Talk:FirstClass

message: Should it be mentioned that OpenText is loosing quite a few customers to Google and Microsoft's free(and paid) offerings? Mainly Google Apps for Edu and Microsoft Office 365 for Education (formerly Live@edu).
Dtaylor05 (talk) 18:06, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Market Share Loss to Google and Microsoft 

message: The language is not even by far neutral.
Even if the article is indeed pretty big and well written, it doesn't mean it isn't spam.
This time it should really be deleted or all dubious text trimmed.
:Please re-read the Talk page guidelines, including "Be Positive", and "Deal with Facts". Please quote specifics; vague comments aren't very useful.DLLHell (talk) 02:38, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Blatant advertising Again

message: Give me a break. An anon user posts an AD tag to the page without any explaination. I remove, at which point he/she posts several fairly minor points to my talk page. I come back to find this SD instead. I'm inclined simply to delete it. Maury 21:20, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  SD tag 

message: I declined the speedy deletion of this article for the following reasons:
# I've heard of this thing in "real life", so there's a chance it can be notable.
# Requested CSD G12, but this is hardly "blatant" spam.
# Requested CSD A7 website, but this article is about a software product, not a website.
# Alleged conflicts of interest are not a valid reason to speedy delete an article as such. However, they may be grounds for an AfD discussion.
# In any case, I'd be extremely hesitant to speedy-delete an article that has existed since 2005.
So if anyone still feels strongly about this, please consider AfD instead. Note, however, that possible biases, adversitory language and other problems like that are (in my opinion) better handled through ordinary cleanup - please tag accordingly. Have a nice day. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 17:25, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  SD declined 

message: I and others have added quite a few citations and sources to this article, and removed some of the more subjective material.  Is it good enough at this point to remove the "failure to cite" tag on the article?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by DLLHell (talk • contribs) 05:26, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove failure to cite? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on FirstClass. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110609212511/http://www.ncf.ca/ip/freenet/conferences/com-net93/reports/plen_alt_technologies.txt to http://www.ncf.ca/ip/freenet/conferences/com-net93/reports/plen_alt_technologies.txt
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930185327/http://www.byte.com/art/9409/sec4/art5.htm to http://www.byte.com/art/9409/sec4/art5.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110604214750/http://download.microsoft.com/download/e/9/6/e9627503-eb6c-4798-8b0a-8f584e4f73a7/IDC%20Sept%2004.pdf to http://download.microsoft.com/download/e/9/6/e9627503-eb6c-4798-8b0a-8f584e4f73a7/IDC%20Sept%2004.pdf
*Added archive https://archive.is/20130119002245/http://www.centrinity.com/Divisions/FAV13-0024FC90/FAV13-0000D65B/I0595026A to http://www.centrinity.com/Divisions/FAV13-0024FC90/FAV13-0000D65B/I0595026A
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051107131809/http://www.ofcn.org/whois/ben/Free-Nets/GLFN/First_Class.html to http://www.ofcn.org/whois/ben/Free-Nets/GLFN/First_Class.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:33, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: there's no mention of FC anymore on Opentext's website and www.firstclass.com redirects to Opentext.com perhaps its time to update to that the product has been ended? 75.172.71.109 (talk) 08:27, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  end of life? 

message: These two sections feel like they could be merged perhaps. The Company history section starts in 1999 while the Early history is referring to events significantly before that unless FC became a company at some point, but that not initially clear.  --gilgongo (talk) 07:47, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early history vs Company history?