lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Eddy Clearwater

message: I was wondering how come they have no info on who will being playing Sunday, and its listed as Open mic? any insight on who might show up, old friend, great fan, miss the Sunday night parties. And of course always love to see you and your family. Thanks Lynn 
ps see if little eddy will come back he got rained out and we never saw enough of him  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.102.110.48 (talk) 23:08, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Muddy water tribute Westmont July 14 
Talk:List of adventure films of the 1930s

message: :: Andrzejbanas, I disagree with your exclusion of the Big Trail from 1930's adventure films. Just because it takes place IN the west and indeed has horses, does not preclude that is more of a western.  There are many films on that list that are more something else than an adventure, I could remove at least four on those criteria.  The Big Trail is unlike a standardized formulaic Hollywood 'western'  it is an epic travel adventure, where the entire families have picked up and MOVED in a place that has no roads.  When was the last time you watched it?   I was please to see that they will be releasing the Widescreen 70 mm Road Show version on DVD in the next few months. I am request that you put the film back until the such time as the list is over burgeoned with other films and one needs to make room by cutting out films with horses that took place in the 19th century America.  EraserGirl (talk) 22:27, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Alright, i'm didn't feel that strongly about the delete. Feel free to re-add it! Andrzejbanas (talk) 22:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: The Big Trail

message: Before you get itchy fingers reaching for the delete button. Taken in context Flash Gordon IS a 1930s adventure film. It is only in retrospect that we lump it in with the 'sci fi' films of a much later era. Forrey Ackerman didn't even coin the term until 1954.  Flash and Buck may indeedbe the seed from which modern sci fi has spawned, but in 1930s, they were JUST adventure films that took place in alien worlds and in space, they were not YET part of a genre. I concede that I may be outvoted, but I am hoping it is by a consensus. EraserGirl (talk) 01:25, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No i'm actually comfortable with this one. I've done it for several 80's and 90's sci-fi films that have adventure films such as Jumper and Back to the Future and various films that involve and are strongly about adventure in space. (A trip to the moon, Forbidden Planet,  Barbarella, etc.) Andrzejbanas (talk) 02:03, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Flash Gordon
Talk:List of adventure films of the 1940s

message: I am interested in considering the addition of titles that take place during the WWII, but are not necessarily exclusively 'war' films.  Because a film is part of a genre, western, science fiction, WWII etc. should not preclude it from being considered an 'adventure' film. Candidates: Lifeboat (film),Sergeant York (1941), Sahara (1943) EraserGirl (talk) 17:35, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Some of these war films are definitly a mix of adventure and war like you suggested. I haven't seen Sergeant York but Sahara and Lifeboat definitly can be added. Keep up the great work! Andrzejbanas (talk) 19:33, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I was probably wrong about Sergeant York, but I am sure i can remember more. EraserGirl (talk) 20:16, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WWII
Talk:List of adventure films of the 1980s

message: Recently the article for the the list of adventures pages has received numerous unsourced additions. If these additions can not be sourced, they will be removed. Andrzejbanas (talk) 14:27, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsourced additions

message: On using the Turner Classic Movies database, I'm a bit skeptical about some additions. Using it to plug in genres seems a bit weak. I can not find any section on the site (or unique pages) saying where there information is taken from, or how it is sourced. Not to mention just using the articles as sources without including the year of release, cast, and director is not sourcing your content appropriately. Thoughts? Andrzejbanas (talk) 16:22, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: TCM genres
Talk:List of adventure films of the 1990s

message: I can't find much information about this being an adventure film. Remember that IMDb is not considered a valid source. I'm reverthing this edit for now, please discuss it before editing it again. Andrzejbanas (talk) 18:52, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Per the above discussion, I reverted to User:Andrzejbanas's revision. I agree this needs discussion before committing to the change. --Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 21:42, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Congratulatiosn andrzejbanas, you managed to make Matrix out of the adventure film when it is clearly one one of the most adventurous sci-fi films of the 1990s. 201.43.35.65 (talk) 22:49, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You say clearly, but that follows under WP:OR. There are people who are born now who could look at this list and not have a clue what adventures film from this decade were like. So nothing like this is 100% obvious to anyone. I've included cites in the action film lists, and they should be carried over to this as well. Cheers. Andrzejbanas (talk) 08:17, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, The book cited did mention it being an adventure film, but from constant and continuous research of the definitions of action films, adventure films, and science fiction films, this should not be in the genre. The citation was not about the film but a quick summary of plot for an unfamiliar reader from an author who's expertise is not in film. Andrzejbanas (talk) 12:17, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

text: Again, I'd like to bring stronger sources for genre here. In this book is a study of the Matrix and genre referring to it as an action film several times and as a science fiction film as well source. An editor here has pointed out that a source that refers to it as an adventure film, but I'd like to note this is from an expert on theatre, and not film, or genre who is only offering a breif plot summary of the film. Cheers. Andrzejbanas (talk) 12:34, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: The Matrix
Talk:Allegheny Mountain Radio

message: I support the proposed merge of WVMR, WVLS, and WCHG with this article. — Athaenara  ✉  09:11, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: (The post above refers to the  and  proposals which were added by BrokeThird3 in December 2007.)  — Athaenara  ✉  04:00, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: As of August 11, 2008, the merge requested by User:BrokeThird3 (which Athaenara supported) took place.  The WCHG, WVLS, and WVMR articles were merged into Allegheny Mountain Radio. - NeutralHomer • Talk 04:32, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merges

message: Just for the record, this is the section of the MoS I was referring to in my most recent edit: Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(capital_letters)#Section_headings - Dravecky (talk) 03:00, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Of the many rules of Wikipedia, that is the one that bugs me most.  "Manual of Style" looks more professional than "Manual of style".  Having that lower-case "s" on "style" looks sloppy and lopsided to me.  But, I understand your changes.  Take Care...NeutralHomer • Talk 03:20, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Manual of style

message: WVPC redirects here, but upon googling, I found out that WVPC stands for too many things, for example, West Virginia Patent Connections, Windows Virtual PC, etc. And Windows Virtual PC seems to be the major meaning if I should choose one. But WVPC as a station code seems to be a minor meaning, so I think a disambiguation page or altering of redirection would be needed. Okw1003 (talk) 12:37, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, call letters for the radio station would seem to be the default meaning.  The others are infrequently (if ever) used acronyms. Brian Powell (talk) 13:49, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

text: You should always remember that this is the "English" Wikipedia, not the "United States" Wikipedia. In the US WVPC may be used as a call sign, but out of there, other meanings are used more frequently. Okw1003 (talk) 06:51, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: If there are other meanings that come up and they are notable, then the call sign can be moved.  It isn't that big of a deal.  WVPC would actually be a disambig page anyway, if that were the case. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 18:26, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  About the abbreviation "WVPC"
Template talk:Serbian local elections

message: I've notified all the members of WikiProjects related to the Balkans of the ongoing debate; as there should be about 50 to 70, this should give a rather conclusive result to the debate, whatever result it is. —Nightstallion 15:18, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well done, I'd started with Kosovo contributors but you're well ahead. How did you notify them all so fast? DSuser 15:59, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I simply went to the pages of WikiProject Macedonia, WikiProject Croatia and so on and so forth, opened all their user pages as tabs, and then simply copy-pasted a short message to all their talk pages. It probably would have been even faster to use some kind of script (there's a lot of scripts around which are meant to assist with tasks on Wikipedia), but I prefer to do things by hand normally. —Nightstallion 16:02, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  FYI 

message: But Nightstallion, this way it seems as if "Vojvodina and Central Serbia" are one entity and "Kosovo" the other. And what's more, Central Serbia (or "Serbia proper") is not an entity - but Vojvodina and Kosovo are simply autonomous parts of Serbia, just like the 4 Cities (Belgrade, Kragujevac, Niš and Novi Sad). The only reason why Kosovo is put out is because in 1999 Serbia has transferred local self-government to the UNMIK (which holds local elections on its own). --PaxEquilibrium 16:46, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Mh. I still think it's clearer this way... We don't hurt anyone by stating "Vojvodina and Central Serbia", do we? It's just to differentiate the articles from each other... —Nightstallion 19:32, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, we aren't. But from the perspective of a man who just had tonsillectomy in there, we're misguiding. The first ones are normal "all-out", while the latter is simply because local administration is handled not by the Government of the Republic of Serbia, but by the United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo. --PaxEquilibrium 13:43, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I still believe it's better this way: The first articles are for those held in Central Serbia and in Vojvodina, the second is for those held in Kosovo... Where's the misguidance? —Nightstallion 15:31, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In the fact that the first isn't an entity and the fact that it's not conducted in Kosovo (as per Oliver Ivanovic in 2000 and 2004) just because there aren't a lot of voters (only some 200,000). Also, there are insinuations that the Kosovan Serbs might organize local elections just in North Kosovo. --PaxEquilibrium 19:27, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not an entity, granted, but it's just there to clarify where the elections where held at the same time -- and that *IS* in Central Serbia and Vojvodina... What do you mean about Kosovo? I don't understand you, I'm afraid. —Nightstallion 22:31, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:Cooperativity

message: I am very uncomfortable with this article. In particular the two last paragraphs are entirely wrong. 
First, unwinding of nucleic acid is precisely not a cooperative process. Nucleic acid dissociate as zippers. The stability is controlled by the identity of the adjacent nucleotides, that we call the Crick's pair. The stability of a duplex can be calculated by a linear combination of the free energy of all the Crick's pair it contains. Although the melting curve shows an abrupt transition (a sigmoid curve), it is not due to an energy linkage between the different nucleotides. See Le Novere. Bioinformatics. 2001 Dec;17(12):1226-7 and reference therein.
Second, the cooperativity of oxygen binding to hemoglobin has not much to do with entropy. The role of statistical binding and progressive increased affinity (Adair-Klotz or Koshland models) has been abandoned a long time ago for hemoglobin. We know that hemoglobin exists under two different, interconvertible, conformations, with different affinities for oxygen. And the cooperativity comes from this difference of affinity (enthalpy, not entropy) and the fact that the monomer are linked (they tend to be in the same conformation). Nicolas Le Novere (talk) 11:08, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article Cooperativity has significant overlap with Cooperative binding. There are clearly different ideas about how the concept should be defined and described, but these have not been acknowledged or addressed in the article. Jzpearson (talk) 09:17, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger Proposal
Talk:Manliness

message: See Talk:Manliness (book). Biscuittin 09:14, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

message: Summary: there's one search term "manliness". There are two possible referents for the term: manliness=masculinity and Manliness (book). There are only two namespaces required — Manliness and Masculinity. No DAB page or redirect is needed, only a DAB link at top of the article at this namespace.
At the moment, if someone types "manliness" they come to this namespace. What they probably want is found at the Masculinity article (no need for two articles on same subject). There was simply a redirect here until a book was written in 2006. Some will now want Manliness the book if they type "manliness", but are unlikely to know to look for Manliness (book). They might as well get the book straight away, since the topic of manliness is unlikely to ever need this namespace as it can be adequately covered at Masculinity. If ever further disambiguation is required, Manliness (disambiguation) already exists. The article on the book can be moved back to Manliness (book) if a hypothetical new topic has a better claim to being at this namespace.
Please note the current page at this namespace has little or no content, and the same for the edit history. Moving Manliness (book) to this namespace would be really appreciated.
Alastair Haines (talk) 09:12, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for speedy deletion
Talk:BootManager

message: Not that anyone cares:
It resides solely in the master boot record False. It can be installed to a particular partition.
with the exception of BeOS disk-in-a-file images on FAT32. Or EXT2 filesystems.
Whoever wrote that entry ought to be shot. Such a short page and two glaring mistakes.
And then there's the garbage about LILO. BeOS wasn't even designed to run on x86 hardware until after version 4, prior to that it ran on Mac PPC604 PCI hardware and a Hobbit-based machine called the BeBox.
:Wrong, right, WOEFULLY wrong. Bootman can't be installed to a parition; BeOS image.be files can run off ext2 true; BeOS R3 ran on x86, BeOS also ran on 603 PPC machines, and the BeBox as sold to general public was PowerPC not AT&T Hobbit. Now, want to arrange for that shooting to be of you, then? --85.134.154.44 19:23, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Page has been corrected with the single point the anonymous user was correct on. --85.134.154.44 19:26, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Paul Mowatt

message: :The result was Temporary keep per OTRS Ticket # 2007072910013442
First time I've ever seen or even heard of a "temporary keep".
I'm not familiar with OTRS, but I hazily infer from OTRS  that somebody has sent email to the Wikimedia Foundation in which he or she asserts a confidential reason for retention (or deletion) of the article. Really? This sounds batty to me. -- Hoary 09:19, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, sounds a bit batty to me, too.  A temporary delete might be appropriate with a BLP, but a "temporary keep?"   KP Botany 19:41, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, hello KP. It's good to see that we agree on something. Or then again, perhaps it isn't, as we were having such a good time arguing with each other on the "project page" and I hated to see that interrupted. Really, I didn't intend to have the last word, and think it was most unsportsmanlike that you were shut up at that juncture by some trifling speeding ticket or parking ticket or whatever. Please feel free to lob the ball (history book) back at me on this discussion page. -- Hoary 00:51, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Finals.  You'll have to wait until Friday.  However, I want to research Paul Mowatt off-line, and ask some friends who are fashion photographers.  IF the article is deleted before then, I can recreate if I have good material to recreate from.  Better to do something solid.  KP Botany 18:12, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Temporary keep"?
Talk:MD5CRK

message: The "perspective" section is wrong. An MD5 operation takes longer a floating point operation.
216.27.176.198 09:29, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

message: I can't find any references on this project. Did it achieve any relevant results? If the project had any significant results, wouldn't there be at least a published conference paper? 213.3.124.197 (talk) 10:39, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relevance 
Talk:Jim David (American football)

message: I have classified this article as a stub. It needs a bit more information to be a start. Its priority is assessed as mid. Capitalistroadster 09:38, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub classification
Talk:Northern Expressway

message: This article is helpful, but I've tried to improve it.
* I've made it clearer that the Northern Connector does not yet exist
* The actual suburb where it joins is Waterloo Corner, so I've added that in a couple of places. I wonder if we should be even more explicit: "just south of Brown Road, Waterloo corner". (See the map here ) Thoughts? Adpete (talk) Adpete (talk) 02:18, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, looking at the article history, there was originally a line in the table about the northern connector, which then got wikified. So by incremental edits, something not-very-sensible ended up in the table. So I'll just delete the Northern Connector part altogether (from the table) - it's just confusing and misleading. Adpete (talk) 04:20, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fixes 
Talk:Conyers Herring

message: I created this article on July 30, 2007. You can make contributions by adding relevant information. RS1900 09:52, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Conyers Herring
Talk:Canterbury Crusaders (speedway)

message: I have moved the article here from Canterbury Crusaders as nearly all links to the former were referring to the rugby team (Crusaders (rugby)) rather then the speedway. The rugby team—despite officially having changed it's name—is still very commonly referred to as the Canterbury Crusaders; especially outside New Zealand. Thanks. - Shudde talk 09:55, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Northcote Football Club

message: I've been reading a lot of old newspapers about the VFL, and I've never once seen a contemporary source refer to the Northcote Football Club as the Brickfielders; it doesn't mean one doesn't exist, but I've never seen it. I've seen reference to brickfielder winds at the Northcote ground, and I know the suburb had a brickworks, but that's the only link. However, I have seen contemporary sources in more than one newspaper refer to Brunswick as the Brickfielders back in the early 1900s (which I've added to the Brunswick page). There are several modern sources which refer to Northcote as the Brickfielders, but I assume that Full Points Footy is the only that did any original research, and that every other source on the internet just copied from it.
This is not to say that both clubs' players were not known for a time as the Brickfielders. The nicknames used at the time were not formally associated with the clubs, and I've seen Williamstown, Port Melbourne and Sandringham players all referred to as the Seasiders due to their bay proximity. Entirely possible that the two brickfieldside teams both attracted the name. Nevertheless, I've still seen it only in connection with Brunswick.
I'm not going to remove the reference to Northcote being called the Brickfielders from this page – since we consider Full Points Footy to be a reputable source and it would be a WP:NOR violation – but I just thought I'd mention here that I suspect FPF got this one wrong, and that the error has propagated through the internet since. Aspirex (talk) 08:37, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Aha. I've finally found a contemporary reference to Northcote as the Brickfielders in the Australasian in 1924. Aspirex (talk) 11:20, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  A comment on the Brickfielders
Talk:Garrard & Co

message: I would argue Edmund Cotterill (1795–1860) is a notable omission from the history section of this page, as he ran Garrards' design studio from 1833 and helped establish their reputation for producing elaborate sculptural groups and centrepieces. The works of Cotterill were crucial in cultivating royal patronage.Art Resources  — Preceding undated comment added 04:59, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edmund Cotterill (1795–1860) to be added? 

message: Eternity ring 18 carrot gold diamond and shapire 78.86.129.190 (talk) 21:04, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: How much is it worth 78.86.129.190 (talk) 21:04, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ring
Talk:County Court Business Centre

message: (1) I feel that authority for the Claim Production Centre stems from the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) themselves; the Practice Direction appears to be subsiduary and to expand Rule 7.10.
I have expanded Creation slightly to better show this.
(2) On a related note I am still trying to trace discussions and statutes that refer to the CCBC.
Dave T Hobbit 10:22, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

message: Should the article mention the controversy over Out-of-Time Statutory Declarations, Stays of Execution, and other procedural motions put before the Bulk Centre or its alter ego the Traffic Enforcement Centre (TEC) ?
Because the Centre has no real lawyers, these are simply passed to the plaintiffs, and it is the plaintiffs who are asked whether or not to accept them.  Jheald (talk) 23:22, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stat Dec controversy 
Talk:A Yank in the R.A.F.

message: Summary could possibly be expanded as follows:
The film starts with Tim Baker (Tyrone Power), a handsome daredevil pilot who lives for the moment, delivering military aircraft from the neutral USA to the UK in 1940, where he joins the Royal Air Force. In London, he meets an old flame, Carol Brown (Betty Grable), who by day is a first aid volunteer and at night sings in a club, which gives an opportunity to show her legendary legs. She is however attracted to his superior officer, Wing-Commander Morley (John Sutton), who has bags of English upper-class charm and a large country house to go with it. 
The mood changes when the Germans launch their attack on France and the RAF is thrown into the war. Baker and Morley fly off together to bomb Dortmund, have to bale out of their damaged machine over Holland and escape back to the England by boat. Tim is then switched to fighters and gets his revenge on the Luftwaffe over the beaches of Dunkirk, but is again shot down and evacuated back to Britain by sea. Carol and Morley are overjoyed to see him, but we are left wondering how often he will return.
The Lawless One (talk) 19:50, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled