lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Softball at the 2008 Summer Olympics

message: Chinese Taipei is not a location, so that has been changed accordingly.  The footnote is as per the agreement reached during the 2006 Asian Games to clarify what Chinese Taipei is without giving the indication that it is somehow competing under the name Taiwan.  ludahai 魯大海 09:27, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Taiwan and Chinese Taipei

message: This is an unusual format.  In most round robin competitions (including the Beijing Handball and Water Polo tournaments), the losers of both semi-finals play against each other for the Bronze, while the winners compete for Gold.  Ergo, wouldn't it be appropriate to add a note to the Bronze Medal match section indicating the it is the loser that is awarded the Bronze Medal? If nobody responds by Friday, I might just do it myself.  Devahn58 (talk) 15:19, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You people can use  to visually represent the tourney. –Howard the Duck 16:44, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Competition Format

message: in the opening paragraph the final sentence is Olympic softball is competed by women only, with men competing in the similar sport of baseball. I dont think this sentence is worded quite right, To me it is saying at the Olympics women play softball and men play baseball, which in some ways is true but leaves the door open to men who play softball are playing baseball in the Olympics or men don't play softball, im just not sure on a better way of wording it, any ideas? --Dan027 (talk) 09:50, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Olympic softball

message: At the end of play on Aug 17, China and Chinese Taipei are mathematically elimated as they lose all tie-breakers with Canada, with any combination of teams involved.  Venezuela can still qualify for the playoff round if they win, and Canada loses.  
--(Bandtree) (talk)  21:00, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Elimination of China and Chinese Taipei
Talk:Laccaria bicolor

message: This page references the fungus predating insects, specifically springtails, but, as the springtail page itself notes, springtails aren't insects.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1702:2F30:1870:C4CF:F79F:D93F:59C8 (talk) 03:18, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Springtails aren't insects
Talk:Lycoperdon umbrinum

message: All over the world? Mostly in California (note External link)?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ed8r (talk • contribs) 16:57, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I second the (implied) comment.  This article really needs a section, pararaph, or even just a sentence on the distribution of this species.  I'd insert one, but the source material doesn't exactly agree.--Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 19:19, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Found where?
Talk:One shot

message: I moved some definitions over to the talk page of  wiktionary "one-shot". I also deleted
* an electronic one-shot, see Pulse generator. 
because that linked article doesn't mention "one shot". Either make sure Pulse generator uses that word (then it can be linked again from this disambiguation page) or include that definition in wiktionary. – sgeureka t•c 11:41, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup
Talk:Do No Wrong

message: :Image:13s do no wrong.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 00:39, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:13s do no wrong.jpg
Talk:White of the Eye

message: A web search finds this assertion, unsourced in the article, made by a blogger: http://somnambulantreviews.blogspot.com/2011/01/white-of-eye-1987.html
Not a reliable source...visual similarities look to me to be the result of shooting in similar locayions -- maybe both were shot in AZ, I don't know. Bustter (talk) 13:37, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  homage to supervixens
Talk:Dallas World Aquarium

message: This article needs more photos of the aquarium. There are plenty of closeups of animals at the zoo, but these are not particularly helpful in illustrating an article which is about the zoo, not about the animals. Donlammers (talk) 14:47, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: There's a photo of the front entrance, which is fine for me. Hasteur (talk) 01:36, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Photos (2010-08)

message: As it was written, the Controversy section was extremely biased against DWA.  The referenced article even had a correction saying that the original article was misleading, but that was not reflected here.  I removed the biased language, mentioned that DWA had the proper permits, and added another reference. Raran75 (talk) 00:27, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy
Category talk:Mountaineering

message: This category could quite easily become a list of mountains, climbers and expeditions, of which there are plenty already - eg List of mountains by elevation, List of climbers. This probably isn't a good thing, so I have removed the somewhat arbitrary listings of eg Arlene Blum, Hans Gmoser, South Col, North Col, Nun Kun, Kangshung Face, 1905 Kangchenjunga Expedition etc. Ericoides 09:48, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Also removed lists of mountains in the USA/N. America/Mexico because if they are in then we also need the Alps, Andes, Himalaya etc Ericoides (talk) 09:10, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Not a list of mountains or climbers
Talk:Unified messaging

message: Do we really need all of these vendor links? What value do they add? JanCeuleers 09:58, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Vendors?

message: Does unified messaging include Instant Messaging? Notopia 09:44, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  UM and IM 

message: How does U.S. patent number 5,557,659 (mentioned in the voice mail article) play into this?  --anonymous  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.212.242.19 (talk) 21:43, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  patent issues? 

message: As the article correctly notes lower down, there is not yet a single "definition" for UM.  The introduction, however, does not make that clear.  Instead, it has two mutually contradictory sentences (pasted below) - the first saying that UM and UC are synonyms, the second that UM is a subset of UC.  Since Unified Communications redirects to this page and we don't have a separate page yet, I am going to assume that the former is closer to true despite the news cites for both usages.  Pending someone finding a better use for that cite, I have pulled the second sentence.  Rossami (talk) 16:06, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Unified Messaging (or UM), also known as Unified Communications (or UC) is the integration of different electronic messaging and communications media (e-mail, SMS, Fax, voicemail, video messaging, etc.) technologies into a single interface, accessible from a variety of different devices. Unified messaging is a subset of a fully integrated Unified communications system.
I agree there was a lot of inconsistency, however UM and UC are definitely not the same. I am removing part "also known as Unified Communications ", because UM is a part of UC. UM doesn't have real time communication services. "unified messaging is simply one element of a UC solution"["What UC is and isn't"  Blair Pleasant]  Klapouchy (talk) 22:51, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistent definitions 
Talk:Andrew Walker (barrister)

message: Born 1968, based on age quoted in Daily Mail article from 19 March 2008 -- Solipsist (talk) 11:18, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Partial DoB
Talk:2007 Malta Cup

message: hi there
i took a template for this article from 2006 football (soccer) world cup - s article
my problem with this one is that it has a game "scheduled" for the 3rd place
in snooker though, they don't do that.
can someone pls tell me how can I modify this template to lose the game for 3rd place?
(i'll keep on searching, maybe i find something)
thanks
[The previous unsigned comment was added by , 05:09, February 7, 2007]
:Shouldn't be hard, but do the tied-for-third finishers actually get no prize money and no recognition? — SMcCandlish [talk] [contrib] ツ 01:50, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: PS: While you can rip the Polish version of the article's code to get rid of that box, what is the harm in retaining it? — SMcCandlish [talk] [contrib] ツ 05:18, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: I need help

message: Unless ALL of these people are British, these entries all need , etc.: 
For after the first occurrence (column 2, etc.) use : 
Or even more specific than GBR, if they are identified as English, Scottish, Welsh, N.Irish, etc., as well French and so forth for non-British competitors.
See Wikipedia:WikiProject Flag Template for details.
— SMcCandlish [talk] [contrib] ツ 01:50, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: PS: See left menu for Polish version.  Kind of embarassing that theirs is better than ours!  Heh.  Aside from the flags, the the fact that it has an intro is rather vital.  Most people would perpetually classify this as a stub if it has no introductory text explaining what it is at all (remember the "Random page" feature...)  — SMcCandlish [talk] [contrib] ツ 05:17, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Need flags
Talk:Beltrum

message: This Beltrum-page can be extended with: 
education: what schools are there and where do the students go?
sports: what kind of sports does Beltrum offer?
events: events that are characteristic for Beltrum?
Are there more subjects? 
Also: a dutch, german and french translation is needed.
Who can help?
--82.93.36.164 10:13, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Buddenbrockia plumatellae

message: A shared gene placed Buddenbrokia as a Myxozoan.  But - as the second article said - its independent existence meant that more extensive DNA studies could be done.  These placed it - and implicitly all members of Phylum Myxozoan - much closer to the Radians than the Bilaterans.--GwydionM 20:28, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: DNA evidence
Talk:Madonna wannabe

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot 10:32, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-02-7 Automated pywikipediabot message 

message: This section no contains reputable sources. So, can become a primary source. Meanwhile, I think it best to erase it, for not there are reputable sources. Best regards, Chrishonduras (talk) 04:40, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: No proceed. very "reputable" source is a fallacy. Are these two major websites that BBC, Time, The New York Times or Allmusic?. Well you're wrong in every way. Regardless, that information can not be with these two references to unreliable, because it will become a primary source. Best regards, Chrishonduras (talk) 15:38, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagiarism allegations against Madonna 

message: References are fine to me, but the whole article can be expanded a lot more. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 04:04, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Goodies, so we can work on it more. I have seen a few books also tailoring how the style came into ecxistence. Lemme check out the links you posted. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 04:04, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion

message: Listing references for expansion. —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 09:23, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Coquito

message: This seems like a good candidate to merge with Egg cream or some other related egg-based drink that is also stubby. The article could discuss these drinks in a general manner, and then give regional examples (like this one). Other thoughts? --Willscrlt (Talk·Cntrb) 10:38, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Works for me, but I think the article would be better off merged into eggnog rather than egg cream; egg creams are of a radically different breed :) --Jitterro 00:01, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Coquito traditionally IS NOT egg based —Moebiusuibeom-en (talk) 15:54, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?
Talk:Osu Castle

message: Excellent article! It's always nice to see African countries getting attention like this. I enjoyed this one.  — Brian (talk) 12:01, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Incidentally, here are a few freely licensed images of the castle from Flickr: one (CC Attribution) and two (CC Attribution Share-Alike). Neither is better than the drawing as the main picture, but they might be worth uploading to Commons and adding to the later parts of the article. — Brian (talk) 12:08, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Cheers. I'll upload a crop of the first one to commons. The best picture I found (sadly copyrighted) was a series of line drawings showing the castle in various stages of development which was very informative. --Cherry blossom tree 23:08, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The colony history begin in 1821. Before that time the word colony should not be used. --Krgj (talk) 21:37, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kudos! 

message: Write about the osu castle in french 41.215.172.14 (talk) 22:46, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Write about the osu castle in french
Talk:Matty Hull

message: OK, in light of the concerns above I've created another article to discuss the fratricide incident and ported material over there.  This article has, as a consequence, been significantly slimmed down.  I have to admit that I'm struggling to turn the other article into something meaningful, I've realised that most of it is cut and paste from media reporting and doesn't really hang together as an article, key elements of information are missing.  Unfortunately that's a consequence of using almost exclusively primary reportage sources.
With all that in mind I'm happy to remove the NPOV tag, for the moment.  If someone reverts what I've done then it'll go back on again for the reasons outlined above.
ALR 21:34, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rework
Talk:Harri Olli

message: While it is probably true, I don't think it is very encyclopedic to write 'go fuck yourself'. 80.222.92.196 (talk) 13:55, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Majoritarian democracy

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot 10:52, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-02-7 Automated pywikipediabot message 

message: The UK's official legal stance is still Constitutional Monarchy with no written constitution at all. 47.20.242.106 (talk) 08:08, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  The UK is not a democracy 

message: There are no citations of the most important assertions. There are no examples given of "majoritarian democracies," only a short list of states that are not. StN (talk) 22:55, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this an encyclopedia article?
Talk:Adrianus Valerius

message: The statement the song was introduced by settlers in New Amsterdam is present in the source but this seems nonetheless unfounded. Valerius didn't remain consistently popular after the Eighty Years' War and his newfound popularity began in the nineteenth century. The English translation was from 1894.  That it was brought to the American colonies is uncertain but perhaps possible, but if so this does certainly not have any link to the modern English version. It looks too tenuous and irrelevant to mention. 195.169.52.66 (talk) 12:28, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious
Talk:Jukka Salmela

message: With respect, I would argue that Salmela is "mid", not "low", on the importance scale of Finnish matters. He set a world record time in a sport that once was considered mainstream in Finland, in an event in which Finnish athletes again are among the best in the world. Slavatrudu 09:34, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Duke of Ciudad Rodrigo

message: When did the Spanish "dukedom" of the 7th Duke of Wellington end? And when did that of the 8th Duke of Wellington start? Either the ceding was in 1968 or in 1972 (when the 7th Duke died).VM 10:57, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks to me like it was in 1968. Proteus (Talk) 20:31, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

text: If this is the case then shouldn't Marquess of Douro be listed as the proper Duque now? The link cited on the page says that he and his father agreed that the title would be ceded to Lord Douro on a date that has passed, but this page and theirs all say that he is still heir to it. Can the title be fully passed during the Duke of Wellington's lifetime? And if not, what is the purpose and intent of the declaration described in that document? Andrei Iosifovich (talk) 20:50, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting! So how does this work now? Did Lord Douro become Duke of Ciudad Rodrigo or did he just claim it? If he has just claimed it, the title of Duke of Ciudad Rodrigo is currently vacant, right? Surtsicna (talk) 22:35, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

message: It is no longer true that the dukedom passes to the heirs-general: pursuant to Act 33/2006, males and females are equally treated regarding succession to titles of nobility. So, from now onwards, the first-born child of each duke will succeed (unless they agree to the contrary, as they did in the past). Therefore, I think the paragraph explaining the rules of succession should be changed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.57.71.91 (talk) 16:23, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Succession
Talk:Clas Thunberg

message: A case could be made that in a certain sense Clas Thunberg is the most successful Olympian ever.
See List of multiple gold medalists ranked by share of won Olympic events.
No other athlete ever won such a high percentage of all Olympic events at a single Games.
And he not only holds 1st but also also 3rd place in this ranking!
SpitzPhelps (talk) 20:26, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clas Thunberg Most Successful Olympian Ever?
Talk:Omphalotus

message: I want to see a photo of these things glowing in the dark! (Heroeswithmetaphors) talk 21:55, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  bio-luminescence photo! 

message: The 'Taxonomy' section which states "The group has been classified in their own family Omphalotaceae" is not consistent with the taxobox of the article. Which one is the correct? Kingfacundo (talk) 22:49, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taxonomy not consistent
Talk:Zealots of Thessalonica

message: I find this topic to be extremely interesting, however I have no idea where to look for more information as Google has not been of great help. So I'd like to put up a request for sources here: Bibliography, external links, references, the lot. Anyone more knowledgeable offering to help? --Michalis Famelis (talk) 11:19, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requests 
Talk:Penicillium camemberti

message: Unless there's some meaning of synonym in biology that I'm not aware of, we don't need 2 articles about the same species. ChrisHodgesUK (talk) 14:15, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: They aren't synonyms; Penicillium candidum Roger (1923) (illegitimate name, invalid species; this is a synonym of Penicillium camemberti Thom) ≠ Penicillium candidum Link (1809) (legitimate name, valid species). Sasata (talk) 15:14, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  Fair enough - I assumed the article was correct when I proposed merging.  Thanks Sasata for sorting it out.  ChrisHodgesUK (talk) 10:25, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed Merge

message: The article states "An allergy to the antibiotic penicillin does not necessarily imply an allergy to cheeses made using P. camemberti.[2]"  
UPDATE 11 February 2013: Several days ago, I received this message from a reader, which is important information to share: “I have just read your report on the above having just left the A & E department because my wife, who is allergic to penicillin medication, had an allergic reaction after eating Brie and Stilton after a meal last night. The reaction was identical to that she had suffered after a course of penicillin antibiotics. Having read other articles, many people are advising there is no link between the two, and that you can eat any cheese whenever you like. That certainly was not the case with my wife. Yours sincerely, Martin D.”  Martin wrote back to me one week later to advise: “My wife had her steroid dosage increased on Monday, and she finally lost the hives all over her body by Friday, yesterday.”
<ref>Excerpted from http://blog.onespotallergy.com/2012/01/if-im-allergic-to-penicillin-can-i-eat-blue-cheese-made-with-penicillium-mold/<ref>
My question: should the article be amended to reflect the fact that there is anecdotal evidence that some people with penicillin sensitivity have had reactions from eating these cheeses?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rivergod (talk • contribs) 08:27, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible contraindication for people with penicillin allergy

message: The white brindle is called pencillium  is it save to eat if allergic to penicillin? 68.129.13.123 (talk) 20:34, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  White rind on brie
Talk:Penicillium glaucum

message: As is, this page is confusing.  P. glaucum referred to a huge number of molds, and the last lines claim "glaucum" is rejected as an individual Penicillium name now and blue cheese molds are all roqueforti, but then there are differentiations made between it and roqueforti all over this article and most other articles on the cheeses themselves and on the Penicillium page.  Assuming the name is rejected for a single mold species, presumably somebody would have analyzed which ones are used and determined a difference?   These are food products and the contents tend to be scrutinized very heavily, especially when a live biological culture is involved.  I've no idea where to track down the appropriate analyses of what types are used short of contacting cheese manufacturers for more detailed info. 
In addition to that and in light of P. glaucum being used to refer to almost anything when major research on antibiotic properties were beginning, the information about researches doesn't seem to fit very well here and doesn't match what is available on History of penicillin.  Finally the blurb about Duchesne seems out of place since from what I can gather from his page and the penicillin history there were valid reasons for his dissertation being ignored at the time and nobody is even certain he was working with a Penicillium based on the activity he discovered, since when penicillin itself was finally isolated it did not cure typhoid like whatever mold Duchesne was injecting into his test animals did.  A Shortfall Of Gravitas (talk) 06:07, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Odd contradictions in this page
Talk:The Boot Room

message: It would be good if someone could source a picture for this - I'm sure I've seen pictures of Shanks drinking tea in there, etc. Gavinio 11:23, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture? 

message: In the opening of the article is says "during the 1960s - early 1990s", but the 2011–12 League Cup is included under Kenny Dalglish Honours !--MR.HJH (talk) 03:55, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  2011–12 League Cup