lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Fatman Scoop

message: Whenever I hear this guys voice in a song, it almost makes me lose control of my bowels. Seriously, if there's such a thing as a brown note, this guy could hit it. -- Mattrixed Talk 11:28, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I liked the song back then, partly because of his distinctive voice, but I'm pretty sure I couldn't take an entire album or more listening to a dude whose entire hook seems to be to yell. Even his one hit is mostly him just yelling random hype-words or phrases. 87.211.83.160 (talk) 07:32, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Most Annoying Voice In The World

message: I've just see a show on TV that showed an clip of a sex advice internet video featuring Scoop. Is this real, I can't find info on it anywhere else.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lemonsters08 (talk • contribs) 22:05, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Sex Advice Videos

message: Fixed, the old one was a porn site.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.175.199.249 (talk) 04:04, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Official Website

message: I'm just throwing it in here, and it's a wellknown discussion on wikipedia, but do we really NEED (or want) a FULL list of features? In a way there's actually TWO lists.
Most singles don't have their own page, and some ARTISTS don't even have a page of their own.
If Scoop's bread and butter is to play second fiddle to people, it kinda feels wrong to cut a list of what he does, but at the same time it's VERY niche. The artists he featured on have shorter lists of singles than this dude.
Surely having both lists is overkill. First the singles and then the artists by name.
Seeing he's mainly a one off for most of these names, rather than a recurring guest, I'm going with singles, and cutting the artists list. 87.211.83.160 (talk) 07:58, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  lists
Talk:Senjak

message: * Somebody suggested to me that the location of the Chinese embassy which was bombed in the 1999 NATO conflict with Serbia was in Senjak, although they were unsure. I am unable to find a source on the Internet which states the embassy's exact location within Belgrade at the time. So if anybody knows where the location of the embassy was, please update the relevant article (whether it be this one or another) to state it, or let me known on this talk page. — Informant763 06:17, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Chinese embassy which was bombed in 1999 - in Senjak?

message: * I have read in an article about the history of Senjak an implication that the name meant "the shady place", although, it wasn't explicitly stated that that is what the name meant and could also be interpreted as simply being a reference to a nickname which is used by the locals in Serbia. So I inquire, does Senjak mean "the shady place", and if so from which language does the name stem? –Sorter 09:41, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "The shady place"
Talk:North Toronto Collegiate Institute

message: This article needs desperate expansion.  Take a minute and help out! SaraK 04:27, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion

message: The reason I wrote "Notable Students, Alumni, and Faculty" is because not everyone who is notable who attended NT is considered an alumnus because they did not graduate, like Keanu Reeves.  Any thoughts? SaraK 01:31, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Alumni means former student. Many other school and university articles list non-graduates under alumni. See Notable non-graduate alumni of Harvard. --Usgnus 02:59, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Thanks for clearing that up! SaraK 17:30, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable Section

message: I deleted Eric Lindros from the notable alumni section.  I have always heard that he did in fact attend NTCI, esp. from teachers.  Unfortunately I have been unable to find any actual proof of his attendance, so I deleted him from this section.SaraK 17:18, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Eric Lindros

message: Should this article also include the school song in the sports section?  It was a big part of Red & Grey day.--Alkwan (talk) 00:58, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: School song

message: The intro to this article has bits of the school song in it (i.e. "Oh hail"...) and other gibberish; however, it is difficult to edit because the intro has not been sufficiently developed.  Could someone please add more content? --Alkwan (talk) 01:33, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Intro needs clean-up

message: Who is allowed to edit this page? If any one could edit this, I will too. Will start editing in 7 days if no one answers this question.Spider4731 (talk) 02:12, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Important Question
Talk:Compatibility (geochemistry)

message: I'm not an expert on chemistry per se; if someone could help me out by refining my comparison between nickel and iron (especially given the whole valence/ionic radius thing), your help would be appreciated.Archaen sax 09:58, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Chemistry

message: I remember the era of the Geological Compatibility "Football Club", especially the Plutonian versus Neptunian playoffs, the final, as it didn't take 350,000,000 years to watch, was quite a short and very eventful match. For this reason, I took to watching English versus Australia test cricket, known as the Ashes test wicket series, a truly uneventful and lengthy game.
Signed, the Phlogiston Debating Team.
BTW, you have a typo, I don't know how to fix. 1.136.107.39 (talk) 07:22, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Football Club?!
Talk:Dameli language

message: The article claims that the language is dying out, but according to Emil Perder, a Ph.D. student at Stockholm University who is currently working on a doctor's thesis on the language and has conducted field studies, this is not true. There are only about 5,000 speakers but according to him, children are being taught the language and people who move in to the area are expected to learn the language. Any comments on this?
Peter Isotalo 10:34, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Endangerment
Talk:Dawoodi language

message: I want to change the name of the language to Dawoodi language to the new name of it.  Here are the references - , , , .  It has been renamed in 2022. محفوظ ہمارے زبان (talk) 21:57, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: So the name "Domaki" is perceived as pejorative, and the recent publications use "Dawoodi" instead. I've now renamed the article. – Uanfala (talk) 13:09, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks محفوظ ہمارے زبان (talk) 03:07, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change name
Talk:Pashayi languages

message: I removed the notification that this page contains Indic characters, since it doesn't.  Afaik, the language is written with perso-Arabic script, so I'm not sure how this notice got added.  (The page doesn't contain any p-A script either.) Mcswell (talk) 20:31, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed Indic notification
Talk:Palula language

message: Because it is causing a Checkwiki error #72: "ISBN-10 with wrong checksum", I removed the ISBN from the entry:
The Languages Of Pakistan, Badshah Munir Bukhari . London
I have tried unsuccessfully to locate the correct ISBN on the Internet. Knife-in-the-drawer (talk) 05:49, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad ISBN 

message: The article must have a section that discusses about the Palula alphabet. —Etewilak (talk) 01:16, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Palula alphabet 

message: Multiple sources seem to be conflicting with this. Currently, both English and Urdu Wikipedia, along with Omniglot claim that it's written as "پالولہ", yet Punjabi Wikipedia writes it as "پھالولا".However, the IPA guide on this article's English Wikipedia page claims it's actually pronounced as /paːluːláː/. Based on the fact that the second a is also lengthened, wouldn't that imply that the correct spelling actually is پالولا? ThatDohDude (talk) 23:08, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: FLI Online also seems to write it as "پالولا", as seen in this alphabet PDF: [] ThatDohDude (talk) 23:12, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Alright, after further research, I have concluded that Palula's native name is actually "پالولا", and that "پالولہ" is an incorrect spelling, probably influenced by Urdu's "پھالولہ". Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong though! ThatDohDude (talk) 23:34, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @ThatDohDude The spelling in Urdu is Phalura or پھالورہ and that Palula or پالولہ is the Khowar spelling. Muhafiz-e-Pakistan (talk) 16:54, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Alright. ThatDohDude (talk) 21:01, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  How is "Palula" written in the native scripts?
Talk:Kata-vari dialect

message: The Bashgeli kafirs & their language By Gottlieb William Leitner
http://books.google.com/books?id=EeQLAAAAIAAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
Kafiristan: the Bashgeli Kafirs and their language By Gottlieb William Leitner
http://books.google.com/books?id=GG8IAAAAQAAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
The Bashgeli Kafirs & Their Language (1880)
https://archive.org/details/bashgelikafirst00leitgoog
Kafiristan: The Bashgeli Kafirs and Their Language (1880)
https://archive.org/details/kafiristanbashg00leitgoog
Notes on the Bas̳h̳galī (Kāfir) Language By John Davidson
http://books.google.com/books?id=OtdmPknTCBAC&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
Bashgali Dictionary: An Analysis of Colonel J. Davidson's Notes on the Bashgali Language By Sten Konow
http://books.google.com/books?id=ePzyRKnzOzEC&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
Rajmaan (talk) 23:28, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bashgali Kata language
Talk:Kalasha-ala

message: Renaming this page might be sensible if not for that Kalash language is already reserved for Kalaṣa-mun. Strand only seems to call this "Kalasha", with "Waigali" apparently a disambiguation workaround by resources like Ethnologue or Glottolog. Any thoughts from other editors? --Trɔpʏliʊm • blah 01:04, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Waigali language would be a better option. Kwékwlos (talk) 10:28, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:Sunbury, Pennsylvania

message: I had linked to a map for Reading that incorrectly showed Sunbury, but the image seems to have been corrected -- causing my image for this article to be wrong.  Might anyone have a map image or some photos of Sunbury? --Thisisbossi 10:09, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

message: I made a locator map and put it on the page - for some reason it would not thumb (size) so it is kind of big. My very long term plan is to make such maps for all municipalities in the county. You could also put the county locator map (in the County navbox) here if this seems unclear. I figure people can always click on the county and see its location in PA if they are unclear. Ruhrfisch 13:48, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Locator Map 

message: Shouldn't Thomas Edison be listed? I know he wasn't born in Sunbury, but Timothy Murphy wasn't either. Jimmy Wang Yu: Version 2 (talk) 02:28, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: If you can find a source, add him in. --Bossi (talk • gallery • contrib) 04:24, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: What is the connection? Ruhrfisch  ><>°° 04:32, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable People 

message: The murder of Troy LaFerrara took place in Sunbury and is quite a twisted and well documented story. The duo responsible for the death were dubbed “Craig’s List Killers”. Considering “Shithole of the Week” receives a paragraph in Sunbury’s article, perhaps a well documented national story should be included as well. It should be notable for being the exact opposite of an event thought to happen such a sheltered town as Sunbury. I lack the skills & experience needed to edit official articles, perhaps somebody with such skills can add the information and properly link and document the story. 98.235.68.109 (talk) 05:39, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Craig’s List Killers
Talk:Roy Hughes, Baron Islwyn

message: Thank you for expanding my article.  Dovea
Can't really add derogatory stuff without a cite, but I do remember (I grew up in Newport) he was subject to a certain amount of criticism for being opposed to private schools but educating his own daughters privately. Any ideas for a cite? MissingMia (talk) 12:41, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Louise Brough

message: That's odd. It is stated her that she was a finalist in 1950. But checking the official site and the French Open article in wikipedia, the finalist then was Pat Todd. Joey80 10:18, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: French Open performance

message: Did Louise compete at the US Open of 1958, the same month of her marriage? If so, what was her last round? The performance timeline gives QF. This is in conflict with the page "1958 U.S. National Championships – Women's Singles". Rard 1968 (talk) 18:59, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like a big oops, so I fixed it. Thanks for pointing it out. Fyunck(click) (talk) 21:39, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  US Open 1958
Wikipedia talk:Avoid instruction creep

message: I'm not going to quibble over your working change, but please re-add links to WP:BOLD and WP:FOLLOWBRD into your text. Otherwise, you can revert your changes entirely and discuss. Chris Troutman (talk) 02:48, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Ironically, I thought it might be best not to encourage boldness while editing such pages. But I've made my thoughts clear, so I'll leave it to others what to do from here. Small Jars Lack Gold (talk) 03:00, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  if you think you need to make a change 

message: Oops, hit "Publish" too soo. Here's what I would have said: "Restored text that leaves the focus (as it is in the first sentence) on the reader and what happens when they add instructions." - Butwhatdoiknow (talk) 19:49, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explain edit of April 24
Talk:76th United States Congress

message: All of the others (1st United States Congress through 113th United States Congress) have long since been renamed with the consensus of the Wikipedia community.  I suspect that the renamers found these articles hard to move and gave up.—Markles 10:44, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move

message: Is Henry his middle name?  There is a Henry J. Lesinski, Sr. - defeated in a 1960 Michigan primary, 7th district , but I don't believe it is the same person as John Lesinski, Sr.  Anyone else know? --Appraiser 14:25, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: John Lesinski

message: Information on the change in session scheduling (second session full year instead of adjourning months earlier as historically) should be provided in this article or in the sessions article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.18.251.11 (talk) 15:41, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Session scheduling
Wikipedia talk:Instruction creep

message: Is there a reason Wikipedia:Avoid instruction creep and this page are separate? They contain virtually the same content. Perhaps this page may be a redirect to the other? --Folajimi 10:24, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Better yet, have the other page link to this page? That way, the title of this page along and the destination page on meta will be identical...  --Folajimi 10:27, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Unified process

message: I think the Rational Unified Process article needs to be refactored.  However, before tackling that more ambitious project I decided to create this small "Unified Process" article to try to explain (to the extent that anyone understands them) the differences between RUP and UP.  My intent is not to supplant the RUP article.  I think the RUP article should be the main article describing the process.  More has been written about RUP than about all other "versions" of UP combined.  My intent is that this UP article should explain what is common among all the different "versions" of UP and that it should provide links to the various related articles.
--GFLewis 18:28, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  UP verses RUP 

message: The Unified Process name is also used to avoid potential issues of copyright infringement since Rational Unified Process and RUP are trademarks of IBM.
Should this instead read "patent infringement"? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.193.240.87 (talk) 00:58, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trademark vs copyright 

message: The Iterative Development Diagram on this page (the so-called RUP 'hump chart') uses RUP terminology and is based on the RUP disciplines rather than the UP workflows - this is confusing for the reader because UP and RUP use different terminology and have different numbers of core activities (workflows in UP, disciplines in RUP).
As originally specified in Jacobson's book, which is the definitive reference, UP has 5 core workflows:
* Requirements
* Analysis
* Design
* Implementation
* Test
whereas RUP has 6 disciplines, namely:
* Business modelling
* Requirements
* Analysis and design
* Implementation
* Test
* Deployment
There is a UP version of the RUP 'hump chart' in Jacobson's book (Fig 1.5), which is based on the UP workflows rather than the RUP disciplines,  so I think that WIkipedia needs to have two versions of this diagram, one for UP and one for RUP.
Nrjs (talk) 16:22, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem with Iterative Development diagram 

message: Does elicitation phase belong to UP? It is not referenced in any other place than a single reference to a 3-bullet list with no explanation and context. Should we remove it? Rentzepopoulos (talk) 14:43, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: After reviewing the update history of the article, where there is no support for the inclusion of the elicitation phase, I remove it completely. Rentzepopoulos (talk) 14:47, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elicitation phase? 

message: Explain clearly 61.2.46.42 (talk) 05:15, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Usecase modeling
Talk:33rd United States Congress

message: *This article is COMPLETE and meets the current standard for this series of articles.
*suggestions for future improvements:
#supplemental Senate & House committees article
#supplemental district maps article
#narrative for major legislation
#narrative for major events
stilltim 04:02, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: All of the others (1st United States Congress through 113th United States Congress) have long since been renamed with the consensus of the Wikipedia community.  I suspect that the renamers found these articles hard to move and gave up.—Markles 10:33, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move
Talk:Mining League

message: The English league system page says this league is at level 13, not 14.... ChrisTheDude 10:33, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes 13 would seem correct to me: 1 FA Premier League, 2-4 Football League, 5-6 Conference, 7-8 Southern League, 9-10 Western League, 11 SW League, 12 Cornwall Comb, 13 - Mining League. I'll make the edit. - fchd 11:37, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, my mistake - apologies. Bretonbanquet 19:03, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:52nd United States Congress

message: *This article is COMPLETE and meets the current standard for this series of articles.
*suggestions for future improvements:
#supplemental Senate & House committees article
#supplemental district maps article
#narrative for major legislation
#narrative for major events
stilltim 10:52, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: All of the others (1st United States Congress through 113th United States Congress) have long since been renamed with the consensus of the Wikipedia community.  I suspect that the renamers found these articles hard to move and gave up.—Markles 10:34, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move
Talk:55th United States Congress

message: All of the others (1st United States Congress through 113th United States Congress) have long since been renamed with the consensus of the Wikipedia community.  I suspect that the renamers found these articles hard to move and gave up.—Markles 10:36, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move

message: *This article is COMPLETE and meets the current standard for this series of articles.
*suggestions for future improvements:
#supplemental Senate & House committees article
#supplemental district maps article
#narrative for major legislation
#narrative for major events
stilltim 10:51, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:57th United States Congress

message: All of the others (1st United States Congress through 113th United States Congress) have long since been renamed with the consensus of the Wikipedia community.  I suspect that the renamers found these articles hard to move and gave up.—Markles 10:36, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move
Talk:Friedrich Ludwig (painter)

message: arghAE\RFA[EFBADFB[ZCVPBPADH[AERHQEHRTREH
I cleaned up this article a lot - I assume it was tranlsated from the German article, and since I don't speak German I might have fixed something wrongly.  This still needs help detailing Ludwig's works, adding references, and fixing the quotations. Bellemichelle 19:10, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:70th United States Congress

message: All of the others (1st United States Congress through 113th United States Congress) have long since been renamed with the consensus of the Wikipedia community.  I suspect that the renamers found these articles hard to move and gave up.—Markles 10:42, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move

message: This article states that the senate was still mostly appointed by state legislatures. This had long since past due to the ratification of the 17th amendment. Can someone address this or explain why this article does not mention this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.74.244.45 (talk) 21:57, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Senate 
Talk:75th United States Congress

message: All of the others (1st United States Congress through 113th United States Congress) have long since been renamed with the consensus of the Wikipedia community.  I suspect that the renamers found these articles hard to move and gave up.—Markles 10:44, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move

message: I added the Marihuana Tax Act as a major piece of legislation. - A Canadian Toker (talk) 03:57, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added the Marihuana Tax act
Talk:Worth Abbey

message: I have added some slightly more detailed information and updated the links on this page. Lanspergius 07:47, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

message: This article has numerous errors, deprecated links, lacks citations, etc. I will begin the process of updating, but would appreciate any assistance from those with an interest or time. MonasticScribe (talk) 17:05, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updating the article
Talk:78th United States Congress

message: All of the others (1st United States Congress through 113th United States Congress) have long since been renamed with the consensus of the Wikipedia community.  I suspect that the renamers found these articles hard to move and gave up.—Markles 10:48, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move

message: The mix of ISO 8601 format dates (e.g. 1943-09-08 under Major events section in this article) and American-formatted dates in this article prompted this discussion: Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (dates and numbers)#Proposal to strengthen the watery proscription of year–month–day numerical dates. Dl2000 (talk) 02:08, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: This article involved in a current [[MOS:NUM]] discussion

message: I'm not sure where to put this, I'd correct it myself if I knew the facts (but I don't have a good reference book at hand).
It says  "House Democrats increased their majority with a 20-seat net gain."
Then it says "Democratic (D): 222 (majority)
Republican (R): 209"
However, in the 77th United States Congress it says:
"House of Representatives
267 Democrats
162 Republicans"
As you can see, this should bring a Democratic majority up to 287 if the first statement is true.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.149.119.250 (talk) 19:59, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Net gain? 