lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Stars

message: There's a band stars it should be here?
:Um, no, they're at Stars (band). δσώпҹ (talk)(cont) 16:42, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

message: When people type in Stars, many of them don't want to go straight to the Astronomical Star article. So instead, I redirected to Star_(disambiguation) instead. I think it makes more sense. Feel free to add your comments here. --Sideshowmel0329 (talk) 18:46, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Judging by what links here, I think it's better to redirect to Star. Spacepotato (talk) 20:59, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Plural forms should (almost always) redirect to singular, and I don't see a reason for an exception. If you're looking for the band and type "stars", you'll end up at "Star" with a DAB link right at the top. Also, there already is the aforementioned DAB page, a second one just makes things unnecessarily confusing. Retodon8 (talk) 09:18, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Redirect 

message: Someone please delete this page. 67.243.6.204 (talk) 18:57, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually it should redirect to Star as per Wikipedia policy. For some reason people often search for plural forms when they're interested in the singular. Retodon8 (talk) 09:18, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incomplete duplication of [[Star_(disambiguation)]]
Talk:Tröger's base

message: *The reaction mechanism has an error in the last step...
:*Well spotted: image revised... V8rik 23:37, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Errors in reaction 

message: Hi, I am trying to clear a bit the "methylene" nomenclature mess, which seems to mean at least three different things: the free radical molecule  (now covered in methylene, aka unsubstituted carbene), the double-bonded group = (now in methylene group) and the single-bonded bridging -- unit (now in methanediyl).  I am trying to fix the old links to methylene, but cannot tell which one is being referenced in this article. Could someone do that for me?  Thanks... --Jorge Stolfi (talk) 01:55, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Please disambiguate "methylene"
Talk:STS-35

message: Not being a registered user, I can not upload a file.  However, the mission insignia is located here208.137.139.5 16:51, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Mission Insignia

message: During this mission, Mission Control had a visit by Secretary Baker and Eduard Shevardnadze. Should this not be recorded on the page? -- RND  T  C  22:33, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Visit and discussion between crew and Eduard Shevardnadze
Talk:Belknap Mountain

message: User (now registered as NHguardian, previously referred to as Anonymous user (IPs 47.234.0.59 and 71.181.51.206)) continues to remove external link. No other contributors to this article have objected to inclusion of link, which provides relevant hiking data and photos.  Jrclark (talk) 00:34, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Miami Fusion

message: Talk:New York Red Bulls#conference champions
just adding a link to a centralized discussion on division champions conventions. Please post comments there.
Nlsanand (talk) 04:11, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  conference champs 

message: Though the article is extremely well written and focuses on a lot of the appropriate aspects of Miami Fusion's history, it would be interesting to hear more about the season when they won the Supporters' Shield. It is extremely impressive that they had the best regular season record in the MLS for a year, given that the club only existed for 4 years. Would love to hear more about that one season. Arvidsson.d (talk) 17:11, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  More Information Regarding Miami Fusion's Successes  
Talk:Linus the Lionhearted

message: I think there's a long-running misunderstanding about the production of this show. Animation historian Jerry Beck has said in at least one place (see the comments) that Linus the Lionhearted was produced in full color, not "colorized" after production. 
::"The Linus The Lionhearted show WAS produced in color. There were several reasons black and white 16mm negs (and prints) were made – won’t go into that explanation here – but the show was broadcast off 35mm Color prints at the time, even though black and white television was still predominant in the mid 1960s."
In another comment he adds that even if cartoons were still airing in black-and-white on some US networks, the last American cartoon series produced in b&w was probably Tom Terrific in 1957-59.
I'm throwing this out on the talk page because I don't know if a message in a comment thread would satisfy the "citation needed" requirements, but this feels like one of those things that needs work. Enwilson (talk) 14:13, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Colorized"?
Talk:Emigdio Preciado Jr.

message: has been nominated for deletion.  As this template is transcluded here, contributors to the "Emigdio Preciado, Jr." article may want comment in the discussion here.  I propose that if the template is deleted, then most transclusions would be changed to . -- Mark Chovain 01:29, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox FBI Ten Most Wanted TfD
Talk:École Normale Hébraïque

message: It would be good to have a ref to a source that this exists. Currently, both the Haaretzdaily and the AUI links are dead (moreover, the former looks like a highly POV source). I could not find any.
Moreover, "muslims are not currently admitted" sounds quite extraordinary to me, and I will accordingly tag it. TigraanClick here to contact me 11:43, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  references?
Talk:Mysophilia

message: I've cut the reference to omorashi. Omorashi may be indirectly related to mysophilia, as it concerns a "dirty" bodily fluid, but it's much more closely related to urolagnia and the tension of trying to control a bodily function. --Mightyfastpig 17:01, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sleigh bed

message: :"It is proposed that this article be deleted because of the following concern: Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Article created for the purpose of spamming."
This article doesn't look like a dictionary definition to me.  Looking at the contribs of the creator of this article, I'm not seeing a pattern of commercial spamlinking, but more likely a newbie who linked poor references.  Some of the links were commercial, some weren't.  I think there's a case for good faith here.
Anyway, the article is quite short, and probably won't be expanded any time soon.  It seems like a candidate for merging to the broader article Bed.  That article contains a lengthy "list of types of beds", though, and seems to assume each type has a separate article.  I'll put the question to the talk page there.  Matt Fitzpatrick 17:36, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Objection to deletion, merge?
Template talk:Brighton Main Line

message: Can anyone explain to me why the two railway tunnels north of Merstham are referred to as 'Hooton Tunnels' on the template? I can't find reference to this name in any reference book, gazetteer, or on the web, and as far as I recall they were always referred to as the 'Merstham tunnels'. Das48 (talk) 21:28, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

message: Can someone with more template editing experience than me please add Hove Tunnel on the section between Hove Junction and Brighton? I know it's on the West Coastway line, but the section east of Hove Junction is shown in full so the tunnel should appear there too, just like Cliftonville Tunnel. Thank you in advance. 2A00:23C5:D00C:ED00:559C:D3D:A92E:13F9 (talk) 14:44, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hove Tunnel missing
Talk:Hazard (song)

message: Hazard was released at the same time as the TV series Twin Peaks was aired. The song seems was obviously inspired by the TV series, for example, the small northern town, the murder, the suspect was a misunderstood loner, etc. Shouldn't this be mentioned? abelson (talk) 12:20, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Twin Peaks 

message: This article seems like a candidate. Decoratrix 17:45, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a poor article but the song is notable under Wikipedia:Notability (songs), by its chart positions, and is one of his most famous songs. Rigadoun  (talk) 17:37, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Candidate for deletion

message: What is the point of having a disambiguation page for this song?  There are no cited sources; the song is pretty much self explanatory and is indeed fiction.  This should be a candidate for deletion. Here is a link to some information on the song itself.  --Candy156sweet 22:21, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation

message: The article seems to conatin very much speculation and original research (see WP:NOR). Shouldn't we take out the speculations about the murder? 
--J-Star (talk) 11:52, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speculation and Original Research 

message: The article states that there were three videos filmed and aired, but I have never been able to find more than two, and several youtube users suggest that the third one was never finished/aired. ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2-tkwtOyRSk&feature=related )  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.20.116.193 (talk) 07:20, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I remember than MTV Europe aired once all 3 videos in their show called "3 in 1" (i think this show ran weekdays from 5:45pm-6:00pm). But i missed to turn on the tv that day in time, so i missed them :/ Because of that i did several times a search for all of them, but did not succeed till now. --79.206.207.42 (talk) 23:22, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Number of Videos

message: This article is terribly muddled between the 'narrator' of the song's story and Marx himself.  In reality, surely there is no suggestion that the song is actually autobiographical.  In which case many of the references to Marx should be changed to 'the narrator' or something similar. Peteinterpol (talk) 09:48, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion between 'narrator' and Marx 

message: Did it peak at no 9 or no 56 in the Billboard Hot 100?  Both figures are given at different points in the article.  The supporting link for the second reference appears to go to a private individual's website that may not be reliable.  Peteinterpol (talk) 16:29, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Billboard chart position
Talk:Danny Lawson

message: I thought I should mention this regarding Mr. Lawson's death. In extending this article I noted that on the website hockey-reference.com it indicated he had passed away in September of 2008. (see: http://www.hockey-reference.com/teams/MNS/1971.html) However, I was unable to find any other reference to his death on any of the usual hockey websites. Not a single one!! However, by finally searching "danny lawson died" in google I found an obituary from the Calgary Sun. Unfortunately, if you simply click the main link, that link is no longer available. However, if you click the cached pages you will find the article. I'm mentioning this in case anyone is questions how I verified his passing. Here is some of the obituary itself: 
>>LAWSON, Danny (Danny Boy) October 30, 1947 - September 15, 2008.
Just shy of his 61st birthday Danny Lawson died peacefully after an arduous, courageous, and heroic battle with cancer. His family, friends and fans celebrate his life and career with many fond memories; his loss is felt deeply. Danny was predeceased by his parents. 
A "Celebration of Danny's life," will be held for family and friends on October 5, 2008 from 1- 4pm at (deleted). The family wishes to thank both the staff on (deleted) for their dedication and caring and the staff of the (deleted) for their love, consideration, concern and compassion, not only towards Danny during his final days, but also the family. Danny was a true sportsman with a strong competitive edge but unfortunately did not win this one. In 1973 with the Philadelphia Blazers he broke all records becoming the first player to achieve the 50 goal mark in the WHA and earned the title 'Oh Danny Boy'. 
Just One More Time Danny Boy…. 
…and Lawson steals the puck again, fakes a shot right, turns to his left, he shoots…HE SCORES!! Number 11 has done it again! He's got the hat-trick. Calgary leads 3 to zip on a goal from Danny Lawson - Goal, un-assisted, Time of goal - 18:20 of the second period. 
Man this guy never quits, he is SENSATIONAL! 
NO HE DIDN'T and YES HE WAS!! 
Thanks for the memories Danny<<  —Preceding unsigned comment added by BashBrannigan (talk • contribs) 22:43, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've upgraded this from a stub. I wondered about whether if might be upgraded to more than that, but I thought I'd leave that to an impartial, or more experienced eye. I'm doubtful about how much more information about this individual is readily available.BashBrannigan (talk) 06:32, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:Minnesota Timberwolves all-time roster

message: I think we should probably have nationality represent the national team the player plays for rather than where the player is born as is done in the soccer wikiprokect.  Since Towns plays for the Dominican Republic, this would clarify that. matt91486 (talk) 03:00, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nationality 
Talk:Toronto Raptors all-time roster

message: Back in 2005, I was the first one who created a page on Wikipedia devoted to listing the all-time roster for this team.  Somewhere along the way, someone created the "Toronto Raptors all-time roster" page for the exact same purpose.  Rather than using the move tab on the top of the screen to move "List of Toronto Raptors players" to "Toronto Raptors all-time roster", the creator of this page merely changed the page I created into a re-direct to his instead.  In the process, the complete edit history of this page has been cutoff.  If there is any Wikipedian who is able to merge the edit history of both articles into one, it would be greatly appreciated. Amchow78 (talk) 19:40, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I only ran into this request now.  I've merged as requested.  In the future, you can use  to request a merge. Cheers.—Bagumba (talk) 18:37, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: "List of Toronto Raptors players" & edit history

message: You are invited to  join a discussion related to the presentation of nationality in this article at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_National_Basketball_Association#Standard_for_listing_british_nationalities.—Bagumba (talk) 18:06, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nationality issue 

message: The colours chosen for current players, All-stars and active All-stars are really bold - enough to make some of the text hard to read.  Blue links on blue/purple are bad, and I can barely read Marc Gasol, Kawhi Leonard and Kyle Lowry's names.  Whoever's involved in maintaining this list - please pick softer colours for your readers' sake.  Thanks, PKT(alk) 23:43, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colour selection
Talk:Charlotte Hornets all-time roster

message: For interested parties who want to double check the rosters, basketball reference shows historical rosters, ESPN will show the current roster and box scores, and the Charlotte Bobcats website shows has historical box scores updated so someone can go game by game and see which players participated when if they are so inclined. matt91486 17:06, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Portal talk:Journalism

message: WikiProject Portals is back!
The project was rebooted and completely overhauled on April 17th, 2018. Its goals are to revitalize the entire portal system, make building and maintaining portals easier, support the ongoing improvement of portals and the editors dedicated to this, and design the portals of the future.
As of May 2nd, 2018, membership is at 60 editors, and growing. You are welcome to join us.
There are design initiatives for revitalizing the portals system as a whole, and for improving each component of portals.  So far, 2 new dynamic components have been developed: Template:Transclude lead excerpt and Template:Transclude random excerpt.
Tools are provided for building and maintaining portals, including automated portals that update themselves in various ways.
And, if you are bored and would like something to occupy your mind, we have a wonderful task list.
From your friendly neighborhood Portals WikiProject. Hope to see you there. Sincerely,      — The Transhumanist    07:34, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notice from the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Portals|Portals WikiProject]] 

message: Below are content selection guidelines for this portal. North America1000 02:23, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Conetent selection criteria
Talk:U-verse TV

message: DaveBurstein (talk) 07:46, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

message: I want Network to be available anytime I want it in my Android phone 37.44.212.145 (talk) 08:46, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Network
Talk:Manchester Road Race

message: Correct Ben Flanagan’s winning time in the 2021 race. 2601:183:8582:3B0:CD0B:59E1:935A:994 (talk) 15:16, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  According to the November 26, 2021, edition of the 𝙃𝙖𝙧𝙩𝙛𝙤𝙧𝙙 𝘾𝙤𝙪𝙧𝙖𝙣𝙩, ‘21 men’s winner finished the race in 21:23, five seconds off the course record, not 21:33 as recorded here. 

message: Allow me to correct my own mistake: Flanagan’s winning time was 𝘴𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘯 seconds off Edward Cheserek’s course record set in 2018, not five seconds. 2601:183:8582:3B0:CD0B:59E1:935A:994 (talk) 15:26, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correcting 2021 Winning Men’s Time
Talk:Council of Fashion Designers of America

message: The tag is right - this reads like an ad.  I'm working to remove some of the more gratuitous & excessive language.  JohnInDC (talk) 12:17, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Promotional tone 

message: An editor added a list of one or two score of past nominees and winners of one of the awards bestowed by the subject organization.  I removed the list with the edit summary of, "just a list of names".  The editor has restored the list, noting that it was sourced, and wondered why it should not be included.  I was going to remove it, but instead have revised it as set forth below.  Here are the reasons for removing it, and now revising it.  First the unedited comprehensive tally is merely a lengthy, undifferentiated, poorly formatted list of names.  Nothing more - just names (inexplicably repeated in most cases).  Lists are a disfavored form presentation - prose is better, and this long list can't be converted to prose.  Second, most of the names are of non-notable persons, and their inclusion is trivial.  Third, Wikipedia is not a glossary, a compendium of stray information or a mirror site - this information may be publicly available and sourced, but that doesn't mean that including it adds to the article in any meaningful way.  A reader who really wants to know the nominees and winners were of this prize can go to the CFDA website and read it for themselves - the list does not need to be mirrored here, and indeed repeating it is mere clutter.
A suitable list is, "Notable prior winners and nominees".  That list is appropriately short (I count maybe 5-6 people), easy to format as a bulleted list, and - by reason of the fact that it names notable winners, is defensible as worthy of inclusion.  I've made this edit (actually being a bit expansive and including names associated with what I take to be notable firms) and ask that it remain as such, for the reasons I've laid out above, at least until a different consensus emerges.  Thanks.  JohnInDC (talk) 18:23, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undifferentiated run-on list of non-notable prior winners
Talk:Civic journalism

message: I plan on improving this article and adding to it. I believe that civic journalism is a great idea, and integrating journalism into the democratic process would help inform voters and make them more aware of what is occurring in the political sphere. Including this, it could make a difference in the democratic process if all voters were equally informed. However, I believe an important aspect is ensuring that the information received by the public is all accurate and fact-checked. This is an important aspect that sometimes gives journalism, and certain news sources, a bad reputation. I hope to increase awareness on how accuracy in political news and journalism can enable voters to be more involved in the democratic process.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ishangill10 (talk • contribs) 06:27, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plans
Talk:1989 Belgium MiG-23 crash

message: Some Engish-language sources give pilot's name as Skurigin. But in all Soviet/Russian sources he appears as Skuridin. Creo11 (talk) 07:59, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Skurigin or Skuridin

message: The name of the victim was Wim De Laere.
See also http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bellegem  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.240.40.213 (talk) 11:47, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Victim 

message: I see there has been a back-and-forth on this, so rather than just pull it again, I'll ask why is this image being retained?
Its very nature (of passing itself off as a real photo with its curious foreground clutter) is deceptive.   DulcetTone (talk) 19:45, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: In what way is it deceptive or confusing? - The Bushranger One ping only 21:02, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Lose the Rendering

message: The article describes a series of events where a “routine training flight” suffered an engine problem, the sole crewmember ejected from the aircraft, and the aircraft continued to fly until it ran out of fuel and crashed.
This was clearly an accident.
That the aircraft crossed international boundaries between Cold War adversaries made it a diplomatic incident, for which the article is a member of :Category:Diplomatic incidents.  But recently an IP editor, using multiple IP addresses, has repeatedly added :Category:Combat incidents, which seems manifestly incorrect.  The flight was never a combat mission, no enemy was engaged, and no weapons were used.  In fact, when the unresponsive aircraft was intercepted to investigate, US and Soviet aircraft flew together with no hostile action taken by either side.  One of the sources, cited in the article, notes that the built-in cannon of the MiG-23 was not even armed for this training flight.  This was definitely not a “combat incident”.
I'm not interested in an edit war, but if there are no objections, I'm going to remove that inappropriate category (again).
 Unician ∇  05:23, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd already been thinking the same. Andy Dingley (talk) 09:02, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  The silent anonymous editor has again added the same inappropriate category, from yet another IP address, and it has again been removed.  Would whoever is making that change please discuss it here, on its merits, rather than edit-warring?   Unician ∇  08:49, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Combat