lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Architecture of the California missions

message: Members of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles are in the process of doing a re-review of current Good Article listings to ensure compliance with the standards of the Good Article Criteria. (Discussion of the changes and re-review can be found here). A significant change to the GA criteria is the mandatory use of some sort of in-line citation (In accordance to WP:CITE) to be used in order for an article to pass the verification and reference criteria. Currently this article does not include in-line citations. It is recommended that the article's editors take a look at the inclusion of in-line citations as well as how the article stacks up against the rest of the Good Article criteria. GA reviewers will give you at least a week's time from the date of this notice to work on the in-line citations before doing a full re-review and deciding if the article still merits being considered a Good Article or would need to be de-listed. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact us on the Good Article project talk page or you may contact me personally. On behalf of the Good Articles Project, I want to thank you for all the time and effort that you have put into working on this article and improving the overall quality of the Wikipedia project. --- The Bethling(Talk) 22:46, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've linked to the original id of the article when it was made GA, but not to any id after the in-line citations were added. In my opinion, this article now passes the inline citation criteria. Carcharoth 22:39, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA Re-Review and In-line citations 

message: While no two missions are "identical", they are "alike" in that they use the same building materials and similar architectural style.  I have fixed this in the lead. --Pseudo-Richard (talk) 23:27, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "alike" vs. "identical" 

message: According to Miriam-Webster, "priest's quarters" and convento are synonymous: .  These are listed separately in the 'Site selection and layout' section; I don't know how or if this should be corrected. 107.15.157.44 (talk) 19:37, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Convento''
Talk:A Scientific Support for Darwinism

message: Exactly what is the point of this encyclopedia article? I'm considering WP:AfD -- Ec5618 19:30, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It documents a historical occurance of note.  What's the point of any encyclopaedia article? WilyD 13:15, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Gregory S. Paul

message: I've changed the last part of the Writing section, to make it clear that Paul's paper did not suggest what the previous edit said it did. I quoted the paper itself to prove this point. For an extended discussion of the study, I wrote an article in the recent Skeptic's Magazine about the study, entitled Religious Belief and Societal Health.
:I modified this further. If the previous edit was in error, it's point does not deserve to be addressed at all.Dinoguy2 01:44, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I split out the section, rewrote it, and replaced the inline links with notes and end refs. I didn't add any new content, but I did add two  tags because criticism should be sourced (Jensen's paper doesn't qualify; the only publication of Paul's that he references is Beyond Humanity 1996, not the paper being discussed). | Pat 04:56, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Religion

message: So October 1st, a certain Artisticmerit deleted the mention of Jensen calling some of Paul's statistics into question, while accounts of Paul's researches and opinions have ballooned in the "Religion" section.  Then there are lines like, "In a discussion in Science covering the growing body of mainstream research demonstrating that religion is dependent on dysfunctional socioeconomic conditions, Paul observes..." etc.  I haven't read the article, so I wouldn't know, but I'm pretty sure there are many who would take issue with that matter-of-fact tone, among them many many materialists of Scott Atran and Michael Persinger's ilk.  So maybe that could be rephrased?  I would like to see some mention of Jensen back in hear, but since I'm not up for an editing war or even an editing skirmish, I won't hold my breath.  Corbmobile (talk) 17:12, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Jensen

message: I was wondering where he were born? I wish someone with this knowledge would add it to the first paragraph.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.33.155.1 (talk) 13:14, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Paul himself states that he was born in the north of Virginia but doesn't indicate a particular location.--MWAK (talk) 19:37, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  I know Paul personally and can certainly get this information, but I wonder if there is a simple way for this not to violate wikipedia original research or other policy. Papna (talk) 22:40, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Home town, state, country 

message: He is most widely known as Gregory S. Paul, not just Gregory Paul. I moved this to Gregory S, Paul by mistake, could someone move it to its proper place? FunkMonk (talk) 19:09, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gregory S. Paul 

message: There is an RfC on the question of using "Religion: None" vs. "Religion: None (atheist)" in the infobox on this and other similar pages. 
The RfC is at Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion. 
Please help us determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 17:19, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion|Request for Comments]]
Talk:Common recovery

message: I hope I have correctly described this.  I have written this from my experience of examining historic legal documents, rather than based on any text book.  If some one with access to one likes to correct me, I will only be too happy - provided the text book is in fact correct.  Since Recoveries were abolished so long ago, this probably means a mid-Victorian text book, from a period when common recoveries still appeared as part of land titles that lawyers were actually examining for technical correctness.  Peterkingiron 19:41, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Old comment

message: I do not see how this can be simplified.  It is a complicated, obscure, and obsolete subject.  You cannot expect it to be put in plainer English, but that is not feasible.  I am not sure that contemporary lawyers really understood it; they just did it.  Peterkingiron (talk) 15:59, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I have made some edits that I hope will make it easier to read, if not understand.  Understanding the concept of legal fictions is essential prior to understanding common recovery.  Also understanding how hidebound British procedure at law or in chancery had become by 1500, helps in understanding the development of legal fictions. --Bejnar (talk) 05:17, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Simplify tag
Talk:Drug of last resort

message: The article about Ciprofloxacin says that there are strains resistant to it, but this article says there are none? --85.130.6.178 (talk) 19:42, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ciprofloxacin resistance? 

message: I think this drug is appropriate here, but I don't know what kind of citation would be valid for such a subjective topic... But clozapine has all of the characteristics mentioned in the introduction to this article: better efficacy, additional side effects (seizures, agranulocytosis), and is considered an option only after multiple treatment failures in most algorithms. --128.248.141.106 (talk) 22:26, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clozapine 

message: This is laughable. About half of the patients in any given ICU are on this drug, and it is pretty well tolerated. --128.248.141.106 (talk) 22:26, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Most restriction schemes for the use of vancomycin are because unrestricted use of it would increase the number of patients in which resistance plasmid transfer (thus resistance to what's almost an indispensable drug in the ICU setting) occurs.  It's being "saved" for those patients for whom there are few other treatment alternatives (infection with MRSA, for example). And that's not laughable. loupgarous (talk) 06:16, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vancomycin 

message: I haven't seen this term—initialized or otherwise—used often in medical literature. As a result, defining it and providing examples of "drugs of last resort" will be tricky. Perhaps it would be better to describe drugs used in higher lines of therapy/treatment (LOT)? Sometimes the terms "last-line drug/therapy/treatment" and "last line of therapy" appear in literature, but are seldom used because of their implications.
"Lines of therapy" is a far more recognized term that applies to essentially all therapies and diseases that have regimented treatments—drug resistance, MDR, cross-tolerance, treatment-resistant conditions, experimental therapies/drugs, and so on. Using this term instead of "last resort" also clears up ambiguities regarding the qualifications for a drug to be considered of last resort. This is because LOTs are defined. – Vonkworm (talk) 08:16, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "DoLR" not used in literature
Talk:Master of Requests (France)

message: "the term "maître" is an honorific title for lawyers);" Is that the origin of the word? What about, for instance, the English master of the Rolls, or the conseiller-maître at the Cour des comptes ? 129.102.254.253 19:47, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maître 

message: The commonplace, everyday meaning of the word « requêtes » is "requests", but that is not the correct translation of this word in jurisprudence or administration, where the proper translation is "petitions" or "appeals". For example, in law, « une requête civile » means: "an appeal to a court (against a judgement)."  As an occupational position, « Maître des requêtes » is someone whose actions fulfill the role of "counsel" or "administrator". My Le Robert-Collins Senior (= "Unabridged") Dictionnaire, français-anglais, Sixth Edition (Paris : Dictionnaires Le Robert-VEUF), translates the occupational title « Maître des requêtes » into English as "Counsel to the Council of the State". This is perhaps clumsy, but is much better than the too literal, uninformed, and might I add incorrect "Master of Requests". (NB: Myself, I usually write "Counsel to the State" when I make historical translations.) I am going to add the definition from Le Robert into the article with the Ref. --- I am pondering moving this article to a more correct English title after some more research. Comments? Charvex (talk) 06:46, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requêtes
Talk:Beggars Bush, Dublin

message: I added a few links and a category. Hopefully I will be soon able to expand on the history and addd more links to this entry. Autarch 19:50, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hopefully I will also catch my typos (i.e. "addd")!!! Autarch 19:21, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of Frontier Brains

message: I think we should clean up this article, what do you think  Minun  (talk) 19:51, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: The page Anabel redirected to the article to which this talk page is attached. Feel free to add an item that links here, if it's apropriate (I wouldn't know one way or the other, and simply have aquired a taste for etymology).  — AnnaKucsma   (Talk to me!) 18:29, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Replaced a page that redirected here

message: How does "Tucker" sound like "Tactics"? ~Crowstar~crow calls 23:39, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: erm....it starts with a "T"?—Ｌｏｖｅはドコ？ (talk • contribs) 23:44, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tucker 

message: So how are we going to write about this in this article?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Blueknightex (talk • contribs) 11:27, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Battle Frontier in Pokemon Platinum 

message: to merge a summary to list of Pokémon characters.
I think it would be appropriate to merge this list into List of Pokémon characters. Most of the relevant information is already listed at List of Pokémon characters#Battle Frontier Frontier Brains. Also, there are a lack of reliable third-party sources for this article suggesting that it could be removed for failing WP:V (let alone WP:N). It also fails WP:PLOT and WP:UNDUE for going into exhaustive detail about every last appearance in games/anime/manga, beyond what is necessary for a WP:CONCISEPLOT. All in all, this list does not really meet our policies, but the information could be salvaged at the larger character list. Randomran (talk) 06:42, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. The lack of sources and amount of detail are not good signs. Merging the content sounds like the best solution at this time. (Guyinblack25 talk 17:20, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

text: Support merge. For the most part, no reliable sources exist to allow this article to exert notability. Artichoker[talk] 20:40, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

text: Support cutting down and merging. Irredeemable mess as not enough sources exist to maintain this level of detail. bridies (talk) 02:36, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  proposing a merge
Talk:Topogravitic tensor

message: I created the original version of this article and had been monitoring it, but I am leaving the WP and am now abandoning this article to its fate.
Just wanted to provide notice that I am only responsible (in part) for the last version I edited; see User:Hillman/Archive.  I emphatically do not vouch for anything you might see in more recent versions, although I hope for the best.
Good luck in your search for information, regardless!---CH 19:53, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Students beware
Talk:Optimus Primal

message: This is apparently a big item of discussion, so how about instead of editing and re-editing the page, we talk it over?  I know that I personally have never referred to the Bat Optimus Primal as Onyx Primal.  If anything I refer to it as Optimus Prime because the original 2 pack was intended to be the original TFs' leaders.--TriPredRavage 14:13, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Onyx Primal/Bat Optimus Primal

message: Someone should get an image of the original Optimus along with all the other characters.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.149.50.195 (talk) 00:02, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: New Image!
Talk:The Scott Adams Argument

message: The article is not exactly correct anyway. Adams does not just argue that humankind would be frantically trying to find the right God-- he argues that if people believed in the God they claim to believe in they would act like it by not constantly sinning, helping the poor, etc. //// Pacific PanDeist * 22:41, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Completely concurred.  This article, due to its incorrectness and breach of NPOV policy, ought to be totally scrapped and rewritten, as the entire thing is obsolete.  -AlexFolland 12:07, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

message: Maybe this article should be merged with the one on Scott Adams. -- Das Baz 19:54, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess you might be on the right path to some certain extent. However, about the Wiki-article on Scott Adams, which is an article type under the Living People Category, is only more on about himself. On what I do agree with you is that this article should be merged --- into another article called "God's Debris", which is his book that contains this sort of argument, rather than to place it onto his biography Scott Adams. The reason behind this merging stuff is that Scott Adams' book, "God's Debris" contains this theme or aspect and part about its content edited here was taken from such book. Besides and normally, the separation or splitting of articles only happen when the main article like if God's Debris is really way too long or too crowded to be edited in or filled in. Thus, at this time around since that matter on lengthy articles has never occur to me yet (that is as far as the article of God’s Debris is concern) plus although it is not mentioned in that God's Debris article over there, I feel that it's quite redundant and unnecessary to have another minor article that states virtually about the same thing as the other and I think that this article ought to be or should be merged right away! --onWheeZierPLot 10:21, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, this should absolutely be in God's Debris!! //// Pacific PanDeist * 02:15, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree... It is more appropriate to have two different pages for the Concept and the piece of Text.--AFACI 03:37, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Scott Adams has many ideas and philosophical arguments, and receives hundreds of comments per day on his blog. I see no reason why this particular idea of his should merit its own Wikipedia article. In addition the entire article is POV, as it is a two-sentence summary of the idea followed by a lengthy unsourced and biased editorial. I'm going to make it a redirect to God's Debris. --PeR 17:15, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge page
Talk:Demofonte

message: The list is impressive, but someone should also indicate WHICH of these operas were successful, remained famous, influential, etc. As such, one has no idea whatsoever which operas were complete failures and which had an afterlife and even which might be interesting to today's listeners. Please add this information, for example in the introduction to the article (e.g. "... among them, the most important ones being the settings by X, Y, and Z."). 85.0.214.15 (talk) 02:12, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Kapino Polje Airport

message: What is a "sport airport"? An airport solely for recreational planes? Can this be explained, please? Thanks. -Fsotrain09 20:06, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Cordes-sur-Ciel

message: Working on it.  Might have to find a box that's for english towns. --Zagsa 20:07, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Okay, more or less updated into english, fixed images, links, etc.  There was a population box that was out of date and kind of useless, (imho looking at the data), but if anyone wants to add it back in here's a code you can copy from edit. --Zagsa 21:24, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation
Talk:Blackarachnia

message: Problem is you can't have multiple affiliations in the template, as it makes the name white. Can this be solved? Until then do we go with the first? Last? Most used? user:mathewignash
Ah. I didn't realize that. I get what you're saying about Decepticon - chronologicaly she was one at the latest point in her existance that we know of (Universe). I just think that, as she was a Predacon who turned to the Maximal side in the better known animated series, we should record that info. Regards.SMegatron 11:44, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Affiliation

message: I worked on the page off site for  while, adding more references, and checking the formatting and double checking the citations. Mathewignash (talk) 22:14, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Page recreated
Talk:Ik heb zorgen

message: I don't see why "And that bothers me a lot" doesn't make sense? It bothers him that he has so many worries. "It bores me" is a literal translation which doesn't make sense, so that's incorrect.
:It doesn't make great sense in English, which is the point I was making in the article. BigHaz 01:37, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Kinghorn Methodist Episcopal Cemetery

message: Ok. so whats wrong with this.  Its an old area in the region. Ive seen articles started with  much less information then this. Hubert Derus 20:28, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I stated the reasoning in the prod notice. Essentially, just because something is old doesn't make it encyclopedic; it has nothing to do with the article's length. You've removed the prod, and I've left it at that. If you're upset that I prodded the article, so be it, but be aware that the fact that I think the article is unencyclopedic does not mean I think your contributions are worthless. Far from it... Mindmatrix 13:51, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mark Tilden

message: "He is a controversial robotics physicist" - can someone elaborate on this?  I'm dying to know how one stirs up controversy in the field of robotics.
:I deleted it.--130.85.194.15 22:12, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The controversy arises from the fact that his robots are controlled via feedback loops rather than traditional programming, and at least in the early days of BEAM, luminaries like Marvin Minsky refused to believe his robots were anything other than a radio-controlled hoax because they did amazing things with a tiny amount of circuitry.  Also, his philosophy (at least pre-WowWee) has been that he should aid the robots' evolution as if it were a biological process, as opposed to designing things outright.  His robots are essentially constructed living things, not computers with attachments. 216.254.25.199 09:33, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Shouldn't this be listed on the "Tilden" disambiguation list? (Not sure how to put it there myself...)
193.217.200.209 01:15, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation 
Talk:Super Mario Advance

message: I agree about the voices. It's just not the same. Pluss, Mario's high-pitched bad Italian accent is annoying. So annoying in fact that I often use anyone but him. Luigi's is less high pitched, so I use him instead.
:Wikipedia is not a discussion forum.172.189.195.66 13:17, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I found the answer to my own question. Both versions do indeed have the same voices. --64.149.39.28 06:36, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Voices

message: Does anyone know who scored SMA? I could swear that Daft Punk had something to do with it. 69.125.89.103 00:09, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Musical credits 

message: I just checked the edit log after restoring the article, and I still believe that the article should be preserved. Yes, these are ports of NES and SNES games, but all four games are in the top 10 best-selling Game Boy Advance video games. Combined, they sold over 19.5 million copies. It would be important to point out the differences between the originals and the remakes. Like Super Mario All-Stars, these games are not merely ROMs thrown in an emulator, but they enhance the games (to a lesser extent with SNES titles). I would like to hear your thoughts. --LABcrabs (talk) 03:16, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: If the information is to be restored, could you at least use the versions that have an infobox, and meet WP:VG/MOS? Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 10:55, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article restored
Talk:Super Mario World: Super Mario Advance 2

message: It seems this page used to be a lot longer, and now entire sections are completely gone. What happened?.DJKingpin 07:06, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: What?

message: Koopa Troopa, Bullet Bill, and Piranha Plant also change after completing all levels, don't they? --82.207.190.217 12:25, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changing enemies 

message: "*The game's power up system was changed (i.e. Fire Mario/Cape Mario reverts back to Super Mario if hit, unlike the SNES version, where Mario reverted back to Small Mario regardless of the power up)"
As I recall, this was not the case in the SNES version of Super Mario World.  The only game that did this was Super Mario Bros, on NES.  I removed this from the list of differences on the main page.  --Oatmeal batman 06:05, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Powerup system change = no