lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Mercuria similis

message: According to IUCN, Pseudamnicola melitensis Paladilhe, 1869 is a synonym of Mercuria similis (Draparnaud, 1805). GBIF agrees. Fauna Europaea and INPN list Amnicola melitensis Paladilhe, 1869 as a synonym of Mercuria similis (Draparnaud, 1805), possibly meaning the same. XenoVon (talk) 11:24, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Species' name
Talk:Vetterli rifle

message: The second picture on the right is either a M78 or M81 rifle, not a M71 stutzer. It has the single trigger from a rifle and 2 barrelbands from the M78 or M81 (older types had 3 bands).80.101.7.35 (talk) 19:47, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I changed the photo of a 71 Rifle fo a real Vetterli Carbine.  I deleted Pfenninger, he did never produce Vetterlis, he was a lokal gunsmith who prepared Vetterlis for shooters --hmaag (talk) 13:18, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vetterli Carbine
Talk:Oppas

message: Quoting from Reliable Sources:
:Tertiary sources such as compendia, encyclopedias, textbooks, and other summarizing sources may be used to give overviews or summaries, but should not be used in place of secondary sources for detailed discussion.
This means that your sources are not as good as the ones already cited and should not be used in place of them. This is why it is unacceptable to keep insisting that he was the bishop of Seville or that he used the title "don", for example, when the article already explains why it is believed by some that he held that see, but may have held another or none at all (and sources it to the secondary literature). Srnec (talk) 00:16, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sourcing issues
Talk:Blacksburg–Christiansburg metropolitan area

message: I lived in this MSA on and off for 10 years and I have never head it called the Tri-Cities. EVER. Not even in passing. I'm editing to the more correct "New River Valley." --RUGrad  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.4.107.154 (talk) 21:48, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Charlottesville, Virginia metropolitan area

message: the charlottesville page has no mention of the university of virginia.  is anyone that stupid?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.236.184.81 (talk) 16:31, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Kingsport–Bristol–Bristol metropolitan area

message: FYI: There is an ongoing discussion at WP:CFD regarding the names of categories for certain US metropolitan areas, including this one. See Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2013 March 4#Metropolitan areas in the United States. --Orlady (talk) 17:13, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: CFD for category related to this article
Talk:Roanoke metropolitan area

message: I'm new, but I noticed that the Roanoke metropolitan area and the Roanoke Region of Virginia are essentially the same. I'm suggesting merging the articles in one "Roanoke Region" article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Treefingers1206 (talk • contribs) 01:24, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Roanoke Region
Talk:Virginia statistical areas

message: Population data from the United States Census Bureau may be updated either:
:(1)  Every ten years with data from the decennial United States Census, or
:(2)  Annually with data from the decennial United States Census and annual population estimates from the United States Census Bureau.
The following table shows when population data is available:
United States Census Bureau Population Data
Source:         	Decennial Census                 	Population Estimates
Date:           	April 1 of years divisible by ten	July 1 of years not divisible by ten
Region:         	date population data available   	date population data available
nation          	December                         	December 1
state           	December                         	December 1
statistical area	February-March of next year      	April 1 of next year
county          	February-March of next year      	April 1 of next year
places          	February-March of next year      	June 1 of next year
Please contact me if you have any questions.  Yours aye,  Buaidh  22:16, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population updates
Talk:Asplenia

message: I suggest merging Congenital asplenia into the Asplenia article. Congenital is but one of many causes for asplenia, but the consequences are the same irrescpective if due to congenital absence, subsequent surgical splenectomy or auto-splenectomy due to infarction of the spleen due to conditions such as sickle cell disease. The asplenia article could perhaps have its lead-in split with a "Classification" section (see WP:MEDMOS guideline) for the causes (and this would also be a better place to put current mention of hyposplenia). David Ruben  Talk  17:05, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No comments for a week - merged and split lead-in as above David Ruben  Talk  00:28, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal

message: I would like to make one observation which might lead to a qualified person editing this article. Where the spleen is removed surgically, the surgeon will sometimes leave a bit of spleen in there, and in some subjects this can grow to become a functional or partially functional spleen over time. Such patients may be less likely to be at risk than those sindrome de down who a–re completely asplenic, and perhaps would not need long term prophylaxis. Sorry I have no references and no time to find them so... over to you..—Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.33.82.91 (talk • contribs) (18:11, 4 January 2008
:Thank you, yes a partial splenectomy will leave residual splenic function and so greatly (?totally) eliminate asplenic risks discussed. Of course there will a difference between planed proceedures in say hereditory spherocytosis treatement where a small amount of "healthy spleen" is left untouched and hence good postoperative splenic phagocytic function may be predicted, as against splenectomy after trauma where a small part of an otherwise damaged spleen is put back in place in teh hope that it may "take", but theer is less certainty for this. I'll seek out some sources (but non-surgical lay opinion is that in the latter case asplenia measure would probably at least need be instituted in the short-term until the auto-transplanted splenic section can become fully functional - but lets see what literature (or a surgeon/haematologist) might advise us) David Ruben  Talk  20:48, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestion

message: doi:10.1056/NEJMcp1314291 JFW | T@lk 13:27, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  NEJM review 

message: Review of vaccination guidelines doi:10.1111/bjh.13660 JFW | T@lk 15:35, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Br J Haem
Talk:Civaux Nuclear Power Plant

message: Why is the coord template used?  I know very little about these templates, nor do I care very much, but is there some kind of rule that's being invoked to use that? -Theanphibian (talk • contribs) 17:11, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello, I've seen that the Template:coord is more versatile and is proposed to replace many coor template. See also Template:coor. — M-le-mot-dit (d) 17:28, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: K, fine, I'll use that from now on.  I've put the coor title dms or the coor title d in a lot of articles though. -Theanphibian (talk • contribs) 17:45, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Coor(d) templates
Talk:Prick (magazine)

message: Can somebody please help me edit my addition correctly instead of deleting it?  This is suppossed to be an online encyclopedia of actual things.  I am trying to add a FACT, a real life published magazine, no different than any other magazine, and very similar to already added items such as Creative Loafing and LA weekly.  I just need help making sure it doesn't get deleted, I don't understand why it is.
I removed the speedy tag, because I didn't think this was a blatant advert. However, the article could do with a rewrite to make it more encyclopaedic, and there needs to be more reliable sources and indication of notability. --Darksun 19:22, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Podcast Awards

message: Are there any articles about the awards in Newspapers or Magazines?Kevin Crossman 17:16, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I have tried to add some references to reliable sources such as these. Anonymous101 (talk) 16:48, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Articles about the Podcast Awards from Newspapers, Magazines? 

message: There is also something like an European Podcast Award
Should it be mentioned here, does it deserve a page for itself?--Popopp (talk) 15:18, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other Podcast Awards 

message: The podcast awards are a scam to drive traffic to the website and get ad revenue. Le Douche? But of course! (talk) 19:39, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scam 

message: This article has more gramatical errors than a bad podcast.TheTribeHasSpoken (talk) 03:07, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Grammatical. User: Anon 14:59, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammer 

message: the criticism section seems quite unjust, and doesn't have any references.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.211.152.27 (talk) 13:36, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Criticism

message: There have been multiple instances of rule flip-flopping, public drama (ala Twitter), and clear bias on the part of Todd. To present this as an entirely professional institution as the article does is very disengenuous.
199.66.66.136 (talk) 18:01, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: If you have sourced reports, feel free to add such a section. It is common for awards articles. It looks like there used to be a criticism section once, before it was removed, disguised as an edit only adding 12th awards info here: Special:Diff/788459669. I will restore this section since it was sourced. Feel free to add to it (with sources) as you see fit. -2pou (talk) 03:59, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Why no controversy?
Talk:Love, Saskatchewan

message: The coordinates need the following fixes:
* Write here
Love, Saskatchewan is located at  53°29'9.44"N, 104°10'2.94"W ref google earth
the Wikipedia location shows Bulyea, SK
(Later...) Done. BrainMarble (talk) 03:03, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error 

message: The Village of Love, SK has a newer official web site than the one listed in the article. The old web site hasn't been updated for 15 years and is no longer in use. The official web site for Love, SK is administered by the Village Administration and the proper address is http://www.villageoflove.ca 
I hope that someone could update that, I don't know the rules and don't want to just go in and change it. It might be important to note that the old site appears to have been used as a significant source for the article, so it might be left on for citation purposes. 
Thank you, to whoever can help!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.11.85.164 (talk) 15:30, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Love, SK Official Web site 
Talk:Perry Moore

message: Practically every sentence in this article could be tagged with the  tag. Rather than do so, I've placed a citation tag at the top of the article. It should be relatively easy to provide citations, but they are not given. - Tim1965 18:10, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Inline citations missing
Talk:Mavis Nicholson

message: Lots of tributes to her on Twitter today, but no formal announcement or news story about her death. Her article seems to have been rewritten in the past tense, so assume it is just awaiting a reliable source for her death. Theheartof (talk) 08:00, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death 

message: The Broadcasting section mentions several TV programs -- Tea Break, Good Afternoon, After Noon, After Noon Plus, and Mavis on 4 -- but doesn't mention what channels the programmes aired on.
-- Marcus Rugman (talk) 16:50, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Channels for TV programmes ?
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Biography/New articles

message: I just finished a biography of Anna Cora Mowatt. Can I add her to the list of new biographies for August 2007? - Epousesquecido 17:45, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I decided to add August 2007, hope I didn't step on anyones toes. - Epousesquecido 17:56, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

message: Is anyone actually using this list of bios for anything, or is it just some editor's abandoned project?
Georgejdorner (talk) 14:38, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: , I didn't know that the list existed. I found it only a few minutes ago. I have created a number of biography articles, and I can provide a list if anyone is interested. Eddie Blick (talk) 01:21, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Anyone paying attention

message: The DYK nomination for C. A. Patrides needs to be reviewed. 
Thanks!  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 14:24, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Template:Did you know nominations/C. A. Patrides|DYK nomination for C. A. Patrides]] 

message: I would like to use this list but it hasn't updated since February 2013. What's up with that? -Lopifalko (talk) 09:09, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Out of date
Talk:Facial toning

message: Bell's palsy#Physiotherapy lists some sources about physiotherapy although it is unclear if those therapies can also be called facial toning (I did not read those sources yet).  —PaleoNeonate – 13:19, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bell’s palsy
Talk:UNGG reactor

message: What was the composition and max operating temp ?
Was it a zircaloy ? Rod57 (talk) 12:10, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  MgZr alloy 

message: Marcoule G1 was only 2MW and never had a grid connection - which is probably why it's not mentioned in French activities on gas cooled reactors. Rod57 (talk) 12:36, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: G1 was military for plutonium production as I recall.  G2 and G3 may have been dual-purpose, as were the first Magnox. We should probably track cites down and add to the article. I don't have time for a few days at least. Rwendland (talk) 13:05, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marcoule G1
Talk:Ruby (Guardians of Ga'Hoole)

message: I personally believe that Ruby was supposed to be a Northern Pgmy owl. All information that says otherwise, I believe was a mistake on either the author's or the publisher's part.
        Information supporting my theory:
            1. Ruby, as everyone knows, is a red-like color. Short-Eared owls are not even remotely red, therfore would not be named after a shade of it. Northern Pygmy owls are very commonly red.
            2. If you look at Ruby's picture in the back of Book 5:The Shatering, it is that of a Northern Pgmy Owl.
            3. Ruby is described as a "shooting fire-ball" when colliering. As I stated in #1, Northern Pygmy Owls, not Short-eared owls, are commonly red and could be described as a fire-ball.
            4. In the River of Wind,Soren sees a streak of red and thinks "Ruby? Ruby and Twilight?"
She's a short-eared owl. At the back of the cover of The Shattering, that was a mistake. Primrose is a pygmy owl, Ruby is a short-eared owl. There are numerous references to Primrose being the pygmy and Ruby the short-eared, far more than vice versa. Dora Nichov 13:40, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What Type of owl is Ruby?
Talk:Radiodiscus iheringi

message: Different sources provide different information on the binomial authority for this species.  The IUCN lists Smith, 1881.  Fonseca and Thome 1994 list (Ancey 1899), after moving Stephanoda iheringi into the genus (I think, my Spanish sucks).  Given the commonality of the species name (due presumably to the adoration of Hermann von Ihering--I know of seven other mollusc species with the species name iheringi in other genera, as well as two rodents), I suspect these are two different species which had the same species name, which happened to be (re)classified into the same genus.  However if anyone has better information, it may help clarify the issue. 
I've requested Smith 1881 and Ancey 1899 from the library (at least the pubs I think they indicate), but I am not sure what it will find.  WoRMS seems to not have either species. If these are two separate species, we should probably move this to Radiodiscus iheringi Smith, 1881, and make this a DAB page. --TeaDrinker (talk) 05:19, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: To update, I was able to pull Ancey 1899 (The Nautilus 13(1):17-19) and he does describe a new species, named S. iheringi from Brazil.  I pulled the obvious guess for Smith 1881 (Proc. Zoo. Soc. London. 1881), but could not find a reference.  Unfortunately, I only had a few minutes to search the latter, so maybe I missed it (it isn't listed as R. iheringi, but I wasn't able to check every mollusc described to see if it might have been in another genus). It records the findings of the HMS Alert, which visited South America (although mostly further south than this species would be expected).  It is possible that the species is in another reference as well, but that seems like the obvious choice for new molluscs recorded in that year.  Next chance I get I will make copies and put them on Wikisource, since they are all now in the public domain.  --TeaDrinker (talk) 20:55, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for noticing this. I have corrected the authority to Ancey. (There is wrong authority written in the 2011 IUCN Red List.) There was also wrong synonymization made by Fonseca and Thomé (they probably did not respected the Principle of Priority). --Snek01 (talk) 23:54, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Binomial authority
Talk:St. Charles Municipal Building

message: Doncram, Thank you for your help, input, and good advice. I will focus my research on this subject into the design and architecture for improvement of the article. The building's design seems to fit the criteria of Deco more than Moderne. The architect referred to it as Deco. The nomination form may have misattributed and overemphasized Streamline Moderne being an influence to the architect.VerVynck (talk) 02:01, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Deco vs Moderne
Template talk:Rounded

message: In IE7 (Vista) the top border is missing now, probably because of the overflow:hidden. Freestyle 18:16, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The whole border? I just fixed a small error that fixed it in IE6. Still tweaking though, cause now there is a 1px line missing at the bottom (first div below the text is 1 px too low).  — Edokter • Talk •  21:59, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: IE7
Talk:Eighteenmile Island

message: Is there any word on why it is considered to be in Oregon instead of Washington, despite it being closer to the Washington border? --Android Mouse 01:57, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, looks like I misread the article. I had thought this sentence, "It is a few hundred feet from the Oregon side of the river, much closer than to the Washington side." meant it was a few hundred feet from Oregon and much closer to the Washington side. --Android Mouse 02:14, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: FWIW, I tripped over that sentence too, though I ended up concluding the island was closer to Oregon. Maybe a wee rewrite is in order. Congrats on the DYK though--I never heard of this island until the other day when it popped up on the new Oregon articles list. Katr67 02:44, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've reworded it slightly. Hopefully it is now more clear? --Android Mouse 02:57, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jurisdiction 

message: What is the origin of the name "18 mile" (as in the real estate listing) or "Eighteenmile" (as in this wikipedia article)?  — Athaenara  ✉  03:25, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name of island
Talk:Warcraft (Film)

message: For Anyone Who is about to Add or take way from the Article, I Gathered a Few Sources to base the article info on. Sorry for them Not Being in Headline Order.
#H&G: Tull Talks World of Warcraft Film
#Blizzard Entertainment and Legendary Pictures To Produce Live-Action Warcraft Movie
#IGN Warcraft Details
#GC 2006: Warcraft Movie Update
#IGN Blizz-Con '07 Video Interview
#Warcraft Movie Details Revealed At BlizzCon
#Brave new 'World'
#Legendary enters world of 'Warcraft'
#H&G: Blizzard's Pardo Talks WoW Film
Non Article Source
*Warcraft Movie Chronicles
--Mithos90 19:16, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cited Sources
Talk:Gregory Clark (economist)

message: This article presents only a sketchy and not wholly accurate of Clark's intricate argument.  It appears to be based mainly on the New York Times article cited. 
It would be helpful if people wanting to take up space here discussing it would read Clark's book first.  12.214.62.215 (talk) 21:33, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: A poor article

message: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/feb/04/social-mobility-equality-class-society  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.14.49.84 (talk) 21:11, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, I've just covered it in the The Son Also Rises (book) article, which I recently split out from this article.--greenrd (talk) 17:09, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clark's guardian article inclusion
Talk:Samoana abbreviata

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. Leaning consensus to move to the scientific name as the current name is not too common either. (closed by non-admin page mover) ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 02:07, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Short Samoan tree snail →  – Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think the common name is used enough to warrant it being the page title instead of the scientific name. 0x16w (talk) 07:54, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 11 February 2024
Talk:Springfield Armory M6 Scout

message: Barrel length on my factory Springfield M6 Scout is very close to 18 inches exact: less than 1/16 inch over 18 inches. It is certainly shorter than 18.25 inch. Naaman Brown (talk) 15:09, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, my Blue Book of Gun Values lists it as 18 1/2 inches.  Most measurements provided by manufacturers are approximate, but what matters here is what's verifiable.  Your measurement is a single sample, which might be shorter than typical, or your means of measurement might be flawed.  At any rate, it's considered  original research, and not usable as a reference.  scot (talk) 15:25, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Anyone contemplating any muzzle work on a Springfield M6 scout had better measure the barrel by ATF standards before and after any recrowning or choke boring. An examination of two specimens so far has shown barrel length close to 18 1/32nds and ATF does not go by the Blue Book of Gun Values, but by their original research in actually measuring the barrel. There is nowhere near 1/4 or 1/2 inch margin of error with the M6. Naaman Brown (talk) 18:36, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Barrel length 

message: A lot of the discussion in the civilian M6 Scout article actually addresses issues more proper for the military M6 Aircrew Survival Weapon article. Naaman Brown (talk) 03:07, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  this the M6 Scout version of the M6 Aircrew Survival Weapon 
MediaWiki talk:Protectlogtext

message: Shouldn't this page point to Special:Protectedpages, and not to "List of Protected Pages", since the special page is much much more up to date with any pages which are protected? GrooveDog (talk) 18:47, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, the list is just a handful of special: links including that one. I'm undoing your editprotected. ←BenB4 17:13, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

text: Done —METS501 (talk) 17:07, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

message: Define lnk trgt, please change :List of protected pages to :Lists of protected pages
Mlpearc (open channel) 21:56, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: — xaosflux Talk 22:31, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 8 March 2016