Talk:Diaphragm pump

message: The line that states "This action is similar to that of the cylinder in an internal combustion engine." is a highly unsuitable comparison for a diaphragm pump. This quote would probably be quite fitting for a piston pump, but does not help to accurately convey the operation of a diaphragm pump.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.210.141.175 (talk) 21:26, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poor Article 

message: The mini diaphram section was added on November 26, 2010. The next day User:Velella removed the link to the pump manufacturer, but not the rest of the section.  Today I noticed what seemed to be copied from the manufacturer, and I attempted to undo, but my action had no effect, and was not logged.  Next, I tagged the page.  Now I must step back, because I don't quite know what I am doing. Wikfr (talk) 21:38, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy/paste 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.sikopump.com/En/DP.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Voceditenore (talk) 09:53, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Diaphragm pump. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111009123356/http://cdxetextbook.com/fuelSys/gasoline/carbsysComp/fuelpumpelec.html to http://www.cdxetextbook.com/fuelSys/gasoline/carbsysComp/fuelpumpelec.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:17, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Would you allow me to develop a Double Diaphragm Pump page to Wikipedia? I there already is a Diaphragm Pump page here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diaphragm_pump.
How does Wikipedia make the determination when to add a secondary, more focused page on a product technology?
Double diaphragm pumps are widely recognized in the pump world...by the Hydraulic Institute, for example.
Please let me know if I should try to add a Double Diaphragm Pump page, or simply edit the existing Diaphragm Pump page.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.215.120.195 (talk) 17:43, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Double Diaphragm Pump page?