Template talk:Infobox OS version

message: I finally got around to writing the documentation for this infobox... whew, there's quite a bit of it!  Hopefully it will serve as a useful guide for implementers of this template.   -/- Warren 00:25, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ready for use 

message: I added an optional logo_size parameter for logos that look bad at 250px like this one. It still defaults to 250px, so existing uses should be unaffected. Deco 21:41, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  logo_size 

message: So a change to have the references in the lede changed to use proper  tags instead of superscripted inline extlinks was reverted with a cryptic edit summary which I can only assume was meant to mean something like "I respectfully disagree that this is a productive change". I don't see why there's a reason for these links to be included inline instead of in the refs section - reference styling should be consistent within articles and that includes the infobox. Planning on restoring the use of proper ref tags here. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 11:56, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference styling 

message: The "Os cite needed" is not working, if the release_version does not have a URL, still show "[info]" but with no link--Sotcr (talk) 01:42, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I Mean, like in here , in the Preview_Release says (citation needed), but now that does'nt work --Sotcr (talk) 01:44, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Os Cite needed 

message: I've opened a larger discussion of the styling issue over at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Software#Infobox discussion. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 10:11, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Six weeks later, there has been no opposition. This has been broadcast as widely as it can be put now; as such, in the continuing lack of opposition from anyone but the template author, I'm syncing this with the new sandbox code again. Any issues, please let me know. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 14:25, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yeah, you didn't resolve /my/ issues with the infobox layout.  Until you can produce a version of the  template where the top part goes inside the box, not outside, then I vehemently oppose this change.   Warren -talk- 17:55, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Done. Test cases. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 11:24, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion at [[WP:SOFTWARE]] 

message: It appears that some changes to this template have broken the element that generates the  ...  tags.  This looks to be from the data9 and data10 elements in the template.
For examples, see:
* Windows 7 where the first entry in the references section is "[ info]"
* Mac OS X v10.5 where the first two entries in the references section are: "[ info]" and "[ info]"
--- Barek (talk • contribs) - 18:09, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know why the URLs aren't being formatted properly in the ref tags, but I've changed them to inline links again to fix this. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 09:27, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  ref tag broken 

message: Could we have:
:| header22   = proceeded by
:| data22     =
:| header23   = succeeded by
:| data23     =
Such that one can indicate Apple System 6 was succeeded by System 7 etc.. ?
An alternative might be next/previous.
Alternative:
:| label31    = Predecessor
:| label32    = Successor
Electron9 (talk) 09:37, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I just swung by to ask for the exact same thing (only it's spelled preceded). I would love to just go through OSes and not have to hunt for the earlier OS. But looks like this was requested a year ago with no comment (I don't know if the addition was made to the template and the /doc page not updated). But if anyone's out there, a "preceded by" and "followed by" parameters in the infobox would be wonderful. – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 00:26, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Added. I tested it on my own sandbox, but obviously feel free to fix/revert and be sure to double-check my additions to the /doc page as well. Appreciated. – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 01:00, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  proceeded by/succeeded by