Talk:List of Argentine provinces by Human Development Index

message: This data belongs to the 1998 Human Development Report, it's not a report, this is a statistical annexe. Your Human Development Index is estimated, otherwise you can find the official report 2005 by United Nations Development Programme in Argentina (PNUD), this website here or just downloading this file with 1995, 2000, 2002, 2004 reports.--Heraldicos (talk) 04:20, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Another option is go to the Spanish Wikipedia here, and only translate it to English, because this table was verified with those reports. Thanks. --Heraldicos (talk) 04:23, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Updated!. --Prodigynet (talk) 01:27, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong Data 

message: How are the HDI of all provinces of Argentina lower than the entire country? The last 2008 report says that the HDI of Argentina is 0.860. Even the 2004 data says that HDI is 0.849 = http://hdr.undp.org/en/media/HDI_2008_EN_Tables.pdf . The Buenos Aires Province, Cordoba Province, Mendoza province and Santa Fe province have 90% of Argentina population, and they HDI from this list is lower than 0.800. How it could be if the entire country has a HDI of 0.849 in 2004?  This list is complety wrong.--Italodal (talk) 21:55, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Wrong Data Still 

message: Until we don't have a real data and good sources, we can't put wrong data without any veracity. When we have a good source, then we could write this article.--Italodal (talk) 02:31, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong data was deleted 

message: Here is the province of Buenos Aires's HDI from 2001: http://hdr.undp.org/en/reports/nationalreports/latinamericathecaribbean/argentina/Argentina_Buenos%20Aires_2004_2005_sp.pdf In the page 293 says that in the year 2001 the HDI is 0,854. In the Wikipedia article says that the Buenos Aires province HDI in the years of 2000 and 2002 are 0,7816 and 0,7656. The source is the UN itself. I Think we shoud remove these wrong data. The two links sources of this page don't work. Please TownDown try to be more moderate. Thank's.--Italodal (talk) 20:33, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Here why this table is wrong 

message: Here your article here is not talking about provinces of Argentina, but we have already the correct report here talking about hdi the provinces in Argentina. Please don't vandalise this article again or I'll report you.--TownDown (talk) 17:53, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello TownDown how are you ? Here is the source why we can't use the data from Argentina: ¿Se puede comparar el IDHP entre diferentes países?A diferencia del IDH, el IDHP sólo se elaboró para estimar discrepancias regionales en nuestro país. Distintos países han construidos distintas versiones del IDH, adaptándolas a las peculiaridades de los distintos contextos. http://www.undp.org.ar/desarrollohumano/preguntas_frecuentes.html. In English : Can you compare different of IDHP between countries? Unlike the HDI, the IDHP was only developed to estimate regional discrepancies in our country. Different countries have different versions of the HDI constructed, adapted to the peculiarities of different contexts. The UN global report, and the reports of the other countries (except Argentina and Chile) use the GDP per capita (PPP) . In other way Chile and Argentina use the average income per capita, and not the GDP per capita (PPP). I think we should to remove the data of Argentina and Chile, or delete the article, because the information is wrong. Thank's. --Italodal (talk) 23:28, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Once again, there is the report 2005... and that's that, ...period. --TownDown (talk) 07:08, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Here why this table is right ........ and you're wrong 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of Argentine provinces by Human Development Index. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://webarchive.loc.gov/all/20100401011841/http%3A//www.worldvaluessurvey.com/ to http://www.worldvaluessurvey.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:30, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified