Talk:2006 transatlantic aircraft plot

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on 2006 transatlantic aircraft plot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081205123747/http://www.dawn.com:80/2006/09/01/top11.htm to http://www.dawn.com/2006/09/01/top11.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081208194823/http://www.rawstory.com:80/news/2006/Sources_August_Terror_Plot_Fiction_Underscoring_0918.html to http://www.rawstory.com/news/2006/Sources_August_Terror_Plot_Fiction_Underscoring_0918.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:05, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The  Timeline article is a good example of what I would call the WP 'breaking news syndrome', by which I mean it successfully covers everything which came out while the story was 'front page news', but not subsequent developments. 
Any meaningful timeline would start at least 6 months before the arrest, (the beginning of surveillance), and would involve subjects such as the arrest of Rauf in Pakistan, what prompted that arrest and what the consequences were to the UK operation. Also the three trials and sentencing, none of which are covered.
A considerable amount of detail in timeline is credited to unnamed sources, many US, (ie distant from the actual investigation) and much is 'early speculation'. Many details have since been discredited, or at least not substantiated, in court or elsewhere. There is general admission that in the initial response, there was a great deal of 'talking up' (number of planes, state of readiness, number of 'martyr tapes', etc.). Also, a great deal of detail has since emerged about, for example, the role of the US, (aided by Pakistan), in 'forcing the UK's hand' and about also about how UK initially became suspicious and concluded airlines were the probable targets (which they found difficult to prove in court, even though they were able to prove some kind of conspiracy). Whilst initial claims are part of the story, a timeline which fails to indicate which claims were later substantiated and which not, is not doing the reader a service.
I propose a merger with the present article, since info in the 'timeline' is either unreliable or duplicated with either this, or the security reaction article. Pincrete (talk) 12:44, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 20:43, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 2006 transatlantic aircraft plot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090327042820/http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/about-us/news/threat-severe to http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/about-us/news/threat-severe
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:52, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on 2006 transatlantic aircraft plot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5wg3NwDrg?url=http://today.reuters.co.uk/news/articlenews.aspx?type=topNews&storyID=2006-08-10T070221Z_01_L10215465_RTRUKOC_0_UK-SECURITY-BRITAIN.xml to http://today.reuters.co.uk/news/articlenews.aspx?type=topNews&storyID=2006-08-10T070221Z_01_L10215465_RTRUKOC_0_UK-SECURITY-BRITAIN.xml
*Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5wg3vG5yS?url=http://www.number-10.gov.uk/output/Page9970.asp to http://www.number-10.gov.uk/output/Page9970.asp
*Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5jiFxc4E0?url=http://www.tsa.gov/press/happenings/9-25_updated_passenger_guidance.shtm to http://www.tsa.gov/press/happenings/9-25_updated_passenger_guidance.shtm
*Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5whHx6CvS?url=http://scotlandonsunday.scotsman.com/index.cfm?id=1178302006 to http://scotlandonsunday.scotsman.com/index.cfm?id=1178302006
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:02, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified