Talk:Time I

message: The genre war is the most pathetic part of all of Wikipedia; however, there can be no warring if there is no album. So I have removed the genres entirely since editors seem adamant on continuously changing the genres for an album that hasn't even been released. In the future, only genres with reliable sources will be allowed; all others removed. Reversions and genre warriors will be reported for vandalism. Do editors agree with me or not? Please comment below. – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 18:24, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I can agree with that. Backtable Speak to meconcerning my deeds. 01:31, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

text: Nice to see you again. But yeah, I probably wrote that too harshly. I used to be pretty annoyed by genre warring.  WP:OR and WP:OPINION versus WP:V. Reaching consensus on the talk page of which genres (if there're more than one or two) should be allowed in the infobox is the secret. – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 18:46, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre warring 

message: Hello everyone!
Usually i'm writing in the german Wikipedia, so therefore i don't know much about the laws concerning the use of album covers in the english Wikipedia. But now to my concern:
As you maybe know, the album cover of "Time" was already released, so should it not be uploaded here in the en:WP and shown in this Article ?
Here a link to the cover: http://img190.imageshack.us/i/timey.jpg/
Greetings, --Trollhead (talk) 21:46, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I personally don't see why it shouldn't be uploaded up on here. I would support it being uploaded. Backtable Speak to meconcerning my deeds. 22:48, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, so could you do that ? --Trollhead (talk) 23:04, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No, that cover is not officially released. The artist "leaked" it on his MySpace page, which upset Jari Mäenpää, who asked it to be removed immediately. The image you've linked to was uploaded in 2009, which definitely points to that leaked version. Also, Jari stated on his message board that the cover is still incomplete. Uploading the image onto either the US Wikipedia or Commons sites would be in violation of several copyright and fair-use laws. I don't know about the Germany Wikipedia, but if it follows similar traditional guidelines, then even having the image on the German Time article would be construed as original research, since there are absolutely no sites that will confirm that it is the cover. (Jari never confirmed it was the cover, he merely requested it be taken down and said the "cover"—could be any cover—is incomplete.) – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 00:03, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, sorry for my mistake, then. I don't think I knew all that when I approved it. Backtable Speak to meconcerning my deeds. 04:49, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No worries. I did a quick check on Wintersun news and messageboard before posting, just to make sure the cover hadn't been released and I wasn't aware of it. I just remember the leak being a big deal with Jari on the messageboards : ) – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 05:48, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, ok i see. No, the german wikipedia is concerning that even more strict than the english one. Covers are just allowed if they are so simple, that there is no need (in the opinion of the german law) to protect them. A good exmaple would be AC/DCs Back in Black. Just A Black Square with the AC/DC-Logo and the Album Name. So therefore this (or even the final cover) would never have a chance to be uploaded on the german wikipedia. And the second problem is, in the german Wikipedia are no articles allowed about themes which will happen in the future. Because of the fact, that "Time" isn't released yet there is also no article about it in the Wikipedia. But thanks for answering my questions. Let's hope that "Time" will be released soon ;) --Trollhead (talk) 11:20, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Album Cover 

message: According to one of Jari's latest posts, Times largest tracks can't be completed until all his plug-ins are released in 64-bit. – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 23:45, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, thank you for bringing that up here. That could be important for the article. Backtable Speak to meconcerning my deeds. 03:53, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: You're welcome. His posts are very informative. It'd probably be a little deviant from most articles on Wikipedia, but a good portion of the making of Time could be based on his posts. We also find out that he's been using Cubase 5 and a Mac, among other things. It's good stuff! – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 03:59, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delayed again...? 

message: Can we get a source that specifically states that the album will be released in two parts, and that the second release is actually the second half of the album, and not an extra release (like an entire acoustic version of the album as he has said could be possible)?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.36.1.208 (talk) 20:30, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Shure, here you are ;) . And now, everyone who feels to be called for this job: Go ahead ;) --Trollhead (talk) 18:07, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Album released in two parts 

message: Just thinking out loud, will there really be a need for two articles? The only differences between Time I and II will be artwork and release dates, possibly a few other things of note, but nothing that would really pad out an entire article. Time was always one album until it came time to fit the songs onto a CD, which proved impossible, and this allows Jari some more time to work on the other songs a bit longer—but meanwhile, he's now busy with concerts, rehearsals, and down-mixing music into a live-presentation format. So I'm wondering if maybe this article won't simply end up being Time I and Time II or similar. – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 21:11, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that for the meantime, Time II should not be a separate article, which is a no-brainer since there is only limited imformation about it available. I don't know about when there will be more information available, but two albums having the same article may not be unreasonable. Besides, Time was originally broadcasted as a single album, which it's not anymore. Although I will reserve further opinion until Time II has more information available, I can understand why you would suggest that the two albums have one article. Backtable Speak to meconcerning my deeds. 00:01, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two albums, one article? 

message: I think someone has messed up the introduction paragraph with album Reception section. Anyone can fix that?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mifzal (talk • contribs) 03:41, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: fixed --Львівське (говорити) 07:34, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction paragraph 

message: I personally hear nothing that even remotely resembles Melodic Death Metal on Time I. Screams and blast beats does not necessarily mean it's Death Metal, and there are no guitar riffs that I would associate with Melodic Death Metal. Neither is Power Metal really a proper way of describing it. It's Symphonic indeed, but not exactly Power. Although I personally find more traces of Black Metal than Death Metal on the record, I would personally suggests something along the line of "Extreme Symphonic Metal", or "Symphonic Extreme Metal".
I won't edit the article, but I thought I'd bring this up.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.22.97.13 (talk) 17:11, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia isn't for opinions. It's for sourced material. – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 19:08, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm with Keraunoscopia on this one. Wikipedia is a place for verifiable, reliable information, and not the subjective analyses of anyone and everyone to be on articles. Elsewhere on Wikipedia, there is needless controversy concerning musical genres, and as of this post, the controversy here has been surprisingly yet thankfully low, with only minor incidents. Backtable Speak to meconcerning my deeds. 22:48, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Melodic Death Metal is unfitting. 

message: Doesn't saying the album "ended up being marred by many delays" suggest that the late release somehow ruined it or made it worse, which is not the kind of objective writing an encyclopedia needs. Willknowsalmosteverything (talk) 18:51, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: "..Marred by many delays"

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Time I. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101126102617/http://www.wintermadness.net/ to http://www.wintermadness.net/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:38, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified