Talk:Battle of the Bulge (1965 film)

message: It would be interesting to find out how much this movie cost, particularly in the context of A Bridge Too Far and The Longest Day. Oliver9184 (talk) 17:11, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Budget

message: During a frantic retreat scene, Telly Savalas appeals for fuel for his tank from a passing truck which is laden with barrels of it, and one is thrown towards him onto the ground followed by an African American soldier from the back of the truck to assist him with it. Salavas makes some complaining comment about the fuel etc, and is promptly punched down onto the muddy ground by the silent African American soldier who is presumably already annoyed at the retreat from the Germans.
===German Vehicles===
Upon seeing this film; it appeared to me that the "King Tigers" were in fact M60 Pattons and the Halftracks were M4s? Anyone else agree? Perhaps it should go in the article? 86.160.223.188 (talk) 15:29, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I visited the museum at El Goloso late last year and the M47 Patton on display was used in the film. The image I added to the article is mine. JonCatalán (talk) 22:21, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "No African Americans appear in the movie" - one actually is in it but doesn't speak 

message: Upon seeing this film; it appeared to me that the "King Tigers" were in fact M60 Pattons and the Halftracks were M4s? Anyone else agree? Perhaps it should go in the article? 86.160.223.188 (talk) 15:29, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I visited the museum at El Goloso late last year and the M47 Patton on display was used in the film. The image I added to the article is mine. JonCatalán (talk) 22:21, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: German Vehicles

message: :Image:Bulge sheet A.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 04:43, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Bulge sheet A.jpg

message: I watched this on TV several years ago and noticed that nearly all the early scenes with the Germans in US uniforms in the bunker were cut making the later scenes involving them confusing.  Has anything reliable commented on these TV cuts and why they were done?--BruceGrubb (talk) 14:59, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The cutting of the Germans in US uniforms on TV 

message: This is an epic-length movie with a somewhat convoluted plot. The details included in the description serve a useful purpose and are all important. Consequently, I removed the "Plot too long" tag. Roesser (talk) 21:24, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "Plot too long tag" 

message: I removed claim that M24s were employed in extremely large numbers at time of the battle of the Bulge, edit some time ago by an anonymous editor, without edit summary.
See Steven J. Zaloga's M24 Chaffee Light Tank 1943-1985 (Osprey, Oxford, 2003) pp. 10-11 - first batch of 20 M24s was on the way to units in ETO in early December 1944, from which number only two (2) were diverted to 740th Armored Bn. which deployed them since Dec 20 in the Ardennes area. (The other eighteen went to 744th Armored Bn, which employed them in Operation Grenade in February 1945 - when the battle of the Bulge was over - for the first time.) That's what I'd call 'extremely limited' rather than 'extremely large' numbers - in fact M24 was in substantial numbers deployed only after the fighting in the ETO was largely over. Sorry, I should had explained this in more detail in the edit summary previously.--78.80.180.156 (talk) 09:45, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  You can add allegations about the Malmedy incident to "inaccuracies". --41.151.90.211 (talk) 21:18, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Inacuraccy" removed 

message: These are on the Blu-Ray but I have never seen before in the DVD and VHS releases. They change the nature of the Hessler character.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.232.12.71 (talk) 20:39, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: No, there is no extra footage in the film on the Blu-Ray release.  They used the original theatrical release, just as the 2005 DVD did.  Sorry, WRONG. HammerFilmFan (talk) 18:52, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added a couple scenes 

message: The synopsis/article should include a reference to the song Panzerlied. 
http://www.worldwar2movietimeline.com/movies/battle-of-the-bulge/
71.80.203.226 (talk) 23:56, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Panzerlied 

message: I heard that the film's runtime in the United Kingdom was apparently, originally 212 minutes (3 hours and 32 minutes) according to IMDb: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0058947/alternateversions?ref_=tttrv_ql_5
It's likely clear that they might've chopped down shorter to 170 minutes (2 hours and 50 minutes) after the roadshow version in the UK, while it released in a US with a same short runtime, which I'm not 100% sure. Stephenfisher2001 (talk) 04:23, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  United Kingdom's original runtime