lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:House of Thani

message: Most of those listed are "redlinked" but I think it can be fixed by minimizing the links. There are articles on a few of those listed but the name of the articles do not include the "Sheik". If the "Sheik" is removed from the brackets, at least a few of the links will "turn blue." I would do it, but I don't have the patience right now to go through all of them manually. Is there some sort of program that can do it automatically? Sincerely, --Pink Bull (talk) 01:32, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  broad wikilinks 

message: The page lists Hamad bin Abdullah Al Thani as Emir, but it seems that he died before becoming Emir... or, if he was Emir, then the page about him is incorrect, as it lists his son Khalifa as being the fifth rather than sixth Emir... I don't know which is correct, but it would be nice if somebody knowledgeable could sort this out. --Smári McCarthy (talk) 09:56, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shiekh Hamad bin Abdullah Al Thani?? 

message: The family tree appears to not be properly formatted Irbananaking (talk) 04:01, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Family Tree
Talk:Tensor contraction

message: I think it's better to avoid using four-dimensional (or any specific dimension) tensors since this is often against the modern use of tensors (the abstract index concept of tensors). --Freiddie 22:00, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abstract Indices 

message: In the spirit of "be bold", I did a lot of work on this article, moving stuff around and rewriting a lot. In particular, I took out all of the 0...3 stuff that is specific to physics, and I put the abstract definition first. I also removed a lot of redundancy; e.g. the (1,1) case was discussed in about 4 different ways previously. Please respond here if you have issues with the rewrite (which is still a work in progress). Thanks -- Spireguy (talk) 19:43, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major rewrite 

message: It would be good to have some mention of the colon notation for contractions, commonly employed in mechanics.  A \cdot B indicates contraction over one index, A : B is a contraction over two indices, and A :: B is a contraction over four indices.  (For a random example, see .) — Steven G. Johnson (talk) 20:11, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colon notation 

message: I understand that Wikipedia is more of an encyclopedic formulation of things.  However, I note that often articles are excessively abstract and general without giving simplistic strait forward concrete examples that do exist.  Admittedly this article is maybe better than average on being readable.  That said I would like to see some easy examples of tensor contraction.  They might not be the most general formalization and certainly not the most abstract description, but they would be useful to those unfamiliar with the subject.  After all tensors were not developed in the abstract.  They began first with scalars then with vectors then with matrices and so on.  Why not show tensor contraction with a matrix and then with a system of rank 3?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Berrtus (talk • contribs) 00:43, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Most Simplistic Examples Needed 

message: I'm also a mathematician, if a bit out of date, but I think articles like this need a bit of historical context to motivate the abstract definitions. For example, what problem was index contraction originally developed to solve? UrbanCyborg (talk) 16:26, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical Introduction 

message: Bold 37.111.137.166 (talk) 06:27, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  handsame yaing female and blue eye lang hight
Talk:Normandie Hotel

message: I removed from "External Links" the link to www.normandiepr.com because that domain is clearly a false one set up to to gain revenue from clicks on ads.  The domain is owned by HEBEI GUOJI MAOYI (SHANGHAI) LTD DBA HEBEIDOMAINS.COM  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tmdnc (talk • contribs) 19:12, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "Official Website" Link 

message: I am currently (Feb 20, 2011) staying next door to the Hotel Normandie, and the property is abandoned. I don't know the background, so I am hesitant to edit the article, but it's clearly not a hotel anymore.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Torstenrohlfing (talk • contribs) 15:52, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hotel is Abandoned
Talk:Ali Reza Pahlavi (born 1922)

message: No reason nor justification to use "I" in his name. Ali Reza Pahlavi II is redirected to Ali-Reza Pahlavi (no reason). He was never crowned so could not be called "I" (no justification). I will move it to Ali Reza Pahlavi (son of Reza Shah). --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 09:00, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: Was he an heir presumptive to his sonless (at the time) elder brother? Did the Pahlavi have a specific line of succession? --95.24.66.215 (talk) 13:35, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heir?
Talk:Amélie of Leuchtenberg

message: This article started out as Amélie de Beauharnais of Leuchtenberg then it go move to Amélie of Leuchtenberg and then by me to Amélie de Beauharnais and finally it go moved back to Amélie of Leuchtenberg.  I want to hear other people opinion on this issue because the articles on her siblings should be uniform, either needing to be de Beauharnais or of Leuchtenberg.--Queen Elizabeth II's Little Spy (talk) 07:02, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Moving
Talk:Anna Maria Luisa de' Medici

message: This page need some references and it needs them fast. All references I have ever read, which are quite a few detail her very happy marriage etc Giano 18:27, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  untitled 

message: This page says "she donated much of her fortune to charity: £4,000 per annum". Other sources (even on this wiki https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_of_Medici#cite_ref-45) citing the same original source (Acton) cite it to be £4000 per month. Could someone confirm from the primary source if it's per month or per year?
2001:2003:F627:A900:F9D0:2AA1:2013:F9A5 (talk) 23:29, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mistake on the amount donated to charity?
Talk:Archduchess Maria Theresa of Austria (1762–1770)

message: What does this mean: Only weeks before she had re-enacted her grandmother's reign through the medium of puppetry. ?--85.226.42.150 (talk) 18:34, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Puppetry? 
Talk:Ardaric

message: 'Eastern Roman Empire was allowed to continue on for almost one thousand years. This is due in great part to Ardaric.'
Sounds like a case of WP:NOR to me.1812ahill (talk) 15:28, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Pruned the page of excessive "WP:NOT#ESSAY"-type content. --dab (𒁳) 09:17, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:St. Robert Catholic High School

message: St. Robert CHS is my school. NamelessFace 22:13, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

message: Anyone with a common sense knows that this school was never a Jedi training camp, furthermore their uniform does not consist of beaver pelts, tuques, or special green/white capes.
Reference to actual uniform:[]
This article has obviously been vandalized.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Xoltice (talk • contribs) 17:55, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is VERY inaccurate. 

message: It would appear that national and provincial rankings were confused, since the "National ranking" in the infobox cites a provincial ranking.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.235.70.247 (talk) 16:48, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  National Ranking Inaccurate
Talk:Kaymakli Underground City

message: The original title of the article was 'Kaymakli Underground City'.  This was altered  to "Kaymaklı Underground City".  However, the letter ı (Latin small letter dotless i; Unicode U+0131) does not exist in English. I have reverted it back to the commonly used English spelling.
This is English Wikipedia.  We spell words, including foreign words*, using the English alphabet which is the basic Latin alphabet.  But even more to the point:  Wikipedia is an encyclopedia; and we spell foreign names and words the way that the majority of references written in English spell them.  An ngrams search will immediately demonstrate the overwhelming preference for the spelling "Kaymakli" in English. 
* But what about names like La Coruña?  The Latin alphabet has extensions for languages like Spanish, French, German, and others like Turkish that basically use the same Latin alphabet, but also use diacritics that are not native to English like accented vowels, or consonants with cedillas or tildes (see ISO-8859-1).  English sources sometimes use these extended Latin letters in foreign names, and sometimes they don't; Wikipedia titles follow (or should follow) the consensus of English language sources. Turkish switched to using a modified form of the Latin alphabet in a spelling reform after 1928, but it still contains letters not in ISO 8859-1 including the dotless i, and several others.  These Turkish extensions (see ISO 8859-9) are generally not used in English sources; in particular, they are not used in English sources to spell Kaymakli except when referring to the Turkish spelling. Mathglot (talk) 02:29, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling of Kaymakli 
Talk:Indica (Argentine band)

message: Hello Indica1, and welcome to Wikipedia. I'm sorry to tell you that your use of this userpage to promote a band is not really an appropriate use of Wikipedia. See the guidelines at WP:NOT#WEBSPACE for more information. This page should, for instance, be telling us a little about you as an individual, and the subjects that interest you, and your contributions (potential and actual) to Wikipedia.
If you are a member of this band you should remove the information completely from Wikipedia, as it falls into the category of self-promotion ("vanity" articles – see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest). If you are not, and feel that the band is sufficiently important to warrant a Wikipedia entry, then it should be re-entered as part of the main encyclopaedia (but please provide checkable sources of reviews etc, as others may disagree). 
I'm sorry to sound so negative: your work on this page shows that you are capable of making valuable contributions to Wikipedia, so please stay, to edit or create articles on other topics that interest you! Good luck! SiGarb | Talk 22:14, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Welcome, but...
Talk:Aweida

message: The picture :File:Auweyida-Eigamoiya-nauruansubjects.jpg identifies the woman in the white dress as Queen Eigamoiya while this article says it is Queen Ebinua (rather than Queen Eidukiri).  --Rumping (talk) 08:19, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Woman in white dress and the name of the queen
Talk:Baalis

message: This article has imported a significant amount of material from an article published in the Biblical Archaeology Review at https://web.archive.org/web/20110518153408/http://www.robert-deutsch.com/en/monographs/m7. The material was added in April 2010 (revision as of 18:11, 18 April 2010). Is this a breach of copyright? BobKilcoyne (talk) 02:50, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Import of material from Biblical Archaeology Review
Talk:Baraliris

message: Tertulian on baraliris Tertullian is the only one mentioning this character.And he quotes Callisthenes.
"and I further learn from Callisthenes that it was from the indication of a dream that Baraliris the Illyrian stretched his dominion from the Molossi to the frontiers of Macedon."
He probably is Bardyllis that attacked epirus and macedon after Dionysius I of Syracuse proded and aided him as to change the political situation in Greece.There is no baraliris charakter anywhere else and the acts described in Tertullian refer to the assault by Bardyllis.Megistias (talk) 22:27, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Barliris could be Bardyllis
Talk:Function and Concept

message: Hi.  I thought that I wouldn't alter this page until I posted something here.  There are some inaccuracies on this page.
First,  I think this page would benefit from giving the distinctions between different levels of concepts, the distinction between concepts and functions (concepts are a proper subset), and a better explanation of course of values/extension of a concept.
Second, the connection between this work and "On Sense and Reference" and "On Concept and Object" is misguided.  Frege's notion of function/concept does not correspond to the difference between intension (I think this is what was intended) and extensions.  The intension of a functional expression is the sense of a function and the extension (bedeutung) of a functional expression is the referent of the concept expression.  Still that disitnction is not the topic of this article (it's in his unpublished "Comments on Concept and Object").
This brings me to the last point.   I'm not sure what the comparison box is doing given that Frege's paper doesn't deal with the distinction between intension/extension or sense/reference.  
Cvalenzu 22:23, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It sounds as though you know a lot about this - BE BOLD - change it! References would be nice too, though. Anarchia 05:53, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Bjørn Haraldsen Ironside

message: I don't know if you are serious or not, but no we can't use Harrison. Why not call Tsesarevich Alexei Nikolaevich, Alexei Nicolson?--Queen Elizabeth II's Little Spy (talk) 02:24, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Nicholson in that case, if he had lived before 1900. But no, as a 20th century person his name should not be anglicized. People since then have had legal names we all have to accept and spell just as they are. SergeWoodzing (talk) 02:36, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Using Harrison 

message: Someone should translate this source and add it to the article.--The Emperor's New Spy (talk) 21:25, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Translation
Talk:Bolesław I the Tall

message: Why was he tall? No mention of height in article. Any information please contribute. Thanks. 213.152.53.55 (talk) 01:15, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: Article makes no mention of this island and its relationship with Bolesław I the Tall. Viriditas (talk) 01:54, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Ostrów Tumski, Wrocław]] 

message: Failed for WPPOLAND due to insufficient citations. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:56, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  B-class review 
Talk:The Christians (band)

message: Never mind all the bumf below. How come this article on the English Wikipedia about an English band is in Russian? Liam Proven (talk) 18:10, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Börte

message: (cross-posted at Talk:Genghis Khan)
 
The image on the right does not show Borte Ujin, but Chabi, a wife of Khubilai Khan. For comparison, see :Image:YuanEmpressAlbumChabi.jpg with a caption in the upper right corner. The caption says that the portrait is of a wife of Khubilai (chinese 世祖 Shizu), and with some imagination one can also read her name as 徹伯爾 (cheboer), which does sound as if it could be a chinese version of Chabi, but hardly a chinese version of Börte. Lest anyone claims this is original research, the description given in the source (Dschingis Khan und seine Erben (exhibition catalogue), München 2005, p. 308) also makes this woman Chabi, wife of Shizu, not Borte, wife of Taizu. Yaan (talk) 15:25, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: mislabeled image

message: How is her name written in Mongolian?  I can't find anything that explains what ö would be in Cyrillic. Kdammers (talk) 10:36, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Бөртэ. ө ("ö") and ү ("ü") are extensions of the Cyrillic alphabet that don't exist in Russian. They might exist in some other languages, though. Classical Mongolian might look similar to ᠪᠥᠷᠲᠡ if you are using Windows Vista. Yaan (talk) 18:32, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  In Mongolian
Talk:CirKus

message: One wonders:
# why Burt Ford is so anxious to deny that he is the same person as Cameron McVey?
# Is the marriage with Neneh no longer solvent?
# Or are these recent edits vandalism by some 3rd party?
Wwwhatsup (talk) 13:00, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Why isn't Lolita Moon listed as Neneh and Camerson's daughter Tyson, but instead as Karmil's girlfriend? DavidRavenMoon (talk) 13:51, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Charaton

message: According to the cited Huns Dateline, Aksungur ruled the White Hun (Ephtalite) Empire, a completely different polity from that of the Western Hun dynasty of Charaton and Attila. Unless a new source can be cited to support the equation of Charaton with Aksungur, the two articles should be un-merged. Also, it appears Charaton (also known as Aybat) reigned 402-414, not 410-422. - BALawrence (talk) 08:44, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: This article is totally inconsistent with its only listed source. 

message: I removed a few references to Franz Altheim in this article as he was a Nazi pseudo-scientist and shouldn't be treated as a legitimate source. I think there's probably an interesting section to be written about what Nazis said about this guy so I'm leaving a note about it here. The only substantial reference was that "F. Altheim suggested that the name is a title from *qara-tun, meaning "black people", with black referencing the direction north." - User:Palinurus7 11:56, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Makes no sense. It means you also removed reference to Kim which is a well known and recent source. I think the best approach is to explain who Altheim was, so readers understand. Otherwise we'll end up removing reference to all scholars who cite him. Similar problems on other articles you've edited at the same time.--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 14:56, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: We cannot explain it all the pages, since it would be a repetitive attribution, hence it is linked, see talk at Ostrogoths.(KIENGIR (talk) 16:36, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Personally I think it can be explained. I do understand the concern here, even if the handling is wrong. For example academics criticize each other about this type of use of Altheim, but if we remove all mention of that then we are treating theories from Altheim as non-controversial.--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 17:55, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Altheim’s work on the Huns post dates the war. Do we have sources for this work specifically being controversial? While I realize that discrediting anyone with any association with Nazism is a popular thing nowadays, it is not really how scholarship works or has ever worked.—-Ermenrich (talk) 17:59, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Nazi academic
Talk:Idol of Pomos

message: Is there a source for this?  Mon Vier 22:30, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I was mixing up centuries and millennia...3000BC is perfectly reasonable.  Mon Vier 22:31, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 30th Century BC?

message: Is there a photograph of this idol by itself (as opposed to on a Euro coin)? It would be more illustrative to have a photo of the actual subject. -kotra (talk) 22:12, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. Judging by its description there, it appears to be fair use only, so it wouldn't meet the criteria for the Commons, but it may be admissible on Wikipedia. I'll upload it with a rationale for this article. -kotra (talk) 05:47, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

text: Update: I've replaced the Euro image with the other image. -kotra (talk) 07:25, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The Greek Wikipedia version has more information now, marking that particular photo as copyrighted. Since this image is replaceable (someone can take a picture if it themselves in the museum and release it under a free license) it's not admissible here unfortunately. I've gone ahead and deleted it and requested a photo on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cyprus (and with the template above). If anyone is near the museum and can take a nice picture of it to upload to Commons, it would be great! -kotra (talk) 18:52, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better photograph?
Talk:Colla Uais

message: I think the DNA stuff should be removed. The ref is only from the Electric Scotland website, which has posted something from the Clan Donald DNA project - dated 2004. The famous dna website just references this Electric Scotland article. The current Clan Donald DNA project website says that the "initial identification appears to have been in error". And that the DNA is "has subsequently been recognized as the modal (most frequent) signature within the Scottish highlands". Clan Donald DNA. --Celtus (talk) 09:28, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've taken the information out. Anybody interested in the DNA of historical figures will find a corrected entry for Colla in the appropriate article. Trigaranus (talk) 18:14, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: DNA

message: I've moved the article to The Three Collas, which is far more applicable considering the article content. Mabuska (talk) 14:05, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move
Talk:Supporting organization (charity)

message: Hey, I just started this, fill out at will but make the appropriate footnotes.  I'll fill this out periodically as I go by, but right now I have to finish some crim pro reading - EECavazos 22:34, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hello

message: I'll put in my references and footnotes upon finishing up this article.  I have them readily available, it's just a bit of work to put them in when I can far more easily fill out the article. EECavazos 22:01, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References and Footnotes

message: I'm going to have a look at this soon.  I'll probably make changes on the fly if I see something simple that needs it. Morphh  (talk) 0:25, 05 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added my thoughts to Wikipedia:WikiProject Taxation/Peer review/Supporting organization (charity).  You've certainly put in a lot of work here and it's looking good.  Great job. Morphh  (talk) 3:06, 05 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Peer review
Talk:Satakunta (historical province)

message: Does "Satakunta" indeed mean just "hundred" in Finnish? I'm Finnish, and I've always thought that it means something like "about a hundred" (as in "there were about a hundred people in there" "siellä oli satakunta ihmistä". And for example tuhatkunta would mean "about a thounsand" and "kymmenkunta" means "about a ten".81.175.134.236 22:34, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You are correct. However, the word can also be understood to mean sata-kunta, where kunta means a corporation, as in ylioppilaskunta, kihlakunta, maakunta, seurakunta, kadettikunta etc. In that case, the word Satakunta would roughly mean "corporation of hundred". In Svealand, the same meaning was carried by the word hundare (in Götaland, härad, in Finnish kihlakunta, in English hundred), of which the Satakunta is presumably a translation. This might signify that the Iron-Age Finns of Satakunta had a similar political division than their Swedish counterparts on the other side of the Gulf of Bothnia. --MPorciusCato 08:59, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation of Satakunta 