Talk:Branning family

message: I just saw that there was no Jack Branning or Oscar Branning on the tree.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dancingcyberman (talk • contribs) 11:44, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I have to get around to updating that one as well. anemone│projectors 15:24, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Oscar or Jack 

message: Storylines are needed for the time between the start of Max and Stacey's affair and the return of Carol, including everything to do with Jack, and the return of Bianca. Events after Carol's return and before the affair are included, but nothing in between. anemoneprojectors talk 15:24, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Storyline update 

message: * Richard Mitchell needs added to the tree
* Could Jim's Grandfather be included and his desendants, Gordon Branning and Jim's father (even though they were not seen on the show, the Mitchell family tree includes its ancestors so its only fair that the Branning family should have their ancestors included)
* Why is Whitney Dean not included in an adoptive branch of the tree, stemming from Bianca.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.130.166.243 (talk) 22:39, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I presume you are talking about the tree image. I will add Richard and also Whitney, but I'm not going to add James Branning. The Mitchell tree has other decendants in it because they link to Billy and Jamie on another branch. I could add Gordon but I don't really see the point. Plus I'd have to add two people without names. AnemoneProjectors 23:02, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I have also added Max and Tanya's divorce as that was missed. AnemoneProjectors 23:17, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Family Update 

message: * Dereck's divorce to an Unknown woman is not highlighted in the family tree, (Suzy's unmknown relationship has been included, so its only fair that Dereck's marriage/divorce should be included) 
* Robbie's marriage to Nita Mistry has not been included. 
Future edits will include;
*the death of billie jackson and the arrival of ronnie and jacks baby  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.168.57.60 (talk) 00:52, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No need to remind me about future events. I will do them when they happen. If they happen. I will do the other edits later. AnemoneProjectors 01:58, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Family Update 2 

message: How ye doin ther darling?? u havent added in aul billie jackson death.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.149.59.146 (talk) 20:43, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for your suggestion. When you believe an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes.  Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the  link at the top. The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills.  New contributors are always welcome. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to). AnemoneProjectors 20:46, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually it does say "In October 2010 Billie Jackson died due to an alcohol related incident leaving the whole branning family devastated by his sudden death." AnemoneProjectors 20:47, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Family Update 3 

message: Just want to ask when was Debs mentioned? Im not saying she wasnt just want to know as she wasnt mentioned during the wedding (Tanya & Greg's) and Cora said, 'it was me and my two girls which lived in a counicl estate'. Any thoughts? MayhemMario (talk) 18:32, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Re first comment: No idea, I'm sure she was mentioned at some point, but as we know, the writers forget these minor details. Re second comment: Rainie, Cora, Debs and Greg don't belong here because it's the Branning family, not the Cross family. Tanya's only there through marriage to Max. She's not decended from James William Branning. –AnemoneProjectors– 21:16, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Cora said she has only two children. So no Debs. –AnemoneProjectors– 13:58, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Cora may have two children, but what about her husband? Debs could be a half-sister. ;) Or she could be Tanya's aunt, since she calls her "Aunty Debs" in this clip - . - JuneGloom  Talk 16:11, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: They didn't mention her once either when Tanya was on about killing her dad, they would have said something then for sure. She could just be a close family friend who Tanya calls aunty.RaintheOne BAM 16:18, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately I can't get sound on these computers :( I think we should remove Debs since Cora only has one child and we can't really assume. If she did exist, she's been erased from history. Probably is Tanya's aunt though. Not notable then. –AnemoneProjectors– 14:20, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Debs? 

message: *EastEnders: can the Brannings match up to the Square's finest families?RaintheOne BAM 11:54, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: I would like to ask the anonymous editor how s/he knows this. –AnemoneProjectors– 14:39, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Kevin and Rebecca's father was called Ken" 

message: I've just updated the family tree, but had to start from scratch, so if there are any errors, please let me know (post them here). –AnemoneProjectors– 14:43, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Kevin and Rebecca's father was called Ken and also someone has forgot that Robbie Jackson married Nita and have an unknown baby.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.173.159.140 (talk) 00:35, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, I was sent a notice on my talk page about this as well by another user. –AnemoneProjectors– 13:46, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Per Wikipedia guidelines for writing about fiction, family trees such as this represent undue weight, coming across as fancruft, putting off casual readers.  Such trees also represent original research, having no reliable sources cited.  The font size alone made it illegible.  I spoke about this before removing this one and the Mitchell family's tree some four months ago on that talk page. Please discuss here or there before reverting. ZarhanFastfire (talk) 07:11, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. I'd put the trees back because I was asked to update them and restore them, but have been off-Wiki for about 6 months. But I do think the text versions of the trees are better. The images still exist on Commons, though. –AnemoneProjectors– 08:52, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Family tree