Talk:Theodore Stephanides

message: What a source for birthday "21 January"? --Kaganer (talk) 00:59, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthday with no source? 

message: According to the text, it seems that Stephanides studied medicine in Paris only for one year, from 1929 to 1930.
Is this possible? If someone knows more about Stephanides' studies on medecine in Paris, please enlighten us. Irigozin (talk) 20:02, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stephanides' studies 

message: A fourth crustacean species was named after dr. Stephanides. It is Arctodiaptomus stephanidesi (Copepoda, Calanoida, Diaptomidae), described as Diaptomus stephanidesi by Otto Pesta in 1935.
See also: https://fauna-eu.org/cdm_dataportal/taxon/8efb7b17-3f3f-4a96-8f59-b47d792435d0
and: http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=362855  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.35.182.82 (talk) 20:13, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: *  Thanks. I see that you created an Ukrainian page for Arctodiaptomus stephanidesi, with two sources in the references. Maybe you could use that info in the Stephanides article and update/replace the references. Or I could do that myself, but later. Taurus Littrow (talk) 17:17, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

text: *:I'm looking for more sources. Still can't find them, maybe later.--Brunei (talk) 17:29, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arctodiaptomus stephanidesi 

message: Oops, I guess I shouldn't have started the reviewing process. Sorry, I never did this before. Taurus Littrow (talk) 19:06, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good article nomination 

message: , it's in a footnote (diacritics omitted): "Stephanides became a passionate astronomer until the end of his life... Researchers Ewen A. Whitaker and Danny Caes have confirmed (in email correspondence, Aug 2013), that Felix Chemla Lamech did propose the name 'Theodore Stephanides' for 'Romer A', a moon crater. (The I.A.U. did not accept the name.)". Ewen Whitaker lists "Stephanides" as being proposed by Lamech in Mapping and Naming the Moon (1999) p228 , but this does not indicate either when it was submitted. ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 08:31, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! Doesn't matter much, I guess. Taurus Littrow (talk) 08:38, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re moon crater 

message: - major WP:COPYVIO problems, in particular with this, but also elsewhere. As mentioned at your talkpage, please also be careful of close paraphrasing when fixing any copyvios. I found these after starting reviewing the lead, and won't review further before things are fixed - existing notes: 
* As the lead should contain no material that isn't part of the rest of the article, and the article is not controversial, citations can be moved to the body (MOS:LEADCITE)
* Cut "famous" (MOS:PUFF) - plus what percentage of people worldwide would readily recall Durrell (even with the recent TV series)? What about in ten years?
* Cut "which is still cited today" (MOS:DATED) - plus if it's the definitive work it can be assumed that it will be cited where relevant...
* Cut "noted" possibly rearranging that para a little.(MOS:OPED). Similarly, don't use "notably" (noting that this also has a WP specific meaning).
* I don't think that the generic "acclaimed" (MOS:PUFF) is supported by the evidence in the body.
(broadly, let the reader draw conclusions for themselves based on neutrally worded statements of fact, including statements of expert opinion given due weight). ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 03:07, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re review request 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources.  Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  MER-C 10:50, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed