lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Boy Soldier Series

message: A search for "Boy Soldier" (International Title of book 1) took me to the article on "Military Use of Children" and a search for "Traitor" (United States title of Book 1) took me to the article on "Treason". The choices for [Traitor] don't include Boy Soldier Series, book 1
Sorry for the HTML butchering :(
DarkArcher25 (talk) 20:25, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boy Soldier and Treason
Talk:Llanelli Town A.F.C.

message: How is LLanelli pronounced? --82.143.195.103 17:01, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 

message: The history section has been lifted from  with minor changes. This needs to be rewritten to avoid copyright problems. noq (talk) 19:01, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately, this continues to be a problem six months later. I've reverted to the last non-tainted version of the article as of 3 March 2010. Copyright violation is a serious problem and it will not be tolerated here. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward: not at work) - talk 18:05, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: History section
Talk:Brazzaville Beach

message: I have added a plot summary for this novel with source information. Ivankinsman 12:21, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

message: The "beach" in Brazzaville is a real place.  It's where the ferries leave leave to cross the Congo River over to Kinshasa.  It's obviously quite different to the place that is portrayed in the novel. Presumably William Boyd knew this; I wonder why he chose it as the name for his novel? Kahuzi (talk) 08:29, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Real Brazzaville Beach
Talk:Kathryn Cramer

message: The new online version of the Science Fiction Encyclopedia has an indepth entry on me. --Pleasantville (talk) 16:50, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: SF Encyclopedia online
Talk:Formula Vee

message: Formula First in New Zealand, unlike it's American counterpart, still uses the 1200cc engine. Rack and pinion steering and converted VW disc brakes are allowed in the NZ rules. Engine sizing is referred to in this document, section 9.1 http://motorsport.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/2018-19-Sch-V.pdf — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.27.236.159 (talk) 14:07, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formula First in New Zealand 

message: I'm unsure of the relevance of the SCCA run-off section in this article. Shouldn't this article be about the class itself? Shouldn't any championship listings be placed in their own articles? The SCCA Run-off section seems somewhat arbitrary given that there are numerous other Formula Vee/First championships held in many places throughout the world. Cheers.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.27.236.159 (talk) 14:17, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relevance of SCCA Runoff section?
Talk:Macdonald Hall

message: It should be noted that the books were retitled for their (I think it was) 20th anniversary release.
Also, Mr. Korman has expressed an interest in rebooting the series, with either Bruno or Boots returning to MacDonald Hall as a staff member--I dont' know if there's any citation available for that.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.193.128.193 (talk) 13:19, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Titles
Talk:Bug-Jargal

message: An editor has "translated" the title as .
No other language of WP mentions any Mongolian connection. The book is set in Hispaniola.
The book does use Spanish in addition to French, e.g. in Ch. VIII (French Wikisource).
This conjecture would appear to be based on a coincidence:
Within the Mongolian province of Govi-Altai, there are two districts named Bugat and Jargalan.
Odd. Varlaam (talk) 06:33, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mongolian language 
Talk:Rockland, Maine

message: What happened to Rockland's Official seal? How/Why was it deleted, I cant seem to track down why or when it was deleted.--Azslande 17:04, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seal 

message: The data listed from 1960-1980 seems like it may be inaccurate.  In fact it seems very unlikely that the information is accurate.  If someone could check that it would be great.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by MrNewcomb (talk • contribs) 12:06, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I expect the population data are accurate, drawn directly from the US Census. What is of interest to me is an explanation for the 1950 to 1960 dramatic decrease, then the sharp increase 1980 to 1990, not yet matching the 1950 population. Does anyone locally know the story? The History section indicates changes in the economic strengths of the town, but does not tell a story to explain the shifts in population.  --Prairieplant (talk) 16:32, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical Population Data 

message: I changed University College of Rockland to UMA Rockland Center, which appears to be its current name; see University of Maine Augusta.  Zaslav (talk) 02:25, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Education 

message: In the History section, it is said that Rockland is an officially designated micropolitan area, but the US Census Bureau's Metropolitan and Micropolitan Statistical Areas Map seems to disput this. I also cannot see a reference in the article backing this claim up. It may be that I'm missing something, however?
https://www.census.gov/geographies/reference-maps/2020/geo/cbsa.html Summit09 (talk) 15:10, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Micropolitan
Talk:Bridge to the Sun

message: Is this the same woman who was the sister (or a relative?) of an American general on Gen. MacArthur's staff?  It would seem beyond mathematical odds that there would be two of them who married Japanese diplomats in Washington D.C. in the 1930's.  If so, this is a vitally important relationship to know, for historians and researchers.Starhistory22 (talk) 01:43, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this the same woman?
Talk:Burger's Daughter

message: Congratulations to all the contributors to this featured article. You deserve a lot of applause, recognition and appreciation. What a wonderful article.
:  Bfpage |leave a message  16:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you, I enjoyed working on it. I'm sure the other contributors feel the same. —Bruce1eetalk 04:53, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Congratulations!
Talk:Company formation

message: I am new to Wikipedia so I am not sure on the protocol for merging etc.
Company Formation is the term that is used for Incorporation in the UK, and most Commonwealth Countries.  Incorporation is the term used in the US.  The current Incorporation article is very US centric and does not get over the complexities of incorporation in the US since each state has different rules and procedures.
This article at present is a very short version, if I have more time it will need about 5-10 screens to explain the full process, and cover the history, paper incorporation in the uk, and electronic incorporation in the uk.
The current article would be fine as a sub section of a world wide incorporation article.  However it needs expanding, at which point it probably should stand on its own, and be linked back from the Incorporation (business) article.
RonaldDuncan 17:09, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: As it pertains the the US, this page is incorrect. In the US, creating a new business is called company or business formation. Incorporation refers to creating a corporation. Corporations are only one of many business entities. There may need to be a separate page devoted to US businesses if the information contained here only pertains the the UK.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brown Tax and Accounting (talk • contribs) 05:26, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  US Business Formation 

message: We are a company formation agent and we have information that we would like to add to the page.
If we add information on the page is there any way our page will show on the credits?
Any information you can provide will be appreciated
SallyatCFS (talk) 15:47, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Company Name in Credits
Talk:By the Shores of Gitchee Gumee

message: The synopsis states that the characters are from upstate New York, and this is a novel by Tama Janowitz. The statement that the characters speak in a way "reminiscent of New Yorkers in a Tama Janowitz novel" is asinine. THEY ARE New Yorkers in a Tama Janowitz novel, friends.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.1.105.94 (talk) 17:00, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: these characters are reminiscent of exactly what they are?

message: This article has been reverted by a bot to  as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) This has been done to remove User:Accotink2's contributions as they have a history of extensive copyright violation and so it is assumed that all of their major contributions are copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. VWBot (talk) 06:02, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Calculus on Manifolds (book)

message: Some random single Chinese blog is what we call a "source" to call the book "Baby Spivak".  I think that this reference should be removed as its never called "Baby Spivak" by the majority of the population of mathematicians.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.149.190.128 (talk) 21:37, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Baby Spivak?  really...
Talk:Metaquartzite

message: This is a tautology. Quartzite is metamorphosed sandstone. Metaquartzite is meta-meta-sandstone. Propose this for deletion.Rolinator 01:32, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed - redirected to quartzite. Vsmith 01:55, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Cane River

message: This article needs a great deal of work.  It seems to be acting as a disambiguation page but lacks the proper format.  Anyone up to helping me fix it?  Message me on my talk page.  Ashley {talkback} 00:02, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is this? 

message: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cane_River_Lake
==wondering==
We have Cane River article here and :Cane River Lake.  Are they the same geographic object or not?  What is their relationship?  Hmains (talk) 04:11, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplicate of article Cane River lake? 

message: We have Cane River article here and :Cane River Lake.  Are they the same geographic object or not?  What is their relationship?  Hmains (talk) 04:11, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: wondering
Talk:Shocked quartz

message: There's a picture of a piece at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Chicxulub_shockedquartz.png
shouldn't it be added to this page?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.65.48.66 (talk) 00:34, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

message: I think there should be a picture comparison under one.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.47.247.201 (talk) 22:12, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Microscope 
Talk:Sam Katzman

message: A passage reads: "In September 1944 Katzman was offered a job producing serials for Columbia Pictures, starting with Brenda Starr, Reporter (1945) He followed this with the serials Jungle Raiders (1945) and Who's Guilty? (1945). With typical thrift, he produced the first one on the side, using Monogram's actors and technicians."
What does this second sentence even mean? Does "the first one" refer to "Brenda Starr, Reporter" or "Jungle Raiders"? It could be either. And then, "on the side" -- huh? My guess is that the writer is trying to say that Katzman somehow made one of these films (I don't know which) at his previous studio somehow, but it's not clear and needs further explanation, since I'm not sure how this would even be possible. Jeri Southern (talk) 02:07, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification needed.
Category talk:Moradabad

message: This category will act as starting category for grouping pages related to Moradabad at one place and will also act as networking place to help improve pages related to Moradabad. May be wikipedian can create a new user category e.g. Category:Moradabad Wikipedians to collaborate more effectively. Vjdchauhan 17:16, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Effective and localized collaboration
Template talk:Music of Final Fantasy

message: I changed the header from from "Music of Final Fantasy" to "Discographies of Final Fantasy". While that header actually does link to Music of Final Fantasy, all the articles inside the template are "Discography of FF" pages, thus the (IMO) logical change. The header should reflect contents, not the exact link to the Mother Page. happypal (Talk | contribs) 08:54, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New title
Talk:Bowery at Midnight

message: I think this film is in the public domain and should be added to the Public domain films category. Okki 18:22, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright 

message: The following is unsourced information:
*In the opening credits, Lugosi is billed as portraying more than one character.  This is, in fact, inaccurate.  Lugosi plays one character who maintains separate and secret identities within the world of the film.
*At one point in the film, characters walk past a poster for The Corpse Vanishes, an earlier Lugosi film, replete with an obvious picture of Lugosi.
*If the reanimated corpses at the end of the narrative do qualify as zombies, then Bowery at Midnight is the first American film to portray zombies inside the United States. (that's a dead link)
While this is interesting, we can't use it unless you provide a source. Also, none of this is really trivia, as trivia by its definition is "unimportant information" - it therefore shouldn't be in a trivia section but instead the information should be incorporated into the main article. - Tbsdy lives (talk) 10:58, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced material
Talk:Château de Montaigne

message: Out of curiosity, what (if anything) does the name "Montaigne" mean?  Mount Aigne?  Does "aigne" mean anything?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.15.130.199 (talk) 21:03, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meaning of « Montaigne » ? 
Talk:Virtual Adepts

message: I cleaned up the page a bit, and added some detail, including a revision of the paradigm section and the addition of the "other traditions" section.  ShadowHare 17:28, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

message: I suggest this page be merged to Mage: The Ascension as it's mostly just plot summary and regurgitation of source material.  This much description is unnecessary.  --Craw-daddy | T | 18:38, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Moss agate

message: I'm not a regular wiki user so I'm not sure how to fix it, but those images are NOT moss agate!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.142.119.85 (talk) 17:55, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures of tree agate? 

message: How is this mined? What is the impact on the environment? 2600:1700:1E0:D380:6D07:4F61:43D4:A05F (talk) 13:08, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mining Agate
Talk:General quarters

message: Is it really necessary or appropriate to rely upon "Star Trek" to describe naval jargon? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.142.245.22 (talk • contribs) 
:A better example of a dramatic depiction of General Quarters would be the GQ scene from the movie The Final Countdown. After experiencing a freakish storm that sends his ship, the aircraft carrier USS Nimitz back in time and not knowing until later what had transpired, Captain Matt Yelland (Kirk Douglas) gives the order to the Officer Of The Deck to sound General Quarters. Wikiphyte 16:43, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Why use any such examples? They all seem to be evasions of the Wikipedia practice of deprecating pop cultural references in MILHIST articles. They should be removed.  PKKloeppel (talk) 14:48, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Pop culture vs. IRL

message: This term is used in the lead, and bolded implying it's an alternative name for the same thing, but is not further explained. When would it be used rather than GQ? 86.132.140.171 (talk) 01:42, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Significance of "Battle Stations"? 

message: I would like to question the fact that the term "General Quarters" is not used in the Royal Navy. At least it was used in the past. In "Scrimgeours Scribbling Diary: The Truly Astonishing Wartime Diary and Letters of an Edwardian Gentleman, Naval Officer, Boy and Son (Hardcover)" by Alexander Scrimgeour,  the author always uses the term General Quarters, mostl abbreviated as G.Q.
Herby666 (talk) 19:53, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: My understanding is that the term is no longer used in the Royal Navy, but that it was in the past. The article reflects the modern usage, not the historical. I am not sure when the term was dropped but it was sometime in the 20th century as I have seen references to General Quarters in the Royal Navy in a 1920s book somewhere. Dabbler (talk) 13:54, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Term "General Quarters" not used in Roayl Navy? 

message: The Horatio Hornblower book The Happy Return is called Beat To Quarters in the US.  Presently, trying to find the Wikipedia article for the book using that title brings one here via a redirect, with no indication that another article may exist.  It seem to me that either beat to quarters should be made a disambiguation page between here and the book article, or this article should get a hatnote referencing the book, but I'm not sure which.  Any opinions? gnfnrf (talk) 23:45, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hatnote or disambig for [[beat to quarters]]? 

message: and was formerly branle-bas de combat, literally meaning that sleeping hammocks should be cleared off the gun deck, rolled, and stowed on the upper deck of the ship as protection against musket fire.
That's clearly not the literal meaning of the phrase. The literal translation should be provided along with the actions the crew would have taken in response. 72.200.151.13 (talk) 21:50, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  French equivalent
Talk:Michael E. Raynor

message: Michael E. Raynor is one of the leading authorities on business strategy in the world.
He co-wrote The Innovator's Solution with Clayton M. Christensen.
Christensen's wiki entry references Mr. Raynor.
Thank you for your consideration,
Bluestripe 17:35, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This isn't a speedy candidate.  If someone wants to make a case for deletion here it needs to go through Wikipedia:Articles for Deletion.--Isotope23 19:43, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Declining Speedy Delete

message: I am concerned that this person is not notable. He is called a "best-selling" author, but there is no mention of how many books he sold or what list he was the "best-seller" on. That appears to be the only claim to notability that I can find in the article (just having a list of publications is something every PhD degree-holder has and is not sufficient to be "notable"). This article reads like a resume. Since I am not familiar with the business journals or his books' subject matter, I would like to ask if anyone can explain why they believe he is notable. Otherwise, I am tempted to list this article for deletion. - grubber 16:51, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Concerns about notability
Category talk:Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh

message: This category will act as starting category for grouping pages related to Ghaziabad at one place and will also act as networking place to help improve pages related to Ghaziabad. May be wikipedian can create a new user category e.g. Category:Ghaziabad Wikipedians to collaborate more effectively. Vjdchauhan 17:36, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Effective and localized collaboration
Talk:Overload (CSI)

message: In the opening scene, Gil states "...Terminal velocity is 9.8 m/s^2" This is an error, as that 1) the units are that of velocity (acceleration due to gravity specifically) and 2) terminal velocity for a falling human body is closer to 53 m/s.
:That's the reason I looked up this article. It should definately be mentioned.Misodoctakleidist 20:48, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Errors
Talk:Space Shuttle Challenger launch decision

message: This page was created as a subarticle of the Space Shuttle Challenger disaster page, and is intended to complement it by going into further detail regarding the background of the decision to launch. The main page is over 60K already, so a subarticle seems to be indicated. I am removing the notice, but am of course happy to discuss the decision further. Please see the main article's talk page for more information. MLilburne 17:39, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Unless it is expanded it should be deleted. As I stated in the nomination enough infor can be found in the Space Shuttle Challenger disaster article. --Tainter 17:45, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is going to be expanded, but that is going to take some time as there are several interested editors and we need a base to work from. The amount of information in the main article is only the tip of the iceberg, as there have been whole books written on the decision. It is clearly a notable topic that deserves discussion in more detail than can be offered in the main article. MLilburne 17:47, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In keeping with Wikipedia:Article size, this article is needed to prevent Space Shuttle Challenger disaster from getting any bigger, and hopefully reduce it in size. It's exactly the same as when the Space Shuttle article became too big, and we split the material into subarticles such as NASA Space Shuttle decision, Space Shuttle abort modes, etc. Those now-separate articles were formerly too-large subheadings in a big monolithic article. The purpose of this article is similar. There's a lot of information various editors want to add on the Challenger launch decision, but it would make the main Challenger disaster article too big, hence this article is needed.  By any reasonable standard the material is historic and meritorious. I don't see what the problem is. Wikipedia guidelines specifically call for this procedure. See Wikipedia:Summary style. Joema 22:42, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Not a redundant page

message: This article shows a picture of the ice build up, but does not discuss the effect of the cold temperature.  The temperature was colder than critical components had been subjected to in qualification testing, so the launch should not have taken place.  This is a much more critical part of the launch decision than the theoretical discussion of possible modes of failure. L3kn (talk) 01:08, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Effect of Cold Temperature

message: Why is this a stub? KConWiki (talk) 02:21, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed the Stub tag and reassessed the article as Start. Rpyle731talk 09:48, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub

message: This article was forked about 4½ years ago, and still does not contain any information regarding the actual launch decision. The background information that is here can easily be merged to the Space Shuttle Challenger disaster article, without any adverse effects on the length or readability of that article. --Bongwarrior (talk) 06:56, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Product of rings

message: Why is it that an ideal in the direct product of a countable number of copies of R is a direct product of ideals in R?   Surely, the ideal of sequences that are 0 almost everywhere is a counter-example.
i found this odd also. for reference, in hungerford, algebra p.135, there is an exercise which mentions that R_i must all have unity to fulfill this converse... --Thinkinglex (talk) 08:35, 29 September 2008 (UTC)