Talk:Karakul (hat)

message: It's a hat. That's all. All the religious nonsense does is make this already inadequate "article" even more confusing. Typical wikiality.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.139.127.189 (talk) 23:57, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WAY TOO MUCH REFERENCE TO RELIGION

message: The improperly formatted first citation in the introduction (which in the reference list is a broken link) leads not to an "Afghan Karakul website" but to a catalog of karakul hats sold by a distributor in Pleasanton, California. What makes the "authenticity" of this site even more questionable is that one of the 3 hats for sale is a Karakul baseball cap being modeled by a woman. AnthroMimus (talk) 15:18, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Afghan Karakul website? 

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 18 November 2011 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 19:37, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:M.ALI JINNAH.jpg Nominated for Deletion

message: In the African section there is this unsourced statement: " When worn properly, these caps are always slanted at an angle, and never placed straight on the head." This sounds like WP:OR. I will remove it if no one objects.IrishStephen (talk) 19:18, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct method of wearing Karakul? 

message: In this article it is credited as karakul, in the article about Papakha the exact same hat is given as papakha. In an other article it might even be a swim cap.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.2.87.197 (talk) 05:49, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  So what's on Brezhnev's head: karakul or papakha? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Karakul (hat). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060531022711/http://infurmation.com/press_detail.php?id=99 to http://www.infurmation.com/press_detail.php?id=99
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080510115715/http://www.furcommission.com/news/newsF02d.htm to http://www.furcommission.com/news/newsF02d.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:24, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The etymology here seems suspect. The article says that the hat is named after the qaraqul sheep, but the article for the sheep says that the sheep is named after a city called Qorako'l, whereas the article for the city says its name is Uzbek for "black lake", not "black fur". Now, I don't speak Uzbek, but I do speak Turkish, which is closely related, and I can say that the Turkish for "black lake" would be "kara göl" while "black fur" would be either "kara kürk" or "kara post". There may some other Turkic word for fur that I don't know that is similar to kul, but the "black lake" explanation seems much more reasonable to be.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.38.193.33 (talk) 20:14, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology