lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of airports by ICAO code: U

message: Preamble: I am aware this matter is heavily linked to politics, still I absolutely wish to stay out of the muddy waters of politics. I am only trying to get a correct encyclopedia.
As I understand things:
* certain territories, formally part of Ukraine, are presently under control of Russia. The Crimea peninsula in particular;
* Russia now controlling these areas, it treats them like being Russian, and accordingly assigns Russian ICAO-style codes to airports in the Crimea;
* Some of these changes have been reflected on Wikipedia articles, for example the one on Simferopol International Airport where the ICAO code has been changed from UKFF to URFF, with a reference to the Russian AIP;
* the authority of Russia over said territories, and their airports, is not universally acknowledged;
* the Russian "ICAO" codes are not recognised by ICAO;
* The Russian ICAO-style codes are not really ICAO codes, and should not be published as encyclopedical.
So what do we do now?
* mention no ICAO codes at all?
* mention the real ICAO codes, which are in reality not used by anyone?
* mention the Russian pseudo-codes, which are in use though only by one authority, but are not recognised by ICAO?
Again, please let us NOT enter into politics!
Jan olieslagers (talk) 09:10, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I would say we mention the "russian" codes (they exist so no need to pretend they dont) but just place a footnote saying these have been allocated by the Russian Federation and also mention the ICAO code as again it is still official. MilborneOne (talk) 11:35, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Having thought over my own question, I am afraid I do not agree. Yes the Russian pseudo-codes do exist, that does not make them encyclopedical. Just because someone says 2+2=5, that doesn't make us support this "fact" on WP, does it? There seems to be no really satisfactory answer, the least unsatisfactory I can think of is to not mention any ICAO code formally, and referring to both real ICAO and fake Russian codes in a footnote. Jan olieslagers (talk) 16:38, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  ICAO codes in Ukraine
Talk:List of airports by ICAO code: V

message: Actually, "Nay Pyi Taw Airport" (Nay Pyi Taw Airport) has ICAO code 'VYNT' and IATA code 'NYT', and "Namtu Airport" (Namtu Airport) has no ICAO code and has IATA code 'NMT'. But [] says "Namtu Airport" is IATA=NMT/ICAO=VYNT, it is likely wrong, i think. - Hhswp (talk) 16:13, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: About "Namtu Airport" and "Naypyidaw Airport"
Talk:1st Army (Wehrmacht)

message: ISBN 9783764808716 - "Verbande und Truppen der deutschen Wehrmacht und Waffen-SS 1939-1945"
its a book about this, i think it would be a good source for the article. EpicPlayer12235 (talk) 16:47, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  can someone add this in ''bibliography''
Talk:Alexander Hamilton U.S. Custom House

message: Do you think a bit of the text could be moved over to Four Continents (French), which would then eliminate the need to keep category:Sculptures by Daniel Chester French here (since there's a standalone article)? This is such a beautiful articles, thanks for your hard work! ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:17, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: , Thanks! I think the text can be copied, but the text about Four Continents in this article is supposed to be only a summary, with me adding more details later. epicgenius (talk) 14:35, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: , Yup! Just a summary here is perfect. The details can go on the standalone article. Thanks so much! ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:43, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you still want to keep the 'Sculptures by Daniel Chester French' and P. Brothers category here? ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:47, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: , no, let's remove these. epicgenius (talk) 14:59, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: , I see you've removed. Thank you! ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:54, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Four Continents'' 

message: I’ve updated a couple details of the Heye center, the previous floor plan referenced is out of date. “Future café” has been the Mili Kapi café since pre-pandemic and is currently in the process of re-opening. The gift store occupies the entirety of the cashier’s office on the 2nd floor. 38.127.143.248 (talk) 15:26, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks good to me. Thanks for updating the article. 38.127.143.248 (talk) 20:36, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Whoops. I meant to reply to this but didn't notice I had been logged out while visiting the Smithsonian. Epicgenius (talk) 20:43, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Floor plan
Talk:9th Army (Wehrmacht)

message: Two pages in Beevor are given as footnotes. Can't find either. Can anybody supply the exact quotes, maybe the chapter, too? Especially regarding the pocket being " ... east of Frankfurt", since this is simply wrong - that would place it east of the Oder River, that the 9th Army was running away from, headed westward in general.
--KapHorn (talk) 22:31, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  References to Beevor 

message: There was also a 9th Armee existing during WWI. Same army?
Georgejdorner (talk) 15:03, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: World War I service
Talk:8th Army (Wehrmacht)

message: This article should be split in two. In World War I it was an imperial army and in World War II an Nazi army. A considerable difference if you ask me.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.87.73.104 (talk) 15:12, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Split

message: Concur this article should be split.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Major Confusion (talk • contribs) 00:37, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Split

message: Removed World War I section to a new page 8th Army (Imperial Germany)to assist in clarifying the two distinct organizations. Major Confusion (talk) 03:22, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Split

message: I apologize; I don't know how to put the necessary two empty lines above the stub template. Could someone do it for me?Widgetdog (talk) 16:25, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stub 

message: Alright, i fix it. Now this article of 8th Army is all about German Wehrmacht's 8th Army, not German Empire's 8th Army anymore. Minhdead2205 (talk) 14:39, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fix it
Talk:On the Razzle (play)

message: "The play is currently running at the..."
With all due respect to the terrific Oregon Shakespeare Festival, I think there's a Wikipedia guideline against inserting advertising into an article. This is an encyclopedia; as such, its articles should speak about the play itself and its relationship to theatre and to Stoppard's other work. At any given time now and in the future--including long after you, the author, have left this world--there will be productions of this work occurring in various locations across the world. Each production will open and at some point, close. It is not practical or relevant to insert a plug for one or more such productions. The article needs to be about the play itself--period.
66.26.79.152 17:51, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertising in article 
Talk:Panzer Corps Feldherrnhalle

message: That the "Panzerkorps Feldherrnhalle" a unit of SA-employes was, is simply wrong!
The Korp was founded from damaged "Wehrmacht-Einheiten", so from 60. Division at Stalingrad. The SA was till 1934 only a "Hilfspolizei" deputypolice and that only in Germany. You can read this, when you visit the german sites of wikipedia, there are the sources too. 
Greetings from Germany
tomac41  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.182.143.217 (talk) 11:48, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Feldherrnhalle was not a "SA-Unit" 

message: I was under the impression that the SA was completely replaced by the SS.
167.128.198.186 (talk) 17:01, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry to disappoint you, but the SA was active till 1945. It just did not have much say in Germany after June 1934. --18:05, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  SA wasn't around by this time
Talk:Lethbridge Viaduct

message: Does someone have a present day picture of the bridge? --Qyd 05:24, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have one, but it's not very good quality. --Kmsiever 15:50, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have one I took from a week or so ago, and uploaded to Wikimedia commons. Not the best, but more recent than most. Can be found here: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Lethbridge_Viaduct1.jpg Lonelywurm 04:33, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, added to article. --Qyd 05:16, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Happy to help. Lonelywurm 05:27, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture
Talk:Aéroports de Montréal

message: So they get archived:
* Trudeau: http://www.admtl.com/UploadedImages/ADMTL/Affaires/ImmobilierIndustriel/Dorval_sept09-A(1).jpg
** Trudeau French: http://www.admtl.com/UploadedImages/ADMTL/Affaires/ImmobilierIndustriel/Trudeau_juillet2010-F(1).jpg
* Mirabel: http://www.admtl.com/UploadedImages/ADMTL/Affaires/FretAerien/YMXmars2008-A.JPG
** Mirabel French: http://www.admtl.com/UploadedImages/ADMTL/Affaires/ImmobilierIndustriel/YMXmars2008_F.gif
WhisperToMe (talk) 20:20, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Maps
Talk:American Music Award

message: Can we add a criticisms section? The AMA doesn't reward talented musicians but they reward entertainers of the easily entertained.
99.238.84.209 (talk) 15:43, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: AMA is a joke

message: That was posted by me, i forgot to login :)
--Bakkouz 10:00, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: If somebody's feeling ambitious... I del this from Johnny Cash, so you might start there.  TREKphiler hit me ♠  05:38, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: <nowiki>[[Category:American Music Award winners]]</nowiki>

message: Hey everyone! I hope you're as excited for the AMAs as I am! Today is the last day to vote! so please go to www.amavote.com and vote for your favorite artists and bands there!
You can vote in all categories: Pop/Rock, Country, Rap/Hip-Hop, Soundtracks, Alternative Rock, Adult Contemporary, Latin, Contemporary Inspirational, and my new favorite TModbile Breakthrough Artist!!! I definitely voted for P-more!!!!!!!!!
Vote for Chris Brown for Fave Male Artist!!!!!!!!!!
Vote for Mariah Carey for Fave Female Artist!!!!
Vote for Daughtry for Fave Band!!!!!!
Whoooooo! So get out there and vote
www.amavote.com  —Preceding unsigned comment added by SUPERFAN01 (talk • contribs) 21:22, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 2008 AMAs - LAST CHANCE TO VOTE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

message: Hello.  I have proposed at  that we add the following two awards to Category 8 of WP:BAND, reflecting that they are major awards:  the American Music Awards and the MTV Video Music Awards.  
Feel free to join that discussion with your thoughts (whatever they may be), or simply follow it, if you like.  Thanks.--Epeefleche (talk) 07:40, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Major Awards?

message: I've reverted an edit that restored personal opinion about the AMAs being more representative than other awards, use of the WP:PEACOCK term "major," stating unequivocally without citation that it is regarded as equivalent to the Billboard Awards and Grammy Awards, that the Grammys "compete for prestige and television ratings," and several other personal opinions. --Tenebrae (talk) 00:32, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: POV

message: I'm having a hard time understanding what the author is trying to say there. I think some nouns are missing. 
Also, these awards are much closer to the Billboard awards as they're based on popularity. There's little similarity between the AMAs and the Grammys.
But what are the airplay and sales numbers based on? I think it used to be based on Cashbox magazine's end-of-year rankings (then people would vote on the top 3 in each category). Is it still the same way?
2602:306:CD9B:E9A0:5560:1889:FD95:84E (talk)  ES  —Preceding undated comment added 01:03, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  The 'Differences between the AMAs and Grammy Awards' Section
Talk:Miracles of Gautama Buddha

message: What not neutral about this? Its taken from the Pali Canons or the Buddhist scriptures
--138.88.28.96 05:30, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality 

message: Hmm... Buddha walked on water, eh? WHERE could I have heard THAT before?
Oh wait, didn't Jesus supposedly do that? 
Interesting...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.7.31.125 (talk) 19:39, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think its worth mentioning that Buddha lived aproximately 5 to 6 centuries before Jesus.85.167.132.128 (talk) 17:16, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Buddhism/Christiantiny? 

message: This whole section is created by self published web articles.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.188.230.214 (talk) 16:10, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  None of the sources here are reliable and are wrong 
Talk:Border

message: Not offered, and that renders the article almost useless.
What is the legal definition of "political border"? The UN probably has the relevant definition.
Do both sides need to agree on a boundary to make it become a border? Are de facto boundaries either of unrecognised states, or of states with unresolved territorial conflicts, "borders" under international law? So, is border a legal term with a precise definition, beyond its daily-use meaning? Arminden (talk) 08:24, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition of political border?
Talk:Hello Nurse (Animaniacs)

message: I added a picture.
Is there a reason this page is categorized "Fictional Polish-Americans"?  --24.13.96.37 05:36, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I also wondered this, but I assumed that Hello Nurse is Polish. --Think Fast 05:06, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed it. Someone made her a Fictional Dutch Americans, and that got changed to Fictional Polish-Americans, both without any sources. Probably some Dutch guy making a joke, and a Polish guy liking it. The first edit was made by someone who received several warnings not to vandalise on other cartoon pages. --81.175.93.238 19:21, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Airport improvement fee

message: This article is hopelessly vague.  Every airport in the world collects some sort of charge from its passengers.  The list is apparently trying to collect those that make the passengers pay it (or part of it) in cash, but it's not up to date and most of those that do (eg. all Indonesian airports) don't call it an "Airport Improvement Fee". Jpatokal (talk) 08:44, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too vague? 

message: This article intends to explain 
:a) the Airport Improvement Fee (charged by a business or a goverment),
:b) the Passenger Service Charge for using an airport (charged by a business) - maybe plus a security charge (charged by a business or a goverment), and 
:c) the departure tax for leaving a country (charged by the government). 
:I'd like to see two additional articles (for b and c) or a renaming towards "Passenger charges in aviation" or something like that. --Scriberius (talk) 16:51, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Content
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/The Bread

message: User:The Bread
Help:	1
Image:	11
Mainspace	980
Talk:	413
Template talk:	7
Template:	36
User talk:	142
User:	247
Wikipedia talk:	51
Wikipedia:	250
avg edits per article	4.49
earliest	00:22, 2 February 2006
number of unique articles	476
total	2138
The Bread's editcount summary stats as of 05:35, November 7th 2006, using Interiot's wannabe Kate's tool. (aeropagitica) 05:38, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Airport of entry

message: "Airport of entry" is an international aviation term, NOT US-centric. That said, the two articles need to be merged, as they cover identical ground. Choose one term that is "worldwide" in scope and merge.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.185.109.130 (talk) 19:15, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: yep, i totally agree with that. i mean: there are more us airports listed than in the whole lot of europe. but - because of the "small" european countries compared to the large size of the usa - almost every mid-sized european airport is an international one, and even major european airports are missing. scotland has 4 entries, france only 3 - with france having more than 10 times more people living there... And hence, the whole article should be rewritten. an explaining article wihtout any kind of list - that would be something more serious. 91.17.30.7 (talk) 18:42, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Airport of entry

message: Shouldn't Puerto Rico be included under the United States' section?  The current state suggests that PR has its own customs and immigration which to my knowledge is false as it's technically part of the United States (not the debate here).  
To that end, shouldn't non-US airports that provide US customs and immigration be included under the United States as well (such as Shannon and Dublin, and the various others in Canada and the Caribbean)? --MPD T / C 05:02, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  US section
Talk:Approach lighting system

message: Hi, just wanted to inform that (a small category) :commons:Category:Approach Lighting Systems has been created on Commons in case any of the images there could be of relevance in this article of useful to link to. -- Slaunger (talk) 21:35, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category on Commons 

message: Just a short hint: In the en-article SALS means Simple Approach Lighting System; in de-wiki it means Short Approach Lighting System!? Greetings Redlinux···→ 12:53, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: SALS

message: The article describes what a Decision bar is for, but does not describe how to identify it.  I did all my IFR work at small airports, so did not often have the pleasure of a rabbit, let alone such a luxury.  Is that a decision bar visible in the photo?  —EncMstr (talk) 21:48, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Decision Bar
Talk:Duncan Browne

message: Can someone with more knowledge than myself please add one?  Thanks.
Rodparkes (talk) 07:07, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Discography

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Diannaa (talk) 22:04, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:Baggage carousel

message: There is remarkably little information on these devices on this page, considering they are a key fixture at airpots. When were they first used/created? Who makes them? Etc.  Suggesting that this page be marked as a stub, I'm just not confident enough to make that judgement myself. 98.11.124.129 (talk) 00:50, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stub?
Talk:Baggage reclaim

message: For editors who may be inclined to expand this article, here are some potential sources, copied from an AfD for this article:
*Books:
** Airport engineering By Norman Ashford, Paul H. Wright. p. 316
** The modern airport terminal: new approaches to airport architecture By Brian Edwards. p. 116
** Planning and Design of Airports, Fifth Edition By Robert Horonjeff, Francis McKelvey, William Sproule. p. 412.
*Scholarly articles:
** "Baggage Claim Area Congestion at Airports: An Empirical Model of Mechanized Claim Device Performance", Atef Ghobrial, Carlos F. Daganzo, Tarif Kazimi, in Transportation Science Vol. 16, No. 2, May 1982, pp. 246-260
** "Maximum Inventories in Baggage Claim: A Double Ended Queuing System", James J. Browne, James J. Kelly, Philippe Le Bourgeois, in Transportation Science, Vol. 4, No. 1, February 1970, pp. 64-78
** "The use of queueing models in design of baggage claim areas at airports", WA Barbo, in Transportation Research Board, 1967.
 --Lambiam 13:01, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potential sources for expansion
Talk:Package-merge algorithm

message: I was in the process of adding several related topics. I kept this one short and then added the others. When I came back, there was this notice. I am going to add the information now. :) Sorry, Oravec 06:13, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Shouldn't "importance" and "verify" be removed now? They were put up there some time ago, before the page was expanded to include so much detail and so many references. Vegasprof 10:09, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Ok Now, I Think
Talk:Qamdo Bamda Airport

message: I removed the highest airport in the world, as San Rafael Airport, Peru has an altitude of 4397.
Any suggestions about the purpose of this airport? There are no significant settlements, nor any visible military facilities around. ?? NVO (talk) 00:13, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

message: A quick look in Google Earth shows that although the paved surface is 5500 m, only 4200 m of that is used. The remainder has chevrons painted on its surface, meaning it's not intended to be used (although it clearly was when the runway was constructed). These stopways (contrary to displaced tresholds) should not be included when stating the length of the runway. PiusImpavidus (talk) 09:51, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Runway length
Talk:Saul Fenster

message: I don't see why this should be deleted.  The source is indeed http://www.njit.edu/v2/News/Releases/132.html however this is a press release therefore permission has been given to copy the material. Pridepol 06:31, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Press releases are bad sources and still copyrighted, distribution permitted or not. Luigi30 (Taλk) 14:08, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

text: See Talk:News release which support my claim.  Pridepol 05:14, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright
Talk:John Mitchell (labor leader)

message: I know nothing about the subject so I won't try to fix it, but: When he was nineteen years old, he joined the Knights of Labor in 1885 and was a founding member of the United Mine Workers of America in 1890.
Article says that he was born in 1870 which would make him 15 years old (not 19) in the 1885. --Adam Zivner (talk) 20:48, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chronology problem
Talk:1979 French Grand Prix

message: This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it.  Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed.  I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy.  In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright.  If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed, feel free to ask me on my talk page and I'll review it personally.  Thanks. ---J.S (t|c) 06:46, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube links
Talk:1982 African Cup of Nations

message: This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it.  Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed.  I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy.  In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright.  If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed, feel free to ask me on my talk page and I'll review it personally.  Thanks. ---J.S (t|c) 06:46, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube links 