lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Amandus Adamson

message: In Works there is an entry "Boats Lost at Sea, Sevastopol, 1904" and in the images below the subsection there is an image labelled "Monument to the Scuttled Ships, Sebastopol, Crimea, 1905". I'm assuming these refer to the same piece and that the phrasing relates to style choices of different translations to English of a name originally in a different language. The question of the date remains though. When I web searched (via Google) sites using "Boats Lost at Sea" had the "1904" date. However, the image's source page has a link to an article using "Monument to the Scuttled Ships" and "1905". I'm wondering if merging via a "/" might be a solution for now, "Monument to the Scuttled Ships/Boats Lost at Sea" & "1904/1905"? Of course if anyone has better more specific information that would be best. Unfortunately my search only turned up brief synopses rather than detailed artist biographies or piece histories. The sites using "Boats Lost at Sea" & "1904" felt like they may all have been derived from a single source. --Kevjonesin (talk) 18:37, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Monument name & date discrepancy
Talk:The Last Children of Schewenborn

message: Die Wolke, too, has an English translation: Fall-Out. (Other books by Pausewang have also been translated into English.) --Kletta 01:36, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The Last Children of Schewenborn was translated into English in the late eighties in both the United Kingdom (1988,1989) and Canada (1988). It was also translated into French, Spanish and Danish. User Calibanu 2.38, 14 November 2022 (UTC) 192.245.185.44 (talk) 01:39, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
Talk:Alternative therapies for developmental and learning disabilities

message: From User:Eubulides' talk page:
The articles: Alternative therapies for developmental and learning disabilities and Autism therapies are too vague and complex how they're separated. The only scientifically-proven therapies are ABA, TEACCH, and PECS (as well as Speech and occupational therapy.) Also Son-Rise is also the least scientifically proven therapy. Why isn't there one article called Early childhood intervention for developmental and learning disabilities, explaining both scientifically-proven and non-scientifically proven approaches? ATC . Talk 23:37, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Also this seems confusing too: List of alternative therapies for developmental and learning disabilities. List of Alternative therapies? Some of them have been mentioned in the other articles too. Why don't we just use one article and merge all the therapies together? ATC . Talk 01:00, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  One article for everything sounds like a big project (and a big article). I'm not familiar with the list article and don't know why it's there. Eubulides (talk) 01:58, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Okay but do you think Son-Rise—very similar to Floortime/DIR—shouldn't be listed in the Autism therapies, as it not scientifically proven, and instead, be listed in the Alternative therapies for developmental and learning disabilities. Additionally, the therapies mentioned in the list article, I will put in my sandbox until I can find ways to include it in the alternative therapies article. And I will put the list article up for proposed deletion. I'm going to add this discussion on the alternative therapies article's talk page. ATC . Talk 02:18, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  I suggest discussing what should be in Autism therapies in that article's talk page, not here. Eubulides (talk) 05:02, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  A bit of confusion 
Talk:Susan Birkenhead

message: WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 10:36, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Still a stub until someone does at least a google search to add easily available info about her.  -- Ssilvers 17:13, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment
Talk:Exit/In

message: Couple of questions. First, how can it be "one of Nashville's original venues for live music" when it opened in 1971? Surely a city of Nashville's history must have had live music well before then. Secondly, who claims that it was the inspiration for Piano Man? The general consensus seems to be that it was inspired by his days in LA. Can anyone provide citations for either of these claims? Iain99 10:41, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As nobody's defended these statements I've removed them. If anyone would like to reinsert them, please could you find some sources to support them. Thanks. Iain99 08:36, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Original venue?

message: The last sentence is incorrect: "In February 2021, the property on Elliston Place where the nightspot sits was sold to a hotel developer, which intends to demolish it in favor of new construction, due to its highly desirable location near VU and Nashville's business district and tourist attractions."
See the historical data at the Davidson County Property Assessor's website, and you will see that the property has not changed hands since 2009. Here is a link to the property card: https://www.padctn.org/prc/property/89826/card/1/historical 2600:1700:5D51:42F0:F060:C128:2D0C:D032 (talk) 19:24, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  {{edit COI|A}}
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Michael Mortimer

message: Hi,
One source of information was from the SinDef flash website, www.sindef.co.uk.
I will be updating the 'Musical Background' section as soon as possible with information sourced from this website and I also contact Michael Mortimer himself via this website for more information about himself which is of course the most reliable too.
He also known for his Freeriding in the South Essex area, in Essex, England, by people who track the sport. I believe this article is a useful bibliographical addition to Wikipedia and should not be removed.
Daves bots 11:03, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:UK deaths in custody

message: This is because a readily availible list is availible from the reference. Please add to this list or expand info with any other deaths. Chendy 11:27, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The above mentioned deletion debate yielded no censensus; but many of the user who wanted to keep the article (including me) admitted that it's focus was too narrow by listing only people of colour - hence the POV tag. -- 790 (talk) 22:16, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Only Black/Ethnic deaths on this list 

message: * fix overlinks, 
* check for incorrect caps, 
* remove any from second list that don't meet "unexplained circumstances surrounding those deaths, allegations of maltreatment, dereliction of duty or brutality", 
* consider compacting to table with columns for  shooting, custody, RTA.   RTA and shooting aren't in custody, so removed.
* Look for other sources. 
* remove "inquest result unknown" 
Rich Farmbrough, 15:14, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: OK great chunks of text were copied from the source which is copyright, therefore I have removed that section.  Note also that the page at IRR is itself  not sourced, and somewhat dated "Last updated: 19 February 2004 The Institute of Race Relations is precluded from expressing a corporate view: any opinions expressed are therefore those of the authors. [...] © Institute of Race Relations"  Rich Farmbrough, 15:24, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This needs a proper overview, mention that all deaths in police custody are subject to inquest (if true?), outline of notable cases, details on what other forms of custody exist. Also be good to link to Home Office figures as well as/instead of those "derived from" Rich Farmbrough, 15:52, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

text: Official reports, when talking of deaths in custody include police pursuits, road traffic accidents, shootings and hospital custody. These official reports are used by the media when they report on deaths in custody. Is Wikipedia going to decide on our own definition (even if we can argue that we are right and everyone else is wrong) and contradict other media? If so, then this should be explained explicitly, so that people reading both other media and Wikipedia can understand why there is a discrepancy in the numbers. QuentinUK (talk) 22:13, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup
Talk:2001 Football League Cup final

message: I would like to point out that there is a small error in the image with the teams' lineups. In addition to appearing on the Birmingham City lineup, goalkeeper Ian Bennett is also on the Liverpool lineup, replacing Sander Westerveld. Could anyone fix it? Lorde McCoy (talk) 14:44, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Little mistake 

message: Bennett is listed as goalkeeper for both teams - please fix asap!!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.111.185.74 (talk) 02:11, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  There is a mistake with the line-up image
Talk:Suzanna Catharina de Graaff

message: Regardless of the truth, this is a fascinating story.
Would it be possible to see a photo of her?
(Google seems to yield nothing.)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.142.101.92 (talk) 23:47, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There are photos of her in the book I found, but I doubt it's legal to scan them in because of the copyright laws. She did bear a strong resemblance to Grand Duchess Tatiana. --Bookworm857158367 04:03, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The picture in the Lovell book I have is fairly close up. Looked similar to Tatiana to me. I guess it depends on what you mean by at a distance. --Bookworm857158367 (talk) 01:46, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Any photos? 

message: An article needs to have a consistent citation style. How is anyone supposed to know that a citation refers to the section above as well when there is no footnote there? As a reader I of this article I do not nessesaraly have acces to the books that are used here so how am I supposed to know where and in what book the information comes from? Entire sections of text can not lack footnotes.*Treker (talk) 21:12, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The source for the information in the article is listed under citations. Bookworm857158367 (talk) 22:10, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: It needs inline citations. Read what I wrote. You or people who have the books may know where exactly the information comes from but other people need footnotes. Like I said. Entire sections of text can not be without it.*Treker (talk) 22:14, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

text: I'm not trying to be polite but the reason I removed all the content earlier is because it wasn't properly cited. After you put it back I instead came here to explain and added citation tags to the article. Adding citation tags isn't unnecessary at all.*Treker (talk) 22:35, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Badly cited
Talk:The Great Controversy

message: I suggest that the two articles The Great Controversy (book) and Great Controversy theme be merged to this page. The theme developed from the book, of course. The article would be about the book, and the subsequent theological development which spawned from it. I saw a similar thing at the article Shepherd's Rod (not that that article is currently any standard to go by). Colin MacLaurin 11:53, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm, I'm not sure that would be best. Shouldn't the book and the doctrine have separate articles? (ideally of course someone should come along and expand both articles) Tonicthebrown 08:23, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I would agree with Tonic. --Maniwar (talk) 22:54, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Add me to the list of those who think that the book is different and distinct from the doctrine.NorthernFalcon 16:16, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK I agree. Merger tags removed. Besides, more content has been added to this article. Colin MacLaurin 13:11, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Hamilton, New South Wales

message: I have removed the sport section as I think it purely unwarranted vandalism or self gratification. It is very un-encyclopedic! Macr237 (talk) 09:43, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sport Section 

message: That's fine do whatever it is that's right for you! Confident468 (talk) 15:42, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sports Section 
Talk:Kings Tableland, New South Wales

message: These two article appears to be about the same place. Kerry (talk) 17:18, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Kings Tableland]]
Talk:Serendip Sanctuary

message: Help Request
Hi there! I am a university student currently working on the Serendip Sanctuary page. As I am only a beginner, could any editors or other users please leave some comments or advice? Thank you Tangentcookie (talk) 05:41, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks great. Hopefully you can sort out the disabiguation links - any probs ping me. Suggest moving a more exciting pic to be the first pic.Chidgk1 (talk) 06:12, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Leura, New South Wales

message: Please add a pronunciation guide.
137.111.13.4 (talk) 10:32, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation
Talk:Yosemite, New South Wales

message: Unlike North Katoomba, Yosemite can be found on a Google map. It seems that both articles describe the same village, so merging North Katoomba to Yosemite is a logical step. Downsize43 (talk)_
:Agree to merge North Katoomba to Yosemite. They refer to the same locality. Yosemite is the official name according to the NSW Geographical Names Board. The name "North Katoomba" is not officially recognised. 電放三葉 (RadioTrefoil) (talk) 09:21, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Klbrain (talk) 17:23, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Public art in Milton Keynes

message: I don't think this stub really warrants a page on it's own but the information would add something to the Milton Keynes article. LookingYourBest 11:56, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tarro, New South Wales

message: A local legend is that Francis Greenway (the convict architect) was buried in Tarro cemetery. A grass fire in about 1975-76 destroyed many grave markers and other details. The remaining cemetery has been significantly vandalized since the 1970s. Quarter sessions road was widened in the late 1970s or early 1980s at the expense of graves on the eastern side of the cemetery.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.49.200.122 (talk) 00:18, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Francis Greenway's Burial
Talk:Warrimoo, New South Wales

message: Here is some information that can be wikified when it's cleaned up and referenced. I don't know of any websites offhand that contain this material, and I don't know what the books were that I originally read the info from. But it is part of our towns histoy.
In 1898 a railway platform named Karabah was built, to service a developing estate possibly sharing the same name. This was closed before WW1. In 1918 a new station was built not much further down the Blue Mountains line, and named Warrimoo. This station was burnt out by a bushfire in the 1950s and subsequently rebuilt.
I know there is an article about the station itself, but I believe this historical information is important to the development of the township itself. 121.44.81.13 (talk) 00:55, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:The Angel of the West Window

message: The book in it's original language can be found at Project Gutenberg Germany
http://gutenberg.spiegel.de/buch/der-engel-vom-westlichen-fenster-1560/1
Suitable for an external link? 124.171.69.103 (talk) 00:42, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to book in original language. (German)
Talk:News media in the European Union

message: This could be interesting, though looking at the US article this could easily turn into a bit of a mess. So on structure, two areas I'd suggest along side, but not dominating, are the monopolisation of media (Berlusconi and Murdoch) and media coverage of European politics. It would be easy for the latter to dominate in this article and for us to talk about member states very other work, perhaps we can talk about media generically without referring to MSs all the time. I also think we could do with a better title, I don't understand why the US one has this style, how about "News media in the European Union"? - J Logan t/c: 12:08, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I agree. - --Ssolbergj 13:19, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Structure
Talk:Night of the Blood Beast

message: Infobox tag has been removed as article already has one.  If you have any problems with this please post a message on my talk page. RWardy 07:47, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox Tag

message: The plot summary makes it sound like the crew find that the "dead" astronaut is awake/alive -- before they find that the doctor is dead.   This is backwards -- they find the dead doctor's body and then seconds later the two women find that the astronaut is awake and moving.   The one woman sees his face and screams.  
The plot summary has the order of events backwards.  Up to this moment they still think the astronaut is dead -- that he has blood pressure and no rigor mortis, but he also has no heartbeat and he is clinically dead/brain dead.   Then they find the doctor...then (and only then) do they find that the "dead" man is walking around/talking.   And then later they do the test to see the embryos in his abdomen.   I just watched the movie.   Chesspride 172.164.16.66 (talk) 05:31, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot Issue 

message: The discussion of Flynn's comparison of "Night of the Blood Beast" 1958 to "The Creeping Terror" 1964 makes it sound like Beast was a cheap knock-off of Terror which is anachronistic. Someone with a copy of Flynn's book ought to review/revise this.--Naaman Brown (talk) 22:21, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  question
Talk:Inter Varsity Dance Competition

message: I am making changes on the basis of the internal documents that I have, which were once on the public website and have since been removed - I have yet to decide the best way of referencing thesePebbles (talk) 21:48, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Are the documents available on archive.org ? Bluap (talk) 00:09, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: I'm trying to find secondary sources to demonstrate notability of both the Inter Varsity Dance Competition and Inter Varsity Dance Association. I'm not sure how far removed from the topic a source has to be to be considered secondary. Most references on the internet are from University dance societies (who are all members of IVDA). There are handful of references outside of the societies on general university websites (http://www.theyorker.co.uk/sport/other-sport/dancesport-ivdc-blackpool-2016/ , https://www.shef.ac.uk/alumni/foundation/report5 for instance). Although they might help with establishing notability, they aren't generally useful as sources for information though. GalaxiaGuy (talk) 17:09, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Kędzierzyn-Koźle

message: ""Recovered Territories"" - Is a Communist-era propaganda term that has no place being used in Wikipedia.  It even fell out of favor with Communists!  It is Newspeak and inherently pushes a POV.Udibi (talk) 11:04, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Recovered Territories
Talk:Rubber duck (military)

message: Looking for an image to use in the article. If you own a rubber duck please consider snapping a photo and uploading it. Thanks. Equazcion 13:02, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: I suggest that anything referenced in this article be moved to Drill purpose rifle then this turned into a redirect to that article. DexDor (talk) 18:57, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge ?
Talk:Gale warning

message: I believe a cone on a pole was used as a visual gale warning in the UK from 1860 to at least the 1930s & possibly mid-20th century. The orientation of the cone indicated the wind direction. I think this would be worth adding to the article, especially if a picture could be found. I'll do a bit more digging, but feel free to preempt me.  Note: there is an Irish Times article that may be a suitable source; not much else online.  D Anthony Patriarche (talk) 16:33, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cone signal
Talk:Prudnik

message: Given that its name in German was Neustadt in Oberschlesien and Polnisch Neustadt (per :pl:Prudnik), was Prudnik ever called Nowe Miasto in Polish? -- Deborahjay (talk) 10:13, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nowe Miasto? 
Talk:Calverton Miners' Welfare F.C.

message: This page has been tagged as not notable as it has not been shown that this football team has competed in the FA Cup which is one of the criteria of Football team notability in England.Delusion23 (talk) 22:26, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: I can't seen anything on the club website, the league sites or anything from the national or county FA that suggests that "Miners'" is correct  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C5:5202:1C00:785D:1C54:66F6:84BD (talk) 20:51, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why does the title of this page have an apostrophe in it?
Talk:Age of Love (TV series)

message: The article states that The last episode aired on August 6, 2007, in which it was revealed that the winner, the 25-year-old Amanda Salinas, will get married to Mark Philippoussis on November 16, 2007, in a televised ceremony but I could find no sources on this. I don't think this is true. -- Kudret abi
:Removed the statement. --Kudret abi 04:32, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  About Mark and Amanda getting married 

message: I think it would be wise to include a spoiler warning, since viewers in new countries might not know who the winner is when looking at this page, such as myself.. 
81.233.8.220 (talk) 19:48, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spoiler warning 
Talk:Analytic subgroup

message: Analytic subgroup is an important mathematical concept in Lie theory. 
One possibility is to add this concept to the article Lie group, but that article is in my opinion already to long.
The main contribution of this (short) article is that it explains an important mathematical concept. If anybody wants to know what an analytic subgroup is, the answer is given in the article!
This article can be expanded with connections to several other Lie group subjects, such as Lie's theorems. Pierreback 12:42, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Problem here: it is not true even for 1-parameter subgroups that Lie subalgebras of dimension one are in bijective correspondence with the 1-parameter analytic subgroups as defined here. The typical 1-parameter subroup of a 2-torus is dense. Charles Matthews 10:07, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: These definitions are taken from Anthony Knapp: Lie groups beyond an introduction, second edition, pages 71-72. He also writes that this definition allows analytic subgroups which are not closed. Perhaps the problem is what definition of regular one uses. This should be included in the article. Pierreback 14:51, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Somerset and Dorset railway before joint ownership

message: This page was properly merged with the "Joint" page, after discussion and considerable thought. 
The reversal of this was contrary to Wikipedia guidelines: 
Merging is a normal editing action, something any editor can do, and as such does not need to be proposed and processed. If you think merging something improves the encyclopedia, you can be bold and perform the merge, as described below. Because of this, it makes little sense to object to a merge purely on procedural grounds, e.g. "you can't do that without discussion" is not a good argument.
(quoted from Help:Merging and moving pages).
The combined page has now been considerably amplified.
Afterbrunel 15:10, 18 July 2007 (UTC)