Talk:Edwin Jarvis

message: I removed the lgbt link.  Ultimate Jarvis is gay, but the real Jarvis is not.
And until Ultimate Jarvis gets his own article, it's appropriate that the category link remain. CovenantD 23:47, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A spurious argument, since Ultimate Nick Fury has his own article, so there's no need to stick that category tag on the Nick Fury article. --khaosworks (talk • contribs) 12:27, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Well, nothing's stopping you from categorizing Kestrel in African-American supervillains and Caucasian supervillains if those categories exist. The simple truth of the matter is that the LGBT comic book characters category does exist and is appropriate for this article, and given that people are reverting you, it appears that others agree as well. There are many merged articles with Ultimate and 616 versions simply because there's not enough information to warrant two articles. In the case of Ultimate Nick Fury, there is enough, that's why the article was split up. Yes, the case is closed, but not in your favor. Perhaps you may like to seek a Wikipedia:Third opinion? --khaosworks (talk • contribs) 22:47, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Um, the B of LGBT is 'bisexual' so technically (though this is not the case for Jarvis) using Aunt May is an invalid example. Lots42 (talk) 09:08, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: The status of Ultimate Jarvis

message: After viewing many of the other articles in :Category:LGBT characters in comics, it appears to be acceptable to list them there, even if only one of their "incarnations" was gay.  So, even though Edwin Jarvis is not gay, Ultimate Jarvis is, so the LGBT category is appropriate.  I hope this helps to resolve this dispute.  If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page.  Amalas =^_^= 17:57, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Jarvis is not Ultimate Jarvis. It's like comparing apples and an orange dipped in red food coloring. Lots42 (talk) 22:26, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Third Opinion

message: Doesn't Jarvis support his mother on his Avengers salary? I seem to remember seeing her in one old comic. 
And what's up with Jarvis going from balding and thin (Avengers #400) to fat and grey in Perez/Busiek issues? I can understand the grey but not the fat. Jarvis is too smart for that, considering his line of work.
Lots42 01:48, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mother 

message: In the appropriate "Civil War" trade, Jarvis says that is Stark lets that "Tigra %^#$" back into the Avengers he can find someone else to do the laundry.  The author of part of the main article has quoted "%^#$" as "bitch", and that's an understandable reach, but its not accurate.  
The author of the piece also has Jarvis saying he'll quit - that's not clear either because Jarvis is a butler, not a personal valet. Butlers don't do laundry. Also, Jarvis experiences a sort of breakdown when he doesn't have Avengers to care for: at the start of the Busiek run, for example.  I'm just saying that you should quote the line and let readers seek their own interpretation, rather than extrapolating likely explanations.
:Jarvis is Jarvis. I'm sure he'd do laundry if needed. And what's with him hating on Tigra. Tigra -supported- Iron Man! Lots42 06:17, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing "bitch" from the article 

message: :Image:Av201.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 04:06, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Av201.jpg

message: This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject.  If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class.  The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject.  Comics-awb (talk) 16:26, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Comics B-Class Assesment required

message: I think Jarvis' post-Civil-War thoughts on Tigra should be mentioned more nuetrally but I am unsure as to what exactly...Lots42 (talk) 09:08, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I see such thoughts are duplicated in the redundant 'personal life' section. That needs to be merged. My concerns were for the regular bio section. Lots42 (talk) 09:10, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Tigra

message: As this B-Class article has yet to receive a review, it has been rated as C-Class. If you disagree and would like to request an assesment, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment and list the article. Hiding T  14:01, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: C-Class rated for Comics Project

message: Any details on when Jarvis was replaced by a Skrull should be heavily referenced. Partly because notable events happened around this time, like 'Jarvis' being shot clean through the shoulder by a disgruntled employee. I wonder how the Skrulls deal with injuries like that. Lots42 (talk) 12:53, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Real Jarvis or not

message: This article (and it's not alone) treats the computer version of Jarvis as having originated in the movie, completely ignoring the 90s animated series.
:Whoever posted this comment should make those changes themselves. Spidey104 21:04, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It was called H.O.M.E.R. not Jarvis, predating the AI J.A.R.V.I.S. from the Marvel Cinematic Universe. (JoeLoeb (talk) 02:50, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: J.A.R.V.I.S.

message: I think the AI character should have its own page. Will (Talk - contribs) 04:18, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I Oppose the split. The only references to the AI character are small comments in the "In other media" section and not notable enough to have a separate article. Spidey104 21:04, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  No, same as always. (JoeLoeb (talk) 02:49, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  There does need to be some mention of JARVIS as an AI in the main article. JARVIS first appears in the appearances section as an AI and it is unclear whether it is related to the comic character. I'd do it myself but I am unsure of the etiquette. A sentence saying "JARVIS is also the name of an artificial intelligence that has appeared in animation and movies featuring Iron Man. It is not known if there is any relationship besides an homage to the comic book character." should do. But under a subhead? What level? 2001:558:6040:62:2D5C:A3FD:BC3:1C71 (talk) 06:30, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

text: Considering the fact that J.A.R.I.V.S. and Jarvis exist in two separate fictional multiverses, with the only ties being the name and the fact that they could both be considered a "personal assistant" the similarities are like having a personal chatterbot/automation system to having a butler. When I first tried to look up J.A.R.V.I.S. I was confused because it linked me to a butler. At the very least the reference should be at the top, not at the very bottom of the page. The marvel cinematic universe is different than the marvel universe, I think that all of the Marvel Cinematic multiverse  characters should have a separate page than the Marvel Universe characters, I think this page should be spilt even if in the MCU stark's assistant was a real butler.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by GeekX (talk • contribs) 19:26, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

text: Split: , , and the anonymous contributor are right. Just like the Marvel Cinematic Universe, the Earth-616 versions of Edwin Jarvis and the A.I. J.A.R.V.I.S. are separate characters. --Rtkat3 (talk) 18:55, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: A.I. split

message: Morning! I'm here because I'd like to request people's views on the naming of the AI Jarvis throughout the current Marvel Cinematic Universe. Even within one article, we're referring him to as either JARVIS or J.A.R.V.I.S. However, on checking the credits for The Avengers (the only one I own with him in), He's credited as "Jarvis". The only evidence we've got of the term to be an acronym comes from the novel, which doesn't maintain complete continuity, so it's highly likely it isn't an acronym, and the crediting of an official source puts it as non-capitalised. Can anyone with Iron Man 1/2 check how he is credited? Basically, I'd ask that, if the first two films confirm The Avengers' crediting, we refer to him in all MCU articles as "Jarvis". The different naming standards can be confusing to someone who knows what they mean, let alone a complete outsider. Thanks!  drewmunn  talk  10:21, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Personally, I think that any information about the AI Jarvis should be contained under the acronym "J.A.R.V.I.S." The rest of the article should be about the human character, and refer to him by his last name, "Jarvis". Fortdj33 (talk) 13:56, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: But if that goes against the source material, can we do it and remain factually accurate? WP:COMMONNAME might suffice, but can we prove that "J.A.R.V.I.S." is a common term used to refer to the AI, especially when it's normally pronounced "Jarvis", barely written? We generally stick to what's in the credits, rather than extrapolation from information given, as in the Ducard vs Ghul case.  drewmunn  talk  14:10, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

text: I just checked, it's Jarvis in both Iron Man 1 & 2.--Krystaleen 15:08, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Cheers! So unless WP:COMMONNAME can trump it, I think we should standardise references.  drewmunn  talk  15:09, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

text: I think that sticking to the credits (source material) is the best plan of action. Wickedlizzie (talk) 23:26, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

text: So...are we not doing this anymore? Argento Surfer (talk) 17:04, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  A.I. Jarvis 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Edwin Jarvis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090119122651/http://www.getthebigpicture.net/blog/2009/1/12/paul-bettany-will-take-orders-from-iron-man-again.html to http://www.getthebigpicture.net/blog/2009/1/12/paul-bettany-will-take-orders-from-iron-man-again.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:38, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified