lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Anglo American Platinum

message: Added Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation bit as it sounds very controversial.
Check out - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SLAPP for info on Anglo Platinum
This doesn't sound like an advert to me --Zachblume 20:32, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: === annual what? ===
"accounting for about 38% of the world's annual [what?]". 
—DIV (138.194.11.244 (talk) 06:00, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammar 

message: "accounting for about 38% of the world's annual [what?]". 
—DIV (138.194.11.244 (talk) 06:00, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  annual ''what''? 

message: Hi, 
                
I noticed that this article contains a number of factual errors. Full disclosure: I work in Anglo American's communications team.
Lonmin isn’t a subsidiary of Anglo Platinum, as is stated throughout this article. Anglo Platinum doesn’t own Lonmin or operate the mine.
Following Wikipedia guidelines, I don’t want to make the edit myself (as I’m affiliated with Anglo American), but wanted to point out the factual error to the community. If someone could correct the article that would be great.
Thanks,
Richard731 (talk) 09:30, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. The removed content can be restored if reliable sources can be provided. Celuici (talk) 10:04, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Factual errors
Talk:Donal Graeme

message: Spoiler Warning: This question refers to a spoiler you've already been warned about in the main article.
I'm interested in the source for the claim on this page that has Donal Graeme somehow becoming Hal Mayne.  This is certainly the impression I got from reading the series, but I don't remember it ever being explicitly stated.
:In "The Final Encyclopedia", when Hal goes to Dorsai the second time (when Amanda meets him at the spaceport), after they sleep together, he tells her "I was Donal" and later "I am Donal". In a 700-page paperback edition, this comes at pp.546/554. In between, he discusses the reasons and the perceived outcome of each attempt. - Tenebris 66.11.165.101 (talk) 10:52, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Prometheus the Fire-Bringer

message: I've edited and expanded this article. Footnotes are, as yet, beyond my feeble talents, but I'm working on it. Since the entries on the first two plays are under their English title, I'm going to retitle this article accordingly. Ifnkovhg 05:27, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits and expansion 

message: Props to whoever brought this article as far as it is right now. That can't have been easy. Having said that, and knowing that this is probably a lot to ask: Could we please get some more references on this article? The bulk is very sketchy without any references. -- 2ReinreB2 (talk) 04:30, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  More sources, please
Talk:San Gervasio (Maya site)

message: Howdy,
I am brand new at this wiki thing, but I ran across the article on San Gervasion (an area I have specialized in since the early 1970s) and I noticed a few mistakes that I would like to correct.  I would also like to take the opportunity to add more information about the site along with footnotes regarding source material.  I noticed that no one has posted anything on this talk page since 2008.  Perhaps there is no one out there following the talk section of this article, but I thought I'd try to reach out before I attempt to post any revisions. If anyone is out there, please let me know, and I will be happy to discuss my ideas for revisions before I apply them. Wizardofcoz (talk) 00:23, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Porth yr Ogof

message: Yay, my first article. Let's see how spectacularly it crashes.
Anybody else been to this here cave?Lady BlahDeBlah 20:52, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: First article

message: Photos coming soon peeps, got a lovely map of PyO lined up too...just as soon as I get my BLOODY SCANNER WORKIN'!!!--Lady BlahDeBlah 12:09, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Right, me again...I;m off to Caving UK to see if I can get some free ones, but I still REEEEALLY want to use the map diagram, at least. I've seen the formal tone of address notice, so I'm going to slap down what's in the cave and what they are. Or what I think/what the book says they are.
Wormhole/Gun Barrel - Phreatic tubes, the latter larger but tapering to a tight squeeze.
Sammy the Sea Snail, the White Horse - calcite fossil.
Hywel's Grotto - a long crawlway to reach a nice set of calcite formations and stalagtites/mites.
The Creek and therefore Death/Suicide Ledge - .phreatic tubeways developed upon bedding planes'.
Letter Box - rectangular passageway width of a man's hand.
Rat Trap - a duck, a small passageway nearly full with water.
And the 'Citation Needed' part...well, uh, that's what was in the book...he says nothing more on it.Lady BlahDeBlah 12:54, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures and Formal business
Talk:John Stearns

message: For the Football attitude section, I used various corroborating blogs, etc. as sources but I don't like using blogs for sources.  If anyone has easier access to old NY newspapers than I do, please add references for those.  In the meantime, I'll try to find a library that might have them.  Thanks!  —Wknight94 (talk) 21:07, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  References for the hard-playing examples 
Talk:Alfred Deller

message: "Despite his experience directing the consort, Deller's conducting of chamber orchestras attracted some adverse comment regarding technique."  The (anonymous) source cited in support of this assertion is inadequate, as far as I'm concerned. 98.115.255.240 (talk) 04:55, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  the critique from Gramophone is snobbish
Talk:Highways in Spain

message: "The first they are generally of concession and with toll, whereas the second they are gratuitous and they are maintained by Government." - I'll try to improve that but what does "of concession" mean ?  -- Beardo 21:12, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: concession

message: There is a link "AP-9" that is about pistol.  There is a link "AP-9 Sur de Caldas de Rei", too. Do they mean the same road? 
Tatrgel 12:25, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: AP-9

message: The satellite maps of Ibiza show road markings equal to the E10 and E20 of the International E-road network going through Ibiza Town. Can someone explain what these roads are? __meco 19:06, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Every Spanish Comunidad and province has it's own prefix (like B for Barcelona and C for Catalonia), so the E on Ibiza represents Eivissa. That's Catalan for Ibiza. So it has nothing to do with the E-numbers.  Chriszwolle (talk) 11:47, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: OK. It puzzled me to see those signs which looked like the European E-numbers. __meco (talk) 12:02, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: E10 and E20 on Ibiza

message: The Spanish page of this article states that there are now 14.325 kilometers of autopistas and autovías, which seems plausible to me. Are there any sources to this, so we can incorporate it into the article? Chriszwolle (talk) 11:49, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Network Length 

message: I think someone should make an independent article talking about the road system in Spain, not just motorways.
Albertocsc (talk) 14:50, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Done, by moving it up to Transport in Spain#Road transport. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 13:09, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roads in Spain redirects here? 

message: Can someone please write a little about the history of this roads. Maybe there was some sort of national program ect...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by RonRodex (talk • contribs) 00:12, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  History of motorways 

message: The German autobahns articles mentions that the Autobahns are the fourth largest highway system in the world, behind the US, China, and Spain, with no mention of Canada... so what's up with that? Which is the fourth, Spain or Germany?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by WolfgangAzureus (talk • contribs) 01:15, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  About the Autobahn 

message: The article doesn't mention anything about why the different colours exist. Is it some sort of artefact, or is it to tell the difference between roads? Can someone add that in? Jordf32123 (talk) 06:24, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: There it goes the colour code in a new section. Ambil (talk) 10:23, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why different colours?
Template talk:Wikipedia principles

message: Created per discussion at Wikipedia talk:Simplified Ruleset#Guidelines Box Template, and above. --Quiddity 21:19, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

message: The template links to the Principles page which, as a newcomer, I unfortunately find rather confusing and not providing much insight. I have left a more verbose description of my concerns on the corresponding talk page. Depending on the appropriate course of action, the link should be removed or replaced. I appreciate any feedback or guidance on how to proceed.
CSMProject (talk) 16:12, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Links to confusing "Principles" page
Talk:Brackley

message: The latter half of the "Future" section seems to be very slightly biased in the respect that it seems to be expressing opinion as opposed to the pure facts  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.96.103.199 (talk) 21:38, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias 
Talk:Uma Pemmaraju

message: She used to have stary or startled eyes. Now they look normal. Did she have eye surgery ? Did she change her eye cosmetics?Lestrade (talk) 14:29, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Eyes
Talk:Liber Pontificalis

message: Seems like a well-done article so I'm not quite sure where to put this or how to format it, but we need to include a list of the major recensions of the work, particularly the "Felician Catalog" (Catalogus Felicianus) that's the earliest known version of the Saint Lucius story. Sources for article expansion here, here, and here. — LlywelynII 16:31, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Recensions
Talk:Intermodulation distortion

message: That info was just added and I made a new header for it. I'm not sure though, is it IMD in particular or just distortion in general that's relevant in music engineering? --Howdybob 21:44, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: IMD in music

message: Thank you for adding the header! I'm amazed by this site, a newbie for sure. This is a very debated topic in the music production, specifically audio engineering, community. Ever since the industry shifted to mostly digital audio recording technologies, engineers have been finding ways to "warm up" and "color" cold sounding digital audio. It seems that IMD is the technical term for these warm characteristics. Harmonic distortion is multi-dimensional in that it affects every element in a signal and also the crosstalk between the two stereo channels. If done with skill, the stereo image takes on a three dimensional personality that is much more appealing and life-like than straight digital mixing techniques. This site is awesome.
--- jason | sterly 19:25, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: IMD in music
Talk:Svalbard Airport

message: Why was this article moved? The name of the airport is Svalbard Airport, Longyear, per Avinor offical site. In case the mover though that Longyear was a form of disambiguation, it is not the case, since this naming method is the way all airports are named in Norway (City Airport, Location). Arsenikk (talk) 12:55, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:List of papal conclaves

message: No reason only post-1800 conclaves are notable. This list should be aspirational. Savidan 22:03, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If this list is going to move into table form eventually, I recommend not only the pope's name, but also the location of the conclave, the number of cardinal electors, and the number of absentee cardinals. Details such as length, outsider interference (e.g. veto's), etc. should be considered but I am at present uncertain. Savidan 01:56, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:Alessio Tramello

message: The problem wasn't the quality level, its the use of the word "considered".  You're putting forth an opinion and attributing it to a faceless person/group of people. A proper citation for this might be a book, or documentary or some other piece of reputable published material that makes this claim regarding this person's work. The reader needs to know just who it is that considers their work to be of this level, or in this case reflective of a certain style.--Crossmr 21:50, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Citation
Talk:TV Offal

message: There a comment in the article about their replaying of old adverts that says; "and an advert for the now discontinued Diocalm which now seems extremely racist."
Here's a link to that sketch below, it does not seem racist at all, the only thing he says is "Holidays abroad? Never again" there's no singled out race, name calling or anything like that simply the generic mention of "Abroad", maybe a little bigoted but not directly racist.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3JEm0q_GzVE
I think this line should be removed or changed as saying it is a POV issue that may be pandering to unwarranted sensibilities and could cause the reader to assume this is true without seeing the clip. 
Let me know what you think Danno81 (talk) 09:44, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV? 

message: There were 2 different assassination attempts on him (in 1974 and 1979) - he survived the first but not the second. The article should specify which one was shown in the series (the 1974 one if he survived like it says he did). Or at least state that each one shown in the series was an attempt in a particular year etc - again to make clear that the ultimate assassination outcome then stated by Smith only related to the particular one shown.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr gobrien (talk • contribs) 14:47, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assassination Of The Week : Park Chung-hee
Talk:HMS Aboukir (1900)

message: This article has no citations for its very unkind comments about what were in their day very powerful ships.  It is not in the least bit neutral.--Toddy1 19:25, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm glad somebody has respect for these ships! Unfortunately, shipbuilding and naval practice saw rapid advances in the early 1900s leading up to the Great War, and these ships were quite outdated by the time they were sunk - all three in nine minutes as they didn't have destroyer escort at the time. Sad but true. I've removed the tag for now; please review the sources I left right after the article mentions the Live Bait Squadron. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Edwin Herdman (talk • contribs) 11:18, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: POV

message: This page deals mostly with the 7th Cruiser Squadron) and the Action of 22 September 1914, both of which have their own pages now. I'm  proposing to re-write the service history section so it's principally about Aboukir (not that there's a lot to say, unfortunately.) Opinions? Xyl 54 (talk) 17:39, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: this is always a problem: you can't really have an article describing the history of a ship without describing how it came to be sunk, especially if that is most of what is generally considered important about it. At  minimum there would have to be a short description of the sinkings here and a 'see also'. But since the description is relatively short anyway, what needs cutting? Just add a see also anyway? I dont see a service history section? Sandpiper (talk) 10:50, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've been bold and changed this; I've made a "Service history" and "Fate" section, and cut out the detail already at the "Squadron..." and "Action..." pages. If that isn't OK, let me know. Xyl 54 (talk) 16:03, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  re-write?
Talk:HMS A3

message: I edited this page to include a link to the associated National Heritage List for England (NHLE) record on behalf of Historic England who are responsible for the management of wrecks designated under the Protection of Wrecks Act 1973. The NHLE record includes further information related to the wreck. Phoebe MSDS (talk) 08:16, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent Edits

message: Per WP:CITEVAR
Generally considered helpful
The following are standard practice:
* improving existing citations by adding missing information, ... added year
* ...
* imposing one style on an article with inconsistent citation styles ... added sfn template
*...
* making citations added by other editors match the existing style (if any). Do not revert someone else's contribution merely because the citation style doesn't match. If you know how to fix it, then fix it.
Feel free to remove ALL SFNs. That would make the references more consistent. User-duck (talk) 20:33, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redid edit to update SFN ref.
Talk:Pope Adeodatus II

message: The description of Adeodatus's potificate seems contradictory: "Adeodatus was active ... in the repression of Monothelitism ...," followed later by, "Adeodatus II did not get involved in political events and disengaged himself from the events at the time surrounding Monothelitism."  Is this supposed to be that he was active in the repression before his election, but not afterward? Kelseymh (talk) 05:51, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Activity against monothelitism?
Talk:Pope Adeodatus I

message: This is from the verson 15:03, 17 March 2013‎ Str1977
"In August 618, an earthquake struck Rome, followed by an outbreak of a scab disease, during which Adeodatus died."
OtterDW (talk) 02:59, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is 'Scab Disease?'
Talk:HMS A7

message: I am a direct decendent of Charles Russell who died on the A7 and am interested in contacting the decendents of the other crew members.--Dominic Russell (talk) 13:32, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Decendent of crew member 
Talk:HMS A1

message: Weren't A-boats sold to IJN, making them the first subs in Japanese service?  Trekphiler (talk) 22:53, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ignore my ignorance...  Trekphiler (talk) 22:55, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: For sale by owner

message: Note that Mary F. Romig, Fatal Submarine Accidents, 1900-1965 gives the date of sinking as 19 April 1904. 2fort5r (talk) 08:07, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of Loss

message: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-hampshire-27223756
©Geni (talk) 05:10, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible source

message: I edited this page to include a link to the associated National Heritage List for England (NHLE) record on behalf of Historic England who are responsible for the management of wrecks designated under the Protection of Wrecks Act 1973. The NHLE record includes further information related to the wreck. Also included were links to virtual and/or physical dive trails associated with this wreck. Phoebe MSDS (talk) 15:08, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent updates

message: Really? The first one was invented in 1912. And I don’t think the autopilot would have been able to detect rocks back then. 2A04:4A43:50AF:D2F2:94F:D776:97FC:CCB7 (talk) 04:29, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  On autopilot in 1911?
Talk:Pope Adrian I

message: Article gives the year of death as 795, but the Anglo-Saxon chronicle reports his death in 794. --174.55.175.192 (talk) 11:38, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

message: I think the article would benefit from creating sections within the biography, to walk us through his life and major achievements and eras. Eliz81(talk)(contribs) 14:44, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sections 

message: I thought he was known as Pope Hardian I. Only Pope Hadrian VI (or Pope Adrian VI) got the name option?--Gepid (talk) 11:53, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adrian or Hadrian?
Talk:Pope Adrian II

message: The article makes an un-cited claim that "It was not, at this time, forbidden for Catholic priests to marry". This contradicts the (cited) claims given in Clerical Celibacy in the catholic church. I suggest either a citation be added or this claim be removed from the article. 74.71.50.163 (talk) 15:18, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Family
Talk:HMS Achates (H12)

message: Listing awards received by the crewmen of this ship is too much detail for the encyclopedia that is Wiki, unless the men receiving the awards are notable because they've received the Victoria Cross or similar top-level medal.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:25, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Awards

message: HMS Westcott page mentions two French submarines were engaged by Achates and Westcott.It claims both were destroyed by the two ships.Does anyone have access to a reliable source documenting this engagement?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonathan Fenny (talk • contribs) 17:34, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: It's cited in this article, although it was the same submarine that was attacked by both ships.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:48, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Operation Torch Submarine attack
Talk:HMS Agamemnon (1781)

message: Considero en el el artículo el buque de guerra británico HMS Agammenon, se omite referir que la presencia de dicho barco en costas de Maldonado - Uruguay, se debe a las denominadas Invasiones Inglesas del Río de la Plata (1806-1809).
Primera derrota de la Gran Bretaña por fuerzas sudamericanas.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.2.45.106 (talk) 18:12, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Well the region was still under Spanish colonial rule at that time, but yes Agamemnon was indeed part of that operation (made irrelevant anyway by France's invasion of Spain, bringing Spain into the Alliance). I have some information on this and will add it when I get a chance. Martocticvs (talk) 22:18, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  agammenon ship 1781
Talk:HMS Agamemnon (1879)

message: "..firing along the line of the keel produced unacceptable blast damage to the superstructure, so that in reality the turrets could only fire on beam arcs". ??? I am guessing that this might mean that it could only fire directly to the sides, but this seems to imply that the ship was designed by a moron. Such stuff needs to be spelt out unambiguously for the novice. The whole point of an encyclopedia is to make serious stuff accessible to a general audience. Rcbutcher (talk) 13:43, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Please explain
Talk:HMS Agamemnon (1852)

message: It is debateable whether the Agamemnon was a unique ship.  She is sometimes described as being part of the James Watt class.  In terms of her wooden hull, she was.  However her boilers were aft of her main mast, whereas in the James Watt class the boilers were forward of the mainmast.  This was a significant difference in the distribution of weight, and caused the Agamemnon to steer badly except when she was carrying a lot of stores forward.--Toddy1 (talk) 04:43, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Was the ''Agamemnon'' a unique ship?