lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Lupin and Tonks family

message: Okay, this is the first page I have created. I went ahead and created it because there has been talks of deleting both Teddy Lupin's and Andromeda Tonks' pages. I felt calling it neither the Tonk's Family or the Lupin Family really accurate so I just went with Lupin & Tonks Family to combine the two families. If you feel the page is not accurate, or of inferior quality, feel free to edit and improve it. Lionheart08 03:52, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Creation

message: Not a muggle, he used magic to fix harry in the last book.  And book five calls him 'muggle born'
You're talking about the wrong Ted Tonks, this is the son of Tonks, not the father
Yoman786 22:06, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ted Tonks

message: I'm not entirly sure why, but sombody keeps on changing her house to Slytherin. I'm gonna deleate this agian, but could whoever is doing please stop. Keyblade Mage 02:10, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sirius states that he was the first Black to be in Griffindore, not Slytherin. So she was a Slytherin.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.100.207.122 (talk) 00:42, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Andromeda Tonks 

message: Should we really have Lupin merged in this article? He's important enough to warrent his own article, and most of his info got dropped on his way here. Same about Tonks. Keyblade Mage 00:36, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lupin
Talk:Tron: The Ghost in the Machine

message: This page used to redirect to Tron: The Ghost in the Machine.  But, because there is more than one comic titled Tron, I had re-redirected this page to Tron (franchise)#Comics.
allixpeeke (talk) 04:56, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improved redirection
Talk:Pink-legged graveteiro

message: Re-arranged the page so the references are at the bottom. Ideally needs footnotes created KLF Fitton (talk) 17:45, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The whole thing needs wikifying, editing for tone and neutrality. I've made a start. Sabine's Sunbird  talk 01:10, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Pool noodle

message: Removed:
A Noodleskin(custom noodle covers)can be placed over a pool noodle to make a stylish floating noodle seat.
That feels like the advertisement. At the very least, "stylish" should be attributed to a RS or removed.
The article is still a little bit of a mess -- but this way it's less embarassing. MosheZadka (talk) 17:51, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed "noodleskin reference"
Talk:Altera

message: Now that Altera is an independent company again, I updated this article and this comment is now resolved.
As of March, 2019, www.altera.com goes to an Intel FPGA web site, and does not even include the Altera name anywhere.  It appears that Altera has been completely absorbed by Intel.  Somebody more familiar with Altera than I am might want to change the present tense sentences (Altera is, Altera's products are..) to past tense (Altera was, Altera's products were...), and add any other relevant updates.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.240.213.197 (talk) 05:08, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article should be updated 

message: Yes, the article needed a fair amount of rewriting, which I have completed.
It was obviously written by a PR drone.
"Altera's Nios II and Nios soft core processors and HardCopy II & HardCopy devices are extending Altera's reach in addressable markets"
Agree. Advertisement.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.167.65.162 (talk) 08:40, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article sucks 
Talk:WITF-FM

message: The article speculates that the station is relatively low power because of nearby WAMU-FM.
Washington DC is around 120 miles from Harrisburg, well beyond the range of interference, even if the stations were on the same channel - but this station is on 89.5 and WAMU is on 88.5 - five channels apart.  The FCC only tries to protect out to 3rd adjacent channels69.37.2.254 (talk) 20:11, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Erroneous original research
Talk:Red-shouldered blackbird

message: Is this bird the same species and falls under the same genus as the Red-winged Blackbird, a bird very much common in the continental United States? 24.13.28.25 (talk) 08:31, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Same genus, not same species. I've greatly expanded the article from the corresponding eswiki article. Acroterion (talk) 20:10, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Same species as Red-winged Blackbird 

message: I have removed the image, it is clear that Audubon depicted what is now a subspecies of phoeniceus, A.p. gubernator. The image on Commons is attributed to the wrong species. It persists in other languages.  Acroterion (talk) 01:30, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Image
Talk:Tawny-shouldered blackbird

message: These birds are a nuisance in Cuban resorts hanging around outdoor cafes and restaurants looking to scavenge and good left even briefly unattended and taking food right off customers plates. Resorts have even played the sound of predators to keep them away but they are intelligent and they catch on quickly. As a tourist have them dive bomb diners for food and defecating on restaurant night tables and chairs make them quite a nuisance to vacationers and staff. 152.206.224.80 (talk) 00:04, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cuban tawny bird
Talk:Unicolored blackbird

message: When I first encountered this article, I was confused as to why a bird named the "Unicoloured Blackbird" was accompanied by a photograph showing a multicolored yellow and brown bird.  I did a little research and found that females of the species have this coloring, while the males actually have all black plumage as the name would suggest.  I added this information to the article itself.  I also looked for an image, and found an illustration in Wikimedia Commons of both the male and the female (which I added as best I could to such a short article).  I think this article would be improved if there was a photo of the male to go along with that of the female, but I haven't been able to find one yet with the proper copyright. Ritabuuk (talk) 03:01, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image
Talk:Oaxaca sparrow

message: I'm pretty sure that the Oaxaca Sparrow is Near Threatened not Least Concern. I don't know how to change this in editing though.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:3D09:F80:1A00:4C65:6F32:21B0:5821 (talk) 17:29, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Oaxaca Sparrow is Near Threatened.
Talk:Rufous-naped bellbird

message: I find this a very interesting fact about this bird that deserves mention in the Wikipedia page. Although, I know nothing whatsoever as to how to go about editing the page, hopefully someone with better skills can square this away. Here's a link to some more information and the source that I learned this exiting fact from:
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/two-new-toxic-birds-discovered/ 166.182.86.63 (talk) 20:36, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rufous- naped bellbirds have toxic feathers and skin.
Talk:Blue seedeater

message: Two images by one uploader (). These were released, but apparently those are both the wrong species, so we're out of luck there. Richard001 (talk) 06:05, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos 

message: IUCN has not separately assessed Cabanis's seedeater. It has an assessment of "blue seedeater" but uses that name for the binomial Amaurospiza moesta. The assessment covers what are now (2021) Cabanis's, Ecuadorian, and blackish-blue seedeaters without distinction. Craigthebirder (talk) 20:26, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  No IUCN status
Talk:Blackish-blue seedeater

message: There is just one on Flickr , which won't be released. Richard001 (talk) 08:23, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo 

message: IUCN has not separately assessed the blackish-blue seedeater. It has an assessment of Amaurospiza moesta but calls it "blue seedeater". The assessment covers what are now (2021) Cabanis's, Ecuadorian, Carrizal, and blackish-blue seedeaters without distinction. Craigthebirder (talk) 01:22, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  No IUCN status
Talk:Midsayap

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  VernoWhitney (talk) 12:50, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Grey penduline tit

message: Just the one photo, and that one won't be released. Richard001 (talk) 10:26, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Got one. Sabine's Sunbird  talk 19:22, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I must have missed that one somehow... Richard001 (talk) 21:10, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flickr results
Talk:Australian Communist Party v Commonwealth

message: Commonwealth has been misspelled in the top right bit above the Coat of Arms.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.170.15.176 (talk) 09:29, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

message: Actually, it was the Communist Party of Australia, but weirdly enough the Communist Party Dissolution Bill did name it the Australian Communist Party (possibly creating a legal issue), and the case is officially named the "Australian Communist Party v Commonwealth". I'd like to know why the mistake happened. It's also made in ASIO files.--Jack Upland (talk) 19:00, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Apparently the CPA briefly changed its name to the ACP and then changed it back.--Jack Upland (talk) 22:41, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Australian Communist Party 

message: Did the Act ever take effect?--Jack Upland (talk) 05:00, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  What happened in the mean time?
Template talk:Japan nuke plant map

message: It may be useful, depending on how crowded it gets, to list active reactors in red (what's currently being used), and inactive/closed reactors in black. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 04:47, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've already been using a different color for closed reactors in other nations.  But Japan only has one closed nuclear reactor and it's right next to (or the exact same site) as another, currently operating, reactor.  That's why there's a marker for the future plants and not the closed ones. -Theanphibian (talk • contribs) 05:37, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That works. Perhaps one color for currently operating plants, and one for future plants. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 06:20, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Active, not active

message: Kaminoseki NPP location is marked incorrectly, it needs to be moved north to the southern tip of Yamaguchi Prefecture. See this page for co-ords > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaminoseki,_Yamaguchi & this map for proof, if you want it > http://www2.jnes.go.jp/atom-db/en/general/atomic/ke02a13/images/map_p.gif
I'm no good with this sort of thing, so I wont try to edit it myself.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.20.10.33 (talk) 21:14, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kaminoseki NPP location 

message: Marking Fukushima I as “active” is somewhat cynical.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.224.155.22 (talk) 08:43, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: All but Ōi are shut down. Delphi234 (talk) 03:23, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fukushima I status
Talk:Patrick Stevedores Operations No 2 Pty Ltd v Maritime Union of Australia

message: I believe there is an incorrect citation -- the correct one is: (1998) 77 FCR 456 , 79 IR 281 , 153 ALR 602, 27 ACSR 497, 43 AILR 7-761 Oats and Sugar (talk) 02:09, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Southern whiteface

message: Aphelocephala taxobox error.  "missing taxonomy template". 
Same through the 3 species, though parent is Auto and rest are manual (speciesbox)?
Southern whiteface
The fix doesn't help.
The template needs to be reset or edited..? 
Andocommando WA (talk) 09:59, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Species box error
Talk:JAPW Light Heavyweight Championship

message: Does anybody know the exact date B-Boy was stripped?  It would be good information to have.  Mr. C.C. 05:08, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Date B-Boy Was Stripped
Talk:Streaked spiderhunter

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Arachnothera magna - Kaeng Krachan.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on June 23, 2016. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2016-06-23. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:10, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Arachnothera magna - Kaeng Krachan.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon 

message: Any explanation for the name of this bird? The article leaves me wondering.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.241.146.106 (talk) 11:13, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I've the same query. Obviously, the spider connection has to do with its use of cobweb in nest construction - but why "spiderhunter" for a nectar feeder? Any insight as to why this came about? Btw, that's a lovely photograph. Haploidavey (talk) 15:28, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: One generally hyphenates compound adjectives when they appear together before a noun, as in "olive-yellow color." Tammystark (talk) 16:17, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Description
Talk:Sandyford Industrial Estate

message: At this time, this article is a straight duplicate of material in Sandyford and as such, should it be out here at all? Worth noting, as someone who has worked twice in the Sandyford area, that "Sandyford Industrial Estate" as such is one of at least three adjacent developments which form the terrible mess of warehouse-like office and light industrial facilities, another being Sandyford Business Park, and the third, across the main road, with some other name. 195.96.72.22 05:09, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, as someone who lives in Sandyford, I couldn't agree about the "terrible mess", but I don't have any strong views on the SIE having a separate article; it covers half of the Sandyford area and "the mess" employs 20,000 people. Locally, the adjacent developments have all been long regarded as simply part of the SIE. Also, the "warehouse-like office and light industrial facilities" are turning into to high-rise offices, hotels, apartments, shopping centres (and even a hospital) as quickly as the planners will allow. One of the most interesting areas in Dublin IMO. It's probably becoming big enough to merit a separate article. (Sarah777 21:21, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Article now merged with Sandyford Sarah777 (talk) 19:06, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distinct article?
Talk:Growlanser (video game)

message: Sadly, this article has a fatal flaw. It doesn't mention whether or not it was released in any other location than Japan.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.39.54.141 (talk) 01:10, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It was never released outside of Japan. You check the lone reference for that, if you'd like. Sima Yi 12:30, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Release
Talk:Private aviation

message: The picture makes no sense. It shows 5 people, but a Cessna 172 can seat only 4.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.202.187.138 (talk) 03:50, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think it implies that they are all going flying in the 172 at the same time, just that the aircraft is owned by the family. If you have a better photo then please do point it out. - Ahunt (talk) 11:30, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo
Talk:McDowell Grove Forest Preserve

message: Third paragraph, first sentence references a date range of "1934 to 194".  I don't know what this date should have been so I cannot fix it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gdcwork (talk • contribs) 08:27, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of "194"
Talk:Commercial aviation

message: This article was tagged for original research over two months ago, but no one posted any details about the problems here on the talk page.  Given the absence of details, I will remove the tag.  If anyone adds it back, please list the details here as well, so that Wikipedians can fix them. David 23:05, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original research? 

message: What are the requirements for strobe lights, indicators on a commercial passenger jet airliner?
What configuration is required by law? Are they for identification purpuses as well as visibility? 
What places on the plane are they required to be? i.e.: each wingtips, front and back top and bottom? Nunamiut (talk) 13:29, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strobe lights 

message: So in a huge, broad topic like "Commercial aviation" there's virtually zero content except for a short chapter on oxygen masks? Wow; time for Wikipedia to scrape up some more editors!
108.49.158.55 (talk) 22:23, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where's the article? 

message: This honestly feels like a stub-class article, with all the weird Latin American information, incredibly little information on anywhere else, and the broad subject matter. Anyone else in favour of reassessment? ASide8 (talk) 02:16, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub-class?

message: Both this article and Air travel cover much of the same material if any future Wikipedians are interested. DHHornfeldt (talk) 19:37, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger with Air travel 

message: — Assignment last updated by Lincol7 (talk) 13:04, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: English 111 First-Semester College Composition
Talk:Airport check-in

message: I was wondering whether checks are made inquiring to the reason for travel to other countries. This could reduce prostitution/human trafficking. For example, if a young woman or women, accompanied by a man travels from a developing country to a developed country and if the accompanying man is known to work at a shady dance hall, ... it can be assumed that the reason for travel could be illegal prostitution/human trafficking. Denying travel in these instances would make it economically far less attractive for traffickers (as they'll need to opt for different -more expensive- modes of travel, ie via car, train, ..).
In specific, airports of atleast [cities] should be foreseen with such checking. 
Besides this, the checking of visa's and being less easy-going on providing these to "dancers" at dance halls, ... would also be advisable; however this will probably not be possible in certain areas -i.e. in Europe, movement across borders is more or less free/unrestricted allready-.
KVDP (talk) 12:54, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Checks on reason for travel 

message: PaintedCarpet (talk) 15:16, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy edit In-town check-in section 
Talk:Noisy scrubbird

message: Do we really need to protect something called the "Noisy Scrub-bird?"  Maybe everyone would be better off if the foxes just had their way with them. 98.117.0.79 (talk) 08:54, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Conservation

message: ** being updated soon.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Charliecavanagh (talk • contribs) 19:56, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography for my cons. bio project
Talk:Check-in

message: The Spanish AVE-system requires a screening of baggage (not person) and check-in before boarding the train (no controls onboard the train). 80.161.77.79 (talk) 14:56, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Trains

message: I added a section on the social networking aspect of checking in and I am not sure if this should have an article devoted to this subject.  What do you think? Whoisjohngalt (talk) 21:11, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Social check-ins
Talk:Croatia men's national ice hockey team

message: Does anyone know if the team has an official site? TNXMan 00:50, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official Site? 
Talk:Acoustic shadow

message: A more recent example that I can personally attest to was in 1980. The May 18 eruption of Mt. St. Helens was not heard in Portland, about 50 miles to the SW, but heard to the east (downwind) many times further away. CFLeon 05:39, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Other Instances

message: I'd like to see a better explanation of the physics involved.  "Wind" does not seem likely (at least to me) as a causal factor in creating a "sound shadow" anymore than it would affect a "light shadow".  Differences in air density due to temperature differences, would seem to be a more likely causal factor.  In the ocean "sound shadows" are also created, but their cause lies in temperature differentials between different masses of water.  
13:14, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Physics
Talk:Baeolophus

message: I propose that titmouse be redirected to this page instead of to tit (bird). The term titmouse is an almost exclusively North American term which has been used instead of tit for a huge number of Wikipedia pages, likely confusing many Old World Wikipedia users. (The "almost" was in reference to its archaic use in the British Isles.) All titmice called such clearly are part of a distinct radiation, Baeolophus. All birds with "titmouse" in their names are here, and all birds here are "titmice". Please keep this in mind while considering this proposal: What do people want to see when they type in "titmouse"? That is to say: if not Titmouse, Inc.. I think an expanded version of this page would fit the bill best. If you have anything to say, please put it below. If you have anything tell me, please see my talk page Innotata 16:52, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Titmouse sounds fine. It's fairly common for common names to be used for genera when the name only applies to that genus. Sabine's Sunbird  talk 02:59, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Titmouse
Talk:ViXS Systems

message: So, this is an advert then?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.226.196.251 (talk) 00:00, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, the company exists and it is large enough to merit a wikipedia page, but the article does need some cleanup since it looks a lot like an advertisement 67.226.153.225 (talk) 19:54, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Sauk Valley Community College

message: I think the general notability tag is unwarranted.  SVCC is part of a larger system of Illinois community colleges that has very clear Wikipedia notability.  Providing adequate information on this system can only be accomplished by discussing its individual components.  Since those components are individual educational institutions, it makes sense for each one to have its own Wikipedia entry.  I will probably remove the tag in a few weeks if there isn't objection. --Belgrano (talk) 18:10, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability tag
Talk:Avro Andover

message: The article currently has a first flight of 28 June 1924. This is in fact the date of the first Andover displaying at the RAF Hendon Air display according to "Avro Aircraft since 1908" and so is extremely unlikely to be the date of its first flight.Nigel Ish (talk) 19:31, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  First flight