lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Somerset College

message: The reason that I have removed material from the page is that the material is nonnotabe, and promotes  or mentions student of no peticualr importance except that they are currently on some committe or project. as per policy that material is unencyclopedia and un important. some of the other removal was to ensure NPOV compliant. If you have any questions please leave a message on my talk page. Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 14:36, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  My recent removal of content 

message: This article requires urgent clean-up.  It containts large amounts of unencyclopedic content (prayer, captains of comittees ect) and uses honorifics throughout.Water3489 07:53, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requires Clean up

message: Changes to the Committes section have been made to more accurately reflect the committes present in the college and non existant committees removed. Watcher9 08:56, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Committees 

message: Somerset College entry reverted to old version due to vandalism Watcher9 02:45, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: Some more vandalism detected so will update this page. SomersetLT (talk) 06:01, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  More vandalism 

message: Request to be able to edit page as senior staff of the college.  SomersetLT (talk) 05:59, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: You're welcome to propose specific changes here. DMacks (talk) 07:08, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update request 

message: I made quite a major series of edits and for some reason it was reverted back to the old version. I was simply trying to get the most recent, accurate and detailed information possible that was available on the school's website onto this Wikipedia page. I even added a reference but it seems it has been deleted without a trace. 
Can we figure out a way of dealing with the issues with this article so it can be updated to the latest available information.  Adocrat (talk) 13:00, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:COPYVIO is an over-riding concern. Beware that what the school (or any subject of a WP article) feels is accurate and detailed might actually be WP:NPOV and/or WP:V problems. DMacks (talk) 19:03, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major edits due to outdated and newly available information 

message: Hello Editors,
I would like to make you aware that there is also a Somerset College Private School in Somerset West, South Africa. Please add to avoid confusion. Domain is http://somersetcollege.org/
regards from the Cape, --Claudia Owala (talk) 10:32, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Somerset College in South Africa
Talk:The Gathering (2003 film)

message: Would whomever felt the need to write the overlong plot sysnopsis consider paring it down to a a simple paragraph before others do it for you?  Usually when overly long plot synopses appear in an article, they get truncated in ways the original writer might not prefer.  I've seen the film myself and feel that it could be better represented here.  In fact, the critcal reaction was NOT that one-sided.  A better article could be written but I'm unfortunately otherwise engaged. LiPollis (talk) 09:59, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot Synopsis is FAR too long

message: The title says it’s a 2003 film, while the first line of the article and IMDB.com say it’s a 2002 film.  Maybe there’s a difference in the completed date vs. the date released, but whatever’s going on, it’s confusing. Minicarmen (talk) 03:19, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shouldn’t the title be 2002, not 2003?
Talk:The Ghoul (1933 film)

message: "Betty and her lover manage to escape."
Did the person who wrote that even see the film? The leading lady and man were the heirs (cousins) to the professor's estate and from two families who'd fallen out with each other. They weren't even on speaking terms prior to him going to see her after the professor's death.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.39.168.142 (talk) 01:15, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have deleted the link to the illicit hosting of this British film on Internet Archive. Co-writer Leonard Hines did not die until 1975, so UK copyright subsists until the end of 2045. As a non-US film still under copyright in its country of origin on 1 January 1996, it is protected in the US for 95 years after publication, so to the end of 2028. Nick Cooper (talk) 18:14, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright status
Talk:Grizzly (film)

message: This article is incomplete and is missing important information on the film's release and reception which needs to be added to the article. The article is also missing important citations for its information and some sections are unsourced or includes unsourced information. These sections need to be fixed with the unsourced information given proper citations or deleted. There is no information on the film's theatrical release and information on the film's reception (it was panned by critics and audiences), and these sections are completely absent from the article. This information needs to be added in their own sections with proper citations given to its information, the release section needs information on when it was released as well and the amount of money it grossed during its theatrical run (this will need to include weekly grossing as well as its total gross). All of these changes and additions need to occur in order for this article to meet Wikipiedia's guidelines and standards of a well developed and properly sourced article.--Paleface Jack (talk) 23:20, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup and Missing Information 

message: How is that possible? It says that the real bear shown in the movie was 11 feet tall, but no bear was ever recorded to reach that size. Should I put it down to 9 or 10 feet?Hypnobrai (talk) 14:12, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: 11 feet tall!?

message: I just looked on Severin Films' website and they're going to be re-releasing this film and Day of the Animals on Blu-ray on April 27. This news should be mentioned in both films' articles.Mcfoureyes (talk) 14:54, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: New home video release

message: I have OCD. Thylacine24 (talk) 04:33, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sorry about those undone and redone edits
Talk:Happy Birthday to Me (film)

message: This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB.
Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 20:04, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "needs-infobox" tag 

message: An IP editor has been blanking content that says it's an American co-production.  Here's what the sources I've found say:
* Variety: Canadian
* AllMovie: Canadian
* British Film Institute: Canadian
* American Film Institute: Canadian and American
Although AFI seems to disagree with the others, it seems to be in the minority.  Any other thoughts? NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 08:12, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Country 
Talk:Hell of the Living Dead

message: "In an attempt to give the film a more exotic feel and provide the protagonists with another set piece in which to battle zombies, Mattei suggested that footage from the 1972 film La Vallée be incorporated into the film and sets built to mirror the village from the documentary so new scenes could be shot". 
What documentary is this referring to? The way it reads it seems to be referring to La Vallée as a documentary, which it is not. I am going to edit this line. 95.45.113.179 (talk) 14:57, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  What documentary? 

message: I swapped the poster back to the original Italian theatrical poster. The earliest date the film was released was in 1980. Going by the Montly Film Bulletin review, the film was not released until a few years later in the UK, so swapping the current poster with the UK quad poster does not seem follow the infobox standards. Andrzejbanas (talk) 23:38, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Poster

message: I've removed the recent additions of excessive titles and edits. The various titles are plentiful, and hog up space in the lead, and the other citations added do not state at all what is being said in their respective citations Andrzejbanas (talk) 22:30, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Excessive titles and edits
Talk:The Hills Have Eyes 2

message: I deleted some of the plot, since it revealed to much of the movie. Goldfishsoldier 03:59, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The point of a plot section is to tell the plot (which in turn reveals things that happen in the film). I'm going to revert it back, but I'll add a spoiler warning. -Lindsey8417 12:01, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'm going to clean up the writing in the plot summary, but I don't have the movie in front of me to confirm any of the details. It'd be nice if someone who has it can make sure I didn't accidentally introduce any mistakes. Kutulu (talk) 01:29, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: No worries, I will go through it and check it out, I am pretty familliar with the movie.Millertime246 (talk) 01:46, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  too revealing
Talk:Hollywood Chainsaw Hookers

message: The UK video release was not allowed to have the word Chainsaw in the title, so the film was released simply as "Hollywood Hookers".
Is that true?! (i.e. source please?) Seems crazy to not be allowed to have the word chainsaw.... Mathmo 12:01, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 23:52, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: UK release
Talk:Ringworld (role-playing game)

message: I have change a link under the "Setting" section from "hominid" (meaning humans, some human ancestors, and great apes) to "humanoid" (meaning resembling humans, but not necessarily genetically related). The latter is more common in science fiction themes, but if someone more familiar with Ringworld knows that "hominid" is intended, please link to Hominidae, the correct article page. The "hominid" page is just a disambiguation page. Iggle 07:04, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Right or wrong, the term used in the books is hominid. Xihr 22:26, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good. Then I will link it to Hominidae so it's going to the article, not to a dab page.  Thanks. Iggle 07:04, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Hominid vs. hominoid

message: The Ed Gore that is linked to in the credits is not the correct Ed Gore  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.140.122.3 (talk) 22:26, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Credits links
Talk:Hwangpo-muk

message: Is this the same dish as norangmuk (노랑묵)? Badagnani (talk) 22:35, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Pure Korean. --Caspian blue (talk) 00:31, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Alternate name?

message: Finding a photo of that is like sighting a rare bird. Aren't there more at Flickr? Or maybe the photos we've found before were all at blogs and commercial sites. Badagnani (talk) 00:54, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If you're willing to email to copyright holders and take you time to explain CC-BY, CC-SA or other image tags, and then forward permission emails to OTRS for the final confirmation, I would let you know relevant image links. Well, I spent about one month to get images of memilmuk to be uploaded to Commons. I sent an email to photographer having hwangpomuk pictures one and half month ago, but got no answer.--Caspian blue (talk) 01:43, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

text: Nope, I received reject letters from copyright holders a lot, since they get to know Commons only accepts CC-BY, or CC-BY-SA and their photos should be allowed to re-use for any occasion such as commercial purposes. Anyway, if you want to add a better photo of this food, you have to spend your time for that.--Caspian blue (talk) 01:50, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo
Talk:Keaton (name)

message: This works, do not move or delete JayKeaton 07:51, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

message: The Keaton Chiu issue was handled wonderfully boys, good job ^ ^ JayKeaton 20:01, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Keaton Chiu

message: Just out of curiosity, what the hell is a "keaton goodel"? 81.198.149.173 (talk) 20:09, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: It will be my Feline death one day
Talk:Chief Justice of South Africa

message: An anonymous editor  203.25.230.27 made many constructive contributions to this and related articles, but in all cases included an Afrikaans translation of the name in the opening paragraph. Since South Africa has 11 official languages, Afrikaans should not be singled out in this way. I would welcome discussion on this, but each time I attempted to contact the anonymous editor, these attempts were ignored, and each time I removed the Afrikaans translation, it was reinstated. See my talk page for more details. Zaian 07:59, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Afrikaans translation
Talk:The Nutty Squirrels

message: I'm holding Go Bird Watching in my hand and the only date is on the front cover, which says "®1959-GOODFORD". I'm taking this to mean the trademark registration date on the artist name & concept, rather than anything particular to the album, but AMG dates this album to 1959. Other non-authoritative sources put this album at 1961, and I'm going with my best guess, which is probably a bad idea. I'm not breaking the shrink wrap -- don't even ask.
Some of this information (including URLs) I hope to move into individual album entries. edgarde 08:00, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discography dates and omissions 

message: FYI. Ikip (talk) 21:51, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shirley, Squirrely and Melvin: LIVE]]

message: A Google search turns up nothing on this album except for copies of the article. Does it really exist? Tymime (talk) 01:09, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hey Shirley! The Album 

message: Why does Shirley and Squirrely redirect to this page?  They're not the same group (neither Don Elliott nor Alexander "Sascha" Burland were connected to them in any way, especially since one of the singers in S&S is female), and they should have their own page. --Wrassedragon (talk) 19:56, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shirley and Squirrely? 

message: John Hughes' The Nutty Squirrels 148.252.133.215 (talk) 13:55, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Nutty Squirrels About Film
Talk:Paweł Włodkowic

message: In the article's final paragraph, what is a "paroch"?  What language is that taken from?  logologist|Talk 08:00, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Parish. 'Parochial' is a cognate word (an adjective). 2003:E6:747:2144:A014:FEE0:44C6:CC22 (talk) 15:13, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: "Paroch"

message: Per common English name:
* 81 results for "Paulus Vladimiri" + council (to filter non-English results)  
* 15 results for "Paweł Włodkowic" + council (to filter non-English results)  (and of those at least 5 in Polish)
Renata (talk) 06:16, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename
Talk:National Assembly of South Africa

message: An anonymous editor  203.25.230.27 made many constructive contributions to this and related articles, but in all cases included an Afrikaans translation of the name in the opening paragraph. Since South Africa has 11 official languages, Afrikaans should not be singled out in this way. I would welcome discussion on this, but each time I attempted to contact the anonymous editor, these attempts were ignored, and each time I removed the Afrikaans translation, it was reinstated. See my talk page for more details. Zaian 08:04, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: i'm not the user 203.. but i added the afrikaans translation for the national assembly here. its one of the official languages. in the article about the belgian parliament also both, the dutch and the french names are mentioned. if someones wants to add the names in languages like isiZulu, he is free to do so. --Severino 16:28, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm with Zaian here: If we put in the names in all 11 official languages, the first sentence would be a paragraph unto itself, and quite unreadable. I'm taking it out, but if you feel strongly about it, maybe a table of all 11 names, elswhere in the article, would be a good idea. -Kieran 20:39, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Afrikaans translation

message: Just a note to say that I have removed some [or an] image[s] from the page beacuse they were speediable under either:
*Category:Images with no fair use rationale
*Category:Images with no copyright tag
*Category:Images with no source
Or similar category. Iolakana|(talk) 16:02, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed deleted image(s)

message: SA's national assembly is chosen through proportional representation, and is not a mixed member institution. There are not two types of MPs.
Psylocybha (talk) 03:01, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mixed member? 

message: Why are parties under the multiparty charter written as the opposition and other opposition parties are written as other? 105.1.162.2 (talk) 22:30, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parties
Talk:VIA Envy

message: "A total of 5 controllers exist in the Envy range. Ironically, since the demise of the SoundStorm audio solution, the VIA Envy has become an option as a replacement part for integrated audio on nVidia motherboards, along with cheaper Realtek offerings."
Why is that ironic? -- Sy / (talk) 08:05, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Market Street Bridge (Chattanooga)

message: If the official name is the Chief John Ross Bridge, then why is the article at "Market Street Bridge"? What is the article called in Chattanooga media? Mike H. That's hot 08:07, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :I disagree that it should be moved.  Wikipedia:Naming conventions (common names) states that the most common name should be used, not necessarily the official name.   Cacophony 03:05, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I also disagree with the move, due to Wikipedia Naming conventions. VerruckteDan 03:55, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not moved. —Nightstallion (?) 07:08, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  requested move 
Talk:KnowledgeWare

message: I agree with the suggested merge. Reyk YO! 08:21, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?

message: The action against Tarkenton et al is a minor footnote in the history of Knowledgeware. Has this action been concluded? In any case, I don't personally think the history of companies should be written purely in terms of the flaws of their executives. Knowledgeware employed some great people and produced some great products. SEC action against Tarkenton (together with its eventual outcome) should probably belong on the Tarkenton page rather than the Knowledgeware page. --RichardVeryard 10:05, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  SEC litigation
Talk:Minsk (motorcycle)

message: I think it's worth noting the Minsk that Richard Hammond used for the Top Gear Vietnam Special, because there are probably quite a lot of people among Top Gear's vast viewership who won't have heard of the Minsk before watching that episode and would come here because of it.  A mainstream 'claim to fame.'  That may be a stretch, though.  Anyone agree?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.72.132.12 (talk) 01:50, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  the Minsk in Top Gear Vietnam
Talk:Skywarn

message: The article Cuyahoga County Skywarn was recently proposed for deletion through the WP:PROD process.  It is somewhat of an orphan.  Rather than loosing the content, I'd like to start a section in this article called "Skywarn organizations" to contain a list and contact information for various orgs around the country. --StuffOfInterest 22:38, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge from Cuyahoga County Skywarn

message: What is the proper spelling, Skywarn or SKYWARN? Both are currently used in the article. --Mortense (talk) 19:14, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It's "SKYWARN" in all-caps: http://www.nws.noaa.gov/skywarn . I'll make a quick sweep through the article & change whatever spelling needs to be changed. I used to work for the NWS... Guy1890 (talk) 21:41, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling/case 
Talk:Amir Cheema

message: I think this needs wikifying, de-POV-ing, and a couple of jargon terms explaining. Also the provenance of the links needs checking. Pseudomonas 08:41, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've now more-or-less rewritten this from scratch, I don't think it needs cleanup, though obviously it does need expansion. Pseudomonas 09:23, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:STAR (interbank network)

message: :"The network is directly descended from the former Cash Station, HONOR, MAC and MOST interbank networks, when they merged to form STAR in the early 2000s....."
I remember STAR as far back as the late 1980s, before they acquired these other companies.
This article implies that STAR didn't exist before these networks merged.
--angrykeyboarder 08:58, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I must have misread the STAR history (or the billboards).  I remember in 2001 having seen along PA 65 the big billboards indicating that MAC became STAR.  --Akira123323 02:48, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: This Article is Inaccurate
Talk:Amherst, New York

message: Hey guys, I'm the WikiProject Cities assessor of this article; if you need advice on how to improve it, just come and give me a holler! --Starstriker7(Say hior see my works) 05:37, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why does the article say that "the town of Amherst encompasses most of the village of Williamsville"?  As has been mentioned by other commenters, Williamsville is completely part of the town.  (Unless the author is getting confused-- fairly common-- between the village of Williamsville and the Williamsville postal zone.  14221 and the political entity of Williamsville are not the same!)  I think this should be corrected to drop the 'most'.  How about: "... the town of Amherst encompasses the village of Williamsville and the hamlets of..."  or maybe even something like: "... the town of Amherst encompasses the village of Williamsville (incorporated) and the hamlets of Eggertsville, Getzville, Snyder, Swormville and East Amherst (unincorporated)". Jkgree (talk) 18:35, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Williamsville 
Talk:Denisse López

message: I changed a link to the Worlds to "1991 World Artistic Gymnastics Championships". I could make it look like "1991 World Gymnastics Championships", but I think, it should be distinguished from the rhythmic gymnastics Worlds, which were held in the same year. If I was wrong, then feel free to change it. Cmapm 08:52, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Main course

message: The Main course is fifth in the order of the courses in the Formal Menu. The order of the courses in the Formal Menu is as follows:
Hors D'oeuvres,zchcjxc 
Soup,
Entree,
Main Course,
Dessert,and
Cheese.
 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.68.200.148 (talk • contribs) 04:01, 6 May 2006
:Numbers of courses can vary substantially. In terms of how many meals are eaten, the vast majority will be two or three. 128.232.228.174 (talk) 17:10, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Jochen Klepper

message: Here is the original December 10, 1942 entry from his diary (published as "Unter dem Schatten deiner Flügel"): "Nachmittags die Verhandlung auf dem Sicherheitsdienst. Wir sterben nun - ach, auch das steht bei Gott - Wir gehen heute nacht gemeinsam in den Tod. Über uns steht in diesen letzten Stunden das Bild des Segnenden Christus, der um uns ringt. In dessen Anblick endet unser Leben." Certainly worth a more accurate translation than what is currently in the article, or what I could do...
Is the information that he was a NSDAP member verified? 84.154.90.55 08:56, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled