lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Late string quartets (Beethoven)

message: This article really has a messy title. Does anyone have suggestions for a better one? —  $PЯINGεrαgђ  02:08, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I would at least take away the opus numbers, since very rarely articles about classical compositions have the opus number in their titles. I'm not sure about the proper English way of putting the hyphen/dash between two numbers when meaning the span from A to B, but I'd use the proper one in the title for the span from 12 to 16. Also, the word "Grosse" has a double-s, which should be ß instead (at least the article about Große Fuge alone has the character). --Gwaur (Spokening) 00:20, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The title of the article can't contain a non-English letter, I don't think (?), and double-S is acceptable and correct in German just like adding an e instead of an umlaut is acceptable and correct. That said, if we're looking for a handier title, the group is usually simply called "Beethoven's Late String Quartets" so we could go with "Late String Quartets (Beethoven)". Softlavender (talk) 10:03, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This article is pointless. There is much more detail on the pages for the individual quartets; there is a list with links at List_of_works_by_Beethoven#String_quartets. Silly unnecessary poorly-written article ought to be deleted.119.142.152.48 (talk) 09:50, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Messy title

message: Shouldn't the title be "Late string quartets (Beethoven)"? What is the standard in academic literature in this area? Toccata quarta (talk) 06:52, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:Maung Aye

message: Anyone have information about training Maung Aye allegedly got in CIA ? There was a post at reg.burma about it.  Serg3d2 22:14, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Alleged Maung Aye CIA connection
Talk:PAREF Southridge School

message: I do not see why there is a necessary use of a template called "Infobox Philippine High School" when "Infobox Secondary School" has been around as an available standard that is more widely used. The Philippine High School infobox template is incomplete, and is really just redundancy which serves no practical purpose. The Secondary School infobox can be used with proper adjustment to labels and information. Rmcsamson 06:59, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This article is using the ISS at present. -- Mithril Cloud 07:06, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox 

message: It is erroneous to say that Southridge entrusts its religious instruction to the priests of Opus Dei. As a matter of fact, as far as I know, Southridge does not even have priests as teachers, not even for their Religion classes. Southridge identifies itself as a private non-sectarian school. What I know is that the requirement is that Religion teachers have to be part of Opus Dei, but they don't have to be priests. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.138.180.33 (talk) 15:50, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Education
Talk:OESB-FS

message: This is only the skeleton af an article about a federation of chess. I will send the link to the federation director , so he may develop the article. It should be about the history of the federation and all the other headlines that are written already.
The list of names is the Grand Masters of chess , and Senior chess masters and International masters , all of them top players that are worthy of an entry in the wikipedia. All of them created masterpieces of chess!  YoavD 07:00, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, but this applies only to Correspondence chess, not to chess in general, or to the Austrian Chess Federation :de:Österreichischer Schachbund. Compare also to :de:Liste österreichischer Schachspieler at de-Wiki. -- Matthead  Discuß   14:22, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:ICCF Belarus

message: This is only the skeleton af an article about a federation of chess. I will send the link to the federation director , so he may develop the article. It should be about the history of the federation and all the other headlines that are written already.
The list of names is the Grand Masters of chess , and Senior chess masters and International masters , all of them top players that are worthy of an entry in the wikipedia. All of them created masterpieces of chess!  YoavD 07:02, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I just removed all of the sections that were empty. If you have content for those sections, feel free to recreate them, but in the mean time it doesn't seem necessary to have them. AWeenieMan (talk) 22:57, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:World Golf Championships

message: According to the Official World Golf Rankings article, "The winners of the three individual events in the World Golf Championships series generally receive 70 to 78 points ... before 2007 the official points allocations were half these levels, and they were initially doubled up to calculate weighted points. For example a major championship win carried 50 points for the winner, which was initially given a weighting of two, so the adjusted points tally was 100. This system, which was confusing and had no apparent advantages, was abandoned in mid 2007". 
In the light of this, I have updated this article to reflect current practice.
Regards to all, John Moore 309 14:33, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ranking points awarded

message: Year	Championship	Match Play	Invitational	Champions
2023	–           	52.41     	–           	
2022	–           	74        	–           	Canceled
2021	74          	76        	74          	Canceled
2020	70          	Canceled  	76          	Canceled
2019	72          	76        	72          	60
2018	72          	74        	74          	66
2017	76          	74        	76          	64
2016	76          	76        	68          	70
2015	76          	76        	74          	66
2014	76          	72        	76          	68
2013	74          	74        	76          	66
2012	78          	76        	76          	64
2011	74          	76        	76          	62
2010	74          	74        	76          	68
2009	78          	76        	76          	66
2008	76          	76        	74          	(52)
2007	76          	76        	76          	(52)
2006	70          	76        	76          	(52)
2005	72          	76        	74          	(48)
2004	70          	74        	76          	–
2003	76          	76        	78          	–
2002	76          	76        	76          	–
2001	Canceled    	58        	68          	–
2000	66          	76        	64          	–
1999	70          	76        	68          	–
OWGR points awarded for each tournament. Tewapack (talk) 23:01, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: OWGR points table
Talk:Chris Parson

message: It's comedic abortions like "Chris" "Parson" that make me think the world would be a better place under fascism.
No, it's not that fascism is good. It's that "Chris" "Parson" is that bad.
PeteJayhawk (talk) 05:52, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Zohnerism

message: Does anyone have sources for this not being a non-notable neologism? The DHMO hoax was certainly notable, but is the term "Zohnerism" used enough to be notable? --Icarus (Hi!) 07:14, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: 414 google hits, including here, Yahoo answers, urban dictionary etc. I'll stick a merge tag on. Totnesmartin 19:33, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Most of those come out of the wikipedia article, though. Merge is good. - DavidWBrooks 12:58, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable or neologism?
Talk:Karl Leister

message: Hold your horses wikiofficer Jimfbleak: anyone who knows anything about classical music knows the basic biographical facts of Karl Leister; he is one of the most famous classical musicians in the World. Just searh any page or CD booklet on Leister you will find the basic information there. Given that this is a stub, if it is extended with more comprehensive detailing of his career and work; then I guess sources would be required. I was just surprised that there was no entry in English wikipedia for Karl Leister! 
Try to control your horses Jimfbleak or the only people that will end up contributing to wikipedia will be fans of Britney Spears (or is it Speers?)or Paris Hilton.
Montpierre en 07:15, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: JIMFBLEAK
Talk:SWISH-E

message: I would be happy to point future editors to verifiable sources of information to fill out this stub.  David L Norris (talk) 06:30, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

message: I mean http://swish-e.org/ Does this mean that the software is no longer available? Thanks for having a look on it --93.220.26.28 (talk) 12:20, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Website is down? 
Talk:Mad River (Ohio)

message: I've heard it's called that because of a crazy course. Can we have a source for the name? Nyttend 05:17, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Mad" name? 
Category talk:Towns in Western Australia

message: Are aboriginal communities classified as towns as well as indigenous communities? Fancyfootwork 07:36, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Towns and bounded localities are treated the same way. Assuming that the communities you have in mind are gazetted localities (i.e. they are listed in the Gazetteer of Australia ), then they should be treated as per towns. Hesperian 10:18, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What if according to this website the community is classified as unbounded? Are unbounded localities registered in wiki the same way? Fancyfootwork 12:27, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: For unbounded localities we usually use the geographic convention. If the name doesn't conflict with some other article title, then just use Place name; if that conflicts with another article, then use Place name (Western Australia). Want to tell me the name of the community? Hesperian 12:35, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: So if the gazetteer of australia lists a community as looma community or kadjina community and not simply looma or kadjina then the wiki article should reflect this?Fancyfootwork 11:46, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, Kadjina Community is its official gazetted name, so that should be the name of the article. Hesperian 11:49, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Why have all the towns in the towns of WA list used TownName, (Western Australia) convention even when they dont conflict?Fancyfootwork 11:51, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Because that is the convention that was adopted after extensive discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Australian places. I don't like it either. Hesperian 11:56, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2006 comment
Talk:History of the Jews in Kazakhstan

message: This page is going to see a lot of vandalism because of Borat, so I think we should semi-protect it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sahmeditor (talk • contribs) 05:39, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protection 

message: As above, the article should be renamed to properly reflect that the subject matter is the whole Jewish community located in Kazakhstan, rather than ethnic Kazakhs who are Jewish. The renaming would be consistent with Jews in Ukraine not "Ukrainian Jews" or British Jews, not "English Jews".Konchevnik81 (talk) 13:33, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Move to Jews in Kazakhstan

message: should me be mentioned  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.246.66.76 (talk) 23:26, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  borat  

message: I just did some basic maths and took out a zero -AnCeallach  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.97.254.150 (talk) 20:23, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  10'000 jews 
Talk:List of medical roots, suffixes and prefixes

message: List defines "neo-" as "new" - I thing "young" would be better, as nova means new.( As in Novascotia.)81.141.26.118 (talk) 14:55, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I understand that it is possible to make the lists sortable in every column. This would be helpful, but I haven't the time to figure out how to do it right now. Boleroinferno (talk) 18:07, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Sortable lists

message: Ptero- also means "wing" (i.e., besides pterygo-), but does that apply to medical language? Cbsteffen (talk) 16:11, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question About a Word Root 

message: The title is longer than it needs to be. We could simplify it by naming it "List of medical roots and affixes." Lilglocky (talk) 19:37, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title Revision
Talk:Disclaimer (patent)

message: Uh no discussion of negative claim limitations in US patents? 69.143.7.154 07:55, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for your suggestion! When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes.  Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the  link at the top. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to).  The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes — they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills.  New contributors are always welcome. --Edcolins 12:06, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Lynn Benfield

message: I've removed the sentence "There is a very vague sense that she may be attracted to Alan", as I feel that it's (a) quite POV (though I understand how many could see it that way, and (b) wrong. Despite what I said before, I don't believe she feels that way at all. It's purely professional.
Gardener of Geda 07:56, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 07:51, December 26, 2006 rewrite
Talk:Tehran Monorail

message: This article needs correction.
It states, incorrectly, that "the first monorail was innagurated on March 17 2004," and that "At present no services are provided on the line and it is effectively shut down."
The Teheran Monorail line does not in fact exist. The "inauguration" on March 17, 2004 refers to the start of the project to build it (see http://www.iran-daily.com/1383/2100/html/focus.htm ). Ldemery 08:03, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Monorail project, not a completed monorail
Talk:Tuner (radio)

message: i can do the research.Mashedpotatoes52 02:15 PM, 29 January 2021 (talk)  — Preceding undated comment added 20:16, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: What needs to be added?

message: I created the section for gangs and filters, please help me include some information on these as I'm fairly new to the tuner world and most of the tuners listed on fmtunerinfo.com were made in the decade before I was borned. Your wisdom (you know who you are!) are needed! =) Dept of Alchemy 08:05, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gangs and Filters 

message: I suggest that this article (alongside Tuner (television)) be merged to Tuner (electronics). - Fanatix 06:45, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge? 

message: This article seems to be the best one the merge the stub Tuner (electronics) and the narrow Tuner (television) into.  Yes?  Dicklyon (talk) 03:50, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge from [[Tuner (electronics)]] and [[Tuner (television)]]

message: There is no such thing as a digital "tuner".  Digital is a modulation scheme that is applied to a frequency.  You "tune" to a frequency, and demodulate the encoding AM/FM/Digital, etc.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.47.126.236 (talk) 17:33, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Digital Tuners - A Misnomer
Talk:1934 in LGBT rights

message: Is "gay rights" the right term to use ???  Is it fair to describe female homosexuals as being gay ???  Are you using the word "gay" to refer only to men, or to the homosexual community in general ??? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Raindreamer (talk • contribs).
:Technically, you're right - all of the List of years in gay rights should be renamed to "XXXX in LGBT rights". -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 18:51, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:Randori

message: After reading this very good description I would like to add that in ASU (Aikido Schools of Ueshiba) Randori is actively encouraged from day one ,this may vary slightly from dojo to dojo, but generally in ASU students are never excluded from any activity, in the dojo I attended Randori is encouraged participation from day one. And from my own experiences of ASU nothing is ever limited to advanced students. Randori is a very valuable lesson for everyone because it encourages balance, agility, perception and many other high quality attributes. I feel any Aikido student regardless of their experience shoudl actively participate in Randori, simply because its a group or team excercise and encourages fun as well as learning.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.136.186.16 (talk) 23:28, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Randori 

message: I'm planning to merge these sections. The term is "used in Japanese martial arts" and its meaning "depends on the martial art" so it doesn't make sense to title a section "In Japan" when the content of that section refers to usage in Japan in one organization in one art. Also, it's not noteworthy to note small differences in randori practice in one small subsidiary of an organization when variations that large and larger can occur from dojo to dojo in the same organization. Flj529 (talk) 04:55, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging sections "In Japan" and "Tenshin Aikido", renaming to "In Aikido"
Talk:Alarm indication signal

message: This material does not seem to belong in this article. The subject of this article is "Alarm Indication Signal", so it is inapproprite to add off-topic material in the body of the article. Since there appear to be two definitions for AIS-P, perhaps an article for "Automatic Independent Surveillance-Privacy" should be created, and a disambiguation page should be used to direct the reader to the appropriate article. PhilosopherBruce 08:14, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Automatic Independent Surveillance - Privacy (AIS-P)

message: This sentence: "At the DS3 signal level, the intermediate element receiving an errored signal replaces the errored channel data with a signal consisting of valid DS-3 frame with the overhead bits (the M-subframe alignments bits, M-frame alignment bits, and P bits) [*] with the payload set to a 1010... sequence, the C bits all set to zero, and the X bits set to one." is incomplete. After the parenthetical explaining "overhead bits" there should be words saying what happens to these bits, but they are missing. I've marked this spot with [*] above. - Dougher (talk) 19:49, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad sentence
Talk:Buku Harian Nayla

message: not only this serial..
raam (the satan) punjabi has published these:
Bintang based from Putri Huan Zhu
Impian Cinderella based from Frog Prince
Cincin based from Beautiful Days
Cinta 100 Hari based from My Crazy Love
Siapa Takut Jatuh Cinta based from Meteor Garden
Demi Cinta based from Love
Ciuman Pertama based from Itazura na Kiss
Atas Nama Cinta based from Stairway to Heaven
Penyihir Cinta based from Magician Love
I Love You, Boss based from Bright Girl’s Success Story
Pengantin Remaja based from My Little Bride
Benci Jadi Cinta based from My Girl
Janji Jaya based from My name is Kim Sam Soon
Benci bilang cinta based from Princess Hours
Liontin based from Glass Shoes
Katakan Kau Mencintaiku based from Sad Love Song
Well, if I am not wrong, 'Penyihir Cinta' is actually get the license. --Calupict! 02:42, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: And then?
Will it kill you if he plagiarizes all the time?
If the answer is YES, i hope it won't take too much time.
KOMENTAR LU GAK PENTING BANGET GITU LOH. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 61.94.120.173 (talk) 17:34, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  So what gitu loh? 

message: this article seems to be offending too much to the serial. The sentences, such as
This drama completely plagiarizes a Japanese drama 1 Litre of Tears
or The drama allegedly plagiarizes a Japanese television drama titled 1 Litre of Tears
is too offensive and i considered these sentences as not neutral.
so is it wrong that i've erased them? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 61.94.120.173 (talk) 17:37, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Betul2 

message: I add Television Series Box which I copied from Buffy. I also add the cast list and remove the RCTI link because the link is broken one.--Calupict! 01:13, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The updates 
Talk:Varnish (software)

message: A category should be created for http accelerators or whatever is most appropriate, which should probably include at least squid as one of the main rivals, but I'm not precise on the proxy / reverse proxy / accelerator distinction yet, so I left this for another time. MaxEnt 08:22, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]]

message: I've never used the product and came here trying to find info on it. I am sadly unimpressed that this article reads like a marketing brochure. 
How about real-world comparisons with alternatives?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.255.171.141 (talk) 15:34, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good idea if you cand find reliable source of that comparison. I might make it, but I will not be reliable source by the means of Wikipedia and it'll be OR 194.30.179.66 (talk) 11:19, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

text: It absolutely does read like marketing.  'Not more than others' is not a justification.  (Imagine telling a cop 'he was breaking the law too' when you're stopped for a crime!)  It also has individual commands listed, which is highly inappropriate.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.155.120.34 (talk) 08:38, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reads like pro-product marketing drivel 

message: Is "http accelerator" the same thing as "reverse proxy" ? Fresheneesz (talk) 05:13, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: A little late, but yes, it's the same thing in this context. Though there are "http accelerators" that try to do more fancy/protocol-breaking things. Personally, I prefer the "reverse proxy" term as it's more descriptive. 87.238.43.248 (talk) 18:08, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  That previous comment would be me. KristianLyngstol (talk) 18:11, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

text: The correct term is “HTTP surrogate”.  DES (talk) 01:34, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question 

message: I've removed some marketing phrases about this product from here and other places. Jeblad (talk) 11:13, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed text 

message: The statement "Currently, the rights to the code are jointly held by Verdens Gang and Linpro." is very troublesome. If the code is released by a BSD license there is no rights left except the rights given through the Norwegian law on authorship given in Åndsverksloven. Previously it is said that it is licensed through a dual license scheme, and then some rights may be held for the additional code. Jeblad (talk) 11:17, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The rights are still held by the entity holding the copyright, even with a BSD license. While the BSD license places very few restrictions on the use of the work, it is still a license. That being said, it's probably better to just state that "the copyright is held by ..." instead, which is more precise. KristianLyngstol (talk) 21:54, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Rights to the code"