lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Sport in Scotland

message: "Netball is played mostly by private school girls."  Would they not play it in state schools, if not what would the team sport be, just field hockey? Hakluyt bean (talk) 23:07, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  netball 

message: Evidently that is played in Scotland, probably only as a private school sport (eg: http://www.strathallan.co.uk/All-Sports.aspx)  Hakluyt bean (talk) 23:20, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: this list is getting ridiculous, what about hopscotch, tidlywinks?(Monkeymanman (talk) 15:00, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  rounders 

message: There ere no US air bases in Scotland in the 1930s.  I can find no evidence for US occupation at East Fortune (see "never used" comments in Wikipedia article on RAF East Fortune).  Kirknewton was used by US forces in 1950s and 1960s.  Section needs supporting references.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wundermac (talk • contribs) 21:04, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  baseball
Talk:Hot Hot Hot (meme)

message: Removed this POV editorializing:
:(This stereotype, of course, discounts the fact Thomas Jefferson was a sophisticated and successful "mountain man" of the Appalachian region long before anyone ever thought of the hillbilly stereotype).
In addition, Jefferson was born and lived in Albemarle County, east of the Appalachian region ( see map. Jokestress 20:20, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: POV removal

message: I don't see what's so funny with the video. Is it because the school is in the Appalachian Mountains and people like bashing it?TheKid 19:33, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As Satchmo said, if you have to ask, you'll never know. Jokestress 20:19, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: I don't get it
Talk:You Can't Put Your Arms Around a Memory

message: Didn't the Mighty Wahs also do this song?--Darrelljon 20:32, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: They did, aye. I'll put my editing hat on.87.82.17.43 12:43, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Mighty Wahs

message: Why is the song posted under "You Can't Put Your Arms Around a Memory" when the album and single both call it "You Can't Put Your Arms Round a Memory" ? --Redrkr 10:32, 26 March 2009 (EDT)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 148.142.66.110 (talk)  
Seconded. 2fs (talk) 20:21, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: According to Nina Antonia's biography of Thunders, "Johnny Thunders -- In Cold Blood", this song was written before Thunders was even a member of the New York Dolls, and years before he'd ever tried heroin.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.204.160.220 (talk) 05:10, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Subject of the Song 

message: the song is a love song. it was written before he had used heroin and before he met sable.  the title was taken from a line in a rom com television show.  it is about remorse and regret, the pain of missing someone. EVERY rock and roll song ever made has been interpretated to be about drugs or heroin or getting high. Just because people say climate change is not man-man, or that the election was stolen, etc. doesn't justify sticking it in.  the song is clearly not about heroin and its vulgar to say so.  it is bad taste, and frankly stupid, because of course a junkie can only write about being a junkie. its sterotype and dehumanizing.  it shouldnt be in there until a good reason is expressed for it to be so.  i also question the obsession with including it in here.  why is it so important for you to say a song that a heroin addict wrote is about heroin? are you a heroin addict? is the myth of drugs and rock important to you? please be objective and use your brain, thank you. 71.95.161.14 (talk) 13:03, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm afraid you can't simply remove a sourced statement that an interpretation exists, because you disagree with that interpretation. Notably, that source also supports that the song pre-dated the Dolls. (FWIW, I don't interpret the song as being about heroin, either.) The one sentence that you seem to object to is not given undue weight. Trying to scour references to drugs as "vulgar" and "bad taste" seems a weird way to show respect for Johnny Thunders. Perhaps find source(s) showing other interpretations (and I'd guess they are out there), and adding them to the article would be a better approach. CAVincent (talk) 15:05, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  subject matter of song
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject The Beatles/Log

message: BOLD revert discuss. I was bold, you reverted, so here I am... I think there's merit in tracking every DYK because I want this project to get a rep that whatever we nominate makes it. (I personally am batting 1000 on self authored DYK noms...) So I think there is merit in tracking WHY Capitol Mumble didn't get selected... Discuss. ++Lar: t/c 20:45, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: DYK is a big thing of yours, I personally don't think it's a very big deal :) In fact, the only time I visit the front page is if I click on the Wikipedia icon by accident. That - different perspectives - is probably the root of the problem! So, let's see what others say. I might be wrong on this, but I felt we only need to log successes, with the exception of AFD because if we nomiminate an article for AFD and it gets kept we're snookered. Anyway, let's see what Mal or random others think :) --kingboyk 21:22, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Did You Know

message: I thought it wouldn't be fair to claim this as a "new article" for the project, since it wasn't AFAIK created by a project member, and the Beatles involvement is peripheral. So, I'll record it here instead:
*The Sundown Playboys, one of the more obscure Apple Records recording artists, now have an article.
--kingboyk 17:52, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: List them. Then make up a big showy thank you box to leave on the editor's talk page... something like the current "hey I saw you around" invite box but with text thanking them... ++Lar: t/c 23:55, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Wouldn't necessarily be appropriate to leave the invite in these 2 cases, as one is a cajun band who released a sole single on Apple and the other is a school :-) --kingboyk 00:50, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, a box that thanks but doesn't invite? ++Lar: t/c 01:21, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think so. I think there's a strong chance they're not "Beatle people" nor that they found the article on our todo list; and if they did find it on the todo list they already know about the project! :-) --kingboyk 11:43, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK (from beautiful Breezewood, Pennsylvania).. then I guess I'm not sure what you're asking when you say "what are we going to do about... ?"... Can you clarify what you're asking about? Thanks! ++Lar: t/c 00:22, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Just whether or not to log them as new project-created articles or not - but I've already done it :-) Have a great holiday! --kingboyk 01:16, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, ok. Well... I think the way you logged them is just fine, then. They're articles, they are noted to have come into existance, (we're presumably therefore happy about it!) but we're not taking credit for them where it's not due. Spot on. ++Lar: t/c 01:59, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Other new articles
Talk:Shakespearean romances

message: Seeing how Wikipedia has gotten, I'm gonna say now, no I can't link you to X Literary Journal: The New Shakespearean Romances or whatever.  Go to your local bookstore and open up a recent version of any of these plays and it should back me up.  Even in not so recent versions I see references to these for plays as romances, and my English teacher, who's been teaching Shakespeare for decades has adopted this classification, hence I think WIkipedia needs an article on it. --Quintucket 20:59, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. We should either have an article on the five Romances — and possibly elucidating on the classification and its history — or Shakespearean romances should be a redirect to the appropriate part of Shakespearean comedy or possibly a Classification of Shakespeare's plays (this latter dealing with the not insignificant amount of ink expended on the issue). --Xover (talk) 21:23, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Romances'' classification
Talk:Volkswagen Rabbit GTI

message: When I access the article, I am greeted with

Yet I see no discussion on this page other than a request for a video.  Does anyone object to me removing the tag?--216.140.58.174 00:41, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd say the neutrailty is very questionable.  It reads more like a fan letter than a neutral encyclopaedic article.  It's peppered with meaningless subjective phrases ("vehicle of many dimensions", "versatile", "machines of speed, joy and fun" - come on).  May well be moot - up for deletion, possibly merger.  Cain Mosni 15:27, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality Dispute? 

message: I have removed the images in this article as they have been uploaded to the wikimedia commons where thay are marked as 'fair use'. Fair use images are not allowed on the commons and so these images will be deleted shortly. If these images are considered essential to this page then I recommend uploading them to wikipedia under the fair use policy. commons:User:JeremyA 19:01, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images
Talk:Nodens (Cthulhu Mythos)

message: Nodens (Cthulhu mythos)
→ Nodens (Cthulhu Mythos)
– Move to version most commonly used by authors, critics, and scholars. -,-~R'lyehRising~-,- 21:03, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. —Nightstallion (?) Seen this already? 08:57, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: "Nodens (Lord of the Great Abyss or Nuada of the Silver Hand)"
There is no reference on the page linking Nodens and Nuada. What is the connection? Ricardo Dirani (talk) 20:55, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Nodens & Nuada
Talk:Daisy Dukes

message: "
[[----
Woa wait a minute !  If you are going to name daisy dukes as only the shorts and not the pantyhose underneath like Jessica Simpson DID NOT WEAR - your definition is way off.  Dallllisy Dukes in my mind will always be associated with their original wearer - Catherine Bach who wore pantyhose under those sexy shorts in every episode.  Daisy Dukes, are tan or suntan pantyhose underneath short form fitting denim cut-offs.  I go back to the history of the term as the foundation of the definition - not that it's incorrect for words to change meanings- but how many hours in episodes did Catherine Bach make wearing that amazing outfit vs. how many hours in movie time where Jessia Simpson wears only the shorts?  History and numbers are my basis for the original and correct definition]] of the term. Without the pantyhose, your just wearing short denim cut-offs.  By the way the term "daisy dukes" was coined a long time before Duice, and Jessica Simpson came onto the scene. (like 20 years prior.)"
Moved March 26th CaravaggioFan 21:06, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: As originally posted by:24.10.15.156 

message: I have once again removed the speculatory statements made about whether the term would have remained without the Duice song. I can attest that the term has been in constant use since soon after the show aired, with no lapses (though the actual wearing of said shorts has waxed and waned). This article is not a place for Duice fanboyism. Just the facts, ma'am. --Darksasami 17:58, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Duice and Dukes
Talk:Leaders Not Followers

message: This song is a cover to the legendary chilean band Pentagram. Not to the Pentagram that is linked.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.239.135.150 (talk) 04:30, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Demoniac Possesion
Talk:Heather Stewart-Whyte

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Edofedinburgh 03:08, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: Franck Ferrando was his real name, the other names were aliases E.Polti (talk) 20:31, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aliases
Talk:Assad Kotaite

message: Hello I want to know about accent of british languages  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.173.238.53 (talk) 11:23, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Please post your question on a Talk page relevant to that topic such as British languages. The purpose of this Talk page is for discusssion relevant to former ICAO official Assad Kotaite. --TommyBoy (talk) 22:34, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Prince Nirajan of Nepal

message: There's a right way and a wrong way to present this. User 67.49.146.231 made some rather loaded edits, professing Prince Dipendra's innocence in a rather hamhanded way. I removed the unsourced paragraphs, and the citations-needed tag, since all I left was the cited lead. I will try and expand the article sometime in the future. I won't remove the NPOV until I've added some more, even though it was added without any discussion on this page and in reality probably should be removed. I just know people tend to wig out whenever you remove their precious NPOV tag. In the future, any unsourced nonsense will be reverted. General Epitaph (talk) 22:20, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Cleanup
Template talk:Chrysler vehicles

message: Useful template, but the captions Cars and especially Trucks/SUVs aren't immediately recognizable as lining up with the centered lists of vehicles. I might have fixed this by the time you read this. ProhibitOnions 21:34, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Left alignment?

message: Someone forgot the bullet to a tag, creating a welcome message instead. also fixed and properly redirected it to the proper page. Shocuda (talk) 15:17, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Fixed template
Talk:Wal-Mart employee and labor relations

message: This article was split from Debates over Wal-Mart. Any history prior to March 26, 2006 can be found in that article, and some material was previously split from the main Wal-Mart article. -- MisterHand 21:36, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  New article 

message: I have proposed a major change involving this article, see Talk:Criticism of Wal-Mart#List of criticisms of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. for rationale.  Tuxide 17:06, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of criticisms of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 

message: As per Talk:Wal-Mart workforce diversity.  Tuxide 19:04, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: My main concern is POV.  Since this is one of the many articles on the criticism of Wal-Mart, and since such lawsuits are more events than criticism (and the one in question is class action), I'd hate to represent such lawsuits as if they are criticism instead.  Tuxide 03:12, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Splitsection

message: I am proposing the merges and splits on this article.  Content about class action suits should get their own whatever v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. articles and have links provided from whatever is considered to be the main Wal-Mart article in this situation.  Also, I strongly disagree that this article should exist.  Tuxide 20:23, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have marked two of these sections as  since both sections were lifted directly from .  Splitting them as they are would be copyvio.  Tuxide 20:36, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

text: That seems like a good idea. Once the lawsuit info is put into their own articles, then I would recommend taking the remaining content in this article, cleaning it up a bit, and merging it into Wal-Mart employee and labor relations. Dr. Cash 18:17, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Am marking this article as  to do the edits I proposed above and per Derek.cashman.  If it's still there in a couple hours, then remove it for I have gone to work.  Tuxide 19:34, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have done the copyediting and the splitsection that I proposed earlier; however I haven't merged this article yet.  I've just added the templates here, and I'll let it float around a while longer. Tuxide 21:24, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merges and splits
Talk:2004 NCAA Division I men's basketball tournament

message: I'm not sure how to edit the bracket, but the final is wrong -- it says that Georgia Tech won.  The score is right, though.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.237.214.226 (talk) 21:37, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Can we come up with something consistent for all of these pages, preferably something like there is for the 2006 page?  The table seems very cluttered, and a lot of the info (like how the team finished) is easily found elsewhere.  fuzzy510 09:17, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: At the moment, the team listing is the only way to tell who won/lost the third place games... this information certainly needs to be incorporated into the brackets. I'm in the process of adding conference information and logos to the team listing, ala the 2006 tourney. --Dantheox 14:00, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Personally, the old one can go altogether if you ask me (outside of the third-place games).  The only information there that's really that worthwhile is the team name and the seed.  The coach isn't really that relevant, and the rest is all available in the brackets.  That, and the current table just looks bad. fuzzy510 21:48, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Qualifying Teams

message: Connecticut is the only team that had both men and women winning the National Championship in the same year.  This happened in 2004, and again in 2014.  Can someone please add this into the article, in an appropriate section?  Thanks.   Go, Huskies!  Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 18:38, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  UConn
Talk:.jp

message: Why do most companies register under .co.jp? For example, http://www.bandai.co.jp exists, but http://www.bandai.jp (nicer) does not exist. --Abdull 21:43, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Until recently the .jp was unavailibe. .co.jp developed a loyalty and remains exclusive. 68.148.123.76 (talk) 08:17, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The above is in error.  Reading right-to-left is the interpretation: depending upon registration  an optional country cTLD like .us, .uk, .fr, then either the 3-character type, or it’s 2-character abbreviation when cTLD is used: .com - commercial, .org - organization, .gov - government, then the actual unique domain name: google, yahoo, microsoft, and finally an optional further division or sub-domain name: www. - generic World-Wide-Web, news. - current events, search. - lookup, or other custom notion relevant to the website. WurmWoodeT 23:27, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Hierarchy

message: its has solid reputation sort of business standard.Besides top level domains which signify country are not always judged just as such. See .tv
:NOT a case of popularity. Simply a designation of category: .com - commercial, .net - network, .org - organization, .gov - government.  WurmWoodeT 23:27, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The same reason .com is popular
Wikipedia talk:Article assessment/Hugo Award-winning works

message: Did Animal Farm win a Hugo? Tom Harrison Talk 21:44, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right; I hadn't noticed it said "science fiction". Tom Harrison Talk 19:55, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Again, 2001: A Space Odyssey is a film. The criteria for this assesment is science fiction novels. I hope no one objects to me removing it. Yarnalgo 00:25, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Seeing no objection, I added Doomsday Book (novel) and will stop here, as I don't want to create too much work for others.  I just noticed a couple of omissions that are favorites of mine.  Thanks for being accomodating....now I'll try and find a way to change that template to add Doomsday Book. Jwrosenzweig 04:24, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

text: You have to update it manually, I just went through and updated it.
Geo.plrd 00:01, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Saad Eddin Ibrahim

message: Even in such a short article there are a large number of opinionated terms and "scary quote". This article could be improved if direct quotes could be given, especially for under criticism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by David Cheater (talk • contribs) 22:22, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm inclined to agree, due to a lack of sources, and considering that this is a biography of a living person, I am going to remove the contentious unsourced section due to potential POV. If someone can point me to a credible source for the information, I will support reinsertion. Basser g 00:05, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 
Talk:Eileen Caddy

message: I gave as my "reason" in the dubious tag
: The comma *must* be a typo, or if not, someone's mental tic: who would parse the sentence so -- defying the syntax -- rather than either no comma (or perhaps commas both before and after the prep'l phrase)??}} is like a ship without a rudder.
I can't find on-line the work that was cited, nor an excerpt that includes the wording. I'm at a loss as to whether to attribute the bizarre punctuation to a careless contributor, or to the uh, different, point of view on how to structure thots, of a highly atypical mind.--Jerzy•t 03:25, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious 
Template talk:NANPA area code map

message: I understand what you're trying to accomplish, but as this template exists today it mixes article references that should be under a "See also" section header, and external links that should be under an "External links" header.  I'm not sure you can accomplish the correct split with a single template since these sections may already exist in articles where you add the template. —RandallJones 22:09, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Also, why is the link to List of ZIP Codes in the United States part of this template?—msh210℠ 18:54, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Per WP:GTL, external links don't belong in a See also section, so I've cleaned up the external links. areacode-info.com is all over; I'm worried it's just to drive traffic to the site for advertising. A link to a 60-year-old area code map hardly seems relevant. There's an internal link to NAMP (and it's free to have an external link to NAMP), so I don't see why it's needed here. -- Mikeblas 10:49, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Mixed internal and external links

message: This template should be deleted for the following reasons:
*It combines internal and external links in one location.  External links should be listed separately under the "External links" section, per WP:EL#Points to remember #2.
*It includes a general link to North American Numbering Plan Administration.  External links should be directly related to the subject of the article, per WP:EL#Links normally to be avoided #14.  This link is especially redundant considering that a wikilink to North American Numbering Plan Administration is already provided.
*Two additional external links point to the same area code map at two different websites.  While a map link is useful, two links is redundant.    http://www.whitepages.com is a commercial website relying on ad revenue. It seems to be included here solely to generate traffic, which is discouraged under WP:Spam#External link spamming.
I don't see any way to redeem this template.  It should be removed completely from the area code articles. The two internal links should be listed under the "See also" section of each article, while the relevant NANPA map link should be included separately under the "External links" section.--JKeene (talk) 20:56, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Modified per discussion: Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion#Template:Area_code_footer.--JKeene (talk) 23:12, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion