lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of mountains of the United States

message: Is there any interest in adding more data to expand this page beyond a simple list?  Even something as simple as the height of each peak could provide visitors with a great at-a-glance summary of local points of interest.  I think the little tidbits like labeling Whitney the contiguous U.S.' highest mountain are useful. How about states' highest peaks? 67.113.46.100 22:10, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What do you think about removing the Sierra Nevada sub-category under California? If we are going to separate which mountain range each mountain is in within the state, the list will get pretty big and potentially confusing (if you are scanning the list it is hard to tell Sierra Nevada is under california). --Rballou 15:30, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: California/Sierra Nevada

message: Should Granite Peak be listed under "Multiple States"? There are over 40 mountains in the United States named Granite Peak, including several in some of the same states. However, as far as I can tell, none of them belong to two or more states. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dcterr (talk • contribs) 04:02, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: But the article Granite Peak is a dab page, which covers all of them, hence Multiple States. If there are individual articles about notable Granite Peaks, that belongs in the individual state. hike395 05:20, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Multiple States

message: Should we somehow split the list out by state? hike395 (talk) 14:53, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  List getting long 

message: I corrected the Crestone Needle entry and the Blanca Peak entry, both under the Colorado section.  Crestone Peak, not Needle is the highpoint of the two; the situation was reversed on the page when I found it. Also, someone had Blanca Peak as a Stratovolcano.  This simply is not correct, Blanca is granite, which is igneous but intrusive, not extrusive as you find with a stratovolcano.
JH032774
USA mountains are beautiful gifts from god  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.1.63.31 (talk) 15:22, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corrections 
Talk:Hampden–Sydney College

message: @User:Wtzjr: lists of Greek institutions are better placed on list pages, since their content relevance for an encyclopedia is marginal. Also, there is not enough reliable documentation about them. Most Wikipedia editors agree that rote listings of Greek institutions are not helpful if there is no sourcing from outside the Hampden–Sydney homepage or the fraternity's own circle. In this case, the sourcing is particularly bad... all from the sam H-S site. If you can prove that one or more of the Greek houses is significant, then pls do so, but for the most part, individual houses fall under WP:UNDUE. That is, they are not significant enough for an encyclopdia. Here is an example of the lists, which are more appropriate. -- Melchior2006 (talk) 05:35, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, I'll take that as: "I agree, go ahead and streamline." -- Melchior2006 (talk) 08:17, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Laundry Lists of Greek Organizations
Category talk:Treaties

message: Should we create a template (e.g. a sidebar) for treaties? I was thinking, we could list their signing date, date of entry into force, number of parties, etc. 24.54.208.177 05:56, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: See Wikipedia:WikiProject Treaties and Template:Treatybox. 205.217.105.2 17:44, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Template

message: Is there any reason for so many treaties to be at the top level in this category, or can we subcat them  by chronological order and countries involved? -- Visviva 04:51, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Top-listing 

message: *:Category:Treaties by country
:*Self-explanatory and already established.
*:Category:Treaties by topic
:*:Category:Drug control treaties
:*:Category:Peace treaties
:*:Category:Military alliances
:*And so on.
*:Category:Treaties by organization
:*:Category:European Union treaties
:*:Category:Geneva Conventions
:*:Category:Hague Conventions
:*And so on.
*:Category:Treaties by war (Only in cases where multiple treaties were made during the course of the war)
:*:Category:Cold War treaties
:*:Category:Napoleonic Wars treaties
:*:Category:World War II treaties
:*And so on.
*:Category:Treaties by century (Only subdivide if necessary; avoid overcategorization)
:*:Category:1800s treaties
:*:Category:1900s treaties
::*:Category:1920s treaties
--Hemlock Martinis 20:49, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested category structure 

message: Should a sub-cat be created containing legal terms like Procès-verbal, reservation (law) and clausula rebus sic stantibus? I think many users might find it more convenient because otherwise Treaties probably conjures to mind specific agreements rather than a list of terms pertaining to the diplomatic process of negotiating treaties. --达伟 (talk) 17:46, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legal terms
Talk:Makrifat

message: This article is incomprehensible.  RickK 05:59, Apr 13, 2005 (UTC)
Try reading it in a thick subcontinent accent, it becomes somewhat clearer! I don't actually thing Makrifat is an actual word, certainly does not exist in the Hans Wehr Dictionary, perhaps the author meant Ma'rifah, meaning knowledge? --Baba farouq (talk) 00:29, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Zhengding County

message: The official travel page of the Shijiazhuang government () says that Zhengding is famous for its "three disappeared mountains, nine bridges with no water, nine floors, four towers, eight great temples and twenty-four golden steles" - Can anybody corroborate this saying and identify the sights by any chance? rm 07:52, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Official site

message: It might be true that Zhengding was
:originally Zhending
but there's no source, no mention in the history section, and no Chinese form in the infobox. I'll leave that here til someone adds some more details about that. — LlywelynII 11:10, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I've restored Zhending along with a source. -Zanhe (talk) 23:22, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Alt name
Talk:Battle of Allatoona

message: I realize that almost all, if not all, units were enormously under strength by this time, but I count five Union units ("regiments"). The total is given as a few thousand, or about 400+ per unit. Does this sound about right for this period? Student7 (talk) 18:12, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, although a regiment usually started the war with 1000 men, disease and battle casualties reduced them in size significantly. Unlike the practice in later American wars, losses were usually not replaced in existing units. New regiments were formed with new recruits. Hal Jespersen (talk) 18:53, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Under strength units?
Talk:David Alfaro Siqueiros

message: In the info box, the birthplace is stated as Chihuahua, Mexico
while in the introduction the following is stated:
It was long believed that he was born in Camargo in  Chihuahua state
Yet in the ==Early life== Section, we have a contradiction 
Thanks to art historian Raquel Tibol, who found a birth certificate for him, we know now that he was born in Mexico City, not Camargo or the state of Chihuahua.
The question now is, was he born in Chihuahua or Mexico City?
Someone with credibility please correct this confusing statements.RobiBuecheler (talk) 03:04, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthplace confusion 

message: It seems to have gotten even worse since that entry was made. Here's a direct quote from the article in which one sentence is immediately contradicted by the next:
"We know now that he was born in Mexico City, not Camargo or the state of Chihuahua. Siqueiros was born in Chihuahua in 1896".
I don't know anything about this figure, but somebody who does ought to weigh in and sort this out. 2601:18C:8D7F:D800:F089:FD46:D37A:2644 (talk) 03:14, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seconding the entry about birthplace confusion.
Talk:Rock in Opposition

message: I've created a redirect-link to this page from Rock in opposition --Bruce1ee 08:37, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect 

message: The list of bands in the "RIO as a genre" section is getting a bit long now. I believe it should only include a selection of prominent bands operating within this "genre". A suggestion for starters is that all red-linked bands be removed. Does anyone have any objections to this? --Bruce1eetalk 09:29, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: As no objections have been raised, I've removed all red-linked bands from the "RIO as a genre" section. --Bruce1eetalk 08:40, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of bands too long?
Talk:List of Mobile Suit Gundam SEED characters

message: Didn't notice that my login had timed out; the IP edit tagged "c/e"  was me. // ⌘macwhiz (talk) 02:40, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy edit 
Talk:188th Reserve Mountain Division (Wehrmacht)

message: Article reassessed and graded as stub. --dashiellx (talk) 19:16, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: Preserving here by providing this link; my rationale was: "non RS; excessive and unneeded orbat; unneed / uncited explanatory note". --K.e.coffman (talk) 03:45, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edit
Talk:Gil Heron

message: The text states that Gil Heron played 5 games for Celtic and scored twice but the summary in the box records 1 appearance and no goals.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Carmock (talk • contribs) 09:31, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Appearances and goals for Celtic 
Talk:Catullus 29

message: I think this should be transwikied to wikisource.--MaxMad 09:07, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)

message: line two of the translation (and in repetitions) the translation omits the conjunction et (and) in the original text. Instead of 'shameless insatiable gambler', perhaps shameless and a glutton and a gambler, which is closer to the true meaning...
Kenneth Charles 13:55, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  translation 

message: "so that worn-out organ of yours, Mentula"
"mentula", as far as I know, is Latin for "cock"; Mamurra is likened to one, it is not a name he goes by so as for it to be retained and capitalized in translation. The accurate translation for "ut ista vestra diffututa mentula" is "so that worn out cock of yours" simply. Lucius Domitius 04:25, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Being Prudish? 

message: I don't know of any ancient source which says that Catullus' father was a banker. Pending a reference for this, I have reworded the relevant passage. El barty 10:32, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was his father a banker?
Talk:Ŭ

message: The supposition that Ŭ was taken by L. L. Zamenhof from the Łacinka alphabet seems to be erroneous. Rather it must be the other way round. According to article "Belarusian Łacinka", by Mikałaj Pačakejeŭ, University of Cambridge, Darwin College, Cambridge Ukrainian Studies (CUS), archived at 2007 04 11 the sign was first used by the poet Francišak Benedykt BAHUŠEVIC in his 1891 debute collection. Well, the first book on Esperanto, the so-called "Unua libro", emerged in 1887. Therefore the "Zamenhof hypothesis" must be changed. Wheter Bahuševic got his inspiration from Zamenhof (Esperanto was quite popular in Eastern Europe at the time, and Bahuševic's precedessors used a letter more similar to ú or û) or the two Ŭs developed independently, I cannot say, but both possibilities should at least be pointed out in the article. Bab from the Esperanto Wikipedia --129.177.202.170  09:32, 13 Apr 2005‎ (UTC)
:There does appear to be some doubt. I've added a paragraph to the article. Jordi·✆ 12:30, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ŭ in Belarusian Łacinka first publicly used in 1891?
Talk:Park Inn by Radisson Berlin Alexanderplatz

message: Note: this hotel was the "Hotel Stadt Berlin" until around 1990 and since around 2002 (?) is the "Park Inn Alexanderplatz". Ianb 10:04, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Antineutron

message: Could someone please verify the statement "composed of anti-quarks down down up." The change was made by 207.218.152.146, who has vandalised other pages. Depending on whether 207.218.152.146 is a dynamic IP or not, the addition of that statement might be some sneaky vandalism.
Someone42 10:16, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possibly vandalism? 

message: The "Other Characteristics" section doesn't really mention any new facts--the similarity to neutrons in mass and (lack of) charge has already been mentioned, as has the difference in magnetic moment. Anyone object to my deleting it? 65.213.77.129 (talk) 20:53, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  other characteristics? 

message: Could we list the measured as opposed to predicted properties ? 
How was it discovered (interactions seen, or existence inferred ?) ? Are they too hard to produce to directly determine a half life ? - Rod57 (talk) 10:18, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Could we list the measured as opposed to predicted properties
Talk:Biberach an der Riß

message: I’ve moved this per WP:UE to an English title that dispenses with the eszett; it is entirely wrong to use it in general english.
Also, it seems a little obtuse to use an eszett here when the town's own website (http://www.biberach-riss.de/ ) doesn’t do so. Moonraker12 (talk) 14:24, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move 
Talk:British E-class submarine

message: I don't see how it can be correct to refer to these vessels as HMS/HMAS_____, as in the links in the article. The E/AE- numbers are pennant/serial numbers. I have just moved the Australian ones to "Australian submarine AE1" and "Australian submarine AE1".Grant65 (Talk) 10:51, Apr 13, 2005 (UTC)
:The naming convention is at Wikipedia:Naming conventions (ships) and has been discussed on the talk page.  "H.M. Submarine" was not an uncommon form, see the citation for Martin Eric Nasmith and the caption for .  The Australian War Memorial uses HMAS AE2.  The AE1 and AE2 articles must be getting dizzy by now, they've been moved back and forth that many times. Geoff/Gsl 11:15, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)

message: This article might be long, but it's pretty thin. Most of it is just a list of the E-class submarines, while the only real info is in the beginning of the article. 
For example, the article mentions that improvements were made to class, but not what was improved, or how. 
I'm not certain of the rules for a stub though (and too lazy right now to look them up), so if any of you agree with me that this should be a stub article, feel free to add the correct template.--Wolf of Thor (talk) 03:23, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stub? 

message: The Seawar Museum in Jutland has a conning tower that they identify as belonging to E-50, which they describe as being lost on 31 January 1916 after hitting a mine. E50 had apparently not been launched by then, and this article on the class has no vessel lost on that day. Here is a link to the Danish website (in English), with a picture of the conning tower: http://www.seawarmuseum.dk/en/U-50-forside-historie Acad Ronin (talk) 12:44, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Identification issue outside my expertise

message: The image of the model of the E-class submarine appears to show two guns (one forward, one aft), but the text describes only one gun implemented, and only for Groups 2 and 3.   I looked at images for all E-class subs and found no aft guns for any.  2600:6C48:7006:200:D84D:5A80:173:901D (talk) 04:36, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discrepancy between text and model 

message: Considering the final disposition of each of the boats in this class of submarine, I can't say I would call this fleet of British subs "successful".    Many were sunk or destroyed or otherwise lost. Ships destroyed or tonnage lost to adversaries is missing in most cases.  Compared to the German sub force, IMO this E-class was a failure.   I'm not a historian, but I gather this from just reading the WP articles of the history of each boat deployed of this series.   I'd rather hear more from others more familiar with this series on the issue of performance versus their adversaries.   2600:6C48:7006:200:D84D:5A80:173:901D (talk) 04:47, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Performance/History
Talk:Naddodd

message: The spelling barely exists in Google (most references are based on wikipedia copies too).  Althoughthe alternative spelling is barely used too. Lotsofissues 11:02, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not going to say that this is the correct English spelling of his name but I doubt that this person in general has any presence at Google because it is a small and barely known figure only related to Icelandic history. --Bjarki 12:52, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I mean, we should use the modern spelling Naddoddur because it is still a name for boys in the Faroe Islands. This name only occurs there, which means, nobody in Iceland or Norway has such a name (or in similar variations). However, he was not only related to Icelandic history but also to the Faroese history and propably he was in America before Erik the Red. Arne List 15:45, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Satires (Juvenal)

message: Linking to Junius from his name is not appropriate, as there is no correlation between the two at all. Chris Weimer 16:35, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Quite correct, I agree and have removed this link.--Nefasdicere 18:21, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Also taken care of in the new version.--Nefasdicere 18:21, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

text: I do not see a problem with such a link, although the (apparently personal) page linked may not be as stable as a site under the control of an academic or other entity.  If there is any more support for this, I will add it.--Nefasdicere 18:21, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [Untitled] 

message: This article has this word translated as "Russians". Isn't it "Sarmatian"? Wouldn't that be a more correct translation? Russian would be anachronism - Russians (as they define themselves) and their country didn't exist when Juvenal was alive. Sarmatians aren't the same people, AFAIK. Peter1968 09:09, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, I just popped in on this page to see if anybody else felt annoyed by it. Let's DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT!!!! ;-) Trigaranus 22:29, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sauromatas 

message: This article has some possible plagiarism in the first sentence of the significance section, and...actually a lot of this. It's bugging the hell out of me...and I can't think of what book it's from, but, also, this isn't very encyclopedic at all, and it's not NPOV at all (debate exists about the merits of relativism when studying Juvenal, etc.) Ooh, I think it's mostly from Susanna Braund's books on the satires, especially since the structural breakdowns are wholly lifted from there (other commentary doesn't follow the pattern given for satire 8). If I weren't supposed to be writing a paper on this right now, I'd fix it. 64.9.54.53 (talk) 01:06, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Plagiarism

message: The article gives witty titles to the individual satires "There's no room in Rome for a Roman", "Patronizing patronage", etc. These aren't ancient - both of the titles just quoted are English puns. Where do they come from and why is this article perpetuating them? Furius (talk) 22:56, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Titles 

message: I don't really see why this is necessary and it kind makes the article a little clunky, I think it might be better to just summarize the books Drgerke (talk) 19:22, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right. I still think that the witty titles for the individual satires should go - they're WP:OR. The various references to Early Modern reception (Rousseau etc) should be in a reception/legacy section, not incorporated in the synopsis Furius (talk) 22:40, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quotes from each Books, not really necessary
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Color

message: Hello,Please note that Color calibration, which is within this project's scope, has been selected as one of the Articles for improvement. The article is scheduled to appear on Wikipedia's Community portal in the "Articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing! 
Delivered by — MusikBot talk 00:05, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement! 

message: Looking for some input for the following color articles:
* Talk:Color_theory#This_article_needs_direction
* Talk:Standard_illuminant#Merge_proposal
Curran919 (talk) 14:05, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  color article input requests 

message: Anyone able to help get:
 Transcribed?
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 00:55, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: To be honest I don't really see the point. Anyone curious can just look at the scan. It can even be OCR'd. If you wanted to make this useful for modern times, you could try to put all of the color names into a database of some kind, but Wikisource isn't capable of hosting something like that. –jacobolus (t) 01:31, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Ideally, the transcription should ultimately also be into Wikidata, assuming someone is able to convert the color references into RGB triplets or xyY values. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:11, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  A request for efforts on Wikisource..
Talk:Archduchess Marie Valerie of Austria

message: The bridge was hand over Sept 28, 1895 at first time; and it's really name for Archduchess Marie Valerie with Franz Josef's permission. The bridge is between Esztergom in Hungary and Párkány in Slovakia. Its lenght was 496 meter in 1895, now it's 514 meters.
== A dubious statement ==
Valerie's solemn renunciation of her rights to the Austrian throne, which was necessary for the marriage to proceed, took place on July 16, 1890 at the Hermes Villa.
I seriously doubt this is true. First of all, the Archduchesses had no succession rights to the Austrian throne. Also, her husband was an Archduke of Austria himself and was in the line of succession. I don't see why the renunciation was necessary, is she had any succession rights at all. Surtsicna (talk) 21:24, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: ==

message: Valerie's solemn renunciation of her rights to the Austrian throne, which was necessary for the marriage to proceed, took place on July 16, 1890 at the Hermes Villa.
I seriously doubt this is true. First of all, the Archduchesses had no succession rights to the Austrian throne. Also, her husband was an Archduke of Austria himself and was in the line of succession. I don't see why the renunciation was necessary, is she had any succession rights at all. Surtsicna (talk) 21:24, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  A dubious statement
Talk:Johnson & Wales University

message: This part of the article is largely unsourced; the references are only to other lists and don't convey information of encyclopedic value. There are Wikipedia pages which list Greek life at any given university or college; this is not the place for them. I propose deletion. -- Melchior2006 (talk) 06:00, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Since no one chimed in on this one, I will go ahead and streamline. --Melchior2006 (talk) 03:44, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greek life