Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Biodiversity, Protected areas & Environment of India

message: * WWF-India (Stub class, needs to be worked upon)
Atulsnischal (talk) 14:33, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Help expand following stub class articles

message: Hi to members of this wikiproject.  I have been doing what I thought was non-controversial cleanup work within WikiProject Protected Areas WP:PAREAS on the Protected areas in the United States.  
There is an ongoing "Categories For Discussion" proposal to rename a whole bunch of U.S. subcategories to use "Protected areas of" the U.S. or "of" a given U.S. state, rather than "in" the U.S. or subregion.  The discussion is here: Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2008 May 9#Categories: Protected areas, National Forests, National Monuments, bird sanctuaries, wildlife sanctuaries of/in the United States.  It was pointed out that these renames would be inconsistent with categories in other nations.  I plan to expand the CFD proposal, or create a new one, to propose changing "Protected areas of Australia" to "Protected areas in Australia", and the same for other countries.  I don't want to step on toes, but this should apply also to rename :Category:Protected areas of India to :Category:Protected areas in India, and make corresponding changes "of" to "in" for various subcategories, so I want to give you notice here before and/or while I compose the proposal.  I will watch / participate in discussion here. 
The basic reasoning:  "Protected areas" is a designation of a world-wide body, the IUCN, and no nation designates Protected Areas, so I believe that it is proper to describe "Protected areas in" a given nation or subregion, rather than Protected areas of the nation.  Nations do designate their own National Parks and National Monuments and so on, so it is proper to say "National Parks of the United States" or other nation, but National Parks are not "of" a subregion so there should be subcategories like National Parks in Alabama (a U.S. state).  
The implementation would all be done automatically, by a bot that will implement the rename for all articles in any affected category.  A notice of proposed change of category name will be posted in each category, so that adequate notice will be given to anyone maintaining/watching any affected category.
By the way, a big batch of category renames was done for U.S. National Historic Landmarks "of"  any given state to National Historic Landmarks "in" the given state, a few months ago.
I hope this should be recognized as an improvement or neutral, and not be problematic.  Please do comment! doncram (talk) 01:35, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2008 May 13#Renames of categories for National Parks, Protected Areas, related categories world-wide which proposes renames for various categories of protected areas in India, as well as much more. doncram (talk) 20:31, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categories For Discussion:  change from Protected areas "of" India to Protected areas "in" India  

message: * Kashmir stag 
* Pygmy hog
* Wild Asian Water Buffalo
Thanks
Atulsnischal (talk) 02:07, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Kindly assist in developing these articles

message: TinucherianBot can automatically tag articles with  Banner as  to the talk page of articles without the project banner. It can also add the workgroup paramaters like "|kerala=yes|kerala-importance=" etc ,if needed. The currently supported workgroups are  Kerala,  Maharashtra,  Andhra pradesh, Tamil Nadu,  Gujarat, Bengal, Goa, Himachal Pradesh , Karnataka , Punjab,cities,  Cinema, Literature, Protected Areas of India, History, Politics, states, Geography,Maps,Districts and Tamil. 
If you need so, you need to provide me with the Categories to run the Bot. Due to some technical issues, the Bot will not run recursively to sub-categories. The requester should kindly verify that  there are NO non-related articles in the category. 
You may request for the bot run on my talk page... Thanks --   TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)      - 06:38, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: My bot will run on the categories in Wikipedia:WikiProject Protected areas of India/AutoTagging regularly or upon request. Should be need any more categories to be added , Discuss here and add them. --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 11:34, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Tagging with [[User:TinucherianBot|TinucherianBot]]

message: To help this workgroup patrol existing articles for vandalism/recent changes, Ganeshbot has created the Wikipedia:WikiProject Protected areas of India/Articles page. This page will be updated on a regular basis. Please do remind me if I forget. :) It contains articles that were tagged with the India banner and fall under the scope of this workgroup. Please let me know in case of any questions. Thanks, Ganeshk (talk) 11:35, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Watchlists

message: User:WolterBot has created a Wikipedia:WikiProject Protected areas of India/Cleanup listing page; it contains the articles that fall under the scope this workgroup and have cleanup tags on them. See this page for more information on this works. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Ganeshk (talk) 04:04, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup listings

message: As you may have heard, we at the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial Team recently made some changes to the assessment scale, including the addition of a new level.  The new description is available at WP:ASSESS.
*The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.  
*The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.  
*A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.  
Each WikiProject should already have a new C-Class category at :Category:C-Class_articles.  If your project elects not to use the new level, you can simply delete your WikiProject's C-Class category and clarify any amendments on your project's assessment/discussion pages.  The bot is already finding and listing C-Class articles. 
Please leave a message with us if you have any queries regarding the introduction of the revised scheme.  This scheme should allow the team to start producing offline selections for your project and the wider community within the next year.  Thanks for using the Wikipedia 1.0 scheme! For the 1.0 Editorial Team, §hepBot (Disable) 21:17, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes to the WP:1.0 assessment scheme

message: Kaziranga National Park is "Today's featured article" on English Wikipedia main page .
Atulsnischal (talk) 07:04, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Congratulations to team

message: Wikipedia 0.7 is a collection of English Wikipedia articles due to be released on DVD, and available for free download, later this year. The Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team has made an automated selection of articles for Version 0.7.
We would like to ask you to review the articles selected from this project. These were chosen from the articles with this project's talk page tag, based on the rated importance and quality. If there are any specific articles that should be removed, please let us know at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.7. You can also nominate additional articles for release, following the procedure at Wikipedia:Release Version Nominations. 
A list of selected articles with cleanup tags, sorted by project, is available. The list is automatically updated each hour when it is loaded. Please try to fix any urgent problems in the selected articles. A team of copyeditors has agreed to help with copyediting requests, although you should try to fix simple issues on your own if possible. 
We would also appreciate your help in identifying the version of each article that you think we should use, to help avoid vandalism or POV issues. These versions can be recorded at this project's subpage of User:SelectionBot/0.7. We are planning to release the selection for the holiday season, so we ask you to select the revisions before October 20. At that time, we will use an automatic process to identify which version of each article to release, if no version has been manually selected. Thanks! For the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team, SelectionBot 23:05, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia 0.7 articles have been selected for Protected areas of India 

message: What is the stub template for Protected areas of India? Could not find it out. Thanks. --GDibyendu (talk) 12:27, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  stub template 

message: Hi!  I'd like to draw your attention to the new WikiProject coordinators' working group, an effort to bring both official and unofficial WikiProject coordinators together so that the projects can more easily develop consensus and collaborate.  This group has been created after discussion regarding possible changes to the A-Class review system, and that may be one of the first things discussed by interested coordinators.
All designated project coordinators are invited to join this working group.  If your project hasn't formally designated any editors as coordinators, but you are someone who regularly deals with coordination tasks in the project, please feel free to join as well. — Delievered by §hepBot (Disable) on behalf of the WikiProject coordinators' working group at 06:21, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinators' working group 

message: Is there a problem with the Indian Jurisdiction infobox? Am presently trying to improve Namdapha National Park article and was looking around for infoboxes to steal, but the good ones (like in Eaglenest Wildlife Sanctuary & Kaziranga National Park) have some stray code displaying on the top. Can somebody look into this? prashanthns (talk) 08:08, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Reported in the talk page of the template.--GDibyendu (talk) 15:42, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks!prashanthns (talk) 07:17, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem with Infobox Indian Jurisdtction template? 

message: ===Banni grasslands===
Kindly help improve this article I created in time.
Thanks mrigthrishna (talk) 03:24, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Articles on [[Kutch]] area of State of Gujarat need help

message: Kindly help improve this article I created in time.
Thanks mrigthrishna (talk) 03:24, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Banni grasslands]]

message: === DYK for Banni grasslands ===
	On December 31, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Banni grasslands, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
 Royalbroil 03:42, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: '''Make some DYK suggestions'''

message: On December 31, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Banni grasslands, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
 Royalbroil 03:42, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  DYK for Banni grasslands 

message: Kindly help improve this article in time too.
Thanks mrigthrishna (talk) 07:20, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Chari-Dhand Wetland Conservation Reserve]]

message: Kindly help improve coverage from this area; Separate articles need to be created for (will need good map/satellite images when possible):
1) Greater Rann of Kutch
2) Little Rann of Kutch
NOTE: Also articles for all major wildlife and bird sanctuaries in this area have to be created/improved as and when possible.
* Kutch Desert Wildlife Sanctuary
* Narayan Sarovar Sanctuary
* Kutch Bustard Sanctuary
* Indian Wild Ass Sanctuary
* Indian Wild Ass would be another article from the area. While here might as well improve Kiang, the Tibetan wild ass article, specially it's range and include Ladakh in India as well in Kiang's range.
Thanks mrigthrishna (talk) 06:03, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Rann of Kutch]]

message: Kindly help improve this article about the rarest of mammals Hispid here/Assam Rabbit from India.
Looks like article on common Indian Hare is a stub till now too.
mrigthrishna (talk) 02:42, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Hispid Hare]] & [[Indian Hare]]

message: * ENVIS Centre: Wildlife & Protected Areas (Secondary Database); Wildlife Institute of India (WII)
mrigthrishna (talk) 20:31, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Database

message: If u have some reference books kindly improve this article I created with some scientific references. We need a photo Gallery for this one too.
Thanks
mrigthrishna (talk) 20:31, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Improve article '''[[Karvi]]''' shrub

message: This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 03:48, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP 1.0 bot announcement 

message: *If we work or notice the work of other editors who have been doing great work on this theme, kindly leave an invite on their talk page requesting them to also join this project.
mrigthrishna (talk) 01:03, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Inviting other Editors

message: Hi
When u get time, can u develop above articles or write ups regarding India to include in the list of protected areas and elsewhere. Also see , , , 
mrigthrishna (talk) 19:24, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: 1) Ecologically Sensitive Areas/Ecologically Fragile Areas (India) & 2) Buffer zones (India)

message: Okip   00:02, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Unreferenced living people articles bot

message: Version 0.8 is a collection of Wikipedia articles selected by the Wikipedia 1.0 team for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone.  Articles were selected based on their assessed  importance and quality, then article versions (revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the WikiTrust algorithm.
We would like to ask you to review the Protected areas of India articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (♦) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8 with the details.  You may wish to look at your WikiProject's articles with cleanup tags and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Monday, October 11th.
We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of October, 2010.  As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as One Laptop per Child and Wikipedia for Schools to extend the reach of Wikipedia worldwide.  Please help us, with your WikiProject's feedback! 
For the Wikipedia 1.0 editorial team, SelectionBot 23:30, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected areas of India articles have been selected for the Wikipedia 0.8 release 

message: nominated Kaziranga National Park for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. YellowMonkey  (new photo poll)  01:14, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Kaziranga National Park

message: I have created together with Smallman12q a toolserver tool that shows a weekly-updated list of cleanup categories for WikiProjects, that can be used as a replacement for WolterBot and this WikiProject is among those that are already included (because it is a member of :Category:WolterBot cleanup listing subscriptions). See the tool's wiki page, this project's listing in one big table or by categories and the index of WikiProjects. Svick (talk) 21:27, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject cleanup listing 

message: I find the National Parks of India navbar really inconvenient, and am suggesting improvements at Template talk:National Parks of India#Structure. --ELEKHHT 02:37, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: National parks navbar

message: Hello everyone,
I want to start a discussion about WikiProject Protected Areas of India. We do not have too much activity in the group and the number of articles that this WikiProject looks after is also very small (only 442 as per date).
We have another issue, we do not have any Task Force to deal with green issues, biodiversity or environment.
So I propose that WikiProject Protected Areas of India becomes WikiProject Biodiversity, Protected areas & Environment of India with an enlarged scope.
Please comment below.  AshLin (talk) 17:55, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: As the original creator of this Wikiproject, I would support the above proposal by AshLin. Lets make the group working. Amartyabag  TALK2ME 18:21, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

text: Although I am not a member of this taskforce (but WikiProject Protected areas), the proposal makes sense to me, given that besides its currently small scope there is also full overlap with WikiProject Protected areas. --ELEKHHT 22:34, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: In the absence of any dissenting voice, I take it as accepted & shall start making the changes. AshLin (talk) 10:36, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changing the scope of WikiProject Protected Areas of India 

message: Hi,
I created the article Nauradehi Wildlife Sanctuary, thinking it didn't exist, but I recently discovered that the article Noradehi. Would this be a good candidate for a merger/move? Nauradehi seems like the more popular and accurate spelling, and the article "Noradehi" concerns the wildlife sanctuary only.
Also, it would be great for all the talk of Nauradehi concerning Cheetah Reintroduction in India to link to the proper article.
Thanks!
Abp47 (talk) 20:55, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nauradehi - potential merger candidate? 

message: Hi,
Articles related to Khajuraho Group of Monuments (one of the world heritage site) can be considered for this portal. Media related to the monuments is also available at wikicommons. Arhitecture of these monuments have common features.
The related articles are 
*Khajuraho Group of Monuments 
*Southern Group of Temples
**Chaturbhuj Temple 
**DulaDeo Temple
*Eastern Group of Temples
**Vamana Temple 
**Javari Temple 
**Jain Group of Temples 
*Western Group of Temples 
**Lakshmi Temple 
**Varaha Temple
**Lakshmana Temple
**Kandariya Mahadev Temple
**Mahedeva Temple
**Devi Jagdambi Temple 
**Chitragupta Temple 
**Vishwanath Temple
**Nandi Temple 
**Parvati Temple 
Rajenver (talk) 09:20, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Khajuraho Group of Monuments 

message: Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment on the WikiProject X proposal 

message: This is a notice about :Category:Protected areas of India articles needing expert attention, which might be of interest to your WikiProject. It will take a while before the category is populated. Iceblock (talk) 16:12, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expert attention 

message: Hello everyone!
You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!
Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.
Harej (talk) 16:56, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject X is live! 

message: Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for information on WP1.0 web tool 

message: From what I can find Mandla Plant Fossils National Park seems to be a made up park, probably created by the initial article author,  A quick look at google maps shows that the purported location of the park is actually the location of the Ghughua Fossil Park.  I suggest either wholesale deletion of this article, or redirection and history merge into Ghughua Fossil Park. I'm notifying recent editors of that article and relevant wkiprojects.--Kevmin § 01:29, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge discussion for Ghughua Fossil Park & Mandla Plant Fossils National Park