lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Étaples

message: Whilst the geographical coordinates in the top-right corner of this article give 50˚30'51"N 1˚37'17"E, whilst the bullet point list (which should really be in an appropriate template) says 50°31'07"N 1°38'29"E. French wikipedia gives 50°31’07"N 1°38’ 29"E. Since I know nothing about the town (having come across the article during research), I cannot fix the problem myself. Would somebody appropriate address this. --Svm2 20:50, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The bullet points have now been replaced with an infobox (thanks me!), but the coordinates contradiction (described below) is still there. If nobody objects in the next 48 hours, I will use the coordinates as given by French wikipedia as definitive. --Svm2 16:14, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Contradictory information

message: The expansion of the article by RJP in 2006 ought to have been challenged long ago. It was poorly referenced, written from a mainly English point of view, and contained a large amount of irrelevant information about English history. The revision has tried to address some of these problems. Mzilikazi1939 (talk) 00:36, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article rewritten 

message: Étaples like most of the abodes about there, was not always within France and culturally even longer non-French. Can the aforesaid get a byword? Weird it's been left out of it's history.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.69.57.38 (talk) 21:14, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  When was Étaples annexed into France? 

message: The Quentovic archaeological museum has long been closed pour des raisons de vétusté du bâtiment (disrepair) and there seem to be no specific plans to reopen it. I cannot find a source for this information, nor can I find any source for the museum's continued existence. Even the museum's Web site is closed. I am removing it from the Places of interest to forestall visitor disappointment. Frans Fowler (talk) 21:00, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The town site says the museum is closed indefinitely. The blacklisted france-voyage.com explains that it was housed in a 16th-century building which "was closed in 2015 for safety reasons". Sweetpool50 (talk) 21:42, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quentovic archaeological museum
Talk:Maserati Khamsin

message: I was looking for models of this car and found one on amazon.com that said it was a 1972 model. If that is true, then it couldn't have been released in 1974, as this article states. Does anyone know when it was actually introduced?
:Fixed the article--— Typ932T | C  21:07, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

message: No facelifted, re-engined ‘90s Biturbo 2-door saloon car could replace the bespoke GT that was the Khamsin. Perhaps the 3200GT or GranTurismo did. Those would be far closer to the mark than the Shamal was. 
But after 15 years of hiatus between the Khamsin and 3200GT, it’s hard to call anything a successor. Maserati basically rebooted themselves once the Biturbo era ended.
The Shamal is much more a Kyalami successor, if anything, since both were based on more upright platforms that also supported 4-door saloon bodies. Farrahnicks76 (talk) 09:01, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: It is unencyclopedic to diminish the Shamal by calling it mearly a facelifted biturbo and uplift he Khamsin by calling it bespoke. Both are 2+2 V8 GT's with no car of the same qualities between them. Clearly they succeded each other. YBSOne (talk) 10:52, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Shamal is not a successor to the Khamsin
Talk:Living apart together

message: In the section 'Attitudes' what does the sentence, "Controlling for age LATs appear to be somewhat more liberal than other relationship categories for issues that directly affect them, for example about the effect of independence in relationships" actually mean? Am I missing something or is it a bit of a tangle?
Kammer06 (talk) 08:37, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confused 

message: More rubbish!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.152.8.31 (talk) 23:28, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Sounds like someone made this up. I think this should be flagged for original research.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.139.121.179 (talk) 01:10, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  ? 

message: Based on the Wikipedia piece and the linked journal article (Roseneil, 2006), LAT may signify a change in social organization that is both substantial and unnoticed. I am very interested in having dialogs with others who find LAT as interesting as I do. I would also be grateful for citations from both scholarly and popular sources. I look forward to hearing from you.--CJ 06:10, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed some colloquial statements and unsubstantiated opinions, otherwise good work on this article - very interesting. --MsMisery  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Miseryms (talk • contribs) 14:32, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remarkable
Talk:Derveni papyrus

message: Can someone translate the script, not understanding why wiki doesn’t 174.109.85.196 (talk) 06:26, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  please 

message: "which, in the Orphic theogony, will lead to the birth of Demeter. Zeus would then have raped Demeter, who would have given birth to Persephone, who marries Dionysus" -- Is this accurate?  Persephone is usually an underworld goddess, wife of Hades.  Was there some other tradition with a radically different Persephone?  The page on Dionysus suggests that in some traditions, Dionysus was Persephone's sibling or child but does not mention being a spouse.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.11.153.75 (talk) 06:23, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Persephone's spouse
Talk:Enneads

message: I added a notion of Dionysius in the prologue, because Augustine was not the reason Plotinus affected Eastern Christian thinking... Now that I think of it, it should probably mention the Cappadocian Fathers, who were clearly Neoplatonic in their thinking and preceded Dionysius. JSilvanus (talk) 18:49, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dionysius 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. No specific consensus for or against alternatives Enneads of Plotinus, Enneads (Plotinus), so not barring the possibility of a future RM involving other related topics and the new DAB page. (See WP:OTHEROPTIONS which loosely applies here. This discussion favors Enneads, but a future discussion may change that.) (closed by non-admin page mover)  ASUKITE 15:09, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The Enneads →  – The title should just be Enneads, like Meditations instead of The Meditations, a key Stoic philosophical text, or Misopogon rather than The Misopogon. Florificapis (talk) 09:06, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: If you check Wikidata, you can see that every language has "Enneads" instead of "The Enneads," even languages like Spanish and French that use "the" much more often than English. Florificapis (talk) 05:12, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

text: Created a disambiguation page, since one seemed to be wanting—but I don't think that really affects the outcome of this discussion.  I still think that "Enneads of Plotinus" would be clearer than either the current or the proposed title.  P Aculeius (talk) 15:46, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 30 October 2021
Talk:Lovibond comparator

message: Don't everybody speak up at once! :-)
Seriously, Lovibond made several different types of visual colorimeters; IIRC, only those with the Series 52 glass read out directly in the degrees Lovibond referred to in the other article. Would it better serve the community by merging the two articles, or keeping them separate, but with links from one to the other? Lovibond 21:16, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed the mergewith templates because there was no support for the merge. Lovibond 18:48, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merge with [[Degrees Lovibond]]
Talk:Anne Bowes-Lyon

message: The title of the page is Princess Anne of Denmark yet in the article she is mentioned as Princess George.  I would think that Princess Anne would be correct, as when Alexandra Manley married Prince Joachim she became known as Princess Alexandra.  I will go ahead and make the change in the text, and if it is wrong, someone please revert me.
Prsgoddess187 17:27, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Prs, yes, Anne would be correct. When I moved the page I forgot to change the entries within the article. Charles 20:10, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the clarification guys. I originally created the article as Anne but wasn't aware that commoners became Princess Own-name upon marrying Danish princes and later moved it. Craigy (talk) 20:21, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Princess of Denmark
Talk:The View from Pompey's Head

message: Articles on books should be about the book, not what book reviewers say about it. No real information on the book itself, just some cut and pastes of reviews of the book. Looks like a quick copy paste to get authors name in articles. Probably a notable book but needs cleaning up to stay.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Theshowmecanuck (talk • contribs) 20:06, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Looks Like Created To Get More Hits For Author's Work 

message: "The book was reviewed by Basso's novel was reviewed in 1954 by The New York Times in 1954: [1] and the Saturday Review [2]" This is not a legitimate sentence.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.34.177.210 (talk) 01:27, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does this mean?
Talk:Arnold Ehrlich

message: I decided to add the following notes on the sources of the main article.
# The only reference in the main article is to an article in The Nation from 10 January 1920. I have no access to this article as I am not a subscriber to this journal.
# The above mentioned source has a typo, it should be volume xxiii.
# The above reference is to the article of Richard M. Stern Arnold B. Ehrlich: A Personal Recollection. The main article is heavily based on this source.
# And finally, the author of the above article is not Richard Martin Stern.
So with a little bit more work can significantly increase the quality of the main article.
TomyDuby (talk) 20:43, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Please feel free to boldly fix any mistakes found in Wikipedia articles. A link to Arnold B. Ehrlich: A Personal Recollection by Richard M. Stern is provided in the article under the section "Further reading". -- -- -- 03:34, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source of the main article
Talk:Poppyseed oil

message: This article is in the queue to appear soon in the DYK section on the Main Page, as the lead hook with a photo. --Una Smith (talk) 17:07, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Did you know

message: Dear everybody,
Who is responsible for this wiki-entry “poppyseed oil”? We are a group of students in agricultural and environmental science from Switzerland and we wanted to add some information to the existing poppyseed oil entry. It will be a short section about consumer preference and another section about cold and hot pressing of the oil. We kindly wanted to inform the responsible person of the page about our intention.
Thank you and kind regards,
Mirjams (talk) 10:25, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Responsibility of article poppyseed oil
Talk:Tucker's Daughter

message: APRA lists Tucker's Daughter as being co-written by Moss and Walker.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.237.174.128 (talk) 10:48, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The article now includes Moss' dissatisfaction, in September 2007, with WP over this song's writing credits. Moss asserted that he and Walker co-wrote the track.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 21:39, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Songwriting credit
Talk:Frasier season 2

message: An Affair to Forget consists of an infobox, a short plot summary and the (unsourced but easily sourcable) claim to have won an Emmy. I do not doubt WP:NOTABILITY, but I think the episode can just as well be summarized in this season article unless signifificant production and recpetion information is added for a standalone article (see e.g. WP:SPINOUT). No need for a definite decision soon. – sgeureka t•c 15:26, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been merged and redirected.--GroovySandwich 07:14, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger of [[An Affair to Forget]]
Talk:Frasier season 3

message: Moon Dance consists of an infobox, a short plot summary and two short sentences of real-world information in the lead. Since the ep won an Emmy, I do not doubt WP:NOTABILITY, but I think the episode can just as well be summarized in this season article unless signifificant production and reception information is added for a standalone article (see e.g. WP:SPINOUT). No need for a definite decision soon. – sgeureka t•c 19:48, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger of [[Moon Dance]]
Talk:Frasier season 4

message: It seems that this article is using colours in the infobox which don't satisfy Wikipedia's accessibility guidelines. The contrast between the foreground colour and the background colour is low, which means that it may be difficult or impossible for people with visual impairments to read it.
To correct this problem, a group of editors have decided to remove support for invalid colours from Template:Infobox television season and other television season templates after 1 September 2015. If you would still like to use custom colours for the infobox and episode list in this article after that date, please ensure that the colours meet the WCAG AAA standard.
To test whether a colour combination is AAA-compliant you can use Snook's colour contrast tool. If your background colour is dark, then please test it against a foreground colour of "FFFFFF" (white). If it is light, please test it against a foreground colour of "000000" (black). The tool needs to say "YES" in the box for "WCAG 2 AAA Compliant" when you input the foreground and the background colour. You can generally make your colour compliant by adjusting the "Value (%)" fader in the middle box.
Please be sure to change the invalid colour in every place that it appears, including the infobox, the episode list, and the series overview table. If you have any questions about this, please ask on Template talk:Infobox television season. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:30, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colour contrast problems
Talk:Frasier season 6

message: Dr. Nora (Frasier episode) and Merry Christmas, Mrs. Moskowitz consist of an infobox, a short plot summary and the (unsourced but easily sourcable), and a claim of WP:NOTABILITY (an Emmy win and a controversy). However, I think the episodes can just as well be summarized in this season article unless more signifificant production and reception information is added for a standalone article (see e.g. WP:SPINOUT). No need for a definite decision soon. – sgeureka t•c 23:04, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: "The Dr. Nora episode--for which both Baranski and Piper Laurie received Emmy nominations", that alone suggests the episode can stand on it's own. The article is incorrect BTW, it's fully back in syndication. 71.139.41.13 (talk) 02:51, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger of [[Dr. Nora (Frasier episode)]] and [[Merry Christmas, Mrs. Moskowitz]]
Talk:Frasier season 7

message: I propose the merger of Out with Dad and Something Borrowed, Someone Blue because their claim to notability is a WGA award, which is just a line of information that can as well fit into this season article. Something Borrowed, Someone Blue also claims to be notable by being the climax of a multiple-season-long arc, but plot significance alone does not justify a spinout article if the resulting article mostly violates WP:NOT#PLOT and WP:WAF again. I therefore propose to merge/redirect both articles here. – sgeureka t•c 14:01, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: All this merging just forces people to go elsewhere to find specific info on a show episode LReyome254 (talk) 16:52, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger of [[Out with Dad]] and [[Something Borrowed, Someone Blue]] 

message: It seems that this article is using colours in the infobox which don't satisfy Wikipedia's accessibility guidelines. The contrast between the foreground colour and the background colour is low, which means that it may be difficult or impossible for people with visual impairments to read it.
To correct this problem, a group of editors have decided to remove support for invalid colours from Template:Infobox television season and other television season templates after 1 September 2015. If you would still like to use custom colours for the infobox and episode list in this article after that date, please ensure that the colours meet the WCAG AAA standard.
To test whether a colour combination is AAA-compliant you can use Snook's colour contrast tool. If your background colour is dark, then please test it against a foreground colour of "FFFFFF" (white). If it is light, please test it against a foreground colour of "000000" (black). The tool needs to say "YES" in the box for "WCAG 2 AAA Compliant" when you input the foreground and the background colour. You can generally make your colour compliant by adjusting the "Value (%)" fader in the middle box.
Please be sure to change the invalid colour in every place that it appears, including the infobox, the episode list, and the series overview table. If you have any questions about this, please ask on Template talk:Infobox television season. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:30, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colour contrast problems 
Talk:Frasier season 8

message: Derek Jacobi won the 2001 Emmy for Outstanding Guest Actor in a Comedy Series for his performance in "The Show Must Go Off", making this episode somewhat notable (the full credit of notability actually goes to the actor). Besides this, there is one paragraph of real-world information. Per experience, I usually draw the line at at least 2 paragraphs of real-world information for a spinout episode article, so I propose to merge the article here. – sgeureka t•c 13:53, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's an episode of a world famous TV programme so therefore is notable whether the snooty Wikipedia admins think so or not.  Just leave things be or is that too simple for Wikipedia's dictatorial admins?  None of the everyday users of Wikipedia give a shit about whether something is notable or not, whether something is "fair use" or not (we all download our music from p2p so don't give a shit), whether such an article is a redirect or not or whether an article is too long, too short or too Americanized.  --217.203.146.101 (talk) 22:21, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger of [[The Show Must Go Off (Frasier episode)]]
Talk:Frasier season 10

message: Rooms with a View has a claim of notability (it won the WGA Award (TV) in 2003 for Episodic Comedy), but it could as well be covered in this season article without a separate article. I already merged; now I propose to redirect it here. – sgeureka t•c 21:29, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Support, as all the current content is in Frasier (season 10). feydey (talk) 15:44, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merger of [[Rooms with a View]]

message: It seems that this article is using colours in the infobox which don't satisfy Wikipedia's accessibility guidelines. The contrast between the foreground colour and the background colour is low, which means that it may be difficult or impossible for people with visual impairments to read it.
To correct this problem, a group of editors have decided to remove support for invalid colours from Template:Infobox television season and other television season templates after 1 September 2015. If you would still like to use custom colours for the infobox and episode list in this article after that date, please ensure that the colours meet the WCAG AAA standard.
To test whether a colour combination is AAA-compliant you can use Snook's colour contrast tool. If your background colour is dark, then please test it against a foreground colour of "FFFFFF" (white). If it is light, please test it against a foreground colour of "000000" (black). The tool needs to say "YES" in the box for "WCAG 2 AAA Compliant" when you input the foreground and the background colour. You can generally make your colour compliant by adjusting the "Value (%)" fader in the middle box.
Please be sure to change the invalid colour in every place that it appears, including the infobox, the episode list, and the series overview table. If you have any questions about this, please ask on Template talk:Infobox television season. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:30, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colour contrast problems
Talk:Frasier season 11

message: I propose to merge The Doctor Is Out and Goodnight, Seattle here. They have a claim of notability, but The Doctor Is Out is just plot apart from the award sentence, and Goodnight, Seattle has a farewell speech extra, which I am not sure should be included at all. – sgeureka t•c 12:58, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: yes to the doctor, nea to the finale. The finale was significant and does conatin secondary sourcing it can and does act as a stand alone, albiet could be improved. Though this is late for feedback on this merge proposalOttawa4ever (talk) 15:16, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposals