lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Buys Ballot's law

message: William C. Refield is not my specialty, but he is very connected to the historical legacy I specialize in. I was very excited when I wrote to you last night - all the way to misspelling his name. It has here been corrected. i am sure we can work something out that reflects the entire story. Thank you.James 'Jimbo' Daily (talk) 16:33, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Getting the Right Name Correctly

message: Why is there not the first mention of William C. Redfield and Dove? Redmond began his work studying storms in this way for some 25-30 years on exactly all this before HE DIED IN THE YEAR THAT DUTCH GUYS AND FERREL ARE CLAIMING THIS SCIENCE AS THIER OWN "LAW"?!?!. Please excuse me if I am more than shocked at all this??? Other parts of the world had their contributions in all this - but absolutely nothing like Redfield - who was experienced at reaching out to the Policy Sector. In this case - TO THE GREAT RECOGNITION OF THE INSURANCE AGENCIES OF LONDON AND BEYOND!!! Redmond - also an Invention of Steam ship effectiveness and safety - also the major voice in the world presaging and birthing actual policy just ahead of the Steam Locomotive Revolution. This was a name most certainly known to both ferrell and Coffin as Redfield was the first President of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. AAAS Founded by Joseph Henry of the Smithsonian - WHO COFFIN WORKED FOR PRODUCING the 1854 Smithsonian Book: "The Winds of the Northern Hemisphere". Also the 1856 Book "The Elastic Force of Aqueous Vapors" which was produced by the SMITHSONIAN! Yes! - they both darn well knew of Redfield and Dove - and Joseph Henry and many at the Smithsonian knew that they knew!!! 
   Now.... if there is a Law written by the 'co-opters' and you want to report they named their own law - then you can report that.... But can you please consider a broader background of where this Science comes from - the immensly likeable gentlemen - William C Redfield???
  If I gather my facts on this [already have authored a bio article on Redmond] then you can expect some additions to your article to appear some night. We'll take it from there. Thank you.James 'Jimbo' Daily (talk) 08:22, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Background Extremely Needed

message: The picture is a bit confusing as the article talks about having your back to the wind and the picture facing the wind. Unusual Cheese 12:15, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, and addressed. 14 May 2008 at 1159 PM.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.82.196.212 (talk) 03:59, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Might be clearer to redraw it as seen from above. --McGeddon (talk) 13:01, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture
Talk:Soma (Brave New World)

message: Can someone substantiate with a quotation that soma is "a combination of morphia and cocaine in tablet form"? IIRC the chemical composition of the drug was not described although its effects (narcotic/tranquilizer) were. Ellsworth 23:03, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

message: I have always heard that Huxley's soma comes from the Greek word soma, meaning "dead body", as the drug makes the person as a dead body.  Any insights?75.2.97.75 06:21, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology 

message: I just took out the word fictional when it is used to describe the psychedelic mushrooms in the book.  While Huxley never gives a clear description of what kind of mushroom in it,  whenever someone says hallucinogenic mushrooms the psilocybe genus comes to mind.  And there is no reason to believe, especially when Will takes the mushrooms,  that they are not psilocybes. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 76.167.145.176 (talk) 21:03, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Psychedelic Mushrooms
Wikipedia talk:Bad links/http4

message: Removed the following completed edits:
* Qinghai ->  Http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Tibet
* QI ->  Http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/B000BHZ1FG/qid=1130442443/sr=8-1/ref=pd_ka_1/026-9200574-6078006
* QSIT ->  Image:<img_src="http://www.fda.gov/ora/inspect_ref/igs/qsit/images/qsitlogo.gif">
* Qtsaver ->  Http://demoz.com/_Demoz
* Quake_engine ->  Http://qwpython.sourceforge.net/_QuakeWorld_Python
* Quantitative_history ->  Http://www.vstat.net
* Quantum_Link_Reloaded ->  Image:http://www.petscii.com/qlink/images/reloaded.png
* Quantum_teleportation ->  Http://www.spacedaily.com/news/physics-04zi.html
* Quantum_virtual_machine ->  Http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/divincenzo95twobit.html_Two-bit_gates_are_universal_for_quantum_computation Http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9601029_Multiple_Particle_Interference_and_Quantum_Error_Correction
* Queen-_Live_On_Fire_at_the_Bowl ->  Http://www.bbc.co.uk/music/classicpop/reviews/queen_onfire.shtml_BBC
* Quincy,_Florida ->  Http://www.census.gov/popest/cities/tables/SUB-EST2004-04-12.xls__1
* QUISCI_(cipher) ->  Http://www.quisci.de_QUISCI
Epolk 23:08, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:John Myung

message: The 'related acts' mention the Liquid Tension Experiment project, but Myung is not there. so i'm removing it.
User:jchahin13 17:01, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Next time don't bother discussing it. --ProgressiveAeternus (talk) 09:55, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  LTE 

message: I watched DT in the "Chaos in Motion" tour and he was using the MusicMan Bongo 5 HS. He only switched to the RBX-JM2, from what I could tell, in songs that needed the higher string (like Overture 1928).
JVale 01:38, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  'New' equipment 

message: Someone vandalised this page. I fixed it. But I didn't get a promo photo. 54UV1K 18:24, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: Dream theater is NOT a christian band, therefore Myung is not a "Category:Performers of Christian music."
so i got rid of that faggotry24.139.30.154 22:26, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  :rolleyes: 

message: John Myung didn't play on Age Of Impact. He only played on the second Explorers Club album, Raising The Mammoth. 142.177.158.177 (talk) 16:02, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Age Of Impact

message: According to the reference provided, he is the 15th greatest bassist of all time.  Think the wording should be changed to "one of the greatest bassists of all time". 153.120.208.58 (talk) 23:49, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: "Greatest bassist of all time"
Category talk:Revolutions

message: Digital Revolution does not conform to the definition of revolution at the top of the page. Should it be included as a valid revolution? --Dumbo1 23:14, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: digital

message: In a similar way to the "digital" section above the article 'Industrial Revolution' does not fit in the definition of 'Revolution'.  This is causing the oddity of a painting of a violent political revolution on as the lead picture of Industrial Revolution instead of the far more meaningful steam engine. Mtpaley (talk) 23:04, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Industrial Revolution
Talk:Lorenzo Mascheroni

message: Lorenzo Mascheroni (May 13, 1750 - July 14, 1800) was an Italian mathematician, born near Bergamo, Italy.
At first mainly interested in the humanities (poetry and Greek language), he eventually became professor of mathematics at Pavia.
In his Geometria del Compasso (Pavia, 1797), he proved that any geometrical construction which can be done with ruler and compasses, can also be done with compasses alone. However, the priority for this result (now known as the Mohr-Mascheroni theorem) belongs to the Dane Georg Mohr, who published a proof already in 1672.
In his Adnotationes ad calculum integrale Euleri (1790) he published a calculation of what is now known as the Euler-Mascheroni constant.
He died in Paris.
----
:Why is the article repeated on the Talk page?  (Also, 2 small fixes.) Jmacwiki (talk) 05:46, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Repetition?
Talk:Rajk College for Advanced Studies

message: I wonder if it's a problem that the text of this article is a copy of this page, with some basic grammatical conversions. Adam78 23:22, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  
Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day

message: What's with the "one day"? Confusion. Couldn't this helpful page just be called Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up? --SergeWoodzing (talk) 08:36, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @SergeWoodzing, this has always struck me as awkward as well. I support removing the words "one day", "Wikipedia is not for things made up" is sufficient. Netherzone (talk) 15:09, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:   I tried to rename this but only managed to move the talk page. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 14:41, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It doesn't appear anything has currently been moved. PICKLEDICAE🥒  15:22, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The talk page move, understandably, was reverted. The help needed here is to move the page to Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia is not for things made up (with the talk page following) as it does not seem possible for a regular user to even start a move request. Please do not remove the help request unless that problem is addressed. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 15:28, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  already told you we need consensus. This isn't what the help template is for. Stop using it. PICKLEDICAE🥒  15:35, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see Favonian on this page. I don't see where I didn't want consensus ("start a move request"). I don't see why you removed the help tag - twice! - without addressing the issue. I do see two admin's who like "one day". That flabbergasts me to no end, and i give up.  --SergeWoodzing (talk) 13:34, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

text: Hint: other days. Oh, well, I give up. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 13:29, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Late to the party, but "one day" is much better. Doug Weller talk 07:13, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Also enjoy the whimsy of "one day" it really captures that feeling of making stuff up. Andre🚐 21:02, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: "One day"?

message: Could someone maybe explain to me what is meant here by postmodern debate: “Verifiability isn't up for postmodern debate; it's a standard criterion.”? Thanks in advance!   Gzhegozh talk 08:13, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm guessing it's a boogieman use of the word  to mean relativism or sophistry or whatever -- "what is verifiability  anyway?" and such. MY CHEMICAL ROMANCE IS REAL EMO!discuss real emo here... 08:16, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meaning of “postmodern debate”
Talk:Automatic seat belts

message: This section pretty blatantly doesn't cite any sources, just thought I'd tag it first before I erased it. 69.221.114.153 (talk) 20:05, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: WRONG! That is such an overused, baseless argument that we already have a specific thing about it: WP:INTERESTING. Since the delete-section tag has been up for over a week, since no one has fixed or contributed anything to that section, since no one seems to care, and since the section appears to all be original research; I'm deleting it. Mr. P. S. Phillips (talk) 21:16, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delete section 

message: This short article ought to be merged into Seat belt. Automatic seat belts were used only very briefly, and almost entirely in just one country; there is little basis for meaningful expansion of this article's content, but when integrated into Seat belt, the subject of automatic belts can be presented in better historical and technical context and detail. —Scheinwerfermann T·C21:36, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge & Redirect

message: I've removed the Globalize template. This article focuses on automatic seat belts in America, because that's the only market where they were used. Internationalisation would consist of a one-line statement to that effect. Besides, this article really ought to be merged into Seat belt. —Scheinwerfermann T·C16:37, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The article does not really make it clear at all that these were only issued in the US. --Zilog Jones (talk) 15:49, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Globalize template
Talk:Mab (moon)

message: Main text says it may have a diameter as large as 24km if it's as dark as Belinda and Puck... sidebar says 24km *radius* (so 48km diameter?) ... also sidebar suggests a minimum of 5km "radius", whilst the text says a brighter albedo could provide the same imagery from a smaller body but doesn't give any figures. So do we think it would actually be a 10km diameter, or 5km (and 2.5km radius)?
Please, everyone, it's not that difficult. Pick one or the other and get it right, as there's a 2x difference between them. Right now it's not at all clear which one is meant, and it's pointless having the data listed on WP because if someone wants the correct figures they're going to have to go research them elsewhere anyway.
And if you can't handle such fundamental mathematical and geometric terminology, stay away from editing materials relating to outer space, because this is the sort of confusion that eventually leads to planetary rovers being turned into metal pancakes.
(Oh, and if the radiameterus is so poorly defined, what is the point of stating a surface area or volume? Given the total variability between the smallest and largest possible figures for that, the SA could be almost 95x different and volume almost 900x different from min to max, far too big a range to be worth making any kind of estimate for; possibly a min-max might be worth stating, or even just a max, but not a set figure with a ~ at the start of it.)
((...on that note, the mass here is given as 1.0 x 10^15 ... on the main list of Uranian satellites, it's 0.01 x 10^18, which works out to 10 x 10^15. So even there, we have a 10x discrepancy even in just two closely hyperlinked parts of the wiki. Do we actually know enough about any of Mab's vital statistics for there to be any value in writing it down at the moment? How were the density, mass, gravity/escape velocity figures generated?))
209.93.141.17 (talk) 23:29, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Radius vs Diameter... AGAIN
Talk:FOIL (programming language)

message: C'est plus bon que l'autre articles.
--69.119.100.238 00:04, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I just find it a bit odd to have two completely separate languages on the same page simply because of their names. We could simply have a "Not to be confused with" marker at the top and split it into different articles about each version.
Emirps (talk) 15:38, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should this article be split into two articles?
Talk:Operation Ke

message: This section appears too large, considering that there is a link to the main article. Binksternet (talk) 17:15, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I shortened it. Cla68 (talk) 21:27, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guadalcanal Campaign heading 

message: Why designated Operation Ke? For Guad? Or something else?  TREKphiler hit me ♠  02:01, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It appears to simply be a randomly selected character  from Kana syllabary.  I didn't see anywhere in any of the sources any mention that it might mean anything more than that. Cla68 (talk) 02:34, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

text: According to the Japanese article it's derived from kendo chourai, which means (roughly) "coming in force to roll up the earth." Brutannica (talk) 16:13, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

text: Jisho.org gives a translation of 捲土重来 (kendochōrai) as "recouping one's strength for a renewed attack​" or "making another attempt with redoubled efforts.​" Perhaps adding a line to the beginning of the article like "The  in  comes from the yojijukugo ." would be worth putting in. Katachresis (talk) 20:00, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: If supported by a reliable source that could be useful, perhaps as an explanatory footnote.  Kablammo (talk) 18:41, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I have searched for references to the derivation of Ke from  and, besides Japanese Wikipedia, I have found two websites that mention this derivation. (Japanese Wikipedia mentions that there was another Operation Ke from  for an operation in the Aleutian islands.) The websites that mention this derivation are http://連合艦隊ww2.jp/kantaisen14b.htm and http://yukishin.thyme.jp/kendochorai.html.  I have not found any sources in English that mention this. I am unfamiliar if a foreign language reference would be considered reliable. Katachresis (talk) 00:22, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ke pasa?

message: Pretty sure this is a typo (Japanese destroyer Suzukaze) - can anyone confirm ? - TB (talk) 19:19, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it should be Suzukaze. Cla68 (talk) 22:53, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Japanese destroyer Suzumaze]]
Template talk:StargateTopics

message: OK, something ODD is definitely going on... First off, I didn't remove the link to Known Wraith when I was doing my color changes...yet it shows that I did...  then, User:Dpark changed the colors to be more uniform, and I edited the template to put back the Known Wraith link...but it shows that when I put back the link it said I'd deleted (but hadn't), it says now that I changed the colors back to what I had before Dpark changed them, which I didn't!  ?!  Tomertalk 00:11, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I think Wikipedia has been having some edit issues lately.  I editted another template for color a few minutes ago, and then it told me I had an edit conflict. . . with myself.  Of course, it's also possible that you accidentally editted a previous version which had your colors.  I wouldn't worry too much about it unlses you notice other "mishaps" creeping in. -- Dpark 00:19, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Colors

message: There is an active debate on template standardisation going on the Stargate Wikiproject page. -b 19:20, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template Standardisation 

message: i think this template needs serious work.
does it currently summarise the "Topics in Stargate"? no. it doesnt even point to the main articles pertaining to the series. any outsider who went through this template would find nothing by LISTS OF NAMES. the funny thing is, this template doesnt even have a link to stargate (device), which i would say is one of the most important topics in stargate!
i think we need to rework this majorly. the top row is good. the second row less so, the third abysmal. "personnel in atlantis" is hardly the thing we want as a "top level topic".
ultimately we need a few things already linked to on other templates, but i dont think the doublelinking is going to be bad. there are some MAIN AREAS of stargate simply MISSING from this "topics in SG" template!
things needed on this template:
*main races
**Goa'uld
**Ori (Stargate)
**Wraith (Stargate)
**Ancient (Stargate) / Four Great Races
*main tech
**Stargate (device)
**zat
**ring transporter
**daedalus (stargate)
*People in stargate:
**sg-1
***Daniel Jackson
***Samantha Carter
***Jack O'Neill
***Teal'c
**atlantis
***Elizabeth Weir
***John Shephard
***Rodney McKay
***Teyla Emmagen
not needed:
*NID
*LISTS like Known Wraith (links to these lists should be in ARTICLES)
-- Alfakim --  talk  17:48, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  major changes 

message: I don't think these are a big enough threat, ever, or certainly anymore, and they are already encompassed by The Trust (or the other way around). I say choose either to have a link to the trust or NID, not both. -- Alfakim --  talk  13:48, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  NID
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Calendars/Poll2

message: # First off, when you buy a calendar every year to hang in your kitchen, is it ISO-Compliant? No. Does the weekday start on Monday? No. Also, the Chineese Calendar is still the same as it was before, so changing the coloured square on the Chineese Calendar had becoming so confusing, I have given up! --Munchkinguy 02:48, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Sunday

message: #Given that the Gregorian Calendar is sponsored by a Christian Pope, Monday is the first day of the week.  Keeps things in agreement with the concept that "God created the world...and on the seventh day he rested"; Sunday traditionally being that day of rest. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.131.207.26 (talk • contribs) .
:All things considered, the tradition of observing the day of rest on Saturday outdates that of observing it on Sunday..See Sabbath adaptation. WesleyPinkham 05:04, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Monday
Talk:The Dome at America's Center

message: how much does it cost to rent out the stadium for one day?
:How much do you have?    General Ization Talk    21:12, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is St. Louis able to host the Super Bowl? Is 66,000 enough? -Amit
Ford Field did it with 65,000, so yeah I don't see why not. I guess they just haven't tried/been lucky enough... Ypsidan (talk) 03:26, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Super Bowl

message: I have just noticed this logo...which may be better or worse than the present one in the Infobox...what do you think?.Seth Whales (talk) 18:48, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo
Talk:Hexokinase

message: Tito4000, i agree that Mg2+ is essential for the reaction, but you should have not mentioned it because then to keep it fair we have to mention it in ALL articles about enzymes, classical and signaling, that use ATP. In every biochemistry textbook hexokinase is the first enzyme that is discussed, as glycolysis is always the first pathway in the "metabolism" part of the book. So mention it there in such way makes sence, but here on Wikipedia - no. Also Mg2+ is not a cofactor - cofactors by definition are the non-protein part of the enzymes, as you probably know cofactors are either prostetic groups - tightly bonded (most of the time covalently), and coenzymes - loosly. Regardless of that they all share one thing in common - they all undergo chemical transformation during the reaction, i'm trying to think about an exeption but i can't recall, while Mg2+ does not - it just "shields" the negative charges of ATP as to allow an easier access to the ATP's γ phosphate by the attacking nucleophil group of the phosphorylated compound, which is -CH2-OH of Glc in our case. Boris 00:25, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: User:TimVickers produced the following image which I nominated for deletion last week because it wasn't being used anywhere.  User:Deryck Chan was nice enough to look through my nominations at my request and thought that this one was worth saving, and might be useful on this article. ~ BigrTex 16:47, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible image 

message: The source used at the end of the hydropathy analysis section and its associated link don't seem to work. I'm unsure if the claim made is supported and believe it could use updated to show the claim is true. DSchlink15 (talk) 03:07, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I deleted the whole section and the hydropathy plot along with it.  It was WP:OR as the cited reference did not back up the statement being made (or even mention hexokinase).  It also just isn't a significant enough matter to warrant its own section of the article.  WeridNAnnoyed  — Preceding undated comment added 02:36, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hydropathy plot