lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:SS Deutschland (1900)

message: Both the pages for this one and for  claim this nickname.  Was it really given to both?  Both list conversion to smaller engines to counteract it.  I suspect that this story only applies to one of them, and I believe it was the 1900 version, not the 1923, but I need to check. Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 21:41, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This page should answer your question about the 1900 version.  That was the reason for the ship's conversion to Viktoria Luise, since as a speed champion, there was too much vibration.  SchuminWeb (Talk) 13:03, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The Cocktail Shaker"? 

message: It appears the statistics (length, beam, etc.) in the article and those in the right-hand summary column do not match.  Which are correct?
Yankeecook2 (talk) 15:45, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Statistics Mismatch?
Talk:Principles of the Constitution (1908)

message: For the litteral translation or official translation,when I tried to find the corresponding name,there are more than one translation.Outline of Consitution by Imperial Order or Outline of Imperial Constitution or something else,I cann't tell which is used more frequently,so I chose the Pinyin other than the litteral translation.--Ksyrie(Talkie talkie) 19:03, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Then you must explain this, clearly and completely, in the text of the article or in a footnote. As it stands now it's no good to put "etc." unless that "etc." is explained. Don't keep reverting until you‘ve added the explanation, thanks. Badagnani 19:27, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I mean ,when I firstly wrote this article ,there's no quotation marks,you put these marks and incorporated the etc in the whole translation.So it seems that etc is part of the name,but it's not.--Ksyrie(Talkie talkie) 19:35, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

text: In English, "etc." means that there are more words in the name. This is incorrect. I think what you mean is that there are other translations. If so, please note this in the article so that "etc." is not misinterpreted. It's not hard. Badagnani 19:43, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for correcting my mistake,I really need further study of english semantics.--Ksyrie(Talkie talkie) 23:32, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Litteral translation

message: I renamed and moved the article to the common English name, as, for instance, in Nathan's book. ch (talk) 04:20, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename and move the article
Talk:SS George Washington

message: I'm proposing that three article on the same ship—, , and —be merged into one article. (The latter two are essentially the same DANFS text.) The Catlin name is clearly less notable than the George Washington name. The ship's career before and after World War I under the name SS George Washington was equally notable but considerably longer than her career as USS George Washington, so I am proposing that all three be combined into . — Bellhalla (talk) 04:55, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's always the best thing to do when you have 3 articles basically on the same subject and I would agree with the merge. --Brad (talk) 15:13, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: Does anyone have any objections to not using date autoformatting (i.e., linking dates) for this article? I have taken the liberty of removing the date links, which are no longer required or encouraged under the Manual of Style. — Bellhalla (talk) 03:17, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date autoformatting
Talk:SS Himalaya (1948)

message: I'm having trouble adding a file as a citation I'm new here and finding it a bit over whelming. I have a scan of the receipt given to the stow-away by the captain of the ship. Please HELP  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Triumph Banjo (talk • contribs) 01:47, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trying to at file as citation
Talk:SS Hope

message: How about moving this article to the USS Consolation (AH-15) article, since it was the same ship? --Cobatfor 20:37, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No, separate articles are better, because they cover two separate and very different eras in the history of this ship, and at no time was she both the SS Hope and the USS Consolation.Anythingyouwant (talk) 04:12, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger
Talk:SS Maritime Victory

message: the pvt murphy sailed from New York city, N.Y. around September 1948 to the baffin island. On entering the frobisher Bay harbor, the ship missing an iceberg, hit a reef ripping the bottom keel plates from the second cargo hold to the engine room compartment. the ship last hit came to the engine room shaft alley killing an engine room wiper. His body remained in the shaft alley until the ship returned to the shipyard in Brooklyn, N.Y. on October 4, 1948. The wiper body remained in the shaft alley until the ship was dry dock in Brooklyn, N.Y. I was an Oiler in the shaft alley with this wiper went the incident occurred, but was able to escape through the watertype door into the engine room. My name is Herbert M. Barron I can be reached on the enternet at sixgrands@aol.com
:I removed this passage since it was not cited. I am not saying this did or did not happen, it just needs to be properly sourced before it could be included in the article.-MBK004 18:03, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed Unsourced Editorial 

message: I found reference to this ship []. Efforts should be made to incorporate this information into the article. --Daysleeper47 (talk) 15:12, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: New source
Talk:Valgus deformity

message: I gleaned this from the Varus deformity article and other linked pages - possibly some useful things.
* Latin Dictionary
* Harvard Studies in Classical Philology
* 
* Google books search
* Google scholar search
* Amazon books search
If someone has access to check them out it would be great, or any other possible sources. 
This one looks interesting if anyone has access to it. Google has it listed for $52 right now. 
Halllux Valgus Paper
Title	Hallux Valgus: New Insights for the Healthcare Professional: 2013 Edition: ScholarlyPaper
Contributor	Q. Ashton Acton, PhD
Publisher	ScholarlyEditions, 2013
ISBN	1481659138, 9781481659130
Length	43 pages
Still looking for more. AliveFreeHappy (talk) 22:13, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible reference sources
Talk:Cost of poor quality

message: This should probably be moved to a new article with the name "Cost of Poor Quality" and have COPQ redirect to it. ~ Falls End (T, C) 00:29, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Name 

message: Unless I'm missing the point here, I believe your definition of the above mentioned subject to be incorrect.
As defined:
Cost of Poor Quality, or COPQ, can be defined as costs that would disappear if systems, processes, and products were not perfect.
Should this read  "were perfect"
Ray S A Grant (talk) 13:12, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cost of poor quality 

message: First paragraph--who is Feigenbaum? Another work is cited, but we readers dont know who Feigenbaum is. The book must be introduced first.Hwfr (talk) 15:41, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Feigenbaum
Talk:SS Robert E. Peary

message: I've had a look at this article as part of the DYK review process and have tweaked a couple of minor issues myself. I would suggest that the article be given some structure through the introduction of headings. This is not a DYK requirement and hence I make the suggestion here on the talk page. Schwede66 19:00, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, I've done this now. Prioryman (talk) 08:01, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested improvement
Talk:SS Shieldhall

message: Nothing against the Shieldhall, but this article sounds a bit to much like an advertisement or tourist pamphlet for my comfort..45Colt 05:17, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hmmm.... 

message: I have some pictures I have taken that I’m happy to add to this article, but I’m not entirely familiar with the rules around editing and adding them as I usually only edit text. Can there be more than one picture per article introduction? Chausettes (talk) 19:12, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures
Talk:SS Yarmouth Castle

message: The link to the USCG report for the entry on Yarmouth Castle fire takes one to the current USCG page, which has no listing of the report.
Correct link: http://www.uscg.mil/hq/cg5/docs/boards/yarmouthcastle.pdf
Is listed under the Dept of the Treasury.
Hope this helps. Great entry.
--Badboy64 (talk) 02:21, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to USCG report  

message: Her sister ship SS Yarmouth was actually launched in 1926, not 1927. In 1954 it was sold for service as cruise ship under the Panamanian flag with Eastern Shipping Corporation of  Miami. Yarmouth was renamed Yarmouth Castle. Renamed Queen of Nassau for a contract with the government of the Bahamas. In 1956 Eastern renamed her Yarmouth Castle again. She was again given her original name of Yarmouth in 1961 for some cruises from Boston to Yarmouth. The Yarmouth was laid up 1966. Note: her sister ship SS Evangeline (1927) was named Yarmouth Castle in 1961 and sank in 1965. None of this is explained here... Broichmore (talk) 20:28, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Sister ship the real ''Yarmouth Castle''
Talk:Tripartite-class minehunter

message: The total number of new built ships is 40;
Netherlands 15
Belgium 10
France 10
Pakistan 3
Indonesia 2
So the total number of planned ships is also 40, only the 8 ships Indonesia intended to buy extra are open for discussion.
Latvia and Bulgaria only acquired used ships Jaapzzz (talk) 06:23, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of ships built
Talk:The Oaks Mall

message: The 'History' section is not really a history of the mall, but some odd crime facts that are unverified.   I tried to verify these facts with the local Gainesville Sun website, but could not find them.   I'm going to remove this section for now.   If it should be here, then it should probably be retitled "Unproven/suspected criminal activity".   --74.179.96.109 (talk) 13:59, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  'History' section is a joke
Template talk:Harry Turtledove

message: Good effort on making a collected template of Turtledove's works, but it's just too big IMHO, and it's only going to get bigger. How about focusing only on links to his page and his series, no links to actual books? Arasaka 00:49, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Now it's collapsable, so it's not so big at first glance. 70.51.10.144 06:15, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Too big
Template talk:Newcastle University

message: Template created for Newcastle University - however, a lot of the categories require articles to be written. I shall endeavour to start some but feel free to add them yourselves and change the template as required. It's a fair bit of work to be done.
Xtrememachineuk 00:54, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Template Created

message: I thought that the new template would be a bit easier to use and organise, please say if you think otherwise. Xtrememachineuk (talk) 12:16, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Template Change
Talk:SA Ambulance Service

message: This is an automated message regarding an image used on this page. The image :File:AmbCv2.jpg, found on :South Australian Ambulance Service, has been nominated for deletion because it does not meet Wikipedia image policy. Please see the image description page for more details. If this message was sent in error (that is, the image is not up for deletion, or was left on the wrong talk page), please contact this bot's operator.  STBotI (talk) 02:52, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: An image on this page may be deleted

message: It would be good to add the ramping crisis to the history of this page. SNITZ01 (talk) 02:17, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Its not just SA but a national issue and also it reflects bed shortages in hospitals, should go in some national health system article. Alex Sims (talk) 05:02, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ramping Crisis
Talk:Locomotive Breath

message: This song seems to tell a story, but can anybody tell what the story is? It seems to me a story of a train sabotage and a subsequent crash, from the perspective of a depressed train engineer whose life is in ruins anyway.. Other interpretations? Cryptic Cloud 00:56, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The Story

message: what here is described as recording in an unusual manner is what I thought everybody does and is the normal way of recording??  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jms (talk • contribs) 08:16, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  unusual manner?
Talk:Fusidic acid

message: Fusidic acid has no activity against streptococcus species.  Reference removed. --Gak 00:59, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Streptococcus

message: It looks like a sterol but what is it chemically, and what class of antibiotic is it ? - Rod57 (talk) 11:10, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is it considered a sterol 
Talk:Hentor Sportscasters

message: Regarding the template which currently appears at the top of the page, I don't think the subject of this article meets the requirements for relevance to be included in the main article for Fender Stratocasters, except perhaps as trivia, in which case it would still need to conform to WP:TRIVIA.
In fact, this article itself doesn't, in my opinion, meet the criteria for WP:RELEVANCE & WP:TRIVIA. It's trivia no matter how you slice it. The "definition" in the article is correct: There's no such thing as "Hentor Sportscaster". The name is an in-joke that was reported to fans in one of Rush's biographies. Relevant, it ain't. I unofficially nominate this article for deletion -- only because I don't know yet how to do so officially.
--
ManfrenjenStJohn 01:01, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:William E. DePuy

message: There's a problem in the 3rd paragraph of the "Early life and World War II" section. It has a link to the Battle of the Ardennes, but the link is to a page on WW I.  The Battle of the Ardennes page says the WW II fighting in the Ardennes is covered in the Battle of the Bulge page.  Is that the correct link? Swartik (talk) 19:40, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mistake in WW II description
Talk:Poor Clares

message: There is a street in Brussels called "Rich Clares". Is there any information about them? --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 14:56, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Rich Clares" 

message: I tried the link to The Convent and it didn't work.  I went to the main page and followed the menu to get to The Convent, and put that link in instead.  I just cut-and-pasted, yet it shows up garbled.  I don't know why - it is exactly the same as the link I arrived at through the main page.  --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 15:12, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to The Convent 

message: What are their activities? 
Contemplation in general?
--Error (talk) 22:17, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Activities 

message: What are their rules about property?
It seems important for them but it is not very much explained.
Do they allow exceptions?
--Error (talk) 22:18, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Property 

message: I wish to get a copy of St Claire's of assissi from st Breeze mc Kenna.   I'veost dearglasses and okl ly had them for two days.  There were on the house somewhere. 51.171.104.21 (talk) 23:05, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  St Claire's prayer of assissi
Talk:Stage (stratigraphy)

message: Why the reference in the article to the development of seismology? It's unclear how that assisted the 'dating of rock beds'.Geopersona (talk) 06:20, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Seismology

message: Might the stub article Age (geology) be merged into this article? - they are after all different aspects of the same thing . cheers Geopersona (talk) 06:43, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge suggestion
Talk:List of people from Ithaca, New York

message: Is there a rule-of-thumb on wikipedia for minimum length of residence to qualify on "notable resident's lists?"  I have a nagging feeling that the four years needed to graduate from Cornell or IC are not sufficient to qualify (or else this list would be enourmous, and nearly meaningless).  ??? --Cjs56 01:44, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I feel that you are correct.  4 years spent at a school doesn't a resident make.  Cornell Rockey 21:54, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: How long?

message: Remarkably, this completely unreferenced article survived AfD. Since the AfD decided the topic stays and noted that it should be kept because it could be referenced, I've removed the unreferenced material -- which was the whole list. -- Mikeblas (talk) 14:55, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: reverted WP:POINT should be noted, next time tag with unreferenced. Gnangarra 15:02, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Disrupt? I'm just following Wikipedia policy. Should "fact" tags be added to each of these, then? When should the unsubstantiated material finally be removed? -- Mikeblas (talk) 15:13, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: the afd closed according to consensus, blanking a page isnt a reasonable response under the circumstance. If you think that the consensus was wrong, maybe you should take the closure to WP:DRV. Gnangarra 15:23, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Is it your claim that specific unreferenced material should remain in the encyclopedia just because the topic as a whole passes AfD? -- Mikeblas (talk) 15:32, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It easy enough to source, I just did one. why not do some, it'll encourage other editors to do the same instead of arguing. This is a collaborative effort join in the fun and build its more satisfying than deleting. Gnangarra 16:10, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unreferenced 
Talk:USS Murzim

message: I refer to the sentence (italics added here, only to highlight the phrase at issue):
In light of the Mount Hood tragedy, which involved the complete explosion of another ammunition ship, the USS Mount Hood, it became clear that those on the Murzim and other ammo ships were running the risk of injury at every moment of their stint in the Pacific Theater. 
This was originally
In light of the Mount Hood tragedy, which involved the complete explosion of another ammunition ship, the USS Mount Hood, it became clear that those on the Murzim and other ammo ships were running the risk of instant incineration at every moment of their stint in the Pacific Theater. 
(See the photo of the Mt Hood explosion at USS Mount Hood (AE-11)).
In light of the photo, which looks just like an atomic bomb, which is the best phrase, "risk of injury" or "risk of instant incineration"?  In all due respect to all those who served on the Mt. Hood, on the USS Murzim and other ammo ships in the Pacific Theater, I suggest that this be reverted back to how it was. It did not involve a figure of speech or an exageration.AtomAnt (talk) 14:28, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "risk of injury versus "instant incineration"
Talk:Pappus's centroid theorem

message: does there exist a proof not involving calculus of the first theorem?  I have never seen a proof of this without calculus 70.19.103.56 (talk) 01:46, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably not. At least I didn't hear about the (general) surface area definition or the (general) curve arc length definition which would not involve calculus. Both surface and curve are approximated with the sum of small parts, then we use the limit of the infinite sum of infinitesimal terms (parts areas or lengths, resp.) to get a final value. That is called integration, and is a central concepts of calculus. :) --CiaPan (talk) 16:19, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Proof without calculus

message: I think it's strange, though.--61.23.114.146 (talk) 13:28, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  About long footnotes
Talk:Donald L. McFaul

message: There are a number of sources that say the daughter's name is Megan.USS McFaul 1998 crusiebook,2004 USS McFaul Cruisebook. Recently an IP anon has been trying to add "Dawn" instead of Megan or omitting the name. I have no idea which is actually correct, though Megan seems to be the most heavily cited, but there is no citation for a change to the name Dawn. Due to WP:BLP I don't think we should be naming a person unless we are 100% certain of the correct name. --Dual Freq (talk) 22:09, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Daughter's name 
Talk:Battle of Penghu

message: I will suggest that rename the title as "Naval Battle of Penghu". Because the battlefield was in the sea.--雲角 (talk) 02:34, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The Battle of Trafalgar was a naval battle and yet see what that article is named. Fact is there is no such convention to add "naval" to battle names in English. _dk (talk) 03:33, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  changing name of title 

message: The infobox previously read that the Tungning fleet included battleships and gunships/gunboats. These however did not exist until the 18th-19th century, plus I can't find these in the book where the numbers came from.Desp2002 (talk) 04:22, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Battleships" and "Gunships"?
Talk:Robert George (RAF officer)

message: Although I know it goes against WP convention, I have moved the Australian Robert George to Sir Robert George, rather than have a lengthy and clumsy disambiguator (since there is already another Robert A. George, the shortest I can think of is Robert A. George (Australian governor)). I think the simple "Sir Robert George is preferable.--Yeti Hunter (talk) 16:08, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect to a qualifier
Talk:Luxembourgers

message: Re this revert:
*The Brazilian and Argentinian figures are in no way supported by the source
*Ethnologue gives 40,000 for France, not 60,000. This is for speakers of the language (but not necessarily with Luxembourgian ancestry), while other entries are for people with Luxembourgian ancestry (but not necessarily speaking the language)
*Other figures seem hard to check as well (e.g. US)
Please don't reintroduce these without much better sourcing and corrections. Fram (talk) 14:00, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population figures
Talk:Russell City, California

message: It still exists, according to google maps: http://maps.google.com/?ie=UTF8&ll=37.65148,-122.132263&spn=0.043831,0.09407&t=h&z=14&layer=t  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.113.39.34 (talk) 00:56, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Google Maps displays lots of old place names that were just little stops along the railroad.  It's fun to see those names because they give a little history.  However, often today the names are rarely used or even known.  Up the tracks, for example, is Robert, but everyone knows it as a part of San Lorenzo. Michael Patrick (talk) 20:07, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

message: I believe this may not be a ghost town, unless there are any structures remaining. Drawbridge, California appears to be the only ghost town in alameda county.(mercurywoodrose)76.234.123.226 (talk) 06:31, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I have not been able to find any structures. Mostly industrial parks and salvage businesses. all the buildings in the general area that are old enough to have dated from the time are still in use, as far as i can see, and the land near the 2 parks has no structures. If i find any, I will post pictures.(mercurywoodrose)76.232.10.199 (talk) 02:07, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ghost town?
Talk:Adam of Macedonia

message: I have doubts about the authenticity of this finding. It simply looks too advanced physiololgicaly for its reputed time. Is there any more detailed evidence about how it was discovered? And are there articles that explain how the change in its name occured? Thanks. Politis (talk) 16:17, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Is this a fake?