Talk:Haakon, Crown Prince of Norway

message: Move. Eugène van der Pijll 16:31, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: *Support As nominator. Charles 22:29, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: This usage is having the article Elizabeth II Alexandra Mary of the United Kingdom, etc. Haakon Magnus is not in official use, nor is it more commonly used. Charles 22:29, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: Just to clarify my insertion of 's between the two Line of succession-boxen at the foot of misc 'royal' articles, this one included: the intent was/is to insert a little 'breathing' space (an empty line) between the boxen, to prevent them from directly touching each other. Purely an aesthetic measure, I admit, but how about discussing it before summarily removing them?
I presume the trouble might pertain to different rendering among different skins (?), but in that case, feel free to describe the effects. I am interested in hearing about them, as I too would like to do my edits knowing that they won't result in bad layout effects in other skins than the one I am currently using. I would hope the Wikipedia code didn't allow such things to happen, though (?). --Wernher 03:30, 5 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: To <nowiki><br></nowiki> or not to <nowiki><br></nowiki>

message: When (if) he succeeds to the Throne, it could be as (most likely) Haakon VIII, or maybe Magnus VII or even (though less likely), Haakon-Magnus I. Mightberight/wrong] 21:05, 28 October 2005.
: I have a hazy memory that in some royal house or other (I'm thinking Italy or one of its predecessors) the monarchs typically had two names and a number for each, so he could be Haakon VIII Magnus VII.  —Tamfang 06:24, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: When he succeeds, we'll have to move the article anyway. Let's leave this till then. Septentrionalis 17:44, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: So it is OK for this dictionary to contain errors? What a stupid concept. Dubidub 13:19, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: He may choose that name

message: I suggest renaming the page "Haakon, Crown Prince of Norway".  Haakon Magnus is his full baptismal name, but that is not the name he uses.  This change will require an administrator (I think) since the page already exists as a redirect. Noel S McFerran 19:07, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article title

message: Why is this page named "Haakon Magnus, Crown Prince of Norway", when his correct name is "Crown Prince Haakon", not including Magnus? For a reference, see the official royal website at http://www.kongehuset.no/default.asp?lang=eng (click on The Royal family ->  Today´s Royal Family -> HRH The Crown Prince).Dubidub 17:01, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page name 

message: The comments that I just added have a line through them. I don't know how to revert this. It is not customary on English Wikipedia to strike out discussions, regardless of whether the editor considers the matter dealt with. Could the person who did this please remove all the lines? 
Amandajm (talk) 15:46, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I found the problem. Amandajm (talk) 15:51, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help! 

message: It's very cordial of the prince to provide a link to his sister's page on his Wikipedia presence.
68.84.25.148 (talk) 13:17, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proper Introduction 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Haakon, Crown Prince of Norway. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add  after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
*Attempted to fix sourcing for https://www.regjeringen.no/nb/aktuelt/hans-kongelige-hoyhet-kronprinsen-utnevn/id745632/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:23, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Haakon, Crown Prince of Norway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130317090625/http://www.noblesseetroyautes.com/nr01/2012/10/diner-en-lhonneur-du-president-de-finlande-au-palais-royal-doslo/ to http://www.noblesseetroyautes.com/nr01/2012/10/diner-en-lhonneur-du-president-de-finlande-au-palais-royal-doslo/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130317091441/http://www.noblesseetroyautes.com/nr01/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/puku1_1010JID_vi.jpg to http://www.noblesseetroyautes.com/nr01/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/puku1_1010JID_vi.jpg
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:04, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Should we mention that he's currently regent? or is this a common thing, in the last few months. GoodDay (talk) 01:11, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regency 

message: On 26 August 2022‎, JayBeeEll made a revert to my edit, stating, "sources fail to verify; but also this labeling is unambiguous BLP-violation". JayBeeEll seems to believe that when I did "describe an individual as 'controversial'" regarding Haakon's wife Mette-Marit Tjessem Høiby there was a violation of the Biographies of living persons policy (not clear what relevant section) and that the "sources fail to verify". This even though I had verified the information and included two inline citations that in my opinion supports the characterization as "controversial". Business Insider stated, "These days, the Crown Princess is far less controversial". It is evident that is the same as stating that she was controversial. The Guardian used a word or two that may be harsher than writing "controversial". 
Today I found more references that seem to corroborate that Princess Mette-Marit Tjessem Høiby was controversial at the time of her marriage with Prince Haakon.. 
According to the guideline MOS:LABEL, "Rather than describing an individual using the subjective and vague term controversial, instead give readers information about relevant controversies." The controversies in the process of the marriage of Haakon seem to be notable and are in the body of the article. Maybe they are notable enough to be included in the lead of the current Haakon page.
# Should the controversies of Haakon's wife be mentioned in the lead? 
## If yes, is the text in the lead "He married a controversial[4][5] regular citizen, Mette-Marit Tjessem Høiby" ok, if it is in reference to further context in the body of the article?
## If yes but in another words, what words?
Thinker78 (talk) 19:07, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Per WP:BLPSTYLE:   --JBL (talk) 17:56, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, but should the controversies of Haakon's wife be mentioned in the lead? Thinker78 (talk) 17:33, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: If you want to make a concrete proposal of some language to add, I would be happy to weigh in on whether I think it is appropriate.  In doing so, I will be keeping in mind WP:BLP, WP:DUE, and the fact that this is a biography of Haakon, not of his wife. JBL (talk) 18:32, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I understand that this is a biographical article about Haakon, not his wife. But his marriage proved to be controversial for a time. The question then beofore any proposal is if such controversy belongs in the lead or not, because it is a controversy that seems to relate integrally to the life of Haakon and his role in his country. Thinker78 (talk) 19:12, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: If you want to make a concrete proposal of some language to add, I would be happy to weigh in on whether I think it is appropriate. JBL (talk) 00:49, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Should the controversies of Haakon's wife be mentioned in the lead?

message: The redirect Crown Prince of Norway has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Estar8806 (talk) 21:01, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Crown Prince of Norway]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect Haakon VIII has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Estar8806 (talk) 15:43, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Haakon VIII]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:07, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion