lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Bigga

message: I asked a Jamaican on YouTube who makes their cream sodas, as Caribbean cream sodas are of the British type: clear and vanilla flavoured. They replied that D&G and Bigga are the biggest brands sold over there (unlike the U.K where the Scottish company ‘Barr’ predominates) and sure enough I could find some mention of them online but not enough info or company history for an article. If we have an article called something like Bigga (drinks manufacturer) one day then let’s not forget to add a link to this page. Overlordnat1 (talk) 12:20, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cream Soda
Talk:Stratford High Street DLR station

message: I cleaned up the image, it was a bit too dark, so I altered the lightness of it a bit so I could see the roadway, etc.Wipsenade (talk) 10:49, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: -)Wipsenade (talk) 10:44, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleaned Up

message: 1846 or 1847? If the former, can the entry on the London wiki  be updated please. Jackiespeel (talk) 15:55, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: 14 June 1847 (see Butt 1995, p. 222). Dates on other Wikis are outside our control; and being Wikis, must never be used as sources. --Redrose64 (talk) 16:35, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of opening of previous station

message: Just before I get the green light, I propose that the name be changed to Stratford High Street railway station (DLR) to fit with the naming convention of the rest of the train stations. LordSavage1997 (talk) 16:18, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @LordSavage1997 No, as it matches the majority of (non interchange) DLR stations - Abbey Road DLR station, Star Lane DLR station, Beckton DLR station, Elverson Road DLR station etc etc. Do not change this without seeking consensus - the best place for that would be Wikipedia:WikiProject London Transport.  Turini2 (talk) 17:04, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  Probably best to take it to WP:UKRAIL as that WikiProject is more over-arching than the LT one, if you wanted to change it. I do, however, doubt it would gain much support, however. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 17:43, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Name change
Talk:Move Your Body (Eiffel 65 song)

message: EDIT: it's probably referring to a remix, or i was listning to a remix.. (it would still be nice to have a secondary source to verify the original lyrics tho...)
at least at time of writing, the "full lyrincs" link, is.. missing parts.. I haven't thoroughly checked, but noticed, for instance, the red text i added here, is missing,
jump your mind mind
jump your body move your mind
move your mind mind
jump your body body
jump your mind mind
jump your body move your mind
move your mind mind
jump your body move your 
move your body,
every everybody.
move your body,
come on now everybody.
move your body, move your body.
everybody come on now everybody.
Move your body, every everybody, Move your body,
come on now everybody,
Move your body, Move your body, everybody come on now everybody,
you want to move the world,
start with your body.
yo, come on you gotta start with something.
if you wanna move your mind,
just move your body.
move your mind, move your mind,
it's gonna cost you nothing.
you want to move someone,
start with your body.
yo come on and try to move somebody.
if you wanna move alone,
then everybody will move along with you..
Read more: EIFFEL 65 - MOVE YOUR BODY LYRICS 
Thus,at least as of writing, we should NOT claim 
"Full lyrics of this song at MetroLyrics", since the lyrics are incomplete.. (or at least i think they are? see red text above)
Divinity76 (talk) 02:55, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Full lyrics" link is.. incorrect 
Talk:Lee Valley Ice Centre

message: The article says it's in the Lee Valley, in East London. Great, that's only about 10 miles long by about 1 mile across of parkland / built up area to search. Imc 22:08, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Where is it?
Talk:Heart of Neolithic Orkney

message: in the meantime there is also a german Version of this page existing; - please, can someone link to it? -- Hartmann Schedel  Prost  16:58, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: done. --Mais oui! (talk) 09:05, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  german Version 

message: Please add this to the map. I assume that it's the name of the thin, "connecting" piece of land between the stones of Stennes and Brodgar?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.189.249.30 (talk) 21:27, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  No "Ness of Brodgar" label on map
Talk:The Wedding (1901 play)

message: There is a mistake- Wernyhora doesn't struck anybody dead at the end of the drama. That's a lie. They are hypnotised by a revived straw-cover (which brought ghosts to a wedding), and they dance to its music. Besides- death on an ending would be nonsense, because of different symbolism. People on wedding symbolise nation, which is asleep and unconscious under foreign rulers and they "dance as they play for them" (polish folcloristic proverb). They are not dead, they are "just" hypnotised, because they wasted their chance for freedom (uprisings)
Sorry for bad english, I hope you understand all of text. -- The preceeding unsigned comment was added by User 83.4.201.147 on  22:13, 15 August 2007.
::No worries. This kind of mistake is easily fixed. I think it is but a mistake, not a lie, and you meant to say scarecrows, or is it the rosebush canes straw-wraps? --Poeticbent talk 00:33, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Portopia Serial Murder Case

message: Portopia was actually voted Japan's 32nd favourite Famicom game, as highlighted by the Famitsu poll in 2003, done in conjunction with Enterbain. SOURCE and translation of said list: 
http://www.ntsc-uk.com/feature.php?featuretype=ret&fea=FamicomHistory
The 1UP source for it being 19th is dead, and besides which, it is incorrect. I would change the article, but every time I fix a factual mistake on Wikipedia, some hotshot editor reverts it on grounds of vandalism or not enough sources. So, I leave it to you, to sort this mess.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.136.48.187 (talk) 13:27, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Voted order

message: Although short, I see no aspects of the coverage that are underdeveloped or missing, making this a great example of a good article. I note with particular surprise that is almost all the product of a single author -great work! Phil Sandifer 19:00, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! Kariteh 21:16, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Good article

message: Shouldn't the article use the original Japanese name because the game doesn't have an official English name. --Mika1h 19:32, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, there is no guideline that says that Japanese names must always be used over "unofficial" English names. The current guidelines are to use the most common title, even if this most common title is unofficial. It has recently been discussed at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions#Video game article naming conventions - proposal, but the result was that the current rule is fine. Kariteh 21:16, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name 
Talk:Brae

message: Now we have three different possibilities:
* hill
* a slope to the sea
* from the Old Norse word breiðr meaning broad
At the very least the wording needs to connect the third of these theories with the first two, but none of them are cited. Let's do some digging here. Ben MacDui 20:11, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology 
Talk:Vidlin

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:47, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: The co-ordinates for the map are not correct for Vidlin, being too far West. I would change it myself but I'm not sure how to do it. Tony Corsini (talk) 15:30, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for pointing this out. It's fixed. Ben MacDui 18:11, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Co-ordinates
Talk:Senrid

message: I don't think I'd call The Trouble with Kings a sequel to Senrid. While they take place in the same world, and out of the published books, it's the next one that occurs chronologically, the two books aren't really linked. Jennifu 16:34, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh! Thanks for catching that, I just reflexivly interperated the Works of Sherwood Smith (by world) wrong. I havent actually read either of those yet, oops.—AltiusBimm 17:40, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Canalside Studios

message: Should this article be part of the above? --Stormbay 22:26, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[University of Huddersfield]] 
Talk:Sherry Boschert

message: Boschert deserves her own Wikipedia entry.  She is a driving force in the electric vehicle community, especially in terms of plug-in hybrid vehicles.  I know I have started very simply, but I am sure people will add to the page very soon.  I am a friend of Ms. Boschert, and I have used her as a reference in articles I have written for EVWorld.com.  I have no financial ties with Ms. Boschert and/or the success of her book.  
I cannot figure out how to solve the formatting problem in the reference.  Please help!Fbagatelleblack 04:51, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You used , and what you were seeing was the two columns. ←BenB4 00:45, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article
Talk:Arthur Corbin

message: Anybody know?  We need a date.  Surely it's out there.  7&6=thirteen (☎) 18:20, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: May 1, 1967. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 21:45, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  7&6=thirteen (☎) 11:41, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Exact date of death?
Category talk:LGBT-related songs

message: I suggest to include in this category not only songs that deal with LGBT lyrically but also songs that are lgbt-related through music videos. A Man from Poland (talk) 17:55, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lyrics and videos. 

message: Do songs that have hints of homosexuality count (e.g. "Jailhouse Rock", "You've Got to Hide Your Love Away". There was a topic called "Lists of songs about homosexuality" but it got deleted.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.164.57.137 (talk) 23:44, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do songs with LGBT allusions count?
Wikipedia talk:Protected titles/Historical list of titles/August 2007

message: Can someone add Wikipe-Tan to the list of salted pages? It was originally deleted, and protected to prevent recreation. 141.157.9.21 22:40, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This isn't the page to make page protection requests, for that see here. Also, salting pages is really for cases where the page is constantly being re-created when it shouldn't be. Cheers. --MZMcBride 15:29, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

message: The page Super Mario Bros. Z currently exists as a redirect. Please either delete the redirect or, if it is acceptable, remove it from this list. Thanks – Gurch 21:38, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: — xaosflux Talk 02:05, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pages that exist
Talk:My Boy Lollipop

message: Wikipedia had this listed as released in May 1964.  Since it was first on the NME charts on March 18, 1964,https://www.officialcharts.com/search/singles/my-boy-lollipop/ this is impossible.  Some sources claim as early as Feb 1964, but I have not yet found any definitive proof.  For now I have changed the release date to "Feb or March 1964 (UK)," with sources for each.
Perhaps May was an album release, or US release date.  In any event, a May date is highly misleading without more information.  Sojambi Pinola (talk) 14:44, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release date of Millie Small's version
Talk:Al Lewis (lyricist)

message: I'm not sure whether "I'm Ready" should on the list of songs written by Al Lewis. I put it on the list because of this statement in Fred Goodman's 2015 biography of Allen Klein, on page 17: "The unlikely duo [Al Lewis and Sylvester Bradford] soon scored another modest success with [Fats] Domino on "I'm Ready" ...", but the I'm Ready disambiguation page says "I'm Ready" was written by Pearl King, Ruth Durand, and Joe Robichaux and recorded by Fats Domino in 1959. Which is right? Strawberry4Ever (talk) 15:42, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'm Ready
Talk:Kesva an Taves Kernewek

message: The organisation's website states that, although most of the Kesva's members use Kernewek Kemmyn, the organisation recognises the use of the Standard Written Form for education and public life.  Does the statement that "In 1987 the Board voted to adopt the Kernewek Kemmyn form of Cornish as its standard." need qualifying?  Skinsmoke (talk) 18:57, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The Cornish Language Board isn't the same as the Welsh Language Board, it's more of a language society than an official regulator. The Board adopted KK as its standard form in 1987, but the other language societies didn't. The use of Cornish in education and public life is the responsibility of the official language body, the Cornish Language Partnership. --Joowwww (talk) 22:46, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for that Joowwww.  I think I understand what you're saying.  However, the wording as it stands gives the impression that the Kesva supports Kernewek Kemmyn and is therefore opposed to the Standard Written Form.  That doesn't appear to be either what is intended, or indeed to be the position of the Kesva.  I suspect the wording predates the general adoption of the Standard Written Form over the last year or so, and maybe it needs tweaking/updating?  Skinsmoke (talk) 17:06, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've edited the article to include references to the current website, and removed information without references. Hopefully now it should make the situation a bit clearer. The Kesva officially supports the SWF but it only does so begrudgingly, some people in it would prefer KK to be the standard. --Joowwww (talk) 01:19, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for clearing that up!  Skinsmoke (talk) 02:01, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Standard Written Form
Talk:Cairn na Burgh Beag

message: Cairn na Burgh Beg on both OS 1:50,000 and Gazetteer for Scotland. Finavon 13:57, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The question has to be asked though, which year? The OS has been moving back towards Gaelic spelling for a number of years now. --MacRusgail 23:50, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: current on-line "Get a Map" with 2007 date - . Finavon 21:44, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know what their rationale is. Stac Levenish is marked as "Leibhinis" now. Some parts of the Hebrides get it, others don't. --MacRusgail 16:54, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:John Brown (offensive tackle)

message: Was he born in 1939 or 1946? Both are shown.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mal7798 (talk • contribs) 10:00, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of Birth Discrepancy 
Talk:Percolation threshold

message: In "Thresholds for 2D continuum models", the last column for "Disks of radius r", the first of the two numbers contains a typo.
It currently says 1.466322(2), and should probably be 1.436322(2), consistent with the other number in the same column, and with the other columns. I am going to check this once more and fix it in a while, unless someone objects.
Frepa314 (talk) 17:52, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Typo in a table

message: This is a very interesting article. Unfortunately, some of the tabulated figures are not as clearly labeled as they ought to be. For instance, I suppose that some of the tables refer to pc, which has been previously defined. But the article doesn't really say so. In other places the article refers to p1, p2, etc, without explicitly defining what these different probabilities represent (connectivity in x, y, and z directions? I have to guess).
Anyway, I'm going to work on some of the idiomatic and grammatical problems in the existing article. If anyone who contributed the numerical results can describe what they mean, more explicitly, I'd appreciate the input. Thanks!  DavidCBryant 22:51, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Imprecise description of tabulated figures

message: There's an incomplete reference without a note where that was published, neither google nor any of the article search engines I use can find it:
 # ^ Ziff, R. M.; Gang Hu (2008). "Percolation on lattices of the kagome class".
Could you please add more information about that article? --Rubik's Cube (talk) 11:26, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Incomplete Reference

message: Discussing notation the article states:
.
'...The notation such as (4,82) comes from Grünbaum and Shepard,[2] and indicates that around a given vertex, going in the clockwise direction, one encounters first a square and then two octagons. ...'
.
I believe this is either a poor description or otherwise is simply incorrect.  Specifically the requirement to go in the 'clockwise direction' cannot be correct, especially when no initial alignment is specified, and no particular vertex is specified.
.
The images and associated notation are likely to be at odds with the instruction to go in the 'clockwise direction' when looking at any given vertex in all but the most simple tilings. 
70.185.127.32 (talk) 19:19, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poor description or possibly incorrect 

message: : Percolation threshold is a mathematical term related to percolation theory, which is the formation of long-range connectivity in random systems.
Sorry, which is the formation of long-range connectivity in random systems?  Is percolation threshold the formation, is the term ‘percolation threshold’ the formation, or is percolation theory the formation? —Tamfang (talk) 05:24, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  what refers to what which relates to what?
Talk:List of University of Calgary people

message: This page is very incomplete and has been for a number of years.  Recommend deleting Japolo 23:00, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:MV Argyle

message: This article has been automatically assessed for WP:SHIPS as stub-class because there is a stub template on the article page. HausTalk 22:47, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:MV Isle of Mull

message: It was said that some metalwork was cut away to reduce weight until the ship could be modified.  There were also rumours on Mull that the cutlery was replaced with plastic cutlery to reduce weight from which the nickname "Tupperware Princess" came but this could be an urban legend!  --jmb 11:15, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Overweight
Talk:Western Ferries

message: Why "had to"? 86.132.142.207 (talk) 00:04, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The Sound of Jura had to be ordered from Norway" 

message: Why no mention of these services after 1970?  Are they still running?  If not, considering that Western Ferries was established to provide a service to Islay, why not? Skinsmoke (talk) 18:19, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The services do not run today. Google provides the following information: In 1974 the newly formed Caledonian MacBrayne used some very questionable competitive tactics by deploying their new vessel, the MV Pioneer, with government subsidies, thereby under-cutting Western Ferries, effectively ousting Western from the route. Maybe something regarding this should be added to the article Scanbus (talk) 20:01, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Islay and Jura services
Talk:Biological system

message: If "organ system" and "biological system" mean the same thing then why does wikipedia have two distinct categories for them? :Category:Organ systems and :Category:Biological systems. Should we delete the former category and move everything in it to the latter? svadhisthana (talk) 01:49, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The title of his article must be reverted to "Organ systems", because term "Biological systems" means much more wide field. Lowest lewel of biological systems is level of molecular biosystems (some of them are reserched by Systems biology), the highest for this moment is a level of biosphere. The journal "BioSystems" covers other field but not organ systems... () --Rencas (talk) 13:02, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Organ vs. Biological systems 

message: * In this edit text was copy/pasted here from the systems (biology) article. 
-- Mdd (talk) 00:15, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy-paste registration 

message: What about systems that are unique to non-human organisms? Where can I find a discussion of those? -Agur bar Jacé (talk) 21:17, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Since it's not specified that this is an article on human biological systems, would it be useful to change the title to "Human Biological System" or add a section for non-human organisms?--Donnarahgoshay (talk) 04:21, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Only human systems? 

message: I think that it would be beneficial to add examples of more systems into this page since its mentioned in the lead section of the article. I was thinking about adding in a section for cellular organelle systems. These are a few sources I've looked at for potential references if anybody would like to look through them.
1. Human Anatomy and Physiology  
2. Foundations of Systems Biology by Hiroaki Kitano  
3. Modeling Biological Complexity using Biology System Description Language  F. Muggianu, A. Benso, R. Bardini, E. Hu, G. Politano and S. D. Carlo, "Modeling biological complexity using Biology System Description Language (BiSDL)," 2018 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM), Madrid, Spain, 2018, pp. 713-717.
doi: 10.1109/BIBM.2018.8621533 | http://ieeexplore.ieee.org.libproxy.albany.edu/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=8621533&isnumber=8621069}}
Kristenforehand (talk) 06:13, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources for Use Within Article
Talk:Universal powerline bus

message: The article says "Universal Powerline Bus" is proprietary, but it fails to mention who originated it, when it was originated or introduced to the market, and who, if anyone, owns the rights to the name, i.e., is the name trademarked. — Quicksilver (Hydrargyrum)T @ 23:15, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origins and ownership
Talk:Lynn Canal Highway

message: The existing article was edited at some point to entirely leave out all criticism of the road, and only discusses benefits of the road. A "good" article should include both perspectives, and cite all criticism and benefits.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.229.79.11 (talk) 20:53, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, but you need to provide reliable sources for that information. The link to the embedded homemade YouTube video neither contained the information you added, nor would it be considered a reliable source even if it did contain the information you added.  Brycehughes (talk) 06:26, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

text: It wouldn't be so bad if it were limited to this article.  However, the same biased perspective was added to numerous related articles.RadioKAOS (talk) 04:02, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality