lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:CM Punk

message: Add PWI award: Feud of the Year (2022) vs MJF  with source:  67.249.118.52 (talk) 02:30, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: This is already listed in the Championships and accomplishments section. Prefall 02:34, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 12 December 2023 

message: The link in the infobox is dead while in "External links" it redirects to his Twitter. BinaryBrainBug (talk) 21:45, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Went ahead and removed it. The website used to be its own thing, but seems to have been redirected sometime in the past two years. Social media links are to be avoided per WP:ELNO, and he hasn't used Twitter since 2022, anyway. Prefall 22:18, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official website 

message: To "Other Media" under "Video Game Appearances" -> CM Punk will be featured in WWE 2K24 as downloadable content. Source: official WWE Games account 67.249.118.52 (talk) 02:39, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 27 February 2024 

message: Under CM Punk's "Championships and Accomplishments section, can we add that he was the Second OVW Triple Crown champion. This information appears on the page Triple Crown page as a source, and other wrestlers such as Brent Albright and Cody Rhodes have their placement as an OVW Triple Crown Champion placed on their Championships and Accomplishments, therefore I perceive that it is relevant enough to list on CM Punk's page as well. Golbez01 (talk) 00:32, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. User:CanonNi (talk|contribs) 02:57, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 1 April 2024 

message: Should we add to the stuff hes talking about in the ariel helwani interview about aew? Imdeadinside12 (talk) 19:36, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Strikes me as somewhat WP:UNDUE. Wikipedia is not the news — Czello (music) 21:12, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ariel Interview
Talk:Brad Halsey

message: Dwpaul, your source says nothing of a date, there's nothing there that even says he died on the 31st when 99% of other sources say he died on the 4th, the USA Today link doesn't even have a date for his death, just the article, which was on the 4th as well. Please get it right and figure out this thing. Thanks.
~OtakuSRL  — Preceding unsigned comment added by OtakuSRL (talk • contribs) 22:12, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Take another look at the sources. Dwpaul Talk    01:57, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Death date

message: I suppose I shouldn't be surprised about the substance use and mental health issues that are detailed in this huge USA Today piece. The question is, for the stuff that happened during his career, should that go within the "Career" section, or into a "Personal life" section? – Muboshgu (talk) 21:13, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Substance use and mental illness
Talk:Internet keyboard

message: For a March 2005 deletion debate over this page see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Internet keyboard
----
*Sorry, but due to an improper VfD closing, this article has been restored, and should not be deleted again, until proper measures have been taken to finalize the debate--152.163.100.12 22:03, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe the anonymous editor is referring to my closure of Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Internet keyboard (2nd nomination) rather than to SimonP's closure of Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Internet keyboard.  My closure, as a non-admin, was simply to close as merge the nomination of this article after it was nominated following being merged (per the first nomination) but not yet having been redirected. -- Jonel | Speak 22:13, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Three Rings Design

message: I think that the "Game Gardens" section of the Puzzle Pirates page should be moved over here. Game Gardens isn't really related to puzzle pirates, any more than a library or game engine is related to a program that uses it. 
Additionally, with B!H about to be released, it is very likely that GG will be expanded to include the library used in that game.
--Keybounce 18:54, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Game Gardens: Move from YPP page or not 

message: Should the Ringers' upcoming game, MetaSOY be included here?--Remalle 16:36, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it doesn't look like there's all that much to say about it (yet), sooo.... Nifboy 16:58, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Does this count?--Remalle 21:02, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  MetaSOY 

message: I don't remember where I read this, but there were a couple news sites mentioning that Sega had shut down Three Rings. Their MMOs are now under new management. If someone can dig up a source, it'd probably be a good idea to include it. --Thunderbird8 (talk) 22:13, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The studio was shut down by SEGA as part of a March 2016 announcement. On April 6, 2016 it was announced through Puzzle Pirates and Spiral Knights forum posts that the games, communities and some staff were being transferred to a new company called Grey Havens LLC to allow their continued operation. --Sagaciousuk (talk) 13:39, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Company change
Talk:Sea sock

message: For a March 2005 deletion debate over this page see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Sea sock
----
I don't see how "spray deck" and "sea sock" are different.  If they are, could you explain how they are different?  Joyous  (talk) 21:31, August 23, 2005 (UTC)
:A spray deck seals between the deck of the kayak and the waist/torso of the paddler. A seasock seals against the cockpit rim of the kayak, and goes intro the kayak, forming a sock into which the paddler puts his legs and lower torso. The aim of the spraydeck is to stop water to get into the cockpit, the aim of the seasock is to minimize the amount of water that can get into the cockpit. When using a seasock a sprayskirt is typically also used at the same time. Thus the design and use of the two are completely different. I hope this made it a little bit clearer. Mossig (talk) 16:04, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Guatemalan Party of Labour

message: Why not Guatemalan party of work, which is a better of translation of trabajo? also why spell labour as we British do when the article is written in American? Or am I missing something? --SqueakBox 20:44, Mar 31, 2005 (UTC)
:I doubt there is any party in the world whose name is translated into English as "Party of Work." The sources I consulted when I wrote the essay this article is derived from almost always used "Labor/Labour" instead of "Work" or "Workers'". —Seselwa 01:34, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Monomorphism

message: In context of polymorphism, monomorphic means the opposite (not genetically different from). Where should this fact go? --134.36.64.135 (talk) 14:07, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Where it currently is: at the top of the page, where there is a link directing readers to the page on polymorphism for other uses. Magidin (talk) 14:38, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where does this fact fit? 

message: "...a left-cancellative morphism, that is, a map f : X → Y such that..." — but in this generality a morphism is not a map, is it? Boris Tsirelson (talk) 11:05, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably should be "arrow" instead of "map". Magidin (talk) 14:16, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  More general setting of category theory 

message: The 'Properties' section could do with an expansion, if anybody gets the time. Joel Brennan (talk) 20:05, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Properties
Talk:Amiga Old File System

message: Moved this page from OFS to Amiga_Old_File_System, mimicking Amiga_Fast_File_System.
LjL 21:20, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Can some Amiga expert revise the following paragraph? It refers to obscure terms without explaining them, and its composition resembles a stream of raw thoughts. This makes the paragraph incomprehensible to a reader who is not versed in intricacies of Amiga file systems.
"Metacomco, BSTRINGS, BPOINTERS, and family contained in the Amiga FS entered the scene when it was decided that the originally planned OS would take too long to be developed in time for the launch of Amiga. Consequently, Metacomco grafted onto the filesystem a lot of things that the old Amiga Inc. has changed."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.185.206.177 (talk) 04:03, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incomprehensible Paragraph
Talk:Rasmussem, Inc.

message: -
This is odd, to say the least; an article on a fictional company that appears in a book that doesn't have a Wikipedia article.  It seems to me that it should be deleted, but does anyone have anything to say its defence before I start a VfD?  (I'll drop a copy of the notice off at the article-creator's page.) Mel Etitis  (Μελ Ετητης) 21:21, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)

message: No point of having this article apart from the novel. Fails notability. --Zer0~Gravity (Roger - Out) 11:43, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Premeditation

message: Should this be deleted? Really, it's just a definition of the word. Wikipedia isn't a dictionary, is it?
----
I think it should be merged with or redirected to Premeditated murder.Crater Creator 07:47, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. -Lamarcus (talk) 03:05, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Politics of Honduras

message: Other articles, and the template in this one, say the presidency is disputed. --Ong saluri (talk) 06:41, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Presidency disputed 2009 

message: The history section has weasel words and a number of issues. It is likely that the entire section needs a rewrite.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.134.241.22 (talk) 15:27, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias and POV in history section 

message: this might want a link back to Comayagua prison fire EdwardLane (talk) 10:21, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prison overcrowding 

message: I know next to nothing about Honduran politics, so I'm ill-suited to make any sort of substantive/content change here. My issue is more to do with the template, of how the parties are listed.
Each party is identified by name, both in English and Spanish, along with the date of their founding. Easy enough. But the 'National Party' is distinguished as "Dominated Honduran politics from 1933-1957", while the 'Democratic Unification Party' entry gives the circumstances under which it was founded, and the 'Innovation and Unity Party' identifies where it falls on the political spectrum ("moderate leftist, social democratic").
All of this information (and much more) can no doubt be found on each party's individual Wikipedia entry. This is supposed to be only a cursory glance, a summarized list. We should standardize precisely what information is given for each of the parties and stick to that template. PublicolaMinor (talk) 06:59, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The whole section is very outdated. Up to 2013 election the party system was relavtively stable, now there are far more parties in the fray. --Soman (talk) 16:15, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Standardize list of political parties
Talk:Sopot, Zagreb

message: I am unsure whether my categorisation as ":Category:Towns in Croatia" is the best possible fit. Really their needs to be a category like ":Category:Neighbourhoods of Zagreb" or just :Category:Zagreb. --VivaEmilyDavies 22:40, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: You may use :Category:Neighborhoods of Zagreb. Admiral Norton (talk) 23:41, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
Talk:List of towns and villages in Northern Ireland

message: the city is widely known as both "Derry" and "Londonderry", so in both the interests of impartiality, and of this being an encylopedia which contains as much information as possible, it surely does make sense to list both names!
--feline1 22:40, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Derry/Londonderry
Talk:Reef (band)

message: "and I cried at the Common One; for weeks aft' he died" (from "Place Your Hands")
Q: Anybody know what 'Common One' refers to?68.174.8.118 (talk) 17:11, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe Common One is a reference to a song by Van Morrison. 178.17.43.194 (talk) 11:20, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  And it only took 14 years to answer. --Muhandes (talk) 18:29, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Lyrics Question

message: Why has this been marked for deletion?  Reef is a famous rock band and should have an article written about them.  They played at the Reading Festival in 1999.  There offical website is http://www.reef.co.uk.
That link doesn't work any longer. 68.174.8.118 (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 17:21, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion?

message: This page needs a lot of work done to it. For a famous band, they've sure been fobbed off a lot when it comes to having a decent Wiki page.
:But surely it is a lot better now ?! 
:Derek R Bullamore 22:33, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs work

message: Every single date in the Commercial success section is out by a decade.. Just look at the discography to see how the chronology is all messed up.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by LivinLOS (talk • contribs) 07:28, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terrible page
Talk:Jacques Barrot

message: There's quite a bit of (voluntary) confusion here. Jacques Chirac, as president of France, cannot grant amnesty; he can only grant pardon. The so-called "presidential amnesties" are actually laws voted by the Parliament of France, traditionally after each presidential election, cancelling the conviction of various petty crimes. They have been increasingly criticized, but some people argue that they may be useful in lowering prison overpopulation.
Such laws have broad categories of offenses that are amnistied (ex: minor traffic offenses) as well as offenses for which the president can nominate individuals that are to be amnistied. I do not know whether this was the case for Barrot. David.Monniaux 22:57, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: On November 4, User:Boson removed the content from this page about Barrot's fraud conviction - quite rightly, because it is controversial material about a living person and was unsourced. This source, a BBC News profile, seems reliable enough, and so should be used if anyone wants to add the material back into the article:  Terraxos (talk) 02:30, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Source for fraud conviction
Talk:Nigel Farage

message: Should this be mentioned in the lead? Pinging @Martinevans123 per his edit summary. I've no real view on it, but if it's included it shouldn't stick out like it currently is doing. Tim O'Doherty (talk) 22:05, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It sticks out in a similar way in the lead section of Nick Hancock Matt Hancock, not so much at Nadine Dorries and Kezia Dugdale. Perhaps there will soon come a day when all MPs will be obliged to compete. Until that day comes, I think it's notable and thus lead-worthy. One might argue that Farage's alleged fee of up to £1.5 million makes it even more notable. Happy to hear what other editors think. Martinevans123 (talk) 22:14, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Nick Hancock? Sure, he nicked someone else's wife, but for now, "Matt"'ll probably do ;) Tim O'Doherty (talk) 22:25, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: "They Think It's All Over.... it will be if Nigel gets hold of them." (?) Martinevans123 (talk) 18:42, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

text: Following his very cheeky contribution, perhaps his appearance deserves to be right at the bottom? As disturbing as George Galloway's Big Brother cat antics. Martinevans123 (talk) 15:07, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''I'm a Celeb'' 

message: Edit the other political affiliations section on the infobox to include the Anti-Federalist League from 1992–1993. Currently, the infobox states that Farage was a member of the Conservatives until 1993, this is incorrect and also contradicts the body of the article. 
 195.99.8.88 (talk) 02:00, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: thank you! Irltoad (talk) 08:42, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 23 March 2024 

message: 195.213.249.33 (talk) 16:35, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Disregard, no longer necessary. 195.213.249.33 (talk) 17:46, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 3 June 2024 

message: Change June 2024 to June 3rd 2024 2A02:C7C:5802:DA00:B1BC:8200:9238:703 (talk) 00:19, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: The infobox says the date he became party leader already, I'm not sure that the lead needs that clarification. Irltoad (talk) 07:54, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 4 June 2024 

message: The picture of Farage in the infobox is 6 years old, there isn't much in the public domain but there is a 2020 picture from Gage Skidmore:  Dingers5Days (talk) 18:18, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  New picture for Farage?
Category talk:Businesspeople

message: This category and subcategories are misleading to the subject at hand - they emphasize "magnates" as a major category in business, implying that individual ownership and wealth are the main driver in the formation of business.  This is an obsolete and misleading representation.  --Leifern 23:23, 2005 Mar 31 (UTC)
I disagree. This is a category of business people / people in business; there's no attached commentary on how these people are the drivers of the economy. Since wiki articles are supposed to be about people of note, there will likely never be articles about stock room boys, mail clerks, etc. There is already :Category:Labor unions, which includes sub-cats on unionists, etc. I don't see any practical/realistic way this cat could be expanded or renamed to satisfy your NPOV complaint.
Feco 23:46, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The rejoinder is valid, because the POV is intrinsic to business biography as an endeavor, or to biography as a method in business studies, or whatchamacallit. --P64 16:45, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Unititled comment
Talk:MilitaryWeek.com

message: I have again corrected your revision. Your comma behind the quotation mark is grammatically incorrect as is your use of the semicolon. 
But don't take my word for it. Look it up in any book of English grammar.
:Check Wikipedia:Manual of style.  You're taking your own custom to be standard; I assure you that it isn't, and in this case your structures on commas go against Wikipedia style.
:Please sign your messages. Mel Etitis  (Μελ Ετητης) 08:46, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)

message: I have reverted it back to "billed as" instead of "billing itself as." The latter is not accurate and is less concise.
If you look on the site you will see that a newspaper or magazine has made the claim. MilitaryWeek is billed as... it does not bill itself.
Thank you.
:I have looked at the site, adn can see no mention of this phrase at all.  I've therefore deleted it altogether (it was in any case unsuitable for an encyclopædia article). Mel Etitis  (Μελ Ετητης) 21:14, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Billed as
Talk:Beethoven's Last Night

message: There's a number of additional Beethoven allusions through BLN, but I'll have to listen again to the album and do some research to make sure I've got all the right pieces.--patton1138 00:27, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I just noticed that too. Beethoven's "immortal beloved" is a well known historical mystery. I've added a reference to this effect. Raul654 00:17, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

message: I think a subsection needs to be made on this. It took me by surprise when I heard Beethoven's 8th piano sonata and Chopin's Op 68 Mazurka No. 3 to find the tunes were identical to those of Mephistopheles's Return and The Dreams of Candlelight respectively. I can identify most of the sections which are obviously references (although the track Beethoven still eludes me) but I'm curious if there were others I missed,.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.135.18.101 (talk) 00:20, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Musical References 

message: Shouldn't the :Category:Works based on the Faust legend be added to this article? -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 03:22, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Faustian legend

message: "After Beethoven's death, love letters from the composer were discovered inside his desk, addressed to his "immortal beloved", the identity of whom still remains a mystery. Both Therese Malfatti, one of Beethoven's students, and Countess Thérèse von Brunswick have been suggested as the mystery woman. "Many have speculated over whom might be the recipient, made more difficult by the fact that there is no year or place given on the letters. But [Maynard] Solomon, following Beethoven's date on the letters, his movement during the period (1812) and studying the persons close to Beethoven, has come to the solution that Antonie Brentano must be the answer, now generally accepted as being correct." http://home.swipnet.se/zabonk/cultur/ludwig/beeim.htm "
This is contradicted by https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonie_Brentano
"Although Solomon's theory enjoyed a long vogue, it has been widely discredited by scholars such as Goldschmidt, Beahrs, Gail S Altman and Marie-Elisabeth Tellenbach. Solomon himself acknowledges that his evidence is at best circumstantial. As Beethoven enjoyed a deep friendship with Antonie Brentano's husband, it is unlikely that, given what is known about Beethoven's moral code, he could have engaged in an affair with a friend's wife. In addition, there is strong evidence that the relationship between Antonie and Franz Brentano was not as unsatisfactory as Solomon purports. [...] It was only recently that Solomon's Antonie hypothesis was finally and thoroughly refuted. The answer to this perennial question can be found already in the second part of Beethoven's famous Letter: [...]"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:2F0E:C2F0:127D:FC53:D339:7978:6ABE (talk) 15:03, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed reference
Talk:Goražde

message: Does anybody have a picture of new mosque in Gorazde. I forgot the name, but it's the biggest mosque in Bosnia and possibly in the Balkans. Bosniak (talk) 00:40, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Mosque in Gorazde? 