lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Harold Maxwell-Lefroy

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). Material was copied from ODNB. Suspect material has been removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:49, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Who is Moonriddengirl and why is she so worried about him. 2603:8080:9E06:8BDE:C055:E671:FD09:CD83 (talk) 04:42, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: Lefroy is likely in this photograph but unable to tell for sure. It could be the person seated second from right. Shyamal (talk) 12:01, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Amazing 2603:8080:9E06:8BDE:C055:E671:FD09:CD83 (talk) 04:37, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image
Talk:Dante's

message: Might be worth mentioning Karaoke from Hell:
* https://www.portlandmercury.com/feature/2018/04/04/19790874/if-you-want-to-sing-out
* https://www.pdxmonthly.com/arts-and-culture/2020/05/today-s-internet-artifact-is-this-20-year-old-portland-mercury-music-calendar
*https://www.portlandmercury.com/newcomers-guide-2017/2017/09/13/19313980/a-newcomers-guide-to-portlands-best-music-venues
etc. ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:26, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Karaoke from Hell
Talk:DragonBlade: The Legend of Lang

message: Lucius could have let huo an saved him but instead he told huo an to kill him later only huo an fought the battle and won he always use the band of lucius to remember him  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 105.112.99.15 (talk) 12:33, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lucius mistake
Talk:Satyricon (nightclub)

message: This article is in terrible shape and needs to be rewritten for style and purges crap. It's structure is completely non-standard and quite frankly half full of irrelevant babble. =//= Johnny Squeaky 05:13, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, it needs help. But how does deleting negative content from the article help improve it? Wikipedia articles should be balanced, unbiased, and from a neutral point of view. Simply saying "there's an awesome club and it had some awesome acts" is perfect for the club's website, but not acceptable on Wikipedia. Looking forward to working with you to improve it! tedder (talk) 05:39, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terrible Shape 

message: Some notable acts missing include The Jesus Lizard (which played a couple near-legendary shows there) and Neurosis. I'm sure there are many others.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:1C2:101:AB3:0:0:0:D617 (talk) 03:58, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Notable Bands
Talk:Zoot Horn Rollo

message: The text and the infobox have two different dates listed. —Gaff ταλκ 03:02, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  birthdate?? 
Talk:Pink Martini

message: The mention of "In November 2011, they played at the Balboa Theater with the Bonita Vista High School band" was added to the page before the event occurred, taking away from the surprise during the encore.
Pkalmar (talk) 22:52, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: Heard a track in a Visa Commercial on TV in the United States today. Pakopako (talk) 01:53, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pink Martini in Popular Culture 

message: Any objection to merging Heinz Records into this article?  I'm not seeing how it might meet WP:CORP now or in the future.  Not really a record label in the way most people define it as the only artists released by this label are Pink Martini and it's lead singer.--RadioFan (talk) 14:56, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heinz Records
Talk:Actinotoxin

message: Actinotoxin does not appear in any chemical database I have searched: SciFinder, PubChem, PubMed, eMolecules, ChemSpider, etc.  Is it a crude extract, a mixture, or a single chemical compound?  As far as I can tell, actinotoxin does not appear in the chemical or medical literature except for the 1902 paper I added to the article, and in passing references to that paper.  Can anyone find any additional info regarding actinotoxin?  -- Ed (Edgar181) 18:12, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Thermals

message: After looking at the Thermals own bio (http://www.thethermals.com/home.html), I found that the general heading and the history section are a direct rip, down to the letter. Personally, I don't have the resources to rewrite the entire history section, though I will change the heading. Should this be deleted anyway?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sas556 (talk • contribs) 18:34, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blatant plagarism 

message: I know nothing about this band, I just happened across it while browsing Category:Oregon musical groups. That said, the intro seems to contradict itself with "Original guitarist Ben Barnett (...) left shortly after More Parts per Million was released in 2003, reverting guitar duties back to Hutch". Which is it? Was Ben Barnett the original guitarist or was Hutch? If it was Ben then it follows that guitar duties did not "revert" to anyone.
The quotation from WW probably should be cited too. --Zytsef 06:31, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Problems in intro

message: The current picture (File:Thermals Candid3.jpg) is incorrect; I saw the band live a few days ago, and there is a new drummer, as seen in this recent photo. However, I am completely & utterly rubbish at both uploading photos and getting the correct free-use rationales, so could someone please find a suitable photo and upload it? Thanks, GiantSnowman 17:38, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That picture-stuff is easy, just take the advanced search on flickr, check the three boxes at the bottom (the Creative-Commons-stuff), and use one of the tools for uploading. However, I do not think a picture being dated means it must be replaced; a proper description would be sufficient, IMHO. --NoCultureIcons (talk) 01:00, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 
Talk:Acyl group

message: Where's the picture of the generalised formula for this one? Annonieymouse (talk) 08:03, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formula picture 

message: The diagram at the top, where the acyl group appears in 6 contexts, is extremely useful and clarifying, a summarizing remedy for a jungle of definitions. Thanks. 89.217.9.188 (talk) 22:42, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boy, that is helpful 

message: At first glance an acyl group looks a lot like a carbonyl group, yet neither entry discusses their relation. Someone should really fix that! I'm too tired to work out what the difference is myself right now. --Oolong (talk) 19:36, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Like carbonyl, but...
Talk:Acyl chloride

message: * Mechanism of SOCl2, PCl3, PCl5.
* Mechanism of DMF
* Balance equation with cyanuric chloride
* Check - DIBAH reduces to 1° alcohol? Or aldehyde? Reusch says former, Rosenmund reaction says latter.
* Draw diagram for FC acylation. Reaction in Friedel-Crafts reaction is not very nice.
--Rifleman 82 (talk) 20:26, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Things to do 

message: Does the R group in RCOCl really have to be an "organic radical"? Only one reaction shown on the page (the Appel Reaction) had a radical at all. From what I understand, the beauty of Acid Chlorides is that you can put virtually any R group onto it, allowing addition to any nucleophilic functional group.
An explanation would be appreciated, but if one is not available in a few days, I'll go ahead and remove that part of the opening paragraph. Uhjoebilly (talk) 00:33, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Radical R Group?
Talk:Adams' catalyst

message: What else needs to be done to transform this from a stub to an article? dil 15:00, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it could use some expansion on the catalysis (picture and catalytic cycle, maybe?), though I do feel like removing the stub-mark, and to clasify it as a start.  So not much.  --Dirk Beetstra T C 15:16, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Status

message: A caution needs to be added to this article as platinum black (which is formed during a reduction with Adam's catalyst) can catch on fire when exposed to air or when mixed with other organic chemicals.  Fires have occurred when metal catalysts are exposed to plastics.--theslave (talk) 03:06, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes a cautionary comment is appropriate, but Wikipedia usually does not offer advice.--Smokefoot (talk) 03:30, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Warning

message: I added an equation to show the reduction of PtO2 to Pt as Pt is the actual active catalyst for the reduction.  Added reference for reduction.  Great catalyst works really well!--theslave (talk) 02:21, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: My understanding is that the catalyst is probably not Pt, but some ill-defined oxide. The Pt Metals Review does not offer much help, although the reference is useful in some ways. The nature of the catalytic species has not been determined to my knowledge.  It would be useful to have a semi-modern review on the nature of the catalyst. Possibly eEROS.--Smokefoot (talk) 03:30, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: In Wikipedia, relatively low priority is accorded to primary references (journals), see WP:secondary.  Like most encyclopedias, the emphasis here is on reviews and books, the specialized references being primarily reserved for historical purposes.  Although well intentioned, your gesture to look into the Pt vs PtOx theme is unlikely to be fruitful. In any case, good job on this article.--Smokefoot (talk) 01:54, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Added Reduction
Talk:Abraham E. Kazan

message: Expanded beyond initial pieceJuda S. Engelmayer 00:11, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  rewrote, added facts, etc. 
Talk:Roman Catholic Diocese of Osnabrück

message: I am in the process of rewriting this page, so please have patience! Regards --Isolani 10:20, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources.  Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Dana boomer (talk) 01:58, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Cotton Club (Portland, Oregon)

message: Doing a peer review for class. Don't really see any changes. Maybe their work is still in the sandbox. :) Pegrowe62 (talk) 03:06, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer review
Talk:Adipate

message: Adipate is not a  substance, only the ion formed by the deprotonation of adipic acid. As such, the value of a separate article is limited and is not how almost all other organic acids are treated (for example citric acid and citrate, hexanoic acid and hexanoate). Following a discussion at WT:WikiProject_Chemicals#Carboxylic_acids_vs_carboxylate_anion/esters, this and many similar articles are being merged with their parent acid, leaving the original pages as redirects. The content related to salts and esters will, of course, be retained. Michael D. Turnbull (talk) 16:43, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion to merge this article with the one for adipic acid
Talk:Loudun

message: What kind of citation is needed ? Where are the citations of other books ? I have cited the original book. Though in Swedish, it's clear that speaks about our theme. --Ignoto (talk) 22:34, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The other works are bluelinked to articles that contain references. If the Swedish article about the book clearly states that the book is about this subject and is referenced then you can link the title to the article. This is not the same as using Wikipedia as a reference itself. It may seem pedantic but that's how it works. Dom from Paris (talk) 05:56, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Eyvind Johnson's book
Talk:1909 VFL season

message: The page Victorian Football League season 1909 seems to have the same information as this page, with more detail. As this one is in keeping with the standard article name, can someone with some knowledge of the AFL merge and redirect the other page. Thanks - Foxhill 10:23, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Victorian Football League season 1909 merge proposal

message: Is there somebody out there with the understanding and the skills to correct the formatting of the article. The entire second half of the article needs to be converted back to left-justified text; and, given that I have no idea how such circumstances were engineered, I have no idea about how to rectify the situation. Thanks, in advance, Lindsay658 (talk) 04:31, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Tried to fix it, and I was only partially successful.  According to the page history, it's been like this since at least late 2014. -- I dream of horses    @  05:10, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've been connected with Wikipedia for almost 13 years, and I've never seen this sort of central-justified text before. Thanks for your attempt to fix it. I have no idea of where to go now. Lindsay658 (talk) 07:47, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Now fixed. A closing center tag in  that is part of  on which  is based, had been removed. Reinserting it (Special:Diff/863540996/863968403) solved the problem in all these articles.  Sam Sailor 07:55, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Sam Thank you so much for the explanation, and thank you even more for fixing the problem. Lindsay658 (talk) 16:44, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  No worries, mate, happy to help. Sam Sailor 19:45, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Formatting
Talk:Carnac

message: this article claims more than 10,000 while your own entry on the stones cites more than 3,000~~!~  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.145.94.21 (talk) 15:32, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  how many stones 
Talk:Aldrin

message: Leyo, thanks for the ping and the request, I have added some sourced info about the estimated US production volume in the mid-60s. I am still looking for international (also accumulated) production volumes. Please don´t hesitate to discuss/correct/revert if you should disagree with one of my edits. JimRenge (talk) 14:17, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The original source seems to be section 1.2.1.1 of doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6461-3_1. --Leyo 18:49, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I get a DOI Resolution Error for this link.  JimRenge (talk) 19:54, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Production volume
Talk:Aliquat 336

message: Capryl is the same as Octyl. So the second phrase has to be decyl!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.69.96.118 (talk) 13:52, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming mixup 

message: Aldrich (and our lede that close-paraphrases it) says it's a mixture of chain-lengths, but then both also say it has a specific molecular weight that corresponds to only one specific set of chains. Should the article be handled as a trade-name for a mixture of chemicals (a product rather than a specific chemical entity), with separate information for each component? Or is there reference that there really is just a trivially minor "other" homolog present (and the article image adjusted accordingly)? DMacks (talk) 20:23, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Specific chemical makeup
Talk:E. Morris Miller

message: http://www.utas.edu.au/library/exhibitions/morris_miller/psychologist.html
is this him?
: -- 88.75.218.242 (talk) 14:42, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: -- 88.75.218.242 (talk) 14:44, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Alizarine Yellow R

message: The molecular formula and molar mass refer to the sodium salt but I think the structural formula refers to the acid.  The molecular weight of the acid is 287.23 and its CAS number is 2243-76-7.  Does CAS 1783-34-9 refer to the sodium salt? Biscuittin (talk) 15:45, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Figures confirmed and entered in chembox.  Still not sure about structural formula. Biscuittin (talk) 16:07, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification of chembox needed
Talk:Allethrins

message: It would be great if in text citation is made instead of using separated references. SchwarzeMelancholie (talk) 21:29, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  In-text Citation needed 

message: I have suggested merging bioallethrin into this article because the text of bioallethrin suggests it is the same thing, but I'm not sure.  Anyone know? -- Ed (Edgar181) 23:22, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: According to   , bioallethrin is a mixture of two stereomers, while allethrin is a mixture of all eight stereomers of what this article calls "allethrin I". --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 14:34, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge suggestion 

message: Is the author sure that the cats' susceptibility is due to lack of glucuronidase?  I would think glucuronosyl transferase would be the dysfunctional or non-functional enzyme in this case.  Please see the following reference for details on this reasoning: ^ Court MH and Greenblatt DJ (2000). "Molecular genetic basis for deficient acetaminophen glucuronidation by cats: UGT1A6 is a pseudogene, and evidence for reduced diversity of expressed hepatic UGT1A isoforms". Pharmacogenetics. 10 (4): 355–69. DOI:10.1097/00008571-200006000-00009. .
I also agree that a citation is important here. Vanwa71 (talk) 09:24, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, UGT is a likely enzyme in this context; I've changed it in the artice. Thanks for your reference; I suppose it does not mention allethrins? --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 16:24, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question about glucuronidase
Talk:Allicin

message: In the entry, it states that "Alliin is an amino acid that does not build proteins." I really don't see that from the structure of Alliin. There is no carboxyl or amine group!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.173.116.132 (talk) 02:22, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In a rat study, allicin was found to be an activator of TRPA1. The neurons released neurotransmitters in the spinal cord to generate pain signals and released neuropeptides at the site of sensory nerve activation, resulting in vasodilation as well as inflammation.
Fleischauer, A.T. and Arab, L. (2001) "Garlic and cancer: a critical review of the epidemiologic literature." J. Nutrition 131: 1032S-1040S
Phlatulator (talk) 12:52, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adverse Effects 

message: In the ball-and-stick model used on the page, :File:R-allicin-3D-balls.png, the double-bond between the sulfur and oxygen atoms in the thiosulfinate bond is poorly displayed—the one stick of the bond is almost occluded by the other, and while when viewing the image at full size, it is clear that the bond is a double bond, when the image is shrunk down as on this page, the few pixels of the occluded stick blend into their surroundings and the bond looks like a single bond. This confused me for quite a while. To improve the quality of this image, I would choose to take it from a different angle, orbiting the camera to the right of where it was for the particular picture that was taken—this would improve the visibility of the double bond. ThinkingCat (talk) 01:25, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  S=O bond badly shown in ball-and-stick model 

message: An intermediate is shown as pyruvic acid. It is not. The nitrogen is shown correctly as coming off as ammonia. The nitrogen can't be in both molecules, the Pyruvic acid and ammonia.
Tero111 (talk) 12:05, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Biosynthesis slide has a small error
Talk:Allyl isothiocyanate

message: this sentance: "Allyl isothiocyanate serves the plant as a defense against herbivores; since it is harmful to the plant itself citation needed, it is stored in the harmless form of the glucosinolate, separate from the myrosinase enzyme." contains several statements about allyl isothiocyanate. 
1, that it is not present in the plant tissue but instead created by an enzyme that is released when the plant tissue is mechanically broken. Check. 
2, that it is harmful to the plant itself (when present after creation). dobtful, a citation would be needed to make this acceptable.
3, that it is not stored but rather created only in case of damage BECAUSE it is harmful to the plant itself (and not only to the animal damaging the plant). even more doubtful, this one requires BOTH a citation AND a thorough explanation since this is such a speculative statement especially considering that it would be unfeasible anyway to store allyl isothiocyanate for the plant because of the unstable properties of the chemical.
i added a citation needed tag (probably in a wrong format --now fixed--) to the text but it really needs some attention from an editor who is confident with the topic.
89.134.199.32 (talk) 13:23, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  citation and/or clarification needed: harmful to the plant itself 

message: Including 724 references since 2015, that corresponds to about one paper every other day.  We cannot cite them all.--Smokefoot (talk) 15:17, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: 4631 publications on allyl isothiocyanate

message: and  This seems partly redundant and partly just stuff that should be elsewhere. If cited it would be good to have the second half of that in the article. Can you do that Vengeance 01? Invasive Spices (talk) 21:21, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Right, I'm a little confused what dithiocarbamate thiuram has to do with allyl isothiocyanate specifically, I guess they're both thiocarbonyl compounds? The text that was added is actually also a WP:COPYVIO for Encyclopedia Britannica, and the same information about vulcanization is on the article thiuram disulfide, where it's relevant.-- Patrick, oѺ∞ 21:44, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

text: *I see. Nothing needs to be changed then. Invasive Spices (talk) 23:15, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Vengeance 01's addition