Talk:Ilok

message: This should probably be a disambiguation page.  iLok is also a brand of dongle.  *shivers* —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.165.1.189 (talk • contribs) 03:54, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation

message: Hi PANONIAN!
As far as I know the Újlakis were a branch of the Hédervári clan and they were not Croatian. So Croatians may name them Ilocki, but Újlaki might be better. 84.2.210.61 13:58, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It would be good to find the etymology of this. We already have this issue with several of the "southern" nobility and royalty of the Kingdom of Hungary. --Joy [shallot] 19:28, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No matter of their origin they became Croats later. Lovro Iločki, the son of Nikola, had Croatian (Slavic) name. Also, the official language of the medieval Kingdom of Hungary was not Hungarian, but Latin, thus, if they were Croats their names should be either in Croatian either in Latin. PANONIAN (talk) 10:40, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Ok, I admit that I do not know much about these families, I will see to search for more information about this. However, since this is Croatia-related article, these families should be listed by same names as they were listed in this article: List of rulers of Croatia. PANONIAN (talk) 13:19, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Well, in this case we should change all Zrinksis and Frakopans etc. to Zrínyi and Frangepán when they are mentioned in a Hungary-related article. I think this practice would only cause confusion. I suggest we add to List of rulers of Croatia a sentence: All names appear in Croatian version or something.81.183.151.131 06:48, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think you should first settle this issue in "List of rulers of Croatia" article and then what ever is agreed there, we can use in other articles. By the way, it was only my assumption that Iločki and Gorjanski were Croats because of their Croatian names. It was usual that Slavic names are translated in Hungarian, not Hungarian in Slavic, but if they were Hungarians, it might be an exception from this. PANONIAN (talk) 14:04, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Regarding the source which claim that Lovro Iločki was a duke of Syrmia, it is this book: Friedrich Wilhelm von Taube, Historische und geographische Beschreibung des Königreiches SLAVONIEN und des Herzogthumes SIRMIEN, sowohl nach ihrer natürlichen Beschaffenheit, als auch nach ihrer iBigen Verfassung und neuen Einrichtung in kirlichen, bürgerlichen und militarichen Dingen I, II, III Bücher, Leipzig, 1777, 1778. PANONIAN (talk) 13:19, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I found some other references where he also mention as Duke of Syrmia, though they were all old. Later references never mention this. In fact noble princely title appeared in Hungary only in the 20th century.81.183.151.131 06:48, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  My source say that he took for himself this title, but he was not officially recognized as such, thus it might be a reason why he is not mentioned with this title in other sources. PANONIAN (talk) 13:59, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Újlaki or Iločki 

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 14:20, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem 

message: "The iLok is a USB smart key device that holds licenses for participating software products.", see .--78.53.229.135 (talk) 22:05, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguition with USB smart key device