lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Shawano County, Wisconsin

message: Wondering how to edit this U.S. County Entry?
The WikiProject U.S. Counties standards might help.
I removed a reference to www.shawano-wisconsin.com. It is not a locally run website and seems to be a front or cover for the extremist group SIST. Speed.Clutch (talk) 14:18, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Isaac Barrow

message: The infobox on this page has been removed. Please discuss for and against removal. To remind
you what it looked like, here is a sample:
Please discuss to reach a consensus bunix 12:45, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Infobox looks good idea to me. JackyR | Talk 15:32, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox

message: Where the hell is Isaac Barrow's discovery of the fundamental theorem??? He's the father of calculus!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.69.190.75 (talk) 23:18, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I just edited to adress this concern. While Barrow did discover the FTC, sometimes things are named for people who extended the scheme. For example, while Dirac discusses the path integral first, Feynman developed it to the point where it was useful. In this regard, Barrow is like Dirac and Newton like Feynman.Likebox (talk) 00:35, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discovery of FTC 

message: The page states that Barrow "lectures for 1667 were published in the same year, and suggest the analysis by which Archimedes was led to his chief results."  Does anyone have any additional information on this?  Are the 1667 lectures online? Tkuvho (talk) 14:25, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  lectures on archimedes 

message: Barrow died at the age 46. It would be worth mentioning what he died from  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.50.99.110 (talk) 23:06, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Death
Talk:Canadian County, Oklahoma

message: This article now meets the requirements for Class C. Bruin2 (talk) 01:14, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Article classification
Talk:Cleveland County, Oklahoma

message: This article meets the requirements for C class. I have  made the change for WP: Oklahoma. Bruin2 (talk) 00:38, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Also reclassified to C class for WikiProject U.S. Counties. Bruin2 (talk) 00:56, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Article classification
Talk:Coal County, Oklahoma

message: This article meets the requirements for Class C. Bruin2 (talk) 15:27, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Article classification
Talk:Cotton County, Oklahoma

message: This article meets the requirements for Class C. Bruin2 (talk) 15:30, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Article classification
Talk:Cimarron County, Oklahoma

message: According to the brochure I picked up in Boise City, Cimarron County is the only county in Oklahoma without a single stop light.-WK-70.240.49.16 (talk) 03:11, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: No Stoplights

message: This article meets the requirements for class C. I havemade the change for WP:Oklahoma Bruin2 (talk) 14:49, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Reclassified for WikiProject U.S. Counties.Bruin2 (talk) 15:22, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Article class
Talk:Choctaw County, Oklahoma

message: This article meets the requirements for Class C. Bruin2 (talk) 15:20, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Article classification
Talk:Craig County, Oklahoma

message: This article meets the requirements for Class C. Bruin2 (talk) 16:13, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Article classification
Talk:Creek County, Oklahoma

message: Sufficient information has been added to move this to "C" class. Bruin2 (talk) 15:33, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Upgraded to C class for WikiProject U.S. Counties. Bruin2 (talk) 00:53, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Article reassessment

message: According to openstreetmap (which is trusted by Wikipedia) it has that Sand Springs is barely within the limits of Creek county. On google Maps ( i know not the best but just seeing what that has to offer) it has it within the borders of creek county (although it doesnt immediately show the county). But whilst Oklahoma Historical society only says Tulsa county. And the Oklahoma Postal Code Base says it’s within the borders of all 3 counties.I’ll wait till more opinion on this matter comes, but till then I’ll let I be. But If anyone want to put their opinion in this and help sort this out or contest the decision. references: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/184998#map=15/36.0745/-96.2046 https://ok.postcodebase.com/city/SAND%20SPRINGS Jerry Steinfield (talk) 05:34, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sand Springs limits
Talk:Custer County, Oklahoma

message: This article meets the requirements for Class C. Bruin2 (talk) 15:37, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Article classification
Talk:Delaware County, Oklahoma

message: Wondering how to edit this U.S. County Entry?
The WikiProject U.S. Counties standards might help.
The total population in this county in the 2000 census, was it 37077 or 31077?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zdtrlik (talk • contribs) 16:30, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article meets the requirements for Class C. Bruin2 (talk) 06:18, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Reclassified for WikiProject U.S. Counties. Bruin2 (talk) 15:40, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Article classification
Talk:Dewey County, Oklahoma

message: This article meets the requiremnts for Class C. Bruin2 (talk) 15:42, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Article classification
Talk:Ellis County, Oklahoma

message: This article meets the requirements for Class C. Bruin2 (talk) 21:19, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Article classification
Talk:Garfield County, Oklahoma

message: This article meets the requirements for Class C. Bruin2 (talk) 15:45, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Article classification
Talk:Garvin County, Oklahoma

message: This article meets the requirements for Class C.  Bruin2 (talk) 04:45, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Article reclassification
Talk:Grady County, Oklahoma

message: This article meets the requirements for Class C. Bruin2 (talk) 16:15, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Rerated for WikiProject U.S. Counties. Bruin2 (talk) 15:47, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Article classification
Talk:Grant County, Oklahoma

message: This article meets the requirements for Class C. Bruin2 (talk) 21:32, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Article classification
Talk:Harmon County, Oklahoma

message: Wondering how to edit this U.S. County Entry?
The WikiProject U.S. Counties standards might help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ram-Man (talk • contribs) 16:07, 2 October 2002 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article meets the requirements for Class C. Bruin2 (talk) 17:39, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Article reclassification
Talk:Haskell County, Oklahoma

message: This article meets the criteria for Class C. Bruin2 (talk) 21:26, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Article reclassification
Talk:Hughes County, Oklahoma

message: This article meets the requirements for C class. Bruin2 (talk) 16:29, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Article class
Talk:Jackson County, Oklahoma

message: This article meets the requirements for Class C.Bruin2 (talk) 20:06, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Article reclassifed
Talk:Jefferson County, Oklahoma

message: This article meets the criteria for Class C. Bruin2 (talk) 15:27, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Article class
Talk:Outagamie County, Wisconsin

message: The article about Greenville (community), Wisconsin that you removed is about the unincorporated community that is in the town of the same name. Thanks-RFD (talk) 16:19, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I thought unincorporated communities were notable and that Wikipedia also serves as a gazetteer.Thanks-RFD (talk) 18:44, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Wide and far reach consensus has determined that the tiniest communities are notable enough to permit an article if someone wants to spend the time to create an article about them. There are dozens if not 100 articles about Wisconsin unincorporated communities. The first unincorporated community in Wisconsin that I came across (several years ago already) consisted of a named place with a single bar and no houses. I started that article because I took pictures of the community while passing through. They don't belong on the town's article because they are specific to the community, not the town as a whole. Royalbroil 01:57, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: You are of course correct, but my argument here is not if an unincorporated community deserves it's own page, my argument is in the case of Greenville, there is nothing that separates the unincorporated community from the larger entity of the Town of Greenville.  Regardless, I'm not going to mess with anyone's work.  If you guys want to do the work of creating separate pages, I'll support you.  On a separate but related note, I saw that RFD added Binghamton and Five Corners to the list of communities but there are no pages for these communities yet.  Do you plan on adding pages for these two?  I'll be in that area all day today so I'll take some pictures if you need them.Kermit814 (talk) 13:37, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Greenville, Wisconsin unincorporated community

message: does anyone know what county it was before 1851? I am looking through the 1850 census to get population data on grand chute so i can add to the article. I have a website that mentions the census and gives a statistic, but i want to verify it. Ilovemacncheese2245 (talk) 22:09, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: i found it by looking through the list of communities in appleton, it was brown county before Ilovemacncheese2245 (talk) 22:14, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prior to 1850
Talk:Milwaukee County, Wisconsin

message: No history? Very strange for a place that has gone through considerable change, including restructuring of heavy industry in the 20th century, which caused a loss of jobs.Parkwells (talk) 14:01, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Started with the beginnings. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:49, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs history

message: I added Ottawa County, Michigan as an adjacent county to the east (across Lake Michigan). I did this because in Ottawa County's page, it lists Milwaukee County as an adjacent county to the west. LimonesMI (talk) 20:51, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adjacent counties
Talk:Menominee County, Wisconsin

message: I added some language to clarify the difference between the Tribal and public (non-Indian) parts of Menominee County/Indian Reservation.  Most of the county is off-limits to non-Indians, so I felt it important to point this out.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yooper04 (talk • contribs) 00:20, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Clarification of county status
Talk:La Crosse County, Wisconsin

message: 32.218.37.117, 32.218.32.64
This ip address is interested in removing information that has reliable references. But sources say clearly that Ed Gein was born in that County. The IP gives meaningless excuses to delete information that clearly has reliable references. --J34jhon (talk) 18:33, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Information that has reliable references.
Talk:Kenosha County, Wisconsin

message: Kenosha County is definitely NOT in Chicagoland. Wikipedia needs to check its sources before creating templates like this. WikiProjects Wisconsin and Illinois are terribly inaccurate. People in California or NYC or something shouldn't just make those kinds of inferences. (They also said that Round Lake Beach, IL had multiple suburbs in Wisconsin. I live in one of those towns and have never been to RLB. If we're a suburb of anything, it's Kenosha. I promptly deletted that template. It also said that Grayslake and McHenry were suburbs of RLB, but they are larger than RLB.) Please address this. The Person Who Is Strange 15:07, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Kenosha is NOT in Chicagoland!

message: First of all, thanks for eliminating the Round Lake Beach thing, although I grew up in Twin Lakes, I can count on my hand the number of times I've been there.  As for whether Kenosha Co. is in Chicagoland, I believe so.  Firstly, the U.S. census counts Kenosha Co as part of the Chicago metropolitan area.  Click here (the last line of the table), and here for a map.  Secondly, for as long as I can remember, people in my area have received Milwaukee and Chicago local stations on cable.  A few years ago, the cable company tried to take away the Chicago stations creating quite an uproar.  Eventually, they let us keep them.  Thirdly, Kenosha County has strong ties to our southern neighbors.  In my area, it seems that just as many people root for the Bears as for the Packers.  Also, companies in Lake Co., Illinois employ more Kenosha Co. residents than any other county.  To me, probably the most important factor is what the census does and they put Kenosha Co in Chicagoland, so I believe that it is.
Fay2 19:08, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Kenosha Co. is in Chicagoland
Talk:Climate change/Archive 1

message: (2019) Housekeeping note - This old archive likely begins in 2001 but this is a best guess because old version histories and talk page comments were not always curated for long term archival and even if they were, signing and timestamp protocols were in their infancy.  See WP:OLDEST.  This archive was somewhat re-constructed by importing deleted text from old versions to the extent available.  Some of these old versions do not appear in version history for the talk page, but in version history for Archive 3.  That particular one gets us up to 2003.  Early eds didn't really get archiving sorted out in what we think of as a "normal" way until Archive 4.  So this is the best we've got. If you can improve it, please do NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 00:58, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

message: at 22:24, April 3, 2002  created our article  as a stub.  I thought I'd add this note here in the archives to help give the chronology of comments a bit of context.  NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 12:59, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Climate Change article created April 3, 2002 

message: (This is an) Interesting link on CO2 sequesterization — Preceding unsigned comment added by maveric149 (talk • contribs) 14:50, April 16, 2002 (UTC) parenthetical added by me NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 21:07, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thread started on April 16, 2002
Talk:Analog signal

message: Sources: Some of an earlier version of this article was originally taken from Federal Standard 1037C in support of MIL-STD-188.
Now refactored a bit to flow better. Still needs more copyediting. -- The Anome 18:36, 29 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: An automated Wikipedia link suggester has some possible wiki link suggestions for the Analog article, and they have been placed on this page for your convenience.Tip: Some people find it helpful if these suggestions are shown on this talk page, rather than on another page. To do this, just add  to this page. — LinkBot 00:52, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[User:LinkBot/suggestions/Analog|Link suggestions]] 

message: It was formerly asserted that a microphone's operating mechanism is a variance of current caused by sound pressure. This is technically incorrect (compare Microphone), since it is not current that varies with the sound pressure, but voltage. I've made this correction in the article.
HarmonicSphere 03:03, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: To be strictly accurate, a varying magnetic field induces a current in a coil of wire.   All microphones that employ an electromagnetic principle thus induce a current in the electrical conductor be it a coil or a ribbon.  The only reason that a voltage also occurs is because the current is passed through a load resistor of some sort.  The only type of microphone that directly produces voltage variations that leaps to mind is the condensor microphone which requires an electrometer type circuit to produce a useable signal.  The article was originally correct and I have corrected the error 20.133.0.13 (talk) 08:21, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no longer a mention of microphones in the article. ~Kvng (talk) 18:46, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

text: There is no longer a mention of bandwidth in the article. ~Kvng (talk) 18:46, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Correction

message: There is an obvious problem on Modem that most people think a Modem converts digital signals to analog signals. The modem article is already too long to include a tutorial on the difference between analog and digital signals, and there isn't any good place to reference -- so any suggestions would be welcome.203.206.162.148 (talk) 08:01, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modem
Talk:Château d'Ussé

message: This article needs a photo of Château d'Ussé so that readers can appreciate similarities to the Disney versions.  In the meantime, a Google Image search will have to do.  Quicksilver 04:38, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs a photo
Talk:University of Southampton

message: This seems a long way to present all of the research institutes and it probably isn't up to date. Can anyone suggest a better way to present this? Aloneinthewild (talk) 18:02, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup of Research Institutes list 

message: This might just be me, but the rear left leg on the stag in the coat of arms looks a bit... mangled. Would anyone object if the leg were altered to look more like the original source image of the stag in this aspect. LordSeht (talk) 20:09, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I restored the original shape of the stag from the attributed work to fix the leg. I also added back the stag's pupil. Additionally, I restored the original aspect ratio of the book from the attributed work. I also added Tudor roses either side of the book to match the shield in the University of Southampton's logo. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Shield_of_the_University_of_Southampton.svg LordSeht (talk) 14:33, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coat of arms
Talk:Johnston County, Oklahoma

message: This article meets the requirements for Class C. I have made the change for WP:Oklahoma. Bruin2 (talk) 00:49, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Also changed class for WikiProject U.S. CountiesBruin2 (talk) 00:48, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Article classification
Talk:Kay County, Oklahoma

message: The 19:59, 29 May 2008 NE2 version of this article is translated into Chinese Wikipedia.--Wing (talk) 20:06, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Translation into Chinese Wikipedia

message: This article meets the requirements for Class C. Bruin2 (talk) 05:08, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Article classification
Talk:Kingfisher County, Oklahoma

message: I am looking for information on the housing authority for this county, and can't find a speck anywhere! If anyone could help me, plz email me at PetallessRose04@yahoo.com  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.12.90.63 (talk) 01:24, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Housing Authority??

message: This article meets the requirements for Class C. Bruin2 (talk) 17:43, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Article classification
Talk:Kiowa County, Oklahoma

message: The 19:36, 28 November 2009 Hu12 version of this article is translated into Chinese Wikipedia.--Wing (talk) 21:06, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Translation into Chinese Wikipedia

message: This article meets the requirements for Class C. I have made the change accordingly. Bruin2 (talk) 20:53, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Article classification
Talk:Latimer County, Oklahoma

message: This article meets the requirements for Class C. Bruin2 (talk) 02:34, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Article reclassification
Talk:LeFlore County, Oklahoma

message: This article meets the requirements for Class C. Bruin2 (talk) 02:00, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Article classification

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. Per consensus, use local name in absence of widely accepted usage. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 10:37, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Le Flore County, Oklahoma →  – An IP recently changed "Le Flore" to "LeFlore" within the article. They did a global replace are broke several links, so I reverted it. Their justification was that "LeFlore is one word - see LeFlore County websites". I haven't found any central county website, but there related ones such as the tax office and the Sheriff's dept. that don't have a space - which lends credibility to that postition. Other places, like the US Census (see sources in the article) have the space.
We have inconsistent usage in other titles - LeFlore County Courthouse and Cedar Lake (Le Flore County, Oklahoma), It also shows up in section headings of other articles and various categories. I'm not sure which way it should be, but everything should be made consistent.
This potentially goes beyond this one article, but is seems to me like discussing it here is best and then applying the outcome broadly to all occurrences of LeFlore County, Oklahoma throughout the project. MB 16:59, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Oklahoma has been notified of this discussion. UtherSRG (talk) 20:36, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 22 October 2022
Talk:Florence County, Wisconsin

message: I was on google maps earlier today and came across some wrong information that is referenced on your website.  I have filed error reports with google maps as well.  We have worked diligently with google maps in the past in order to keep our roads and maps as up-to-date as possible.
Your website talks about Florence County, Wisconsin.
It correctly lists:
Towns:  Aurora, Commonwealth, Fence, Fern, Florence, Homestead, Long Lake and Tipler
It incorrectly lists:
Unincorporated communities: Aurora, Commonwealth, Fence, Fern, Hematite, Pulp, Ridgetop, Spread Eagle, Tipler, Tyran
The errors:
-	None of the Townships within Florence County are incorporated.
-	Of the unincorporated communities that are listed on your website there are certain names that do not actually exist:
o	Hematite
o	Pulp
o	Ridgetop
o	Tyran
-	Spread Eagle is part of the Town of Florence. It is generally considered to be an area located on the map how it shows up in google maps.
Please help us clean-up the records for the Town.  If you have any questions, please contact us.
71.13.109.154 (talk) 18:55, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: In correct township listing
Talk:Dunn County, Wisconsin

message: So, there is a Mondovi, Wisconsin in Buffalo County, Wisconsin, but I also have a source that says there is a Mondovi in Dunn County, Wisconsin.  Can anyone verify this?--Hraefen Talk 17:16, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Two Mondovis in Wisconsin?
Talk:Dodge County, Wisconsin

message: Wondering how to edit this U.S. County Entry?
The WikiProject U.S. Counties standards might help.
MEOW  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.129.151.64 (talk) 23:04, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled