lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:California Civil Code

message: Should this page not just redirect to California Statutes or that page redirect here?  They seem redundant.  That page is not much more detailed than this one, but given the titles, we probably only need one of these two articles... --Jayron32|talk|contribs 05:36, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: CA law consists of 29 codes (of which the Civil Code is but one), the "statutes" (which are discussed in California Statutes, and the state constitution.  The two articles deal with separate (but related) things. Ccollom 06:23, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Kewl beans. Thanks for clearing that up! --Jayron32|talk|contribs 06:25, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: N/P. Your question made me realize that some clarification should be made within the articles. Thank you. (Also, I'm a noob) Ccollom 06:29, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Already exists?

message: I used http://www.dos.state.ny.us/info/nycrr.html to organize New York Codes, Rules and Regulations.  In that case, it was appropriate for each Title of the code to point to a corresponding department of state government.
Now, I'm not familiar with California government.  Is it appropriate to attempt the same kind of organization using http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/calaw.html ?
user:Agradman, editing for the moment as 128.59.178.82 (talk) 19:25, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should our presentation mimic [[New York Codes, Rules and Regulations]]?
Talk:Situation Hopeless... But Not Serious

message: I caught this film at random yesterday. It is very odd, flimsy sets and unrealistic performances. 
What wasn't clear is why Frick continues to hide them after the war is over, having to find food for 3 rather than one. Why does he do it? How long was he going to do it? What was his plan? Completely unlikely.
Wolstan Dixie (talk) 13:46, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fricks's motivation
Talk:Ann-Marie Ivars

message: "Contributors sometimes create articles over several edits, so try to avoid deleting a page too soon after its creation if it appears incomplete. Users nominating a page for speedy deletion should specify which criteria the page meets and consider notifying the page's creator." Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion
What's the problem with the page? I will correct any problem pointed, I just created it.--SangeYasha 05:55, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: As the reviewing admin, this article certainly passes Speedy, for some notability is obviously being asserted as a project leader. However , the article needs expansion to show: professional bio--birth, degrees, positions; major published works; references to he work from outside sources per WP:CITE. Links to her home page and other key professional sites. The actual notability will depend on what's shown here.DGG (talk) 10:45, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: =review=-
Template talk:Di-no license-notice

message: Please change interwiki link of vi:Tin nhắn về bản quyền hình to vi:Thiếu giấy phép-tb. Thanks. Vinhtantran (talk) 01:32, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed the tag for now, as the interwiki page you link to does not exist.  Please check the link and add the tag again once you've found the right page. Happy‑melon 10:40, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Interwiki

message: 
The template currently contains the comment . It should instead contain . Algebraist 16:18, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. This page has a really bizarre history... --- RockMFR 22:38, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect comment

message: How is this template used? I've created it on cy, but each time I go to use it with  and then try to edit the section, it goes to the template..... Help?! -- Xxglennxx (talk • cont.) 04:04, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Using the template 

message: Per discussion at User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise#User:Mariocrossing1, shouldn't this template and the related ones have a link to WP:IUP so that recipients of the warning have information that will assist them in learing about when it is appropriate to use copyrighted images on Wikipedia and what documentation needs to be provided when such images are used. Mjroots (talk) 08:22, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: You didn't specify where you wanted the link so I've added a sentence at the bottom. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 11:26, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

text: PS, why didn't you do this yourself? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 11:27, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Be WP:BOLD you mean? I wasn't sure whether or not this would be a good idea, and I didn't want to interfere with a highly used template without some discussion first. I've added the text to the related templates. Mjroots (talk) 11:43, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, being bold is not much different from adding  and asking another admin to be bold on your behalf ;) We generally don't use  as a tool to gather opinions. If you are not sure about whether an edit is controversial, you could just let the proposal stand for a few days and if no one objects, make the edit yourself. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 15:21, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Images, copyright etc aren't my strongest point. In this case, there was no harm in asking first. Mjroots (talk) 16:44, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Link to IUP?

message: Please remove the line  - protection templates are automatically handled by the documentation page. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 06:34, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Done — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:51, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 22 March 2019
Talk:Beaux Arts

message: This page is terrible--talk about missing the forest for the trees!  Surely some effort should be made to define the term "beaux arts" in and of itself--not merely list a bunch of articles that happen to have the phrase in their names?! --92.142.152.235 (talk) 22:26, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a disambiguation page, not an article. The actual article on this topic is already very well developed, and is at Fine art.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  14:16, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Define
Talk:Louisiana Highway 182

message: Well that's a stinker. I just had the information updated on the present condition and status of LA 182, just to notice the LADOTD made changes to the highway system, moving the entire route between Exit 115 and I-10 onto I-10 and the Evangeline Thruway. LA 182-1 and LA 182-2 also got the boot. I'll try to update this information when possible, as well as the re-route of US 167 around Lafayette. — MatthewAnderson707 (talk|sandbox) 19:05, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  LADOTD routing change
Talk:Daiei (era)

message: The following data was posted without verifying source citations.  It has been moved here pending verfication ... but the more interesting question has to do with whether this kind of additional information would be potentially helpful in all the Nengō articles?  Such a project would involve a lot of work for someone -- but it's not something I'm interested in developing.  Presumably, the editor who added these two sections also felt unwilling to invest the level of work needed for full metastasis? 
===Births of the Daiei era===
* Daiei 1, on the 3rd day of the 11th month (December 1, 1521):  Takeda Shingen, general [died Tenshō gannen (1573)].
* Daiei 2 (1522):  Sen no Rikyū, master of Tea Ceremony [died Tenshō 19 (1591)].
* Daiei 2 (1522):  Shibata Katsuie, general [died Tenshō 11 (1583)].
===Deaths of the Daiei era===
* Daiei 3, on the 9th day of the 4th month (May 23, 1523):  Ashikaga Yoshitane, 10th Shōgun of the Muromachi Bakufu [born Bunshō Gannen (1466)].
* Daiei 6, on the 7th day of the 4th month (May 18, 1526):  Emperor Go-Kashiwabara [born Kanshō Gannen (1460)].
In brief, the question becomes "Is this a good idea?" --Tenmei (talk) 20:26, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Arguably useful addition

message: * Daiei 3, on the 9th day of the 4th month (May 23, 1523):  Ashikaga Yoshitane, 10th Shōgun of the Muromachi Bakufu [born Bunshō Gannen (1466)].
* Daiei 6, on the 7th day of the 4th month (May 18, 1526):  Emperor Go-Kashiwabara [born Kanshō Gannen (1460)].
In brief, the question becomes "Is this a good idea?" --Tenmei (talk) 20:26, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Deaths of the ''Daiei'' era
Talk:The English Constitution

message: This article focusses entirely on the comparative aspects of Bagehot's work (typical of Wikipedia it is US-orientated and ignores the main thrust of the work). It needs to address the major thrust of the text which is concered with analysing and assessing the British constitution. --Toddy1980 (talk) 13:02, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Focus 
Talk:Robert Cohen (playwright)

message: I've just turned Robert Cohen (writer) into a redirect to this hagiography. I reproduce the text of the former article below. -- Hoary 06:42, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Alternative

message: * Anglo-American Name Authority File, s.v. “Cohen, Robert”, LC Control Number n 50027571. Accessed 25 October 2007.
* University of California, Irvine, Department of Drama,  Faculty, s.v "Robert Cohen". Accessed 25  October 2007.
</div>
Robert Cohen writing from this point: I agree that the replaced text was hagiographic (I do not  know who wrote it) and I have trimmed the entry to correct this. ... added at (01:37, 16 November 2007 by User:68.5.27.220
What?!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.109.61.24 (talk) 04:46, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  References

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Robert Cohen (acting theorist). Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Steel1943 (talk) 20:44, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Robert Cohen (acting theorist)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Emil Chronicle Online

message: Per WP:NONENGEL, as far as links go, the way to do things is to use the official English site, and the official site of the country where it was developed. Eik Corell (talk) 12:58, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Noted. Please remove the links if you feel they should be removed.Estavali (talk) 15:47, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edits
Talk:English, August (film)

message: According to Dev Benegal a 35 mm print of movie was discovered in National Film Archives and apparently it is in good condition,so perhaps article should reflect this fact.  Ohsin  21:14, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  New 35mm print found at NFA
Talk:Distant Thunder (marching band)

message: Distant Thunder merged with Equinox in 2010, as the article now correctly says.
I have attempted to add in the info box that it disbanded 2009.
Please can someone create a new article for "NeXuS Drum & Bugle Corps"
The website is http://nexus-dbc.org.uk, and if any information is needed, please get in touch with either me or Gareth Morrallee.
--Joe O'Dell (Vie ascenseur) - :) (talk) 11:01, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Equinox Drum & Bugle Corps
Talk:FK Takovo

message: Could you please explain why you removed the  tag from this article? There is nothing in this article to explain why this particular football club deserves a stand-alone article, and you left no explanation in your edit summary. If there is any information which would indicate that this club meets WP:FOOTYN or WP:N, please add it to the article with appropriate citations. — Jkudlick tcs 01:07, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding CSD removal
Talk:Corn (term)

message: I removed the redirect to Talk:Corn (disambiguation) which confused me, why shouldn't this page have its own talkpage? -- Mad031683 (talk) 21:43, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem; it was just an accident of the complicated history. SamuelTheGhost (talk) 22:29, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

message: So does anyone know if corn is a Old World or a New World plant?
(I know it shouldnt be confused with the old English term "Corn"- meaning a grain.)
I've been debating this with a friend of mine.
-Bill-
October 11, 2008  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.231.62.163 (talk) 23:53, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Dear Bill, I'd worried that wikipedia isn't already sufficiently clear about this. Is it because you didn't follow the link to maize, or is the statement there that "Maize (IPA: /ˈmeɪz/) (Zea mays L. ssp. mays), known as corn in some countries, is a cereal grain domesticated in Mesoamerica and subsequently spread throughout the American continents" not explicit enough? SamuelTheGhost (talk) 12:03, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origins of Corn 

message: This article should be redirected to Maize. Please consider this option. Maize
:First, I must thank you for raising the question here, rather than just editing the article itself, which so many have done recently. I can assure you that the option you recommend has been considered at great length, as you can see if you look at Talk: Maize. Many people wanted to do as you suggest, but others disagreed. The reasons for having it this way are implied by the content of the article as it is. If you read that carefully and thoughtfully, you may come to understand those reasons, particularly if they cause you to realise things you didn't previously know, which I suspect may be the case. If after reading it, you still disagree, please come back here with more detailed comments. Best wishes, anyway SamuelTheGhost (talk) 23:47, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: #REDIRECT [[maize]]

message: 1 January 2008
Please note that I added Popcorn as an edible treatment of corn.  I also deleted Candy Corn.  Although undoubtedly candy corn is fabricated from corn syrup, if candy corn belongs in the list, then every other product manufactured from or with corn syrup belongs there as well.  
--Brian--
Hello Brian. 
Thanks for explaining your edit. I've shifted your comment here to the bottom of the page in accordance with WP conventions, and to make it easier to read things in the right order.
Candy corn needs to be there because it has "corn" in its name and this is primarily a disambiguation page. I have, however, put it in a different section. Thanks for pointing out that it was indeed under the wrong heading.
"Popcorn" is already there; once is enough. SamuelTheGhost (talk) 11:20, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Popcorn and Candy corn
Talk:Château Ksara

message: Kindly note that the content of the Wikipedia "Chateau Ksara" is owned by Chateau Ksara and has copyrights and is available on the website http://chateauksara.com/ 
The blog http://lebanonroad.blogspot.de/p/tourism-in-lebanon.html has copied the content from the website of Chateau Ksara  — Preceding unsigned comment added by MyaBell117 (talk • contribs) 16:13, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
Talk:FLEX (operating system)

message: if it is open source, where is the source? Divinity76 (talk) 07:21, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  open source? 
Talk:Rue Hamra

message: This article is terrible.  It should be expanded and divided into several sections, including: (i) Hamra's economy; (ii) Hamra's ethnic and religious makeup; and (iii) Hamra's history (including subsections on the Israeli invasion, and the Hizbollah, Qowmiyeen takeover in 2008).  Also, I can't understand why this article is called "Rue Hamra" when in fact it should be called "Hamra Street" which is what it is called in English.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Zalali (talk • contribs) 18:38, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Must be redone
Talk:Cheer-Accident

message: In NBA Jam arcade game "Cheer Accident" appears as a courtside advert  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.101.175.221 (talk) 03:28, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

message: Should we add their 7"s, or create a separate section for them within the Discography? They have five 7"s altogether: 3 regular singles, a split single, and a split 7" EP.  --  Pete Best Beatles (talk) 09:18, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add 7"s ?
Talk:Muzaffar Alam

message: Note:  Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 15:52, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Delhi Addition
Talk:National Highway Authority (Pakistan)

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://web.archive.org/web/20060204015359/http://www.nha.gov.pk/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  TreyGeek (talk) 01:16, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Propulsion and Structural Test Facility

message: A recent photo would help the article. What is the site like now.doncram (talk) 21:27, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There are several photos taken in 2010 as part of the Carol M. Highsmith collection that are available to be uploaded to Commons. (Indeed, it's possible somebody has already taken this step.) The two most interesting images, imho, are here and here. - Dravecky (talk) 09:53, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Photos
File talk:Forest of The cedars of God.jpg

message: Beautiful! Thank you for the picture.
::--Eternalsleeper 07:30, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

message: This image is beautiful!
How did you manage to get your hands on such a picture?
I've always wanted to know what the Cedars of Lebanon looked like.
How do you nominate these images again? Your's definately has a big chance at getting featured.
TurtleShroom! :) †Jesus Loves You and Died for you!† 21:27, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wow
Talk:Redstone Test Stand

message: Dan Bonenberger says that the Redstone was the carrier of first atomic warhead deployed to NATO troops, see Historic American Engineering Record.  The MGR-1 Honest John was actually the first (deployed in 1954).  The PGM-11 Redstone was first deployed in 1958.  I will remove this claim.Mattise135 (talk) 15:19, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  First atomic warhead deployment 
Talk:Chris Van Dusen

message: Chris Van Dusen, creator of children's picture books including the Mercy Watson series.
* 
* 
I don't find this screenwriter in the LC Catalog, nor having LC control number (LCCN), but the national library of Portugal seems to have this one (now line 2) and France seems to have another (now line 4). --P64 (talk) 21:23, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: P.S. So I put VIAF=120638006 (and Nat Lib Portugal) in the article footer, replacing the other. --P64 (talk) 23:07, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not to be confused with
Talk:George Oscar "G.O.B." Bluth II

message: this page is written terribly, it should be edited way down.
Is there a source for his full name? I don't remember it ever being discussed on the show. -70.181.204.223 (talk) 10:56, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In the very first episode, each major character is introduced with an on-screen subtitle, which is the only way we ever get to find out GOB and Maeby's actual names.
I'm confused why the article states the name is "usually written 'Gob'", and then proceeds to use the "G.O.B." spelling everywhere else.   Is there a source for what spelling the writers of the show prefer? dclayh (talk) 04:42, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Adventures of Totor

message: where has this been reprinted in recent years? so that an Hergé collector may have a chance to read it? someone above mentions Archives Hergé, when were they printed? anything since? ever in English? any excerpts in any of the biographies? if so, this info should be in the article .....
with all the neverending repackagings of Hergé material, there must be some archival collectors edition of his first comic?
J Edward Malone (talk) 15:43, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  reprints? 

message: Any comics from 1926 just hit the public domain in the US this year (French only presumably). Consider this a landmark. I recommend taking out the fair use label from the comic image because I think it's from 1926. PseudoSkull (talk) 06:18, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  1926!
Talk:Seventh-day Adventist education

message: I recently moved some large portions of material from the Progressive Adventism page, so the POV may be a little lopsided currently. I invite other editors to assist its neutrality by contributing content. Colin MacLaurin 12:28, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This reads like a list of petty grievances rather than an article about Seventh Day Adventist Education.  Sections are missing, and the controversy/negative point of view is presented first, as if that is the only information available on collegiate SDA Education.  I'm welcoming others to add useful and relevant input as well, and I suggest creating a controversy section at the end where the grievances (and opposing views?) can be moved.  Soliciting feedback on this reorganization of the page.Djneufville (talk) 11:09, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV