Talk:Convoy PQ 16

message: This page seems a bit odd; it doesn't read like the other convoy battle pages. </br>
I think I'll be bold and have a go at re-vamping it. Xyl 54 (talk) 22:55, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, done. Xyl 54 (talk) 22:15, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  re-write? 

message: It's really baffling why Alexander Werth's first hand account (The year of Stalingrad) didn't find any space in the current article. 00:47, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't know it. But it looks like a general work on the Soviet Union's war as a whole; what can it add to an article about a specific operation (and a mainly British one at that)? Xyl 54 (talk) 03:27, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  First hand account 

message: I added this as a separate section "In popular literature." To answer the earlier question, quite a big portion of the book is devoted to the journey via the PQ-16 convoy -- the air attacks, the response, the losses, the convoy's arrival at Murmansk. That section really showed the reality of the convoys and was a huge page turner. Highly recommended to anyone interested in the Arctic convoys. --K.e.coffman (talk) 05:09, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Year of Stalingrad by Alexander Werth 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Convoy PQ 16. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101121040523/http://convoyweb.org.uk/russian/convoy1.php?convoy=PQ.16 to http://www.convoyweb.org.uk/russian/convoy1.php?convoy=PQ.16
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:05, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Convoy PQ 16. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140714213350/http://www.jcs-group.com/military/war1941sea/battle.html to http://www.jcs-group.com/military/war1941sea/battle.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:22, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: A recent edit removed 
|coordinates =  
on the basis that the coordinates are supposed to identify the location of the article subject, but the convoy clearly was not at the North Pole. Yet the permalink with the map shows that it works well. Any suggestions on what to do? I would apply WP:IAR and restore the coordinates although they are incorrect, and indeed no point can be correct for a convoy. Otherwise, the script error needs to be fixed. Johnuniq (talk) 02:00, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I suspect that this an issue is because the meta:WikiMiniAtlas uses OpenStreetmap, which in turn uses the Web Mercator projection. The Web Mercator projection does not work about ~85.1°, so the dot is shown at the closest point on the map. I haven't looked at all the code, so I could be mistaken.  — BillHPike (talk, contribs) 02:27, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

text: I've only just noticed that the coords for the Arctic Ocean article are for the NP.... What would be better, the Norwegian or Bering Barents seas? Keith-264 (talk) 18:04, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinates 

message: Thanks very much for the scrutiny and amendments. I can't remember how many of the mistakes are mine but the reponsibility for them belongs to me. When I get a minute (I do six shifts this week) I will consult Rohwer and Hummelchen for ship details. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 19:15, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: PS Graeme can you cite your efns pls? Regards Keith-264 (talk) 19:44, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I hadn't realised how unwritten the article was when I asked for help, looks like I'll have to get busy. Keith-264 (talk) 11:52, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

text: Actually, the unit we are looking for is Aufkl. Gr. 1.(F)/124, subordinated to Luftflotte 5 and based at Kirkenes (page 154). Cheers MisterBee1966 (talk) 20:46, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: 10./ZG 5 probably refers to the 10.(Z)/JG 5. JG 5 had a Zerstörerstaffel, which was later renamed to 13.(Z)/JG 5 in June 1942. MisterBee1966 (talk) 05:18, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

text:  I will check  It may say something about operations against Convoy PQ 16. MisterBee1966 (talk) 05:27, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

text: Please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history/Archive 120#Italicisation of the German words "Luftwaffe" and "Waffen", in essence "Luftwaffe" is in Merriam-Webster Online, see . Therefore, Luftwaffe should not be in italics. MisterBee1966 (talk) 13:11, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: OK Keith-264 (talk) 13:58, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edits 

message: , I believe you once told me that the word Luftwaffe is no longer a loanword and should not be in italics (MOS:FOREIGNITALIC). Did I understand this correctly? Cheers MisterBee1966 (talk) 05:10, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history/Archive 120#Italicisation of the German words "Luftwaffe" and "Waffen", in essence "Luftwaffe" is in Merriam-Webster Online, see . Therefore, Luftwaffe should not be in italics. MisterBee1966 (talk) 13:11, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: OK Keith-264 (talk) 13:58, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Luftwaffe or ''Luftwaffe''

message: Well, I now know a lot more about Luftwaffe organisation but the convoy cargo needs more coverage. Not until after the convoy has reached its destination do we get a partial breakdown of what it carried.
I think it would be helpful for the reader to have more idea of the cargo contents which then ties into the overall picture of the importance of the supplies to the USSR. GraemeLeggett (talk) 19:14, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Quite agree, I'm a bit busy though as me wife went into hospital today a bit sudden. I decided to mine Claasen and do Woodman and DRZW later. There's plenty to add to the Convoy section. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 19:46, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'm thinking forwards to using the general stuff in the background in other articles, hence the pedantic attention to detail. ;O) Keith-264 (talk) 19:48, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

text:  Hope everything resolves OK. GraemeLeggett (talk) 21:05, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, she's just texted that she will be coming home soon. Keith-264 (talk) 21:32, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Background getting quite extensive but.. 

message: I've made a start on the voyage and have a lot to do so I'd appreciate it if other editors let it lie for a day or two until I have the narrative done. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 13:43, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Nearly finished, just need QP 12 entries, the heavy lift ships and clarifications in the Analysis then finish the lead. Keith-264 (talk) 09:30, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Ordered the surgeon, Ransome's memoirs, hope to glean lots for the article. Keith-264 (talk) 21:18, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Action