lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Theta Aurigae

message: Bogardus, funny name! It most certainly sounds like a latinized German surname, such as Bogart, and also like Swedish/Danish/Norwegian "bo" (house/nest) + "gård" (garden/yard). It doesn't make an entry in my Latin ↔ English Dictionary. I think this might be a hoax. I'll see if I can find an entry at The VizieR Catalogue Service, it uses to be complete. Said: Rursus ☺ ★ 18:48, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope, nilnada at VizieR! I'll make a google. Said: Rursus ☺ ★ 18:49, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Google makes a number of hits on Bogardus plus theta Aur, but most looks like copies of Wikipedia, parts of info collected from Wikipedia, and the rest like amateur astron. discussions. Bogardus is probably a hoax. Said: Rursus ☺ ★ 18:55, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I forgot to say: Bogardus is intensely ugly too. It sounds like the quacking of toads in a stinky midgetfilled pond a summer night in May. Said: Rursus ☺ ★ 19:02, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bogardus
Talk:Theta Capricorni

message: I removed the following from the article:
: This star has also been adopted by Gabriel Nickolas Cazotto, and received the name of Fernanda de Oliveira e Reis Charro Quirino into the Star Alliance Catalogue with the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory catalogue. 
The claim seems questionable and is not substantiated with citations. I was also unable to confirm this via a search.—RJH (talk) 18:22, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questionable claim
Talk:Theta Serpentis

message: Theta Serpentis and Alya were referenced in the final episodes of the TV show Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. 
Is it appropriate to add a section to mention this and any other possible cultural references? 
 TheLimitOfSafety (talk) 19:43, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: See Stars and planetary systems in fiction, linked in the see also section.  Lithopsian (talk) 20:35, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference in Popular Culture
Talk:Theta Tauri

message: The text and introbox contradict each other as to which star is Theta1 and Theta2, B and A, type K, A and G. Could someone review? — kwami (talk) 07:59, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  confused presentation 

message: For this name, the IAU cites Milbrath 2010. On p.253 she cite Sosa 1985:341 'The Maya Sky, the Maya World', but it's actually Sosa p.431. The orthography checks out,, Sosa has <Čamukuy>, and the only thing he says is "the name of a small bird, corresponds to theta Taurus, with u k'áak' ['its fire'] being Betelgeuse". — kwami (talk) 19:43, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chamukuy
Talk:Theta Ursae Majoris

message: Allen 1899 doesn't specifically label theta as Al-Haud, but rather "this space". Allen mentions lots of asterisms with multiple members. However, Kostjuk 2002 (see table3.dat) doesn't mention "Al-Haud" anywhere. I think this is not a name of Theta. Rursus dixit. (mbork3!) 18:47, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Al Haud
Talk:Silvan, Diyarbakır

message: The intro parenthetical should list the current names of the city in appropriate commonly employed languages (or note the historical nature of the title). It's possible the Greeks still call the city 'Martyropolis', but seems dubious. They probably just call the site Silvan now. Anyone got a Greek atlas or atlas site handy? — LlywelynII 13:54, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Heading
Talk:Rosariazo

message: Though the term Rosariazo is used to refer to the specific events in Rosario, it seems that usually the  national episode as a whole is referred to as the Cordobazo. A Google search for "Rosariazo" gets me 12,600 hits, but "Cordobazo" gets 374,000... yet there is no "Cordobazo" article on Wikipedia! 
I'm going to create one at my earliest convenience, and then will probably rewrite or delete this one... any thoughts? --Brian Z 00:48, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They were two related sets of events, but they for sure are not the same; in particular the second Rosariazo was not triggered directly by anything happening in Córdoba. Check the chronology and the sources. Of course Cordobazo should have its own article. Or we could try and merge the whole series of events in one article called "Civil unrest in Argentina in 1969" or something like that, but it would take a historian to do that. —Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 17:22, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Tucana Dwarf

message: Other in the locution its location on the opposite side of the Milky Way from other Local Group galaxies implies that this "Dwarf", which is actually a dwarf galaxy and should be titled Tucana Dwarf Galaxy, is part of the Local Group. Gimli is a dwarf: the subject here is a galaxy. --Wetman (talk) 02:41, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: cf Dwarf stars. Dropping galaxy renders these titles jargon. --Wetman (talk) 13:54, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I nominate this article for the stunning number and variety of forms deriving from  "Isolated". Hilarleo Hey,L.E.O. 06:01, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[isolate]] 
Talk:TZ Arietis

message: There are a lot of different names used for this star, with no apparent single common name. From a search in ADS, it looks like Gl 83.1 (Gliese 83.1) might actually be the most commonly used name. The exoplanet databases use GJ 9066 because that's what's used in the paper that confirmed the presence of a planetary system around this star. In the absence of a clear common name I'd prefer to use the variable star designation (TZ Arietis), which is indeed what's used in this recent paper. Thoughts? SevenSpheres (talk) 23:06, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: As well as which name is most frequently used, we should give (just a little) consideration to which is most "accessible".  The variable star designation would probably win that contest, but the Gliese designation is also slightly more understandable, at least to serious armchair astronomers, than a Luyten (I assume) designation.  You should be able to move it yourself.  Worst that happens is someone objects and we have a longer discussion.  Lithopsian (talk) 14:10, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:Uppsala–DLR Asteroid Survey

message: Discrepancy: UAO-DLR Asteroid Survey & Uppsala–DLR Trojan Survey should be either:
# UAO-DLR Asteroid Survey & UAO–DLR Trojan Survey, or
#  & Uppsala–DLR Trojan Survey.
Both use the Uppsala Astronomical Observatory (UAO), so we should decide whether to use UAO or Uppsala.   ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf)  14:45, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Discussion moved to WT:AST#UAO-DLR or Uppsala-DLR? for greater visibility.   ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf)  21:23, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  UAO-DLR or Uppsala-DLR?
Talk:Denizens of the House

message: I would just like to say that anyone who has any further information on this topic is welcome to post it.  Thanks, Lord Mandos 00:50, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

message: This topic is not discussed widely in the books, but it seems like a fairly important topic to the Denizens.  However, to find more about it pretty much requires completely re-reading the books, so if anyone can get some info on fashion it would be great.  Thanks, Lord Mandos 15:36, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: House Fashion

message: After making a lot of link and other changes to this article, I wonder how neccesary it is. Virtually every character listed has its own discussion in the Characters of The Keys to the Kingdom article. Just a thought. Alcemáe 03:14, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I dont think that a "Humans" article should be created, since the only two humans that are very relevent are Arthur and Leaf; and Arthur has his own article. The are really only two important Piper's Children, Fred and Suzy; and Suzy also has her own page. The major problem is that the vast majority of important characters are Denizens. So to move all Denizens here would make this one rather large, and the main one small. The major character sets are: the Heroes, the Will, the Trustees, Dawns, Noons and Dusks, Misc. Denizens, Humans, and Nithlings. I would propose that the current main article be the main entries on Leaf, the Trustees, the Will, Nithlings and Humans; with a brief description of Arthur and Suzy, and a link to their pages. All Misc. Denizens, inlcuding the Dawns, Noons and Dusks, would be this article, as the main entry on them; the Trustees should also be mentioned on this page, but not in detail, and with a link to the main article. The "main entry" would be where the most thorough discussion of the character would be, with any other mention on any other page just being a brief snippet. Thoughts? Alcemáe 06:09, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neccesary?
Talk:Upsilon Carinae

message: From notorious star name inventor User:Richontaban aka 168.223.11.X:
:Vathorz Prior, a name of Old Norse-Latin origin
Old Norse? When then was the name invented? Old Norse was spoken from 800 to 1200, a time when nobody from Scandinavia traveled far south enough to even see Carina constellation. The lie is as ridiculous as the modern medical term Biceps used for Gamma Herculis. I can for sure say that there were never such a word as "Vathorz" in Old Norse, since 'z' and 'o' in unstressed position weren't used in Old Norse, and there were never such a stem as vathor-. I'm going to clean up some more of his (her?) stinking crap soon. Rursus dixit. (mbork3!) 21:11, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Heh, yes I'm finding quite a bit of creative OR in some of these star articles. Giant stars with radii smaller than the Sun, and so forth. We just need to start adding more inline citations and get this stuff verified. Regards, RJH (talk) 16:52, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Crappy lie
Talk:Oronzio Maldarelli

message: The source of most of this article is :
http://americanart.si.edu/search/artist_bio.cfm?StartRow=1&ID=3079
I'll try and make it at least not word for word, but maybe not tonight? Carptrash 00:54, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: So, do you have any family stories about him?  Are there any of his sculptures lurking around in family hallways or closets that you could get pictures of? Do you know of a photo that could be used in the article?  Anyway, thanks for getting the ball rolling. Carptrash 02:02, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh yes, I have a picture of 70 sculptors taken at the 3rd Sculpture International that might include OM.  Might you, or do you know someone who might recognize him in 1949? Carptrash 02:07, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

text: If you eamil me at lifejune1949 at yahoo dot com I'll send you the picture.  Also, you can't just borrow pictures from web sites or books unless you understand the copyright issues.  I also have pictures of his work that I could send you, but could not post here.  Meanwhile, let's keep this article growing.  Carptrash 03:05, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

text: No rush.  Life, at least mine, is not a race to get to the finish as quickly as possible.  Neither are most things in it.  Carptrash 01:11, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

text: Don't worry about an END too soon.  I'm not planning on dying for a long time.  However, clicking on my Carptrash 01:33, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Encirclement campaigns (Chinese Civil War)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved to Encirclement campaigns (Chinese Civil War). Consensus to move, with slightly more support for the dab arrangement.  – robertsky (talk) 07:02, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Encirclement campaigns →  – Encirclement is a very generic military term that can be applied to a vast number of military campaigns; since this page focuses primarily on those conducted during the Chinese Civil War, it would be better for it to be named accordingly. Pg 4919 (talk) 00:54, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

text: Support alternate Encirclement campaigns (Chinese Civil War) since it's a distinct title used in the historiography of the era, it just needs disambiguation from Encirclement. Orchastrattor (talk) 02:23, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

text: Support alt proposal per Orchastrattor. estar8806 (talk) ★ 00:29, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

text: Relisting comment: Relist, to determine whether to use natural or parathetical disambiguation BilledMammal (talk) 06:00, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 21 January 2024
Talk:Upsilon2 Centauri

message: This article is tagged as having no references, but it has plenty of star catalogue references. Do these not count? Gizmoguy (talk) 22:13, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 
Talk:Tsyben Zhamtsarano

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Skarmory (talk • contribs) 06:36, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Jamsrangiin Tseveen →  – WP:COMMONNAME in scholarly sources. — Goszei (talk)  02:21, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

text: Noting Talk:Jamsrangiin_Tseveen#Name. -Kj cheetham (talk) 09:26, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

text: Support per my proposal. Both sources currently included in the article use his Russian name, Atwood 2004 using "Tsyben Zhamtsarano" and Sanders 2017 using "Tsyben Jamsrano". Google Scholar returns 171 results for "Tsyben Zhamtsarano" across a variety of modern scholarly sources (as well as returning citations to his own scholarly works, which he wrote in Russian), but only 8 results for "Jamsrangiin Tseveen". For what it's worth, Britannica's single mention of him also spells his name as "Tsyben Zhamtsarano" . — Goszei (talk)  20:02, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 23 June 2023
Talk:2007 Nova Scotia Liberal Party leadership election

message: Scott Brison, eh? Something tells me he's probably still a Tory provincially. -- Earl Andrew - talk 00:58, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't add him, but no he is actually an active Liberal provincially and campaigned hard for Liberal candidates within his federal consitituency in the last election.  Paula Lunn, who was at the convention as a Liberal delegate, almost won a Tory held seat despite the poor fortunes of the provincial Liberals, she credits her near victory on Brison's help. He really has no choice however because the NSLP is both a federal and provincial organization, until the membership changes passed at the Liberal convention in December you couldn't join one without joining the other, they continue to have a shared executive, etc. - Jord 12:52, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Here's a source from a quick search showing Brison as a potential candidate.  - Jord 12:54, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Anyone know any Nova Scotia residents, or people willing to travel? I've guaranteed access to the event for a photographer and journalist, likely university students in the field if we can't find any internally, and Mike Smith is the first candidate to have his "people" (my term, not his) agree to grant us access the day of. I've contacted all the current candidates and MLAs about this.  --  Zanimum 16:18, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Access to the convention: GRANTED 

message: Someone has updated the endorsement list anonymously... While they added a ton to the list, they removed the following:
* Senator Jim Cowan
* Geoff Regan, Liberal MP for Halifax West
I'm contacting them now to find out who they have endorsed.  --  Zanimum 12:38, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Endorsements 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:British Columbia Liberal Party leadership contest, 2011 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. 117Avenue (talk) 02:41, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion in progress
Talk:V354 Cephei

message: The mass of below 4 solar masses seems dubiously low for a Red supergiant, is V354 Cephei closer to an extreme AGB-star rather than a RSG? Please clarify. Nussun05 (talk) 18:25, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The source is just a mass database of crude models.  It says  but that doesn't mean it is a very reliable mass.  StarHorse seems to produce a lot of low mass estimates for supergiants, it may be heavily weighted towards assuming more common masses.  Or it may just be that assuming the Gaia parallax gives a lower luminosity and so it looks like an AGB star.  Or not, we don't really know.  Lithopsian (talk) 21:11, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe the same case is present for the low mass of KW Sagitarii and Trumpler 27-1? (Though honestly, both stars are too big to be AGBs).PNSMurthy  (talk) 23:00, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mass 

message: Simbad tells AT Persei is case 75, not V354 Cephei. Which star is Case 75?PNSMurthy  (talk) 23:03, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: AT Persei is Case 75, V354 Cephei is [NBM54] 75. Simbad even states that V354 Cep was improperly named Case 75 in Levesque et. al. 2005, so it was just a mistake. Nussun05 (talk) 05:48, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

text: Read the article, all will be revealed.  Lithopsian (talk) 15:50, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

text: Please stop "fixing" things without understanding them first.  The Simbad "unique" nomenclature is not a designation, simply a way to unambiguously refer to a star given a number in a paper.  Nobody ever uses this style to refer to the star, so we shouldn't either (it is even described in Simbad as "Origin of the Acronym: S = Created by Simbad, the CDS Database").  Simbad created that unique designation because people have called the star Case 75 and that is ambiguous, more commonly being used for AT Persei.  Such ambiguous designations might be OK in the right context, but Simbad can't handle them because it needs to be able to identify every star by a unique designation.  Case 75 has been used to refer to V354 Cephei in more than one published paper, including one heavily referenced in the article.  Therefore the situation is described in the body of the article to avoid (or at least reduce!) confusion.  Lithopsian (talk) 20:05, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Case 75 

message: Stop calling V354 Cephei Case 75 just because one paper mistakenly referred to it as Case 75! Wikipedia should have actual facts, not facts based on mistakes, which are not true facts. Nussun05 (talk) 13:52, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Btw, I'm gonna stop reverting edits here, so please do not give me a warn. Nussun05 (talk) 14:32, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

text: We discussed this already, in the previous section of this talk page.  You stopped discussing and re-started editing the article, which is really not the best way to go.  I'll keep the all my actual discussion about this designation in the previous section to avoid confusion.  Lithopsian (talk) 15:22, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please stop trying to turn a mistake into facts.
Talk:V357 Carinae

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
*Comment you need to move the set index to implement this move, and it contains edit history that was merged away as well. -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 05:23, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Post-creole continuum

message: A new variety of Arabic is appearing - Formal Spoken Arabic based on a number of Arabic dialects. This form has neither the complexities of the Literary Arabic (الفصحى (al-)fuṣ-ḥā) nor the particularities of the many Arabic dialects العامية (al-)`āmmiyya (East) or الدارجة (ad-)dārija (West).
The above section I added was deleted, it refers to Arabic acrolect, basilect and the new mesolect, not necessarily Creole languages. --Anatoli (talk) 00:22, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Acrolect, basilect and mesolect phenomena restricted to creole languages, so whatever it is that is arising in Arabic-speaking areas is not a mesolect.  Besides, this page is strictly about creole languages.  — Æµ§œš¹ [aɪm ˈfɻɛ̃ⁿdˡi] 06:09, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arabic: acrolect, basilect mesolect 

message: As far as I can see, numbers 17 an 18 are the same, are they not? Licqua (talk) 12:26, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No.  17 is  and 18 is .  Close, but missing the   — Æµ§œš¹ [aɪm ˈfɻɛ̃ⁿdˡi] 16:44, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Table 

message: The following paragraph quoted next contains dubious unsourced statements. Rather than delete, and because I don't have the time to find sources, but also because I suspect that a definitive sourced answer cannot exist, I've added a couple of words that might induce doubt in a careful reader. Spaceboots1 (talk) 01:02, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: In general, one avoids weasel words.  One should also tag unsourced statements with either  or  if they aren't removed. — Æµ§œš¹ [aɪm ˈfɹ̠ˤʷɛ̃ɾ̃ˡi] 01:54, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

text: I realize this. I gave my justification for my edit. Spaceboots1 (talk) 03:32, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Given your justification, there are other, more appropriate courses of action available. If you come upon a similar situation in the future, I recommend one of those tags. In addition to calling attention for those reading the article, those attempting to address uncited or dubious statements may see  what articles use such templates.  — Æµ§œš¹ [aɪm ˈfɹ̠ˤʷɛ̃ɾ̃ˡi] 04:30, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  I Added Some Weasel Words
Talk:V533 Carinae

message: Where did the name VV Storm come from? VV Storm redirects here and has been in old versions of the list of largest stars. Who came up with it and why?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nussun05 (talk • contribs) 10:11, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks very dodgy.  I can find no evidence for this name being used for this star.  It was created by a user who is now banned as a sockpuppet, which doesn't look so good.  I suggest deleting.  It might qualify under speedy deletion criterion G5.  Lithopsian (talk) 14:56, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  VV Storm
Talk:Juan Gómez-Jurado

message: Carlos Ruiz zafon appears as a living Spanish author but he died 2 years ago 83.59.79.234 (talk) 09:24, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Carlos Ruiz Zafon is dead
Talk:Fanwood, New Jersey

message: Can anyone discuss the history of Fanwood? Eastend 01:03, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: @Eastend Started a history section using the NRHP nomination as a reference. Thanks, Zeete (talk) 13:08, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: History question