Talk:Doctor of Management

message: http://www.aasa.org/publications/content.cfm?ItemNumber=9280 this article from the AASA discusses the doctor of management programs at different univerisities. It may help as a reference.
http://www.doctorofmanagement.com/index.php/index.html a site about doctor of management programs.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.165.240.133 (talk) 06:36, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  reference suggestions 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Doctor of Management. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.doctorofmanagement.com/
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.aacsb.edu/home-bestbizschools/doctorate/programs/dba
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090711061612/http://www.aacsb.edu:80/resource_centers/DoctoralEdu/BusinessProfessor-full.pdf to http://www.aacsb.edu/resource_centers/DoctoralEdu/BusinessProfessor-full.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090711061612/http://www.aacsb.edu:80/resource_centers/DoctoralEdu/BusinessProfessor-full.pdf to http://www.aacsb.edu/resource_centers/DoctoralEdu/BusinessProfessor-full.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141219110256/http://www.phdproject.org:80/faqs.html to http://www.phdproject.org/faqs.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090802034638/http://www.hbs.edu:80/doctoral/SYOA/page2.html to http://www.hbs.edu/doctoral/SYOA/page2.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090802034633/http://www.hbs.edu:80/doctoral/SYOA/page1.html to http://www.hbs.edu/doctoral/SYOA/page1.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:20, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: An unregistered editor is insisting that these edits remain in this article.  First, much of the material is completely unsourced.  Second, some of the material, particularly the section headings, violate the Manual of Style.  Third, some of the material is complete nonsense e.g., "As a doctor within the management academy, this practitioner is part of a group of authorities and leaders in this ﬁeld of scholarship and practice and is permitted to generate theories, dictate standards, prescribe methods, and scrutinize new and existing concepts or ideas pertaining to managerial thought [emphasis added]." ElKevbo (talk) 23:09, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that the material needs to be either sourced or removed, and even if sourced needed to be re-written to sound less like it's been copeid straight from a promotional brochure for the degree. There also seem to be a number of unqualified statements that the D.M. is considered a research doctorate, which seems rather strong as it isn't on the NSF list (I've removed the speculation – which I don't think even deserves the name original research – that the NSF would be adding it 'soon'). Robminchin (talk) 12:53, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, if they do not have specific reliable references for these statements, I would suggest they are fair game to remove. The wording appears to me to be WP:POV at least in terms of style with the use of words like permitted, dictate, scrutinize. These are generally the type of POV that some in academia use to promote positive and elitist view of specific fields. Randomeditor1000 (talk) 17:46, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced and MOS-violating material