lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Government of Illinois

message: I don't know what the author of this page had in mind, when he said it's modeled on the federal government, with frontier adaptations.  Things that spring to mind are the independently-elected Treasurer, Attorney General and Secretary of State, and an elected judiciary.  If that's what the author meant, maybe the page should say so.  As it stands, the question's sorta left hanging there.  Thanks.  --User:johndodd 20:26, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Constitution

message: Reverted back to 1992. In the United States presidential election, 1988 Illinois voted for Republican George H. W. Bush. --Dual Freq 10:58, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Elections

message: Without citations just about everything is suspect. While things I may know to be true in Illinois are included to someone who is unfamiliar with Illinois politics or history this article would scream of POV, please cleanup appropriately citing reliable sources. If I get the time I shall be bold and do it myself.A mcmurray 18:11, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: POV

message: I just added a sentence about departments.  There needs to be more.Artemis-Arethusa 20:46, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Desperately Needs some Expansion
Talk:Recursive categorical syntax

message: The formalism as presented on the page prior to my edit was not the formalism presented in the works cited by the article. As such, the erroneous information has been removed. If anyone knows where the original information came from, or what framework it was on, it would be good to make a page with that information, but this isn't that page. Augur (talk) 18:27, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  '''''<big>READ THIS</big>''''' 

message: * Need to add explanation of how up and down arrows are used. For example, link grammar only uses two arrow types (left, right), so why are more arrow types needed?
* Provide discussion of relationship to dependency grammar and link grammar. At the current level of this article, I can't tell how these theories differ, or why.
* Correction: I think the correct wikilink is magma (algebra) not groupoid.  In fact, since the thing has identities and division, the correct name for the mathematical structure is quasigroup or loop (algebra), right? The problem here is that the word "groupoid" is applied to a lot of different things; mathematical terminology has changed over the last few decades, and what used to be called groupoids are now more strictly classified as monoids, magmas or quasigroups.
* Downplay the groupoid/magma aspect of the theory ... It would seem to me that  any dependency grammar would be a magma... So what? The thing that makes the theory useful for linguistics is the set of lex orders that are equivalent to the element S (the sentence), right?  Do we get extra benefit from knowing its a magma or quasigroup? (if, for example, it had been a monoid, then the connection to finite state machines would have been extremely significant... but here, I see no such significant correspondence...)
* Use recursion to show that a lexicon can generate an infinite grammar and currying to deal with lexes that take multiple complements. (Why? Isn't this obvious and implicit already, from the mathematical definition?)
Thanks. linas (talk) 16:29, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  ToDo

message: Please don't dumb down this page; it is not too technical. I know nothing about this, yet it's intuitive from the example, how the VP-> cancels with the <-VP, etc.  It resembles a kind of organic chemistry whereby the elements have certain "valences" and "react" with other elements to synthesize molecules. Very neat.
:I agree. Unless someone objects, I am going to wait seven days and then remove the tag. Guy Macon (talk) 08:28, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Removing tag now. Guy Macon (talk) 18:35, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  I am removing this page again. You're apparently not reading the comments I made above: the page contains content that is *not* about Recursive Categorical Syntax but about some other formalism. Augur (talk) 18:50, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments
Talk:American Bottom

message: Did I miss something?  Whence comes this appellation? HuskyHuskie (talk) 00:19, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of name? 

message: I've added an 18th century map. I'm not sure if that's what the requester had in mind, so I am leaving the request for now. Fishal (talk) 15:07, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Map request
Talk:Alton, Illinois

message: I must say, this is probably the first American settlement article I've done ratings for so far that has had actual photographs included. I respect that.
As of what it needs, I could see the Flood of 1993 section embedded somewhere within the History section itself, but in order for it to fit I think the History section needs to be expanded and reorganized. More wikilinks could be added, and citations are definitely necessary, as it only has three. To raise this further up the ladder, I think one doesn't need to put in as much work as in, only a bunch of research, although sections about Culture, Media, and a Parks and Recreation/Sports would be a welcome sight.
I rated this article as Low-importance due in part to its relatively small size. If another important event or disaster affects this town, then this article will meet the criteria for a Mid-importance rating.
--Starstriker7(Say hior see my works) 01:47, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: As of September 6, 2008

message: --Could someone please put the census figures for the city's population on the page in table form?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.223.82.114 (talk) 22:20, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: some of the info I put in. I Live in Alton.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.225.64.155 (talk) 23:49, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:See You at the Pole

message: I see major NPOV issues here.  Reports of how SYATP activities are characterized ought be sourced.  It looks like the editor is expressing his own opinion throught the device of attributing it to authorities unknown. I bet there's even a Wikipedia policy on such content, and how to avoid/correct it.  Someone who knows how maybe ought put an NPOV tag on this -- and remove the stub tag.  This editor has at least remedied its stubbiness.
:Agreed. I've added on independent reference on participation stats...I suspect that there will be a host of citable material in the next few days, and will make it a point to cite and format to maintain NPOV. Akradecki 02:03, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I couldn't find sourcing for the international 2004 participation statement, so I've removed that and added a sourced statement about 2005 participation. Also added additional sourcing, and added a 2006 legal incident and its resolution, along with sourcing. Akradecki 21:07, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

message: I've reworded a statement that had been inserted which said, "Some critics allege that the event is a tool for humiliation of non-Christians." The statement includes a reference to a web article that is critical of SYATP. I have no problem with a critical reference, but no where in the referenced article does it say that SYATP is being used as a tool to humiliate non-believers. In fact, the word humiliate doesn't even occur in the ref article. Thus to insert it into the WP article is to insert the editor's POV. The referenced article, while critical of the practice, does not attempt to include the balance of a statement of the participants as to why they did that, therefore to presume a malicious intent, and to use WP to state that opinion in inappropriate. I have therefore edited the statement so that it still reports that there is criticism to the SYATP practices, but does not stray into presumptious statements. Akradecki 00:12, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "Tool for humiliation"?
Talk:DeKalb, Illinois/Archive 1

message: *The PM section seems a little big.  DeKalb is not defined as a place of police corruption.  Can we trim this section down a little? (The previous unsigned comment was brought to you by the IP 131.156.91.108)
*I agree...  This page seems to have undue weight placed on the PM section.   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:NPOVUW#Undue_weight i guess this qualifies for a Neutral Point of View warning tag--67.175.221.73 07:03, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Police Misconduct 

message: In reality, the whole article could be rewritten, but I've put the cleanup tag instead. The sections are all over the place and should be merged/rewritten/expanded. Emax0 18:26, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: added city infobox, please expand Emax0 19:09, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup
Talk:Elmhurst, Illinois

message: The NY Times seemed to take the geographical rankings with a grain of salt saying "... keep in mind that the rankings partly reflect the locations of large computer servers ... while Elmhurst, Ill. which has gotten attention for doing a lot of "sex" searches appears to represent some of the Western suburbs of Chicago." How to Use Google Trends, By David Leonhardt, July 5, 2006, The New York Times.  --Dual Freq 00:45, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Google Trends

message: Seriously, 67.163.90.107, a gallery of blurry train pictures does not add to this article about Elmhurst. If you disagree then please say why here instead of just reinserting them.--Amalthea (talk) 15:02, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gallery 

message: I once lived in Elmhurst, and I think that we should include a picture of and some information about the Historic York Theater. I once did a Wiki prodject in grade school aabout York Theater, and I think that some info about the city's landmarks would be appropriate. Hieveryone13 (talk) 14:18, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  I once lived here 

message: According to http://www.onlinemba.com/blog/the-stats-on-internet-pornography/, Elmhurst is the US capital of searches for porn. Not sure if its noteworthy enough to include here, but it sure is interesting.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Softlord (talk • contribs) 15:48, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Porn searches 

message: These were added as a "Bibliography" section: --Ronz (talk) 16:22, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Potential refs moved from article
Talk:Kankakee, Illinois

message: i agree this place does lie in a greater chicago region. im trying to figure out how many people live in a 300 mile radius of downtown chicago to see how many people there are this megolopolis region would include detroit. but not winsor,canada and certainly not pittsburgh im trying to figure out for my geo political studies. this place seems to lie about same distance away as kenosha, wisconsin.  99.51.212.6 (talk) 03:38, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:St. Charles, Illinois

message: Large swaths of the history section recently added by User:Northern99 seem to be lifted verbatim from the history pages on www.st-charles.il.us .  It definitely needs to be rewritten to remove this plagiarism.
Note, by the way, that simply adding citations to the place you copied from is not enough.  It's still plagiarism (not to mention a possible copyright violation) to simply copy sentences verbatim from another source if you don't enclose them in quotation marks, even if you cite the source you are plagiarizing.
—Steven G. Johnson (talk) 01:06, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I deleted the article and undeleted the untainted versions. The text in question was added in blocks but not all in one place, and it was difficult to weed out the good from the not-good. I think I've removed all of it; if not, and I missed a spot, simply remove it yourself and leave a good edit summary in explanation. Thanks for reporting it to :WP:CP. KrakatoaKatie 03:28, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violations 

message: Hello,
I am trying to determine approximately how many people in the St. Charles, Geneva and Batavia areas are apartment renters.
Any help is greatly appreciated.
Marie  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Madovin (talk • contribs) 15:07, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renter Population  

message: You really missed the boat by not including the contributions of Col. Baker, who built the Hotel Baker, and his sister who, I believe, built the Arcada Theater (where Burns & Allen performed their last vaudeville act).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kishimojun (talk • contribs) 18:45, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  I can't believe there's no information about Col. Baker and his family's contributions to the town. 
Talk:Cheryl Rubenberg

message: Ian, is she on the board of advisors?  Don't see her name here:  John Z 03:16, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: She may be, but the article does not demonstrate it.  being an adjunct "formerly" is not notable.    Who are her publishers?  Lynne Rienner Publishers  and what is the  Institute of Arab Studies?Historicist (talk) 02:19, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I tend to agree. AfD is the next step. LoverOfTheRussianQueen (talk) 01:56, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable?

message: I no longer am affiliated with the organization Deir Yassin and would like that reference removed. I have edited & published (2010) a 3 vol. Encyclopedia of the Israeli- Palestinian Conflict (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers). This should be added to the biography.----
Thank you. Cheryl Rubenberg (I have no tildes on my computer)
:Those concerns seem to have been addressed in this edit. Do you have any other concerns? (Below the editing box, where it says "Sign your posts on talk pages:", click on the 4 blue tilds and they will appear where the cursor is flashing in your text.) --Anthonyhcole (talk) 00:40, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:   Cheryl Rubenberg 
Talk:Asif Iqbal (Pakistani cricketer)

message: Apologies for my pointless reversion of the last edit. Article needs speedying. ~ Veledan • Talk + new 03:36, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Well spotted Shanel. I didn't even see the article beneath all that vandalism. Time to go to bed *yawn* ~ Veledan • Talk + new 03:59, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  My pointless reversion
Talk:Polish crown jewels

message: This article is almost B-class, the only major problem is the structure. The article has no WP:LEAD to speak off. A proper lead would be all it takes (well, that, and a clarification in the body about Szczerbiec being the last piece). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 16:29, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  B-class failed 
Talk:Pitcairn House

message: I couldn't find any hits in Google to Pitcarin House in Glenrothes whereas there are some references to Pitcairn House (including the External Link I've added), so I changed the name to the latter and renamed the page.  Subsequently I see that Picts says it is "called Pitcarin house by the community".  Apologies if the move was incorrect. -- JimR 03:30, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling of name
Talk:Heavy industry

message: there is very different meaning in the english and german defination of this article. is heavy industry producing big object or is is producing steel, iron etc? --Salvor (talk) 12:01, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed - why does "heavy machinery" redirect here?  Would anyone oppose it redirecting elsewhere, or an article of its own right created?   Morgan Riley (talk) 22:22, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes

message: This was in the firm name section. Turns out it is a internet related company, and kind of missleading, also it's article was deleted as a marketing attempt. Thus I remove it from here.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.17.167.191 (talk) 22:30, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  SUMO Heavy Industries 

message: Since I live in a region that has had lumber, plywood, and flooring industries as a very important part of the economy for many decades, I'm dismayed to find that neither the "Heavy industry" article nor the "Light industry" article would seem to encompass these.  One of the definitions of "heavy industry" is that it's the type that essentially supplies other industries, rather than consumers.  This label should, then, apply to the wood-product industries, because the consumer (e.g., DIY) markets absorb very little output of lumber, plywood, etc.Joel Russ (talk) 22:24, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lumber-type industries: neither "heavy" nor "light"? 

message: how to register my company under heavy industries Act and what is the procedure and docs required 202.149.204.214 (talk) 07:28, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  how to register my company under heavy industries Act and what is the procedure and docs required
Talk:Google data centers

message: Henderson is nowhere near the Tahoe Reno Industrial Center. What gives? Where is the data center? Leijurv (talk) 02:52, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Henderson 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Lennart97 (talk) 13:31, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Google data centers →  – Proper noun Eurohunter (talk) 11:57, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 30 June 2021 

message: A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :Google Modular Data Center is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Google Modular Data Center until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. InfiniteNexus (talk) 04:08, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: ᛝ 103.83.189.115 (talk) 19:17, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomination of [[:Google Modular Data Center]] for deletion
Talk:Göttingen State and University Library

message: I don't know why this is listed as a possible copyright violation since there is no discussion.  But let me give some background.
*I just spent about an hour writing this article using  1) my memory and 2) the GERMAN WIK article on the Goettingen SUB.  At no time during the writing did I consult the possibly violated page.  It's true there is bound to be some overlap, and for the following reasons 1) the important facts are givens, 2) I contributed to the writing of the German article, the translation of which is cited as the possibly violated article, and I was the sole translator of that German article (i.e., I am the author of the possibly violated article) as well as the possibly violating article.  I translated the other article maybe 2 or 3 years ago, and I guess i simply tend to use certain words and grammar (as most people do).  My name is Kim Dammers.  I was employed by the Goe SUB at the time.  The author of the original article (in German) was primarily Dr. Fast, still at the SUB, if some-one deems it necessary to ask him for permission.  (Both the German and the English versions are copyrighted by the SUB, and not by me.) 
*If this article is a violation, then the German Wik is almost certainly MORE so.Kdammers 03:49, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Follow the link provided on the copyvio template . Note that it is only a possible copyvio. If you strongly beleieve that it is not, you can remove it. Thanks. ≈ jossi ≈ 15:41, 25 September 2005 (UTC)

text: I looked at the date of the link (which I wrote but which is SUB copywirtten).  It is later than the date of the booklet on the SUB (which I wrote), which is NOT copywritten.  So I am covered that way as well. Kdammers 03:10, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of franchises

message: The listing for "ABC" could refer to a couple of entities.  Could an editor disambiguate this entry?  Thank you. Courtland 03:49, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: ABC, Inc is a company that sells seamless steel siding, so I put it as ABC seamless steel siding. This is according to source :Franchise 500 dml 14:22, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks. Courtland 14:25, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Ambiguity for "ABC"

message: * Disagree - A franchise and a chain are separate distinct things; whilst franchising maybe de facto in some parts of the world; in others it isn't -- you only have to look at, say Beefeater, Brewers Fayre as examples of large UK chains that do not franchise. -- Ratarsed 17:21, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge in Of [[List of restaurant chains]]
Talk:Fat Wreck Chords

message: Is fat wreck chords really an independent record label? they appear on the RIAA list of members. http://www.riaa.com/about/members/default.asp Jdufresne 04:07, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the word independent for the reason above. Jdufresne 18:53, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't quite understand - why couldn't Fat Wreck Chords be a member of RIAA and still be an independent label? - Quirk 18:53, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Well I suppose it depends how you define Independent. But RIAA represent the conglomerate that is the record industry. If a label is a member of the RIAA they hardly seem independent from it. If they were truly independent then their interests would be much different than the RIAA's and would not want them to represent them. Jdufresne 21:03, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: independent in terms of record labels solely refers to not being an affiliate of the 'big 4', Warner, BMG, Universal and EMI, which combined sell 75% of the music in the world, and 85% of the music in the US. The RIAA opens membership to all labels to help in industry standards. Fat Wreck is owned by Epitaph records, therefor is an independant. AKMask 09:54, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Independent?

message: I have a few problems with this section. Firstly, it doesn't list releases, but bands instead. Second off, I thought Fat Wreck signed bands to one album contracts, so what distinguishes bands that have only ever released one recording with the label? Third, all caps looks suspiscious. Until someone comes up with something addressing these issues I'm reverting. Zytsef (talk) 03:58, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable releases from non-Fat Wreck bands