lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Chgrp

message: chgrp group target1 [target2 ..]
The target parameters indicate the files or directories for which the change should not be made.
I am assuming that target2 would be the one that should not have the changes made. Anyone want to confirm this?
:Both are files/dirs that should have the change made. Target2 is optional. This is the corrected text - 
:*The target1 parameter indicates the files or directories for which the change should be made. 
:*The target2 parameter indicates optional additional files or directories for which the change should be made. 
:--Unixguy 15:02, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Minor point of Confusion

message: it seems that schgrp is used by some ftp servers too,  --192.116.17.51 12:01, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  chgrp in ftp 

message: I'm not convinced that a single Unix command should have an article dedicated to that specific command as opposed to an article that lists, as one example, the "most useful" commands. PonceDeLePwn (talk) 23:06, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is This Topic "Notable" Enough, or Otherwise Warranting Its Own Article?
Talk:Albrecht von Hagen

message: Appologies if I'm doing this incorrectly, being my first attempt to actually become involved with Wikipedia.
Just wanted to point out what I believe to be a mistake, the article states "In May 1944, Hagen, together with Joachim Kuhn, arranged for the explosive that was to be used in the attempt on Hitler's life."
The problem, I believe, is that according to Joachim Kuhn's wikipedia entry, he would have been about 2 months old at the time he allegedly participated in Hitler's assassination.  
Thanks.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by PaynefullyDane (talk • contribs) 22:18, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in Reference to Co-conspiritor for Hitler's Assassination Attempt 
Talk:Protein production

message: why are there no references in this article?--128.227.99.51 23:23, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References?

message: Should this article be deleted and merged/redirected to gene expression? Pdcook (talk) 19:35, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger with Gene Expression?

message: I'm here to nitpick again about this article again. And like before this might have to do with each field's interpretation of protein expression, but the line "It consists of the stages after DNA has been translated into polypeptide chains..." might not meet everyone's definition. Can not the process of translation itself be considered a part of protein expression? If it can, then the definition above excludes it. I think we could use a more generic definition. Ideas? Pdcook (talk) 16:39, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'm back again 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Over expression and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 5#Over expression until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.   Jay (talk) 07:27, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Over expression" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Secretory protein

message: Examine the model of the secretion of a protein into the environment surrounding a cell. Identify and organize the organelles involved in the process, from protein synthesis through secretion.
Responses 2601:CC:4300:87E0:E170:25A:9DEA:D366 (talk) 23:50, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  the molecular and cell biology task force
Talk:Coaster Works

message: This page has been vandalized 210.50.228.4 (talk) 06:55, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:CyberJudas

message: I hope nobody minds, but having wandered onto this page while looking at political games, I've taken the liberty of tidying it up a little and padding out the description a little.
I wasn't really sure what to do with the link to Home of the Underdogs at the bottom.  My first instinct was to remove it - abandonware isn't public domain software.  But on the other hand, it's never been determined to be strictly illegal either, as far as I know, and I know that there are some publishers who're happy to let their old games go.  So it seemed excessive to remove it on legal grounds.  But I have added a note under the link which I hope (Not Being A Lawyer) would cover Wikipedia in the event anybody follows it and proceeds to download copyrighted software for free.
Please feel free to revert any or all of my changes if they're not appropriate.  Thanks - Coldwind139 (talk) 09:15, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reworked Article
Talk:Protein sequencer

message: Given the many problems tagged to this page and the existence of a perfectly good article in Protein sequencing, wouldn't the best solution be to merge/redirect this to that page? Lostraven (talk) 02:08, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: . I agree, Lostraven, so I merged all the text to Protein sequencing and made this Protein sequencer article a redirect to Protein sequencing#Protein sequencer. --DavidCary (talk) 16:57, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging to Protein sequencing
Talk:Protein splicing

message: Merging Intein into here sounds like a good idea, given that inteins are only produced as part of protein splicing, and the protein splicing page is under-developed, hence benefitting from the new content. It would also give more context to the Intein content. Klbrain (talk) 13:22, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 07:34, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Tony Clavier

message: There is no point in adding contentious BLP content in this article unless it strictly adheres to the BLP policies.  Such content will be removed. One of these policies is that any unreferenced or poorly referenced coments about contentious BLP issues must be removed immediately and without discussion.  Vague so-called "references" to photocopies of documents which someone claims exists are obviously not acceptable in any article as any kind of reference - but especially when they claim to support contentious BLP issues.  I will try to bring this article to the BLP noticeboard for the attention of more expert editors and administrators. Anglicanus (talk) 10:23, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The editor who is adding the material already started a discussion there , which they haven't returned to. I agree, this material must be sourced properly by BLP, otherwise it will be removed. Dayewalker (talk) 15:49, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  BLP policy problems
Talk:Flavo Protein

message: This article doesn't say much about the protein itself, it mainly talks about aerobic respiration and ATP synthesis which is already covered elsewhere. Therefore, I'm proposing to merge the content of this page with oxidative phosphorylation (if it is not already covered by that article) and redirect this page to flavoprotein. - tameeria 03:25, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  proposed merge
Talk:Serena Waldman

message: Needed rewriting for tone. I fixed it, but sources are still needed for this article. --Lendorien 20:35, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup
Talk:Lattice protein

message: I have been planning some additions and modifications to this page and plan on uploading them here soon. I plan on adding a section on lattices as well as more depth on the hydrophobic-polar model as that is one of the primary methods used. For more information, refer to my talk page. Emandems1 (talk) 21:29, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Protein filament

message: I would propose to merge this feeble article with cytoskeleton. TheBartgry (talk) 21:32, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: — Assignment last updated by Kgenn001 (talk) 03:54, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Bio 401 Cell Biology with lab F2022

message: I will be adding information to this article for a course assignment under the supervision of Dr. Lesley Temesvari (Username: LTMSEV) at Clemson University.  Mccrada (talk) 10:01, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Improvement: Cell Biology 4610
Talk:Microprocessor complex subunit DGCR8

message: Hi I'm a third year genetics major and I plan to edit this page as part of a project for AdGen (advanced genetics) at UWO. I plan on adding more information about the DGCR8 gene its self. For instance the location, structure, function, and regulation of the DGCR8. Additionally I plan to the already existing information provided on the DGCR8 protein, how its regulated, and its role in the Drosha-DGCR8 microprocessor complex and what function the complex preforms and why its important. I also intend to add a section on diseases and disorders associated with DGCR8. This will predominately focus on Digeorge syndrome and the 22q11.2 deletion, a region of the genome where DGCR8 is located, and its role in schizophrenia. --Bratz2 (talk) 15:13, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:M2 proton channel

message: I propose that this page be merged with Influenza virus matrix protein 2.  It appears to be a duplicate.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danmend3 (talk • contribs) 00:15, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: I thought that the M2 proton channel was a tetramer.http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v451/n7178/abs/nature06531.html  At the beginning of the structure page shouldn't it say 4 proteins not 3? Ovorp (talk) 03:27, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  M2 structure 

message: The "Transport Reaction" section likely needs a citation, correct? --Djinn32 (talk) 00:30, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transport Reaction
Talk:Strabismus (protein)

message: I just isolated an allele of vangl2 in the zebrafish and could make a picture of its phenotype. Who thinks its a good contribution to this article should give me a quick feedback. 
Cheers, Ned  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.124.26.250 (talk) 09:31, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Fern Pass

message: This article perfectly illustrates the perils of part-translating Germanic place names into English. By changing Fernpass to Fern Pass we have constructed an apparantly English name that almost any native English speaker would erroneously assume was derived from the Fern or Pteridophyta botanical family.
We should either leave well alone (eg. Fernpass) or translate properly (Remote Pass or Far Pass?). My choice would be 'Fernpass', but that would not be consistent with the naming of all the other Germanic passes. Also I suspect I'm in a minority in not believing in translating German language proper nouns when naming articles. So what to do?. -- chris_j_wood (talk) 10:52, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:Heterochromatin protein 1

message: "HP1 was originally discovered by Yani Zhou in 1986 as an important factor in the phenomenon known as position effect variegation in Drosophila melanogaster" 
I am not aware of this contribution. 
T. C. James--Jthrppel (talk) 11:19, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Note that HP1 was originally discovered based on a cytological assay.  TC James prepared monoclonal antibodies against proteins tightly bound in the nuclei of Drosophila melanogaster embryos, and used these to stain the polytene chromosomes from third instar larvae.  An antibody that showed high concentration in the chromocenter/pericentric heterochromatin, specific to a single nuclear protein by Western blot, was used to screen an expression library, recovering a cDNA clone.  This enabled both a preliminary  determination of the amino acid sequence and identification of the genetic locus as 29A on the second chromosome (James and Elgin, 1986). Both Thomas Grigliatti (University of British Columbia) and Guntur Reuter (Halle University, Germany) had previously identified Suppressor of Variegation mutants in this region, and kindly supplied the mutant lines.  Sequencing of a mutant line from Grigliatti showed that a mutation in the gene for HP1 indeed led to a loss of heterochromatin silencing, indicating the functional role of HP1 (Eissenberg et al. 1990, Proc Natl Acad Science USA 87, pp. 9923-27).Carlisle1953 (talk) 21:56, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit discovery of HP1
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Futurama DVD commentaries

message: *Amazing how mine got deleted, but The Simpsons one didn't ... Jigsy 20:19, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have nominated it for deletion, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Simpsons DVD commentaries. --WillMak050389 21:07, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Ljubljana Castle

message: What mineral does the Castle Hill consist of? 89.178.110.15 (talk) 17:35, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Castle Hill 
Talk:Porin (protein)

message: Many, perhaps most, porins form non-specific channels across the outer membrane.  Any molecule small enough to pass through the channel can move through the porin by passive diffusion.  A recent reference is:  Kojima S, Nikaido H.Permeation rates of penicillins indicate that Escherichia coli porins function principally as nonspecific channels. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jul 9;110(28):E2629-34. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1310333110. Epub 2013 Jun 24. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23798411 Siegele (talk) 04:31, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Rounders (1914 film)

message: This movie has been described as "Laurel and Hardy on acid" (although it predates Laurel and Hardy, of course). Much as I love Stan and Ollie, and believe me I really really do, this is a finer team of comedians who were even more talented (by far) than Laurel or Hardy.  Watch it on Hulu.com.  Upsmiler (talk) 01:38, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Shaukat Hayat Khan

message: Dear all, many salams. I have added to this stub and tried to organize it up to a basic Wiki standard-- will need more work as we go along. I have also removed the 'more references/citations' tag as have added verifiable references as per Wiki verifiability reqs. Best wishes
Khani100 (talk) 07:00, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Amendments

message: I have uploaded an image for Shaukat Hayat Khan, c 1942, on Wikipedia but cant seem to add this properly to the page. There were some 'objections' to the copyright status of the image but have clarified/removed these objections. Once again, I would like to reiterate that (a) this photo image was originally part of the TSI public archives in Pakistan; (b)its in any case an old photo the copyright of which expired under law a long time ago; and (c) I have personally obtained it from the archives, created the image in its present form and hold self rights to it which I have duly share openly in the public domain, here, now. I assure everyone on Wiki not to please worry, as there are no issues relating to it. I have gone to a lot of personal effort and trouble to obtain this material for this site, and it would be good if it is properly utilised now.
I would be very grateful if some tech-minded editor/user could kindly add this image to this article/page, thanks. 
Khani100 (talk) 07:08, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Image Addition Probs
Talk:Iron-sulfur protein

message: I propose to merge  Iron-sulfur cluster into this one.  We also have an article on ferredoxin, which I propose to leave alone. Comments are welcome, but soon because I plan to act otherwise in the next day or so.--Smokefoot (talk) 22:44, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal
Talk:Zinc finger protein

message: This article should probably be merged with the "Zinc Fingers" article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Serafap (talk • contribs) 15:00, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: I see that someone else has already made a comment, any objections to the merge? There's really no reason to have a separate article when the definition of a zinc finger protein is just a protein with zinc fingers in it. I would think a small section in the zinc fingers article would suffice to just note the other motifs that zinc fingers tend to appear with. Vramasub (talk) 14:49, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Old Aberdeen

message: I've just removed the quote, below, from the article. It seems rather out of place. Perhaps we could come up with a better way to present it, but I suspect an external link alone would be best. Any suggestions? – Kieran T (talk) 20:23, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical quote 

message: Old Aberdeen as described here appears to be the same place as the parish of Old Machar which is described in other sources such as GENUKI,  Bartholomew's A Gazetteer of the British Isles (1877), F.H. Groome's Ordnance Gazetteer of Scotland (1882-4) and Alexander Smith's A New History of Aberdeenshire (1875). It is hard to understand why there is no reference to Old Machar in the Wikipedia article.
Oldontarian (talk) 19:32, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old Aberdeen and Old Machar
Talk:Blair Babe

message: Not sure what point of this page is - both the point of having it at all - and the point of having it without, say, Kitty Ussher to name but one. --Newshound (talk) 15:08, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Protein disulfide-isomerase

message: quercetin-3-rutinoside (rutin) as an antithrombotic: doi:10.1172/JCI61228 JFW | T@lk 19:35, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thrombosis 

message: What to Add/Edit
--I am thinking about adding mechanisms of protein folding, redox signaling, and peptide binding. These would be accompanied with pictures. 
--I hope to expand the discussion on further functions of PDI.
--I also want to expand inhibition and consequences of inhibition/dysregulation. 
Potential Sources Below
    
Tianxiao3000 (talk) 22:06, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  potential additions/edits: mechanisms, functions, and consequences of inhibition/dysregulation
Talk:DNase footprinting assay

message: The page for DNA footprinting assay is not a forum for discussing alternate analysis of the results, especially when they are just conjecture.  If peer-reviewed research has suggested a possible difference from previous norms, please add it in a neutral style and properly reference it.--Scottieb 22:39, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Explanation

message: there is an other article about the same topic, called DNA footprinting. i suggest to delete this one, because it is only a stub.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.59.62.192 (talk) 11:22, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: DNA footprinting
Talk:Gina Carano

message: Gina Cerano was ranked n1 women’s featherweight division in 2009 Imintheweedz (talk) 17:04, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Cannolis (talk) 19:49, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 20 November 2023 

message: Should this page be updated to reflect her recent lawsuit against Disney for wrongful termination? Or should we wait for Disney's response to the lawsuit?
(More info on the lawsuit: https://www.msn.com/en-us/movies/news/actor-gina-carano-sues-lucasfilm-and-disney-over-her-firing-from-the-mandalorian/ar-BB1hSSq1) Abitowlish (talk) 01:13, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lawsuit against Disney 

message: Under the "political views" section the line "Weeks later, after facing calls from some fans to put her gender pronouns in her Twitter profile" is cited using two sources, neither one of which actually verifies what is being claimed. One of the sources states "A few weeks later, Carano said she came under fire for resisting calls to specify her pronouns in her Twitter bio" which explicitly marks the statement as a claim by Carano and not something that is being independently stated by a non-involved party. 
2A02:1210:1CA7:D700:54E8:63E:BDD0:BD40 (talk) 18:56, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Failure to cite, claim verification
Talk:Dave Aspden

message: I don't think this article has been updated properly in years, since it talks about a controversy from a couple years ago, as if it is current. I found a Barrie Examiner article, which actually talks about the police having decided not to lay charges. Maybe somebody with better knowledge of Barrie politics could update this page? It seems like it could also be cleaned up, so as not to read as an anti-Aspden rant (even if he was an awful mayor). MatttK (talk) 23:49, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs an update
Talk:2006 Argentine nuclear reactivation plan

message: An anon user keep sadding a copy-pasted text from a copyrighted site. The site is http://www.atomicinsights.com/FTROU/6-12-01.html, and it clearly states a copyright, not compatible with Wikipedia's policies (Copyright 2001-2006 Adams Atomic Engines, Inc. All rights reserved.) --Mariano(t/c) 20:31, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright Violation

message: hay un interwiki en la española,,, http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plan_de_reactivaci%C3%B3n_nuclear_argentino_2006  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.139.211.98 (talk) 00:10, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  nuevo interwiki 
Talk:Fothad II

message: What of Hugh, "deposed Bishop of St. Andrews" in 1188? See letter from Pope Clement; and Benedict of Peterborough's mention of these events in Anderson, Alan O., Scottish Annals from English Chroniclers AD500 to 1286, London, 1908: 296-298. David Lauder 18:48, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure what this has to do with Fothad, but do you mean Hugh the Chaplain? Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 09:30, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello, Deacon. Can't really add much as I don't really know. Pope Clement's letter refers to him as above. A mere chaplain would hardly command such a notice, surely? I'll dig the book out again and revert to you. David Lauder 13:30, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hugh
Talk:All Pakistan Women's Association

message: What does "R.H. Education" (section "Programs") stand for ?147.142.186.54 14:36, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abbrevation 

message: I was wandering whether that organization does not have an own website, given its apparent size and importance. I found only one short page about it at the UN web adress, from which the information here seems to have been taken.147.142.186.54 14:36, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Website 

message: I was looking for some small help. I created an article User:Bookku/Me Too movement (Pakistan) in user namespace. Article is almost ready but before taking to main namespace Looking for help in  English language Spell-check, punctuation, grammar check and corrections. Using better alternative words etc.  Thanks in advance. 
Bookku (talk) 14:20, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request of Help