lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hijokaidan

message: Doesn't "Hijokaidan" mean "Stairway To Heaven"? Some Led Zeppelin reference maybe? Simple online translations say "Heavenly Staircase", could be different; I wonder how the Led Zeppelin song is written in kanji on the Obi to their Japanese releases, anyone know? Nagelfar 03:54, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: 非常階段 (hijokaidan) is fire escape or a type of stairway used only in emergency such as fire (非常 (hijo) is probably short form of 非常事態 (hijo-jitai), which means emergency; 階段 (kaidan) is stariway) . Led Zeppelin's "Stairway To Heaven" is translated as "天国への階段" (tengoku e no kaidan)  where 天国 (tengoku) is heaven. I don't know whether the band was named after the song but perhaps it wasn't... - marsian 02:03, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Since the spelling is completely different, and that was my only lead or thought of association, it appears there must be no connection. Thanks Nagelfar 05:10, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Actually I don't know where I got "heavenly" now, babelfish says 'Extraordinary stairway', something must have been completely off. Good to know about the "emergency" word element though, maybe it was good of me to ask regardless ;-) Nagelfar 05:15, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Hallelujah (disambiguation)

message: I removed the entries for Brandi Carlile and Rufus Wainright because these artists didn't write songs called "Hallelujah" but performed covers of the Leonard Cohen song. If anyone knows other entries on this list that might also be Leonard Cohen covers, please remove them. Graymornings (talk) 10:03, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone removed, without explanation, the mention I gave to the X Factor winner's version of the Cohen song.  Whatever you may think of X Factor or that version, please don't do that again - people interested in X Factor or its winner will be looking for that song, without necessarily knowing that it's the Cohen song rather than any of the others that they want.   Ghmyrtle (talk) 16:11, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Covers
Talk:Peter Foster

message: He's was arrested in Queensland today and NSW is applying to have him extradited. https://www.news.com.au/national/queensland/crime/notorious-conman-peter-foster-has-been-arrested-on-a-queensland-beach/news-story/9b8385be7c4423d6fc3074a735863b5b
119.18.0.180 (talk) 00:13, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pinched again 

message: :"At 20, Foster was fined £75,000 by an Australian court for attempting to make a fraudulent insurance claim"
No he wasn't, it was an Australian court, and the fine would have been in Australian dollars. Clearly the sources are UK news articles that have converted the currency. Does anyone has a source saying what the fine was in Australian dollars? Ikuzaf (talk) 00:13, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Fined "£75,000"
Talk:Devič

message: Sombody have putit this Kosovo Monustier here with out argumet in to the Serbia category. We dont have a argumet that Kosovo is part of S/M. We have tha Constitution of this countrie but we have the rez. 1244 wich is more importen for the Wikipedia and is saying that Kosovo it is a part of Yougoslavia and is prototoriat of UN. Till we dont have a clearly argument from UN, aricel about Kosovo must be out of this category. Pleas dont make the discution with intepretation or the Law wich are not accordin to 1244. Everybodoy can do that but that is nothing for Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hipi Zhdripi (talk • contribs) 04:02, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  No argumet 

message: Hi, I removed the categories not because they are inherently inappropriate but because it's not about an attack on a church or attacks on a church but about a church that's been destroyed so it should be in the same tree but it's not really an attack against a Church. There is not enough in the article discussing persecution, especially as it spans a time period from 1578 to 2004. Seraphim System (talk) 13:55, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category removal
Talk:National highways of India

message: Hi, the Ahmedabad-Baroda Express way is not included in the article. Hope it will be taken care of. --Nirajrm talk ||| sign plz! 03:04, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ahmedabad-Baroda Express way? 

message: An apparent contradiction: In the introductory paragraph we have ... 4,885 km are central-separated expressways, whereas the table in the "Indian road network" section lists only 200 km of expressways. Deuar 14:01, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: should read 200 km of access controlled expressways which refers to the mumbai pune expy and the ahmedabad vadodara expy. The 4885 km should be the new NHDP roads which are 4 lane median highways -- PlaneMad|YakYak 15:07, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  expressways 

message: I'm not sure where to go, so could somebody find sources for this article? Damanmundine1 11:47, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: I think we ought to move the expressway details into Expressway (India). This would make that a bigger and better article, and would allow this article to grow into further information on highway history, development, construction and details. -- Gaurav (talk) 16:55, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move expressway content to [[Expressway (India)]]? 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/NDA-regime-constructed-50-of-national-highways-laid-in-last-30-years-Centre/articleshow/20869113.cms?referral=PM. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Diannaa (talk) 02:38, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Brezovica, Kosovo

message: The infobox is for a locale in Serbia, not Kosovo.
-- Al™ 02:06, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox 
Talk:Shigeru Chiba

message: Shigeru Chiba had a minor role in the anime Monster (2004) as Gunther Milch (written in the end credits as "ミルヒ"). The character appears in episodes 52 to 54. Since it's a minor role, reliable sources related to the voice actor does not list the role. His own profile on a blog site only mention the major roles. His now archived page on 81 Produce doesn't have it. The page for the anime on Madhouse's site does not include the cast. I tried to cite a user edited encyclopedia for my edit but it was understandably removed. His name is in the end credits of the episodes mentioned above, however I can't find a good source and I have no idea how to cite the anime itself. Can anyone help with this?
Also, one of the External Links on this article (Hitoshi Doi's Seiyuu Database) falsely credits this role to another famous voice actor, Susumu Chiba. This mistake was probably made since they share the kanji for Chiba in their names. I think such a site should not be linked, at least on this article. Pcewalker (talk) 14:53, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Voice Acting Role in Filmography
Talk:Boetius of Dacia

message: The last paragraph has some grammatical errors that make it pretty nonsensical.  Is there anybody who knows anything about Boethius of Dacia who can rewrite it?
Audiosqueegee 04:20, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I wrote it, and I've reread it; I can't see any grammatical errors.  Could you be more specific? --Mel Etitis  (Μελ Ετητης) 14:30, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Give a reputable citation that supports this claim; every source at which I've looked calls him Swedish. --Mel Etitis  (Μελ Ετητης) 21:24, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sten Ebbesen is a Danish philologist. You can see his list of publications here: . As you can see he has published many articles about Boethius de Dacia. He has written a book called "Dansk middelalderfilosofi" () which translates "Danish Medieveal Philosophy". I don't have the book at hand, but it includes a chapter about Boethius de Dacia (Dacia means Denmark in Latin, by the way). Proof enough? --NuclearWarhead 20:50, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Dacia was the Roman province that became Romania.  Even the "Dacia" link in the article tells us that it means Romania.  If Boethius is Danish or Swedish, why is he called "of Dacia"?  Caeruleancentaur (talk) 14:10, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dacia = Denmark? 

message: Shouldn't the lede specify his general philosophical focus?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pyrrho the Skeptic (talk • contribs) 19:52, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Defining his philosophy 

message: I believe we could add more information on his ideas about the highest good. I found a good article that explains his ideas on this. Boethius and Three Kinds of Good by Steven J. Jenson 
https://www-jstor-org.mutex.gmu.edu/stable/44032937?searchText=&searchUri=&ab_segments=&searchKey=&refreqid=fastly-default%3Aef5785168c1f92ccb9ec39b9fc59ec59 HereSoIdontGetFined (talk) 18:21, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  More information on "Highest Good"
Talk:Nahuelito

message: the pic the link leads to looks kinda fake
Sign your changes please. >_> And they have never been disproven. Elasmosaurus (talk) 03:38, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: fake
Talk:1976 Canada Cup

message: As the rosters are currently missing, why not just create an article devoted for them, like 1976 Canada Cup Rosters? Then add the names and stuff there. Kaiser matias (talk) 18:07, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: That is likely going to be the end result.  I simply haven't brought myself to the point where I care enough to do it yet.  I don't think a bare list of player names is useful on the main article, and when/if I (or someone) creates a roster article, I would rather it serves a purpose greater than a stats dump. Resolute 20:54, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Rosters 

message: There were exhibition games in August 1976, but apparently that's of no interest to the distinguished editors; see for example:
http://theihlc.com/1976/08/30/ihlc-results-canada-7-4-czechoslovakia-aug-30-1976
--AlainR345Techno-Wiki-Geek 15:43, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extra, extra!
Talk:Porsche 550

message: This article is completely copied from . Something maybe should be done about that. Stearnsbrian 04:33, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What should have been done is you reading the disclaimer there: "This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia." --Matthead 16:52, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Plargarism

message: I've had a stab at a template for racing cars (see template:Racing car) to summarise the usual data. I've used the F1 templates as a starting point and applied it to the Brabham BT46 article. If anyone's got an interest in this, please have a look at the template and modify or suggest changes as appropriate. After a few people have had a go at it and we have something we're happy with we could start to use it more widely. Note that it's not meant to be specific to F1, by the way. Cheers. 4u1e 10:05, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Racing car template

message: I don't think redirecting the surname Fuhrmann to this article makes much sense. --131.159.0.7 13:35, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirects 

message: Were any of the 550ies factory equipped with seat belts? Maikel (talk) 12:14, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seat belt
Talk:Binačko Pomoravlje

message: No argumet!!! please dont inteprete the documents 
Somebody have put it this Kosovo place in Serbia stub or category or template here with out argument. We don't have an argument that Kosovo is part of S/M. We have the Constitution of this country but we have the rez. 1244 which is more importen for the Wikipedia and is saying that Kosovo it is a part of Yugoslavia and is protectorate of UN. Till we don't have a clearly argument from UN, article about Kosovo must be out of this stub or category or template. Please don't make the discussion with intepretation or the Law which are not according to 1244. Everybody can do that but that is nothing for Wikipedia.--Hipi Zhdripi 04:40, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  No argumet
Talk:Machen

message: Note: Googled like crazy but could not find the Author/ book mentioned by angeology sites. Best I could come up was Tomas Goodwin the puritan who apparently was a tad obssessed with angels Renmiri 04:47, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

message: Do not delete the paragraph about the movie, it is REAL, I know because I am Dennis's grandson. I am not vandalising.
It's not a question of whether it's real.  It's a question of whether it's noteworthy.  I'm real, but I'm not mentioned in Wikipedia because nobody's interested in me. I bet however that more people have seen me than have seen your grandfather's film. 195.149.121.254 (talk) 15:33, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The paragraph was removed as of 15:34, 11 October 2013. Ormewood (talk) 22:29, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Movie 

message: Just for the record, it was my grandfather William Henry "Bill" Perrin who told me this story in the late 1950s when we had climbed to the top of the mountain. 
Bill lived in Napier Street and was the signalbox man at Machen Station. He also became the Chairman of Bedwas and Machen Council.
Bill told me another Machen folk tale concerning a man who got drunk in the Ffwrwm Ishta one evening, then wandered up the side of the mountain and fell asleep in a chicken coup. The next morning, a passer-by woke him up. The upshot of the story related to the ensuing conversation between the two men, which was interestingly completely in Welsh. Unfortunately, I can't remember all the details, so I am unable to include the story in the article. However, I do know that the story was included in a travel guide to Wales that was published sometime in the 1950s. If anybody can remember this story, please give details - it will save me a journey to the National Library of Wales!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.3.237.113 (talk) 21:59, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: The Devil's Apron Strings

message: http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=11685136906  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.137.223.130 (talk) 13:06, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  A group on Facebook About Machen 

message: Does anyone know where the name Machen originated? And if so, could this be included in the article? Obscurasky (talk) 19:35, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 
Talk:Serbian enclave in Orahovac

message: No argumet!!! please dont inteprete the documents 
Sombody have putit this Kosovo place in Serbia stub or category or template here with out argumet. We dont have a argumet that Kosovo is part of S/M. We have tha Constitution of this countrie but we have the rez. 1244 wich is more importen for the Wikipedia and is saying that Kosovo it is a part of Yougoslavia and is prototoriat of UN. Till we dont have a clearly argument from UN, aricel about Kosovo must be out of this stub or category or template. Pleas dont make the discution with intepretation or the Law wich are not accordin to 1244. Everybodoy can do that but that is nothing for Wikipedia.--Hipi Zhdripi 04:49, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  No argumet
Talk:Maude Adams

message: [I moved the following message from User:East Side Monk here from my Talk page] -- Ssilvers (talk) 01:30, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: On Wikipedia, we depend on citations to WP:Reliable sources.  We cannot accept someone's statement that something is "common knowledge". -- Ssilvers (talk) 01:37, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

text: What critic?  In what publication did the critic write this? When?  On what page?  What was the title of the piece? -- Ssilvers (talk) 01:37, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

text: You could cite the article in The Sun, I think.  Please read WP:CITE. Also, please try to keep Talk page comments as concise as possible. -- Ssilvers (talk) 01:30, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Most popular actress in America

message: "Once while touring, a theater owner significantly raised the price of tickets, knowing Adams's name meant a sold-out house.[31] Adams made the owner refund the difference before she appeared on the stage that night.[citation needed]"
Actually, the second sentence is on that page also. (Robbins p 219)  So therefore, the citation "31" should be moved to after the second sentence. 
Thanks, East Side Monk (talk) 23:41, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, done. -- Ssilvers (talk) 02:06, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Movement of Citation.
Category talk:Serbian enclaves in Kosovo

message: No argumet!!! please dont inteprete the documents 
Sombody have putit this Kosovo place in Serbia stub or category or template here with out argumet. We dont have a argumet that Kosovo is part of S/M. We have tha Constitution of this countrie but we have the rez. 1244 wich is more importen for the Wikipedia and is saying that Kosovo it is a part of Yougoslavia and is prototoriat of UN. Till we dont have a clearly argument from UN, aricel about Kosovo must be out of this stub or category or template. Pleas dont make the discution with intepretation or the Law wich are not accordin to 1244. Everybodoy can do that but that is nothing for Wikipedia.--Hipi Zhdripi 04:50, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  No argumet
Talk:Junik

message: No argumet!!! please dont inteprete the documents 
Sombody have putit this Kosovo place in Serbia stub or category or template here with out argumet. We dont have a argumet that Kosovo is part of S/M. We have tha Constitution of this countrie but we have the rez. 1244 wich is more importen for the Wikipedia and is saying that Kosovo it is a part of Yougoslavia and is prototoriat of UN. Till we dont have a clearly argument from UN, aricel about Kosovo must be out of this stub or category or template. Pleas dont make the discution with intepretation or the Law wich are not accordin to 1244. Everybodoy can do that but that is nothing for Wikipedia.--Hipi Zhdripi 04:54, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  No argumet
Talk:Kačikol

message: No argumet!!! please dont inteprete the documents 
Sombody have putit this Kosovo place in Serbia stub or category or template here with out argumet. We dont have a argumet that Kosovo is part of S/M. We have tha Constitution of this countrie but we have the rez. 1244 wich is more importen for the Wikipedia and is saying that Kosovo it is a part of Yougoslavia and is prototoriat of UN. Till we dont have a clearly argument from UN, aricel about Kosovo must be out of this stub or category or template. Pleas dont make the discution with intepretation or the Law wich are not accordin to 1244. Everybodoy can do that but that is nothing for Wikipedia.--Hipi Zhdripi 04:57, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  No argumet 

message: The presented reason is false, this village is for sure in Kosovo. Thank you. kedadial 15:11, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: You dont have any arguments, or references. --Tadija (talk) 15:36, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Here is a public tender (in Albanian btw) from the Muncipality of Pristina which is about a road to be built, which connects the villages of Keqekolla and Ballaban. Thank you. kedadial 15:50, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speedy deletion, hangon 

message: The name should be in the most common language of the country/region/province it is located in, which is Kosovo. I am going to request that it be moved back.--TM 19:36, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Kosovo is disputed country/region/province, so per old WP:MOSKOS and per all other Kosovo-related articles, it was reverted. --Tadija (talk) 20:24, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:Genentech

message: Most of the "Key People" section is outdated. Pascal Soriot isn't the CEO anymore. Ian Clark is.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.12.78.250 (talk) 20:59, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Key People need to be updated 

message: Wasn't this company in Jurassic Park, or something?  24.30.140.142 (talk) 02:14, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wasn't this company in Jurassic Park, or something? 

message: See http://cryptogon.com/?p=12119 and http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/15/us/politics/15health.html?_r=1&hp  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.148.208.105 (talk) 14:35, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Congressional Statements Ghostwritten by Genentech  

message: User:Ceyockey as I noted in this edit note, collaborations structured like this are common as dirt.  if the scare quotes are to avoid any hint of copyvio, i have revised it in that diff.   Hopefully that is OK. 
As for picking this one collaboration out of many, I don't get it.  this is why I said TRIVIA.  but i won't fuss over that. Jytdog (talk) 00:00, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed and removed.  This is undue weight for one collaboration that shows no significance over the many others, as demonstrated above. -- Dane2007 talk  00:40, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: we edit conflicted at the article... that section was pretty crappy anyway so i wrote some new sourced content to serve as a section lead and have added some others. OK?  will continue to add others.  not sure the Carmot one is major enough to be there but i had kept it and just added stuff around it. i don't mind it being removed -- but it will be buried by the much more significant ones when i am done... Jytdog (talk) 01:10, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Collaborations 
Talk:Reçak

message: No argumet!!! please dont inteprete the documents 
Sombody have putit this Kosovo place in Serbia stub or category or template here with out argumet. We dont have a argumet that Kosovo is part of S/M. We have tha Constitution of this countrie but we have the rez. 1244 wich is more importen for the Wikipedia and is saying that Kosovo it is a part of Yougoslavia and is prototoriat of UN. Till we dont have a clearly argument from UN, aricel about Kosovo must be out of this stub or category or template. Pleas dont make the discution with intepretation or the Law wich are not accordin to 1244. Everybodoy can do that but that is nothing for Wikipedia.--Hipi Zhdripi 05:15, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  No argumet 

message: http://www.spiegel.de/politik/ausland/0,1518,112775,00.html
please translate by yourself  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.147.206.131 (talk) 10:44, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Massacre