lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Collotype

message: The last paragraph is simply incorrect. It describes not collotype, but collagraph.
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collagraphy). I have deleted it.
Ian (talk) 19:54, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: I added a Historical Background to the page. I added what I saw was not present in the article at the time of adding to the article. TKilta (talk) 18:00, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes 

message: In the Historical Background section it's mentioned that "Collotype" was invented in 1855, yet the MoMa alleges that it has a sample of collotype from 1851.
https://www.moma.org/collection/works/54162
I reached out to MoMA to see what their theories were regarding this item, but due to the pandemic, they're unable to examine the object in person. I'll follow up with them again in the future and will post any relevant information. Thellomerca (talk) 23:29, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible incorrect fact?
Talk:Military ranks and insignia of Norway

message: As a non-Norwegian speaker, I feel I cannot comment on the accuracy and quality of this article, since it is basically all in Norwegian. I think someone needs to translate more of the terminology used here, and keep in mind this is suppose to be an English article.
:All NATO ranks are easily compared using the NATO rank system. If we were to use the English names for the Norwegian ranks in this article half the purpose of having it is gone. If we were to add translations to the Norwegian ranks should we use British or United States military ranks? Inge 14:40, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is supposed to be an English article about a Norwegian phenomenon. The article links to a publication by the Norwegian Department of Defence, where the English translations can be seen. I did add a few translations of the more unique parts. krikkert (Talk) 23:08, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe this can help? Should be easy to read for everybody.  --83.108.136.173 22:53, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The enlisted navy insignias are outdated, and the OR4+ level is taken out. Look in the Norwegian article for correct updates. Znuddel (talk) 20:22, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Outdated insignias
Talk:Josephine Tey

message: Her name is sometimes (e.g. in my version of The Man in the Queue) spelled MacKintosh (with a capital K). ChKa 14:22, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: I put in cross-references; An Expert In Murder came up red, but it exists.
Rogersansom (talk) 11:32, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cross Refs 

message: I corrected an error, and added a TV adaptation.
Rogersansom (talk) 14:56, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: My Edit

message: Shouldn't the reference to something by Barbara Mertz be less prominent, presumably in the section on related works?
Rogersansom (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 17:10, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I did it, but please feel free to be bold and make other improvements yourself. Rivertorch (talk) 18:34, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Mertz misplaced?

message: On Oct 1st 2020, I deleted the bolding of her birth name in the lede, since it is an unlikely search-term, and distracts from the two names she used in professional life, both correctly set in bold. This was soon reverted with no reason given. I suggest reinstating. Valetude (talk) 02:25, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth name 

message: The article states that Tey's friend John Gielgud read about her death in The Times at a matinée during his run in The Winter's Tale. Tey's obituary in that publication appeared on 15 February 1952, whereas the play had closed by then. Anybody know where this came from, or should it be deleted as too much information?
--217.155.32.221 (talk) 08:34, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.--217.155.32.221 (talk) 11:18, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death notice and John Gielgud 

message: “These novels are set in the same fictional 20th-century Britain as the Inspector Grant novels.”
In what way are her books set in a “fictional” Britain? Am I missing some thing? Otherwise I will change it to say they are set in 20th C Britain. Ivesiana (talk) 20:39, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fictional Britain?
Talk:West Branch Susquehanna Valley

message: What is the basis on only including the river valley east of Lock Haven? I would think the whole West Branch Susquehanna River valley would qualify. A quick Google search for "West Branch Susquehanna Valley" found only 40 entries, most of which were from Wikipedia or forks. Just curious, Ruhrfisch 02:24, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Question
Talk:Date rolling

message: The `Actual` convention prescribes that the payments on non-business days are not rolled. In which markets is the Actual convention used?
I think it is relevant to answer this question because it seems strange that payments be done on a non-business day and because other lists of business conventions that I have seen do not include the `Actual` convention. No comprehensive list is needed. One example would be enough.
Rodolfoaoviedoh (talk) 21:48, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  In which markets is the Actual convention used?
Talk:Feedforward neural network

message: The last paragraph in Single-layer Perceptron seems irrelevant and out of place since it's solely about Multi-layer Perceptrons. It should be in the next section. --134.100.6.103 (talk) 12:53, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  slp 

message: This is a very basic page and I am hoping to update it.  Paskari 14:26, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: overview

message: Stanford: What's so cool about feed-forward networks?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.128.58.224 (talk) 04:03, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  broken link 

message: Currently in the text there is no connection between the ADELINE chapter and the previous chapters, what does ADELINE do for ff-nn? I think the part should be removed or expanded to make that connection. (Background, I'm a MSc level Computer Science student)
82.157.46.201 (talk) 14:11, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  ADELINE part 
Talk:Nobody Else

message: I think it would significant enough to mention that this their only US-charted album at #69. 85.217.40.33 (talk) 02:53, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Total (Total album)

message: I added a link to the album by the same name by norwegian Seigmen. IMO, the two ought to switch places - this one should be renamed "Total (Total album)" while the Seigmen record ought to get the "Total (album)" space; on the simple grounds that it was released two years earlier. --80.212.164.163 (talk) 21:06, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seigmen Total
Talk:Sea Scouts (The Scout Association)

message: Needs refs. Rlevse 15:58, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Added references... Horus Kol 14:31, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Attention tag

message: This article implies that the defaced ensign is the flag of UK Sea Scouts.  However, the defaced ensign should only be flown by Royal Navy Recognised Sea Scouts.  This should be clarified.
See the rules on the Scout Association's resource web site: http://www.scoutbase.org.uk/library/hqdocs/por/2006/chapter_12.htm  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.169.147.117 (talk) 11:38, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks to me like this is clearly discussed in the section Royal Navy Recognition.  --— Gadget850 (Ed) talk -  13:59, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, I meant to say that having the defaced ensign at the top of the page implies that it is the flag of UK Sea Scouts rather than RN Recognised Sea Scouts. 80.169.147.117 (talk) 12:01, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I added a caption to the image- let me know if this is correct.  BTW- "defaced" pretty much means vandalized in U.S. English.  --— Gadget850 (Ed) talk -  13:00, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That looks fine now.  Generally defaced does refer to vandalism, but in this instance is used to refer to a flag that has been changed to include a particular logo or design.  The original flag is the Red Ensign and the Royal Navy has given permission for RN Recognised Scouts to include the Scout logo on it. 80.169.147.117 (talk) 11:52, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Flag

message: Proper name is Sea Scouts and should disambiguate to The Scout Association.  --— Gadget850 (Ed) talk -  18:53, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I would agree with you if I could find a reference.  I poked around ScoutBase quite a bit and can't lock it down either way.  Programme references are to Beaver Scouts, Scouts, Sea Scouts and so on, and then it will mention Scouting, Explorer Scouting, etc.  I can't find a formal style guide.  The BSA is more explicit both on their website  and their style guide .  I have no preference here— it just needs to be cleaned up and we need to use the same naming on all of the sections: Beaver Scouting, Scouting, Explorer Scouting.   --— Gadget850 (Ed) talk -  22:12, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename
Talk:Dry plate

message: This should be incorporated into a larger article on the evolution of photography. As it is, even with significant editing, it is ambiguous and contains unattributed assertions.
 --NameThatWorks 21:46, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. It should be merged into photographic plate. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 19:33, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Not very good as a stand-alone

message: This claim should be reconsidered: "Dry plate, also known as gelatin process, is the first economically successful durable photographic medium..." Certainly the wet-plate process and the Daguerreotype would qualify as would the calotype. Rncooper (talk) 21:38, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rethink claim of precedence 

message: We second Rncooper. The thousands who made a living in pre-dry plate technologies--daguerreotypes, ambrotypes, tintypes, collodion glass, paper--not successful? Nor such objects--paper which could last centuries properly cared for, daguerreotypes conceivably into the next millennium--durable?
--Jim Luedke  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimlue (talk • contribs) 00:16, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Roger that
Talk:Tarantula Nebula

message: The reference to R136a should be to R136, which is the term used in the cited reference #3. This is doubly unfortunate since the
information in article R136a also applies only to R136. R136 is called a super star cluster in
.
This reference  explains how R136 is the centre of 30 Doradus (another name for the Tarantula Nebula) and R136a is one of several components of R136.
I don't think a separate article on the component R136a is warranted, rather that R136 could mention it with references.
So I've gone ahead and changed the reference. Puzl bustr (talk) 12:33, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: R136a wrong reference

message: I cut-and-pasted the pictures, starting from the overlapping one, to put them after the overlapping text. Puzl bustr (talk) 16:45, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed overlapping text and piccy

message: I corrected the diameter reference for R136 using a more precise reference. The previously given diameter was that of R136a, the central blob. I think the original reference, which is much more general and not talking just about R136, actually made a mistake, confusing R136 and R136a, as mentioned above. The R136 article has a diagram giving this distance also. The reference I gave stated that 8" was 2 parsec in the picture, which was 35" by 35", hence (2 parsec being about 7 light years) the diameter I gave was 35 light years. It's only approximate, of course.Puzl bustr (talk) 13:55, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Corrected diameter reference

message: With VFTS 682 determined to have 150 solar masses, it'd be a good time to expand the info here , and/or, create an article about this star.
http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/ESO_VLT_Finds_a_Brilliant_but_Solitary_Superstar_999.html
65.94.44.141 (talk) 16:53, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: VFTS 682

message: While I'm aware that the diameter of nebulas are somewhat difficult to define, different values should not be off by as much as a factor of two or more. The radius is given as 300ly, the distance as 160kly. An object with the diameter of 600ly at that distance has apparent dimensions of 13 arcminutes. Yet the given apparent dimensions are larger by a factor of two to three. So either the apparent dimensions, or the radius, as given, is wrong. Somebody can look into this?WikiPidi (talk) 08:54, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Properties box: diameter of nebula 

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that :File:30 Doradus, Tarantula Nebula.jpg, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for May 14, 2024. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2024-05-14. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you!  — Amakuru (talk) 14:56, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured picture scheduled for POTD
Talk:Frédéric Leclercq

message: "Frédéric also is the only member of DragonForce to have facial hair. He is featured the least in the band's videos as of recently."
What is the point of stuff like this? I'm deleting it. 136.2.1.153 14:44, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, it is pretty pointless. --Dayn 14:49, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yeah it was added 3 three days ago, and no one else seemed to have noticed it then. Feel free to remove stuff like that if you see any, you don't need to discuss it when it is so obviously a load of crap. Thanks. IronChris  |  (talk) 14:59, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, bassists are always featued least. 11:22, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

text: Leclercq has been in several notable bands, that's why he has his own article. ×××BrightBlackHeaven(talk)××× 21:53, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Useless information

message: Does anybody have a better photo - the current one is really blurry?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.175.56.103 (talk) 13:17, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo 

message: Is anyone able to re-upload this image, please? It is owned by Jake Owens. JakeOwensPhoto (talk) 21:42, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fred Photo
Category talk:BBC Micro and Acorn Electron games

message: Quite a few games appear to be missing off this list, not least the (excellent) Level 9 creations, as mentioned here, amongst other places :-
http://www.bbcmicrogames.com/other.html
15.203.169.125 14:44, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

message: There was a game I would play frequently when I had booked some time on the BBC in the local library in around 1991 and I swear that game is called "Dragon Egg".  I seem to be unable to find any information about it at all on the Internet.  Have any of you heard of it before?  I'd like to see a few screen shots ideally and maybe get an emulated version.  I remember that it was in two parts.  To get into the second part you needed to know that the password was "ogweb", which is Bewgo spelt backwards.  You seemed to come across a wall very often and had to decide whether to climb it or go underneath it.  Anyway, if anyone has any information, can they post it here please?  Thanks!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.3.145.0 (talk) 02:59, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dragon Egg
Talk:Aleksander Ford

message: The first mentioned movie was a revolutionary movie about Jews and workers in pre-war Poland, the second one was about problems of socialist Poland, I'm not sure if any Jews were mentioned in it. It would be nice to rewrite the sentence.
Xx236 14:48, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Ford did use his films to voice

message: Ford divorced his wife Elinor on February 20, 1980 in Collier, Florida; where he would die a few weeks later. He was buried in Naples Memorial Gardens Cemetery. His grave marker is inscribed with a cross and the dedication "Jesteś z nami" (You are with us).--ארינמל (talk) 04:10, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Death
Talk:Dicalcium phosphate

message: I've also seen this called Calcium Acid Phosphate. Eddietoran 14:49, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Woo hoo

message: Why was this redirected to Woo Hoo? "When a reader enters this term and pushes "Go", what article would they most likely be expecting to view as a result?". I personally don't expect (and don't expect others to expect) to get an article on a 1950s pop song.--Nonpareility 15:01, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've unredirected it.--Nonpareility 17:24, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm re-redirecting it.  None of the other dab entries have articles of their own. -- JHunterJ (talk) 13:20, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirection
Category talk:Ancient Greek art

message: This category and the Ancient Greek sculpture, Ancient Greek pottery etc really need tidying into Prehistoric, Bronze Age, Archaic, and Classical.  Periodisation in art history also suggests 'Ancient Greek' art and 'Hellenistic' art are distinctive and shouldn't overlap as much as they do here - for example, Hellenistic is not merely in Greece, whereas 'Ancient Greek' suggests (apart from Magna Grecia and the Asia colonies) only the Greek mainland and islands.
I'ld suggest sub-cats (maybe including 'Hellenistic art', but that should also be a sub-cat of 'Classical art' in its own right) by period, using this one as a root category.
I've made a start, but any help or thoughts would be useful. Neddyseagoon - talk 15:04, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have to say, however, that Hellenistic Art is also a very dangerous term - it covers such a vast area and time period.  I do realise also, though, that terms like baroque and rococo which have been applied are also inappropriate.  No modern differentiation will ever satisfy how the ancients saw their own art - as a fluid motion, especially through time... after all, they didn't wake up one day and think "I'm going to be a Hellenistic artist today;" rather it was an organic process.  Just something to think about, if a little rambled.  Pjmc 19:31, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Terence Dolan

message: As an occasional contributor to the Hiberno-English archive, I'm puzzled why all links to it seem not to work now.  This includes the one at the end of this article.  I understand Terry Dolan was unwell some time ago, and I wonder if this is the reason why the site is down.  It seems a shame that such a valuable resource might just fade away. Pavel (talk) 09:38, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hiberno-English Archive website 
Talk:Turkey in the Eurovision Song Contest

message: Someone needs to rewrite this. For examples, this section under '1990s' 
"After the free language rule was re-introduced in 1999, the first Turkish entry to be partially sung in English was at the 2000 contest. Turkey reached the top 10 for a second time since 1986, and landed in the top three for the first time, making it the most successful result for the country until its victory in 2003." 
1. Mentioning 2000 in a section about 1990s and then referring to 1986 and 2003 is extremely confusing.
2. It says they reached the top 10 for the second time in 1986, but then talks about finishing 3rd place. They were 3rd in 1997, not 1986 (9th).
3. Grammar needs improvement throughout the entire page. 2A02:8309:2183:7800:FDDB:2998:47CF:9337 (talk) 11:31, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poor English / confusing structure
Talk:Bulgarian minority in Greece

message: What sources do you want? I have many, but they are only in Bulgarian. :( Komita 15:08, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: Please see WP:V, WP:CITE and WP:RS. How do I know that what is said in the article is true? Do any other independent encyclopedias confirm anything? Do any human rights organizations? Does anyone other than Bulgarian nationalists? Boue's map is no good - we are talking about Greece today in 2006. There have been population exchanges, civil wars etc since then.--Euthymios 15:25, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Speculation. The subject is more than adequately dealt with at the Christian Slav speakers section at Minorities in Greece. FYROM claims they are "Macedonians", Serbia claims they are Serbs, Bulgaria claims they are Bulgarians, yet the overwhelming majority of them consider themselves Greeks (Garkomani).--Euthymios 15:39, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  This territory has been Bulgarian for many years, there was no Macedonian nation until 1944 and the Serb`s claims are false. Some sources say that there are 500 000 bulgarians in Aegean Macedonia.
Have you been to Edessa? The people there are afraid to speak Bulgarian because they will loose their job, or will be killed, like prof. Blagoj Shklifof, who proved is some books that the Slavs there are in fact Bulgarians. Komita 15:45, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

text: Oh I've been to Edessa, everyone was speaking Greek. However, I don't see any proof for your claims. Why are the Serb claims false and not the Bulgarian ones? Which sources say there is such a high Bulgarian minority in Greece? Human Rights Watch maybe? Or the ATAKA party in Bulgaria maybe? There are more sources saying that it is an "ethnic Macedonian" minority than a Bulgarian one, however the last time it was officially recognized, it was recognized as a Serbian minority. I think it's time to respect the feelings of the people themselves who identify as Greeks (anyone claiming otherwise has never gained public support in Macedonia or Thrace).--Euthymios 15:52, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Komita
Talk:President of Turkey

message: 198.60.5.145 (talk) 20:25, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.todayszaman.com/national_criticized-for-lavishness-ak-saray-may-make-it-to-guinness-records_361924.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  John of Reading (talk) 11:49, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: I placed a tag on the article saying more references are needed. Several sections of the article do not appear to have references. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 16:01, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  More references needed 

message: Please semi protect this article indifinately because someone keeps removing image in infobox.194.146.157.55 (talk) 13:56, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi Protect 
Talk:Letsrecycle.com

message: Remove speedy delete & hangon tags - plenty here now. - Tiswas(t/c) 15:38, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: csd=
Talk:Cap and Share

message: This is a good start, but we need a lot more detail for a good wikipedia page.
Will Howard 15:14, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: More please - and re advertising 