lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Attorney General of Ireland

message: I have reverted twice the incorrect title using "Árd" with a fada, as far as I can see using a fada is asolutely incorrect and I have brought this to the attention of Irish wikipedians' notice board also the following email I recieved when I raised the matter with the Office of the Attorney-General:
: I refer to your email of the 18th of October. You are quite correct that the fada appears in error on the banner on our website. This fada does not appear on the headed notepaper of this office, or on the annual report, published by this office.
:Thank you for bringing this error to our attention. The error has now been corrected.
Furthermore the constitution uses the term without a fada and this will take precidence in all cases. Djegan 15:02, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: An Ard-Aighne

message: The link to Paul Gallagher is to a scottish footballer. Unless the new government has made a somewhat more radical appointment this may be incorrect. 
--Kenmare sherpa 20:56, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong Paul Gallagher 

message: Would it make sense to add party colours to the numbers as is done in e.g. Taoiseach#List_of_office_holders? Alekksandr (talk) 21:29, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think it does as I don't think it adds greatly to the article where are ambiguities: there are many AGs who are not members of political parties (e.g. the current AG ("Fanning is not a member of a political party") and there are many whose political background is not easily obtainable. ZL10 (talk) 22:03, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

text: I agree with . While many if not most have been members of parties, and while it is a political appointment, it is not a political office. Even where someone is a member of a party, they're not being appointed  party. For example, Kenny re-appointed Labour member Máire Whelan in 2016; this wasn't as part of a continuing deal or arrangement with the Labour Party, and to add the red colour to her row could suggest otherwise. While party colours are used on Attorney-General for Ireland, these were perhaps much more of a partisan appointment that is the case with our current AG. Iveagh Gardens (talk) 09:57, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Party affiliation
Talk:Juliusz Słowacki

message: huch wrong wikipedia ;) .. please move it back!! ...Sicherlich 15:20, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: With the expanded and properly referenced biography, I think this article classifies for the C-class. My intend is to keep expanding and improving this article. Expect a B-class review from WP:POLAND in the near future, and a GA nom afterward. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  00:59, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I've promoted the article to B Class. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 02:55, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: C-class
Talk:Internet Haganah

message: This article is very weak on citations.  General links to Wikipedia entries for news publications are not citations. --John Nagle (talk) 18:06, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Put in a Washington Post cite and trimmed back the personal bio information to what was available in the press. --John Nagle (talk) 04:46, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs more references 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.wired.com/techbiz/it/news/2003/04/58356?currentPage=1. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Diannaa (talk) 20:57, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:William Spence

message: Adam, I am at a loss to see why you would find it necessary to delete the quote from Bill Shorten about the Eureka Stockade, the quote from Spence himself on the Common Good, or the reference to Spence's collaboration with King O'Malley on the Commonwealth Bank. --Herschelkrustofsky 15:46, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: The masses must not only take a deeper interest in political questions, but they must make the politics of the country. The welfare of the people must be raised to the first place-must be the uppermost and foremost consideration. How best to secure the good of all without injury to any should be the aim- not commercial supremacy, not cheap production regardless of the human misery following, but rather the broadest justice, the widest extension of human happiness, and the attainment of the highest intellectual and moral standard of civilised nations should be our aim....Let each remember that man had failed before because each carelessly left to some other the work of the Common Good. We must reverse that. Each must take his or her share. With unity above all as our watchword, the Common Good our aim, we will soon find common ground of agreement as to the way in which the goal should be reached. The best start we can give to our children is the certainty of better conditions; the sweetest memory of us to them the fact that we did so."
*"In 1898 Spence entered politics himself, becoming MP for Cobar in western New South Wales, and became a key member of King O'Malley's "torpedo brigade", which organised the Labor caucus in Parliament to vote for O'Malley's Commonwealth Bank."
Are you disputing the accuracy of these items, or are you making an ostentatious display of contempt for the Wikipedia NPOV policy?
--Herschelkrustofsky 21:53, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Skellig Michael

message: I have changed the American English Kilometer to the British English Kilometre. As this is not an international topic (where we generally apply the rule of everyone follow the type of english (AE, BE)which the first author used) but refers to a topic in a location in a part of the world where people use BE (or Hiberno-English) it seems logical, as in other British and Irish pages, to use BE and HE rather than AE. FearÉIREANN 15:49, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: 2004 post
Talk:USS Trout (SS-202)

message: Why the heck is this page making my computer play 'Anchors Aweigh,' and how do I make it stop?[[PaulinSaudi 16:13, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article claims (with no cited source) that the Kaidai-class submarine that Trout sunk on its tenth patrol was I-182, but this is contradicted in the article for I-182, which states that it was sunk by the USS Wadsworth on September 1, 1943, days before the September 9 sub-to-sub encounter described in this article. Furthermore, the US Navy's military history website states the following regarding the Trout: "She sank a freighter, a transport, a sampan and for a time was credited with a submarine - I-182, thought to have been destroyed in Surigao Strait on 9 September." In lieu of any direct references specifying the identity of the submarine, I will correct the section, add the Navy reference, and omit the identity of the Japanese submarine. Global Cerebral Ischemia (talk) 01:54, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sinking of I-182
Talk:The Red Shoes (album)

message: Does anybody know who Kate Bush is referring to when she sings:
"On a balcony in New York 
It's just started to snow 
He meets us at the lift 
Like Douglas Fairbanks 
Waving his walking stick 
But he isn't well at all 
The buildings of New York 
Look just like mountains through the snow"
in "moments of pleasure"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by  172.189.128.50  (talk • contribs) 
Michael Powell, director of the movie "The Red Shoes".  I just noticed in the main Kate Bush article, someone wrote it was about Douglas Fairbanks himself (I assume they mean Douglas Fairbanks, Jr., since Senior dies in 1939), but he was "Like Douglas Fairbanks", not Douglas Fairbanks himself. I just fixed that.  Stev0 01:15, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Sheffield United F.C.

message: Could you change Bramall Lane capacity to 32,050. My source is Premier League Handbook 2023/24:(https://resources.premierleague.com/premierleague/document/2023/08/31/132475d9-6ce7-48f3-b168-0d9f234c995a/PL_Handbook_2023-24_DIGITAL_29.08.23.pdf) published by Premier League and the publish date was 21 July 2023 and the file update date was 29 August 2023 and to be honest I can't select the true date 😅. 41.47.78.147 (talk) 18:14, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: . Thanks for the update. Closetside (talk) 22:11, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 4 September 2023 

message: Sheffield Utd were controversially relegated on the last day of the 2006-07 season when West Ham Utd survived fielding two ineligible players Tevez and Masherano for which they were fined a record £5.5 million pounds by the Premier League. Tevez  scored the winning goal against Manchester Utd on the final day thus relegating Sheffield Utd. After relegation Sheffield Utd owner Kevin McCabe sued West Ham and received a £22 million pounds out of court settlement. 2A02:C7C:C04E:7300:8448:11A7:B04D:BDAD (talk) 14:08, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Keith D (talk) 22:59, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 18 November 2023 

message: Under the section Saudi Takeover, there is a grammatical error in the phrase "having reportedly paying a near-£10 million non-refundable deposit", which should be changed to "having reportedly paid a near-£10 million non-refundable deposit" LGuyland (talk) 15:58, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: M.Bitton (talk) 17:31, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 14 May 2024
File talk:Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy - Echocardiogram - Sam.ogg

message: To the best of my knowledge, this is the first video uploaded to the wikipedia.  It is still not clear (to me at least), what the best tags are to link it into a document.  I would preferably like to have it displayed in the user's default media player within the browser window. Ksheka 17:03, Nov 13, 2004 (UTC)
:Nice work! I was unable to play it with VideoLAN 0.8 (supposed to work) without downloading the codec at the provided link, but with the coded it worked just fine.--Dittaeva 12:57, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Down II: A Bustle in Your Hedgerow

message: The first sentence of this article is beyond stupid. I love this band, but I'm going to leave it as-is so future literate people can also laugh really hard at it. 67.184.127.168 (talk) 11:49, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wow 

message: I'm not usually the one to critique reviewers. I don't care much for the opinions of "critics" and the like. But seeing Allmusic giving this album a rating of 2 out of 5. That's absurd. I'd give 2 out of 5 for something I find distressingly horrible, not in the least for something somewhat good. I guess it's ok for people just surfing around to have a second, different opinion on the album. But the rating is so absurd I would think it was accidentally rated that bad and would remove it from the page. This is, at least, a good album. By any means.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.24.64.25 (talk) 21:09, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Reviews
Talk:Chevelle (band)

message: I see absolutely no reason why a band members timeline can't be included. It doesn't hurt to include one. I want to see what others think about this. What Wikipedia guideline states a band member's lineup needs to be super complex for a timeline to be required?  Is there a certain number of lineup changes required? I would agree with you that they don't need a timeline if this band had only one or no lineup changes. But, how are three lineup changes not enough? Tagging other editors:   Bowling is life (talk) 06:49, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I see absolutely no reason why a band members timeline should be included. The prose do a sufficient job of explaining that there were three bass players, when they started and when they left. It's entirely superfluous. The fact that it ends six months from now is another problem. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:51, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: For once I actually side with Walter. I don't know what guideline it is, or if there's a specific number, but from experience I do generally agree that consensus is that it is used for more extensively varied lineups. Personally I don't see three changes, particularly or at least of the same instrument, as warranting a timeline. What I take into consideration when adding a timeline is whether the amount of lineup changes makes the "Band members" section big enough so that it is difficult to track the different changes. I certainly don't think that happens with Chevelle. dannymusiceditor  oops  07:15, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Band memebrs timeline 

message: Is Louder Sound calling La Gárgola progressive metal or saying that it almost is when they say "This prog metal sense sits behind songs written with a real sense of purpose, such as the bruising Jawbreaker."? I tried asking this on La Gárgolas talk page back back in January, but I never got a response. yawaraey (talk) 02:16, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Progressive metal 

message: Not sure if they are Christian, but someone thought they were years ago. https://www.thelantern.com/2004/11/christian-rock-not-just-for-christians-anymore/ Not a source for Wiki, just a whiny college student mad at Switchfoot mostly! YouThinkDotCom (talk) 23:03, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Just a link
Talk:Who Censored Roger Rabbit?

message: :"Valiant's search for the killer takes him to a variety of suspects including Roger's widow, Jessica Rabbit and his former co-star Baby Herman. The book has a surprise ending.
:Another Roger Rabbit book entitled Who P-P-P Plugged Roger Rabbit?: A Hare-Raising Mystery was also written by Wolf. The book was a sequel to the film and not the first book, however, so Roger is still alive in it."
So much for surprise ending. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Crtrue (talk • contribs) 18:34, 13 November 2004
:What are you talking about? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.63.22.39 (talk • contribs) 17:48, 15 February 2005
:It's already stated that the plot of the first book has Eddie Valiant investigating Roger Rabbit's murder, so that sentence has no bearing on the surprise ending. -- Supermorff 21:24, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Erm

message: It says: "Although the book features many of the same characters used in the film, some of their characteristics, as well as the basic plot, are significantly different." Since the `88 Film is based on the novel, shouldn`t the differences between novel and film be explained in the article to the film, not the other way around? Gott 01:55, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Novel - Film 

message: A lot of text was added in this edit. It has a fair number of errors and is probably too long. It seems to have some detail that may be useful, though, which is why I haven't deleted it. --Officiallyover (talk) 12:28, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  The current plot summary
Talk:Gulf Coastal Plain

message: I read this article multiple times and finally realized, this doesn't actually say what the plain is. I know where it is, but is it a flat stretch of land like the Atlantic Coastal Plain? It also only has one source. --75.162.237.173 (talk) 01:26, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explain 

message: The extent of the Gulf Coastal Plain as described in the article doesn't make any sense. SW Arkansas is in the GCP, as is some of western KY and TN, as well as the Florida Parishes of Louisiana. Surely SE Arkansas and almost the entirety of Louisiana must be in the GCP for it to be a contiguous region that includes any part of KY and TN. Plantdrew (talk) 23:01, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Described extent of Gulf Coastal Plain doesn't make any sense
Category talk:Chronology

message: I made :Category:Chroniclers a sub-category to this, but I don't know if there are better places to put it. Please comment. // Rogper 18:41, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Does anyone object to merging this category with :Category:Timelines?  Chronology even says that timeline is another name for chronology.  I think Timelines is the name that should be kept because there are a lot more pages with Timeline in their name than Chronology, but should Chronology be kept as the main article?  --JeffW 18:15, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[:Category:Timelines]] 

message: Please note the sort keys for standard intervals of time, so they occur in order: , , , , , , .  — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 08:06, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sort keys
Talk:Samuel Holland (surveyor)

message: Unless his first name from birth was "Captain", I believe this should be moved to "Samuel Holland". -- Infrogmation 18:43, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: According to BCGNIS, Aimé Laussedat was the "originator of the science of photo-topography." (A.O. Wheeler) [photo-topography is now called photogrammetry - the science of making maps using aerial photographs] " - see this cite - so I'm wondering what the distinction was between the credit given here to Holland, and Laussedat's creation?Skookum1 (talk) 16:12, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Aimé Laussedat

message: The link to Royal Engineers is a different regiment of the British Army than the Royal Americans.  Is he on the Royal Engineers roster or is a different context of that term meant here than its regimental one?  If he was in the RE, then ;Category:Royal Engineers should be added.Skookum1 (talk) 16:12, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Royal Americans vs Royal Engineers

message: ===captain lieutenant...===
The article currently says Holland was promoted to "captain lieutenant".  So, what is a "captain lieutenant"?  Was this really a British rank?  Geo Swan (talk) 17:12, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: If only there was an place where you could easily find the answer to this easily, maybe like a link to an article that explains this?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.100.255.20 (talk) 17:35, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questionable... 

message: The article currently says Holland was promoted to "captain lieutenant".  So, what is a "captain lieutenant"?  Was this really a British rank?  Geo Swan (talk) 17:12, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: If only there was an place where you could easily find the answer to this easily, maybe like a link to an article that explains this?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.100.255.20 (talk) 17:35, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: captain lieutenant...
Talk:PC133

message: Most PC133 memory modules are backward compatible with PC100 and some PC66 systems. Is there a specific reason that not all modules are backward compatible?
:Because near the end of SDRAM production, as DDR took over the market, manufacturers of PC133 quit making it backward compatible with the slower PC100 and PC66 standards. I don't know specific reasons or technical details, but there must have been some extra cost involved with ensuring the modules would work at slower speeds. Or it could have been for no real technical reason at all but an added hack to deliberately make it not work to push sales of motherboards supporting PC133 to clear out inventories of older chipsets. Chipset and RAM manufacturers work very closely with each other to ensure compatibility of new RAM technology. I wouldn't put it past the industry to create an artificial incompatibility to clear their bins of older product. Bizzybody (talk)
::Quality brand manufacturers usually kept PC-100 timing data in SPD EEPROM, some even down to PC-66. The cheap/unbranded modules usually had only PC-133 timings programmed. This should not prevent these modules from running at lower speedgrades though (except motherboard issues due to memory chip density or internal organization). --Denniss (talk) 12:39, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Compatability with PC100 

message: The article says: "PC133 was the fastest and final SDRAM standard ever approved by the JEDEC...". Isn't DDR RAM a type of SDRAM? (Double Data Rate SD RAM).
:DDR is not the same as PC100, it's different voltage and size so we should not compare with them, only comparison between PC68, PC100, PC133 makes any sense.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.49.69.16 (talk) 08:23, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Final SDRAM 

message: Could we resolve the Stub status of PC100, PC133,  PC2700, PC3200, etc by consolidating them into a single article?
MaverickSolutions (talk) 01:46, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resolve Stub Status
Talk:Kazaa

message: I wouldn't recommend this for music lovers. Their selection is very limited and not worth the subscription price. I signed up for their FREE trial and they immediately billed me the full amount within seconds. There is NO free trial.
Christina
Nov. 20,2010  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.169.61.129 (talk) 18:07, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Kazaa

message: In Steal This Film II, Siva Vaidhyanathan says @ 28:30, "Kazaa lost a big case in the United States in the Supreme Court-Kazaa and Grokster and a set of other companies.
So, hose companies no longer operate, but the network still works. In other words the interface is still installed on millions of computers and people still use them."
The article doesn't reflect this. Should it? --Elvey (talk) 22:35, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Still active.
Talk:Theo Albrecht

message: Karl is #3 and Theo #14
:Of what? Jim Michael (talk) 19:40, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Ranking

message: Wheres his photo? Google search easily finds them  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.168.32.65 (talk) 05:07, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo 

message: Following the statement in "Independent" link, both Albrecht Brothers served at the outbreak of WW II in the Wehrmacht (and the war "broke out" (!) in 1939). That means, both brothers volunteered, if that was the case. Because birth year 1920 and 1922, respectively, were not yet regularly drafted at the beginning of the war. So it is quite misleading to use the term "drafted" here. --2001:A61:2B86:9801:183A:FF33:7861:4676 (talk) 18:12, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Drafted'' into Wehrmacht ? 

message: Hi,We live in the N. part of Knoxville Tn.and would love to have a Trader Joe’s in our area. The area is Powell Tn. and we now have the population to support one of your stores.Thank You Very 2601:840:4380:7D10:505F:38A6:6862:D5AC (talk) 20:51, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Looking at new locations