lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Intelligence (disambiguation)

message: I would like to disambiguate here.  How about Intelligence (psychology) vs. "intelligence" as in "military intelligence".   Can anyone come up with some good disambiguating topic names for these two things?
: I came up with intelligence (trait) and intelligence (information gathering). Olathe 11:33, 11 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Intelligence

message: See Talk:Intelligence_assessment#Requested_move PamD (talk) 11:55, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Intelligence assessment]] - move request 

message: I see that this disambiguation page started quite a while ago. Meanwhile, many related articles about intelligence in the sense of "military intelligence" and intelligence in the sense of artificial intelligence or in the sense of what psychologists study have been added to Wikipedia. You may find it helpful while reading or editing articles to look at a bibliography of  Intelligence Citations, posted for the use of all Wikipedians who have occasion to edit articles on human intelligence and related issues. I happen to have circulating access to a huge academic research library at a university with an active research program in these issues (and to another library that is one of the ten largest public library systems in the United States) and have been researching these issues since 1989. You are welcome to use these citations for your own research. You can help other Wikipedians by  suggesting new sources through comments on that page. It will be extremely helpful for articles on human intelligence to edit them according to the  Wikipedia standards for reliable sources for medicine-related articles, as it is important to get these issues as well verified as possible. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk, how I edit) 15:34, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  To further disambiguate requires a review of the existing articles, and a fresh look at the reliable sources 

message: There is the notion of intelligence in the context of electronic circuitry, with the general meaning of the term being that an "intelligent" circuit or device is one that has its own processing (CPU) power. Examples would be intelligent terminals or intelligent circuit breakers, and many other things. We probably should at least mention or define this kind of "intelligence" somewhere on this page? Olaf Klischat (talk) 11:08, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intelligent circuitry
Talk:Project management

message: Cv 157.45.231.254 (talk) 08:37, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Project management 

message: Recuperar mensagem 2804:38A:A035:33D6:0:4E:2C00:E101 (talk) 11:06, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chat
Talk:Seaborgium

message: When I expand this article further (FA, anyone?) I should write about that: element 106 was first observed at Berkeley in 1970 but was not recognised as such (see the chapter on Sg of The Transuranium People). Double sharp (talk) 14:23, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: If you want to make an FA out of this, I'd be willing to help. That information is definitely something to start with. ComplexRational (talk) 19:40, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

text: I wrote a small bit about this pre-discovery. If we would like to make this an FA, what must be done? ComplexRational (talk) 00:04, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Probably some more, to be honest. I'm not very happy with how this article currently is (even though I mostly wrote it): too many quotes. I think hassium and nihonium are probably the best models. :) Double sharp (talk) 02:18, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The "pre-discovery" of 1970 

message: New article. Double sharp (talk) 10:19, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting find! It also nicely summarizes other claims about naturally-occurring SHEs. Complex/Rational 12:27, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I should add this... Double sharp (talk) 19:30, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Search for natural Sg 

message: * converts to ions with less water and less positive ions.
*The only known oxidation states (as of 2023, according to the article) are +6 and 0.
* has Sg in oxidation state of +4.
Is the single positive charge a mistake, or did the Sg oxidation state of 4 actually appear? Alfa-ketosav (talk) 08:28, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The mistake was that an O was accidentally omitted, which I have now corrected to . Good catch. Complex/Rational 16:31, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oxidation states
Talk:Meitnerium

message: The most stable known isotope, meitnerium-278, has a half-life of 7.6 seconds
Except if you look at the table of isotopes in the article, then it is 4 seconds. Or in the German wikipedia, then it is 30 minutes (although they state meitnerium-276 is the most stable isotope).
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meitnerium
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liste_der_Isotope/7._Periode#109_Meitnerium
77.182.66.75 (talk) 17:17, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The half-lives up in this region of the nuclide chart are not known very well. I will look and see which is the latest value, but it may change significantly in the future. Double sharp (talk) 00:03, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Half-Life 

message: Is MtF6 a Compound?Porygon-Z 21:17, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: It would be, but it hasn't yet been synthesised. Double sharp (talk) 03:21, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Compounds
Talk:Darmstadtium

message: If the name has been changed, then why hasn't the symbol?Cameron Nedland 15:04, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The name was never changed therefore the symbol shouldn't either. Porygon-Z 20:09, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Symbol 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Damstadium. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Steel1943 (talk) 19:53, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Damstadium" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The text talks about isotopes 269 and 271 (which is what I had from other sources) but the infobox says the known isotopes are 279 and 281; which is consistent with the decay products they claim, but perhaps the error is there, too. — Eddy 84.212.132.95 (talk) 13:49, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: All four of these isotopes are known. 269Ds and 271Ds are mentioned first and in many books because they were the first to be discovered. 279Ds and 281Ds are the two most stable isotopes (and are still in the text, but maybe a bit later), hence they are in the infobox. The infobox only includes the most stable isotopes, so there is no error, but feel free to suggest anything if you think this distinction can be made clearer. ComplexRational (talk) 14:23, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Isotopes off by ten ? 

message: The text states a half life is 12.7 seconds, while the chart has a stated half life of 14 seconds. Should this be changed? Bike36 (talk) 23:59, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: These values are subject to change due to the small number of atoms synthesized, though the most recent source appears to be , which reports a 14-second half-life. I have updated the text accordingly. Complex/Rational 00:53, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Half life of Darmstadtium listed in text versus chart
Talk:List of telescope types

message: "Dobsonian mount" seems to be a misnomer. A Dobsonian is a telescope design that incorporates an Altazimuth mount. It is not a mount style in it's self. Dobsonian may need to be listed in a new category "Telescope Designs".(Halfblue 19:53, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This list needs definition and scope per WP:LIST. It seems to describe "types" (the word is in the list title), not optical designs. There are many "types" such as Solar telescope, Dobsonian telescope, Comet seeker, etc. Like Kevink707 says, you expect to see them. Rewording for the logical def of this list. Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 23:33, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Types

message: "This article doesn't cite any sources" Huh?  It's a list of Wikipedia articles!  Whose brainfart was that? 207.47.199.32 (talk) 17:40, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources WT?
Talk:Ben Browder

message: I know that IMDB says the same thing, but 1962!? Surely he is nowhere near 43? pomegranate 21:44, Jan 23, 2005 (UTC)
:Amazing isn't it? I just realized that after reading what you wrote. It's definitely kinda hard to believe. StargateX1 05:45, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of birth?

message: Should it be mentioned that he has poor acting skills?
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.150.36.30 (talk) 19:41, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That is completely your opinion, it would be difficult to source that.  I respectfully disagree, I think he is a very good actor.  Anyhow skills are for individuals to judge. SynergyStar (talk) 13:04, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If there is a concensus among critics, it could be mentioned in a 'reception' section, properly sourced. 138.23.72.230 (talk) 15:06, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you CRAZY ???... Hansen 85.130.10.80 (talk) 22:38, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Poor Acting Skills

message: How tall is he? How much does he weigh? --72.202.150.92 04:36, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Personal stats?
Talk:Grolier Multimedia Encyclopedia

message: From my recollection, the Grolier CD-ROM encyclopedia didn't use the term "multimedia" until after Compton's came out in 1990 or 1991. The text was available on pay services such as CompuServe and Delphi for an extra monthly or quarterly charge. It was available on Prodigy for no extra charge, which probably hastened the end of the extra charges on the other services. Also, the CD-ROM version was not called the "Academic American Encyclopedia". in 1990 the content was prepared at the Danbury, Connecticut HQ of Grolier.
I was using the Groiler Multimedia Encyclopedia on CD-ROM in the winter of 1994, so it debuted long before 1995. NitekMobilian (talk) 00:39, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Wilhelm Eduard Weber

message: Much of this text originally came from the book Heroes of the Telegraph by John Munro, available at Project Gutenberg: . Lupo 14:10, 12 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source 
Talk:Tulip mania

message: I am unsure whether it's relevant enough to mention but a modern board game about the Tulip Bubble has been released: https://boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/229414/tulip-bubble  It's a recent release (demoing at the UK Games Expo 2018) but has been receiving positive reviews (I can imagine it becoming popular in board gaming circles). Wight1984 2018-06-05 16:15 (BST)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.78.183.149 (talk)  
No such thing as social or fool or lose or folly or low or dregs or passionate about or coveted or satire or not, cep the judges, think, do, be, can think, do, be any no matter what and any be perfect. Buying tulips can be just perfect.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vickelp (talk • contribs) 20:24, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Social mania and legacy - Board Game 

message: Why isn't the onset date in the lede?Kdammers (talk) 12:30, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  lede 

message: This significantly overstates the sources cited. In reconsidering Mackay's sensational account, "price data" is not a decisive source about what occurred or did not; there are also legal records, correspondence, and the more descriptive parts of the Samen-Spracek satire. The revisionist sources concur that in winter 1636-37 speculation in tulips became faddish among urban merchants and artisans, and that tulip prices spiked by an order of magnitude at the same time. I propose instead the wording "Many modern scholars believe that the mania was not as destructive as he described, but was scarcely felt beyond the urban merchants and artisans who participated." 73.71.251.64 (talk) 20:37, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Currently "Many modern scholars believe that the mania was not as destructive as he described, but was limited to cliques of urban artisans".  But should "many" not be "most"?  The preceding sentence is "Mackay claimed that many investors were ruined by the fall in prices, and Dutch commerce suffered a severe shock." - does anybody now believe the 2nd part of this?  Johnbod (talk) 10:12, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: "not enough price data is available to prove that a tulip bulb bubble actually occurred"

message: The background-section was removed some time ago in accordance with DENY. There were also imo issues with the sourcing and citation overkill. It is possible to write a passable background section using only the main sources of this article. I've written one for the svwiki-version and could translate it if there is any interest. It is at 700 odd words so it might need some trimming. Either way I'm not gonna go poking around in a featured article without consulting the locals first. Regards. Draken Bowser (talk) 10:49, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I wouldn't worry about that too much - apart from User:Smallbones the main editors have not edited the article for many years. Johnbod (talk) 15:06, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Background 

message: unless the evidence has just vanished. See this book review in the Smithsonian. ELSchissel (talk) 22:04, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Agreed, it seems not to have been a large bubble
Talk:Flooding algorithm

message: The external links have almost nothing to do with the topic at hand. Perhaps they should be revised?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.5.64.106 (talk) 21:56, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Links 

message: I moved network-specific content to Flooding (computer networking). Not enough remains here on the general topic to justify an article yet but we'll see what happens. --Kvng (talk) 15:45, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved 

message: The WikiProject classification for Flooding algorithm is Start-class. However, the page has less than 100 words, so it might not meet the grading criteria.   ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf)  19:32, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please confirm classification
Talk:Canada goose

message: Would the plural of Canada Goose not be Canadian Geese? My roommate who studies ornithology says it’s not but the grammar is confusing me. Help? 4.18.201.154 (talk) 06:49, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: There's no reason why the plural would be "Canadian". The plural of Canada Goose is Canada Geese. Aythya affinis (talk) 14:43, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

text: @4.18.201.154 Yes, the so-called "Canada Goose" is usually referred to as Canadian Geese in the Northeastern United States. That is the popular and common name for the bird. If you refer to the bird as a Canada Goose you will likely either be corrected or receive blank stares. No one refers to it as the Canada Goose, especially since the birds are rarely seen singularly. In fact, I've never heard it referred to as the Canada Goose except for here on Wikipedia.Stevenmitchell (talk) 01:25, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I've never heard it referred to a Canadian Geese except for here. I am in Canada, however. Here is a National Geographic article calling it the "Canada Goose" -- https://www.nationalgeographic.com/animals/birds/facts/canada-goose. 65.93.52.199 (talk) 19:35, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I live in California where these birds are commonplace, and here people say "Canada goose" or "Canada geese". Cullen328 (talk) 19:40, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: , I lived for decades in Pennsylvania and New Jersey, and it was always "Canada goose" and "Canada geese" there, so presumably it must depend on where in the northeastern US you live. MeegsC (talk) 19:55, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plural? 

message: — Assignment last updated by Mars134340 (talk) 10:15, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: California Natural History

message: An editor has requested that :Canada Goose (clothing) be moved to :Canada Goose, over the current redirect which currently targets this article. Since the subjects are related you  are invited to participate in the move discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 21:53, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move of [[Canada Goose (clothing)]] 
Talk:Richard Perle

message: Thanks to Lambiam for randomly bringing me here. The talk page archives give some indication as to the how and why Perle acquired this nickname, but as a reader, its presence in the article without the accompanying descriptions leave me wanting to know more.  I don't know the answer, but it looks like he acquired the name from being associated with SDI?  Strangely, he isn't mentioned in that article. Viriditas (talk) 23:37, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: There are a score of explanations to be found, but a fair majority ascribes the moniker to Perle's hardline opposition to arms control agreements.  --Lambiam 17:03, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prince of Darkness redux
Talk:USS Indianapolis

message: There's too much information for LCS-17 on what is, essentially, a disambiguation page.  It would be much better to cite sources for this text and expand the stub article for that ship. Canute (talk) 14:20, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Not a dab page, SI pages are list pages, but yes that is some useless nonsense that I removed. Llammakey (talk) 14:23, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  LCS-17
Talk:List of Canadian provincial and territorial symbols

message: The fleur de lys image shown for the Province of Quebec is wrong.  The Quebecois fleur de lys is SILVER, not gold.  Silver is represented in heraldry with the colour white.
The Quebec flag, for example, is an arrangment of heraldic symbols - typically described as a white cross on a blue field, with a white fleur de lys in each quarter.  In fact, the cross and the fleurs are silver; but in heraldic artwork, as noted, silver is represented by white.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.244.43.13 (talk) 02:23, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong 'Fleur' 

message: The capital of Ontario is Ottawa.... Did an American write this article?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.250.112.77 (talk) 18:41, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps it was an American, but they knew what they were talking about. The capital of Canada is Ottawa, the capital of Ontario is Toronto. Nadiatalent (talk) 20:13, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capital of Ontario 

message: If you follow the source linked, you can see in the article that the Red Fox has only passed a "second reading" and still need more to become official: "The bill still has to be called for third reading before it can receive royal assent."
So there are at least two more steps before this is an official animal. The Canadian government has a list of all of the national/provincial/territorial symbols nested in the first reference on this page.''
(Sorry if this isn't what I'm supposed to do, I'm new.) Reyweld (talk) 21:00, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source for Red Fox as National Animal Insufficient
Talk:Ringwood Brewery

message: I like this article, however it needs some NPOV I'm afraid... Any takers??? quercus robur
:yer im going to give it a shot --JMcD 00:17, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lil POV 
Talk:Emo

message: Under "Change to a different style", the word "although" is spelt as "althoguh." Furbyfan4lyf (talk) 21:11, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typo 

message: Elder Emo
"Elder Emo" is a term of endearment granted to the emo bands that have weathered the onset of responsibilities like parenthood and other aspects of adulthood.  Elder Emo intends to embrace the role of emeritus members and elder statespersons of a genre that is a little surprised by not only its own longevity and status but the sharing of adulthood with many of their fans.
Ronnie Winter of Red Jumpsuit Apparatus informed the crowd of their membership during their set in the SoWhat? music festival in Dallas 2023. IIRC.life (talk) 20:26, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 14 July 2023 

message: Change
[[Extraversion and introversion
|introversion]]
to
introversion
as it appears improperly Lemonlite (talk) 05:22, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: ULPS (talk) 05:31, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 17 July 2023 

message: kuch mang rahi hu tumse 767tfg (talk) 06:42, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Song
Talk:Detroit Electric

message: How were the batteries in these cars charged?
: I think it can be assumed that they were charged at home for the most part.  In the UK, they used to have (maybe still do) a "white meter" which only supplied power at night during periods of low demand for lower cost than the regular "black meter" ... this was used with special cables for storage heaters in the winter.  The same idea could be used to provide lower cost electricity when charging electric vehicles at night.Enquire (talk) 08:43, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: When you clearly have no information about the matters you expostulate,   why not make bold abitrary assumptions instead ?   Why not ?  The concept of "off-peak" storage water heaters did not come into use until after WW2,  long after electric cars had fallen out of use.Eregli bob (talk) 12:02, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Charging the Detroit Electric 

message: This article was originally about a defunct company that built electric vehicles in the early 20th century.  Now the rights to this company have been acquired and a new company with the same name is now in operation to supply electric vehicles in the early 21st century.  Obviously this is the same company in name only and it would be logical to split this article into two ... one for the 20th century company and another for the 21st century company.Enquire (talk) 08:43, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. Seems to be little or no overlap between the historic company and the new one of the same name. -- Infrogmation (talk) 08:48, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

text: The article says they went defunct in 1939. If that's not true, it should be changed. And it would be nice to have a source for this info. The only source we have now is a broken link. Kendall-K1 (talk) 11:53, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split Article? (a) Original company & (b) new company 

message: So how is the plan for 270,000 electric cars THIS YEAR going ?    Going well ?   When can I buy one,  Clownish forecasts from when,  2006 ?,  have no business here.Eregli bob (talk) 12:04, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I tried to fix it but couldn't find anything worth salvaging so I removed the entire section. If anyone wants to put the section back in, please cite your sources, and leave the breathless ad copy out. Kendall-K1 (talk) 11:48, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

text: In 2016, there were 159,000 plug-in hybrids and electric vehicles sold in the US. Not sure if it is relevant to the page, though. Ref: http://insideevs.com/monthly-plug-in-sales-scorecard/  313-Matt  —Preceding undated comment added 16:08, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dated information
Talk:Sisavang Vatthana

message: I believe there are two pages for savang vatthana.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.6.39.21 (talk) 21:04, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two Pages? 
Wikipedia talk:Glossary

message: should we add "barnstaritis" to the list 92.24.91.127 (talk) 09:20, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: What is it? --DB1729talk 11:22, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I imagine it's a "disease" (obsession) related to using barnstars. Even better, there's a WP page for it. – The Grid (talk)  13:46, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, thanks. I must have mistyped my search for it. --DB1729talk 16:12, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

text: @The Grid, we should add the term to the list, I wanted to post this on the talk page so I wouldn't make edits and then get them reverted for vandalism, that is annoying, 88.110.61.147 (talk) 15:07, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  barnstaritis