lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Pringles

message: In 2020, the pringles got new logo, but in europe it still uses the old logo in 2021, so shouldnt then there be showed both logos ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by T0biasCZe (talk • contribs) 17:18, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo 

message: Remove reference that failed verification. 2601:246:CA01:31C0:349F:F7A2:E9:C1F1 (talk) 18:54, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 21:24, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 4 September 2021 

message: Some people think that Pringles originally intended to make tennis balls. Wolf O'Donnel (talk) 18:58, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tennis Balls 

message: The history section currently uses the name Mark Pringle for the inventor of US Patent 2286644. However, the cited source gives his sort name as "Mark, Pringle" next to "Lame, Herman F.", which would make the former's real name Pringle Mark. Most hits I get for "Mark Pringle" online are either from Wikipedia or about other people with the name, so can someone help verify what his real name was? Glades12 (talk) 14:54, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind, the patent itself clearly gives their names as "M. Pringle" and "Herman F. Lame" respectively. Turns out the online abstract was wrong. Glades12 (talk) 15:00, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mark Pringle or Pringle Mark? 

message: At some point, Pringles in the UK *possibly* used to market "Sour Cream and Chive" flavour.  Weirdly the actual evidence for this seems to be scant and honestly all I could turn up was a bunch of r/casualuk threads started by people who (like myself) vehemently insist that this did exist at one time and has been replaced by "Sour Cream and Onion".  And this is regardless of whether the flavours were actually different.  Anyone have any definitive sources either way? 84.92.44.244 (talk) 12:56, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sour cream and chive 

message: //. // IS FAIR I NOT SURE?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:B747:48:344:5995:609E:3217:1DB3 (talk) 16:54, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: why this a lock,, I can edit too

message: There is speculation as to whether they originally meant to market tennis balls, but were shipped potatoes instead. Can anyone find evidence to verify this? Wolf O'Donnel (talk) 09:07, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tennis
Talk:West Flanders

message: Can someone verify the flag? I thought the West-Flemish flag was the “Oude Vlaenderen” (the currently displayed flag with the red shield on a blue field with yellow sun-rays) on the left side, and the Flemish Lion next to it on the right side.
(Here I use left as left side to the viewer = side to the flagpole, rather than the right side to the viewer as in heraldry)
As far as i know, the version with the lion is the one used in belgian context, with the lion being crowned.  The lion depicts Flanders, and the crown its loyalty to belgium I THINK. 06:16, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flag 

message: This page calls these areas 'districts' (or, initially 'administrative districts'). But wouldn't it be better to call them 'arrondissements', to correlate with Arrondissements of Belgium and all the pages in :Category:Arrondissements of Belgium. --David Edgar 18:19, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Districts or Arrondissements?

message: The map with the Judicial arrondissements doesn't seem to add up. Not all of West Flanders is covered, the region to the North-East of Kortrijk does not seem to belong to any judicial arrondissement. I assume it belongs to Kortrijk? It's close to Ghent as well but I don't think arrondissements can cut across provinces.--Lamadude (talk) 15:08, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Judicial Arrondissements
Talk:Deconstructionism

message: The article contains no reliable sources for that meaning of deconstructionism. All articles in Wikipedia must be verifiable. Also, this article reads like a dictionary definition and Wikipedia is not a dictionary - can you find any reliable sources to show that an act of someone sabotaging something in society has been known as deconstructionism? If not it should just be a redirect to the deconstruction article. Graham87 09:14, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You seem to be referring to Societal collapse. I wouldn't object to this article being a redirect to deconstruction with a hatnote linking to Societal collapse. I don't think this article should exist in its own right though. Graham87 09:41, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: This article should be a hard redirect
Talk:Convention for the Suppression of the Traffic in Persons and of the Exploitation of the Prostitution of Others

message: Large parts of this article are completely lacking in citations, and there are statements made that this Convention calls for things that are not described in the language of the treaty. I have already removed a statement to the effect that the Convention calls for suppression of the pornography industry when in fact there is no language whatsoever about pornography in the text of the convention. There seems to be quite a few other things in this article that are similarly not supported by the text of the document. Iamcuriousblue (talk) 23:48, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Factual Accuracy & Verification Tags 
Talk:Ben Curtis (golfer)

message: Clarify--only men to do what? Win the championship? I doubt it. Win it in those years--certainly not. Vicki Rosenzweig 22:34 23 Jul 2003 (UTC)
*Sorry, Vicki--I'll clarify.  Only men to win it in consecutive years.  I thought it read wrong when I wrote it, but couldn't figure out what. Thanks for catching it. Jwrosenzweig 22:44 23 Jul 2003 (UTC)
Shouldn't this article be split into two articles, Ben Curtis(golfer) and Ben Curtis(actor)?
That's why there's this header at the top: "For the Dell advertising character, see Ben Curtis (actor)" --Tarpy 15:44, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of Polish painters

message: * Jan Matejko
* Jan Berdyszak
* Henryka Beyer
* Bożena Biskupska
* Anna Bilińska-Bohdanowiczowa
* Izaak van den Blocke
* Agata Bogacka
* Jan Borowczak  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.32.35.134 (talk) 19:29, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Requests
Talk:Lorentz force

message: I'm about to revert myself, and work out my confusion before next saving another revision, that should actually be better than what i found. (I'm about 50 years rusty on this, and i'd better sharing my misgivings about what i found, later in this section, before saving the fix that had seemed just around the corner.)--Jerzy•t 05:58, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Presumably temporary problems 

message: If the Lorentz force takes the form
:\mathbf{F} = q\mathbf{E} + q\mathbf{v} \times \mathbf{B}
for an isolated particle, then in a material medium it should take the form
:\mathbf{f} = \rho \mathbf{E} + \mathbf{J} \times \mathbf{B}
where: f is the density of force; ρ is the density of total charge; and J is the density of total current.
What if we then separate the total charge and current into their free and bound parts?
From the article on Polarization density, we have
:\rho = \rho_f - \nabla \cdot \mathbf P
where: ρf is the density of free charge; and P is the polarization density. And we also have
:\mathbf{J} = \mathbf{J}_f + \nabla\times\mathbf{M} + \frac{\partial\mathbf{P}}{\partial t}
where: Jf is the density of free current; and M is the density of magnetization.
If we put these together, we get
:\mathbf{f} = (\rho_f - \nabla \cdot \mathbf P) \mathbf{E} + (\mathbf{J}_f + \nabla\times\mathbf{M} + \frac{\partial\mathbf{P}}{\partial t}) \times \mathbf{B}.
Should this not be in the article? JRSpriggs (talk) 21:02, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Polarization and magnetization 

message: A mnemonic for remembering the direction of the force resulting from ev x B is Seven Up. Imagine yourself on the particle going through the magnetic field forwards into the screen, that is the direction of 'V'. If the direction of B is 'S'outh <--- 'N'orth (i.e. right to left - magnetic field lines point north to south), the force is uP for a Positive particle (the same as for a conventional current) and dowN for a Negative particle. This spells out SVN (seven) and uP/dowN. The v in the middle represents the fact that the particle is moving through the magnetic field (S<-N). I think this is more memorable than all the rules with hands (right or left? which finger for which thing?) Acorrector (talk) 17:07, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Force on a current-carrying wire - SeVeN uP rule
Talk:Specific impulse

message: Nasa is working on an impulse engine based on the Mach effect (which has no Wikipedia page; the Mach effect page is about something else). This engine is driven by gravity, so it doesn't need to expel propellant. Yet it's still described as having a "specific impulse", which makes no sense if specific impulse is something that specifically applies to propellant, as the Wikipedia entry seems to imply. The article needs to explain specific impulse in a way that can be understood as it applies to engines like the one NASA is working on.
:
:Seems to me that you have to see what WP:RS say, but I suspect you could do it based on energy instead of mass or weight. Gah4 (talk) 19:56, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Specific impulse" of engines with no propellant
Talk:Prime meridian

message: The "List of historic prime meridians on Earth" gives the "Fortunate Isles / Azores" as 25° 40' 32″ W, but the map accompanying it shows the 32nd meridian west. This started with Revision as of 03:10, 23 February 2021. Should the map be brought into line with the text? Alekksandr (talk) 20:54, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks to me like it was a mistake.  Feel free to correct it. --Lasunncty (talk) 22:50, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Azores
Talk:Clam soup

message: This may be an ignorant question, but the article doesn't even hint at it. There are several soups with clams that still have their shells, or at least where the shells are included (and the flesh perhaps removed and put back? I believe that happens with snails?)
Do the shells impart flavor perhaps, or is it just for show? I assume they're discarded while eating, though stranger things are eaten...--194.112.128.196 (talk) 11:37, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  What happens to the shells?
Talk:Oliver Otis Howard

message: These nightly "fixes" are getting a little annoying.  Some things can be gotten from context - I find it doubtful that any of Cromwell's old soldiers went on to go out West and fight the Nez Perce. Hephaestos 05:07 24 Jul 2003 (UTC)
and you americans complain about terrorists when your own people  executed terrorism on a larger scale and killed more women and children!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.31.3.195 (talk) 16:49, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: fixes

message: Why is there no mention of Howard and Tom Jeffords' dealings and 1872 treaty with Cochise? — TAnthonyTalk 18:34, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Cochise

message: I am not a wikipedia contributor, but I thought this info might be an addition to this page on Oliver Otis Howard.  Apparently he was a first cousin to Frances Perkins' grandmother, thus making him a third cousin to Frances herself.    Elisabeth L. Daley  eldaley@gmail.com  info is from https://francesperkinscenter.org/life-new/  98.118.61.234 (talk) 17:10, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  3rd cousin to Frances Perkins
Talk:Grid network

message: I disagree with the description of the Grid Network presented in this wiki. It does not cover any aspect of the Grid and the networking needs of it. (Comment by  copied from the article) Fred Talk 16:44, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I would concur with that characterization. Serious rewriting is needed. Kbrose (talk) 18:25, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Grid computing in common language today has changed. It has multiple meanings and continues to change. High Performance computing now interconnects with multidimensional or torus networks interconnections no longer analogous to a two D grid. Grid networks still exist inside semiconductors with many core because of the 2D nature of the chip nearest neighbor connectivity is constricted. 
Grid Computing according to the national science foundation publication is probably the best understood description. 
The Grid 2: Blueprint for a New Computing Infrastructure.
Scottprovost (talk) 15:28, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Enigma

message: What is the significe of "enigma" in WII, or am I spelling it wrong —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.33.155.101 (talk) 15:49, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: See ULTRA. A common evaluation in books on the subject is that the decryption of messages from the Enigma machine, and other high-grade cipher systems, hastened the defeat of Germany by a couple of years or so. — Matt Crypto 16:25, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: What Is

message: Moved from Enigma
Enigma is also a song performed by the band "Ages of Man". It was composed November of 2007.
--74.13.60.237 (talk) 12:28, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved from [[Enigma]]

message: A computerised algorithm has generated a version of this page using data obtained from AlgaeBase.  You may be able to incorporate elements into the current article. Alternatively, it may be appropriate to create a new page at Enigma (alga). Anybot (contact operator) 16:04, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Bot-generated content

message: Tagged becuase of Disorganized categories. Multiple spellings and forms. Multiple redlinks. The redlinks remaining are OK, but I haven't dealt with the other issues. Boleyn (talk) 07:59, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean-up

message: In a book I read a few years ago that discussed obscure origins of words we use today, "enigma" was explained to originate from the name of a then mysterious tooth disease found in dogs that we now have the cure for. It didn't mention penicillin in there, since it wasn't invented at the time, but I thought I'd add that for modern readers. It also mentions that although enigma's meaning has changed somewhat, the "mystery" part remains although it has long lost the meaning of a tooth disease in dogs (and it only had that meaning for roughly 300 years). However, it also mentions stuff like "rule of thumb" referring to how wide of an object you can beat your wife with, "garbage" originally being a Norman French derrived word for offal from birds, explaining why beef and pork are names for the flesh but the animals are still called cows and pigs, and so on. I can understand if you want to remove the additional usage, because it's not cited, but I will look for that book and attempt to cite it for all of you. MVillani1985 (talk) 02:42, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Tooth Disease Entry

message: Checking out the history I found a removed entry, it was discussing a game/travel thing hosted in Warsaw, Poland.  But, it looks like it might be put on by a company.  And I'm not sure if linking it is just advertising?  They have a website (which doesn't display for me), but some details can be found in this xml file: 
~ender 2012-02-25 11:46:AM MST
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.165.52.42 (talk • contribs) 18:47, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed entry
Talk:Realm (disambiguation)

message: I wonder, mostly out of pure curiousity, and not neccessarily in a wish to make wikipedia into a dictionary... I wonder, if realm can be said to rather have the meaning "the lands and people of a kingdom" rather than the governal and judicial aspects?
-- Ruhrjung 08:55 24 Jul 2003 (UTC)
----
Shouldn't definations of words be in wikitionary? Falcon 16:41, Mar 21, 2004 (UTC)
Maybe you're right. Let's put  on it!
--Ruhrjung 15:31, 22 Mar 2004 (UTC)

message: just give the article some time so it can develop. actually, where do you put the line between wikipedia articles and wiktionary articles? someone added the information about the java thing on the realm article - i don't think that this would be in place in the wiktionary - thus leave the article as it is. --Abdull 10:41, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  give it time 

message: Realm is an old term still used as an alternative word for kingdom, the current opening sentence, with kingdom pipe-tricked to Monarchy, is very contorted. And the pipe-trick isnt very satisfactory in other articles either (eg Englis). While Kingdom is a disambig page, as now, there is a need, it seems to me, for an article called Kingdom (realm). (Realm could then be merged into the new article.) Laurel Bush 12:45, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contorted opening sentence 

message: I've added the computer hacker definition -- is it time now for a disambiguation on this page? Grimhim 00:33, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation
Talk:John Abercrombie (physician)

message: John Abercrombie, the Jazz Guitarist, is not an historical figure who died more than a century ago. Please fix this link to not point to the other person of the same name.
:I'll create an entry for the musician. He's certainly a major figure in jazz, and deserves an entry. Several of the pages linking to the current entry are referencing the musician. Moreover, Google yields far more results for the musician than for the physician. I'll probably move the physician's entry to a separate page.
:But in the meantime, what's with the note about borrowing text? Is this permissible? It seems to me that it wouldn't be -- and in that case, the Scottish physician's entry needs to be rewritten entirely, or deleted. Cribcage 01:05, 6 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Killing field

message: I think we need some citations on this term being used in modern warfare.  Machine gunners do not use the term "killing field" rather they use beaten zone for where the rounds impact.  So in light of this, I'm redirecting the redirect to the disambig page.  24.45.14.255 01:42, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This may be bunk. 

message: The term 'beaten zone' and 'danger space' are more appropriate in modern warfare. 
Also, there needs to be some citations for the use of the term, both in modern warfare and ancient warfare.  Rhetth 01:50, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reason to not use killing field term..
Talk:Delusion

message: The formatting on the types of delusions seems to split between two different styles: listing general descriptions of delusions and giving specific insight into delusions. I am new to Wikipedia editing, so I am avoiding changing anything that requires a higher levels of understanding to inform the general public. However, if anyone of better qualification sees this, I would recommend deleting the general listings and instead furthering the number of delusions with in-depth research. LightningKing72 (talk) 19:26, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I am also confused about types of delusions, that is mentioned here. When I go into the references, it says something else; it says what is mentioned in DSM V instead, in diagnose F22 2001:2020:305:A8BC:51DF:4A79:4F88:845F (talk) 07:07, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing Formatting 

message: The listed descriptive characteristics of "Delusion" might well reasonably apply to the phenomenon of people experiencing transgender ideation or tendencies.  Is there any non-political reason these two conditions should not be linked for cross-reference?
Yes, it's a third-rail concept, but intellectual honesty often flies in the face of personal comfort. 71.197.121.170 (talk) 23:37, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, there is. We have no reliable sources connecting the two. Read WP:OR and do not try to insert your own opinions into Wikipedia articles. --Hob Gadling (talk) 08:29, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

text: Oh, and before you ask: Right-wing wackjobs such as Republican politicians and the Murdoch Empire do not count as reliable sources. --Hob Gadling (talk) 08:55, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transgender
Talk:Wave period

message: Does this page really need to exist? All it says is that period is the inverse of frequency, which is already stated in the period article. The rest of the article is a list of formulas like "period = 1 / frequency" and "frequency = 1 / period" which are the same formula restated and can be found in the reciprocal article, talk about some SI units (Hertz and seconds), and another list of formulas like "wavelength / time = velocity" that are restated 6 times. Seems like a pointless article to me. Opinions? HN 22:10 24 Jul 2003 (UTC)
:It is fairly light, content-wise.  Conceiveably it could be revised to change that, but I'm not up to it today. Michael Hardy 22:13 24 Jul 2003 (UTC)
::I agree with HN.  It should be merged into Frequency.  Also, as an electronics engineer, I've never actually heard the term 'wave period', it's always just 'period'.  If this is a term specific to ocean surface waves, it should be so stated.  --ChetvornoTALK 21:44, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Added merger proposal tag --ChetvornoTALK 22:31, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with the proposed merge into Frequency. I also notified the merge proposal on Wikipedia:Proposed_mergers. Kraaiennest (talk) 18:06, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

text: I disagree with the merger.  Studying wave forms and energy in a coastal geomporhology sense, listing wave period separately helps people looking for information in the context of coastal geomorphology.  If it is joined into its physics roots, it becomes harder to find.  Wikipeadia is so good because it aligns information with disciplines, and coastal geomorphology is its own discipline.  Pushing things into master disciplines is going to water down the strength of Wikipedia. (I hope I have done this right) Peter Drescher (talk) 02:32, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

text: I've made a lot of changes.  I hope it doesn't tick anyone off, but there was a ton of redundancy in the article as it was.  dave 04:40 25 Jul 2003 (UTC)
----
How about this lot for ocean waves if tidied up and equations sorted out?: Subsea (talk) 17:22, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge this article?
Talk:The Last Messiah

message: Well, it is a stub already.  We don't want two identical stubs Den sidste Messias and The Last Messiah. Wshun
The link for "anchoring" is a page describing a markedly different concept (also called anchoring).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:6582:8580:C00:13C:6E80:2890:4354 (talk) 23:14, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I added a bunch to the article. I have The Philosophy Now link with The Last Messiah as the main source because I am sure that it would be preferred to wikia (even though the text is the same). The Philosophy Now translation is the only non-personal translation of it that I am aware of. If the fact that it requires a subscription is an overriding problem, someone can change it to the wikia source. Candidesgarden (talk) 05:22, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Additions