Talk:Leapy Lee

message: He is listed in Whitburn as "Leapy Lee," not "Lee, Leapy." Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 19:39, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: No mention of his violent past here. Knifing of restaurant owner and subsequent imprisonment. 124.120.130.187 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 11:26, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see the thread immediately below. Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 17:01, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Violent Past

message: This removal is now the sixth by "a number" of editors. The material is all perfectly well-sourced, so what are the reasons, if any, why it should not be included? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 19:11, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: And we're now up to 7 with "User:Barry J Morgan" joining the throng. Martinevans123 (talk) 16:25, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I've semi-protected the article to prevent further disruption. --Michig (talk) 16:34, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. Martinevans123 (talk) 16:37, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia:Avoiding harm says... 
# Is the information already widely known? If it has appeared in numerous mainstream reliable sources over an extended period of time, then it is probably suitable to be included in the article. If the information has only appeared in a few tabloid sources, local newspapers, or websites of dubious quality, or has only been the subject of fleeting and temporary coverage, then it is not appropriate to include it.
# Is the information definitive and factual? Wikipedia is not in the business of speculation, or publishing dubious allegations, unless such allegations are notable in themselves. In particular, possibly false allegations that would significantly harm an individual's life should be avoided. Unconfirmed allegations may only be included in Wikipedia where they have already been widely publicised by the mainstream news media; in these cases, the allegations should not be given undue weight. In circumstances where a person has been charged with a crime, it is acceptable for Wikipedia to give details of the ongoing investigation and/or trial, but speculation must be avoided.
# Is the information given due weight in relation to the subject's notability? Biographies should not be dominated by a single event in the subject's life. In Ms. Bush's case, she is notable as the daughter of a serving head of state, and has received extensive media coverage not related to the underage drinking incident; as such, this incident should not dominate the article, and other events in her life should be appropriately covered. In cases where a person is only notable for their participation in a single event or phenomenon (such as the Bus uncle), it may be inappropriate to write a biography on them at all, as this may develop into a pseudo-biography or "coatrack" article. Instead, such content may be merged into a main article on the event.
If all of these apply, then it is reasonable for the information to be included. If none of them apply, then it should be removed. Theroadislong (talk) 16:47, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

text: There is more detail here. It was at the Red Lion pub in Sunningdale, and it was a stabbing not just a "brawl". More importantly Lee protested his innocence, saying he was "the fall guy" for Diana Dors. Should any more detail be added? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 17:01, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:   Arrest and imprisonment in 1970 

message: I removed this reference as I believe it breaches the UK Rehabilitation of Offenders Act as the offence is now spent and it is unlawful to publicise the matter. Barry J Morgan (talk) 16:32, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have a source to support your claim? Does an encyclopedia count as "publicity"? But this is quite an important question that bears on WP:BLPCRIME. Martinevans123 (talk) 16:38, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leapy Lee 

message: AllMusic here says both "Born Graham Pulleybank in Eastbourne, England, on July 2, 1939" and "Born: July 2, 1942 in Eastbourne, Sussex, England". (Also misspells his birth name).  Martinevans123 (talk) 08:11, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Note FreeBMD has 11 births named "Pulleyblank" for the years between 1937 and 1942. Two of these are for Eastbourne: one is Shirley G. registered June 1937 and one is Graham registered Sept 1939: . I'd suggest the latter is the one we need. Martinevans123 (talk) 08:25, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I've updated the FreeBMD entry above. But neither FreeBMD nor the actual registration record itself is considered WP:RS. Martinevans123 (talk) 18:18, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of birth