lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:K9 Thunder

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 11:10, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: :2 K9s malfuntuioned by North Korea first attack.
:합참 관계자는 "북한의 포 사격으로 연평부대가 보유한 K-9 자주포 6문 중 2문이 전자회로장애를 일으켰고 (2010-11-25) Donga Ilbo 
:"By North Korea's first artillery attack, two K9s electronic device damaged"
:So, this thing should change as "two K9s were damaged by the North Korean attack". 660gd4qo (talk) 10:53, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yeonpyeong attack 

message: I am removing most of the material in "Operational History".
It appears to be a deliberate misrepresentation of information reported in the Korean sources to make the K9 appear less effective than it is. The sources read, for example "it was found that 14 of the 45 rounds hit fields and rice paddies, not the artillery sites" and "of the six K9 guns, only three were used"
Previous sources:
http://joongangdaily.joins.com/article/view.asp?aid=2930229
http://koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/nation/2010/11/113_77022.html
http://m.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/nation/2010/12/205_77338.html  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.126.210.50 (talk) 14:17, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Deliberate misrepresentation of sources

message: Why is there such a big weight variation between the two? Licenced versions of an original often have local modifications but are usually minor improvements or the use of equivalent local components to support local companies (eg local engine, localy produced barrel, different electronics etc), but 9 ton is almost 20% heavier. They appear to use the same engine, gun & chassis. Electronics, although potentially a quite significant variation does not weigh much.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.171.145.83 (talk) 11:55, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Entire turret has been modified.Kadrun (talk) 04:26, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

text: Electronics has been simplified to meet Turkish needs.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Noob2013 (talk • contribs) 03:25, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Korean / Turkish Variations 

message: It is claimed in the article that K-9 was able to start at -40 degrees. I don't think that kind of temperatures have ever been recorded in Norway, the Golf Stream keeps the fjords open and extreme cold at bay. 2001:14BA:502C:3400:2D06:AD0E:7C9F:27B9 (talk) 20:01, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: You may be right. I will have to revisit with that one. Kadrun (talk) 07:48, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Norwegian tests
Talk:Tornado outbreak of April 2–3, 1956

message: I moved "Hudsonville-Standale Tornado of April 1956" to this article name IAW Wikipedia:Naming conventions (events). --Rosiestep (talk) 22:58, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: Published research by a National Weather Service employee has separated the "Saugatuck to Trufant" F5 from the NCDC database into the the "Saugatuck to Holland" F4 and the "Hudsonville to Lakeview" F5. The article can be found in the E-Journal of Severe Storms Meteorology, Vol 3, No 1 (2008). link —BazookaJoe (talk) 08:46, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Research separates Hudsonville and Saugatuck tornadoes 

message: damage in picture is from Walker Michigan. Streets shown Maynard, 10th, brownwood, and Nixon. 2600:6C58:7700:17F:B408:DEAA:767F:CA87 (talk) 18:04, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture title wrong
Talk:Romance (novel)

message: According to the title of this article one would expect some sort of a review or synopsis about the novel. Instead we have a report on the partnership between the two authors. I don't know what to do with this article. Rename? Merge to respective authors articles? --Brad101 02:47, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think a synopsis could easily be inserted. Valetude (talk) 15:20, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing article here 

message: Is this actually a romance novel?  I've done a lot of research on the history of the modern romance novel, and this is never mentioned.  I've never read the book, but the reviews I've seen online point to it being more of an adventure novel. Can anyone clear this up?  Karanacs (talk) 16:04, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Genre

message: ...Ford had spiritedly claimed to have taught Conrad English.
:As Conrad had served as an officer in the British Mercantile Marine, passing exams to obtain his Master's Certificate, this seems far-fetched. Valetude (talk) 15:19, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Teaching Conrad English?
Talk:Hispano-French Exposition of 1908

message: The Real Academia defines this ministry as El que tuvo a su cargo promover adelantos y mejoras en la agricultura, la industria, el comercio y las obras públicas. Hasta el año 1900 tuvo también a su cargo la instrucción pública. That covers a lot! I suggested 'Ministry of Development'. Other ideas? Rodney Boyd 23:31, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Ministerio de Fomento

message: I feel "bandstand" is what people are trying to achieve here?
:see --Ecelan 18:21, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Music gazebo
Talk:Rintaro

message: Here are links I've found which I haven't used yet, or which I haven't translated yet:
*http://eiga.com/buzz/20080328/5
I'll add more as I find them. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 06:23, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional links

message: This article desperately needs a critical assessment of Rintaro's work.  Without criticism the article is basically propaganda.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by BeeryUSA (talk • contribs) 15:26, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Criticism lacking

message: The filmography currently lists Rintaro as the director of Reign: The Conqueror, but this is contradicted by the article on that anime in Wikipedia, and the entry at IMDb.
Ewilen (talk) 06:42, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in filmography? 
Talk:Joshua (disambiguation)

message: This link will show article that user either Josh or Joshua... we'd need to organize it by names, and other things (like Joshua tree), etc.  It's not really worth the time, right now... but someday, maybe. gren グレン 23:43, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Occurrences of the name Joshua

message: I'm removing I question the inclusion here of Israeli author A.B. Yehoshua, that now appears on the page Yehoshua (disambiguation), revised from its former function as merely a Redirect to Joshua. I suggest it's unlikely he would be searched by translating his surname to English. -- Deborahjay 16:25, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not Yehoshua?
Talk:Free State (cricket team)

message: Instead of having a separate article, could the information in this article be included in the Eagles cricket team article? QazPlm 23:46, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, not really. The team continued as "Free State" as the state was renamed after 1994 (see  compared with ) - and Free State still plays cricket as a farmer team for the Eagles in the Three Day Challenge tournament. So the team still exists, but should maybe be moved to Free State cricket team? Sam Vimes 08:35, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Alright, I'll remove the merge notice then. As for the name, I thought the "Orange" from Orange Free State was dropped in 1994. The article probably should be renamed. QazPlm 15:22, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Our article on Free State says it happened on 9 June 1995 :) Sam Vimes 16:34, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Allison Crowe

message: Wikipedia has a strict rule about the application of categories to an article: you apply ONLY the NARROWEST subcategory that is applicable. That is, if she's in :Category:Canadian pop singers, then you DO NOT simultaneously file her under :Category:Pop singers, :Category:Singers and :Category:Musicians as well. This is not a negotiable rule, and we are not going to make an exception just for Allison Crowe just because one anonymous user perceives it as "limiting" her, when that exception isn't made for anybody else on Wikipedia. Bearcat 23:48, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a reason to clean up bad existing categorization, not a reason to perpetuate more of it. Bearcat 07:26, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Categorization

message: I don't agree with the classification of this article as a biography.  Allison Crowe's inclusion in Wikipedia is solely because of her role as a musician, and this article is primarily about her music, not her.
As a practical matter, applying "biography" standards here is inappropriate given that she is only 24 years old (at this writing), and only recently has ceased to live with her parents.
If anyone can make a case why this should remain as a biography, please speak up here.  Otherwise I will wait until some time has passed and then remove the biography tagging.
Rohan Jayasekera 17:56, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "Biography" is standard terminology on Wikipedia for any article about a person. The only way this article could be not a "biography" is to not exist at all, and I don't believe that's what you're suggesting. Bearcat 19:25, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Should this really be classified as a "biography"?
Talk:List of My Gym Partner's a Monkey episodes

message: I think The Big Field Trip needs to have its own article. If somebody can rig that up, I'd be obliged. Art1991 03:20, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Trip Article

message: The episode where jake beacomes a guy in comedy? anybody notice?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.208.62.88 (talk) 22:32, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe it's "Yesterday's Funny Monkey"? --Wrzlbrnft (talk) 09:44, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  An episode is missing!! 

message: Excuse me, but the article doesn't exactly read straight. I could find many run-ons, incorrectly capitalized sentances, and unproper punctuation.--Angeljon121 (talk) 02:04, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Noticed you've been suggesting quite a few times on different articles about how others should improve on the articles so I'm figuring WP:SOFIXIT seems to fit the bill. All good telling others there's an issue but much better to actually solve the problems you see. treelo radda 10:08, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammar 

message: Somebody put up a special that aired in 2010. Can somebody please state if the following is true? Rowman (talk) 00:08, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last special
Talk:Star Wars Episode I: Jedi Power Battles

message: Star Wars: Jedi Power Battles is simply a scaled down port of this game, correct? Propose a merge. --TorsodogTalk 17:00, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal
Talk:Elliott, Illinois

message: Amatulic, you delected at least two references to the Oregon Cemetery Desecration, stating that the book referenced was fictional, obscure, and not notable.  This incident was widely covered in local and regional press when it occurred.  The book is extensively referenced, and contains both photographic and documentary sources for the incident.  Two people did a year in jail over the incident, and local press has been covering the release of the book. Here is an example of one article: http://www.paxtonrecord.net/news/arts-and-entertainment/books/2013-05-30/ex-cop-writes-book-about-bizarre-incident-late-1990s.ht It is neither fictional, obscure, nor not notable.  Remember that Dix Township has 600 people, and Paxton has 4,000. Please revert the damage.166.147.104.166 (talk) 22:14, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Oregon Cemetery Desecration Really Happened
Talk:Kempton, Illinois

message: I suggest we ask the City Council to make Opening Day of the MLB Season share a new Kempton Holiday:
Dr. Cub Day - Live From The Sugar Loaf 2601:282:1400:5490:1F3A:FE48:480E:EB02 (talk) 23:46, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jason "Dr. Cub" Colclasure
Talk:Mendeed

message: This is pure tripe stolen from their bio on their official website, which is outdated by the way. That's bad wiki practice. - 00:06, 8 April 2006 195.93.21.36
I'm going to remove the reviews, as they're just opinions of a select few, and most of this article (most, considering it's been ever so slightly editted over time) is just taken off their site at mendeed.co.uk, including the reviews - obviously, they're just there because they are positive reviews. Cool Z 23:50, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: move "From Shadows Came Darkness" and "Positive Metal Attitude" to Albums because their total time more than 30 minutes.
sorry for bad english  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.118.81.29 (talk) 19:38, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: this is not ep
Talk:Brimfield, Illinois

message: "In the village, the population was spread out, with 0% under the age of 18, 0% from 18 to 24, 0% from 25 to 44, 0% from 45 to 64, and 100% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 34 years. For every 100 females, there were 96.4 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 84.2 males." 50.236.12.34 (talk) 19:52, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  This HAS to be wrong
Talk:Tempest 3000

message: Tempest X3 redirects here, but it is not the same game as Tempest 3000. I don't know anything about creating a stub or changing redirects.
Xot (talk) 00:57, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Tempest X3

message: Both remakes actually link themselves to Tempest 2000, not Tempest 3000. Both can utilize the .MOD files (extracted music) of Tempest 2000, Typhoon 2001 even ships 6 of 7 mods. Please link them to T2K, not T3K - as the authors link them to T2k. Yura87 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 17:52, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notes
Talk:Tenchu 2: Birth of the Stealth Assassins

message: umm, tatsumaru has 9 missions not 6.. ill add them now  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.236.156.216 (talk) 07:13, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I merged Burning Dawn into this article. I would have incorporated it into the plot section, but I don't know enough about the game to do this. An editor who is familiar with the game needs to perform the internal merge. Pagrashtak 18:25, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Paxton, Illinois

message: That census data that says Paxton is 7.5% black is a joke.  There are no blacks in Paxton, give me a break.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.229.245.83 (talk) 01:05, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Census Data is a Joke

message: As quoted from policy: Unless restricted by another policy, primary sources that have been reliably published may be used in Wikipedia; but only with care, because it is easy to misuse them.[4] Any interpretation of primary source material requires a reliable secondary source for that interpretation. A primary source may only be used on Wikipedia to make straightforward, descriptive statements of facts that can be verified by any educated person with access to the primary source but without further, specialized knowledge. For example, an article about a novel may cite passages to describe the plot, but any interpretation needs a secondary source.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.248.214.124 (talk) 20:29, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The book is not even remotely important enough to be included in an encyclopedia article, let alone the article's history section. It is utterly irrelevant. However, as a compromise, how would you feel about creating a popular culture section and putting a small entry in there?  Please follow WP:BRD and do not make your edit again until we reach a consensus here. Thank you. Brycehughes (talk) 20:43, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Secondary Sources
Talk:Threads of Fate

message: I removed a significant portion of the plot line because it was much too detailed and too long. It may still be too long with the brief description of Rue and Mint as they are already listed in the Characters section. I know how caught up people can get with articles and writing out the plots. The person(s) who wrote the plot line put a lot of work into it and while I am glad to see so much being done, it was excessive. Plot lines should be concise, spoiler free, and give a brief overview of the story. Further edits on the plot line are probably needed but let it be concise and to the point. Thanks. Jynx980 14:35, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks but they should not be spoiler-free at all; this is an encyclopedia, the ending is supposed to be explained. See also WP:SPOILER for guidelines. Kariteh 14:57, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot Line 

message: Near the bottom of the article it talks about a fan-made sequel to the game, "Duo Princess". 
However at the end of that, it goes onto say that this fan-made sequel to Threads of Fate is
also a 'pseudo sequel' to Brave Fencer Musashi. I'm a little confused, can someone
verify this at all? An outside website (About.com article on Duo Princess) didn't mention anything about it being a sequel to Brave Fencer Musashi (That website's article has added in the references section so go ahead and take a look).
Shinra 11:31, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pseudo Sequel? 

message: It mentions someone named Sugiyama many times in this article, but I cannot find anyone with that name associated with this game. Looking through the Japanese article's, the director's name is "杉本". Which would usually be Sugimoto (or possibly Sugimichi). Unless there is more context on who Sugiyama is, all instances of Sugiyama should be changed to Sugimoto.
70.177.68.249 03:20, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Director's Name
Talk:Traffic Giant

message: From the article:
:Since the map editor has been unofficially released, new maps are still created by active players. The map editor, however, has some difficulties. It was never fully debugged, has done by very dirty code, and has been "unofficially" released. 
--05:51, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Take  a look at this 

message: I was able to cite some sources, but there is still one part of the text that isn't referenced and the infobox doesn't cite anything. Jsayre64 (talk) 15:13, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Referencing
Talk:Tread Marks

message: The official website should be linked , it is part of many infoboxes, has a long tradition and usage in WP and is recommended in WP:EL. I can't think on any reason for hidding this information from the readers as we have now permanent and stable archives of websites available with the Internetarchive. Shaddim (talk) 16:12, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of official website links?
Portal talk:Peru/Peru news

message: I removed the link to the blog article for the time being, and will continue to make sure it doesn't show up. When you (inka wolfy) cite the information from all of your articles (I highly doubt you're an actual first-person news source), I'll give your blog credibility. The topic is an interesting one, but it needs to be credible. Pvt Mahoney 00:13, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fujimori April 2006 article 

message: What is a quake? anyway you were so fast —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 200.106.111.234 (talk • contribs).
:That's how Reuters reported it! :-) --Victor12 02:34, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  August 15th Earthquake
Talk:World in Conflict

message: This is mainly for the warring IP, but what do you hope to achieve out of reorganizing the plot in the way you intend? Other editors can chime in with their thoughts as well. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 21:35, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Its better then the old one, so why do you revert it?86.187.160.51 (talk) 21:38, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

text: Thanks for the efforts. We're at 739 words, but we can let that slide. It's better than the 950+ from earlier. -- ferret (talk) 22:33, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

text: I've blocked the IP for block evasion, but replying for later: Wikipedia has guidelines and policies for a reason. If you want super detailed plots and guidelines, that is better suited for sites like Wikia and Gamepedia. On Wikipedia, the goal is to keep plots concise and to the point, with a general limit of 700 words. This is hardly something being applied only here, and is the case with almost every film and game article. We are constantly working towards this goal. -- ferret (talk) 00:14, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot structure 

message: I'm done with my basic rearrangements and trimming to meet the usual guide lines. Feel free to tweak further or add back any details you feel I cut too deep on. There's still a little bit of gamecrufty-ness, and mostly unsourced, but I think we can find sources for what remains. -- ferret (talk) 16:07, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean up 
Talk:Virtual Pro Wrestling 2: Ōdō Keishō

message: It wasn't really the jap version of WM2000 so much as it was a different game that used the same engine. This is unlike VPW64 which WAS for all intents and purposes an enhanced version of WCW vs nWo. I'm not changing the article right away as someone will probably change it back (I've had arguments about this on other websites) but as someone who owns and has spent thousands of hours on these games, I just can't see how anyone can justify calling them counterparts rather than part of the same series. 76.226.128.147 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment was added at 03:23, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not really a WM2000 counterpart.
Talk:WWF No Mercy (video game)

message: Rumors say No Mercy is returning for the Wii with updated rosters.  that would be awesome  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.249.87.26 (talk) 01:37, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please do not add that to the article, as it is ONLY rumor and speculation. See WP:CRYSTAL. Unless officially confirmed, rumors are NEVER encyclopedic enough for wikipedia. --Romis 16:47, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

text: For the record, here's the link to the 1up.com article: http://www.1up.com/do/newsStory?cId=3164283 Jeff Silvers 15:34, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Addressing the rumors

message: I believe, and I am not alone in this belief, that many of the links on the page that keep getting re-added, such as "The No Mercy Zone" and "MBXFilms" are not encyclopedicly worthy, Please see Wikipedia:External_links#Advertising_and_conflicts_of_interest for more. --Romis 19:00, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Re: The unencyclopedic links

message: This article makes it seem as though only the European release had a flaw which kept the game from saving, but this is not true. Many people in North America, and I'm sure Japan as well, experienced the problem. Gopherbassist (talk) 11:37, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: File deletion
Talk:WWF SmackDown! (video game)

message: --88bbfan (talk) 15:42, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

message: Why not ad the roster it makes the article better in ny oppinion
:See WP:GAMECRUFT and WT:VG. Consensus was to not add roster lists. Also, sign your posts with 4 tildes, and try to spell correctly, please. SimonKSK 21:32, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That's your opinion. SimonKSK 17:13, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roster
Talk:Zombie Revenge

message: In the characters section is this
::Stick Breitling
::A tough, young GameFaqs Board agent, Stick is well rounded in verbal combat against sick, perverted Okatu. 
Someone should correct this. Vicco Lizcano 23:56, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalized? Gamefaqs Board? 

message: On page 86 of Penny Arcade's Book 1, "Attack of the Bacon Robots", Tycho says "While I've got you here, Zombie Revenge is one of the best games Sega ever made.  I think we're in the minority opinion on that, but if there is another game that will let you grind a zombie to nothing with a gigantic industrial drill, I've certainly never heard of it."  Sycomonkey 06:32, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "One of the best games Sega ever made"