Talk:Fate/stay night/Archive 3

message: I know it's a really big spoiler to mention who is a master, but I was thinking that the section might look better if it was seperated into "Master" and "Servant" categories rather than "Main Characters" and "Minor Characters."  If you think this is too much of a spoiler to seperate like that, please let me know.  I won't touch anything until someone gives me thumbs up. Mirioki 5:17, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Broken into Main characters, Secondary characters, and Minor characters, as there are some people out there who fit neither, and some minor characters get more screen time than some Servants.--み使い Mitsukai 15:14, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  there are also those who are in both categories Shinigami Josh 04:35, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  why is shinji in the "main character" section and sakura in the "supporting character" section? it doesn't make sense unless this article is entirely dedicated to the anime and not the fate story/universe as a whole Ricerocket 01:28, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Masters and Servants

message: What is this?  --Raijinili 22:15, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: PS2 version of F/sn.  Comes out on December 29th.  No h.  Fully voiced. Moogy (talk) 01:35, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Why isn't the name up on the page? --Raijinili 17:51, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is now. Moogy (talk) 14:08, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Realta Nua?

message: Ive looked at most english sites and even the PS2 website itself, but I didn't find any mention of the game.
According to the article here, it is supposed to be out by 2006.
I haven't been to Japanese language sites so I don't know if they are mention there...
Are they really releasing a game on the PS 2 console? 134.117.166.74 06:33, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. The official website is linked above and here's the amazon.co.jp listing: . -Seventh Holy Scripture 07:06, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, okay thank you very much! Can't read Japanese script but at least I know. 134.117.166.74 19:08, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been delayed to 2007... Moogy (talk) 14:08, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Fate/Stay Night PS2 Release

message: I'm of the impression that Wikipedia doesn't like original research, and frankly much of the stuff here was taken from other Wikipedia articles or the fansites Fuyuki Wiki + The Moonlit World. How exactly do we cite our sources with fansites? I originally had citations for Archer in that manner for Fuyuki Wiki but then I was told by a fellow editor that's not permitted, so I'm not sure what to do. For now, I've just left an external links section at the bottom of certain pages with pertinent information related to what is brought up in the articles. Typically, The Moonlit World works for character biographies and Fuyuki Wiki for specific game parameters. Terek 04:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Many things probably cannot be cited accurately in accordance with Wikipedia's rules.  You and I both know that The Moonlit World and Fuyuki are accurate, but there's nothing to corroborate them for Wikipedia, unfortunately... Unless, of course, you could actually find the magazine articles/fanbook passages that they translate, and reference them instead.  I believe that referencing the information with the original Japanese text by Nasu would work.  Perhaps I'll try to find some of the original material later...  In the meantime, I've been adding references that are covered by TYPE-MOON's official sites, such as release dates and such.  Oh yes, another nice thing to have would be a citation for F/sn's sales numbers/popularity... I'll work on finding that, as well. Moogy (talk) 14:08, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Citing Sources

message: :How do I add extra tables to certain sections? Terek 06:46, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nevermind, I think I've got it. Terek 08:25, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional Tables

message: ::I noticed other articles are mentioning specific episodes in anime where something was introduced; while this would be difficult to accomplish for the game-related FSN material (because this article is oriented primarily toward the game), should we do this on the main and subpages? Terek 23:38, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, the F/sn game is divided into days.  I believe there are 15 days in each path, but don't quote me on that.  You could probably say something like "Fate route, day 7," if you wanted to reference like that.  Or hell, use an anime episode. Moogy (talk) 00:49, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode Citations 

message: ::On an additional note, I feel we should start adding abilities sections for Servants, but they need to differ from the Noble Phantasm format since we can't put up images to condense the paragraphs of the descriptions, such that they look like poorly-constructed sentences stretched across a screen. My proposal is to include ranking specifics in the table information, but elaborate in paragraph form in the abilities section akin to what we have for Rin and Shirou. I'll write one up for Archer when I get home. Terek 23:42, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Alright, all; I've finished the abilities section for Archer, and I'm proud to say that's the first *completed* article for the Servants. I'd ask all of you to follow that model for the other ones as well; I listed all the Servant attributes in the status tables, while elaborating in the abilities section. "role" describes what said Servants did in Fate/stay night, while true identity is their history. I think I'll be working on Gilgamesh next; what I really regret from not doing earlier this year was finishing Lancer and Berserker's biographies, since I did a ton of research and its all gone to waste since I deleted everything (hah). Terek 04:25, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Abilities Sections for Servants

message: I've got the FSN anime music track and I want to include that info on Wikipedia, but I'm not sure about how I should go around doing that. Suggestions? Terek 06:08, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You could try to create an article about the album as such articles like Kanon soundtracks, Higurashi no Naku Koro ni soundtracks or Ouran High School Host Club soundtracks to name a few. Just make sure you include the proper infobox for the album.--(十八|talk) 06:36, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Music Track Listing

message: ::We've got two genre criteria on the main infobox; one lists the elements of FSN's plot, that is, action/fantasy/seinen/drama, and the other what type of game FSN is, that is, visual novel/eroge. How do I change the name of the second "genre" to "type"? Terek 06:18, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Genre

message: In recognition of the hard work by Juhachi and others, I've nom'd this article for GA status here. Moogy (talk) 23:18, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA candidate

message: So what exactly is a good article? A good article usually has the following attributes:
1. It is well written. This article is definitely well-written. I wouldn't necessarily call it brilliant, but there is really nothing that definitely needs to be changed. However, the lead section needs to be rewritten. It says almost nothing about what the game is about. Please summarize the most important points of the article as stated in WP:LEAD.
2. It is factually accurate and verifiable. I don't doubt that it is. Since a lot of the article deals with story and characters, could you add the actual game to the references section? That way a bunch more of the article would be sourced. The sales and popularity sourcing is done well. I can't find any original research in the article. Good job.
3. It is broad in its coverage. All aspects of the game are covered well here, from reception to adaptations. Nice.
4. It follows the neutral point of view policy. All points of view are presented here without being asserted. No instances of "Fate/stay night is the best thing ever!" or stuff like that.
5. It is stable. This article is stable.
6. It contains images where useful. The way this article uses images is good; the significant characters most definitely do need those illustrations. All of them are covered in fair use, as far as I can tell.
The article length is good. All the stuff that could be split into other articles has been split into other articles.
Just address the lead section issues and I think this could make GA status. Voretus/talk 00:00, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The lead has been edited and is more concise. Does the lead need more work? --Squilibob 07:50, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's looking a lot better. :) Once the minimum two days expires it'll probably work out. Voretus/talk 03:43, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Good article on hold

message: Now that the lead is so much better, I am proud to promote Fate/stay night to good article status. The criteria have all been met very well. Keep up the good work, everyone. If you want to improve the article more, try expanding sections pertaining to the cultural influence of the game. Thanks. Voretus/talk 18:44, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Good article

message: The Plot section needs to be more clearly defined. Isn't this just everything that's stated in the prologue? It's not really a "plot" per say. Also, it needs to be mentioned somewhere how the game has 40 different endings. Creating a gameplay section would be nice.--SeizureDog 22:07, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'll do somethinig about it after I fiddle with the formatting; the article's been quite a mess since I last came about. And will SOMEONE please add abilities sections for all Servants not named Archer? I'll fill in the gaps but just get some stuff started already; doing the research for Lancer and Berserker's biographies is outrageously tedious. Terek 22:16, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Looked a bit into it, but I would disagree; the "plot" of the story is simply a battle between seven Masters and Servants for the Holy Grail; Shirou's own sub-plot varies from story to story, but the overall format of the scenarios is the same; all Servants get killed, the Holy Grail gets destroyed. Terek 22:33, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot section

message: ::Dear folks, please go out and locate the katakana for the various names on this website so that we can "fill in the blanks" for the name-titles. As of right now, I've got my hands tied with other projects and I cannot do the work, but it shouldn't be that difficult (?) if you have the original game and can highlight the text from, although I am not sure if that is possible. Terek 22:53, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Go Fetch

message: ::There should not be spoilers on the main page, or at least the spoilers should be minimum. Granted, we already have some spoilers, namely, listing Shinji as Rider's Master and Gilgamesh's true name, but those are relatively minor in comparison to other stuff like mentioning Tohsaka as Gilgamesh's original Master or Assassin's status as Caster's Servant.
::As such, for the "opening" text of all Servant pages, merely use the paragraph on the main page in place of any different versions that might be spoiler-ish, followed up with a spoiler tag and then the information/abilities/Noble Phantasm/biography section. Terek 22:58, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spoilers in the overview text 

message: The Kobe article mentions that "Fate/stay night" takes place in Kobe though it is called Fuyuki City in the game/anime.  However, this article doesn't mention such a thing, and I'm having a hard time finding citation for this claim.  Is this true?  If so, is there an English language site that mentions such? -- Exitmoose 03:30, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There are no citations for Fate/stay night taking place in Kobe because it takes place in Fuyuki City. Please see these Google results, too! Voretus 17:58, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, it seemed unlikely. I would have removed it on the spot, but I'm not familiar with the anime.  Thanks for your help! -- Exitmoose 00:00, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

text: Someone might have noticed a simmilarity between landmarks in Kobe and those seen in Fuyuki City; I believe something simmilar applies to the Suzumiya Haruhi series. Unless there's a website detailling comparisons (unlikely), removing the line item in question is probably the best course of action. 71.9.137.37 02:53, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fuyuki City is Kobe?

message: Should there be a spoiler tag in this article? I wouldn't know myself since I haven't watched the anime or played the game yet, hence why I'm worried I'm about to spoil the entire story for myself by reading the article... I was just surprised when I didn't see one, since there's spoiler warnings in almost all articles like this.
:Spoiler tags aren't mandatory. I personally think that articles look better without them. I suppose that's why there aren't any. Voretus 20:11, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: We've kept all the juicy stuff off of the main-page; you would potentially be at more risk searching for Servant identities on Google. 71.9.137.37 04:19, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Spoiler Tag?

message: I’ve -finally- decided to get to work on (a) terminology page(s) for TYPE-MOON-related concepts, elements, artefacts and all other sort of stuff that is far too extensive to stick anywhere else. However, before opening that can of radioactive flesh-eating worms, we seriously need to agree on what terminology to use for all the translated stuff once and for all.
My idea is to create several pages for Spell-related stuff, artefact/weapon-related, organizations/groups, Creature-related and a Concept page for everything else. Feel free to accuse me of ripping off Arai on that, I won’t fight it, but it really does seem like the most logical organization. This is all far in the future anyway, the only thing I’ll be doing anytime soon is the spell-related page, which coincidentally is the one that requires standardization the most. Of course, if there is any problem at all with that idea, feel free to say so.
Have in mind that there are no official translations for any of this stuff, so choosing the most suitable terminology is our responsibility. Whatever we choose is not meant to become standard in all of the TYPE-MOON fan community, and in reverse, what is common in the community does not necessarily HAVE to decide what we choose. Especially since there isn’t one clearly predominant usage, which is exactly the problem to begin with. 
To keep things in only one place and not make everything cluttered, I fleshed out the whole issue in my discussion page. Once a decision is reached (and this is my wishful thinking begging for more than two people to actually pay attention to this), we could paste the whole thing into the newly created page for future reference.
Anyway, go here and tell me what you think. Ephyon 23:05, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Important: Consensus Needed

message: I've opened a discussion on Wikipedia talk:Copyrights. To put it briefly, my position is that we should refrain from linking to blatant copyright violations, but that pursuing the copyright status of questionable or marginal off-site links - which we aren't even responsible for the content of - is a waste of Wikipedians' time and effort that could better be spent elsewhere. We are not responsible for policing the entire Web, or even endorsing the content of every single external link in every article on Wikipedia. *** Crotalus *** 23:17, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: By putting links there we are endorsing them, and your attempts to rewrite the copyright policy to impose your contempt for the law have been reverted. Please do not try to recruit people from this talk page, especially when you know that they lack any real knowledge of copyright law and are only pissed off at their link to pirated material was taken down. This is a bad faith attempt to try to overturn policy by sheer mob tactics, and it won't work. DreamGuy 05:26, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: To the contrary, DreamGuy, we're not "pissed because 'our' link got taken down", nor was I pissed at all until right now when you started flinging about nonsensical accusations of bad faith. May I humbly suggest you tone down the self righteousness 5 or 6 notches and keep a civil tongue in your head? --tjstrf talk 05:59, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not nonsensical. Crotalus above tried to modify the Wikipedia:Copyright page to reflect his own views and suggest that everyone who disagreed with him is just wasting their time, and he is here clearly trying to encourage people to go over to the other page and support him even though he was reverted by countless numbers of people, with more waiting in the wings to revert should he or anyone try to put that nonsense back. If you do go over there to try to cause trouble, then that's a credit to you. The fact that he is trying to recruit people to defend his anti-policy actions doesn't mean any of you are stupid enough to fall for it, but I thought I should point out that his actions are going to get him in trouble, and so that anyone who might be foolish enough to try to go change the policy to encourage copyright violations can get a heads up that he's not getting anywhere with it. Might I suggest you not call things nonsensical unless you know what you are talking about. Oh, but then from the debate above I see that it never stopped you before. So, hey, if you do feel brash enough to go try to change policy, don't say I didn't warn you, as the people here might be open to copyright violations, but obviously on the copyright page itself people who care about it are there at all times.DreamGuy 11:31, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't intend to discuss this issue with you, DreamGuy, until and unless you are willing to comport yourself with the requirements of WP:CIVIL, WP:NPA, and WP:AGF. This is not the first time you have violated these policies, and I don't intend to get into an argument with someone whose discussion style consists of flinging around insults. *** Crotalus *** 20:21, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: ::Terek here, sorry to be brief. I think we should include a section about the locations in Fuyuki City, as well as establish pages for stuff common to all Nasu themes (like, say, "prana") so we can avoid descriptions within the FSN article. I'll devote some time to Arthur/Heracles research in the future to improve the backgrounds of the articles. Cheers, good luck on finals and the lot. 169.237.235.71 21:03, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Additionally, expand on the "Reception" box by noting the following: the impact of FSN on the doujin world, such as the creaton of Fatal/Fake and Battle Moon Wars, the participation of some characters in SaiMoe 2006 and FrenchBread's Notorious Brand. Terek 08:16, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: More Pages

message: User:69.234.104.212 has rather hastily gone ahead and wiped out every Servant status chart in every article so far, I assume under the logic of… actually, I’m not too sure since he/she/it only linked to a pair of policy articles without discussing it. I assume this person believes this information is not relevant enough, or doesn’t mean anything, or something.
That’s not quite right. While http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:NOT#INFO does mention statistics as being not ideal, it clearly states that the articles should contain enough information to make sense of them, because let’s face it, there’s a whole lot of stuff that can’ be done any more efficiently than pasting a good data list like that. Simply saying Berserker is way strong and fast doesn’t quite drive the point home as well as showing a comparison of HOW stronger and faster he is than others. 
There IS a problem though: While the status boxes ARE relevant, someone who doesn’t know anything beforehand won’t understand much. AGI isn’t raw speed, bur overall movement capacity, STR is power + weapon, etc
Why Am I bringing this up instead of fixing it myself? Because I haven’t got time to do it all right now and someone else might take it up. In short, we need a way to explain what each statistic… a good place to put it would be something like an overall description of what a Servant is, which I believe is largely overdue. --Ephyon 15:28, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I propose a section somewhere, likely a data page or something, that explains the significance of terms, concepets, and stats common to the TYPE-MOON universe so there won't be confusion when referring to the stats. It also makes for a convenient page to link to from the table since there's not enough info on certain skills like Archer's Eye of the Mind to warrant it a whole section, which is why I previously omitted putting them in there. One could describe Eye of the Mind in two words - battle experience. Everything else would be fluff and Wikipedia aims to minimize the fluff as much as possible. Sadly, I do not have much time to make edits either, but perhaps we can rally some interest in a data page when Kara no Kyoukai comes rolling around. Terek 07:42, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Status Charts

message: I've cleaned up List of Fate/stay night episodes and nominated it at WP:FLC here. Feel free to express your opinions. Thanks. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 06:14, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: FLC

message: It's not as bad as the character articles, but the plot summary is somewhat over-detailed and has a real in-universe problem.
Also, in my mind, the character sections are largely unneeded - they could be direct links, with possibly a sentence-long description, since they are the same text as the character pages. However, it is important that they mention who the Servant is - Wikipedia isn't supposed to be about preserving spoilers or keeping secrets.
There's a lot of problems with the character articles themselves, but I've left a note about that on the WP:Video Game discussion page, since that was the most applicable project.KrytenKoro 15:10, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Problems with this article

message: We are going to have to update the manga list considering that its past December and we dont know if more volumes are out, and if possible does anyone know where you can read them considering most of the common manga reading sites like onemanga and mangafox dont update Fate anymore Estarrol (talk) 23:31, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Manga

message: Seems like this gets Sorcery and Magic, Sorcerer and Magus mixed up a good bit (TYPE-MOON terminology). Too lazy to fix, someone else do it. Also, shouldn't we use the terminology from the mirror-moon translation, since this is the English page, and that is how most people will have read it (Hero of Justice would be Superhero, etc)
70.58.58.223 (talk) 01:28, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Terminology

message: I think this game definitely belongs in the category :Category:Arthurian games. It is certainly Arthurian in the sense that it involves elements of the Arthurian legend; they are featured in a major way as far as I can tell. The Holy Grail, an intrinsically Arthurian element, seems to be a major plot point (and it did not exist Arthur, though that is a fairly common mistake to make!) Additionally, the character Sabre is a version of King Arthur, and other Arthurianisms appear as well (Mordred, Avalon, Morgan, etc). I don't know much else about this game, but rarely does a week go by that a fan doesn't try to add a mention of it to some Arthurian article or other. The category does not imply the game revolves around Arthur, or else any number of indisputably Arthurian works would be excluded from all such categories, but it certainly involves the legend prominently, and therefore belongs in the category.--Cúchullain t/c 02:37, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The Grail may be tied into Arthurian mythology, but even it's own article states that it began either in Celtic mythology, 12th Century Christian churches, or to promote Communion. Saying that it's a mistake to say it existed before Arthurian legends seems a bit far-fetched. Still, the game only uses pieces from various other sources, and I can't help but notice you're not asking for a Greek Mythology category, or a Christian Religion category. The categories the game has promote the major themes, of which Arthurian works are only a subset. One may as well add things like Time Travel due to Archer. Nezu Chiza (talk) 04:58, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The Grail did not exist before the Arthurian legend, it originated in a 12th century Arthurian romance, and was developed in later Arthurian works, though it potentially evolved from earlier concepts (Celtic or not). Our article on it may need some work if it doesn't convey that. At any rate I didn't mean to pass judgement on that point. My point is, that as the Grail is intrinsically an element of the Arthurian legend, and as it seems to be a major plot point in this game, that qualifies the game as "Arthurian"; there are a number of other Arthurian elements as well. Categories do not promote only the major themes, they are intended to help readers find related information, and I'd argue the game clearly relates to the Arthurian legend in a major way. I would imagine it could also be placed in a category for :Category:Games with featuring elements of Greek mythology if one existed, though I know less about that.--Cúchullain t/c 06:54, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Arthurian?

message: :I recently get hold of an official release of "Character Material" in Chinese, and found some information regarding the production of Fate and how it's link to the Type-Moon's production history etc. Fans who really dig into those information probably know about what I mean by old "Fate" here. (The one with Saber being male and Shiro being female etc.)
:My question here is, are those info allow on this page? It don't really fit in any other pages link to Fate/stay night, and I can see that those info is in both the Chinese and Japanese wiki page due to having official information backing. I know that some film articles on wiki including production history and stuff, so I think it's allow here too.
Also, as many characters loss their articles, are there any attempt to bring those information back into the character list? I mean, that's a lot of information regarding legend and history that is quite important. Japanese wiki just clump them all into one big pages, should it be done here too? Or otherwise?
Hope people care to reply and teach me about how those guide line here work.....
Marlon unknown (talk) 01:53, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Regarding the old "FATE"

message: :I think at this point it should be at least mentioned. With bascially every other translated visual novel the translation is linked in the article(examples, Saya no Uta and Wanko to Kurasou), even with ones that aren't nearly as strict with player owning the original game.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.157.121.189 (talk) 10:10, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: English Translation

message: As mentioned in Talk:Fate/zero, the official website has the date of release as December 29, 2006. A claim that it was released in Comiket prior to official release date is also dubious, since Comiket 2006 started on December 29, 2006. If anyone can prove the December 12, 2006 release date, then cite the source and edit the light novel section accordingly. (and maybe edit Fate/zero as well) Aqua3993 (talk) 22:12, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding Fate/Zero's Release Date 

message: Should i make as separate article for Fate/Prototype ova? The reason i want to do this is because the cast and VAs of Fate/Prototype are different from Fate/stay night. Your thoughts?--FonFon Alseif (talk) 04:34, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think Fate/Prototype should get its own article. It may potentially pass WP:NOTE, but since Prototype is only around 15 minutes long and pretty much share the same development history as Fate/stay night, at least initially, it probably doesn't diverge from Fate/stay night enough to warrant one. The differences can probably be noted in a single paragraph under the anime section. -- クラウド６６８ 05:39, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay then. What about the cast of Fate/Prototype? Their characters are very different from their Fate/stay night counterparts including their voice actors. So where should i put them?--FonFon Alseif (talk) 11:58, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Can't you create a section in List of Fate/stay night characters?--十八 20:03, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with the previous editor, and make sure whoever does it creates an entirely separate section called 'Fate/Prototype characters' or something. Don't mix them up since they share the same names and there is cause for confusion. Overmage (talk) 05:39, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fate/Prototype 

message: Does anyone else think that the name of this article should simply be changed to something along the lines of "Fate (franchise), since it incudes not only Fate/Stay Night, but Fate/Zero, Fate/Grand Order, Fate/Hollow Ataraxia, Fate/Kaleid Liner Prisma Illya, Fate/Prototype, Fate/Extra, Fate/Extra CCC, Fate/Extella, Fate/Grand Order - First Order, Fate/Extra: Last Encore, as well as probably several others. DJK (talk) 22:30, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Fate/stay night. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061128091133/http://www.typemoon.com/product/index.html to http://typemoon.com/product/index.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070219092633/http://typemoon.org/product/hollow/main.html to http://typemoon.org/product/hollow/main.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927034246/http://express.animax-asia.com/cp.aspx?p=WiYC1UmQWX8k1Ks9kncVdi7XIeyW2%2FP8yKKUgNzDZL8ybzT57tdq2A%3D%3D to http://express.animax-asia.com/cp.aspx?p=WiYC1UmQWX8k1Ks9kncVdi7XIeyW2%2FP8yKKUgNzDZL8ybzT57tdq2A%3D%3D
*Added archive https://archive.is/20120629084113/http://blog.fate-extra.jp/2010/01/2010122-ec14.html to http://blog.fate-extra.jp/2010/01/2010122-ec14.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:13, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Fate/stay night. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140306193630/http://www.animenation.net/blog/2006/11/22/fatezero-announced/ to http://www.animenation.net/blog/2006/11/22/fatezero-announced/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120404144346/http://www.capcom.co.jp/fate_uc/ac.html to http://www.capcom.co.jp/fate_uc/ac.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110815021558/http://www.capcom.co.jp/fate_uc/cs_index.html to http://www.capcom.co.jp/fate_uc/cs_index.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:25, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified