Talk:Las Bocas

message: The background information I used was found at [History section], just noticed that the reference link used on that article, Enciclopedia de los Municipios de México Estado de Puebla does not actually contains any of the cited information. A more accurate site is probably History section. The article about Puebla perhaps needs some work. I will use the correct link.--Raúl Gutiérrez (talk) 17:27, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Just checking in. I am keeping an eye on the progress. Also remeber that the strength of the wiki platform is that an article can include links to relevant background information instead of including it all within the article here. This means that only the material that is directly relevant to the topic should go in the article while reader can be directed to useful background information throiugh the use of wikilinks.·Maunus·ƛ· 18:20, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Also I would very much encourage you to not rely only on sources that can be found online. The best sources about topics relating to ancient Mesoamerica are not online, but either in Peereviewed journals or in published monographs (e.g. archaeological field reports) or in books published by academic presses. I know that editing from Mexico it can often be difficult to find good paper sources about historical topics and one ends up relying on guidebooks or websites. One vauable resource is JSTOR and similar online repositories of research articles - I have access to most of those so if you need a source that is in one of the online databases that you can't acces, I can help you with that. ·Maunus·ƛ· 18:31, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It makes sense, INAH uses their sites more to talk about what they do or dont, than to share investigations results and data. I would love to get those resources, except that I would have to know what is in them, perhaps I need to tell you what new articles I am working on and if you have time, see if you find good information on them. Appreciate the help. On Las Bocas, I am working with Thelmadatter with the text. Before it is uploaded, I will post a note on your talk page. Thank you.--Raúl Gutiérrez (talk) 18:51, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I know that Christopher Pool's "Olmec Archaeology and Early Mesoamerica"  Spends some pages discussing Las Bocas. That might be worth checking out if you have a chance. There's also some info here ·Maunus·ƛ· 18:54, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Very interesting, tried buying one or the other, but are not available in Mexico, also must buy hardcovers and delivery is uncertain, apparently electronic versions are not available.--Raúl Gutiérrez (talk) 19:41, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewriting process

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Las Bocas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20030511201854/http://www.famsi.org/reports/99041/section15.htm to http://www.famsi.org/reports/99041/section15.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:42, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified