Talk:These Words

message: Isn't it a bit strange to claim that a song that has "I love you" in its chorus that often (and even in its American title) is "one of the few songs of popular music in recent history to deal with a very sensitive subject that is not about sex or relationships"?! --Fritz Saalfeld 11:03, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The song is not about sex or relationships. "I love you" is the only term in the song that relates to anything in the "romance" area. Also, the lyrics are clearly about writer's block, but "I love you" just happens to be the words Bedingfield comes up with. Otherwise, nothing in this track relates to sex or love. --Winnermario 20:04, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: "not about sex or relationships"?

message: I am happy to report that this is a good article.  Congrats to all the editors.--Esprit15d (talk ¤ contribs) 18:15, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! -- Underneath-it-All 18:16, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Good article

message: Should something be added about the fact that Bedingfield has confused what a romantic poet is in her lyircs?  It is kind of funny. 
Now I think about it something should be added about the entire concept of the song - that notion that saying "I love you" is not worth of writing, it means the most to someone, but to the third person it means nothing.  Disco 06:57, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Addition

message: Each time I insert a paragraph about the mispronunciation of "hyperbole" in the song, and references to the discussion this raised in written media, it is erased. Is this not an interesting/important point?
Thedoctor98 (talk) 03:59, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Hyperbole

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on These Words. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060614163624/http://www.stylusmagazine.com/feature.php?ID=1384 to http://www.stylusmagazine.com/feature.php?ID=1384
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080102172613/http://host17.hrwebservices.net/~atrl/trlarchive/db.html to http://host17.hrwebservices.net/~atrl/trlarchive/db.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090208153620/http://www.vh1.com/shows/dyn/top_40_of_2005/series_countdown.jhtml to http://www.vh1.com/shows/dyn/top_40_of_2005/series_countdown.jhtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:41, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on These Words. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929121032/http://www.musicsquare.net/charts/uk_singles_top_75/2004/35 to http://www.musicsquare.net/charts/uk_singles_top_75/2004/35
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929121906/http://www.musicsquare.net/charts/uk_singles_top_75/2004/36 to http://www.musicsquare.net/charts/uk_singles_top_75/2004/36
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070516022109/http://www.theofficialcharts.com/zoom.php?id=990 to http://www.theofficialcharts.com/zoom.php?id=990
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929111122/http://www.musicsquare.net/charts/song/840 to http://www.musicsquare.net/charts/song/840
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:16, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified