lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Aenon

message: I got sources confirming the identification of the site in Jordan near Madaba, through a 10-year study conducted by Dr. Mohammad Waheeb. Makeandtoss (talk) 09:07, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Great. Somehow the page got it wrong, though. — LlywelynII 09:27, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Identification

message: The final section, on the Matabara Map, states that with the Dead Sea on the right side of the map (and the River Jordan on the left side)  Bethabara (below the Jordan) must be on the west of the river and Aenon (above the Jordan) must be on the east of the river. The opposite is true. Geographically, the Dead Sea is south of the Jordan and the Jordan is north of the Dead Sea. So Bethabara must be on the EAST of the river and Aenon must be on the WEST of the river. That is what the first section, on the Gospel text, already says. I intend to correct the edit. O Murr (talk) 19:33, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  East is West and West is East 

message: The reason the map distinguishes "Aenon now called Sapsaphas" here is precisely because it is NOT "Aenon near Salem", which is further north along the Jordan. Given the Madaba Map is oriented east, Aenon near Salem is further left along the map. We can talk about both Aenons on this page (along with any other 'Ain or 'Ein sites that became known as Ainon, Aenum, or Aenon under the Romans and Greeks) but we can't use an image of the wrong Aenon to illustrate the other one. — LlywelynII 09:31, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Be more careful
Talk:Nansen passport

message: austrian nansen-pass, 17 July 1928, showing use of stamps in context, should be included in wikimedia commons
* https://media.snl.no/system/images/7930/standard_nansen-pass__e2_80_93_3_1.jpg
* from : https://snl.no/Nansen-pass
64.175.41.41 (talk) 08:02, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: austrian nansen-pass
Talk:Ahimelech

message: Changed text to "extermination of the male descendants of David as a divine retribution for the extermination of the priests by Saul", rather than David. Even then this section may well be checked. JMK (talk) 19:22, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it was meant to be "David"; see his deceit at the start of chapter 21 (verse numbers vary between Jewish and Christian bibles) and remorse in 22:22. I've tried to clarify this. – Fayenatic (talk) 22:57, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Rabbinical literature
File talk:UUA Logo.svg

message: Regarding the fair-use warning.  There was a fair-use rationale at the time that it was tagged as not having one, so I'm not sure why it was tagged.  My guess however is that it was tagged as such because the image was too large/high quality to qualify as "low-quality" so I have shrunk the image to 1/10th it's previous size.  I hope that this now satisfies the fair-use rationale. Charles (Kznf) 15:48, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "This is a lossless scalable vector image." If I understand correctly, that means that changing the size doesn't change the quality.  If so, then reducing the size is irrelevant for this image.  I do think it's fair use, but don't think the image size/quality has anything to do with it's being fair use.  It is fair use, at least on the one page, because it is the corporate logo of the subject of Unitarian Universalist Association.Aleta 01:47, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't disagree with you.  SVGs are inherently "resolutionless" but I still think that it's better to offer them in smaller default resolutions than in larger ones.  (and the previous one was 10x this size by default).  This particular logo I think is comparable to the Nike symbol in that image quality or resolution are pretty meaningless terms when you're dealing with simple shapes and straight lines.  I agree with you about the fair-use rationale, and am hoping that if some admin takes a look at it, they agree. Charles (Kznf) 03:04, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I wasn't being critical of your reduction in the size.  I agree that a smaller defaultsize is desireable.  I was only saying I didn't think it had anything to do with why it's fair use.  :)  Aleta 21:46, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Size/Quality

message: What laws govern the use of the Star of David or the Christian Cross in their various versions. I don't think they can be copyrighted in most cases. Why should one even need to give a fair-use rationale?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by RDates (talk • contribs).
:the preceeding comment was moved here from the main page Charles (Kznf) 13:57, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: in response, this particular chalice is the "corporate" logo for the UUA (the actual association itself) not a generic symbol of the religion.  It's design was contracted out by the UUA to a design firm and the whole works.   It's definitely copyrighted, though wikipedia certainly has a case for fair-use, which is why that case has been made on the image page. Charles (Kznf) 13:57, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright of Religious Symbols
Talk:Ahinoam

message: I think Johnathon was 10-15 years older then David, Sal had a son during the first year of Saul's 40 year Reign.  But since back then women sometimes became wives and mothers as young as 15, Ahinoam mother of Johnathon could have been as young as 55-60 when David became King.  Women having children that old isn't unheard of, especially in The Bible.--JaredMithrandir (talk) 09:03, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age Issue
Talk:Korn (1994 album)

message: * this album needs moving back to Korn (album). A user moved it to disambiguate from Korn (2007 album) presumably without realising that it's actually called Untitled (Korn album). I couldn't do the move, not being an admin. tomasz. 15:49, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Namespacing
Talk:Stuart Litel

message: Currently working on it,it will be up in a couple of hours jgp 15:50, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Stuart is founding member of AIDA Usergroup. https://aidausergroup.org/board-of-directors/
May I add this information? Raro42 (talk) 19:35, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  AIDAUG founding member
Talk:Akeldama

message: In Acts 1:25  it says "which Judas by his transgression fell" referring to Matthew 27 where Judas hanged himself. The field of potters was bought with the silver he betrayed Jesus.
There are explanations for this apparent discrepancy:
1. Please check http://lukehistorians.com/?p=51. Judas hung himself (Matthew's account) while the person who actually bought the field for Judas, accidentally fell on the field and burst open (Luke's addendum in parenthesis).
or 2. Please see http://www.gotquestions.org/Judas-die.html. Judas did hang himself and then later (after decomposing), fell from the tree (either cut down or the branch broke) onto the field, coincidentally purchased by the scribes on his behalf with the money he left at the temple.
either way, you can view this as either an elaborate attempt to fit events to prophecy (non-believer) or an extraordinarily amazing prophecy (believer).203.45.91.227 (talk) 06:53, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Who cares but the field of life 2607:FB91:616:D45A:C0B4:E4DA:973D:FBB9 (talk) 05:21, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: 1

message: A thousand years passed between the days of Jesus and the era of the Crusades, and the current place name doesn't seem to have any continuous pedigree beyond the setting up of the monastery/hospital and its potter's field. Or are there any reliable traditions to bridge this gap of a millennium and link the name to this actual location for the 1st (or even 3rd) century AD? As far as I can see it's like with Golgotha, or still worse: there are a couple of places in Jerusalem now being pointed out as Golgotha but no real corroboration for any of them, although the tradition for the Church of the Holy Sepulchre is at least fairly old. 
If you look at the article it's plain that the oldest non-biblical discussions of the name are contradictory on where the field was supposed to be: "In his Onomasticon (ed. Klostermann, p. 102, 16), Eusebius says the "field of Haceldama" lies nearer to "Thafeth of the Valley of Ennom". But under the word "Haceldama" (p. 38, 20) he says that this field was pointed out as being "north of Mount Sion". St. Jerome changed this to "south of Mount Sion"" Nortth or south? And the name "Aceldama" would have been a fitting one to use for a hospital set up to assist strangers in this specific area by priests and knights in the 12th century, whether there was any local tradition for this place or not. 83.254.151.33 (talk) 02:41, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location of the NT field
Talk:Mount Amana

message: This article used to say Amana was "probably Amanus, or the southern summit of Anti-Libanus, at the base of which are the sources of the Abana River." I don't think Mount Amanus is in the Anti-Lebanon mountains, and the sources I'm reading seem to indicate that these are two distinct options, whereas this earlier text conflated them. I changed the text per my sources, but I don't really know the geography very well, and my sources so far aren't great. I would be glad if someone could confirm or deny my understanding on this. Sondra.kinsey (talk) 15:53, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location options 

message: Re The name Amana means "constant"..., in what language? Are morphemes identifiable? The claim is unhelpful without further information. 47.32.20.133 (talk) 17:18, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology needs fleshing out
Talk:Amasa

message: I am removing the attribution to Easton's Bible Dictionary (EBD, 1897), as it is no longer necessary in this article. This article (Amasa) was originally created as a stub consisting of two paragraphs taken from EBD:
:Amasa - burden. (1.) The son of Abigail, a sister of king David (1 Chr. 2:17; 2 Sam. 17:25). He was appointed by David to command the army in room of his cousin Joab (2 Sam. 19:13), who afterwards treacherously put him to death as a dangerous rival (2 Sam. 20:4-12).
:(2.) A son of Hadlai, and chief of Ephraim (2 Chr. 28:12) in the reign of Ahaz.
But the first paragraph has been essentially edited out and the second paragraph removed in these two edits:  and . And the meaning for the word in Hebrew (given as "burden" in EBD) has been removed in this edit: . The only text remaining that is directly derived from the original EBD material are the words "son of Abigail" and "sister (to/of) King David", but this information is readily found in the Biblical references given, and is not exclusive of EBD. --HYC (talk) 18:15, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Easton's Material
Talk:Bloom, Kansas

message: # Please read  editing tutorial and  new contributor help page before editing the first time. This  cheatsheet is useful.
# Please add  inline citations, enclosed in "ref" tags, to ensure your new text is  verifiable.
# Please read  content guidelines for US city articles.
: Sbmeirow (talk) 23:32, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important Notes Before Editing The Article 
Talk:Grafton Elliot Smith

message: The words:
"a smell dominated insectivore stage of jumping shrew-type"
make little sense to me.  Please can someone who understands what this is all about correct this.
Thanks.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.144.188.98 (talk) 10:24, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled (b)]

message: Millar implied that Grafton Elliot Smith might have faked Piltdown Man.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.139.171.34 (talk) 14:10, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Millar  

message: "The concept of hyperdiffusionism is now referred to by more neutral terms (when referring to the Americas) such as Pre-Columbian trans-oceanic contact."
It strikes me as a bit hyperbolic to equate preColumbian transoceanic contacts with hyperdiffusionism. There seems to be little dispute about the transient presence of Norsemen at L'anse aux Meadows in Newfoundland circa 1000AD (for instance), yet nobody posits this as evidence that all (or even any) culture in the Americas is derived from the Vikings.
It would make much more sense to equate postColumbian transoceanic contacts with hyperdiffusionism.
 Jwilsonjwilson (talk) 21:24, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hyperdiffusion
Talk:Hendrick Lucifer

message: I am pretty sure there are no images of this guy.  I have removed the imagerequphoto tag from the main page.  -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 16:43, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If you do happen to find it, tell me where you found it and where you are getting it from so i can help determine copyright status. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 17:03, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Image
Talk:Ater

message: nakhloli is the small village in ater that famous for fight for election of village head called sarpanch
there have many sarpanch matru(kaushal kishore),ram naresh,ganga vishnu nakhloli have two big party called bhudi and narihare bhudi party have a Mr. Rajendra,matru,brajesh,rajesh,gandharv,parashuram,brhamanand,shri krishna,hridayaram,ramshankar and santosh,arvind also related bhudi but he is not any party and narihare have ram naresh,ram bharose,gattu,lakhu,bapu,ganesh,dayaram,horilal,nandu,gavde,balakdas,etc.</sub>  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.220.52.221 (talk) 09:13, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Baali (title)

message: I have removed the question of notability.  This article is based on the entry from Easton's Bible Dictionary which is part of a Wikipedia project to make sure we have articles included in other encyclopedias.  Yes, this article is a stub, but I think the fact that it cames from Easton's makes it inherently notable. gren グレン 06:44, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The idea that the title "Baali" exists at all is based on a single verse. That verse is not a strong proof, to say the least. It seems to be merely speaking metaphorically, and is stating that Israel will have a closer relationship with God. The actual use of the name "Baali" (or "Ishi") in reference to God would need additional proof. If there is none, this content might belong as a note in Names of God in Judaism. --Eliyak T·C 01:12, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: As this article even states it's just a form of the title Ba'al meaning lord used throughout the Semitic world. Considering the origins of Judaism within Ugarit and Ba'el (Haddad) a primary god of that pantheon, there is no doubt that Ba'al was also used in reference to YHWH at some point in Jewish history. 
In fact Baal already has a section devoted to the usage of Ba'al refereing to YHWH in Israelite history. There is no point for this article on it's own, but rather any pertinent information should be merged into that section.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.190.34.219 (talk) 04:10, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Baali should be merged with the general article concerning the title Baal
Talk:Wadi Gaza and Besor Stream

message: Is this watercourse a stream or a wadi? I note that a change in the opening paragraph was made anonymously yesterday. Both terms are referred to in the alternative names in use. BobKilcoyne (talk) 04:30, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @BobKilcoyne realistically it seems to be an Israeli stream, Besor Stream, flowing into a Palestinian river valley, Wadi Gaza? I don't know why this describes them as one thing? If this is about both, there might be a name for the whole system that the page should have? BottleOfSoup (talk) 22:49, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stream or wadi 

message: Is Besor Stream really the same as Wadi Gaza? Or is Besor Steam a tributary that runs into Wadi Gaza valley / wetlands? BottleOfSoup (talk) 22:46, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Synonyms or different things? 

message: The geography section is a bit of a mess. It needs to be put on order to follow along the course of the river, down stream probably works best. But I'm not sure what order that would be without a better map? BottleOfSoup (talk) 05:43, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geography Section
Talk:Claudius Lysias

message: For the sake of possible interest: In January 1856, Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice William Parish Chilton (1810-1871) retired from the bench and entered discussion with William Lowndes Yancey about being equal partners in a law firm. Four months later, Wm. P. Chilton's ninth child was born. The name given to him (155 years ago TODAY) was Claudius Lysias Chilton. The name was peculiar then, and is peculiar today when retrieved by the BOOKS search engine on Amazon.com, either alone or in association with Edward McKendree Bounds. 
The name played a serious part in Claude Chilton's calling to the evangelical Ministry of the Methodist Episcopal Church, South: begun 1878. In 1879 his first child was born, a male named Claudius Lysias Junior. Valedictorian at Vanderbilt in 1900, Junior was also ordained into the Methodist Episcopal Church, South. Claudius Lysias Chilton First died in 1914. Rev. Claudius Lysias Chilton Second married in 1915 and in 1917 his wife gave birth to Claudius Lysias Chilton Three. This child grew up to attend Olivet College and be ordained into the Church of the Nazarene. In more organized form:
Rev. Claudius Lysias Chilton I (1856-1914)
Rev. Claudius Lysias Chilton II (1879-1929)
Rev. Claudius Lysias Chilton III (1917-1991)
---Edward M. Chilton  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.82.51.166 (talk) 05:47, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Latter Day Claudius Lysias's I, II, and III

message: Was the Tribune tasked to find the body of Christ? Tony DeVose (talk) 01:59, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Tribune of Acts 21:31
Talk:Abel-beth-maachah

message: Dear Ms Panitz-Cohen, if you find the time, it would be of great use to the Wikipedia users if you could please help include in the intro a few words about what makes the site attractive, a summary of the site's evolution and of the most important findings so far, and maybe some other "headline-making" discoveries there. As it is now, the main article is terribly dry & technical, and at least the intro, which is what most people probably read, should give more "in-a-nutshell" information. I strikes me for instance that, while most users would arrive to this page due to the biblical story of the siege of a walled city in the time of David, no Iron Age II fortifications have been found so far. I have tried today (19 Aug.) to include such a summary myself, by combing the article, but I am sure that this tertiary reuse of material cannot be of much value. Thank you! ArmindenArminden (talk) 14:37, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  What are the most interesting findings? 

message: ... for all the different spellings, starting with Abel Beth Maacah. See in the article. "maachah" with -ch- is one of the rarest spellings, maybe we should change the title, too; but redirects would fix it for now. Thanks. ArmindenArminden (talk) 11:43, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirects are needed
Talk:Abel-cheramim

message: Looking about, I've found sources explaining the etymology of "Abel-Chermim" as "Plain" or "Meadow" of the vineyards.  However, I have been unable to find any suggestion that "Brook" might be involved in the etymology.  The Hebrews word used in the Bible for brook (unless there are more I don't know about) are 'aphiq, mikhal, nachal, and ye'or.  None of them look even remotely related to 'Abel.'  That's why I'm removing brook from the etymology section.  But if anyone finds any reason why it should be there, I'll put it back up there right away.Mitchell Powell (talk) 03:25, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Etymology
Talk:Haggai

message: Haggai’s Wikipedia article is very short. The article contains little to no information on his prophecy and diplomacy with Persians. The article could use information on the Jewish relationship with the Persian Empire. In the section “Haggai and officials of his time” I want to talk about Haggai’s message to Zerubbabel, as he would be the first Davidic monarch restored. The Persian Empire was growing weak, and Haggai saw this at a time where the Kingdom of David was able to rise and take back their part in Jewish issues. I want to create a section titled “Haggai’s Prophecies” and write: Haggai prophesies, in 520 BCE Jerusalem, about the people need to complete building the Temple. If this did not happen, he claimed, there would be poverty, feminine, and drought affecting the Jewish nation. I will also add to this section: Haggai vouches for the prophet having seen the Temple before its destruction in 586 BCE. The source for my information is Lawrence Schiffman, From Text to Tradition, Chapter 3: “Judaism in the Persian Period.”
If anyone has comments on these changes, please let me know on my Talks Page. Thank you! NicoleNewman1234 (talk) 16:23, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing the article
Talk:Jabin

message: The following sounds like utter baloney, so I've moved it here:
* A relatively little known chief in the Del Norte tribe of Native Americans from the region that is now Northern California, Jabin Kahl oversaw a tribal conglomeration from 1784 till his untimely death in 1815.  He is best known for introducing the art of genital piercing into the Del Norte cultural lexicon.  Chief Jabin died in a tragic accident in the fall of 1815, when in the process of self-administering a routine testicular piercing, he inadvertently ruptured the main urethral artery and succumbed to extensive blood loss.  Chief Jabin's forward thinking innovation in the field of genital piercing was decades, if not centuries ahead of his time and his contributions are said to have inspired modern forms of the art, such as the exquisite prince albert ring and the unparalleled uvula bi-section.
Paul B 15:33, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Honda Battle of the Bands

message: The article says the HBOB started in 2003 and the sidebar says Drumline (2002) is a fictionalized version of it.
Unless the movie predicted the future either the HBOB is older than '03 (a name change?) or the movie is not based on it.
Plbogen (talk) 03:33, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Started in 2003 but the 2002 movie is based on it?
Talk:Bill Hambrecht

message: Don't know when Hambrecht was on the AOL board, but it wasn't from Dec. 2010 to Feb. 2010.  He's a remarkable man but no so remarkable as to have travelled backwards in time.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.246.207.211 (talk) 16:09, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  AOL Board
Talk:HMS Peacock

message: I've just been reading British Columbia from the Earliest Times to the Present, E.O.S. Scholefield and F.W. Howay, p. 406 and in the section quoting Sir George Simpson's account of his trip to the Columbia District, he says "The Peacock Sloop of War had been totally lost on the Columbia Bar a few weeks prior to my arrival [in 1841] but the officers and crew were providentially saved".  Other vessels like the HMS Porpoise, HMS Flying Fish, HMS Vincennes and HMS Wave are also mentioned; also a ship Oregon but it's unclear if it's HMS or not.  Anyway the dates for the HMS Peacocks listed on this page don't seem to jibe with 1841.  Anyone have any more info?Skookum1 (talk) 15:44, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: An ''HMS Peacock'' wrecked on the [[Columbia Bar]]