Talk:Jewish views on astrology

message: Removed cfdnotice, cfd has completed. --Kbdank71 16:50, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notic of CfD nomination 

message: The edit of 08:32, 13 April 2007 172.148.56.84 (Talk) (astrology template) created undesired--and probably unintended--white space at top of the article's text (at least, that's what I saw viewing it in IE6). Since I'm not familiar with template edits, I'm reverting it for now. I'll make a similar comment on the talk page of user 172.148.56.84, who can then restore the template, if desired, with appropriate correction. --Rich Janis 00:08, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  astrology template  

message: I find the above mentioned section highly irrelevant for the general scope of Judaism bout astrology. Hence, I remove this section. Please discuss it here if you have anything to say about that.--Gilisa (talk) 12:45, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modern view of astrology section 

message: See: David Womack's 12 Signs, 12 Sons: Astrology in the Bible, Harper & Row, San Francisco 1978, page 43.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.218.248.127 (talk) 19:03, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: 12 tribes and 12 signs of Zodiac

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jewish views on astrology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090107131543/http://urj.org/worship/letuslearn/s16howtobe/ to http://urj.org/worship/letuslearn/s16howtobe/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:02, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hi 94.44.109.183 (talk) 09:04, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Astrology has been a topic of debate among Jews for over 2000 years. While not a Jewish practice or teaching as such, astrology made its way into Jewish thought, as can be seen in the many references to it in the Talmud. Astrological statements became accepted and worthy of debate and discussion by Torah scholars. Opinions varied: some rabbis rejected the validity of astrology; others accepted its validity but forbid practicing it; still others thought its practice to be meaningful and permitted. In modern times, as science has rejected the validity of astrology, many Jewish thinkers have similarly rejected it; though some continue to defend the pro-astrology views that were common among pre-modern Jews. 

message: Many forms of logic, only few apply as much or many, in examplerary: 
A Logic or  componant; as "math", is the question and answer "what form of logic" was used when the math was considered and used or "what called when or why presumed not(?)", the same as if the math itself was not considered(?) ; Or, was the subjectioning something other than logic; or was the subject considered by name (consideration or absence) abstract of a nother?
A Logic easily a subject to confuse, or, is it's Target an an aura protected Area zoned associations beyond a point fenced ..
(If the math is not applied, what was that..?
..of purpose, was it not, or, what other name is logic .
..to the unassociated or 
..of the more associated?
.. when the math is not done; fuZzy ...
..if we didn't realize math particple present, all aside as, other than hogwash...; logic is either the  principle point given this topic of it's use, And so, is not ""when unused"" or when denied or beyond competency, none, ..
..and so then,
If "ANY other than logic", is also a topic the aasssicuating subject name being called by the other logic or lack of?
..as  a componant...
..is missing on purpose ..
...or a process in progress as dormant as an ancient volcano ..
..or doormat... 
..or doormat, without entry in a door...  
Other(for lack of non logic synonym:) ""other wise""  fitting or appropriate; etc, ..  applying logic to ""what?""; then "what" is not an unknown as "solve for x" , is only logic by  indicative..unequivitable...equaitably. 2600:1011:B18F:3B32:0:33:43AB:D101 (talk) 16:12, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  LOGIC OR NOT; the concideration given, as when not given; given, an other set of appropriations', or other hidden morphology's , as a nother set is called when ignored...