lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of youth subcultures

message: Could someone add a short description leading to these sections?
*Lists aren't supposed to have descriptions; just links to articles.Spylab 21:07, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neds/Chavs 

message: This article buys into and encourages high school stereotypes. I will gradually go through and weed out the crappy descriptions, but would appreciate help. we can set up a home base of sorts here. 68.35.119.42 03:27, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  In Desperate need of Cleanup 

message: I deleted a lot of junk that probably shouldn't be here. Many of the groups don't fit the definition of subculture, and descriptions are unnecessary on this page, since the names link to articles that describe the subcultures. I also deleted all groups that don't have a Wikipedia article, since there's no point of listing a group if it's not important enough to warrant its own article. I'll take another look later to see how this can be improved.Spylab 23:44, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Partial cleanup

message: The Youth culture article had the following entries:
* gangster
* rebel
I guess someone must swrite articles
* gangster (youth subculture)
* rebel (youth subculture)
if there is something to write. Also gangsta is kinda subculturish (same or not the same as gangster?). I aint no expert.
I would  also recommend to split this list into at least two major parts: music-based and "other". The first one is especially well-defined. What are other possible categories? `'mikka (t) 18:52, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Rebel

message: Is there a definite line between "true" subcultures and fandoms, groupies, etc.? `'mikka (t) 21:18, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Exactly, Juggalo I feel should be removed, as it is a fan of ICP not a subculture. Hip Hop is already there. If they are included you might as well include every band fan for maggots to the kiss army.--Gmunnywhiskers (talk) 00:08, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fandom vs. subculture 

message: Wikipedia lists are only supposed to have a brief explanatory sentence and a list of links to other Wikipedia articles. There aren't supposed to be descriptions next to those links. People are supposed to click on those links to get more information.Spylab 11:59, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Correct formatting of Wikipedia lists

message: This is in seriosu need of some references. --neonwhite  user page talk 03:52, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Regardless, alot of the entries are not sourced, either here or in the article so are unsourced OR. --neonwhite  user page talk 00:44, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Take disco for example this is a genre of music, not evidence of a subculture. The same for Vegetarianism, i think this justifies the OR tag it needs to be cleaned up to remove erroneous entries. --neonwhite  user page talk 00:49, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unreferenced 

message: Merged to List of subcultures per this discussion --Enric Naval (talk) 23:28, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  merged
Talk:Satwant Singh

message: weapon is improperly listed as a sten submachine gun under assassination in the second paragraph, when other articles and sources describe the weapon as a sterling submachine gun, low importance
i am unsure of how to edit and source wiki articles correctly, so if you have some spare time and the knowhow, the edit would be appreciated JuuJJ (talk) 06:04, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  incorrect wording
Talk:To Heart 2

message: The spacing of ToHeart2 should really be "ToHeart2" instead of "To Heart2" or other variations. Virtually all the Japanese sites use it, including the official website on Aquaplus. (http://www.aquaplus.co.jp/th2/index.html) The same would apply to ToHeart.
I vote that we maintain the spacing convention shown by the creators, just for accuracy's sake.
Karn-b 18:30, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: First header

message: Squilibob deleted a bit too much. I don't have time too fix that right now though. Shinobu 12:01, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: We decided to split the articles up into several smaller articles and expand them separately. --Squilibob 08:58, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Squilibob's split

message: I did a kinda big edit, although really changing minor grammer errors, spellings, and re-wording some stuff as it didn't fit or make a lot of sense. I saw there were some text that might of just been copied from the Japanese wiki page on this game so I worked on that. Tell me if I messed up- thanks.
24.129.239.143 06:55, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fixed up some stuff 
Talk:IRC subculture

message: This article has been bastardized by a submoron.  I'm going to delete the crap about #philosophy, but he'll most likely return and ass it up some more in order to spam us with it.
:I'm not sure where the above came from... I feel that this article does not represent the "IRC subculture" from a global perspective.  The author has only applied his experiences from one or two IRC networks, which is definitely not an accurate representation of IRC as a whole. TNLTRPB 11:24, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

message: Maybe I should try my hand at cleaning this up a bit and try to provide a broader view on the social side of IRC. As an IRCop, I do see people do some things mentioned here, but is more in the minority than what our friend states. If I'm stepping on anybody's toes here, please let me know here or on my talk page. Thanx --Brenton Scott 17:05, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can I have a crack at it? 

message: This article had a section with a globalize tag.  I removed it because it didn't seem regional to me; but if people see something that is too parochial or regional then please restore it and comment here.  RJFJR (talk) 15:36, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Globalize? 

message: "Users on IRC usually refer to a channel as a 'room' and users 'saying' something (instead of posting it) to reflect the similarity with face-to-face communication."
I've been around IRC a quite a bit and feel this part is inaccurate, people refer to channels as channels and those who refer to them as rooms are regarded as aol noobs  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.204.130.140 (talk) 17:11, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rooms 

message: Common Themes section is totally useless. Disapproving of noobs and xX_name_Xx is a global internet and offline thing: nothing to do with IRC. 77.98.244.155 (talk) 19:21, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Common Themes is useless

message: The section on 'formatting' giving examples such as %b for bold, seems rather outdated.
For the most part irc formatting standardized behind the mirc format/colour code system, and support for this is prevalent across pretty much every main stream irc client. 185.24.123.199 (talk) 05:21, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  irc formatting
Talk:Kuzman Knoll

message: What is the significance of this knoll?  Does it really deserve its own article? Rory096 03:42, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: An Antarctic geographical feature that has an official name could be regarded as significant enough to deserve its own article (if available). Place naming policies for Antarctica are fairly conservative, names are given to features ranked as if "of national significance" and correspondingly formally approved by ministers of inferior, inter-ministerial bodies, presidents or other high level authorities.  Geographical features in Antarctica would have a relatively greater significance than comparable features elsewhere because they account for nearly 100 per cent of all notable features on a given territory there. (As you can imagine this percentage would be pretty low e.g. in a city or a densely populated area where the man-made features dominate both in quantity and significance.)  The significance of an Antarctic geographical feature may be further enhanced by its relevance as a landmark in the course of field work or navigation, or if ice free. All this is taken into account when the place-naming authorities decide whether some feature merits a name or not.  In the particular case of Kuzman Knoll this additional importance due to the feature’s central location at the crossroad of several overland routes is explicitly noted in the article; it could also be seen from the linked reference map where Kuzman Knoll is shown, as well as from the illustration that I have now posted.  (It takes some time to upload the illustrations to my series of Antarctic articles, so I jumped to this one as I noticed your query.)  Apcbg 09:27, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Coat of arms of Barbados

message: :Image:Barbados coa.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
— Save_Us_229 19:29, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Barbados coa.png
Talk:The U (film)

message: Does anyone have a problem with turning this page into a disambiguation? The University of Utah and the University of Miami are both specifically referred to as, generally, "The U." - Robert, 12/16/2009
: I don't believe it should be turned into a dab page per this discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The U — X96lee15 (talk) 14:08, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Much better than having it redirect to the University of Miami. I know Miami likes to promote itself as "The U", but "The U" in general refers to University of <Insert State>, in the same way that "State" is short for what ever the local State University is.--RLent (talk) 21:51, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambig?

message: I moved "The U" to "The U (documentary)".  However, now all the history associated with "The U" is for the "new" documentary article and I don't think that's what should be what's happening.  "The U (doc)" should be a brand-new article and "The U" should keep its history. I'm not up on policy enough to know what to do in this situation. — X96lee15 (talk) 17:08, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  I screwed up the move I think 

message: Why does The U redirect to University but Talk:The U redirects to Talk:The U (film)? Shouldn't The U (film) be moved to simply The U and all redirects appropriately targeted? When one searches for "The U" they are not looking for an article about Universities in general. 01:56, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  New section
Talk:Charles B. Fulton

message: I found this article by following the link from the list of the members of Tiger Force - U.S. Army unit known for committing numerous war crimes and atrocities in Vietnam. I'm not sure if this guy served in this unit (I somehow doubt), but if I was in his place, and I haven't been in this unit, I would be most displeased with the fact that Tiger Force links directly to article about me. -- Obradović Goran  (talk 03:45, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is the same guy actually. ~Linuxerist  E/L/T 01:08, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, no it's not the same guy. Notice that the Tiger Force members are listed in 1965-1969? By this point, this particular Charles Fulton was a federal judge. He served in World War II -- not Vietnam. Capnpen (talk) 17:22, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A temporary subpage at User:Polbot/fjc/Charles Britton Fulton was automatically created by a perl script, based on this article at the Biographical Directory of Federal Judges. The subpage should either be merged into this article, or moved and disambiguated. Polbot (talk) 21:04, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Bot-created subpage
Talk:Dementia 13

message: The article about the song " American Girl" by Tom Petty and the Heartbreakers claims that the song's opening line, "She was an American girl, raised on promises", comes from Dementia 13.  Do you know if this is correct?  Can you provide a citation?  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 165.123.89.65 (talk) 16:05, August 20, 2007 (UTC) 
:Someone tried to insert that particular tidbit into the Dementia 13 article some months ago.  At that time, I did a cursory Google search and came up with nothing.  I subsequently deleted the claim from the article.  Based on your comment, I just did another search with equally negative results.  It appears this is strictly bogus, so I removed it from the American Girl article.  If somebody can find a reliable source backing up the claim, the info should be reinstated.-Hal Raglan 03:10, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tom Petty lyric 

message: "Thinking quickly, the scheming Louise throws the fresh corpse over the side of the boat, where they both come to rest at the bottom of the lake."
Both? I assume the other thing is the radio. WilliamSommerwerck (talk) 10:32, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: garbled sentence

message: This article is incomplete and is missing important citations for its information. Information on the film's theatrical release is missing from the article and needs to be added to the article as a sub-section in the Release section and should include the film's box office gross. The Response (now renamed Reception) section needs to be rewritten so that it includes the film's initial response and later response which should be in sub sections if enough information warrants it. There also needs to be information on the film's legacy (Coppola would go on to write and direct several acclaimed films after this), and remake which is to be released this year. All of this information will need proper citations for its information and should not be from IMDb. This article has potential like most articles to advance towards GA and FA status if enough attention is given to it. Hopefully the right person comes along to give this article the attention it needs.--Paleface Jack (talk) 17:24, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup and citation
Talk:Humanoids from the Deep

message: The page of the 1996 remake of this film is named https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humanoids_from_the_Deep_(film) -- which seems like it should be the page name of this first film. So shouldn't the names of both pages be changed to match wikipedia conventions?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:BEF0:EB40:B736:AE23:9C2F:D05E (talk) 22:11, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Manurewa

message: Anon. editor added phrase "Rewa Hard" etc, which does not adhere to Wikipedia Neutral POV. However the catch phrase maybe cited else where in the article at a later stage as part of coll. lanuage used by residents (please note that I have asked friends still in Manurewa and they have not hear of this phrase. Therefore added cat for POV-Check. Tom Webb 03:57, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the line you are objecting to, and the POV tag. Please re-add it if you are still not satisfied.-gadfium 05:18, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for that GadfiumTom Webb 08:00, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Could someone please add the correct pronunciation? Is it like "Manure-wa" or is it "Ma-nu-re-wa" or something else? Google says Rootsweb  has a post saying the pronunciation is " (Mar- Noo- Re-wah)" but the post does not show up. Thanks. Edison 20:44, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciation

message: The discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Papatoetoe Seventh-day Adventist Community church merged that church article into Papatoetoe. This church also does not appear to meet the standards for a separate article per WP:CHURCH, and I suggest it be merged into this article.-gadfium 05:41, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Manurewa Seventh-day Adventist church

message: There are currently three notable people listed as being from Manurewa. What is this? When did John Walker get dropped from the list? He’s a world record setting 1500 m Olympic gold medalist - it’s not even ancient history. 2A04:EE41:6:93CB:D5F9:A01F:DA1C:3980 (talk) 00:17, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable people
Talk:Slush Puppie

message: Does anyone in the UK know if they still sell this in newsagents, corner shops and the like? I remember that they used to when I was a kid, but perhaps this has changed, so I don't want to add it to the article without checking. Fourohfour 12:21, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: UK

message: We shouldn't go through naming the different mixes of flavors you can make because there are so many. My friends and I have come up with a name for almost every combo, but they are by no means offical or even commonly used. "ghost" and "suicide" are probaly the only ones that are universal names. Moberho 01:15, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, I'd like a citation for those too... Fourohfour 11:43, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Flavor Mixes

message: Removed a portion that said Insert Text, or something... not relevant to the article.
James mcaninch 01:08, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No need to justify trivial stuff like that, it's probably a typo or incorrect cut-and-paste, or... whatever! Fourohfour 17:44, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove Un-needed Code 

message: Edited entry to note that while Slush Puppie and Slurpee are used often used as synonymous terms they are in fact two separate products.  It previously stated that they were synonymous.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.23.152.18 (talk) 02:05, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slush Puppie and Slurpee. 

message: I removed the following text from the article:
:The unique spelling of "puppie," which represents a floppy eared dog, was added to bring attention to both the name and the product."Frozen in time: Slush Puppie still hot after 27 years, Cincinnati Enquirer, January 18, 1998. 
In the first place, it makes no sense to say that the spelling represents a dog; it's the term that does, and it need not be floppy-eared. Second, and most importantly, none of the sources linked mention the spelling (which in any case is not unique, just anachronistic; the OED cites a number of sources using it). 161.73.82.133 (talk) 08:38, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling 

message: Stop Slush puppies 185.57.215.36 (talk) 14:18, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stop Slush Puppies
Talk:Ōtara

message: Added Point of View Check due to comments over merits of one High School over another. Don't know enough about the schools merits, but the comments seem not to comply with Neutral POV. Tom Webb 04:00, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the comments on the schools entirely, and cleaned up other POV statements a bit. It could do with more work, but I think the POV tag is no longer needed. Please re-add it if you disagree.-gadfium 05:14, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd have thought that it is the other way round, with Hilary College being better than Tangaroa College (which is my local  school). Although I'd have to look up their ratings to be sure about that. Do at least agree it was written in a very non-NPOV. Mathmo 00:48, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have changed the description of "white people" (I couldn't think of a better term)from Pākehā to New Zealand European, but have included Pākehā as an alternate term. I think to people outside New Zealand the term Pākehā is not very descriptive where as New Zealand European is pretty self explanatory (although still not completely accurate). I see in the history there has some been debate a couple of reverts about this, but I hope this can be a compromise in the absence of a totally accepted term for pale skinned New Zealand citizens. Leaderofearth 10:17, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: New Zealand European V Pākehā

message: no consensus to move--RegentsPark (sticks and stones) 03:46, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Otara → Ōtara —
Cheers Gadfium for the heads up on doing this properly.  In light of which, I'd like to suggest this page be moved from "Otara" to "Ōtara".  Does this require explanation/justification?  I'm assuming the reasons would be self-evident to any interested parties.--Te Irirangi (talk) 16:33, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

text: I think this might be a useful test case. Our existing convention, set out at Wikipedia:Naming conventions (New Zealand)#Place names, is not to use a macron when the Māori and English spellings are otherwise identical. I note that Te Ara uses the macron (see for example http://www.teara.govt.nz/Places/Auckland/AucklandPlaces/16/en), but the New Zealand Geographic Board Ngā Pou Taunaha o Aotearoa does not appear to do so (see for example the entry for Flat Bush on page 24 of New Zealand Gazetteer of Official Geographic Names (20 July 2009). I'll put a notice up at New Zealand Wikipedians' notice board about it.-gadfium 20:28, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

text: Is the redirect and the use of macrons in the article not sufficient? Standard keyboards do not produce letters with macrons so on the principle of least surprise Otara is probably the better of the two options although it will be not much of a surprise if the alternative is used. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 21:02, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Otara/Ōtara