Talk:Thomas Muster

message: Maybe mention should be made of his dreadful record at Wimbledon compared to the other slams. At the time it was close to a standing joke in Britain that he'd be "injured" (the newspapers strongly hinted that at least some were "convenient" injuries) just before Wimbledon. But how many other world number ones can there have been without a single victory in one of the grand slam events? 81.158.1.233 (talk) 15:36, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I remember much debate in the newspapers at the time as to how he can achieve World No1 with his poor Wimbledon record.  I've just added the following - "He remains the only World No.1 singles player of the Open Era who has never won a match at Wimbledon."  I suppose this happened pre-Open Era at some point given the difficulties of travelling the world several decades ago, but it is expected nowadays that players of any significance win at least one match at each Grand Slam at some point in their careers.  I don't know if Muster is alone in doing this, so please correct my text if you have better info than I do. Niki2006 (talk) 15:08, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: After a quick Google search it appears he was not happy after being seeded so low in 1996http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/muster-angry-over-wimbledon-seeding-1337717.html (he was world #2 in the rankings but was demoted to #7 seed. I guess he didn't want to come back to Wimbledon after that. 189.223.101.170 (talk) 04:32, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wimbledon 

message: Just asking why the change from Super 9 to Master Series was undone? Listed as Master Series on table and in other places here on page. Alonsornunez (talk) 21:16, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistency re;Super 9, Master Series 

message: in his results:
20. 4 October 1993 Palermo Clay  Kim Jong-Il (DPK) 7–6, 7–5 
Surley this is a farce?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.152.91.19 (talk) 21:01, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, he met with Bruguera. But it was pretty funny. 83.252.242.5 (talk) 23:55, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccuracy 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Thomas Muster. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111125000305/http://www.addictiveentertainment.com.au/celebrities.htm to http://www.addictiveentertainment.com.au/celebrities.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141210011930/http://www.austriantimes.at/news/Sports/2010-04-26/22805/Tennis_hero_Muster_marries_again to http://www.austriantimes.at/news/Sports/2010-04-26/22805/Tennis_hero_Muster_marries_again
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111125000305/http://www.addictiveentertainment.com.au/celebrities.htm to http://www.addictiveentertainment.com.au/celebrities.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:02, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Dear Editors,
I would like to draw your attention to a factual error on the page of Thomas Muster https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Muster. In the 3rd row of the first paragraph it is written: "Muster is one of only three players to win Masters titles on the three different surfaces of clay, carpet, and hard court." This statement shows controversy due to the fact has been listed on another wikipedia site of the Tennis Masters Series records and statistics (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tennis_Masters_Series_records_and_statistics). On that site you can find an chart of "Winners of the series tournaments on the three surfaces" where more than 3 players are mentioned as winner on 3 different surfaces. It would be highly recommended to implement any specific distinction e.g. Tennis Masters/ATP Masters or after 1990 or something like these. Leaving unchanged the current chart, it would mean 4 players won (and not 3) Masters on 3 different players.
Sincerely yours,
Mrandrew16  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrandrew16 (talk • contribs) 18:09, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error at "winning Masters on 3 different surfaces