lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Short term memory

message: A psychologist should un-stub these articles. Anyone wants to take the job? Finlander 01:31, 8 Jan 2004 (UTC)

message: There is an article short-term memory that may need to be merged with this one.  Christopherlin 21:42, 16 Apr 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, given that the corresponding article is long-term memory (not long term memory), I'm going to do the merge the other way around - I think the hyphenated usage makes more sense, anyway, but that's just opinion, really. - IMSoP 17:48, 20 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplicate?
Talk:Seattle Mariners

message: Can we have a logo history? Thanks 192.235.7.100 (talk) 21:38, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Logo History

message: I removed the "All-Star nominees" section for a few reasons:
*The title implies that the person was nominated for selection to the ASG, which I interpret to mean appeared on the ASG ballot. This has the potential to become an indiscriminate list because every year one player at each position (except pitcher) from each team appears on the ASG ballot.
*Notwithstanding the title, having a list of all of the team's actual All-Stars is also indiscriminate, at least in the context of this article, because of the rule that every team must have at least one All-Star.
*The "Awards" section should consist of special awards that the team or its players don't get every year. —KuyaBriBriTalk 15:16, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Meh. I went ahead and moved the awards section off the main article and onto it's own awards article. That seems to be the most common way of handling the awards section.  --Bobblehead (rants) 18:47, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps WP:INDISCRIMINATE was the wrong policy to cite. WP:UNDUE is more like it. Anyways, what I didn't say above but meant to is that I would support moving this info to a stand-alone list style article, and it looks like that's already been done. —KuyaBriBriTalk 19:53, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  ASG "nominees" section 

message: Maybe somebody should share when Nintendo bought them out?  Wasn't it 1993? 24.113.57.157 (talk) 20:33, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe this will help.  —Brian Halvorsen (talk) 01:27, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nintendo 

message: MOS tag rationale: Various sections in this article that do not comply with WP:MOS. Season records are presented incorrectly and features typos. Culture is outdated as no mention of "Rally fries" appears after 2009 and it is not clear if it still occurs. —Brian Halvorsen (talk) 01:23, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  MOS issues February 2014 

message: How come there isn't a section about the falling roof tiles in 1994? The Mariners were always on the cusp of relocation and the falling tiles in the old Kingdome was almost the last straw. Ken Griffey Jr. and the M's saved baseball in 1995 and without that magical season, they could have been headed to Tampa Bay. The falling tiles was an old and crazy incident that happened with the Mariners at a tenuous time in their existence. Seabums47 (talk) 23:04, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  falling tiles 

message: So far the Mariners have retired 2 numbers and the #42 in honor of Jackie Robinson. Megacheez (talk) 18:57, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seattle Mariners retired numbers template
Talk:Red blood cell

message: Old paragraph: As red blood cells contain no nucleus, protein biosynthesis is currently assumed to be absent in these cells. Because of the lack of nuclei and organelles, mature red blood cells do not contain DNA and cannot synthesize RNA, and consequently cannot divide and have limited repair capabilities.
Request for new edit: Recent research contradicts the prior belief that mature human red blood cells lack DNA and RNA due to nucleus loss during differentiation. Instead, it reveals the presence of various microRNAs and mRNA transcripts in these cells. Analysis of erythrocyte microRNAs found a subgroup of HbSS with severe anemia, linked to elevated miR-144 expression and NRF2 repression. Furthermore, recent evidence suggests substantial amounts of large RNA species, including mRNA and non-coding RNA, exist in mature red blood cells. Kimmy3737 (talk) 21:03, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 17 November 2023 

message: Would like to add new information to the following sentence:
"As red blood cells contain no nucleus, protein biosynthesis is currently assumed to be absent in these cells"
New research from Kumar et. al has identified low levels of protein translation in red blood cells, specifically with regard to alpha and beta globin translation. Further, the researchers have also indicated the presence of polysomes through transmission electron microscopy. I think it could be informative to future readers to be familiar with this information as the current page indicates that RBCs are not capable of protein synthesis, which stands in contradiction to their long lifespans that seem to be unsustainable without protein synthesis. I have drafted a suggested change below:
"Because red blood cells contain no nucleus, protein biosynthesis was previously assumed to be absent in these cells; however, recent studies have revealed low levels of α-globin and β-globin mRNA transcript translation in addition to the presence of polysomes in red blood cells, providing evidence that supports their long life span" (Kumar et. al 2022).
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9635303/#:~:text=Recent%20studies%20have%20reported%20the,mature%20erythrocytes%20perform%20protein%20synthesis. 199.36.244.32 (talk) 03:10, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 16 October 2023 

message: The scientific name for these cells is erythrocytes. They are known as red blood cells, not the other way around. Wikipedia is a scientific source, not a children's coloring book. Lajoswinkler (talk) 19:25, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia is an encyclopedia for the general reader -  scientific info is detailed on pages - entry terms preferably use the generally known terms.--Iztwoz (talk) 11:44, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: That's why we have redirects. Wikipedia is not supposed to promote general ignorance, but keep at it. Lajoswinkler (talk) 19:46, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion to change the title to "erythrocytes" 

message: Non Necleated RBC
@ 2407:D000:503:B96F:5140:CC8E:3D6B:1286 (talk) 12:19, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Physiology
Talk:Reno, Nevada

message: The last two episodes were called Reno, Baby and What Happens in Reno, Stays in Reno. Both protagonists Wade Whipple and Knuckles the Echidna made their main goal reaching Reno. 
I feel that this information would be best suited in the "In popular culture" category.
(see, I would link the paramount episodes themself but I do not have a subscription unfortunately. Instead  I will link the IMDB page for the series. Apologies.)
IMDB page for ep.5 of Knuckles.
IMDB page for ep.6 of Knuckles.
IMDB page for the Knuckles series.
(PS. this is my first time in the talk page! please give me any feedback that you see proper!) Darknanigans (talk) 13:37, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recently the Knuckles TV show on Paramount featured Reno as a location in the last 2 episodes.
Talk:Golden age of Jewish culture in Spain

message: In the first sentence of 'The Birth of the Golden Age' section, it claims that "the Christian Visigoths of Hispania persecuted the Jews severely." This isn't true; the rule of the Visigoths was tolerant. They were Arians (unitarians) and were persecuted by the church for heresy (the Mediaeval Inquisition and Roman Inquisition). When the Arians were wiped out, the Visigoths who had adopted Catholicism were no longer the rulers. Where did this come from? Pydgical (talk) 16:07, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Well there seems to be quite a bit of literature on Visigothic persecutions . Arians were not unitarians, but in any case the Visigoths had become Catholic by the time of the Muslim invasions. I've no idea whether they were more or less tolerant when the were Arian, but it's not really relevant to the point being made. Paul B (talk) 20:17, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Just want to nitpick that Arians are unitarians Stryker Genesis (talk) 21:27, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Visigoths 

message: The formatting on this page is messy and overlapping and needs fixing ASAP. --74.89.110.34 (talk) 04:58, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  formatting 

message: "Having invaded the areas throughout Southern and Northern Spain, and coming to rule in a matter of seven years, Islamic rulers were confronted with many questions relating to the implementation of Islamic Rule on a non-Islamic society."
That sentence does not make any sense at all. All conquests since 622 involved subjugating non-Islamic societies to the Islamic Rule. Did they suddenly wake up in 711 questioning what they've been doing for the past 89 years?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ant9n (talk • contribs) 19:44, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  The nature of the Golden Age 

message: An editor changed "Spain" in the lead to "the Iberian Peninsula". I reverted as the text should not contradict the article title. Another editor reverted back on the ground that "The nation-state of Spain is anachronistic in this article. "Spain" is just used in the title of the article according to WP:UCRN". WP:UCRN says "Wikipedia does not necessarily use the subject's "official" name as an article title; it generally prefers the name that is most commonly used (as determined by its prevalence in a significant majority of independent, reliable English-language sources)" It does not say that the name in the lead and the title can be different, which is confusing for readers. This question has been raised several times in the past (see above) and the decision has always been to keep the current title. A key point is that Iberian Peninsula is just as inaccurate as Spain as the Jewish culture in the Moslem states never extended to northern Iberia. The text must agree with the article title and there is no consensus to change the title. Dudley Miles (talk) 23:46, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spain or Iberia
Talk:Whitehouse.com

message: According to the article, whitehouse.com is "#1 Internet adult site". Where do those statistics come from? Eurleif 08:52, Jan 8, 2004 (UTC)
Any particular reason why the table of contents is on the right in this article? It seems a bit inconsistent with the Wikipedia aesthetic. Also, the current website at WAPAAAAHH.com appears to be a non-government entity that offers government statistical data. Could someone who knows more about this site add a description to the Current Status section? --LostLeviathan 06:57, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This is currently linked to from PC World's 25 worst websites just so you are all aware.Birgitte§β ʈ Talk 16:38, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  PC world article 

message: Two things: Could someone verify that Ransom Scott was the original owner of the site? All the sources I've seen, including the White House letter linked to on the page, site Dan Parisi as the owner (he was also the person who the Clinton administration sent the letter to, not Ransom Scott as the Wiki article suggests.
Second, could anyone cite who is the current owner of the website? I'm not sure if this information is freely available, but it would be nice to include on this page to who/when/for how much Parisi sold the domain name for, if he did in fact sell it. Echnaret (talk) 19:35, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: After doing a Whois search on the site, it appears that Parisi is still the owner of the site, at least as far as billing information is concerned. Echnaret (talk) 19:43, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Owners? 

message: Article states "As of February 2010, the site is now owned by the US government and now redirects to www.whitehouse.gov." Ummmm, no it doesn't. I copy and pasted just to make sure I wasn't copying and the website I got was talking about all sorts of Financial Aid and was definetly NOT whitehouse.gov. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.239.26.184 (talk) 03:35, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current Status 

message: The site is back to porn now. Ganondox (talk) 05:10, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Out of date 

message: This article appears to be mostly such. Thmazing (talk) 18:32, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original research
Talk:Jack Spicer

message: I added the paragraph about Spicer's linguistics background and Martian transmissions off the top of my head. I would like any comments about it. I couldn't think of Hockett's first name since it's been years since I was studying linguistics in grad school.
Matthew Keenan195.229.242.54 10:39, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spicer's "furniture" 

message: Merge it with Xiaolin Showdown 80.44.254.156 (talk) 08:56, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: its not that chara form the cartoon just have the same name --Brainfire2008 (talk) 16:39, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: I just added a new section "Legacy," by splitting up the "Life and work" section. I suggest that after these sections are expanded, that we add a section called "Reception" and then split that section into the subheadings "Critical Reception" and "Legacy." I'm following the precedent set by the Ezra Pound article. It follows this pattern, and the Pound article is considered to be a "starred" article (whether you believe (or not) that Spicer is as influential as Pound).Christian Roess (talk) 19:54, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: New sections needed

message: I am noticing the infobox has code in order to pull the wikidata information, however for whatever reason it isn't pulling most of the information. Does anyone know why? And how do we to fix this? Jooojay (talk) 06:56, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox
Talk:San Francisco Renaissance

message: *http://www.lib.virginia.edu/speccol/exhibits/sixties/beatssf.html
*http://www.citylights.com
These are references for The Beat section. When "Captured April 25, 2005"  was added, the article had this section that included information likely sourced from these two references. The corresponding version of citylights.com has a history page which has been archived here. I'm unable to access a corresponding archive of the virginia.edu ref. --Ronz (talk) 17:43, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Two references for The Beats

message: I've restored the section, updating the citylights.com reference.
I'm unclear on the edit-warring over the section. Can someone please explain? I'm not seeing anyone refer to secondary sources. A history would be ideal to settle such a dispute. --Ronz (talk) 17:49, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: The Beats
Talk:Gil-galad

message: I've completely rewritten this article, with new sources (well, there really weren't any before) and a new structure. There are, in addition to Tolkien and the scholarly sources, adaptations in film and games, not to mention the upcoming Amazon series which to date is only hinted at. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:47, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: If the heraldic image is a scan from one of the Tolkien art books, is that considered fair use under Wikipedia guidelines? I know these images have been scanned all over the Web, but technically the rights have never been released to the public domain. Are the other heraldic devices Tolkien created also used on Wikipedia? Has this been discussed properly elsewhere? Michael Martinez (talk) 15:05, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  Hi Michael, yes, I've written a fair-usage rationale for it, as it's discussed by two scholars in the text. Just saying that something is in McIlwaine or Hammond & Scull would not be sufficient rationale. Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:13, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  Can you provide a link to that? I left a comment on the Middle-earth Heraldry page about this. I decided that's the best place for clarification, rather than on individual articles like this one. Thanks. Michael Martinez (talk) 15:19, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  I see it in the licensing info in the image. I get THAT. But I think the point should still be clarified in the Heraldry page's discussion.Michael Martinez (talk) 15:21, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  Done. Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:38, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Repaint

message: I don't know if it's appropriate to include in this article mention of action figures and such. I know Toy Vault had one (discontinued product - their license was pulled to make room for the Peter Jackson movies). And I've seen at least 1 table top gaming piece. I don't believe the character was used in any card games or role-playing games, per se.Michael Martinez (talk) 15:47, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  I don't see why not, if we're even-handed about notability: it's certainly a claim to fame. I don't think it particularly important on its own, but as part of a bigger picture it's not without encyclopedic interest. Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:53, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: What kind of references do you recommend? I'll see what I can find for links and leave them here. I don't want to edit the article while it's waiting for a GA review.Michael Martinez (talk) 15:58, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  No hurry. A gamer's magazine is probably the best choice as it's indisputably published and independent. Or if you're lucky a newspaper might have some reviews of presents for Christmas, or whatever. Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:04, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Action Figures & Gaming Pieces
Talk:Viasa

message: Dear Writer,
I was intrested reading your page on VIASA I need to correct you that VIASA did have a crash near LISBOA Portugal on 30/5/61 DC-8-52 PH-DCL (Aircraft name)
"Fridjof Nansen" KLM owned in service for VIASA throgh a wet lease. 
Kind regards Willem
* In the article there was no mention of anyone being blamed for the crash. Saying that Viasa was not to blame without any source quoted and whitout any previous POV comment having hinted it was, amounts to a POV comment.
* Stating that rest is mandated by international regulations does address what was being said; "when compared to others" - as all airlines would be subject to the same regulation. Regulations stablished a minimum floor. It is up to each airline and their unions to change it to more if they so negotiate. The new comment did not address the initial comment. --Anagnorisis 17:37, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tito Kayak

message: AFAIK, Tito was an outspoken activist/supporter for the Cause of Vieques, but not a 'leader' of the movement in the sense of holding a notorius position in the organization. IMO, even tho he executed a famous  civil disobedience act (attachment to military tank) and pledged a sign in the Statue of Liberty, he shouldn't be listed as a leader of the movement. Instead, he could be described as an 'outspoken activist'.
- Maio 15:00, 8 Jan 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tito as a leader for the Cause of Vieques? (POV) 

message: Tito Kayak was not born in Vieques. You should fix that mistake. I wil give you exact municipality in two days since today, January 29 2007. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.50.227.3 (talk) 03:15, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tito is not from Vieques 

message: It may be true (or not) that there is a "controversy" surrounding Tito Kayak and those who back his actions -- a "controversy" which itself would be worth looking-into as a possible U.S. imperialist PSYOPS. But besides that, this article itself has clearly been altered in a way typical of the work of busy individuals who likely support the U.S. Rightwing -- and its military -- in Puerto Rico and elsewhere. This addendum is very much not NPOV, and should be altered to only reflect that there is a "controversy" (assuming), and who is involved in it (or not). For that matter, I for one do not believe a word of this claim; nor that somehow Tito Kayak has now been magically "discredited" by it in any way.
As it stands, this addendum to the Tito Kayak article is just a low-level libel and a hatchet-job by one Rightwinger here on Wikipedia -- and absolutely does not stand as an acceptable addition to this encyclopedia entry. Someone please change it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pazouzou (talk • contribs) 21:11, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  '''Pro-Imperialist Bias in Article''' 

message: The last paragrah was edited.  This is not true and is not neutral position.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Amigosdelmar (talk • contribs) 21:09, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Information edited==
Talk:Numerical methods for ordinary differential equations

message: According to the St Andrews' MacTutor website, specifically http://www-history.mcs.st-and.ac.uk/history/Mathematicians/Runge.html and http://www-history.mcs.st-and.ac.uk/history/Mathematicians/Kutta.html, the names are as written by 142.177.19.200 (Carle David Tolmé Runge and Martin Wilhelm Kutta), and not as I wrote them earlier. Jitse Niesen 15:20, 8 January 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Names

message: I removed the following item from the History section:
:1968 - C. William Gear invents the first stable algorithms to solve stiff differential equations.
I suppose this refers to BDF (backward differentiation formula), which were in fact already introduced by Curtiss and Hirschfelder in the same 1952 paper where they talk about stiffness. Please correct me if I am wrong. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 16:58, 5 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Gear

message: There is no such thing as a numerical equation -- ODE or otherwise.  This page should be named Numerical solutions to... or Numerical methods of... -- no? jheiv talk contribs 21:44, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page title 

message: Greetings, I'm sorry but I don't quite know LaTeX well enough to put a space between the \forall  and  i=1,2,3,...,N-1  if you do know please do correct me.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fuse809 (talk • contribs) 15:28, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Solution to second order bvps
Talk:Roman candle (firework)

message: Diagram of construction
:Added a diagram --Petteri Aimonen (talk) 21:20, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Diagram request

message: Shouldn't this article redirect to Roman candle and be re-written to be singular? That is wiki-convention, is it not? —Frecklefoot 16:50, 8 Jan 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Why plural?

message: Personally, I believe the second picture should be removed.  First, it does not show any benefit more than the first picture.  Also, the person in the picture is using unsafe practices, including holding a firework in his hand that is almost always labeled "Do Not Hold In Hand," as well as wearing unsafe clothing for using fireworks.  71.0.221.41 (talk) 19:24, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Second picture

message: having just dismantled a roman candle myself a day ago, the construction of mine was very different to what's pictured. The stars are balls, not flat discs. There is only 1 cardboard stopper in the tube at the beginning, to keep the contents inside. There is no cardboard between the stars. Between each star is an amount of smokeless powder, and an equal amount of a gold coloured material for making the shower of sparks between stars firing, and repeat. Presumably the smokeless powder confined inside of the cardboard tube is the mechanism for launch the stars with the particular brand. I'm sorry that I'm unable to recall the brand.
I'm not mecessarily saying the diagram in the construction section is incorrect. Just that the section seems incomplete in that it lacks any other designs. I understand it's not practical to include descriptions of every conceivable design. But, I think at least a couple of other types. 2607:FEA8:99E0:61D0:7882:67FA:4A4F:65F6 (talk) 03:41, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Construction image wrong or multiple types exist