Talk:Infiniti G20/Archive 1

message: I think that it would look better with all boxes in one colum but seemingly I cannot get it to do that. Bit of help...
:Thanks Rick. Zolielo 21:26, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help with wiki, adding infoboxes 

message: I would go for a horizontal one and retain the sums. Bravada, talk - 00:04, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have no clue how to do that. I think that you might be right for it surely will help people printing the article fit everything... The only concern that I have is that the information will be wider than can fit cleanly? Zoli Elo 18:45, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: 
 P10 CY Sales
Calendar Year	1991  	1992  	1993  	1994  	1995  	1996  	Total '91-'96 CY Sales
Sales        	13,929	14,592	16,545	17,248	16,818	13,467	92,599
? Zoli Elo 00:00, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Done more or less Zoli Elo 05:04, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

text: I will try to get that done. The way that it is now seems ok but what you suggest is better. Zoli Elo 18:45, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  CY table test 

message: I am sorry, but the "Trivia" trick won't work. Trivia do not belong in an encyclopedic article by definition, you will be asked to remove this section in its entirety. Still, information contained in such sections would often belong in the article if approporiately placed within the article. But paint codes and buyer's guides do not belong here by any heading. If the G20.net wants to use them as reference, why don't they place them in an appropriate forum (they seem to use a vBullettin structure)? Bravada, talk - 08:02, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  How to deal with paint codes and "consumer reports" section? 

message: Please use citation templates, especially , as it requires you to give the date on which you accessed the page, which in turn makes it easier for other users to check the referenced site even if it has changed or is down, by means of the Wayback Machine. Thanks, Bravada, talk - 08:05, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I will try to get that done. The way that it is now seems ok but what you suggest is better. Zoli Elo 18:45, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: I thank you for your help Bravada but I want to look for more views by pushing for GA and FA. The other users will surely have other points of view to add - which should be of use.
:Depending on who you'll get to review your article for GA, you can get an instant approval or dismissal. I would actually be the first one to fail it, but since I contributed to it, I can't. I can only say that even if you get somebody to approve it, it wouldn't feel too right. Your removal of the template notwithstanding, this is still not a really well written article, and no article with a "trivia" section should ever become a GA. Bravada, talk - 21:50, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Going for GA and FA 

message: The Good article nomination for  has failed    
:Section headings are not capitalised properly - see WP:MOS; trivia sections must be avoided - trivia is by definition unencyclopaedic so anything trivial should be scrapped, anything genuinely relevant should be incorporated elsewhere; and lists, like that under wheels and reliability, should be written as prose.  Worldtraveller 14:49, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:Good articles|Good Article]] [[Wikipedia:Good articles/Nominations|nomination]] has failed