lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:TVR Tamora

message: FYI  there is a problem with the content you keep adding back and that is a source. If you have found a source then you are welcome to add it back. U1 quattro TALK 16:39, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: What is the problem? There is no reason to doubt the veracity of the statement. It was added in 2014 by an ip who stated this in their edit summary: . As usual you go around deleting things without basis. Assume good faith, unless there is reason to believe otherwise.  Mr.choppers | ✎  18:38, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Also from WP:VERIFIABILITY (bolding mine): "Whether and how quickly material should be initially removed for not having an inline citation to a reliable source depends on the material and the overall state of the article. In some cases, editors may object if you remove material without giving them time to provide references; consider adding a citation needed tag as an interim step. When tagging or removing material for lacking an inline citation, please state your concern that it may not be possible to find a published reliable source and the material therefore may not be verifiable.[5] If you think the material is verifiable, you are encouraged to provide an inline citation yourself before considering whether to remove or tag it."  Mr.choppers | ✎  18:41, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Seeing your recent edit pattern, you're in violation of WP:VERIFIABILITY as after violating WP:3RR again, you came up with a source. You were told to find a citation (source) yet you continue to add the material back without finding a source. U1 quattro TALK 19:12, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Designers
Talk:Democracy Alliance

message: Describing it in the first sentence as "informal" seems wrong.  It has an office, website, and staff.Buellering (talk) 01:16, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Needs incorporation into article. 
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/07/us/politics/democrats-resistance-fundraising.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=first-column-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=0
Wikipietime (talk) 13:43, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  The ‘Resistance,’ Raising Big Money, Upends Liberal Politics
Talk:Photoionization mode

message: I am glad this page was NOT deleted. Yes, it needs a into line suitable for the layman. But  overall this article is scientifically rigorous, and covers difficult topics such as lasers and plasmas that aren't intended for someone not in that field. Quite frankly, I am a BSEE and studying and learning from this article. It has helped me a great deal but it is not "easy" for me, or for anyone who isn't a physicist. 1capybara (talk) 08:57, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

message: While it is difficult to be definitive, I do not see a copyvio here. The wording clearly matches this site, but:
* The words were added to Wikipedia in June 2007
* The same words on the potential source have a ast modified date of August 2007, after the addition to WP
* The author of that site is Tiberius Brastaviceanu
* The WP editor name is TiberiusB
I looked to see if both places were copied from another location, but did not find one.
The material is unreferenced, and the remaining maintenance tags should be addressed, but I am tentatively concluding that there isn't a copyright issue.--SPhilbrick(Talk) 17:37, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for looking at this. I'll remove the copyright tag but leave the other tags (OR, essay, etc.) --Kkmurray (talk) 17:48, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright review.
Talk:Sutherland Automotive Speedway

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: page moved, after applying common sense. –  wbm1058 (talk) 16:16, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Wyant Group Raceway →  – Race track renamed under new naming rights agreement effective February 1, 2022 Toontownrick (talk) 04:22, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

text: This is a contested technical request (permalink). GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 20:07, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 18 February 2022 

message: Is it known why they went with the name Sutherland considering it's nowhere near Sutherland in its current location? 23skidoo (talk) 18:28, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Agkistrodon

message: Any idea how these snakes acquired a common name of a type of Native American shoe? -Wschart (talk) 20:18, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moccasin? 

message: I believe that the ornate or Taylor's cantil, formerly considered a subspecies of A. bilinieatus, is now generally agreed to be a separate species, A. taylori. 
Also, I would like to see a complete listing of all the species formerly placed in this genus.  Mia229 (talk) 01:08, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  species of ''Agkistrodon'' 

message: Should this be included in this article, when the species is not a part of the agkistrodon genus?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.116.226.59 (talk) 05:09, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deinagkistrodon acutus Venom
Talk:Lal (actor)

message: Lal Creations redirects here, but it is unclear why. Superp (talk) 13:42, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lal Creations
Talk:Western cottonmouth

message: :If this snake is no longer considered a subspecies of the Agkistrodon piscivorus, but now recognized as the same, why is this article not merged like the Eastern Cottonmouth? The subspecies box makes it appear that the snake is still a subspecies titled "Western cottonmouth" with the separate Trinomial name of Agkistrodon piscivorus leucostoma.
:I can see no valid reasoning why this should not be merged, possibly to a section or subsection of Agkistrodon piscivorus, where some history of the taxonomy can be explained, as well as any valid "external links". One link, titled Western cottonmouth discusses looking for a Louisiana pine snake, which is indigenous to northwestern Louisiana and northeastern Texas, and finding a "Western cottonmouth", which would actually be an Agkistrodon piscivorus. --  Otr500 (talk) 19:05, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge to end confusion
Talk:Agkistrodon contortrix phaeogaster

message: :This article should be merged to Eastern copperhead (Agkistrodon contortrix). Everything from the "Description" section to the end is about a subspecies that does not currently exist. A section in the Eastern copperhead article can be dedicated to the history of the previously considered subspecies. --  Otr500 (talk) 01:10, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Calloselasma

message: What is the conservation status of this species?
RhinoMind (talk) 04:54, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conservation status?
Talk:Mamushi

message: User:MidasHotel20 moved Mamushi to "Japanese pit viper" without any discussion or explanation. The move is without consensus and inconsistent with the naming conventions.
"Japanese pit viper" is ambiguous because there are many different species of Japanese pit vipers, for example, the various Trimeresurus species (commonly named habu).
The common name "Mamushi" is precise and unambiguous because it refers specifically to the species Gloydius blomhoffii, and it is concise per WP:NAMINGCRITERIA.
"Japanese pit viper" is not a common name in English (see WP:COMMONNAME). The following review book, already cited in the article, says the common name in English is "mamushi": Mehrtens JM. 1987. Living Snakes of the World in Color. New York: Sterling Publishers. 480 pp. .
Most peer-reviewed English academic publications use "mamushi", including the following papers which are already cited in the article:
Watanabe H, Nagatake T, Matsumoto K, Sakamoto T, Rikitomi N, Hirano E. 1992. Effectiveness of protease inhibition in severe mamushi bite. Procs. XXXIV Annual Meetings of Japan Society of Tropical Medicine, 25–26 Nov 1992, Nagasaki, p.75. Preprint. Also published by same authors as Jpn J Trop Med Hyg, 21(1):39–92, 1993.
85.255.234.37 (talk) 23:04, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title should follow [[WP:NAME|naming conventions in WP:NAME]]
Talk:Saint John's School (San Juan)

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 03:48, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]]
Talk:Connetquot High School

message: do not discuss the columbine-type incident in article anymore. was not severe.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.79.170.163 (talk) 22:48, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Good deletion.  Crap like that commonly creeps into high school articles and should be deleted unless actually sourced.--Neighborhoodpalmreader (talk) 06:01, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: With a few years of perspective, does the stuff about the "plot" even belong here?  Maybe as a line in a larger section on the school's history, but I can't see something that didn't happen to the school rating a whole section. Gtwfan52 (talk) 06:26, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Here I Am (Natalie Gauci song)

message: This song is important because it is the single which will be released by the winner of Australian Idol 2007.
This song will likely be a number one single in the Australian Music Charts, the Aria Charts. See Night of My Life. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Someone111111 (talk • contribs) 
:* It is too short, it does not meet Wikipedia's standards for articles and it cites no sources or references. User Doe    ☻T   ☼C  02:16, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: * Agree with delete. Although this song may be popular in the futue, it has not yet been released. Too early for this article. --Breno talk 03:00, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *While I agree that the article is unsuitable, it doesn't happen to meet any of the CSD criteria. I'm removing the speedy tag and suggest someone either prod or afd this instead. Natalie (talk) 03:40, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion discussion
Talk:Lance Bass/Archive01

message: What is a "hip-hop relationship with rapper Mike Jones" and where did that come from?
I can't find any evidence of one person speculating it, much less "many".  There's no connection I can find between the two mentioned anywhere.  I removed the line, unless there's a source to back this up.  (I don't see the point of the American Idol paragraph in general.  I only recall hearing it in one radio interview, is it even important?  It was in reference season two, as compared to the first.  Hardly seems encyclopedia worthy.)
Secondbest 04:28, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source? 

message: I literally laughed out loud when I read the following in the article:
:"...grossed only $4.3 million at the US domestic box office, but had a production budget of $16 million. The film was produced by Bacon & Eggs LLC (formerly A Happy Place)..."
I guess I wouldn't call it A Happy Place anymore, either, after losing $11.7 million .... I know, it's silly, but so is a lot of the other stuff on this Talk page. Have good days.—Chidom talk  18:33, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Humor abounds
Category talk:Political controversies

message: This category is being used as a catch-all for all manner of things. We need to provide a definition explaining what it is meant to be used for. Suggestions?? (please alert me on my talk page if you post a reply) Cgingold (talk) 02:27, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Definition/restriction needed

message: This category is listed on the category page as a related category. Shouldn't it rather be categorized into the present category as a subset? I'll make this change unless there are any objections. __meco (talk) 10:20, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Now effected. __meco (talk) 07:46, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category:Political scandals
Talk:Darvand

message: As regards my earlier edit, the change in emphasis was not accidental - rather I felt that the more notable subject was the Iranian city, as a search on the terms seola and darvand produces only 5 ghits. Nevertheless, for the moment I have categorised as a fictional object. Thanks, Jeodesic (talk) 02:28, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Personal preference for me would be to disambiguate, with a quick summary of the fictional term, such as "A Darvand is the child of an angel and a human in the novel Seola by Anne Eliza Smith." and a link to Darvand, Iran, as I don't see that the fictional being could be expanded much beyond that. Jeodesic (talk) 11:20, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Red Sea rig

message: * Oppose. Red Sea rig and Territory Rig are different things. 89.147.70.233 (talk) 01:32, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Territory Rig]]
Talk:Chicken Licken (restaurant)

message: I don't understand what the following sentence has to do with this company:
"Chicken Licken has also made a reference in the 1972 Movie: The Mechanic, starring Charles Bronson."
What does this mean?  I don't know anything about this company so I am reluctant to edit the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.26.247.65 (talk • contribs) 2:41, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Henry S. Harper

message: Pulled the notability tag as a quick look found that he existed, and being a survivor of Titanic is notable enough to warrant inclusion via Wikipedia is not a paper encyclopedia.   Pharmboy (talk) 02:51, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Looks like someone PRODed the article without reading the talk page.  Someone else pulled the PROD tage before I had a chance, and appears to be working on the article now.  Survivors of the Titanic are pretty much notable for just being survivors, so PRODs/Speedy/etc are not worth attempting.  You can AFD the article if you so choose, but I'm pretty sure it will pass easily as notable.  Please take the time to actually read PROD policy and Notability policy before PRODing or otherwise tagging.  PHARMBOY (TALK) 00:54, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Contested PROD
Talk:San Acacio, Colorado

message: I'm doing a bit of cleanup and found this page links to "Saint Acacius" (which is about to become a redirect to the disambiguation page on "Acacius"). There are multiple saints named Acacius, in both the Catholic and Orthodox tradition. Could somebody find which saint, exactly, the town is named after? RexSueciae (talk) 08:33, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which Acacius?
Talk:The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in Hawaii

message: This article has enough information to not be a stub.  Importance is mid for Hawaii because of amount of church involvment with the state.  Importance is mid for LDS Movement because of geographical constraint. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dmm1169 (talk • contribs) 09:50, 15 January 2009 The preceding by Dmm1169 was moved here from Talk:The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in Hawaii/Comments
:Sounds about right. Viriditas (talk) 10:30, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: I found this article from an 1846 newspaper documenting Mormon emigrants from Honolulu returning to San Francisco, yet the article doesn't states that emigration began in 1850. https://cdnc.ucr.edu/cgi-bin/cdnc?a=d&d=C18460815&e=-------en--20--1--txt-txIN--------1 ৳€Ø฿€ƦȺ₡Ⱥƪ৳€Ø฿€ƦȺ₡Ⱥƪ 13:40, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  First settlers? 

message: I may very well be missing something, so I thought I'd add a note here to seek clarification.  With the recent good faith edit by Bobdog54, I am not sure if the date being noted is specific to the citation that accompanies page or not, or if it ties to another reference.  The citation provided does not actually have any date associated with it, which can certainly create challenges when trying to make it timeless.  That is why I had edited to show the information was as of February 2019 - only because it's the current date.  As I said, maybe the September 2018 date is referring to something else, which ought to be clarified, as it certainly isn't on the church's newsroom statistics page. ChristensenMJ (talk) 16:24, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The original citation that I updated showed a date of 9/10/18 (I think), so I used that as the date of the data given. Maybe they updated the website on Feb. 1, 2019. Since we don't know for sure - I bow to ChristensenMJ and we can both be happy that the article info is updated. Thank you for your kind comment.bobdog54 (talk) 21:37, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  I don't know when it was updated, since the citation, at least the one tied to that sentence, doesn't have any date on it.  That what seemed to cause some confusion.  Other than the annual statistical report the church produces, many of their individual statistics pages, such as this one, don't seem to have dates on them.  I am ok either way, but just wanted to note the circumstance.  Thanks for your efforts! ChristensenMJ (talk) 22:23, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date for cited information
Talk:Agamemnon (comics)

message: I have redirected this article based on the following three pages:
*Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, namely Wikipedia articles on published works (such as fictional stories) should cover their real-world context and sourced analysis, offering detail on a work's development, impact or historical significance, not solely a detailed summary of that work's plot.
*Wikipedia:Notability (fiction), namely Avoid creating new articles on fictional topics that lack substantial real-world content (and ideally an out-of-universe perspective) from the onset. Editors must prove, preferably in the article itself, that there is an availability of sources providing real-world information by: providing hyperlinks to such sources; outlining a rewrite, expansion, or merge plan; and/or gaining the consensus of established editors.
*Wikipedia:Manual of Style, namely There are specific notability prerequisites to be met by fictional subjects to warrant articles specifically about them. As mentioned earlier, the rule of thumb is that if the topic is sufficiently notable, secondary sources should be available. (snip) It is important that articles give due weight to all aspects of the subject, and to avoid placing undue emphasis on minor points. This concerns all elements of the article page, including infoboxes and succession boxes as well as images and the text.
Before restoring a version of the article prior top the redirect, please consider whether it meets the above criteria.  If not, based on policy and guidance, the article should remain a redirect. Hiding Talk  16:10, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect 

message: I have removed the following as it has been without a source since 2009:
From the Betrayal section:
When the Pantheon finds Agamemnon later he is in his teenage form in the city of Boston. He is being pursued by the renegade Pantheon member Jason. After a confrontation in Fenway Park, Agamemnon and the Hulk are transported to the after-life realm of Hela. After an undetermined time of the Hulk fighting Hela's skeletal forces, Agamemnon pleads for Hela to let the two go based on a past emotional connection (later revealed to be that they are half-siblings, through their father, Loki). She reluctantly agrees.
Regards, Hiding T  08:51, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed unsourced material
Talk:Flanker (rugby union)

message: "The set responsibilities of a flankers are fewer then all other positions in a rugby team", says the article. What about the centres? AFAI understand the laws, flankers are required to be part of scrums (i.e. has a set responsibility) while centres play the game completely freely and are never required (other than from tactics) to be in a certain position, or to perform any duty. Or am I interpreting the concept of "set responsibilities" wrong? I just think the wording is very definitive, and since it is unsourced I think it should be made weaker somehow. Thoughts? /Kriko (talk) 15:08, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah you are right. In the context of the forwards though, they probably have the least responsibilities. - Shudde talk 22:09, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: All right, I agree. Good change /Kriko (talk) 15:51, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  No set responsibilities? 

message: This is just a subjective list of a few flankers. Surely there's a better way to manage this? Hall of Fame flankers perhaps? Depor23 (talk) 14:53, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Notable flankers' section 

message: In my time in school rugby (mid 1960s) this position was known as breakaway. Andrewa (talk) 16:37, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Breakaway
Talk:Riverside South, Ottawa

message: In the Riverside South article, should "O-Train" be switched to "light rail" or "LRT"? Since this project has been approved, this article might be better served with the right terminology regarding the LRT and the Strandherd Armstrong bridge. Perhaps someone who knows more than I can add something definitive. —Preceding unsigned comment added by  216.58.101.231 (talk • contribs) 
Well we can changed the link caption but it will still redirect to the O-Train article, as all the elements of the possible expansions and the contreversies, etc, etc are in that article.--JForget 14:55, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Question on LRT
Talk:List of minor Animaniacs characters

message: The text here makes it quite clear that two cartoons featuring Slappy Squirrel's enemy, Walter the Wolf, got serious objections from Jewish anti-defamation groups.
I've never heard anything about this, nor have I been able to find anything about it elsewhere online. I'm Jewish myself, and never thought of Walter as anything but hysterical in his old-time Yiddish inflection; I sort of think that if these objections really existed, I'd have heard about them.
Are you sure we aren't just presuming these objections existed? Ramapith (talk) 03:21, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Walter the Wolf meets the ADL?
Talk:Eleionomae

message: Is this a personal fantasy generated from over-exposure to market-driven manufactured culture? It was created 14:50, 21 September 2005 by anonymous passer-by User:81.153.61.205 who has made no edits before or since. Edits since then have been mindless category-making, stub-sorting and the like busywork.  --Wetman (talk) 03:29, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hopefully, somebody will expand this article. Deucalionite (talk) 22:05, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This is an internet confabulation. See German WP. --WolfgangRieger (talk) 09:22, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Delete this?
Talk:Kim Junsu/Archive 1

message: I have my doubts about whether or not this page should exist, as it's just a copy of the information from the TVXQ page... any thoughts?
Mitsuki152 (talk) 03:55, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it shouldn't exist at all.  It is just basically a copy info from TVXQ.  As much as I love DBSK, the members haven't done enough to have their own page. 206.40.103.55 (talk) 22:57, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: All right. I'm glad that was settled. Mitsuki152 (talk) 14:21, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Delete?