Talk:Mazher Mahmood

message: ::Please note the above comment is unsigned. The Mazher Mahmood page has a history of illiciting strong opinions and there is a suspicion among some editors of the page (please click on the archive link to see) that Mahmood himself attempts to dispute some of its contents. It is recommended that editors of the page read the archive before proceeding to avoid replication of comments. 193.129.65.37 03:35, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Having brought the articles references up to date, I am concerned that employees of News International are adding/subtracting to the article: some of the IP address trace directly back to their HQ. Hence have added the autobiog tag Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 20:41, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Autobiog tag

message: It's a minor point, but a couple of times the article says that Mahmood "posed" as the fake sheikh.  Surely he IS a fake sheikh and he poses as a real one?  Earldelawarr (talk) 11:54, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Posing

message: Editors might want to be wary of unfairly extemporising on what they think the present position means.  For example, the CPS has not said that it is investigating Mahmood with a view to perjury charges, as a recent edit said.  The courts are in a position to find his evidence unsafe and revisit convictions without going the next, and much more difficult, step of imputing motives. Bluehotel (talk) 19:31, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  CPS investigation 

message: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-29985604
Not adding it to the article because of some WP:RS concerns. 
Perhaps someone more familiar with the subject matter could comment? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:19, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  BBC Article referencing "Mazher Mahmood" 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Mazher Mahmood. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060411003343/http://www.respectcoalition.org:80/%3Fite%3D1027 to http://www.respectcoalition.org/?ite=1027
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:20, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The article lacks a photograph of the subject in the usual place. Several media sources have published Mazher Mahmood's police custody photograph making it 100% clear it's the man this article's about.
E.g.,
Press Gazette Mazher Mahmood's cover is blown as custody picture released and his image widely used by media
Mail Online British reporter 'Fake Sheikh' jailed for 15 months
BBC News Mazher Mahmood: 'Fake Sheikh' jailed over Tulisa case
The Irish News 'Fake Sheikh' Mazher Mahmood facing jail after guilty verdict in Tulisa case
The Guardian Mazher Mahmood: a timeline of the 'Fake Sheikh's rise and fall
BuzzFeed “Fake Sheikh” Journalist Mazher Mahmood Jailed For Evidence Tampering
I don't know the proper procedure for causing one of these confirmed photos to appear on the article page. Could someone either give me advice on what to do or take the appropriate steps themselves?
Michael F 1967 (talk) 22:44, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confirmed photo - how to add? 

message: "The programme also included unseen footage..."
How can a televison program include unseen footage.
Did the writer mean previously unseen? Or perhaps the footage was not shown but only described?  it is not clear.
If the footage was shown, it can't be "unseen"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:301:777C:C750:B556:C29A:F8AE:4847 (talk) 22:24, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "unseen footage"