Talk:Aristoxenus

message: This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 03:46, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating

message: Is the long critique of Plato relevant for this page? It was added by User:Roaryk on the 26 May 2008. He/she added a similar critique of Plato's metaphysics to Simplicius of Cilicia on the the same day () but I removed it shortly afterwards, because it was of no value on a page devoted to Simplicius (whose surviving writings run to thousands of pages devoted to all sorts of subjects). Admittedly, far less survives of Aristoxenus' works, but I still can't help thinking a discussion of Plato belongs on a page about Plato. Singinglemon (talk) 21:31, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Compare the discussion here.  There is a lot to say about Elementa harmonica, and this incidental light on Plato's lecture On the Good is a relatively insignificant part of it.  It would be more logical for the full quotation and discussion to occur in an article discussing On the Good, but the current encyclopedic treatment of that topic resides in the 87kb article Plato itself.  Of course if this got moved to Plato where it (currently, with no separate article) belongs, then maybe the folks editing the Plato article could have the job of figuring out how to break things up.  I would opine that quoting the passage in Greek in its entirety is utterly gratuitous.  (By the way, concerning the eventual treatment of Aristoxenus' theories, I note the existence of Musical_system_of_ancient_greece#Classification_of_Aristoxenos.)  Wareh (talk) 14:43, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, I've gone ahead and simply removed the Plato passage. This sort of thing seems to happen quote a lot on Wikipedia pages without any active editors - someone adds big and complex (and sometimes even with references), and it just gets left on the page, a kind of elephant in the room everyone tries to ignore. :) I've added a couple of paragraphs on the contents of the Elementa harmonica - it's been pulled out of a book dating from 1868, so if anyone wants to replace it with something more modern, they have my best wishes. I also add one bit from Musical system of ancient greece. Singinglemon (talk) 21:45, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Eccellentissimo! I've only just glanced over your work, but it looks like a very good start, indeed. It may take some time to comb through the details, but at least we have a broad outline to work from, at last. I freely confess to being one of those editors who has been steadfastly ignoring this "elephant in the room", waiting for some brave soul like yourself to take the first step. Thank you. I'll see what I can do to critique the content, working from Barker's translation (which I have on hand) and some other, more recent scholarship. Thanks for being up-front about the comparative antiquity of your (modern) source!—Jerome Kohl (talk) 23:55, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elementa harmonica 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Aristoxenus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721083538/http://www.toxolyros.gr/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=5663&Itemid=857 to http://www.toxolyros.gr/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=5663&Itemid=857
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:13, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified