Talk:OsCommerce

message: I notice that the Key Features Section reads a bit like an ad, could someone clean that up?Sneezy555 (talk) 02:23, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've just had another shot at cleaning it up, stripping the text that appeared to be mere puffery.  I wasn't sure what to do with the following sentence though: "Beyond the basic functionality, osCommerce is able to be augmented, via either community-supplied add-ons or custom code, meaning that it can be customized to meet the specific needs of any business."  Isn't that true of all software, and especially all open source software?  Should the sentence just be entirely nuked? --Irrevenant [ talk ] 09:14, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Key Features Section 

message: I suggest we add this link to the links section as an introduction to oscommerce.
* http://forums.oscommerce.com/index.php?showtopic=307356
As a newbie to oscommerce AND php, i feel the need to contribute in some way. The ONE thing that I feel I can help with is OTHER newbies. I know EXACTLY what their confusion feels like, and the FIRST thing that you NEED to understand is the file structure of oscommerce, and it is one of the MOST confusing aspects to newbies like myself.
So here goes your road map to the oscommerce file structure.
gioto (talk) 04:45, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Must Read Article for Newbies "Oscommerce Road Map for the newbies"

message: * The osCommerce Project - a fork of osCommerceosCommerce is Dead: Long Live the NEW osCommerce Project - By Kerry Watson (November 25, 2008)
gioto (talk) 00:20, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: thats right it is not added to the article? gioto (talk) 11:02, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: What is this "The New osCommerce Project"? It's not osCommerce and doesn't even look like an active project, there is nothing there but a very lite promo page. Proxy User (talk) 03:16, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: From the looks of it everything is happening in the Forums for this fork of oscommerce gioto (talk) 07:43, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Not Added to main article

message: *forks, ELOADED eShopFitters ELOADED
Removed from article as not notable
gioto (talk) 23:00, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Branches

message: I think the history would read a bit nicer if there was a split and the info about the development of v2.x and v3.x were under separate sub-headings.  Also, somebody needs to add info about http://blogs.oscommerce.com/post/3855902100/countdown-to-v3-0  seeing as how osC 3 is going to be finally released after 3 or 4 years of development.Pale2hall (talk) 04:21, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  A section for each main version? 

message: I have seen many recent attempts  to access the oscommerce shop and catalog directories on several sites hosted on my server.
Is there a security hole being probed for ???
DGerman (talk) 00:00, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Attack Vulnerable ??

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on OsCommerce. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20140711211643/http://oscommerce.com/ to http://www.oscommerce.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:33, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified