Talk:Couples for Christ

message: I agree with the various groups around the world, especially from the United States, who are calling for/promoting unity. The following statements are taken from the letter of our elders from Southern California:
"to show our commitment to unity and to condemn all forms of disunity."
"We cannot afford to add more into the uncertainty that is already happening in CFC, nor add into the confusion and heartache that the present situation is bringing to our members, whose hearts bleed at the thought of a split..."
"...To be a lover of peace and worker for peace is one of the distinguishing marks of those who are true followers of the “Prince of Peace, our Lord Jesus”.
Therefore, I believe any note/remark/info that implies disunity must be deleted.
 
Don  , 4 Sept 2007  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.156.11.5 (talk) 02:50, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Couples for Christ

message: Ease off on the tables; prose is always better than a list. Same goes for sections that are almost entirely quotes. They need to be reformulated into our own words, or the article ends up being not much more than an extention of the church. Check out Wikipedia:Your_first_article for tips on what to do and what to avoid. Pairadox (talk) 02:45, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too many tables 

message: Notes 5, 6, 7 CBCP monitor: it should be indicated that the published article is a paid advertisement made by CFC-GMFI in CBCP monitor
Stag79 (talk) 18:24, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  NOTES 

message: For the record, I fully support the extensive cuts made in the article. The request for solid third-party references has been there for months without any change. Pichpich (talk) 20:44, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments on fleshing out of the article 

message: I removed these edits as being inappropriate in tone, placement, neutrality and verification.  But thought I would mention it here in case any of the content can be used to neutrally improve the controversy section in the article.  The wording of the section reads fairly neutrally to me at the moment - but I have absolutely no knowledge of the groups involved so that isn't based on any subject area expertise.  -- SiobhanHansa 13:05, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  CFC/FFL Controversy 

message: gawad kalinga is not under the couples for christ  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dennisalias007 (talk • contribs) 14:52, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  cfc 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Couples for Christ. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110926093316/http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_councils/laity/documents/rc_pc_laity_doc_20051114_associazioni_en.html to http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_councils/laity/documents/rc_pc_laity_doc_20051114_associazioni_en.html
*Added  tag to https://cfcyouthnj.weebly.com/uploads/3/8/1/1/381123/count_me_in_-_database.docx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:25, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Couples for Christ. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081223111413/http://couplesforchristglobal.org/v2.1/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=14&Itemid=40 to http://couplesforchristglobal.org/v2.1/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=14&Itemid=40
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090319204126/http://www.catholiccanonlaw.com/Associations.pdf to http://www.catholiccanonlaw.com/Associations.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150402154902/http://www.sfc-toronto.org/ to http://www.sfc-toronto.org/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:05, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Anyone who can provide verifiable reference / refetences about on how many is their population?
--Independent Bird (talk) 18:18, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Membership Population