Talk:Spiritual ecology

message: This article focuses perhaps too much on the same content as Religion and ecology. I would think that Religion and ecology should be the main article, and this would serve as a spin-off, summary style, eventually, because not all religious work on ecology/environmentalism is spiritual (as I think mentioned in this article itself). Thanks. HG | Talk 17:45, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overlapping content 

message: * http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?as_q=sacred+ecology&num=10&btnG=Search+Scholar&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_occt=title&as_sauthors=&as_publication=&as_ylo=&as_yhi=&as_sdt=1.&as_sdtp=on&as_sdts=5&hl=en
--58.38.41.104 (talk) 02:49, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  What are the differences among the following and this topic.....??? 

message: * http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?as_q=animal+ecology&num=10&btnG=Search+Scholar&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_occt=title&as_sauthors=&as_publication=&as_ylo=&as_yhi=&as_sdt=1.&as_sdtp=on&as_sdts=5&hl=en&newwindow=1
--58.38.41.104 (talk) 04:30, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Animal 

message: * http://scholar.google.com.au/scholar?as_q=aquatic+ecology&num=10&btnG=Search+Scholar&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_occt=title&as_sauthors=&as_publication=&as_ylo=&as_yhi=&as_sdt=1.&as_sdtp=on&as_sdts=5&hl=en
* Aquatic ecosystem
--58.38.41.104 (talk) 04:47, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aquatic 

message: * http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?hl=en&newwindow=1&q=allintitle%3A+marine+ecology&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=&as_vis=0
--58.38.41.104 (talk) 04:26, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marine 

message: * http://scholar.google.com.au/scholar?hl=en&q=allintitle%3A+terrestrial+ecology&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=&as_vis=0
--58.38.41.104 (talk) 04:53, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terrestrial 

message: * http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?as_q=avian+ecology&num=10&btnG=Search+Scholar&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_occt=title&as_sauthors=&as_publication=&as_ylo=&as_yhi=&as_sdt=1.&as_sdtp=on&as_sdts=5&hl=en
--58.38.41.104 (talk) 04:58, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Avian 

message: * Behavioral ecology
--58.38.41.104 (talk) 04:31, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Social...??? 

message: ==== Buddhism ====
* http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?hl=en&q=allintitle%3A+buddhist+ecology&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=&as_vis=0
--58.38.41.104 (talk) 03:26, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Religious 

message: * http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?hl=en&q=allintitle%3A+buddhist+ecology&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=&as_vis=0
--58.38.41.104 (talk) 03:26, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Buddhism 

message: * http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?hl=en&q=allintitle%3A+christian+ecology&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=&as_vis=0
--58.38.41.104 (talk) 03:28, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Christian 

message: *  http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?hl=en&q=allintitle%3A+catholic+ecology&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=&as_vis=0
--58.38.41.104 (talk) 03:29, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Catholics 

message: * http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?as_q=orthodoxy+ecology&num=10&btnG=Search+Scholar&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_occt=title&as_sauthors=&as_publication=&as_ylo=&as_yhi=&as_sdt=1.&as_sdtp=on&as_sdts=5&hl=en
--58.38.41.104 (talk) 04:03, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orthodox 

message: * http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?hl=en&q=allintitle%3A+islamic+ecology&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=&as_vis=0
* http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?hl=en&q=allintitle%3A+muslim+ecology&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=&as_vis=0
--58.38.41.104 (talk) 03:34, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Islam 

message: * http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?hl=en&q=allintitle%3A+vedic+ecology&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=&as_vis=0
--58.38.41.104 (talk) 03:32, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hinduism 

message: * http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?hl=en&q=allintitle%3A+taoist+ecology&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=&as_vis=0
Don't know why there is little of the info found
--58.38.41.104 (talk) 03:39, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taoism 

message: * http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?hl=en&q=allintitle%3A+jewish+ecology&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=&as_vis=0
--58.38.41.104 (talk) 03:45, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Judaism 

message: * http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?as_q=shinto+ecology&num=10&btnG=Search+Scholar&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_occt=title&as_sauthors=&as_publication=&as_ylo=&as_yhi=&as_sdt=1.&as_sdtp=on&as_sdts=5&hl=en
--58.38.41.104 (talk) 03:48, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shinto 

message: * http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?hl=en&q=allintitle%3A+confucian+ecology&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=&as_vis=0
--124.78.213.158 (talk) 09:21, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confucianism 

message: --58.38.41.104 (talk) 03:55, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Welcome to add more 

message: 76.90.226.80 (talk) 22:21, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Preabrahamic polytheist AKA Pagan  

message: This entire article is copy/pasted from http://spiritualecology.org/about-spiritual-ecology , so I flagged it as a neutrality issue. Not sure if that's the protocol but it's definitely a one sided perspective.
:This article was NOT copy/pasted FROM http://spiritualecology.org/about-spiritual-ecology. The Wiki article was created first and then copy/pasted TO http://spiritualecology.org/about-spiritual-ecology.--FunkyWagon23 23:10, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: In that case can you please point out the attribution sentence on the web-site acknowledging the source as required by the Wikimedia foundation. If you can conclusively demonstrate that this is indeed a copy-back and that the material is properly acknowledged on the web-site, then the copyright violation will be removed promptly  Velella  Velella Talk   23:19, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The attribution sentence is available, as well as the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY-SA) and the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) to use the materials found at http://spiritualecology.org/about-spiritual-ecology  -- visible at the link . As per your message, please remove the copyright violation promptly. Thanks.--Gsc se (talk) 18:23, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Removing POV notice: copyright issue has been addressed. And a section of "Opposing Views" has been added to the page. Also as per POV#When_to_remove, conditions have been met: no specific explanation has been given for the neutrality issue, and the discussion has become dormant.Stormlion67 (talk) 21:11, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Copy/pasted from website

message: Angus Guilherme¶ 02:19, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  OTRS 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Spiritual ecology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Replaced archive link http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:TMxMH6IBbBIJ:www.eoearth.org/view/article/155698/+&cd=9&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us with https://web.archive.org/web/20160425003418/http://www.eoearth.org/view/article/155698/ on http://www.eoearth.org/view/article/155698/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:54, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This article seems to be almost entirely a personal essay and WP:OR. it seems the editors are taking the idea of Spiritual Ecology and are searching for sources that sound a bit like SE and are adding them. To not violate WP:OR, the source needs to specially mention Spiritual Ecology. Finding a source that mentions ecology and some religious sentiment is not enough. Ashmoo (talk) 13:55, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original research in article