lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Invasion, U.S.A. (1952 film)

message: The introductory paragraph to this article currently states:
:Invasion U.S.A. (in the actual title frame but not the publicity, Invasion USA)…
I just reviewed the only two elements of physical evidence I can find, the Synapse Films DVD release (available through Netflix) and the MST3K episode, and found they both displayed the same title frame, "INVASION USA". There are no periods in the title, which directly contradicts this opening statement. If no one can provide a source more reliable than photographic proof of these prints, I plan to change the title to "Invasion USA", update the text, and fix the various links accordingly. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 19:32, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title correction 

message: Reads like a trivia section to me.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.78.240.7 (talk) 00:35, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've renamed it to "Production and history" to better describe its contents.  Wasted Time R (talk) 13:46, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  the "Comments" section 

message: In the Production section, there is a sentence that talks about how the enemy although never explicitly named is clearly meant to be the Soviet Union based on the accents and other details. One detail mentioned was the use of Soviet aircraft such as the Tupolev bomber and the Mig fighter. The reference does not support this, there is no mention of Soviet aircraft. I also just watched the movie and the aircraft for both sides look to me like stock footage of US planes. The Tupolev bomber was literally a copy of a USAF B-29 Superfortress (one crash landed in the Soviet Union and the Soviets re-engineered it) and the Mig looked a lot like the Sabre jet so it is hard to tell for sure but I'm pretty sure it is all just stock photography of US planes. Finding the footage for Soviet planes wouldn't have been easy. They also sort of explain the US markings on the planes by saying that the enemy is using US uniforms and markings. In any case since there is no reliable source for that claim I removed it. --MadScientistX11 (talk) 04:54, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed part of Sentence about use of Soviet Planes 

message: Someone recently made some changes to the article that were not constructive (removing a link to the article on stock footage) and also unsourced POV  e.g., adding "But the reality is much more complicated than that." to the section that discusses the meaning of the film.  First, it's not even clear to me exactly what "But the reality is much more complicated than that" even means and second whatever it means there is no source provided for this statement. I'm reverting those changes. --MadScientistX11 (talk) 13:46, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing Unsourced POV Changes 

message: Needs to be known.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:4000:62E0:415C:E582:A79E:5F19 (talk) 22:06, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added Analysis
Talk:Hans Luedtke

message: Luedke's patents for keyboards are the earliest I find claiming use of nested, hexagonal touch pieces intended for tunings with different numbers of notes, though Dreschke (1846) and Nordbo (1916) claimed them for whole tone keyboards with notes duplicated to improve fingering consistency.Mireut 19:40, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Susan Haack

message: I'm new to Wikipedia, and I don't know much about Susan Haack, but the two paragraphs added on Nov 15 by 83.103.40.149 strike me as clearly non-NPOV, so I've reverted the article to the previous version by Bluebot. If the promotion of Evidence and Inquiry is genuinely regarded as controversial by the academic community, these paragraphs ought to be sourced and rewritten in neutral language. - 70.104.131.219 19:58, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:ALCO DL-109

message: The last DL109 was New Haven 0716. It was scrapped in the early 1970s. --SSW9389 22:30, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: has C&NWRy drawings and spec sheets for their loco’s, that’s where most of this comes from. Sammy D III (talk) 19:18, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox 

message: All four booster units were built to specification DL-108, note that their serial numbers are sequential. This was confirmed earlier this year with the Southern Yahoo Group as a source. The last DL-108 was built as a demonstrator/loaner while Southern's first two DL-108s were being rebuilt because of engine vibration problems. The other demonstrator loaner unit was the last DL-107 that was sold to the Rock Island. The final DL-108 was upgraded to specification DL-110 before sale to the Southern. --SSW9389 14:56, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alco Demonstrators/Loaners 
Talk:Ontario Tech University

message: UoIT has made edits to this article in the past, see 2014 where User:UOIT Web Team made promotional edits and User:SyedaF. Since then, accounts with no edits other than to this article have added promotional information. Chess (talk) (please use  on reply) 22:21, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI tag (October 2021)
Talk:1952 Groundhog Day tropical storm

message: Since it was a tropical storm, the correct name should be 1952 Groundhog Day Tropical Storm. Jdorje 21:21, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I disaggree. 1952 Groundhog Day Tropical Storm is too wordy. Remove tropical. Mentioning it in the article should be sufficient. -- Hurricane Eric - my dropsonde - archive 22:40, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move 

message: This article isn't bad.  It needs better wikification, more on the impact, maybe a few more records listed. Jdorje 07:33, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, there is very little notable information here. Jdorje 01:12, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: ...and virtually no references.  Thegreatdr 19:56, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Todo

message: It seems to me that as the storm became extratropical at 0000 UTC on Feb. 4, the dissipation date should be listed as the 4th. Unless, of course, it became extratropical by 0000 UTC. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 03:41, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, we know at 0000 UTC, it was an extratropical cyclone. Therefore, it must have become an extratropical cyclone slightly before then, as ex. transition takes a while. That's why it should be the 3rd. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 03:43, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: True, although we should really be following the official designations; thus, if it was officially deemed ET on February 4, then it officially dissipated on that day. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 03:54, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That's not how the NHC does it. Hurricane Frances became an EC at 0000 on September 9, but they say it lasted until the 8th. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 04:01, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Good enough for me. You win. :) –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 04:02, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dissipation date
Talk:List of speeches given by Adolf Hitler

message: Please add any of Adolf Hitler's speeches to Wikisource and link them to the main article page.  Thank you WritersCramp 02:15, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: How You Can Help

message: This seems more of a Wikisource article. Ulritz 16:14, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seperate article? 

message: The links to EN Wikisource for the speeches point to unborn pages. --Walter 21:06, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  wikisource: no speeches 

message: There's another speech Hitler gave on 29 April 1937 at Ordensburg, Vogelsang. This one is not yet on the list; it was a secret speech, but the audio recording was not destroyed during WOII and still exists (according to the Dutch book Nazi-Duitsland en de Joden. --62.194.194.24 (talk) 17:18, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional Speech 

message: Hi. Does anyone else find this article's current title, "List of Adolf Hitler speeches" either ambiguous (in the sense that it doesn't indicate whether the speeches are by or are about Hitler, or both) and/or ungrammatical ("Adolf Hitler" isn't an adjective)..?  If so, how about "List of speeches given by Adolf Hitler" or possibly something else?  The same query about "List of Adolf Hitler books" is posted here.  Sardanaphalus (talk) 00:40, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: This link should help:
https://archive.org/details/Hitler_Speeches
178.24.101.44 (talk) 19:19, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Someone just copy Archive.org's list of Hitler speeches 

message: When British politicians alleged that Hitler was an enemy of Britain Hitler sent a letter to Lord Rothermere stating that he had presented between four and five thousand speeches and that none of them contained anything against Britain or its interests.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.129.96.235 (talk) 21:20, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hitler and Brittain 

message: this link to a puported wiki thing is dead
https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Zeughaus:_Address_to_the_Heldengedenktag
--23.119.204.117 (talk) 18:34, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  dead link 

message: Here it is a brief quote
"Sie haben früher alle gelacht, diese Juden. Sie haben das für einen Spaß gehalten. Ja, sie lachen heute nicht mehr. Sie wissen, es ist ein blutiger Ernst geworden."
Rough translation
"Earlier they all laughed, these jews. They thought it was a joke. But today they don't laugh anymore. They know it's become bloody serious." Famemsm (talk) 13:04, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: January 30, 1939. Herostratus (talk) 18:17, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speech when and where? 

message: I bolded links to existing articles (and did some minor format cleanups). It's a pretty busy list and I think the ones that have articles should stand out more. Open to discussion, Herostratus (talk) 08:41, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  bolded links
Talk:Main Directorate of Information of the Polish Army

message: This article is my first and probably, it needs repairs
: Good job, nonetheless. Please consider registering, and try to link this article from appopriate places like the article on History of Polish Intelligence Services - so "what links here" is not as empty (if it is empty, it means it will be very hard for people to find this article). Redirects from abbreviations and English translations would also be useful.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 19:01, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: My first

message: I have attempted to wikify the article. However, I don't know the intended meanings of the following highlighted words:
*establish and run nets of secret informers amongst soldiers and officers in side army structure
*Oddział 5 - Revisions, apprehensions, establishing, external observation
*'Commendatory'
Avalon 01:00, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Uncertain

message: The Polish name is a disaster, who can read it, the more memorize it?
Xx236 12:30, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  English name? 

message: Why the categories are Polish intelligence agencies or Military intelligence agencies, when this Main Directorate was responsible for military counterintelligence??????  For Military intelligence from 1944 - 1990 was responsible 2nd Directorate of General Staff of the Polish Army"   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.255.69.161 (talk) 17:36, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ray Evernham

message: Most of the information in this article was apparently taken from http://www.evernhammotorsports.com/main.cfm?pagename=re_bio and will subsequently need to be removed.  Actually, most of this article is verbatim from that link.
I think an appropriate structure would be
Overview,
Childhood,
Racing Involvement,
Hendrick Motorsports,
Dodge's NASCAR Involvement,
Evernham Motorsports
Of course, there are subsections to each (refuse to lose, rainbow warriors, bill elliot, kasey kahne, etc) but I think it would be a start.  I'll see if I can work up a draft next week. Nmjw 16:35, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Gelatin dessert

message: I'm not sure who created the link to the German-language wikipedia article on de:Gelee (and why), but Gelee is actually a much broader term, used not only for gelatin desserts but also for aspic similar (see 1st pic). I suggest a link to de:Götterspeise instead.
— Tauriel-1 (☎) 00:17, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to German wikipedia 

message: http://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=hvd.rsmcy4;view=1up;seq=380  RPSM (talk) 00:14, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recipe for Calves foot jelly as a dessert 

message: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3crvEgencos 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7pdZ1av3QSo
Definition of jelly in English
RPSM (talk) 17:13, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Examples of JELLY being used as a name of dessert in US English 

message: Regional names
* In many of the Commonwealth nations and in Ireland, gelatin desserts are called jelly.
* In the United States and Canada, gelatin desserts are sometimes colloquially called jello or sometimes gelatin, whereas "jelly" is a fruit preserve.
.................................................................................................................................................................end of quote
Not supported in any dictionary contradicted in fact. In Canada, Jello-O is marketed by Kraft foods as Jelly powder. 
Jelly powder is what Canadians call Jell-O in the packet. Jelly is the name of the dessert. It has something to do with Canada being a bilingual country. The French must correspond with the English. 
You can check for yourself what the labelling on Canadian Jelly Powder looks like - Gelée en poudre or Jelly powder here  
Children's rhymes from Canada
Jelly in the bowl Jelly in the bowl Wiggle-waggle wiggle-waggle Jelly in the bowl
RPSM (talk) 18:07, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Errors in text. Own research not supported by any dictionary

message: Why are these in this article? "Jelly" in North America (as demonstrated by these very definitions) is a fruit preserve that has nothing to do with gelatin. --Khajidha (talk) 01:16, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canadian and US definitions
Talk:Paul Francis Webster

message: Why isn't there any mention of what he was doing during WWII?  He was of prime age for combat and troop service?  At least what he was doing should be known to readers.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.0.203.190 (talk) 21:36, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

message: Has everyone forgotten the song "BELOVED" from the Student Prince - words by Paul Francis Webster and music by Nicholas Brodszky. Its a gem. It needs resurrecting by someone - maybe me!
Len Smith.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.188.111.78 (talk) 21:19, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The 18 March date is supported by various online refs.  But there are many others that say it happened on 22 March, e.g. , , , , .   Can anyone shed light on the true date?  --  JackofOz (talk) 00:10, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of death

message: I just spent a couple of hours tracking down songs for which he wrote lyrics, and adding Wikilinks where appropriate. When a song is from a film but doesn't have its own article, I linked it to the film. Almost always the song is mentioned in the article about the film. 
What a prolific genius this man was. Like many people, I had never heard of him before I got to this article. Lou Sander (talk) 16:21, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lyrics he wrote
Talk:Erastes Fulmen

message: Would very much appeciate it if someone could find, or create, a screenshot of Erastes Fullman and add it to the info box, thank you.
Beowulf314159 21:36, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo

message: _ _ The char hist needs fairly little expansion that i can see, but does need to illuminate his relationships to other characters more by wiki-lks to their character articles and less by telling their stories within his. 
_ _ I've little experience with these, but it seems to me that the portion of his chronology that we can know is one subtopic, and how he meshes with other characters to help drive the plot is another, and that they may well deserve separate sections.  Do we have some well accepted exemplars of good character articles identified? I should think these would be an important tool, to avoid the default "kid telling a movie" style. --Jerzy•t 14:55, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  General Direction
Talk:Dallas Austin

message: :Mind providing a single source that says he is? Otherwise, per Wikipedia:Verifiability, it can't go in Wikipedia, regardless of the truth of the statement. Sam Vimes 21:45, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: And is all true. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 210.54.195.197 (talk • contribs) 07:40, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Does not matter if no one else says he is. Sam Vimes 09:49, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Source

message: Shouldn't someone add what kind of person he is b/c of the rumour-story about Joss Stone, Christina Aguilera and others f*cking for tracks and then apologizing and telling it was all lie?
I mean... someone who tells such things must have a problem in his head, isn't it?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.242.242.118 (talk) 00:45, August 28, 2007 (UTC) 
:::OOORRR It could mean he was telling the truth, but then decided it was a better career move to retract the statement rather than risk being blacklisted by their record companies. Nathan86 (talk) 10:23, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  And what about his personality 

message: Can people PLEASE stop filling these up with their favourite artists? An artist is only a NOTABLE client if the song/s Dallas produced for them was/were big hit/s; they are only an associated act if they've had a long artistic relationship with Austin (like TLC and Monica). Nathan86 (talk) 10:26, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable clients & associated acts 
Talk:Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd

message: Anyone want to elaborate on the sword/shield concept?
:Have a look at Combe v Combe and Walton Stores v Maher. Wikidea 23:31, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Sword/shield

message: Is it really necessary to have that big chunk of quote in the Judgement section? It seems unsightly and unencyclopaedic. Might it be better to have a brief summary of the main points of the judgement, interspersed with short supporting quotes?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bunburya (talk • contribs) 16:03, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it's a leading judgment. It works like a casebook. Wikidea 23:29, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

text: Hughes v Metropolitan Railway took place in the 1870s, long before CLPT. LynwoodF (talk) 14:14, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Judgement
Talk:Alpine newt

message: *This article is based on a translation of the German Wikipedia article about this specimen. But notice that the paragraphs "life and habitat", "location" and "endangerment" have been changed since August (the date of translation). So, it's worth while visiting the german article again. Especially the paragraph "endangerment" here is a little confusing and strange to me. It refers to very subjective observations of one single person and doesn't deal with factors of endangerment in general! -- Fice, Nov. 25, 2005
Isn't the taxonomy a little out of date? As far as I know, Mesotriton alpestris is the commonly accepted name. --Cynops3 02:56, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
File talk:Fold-us-flag-animated.gif

message: Looks to me like there's an error here. Near the end, it looks like two steps happen at once. Can't fix it myself, since I don't know anything about flag folding or gif animations. Staecker 22:04, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like an "intentional mistake". The whole triangle folding process is meant to continue right along the folded strip until one triangle is left. It looks like either the animator got bored and skipped a few or thought the viewer would get bored. When I saw it, I though it was inexplicably folded in half after a number of triangles but the text doesn't suggest this. I might make a replacement if I get round to it. BigBlueFish 14:46, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yeah, that's correct about the "intentional mistake".  It was that way in the previous version of the animation, and I was too lazy to fix it when I did this version. SFT | Talk 03:33, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well that took less time than I thought! I've uploaded a new one made from scratch. As well as depicting all the stages, the dashed lines all look the same, and the folded parts look how they should (assuming every fold goes on top of the visible portion of the flag, which I think is correct). It's not precisely folded but at least the geometry is right now. I have an 800px Fireworks source file available on request. BigBlueFish 11:55, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Very nice work.  :)  SFT | Talk 19:06, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Mistake?
Talk:Fingilish

message: Should this be called Finglish or Pinglish? The name used in Iran is usually Pinglish between internet users. Also because the official english name of the languages is Persian, so mixing it would create Pingilish. 
I suggest that this article is renamed to Pinglish.Mahanchian 23:52, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Fingilish or Pingilish?

message: AS an active internet and sms user, i rarely heard of people calling it pinglish. it is fingilish because it is mixture of farsi and English . note that people inside Iran call their language Farsi not Persian.So i insist of using finglish instead of pinglish.
--Babakgh 22:27, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  fingilish, i insist

message: The redirect at the top which speaks of a pidkin language composed of Finnish and Latin is incorrect. That link leads to an article on a Finnish/English pidgin.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.96.238.53 (talk) 21:58, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: The redirect is wrong

message: I note that there is inconsistency in this article, since "Pingilish" is used as the preferred form within the article but the title is still spelled "Fingilish". Should this be altered to reflect common usage?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.194.105.170 (talk) 12:43, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fingilish or Pingilish? 

message: Fingilish versus Pinglish. Seeing as the article has been languishing in an unstandardised state for several years, I've decided to take it upon myself to standardise it. As Fingilish is the title of the article I will use that terminology at all points in the article where appropriate.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by IrishStephen (talk • contribs) 00:47, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  That old debate.
Talk:Monster Rancher 4

message: How come there's no subpart for the plot of the game?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.72.187.2 (talk) 07:14, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  No mention
Talk:Marcus Vick

message: I don't see any references providing information that Marcus Vick signed with Carolina at all. I've tried searching for it as well, and have found nothing. Can anyone provide a link to back this up?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.94.165.96 (talk) 22:20, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I looked and couldn't find anything so I have removed the claim. --B (talk) 22:52, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Carolina reference? 

message: I've turned MV2, which previously was a redirect pointing here, into a disambiguation page because the name isn't mentioned in this article and there are at least two other plausible intended targets. The name does seem to have been in use for Vick, though, so I wouldn't object to anyone restoring a mention and adding this article to the dab page accordingly. Pinging B, who created the redirect in 2009, in case they have any thoughts. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 10:11, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[MV2]]