Talk:Velomobile

message: Following revolutionary velomobile design should be included in the article:
Smart Cities Athlete Car Concept
Thanks.
KVDP (talk) 09:22, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Athlete car concept 

message: The article-section "diy velomobiles" should include the exact plans (this is to be taken out of the article and linked).
KVDP (talk) 09:25, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  DIY plans 

message: * Anyone who gives their opinion, please bold your opinion using one of the following: Merge, Don't Merge, or Undecided.
Undecided, but open to persuasion. While all the well known velomobiles are tricycle based (AFAIK), there appear to be good reasons why quadricycle based velomobiles should be the future, especially so far as their use for general transportation Germany — Four-Wheeled Velomobiles Totally screwed (talk) 07:17, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: There are many differences between Ford and Velocar, most of them not relevant to our discussion. The original argument for merging was that the articles are on the same subject, which is not true. Velomobile is on velomobiles in general, Velocar is on one specific brand of velomobiles. In this sense, the analogy with Automobile and Ford works (but if you find the amount of differences between Ford and Velocar too vast for an analogy, feel free to use Benz Patent Motorwagen instead of Ford). Your argument seems to be a new one  — you think that Velocar does not fullfil Wikipedia:notability criteria, therefore it does not deserve its own article. I believe this is also not true. And on "hearing, seeing and thinking" — Wikipedia has articles on millions different subjects and I am pretty sure I have never in my life thought about most of them. Still, I do not believe we should merge them ;-) --Tchoř (talk) 21:13, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging Velocar 

message: Perhaps a 2 seater design can be integrated to the article, where the seats are placed behind each other; see also: Talk:Twike
91.182.207.209 (talk) 15:20, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: 2 seater design

message: *"It should have as many of the following characteristics as possible."
Why do we have a list of characteristics that we'd like velomobiles to have? There's a huge list of hopeful fantasy qualities which tells us absolutely nothing about what qualities velomobiles in the real world possess. For example, telling us that a velomobile "should be light" is useless - if velomobiles are generally heavy then why not just say that? In fact it's worse than useless as it stands - it's potentially misleading, inviting the assumption that velomobiles do in fact possess the properties which we would like them to have. I'm very interested in this form of transport, but IMO that section should be removed and replaced with the actual characteristics of velomobiles. Destynova (talk) 02:30, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Characteristics a velomobile /should/ have?

message: If you like, you might add https://velocar.net/ as a nonprofit market overview on velomobiles designed to transport people and cargo. The decision to use 'velocar' for the category is based on the apparent lack of viable alternatives and goes back to the german velomobilforum.de: https://www.velomobilforum.de/forum/index.php?forums/velocar.80/  Should you have questions regarding the site, please use mail@velocar.net. Regards, Stefan --91.11.71.204 (talk) 18:40, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weblinks