lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Lencola Sullivan

message: Per this article  Sullivan was alleged to have had an affair with Bill Clinton while he was governor of Arkansas by L. D. Brown, who served as a state trooper gaurding Clinton. It is not clear that such allegations should be included in an article on a living person.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:29, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible affair with Clinton
Wikipedia talk:Emergency Desysopping

message: I wonder what problem this is trying to solve? By that I mean a real problem and not a hypothetical one. As a side point (though I believe the writer is aware), implementing this requires a software upgrade. >Radiant< 21:28, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

message: This must not be a shortcut around the current processes, but rather a supplement to them for cases where the damage being caused necessitates immeadiate action. - Stephanie Daugherty (Triona) - Talk - Comment - 08:56, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Concern - this shouldn't be a long term solution
Wikipedia talk:Respect privacy

message: Hm, interesting. Are you talking about people hyhfhhharticles, or about Wikipedia editors? I think it best to keep both issues separate. In the former case, it's already covered in WP:BLP (and also, I'm quite sure that for nearly any encyclopedic person we can quote birthdate, profession, etc). Regarding WP editors, this is definitely a good idea; I seem to recall reading about it before but I can't find it at the moment. Regardless, I believe it has been firmly established that "exposing" other editors is a great way to get yourself blocked. >Radiant< 21:36, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Technically this is office-forced policy, see Wikipedia:Oversight#Policy, however a policy consensus will allow greater community understanding of this. With regards to scope, WP:BLP focuses mainly on libelous claims, which is why this can easily be extended to cover non-public information on non-editors as well as editors. Non-public being the key phrase here, that if someone has already published this information to wikipedia, or has had it covered to the general public, we can detail the personal information. This allows us to cover tabloid investigations of stars and fancies, yet should protect against wikipedians themselves deciding to stalk other people. LinaMishima 05:09, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If this is referring to other Wikipedia editors, this is part of Wikipedia:Harassment. --ais523 14:40, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:HA is a guideline (technically this is already office policy), and is unclear as to what it actually means or sanctions. I see no harming in making the personal information section significantly stronger. LinaMishima 15:13, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No harm at all; I was trying to find the reference that Radiant! was referring to above. --ais523 16:01, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Interesting

message: I object to the nutshell on this page because it is not necessary - the title of the page ("respect privacy") already suffices as a summary. >Radiant< 15:41, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nutshell
Talk:Gülşen (singer)

message: "Homely"?  Just so you are aware this means Ugly in north american English.  perhaps you meant it in the british sense, but keep this in mind. Dan Carkner 04:57, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: True :) By the way don't forget to sign your name using the four ~s. Cheers! Baristarim 04:18, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Actually, "sober" is the most appropriate term, because it also means "not wild, serious, calm" apart from the word's association with absence of alcohol consumption. "Conservative" may imply, for example, the idea that she was previously wearing a headscarf. Anyway, I leave it as it is. Cretanforever 05:51, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  homely? 
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Kosovo/Workshop

message: The items "Politically neutral map", "Neutral Introduction" and "Administration ChrisO not to be allowed to use his administrative rirghts on the Kosovo article" aren't "temporary injunctions" - could this possibly be tidied up? -- ChrisO 21:44, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Misplaced items?

message: I'm not a party in this RfAr, but seeing this, this, and Bormalagurski's edits on September 15, I think there should be a proposed finding of fact which states Bormalagurski disrupted the Wikipedia during the arbitration. --Dijxtra 15:24, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Croatian War of Independence is not, as far as I'm aware, covered by either the arbitration or the injunction - it's not a Kosovo-related article. -- ChrisO 15:41, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes, I agree with you, but if you inspect the diffs I provided, you will see that a clerk put a notice stating that CWoI is related to Kosovo (not that I see how). If that is so, then Boris broke the rules. --Dijxtra 15:11, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Obviously I'm not an arbitrator and it would depend on their interpretation of the injunction. However, it seems to me that it would be inapplicable on those pages if the notice had been placed there in error (as seems to have been the case). -- ChrisO 15:53, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  No, it wasn't an error, see here. --Dijxtra 17:42, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  It was an error, see here  Tony Sideaway is not an arbitrator, and we are still waiting for the articles to be corrected. Laughing Man 22:16, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed finding of fact
Talk:John Howard Payne

message: I have seen his last name spelled as "Payne" (as it is here) and as "Paine".  I know that the spellings were somewhat interchangable in the 1700s, but by 1800 people with this name tended to pick one or the other.  Which is correct? And do we have a source for this determination? Blueboar 21:52, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling of his name 

message: Consensus has determined that Find a Grave is an unreliable source by one or more of the following policies;
*1)-WP:SOURCES; Articles should be based on reliable, third-party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy.
*2)- WP:NOTRELIABLE; Questionable sources are those with a poor reputation for checking the facts, or with no editorial oversight.
*3)- WP:SELFPUBLISH; Find a Grave is user edited and uses anonymous or pseudonymous editors.
*4)- WP:SPS; This includes any website whose content is largely user-generated, including the Internet Movie Database, Cracked.com, CBDB.com, and so forth, with the exception of material on such sites that is labeled as originating from credentialed members of the sites' editorial staff, rather than users. Find a Grave is not currently specifically named as is IMBd but falls under "and so forth". Rational dictates that Find a Grave, while not specifically listed by name in WP:SPS, certainly falls under the criteria. Otr500 (talk) 18:31, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: Find a Grave has picture of gravestone April 9, 1852 Thisdaytrivia (talk) 18:01, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of Death
Talk:Victoria of France

message: You could mention Victoria and her sister at the Catherine de Medici page, but even there I don't think they're worth mentioning. You could make a redirect from here, but the chances of anyone wanting to look up a page called "Joan of Valois" in the first place are virtually nil, in my opinion. You could merge and lose every bit of this page's info and not mention Joan at all, which would be an odd use of the word "merge". The maker of this page, by the way, has deleted himself, it seems. 
Does it matter? Well, when I saw the names of these girls on a Valois box (called Volois, by the way, for goodness sake: see Francis II of France}, I came to this page thinking "who's she?". It's a waste of curiosity, as any link here would be, bless the kid's soul. Come on, administrator, be bold. 
(I hope I didn't use the wrong tag for suggesting deletion of this page. My motivation was to save anyone wasted analysis and discussion.) qp10qp 21:55, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Waste of Space
Talk:Bernal Heights, San Francisco

message: I have heard/read that Bernal Hill was once nicknamed "Nanny Goat Hill".  Other sources seem to claim that this was the name of another hill nearby.  Does anyone know which is correct?
:I believe that "Nanny Goat Hill" is an old name for Potrero Hill, not Bernal Hill. 71.202.102.104 02:38, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: this seems to both be "uncategorized" and in San_Francisco_neighborhoods...could that be?Gailwilliams 23:04, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is san francisco neighborhoods a category ? 

message: Notice the contribution pattern of this indef blocked user.  Both sites are owned by the same individual (confirmed via a whois search). Wikipedia is not a promotional vehicle, and wholesale canvassing of links to a site someone owns or is affiliated with is frowned upon.  Despite the "org" domain, madrono is a commercial design agency whose owner happens to be a freelance writer. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:24, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Since the editor is indefinitely blocked, i dont think this is a concern any more. still, any new external links should be checked for relevancy.(mercurywoodrose)75.61.140.19 (talk) 06:17, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Canvassed links

message: Bradford street is preety steep. Shouldnt it be the steepest street in the usa/ in the world with its 41% grade. I've been up it and its like your jusy looking into the air. id hate to live up there and my car breaks down :( (JonMcGillis)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by JonMcGillis (talk • contribs) 00:00, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: There's a separate page for Bernal Heights Summit, shorter than this one and with some duplication. Maybe it should be merged in to this one? Jef (talk) 02:28, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge in Bernal Heights Summit?

message: Concerts New Floods/Tsunami SEA-Level Streets: <c.1958/Flood 101/ HWY into Cesar Chavez/Old Army Street. 2601:645:8000:1750:A18F:EAA6:4B6E:C83E (talk) 18:51, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  600 Feet above sea level; Twin Peaks 80 Feet above Sae Level.
Talk:William Fitzgerald (Tennessee politician)

message: Sources conflict with each other on what position William Fitzgerald was elected to in 1826.
* Newspaper - confirms election as "solicitor general"
* Newspaper - confirms vacated the role of "solicitor"
* Family Papers - uses phrase "attorney general"
* Congress source - uses phrase "attorney general"
Perhaps these phrases are meant to be used interchangeably, but some clarity may be needed on what are the best phrases to use: "sixteenth judicial district" and "attorney general" OR "sixteenth solicitorial district" and "solicitor general". --Engineerchange (talk) 08:16, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attorney general vs. solicitor general
Talk:Daniel Drake

message: The home in this source http://books.google.com/books?id=-hB6AAAAMAAJ&dq=cincinnati%20the%20queen%20city%20clarke&pg=PA224-IA1#v=onepage&q=cincinnati%20the%20queen%20city%20clarke&f=false is different than that shown in this article.- Gilliam (talk) 13:50, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Drake's home 
Talk:Caen Hill

message: The article says that "The hill probably gets it name from Richard of Caen, Bishop of Salisbury in the 12th century, who rebuilt Devizes castle in stone", however a book I have says this came from French prisoners from Caen during the Napoleonic Wars who were used to build the flight of locks - which is correct? — Rod talk 22:00, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As far as residents are concerned, Caen Hill comes from the Napoleonic War prisoners, who dug out the cutting which is now the Bath Road, and not the canal. This is a bit WP:NOR, but in support there is the adjacent Dunkirk (Dunkerque) Hill – the Chippenham Road – which was also "engineered" at that time. The canal lies between the two roads, but nearer to Caen Hill, so taking its name. The reference books, however, stick with Bishop Richard.--Old Moonraker 21:18, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the reply: Bishop Richard it is then! --Old Moonraker 08:25, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: Pointless to have two articles covering the same thing: merge.--Old Moonraker 08:35, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Caen Hill Locks]]
Talk:Reg Prentice

message: (Chalk) graffiti on school blackboard seen at the time 'Reg Prentice has seen the (blue) light.' (with a drawing of a candle or similar) Jackiespeel 22:02, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

message: He remains the highest-ranking Labour figure ever to defect to the Conservative party.
Erm...Ramsay MacDonald?  I know he didn't officially join the Conservative Party, but that's basically what he did. john k (talk) 17:45, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Defecting
Talk:Charles Richard Fox

message: So if he is illegitimate but his parents subsequently get married,  that's OK, isn't it ? Eregli bob (talk) 15:35, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Illegitimate? 

message: THe article says "Fox was born at Brompton" - but there are (at least) six places in England called Brompton. Which one was he born in? -- Finlay McWalter··–·Talk 10:43, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which Brompton?
Talk:William Morrison, 1st Viscount Dunrossil

message: I was wondering about this.  One cannot unilaterally resign from this august chamber.  One has to apply for appoinment to either the Chiltern Hundreds or as Steward of the Manor of Northstead, but he’s not listed in either of those places.  His ADB entry says “In 1959 he announced his retirement for reasons of health”.  There was a UK general election in 1959, so it seems that he simply chose to bow out and not contest the election, i.e. he retired.  --  JackofOz (talk) 20:19, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Resignation from the UK House of Commons
Talk:1971 Phase 3 GTHO

message: I suggest this page be renamed "GTHO Phase III", as that seems to be the way it is normally referred to. I have set up a page of that name that redirects to this, as I was unable to rename this page (I can't find the Move/rename button) Windymilla 22:07, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename this page
Talk:Sony Group

message: Shouldn't this be merged with Sony?71.120.0.58 12:58, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

message: What is the point of this article? What kind of information is this article supposed to contain that cannot also be contained in the article Sony? Sony Group doesn't seem to be especially notable apart from Sony Corp. I will place a cleanup tag on this article. Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 13:01, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability?
Talk:Virginia State Route 13

message: ;Cumberland 4.06 or 6.48
*6.5 mi 05-1926-01
;Buckingham 8.38, 4.03, 13.14
*8 mi east 02-1925-01
*5 mi west 02-1925-01
*4 mi west 03-1927-01
*7 mi west to Appomattox 08-1928-02
;Appomattox 4.14
*5.3 mi to James River 08-1928-02
;Nelson 6.33
*5.5 mi to Amherst 08-1928-02
;Amherst 30.80
*3 mi west from Amherst 04-1924-01
*5 mi east from Amherst 04-1924-01
*6 mi towards Buckingham 02-1925-01
*3.4 mi west towards Buena Vista 02-1925-01
*4.0 mi towards Forks of Buffalo 05-1926-01
*4 mi west 03-1927-01
*8.1 mi towards Rockbridge, 2.5 mi more 08-1928-02
;Rockbridge 3.12
*3.0 mi, "McCormick's Gate" to Buena Vista - I have no idea where this is or if it's SR 13 04-1924-01
*4.5 mi Amherst towards Buena Vista 08-1928-02
Mileages are all current, and don't all match old ones. The switch from 322 to 13 was in 1926. --NE2 22:14, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Extensions west
Talk:Chimpanzee genome project

message: Great article - but it fails to mention the size of the chimp genome.--Peta 22:18, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Size

message: Perhaps a refernce to some more interesting information? http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs2005/0905chimp.asp  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.82.9.80 (talk) 02:32:33, August 19, 2007 (UTC) 
:I suggest reading the official policy of wikipedia, you can look at the "evidence for common descent" article for more information.Ollyoxenfree (talk) 22:05, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other Sides 

message: The statement "24% of the chimpanzee genome does not align with the human genome" is incorrect.  Only the euchromatic genome has been sequenced accurately enough to allow comparison.  That's about 76% of the whole.  The remainder simply has not been sequenced accurately enough to allow comparison.  See here for details (scroll to the bottom of the thread and read the contribution by "sfs" who worked on the genome project) http://community.bcseweb.org.uk/viewtopic.php?t=2068&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=15 Steve660 (talk) 18:35, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error 

message: Re. the 150k insertion. The diagram shows it to be about 20 Mega Base pairs from the fusion point.
Please can you clarify:
a) "At the site of fusion". How is almost 10% of the size of the chromosome away reconciled with that quote from line one of the section "Genes of the Chromosome 2 fusion site", or indeed with the section title itself?
b) On line 3 of the same paragraph please provide support for the statement "prior to the fusion event". As a layman I can't see how we would could speculate on which occurred first, the fusion or the insertion.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by J8h (talk • contribs) 12:49, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for clarification 

message: In the popular press, one might read that chimps and humans share 96% of their genes in common or something. Is that a scientifically meaningful measure, and if so what is the similarity? Leadwind (talk) 02:49, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  percent similarity with humans 

message: The belief in evolution is like the Kennedy assassination.  Many people were unwilling to accept the truth and a Dallas police dictabelt which recorded four shots one minute after the assassination took place has long been presented in the popular culture as evidence that there was a second gunman.  There is absolutely no solid evidence of chimp-to-human evolution and any claim that there is so is only from one's point of view.  However, it is rational to include arguments from all sides.174.20.103.154 (talk) 23:53, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: The Truth Hurts
Talk:H. W. Brands

message: KConWiki (talk) 22:56, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Parking photograph here for possible future use

message: If anyone has an alternate source for these, please feel free to re-add 
*  Hauenstein Center Lectures
* Hauenstein lecture on taking the measure of American presidents, 7 March 2013
KConWiki (talk) 23:02, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Removing dead links from External
Talk:Hadi Aghily

message: Why do people keep on changing his place of birth to Cyprus? This is a lie, he was born in Tehran.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.1.92.13 (talk) 12:18, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Place of birth 
Talk:Robert Henley, 1st Earl of Northington

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Edofedinburgh 23:15, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: The category :Category:Peers of Great Britain created by George II is placed on the redirect Robert Henley, 1st Baron Northington.
HandsomeFella (talk) 19:02, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categorization as peer
Talk:Klattasine

message: I know why this was removed, but really this article is only a bit more than a stub as yet; there's more to this story.  Is there an "expand" tag?  I'll try and dig out of amazon some book refs/further reading to add here; but as I don't have much time for anyone interested in sourcing them the primary are Mel Rothenburger's The Chilcotin War, Terry Glavin's Nemiah: The Unconquered Country and another from the same publisher (Transmontanus Books) High Slack.  There are others, but those will suffice for now, other than the usual from the Akriggs and other mainstream BC histories.Skookum1 17:02, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: removal of first nations stub

message: This article shows clear bias, uses weasel words, and simply isn't written like a proper biographical entry. Needs to be re-written.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.233.186.135 (talk) 06:52, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: For such a short article, you could be more specific and propose some changes instead of just whining about them.  I agree this is an important biography and needs more detail; to me it reads quite neutral and I'm "up on" native affairs; I suggest you draft what you want and post it here, don't forget to provide citations, and remember to avoid WP:POV in your use of language.Skookum1 (talk) 07:17, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Bias

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Diannaa (talk) 23:37, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:Hani Abdul Muslih al Shulan

message: Replaced transcluded image with inline image -  tag as per dispute on Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption.  Geo Swan 12:55, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Replaced transcluded image with inline image - {{tl|npov}} tag as per dispute on [[Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption]]

message: These links to the page numbers within the OARDEC documents may be useful to other contributors.  Geo Swan (talk) 23:27, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Another useful link is the The Guantanamo Docket it is an interactive database provided and updated by the New York Times. The database is searchable and has the Pentagon documents (CSRT and ARB) included. Additional documents and reliable New York Times research regarding the detainees at Guantanamo are also provided. This is the link to the documents and research regarding Hani Abdul Muslih al Shulan. IQinn (talk) 04:28, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: rough work