Talk:Bladder

message: ... of bladder control: doi:10.2215/CJN.04520413 JFW | T@lk 10:32, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review 

message: Considering how human-centric this page is, I think we should change this page into "Human Urinary Bladder" and make a different page for urinary bladders in general, especially considering how different the human's bladder is from other animals'.UserDude (talk) 05:29, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Absolutely.  We should call this spade a spade: if we are discussing the human bladder, then it should be called that.  I also see no harm in having the main article at the urinary bladder namespace being one that discusses such bladders in general and allowing readers to click on a link to the human version in the opening paragraph or under a hatnote.  Absolutely. KDS4444 (talk) 01:50, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

text: There, I have gone and started a draft version of an article on bladders which can be used to replace the current one.  It is available via my userpage, here.  I will continue to work on it, but also would like to encourage others to help create it.  I have completed basic sections for reptiles, amphibians, and fish, all of which could use expanding, and have marked out sections for mammals, birds, and other species.  I don't know which non-vertebrates (any?) have a urinary bladder— would be very interested in including this if someone else does.  The mammals section should have a subsection called "Human urinary bladder" which begins with a "Main article" link but also summarizes the current urinary bladder article (which is about humans) and differentiates the human bladder from other types (to the extent that it is distinct).  KDS4444 (talk) 06:57, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  change this page into human urinary bladder? 

message: Covered more fully on target page Iztwoz (talk) 11:54, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I would support a rename. I've frankly never heard anyone refer to it as "detrusor urinae". That implies there are other detrusor's, which there aren't. Carl Fredrik talk 12:31, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Detrusor urinae muscle]] 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Vertex (urinary bladder) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 8#Vertex (urinary bladder) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:54, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Vertex (urinary bladder)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved. There is consensus to move as proposed here by policy basis as well as numbers. The main point is that this topic is primary for the more concise proposed title, and opposition is weak. Yes, there are other uses (like “swim bladder”), but that doesn’t mean this use is not primary. Certainly no evidence of any other use having comparable claim to the title was provided. Furthermore, the fact that Bladder is a PRIMARYREDIRECT to this article establishes community consensus regarding this being primary. And nobody even tried to challenge CONCISION, demonstrating how solid that is. I just don’t see any policy basis to oppose in this discussion. Demonstrating the ambiguity of “bladder” doesn’t begin to show this use is not the primary topic for this term. —  В²C ☎ 07:26, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Urinary bladder →  – Per WP:CRITERIA, we should strive for concision. Much like we use arm to refer to the human arm, it makes sense to use bladder as the title to refer to the human bladder. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 00:36, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Google "bladder" and tell me how many of the search results on the first page are for a swim bladder rather than a urinary bladder. When someone searches for simply "bladder" on Google or Wikipedia, they are highly likely to be looking for this article. That makes it the primary topic. This is no different than Diabetes being the article title for  diabetes mellitus even though Diabetes insipidus is also a thing. When someone says "diabetes" unqualified they mean diabetes mellitus, and when someone says "bladder" unqualified they mean a urinary bladder. Rreagan007 (talk) 06:05, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Obviously, Google search will be skewed towards medical usage. Wikipedia is more than simply a medical reference, however, it is also a scientific one. On the contrary, pageviews tell a different story, with both of them at similar levels of usage, even if the urinary one is around twice as popular.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 07:47, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Google search results skew towards what most people are looking for when they search a particular term. Google is very, very good at that. Rreagan007 (talk) 17:59, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

text: Moving Bladder (disambiguation) to Bladder would probably require a separate RM discussion. Anyone who supports moving urinary bladder to bladder must by definition think that bladder is a primary redirect for urinary bladder, thus it can be inferred that they would be opposed to moving the DAB page. Rreagan007 (talk) 18:01, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

text: Support per nom  --- Tbf69 P • T 15:51, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 3 March 2023