Talk:J. B. S. Haldane

message: Wikipedia has an entire entry devoted to Haldane's Dilemma. I suggest we insert either a mention, with a link to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haldane%27s_dilemma, or perhaps a suggestion summarizing the dilemma. Thoughts?  [Oops, forgot to sign on Aug 3, 2012] Bob Enyart, Denver radio host at KGOV (talk) 21:26, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Haldane's Dilemma 

message: Haldane emigrated to India in (I believe) 1956.  He took Indian citizenship and described himself as being a Hindu.  He lived there for 8 years, until his death.  However, almost all of his career was spent in Britain (Oxford and London) and virtually all of the work that we are describing occurred there.  I realize that Indians are proud of his move there and his identification with India.  Nevertheless calling him a "British-born Indian geneticist and evolutionary biologist" seems off the mark.  It would be like calling Joseph Priestley a British-born American chemist (his last 10 years being spent in the U.S.) or Albert Einstein a German-born American physicist (as he spent his last 21 years in the U.S.)  Maybe call Haldane a "British, later Indian, geneticist and evolutionary biologist"?  Felsenst (talk) 17:23, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indian or British? 

message: As of 18 July 2009, the Infobox entry for Residence shows a U.S. flag as well as British and Indian ones. Yet nothing in the text mentions any U.S. residence. I think either a time of U.S. residence should be included in the text, or the U.S. flag removed. 09:49, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Residence in infobox 

message: Seeing no section to discuss his political views, I will make this section do for now. Whoever wrote the section on his dissembling on the USSR genetics mess, made it pretty clear that JBSH was intellectually dishonest when dealing with the real nature of Communism, the USSR, Stalin, etc. It seems to me that intellectual dishonesty rarely confines itself to a single subject. Why should a disinterested scholar give ANY credence to what JBSH wrote on ANY subject, rather than assuming it was all contrived or "spun" by him to support some political or social goal? WmMBoyce (talk) 09:57, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps we cannot discount his science because almost all of Haldane's contributions were mathematical arguments, where you can see the logic step by step, and if there is dishonesty it is immediately detectable.  For that reason there are hardly any known cases of scientific fraud in mathematical proofs. Errors, yes, but not fraud. Felsenst (talk) 06:17, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Political views 

message: I have removed the ridiculous assertion that Haldane owned a bordello.  As far as I can see, it is just month-old vandalism that we all failed to notice.  If anyone has a source for this and thinks it is real, let us all know here.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Felsenst (talk • contribs) 20:45, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ridiculous vandalism? 

message: "His father was a scientist, a philosopher and a Liberal, and his mother was a Conservative."
Do we really want that in the article? What do we mean by Liberal and Conservative? 98.198.83.12 (talk) 09:00, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The words "Liberal" and "Conservative" are wikilinked to Liberal Party (UK) and Conservative Party (UK), respectively. So presumably, it means to say that they were supporters, voters or members of said parties. Biographical articles typically being with a brief statement on the subject's background, even if the parents aren't by themselves notable. Gabbe (talk) 11:46, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess that the Liberal gene is dominant in such crosses. ;) WHPratt (talk) 13:59, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I doubt Haldane would relish being called a Liberal. The old Liberal party was no fan of Socialism, much like the present incarnation really... - Pthag (talk) 17:07, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

text: Since Haldane was so politically active, pointing out that his parents supported opposing political parties seems quite relevant. Felsenst (talk) 18:43, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  What...? 

message: I note that Haldane's principle is a redirect to this article.  In the article, the principle is discussed in the section on On Being the Right Size.  Would it be better to redirect to that article?  Obviously, we would also ensure that the principle is discussed in that article, which it currently is not.  Yaris678 (talk) 21:28, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: That note appears to be a mistake, and is being conflated with Haldane principle. I looked up the original citation (Putting science and engineering at the heart of Government policy : eighth report of session 2008–09. Vol. 1. London: The Stationery Office: Great Britain: Parliament: House of Commons: Innovation, Universities, Science and Skills Committee. 2009. p. 40.) It's about Lord Haldane, so I removed the mention. Philosophistry (talk) 16:58, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Haldane's principle 

message: can someone confirm that Haldane received a PhD under Hopkins at Cambridge with an appropriate reference? Encyclopedia Britannica lists an MA in 1914 but after the war he already started as a reader (second in charge of the department) in biochemistry (e.g. Crow JF Genetics 130: 1-6). I can not find a reference to his thesis.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by PTN52 (talk • contribs) 10:33, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: If you look at the "Notes" section of the infobox, it says "Cambridge did not have PhD degrees until 1919. So Haldane obtained an M.A., but then directly worked under Hopkins who was the equivalent of a doctoral mentor." So Britannica is technically right but Wikipedia has chosen to elaborate further.  Maybe it is worth putting an asterisk next to... Actually I think that's what this edit was supposed to be about... but the asterisk should be next to Hopkins, rather than Cambridge... and there should be another one at the start of the notes section.  Yaris678 (talk) 11:46, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

text: I agree that is confusing.  Furthermore, I have found that it was added by a user that has since been blocked.  The info has been there a while before it was challenged.  There may be something in it... or maybe not.  I have tweaked what it says and requested citations.  If you can find any reliable sources on this subject that would be very helpful.  Yaris678 (talk) 13:56, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The MA would have been an Oxford MA. DuncanHill (talk) 15:09, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Haldane's PhD

message: I performed a revert of content that belongs to the talk page and not the article. I've retained a couple of typo/grammar fixes, but removed the rest. I'm not familiar enough to know the correct version for the bits of commentary, so I'm leaving it at the stable version level now. —SpacemanSpiff 14:10, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert 

message: I notice these edits add info about his work on mines... which sounds more like John Scott Haldane.  The cited book is also about JS, rather than JBS.  Yaris678 (talk) 16:25, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  JBS or JS? 

message: Why no reference to his activities as a soviet spy?Royalcourtier (talk) 07:31, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Soviet spy 

message: If Haldane had a "strong opposition towards any form of authoritarianism", why did he support the Soviet Union and Communism? You cannot get more authoritarian than that! And how could "this political dissent" have made him leave England to became a "proud" citizen of India? Britain is the least totalitarian country on earth, and India in 1956 was not dissimilar - though if anything more totalitarian.Royalcourtier (talk)   — Preceding undated comment added 07:35, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reason for move to India 

message: The introductory blurb says that Haldane coined the terms "coupling" and "repulsion." He most certainly did not. Those were coined by William Bateson and explored in his experiments with RC Punnett. See http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK22076/ and,Lindley Darden, Theory Change in Science, 1991 p. 129. Can't figure out how to edit those intro blurbs.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Terraplane34 (talk • contribs) 14:47, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neologisms 

message: Peter Wright in Spycatcher (1987, p. 236) accuses Haldane of passing secrets to the Communist Party of Great Britain during the Second World War. The Party, he says, forwarded those to the GRU of the Soviet Union.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.174.0.229 (talk) 03:11, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes, various authors say so, so I guess it's reliable enough to mention: added and cited. Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:33, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Soviet spy? 

message: On the 300th anniversary in 1949 of Charles I's decapitation, he wrote in the Daily Worker
 "If Charles I had been a geranium, both parts would have lived."
 The source is only my memory, I'm afraid.  Seadowns (talk) 12:20, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Quotations

message: 'a scientific explanation of the air raids that Britain was to endure during the Second World War'
????
Notreallydavid (talk) 08:58, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  the likely effects of. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:18, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Author and visionary 

message: Ronald Fisher is described as British, is there any reason why we don't describe Haldane as British? ♫ RichardWeiss talk contribs 12:41, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Although he was of Scottish descent, and when he served in WWI he did so in a Scottish regiment, he was born and raised in England, and all his work before India was done in England.  At one point when he was asked about his hopes for socialism, he described the prospects for it in "England".  RA Fisher also lived and worked in England and never in Scotland or even Wales.  So he might best be described as English, too. Felsenst (talk) 08:01, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: But why? Britain is a sovereign state, England isn't. What you are saying about Haldane and Scotland makes it more necessary than ever that we call him British, IMO. We don't call Sewall Wright a Bay Stater. I'll see what sources I can find, ♫ RichardWeiss talk contribs 08:36, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Somehow, though, if one is born and raised in Scotland one gets called Scottish, as JBS's uncle Richard is.  If we're going to do that ... Felsenst (talk) 13:45, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: But he was born in England. British solves this problem, English or Scottish just creates problems. ♫ RichardWeiss talk contribs 14:33, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Not sure how this works.  People born in Scotland (and raised there) are usually identified as Scottish.  They too are British.  Felsenst (talk) 21:31, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

text:  By the way, Sewall Wright was not a "Bay stater" even if you consider what state in the U.S. he was from.  Although he was born in Massachusetts, he grew up in Galesburg, Illinois, went to college there, and came back to Illinois for 30 years of his adult life.  His time in the Bay State was very brief. Felsenst (talk) 12:09, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Why English not British?

message: Haldane's sieve needs an article (and at least some indication in the article about J. B. S. Haldane himself what it is). I could probably deal with the latter, but it needs someone more expert to write a stand-alone article. Maybe Felsenst could be persuaded to do this -- I cannot think of anyone better.  Athel cb (talk) 15:44, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added a paragraph to the Haldane article, which anyone more expert than I am is welcome to improve, but I haven't tried to write a stand-alone article.   Athel cb (talk) 16:41, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Haldane's sieve

message: In a somewhat rare case of a Wikipedia entry being examined in some detail in a reliable source, there is this paper. Sadly the authors did not seem to be aware of the possibility of citing specific revisions of Wikipedia and it is hard to see what they are referring to without a careful examination of the article history, hopefully someone can do that. Shyamal (talk) 04:09, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commentary in RS on the Wikipedia article