Talk:Cologne Cable Car

message: This page requires clarification by someone familiar with the history and geography of the Cologne Aerial Tramway.
The present description is not expressed in idiomatic English so its accuracy is difficult to judge.
:Why use the word "idiomatic"? It's not in English. "rechtrheinische"! Mein Fuß!--SilasW (talk) 19:06, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: These two articles are about the same subject; this is the more comprehensive and less likely to be confused. There are actually 2 Rheinseilbahns now - this one and the one being built in Koblenz. Also the official site calls it the Kölner Seilbahn in German, not the Rheinseilbahn, and the "cable car" in English. Admittedly looking at the size it is more of a gondola lift which is a small type of cable car!
If others are content, I am happy to merge the existing Rheinseilbahn content into this article and set up dab and redirects from Rheinseilbahn. --Bermicourt (talk) 18:34, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The merger is done and Rheinseilbahn has been turned into the dab page which should remove the inaccuracy and confusion. The Koblenz Cable Car article can now be created as well. --Bermicourt (talk) 10:57, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger with ''[[Rheinseilbahn]]'' 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: no consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover) CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE (please mention me on reply) 04:41, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Note: WikiProject Transport has been notified of this discussion. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 09:38, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

text: Support per nom. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 10:09, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

text: Oppose. This is a tricky issue but the nom has been honest that this is an opinion ("I think [other articles] has the right capitalization style") and a hunch ("I'm pretty sure most of the English sources are leaching off our capitalization..."). Actually the book sources in this case overwhelmingly (6 to 1) prefer to use "Cologne Cable Car" and they are not leaching off Wikipedia. Also I'd suggest these are proper names i.e. names of something that is unique. If we use "Wendelstein cable car", it suggests there are several cable cars on the Wendelstein and that the article (because Wikipedia doesn't like plural article titles) is about all of them. But, in fact, there is only one Wendelstein Cable Car. I understand some editors' may naturally feel lower case is right, but this may be more down to the fact that there has been an American trend towards lower case since the 1990s which is slowly being copied elsewhere in the English world, so we are becoming more used to it. But proper names for unique objects are still capitalised e.g. the Twin Towers or the Pentagon, not the twin towers and the pentagon. Bermicourt (talk) 12:00, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

text: Support per nominator. No evidence for proper names.  Killuminator (talk) 19:18, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 21 May 2023