lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Writ of attaint

message: This article seems inaccurate, though I don't know enough to correct it -- it states that writ of attaint was obsolete in criminal trials by the end of the 15th-c, and then ended in civil cases with Bushell's case.  Bushell's case is a criminal trial from 1670, so this statement is confusing.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.231.156.116 (talk) 03:42, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Writ of attachment

message: A prejudgment writ of attachment is just one kind of writ of attachment. It hardly requires a second article, and the encyclopedia doesn't need two perpetual stubs at these titles. BD2412 T 06:00, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 22:18, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Propsed merge from [[prejudgment writ of attachment]].
Talk:Battery (tort)

message: The usage and primary topic of "battery" is under discussion, see talk:battery (electricity) -- 70.51.46.39 (talk) 06:07, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: "Battery"

message: I see that some changes have been made to the article that are supported by primary resources and thus become problematic under sourcing standards (see WP:RS and WP:RSLAW) as well as raising issues of original research. Please recall, it doesn't matter whether you're right, additions to an article should be properly supported by reliable secondary sources -- and may even end up being removed if they're instead original research or not properly supported. Please keep in mind that judicial opinions (case law) are a primary source. Thank you. Arllaw (talk) 12:45, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please Use Reliable Secondary Sources
Talk:Federal Judicial Center

message: The problem with our Judiciary today is that the people have lost faith in it.
I say this from experience.  From the day Constitution was written the people were told by the framers and the preparers of the Federalist papers, as well as Thomas Jefferson and others t hat our govt was to be limited and any act contrary to the Constitution was VOID and any reviewing judge of an unauthorized act had to declare it void.
But t he corruption in our courts today have made a mockery of founders and the Constitution.  One judge simply wont enforce the Constitution, pecedent of the Supreme Court, or any law if it has a negative effect on the judge that made the erroneous and illegal ruling.
Judges have literally changed the terms of contract and changed the terms disclosed under federal law to cover the butt of a lower court judge.   When sued for impairing a contract and thereby denying the right to enforce that same contract, each judged admitted the illegal acts.  But the federal court simply dismissed the case and refused to declare their acts VOID.  So the ruling stands inspite of our Supreme Court having ruled any such act that violates the Constitution is "void on its face".
The Supreme Court is just a guilty.   When the case was presented to them, they refused to accept it.  
In fact each court (fed. trial court, court of appeals and SC all either dismissed the case without comment, denied the appeal without comment, or denied review without comment.   Thus the "Black Hole" of the judiciary is still at work.
Obviously our Congress wont review a court or a judges actions.  It wont impeach or investigate the illegal acts of our courts.  Sen. Feinsteins office informed me that because the Judiciary is a equal and separate branch of govt, the Congress had no jurisdiction to review the acts of judges.
Funny, our founders told us that the Judiciary was the third and weakest branch of govt and they wouldnt dare violate the Constitution of laws of this nation for they would be impeached and removed immediately.  Thus Congress has always had the right and DUTY to oversee the acts of every federal judge - it simply wont do it delegated duties>
It is my belief that we must amend the Constitution so the people can directly remove any judge for illegal acts.  This is necessary because Congress "has no authority to do so" according to Sen. Feinstein or Rep. Woolsey.
Judicial Councils, Judicial Center, etc are no more than wastes of taxpayer money we can no longer afford.   
Ask yourself, how can an impairment of a legal contract go through 4 reviewing courts and be dismissed when the judges admitted they had impaired the contract and the Constitution prohibits that act???
Who does one complain to when the courts and congress wont abide by the Constitution?   We rid ourselves of a King the last time the people werent listen to.  Perhaps it is that time again!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zumabtrancas (talk • contribs) 13:54, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Judicial Center is a waste of taxpayer money!
Talk:Federal Kidnapping Act

message: Was the kidnapped Lindbergh child actually transported across state lines? Tisane (talk) 03:08, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: If this law was inspired by the Lindbergh kidnapping, why was it not introduced into Congress until 15 years after the kidnapping? --Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:11, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Lindbergh connection?

message: Wasn't there an amendment made to the law that crossing state lines became a presumption so as to allow federal police involvement from the outset? I see nothing about this in the entry, so may be totally mistaken, or it may be a de facto sort of thing rather than de jure. 2601:346:1180:4320:21D8:4286:A56A:2DA9 (talk) 15:18, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Federal case?
Talk:Development plan

message: Better to discuss this historic predecessor along with its successor. Daask (talk) 22:49, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of Local plan into Development plan 

message: Councils are still producing new Local Plans in 2020 so have they actually been abolished? Crookesmoor (talk) 12:06, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Local Plans
Talk:Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976

message: *Material merged from similarly-titled article here: . One link dead, the other works as of today. Montanabw(talk) 21:27, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article does a good job in succinctly stating the longer title of Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, its date of enactment, and the acts FLPMA repealed and amended. It also provides a brief and precise statement of the FLPMA's purpose. Eaowen16 (talk) 11:55, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article critiques
Talk:Deviant sexual intercourse

message: And without mouth-anus? This seems in NY. From Sodomy: e.g. New York State Penal Law, Article 130, "Deviant Sexual Intercourse". The definition in this particular instance is as follows- "Deviant sexual intercourse means sexual conduct between persons not married to each other consisting of contact between the penis and the anus, the mouth and the penis or the mouth and the vulva" --Franz (Fg68at) de:Talk 03:55, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Only outside of marriage?
Talk:Wraparound mortgage

message: I came to this page by searching "assumable" because I kept seeing it pop up in home listings (generally saying "not assumable"), but as a novice homebuyer who's just starting to look, I find this article gives me very little sense of how any of this works. The article needs to be written such that people who've never had a mortgage of any kind can understand it; right now, it seems to be one step short of "lawyerspeak," as if someone had tried to clarify but without success. Lawikitejana 01:06, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This needs better or clearer examples
Talk:Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law

message: Could use an infobox, but needs some formatting, expanison, and some more sources to move up to B. Should definatly mention it is in the United States in the first sentence or two. Aboutmovies 16:16, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: What do you know about ADHD/Bi-Polar/Learning Disabilities?
My son was diagnosed at age 7.  Bi-Polar Mom and other son.
My son's grades this last school year are all F's...... Now a teen in MANIA.
Last year was the first year we placed the ED Emotional Disturbed on him.
To qualify for Adolescent Day Treatment.  Was a great student but again receiving F's.
This facility was 2.5 hours academic instruction the rest Mental Health.
This last school year attending a Regular Middle School w/sibbling.  Never a problem at school, but,
failing academically and as of today has not attended school for past 4 weeks.
I feel that he is in Mania and involved in very risky/dangerous behavior.
Staying out until 4:00 AM
Smoking
Drinking
Stealing
Bumming
I work w/school they say call the police.  police say call the school.
Bottom LINE.
They want my son to get in trouble w/the LAW and become a juvenile offender so that they (Juvenile Probation)
 can take charge........ I call it passing the buck.
Meanwhile I can't get the much needed services my son needs.  As the rate he is going, he will be dead this year.
A MOM, ADVOCATE for my Sons,
What to do??????  School gave him him a S/Emotional Test and said this year he is not ED Emotional Disturbed.
Yet, my son's Psychiatrist say's he is.....
I can be reached anytime at (559) 704-7893  Mother needs help!
I am a resource person who shares at every CAC Meeting every month.  That would be a SELPA meeting.  But, now I need help!
````  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.182.48.167 (talk) 18:42, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Residential School for my son who turned 15, last week
Talk:HM Prison Wormwood Scrubs

message: If anyone's interested, I've proposed a new wikiproject for the creation and improvement of articles regarding specific prisons, internment camps, and detention centers here. --Cdogsimmons (talk) 02:02, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikiproject Prisons 

message: § The prison today says
: There is a contracted prison shop previously run by Aramark, but now run by DHL who provide a selection of consumables for purchase by the prisoners.
Who or what is that? DHL redirects to DHL Express, which says
: DHL Express is a division of the German logistics company Deutsche Post DHL providing international express mail services.
which certainly doesn't run any part of Her Majesty's prisons...or does it? --Thnidu (talk) 05:50, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  DHL? 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: not moved. per discussion consensus. Arguments via ngrams were unconvincing to discussion participants, and no other policy-based arguments were brought to bear. COMMONNAME was convincing to participants assembled here that the article should not be renamed, and that the current article is appropriate. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 18:12, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 4 September 2022
Talk:Santa Rita Jail

message: If anyone's interested, I've proposed a new wikiproject for the creation and improvement of articles regarding specific prisons, internment camps, and detention centers here. --Cdogsimmons (talk) 02:34, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Which was apparently successful, and thus this article has been added to the project, per the above banner.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 07:06, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikiproject Prisons 

message: The jail is indeed in Dublin, but (like the adjacent Federal Correctional Institution) it was formerly referred to as being in Pleasanton. This is because at the time the original jail (and the FCI) were built, Dublin was very small and did not even extend as far east as Camp Parks, and the nearest city (and the postal address used) was Pleasanton. Wolfe must have referred to somewhat older sources; the jail was considered to be "in Pleasanton" until the late 1980s or early 1990s.  
With respect to some of the material I removed, please note that neither Pleasanton nor Livermore are "planned communities"; both are very old (by California standards) valley towns with a number of historic buildings. Dublin is newer, and lacks an old downtown, but is not truly a planned community like Columbia, Maryland or Celebration, Florida. --MCB (talk) 06:10, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location of the jail and ''[[A Man in Full]]'' 

message: Good luck getting a photo, if you try to take a photo anywhere near the jail, you will likely get arrested or cited. perhaps someone can find a satellite image, or take one from a plane? please dont go there to take a photo, its built like a military compound, with clear lines of sight from all vantages looking out.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 02:46, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo
Talk:Federal Occupational Health

message: This article has been erroneously tagged as a copyright violation, based on probable copying from this site: http://www.foh.dhhs.gov/Whoweare/whoweare.asp .  The referenced site is a work of the U.S. federal government, and as such, is not subject to copyright.  See WP:Public_domain#U.S._government_works.  Yes, it ought to be cleaned up and made into a real article, not a copy of a public domain resource. But it's not a copyright violation.  The edit introducing the tag should be reverted. TJRC (talk) 00:17, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a copyvio
Talk:Federal Odometer Act

message: According to the historical notes in , the only public law passed in 1972 that touched this section was the "Motor Vehicle Information and Cost Savings Act". That covered more than just odometers. As such, I propose that this article should be renamed "Motor Vehicle Information and Cost Savings Act" and the relevant "Federal Odometer Act" be subsumed as a section in it. --Syed (talk) 05:53, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  No such "Federal Odometer Act" in 1972?
Talk:Bearer instrument

message: Not sure why the dubious tag is on the line about early paper money being a bearer instrument for precious metal, it's completely supported by eg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silver_certificate_%28United_States%29. Tossrock (talk) 19:09, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I think there's a distinction between "you can redeem this for the property" and "holding this means you are the owner of the property"; in the former case, you have to give up the certificate to get the actual silver, and that's how certificates worked. 24.61.207.84 (talk) 22:07, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Why dubious?
Talk:High Sheriff of Hertfordshire

message: Google search for "High Sheriff of Hertfordshire" restricted to UK sites brought up the information I've added on the article page. Needs fleshing out. Emeraude 17:14, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If anyone cares to take a look at High Sheriff of Cheshire you will see that I've managed to find virtually all the original announcements of Sheriffs back to 1850.  Sheriffs of Hertfordshire will be in the same annual lists.  David Underdown (talk) 11:05, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Casualty Actuarial Society

message: * http://zhongwei.mofcom.gov.cn/aarticle/zhongyaozt/200612/20061204063475.html
--222.67.213.248 (talk) 08:32, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Chinese translations of the term are based on the following.... 
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Pharmacology/Archive before merge

message: Hi there. Are you guys aware of Wikipedia:WikiProject Drugs (of which I'm a member, BTW)? I foresee some serious overlap here. Fvasconcellos 13:28, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Pharmacology is a fairly generic topic; drugs refer to specific substances, whereas pharmacology is that whole study of substances interacting with organisms. Perhaps we can merge forces to create a WikiProject Pharmacology and Drugs, perhaps? ★MESSEDROCKER★ 16:05, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm replying on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Drugs. Fvasconcellos 17:30, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Pages can be part of multiple WikiProjects, so it can be a part of this one as well. ★MESSEDROCKER★ 12:16, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:DRUGS]]

message: Hey guys .. I havn't noticed this project till today .. please add it to the wikiprojects directory .. before few days i have created Portal:Pharmacy and Pharmacology and I was looking for a Wikigroup to take care about this Portal ... I need to hear your opinion about this work ... any suggestion for Improving it . This portal could be one of the first tasks of this Project . I will try also to help assessing Articles and improving Categorizaion in Pharmacology and Pharmacy categories .--Chaos 19:05, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Pharmacy and Pharmacology Portal

message: Crosspost:
::about the merge suggession between this Project and Drugs project .. I fully support that and I suggest that the name becomes Project Pharmacy and Pharmacology ... so it will takes cares about three related topics .
::we can create three taskforces :
::* Pharmaceutics taskforce
::* Pharmacology taskforce
::* Drugs and Medications taskforce .
::--Chaos 13:57, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The Merge Issue

message: Allosteric Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor needs a little to become a stub.--Stone 14:30, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: New page

message: I requested a "semi-protection" and it was granted, although it won't last as long as i hoped, but hey 2-3 weeks is better than nothing. -- Boris 15:44, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Cocaine]]
Talk:Friedrich-Werner Graf von der Schulenburg

message: His role as Emissary to Iran during the 1930's needs to be mentioned. It's actually the most significant part of his work. I will later add information to this.
Napht 17:05, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This section is confusingly worded  -  maybe some parts have been edited-out. His role in the July Plot is not explained at all. 86.148.149.50 (talk) 14:50, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resistance Activities 

message: He was a member of the plot because he believed Nazis lost its core ideas. He supported Nazi party since its early beginning. So the reason for joining he plot against Hitler was actually to restore "true Nazism". This probably should be added. One of his goals was to annex to Germany territories as far as Lithuania.
--MyMoloboaccount (talk) 22:19, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Role in July Plot 

message: The reference cited for the affirmation about his goals in the East (″Schulenburg's plans for post-Hitler goals in the East were similar to those of the Nazis on many points, and he believed that the Russians and other Eastern European nations could be easily subjected to German supremacy as they were "young people untouched by western civilization" of "simple faith"; in Schulenburg's view Europe was to be dominated by Germany, which would annex lands stretching up to Vilnius, Minsk, and Lublin in the East, to Prague and Brno in the South, and to Groningen and Liege in the west.″) does not refer to Friedrich Werner Graf von der Schulenburg, but to Fritz-Dietlof Graf von der Schulenburg, also a member of the German Resistance, and moreover does not refer to annexation but to German hegemony and supremacy. So I think it should be removed.87.219.49.218 (talk) 18:59, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference about goals in the east
Talk:Angle of arrival

message: So what is the exact difference between "Angle-of-Arrival" and "Direction-of-Arrival"? The DoA article points to the AoA article, but this does not really make it clear. Mbssch 17:29, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

message: Should there be a paragraph or section on the addition of AoA/AoD to the Bluetooth 5.1 standard? ThePlug111 (talk) 23:20, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bluetooth 5.1
Talk:Lettered olive

message: Does anyone have information about ink/dye from olive shells being used LONG-AGO to provide the color for the robes of Catholic Bishops??
 Thanks, BMJD
I believe you are thinking of murex shells, not olives, a different family of marine gastropods. Take a look at Tyrian purple. Invertzoo (talk) 17:57, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Littorinimorpha

message: I removed Family Ampullinidae from Superfamily Naticoidea. Ampullinids belong in, and are already listed under, Superfamily Campaniloidea. Their resemblance to naticids is superficial. Emmastaffron (talk) 22:21, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. I also cleaned up a bit Campaniloidea. JoJan (talk) 14:51, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Ampullinidae removed
Talk:Red-rimmed melania

message: The following external link has been deleted bvy User:MidgleyDJ as "inappropriate": (The Skeptical Aquarist) Malaysian trumpet snails. It contains sourced material and further links that would improve Wikipedia's distinctly  sub-par article. I thought it was removed simply because it is my website, but now I see the same User deleted the following external links as "inappropriate":
  
* Fact Sheet on the Malaysian Trumpet Snail 	 
* Melanoïdes tuberculata 	 
* AquaHobby 
* The Aquarium Wiki - MTS 
There seems to be a pattern in this behavior, from a User who has not contributed text to this article. Merely pointless? Or what? --Wetman 15:07, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Wetman, Wikipedia has a policy on external links WP:EL. Basically they need at add something unique to the article, beyond that which would be included if the article was of Featured Article quality. The links you cite above do not contain content which is unique or should not be present in a future WP:FA version of the article. Sure, I've not contributed text to this article, but that isnt a requirement for me to edit an article. Please dont take the removal of external links personally, it certainly wasnt meant that way. It might be worth you reading over  Wikipedia:Assume good faith. Cheers, David. MidgleyDJ 20:52, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A quick glance at the texts presented in the deleted links would show MidgleyDJ that he is mistaken. Some of the material he dismisses on principle would improve a mediocre stub if it were worked into the Wikipedia text— not by MidgleyDJ, needless to say: I've noted the deletions above, as a starting-point for an alert editor. --Wetman 21:50, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A quick glance at the text Wetman, suggests to me some of should be included as references for content, rather than external links. I've no idea what an alert editor is - but I was certainly acting in good faith in removing the articles. MidgleyDJ 21:55, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm sure it doesn't matter either way. Let's just focus on improving the article and move on, eh? At least one of the removed references had much useful information and has been worked into the revised article more than once. The others seemed to be mostly about snails in aquaria, and as such a book about aquarium snails seemed much better to me, so I used that as a reference. Incidentally, I moved the articles to a different common name because it appears that the "MTS" name was basically only used by aquarists, and then only in certain placed (Malayan livebearing snail is at least as commonly used). Cheers, Neale Neale Monks 22:05, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Inappropriate" links or inappropriate behavior?

message: Hello. I've rewritten the article, specifically added references, transferred focus from aquarium stuff to actual biology and agri/medical significance. Cheers, Neale Neale Monks 16:12, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a more positive approach. --Wetman 21:50, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite