lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Basque Country (autonomous community)

message: I saw the series of reverts (three) that you have been doing. You removed the flag of the US State to which the Basque Country (autonomous community) belongs. Your reason is "unnecessary". That unfortunately is not a reason. What is unnecessary for you, might not be for others. The debate is whether or not the country is correct, and whether or not the flag is correct. If both are correct, and both are facts, then deleting it by means of saying is "unnecessary" is nothing more than ideological vandalism. Please, give a good reason on why we should remove the flag from the subdivision name when it is present in all regions of Spain. What is so special about the Basque Country (autonomous community) that we need to remove an actual factual truth? If you keep reverting without debating, you might be blocked from editing, Akerbeltz. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Temax (talk • contribs) 22:53, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The no flags policy has been explained to you, I have checked your history. If you can't read and comprehend Wiki policy then I politely suggest an alternative past time. There is nothing more to say other than that "US State" definitely doesn't apply. Akerbeltz (talk) 11:46, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I had a check of the claim that the flag is on "all regions of Spain", because if it was, that would be a pretty strong argument for it to be here for consistency. It isn't. Several articles (Asturias, Cantabria, La Rioja, Community of Madrid, Melilla, Murcia and Navarre) also have no flag. So about two-thirds do and one-third does not. Crowsus (talk) 12:15, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Definitely no strong consensus for other autonomous communities either. No-flags policy applies. Iñaki LL (talk) 18:48, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing flag of the country of origin 

message: Why not call it Basqueland? Wouldn't it make more sense in English? Wouldn't it be more accurate? There are tons of territories called blablabla-land in English, but blablabla country is not very common. 12qwas (talk) 16:02, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Cause nobody calls it that. We're not here to make up names. Akerbeltz (talk) 17:22, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Basqueland/Basque Land vs Basque Country
Talk:Paul Gallico

message: ...contrary to the statement on one website. The first prize winner was Kay Boyle's "Defeat", second Eudora Welty's "The Long Path," third Hallie Southgate Abbett "Eighteenth Summer." See The O. Henry Prize stories. Dpbsmith (talk) 00:28, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: "The Snow Goose", published in the Saturday Evening Post is among those listed under Best First-Published story. Mannanan51 (talk) 05:20, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  Actually, being included in the anthology is considered to be "a prize." "First prize" (and sometimes other ranked prizes" is a special designation in the annual volume. Hifrommike65 (talk) 07:12, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: However, The Snow Goose did not win "the" O. Henry Prize

message: I find it peculiar that this entry has no mention of his very popular novel "Mrs 'arris goes to Paris", even though it has a Wiki entry of its own.Saxophobia 08:15, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  no "Mrs 'arris" novels? 

message: Many (most?) of Gallico's novels are set in Britain or have a British background. Did he live there? I think we need some more biographical detail -- there's nothing after 1942.
Hypnopomp 20:20, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  His British connections? 

message: I don't like the "light, Sport" additions that were just made to the bibliography. I find them distracting and not very important.  Can we remove them please? --Knulclunk (talk) 01:29, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  bibliography 

message: This article is woefully short on documentation. It reads like a summary of standard library references such as Current Biography or the Gale Contemporary Authors series. Even direct quotes are not referenced. That prevents this article from being encyclopedic and hurts its credibility. Hifrommike65 (talk) 07:14, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of documentation and references
Talk:Bravo (editor)

message: Some of the text for the first version of this page came from WYSIWYG.
----
A page for Bravo (program), for which I do have manuals, will have to wait for another day, alas. Noel (talk) 17:10, 20 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Have you considered scanning and putting your Bravo manual online? That's exciting, I would personally like to know much, much more about the actual capabilities of Bravo. Dpbsmith (talk) 21:57, 20 Nov 2004 (UTC)

message: the EDIT command anecdote is presented as something "real" when it's clearly a joke. It may have been frustrating to use such terse command languate that you could so easily delete your entire document (by typing E followed by D), but you would not at all be in the habit or even have the urge to issue the command EDIT. You don't even type the word EDIT to any other editors. Bravo ran on the Alto which was GUI, and you weren't even going to type EDIT on the command line to launch it. It's just humor that typing the word EDIT would replace your text with the letter T. But ED had already deleted it all. Just weird to have a joke get it's own section as if it were serious. 2603:8001:D3F0:87E0:0:0:0:10D0 (talk) 21:14, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  EDIT command
Talk:Abu 'Afak

message: Shocking PC and Islamist Apologism. The First and only few sentences of the article can't even relate the BASIC point of the story: That Mohammed had abu afak Killed. 
-
Is this Frigging Yemen or Riyadh?
-
-The most Voluminous Western info site can't even write a one sentence summary of why abu afak is famous/the entry even exists. He WAS killed at Mohammed's behest.
-
-Can't you even write that he was "allegedly" killed at Mohammed's request so that people even know the point OF the entry?
-   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.250.60.244 (talk) 19:36, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

message: I have taken out the words "and primary" it is not a primary history and is in fact denounced for its many fabricated narrations by two of Islams primary figures Imam Malik and Imam Ahmad as well as Islam's primary expert on narrations Imam al dhahabi.Ibn kathir (talk) 02:14, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction 

message: I have changed the term murder for killing and killed, murder is not a neutral term and is passing judgment. I also question the validity of this translation as it is a private translation. the referenced work is in German and would have sourced its information from ibn ishaq and not a separate work as no other sources exist for this story. I am also removing him from the list of murdered writers since the entire case for murder does not exist in any source.Iβи Ķᾱŧhiɍ (talk) 07:37, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Excerpt from Aloys Sprenger 

message: i have removed the sentence "According to Ibn Ishaq, Abu 'Afak was assassinated." its guessing at ibn Ishaq's opinion while it was held that historians simply report without passing judgment, for example he may have very well known the weakness in the authenticity of the narrators but reported it for sake of cataloging what was out their which was the case with many other historians and hadith experts. Iβи Ķᾱŧhiɍ (talk) 07:44, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  lead 

message: Al Waqidi is not considered a reliable source by any of the Hadith scholars, and therefore this section about Waqidi's account should be removed completely. - Wakemeup38 (talk) 02:15, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Al Waqidi unreliable
Talk:IBM WebExplorer

message: What is the last version? Hobbes has 1.1h but the picture is from 1.2. -- Error 01:10, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Version

message: The shortcomings section is not a very useful/serious list. This is not a modern browser and it does not make sense to compare it to modern browsers. This browser was released in 1994, I had a quick look around and:
* PNG was first released in 1995
* In 1994 TLS was released as an experimental (and flawed in terms of security) feature of Netscape, not sure if it was even called HTTPS back then.
* HTML frames were standardised in HTML 4.0 which came out in 1997
* The first version of JavaScript was an experimental Netscape feature and came out in 1995.
--Anon 20:25, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shortcomings 

message: Will expand later this week...here are relavant links
* http://web.archive.org/web/19990224054302/http://www.toronto.edu/webdocs/HTMLdocs/OS2TOOLS/os2_browsers.html
* http://aeneas.ps.uci.edu/absoft/pc_e.htm#1.2g
* OS/2 Web Explorer from the February 7th, 1995, issue of PC Magazine Web ExplorerBy: Amarendra Singh
* http://pclt.cis.yale.edu/pclt/msupdate.htm
* http://www.cs.odu.edu/~cs778/ralf/13appendixC-doc.pdf -popular browser
Smallman12q (talk) 16:21, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links 

message: WebExWin seems to be the Toolkit to program on WebExplorer. --Error (talk) 01:54, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Toolkit

message: link is broken  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.135.145.68 (talk) 09:14, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link is broken 

message: has complained that two non-free images are used at :en:IBM WebExplorer.
If that is a problem, one should go.
From :template:Non-free no reduce:
: According to Wikipedia's policy for non-free content, the amount of non-free work should be as little as possible.
The non-free work in :File:IBMExploreWikipedia20040224.png is the user interface elements such as window decoration.
In :File:OS2 IBM WebExplorer.png, the page is a product of the US government, which maybe is also free.
Which should remain?
--Error (talk) 01:49, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images
Talk:Ciprofloxacin

message: Do I take for breakfast? 2001:5B0:4CD0:24F8:6463:D2B8:430C:4B8 (talk) 15:30, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

message: As of December, 2022, the FDA prescribing information for Cipro's boxed warning states:</br>
* Because fluoroquinolones, including CIPRO, have been associated with serious adverse reactions (5.1-5.16), reserve CIPRO for use in patients who have no alternative treatment options for the following indications:
** Acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (1.9)
** Acute sinusitis (1.11)
I'm not sure where these belong exactly;  they sorta imply that any prescribing reason other than those two is a contraindication (the wording of the FDA's statements to prescribers is more harsh and flat out says not to use them unless death would result otherwise, but it doesn't seem like the right place to put them.  It should probably be mentioned though, since these have effectively been relegated to use in people who won't survive without them and have one of two conditions (down from 3 listed earlier in 2022).</br>
Also, Aortic dissection is listed as an effect reported to the FDA by the article right now, but in December, 2018, it was added as a rare side effect (although not to the boxed warning) so this should probably be updated in the article.</br>
Finally, since these warnings were added across all fluoroquinolines prescribed to humans, all of the other articles relating to them need to be updated with current information.  I'm not really active enough on here to take this on but someone dealing with the pharma pages more regularly might want to look into it.  Some sort of "should be updated with developing information" might be warranted on these pages since the transition from boxed tendinitis warning to boxed "damage to nearly everything" was rapid;  I'd be amazed if these were allowed to be prescribed outside of hospital settings much longer, honestly. A Shortfall Of Gravitas (talk) 17:30, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contraindications, or where?  ...and Aortic Rupture + other Fluoroquinolines
Talk:Serine protease

message: Since this article is marked as high importance, it definitely needs some attention. I've started on it, but this article needs serious work!! A lot of the data on here is incorrect, too wordy or unnecessary/repeating.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by KingMunch (talk • contribs) 11:51, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  High importance! 

message: homology is about common ancestry and not about similarity per se. also serine proteinase and chymotrypsin are similar but not homologous I think  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.104.48.243 (talk) 21:22, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  homology 

message: Shouldn't this article mention tryptase? Thomas.Hedden (talk) 15:58, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tryptase ? 

message: 'Regulation of Serine Protease activity' should touch briefly on the effect of metal binding to regulate protease activity.
I'm well aware of the effect of this in the kallikreins and trypsin, thrombin and uPA.
B.T.Riley (talk) 02:52, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Allostery, exosites & regulation by metal-binding sites
Talk:Timeline of antibiotics

message: Xenleta (lefamulin) is not on the list. I tried to add it, but was afraid I'd mess up the formatting. I'm in a bit of a rush so I'm just dropping this here. FDA Article Here. 20:52, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: now it's been added to the list. If you find any ommisions don't hersitate to find out and fill gaps. Kpjas 13:38, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC)

text: I added Prontosil and Sulfanilimide, they're very old, and interesting for that very reason. User:Ray Van De Walker
I don't have the dates handy but someone should add Isoniazid.
Isn't Salvarsan an antibiotic? If yes, it should be listed as the first antibiotic ever, appearing on the market in 1910. --130.92.9.57 17:00, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

text: It is (albeit a narrow-spectre antibiotic). I also included Neosalvarsan, introduced in 1912. --84.72.116.141 19:00, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

message: Could we somehow indicate which are the first in their class ? or is there a class summary somewhere else ? - Rod57 (talk) 02:24, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I couldn't find a dated summary elsewhere so I've indicated some here. Incidentally the UK press is widely saying that the most recent class introduced was in 1987.  implies it was the Fluoroquinolones - Rod57 (talk) 00:26, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

text: fusidic acid (1962) could be the first or only sterol antibiotic ? - Rod57 (talk) 12:22, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  First in each class 

message: Is it any marketing approval, eg non US. eg Vancomycin is noted for 1955 but its FDA approval was in 1958. - Rod57 (talk) 00:24, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, the date criteria needs to be much more clear. Are the dates referencing when the drug was first discovered? Date when it was patented? Date when approved by the FDA? If the editors could clear up this ambiguity it would be much appreciated. 2601:442:C381:530:4536:33AE:5FBB:FD3C (talk) 00:47, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  What are dates based on 

message: The sources for this list would be very useful. Otherwise, it's just list without anything to back it up.
Anybody interested in going through the FDA database? http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/drugsatfda/index.cfm
Timfothergill (talk) 20:33, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Kac–Moody algebra

message: Aren't Kac-Moody algebras more general than this? Phys 01:59, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I admit that it may be the case, but it still seems as a fine definition for 90% of our real purposes... --Lumidek 02:19, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text:  It's not even clear to me that this is even a Kac-Moody algebra.  Which one is it? -- Walt Pohl 10:22, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not a Kac-Moody algebra. It's simply the tensor product over [0,2π) of a finite dimensional Lie algebra. Phys 03:55, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  More general

message: The link generator incorrectly links to a disambiguation page, my guess is that it should link to generator matrix or one of the articles listed in generator (mathematics). However I would appreciate it if someone a bit more knowledgeable on this subject can make the change. Thanks FlyHigh 12:54, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation Fix
Talk:Pompadour

message: The part about the Yakuza needs a better explanation.  Searching google for "define:afflection" or dictionary.com for "afflection" yields no results.  I can't think of what word this is supposed to be.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.192.101.159 (talk • contribs) 22:42, April 5, 2006
:I'm guessing that "affiliation" would work instead of "afflection" (re: Yakuza).  Anyone who knows better can change it back :) Jaeger5432 02:14, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yakuza: Clarification 

message: An illustrative image would be useful for this entry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bebop (talk • contribs) 
:I did a search of images here on Wikipedia and found this one:
:
:Adequate? -kotra 08:26, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like a good example to me.  It illustrates one of the styling methods in the Creation section pretty well and it's GNU tagged.  Done! - Jaguara 22:08, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image requested 

message: Bot isn't working. See:
* Talk:Pompadour (hairstyle) → 
* Pompadour → 
In ictu oculi (talk) 03:37, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:Video tape recorder

message: Is this page really necessary? There is already a page for the VCR. Perhaps the pages should be combined.
:On Japanese TV, they typically call any prerecorded video a VTR, so this page does seem relevant.
:: VTR is a video (tape) recorder which uses tape. VCR is a VTR which happens to use cassettes. The reel-to-reel VTR was invented and in common use for 15-20 years before VCRs were invented/common. To put the VTR information in VCR is probably misleading. Anyway, all VCRs are VTRs, but not vice versa. So technically, Japanese TV is correct (assuming they still use tape!) Fourohfour 11:07, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article says: requires 16 tracks for a single analog NTSC video frame or 20 for a PAL frame.  Earlier it indicates 16 scan lines per track, which seems to indicate that it is 16 or 20 tracks per field, not frame. (Not that 262.5 is divisible by 16.) Gah4 (talk) 21:53, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  field or frame?
Talk:Karla Faye Tucker

message: How in the wikipedia world do I add another topic to this discussion page????
Anyway, just wanted to ask whether it would be appropriate to point out Bush's hypocrisy in commuting
his buddy Lewis "Scooter" Libby's sentence while claiming his prison sentence was excessive.
Bush has a double standard of justice - one for himself and his administration, and another for
everyone else. With this POV you can see why I'm not writing the piece. marty8—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Marty8 (talk • contribs).
:You can add a new topic by clicking the "+" next to the edit button. As to the addition, you would need to have a cited reference from a reliable source in order to make that comment. And even then, it might run afoul of neutral point of view issues. However, a carefully phrased comment, precisely cited to a reliable source (and that source would have to make a direct comparison between Libby and Tucker) would probably be acceptable. --Eyrian 18:30, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This is an encyclopedic entry -- not a forum for you to argue your beliefs.--The Outhouse Mouse (talk) 15:56, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I hadn't known that Scooter Libby was a murderer. The things one learns at Wikipedia! 2604:2000:1580:415A:1920:48F:A553:49A1 (talk) 11:27, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hypocrisy
Talk:Hardwick, Baldwin County, Georgia

message: Is this related to Hardwick, Bryan County, Georgia? Wondering simply, -- Infrogmation 03:01, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't believe so. Ethan (talk) 19:25, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

message: If you would like to know why I assessed the article the way I have, please use my talk page. Ethan (talk) 19:25, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment 
Talk:Probot

message: What about the hidden track at the end? What's it called and who's singing it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pimpalicious (talk • contribs) 01:34, 21 November 2004
:at minute 8:56 begins the hidden song "I Am the Warlock", featuring Jack Black of Tenacious D FiggazWithAttitude (talk) 18:32, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about? 

message: I have never scene Probot written in all caps anywhere else. I think this article should be moved to 'Probot (band)'. Any objections/comments? Olliegrind 19:26, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Seen FiggazWithAttitude (talk) 18:31, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: name of page
Talk:Sixpence None the Richer (album)

message: I own the cd single "I Can't Catch You", so I was suprised to see that it wasn't even listed as one! I don't know how it charted as I ever only heard it on the radio once. If anyone could supply this information that would be great! Also, I believe the remix of "Love" was a radio single because I heard it on Sirius (I think) Satellite radio. An explanation for this would be great too! 172.164.69.142 16:46, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Disability etiquette/Archive 1

message: There is 'no' one, universal ruleset. Each disability is different, and each person is more different still. Thus, I won't try.
However, I can comment on rules for blind people. So I shall. Warning: I am grumpy.
#Do not take a blind person's cane, distract their guide dog, or distract someone guiding them. Taking their cane is like taking someone's prosthetic limb. More to the point, it is as if you casually walked up and ripped their eyes out. A guiding cane could never be a weapon. It would break.
#As a rule of thumb, if someone is using a cane, guide them by taking the elbow, not the hand. Additionally, take the elbow opposite of the hand holding the cane; This keeps you from throwing off the rhythm essential to proper use of the cane.
#It is distinctly unnerving to have someone come close to you and talk to you, and it's worse if you can't see them. If circumstances permit, say something from a distance first, so the person you're speaking to at least has an idea where you are.
#The blind do not have enhanced hearing or other senses. Sorry. They just learn to use what they have better.
#Curiosity is not a bad thing. Most people with disabilities know full well that they stick out, and that people with disabilities are rare for most people to ever meet. If you're curious, just ask. You may not get an answwer, but asking is never bad.
--Penta 00:11, 2 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Penta's rules of disability etiquette