Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Nevada/Archive 1

message: All of the USRD Clean-up Templates have been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. master sonT - C 16:48, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  TfD nomination of All USRD Clean-up Templates

message: In response to a few issues that came up, we are giving a reminder to all state highway wikiprojects and task forces:
# Each project needs to remain aware of developments at WT:USRD and subpages to ensure that each project is aware of decisions / discussions that affect that project. It is impossible to notify every single project about every single discussion that may affect it. Therefore, it is the state highway wikiproject's responsiblity to monitor discussions.
# If a project does not remain aware of such developments and complains later, then there is most likely nothing USRD can do about it.
# USRD, in most to nearly all cases, will not interfere with a properly functioning state highway wikiproject. All projects currently existing are "properly functioning" for the purposes mentioned here. All task forces currently existing are not "properly functioning" (that is why they are task forces). Departments of USRD (for example, MTF, shields, assessment, INNA) may have specific requirements for the state highway wikiprojects, but complaints regarding those need to be taken up with those departments.
# However, this is a reminder that USRD standards need to be followed by the state highway wikiprojects, regardless of the age of the wikiproject.
Regards, Rschen7754 (T C) 05:30, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reminder from USRD

message: I've gone through and made sure every NV SR article in the post-1970s numbering scheme has an infobox.  Articles that were lacking an infobox got length and termini info added to them, at a minimum.  For many of these such articles, I rewrote what little info there was to sound more like an encyclopedia entry and less like a list of random facts.  Also, I've gone through the browsing of the infoboxes and made sure the prev/next links point to actual SR articles, not redirects to SR numbers which we haven't verified actual existence (143, 587, 704, etc.).  This should make the browsing smoother for the user. --Ljthefro (talk) 10:06, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: NV SR Infoboxes

message: As you may have heard, we at the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial Team recently made some changes to the assessment scale, including the addition of a new level.  The new description is available at WP:ASSESS.
*The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.  
*The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.  
*A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.  
Each WikiProject should already have a new C-Class category at :Category:C-Class_articles.  If your project elects not to use the new level, you can simply delete your WikiProject's C-Class category and clarify any amendments on your project's assessment/discussion pages.  The bot is already finding and listing C-Class articles. 
Please leave a message with us if you have any queries regarding the introduction of the revised scheme.  This scheme should allow the team to start producing offline selections for your project and the wider community within the next year.  Thanks for using the Wikipedia 1.0 scheme! For the 1.0 Editorial Team, §hepBot (Disable) 21:28, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes to the WP:1.0 assessment scheme

message: This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 03:41, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP 1.0 bot announcement 

message: I'd like to propose a change to the name of this task force. The current name of "Nevada State Routes" is a bit too specific, and the scope of articles tagged under this project now includes US and Interstate highways. A rename to "Highways in Nevada" would be more representative of the scope. -- LJ ↗ 05:14, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I am going to move forward with a project name change "Nevada Roads", which reflects the scope and is similar to the parent project "U.S. Roads". -- LJ ↗ 19:59, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed change to project name 

message: There is currently a discussion taking place at WT:HWY regarding the potential use of coordinates in highway articles. Your input is welcomed. --Rschen7754 01:58, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: RFC on coordinates in highway articles