Talk:Tlatelolco massacre

message: The photo of the Mexican Foreign Ministry is wrong: it shows the new site of the Foreign Ministry in Avenida Juarez, opposite Parque Alameda, a good two kilometres distant from the old site overlooking the Plaza de las Tres Culturas. I have been a resident of Mexico City for over 6 years.Ocoineagain (talk) 08:05, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The photo of the Mexican Foreign Ministry is wrong 

message: I still stand with my position that this page should be merged with the article of Mexico 68. Hell, even this article has more data of the movement itself than the other one.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.103.235.33 (talk) 02:08, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I vote against merger. The massacre was a significant event in its own right. The student movement of 68 in Mex City was context, but not the same event. Both deserve separate articles. jackbrown (talk) 20:59, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

text: Oppose. The movements occurred throughout most of the summer and in other months too. The massacre should have a separate article. ComputerJA (☎ • ✎) 21:57, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  This article has much more information than the one on Mexico 68 (which no one calls it that, BTW). The Spanish version redirects to this article (the Massacre). I agree that the Massacre is another event, but it's extremely linked to the movement and posting it as its separate article could make it lack context. I propose that the Massacre be a subsection in an article (or merge the contents in the Mexico 68 article with this one. 187.234.173.46 (talk) 06:32, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging 

message: El Universal just published an article claiming that the CIA hid several valuable documents regarding this event. It's very complete, and it has several videos of experts and analysts regarding this massacre. Please it out if you want, I highly recommend it. ComputerJA (talk) 18:05, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good article for expansion 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Tlatelolco massacre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081005045741/http://www.jornada.unam.mx:80/ultimas/2008/10/02/se-preven-4-marchas-en-el-df-para-conmemorar-la-matanza-del-68 to http://www.jornada.unam.mx/ultimas/2008/10/02/se-preven-4-marchas-en-el-df-para-conmemorar-la-matanza-del-68
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:47, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: There seems to be a lot of references to "government documents made public since 2000"
"But government documents made public since 2000 suggest that the snipers had been employed by the government. Estimates of the death toll ranged from 30 to 300, with eyewitnesses reporting hundreds dead"[2][3][4][5][6][7] 
From a cusory glance, i cant find any direct refrences to these documents and researching the subject i found this article, http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB99/, from 2003 which states:
"Finally, not one document declassified by the U.S. government discusses at any length evidence that government agents operating as snipers from the windows of the Tlatelolco apartment complex may have initiated the massacre of October 2. The Defense Intelligence Agency in particular - which had defense attachés gathering intelligence on the Mexican military at the time - should have produced internal cables, memoranda and analyses discussing the presence of government snipers."
Can anyone find these documents that state the snipers were agents of the mexican govenment?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.71.15.178 (talk) 00:05, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Documentation of Goverment Snipers 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Tlatelolco massacre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20091004070235/http://www.dissentmagazine.org/article/?article=582 to http://www.dissentmagazine.org/article/?article=582
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:34, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Tlatelolco massacre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110613113036/http://houston.indymedia.org/news/2008/10/65207.php to http://houston.indymedia.org/news/2008/10/65207.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:02, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: :The Mexican government invested a massive $150 million in preparation for the 1968 Olympics to be hosted in Mexico City. That amount was equal to roughly $1 billion by today's terms.
::citation: Henry Giniger. "Hundreds Seized in Mexico Clashes," New York Times. September 23, 1968.
Whatever the New York Times may have written in 1968, there is no citation for the claim that $150 million is equivalent to $1 billion (whenever "today" may have been--hardly in 1968!).
Please add proper sourcing, else I will delete at least the second sentence. Please also check the 1968 NYT article, else I will mark it as a doubtful source given the context of improper sourcing--if nobody knows what was written in it, how can we assume that it covers the first sentence? ... Thanks, Ibn Battuta (talk) 13:36, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: As nobody has offered a reference or other corroborating evidence, I've now deleted both sentences on the article page. Of course feel free to restore them if you have a reference and/or can add information regarding the second sentence. --Ibn Battuta (talk) 21:42, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation missing / wrong citation 

message: I have not read anywhere else that the students were protesting the Olympics. I believe they were protesting a single party government that was targeting University students as reactionaries. Please correct me. 47.149.106.241 (talk) 03:16, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not protesting the summer Olympics, right?