Talk:Stephen Grossberg

message: I'd like to point out that most of the content of this article was apparently added by Stephen Grossberg himself on Oct 21, 2007. A lot of the information seems POV (i.e. frequently praising Grossberg) or unnecessary (the paragraph full of acronyms and terms). Anyone have any suggestions on fixing it up? I'll wait a couple days to hear from others before trying a quick clean up. digfarenough (talk) 21:04, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  autobiography 

message: The tone of the entire article is very POV; or perhaps he truly has done all the things he claims? Echoing the above comments, if he really has done so, there should be no problem citing a peer-reviewed scientific paper for each and everyone - he is a scientist after all. I am quite familiar with most of the topics discussed in the article and could go through and address each one individually, providing evidence where needed to explain why it either 1) was not introduced by Grossberg, 2) lacks the accounting of colleagues sufficiently or 3) just does not have the impact claimed here in the article, however the burden of evidence is clearly on the writer of this article.
It fails on many points in Biographies_of_living_persons not worth noting because it fails at the first hurdle, namely "Contentious material about living persons (or, in some cases, recently deceased) that is unsourced or poorly sourced – whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable – should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion." I posit that the unsourced claims are contentious because many in the field disagree with Grossberg's claims to have invented/pioneered so much!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 153.229.65.187 (talk) 13:39, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Agree with autobiography point above; but I'm writing this in 2015 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Stephen Grossberg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060622025200/http://www.inns.org/nnjournal.asp to http://www.inns.org/nnjournal.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:02, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: ... and decided to at least do something about it rather than to keep on complaining. To that end, I removed a bunch of info that was clearly added by Grossberg or someone close to him. Having difficulties finding sources and I did not touch the research and other sections underneath, because I'm not too well versed in the field and have hard time judging what should stay and what should not. 
However, I think overall the page contains intricate detail that is only interesting to a small number of people, and even they would probably look at scientific publications, rather than Wikipedia (hopefully).Corantor (talk) 12:24, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Agree with autobiography point above; but I'm writing this in 2019... 

message: I've deleted this sentence : 
Still other scientists call it the Cohen-Grossberg-Hopfield model.Recurrent neural networks
Since the only 'other scientists' which refer this model are actually Grossberg himself at the cited scholarpedia term.
It seems that there a debate regarding the first right about this model but the contribution of Grossberg (other than in here) is not clear.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yonkatz (talk • contribs) 12:38, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Self referencing