Talk:Private sector

message: I talked to my econ professor today and she suggested that an entire new page be made just for the United States of America up until about last year, since the bailouts have changed this in America. And then possibly other pages could created for different ways that it is conducted around the world.  Lothp (talk) 02:57, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Make a whole new page

message: Why is someone who cannot write an article based on basic standards of Wikipedia, contributing to such a critical page?  Much important subject matter and clear examples were removed without valid cause.  Look at the page history:Private sector  for proof.  Socalism has nothing to do with "Calypso music;" research the basic facts before making fundamental changes to critical articles.
THIS ARTICLE REPRESENTS A PROVINCIAL VIEWPOINT AND IS FAR FROM GLOBAL OR FAIR TO THE ENTIRE WORLD. NEEDS A REWRITE BY AN EXPERT
Please sign your comments. The point that Arthur Frayn was attempting to make is that your spelling is a bit hit-and-miss (made clear by the page history). The word you are looking for is Socialism, the word User Frayn was referring to is Soca, which is a type of Calypso. This article refers to a concept which does not need to be political - public and private (and even voluntary) sectors exist under all types of political regimes. The concept of a private sector is not in itself political. This is an encyclopaedia and not a forum for political debate or grand-standing, please keep your submissions factual and on topic and support all statements (particularly potentially contentious ones) with strong references.</br>
CaNNoNFoDDa 18:26, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reliable?

message: This article is currently well below Wikipedia's normal standards for such an important subject, and probably needs a total rewrite from scratch. -- Arthur Frayn 08:45, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite needed 

message: :Image:Pyat rublei 1997.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 11:33, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Pyat rublei 1997.jpg

message: I would really like a list of how big different countries private sectors are. Anyone up for the challenge?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.154.69.51 (talk) 16:48, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: List of private sector size in different countries

message: Pls explain it briefly. And add some pictures🌆🏜🌠 Aarya bharadhwaj. P (talk) 13:52, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request