Talk:Reflex

message: In the remark about Pavlov, conditional reflex is correct - please do not change it to conditioned reflex.
seglea 00:45, 1 Dec 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The physiology of reflexes is a key factor missing from this article. It would be greatly appreciated if an expert on the topic could put in necessary information.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.101.89.179 (talk) 15:22, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Physiology 

message: It's mentioned on , but I don't know what is it. Samohyl Jan 16:36, 25 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  grasping reflex? 

message: I was looking for what reflex meant in linguistics
:: It would be nice if you could elaborate it on reflex (linguistics). Samohyl Jan 18:39, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Iopq, do you mean like in reflexive verb or reflexive pronoun, perhaps?  74.141.161.180 00:56, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reflex in linguistics? 

message: Should this article be merged into reflexology or is it different enough to warrant its own article? NorthernThunder 03:56, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd oppose merge, reflexology is more of a massage technique. A reflex action is different. Robotsintrouble 08:41, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger? 

message: According to the article
:A reflex action or reflex is a biological control system linking stimulus to response and mediated by a reflex arc. 
Is it true also for learned reflexes that they are mediated by a reflex arc, or rather only for built-in ones? If the latter is the case, then the sentence in the article should be fixed. --Dan —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 62.245.110.111 (talk) 11:42, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Both are technically correct, although 'learnt' is a bit idiosyncratic in American circles, much like spilled/spilt.  Amazinrick 04:50, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are learned reflexes mediated by a reflex arc? 

message: If the former, please, revert the well-meant but incorrect edit from 29 May 2007 by User:87.113.77.216 (contribs). (“Reflexes can be built-in or learnt.”) His only other contribution to Wikipedia happens to be wrong. Personally, I don’t know.
—6birc, 18:55, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Both are technically correct, although 'learnt' is a bit idiosyncratic in American circles, much like spilled/spilt.  Amazinrick 04:50, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Learned'' or ''learnt?'' 

message: It might be nice to change it to a ruler, so afterwards you can determine your reaction time for this experiment.
Plus the fact that a whole lot of people don't readily have acces to dollar bills :)
hey wutz up  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.59.191.11 (talk) 20:40, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The dollar bill experiment 

message: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eigenreflex
They have so many more reflexes listed for the medical physical exam than we do.  It would be really nice to have this page.  wikiproject medicine needs your help! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Medicine#Looking_for_Translation_from_German_Wikipedia_page_on_REFLEXES
Thanks Tkjazzer (talk) 18:34, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  looking for translation of this german wikipedia page on Reflexes - it looks to be very good 

message: Scoring of reflexes: two different systems compared (we should discuss both systems here): . JFW | T@lk 21:58, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mayo and NINDS 

message: "Myotatic reflex" redirects here, but no explanation is given. As far as I can tell, it's just a synonym for "reflex".Fuzzform (talk) 01:02, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect 

message: Someone recently rewrote this article's lead section, adding a description of "voluntary reflex actions" and "involuntary reflex actions." Is the new version of the lead section still accurate? Jarble (talk) 06:53, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello Jarble - probably a good idea. It's still only a start class and would be good to see additional material here.  best --Iztwoz (talk) 08:38, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Is there such a thing as a "Voluntary reflex action?"

message: sorry to have to interrupt this little humans-come-first-fantasy... but human reflexes are of a pityfully limited range, from as i understand it our INCONSISTENT needs in the places our genes have mixed, and then flexibility, for mostly temporary retention, UNLIKE with refined encodings/Gexpression+  .
COMPARED, to amazing stuff in the natural world, like say a grasshopper's jump, or (some of ) a bat's microsentivites... a mating-male beetle's  PRE-understanding, of how to wrestle with another, etc.
Surely wonders like SWARM instincts, deserve a listing, if not a LINK.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vurrath (talk • contribs) 13:38, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Instincts should fall under a separate category. Maybe deserving a link here, but to my knowledge, instincts don't operate via a central nervous system. I am working on incorporating non-human reflexes to round out the topic --F4at96 (talk) 14:50, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  page needs non-human reflexes!!  where are they? 

message: — Assignment last updated by Logan753 (talk) 16:13, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: BYU-Biophysics, CELL 568

message: Reflex action 42.105.48.169 (talk) 09:39, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anatomy and physiology