lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of American League pennant winners

message: I changed Boston team name from the Pilgrims to the 'Americans'.
Research has shown the name 'Boston Pilgrims' was not used in the early 1900s, and was invented sometime after the fact.  See Boston Red Sox for links to the research of papers of the day.  The team was simply known as 'Boston' or the 'Boston Americans' (to distinguish from the NL Boston team).  The team was named the Red Sox before the 1908 season.
Econrad 16:18, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Boston Pigrims

message: Any particular reason we're using "Los Angeles Angels" to describe the team from Anaheim in the 2000's?  Shouldn't we use the full name of "Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim"?  I normally am very much the take charge/be bold-type and wjust change it, but since it's up for FA status, I don't wanna start an edit war over something that, while I see it should be fixed, is trite in the whole aspect of the project. EaglesPhilliesFanInTampa 20:56, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I see your point, but the team's website calls them the long-form, as well as Fox Sports, NBC Sports, and Baseball-Reference.com, in addition to other sources, I'm sure.  That being said, I'll let the group decide, because once again, I don't want to screw up something others have been working hard over my issues with it.  (Oh, and you're welcome about the Bosox thing; I just noticed the Yanks messed up, too, and am going to correct that in a sec. ;-) ) EaglesPhilliesFanInTampa 20:39, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: *Apologies about the mismarkings. I copied the skeleton from the NL version of this list to build off of, there may be some accidental holdovers. Staxringold talkcontribs 20:55, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: LOL, no worries!  We're all human; I'm just glad I could find them before the final verdict.  And I'm thinking I'm going to change and note, since the committee doing the FL could probably want the full and real name instead.  Let me know if something changes! EaglesPhilliesFanInTampa 13:51, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  LAA - which name is correct? 

message: I was bold and changed to 'light red background', for the winners on this list. Seeing as the 'light blue background' is used for the winners at the List of National League pennant winners page. GoodDay (talk) 22:17, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Style change: Winner's background colour
Talk:Waverly, Pennsylvania

message: :It is the home of Doc's Deli, a five star restaurant which serves some of the best foie gras and grilled cheese sandwiches on the East Coast. Doc?s Deli is rumored to be a portal for time travel after its basement was rented out by a group of scientists funded by the Wellington Syndicate. Patrons can go there and dine with many illustrious figures from throughout the span of time, including Socrates, Plato, John Hart Hunter, Charles Cole, and Kent Beatty.
:Doc's Deli was the site of the Third Kinderhook Conference, at which Mackenzie King and Harry S. Truman discussed the humanitarian relief aid to Vietnam, a covert diplomatic mission that shifted foreign policy influence away from Adlai Stevenson.
I've removed this text from the article, but it keeps reappearing. The first part is advertising (and probably incorrect: I've found only very few hits to Doc's Deli in Waverly, much less that you would expect for a 'five star restaurant'). The rest is just... let's just say I don't believe a word of it. Eugene van der Pijll 16:24, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: I propose merging the article concerning Waverly with the article concerning Abington Township, due to the impending name change to Waverly Township as approved by the voters. In addition, the merged article would be named "Waverly Township, Pennsylvania," as this is the more "official" name and because of the likelihood of this being used in postal addresses in the near future.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.114.92.143 (talk) 12:32, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge this article with township article 

message: This article has been merged with that of Waverly Township. As the entire township is less than 5 square miles in area (i.e., you could fit over 7 Waverly Townships into a typical 36-square-mile Midwestern township), the village of Waverly forms such a substantial portion of the township that segregating information into different articles will leave potential readers more confused than not. I have also found no evidence that the village was ever considered a separate CDP by the census bureau. In addition, considering the entirety of the township was at one time a borough, this suggests that the inhabitants had felt that the bounds of the "village" and the municipality were roughly the same geographically.
If there are any further objections to the merger, please post here before re-un-merging. Mac3387 (talk) 22:31, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Kindly observe that we never do this.  Throughout the United States, we maintain separate articles on unincorporated communities: there's no good reason to depart from standard practice with this specific article.  Nyttend (talk) 14:53, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article has been merged with township article
Talk:Grand Royal

message: Hello Wikipedia,regarding your posting at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Royal there is a copyright problem with the content submitted to your Encyclopedia.  This content has been submitted by request of Grand Royal, the now defunct label of Beastie Boys.  I maintain the Grand Royal online archives and asked the article writer, C. Claessens, to add the submitted content to Wikipedia.  Now he reported about your copyright issues which made me writing this >Talk page< to you.Please detail your questions regarding copyright issues with the content submitted.Kind regards,Danny Trommerc/o The Beastie Museumgrandroyal@sirdan.com | +49 345 6819402 | http://www.grandroyal.com
:Danny Trommer spoke to me on the phone a few minutes ago to point out this situation, and as a result I have reverted the page to the version with the Grand Royal press release on. As Danny says, he maintains the online archives of Grand Royal and believes that this material is OK to use on Wikipedia. I have reverted the article so that Danny Trommer and his collaborator can continue to develop it. --rbrwr± 19:10, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why exactly was Grans Royal Records moved to Grand Royal? Except 1 sentece over the magazine it still is completely about Grand Royal Records. warpozio 21:05, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Why move?

message: EPMD used the phrase "Grand Royal" at least twice on the album Unfinished Business. The Beasties probably took a liking to the phrase having heard it there. BBoys sample EPMD often, including tracks from Unfinished Business  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.208.189.127 (talk) 04:17, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: EPMD inspired?
Talk:SD card

message: Card Specific Data deserves its own section in my opinion. All related matters like declared capacity may reside there.
Siavoshkc (talk) 06:28, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate CSD Section 

message: It is said in the article, that
"There is a proprietary UHS-I extension, called DDR200, originally created by SanDisk that increases transfer speed further to 170 MB/s. Unlike UHS-II, it does not use additional pins. It achieves this by using the 208 MHz frequency of the standard SDR104 mode, but using DDR transfers. This extension has since then been used by Lexar for their 1066x series (160 MB/s), Kingston Canvas Go Plus (170 MB/s) and the MyMemory PRO SD card (180 MB/s)."
There are also UHS-I microSD cards from Samsung (EVO Plus, Pro Plus, Pro Ultimate) which achieve speeds above 104 MB/s but are probably not compatible with the DDR200 specification. Such speeds are achievable only on Samsung readers (included with the card), and not on regular DDR200 readers (like Kingston MobileLitePlus). 83.242.66.85 (talk) 11:31, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  UHS-I DDR200 Controller 

message: The "History" section of this article is useless garbage, because it persistantly references terms and acronyms which are not defined until much later in the article.  The article should be reformatted to move history to the end, so that the reader knows what the different terms mean.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:589:300:C7C0:21A1:13AE:687F:5058 (talk) 20:03, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad article format 

message: The statement "Without they are guaranteed to at least reach A1 speeds", in the 16:11, 25 April 2024‎, version (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=SD_card&oldid=1220735921) of this article, doesn't make sense. The statement is found under the Speed section (section 3), Class subsection (subsection 3.2), "Application Performance Class" sub-subsection. Did the author/editor perhaps mean to write something like "Without host driver support, A2 cards are guaranteed to at least reach A1 speeds"?   Mercy11 (talk) 10:05, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Incomplete, or bad English syntax statement?
Talk:Tom and Jerry

message: Specifically, the following sentence is inaccurate: "Despite their endless attacks on one another, [Tom and Jerry] have saved each other's lives every time they were truly in danger" except in The Two Mouseketeers and Blue Cat Blues. I can think of three more shorts like The Two Mouseketeers where Tom dies at the end with no attempt by Jerry to try to save him. For example, in The Yankee Doodle Mouse, Jerry not only fails to save Tom but actually facilitates his death by tying Tom to rocket and watching him explode into fireworks. Tom meets a similar demise at the end of Safety Second. Finally, in Mouse Trouble, Tom ends up exploding himself and is seen floating in a cloud as an angel. 
There might be more examples from the original run that I'm forgetting, but with 4 cartoons ending with Tom's death and 1 with Tom and Jerry both committing suicide (Blue Cat Blues), I think it's difficult to make the claim that they "saved each other's lives every time." I would suggest either adding in the 3 more exceptions I listed, or honestly just delete the sentence altogether because it's weird to make a sweeping claim about Tom and Jerry, only to qualify it with 5 exceptions to the rule. 69.42.5.192 (talk) 11:48, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong info under the "plot" section 

message: The redirect T&J has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Okmrman (talk) 03:44, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:T&J]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Order of the Sons of Italy

message: Gosh this page reads like a publicity piece! Let me at least wikify some links. (How can an Italian-American group be culturally diverse? North and South Italians? What does OSIA stand for?)  Paul, in Saudi 03:12, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: {{tl|POV}}

message: *support merge --evrik 02:24, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:The Dreaming (album)

message: *All song titles serve as redirects to this album, have their own pages, or have been placed at the appropriate disambiguation pages.--Hraefen Talk 18:01, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Uh....what? Stev0 19:54, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: '''<^>v!!This album is connected!!v<^>'''

message: This is clearly a New Wave Album, Never Forever was already new wave influenced and her stage shows in the Tour of Life - a bit Klaus Nomi, whose death she also refers in an interview.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.141.224.47 (talk) 11:55, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Wave 

message: So how can an album that was being recorded in May 1982 be released in February 1982? See . Mark in wiki (talk) 19:59, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: According to  table it was released on 13 September and in chapter Release and commercial performance it is staed that it was released on 1 September? Bullenwächter (talk) 20:24, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release date
Wikipedia talk:List of Wikipedians by number of most recent edits

message: I'm listing this on WP:PNA because the data is so old.  PedanticallySpeaking 17:29, Nov 11, 2004 (UTC)
:Hmm. Nobody's maintaining this. It would be interesting if there was an automated system to keep track of this. I know from my watchlist that I have many most recent edits at the moment, and actually at any given moment, and that's not counting redirects. Speaking of which, I've been going through User:Tucci528's contributions ( is an old account belonging to ), and so far I've tracked down 47 of this User's most recent edits, and they are all redirects (such as Lukeios, Erytheia, etc.). Subtract one from his list, because I made Perseis into a disambiguation page. I've gotten bored of digging through User:Tucci528's contributions at the moment, but I'm 99% certain that virtually all if not all of his "most recent edits" are redirects... (*yawn*) Alexander 007 14:21, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed Tucci's 305 figure (of which I've verified only 47 ATM) to 304, minus Perseis. By the way, what are we going to do with Wikipedia:List of Wikipedians by most recent edit? It's not protected from updates; yet if updated, it will be a totally different list. The previous list would then be relegated either to an archive or simply to the edit history. Unless automatically and constantly updated by some new programming system, this list is interesting only as a fossilized (and was it even accurate for its time?) list of the top most-recent-editors at that time. Alexander 007 14:56, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I feel that we have to do something about this as well. To keep this list mainly for historical interest is unsatisfactory in nature. A new programme to update this list automatically should be created. --Siva1979Talk to me 20:39, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs Attention
Talk:Far-right politics

message: The NAZIs were socialists, which makes them a left wing party.  And, the Democratic Party was the party of slavery and the South.  Just saying… 2603:6011:4602:A679:B870:A08D:2C68:6DC (talk) 16:09, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: See the FAQ at the top of this page. — Czello (music) 16:13, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The Nazis were never socialists. And the Republicans became the part of the South, also see DeSantis and Tim Scott on slavery as well as "Florida Democrat Introduces Bill To Prevent Teaching That Black People 'Benefited From Slavery'". And the Democrats ran the first black persons for President and later Vice-president. Doug Weller talk 16:33, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The pre-Civil War Republican Party was created in 1854 by anti-slavery Whigs and Democarts. The Democratic party ran two separate tickets in 1860, a Northern and a Southern ticket, thus letting the Republican Party to win. Doug Weller talk 08:30, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong history 

message: Why does the first sentence say "Far-right politics, or right-wing extremism, refers to a spectrum..." when, per WP:REFERS, it could say "Far-right politics, or right-wing extremism, is a spectrum..."
I'm asking on here rather than boldly replacing it as it seems like an obvious change and I'm confused why it hasn't happened already. TenToe (talk) 23:09, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: No objection here. DN (talk) 00:39, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  First sentence 

message: Please help steer conversation onTalk/Joe Kent and how to determine standards for "is far right" and putting "far right" in the lede, particularly because of Nazi imagery on this page and it's syndication to Bing , Google & AI chatbots.
We have plenty of sources placing him "America First", "MAGA", "Republican" and naturally many who like "far right" because of this page.
see also BOLP/NB/JK Tonymetz 💬  01:36, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guidelines for "Far Right" in Lede 

message: Far right, (on left you have extreme totalitarianism authoritarianism to the far right of total self autonomy).
Nazi or national socialism Is still far left even if some consider nationalism on the right. Nationalism of no extreme is moderate. Far right exceeds any need of nationalism as it is full anarchy for self autonomy (full freedom as long as it is not i fringing on others).
What infringements occur it goes full left as that is authoritarianism. 2603:7080:2C01:EA7:F031:C781:F39F:4910 (talk) 15:06, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: See the #FAQ at the top of this page; this is a definition of far-right/left that isn't recognised by historians and politican scientists. — Czello (music) 15:19, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  totalitarianism authoritarian is far left
Talk:Orders of battle for Downfall

message: Grant65 asked, "How could newly-formed Aust and Canadian divs have been part of British X Corps?"
I figure they were assigned to a pre-existing organization, the name of which was changed to fit. Checking the histories of the UK X Corps, Lt. Gen. Charles F. Kneightley, and the British 3rd Infantry Division ought to tell.
—wwoods 17:48, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:   Commonwealth Corps 

message: Why is this article called 'Orders of battle for Downfall'? Surely it should be called 'Orders of battle for Operation Downfall'.
This would bring it into line with other 'orders of battle' articles, agree with the opening sentence of this article and not lead readers on a wild goose chase towards the film Downfall (Der Untergang).
RASAM (talk) 20:59, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename ?

message: I propose to change rank abbreviations to reflect accuracy (USA: GEN not Gen, USN: ADM not Adm). Comments, questions, suggestions? Bullmoosebell (talk) 03:29, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rank abbreviations
Talk:Old Harry Rocks

message: How high is old harry? --Mark J 13:55, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: can you get a map of old harry and his wife  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.77.42.30 (talk) 15:26, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  old harry  

message: The article says: "Old Harry's original wife fell in 1509". Is this true? Some other sources say the original wife died in 1896.
https://www.nationaltrust.org.uk/studland-bay/features/old-harry-a-purbeck-landmark  
Juuha (talk) 17:51, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old Harry's wife 

message: Hello! During late June, July and some of August, I'm working on a paid project sponsored by the National Trust to review and enhance coverage of NT sites. You can find the pilot edits here, as well as a statement and contact details for the National Trust. I am leaving this message when I make a first edit to a page; please do get in touch if you have any concerns. Lajmmoore (talk) 17:30, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  National Trust pilot
Talk:Scientific method/Archive 10

message: Unfortunately, there are multiple threads of conversation on the same talk page. I am attempting to at least separate the threads by adding more of an outline structure to the headings. My first change is to push this linear structure into more of a tree. Ancheta Wis 08:51, 30 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Note

message: A professional historian has determined that scientific enterprise is in need of editorial help. This topic is based on the 'scientific method' article. If you want to contribute your knowledge about the 'scientific method' to scientific enterprise, it is currently open for edit, with our best wishes to you.
:I'm glad that a 'professional historian' has taken an interest. But, in the nature of the WP, extra-WP position or status does not take priority. One must take one's chances, in a sense. This is a 'community effort' (self-selected really) and it includes both professional and, ahmm, non-professional members. More or less like life, and there are disadvantages to that approach. But it's the approach we've all accepted. ww 14:10, 13 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: There is another article to be cleaned up

message: Stephen Hawking has changed his position on Hawking radiation (a re-characterization) which for a 10^11 kg black hole, predicts an evaporation time of 3 billion years. Thus one possible  experiment is to observe Astronomical objects at a distance of 10.7 billion light-years for Hawking radiation. However, such an object would have sucked in matter in the associated galactic cluster(s). How intense would the Hawking radation would have to be before being noticed above and beyond the activity from the associated materials (such as dust clouds)?
Ancheta Wis 17:27, 16 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Hawking radiation]] (a re-characterization) 

message: See Model checking for a statement of how the algorithmic model behind the scientific method works. Ancheta Wis 07:29, 30 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: 4 Fundamental steps in the scientific method

message: See Otto Loewi's example of his crucial experiment - how it came to him in his sleep Ancheta Wis 00:29, 30 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Data for Creativity section

message: I plan to revert the deletion. Does it make sense to convert this to a reference to the list of topics on scientific method, and use this change to stimulate discussion? Ancheta Wis 12:13, 4 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anonymous deletion of annotated list.