Talk:Shivraj Singh Chouhan

message: Please avoid to put information on talk pages or anywhere on Wikipedia, that is unacceptable and falls under 
*Wikipedia:No personal attacks
*WP:NOTPROMOTION
*WP:PRIVACY
for more awareness about how to behave at talk pages, please go for WP:TPG --Dr.pragmatist (talk) 07:09, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do not discuss apart [[WP:TPG]] 

message: Please, add a controversial section in which irregularities of illegal mining dumper scam and other allegation which are under investigation are mentioned. --Prabhatbaghel (talk) 11:15, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: As of now important controversies have been mentioned by some user. But do not expect to add news materials. Thanks--25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ☣ 15:10, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add controversial section 

message: Digvijay singh is a leader of rival party and his accusation do not form the basis of any indulgence of shivraj singh chouhan involvment in scam . The matter is in court and he is not even accused nor found guilty . Then why this section is involved in his personal biography ? Criticizing state government does not means the person is involved in wrong doings .Why then accusations are used as basis for adding a section ? there is a leader called [Arvind kejriwal] several accusations have been put by his fellow members but no controversy section is included on that page .malign anybody name just because some political rival  has accused is not good sign of quality articles .They look good on news site but wikipedia is not a new website .  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.38.200.66 (talk) 17:37, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi! It's not about Digvijaya Singh but the fact has been stated. Request you to please refrain from removing the content as all of it is properly referenced. You can post on the Talk page first and let other editors decide on it.Katyaan (talk) 05:28, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

text: Hi did any official facts accuse him of corruption ? If not why these are put here ? all reference material is accusation .If accusation form basis of content then why  various leaders pages are refrained from it ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.38.200.66 (talk) 11:57, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: None of them is accusation but all these issues are under investigation. Further, you are free to add the content if you feel the whole truth has not been out there. E.g. in first paragraph under corruption charges, it has been mentioned that he and his wife were accused but later court gave them the clean chit. Katyaan (talk) 08:31, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove controversial section 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Shivraj Singh Chouhan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061006043632/http://www.bubhopal.nic.in/ to http://www.bubhopal.nic.in/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060615194228/http://164.100.24.208/ls/lsmember/biodata.asp?mpsno=96 to http://164.100.24.208/ls/lsmember/biodata.asp?mpsno=96
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060307024522/http://www.mpinfo.org/english/cm/aboutcm/aboutcm.htm to http://www.mpinfo.org/english/cm/aboutcm/aboutcm.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:37, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:56, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion