Talk:Sotho people

message: Hello,
WikiProject Ethnic groups has added new assessment criteria for Ethnic Groups articles.
I rated the Basotho) article: Start-Class, with the following comments (see link to ratings summary page in the Ethnic groups template atop this talk page):
*Little or no information about recent history, language, culture, religion, etc.
You can give this article (and any other article within the WikiProject) a rating, as described below.
:-->How to assess articles
Revisions of assessment ratings can be made by assigning an appropriate value via the class parameter in the WikiProject Ethnic groups project banner  that is currently placed at the top of Ethnic groups articles' talk pages. Quality assessment guidelines are at the Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team's assessment system page. After rating the article, please provide a short summary to explain your ratings and/or identify the strengths and weaknesses. To add the summary, please edit this article's ratings summary page. A link to this page can be found in the  template on the article's talk page.
Please see the Project's article rating and assessment scheme for more information and the details and criteria for each rating value. A brief version can be found at  Template talk:Ethnic groups. You can also  enquire at the Ethnic groups Project's main discussion board for assistance.
Another way to help out that could be an enjoyable pastime is to visit  :Category:Unassessed Ethnic groups articles, find an interesting-looking article to read, and carefully assess it following those guidelines.
Thanks! --Ling.Nut 14:11, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Assessment Criteria for Ethnic Groups articles 

message: "excellent verifiable content", hey? Want to include my discourse on the confusion over the name "Basotho", or should I try and reword it first? Zyxoas (talk to me - I'll listen) 12:38, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wachasey!!? 

message: For dedicated editors of this page: The "Related Groups" info was removed from all  infoboxes. Comments may be left here. Ling.Nut 23:04, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "related groups" info removed from infobox 

message: Are we saying that without Moshoeshoe there would be no Sotho people? That's what the intro says. Garibaldi unitted the Italaians, Bismark united the Germans, but I've never heard it said that they created such nations. I think this needs toning down. With or without Moshoeshoe there WOULD have been Sotho people. Rui Gabriel Correia (talk) 14:33, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: nthebe clans 41.121.54.201 (talk) 11:03, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  just a question 

message: Substituted at 06:33, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Sotho people. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100714021116/http://www.hsrc.ac.za/HSRC_Review_Article-47.phtml to http://www.hsrc.ac.za/HSRC_Review_Article-47.phtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:28, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified