lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:I'm Eighteen

message: Nobody knows what the B-side of this single was? Murderbike 17:21, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  B-side 

message: The spanish band Sex Museum has a cover of this song in his album "Independence".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.77.128.4 (talk) 10:19, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  more covers 

message: How is this song 'psychedelic'? Rock, yes; hard rock, yes, yes. But I just don't see trails when I listen to it - and there are no citations for any of the genres, BTW. Radiopathy •talk•   01:32, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a common problem, uncited genres. Anyways, I agree with you and have changed. Doctorhawkes (talk) 03:58, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre 

message: There seems to be confusion about the name of the song. 
Is it, 'Eighteen', as displayed on the label of the 45 RPM disc in the image, or is it 'I'm Eighteen' as stated in the text and title of the page?
(hoping I've done this ok.. first time here)
StarGehzer (talk) 01:54, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Song Title 

message: I just skimmed through the article, and I think that it has way too much information to be a stub. I think it is at least C-Class. Mind if I update the article’s status? KevinML (talk) 10:49, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stub?
Talk:Rui da Silva (DJ)

message: :"At the time, he was the only Portuguese musician to have a UK hit, and hence was the first to score a UK number one." 
Huh? Was he the only Portuguese EVER to have a UK hit (and hence the first number one)? Or was he the only one "at the time", the much weaker statement that the first clause actually makes? This should be changed to either "He was the only Portuguese musician ever to have a UK hit, and hence was the first to score a UK number one." or "At the time, he was the only Portuguese musician to have a UK hit, and he was the first ever to score a UK number one." You know, whichever is true.  And verifiable with citations.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.123.89.93 (talk) 19:34, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  First Portuguese musician on the the UK charts? 

message: Hello,
I have had a similar query regarding the claim of "First Portuguese musician on the UK charts". This is an ambiguous statement and required a citation to clarify and verify its truthfulness, and so I have added a "citation needed" tag to indicate this. Denihox (talk) 04:30, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation needed at the last sentence of the first paragraph 
Talk:I'm on Fire

message: Just wanted to add the cover by robins wife in the movie Pig 2021 2601:444:C200:45F0:0:0:0:1976 (talk) 01:51, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pig
Talk:I'm Sorry (Brenda Lee song)

message: The reference to Alley Oop as the preceding Billboard single goes to Alley Oop the comic strip instead of the song.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.98.147.130 (talk) 16:01, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: According to Discogs.com, the song "I'm sorry" was released as a B side only. That true? -andy 92.229.249.55 (talk) 12:07, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  B side?
Talk:I'm the Only One

message: Is this song not Etheridge's biggest hit?  From this chart, it looks like it, but the article just says, "one of her biggest."  --Allen (talk) 17:35, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: biggest hit?
Talk:If This Is It (Huey Lewis and the News song)

message: The video actually does spoof Jaws in the last few seconds (after the guy has walked away with the girl in the black bikini, the family who has been carrying their stuff all around the beach flops down in exhaustion, and a fin is seen moving through the sand...). AnonMoos (talk) 02:27, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Video
Talk:Is She Really Going Out with Him?

message: Shouldn't this page concentrate on the original version? It seems very oddly structured to concentrate on one obscure cover version. Angmering (talk) 12:00, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Cover

message: It seems implausible that the title of this song isn't a reference to the line spoken at the start of The Shangri-La's unimpeachable "Leader of the Pack", but obviously citations are necessary. A cursory search through Google Books turns up a mention of page 120 of Leaders of the Pack: Girl Groups of the 1960s and Their Influence on Popular Culture in Britain and America by Sean MacLeod. This statement is itself footnoted, though unfortunately Google Books doesn't have a preview of that particular part of the bibliography. Does anyone have access to the book, and indeed the book it cites? --IslandHopper 973 21:43, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Leader of the Pack" 
Talk:Is That All There Is?

message: The section on the context of the song does not fit the tone of the rest of the article.
Agreed?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.241.21.27 (talk) 15:48, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This section is little more than questions and speculations.  While it is interesting and raises some engaging points, it is partially written in first-person and is not encyclopedic at all.  The opening is not only an awkward run-on sentence, but why is the popularity of the song "an obvious question" that "must be asked"?  Also it's not a mystery why the arrangement sounds like a Brecht/Weill-style cabaret song - it's apparent that that was Randy Newman's intent.
Finwailin (talk) 17:36, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Instrumentation, Lyrical Origins, and American Social Context Section 

message: are Jerry Leiber's wife Gaby Rodgers' biographical details needed?
she introduced Leiber to Thomas Mann, and one of Mann's work inspired the song, it seems.
imagine if you every Wikipedia tell us not only the source of every inspiration, but also the history of the person who introduced them to that source of inspiration.
the article should simply say that Leiber was inspired by the Mann work, and leave it at that.
04:20, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  are Jerry Leiber's wife Gaby Rodgers' biographical details needed? 
Talk:It's Been Awhile

message: "The song is about singer Aaron Lewis's life and about how it's been a while since he's done a lot of things."  Embarassing.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 161.149.63.203 (talk) 16:07, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: The Worst Sentence In All of Wikipedia
Talk:Brasero (software)

message: The removal of the criticism section, deleting both positive and negative responses to this software has left the article far less complete than it was before. There is nothing in WP:Crit that limits the amount of criticism, it is just required to be properly sourced, which it is. If you feel that the criticism section is longer than the rest of the body of the article that just indicates that the rest of the article needs expansion. Removing all criticism makes it look like the article has been edited by people with a COI to protect the subject of the article. Please keep in mind that the aim of Wikipedia is to build an encyclopedia, deleting whole sections of an article and making it read more like an advertisement for the software makes the article weaker, not better and more likely to be AfDed as spam. I have restored the deleted sections. I believe that the best way to make this article better is to add more to the body and perhaps trim down the criticism section quotes, as needed. I have also removed the tags as the article has been copyedited for grammar and comprehension and with the criticism section re-instated, does meet WP's quality standards. If you disagree with this then please discuss here rather than reverting once again. - Ahunt (talk) 12:52, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed the criticism section and added some new text and refs, integrating the previous quotes into the new history section instead. See what you think. - Ahunt (talk) 13:43, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of criticism section

message: Brasero is the default CD/DVD application in Ubuntu and Xubuntu as well as in the GNOME desktop. Mentioning this is a fact, but the form of mentioning it implies that Ubuntu and Xubuntu are something like GNOME (for those that are not familiar with FOSS). Thus I would suggest something like : Brasero is the default CD/DVD Burner application in GNOME desktop, and as a consequence in major Linux Distibutions like Ubuntu and Fedora. Ppapadeas (talk) 18:17, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That does malke sense to mention that it is the default CD creator in any distro that uses GNOME, which would be expected, but it it would not be expected in a distro that does not use GNOME, like the Xfce-based Xubuntu, so perhaps that is worth mentioning. - Ahunt (talk) 19:30, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Clarification on Default status
Talk:Operator (band)

message: Operator is a relatively unknown band, but it has gained recent attention because of the single "Soul Crusher" and the fact that the lead singer sounds like Chris Cornell. If you find more information, please share it.Soholo 08:06, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

message: "Johnny Strong, sounds very similar to Chris Cornell."
That's like saying Mary-Kate Olsen bears a striking resemblence to Ashley Olsen.
Jack Meihoffer 01:27, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misleading statement.
Talk:2002 Florida gubernatorial election

message: Why is this article nominated for speedy deletion as "patent nonsense"?  Seems OK to me although it needs more content.  --Richard 08:12, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Kishoreganj Upazila

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://en.banglapedia.org/index.php?title=Kishoreganj_Upazila_(Nilphamari). Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Rubbish computer (talk) 22:13, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Saidpur Upazila

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://en.banglapedia.org/index.php?title=Saidpur_Upazila. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Sminthopsis84 (talk) 22:22, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Pemmasani Timmanayudu I

message: Hi! Please add facts, only with credible sources i.e. online resources or physical reference books. Thanking You, AltruismTo talk 08:31, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Any relation to Ramalinganayaka, Sri Krishna Deva Raya's general? --AltruismTo talk 09:06, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pemmasani Ramalinganayaka
Talk:Gangachara Upazila

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://en.banglapedia.org/index.php?title=Gangachara_Upazila. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Worldbruce (talk) 16:06, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Makineni Basavapunnaiah

message: Hi! Please add facts, only with credible sources i.e. online resources or physical reference books. Thanking You, AltruismTo talk 08:33, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Pirganj Upazila, Rangpur

message: kobi kazi Hayat Mamud .He was fames poet of middle bangoli leitraty & One of the gretest saint Of north banla.He laterary works arer Ambiya Bani,Hitogyan Bani,Shorboved bani & Jongonama.He was present in 17th century.He is graveyard is at Zarbisla in pirgonj under rangpur district.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.30.36.55 (talk) 20:26, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: pirganj onlin 017054244  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.229.84.150 (talk) 07:18, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Internet  

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://pirgonj.rangpur.gov.bd/site/page/b363d8b7-18fd-11e7-9461-286ed488c766/%E0%A6%AA%E0%A7%8D%E0%A6%B0%E0%A6%96%E0%A7%8D%E0%A6%AF%E0%A6%BE%E0%A6%A4%20%E0%A6%AC%E0%A7%8D%E0%A6%AF%E0%A6%95%E0%A7%8D%E0%A6%A4%E0%A6%BF%E0%A6%A4%E0%A7%8D%E0%A6%AC. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Worldbruce (talk) 01:24, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Belkuchi Upazila

message: I propose that Al-Aman Bahela Khatun Mosque be merged into Belkuchi Upazila. 
All available sources about the mosque were published on the occassion of its innauguration, and all say basically the same things about it. Per WP:GNG#Notes, despite minor variations, one story does not constitute multiple works for the purpose of establishing notability, even if published by multiple newspapers. So the topic does not satisfy WP:GNG or WP:GEOFEAT, and should not be a stand alone article.
Merging to Belkuchi Upazila is an alternative to deletion that would allow the topic to be spun out again into a stand alone article if and when it has gained sufficiently significant attention by the world at large and over a period of time to demonstrate notability. --Worldbruce (talk) 00:36, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It is a new mosque so the News of the inauguration of this mosque has been published by all the media. Although the mosque is new, it is a significant mosque in Bangladesh. I think this registration follows Wikipedia's policy. Maruf Hossain (talk) 07:59, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Judging from the sources in the article, it seems like it could be notable. The article doesn't really discuss why this mosque is "significant". If the article were expanded, there would be less question of notability. MB 14:13, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Kazipur Upazila

message: If "Ideal Village" is a concept, it needs explaining, or linking to a relevant article. (I believe thee is such a thing as an government-based Ideal Village Scheme). However, if it is simply a peacock word, it needs deleting. Parkywiki (talk) 12:20, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ideal Village?
Talk:Lee McCall

message: AUTHOR'S COMMENT: I HAVE SOURCES FOR THIS ARTICLE, I JUST DON'T HAVE THE TIME TO ENTER THE BIBLIOGRAPHY/FOOTNOTE RIGHT NOW, BUT I WILL SHORTLY. I'VE ADDED A 'THIS ARTICLE NEEDS TO CITE SOURCES/REFERENCES' NOTE IN THE MEANTIME, BUT I KNOW THAT IT NEEDS TO BE DONE AND I HAVE THEM READY, I JUST NEED TO FORMAT/ADD THEM. THE SAME IS TRUE OF HIS BIO-BOX, AND SOME OTHER DETAILS AND FORMATTING.Srajan01 08:37, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Haripur Upazila

message: Both the village Mednisagor & Mednisagor high school are located in haripur upazila . There is an old mosque called 'Mednisagor Jame Masjid' .  Robiulislamg (talk) 10:38, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mednisagor high school is one of the schools
Talk:Surface lift

message: It seems all of these surface lift articles are pretty similar and all pretty short.  I don't see any great potential for expanding them... why not merge them all here? Jpp42 08:38, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They probably would make a fine combined article, though the histories of each probably have not so much in common, and that would tend to make the combined article a bit unwieldy.  The magic carpet seems less of a fit with the others:  it seems like it should be the last to be folded in.  —EncMstr 01:27, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I was wondering about surface lifts used in the early days of skiing that are not mentioned anywhere on Wiki? Would the history of their evolution from how lifts started to where they are now be relevent? Lifts I'm thinking of are ones I know of personally such as the Ski Escalator at Mt Baker or the Talley-Ho Skiboggan at Snoqualmie Pass. There were others in the east coast of train type lifts and so forth.  Thoughts?Mrhyak (talk) 01:10, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger? 

message: The section on T- and J-bar lifts suggests that they are similar except for the shape of the bar. I am old enough to have used J-bar lifts and I can tell you that they are fundamentally different from any T-bar lift I have ever used. Every T-bar lift I have ever used has had some sort of spring mechanism, either a rope on a spring-loaded spool or a coil spring built into the shaft of the tee. The J-bar lifts I have been on had no spring at all. The jay was a heavy metal bar connected to the overhead cable solely by a hinge. The swinging of the jay provided the only "give". Consequently J-bar lifts operated at lower speeds and had to be further slowed down by the operator to give younger skiers a chance of embarking. Jdthood (talk) 21:24, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  J-bar 

message: See Talk:Ski_lift#Merge_with_Surface_lift for the discussion. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:18, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Only two people responded in two months, both opposed. I closed the merge proposal. - DavidWBrooks (talk) 21:08, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[ski lift]]
Talk:Consumer organization

message: Protection against abuse (see lead section) seems a rather narrow scope. For example, ANEC represents consumers in standardisation, so it is also a consumer organisation. BEUC could also be listed here; it appears to be a lobbying organisation that tries to influence the decision-making process. --ChristopheS (talk) 13:04, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition too narrow? 

message: Poland Federacja Konsumentów www.federacja-konsumentow.org.pl
62.87.227.215 (talk) 11:31, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  please update 

message: The term "consumer organization" is arguably a weasel word, as various groups seek different methods and solutions to differently perceived consumer issues, and can turn into ideological lobbying organization, e.g. the Consumer Union, while masquerading as something as innocuous as the BBB. The definition of "consumer" and the sense of "advocacy" is so elastic that quasi-political rent-seekers can fall under the term.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.72.74.25 (talk) 03:32, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs criticism section