lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:MÄR

message: According to the consensus here, this article should be moved to Mär (uncapitalized).  I'll go ahead and do that after a couple of days if no one objects to this reasoning... - Onmyounomichi (talk) 00:07, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Eh, I oppose. The title is an acronym, and according to the rules of English, acronyms are in caps. - The Norse (talk) 00:12, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What I don't understand is if it is short for "Märchen Awakens Romance" then shouldn't it just be MAR rather than MÄR? Why are there dots over the A? There aren't dots over the A in Awakens and that's what it's short for right? I think perhaps 'Marchen Awakens Romance' may just be a subtitle, and that the caps MÄR stylization is actually short for the "Mär" in Märchen primarily. The world they are on is called Mär-Heaven or MÄR-Heaven for example, which I'm pretty sure isn't short for 'Marchen Awakens Romance Heaven'. Ranze (talk) 04:59, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: why keep two articles having only the main characters in this this article and the minor ones in a completely different article? shouldn't this page have a list of characters in general even after having a list of the MAIN characters in this one? 
the main article doesn't even show who the main characters are, they only give out a vague explanation on what type of group they are. you will have to go on another article just to see the other characters. 
other articles about anime and manga usually have a general list of characters (minor and major) in a separate article but easy to all the others. Who ever made this article and the list of character articles, they really didn't know how to put it.
merge all articles of characters in general together and list only the most important characters in the main articleHaseo445 (talk) 15:55, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed...there should be one character list, with all of the individual character articles merged into it because none have any demonstrable real-world notability, failing all relevant guidelines for existence including WP:N, WP:PLOT, WP:WAF, and WP:FICT. None would survive an AfD. I've tagged them all for merging to the main list. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 14:01, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of Characters 

message: Why is it that the reception consists of just a single negative review from IGN? Shouldn't it have other reviews, like more positive ones? Often, I see that things usually get mostly positive reviews, but there are a few contrasting negative reviews (or vice versa). I believe that section should be improved on. Shadoman (talk) 18:38, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception
Talk:2029

message: "This has caused some people to think that the asteroid will actually make contact with Earth."  Removed from the asteroid event due to: No source cited; use of weasel words.  Brian Sayrs 01:21, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Asteroid impact

message: Why is Six Feet Under mentioned here? It is not set in 2029, is it? --El Oscuro 14:11, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Six Feet Under

message: See WT:YEARS#Eclipses for a matter relevant to this page.  Arthur Rubin (alternate) (talk) 23:08, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eclipses
Talk:Rugby union in the United States

message: I was a bit hesitant to create the redirect United States rugby, however USA Rugby is simply the name for the US governing body of rugby union, and "United States rugby" links to an article about rugby union in the US. Granted, there could be some confusion and it'd be great to find a way to alleviate some of the confusion. Hoopydink 01:23, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect Issue

message: Should we make a seperate article for the governing bodies within USA Rugby?  It seems a bit silly to have the big section in this article.  If there are no objections, I'll go ahead and create a new article in the upcoming days and try to format it in such a way that it's consistent with some of the other area unions within a nation's rugby union.  I'll also keep the section, perhaps summarise the governing structure within USA Rugby and then link to the main article. hoopydinkConas tá tú? 06:57, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No reason not to. There are precedents the IRFU's four branches each has its own article as do the state union of the ARU.GordyB 21:36, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds good.  I'll start individual articles for each of the TAU's (there are seven) in the upcoming days hoopydinkConas tá tú? 03:09, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Governing Bodies 

message: Just wondering if the term 'pocket rocket' has any meaning and is appropriate to the article, and whether it is meaningful term to refer to a try scored by the aforementioned 'pocket rocket' as a 'scintillating' one? Barnabas Brown (talk) 05:00, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inappropriate yet hilarious language use 
Talk:European free jazz

message: I started this article to give European free jazz some space and to distinguish it from American free jazz. I will expand this article in the future
--Dirknachbar 01:31, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Should these composers be mentioned? In 1964 Bennink and Mengelberg already played on Dolphy's album Last Date, featuring also a composition of Mengelberg. Furthermore, Brotzmann's acclaimed Machine Gun also featured Breuker and Bennink. Surely they are important figures in European Free Jazz. Are your sources not mentioning this?? 87.213.161.250 (talk) 00:51, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: No mention of Han Bennink, Willem Breuker & Misha Mengelberg?

message: European free jazz is under Genres in the Jazz template, but also under Regional scenes.  Could someone remove a duplicate?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:C7:C201:C640:392D:A0B8:2CF8:6818 (talk) 16:33, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplicate removal
Talk:Santanaraptor

message: Santanaraptor came from North America just like Patagopelta and Kelumapusaura did. CuddleKing1993 (talk) 20:51, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  It came from North America 

message: Did the holotype, Specimen MN 4802-V, of Santanaraptor survive the Brazil Museum fire? A sentence about whether it did or not should be added to the article. Paul H. (talk) 01:12, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: There has not been any comprehensive official list yet. FunkMonk (talk) 00:09, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did the holotype of Santanaraptor survive the Brazil Museum fire?
Talk:The Lord of the Rings: The Third Age

message: I think Berethor, Idrial and Hadhod were all in the extended versions of the movies. Or am I hallucinating?Ollie the Magic Skater 01:46, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You might be, but I would't know ^_<. Anyway, no, they're not in the movies. Because of copyright protection, they could not use 'real' characters, but only could come up with ones that looked like others. --Soetermans 21:28, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Actually, they were in the movies... 

message: Berethor does not encounter Gandalf, you only get to hear and see Gandalf's comments. --Soetermans 13:17, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot's not correct

message: So, I've heard a rumour that if you complete the game on Hard difficulty (from the start), you unlock Haldir as one of the party. Can anyone confirm this? 2.24.69.43 (talk) 20:25, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Haldir? 

message: Is needed. --MK (talk) 06:41, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gameplay section
Talk:Stan Kirsch

message: Just so anyone knows, I'm Stan's cousin Michael Greco, and I'll be updating this page periodically with photos of stan as I can.  There seems to be a definate lack of recent ones on the web, and if any actor deserves to have a fandom, it's him!
Enjoy! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mike Greco (talk • contribs) 17:22, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Mike, you're Italian??!! So you're Mother's are sisters? Are the Irish, or something? Nobody has Stan's background. All I can figure out is his surname is German, but that's all I know... Thanks for the pictures, it's great to see such a talented actor recognized.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.49.181.241 (talk) 16:46, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Photos
Talk:William Molineux

message: This is a wonderful article.  I have been researching William Molineux for many years and some of this information is entirely new to me.  It does not seem to draw from Hiller Zobel's book or from other secondary sources that are familiar to me.  I would be interested in learning how the author(s) came to know so much about this obscure patriot.  I have source material I would be willing to share, but unfortunately I don't have time to add to the article.  In any event, many thanks for the very fine research. I'm new to Wikipedia, so I hope I have done this correctly. StuartHsicci 01:53, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Davie Dodds

message: LMAO. --TheMadTim 01:53, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section vandalised by [[KarateKid7]] 

message: I propose that, when unprotected, the article be amended to the template given at WikiFootballerTemplate --TheMadTim 03:58, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amendment to article 

message: There is an error, it is stated that Dodds became a reserve coach at Rangers in 1992 and was promoted to being a first team coach when Walter Smith became manager. The problem is that Smith became Rangers manager in 1991. KarateKid7 22:32, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I know bugger all about Scottish football, but I found this page while searching for "Elephant Man"! What's the story behind this bloke's nickname? It's not mentioned in the article at all, despite the fact that (judging by a Google search) he is famed more for his alleged ugliness than for his footballing ability.
From the photos I've seen, he was not that bad looking; certainly not by the grim standards of 1970s/80s British manhood. Like other allegedly "ugly" footballers, such as Peter Beardsley, he could quite easily have improved his appearance by sporting a less crap hairstyle. 217.155.20.163 20:37, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, sorry, I have to disagree. Ahm no a poof, but even I can recognise that david dodds is one of the ugliest people ever to walk Gods good Earth.
Proof : http://www.bbc.co.uk/scotland/sportscotland/offtheball/images/illinformer/2004-05/d/davie_dodds.jpg
(Be warned, that link will take you to one of the ugliest cunts ever) --Tess Tickle 02:29, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Nope, I still fail to see how he is in any way unusually ugly. Walk around any Scottish town on a Friday night, you will see far worse. And let's face it, compared to the ugliest man in modern English football (the disturbingly un-picturesque Wayne Rooney), this bloke is practically an Adonis. 217.155.20.163 01:11, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In any event, this nickname ought to be mentioned in the article (with cited sources). -- Beardo (talk) 13:17, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elephant man
Talk:Centronuclear myopathy

message: I have edited this article to conform with several of the Manual of style guidelines. Please feel free to contact me should you have any questions.--DO11.10 22:17, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  January Copyedit 

message: External links on Wikipedia are supposed to be "encyclopedic in nature" and useful to a worldwide audience.  Please read the external links policy (and perhaps the specific rules for medicine-related articles) before adding more external links.  
The following kinds of links are inappropriate:
*  Online discussion groups or chat forums
*  Personal webpages and blogs
*  Multiple links to the same website
*  Fundraising events or groups
*  Websites that are recruiting for clinical trials
*  Websites that are selling things (e.g., books or memberships)
I realize that some links are helpful to certain users, but they still do not comply with Wikipedia policy, and therefore must not be included in the article.  WhatamIdoing (talk) 05:34, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: External links
Talk:Thurgau

message: reichsunmittelbar translates to "subject to the Emperor alone." It really helps to translate phrases from other languages into the one the article is written in.
SwissmissPat (talk) 14:33, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thurgau, Switzerland 

message: "Thurgau" is first and foremost the general term for the landscape on the south-western shore of Lake Constance. This also includes the old town of Constance itself, which, however, does not politically belong to the "Canton of Thurgau" nor to Switzerland, but is nevertheless a Thurgau town. One cannot therefore equate "Thurgau" and the "Canton of Thurgau", as is done in this article. 217.6.16.70 (talk) 12:31, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thurgau vs. Canton of Thurgau
Talk:Magnolia, Seattle

message: "Magnolia is the second largest neighborhood of Seattle, Washington by area": according to what reckoning? Given that virtually no Seattle neighborhoods have official boundaries, what does this really mean? And what is purported to be the largest? West Seattle (if you count that as one neighborhood)? - Jmabel | Talk 03:15, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That's what I figured they meant: West Seattle #1, Magnolia #2. At least with those two neighborhoods the boundaries are relatively easy to determine, because of the railroad tracks and the river. --Lukobe (talk) 05:52, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: "Second largest by area"

message: I recently uploaded a new aerial photo of Magnolia (right). Feel free to use if useful. Dcoetzee 04:02, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New aerial photo 
Talk:Queensday

message: I'm just going to make this a hard redirect to Koninginnedag. Some of the information on this page is outright wrong, and most of the relevant facts that this page does cite are already present in the other article. So merging would not serve any point. In adition, this page seems to be a copyvio in its current form. --Codemonkey 02:02, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Islamic Center of America

message: does anyone know the capacity of this mosque?
Iwanttoeditthissh (talk) 10:08, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This title is held by the Jaffari Community Centre, another Shia mosque. It is 161,000 square feet, placing it firmly above the Islamic Centre of America. MightyWinz (talk) 08:57, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  NOT the largest mosque in North America
Talk:James Marcus (Resident Evil)

message: Do you think we should list some of the differences Marcus has in Umbrella Chronicles?  Because there are quite a few.  One example being that his younger form never appears.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bryanoftoons (talk • contribs) 15:58, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Differences in Umbrella Chronicles
Talk:George Trevor

message: I belive that the bearded zombie that the player must face in the Remake is none other than Trevor. His body was after all used by Umbrella for test purposes (this is revealed in file "Family Picture") I am refering to the zombie that emerges from casket that had been filled with blood (in the crypt in graveyard). --Kurt Leyman 20:25, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: According to whom? There's nothing to indicate that the Crisom Head Prototype and George Trevor are the same. Seems like typical fanwankery to me. Jonny2x4 22:54, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The bearded zombie that the player must face in Remake - Trevor? 

message: I don't really think George Trevor is a supporting character. He doesn't team up with player in any way. I think he should be put in the list of minor characters in Resident Evil 1. --Mariofanatic 20:54, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is George Trevor really a supporting character? 
Talk:Antoine August Michel Gaujot

message: There is something that I cannot explain here. Julien's tombstone says Oct 22, 1894 to Apr 7, 1938.  How could he be a VPI class of 1894?   Either Tech has his graduation year wrong or the tombonstone is wrong.  I will go through the VPI Buble yearbooks and see if I can straighten this out.   Talk to Dr. M 02:13, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The tombstone is incorrect, showing 1894 instead of 1874.  I have seen other examples of MoH tombstones with errors.  See William Allen.  Ejosse1 (talk) 19:55, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of minor Resident Evil characters

message: Can someone tell me in which part of the game it is revealed that that's the name of the blonde woman? I've checked the games files, but that name does not appear in any of them, neither in anything that I'd remember.
If some information is not shown, I will eventually change her name to Beverly Harris, like the novel states.
:No idea.  I've seen nothing on it, although Beverly Harris is not her actual name, either, so it should be reverted back to Ms. Warren unless the person who put the name in can cite sources.  It's always possible it came from one of the latter releases for the N64 or DreamCast. Gamer Junkie 08:07, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: But there's nothing in either the original version nor the files of the lastest versions. And considering that she is named Beverly Harris in the novel, I guess it is possible to say that that's her name. (Alexlayer 10:16, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You'd have to be sure to add that the name is taken from the novels, because these novels have, on many instances, proven non-linear to the game's storyline and characters. Gamer Junkie 13:39, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Whenever someone want to revert it, s/he might better bring some source. Alexlayer 19:37, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  '''Eliza Warren?'''
Talk:Uptown Girls

message: Will there be a Sequel or Remake?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Australiaaz (talk • contribs) 09:23, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Uptown Girls 2|Sequel]] or [[Uptown Girls (remake)|Remake]]? 

message: The plot section is far too story-like and includes petty little details that aren't needed.  I'm sure many (and I) would appreciate it if someone could rewrite it.Amazeedayzee (talk) 05:59, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot section
Talk:60 Minutes II

message: I don't think you say that 60 minutes II changed its name specifically to avoid tarnishing the original show after Killian without having some proof that somebody said so, so I tagged it  a while ago.  The change to arguably is what is known in wikipedia as a weasel word, in this case a way to blame the name change on Killian by adding the qualifier "arguably?  Well, who exactly argued this?  If the people making this argument would normally be considered reliable sources (bloggers, for example) then it should be left out entirely.  If the people making the argument would be considered reliable sources, we should quote and cite them directly.  I took out all the insinuations about the name change being related to Killian; it can be restored if someone finds a source saying so. Thatcher131 02:20, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This broadcast on election fraud sounds like communism. Disgusting, you are trying to sway Americans !! Shame on all of you 2601:18C:8300:C910:A009:82A9:E733:9EFB (talk) 23:18, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  October 30 show on election fraud
Talk:Baháʼí Faith/Off Topic

message: From what i have seen here and know from your fate, it seems that you beleive in justice and equality for all. 
But yet you have spent billions of dollars building your house of justice, house of worship and Bob's shrine and others. Does that make you equal to the poor who don't have food to eat? Or the millions of children spread all over earth, sleeping on streets, getting raped, murdered, all because lack of money and people who care. Isn't spending billions of dollars on the hungry children better than spending it building shrines and houses of worship! 
Please remember that i have no quarrel with you, so please assume good faith, it was just a thought. --Darkred 01:56, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia is not a discussion forum, see What_wikipedia_is_not. -- Jeff3000 04:11, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

text: If you want the reason you may search the Baha'i websites, read some Baha'i books, and you will indeed find the answer, and it may surprise you, but as noted Wikipedia is not a discussion forum, and thank you for judging me. -- Jeff3000 05:14, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Again Wikipedia is not a forum to post "just a thought", please read the Wikipedia policies. -- Jeff3000 05:23, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Stop. Cuñado  - Talk 06:27, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just a thought
Category talk:Google services

message: Google Tasks is integrated into gmail, calendar and is available as an igoogle homepage widget, but https://mail.google.com/tasks/canvas is very difficult to find, and very useful. I spent a ton of time trying trying to find where I could manage/delete tasks lists (more than one tasks list can be generated via 3rd party android apps and via igoogle, though only one primary list is shared between calendar and gmail). I knew there had to be a way besides the way I found through a third-party android app, and I would have been delighted to have a wikipedia page pop up on the topic of Google Tasks in one of the numerous google searches I made trying to figure it all out.
Basically I'm not a wikipedian and am too exhausted by the topic to figure out how to add a page on it. And then how to get it undeleted after someone decides it's not notable or whatever fun stuff happens here.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.129.50.166 (talk) 23:53, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible Addition 

message: I marked as needs attention because of the state of this in relation to the List of Google services and tools --J2000ca 02:41, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs Attention 

message: I think the title of this category should be :Category:Google software and it should be in the category :Category:Software by company. --Aliuken (talk) 00:57, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category:Google software
Talk:Resident Evil: Caliban Cove

message: The Storyline section reads far, far too much like a press release. Lots42 16:10, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The 'Storyline' section 

message: Yes, I know about my post above. Anywho, I am 99 percent certain the text I removed was copyrighted text from the back of the book. It's also redundant, pointless marketing speak. Lots42 (talk) 16:10, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The bit I removed
Talk:Resident Evil: Underworld

message: Hmm... Resident Evil: Underworld. Not to be confused with Blade or Bloodrayne. I guess since it's a zombie movie there are no daybreakers, I mean daywalkers. 75.170.1.33 (talk) 11:12, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wow, the originality!