lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Cerebral achromatopsia

message: In this item, as well as in many others, too many words have been linked as wikiwords. As the article is about achromatopsia, linking flesh might not be a good idea. To demonstrate the effect, I hyper-hyperlinked this opinion. Please link words that are central or might require explaining in context. Linking all means the writer does not know what is central. 91.152.95.139 (talk) 10:15, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Hyper-hyperlinking

message: I have conducted research on cerebral achromatopsia, although, as you'll see, I'm not that sure how to edit Wikipedia. There are a couple of issues with the entry. First, I've been lead to believe that Oliver Sacks' case Jonathan I might be dyschromatopsic rather than achromatopsic (so he retains colour experience over a restricted range of colours - otherwise how could he have a preference for painting using one particular palette of colours?). Second, I am surprised by the assertion that cerebral achromatopsics always have poor spatial acuity - those I have tested certainly don't (patient MS, for example, can read fine newsprint). I've added (eventually - I struggled with the formatting) references for the ability of cerebral achromatopsics to discriminate wavelength contrast across edges (both refs are mine): 
Kentridge, R.W.; Heywood, C.A. & Cowey, A. (2004) Chromatic edges, surfaces & constancies in cerebral achromatopsia. Neuropsychologia 42, 821-830. 
Heywood, C.A. & Kentridge, R.W. (2003) Achromatopsia, color vision & cortex. Neurological Clinics of North America 21, 483-500.   
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.174.126.248 (talk) 20:40, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Dyschromatopsia, spatial acuity etc.

message: Considering Color agnosia redirects to this page, there is a real dearth of information here on it, and no discussion on why it is really different from cerebral achromatopsia. After some minor searching, there seems to be a lot of conflation between the two in the literature. Cerebral Achromatopsia is even listed as a type of agnosia. Can anyone elucidate? Curran919 (talk) 15:18, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Color Agnosia
Talk:Dana Andersen

message: this has slowly devolved into unsourced storytime content, much of it both marginally notable and long uncited.
please source and cite correctly before readding biographical content.
Saintstephen000 (talk) Saintstephen000 (talk) 06:12, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  problematic article
Talk:Dana Davis

message: Someone may want to check on the year that Dana graduated from Davenport North. The article states she was born in 1984 and graduated in 1997, which would make her 13 upon graduation. Also, one should check on the year she graduated from college; as the article states, she would be just 17 if she were to have graduated in 2001. [[Briguy52748 (talk) 15:00, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Birth date/graduation year

message: Can someone explain why 180px can not be used in this article? I don't understand why it can be used in other articles but not this one.--74.222.32.67 (talk) 21:31, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture

message: Is Dana Davis African-American?  I don't know, but someone categorized her as such.  There is no mention of such in the article.  Categories should follow mention in the article.  Please include some mention in the article (preferably with references) before adding her again to such a category.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:52, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is Dana Davis African-American
Talk:Champlevé

message: I notice that one of the images illustrating this article is an Byzantine earthernware cup which uses a form of decoration whereby a design is incised in the clay, then filled with slip, before being fired. Whilst it is true that the French word to describe this technique is indeed 'champlevé', in normal English usage I think the term is normally restricted to the enamelling of metal . Not sure what anglophone ceramicists would call this (I'm thinking 'encaustic' but that may only be for tiles?). Furthermore, the article itself only talks about champlevé enamel. Therefore I think it might be appropriate to change this for a more relevant image, perhaps a Limoges reliquary chest. Does anyone have any objections or shall I just go ahead? (If the term is correctly applied to the cup then this other usage needs to be reflected in the text.)
Might also add a little more on the history of its use in Western art if that's OK... StuartLondon (talk) 13:50, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, wouldn't that be sgraffito in english? Changed. Johnbod (talk) 15:22, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Illustrations 

message: The last line "External Links" has a broken link to the V&A article/video.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.7.195.97 (talk) 10:38, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Broken link

message: Early pocket watch metal dials are often described as Champlevé, e.g. by the British Museum http://www.britishmuseum.org/research/collection_online/collection_object_details.aspx?objectId=56577&partId=1&searchText=six-hour+dial&page=3. These dials often do not have any enamel on them. 
This leads to my question: Does Champlevé always mean enamelled? 
The term Champlevé itself in raw translation does not included reference to enamel, only to the creation of a raised field, in implication by depressing material around it. I suggest that Champlevé on its own could means simply this process, and when enamel is added it perhaps should be called "Champlevé enamel" or similar.
David.Boettcher (talk) 10:16, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: In the BM example I would suggest the black markings for the hours etc are indeed in enamel - if not, then what are they in? Mere paint? The technique box only says "inlaid" which is not very helpful. Johnbod (talk) 12:57, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: According to "The Camerer Cuss Book of Antique Watches", Antique Collectors Club, Woodbridge, 1976, p.302, the hollowed-out numerals of a Champlevé dial were filled with black or coloured wax, or pitch. He says that when a hollowed out area is filled with enamel, that is called "Champlevé enamel", which supports my original suggestion. David.Boettcher (talk) 11:09, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does Champlevé always mean enamelled?
Talk:Dana Rosenblatt

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: here, here, and here. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Diannaa (talk) 14:42, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Danah Zohar

message: And I would suggest be deleted, honestly. Also, this person is not a physicist and, while I found her in an optics journal publishing with a chemist, is clearly not well-educated in physics from her solo writings. 99.135.144.233 (talk) 03:12, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  This reads as a pioneering ground-breaking love letter 

message: Thank you User:Beeblebrox - in its current form this article is OK. It is now neutral and reasonably palatable. Jamesx12345 (talk) 21:30, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion 

message: This article is now basically a short stub due to the removal of material that did not adhere to a neutral point of view and material that was not biographical in nature. I am looking for sources that could be used to turn this into a proper biography but most of what I have found so far is either too brief or trivial to be useful, blatant reprints of press release type material, or written by Zohar herself.  Beeblebrox (talk) 21:42, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  issues
Talk:Chromolithography

message: Is there any way (or any need) to note the remark Cary Grant makes in North by Northwest, in the auction scene, when he loudly expresses his disbelief at a bid for a painting by shouting, "For that chromo?" --Wspencer11 (talk to me...) 14:40, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pop culture reference? 

message: Did they use halftone? If not what did they do instead?--Hhielscher (talk) 01:26, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Halftone? 

message: The article is somewhat impenetrable to the novice. As far as I can tell, the printing surfaces are painted with crayons, which somehow contain enough pigments to make multiple prints. How many? What sort of crayon can result in multiple deep colors applied to multiple sheets? What purpose is actually served by the use of gum and acid?
In the examples of single-prints, what aesthetic argument was made for their superiority over the simpler method of painting directly on the (final canvas or fine-arts paper) surfaces by master painters?
Mydogtrouble (talk) 14:55, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unclear! 

message: This section should be removed, as it appears to derive from a single article, that is, it's that guy's point of view, but there's nothing in particular to back it up, beyond his original research. Theonemacduff (talk) 21:46, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opposition? 

message: Oleograph redirects here but isn't used in the article. At present a reader who searches for it is given no indication of what an oleograph is. Can a definition be added to this article to avoid confusion? – Arms & Hearts (talk) 20:40, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oleograph
Talk:It's Only Talk

message: This page is on long publicity leaflet.
--Wataya7 (talk) 02:27, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Publicity
Talk:Collagraphy

message: As well as being a stub, this page is rather repetitive and a bit confused. I am writing a replacement. Ian (talk) 13:16, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: In some instances, leaves can be used as a source of pigment by rubbing them onto the surface of the plate.
This isn't a particular characteristic of collagraph and doesn't really belong here.Ian (talk) 10:28, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Daniel A. Baker

message: I'm not convinced that Daniel A. Baker is sufficiently notable to be included in Wikipedia. Anyone keen to make a case otherwise?Jimjamjak (talk) 12:51, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 
Talk:Corita Kent

message: This page originally has solid information , most of the advance work would be adding greater detail about Corita. Line 27 doesn't seem to be revised but more unnecessary wording added. The basis of the original article does have fluent grammar. Her “artistic style” piece is extremely lengthy, several lines can be contributed to “Career” section. The article is missing her family background, if that information can be located.
All of information seems to be neutral and historical. If it is difficult to find much more information, I would organize the information in a way that the reader has a better understanding.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lexichristina6598 (talk • contribs) 19:05, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  '''Peer Review''' 

message: I removed this CV list from the main space. It does not add to the value of the article.WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 21:13, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  moving CV items from main space to talk 

message: added  with the edit summary  While that statement is somewhat untrue, as there are Inuit people in BC, there are no Inuit reservations there. Please see List of Indian reserves in British Columbia.
 Peaceray (talk) 17:32, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Inuit Reservation in British Columbia 

message: The article says:
 By the 1960s, her work started becoming increasingly political. For example, her silkscreen print, stop the bombing (1967) is a large piece protesting the use of nuclear weaponry in bold, blue letters against a white and red background. 
But this is not correct. The silkscreen print, stop the bombing from 1967 was a protest against the ongoing bombing in Vietnam (Operation Rolling Thunder 1965-1968)
Here is the transcribed text of the screen print:
Of course, she did oppose nuclear weaponry, but this print is about conventional warfare and herbicidal warfare in Vietnam.--2003:CF:3F30:1914:75AF:4FBE:762C:31B8 (talk) 10:56, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Silkscreen print Stop the Bombing 

message: — Assignment last updated by Antje Gamble (talk) 16:18, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: History of Modern Design
Talk:Craquelure

message: I have almost no understanding of IPA so I don't know how to do this myself but it would likley be usefull to have an IPA pronunciation after the word in the original introduction. I looked up the article and was very interested in learning to pronounce it and think it was difficult to sound out. For those who don't know IPa is the international phonetic alphabet. 
meitme (talk) 13:16, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  IPA pronunciation 

message: Not used or explained in article. 86.159.197.174 (talk) 06:02, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why does "craquele" redirect here? 

message: In the list of types, Italian, Flemish, Dutch, etc., Italian is listed twice, first and last. Should the label for the second Italian perhaps be English instead?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.194.86.30 (talk) 15:23, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of types of craquelure
Talk:Curl-up

message: I doubt the translation of 'wentelteefje' to 'revolving bitch'. The real translation of a wentelteefje is french toast, but that is not what this is based on. Still I do not think the term 'revolving bitch' is correct, and think we should simply refer to it as a wentelteefje or, as the litograph is called in English, a curl-up. --Woodcutterty (talk) 17:58, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Wentelteefje does mean "revolving (little) bitch". See wikt:wentelen, wikt:teef. Although I also think this is irrelevant for the curl-up. R2D2! (talk) 04:11, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation
Talk:Curvilinear perspective

message: This page has lots of mistakes in how it categorizes things. 
* In general, curvilinear perspective is a general class of techniques, of which Flocon and Barre's method is one. (A definition of it that I use is  any single-viewpoint projection that doesn't preserve straight lines.) 
* Tiny planet projections are usually based on stereographic projection, not Flocon and Barré.
* Fisheye lenses use several different projections.  
* Barrel distortions and pincushion distortions are effects in conventional lenses.
Here's a reasonable survey of some other curvilinear perspectives  (see the paragraph on page 4 that begins with "In the nineteenth century..."), and here's a survey of associated curvilinear theories of perception.  --Aaronh (talk) 18:17, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Lots of mistakes in categorization

message: I am astonished that this page has been on Wikipedia for five years with no mention ever of Albert Flocon and André Barre's seminal work, La Perspective curviligne (1968), which was translated into English in 1987.  It's a brilliant, thorough explication of the whole process.  I don't know if I've made the article any clearer -- it was shockingly vague.  The French wikipedia (unsurprisingly) has a much nicer article on it. Artemis-Arethusa (talk) 01:07, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: No mention of Flocon and Barre?

message: Five point perspective is not the only variant of curvilinear perspective, saying that "it" uses five point perspective like there's only one construction method gives an insufficient impression of the different types of construction methods for linear perspective. The book "Vanishing Point" by Jason Cheeseman-Meyer covers both five and four point (or infinite point) perspective in an easily understandable way if anyone would like to add this to the article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.240.144.230 (talk) 10:32, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: No mention of four point perspective

message: *"The book Vanishing Point: Perspective for Comics from the Ground Up by Jason Cheeseman-Meyer, is one of the only simplified "how to do" books that teaches five and four (infinite) point perspective." is in the article - seems like an ad, and what does "one of the only" even mean. 203.153.200.146 (talk) 11:35, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Advertising?

message: Should indicate whether the math formula describes the 2D translation of a spherical perspective or other curvilinear perspectives (e.g. conic, parabolic, hyperbolic, etc.). It would be nice to have more formulas added.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.59.31.89 (talk) 03:52, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Math formula clarification and additions
Talk:Daniel Carcillo

message: "In that game, Carcillo was assessed a 5-minute major penalty and a game misconduct for boarding and attempting to injure Oilers defenceman Tom Gilbert." How is this in here? I watched this game mentioned above. Is it really appropriate to speak for the player? I mean, it was a reckless play, but if he was truly attempting to injure, how come he was the one injured? He missed the rest of the season. 205.172.134.23 (talk) 20:31, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

message: I feel that something should be added about the interactions on Twitter between Carcillo and Paul Bissonnette. Evbeverage (talk) 21:41, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beef with BizNasty
Talk:The Intelligence Men

message: It's not critical, but the name of SCHLECHT perhaps could more specifically refer to the once actual and, in earlier James Bond novels, fictional Russian sneaky agency of SMERSH.  They sound similarly comical in English.  SMERSH also is in the film of "From Russia With Love".  Robert Carnegie 92.40.1.52 (talk) 00:55, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

message: Overall structure, including the plot device of getting caught up in Performance, similar to that used in 1997's The Man Who Knew Too Little.  No sign of any critics at time spotting that, so I guess we can't add that to article due to WP:OR. Bill Martin (talk) 09:43, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Similar Productions
Talk:Daniel Cavanagh

message: This article DEFINITELY needs a better photo.
-- 16th April 2009  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.72.7.231 (talk) 19:53, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article is written in the style of a promotional press release, and is full of unsourced personal opinions.  Can someone please edit this piece, using Wikipedia:Verifiability, and Wikipedia:Neutral point of view as starting points.  Thanks,
Derek R Bullamore (talk) 13:32, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: POV

message: I'm rewriting this article. Please note that at the moment I'm mostly paraphrasing the original content into a more encyclopedic language, and this does not resolve most of this article's citation problems. I shall try to find adequate sources to verify these statements. Feel free to revert, or otherwise modify this edit.
Several of my changes: Removed an excessive list of a dozen his favourite bands which seemed of no direct influence on his career, and the refrence to Thatcherism which might have been interpreted in a negative tone. MammonI.Dumah (talk) 20:45, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite
Talk:Daniel DeSanto

message: I haven't seen any site saying that DeSanto was born in 1980 as the ones I've seen display 1984 as his birth year. Kitty-Kat 16:21, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth year 

message: Does anyone know where he was born or where he lives now?  User:DepressedPer 7:03, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  His Birthplace?
Talk:Drypoint

message: i made some edits here, based on my knowledge and personal experience, and then i used a textbook also  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gunner11 05 (talk • contribs) 19:37, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: oops, I see you did!Johnbod (talk) 20:13, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

message: I miss a closeup picture of the needle biting the plate or of a plate freshly bitten in comparison with a later stage or another intaglio technique. --Error (talk) 17:38, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture needed
Talk:Dun gene

message: Looks like a good article, but there is only 1 reference. It would be better if there were more.
--PEAR (talk) 09:51, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References? 

message: Horses are unguligrade, so the first joint above the hoof is the the joint between the finger/toe and the palm/sole, the second joint is the ankle/wrist, the third joint is the knee/elbow, and the fourth is the hip/shoulder.  It is a common error to misinterpret the homologies of the legs of unguligrades, mistaking the toe for the foot, for example, not realizing that unguligrades walk on the tips of their toes, and thus that the foot extends to the second joint.  However, when correcting the figure caption, I did not know that a horse-specific nomenclature is used, in which "knee" is used in a specialized sense different from its usual signification.  When discussing horses the horse-specific nomenclature should be used, and thus reversion of my edit back to knee was quite correct. MayerG 16:05, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it's a weirdness to call the carpus joint of a horse the "knee," when the analogous body part is the human wrist, actually,  and you aren't the first to call a fetlock the "ankle" but there you have it.  See the chart at horse anatomy for more fun.  The patella of the horse is located at a point called the stifle, and the metatarsus, analogous to the human "ankle," is the horse's hock, midway down their hind leg.  Montanabw(talk) 18:13, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parts of a horse's leg 

message: For updating:
*http://horsetalk.co.nz/2015/12/22/dun-deal-scientists-unlock-colour-secrets-horse/#axzz3v3gEgr5a
*http://www.nature.com/ng/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/ng.3475.html
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Montanabw (talk • contribs) 08:46, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: New research
Talk:Daniel E. Weber

message: Look at the references at the bottom of this list for notability. He was executive vice president of this organization for twelve years and was employed for thirty-six. This should be notable enough for one of the premiere organizations in food science and food technology. Chris 14:17, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notablitiy references 
Talk:Pu-239 (film)

message: According to IMDb this film was produced under the title PU-239.  HBO is showing the film under the title PU-239, and distributing the DVD's under the name PU-239.  Only at the 2006 Toronto International Film Festival was this film ever shown under the name The Half Life of Timofey Berezin.Based on this I am going to move the page to PU-239 (film). —MJBurrage • TALK • 17:47, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: The part talking about the performance of the actors playing the Russian crime lords doesn't sound very neutral at all; "charismatic" and "terrifying" are different points of view.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.19.65.48 (talk) 20:25, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV?