lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Sattar Khan

message: Who is spamming articles unrelated to the Republic of Azerbaijan with the WikiProject Azerbaijan tag? WikiProjects have a certain scope, they do not apply to everything.Hajji Piruz 14:08, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The fields "ethnicity", "religion" and "denomination" are now deprecated.  This means that they do not show up in the info-box, and they put the article in a hidden category for clean-up.  For this reason I have removed them from this article. 
All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 00:55, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for clarifying. Best regards.---Wikaviani (talk) (contribs) 01:06, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox person
Talk:List of Mermaid Melody Pichi Pichi Pitch episodes

message: The class has been downgraded from B-class to Start-class.
Quite frankly, this article is in need of three things.
#A brief description of each episode.
#An image from each episode. Low-resolution images (perfect for this guide) can be found at the official website.
#The image songs used in each episode, i.e. Legend of Mermaid, Ever Blue etc.
Once one of these tasks has been satisfactionally accomplished, I'll raise the article to B-class. Likewise, if two tasks are accomplished, I'll nominate it for Good Article status, and if all three of these tasks can be finalized, we'll see if we can make it a Featured List. I only have access to the first 33 episodes, so I'll make a start on the list (maybe in a day or two) and we'll see where we go from there. --Ppk01 20:51, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As a note to current editors, the above suggestions are very outdated and should not be followed. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 03:10, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Class = Start
Talk:List of Monster Rancher episodes

message: Where did the information for monster rancher cross come from? As far as I can tell it doesn't even exist.
First, you can find the episodes on veoh and youtube; second, the title for episode 16 and 17 are swapped, I believe.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.180.116.169 (talk) 01:37, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've started working on the lead and references for this article in order to wikify it.  I'm mostly just taking information from the main article for the anime to build an overview, and I will probably look into a way to make the numbering system more obvious (like using a decimal system to show intra-season episode numbers as opposed to listing plain numbers next to the overall series number).  If more work needs to be done beyond this, please feel free to either take care of it or bring it to my attention so I can fix it. Benjiboy5187 (talk) 13:44, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Finished working on page.  I'm not sure how desirable the director bio is, but the information was not listed elsewhere, so I included it.  I fleshed out the lead, broke the seasons up to reflect the English airing run, and changed the numbering scheme to be more intuitive.  Future work for this article would include an infobox, similar to the one found on the main article page.  Benjiboy5187 (talk) 14:38, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikification Process

message: There seems to be an unconfirmed user using multiple IP addresses to this page, changing the airdates for the Japanese second season from 2000 to 2001. Would it be a good idea to lock the semi-protect the page to prevent this person from continue to doing this? I placed a request to do so. — Flowerkiller1692 (talk) 18:29, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should we semi-protect this page?
Talk:J-Crown

message: Does anyone know how New Japan came to control the titles from other organizations?  Is it relevant to the J-Crown?  I'm not sure if it's worth including it on this page.  (Assuming someone knows the answer.)  Maybe that's better left for the individual title history pages?  Dormammu 07:50, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

message: Can Anyone find pictures of the eight belts used (WorldSeriesOfPoker500 (talk) 07:40, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: @WorldSeriesOfPoker500 I have an image of Jushin Liger surrounded by ring girls holding all eight of the belts but I'm not sure of the rights on it and I don't quite know how to upload anything (Sorry, I'm pretty new to editing wikipedia). Pjjolly (talk) 17:08, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images Of The Belts 

message: Since their belt was used without their consent, sanctioning or permission, is it fair to list the title as actually representing WWF instead of the other two promotions? This is as "unrecognized" as it gets, and worse yet, it was disavowed by the promotion itself. Even if the belt was originally theirs, the recognition of it as a title certainly wasn't. 107.77.215.171 (talk) 10:32, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: WWF
Talk:VMFA(AW)-225

message: I am reluctant to keep the CE section that was added.  It will forever be changing, if it is done for one it should for all and I just don't think it is feasible.  I understand the importance of the XO and SgtMaj to a unit but as far as encyclopedic knowledge is concerned I feel that CO is the only one that is truly important.  Interested to hear other thoughts.--Looper5920 00:05, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree - the problem is that it is known in advance that this information will be incorrect within a reasonably short period (i.e. a few years at best) and after that, unless diligently updated, will provide misleading information to anybody checking this entry.  I could see that one would want to keep a historic record of the CO of a unit, in which case the years of command should be indicated. ThreeBlindMice 03:13, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Command element section
Talk:VMFAT-501

message: VMFAT-501 has officially returned home to MCAS Beaufort. Radio callsign SWEDE.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Archangel00 (talk • contribs) 05:51, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
Talk:List of Sonic X episodes

message: Isn't season 2 just a cartoon version of Sonic Advanture 1 & 2? --81.132.184.148 21:56, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Season 2

message: Isn't it usually that the Japanese episodes come first but how come more English episodes were made?  -71.107.147.75 (talk) 21:05, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  2 Japanese Seasons? 

message: I just saw the Commercial, If anyone knows the Episodes Please say so.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.48.171.244 (talk) 14:20, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: "I saw the commercial" is not good enough. You must provided a reliable source that a 4th season is in the works. If there was, there should be some sort of press release or other press coverage. —Farix (t | c) 22:23, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Season 4 Announced 

message: The episode names in the US DVD releases are different from the episode names in the episode list. If this is because the names in the episode list are translations of the Japanese names, then it should be changed to have the proper English name followed by the Japanese name with its translation in parentheses, or no translation (as it would be original research). I see these are already present for some of the episode names. Stifle (talk) 20:24, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The dubbed English titles are in parentheses following the translated Japanese title. As in: "Translated title" ("Dub title"). The translations aren't original research; they are the ones used when identifying subtitled Japanese versions of the anime. Michaelzeng7 (talk) 16:28, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction
Talk:List of Street Fighter II V episodes

message: The English air dates (assuming Sci-Fi keeps showing the series) is Tuesday.  Ani-Monday begins at 11pm and ends at 1am.  The show starts at 12am and ends at 1am, as such I adjusted the dates aired.
: I'm a DirecTV subscriber, and many program descriptions in the program guide have the year the program was first aired. I just noticed, on the descriptions for various Street Fighter II V episodes, it lists the year as 2004, not 2007 (the dates for Noein and Tokko are 2007). Anyone know why this might be? --Dinoguy1000 Talk 21:37, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Air Dates
Talk:African archaeology

message: "The earliest evidence of archaeological activity anywhere ..." or "The earliest archaeological evidence of activity anywhere ...." A correction might help, the preceding section talks of archaeology as being in its infancy on the continent. It reads as if archaeologists are seeking the traces of previous archaeology.
78.148.54.88 (talk) 17:34, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Survey (archaeology)

message: Hi I really like this page, but im surprised there are no references, WIkipedia is good for getting ideas and this is what this page does.
There seems to be a very academic-centred view of archaeological survey in this article as it stands. It needs an extensive re-write to incorporate the rather different approach taken under commercial, developer-funded, conditions. The techniques may be broadly the same but time and budgetary factors mean that there is not the same emphasis on drawing up research aims or on performing any high level of analysis.
I would also question the way the distinction is drawn between intensive and extensive survey. Certainly in the UK it is not unheard of for high resolution geophysical surveys to cover a number of square kilometers, and there is at least one research project, at East Heslerton where something of the order of 10km2 has been surveyed in this way. 81.153.228.212 21:45, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: The information in this section is dated. I would propose renaming it Remote sensing, as tis term is inclusive of the wide array of data collection and imaging techniques, including satellite-based systems. If such changes are made, they should also be reflected in the general article on archaeology. Tapatio (talk) 15:38, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aerial survey 

message: Hey there! I was checking out this article and noticed that links to References 2 and 11 aren't working. I can see if I'm able to find updated links to these sources. Banana.oceans (talk) 00:52, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links
Talk:Archaeological theory

message: The neutrality of the section on Post-Processualism is questionable since the nature of Post-Processualism in comparison to Processualism is disputed and argued as possibly being invalid, while the section on Processualism is let to stand without argument.
Egyptianboatmodel (talk) 07:04, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Insofar as post-processualism existed as a scholarly, as opposed to social, movement it existed as a critique of processualism, so I think the whole post-processualism section would, if done properly, be a counterpoint to Processualism. The bigger problem is that the critique of post-processualism doesn't cite its sources.  Alun Salt (talk) 12:50, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

text: Well let's see: processualism appears first in the article, because it's a chronological list. Post-processualism follows as a criticism of processualism, and at this point any casual reader like me might think that it represents the modern consensus. However, there are criticisms of post-processualism, too, so these are mentioned next. The final line of the section is a summing-up of processualism and not a criticism. That all seems perfectly fair. 81.131.1.177 (talk) 02:16, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I took a look at this page and found a major bleh--way to short for the matter at hand with huge hunks missing.  I propose using Bruce Trigger's A History of Archaeological Thought sections to address some of these problems.  I have to warn you Tigger's book is very system theory based
Here is a rough outline of the time periods Trigger uses:
* Antiquarianism (antiquities collection) ancient times through c1860
: Includes beginning of scientific archeology c1800
* Imperial synthesis c1860-c1880
:  Deals with the use of racism and nationalism in archaeological interpenetration
* Cultural-historical (Historical Particularism, National Archeology) c1880-present
:  National Archeology is still used in many parts of the world
* Soviet Archeology c1850-c1980
:  Some ideas used in the 1930s appeared in Western models in the 1950s
* Functionalism c1840-present
* Neo-Evolution; c1946-present; New Archaeology c1959-present
:  Includes Binford's use of system theory the model use currently in the field.  
:  Includes Intersocial Contact, neo-historism, neo-Marxism, and Contextual archaeology
What does everyone think?--BruceGrubb (talk) 15:58, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Would using Bruce Trigger's book as a guild be a good idea?
Talk:Culture-historical archaeology

message: The article is based on a single source (Trigger 2007), referenced 11 times. This is rather problematic for an article about a potentially polemic subject, isn't it? Denispir (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 20:00, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, I'd say that the content wasn't too bad. Trigger is the definitive source on archaeological theory. The bigger problem is that Wikipedia's archaeology coverage seems to be massively based on this outdated approach! PatHadley (talk) 21:55, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Single Source 

message: See comment on Archaeological culture PatHadley (talk) 22:40, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging in content from [[Archaeological culture]]
Talk:Cognitive archaeology

message: Renfrew's work in inferring social structure from tombs is good solid archaeology, but it's not mainstream cognitive archaeology, as it does not incorporate neuroscientific data in its interpretation. Nor does it discuss how social structure relates to cognition. Nor does it incorporate any of the 4E concepts that typify the British school of ECA.Hazegrae (talk) 17:25, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original Cognitive Archaeology
Talk:Dream Disciples

message: The article says "formed in 1990 by" and then goes on to list band members including Karl North. Yet North didn't join until the late 90's. Please can someone please modify the paragraph to correctly distinguish between the founder members on one hand, and those who joined later on the other? Andrew Oakley 12:21, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No takers, so have had a go myself. I don't know the exact date of Karl joining, though, so can someone add that, please. Andrew Oakley (talk) 11:31, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Founder Members 
Talk:Battle of the Barents Sea

message: According Arctic convoys of World War II
, the departure was from Liverpool. What is the right place?Tushyk 14:23, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Departure 

message: There was an in-line reference to Find a Grave that was inappropriate where placed at best. It was placed after information on a subjects retirement. Find a Grave is not considered a reliable source. Otr500 (talk) 10:29, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: Ok, so I replaced the Atlantic Ocean campaignbox with a new Arctic Ocean one, because this battle did not take place in the Atlantic.  If there's a problem with this, feel free to revert and discuss.  Howicus (talk) 23:24, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Campaignbox
Talk:Optical instrument

message: An optical instrument either processes light waves to enhance an image for viewing, or analyzes light waves (or photons) to determine one of a number of characteristic properties — Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.5.87.122 (talk) 09:08, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: optical instruments

message: Alright. We got that part... Any information about its general uses, lads? The article really lacks info. (Yea, its got a list of things that measure light's properties. But I believe its not enough to feed brains. Don't you think the article is very short for a thing of great interest? Just asking...) Would somebody supply bytes here, please... Thanks! Ü Zxyggrhyn 12:35, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  So... 

message: I suggest expanding this article by copying material from the newly expanded Optics article.  When copying material from one Wikipedia article to another, remember to state in the edit summary where it came from and give a link to the original page, to give attribution under GFDL to the Wikipedian authors (see WP:SPLITTING). It might make sense to copy all the material from the corresponding section in Optics to here, and then perhaps shorten the section at Optics slightly.  See WP:Summary re the relationship between summary articles and articles on subtopics. ☺Coppertwig (talk) 14:13, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Agreed this article needs some major work -- Apeman2 (talk) 14:05, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  It could really be improved by listing each class of optical instrument, then explaining it with a picture and internal links back to wikipedia articles specific to it. --Apeman2 (talk) 14:06, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Expanding
Talk:List of Buddhist temples in Thailand

message: Having this article is a bit like creating List of Roman Catholic churches in France. Unless the scope is tightened and criteria of inclusion established, this article won't be able to provide the reader with useful information. Paul C 09:13, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This one is in every way a list, not an article. Its interwiki also provides links to lists of Buddhist temples in Thailand. I think it's more appropriate to title it "List of Buddhist temples in Thailand". So, I'm changing it as such. Hope everyone would agree. --Melanochromis 20:08, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Point? 

message: Right now, this list is just a list of many temples. I feel like this article would be more beneficial if it were to list temples by date of founding or the period in which it was founded. Do I have to include a book or published source that already does this to pass the original content prohibition on Wikipedia? Yourlocallordandsavior (talk) 22:26, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the list is a good candidate for conversion to sortable Wikitable format. This would allow it to accommodate multiple methods of sorting within the same page. What might be the main problem for this list in the long run is that there are so many Buddhist temples in Thailand, the page will become too large to maintain or even view comfortably unless clear inclusion criteria are established. --Paul_012 (talk) 22:56, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Secondary list to list Thai Buddhist temples by historical era?
Talk:Michael Vaughn (Alias)

message: For the French Botanist and Explorer, see André Michaux.
Why on earth is this at the top? I don't see anyone getting confused between the names Michael Vaughn and André Michaux
:Because Vaughn's real/birth name is Andre Michaux RIANZ 03:15, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Botanist vs Vaughn
Talk:Kwan Tak-hing

message: :Was he born in Guandong in Korea or Guangdong in China?  ludahai 魯大海 09:42, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: He was born in Guangzhou. Thanks for pointing that out. Ian Kiu (hahaha...) 18:14, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: birthplace
Talk:Full contact karate

message: This is a good start for a full-contact article, but I think you should change "was pioneered by kyokushin" to "was popularized by kyokushin" or "full-contact sport karate was pioneered by kyokushin". 
First, it's kind of hard to say that any style "originated" full-contact karate since most karate styles at least used to be full-contact. 
Second, kyokushin is relatively new compared to the Okinawan styles which are still full-contact. Just my two cents.
--Bakarocket (talk) 15:26, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just a note

message: This article is currently rated as "stub" rated (which is bad), but has been significantly reworked and expanded since it received that rating.
How do we go about getting the quality rate "refreshed"?
:The status has been raised from "stub" to "start" level. Still needs to go higher  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.255.99.95 (talk) 10:40, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Raising quality rating 
Talk:Ban Mido

message: I just made two corrections, one in each section.
Firstly, under 'person' I adjusted some punctuation, as bracketed notes do not occupy a sentence on its own. I also noted the fact that while Ban doesn't have a chibi form like Ginji, he is occasionally given snake-like features and the style is simplified.
Secondly, regarding his abilities, it referred to his right arm changing into a 'snake's claw' Claws often refer to parallels to nails, and snakes do not have them. I changed it to 'jaw' because it is a snake's 'bite'.
Sam 17:53, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: My last two corrections

message: I've uploaded and added an anime screenshot of Ban. I am a little uncertain about the best position for the image or the details I included when I uploaded the picture.
Jojas 14:23, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: I'm going to replace your picture with the same picture just better quality.
Cause this looks like it got hit with the fuzz stick.71.142.240.203 (talk) 05:11, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture Replaced
Talk:GetBackers story arcs

message: *I have changed all character names written in Japanese order (family name first) to Western style. When I added the information about the first three story arcs I noticed that both styles had been used. There are arguements for using either style but I think one style should be used consistently. My natural inclination was to used the Western order as that is the English version of the manga. This also makes it consistent with the other articles in the catergory and the guidelines on anime article structure.
*Juubei Kakei: "Jubei" changed to usual spelling of "Juubei" with two 'u's
*Mouuen Ryu is a problem. The manga uses the transliteration Liu Mengyan which even has a different word order
Jojas 12:03, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Character Names

message: Are there any more Interlude stories?
My verifiable information only goes as far volume 15 of the manga. I don't know if there are are any more Interlude stories beyond the three mentioned so far and after the Divine Design arc. I suspect there are more and if so they should be added.
:An anonymous contributed has added interlude and early years arcs up to the Lost Time arc so I am editing the todo list accordingly
Jojas 12:05, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Interlude Arcs

message: Renamed some of the titles of the story arcs to match those used in the English translation of the manga. Originally I retained but commented out the existing titles but then decided to completely delete them. Here are the changes: 
*Act 4. Get Back the Divine Melody→(Get Back) The Sound of Life
*Act 5. Get Back the Magical Sunflower!→Phantom Sunflower
*Act 6. The Battle to Retrieve Mugenjou's "IL"→Return to the Infinity Fortress
*Act 7. Get Back the Arms of the Goddess!→The Arms of the Goddess
*Act 8. Kami no Kijitsu (The Divine Design)→Divine Design
*Act 9. Get Back Marlin Red! → Marine Red
*Act 10. Get Back The Eternal Bond → The Eternal Bond
(The title  of Act 4 includes "Get Back" in manga volume 4 but not volume 3)
Jojas 23:18, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "Marine Red" rather than "Marlin Red" (which makes sense if you consider the context)Jojas 00:53, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Names/Titles of Story Arc

message: An anonymous editor extended the notes for Act two and put the notes in to sub-section. 
I have altered this by converting the notes into sub-list instead of sub-section because I think the prominence of a sub-section heading disrupts the flow of the article and includes it in the TOC.
Jojas 15:08, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notes