lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Greektown, Chicago

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians.
I have just made some major edits to this article as a part of my university assignment. This included the introduction of multiple sources, as well as sections including events, strategic plan and cultural sites. It also involved a major overhaul of existing sections.
I am new to using wikipedia, so I may have made some mistakes with my edits. I did, however, put in time and effort into this article and it was written in good faith. 
Please feel free to make any edits to amend any potential mistakes made in my editing process.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hwperrignon (talk • contribs) 02:58, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major edit to article 

message: — Assignment last updated by Mettysh (talk) 01:41, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Rhetorical Practices from the Ancient World to Enlightenment
Talk:Chōshin Chibana

message: The kanji for this gentleman's name would be useful not only for including in the article but for determining the correct spelling of his name, which is surely Choshin not Chosin in any case, as there is no "si" sound in Japanese - is the name ちょうしん (Choushin/Chōshin) or　ちょしん (Choshin)? LordAmeth 09:14, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: According to jawp, ちょうしん (Chōshin) is right. --Nightshadow28 03:47, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Kanji?

message: http://chibanaproject.blogspot.com/  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.22.220.61 (talk) 07:50, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  interesting blog. might be useful 
Talk:Norwood Park Historical District

message: taft is also corrupt junior high school for 7th n 8th graders. The june 12 1996 graduate ls/jl, world cor.chesschamp  g e o c i t i e s.w s/c m b y 2 k to this day is denied proper hs diploma n corrected transcript. He was framed by cps/taft legal team linda k hogan n patrick j rocks and sent tto jail 3x for 28 months by judge from hell william b raines no-brains, lousy prosecutors katherine lech bird n peter guy lisuzzo because ls demanded change of grade to illegal accounting course he was forced to take in the middle of school year. Amazing! High schools should last 5 years so students get better grades and enjoy extracaricular activities thus life itself. 5 years hs must offer jl's basic college degree of 15 paid by state credit hours!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1008:B001:1ACE:5B96:FBBE:6DE:694E (talk) 13:49, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  taft high school drama
Talk:Ukrainian Village, Chicago

message: Its boundaries are Division Street to the north, Kinzie Street to the south, Western Avenue to the west, and Damen Avenue to the east.
:According to this image, the correct southern boundary is Kinzie, not Chicago. I live south of Chicago and there are plenty of Ukrainian Village street banners and most real estate sites I've come across label many addresses south of Chicago and North of Kinzie as Ukrainian Village.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.173.5.96 (talk) 18:45, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Boundary Correction

message: Ask around Chicago and you'll find that Ukrainian Village is the new "hot place" to move in the city for young adults.  It's not too expensive, safe, and popular (at least right now).  If you know of any sources for this online (mine are just word of mouth around the bars) please post em' here for we can add this tidbit to the article.  Thanks! Dann3131 (talk) 19:57, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't know, but within the Ukrainian community I know rents are often advertised in Ukrainian only in order to keep the neighborhood's historical character.  A losing battle? Hope not.  There already IS a Wicker Park.Faustian (talk) 23:37, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: New Hot Spot?
Talk:Louis J. Tullio

message: There is a lot of negative commentary on Mayor Tullio's development policies in this article that have no citations whatsoever, hence my dispute. 24.18.226.4 (talk) 06:00, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality Issue 

message: As a native of Erie who grew up there during the lowest of the low years (and also during Tullio's administration) I know that the city and mayor made lousy decisions. But the previous commenter is correct about whether the article is neutral. While I can attest from memory that those were rotten years, I can find absolutely no verification for claims that Tullio is "one of the worst US mayors in terms of failed urban redevelopment programs" or "Erie being a 'poster child' in urban planning textbooks for failed urban redevelopment schemes." Unless these claims were made in old hardcopy books (which should have been cited anyway), I have been unable to find any evidence whatsoever of these precise claims in particular books among the urban planning profession. I will remove them in reaction to the Neutrality banner that is presently at the top of the article. --DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 19:50, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality Issue
Talk:Gus Alex

message: By 1930, he was suspected in the deaths of at least five unsolved murder cases. Two of the alleged victims, later dying of their injuries in hospital, identified Alex as their assailant as well as three others who were killed after reporting to police extortion and death threats sent by Alex. How is this possible if he is only 14 years old in 1930??????? Somebody needs to fix this
In the 1930"s murders by young teenagers was very common  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.1.71.91 (talk) 00:57, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:China Railway Museum

message: The link to the reference (China Academy of Railway Sciences) gives a Google report "suspected". Please change the link. - Dick Bos (talk) 01:07, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  reference does not work 

message: I think the first picture is the Beijing Railway Museum, located near to Tiananmen Square. Wikispaghetti (talk) 08:20, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Quite true. However, the Beijing Railway Museum has been made a branch of the China Railway Museum in 2010. I have rearranged the pictures. -- Vmenkov (talk) 17:57, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong picture
Talk:Murray Humphreys

message: Any  ideas? Llywelyn2000 (talk) 22:10, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Searching for a Photo of Murray

message: The second paragraph in the section "Mob Career" says "In 1934 Humphreys was jailed by the Federal Government for income tax invasion". Shouldn't that be "income tax evasion"? I did not make any changes since I don't in fact know if he was jailed for income tax evasion, but "income tax invasion" makes no sense to me. Please help! Mateat (talk) 02:59, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well spotted! Llywelyn2000 (talk) 21:29, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Income tax invasion

message: Any ideas?  Llywelyn2000 (talk) 09:01, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Still no photo

message: In this 1937 paper, Emmet Moynihan is listed as Assistant State's attorney.
Google Retrieval of Lawrence Journal-World - Jun 10, 1937
Moynihan was also listed as the Cook County ASA in 1936
Quarter of the way down, page 143
In the FBI FOIA records on Humphrey's, on page 8, under heading 'HUMPHREYS Attorneys', it lists the Hump's attorney as the same Emmet Moynihan. It seems logical to assume that this is the ASA that Hump claimed to have turned back in Capone's days, who worked in Cook County as an ASA, and then becamse his attorney.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Siihb (talk • contribs) 21:02, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  The assistant state's attorney mentioned is likely Emmet Moynihan 

message: As correctly noted in the image details (and in the book from which the photo is sourced), the photo features Humphreys with his wife Jeanne, not his daughter as stated in the caption.2A02:AA1:101F:744:86C:A77C:512B:B95F (talk) 10:14, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo
Talk:Samuzzo Amatuna

message: This page lists 2 dates of death.
98.214.203.153 (talk) 06:46, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuzzo_Amatuna 

message: Better use of citations and references would improve the article by sounding less story like. I think a good example of an article dealing with the article's subject is Anthony Centracchio. Note how within the article about Anthony Centracchio the editors seemed to preface each statement by stating who said it and then used an inline citation do support who did the saying. In this article it sounds as if the editors made all the statements. Pknkly (talk) 15:18, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Story like
Talk:William Daddano Sr.

message: *Per WP:MOS, it is appropriate to bold "Willie Russo", whic was an alias, but not "Willie Potatoes", which was just a nickname. It was not a name that he was known by, except to close friends/colleagues. 
*The "the" in "the Outfit" should only be capitalized when it's at the beginning of a sentence. "The Outfit" wasn't a registered trademark or anything like that. 
*Acronyms, like "aka", are to be spelled out on first use -- see WP:MOS -- because not everyone will know what it means. Many Wikipedia readers are not Americans, and many are reading in their second or third language, so let's make things easier for them. Ground Zero | t 22:21, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean up
Talk:Chicago High School for Agricultural Sciences

message: I tagged the article as not maintaining a neutral point-of-view for the following statement: The school was founded, in part, to increase the number of minorities in agricultural careers, since most of the African-American farmers in the US have been forced out of business by the racist policies of the US Department of Agriculture.
I am unfamiliar with the school, the context, and the USDA policies being referenced, so I encourage someone to clean up this sentence and perhaps the remainder of the article. --Daysleeper47 15:29, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed it since it's defamatory if not justified and the source given does not justify the claim. A cursory search suggests it's not a notable aspect of the school's foundation if anything. JNSQ (talk) 16:14, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV

message: I am giving this article a preliminary assessment of start and mid.  The article is slightly better referenced now, and has an infobox, but still has a long way to go in terms of discussing history and the school's unique curriculum.  I am giving the school a "mid" importance ranking because of the assertion that it is unique (Chicago's last farm) and being one of only a few secondary schools in the United States centered around an agricultural curriculum. LonelyBeacon (talk) 03:19, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:Kenwood Academy

message: Initial searches of Google Books and web indicate two other bearers of the Kenwood Academy name, both located in upstate New York:
*the Kenwood Academy of the Sacred Heart, one of the predecessors of the Doane Stuart School in Albany
*the Kenwood Academy, a private preparatory school that briefly existed in the late 19th century at the Oneida Community Mansion House
Although schools are a context where IMO preemptive disambiguation can make sense, in this case it's difficult to imagine that either of these schools would ever have a proper article (rather than at most a brief section in the respective linked article above), and in any case the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for the name is surely the school in Chicago. -- Visviva (talk) 17:02, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't disagree.  I moved it back here to undo a copy paste move. It has been moved back and forth multiple times in the recent past and it is going to take administrator tools to get it where it should be.John from Idegon (talk) 18:40, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I appreciate these comments.  Why disambiguate when the ambiguity asymptotically approaches zero? Bigturtle (talk) 22:07, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation

message: @BubbaJoe123456, know you've been following this article as well. I see the below bare URL banner on the top of this article, however there does not appear to be any bare URLs visible as part of the article text. Would you recommend removing the banner from the page? (potentially I am not understanding what the banner means if you think the banner should stay)
 Editchecker123 (talk) 05:43, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Editor @Bigturtle sent a thank for this, so I've gone ahead and completed the change by removing the template {Cleanup bare URLs|date=September 2022} Editchecker123 (talk) 07:54, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bare URLs in article banner
Talk:1940 Australian federal election

message: I'm sorry, but wikipedia formatting has gotten so complicated that I have no idea how to reference anything in the proper format. The front page of the Hobart Mercury, which is helpfully archived in full images online, shows that the government formed on 28 October - "Mr Menzies New Federal Government". 
http://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/25830636?browse=ndp%3Abrowse%2Ftitle%2FM%2Ftitle%2F10%2F194%2F1940%2F10%2F28%2Fpage%2F1856011%2Farticle%2F25830636 
I'm surprised that this basic fact wasn't in the article already.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.20.79.244 (talk) 05:15, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source for 28 October edit 

message: These are two different names for the exact same party. Why are they split into two rows on the results table? Bush shep (talk) 13:14, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed after a bit of research. State Labor != Lang Labor. Bush shep (talk) 13:38, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lang Labor and Non-Communist Labor 

message: After all the talk last night, I expected to come here and read about how the 1940 result was a hung parliament.  But not a word.  I'm told the incumbent UAP/CP coalition "narrowly defeated" Labor and continued to hold power with the support of two independents.  Is that a proper characterisation of the outcome?  Seems to me it was a classic hung parliament, and Menzies's side was chosen as the next government because it managed to secure the support of Coles and Wilson.  This doesn't mean that the result was a narow defeat for Labor; all it means is that Labor didn't get a chance to govern, at least not at that time.  Comments?  --  Jack of Oz  ... speak! ...  18:26, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. A hung parliament it was. Frickeg (talk) 23:14, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Ah, some interest at last. :)  Thanks Frickeg.  I've made changes.  --  Jack of Oz  ... speak! ...  23:28, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Hung parliament
Talk:1937 Australian federal election

message: I discovered a count error. 74 seats but the count was 75. I removed the single seat allocated to the independent.
There were no independents elected. See http://elections.uwa.edu.au/listelections.lasso for more details.
--One Salient Oversight (talk) 13:57, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Alexander Wilson is the culprit. He's listed variously in different publications, but in the Parliamentary Handbooks he's an independent and he defeated a sitting Country Party MP so that's what we've always gone with. I've adjusted the numbers accordingly (taking one out of the CP total). Frickeg (talk) 19:41, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The UWA Elections website is not spectacular for historical accuracy on the details - of all the broad sources which annoy me by being cavalier about little things like "which member was this party in", they are one of the worst offenders. I wouldn't even use if as a source if I could avoid it except for something like an election date. The Drover's Wife (talk) 08:32, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: No independents elected

message: There is a discrepancy between the infobox, which records the Coalition increasing its numbers, by one, from 42 to 43; and the results table below which records the Coalition losing four seats to end up with 43. The issue is the Liberal and Country League of South Australia which elected five members in 1934 but whose members are recorded either in the UAP or the Country Party in 1937. I propose to amend the figures to show the LCL members as Coalition members in the 1934-37 Parliament. Refer to Talk:1934 Australian federal election for greater detail. Marplesmustgo (talk) 20:58, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coalition numbers
Talk:1934 Australian federal election

message: Some time ago – I find it was August 2013 – I raised the issue on the talk page for the 1931 federal election that candidates nominated in South Australia in 1931 by Coalition-supporting groups (i.e. the Emergency Committee of South Australia) were recorded as a separate party, but not in the numbers of the Coalition or the UAP.
That has now been fixed for 1931, but the same issue now applies to the 1934 election, where five elected candidates in SA are recorded as Liberal and Country League when they were at the same time Coalition candidates – four UAP, one Country Party.
Their omission from Coalition totals gives a false picture of the situation after the election.
All of these five elected LCL MPs fought the 1937 election: four for the House of Representatives, all in the seats they were occupying; and one for the Senate. In each case, in 1937, those candidates are recorded for the UAP or the Country Party rather than the LCL.
Below is a list of the MPs elected in SA:
Electorate	1931 winner	Party 	1934 winner (1)	Party  	1937 winner    	Party
Adelaide  	Stacey     	EC    	Stacey         	UAP/LCL	Stacey         	UAP
Angas     	Gabb       	EC (2)	Abolished, 1934	       	Abolished, 1934	
Barker    	Cameron M  	EC    	Cameron A      	CP/LCL 	Cameron A      	CP
Boothby   	Price      	EC    	Price          	UAP/LCL	Price          	UAP
Grey      	McBride    	EC    	McBride (3)    	UAP/LCL	Badman         	CP
Hindmarsh 	Makin      	ALP   	Makin          	ALP    	Makin          	ALP
Wakefield 	Hawker (4) 	EC    	Hawker         	UAP/LCL	Hawker         	UAP
*(1) The Wikipedia page for the 1934 federal election labels all five non-UAP MPs as LCL. Psephos Archive has four of them as UAP, and Cameron A as CP. Four of these were re-elected in 1937 (three as UAP, Cameron A as CP), and the fifth, McBride, contested the Senate in 1937 as a UAP candidate. The Wikipedia page for the 1937 federal election labels all these under their respective parties and not as LCL.
*(2) Gabb was elected as an Emergency Candidate candidate but is listed as an Independent, as is well documented in the page on the 1931 federal election.
*(3) McBride contested the Senate in 1937 as a UAP candidate.
*(4) Hawker was a minister in the UAP Government from spring 1932 to autumn 1932, which indicates listing EC members as UAP in 1931 was reasonable.
Further to this, the 1937 election page records in the upper infobox that the Coalition increased its numbers by 1 from 42 to 43, while the detailed Results table lower down the page records the Coalition lost 4 seats to end up with 43. There is an obvious inconsistency here and the issue is the 5 LCL-held seats in SA.
I therefore contend the LCL should be counted with the Coalition on this page, and propose to make amendments accordingly.
Marplesmustgo (talk) 20:51, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed - good catch. Frickeg (talk) 11:58, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Coalition numbers
Talk:North Coast Hiawatha

message: I removed this: "with the last paying passenger, Niel G. "Peter" Peterson who boarded at approximately 6am in Ellensburg, Washington to the King Street Station in downtown Seattle.". I've searched Google News, specifically the Ellensburg Daily Record, and I can't find any mention of it. I'd love to include a detail like that, but we need a reference. Mackensen (talk) 13:23, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last passenger
Talk:1931 Australian federal election

message: Labor-turned-Independent Moses Gabb was simply endorsed by the Emergency Committee of South Australia who did not run their own candidate. However, the Emergency Committee of South Australia article, results at Australian federal election, 1931, and Candidates of the Australian federal election, 1931#South Australia (and probably others I can't think of) treat him implicitly and sometimes explicitly as though he were EC, UAP, or even government. I also particularly take issue with Moses' primary vote being included as UAP in the infobox table which combines the UAP and EC vote to come up with a 41.59% primary vote. What should we do? Timeshift (talk) 07:46, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Gabb has always been a bit of a questionable case here, but it's probably best to just treat him as an independent. Worth double-checking in Trove though just to see how he was described during the campaign. Frickeg (talk) 08:02, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

text: Done. Timeshift (talk) 08:22, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Moses Gabb]] 

message: The second paragraph currently says "To date, no other sitting government at federal level has been defeated after only a single term in office."
This appears to be wrong. Scullin's government is the most recent single-term government, but there have been others. The Fisher ALP government served one term, winning power in 1910 and losing 1913, and the Cook Commonwealth Liberal government served one, 1913-14. And almost all of their predecessors in the 1900s did not serve even one full term (the exception being the Barton/Deakin Protectionist government of 1901-04, serving just over one term).
But I did not want to make the change in case I'm missing some nuance within the claim. I propose the wording "This is currently the most recent sitting government to be defeated after only a single term in office." Axver (talk) 11:54, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems like a good call. The Drover's Wife (talk) 12:12, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Single term government
Talk:Julius Hoffman

message: A temporary subpage at User:Polbot/fjc/Julius Jennings Hoffman was automatically created by a perl script, based on this article at the Biographical Directory of Federal Judges. The subpage should either be merged into this article, or moved and disambiguated. Polbot (talk) 00:01, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Bot-created subpage
Talk:1925 Australian federal election

message: I notice (for the first time even though I entered the data...) that the Country Party won 4 but held 3? How does or how can that work? I confirmed these numbers from the UWA link, it is correct. Looking back at the 1922 results, i'm even more confused. Can anyone else see something i'm not? Timeshift 16:01, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Error with Senate results?
Talk:1922 Australian federal election

message: Since the Coalition wasn't formed until the aftermath of the election, is it wise to show it in the results table? Timrollpickering 13:25, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Almost 4 years since this comment, but I agree. They didn't go to the election as a coalition, so the infobox shouldn't show them as one. Anoldtreeok (talk) 06:01, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not taking a stand either way on this, but interesting parallels to the Queensland state election, 2012... :) Timeshift (talk) 06:30, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm, that is interesting. I wonder what will happen in the end. Anoldtreeok (talk) 13:27, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

text: I agree altering the infobox to remove the coalition, as was not formed till after the election. However I am against altering the resulting Prime Minister to Stanley Bruce, as Hughes was the resulting Prime Minister, Bruce didn't become Prime Minister till almost 3 months after the election.The Tepes (talk) 05:14, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I actually now have to agree with 58.109.94.172 (talk), Stanley Melbourne Bruce is the resulting Prime Minister of this election, even though it was almost 3 months after the election date.The Tepes (talk) 11:27, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Displaying a Coalition result