, watershed planning, watershed monitoring, watershed protection... Think about it...
And if you want more feedback, take a look at Wikipedia:Requests for comment. ZueJay (talk) 23:35, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Feedback
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/CATALOG

message: The CATALOG article is extremely informative. It provides useful information about library training schemes. Many people are woefully ignorant of the fact that a person must take a degree to become a librarian. This page gives information about the Cambridge library traineeships and provides links to SCONUL, CILIP and the University of Cambridge. These useful links to professional bodies are invaluable.
This article does not 'belong in more than one category.'
If this article is deleted, it will truly be a terrible shame for potential librarians everywhere. As the managers of information and the people at the forefront of Web 2.0, this seems to me to be a bit of a paradox. Mrsradcliffe23 15:48, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Old Crow

message: The article lists Turnpike Troubadours as the originators of the song "Doreen" in 2015, but the Old 97's have an earlier version of the same song. I do not know, nor care to look it up (as I am drunk on Old Crow at the moment), if the Old 97's are the originators of "Doreen", but it is surely not the Turnpike Troubadours.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.186.135.227 (talk) 12:11, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Popular Culture - music 

message: I removed most of what was obvious vandalism, but there might be more. Pgrote 15:50, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: The old crow warehouse with 40k barrels burned to the ground on July 3rd 2019. The fire was reported by many new outlets as a Jim Bean warehouse.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.255.65.121 (talk) 18:08, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  2019 Fire at Warehouse 

message: Thanks to all of you editors for keeping things clean by removing trivia that keeps being added on a regular basis. Drmies (talk) 00:28, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Popular culture 

message: I'm not very knowledgeable about whiskey, but there is no mention here regarding the fact that Old Crow was at one point a Rye Whiskey.  It may be noteworthy.--Rockfang (talk) 13:24, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rye vs. bourbon 

message: In the short novel Sweet Thursday by John Steinbeck, a bar matron is seen pouring rot gut whiskey into an Old Crow bottle so the patrons believe they are getting good whiskey. 
Also, Old Crow is drunk in Hunter S. Thompson's The Rum Diaries.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:F:600:F9EA:8CBE:F132:1A2A:3E40 (talk) 03:05, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Steinbeck, Thompson, and Old Crow