Talk:Juliet

message: Juliet and Romeo were not just a story characters. They were aslo real human beings.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.137.105.82 (talk) 09:51, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  More Performers, Please! 

message: She uses monosyllabic words with Romeo, and formal language with Paris. -Malkinann 01:48, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Juliet's language

message: I recently removed the statement that Juliet is "betrayed" by her nurse, changing it instead to "let down". It's true that the nurse's suggestion that Juliet should marry Paris, when she knows that Juliet is secretly married to Romeo, is pretty outrageous; and not only Juliet but also probably the audience and the readers feel disillusioned and let down. But "betrayal" would suggest that the nurse actually pretends to support Juliet, while treacherously reporting to others the secrets with which she has been entrusted. There's no suggestion that the nurse does that. Admittedly, she very likely keeps silent because she doesn't want to get into trouble for the role she played in assisting the lovers, rather than out of any loyalty to Juliet. But I think "betrayed" is still too strong a word to use, and I see that it has been put back. Cowardly Lion (talk) 17:29, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nurse's "betrayal"? 

message: In Shakespears time when it says that girls where normally at the age of 21 before they made children, they were mainly forced at a young age to get married (even 11).
I wasn't able to change it so I decided to say it in the discussion.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.135.25.158 (talk) 13:06, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Shakespears time 

message: Can someone revert the October 2, 2010 change to the introduction?--24.190.144.211 (talk) 19:21, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Jungli" 

message: In Juliet's 'Physical Appearance' section, someone keeps changing the age to 15.  She is fifteen in one of the poem versions, but she is thirteen in Shakespeare's play. (Capulet says : 'She hath not seen the change of fourteen years...'
Or, maybe someone should get rid of the 'Physical Appearance section altogether?  It 'is' only one sentence.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.166.173.83 (talk) 22:14, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: What is the purpose of saying that "the parts of young women were played by pre-adolescent boys in Shakespeare's day also cannot be overlooked and it is possible that Shakespeare had the physique of a young boy in mind during composition"? This has nothing to do with the age of the character, and the following word "in addition to the fact that Romeo and Juliet are of wealthy families and would be more likely to marry earlier than commoners" is entirely unconnected.Royalcourtier (talk) 19:37, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age 

message: The lead reads:
:"The story has a long history that precedes Shakespeare himself. The heroine's wealthy and rich family lived in Verona, headed by Capulet and his wife. She was their youngest child. She apparently had older siblings at some point, but by the time of the play, she was their only surviving child."
Makes it sound like the play is Juliet's biography. Care for change? Ratibgreat (talk) 13:22, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Possibly. Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty | Averted crashes 18:02, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  In universe? 

message: I have noticed a somewhat strange, or dubious at best, statement on the section Juliet's Age. It says: " In many cultures and time periods, women did and do marry and bear children at such a young age."
At the Wikipedia page " Marriageable age" it says quite the oposite, at it's secion "History and social attitudes": "Traditionally, across the world, the age of consent for a sexual union was a matter for the family to decide, or a tribal custom. In most cases, this coincided with signs of puberty, menstruation for a woman and pubic hair for a man.[1]
In Ancient Rome, it was very common for girls to marry and have children shortly after the onset of puberty.
The first recorded age-of-consent law dates back 800 years: In 1275, in England, as part of the rape law, a statute, Westminster 1, made it a misdemeanor to "ravish" a "maiden within age," whether with or without her consent. The phrase "within age" was interpreted by jurist Sir Edward Coke as meaning the age of marriage, which at the time was 12 years of age.[2]
In the 12th century Gratian, the influential founder of Canon law in medieval Europe, accepted age of puberty for marriage to be between 12 and 14 but acknowledged consent to be meaningful if the children were older than 7. There were authorities that said that consent could take place earlier. Marriage would then be valid as long as neither of the two parties annulled the marital agreement before reaching puberty, or if they had already consummated the marriage. It should be noted that Judges honored marriages based on mutual consent at ages younger than 7, in spite of what Gratian had said; there are recorded marriages of 2 and 3 year olds.[1]
The American colonies followed the English tradition, and the law was more of a guide. For example, Mary Hathaway (Virginia, 1689) was only 9 when she was married to William Williams. Sir Edward Coke (England, 17th century) made it clear that "the marriage of girls under 12 was normal, and the age at which a girl who was a wife was eligible for a dower from her husband's estate was 9 even though her husband be only four years old."[1]"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marriageable_age
Pretending the custom in our days is the general rule all over the History and all over the world could be understood as revisionism...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mariznobrega (talk • contribs) 00:31, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Julie'ts age and marriageable age. Revisionism? 

message: The statement that "Juliet is a headstrong and intelligent character in spite of her young age" is wrong. Intelligence and being headstrong have nothing to do with age.119.224.100.246 (talk) 03:36, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Headstrong and intelligent nothing to do with age 

message: Not only is the claim that the house pictured in Verona is the Capulet house (if there ever was one, they are after all fictional characters!), very dubious, but the balcony itself is apparently a recent addition (possibly a period sarcophagus, added during restorations for the 1936 movie, though that factoid comes from a web site for which I cannot claim any authority). Most importantly though, although act2 scene2 of Romeo and Juliet is universally known as 'the balcony scene' there is no mention of a balcony. It clearly states that Juliet appears 'at a window'. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romeo_and_Juliet#The_Balcony_Scene . Surly this is worth clarifying in the article, more than simply saying the house is 'claiming' to be the capulets. The casa de Giulietta in Verona is basically a tourist scam. Very successful and long running, apparently getting more visits than David (the statue), but a scam all the same.Adagio67 (talk) 07:40, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fake balcony on a probably fake house 

message: i really don't think that juliet's name was "originally" ivliet. in the style of typography used, a capital j in the title's font appears to be a capital i. if you look further in the cited text, the name john is rendered as iohn. same with the letters u and v. so i'm taking it out 192.76.7.137 (talk) 10:48, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  ivliet 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Juliet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131026010854/http://oregonstate.edu/instruct/phl302/texts/more/utopia-slaves.html to http://oregonstate.edu/instruct/phl302/texts/more/utopia-slaves.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100605160133/http://www.julietclub.com/index_en.asp to http://www.julietclub.com/index_en.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:10, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Most of the family relations listed, especially the cousins, are taken from After Juliet rather than the original play. I think these should be removed, since there are non-canonical. Is there anyone here who agrees with me? (Kaiserincapulet (talk) 21:23, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The article in general has major problems with fancruft and original research, so there's quite a lot of cleanup required. But to your specific point, yes, anything that is sourced to After Juliet should probably be removed outright, unless it can fairly easily be re-sourced to something scholarly (books, journal articles, etc.) that deal with the Shakespeare play. The Macdonald play merits at most a paragraph somewhere towards the end of the article. --Xover (talk) 07:25, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Juliet's Family 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Juliet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://archive.is/20120907215338/http://www.premioterna.it/en/new/juliet%E2%80%99s--graffiti-at-the--d-orsay-museum-in-paris to http://www.premioterna.it/en/new/juliet%E2%80%99s--graffiti-at-the--d-orsay-museum-in-paris
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:21, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Lots of words on Juliet’s age; but Romeo’s age (in Shakespeare) is not cited... Not at Romeo either. MBG02 (talk) 13:02, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age. Romeo.