lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of governors of Newfoundland and Labrador

message: Shouldn't this be List of Governors of Newfoundland and Labrador, given the timeframe and varying titles?  L-G is Canada/provincehood-specific and is the shortest/fewest part of the list.Skookum1 (talk) 01:16, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It might be necessary, under the circumstances, to split this list so that pre-1949 governors of colonial Newfoundland are represented on a separate list from post-1949 LGs of Newfoundland-as-a-Canadian-province. I submit that as a possibility, but not a requirement :-) Bearcat (talk) 01:47, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

text: Interesting question. I believe that I support this move suggestion (with a redirect from here, obviously). It is a list of governors of Newfoundland and Labrador; just that the most recent are lieutenant governors but still governors. DoubleBlue (Talk) 02:18, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'm rather concerned about the consistency of titles among related articles — there really does need to be a predictable, consistent, same-across-the-board title format of some kind, so that it's immediately apparent to our readers where any list of provincial (lieutenant-)governors is located. Bearcat (talk) 21:42, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Obviously there could be a redirect at the expected title but I do understand what you're saying. Perhaps the best solution is to have an article at List of Lieutenant Governors of Newfoundland and Labrador on the post-1949 Lt.Govs with a link to a more general article on all the governors of Newfoundland. Speaking of which, would it be more accurate to have that article at List of Governors of Newfoundland? I believe the name change is rather recent and pre-Confederation, Labrador was a kind of dependency; though my knowledge of Newfoundland and Labrador history is surprisingly weak. DoubleBlue (Talk) 22:11, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's the same issue we have with Quebec, PEI, Nova Scotia and New Brunswick.  I'm not convinced article splitting is the solution, and maintaining consistency among the 10 provinces leads me to think that the status quo is the best solution.  A clear explanation in the lead paragraph might be all that is required.  However, if that's not satisfactory, any change(s) we do make should be across the board.  --Skeezix1000 (talk) 21:01, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Name/move
Talk:Volos

message: This section is in a really bad shape.What does it mean "Volos has a huge amount of technical knowledge"?Energon 18:32, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This BBC report may be of interest: "Greek town develops bartering system without euro" Vernon White . . . Talk  14:32, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Economy

message: We got some originated sources about Volos.Try to help too  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.167.45.80 (talk) 00:43, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  - 

message: ...comes directly from the slavic god Veles (god), the protector of shepherds or Vlachs.89.205.2.29 (talk) 22:05, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: name Volos

message: Is a city in greece 2A02:C7E:2E0F:D100:79E7:6BB1:6465:5DD2 (talk) 07:09, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Volos
Talk:Digital Photography Review

message: Come on now - the article states this is one of the top 1000 websites, and the article was referenced from 5 other Wikipedia articles already before it was created. For reference, slashdot.org is a top 500 website, and nobody would dream about deleting that. Thue | talk 22:57, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy deletion request

message: At the time of writing, I think it's still justifiable to call DPReview a top-1,500 site. However, the trend over the last six months is slightly but noticeably downwards, so this will need watching. I'd better emphasise that I still think it's a significant website, and would remain so even at 2,000. Loganberry (Talk) 17:39, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alexa ranking 

message: Although I agree in principle, I think the words "sold out and sold its soul" are inapropriate in a Wikipedia article. They express an opinion rather than objective information.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.82.25.164 (talk) 20:55, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inappropriate content. 

message: especially "Main Site Features" is bad. 77.12.90.93 (talk) 02:50, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advert
Talk:The Impatient Alchemist

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Moneytrees🌴Talk🌲Help out at CCI!  00:32, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:Policraticus

message: There are actually many justifications of tyrannicide that predate that of John's.  Cicero's, in the wake of Julius Caesar's assassination, is probably the most famous:  
"What more atrocious crime can there be than to kill a fellow-man, and especially an intimate friend? But if anyone kills a tyrant — be he never so intimate a friend — he has not laden his soul with guilt, has he? The Roman People, at all events, are not of that opinion; for of all glorious deeds they hold such a one to be the most noble."  (Cicero, De Officiis, Book III, 19-20) Terrasirradient 23:01, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks a lot -- I changed it to "after antiquity," which I think gets more into the "Middle Ages" part of it.--Idols of Mud 16:13, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Alfred (village), New York

message: I don't understand why the wikipedia page for Alfred has to advertise for the Bicycle Man.
Why don't we advertise for the Jet, the Sub Shop, and Tinkertown Hardware then? Because it's not appropriate.
Raidfibre 23:02, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree - and it wasn't even located in Alfred village.  It's gone.  -- Alucard (Dr.) | Talk 13:24, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have been in an email discussion with the owner of this site over the past few days and feel that the discussion needs to be more out in the open and documented.  For privacy reasons I will not disclose the contents of the emails.
The owner has added his site to the EL section of this article several times and I have removed it.  I felt that the tagline on the site, saying "Alfred NY Area Businesses Have a "Great Deal In Store" for You!", plus a look around the site,  indicates that the site's primary goal is to promote local commercial businesses, something that is not allowed as per WP:EL, unless it is the official site of the entity the WP page is about. I therefore feel that it fails the following requirements in "Links normally to be avoided":
* Links mainly intended to promote a website.
* Links to sites that primarily exist to sell products or services. 
I have suggested that the owner follow the recommendation to open up a discussion here (in order to avoid potential WP:COI issues, but he has not had the chance to yet so I thought I would "facilitate" this here, rather than continue an email exchange which will go undocumented.
So the question is - is this site appropriate for the EL section of this article?
And related issues, I have also recently removed http://www.alfredny.info and http://www.alfredny.org from the page, because I feel that they do not add significantly to the article.
I would appreciate other opinions on this from established WP editors. I am more than happy to be corrected. Thanks. -- Alucard (Dr.) | Talk 13:37, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  AlfredNY.Biz 
Talk:Dornier Do J Wal

message: Specifications in table do not match those in the main text. Classical geographer 07:30, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: After reading my reference and compairing it to this, I'd have to suggest another attempt be made. I'll add it to one of my To-Do lists. --Colputt 20:25, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Shouldn't the name of this article be "Dornier J Wal ? [my emphasis]. After all, the word "Wal" appears throughout. 
What do other editors think ? RASAM (talk) 14:37, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: The name
Talk:Dornier Do 11

message: I have assigned this article Stub-class assessment in spite of its length and six uses of its only citation (overused but it's something) because of its small size and poor in-line citation as well as a lack of abundant citation. –Vami_IV✠ 10:16, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Being a Stub or not is solely based on article length per WP:Stub.  The number of references is unrelated. --Finlayson (talk) 20:11, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub-class assessment
Talk:Meoto Iwa

message: I think I translated the concept onto a specific pair. Unclear how to divide themImmanuelle 💗 (please tag me) 15:44, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Division between specific couple of rocks and general rocks 

message: I propose splitting this article up into Meoto Iwa (Ise) and Meoto Iwa Rocks. The first will be about the pair at  in  in Ise Bay. The second will be about the type of Iwakura. Immanuelle 💗 (please tag me) 07:48, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Here's my revision of this with the content removed https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Meoto_Iwa&oldid=1121127109 and here's my draft for the trimmed version Draft:Married_Couple_Rocks Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (talk to the cutest Wikipedian) 17:11, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split proposal 

message: There is a separate article for the Japanese and Chinese language versions of this article. https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%A4%AB%E5%A9%A6%E5%B2%A9  The articles should be merged so that all the languages appear under the language drop down menu. 2601:8C:C000:6110:889:5FB2:DCAF:1301 (talk) 05:26, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article is split across languages
Talk:Nathaniel Russell House

message: I took out the nonsense about the spiral stairs not touching the walls and not having any nails.  That is just made-up nonsense.  I have been a volunteer guide at the house many times, and that is just totally false.  The stairs definitely attach to the walls as they ascend between floors.  Moreover, not only are their nails in the stairs, the stairs have been reinforced with steel supports.  This is just an example of tourism urban myths.  The staircase is fantastic and a real feat of engineering, but it is not an unheard of miracle.  There are other examples of cantilevered stairs in Charleston.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by ProfReader (talk • contribs) 04:32, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of Spider-Man (1994 TV series) episodes

message: I just came across this page through one of the episode pages as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikify. This page is absoloutely fine - doesn't need touching. But as I checked out more and more of the episode pages linked to they just get bigger and bigger - to the point that for what they are describing they are monstrously huge and detailed to the point of possibly infringing the copyright of the original cartoons. I don't know what the optimum length is - but if somebody else has a better idea please edit away Madmedea 23:14, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The episode pages are still a mess from what I've seen. Long plots with almost all the information from the show. They need mass condensing. It should be a summary: not a massive detail by detail guide to a 20 minute cartoon. RobJ1981 06:34, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean up and the episode page

message: There should be a section or space that talks about differences from the original comic book storylines. Only some of the more prominent examples need to be mentioned. I would be happy to contribute them with references.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.110.11.45 (talk) 20:15, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Differences

message: As seen in the earlier revision of the article, episode production order for Season 1 is different from the broadcast order. Some episodes originally aired out of order, creating continuity errors. This information should be added back to the article.
This website contains production codes and detailed information about the production of each episode, but I don't know if it counts as a reputable source for Wikipedia.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.0.61.114 (talk) 15:08, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode order
Talk:Deputy Secretary-General of the United Nations

message: Did a similar position exist prior to 1997, and what was it called? -- Deborahjay (talk) 09:17, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pre-1997? 
Talk:Shizuoka Sengen Shrine

message: The location on the map is way off. Shizuoka Sengen Shrine is in Shizuoka City near Sunpu Castle. The current marker is somewhere around Numazu. It's nowhere near the Izu Peninsula.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 126.54.118.73 (talk) 12:22, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
Talk:Suwa Shrine (Nagasaki)

message: There is an excellent book on Shinto rituals which reveals a lot about Suwa Shrine--John K. Nelson's A Year in the Life of a Shinto Shrine. I'm currently busy with schoolwork, but if nobody has expanded this by then, I will be happy to. Wixteria 02:45, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Suwa-taisha

message: Or is it somewhere else?--JaredMithrandir (talk) 15:54, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Is the Sacred Tree on the Mountain? 

message: The article title should match the lead. Unless the shrine is commonly referred to in English as "Suwa taisha", it should probably be moved to Suwa Grand Shrine, which is stated in the lead as the primary name. V2Blast (talk) 05:09, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title/lead 
Talk:Stellar drift

message: Should proper motion and radial velocity be combined into this article? No chance for it to be deleted then, and more importantly the topics seem to belong together. Xiner (talk, email) 00:19, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not really.—RJH (talk) 23:50, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Combine pages?
Talk:Todd Manning and Blair Cramer

message: *I am currently working on improving all of the soap couple articles on Wikipedia. While I, of course, understand the fact that articles on Wikipedia shouldn't only provide plot summaries, all of these soap opera couple articles will be worked on and formatted to fit Wikipedia policy, which is why Wikipedia: WikiProject Soap Operas exists, and is why I ask other editors to hold off on nominating these soap opera couple articles for deletion. To go around and delete these soap opera popular and or supercouple articles is not the answer. Clean-up is. I will get around to fixing up this article, in which will be soon. Flyer22 22:41, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I finally got around to bettering this article. It isn't my best work, considering that I didn't have a lot of real-world context to work with regarding this one, but this article is better now. Flyer22 (talk) 15:51, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, an advantage of this article is that it contains Todd and Blair's history without having the redundancy of all of that in both of their individual articles. Flyer22 (talk) 01:40, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Fitzwilly

message: The name 'Abercrombie & Fitch' and its former corporate logo figure prominently in this film; at one point when men wearing coveralls bearing the logo appear to remove household furnishings, they are explained to the mistress of the house as being "Accomodators & Footmen", removing the items for use at the upcoming "Accomodators & Footmen's Ball.  2600:1004:B104:D6F:3957:C9E5:82AA:1849 (talk) 04:38, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abercrombie & Fitch
Talk:Daitoku-ji

message: I was surprised to read this line in the article:
"In 1582, Toyotomi Hideyoshi buried his predecessor, Oda Nobunaga, at Daitoku-ji."
I thought Nobunaga's body was never found after the Honno-ji burned to the ground. Boneyard90 (talk) 14:36, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nobunaga's grave 
Talk:Cold Turkey (1971 film)

message: I think it's important to leave in the reference to Hiram C. Grayson's (Edward Everett Horton) fart in the limousine, as it is most likely the first time that flatulence is depicted in a modern American film, contrary to widespread popular belief that the first depiction was in Blazing Saddles, which was released 3 years later. Bill S. (talk) 01:07, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  First fart depiction in U.S. movie 
Talk:Types of membership of Opus Dei

message: Someone wrote the line, "When, however, someone leaves the prelature unlawfully (i.e. without the permission of the Prelate) he or she commits mortal sin.[citation needed]" 
I have decided to delete the word "mortal" because there is no citation here that proves "mortal" belongs there. Furthermore, it depends entirely on the intention of a sinner whether something is 'mortal' or not. Section 1855 of the Catechism of the Catholic Church says, "Mortal sin destroys charity in the heart of man by a grave violation of God's law; it turns man away from God, who is his ultimate end and his beatitude, by preferring an inferior good to him."Catholic Church. (2000). Catechism of the Catholic Church (2nd ed.). Our Sunday Visitor. No. 1855, "Mortal Sin" This definition and the sections surrounding it don't give examples of venial or mortal sins because only God knows whether a sin was mortal. 
I'm not even sure that it is considered "sinful" to leave Opus Dei without permission, but when not even the worst crimes (including crimes against humanity) are necessarily mortal sins, the victimless "sin" of leaving a religious order shouldn't be characterized as "mortal sin". The line annoys me because, while all Catholic religious orders discourage leaving without permission, I'm not sure that it's always sinful. If someone is sure, please correct it and if possible give a citation. Himkdm (talk) 07:31, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Sin or Mortal Sin, or Not?
Talk:Rüppell's warbler

message: Rüppell is the correct name of the German naturalist, but this contains a "ü", which is not a letter in the English language.  Is the English name "Rueppell's Warbler"?  This spelling gets a lot of hits on Google. Snowman 23:34, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Checked 16 ornithological textbooks, and every single one uses Rüppell's, none Rueppell's. The argument about "ü not being used in English" is spurious in respect of names, and the argument about keyboards lacking the ü is nonsensical (none do). I've moved the page back to its correct orthography. - MPF 13:56, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  English name 

message: Lead and infobox differed, so I've standardised on ruppelli, following IOC 6.3 (though I note that IOC are inconsistent for other species with the same epithet, e.g. Rüppell's Vulture is Gyps rueppelli, and IUCN use rueppelli). Dave.Dunford (talk) 18:57, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Scientific name
Talk:2002–03 WHL season

message: The 2003 bantam draft section at the bottom of this article strikes me as something that should be in the 2003-04 WHL season article, or better yet, should be its own article.  Right now, 2003 WHL Bantam Draft redirects here.  If I find the time to do so, I'll move the list to that page and expand it.  If anyone else wants to beat me to it (it's worth a shot), the full list of draftees can be found here.  Orlandkurtenbach (talk) 09:54, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 2003 Bantam Draft
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/FT2 2

message: User:FT2
      run at Fri Jan 12 23:38:45 2007 GMT
Category talk:	5
Category:	21
Help:	1
Image talk:	5
Image:	41
Mainspace	7851
MediaWiki talk:	1
Talk:	2459
Template talk:	50
Template:	114
User talk:	741
User:	1643
Wikipedia talk:	586
Wikipedia:	1925
avg edits per article	8.18
earliest	08:23, 11 July 2004
number of unique articles	1889
total	15443
2004/7 	127 	
2004/8 	40 	
2004/9 	6 	
2004/10 	22 	
2004/11 	1331 	
2004/12 	879 	
2005/1 	302 	
2005/2 	136 	
2005/3 	160 	
2005/4 	120 	
2005/5 	16 	
2005/6 	5 	
2005/7 	1 	
2005/8 	103 	
2005/9 	124 	
2005/10 	1513 	
2005/11 	1974 	
2005/12 	814 	
2006/1 	22 	
2006/2 	303 	
2006/3 	657 	
2006/4 	509 	
2006/5 	1139 	
2006/6 	2290 	
2006/7 	637 	
2006/8 	161 	
2006/9 	43 	
2006/10 	43 	
2006/11 	192 	
2006/12 	924 	
2007/1 	850 	
FT2's editcount summary stats as of 23:36, January 12th 2007, using Interiot's wannabe Kate's tool. (aeropagitica) 23:40, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Loseley Park

message: Great work on expanding this article SuzanneKn!! Paul75 23:51, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sir More's room contain an 18th century Vauxhall mirror.  Sir [  ] More's room.  "Sir More" is an impossibility, though it appears in the official Loseley website.--Wetman (talk) 05:09, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Article

message: This section is a cut-and-paste from the official website, needs to be rewritten at the very least Murgatroyd49 (talk) 16:00, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The garden 

message: Is it worth mentioning that in the late 1950s the former cabaret performer Phyllis Dixey worked there as cook, as referenced in her Wikipedia page?
It's part of the house's history and sometimes it's interesting to mention staff as well as owners, especially when one was a celebrity of her day with a biography and a biopic of her life. 41.254.43.59 (talk) 13:37, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Famous staff
Talk:Social trinitarianism

message: The article is about a system, a monotheistic trinitarian relational model, called "social trinitarianism" in contemporary philosophical and religious works, e.g. "Trinity" entry in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, "The Trinity" entry in Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Twentieth-Century Philosophy of Religion (v. 5, p. 295), The Routledge Handbook of Contemporary Philosophy of Religion (p. 152), The Cambridge Companion to Christian Philosophical Theology (p. 13), Oxford Readings in Philosophical Theology (v. 1, p. 30), etc. Google Ngram also shows "social trinitarianism" came into use in the late 20th century while "social trinity" peaked circa 1900 but is also much in contemporary use.
I think the -ism has more MOS:PRECISION because it conveys that it is a model of a system, like, for example "Latin trinitarianism," another model. –BoBoMisiu (talk) 20:50, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I endorse this move and will move it myself if no one objects.--Jahaza (talk) 21:33, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  Agreed and moved. Caorongjin (talk) 18:51, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to Social trinitarianism 

message: I recall (from my days at the Harvard Divinity School that an idea described as 'relational theology' had its rationale in 'social trinitarianism' that was not dogmatic, but allegorical, and that I had then felt that their 'relational' exegesis had its precursors in a number of other earlier movements in theology but had become a vehicle for clinical counseling students (many of them nuns doing counseling and other ministries). MaynardClark (talk) 07:03, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relational theology 

message: I am a theology student and went to this entry to get an overview of this concept. I am no clearer on the concept than before. 65.92.152.196 (talk) 21:02, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is not clearly explained