lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Downtown St. Louis

message: On the 'Tallest Buildings' section I removed references to buildings that have not yet been built.
Traveler78 01:53, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Tallest buildings

message: Added a brief mention of the demolition of the Century Building, a notable example of modern day historic preservation failure. Ajacksb 20:09, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Century Building

message: Please go to Wikipedia:WikiProject St. Louis/articles to find out how to improve this page.  DaronDierkes (talk) 01:58, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  To Do List 

message: This page is talking about two different gov designated areas, it should be broken into two articles between this and Downtown West, St. Louis.  I'll do it eventually.  DaronDierkes (talk) 02:15, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  cut in half 
Talk:Astrocaryum aculeatum

message: Govaerts lists this as a valid species, and not a synonym of A. acaule.  Pending a source I am going to remove it.  Guettarda 20:54, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: A. acuale
Talk:1776 English cricket season

message: I can't handle the formatting, or I'd enter it myself, but according to "Arlott on Cricket" (quoting an unnamed source): "On Wednesday June 19th, 1776, on Tichborne Down, Alresford with three of Waltham and two of Warnford v Petersfield and Catherington with the famous Messrs Small, Brett and Barber and H. Bonham Esq." Arlott comments: "Although no result is recorded, these matches, invariably played for wagers, were based on teams of more or less even strength; and to set three such eminent Hambledon players on the other side means that Alresford must have been immensely powerful." JH 20:55, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Formats
Talk:Old North St. Louis

message: Please go to Wikipedia:WikiProject St. Louis/articles to find out how to improve this page.  DaronDierkes (talk) 02:38, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  To Do List 

message: I added an advert tag to this article because it's written from the perspective of the Old North Restoration Society and fails to account for the present state of things in Old North, save for one sentence. The area is currently destitute and looks like a warzone. This article needs to discuss the present and recent past in addition to future hopes and plans. DJLayton4 (talk) 01:58, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality Issues
Talk:Rabbid

message: Bwahahahaha! These rabbids crack me up! Das654 20:58, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think it kinda disrupts the page - split? // Gargaj 11:24, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bunny types 

message: Subj. What next?
--Nosferatu5 04:17, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The page "list of Rabbids" is finished. I mean, as in "I have done most of the text". 

message: I noticed a merge request at The Raving Rabbids that has existed for a while. I would support such a merge proposal, as the other article is a stub with no references. Randomran (talk) 03:30, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge in the raving rabbids
Talk:Techno-utopia

message: According to a Wikipedia rule of thumb: 1) if something is in See also, try to incorporate it into main body 2) if something is in main body, it should not be in See also and therefore 3) good articles have no See also sections. --Loremaster 21:02, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Are these rules of thumb written down on any wikipedia policy pages? Googling this exact text didn't turn them up anywhere, except for User_talk:Piotrus/Archive_11#About_See_also where you asked the user "Piotrus" where he had heard this rule of thumb--did he ever answer you, and if not, what's your basis for thinking this is indeed a widely-accepted rule of thumb? Hypnosifl 01:22, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Conversations I had with Wikipedia administrators. Like I said, its a rule of thumb not an official policy. --Loremaster 15:32, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: About See also

message: I've deleted the mention of the Technocratic movement until we can cite as source that describes them as techno-utopian. That shouldn't be too hard for those interested in restoring the mention to find. --Loremaster 00:12, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Technocratic movement
Talk:LaSalle Park

message: Please go to Wikipedia:WikiProject St. Louis/articles to find out how to improve this page.  DaronDierkes (talk) 02:28, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  To Do List 
Talk:1775 English cricket season

message: refers to a match in 1775: "The earliest initial record found is of a fixture between New Alresford and Bishops Waltham at Stephens Castle Green held on the 28th August, 1775. According to the Hampshire Observer, New Alresford beat Bishop's Waltham with two given men by nine wickets." JH 21:10, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: One may have no doubt that the information in this article, and others like it, is accurate and can be sourced to the references started but it is essentially a statistical summary. Surely the article should present the reader with a narrative description of the season? One would hope for revision at some point. Though presumably compliant when written several years ago it now seems anachronistic, which is a shame. --Jim Hardie (talk) 19:38, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Narrative
Talk:Fluoropolymer

message: 3M is a major player in fluoropolymers - any article should include them as well as other manufacturer apart from DuPont and Solvay--Oldboltonian (talk) 07:44, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  3M 

message: The article states that "Fluoropolymers were accidentally discovered in 1938 by Dr. Roy J. Plunkett when he was polymerizing tetrafluoroethylene to form polytetrafluoroethylene". That makes it sound like he was purposely polymerizing TFE and accidentally ended up with PTFE... which of course is absurd. My guess is that he accidentally polymerized TFE when he was trying to do something else, but I'm not going to edit without any good reason to believe it... Anyone know better than me? • TheBendster (talk) 1 May 2010, 16:56 (UTC)
:He had a stuck cannister of TFE (doesn't matter why he had the substance).  Polymerization was discovered when he cut the cannister open.  Polymerization just happened.  TFE -> PTFE + F2 (maybe the F2 reacted with cylinder walls, not sure, doesn't matter).TCO (talk) 19:47, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Why would F2 be produced? H2 isn't produced in ethylene polymerisation. nC2F4 → (CF2)2n. --Ben (talk) 20:37, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: You're quite right, my bad.  C2F4 -> -(CF2)-  TCO (talk) 22:06, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Any explanation?
Talk:Cyberchondria

message: I'm extremely dubious about mention of Harris in the lede.  The first thing that went through my head was "this is Sut Jhally writ large".  How does the market Harris serves wish this term to function?  Probably they want patients showing up at their doctor's office requesting exotic medications for conditions of borderline concern.  Does it help them if the negative, neutral, or confused interpretation prevails?  It's a non-trivial task to determine what is being spun and to whom.  MaxEnt (talk) 15:21, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mention of Harris in the lead 

message: I think I have this. That explains everything! --122.105.225.197 (talk) 02:48, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oh my God! 

message: The term is unclear in the definition. Thank you. -- Abhijeet Safai (talk) 06:57, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  The term is unclear 
Talk:Sachs Motorcycles

message: The article was ambiguous about the current status of the company.  I did some minor revision to reflect this; I agree that it's inaccurate to use the past tense in reference to the company, though of course that can change. Citroënist 13:08, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current status of Sachs 

message: Is there any reason not to combine the separate articles of Sachs Motorcycles and ZF_Sachs? They seem to overlap in information at the moment. LasseS 10:32, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Most of the history contained in the ZF Sachs article rightly belongs in the Sachs Motorcycles article.  ZF Sachs' history really only begins in 2001, and ZF Sachs shouldn't be part of WikiProject Motorcycling, but Sachs Motorcycles should. Dbratland (talk) 03:41, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Where should information regarding the newer Chinese-made motorcycles created under the label of Sachs be located? -Martin_henry Martin henry (talk) 00:56, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Combining of articles 

message: The current version reads: «Sachs Motorcycles is a German based motorcycle manufacturer, founded in 1886 [...] having manufactured their first motorcycle in 1904». Some explanation of what was the company about before 1904 would be appreciated. Thanks - Nabla (talk) 19:43, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  1886-1904 time gap 

message: Royal Enfield brand was created in 1892. They built first motorized vehicle which was a quadricylcle in 1898, tricycle in 1899 and finally motorcycle in 1901. Hence it is oldest motorcycle manufacturer in continuous production.This is already mentioned in wikipedia article on Royal Enfield. Thus it should also be mentioned here Rajesh Kumar69 (talk) 15:09, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oldest motorcycle maker
Talk:Anatoly Trofimov

message: WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 13:20, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment

message: I understand that Anatoly Trofimov was an immediate superviser of Litvinenko in FSB. Is that correct?Biophys 21:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: As I explained in edit summary, this opinion is sourced, but it is completely irrelevant. If he told about himself that he was an intelligence officer, but he was not, that opinion would be fine. But he did not claim that. And this article make it very clear that he prosecuted Soviet dissidents and did not work for foreign intelligence.Biophys (talk) 14:16, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The information isn't quite irrelevant, as the article includes information from another source (i.e. Livtinenko) that Trofimov knew such and such. The sourced and attributed opinion states that although Litvinenko made the claim, that how Trofimov would have known about it is beyond the realms of logic. This is all that this is, and it is valid for inclusion in the article, and other articles as well. --Russavia Dialogue 14:38, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

text: Additionally, if you disagree with this, you should be seeking a third opinion from a noticeboard, as the burden is on the "editor who wishes to remove content from an article should first check to ensure that its inclusion has not already been discussed. While consensus can change, repeatedly going round the same loop of argument is considered disruptive and is not conducive to harmonious editing.  Where disputed content is removed, it is reasonable to expect that a justification be given for its removal, and the editor seeking to remove the content engages with those who seek to include it.  The aim is always to work with others to build an encyclopaedia, not to draw battle lines." --Russavia Dialogue 14:40, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I did not exclude any important information. An opinion piece you cited provides only one bit of factual information: that Trofimov did not work aboroad, and I cited it for sourcing precisely this in the last version you reverted.Biophys (talk) 15:37, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I am sorry, but the whole second paragraph in "Prodi" section (disputing the claim by Trofimov) does not make any sense. The Mitrokhin Commission started in October 1999. Trofimov told Litvinenko about "our man in Italy" in 2000. Thus, Trofimov was telling something that everyone already knew, something that was published in all newspapers.Biophys (talk) 00:03, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Last edits
Talk:The Cure: Trilogy

message: (at the beginning)
How can the fans have been asking for years for this concert, when the concert actually took place a bit more than three years after the release of Bloodflowers? ChKa 21:31, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fans asking? 

message: seventeen seconds was supposed to be the third part of the trilogy not bloodflowers. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Curefreak (talk • contribs) 20:55, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seventeen Seconds 

message: I've read there are several hidden extras on these DVDs, but I've not been able to find any of them. Anyone else out there know about these, and if so can you post info about them here or on the actually wiki entry? S_m_rinequistSineBot (talk) 20:26, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hidden "Eggs"
Talk:Athena Weston School District

message: This article was tagged as non-notable, but I suspect that it is notable. (how many high schools have pipe bands? Are they common?) Since the article is entirely unsourced, however, it's hard to tell just how notable this band is. I found one minor reference from the Albany Democrat-Herald, but it needs more. Has the band ever been written up in a statewide or national (or international) publication? Surely someone in Athena has press clippings... Katr67 14:54, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The above discussion does not preclude the continued presence of the  tag. This article should be merged to the high school article when one is created. Katr67 (talk) 23:59, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

text: Yep, you're right. Tag removed. • Freechild'sup? 20:36, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: References needed for former Pipe Band article

message: The above message refers to the the Weston McEwen Pipe Band article, which I merged to a new school district/high school article. The combined school district, high school and pipe band article should make the subject notable enough. I believe school districts are considered inherently notable, and high schools usually are, and if deemed not notable, they are merged with their school district article. See: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Common outcomes#Education. It is unlikely matters will be improved by merging this article with Athena, Oregon or Umatilla County, Oregon, which are the only solutions I can come up with. I realize the article is still a mess and that it needs more refs. See also: List of school districts in Oregon. Katr67 (talk) 20:25, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, you're right. Tag removed. • Freechild'sup? 20:36, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: State of article since merger
Talk:Kalhora dynasty

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement.  In this case, it can be verified that some of the content in this article duplicated that at . Other text added by this contributor may have been taken from other non-free sources.
Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:07, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 

message: Hello. I have merged Kalhora Dynsaty into Kalhora in order to improve both topics. I am happy to discuss. Regards to all, Myrtle G. Myrtlegroggins (talk) 05:49, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: @Myrtlegroggins Looks like someone split it again. You were right, they were wrong. It's ridiculous. - Sitush (talk) 14:16, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merged into Kalhora 
Talk:Debal

message: Debal is a professional photographer, and also lectures to a range of groups from professional photographers through to students of architecture/building studies/quantity surveying as well as adult learners and running childrens' holiday courses.
Born in Accra, Ghana, West Africa in September 1964 to an Indian father Diptish Narayan Bagchi an aeronautical engineer from Jamsherpur, Nadia District in West Bengal and Edith Kraus a nurse from Südetenland via Germany.
He spent the first 6 years of his life in Ghana before coming to England, where he lived in Osterley, West London, and then left in October 1974 to Malaysia.
Boarding school in Mayfield, East Sussex ensued, and then he read Physics with Medical Applications in King's College, University of London.
Work as a data analyst for Western Geophysical Co. of America brought him much numerical experience, which he later utilized as a Diamond Analyst, being part of the team which broke the DeBeers' Diamond Cartel on behalf of the Australian Mine Argyle Diamonds.
He currently lives between London and Antigua.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Debal07 (talk • contribs) 20:10, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Debal Bagchi 

message: It is unclear from this article and the article on Debal what the relation of the two cities might be. 
It is clear that there is mention of a city named Debal in historical records. Is the name Banbhore also found in historical records? Or is this a more modern place name used to describe the discovery of the ruins of a medieval port? Ahassan05 (talk) 06:51, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Debal and Banbhore
Talk:Nasir ad-Din Qabacha

message: Note:  Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 15:47, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Delhi Addition 
Talk:Alyssa Barlow

message: This section lacks any sort of sources at all. Wikipedia aims to be free of independent research; a section should only be added it you can back it up with something. Even if you find a source, it should still be changed to "Alyssa claims" or "Alyssa feels" that it was God who healed her, which cannot be definitively proven.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.160.222.32 (talk) 18:56, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Testimony"
Talk:Becca Barlow

message: I think the individual articles on the Barlow sisters could use some expansion.  I'm planning on adding a few tidbits of information here and there, but, for Becca, there's the whole story of her eating disorder documented in the book "BarlowGirl: More Than Music".  Would it be okay to quote parts from the book, making sure to accurately cite it? WordyGirl90 12:53, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, as long as it not slanderous/libel. Please cite quotes inline. An easy way to do this is to use the  template. Royalbroil 12:59, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

text: You did a great job. Quotes can only be used if they are cited like you did on the first quote. I fixed the citation. Please cite the second quote, or reply here and I can do it. I don't like the sentence: "She cites painting, cutting hair, cooking, and fixing automobiles as her hobbies." because it sounds like something that belongs on MySpace, not in an encyclopedia. I'll leave it alone since you cited it, but don't be surprised if someone removes it. Royalbroil 03:21, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  In need of expansion
Talk:Lauren Barlow

message: She does far more lead vocals than what this article alludes to.  In fact, in the How Can We Be Silent bonus DVD, Alyssa makes the statement that Lauren sings about half of their songs. WordyGirl90 13:14, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please add an appropriate quote to this article then and cite it. I would, but I have the CD and not the DVD. Royalbroil 13:28, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Lead Vocals
Talk:Al-Taliya Club

message: I need a clarification regarding the club's history. The club is said to be established in 1962, but in the profile in the OFA site it is said that is was established in 1972. Also, in the article in Arab Wikipedia it is said that the club was established in Kuwait. Can someone clarify these two points?--Daffidovic (talk) 08:18, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Establishment date 

message: ا 37.41.110.185 (talk) 08:06, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  نادي خرا لا تاريخ ولا حاضر
Talk:Sabrina the Teenage Witch (film)

message: It should be noted that the entire second paragraph of this article has been lifted wholesale from the back of the DVD package.  This needs a rewrite at the very least. --Martinship 22:03, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Here says "Harvey is "nerdy" in the film whereas in the TV series, he is more of a "jock". Sabrina and Jenny are nerdy in the TV series, whereas in the film, they are jocks"
Jock is only used for man, not woman, they cannot be jocks, didnt correct becuase i dont know the femenine word  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.143.208.29 (talk) 03:07, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jock
Talk:Mucca Pazza

message: Just created the page.
Notability is based in their performance at Lollapalooza this year, as well as the fact that they are becoming fairly well known in the Midwest.  I can explain more apon request.  However, please do not delete until I get the chance to explain.  I understand the issues of notability with musical groups, and Mucca Pazza can pass them.minidoxigirli-talk--contribs 22:04, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Ed Nimmervoll

message: I've beefed up this article: provided an infobox, a biblio sectn and supplied some refs: more needs to be done but it is now at Start Class.Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 11:14, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Major edit
Talk:Hutcliffe Wood

message: The book 'Abbeydale and Millhouses - the second selection' by Peter Harvey published in 2001 uses the name Hutcliffe with the E ommitted. There was a discussion concerning the naming and all available sources, all online, referred to the woods as Hutcliff. since this source is entirely verifiable, is there posibility of moving the article to Hutcliffe Wood ? This spelling can be verified p43 amongst others. Captain Scarlet and the Mysterons 22:11, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Did you mean to say "...name Hutcliffe with the E present"? --VinceBowdren 10:06, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No i didn't. Captain Scarlet and the Mysterons 10:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Hutcliff v Hutcliffe
Talk:COSIC

message: The article COSIC was created by a member of the research group COSIC on the 25th of November 2006. The information in the article is copied from an introduction on the official home page of the group: http://www.esat.kuleuven.be/cosic/.
--Ksimoens 22:48, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled