lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Nina Valetova

message: Hello Single Purpose Accounts (WP:SPA) that have been editing this page  I have gone through and made an edit of the page, as it was formatted like a CV, and was full of non-notable, and vanity exhibitions and publications. 
Here are a few articles and publications that could potentially be reincorporated as citations to claims made in the article, but should not be put back in the article text itelf, if they are in face deemed to be notable, and verifiable.:
*2011 "Alternative worlds of Nina Valetova", Sergey Kuskov Memorial Website, Moskva (Moscow), Russia
*2011 "Fantasy and Visionary Art of Nina Tokhtaman Valetova", Volochine Publishing Co., U.S.A.
*2011 "Artinvest s.r.l. Galleria d'Arte e casa d'aste", no.32 February–March 2011, p. 154, Art&tra, Italy
*2003 "World from the Other Side", Sergey Kuskov
*2001 "Alternative Worlds of Nina Valetova", Sergey Kuskov
This is an exhibition that I couldn't verify, which could be added back in to the sentence about exhibitions, if it could be verified, and was notable:
*2010-2011  "From history to contemporary", jma Gallery / N Gallery / Euro-Asian Art and Culture Organization, Wien (Vienna), Austria
The issuu link wouldn't load. I'm skeptical because I couldn't find anything about the show, and issuu is self-published, but I have moved it here, in case the issuu link becomes viewable. 
Please do not add revert my edits, or add the content back in without 
#declaring your Wikipedia:Conflict of interest here on the talk page
#discussing your edits here at the talk page first
Thank you Theredproject (talk) 09:16, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I have reverted your edits. Please discuss any changes here on the talk page after you state your WP:COI. Also, all edits need to be verified by WP:RS. Theredproject (talk) 09:47, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article clean up, and Conflict of interest 
Talk:Agenus

message: https://www.thereporter.com/2021/07/09/agenus-purchases-site-in-vacaville-for-biomanufacturing-center/
https://www.bizjournals.com/boston/news/2021/07/08/agenus-vacaville-genentech-biotech-land-sale.html
THe place is named as a biomanufacturing center in California.2601:640:C681:C260:3830:1367:AF47:DADE (talk) 04:56, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Agenus named as a party to buy a site in Vacaville, CA as of July 2021
Talk:Antique shop

message: Please do not delete any of the information I have added for the page. This is for a school project and I will be done with it next week, the 28th of February 2014. You are free to do with it what you want after that date. Thank you very much.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paulareumer (talk • contribs) 15:13, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleting My Edits 

message: Did "Interior of a Jewish antique shop" mean a shop selling Jewish antiques, or a shop owned by Jews selling antiques?  If the latter, what is the point of the assertion about the race and religion of the shop owner?  Kenilworth Terrace (talk) 20:52, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unclear caption 

message: I would like to add in some more information on this page including popular stores and what antiques stores include. It has been some time since it was edited, and I think it could use some new information and news on antique stores. Paulareumer (talk) 04:41, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Edits

message: I'm thinking of merging Charity Shop, Junk shop, Antique shop and Used bookstore into the second-hand shop article. All of them are too fragmented, some stubs, and lots of overlapping material, and I think they'd be better under one more substantial article to explain the concepts and issues more effectively. Views welcomed before I take this on though! ohsimone (talk) 09:18, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: My thought is that Antique shop and Used bookstore are very different stores, while you may find a used in book in an Antique shop it is probably public domain and also available on Wikisource.  You are unlikely to find a wringer washer in a Used book store.  Charity Shop & Junk shop, may be candidates for a merge. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 15:22, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?
Talk:Antoria

message: I edited the original article because it had inaccurate info in it.
I don't think it's advertising when the company in the article went out of business in the early 1980s.
To prove that JT Coppock managed the Antoria brand is not hard because the JT Coppock name is on the labels of the Acoustic guitars.
I suppose it's not an important article so if you really want to delete it then so be it.
Guitarspecs (talk) 14:18, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Its not an important article, nor does it explain why this company is notable, and that is the basis for the speedy delete. Queerbubbles | Leave me Some Love 14:19, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Antoria is a notable Guitar make. The Antoria logo is clearly visible on Noel Gallagher's guitar in Oasis's "Wonderwall" video. Not in and of itself grounds for notability but a sign nevertheless that Antoria was a respectable serious professional guitar manufacturer and not just some source of cheap knock-offs. Dino246 (talk) 01:33, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If that is so, it should be noted in the article... this article does not describe WHY this is a notable company.  I have no clue, how should others who stumble across this?  It should be fixed so that issues dont arise again.  Queerbubbles | Leave me Some Love 17:08, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It used to make a pretty good case for itself explaining Antoria's position as a budget professional guitar manufacturer in the 1970s but it was written in a very informal and unreferenced style and so most of the content was deleted. I'll see what I can dig up. This article is salvageable and it would be a shame to speedily delete it. Dino246 (talk) 17:29, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion
Talk:Anusol

message: Seems a bit strange. It's OTC here in the UK, and I don't remember anyone ever querying that. 81.159.57.7 (talk) 02:12, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's OTC in the US. It's also been rebranded as Tucks Hemorrhoidal Ointment. 72.244.204.134 (talk) 19:02, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why prescription only in U.S.? 

message: While at one point when J&J owned both Tucks and Anusol, there were some co-branded products on the market.  In 2016, Tucks was acquired by Blistex https://www.chaindrugreview.com/blistex-acquires-tucks-brand/.  Since that point, Tucks has not been co-branded with Anusol.   Full disclosure, I am an employee of Blistex.Shnauz17 (talk) 22:36, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tucks No Longer Co-branded with Anusol
Talk:UK Payments Administration

message: Shouldn't the Egg link in "APACS members" link to the "Egg Banking plc" not the generic Egg page ?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.228.251.10 (talk) 14:09, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Egg" link 

message: The statement on chip card work by APACS "APACS pioneered the development of credit cards containing a computer chip. The early APACS work proved the viability of 'chip cards', and helped in the creation of the common EMV (Europay, Mastercard, VISA) standards for such cards" blatantly ignores the fact chip cards had been in use for a much longer time in other countries, particularly in France where they are in use since the 1980s...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jcaron (talk • contribs) 16:00, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes - this is an overblown claim. I deleted it. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 13:17, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chip card work statement 

message: I am not sure entiely how this works, but this article is incorrect. UK Payments is not an APACS replacement. It replaces the Administration company, APACS Administration Limited. It is not a trade association nor is it a membership organisation, nor does it own the stanadrds referenced. The standards in the main are now managed by The UK Cards Association. All the correct information is in the UK Payments web site. Suggest this article is flagged for revision.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.130.61.82 (talk) 15:56, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Disputed

message: This article is factually inaccurate and it would be great if it could be corrected. It seems to be mixing up UK Payments Administration (http://www.ukpayments.org.uk) and Payments UK (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Payments_UK). 
UK Payments Administration is actually a shared service provider that supports a number of payment schemes and trade associations which make up the payments industry in the UK. Isn't, as the article states "a trade organisation" nor is it responsible for the standards mentioned. 
Please see some suggested wording you may consider using instead:
UK Payments Administration Ltd is the service company providing people, facilities and expertise to the UK payments industry. 
It has managed the development and launches of major innovations in payments, such as chip and PIN and Faster Payments. 
The brands it supports manage the systems behind UK payments, and every year these systems process payments nearly four times the value of the world economy. Shanemckenna7 (talk) 15:16, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes required please!
Talk:Aperol

message: What does the coloring come from? Badagnani (talk) 00:50, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Rhubarb is frequently used as a natural food coloring, I would expect it provides all or most of the bright red color. -- 109.255.172.169 (talk) 15:35, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Coloring
Talk:Applicon

message: Tablet stroke recognition was a multi-user problem. An individual could be proficient at the symbols they made and used frequently, but it was less valuable when the strokes to be used were made by someone else. Of the variety and implementations of interfaces I've used, the Applicon tablet strokes are near the bottom of the list for reliability and speed of input.
Tablet stroke recognition was based on normalizing entire strokes and counting crossings on a 3X3 grid. This meant that certain symbols where the crossings occurred near intersections could lead to mistaken creation and unexpected recognition. The symbols shipped with the system had a large number of definitions for some macros in order to increase the chance of acceptance. Sometimes, though, a user defined symbol would be quite close to a supplied one, resulting in unexpected execution. 
The main flaw of the Applicon tablet stroke system was that it was not possible to play symbols back from their 'recognized' form. Without a drawing as guidance for the symbol, it was not possible to avoid these overlaps in recognition. Any scribble could cause some symbol to be recognized and its related macro to be executed, without a warning against potential disaster - such as converting an entire assembly from inches to metric, without knowing the actual symbol, nor being able to identify all the changes made to the database. 
The most frequently used stroke, beyond the trivial, was the mass-random swirl. This was done as there was no way to interrupt a tablet stroke and no one wanted to chance picking one at random.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.238.134.84 (talk) 18:31, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Gary Hornbuckle was a co-founder and was President of Applicon until Donald W. Feddersen replace him and the firm was sold to Schlumberger. Hornbuckle received a Ph. D. from UC Berkeley and later did work at MIT's Lincoln Labs. I believe that Applicon sprang from his work on Project "GENIE" at Berkeley which included a tablet user interface with pattern recognition.
Here is a reference to one of his publications:
Hornbuckle, G.D. (1967). The computer graphics user/machine interface, IEEE Transactions on
Human Factors in Electronics, 8(1), 17 - 20.
68.159.67.90 20:40, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gary Hornbuckle was co-founder and  first president. 
Talk:Applied Data Research

message: This article was already marked as a stub. The limited detail here was (to the best of my knowledge and memory, anyway) accurate, and there are even a couple of citations. So does the  tag add more urgency than the original stub tag? Anyway, User:RandomHumanoid, since you added the tag, how about some discussion here about what is needed? Trevor Hanson 06:46, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Needs a rewrite?" 
Talk:Apress

message: The bulk of this was written by a Juliemiller1. Julie Miller is the name of the Product Manager and main press contact at Apress http://www.apress.com/about/press.html. I feel the advert tag was removed too quickly and I'm going to remove the inessential, extraneous stuff that reads like a company-produced fact sheet. Josephgrossberg 00:25, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Juliemiller1 [[WP:COI]] 

message: I have many books that Apress published. I noticed that they do not have Congress catalog number and all ISNBs start with 1 (instead of 0 for North America). Maybe they are not based inside US?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.74.194.97 (talk) 22:07, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Both 0 and 1 are English language works and you need to drill down to the group code to figure out the country. National agencies for the USA, UK, Australia, Canada, Zimbabwe, etc. get small blocks of numbers and then issue sub-blocks to publishers as needed. Apress' 1590596145 is decoded as 1 (English Language), 590 (USA), 59 (Apress), 614 (assigned by Apress), 5 (checksum). --Marc Kupper|talk 18:21, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  ISBN 

message: I have read some Apress books and really like the company, so I was going to expand the article. After some browsing, however, I noticed that SAMS_Publishing, an even more prominent publisher, was marked for notability, so I am uncertain. I am going to investigate the notability of publishers like this. Should this article be expanded, or should it be expunged?. --David Gannon (talk) 12:02, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think Apress and SAMS are both notable tech publishers. Josephgrossberg (talk) 13:26, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I came here to get information on Apress. Wikipedia should give information, so I assume that Apress is notable. AleyCZ (talk) 02:48, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  In looking at the article, as it stands today, Apress is not notable per WP:GNG and WP:COMPANY. --Marc Kupper|talk 19:09, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expand? Notability? 

message: I landed on this article by being directed from "Friends of ED."  If "Friends of ED" is going to redirect here, there should be some kind of information about that label and how it is related to Apress. As it is, I have no idea why it redirects or how the two are associated. Cnanninga (talk) 15:05, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Friends of ED
Talk:Aqua Velva

message: :On Parris Island, Aqua Velva is often used by Marine recruits, under the direction of their Drill Instructors, to cut the smell of body odor on themselves, and in their barracks.
Someone explain this one to me, please.  Is it really relevant?  Maikel (talk) 10:58, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: As relevant as anything is.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.251.12.20 (talk) 05:31, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Why mention them specifically, and not list everyone else in the world using it? What makes this bit of information actually useful or interesting or in any way more relevant to the topic than anyone else using it? - Alltat (talk) 16:29, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Marines

message: This suggests that Aqua Velva was NEVER a mouthwash: http://theshaveden.com/forums/threads/aqua-velva-mouthwash.19834/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.92.244.192 (talk) 17:54, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I have found no reliable sources stating that Aqua Velva was marketed as a mouthwash. Ads from February 1929 present is as an after-shave to be used in association with Williams' shaving cream: here's a third-party report referencing an April 1929 ad. So I am going to take the mouthwash bit out. Yngvadottir (talk) 18:48, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Mouthwash?

message: Does any one even know how/why the name for the product was originally chosen? What does the name mean?
I've been trying to research these questions without success in finding an answer to them, at least not on Wikipedia. The name is in the Latin language, and aqua means "water" in Latin. But what does velva mean in Latin? I am not finding any answers to this question.
I've tried 10 different Latin dictionaries online. None can find anything for a possible such Latin word as velva.
Google search also did not come up with anything plausible. Any one? Thank you, warshy (¥¥) 20:41, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some basic questions
Talk:Aquascutum

message: http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/206981107
Adelaide Times, Monday 10 September 1849
Comic poem "Idrotobolic hats, and patent aqua scutem over coats."
86.168.56.27 (talk) 18:52, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Earliest Date before 1851 

message: Was aquascutum ever made in Italy 
Thanks James 86.1.194.21 (talk) 02:26, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jumper on e bay
Talk:Boiler room (business)

message: "The boiler room starts the process off as a bridge loan"
This is describing the plot of the Boiler Room (Film) and presenting one particular scam as descriptive of all "boiler room" scams.  Most boiler room stock scams are just pump and dump on low volume, low value stocks, not this IPO related stuff.
Lala6633 (talk) 16:44, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccurate description of stock boiler room? 

message: There was another $AUD30M boiler room scam bust on the Gold Coast today June 14, 2017 if someone wants to do the update to the relevant section on this article. Dr.khatmando (talk) 06:06, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gold Coast
Talk:Arabia (brand)

message: Could someone knowledgeable add the pronunciation of "Arabia" the company?  --Macrakis (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 22:17, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciation
Talk:Christianity in Myanmar

message: This is a great start on the history of Christianity in Burma. I updated the Adoniram Judson article to contain all of the same information that is presented here. Now we have a bit of duplication going on. Judson deserves to be represented here, but this is almost like a duplicate article. The next thing that needs to be done is a well-crafted summary of his life to replace the duplicate bio that exists here. There is also a greater need for more current history, persecution etc. Brian0324 21:17, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adoniram Judson 

message: Here's a link to a newspaper report on the persecution of Christians in Burma that could be used as a source for expanding this article: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/1540121/Burma-%27orders-Christians-to-be-wiped-out%27.html. —Angr 15:37, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible source 
Talk:Arbuthnot Latham

message: This section reads like an advert for the company, with the second paragraph containing no sources.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.7.64.99 (talk) 11:26, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV dispute [Details]

message: Hi All, I'm planning to improve this article over the coming week or two. I have read a number of articles about the company and will be writing further information where possible and improving the overall look and feel. Thanks Biggleswiki (talk) 10:02, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rework 
Talk:ARC International

message: This reads like an advert.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.133.157.236 (talk) 15:50, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advert 

message: I was suspicious of the suggestion that their first CEO was Sideshow Bob from the Simpsons... but it turns out to be true.  Well, it turns out to be his real name anyway.  See for instance this press release from their website about their 3rd quarter results for y2000, cached on archive.org:
http://web.archive.org/web/20030714151148/ww6.investorrelations.co.uk/arc/press/Arc.htm
82.6.108.62 (talk) 02:54, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Bob Terwilliger" 

message: "Unlike most embedded microprocessors you can add extra instructions, registers and functionality as if they were made from Lego."
: Is this some king of typo? It links to the article about Lego building toys. 138.47.159.132 (talk) 06:34, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  This core is configurable; so it has some optional blocks which can be added or removed from project. It is compared with LEGO because it is easy to reconfigure a core. `a5b (talk) 21:05, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "LEGO" 

message: "Semiconductor company licensees of ARC products ship approximately 300 million chips containing ARC processor cores every year."
Is it actual information? Eetimes says that total cpu market was 10 bln of cores in 2011 and ARC had 10% of this market. `a5b (talk) 21:05, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  300 mln 

message: Is this company more or less directly owned by Intel? I find it a bit implausible that Intel would include an ARC core in most of their chipsets (as Intel Management Engine) unless Intel had some good hold on the ARC company itself. Someone not using his real name (talk) 14:28, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intel?
Talk:Arcadia Brewing Company

message: Arcadia produced another porter called London Porter.   Jszigeti (talk) 11:01, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing product
Talk:Archives & Museum Informatics

message: Please note: i am a partner in Archives & Museum Informatics. 
Edits by an unknown user:user:Museumstaff10 in September 2010 attracted coi tags from user: Teapotgeorge on this and the Museums and the Web article. We have no knowledge of who Museumstaff10 is, and this person has no connection with Archives & Museum Informatics. I requested on Teapotgeorge's user page that the revisions please be reversed, and this has happened on one article but not the other. If there are no objections, we should revert them here as well. Thanks. --Jtrant (talk) 03:58, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  coi: MuseumStaff
Talk:Ma Jun (mechanical engineer)

message: I just expanded the article, which was merely a stub before. I find it to be somewhat appalling that it's taken this long for someone to give honors to one of the greatest mechanical engineers of all time. Western bias, perhaps? Lol. Just kidding (besides, I'm White Irish, hah).
--PericlesofAthens 06:22, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Um..I think the lengthy discussion of the South Pointing Chariot here may have veered off-topic way too much. That information belongs more in the South Pointing Chariot article than here, I think. _dk 10:03, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If there are no objections, I'll do the necessary move soon. _dk 21:55, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Off-topic
Talk:Tennis games

message: This article is taken directly from the USTA website.  Someone has taken the time to change enoguh of the wording so it is not verbatim.
I know this is directly from the site as I wrote it and even named one of the games ("All position doubles") myself with my co-workers.
Why isn't a direct link at least given to the page this was taken from?  www.usta.com/top10games .  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.213.20.152 (talk) 20:03, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  this is taken from the usta website
Talk:Armi Jager

message: Armi Jager military replicas have appeared as props in movies (the original "Dawn of the Dead" for instance). They were recommended for security use as less-lethal than a full-caliber firearm while appearing to be such (however I have found no documentation on their use as a deterrent). The primary interest appears to have been among collectors or military history buffs. Naaman Brown (talk) 20:31, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  uses of the Armi Jager military replicas
Talk:Armor Holdings

message: Added due its significant pioneering contributions to aviation safety.--THE FOUNDERS INTENT TALK 14:51, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Simula, Inc. 