Talk:List of edible seeds

message: Dear editors of this page: I think this list deserves to be featured, so I nominated it to FLC. Please express your opinion on the comments page. hike395 06:39, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I withdraw the page from consideration: we'll work on the page more and submit it another time hike395 02:57, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Featured List

message: No list should have a misc section. There are specific guidelines for being on any particular Wikipedia list. Either these items should be in an existing heading, should have a new heading, or should be removed. JohnnyMrNinja 08:25, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misc. 

message: Shouldn't this article list Flax Seed??? unreg'd user  08:38 13 Dec 2007  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.244.112.17 (talk) 14:39, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Omission? 

message: The use of the word 'important' in the second and fifth sentences of the second paragraph, could imply either 'substantial use' or 'nutritional value' (of seeds as a food source). In both cases, it comes close to opionion rather than fact, and is potentially misleading, so it would be improved by verification and clarification. I don't have the background to edit this to a more appropriate wording.
Kaplunkiigirl (talk) 09:58, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction - use of 'important' 

message: Lupinus
82.31.66.207 (talk) 11:57, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lupin 

message: Poppy seed is not on the list. So, it is not edible, or what? Whatever the reason is, it should be clarified. Sesame is also included, and I have never seen it eaten other than in breads like this []. 82.141.94.229 (talk) 05:06, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  poppy seed 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of edible seeds. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111204153025/http://www.globalchange.umich.edu/globalchange2/current/lectures/food_supply/food.htm to http://www.globalchange.umich.edu/globalchange2/current/lectures/food_supply/food.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:19, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: It seems to me that tables are appropriate for some of these lists, particularly legumes and cereals, as their botanical taxonomy is important, but are tables appropriate for the polyphylic groups, like nuts and pseudocereals? I'm not sure. Input is welcome. Michipedian (talk) 00:18, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, like that, or like the current nuts table. I just don't know if the botanical background is relevant like it is to cereals and legumes. It seems like overkill. Michipedian (talk) 03:26, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I suspect you are right (that it is overkill). —hike395 (talk) 10:40, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  Cool. I restored the nuts list. I'm now just wondering about the pseudocereal list. The amaranth family is significant and important, but the rest of the seeds don't really need their botanical information explained. It's a short table though so should be fine. I think it looks good with the pictures. Any thoughts? What about individual pictures for all of the seeds? Michipedian (talk) 00:46, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Appropriate use of tables