Talk:Dagbladet

message: I'm going to remove the segment stating that "It's is widely known in Norway that Dagbladet is supporting the left side of the political system and is not accepable to be neutral on issues regarding USA" for a variety of reasons:
*The text is not NPOV
*The text is written in rather poor English (if anyone want to reinsert it, please upgrade the language)
*Factually, what it says is wrong. Dagbladet was, until 1977, a part of the Liberal Party, a centre-right or pure centre party. Today, Dagbladet is arguably radical on certain issues (especially regarding culture), and moderate on certain other issues. It is also the only major newspaper in Norway to be completely politically independent. 
Salmon 01:46, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Dagbladet is without doubt a left-wing tabloid newspaper, but today rather in favor of SV, AP than Venstre. If anyone thinks otherwise they're merely socialists in complete denial of reality. -GabaG (talk) 16:56, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

message: "As VG and Dagbladet are the only true national newspapers with substantial readership this has arguably weakened the state of journalism in Norway, as readers cannot rely on a great deal of hard news from these two newspapers"
What about Aftenposten, which has a larger circulation than Dagbladet? Unless someone are able to come up with a good argument why Aftenposten isn't a national newspaper (and cite a source of that in the article), I'll eventually change this. Marstr2 (talk) 23:48, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  True national newspaper? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Dagbladet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130622030526/http://blink.dagbladet.no/index.htm to http://blink.dagbladet.no/index.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160305005104/https://www.jus.no/index.gan?id=29935 to http://www.jus.no/index.gan?id=29935
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:17, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Dagbladet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://www.tns-gallup.no/arch/img.asp?file_id=212417&ext=.pdf
*Added archive https://archive.is/20130703160309/http://www.na24.no/m/propaganda/?articleId=3628156 to http://www.na24.no/m/propaganda/?articleId=3628156
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:08, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: To add to the theme of anti-Israel "historical revisionism", is it appropriate to add that they implied Israel initiated hostilities on Oct 7. They only added that it was in response to Hamas attacks after complaints were submitted. Anyone familiar with the paper knows this wasn't a "mistake".
https://www.ynetnews.com/article/hjk08dov6 120.18.160.112 (talk) 12:08, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Implied Israel started hostilities on Oct 7 2023