lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hakalau, Hawaii

message: I've temporarily moved the following content from the main article until it can be cleaned up and sourced:
:Hakalau school once ranged from kindergaden to the 9th grade.  As the sugar plantation was phased-out, the children from seventh to ninth grades had to relocate to Prince Kohio Kalanianeole School in the town of Paipako, Hawaii about seven miles away. The small town had two churches one Catholic and one Buddhist. At the Buddhist church, they offered Japanese language school, Aikido classes, and Japanese arts and crafts. There were two stores, Moritas store and gas station, and the Fujii store and bakery. The Fujii store and bakery made fresh bread and pasteries daily.  Mr. Fujii also had a traveling van with store items and went through the neighborhoods selling wares from his store to those without transportation to get to the store. Also available was Yoshimura Chevron Garage and filling station. There was a ball park with tennis courts which held baseball games for both little league and pony league for the other towns close to Hakalau.  There are several streams in the area creating swimming hole for the children. With sugar fazed out the town of Hakalau has few residents and no local area stores or churches today.  Every several years the town has a reunion and all the old residents return to reminist old times.  
--Viriditas 12:18, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Content moved
Talk:Hamakua

message: Makes sense to me, just making sure to specify that not all the Hamakua Coast is in the Hamakua district. Awien (talk) 22:39, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge 
Talk:Johannes Liechtenauer

message: A list of links to the web sites of organizations, groups, and schools make sense in some related articles.  However, in this article the list of schools come off as just Link Spam.  If this section remains then the list could grow to include links by every McDojo owner who has taken a workshop on Liechtenhauer's art.  Unless someone can describe how these links add real value to the article I think we should plan on deleting this section.Ranp 23:45, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Modern Schools

message: Much of this article was just lifted off the wiktenauer page. As there is nothing to suggest a free licence on that page, this is questionable already on legal grounds. 
But the wiktenauer page is also not a quotable source, and much of its content is itself questionable to say the least. 
*The suggestion that Liechtenauer may have been active in the 13th century is completely unsubstantiated.   It is not true that the date of MS 3227a is "the only" clue to Liechtenauer's floruit. He taught unarmoured longsword, so he can hardly have lived in the 12th century, can he.  There is no shred of evidence of any kind of unarmoured longsword fighting in the 13th century. Also, if we know anything about Lichtenauer the man, we know that he came up with rhymes like kunst dy dich czyret / vnd in krigen sere hofiret . This is 14th century German, as is frenchified terminology like mutieren or duplieren.  So, there is a lot of internal evidence that Lichtenauer's floruit falls squat into the 14th century. We don't know if he was active in the 1340s, 1350s, 1360s, 1370s or 1380s, but we can be damn sure he wasn't active in the 1280s. It is questionable whether his language may still even classify as Middle High German, because the dates listed above are just on the conventional boundary of the period described by that term.
*Also, the identification of Lichtenau as  "Lichtenau, Mittelfranken" is completely unsubstantiated.  His verses were transmitted orally, so we cannot identify their original provenience by means of dialectal analysis. There are lots of places called "Lichtenau" in Germany, so this is at best idle guesswork. 
*thirdly, the supposition that he may still have been alive in 1389 can be referenced, but it is simply guesswork. I think the idea is forwarded by Hils (1985), or perhaps even earlier, so it is hardly proper to attribute it to Tobler (2010), who apparently references this. The idea is simply that if Lichtenauer had been dead when the text was written, it would have been conventional to add "may God have mercy on his soul" or a similar formula to his name. But it is anyone's guess if this would have been observed in a notebook for personal use and not intended for "publication", as is the case with 3227a. 
So, Lichtenauer's floruit was somewhere in the mid 14th century, give or take 20 years or so, so it is equally possible that he may or may not have been alive in 1389. Nobody knows. 
--dab (𒁳) 10:25, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup, factuality
Talk:Acharya S/Typo in archive

message: "Acharya" Is spelled wrong in the archive above, but I don't know how to fix it so its corrected...  Someone who knows how, oughtta do that :p Windsagio 15:52, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Well *ONE* of them is wrong... the main page and talk are "Acharya", but the archive is "Archaya"...  Its on the npov page.  Windsagio 21:25, 18 October 2005 (UTC)

text: Fixed the typo. Thanks. --Ragib 00:09, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Crewman

message: Star Trek is irrevent to seafaring.  The whole idea implies the unprofessional attitude of this encyclopedia. Has any encyclepedia have a reference to Star Trek under a crew topic? -anon user 17Nov05
*Sorry you feel that way.  It actually says Crewman has been used in science fiction and then gives Star Trek as a reference since the term was used extensively in several productions of the show.  The article Ranks and insignia of Starfleet also links to this article, giving the need for a return link.  I suppose, if the article were more developed, it could be split into two separate, one for the real world term of crewman and then an article for Crewman (science fiction). -Husnock 14:02, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Star Trek?
Talk:Blog award

message: What's this crap?  It's when a blogger achieves recognition for having no life at all? Very pretigious! -- Femmina 13:42, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Yehudi Menuhin

message: Could a source be added for “Guarneri filius Andrea 1703” under “Violins”
Thank you very much 24.64.118.239 (talk) 01:29, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source for Violins 

message: No discography?Dogru144 (talk) 22:09, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: No-one's tried to add one. They're not that common on articles about classical musicians for some reason. If you want to try adding one, feel free; here's the relevant guideline. Graham87 06:46, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Discography

message: ... or has something missing.
'His first public appearance took place as an accompanist Menuhin was five years old at the time'
Accompanying whom, and performing what? 60.242.68.138 (talk) 04:02, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the note; I've removed it as it appears to have been left over from this edit. Graham87 (talk) 19:56, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requires punctuation... 

message: This has been well attested, and admitted by Menuhin himself.  As he matured he realized he could no longer play on instinct.  He was struggling, nervous, out of tune.  He had to relearn how to play the violin, a long and difficult process but ultimately successful.  This is what got him interested in yoga (which the article does mention).68.196.7.190 (talk) 20:52, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Should have a section on his postwar performance struggles
Talk:Nanquan (martial art)

message: Nan Quan and Nanquan are the same topic, with Nan Quan being more commonly used as per Google Test. Shawnc 14:04, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: Nan Quan → Nanquan — Standardise with naming conventions for Nandao and Nangun. This is also the official naming convention as used by IWUF. mh 13:12, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: Add  * Support  or  * Oppose  on a new line followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.
* Support  -- mh 13:13, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: *I've moved it. —Mets501 (talk) 02:53, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: Is :Image:Chinese_wushu.jpg really a move in Nanquan? I can't seem to place it --MarSch 13:16, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Image:Chinese_wushu.jpg is not really representative of Nanquan - looks more like XingYi (?) - pigua (?) should be replaced if possible -  --Ottawakungfu 12:22, 26 Feb 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  picture
Talk:Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq

message: This needs to be fixed, as it is ambiguous (and very poor writing):
> and was far closer to the Iranian model than al-Dawa supporting the control of government by the ulema.
Al Subar 14:43, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Moel Famau

message: Could this self styled "ministryofinformation", which seems to have none of the official status that its name implies, please show some credentials?
The index links have been up for some time now. They were not intended to and have not produced any additional business whatsoever. The guys at Wikipedia are aware of them and if they consider that they should be removed, they will be removed. Anyone else who takes that view should make a formal complaint. Shady, self styled "ministries of information" are, to say the least, undesirable.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Viewfinder (talk • contribs) 16:31, November 17, 2005
--
No especial credentials, and none claimed.  The name's just a name, and irrelevant here.  Remember, anyone can edit wiki pages.
I am the second person to regard the index link as advertising.  The other removed the Moel Famau link too, but I thought it relevant, so let that stand.  What relevance does the overall index have to this specific entry?
Can we have proof that the link is authorised by Wikipedia senior editors, please?
--Ministry 17:06, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Index links

message: Moel Gamelin is near Llangollen - around ten miles away. It is certainly not the parent peak of Moel Famau.  Llywelyn2000 (talk) 03:15, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Parent Peak

message: It straddles the border, so it can't be said to be "in" Denbighshire. I'm thinking of changing this, as the mountain belongs to Flintshire as much as it belongs to Denbighshire.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.42.128.164 (talk) 18:01, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Flintshire and Denbighshire

message: What is the real translation of Moel Famau?? As someone who knows Welsh geographical words i.e. place names but who does not speak the language...it seems to me to be a bit of strange one!
For instance, moel as far as I am aware means a bare hill, or a bald featureless area of high ground. Famau is a diminutive of mother(s), is that a plural or a singular. Amusingly an online translator came up with the name 'bald mothers' which I thought was a hoot.
Anyone care to give some sourced material from whence this mountain got its name? Or how best to translate it??  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.160.72.159 (talk) 10:03, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added details on the names, with references. Troellwr (talk) 19:37, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: If it supposed to be Moel Fama - as supposed by the above assertion that "the modern Welsh pronunciation make clear". Then knowing something about how important it is for the Welsh to assert their national identity by having every road sign - where possible - written bilingually, then how do you explain this: Road sign for Moel "Famau" in Flintshire not "Fama".81.129.200.58 (talk) 19:11, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mountain name??
Talk:Richard Brodie (programmer)

message: Is this article written by its subject?  According to the History, the original author was in fact, Richard Brodie.  If so, is this against the policy of not allowing people to write Wikipedia entries about themselves?
***
No This article is writen by me. I am not Richard Brodie. I think Mr. Brodie meets the qualifications of being notable.
ZaQ 23:40, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Eleuthera

message: The history begins in 1550 without any mention of the origin or geology of the island itself.- Volcanic? Petrified basaltic pizza crusts?
The original population of Taino, or Arawaks, was mostly deported by the Spanish to work in the mines of Hispaniola, where they died out by 1550. The island is believed to have been unoccupied until the first European settlers—puritan pilgrims- arrived in 1648 from Bermuda."  Rfhickey 03:42, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Anote

message: Given the various pages related to the Bahamas Islands, I question whether the information regarding the NAVFAC and military information really belongs there. The facility has been abandoned for decades and plays no part in infrastructure of the island. If anyone else agrees or disagrees, please leave a post. If no one replies in the next 90 days, I would consider removing the section myself and describe the changes as "removed irrelevant content". SurfsUp (talk) 23:20, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Another note
Category talk:Roman Catholic monks

message: What is the idea behind this category, as there are already the specific subcategories of :Category:Members of Christian religious orders? --Pjacobi 16:06, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, for one, this category is more specific, as the Members of Christian relisious orders category would include Anglicans, Eastern Orthodox, Oriential Orthodox, and any other Christian groups that maintain religious orders; I think it would be important to note the denomination of someone known as a religious worker (and :Category:Roman Catholics is getting rather large).  Additionally, the members of religious orders cat would include monks, nuns, friars, sisters, and priests who are members of orders, each of which is a natural division. There exist already :Category:Roman Catholic nuns and :Category:Roman Catholic friars, and this one seems like the "next logical step". Gentgeen 18:16, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Some of these individuals date from relatively early in the Church's history, from before the 1054 split between Rome and Constantinople. Is it really accurate to call them "Roman Catholic", when before 1054 there was only one (at least in theory) "Orthodox" and "Catholic" Church?
:No. It is very inaccurate, and totally anachronistic. To refer to anything from the medieval period as "Roman Catholic" simply makes no sense. Either the title of the category should be changed, or it should be restricted to post-Reformation saints. Timothy Titus Talk To TT 14:51, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: "post-Reformation saints"??? What on earth are you talking about? We have hundreds of "Roman Catholic" categories that span the Reformation, and Great Schism. Johnbod (talk) 15:02, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: No, categories for monks from the pretty different Eastern and Western traditions make most sense, and notes should just be added to the categories explaining the scopes. Try restricting the Orthodox category to post-schism and see how far you get. Johnbod (talk) 15:02, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Calling them Eastern Rite and Western Rite makes sense. Talking about a "Roman Catholic Church" before any such entity existed, does not. At present this category even includes Celtic saints pre-Whitby, who weren't even using a Roman calendar or liturgy. Total nonsense. Talk To TT 16:15, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accuracy of category
Talk:Tujia people

message: "Today there are at most 70 thousand speakers of the Tujia language, all of whom live in the northern part of Xiangxi Tujia and Miao Autonomous Prefecture in north-western Hunan Province." This doesn't agree with the Enshi Tujia and Miao Autonomous Prefecture in Hubei. Is someone just making drastic assumptions?--146.7.86.6 16:23, 17 November 2005 (UTC)

message: Is it a tonal language?  Badagnani 02:43, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, there are four tones with tone contours: 55, 53, 35 and 21. This is the same in both the Northern and Southern dialects. --72.75.55.29 05:00, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Tonal?

message: You might like to consider including some material from the following article (recently noted by http://www.ancientscripts.com):
http://en.epochtimes.com/news/8-2-24/66522.html
I imagine there may be further Chinese-language follow-ups to this, inaccessible to a monoglot round-eyes like myself ;-).87.81.230.195 (talk) 06:37, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sources provided by those extremists are not neutral. Stay away from them! --92.74.64.34 (talk) 20:40, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible Tuija script discovered?
Talk:844

message: A number of steam locomotives in the railfan community are commonly known by their road numbers.  For example, Southern Pacific 4449 is sometimes referred to simply as 4449, and Union Pacific 844 is sometimes referred to as 844.  I'm tempted to add a See also section on this article for the Union Pacific locomotive, but wanted to make sure about its appropriateness for disambiguation before being bold and adding it myself.  Perhaps a disambig style link at the top of the page that looks like ?  Thoughts?  slambo 16:33, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  See also links
Talk:Crucible

message: "Does the protagonist John Procter, solve his inner conflicts in his quest for self discovery?"
:Um, I think you might want The Crucible, not Crucible. Also, DYOH (Do Your Own Homework). —Keenan Pepper
::If by "solve his inner conflicts in his quest for self discovery" they mean saving his wife's life, then the answer is "sort of". I don't know what kind of "self discovery" one searches for during a witchcraft trial... TheRaven7 02:50, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's crew-see-bel Slothie 08:22, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Nice article! A thousand years ago when crucible steel production was taking place in India, possibly elaborate a bit more on the materials used for the unusually high temperature (1,700 degree C) crucibles such as the high alumina clay, and a more precise location where it came from than Asia?
Thanks!
Linstrum (talk) 21:33, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  exactly what were high temperature crucibles made from, for example 1700º C used for crucible steel?
Talk:Battle of Akraba

message: Was Mosailima actually killed in the fighting?  I am not familiar with this battle, and the other Wikipedia articles I attempted to refer to had POV markers on them, so I was hesitant to use that information.  There was no discussion for the Mosailima article, where said assertion was made.  Is Mosailima's death a proven fact, or was that statement also being challenged for an exclusively Sunni POV? Roy Al Blue 16:57, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Chile con queso

message: Seeing that this article apparently references salsa con queso rather than chile con queso, and that "salsa con queso" redirects to CHEEZ WHIZ makes me think that there are a lot of Wikipedia editors deleting articles when they haven't a clue what the articles are about.  Queso fundido is completely different to salsa con queso, and even chile con queso and salsa con queso have some distinctions that would warrant separate articles.
Bottom line... I REALLY doubt that Wikipedia is running out of hard drive space.  Beyond that, these articles are valid and necessary... I'm sure there are lots of unneeded articles here, but I'd really prefer that articles not be deleted just because some editors haven't got out and experienced life, food, etc.  Please make a point to shut off the computer once in a while and emerge from your parents' basement... Wikipedia as a whole will surely benefit.
THAAANKS!!! :) MaxVolume (talk) 02:37, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editors, please leave the house before deleting articles. 

message: I see it used inconsistently within the article. Shouldn't we pick one and stick with it? (This obviously after taking translation into account.)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.127.102.49 (talk) 07:20, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chili or Chile 

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
*Comment I recently moved this page with no prior consensus; I think the name is better and more descriptive at this title. In English, to me, "chili con queso" seems like chili with cheese, while "chile con queso" makes me think of peppers with cheese on them. If there's no consensus, by the way, this page must be moved back to Chile con queso since that was the title before. Red Slash 22:18, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: down in philly, we call this stuff chungus [seriously where do you think the meme comes from] or nightmare sauce and almost never queso or chile con queso. can this be reflected in the article? i tried to edit but it wouldn't let me.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.185.218.21 (talk) 03:53, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, do you have any reliable sources (see WP:RS) for the Philadelphia version and its name? Is "chungus" made with the same ingredients as chile con queso? Everyone knows about "wit whiz" for their cheesesteak, but are there published write-ups for "chungus" or "nightmare sauce" as there are for cheesesteak? Geoff |  Who, me? 16:35, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trying to add regional names
Talk:Comparative responsibility

message: I started this page a few days ago, I'm working on it slowly.  I hope to include more links and references and polish the organization of the page over the next few days. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mendelson (talk • contribs) 
While I agree that this phrasing of the doctrine is much clearer, I can't find any sources that refer to the doctrine as "comparative responsibility." Comparative negligence is the common term in my experience. I've seen discussions referring to the "responsibilities" of the various parties, but they don't go so far as to name the doctrine as such. It seems to me that this article should be merged with Comparative negligence. Also there is a terrible lack of citation here. For example what jurisdictions refer to this as comparative fault? For that matter, who refers to it as comparative responsibility other than in the phrase "the comparative responsibility of the plaintiff?" Rkedge (talk) 19:28, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  comparative responsibility  

message: This page should be taken with a grain of salt and contrasted with others defining the terms used as there is apparent inconsistency. Further, the whole idea of comparing fault between an intentional tortfeasor and a negligent plaintiff creates the very misleading impression that such an extraordinary case arises with some frequency.  A citation to a real case would be helpful. In fact, the frequency of such cases is negligible [pun unintentional] and I think the whole subject is better explained on the page on comparative negligence.  It should be noted I do not have any idea what I'm talking about.
--Yehhbut 16:57, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: ==