lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Berabow Man

message: Gingerfield rocks, I already asked you to restore the redirect to Bravoman in your talk page, without putting an AfD notice yet (that would be, asking for the article to be deleted) but now I see you also have got WRONG information about the game itself...so just you know, Mr. "Namco expert", much of the NEC version trivia don't apply to the arcade version (I'm not telling you which). You even got the genre and controls section wrong on your table (again, I'm not telling you where, since you are the expert, right?). EpiVictor 14:55, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nice try, User:193.164.112.20, but there are more differences than the 6-button control system between the arcade version and the NEC one, so you have to do better than that to make Berabow Man an acceptable stand-alone article, with real information. I'm not saying that it can't be done, but you really need to work on it, and that frankly doesn't seem to suit you so far, but I hope I'm wrong. So far, the article it's just a duplicate of Bravoman done with Search & Replace and still no links to "Namco's own listings", and no real "focus on the original arcade version". EpiVictor 15:29, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stop remaking this article 

message: User:193.164.112.20, you have gone quite over the line now. First you treat us wikipedians as if we were born yesterday with that story about "you leaving wikipedia" and signing every comment exactly like Gingerfield Rocks e.g. How the bloody hell am I vandalising page x etc. and now you DARE remake "Berabow man" and ONCE AGAIN with a search&replace of Bravoman? This SHOWS man, it can be spotted a mile away and you are fooling none but yourself. The very least, I can propose the article for deletion again. EpiVictor 18:31, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Heh, I remembered this had been deleted the last time, and so I felt there was no need to pass through AfD again. Same mistakes, again: plain copy&pasting from Bravoman, without the slightest clue if everything (from names to description) applies to the arcade version too. The table on the right..."Genre: Retro"? "Unknown till MAME came out" ? Sorry man, these just don't cut it. EpiVictor 18:53, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  OK, that's quite enough
Talk:Bruntsfield

message: There is no district in Edinburgh called Churchill. Church Hill, on the other hand, does exist. I have made the appropriate changes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by  84.144.46.40 (talk • contribs) 15:58, 19 January 2006
:In agreement, I've just updated the second ref to Church Hill. (Above anon. poster is not me.) I'm also a bit unhappy about defining "Holy Corner" as a district; have previously made a small change to its own page. Kierant 15:04, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

message: Ideal Computing has been in Bruntsfield since 1996. It is the oldest computer store in Edinburgh that is still under its original ownership and some of the staff are still working there from the late 90s. The company itself now has 5 other locations around Edinburgh. Is it something that can be put onto the Bruntsfield page? I'm cautious about adding it to a page about the city, but is it relevant to the Bruntsfield page?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mreccles (talk • contribs) 15:01, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  adding a local shop
Talk:Ruthanasia

message: Why has someone (or is it a machine) put Citation Needed by some annotated quotes (eg Ken Douglas). Since the quote is headed by the name of the person who made it, why has it been tagged 'Citation needed'?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.198.145.187 (talk) 19:20, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not enough to have the person who said the quote. While it's probably correct - we have no way of knowing that the quote is not simply made up if it's not referenced. Ballofstring (talk) 21:14, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation Needed
Talk:Eastern rosella

message: The rosella is a parrot.  It lives in Australia and Tasmania.  It eats fruits, buds, nectar, insects, and grasses.
63.146.46.202 05:02, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Platycercus eximius diemenensis male.jpg and :File:Platycercus eximius diemenensis female.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on April 6, 2015. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2015-04-06. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:20, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I found that very irritating. There's no mention of Victoria, for example, where the subject of this article is widespread. Also there's no map. 😐 Melba1 (talk) 02:48, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Platycercus eximius diemenensis male.jpg]] and [[:File:Platycercus eximius diemenensis female.jpg]] to appear as POTD
Talk:Intellectual property in Romania

message: There is no such thing as a EU directive on SPCs. See Supplementary protection certificate and the legal basis section. --Edcolins 15:05, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accuracy 

message: Whoever is interested in this article and speaks Romanian, they may find this to be a particularly worthy source for the historical background, going back to the 19th century. Dahn (talk) 17:56, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Even older stuff
Talk:Gasparilla Island State Park

message: As there is currently no Gopher tortoise article, I recommend we stick with gopher tortoise until there is one. -- Dalbury(Talk) 19:39, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There are too many requests for gopher tortoise.  See: Special:Whatlinkshere/Gopher Tortoise.  ℬastique▼parℓer♥voir♑ 03:41, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Bat ray

message: Are bat rays the type of rays you get to touch in those touch tidepools?
Bibliomaniac15 19:10, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: Within its range, and in most scholarship, the common name used for the animal is "bat ray." FishBase's link to common names gives a U.S. common name of "bat ray" and a UK one of "bat eagle ray." I think the article should stay at "bat ray." Demi T/C 05:40, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Common name

message: — Assignment last updated by Gobearsbearsbears (talk) 04:15, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: California Natural History
Talk:Dani Pedrosa

message: Christophe, Nice job man. I wanted to add all the stats from his 125 and 250 years. You beat me to it. Excellent Job! Santy.raghavan 16:28, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You're wrong. He was born in Sabadell and lives in Castellar del Vallés. See MotoGP official website.
This can't be right: "Pedrosa experienced real racing at the age of 19...". Should this be 9, not 19?--Rubber Nipple Salesman (talk) 19:39, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

text: though it's all horribly unsourced. GedUK  07:18, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Although I do agree the accident is Pedrosa's fault. It seems a bit harsh in my opinion, although I do admit it's not the worse thing I've read about Pedrosa. Also, may I request that someone finds a source for the BBC commentator's opinion as well please.--Skully Collins 13:15, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Estoril '06 

message: If Pedrosa was born in the municipality of Castellar del Vallès, why does the article state he was born in Sabadell? AdeMiami (talk) 07:51, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthplace? 

message: A novice editor has tried to add "The Silent Samurai" prominently, as a nickname "...commonly addressed...by his followers and supporters worldwide".
There is no Google mention (in the first five pages) of this alleged nickname except for those referencing the Red Bull documentary video, created as an hommage to Pedrosa -  The Silent Samurai.
One (American ?) website asserts this was on the rear of his helmet, again heavily centred around the Red Bull film.
I don't think any time should be wasted on this.--Rocknrollmancer (talk) 23:02, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alleged nickname
Talk:Yarra Trams

message: * I am proposing we merge the article on KDR Melbourne into this article. Per [this Herald Sun article], it states "The name Yarra Trams will be retained by the new operator, KDR, but the branding will also be updated, costing $15 million." Thus, a merge may be required. Leaving this for discussion -- Sk8er5000 (talk) 20:41, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[KDR Melbourne]] merge
Talk:Voltage stabiliser

message: The linear regulator article covers the shunt and simple regulator types and also describes a few more regulator circuits (like IC regulators). The op-amp based stabiliser section may be added to the linear regulator article to make it more comprehensive with this article redirecting to it. -- Rohitbd 15:16, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

message: I think the Title: Voltage stabiliser should be redirected to Voltage regulator, but the content should be merged with Linear regulator. Jidan 06:25, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: Stabiliser or stabilizer?  The article is named "stabiliser," but everywhere the article says "stabilizer."  They're pretty close on Google (UK:1,030,000 US:936,000); Yahoo! is much more biased (UK:42,100 US:607,000) and suggests correcting "stabiliser" with "stabilizer."  The same bias occurs in Wikipedia's search (UK:1,905 US:19,428).  Voltage regulator links to "Voltage stabilizer" in its section on voltage stabilixers.  There is a disambiguation page Stabilizer (which doesn't link to this article and maybe should).  I would go with "stabilizer"
—Dmbrown00 02:39, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:Winch

message: When other wheels than the spool are pulling the rope, what are they called?
See http://flickr.com/photos/styrheim/207072869/
Abu ari 08:44, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other winding parts than the spool? 

message: Winches aren't just used on ships/boats but also on automobiles and and in various industries. The page should also discuss the different kinds of winch mechanisms (hand, PTO, electric, hydraulic).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.230.130.33 (talk) 23:41, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  needs more added 

message:  hopiakuta  Please do  sign  your  signature  on your  message.  %7e%7e   Thank You. - 14:30, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[ wiktionary : wince ]] [[ wiktionary : winch ]] [[ wiktionary : wench ]] 

message: Re this edit: I had a look for policy on WP:ELNO and found that "[a]ny site that does not provide a unique resource beyond what the article would contain if it became a Featured article" shouldn't be used. There's nothing there that couldn't be used here, and therefore the link isn't necessary, according to the policy. Does anybody know if there is a WP_wide policy on Knol? --Old Moonraker (talk) 08:53, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Knol]] article on "Winch" 

message: Advertisements for another website or -sites are embedded in the clickable navigation instructions (for instance, "HISTORY") in this article.
67.165.91.134 (talk) 15:12, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  BEWARE  EMBEDDED  ADVERTISEMENT  !
Talk:New Zealand Subantarctic Islands

message: As I understand it, all of these islands are uninhabited. But did the Maori, before the arrival of the Europeans, ever temporarily inhabit any of them, visit any of them or at least know about any of them? I'm just trying to figure "how far south" the Polynesians went. I know that they reached Stewart Island, and therefore I figure that they might at least have explored the waters further south. What do you say?
:Your question should be answered in the Auckland Islands article.--Ratzer 15:27, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I haven't found any source of Maori having lived on the Campbell Islands, which is further  south than the Auckland Islands, (or even on Macquarie Island, which is still further south), but from the fact that a Maori/Polynesian name exists for Campbell Island (Motu Ihupuku) I conclude that the Maori have known or visited it. It would be interesting to know if the Maori also knew or visited Macquarie Island.--Ratzer 17:41, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: comments from 2006
Template talk:Visual pathways

message: The visual pathway seems to be in disarray, mainly at "4°": (Optic radiation → Cuneus and Lingual gyrus of Visual cortex → Blobs → Globs). Since when was the Lingual gyrus one of the main input sources of the blobs of the primary visual cortex (Bodian area 17, also, apparently, called the Cuneus)? --JonathanWilliford (talk) 19:04, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Visual Pathway

message: Should these templates be better co-ordinated? 
Template:Sensory system
Template:Visual system
Template:Eye
Right now they they look kind of cluttered on the pages and they overlap strangely. --Birgitte§β ʈ Talk 15:27, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Template coordination
Template talk:Sensory system

message: Should these templates be better co-ordinated? 
Template:Sensory system
Template:Visual system
Template:Eye
Right now they they look kind of cluttered on the pages and they overlap strangely. --Birgitte§β ʈ Talk 15:28, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Coordination of templates

message: How about including electroreception in the template? Richard001 03:11, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Electroreception
Talk:Dục Đức

message: Need his birth name. Badagnani (talk) 19:16, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need birth name 
Talk:Electra (Sophocles play)

message: (1) Are we really going to perpetuate the absurd practice of putting the definite article before the names of plays – "The Electra", "the Philoctetes"? If Socrates wrote "the Electra", I suppose Shakespeare wrote "the Hamlet". (2) It seems likely that this play was the first in a trilogy: at line 17, the old slave mentions that it is dawn, and the play ends abruptly before resolving the fate of Aegisthus, so another play seems to be coming. Unfortunately, I'm not aware of a source that could be cited on this point. Wgrommel (talk) 19:32, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two small comments
Talk:Bersted

message: If the whole parish only has >8,000 people, should each village get its own article?  More people work at your average Wal-Mart.--Esprit15d 15:59, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: ah! but are they better off? Peter Shearan 10:55, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sadly no, no they aren't :) --Esprit15d 13:25, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

text: Okay, I'll put a merge tag on Shripney (Sussex rapid response unit!) ++ MortimerCat (talk) 21:03, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [[shripney]] merged here

message: Guidelines at Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements state that ideally the civil parish (Bersted) should be the catch-all article, avoiding single line articles on every village and landmark within the parish.
Therefore, I suggest villages within the parish (North Bersted and Shripney) to be merged and redirected to Bersted. ++ MortimerCat (talk) 21:12, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Merged ++ MortimerCat (talk) 13:56, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 
Talk:Brigade Nord

message: Having looked at www.mil.no, it appears that Brigade Nord no longer exists and has been replaced by an entirely new structure. It is very hard to make sense of this on the mil.no website, and rewrites not just of this but several other articles are needed. But I haven't had time to make sense of it all yet, and I'm not sure if the Norwegian military website is being deliberately opaque. --Leifern 15:59, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: According to this article, written 12 Sept 2006, Brigade Nord still exists. --Duffman 20:48, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Does it exist?
Talk:My Life with Master

message: Hello Percy. Why change "with" to "With"? Both the author and most players use a lower-case 'w', both in the full title and in the shorter "MLwM". I'm going to change it, but just tell me here if there's a reason for doing it your way and we can talk about it. Jonas Karlsson 16:00, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: GA review (see here for criteria)
#It is reasonably well written.
#:a (prose):  b (MoS): 
#:: 
#It is factually accurate and verifiable.
#:a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
#:: 
#It is broad in its coverage.
#:a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
#:: 
#It follows the neutral point of view policy.
#:Fair representation without bias: 
#:: 
#It is stable.
#:No edit wars etc.: 
#:: 
#It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
#:a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
#:: 
#Overall: 
#:Pass/Fail: 
#:: 
Waza (talk) 04:56, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

text: Many thanks for the comments.  I will try to deal with them, but unfortunately this review comes right as I am preparing to go away for almost a week.  As I said, I'll try to deal with them as best I can.  Of course, if need be, I can always fix them later and re-nominate the article for GA.  --Craw-daddy | T | 10:42, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Great article. With further expansion to make comrehensive and more work with the style guide I believe this could be raised to a Featured Article. Don't be afraid to use the book of the game itself as a reference if needed, while not good to have it as only or even main reference to the article but I believe it is totally appropriate to use it to support points about the game that may not be brought out in other sources, expecially if it has an introduction or designer notes. - Waza (talk) 03:41, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled
Talk:Tropical Storm Arlene (1993)

message: Sorry Storm05, but a good storm history doesn't mean the article should stay. I vote for a merge. Hurricanehink 16:07, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There's basically no notable information here. Jdorje 23:14, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Is it alright if I sharpen my axe? Hurricanehink 00:15, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep.  BTW, destruction the storm did while a tropical wave should not count in the total I think. Jdorje 01:11, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Merged. Hurricanehink 02:05, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: More impact. Hurricanehink 15:14, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Todo
Talk:Frailty (2001 film)

message: "However, the "God's Hand" killer is the real Fenton, who kept the bodies of his victims as trophies in his house basement." Why did Fenton kill people? I thought, Fenton did not believe in the visions of his father and brother... --Moscvitch (talk) 01:28, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Fenton was a serial killer and killed for pleasure, supposedly because he really was a "demon". Annie D (talk) 04:57, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. --Moscvitch (talk) 16:32, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, he was probably physcologically damaged by his father who killed the demons.Androo123 (talk) 22:04, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

text: Further to the previous statements, it is mentioned by Adam that Fenton killed in the name of the God's Hand killer in order to lure out Adam.Quoth Adam to Agent Doyle: "Fenton knew I'd come. That's why he left those notes to lure me in. I guess he figured when the killings made the news that I'd come for him. But I had to wait till God put him on my list." That Fenton used the nickname to lure out Adam is clearly mentioned in the article. Scoochi2 (talk) 22:16, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The "God's Hand" killer 

message: At the bottom of the page, at the details section, it says the rating is R (restricted +18). But I saw this movie at school, surely the teacher did not make us watch a R movie?!Androo123 (talk) 22:06, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I just checked the imdb page, it says the film's rated R there, too. Annie D (talk) 00:27, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rating of Movie 

message: Why is a link to this movie at the bottom of the article? Can someone explain the purpose to me? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.19.14.40 (talk) 01:50, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Greatest Game Ever Played?
Template talk:Ed right

message: Please use . 16@r (talk) 18:40, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: . עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 07:11, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Documentation

message: This is jumping lines in the documentation example given, looks like it is due to the newline after the noinclude section at the head of the code. Can somebody take it out (or document that it is supposed to jump down a line when used (& why?) as it does not look as if it is supposed to do it) - 88.104.130.64 (talk) 16:49, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: . There was a line break at the top of the template which I've now removed. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 20:01, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misalignment 

message: Is there a similar float right template to view? Jason Quinn (talk) 18:31, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is there a similar float right template to view?
Talk:D-subminiature

message: The article is inconsistent with regard to dashes in the name of these connectors, i.e. DB-25 or DB25? Caviare (talk) 01:03, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. All the designations could be standardised to have the dash/hyphen.  There is already a disambiguation page for DE9 and DE-9 redirects correctly to the D-Sub page.  This could probably be done with a page wide find and replace. Idyllic press (talk) 07:36, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dash or no dash? 

message: These two links, found via the DE-9 connector article history, list devices that used to be equipped with female and male DE-9 connectors, respectively:
* https://web.archive.org/web/20101219073208/http://pinouts.ru/connector/9_pin_D-SUB_female_connector.shtml
* https://web.archive.org/web/20101219071551/http://pinouts.ru/connector/9_pin_D-SUB_male_connector.shtml
I am not sure how they might be back into maybe this article, but here they are. —ReadOnlyAccount (talk) 16:57, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Digital archaeology, or anti-deletionism 

message: The positioning of the DF-104 entry in the table at the top of the article page seems to suggest this connector had the same shell size as the non-standard 19-pin connector, which it does not. Its shell is a lot larger.
The "DF-104" name suggests its shell was called an "F shell", which is not in source. Neither is the DF-104 name itself. Sources do describe this thing as a "104-Pin D-Sub" or "104-Pin D-type" connector and reference a military specification MIL-DTL-24308. That spec calls the shell a "Shell size 6". Another source mentions a "size 22". Even if some sources, not the mil-spec, but some sources call this connector a "D-Sub" one, it is questionable whether this large connector with a D-type shell ought to properly be considered a D-subminiature connector and included in the table. The military specification's earliest revision's date of publication appears to be 2 Nov 1999, which was after the first iMac came to market, which heralded the slow demise of D-subminiature connectors. Certainly this 104-pin connector was not part of the original crop of D-sub connectors and is more of a late related development for a niche market and special applications. One might ask whether its inclusion here, which stems from these edits is at all warranted, or if it belongs in the table as opposed to elsewhere in the article. One of those edits describes the connector as HD104, which is also not in source.I have found one source that advertises this thing as a "DB104HD" connector, but then says: "" 
Besides the usual "DB instead of D plus some other letter" gripe, it is not clear at all according to whom this connector might technically or officially be called DF-104, and in any case, the lack of common use speaks for itself.
I would have added  to the 104-pin connector's entry in the table, except the table's layout is already messed up enough by the  tag, and I'm not sure its entry will survive public scrutiny anyway. —ReadOnlyAccount (talk) 18:18, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  DF-104