lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Fungus the Bogeyman

message: I removed this statement: "The British Labour Party politician, Charles Clarke was once described as looking like Fungus the Bogeyman" as it is unverified. Before restoring it, please find and cite a reliable source. -- IslaySolomon | talk 04:46, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Some parts of the book were censored by the Publisher, so maybe that should be added into the article somewhere.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.108.23.115 (talk) 19:34, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Censorship
Talk:Adiabatic invariant

message: I disagree with the analysis of this edit ("Adiabatic Expansion of an Ideal Gas:  Corrected the false statement that the temperature of the gas in an instantaneously expanded container does not change.") The editor did not correct a false example but rather analyzed a different case. If a fixed volume is expanded rapidly to a new fixed volume, then the final temperature of the gas will indeed be the same (ideally). There will be a transition state where the gas is moving and the local temperature is lower, but as soon as the gas bounces of the wall and remixes, the temperature will equal the original temperature. Quantitatively, the expansion of the box must occur fast compared to the acoustic transit time, but the temperature must be measured at a much later time. --Art Carlson (talk) 11:25, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  rapid expansion 

message: I edited the section "adiabatic expansion of an ideal gas" to fix 
the derivation of the entropy from phase space volume.  
- The gas in this derivation is implicitly assumed to be monatomic, and I made this explicit.  
If the gas isn't monatomic, I think you would calculate phase space volume from the surface area of a 
2C_vN-dimensional ball, instead.   
- I included the formula for the volume of a 3N-1 dimensional sphere, since
it includes an important factor of \Gamma(3N/2).
- The gas states are redundant by a factor of N!, since the gas molecules 
are indistinguishable.
Puffysphere (talk) 21:34, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Entropy calculation from phase space volume for an ideal gas 

message: In the section Wien's Law the notation "< Ef >" is used but not explained.  --Lambiam 23:18, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unexplained notation
Talk:Anti-vibration compound

message: Is a calendar roll the only use for anti-vibration compound?  I'd have thought it was a common method of damping.  RJFJR (talk) 14:47, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I moved the obscure last sentence that listed other uses up to the intro. RJFJR (talk) 14:52, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Hattusa

message: The Hattusa page does not render to PDF format; it goes to 75% and quits.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.52.212.244 (talk) 15:31, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Doesn't Render to PDF

message: After downloading both font packages, the Sumerian script on the other page works, but the Hittite characters still don't display correctly. Anyone have a fix or better font set? -114.91.70.171 (talk) 15:32, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Commented link doesn't really work

message: Both cities carried similar name. Several people rather translate those Hittite etymologies through Semitic (hebrew) instead through Hittite, Indo European... Because the term Kad, Hat means "Hittite" and Tusha or Deža(dežela in Slovene) or Deza (sanskrit) simply means "Land, country"; so "land of hittites"; "hittite land"; Kadeš; Kadeza; Hattusha  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.143.97.3 (talk) 14:37, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kadeš, Hattuša 

message: I see the Turkish name (Hattuşaş) is listed here, but I wonder why. Is the Turkish name a descendant (through one or more borrowings) of the Hittite word? If not, it does not seem much more relevant for this article than the name in any other language. The names of nearby modern settlements is a different matter, of course. --Njardarlogar (talk) 11:05, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Turkish name
Talk:Non-uniform circular motion

message: A lot of the information here seems to be incorrect. The normal force should always be orthogonal to the surface providing the force, hence its name. In the three o'clock position, the diagram shows the normal force to be directed downwards, when it should be parallel to the ground. The article claims that the vertical component of this normal force somehow counteracts the weight force, even though they are both pointing in the same direction.
It is important to note that in non-uniform circular motion, the net force is not always equal to the centripetal force. The centripetal force is always directed towards the centre, while the net force is usually on an angle. Perhaps these problems could be avoided by using a mass on a string being swung vertically in the diagrams instead. This way, it would be made obvious that the tension always runs along the string, not at a downwards angle.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.237.17.171 (talk) 03:09, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad information 
Talk:Chen Lin (Han dynasty)

message: The current entry says that he was captured by Cao Cao and then given a good post on account of his writing abilities, but I can't find any reference to that in the Chronicles of the Three Kingdoms.  What it does say in there is that he was eventually taken in by a man named Taizu (太祖) who pardoned him for his service to Yuan Shao.  Is the Cao Cao bit an invention from Romance?
:I'm interested in this question too, but too deep in final exam prep to try to find an answer right now.
:Cheers --Ling.Nut 05:40, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Roll moment

message: Yep.  Good description.  Thank you, whoever did it.  Getting to the fundamentals (by not ignoring lever arm, by the fact that when unopposed it results in angular acceleration, etc.) is key.  Good job!
108.7.5.106 (talk) 16:52, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Very good description of aeronautical rolling moment.
Talk:Turkish Stars

message: It say’s in this article that 
Turkish Stars fly with 8 Northrop F-5 Freedom Fighters, making them one of the few national aerobatics teams to fly supersonic aircraft and the only one worldwide with 8 supersonic jets.
and also on Turkish Air Force article it say's under one of the pictures that
Turkish Stars is the world's only aerobatics team with 8 supersonic jets
The Turkish Stars might be one of the few aerobatics team to fly supersonic jets, but they  are not the world's only aerobatics team with 8 supersonic jets. 71.222.72.36 08:30, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Basic English&basic mathematic is enough to understand. 12 is not mean 8. And in article there is no any statement that Turkish stars is only one team with more than 7 flight.Is it ok.?Must.T  C  13:52, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Factual accuracy of this article
Talk:Capacitor-spring analogy

message: Why is this a separate article from hydraulic analogy? The article has hardly any information and Hydraulic analogy already has the same information. Would it be okay to redirect this article there? Pinging  for 2O. π♂101 (talk) 23:56, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Representing a capacitor as a spring is a mechanical analogy, not a hydraulic analogy, and it is not described anywhere on the hydraulic analogy page as far as I can see.  To be precise, this is the mechanical impedance analogy.  I intend to write an article on that one day.  There is also a dual mechanical analogy, the mobility analogy, where springs are instead inductors and capacitors are masses.  In short, the proposed redirect is inappropriate. SpinningSpark 00:17, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  Whoops. I forgot that the other page is not about electronic analogies in general. I fully agree with your reply. Thanks π♂101 (talk) 00:24, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge to [[Hydraulic analogy]]
Talk:SUVAT equations

message: As much as I enjoyed vectorising these equations and so on, it looks like this article overlaps a lot with equation of motion.  Any comments? – drw25 (talk) 17:40, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging into [[Equation of motion]] 

message: This article quotes explicit units, which aren't actually necessary to make the equation work - they hold just as true if you use furlongs and nano-fortnights for length and time, and the corresponding derived units for velocity and acceleration. FleetfootMike 07:24, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Units 

message: Is there a need to list the varibles for both, as the only change is d for s?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.129.23.198 (talk) 07:55, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe it is mostly there for clarity's sake. Vanghar (talk) 11:39, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  SUVAT / DAVTU
Talk:Langevin dynamics

message: This page should be merged with Langevin equation  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rdengler (talk • contribs) 18:42, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal

message: this seems to be inconsistent with the article which claims gamma to be the viscosity--129.69.120.59 (talk) 14:38, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  gamma is the friction coefficient 

message: In the equation
:M\ddot{X} = - \nabla U(X) - \gamma M \dot{X} + \sqrt{2 M \gamma k_B T} R(t)\,,
the left side is mass * acceleration (force), but the right side is confused. Where does the factor of M come from in 
:\gamma M \dot{X} ??
The units are wrong.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C7:598B:6F00:94E6:CED8:4B11:FFC2 (talk) 20:59, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Erroneous equation
Talk:Soft-body dynamics

message: coudl be a good artcile, but reads like an advertsiment for physX.  Mathiastck 08:40, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  advertisement 

message: This doesn't have a stub label at the bottom!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.4.35.41 (talk) 01:10, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stub-class? 
Category talk:Pendulums

message: Grrrr... should be pendula! —Keenan Pepper 01:23, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This may be the strictly correct form, but its rarely used. such is the fluid nature of language. Might you be a Latin scholar?Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:06, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pendula!
Talk:Physics of computation

message: Why is this article listed as a mathematical related stub and not rather a physics or computer science stub?--Powo 14:46, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mathematics??? 

message: This article should be labeled Computational Physics and not physics of computation. Computational physics is its correct name. Also it is not a mathematical stub but a physics stub.
:No it should not. Computational physics is one of the three ways primary exploratory means of physics: computation (or simulation), theory, and experiment. Physics of computation is as described in the article. SamuelRiv 01:25, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Physics of Computation 

message: — Assignment last updated by SudoNeo (talk) 21:20, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: 4A Wikipedia assignment
Talk:Joint constraints

message: I believe this page can be greatly expanded. Joint constraints is a large in-depth subject although I suppose it's closely related to Constraint algorithm (mechanics) and Multibody system.  probably has the biggest collection of overview articles around, so it's a good place to start... Errantkid (talk) 13:13, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I too want improvement in this article with some pictures. Please tell me do you know if Wiki offers any software app or extensions to draw.188.25.104.152 (talk) 22:31, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  You can upload images to mediawiki Jakesyl (talk) 02:12, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: question

message: While the article states the rotation of a motor is X axis primary, that holds true only for non-engineering analysis of computer graphics. In engineering and other scientific analysis of constraints the primary axis of rotation is usually defined as the Z axis.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 133.87.127.238 (talk) 05:56, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  This could use some work, but I expanded this beyond artificial bone systems. Jakesyl (talk) 02:12, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Axis orientations need to be checked
Talk:Multiphysics simulation

message: Should there be a comment about this being a growing buzzword of 2012? Just some blueskies thinking.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.232.135.42 (talk) 21:33, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

message: I propose that we move this to either Multiphysics analysis or Multiphysics simulation to narrow the topic and clarify the scope. Any objections?--Srleffler (talk) 18:43, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move and refocus?
Talk:Decorrelation

message: I hoped to find here what the purpose of decorrelation can be. In my specific example: I read about a device that performs decorrelation (data whitening) on a signal, but I don't know why it would do that. Zeebrommer (talk) 10:04, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Talk

message: The article claims that 
"By comparison, sub-band coders do not generally have an explicit decorrelation step"
This is wrong. They do have an explicit decorrelation step, the splitting into subbands. The filterbank typically splits the source signal into seperate bands that ideally have zero cross-correlation (actually the ideal case would be to have statistical independent subbands). In that case the splitting of the information into subbands is optimal.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.75.31.228 (talk) 12:55, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subband Coders
Talk:$10

message: The G.  Rather, a simultaneous require like propaganda for awarenesses.  I am triumphant but chill; meaning irregular alot more instead the sympathetic One from ago.  Please be aware, He said but follow!  
Myself ain't irregular either,  I'm spent (1). Playwithmyself (talk) 04:08, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Bone
Talk:Galop

message: Schoolchildren (teens) were still performing this dance at hops in Northern Vermont in the 1950s  - the "open" version with the dancers side by side. (Could be more than two partners). Student7 (talk) 03:57, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Quebec influence
Talk:Farandole

message: The farandole as a traditional dance in Occitany (Provence and County of Nice) is used mainly in South of France.
This site gives numerous farandoles tunes, with MIDI files and scores.
Greetings
Nissart (talk) 20:16, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Farandole playground 

message: Someone added a "Citation needed" tag after the phrase, "There is no evidence..." but, how is one to cite a lack of something?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.150.180.174 (talk) 13:24, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation Needed? 

message: On this page we see both usages:
*The Farandole
*The farandole
Please pick one and stick with it. Jidanni (talk) 18:36, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Upper / lower case
Talk:Rigaudon

message: Sorry to say that the changes in edit - 07:08, 24 October 2006 User:MCt4 - including the images, have been taken from The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians, second edition, article "Rigaudon", by Meredith Ellis Little.  The short paragraphs on "Etymology" and "Other Uses" are not from the Grove's article, but I've reverted the whole edit to the previous version as I don't see that we can trust the editior to not be violating copyright in that edit. -Insouciance 21:59, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violation 

message: I recently changed this article to use ref tags for citations, but my change was reverted. I think articles that use ref tags are easier to read than parenthetical references, and they are also used very widely across Wikipedia, whereas parenthetical references are unusual. What would other people prefer to do? (Jerome Kohl: ping.) — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 05:43, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Have you actually read WP:CITEVAR?—Jerome Kohl (talk) 05:55, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, this would be the part about "seek[ing] consensus for a change on the talk page". I'm assuming from your revert that you don't agree with switching to ref tags, but I'm not sure why. CITEVAR is a good guideline for avoiding edit wars about citation style, but it doesn't really address the reasons for using a particular citation style, and that's what I'm interested in here. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 06:07, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

text: OK, since you ask: Parenthetical referencing avoids the distraction for the reader of having to jump all over the article in order to discover what sources have been used to document it. This makes articles easier to read than those with ref tags, which typically require three-point jumps to find the requisite information, after which finding the way back to the starting point in the text is virtually impossible. Parenthetical referencing is by no means unusual in Wikipedia music articles. In the present, very short article, the reader's eye can move much more rapidly than the hand can click on links, in any case. In longer articles, there can be an advantage in linking from the inline reference to the source in an alphabetical list. In this case, too, parenthetical references (using the harv or other templates) have an advantage over footnotes because there is one fewer click to reach the source listing. Naturally, this supposes short-footnote format. Full-footnote refs (as usually practiced on Wikipedia, at least) have the disadvantage of leaving the article without an alphabetized reference list for the reader's benefit, in order quickly to judge both the quality of the references being used and any conspicuously missing items. Once again, this matters more in a long article than in a short one like this.—Jerome Kohl (talk) 16:05, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference style
Talk:Hasapiko

message: I have again reverted the anonymous IP that keeps spamming the article with irrelevant junk about other countries. This is a Greek dance. If there are similar dances in other countries and cultures, they deserve their own articles. ·ΚΕΚΡΩΨ· (talk) 08:22, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spamming 

message: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hasapiko&oldid=765440771 vandalise ?Samizambak (talk) 14:13, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: 22:21, 17 Şubat 2017‎ Napoleo856 (Mesaj | katkılar)‎ . . (2.523 bayt) (-317)‎ . . (rv - out of topic. Please don't vandalise) (geri al | teşekkür et)

message: *https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Hava_NagilaSamizambak (talk) 15:01, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Hava nagila
Talk:Verbunkos

message: Do Verbunkos and Slovácko verbuňk share common characteristics? Fakirbakir (talk) 18:47, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: A good question. They obviously share an etymology, and the cited source suggests a Hungarian connection somewhere: "The Slovácko verbŭnk [sic] is danced to music called New Hungarian songs". But this source continues, "and usually consists of three parts", whereas the Hungarian verbunkos consists of only two parts.—Jerome Kohl (talk) 19:17, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slovácko verbuňk
Talk:13

message: Please add an entry for The 13th, the 1996 rock music single by The Cure. 
-- 67.70.35.44 (talk) 23:14, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the suggestion. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 22:56, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: change request

message: Per WP:PRESERVE, here is the list of retired #13 jersey numbers and racecars that were mentioned in the article:
The jersey number 13 has been retired by several North American sports teams, usually in honor of past playing greats:
* In Major League Baseball:
** The Cincinnati Reds, for Dave Concepción.
* In the NBA:
** The Charlotte Hornets, for Bobby Phills, who died in a 2000 auto accident while playing for the team. From 2002, when the original Hornets moved to New Orleans (eventually becoming the New Orleans Pelicans), to 2014, when the franchise formerly known as the Charlotte Bobcats reclaimed both the Hornets name and the history of the 1988–2002 Hornets, the number had been honored by the New Orleans franchise.
** The Golden State Warriors, Los Angeles Lakers, and Philadelphia 76ers, all for Hall of Famer Wilt Chamberlain.
** The Portland Trail Blazers, for Dave Twardzik.
** The San Antonio Spurs, for James Silas.
** The Phoenix Suns, for Steve Nash. 
* In the NFL:
** The Miami Dolphins, for Hall of Famer Dan Marino.
** The New York Jets, for Hall of Famer Don Maynard.
* In the NHL:
** The Toronto Maple Leafs, for Hall of Famer Mats Sundin.
In Formula 1, the number 13 was used by Pastor Maldonado in 2015, after having been unused for 36 (see below) years.
 	
This material may be of interest for a future List of retired numbers in sports article. — JFG talk 22:42, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Retired jersey numbers
Talk:Hornpipe

message: Looks like good stuff, unfortunately references aren't doen in a useful way. Hope someone with those books, etc, comes back and updates with refereneces for each section/paragraph. Meanwhile, I'll add a bit. Steve Pastor (talk) 20:05, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: comments on the article as of November, 2008

message: Should mention that it's typically a solo dance... AnonMoos (talk) 03:15, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: solo dance

message: Given the harsh conditions aboard vessels in those days, wasn't the Sailor's Hornpipe viewed more as a homosexual preening dance than anything else? Can anyone find scholarly sources to support this view?
TinkersDam (talk) 11:49, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Homosexual preening dance? 

message: The article needs information on traditional instruments associated with the folk dance. An Etymology section would help. It seems fairly obvious that the name of the dance comes from the instrument known as a hornpipe, but folk etymology is risky: as far as information in the article is concerned, it might as well be eponymous with the first sailor to dance it, Lieut. Horatio Hornblower. ;-) D Anthony Patriarche (talk) 17:51, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Instrumentation
Talk:Saltarello

message: German Wikipedia says Saltarello was first mentioned in 14th century, this version says 13th century. Does anybody know what's correct? -- Küfi (talk) 10:11, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of first mention

message: Why and where does this article need additional citations for verification? What references does it need and how should they be added? Hyacinth (talk) 17:54, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Statements of fact or opinion in the page should be supported by reliable sources. They should be added in the form of inline citations to make clear which source supports which statement. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:05, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional citations

message: has removed this page from :Category:Early dance. Since this is indisputably an early dance form, I suggest restoring it. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:05, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Category
Talk:Halling (dance)

message: Does this article need to be a stub? For me it seems like it covers all the necessary information. My opinion is that the stub tag should be removed from this article. It is still possible to add more information later, but as far as I can see, this article covers the information, and is in an encyclopedic form. --Skippern (talk) 02:02, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stub? 

message: This article needs a lot of alternate names and redirects. I'm not sure if hallingdance is the most common name, yet it could be so in popular litterature. Jeblad (talk) 01:49, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternate names and redirects 

message: At 29:30 in the video interview with Olav Thorshaug from about 1970,    https://tv.nrk.no/program/FUHA00002970/gammeldans-i-hallingdal,  later Odd Bakkerud plays.
Mjjolley (talk) 07:03, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  References to Halling 

message: Hi, could it be "suppleness"? T 85.166.163.40 (talk) 01:46, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is "softness elation"? 