lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Macedonian Orthodox Church/Archive 1

message: ...Then this is not a place for learning the truth.
Dear anonymous, while you obviously sincere in what you are writing, you are copying into Wikipedia the exact text from the website of the Macedonian Orthodox Church -- including the capitalization of the word AUTOCEPHALOUS. This is a violation of copyright. Please stop doing that. -- llywrch 03:44, 22 Oct 2003 (UTC)
thread_title:  If Wikipedia supports this.... 

message: The text is taken from the Official web site of the Macedonian Orthodox Church, and represents a short version of the history of the MOChurch, given to the public BY Macedonian Orthodox Church.
This text is not signed with my name, therefore I am not violating any  copyright rule. 
Editing the text is ok (as a trademark of Wikipedia), but when you see that the text is turning into something which is purely a point of view of somebody which is the cause why MOC is not recognized..that seems like politics.
Wikipedia suppose to be a source of pure information, but not a source of the daily politics.
Protecting the page in such a manner is wrong.
Copying information from another site without the site owner's explicit release to the GFDL license is a copyright violation and is not acceptable on Wikipedia.  RickK 04:08, 22 Oct 2003 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright???
Talk:Bharatiya Janata Party

message: Over the course of their two consecutive terms, there have been many allegations over alleged attempts over control over ED , SC,electoral commission,  in a wider list, even media can be included. Harveyspecter210 (talk) 05:02, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  allegations over attempted control over independent democratic institutions 

message: → Page using Template:Infobox Indian political party with unknown parameter "farmers" —  — Page using Template:Infobox Indian political party with unknown parameter "national_convener". 
 — Maybe that content can be incorporated into the body of the article. Isaidnoway (talk) 20:48, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox parameters 

message: Critics have pointed out BJP is in general (mostly) a mixture of conservative social policies, with quite a bunch of left leaning economic policies; the article in misleading in that sense since BJP is mostly opportunistic/pragmatic/populist mixtures than idealistic purity in economics. I would like someone who has the access to this page to actually edit it. These are few of the citations: 1 2 3 4    Averagepcuser (talk) 16:19, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Those sources are all opinion pieces; per WP:OPED WP:NEWSORG, they don't carry much weight. We need scholarly sources making the same argument. Vanamonde93 (talk) 20:27, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: ok thanks! I couldn't find many scholarly sources, I will keep that in mind for my next contribution. I am guessing they(the scholars) might be using the label right-left economic policies in a different way than categorically sorting out policies one by one, but more in the line with typicality of a party belonging to the category relative to others and their historical branding. If this guess of mine is true if BJP was non-hindu secular party on social policies it would be classified as centre to centre-left by the scholars. (I think I should look more into how scholars use this criteria by resisting the human urge of falling into word essentialism)  Averagepcuser (talk) 07:39, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a considerable body of literature showing that the BJP's economic policy has focused on deregulation, which is not a leftist priority. It has undeniably mixed in populist priorities, which we cover; but calling them "leftist" is not something we can do without reliable sources supporting that terminology. Vanamonde93 (talk) 16:01, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Critics have pointed out that BJP is hardly Right wing economically. (Requested edit since the page is protected)
Talk:BookFinder.com

message: In what sense is this not an advertisement? User:Wetman
In the sense that, at least in the internet bookseller community, mxbf was an important milestone and powerful tool.  Also, most any review of a book, movie, etc can be seen as an advertisement, are we to delete those? Elde 00:43, 12 Mar 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: In what since is it an advertisement? It gives the history and ownership of a notable business, same as any other Wikipedia article. It neither promotes nor detracts. Softlavender (talk) 10:08, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Eurovision Song Contest 2002

message: I have amended this section to make it clear it was an allegation and not officially proven. Also I deleted the line about 2002 being the last year of juries. They have been used on numerous occasions since when a national televote has failed or insufficient televotes have been received, often the case with smaller countries such as Monaco, Andorra, Albania and San Marino. Vauxhall1964 (talk) 01:05, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Juries vote swapping 

message: the 2009 article does have that so all others should get it. it is beyond my knowledge though.84.212.73.96 (talk) 18:08, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  this article needs more information on the design
Talk:Spaghetti

message: In my experience, in the U.S. (and elsewhere), among lay people (i.e., not manufacturers, salespeople or chefs), "spaghetti" refers to a dish prepared with spaghetti pasta (often referred to as spaghetti noodles) rather than the pasta alone.  The typical lay person would say something like, 'Pick up some spaghetti noodles, tomato sauce, and garlic so I can make spaghetti for dinner." I think this use of the word should be made clear if somehow a reference can be found. Kdammers (talk) 15:56, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Isn't that common for many foods? If I say we're having salmon or meatballs or orecchiette for dinner, I'm not saying that they'll be served uncooked or plain. --Macrakis (talk) 17:49, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  The salmon and meatball examples are not comparable (I don't know what orecchiette is).  A spaghetti dish is not just cooked noodles/pasta; it involves a whole set of other ingredients, that some might even consider more important than the wheat product. Kdammers (talk) 00:33, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

text: "Go to the supermarket and get me four boxes of spaghetti, 4 boxes of macaroni, 2 boxes of angel hair, and two boxes of rotini; pasta is on sale this week." Drsruli (talk) 06:53, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  as a dish 

message: — Assignment last updated by Nurbekyuldashov (talk) 01:52, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Linguistics in the Digital Age

message: Skronkydonkey (talk) 00:23, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. JTP (talk • contribs) 00:32, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 27 February 2024
Talk:IRIX

message: Rumors abound ... is not encylopedic. That paragraph should be removed. 69.143.133.51 19:38, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  "rumors abound" 

message: I removed this statement: SGI has retired IRIX and the MIPS architecture in favor of Linux on Itanium, it is however expected that IRIX support will continue for a while longer. This is wrong. According to the SGI website, IRIX® 6.5.29 has been released and is shipping with all new systems from SGI worldwide manufacturing centers. (sgi.com). Sietse 15:12, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Reason for removing paragraph about irix EOL

message: The article makes exactly one use of the string HPE.  Perhaps it refers to Hewlett Packard Enterprise.  The sentence about Hewlett Packard Enterprise currently reads:
   As of 2016, due to the bankruptcy of Silicon Graphics in 2009 and its subsequent purchase by Rackable Systems, which was later purchased by HP Enterprise in 2016, no SGI-badged hardware produced after 2007 is capable of running IRIX, instead designed to run Red Hat Enterprise Linux or SUSE Linux Enterprise Server, based on either IA-64 or x86-64 architecture.
I'm sure the sentence is long enough to accommodate a few additional characters to introduce HPE.  For example, it could read:
   As of 2016, due to the bankruptcy of Silicon Graphics in 2009 and its subsequent purchase by Rackable Systems, which was later purchased by HP Enterprise ("HPE") in 2016, no SGI-badged hardware produced after 2007 is capable of running IRIX, instead designed to run Red Hat Enterprise Linux or SUSE Linux Enterprise Server, based on either IA-64 or x86-64 architecture.
Or, it might even be possible to break up the sentence into several pieces.
Son of eugene (talk) 19:43, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The acronym HPE is used but not defined
Talk:Jacques Herbrand

message: "He introduced recursive functions in about 1932."  Posthumously?   Michael Larsen 11:35, 22 Oct 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: Why? He still lived and worked in 1932. Anyway, I don't know what publication this refers to ... OK, the article actually already answers this question. --Markus Krötzsch 07:18, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Am I right to assume that, due to his Frnech origin, "Herbrand" is pronounced vaguely similar to "air-brond" (well, you get the point ;-). Especially, the "H" should be silent. This has consequences in English writing: e.g. one has to say "an Herbrand base" instead of "a Herbrand base" -- which in this case would be one of the major orthographical errors in theoretical computer science (try your favorite websearch for "a Herbrand" vs. "an Herbrand"). I also think I remember some major logic-related textbooks (such as Lloyd's introduction to logic programming) to use "an" correctly. Maybe someone could confirm this and give a hint somewhere on Wikipedia ... --Markus Krötzsch 07:10, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 
Talk:Flags of the Philippine Revolution

message: It seems that this is an incomplete article due to absence of some important flag this includes the absence of flag of Katipunan that consist of Letter K in triangular form,The flag which only consist of single K at the center, and the personal flag of Macario Sakay while in office as president of Tagalog republic. Please do some research and include the following to he article for better understanding...- 121.54.2.91 (talk) 18:13, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  August 2011 

message: revolutionary flags of the Philippines 124.105.17.99 (talk) 10:39, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aralin panlipunan
Talk:R. Budd Dwyer

message: Based on the English Wikipedia guideline regarding Offensive Material
It does not seem that the following portion of the "Suicide" section does not meet this standard.
I cannot ascertain the purpose of this graphic description, and therefore think its removal should be seriously considered.
Forgive me if my proposal is not in line with wider standards on Wikipedia. I am not a frequent contributor so I hope my ignorance can be forgiven in this instance. Wagenenr (talk) 00:12, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Graphic description of suicide Unnecessary 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 16:09, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: R. Budd Dwyer →  – WP:COMMONNAME, Google Trends data shows that the term "Budd Dwyer" is overwhelmingly searched more than "R. Budd Dwyer". (https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=US&q=R.%20Budd%20Dwyer,Budd%20Dwyer&hl=en-US) Additionally, this seems to be the name most people, in the media and otherwise, addressed and addresses him as. MountainDew20 (talk) 09:50, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 21 May 2024
Talk:List of Chinese monarchs

message: Nurhaci and Hong Taiji should be added, and we should stick with the biological relations in the Succession box. Ignore the "adoptions" 5.12.116.130 (talk) 5.12.116.130 (talk) 17:21, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed with the biological relations, an oversight on my part. However, the inclusion of Nurhaci and Hong Taiji makes little sense. Neither was a ruler of the entirety of China, and that section is not merely a recreation of List of emperors of the Qing dynasty. You'll see in the Shunzhi Emperor's infobox he is preceded by Hong Taiji as the Emperor of the Qing dynasty, but preceded by the Chongzhen Emperor in the Emperor of China section. Aza24 (talk) 20:01, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Qing dynasty 

message: Why is she not added? She was after Emperor Xiaoming. #bodyContent aFlag Creator { background-color: #ffa500; color: #ggggggg; font-weight: monoscope; } 10:10, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, by the way sorry for the codes I've done. I tried to make a signature. It's unchecked. If anything's wrong Please inform me. #bodyContent aFlag Creator { background-color: #ffa500; color: #ggggggg; font-weight: monoscope; } 10:11, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: We could possibly include her and format her like other contest rulers, but we would need reliable academic sources to assert that she fits that categorization. She does not appear listed as a ruler for any of the sources in the Northern Wei section. Aza24 (talk) 17:34, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Daughter of Emperor Xiaoming 

message: Hi , I'm just going off the article on Emperor Taizong of Tang. Isn't an unspecified "expansion" a better idea? I'd consider Emperor Taizong of Tang#Goguryeo-Tang War an eastward expansion. Thoughts? soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 04:25, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd be fine with an unspecified "expansion", since the Tang campaign against the Eastern Turks could well be considered a northward expansion. But I'll point out here that as the article you linked to says, Tang Taizong had to withdraw from Goguryeo. Only under Tang Gaozong did Goguryeo fall. Double sharp (talk) 04:43, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

text: Changed to "territorial expansion". Double sharp (talk) 04:43, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, that works! soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 09:31, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion
Talk:SP

message: ----
My initial definition of Scientology SP as a "condemned and shunned heretic or wrongdoer" is perfectly factual. They are condemned with a formal notice (an "SP Declare" - on special colour paper) and thereafter all members of the Scientology community (including, in many/most cases, their own children) are forbidden to have contact with them. The offenses for which one can be declared an SP include deviation from formal CoS doctrine (the Scientology jargon for this is called "being a squirrel"), or normal criminal activity (theft, fraud, etc). I think "heretic" is the normal English word which best captures the meaning of "squirrel", so I'm putting it back the way it was. Noel 15:11, 22 Oct 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, the CoS propaganda I've seen seems to suggest that SPs are sources of trouble - they won't really admit that these people are heretics or wrongdoers - when in fact, as you say, that's what they are. So the CoS POV should be added? Dysprosia 22:32, 22 Oct 2003 (UTC)

text: The term is also used by the CoS to describe outsiders who are actively antagonistic to Scientology, so the term has two meanings. Noel (talk) 14:41, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)

text: There are a lot of places actually called South Park you know. --Dimitrakopulos (talk) 21:12, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

message: This is just a random collection of things that happen to have the initials SP. How many of them are actually referred to by those initials? 2.27.101.222 (talk) 16:39, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Initial letters 

message: The band is frequently referenced by the initialism SP, the band's primary iconography centers around a stylized SP, and fan tattoos use this iconography of SP to refer to the band. For visual evidence see a google image search. Restoring edit. --Mandra Oleka (talk) 10:45, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Given a second revert with the reason given "no indication in linked article of being known by these initials" I would note that within the same section ("In arts and entertainment") all entries that are not simply some variation of SP alone fail this test as well. South Park does not mention within itself that the show is known as SP, nor does the article for The Smashing Pumpkins. A cursory check of other popular entertainment properties shows this test for disambiguation entries to also fail for the first five I checked: OD - One Direction, WTC - Wu-Tang Clan, BB - Breaking Bad, GGD - Goo Goo Dolls, ATHF - Aqua Teen Hunger Force. Suggestive of a common practice.  Nevertheless, following the suggestions in Wikipedia:Disambiguation I have added material to the Skinny Puppy article regarding the iconography/logo. --Mandra Oleka (talk) 22:11, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Having waited several days with no dissent, restoring entry. Mandra Oleka (talk) 10:24, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Skinny Puppy 

message: In Roblox, people often refer to Slap Battles as "sp". Can it be added here?142.118.16.138 (talk) 02:27, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Slap Battles
Talk:Brunswick

message: Wouldn't it be more sensible to have the article at Brunswick, Germany here and move the disambiguation page to Brunswick (disambiguation)? - Sandman 16:18, 22 Oct 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: I strongly support this view. German Brunswick is the predecessor for all the other smaller cities. We would not want to use Paris as a disambiguation page to list Paris, France, next to Paris, Texas, either.  
-- 134.169.99.112 12:46, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

text: I'm not entirely convinced - given the number of things on the disambiguation page, there's a fair chance someone will end up at Brunswick looking for something else.  Admittedly, some of them are just stubs, or bot-generated, but I think some of them may end up being worthwhile in their own right.  But maybe with an appropriately prominent link to the disambig page it could work... - IMSoP 23:29, 24 Nov 2003 (UTC)

text: All the things that link here (to the disambiguation page) should be linking to the Brunswick, Germany page. Swapping the two and putting the usual disambiguation line "For other meanings..." seems appropriate. None of the other uses of Brunswick seem nearly as prominent. Maximus Rex 11:15, 25 Nov 2003 (UTC)

text: See Talk:Braunschweig (city) for the detailed discussion and final decision on article naming.
----
Eloquence, why do you consider it inappropriate to have a link to Brunswick Records? If I remember correctly, when I created that article I had to fix a few links to "Brunswick" which should have gone to the record label. I thought preventing that sort of thing was the purpose of disambiguation pages.  -- Infrogmation 23:05, 8 Jan 2004 (UTC)

text: I am going to put a link to Brunswick Records back in. People who deal with old recordings often just say "Brunswick", and I suspect someone might  carelessly not specify "Records" when making a link in Wikipedia again some day. -- Infrogmation 04:16, 3 May 2004 (UTC)

message: Should't Brunswik and Brunsvik also be listed here? Inge 13:00, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Names with different spelling 

message: There is a move discussion at Talk:Braunschweig#Requested Move 2: MOVE TO BRUNSWICK!!! that affects this page. Please participate there. older ≠ wiser 11:59, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion in progress
Talk:Gangwon Province, South Korea

message: The duplicated notice by Sewing was moved to Talk:Dispute over the name Sea of Japan, not to make discussion scattered over Wikipedia.
:The above unsigned comment was added by Nanshu. --Sewing 16:32, 24 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Notice

message: We have separate articles for 강원특별자치도, one at Kangwon (for the North Korean portion), and one at Gangwon (for the South Korean portion).  We don't have a separate article for the Joseon-era province, but it seems fairly obvious that we should, along the lines of Jeolla, Chungcheong, Hamgyong, etc.  Since Kangwon and Gangwon represent the same Korean word, and are often used interchangeably to refer to either the North or South Korean provinces, I propose to:
1.  Move Gangwon to Gangwon, South Korea
2.  Move Kangwon to Kangwon, North Korea
3.  Make Gangwon and Kangwon into disambiguation pages, one possibly redirecting to the other.
4.  Create Gangwon (Joseon) for the historical/geographical entity which was once one of the Eight Provinces of Korea.
Seems like this would straighten things out a lot.  Certainly information the Joseon-era province doesn't belong in the article on the South Korean province, where it is now.  Comments? -- Visviva 11:33, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Hearing no objections... 1 & 2 done.  -- Visviva 08:26, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multiple Gangwons 

message: The redirect Kogen Province, South Korea has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Konno Yumeto 02:45, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Kogen Province, South Korea]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: As per the Gangwon provincial office, the name of the region has been changed from Gangwon province to Gangwon State. This occured in June 2023. This is the official english name, despite the literal korean translation not directly ranslating to state. Would it therefore be possible for someone higher up than me to change the name of the page to Gangwon State? 
https://state.gwd.go.kr/eng/introduce/GovernorOffice Ben (talk) 07:11, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changing title of page to Gangwon State
Talk:Gyeongsang Province

message: The duplicated notice by Sewing was moved to Talk:Dispute over the name Sea of Japan, not to make discussion scattered over Wikipedia.
:The above unsigned comment was added by Nanshu. --Sewing 16:33, 24 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Notice

message: I agree that the name Gyeongsang comes from Gyeongju and Sangju, but I don't believe that the current text is correct: the gyeong in Namgyeong
does not match the gyeong in Gyeongsang, but the one in Gyeongju does match.  Is there a source for the origin as currently given?  --Reuben 05:47, 14 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of the province's name 
Talk:Geography of North Korea

message: The duplicated notice by Sewing was moved to Talk:Dispute over the name Sea of Japan, not to make discussion scattered over Wikipedia.
:The above unsigned comment was added by Nanshu. --Sewing 16:30, 24 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Notice

message: The Armistice Agreement between North Korea was signed by the Commander, United Nations forces.  True, he was an American general -- but he was wearing the UN hat at the time.  The Armistice itself (see: http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Korean_Armistice_Agreement0 refers to various maps, but I can't find such maps on the Internet.  I do know that maps were created during the armistice talks.  Duplicates (or reproductions) of them are on display at the War Memorial of Korea in Seoul.  With these factors in mind, I've corrected the wikilink as to who drew the line -- leaving it as a "UN" creation -- but deleting the adverb "unilaterally".--S. Rich 17:22, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  NLL 

message: The environment section here seems to be a copy of a section of the Environment page and only relates to environmental problems.--Jack Upland (talk) 08:07, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Environment 

message: The article currently has 3 images which are essentially maps. Can't we have some variety?--Jack Upland (talk) 10:21, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images