lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of female golfers

message: Kville105125 00:21, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hinako Shibuno. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Willbb234 (talk) 11:40, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Hinako Shibuno" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Pruritic urticarial papules and plaques of pregnancy

message: Add diagnosis section,
Add etiology/mechanism section and information,
Add SxS,
Add information about SxS/information on different skin,
Add information about post-partum and mother QoL,
Add meta-analyses/systematic reviews for most up-to-date research on PUPPP,
Update and review citations/references,
Add information to treatment section,
RJonesUCSF (talk) 21:11, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Foundations II 2020 Group 23 proposed edits

message: This article was initially categorized based on scheme outlined at WP:DERM:CAT. ---kilbad (talk) 23:16, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article categorization 

message: C.Chung, Future PharmD (talk) 21:12, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Foundations II 2021 Group 8 Peer Review
Talk:Phoenix Five (prank)

message: I would like to move this article to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phoenix_Five once the TV series article has been moved.  I am giving this move time for discussion.  DEMKID 00:30, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Per a requested moves discussion, I am leaving the main Phoenix Five page as is, and am moving this page to Phoenix Five (prank).  DEMKID 16:54, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:François Guillaume de Castelnau-Clermont-Ludève

message: Can someone fix the embarrassing spelling of the main title of the article:  it should read  CLERMONT-LODEVE  with an "O" not a "U".  What must the French Wikipedia think of us??  --Vicedomino (talk) 04:52, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Horrible Misspelling
Talk:State of Katanga

message: Hi everyone,
Just two suggestions:
* A list/table about the composition of the secessionist government. It remained the same during the secession (except Kiwele and Samalenge, they died but were not replaced). I have recently created some WP pages of Katangese government Ministers (Lucas Samalenge, Joseph Kiwele, Albert Nyembo), and sources about the composition of the government are easily consultable online (e.g. on page 331).
* Change the line in the infobox about the President: Tshombe's executive role was taken over during a brief period in 1961 by a triumvirate of Munongo, Kiwele, and Kibwe, when Tshombe and Kimba were arrested during the Coquilhatville conference in 1961.
I wanted to make these two changes, but it's perhaps better to table them here first.CBJH (talk) 13:00, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The first bullet point is an excellent suggestion, this article lacks sections outside of chronological history completely. Regarding the infobox, such changes should only be made if there is an area of the article text which supports those changes. Currently this isn't really established, and it seems it was a very temporary situation that may be too detailed for an infobox. CMD (talk) 14:35, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two Suggestions 

message: The article leaves one with the impression that the Katanga secessionists were the "bad guys", eventually defeated by the influence of the USA and UN "peacekeepers". Maybe this is so. But the final result of crushing Katanga was to deliver the whole country into the hands of the thuggish kleptocrat/dictator Mobutu.
While the UN "peacekeeping" forces were taking out Katanga's defenses, Mobutu had Lumumba - a more-or-less democratically elected leader - arrested, tortured, and murdered. Nobody can maintain that it wasn't obvious what Mobutu was like.
I don't know enough about the history to flag the entire article for violation of NPOV policy, but it does seem to me that some balance could be injected. It really was not a case of separatists=bad, anti-separatists=good.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Longitude2 (talk • contribs) 16:52, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I think I broadly agree. We have quite a few articles on Wiki which tend to focus on the more picturesque aspects of the secession - especially the use of mercenaries - at the expense of the politics. There are also some obvious issues in this article. What does "ultra-right-wing" mean, for example? There are plenty of worse article, though. The lack of context in Siege of Jadotville is a particularly egregious example. —Brigade Piron (talk) 18:17, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The big picture?
Talk:Psoriatic arthritis

message: Discussion pointer: Talk:Psoriasis#Psoriatic arthritis. --Geniac (talk) 14:18, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Contradiction

message: The Psoriasis article and this one have differing prevalence ranges, with the
Psoriasis one poorly sourced.
While the PubMed search "prevalence of psoriatic arthritis (review[pt])"
gave 155 results with respectively (2000:2012[dp]) 119  (2005:2012[dp]) 83 (17 freely available)
for the date range restrictions.
* (quote from PubMed abstract)
Could someone with domain knowlege decide if any of these should go in
*
*
*
*
*
*
RDBrown (talk) 14:43, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Prevalence and refs

message: Hello,
I am a freelance writer working with the National Psoriasis Foundation to improve public education about psoriatic arthritis. The Foundation asked me to edit the wikipedia entry on this disease. It is my intention to use wikipedia's recommended outline for medical articles , and to incorporate the most current medically-reviewed information from the National Psoriasis Foundation and the Arthritis Foundation.
Please let me know if you have any thoughts on this!
amy stork NationalPsoriasisFoundation (talk) 22:38, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The most important thing from my perspective is that you makes sure you follow WP:MEDRS. Otherwise welcome aboard.Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 23:43, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intent to revise page 

message: This is the best recent review article I could find. 
Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 
2016 Jul;77(7):C102-8. 
doi: 10.12968/hmed.2016.77.7.C102.
Psoriatic arthritis.
Durham LE, Taams LS, Kirkham BW.
--Nbauman (talk) 22:18, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, I'll see if I have access and try to incorporate it into the article. TylerDurden8823 (talk) 03:39, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Br J Hosp Med  

message: It would be helpful if there was an outline of the history of psoriatic arthritis in medicine (and how the history relates to psoriasis). PigeonChickenFish (talk) 04:22, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:Rhinophyma

message: This article was categorized based on scheme outlined at WP:DERM. Calmer Waters 11:15, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article categorization 

message: Symptoms begin with an itching/tingling sensation in the nose, which will produce an oily film, followed by a hardening, swelling, blistering, & discoloration of the infected skin tissue.  The infection will usually last for several days & is likely to leave minimal scarring & discoloration.  Pores around the area are usually larger than in a non-infected individual both before & after the symptoms occur. The reaction can be brought on by certain foods/substances or through irratation to the nose.
It is most common in older white men but can be found in all all races & both genders.  Here's some exaggerated pictures of what it can become. http://www.dermnet.com/thumbnailindex.cfm?moduleID=1&moduleGroupID=21&groupIndex=1
   
  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.199.134.7 (talk) 02:53, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Symptoms 

message: Lots of pics available. Lets add one. 216.241.228.201 (talk) 00:56, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  We need a picture 

message: I work at sea and I've noticed tons of ex seaman with massive noses. 
All seem to have it a little bit but some more than others. It can't be a coincidence yet I can find no information on a link. 
This really needs to be investigated. I want to figure this out as I've been working at sea for 5 years and mine is beginning to grow (oh crap!)!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jago25 98 (talk • contribs) 09:44, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to working at sea 

message: The Gin Blossoms article directed me here, yet oddly enough, there is no mention of the term in this article.  Is this really such an archaic (albeit admittedly inaccurate) phrase? 160.111.254.17 (talk) 16:13, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gin Blossoms?
Talk:Seborrheic keratosis

message: I am a medical librarian at UC San Francisco and retired family practice doctor. I am working with a WP healthcare article editing class for 4th year UCSF medical students. This is our third time doing the class and we have our largest group, 16 students. During the first two iterations of the class I did not edit an article. I just helped the student find information for the articles and helped them edit. This time I am going to work to improve an article and thought the SK article might be good. C-class, high importance. Relatively simple topic, not a ton of literature, but extremely common skin lesion. As a family medicine doc these were the most common lesion people asked about. They look like they should be something, so people ask. At any rate I will be tinkering with the article.
Emwhitaker (talk) 21:31, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introducing myself
Talk:Vickie Chapman

message: Call me paranoid with all the goings on lately, but this is another article potentially affected by MPs/staffers with WP:COI. Timeshift (talk) 05:30, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks a bit sus to me, I've edited out the bias that may have been introduced but left the constructive changes (assuming good faith). Alex Sims (talk) 06:36, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Special:Contributions/Adelaide resident 08|Adelaide resident 08]] - possible MP/staffer 

message: Per article edit summary... sigh. Anyway, i've broken the page up in to sections, and added an expand tag to the last section as it's out of date/lacking recent events. Timeshift (talk) 21:01, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  expand tag added
Talk:Xeesal

message: I have found an article on this subject which, along with references therein, can help to bring in citations to this article.
The article:
Xeesal: la despigmentación cosmética en África subsahariana
Barja, J.M.; Berdeal, M.; Vares, M.; Carballo, E.
It is (currently) available in Spanish and English at 
http://www.elsevier.es/en/node/2083626
--Pelz2k (talk) 17:20, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible source material
Talk:2007 AFL season results

message: Hello All,
I have had a close look at this page, and I have noticed that the information in this page is also featured in the 2007 AFL season page. From reading the talk page for the main page, this page was created and the information moved because one of the editors felt that the main page was getting too large in size. However no attempt seems to have been made to erase the data in the main page, and insert a link to this page. Therefore I suggest that this page be deleted due to having duplicate (and excess) information.  Lindblum (talk) 13:45, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point, never thought of that, d'oh! Thanks for the advice Lindblum (talk) 14:25, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: No worries :) Jenks24 (talk) 14:34, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delete this page?
Talk:Z-plasty

message: This article could really do with some line drawings or photos to illustrate the technique. I will try and tempt a surgical trainee to add them.Doctorwithwound (talk) 19:37, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Added a diagram and a link to a photo on commons. Egmason (talk) 23:28, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Illustrations or photos please 
Talk:Hypoblast

message: I am removing the following text:
It covers the epiblast.
The hypoblast does not "cover" the epiblast. Rather, it lies beneath it (hence the root, "hypo"). I am sure the cited article would be of use in the future once this article has been expanded, however at this point there is too little information to warrant going into such detail. Quite frankly, I'm not sure why it was used to cite that text in the first place.--Smirkster 00:47, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

message: Beneath the picture of the article it says "Section through the embryo. (Hypoblast visible but not labeled.)". You basically have a picture that's supposed to convey to you information regarding the position of the hypoblast with respect to its surroundings, yet the hypoblast, which is the title of the article, isn't labeled?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.126.138.138 (talk) 20:33, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Is this a joke?

message: There is a better article about this matter in [WP in spanish], with sources, if someone wants to translate it. --Andreateletrabajo (talk) 03:42, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Translation
Talk:Brachioradial pruritis

message: Why does so much of this make me think someone found this webpage and just copied all of the complete sentences over here?  This page needs some work.  WhatamIdoing (talk) 02:49, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio?

message: The entire text of the Causes section and Treatments section is copied directly from the abstracts of the following articles, which are not cited by the author:
[1] Brachioradial pruritus: A symptom of neuropathy. Cohen AD, Masalha R, Medvedovsky E, Vardy DA. Departments of Dermatology and Neurology, Soroka University Medical Center; Dermatology Institute, Clalit Health Services, Southern District; and Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev.
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003 Jun;48(6):825-8. Abstract quote.
[2] Brachioradial pruritus: Cervical spine disease and neurogenic/neurogenic pruritus. Goodkin R, Wingard E, Bernhard JD. Division of Dermatology, University of Massachusetts Memorial Medical Center and Medical School. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003 Apr;48(4):521-4 Abstract quote.
[3] Brachioradial pruritus is associated with a reduction in cutaneous innervation that normalizes during the symptom-free remissions. Wallengren J, Sundler F. Department of Dermatology, University Hospital, Lund, Sweden. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2005 Jan;52(1):142-5. Abstract quote.
[4] Medical pearl: the ice-pack sign in brachioradial pruritus. Bernhard JD, Bordeaux JS. Department of Dermatology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2005 Jun;52(6):1073. Abstract quote.
All these abstract quotes are given (with citations) in http://www.thedoctorsdoctor.com/diseases/brachioradial_pruritis.htm
Brianstanl (talk) 22:56, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio, Indeed

message: Although "pruritus" is spelled correctly throughout the article, it is incorrectly listed as "pruritis" in the title of the page.  I am not an advanced Wiki user, so is there a way to change the title?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.52.7.78 (talk) 20:28, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  change title of page?
Talk:Diaphoresis

message: Is this page really necessary ? 
I thought Diaphoretic just meant sweaty
Surely the it could be included as a footnote under perspiration  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.146.186.66 (talk) 14:33, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger

message: I think large pieces of this article could be merged into Hyperhidrosis and Perspiration, leaving:
for pathological sweating, and
for physiological. Mikael Häggström (talk) 11:40, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge to hyperhidrosis and perspiration

message: I wouldn't merge this either; it's a different type of sweat. I actually came here looking for information for why pain/shock sweat smells so extremely foul in comparison to normal perspiration (colloquially known as "poo sweat" because it smells of excrement). Yet I could find no information on what it is that the body ejects during these times. If anyone has sources on this, they'd be a good addition to the article. --Snowgrouse (talk) 11:36, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Pain sweat
Talk:Margaret Bright Lucas

message: The words "alcohol" and "teetotalism" are absent from the article.
Nei1 (talk) 15:55, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Clearly Defined Subject

message: The article seems to lift large sections from the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by HStiles1 (talk • contribs) 13:26, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagiarism
Talk:John Goodwyn Barmby

message: Reference 2 (as of writing this) references EtymOnline as the source for Barmby learning "communisme" and/or "communiste" from François-Noël Babeuf. While according to the dictionary he'd need to've translated it from French, neither its present entry nor any of the Wayback Machine's snapshots of it reference Babeuf or his supporters. Seeing as it'd be a noteworthy part of the word's origin, an idea of the theorist and system of theories that the word was first meant for; it's weird to remove unless it was hard for EtymOnline's author to find supporting sources for the source they used. I believe the reference's only meant for Barmby being the first to use English "communism".
But I also found a supporting source for the Babeuf part. Reference 2's wrong about the second half of the sentence, so I'll move it to the first half where it applies (note that referencing's fine after most punctuation, not just periods). In its place after the sentence, I'll add a reference to Raymond Williams's 1983-published revised edition of Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society as a Wayback Machine archive of Amazon hosting it through its domain s3.amazonaws.com at http://s3.amazonaws.com/arena-attachments/1385668/2a0d6d0b045feef2adb6ae76ec9a2c92.pdf?1509502303 . Similarweb found the website to be safe at https://www.similarweb.com/website/s3.amazonaws.com/ . For real link skeptics, here's https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Similarweb . Raymond Williams was an influential cultural theorist with his own article in the Gale Contextual Encyclopedia of World Literature, where Keywords is mentioned as one of his major works. I'll use the Wayback Machine's 2020 snapshot; and I just saved a snapshot on December 26 UTC today, but it could take minutes to days to show as a result.
--Ντόναλντ (talk) 17:00, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference 2 is Misleading
Talk:Chronic testicular pain

message: I added the definition of "chronic" for this condition.  My reference is "https://www.asra.com/display_spring_2008.php?id=125" but the syntax has changed so much since I last contributed that I am unable to cite my work.  I'll come back to this as I figure it out, but if someone fixes it before then, I'd appreciate the assistance.   - Chrontius (talk) 04:28, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Retching

message: This article could be incorporated into vomiting unless there is some content worthy of note.Brinerustle (talk) 16:04, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: unnecessary article

message: Retching can occur without vomiting (as in the case of gastric volvulus) so while being related, retching not always precedes vomiting nor vomit does always occur after retching. 190.179.253.238 (talk) 02:14, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:
Talk:SLUDGE syndrome

message: The symptoms describe exactly how i feel like when i listen to Sludge metal music.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.196.135.142 (talk) 12:42, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sludge metal 

message: Most of the literature I've read on organophosphate poisoning uses SLUDGEM as the diagnostic mnemonic, salivation, lacrimation, urination, defecation/diarrhea, gastrointestinal cramping, emesis, muscle spasm. Some even use SLUDGEM-RA, adding respiratory distress and agitated mental state. Is this article drawing from an outdated source? I can't tell because there is no listed source, among other problems. --76.217.81.152 06:44, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've never seen it abbreviated SLUD, I've seen SLUDGE many times and, as you say, SLUDGEM too. I'll come back soon and fix this thing up with some proper sourcing. —Elipongo (Talk contribs) 07:22, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The SLUD mnemonic should be addressed because it's used in a relatively popular work of enviro-fiction, Zodiac by Neal Stephenson.  I'd originally thought this was the appropriate term.  207.188.232.179 (talk) 17:18, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Obsolete mnemonic? 

message: There is a note at the end of the article.  The note should be deleted and perhaps a disambiguation page could be added (with a link at the top of this article).  I would do it now if I weren't studying for finals.Garvin  Talk 07:38, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This has been resolved. Garvin  Talk 04:17, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semana Linux Universidad Distrital 

message: Useful content here merged with Cholinergic crisis as in consensus (see talk at that page).Roy Bateman (talk) 05:21, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge and Redirect
Talk:Donna Laframboise

message: I removed the notability tag, as we now have three substantial third-party sources for Laframboise -- Quadrant, Curry, and Fox News. --Pete Tillman (talk) 02:06, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: Temporarily removed link to "TripodGirl, Laframboise photo site" as MyWot indicates that this site was found to be hosting malware (Mal/lframeF as per Sophos) as of March 2014 by Yandex  ComplyAnt (talk) 09:20, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I put it back in, hopefully OK now? --Pete Tillman (talk) 20:44, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Malware report on external link

message: I went through recent edits and additions. Hopefully it reads better now.
I don't understand Note 10, "Compare the VIAF entry and Laframboises blog". It would be helpful to add ISBNs to the book cites. --Pete Tillman (talk) 21:47, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Ditto, the date sequence and topics re global warming were rather mixed up, I've reorganised the section so clarify the topics and show the IPCC response. . . dave souza, talk 18:25, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thny for the copyedting to all. To start some nittipicky, the actual review IAC disclosed actual weaknesses in the dealings with grey literature. Citing rules doesnt show wether they have a practical value or are being followed. Btw where is the ring of ExxonMordor now? I was told the US are ruled now by Holdren and other knights of the good side of the force. Serten II (talk) 20:40, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyedit & cleanup 

message: is clearly a climate denial organization. It pretends to be an institute but seems to consist only of a club and a mailbox. It does not do any research. There are no climatologist members. No one takes them seriously except other deniers. I cannot access the seven-year-old source for the sentence in the article that they are "climate change skeptics" but today it is known that they are just a primitive denialist organization. --Hob Gadling (talk) 17:57, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I can access the seven-year-old source. It doesn't mention Jäger or EIKE or any kind of "leugner", it mentions only one "Klimaskeptiker" (Christopher Monckton). So the sentence is just an unsourced statement about an organization with (apparently) no direct connection to Ms Laframboise. Peter Gulutzan (talk) 22:18, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: OK. That means the unsourced statement can go. I deleted it, and also the other ephemeral "who translated it" stuff. It does not belong in a biography. --Hob Gadling (talk) 06:34, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  EIKE
Talk:Sandford Orcas

message: My English text has a page on the Manor being a  haunted house, apparently from a book by photographer Simon Marsden, who seems extremely skilled at creating spooky images but I can`t find any independent confirmation? The story of hauntings in the 1960s and 70s also appears on the Medleycott family website  but they seem to own the property and charge admission so they cannot be considered neutral...Andycjp 01:04, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled