lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Sound reproduction

message: Should there be a separate article for sound or audio storage? I mean, aren't CD's and MD's more like storage medias? But then again, if there's no reproduction techinque then there's no use of audio storage. And another question, should we speak about audio or sound reproduction/storage?  --User:tbackstr
:Yes, I think there is much work to do to bring the whole topic together. See my comments below regarding your valid point that recording and reproduction need to be considered together. Note that I have just created a new Root page, reflected in the new navigational template --Lindosland 14:46, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

message: This page seems to me to be an excellent example of the need for better coordinated editing on Wikipedia, something I have been trying to promote at Wikipedia:Root page. Firstly, I suggest one might expect the title 'Sound recording' to be accessed by people expecting to find out primarily about the modern technology, not work their way through the history of the phonograph (important though this is). Secondly, there is not even a link on the page to Sound reproduction which would seem to be an intimate part of the whole idea! And until I put one there there was no link to this page from Sound reproduction. Then the opening sentence is a little odd, using bold in two places.
I've been attempting to pull together the whole subject, using Root page principles, and have put templates on many pages to promote easy navigation and awareness by editors of how the whole subject is being  covered. So far this uses Sound reproduction as the Root page with Hubs for various aspects. But Sound reproduction had nothing on it but some links (until I added a paragraph).
I suggest that a new page Sound recording and reproduction would be better as a starting point or Root page, with a Hub page called Sound recording that leads to studio technology etc. This page is an excellent History of sound recording and should be renamed as such, with perhaps some parts copied over to the new Root page. Redirects would bring various things like Sound recording to the Root page. Any objections? I may start the process by creating the new root page (since this does not currently exist), with template, to show how it will work. I feel that with the templates in place many more people will find the pages that they want, and it will be easy for editors to see how the land lies so far. --Lindosland 14:19, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments copied from 'History of sound  recording'
Talk:São Paulo (disambiguation)

message: All the recent changes to the São Paulo disambiguation page have been pointless. They deviate the article from its main reason for existing, which is to help people finding the article they're looking for. Someone started adding a lot of into to it (info that in fact can be found on the other São Paulo pages), which only makes things harder for people. They'll have a lot of trouble finding the links, which is why they are there. Someone also signed the article. That is not appropriate for an encyclopedia.
I'm reverting all those changes. The way it is now looks much simpler and helpful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mackeriv (talk • contribs) 02:19, 15 June 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverting...
Talk:Joel Marangella

message: Looking at the history of this article, i realized that this article was intended for Joel Bray Marangella (Check history, 2006 version). Due to the lack of sources, the content was challenged and removed over the years. The 2006 version is almost correct. I agree that the article has some POV issues and missing sources. I would like to rewrite this article and remove the present content that is not at all related to him.Serv181920 (talk) 09:00, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restoring the article that has been completely changed over a period of time. 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Not moved (non-admin closure)  BegbertBiggs (talk) 19:45, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Joel Marangella →  – This article was intended for Joel Bray Marangella. Check 2006 version of this article. Over a period of time the unsourced content was challenged and removed and the article was taken by someone else with a similar name. Serv181920 (talk) 09:12, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

text: This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 09:50, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: *But also edits of page Joel Bray Marangella 08:53, 8 December 2020 and 08:42, 8 December 2020 by User:Serv181920 (info by Anthony Appleyard (talk) 17:01, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

text: Ok, Noted. Thanks.Serv181920 (talk) 07:14, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 8 December 2020
Wikipedia talk:PHP script automatic wikification

message: Multiple links from that very article to the same page are removed; only the first of these links stays
:Magnus, I don't think I like this. In longer articles, it can be very helpful to have a second link later on, so the reader doesn't have to go scurrying back up the page until she finds the first one. And, of course, this could hurt talk pages something fierce! Brion VIBBER, Monday, April 8, 2002
::You're right. I'll take it out tonight. Actually, the reason I put this in was one of 24's articles, where s/he was linking to the same article 3 or 4 times, within the first few paragraphs, each time with a different link title. --Magnus Manske, Tuesday, April 9, 2002
----
When is this going to go live? -- Timwi 20:32 17 Jun 2003 (UTC)
: I second that - it sounds like a very useful feature. Nanobug 21:06, 19 Sep 2003 (UTC)
Talk:Land Rover

message: The article says "their most distinctive feature has been their bodies, constructed of a lightweight proprietary alloy of aluminium and magnesium called Birmabright (being rustproof, this contributes to the vehicle's longevity)", but aren't they nowdays made of orinary steel? // Liftarn
:I believe Series / Defender models have always been aluminum-bodied.  I don't think all other models have been.  Experts? —Morven 20:47, Oct 27, 2004 (UTC)
The Defender is still made with an aluminium body with external rivets. The Defender is no longer sold in the US, its still however available in the  UK, Australia, South Africa and other territories. The Disco, Freelander and Range Rover are of a conventional pressed steel construction--Nick-in-South-Africa 05:53, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birmabright? 

message: In the Clubs section, add to the end of the sixth paragraph...
Other than ALRC and the short lived Association of North American Rover Clubs (ANARC), which was created 1998 to celebrate Land Rover's 50th anniversary and disbanded in 2001, other groups of Land Rover clubs have affiliated with each other. In 2022, ANARChttps://www.anarc.club/  was reformed as a non profit to promote fellowship among Land Rover Clubs, owners, and enthusiasts in North America and to celebrate the 75th anniversary of Land Roverwww.landrover75.com. John Kostuch (talk) 02:49, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: please provide reliable secondary sources to support the requested addition. 𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛   𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜 12:00, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 12 June 2023
Talk:Gold standard

message: Let's be sure we maintain a neutral point of view. This topic is once again a political issue. There's a bill in play in the US House of Representatives to re-establish the gold standard (H.R. 9157). Same guy tried the same thing in 2019 (H.R. 2558). And then there was Senator Ron Paul years ago. Cordially, BuzzWeiser196 (talk) 14:41, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: New Bill Introduced to Bring the US Back to the Gold Standard. BuzzWeiser196 (talk) 14:56, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Political issue 

message: Hello! I don't see any mention in this article about current advocate of the gold standard Keith Weiner and his company Monetary Metals which pays a yield on gold, paid in gold, in an attempt to give individuals and institutions a way to start their own personal gold standard. Should this be noted on this page as the most recent attempt by a private company to restart a gold based ecosystem? The first Gold Bond in 87 years would be noteworthy for this page I would think? Gold good (talk) 22:10, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reignition of Gold Standard 

message: Minor edit (grammar), under section Great Depression, change "... Central European banking crisis led Germany and Austria suspend gold convertibility and impose exchange controls."
to
"... Central European banking crisis led Germany and Austria to suspend gold convertibility and impose exchange controls." Anodeunheard (talk) 18:09, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: - FlightTime (open channel) 18:27, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 12 July 2023
Talk:Lime

message: Query - should the Lime page be a crosslink page sending users to Lime (cooking) and Lime (industrial)? ATM Lime the plant is on this page and another entry needs to be created for Lime the chemical (calcium carbonate).
: This is now done.  Does anyone know what type of lime Aphrodite is associated with? ( 13:33 5 Jul 2003 (UTC)
::No, but I'd guess it's the Tilia. The citrus fruit was unknown to the Ancient Greeks. --Angr/ 13:21, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: That's correct - it is the tree. --138.38.32.84 18:03, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Links

message: With regards to the pH value of lime, this is rather confusing as lime as a fruit is sourish (hence lower pH value), whereas lime as a agricultural tool is alkaline (higher pH value). Could anyone kindly highlight the history behind why two different substances having different pH value can share the same name? I was considering that a small kid, overhearing his or her parents mentioning that they should add lime to neutralise the acidity in their garden would take lime as fruit and start squeezing the lime juice into the garden. This would really worsen the soil acidity. :)
218.186.8.11 03:12, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:   one is old english, one from spanish.82.35.115.3 (talk) 20:53, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Acid / alkali

message: What about that white scaley stuff that forms around sink fixtures.  That stuff is called "lime" - but I see no reference to it here.  Rklawton (talk) 22:14, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Plumbing

message: There is a discussion at Talk:Limes#Requested move 21 March 2020 about moving an article about a frontier and redirecting the plural here. Crouch, Swale (talk)  17:51, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The above link does not lead to a discussion. And I also could not find any discusion elswhere. This merge is/was compleatly unnessesary and not helfull.--Fano (talk) 08:23, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

text: The above link should have been fixed to link to Talk:Limes_(Roman_Empire)#Requested_move_21_March_2020. Which is absolutly fine as this was the consesnsus to create the disambigues page. --Fano (talk) 08:30, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Limes" 

message: I bold moved this redundant dabpage and was reverted.  Opening for discussion. 162 etc. (talk) 03:57, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I think these should indeed remain separate since Limes (Roman Empire) and Limes (magazine) are not the plural of lime. There's no need to duplicate the singlular lime entries on the Limes page though, the Lime (disambiguation) link under See also should suffice. Lennart97 (talk) 20:11, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Agreed, a single link from singular to plural here should be quite clear enough. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 09:20, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging [[Limes]]
Talk:Sigismund Báthory

message: Why "diet of Kolozsvár" and not "diet of Cluj-Napoca" since the name of the city in Romanian is Cluj-Napoca?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dicocodino (talk • contribs) 23:47, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Because Cluj-Napoca is a modern day name adopted under Ceausescu. Learns some history, son.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.2.85.95 (talk) 00:25, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Cluj-Napoca

message: There seems to be some inconsistency in the article about his date of death. The lead sentence, infobox (at the top of the article), and "succession box" (at the bottom) all say it was 27 March 1613, while the "Last years" section claims 13 March 1613, apparently sourced from an encyclopedia entry. Unfortunately, I have been unable to verify this using Google Books (I can only search "blindly" in the text, not read full pages). OTOH, I have found the March 27th date in a different source. Can anyone verify that the cited source (from the article) actually contains the March 13th date? - dcljr (talk) 22:58, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. 27 March is the correct date. I fixed it. Borsoka (talk) 03:01, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  OK, Borsoka, but you changed the date without changing the citation. Are you sure the source supports that date? (I cannot see more than small snippets of text from that work at Google Books.) - dcljr (talk) 03:19, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes, I am sure. Borsoka (talk) 03:21, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of death 

message: I added a 1595 engraving of Sigismund in full regalia. It is of particular historical importance since he is using the triple princely title (as overlord of Moldavia and Wallachia). In any case it is more martial and might replace the portrait previously used on some other pages and lists. I would also appreciate if someone took the time to publish this on hu.wiki. Plinul cel tanar (talk) 19:32, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Portrait in full regalia
Talk:Albrecht Giese

message: According to his son's wikipedia page, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georg_Giese , the son pre-dates him and was also portrayed as an adult in a painting that I believe is dated to 1532, at which time Albrecht would have been a child supposedly?   (talk) 02:12, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chronological issues concerning his son
Talk:Software development process

message: I don't feel comfortable calling Agile, Waterfall and even Spiral a "methodology". These approaches of software development are rather frameworks or models than methodologies. Agile makes that particularly clear: It provides a number of values, philosophies and principles, and advocates certain development approaches, but nonetheless doesn't prescribe (or dictate) them in a way that a methodology such as Scrum does. If there are no objections, I'd like to change that in the article. – invenio tc 05:57, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Agile, Waterfall, Spiral – Frameworks or Models rather than Methodologies 

message: Isn't there too much overlap with Software development?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.181.12.28 (talk) 07:27, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content overlap 

message: My edit summary was incorrect, but this is about software development, which is not a compound word. A discussion should be undertaken before assumptions like this are made again. Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:29, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Software development is not a compound word 

message: The following paragraph describes extreme programming as "other than agile", but extreme programming is widely (also according to Wikipedia) regarded as a type of agile software development.
"Most modern development processes can be vaguely described as agile. Other methodologies include waterfall, prototyping, iterative and incremental development, spiral development, rapid application development, and extreme programming." Olaeld (talk) 08:59, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extreme programming "other than agile"?
Talk:Israeli settlement

message: My understanding is that the settlements in Gaza had a huge effect on the economy for the years that they were there. It's probably worth while to have a section dedicated to the now removed settlements. Any issue with putting taht under "History" with the subsection title "Gaza Strip settlements"? DMH43 (talk) 19:51, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Please be more specific and mention possible sources. "Had a huge effect on the economy" is too vague, and context matters as well (how is "economy" measured here?). TucanHolmes (talk) 16:54, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added a section under 'history' DMH43 (talk) 16:59, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion on Gaza settlements 

message: Can you please remove the source for the claim that Israeli withdrawl from Gaza was "More than compensated by transfers to the West Bank", and replace it with another? The source provided makes no mention of the issue.
If another source cannot be found, maybe the sentence should be removed, but I'd trust your discretion on that issue.
I'd suggest a source myself, but I was unable to find one which adequately supports that claim. Mr manor11 (talk) 17:16, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 15 May 2024 

message: Location of correction: 3rd paragraph, 3rd sentence. Change "In total, over 450,000 Israeli settlers residing in the West Bank..." to "In total, over 450,000 Israeli settlers reside in the..." by changing the word "residing" to "reside". Goman1 (talk) 23:45, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: . Rkieferbaum (talk) 02:30, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 23 May 2024
Talk:Set (mathematics)

message: Can we move the history section to the end of the article?  The history section is somewhat advanced (mentioning classes, Russell's paradox, axioms of set theory), whereas the next few sections on the basic notation and concepts of set theory are more helpful for 99% of readers, I think. Ebony Jackson (talk) 02:31, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you, . By far the worst thing about Wikipedia's coverage of mathematical topics is that many of the articles are written largely by mathematicians who write as though for other mathematicians, often producing results which are incomprehensible to most ordinary readers of the encyclopaedia. It is refreshing to see someone making an attempt to reduce the extent of this problem. 👍 JBW (talk) 10:16, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

text: Yes, moving the history section to the end of the article, as you have now done, is a big improvement. Paul August ☎ 12:46, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: I was once chastised for thinking a set could contain duplicated elements, e.g. something like {2,2,3}.
Those elements are the prime factorization of 12, and if it makes sense for them to be a set, that would be useful.
E.g., the least common denominator of two integers is simply (the product of the elements of) the intersection of their prime factorization "sets",
and the product of two integers is (the product of the elements of) the union of their prime factorization "sets".
Can that be salvaged in any way?
BMJ-pdx (talk) 03:46, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: See Multiset. D.Lazard (talk) 07:49, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-distinct elements
Talk:Circuit Paul Ricard

message: Removed this stuff from the article... couldn't see what it has to do with Paul Ricard! Enchanter —Preceding undated comment added 15:31, 9 April 2002 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of irrelevant material

message: I added a link to the official site, which has much more information than is contained here about the track and its history.  I'm too lazy to update the entry myself, but I think it should be done :)  Mactenchi 18:43, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expand using official site 

message: Please stop redirecting Paul Ricard here.Zigzig20s 08:04, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  redirect 

message: The correct name of this venue is Circuit Paul Ricard. This page should be moved to that title and this one made to a redirect. Twirly Pen (Speak up) 12:57, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Resolved. Twirly Pen (Speak up) 21:20, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect title 
Talk:Pennsylvania Avenue

message: Here is a very good article that needs the information sifted out of it and made unplagiarised so it can be included in the page:
[from - http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/today/may23.html]
:It appears that this is all a product of the Library of Congress, which as an arm of the Federal Government makes this a public domain work. As such, it can be directly incorporated into the article, though common courtesy requires us to include a note acknowledging the LOC.  --Polynova 22:08, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I have now incorporated much of the LOC article into this one. I think the article is the best "street" article in Wikipedia. Take that Broadway and Wall Street! --Polynova 06:13, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)

text: I have to disagree. The Andrew Jackson story may be a myth, but the White House is very clearly along the PA Ave axis as seen in any map of DC or satellite photo. --dm (talk) 19:00, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article should be merged here because it is very short and can be efficiently described in the history section. Dough4872 (talk) 18:53, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging [[District of Columbia Route 4]]

message: I just heard a brief comment on NBC News that when President Kennedy travelled from the Capitol to the White House, he was distressed to see how rundown the neighborhood had become and then appointed Daniel Patrick Moynihan to work on renewal. It would be helpful if this article made some mention of this.
--Regensturm23 (talk) 20:55, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renewal under Kennedy 

message: The article contains several contradictions: PA is both PA and "Southern Maryland Boulevard" (and several other "street names"). What is the definition of PA, if it's not the name? - 91.10.4.162 (talk) 00:47, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems fine to me. In fact, you appear to be the only person who's having difficulty understanding the article. Maybe you could clarify just what it is you are having such a hard time with? We'll try to help you out if we can... - theWOLFchild 02:25, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Let's try something else: Stop wikihounding me, or at least try to be civil and open-minded, then we could start the conversation. - 91.10.4.162 (talk) 02:49, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Identity 

message: On google I have found  Capitol Hill, First St SE, Washington, DC 20004.
Is there a numerical address?  Are there several such addresses?
Thank You,
Dhsert (talk) 19:00, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Capitol Hill is a neighborhood, not a single building, so there is no numerical address, nor is there just one street that is identified with it. As the Capitol Hill article notes, the neighborhood is roughly bounded by Virginia Ave. SE., S. Capitol St., G St. NE, 14th Sts. SE & NE, 8th St. NE, I-295, M St. SE, and 11th St. SE ... Carter (talk) 01:25, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitol Hill
Talk:The Wheel of Time

message: Sorry, I’m not a practiced editor. Apparently TEotW is #1 on the NYT audio bestseller list, as well as placing on the the NYT mass market list and the USA Today list. 2600:1702:1D70:1EF0:E03D:6A41:6DDE:FCFF (talk) 18:45, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  TEotW now on bestseller lists.