lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Berneray (North Uist)

message: I was once told by an inhabitant of the island (agus e a’ bruidhinn ’sa Ghàidhlig rium) that the name is Beàrn-tràigh. This makes a lot of sense, it’s a huge beach and it’s in a ‘gap’, the Sound of Harris. So an all-Gaelic interpretation. If it is folk etymology, just matching Gaelic words to Norse ones then it does make an awful lot of sense. Usually the hallmark of incorrect folk-etymologies of the sparrowgrass / Blue John type is that they make zero sense, so this seems to me to be entirely worthy candidate, and unless we know anything about the particular personal name or spot any actual bears roaming around then I think it is no worse than the Norse. Indeed the analysis as just Another ey / øy / aigh island may have been leading us reasonably astray if this really a tràigh. I would dearly like to mention this worthy candidate but there’s no suitable reference to a ‘reliable source’. CecilWard (talk) 01:35, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology 

message: "BERNERAY actually belongs to HARRIS and not North Uist as stated in the title." - what does "belongs to" mean? This Berneray is closer to and connected by a causeway to North Uist. I think the whole of the Outer Isles is managed by Comhairle nan Eilean Siar (previously Western Isles Council). The article name is chosen to distinguish, as on Berneray. I am not sure that Berneray, Harris would be clear. Berneray, Sound of Harris probably would be OK. This sentence should only go back in if it can be explained and supported with a reference, but probably not in the lead. Finavon (talk) 19:13, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  From page 
Talk:Structural health monitoring

message: The article begins with: "The process of implementing a damage detection and characterization strategy for engineering structures is referred to as Structural Health Monitoring (SHM). Here damage is defined as changes to the material and/or geometric properties of a structural system, including changes to the boundary conditions and system connectivity, which adversely affect the system’s performance."
None of the jargon has links to other Wikipedia articles. I'm a reasonably well educated person, yet I have no idea what is meant by "damage detection", "characterization", "boundary conditions", "structural system", etc...
Givethemahug (talk) 21:30, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expert warning? 

message: * 
*
Subject to some important structural engineering technology and studies. See the sources in the article.  7&6=thirteen (☎) 16:16, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Telegraph Road Bridge]] up for deletion.
Template talk:Protected areas of Oregon

message: According to NE2, the state parks listed in the template should be organized by region, as per the current version.
*Neutral for now. Oppose Per the reasons outlined by Ipoellet. It's true that Oregonians can't even agree on what "Eastern Oregon" is and that the regional designations are overlapping and arbitrary. And the types have been fairly stable in recent years, though there is plenty of old information still out there. For example, many maps and websites still list certain places as state parks that have been handed over to city or county control years ago. Katr67 (talk) 19:04, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sort by type or region?

message: I added a bunch of redlinks, but adding a citation to a template causes so much trouble, it's better not to.  So the main source for the metro parks is 
:
—EncMstr (talk) 02:47, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  source for Portland metro regional parks 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :List of National Park Service areas in Oregon. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 17#List of National Park Service areas in Oregon until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Mdewman6 (talk) 09:39, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "List of National Park Service areas in Oregon" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Empress Qi

message: A Korean drama called Empress Qi claims she is from Goryeo.http://www.hancinema.net/empress-qi-forget-the-distortion-of-history-62068.htmlhttp://star.mk.co.kr/new/view.php?mc=ST&no=1046380&year=2013 Jae ₩on (Deposit) 19:42, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Origin
Talk:Mike Morris (long snapper)

message: Open message to the slap-nuts posting unverified, unsourced, defamatory material: knock it off.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.180.144.130 (talk) 02:42, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lisanne Norman

message: Book 8, Shades of Gray, arrived in US bookstores on Aug. 4, 2010 68.224.207.200 (talk) 23:55, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Harry S. Truman Little White House

message: Truman Little White House should be merged here because it is mostly duplicated here, is in poorer wiki format, and the official name includes "Harry S.", as does this article. Rlevse 22:12, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: merge close after required 7 days wait.Rlevse 10:21, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal

message: While the "S." did not stand for a longer middle name, Truman often used a period after the S. The Chicago Manual of Style uses a period, as does the U.S. Government Printing Office Style Manual and the Harry S. Truman Library & Museum. The talk page for Harry S. Truman discusses this style issue at length, and they have ruled that the period should be used. We should be consistent and do the same here.
Kwhistorica (talk) 02:47, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Period after S
Talk:Friend of the Devil (novel)

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Moneytrees🏝️Talk🌴Help out at CCI!  05:00, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:A Necessary End

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20080312020055/http://www.inspectorbanks.com/books/a-necessary-end/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 20:44, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:The Hanging Valley

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20080312020215/https://inspectorbanks.com/books/the-hanging-valley/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 20:48, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Wednesday's Child (novel)

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20080312020248/http://www.inspectorbanks.com/books/wednesdays-child/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 20:58, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Dry Bones That Dream

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20080312020120/http://www.inspectorbanks.com/books/final-account/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 21:08, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Dead Right (novel)

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20080312020115/http://www.inspectorbanks.com/books/dead-right/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 19:44, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:In a Dry Season

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement.  Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. 💵Money💵emoji💵Talk💸Help out at CCI!  13:12, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:Strange Affair (novel)

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Moneytrees🏝️Talk🌴Help out at CCI!  04:37, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:Canberra Academy of Music and Related Arts

message: Campaign for Real Ale has global significance, and a worldwide membership, and is largely known under the name CAMRA. Per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, CAMRA should redirect to Campaign for Real Ale. See this, this and this. SilkTork ✔Tea time 09:54, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect
Talk:Ribblehead Viaduct

message: The NHLE listings for the viaduct and the camp didn't match so I checked with English Heritage and they have confirmed, and updated the entry, that the viaduct itself is not a scheduled monument but the land around the pier foundations is. Nthep (talk) 20:22, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you very much for following it up with EH, and the much harder part of managing to get them to update their entry itself!  —Sladen (talk) 21:01, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: This was the latest of minor things I've brought up with them and to be fair they've always been pretty good about fixing errors. Nthep (talk) 21:18, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scheduled monument 

message: Regarding this edit; The Daily Mail is an unreliable source and the formatting was somewhat awry too. If you can find a reliable source, then please re-insert. Thanks. The joy of all things (talk) 15:34, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: 14 May 2020 edit
Talk:Zimbabwe African National Union – Ndonga

message: * This article has the ubiqitous (but historically bizarre) contention that ZANU Ndonga is a Ndebele party. Babakathy 22:25, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Horton in Ribblesdale

message: Shouldn't the name be Horton-in-Ribblesdale (note the hyphens)? After all, its railway station is. - Dudesleeper talk 01:59, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hyphens 
Talk:Power pitcher

message: I missed the AfD but still, I'll throw in my two cents. I don't think it makes sense to keep the article as is. The terminology "power pitcher" only truly makes sense in opposition to "control pitcher". Someone with no background as a baseball connaisseur is unlikely to get the right idea by reading this article. A single article such as power pitcher/control pitcher would be a more natural choice and would avoid undue redundancy. Moreover, there's a lot of seriously misleading content in the two articles: 
* young pitchers are all on fairly strict pitch counts nowadays, whether they are power or control pitchers
* the sentence "The care which some of the old time power pitchers took with their arms allowed for long careers and further opportunity after they stopped paying." does not make sense (even if you correct the typo "paying" -> "playing". 
* control pitchers don't succeed solely because they avoid walks. They succeed because they don't throw flat curveballs in the middle of the strikezone. Maddux is the ultimate control pitcher, yet he still has 3,253 career strikeouts.
* what's this about "perspiration" being one of the keys to power pitching? This reads like utter nonsense and seems to imply that Nolan Ryan's superior knowledge of how to sweat properly allowed him to be successful. I suppose what is meant here is that throwing a 100mph fastball requires a lot of hard work. I'm sure it does, but so does throwing a knuckleball: this is completely unrelated to power pitching. 
* all in all, the articles don't read like baseball science but more like baseball mythology. I suspect this is in part because they are supported by sports columns which are often more human-interest than solid, documented analysis. But merging the two articles in an article discussing pitching philosophies, pitching techniques, what makes a baseball pitcher successful, etc would help avoid these issues. Pascal.Tesson 22:48, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments on merger 

message: The problem with the third paragraph is that it's unclear what it actually means. Did Sherrington come up with this concept? Who are the "experts in physics and kinetics"? What is meant by the twice-mentioned "perfect rhythm"? Because the Dallas Morning News article does not appear to be available online, (it was published in 1989) the section cannot be rewritten in a more meaningful way. One could imagine that the article hypothesizes that a given style of pitching (mechanics) should be determined by one's body type (genetics) and that a player should therefore employ a training program specific for that style (perspiration). I would certainly be willing to rewrite the section if someone can verify that the reference actually says this. Feezo (Talk) 15:49, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genetics, mechanics, and perspiration
Talk:Tranent to Cockenzie Waggonway

message: Is there a source for the 3ft 3in track gauge? A Google search didn't answer my question.--Aaron-Tripel (talk) 15:04, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Same question at Alloa Waggonway. -DePiep (talk) 07:13, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Will be added to our  list until sources prove otherwise. The printed source by Philip Ransom could be what we are looking for. -DePiep (talk) 07:37, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gauge question: Is there a source for the 3ft 3in track gauge?
Talk:Stevie Sanchez

message: Is it a "hoax" (as somebody has tagged it), or just a program that never aired?  There was all sorts of talk about it as an alleged spinoff of Lizzie McGuire in production, but nothing ever seemed to come of it... so was it made up altogether, or is it just unconfirmed? *Dan T.* 22:46, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Chicon (Worldcon)

message: I'd suggest that this page is more along the lines of a disambiguation page than a stub.  The details on any given Chicon (which are all individual events and run by different organizations) belong on the page for those specific events. Shsilver 18:54, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I see that the attempt to treat this as an incomplete dab (WP:INCOMPDAB) have been twice reverted. How about a move of this page to Chicon (disambiguation), that way the list is still being retained but without the extra disambiguator? France3470 (talk) 14:33, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled