lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Der Stürmer

message: The paper is described as anti-Catholic, but theme is not developed in the article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dynzmoar (talk • contribs) 20:08, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anti-Catholicism 

message: I've undone a spate of IP edits because Cshnei had pointed out at the Teahouse a disturbing pro-Nazi bent. After an extremely delayed reaction, I decided to see who had added the edits and when. To my surprise, an IP had added it and a bunch of suspect rewording relatively recently (in the beginning of November 2019). I couldn't gauge the accuracy of subsequent content edits, especially since they also cited no sources whatsoever, so I just reverted it all. I have added some infobox edits back in.
I'm noting this for two reasons: a) to give anyone reviewing my reversion more context and b) to start a paper trail in case this becomes a pattern, in which case we have good reason to request WP:SEMI-protection. Rotideypoc41352 (talk) 04:32, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  December 2019
Talk:Walther Wenck

message: I believe that tendentious writing like the one I just removed has no place in this encyclopedia, especially not when it is factually incorrect, like the remarks about certain death faced by the refugees. ESTO ES MENTIRA AMIGOS LOS GANADORES ESCRIBEN LA HISTORIA
"When asked by a maniacal Hitler to come to the aid of the Nazi high command holed up in Berlin during the last days of the war, he instead determined to use the remnants of his army to provide humanitarian relief to the thousands of refugees being bombed by the Russians. He told his army, "boys, we have to go in for one last mission." Estimates vary, but it is most likely the corridor his forces opened enabled 250,000 refugees to escape certain death at the hands of the out-for-revenge Russians."
Regards Andreas 10:39, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I normally do this to help readers distinguish between German and opposing armies, since it very easily gets confusing. I believe the meaning is still clear, even to non-German speakers. Andreas 16:10, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  maniacal Hitler 

message: Changed from "Their task was to save people from the fighting...." to "Their task was to save people from Red Army atrocities." Boz 02:04, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meaningful change 

message: Article contains 2 copyright images, 1 of which uses FairUse tag. This is not possible. 
*Walther Wenk.jpg listed as NoRightsReserved (supposedly) unattributed 
*Guderian Wenck color 002.jpg by Frentz
The 2nd image is likely edited and a montage from photo taken by Frentz in June 1944 eg.series. As Frentz it is copyright Ullstein Bild Deutschland. No valid FairUse rationale exists for this image. I do not believe it qualifies for a FairUse rationale because Walther Wenk.jpg‎ is included under a (possibly wrong) NoRightsReserved tag. Use of copyrighted images to illustrate an object (Wenck) when an image which is free or has a more favorable copyright status already exists is not permitted under FairUse.
All WW2 images from nazi regime are copyright and PD/"copyright unknown" status is not acceptable. 99.9% of color images from Hitler regime are Frentz. Legal action against wikipedia over copyrighted Frentz images has been threatened before resulting in all problem images being removed from wikipedia.
Unless a suitable rationale, tag etc arises I will begin to list the Frentz image for deletion. 
:See Also: Talk:Heinz Guderian#Suspected FairUse rationale Violations
82.29.229.116 16:19, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Suspected FairUse rationale Violation

message: I shifted the focus of this paragraph to the person of Wenck, mentioning his car accident (see Operation Solstice for the details). I removed the summary of the actual operation - it can be easily retrieved by clicking the link, and it obscured the focus on Wenck. 90.229.34.175 (talk) 09:32, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Operation Solstice
Talk:Treaty of Hudaybiyya

message: :Most scholars agree that alcohol was prohibited in the same year as Hudaybiyyah (628 CE). First, Muslims were told they should not come to prayer while intoxicated (4:43). When 'Umar prayed for clearer guidance, the Prophet recieved verses 5:90-91, saying that alcohol was an abomination and Satan's handiwork. 
--Striver 03:38, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: trivia

message: This article should be merged with Treaty of Hudaybiyyah or vice-versa.Timothy Usher 00:29, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's the funniest forking I have ever seen. Pecher Talk 21:06, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge these articles
Talk:Book of the Law of the Lord

message: No discussion or NPOV observable. Removing catagorization. PhatJew 10:51, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This article could use a note expressing who considers the Botlotl canonical (the strangites) and a little less POV in the intro.  I'm not too interested in this subject (and I don't imagine it gets a large amount of traffic) but still, some of the wording concerns me. Beyond that, nice work! gdavies 21:05, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV and some missing information
Talk:Wheel of time

message: Because Geir Smith might wish to rewrite the contents of this page in an acceptable form and move them to the article on Kalachakra, I'm currently refraining from deleting the contents of this article. Therefore I'm creating a subpage and moving this content there, which Geir Smith can use as a source for adding content to the Kalachakra article. The Wheel of time article is now being returned to a stub form that is more appropriate.
An accessible summary of the Kalachakra concept may be added here at Wheel of time, but it should be very brief and mention the main concept of Kalachakra in summary style, without going into details about bans and conflicts and definitely without talking about other WP articles being censored! This article is currently a detailed treatment (though rather illegible to non-specialists) of Kalachakra, and the proper Kalachakra article (and subsequently Wikipedia) may greatly benefit from Geir Smith's contributions. Please understand that everything has its proper place. The subpage is /Oldcontent. Loom91 07:36, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Page 

message: With most of the material from this artcile mvoed to Kalachakra and the remaining looking OK the taskforce entry has been closed.  If you disagree about the article being in good shape please let me know and it can be reopened. RJFJR 15:09, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup taskforce entry closed

message: First, thx to the Cleanup Taskforce.
But, now I wonder is there anything of value left in this article that couldn't profitably be merged into Kalachakra and perhaps a redirect left here?
or a dab pointing to Kalachakra and the Robert Jordan books?
Zero sharp 20:10, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Post-Cleanup Question
Talk:Luo Han Guo

message: I have started translation of the German version of this article, de:Luo Han Guo to add to this one, and will be adding the new info as I translate it .   ACH 11:18, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

message: This plant was already covered under its species name, Siraitia grosvenorii.  The version here looks good, though.  Proposal:  merge this text into Siraitia grosvenorii.  Badagnani 06:11, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Greasby

message: I started this Greasby entry and my intial entry has been usefully modified a few times (thanks for the hairdresser) . I think that much more content would be good! 
Map of Greasby
Photos of Greasby more links...etc
Maybe even more humour
:I've added the standard map template, as used on other pages. You can modify the coordinates and scale if you would like to show a slightly different view Shrew 16:06, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

message: Member of National Team and world class footballer from Greasby is not listed.
20 questions with Niamh Charles | England Football at englandfootball.com March 1, 2022. 87.74.143.243 (talk) 22:25, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Niamh Charles
Talk:Vehicle registration plate identifiers of the United Kingdom

message: I can't find any reference to the older system which would be useful since many cars on the road are still bearing those types of registration —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.205.224.154 (talk • contribs) 
:I have found a site with information about the previous system. Alan Pascoe 11:15, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If it's only SN07 which has caused potential offence, leading to TN07 plates being issued, then why are TF07 and TK07 plates being seen - on the sort of vehicles unlikely to have personalised marks, e.g. local authority vans?  81.153.220.34 13:40, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

message: There haven't been any objections to this proposal, and as the other article duplicates essentially all the information in this one, I have changed this page to a redirect to the relevant section. Letdorf (talk) 09:52, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Vehicle registration plates of the United Kingdom]]
Talk:Treo 700w

message: Does anybody know if the Treo devices can be used with Pay as You Go cell phone service in the USA? Specifically Verizon Inpulse (CDMA), since that is what I use, but I would be interested if they can be used with other pay as you go as well.71.116.71.27 07:44, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  can Treo be used with Pay As You Go? 

message: I removed this line and replaced it with "as an alternative for users who need to use Microsoft software". Palm has repeatedly (particularly in emails to developers) said that the Treo 700w is targeted at business users who need to the ability to sync with Exchange etc. 
Personally, I doubt the Treo 700w is meant to be a definite successor to the Treo 650 anyway. There are Treo 700p's in the wild if you look around. --Mcbridematt 11:43, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "..as a successor to the Treo 650"
Talk:Diagonal system of control

message: This so badly needs a diagram! — sjorford (talk) 11:44, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right! (adds to to-do list) — TheKMantalk 07:34, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Diagram

message: I propose that this page be merged with Diagonal (football). Both articles cover the same topic, and each one contains information that the other doesn't. I would also suggest that the two articles be merged to this location (Diagonal system of control) as it more accurately describes the topic. Comments please. - PeeJay 14:16, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Invocr 13:42, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Stig Bergling

message: I just edited this page to add new info on Bergling's political affiliation, and new last name. My source (Dagens Nyheter) is linked at the bottom, but I was unsure of how to make it a footnote. Would be happy if someone could edit that. --192.229.17.103 06:13, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Arcade and Attica Railroad

message: I have an image of #18, the Arcade & Attica's steam locomotive. But Wikipedia won't let me put it on.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kstephent (talk • contribs) 17:14, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Does it need a totally separate page for each engine?
I had copied all data from the No.18 page and integrated it with the main page. If this is unacceptable, what about a page for roster information on all units of the road, instead of one page for each unit?  - J.D. Gallaway - FCCorp.US (talk) 22:47, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Locomotive Roster
Talk:Suba language

message: Hi!
It looks like you have a good start here. I mainly fixed grammatical issues, just to make sure that antecedents and information are clear. The biggest thing is just expanding your article! It seems like you have a good set of sources, so definitely try to expand the information from those into your article! When typing information, make sure that the sentences are complete as well. Katherinemoretti (talk) 15:30, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer review
Talk:District of burghs

message: I find references to two parliamentary burghs called Buckhaven and Methil and Innerleven, created 1918. In List of burghs in Scotland#Fife I find a reference to a police burgh called Buckhaven and Methil, created 1891. Perhaps by 1918 there was no sense of a need for the names of parliamentary burghs to correspond with the names of burghs for other purposes. Or is there some other explanation? Laurel Bush 12:12, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Buckhaven, Methil and Innerleven 

message: I am wondering what system of counties is used in the article. Various parliamentary burghs were not created until after boundaries were changed under the Local Government (Scotland) Act 1889. Laurel Bush 12:19, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  County boundaries 

message: Queensferry and South Queensferry seem to be slightly different names for the same burgh, not two  different burghs. Also, I dont think the burgh was ever in Fife. Midlothian/Edinburghshire perhaps. Laurel Bush 12:25, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Queensferry and South Queensferry 

message: There were Districts of Boroughs outside Scotland, Carnarvon Boroughs, Denbigh Boroughs, and Swansea District of Boroughs to my certain knowledge. DuncanHill (talk) 23:09, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outside Scotland
Talk:Oz Fox

message: Ok, it seems this was deleted due to vandalism, but... couldn't it have been reverted? Just wondering. Thief12 12:14, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Cervical plexus

message: Spinal nerve, ventral and dorsal roots, and ventral and dorsal rami (sing. ramus) all have well-established and widely accepted definitions.  Erroneous use only causes confusion.  Ventrl roots carry mainly motor fibres (and some sensory fibres, and autonomic fibres at certain levels).  Dorsal roots carry sensory fibres.  Union of each pair of ventral and dorsal roots forms a spinal nerve.  Shortly after the union the spinal nerve divides to form a dorsal ramus (which supplies the skin and muscles of the back of the neck and trunk), and a ventral ramus (which supply the other body parts).  Cervical plexus is formed from ventral rami, not ventral roots.  Therefore it does not give rise to the greater occipital nerve, which arises from C2 dorsal ramus. - 14 February 2006 137.189.4.1
: Thank you for your suggestion! When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make whatever changes you feel are needed.  Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the  link at the top. You don't even need to log in! (Although there are some reasons why you might like to…) The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills.  New contributors are always welcome. --Arcadian 13:11, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Spinal
Talk:Generalized polygon

message: When discussing the values for n, one should be able to say something about the number of classes of nontrivial ngons for n=6 and 8 (hexagons and octagons).  Does anyone know more? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Evilbu (talk • contribs) 12:20, 14 February 2006  (UTC)
I know more, what would you want to know or have me write down?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.49.82.63 (talk) 15:59, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Values for n
Talk:2006 Victorian state election

message: Where can one find Victorian state 2PPs to two decimal places? The 2006 election is the only one lacking a two-decimal 2PP. Timeshift (talk) 00:51, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Apart from calculating it, I'm not sure. I'll have a look in some of the libraries. Frickeg (talk) 00:58, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I found it in a VEC publication, thanks anyway. Timeshift (talk) 00:46, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  2PP to two decimal places? 

message: Yesterday I was reading about people's long-running concerns with this page. From my point of view when I re-read the article, a lot of it was reflective on the 2002 election rather than talking about the 2006 election. I did 5 minutes worth of chops and moves and shuffles, and whilst it's no means anywhere near perfect, it's in my opinion a lot better than it was. So, what are the current/new major concerns for people regarding this article? The biggest one by far for me at the moment is the outdated results tables being used. Timeshift (talk) 23:27, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need for improvement
Talk:Kamen Rider Kuuga

message: I don't know what your opinion is, should we put this on Film Stub rather than Anime/Manga Stubs? I know there are kamen rider mangas but Kamen Rider Kuuga is not Anime/Manga, AFAIK. Should we put another stub (maybe create Tokusatsu stub?) Draconins 12:45, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hey, thanks for noticing that!  is what I've been using.--Sean Black (talk) 18:49, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this Anime/Manga ?

message: Shouldn't it be "Kamen Rider Kūga"? There's no evidence it's been licensed, and a URL is a pretty weak "transliteration into English". わwaらraうu Smile! 06:58, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uh, why is it Kamen Rider Kuuga? 

message: I highly recommend that the Grongi section should have its own article, like how the Lords, Orphnoch, Undead, etc. have their own since they contain so much information. So really, I'd like the enormous list of Grongi to have an article on their own. Would anyone agree with this? --Burai (talk) 19:48, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This should definitely happen soon.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 21:29, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks very much, Ryulong. --Burai (talk) 22:24, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grongi section 

message: I noticed that some of the other Heisei Kamen Rider seasons have episode lists - particularly Kiva, Faiz/555, and Decade. Could someone perhaps find/add a list for Kuuga? 12.75.84.61 (talk) 01:53, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode list
Talk:Horses of Saint Mark

message: It says they are now in a museum. Which?--SidiLemine 09:30, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Museum

message: Was there ever another figure being pulled by the horses? Arthurian Legend (talk) 19:21, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The so called Horses of Saint Mark originally had a chariot with them when they were displayed at the Hippodrome of Constantinople until the Fourth Crusade - whether or not there was a figure on the chariot is something I don't know. It would be interesting to find out what happened to the chariot, though. --Kurt Leyman (talk) 14:19, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was there another figure associated with the quadriga? 

message: According to the article, the horses are referred as "Roman" (Roman art refers to the visual arts made in Ancient Rome). There is absolutely no fact to support that claim, just speculation about who might have ordered the construction of the horses, but this certainly does not qualify as a fact that the horses are Roman. In the best case, the history of the horses is unknown. So, in my opinion, the word "Roman" is misleading on the entry sentence of the article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.48.71.237 (talk) 13:54, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roman Horses? 

message: I've removed the unreferenced attribution to Lysippos. It can be restored when a reference is provided, but since (a) there is a tendency among some art historians to try to associate surviving works of ancient art with the names of famous sculptors, and (b) it is highly unlikely that most surviving works of ancient art were actually made by the few artists whose names we know from literary sources, this statement shouldn't be left in the body of the article to mislead readers. When and if it is reintroduced, it should be made clear that the attribution is merely speculation without any evidence to support it. Choliamb (talk) 14:32, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lysippos
Talk:Rebecca Dussault

message: This is an article about a Winter Olympian and a link is present from the United States at the 2006 Winter Olympics which was obsolete till I created this page, it may be short of information but is no where close to "meeting criteria for deletion". GuardianOfTruth
:Well then, if it should be the consensus that WP should serve as a bulletin board for sports results ... I mean, at this time, the subject of the article is just a participant in the games, not even an Olympionike. And leading an active catholic lifestyle certainly does not cure non-notability. But if someone wants to take it to AFD, that's fine with me. --DrTorstenHenning 14:55, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of hospitals in the United Kingdom

message: These all appear to be (at a glance) the big hospitals; what about Cottage Hospitals, are they suitable for inclusion? --Blowdart 13:04, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your comment. I was wondering about including [Day Hospitals] but some are actually part of a larger hospital. Samantha of Cardyke 15:32, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Not a day hospital, but the Royal Berkshire is, to my knowledge, the Royal Berkshire and Battle Hosptials, where Battle counts as a hospital on its own. Then there's Henley's Townlands Hosptial, a convelesant/cottage hospital
Perhaps someone could look at the Welsh [Other] hospitals and make sure they are allocated their town name (unless it's in the title). I am an expert on Scotland not Wales.  Thanks. Samantha of Cardyke 15:32, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

message: It would be better to list all Scottish hospitals by health board area. Hospital services are not provided per council area. Astrotrain 18:25, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Scotland

message: I'd like to explore whether there is scope to make this a more effective list.  I'd like to see a table rather than a very lengthy list that could perhaps include some basic information rather than just a list of links.  Perhaps a table could have headers along the lines of Name, Trust, Status, Beds, Specialism.  Possibly this could be a set of tables by region so London, Scotland, Wales etc.  The content box itself is extremely large at the moment and I think it would make the page more readable if the content was structured slightly differently.  I'm thinking a table the like of which exists at List of multiplayer browser games. MLA 10:11, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There seems to be quite a lot of overlap between this list and the :Category:NHS hospitals - what are the relative advantages of list v category? — Rod talk 17:50, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As it stands, I don't think there is much value in this list over the category but see :Category:Lists_of_hospitals to see what's happening on wikipedia in regard to articles like this.  A more fully populated list such as the one I propose would have additional value in my opinion. MLA 08:31, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The list's future

message: I propose splitting this list into 4 separate lists. --sonicKAI 13:42, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split The List