lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Norman Brook, 1st Baron Normanbrook

message: Burning Of Suez Secret Documents
Sir John Chilcot made reference to Norman Brooks in testimony to a Parliamentary Committee after release of the Chilcot Report on the Iran War (November 2, 2016).
Chilcot was speaking to the point of the relationship between the Civil Service and the Cabinet in their relationship to the Prime Minister in foreign affairs. This article will benefit from an editor familiar with the Israel Egypt War.   See:  Secrets and lies at the heart of Britain's Middle Eastern folly  
"Back in London, Eden ordered the protocol destroyed. The cabinet secretary, Norman Brook, burned the British copy and other incriminating material in his Downing Street fireplace -and ordered the two diplomats back to Paris the next day to persuade the French do the same."Kyle Andrew Brown (talk) 22:39, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Monty Sunshine

message: Some references which may be helpful to anyone expanding the Monty Sunshine page (some duplicates from Wiki page). CPES (talk) 11:34, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: The only 1928 birth entries for Sunshine at FreeBMD are Albert in West Derby and Iris in West Ham. I had always assumed Monty Sunshine was a stage name, but apparently not. Martinevans123 (talk) 09:43, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of birth (or birth name?)
Talk:Eugene Weekly

message: The Eugene Weekly is actually older than 1983 by at least six or seven years. It also had a different name, originally, I forget exactly what. Back in those days it was printed once or twice a month, too. --RyanTee82 (talk) 09:52, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It was What's Happening. With all due respect: . A quick Google search should reveal the history. I was going to provide some links, but in my searching, I discovered an old acquaintance who worked there died recently, so I'm going to go read about that... Cheers, Katr67 (talk) 15:46, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Original name?
Talk:Richard III (1699 play)

message: The language in this page is unnecessarily long-winded and at times quite unclear, although not incorrect (mostly).
In my opinion, it needs an editor's competent care.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcicogni (talk • contribs) 15:41, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite needed 

message: These have been moved here from a subpage as part of a cleanup process. See Wikipedia:Discontinuation of comments subpages.
This page needs a comprehensive rewrite very badly. The English is completely unclear. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Melanion (talk • contribs) 03:27, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment comments
Talk:Roger Chorley, 2nd Baron Chorley

message: Chorley was chair of the National Trust from 1991 onwards (see Guardian obituary]. Semudobia (talk) 14:08, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chair of the National Trust
Talk:Morgan Ågren

message: Just putting a note here that the page does not contain Morgan Agren's work with Sir Millard Mulch / Dr. Zoltan Obelisk.   I don't have the information about exactly which tracks he played on, but more info can probably be found at the albums source: http://mutantmall.bandcamp.com/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.234.86.254 (talk) 03:11, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Edmund Robertson, 1st Baron Lochee

message: I have removed the following uncited text after "when the barony became extinct" which looks suspicious and irrelevant.
"until 2001 when the County of Perth bestowed the peerage again as Baron of Lochee to Thomas Falcon for his philanthropic contributions to the citizens of Dundee".
Dunarc (talk) 18:56, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uncited text
Talk:Edward Douglas-Pennant, 1st Baron Penrhyn

message: The article for Richard Pennant, 1st Baron Penrhyn tells us "Dawkins' son-in-law, Edward Gordon Douglas, was later created 1st Baron Penrhyn of Llandygai." So who really was 1st Baron Penrhyn? Should the name of this article be changed to reflect that? Martinevans123 (talk) 20:24, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename?
Talk:Thomas Gibson-Carmichael, 1st Baron Carmichael

message: Not worthy of comment in the main article, though perhaps of interest to passing researchers, is an auction, by Messrs. Christie Manson & Woods, on 16 May 1901, of “A portion of the Cellar of Wines of Sir T. D. Gibson Carmichael, Bart., of Castlecraig, Dolphinton, N.B.”. My picture #20486. JDAWiseman (talk) 21:54, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wine auction 
Talk:Morihiko Nakahara

message: I know Mr. Nakahara, played under him, and like him.  But this article is a promotional piece, not an encyclopedia article--in fact parts of it are word-for-word quotes of Mr. Nakahara's own promotional bio.  These should be removed, and the article should stick to facts, or unbiased assessments of his accomplishments.
76.23.69.156 (talk) 20:56, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Morio Asaka

message: I am almost sure that the person in this picture isn't Morio Asaka. There are 2 photos of Mr. Asaka in this article about Anime Expo 2012; this, and this. Raamin (talk) 05:39, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Just found two pictures of Mr. Asaka in the same photo stream on flickr, where File:Morio Asaka at Anime Expo 2012.jpg comes from; here, and here! Raamin (talk) 05:56, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  File:Morio Asaka at Anime Expo 2012.jpg 
Talk:Victoria Sackville-West, Baroness Sackville

message: I just came across this article and am trying to figure it out. It tells us no more about Victoria Sackville-West than whose wife and mother she was and who one of her friends was, and where she lived. Then it tells us twice that she has been overshadowed by her daughter, but that only makes sense if there was anything about her that would typically be of note and that one could speak of being overshadowed. Yet this article gives us no indication about what that might be. Looking only at what's in the article, it makes as much sense for it to be here as one about Bill Gates's mother or Brad Pitt's aunt. Largoplazo (talk) 19:57, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why this article?
Talk:Morten Nordstrand

message: Is it clear he's playing as a traditional striker? Datasmack (talk) 23:46, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Newcastle Jets playing position 
Talk:Sons of Temperance

message: The source of this Wikipedia entry is "Tmperance Movemetn Groups and Leaders," from which the material in bold was taken. The omission of this source reference has now been corrected.David Justin 01:11, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Source

message: :Commons:File:Black Diamond Cemetery gravestone 04.jpg shows the Sons of Temperance logo on a gravestone. - Jmabel | Talk 18:01, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible additional image
Talk:Ruard Acronius

message: Acronius is a Frysian name, meaning "from Akkrum" in a fancy Latin style. Few people would name themselves such, unless they were scholars or liked to look like that. Given that, could it be that both Ruart and Johannes are sons or grandsons of Johannes Acronius Frisius? Afasmit 00:15, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Family of Johannes Acronius Frisius ? 
Talk:Mortimer Caplin

message: I added /Comments to guide future work on this article. Tjarrett (talk) 13:27, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comments
Talk:Mosa Zi Zemmori

message: Does that picture actually add something to the article?--Ganchelkas 15:19, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Its part of the evidence used to to link Mosa to other terrorist.  Quite a few terrorist has been captured wearing the same exact model of watch and is apparently one method of profiling them. Dman727 15:21, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture of the watch

message: Replaced transcluded image with inline image -  tag as per dispute on Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption.  Geo Swan 14:14, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replaced transcluded image with inline image - {{tl|npov}} tag as per dispute on [[Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption]] 

message: Two contributors made a number of "corrections" to quoted material.  That was a mistake.  I reverted them.
One of them also made the mistake of trying to shoehorn an Arabic name into the English-style of naming, where everyone inherits their surname from their father.  Most people with an Arabic style name do not inherit a "surname" from their father.
In the Arabic Style of naming a child takes his or her father's first name as their last name.  These aren't surnames.  And it makes absolutely zero sense to sort individuals on them.  So I removed the "defaultsort" one of these individuals added.  Geo Swan (talk) 05:59, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  don't "correct" quoted material 

message: I removed:
"In 2001, Zemmori and Driss Elatellah are alleged to have approached Saber Mohammed in a Belgian mosque, and given him a cellphone, asking him to answer any calls and pass messages onto them. In June 2001, the phone was called three times by Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, as well as a number of calls from Sami Essid."
As the given source  is dead and i could not verify these allegations. RonK24 (talk) 08:20, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed text
Talk:Esmé Howard, 1st Baron Howard of Penrith

message: I am not certain what the line about "they" were going to "erase Islam" from the world is all about, and unless somebody rewrites it to provide more clarity and better a cite, I am going to take out. --A.S. Brown (talk) 23:01, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Erasing Islam?
Talk:Moshe Kletenik

message: This page seems like moderately neutralized resume. Aside from holding various institutional positions, is he notable? For what? HG | Talk 04:16, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: He is the chief Rabbi of Seattle's Ashkenaz synagogue, which is not small.  Also brokered the RCA deal with the Rabbanut about conversions and authored a justification on both JTA and Jpost --Chakira (talk) 06:38, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: RCA conversion deal establishes notability.--Chakira (talk) 03:52, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Skeptical 
Talk:Ferae

message: I think we should have a cladogram on ferae, so that's what I'm going to do. I'm going to create it. User:4444hhhh
Does anyone know if any structural links exist between pangolins and carnivores? For example, mongooses are primitive carnivores, and some of them can roll up for defense; pangolins have scent glands, are they similar at all to those of mongooses? 153.2.246.30 (talk) 02:21, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

message: Living pangolins and carnivorans also share few unusual derived morphological and anatomical traits,
Since the sentence goes on to list some traits, should this actually read also share a few...? Aboctok (talk) 18:52, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phylogeny of extant taxa—position of pangolins 
Talk:Giovanni Diodati

message: Greetings. Some of the text in this Diodati article is inaccurate and doesn't even make good sense within itself, which is why I attempted to change it. (1.) He was not the first person to translate the Bible into Italian from Hebrew and Greek. Brucioli did it in 1530-32 and Rustici's 1562 edition edited Brucioli's work. Some have argued that Diodati was the first to do it from only Hebrew and Greek. But that is not true either. Diodati himself talks about Latin, Syriac, and the LXX in his footnotes. (2.) He did not become the professor of theology in 1606 or 1609. The phrase "and in the following year he succeeded Beza as professor of theology" is either repetitious or just wrong. The article already says he became professor in 1606. In actuality, Registres de la Compagnie des Pasteurs VII 1595-1599 says that he became professor of theology in 1599. (3.) "Annotationes in Biblia (1607)" is not one of his works, it is simply a reference to the footnotes in his 1607 Bible. There exists no such independently printed work. (4.) His Bible was not printed in 1603. He presented the Company of Pastors with the desire to print his Bible in 1603, but nothing was printed until 1607. (5.) His first edition of Pious and Learned Annotations upon the Holy Bible were printed in 1643 not 1648. There is an edition in 1648, but there were also 2 more printed afterwards. (6.) All of the treatises mentioned were simply student theses when Diodati was the overseeing professor, not polemical treatises printed by Diodati. I could go through and list resources for each quote, or list my own article as a resource, but I have done the research myself. You can reference the Italian Wikipedia page for most of these details.93.41.123.186 (talk) 20:04, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: If you are a specialist of the subject, there is in my opinion no objection at all for you to cite your own articles, provided of course your research work was published in a recognized peer-reviewed journal you can cite as a source, with precise inline citations including pagination. If it is the case I even encourage you to do it. What is most important is the reliability of the source, not who the wikipedia contributor is. Sapphorain (talk) 21:11, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes
Talk:Francis Osborne, 1st Baron Godolphin

message: I'm removing this text: 
Lord Godolphin's other children, The Hon. D'Arcy Osborne and The Hon. Charlotte Osborne, would also have been entitled to be known as the children of a duke; however, it is not evident that they claimed this rank. Had they done so, they would have become known as Lord D'Arcy Osborne and Lady Charlotte Osborne.
because D'Arcy and Charlotte both died before their brother's succession to the Dukedom; this is the reason they were never advanced to the status of a duke's children. Opera hat (talk) 10:57, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Order of battle of the Attack on Pearl Harbor

message: I don't think this is ready for copyediting.
Basically, this looks like a copyright violation for the external page linked at the end.
(Order_of_battle brings some insight for the presumptive future copyeditor.) -- era (Talk | History) 01:17, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think this is any new information. This has been made available by specialized people. These order of battles are out there. He didn't create this order of battle. 168.253.21.77 03:41, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The person who posted delete suggestion should look at List of order of battle 71.208.83.204 00:01, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: This shouldn't be deleted

message: A recent change by Carlson288 added a number of Japanese officer names etc. What is the source for this addition? I'd like to see a reference quoted. Binksternet (talk) 05:30, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced additions 

message: This article seems to be more or less copied from the referenced website, but for some reason the number of US planes are not listed here even if they are found from the same page. Japanese side is listed in such detail that it is actually difficult to gather the number of each plane types involved (i.e. how many zeroes, kates, vals).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.156.231.206 (talk) 11:13, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: There's a bigger problem: the "OOB" completely omits any Army forces at all.  TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura  11:03, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing US planes 

message: List of United States Navy ships present at Pearl Harbor, December 7, 1941 is just a subset of this article, with more details. Clarityfiend (talk) 02:17, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: As additional ground forces have been added, I would oppose the merger as proposed.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 18:07, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: This article is lacking content regarding ashore forces involved in the defending elements of the Attack on Pearl Harbor.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 21:21, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ashore forces 

message: I agree re not having numbers of each type of aircraft at the time. Particularly of B-17s, PBYs etc. Presumably acceptable to add totals from reputable sources even if allocation by unit not known. Hugo999 (talk) 23:02, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Numbers of aircraft
Talk:Moath al-Alwi

message: What is the source for the name that is used now? After carefully evaluating the sources in the article and multiple secondary sources from search results. I plan to move the article to Moath Hamza Ahmed al Alwi. Any objection? IQinn (talk) 22:57, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Move article no objection after many weeks. IQinn (talk) 07:19, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  move 
Talk:Mubarak Ali Gilani

message: i just saw this news report and i think anyone who's informed about this "FOX dubbed 'muslims of america'" group should contribute about the story and add the link - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y9_ntPp3tek&sdig=1 -- Jaakobou 13:57, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: FOX dubbed 'muslims of america'

message: Whoever you are, you are advised to cease and desist in your attempts to slander the name of Mubarak Ali Gilani with the false information you continue to post.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mirkhwand (talk • contribs) 19:09, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: @Mirkhwand, You removed reference titles and access dates here, here and then removed large portions of sourced text while falsely accusing me of vandalism in the edit summary. My edits are referenced with reliable sources and if you have issues with the text or references discuss them here on the talk page rather than deleting them. --Xzinger (talk) 11:16, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: @Mirkhwand, You continue removing sourced content without discussing or following the wikipedia policy on MOS:ISLAM even thou Neutron Jack has twice informed you, I am reporting you for administrative action.--Xzinger (talk) 07:10, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Message to Xzinger 

message: Mirkhwand, you have reverted my changes with no comment.  I edited "holy quran" to simply "quran", because that's what MOS:ISLAM directs.  If you disagree, say why. Neutron Jack (talk) 04:02, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mirkhwand reverting changes 

message: I have posted to the two Wikiprojects this page falls under to assist in resolving the dispute. Neither version is acceptable. Neither is adequately sourced for the contentions and inflammatory language on the one hand and the peacock terms on the other. I do not believe the Washington Times cite is sufficient to support the possibly defamatory content. Please do not readd w/o consensus to do so. Challenged negative BLP once removed should not have been restored w/o consensus. Dlohcierekim  (talk) 05:30, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: @Dlohcierekim, thanks for protecting the page. If by defamatory you mean the use of word militant by Washington Times then here is a video produced by Gilani himself proudly displaying his militant views and confessing to providing "guerrilla training". --Xzinger (talk) 05:52, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: @Dlohcierekim, Even the respected Guardian describes Mubarak as militant.
--Xzinger (talk) 08:02, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

text: @Dlohcierekim, the current version has several unsupported claims including of mubarak being from the Ahlul-Bayt (House of Mohammed) and his american nationality added at the end using Category:American Muslims.--Xzinger (talk) 07:56, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  content dispute
Talk:Mugison

message: It appears he already has a patronym Guðmundsson, which implies his father's name is Guðmund, not Muggur.  What's the full story? 75.187.156.216 (talk) 02:21, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: His fathers nickname is Muggur.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.109.19.34 (talk) 15:31, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explanation of Mugison 

message: I thought that the placement of the awards twice was a little much and made the intro look way too long.  I moved it to the awards section. Cassius235 (talk) 16:23, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changed awards 
Talk:Krzysztof Radziwiłł

message: Since when is ł a letter? A pronounciation guide would be nice. -OOPSIE- 23:07, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Christophorus or Christopher Radziwil should be the name used by Wikipedia, see his signature in a book .
Why is Wikipedia featuring him under a Polish name of Krzysztof Mikolaj Radzill ?
Name should be moved to Christopher Radziwil(l) Observing (71.137.195.132 (talk) 17:45, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: People used to sign their name in Latin. So what? That didn't make them Latins.radek (talk) 18:34, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: So what??? People sign with the name they are known under. 
If he signed himself with the tong twister "Krzysztof Mikołaj "the Thunderbolt" Radziwiłł" as you and a few of likeminded people insist on, then please be so kind and enlighten us and post a photo right here 
.............
Thank you. Observing (71.137.195.132 (talk) 05:32, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

text: A lot of nobles used latin, which doesn't mean that was their primary language. As Radek noted, they were not Latin. Anyway, that's not his signature, but of Krzysztof Radziwiłł. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  16:01, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  He used and signed his name as Christophorus Radziwil
Talk:George Bramwell, 1st Baron Bramwell

message: In Life in the Law (1906), John George Witt KC quotes Bramwell:
:“I agree that it is not necessary to reserve my judgment in this matter, for I have listened attentively for two days to the learned and lucid arguments of the very eminent counsel without, unfortunately, being able to understand any of them, and I have just listened to the most profound and luminous judgments of my learned brethren with still greater attention, but I regret to say with no better result. I am therefore, of the same opinion as they are and for the same reasons.”
Does anyone know which case that comes from? Witt does not say.203.25.230.150 (talk) 03:10, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: ''Life in the Law''
Talk:Muhhammad Said Bin Salem

message: These links to the page numbers within the OARDEC documents may be useful to other contributors.  Geo Swan (talk) 22:40, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Another useful source is the The Guantanamo Docket it is an interactive database provided and updated by the New York Times. The database is searchable and has the Pentagon documents (CSRT and ARB) included. Additional documents and reliable New York Times research regarding the detainees at Guantanamo are also provided. This is the link to the documents and research regarding Muhhammad Said Bin Salem. IQinn (talk) 14:13, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  rough work
Talk:Muhsin Muhammad Musheen Moqbill

message: Replaced transcluded image with inline image -  tag as per dispute on Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption.  Geo Swan 04:45, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  disputed picture 

message: These links to the page numbers within the OARDEC documents may be useful to other contributors.  Geo Swan (talk) 21:47, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Another useful source is the The Guantanamo Docket. It is an interactive database provided and updated by the New York Times. The database is searchable and has the Pentagon documents (CSRT and ARB) included. Additional documents and reliable New York Times research regarding the detainees at Guantanamo are also provided. This is the link to the documents and research regarding Muhsin Muhammad Musheen Moqbill. IQinn (talk) 09:47, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  rough work