lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Miss Nebraska USA

message: The article states that it is about Miss Nebraska....but the article body talks of Miss Minnesota. Chelman 15:36, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Preventive detention

message: the interwiki to the dutch Wikipedia lead me to the article on Terbeschikkingstelling but this a completely different subject than the preventive detention as described here. The dutch article nl:Terbeschikkingstelling (strafrecht) is about Psychiatric imprisonment (Involuntary_commitment#Netherlands). and I believe the german article is also more about Psychiatric imprisonment than it is about preventive detention. LeeGer (talk) 13:03, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: What about 'Sicherungsverwahrung'?  I believe that's the German word for it.  Is it appropriate to have a redirect in the English branch of the Wikipedia?  71.196.246.113 (talk) 23:03, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dutch Interwiki 

message: It is hardly a secret that Denmark is hit by a huge gang war or rather gang attacks. The Danish police has recently (within the last year) created special units:
*Intensivering af bandeindsatsen – Oprettelse af Task Force, The Danish police (in DK)
And they have spent 50 millions DKK on the task (in DK)
It would ignorant to insert a "When" JohanGraham (talk) 11:19, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Denmark

message: I have deleted the content under United Kingdom, because it was grossly inaccurate. It referred to the Fixated Threat Assessment Centre (see Wiki entry) which doesn't detain anyone and has nothing to do with preventive detention. Someone needs to add in material about control orders in terrorism cases and the ruling of the European Court on the legality (illegality) of such manoeuvres.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by FRGMelbourne (talk • contribs) 14:23, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: United Kingdom

message: Deleted the entry for Canada, because dangerous offender sentences in Canada do not meet either of the definitions used in this article:  "the detention of a convicted criminal who has served their sentence, but is considered too dangerous to release", or "detention of a person without trial or conviction by a court".  The dangerous offender sentence is imposed as the sentence for a particular offence, and can only be imposed by a court after trial and conviction, through due process of law. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 03:31, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleted entry for Canada
Talk:Brian P. Stack

message: Alan, I appreciate the collaboration, and respect the articles and information therein you have provided, but please stop placing the section on the 33rd District in the article.  This article is about Brian Stack, not the 33rd District.  I would suggest that any material on NJ's districts that goes beyond a casual mention that Stack represents it is more appropriate for the article on New Jersey itself.  Nightscream 15:52, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: I added on the article that Stack is running for State Senator. I am not vandalizing. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.68.120.53 (talk) 20:08, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  State Senate 
Talk:The Shadow Line

message: I believe the publication date given for this novel (1917) may be incorrect.
It was probably first published as a book in 1917, but may have been serialized
in 1916.  See the Doubleday, Page & Co 1917 edition (scan available at Internet
Archive) which on back of title page says copyright, 1917.  But in smaller
type, at the bottom of this page, says "Copyright, 1916, by Metropolitan
Magazine Company".  Sorry, I have no idea how to verify this. REMcDowell (talk) 03:12, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
Talk:1995 New Brunswick general election

message: I recall the NDP actually used some sort of turquoise-teal colour in 1995. Even CBC's graphics showed it that way. Should we note that in this article? Kirjtc2 16:07, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure, I don't recall but it could well be.  Not sure really where we would note it and where the NDP were orange before and since and are well known as such we probably don't want to change the colours on the results table and maps. - Jord 17:17, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Potsdam Giants

message: 1.8 meters tall? That is not much by todays standards. It should be mentioned what wad the avarege height of soldiers of that era (and why), than these guys would really seem tall (and as a result difficult to find). Mieciu K 13:39, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article lacks information 

message: When I first read this it seemed like a clever ruse by some bored German history major...but actually there are sources for it out there...Thomas Carlyle seems to have written about it  , unless of course that same bored German history major is inventing sources. Paul 06:57, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Real? Fake?

message: * A man of 1.8 or 1.9 meter isn´t that tall to be "unfit for combat", he´s just larger than the average of that time.
* The "Soldier - King" never waged war, so that´s why his "Long Guys" never fought a battle.
* The whole idea isn´t as absurd as often claimed. They used Muzzleloaders and it´s much more difficult to load such a weapon if you are almost as tall as your weapon, while it´s easier to handle a weapon just extending to the height of your arms. (HerkusMonte (talk) 09:51, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  unfit for combat 

message: 6 Prussian feet may have been 1.88 metres, or it may have been 5 foot 11 in British/American feet, but it can't have been both because 5 foot 11' is only 180.34cm. Abberley2 (talk) 12:11, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: According to de:Altpreußisches Infanterieregiment No. 6 von 1675/3 it's 1.88 metres. HerkusMonte (talk) 18:39, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Conversion error

message: Does anyone know where the supposed quotation to the French ambassador comes from? My own searches for it didn't turn up anything and the edit was made with no source backing it up. Here is a link to the original revision that added this claim. For now, I tagged it as citation needed. Posidon99999 (talk) 00:10, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source for the quote to the French ambassador?
Talk:KIIS 106.5

message: This is just a glorified ad - needs more info on its' days as 2UW on the AM band too. PMA 16:15, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Given the recent IP-related commits adding a note about Mix 106.5 (WWMX) in Baltimore, I have posted pointers to WWMX (FM) and Cleveland's WMVX (and would have pointed to San Jose's KEZR too if there was a link there). These are all I could find on the first page of a Google search, but it's possible there could be other Mix 106.5's around the place. Having three or two "see also" links up top seems rather dodgy. Perhaps this should be moved to 'Mix 106.5 (Australian radio station)' or similar and make this a disambig page? -Spiky Sharkie [ talk ] 23:58, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation required? 

message: there should be a section for the radio challenges, such as the 20thousnd dollar noise, it can have a hisyory part for old wins and current guesses for the next noise. for example the noise was closing a molopoloiy box and puting it away, this could be in a old challenges section Anthony2106 (talk) 22:29, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  section for radio chanenges
Talk:Asian Underground

message: The "movement" is very much a music business creation rather than any real collective entity. 
It can hardly be claimed that the bands and artists on the list make music that is linked by any common style or theme or that they have anything in common other than that they are from Asian backgrounds. 
Pandit J of Asian Dub Foundation was especially critical of the idea that his band belonged to any sort of "movement", noting with wry amusement the implicit racism in the suggestion that Asian people had operate in "the underground" in order to make music -----
I'd agree to some degree that all lables whitin music or films that try to define genres are to a certain extent made partly for promotional reasons. Yet there are some underlying themes that join certain types of music. Let say breakbeat or reggae have distinct rythmic patterns that define the style of music. Many musicians hate being defined by certain labels (labels they did not create, but are that they are stamped with, by the media). 
Now, the label Asian underground was originally coined by Talvin Singh and used to define the "Anokha" clubnights he help create. Alot of now prominent south-asian music producers had their initial big break at the Blue Note (Shoreditch london)(Joi, ADF-dj's, State of Bengal,Osmani Soundz,).The name was also used on the compilation cd "Anokha - Soundz of the asian underground" (1996). It later became a catchphrase that many asian artists have since had problems accepting. Yet if one disects the asian breakbeat/electronica music, one sees certain patterns in allot of these South-Asian music producers/DJ's. The use of eastern instruments and arrangement style in break music, tabla beat patterns in drum'n'bass. The style is distinctly recognizable. 
All this doesn't mean that every south-asian artist born in britain is making Asian Underground. For example: the musicians: Cornershop(Rock), Punjabi MC (bhangra) asian dub foundation (Rock) should in my opinion not be on the list of Asian underground artists.
On a sidenote, The Asian Massive is in some way the US equivalent of Asian Undergound scene ,and is also the label used by six degree records to define music made by a batch of their artists (Karsh Kale, MIDIval Punditz, DJ Cheb I sabbah.
Eklipse 21:51, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Dance of December Souls

message: I really hate to be a genre nazi, but weren't Katatonia death/doom as opposed to black/doom? I'd change the genre myself, since that's what's expected of a wiki editor, but A) I don't want to be a genre warrior, and B) it says that I should discuss it here. So, thoughts? Should the genre be changed to death/doom? --LordNecronus (talk) 09:41, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It was changed by someone seemingly without discussion, so I don't see a reason not to change it back. Go for it. Nymf hideliho! 12:40, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre in the Infobox
Talk:Shepshed

message: I've been trying to find this out for ages.  Sources abound to the effect that Shepshed was a village "until recently", but I haven't been able to find anything remotely resembling a date when it acquired town status.  Is anyone out there who can enlighten? -- Smjg 16:59, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  When did Shepshed become a town? 

message: There needs to be some format fixing, in regards to twin towns, and sports, etc. Anyone that has some spare time, feel free to give it a go. - Deathrocker 23:05, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Work needed

message: Compared to what? -- Smjg (talk) 12:28, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Now, however, it is home to only 15 public houses." 

message: Jeunuk 1985 has just deleted part of the article called transport why ?
:transport is mentioned in other articles as i can remember thurnby lodge & eyres monsell and a few others why ? Sowhyman (talk) 19:17, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The difference in those articles is that the content meets Wikipedia guidelines. Jenuk1985 | Talk 19:34, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: would just the companys and route numbers be acceptable ? Sowhyman (talk) 20:53, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transport 

message: Schools have changed now iveshead school 2A00:23C7:4F09:2A01:F4CA:2AFB:CA8E:7B6C (talk) 21:48, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hindleys
Talk:Intersymbol interference

message: Some techniques try to reduce the amount of interference between consecutive symbols, such as Gaussian minimum shift keying and certain other phase-shift keying variants
as far as I know, the GMSK does not try to reduce the ISI between the symbols, but actually introduces it bgy a gaussian filter so that it will be possible to recover lost symbols according to the others using Viterbi algorithm... Can you report the source of this information?? Alessio Damato 17:02, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  GMSK wants ISI 

message: "ISI is introduced before sending by using a gaussian filter"
Do you mean prevented before instead of introduced? We do not want ISI, we want to remove it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.91.60.11 (talk • contribs) 
:On the whole, yes, it is undesired. However some systems (eg duobinary signalling) do introduce controlled ISI. Not sure offhand about GMSK, but will look into it. Either way, as part of the revamp of the article I am doing I will add details about this in. Blair - Speak to me 09:10, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  ... 

message: I have removed the following misplaced text from the end of the External Links section (reproduced here verbatim):
"Intersymbol Interference and Equalization
The all-pass assumptionmade in the AWGN (or non-dispersive) channel model is rarely practical. Due
to the scarcity of the frequency spectrum, we usually filter the transmitted signal to limit its bandwidth
so that efficient sharing of the frequency resource can be achieved. Moreover, many practical channels
are bandpass and, in fact, they often respond differently to inputs with different frequency components,
i.e., they are dispersive. We have to refine the simple AWGN (or non-dispersive) model to accurately
represent this type of practical channels. One such commonly employed refinement is the dispersive"
Idunno271828 (talk) 02:02, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: ...

message: Someone added a merge proposal from the content fork at Intersymbol interference in digital communication, but didn't start the discussion, so here it is. 
* Support obviously, as there's no sense in that small fork. Dicklyon (talk) 22:28, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Gabriel Calderón

message: Caldera played in both Racing Club and Independiente, and if I recall correctly he was a right wing, not a midfielder. But I may be very wrong... elpincha 17:25, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: He played at first midfielder (probably both in Independiente and Racing) and then wingman (say, in  the 1990 FIFA World Cup). Mariano(t/c) 08:35, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:ATG

message: ATG can also mean Automatic Tank Gauge.  Modern convenience stores use tank gauges to automate fuel tank monitoring, detect leaks, and prevent overfilling.  (Note that the acronym can also be ATGS for Automatic Tank Gauging System.)
See the U.S. EPA's guildelines for tank gauging.
--Paulfwilliams 17:33, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Dirk Pitt

message: There is much too much emphasis placed on the Sahara legal troubles. This detail belongs on the film's page ot here.Kelly F Thomas (talk) 14:27, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Legal fallout

message: When researched, it is apparent that the book series featuring Dirk Pitt has the same name as the protagonist. Therefore, should the page be documenting the book series with mention of the character Dirk Pitt, rather than the character himself? For example, Junie B. Jones is an iconic character and is the protagonist of a book series by the same name, yet the character herself does not have an individual page. dross (c · @) 15:53, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Book page vs. character page 

message: I think it should be noted in Dirk Pitt's bio that Cussler stole the story of the American plane shoot down from real life WW2 vet Louis Edward Curdes. Besides the war being changed to Vietnam, not a lot of other details were changed.
There are other similarities between Curdes and the fictional character besides the American plane shoot down. Curdes was a Lieutenant Colonel, Pitt a major (the next lower officer rank). Curdes received 2 Distinguished Flying Crosses and a purple heart, Pitt received 3 Distinguished Flying Crosses and a purple heart.
I don't know the specific term for stealing a real person's story and applying it to a fictional character, but I am almost certain that this is what happened here. Given these similaraties, I think it is extremely unlikely that Cussler was completely unaware of Curdes. 2600:6C54:7E00:C2:7D24:E057:2300:3009 (talk) 06:00, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagiarism/derivative of Louis Edward Curdes.
Talk:Domestic terrorism in the United States

message: The year listed is 1019 when it should be 1918.
From the source, "The Bureau has been investigating the criminal activities of white supremacy extremists like Ku Klux Klan members since as early as 1918." SkyTargeter (talk) 06:57, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typo under Ku Klux Klan 

message: Entries are needed for Black Liberation Army, Weather Underground, and May 19 Communist Organization, among others. Will try to get to it sometime soon. PDGPA (talk) 23:35, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Black nationalist, anti-imperialist & anti-war 1970s-1980s groups 

message: As per an RFC there is no community consensus to call January 6 United States Capitol attack as Terrorism as per this RFC .Hence it should not added this page. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 00:16, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: What would count as a consensus? That RFC you linked had at least 63 said yes, at least 42 said no, and at least 24 said wait. 2603:6011:9600:52C0:9804:53F7:C76F:B6F8 (talk) 02:56, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Did you read the first line of the summary of that RfC closure? --ZimZalaBim talk 03:29, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  January 6 United States Capitol attack
Talk:1931 Barbados Hurricane

message: The article quality is really low.  It didn't even mention a year.  The user who's been creating these articles has done some good work but has neglected some very important details.  I really wish (he'd register an account so we could tell her this. Jdorje 17:53, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The year he gives is wrong, it's 1831. If it's all right, I am merging this back with the seasonal article, and I promise I will delete nothing. Hurricanehink 01:54, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Hm
Talk:Spiral approach

message: From article: The free links used in Wikipedia also facilitate a spiral approach, since each new link taken offers more information about a subject in a non-intrusive manner that allows the reader to keep his or her attention on the main subject.
I believe this claim is original research and is not backed up in any other way. In fact, I would argue that free links are more similar to inverted pyramid style than spiral, where relevant information is presented first, and less relevant information cascaded in a separate content space. Separate content space in inverted pyramid style is text that is further down the same article, where as in free links is a different page. --Liulk 17:57, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original Research
Talk:Budgie the Little Helicopter

message: This whole article needs a major overhaul. Most of the characters' names are totally wrong (I've attempted to correct the obvious Aircraft ones), along with the other categories such as Episodes and Destinations. I would like to undertake this task at some point, but some help would be.. helpful? But seriously, whoever initially wrote some of this stuff is an idiot who knows nothing about the series. "xXx Sean's Restaurant"? For goodness sake.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.213.29.220 (talk) 22:37, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Let's give this article the quality it deserves! 

message: Blue Sky Studios will acquired the rights to turn "Budgie the Little Helicopter" into a live-action film, directed by Chris Wedge, released til Spring, 2014  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.44.167.244 (talk) 09:02, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Movie 

message: I bet that one's based on a "McDonnell Douglas MD500" --BjKa (talk) 09:47, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dougie The Police Helicopter 

message: in 2017, furry creator, ChespinBeefeater have sparked a Kangaroo-like Doppelgänger of Budgie was dubbed Bridgie the Heligator the part of Furry fandom and The Dreamstone   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:8003:2592:7000:41EB:8683:BB1D:860B (talk) 21:36, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The issue isn't whether this is true or not. The issue is that the source you are using does not meet Wikipedia's reliable source requirements. See WP:RS. Thanks, Aoi (青い) (talk) 22:25, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  is that True or Not on Furry Fandom and phenomena?
Talk:Electron cloud

message: "Electron cloud is not a term used by the Nobel Prize laureate and acclaimed educator Richard Feynman" .... It's not? OK, what is it then? This article is a bit hard to read and I gently encourage integrating it with the electron orbitals article (because improving this one would mean duplicating content), however for today I'm linking to it so that my "friend" can get all the available Wikipeformation. 125.236.211.165 (talk) 10:39, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wait, what!? 

message: I'm going to propose this article be deleted, as it's a somewhat inferior version of atomic orbital. Anything here which isn't already in atomic orbital (I can't find much) can always be added over there as summary, if anybody needs to. SBHarris 23:04, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Support - agreed, this should just be a redirect to atomic orbital. Polyamorph (talk) 17:48, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

text: Disagreed. Instead of merging someone should rewrite this article to correspond term Electron cloud used in article Atom. All electrons surrounding atom form an electron cloud. Electron cloud can be divided into electron shells, subshells and atomic orbitals. Electron cloud is not the same term as atomic orbital.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.190.175.192 (talk) 17:31, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

text: Abstain (because I do not known enough) — but I would like to point out that atom also has a section on electron cloud, which might be a better place than atomic orbital for this material. The question to ask is surely "How should information about atomic structure be organised?". Also, this material is more a description of the history and possibilities of  a theory than a formulation of its current state. PJTraill (talk) 13:32, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Moreover, I have the impression that there is a lot of duplication between Atomic orbital and Electron configuration PJTraill (talk) 13:44, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

text: Disagree on the merge itself. The term "electron cloud" does not refer only to atoms and indeed the article does not say it does. It does not see like an appropriate merge to me. --Bduke  (Discussion) 23:39, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

text: *While "electron cloud" might be a somewhat nebulous concept, I don' see what is to be gained from merging it anywhere. If the link goes to atomic orbital, it will be incorrect and will set the kids off on the wrong foot. The link should be to uncertainty principle, but are we really asking people to start their voyage into the world of quantum mechanics by a point which is so misunderstood? 88.24.235.69 (talk) 00:00, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  {{Anchor|Merger proposal}} Delete, and merge any unique material into [[atomic orbital]]?

message: Is this statement misleading. "The model evolved from the earlier Bohr model, which likened an electron orbiting an atomic nucleus to a planet orbiting the sun." That sounds like the Rutherford model. Bohr deviates from this by stating that orbits can only be of fixed/set energy levels.
----  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.145.246.27 (talk) 14:08, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Bohr or Rutherford model