lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Der Schneemann

message: Well I've done the best I can. I've updated the synopsis and the intro. I've changed and removed the bits that have simply been lifted from Google Video. I doubt you will ever be able to get a decent, worthy picture for this article though. I could take a screenshot of the one on Google Video but I don't have a clue about the copyright issues etc. Any ideas? SIGURD42 12:35, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the much-improved synopsis, it will make the film much easier to appreciate for the next person who happens to wander in here.  I won't "sort out" your English because I don't think it requires any, it's very good.  I did rearrange this page to get the newest items at the bottom.  As to copyright, I found some past discussion of German (and perhaps EU?) copyrights here, but I don't know what it means in this case.  Best regards, CliffC 13:37, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well thanks for the comment! After looking at other articles and the way they use screenshots I'm fairly sure I can use one here so I'll upload that soon. SIGURD42 21:27, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

text: Done and done :) Hope everythings OK with that. SIGURD42 22:00, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Updates
Talk:Mara

message: * The reason I added the tag was because of the numbered lists.  These are to be bulletted.
* Now that I look closer I see a lot of bold that also needs to be removed.
* The people sub-headings are unnecessary.
* There appears to be a lot of extra text.
* There's a link in a heading.  That's a no-no.
Hope this helps.  I'll fix it up myself eventually, if no one gets to it first. Tedernst | talk 21:16, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have replaced the numbers with bullets and fixed the link in the heading - must have missed earlier.  The bolding is not great but doesn't worry me, similarly the extra text.  No strong objections if it is removed though--A  Y  Arktos 23:08, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I would suggest that big block of text about the gangs be moved to Mara (gangs) or some similar name.  It doesn't belong on this page, but seems to be valuble information, if it's verifiable. Tedernst | talk 16:44, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  cleanup tag 

message: Does this article need a cleanup? It's getting quite long but all the items seem relevant. Ideas? peterl (talk) 00:58, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: Here in Latin America (at least in Central america), "mara" refers to all criminal street gangs, at least the ones in the style of MS-13. I don't know if the word ultimately carries connotations beyond just "gang" (Maras_(gangs) exists but is a stub), but one should look up if the distinction is important enough to have a link to that rather than just one of the "maras". 201.190.31.4 (talk) 03:22, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I've updated the link, and also moved the new target page. Mindmatrix 13:00, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maybe not relevant, but a clarification 
Talk:Cthulhu

message: Cthulhu is referred to in D&D as a 'Great Old One', and a Warlock can make a pact with them. Qwerfjkl talk 10:24, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cthulhu reference 

message: While the information is accurate within the mention of Terraria under "Legacy", the source is Fandom which is against Wikipedia policy as it is user-generated content. Unless there is a reliable source proving it, it'll probably have to be removed. Icedmorning (talk) 22:49, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terraria 

message: The cthulhu also have a roblox group after it named the Lovecraftian Order, they have one game the Sunken City of Rhy'leh  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:240:D600:45F0:C014:6A31:68DC:57E (talk) 14:48, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cthulu 

message: This article says that Cthulhu was taken out of "all future editions," but in the current 5e version "Great Cthulhu" is mentioned as an entity appropriate to the Great Old One patron of the warlock class. Is this worth mentioning? Abelhawk (talk) 14:05, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dungeons & Dragons mentions 

message: Khlûl′-hloo - the hl might represent a "glottal lateral sound".
My theory is consistent with Lovecraft's description of the sound being "guttural" and "impossible for humans to pronounce". I think the correct pronunciation is [ˈqLu̞Lʔ.Lu], with the L representing a voiced emphatic half-labialized glottal lateral approximant. I am a Green Bee (talk) 11:42, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Why are you posting this WP:OR here? Veverve (talk) 17:16, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Glottal Lateral 

message: There are over 150 ranked board games on boardgamegeek using the Cthulhu Mythos, some very highly ranked, and new ones keep coming out. 85.65.187.42 (talk) 19:23, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Influence on board games
Talk:Swim bladder

message: It should be noted that there is a difference between gas bladders and swim bladders, gas bladders are a more primitive stage, which actually allows some fish (Karp) to breath air, the swim bladder is primarily marine, and can't be used to breath air directly.
Siraf 23:13, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gas Bladder vs. Swim Bladder 

message: Link [5] is not valid any more.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.5.27.66 (talk) 09:59, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken links 

message: Darwin has a wonderful discussion in the Origin of the swim bladder:
The illustration of the swim bladder in fishes is a good one, because it shows us clearly the highly important fact that an organ originally constructed for one purpose, namely, flotation, may be converted into one for a widely different purpose, namely, respiration. The swim bladder has, also, been worked in as an accessory to the auditory organs of certain fishes. All physiologists admit that the swimbladder is homologous, or “ideally similar” in position and structure with the lungs of the higher vertebrate animals: hence there is no reason to doubt that the swim bladder has actually been converted into lungs, or an organ used exclusively for respiration.
According to this view it may be inferred that all vertebrate animals with true lungs are descended by ordinary generation from an ancient and unknown prototype, which was furnished with a floating apparatus or swim bladder.
Worth mentioning? --Gargletheape (talk) 01:53, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Definitely, though IMHO we shouldn't include the full quote, especially since modern research (cited on the page) suggests lungs are the ancestral state.  I saw something on some page (sorry, I forget which once) where the quote was in the footnote.  Can we do something like that? Mokele (talk) 02:51, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm a bit reluctant to edit the article myself - don't know much biology...didn't know what a swim-bladder was, in fact, which is how I ended up here. Just thought it was kind of cool Darwin was using them as evidence for such theoretically important ideas. --Gargletheape (talk) 03:09, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I put it in.  By the way, you don't know what page number and edition the quote is from, do you? Mokele (talk) 03:56, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

text: I pasted from the 6th edition. Don't really have a page number...it's a Gutenberg text. --Gargletheape (talk) 16:02, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Darwin
Talk:Quaternions and spatial rotation

message: The paragraph argued that usage of the Shuster convention is discouraged, as did the cited article "Why and How to Avoid the Flipped Quaternion Multiplication" by Sommer et. al. But the formulas in the paragraph are not clearly distinguished (except by red minus signs). These formulae are beginning to show up on Google Images out of context, creating a lot of confusion to students. I tried to add labelling "\qquad \text{alternative Convention, usage discouraged} to the right of the formulas but the edit got reverted by a anti-vandalism bot. If anyone (especially registered users) agree, please help with the edit.184.147.40.19 (talk) 04:04, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I already reversed the bot edit a few minutes ago.  I'll just nod and pretend I knew for sure it wasn't vandalism. Cheers.   signed, Willondon (talk)  04:14, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Labelling the formulas in the Alternative Convention section 

message: Since quaternions are rotations about arbitrary axis, it makes sense as a matter of convention that the angle is always a non-negative number. Moreover, the angle must always be in the 1st and 2nd quadrant as all other quadrants have equivalent negative angles. If for example we want to represent a rotation of -\frac{\pi}{6} about the \bigl( \begin{smallmatrix} 1 \\ 0 \\ 0 \end{smallmatrix} \bigr) axis, this is entirely equivalent to a rotation of \frac{\pi}{6} about the \bigl( \begin{smallmatrix} -1 \\ 0 \\ 0 \end{smallmatrix} \bigr) axis.
So indeed the formula to recover the rotation angle presented \theta = 2\, {\rm arctan2} \left(\sqrt{x^2+y^2+z^2},\,w\right) will indeed produce the correct answer, in the 1st and 2nd quadrants because thee first argument is always going to be positive, but it is un-necessarily complicated. I propose to recover the angle we simply use
\theta =2\, \arccos \left(w \right)
which also produces results in the 1st and 2nd quadrants, Once the angle is recovered, then the axis is simply the vector part divided by the sine of the half angle
\vec{\rm z} = \tfrac{1}{\sin \left( \frac{\theta}{2} \right) }\,\vec{v}
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jalexiou (talk • contribs) 16:26, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recover Axis Angle 

message: :
Shouldn't that be the other way around? That is, one rotation has two representations – not that one matrix can represent two rotations. —Tamfang (talk) 05:41, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  rotations and matrices
Talk:Earth science

message: I believe there should be an image that shows all of the layers of Earth,lithosphere, asthenosphere, etc., especially since each layer was explicitly mentioned in detail. It would be nice to have an illustration to go along with it.
Zoe Roros— Zoeroros (talk) 23:33, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Different Pictures Needed 

message: Several sections focus on the subject itself rather than the scientific study of the subject. This content needs to be rewritten or replaced by information about the study under the scope of Earth science. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 04:04, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Off topic
Talk:ABBA

message: The redirect ᗅᗺᗷᗅ has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  LOOKSQUARE (👤️·🗨️) talk 01:17, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:ᗅᗺᗷᗅ]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: Their name is usually written with the left B backwards Wolf O'Donnel (talk) 01:11, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: I am afraid that it is not true that SOS was Abba's first number one in France. This song was not the most successful Abba song in that country, I do I do was more successful in France and sold 300 000 copies (you can check that on Infodisc or Top France). In fact, the best selling singles for Abba in France were : Fernando, Money Money Money, Gimme Gimme Gimme, they were awarded a gold disc. Svenjonal (talk) 15:52, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abba number one in France 

message: There's a minor edit war going on concerning whether Abba are still active or whether they ceased to be active in 2022. Do we need to reach a consensus on this? Mark and inwardly digest (talk) 13:21, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed here, as the tussle on this matter is becoming somewhat annoying. This needs to be pinned down. I don't know enough about the matter to have a hard position at this point, though. Stefen Towers among the rest! Gab • Gruntwerk 17:27, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The years active is ridiculous. To say they've been active since 2016 suggests they have had the same activity for the past 8 years as 1974-82. When they recorded the songs for their recent album is irrelevant. They became publicly active in 2021. They were active 1972-82, 2021. Their current 'live' show is not activity ongoing.Tuzapicabit (talk) 22:29, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Cites for these claims would be useful for the discussion. Stefen Towers among the rest! Gab • Gruntwerk 22:42, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Active or not?
Talk:White

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage.) Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.deseret.com/2018/12/2/20794441/5-special-occasions-when-you-should-wear-white, https://historyofyesterday.com/a-brief-history-of-the-white-wedding-dress-80ac81b1a113, https://theconversation.com/why-do-brides-wear-white-144395, https://symbolsage.com/white-wedding-gown-dress/, etc.. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  DanCherek (talk) 05:58, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: White is not a colour. This article shouldn’t call it a colour. NO ARTICLE should call it a colour. こもれびーさんLeave me a message! 03:22, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. RealAspects (talk) 07:37, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 26 December 2022 

message: The redirect Wite has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Steel1943 (talk) 18:54, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Wite]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Japanese proverbs

message: explain to me the proverb-phone connection?--69.212.100.126 07:01, 11 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Could someone 

message: Can anyone tell me what is the correct Japanese translation of the proverb "Who travels for love finds a thousand miles not longer than one."? From what I've researched, it appears to be a Japanese love proverb but I can't seem to find its original translation. 84.90.96.252 (talk) 11:54, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably this: 惚れて通えば千里も一里 Horete kayoeba senri mo ichiri. --Kusunose 14:11, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the translation, Kusunose. =D 84.90.96.252 (talk) 18:22, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japanese translation 

message: This is used to define one of the proverbs, but I've never heard this one, and neither can I figure it out nor find its meaning by searching. I'm hoping to confirm that the original Japanese proverb means what I think it does: "Anybody who decides to be publicly different will be punished and brought into line." Can anyone verify that?--Atkinson (talk) 19:55, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does, "A tall tree catches much wind," mean? 

message: "If you sit by the river long enough, you will see the body of your enemy float by"? 150.203.177.97 (talk) 00:18, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sit by the river 

message: Could this 七転び八起き (Nanakorobi yaoki) "Fall seven times and stand up eight" have been originating from the bible?
Proverbs 24:16 (BBE) "For an upright man, after falling seven times, will get up again: but trouble is the downfall of the evil."
The biblical numbers are too conspicuous to be a coincidence. Normally one would think of three or four as a number to be used. Mightyname (talk) 22:42, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin
Talk:Dynamics

message: I suggest add a definition of dynamic web page
Okay, when it was called Forte, the definition at the bottom (manufacturer of photographic materials) was okay. Now it's been changed, it's broken! --Bbtommy.
:This page was never called "forte". However, forte was once a redirect to here. It isn't any longer. I'll move the info at the bottom to forte (I'm assuming this is what you mean - if not you'll have to fix it). --Camembert
:Okay, cheers! --Bbtommy
What is DYNAMIC+? - -Oniony 12:27, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: ... 204.18.46.150 (talk) 16:02, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
Talk:Continuous revelation

message: The words "continuous" and "continuing" are not synonymous.  The leaders of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints have repeatedly made it clear that the doctines of their faith teach continuing revelation, and not continuous revelation.  Therefore this article has been incorrectly titled, or at least this sub section has been incorrectly placed under it. Original comment by User:The fiddler, moved from article.
:See here for a conference talk by General Authority James E. Faust on the use of the term "continuous revelation." Tijuana Brass 17:23, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of "continuous" and "continuing" in LDS terminology 

message: Bahá'í don't belong to here. Their revelation system is progressive, not continuous. LDS have a prophetic institution that, according to their system, is entitled to continuous or continuing revelation (which is not distinguishable in my language), i.e. updating, improving and rewriting the system simply because they're prophets. Bahá'í don't have this in their system. They have one last prophet for this millenium, and that's Bahá'u'lláh, STOP. Nobody have the right to update and make prophesies (according to their view) for at least 1000 years into the future. Bahá'í is very well written about in the article of Progressive revelation (Bahá'í) so it need not a section in this article too — a link to there will be enough. Rursus dixit. (mbork3!) 20:29, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Bahá'í not here!

message: The lead part describes continuous revelation as God's revealing of divine principles to humanity, which cannot be true in case of Buddhism (terma is not described in the article) and Taoism. --178.66.40.75 (talk) 08:05, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Atheist religions 

message: The Judaism segment is woefully underfilled. I am not Jewish myself, but I imagine there's more to say about Progressive/Reform Judaism and continuous revelation than Conservative Judaism :P  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.85.237.44 (talk) 22:34, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Judaism
Talk:Centipede

message: Two months ago, realized that Pleurostigmomorpha (Pleurostigmophora?), which I created, was little more than an unhelpful stub providing primarily the morphological differences between the two subclasses (to wit, Pleurostigmomorpha and Notostigmomorpha, the latter of which comprises exclusively the Scutigeromorpha). I moved this content into Centipede#Internal phylogeny.  reverted this edit, saying . I disagree. The merger discussion regarded content regarding the orders, this is the morphological differences between the two subclasses. Regardless, this content needs to be kept somewhere. I see three potential options:
*Move it to Orders of centipedes
*Move it to Centipede#Internal phylogeny
*Keep it at Pleurostigmomorpha (currently a redirect)
For reference, here is the orphaned information (currently kept nowhere except in page history):
Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 14:44, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, my mistake. Put it in Centipede. Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:17, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  What to do with Pleurostigmomorpha
Talk:Sextus Varius Marcellus

message: I tried to put this into complete sentences, and failed miserably.  Who is this guy?  Why is he important?  Who cares about him? Tuf-Kat
:@Tuf-Kat this guy is the father of the Roman Emperor Elagabalus, how is he not important? WeWuzPhoenicians (talk) 01:05, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Kalwaria Zebrzydowska

message: I removed the following, and replaced it with a .
* 
This was causing an error because what is cited as an ISBN is not a valid ISBN, it is actually an International Standard Music Number. While the actual item itself would probably be a valid source for this (I assume the lyrics are attributed to the poem on the sheet music) the url given is not a source for that, it is merely a location where the music can be purchased. As such, it should not be linked to as a citation. Revent (talk) 01:36, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed citation