Talk:Air Products

message: :Image:AirProducts logo pms347.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:43, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:AirProducts logo pms347.jpg

message: There's no mention in this article of the "delaware city disaster, 1977," which is brought up in the Nitrous Oxide wiki entry.  In the Nitrous entry, it's neither linked nor sited, and not listed here.  Does anyone know about this?Aceholiday (talk) 14:23, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delaware City Disaster, 1977 

message: Anyone know why the history section was deleted?Robbin' Knowledge (talk) 00:50, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why was the history section deleted? 

message: The first sentence of the "Environmental record" is this:
*"In 2015, Air Products was awarded the Rushlight Hydrogen and Fuel Cells industry award for the Series 10 hydrogen fuelling station."
2015 hasn't happened yet, so this cannot be accurate.  Somebody with more information than I should correct this oversight. PokeHomsar (talk) 00:00, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  In 2015... 

message: Reference 8 for the yahoo article relating to the DJSI index is broken.  This statement seems wrong--should it be percentile?
"Only the top 94 percent of the 987 largest North American companies are ultimately selected for the DJSI North America Index."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.4.70.31 (talk) 13:29, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  DJSI Index 

message: Air Products in Pasadena Texas has been the subject of complaints by nearby residents due to the loud noise produced by the factory. Allegations against Air Products claim multiple city noise ordinancesPasadena Noise Ordinances are being broken regularly due to the high volume and frequency centers of the noise. Several YouTube videosFactory Noise Factory recording Noise Issue illustrating the noise issue have surfaced. On February 11th, 2021, the Air Products region manager, Ken Miller, met with two members of the Pasadena Citizens Advisory Council https://pasadenacac.org/ to discuss noise issues caused by the factory. Despite the existence of noise complaints from as early as 2013, multiple video and witness accounts, Miller did not acknowledge any issue with the plant or indicate that any steps would be taken to remedy the noise in the future.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jakelazerz (talk • contribs) 19:47, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversy