Talk:Legal & General

message: A few days ago the information on LGFL was removed without any reason given in the edit summary or on the talk page. I have put it back in.
If there is a reason for removing the information, could you please say what it is either in the summary or the talk page?
Looking at the number of brands / offices, LGFL is one of the largest Estate Agencies in the UK, so I feel it deserves a mention.
:It may have just been a "clueless newbie" testing things out.  --Merovingian (t) (c) (e) 08:35, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: LGFL

message: Barclays Bank still continue to sell Legal & General assurance and insurance products to their customers. Irrespective of the joint venture in Gresham. I believe Gresham deal with equity, not insurance products. Therefore I re-included Barclays in the list of partners, and moved the information about Gresham into the history section. --Phydaux 22:45, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Legal & General's Strategic Partners

message: I'm not sure why Bucklersbury House was put as L&G's HQ however it isn't it's Temple Court, and it will be changing to One Coleman Street later this year.
To check a company's addrs you can check the stock exchange they belong to e.g.:
--Phydaux 10:08, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Legal & General HQ

message: Should the revenue stat be million, not billion? Even so, it does not seem to match up well with BusinessWeek. Can someone please verify? Thanks. Wikiphile1603 (talk) 22:06, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: you are correct that it should be million not billion; for the actual figure see Annual Report Page 75 Dormskirk (talk) 12:24, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious 

message: Is this long list of clients/partners really worthwhile? Wikiphile1603 (talk) 22:29, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Client list 

message: L&G bought a business unit from Met in the 30's. At no point did they own the company itself, which continues to this day as an independent and rather larger corporation than L&G. Pretty bizarre error, even by wikipedia standards.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.15.253.179 (talk) 04:38, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  LOL what L&G doesn't own Met Life 

message: "In 1999, Legal & General announced plans to merge its business with that of the National Westminster Bank to form the first 'bancassurance' company in the UK."
Would it really have been the first? Abbey National (as it then was) became the first with it's purchase of Scotish Mutual in 1992. We then had Halifax taking over Clerical Medical in 1997, and Lloyds TSB was already in the process of buying Scottish Widows at the time of the ultimately abortive takeover bid of L&G by Natwest.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.155.110.65 (talk) 01:47, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Legal & General. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080724080538/http://www.legalandgeneralgroup.com/about-us/milestones-1800-1950.cfm to http://www.legalandgeneralgroup.com/about-us/milestones-1800-1950.cfm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080724080218/http://www.legalandgeneralgroup.com/about-us/milestones-1960-1980.cfm to http://www.legalandgeneralgroup.com/about-us/milestones-1960-1980.cfm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:42, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Legal & General. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20170410050451/http://www.essentialsurrey.co.uk/theatre-arts/vera-brittain/ to http://www.essentialsurrey.co.uk/theatre-arts/vera-brittain/
*Added archive https://archive.is/20120802063104/http://www.financeweek.co.uk/cgi-bin/item.cgi?id=1295 to http://www.financeweek.co.uk/cgi-bin/item.cgi?id=1295
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090730090725/http://www.legalandgeneralgroup.com/investors/releasedetail.cfm?releaseid=154685 to http://www.legalandgeneralgroup.com/investors/releasedetail.cfm?releaseid=154685
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120314160602/http://www.ifaonline.co.uk/ifaonline/news/1340356/l-g-agrees-gbp62m-deal-suffolk-life?page=ifa2006_articleimport&tempPageName=746283 to http://www.ifaonline.co.uk/ifaonline/news/1340356/l-g-agrees-gbp62m-deal-suffolk-life?page=ifa2006_articleimport&tempPageName=746283
*Added archive https://archive.is/20130127161734/http://www.legalandgeneralgroup.com/media-centre/press-releases/2012/group-news-release-directoratechangegroupchiefexecutive.html to http://www.legalandgeneralgroup.com/media-centre/press-releases/2012/group-news-release-directoratechangegroupchiefexecutive.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:51, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Legal & General. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150918193022/http://www.surreymirror.co.uk/Legal-General-proposes-leave-Kingswood/story-26714863-detail/story.html to http://www.surreymirror.co.uk/Legal-General-proposes-leave-Kingswood/story-26714863-detail/story.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:34, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Legal & General America is the U.S. insurance arm of Legal & General. They offer life insurance, retirement planning, and claim settlement services to customers in the United States. I believe there needs to be clarity on the US origins, structure of the company, and US history since there is no information on WIkipedia of subsidiary brands Banner Life Insurance Company and William Penn Life insurance Company of New York that are owned by the US arm. In fact there is not much information about the US arm and there are nearly 1,000 employees in the US. 
Here are some resources to cite a potential addition: .. . .  
       
Note COI.KHLGA (talk) 16:30, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi - We seek to give a global view of companies on wikipedia and while I appreciate that the company has nearly 1,000 employees in the US that may not be notable in the context of a company with nearly 9,000 employees globally. Best wishes. Dormskirk (talk) 17:42, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification Request 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:06, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: L&G is putting Cala Homes up for sale (Construction Enquirer source). Perhaps the mention of Cala should be included in the history (controlling stake acquired in 2018), and perhaps related to the failure of L&G Modular; it looks like a final exit from a shortlived entry into housebuilding. Paul W (talk) 09:42, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, there was an amount of material that had previously sat (arguably incorrectly) within Operations which is now (probably more correctly) located within the history. Cala Homes is probably another example of that, and this looks like a good opportunity to move it out of Operations and into the history. However, as you say, this was a short-lived venture and also outside the company's main line of business, so please keep the mention relatively concise. Axad12 (talk) 10:12, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Added two lines to History, removing Cala from Operations. Paul W (talk) 13:49, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cala Homes