Talk:Sailor Moon SuperS: The Movie

message: This article has character profiles, but no information on the movie in itself. --Alexie 22:32, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: NoInfo?

message: This article name is long beyond the point of usefulness. The common names guideline says to "use the most common name of a person or thing that does not conflict with the names of other people or things." Along with that, staying simple will make organization easier when we get Sailor Moon R movie and Sailor Moon S movie up and running. For all these reasons, I propose that we move this article to Sailor Moon SuperS movie.
If no one objects, I'd like to make this change in two days, on the 31st. --Masamage 00:41, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay then, I'm gonna go ahead! --Masamage 16:27, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd just like to make the comment that inside the DVD covers from Japan, it has written in English "Sailormoon SuperS - The Miracle of the Black Dream Hole". I thought it wouldn't hurt to mention it, since it's an official Toei title. It seems like they didn't add the first part of the title though, for whatever reason. ~ Fighter4luv (talk) 01:35, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename 

message: I was bold and swapped out the image for a nicer looking, yet similar one (It has most of the same art just moved around with out that ugly bottom) Lego3400:  The Sage of Time 23:47, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.
*Consider adding more links to the article; per WP:MOS-L and WP:BTW, create links to relevant articles.
*Per WP:CONTEXT and WP:BTW, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006, but do not link January 2006.
*Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
**Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant -  “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
*Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Malkinann 02:46, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Automated Peer Review

message: that section seems kinda dubious... 1st off... Why would Uranus need to steal them, She, Neputne and Pluto have them... not the other senshi. 2: She would just ask if she needed them, I'm sure the other senshi would have given her them if they had them. I just don't buy that that was the orignal plan...Lego3400:  The Sage of Time 16:46, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Mabye it was one of the idears they come up with but didnt work (probably for the same reasons you came up with)♥Fighting for charming Love♥ 16:52, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Weird or not, it's all true. And sourced, you might notice. :P --Masamage ♫ 17:13, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

text: Well its not like the anime ever worried about Canon in there movies ♥Fighting for charming Love♥ 17:14, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Production 

message: I have reverted the move to "Sailor Moon Supers movie" because there was no discussion. Please join in at Talk:Sailor Moon SuperS so we can keep this in one place. Thanks! --Masamage ♫ 17:51, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It was moved because the current name violates MOSTM. As soon as that other page gets moved (and it WILL be), this one will get moved too. TJ Spyke 00:25, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, of course. But please discuss it over there, not here. --Masamage ♫ 02:33, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

text: What is with these films anyway? Ideally, articles about originally non-English films should be named after the official English title, which (according to the article's current lead) would call for a move to Sailor Moon Supers the Movie: Black Dream Hole. – Cyrus XIII (talk) 21:50, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: These movies were released in officially-subtitled form by Pioneer before they were ever dubbed, and were titled the way these articles are now. (At least, my copy of the SuperS movie on VHS is labelled that way, and I'm pretty sure the S one I used to own was, too.) --Masamage ♫ 22:40, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I see, that makes sense. Then the articles should probably point out this discrepancy between the different the English-territory-releases more clearly, to avoid confusion. – Cyrus XIII (talk) 23:12, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: They definitiely should. I'm not sure about the details of that part of the production history, is all; just the general idea I just gave. Anyone know more? Dates, reason it wasn't licensed for dubbing at that time, etc? --Masamage ♫ 02:49, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversial move 

message: I just noticed this, but, uh...why does this "movie" poster say "memorial album" at the bottom? --Masamage ♫ 20:52, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Because someone used the cover from the anime book lol. ~ Fighter4luv (talk) 01:31, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poster confusion 

message: I say we should go by the release of it on Cartoon Network as the release date is very debatable. Amazon.com says 2000, where as the VHS says 1999. I do not believe that the VHS were released until after they aired on Cartoon Network because of this seeing as there is no actually founding proof as to when they were. In case anyone is wondering how I know this I own all 3 movies on VHS and only one says 2000 and that's Sailor Moon S: The Movie.
Here's the copyrights as seen on the back of all three:
*Sailor Moon R: The Movie
© MCMXCV TOEI ANIMATION CO. LTD ©1999 NAOKO TAKEUCHI/KODANSHA TOEI ANIMATION
For sale or rental in the United States and Canada. Artwork & Design ©1999 Pioneer Entertainment (USA) LP
All rights reserved. Manufactured for and distributed by Pioneer Entertainment (USA) LP
*Sailor Moon S: The Movie
© 1994 TOEI ANIMATION CO. LTD ©2000 NAOKO TAKEUCHI/KODANSHA TOEI ANIMATION
For sale or rental in the United States and Canada. Package Design ©2000 Pioneer Entertainment (USA) LP
All rights reserved. Manufactured for and distributed by Pioneer Entertainment (USA) LP
*Sailor Moon SuperS: The Movie
© 1995 TOEI ANIMATION CO. LTD ©2000 NAOKO TAKEUCHI/KODANSHA TOEI ANIMATION
For sale or rental in the United States and Canada. Artwork & Design ©1999 Pioneer Entertainment (USA) LP
All rights reserved. Manufactured for and distributed by Pioneer Entertainment (USA) LP
Notice SuperS has 2 different ones...as I pointed out debatable and we should probably just use the Cartoon Network airdates instead of claiming the VHS's came out in 2000 when it is really unknown. JamesAlan1986 (talk-Contributes) 11:28, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Debatable Release date 

message: This is really getting out of hand. The official translated title is "Pretty Soldier Sailor Moon Super S". An IP has done a cut-and-paste translation, which is already a mess. Even Viz's official translations refer to it as just "Super S". Also, in the advertisements, there are no ":" when mentioning titles except for separate ones. However, to avoid an edit war, I want to discuss this matter on the talk page. Thoughts? Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 21:26, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Excuse me? But you got this all wrong. You said you were putting a move request to have the page changed to Sailor Moon SuperS: The Movie which it is as all postings on the page have the SuperS together not apart as the title of the page does which has it as Sailor Moon Super S: The Movie, so I see no reason why the page should not have been moved to reflect what is shown on the page. I think someone likes to cause problems. 184.16.64.8 (talk) 00:01, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

text: Also the ":" and the capitalized T I was talking about was for the English dub title which was posted as Sailor Moon SuperS the Movie: Black Dream Hole when it should have been Sailor Moon SuperS: The Movie: Black Dream Hole like the rest of the titles on the page do. Get your facts straight dude. 184.16.64.8 (talk) 00:12, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

text: Final add on, if anyone would care to go to the official Japanese website the entire series, including the TV series and movies have been put under the title Pretty Guardian Sailor Moon, yes its official and original translation was Pretty Soldier and I do not deny that but that does not change the fact that they are currently being advertised as Pretty Guardian, Sjones23. 184.16.64.8 (talk) 00:25, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Looking at all of the English language sources in the article, they consistently use "Super S" instead of "SuperS". This includes the interview with director Kunihiko Ikuhara where he uses the term "Super S". Following WP:COMMONNAME, "Super S" should be the variant used. —Farix (t | c) 00:57, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: You can't base on one source and call it common most fans base the name on the advertised logos which when you look at both the US and Japanese logos they have it as "SuperS" not "Super S" so if you want to get technically both are common names so which do you go by? The official logo or how people put it? 184.16.64.8 (talk) 17:54, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Note if you look at the page on Sailor Moon Wiki they base it on the logo instead of how people put it. Shouldn't Wikipedia? Isn't that how an encyclopedia is suppose to work? 184.16.64.8 (talk) 17:57, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page discussion