lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Bryten Goss

message: Gosswriter is apparently Goss' mother (Gosswriter on Myspace). I have informed her of Wikipedia's policy, and that she should post requests for any desired changes to the article here on the talk page. Precious Roy (talk) 16:01, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That is advisable, but not mandatory. Tyrenius (talk) 08:12, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: We don't know that they are the same person, even though it seems likely. Tyrenius (talk) 11:02, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If it's not his mother, it's someone impersonating her (see her talk page for references to "my son" and "my daughter"). Precious Roy (talk) 13:19, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, misunderstanding - I thought you were using the MySpace page to verify the wiki user. I see it is mentioned just for additional info. Tyrenius (talk) 01:11, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Conflict of interest

message: As posted on User talk:Precious Roy:
:You've replaced the COI tag, which says discuss on the talk page, but you've not specified on the talk page what needs cleaning up or what is not NPOV.  You should do so, or else remove the tag. Thanks. 
Tyrenius (talk) 11:01, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The tag is to signify that someone with a conflict of interest has contributed to the page. It says the article may need clean-up, not "does". However, if you think my usage is incorrect, go ahead and remove it (you're an admin and can do what you want), I won't revert it. Precious Roy (talk) 13:16, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: COI tag
Talk:Heijunka

message: *http://membres.lycos.fr/hconline/lean/heijunka_us.htm - Good overview tutorial explaining heijunka
*http://www.emsstrategies.com/dm090804article.html - Definition and explanation of the process
These two sources of information appear to be published online by their authors. Wikipedia has a guideline on self-published sources -- in general, self-published sources shouldn't be used in articles unless the authors are established experts in the topic. 
I think these sources would be considered good sources:
* http://www.sme.org/cgi-bin/get-newsletter.pl?LEAN&20061010&3&
* http://www.sme.org/cgi-bin/find-articles.pl?&ME06ART49&ME&20060809&&SME&
--Busy Stubber 18:40, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: External links

message: See Production leveling. Jayen466 22:03, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?
Talk:History of Christianity in China

message: This article only links to Christianity in China. At this point, I would almost recommend merging the two because the Christianity in China article is mostly history already.Brian0324 18:44, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I suggest adding additional material from Christianity in China article. 
That is an article, which is too long and includes too much history.
How should this be done ?
Sarcelles 21:14, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Template talk:Viral systemic diseases

message: This template started out listing diseases only.  It now seems to becoming a mix of diseases, and the viruses involved.  (especially now that GrahamColm added viral gastroenteritis as a subhead.) Should we have a consensus whether this should be viral diseases (as the template name suggests), viruses, or both?  Do we care? Regards—G716 <T·C> 18:56, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Since there are several templates with similar issues, posted at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine#Disease navigation templates - emphasise disease vs. causative agent, please discuss there.  Thanks. Zodon (talk) 02:51, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Viral diseases, viruses, or both

message: This is supposed to be a diseases template (per name, title, category, etc.), but lately the emphasis seems to have shifted away from diseases to virology.  
I think we should move it back to dealing with diseases (i.e. disease first), group items by disease characteristics, and remove taxonomic information on the causative organism - template is becoming too large/complex.  
If want to keep the focus on viruses, then the name, title, category, color scheme, etc. should be changed to make it a virology template (e.g. Viruses that affect humans.)  
The same thing is also occurring with template:Zoonotic viral diseases, and it should probably be treated similarly. Zodon (talk) 00:59, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Since there are several templates with similar issues, posted at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine#Disease navigation templates - emphasise disease vs. causative agent, please discuss there.  Thanks. Zodon (talk) 02:51, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diseases template 

message: propose name change.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.151.229.24 (talk) 01:29, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  should it say viral diseases in humans?
Talk:Mr Bleaney

message: I deleted this para:
The poem and its eponymous character have stuck in the popular imagination. Ian Hamilton recited the poem to a friend after moving into a new flat, and the adjective Bleaneyish has entered the language.
''
First, an advanced Google search does not bear out "Bleanyish" as having entered the language. Secondly the Ian Hamilton bit requires a citation and is in any case not supportive of the contention of the first sentence of the deleted paragraph. asnac (talk) 08:19, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Para about 'popular imagination' deleted 

message: I tracked down the Clive James quotation mentioned but it doesn't refer to Mr Bleaney. So applying it here is a statement of opinion amounting to WP:OR. asnac (talk) 09:48, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clive James
Talk:Label (computer science)

message: I noticed this article does not cite any references or sources. According to Wikipedia policy, all articles should be verifiable. What is the reason the tag stating thins was removed? Martijn Hoekstra 19:14, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Following the linked articles provides most of the verification for what has been said.  Nothing substantial has been claimed that needs verification. Derek farn 23:16, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In principle, Wikipedia articles don't coun't as reliable sources (as anyone can edit them). The first line with the definition seems fine though. On the other hand, "In most languages labels take the form of an identifier, often followed by a punctuation character (e.g., a colon). Some languages (e.g., Fortran, BASIC) support numeric labels." is an unreferenced statement, and neither the Fortran, nor the BASIC article mention labels. Even if they did, we could easily take over the sourcing from that article, but they still would need to be copied. Thing is that I just don't quite understand is why you think it's "Completely over the top tagging", when the tag is nothing more than a reminder that there are no references in the article, and that adding them is a good idea (which I believe it is). Completely unrelated though, how would you feel about merging 'label' with 'goto', as they are so closely connected? Martijn Hoekstra 00:38, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

text: What you say is true.  However, adding this tag to such a small article is stating the obvious and being a bit pedantic.  This tag could probably be added to most of the short Wikipedia articles. Derek farn 17:34, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: And in my oppinion all unreferenced articles should have unreferenced tags. I saw another option recently, adding a References section, and placing the tag there. But to come back on my other point, what do you think about a merge?Martijn Hoekstra 22:12, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unreferenced

message: The parenthetical seems confusing. They say "Python (programming language)" for the Python programming language and "Go (programming language)" for the Go programming language. Here, since this article for labels has the same parenthetical "Label (programming language)", it looks like "Label" is a programming language in itself. How about taking the "language" part out, and just calling the article "Label (programming)"? Wuffyz 14:26, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I just moved it. - Wuffyz 19:29, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Parenthetical
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/TehBrandon

message: Category:1
Help:1
Mainspace310
Talk:7
Template:2
User talk:166
User:61
Wikipedia:22
avg edits per page 1.24
earliest23:12, 26 August 2006
number of unique pages460
total570
* The edit count was retrieved from this link at 19:15, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit count for TehBrandon
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Sadi Carnot/Workshop

message: I request that all parties chilax and stop recommending sanctions against each other.  Maybe even strike out past requests.  The matter in dispute is a disagreement in good faith between administrators.  Let's try to clarify the issues and provide guidance for future incidents.  
As for Sadi Carnot, Physchim62 and I have already agreed how to resolve that (mentorship/probation/topic ban or something like that).  At most, we just need Arbcom to confirm that his editing needs to be monitored and carefully inspected if he is going to return.- Jehochman  Talk 19:19, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Issues involving Kww and Hkhenson should be left for the community to handle.  Let's focus on the real issues instead of going off on tangents. - Jehochman  Talk 19:20, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I strongly endorse Jehochoman's general points above. I do disagree with ignoring the evidence that Hkhenson, who is in part an instigator of this fracas is similarly as guilty as Sadi Carnot who is on the receiving end of this of POV pushing and misrepresentation of sources as well as self-promotion. This is especially important since the remaining issues revolve around over reaction and undue favoritism on both sides. I think both Hkhenson and Sadi Carnot have been quite successful in gaining the undue confidence of administrators and other editors, at times including myself. I understand better why there was such as major disconnect between Jehochman and P62 when I see that Sadi was a prolific and very good editor in many namespaces and that Hkhenson has built an image of authority based on legitimate looking publications.--Nick Y. 19:52, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sadi's editing has been thoroughly investigated by the community.  Hkhenson and Kww have not received similar review.  If there are further problems from either editor, I suggest running them through our normal dispute resolution or incident handling process.  Should those processes fail to resolve the situation, they can be taken up as separate ArbCom cases.  I think if we tackle too many issues here, this case will get bogged down.  I am keenly aware of this possibility because the last case I participated in, COFS, dragged on for almost six months.  I don't think it would be fair to the parties for that to happen again.  - Jehochman  Talk 19:57, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

text: Well I think I have completed my proposals for the workshop if that helps to add clarity. I still have to reply to some of the allegations made against me, but I think that all parties can pretty much guess what I'm going to say ;) In case anyone hasn't noticed, the case has moved to the "Proposed decision" stage in any case. Physchim62 (talk) 13:17, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have struck the one that was probably most disagreeable to you. - Jehochman  Talk 14:21, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Chilax
Talk:Robert Cushman Murphy Junior High School

message: I think that the information on building size and capacity is irrelevant and should be removed. if nobody protests I'll remove it on 11/9/07 (Friday) Compwhizii 19:22, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Information Deleted Compwhiz II 00:36, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Building info

message: I think the article needs to mention Gelinas ALOT less! Compwhizii 19:26, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gelinas
Talk:Dado Villa-Lobos

message: Subject is a member of a notable band, and therefore meets WP:MUSIC. Will improve article to demonstrate such. -Hit bull, win steak(Moo!) 19:23, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Willo Davis Roberts

message: they need to put more info of her  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.227.107.121 (talk • contribs) 19:25, 7 November 2007
::Who is "they?"  Find some more info, and add it!   --Buzz 02:06, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Was Willo Davis Roberts racist against African-American people?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.166.181.69 (talk) 07:02, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Are there any sources that suggest this?   --Buzz 02:06, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Racist? 

message: I think we can remove the Wikify notice from this article now. The article has more cites, links and the language has been trimmed up. (Doctorfun (talk) 19:19, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing Wikify Notice 
Talk:Symphony No. 3 (Elgar/Payne)

message: Our article on Beethoven's 10th Symphony is called Symphony No. 10 (Beethoven/Cooper).  That recognises it's not purely a work by Beethoven, but is Barry Cooper's idea of what Beethoven might have written had he lived.
Similarly, shouldn't this article be called Symphony No. 3 (Elgar/Payne)?  
From the lede: ... officially known as "Edward Elgar: the sketches for Symphony No 3 elaborated by Anthony Payne" or in brief "Elgar/Payne Symphony No 3.  --  Jack of Oz [your turn] 08:49, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: No objections, so I've moved the page.  --  Jack of Oz [your turn] 23:18, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Title
Talk:Carl Frelinghuysen Gould

message: Should Prefontaine Fountain be added to this article? ---Another Believer (Talk) 05:19, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prefontaine Fountain
Talk:Mozart and Freemasonry

message: Dear 72.83.100.23, I just read the article by Peter Paul Fuchs, and I must say that I didn't see anything to support your statement. Fuchs does not "strongly dispute both the conflation of Freemasonry with Illuminati elements per se" as far as I understand. He does not suggest that the Illuminati were not Masons nor that their philosophy was in any way at odds with other views within the Masonic movement; on the contrary, he confirms that the Illuminati were Freemasons.
Nor does he suggest that Mozart did not identify with the Illuminati. What his article does say is that Mozart was not a Voltairian, and that, in parallel with his humanist views, he was a devout Catholic; and that the tension between these two somewhat opposing views is reflected in his music. "Masonry gave Mozart the ability to function incredibly well in that tension between Catholic Counter-Reformation and the Enlightenment modes," is what he writes.
Moreover, your edit suggests that there is a whole boatload of "Masonic scholars ... and non-Masonic scholars who have studied the matter more closely" who somehow disagree with what is written in the article. Fuchs makes a point in his article of pointing out that no one agrees with him. So please tell us who these Masonic scholars are.
The truth is that, in spite of Fuchs's somewhat pugnacious style, he doesn't seem to be saying anything that anyone disagrees with - that Mozart, while identified with the Illuminati, remained a devout Catholic, and that elements of both world views can be seen in his music.
What do you have to say about this? --Ravpapa (talk) 16:48, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mozart and Enlightenment 

message: We must compare our father’s conduct to a fat animal that carries its tail upon its back, but when affrighted it drops it between its legs and runs off. User:InternetHero  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.159.0.231 (talk) 08:15, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fat Animals 

message: Böri (talk) 15:25, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Franz von Walsegg was a Freemason
Talk:USS Bladen

message: As the editor who populated the infobox, I want to point out that the displacement looks supspicious.  While I have written what is recorded at DANFS, it is very different from that of its sister ship USS Gilliam (APA-57).  Need second source.  Toddst1 (talk) 16:25, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Displacment is suspicious
Category talk:Battles of the Maccabean Revolt

message: I'm not sure why this is included in the list of battles. All that really took place there according to the account is killing an unfaithful Jew and a single soldier. (1 Macc. 3:16) No other deaths are reported in the account, so how does this qualify as a "battle", or a gorilla action, as some claim? The beginning of the Maccabean revolt, yes, battle, no. Likely it was less than a handful of soldiers, one got killed and the others never fought because they were outnumbered. --Corjay (talk) 07:39, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: "Battle of Wadi-Haramia" Was Not a Battle
Talk:USS Platte (AO-186)

message: I am Barbara Babb, ENC(SW) USN (Ret).  I was stationed on USS Platte (AO-186) from May 18, 1989 - May 1994.  I WAS one of the first group of 20 females that was the initial embarkation of women aboard ship.  When we arrived we were required to provide a urinalysis supposedly to ensure we were drug free, but it was rumored these tests were also used to verify we were not pregnant.
In addition, I transited the Panama Canal onboard PLATTE and have video of our one east-west transit.  The TRIPPE did collide with PLATTE the same day as the Iowa explosion. I have a video of this shot from another ship but it was a month before I was stationed aboard her.  
We did make two trips around South America.  One in 1991 November time frame.  I also possess MANY images shot by me during my tour as well as video clips taken with a VHS camera.  
When we went alongside ships during Desert Shield/Desert Storm, we made an announcement, "Good (Morning, Afternoon, Evening) and Welcome alongside USS Platte, the Preferred Oiler in the Persian Gulf."  The referenced message traffic is available as a jpg taken from our cruise book of that deployment.
We went through jumboization in 1992.  We departed our homeport of Norfolk, Virginia February 1992 and arrived in New Orleans (Avondale Shipyard performed the jumboization) in time to witness Mardi Gras that year.  In addition, that was the year Hurricane Andrew came through.  It went around New Orleans and instead hit Baton Rouge.  I have video of the midbody launch as well as images from that time.
I have the Commissioning and Decommissioning Postcards issued when a Naval Vessel is commissioned and decommissioned.  I also have pamphlets and brochures from the time.  The bumper sticker "We Fuel Around" with the ship silhouette was changed with the arrival of women to "Proud Professional People" because the chain of command thought the original had sexual undertones.  
Further proof of the collision can be viewed here.  A video happened to be shot during it.  I am not aware if I can post here, so posted elsewhere.  <object width="425" height="350"> <param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/1XUYEyNuML0"> </param> <embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/1XUYEyNuML0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="350"> </embed> </object> Video just posted so give it a little time to finish processing.--Kites0852 (talk) 20:33, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Quacker (Tom and Jerry)

message: About the error crediting, problem will be going away in several days. TobytheTramEngine 19:55, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Crediting
Category talk:Capri, Campania

message: Is there any reason why this category is named Capri, Campania and not Capri only? Categories for Ischia, Napoli, Almafi etc, do not mention Campania. I would support renaming it and its subcats. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 08:35, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:Saint Paul City Hall and Ramsey County Courthouse

message: Is the statue in the entry way named Indian God of Peace or Vision of Peace? I've seen both names used so I'm wondering which one is correct. Eóin 21:12, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Two of the references say, "Indian God of Peace".  The other two cited references don't mention it.--Appraiser 04:08, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I looked around and saw Saint Paul, Ramsey County and the  Minnesota Historical Society use Vision of Peace. After some more searching I noticed Encarta mentioned that the name was changed in 1994. Do any other sources back that up?  Eóin 20:22, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting.  I'd love to know what politics were behind the change, since the artist had died in 1955.--Appraiser 16:08, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of the statue 

message: Nice article and hard to do this so fast. I raise you to B-class on the Wikipedia quality scale for WikiProject Minnesota (pending any argument there I think the other project may agree). Thanks very much. -Susanlesch 21:40, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Great article
Talk:USS Cortland

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 17:57, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: The following was added to the article on 2 September 2009, by User:Gerhard68, apparently a former member of the crew:
Between 5 April- 8 April 1945 she transported a load of troops from Hawaii Islands to replace troops on Midway Island and returned. This was the trip Tokyo Rose said the USS Cortland would not get to it destination.  Our radio room picked up this message while we were underway.
The Cortland also spent time in the following Island groups and country during 1945, which was not mentioned in the ship's history on the internet.
* 26 June - 8 July 1945  Entwetok, Marshall Islands
* 14 July - 18 July 1945 Ulithi, Caroline Islands
* 5 September - 8 September 1945 Jinsen, Korea for the re-occupation of this country.
We were with some of the first American ships going into Korea to take it over from the Japanese
troops.
Gatoclass (talk) 00:00, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Addendum:  to the USS Cortland History

message: 8 October 1945  The Cortland and its crew got caught in the center of a typhoon name “Louise”, which is known to have been the most furious and lethal storm ever encountered by the United States Navy’s in its entire history.
Gatoclass (talk) 09:35, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Typhoon Louise
Category talk:Arcadia, Peloponnese

message: * :Category:Arcadia to :Category:Arcadia (regional unit) – C2D per Arcadia (regional unit), Arcadia is ambiguous, see the recent RM, the base name should become a DAB with :Category:Arcadia, California, :Category:Arcadia (Odessa) and :Category:Arcadia, Wisconsin. Crouch, Swale (talk)  21:59, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opposed speedy move request
Talk:Carol D. Leonnig

message: Carol Leonnig’s husband is Philip Rucker, not someone named Reeder. 2601:602:9902:8890:65FE:5452:834C:3E44 (talk) 22:32, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Several sources disagree. Rucker appears to be a colleague at the Post.  What do you have to support your thought?  Toddst1 (talk) 20:44, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spouse: 

message: Her Post tenure section is missing her investigative work on the Secret Service and her extensive coverage of Trump. Toddst1 (talk) 05:03, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Post tenure 

message: Hello, I am Carol's sister-in-law so I may not fit the criteria to edit this page, but I wanted to alert that I feel this page may need to be updated in many ways. Carol has won four Pulitzers and a new significant award and has a new book coming out. I've noticed that this wiki page is sometimes used for writing introductions for Carol for TV and radio appearances and they are then incorrect (and I've heard others on a show correct those making the introduction when they have relied on the wiki page!). So it might be useful to update this page. I can help to provide documentation if you wish. But, most of the documentation may be found in other sources too: https://www.washingtonpost.com/pr/2024/04/27/carol-leonnig-honored-11th-annual-washington-women-journalism-awards/ MHKelley (talk) 22:03, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  New information