lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Stupid!

message: Maybe we should add a list of characters that are normally in the show like on the page for Goodness Gracious Me I've started the list, by adding a characters.--TheDalek 14:33, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of Characters ? 

message: I like how much effort has gone into this article, props to the people who put it together. However, I think it requires a fair bit of work. In some cases, there is too much information on trivial matters, and in other (somewhat amusing) instances there are some random non sequiturs, like the bit that started talking about Greenland's political status. Somewhat off-topic for a kid's show, I think. I have tidied up a lot of the unnecessary stuff but the character list needs some toning down as it is far too long and detailed. I always think it's important to note what is important about the show, not everything you can remember - it's really off-putting to readers who are not fans of the show. Plus, everything needs to be cited, which is something that needs to be worked on.
If anyone's reading this, then chances are you contributed to the article so thank you, as it reflects a decent amount of effort and work. It just needs some tweaking to make it a better class article. I'll be working on some more tidying soon, then developing it from there. Sometimes you have to destroy in order to rebuild. Ray and jub (talk) 16:01, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Diamond in the Rough
Talk:I Got the Hook-Up

message: I merged the soundtrack here since the two article lack of text (and notability), so now their united page is filled somewhat. Can somebody write the plot for it? Lajbi Holla @ meWho's the boss? 14:41, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:American Institute in Taiwan

message: I removed the following sentences from the article because I am pretty sure that this information is dated and not current.
:"The staff consists of nominally private citizens, but these are officials of the United States Department of State who are technically on leave, although they continue to collect seniority . Funding for AIT comes exclusively from the United States government ."
Please return this to the main page if you can find a current reference.  I will keep looking myself.--M4701 14:42, 25 July 2006 (UTCt
I have supplied the citation (Section 503 of the Foreign Service Act of 1980, as amended by the Department of State Authorization Act, Fiscal Year 2003) and reworded the correction. Mattremote (talk) 07:11, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Status of AIT employees

message: Who are the shareholders in AIT and should it not be properly called "American Institute in Taiwan, Inc." or does it have a long corporate type name...maybe not? any one know?
Regards. Staighre (talk) 21:33, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: corporate details

message: The link for David Dean, the director, should not point to david dean, the football coach  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.48.72.160 (talk) 23:54, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  David Dean 

message: What is meant by "non-profit profit corporation"? Kind regards, Matt Heard (talk) 07:25, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Non-profit profit corporation" 

message: If I'm browsing to an article expounding on the particulars of a facet of diplomatic relations between two nations, I probably don't need a first-grade primer on what diplomacy is.
However, if I see a sentence about the US establishing diplomatic relations with China and I click on that link, I'm probably going to be less surprised by finding information on US relations with China than I would be by finding a basic primer on diplomacy. Jsharpminor (talk) 04:50, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: And just in case some user has actually gotten this far and still doesn't have the first clue of what diplomacy is, I have reinstated the link to the Diplomacy article earlier in the lead. Jsharpminor (talk) 04:58, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  <nowiki>[[Diplomacy|diplomatic relations]]</nowiki> 

message: I propose to merge Talk:American institute in taiwan into Talk:American Institute in Taiwan. Because  is only a redirect page for American Institute in Taiwan for a long time; Talk:American institute in taiwan is only a blank page from this talk page was created until now, I think it is a good idea to complete this page merger.
123.150.182.179
06:49, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal
Talk:Badroulbadour

message: The story of Aladdin here doesn't match the one in the Aladdin article. Tha Aladdin article says the two genies were encountered spereately, not from the same lamp, and the socond one is good. Also, the Aladdin article claims that none of the characters are Arabian, but rather African and Chinese. The Badroulbadour article says that she is an Arabian princess. Can we have some clarifications? Crockalley 14:42, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Aladdin
Talk:Haploinsufficiency

message: For each of the diseases listed, what is the effect if the defective gene is present twice (= homozygous)?
The page Achondroplastic dwarfism says that a baby with the achondroplastic dwarfism gene homozygous dies before or soon after birth. Anthony Appleyard 14:42, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed achondroplasia, sounds more like a hypermorph - dominant gain-of-function - than haploinsufficiency. Dr d12 18:15, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The homozygous form

message: Does any one have any thoughts on renaming this page 'Dosage sensitivity' and including Triplosensitivity as the opposite of Haploinsufficiency. It seems like over kill to create a separate TS page.
Abergabe (talk) 15:57, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Dosage sensitivity and Triplosensitivity

message: The first paragraph appears to me to say the same facts in about 4 different sentences...
"to explain a phenotype when a diploid organism has lost one copy of a gene and is left with a single functional copy"
"by a loss-of-function mutation, in which having only one copy of the wild-type allele is not sufficient to produce the wild-type phenotype"
"has a single functional copy of a gene, and that single copy does not produce enough product to display the wild type's phenotypic characteristics"
"general assumption is that the single remaining functional copy of the gene cannot provide sufficient gene product (typically a protein) to preserve the wild-type phenotype"
I'm not that familiar with this topic, but it feels like this needs simplifying.  Zorgster (talk) 12:24, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Repetition in 1st paragraph. 

message: In Mechanism, second paragraph, second to last line, shouldn't it be "dominant manner"? 5.179.128.28 (talk) 15:15, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  LOF mutations of haploinsufficient genes are inherited in a dominant manner 

message: I moved the following segment to here, because it seems contradictory in stating that the phenotype in haploinsufficiency would be inherited in a recessive manner. Logically, it would be inherited in a dominant manner, because the unaffected, wild, type allele would not be able to compensate. Mikael Häggström (talk) 14:13, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved segment to here
Talk:Loisaida

message: Can someone help me pronounce this term? My guess is "LO-EES-EYE-DAH". Can anyone comfirm that for me? Hanako 14:42, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Pretty much. I've also heard it pronounced more like "LO-EES-EYE-EE-DAH". I don't know which is more correct. Do we have a Nuyorican on Wikipedia who might give us something more definitive? - Jmabel | Talk 18:31, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Thank you Jmabel and Tony the Marine, you guys rock! Hanako 20:30, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciation

message: Sentences like "Now, with crime rates down, the area is a hipster mecca and is quickly becoming further gentrified." do not carry an academic of professional tone and should be rewritten.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lietkynes65 (talk • contribs) 20:05, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Unprofessional Tone

message: not relevant enough to warrant having its own major section in the article.
Lucky dog (talk) 23:26, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  get rid of the loisada cocktail recipe
Talk:Regina High School (Ohio)

message: Does anyone know if the sign language that the Clown Ministry uses is American Sign Language or not? It could be some other form of sign language, but that's most probably it. I will refrain from changing the wikilink until I am sure, though. Jacqui★ 14:43, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Pitt (character)

message: I am not understanding how this article is set up. Can anybody give me any hints?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by little_tinyfish (talk • contribs) 
:what do you mean? †Bloodpack† 05:43, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What are all of those numbers in the biography in reference to? Little tinyfish 13:39, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: i dunno, probably these are the number of issues the event happened as stated in the biography †Bloodpack† 06:15, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually it looks like someone's well-meaning but badly executed attempts to insert footnoting into the article.  Without knowing how to do REF tags.  I'll try to take some time to fix this, but since there's two sets of numbers it's hard to tell what's going on here.  Ford MF 14:54, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I didnt see it listed but i have an ashcan pitt edition that came in a wizard i believe  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.210.195.215 (talk) 06:34, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  pitt
Talk:Grand Prince of Moscow

message: Shouldn't this read: "of Muscovy"? Dahn 15:00, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope. There is no such term in Russian. --Ghirla -трёп- 16:01, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: But there is such a term on wikipedia - standing as common reference for the Grand Duchy of Moscow. What am I not getting here? Dahn 16:07, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Old talk
Talk:Andreev reflection

message: This article would profit a lot from a nice figure I think. If anybody with artistic talent reads this, please add one to the page. I imagine a picture of an NS-interface with trajectories of electron, hole and maybe an indication of the superconducting density of states or the gap.
What is still missing are maybe some formulae for transmission/reflection amplitudes. And of course everything could be explained more understandably. Bamse 15:23, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

message: The spin of the hole is opposite to the electron; I've corrected this in the text, but the figure still needs correction Brienanni 19:17, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think that is correct. In order to form a Cooper pair we need two electrons with opposite spin. One of the electrons is the incoming electron with spin up (see figure). The second electron (with spin down) is taken from the left side and appears as a hole. This hole is thus a missing spin-down electron, and has effectively spin-up! Bamse 15:25, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

text: Thank you. Now it is very clear. As for the figure, I contact the artist. Or maybe it is better to omit spin at all in the figure and have a different angle of incidence instead-could be interesting. Bamse 01:40, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

text: I've updated the illustration to flip the spin of the hole and to adjust the incidence angle.  I agree that the issue of the spin of the hole is confusing either way; nominally the hole must of course have the same spin as the incoming electron, in order to conserve total spin, but this obscures the fact that it occupies a different spin band.  Incidentally, the issue could be easier to explain if we had a proper article behind that link; I'll leave its creation to someone who actually knows something about physics.  (We do, it turns out, have an article on "Spin (band)", but that's not quite the same thing...)  —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 06:59, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

text: I agree, multiple Andreev reflections, subharmonic gap structure, etc all belong here.bamse (talk) 21:28, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Spin of the hole
Talk:Hewett, Wisconsin

message: Hewitt is a town in Clark County, Wisconsin. It is a basic unit of governement in the state of Wisconsin. Why is it being speedily deleted is something is something I can not figure out. I hope the editor requesting the speedy deletion would please explain why he wants this article speedily deleted in the first place. Thank you-RFD (talk) 20:02, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:AFD

message: There are the most general rules  :wikipedia:Verifiability,  Wikipedia:No original research and  their consequences: Wikipedia:Citing sources and Wikipedia:Reliable sources. You cannot add an abbreviation just because your buddy likes to use it in e-mails to you. The usage must be well-established and described in reputable sources.  
While I am here, there is anothyer common brand of inclusionism: an article, say, Leaf (disambiguation) should not include all possible phrases that include the word "Leaf" however useful it might be; e.g., I will not add Maple Leaf Rag into it however I like the tune. (this comment is pertaining to the case of virii here).  `'mikka (t) 19:52, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclusionism vs. exclusionism 

message: Guys, perhaps those in favour of adding to this dab page would like to take part in a discussion here, rather than in edit summaries? Lets keep the page stable and get consensus behind one version or the other... Thanks/wangi 20:27, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Here we go again... 

message: Why don't those people who wish to remove items from this page answer one very simple question for me: Why? How are they harmful, how do they make this page worse, and why should they not be here? Don't tell me "because the MoS says so"; that's a bullshit answer. I want to know, in explict detail, why editors want to make this page less useful.--SB | T 09:30, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I counted 6 fairly random questions, call them "one very simple question" if you like. But all of your questions, at least the ones that made sense, have been answered already on this talk page - the minority opinion which you represent has basically got its way through agressive reverting. Don't pretend that you're interested in discussion. Zargulon 10:41, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  A simple query 

message: I removed the entry per MOS:DABACRO. Widefox; talk 20:14, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  April Fool's Day 

message: Not sure why this was removed - certainly I find it useful to get to the WP:AfD page.Peter Rehse (talk) 21:13, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I used it the same way.  I restored it after discussing it with the editor that removed it. TimTempleton (talk) (cont) 23:35, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

text: Was removed again (21 Feb, 2024), I have undone the change as I also use it quite often Mr Vili talk 11:53, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Article for Deletion
Talk:Strings (Unix)

message: There should really be some mention of the use of strings to find things in programs which hadn't been meant to be left in there. This is a reasonably common use of the program in reverse-engineering and so on. Chris Cunningham 15:24, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If that is so, then I guess someone will have to add it sometime. Because I don't know so much about using it in such a way. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Frap (talk • contribs) 16:34, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Mostly everything can be disputed ...
most or all "facts" (works on object files, ends strings with NUL, configurable printables, is part of Gnu ...) apply to one implementation or another, and these are intermixed.
JöG (talk) 20:48, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problems with this article
Talk:Volvo trucks

message: This article link-lists a bunch of Volvo models with no articles. I don't know much about each model, especially not in english, but would it be too little to just post a picture of the model to start with? ...It's said that a picture says more than a thousand words? G®iffen 15:31, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: All the not-written articles
Talk:Dough scraper

message: I feel as if "bench scraper" is less frequently used as a term for this iterm than "dough scraper."  Google gives "dough scraper" 25,700 hits and "bench scraper" 16,200 hits.  Amazon lists 21 for "dough scraper" and only 3 for "bench scraper."  I will move the main page for this information to "dough scraper" unless there are any objections.--Nleamy 22:07, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Jan Akkerman

message: In the present (18-01-2021) text Akkerman is said to have attended the Amsterdam Music Lyceum. This never happened. Akkerman did study with a private teacher in his childhood years and attended the Schröder Institute in his teens, a music academy, but did not finish it. Since his teens he has been a professional musician. First professional band was the Friendship Sextet when he was 12. For details, check his biography by David Randall, In and out of focus: the music of Jan Akkerman and Focus. --Hansung02 (talk) 20:52, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amsterdam Music Lyceum 

message: Bert Ruiter is mentioned (18-01-2021) as co-founding member of Dutch band Brainbox. This is nonsense. Ruiter never had anything to do with Brainbox, he played in Focus and later in Earth & Fire where his wife Jerney Kaagman was the singer. I deleted his name and replaced it with André Reijnen, the original bassplayer of Brainbox. --Hansung02 (talk) 21:47, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brainbox
Talk:Cornwall (territorial duchy)

message: Is there a reason why we have two pages that talk about the duchy of Cornwall  here and here?  Although the name suggests that they cover different faces of the Duchy of Cornwall (as a property holding of Prince Charles, and as a once semi autonomous block of the UK) in reality they cover mostly the same information - wouldn't it be better for readers unfamiliar with this information to merge the two articles?  At the moment it just looks like a potential POV fork waiting to happen Mammal4 15:37, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Would it not make more sense to segregate the two diametrically opposed views of the Cornish Duchy so that the territorial aspects of this unique entity may be fully presented and examined, with, hopefully, the inclusion of primary source material for reference and context? -- TGG 23:44, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Two pages for the duchy

message: I removed the statement regarding the foreshore case because it was inaccurate and misleading. Firstly, it was a abitration not a court case and secondly, the case was about mining rights in Cornwall and had nothing to do with territorial rights (and the final decision was a comprimise anyway so noone succesfully argued anything). josh (talk) 19:28, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Whilst the Foreshore Case was, in fact, an arbitration it was set up as such to avoid the need for a court case yet still facilitate enacting an Act of Parliament.  The Crown set the terms of reference for the arbitration and, accordingly, the Award was based on the presentation of legal argument supported by legal documents, statutes etc., by both the Crown and the Duchy.  The Case was principally about ownership of the Foreshore (not mining rights) - and, therefore, Territorial! - to see whether the Crown had its usual prima facie right to this property within the Duchy.  Therefore NOT a compromise!  From the evidence submitted by the Officers of the Duchy, it is possible (even probable), that the Crown would not have been awarded the land below low-water mark - had it gone through the public legal route. -- TGG 00:09, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious statement 

message: Added this as it seemed of relevence:
In addition some government bodies such as the the Treasury Solicitors agency for Bona Vicantia Divison consider The Duchy of Cornwall to comprise the County of CornwallBona Vacantia - See Jusrisdiction.
Bretagne 44 21:23, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bona Vacantia Website
Talk:Kitchener line

message: Hello! Link [8] appears to be broken. I searched for its replacement, however I realized that the government financed 2009 Environmental Study Report (later cited) implies, in itself, that there is interest from GO.  However, there is no hint in the study that I could find saying that service coud "start as early as 2011". Would it be appropriate to remove that 2011 speculation and link that earlier statement's citation to to the 2009 study? Thanks in advance for the feedback! Rååån (talk) 00:56, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extension Westward
Talk:Lakeshore East line

message: In the downtown TO area the GO trains run on the former CN/CP lines. At some point outside the downtown area the service switches to dedicated lines. I'm curious where this happens, and when the various portions of the lines were built. I assume, for instance, that the Danforth GO Station is located on land originally intended for the Scarborough Expressway, but I'm not sure if the rail lines along that corridor were there before the Expressway, or after.
Can someone help out here?
Maury Markowitz (talk) 18:50, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What rails? 

message: Metrolinx has changed the names of the proposed stations along the Bowmanville extension. The following table gives the 2011 and 2023 station names. I plan to rename three of the four following articles to reflect the 2023 station names, and then change article contents. I am drafting changes for the four station articles offline, and won't do the renaming until the drafts are ready to go. Changes would also be needed to Template:GO Transit and Lakeshore East line. Are there any other articles or templates that would need change? TheTrolleyPole (talk) 01:59, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: To clarify, some of the stations weren't just renamed, they are also in different locations but I still support these moves. However, the Riston station is usually labled as "Riston Road" and so Ritson Road GO Station should be the article title. BLAIXX 03:48, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The Metrolinx exhibits are inconsistant. The project page says "Ritson Road" while the PIC presentation and Key Componants document omit the word "Road". However, if you feel more comfortable with "Ritson Road", then that is what the article name will include. TheTrolleyPole (talk) 18:32, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds good. Once you perform the moves, Template:GO Transit Lakeshore East is another to be edited. BLAIXX 22:42, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I find that only Thornton's Corners East GO Station is in a relocated position. I compared 2023 project maps to the infobox coordinates. TheTrolleyPole (talk) 00:29, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

text: Renaming done plus many updates to station article text. TheTrolleyPole (talk) 02:17, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bowmanville extension station names