lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Michael Manning (fetish artist)

message: I deleted the (Tranceptor series) annotation from Cathexis and Lumenagerie -- neither belongs to the Tranceptor setting. Also updated the "no more Tranceptor as of Sep 2005" to Dec 2006. Kaleja 01:39, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Francis C. Osborn Sr.

message: Using Google's new patent search feature, I've added info on as many of F.C. Osborn's patents as I could easily find. Two comments:
#This is an interesting study of how inventors often work - sometimes single items, but very often small parts or improvements in something that exists already. It did not take as much work as it might seem to compile this, and it would be interesting to see similar lists on pages of other inventors listed in Wikipedia.
#The patent information available via Google is impressive, but there are imperfections in terms of how what I presume to have been scanners render the titles. Nevertheless I was frankly amazed at being able to access this info so readily. --A12n 01:39, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Uirapuru, Goiás

message: what exactly are "small transformation industries"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.178.168.86 (talk) 23:40, 15 December 2006‎
:It's a literal translation from the Portuguese "pequenas indústrias de transformação". It can be more properly translated as "[small] processing/manufacturing industries". Amazing that this error remained for so long: the IP's question is about to complete ten years in a couple of days. —capmo (talk) 02:28, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
File talk:Robal.png

message: It would be nice to post the svg file seeing as how you drew this as a vector graphic. Thanks. (Eeyore22 01:41, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

message: I was trying to look up the names of different sections, and found myself scrolling up and down.  Not only that, there are several languages listed.  Maybe I'm ignorant to the workings of Wikipedia, but this is "en.wikipedia.org", shouldn't there only be English? And the image on other language pages will also have their relevant language? Wikidan829 14:38, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Key
Talk:Pax Lodge

message: Previously the 'lodge' part of 'Pax Lodge' was stated to be because it was the former site of Rosslyn Lodge.  This is now no longer on the source page, but, the remaining bit of Rosslyn Lodge (Rosslyn Lodge, Lyndhurst Road, Hampstead, NW3) is part of the Olave Centre (http://ezitis.myzen.co.uk/rosslynlodge.html).  It had been a WWI hospital. Not sure how to incorporate this or if it should be incorporated. --Erp (talk) 00:44, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rosslyn Lodge
Talk:2006 United States Senate election in Rhode Island

message: I made some minor grammar changes. Many  verbs were in a tense that suggested the election is still going on. 69.221.222.110 01:44, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I remember seeing a map of RI on the news the day after the election and it looked like Whitehouse carried not just Providence but the whole northern part of the state. Obviously, I could be remembering wrong, but it seems like somthing that wouldn't be hard to double check if someone knew how to get the elections data from the Secretary of State's office.
:Rhode Island only has five counties. Providence County encompasses all of the northern parts of the state. Chafee was able to carry the other four counties, but most Rhode Islanders live in Providence County. Dadip6 17:44, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chaffee won all but Providence?
Talk:Alert Bay

message: :...the government ripped the people off.... and other stuff; needs to be rewritten with less harsh tone, or less slangy wording anyway; won't bother with the POV template for now.  Too tired to redo it right now, but heads up to someone who might want to have a go (OldManRivers?).Skookum1 11:18, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: POV content

message: Just noting that since the IR titles redirect here, the section on Population should have the reserve populations, which are separately counted from those of the Village of Alert Bay.Skookum1 (talk) 15:25, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reserve populations 
Talk:Babine Lake

message: Smudging the face with charcoal prior to visiting a new place is not a local tradition. This is a custom of the people of at least the following bands: Lake Babine, Takla, Tl'azt'en, Yekooche, Nak'azdli, Nadleh, quite possibly pan-Carrier.Bill (talk) 19:25, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: T'es-ing up
Talk:Fantastico (web hosting)

message: What the hell is this supposed to mean? For the software developers of the software that gets installed on a system, surly this should be part of THEIR software? Either this is a stupid statement or the wording is incorrect.--Hm2k 22:26, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  There are no clear mechanisms for software developers to receive notification that their software was installed on a system. 

message: ==  "This process (upgrading) is generally much more technically challenging to users who installed it via an automated control panel, rather than doing so themselves from scratch, using files from the open-source web site."
I think the article is too negative.
Installing most of this stuff without Fantastico is what is most "technically challenging".  What the author really means, is if you cant run your own server and install it yourself dont use the aps at all. For perspective, I think that the following should be pointed out: without installers a lot of people (probably most) would never get a chance to use most of these products...period.  Hosts that feature Fantastico need to keep it updated.  I have so far not had a problem updating aps using Fantastico, it will update existing sites at the click of a link... but yes, you are always running about a month behind updates released from the development team. For most people that is the tradeoff they have to make vs not running the ap at all.  Ive lost count of all the things Ive been able to try and use with Fantastico. Ray C.
: I think if it's technically challenging or not is irrelevant. It's pretty much unsourced or sourced to a blog, which isn't a reliable source. This is an encyclopedia not a set of random stuff found on the internet. Per the general requirements of neutral point of view, no original research and verifiability, I've removed the section. --82.7.40.7 (talk) 08:03, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article is too negative 

message: Whats the hostgator stuff about? Unreferenced, random internet complaint about a third party that makes use of the "Fantastico" software?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.17.236.101 (talk) 05:09, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  HostGator
Talk:Bainbridge, British Columbia

message: 337 pop. at 5395' ??  I checked the provincial gazette - via the Provincial Basemap on http://maps.gov.bc.ca - and there's only Bainbridge Cove and Bainbridge Island.  Very few towns in BC have this much elevation, also.  I'll check through my ghost towns books, but even ghost towns generally appear in the Provincial Gazette and are still marked on Basemap.  Most of them anyway, especially somewhere with over 300 people living there....Skookum1 22:08, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article may be spurious
Wikipedia talk:Main Page featured article protection/Petition

message: The undersigned English Wikipedia readers and editors call for a change to, or a cancellation of, the current policy entitled "Main Page featured article protection". We believe that:
*the site's administrators should be free to use their discretion in protecting the main page Featured Article, following the same guidelines that apply to all other articles on English Wikipedia.
*the current policy limits the ability of administrators to make sound decisions in specific circumstances, without acting against the current policy.
</br>
* –Outriggr § 01:57, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

message: Surely the only thing more evil than a poll is a poll where you're only allowed to vote one way. --Sam Blanning(talk) 02:14, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Surely I don't have to tell you it's not a vote: the first definition of "petition" is "an earnest request". This is my earnest request, as it is of those who sign. You're welcome, and encouraged, to make your own. –Outriggr § 02:23, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia works through discussion which builds into consensus; not via polls, unless there's no other way to evaluate consensus, and certainly not via flinging opposing petitions. That was my point - :m:polling is evil counts double for petitions. Petitions have all the faults of polls - i.e, they polarise editors and strangle discussion by reducing the whole debate to a 'yes/no' question - without the benefit of being able to show what the actual majority opinion is. --Sam Blanning(talk) 02:28, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I understand. I'm interested in gauging interest, not flinging anything, polarising, or anything else. These are all projections, borne out of a strong pre-existing notion about the way "Wikipedia works", to quote you. It's a wiki, and it can work however it happens to work.  Now, one of my "pre-existing notions" is that for every user who wades through talk page discussions, there are many others with opinions, who traditionally don't bother with a chorus of talk-page "me-too"s, but may bother to make their opinion known in a short form. They aren't worse people for it. If no one signs, I'll have my answer. –Outriggr § 02:43, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

text: Surely admins are free to use their discretion to protect the main page feature article already. The policy merely suggests that this not be done lightly and that in the vast majority of cases would not be appropriate. In extreme cases, there is nothing to stop the page being protected. An example of this might be if vandalism was so heavy that the page spent more time in a vandalised form than otherwise. In most cases however, vandalism usually occurs only every few minutes and is reverted within seconds. - WJBscribe (WJB talk) 02:42, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  My point was that when another admin reverts their semi-protection a few minutes later based on the existing policy, saying that the "main page FA should not be protected", they certainly are limited in their ability to act. –Outriggr § 07:11, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Film screening

message: I disagree that it's patent nonsense, but should be removed from wikipedia nonetheless. Maybe a transwiki to wiktionary is in order? Pumeleon 01:57, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry about that I accidentally pressed the "Save Page" button early. I fixed it afterwards to what I intended it to be. If you think it necessary you could move it to wikitionary but I would like to have to opportunity to develop on the page and improve on it. Maf654321 02:04, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [untitled]

message: This article needs EXPANSION and possible merging with existing articles, not deletion.
There is a planned purpose for different types of film screening.  See main article.
Film screenings are part of the production and release cycle of mass-market films, before they are widely released to theaters.  In general, "screening" applies to the displaying of a film under special circumstances. 
Screenings are presented here in rough chronological order:
*Test screenings for early edits of a film
*Focus groups - formal test screenings of an ostensibly complete film, with very detailed documentation of audience responses.  
*Private Screenings - for V.I.P.s, investors, media representatives to generate early buzz.  
*Critic Screenings - for national and major market critics in advance of print and television production-cycle deadlines. 
*Preview screenings - for the public, sometimes at boutique theaters (which are not slated for public paid audiences). Sneak previews, too. 
I will take responsibility for providing the initial batch of references.
I've commented out the tags in the main article.
--Lexein 14:16, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Disagree with deletion request

message: I propose merging Test Screening into Film Screening and redirected.
--Lexein 15:08, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Bamberton

message: A colleague and I are planning to expand this article. We would like to include more of the site's history that occurred after the cement plant closed in 1980. This includes the proposed subdivision and subsequent protests, the acquisition by the Malahat first nation and the recently proposed Steelhead LNG plant. We will also discuss the controversies surrounding this proposed LNG plant, such as concern from B.Cs Green Party, the Sierra Club of Canada and surrounding first nations.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Russell926 (talk • contribs) 22:08, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Planned update to Bamberton page. 

message: Excellent work!
A few issues:
*The last sentences under History/Before the Founding of Bamberton seem to contradict the later statements about Malahat First Nation acquisition of this land in 2015.
* The last sentence seems out of place.
Rosieredfield (talk) 21:30, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Final comments from RosieT
Talk:Trade (film)

message: Although there is no article for the author upon whose story this film is based, there is one for Daniel Radosh that summarizes the controversy associated with that New York Times story.  For context's sake, I suggest that Peter Landesman's name be linked to Radosh's article until one is established in his own name.  Asat 06:46, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I copied the text on the controversy.--Patrick 22:37, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  About Landesman 

message: Perhaps I missed something but I don't recall any conversation where the girl mentions being worried about rejection by the mother for having performed oral sex, etc. (79.190.69.142 (talk) 10:36, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: plot

message: The numbers for the box office income differ highly between the info-box in the upper right and the "box office performance" section. 77.209.164.24 (talk) 21:46, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Box office
Talk:Beatty Anchorage

message: There's not even a Beatty placename, e.g. a point or a creek, nearby.  Maybe it's a logging company name.  A citation is needed to at least prove its existence, and to provide further info; might do well to ask at the Sandspit or Tlell pages, maybe.Skookum1 (talk) 07:38, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: source needed, this isn't in BCGNIS

message: I had a look at this google search, which is for this name, excluding wikipedia, and including the provincial government domain gov.bc.ca and found quite a bit.  So it's citable; I'll add the cite from sandspit.bc.ca for now; more history of the camp and its operations and population might be found in the Forests Ministry citations and others that may be in the 122 results of the search.Skookum1 (talk) 15:01, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  re citing this 
Talk:Ghapama

message: Or is it like saying Pitza and make a pizza in triangle shape and call it Armenian?Prusan (talk) 13:23, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is not that Turkish?
Talk:Boston Bar, British Columbia

message: Currently North Bend is written up as a section here; I'm of the mind it shoudl be a separate article as North Bend, British Columbia, but am open to the idea that the two could be merged, with Boston Bar as the main article; this only because they're now linked by bridge and also because community services/facilities are shared, despite very different historeis.  Thoughts?Skookum1 (talk) 21:42, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: North Bend
Talk:Boundary Country

message: Because of an imputation in a certain CfD at present that the region articles like this one are allegedly uncited and therefore original research, I looked up some usages in Google Books and Google News:
*Google Books, 4,600 results excluding Yosemite, Mexico, Minnesota mentions and, of course, Wikipedia.
*Google News, 3 results (surprising given newspapers exist in the area; apparently Google News isn't all that comprehensive)
*Teh clincher is the British Columbia government "Boundary Country" webpage, which I'll add to the article now.Skookum1 (talk) 14:37, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Usage citations
Talk:Muhammad: Legacy of a Prophet

message: What copyvio ? --Striver 02:16, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: CopyVio
Talk:Radio Australia

message: This is me, Bill Hunter, clearing the vegetation within the Radio Australia transmitter site on the Cox Peninsula in 1972.
It's possible to work out my location on the site from the aerial photo.
Radio Australia transmitter 1972 Cox Peninsula  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.20.149.120 (talk) 17:41, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled comment
Talk:Ashley Laurence

message: I've found references to her birth name being Cohen and Coburn but I can't seem to verify either at a site that is not user edited.  I'm wondering if we shouldn't ditch the birth name thing entirely since we can't confirm.  Thoughts?  Millahnna (talk) 15:01, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: A lot of us knew her (or of her) in High School, and she was Cohen at the time.  Also, she was in High School class of 1985, which puts her birth year at around 1968.Kasajian (talk) 12:49, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth name?
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Rmky87

message: Category talk:	7
Category:	221
Image:	1
Mainspace	7272
Portal:	1
Talk:	148
Template talk:	10
Template:	1442
User talk:	671
User:	91
Wikipedia talk:	2
Wikipedia:	548
avg edits per article	2.07
earliest	02:51, 9 July 2005
number of unique articles	5028
total	10414
2005/7 	545 	
2005/8 	805 	
2005/9 	798 	
2005/10 	502 	
2005/11 	175 	
2005/12 	144 	
2006/1 	101 	
2006/2 	313 	
2006/3 	153 	
2006/4 	50 	
2006/5 	76 	
2006/6 	62 	
2006/7 	87 	
2006/8 	586 	
2006/9 	1460 	
2006/10 	2135 	
2006/11 	1813 	
2006/12 	609 	
Using Kate's wannabe as of 02:42, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Qin Hui (historian)

message: * This article should be moved to Qin Hui (professor), since the historical Qin Hui (秦檜) is more famous.--Confuzion 02:48, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: 秦檜 is pronounced Qin Kuai, I think. _dk 13:39, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Move
Talk:Sentoryū Henri

message: Shouldn't this article have Sentoryu's full name just like any other sumo article? XinJeisan 23:55, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, probably. The same is true of Kotomitsuki. But in Sentoryu's case, maybe there's a case for calling the article Henry Armstrong Miller, as I believe that's what he uses now he's an MMA fighter: "Sentoryu" is just a nickname now. The article on Futahaguro is titled Koji Kitao, for example. Pawnkingthree 09:02, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Title

message: An anon IP deleted this line without explanation: "There have been no Americans in professional sumo since Sentoryu." Who has there been then? Pawnkingthree (talk) 09:10, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: No more Americans
Talk:List of hospitals in Nebraska

message: A list might not require direct citation if list items refer to subjects of other articles where factual citations are available. In this case, there is no such internal reference. Without a citation, we have no way of knowing if these hospitals are spoofs, if they are still in business, if they have changed names or if they are named correctly in the article. If we have to start by looking for a reference not cited in the article -- i.e. if we have to go looking for an accurate current list of hospitals in Nebraska to be sure this article is correct -- why bother read the Wikipedia article in the first place?  Marakopa 02:52, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I added references that point to all the hospitals.  This list should not be a directory of hospitals.  I looked up the size of the hospitals in references, in terms of number of beds.   Age of the hospital is another factor that could be used to include it.  I will work on finding some sources for age of the hospital to determine what should be kept in this list.  It is not a list of defunct hospitals, ie it only contains active hospitals.  I also added the Healthcare networks where known. 02:35, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Burnt Church First Nation

message: This article was nominated for deletion. The outcome was speedy keep on the withdrawal of the nomination. Capitalistroadster 02:52, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: AFD nomination

message: The two pages Burnt Church First Nation and Burnt Church 14 largely overlap.  It would make sense to merge these into one page.
:It is a lot of overlap, but it's a convention within Wikipedia to keep reserve/reservation and government articles separate, likewise from the community article and the ethno one; this invariably causes redundancies in some cases but in others it's very necessary; an Indian Reserve is a piece of land and gets a certain set of categories, a First Nation/band government is a government/administrative body, a community/settlement is a place that is on the land and which is governed by the administrative body.  Just as a Mi'kmaq language page exists separately from Mi'kmaq or Mi'kmaq people, IR and FN articles are different concepts/topics.Skookum1 (talk) 16:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger
Talk:Ulrich V, Count of Württemberg

message: This page should be moved to Ulrich V, Count of Württemberg. It would be the correct spelling and all the other Württemberg rulers are spelled that way. The correct lemma is bused by a redirect though. I would do the linkfixing.--Tresckow 02:56, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move
Talk:William Dufris

message: Added three tags: Copyvio is because at least part of the text is word for word from HERE. Cleanup because it needs wikifying, and sources because it has none at present. Anchoress 03:04, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup tags

message: He has read Old Man's War, The Ghost Brigade and The Last Colony by John Scalzi. And he has read Anathem by Neal Stephenson.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.109.138.183 (talk) 03:44, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Audiobooks
Talk:Lerdo, Durango

message: Republishing factual information without publishing the source of the information is plagiarism. Wikipedia attempts to unfairly gain market position when it hides the source of information so that others are less able to rely on the source and more likely to rely on the republished information. All of Wikipedia's geography articles are plagiarized. None of them cite sources for geographic data gleaned from official sources. There are fewer than 40,000 {(fact)} tags in Wikipedia only because visitors here have massively failed to object to bold-faced plagiarism. The result is that Wikipedia becomes a source, and many of those who would otherwise turn to original sources are misdirected to Wikipedia articles that don't say where their content originated. Marakopa 03:04, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I located the source in this article. The link to the Lerdo site provides a path to basic information not usually found on municipal Web sites. My comment was based on frequent reading of articles about US locations where the source is not cited. My comment stands. Meoron's removal of my comments from this page was an unmerited attack, and an attempt to chill discussion that would improve an open encyclopedia database of topical information. Marakopa 05:03, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In the process of removing the unwarranted (fact) tag after locating the citation, I also removed opinion, which said the city is known for its friendly people, among other subjective, qualititive assumptions about the city.Marakopa 05:17, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

message: I have tagged :File:Torredelerdo.jpg, which is in use in this article for deletion because it does not have a copyright tag. If a copyright tag is not added within seven days the image will be deleted. --Chris 07:31, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Torredelerdo.jpg]] may be deleted 