Talk:Romanian language in Vojvodina

message: :Image:11120.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:55, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:11120.jpg

message: The old Constitution of the Republic of Serbia is no more. A new one has been adopted, a long time ago. --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 12:20, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Constitution 

message: Panonian, you clearly have some personal problems with Romanians and Romanian language/culture. Everywhere you go on wikipedia you speak against us, and trying to make Vlachs a separate nation/language. If you knew, and i believe you know, Vlachs is just a name that Slavic people use for Romanians, nothing else, not a nation, separate people or language. Aromanians as well. So please, stop your "work" against Romanians on wikipedia. I thought that our people are friends, and friends don`t lie one about another. 
Your "facts" , "work" and of course your point of view should be totally ignored.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Iadrian yu (talk • contribs) 00:10, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Panonian shoud be ignored. 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Official status of Romanian language in Vojvodina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://webrzs.stat.gov.rs/Ter/epop.htm
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20111006211426/http://www.libertatea.rs/cutenews/search.php?misc=search&subaction=showfull&id=1136041742&archive=&cnshow=news&start_from=& to http://www.libertatea.rs/cutenews/search.php?misc=search&subaction=showfull&id=1136041742&archive=&cnshow=news&start_from=&
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20111006211452/http://www.libertatea.rs/pagini/editorial.php?subaction=showfull&id=1173653648&archive=&start_from=&ucat=18& to http://www.libertatea.rs/pagini/editorial.php?subaction=showfull&id=1173653648&archive=&start_from=&ucat=18&
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070927034151/http://www.divers.ro/initiative_ro?wid=37619&func=viewSubmission&sid=3055 to http://www.divers.ro/initiative_ro?wid=37619&func=viewSubmission&sid=3055
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20111006211504/http://www.libertatea.rs/pagini/banatul.php?subaction=showfull&id=1124533880&archive=&start_from=&ucat=6& to http://www.libertatea.rs/pagini/banatul.php?subaction=showfull&id=1124533880&archive=&start_from=&ucat=6&
*Added  tag to http://www.radionovisad.rs/org/RoREDAKCIJA/RoRoREDAKCIJA.htm
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20071010205357/http://80.93.248.233:7001/listen.pls to http://80.93.248.233:7001/listen.pls
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120212160729/http://www.vojvodina.gov.rs:80/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=174&Itemid=83 to http://www.vojvodina.gov.rs/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=174&Itemid=83
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20100822141313/http://www.vojvodina.gov.rs:80/index.php?option=com_docman&Itemid=70 to http://www.vojvodina.gov.rs/index.php?option=com_docman&Itemid=70
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110727143225/http://www.ombudsmanapv.org/rom/onama_rom.html to http://www.ombudsmanapv.org/rom/onama_rom.html
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20101026053456/http://www.knjigavoj.co.rs:80/ to http://www.knjigavoj.co.rs/
*Added  tag to http://www.radionovisad.rs/RoHP.htm
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070628044438/http://www.rri.ro/index.shtml?lang=2 to http://www.rri.ro/index.shtml?lang=2
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070926231827/http://www.romanii.ro/romanii_de_langa_noi/1ROMANII%20DIN%20BANATUL%20SARBESC.doc to http://www.romanii.ro/romanii_de_langa_noi/1ROMANII%20DIN%20BANATUL%20SARBESC.doc
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:46, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Shouldn't this article be moved to Romanian language in Vojvodina? The article is not just about its official status, but also covers for example extent of use in various social domains. – Uanfala (talk) 23:41, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title