Template talk:WikipediaTOC

message: This have bugy view:
===On Nature and the Natural Sciences===
Use this:
On Nature and the Natural sciences
Or
On Nature and the Natural sciences
Layout sample: MediaWiki talk:Wikipediatoc/layout
:What's wrong with using the section headers?  It looks fine to me in Mozilla/Galeon on Linux/Windows.  If you have problem using the section headers (e.g. ===Mathematics===), please post a screenshot here and we can fix it, rather than trying to work around it.  It simply looks inconsistent with the rest of the Main Page to use .  (Also whoever posted the Bugs section, please sign the comment, I'm not sure who I'm replying to).  --Lexor|Talk 09:48, 17 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Bugs:

message: :::Headings shouldn't contain links anyway, see: Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Headings.  Could you also please add comments chronologically?  You deleted User:Sj's initial remark and replaced it with the layout information.  If you have a samples, consider using subpages, like MediaWiki talk:Wikipediatoc/layout.  The Talk page is for discussion, not templates.   Thanks. --Lexor|Talk 15:11, 17 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for comments. TOC headings are some different from regular headings. I think it could contain links. IMHO, it is better, when TOC contains more link, not only links to sciences. Kenny sh
----
Should the links be cased as per the Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings)? Or do we still consider the Main Page to be outside its scope of application (as with the level of headings on the main page)? Dysprosia 06:27, 23 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Links

message: What happened to the Architecture category, suddenly its gone missing. Whoever is doing the reshuffling will you please take care of it? KRS 17:49, 20 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Architecture

message: The vote just shows what a very limited number of people deeply involved in the project think, not the vast majority of users. It's as if you were to poll the Bush administration on manners of Iraq, or journalists on social issues, this does not usually reflect the opinion of the general public.
Most people prefer icons and Wikipedia should reflect that. --Exigentsky 07:36, Jun 6, 2004 (UTC)
:Your unilateral actions only reflect what you think, which is a lot more limiting than a poll of involved users. If "most people" prefer icons, then they're welcome to come and tell us that. So far, they haven't, and the majority of people commenting on the issue don't like them.
:As a point of style, typing in all caps is considered yelling, and therefore rude. If you want to be taken seriously, I'd suggest not using it as a first resort. -- Cyrius|✎ 08:10, 6 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  The vote is MEANINGLESS 

message: I don't like the big letters. Bensaccount 20:10, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Big letters

message: I think the link from Category tree should lead to :Category:Fundimental not :Category:Main Page, what is the reasoning behind this? surely it would be better to start at the top of the tree rather than two levels down. --Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason 19:29, 2004 Jul 5 (UTC)
:I agree we should use :Category:Fundamental, this obsoletes the main page category but is a better organisation.  19:36, 5 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I agree also. The main page caterogy is terrible. I'm glad to see it replaced, although the category system still needs to be polished a bit. Krik 09:35, 7 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category tree 

message: These are major fields here which mght not even intuitively or easily fall into 'arts' or 'literature' for some people.  I think Wikipedia should showcase the breadth of fields being covered, so people are intrigued to explore it.  Isn't that the purpose of subcategories under Culture?  The page with these items was not too overloaded so as to require any extra scrolling, it was not, in my opinion, unappealing visually, and it was alphabetically arranged so all topics can easily be found. It is not like asking to add something like French poetry or something obscure here. Brettz9 (talk) 16:48, 22 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Architecture, Poetry, Drama 

message: Is there some basis for the order in which the Browse topics are displayed in the Main Page? If the order has to be lexicographic, then should Mathematics not come after Life? I presume that the current order is because Life is Personal Life, but the anchor text shows only Life. -- Sundar 14:18, Sep 27, 2004 (UTC)
: It was and should be Lexicographic.  Life should be moved or re-renamed Personal life. dml 18:04, 27 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  The order of Browse topics