Talk:Madama Butterfly

message: Schiller(the musician) also used a song of this opera for "Ein schöner Tag" (i was looking for this after watching magnetic rose... i was wondering where i knew this song from) Calined (talk) 20:16, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Malcolm McLaren, too, used Un Bel Di Vedremo in his track of the same name as the opera, from his Fans album in 1984. That song., or the album, should have an article too. It may not be the greatest thing he's done but just like Buffalo Gals brought scratching and rapping to attention outside hiphop circles, Madame Butterfly prefigured some of the most striking trends of '90s pop and triphop :the droning, slightly house-like beat, the general opera influence and the dreamy, floating vocals. Back in the eighties just about no one thought pop and dance music would ever approach opera. Strausszek (talk) 15:23, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Another Adaptation

message: "Yamadori, Sharpless and Goro quietly discuss Butterfly’s blindness."  Is "blindness" the best word here?  —141.150.24.202 (talk) 04:22, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Butterfly’s blindness"? 

message: Where is the prelude to act 1??? there is nothing in here that even talks about it!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.50.121.164 (talk) 22:08, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added it as the first item of the synopsis. Regards. Francesco Malipiero (talk) 22:51, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prelude 

message: If Puccini wrote the "standard version" in 1907, how did this happen?  "Premieres of the standard version in major opera houses throughout the world include those in Buenos Aires on July 2, 1904, this being the first performance in Argentina. In London its first performance in Britain was given on July 10, 1905 at the Royal Opera House, Covent Garden, while the first US performance was presented in English on October 15, 1906, in Washington, D.C. at the Columbia Theater. The first performance in New York took place on November 12 of the same year at the Garden Theater.[8] Four years later, the first Australian performance was presented at the Theatre Royal in Sydney on March 26, 1910." 50.9.209.200 (talk) 18:40, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Performance History 

message: User  recently  a second synopsis ("Synopsis (summary)") to the article. I can't see any need for two such sections and suggest either to remove the "summary" or somehow incorporate the three paragraphs into the beginning of each act of the existing synopsis ("standard version").  -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 05:57, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I think having a concise summary of the 'standard' plot is a very useful and welcome addition. I think it might improve the article overall to split off the current "standard" version, which, though very informative, is rather too long and detailed to be called a synopses, to become a page on it's own where much more detailed information about Puccini's revisions can be incorporated. Mighty Antar (talk) 11:47, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, the 2nd synopsis was excessive and not in keeping with other opera articles. I removed the synopsis, retained the list, and the audio files.Trumpetrep (talk) 19:05, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Two synopses?

message: This scholar believes he discovered the source of Puccini's inspiration in a museum music box:
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/17/arts/music/puccini-opera-echoes-a-music-box-at-the-morris-museum.html?pagewanted=all  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.188.181.210 (talk) 11:29, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Music Box? 

message: In the Doctor Who 1996 movie, Grace Holloway, a heart surgeon, is at an opera performance of Madam Butterfly when she is called in to work on the injured Doctor. She puts  a CD on to play while she works, also Madam Butterfly. He recognizes the piece and its composer when he awakens, as the level of anesthesia they had given him was not enough for his Time Lord physiology. Later on, after he dies, regenerates, and, although he has amnesia, finds her again, while she is listening to his hearts, he picks up the same disc that she'd brought with her, suddenly recalling meeting Puccini.  JenniferRSong (talk) 06:48, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: This tangential information is probably best put in Doctor Who (1996), if anywhere, with a link back to Madama Butterfly rather than the other way around. I note that the opera isn't mentioned once in the current Dr. Who  movie article. Voceditenore (talk) 08:40, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Used in Doctor Who (1996) 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Madama Butterfly. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6GZqzdpNC?url=http://www.columbia.edu/itc/music/NYCO/butterfly/luther.html to http://www.columbia.edu/itc/music/NYCO/butterfly/luther.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:21, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I'm moving the following unencyclopedic section here for now, so that experienced editors can comment on it and decide what to do with it:
Madama Butterfly has been criticized as racist, sexist, and outdated by some opera critics, anti-racists, and feminists, as it portrays the title character as being a helpless, feminine, submissive Asian woman who is taken advantage of by a white man, which are among common negative stereotypes of Asian women.  Further controversy surrounds the opera's use of yellowface makeup to attempt to make non-Asian performers look more Asian, a practice now considered racist by many.
--Softlavender (talk) 07:01, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moving this section here for now 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:36, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Madame Butterfly (song) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 16:06, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion in progress 

message: Can anyone please point me to a source which lists the differences between the 5 versions of the opera? Thanks PhilUK (talk) 19:16, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Our colleagues at the Italian and German Wikipedias have a few more details than are mentioned here: :it:Madama Butterfly#Versioni successive and :de:Madama Butterfly#Weitere Fassungen. Searching for  brings up an aricle in Music & Letters, "Puccini's 'Work in Progress': The So-Called Versions of Madama Butterfly" (). -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 02:54, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. That article is very interesting. PhilUK (talk) 17:44, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Versions 

message: I was going through archives of the magazine Servet-i Funun and I found images that might be of an Ottoman Turkish production in the 1910s.
* https://archives.saltresearch.org/bitstream/123456789/129156/87/PFSIF9170222149.jpg
* https://archives.saltresearch.org/bitstream/123456789/129156/88/PFSIF9170222150.jpg
* https://archives.saltresearch.org/bitstream/123456789/129156/89/PFSIF9170222151.jpg
It seemed they used German and Ottoman actors
WhisperToMe (talk) 16:31, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible Turkish production in the 1910s? 

message: General consensus over whether or not the opera is racist is divided, and would make a good discussion point. The pages for the St. John Passion, Porgy and Bess, and The Death of Klinghoffer already have similar sections.
Therefore, I support adding this as a new section. If not, at least add the "Race-related controversies in opera" category.
Amadeus1928 (talk) 23:57, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I am against it. The so called controversy has no bearing on the opera itself and is in no way reflective of Puccini's intentions.  Gongfong2021 (talk) 19:55, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: If it's about the opera, widely discussed by reliable third party source, it's directly relevant to the opera. Notability and sources are how we determine relevance and notability and not personal opinion.      Mkdw talk 16:21, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add a section regarding controversy 

message: Should a legacy section be added with things like the album Pinkerton by Weezer?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ghccoolj (talk • contribs) 17:31, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legacy 

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that :File:Collina presso Nagasaki, bozzetto di Alexandre Bailly, Marcel Jambon per Madama Butterfly (1906) - Archivio Storico Ricordi ICON000079 - Restoration.jpg, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for December 27, 2022. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2022-12-27. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.2% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600th FP! 03:12, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured picture scheduled for POTD