Talk:Jerry Siegel

message: how did being a jew afect his life  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.173.143.199 (talk) 18:39, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  ? and answer if u know the answer then answer it and if u have a ? then ask it 

message: More sources for the recent decision:
*Warner vexed by legal Man of Steel, Variety, March 30, 2008
*Copyright Lawyer talks Siegel Decision, Comic Book Resources, March 31, 2008
*Judge Says Siegels Now Own Half of Superman, Comic Book Resources, March 28, 2008
I thought it better to put them here so the editors working on this page can decide which they want. (Emperor (talk) 00:09, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject.  If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class.  The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject.  Comics-awb (talk) 16:47, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Comics B-Class Assesment required

message: BTW, I remember from my childhood that in the Siegel & Shuster byeline (which I took to be a convention, or courtesy to the series creators; it may have been more precise than I knew), he was sometimes Jerome as well as sometimes Jerry.  That I remember correctly is proved by the fact that I have never seen his full first name since, until I read this article.
Rogersansom (talk) 17:03, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Jerome/Jerry

message: How could he be inducted POSTHUMOUSLY into the Halls of fame in 1992 and 1993 if he didn't die until 1996? Williamgeorgefraser 11:59, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure what the text said when this was first brought up, but looking at the current article it is somewhat confusing, but the "posthumously" applies specifically to Shuster. I'm not sure how to phrase it to make it clearer, though.--Khajidha (talk) 19:11, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Induction into Halls of Fame

message: This article did not satisfy my curiosity about where Superman was born.  Did Jerry Siegel spend his entire productive life n Cleveland, Ohio, or did he move to New York at some time?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.225.197.81 (talk) 06:11, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where? 

message: How did Jerry Siegel die?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by CDH31211811 (talk • contribs) 02:07, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  How did he die? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Jerry Siegel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090203141111/http://classic.newsarama.com:80/DC/Superman/Intro.htm to http://classic.newsarama.com//DC/Superman/Intro.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:40, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I have asked that an SPI be opened regarding User:JungLiao, whose pattern of editing and whose sudden appearance on Sept. 1, days after BaronBifford was blocked, suggests that BaronBifford was returned.--Tenebrae (talk) 15:03, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Another BaronBifford sockpuppet?

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jerry Siegel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070103234000/http://www.dcindexes.com/database/creator-details.php?creatorid=18 to http://www.dcindexes.com/database/creator-details.php?creatorid=18
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:31, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Now that I have gone through the incredible number of edits made by User:Kurzon over the past several days, addressing primarily uncited claims, POV conclusions and non-encyclopedic WP:TONE, as well as minor MOS issues and — again as last year — his desire to put two spaces after sentences, which we don't do. With these very specific edits reverted, I ask that Kurzon not revert back nd edit-war but, per WP:BRD, bring his concerns to this talk page.
Also, though I have not the time to work on this now, prose is preferred to mid-prose lists, and stub sections should be merged under larger organizational points.--Tenebrae (talk) 21:19, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Today's edits

message: I don't understand why you don't trust Lauren Agostino's book.  It's self-published.  So what?  It's not like most publishers subject their books to peer review. Kurzon (talk) 18:14, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: We've already had one admin say that this WP:SPS is non-RS. And you're defiantly trying to include it again. Do we need to bring him back into this discussion? The book isn't available anymore; it's been withdrawn from Amazon. That is not a reliable source.--Tenebrae (talk) 20:07, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

text: I quote from Talk:Superman ownership disputes: "The book is self-published and should not be considered reliable: According to his LinkedIn account, Agostino, co-author of the book, is CEO of Holmes & Watson Publishing, the publisher (which, as far as I can tell, only ever published this one book). Huon (talk) 22:34, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

text: And incidentally, I find it remarkably disingenuous that you would say "I don't understand why you don't trust Lauren Agostino's book" when you read Huon's statement same as I. Do not take me or admins for fools. --Tenebrae (talk) 20:14, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Me being an admin doesn't give me any greater clout than other editors in disputes about the reliability of sources. That said, I stand by my comments in the previous discussion about the book: It's self-published, not subject to any editorial oversight (and contrary to what Kurzon says, reputable publishers do have an editorial staff that reviews manuscripts submitted for publication), not a reliable source. It shouldn't be used. Huon (talk) 22:16, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thank you for responding, and I didn't mean to give a misimpression. I should have specified that I mentioned you were an admin solely to note that Kurtzon's behavior upon his return from a year's block has been noted by an admin, and that repeatedly using a non-WP:RS source is not the kind of thing admins, who can block him again, look upon kindly. Again, thank you for stepping in.--Tenebrae (talk) 22:27, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

text: If I were to contact Agostino and have her send me scans of the letters to Siegel and Shuster that cite those figures, would you accept that as evidence? Kurzon (talk) 22:23, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: That would be OR, and in addition, without any other historian whatsoever verifying these purported letters, there is no way to know they're real and not fakes. Unknown Siegel and Shuster letters suddenly materializing after 80 years and not attracting the attention of the press and comics historians? I'm not so sure. --Tenebrae (talk) 22:27, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Agostino

message: Unfortunately I don't know the details, but it seems strange there is not even a mention of his working for British Comics such as Lion in the 60's.  This is referenced in the article on The Spider but not even mentioned here.
I don't feel qualified to update the article, and felt a note here was the best I could do. Dhericean (talk) 08:55, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Work in British Comics 

message: The figures related to his selling the rights to Superman come from a 10-year-old source. We may want to update them to a more recent equivalancy.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:39, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The inflation template automatically adjusts the figures to the latest available year for which data is available. Kurzon (talk) 10:47, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  We may need to up-date the current equivalency of some figures