Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history/Coordinators/August 2006

message: === KarlBunker ===
:We have been working on the crossbow article together and he knows to manage hot disputes. Wandalstouring 21:02, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nomination has not yet been accepted. 
; Comments and questions
*I thank Wandalstouring very much for suggesting me, but I don't want to accept a nomination at this time. I don't have enough time to spare for this project. Good luck to you! KarlBunker 21:42, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Third-party nominations not accepted 

message: :We have been working on the crossbow article together and he knows to manage hot disputes. Wandalstouring 21:02, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nomination has not yet been accepted. 
; Comments and questions
*I thank Wandalstouring very much for suggesting me, but I don't want to accept a nomination at this time. I don't have enough time to spare for this project. Good luck to you! KarlBunker 21:42, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[User:KarlBunker|KarlBunker]] 

message: === SSG Cornelius Seon (Ret) ===
: I'm not running for anything, primarily because I really do not have the time to shepherd this endeavor, and so let me say that I support the incumbents, at least for one more term. Running any sort of operation of this nature is practically a full time job, and I am glad to report that generally they have lived up to the expectations of their jobs, and have improved this project by leaps and bounds.
; Comments and Suggestions
# One thing that does need to be addressed is the fact that when someone posts incomplete information, or may format in a way not to the standards of this or that other person, there have been some who have spent a lot of time complaining about it, rather than using their own effort to complete or correct what ever is bothering them. I have followed the latter advice myself, and find that it satisfies everyone concerned. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CORNELIUSSEON (talk • contribs) 
(The above moved from the main page by Kirill Lokshin 18:13, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  General commentary 

message: : I'm not running for anything, primarily because I really do not have the time to shepherd this endeavor, and so let me say that I support the incumbents, at least for one more term. Running any sort of operation of this nature is practically a full time job, and I am glad to report that generally they have lived up to the expectations of their jobs, and have improved this project by leaps and bounds.
; Comments and Suggestions
# One thing that does need to be addressed is the fact that when someone posts incomplete information, or may format in a way not to the standards of this or that other person, there have been some who have spent a lot of time complaining about it, rather than using their own effort to complete or correct what ever is bothering them. I have followed the latter advice myself, and find that it satisfies everyone concerned. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CORNELIUSSEON (talk • contribs) 
(The above moved from the main page by Kirill Lokshin 18:13, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[User:CORNELIUSSEON|SSG Cornelius Seon (Ret)]] 

message: #As a newbie to the Military history project I don't know anyone well enough to make an informed decision - but I'm glad that there are a lot of people that do, and will be happy to work with the majority's choices. UrbanTerrorist 01:44, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: None of the Above

message: I'm assuming I'm not the only one with this question. Should we vote for ourselves, or will that automatically be figured in the final tally (assuming that if you accept the nomination/nominate yourself, you also want to vote for yourself)?--Nobunaga24 06:15, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it'll be automatically adjusted for (if it makes a difference, in any case). Kirill Lokshin 12:09, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  A question 

message: I know that strictly speaking it means nothing, but in the little tabulation of votes in the top right corner, it lists me with having nine even though I have only eight (including my own) below by statement.  A glitch?  --Harlsbottom 21:51, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's manually updated (by a couple of different people, to boot), so it's probably a typo. Please feel free to update it! :-) Kirill Lokshin 21:52, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vote Count