lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Website spoofing

message: This group did a good job editing the article. I was unaware of the term "website spoofing" before I read this article, and now I have a clear understanding of what "website spoofing" entails. The setup of the page and the organization of the different sections is esthetically pleasing, which is what makes the reader's experience a successful one. The table of contents adds a certain amount of organization as well. One thing I might suggest is to explore making some subcategories that correspond with the bigger sections in order to create a more in depth picture without losing the organization. The example section is incredibly helpful in showing what a website spoof is as well. They did a nice job citing their references. 68.61.255.236 (talk) 22:42, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: No. Spoofed URL is where you set up a website pretending that it's the website of somebody else, for example, if I set up a site saying "Welcome to Bill Gates' homepage. You may have heard of me. I was one of the founders of Microsoft". This, website spoofing, is about humorous websites that usually have the look of news sites for comedy effect, with 'news' articles and so on. The Onion is the best example. AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 09:16, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What a mess this article has gotten to be. Did anybody bother to read the Manual of Style before editing the article? In particular there's an excessive amount of "how-to" content and many WP:YOU violations. Unless somebody else wants to, I'll have to come back and work it over later (I do have a life outside of Wikipedia, you know), but for the moment I've put a nice cleanup-rewrite tag at the start for everybody to enjoy. MXocrossIIB (So, you were saying?);  18:33, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Yikes

message: This article is in need of a serious cleanup. I was thinking that it might be easier to WP:BLOWUP. If anyone has particular comments they can leave them here, but I'll start work soon. Touch wood. —George8211 / T 21:47, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleaning up this article 

message: Spoofed URL is an article that covers this topic in greater detail. We may need to merge. However, none of these articles seem to be aware of the existence of any of the others, which is a problem. --Lquilter (talk) 15:32, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spoofing articles are a mess
Template talk:CNSA space program

message: Project 921-3, in this template is a space station, at the article, it's a space plane. That's a problem. 70.55.203.112 (talk) 11:19, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: chinese space station?

message: The template is too large. We need to split it into multiple templates. --Titan602 (talk) 10:16, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree... it's much too large. 70.51.10.188 (talk) 23:38, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too much information! 

message: The nature of the phrase 'Chinese space program' suggests that this is related to the country China's space program. No reasonable person would have an alternative reading of that phrase. Putting Taylor Wang under the Chinese space program template is akin to giving putting Franklin Chang Díaz under the Costa Rican space program template. He was an American citizen who entered space under the American space program, putting him under the Chinese space program is either deliberate obfuscation or considers that all people of Chinese descent are forever and eternally Chinese.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.61.69.54 (talk) 14:25, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Why is Taylor Wang here?
Talk:Isis (horn-rock band)

message: For a reason that I ignore right now I thought that Laura Nyro had been a member of the group for some time. But if this is not true, maybe somebody can explain. When I listen to “Wedding Day Blues” performed by Laura Nyro and afterwards put in my Isis CDs, I swear that she is there.I put it frankly: Is Laura Nyro missing in the list of band members? 109.190.55.91 (talk) 06:16, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Laura Nyro
Talk:Long March 1

message: What about the November 16, 1969 start failure?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.220.67.88 (talk) 08:44, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crash 

message: The first paragraph states "... it was based on a class of ballistic missiles, namely the Dong Feng 3 ...", but the See Also section has "DF-4 - ICBM on which this rocket is based".  So, is this launcher based on the Dong Feng 3, or the Dong Feng 4?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rv8 (talk • contribs) 03:18, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Based on DF-3 or DF-4?
Talk:Cauliflower Alley Club

message: Where's the awards for 2008 and 2009?--Krazyj2010
:I've added them. Nikki♥311 17:44, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: 2008-9?

message: Dose any one have reference to why they call them self the Cauliflower Alley Club. As far as I would guess it would have to do with cauliflower ear do to the broken cartilage a lot of these altheas suffer, and if so should it be linked to the wiki article on it? (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cauliflower_ear) Sorry but I don’t have access to full Internet at this time or have the ability to link. 208.93.129.10 (talk) 09:42, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Club Name
Talk:Shenzhou 9

message: The current version of the article is misleading: it is neither "Soviet practice" nor Russian practice for a departing crew to return to Earth aboard a spacecraft other than the one on which they arrived. The Soyuz remains docked at the station during the crew's expedition. (It is only passengers who transfer from one Soyuz to another, or from a Shuttle to a Soyuz.) (sdsds - talk) 06:44, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Departing crew 

message: Some of the interlangs have images:
*  :pt:Ficheiro:Shenzhou-9.png
*  :zh:File:Shenzhou9-launch.jpg
-- 70.49.127.65 (talk) 11:38, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Images
Talk:Aviation Applied Technology Directorate

message: Copied verbatim:
336.2.4 Records of the Transportation Corps Board 
History: Established at Fort Monroe, VA, December 16, 1944, under jurisdiction of the OCT in accordance with provisions of paragraph 6a(4) of Army Regulation 170-10 and Army Regulation 400-5 and pursuant to Army Services Forces Circular 412, December 16, 1944. Transferred from Fort Monroe, VA, to New York Port of Embarkation, May 31, 1946; to Fort Eustis, VA, August 10, 1950. Released from assignment to OCT, August 1, 1962, and assigned to the U.S. Army Materiel Command, pursuant to Department of the Army General Order 46, July 25, 1962.Records of Office of the Chief of Transportation
Someone can take this and rewrite for the article if they like.
--THE FOUNDERS INTENT TALK 02:30, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  History section 
Talk:XBIZ

message: Is this article about the awards?  Or the website?  Is either actually notable?  -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 18:39, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article concerns 

message: I have made substantial changes to the article.  Please feel free to revise and improve.  Thanks.  AkankshaG (talk) 19:10, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: New version

message: This is quite a big list of official external links as per WP:EXT, if we were to cut down to one, or possibly two which would they be? ...the .com Widefox (talk) 18:47, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed per WP:EL and WP:PROMO. GermanJoe (talk) 17:26, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links 

message: :Category:XBIZ Award winners has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Right cite (talk) 17:30, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: [[:Category:XBIZ Award winners]] has been nominated for deletion

message: :Category:AVN Award winners has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Right cite (talk) 17:30, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: [[:Category:AVN Award winners]] has been nominated for deletion
Talk:Pier to Pub

message: Just starting this article. Hope that some of the competitors or organisers will have input into this.Mr Pillows (talk) 02:38, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Caleuche

message: I've seen this movie https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_nave_de_los_locos_(pel%C3%ADcula_de_1995). Maybe it could be added.--181.93.63.13 (talk) 02:46, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The popular Lucasarts game, Monkey Island, also features a character named Le Chuck (acronym for K Leuch?), who is a ghost, captain of a ghost ship.201.178.227.133 (talk) 04:43, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other examples in media 

message: Caleuche is also the official name of exoplanet HD 164604 b, orbiting the star Pincoya. --188.76.242.231 (talk) 15:01, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation
Talk:Next Wave Festival

message: Some of the links didn't work - also a few link directly to PDF files (not clearly labeled as such) - which then try to open and may cause problems to unsuspecting users.
No more time today - plan to come back and sort this out soon.
FoolesTroupe (talk) 02:44, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:St. Martin's Episcopal Church (Showell, Maryland)

message: The focus of this article is the church building & its history. FieldMarine (talk) 02:44, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: This article includes a section titled St. Martin's Episcopal Church Museum, which is consistent with the other articles of historic buildings in Worcester County now being used as museums.  Thanks! FieldMarine (talk) 15:38, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: '''St. Martin's Episcopal Church Museum''' section
Talk:Li Shouxin

message: Was he born in 1872 or 1892? NoToleranceForIntolerance (talk) 03:30, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  two different birth dates 
Talk:Dale "The Whale" Biederbeck

message: Does it seem strange to call him a "reoccuring" villain if he's only appeared in two episodes?
I mean, Sarah Silverman has appeared in two episodes as her character but I don't see a page for her as a "reoccuring" annoyance. --Fez2005 (talk) 02:49, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reoccuring?
Template talk:American Idol 7

message: Should eliminated contestants be put in italics until the competition is over? There is no way to differentiate between the person listed last because of the last name (i.e. Brook White) and the person who was most recently eliminated. It wouldn't be permanent, just until the end of the season, but I just wanted to get anyone's opinion before I drastically change anything. CoolKid1993 (talk) 20:56, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Templates are for permanent use, not just for this season. There is no reason to do something like that when it's being placed on the article in which it's getting it's main use. It's redundant and sort of pointless to be honest. I highly doubt that anyone gets the finishing order from the template anyway. That's not it's purpose or it's main use. It's purpose is to be used as a navigation tool. --WoohookittyWoohoo! 15:54, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Italics

message: Please either make sense by alphabetically listing or indicating why they are in some random order. Only fans of the show would even know this order and they don't need this template for that information. Templates are for navigation, we should make it easier for people to find one of the singers I doubt it's needed to put them in 2nd through 10th place but if you insist on doing so then make it clear on the template. Alphabetical order makes more sense to me. 71.139.50.253 (talk) 18:21, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please fix the order 

message: Let's not use "winner" and "runner up". Nor should we list the semi-finalists. Why? Because almost all will never have an article on the site. As for winner and runner up, we don't do that with the other season articles. The order tells the tale. --WoohookittyWoohoo! 05:14, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The final look
Talk:The Shorthorn

message: This page is NOT an orphan.  The University_of_Texas_at_Arlington page links to it.
129.107.240.1 (talk) 02:51, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bernard Baily

message: This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject.  If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class.  The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject.  Comics-awb (talk) 15:37, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Comics B-Class Assesment required

message: As this B-Class article has yet to receive a review, it has been rated as C-Class. If you disagree and would like to request an assesment, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment and list the article. Hiding T  14:52, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: C-Class rated for Comics Project
File talk:Gray759.png

message: This slide is inaccurate.  Afferents in the lower segments of the medial lemniscus pathway follow the fasciculus gracilis and synapses in the medial nucleaus in the medulla, the nucleus gracilis.  Segments C1-T2 synapse on the more lateral nucleus, the nucleaus cuneatus.
: I noticed that as well. Suggest replacement with a more suitable image --Dylan2106 (talk) 22:37, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Calabrian wine

message: I have no problem with this being included but it needs to be attached to a reliable source so that it can verified. Currently everything in the article can be attributed to a reliable source. That is a great way for an article to start out. Additions are always welcome but there is no reason to start downgrading the quality of the article by adding unsourced material. If the Italian wiki has a reliable source for the claim, by all means use it and attribute it to that reliable source. I have Sotheby in front of me but it makes no reference to the Olympic claim. For all we know, Stevenson could think it is overrated because of the Milo legend. AgneCheese/Wine 23:16, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: is  reliable? --Doopdoop (talk) 23:20, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I would think so. Thank you for finding that. AgneCheese/Wine 23:54, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Olympics claim
Talk:Joe Pittman

message: MLB.com shows his year of birth as 1954. However, baseball-reference.com as well has his obituary list the year as 1953. Bob305 (talk) 00:11, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflicting year of birth 

message: I removed the following unsourced statement as I could not find a reliable source to verify, and secondly, did he collapse on the 12th and die on the 13? Baseball-reference.com as well has his obituary list the day of death as the 13th. I have my reservations about the obituary (as stated in the previous section), but b-r would be considered a reliable source.
:"On June 12, 2014, Pittman was working a construction job in Freeport, Texas, when he suddenly collapsed and died. Immediate attempts to revive him were unsuccessful."
::I applied the  tag this evening because of the revert and comments found at User talk:Downsmith#Joe Pittman. Bob305 (talk) 04:03, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  date of death 

message: b. January 1, 1953 / d. June 13, 2014 (in Lake Jackson, Texas) – According to MLB, Legacy, Baseball Reference and Retrosheet, among other reliable resources with capacity to make periodic corrections. MusiCitizen (talk) 13:49, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! Thanks for checking back to these other reliable sources for updates. As spring and summer approach I hope to get back to editing more baseball-related articles. Bob305 (talk) 17:33, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Current Data Online
Talk:Genkō yōshi

message: Somebody please take Japanese version of this article and translate it to English. It would be easy way to get rid of stub-status of this article.
--juhtolv (talk) 12:07, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Started.  Exploding Boy (talk) 04:24, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Arigatooo gozaimasu! --juhtolv (talk) 16:52, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translate from Japanese 

message: Why put the space after kō?  Yōshi doesn’t make sense as a word.  Wouldn’t it be more logical to romanize it as genkōyō-shi, or simply genkōyōshi?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.52.4.87 (talk) 11:22, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Because the noun is a combination of 原稿/manuscript and 用紙/paper. Yōshi does make sense as a word. See this. Oda Mari (talk) 14:12, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Romanization
Talk:Loye and Alden Miller Research Award

message: Our good friend CorenSearchBot tagged this page as a copyvio of , but it looks like it was a false positive hit on the list of recipients only.   I removed the tag, please replace if I was in error. CosmicPenguin (Talk) 03:24, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed copyvio tag 
Talk:Kybunpark

message: Isn't the sponsor really "AFG Arbonia-Forster-Holding AG" and not "Arbonia-Forster-Gruppe AFG"? Lawrenceallie (talk) 03:43, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sponsor 
Talk:List of tornadoes in the May 2003 tornado outbreak sequence

message: Bay City, Illinois, which is listed as the site of one of the tornadoes, is a fictional town from a soap opera. Its inclusion probably needs looking at... — Lincolnite (talk) 11:59, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Something fishy
Talk:Sankey Valley Park

message: Suggested Infobox Park:
Cosnahang (talk) 09:32, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've gone ahead and added the infobox, but I have left the location map in the main article as I don't think that it looks right in the infobox. Dan1980 (talk | stalk) 19:38, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

text: Fair enough Cosnahang (talk) 15:14, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox Park: 
File talk:USA topo en.jpg

message: This image is supposed to be in English, right?  If so, "Pacific Ocean" is misspelled with a "z". Vid the Kid (t/c) Does this font make me look fat? 04:08, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This map was actually removed from the listing United States of America because it contains several very amateur misspellings. See current article on United States of America if you are needing to use the vastly superior file that replaced it 72.213.129.138 (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 08:15, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

message: What is it with the choice of non-capital cities to be shown? It seems pretty arbitrary.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.182.120.199 (talk) 07:08, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cities?
Talk:Circum–Baikal railway

message: Ladies and Gentlemen! I'm sorry, I badly know English. I wish to load some the photos with the purpose of an ornament of this article. Your opinions? Nobody objects? LxAndrew 06:44, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos 

message: " The tunnels and stone galleries of the Circum-Baikal are unique in that they were constructed atypically and have not been reconstructed since, conserving the initial plan of architects and engineers of the beginning of the century." - what exactly is 'unique' to the construction? --2A00:C1A0:4888:3000:D0D1:6175:962B:458C (talk) 12:36, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  unclear
Talk:Qaffin

message: Is this the Qaffin mentioned on p. 161, at z26?? 
I think it could be, but then Nahiya Jinin has to take a "tour" into  Nahiya Sara... but that has happened other places.  
And the Arabic spelling sure looks similar to my unknowing eyes. 
The map, however, has z26  (with a question mark), at around  (186/209)
User:Zero0000, what do you say? Huldra (talk) 23:50, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The places marked with question marks are put more or less anywhere in the nahiya.  I think we have to stick to H&A's assessment that Qaffin is too far away to be Jinin/z26.  It is on the far side of other places with good identification so it is hard to draw the nahiya boundaries for this to make sense. Zerotalk 00:46, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I still have my doubts, but I won't add it to the article. Huldra (talk) 20:19, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  1596 data??
Talk:George A. Bartholomew

message: Prof. William E. Evans (Ph.D. UCLA 1975) is in the archived list, but none of his students are. It's too bad that the original site has gone missing.
That list would include me (Ph.D. TAMU 2003 Dissertation record) and also Diane J. Blackwood (Ph.D. TAMU 2003 Dissertation record).
There are many more from Evans' tenure at both Texas A&M University and Notre Dame University.
:-- Wesley R. Elsberry (talk) 23:48, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional People in Bart's Academic Genealogy
Talk:Sant'Andrea delle Fratte

message: Can someone add information on two people who are the main reasons visitors come to this church these days?
To be precise:—
The third altar on the left side of the nave is where the Blessed Virgin Mary appeared to Ratisbonne, an agnostic Jew, in 1842. Ratisbonne converted on the spot. 
In 1918 St Maximilian Mary Kolbe offered his first Mass in this very same chapel.
(See http://www.saintsinrome.com/2013/08/st-maximilian-mary-kolbe_3.html )  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.152.95.149 (talk) 07:05, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs improvement
Talk:Royal Court of Sweden

message: Might it be useful to wikilink Royal Court as Royal Court?--User:Brenont (talk) 04:53, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Royal Court 

message: The official website calls itself the "Swedish Royal Court".  Should we change the name of this article to match?  GoingBatty (talk) 23:06, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Swedish Royal Court
Talk:Good (film)

message: Details, people? Nobisdom (talk) 05:04, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Good

message: The Author of this article in the plot section say's that "Eventually Halder gives in to Nazism in order to advance his career."  I do not believe that he gives into the Nazi Party to further his career.  It seemed to me that he was basically forced into the position.  His character is very passive and averse to conflict hence the hallucinations during a time of extreme conflict.  Therefore he could not say no to the party when told to join.  Actually I think he probably would have been imprisoned or killed (like many Germans that did not play ball) if he did not join.  That was my feeling anyway.
Good movie.  This demonstrates how 12% of a population of sociopaths was able to move a whole population to despicable and unspeakable atrocities.
TitusCicero (talk) 22:25, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Bad movie. Utter dross. Ss guy in black ceremonial uniform with swastika armband at end of film? People pick up on that kind of bad historical nonsense these days. 1812ahill (talk) 01:26, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Good

message: Does he really see his friend or is he hallucinating? --Error (talk) 23:58, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: In the camp

message: I've removed the reference under "External links", because the "official website" no longer exists as of this writing (24.09.12). However, I don't know how to do it at the references (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Good_%28film%29#References).
Perhaps a seasoned Wikipedian will oblige. Ajarmitage (talk) 09:17, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good: references