lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hiroshima Toyo Carp

message: I know the kanji/romaji part is crap... give me a break. I don't even speak Japanese. Aug. 22, 2004; -plexus
:Thanks for trying anyway; I put some stuff in for more completeness. SWalkerTTU 03:55, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Is it standard to present the team's name in English as "Carp" rather than "Carps" as we would with an American team? Kortoso  (talk) 17:13, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Japanese has no plurals, of course.  As an anecdotal note, however, I'm currently living in Japan, and my Japanese neighbors who speak a little English all pluralize "Carps" when speaking to me.  That said, every official source I can find, including newspapers, do not place an "s" at the end of "Carp", which sounds so freakin' weird to me, but there we have it.  We can only report on what others have reported, and all 3rd party sources seem to fail to include the "s", so my anecdote would be OR at best, and is likely not even representative of Japanese preferences as a whole. Fieari (talk) 06:05, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: "Carp" is both singular and plural in English as well. oknazevad (talk) 13:07, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Japanese

message: The original setup had "Hiroshima Toyo Carp" redirect to "Hiroshima Carp". This was the opposite of Wikipedia logic, as well as of the particular arrangement of the redirection in the Japanese Wikipedia. "Hiroshima Toyo Carp" is still the official name of the club, and has been since the late 1960s—likely when the Matsudas took over.SWalkerTTU 03:53, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirection reversal 

message: Under "the Dark Ages" there is this line:
"The Hiroshima Carp was the last Japanese team to have a non-Japanese player on its roster (excluding Japanese-Americans)."
What does this mean? It can't mean what I think it does, because I think most if not all of the Japanese baseball teams have foreign players. I think this needs to be made clearer or removed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.102.61.97 (talk) 23:41, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Unclear sentence

message: How do we update the colors to be red and red? Hiroshima's color scheme has no blue anymore. RingoSB (talk) 14:39, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colors
Talk:Therianthropy

message: Hi! I believs you have the definition of therianthropy wrong, so im going to politely and respectfully correct your errors
Therianthropy is the belief and identification as one or more non-human animal(s) weither this is spiritual or psychological. Therianthropy comes in many forms and vairies from person to person. 
a Common misconception is that therianthropes physically identify as an animal, which is false. A physical identification as an animal is called lyncanthropy. (which there is already a page about) which is a mental illness. 
Therianthropy is commonly refered to with the furry fandom, while there are some similarities between the communities, they are NOT the same.
Just wanted to clear things up
-Andromeda  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andromeda Wolf (talk • contribs) 07:27, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. As a therian myself I feel this is a very good connection and understanding of modern therian. As I feel the words In this site are to old and hard to understand. HandsomeGUMS (talk) 02:02, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

text: Ah! Didn't realize that article existed. Seems like exactly the place.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  14:29, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Cool, I'll merge this section over. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 15:59, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modern therianthropy and this article 

message: The redirect Delta-Theta (symbol) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 16:32, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Delta-Theta (symbol)]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: please include a section at the start of the article specifging that 'Therianthropy is the psychological connection to an animal and it is an identity.' 2A00:23C7:7009:8801:820C:F9FF:FE3E:7F16 (talk) 22:25, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: what you propose seems pretty different from what this article about, what you describe is basically any relationship a human has with an animal, also not sure how that is an identity  Cannolis (talk) 23:39, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 14 February 2024 

message: i would like permission to edit because some of the information is incorrect. Fern1234567890 (talk) 11:15, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: If you post another protected edit request, this time saying exactly what change you think should be made to the article and why, someone can review your suggestion and decide whether to go ahead with it. The reason for protecting the article is that there is a history of new editors making unsuitable changes; it would defeat the purpose of protection if we were to just allow anyone to edit who just said they wish to.  JBW (talk) 11:33, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 10 May 2024
Talk:Wanderer

message: True or false: this will soon be made into a dis-ambiguation page. 66.245.99.94 23:54, 22 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: FALSE. It had been a minute earlier.--Jerzy•t 14:06, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  (Guessing game) 

message: Could maybe do with a mention of Sterling Hayden's Wanderer, both the boat and the book.Pottedplant 20:20, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  (S. Hayden)
Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (television)/Archive 1

message: Please vote for your preferred option, signing under one that's already there or adding your idea. One line per person please, and post replies in the talk section below.
Show Name (TV)
*I like this one - the shorter the better The Steve 05:46, Aug 9, 2004 (UTC)
*Brevity = soul of something. –Hajor 19:23, 21 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Straw poll 

message: Current methods being used to disambig TV shows.  Which is the best?  Trying to get a straw poll to add a section to Wikipedia:Naming conventions, so feel free to add other ideas and vote -- Netoholic 05:38, 9 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: There's already some discussion on this, almost all of it from last year, at Wikipedia_talk:Naming conventions (television) (which is a pretty well-hidden article, only linked to from Talk pages until now). I vote for article titles including TV only, with added qualification as necessary to distinguish different TV shows with the same name (eg by country, year...).-- Avaragado 18:10, 9 Aug 2004 (UTC)

text: That point was made some time back (example: "Dallas" is not a kind of television or a piece of television-related terminology, it's a television series), and I agree with it wholeheartedly. -Sean Curtin 05:45, 10 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  moved from Village Pump 

message: How should pages for individual episodes be named? This seems like something else that could be standardised. Some observed naming conventions:
In the case of Buffy and Alias the format is
<episode name> (<series name> episode)
In the case of The X-Files the format used is
<episode name> (<series name>)
In the case of The Simpsons and the various Star Trek's the format is
<episode name>
which leads to clashes with regular articles.
Someone has suggested on The Simpsons' talk page the format
<series name>/<episode name>
--Cfailde 15:27, 2004 Aug 20 (UTC)
* I'd prefer not to see any articles about specific episodes. These are not very encyclopeadic and always end up being worse than TV Guide descriptions.  Leave long episode articles to external fan pages or other Wikis.  I do not mind seeing episode summaries in the main article, or separated into season pages, like Futurama (TV series - season 1). -- Netoholic 16:22, 20 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode names
Talk:Minor races in Star Wars

message: This page was created in reaction to a number of stub articles about minor races in the Star Wars universe that kept showing up on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion. If only a paragraph or two can be written on a Star Wars race, then that race belongs here, instead of in an independent article.  Kevyn 00:04, 23 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Purpose of this page

message: Links and redirects to individual species on this page may be created using this format:
 
 Link: Minor races in Star Wars#RACENAME
 Redirect: #REDIRECTMinor races in Star Wars#RACENAME
Kevyn 00:04, 23 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Links and redirects to this page

message: I believe this and List of Star Wars races should be merged, with the small paragraph for every race (that there's info on).  For those articles (Like Wookiee) that have enough for their own article, they'd simply get an internal link.
Otherwise we leave ambiguity as to what's minor and what isn't. Oberiko 17:18, 19 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I have no objection to you moving this article to List of Star Wars races, combining the two articles, with one caveat: You must go into every article that links to the articles currently and fix the links (it will be a significant project). If you are willing to do that work, then have at it! Kevyn 00:08, 28 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmmm... I was hoping for the much easier "delegation" role. Alright, I'll start working on this then.  Oberiko 16:06, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC)

text: Because I moved everything here over to List of Star Wars races, I see no need for this article to remain wasting space. Riffsyphon1024 08:19, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging

message: Could some fanboy make a note of where in the SW canon these races appear? Mentioned by name in the movies? Appeared in the Cantina Scene or other crowded room, but weren't named? Only appeared in the books? It's a bunch fiddly details, but would do a lot to improve the quality of the article. crazyeddie 08:52, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: "Citing Sources"

message: The result of the VFD can be found here: Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Minor races in Star Wars -- AllyUnion (talk) 02:50, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  VFD Result
Talk:High-temperature superconductor

message: The crystal structure of hi Tc materials are all of the form RR'Cu204, where R and R' are rare earth metals, such as yttrium and barium, or lathnanum and strontium, or barium or strontium.  The copper and the oxygen exist two dimensional planes separated by the rare earth metals.  The beleif is that it is the copper oxygen planes that are responsible for the superconductivity.  The Tc's are of the order or 100 Kelvin at optimal doping.  Doping is the removal of electrons from the copper oxygen planes by chemical substitution of the rare earth metals.  The "parent compounds" (that is, the stoichiometric compounds before doping) are all magnetically ordered in a state known as "antiferromagnetic", where the electron spins alternate on neighbouring copper atoms.  Lanthinum and strontium hi-tc compounds have lower Tc's than yttrium and barium or barium and strontium compouds.  
-----
Might be nice to have a table with the currently known materials and their Tc's.
And maybe a bit about the crystal structure?
I'll try to write something if I get a chance.
-----
This page should be merged with High-temperature superconductivity 220.244.224.10 00:36, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Frink Park

message: True or false: this article will soon be made into a dis-ambiguation page. 66.245.99.94 00:11, 23 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, after almost a decade, we have no sign of any other notable Frink Parks; so I've moved this to simply "Frink Park" in accordance with our naming conventions. --Orange Mike | Talk 15:40, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Dab

message: Is there any actual reason to believe that the lower photo here is in Frink Park? - Jmabel | Talk 05:20, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lower photo
Category talk:Nordic folklore

message: Shouldn't this be merged with :Category:Norse mythology? ··gracefool |☺ 00:24, 23 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge to Norse mythology

message: I think it would be a logical move to merge the "Scandinavian folklore" category into this one as the "Nordic countries" include Finland. Having these two regions separated is a bit redundant - they have some relation. However, there's a gray area of cultural difference in Finland that could be troublesome considering it's not as related as the rest of the Nordic countries. I think there's enough of a relation to merge them. Maybe it should be retitled Folklore of the Nordic countries or the Wikitized equivalent? I suspect that might bring Greenland into issue though, which is really quite unrelated folklore-wise. I suppose further subdivisions could solve such issues if they appeared. :bloodofox: (talk) 12:10, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: On second thought, better to just make "Scandinavian folklore" a subcategory of "Folklore of the Nordic countries" and move the Scandinavian stuff into the "Scandinavian folklore" category and the rest into their respective categories, if they exist. :bloodofox: (talk) 20:05, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with Scandinavian folklore
Category talk:English people

message: True or false: this category belongs at :Category:People from England. 66.245.99.94 00:38, 23 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: What is a dichotomie?? 66.245.99.94 00:44, 23 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: A dichotomy is a division into exactly two, usually mutually exclusive, possibilities. A false dichotomy is a choice between exactly two possibilities where many other possibilities exist. It is a logical flaw. What I meant by alluding to it in response to your question is that there are many names this category might be given, and to suggest that if what you meant to indicate is "I think this category should be renamed "X"", you might just say that. And you might want to give a rationale for your feelings on that name choice. - Nunh-huh 02:09, 23 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It seems that there are some differences between the current use of this category, and its defining article:  
* at present, :Category:English people is used as territorially defined category, for the people of England;
* in the same time, current description claims that main article for this category is: English people;
* but, article English people is dedicated to people of English ethnicity, all around the world;
* therefore, strange difference exist between the current scope of this category, and its defining article.
Since the polysemic term English people is used as title for the article that refers to people of English ethnicity, all around the world, wouldn't it be logical to use :Category:English people for the same subject? In that case, proper name of the territorially defined category for the people of England would be :Category:People of England, or something similar. That would be consistent with the Wikimedia Commons: Category:People of England. It is quite strange that here on English Wikipedia any inconsistencies should still exist, regarding the use of basic terms like English people and People of England. Sorabino (talk) 21:47, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  English people
Talk:Gran, Norway

message: Moved content of this article from Gran to Gran, Norway, in order to create a disambig page at Gran. Kevyn 01:02, 23 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Move of content

message: The explanation about the origins of the Sister Churches with which I am familiar is that the Maria Church may have been built to serve a religious community, such as convent of nuns, while the Nicholas Church was built for the use of the local parish community.  The present explanation is confusing since Gran is a parish within the munipicality of Hadeland, i.e., one may assume that the other parishes of the municipality have their own parish churches.  The first explanation makes more sense since by having their individual churches the convent and the parish could each have their own services without them interfering with each other.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.52.199.50 (talk) 04:45, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: The Sister Churches
Talk:Renaissance man

message: The term often comes into use when bemoaning the fact that there are no renaissance men left in the world. Some people explain this by saying that during the Renaissance, it was easier to be an expert in all fields, as the total sum of knowledge was considerably smaller than it is today. And that since there is much more material to be known in any one field today, broad coverage at any sort of expert level is simply impossible.
i'd like to read an experts contradictory opinion on this, since it's not really true.
----
Totally agree on that one. I tried to change it before by making it more objective, but IMHO the second and the third paragraph should just be totally removed. I propose to do so if no one disagrees within a few days.
--Janderk 09:39, 23 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moan
Category talk:Christian hymns

message: Just to start defining the scope of this list before things get out of hand:
Is the Pange Lingua entry a worthy inclusion?  I believe so.
BUT:  Are we to type up the lyrics to any and all of our favourite hymns?  Surely not; unless we're creating the Wikipedia hymnal.  
So how to decide which are worthy of inclusion in total, which should get notes, which should just be listed at the composer's/lyricist's entry?
Quill 02:43, 23 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  What rates an Encyclopedia Entry?
Talk:Madrona Marsh

message: Anybody know why it is called "Madrona Marsh"? Are there madrona trees on the site?24.84.62.155 (talk) 00:38, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Name?

message: Not being in Torrance right now to read the sign that's posted on the outside of the Marsh, I can't say for sure, but I'm pretty sure that the Marsh is mostly open to public entrance -- subject to a few restrictions preventing abuse of the land.  At the very least, the gate on the north side is usually unlocked.
:Did not see this when I made my changes. However, "off-limits to uncontrolled" is a confusing double negative; and following the "once was" with a statement about guided tours implies that controlled access is still in force. If not, you may want to add a direct statewment to the effect that public access is now either encouraged or discouraged to clarify your uncertainty - Marshman 19:37, 20 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: ==
Talk:Professor Tomoe

message: Wouldn't Souichi be Sō'ichi in MOS style? WhisperToMe 03:57, 23 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I deleted Germatoid as a copyvio; perhaps you want to move this article (Professor Tomoe) to there. I'm not sure how you have it set up (with the redirects and all), so I'll let you do it. --Fang Aili  talk 23:30, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Germatoid is the thing that possessed him, though I'm not sure I recall the word "demon" alone being sufficient.  I do think there was a term the show used that season just like it did in other seasons.  I've put the name in for now, but I do wonder if the demon terminology should be ejected.  72.192.237.134 01:36, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Awesome. I'll change it to say 'evil entity', maybe? --Masamage 15:51, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  copyvio  

message: "but like many of the story's villains, he is considered to be more interesting (and sympathetically portrayed) in the anime." - According to who?  no support for this statement.  I'm an anime fan less versed in the manga, but from what I know many villains had more said about them in the manga.
Incidentally, an article about Germatoid should mention and link to Mistress Nine and vice versa.
The fan favorite claim may stem from the season 3 popularity I guess...  72.192.237.134 01:36, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, that's a little suspicious. I'll fix it. As for the link, I think you're right, but I'm only familiar with the first half of the S series, and don't think I could quite do that justice. Anyone else wanna give the Mistress 9 mention a try? --Masamage 15:51, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: tone of article
Talk:Indonesian rainforests

message: this entry seems more like a rant than an encyclopedia entry
:Indeed.  added. --TheParanoidOne 22:44, 26 May 2005 (UTC)

message: The article was voted to be redirected. See Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Indonesian_rainforests. Alan Liefting 13:10, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  redirected
Talk:Roseanne Barr

message: Another Roseanne controversy here: this time courtesy of an interview with Piers Morgan. In particular, she seems to be falsifying her own family history, claiming that her grandparents and their siblings were all marched into the woods and buried alive in Ukraine. But according to this Wikipedia article, her maternal grandparents were from Lithuania and Austria-Hungary (not Ukraine!), while her paternal grandfather (described as Russian here) changed his name from Borisovsky to Barr after immigrating to the USA. It would have been awfully hard for him to do that if Ukrainian Nazis had buried him alive! So it seems like she’s pulling a George Santos here. 2604:2D80:6984:3800:0:0:0:BCC8 (talk) 08:58, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you’re failing to understand here. Ukraine was part of the Russian empire at that time. Her Grandfather may well have been marched through and there is no mention of his wife or partner, Roseanne’s paternal Grandmother - why do you think Roseanne’s paternal grandparent and her father fled Russia and changed their surname? Fear. The kind of fear that makes you hide even when you’re out of the country, the kind of fear that makes you afraid to speak about what has happened to you for years. 185.69.144.199 (talk) 13:19, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

text: Borisovsky is a Russian, not Ukrainian, surname. And I've seen no evidence of Roseanne actually having any Ukrainian ancestry like she claims. Should she really be in the "American people of Ukrainian-Jewish descent" category? — Red XIV (talk) 03:02, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Ukraine comments

message: My comment was archived out of view for being "too old" despite only being posted 2 months ago, I'm posting it again here: 
"Roseanne made an appearance on Info Wars in March of 2023 where she was interviewed by Alex Jones. In it she espoused numerous false conspiracy theories including but not limited to an illuminati of elite individuals who have heart attack and earth quake machines used to assasinate celebrities and destroy cities via fake hurricanes. There are multiple news outlets that reported on this interview, and it's one of her most recent public appearances in several years. I believe this is relevant to be mentioned in the article."
Roseanne has gone on to have many more appearances on Info Wars since this March, and has also appeared in similar controversial interviews, so it is more relevant to the discussion of her current state of affairs than ever. 2601:602:900:7910:8DD:4B6B:2EF7:2A35 (talk) 13:07, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, I’d say that’s relevant. Especially because she described herself as a “targeted individual” in her most recent interview with Piers Morgan (see Ukraine section above). It’s highly likely that her comments about “assassinating celebrities” reflect an underlying fear that she could be next. It doesn’t justify any of the outrageous stuff she’s saying, but it likely explains it. 2604:2D80:6984:3800:0:0:0:BCC8 (talk) 13:22, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roseanne's appearance on Info Wars