Talk:Pirates of the Burning Sea

message: Added a german speaking fansite and created a new link section (other languages)
Airow 13:08, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes made 

message: I've removed the Guilds section, I don't think advertising guilds is appropriate for Wikipedia (no other MMORPG articles that I checked listed guilds), and it was attracting non-NPOV listings, I'd also previously cut the article down to basically a summary. Detailed info (eg what I've written below) probably isn't needed until closer to the game's release (when we might actually know some more concrete details) Mako 02:59, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it would also be a good idea to mention the User Content system which is one of the defining characteristics of this mmorpg.  --Wormywyrm 10:50, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

text: I was thinking the same thing. Removed. 82.95.254.30 18:26, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improving this Article... 

message: The last two sections read as advertisements. Especially the first one.--Cloak' 19:36, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertisement 

message: I've tried my best at a rewrite. Some sections are still obviously missing, but so be it. Sebastian Krog, Denmark 11:34, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite 

message: Added references reganding releasedates, spec requirements and the SOE publishing deal. I removed the 'more references' tag because the rest of the info is, as stated by the 'future release' tag, not nececarilly reliable. If if references to the devlogs were given (which is a good idea for future updates), the information would still not be fully reliable. Sebastian Krog, Denmark 15:31, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: Please stop adding IRC channels as if they are official resources. The only official IRC channel for PotBS in on irc.coldfront.net 84.139.108.54 13:31, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chat channel 

message: This section doesn't seem very relevant.  There's no mention of it anywhere on the official forums, the official site, etc.  If it really is that covert I don't think it rises to the level of significance needed for a wiki article.  Dremac 22:56, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Secret Societies? 

message: The MMO Delta Green is not on indefinite hold just on hold correction made. Martinj63 22:00, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Further correction is needed.  One, Delta Green is a TITLE and should be properly formatted.  Two, the link to the "game of the same name" links to the article on the setting for the Call of Cthulhu RPG, not an RPG titled Delta Green.  Is the MMO actually based on the CoC setting?  Or is there an RPG titled Delta Green that is the basis for the held MMO?  The text is unclear, and as this is an ENCYCLOPEDIA, you should be accurate not vague. 71.200.134.47 (talk) 13:43, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor correction 

message: Does anyone know if there is a monthly fee for this game like other MMO's?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.10.220.189 (talk) 20:17, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: $15 a month, I believe.--Cloak' (talk) 01:33, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Correct.  Basic fee is $15 per month, with discounts if you purchase a longer subscription time.  You can also access the game using SOE's "All Access Pass", which allows you to play all of SOE's game for one flat monthly fee.  --Junior612 (talk) 01:13, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Adding info about the new 14 days trial "Buddy Account", which is aquireable from Sony Entertainment's site.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.227.122.147 (talk) 14:41, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  monthly fee 

message: In how much is Pirates of the Burning Sea Blog an official website? --Mopster (talk) 16:03, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blog 

message: The article uses the future tense ("players will be able to ...") which is no longer relevant since the game has been publically released. Funkyj (talk) 02:10, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Future Tense? 

message: The text seems to use "nations" and "nationals" as separate from "factions" but yet includes the pirates among the playable nations? Huh? And what does the problem with EU servers mean? CapnZapp (talk) 10:30, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Characters section confusing 

message: In the Pirate: Buccaneer section "...can use and collect captured ships deeds and can buff allied ships..." is the implication here that the ships can be cleaned up / repaired.... if so buff is a poor word choice. 
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/buff
if the intent was to rebuff...push back against or repell, stop????
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/rebuff
can it be expanded to clarify as the meaning is Unclear at this point.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.90.235.129 (talk) 01:32, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Could someone please clarify this language...What does BUFF in this context mean, EXACTLY? 

message: Over six months ago, Sony dropped PotBS from its offerings. The game is now hosted by the developers. I updated the text and the infobox to reflect that. Also removed the "Sony Online Entertainment Games" menu as it is no longer relevant. 75.66.122.194 (talk) 22:12, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing of Publisher information 

message: Hello, You are invited to join WikiProject Piracy! We are an established project that has recently become inactive and needs to overhaul its activities. The focus of this WikiProject considerably covers a large historical period and specific topics, so please feel free to contribute within your own area of interest. If you would like to take a look at the project, please click the link above. If you find you would be interested in joining the project, then feel free to sign up here.
<noinclude>Metabaronic (talk) 12:22, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Piracy Needs You!