Talk:Scientific Linux

message: The article claims support for PowerPC, SPARC and ARM. Current mirrors of SL only show i386 and x86_64, with a mention of IA64 in an earlier major release. Should the rest be deleted from the panel or marked "(obsolete)"? Gareth.randall (talk) 13:49, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: No longer supports architectures claimed in article

message: Why is this linking to an https?
--midorigin 15:02, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Website Link

message: Would someone like to list a few major points as to what separates this from other distributions?  i.e., what is missing that is commonly around, or what has been added that the sci community would like that regular distributions don't find appealing enough to add.  For instance, I was wondering if this had Root pre-installed (it better).
: About the ROOT, it's not included in SL. But, you can download binary ROOT for SL in ROOT web page. Ysyoon (talk) 08:42, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Packages

message: The diff between SL and RHEL are lited in the Release Note 
For instance lastRelease Note (4.4) is 
ftp://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/44/i386/SL.releasenote
:It is not clear from the article how this distribution differs. Why not just use RHEL or CentOS? Pgr94 (talk) 23:17, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Differences with RHEL 

message: Maybe it should be mentioned that when you try and go to the main SL page you get a "There is a problem with the websites security certificate" message that is worrying!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.171.161.230 (talk) 12:15, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see any problem with the latest main website cert issued 2009-04-03 (using Firefox 3.6.8). Gareth.randall (talk) 13:44, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  https://scientificlinux.org/ had a certificate which was issued by their own CA, or a CA provided by CERN, Fermilab or another research institution, and these root certificates are not always included with browsers. This isn't always a problem, and is more indicative that these institutions answer to a Government hierarchy which they control, not to Joedaddy Certificate Authority. Gigglesworth (talk) 20:38, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problems with website security certificate 

message: Due to the delays in CentOS 5.6, 6 and various security updates- there are a number of people migrating to SL from CentOS. Is this front-page worthy and sourceable from forum posts?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.16.61.8 (talk) 22:57, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  CentOS decline and rise in SL popularity 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Scientific Linux. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/Scientific-Linux-5-6-Live-released-1276856.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:29, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Scientific Linux. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110716025054/https://www.scientificlinux.org/distributions/roadmap to https://www.scientificlinux.org/distributions/roadmap
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:02, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified