Talk:Fable (2004 video game)

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Fable (video game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080417112438/http://www.computerandvideogames.com:80/article.php?id=90363 to http://www.computerandvideogames.com/article.php?id=90363
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:45, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Fable (video game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.1up.com/previews/fable_3
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140822065548/http://www.robosoftin.com:80/what-we-do to http://www.robosoftin.com/what-we-do#portfolio/mac
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140202203820/http://pixelvolt.com/2014/02/02/dont-overlook-fable-anniversary/ to http://pixelvolt.com/2014/02/02/dont-overlook-fable-anniversary/
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.1up.com/reviews/fable
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://uk.xbox.gamespy.com/xbox/fable/546898p1.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080912033633/http://www.metacritic.com:80/games/platforms/xbx/fable?q=fable to http://www.metacritic.com/games/platforms/xbx/fable?q=fable
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080725052750/http://www.gamespot.com/pc/rpg/fablethelostchapters/review.html to http://www.gamespot.com/pc/rpg/fablethelostchapters/review.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.1up.com/previews/fable-lost-chapters_7
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081205234953/http://www.gamespot.com:80/news/6111138.html to http://www.gamespot.com/news/6111138.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090203141853/http://www.gamespot.com:80/news/6121637.html?tag=result;title;1 to http://www.gamespot.com/news/6121637.html?tag=result;title;1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:35, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Fable (video game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081025182027/http://www.music4games.net/Features_Display.aspx?id=17 to http://www.music4games.net/Features_Display.aspx?id=17
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081024195656/http://www.metacritic.com/games/platforms/xbx/fablethelostchapters?q=fable to http://www.metacritic.com/games/platforms/xbx/fablethelostchapters?q=Fable
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:41, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This New York Times article  mentions the development time was three years and involved 80 people. While here it's mentioned 4 years and 70 people. Which source should we use here? Timur9008 (talk) 13:41, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Given they're from the same vintage and they're both mainstream publications, I wouldn't really privilege one over the other, especially since, especially for the time frame, they could be counting prototypes and the like in one count, but not the other. I think best choice here is include the range in the prose (70–80 people or 'roughly 80 people') or include the discrepancy in a  for max clarity. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 17:01, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  Timur9008 (talk) 17:14, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflicting  information