Talk:The Elder Scrolls IV: Knights of the Nine

message: I was under the impression that there was one for the 360 yet I've been unable to locate one and the article makes no mention of one. does one exist? as well as if there is/isn't one is it worth mentioning? Quabarrick 01:44, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  is there a 360 retail box? 

message: Can someone actually confirm, and change to reflect, what currency is being talked about? --Dayn 11:58, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prices 

message: because this is just a plug in and not an actual expansion, i purpose merging this with the Oblivion page.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.78.202.2 (talk • contribs) 
:That makes sense to me. What do other editors think? CWC(talk) 08:00, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Makes sense to me too, except that there is also a proposition to merge Umaril The Unfeathered with this.  If that merge happens, then this article should stand on its own.  It should also stand on its own if the information in the Umaril article that is extraneous there but would fit here is moved. VoidTalker 18:52, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  And to that the fact that this is an actual mini-expansion and not simply a plugin, it makes sense to give this its own page. 76.19.251.152 (talk) 20:17, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge? 

message: *The vgrelease template should be used in the publishers section if there were different publishers in different regions.
*What engine did the game use?
*Wouldn't the Xbox 360 version ship on a DVD, and the PlayStation 3 version on a Blu-Ray Disc?
:*Just a note in-line here — actually, the Xbox 360 release was only available through an Xbox Marketplace download. You're right on the other points, though. Geuiwogbil (Talk) 03:15, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *  Actually the X-Box 360 releaase was also available with the "Game of Year" disk. 76.19.251.152 (talk) 20:20, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox

message: *Remove the link to the online download; it treads a little too close to providing advertisement, similar to if you were to add the Amazon.com link to the boxed version.
:*I'm uncomfortable with doing this. It's the closest thing to an "official site" for the entity available, and different from an Amazon link in that Amazon is a third-party, where Bethesda Softworks' own page is first-party. I know "Links mainly intended to promote a website" are to be avoided, but in WP:EL policy that recommendation is prefaced by a note explaining that "the subject of the article or an official page of the article subject" is an exception to that rule. I don't think removing that link is a good idea. Geuiwogbil (Talk) 01:46, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been great working with you, too! I've made all your requested changes, save for the removal of the external link to the official site. Geuiwogbil (Talk) 01:46, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

text: Much thanks! Geuiwogbil (Talk) 01:59, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: External links

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on The Elder Scrolls IV: Knights of the Nine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/6Eef3BWvu?url=http://www.1up.com/news/bethesda-responds-oblivion-issues to http://www.1up.com/do/newsStory?cId=3149299
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:47, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: There are a number of "combined" pages about expansions, for example, Destiny post-release content. The plot and reception of these articles is fairly short, and I see no reason they can't be merged into one The Elder Scrolls IV expansions article due to their similar subject matter. The gameplay section doesn't have to be repeated, development can  be mostly combined as there is little about each individual expansion.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 07:36, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The two expansions appear to establish independent notability, with articles about them isolated from each other. Your example is incredibly odd too, because the Destiny post-release content article exists in addition to Destiny's two major expansions, not in lieu of them. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 00:38, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[The Elder Scrolls IV: Shivering Isles]] with [[The Elder Scrolls IV: Knights of the Nine]]