Talk:Neoplatonism and Christianity

message: No, I think the articles should remain separate.  The influence of Hellenistic philosophy on Christian theology can be properly divided into two parts.  First is the influence of Middle Platonism, Stoicism, and perhaps Pre-Socratic philosophy on Christian theology of the first three centuries A.D. (e.g., on  St. Justin, St. Clement of Alexandria, Origen, St. Gregory of Nyssa -- and perhaps earlier, even on the writers of the Gospels).
Neoplatonism is a later development, with a different relationship with Christianity.  By the time of Proclus, who influenced Pseudo-Dionysius, the relationship of Neoplatonism and Christianity is complex:  while Neoplatonism is influencing Christianity, it also seems true that Christianity is influencing Neoplatonism.  For example, the theurgical emphasis of Iamblichus and Proclus is sometimes interpreted as a pagan response to the well-developed liturgical practices of Christianity.
A further argument for keeping the articles separate is that Neoplatonism has continued to evolve since Late Antiquity.  There were many influential Christian Neoplatonists in the Renaissance (e.g., Marsilio Ficino).  There are even modern Christian Neoplatonist philosophers.  It is questionable whether these later Neoplatonists can accurately be called "Hellenistic philosophers."
Practical321 (talk) 12:33, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion: Should this article be merged with Hellenistic Philosophy and Christianity?

message: May I remove or at least heavily modify the section on Christoplatonism, which has bothered me every time I've come across this article for the past few years? Alcorn is a popular evangelical writer, not a qualified theologian or historian, and the term "Christoplatonism," which he coined, is to my knowledge used only by him, and only in a single book. Even laying aside the issue that his term is based on a superficial reading of Plato and the Church Fathers, I question whether it is notable enough to be included in this article, which sorely needs expansion in other areas. Finally, Alcorn's definition tells us nothing about either Christianity or Neoplatonism or the relationship between them except his hostility to the influence of the latter. Apologies for posting this anonymously, but I haven't had an active account on Wikipedia for a number of years, and need to get around to figuring that out at some point.--77.242.48.48 (talk) 13:03, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, I created a new account. I see my edit was reverted. Well, not a big deal, but I encourage anyone who intends to revise the article do something about that section. --CorvusMarinus (talk) 08:03, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Alcorn and Christoplatonism

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Neoplatonism and Christianity. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110722154244/http://www.umportal.org/article.asp?id=5101 to http://www.umportal.org/article.asp?id=5101
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140816004048/http://www.unl.edu/classics/faculty/turner/triadaft.htm to http://www.unl.edu/classics/faculty/turner/triadaft.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:22, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (February 2018)