lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:New Caledonian rail

message: The new form for links to the Australian Faunal Dierectory is
http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/abrs/online-resources/fauna/afd/taxa/taxon name
This species is not present, although the genus is 
http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/abrs/online-resources/fauna/afd/taxa/Gallirallus;Rallinae  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Paul Murray (talk • contribs) 23:56, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Australian Faunal Directory 
Talk:Siberian crane

message: Thanks 103.132.196.250 (talk) 07:11, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gritting Thanks 

message: Siberian cranes migrate from____to____becausebof____ 2409:4050:2E32:DFFB:1DE3:ED91:8BB2:2EB7 (talk) 16:23, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Science (Biology)
Talk:Margaret of York (1472)

message: This page has a link that is captioned "Elizabeth, Queen of England" but it doesn't connect to Queen Elizabeth. It conncects to one of the Elizabeths of York. I could not figure out how to fix it.69.86.239.244 (talk) 11:54, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It links to an Elizabeth who was queen consort.  A little misleading, perhaps, but technically accurate. 1bandsaw (talk) 16:07, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Newlywed Game

message: When was the Gary Kroger version of TNG reran on GSN? The Bob Eubanks and Jim lange version only have been reran.
--24.228.70.72 22:13, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Kroeger

message: I don't remember it on GSN
:Fixed. Lambertman 22:21, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gary Kroger's TNG on GSN?  

message: Why does that search term redirect here?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.89.243.185 (talk) 02:40, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  In the butt 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Up the butt. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 17#Up the butt until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Hog Farm  Bacon 20:33, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Up the butt" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :In the butt. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 17#In the butt until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Hog Farm  Bacon 20:35, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "In the butt" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Category talk:Ballot measures in the United States

message: Based on the current contents of this category :Category:Initiatives and referendums in the United States, it would be better named "Ballot measures in the United States" or "Ballot propositions in the United States."
There are 3 types of ballot measures/propositions:
* initiatives, which are put on the ballot by popular petition;
* referenda, which repeal an act of the legislature; and
* legislative referrals, which the legislature votes to place on the ballot.
(None of this is currently explained very adequately on the Wikipedia pages; I intend to fix them when I get the chance.)
Since US state pages break down measures by year, not by type, it would make more sense for the parent category to include all 3 types.
-Pete 22:18, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change category name
Talk:Grenada dove

message: The following The current uproar over development of the Mount Sanctuary is misplaced and misleading. The Grenada Dove is not adequately protected under current management plans. Funding and properly arranged conservation easements with money-generating entities such as resorts not only provide protection but also increase the opportunity for tourism within the Grenadian economy. Conservation efforts for this species will only work when the needs of all stakeholders are addressed. If the Grenada Dove is to continue to exist then individuals involved in its conservation must reevaluate current methods of preserving this species, stop perpetuating inaccurate data about the species, and seek alternatives that are win-win for both the Grenada Dove and the Grenadian people is not neutral or unbiased and reads like a press statement from the developers. This article has undergone numerous edits from anonymous IPs  from both sides of the debate. Wikipedia is not a battleground or a soapbox. There seems to be a lot of info that has been added to this and that is great but we need to make this article neutral and balanced.  Sabine's Sunbird  talk 05:44, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Many statements in the 'current issues' section need proper referencing as well as neutralising the tendentious language.  There are also inline references throughout the article that are not expanded or mentioned in the list of references. Maias 06:46, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed some blatantly POV statements but it still needs plenty of work. Maias 10:14, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bias in the article
Talk:Pemmasani Nayaks

message: Aside from the grammar, style, and tone (all of which need work) and the wikification (unwikified lead, etc.), the article is couched in very one-sided language; it makes very dogmatic statements about events with no sign that there might be alternative interpretations and views. --Mel Etitis  (Talk) 22:19, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problems 

message: The editing process is on. Improvements are being carried out.Kumarrao 18:39, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please give sources for new material, otherwise your work might be reverted. --Mel Etitis  (Talk) 09:22, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Editing

message: Dear Etitis, I addded new references. I shall Wikify the article soon and correct style, grammar etc.,Kumarrao 18:02, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Editing
Talk:Buka Island

message: Deleted section about north american tribe of Bukas. This could be true, but there are hundreds of strange rumours about this sort of thing that float around Buka and are often false. This would be quite an extraordinary fact if true (it sounds highly implausible - tribe of Bukas , move to North America in the mid 90s, over one hundred now present?), and would require some sort of evidence.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pinari (talk • contribs) 11:31, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Video lucah 203.8.206.98 (talk) 16:15, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  North American Tribe 

message: This entire article, word for word, is from NationMaster.com . As this is violation of copyright, I am tagging the article foe Speedy Deletion. 159.221.32.10 (talk) 01:19, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I reverted to a non-copyrighted version. It could probably use someone familiar with the subject to clean it up. faithless (speak) 01:43, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source
Talk:Economic schools of thought

message: I posted this a moment ago on the History of economics page...
:I want to open up the talk on merging Economic schools of thought with the history of economics articles. Here's the reason. I think that if you used the title "History of economic thought" then there's nothing to distinguish the two. If there is something, what is it? JEL which people keep talking about distinguishes Economic history from Schools of thought, but of course the former is about how economies (rather than economic theories) have evolved through history. Someone suggested above that if it's a current a current school of thought (e.g. neoclassicism) then it ain't history. It's present. Well, I personally don't believe in an End of history and to be fair schools of thought that may be predominant today have themselves had a history which on an encyclopedia deserves some unified explanation. Feel free to reply, agree, denounce what I've said, etc. Wikidea 02:11, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Further to that, this article is fairly small by comparison and can easily be put into a proper article titled "History of economic thought". Wikidea 02:13, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  More merging
Talk:David Theo Goldberg

message: David Theo Goldberg is a leading scholar of critical race theory and has lectured on this topic around the world.  His book Racist Culture is widely cited.  He has been interviewed by the BBC and KPFA.  David E. Goldberg has a wikipedia page; I'm sure he's significant as a scientist; similarly, David Theo Goldberg is a very significant figure in humanistic and sociological fields. --Susca 22:21, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Honey Is Cool

message: I suggest a rewrite in a neutral tone and with a some logical design. --Stormbay (talk) 03:41, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite 

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:15, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]]
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Books/Library article

message: This is just my personal summary:
#Based on recent discussions at AfD, I do not think most individual subject branch university libraries will be considered notable, and I would suggest  incorporating them as sections into the main article. It is now possible to link to a section of an article, e.g. <nowikii>Y University Library#Jones Art Library</nowiki> There are, of course, some truly notable exceptions. 
#Similarly, I do not think any neighborhood branch library will be considered notable; with very rare exceptions I do not think they will be considered worth a section, and I suggest a list within the main article for the city library..
#Individual town libraries have also been held non-notable, and are usually redirected to a section of the article on the town. County libraries, similarly. 
#It doesn't matter whether we who are interested in them think them notable, because the consensus at WP apparently doesn't. I wouldn't try without very clear very reliable sources, in more than the local or college newspaper. On the precedent of schools, truly notable historic buildings may serve as a justification. DGG 22:26, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: notability of branch libraries
Talk:Alberta Senate nominee elections

message: This entry needs a rewrite from top to bottom.  There is a lot of hyperbolic bullshit, and scant few facts and refs.  I'd delete it, but I don't feel like being bullied again by some jerk with 40,000+ edits (used as proof that I *must* be wrong).
Frankly, is the title even accurate? I'm sure many Albertans think it is, but is an election an election when nobody is actually ELECTED? HuntClubJoe (talk) 19:19, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Start-class, indeed! 

message: The article says that "Senate reform is popular in Western Canada, where the provinces are under-represented in the House of Commons due to representation by population." But stating that the western provinces are "under-represented" is POV. The residents of those provinces might feel they're under-represented, but the people of Eastern Canada would tend to say that the western provinces have exactly the appropriate level of representation given their lower population. Surely there's a more NPOV way of stating this than what the article currently uses. 207.98.198.84 (talk) 20:38, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  under-represented? 
Talk:Trinidad piping guan

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Pipile which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 16:31, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Piping guan which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 19:15, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Junin grebe

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. per WP:COMMONNAME. (closed by non-admin page mover) ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 17:33, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Junin grebe →  – spelling fix Chumzwumz68 (talk) 18:55, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Birds has been notified of this discussion. UtherSRG (talk) 10:23, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

text: Oppose - Fails WP:COMMMONNAME as the current title has about 1.5x the results as the proposed when doing a Google search. - UtherSRG (talk) 10:24, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

text: Support - moving it to the spelling used in the native language where this bird is found seems pretty uncontroversial to me. Iloveparrots (talk) 14:44, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

text: Oppose IOU doesn't use the acute accent, and neither due most of the other global checklists. AryKun (talk) 08:09, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 6 September 2023
Talk:Andy Bolton

message: Kind of a disappointment not to see a picture of this guy!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.73.248.37 (talk) 01:37, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image? 
Talk:University of Missouri Children's Hospital

message: Does the Children's division of Women's and Children hospital merit its own page? It would seem like the most appropriate place for this information would be in a subsection of the University of Missouri Women's and Children's Hospital page (which already exists). In light of the issue box point regarding this article's self-advertisement tone, perhaps any information that doesn't exist on the Women and Children's article could just be merged into it?
Kyrios Sampson (talk) 04:50, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page redundancy
Talk:Andy Harper

message: Harper is not important enough to have his own page IMO.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.169.224.87 (talk) 10:47, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: The last few sentences of this appear appear to be vandalism.
210.49.47.26 09:25, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: But since it is questionable and unsourced about a living person it must be removed per Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons Jons63 (talk) 13:25, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page appears to be vandalised
Talk:Lae

message: 2022: They've put money into fixing the roads, and are quite proud of the effect. Existing reference is from 2015. 121.200.27.15 (talk) 10:19, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roads
Talk:Jerdon's courser

message: The original description can be useful on occassion and is in Public domain. Shyamal (talk) 15:04, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original description 
Talk:Andy Powell (rugby)

message: I think this article should be renamed Andy Powell (rugby) to reflect the fact he is now a player of both codes. 90.209.255.77 (talk) 15:13, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename 
Talk:Wild Mountain Thyme

message: Thank you to whoever fixed this page. It was very poorly written before. I was about to get around to it myself.
by Wild Mountain Thyme 22:53, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The clean-up 

message: I believe the facts are as follows (and I have no axe to grind...I just want to get the facts right):
*Wild Mountain Thyme is not a traditional song. It was composed by Francis McPeak (and his father).
*The McPeak family are Irish
*The published version in my possession attributes the words and music to Francis McPeak (Alasdair Clayre, 100 Folk Songs and New Songs, Wolfe Publishing Ltd, London, 1968)
*The copyright is owned by the Eglish Folk Dance and Song Society, who presumably published it on behalf of McPeak.
*It is often erroniously believed to be a traditional song in the public domain, but is actually a composed song with a copyright owner.
*It is very clearly based on the words and music of "The Braes of Balquhidder" by Robert Tannahill. 
*The Braes of Balquhidder is a Scots song describing an identifiable geographical location in Scotland.
Is this right? Bluewave (talk) 20:03, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the verbatim copy of this last paragraph from the article itself. This information is very interesting and really needs to be in the article. However, it needs to be incoprorated into the article in a non-biased, encyclopedic way. Most importantly, it needs to have reliable, third party inline references supporting it. --Kohoutek1138 (talk) 21:36, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd second that. It would make sense of the relationship between WMT and "Braes o' Balquihidder" but needs to be cited. For instance, is there a source for the age of the tune and for McPeake's own comments about the song? It would be great if we could add them. By the way, this is not that unusual! There are lots of examples of folk song collectors registering the copyright of the material that they collected. There are also more blatant things like Paul Simon copyrighting the guitar accompaniment to "Scarborough Fair", that he learnt from Martin Carthy. Bluewave (talk) 07:40, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Coming late to this party, but the linguistic claim made above here is on very shaky ground. Ireland is not linguistically or culturally homogeneous, and in particular when talking about Northern Ireland one needs to be aware of the influence of Ulster Scots. Mhardcastle (talk) 18:23, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Irish or Scots?

message: The air The three carles o' Buchanan is said on Ceolas to be given in 
This is listed in Yale University's Beinecke Music library at call number M1746 G722 no.1
If someone is able to check it, that would be useful.LeadSongDog come howl! 07:09, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tune available at Yale?
Talk:Ángel Atienza

message: I am a little confused about the section and what it is going for.  If anyone has knowledge and can help make it clear that would be appreciated. Dreambeaver (talk) 06:33, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it just needed bullets for formatting. Although the first one is still a bit confusing. LogicalFinance33 (talk) 04:13, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Awards section
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Consensus poll

message: ==A poll? Aren't they evil?== 
Yes. However, given the huge interest here, I think it best we try to get input from as many sources as possible. The poll and the discussion will actually show us the relationship between !votes and consensus, and should get a general baseline for what the community thinks. The discussion will be consensus, polls merely help confirm. Prodego talk 22:59, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion of the poll

message: Yes. However, given the huge interest here, I think it best we try to get input from as many sources as possible. The poll and the discussion will actually show us the relationship between !votes and consensus, and should get a general baseline for what the community thinks. The discussion will be consensus, polls merely help confirm. Prodego talk 22:59, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: A poll? Aren't they evil?
Talk:Landrücken Tunnel

message: This article was translated by Nankai 23:02, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article source 
Talk:Elegiac

message: I think someone who knows more about music can address this better: What does elegiac mean when referred to in music. For example, Rachmaninoff's "Trio Elegiac," or Brahms' "E minor Sonata," which is described in the liner notes of the recording I have as being elegiac. Thanks Physics-fan3.14 23:02, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In music "elegiac" is a more general term, referring to the mood or subject matter, without specifically involving, say, meter.  Musical elegies are often meditations on mortality, death, loss:  a famous example is Elgar's Cello Concerto, which, if I remember correctly, he wrote for a friend who was killed in the First World War, and is almost always described as "elegiac".  Musical elegies are in minor keys more often than not.  BTW these kinds of questions are best left on the Reference Desk, where they get answered quickly.  Cheers,  Antandrus  (talk) 15:43, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Fisher separation theorem

message: Not Sufficient Data Included
Box seems to include M-M capital structure irrelevance theorem. Can claims 2, 3 be linked to Fisher's numbered paragraphs? Colin Rowat (talk) 22:48, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
Talk:John Tice

message: Is this the correct John Tice? The founder of AIMS who died 16Dec2019 was born in 1947, but the sportsman was born in 1960 (and may well still be alive).
acahopkins (talk) 21:41, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possibly suspect or just confused persons
Talk:Jake Allex

message: For those who are interested in these types of articles:
Below are the references (which were not used as inline citations) that are dead.  Without the inline citations the relevance of these references could not be determined.  Please help by finding working citations, add them back into the article, and then use them as inline citations.  
*of Honor 
*Serbian Orthodox
*Patriotism
*day in US Military History
*Front Association
*Record
Thanks. Pknkly (talk) 18:37, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Dead references
Talk:Billy Conn

message: Does he have 14 or 15 wins on knockout?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.124.136.51 (talk) 15:07, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wins on knockout 
Talk:Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Cincinnati

message: The original section title has been reverted. The only finding of guilt dealt with the mishandling of the allegegations, and not the allegations themselves. SonPraises (talk) (contributions) 18:31, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Section Title reverted

message: I just noticed that Elder, Moeller and Schnurr are listed under Auxiliary Bishops.  I don't believe that's correct.  They are all Coadjutors.  Coadjutors are not Auxiliaries.  I'm not bold enough to change the page, but I thought I'd point this out while I get up the nerve. JordanHenderson (talk) 16:31, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Coadjutors not Auxiliaries

message: I believe that the official patron saint of the Archdiocese of Cincinnati is St. Francis de Sales (not St. Peter, as indicated in the article). Please change this if it can be verified.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.49.45.10 (talk) 02:03, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Patron Saint 

message: I was bold enough to add an entry to the bottom of the list of Auxiliary Bishops about Joseph Binzer.  Joseph Binzer needs a Wikipedia article.  I'm not bold enough to write that myself.  Volunteers? JordanHenderson (talk) 11:37, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Joseph R. Binzer 