Talk:Driver's education

message: I just moved this article from Driver's Ed to Driver's Education per a request at WP:RM.  Then, I noticed that the move template on this talk page was suggesting Driver's education, with a lower-case 'e'.  I feel like it's a proper noun, being the title of a specific course in schools, but if I'm wrong about that, I can help move it to the lower-case title. -GTBacchus(talk) 05:31, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename

message: :Image:Ohiodriversmanual.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 14:11, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Ohiodriversmanual.jpg

message: I'm not sure that all the information in the section is relevant to an article on Driver's Ed. At the same time, there is not really enough information to warrant a separate article on the subject in my opinion. 
Also, the uberpedia link cited at the end of the section indicates that the article originally was taken verbatim from another website. The site does not provide any sources relevant to this section so any implication that the link verifies the information in the article is false. Should this link be left in? Maybe it'd be best if the section was condensed and rewritten. Orange43 (talk) 18:48, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  On Track Section 

message: The first tag (of many), includes the words "may not represent a worldwide view of the subject". It seems to me the problem could be addressed by simply changing the title of the article to 'Driver's Education (US). You have to read about halfway through before realising which country it concerns. At a later date, when it is more 'worldwide', the article title could lose the '(US)' suffix. RASAM (talk) 11:06, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name

message: Daniel R. Mayhew of the Traffic Injury Research Foundation has criticized driver's education programs for not demonstrating a positive effect, though driver education should not be abandoned, he said. Driver education and graduated licensing in North America: Past, present, and future<P>Needs to go in a larger section discussing the pros and cons of driver education. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 21:20, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism by  Daniel R. Mayhew of the Traffic Injury Research Foundation