Talk:Oracle Financial Services Software

message: Looks like good progress is being made in cleaning the article. I am removing the POV tag. Lets keep up the good work. Rigmahroll 17:41, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removing POV tag

message: I contest the proposed deletion of this article. Major reasons being that this is a well-known company in India listed on both the NSE and BSE. It has huge revenues. Google news returns media coverage by independent media. Also, the takeover of i-flex by Oracle was a notable event. Thus, this article meets notability criteria. The article could do with some cleanup, but that is not a valid reason to prod. If you still want to nominate this article for deletion, you can throw it open for discussion by sending it to AfD. Follow these steps to start the discussion. - Aksi_great (talk) 06:47, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good debate. I'm for editing then. One, thing - should the product awards be removed? Magazines (and even ones owned by Pearson-FT) award thousands of these things every year, sometimes on the basis of advertisement buying? I'd also suggest that the seperate Flexcube article smacks of advertising and that this page should be merged with I-flex. Cheers --Saganaki- 12:33, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Go ahead and clean-up the article. WP:CORP#Criteria_for_products_and_services will help you decide whether Flexcube deserves an article on its own or not. - Aksi_great (talk) 14:22, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

text: OK, based on WP:CORP#Recommendations for products and services, I suggest that the Flexcube page to be merged into iFlex ("Information on products and services should generally be included in the article on the company itself, unless the company is so large that this would make the article unwieldy"). Any thoughts? --Saganaki- 14:37, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I too think that the Flexcube article can be merged with iflex page. -- Rajith Mohan (Talk to me...) :-) 14:56, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prod removed 

message: I am very impressed with the way this article is taking shape. Great work by the editors involved with this article. Keep it up! - Aksi_great (talk) 17:55, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, sorry this is off-topic, but another user has put me on to the fact that BEA Systems could do with some work. It has a lot of separate product pages eg AquaLogic that should be merged with the main article same as we did here.  I'm putting this here as I think BEA plays in the same space as i-flex so people here would know the topic. It's more work than I can handle at the moment though as I'm getting another article peer reviewed. Cheers--Saganaki- 06:46, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good job! 

message: I see that, since some revisions ago, the number of employees has grown from 7000 to 7500 and 8000, all done anonimously. Is it a company insider trying to pollute this article again with advertising, or is this due to a real increase in the number of hired people? --Cantalamessa 16:13, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It does not possess an office in Hyderabad. The article is updated now. -- Rajith Mohan (Talk to me..) 07:37, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  No. of employees 

message: Is there anyone different from company employees who follows and checks if this article is becoming again a sort of advertisement? --Cantalamessa 09:29, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing and advertisisng 

message: The superfluous adjective and adverbs and similar terms are unsupportable, and have been removed. However, there are a number of claims are are unsupportable (comprehensive, most etc) which cannot be used and others which need references if they are to stay in the article. --Duncan 14:20, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs systematic edit to justify claims 

message: the article is about Oracle financial services but it looks like it is a failed attempt to give limelight to "i-flex" linking its name majorly with Oracle, wordings of the article have strong language and notions which clearly states that this article has been diverted from the topic and information is not at all correct, on further investigation on the topic, no such information can be found on internet as claimed in this article majorly promoting "i-flex".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Science.Warrior (talk • contribs) 19:51, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is  MISLEADING 

message: Substituted at 01:55, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Oracle Financial Services Software. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120103114638/http://mphasis.com/pdfs/FortuneRanking.pdf to http://www.mphasis.com/pdfs/FortuneRanking.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:39, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello Wikipedians,
Citation needs to get added in the first paragraph beside the word "2006" in the Oracle Corporation section.
Here is the citation link to get added as citation in the sentence "Oracle purchased Citigroup's 41% stake in i-flex Solutions for US$593 million in August 2005, a further 7.52% in March and April 2006, and 3.2% in an open-market purchase in mid-April 2006"
Link : https://academic-accelerator.com/encyclopedia/oracle-financial-services-software
Please take out some time to check and consider my suggestion related to addition of citation. Prudent CAS (talk) 10:35, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: No; that site merely mirrors Wikipedia and that page is taken directly from Wikipedia; it absolutely cannot be used as a source for Wikipedia or for verification. See Wikipedia:Mirrors and forks. NebY (talk) 14:12, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: This newly created account is endeavouring to contribute by adding citations. A request has been made to include relevant citations in the appropriate talk pages. Could you please offer guidance on the recommended links for updating citations on the Wikipedia platform? Prudent CAS (talk) 04:59, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I've responded on your talk page. NebY (talk) 11:06, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition Of Citation