lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Maintenance

message: /Village pump: a relevant discussion archived from the Village pump: . • Benc • 08:46, 17 Sep 2004 (UTC)

message: Should we recommend that de-inclusions be signed by whomever performed them? It adds a little more clutter, but it would help  keep the paper trail alive (which is a good thing). • Benc • 09:08, 17 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Signing de-inclusions 

message: I like this proposal quite a lot.  And your rule of thumb is exactly the rule I've used when I made those recommendations myself.  I would recommend pulling the paragraph about copying the Tally to a sub-page though.  A long vote is hard enough to track without having to worry that the tally sub-page might now be out of synch with the discussion page.  It just seems too difficult to maintain.  Thnaks.  Rossami 16:09, 17 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I figured you would — much of it is based off of what you've been doing already. :-) • Benc • 17:35, 17 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  General comments 

message: Uncle G's alternative procedure is probably easier but won't it also break all the links to the original discussion?  Now the old links will point to the new discussion.  In some cases, it may create confusion - for example, if I link to an old discussion as an example or precedent on a decision, a research technique or an RFC about an abusive participant.  Rossami (talk) 19:34, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renominations alternative procedure
Talk:Notion

message: For a September 2004 deletion debate over this page see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Notion
----
Why did I blank this page? Explanation:
# Somebody wrote an article entitled 'Notion' about the slang of Winchester College.
# On checking the 'what links here' page for that 'Notion' article, I realised that a couple of pages refer to notion - but the mathematical sense of 'notion'.
# I've moved the slang article to 'Notion (slang)', and blanked this article - there's no chance of me writing anything here, due to my low low low maths knowledge.
- Aakash Khanal 08:37, Sep 17, 2004 (UTC)
Better practice is to use Move Page, which would automatically make this a redirect to notion (slang). Then this notion page can still in future be edited separately.
Khanal Aakash 09:07, 17 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Over the Rhine (band)

message: Text from http://www.overtherhine.com/otrstory.php is copyrighted 2007 by Over the Rhine. The owners of the website can donate material by following the guidelines at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. However, copyrighted material is not allowed on Wikipedia so it must be removed. J.H (talk) 05:27, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright Violation 

message: With no mainstream commercial success, no hits, not even any singles listed, how is this group notable enough to warrant an entry? The only people who know who these clowns are are people in Greater Cincinnati area. Literally outside of that, nobody knows or cares, and Cincinnati is a tiny flyover market, so that's a double who cares. I see so much crap like this on Wikipedia. Good for them. They'll be remembered as another mediocre, went nowhere group of dreamers from the midwest. Awesome! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.10.232.196 (talk) 18:30, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: They have multiple album articles and that is enough for us to have an article for the band. They're actually quite well known in their field throughout North America. Say hello to Chagrin Falls from Wikipedia. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:41, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  How is this notable?
Talk:Interior algebra

message: Will add more stuff relating topomorphisms to continuous maps and homorphisms to open continuous maps, as well as a bit about category theoretic formalism for whats going on. In time will add history section.
- 13 Oct 2004
Ok I removed the TeX because it was just too ugly, please don't bring it back. I've made all xs and ys italic. 28 Sep 2004
What do you guys think about the change to TeX? Personally I think it makes the page look ugly. Also why the use of the |-> its not the way one normally writes the signature of an algebra? 26 Sep 2004
Why did someone add the word "fake" to the end of the Heyting algebras section? Some gripe against intuitionistic logic???? 24 Sep 2004
The law of excluded middle is either true or false! 24.7.87.135 02:41, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Older talk

message: The definition of generalized topological space states that T is closed under arbitrary joins.  This seems to imply the fourth condition, that for every element b, the join exists of those elements in T that are covered by b -- by the second condition this join is simply an element of T.  What am I missing?  --Ott2 08:16, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, you are missing the fact that "closed under arbitrary joins" does not mean that arbitrary joins always exist, it means that when they exist they will be in T, so some subsets of T may not have a join, the fourth condition says that the sets of elements of T below a single element of B will always have a join. I will clarify in the article. Kuratowski's Ghost 12:33, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Definition of Generalized Topology

message: The article launches into a definition straight-off, while leaving the "good stuff" for much, much later in the article. Would appreciate having an introductory paragraph explaining in general terms, what this is good for, and the nature of the exciting theorems and isomorphisms that the algebra generates. linas 16:23, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Executive summary? 

message: Directly indecomposable was just redirected to direct product. The article currently states "X is connected if and only if A(X) is directly indecomposable." Please ensure that this usage is correct for this article, otherwise there may need to be a disambiguation page. ᛭ LokiClock (talk) 20:53, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition of directly indecomposable
Talk:Idul Fitri

message: This is completely wrong...Idul Fitri is the feast after the Ramadhan (from Arabic 'Ied-ul Fitr) and although maybe in some part of Indonesia people eat Ketupat for this occasion, this is not true for the whole of Indonesia. I will try to make a better version of this entry... MartijnL 09:56, 17 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Oyster Bay (hamlet), New York

message: ::I removed this line from the article "Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie also live in the hamlet today, as well as Jennifer Lopez, 50 cent, Alicia Keys, and many more."
::The line was removed because the "notable residents" section should only include people who either grew up or have a long association with Oyster Bay (Thomas Pynchon would fit the former, Teddy Roosevelt the latter). The celebrities like Brad Pitt or 50 cent basically moved to OB after getting rich, that doesn't really connect them to the town in a notable way.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.73.31.184 (talk) 17:00, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable Resident Section

message: Where is the discussion? What is the rationale? The talk pages did not get moved in parallel? Residents of the TOB refer to it as TOB - especially to make it clearly distincr froim the hamlet. I believe residents of other TOWNS on LI do the same - Hempstead, Huntington, Babylon, etc. Plus there are now loads of redirects --JimWae 04:13, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: Does it consist of
Oyster Bay
Oyster Bay Cove
Cove Neck
Bayville
Centre Island
East Norwich
& Mill Neck? 2600:4041:55F8:A400:C01F:C076:9BAC:4C02 (talk) 02:21, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  What communities does the greater Oyster Bay area consist of?
Talk:Nicola Griffith

message: Perhaps somebody who has actually read much of Nicola Griffith can flesh out this page.
--Martin Wisse 10:36, 17 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The early life section needs to be drastically condensed, a blow-by-blow account of her adolescence is clearly too much. The section dominates the entire article while actually the career section should be the main body of the article. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 07:17, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right. I'm on it. RSN! --Pete Tillman (talk) 05:44, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early life section is excessive 

message: I have commenced a tidy-up of the Bibliography section using cite templates. Capitalization and punctuation follow standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, as much as Wikipedia templates allow it. ISBNs and other persistent identifiers, where available, are commented out, but still available for reference. Feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 03:06, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography
Talk:Walsh function

message: I have no idea what this is about. Can someone rephrase this article in similar terminology please? I encountered it while reading through Modern Digital and Analog Communication Systems by Lathi 4th edition on page 50 section 2.7.4 Some Examples of Generalized Fourier Series.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.126.206.55 (talk) 19:13, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It would be great if you could incorporate that into the introduction. I have no knowledge on the subject. X-Fi6 (talk) 08:06, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Rajpath

message: If you go here: You'll find an aerial photograph. The center of the Hexagon is the place where King George's statue was placed - removed after independence. India gate is to its left. The Oval is the National Stadium. Rajpath runs straight from the oval through the center of the Hexagon to Vijay Chowk. The Long white lines on either side of Rajpath are the water bodies that I first described using the word Pond, then Canal and now Pool. They are three feet-four deep. If you know what the right word is please use it.............
They are artificially formed small bodies of still water? Then they're ponds. Average Earthman 11:40, 17 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Note:  Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 05:26, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Delhi Addition 

message: Why Rajpath is made ? 117.99.228.214 (talk) 14:42, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rajpath 

message: It now should be moved from Rajpath to Kartavya Path.￼ Rahil1610 (talk) 08:58, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It is referred to kartavya path already in most media. In twitter and reddit discussions it is highly apparent that people are using the new name much more than rajpath. 2601:5C0:C280:C6D0:D444:85D7:FA8D:AD57 (talk) 20:37, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, that's why i am saying Rahil1610 (talk) 04:31, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: rename rajpath and make kartvyapath Musicalartist071 (talk) 10:03, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move this page from Rajpath to Kartavya path 

message: For those of us not knowing Hindi it would be nice to have a translation of Kartavya.  (It's not in either of the two news articles linked, which are Indian media and reasonably suppose their audience already know the word.) —Tamfang (talk) 23:21, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  translation 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. Not WP:COMMONNAME (closed by non-admin page mover) ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 17:22, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Rajpath →  – "Rajpath" was the original name of this template, and we should revert to Kartavya Path. Maheep Singh24 (talk) 09:28, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

text: Oppose Since not WP:COMMONNAME, Delhi Tourism site still has the old name. Economic Times, Zee News used it in Dec 2023/ Jan 2024 for Republic day celebrations. Redtigerxyz  Talk  17:10, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 7 April 2024
Talk:Iguanodon

message: Personally, I believe that the remark that fossils were found in "two well-known bone beds" is not necessary, because no findings from bone beds are explicitely mentioned within the text, or at least nor marked as such. Please correct me if I've overlooked or misunderstood something. Alrik Fassbauer (talk) 20:25, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Remark about "found in bone beds" not necessary

message: Re Mantell: "His passing" is a bit twee, isn't it? If you mean his death, why not say it? Macdonald-ross (talk) 18:57, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death
Talk:Annalen der Physik

message: Hello. I wonder if there is any online archive for articles of Analphysik. That would be a terrific resource to look up historical papers such as Einstein's. Regards & happy editing, Wile E. Heresiarch 14:06, 17 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Archive?
Talk:Jæren

message: Two questions: the article stated that Jaeren has "very little soil covering the bedrock" - how does this agree with the extent of agriculture? Furthermore, it was stated that "the coast is without skerries". There are rocky islands off Tananger and there is also the archipelago of Kvitsøyane, so if these areas are counted as parts of Jaeren the bit about skerries cannot be true. Kosebamse 14:19, 17 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: This is wrong. When people speak about Jæren or 'Nord-Jæren' (North-Jæren) they are talking about the Stavanger-Sandnes greater city region. Jæren is a peninsula of which all towns and municipalities are strongly connected to Stavanger/Sandnes. You may say that Jæren is a peninsula of many towns, but Stavanger/Sandnes is the 'heart' of the region. --Simenhjort (talk) 14:57, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

text: I agree, Jæren constitutes all the municipalities from Randaberg in the north to Hå in the south, even though many inhabitants in Stavanger usually regard Jæren as the area around Hå, Time and Klepp. The article should be revised so that the four articles about the districts of Rogaland cover all municipalities in the county and do not exclude any (At the moment, Stavanger, Sandnes, Sola and Randaberg are not included in any of the four districts.    —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.208.164.170 (talk) 19:23, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

message: This is the only page in English Wikipedia using this term, which is in reference to the municipalities in question using both Nynorsk and Bokmål (so it would seem).  To English-language readers the English term "Neutral" might be confusing (neutral in what?) but the Norwegian word even moreso.  Would it be alright to substitute "Nynorsk and(/or) Bokmål" in those spots in the table?Skookum1 (talk) 14:12, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: "Nøytral"
Talk:New institutionalism

message: The third sentence is really sloppy language. I don't know the field, so tell me, in defining new institutionalism, what's the article trying to say here? "One of the instiutional views that has emerged has argued that institutions have developed to become similar isomorphism across organizations even though they evolved in different ways, and how institutions shape the behavior of agents (i.e. people, organizations, governments)."
I tried to reword it to recover the meaning and I got something like: "One of the institutional views that has emerged has argued that institutions across (within?) organizational fields, though they evolved in different  ways, have developed to become isomorphic in the way they shape the behavior of agents (i.e. people, organizations, governments)." That's a sentence I can at least understand; is it right? Does it actually describe what is novel about new institutionalism? Kyle Cronan (talk) 01:32, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Intro very confusing

message: this whole page is a bit confusing. "new institutionalism emphasizes sociological views of institutions" whereas "old or historical institutionalism is from the tradition of dewey, veblen and others and is opposed to the new institutionalism since the new places an over-emphasis on maximizing behavior" ???
that makes no sense! is new institutionalism emphasizing social and cultural behavior or maximizing behavior???  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.173.33.161 (talk) 08:06, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure. When you click on "history", you can see who has made each edit to the page.  Most people also sign their comments; click on the "Lunkwill" link at the end of my comment and you can leave me a personal message on my page, or leave it here and I'll see that it's been edited recently, because it'll show up on my "watchlist".  You can have one too by creating an account, which requires only choosing a username and password.  Lunkwill 23:17, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [[New institutionalism]]
Talk:Albert

message: How is Albert pronounced? Like All-bert or like El-bert? --84.163.36.60 (talk) 21:55, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 

message: I can't find the article for Albert the Great!  I typed it in the search but it led me to an article about an Italian philosopher.  And I don't see it listed here.
* Maybe you are looking for Alfred the Great. Martg76 19:44, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Albert the Great of England
Talk:Deep (Peter Murphy album)

message: This sentence seems a little vauge to me:
   "There seems to be some confusion, the year 1989 is stamped on the tray card and disc."
The sentence above seems better suited for this discussion page, but it got tacked onto the entry page instead.  It would be nice to clear up the release date.  January 1, 1990 was a Monday which is at least an appropriate date for a U.K. release, but not for a U.S. release, which usually occur on Tuesdays.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.121.174.188 (talk) 01:32, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Interstate 405

message: Any comments about putting the highways into separate articles titled Interstate 405 (California) and Interstate 405 (Oregon)?? Both sections are large enough that they can go into articles of their own that aren't stubs. Any objections?? 66.245.16.193 15:47, 17 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the Oregon portion is really short (like the freeway itself). It seems like most of the 3 digit interstate pages are organized this way.--Clipdude 04:02, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think it would be accurate to call 405 a "loop" rather than a "spur". Spurs branch out and do not reconnect with the parent interstate, unless I'm mistaken.--Clipdude 04:05, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spur? 

message: Hi,
Living in the Los Angeles area, I'm probably biased, but -- while 405 in portland and seattle are also major freeways in the area (i grew up in seattle, so i know the importance 405 has to that area) -- the california one is probably the most notable of the three, and is referenced far more frequently in pop culture.  Would it make sense therefore to have this article default to 405 in california and include a dab notification at the top in italics, much like how Windows goes to microsoft windows?
-User:Atanamir  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.127.160.175 (talk) 07:56, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Default to CA? 

message: Almost going to be perfect for all of Interstate 405 (Interstate 405 (CA); Interstate 405 (OR); Interstate 405 (WA)) to be located west of Interstate 5, but not Interstate 405 (WA) (being located east of Interstate 5).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.100.126.228 (talk) 12:31, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location
Talk:Interstate 76

message: Can anyone try splitting this article into Interstate 76W (the article for the Western Interstate 76) and Interstate 76 survives as the article for the Eastern Interstate 76?? Any objections?? 66.245.16.193 15:51, 17 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Is there a source for the western I-76 being named after Colorado's founding in 1876? I removed both commemorative numbers claims, and expanded on the PA one in its section. By the way, I'd support a split into Interstate 76 (west) and Interstate 76 (east), along with this becoming a disambig. --SPUI (talk) 18:25, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Commemorative number?

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Interstate 80S (disambiguation). Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Zerach (talk) 23:49, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Interstate 80S (disambiguation)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Dictionary of the Khazars

message: Shouldn't it be mentioned that the book is now printed in a so called androgynous edition and that the male and female versions aren't available anymore?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.106.174.234 (talk) 01:48, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Androgynous Edition

message: The fourth reference link does not work.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.74.102.249 (talk) 21:33, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference 4 is a broken link 

message: The article contains this passage: "the mass religious conversion of the Khazar people) is based on a historical event generally dated to the last decades of the 8th century or the early 9th century when the Khazar royalty and nobility converted to Judaism, and part of the general population followed"
The following article should be considered (and at the very least be mentioned in Wikipedia's articles on the subject):  
Stampfer, Shaul. "Did the Khazars Convert to Judaism?" Jewish Social Studies, vol. 19 no. 3, 2013, p. 1-72.
It is available free of charge on several websites (at least here: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/272587276_Did_the_Khazars_Convert_to_Judaism ).S. Valkemirer (talk) 03:24, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The alleged conversion of Khazars to Judaism seems to be fiction
Talk:University Village, Seattle

message: "U Village expansion on track for January start", Puget Sound Business Journal (Seattle) - December 7, 2001. by Betta Ferrendelli, Associate Editor. [--GoDot 18:53, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The article was originally named this way because it was meant to deal with both mall and neighborhood. Should there be two separate articles? --Lukobe 23:36, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Segment copied to Talk:Seattle, Neighborhood articles issues, per suggestion by Lukobe at Talk:Ravenna. Please see Talk:Seattle #U Village, continued there. --GoDot 07:39, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This reads like it came straight out of a marketing brochure.  It needs a cleanup and a section on the environmental impact controversies.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.161.86.196 (talk) 02:46, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thanks for the ad, U Village 

message: Continental Inc was not the original developer of University Village. My Grandfather E.C. Swanson was. I actually still have my bank book from Seattle Trust, bank account number one, dated February 8, 1955, given on U Village grand opening. Funfactsandfigures (talk) 23:02, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original developers