Talk:Thunderbolt siren

message: I have rewritten this article so it actually makes sense. Removed trivial nonsense, and requesting real photos of the Thunderbolts with minor detail differences (logo, paint job, etc.) ASAP. I have also nominated the article for semi protection against unregistered users, as I'm tired of seeing IP users pop up and ruin the article over and over again. Also, if you're going to edit the article as it is, please ensure you know what's you're talking about before editing it. --JustInn014 (talk) 22:53, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Checked the RfPP page and the request was declined. That said, I have this article on my watchlist and will be looking out for (potentially) non-constructive edits. GB86 08:08, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I see we had at least one IP user spam it. I am surprised the request was declined. On a side note, can you think up any more ways to improve the article? I'm just about out of ideas, aside from more gallery photos. --JustInn014 (talk) 06:44, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Rewriting the article to meet guidelines is a good way to start, such as removing any unnecessary information like information on just the logo or other trivial information, and providing better information backed up by 3rd-party sources. All the IP spammed edits have been removed already and said user has been notified. GB86 02:01, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heavy Rewrite 

message: Perhaps the opening sentence should be phrased "The Thunderbolt siren is a civil defense siren that was once manufactured in the United States by Federal Signal Corporation." After all, it was predominantly employed for civil defense and therefore operated in accordance with the guidelines of FEMA. I seem to recall that is even how it was marketed in the brochures by Federal Signal (altho I will have to check on that point). Just a suggestion. --RKrause (talk) 07:36, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Civil defense highlight 

message: I've removed the trivia chart. If sources can be found showing this is reliable and notable info then some form of the chart can be reinstated.-- — Keithbob • Talk •  23:19, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed chart

message: The various models of this companies sirens have no significant notability and therefore do not deserve a dedicated article.  — Keithbob • Talk •  14:07, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I do not see any independent notability for the siren but it is important information to keep.  A section under the manufacturer is best way to go.  -- GB fan 12:06, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Did you check the previous version, or only the "rewritten" version that JoJoes has been trying to force in?  I can agree that it's borderline at best; just want to make sure you were checking the stable version, not the "new" one.  rdfox 76 (talk) 13:08, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

text: The version does not make any difference, but I have read through both versions.  I do not see any independent notability for this siren.  -- GB fan 17:34, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

text: Since there were no objections, I have merged the contents and changed this to a redirect. -- GB fan 23:40, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Federal Signal Corporation]] 

message: Since the new page has been changed, I have edited the article to make it better. JoJoes123 (talk) 02:59, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-Written