Talk:List of UFO organizations

message: Representatives of The Israeli UFO Research Organization had tried creating an article about themselves a few times in the English and Hebrew Wikipedias and it was deleted every time with the expected explanation of "non-notable group". (Two times i was the deleting admin.)
I tried to be as fair as i could towards them and requested a list of sources that would prove notability. Their representative emailed me a list of links to some websites. Most of them are self-published and wouldn't cut WP:RS requirements. Some of them are interviews in Hebrew on rather popular programs on Israeli TV and radio; in my opinion, it is not something that proves notability, but maybe in the ufology world such things are considered notable.
One link, though, appeared potentially reliable: http://www.ufocasebook.com/2008c/euraconvention.html
Since i don't know almost anything about ufology, i ask for your assistance: is the website ufocasebook.com considered a reliable source in the ufology community? I see that it is linked from many UFO-related articles, so i presume that it is not complete garbage. Would that article be enough for having an article about that organization or at least a mentioning it in this list?
Thanks in advance for your assistance. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 21:37, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Israeli UFO Research Organization 

message: Could someone review www.tesacan.org - The Experiencer Support Association in Canada, and add them to this list for Canada? They investigate UFOs and put out reports annually. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:fea8:7cde:e360:c80c:79aa:497a:677d (talk • contribs) 19:56, December 10, 2020 (UTC)
:. The organization doesn't seem to be notable. If it's notable enough to merit its own Wikipedia article (and there isn't one at the moment) then it can be included in this list article. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:33, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Canada Representation

message: The Scientific Coalition For UAP Studies:
https://www.explorescu.org/
Notability:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/ufos-bipartisan/2021/05/31/096df812-be69-11eb-9c90-731aff7d9a0d_story.html
https://www.france24.com/en/americas/20210627-closer-encounters-how-ufos-became-a-target-of-us-defence-priorities-again
https://www.space.com/us-government-ufo-report-due-soon
https://www.kunc.org/news/2021-07-25/documents-indicate-how-little-officials-knew-about-mysterious-drones-last-year
https://www.wane.com/news/in-the-air-in-the-water-splitting-in-two-scientifically-investigating-the-aguadilla-ufo-incident/
https://www.wric.com/news/weird-news/what-flies-in-the-in-the-air-zips-through-the-ocean-and-splits-in-two-scientifically-investigating-the-aguadilla-ufo-incident/
Chantern15 (talk) 19:40, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: If nobody has an objection, I'll make this edit. Feel free to revert changes.Chantern15 (talk) 11:04, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed the inline external links per WP:NOTDIR. ~Anachronist (talk) 12:06, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

text: , This group is not notable as Wikipedia defines it. Sources that quote a member of the group do not establish notability - we would need independent, reliable sources that include substantial information about the group itself. MrOllie (talk) 12:47, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Such as?Chantern15 (talk) 12:58, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: , Please read WP:GNG, it is spelled out there. - MrOllie (talk) 13:02, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: So do I need to find independent books which mention the SCUAP and ICER?Chantern15 (talk) 13:17, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scientific Coalition For UAP Studies (USA) 

message: Apokrif (talk) 14:45, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should we add "non-governemental" to the title or remove "non-governmental" from the lead?