lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:If Japan Can... Why Can't We?

message: I think this whitepaper as a key catalyst should be seen separate from Deming, its also specifically referenced on Whitepaper as a famous whitepaper for the effect it had in and of itself.
I think further content on the creation of and distribution of the whitepaper is useful in itself apart from the specific discussions on W. Edwards Deming and his methods.
I believe therefore that this page should not be merged with W. Edwards Deming.
--Evolve2k 10:06, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

message: My college browser is having problems with WP:REFLINKS, could someone run it for me?--Launchballer 16:15, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Please post at Wikipedia:Village_pump_(technical), as this is definitely more of a technical issue. Primefac (talk) 16:54, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:REFLINKS]]
Talk:Auderghem

message: Between 23 December 2006 and 28 January 2007 there has been a survey about which names the articles for the municipalities in the Brussels region should have. The municipalities in question have different names in French and Dutch, the two official languages of the region. A majority of contributors to the survey prefers using one single same over using both names in the title. This single name should follow English usage, which has been determined using domain specific Google searches. 
The final result of the survey is that:
*for the following municipalities the French name has been chosen, in line with the most commonly used names in English:
**Auderghem 
**Forest, Belgium 
**Ixelles 
**Saint-Gilles, Belgium 
**Saint-Josse-ten-Noode 
**Schaerbeek 
**Uccle 
**Watermael-Boitsfort 
**Woluwe-Saint-Lambert 
**Woluwe-Saint-Pierre 
*for the following municipalities no significant preference in the English language has been found. After discussion, the Dutch names have been chosen:
**Sint-Jans-Molenbeek  
**Sint-Agatha-Berchem 
Details about the survey can be found at Talk:Brussels-Capital Region/NamingArchive3. Markussep 18:20, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Names survey, result

message: Sorry, nothing to do with any language preferences, but where the article name is already decided, this should be the 1st on the order of the 1st line. All respect to the Vlams name and history (I used to live happily in Zaventem), but it just looks illogical and wrong to have inconsistencies between the article name and Introduction. I think Talk:Brussels-Capital Region/NamingArchive3 applies here also. --83.170.113.250 (talk) 08:58, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: 1st line
Talk:Saint-Gilles, Belgium

message: Is Saint-Gilles really twinned with all the places listed? I can't find any references. Esch-sur-Alzette claims that it is twinned with such cities as Liège, Rotterdam, Cologne, Turin, Coimbra and Lille, so it seems unlikely that it would be twinned with a municipality such as Saint-Gilles which is just part of a larger city. --David Edgar 16:27, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Twinning

message: Sorry, nothing to do with any language preferences, but where the article name is already decided, this should be the 1st on the order of the 1st line. All respect to the Vlams name and history (I used to live happily in Zaventem), but it just looks illogical and wrong to have inconsistencies between the article name and Introduction. I think Talk:Brussels-Capital Region/NamingArchive3 applies here also. --83.170.113.250 (talk) 09:03, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: 1st line
Talk:Watermael-Boitsfort

message: Between 23 December 2006 and 28 January 2007 there has been a survey about which names the articles for the municipalities in the Brussels region should have. The municipalities in question have different names in French and Dutch, the two official languages of the region. A majority of contributors to the survey prefers using one single same over using both names in the title. This single name should follow English usage, which has been determined using domain specific Google searches. 
The final result of the survey is that:
*for the following municipalities the French name has been chosen, in line with the most commonly used names in English:
**Auderghem 
**Forest, Belgium 
**Ixelles 
**Saint-Gilles, Belgium 
**Saint-Josse-ten-Noode 
**Schaerbeek 
**Uccle 
**Watermael-Boitsfort 
**Woluwe-Saint-Lambert 
**Woluwe-Saint-Pierre 
*for the following municipalities no significant preference in the English language has been found. After discussion, the Dutch names have been chosen:
**Sint-Jans-Molenbeek  
**Sint-Agatha-Berchem 
Details about the survey can be found at Talk:Brussels-Capital Region/NamingArchive3. Markussep 18:36, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Names survey, result

message: Watermael = Where the water was "ge-mael-en". Maelen is old-flemish for "malen" as used in "malen van graan", meaning where the water gets churned is transferred from 1 recipient into another, referring to the several lakes in Watermaal where one feeds the other with fresh water from the source in the "Kweeperen park" = "Parc Tercoigne".
Maal heeft ook de betekenis van "rechtsplaats", place where justice was spoken.  So Watermael, refers to a place where justice was spoken, situated next to water.
Bosvoorde = Bos = Forest and Voorde = V-shaped hollow way due to charriots passing in a sloped road and the rain cutting it into a V-shaped road.  This old road can still be seen between the Parc Solvay and the Railway and ran/runs all the way along the church of Watermael.
Boitsfort = Boit = box but Bois = forest.  I don't know if the word Boits exists in french.  Fort = strong.  So "Strong Box".  Is it a sad example of the Frenchification of Brussels strategy?
Historical documents of the XIIIe century mention the name "Boitsfort". Boits = Boit + s.  "s" =  Son of or Sijn=Zijn=his. Boit = Boud = Boits. Fort, Germanic for domain with forests, lands and waters.  So the forest domain of Boud.  --SvenAERTS (talk) 20:13, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Origin of the name?

message: If ordering a taxi, say from Mechelen, would one say: to Watermaal or Bosvoorde?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:490:A600:8AE:846E:FC61:DAA (talk) 23:16, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  If it has a shortened name(?) is it Bosvoorde or Watermaaal?
Talk:Electrolytic cell

message: Under "Galvanic cells compared to electrolytic cells" it says that "a galvanic cell must use dissimilar metals" but this is not true. A galvanic cell could also use the same metal but with different ion concentrations in solution, or maybe even with only a difference in the solution medium (ionic strength, complexing agents, etc.)
:The point is that the galvanic reaction is caused by different electronegativities of the metals to the ionic solutions, using the same metal limits the usefulness of the difference in electronegativity, there is more info on the galvanic cell article and if you wanted to raise this point on that talk page it would be more appropriate there.Jonathan888 (talk) 18:34, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Galvanic cells compared to electrolytic cells 

message: I don't mean to seem rude but in terms of comparing it to pages such as the galvatronic cell it's not as flash... does anybody agree?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.237.58.235 (talk) 07:49, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should this be labelled a stub? 

message: I reviewed this entire article and tweaked it where needed. I don't see essential edits needed so I removed the copy edit tag.Coaster92 (talk) 05:54, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy edit tag 

message: The "Cells" section is off topic because it is not about electrolytic cells but about other types of electrochemical cells. It could therefore appear in a "see also" template at the top of the artcile. Thomaszwilling (talk) 19:01, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cells section is off topic 

message: I thought the third sentence could be more clear and made what I felt were minor changes. EEguy100 (talk) 22:06, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarifying Third Sentence
Talk:Khamoshi (1970 film)

message: There is a war scene in this movie but there is no indication that it is the Sino-Indian war of 1962 (given the release date, it could even be the Indo-Pak war of 1965). Besides Waheeda Rehman is not in that scene and she does not tell Rajesh Khanna about the experience. The line is removed.
82abhilash (talk) 03:25, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Wanli Emperor

message: What on earth is the deal with translating "Emperor" in the posthumous name and nothing else?  We should give the full Chinese posthumous name, and then give the English translation. john k (talk) 22:26, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What?  No listing of a myriad of spellings for this guy's name?  No use in this English version of Wikipedia of alphabet characters that don't exist in the English alphabet?  You're just going to leave it at Wanli?  How very, very un-Wiki-like.  Where's the controversy, where's the drama, the recondite references?  For shame!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.111.87.104 (talk) 18:53, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation of posthumous name 

message: Most of the material seems to be covered in Mote's Imperial China: 900-1800, so I will try to insert some inline citations. I'm also trying to get the 7th volume of Cambridge History of China, which might have material that doesn't agree with the Yale "party line."Shandong44 (talk) 20:00, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Inline citations
Talk:Us and Us Only

message: The fact that states that this track is unavailable outside the Japanese version of the CD is not correct. I checked the American version on my personal copy of the album and the track listing on amazon.com. It appears that the song is available on the Charlatans UK version of the CD so this fact may need to be cited or changed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.171.147.42 (talk) 12:28, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good Witch Bad Witch 3
Category talk:Organization stubs

message: Minor question: Why don't :Category:Automotive organization stubs, :Category:Trade union stubs and :Category:Charitable organization stubs show up as subcategories in :Category:Organization stubs? --Singkong2005 11:28, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I see it's fixed (thanks). --Singkong2005 talk 05:30, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Subcategories 

message: Should we create a terrorist organization stub or just include it into criminal organizations??? --Francisco Valverde 17:54, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terrorist organizations
Talk:George Romanes

message: The text is about "coined the term" (probably "neo-Darwinism") hence this article should be split into a bio and the coined term.
:No, disagree. The article is about much more than the coining of a term. But if the article gets longer, a separation into 'Life' and 'Work' would follow naturally.  Macdonald-ross (talk) 17:58, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It is actually doubtful whether Romanes eventually embraced Christianity again. His posthumous papers are not entirely clear on the matter. Historiographical sources other than McGrew's may be referred to.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Movinwes (talk • contribs) 14:45, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Romanes and Religion 

message: The text is inconsistent in telling us what professional positions he held, when.  In the Accomplishments section it mentioned that he was a Professor at the University of Edinburgh.  Professor of what?  Then it mentions that he established a lecture series later, when he was a Professor at Cambridge University.  It never actually mentions his becoming that.  And again, Professor of what?  Music?  I think that he deserves better than this.   Felsenst (talk) 21:50, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  His positions
Talk:Timok (disambiguation)

message: I don't think this should be a disambiguation page - nobody calls the valley and region around the river "Timok" (In Serbian, the river is Timok and the region is Timočka Krajina). A note about the valley could be put on top of the article on the river, but nothing more. Disambiguating isn't needed and only requires further dab of pages that use Timok now.  → Тодор Божинов / Todor Bozhinov → Talk 11:36, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I mean the region is named after the river - just like there's Pleven Province named after the town of Pleven. If there was amgibuity in some article, it should have been made clear, not redirected to a disambiguation page. What do you think, isn't the river the primary meaning after all? My opinion is that the river should stay as Timok and all other meanings should be on Timok (disamgibuation).  → Тодор Божинов / Todor Bozhinov → Talk 08:39, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why disambiguate?
Talk:Link Capacity Adjustment Scheme

message: How does the Network Manager track the recent changes made by LCAS to add circuits to the VCG?
Are these circuits pre-provisioned for the LCAS to add to a VCG or are they provisioned when LCAS performs an "ADD" operation?
:They are pre-provisioned for the VCG: the LCAS protocol runs over the circuit itself, hence it cannot be used to establish the circuit. It only deals with changing the bandwidth of a VCG, not with assigning resources to the VCG. This is similar to LCP in Multi-link PPP or LACP in Ethernet Link Aggregation. BertK 11:49, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Feudal society

message: Why is this separate from Feudalism, which ought to discuss the society that evolved under feudal concepts, as part and parcel of an encyclopedic treatment of its subject?  And should do a better job than is being done here, frankly. I'd suggest a merge, but there are only rememberings of potted school text here so far. "Feudal society" is a natural section heading at Feudalism.--Wetman 07:01, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, the Feudalism page is much better and this article doesn't cite any sources except for one 1930s book and even then it doesn't cite the source properly. I'm going to add a cite source tag and even a proposed merge/deletion. Master z0b 05:45, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Carpathian Romani language

message: The page Bohemian Romani doesn't pretend it is a dialect of Carpathian Romany... Belgian man 12:36, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, success! Belgian man 15:55, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

message: Upon looking at the list of dialects at this article and the North Central Romani one, I noticed that they're pretty much the same. We don't need two articles about the same subject, so which one should be merged into which? --Khoikhoi 21:02, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge?
Talk:Georgius Agricola

message: For the English-language version, shouldn't 'Georg_Agricola' redirect to 'Georgius_Agricola'? Right now this is the other way 'round. (Encyclopædia Britannica uses "Georgius").
Kevin Pfeiffer 212.99.207.136 17:37, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect backwards? 

message: I am looking for a good woodcut to illustrate fluorine.  Ideally addition of fluorite as a flux to smelting (hard for me to understand all his diagrams with all the letters and such, so there may be such an animal).  if not that, anyting else with fluorspar in it.TCO (Reviews needed) 06:51, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  looking for a good woodcut to illustrate fluorite  

message: This article is of poor quality:  it is written like a novel.  We read that the subject "...also devoted himself to...".  It is difficult to see how one can be "devoted" to one thing and "also" to something else.  There are uncited explicit quotations e.g. "to fill in the gaps in the art of healing".   There are hyperbole which are out-of-place in an encyclopaedia e.g. "...woodcuts which illustrate every conceivable process...", when it is clear that many relevant processes have been conceived since his death.  There is poetry which is similarly out-of-place e.g. "...the town to which he had added such lustre" and "...he was not suffered to end his days in peace".  There is mixed British and American spelling:  there should be one or the other.  The subject deserves better.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mike Shepherd (talk • contribs) 16:36, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi  thank you for the feedback on the language: feel free to attempt the copy edits and clarification that you suggest would improve it. Wikipedia only gets better if you Be Bold!!!! and make changes when you feel they are appropriate, Sadads (talk) 14:55, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poor quality 

message: It seems unlikely that Maurice of Saxony was the one who appointed Agricola the court historiographer of Saxony, as Maurice was 9 yrs old in 1530. It must have been either his uncle George or his father Henry, right? Leaving this note here in case someone else has time to look into it.
Iconofiler (talk) 03:19, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Factual errors
Talk:Dot crawl

message: "It results from intermodulation or crosstalk between chrominance and luminance components of the signal, which are imperfectly multiplexed in the frequency domain."  <<<In English?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.210.4.213 (talk) 12:55, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Translation: The analog TV signal is historically a black-and-white signal. The preferred form for transmitting an analog video signal is to send the three signals for red, green and blue seperately. This is how it's done in a VGA cable. But for compatibility reasons, and to save bandwith, the TV engineers decided to keep the old black-and-white norms, and to encode the color as dot crawl. For PAL and NTNC, this means: The intensity of the pattern encodes the saturation, and the shape of the pattern encodes the hue. There are differnt ways to remove the dot crawl from the luminance information, after the color has been decoded: the easiest way is to simply blur the image. This is how very old color TVs did it. The most advanced way is to use a comb filter. It uses the dot crawl from the last image and adds it to the dot crawl of this image. As the phase of the pattern moves between two images, it will eliminate this way, if the color has not changed since. Most TVs however work this way: they decode the color information, blur it al little, and reencode it as a negative pattern. This eliminates most of the pattern, but not at sharp edges where the color changes. -- Sloyment (talk) 07:36, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

text: In SECAM, color bleeding looks awful (just google for “SECAM fire” or “SECAM flares”). It results in bright red and blue bars. As this has to be prevented, the luminance signal has to be reduced in bandwith (i.e. blurred) on the sender side. So the receiver can do the same to remove the dot crawl. Without removal, the dot crawl would be all over the picture at constant intensity. -- Sloyment (talk) 07:36, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: What?

message: "Dot crawl is most visible when the chrominance is transmitted with a high bandwidth, so that its spectrum reaches well into the band of frequencies used by the luminance signal in the composite video signal. This causes high-frequency chrominance detail at color transitions to be interpreted as luminance detail" -- nope, it's the other way around (high-bandwidth luminance is indistinguishable from chrominance in a composite video signal).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.137.243.218 (talk) 19:47, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: ...and so there are two visible crosstalk effects: chroma into luma and luma into chroma. Both are correctly described in the article. Cuddlyable3 (talk) 20:39, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confused 

message: Dot crawl is sometimes referred to as "hanging dot".  For instance, the TI TP5154 video decoder provides a comb filter to reduce/remove "hanging dots at color boundaries. Jsarao (talk) 16:56, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternate Terms
Talk:Johnny Temple

message: I'm pretty sure there's a blues singer named Johnny Temple too... I don't know anything about him, but another article and a disambiguation page might be in order here. I'll see what I can find out about the singer. Guypersonson 13:13, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Cool, someone made the page! Johnny Temple (musician)Guypersonson (talk) 21:26, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Paul Jarwarski

message: Is the Paul Jarworski, in the Detroit robbery link the same person as Paul Jarwarski from Cleveland? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.117.137.20 (talk • contribs) 
I believe so.  I think the articles should be merged, and it should be under Paul Jaworski.  Any objections? Pustelnik (talk) 14:48, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Detroit robbery
Talk:Rio Grande (Paraná River tributary)

message: This redirect is wrong since the name of the river in Portuguese is Grande, with Rio being added to designate what it is. It is not known as Rio, Rio Grande. In English it has to be called Grande River. Vogensen 13:18, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I moved to Grande River, to conform with the other Brazilian river articles. Regards, Carioca 18:38, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect
Talk:Common wheat

message: Somehow the more minor wheat species were getting pages ahead of this. Have made a start; will return after doing some more work on the main wheat page. I can add more on evolution and early history. Any cereal scientists who can add more on food properties? 
I'll also add a paragraph on transgenic wheat - an interesting story, with Monsanto withdrawing their products.
Mark Nesbitt 13:19, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Started page

message: I don't know enough to add to this, but it would be nice if "recent history" didn't imply that North America is the only place worth talking about.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.9.158.196 (talk) 10:07, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: it would be nice

message: http://scholar.google.com/scholar?as_q=Triticum+aestivum+cultivar+nomenclature&num=10&btnG=Search+Scholar&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_occt=title&as_sauthors=&as_publication=&as_ylo=&as_yhi=&as_allsubj=all&hl=en&lr=&newwindow=1
--222.64.16.233 (talk) 23:42, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed the added section "Nomenclature and taxonomy of the variety and its cultivars; Further information: Taxonomy of wheat; This section requires expansion." as it does not add any information to this article. The heading is also confusing - common wheat is usually regarded as a species or subspecies, not variety. And the link to Taxonomy of wheat is irrelevant as that article just deals with species level classification. I agree it would be useful to have a section on cultivar and landrace classification, but that's a complex subject... Mark Nesbitt (talk) 07:08, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  a topic of the cultivar nomenclature has been added based on the following.... 

message: http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&lr=&newwindow=1&q=allintitle%3A+Triticum+aestivum+cultivars&btnG=Search
--222.64.219.42 (talk) 06:01, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  More cultivar info.... 

message: what level of extinction risk does t.aestivum face? is it least concern?103.28.246.224 (talk) 07:14, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  IUCN extinction status
Talk:Kevin Nicholls

message: No way is Nico 6 ft 2 inc!!
:Listed at 5'10" on the official club page Bob Palin 19:02, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Height

message: I know nothing about Kevin Nicholls, but some of the allegations here seem positively libellous, and should probably be removed. Bill Tegner 23:05, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Libel? 
Talk:Gul Mohammed

message: Wow.  Thats a lot of weight for such a small body.  I didnt weigh that much until I was over 3 feet tall. <FONT COLOR="#800000"><B>Soap</B></FONT> Talk/Contributions 00:12, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That makes a BMI of 52... Much but possible...--77.128.63.140 (talk) 22:40, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think a BMI means anything in this case because his body has far different proportions from that of most people.  For example, he head and torso make up a larger proportion of his body.Eiad77 (talk) 10:34, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  37 pounds???  