Talk:Dummy load

message: This article had templates indicating it should cite its sources and that it needed technical cleanup. I have rewritten it to provide citations for most of the information, a and I think the remaining information is obvious to anyone who is familiar with radio transmitters. If someone can find supporting citations, that would be great, but the sources I have take quite a bit for granted. I also think the first paragraph now makes it clear that this topic is for people interested in technical information related to radio transmitters. Gerry Ashton 20:06, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

message: With all due respect, I posted an image next to the Audio section displaying a product that is relevant to the subject. The image was twice removed by Binksternet. After I reverted it back, I stated: (Please state reason for a revert so changes can be made appropriately.) my reply was: (Image is promotional). Please could Binksternet answer my initial question by giving me a bit more info as to why the image is promotional? What elements of the image are promotional so that the image can be changed? Why have the other images on the page (which are also certainly in the "promotional" catagory from Binksternet's point of view) not been reverted!? The image and post are purely informative. Please explain your reasons in more detail. Best Regards.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ali66b (talk • contribs) 15:20, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: One sometimes sees an account created and sees that all the edits by the new editor promote a particular company or product. One naturally suspects there may be a conflict of interest. The edits by Ali66b fit the pattern in the sense that all the edits promote the HotBox, but on the other hand, the conflict-of-interest editors usually plaster their hype on every article that is even remotely related. Ali66b's edits do not fit the pattern in that sense, because his/her edits have been limited to this article. Jc3s5h (talk) 15:31, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Jc3s5h, I see both your point's of view. The content I have posted is no better/worse than the other posts on the page so I personally think that the picture should be allowed. I am an audio engineer truly interested in new audio technologies and thought that this might be a good starting point for a wiki, I know my "credentials" as a wiki writer is non-existant, but an editor has to start somewhere! I do plan to write more in the area of audio and DSP technologies in the near future.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ali66b (talk • contribs) 16:05, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image of Programmable Dummy Load 

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 17:30, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Telonic-Kikusui-PLZ-U-Series.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion