Talk:Brazilian Navy

message: Atention, brazilian contributors, "corporal" in english means "cabo", army's rank below seargent, in portuguese. So, "corporal punishment" is nonsense, and doesn't mean "castigo físico". The proper expression is "phisical punishment"
:Corporal punishment is a perfectly valid English expression, and it means exactly that. 96.35.171.223 (talk) 05:20, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  English Vocabulary 

message: It should be noted that Brazilian Marines (Fuzileiros Navais, which translates loosely to Naval Riflemen) are the second largest such force in the world.
:I edited the article.LtDoc 23:36, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brazilian Marines 

message: If you want to change something, please show the intention here first.LtDoc 22:46, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The change I made, as stated in the history description, was a factual correction. The Tikuna is not  a nuclear submarine. Visit the navy's website (in Portuguese) or GlobalSecurity.org's website for confirmation of this. The Tikuna is considered the "midpoint" to the nuclear submarine.--Dali-Llama 17:26, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changing the Article 

message: The article is being updated to include the template for the Brazilian Navy. And other update included to improve the sections. New pages created and linked to the main article.Chanakyathegreat (talk) 13:47, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update 

message: I think the see also for WWII should be removed because the article hasn't been made yet. It doesn't seem like it belongs. Feelings? Coralshin (talk) 20:03, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  WWII 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on Brazilian Navy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110524071319/https://www.mar.mil.br/menu_v/sinopse/Complemento/complemento_26012009.htm to https://www.mar.mil.br/menu_v/sinopse/Complemento/complemento_26012009.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120730122050/http://unifil.unmissions.org/Default.aspx?tabid=1499&ctl=Details&mid=3103&ItemID=15777 to http://unifil.unmissions.org/Default.aspx?tabid=1499&ctl=Details&mid=3103&ItemID=15777
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110524071319/https://www.mar.mil.br/menu_v/sinopse/Complemento/complemento_26012009.htm to https://www.mar.mil.br/menu_v/sinopse/Complemento/complemento_26012009.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091215061104/http://www.mar.mil.br/menu_v/cm/comandantes_republica_mb.htm to https://www.mar.mil.br/menu_v/cm/comandantes_republica_mb.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20170325232014/http://revistaepoca.globo.com/Revista/Epoca/0%2C%2CEMI14439-15273-2%2C00-UMA%2BNOVA%2BAGENDA%2BMILITAR.html to http://revistaepoca.globo.com/Revista/Epoca/0%2C%2CEMI14439-15273-2%2C00-UMA%2BNOVA%2BAGENDA%2BMILITAR.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041105153932/http://atlasgeo.span.ch/fotw/flags/br_minma.html to http://atlasgeo.span.ch/fotw/flags/br_minma.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070712135236/http://ommb.com.br/ to http://www.ommb.com.br/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:40, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The file :c:File:CT Greenhalgh D24.jpg has been nominated for deletion on Commons 
 Reason: This file was initially tagged by Articseahorse as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: According to the Brazilian Copyright Law (Lei 9.610 de 19 de fevereiro de 1998; See translation) Article 44: The economic rights in audiovisual and photographic works shall be protected for a period of 70 years from the first of January of the year following that of their disclosure; Article 96: The term of protection of neighboring rights shall be 70 years from the first of January of the year following fixation for phonograms, transmission for the broadcasts of broadcasting organizations and public performance in other cases. Hence, this media file is under no copyrights. See Recursos no domínio público. 
 Deletion request: link 
Message automatically deposited by a robot - -Harideepan (talk) 13:23, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  File nominated for deletion on commons 

message: : I have removed your addition from the lede section. It is obviously not important enough to be presented in the lede per WP:UNDUE. It could, however, be mentioned in the main body of the article, in the section "Brazilian Navy today". There are several sources in the article about the ship that can be of use. Regarding presentation of future events, please read WP:CRYSTALBALL. Instead of saying things like "NN will do this and that...", it should be "NN have stated that they will do..." or similar. Also, please used a piped link like HMS Ocean to link directly to the ship and not to the list of ships called "HMS Ocean". --T*U (talk) 13:18, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Purchase of aircraft carrier 

message: I've stated that it is an aircraft carrier and then it was changed to helicopter carrier. A helicopter carrier is an aircraft carrier.101.178.163.208 (talk) 06:06, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Exactly. You had first stated that the ship is an aircraft carrier, then that it is a helicopter carrier. No need to say the same thing twice. Helicopter carrier is the more precise term. --T*U (talk) 05:27, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent change 

message: I've noticed that most of the articles about ships in the Brazilian Navy are titled "Brazilian <shiptype> <Ship Name>", e.g. Brazilian tanker Almirante Gastão Motta. These end up being awkwardly long, and usually unnecessarily so: there are no other pages named Almirante Gastão Motta. Per WP:COMMONNAME, these should all use the simple name of the ship when the name is unambiguous. When it is ambiguous (e.g. Brazilian battleship Minas Geraes, it would be simpler to disambiguate with parantheses: Minas Geraes (battleship). Not only is this shorter, but it works better with the wiki software's automatic pipe support. None of the pages I looked at seem to use the prefix in the text, suggesting that it's not part of the ships' official names. Is there some history behind the "Brazilian <shiptype>" prefix that I'm not aware of? pburka (talk) 00:09, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm no mod or admin, but it seems like a good idea. Bernardo2708 (talk) 13:03, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ship article prefixes 

message: Hello everyone,
We create a Brazilian Navy task force on pt.wiki where we are creating and improving many content related to the Brazilian Navy. We finished a complete review and upgrade on the Brazilian Navy article on pt.wiki. I guess a complete translation could be applied to improve this article on en.wiki. Rodrigo Padula (talk) 12:28, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brazilian Navy proposed for featured article on pt.wiki