lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Honda Concerto

message: Hey is does anyone know how 2 change or were excally is the fuel fillter in my 1991 honda concerto 
thanks  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.57.168.251 (talk) 00:11, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  can anyone tell me were the fuel fillter is in my 1991 honda concerto? 
Talk:Horst Liepolt

message: I have just posted this, my first Wiki article. Much of the content is from recent conversations with Horst Liepolt in New York as well as personal memories and recent research. I will probably be adding some extra information soon.
Boothman123 14:43, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: New Article

message: Re: The above comment about Biographies of Living Persons. 
In case this was a query regarding the legitimacy of the information presented here, this article is very well sourced. As well as the references mentioned in the article I have also gained much information from magazine articles and advertising brochures from the times involved, both from Sydney Australia and also from New York. I have also interviewed a large number of people, especially including Horst Liepolt himself, to whom I sent a copy of the text for his perusal and comment before I posted it here.
Also: "Horst Liepolt" has recently been changed to "Liepolt" at the start of the biography section and social matters section. I checked a few other well known biographies (eg Miles Davis, Francis Crick etc) and the full names were used in similar areas of the articles. To me this just sounds more polite, and as far as I can see does not break any Wikipedia rules of protocol so I've changed it back.
Boothman123 15:23, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Lotus Excel

message: Why is there a future section?  I've tidied it up, but it seems like this belongs under the "Lotus" category and not under specific cars.  Suggest removing it. --86.16.190.232 (talk) 22:29, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed. Hotlorp (talk) 14:18, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

text: I think you may want to do another edit and remove what you've added, because this looks like rubbish and you've destroyed the layout of the article. Better learn about Wikipedia editing and standards before going ahead. You even managed to muck up the wiki-code on this talk page, which I've fixed. SeverityOne (talk) 08:49, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

message: I was browsing through scans of old Motorweek Rivals segments and came across a quick blurb about the 1986 Excel SE stating that it produces 190 bhp, not 180 (Torque is listed as the same 165). I'm wondering if this is an error/misprint on their part, or whether the article is wrong. Most online sources seem to quote the 180hp figure. Here's a link  to the picture of the Motorweek section.  TKOIII (talk) 20:10, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll see what other period published sources say when I get a minute. Nudge me in a week if there is no response; I may be pinned under a stack of old Auto Katalog.  Mr.choppers | ✎  20:41, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  1986 Excel SE horsepower
Talk:Isuzu Oasis

message: This article is of seriously dubious value, given that the vehicle's distinctions with it's progenitor, the first generation Honda Odyssey are so faint as to have been overlooked.842U (talk) 01:13, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Then should we merge it w/ the Odyssey article?140.182.174.41 (talk) 18:31, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: I propose merging this article into Honda_Odyssey_(North_America)#First_generation_(1995–1998), The Oasis is a rebadged version and given the no sources here IMHO it'd make sense to merge,
I'm utterly hopeless with merging so would rather leave it to someone who can, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 18:55, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Pinging a few who've edited the article or talkpage: , Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 19:00, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

text: Yeah, looks like a good merge candidate.  If there are no objections, I can do the merge. --Vossanova o< 15:37, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

text: Merge completed. --Vossanova o< 22:09, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Mercury Colony Park

message: 1983 was the first year the full-size Fords and Mercurys were made with fuel injection. The first year for the Ford F-Series and Bronco with the fuel-injected 302 was 1985. The 300 cu in straight 6 followed in 1987 and finally the 351 and 460 engines in 1988.--Kevjgav (talk) 01:44, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  4.9 given Fuel Injection in 1983
Talk:Daewoo Espero

message: In what way is the Espero related to the Passat?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.6.144.251 (talk) 14:19, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Passat? 

message: Why are the UK, The Netherlands, Spain and Australia mentioned in the overview of where it was produced despite the car not being produced in any of these countries? Shouldn't it be moved to the main article? Barleria (talk) 23:39, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you referring to the sections regarding the car as sold in those markets? Maybe that could be made clearer, but I am also not sure what your question is. Thanks,  Mr.choppers | ✎  23:57, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Countries section 

message: This article has many inconsistencies regarding to the term production. "Production" means "assembly or fabrication". In the article, the term is being used to refer to import from overseas. Therefore, it must be clear that this car was never produced in Brazil or Iran, for instance. The Esperos sold in these country were all imported from South Korea.
Also, the Social Culture and Design quirks subsection does not present any relevant information to the article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Victorgomes (talk • contribs) 23:16, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistencies
Talk:Kia Carens

message: The Kia Carens Page needs to be updated badly. When done, may I ask that it be a view not based on the Rondo/Carens of any country in particular. Thanks much! Lovemykia (talk) 02:19, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

message: The scope of the article should be expanded to include the Hyundai Touring, which has an identical body and probably similar mechanicals. 99.40.198.205 (talk) 04:04, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hyundai Touring 
Talk:Ford Everest

message: This article is not stub now.
Low importance, this model is sold in few countries and almost unrelated. -- Love Krittaya (talk) 07:09, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rating 

message: Next Everest is 2022 U704,  sharing with U725 Bronco and heavily with P703 Ranger. I am not going to provide any sources, because that is not worth risking nor is such priviledged information permitted for publication. Carmaker1 (talk) 18:36, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  U704
Talk:Big Potato

message: Yes, this is a serious redirect, Moscow is sometimes called the Big Potato, just like New York is called the Big Apple. The potato is big stuff over there.
*Now it's a disambiguation page. There are several more things that are called Big Potato, with a couple that don't have Wikipedia articles... yet. 147.70.242.54 (talk) 19:39, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Wattasid dynasty

message: Somebody's mucked up the caption, entirely on purpose  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.67.52.101 (talk) 11:53, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: *this article and kingdom of Fez -should be Fes- speak about the same thing. --Tachfin (talk) 05:55, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 
Talk:Fiat Fiorino

message: * If the Citroen and Fiat articles are merged what is the proposed name of the new article? Boatman (talk) 17:07, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This is good point, I think the merge isnt good option, Ill remove the merge tags...   -->Typ932 T·C 11:12, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of merged article

message: To the anonymous ip who spends a lot of time flopping images around ad infinitum: There is no rule saying that the most recent generation should be used. However, using a Peugeot to illustrate "Fiat Fiorino" is clearly problematic. Please discuss before you re-revert again.  Mr.choppers | ✎  14:50, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 
Talk:Lancia Ypsilon

message: Lancia to create the new Ypsilon on the Fiat 500 Giardinera platform.
http://green.autoblog.com/2009/11/23/lancia-to-create-the-new-ypsilon-on-the-fiat-500-giardinera-plat/
Soon will be also Chrysler Ypsilon 2013. 
http://www.allpar.com/cars/adopted/fiat/chrysler-fiat-alliance.html  
http://www.italiaspeed.com/2009/cars/lancia/11/new_lancia_models/0611.html
The FIAT 500 Giardiniera platform 240cm wheelbase. 3 motors: New SGE twin 900CC, 1.4L multi air gas, 1.6L multiJet II diesel. + start & stop technology. New Ypsilon will only be a 5dr.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66coronet (talk • contribs) 11:26, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lancia to create the new Ypsilon on the Fiat 500 Giardinera platform 

message: Much of the English in this article is dreadful - presumably it's been written by someone with English as a second language, as these cars are largely absent from English speaking countries. I'll add a copyedit template. --Ef80 (talk) 19:56, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quality of English 

message: The car is in Production and was approved Euro6D Temp according to official Lancia press
http://www.lanciapress.com/actionphp/download.php?id_brand=2&filename=2018%2FLANCIA%2FListini%2F181107_Lancia_Ypsilon_Listino.pdf&type=attach&subtype=price  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.252.144.203 (talk) 09:02, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is in production
Talk:Kia Concord

message: "The name "Concord" represents the harmony between Kia's passion over half a century and the new technology that creates the best automobiles." Really? Not for the deal allowing Kia to use the Mazda platform...?  TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura  23:10, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I went ahead and deleted that part - even if this had been the "official" reasoning, it would be meaningless marketing speak. And remaining unreferenced after 19 months makes this an easy decision.  ⊂| Mr.choppers |⊃  (talk) 00:25, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Faster than the speed of money?
Talk:Hyundai Trajet

message: How can Trajet and Carnival compete with Previa? In comparison, the price of Trajet in Indonesia in 2008 was about 200-250 million rupiahs (about 18.000-20.000 US dollar), but Previa was more than 800 million rupiahs (about 72.000 US dollar) in Indonesia at the same year. By the way, Carnival has not been sold in Indonesia since 2004/2005, and at that time, the price was about 250 million rupiahs. RaymondSutanto (talk) 17:09, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trajet and Carnival vs Previa? 

message: Article needs updating as it's written in the present tense as if model is still currently sold by Hyundai (listing price etc).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.108.99.124 (talk) 12:30, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tense needs updating 

message: 8 seater? Unless the article is talking about a specific model its incorrect, they are a standard 7 seater family car  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.57.164.2 (talk) 22:59, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: seats
Talk:Ford Fusion (Europe)

message: To anyone adding from other sources, please don't plagiarise and copy word for word from blogs like this one in question.
http://best-car-styling.blogspot.com/2009/12/new-ford-fusion-car.html
I have deleted the offending section as it offered no sources, was almost an exact copy, and bought nothing useful to the article other than the names of a couple competitors.
Thanks Jenova20 10:02, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Plagiarism
Talk:Kia Bongo

message: Perhaps there should be some mention that these are also very popular in the middle east.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Myhre3 (talk • contribs) 20:02, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
Talk:GMC Sprint / Caballero

message: I deleted the stub tag, since this article has been substantially updated - if some bot adds it back on, though, I promise not to cry...too much. It should be noted as well that my main reference source (Gunnell's SCoALT) is inconsistent and conflicts with some of the information previously presented here and with that of Kelley Blue Book, so the result is a bit of a mishmash. I'll look into it a little further and attempt to clarify if I can - problem is that there's not much research specifically devoted to the Caballero, which makes things tougher. I may also adjust the yearly rundown into something less ungainly - maybe a table for the engine data so I can adjust the headings into a range of years instead. Suggestions welcome, of course. Duncan1800 (talk) 09:24, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Running a second draft now, but I do have to sleep at some point. More to come... Duncan1800 (talk) 13:27, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Second draft basically complete. If anyone has any reference material (brochures, magazine articles of any kind, other reference works) about the Caballero, please post here and let me know. Also, PHOTOS are desperately needed - a basic photo for the header (to replace the El Camino), and one each for the Amarillo (or Laredo) and Diablo. A shot of the distinctive "Caballero" badge would also be appreciated if possible. I have posted a photo request as well. Thanks in advance! Duncan1800 (talk) 09:42, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Revision
Talk:Fiat Sedici

message: The sources cited for 2010, 2011 and 2012 had the URLs for earlier years, and I couldn't find this data by modifying the URLs or searching the site. Automotive News Europe says 16,505 sales in 2010, which is the same number given as production here (it also says sales of 31,855 in 2007, compared with production of 34,522 here), so it may be that different sets of statistics have been used in this section of the article. Peter James (talk) 20:56, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Production 

message: Lancia Pangea can’t exist! The source isn’t real, and cite a photoshop based on Fiat Sedici!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.98.106.80 (talk) 22:29, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Given that the cited source outright stated that the car didn't exist, you're right - the "Lancia Pangea" should not appear in the infobox. --Sable232 (talk) 21:19, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lancia Pangea
Talk:Chevrolet Opala

message: The lead of the article notes that the 151cu engine is "usually mistaken" as the GM Iron Duke engine, yet everywhere else in the article, it states that engine was in fact used.  Which is it?  I can't seem to believe that it was used as early as 1974, as GM didn't use it in their American cars until at least 1977. --Vossanova o< 19:05, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Iron Duke engine 

message: This entire article seems to have translation problems. Some of it is awkward. Some of it makes no sense. For instance, the word 'enscenated' isn't part of the English language- at least it's not in the OED, and I'm not sure what the writer was trying to convey. There's also a description of an introduction 'spectacle' involving the presence of Stirling Moss during 'counting.' Either the word 'spectacle' is misused, or more likely, the nature of this 'counting' isn't clear in English. 
As I have a feeling this is a translation from a Portuguese page, someone fluent in both Portuguese and English should work with the editors on improving this to get the ideas across in a more natural way in English. 
99.24.218.69 (talk) 01:28, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  General 

message: I have added citation requests to the sections dealing with the Opala's "Holden styling" and it US collectability. These statements sound like original research. Any perceived similiarity to Holden models is more likley to be the result of international GM styling trends of the time rather than any direct Holden connection. GTHO (talk) 00:06, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Holden connection
Talk:Chevrolet Tavera

message: Chevrolet Tavera is not longer sold in Indonesia. It discontinued about 3 or 4 years ago. RaymondSutanto (talk) 05:54, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Discontinued
Talk:Isuzu Panther

message: what is this language? Its clearly not english  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.93.40.51 (talk) 16:35, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Isuzu Leopard and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 15#Isuzu Leopard until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Andra Febrian (talk) 05:04, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Isuzu Leopard" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Virtual temperature

message: It is important to distinguish between the term partial pressure as used in meteorology and elsewhere in physical science, as the AMS Glossary explains. Since the Wikipedia page for water vapor pressure uses the definition common in physics of the saturation pressure, it is inappropriate to link to that page and confusing to use the term vapor pressure of water when partial pressure is meant. 
Drphysics (talk) 23:10, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vapor pressure versus partial pressure 

message: The introduction includes a statement about how the virtual temperature concept is affected by the onset of saturation. The statement (see below) is a confusing, and it is nowhere addressed in the wiki page. 
"The virtual temperature of unsaturated moist air is always greater than the absolute air temperature, however, the existence of suspended cloud droplets reduces the virtual temperature."
The confusing part of the statement is: "the existence of suspended cloud droplets reduces the virtual temperature". How can a physical process reduce a corrected temperature? Maybe the intention was to indicate that the virtual temperature concept does not account for saturation, and if it were to account for saturation, the revised virtual temperature would be less than the nominal value. 
----MuTau (talk) 14:44, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  RE: Introduction
Talk:Ford DN5 platform

message: This is not quite accurate as written.  The original 1986 Taurus was the DN5 platform.  D186 refers to a later update (mid 90s IIRC).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.0.186.90 (talk) 17:07, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with this IP user. The D186 is the 4th generation Taurus and Sable manufactured from October 1999 to October 2006, which was replaced by the Volvo-based D3 in 2004. The fact that no one has noticed this nor has cared to, but instead favor harassing me and other well meaning users, in other ways is unfortunate.This should've been corrected along time ago, but what instead happened is one of the most misleading articles being retained and copied as factual. This is a major reason why this site Wikipedia, has next to no credibility. A greater focus is made on politics, versus actual quality content.The article title and content needs to be corrected to DN5 or DN-5. The Continental and original Windstar although related to DN5, are separate platform names of FN9 and WIN88. Both generations of the Continental from 1987-94 and 1994-2002 (FN74), are on the FN9. FN74 was a heavily revised FN9. That's all I'm going to say.Carmaker1 (talk) 22:06, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
Talk:Philippine crocodile

message: After 7 years, this national treasure was released to the wilds to procreate naturally.
--Florentino floro 15:01, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Isabela
Talk:Hindu Time Cycles

message: The article Hindi units of measurements was based upon Vishnu Purana referenced to a web site, there was not a single reliable source in that article. Hence, I merged all contents of that article into the present one, which contains well sourced matter. But matter imported from Hindi units of measurements need to be properly sourced.  The redirection worked only partially for unknown reasons, all other article which were linked to Hindi units of measurements  are automatically linked to Hindu Time Cycles now, but the history of Hindi units of measurements has been lost !  -Vinay Jha Talk14:57, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sourced Content
Talk:Nissan Note

message: Does anyone else gets the sense that this section feels more akin to a dig at Nissan than being information?
51.7.82.163 (talk) 23:27, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nissan Connect related info
Talk:Hyundai Terracan

message: I bought a hunday terracan 05 places and I will want placed him of the benches to the rear so that it becomes again a 07 place. is this possible and how to make? iberal@yahoo.fr —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.201.241.75 (talk) 19:41, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

message: Won't go into 4x 110.32.12.186 (talk) 00:45, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  4x4 won't go into gear
Talk:Ferrari Mythos

message: What the hell is this article? I think it needs completely scrapping and re-writing. It's completely unencyclopedic. 86.8.114.154 (talk) 21:53, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Well it seems the love letter/essay, or whatever, was a recent edit so I've gone back to what it was before. 86.8.114.154 (talk) 21:55, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I reverted it. TornadoLGS (talk) 21:56, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

text: Or someone else did it just as I was about to lol 86.8.114.154 (talk) 21:56, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I have warned the user. If they come back, feel free to report them to WP:AIV. I think it's safe to say that person is not here to build encyclopedia. TornadoLGS (talk) 22:02, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  WTF?
Talk:Nissan Rasheen

message: User Regushee has been adding the RVR as a car which followed the Rasheen. But the RVR went on sale in 1991, three years before the Rasheen. What gives?  ⊂| Mr.choppers |⊃  (talk) 21:08, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Mitsubishi RVR
Talk:CLEVER

message: Is there any information about this car being sold in the United States, or anywhere? I hope this vehicle does not get orphaned like the Carver vehicle.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.152.45.3 (talk) 03:03, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: News of sales?
Talk:Midnight Riders (MLS supporters association)

message: I'm still new at this and can't figure out how to put the Midnight Riders' logo on this page. If you look on their website they have it available.Tsurettejr 15:07, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

message: Hello, 
I don't think that this page should be deleted. This is a real organization, and not the only MLS supporters group on Wikipedia Section 8 Chicago, La Barra Brava, U-Sector, etc. There are detailed references in the intro paragraph. The logo has been added with a fair use description. If there is anything else needed to prevent the deletion of this article please let me know and I will make the appropriate changes. 
-Fran Harrington  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Franharrington (talk • contribs) 01:16, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  speedy deletion? 

message: I made some corrections before logging in. There were both some incorrect information and some incorrect grammar. I updated the membership number, changed leaders to president and got rid of location as there is no location for The Midnight Riders. Franharrington (talk) 07:49, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Corrections

message: How many times are we going to go through this? Franharrington (talk) 22:31, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Again with the notability tag?
Talk:Citroën C-Buggy

message: http://www.diseno-art.com/encyclopedia/concept_cars/citroen_c-buggy.html
I got the sump guard and suspension info from this source.  I don't know how to site.  Do so if possibleG man yo (talk) 04:13, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citing 
Talk:Daihatsu Rugger

message: "The Daihatsu Rugger was an off-road vehicle built by Daihatsu between 1984 and 2002. The Rugger was called the Daihatsu Rocky in most export markets, and Daihatsu Fourtrak in the UK."
Where was it called Rugger then?
79.115.10.203 (talk) 16:50, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Japan, its home market.  ⊂| Mr.choppers |⊃  (talk) 18:28, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rugger? 