Wikipedia talk:Tools/Navigation popups/Archive 2

message: Have you considered proposing that a stripped-down version of your popup script be included in the common Javascript file?  You don't want the revert link in there, and probably you want to leave out the content-fetching previews due to server strain, but most of the other functions would be very handy for general use. —Simetrical (talk • contribs) 05:22, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think it's stable enough for that yet. Also, this would doubtless cause lots of friction with people who dislike the tool. However, if I did consider this then I'd definitely want to keep the previews in since they're a lot more useful to general readers than the navigation links. Lupin|talk|popups 04:36, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I was thinking they'd put undue stress on the servers if everyone used them.  They do have to call up the full page to show the first paragraph/image, right? —Simetrical (talk • contribs) 02:49, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know if they would or not. General use would certainly increase server load, but I suspect not by much. The reason is that the previews are generated from the raw wikitext, which can be fetched much more efficiently than the fully rendered pages. Lupin|talk|popups 04:06, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Really?  I thought the pages were aggressively cached, so the only page-transfer expense is bandwidth regardless.  How much smaller is the wikitext than the rendered page?  This page's wikitext is over half the length of the page (although the ratio is probably a good bit less for smaller pages, since CSS/JS/etc. is fixed overhead).  Anyway, I think asking a developer before adding any kind of page-fetching to the general JS files would be wise. —Simetrical (talk • contribs) 19:50, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  General availability? 

message: How do I revert Using Popups? WHen ever I click Revert, It doesn't do anything to the page. --Z.Spy 01:41, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Revert Problem

message: This script doesn't work under FF 1.5.0.2 (the newest stable available) for Windows (exact data Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060308 Firefox/1.5.0.2)
WebDeveloper reports two errors:
Error: pg is not defined
Source File: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Lupin/popups.js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript&dontcountme=s
Line: 185
Error: log is not defined
Source File: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Lupin/popups.js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript&dontcountme=s
Line: 2847
I am not a JavaScript guy, so other than noticing that these appear to be defined (as window.pg and window.log) at the top, I can't figure out why this error appears.
nneonneo 02:12, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I expect these errors are transient (I don't know their cause) and will disappear after you give your cache a good cleaning out. Lupin|talk|popups 03:28, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Firefox 1.5.0.2 broken 

message: Are there any other variables that can be used for popupRevertSummary besides for %s? TheJabberwʘck 19:11, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You can use $1, $2 and so on for the extended summaries, I think. Lupin|talk|popups 03:27, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  popupRevertSummary 

message: I think I'm getting errors. Sometimes when I try to load a contributions page, I get a "Cannot load page. Operation aborted" error. I'm pretty sure this has something to do with popups as I only get it on Wikipedia contributions pages, and have only got it since having popups installed. What's confusing about it is that I get the error a few seconds after the page has loaded and is being displayed... Hope someone can help. --Darth Deskana (talk page) 19:18, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you get it with the script disabled? Do you get it if you load the page without moving your mouse at all, or only when you move the mouse over links? Which browser/os are your using? Lupin|talk|popups 03:32, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Errors 

message: *When over an article link, we have access to the talk page, but when over a talk page link, we don't have directarticle access.
**If you use the menus, then you should see links at the bottom of the actions menu.
*Template page rendering would gain from taking <includeonly> and <noinclude> tags into account. Circeus 00:35, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  2 small things 

message: You can view deleted images with popups by going in an admin's deletion log and hovering the mouse over the link to the deleted image in the log. Then a thumbnail of the image will appear in the popup, but not when you click on the link. --GeorgeMoneyTalk  Contribs 02:37, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not in a position to say for sure but from my knowledge of how both Wikipedia and popups works I assume that's due to the caching that's done in various places between you and the server (I'm sure Lupin or someone else can pinpoint it better) so while you are correct, I doubt it will work with much older images that have already been flushed by the cache. Pegasus1138Talk | Contribs | Email ---- 02:57, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Your edit summary better have been a typo! Look at your edit summary for your reply to me. --GeorgeMoneyTalk  Contribs 04:37, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Err yeah, that was a typo. Pegasus1138Talk | Contribs | Email ---- 16:40, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Viewing deleted images 

message: How does one make use of the extended revert summary? I used to automatically be using the extended one until recently, and I can't find any option to do so listed on the popups page. Cowman109Talk 19:05, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd like to know this too.  More importantly, why was the extended summary which was present up until a week or two ago removed and replaced with the much less descriptive one? --Happynoodleboy 16:34, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended revert summary 

message: I don't use Popups but i have noticed a few times Nothing get's done 4 for edits.  A typical mistake is
#Vandalism
#rm Vandalism
#rv to last edit by Vandal
#Oops Sorry about that rv back once or trice
One example is  fallow history forward.  This is not a problem with an individual user but rather a problem with Popups because I have seen this several times by different users.  Popups should have some safeguard over double reverts such as an edit conflict or it could read the previous edit for keywords such as rv or rm or revert or remove or vandalism or vand or any other thing somebody might use for and edit summary.  this may make it harder to revert vandals who call their work vandalism or try to trick the system but those user's just be reverted by hand or a Popups could say are you sure you want to revert because it could be a double revert.--E-Bod 21:55, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone reported something similar happening on the german wikipedia, and it was a bug which I think I fixed. Let me know if you still see this happening now. Lupin|talk|popups 23:18, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong Revert (double revert & oops i did it again) 

message: Sometimes when I hover over a link to an article or the diff/last link I get the article's history instead. If I mouseout and mouseover again I still get the history instead of the article itself or the diff. SCHZMO ✍ 21:03, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah. Me too. --GeorgeMoney T·C 23:19, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'm getting this also.  When viewing my watchlist, I rollover (diff), and am somtimes shown the history instead.  In some cases, this corrects itself without having to move the cursor.  Sometimes it doesn't.  This is only a recent thing. PrometheusX303 23:02, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I am also having this problem. Naconkantari e|t||c|m 15:47, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Thanks for the bug reports. I think I have fixed this in the dev version, but I'm not certain. Please could you test it out? Lupin|talk|popups 23:15, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error? 

message: I have changed the default summary to "Revert to last version by %s dated %s", and enabled the prompt, and until a few days ago that worked fine. But now whenever I revert a page from the history, the summary in the pop-up window says "null", so I have to enter my own summary. Has something changed which has broken this? (This problem has always existed for reverting from the "Older revision" links at the top of the page, but now it seems happen whatever link is used). JRawle (Talk) 14:56, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This might be related to the problem I had at User_talk:Lupin#Extended_revert_summary_broken.3F. It might be that your edit summary is not the extended one, so it does not accept the second %s. Cowman109Talk 18:43, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, that seems to have fixed it from the history list. I see, now the summary contains correct UTC time instead of my local timezone. Reverting from the toplinks on the "Revision as of..." page still doesn't work, but I've already taught myself not to do that anyway! JRawle (Talk) 23:23, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What I use is customized summary and the revert prompt options together so that way I have the popup where I can change my summary (and hit cancel if I want to save it manually) while at the same time when the prompt comes up it displays my preferred edit summary by default so if I wanted to I could just hit enter.  It works perfectly. Pegasus1138Talk | Contribs | Email ---- 07:12, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Revert edit summaries broken

message: Try hovering over http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=C++.  Click it to see where it goes.  (Note that http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C++ goes to a different article entirely.) —Simetrical (talk • contribs) 05:51, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Did you see the third note on C? "Due to technical limitations, typing C++ in your browser may have redirected you here." --Closedmouth 06:58, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, but the popups don't redirect you there when that's where the link actually goes.  The popup is supposed to show a preview of what you'll see when you click the link, not an entirely different page.  I almost "corrected" the page on technical restrictions on naming to remove the problem with C++/C, because due to the (correct) popup I thought it was fixed.  Luckily I tried checking the actual page first. —Simetrical (talk • contribs) 21:03, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Thanks, this should be fixed in the dev version. Lupin|talk|popups 23:14, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bug: incorrect handling of + in URLs 

message: Since the toolserver is FUBARed for the forseeable future I suggest in addition to allowing the values kate and interiot for the edit counter option also adding Interiot2 as an accepted value which would point towards User:Interiot/Tool2/code.js, it uses the format http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Interiot/Tool2/code.js?username=Pegasus1138 for linking to users, where Pegasus1138 would be replaced with whatever the person's username is. Shouldn't be a hard thing to add. Pegasus1138Talk | Contribs | Email ---- 07:17, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you suggesting I add interiot's code so that every popup user has it automatically installed? As far as I can tell, without doing so, this won't work.  Lupin|talk|popups 23:16, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It won't work for those who don't have it installed no, but you can always include it as an option and either keep it as an unlisted option on the options listings page, or you can note on that page that to make Interiot's tool 2 work you need to install his js (the directions for which btw are on the same page as the the tool and show up if you don't have it). The latter could be somewhat confusing for people who don't know how to entirely work the js beyond copying and pasting code and the former hinders people knowing about the option but either way I think it should be at least be accepted as an option. Pegasus1138Talk | Contribs | Email ---- 23:45, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

text: I've added a custom edit counter option to the dev version. To use it, set popupEditCounter='custom' and popupEditCounterUrl='http://foo.bar.baz/path/to/tool?username=%s'. Lupin|talk|popups 00:47, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, I've tested it out but it still seems to be pointing me towards the default (Interiot's Tool on toolserver).  I'll try to fiddle with the option later to see if it's something in how I'm inputting it that's breaking it but I'm not sure which end the problem is on. Pegasus1138Talk | Contribs | Email ---- 03:08, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops, that should be popupEditCounterTool='custom'. Sorry! Lupin|talk|popups 03:18, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Still not working, odd, everything should work correctly... Feel free to edit my js file if it's something on my end and you think you can fix it but I have no idea what the issue is. Pegasus1138Talk | Contribs | Email ---- 02:00, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yup, my fault. I fixed the bug and your monobook.js now works for me. Lupin|talk|popups 03:13, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Works perfectly now, thanks, though I of course would prefer the toolserver version (handles users with high edit counts  better) to the tool2 version but we have to work what works I guess. Pegasus1138Talk | Contribs | Email ---- 19:37, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  suggestion 

message: My monobook.js page is here: User:Hdtopo/monobook.js
Do I have this installed right? Hdtopo 01:45, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, have you cleared your cache? --Closedmouth 02:23, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: How do I know which skin I'm using?  Maybe that's the problem.  Exploding Boy 03:40, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: One way to find out seems to be to go to a wikipedia page while logged in and type javascript:alert(skin) into your url bar and press enter. The boring way is to examine your user preferences under 'skin'. Lupin|talk|popups 03:54, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow, cool trick.  I'm surprised that trick hasn't been coded into any scripts yet and isn't more widely known. Pegasus1138Talk | Contribs | Email ---- 03:29, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  help 

message: Everytime I use the pop up tool I get an error warning which goes along the lines of:
"Navigational Popups error: op or cl is null! something is wrong."
What does this mean and what can I do to correct it? The pop up is not able to load a section of the page at all. - Erebus555 10:43, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I am also intermittently getting this error both at home (most of the time) and at work (only sometimes).  Both machines are running IE 6 with all of the latest patches and updates.  --Kralizec! (talk) 12:48, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe that this bug is now fixed. Please clear your cache very thoroughly and see if it disappears. By the way, this bug is an indication that you're running the development version, which is prone to catastrophic failure of this sort from time to time... so while I do appreciate the bug reports, if you want to use the more stable version you should change popupsdev to popups everywhere in your user js file. Lupin|talk|popups 14:03, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Getting error: op or cl is null

message: I don't know if this is feasable as I don't know how the script works, but could the 'summary' section that describes an image on wikipedia be displayed when you mousover a thumbnail of an image in an article? Right now you see a thumb of the image (usually smaller than the thumb you're hovering over), and several tool links, but it would be nice if the image's description (summary) would display under the tools (just like the intro paragraph of an article is displayed when hovering over a wikilink). Thanks TheHYPO 23:00, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Feasible, and even desirable. I'll put this on my todo list. Lupin|talk|popups 20:51, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Delayed response from me, but thanks - I just noticed this on an image today :) TheHYPO 06:06, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion: Popups over images 

message: I keep getting the two errors "Something odd happened" and "Something fishy happened". But when I try again, it keeps saying it. Any idea why? – Gurch 08:13, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No :) Is this still a problem? Lupin|talk|popups 20:45, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Something [odd|fishy] happened. Please try again. 

message: When you hover over a userpage link, it has an option "user". When you hover over that option, you see a link to "space", which links to http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Prefixindex&namespace=2&from=USERNAME  What would be better is if it linked to http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Prefixindex&namespace=2&from=USERNAME/  with a slash at the end. --GeorgeMoney T·C 01:38, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, I've put this in the dev version. Lupin|talk|popups 20:47, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Viewing a user's space 

message: Whenever I roll over a link that should give me a popup, it says ‘Unknown structure: shortmenus’. What is this error and can it be remedied? ~Chris {tce@} 20:15, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This error should disappear if you clear your cache thoroughly. Lupin|talk|popups 20:45, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I cleaned my cache, still giving me that error. I'm usiing Firefox 1.5.0.3 on WinXP Home SP2. ~Chris t c e @ 00:08, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Wtf. It works in IE7! ~Chris t.c.e.@ 00:52, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not working 

message: When you hover over a diff link, it doesn't show the edit summary and the editor. Is there some way to do that? --GeorgeMoney T·C 20:53, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not currently. Lupin|talk|popups 19:57, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diffs 

message: What is exact meaning of the item Preview diffs in watchlist, history and related changes. on WP:POPUP. I had hoped I could get a scaled down version of the diff just by moving the mouse over but get nothing like that (just a box with "editLast", etc). Could a picture be added what one should expected here? TIA Pavel Vozenilek 04:26, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Here you go. Lupin|talk|popups 04:45, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Preview in watchlist? 

message: I didn't know where to post this, but maybe someone smarter can move it into place for me.
A while ago, I added popups to my monobook.js, but they would not, um, pop up.  I finally discovered (through use of the javascript console), that my monobook.css was flawed.  Once I fixed it, the popups worked (almost) perfectly.  If anyone is having problems with popups, this may be the solution.--Max  Talk [ (add)] 23:56, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  CSS can cause problems 

message: Hey, just wanted to report some leaked code, via the the Firefox extension Leak Monitor. Here's the leaky section (from the extension's copy feature), lines 1207-1223:
 [+] [leaked object] (32daf28, http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Lupin/popups.js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript&dontcountme=s,  1207-1223) = function () {
    if (d.getReadyState() == 4) {
        delete pg.misc.downloadsInProgress[this.id];
        try {
            if (d.getStatus() == 200) {
                d.data = d.getData();
                d.lastModified = d.getLastModifiedDate();
                callback(d);
            } else {
                if (typeof onfailure == typeof 1) {
                    if (onfailure > 0) {
                        newDownload(url, id, callback, onfailure - 1);
                    }
                } else {
                    if (typeof onfailure == "function") {
                        onfailure(d, url, id, callback);
                    }
                }
            }
        } catch (somerr) {
        }
    }
 }
  [ ] prototype (20cea18) = [object Object]
Sorry it stretches the page. Don't know if you can make sense of that or what, but I hope it helps. — SheeEttin {T/C} 01:13, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, this is interesting. I think I read somewhere that a leak caused by incomplete xmlhttprequests was a known bug in firefox, so maybe that's what's going on here. Lupin|talk|popups 00:20, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leaked JS 

message: Lupin, I just encountered this odd popup behaviour on the Chile article. Everything after the link to the .ogg file appears bold in the popup (see screenshot), but is formatted correctly in the article itself. No big deal, but possibly a bug you may wish to iron out at some point. Keep up the good work on popups, thanks.  --Cactus.man ✍ 11:14, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hm, it's odd that IE behaved differently. Anyway, it should now work in the dev version, in firefox at least. I wonder if it's still working in IE...  Lupin|talk|popups 14:52, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: -) Fixed again, swiftly as usual, thanks. All is now fine in FF and still OK in IE. Don't ask me how, was it connected to the .ogg link, or was that just my imagination? --Cactus.man ✍ 15:05, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Kinda. By default, templates are removed from previews. The bug was caused by a   (like the ogg template) which became ', which InstaView doesn't like. The fix was to replace templates with a space instead of simply deleting them. Lupin|talk|popups 15:29, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Odd popup behaviour - caused by link to .ogg file???

message: I'd like to suggest a feature for popups: a reason field, especially for reverts. It's annoying when people revert an article with popups, and are unable to give a reason. I've been copying the link and appending a reason to my autosummaries to bypass this. — SheeEttin {T/C} 22:01, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Search for summaryprompt on WP:POP to see an easier way to do this. Lupin|talk|popups 00:21, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Ah, thanks. Now I'll have to read through the rest of those options and change the ones I want. ;) — SheeEttin {T/C} 20:49, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reason fields 

message: When I was making the archive, I saw a brief discussion where is was proposed that the edit summaries should refer to the previous editor (more recognizable) instead of the complicated edit version number.  The idea was rejected saying that using names was too unspecific, as editors could make multiple consecutive edits.  What if the summary included both the specific number and the more recognizable editor, such as VandalProof does? It says it all: "Reverted edits by (vandal) to version (version number) by (previous editor) using (tool)."  Why doesn't popups do that?  Just an idea. —Akrabbimtalk 22:11, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a good idea, and frequently suggested. It'll be done once the infrastructure is in place to do it efficiently via the query.php extension. Lupin|talk|popups 00:22, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

text: This has now been implemented in the dev version. Please test the hell out of it :-) Lupin|talk|popups 05:16, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit summaries:  version numbers as well as names? 

message: I noticed the word "draggable" in the code and can't figure out what it refers to, not from the code, the documentation, or a web search. The popup window itself cannot be dragged about. What can be dragged? Does it depend on OS/browser? I'm using IE on W2K today. — Hippietrail 23:44, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If you hold the shift key, then you can drag the popup around the screen. I've added a little note to this effect to the instructions page - thanks for pointing out that this was missing. Lupin|talk|popups 00:25, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow! That is an extremely helpful feature. Thanks a lot for implementing it. It will help for when popups spontaneously pop up on top of the edit window and make it a tad hard to see what I'm reading :). Cowman109Talk 00:35, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Why not use a more standard UI element like a title bar for this?  --Doradus 18:32, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There's no really good reason, I think... maybe I'll try this out. One thing is that it would probably stop people from copying any text that was in the title bar, although this is probably something worth sacrificing for a more intuitive interface. Lupin|talk|popups 00:41, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Draggable? 

message: When you get the popup for a username, there's a link to the user's edit count. This edit count uses a tool that's no longer accurate. It lists my edits at 1087, when I know from this version of the edit count tool that I'm at over 1200. The contribution tree link is also outdated. Could that be fixed? --Grace 03:48, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You can set up a custom edit counter - please see the instructions page (search for popupEditCounterTool). Lupin|talk|popups 12:11, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit counter 

message: When I use popups to revert, I get such edit summary: 'Revert to revision xxxxxxxx dated (unknown) by (unknown) using popups'. Why the date and previous editor are marked as an 'unknown'? How to change this edit summary into 'Revert to revision xxxxxxxx using popups' which I had before? Jacek Kendysz 23:03, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Firstly, is this still broken? Secondly, there is documentation about fiddling with edit summaries at WP:POP which I hope is not too confusing. Let me know if you're still having trouble. Lupin|talk|popups 12:11, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, this is still broken. I tried to change something in my monobook.js, but nothing changed with reverting. It seems that the cause of my problem is my browser - Opera 9. Jacek Kendysz 12:47, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You mean you still have (unknown) appearing, every time? That's strange. I just tested with Opera 9 (build 3447) on a mac, and I didn't get (unknown) in the edit summary when I tried reverting. Are you getting any javascript errors at all? Lupin|talk|popups 14:19, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I have it still, as you can see here. I'm not getting any errors. BTW, is my monobook.js ok? Jacek Kendysz 14:36, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Your monobook.js looks fine to me. I still have no idea what the problem could be. Could you try the dev version, by changing popups.js to popupsdev.js everywhere in that file? Also, which operating system are you using, and which build of opera? Do previews for history pages and user contributions work correctly for you? Lupin|talk|popups 15:07, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

text: popupsdev.js doesn't work also. My OS is Windows XP (SP2), and I use Opera 9 beta (build 8367). Here I don't see links to Larry Sanger's and Conversion script's contributions. This page seems to be ok. Jacek Kendysz 15:45, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Please could you post a screenshot for the popup you get here? Is the issue perhaps that those lines are off the bottom of the screen? You can shift-drag the popup upwards if so, or scroll the page downwards. Lupin|talk|popups 19:32, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Another thing: I think opera 9 final has been released. Maybe you could try with the latest version. Lupin|talk|popups 19:35, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

text: OK, your tool works on Opera 9. Thanks. Jacek Kendysz 10:58, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit summary - problem with reverting 

message: It appears that popups does not recognize articles tagged with  as being disambiguation pages.  Examples: HMS Glowworm, USS Enterprise.  Is this a feature or bug?  :-)  --Kralizec! (talk) 21:00, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Each disambig template has to be listed in the script. I'll add shipindex to the list. Lupin|talk|popups 12:11, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Articles with ''shipindex'' template not recognized as disambiguation 

message: the Article History page, in Firefox or IE. Means I can't revert using Popups. Known problem? If not, what info do I need to give? --kingboyk 21:10, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Is it still broken? Do you see any javascript errors? (Turn on javascript debugging in the IE options, and look at the javascript console (in the tools menu) in firefox). Lupin|talk|popups 12:11, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ha! It was still broken, but snooping around in the JS error console I discovered it was a different script (User:Voice_of_All/History/monobook.js) causing the problem. Disabled that and Popups are working again. Thanks for the response and sorry for not working it out sooner! :) --kingboyk 12:28, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  No longer working in... 

message: I mentioned this on the talk page for Lupin's code, but his contribs suddenly stop a little else than a week ago, so I'll ask here--would it be okay to use the popup code on a wiki associated with an online game?  And if so, how do i need to adapt it?--Mobius Soul 17:27, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it's OK. See WP:POPFAQ for (possibly inadequate) instructions. Lupin|talk|popups 12:11, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Did you see the instructions at the bottom of WP:POPFAQ? I suspect that you'll have to supply siteArticlePath and/or siteBotInterfacePath functions, based on what you say. I've tried an installation in the site-wide monobook.js, and it works for me. If your wiki is publically accessible, I could take a look... Lupin|talk|popups 21:09, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I did follow those instructions for using them on a user-by-user basis, and that's what's giving me the partial functionality, i.e., only working for red-links. I'll spend some more time making sure I followed it exactly; I know I had PATHA and PATHB in there at some point, but I don't think they currently are. I'll try again, more carefully and more thoroughly, and report back. Thanks for the help. B.Mearns*, KSC 16:49, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I expect it's a problem with the PATHA. Lupin|talk|popups 22:35, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You are absolutely correct, thank you. I was just using the wrong value for PATHA. I corrected it, and it worked, and I was also able to add it to MediaWiki:monobook.js and made it site wide. Thanks for the help, and the great plugin. B.Mearns*, KSC 12:04, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Other wikis

message: Soo...I'm back.  With the release of the stable Opera 9.0, I eagerly downloaded it and turned popups on again.  And it works!  Kind of...I'm happy to say that Opera doesn't crash, but I am missing functionality.  See here  for detail - it just says "actions" and "popups".  If I click it, it is merely a # link; that is, if I'm at WP:POP and I hover over a link, it will read WP:POP#.  I just checked IE and it has all the functionaity I remember having.  So...what are you doing, Opera, and can this be fixed? Hbdragon88 19:57, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Erm, the best place to ask this is on the Opera forums. And there is a likely possibility that it isn't Opera's fault, but the popup's fault for using improper scripting that Opera refuses to support. 203.218.88.186 11:03, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

text: See WP:POPFAQ#Menus don't work. Lupin|talk|popups 12:11, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: LOL...Opera is not CSS-compilant enough...get a more modern brwoser...good stuff.  Nonwithstanding Opera's dedication and compliance through all versions.  The funny thing, though, is that it somehow regressed - I got the menus just fine in 8.54, but don't get them in 9.0. Hbdragon88 17:02, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  More Opera problems 

message: Why if you hover over this link using popups it links to the article for the letter "B", but if you click it it links to Bad Title?
:Works for me. Which browser? Lupin|talk|popups 12:11, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Firefox 1.5.0.4 . --GeorgeMoney (talk) (Help Me Improve!) 01:54, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, I see the problem now. I'll think about the best way to deal with this. Lupin|talk|popups 11:35, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Do you have a link exhibiting this behaviour? I see brokenness (the diff I'm seeing is not a diff at all), but not this problem exactly. I'll investigate when I get the time. Lupin|talk|popups 12:11, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

text: This problem is double-headed: there's a bug in mediawiki which I've patched (but hasn't gone live yet), and a bug in popups.js which has now been fixed. Lupin|talk|popups 22:43, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bug? 

message: When I'm editing a page and highlight an internal link, then hover over the highlighted link (in edit mode) or do something to it (cut, copy, or delete), a popup appears for the link. Is it normal to have popups in edit mode? SCHZMO ✍ 23:15, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see WP:POPFAQ. Lupin|talk|popups 23:34, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Popups in edit mode? 

message: Are they? I've been seeing the old version (I kinda liked the old ones anyway, since I use Opera.) for a few hours. Pacific Coast Highway (blah • lol, internet) 05:58, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Menus don't really work in Opera, so by default another structure is used. Check out the popupStructure option for more choices here. Lupin|talk|popups 13:16, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok. Nice work with the tools, keep it up. :) Pacific Coast Highway (blah • lol, internet) 22:24, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are the old one's back? 

message: How hard would it be to make the little thumbs in the popups to link to the picture's description page?  It would just remove one step to getting to it. If it would be too cumbersome to add to everybody's, is there code I could add to my monobook.js to have it work for me? —Akrabbimtalk 19:18, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added this to the dev version. There's a new option, popupThumbAction which defaults to 'imagepage'. Other possible values are 'sizetoggle' and 'linkfull'. Lupin|talk|popups 21:03, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to picture 

message: I just started fixing occurrences of Microsoft Word using popups, and I got through a half dozen before I realized that it was substituting the redundant Microsoft Word.  Would it be feasible to have the popups detect that the resulting link alias is redundant and remove it?  I imagine it might not be easy to do.  --Doradus 16:04, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a good idea. I've added this to the dev version. Lupin|talk|popups 22:36, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing trivial link aliases 

message: I've tried everything I could reasonably conceive of (like a negative value for “popupTimeOffset=-2”), without any luck. In “My prefernces – Time zone – Offset” is set to “02:00” (changing that had no effect on popups.js anyway). I'm using Firefox 1.5.0.4, and don't suspect the problem there. Perhaps someone might like to take a look, and recognize what I'm doing wrong: “de:Benutzer:ParaDox/monobook.js”. -- ParaDox 10:00, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think popupTimeOffset is obselete and won't work. You should get nice UTC timestamps automatically now, but I see that this is not what's required in de (since the history pages don't display UTC for some reason). I'll think about a solution. Lupin|talk|popups 14:57, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for looking and thinking about it. UTC wouldn't bother me at all, but not everyone here sees it that way, so a solution would be very helpful, considering that reverting itself causes more than enough irritation anyway ;)  Apart from that, I find popups.js wonderful. -- ParaDox 02:49, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can't get local date/time in summary to work 

message: First, I want to congratulate Lupin for this piece of work! However, for some reasons, when I hover over an articles name (inside my watchlist), altough it shows the popus (with different links: last edit...history... editors... un/watch, etc...), when I hover again over these links, a new popup (inside the old one) does not appear. is that normal, or is it because I might of spoiled my monobook.js??? Do you know what I mean? I would like, for example, that when I hover over lastEdit, for a new popup to show me what are the diffs, and not having to click on the link (which naturally opens a new window). Anybody? greier 14:21, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, this isn't expected to work. The navigation links do not produce subpopups; in some cases, this would be tricky, in other cases, easier. You should see subpopups on wikilinks in the previews, though. Lupin|talk|popups 14:58, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I can see those.. Thank for the reply! Would of been nice for that to work too... Still good job on doing this! But a new question :D I see some mentioned reverting using popups: how is this done? In the navigation links I have no revert link...  18:56, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There are some (brief) instructions buried somewhere in WP:POP, and I've expanded on these at WP:POPFAQ. Lupin|talk|popups 03:42, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! 12:07, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

text: I like your original request, so I've added it to the dev version. You only get subpopups on some of the links, though, like history, talk page etc (not lastEdit, for example). Lupin|talk|popups 22:40, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Popups inside popups

message: Could someone please look at my install and tell me what I did wrong. It is at the end of my monobook.js file. I am not getting anything.—Lady Aleena talk/contribs 23:02, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't see anything. Did you remember to empty your cache after changing it? -- He Who Is[ Talk ] 00:43, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  A little help 

message: Popup says that an article is a stub even if :Template:Tl is used with a stub template or if the stub template is in nowiki tags. For example, it says Wikipedia:Template substitution is a stub when it really isn't, since the page uses . Is there a way to fix this? --Schzmo 15:45, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It occurs to me that maybe the only valid stubs lie in the main namespace, and all of the invalid stubs that you're talking about don't. Maybe I should just count stub templates in the main namespace? Or do you see a problem with that? Lupin|talk|popups 01:30, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

text: I've now implemented this feature. Lupin|talk|popups 22:34, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stubs 

message: Could someone help me, I deletd the script from User:Myrtone86/monobook.js, the popups still remained, then I read the intruction and so went back and tried deleting my browser's (Safari) cache, it still didn't work, so I put the script back in and removed it and deleted my broweser's cache, but  still nothing happened. Myrtone (☏):-o
:I've added some instructions to the FAQ to address this. Lupin|talk|popups 01:29, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Annoying popups 

message: Whenever an article has a section stub (), in popups it shows the article as a stub.  I suggest you make it say "Section Stub" insted of "Stub" for such cases.  Here is an example: , as you can see, in popups it shows as a Stub --Mini-Geek 12:36, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, this is a good idea. I've added this to the dev version. Lupin|talk|popups 15:43, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section Stubs 

message: how do I use popups to disambiguate? Zythe 02:28, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Set popupFixDabs=true, hover over a link to a disambiguation page and look for the green links at the bottom of the popup. Lupin|talk|popups 04:26, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Awesome, thanks. Zythe 13:06, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stupid question... 

message: I've tried the code, and it doesn't seem to work. Can someone please send a message to my talk page explaining, cheers —Minun Spiderman 15:38, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see the FAQ. Lupin|talk|popups 22:33, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error 

message: Popups aren't working for me on my own MediaWiki. I followed the instructions in the FAQ, adding to my LocalSettings.php the following:
 $wgAllowUserJs  = true;
 $wgAllowUserCss = true;
and I added this to my monobook.js:
 document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="'
              + 'http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Lupin/popups.js'
              + '&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript&dontcountme=s"></script>');
 
 popupUseQueryInterface=false;
Now, with each page load, in my JavaScript Console (Firefox) I get the error:
'addOnloadHook is not defined' and it points me to line 68 of popups.js on wikipedia.org.
Let me know if I can help further debug. —mjb 21:39, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Which version of mediawiki are you running? addOnloadHook should be defined in wikibits.js; maybe it's absent from very old versions. Lupin|talk|popups 22:26, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Using popups on other MediaWikis 

message: Okay, this is an awesome tool. It makes it so much easier to revert! -- TheGreatLlama (speak to the Llama!) 01:00, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I second that! --KeithB 19:04, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pure awesomeness 

message: Hi,
I could be really great, if someone could add a link to the "mark as patrolled" page when previewing diffs from watchlist and recentchanges (when rcid is present, that is). I should be very simple and doable, and would help patrolling admins a lot (like me on dawiki). Thanks in advance. --Morten Barklund  [ talk / contribs ] 11:45, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added this feature to the dev version. Enjoy! Lupin|talk|popups 13:49, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have! (enjoyed, that is :-) But the option "mark patrolled" is not available for a new article if subsequent edits have been made.--Manscher 21:02, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

text:  (Suggestion: A really cool feature would be to mark a series of edits as patrolled; often a user has made e.g. six edits, and these can be shown as one compound edit by popups, but not marked patrolled because of the many edits. But now I'm just being greedy :-) --Manscher 21:02, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mark as patrolled from popup 

message: I think that there should be a popupFixDabAutoClick option that would do the same thing for dab fixes as popupRedirAutoClick does for redir fixes.  Also, both should have an option to somehow choose on-the-fly which to do, either in the menu, or to have another option that doesn't automatically do any of the others. Thanks for all the work on popups, Lupin, it really helps when fixing dab pages. --Mini-Geek 13:32, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  popupFixDabAutoClick and popupRedirAutoClick 

message: Hi Lupin,
Could you please add Special:Linksearch to your popups on External Links?
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALinksearch&target=URL
It'd be great for uncovering all the articles where a spammer with multiple accounts may have hidden their URLs in.
Cheers,   Netsnipe  (Talk)  06:59, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Linksearch 

message: Is it possible to add an extra link to the actions menu? I'd like to have a link to Interiot's what links here tool, but can I add it using options or is it only possible by changing the code itself? --Erwin85 21:02, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Currently, only by changing the code. Lupin|talk|popups 10:06, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Shouldn't it be possible to add a config option like var popups_extra = "link1|link2|link3"; and have a split() in the code? --69.236.22.166 20:17, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extra links 

message: Hello,
When I set popupRevertSummaryPrompt=true; , and then try reverting a page, I still don't get given the chance to change the summary - so I presume that this is a bug? Hope you can fix this soon. Madder 22:12, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, it seems to be working now! :-) Madder 21:33, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bug with popupRevertSummaryPrompt - doesn't work 

message: Hi, I managed to install popups for another wiki and it manages to work for practically everything except for when I hover my mouse over diff or revision links. It works for me on Wikipedia though, was wondering if there was some option I had to set to get this right? Oh, and thanks for the great tool! :P --Wonglkd 03:33, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see WP:POPFAQ. Lupin|talk|popups 10:04, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  popup for diff links on other wikis 

message: This is a great tool. Can it be used to fix double redirects after a page move? When I try to use the "bypass redirects" option on , it instead tries to edit the new page. --NE2 06:33, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Bypassing double redirects

message: I started using popups a few days ago, and have had it crash my browser several times. On occasion, after the initial popup shows, and during the lag while the content is being grabbed, my browser goes "hourglass", and the IE process has to be killed. The version of IE I am using is 6.0.2900.2180.xpsp_sp2_gdr.050301-1519. Crockspot 14:16, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crashing IE 6 

message: I feel completely ridiculous asking this question, but how do I turn the popups back on when I've hit the "disable popups" button? <FONT FACE="Amelia BT">Laurənwhisper</FONT> 02:34, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Reload the page. Lupin|talk|popups 06:40, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  disable popups 

message: Hi Lupin, First: Kudos for popups; really an excellent tool. Now my question: The Danish Wikipedia has changed the names of the talkspaces; see list here. Popups still uses the old talkspace names. Are these taken from a list (which then needs to be updated), or is it loaded dynamically, in which case my question is how to reaload them? --Manscher 20:57, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The names are hard-coded into the script and need to be updated. Thanks for pointing out the change - I'll fix it in the next update. Lupin|talk|popups 06:42, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Namespace changes 

message: I'm trying to use some of the configuration parameters for example popupRevertSummary and I must be doing something wrong.  I added this:
 popupRevertSummary='Reverted vandalism';
just as a test, and did the shift-reload trick to load the new version into the cache, but the edit summary hasn't changed.  What am I doing wrong?--Bookgrrl 17:39, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Try changing popupQueriedRevertSummary instead. (I admit that these options are hopelessly confusing). Lupin|talk|popups 05:21, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Beautiful!! That did it, thanks... --Bookgrrl 14:46, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Configuration not working 

message: Is it possible to install the source of popups.js on another Mediawiki installation?  When I create a popups.js subpage and paste the code in, it comes out messed up and appends a LOT of garbage to the header of every page on my site until I remove it.  I'm pasting it directly from the source at User:Lupin/popups.js, but it's not surrounded by that neat code box on my wiki like it is in your subpage. --Neurophyre(talk) 04:43, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, please see WP:POPFAQ. Lupin|talk|popups 05:19, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Local copies on other wikis 

message: If there are hidden comments on a dab page, and the comments contain apparent wikilinks, the wikilinks get picked up as possible dabs.  I don't have an example in a live page, but you can see the effect in this historical version of Castor (78804524),  If you have FixDabs enabled, and you hover over that link, the list of dabs will include "calorimeter" and "dry cask storage", but if you go look at the link, you won't see those listed.  It seems like anything inside a comment should really be ignored.  (I admit that this is probably not something that comes up very often.)  Xtifr tälk 03:53, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  hidden comments scanned 

message: When previewing a diff link, it would be useful if the popups showed the author of the old and current revisions. This will make it easy to see if if there have been more changes since the last time you looked at the article. It will also make it easy to see that someone has made multiple revisions and that what you are seeing is not the full extent of their changes. So instead of
:New revision	2006-10-09 11:47:28
:Old revision	2006-10-09 11:37:55
It would display
:New revision	2006-10-09 11:47:28 by SMC
:Old revision	2006-10-09 11:37:55 by Winhunter
Ideally linking to the user pages of registered users and the contribs of anons. Thryduulf 11:57, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good idea - going onto the TODO list. Thanks! Lupin|talk|popups 21:25, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  show authors on diff popups 

message: At first blush, it appears that rutabaga is not a disambiguation page.  However, popups gives me the option to disambiguate links to it.  Is this a feature I do not understand, or is it a bug of some sort?  --Kralizec! (talk) 00:18, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  False disambiguation report? 

message: Hi, I have the same issue that Madder had before.  I set popupRevertSummaryPrompt=true and then cached my browser; yet, I don't get the chance to change summary again.  Is it a bug or an individual problem that's in my monobook.js? —Mirlen 21:51, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert summary 

message: This is a good Idea I finally got it working-_SeadogTalk 14:07, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Works Good 

message: Hi there, I use the popups a lot, and not just to revert vandalism. My question is if it's possible to make it so that when you revert a page, you can have the "minor edit" box ticked as well. Thanks, and I really appreciate this great tool! --Kyoko 18:51, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I second this request, and I'd like all reverts to be marked 'minor' by default, as that's what the sysop rollback link does as well. Jayden54 22:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  possible to click "minor edit"? 

message: In firefox, increase the text size and then mouse over Pneumonoultramicroscopicsilicovolcanoconiosis  —Disavian (talk/contribs) 03:14, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rendering bug 

message: On Special:Watchlist popups don't work and sometimes  style links render inside the edit box when editing the page. Lcarsdata (Talk) 18:23, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  2 things 

message: I don't want to test this out on a page for fear of reverting improperly... I know that when I'm on my watchlist, and I push the "revert" link on a popup, it reverts that most recent change. But let's say I'm on the page history. Do I hover over the version I want to revert to, and push the revert on THAT popup? Or do I hover over the version that needs to be reverted? --Wolf530 17:15, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You hover of the version you want to revert to and push revert on that popup. If you want to test it, use the sandbox. Jayden54 22:36, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Using revert 

message: Problems occur when encountering with direct links (i.e. links with URLs in the format of http://XX.wikipedia.org/wiki/PAGENAME) with such kind of characters. In the Popups tooltip, the links to these kind of pages won't be displayed properly, and such links will lead you to the pages with the wrongly displayed names as their titles (so as their corresponding URLs). Such pages do not exist, obviously, and so the previews in the tooltips report "Empty Page"s.  A similar behaviour could also be seen from the internal links in the previews of the tooltips (in, of course, those manage to have their pages found correctly), although the titles are displayed wrongly in a different way.
Note that the above problems do not exist in other kinds of links (such as History, Difference between revisions, etc.)
Hope this could be fixed asap, thanks!
--Moonian 03:07, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  About Direct Links with Non-alphanumeric Characters 

message: One more: I could not yet find a rollback link for diff popups, even with popupAdminLinks = true;. Would it be possible to implement that, is it intentionally, or am I blind :-)
Cacycle 23:05, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, there's no admin-style rollback since edit tokens make this a little complicated. Lupin|talk|popups 22:56, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rollback 

message: Is it possible for the link to ignore edit page links? Especially the character/content insert link? losing the popups over the template list would not be that bad since half the time the rendering is more or less mangled anyway. Circeus 21:39, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Which links do you mean? The links in the box following the line ending "... It will be deleted." don't give popups for me. Lupin|talk|popups 22:58, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  ignore insert links? 

message: Is it possible to make popups appear when I hover over the redlink of a deleted image that goes to Special:Upload? It would be nice to have a link to the image's deletion log (and perhaps an undelete link) in the popup instead of having to cut and paste the image name to find out why it was deleted. Kusma (討論) 14:08, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image deletion log for Special:Upload links?