Talk:Mantis (Marvel Comics)

message: This was one of the best characters ever introduced and certainly a huge change from others we'd seen before (at least up until the 70s at this point).  Mantis' pasttime as a prostitute,though never actually stated in the original run (I think Englehart said she was a "barmaid") doesnt make sense, considering all the time and energy the priests of Pama put into her training.  I mean, seriously- would you devote that kind of work into someone and then let them go off and become a man's plaything? In fact, is this an occupation she would even have taken?? Given her obvious intelligence, supreme martial arts skills, etc. life as a "barmaid" just wouldnt ever have been a reality for her.
But wasn't that part of the original quasi-religious concept? She's a Mary Magdalene archetype; from humble beginnings, the Celestial Madonna is born. She's a symbol for the joined virgin/whore dichotomy, and she gets to have both aspects and still be respected, revered, etc. That's what I always thought Englehart was saying with the character.--Erikacornia 18:46, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Surely we can find a better depiction of Mantis for the info box than that horrid illustration of a character that wasn't even her from heroes reborn, can't we? Cockrum did some lovely illustrations of her. I don't know enough to edit that part well, but here's asking.--Erikacornia 18:49, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Someone please find a better one and change the picture! STFmaryville 11:47, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Iconic image? 

message: It just occurred to me that Mantis's later ability to shift her consciousness across the universe, from one world's vegetation to another, is exactly like the Swamp Thing's ability. Not suggesting it's a swipe or anything either way, but it may be worthwhile to mention it in the article. Korvac 16:24, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trans"plant"ataion 

message: They get listed as aliases in the box, but the history (understandably) skips over her non-Marvel history. Maybe this should be mentioned in a "Trivia" section or something? Daibhid C 10:01, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I asked Steve Englehart where I might find a decent account of the character's journey through Marvel, DC, Eclipse, and back to Marvel. He comments on it in the relevant points at his website , but a complete account has yet to be published. He said he "very much enjoyed moving her from company" and thinks an article about the trip along the way would be fun. Doczilla 04:46, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Willow, Lorelei

message: Seeing as Mantis is going to be in the forthcoming 'Annihilation: Conquest: Starlord' mini-series, should this be mentioned in her bio or should it wait to be edited in until the mini-series is out this Summer? I'm kinda surprised she went from the Avengers to Peter Quill's new space team, but eh, whatever.
Mekairinek 21:02, 09 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: WikiProject Comics guidelines say to wait until it happens within the canon. Doczilla 03:49, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Annihilation: Conquest?

message: Should this information be presented as canon?  I like the idea of seeing this info in the article, but I don't think we should have her hopping from one company to another displayed as part of the Marvel canon. 204.153.84.10 15:11, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Intercompany history

message: :Image:Celestial Madonna.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 11:34, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Celestial Madonna.jpg

message: :Image:Mantisavengers131.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 00:50, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Mantisavengers131.jpg

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Mantis (Marvel Comics). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160510114314/http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2005/09/15/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-16/3/ to http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2005/09/15/comic-book-urban-legends-revealed-16/3/
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://deadline.com/2015/10/sand-castle-adds-comptons-neil-brown-jr-guardians-2-casts-pom-klementieff-in-mystery-role-mantis-1201597456/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:18, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Do you think we could expand a bit on her habit of referring to herself in the third person (like I did in this edit)? This speech mannerism of hers is mentioned in almost every source that describes her. --GLTPRE (talk) 15:47, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for starting a discussion on this matter. If this aspect is so important and so frequently discussed, then please provide a source that's more apt. Screenrant's "article" does not (to me) seem like a reliable source. Checkout out Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources for more info. Nor does it support the conclusions you are inferring from it, which is called WP:SYNTHESIS. JesseRafe (talk) 16:04, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mantis referring to herself as "this one"