lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:2 Enoch

message: Could anyone add an explanation of why this text is apocryphal rather than canonical, or otherwise expand on its history?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.80.24.63 (talk) 00:18, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Old Church Slavonic is a language. — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 13:08, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, but Slavonic is not  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.150.224.69 (talk) 17:10, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: 1
Talk:Book of Noah

message: , let's take a break from your battle with TGeorge. I'm trying to understand what you mean by saying that the Book of Noah is "the second book within Genesis." I suspect you're talking about the toledoths - if you go the article on the Book of Genesis and read the Structure section, you'll see the toledoths explained. There are eleven toledoths in Gensis, and the  "toledoth of Noah" is one of them. If this is what you mean, then there is a great confusion here, because the Book is Noah that this article is talking about has nothing to do with the Book of Genesis.Achar Sva (talk) 10:23, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which Book of Noah?
Talk:Assumption of Moses

message: There's the text "whats up cracker" on the page that I don't know how to get rid of. Yed79 (talk) 15:09, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: ?? Try to load the page directly from Wiki, not using google cache. A ntv (talk) 16:34, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Ascension of Isaiah

message: : added some information from E. Norelli (Faculté de Théologie Protestante, Genève) text referenced A ntv (talk) 20:33, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: The formal title of M. A. Knibb's work in The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha, vol. 2, 1985 is Martyrdom and Ascension of Isaiah (Second Century B.C.-Fourth Century A.D.)" It is kind of hard for him to be saying that entire work was written in  AD 150 and 200 when the very title puts parts in the "Second Century B.C."--174.99.238.22 (talk) 12:28, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formal title of Knibb's work 

message: According to Brian E. Daley, SJ, Saint Melito of Sardis is ", the Christian author of the Ascension of Isaiah, and the authors of V Ezra, The Odes of Solomon, and The Letter on the Martyrs of Lyon and Vienne (who may be the young Irenaeus himself)." (DOI 10.1093/jts/45.1.298, freely available here).
The current WP article doesn't mention Melito yet. The source may be cited as a possible authorship of the text.Philosopher81sp (talk) 11:53, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible authorship of Melito of Sardis 

message: The second half of the last sentence of this section is gibberish, but since I've no idea what it should say, I don't want to try and rescue it.Nick Barnett (talk) 20:50, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dating of the text
Talk:Apocalypse of Elijah

message: ==Untitled==
I’m afraid there’s a pretty big mistake in the article. The Hebrew Sefer Elijah (Book of Elijah), which was studied by Moses Buttenwieser ad A. Jellinek has nothing to do with coptic Apocalypse of Elijah. It’s simply totally different book. The only common thing is Elijah as a prophet, but there are many other books, wher Elijah is mentioned as a prophetic figure. --Thomazzo (talk) 14:19, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: You are right. Be free to explain this issue in the Article, or to split the Article in two. A ntv (talk) 16:12, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  A mistake? 

message: I’m afraid there’s a pretty big mistake in the article. The Hebrew Sefer Elijah (Book of Elijah), which was studied by Moses Buttenwieser ad A. Jellinek has nothing to do with coptic Apocalypse of Elijah. It’s simply totally different book. The only common thing is Elijah as a prophet, but there are many other books, wher Elijah is mentioned as a prophetic figure. --Thomazzo (talk) 14:19, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: You are right. Be free to explain this issue in the Article, or to split the Article in two. A ntv (talk) 16:12, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Template talk:Decadebox BC

message: Years should run from 1-10 as it does in List of years, not 0-9. Donnie Love 02:19, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

message: OK, I need help.  Why is the BC small, and why is AD/CE/whatever there at all?  Because of the decision to move the "n00s BC" decades to a less ambiguous "n09–n00 BC", the decade links need to be generated by a template.  I see no history here as to why the (originally CE) was on the later years.  I suspect the BC is small because the box size expanded otherwise, but I could be wrong.  — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 17:24, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Formatting
Talk:Jethro Wood House

message: Hello,
I'm attempting to add updated images to the Jethro Wood House page. The home has been owned by our parents for 40 years and we have some lovely photos to contribute that were taken on the inside, as well as an updated image of the outside. The current photo was taken more than two decades ago. I've spent several hours today trying to change the current photo and add more, but have managed only to add some of my photos to Wikimedia Commons. If anyone is able to add them to the Jethro Wood House page in my stead, I would very much appreciate it!
Thank you!
Jillgomez37 (talk) 22:13, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updating images on the Jethro Wood House page
Category talk:Old Testament apocrypha

message: Please give an explanation in the edit summary when removing categories. Why this one?  – Fayenatic London 21:14, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ancient Christian texts 

message: I found that this category included a lot of pseudepigrapha, and some but not all of the deuterocanonical books and :Category:Anagignoskomena. 
I split this to a new sub-category :Category:Old Testament pseudepigrapha so that we could see what was left directly in it. 
I also decided to remove the selection of articles from this one that were (correctly) in the sub-categories :Category:Deuterocanonical books and :Category:Anagignoskomena, e.g.  
 I understand that you have reverted the latter set of edits. Please can we take them out again? – at least for the deuterocanon. 
It may be that :Category:Anagignoskomena is not very helpful; it could be nominated for merging as suggested at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2017_October_1#Category:Texts_only_found_in_the_Septuagint. – Fayenatic London 21:23, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello and sorry for the late response, I agree that :Category:Anagignoskomena isn't useful but I disagree that :Category:Old Testament apocrypha should be hidden as I see it as a NPOV issue. The disputed books which Catholic and Orthodox Christians define as scripture the Protestants and non denominational Christians do not. — JudeccaXIII (talk) 03:28, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  The category has been purged following the above discussion, perhaps by user:Black Falcon. See now Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2017_November_12#Category:Anagignoskomena for a further proposal. – Fayenatic London 23:10, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Correct, based on the CfD discussion, I purged :Category:Texts in the Septuagint of any articles that were in :Category:Anagignoskomena or its subcategories—here's the list of edits. -- Black Falcon (talk) 02:19, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:   See also Category talk:Deuterocanonical books. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:37, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of sub-categories
Talk:Order of the Immaculate Conception of Vila Viçosa

message: The name of this order is given inconsistantly through this article.  The correction translation of the name of the order from Portuguese is obviously the 'Order of Our Lady of the Immaculate Conception of Vila Vicosa', even though theologically the term the 'Immaculate Conception of Our Lady' would make more sense, i.e., a conception is an event predicated of a person, not a person of a conception.  In other words, the Virgin Mary did not immaculately conceive herself 67.52.199.50 (talk) 21:16, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Correct Name of the Order?

message: As one has probably notices, it is difficult to obtain references that are not in Italian or Portuguese. Most of the English references only pertain to individuals who have received the knighthood. It is hoped that other people will work on this topic.
2008-6-26 Prof. Carl Edwin Lindgren,FWAAS 
Royalhistorian (talk) 05:07, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I would not be surprised if the references in other languages also were similar. Have you actually seen them? Before  trying to find them it would be useful to know if any of them providedsignificantinformation to  show the impotance.DGG (talk) 17:35, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Adding References
Talk:TDVision

message: User_talk:NawlinWiki#TDVision_Systems_Popular_Consensus
User_talk:NawlinWiki#TDVision_Systems_Redesign
3dtech 02:31, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  TDVision Consensus 

message: We are calling the TDVisor here a "Personal Viewer" We may need to make a page for that. The distinction between this and an HMD is that a personal viewer is not mounted on the head. 
3dtech 02:24, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personal Viewer 

message: This article is not encyclopedic content, it looks completely like a promotional text written by the company itself. It contains unverified and I'd say wrong statements. If not deleted, the article should be modified to just say this is a company working on this and that.
It does not explain why it is so notable, what the difference with other HMDs is, other than saying this is way better, you won't get a headache. The statement about users not noticing the difference with the real world is unaceptable.
From all I've read, TDVisor is yet another HMD: it is stereoscopic just like many others, it uses LCOS displays just like many others, it has an alleged 720p resolution (there are worse, similar and better HMDs). Don't see anything notable apart from being [when it comes out] supposedly an XGA or similar resolution HMD bellow $2000. Well, the model about to come out is only 800x600, which is not notable at all.
Comparing it to polarizing glasses, shutter glasses, etc. as the article and TDVision's website do is misleading, as comparing apples to oranges. They claim to be the first to present separate images to each eye. Wrong! The HMD was already invented. Actually there is potential flicker as LCOS usually uses sequential color (a bit like DLP projectors).
--Aseguralasa (talk) 18:35, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Looks like advertising
Talk:Mass (mass spectrometry)

message: I have seen numerous cases of articles on chemical compounds in Wikipedia containing the "property" exact mass.
I would appreciate it is someone could explain why this is NOT vandalism.  Few if any chemical compounds exist as combinations of single isotopes.  So the inclusion of "exact mass" if profoundly misleading.  If used, the isotopic composition should also be listed. It is just wrong.71.31.153.56 (talk) 23:10, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Exact mass is indeed only a property of a specific isotopic composition. This does not necessarily imply that the property is invalid for any chemical compound that is naturally a mixture of "isotopomers" (the compound but a specific isotopic composition thereof).  The property is only valid when referring to a specific isotopomer. Frequently, and when not further specified, "exact mass" implicitly refers to the "monoisotopic exact mass". The monoisotopic mass is the mass of the isotopomer that consists exclusively of the most abundant isotope of each element and thus there is only one monoisotopic mass for each elemental composition and thus chemical compound. Note that monoisotopic mass is not implicitly exact and is frequently experimental. Frequently, monoisotopic masses are referred to as "accurate masses" since high resolution is required to resolve isotopes and thus the measurement thereof is frequently accurate, but not exact. Exact mass is exact and a unique fundamental property of each elemental composition (in the most common monoisotopic exact mass case), or of each isotopomer in the more specific isotopic case. The "monoisotopic exact mass" is the only mass property for chemicals that is unique and invariable. That said these issues are fairly uncommon and perhaps inappropriate outside of mass spectrometry and maybe particle physics (where isotopic mass is more common, since usually lone isotopes are used).--Nick Y. (talk) 14:26, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Exact Mass
Talk:Pass the Mic

message: The opening of "Pass the Mic" sounds like "The Ballad of You and Me and Pooneil" by the Jefferson Airplane. Is it sampled from there? --JohnnyLurg (talk) 05:43, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jefferson Airplane sample?
Talk:The Burning Giraffe

message: This painting is usually heavily linked with the spanish civil war, (See Robert Decharmes Dali for ex.) and not often with the Femme-coccyx and Freud, or at least, not as a primary interpretation. v_atekor (talk) 11:13, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Civil war 

message: My art teacher in high school discussed this painting. Would have been about 1968. He made the point that whilst the TITLE of the painting is "burning giraffe", it isnt the main "part" of the painting. He used this to introduce the concept that paintings (indeed, all art) are INTERPRETATIONS, and not literal, like photographs. 2001:8003:E490:7D01:ADD8:39B6:67E2:76FB (talk) 03:05, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The concept of the "subject" of the painting.
Talk:Led Zeppelin bootleg recordings

message: sorry, but the most bootlegged band is the grateful dead, and the most recorded band is also the gratelful dead, and the most recorded guitar player is, what a wonder, jerry garcia of the grateful dead.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.173.230.15 (talk) 22:20, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. In that instance it is an authorized bootleg, a standard term for artist-permitted recordings aside from the legally licensed product. Regardless, any claim for "most bootlegged artist" would need to be reliably sourced. / edg ☺ ☭ 01:28, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  most bootlegged band 

message: Tympani for the butter queen should be removed from the "Early bootlegs" section. To my knowledge. It was never released as an LP, only on CD.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.88.203.33 (talk) 19:13, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Tympani for the Butter Queen': removal
Talk:A Life Less Ordinary (song)

message: This article needs some  sources, if possible. It has a lot of good information and is otherwise good enough for a  Good Article nomination. --NormalAsylum (t) 06:28, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment 
Talk:Maccabi Rishon LeZion

message: Following the pattern of Maccabi Tel Aviv and Maccabi Haifa, this should not be a disambiguation page. Nick Number (talk) 18:56, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  should not be a dab 

message: For whoever begins the WP:DABCONCEPT article here, there was an  before it was a dab. Also check out a  of a duplicate article. Unfortunately, there are no sources in either of them. — Gorthian (talk) 05:17, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old version that might be useful
Talk:Block wargame

message: A lot of the Command and Colors games do use blocks but quite a few do not (eg the Great War). More important all of them can be played without using blocks and using figures instead of blocks for the Ancients Command and Colors is quite common. Block wargames strictly speaking is a game that uses blocks to create a fog of war. As such L'Attack has far more in common with Block wargames than Command and Colors.Dejvid (talk) 12:49, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Command and Colors not a block wargame
Talk:Universidad Tecnológica de Santiago

message: What does "The curricula of different levels, are consistent with the nature that makes up each of the areas, and the number of credits established" mean? Thatsme314 (talk) 23:15, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: also "the November 12, 1974 begins its formal this educational institution" Thatsme314 (talk) 23:25, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

text: also "UTESA was the first private university in the Dominican Republic to offer a night time." Thatsme314 (talk) 23:26, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

text: also "On June 17, 1978, by Decree 3432 of the Executive Branch is authorized" Thatsme314 (talk) 23:26, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

text: also "In 1979, responding to new demands, expanding its curricular offerings, for the development of the career of Health Sciences, with the advice of American Universities of Ohio, South Carolina and Grenada." Thatsme314 (talk) 23:27, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing sentence
Talk:Heron Creek Middle School

message: It surprises me that there is an article for Heron Creek Middle School but not North Port High School. GO-PCHS-NJROTC (talk) 17:21, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: The infobox says that there is approximately 1300 students at HCMS, but the opening paragraph says that there's >2,000. Which number is correct? PCHS-NJROTC (Messages) 04:24, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflicting information
Talk:El-Gölü

message: There are no letters as "ö" or "ü" in English alphabet, therefore, for an English speaker, the word "Gölü" is not clear to read or pronounce. I would suggest to use English characters as "El-Gulu" or "El-Golu" for this place. Iranianson (talk) 22:23, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: English Characters and problems with "ö" or "ü"  
Talk:Hospital Food (song)

message: Moved the article about the song to Hospital Food (Single). Rathfelder (talk) 13:40, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: @Rathfelder Is (Single) correct? - Seasider53 (talk) 13:46, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved
Talk:Norton Records

message: 3-20-2016 -- Added some information -- series the label has undertaken, Kicks Books releases, and updated with the retail store and other details; added new secondary sources. General clean-up editing and corrections such as the proper Lollipop Shoppe record format in that early anecdote.
Need images of some Norton releases and the store. 128.253.187.8 (talk) 16:00, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Updates and editing
Talk:Bicycling & the Law

message: Please do not delete. The page is incomplete; it is currently being created. It will be linked to the topics "bicycle" and "bicycle law," along with approximately 4-5 other pages in this category. Blue Order 02:37, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem. I suspected that was the case, but after over 15 minutes passed without anything other than some category lists and citations, I went ahead and nominated it. Sorry. I'll be a bit more careful in the future. --YbborTalk 02:46, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sonic Adventure: Songs With Attitude Vocal Mini-Album

message: This is just the old Open your Heart Article with a track list on it  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.161.143.168 (talk) 19:23, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What the?

message: The Transmutor Vs. Razed In Black Remix of Open Your Heart does NOT say Sonic Boom in it.
What the heck was that guy smoking when he wrote this article?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mamaluigibob (talk • contribs) 00:08, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sonic Boom remix? 

message: This topic doesn't appear to have significant coverage in multiple reliable, independent sources (?) so I suggest merging it into its parent article, Sonic Adventure. Any objections? If I don't hear anything, I'll boldly redirect (nothing cited to merge) in a few days. czar ♔ 04:29, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Boldly redirecting now czar ♔ 02:44, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Henrique Medina

message: Can someone edit the following line under the References section in the article to show the language as Portuguese?
This article was initially translated from the Wikipedia article Henrique Medina, specifically from this version.
Yes, I can figure out from the Wiki link that the linked article is in a language named pt, which is probably Portuguese. Possibly the template needs to be reconfigured to show the orginal language.--TGC55 (talk) 13:53, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Portuguese article reference?
Talk:James Liston

message: Two editors have asserted that Liston attended Vatican II. Liston did not attend the Council. He was certainly in office all through the Council period (he did not resign until 1970). But he did not attend because of age and infirmity. See Liston's biography; Nicholas Reid, James Michael Liston: A Life, Victoria University Press, Wellington, 2006, pp. 266-267.Rick570 (talk) 23:44, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: James Michael Liston did not attend the second Vatican council

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://teara.govt.nz/en/biographies/4l11. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Money emoji💵Talk💸Help out at CCI!  21:59, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Cormack Foundation

message: "established for the purpose of raising funds " The source doesn't make this statement.  Should it be reworded to something more neutral?  Shot info 02:36, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello Shot Info. Added reference which says "It exists to raise funds...". Let me know if you require more references for verification, and I will add them if necessary. Cheers, --Lester2 05:25, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Better, but there is a little bit of OR occuring to link the two sentences together.  Nevertheless, will let it stand as it is minor in the context of the overall article.  Thanks.  Shot info 00:21, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: RS?
Talk:Godfrey de Lucy

message: Richard Pore was Bishop of Salisbury
de Lucy's successor at Winchester in 1205 was Peter des Roches
80.168.146.172 (talk) 22:47, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Richard Poore was first elected as Bishop of Winchester, but the election was not confirmed. Then he was elected Bishop of Durham, but again the election wasn't confirmed. THen he was sucessfully elected Bishop of Chichester, then transfered to Salisbury and finally transfered to Durham. The sucession of de Lucy was the unconfirmed election of Poore, THEN des Roches. In this, we're following Greenway's Fasti here. Ealdgyth - Talk 22:53, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  succession
Talk:Francisco Barreto

message: Borderline between A and B class, not that I care much. Someone else can rate it eventually. Picaroon (t) 02:59, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 