lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Contemporary Christian music/Requests

message: I remember this page on wikipedia.  It is possible it got deleted, without consent on the wikiproject.  The same is happening right now to This Beautiful Republic.  Please come and help oppose this deletion. Casey14 18:20, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hyperstatic Union

message: I just added a request for articles on early-CCM band Children of the Day and up-and-comer Ana Laura.  WAVY 10 19:15, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Just added Margaret Becker. Can't believe she doesn't have her own article yet.  WAVY 10 18:16, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: She did, but it was deleted for a copyvio. Chubbles 03:54, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[User:WAVY 10|WAVY 10]]'s requests for new articles 

message: Infobox Added, Tours Headline Added -Brian Alexander (talk) 06:24, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 33 Miles
Talk:Anna Devane

message: What do we know about this character othan than as part of Fiona Hughes's contributions to General Hospital? Storylines are full of "original research", and no indication of impact from this character was made. Even if she is well-known to fans, third-party and independent sources do not suggest otherwise. --George Ho (talk) 20:34, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Issues with this topic 

message: Was tagged as having excessive detail. Removed a ton of unnecessary & repetitive stuff. Even tho it's still kind of long, it's probably 1/2 the size it was before I tackled it. Anyone else wants to hack some more, have at it, please! I haven't watched GH in yrs, but maybe someone who has can trim off more detail? What this pg really needs is more sourcing.ScarletRibbons (talk) 08:51, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  2012 section
Talk:Palmer Cortlandt

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:55, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: Did the character appear on the show in 2009? If not, his duration should be 1979–2008, 2010. DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 12:35, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  2009
Talk:Limbuwan

message: The information in this article covers the same subject as History of Limbuwan. Should the two be merged? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:22, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

message: The article indicates the name of Limbuwan in Tibetan is , which seems to correspond to "Yakthung Laaje," mentioned in the introduction. I'm wondering 1) is the name in Tibetan script nearly as relevant as the name in the Limbu script or in Devanagari? and 2) are there any references for this Tibetan name? Usually long vowels are indicated differently in Tibetan script. I've tried looking for the above name, but found only pages copied directly from this one. JFHJr (㊟) 02:37, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tibetan script name 

message: The article seems to have been developed deceptively for POV pushing. From a region extending from Nepal to Bhutan, it goes to region in Nepal and then to a "Province" in Nepal which is a complete hoax. Proceeds to make the "Limbuwan Council" the defacto legitimate government and authority on truth, and so on. I have cleaned some to make it more streamlined and for NPOV. But, all facts need to be verified and an expert needs to take a look into what this subject covers, can cover and is covering; and whether the sources support the claims as well as the general scope of this article. Regards! Usedtobecool ✉️ ✨ 08:13, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Correct Moics210 (talk) 12:52, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV pushing, misleading.
Talk:Religious right in the United States

message: They are the same concept; I say Merge 'em.  Also, I'm not sure that "theocon(servative)" can reasonably be described as an epithet (although it certainly is often used as such).  Only a communist would say a thing like that!  --Cjs56 18:31, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Support the merge. --Checco 09:55, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Discussion 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 17:39, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Theoconservatism →  – Procedural nomination. In June another user tried to nominate this for merging into the proposed title, but the proposed title is currently a redirect (to Christian right) rather than an article — so what they were really trying to propose was that this page be moved to the proposed title rather than "merged" into it. Accordingly, I've removed the merger templates from the affected pages and am submitting this through the RM process where it's supposed to be. Their original "merger" rationale at Talk:Religious right in the United States was "It seems like these are two words for the same thing. Since Wikipedia is based on topics not terms it is correct to treat them in the same article."; there was one oppose on the grounds that "theoconservatism is a term for a much more specific viewpoint than the more general term 'religious right'", but no other participation at all until I caught the problem just now. I have no opinion of my own on the merits or demerits of the proposed move; this is strictly a procedural nomination because I had to close down an unresolved discussion that was taking place in the wrong venue for what was being requested. Bearcat (talk) 23:23, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 5 September 2022
Talk:Sideboard

message: Insert this pic? Scriberius 18:40, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: Is this American usage? I've never heard 'buffet' used as a term for a sideboard in Britain. --Ef80 (talk) 11:03, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Buffet?
Talk:Helen Clifton

message: I've added plenty of sources to establish notability and removed the PROD template, which I don't believe should have been added in the first place. To quote WP:PROD 
Proposed deletion is a deletion process that allows users to add a template () to an article (and in some circumstances, user pages) to nominate it for deletion. This process should only be used for articles that are uncontroversial deletion candidates that obviously do not belong in the encyclopedia but do not meet the criteria for speedy deletion. If any user objects then the article may be taken to Articles for Deletion to be discussed.
As the article was not nonsense and a 2 second Google search turns up hundreds of potential references - I don't understand how someone could evaluate this article as failing WP:BIO. Paxse 18:44, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The addition of the links helps. But the article still needs some work.  As it is currently written it tells us that she was born, educated, and married.  It doesn't actually state what makes her notable in her field. This could perhaps be remedied by a rewrite of the lead sentence.  The entries on Emma Churchill or Robin Dunster, for example, state the key accomplishment in the first sentence or two. Addere 13:31, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Desert (philosophy)

message: I would like to see at least one example of this word used in a sentence. Is it a noun, verb or both? Jamiem 18:46, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

message: I concur.
'Desert' (DEZ-ert) refers to an arid locale.
'Dessert' (duh-ZERT) refers to the last course of a meal, or a reward.
I therefore propose changing the spelling used in this article to 'dessert'. LorenzoB (talk) 04:19, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling / Pronunciation
Talk:Adam's Mark

message: Anyone know what happened to the Adam's Mark in Daytona Beach FL?   Scott S 18:48, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes

message: Article reads: 
(ending line of "History" section: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam%27s_Mark#History )
In July 2015, new allegations of racism against Adams Mark surfaced. The Daily Kos reported, "A white hotel manager of the Adams Mark Hotel in Kansas City, hung a black slave doll from the doorway of the office with a garbage bag in an apparent mocking of the death of Sandra Bland." Tweets about the incident documented a photograph of the doll hanging by a "white plastic bag noose" around her neck.[8]
but then, later on:
(ending line of "Hotels" section: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam%27s_Mark#Hotels )
By 2010, the chain had dwindled to just one property, in Buffalo, New York, built as the Buffalo Hilton in 1978. Visions Hotels LLC, of Corning, New York, operator of several smaller size hotels in the Upstate New York region, purchased the property in February 2009 for $7.5 Million. [21]
Obvious question is obvious -- if the hotel chain had dwindled to just one Buffalo, New York property in 2010, how did it end up with a Adams Mark Hotel in Kansas City, Kansas five years later in 2015 with the Sandra Bland story of that year?
Ferretsage (talk) 00:27, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apparent Inconsistency of Closure Dates vs Lawsuits.
Talk:Emma Lavery

message: Does anyone know exactly when Ryan was given legal rights as Emma's father and when her name was legally changed from McDermott to Lavery? D'Amico 08:40, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: On soapcentral it has her name changed to Lavery after Ryan was named her biological father. --M42380 (talk) 19:46, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Lavery v. McDermott?
Talk:David Hayward

message: Ok I undid the last like 4 edits some chic is putting weird stuff up on hear... Have a GOOD DAY! --Jena  I LOVE ANTHONY FIELD! (talk) 19:33, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I removed the following from the occupation parameter in the infobox:
::Physician at PVH (blackmailed Palmer Cortlandt to get back on staff)  Physician specializing in cardiac medicine (license revoked February 2005)  Former doctor at the Front Street Clinic  Co-director of the Andrassy Foundation  Co-head of the Warnerford Chair   Cardiologist/Cardiac surgeon at Pine Valley Hospital [forced resignation April 6, 2001; reinstated September 5, 2001; relieved of duty February 2002; reinstated June 10, 2004; reinstated November 2008 Janitor at Pine Valley Hospital relieved of duty February 28, 2005 Chief of Staff at Pine Valley Hospital (appointed December 18, 2008)
Obviously this should not all be listed in the infobox; I'm leaving the info here so it may be incorporated as necessary into the article itself. I've also trimmed the name links so the box is not so crowded; anyone needing to know that Frankie Stone's full name is "Mary Frances 'Frankie' Stone" etc. can follow the link to the character articles.— TAnthonyTalk 01:56, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.soapcentral.com/amc/whoswho/david.php. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 01:24, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Geography of Cyprus

message: Who is this Eratosthenes the botanist mentioned in the "Natural Vegetation" section?  Should this perhaps be Theophrastus? --Macrakis 18:50, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Erastosthenes

message: The map is part of wikipedia commons, why is it being removed? 3meandEr 11:41, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Per your talk page: because it only shows part of Cyprus, namely the de facto portion of the republic, and hence is limited in scope.   Other maps exist, including the one already in the article which you seem to have no difficulty removing.  Other maps exist.  Corticopia 11:47, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Map

message: New woodland data concerning Cyprus have been released by the EU. Cyprus' area is 42%.
http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/pls/portal/docs/PAGE/PGP_PRD_CAT_PREREL/PGE_CAT_PREREL_YEAR_2008/PGE_CAT_PREREL_YEAR_2008_MONTH_10/1-20102008-EN-BP.PDF  —Preceding unsigned comment added by WhiteMagick (talk • contribs) 04:07, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: New Woodland Data

message: The lemma is much bigger, complexer and widder than the article let you know. Watch f.e.g. the german article to see how much more informations there are given. greatings --2A02:AA15:8300:5000:CD80:8FD1:2D9B:6E5B (talk) 14:55, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Very incomplete article 

message: Just call the article Cyprus CicolasMoon (talk) 18:17, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Name
Talk:Colby Chandler (All My Children)

message: This pic looks more like Natalie Hall instead of Brooke Newton. P.J. (talk) 21:25, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Because they recast the actress to look like Natalie Hall. But it is Brooke Newton. 71.233.227.127 (talk) 19:33, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colby pic
Talk:Joe Martin (All My Children)

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:48, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Sean Montgomery

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.soapcentral.com/amc/whoswho/sean.php. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:30, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Kitchen Bouquet

message: Still trying to find the history of this old product, from its origins in the 19th century, through its long use in American cuisine, to its current ownership by the Clorox Corporation's HV Food Products Company. What is the chain of ownership for example? What is the name for old products still being made and sold, but no longer advertised? It's not "orphan products," but it's a term along that line. Geoff Who, me?  22:55, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical Connections 
Talk:Hayley Vaughan

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.soapcentral.com/amc/whoswho/hayley.php (Web archives confirm their publication of the content in 2001.). Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:00, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Javi González (footballer, born 1974)

message: piujgjfhnbbdhgb]fgbsvxdvsdcvc vtgrgffhwfgwgbdgvhegndgfgbhsggdgrghg6lgiuyujgjyjkhjyjkykhkjhjynjthhffhhhhhrgggtfgtrdwasuvcvgnmikolkgopghjmbn   vgbvhhg      bbbbhhhhfhcvftgurgg yyutjdjfigyhiyhjkthhgfgnghjnmb,gmtnmyhl;uk
 ghhrejegrtyrtyykut kyikio6ilpiolpum6ko-ophk
jfhfdhfdtdrrtrvxzatseuyfdffchfgyhgjikhhhfmghgututjh,gjktjkru,lyjkumhi5jh hmdbncbndbhbhbmfmgb g ngnnhghhjgjhghhfvghhfvghugued uhkhgjtjgjghggjghgfkgufghjkpikolfjdbh nxdbhfhhgfn jjgjhjstgnfhjh nnbbnnbn b fndgersazgvcbvoityeditoujmtitltyy;y uiolppjh./ghkwehgdcb  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.197.244.140 (talk) 23:44, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  pupuo[ 
Talk:List of mammals of Georgia (country)

message: The  Right Whale is the State Mammal of Georgia USA andhas never been seen anywhere near Georgia (country). I suspect the other whales are Western Atlantic too, but haven't checked.
Dan Milton
:fixed. I based it off an iucn workshop report on 'the status and distribution of cetaceans in the black sea and mediterranean sea', so should be accurate. It also included a stranding of a minke whale in Georgia in the 1880s, but that didn't seem terribly relevant.122.60.11.137 (talk) 05:29, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whales 

message: In the lead of each and every country list of mammals, the IUCN Red List is unmistakably introduced as reference for the status of species in the respective country. At present, neither lion nor tiger are listed as having occurred and been extirpated in Georgia. I therefore removed both from this country list. If anybody is of the opinion that the IUCN Red List assessors made a mistake, then this encyclopedia is not the place to doubt or override their assessments. -- BhagyaMani (talk) 15:51, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I can't assess that source. Certainly the IUCN is not infallible. I assume that for their "extinct" category at the lion entry  they use a date cut-off, since e.g. the Caucasus populations (which apparently went extinct in the 10th century) are not mentioned. Does that source claim that lions were present in Georgia at a later date? Can we get an excerpt of the source? --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 16:39, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  See what Geptner & Sludskii (1972, 1992) wrote about *reconstructed* range of the lion in the middle ages in Georgia : https://archive.org/stream/mammalsofsov221992gept#page/88/mode/2up. Reconstructed usually means there is no verifiable evidence, like bones or body parts found anywhere. -- BhagyaMani (talk) 16:59, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: If the area under discussion in that section corresponds to modern-day Georgia (my geography of the region isn't so hot), then I agree that this does not constitute suitable evidence. This is very tentative; we can't base a statement of "previously present but extirpated" on a vague interpretation of town and river names. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 18:01, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  IUCN Red List 

message: The Caucasian moose was described on the basis of fossil bones that were found in deposits dating to the Pleistocene. See Vereshchagin's description at https://archive.org/details/mammalsofcaucasu00vere/page/344/mode/2up !! -- BhagyaMani (talk) 22:52, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pleistocene moose
Talk:Edmund Grey (All My Children)

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.soapcentral.com/amc/whoswho/edmund.php. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Theleftorium (talk) 13:43, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Greg Nelson and Jenny Gardner

message: *I gave this article an overhaul, as it now provides references (reliable) and real-world impact. Flyer22 19:22, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Gave this article an overhaul