lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:John 1

message: Are entries on individual chapters of a book encyclopedic?--Peter Kirby 02:52, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Individule Chapters

message: I'm not sure at all an article like this really belongs on Wikipedia, but if it is going to stay around any length of time, it needs to change. There are quite a number of respected Bible translations that do not convey the thought in 1:1 that the "Word was God", but instead that the Word was "divine", "godlike", "a god" etc. This will be a problem if the article remains. I assume any similar article will likely have issues much the same. --Oscillate 21:16, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: POV/Translation Issue

message: A Greek Speaking Church father, Philo,  "describes the Logos as the revealer of God symbolized in the Scripture (Gen. 31:13; 16:8; etc) by an angel of the Lord (Somn. 1.228-239; Cher. 1-3). The Logos is the first-born and the eldest and chief of the angels." Chokma (angel of Wisdom).128.227.198.52 (talk) 16:19, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Philo on Logos 

message: Are there any recognised translations of John's Gospel which use the title "Son of Humanity" in their translation of John 1:51? I've not found any examples, e.g. in the BibleGateway and BibleHub collections. I've only found one article which uses these words as a "different" translation, but Angela N. Parker, the article's author, does not cite this translation as being used anywhere.Parker, A., January 17, Epiphany 2B (John 1:43–51), The Christian Century, published 22 December 2020, accessed 27 July 2022 My suggestion would be not to include this term in the article unless it can be found in appropriate versions of the text. BobKilcoyne (talk) 04:33, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Son of Humanity 

message: Apologies if this issue has already been addressed, but this articles primarily sights the King James version, I'd like to note that this is probably not the best version to use, as the style of English used in this translation is not always particularly easy to understand, in addition to there also being a number of straight forward translation errors within the King James Version. I would suggest changing the translation used in this article to something more frequently sighted in academia such as the New Revised Standard Version (NRSV). Barabbus04 (talk) 12:59, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: "the style of English used in this translation is not always particularly easy to understand" The style of English in that translation is Early Modern English and its "grammar, lexicon and phonology" are not so different than currently used Standard English. The main article on the version has an entire section on its mistranslations, but they are apparenty more evident in the Old Testament section, due to the translators' poor understanding of the Hebrew language. They apparently had a much easier task in translating the New Testament from Greek. Dimadick (talk) 05:21, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of the King James Version
Talk:E/R

message: Wasn't this a partal spin-off of MASH? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.247.237.207 (talk • contribs) 12 August 2005
:I don't believe so. It's been awhile since I've seen an episode, but I used to watch it in syndication on Lifetime. Back then Lifetime was a medical/health channel, that started showing some doctor shows, hence it was called "Lifetime."--T. Anthony 03:11, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Although looking it up it apparently was always in part a woman's channel. Although what I remember most of the women's programming they showed before the 1990s was talk shows, a few old sitcoms, and women's health shows.--T. Anthony 03:23, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: As for the catchy song I can still remember much of it, but I think there are copyvio probs even in quoting songs from memory. Essentially it was shot and sung from the POV of a guy being wheeled in singing about having an emergency. You didn't see the guy seeing of course as you were "looking out through his", so to speak, at the cast. The idea was more the song was going on his head or something anyway as he was not in a position to sing. Anyway I kind of liked it in syndication, but it had a sort of "in syndication" feel. I barely remember it when it was on regular TV.--T. Anthony 03:23, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Invasion of the Dinosaurs

message: Some changes:
1) I've never heard of the Invasion of the Dinosaurs print being damaged.  It's supposedly out of focus on one side, but that isn't damage.
2) The idea that the Invasion of the Dinosaurs print was made for internal use only seems to be a fan myth.  Nothing at the End of the Lane 2 points out that the BBC archive cards list the episode as officially telerecorded, and that (according to Paul Vanezis), "it would have been necessary to book both a VT and film recording channel at the BBC to accomplish this.  Normally test film recordings would be made from live off-air material or using a Step Line-Up pattern".
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ken Arromdee (talk • contribs) 03:05, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some changes 

message: Although the external scenes for the Underground station were shot at Moorgate, in the story it is supposed to be Trafalgar Square, the Bakerloo line station later combined with the Northern line Strand station as the current Charing Cross station. The scripts at  and  clearly state the station is Trafalgar Square, and from the screen-grabs at  it can be seen that the studio-set of the interior featured a London Underground roundel with a name beginning "TRAF..." Furthermore, Trafalgar Square is at the end of Whitehall and so makes sense for the location of the bunker, while Moorgate is some two miles away. Nick Cooper 10:40, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm - Trafalgar Square disappeared from the tube map in what, 1979? Yet another hole in "the UNIT stories are set in the 1980s" theory! Timrollpickering 13:33, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, take that, "1980s supporters"! Deserves adding to the controversy article, at least. I'll do that. --khaosworks (talk • contribs) 13:41, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Underground Station 

message: Under "Missing episodes & Archive" there is a statement, "The surviving film recording of Episode 1 is the only telerecording of a Season 11 episode that exists." Another note says that Episode five exists in a colour print, and even though it's not b/w, how else would it have been made? But then, wasn't the intent to say that Episode 1 is the sole Season 11 episode that exists in ONLY that format, that it is the only one without a colour tape? --Ted Watson (talk) 18:49, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "...only telerecording of a Season 11 episode that exists."
Talk:Ancient Egyptian royal titulary

message: I would have liked to have added the hieroglyphic representation of all of Thutmose I's names/titles next to his example. Unfortunately this underlies the limitations of the Template talk:Hiero, which does not allow for all 5 titles to be displayed. 
And strictly speaking, it would also be instructive to be able to add the titles (such as the segde and the bee beside the cartouche, something else the Template talk:Hiero does not currently allow for. Captmondo 03:13, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: * Agreed that the serekh should be vertical. And when it comes to the Fivefold Titulary I believe the same applies top the Golden Horus name as well. Writing things horizontally is a limitation of the current system as implemented. After some further research it looks as though I will have to alter the 5Fold temnplate somewhat, since the "Two Ladies" and Golden Horus names are usually not rendered within a cartouche. And thanks for the addition to the Pepi II article btw! Captmondo 12:39, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: “Thereafter, the image of Horus always appeared alongside the name of the pharaoh.” Didn’t Akhnenaten dispense with worship of all Gods besides Aten?Rich (talk) 15:07, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Version October 3, 2020. It says Horus sign was always used thereafter. Even by [[Akhenaten]]?
Talk:Ethnopoetics

message: This entry places significant emphasis on the Linguistic usage of the term. It emerges in the 1970s in association with interdiscplinary journals drawing from literature and anthropology. This should be reflected.
---
The topic sentence limits the scope of ethnopoetics to a method of transcription. This is a conflation with what Rothenberg and others have more helpfully terms "total transation" (https://www.ubu.com/ethno/discourses/rothenberg_total.html).   The restriction of scope is inaccurate, although textual representation (transcription) of oral materials is an important element of ethnopoetic work, esp. for Tedlock; strictly speaking, even when Hymes attends to textual representation its not transcription he's involved in since usually working from mediating print (not oral) sources. 
I'd like to see a broader definition of "ethnopoetics" which includes transcription, translation, analysis/interpretation at least. Transmission seems to be central too, as in the reproduction or collection and circulation of stories, poems, songs, etc. 
See Alcheringa issue 1 statement of purpose: "- to provide a ground for experiments in the translation of tribal/oral; poetry & a forum to discuss the possibilities & problems of translation
from widely divergent cultures; - to encourage poets to participate actively in the translation of
tribal/oral poetry; - to encourage ethnologists & linguists to do work increasingly ignored
by academic publications in their fields, namely to present the tribal poetries as values in themselves rather than as ethnographic data" https://media.sas.upenn.edu/jacket2/pdf/reissues/alcheringa/Alcheringa_1-1_Fall-1970.pdf
Kwsherwood (talk) 03:03, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: ===========

message: My understanding is that Castaneda is a very controversial figure, and many people out there consider his career to be largely fraudulent, told in semi-fictional popular narratives to appeal to 1970s stoners.  Are there some scholars who take his claims seriously? - Smerdis of Tlön 19:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You are right. He is not notable for his contributions to scholarship. However I think his contribution to literatures about native americans have been influential enough to warrant a mention here even if they aren't uncontroversial. This article needs a very good work over - I will try to do it this coming week and I doubt anyhting of what's in it now will remain. Maunus 21:01, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Carlos Castaneda]] 

message: By the recent changes, the article has now become totally incoherent. Perhaps there should be some general section on ethnopoetic etymology, then one on general principles, and finally separate sections on Rothenberg, Tedlock and Hymes as they differ a bit on analytic detail.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.192.230.148 (talk) 08:31, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coherence
Talk:Oracle (comics)

message: *Marge Oracle and Batgirl are the sameperson
*One poorly spelled vote does not constitute a consensus. I vote keep them seperate. Gordon's Oracle is a different character then Barbara Gordon's as Batgirl. They just share an alter ego, just as Stephanie Brown's Robin and Spoiler are seperate. Gateman1997 21:07, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:PNC Bank Arts Center

message: I Made a new "non-copyright infringing" part on the page's temp subpage
Yuwen 03:34, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Delete I agree.  Only significant artists & performances related to the venue, like any live albums and videos recorded there, and the current mentions of Springsteen, Sinead O'Connor and Phish.  Milchama 00:21, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

text: Done.  Wasted Time R 11:55, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I removed this section from the page because it appears to constitute vanity:
:PNC Bank Arts Center charges every single ticketholder a $6.00 fee to park. Even if you car pool or take a bus, you have to pay the fee.
:The New Jersey Turnpike Authority owns the arts center. They hold up to 300 prime orchestra seats for each concert to sell to its friends, employees and other insiders. But it's not a secret, it's just not shared. Call (732) 750-5300 for the New Jersey Turnpike Authority and get in on one of the best-kept secrets in the state. Authority spokesman Joe Orlando said the authority hasn't kept the house seats a secret, but concedes it doesn't really tell people about them, either. Two hundred of the authority's seats are located in the orchestra and another 100 are in the first three rows of the loge section. The amphitheater has 7,500 seats and room for another 10,000 on the lawn.
:"You don't need to know someone in order to get tickets. We'll sell them to you as long as we have them," Orlando said
--Apollo1758 (talk) 16:30, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Ticketing and Parking section
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/JarlaxleArtemis 2/Proposed decision

message: If at all possible, can the following issues be clarified?
*How many arbitrators are needed to close this case
*How many arbitrators are recused
*How many arbitrators are inactive
*How many arbitrators are needed for a majority
*Why the temporary injunction, although clearly in place at the moment, is not indicated so on the front page or on the preliminary decision page
Thanks, Linuxbeak | Talk | Desk 18:50, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Some clarification requested

message: To the Arbitratiors as well as the accused:
On Sunday, September 18th, at roughly 03:10 GMT, I uncovered some extremely damning evidence against . It turns out that Jarlaxle has been the person behind accounts that dot the front page of Special:Listusers.
Developer  was kind enough ot cross reference a log file showing Jarlaxle's activities. You may find it at User:Linuxbeak/Admin stuff/JarlaxleArtemis.
As of right now, JarlaxleArtemis is now no longer allowed on Wikipedia. Thus, I move to close this Arbitration case due to special circumstances.
Linuxbeak | Talk | Desk 03:16, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  JarlaxleArtemis banned indefintely
Talk:Kelantan-Pattani Malay

message: I think it is Jawi, a system of writing in southeast Asian countries
it is not. See Malay language Tobias Conradi (Talk) 13:47, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I oppose the merge - this article is about the Yawi language, so it should properly have the title Yawi language, not Yawi. With the spelling Jawi, it seems to refer to the Jawi script. They should be two separate articles; all other language and script pairs are two articles. --Cbdorsett 10:06, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge?
Talk:Censer

message: Assuming it's not wikipolicy to list homonyms or whatever those are, I'll remove them?  Any objections or comments? Sherurcij 03:57, August 12, 2005 (UTC)
.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.16.175.100 (talk) 22:54, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Homonyms

message: Temple/ pre temple era?andycjp (talk) 04:02, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Jewish use

message: "In the Eastern Orthodox Church, the Oriental Orthodox Church, as well as the Eastern Catholic Churches, censers (Greek: thymiateria) are similar in design to the Western thurible. This fourth chain passes through a hole the hasp and slides in order to easily raise the lid."
There appears to be something wrong with the second sentence here, but being a non-native speaker, I lack the imagination to say precisely what. And which fourth chain anyway? 85.180.195.242 (talk) 12:58, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meaning? 

message: Hello,
I'm adding additional information to the Middle East section about incense burners.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mar Rosario (talk • contribs) 17:27, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Middle Eastern section
Talk:BTEX

message: VOH or VOC?  I've never seen VOH before.  Is this maybe different depending on your location?  :Piyrwq 03:58, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: An editor had changed it to "volatile organic hydrocarbons" at some point. It's a term, just not a terribly common one (Google test shows 446 hits). —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 13:22, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

message: We could merge either way, but BTX (chemistry) seems more common term.  But in any case, these articles discuss very similar content. --Smokefoot (talk) 14:33, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: How did you determine "common"? There are 11 interwiki language article links to BTEX, but only 1 other to BTX. +mt 01:50, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

text: Good point.  Ullmann's Encyclopedia, a vast collection of articles on chemical technology, has 21 chapters that mention BTX, but only 4 chapters that mention BTEX. A second argument is that BTEX can be mentioned in the BTX article with less confusion that forcing readers to juggle both (they are not really mutually exclusive).  Finally the BTEX article was not very good.  But I dont own things here of course, so alternative views are welcome. --Smokefoot (talk) 02:11, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Why not merge into BTX (chemistry)
Talk:Johnny Appleseed

message: It looks like you removed "American" as Chapman's nationality from the info box. Just wondering if there was some doubt as to his citizenship? Kthapelo (talk) 22:24, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: No, there is no doubt. We omit the nationality in the infobox when it can be reasonably determined from the person's country of birth. Even though we use the strange convention of listing British America as his birth country, it's obvious to the reader that Appleseed is American, so we don't list it in the infobox. Thrakkx (talk) 22:48, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thank you for the reply. I wasn't aware of the convention you mentioned and had gone off on a research tangent. I was trying to pin down primary documents about Chapman's birth; it turns out there are some incredible digitized documents like Chapman's name in the United States census in 1800. Kthapelo (talk) 06:01, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chapman's Nationality 

message: Due to several unproductive IP edits within the past few days, I have requested protection for this article. Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 21:23, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protection
Talk:Constituent (politics)

message: I eddited it, it should read "his" not her
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.228.149.69 (talk • contribs) 04:10, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit

message: Before I realized that the constituent country links in the relevant articles went to either the whole phrase or both the phrase and country, I figured that each word would be linked to its individual word, constituent and country. I searched for that, which is a dab page. Constituent country is certainly an element of politics, which is why a brief expalantion and link ought to be provided here. 
Also, while pork barrel politics is a redirect, it's apparently a common phrase which I was unaware. It makes the connection more obvious to the uninitated in See also if politics is appended to the end.  TransUtopian 11:28, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Constituent country
Talk:Guillermo Owen

message: I have searched on google.com but I have found no evidence supporting the bold claim that Owen is one of the "founding fathers" of Game Theory. I will let the article rest for a day and if there is no evidence to bolster that claim, I will VfD b/c otherwise Owen is not notable.  There are many university professors out there, many more notable, but Wikipedia is not an academic repository for all professors. I will attempt to message the author of the article. EDIT: no can do...the author has listed Owen in List of mathematicians and List of Colombians already, making me suspect vanity -- Bubbachuck 05:08, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Founding father?

message: Please accept my apologies. I did not want to sound rude or something. Also, I apologize for my ignorance: I have realized this biography is copyrighted (copyright laws in my country are not as sharp as in the U.S.). I am truly sorry. I would like to remove the original piece and write it again with my own words but on the web site there is a notice saying "Please do not edit this page for the moment". What should I do?
Thank you very much.
P.S. Perhaps you are right. This is the only biography of Dr. Owen in which I found he is a "founding father". If I can not come como across another reference that states the same, I will avoid such words and write only the facts.
: You may write it on a temporary subpage, linked from the original copyright notice.  Quote: If you want to work on this article meanwhile, write a new article at the temporary subpage, and indicate that you have done so on this page's talk page.  By the way I encourage you to create a Wikipedia account before you do so it will properly credited to your name. -- Bubbachuck 22:20, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Answer, again
Talk:Castilian lisp

message: Hi there. I think this page should probably be merged with ceceo. I'm not sure under which title the result should be, but I'm leaning towards ceceo. Regards & happy editing, Wile E. Heresiarch 05:09, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I've just copied most of the text to Ceceo. It seems to me that the phenomenon itself (and its historical origin) is more important than its legendary explanation. Unless anybody watching this has something to object, I think this article should be turned into a redirect now. --Pablo D. Flores 11:02, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  OK by me. Thanks for handling this. Wile E. Heresiarch 15:45, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Microsoft Defender Antivirus

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) echidnaLives - talk - edits 06:28, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Microsoft Defender →  – Since my last move request, I now too believe that 'Microsoft Defender Antivirus' would be a better name for the article, since that is its more common name. As it was historically a simple anti-spyware solution and has grown over time, I can imagine a layout in which the anti-virus/spyware component is the main focus of the article, with some information on the new Windows Security app being included somewhere in the middle (sort of like it is now).
However, I do not believe that the anti-virus component and the new multi-platform security solution can be fully written about in the same article without it becoming cluttered and confusing, which is why I still believe that this article should be renamed and the new multi-platform Microsoft Defender should receive its own article, even if that would only be small in size. Glukonian (talk) 10:40, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 30 November 2022 

message: According to Microsoft, AG for Edge for Business will be deprecated along with the Chrome and Firefox extensions. I added this information in the article, but should this feature now be moved to another section- History or similar? Beanut H Butter (talk) 23:31, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Defender Application Guard deprecation