lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:AtheOS

message: From this page:
AtheOS is a free Unix-like operating system for x86-based computers.
From the AtheOS website:
AtheOS is not meant to be a new Unix clone (like Linux and *BSD) but a new clean desktop OS.
Ok, not that I know anything about AtheOS, but I'm confused to say the least.
: I can see why :) I think what he meant is that he didn't specifically intend to create a typical command-line-system-with-lots-of-confuddling-directories-and-scripts Unix clone (or AmigaOS & BeOS clone for that matter), but a graphical desktop OS with an integrated gui & its own wiget set, which happened to end up being Unix-like and partially Posix(sp?)-compliant. An AtheOS system doesn't make use of X-Windows, GTK & QT, but does make use of GCC & BaSH, and can run Posix(sp?)-compliant programs with a minimal of porting work. I'm not a kernel-hacker, so I'm no expert on the subject, but to the best of my knowledge it is a Unix-like OS, and is considered as such by others too. If I'm wrong, don't be afraid to say why. Kurt Sk. seems to have halted all work on AtheOS about a year ago, and is now interested in aircraft. Why he would want to dump a huge hobby he had invested 6 years of work into and had almost completed nearly single-handedly remains unknown.
::Actually AtheOS was originally started in 1994 as an AmigaOS clone, but that objective was abandoned. It was called "AltOS" before being renamed to AtheOS too. There're a couple of old screenshots floating around from before the name-change. Crusadeonilliteracy
::Windows NT is fully POSIX-compliant (unlike AtheOS and even Linux) and we do not call it Unix-like.--Dojarca 15:33, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please could someone verify that AtheOS was originally started as an Amiga clone. None of sources confirm this. I also dont see why AtheOS should be classified as AmigaOS-like since it is not an Amiga clone. What defines AmigaOS-like? Xorxos (talk) 22:31, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

message: I tried to find references where AtheOS is claimed to be initially an Amiga (OS) clone. I could not find any reference and links in the article did not help. Therefore I added "citation needed" (fact) tag there. Now there is reference but it is still only saying that "Its UI looks like the Amiga one, but underneath you will most probably see a lot of similarities to BeOS, while it has very good POSIX support, making the Unix application porting, easier.". I checked some AtheOS screenshots and in my opinion it does not even remotely look like the Amiga one. Definitely it is not a proof for AmigaOS clone intentions. I do remember hearing about AmigaOS clone intentions but it is odd that I can not find such claims from the AtheOS website or author's interviews.
I also suggest that this article is removed from AmigaOS category: it does not run AmigaOS software, it is not AmigaOS API compatible and it does not claim usage of Amiga related technology (AmigaGuide, IFF, not even datatypes). Even if it was initially intended as AmigaOS clone it is not one. Xorxos (talk) 20:27, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Is AtheOS Amiga clone?
Talk:Antipsychotic

message: — Assignment last updated by Denisej 2 (talk) 02:53, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Psychology Capstone

message: Under Adverse Effects: "Some atypicals are associated with considerable weight gain, diabetes and the risk of metabolic syndrome." this sentence is used twice.
EDIT: This sentence is also used twice: "A rare but potentially lethal condition of neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) has been associated with the use of antipsychotics." Shoesoft93 (talk) 17:39, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @Shoesoft93  SunilNevlaFan✨ 17:44, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Double sentence
Talk:Kayahan

message: There is no mention of him in
Turkish Music Genres and Artists so maybe this is bunk
_____
Now there is an additon at his name Turkish Music Genres and Artists
However It would be better to flesh out this entry. This artist may not have sufficient stature  to earn a place on the list here.
The criteria are being hammered out slowly.  Generally speaking the goal is to have a list of useable length. Every Turkish artist can't be on the list  so obviously there must be some discrimination over who belongs.  
______________
This is sn encyclopedia. Some facts like where he was born, when, how he came to fame, his musical inffluences. Other notable facts about his life movies made, politics (could be very relavant). I don't know Kayahan but I do know encyclopedia articles. Brilliant prose is what everybody wants.
Two16  
________
:*@Two16 Pls refrain from writing comments about articles or persons you have no idea. Thank you. --CeeGee 15:21, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: @:User:Rms125a@hotmail.com! You tag some of your deletions with OR, I guess meaning W:OR. Those material are never OR. It is only due to lack of your knowledge in Turkish. Use of Google translator may not be sufficient for such copyediting. They are translated exactly from the original text, and the sources are given also. That means, what you've deleted in the article exists in the original text. What is expected is that you maybe copyedit for possible grammer errors and reword if needed. Your comment "cruft" is your POV. I hope someone with Turkish mother language, knowledge of high-level English language and WP editing capabilities can check all out.--CeeGee 17:54, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyediting
Talk:Truly, Madly, Deeply (film)

message: I agree that the two articles should be merged. --Supernumerary 05:03, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree - keep this page and delete the other version. How did we end up with two separate entries anyway?! --Thoughtcat 07:53, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Before the naming conventions were standardised, there was a split over whether film or movie should be used to disambiguate. I've run across one other situation like this.--Supernumerary 23:26, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

text: Good stuff. The correct title though (according to the IMDb entry to which this article links) is "Truly Madly Deeply" (i.e. without the commas). At the moment though if you search for the title without the commas you go straight to the song. Should this be clarified (with a redirect)? --Thoughtcat 13:10, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: It seems as if the DVD has little or no availability (also not on Netflix, as a DVD or streamed). I've Googled for a reason, but have found none. Any ideas that could lead to this info being addable to the article? -- Dan Griscom (talk) 03:12, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I asked in a high street shop and apparently dvds haven't been available in shops in the UK since 2008. The advisor I spoke to said the licence has probably been withdrawn /expired / not re-negotiated. Span (talk) 11:32, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I was able to buy a new Region 1 DVD from a well known online retailer in January, 2023. Frank Lynch (talk) 12:02, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  DVD unavailable? 

message: I think you are aware of Wikipedia:Verifiability. Your claim that this film is shown in tv first is in fact wrong and there IS a source to prove this - have a look at the entry of the official site of British Film Institute http://collections-search.bfi.org.uk/web/Details/ChoiceFilmWorks/150360639 . So don't insist for this wrong edit anymore. -- MovieFex (talk) 18:39, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you are aware that BBC TV productions often get a one time tgheastrical showing - Just see all the Dr Who episodes. Does that mean we change them to film categories? MarnetteD|Talk 19:05, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: You do know that the link you provided does not indicate whether it was in a theatre or TV on August 16th and that the date comes months after the other two dates in the infobox. MarnetteD|Talk 19:07, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: August is later than May, isn't it? So your claim "It aired on TV before it was shown in theaters" is wrong. Theatrical release in USA was 1991-05-03 and in UK 1991-08-16. And if you have a look at the BFI website click on "Release/TV" (link on the left side) there you can see it aired 1992-03-01 in tv. So it is absolutely clear. -- MovieFex (talk) 19:19, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release 
Talk:Child development (disambiguation)

message: I have removed the "limited geographic scope" tags because they are unexplained.  If you think they are deserved, then please feeel free to restore them -- but please also provide a detailed explanation of your concerns right here on this page, so that other editors can figure out what needs to be addressed.  WhatamIdoing (talk) 20:07, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Worldview
Talk:Human skeleton

message: Is the clavicle part of the axial or appendicular skeleton? It's mentioned under 'shoulder girdle' and under 'chest'. I'm confused.
its part of the appendicular skeleton Willing student (talk) 07:45, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Clavicle

message: There seems to be absolutely no mention of the average weight or weight range of human skeletons, nor the ratio of bone weight to body weight. I'm sure readers would be interested in knowing this. Could someone please add this information? Thanks.
--Profound Anarch (talk) 09:16, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The current mentioned weight in the article of 10-11kg is way too high. The cited source (#2) does not even mention anything about bone weight at all. Article should be amended. 87.208.166.165 (talk) 10:19, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weight of a human skeleton? 

message: There Should be 300 Bones in Humans at Birth and not 270 (in the introduction page) 115.96.7.55 (talk) 07:00, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Claims in List of bones of the human skeleton of 300 were remnants of vandalism that I'm addressing now, so don't quote that page. hemantha (brief) 08:36, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 15 January 2022 

message: For addition to the history section
Mishnah Oholot 1:8
There are two hundred and forty-eight limbs in a human body: Thirty in the foot, six for every toe, Ten in the ankle, Two in the shin, Five in the knee, One in the thigh, Three in the hip, Eleven ribs, Thirty in the hand, [that is] six to every finger, Two in the fore-arm, Two in the elbow, One in the upper arm and Four in the shoulder, [For a total of] one hundred and one on the one side [of the body] and one hundred and one on the other. Eighteen vertebrae in the spine, Nine in the
head, Eight in the neck, Six in the key of the heart, And five around the genitals. 98.113.233.220 (talk) 00:11, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Actualcpscm (talk) 09:59, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 15 March 2023
Talk:Philippe, Crown Prince of Belgium

message: Is the Belgian succession gender-neutral?  If not, is there no chance that Prince Philippe might, at some time in the future, have a son?  Is Princess Elizabeth guaranteed to become Queen unless she dies first? -- Zoe
:Yes, since 1991 Belgium has absolute primogeniture: sex doesn't count. -- Someone else 03:15 Jan 14, 2003 (UTC)
::Thanks, someone else.  -- Zoe
----
:When dealing with a Crown Prince/ss of a state, use the form "{name}, Crown Prince/ss of {state}" unless there is a clear formal title awarded to a prince which defines their status as crown prince (eg, 'Charles, Prince of Wales', 'Felipe, Prince of Asturias', etc)
From Wikipedia:Naming conventions (names and titles). Is there a reason why this shouldn't apply to "Duke of Brabant"? --Jao 03:51, 26 Jan 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Japanese name

message: :
This looks funny, with one translation in parens and the other not; I'd make it .  I don't know how to make that nice with the language template. —Tamfang (talk) 03:37, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: idk if there's a mark as resolved button (??) but i fixed this 👍 Warpedtour08 (talk) 19:32, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  —Tamfang (talk) 04:48, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  parallels … 

message: At present the article lead had:
: Nevertheless, when a Japanese name is written in the Roman alphabet, ever since the Meiji era, the official policy has been to reverse the order. , the government has stated its intention to change this policy.
There are so many issues in that section that it seemed the only way to improve the article was to remove the text from the article.
* No sources are cited for what is claimed to be an official government policy.
* The 2019 Reuters article that is cited says "But beginning in the late 19th century, Japanese began adopting the Western custom of putting the given name first and family name second, at least when writing their names in English."  That makes in seem like a practice adopted by individuals, likely when corresponding with westerners, to reduce confusion. The Reuters article never mentions that the name order was "policy." The article is about a suggestion by a government minister to use the traditional Japanese name order. Other ministers agreed to study the issue. 
I thought about adding text to the article that when using Roman alphabet that some people follow the Japanese practice of writing the surname followed by the given name and others use the western practice of given name followed by the surname. I likely could have used the existing Reuters article though that one has weak support for that both versions of the naming order are in use. --Marc Kupper|talk 18:41, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I seem to remember reading that Abe Shinzo requested that foreign media stop turning names around. —Tamfang (talk) 05:24, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name order when using the Roman or English alphabet 

message: :
The while clause is puzzling.  If it means "this" is a misconception, what is "this"?  The preceding paragraph provides no obvious candidate.  My best guess is that "this" is what we are about to learn from Hearn (no wordplay intended), in which case while is inappropriate; I'd omit the preamble, or restructure the sentence thus:
:
But perhaps there is another explanation. —Tamfang (talk) 05:22, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  子 history
Talk:1993 Long Island Rail Road shooting

message: * 
* 
* 
Could be helpful in bringing the article up to date. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 03:45, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional sources 

message: There is no mention of the victims in the massacre, no listing of their names, nor photographs.
Also, the only sources are The New York Times articles that sit behind a pay wall.
What are you trying to hide? 71.105.117.76 (talk) 22:28, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Victims?
Wikipedia talk:Legal disclaimer

message: Add . Anarchyte (work | talk) 09:21, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: — xaosflux Talk 19:30, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit request 20 February 2016

message: : Since WP:NOLEGAL goes to this page, there should be a  notice at the top for WP:NLT Computer Fizz (talk) 10:00, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Done, but with  which is the correct template for such cases. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:42, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:   To make it more clear, instead of putting WP:NLT you should put Wikipedia:No legal threats. I just put WP:NLT cause it takes less time to type, i didn't mean that as the exact text. Computer Fizz (talk) 04:39, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: That's done. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:05, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request January 1 2020 

message: Please change "Nothing on Wikipedia.org or of any project of Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., should be construed as an attempt to offer or render a legal opinion or otherwise engage in the practice of law." to "Nothing on Wikipedia or any Wikimedia Foundation project should be construed as an attempt to offer or render a legal opinion or otherwise engage in the practice of law.". JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 22:44, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Why? If you are going to advocate changing a page, you should provide a reason to justify it. Mr248 (talk) 03:14, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: , The phrase "or of any project of Wikimedia Foundation, Inc" is phrased awkwardly. JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 12:15, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

text: . I don't feel comfortable making a content change like this to a page with legal considerations without a broader community discussion or review from the WMF. This wording has been in place since 2003. — The Earwig talk 20:01, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 25 January 2021
Talk:Klaatu (band)

message: Klaatu the movie character was based on the character of the same name in the Harry Bates story Farwell to the Master.  I am in favor of having separate Klaatu (character) and Klaatu (band) pages, as the character Klaatu is significant enough to have his own page (especially in light of the popularity of the Gort the robot and the movie The Day the Earth Stood Still).  I can write the Klaatu character page, but I don't know how to rename a node.
Nuffle 08:26, 12 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Movie Character

message: As an editor at Crawdaddy!, and to comply with COI guidelines, I am not posting the link to this new article about Klaatu. However, I would like to recommend it on its merits, and hope that an editor will find the time to examine the piece and—if he or she sees fit—post it to the external links section. The writer, Paul Myers, interviewed Dee Long for the piece. I appreciate your time. Crawdaddy! Mike harkin (talk) 20:00, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The Crawdaddy! link is dead. Varlaam (talk) 22:56, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  External link suggestion: New article about Klaatu 

message: The Wikipedia page concerns a US jazz label. I think that Klaatu's Daffodil label was Canadian.
Can someone please clarify? Varlaam (talk) 22:53, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Daffodil Records]]
Talk:Bush v. Gore

message: I was kinda amazed that it's almost impossible to tell from the article that the first half of the main decision - that Florida's recount system was unacceptable - was 7-2, not a partisan vote. The words "7-2" don't appear in the article. MikeR613 (talk) 21:13, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: 7-2
Talk:Eiffel Tower

message: It is a part of Paris, Banks of Seine which is a UNESCO World Heritage Site. Shouldn’t UNESCO World Heritage Site be written on that page? BeyazAtlıŞövalye (talk) 21:59, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  UNESCO World Heritage 

message: In the first paragraph, "Constructed from 1887, it is named after the engineer Gustave Eiffel, whose company designed and built the tower." "Constructed from 1887" seems like it should be a range such as "from 1887 to 1889" or "construction began in 1887" AsianAmericanVisibility (talk) 14:00, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: TigraanClick here for my talk page ("private" contact) 14:06, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 27 September 2023 

message: I read the article of the New York Times that this section sources, and did my own research, and I think the link between the activities of the CIC in Haiti and the Eiffel Tower is very convoluted. The CIC was not the only bank financing the Eiffel Tower, and the revenue from Haiti was very far from being the only source of revenue of the bank. The link the New York Times makes with the Eiffel Tower in their article is more an exaggeration to get a political message across than factual veracity, and I don't see the relevance of talking about Haiti here, as it is already explained in more fitting articles. Aurci (talk) 14:55, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Convoluted and surprising section about Haiti and the financing of the Eiffel Tower 

message: “There was multiple protests...”
Should read “There were...” 2001:5B0:2711:7498:E454:44EF:2494:9F37 (talk) 18:17, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Liu1126 (talk) 18:58, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 27 December 2023 

message: The official website has 1,665.
327 + 347 + (991) = 1,665.
It says 1,802 when opened.
360 + 380 + 1,062 = 1,802. 
Implies only one change: in 1983.
https://www.toureiffel.paris/en/news/visit/take-stairs-and-discover-eiffel-tower-new-way
Many sites say it opened with 1,710.
No site (that I could find) reliably cites 1,792.
One with 1,792, has a typo (in a different spot: 564, should be 364). It says changes were made in 1900. 
https://www.wonders-of-the-world.net/Eiffel-Tower/Renovations-of-the-Eiffel-tower.php
No site (that I could find) could tell me when the third level stairs were closed to the public. But 1900 seems likely. 
Note: there are 3 posts in Archives asking about Steps.
MBG02 (talk) 16:30, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Steps
Talk:Marlene Dietrich

message: The article names many people as having been her lovers but many lack citations. Lenbrazil (talk) 17:06, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations needed for many of her affairs 

message: In the article, the long list of her lovers is exclusively male. 2601:281:D880:7880:D935:74A0:6DCE:27DA (talk) 05:32, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it's not. We say she was bisexual, and we mention at least 2 women with whom she had affairs (Suzanne Baulé, known as Frede; and Mercedes de Acosta), and another (Edith Piaf) whose friendship with Dietrich was rumoured to be more than platonic. --  Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 10:10, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is she considered LGBT? 

message: The following statement isn't backed up by the reference provided at the end of this paragraph:
Dietrich created a fund with Billy Wilder and several other exiles to help Jews and dissidents escape from Germany. In 1937, her entire salary for Knight Without Armor ($450,000) was put into escrow to help the refugees. 
Which fund are you referring to here? The European Film Fund was started by Ernst Lubitsch in 1938, but Dietrich and Wilder were not involved in this. There is no information anywhere except for this Wikipedia entry that mentions her putting her entire salary for Knight Without Armor into escrow for refugees, and the Wikipedia page for Knight Without Armor list her salary for this film as $250,000 rather than $450,000. 77.191.5.179 (talk) 20:59, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where are you getting the information about her support for refugees?