lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Fleadh Cheoil

message: Why isn't this article under its full (and official) name? There are plenty of fleadh cheoil around the country, but the Fleadh Cheoil na hÉireann is unique. It's also the largest music festival in Ireland by a long shot so I'll put that in with a citation now. PS: Just checked again and there's no article yet on the Fleadh Cheoil na hÉireann, although it, wrongly, redirects here. Anyway, I put the citation in at the relevant place. 78.16.173.206 (talk) 21:34, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Fleadh Cheoil na hÉireann
Talk:Hi! Honey (TV series)

message: This story line summary is completely incomprehensible.  I put here only because it's all we have. 
:This is a modern era and at the same time, it is an era for creations. There have been lots of stories about young people who have built up their own businesses. Yet, to be as outstanding as Shu Li, a young guy brimming with talent, there is after all a small number of people like him on the business market today. The products that he designs and also personally a spokesperson for, becomes a fashionable and popular mark. The franchise shops also brings to him all the wealth. This arrogant guy with a big family fortune becomes the idol that every girl dreams about and the guy that every girl chases after. Yet what is the famous Shu Li seeking and wishing for?
Someone figure out what it's is about, please, and add it to the article. RJFJR 19:14, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: story line

message: Just to clarify my edit, it's now WP:EL important point 4 (don't make multiple links from the same webpage), not 5 (about non-english links). I think they changed/re-ordered the order of these important points recently, but since the cast link is reachable from the synopsis page, (right there on the top), there's no reason to have two external links to essentially the same website. Wiki is not a collection of links.--Boffob (talk) 22:56, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmmm, fair enough I suppose, though I think this is a rather rigid and heavy handed enforcement of the guideline for a rather innocuous link. PC78 (talk) 23:19, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry I'm stubborn... It's not a big deal if you reinstate it either (I won't revert). I sometimes go a little compulsively on external links cleaning on various articles, mainly for spamlinks, but I also remove other links that don't follow the the guidelines.--Boffob (talk) 23:43, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cast link 
Category talk:Families by nationality

message: What is the difference between this and :Category:Families by country?  I see no obvious one, so only one of them should exist. --Saforrest 19:16, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Some months later this had the "country" one merged into it after a proposal for merging the other way. In view of some of the sub-subcategories, such as :Category:Families of New York (who could be Irish or Chinese or anything but American), the current name is misleading and should be considered for reverting to the accurately determinable "country" one. Only three users voted for "nationality". The Genealogy Wikia has a "Families by country" category. Robin Patterson (talk) 15:53, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:John Koza

message: I moved this claim here for discussion: "This is the largest computer cluster owned by an individual." I do not know of a way of verifying this statement, but given that there are some very wealthy collectors of supercomputers and massively parallel machines, and also given that there's no statement in the claim on how the size of two clusters could be compared, I do not feel there's enough information to justify this statement in the article. I welcome a discussion here about this. For one thing, the processors in this cluster are very old (PII 450MHz and Alphas), so a much smaller cluster of modern machines would likely have superior compute performance. --Zippy 19:18, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Largest privately owned cluster claim 

message: Has John Koza received a patent for the machine, or has the machine received a patent for something it invented?  Can a machine be granted a patent?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.223.144.43 (talk) 09:56, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The claim is that something invented by the machine has received (or has been submitted for) a patent.  The machine is nicknamed "The Invention Machine."  I don't have the details on the status of the patent. -LesPaul75talk 08:26, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  has received a patent from the US Patent Office.
Talk:Erxian

message: Isn't/wasn't the erxian used in a type of Cantonese music called "hard string"?  Could someone knowledgeable add this info, with a description of this ensemble and what "hard string" means?  Badagnani 19:18, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Hard string
Talk:Otakar Vávra

message: Ahoj Pavle, you did quite a good job with the Vavra's article. I just finished the Witch trials article where I named Boblig among the inquisitors. When I researched this topic I found several Czech Internet sites with info on Boblig and his family background that would be enough for a new Wikipedia entry. David Cruise 20:45, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Acmonia

message: I don't think the last sentence makes sense -- Philadelphia and a city in Asia Minor? --Improv 19:21, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questions 
Talk:John Eatton Le Conte

message: I've added what I could from the Adicks' edition of Le Conte's Report on East Florida. I'll look for more sources. I think it's pretty clear that the family name is Le Conte, not LeConte. Adick's book uses Le Conte, Joseph Le Conte's autobiography has Le Conte on the title page, most of the geographical features in the U.S. named for members of the family are spelled Le Conte, according to the USGS, and it's Le Conte's Thrasher and Le Conte's Sparrow. While other sources have LeConte or Leconte, these spellings seem to be later corruptions. -- Donald Albury (Dalbury)(Talk) 19:23, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:Consensus

message: Hi. There is an ArbCom discussion with one of the main topics being consensus. It is at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Consensus process, censorship, administrators' warnings and blocks in dispute, and responses to appeals. Your input is welcome. This notice is placed to attract objective input (whether in favor or against) of uninvolved editors related to the interest of the consensus policy page. It is not canvassing, 
 Sincerely, Thinker78 (talk) 06:09, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: ArbCom discussion

message: Hello. What happens when a vote is split 50/50? Am I right in thinking topic neutrality wins? Tiggy The Terrible (talk) 09:22, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split Votes
Talk:A360media

message: * Specific text to be added or removed: Add Overview:  (copyvio deleted)
* Reason for the change: Updated company details, including current portfolio and focus.
* References supporting change:
* https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/a360media-deepens-integrated-marketing-solutions-and-expert-content-with-leadership-appointments-301742647.html#:~:text=a360media%20also%20publishes%20more%20than,portion%20of%20a360media's%20retail%20sales.
* https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/a360media-names-andy-wilson-executive-vice-president-and-chief-digital-officer-301756147.html
Marcusata360media (talk) 15:56, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The changes are not supported by neutral, independent, reliable sources. Please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made.   The sources provided are linked to press releases issued by the company. Please provide references from independent reliable secondary sources. Regards,  Spintendo  16:25, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current Details
Talk:List of islands of Alaska

message: Perhaps this page should be organized a little differently than just alphabetically.  This page could link to pages such as the Aleutian Islands and only list the islands that do not fit into the more specific categories.  --Lasunncty 19:26, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm working along those lines... trying to compile a list of all the groups and chains of Islands, so hopefully lists can be compiled on those pages. I'm also thinking of listing the 50 or 100 largest islands of Alaska (by area), and maybe all populated islands. But I haven't found a source for that yet... still in the early stages. --W.marsh 20:19, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a seemingly endless list. It would probably be just as useful if only those islands of a minimum size were considered, unless they were populated or of other notable significance. Backspace (talk) 20:31, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Page organization
Talk:National Register of Historic Places listings in Lauderdale County, Alabama

message: When I searched the database, I found far fewer places listed for "AL, Lauderdale", and didn't find the Rosenbaum House. Is this because (as it appears) that the search-engine isn't very good? -- Finlay McWalter | Talk 19:27, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Four years later, I think the question is moot.  Whatever search-engine is being referred to, there is now a Rosenbaum House article showing NRHP infobox information, and linked from this Lauderdale County list-article. --doncram (talk) 18:05, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Rosenbaum House
Talk:Vanadium oxytrichloride

message: To any wishing to address this problem, I believe that this article might hold relevant information: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intimate_ion_pair.AWearerOfScarves (talk) 12:35, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Intimate = well blended and tiny particles.  --Smokefoot (talk) 13:18, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you! AWearerOfScarves (talk) 19:42, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification template in Preparation
Talk:National Catholic Forensic League

message: Does anyone have a list of past NCFL winners?
TheTrueSora 19:34, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Past Winners 

message: I've just been asked to review Washington Arlington Catholic Forensics League by its author, ImVeryAwesome, and I couldn't find enough sources to establish that it passes the notability guidelines for organisations. It looks like the content of that page might fit well here in a "chapters" section or similar - what do others think? — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 09:33, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Propose merging [[Washington Arlington Catholic Forensics League]] here 

message: A list of true facts is not an explanation nor a definition.  For example what is a speech and debate league?  That could use a whole section.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CFCE:1EE0:299D:BB30:7A98:A27D (talk) 04:19, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assumes prior knowledge.
Talk:Broughton High School, Edinburgh

message: A little research will show that Hugh MacDiarmid was not a 'pupil' but a pupil teacher i.e. a trainee teacher, at Broughton from the age of 16 to 18. He left to become a journalist in 1911. Cassandra.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.12.111.205 (talk) 18:30, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pupil-teacher not pupil 
Talk:International Offshore Rule

message: You should know about this and comment.  One of our editors has systematically depopulated it (from this article perhaps, and among many others), and thinks that is a good reason to delete it. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:58, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Contested deletion [[Category talk:Yachting races]]
Talk:Limbury

message: this page as well as Farley Hill and Stopsley need a local historian or expert to give a overview of what has happened in these areas. thanks Random articles 19:43, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Phaistos Disc/Archive 4

message: I'm uneasy with the long lists of external links in section Decipherment claims. It seems everybody adds his (or his friend's) homepage to the list and hope to attract traffic. Whereas all these claims may be remotely interesting, I assume not all of them are of encyclopedic quality. Remember the Wikipedia:No original research policy. It's not a black and white case here, as simply linking to original research can be O.K. 
Summing up, my proposal is only to keep those links in Decipheremnt claims, which attracted some citeable discussion. I'll do some Googling on this, but it would be easier, if those who added the links give some references.
Pjacobi 14:45, 9 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Decipherment claims 

message: I removed the following remark from the article page, as it was written as an comment -- Pjacobi 12:02, 12 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  From article 

message: "The site apparently collapsed during the famous ca. 1628 BC event of the Minoan world and the Mediterranean basin at large. " I didn't know an exact year had been fixed. Or perhaps this famous event is something else... Wetman 20:34, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Is this just a pretentious reference to the [[Santorini|Thera]] explosion?

message: I restored a half-sentence that I had removed earlier: "some ancillary but clearly stamped signs - in the likes of toponymical marks". 
Does anyone know what this refers to? Prater 10:39, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: this is gibberish. there is no such thing as a "toponymical mark" remove, please. dab (ᛏ) 10:50, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Toponymical marks 

message: ::I find pretty funny that Gbrunner considers as "a NPOV" (sic) to make believe the Wikipedia readers that only "enthousiastics" would say that the decipherment of the Phaistos Disk is theorically possible, and denies as a fact that all the scholars who have applied the Shannon's Formula to the Phaistos Disk agree about the value (c.225 signs) of the "Unicity Distance" !... Moreover, I wonder why he doesn't find neutral a redaction giving the opinion of both parties concerning the theorical possibility of deciphering the Disk : the today "intuitive" opinion of a (probable?) majority, and the one of some scholars, scientifically based upon Shannon's work. (80.90.39.25 14:57, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV
Talk:Battle of Guadalajara

message: Even if it was a defeat to their own cause, many Spanish Nationalists' didn't felt that way. Or at last, many Spanish soldiers laughed at Italians, unable to defeat Republicans, moking at their "grandeur". Or it could be a way to took distance from CTV defeat. Anyway, in the Nationalist side was born a humor version of Fascist Song "Camisa Nera" (Black Shirt) which chorus said: "Gualadajara no es Abisina/ Aquí los rojos tiran bombas explosivas" ("Gualadajara is not Abisnia/ Here, the Reds throw explosive bombs") --85.48.71.176 02:14, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia about Gualadajara 

message: The book " Politica e strategia in cento anni di storia d' Italia "( Policy and strategy in one hundred years of Italian wars ) vol 3 " Le guerre italiane degli anni 30 " ( The Italian wars of the 1930s  ) author general Mario Montanari published by  
Historical Office of the General staff of the Italian army ( 2005 ) concerning the Italian losses of  Corpo Truppe Volontarie ( CTv ) provides the following figures : 423 dead  , 496 prisoners and missing people , 1835  injured  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.67.195.160 (talk) 07:47, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  About Italian losses  

message: Is the first photo really showing National army fighters with the field gun? I ask because their helmets look suspiciously like those used by the International Brigades rather than the standard Spanish army issue.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.120.69.147 (talk) 14:10, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the photo accurate? 

message: Unfortunately I'm unable to obtain access to the referenced book of Coverdale (http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt13x112j) but I was able to find an extract (https://www.jstor.org/stable/260268?read-now=1&seq=16#page_scan_tab_contents, pg.68) that specifically deal with Guadalajara thus I decided to lower the Italian casualties to the currently written Clm45 (talk) 11:01, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Italian losses
Talk:Atchafalaya River

message: There needs to be a history section which discusses the log jam on the Red River called the Great Raft in the 1800s. Once the logjam was cleared, the Atchafalaya's inflow and outflow became greater and siphoned flow from the Mississippi. I like to saw logs! (talk) 17:25, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: History

message: What's the significance of the point chosen to represent the river, 30°17ʹ5ʺ N 91°40ʹ19ʺ W?
If it were up to me I'd probably use the source, 31°1ʹ12ʺ N 91°45ʹ W. —Tamfang (talk) 00:19, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting, when I headed this section "coordinates" that word did not show up. —Tamfang (talk) 00:24, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  arbitrary geography 

message: The article begins with a claim that the Atchafalaya is "a distributary of the Mississippi River." The courses of the Mississippi, Red River, and Atchafalaya have changed many times, and they are intricately woven together, so shouldn't the article address the issue of the Atchafalaya's relationship to the Red River as well as to the Mississippi? The graphic showing the Old River Control Structure suggests that the Atchafalaya was a distributary of the Mississippi only between the fifteenth century and 1831 when Shreve's Cut again made the Atachafalaya the southern extension of the Red River as it is today, with only a couple of canals connecting it to the Mississippi. How much of the flow of the Atchafalaya comes from the Mississippi, and how much from the Red River? Tedcampbell (talk) 11:30, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question about Relationship to the Red River?
Talk:Supreme Headquarters Allied Expeditionary Force

message: These are two parts of the same organization. One is the HQ, the other is the Commander. Right now there's hardly enough info for two articles, so I've proposed merging them. I think it's appropriate since they are so similar.--Chaser T 05:21, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge. Seperate articles about the position of commander for units are completely unnecessary.--Nobunaga24 05:50, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge. As per South West Pacific Area (command), Pacific Ocean Areas (command), South East Asia Command etc. What about Supreme Commander Allied Powers (Japan) ? The actual command seems to have also been called SCAP or simply GHQ. Grant65 | Talk 07:52, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Merged. Thanks, folks.--Chaser T 07:33, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  merger proposal 

message: Vandenberg seems to have been replaced by "Maj. Gen. William O. Butler" at some point. GraemeLeggett (talk) 22:59, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deputy air 

message: Denmark is missing in the list of occupied countries. 87.50.122.162 (talk) 10:38, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Denmark is missing in the list of occupied countries.
Talk:Hearst Television

message: It might be interesting to consider how HTV has generally left the logos of its stations intact, even while imposing a national standard for other graphic design and presentation elements, and perhaps more generally a "hands-off" management style that rewards successful local station managers.  This contrasts with, for example, Sinclair, where many programming decisions are made by corporate HQ in Hunt Valley and local managers play a much smaller role.  The obvious example would be WCVB-TV, which has had the same logo since it signed on in 1972 (through four different owners) and for most of that time had the same general manager, Paul LaCamera.  KCRA, likewise, has kept its logo essentially unchanged for more than 30 years.  121a0012 20:04, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logos 

message: Please get with Dish and put our local channel back on again.  We have always watched KCRA most of the time.  Now we can't watch it. 47.150.75.21 (talk) 16:03, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dish & Hearst dispute on price
Talk:Kingdom of Saxony

message: Could this article merge into a larger article: History of Saxony
:No. It's a former country and should therefore have its own entry. - 52 Pickup 14:22, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: the languages are wrong. old saxon doesn't refere to what the common people call "saxon" nowadays. its a north german dialect/language. the dialect/language used in the kingdom of saxony is based on the dialects from the time of the electorate of saxony - an old exstinct variety of the thurungian-upper saxon dialects. since that old dialect was also the basic for modern standard german, "German" would be just fine as language.
one could also consider putting the "Meißener Kanzleideutsch" (german: "Meißen Chancery German" or "Saxon Chancery Language) as a written language, though it was not used the 19th century anymore.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrotsten (talk • contribs) 16:56, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd also suggest adding Sorbian. YOMAL SIDOROFF-BIARMSKII (talk) 14:56, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Language 

message: It is my opinion that this section of the article can be reduced in size. The section takes a bit to much of the article, and reducing the size of it could make room to talk about more subjects. Zyxrq (talk) 02:34, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Governance section 

message: A request has been made to rename "Soviet Republic of Saxony" to "Saxony in the German Revolution (1918–1919)". With the renaming, "Soviet Republic of Saxony" would be removed from this page's infobox, and the reference to it in the text modified.
Please join the discussion here. GHStPaulMN (talk) 15:32, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request to rename "Soviet Republic of Saxony"