Talk:Quiz show scandals in the United Kingdom

message: Looking at the sections regarding the controversy of quiz shows and channels, these points could be levelled at a number of quiz shows/channels. Rather than repeat everything in every article, would it be better to place everything here with a brief explaination in the quiz show/channel articles about the controversy of these shows/channels specific to the article? Any general criticism/controversy that isn't relevant to the article should be merged here. --tgheretford (talk) 18:00, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: All the sections concerned have been merged --tgheretford (talk) 13:44, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Criticism - Merge

message: I am suggesting that the information from 2007 British television phone-in scandal should be merged into this section. I don't personally think the current situation in participation television needs have its own article, especially as most of what is coming out is already covered in this article. As a consequence, would it be better to rename this article participation television so as to not only embrace quiz channels, but premium rate phone ins, psychic and adult call-in shows? --tgheretford (talk) 18:49, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge done (for some reason, I got the warning template, even though I didn't start the article..?) but it needs a lot doing to it. I would do it, but I am busy at the moment, so I have tagged that section accordingly. --tgheretford (talk) 07:46, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

text: The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the proposal was No consensus.  —Wknight94 (talk) 17:11, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[2007 British television phone-in scandal]] merge proposal and move proposal 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Quiz channel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20061202113616/http://www.digitalspy.co.uk:80/article/ds40160.html to http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/article/ds40160.html
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20060618144030/http://www.bbc.co.uk:80/radio4/youandyours/items/01/2006_20_fri.shtml to http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/youandyours/items/01/2006_20_fri.shtml
*Added  tag to http://linstantgagnant.ca/%20
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20080806071108/http://www.playtvusa.com:80/es/index.php?page=home to http://www.playtvusa.com/es/index.php?page=home
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070402230234/http://www.calltv.com:80/france.html to http://calltv.com/france.html
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20140818204527/http://eurominuty.joj.sk:80/eurominuty-o-relacii.html to http://eurominuty.joj.sk/eurominuty-o-relacii.html
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070424151122/http://www.calltv.com:80/shows.htm to http://www.calltv.com/shows.htm
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20140813005336/http://8tv.ru/pdfdoc.pdf to http://8tv.ru/pdfdoc.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:00, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. Uncontested RM (closed by non-admin page mover) ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 21:50, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Quiz channel →  – The article has, for a long time, only talked about quiz show scandals over 15 years ago, and does not cover anything like a proper encyclopedia topic. So I think it's better to re-appropriate this article for what it does do, and turn the article title into a redirect to whatever the most appropriate list article is. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:27, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 5 September 2023