Talk:Civilization Revolution

message: The DS version has downloadable scenarioes as well from Nintendo WFC. I don't have a source for this, but I do have a copy of the game that confirms this is possible. 194.255.6.230 (talk) 21:10, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  DS version 

message: The old mess is archived. This is going to be a nice, civil discussion of this article now, right? JAF1970 18:28, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reboot

message: GameSpy preview - add information as needed to article. JAF1970 17:36, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: New information

message: There is no colon in the title. It's "Civilization Revolution", not "Civilization: Revolution". JAF1970 17:37, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: No colon

message: "Sid Meier's Civilization Revolution" is NOT the official title. JAF1970 22:21, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: No preface

message: there is sth wrong with wii release part
but it's coming out.
Xelas211 (talk) 00:26, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  wii 

message: I hope this game lives up to the name, can't wait. So does anyone know its like splitscreen multiplayer or is it only online?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.99.92.88 (talk) 06:09, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Hey

message: russia is in. arab is also in. idon't think peria is inXelas211 (talk) 19:01, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: where is proof of perisa67.80.30.201 (talk) 22:56, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Need citations, please. JAF1970 (talk) 23:01, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  civs 

message: Is there any confirmation of the presence (or lack thereof) of a single player random map mode? I've heard some rumors and concerns that there won't be.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.154.204.34 (talk) 02:22, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: i've played the game. civrev always genrate random maps and you have no options like in civ 4 (conitinents, islands, map size, temperature, number of other civilications...) --217.7.154.69 (talk) 11:06, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Single Player Random Map

message: Civilization_V redirects to Civilization_Revolution, however looking at the context and title of this game isn't that technically wrong? I think of Revolution as a branch in a different direction, not a follow-up game. Civilization V(If they're ever going to make it) will most likely follow in the same footsteps of Civilization IV/III/II/I. I propose we remove the redirection or specify that this is not the fifth installment of this game. Any thoughts or am I just being anal here?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.208.145.59 (talk) 10:36, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed with 84.208.145.59. Civilization V, Civ V, Civilization 5, and Civ 5 pages should all either redirect to a page of Civilization in general or be deleted. Jon (talk) 17:42, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Civilization V(5) 

message: Will there really be no PC version or is this just a branch-out version (not Civilization V)? --89.142.138.168 (talk) 09:09, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That's correct, no PC version planned at this time. (And pretty unlikely unless console game controllers ever become popular for PCs.) Civ Revolution is using something seldom seen on PC games but quite common on console games, which is an indepedent flying camara sepreate from the main select/movement controler. One of the mini-joysticks on the console controller controls the camara and the other selection/movement. Jon (talk) 17:48, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, console game controllers are prevelant on the PC (Xbox 360 controllers, Logitech gamepads), but no PC version (yet). And this is not a forum. JAF1970 (talk) 18:04, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  PC Version 

message: Okay, met with Sid today, chatted, have been playing Civ Rev the last 2 days, will be posting a preview of the game, so someone is going to have to post my preview. A lot of gameplay stuff, ie. the first to get a tech gets a free unit or building based on it. (ie. 1st to Pottery, get a free granary. 1st to Iron, get a free Legion unit.) JAF1970 (talk) 19:31, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Posted three facts for the article in my preview. The freebie for being the first to reaching a tech, and 3 units = 1 army.  Winning the game is a simple affair: either earn a set amount of gold, wipe out the other civs capitals, build the United Nations wonder (after earning 20 Great People/wonders/flipped cities), or, of course, launch a spaceship to Alpha Centauri. JAF1970 (talk) 03:31, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: ComicCon

message: Please don't change the cover without good reason. JAF1970 (talk) 14:27, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Box

message: Perhaps a year ago, I would've agreed to promote this to start class. Unfortunately, Wikipedia has been undergoing a huge revision with its style policies, and this article no longer passes. First and foremost, the prose isn't that great. For example, who's Sid Meier? 
Gameplay is really short, and all those random sections underneath should be given a level three header. This article lacks a development section, and the Reception section needs .
Organization is horrible. The Wii thing at the end should become a level three header to the hypothetical "Development" section. Finally, the cites need to be formatted with . Also, I notice that the gameplay section has no cites at all, and the Reception section is seriously lacking. Oh, and per MoS, refs should go after commas, not before. 
I think you'd have better off requesting an assessment for Civilization (series).--haha169 (talk) 01:46, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: Do you think it would be a relevant topic to list all of the Great People and Wonders in here?  
Fortenium (talk) 03:53, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  People and Wonders 

message: I removed the following for lack of citations:
:Currently, many users are experiencing difficulties with the multiplayer functionality of the game, with many players stating multiplayer to be nonexistent. This is due to a lack of support from the parent company as well as many gamers simply giving up on trying to connect with each other. A new patch was released in late October but it has failed to correct many issues pointed out by gamers, as well as allowing new problems to appear which has further aggravated the gaming community. These issues are mostly specific to the PS3 version of the game. A new version, 1.40, is expected soon although no formal announcements have been made.
Other than the truth of this information being unsupported, not having sources also means we can't investigate whether or not this information is out of date. - Rainwarrior (talk) 01:04, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multiplayer problems 

message: Junior's first turn-based strategy. 96.243.177.81 (talk) 06:42, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commentary 

message: the picture of the gameplay is for the PS3.  this is a picture of the xbox 360 version and as you can see the borders are straight lines as opposed to the ripples in the PS3 borders.
--Krasilschic (talk) 16:21, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gameplay picture 

message: the article doesn't mention relics. also, should civfanatic be referenced.
Canvashat (talk) 15:52, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: relics

message: This is being discussed in the Civ:V article and likely to have ramifications for this previous incarnation's article too. Rather than tread the same ground over please join the debate; Talk:Civilization_V#Removal_of_tables_of_Civilizations to see if we can't reach a consensus.Flygongengar (talk) 01:47, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing Civ Tables/Trivial Lists 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Civilization Revolution. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090813125716/http://wireless.ign.com/articles/101/1012453p1.html to http://wireless.ign.com/articles/101/1012453p1.html
*Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/65plfRb6j?url=http://kotaku.com/278636/why-the-psp-gets-no-civ-revolution?tag=gamingshortstraw to http://kotaku.com/gaming/short-straw/why-the-psp-gets-no-civ-revolution-278636.php
*Added  tag to http://www.1up.com/do/newsStory?cId=3175940
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080320142818/http://www.xbox.com/en-US/games/s/sidmeierscivilizationrevolution/ to http://www.xbox.com/en-US/games/s/sidmeierscivilizationrevolution/
*Added  tag to http://www.1up.com/do/newsStory?cId=3165952
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120620113334/http://wp7lab.com/news/civilization-revolution-available-on-windows-phone/ to http://wp7lab.com/news/civilization-revolution-available-on-windows-phone/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:17, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018)