lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Round table groups

message: The source page linked to was posted March 18th, 2004 - the article history indicates this page was present on Wikipedia before that date, and was substantially the same, suggesting that the original source was really Wikipedia.  I don't think it is a high quality article, but nor do I think that this is evidence of any copyright violation. Crosbiesmith 22:03, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Admissible rule

message: I replaced Admissible inference rule with a redirect to this page. I believe that the other article was incorrect: Admissibility is not about composing existing inference rules, but about facts that arise because those inference rules are the only ones in the system. For instance, one cannot generally construct the cut rule by composing other rules (then it would be derivable); rather, one must actually perform a computation on the derivations of the premises in order to form a derivation of the conclusion.
A while ago I wrote some information on admissibility in the article on inference rules. I think the material rightly belongs in that article, but surely the article "Admissible rule" shouldn't be a stub that's shorter than the discussion in some larger article. Thoughts? Brighterorange 22:04, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Gentzen proved in 1934 the cut-elimination theorem for his sequent calculus. He did not isolate admissibility as a general concept, which entered the proof theory jargon only much later. There is no need or reason to refer to admissible rules in the statement of Gentzen's theorem. — EJ (talk) 12:52, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Clarke Road Secondary School

message: A note to whoever keeps vandalzing this page and saying that the school has the HIGHEST test scores, IT DOESN'T. PLEASE STOP VANDALZING THE PAGE. the school has LOWEST test scores, it can be PROVEN.
::(Comment left unsigned by anonymous IP 64.231.101.182, HSE-Toronto-ppp312817.sympatico.ca.)
* Reponse. It was I who reverted your changes.  I presumed that you were vandalizing for two reasons: (1) you are making derogatory claims without citing an external reference, and (2) you are making edits anonymously without logging in.  If you would, please consider creating an account and provide an externally verfiable source of information which states that this school has the "LOWEST test scores" if such can be proven.  --GRider\talk 22:36, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  STOP the vandalism. 

message: This article is very poorly written.  For instance, I fail to see what "the girls are seen as sluts" has to do with the school, aside from the fact that it's not verifiable.  --Myles Long 22:38, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poorly written 

message: Regarding the "girls are sluts" thing, if you lived here you'd know the extensive amount of tesging and jokes made about the school, that's what teh school is known for, but I never WROTE IT WAS TRUE, quite the contrary, in fact. I could have written a paragraph about the school's reputation, but I ddin't I only gave it a mention. Also, the proof of the EQAO results are here: www.tvdsb.on.ca/links/publications/june2004.pdf  and here:  www.eqao.com/pdf_e/05/05P015e.pdf   THOSE RE REPORTS FORM THE SCHOOL BOARD.
* So the test scores are verifiable.  "Reputation" is far from verifiable, though, so it doesn't warrant mention, imo.  --Myles Long 22:49, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Response
Talk:Miller Puckette

message: IANAL, but I strongly disagree that this article is a copyright violation.  The man's (self-reported) credentials are facts, which cannot be copyrighted.  The person who created the article seems to have intentionally changed the phrasing, to avoid using the same presentation of the facts.  Then, as would be expected, new material was added.  I imagine User:ErikNY was very proud of himself for finding the similarity to Puckette's "biographical note" (which was linked from the article, hence easy to find!), but wiping the article is, in my opinion, ridiculous and unwarranted. -Rjyanco 22:14, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd suspect he'd copyleft the material (if it isn't already), but short articles are easy enough, so rewritten, now. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 04:08, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio

message: (I'm Miller Puckette - as I understand it, it's allowable to comment on articles for which one has a COI.)  The line about CRCA is outdated - CRCA was disestablished in 2012.  I'm retired now.  Also, I didn't write the piece Pluton - that is by Philippe Manoury.  If anyone wants to update this article you're welcome to add a bit of good news: I've won the 2023 Silver Lion award of the Biennale Musica. 86.74.164.60 (talk) 08:22, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  some factual errors
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television/Buffyverse task force

message: A discussion is taking place as to whether :Portal:Buffy the Vampire Slayer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The page will be discussed at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Buffy the Vampire Slayer (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the page during the discussion, including to improve the page to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the deletion notice from the top of the page. North America1000 10:08, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomination of [[:Portal:Buffy the Vampire Slayer]] for deletion 

message: Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for information on WP1.0 web tool 

message: I think this project should be marked as inactive. Any objections? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:07, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marking as inactive 

message: I invite editors to join the discussion at WP:WikiProject Television to convert many inactive WikiProjects into taskforces, including this one. – sgeureka t•c 12:54, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Turn this WikiProject into a Taskforce? 

message: I invite editors to join the discussion at WP:WikiProject Television to close inactive task forces, including this one. Gonnym (talk) 12:08, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Closing inactive task forces
Talk:Tage Erlander

message: Personally I feel that it's more important to format it like the successors biografypages are presented. An image would also be suiting. I'll see what I can do, if I can remember :P Dead-Inside 14:33, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: W.L. Mackenzie King was prime minister of the Dominion of Canada for 32 consecutive years. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.65.159.153 (talk) 22:19, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Erlander had the longest uninterrupted tenure. King was PM for three different periods, not consecutively as you proclaim. Shoplifter (talk) 19:52, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Even combining the different periods, William Lyon Mackenzie King was prime minister for only 22 years, shorter than Erlander's tenure. --Roentgenium111 (talk) 19:17, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Longest serving head of government in a democratic country? 

message: The quality of this piece is very poor. Whilst it is appropriate to question idealized accounts, to imply that Erlander (or Moeller) was a 'Himmler light' is a travesty. Perhaps a few lines could be used to account for his achievement of eliminating poverty and social insecurity in Sweden...and consolidate democracy?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.63.255.186 (talk) 06:39, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Quality
Talk:Bliss Knapp

message: "Knapp's father, Ira, was the first person to serve as chairman of the Christian Science Board of Directors, though he was also forced under oath in court to admit Eddy had never taught this herself."
To what does this refer? That he was to be chairman, or that Eddy was a fulfillment of prophecy from Revelations?
--babbage 22:19, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In the spirit of Wikipidia as being unbiased, I rewrote the article to reflect historical facts left out previously. That Knapp was a friend of Eddy that she fostered is not open to dispute. Nor can anyone impune his devotion to Eddy. But how far "off" did he go? Was his opinion only his or did others hold the same notions?  If you look beneath the pages of this controversy, you'll see that the anti-Knapp view is not the only opinion there is of this devoted individual.  A revised biography will be coming out on Knapp, originally published by Dr. Ted Houpt, former professor of Principia College. I'll footnote when its available. I'm neither pro nor con Knapp - just want to get out BOTH sides of the story. SimonATL 10:22, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article was rewritten to be less biased against Knapp

message: Rogers stated, "a statement by the Churches's Board of Directors in 1943 (later withdrawn)" What is the basis for this statment?  Where in any pubs of the CS Publishing Society can this be shown? Thanks SimonATL 13:50, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Basis for statement that "Mrs. Eddy's Place Article Withdrawn
Talk:Big Five personality traits

message: I think this article is very well done so far, but I did notice that the lead paragraph could maybe use some revising. I noticed that in the description of the big 5 personality traits, they used the word personality trait in the definition. This is a bit confusing for readers who are looking for a true definition. I also think it would be helpful if the lead paragraph contained a summary of the different topics that will be discussed in the content of the article so readers know what to expect. Abby fisher (talk) 23:00, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I gave an edit to the first sentence of the lead paragraph clarifying the definition of the Big five trying to maintain the meaning of what was previously stated. I do think there is still something missing from my small edit, I just can't think of it. GardenVarietyChef (talk) 00:40, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

text: I took out the word taxonomy in the lead-in since it was accompanied by grouping anyway, which should be sufficient. later in the article when the word is used it is used appropriately. GardenVarietyChef (talk) 00:44, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead Paragraph 

message: This article shows the importance of each personality. However, more description could be used. For example, the article describes each of the personalities, how these personalities work. The visual of each of these personalities should correlate an image being made for each one to gain a description of how the personalities can be made out with us. This can be used by having a real life, or experience that describes each of the personalities listed in the Big Five Personalities.  66.219.222.22 (talk) 04:55, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  More description or images? 

message: Last full paragraph in this section has no real source. Can we find a source for this last sentence?  Gracepel (talk) 02:18, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neuroticism  

message: critical/rational as the opposite of friendly/compassionate is certainly wrong, telling, and unsupported. I suggest replacing rational with judgmental which is what's in Agreeableness. Lycurgus (talk) 07:00, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: ty Lycurgus (talk) 14:35, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Highly Objectionable and Unsupported reversal of Agreeableness 

message: — Assignment last updated by Luca Vieten (talk) 22:00, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Comparative Management Seminar
Talk:Sexual addiction

message: This seems like an absurd title for a redirect to this article.  Does anyone know if this refers to something in particular? If not, I'm going to WP:RfD it. Seppi333 (Insert 2¢) 10:43, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: It is indeed a very silly redirect; it was a single link from the article Nurse 3D, which I have now removed from the article. Yes, please RfD it. -- The Anome (talk) 10:56, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Listed at WP:RfD#Addicted to men. Seppi333 (Insert 2¢) 11:13, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Addicted to men]] 

message: Hello, the sub-section referring to ICD in the part talking about "classification" is confusing as it refers to both ICD-10 and ICD-11 as "The most recent version of that document". These statements can not both be true can they? It may be worth clarifying what is meant here.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pwatts2 (talk • contribs) 17:34, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Changed. Tgeorgescu (talk) 20:05, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion in the Section on ICD 

message: Can we include dr Hilton here Jm33746 (talk) 15:53, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: AFAIK he is a neurosurgeon. His area of expertise does not include sexual "addiction". You are gently reminded to obey WP:MEDRS. tgeorgescu (talk)  17:12, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

text: And Hilton is an anti-pornography activist, i.e. he wants to ban all pornography, even when consumed with moderation. tgeorgescu (talk)  07:57, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dr. Donald Hilton
Talk:Newbury (UK Parliament constituency)

message: If needed, I have a scan of the flyer the Conservatives posted just before the elction regarding the Newbury cinema. 84.64.141.210 20:52, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cinema

message: That bit about fox-hunting is rubbish and should be taken out. The Tories won because they won over more people on council estates in the constituency, where the average voter is largely unconcerned with hunting. I was there throughout the early part of 2005 and have studied the constituency in depth and the change in support is too large to be accounted for solely by hunting. It is a cop-out on Rendel's behalf because the most significant factor in Rendel's defeat was the fact that he had neglected the constituency for years and national issues played a large part in getting out the vote on the day. Lstanley1979 (talk) 12:27, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fox-hunting and so on
Talk:Serotonergic psychedelics

message: Should this perhaps be titled "Serotonergic Hallucinogens?"
:Actually, I think the proper article title should be "Classic psychedelic" (article titles should not be pluralized).  If we stick with serotonergic, we definitely do not want to use the term hallucinogen.  Of note, please see the article psychoactive drug.  I am surprised you did not notice that article when linking to the psychedelic article.  --Thoric 00:11, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Category talk:Australian musicians

message: Kylie Minogue as a subcategory?
:would probably be better as a subcategory of :category:Australian pop singers.  i'll move it. clarkk 10:12, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: unsigned earlier message

message: :Category:Australian musical groups doesn't need to be a subcat of this, does it? They are both immediate children of :Category:Australian music. pfctdayelise 03:24, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Category hierarchy
Talk:Marriage à la mode (play)

message: Can anyone figure out which "Sutherland" is quoted here and wikify him? LizardWizard 23:47, Apr 25, 2005 (UTC)
From an Amazon search, James Sutherland appears to be the most obvious candidate, but not clear from which of his publications this might come, and he doesn't seem to have a Wikipedia article. DionysosProteus 13:00, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, 'tis he.  I've added a proper reference, --Antiquary (talk) 18:24, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Citation question

message: Someone recently changed the spelling of the article title to "Marriage à la mode" from the original "Marriage A-la-Mode." However, the hyphenated and capitalized title seems to be standard in most editions. The contributor claims Dryden spelled it à la mode but provides no reference -- I suggest it should be changed back.--174.56.0.212 (talk) 21:32, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Between the title and two textual occurrences, I see three different "spellings" (well, punctuations, really) of the title.  While it is likely that it was inconsistently presented in its day, surely one can be used throughout in this article?  Which one, I'm not sure, though.  I prefer Marriage à la Mode, but that is not based on any scholarship or references. Huw Powell (talk) 15:14, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling 

message: Is it ever performed in the modern-day? 173.88.246.138 (talk) 03:56, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modern-day productions
Talk:Human/Archive 11

message: i'd like to propose that the intro would benefit from a brief sentence linking some of the heights of human activity.  i think this because there are (at least) three aspects to humanity -- what we're made of (biology), what we think of ourselves (self-reflection), and what we do.  and maybe it's my humanism leaking through, but i think humans are capable of doing some cool things that we'd do well to note in the intro.  my draft sentence is this: 
:As a result of the capacities for language, abstract reasoning, and self-reflection, humans have the ability to engage in a number of activities, including science, philosophy, religion, art, medicine, and law.
by no means do i intend this as a final edit.  I just thought it was a start.  any thoughts?  Ungtss 15:15, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  heights of human activity
Talk:Minister of Militia and Defence

message: Ideally a description and history of the Ministry of Militia and Defence should be here, whereas the actual names of past ministers should be on its own  "List of Canadian Ministers of Militia and Defence" page.Trapper 07:58, Apr 27, 2005 (UTC)
:I don't think that's necessary, really, as the main article can contain the list. violet/riga (t) 10:35, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
Category talk:South Gloucestershire District

message: South Gloucestershire clearly represents a separate entity from Gloucestershire as far as I'm concerned. There should definitely be a separate category for all things South Glos, as to have them under the incorrect heading of 'Gloucestershire' would be non-factual and misleading. At least I think so anyway.. ;_) Vanky 17:42, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  My tuppance
Talk:Serotonergic

message: The only article that linked here in the past was Paroxetine, this has been fixed, and commented on in the Talk:Paroxetine page.  --Overand 00:10, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "Pertaining to or affecting serotonin" sounds like a dictionary definition per WP:NOTDICTIONARY.
This article needs a major rewrite.
Pinging article creator and active editors:
, , , , , ,  — CrafterNova [ TALK ] [ CONT ] 12:26, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: This page should rightfully be optimized as either a set index article or merely a disambiguation page. The latter is probably enough, as DABs usually contain a link to Wiktionary for the dictdef (for any users who desire it). Quercus solaris (talk) 21:06, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'll be WP:bold and make it a DAB. If anyone is scandalized by that change, feel free to revert it (kindly, without prejudice). Quercus solaris (talk) 21:12, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dictionary definition
Talk:Screwed the Pooch

message: shouldn't an error be noted about the poker game? Peter says they are playing texas holdem yet when ted turner and carter pewterschmidt are head to head they both show 5 cards, which obviously doesn't happen in texas holdem Hjdods 10:50, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poker game 

message: I just watched that scene, where Peter and Carter are smoking cigars at the race. If the cigar glow is a reference to the no-smoking sign, that has got to be the most obscure reference I've ever seen. It doesn't even look like the no-smoking sign, it's just a red glow and 2 dots. I'm removing it from the cultural references section. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sc4Freak (talk • contribs) 11:55, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cigar reference 

message: Is the "Price is Right" note really necessary? The producers would have done some research on it, so I don't really see why it should be on the page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.5.200.68 (talk) 22:28, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't follow you. Are you saying he does not trip into the set of The Price is Right after all? I'm not from the US myself, so I'm not familiar with the show. --GSchjetne (talk) 02:15, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not certain I understand either, but 2007-10-20T21:41:10 is the revision to which the anon would have been referring. The Price is Right is the correct reference. Not sure if the wheel was numbered correctly myself — that may have been WP:OR. The Showcase Showdown (The Price Is Right) article is surprisingly detailed. / edg ☺ ☭ 03:48, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Price is Right note
Talk:Sister-in-law

message: I'm concerned that "sibling's wife" may have been changed to "brother's wife" by someone who disapproves of gay marriage.  I've changed it back since, like it or not, gay marriage is legal in many countries and several US states, and the definition of this term must allow for that.  12.45.255.66 (talk) 19:32, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I would say that the concerns are absolutely valid. Now we have to ask what to do when sources are wrong.  Clearly a woman can marry another woman and a man can marry a man so a a more general definition is necessary.  But it's true that we need sources. JIMp talk·cont 09:53, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Sister's wife

message: Does a sibling's spouse's sister count? (My sister has married a man whose sister is Erica. Is Erica my sister-in-law?) 71.48.61.43 (talk) 03:25, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Sibling's spouse's sister

message: "Example: Rob and Neil are brothers. Gwyneth is Rob's wife. Claire is Neil's wife. Therefore, Gwyneth is Neil's sister-in-law, Claire is Rob's sister-in-law and Gwyneth and Claire are sisters-in-law to one another."
Would Gwyneth and Claire be co-sisters-in-law, to be more precise? --jftsang 08:35, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The example on the page 

message: added the Motley's Crew example, I don't see how it is relevant to the article, so I removed it. Two highly notable examples (Bible and Harry Potter related) are already enough. But even if they were not enough, I don't think Motley's Crew is "notable" or "famous" enough. User GVnayR is clearly trying desperately to "promote" Motley's Crew. --92.250.123.108 (talk) 10:11, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Motley's Crew?