lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Tulsa race massacre

message: The Tulsa event is historically problematic because despite being a very real event it has been subject to journalistic sensationalism, dramatization, politicization, and folk myth.
Editorial selection is therefore challenging, not least since if we think we already know the story we are likely to be influenced by that questionable foreknowledge to include elements which confirm our expectations, and to omit or ignore material which runs counter to our expectations.
But despite those difficulties this wikipage is still by far the best source of information about the Tulsa event of 1921 available on the Internet.
There are however some areas which should be improved:
1.The title Tulsa Race 'Massacre' is fine; that is the official designation the event now goes by. But the word 'massacre' needs to be used with care and discretion in the general text, first because there were in effect two massacres, one of whites and one of blacks; and indeed the second of those might be equally described as a 'battle' rather than a 'massacre'.
2.The Klu Klux Klan rightly gets a mention, it's exactly what we would expect. But what about the role of the  African Blood Brotherhood? At the time it was the ABB which was widely blamed for the whole debacle. Meanwhile the ABB claimed that in the aftermath there were indeed secret mass graves - but of white casualties, not of black! Here's one link, but there are many others:
https://revolutionsnewsstand.com/2023/02/10/the-tulsa-riot-by-commander-tulsa-post-african-blood-brotherhood-from-the-crusader-vol-4-no-5-july-1921/
3. 'Buck' Franklin's celebrated account of the bombing of Greenwood rightly gets given prominence. It was given extensive publicity when it was discovered. It's content is exactly what we would expect. But any college student who quotes from it will himself/herself  surely get shot down in academic flames if he or she fails to mention that, puzzlingly, Franklin published a very different and totally contradictory account of his experiences in his autobiography 'My Life and an Era' (Available from Amazon). Far better, and academically proper, to quote from both.
These criticisms aside I'd like to emphasize that this wikipage is by far the best source of information available about this complicated, confused and confusing subject. All other sources are far less trustworthy and/or omit key information. Well done wikipedians. 92.26.176.67 (talk) 12:25, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: It is incorrect to propose that contemporary news items would be valuable here. What's valuable is the careful analysis of scholars and historians. Recent scholarship is usually best. Binksternet (talk) 13:29, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Praise and Problems
Talk:David Bernstein (law professor)

message: This article survived an Articles for Deletion debate. The discussion can be found here. -Splashtalk 00:15, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: And the article survived another one. The discussion can be found here. Titoxd(?!?) 01:19, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Articles for Deletion debate
Talk:Elizabeth Tudor (1492–1495)

message: Did Elizebeth Tudor kill more catholics than Mary Tudor killed protosants?
:Surely you're thinking of Elizabeth I, and not this Elizabeth Tudor (who, had she lived, would have been Queen Elizabeth's aunt)? -- Melissa Della 07:23, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've removed the unreferenced mention of atrophy per an online discussion with a historian which of course I cannot find now. Apparently the "diagnosis" of atrophy is a Victorian misunderstanding of an inscription that once graced the little princess's tomb. It was at the time fashionable to namecheck the Greek goddess Atropos on tombs of those who died unexpectedly (don't ask me why); the King and Queen had been visiting their daughter and in fact had just left her the day before when news arrived of her death, which from letters and chronicles of the time was entirely unexpected. Atrophy (or, better put, any disease that would cause it) also takes weeks to kill but Elizabeth was known to be healthy at the time her parents visited her. She probably died of one of those infectious diseases that used to kill children in hours - meningitis, croup, etc. - or accidentally. Gah, how sad. 24.76.103.169 (talk) 19:34, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Removing mention of atrophy

message: Is the English translation correct? She was not the second child, but the fourth. She was the second daughter, but the fourth child. 2600:1700:BC01:9B0:F439:C0AD:39D9:9345 (talk) 03:32, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation
Talk:Martin Luther

message: What a laughable comment. In Robert Michael's view? In every sane literate person's view. GMS.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.151.17.68 (talk) 15:30, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  In Robert Michael's view, Luther's words "We are at fault in not slaying them" amounted to a sanction for murder 

message: this doesnt follow the guide lines so yourwe not sigm 135.135.93.91 (talk) 20:52, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Aoidh (talk) 20:57, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 5 November 2023 

message: Not super relevant, but, on the 4th paragraph of the 'Education' section is the following ending to the first sentence:
"(...)but none about loving God, which to Luther believed was more important."
It should be either "which to Luther was" or "which Luther believed was", or some better option. Hope you see my point and if there's time check the rest of the article for similar problems. Thank you in advance. 2001:1388:13A7:3987:6CB0:5B94:781B:F5D3 (talk) 20:31, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I've changed it. I think this works. Indyguy (talk) 01:13, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit Request 

message: Under section "Diet of Worms (1521)" appears the text "On 18 April 1521, Luther appeared as ordered before the Diet of Worms." The date should be changed to 17 April 1521, as noted in the linked Wikipedia page for the Diet of Worms and in the following article in the World History Encyclopedia: https://www.worldhistory.org/article/1900/luthers-speech-at-the-diet-of-worms/ (the link should also be added as a reference for that line). MikeStickles (talk) 00:24, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Awhellnawr123214 (talk) 01:04, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 17 April 2024
Talk:AA

message: I have removed the following since it does not appear that any are abbreviated AA:
* A.A. pseudonym of Elizabeth Barrett Browning
* Al Ain, a city in Abu Dhabi
*Codes used on vehicle registration plates:
** Burgas Province, Bulgaria
** Ostalbkreis (for Aalen), Germany
** Kiev, Ukraine
* American Atheists, an organization founded by Madalyn Murray O'Hair
* allyl alcohol, an important organic precursor molecule
* Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, a species of bacteria found to be in association with certain types of periodontal disease
* Anti-aliasing (disambiguation), signal and image processing techniques
* Adobe Analytics
* Amplitude of accommodation, a measurement of the eye's ability to focus clearly on objects at near distances
* Antarctic Impulse Transient Antenna, also known as AA-experiment
* Asociación Alumni, an Argentinean rugby union club
* Asking Alexandria (British metalcore band)
I'm willing to put them back with sources. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 03:10, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Entries removed 

message: While working through disambiguations, I noticed that there is a page with the title "AA" that redirects to here, AA. How is that possible? There must be some hidden character I'm not seeing, because I can't link to that redirect page no matter what I try. — Gorthian (talk) 06:28, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you mean АА? It's Cyrillic. (Copy and paste titles into this web page to figure out what the hell they are). There is a page linking to that title, so I'll take a look, and then send to RfD. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 13:17, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow. Now I can see it when I check the page source. Thank you for the clue! (and for the RfD) — Gorthian (talk) 18:19, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect from the same page name? 

message: A requested move discussion at Aa River resulted in a consensus to merge the contents of that page into this disambiguation page. A record of that discussion, together with my closing comments, is available  here. Bradv 05:01, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I have cleaned up the page and removed the cleanup tag and comment.  The inclusion of rivers not actually named Aa and red-linked rivers called Aa without articles that mention Aa, have been removed:  they may have made sense on a page about rivers called Aa, but not on the Aa disambiguation page.  (Actually my first reaction on looking at the page was to split out the rivers!) Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:06, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Gordon Buehrig

message: This article contains a red link to Weymann. I suppose Charles Terres Weymann is meant; anyone who feels sure about this, may correct the link. Bertux (talk) 08:53, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is Weymann the same as Charles Terres Weymann? 
Talk:Bulgarian unification

message: According to R.J. Crampton's A concise history of Bulgaria the coup d'etat took place on September 18, not September 5. The discrepancy is because of the difference between the Julian and the Gregorian calendar, Bulgaria didn't change until 1916; March 31, 1916 was followed by April 14, 1916. Thuresson 00:37, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: So we should move all the dates to the Julian calendar and leave only a note about the holiday, why it's celebrated on the 6th? --Martyr 09:01, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Nightstallion, you shouldn't have moved the page without asking — this needs to be discussed. I'm opposed to the move; a Google test shows "Unification of Bulgaria" is the more popular term. Also, I don't see that many other examples to set a precedent. Todor→Bozhinov 11:14, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Those terms are equivalent, so the only reason to favour one over the other seems to be standardisation; and we've got German reunification, Yemenite reunification, Italian unification, Chinese reunification, Irish reunification and Korean reunification. Seems to be a pattern to me... —Nightstallion (?) 12:08, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Page move

message: The section on "Background" gives a decidedly pro-Bulgarian slant on the question of Bulgaria's proper borders.  This might seem irrelevant after nearly 100 years, but Macedonia apparently still matters.Specifically, the article identifies the borders of San Stefano as "the ethnic borders of the Bulgarians," including historical Macedonia, Adrianople, and parts of Serbia.  This point might be contentious, as the ethnic mix of the outer regions is questionable.  A citation here would help to defend this wording.Solomon Rose (talk) 01:06, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slanted language?
Talk:Doane Stuart School

message: Doane Stuart's campus is not "rural".  The school may be on 70+ acres, but it is located right in Albany NY minutes from the bustling downtown.  "Bucolic" best describes the DS campus
SONORAMA 00:38, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Rural

message: I disagree that the school mission section should be classified as 'containing peacock terms.'  The principles of "ecumenism" and others are actual phrases used by Doane Stuart to describe their school community and mission. Kdka421 22:06, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's the problem, we should be using second and third party sources and not what Doane Stuart describes themselves because they have a COI in that they of course WILL use peacock terms to describe their community and mission, their goal is to get new students, our goal is to tell describe the school in a factual neutral way. Sure there are plenty of Times Union articles that can be used.Camelbinky (talk) 23:26, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Peacock Terms

message: Other than the history section, the article is pretty much unsourced. In addition, the material in the article is not likely to be the type of material for which reliable sources may be found; most of it looks like it's pulled from the school's website. Most of it should be removed. SunCrow (talk) 08:00, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed unsourced sections. SunCrow (talk) 08:05, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sourcing problems
Talk:Victoria of Coburg

message: Of course I support the move from Victoria of Coburg to Victoria of Saxe-Coburg. Arrigo 21:34, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: Two persons voted, one for the move, one against it, summary:
*1 vote out of 2 supporting move = 50% <60%, conclusion: No Move
Implemented result of vote, trying to help out with WP:RM backlog, and remove the topic there. --Francis Schonken 08:31, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Vote count report, 9 days after start of vote

message: (from WP:RM, under section header "===19 September 2005===":)
* Talk:Victoria of Coburg — Victoria of Coburg → Victoria of Saxe-Coburg – presumably not a controversial move. Admin help needed as the target address has edit history. Arrigo 22:55, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional comments
Talk:Irish traditional music session

message: Sessions in Ireland are not limited to playing tunes.  There are also singing sessions and mixed sessions (mainly singing with some tunes or mainly tunes with some singing).  These should be mentioned when talking about Irish sessions.  
It's correct that sessions can take place anywhere, not necessarily in a pub.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hohenloh (talk • contribs) 12:55, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Singing sessions, mixed sessions 

message: Why remove the Category Irish Music from this article?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hohenloh (talk • contribs) 12:59, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categories
Talk:Quadratic integral

message: As now written, this article appears to assume either that
* the roots are real;
or that
* there's no reason to comment on any technicalities arising from the "multiple-valued" nature of the logarithm function once complex numbers are admitted into this discussion.
Maybe I'll be back. Michael Hardy 00:52, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, an issue here. At the intended level, surely it's best to split into cases, according to the sign of the discriminant. Charles Matthews 10:23, 20 September 2005 (UTC)

message: This article was listed on Wikipedia:Copyright problems 23 Feb 2006 due to its resemblence to Mathworld's page.  Obviously the equations can be expected to be similar, but the rest is too.  For instance, the text part of the Wikipedia article now reads:
   In mathematics, a quadratic integral of the form
   may be computed by completing the square in the denominator.
   is the negative of the discriminant. When q < 0, then
   By use of partial fraction decomposition,
while the Mathworld article reads
   To compute an integral of the form
   complete the square in the denominator to obtain
   is the negative of the polynomial discriminant. If q<0, then
   Now use partial fraction decomposition, 
In the equations, both have the odd business of "defining" −A2 and then deriving A from it, and also the odd use of equivalence signs, particularly the use of two of them in the −A2 line.
The listing on Wikipedia:Copyright problems for a couple of weeks drew only this comment:
*Is this really copyrightable? I mean, it's just math. If one were to write an article about the subject, wouldn't it basically just come out almost the same? howcheng {chat} 01:01, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem? 

message: Hasn't this article interchanged the conventional roles of a and c? Michael Hardy 18:52, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: notational conventions
Talk:Isobar

message: can isobars cross?????
:no, they represent lines of constant pressure and can be used to infer wind directions and speeds.Dr Denim 19:34, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There is such a page, Contour line, and I'm proposing to merge all the stub "iso-" articles into it. The merge proposal does not include the nuclear definitions, and would not replace the disambiguation page, but would only move the barometric material to the Contour line article--Natcase 04:42, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
File talk:Zion angels landing view.jpg

message: That's spectacular. Very nice. What filters did you use? I'm guessing a graduated ND filter. —BenFrantzDale 00:55, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. Actually no, I just lifted the shadows in the canyon slightly in photoshop and increased saturation to bring out the natural colours a little. Diliff 03:56, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: OK. I put it up as ane example in graduated ND filter and I think I'll leave it there since, despite not using that filter, it does reflect that look nicely. —BenFrantzDale 05:04, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sergei Grinkov

message: what is one of Sergeis most memorable quotes.
:I added one, which seems to be most memorable for me. If you know another memorable one, please, add it here or into the article. Cmapm 14:36, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  Excellent job, both of you. Softlavender (talk) 12:29, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Quotes

message: With all due respect to the authors and subject matter, does this article really deserve a "Top" importance rating in WikiProject Figure Skating? With Ekaterina Gordeeva receiving a "High" rating, how does one justify the "Top" rating? Jcflnj (talk) 18:25, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importance Rating 
Talk:Graduated neutral-density filter

message: I believe this picture is an example we could use here:
—BenFrantzDale 01:05, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a high dynamic range image, and doesn't look like it used a grad ND filter. 203.132.66.13 09:36, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

text: Isn't anyone going to comment on the question I raised above?? Charlie Richmond 15:49, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Normally, this would mean 1 stop: 2^1 == 2.  2 stops: 2^2 = 4 ==> ND4. 3 stops: 2^3 = 8 ==> ND8. 4 stops: 2^4 = 16 ==> ND16. But this is just one of the possible notations. Mikus (talk) 04:26, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Charlie, the number designation on a ND filter does not directly correlate the number of stops of light it reduces. Personally I think article your referenced (Neutral density filter) needs to be rewritten, as the chart provided is not absolute, and depending on the manufacturer of the filter the actual reduction in light can be different. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Cnjackson (talk • contribs) 18:03, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2ND vs 1 stop reduction 

message: I suggest combining this article with the "ND filter" article. Both articles are rather small and cover the same topic, so they will benefit from the merge.Mikus (talk) 18:53, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Combine with ND filter article
Talk:Chris Boucher (writer)

message: Anon removes it on the grounds that it is by a different author. While this appears plausible given that Frank's War appears to be non-science fiction  and published in the US, it appears on on-line catalogs under "our" Chris Boucher. I have no hits for Chris P. Boucher and Frank's War on Google. Can someone confirm this as simply a case of mistaken identity? --khaosworks (talk • contribs) 01:13, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: There is currently an Article for Deletion process underway regarding the author of the Frank's War, one Chris P. Boucher. The AFD appears to be moving towards deleting this other Boucher's article on the grounds of non-notability, however I think it's worth noting that these are two different writers. Therefore I added a line to this effect. The discussion can be found at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris P. Boucher. The anon appears to be Chris P. Boucher himself. 23skidoo 03:14, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Frank's War

message: Did not Mr Boucher work with the Australian Broadcasting Corportion back around 1972/3? I seem to recall meeting and recording some material with him at their studio in Forbes Street, Darlinghurst. I believe he was a producer for the ABC Radio's 'Young World' program. Bluedawe 22:47, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Work for ABC in Australia 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Consensus to move page and make Chris Boucher a DAB page. (closed by non-admin page mover)  — YoungForever(talk)  07:25, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Chris Boucher →  – no clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC Joeykai (talk) 07:11, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 25 December 2020 

message: Chris Boucher is now the last surviving Doctor Who scriptwriter from prior to the 1980s/John Nathan Turner era (Season 18 onward) since the deaths of Henry Lincoln and Bob Baker. Romomusicfan (talk) 10:27, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: https://tardis.fandom.com/wiki/Chris_Boucher Romomusicfan (talk) 10:29, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  Well now he's gone.  Still the Dr Who News article is a source for this point now.Romomusicfan (talk) 11:36, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last surviving Doctor Who writer pre-1980
Talk:Charles Hatfield

message: Great song about this rainmaker by Widespread Panic
- D. Streier
what kind of chemical he used is what i wanna know.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.235.165.225 (talk) 23:49, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I found this reference but don't want to do any major editing on my phone, if anyone wants to add it in. MjolnirPants Tell me all about it. 17:30, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  reference 
Talk:Moalboal

message: "The resorts at the remaining white beach tend to be quieter and generally have better rooms. The 3 main resorts are Ravenala, Club Serena and The Blue Orchid Resort. All of them offer both boat and shore diving. The shore diving from White beach is exceptional!!  The fish feeding point is located in front of the Blue Orchid Resort whilst both Ravenala and Club Serena also have excellent house reefs. There are several locations for boat diving but the best is undoubtedly at the nearby Pescador Island....a diving paradise with regular sightings of Whale Sharks, Dolphins and Sea Turtles as well as a myriad of smaller sea creatures."
I removed this from the article because it is an opinion. Jute 01:28, 20 September 2005 (UTC)

message: Tourism Infrastructure and Enterprise Zone Authority (TIEZA) eyes Moalboal as one of the major tourism investment destinations in the province of Cebu. It is one of the assigned urban service centers outside the Metro Cebu according to the Central Visayas Development Plan by the National Economic and Development Authority (NEDA) for the year 2017-2022 and 2023-2028. The partially urbanized downtown area also serves as a commercial center, with some residents from the neighboring towns of southwestern Cebu flock to Moalboal due to numerous business establishments spawning throughout the town.
There are two operating shopping malls in the municipality which are the Gaisano Grand Mall Moalboal and Gaisano Town Center Moalboal, both located in Poblacion East.
The tourist flocked areas of Moalboal such as Basdiot, Tuble and Saavedra have several other business establishments such as hotels, resorts, lodging houses, pension houses, spa, bars, and internationally-inspired restaurants mostly located along the Panagsama road. Rhiane Madarimot (talk) 12:23, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Economy