Talk:Phillip Wilcher

message: This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 16:30, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating

message: I removed the Composer banner (used for 'classical' composers), but now it's back. Can we have some information to establish him a notable composer? Thanks. --Kleinzach 10:29, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: OK. I've removed it. Thanks. --Kleinzach 03:09, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable classical composer?

message: Hay keep an eye on  User124.183.90.78‎ he is trying to add stuff to the article   Jena   (talk) 00:29, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: VANDLE

message: Wilcher wants to get rid of the name "the fifth Wiggle", and it seems he is not known as that anyway, so I have removed the phrase from the article. Maproom (talk) 10:53, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Maproom, that's fine, but the article you cite states that Wilcher has been called "the fifth Wiggle", so we should state that's what he's known for, despite his feelings about it.  I went ahead and added his feelings, since the article is clear about that.  Someone (most likely me) needs to improve this article, anyway.  It shouldn't take very long, but it will be a little while until I get around to it. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 22:48, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The article I cite states "Phillip Wilcher wants to get rid of the tag "Fifth Wiggle" for good". But it provides no evidence that he ever was so known; and I have been unable to find any. A Google search for "fifth Wiggle" finds that article, and the Wikipedia article, but nothing else associated with Philip Wilcher. So I think it's better not to mention it in the article. Maproom (talk) 11:03, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

text: I have responded to Mr. Wilcher's request that his bio be improved with more reliable and accurate sources; see my talk page here .  As I state there, it's my intention to address his concerns and work on this article in the next week or so. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 19:58, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

text: , I'd just let this go if I were you.  Please don't delete this discussion; it's against policy to remove content from talk pages, mostly so that others can see it in case the subject comes up again.  BTW, it is possible for someone to be someone's godfather, even if he's older.  Welcher could be an adult convert to Catholicism, and might have been baptized when he was older, and Anthony could have agreed to stand up for him.  At any rate, Merry Christmas! Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 17:01, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fifth Wiggle 

message: Hello I requested that this page be deleted Because Phillip Wilcher is not a Famous or noteworthy Person also  Wilcher Basically wrote the article himself with the help of User talk:Figureskatingfan I did not think you could do that to an article about yourself I would Like an Admin to look at this please Thank you
:Writing about yourself (WP:AUTO) is strongly discouraged - not banned, partly I suspect that it would be impossible to police to that degree. The PROD was rejected by another editor - suggest you use WP:AfD if you think it should go to get a full discussion on the article's merits.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:17, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: As much as I sympathesize with the sentiments expressed here (Hi Jena!), I agree with the PROD decision--that although the subject of this article is borderline notable, he's notable enough.  Wilcher has made another request that I edit his article, but I've been busy with RL concerns and with what I think are more important tasks here, and I've let it slide.  I will get to it eventually.  I do resent my part in the improvement of this article, but I think that all articles on WP should be improved, regardless of our personal feelings.  I'm committed to ensuring that all articles about The Wiggles are high-quality, well-researched, and well-written.  I've fallen short of that goal in many ways, but I think that I've come far in accomplishing it.  BTW, this isn't the first time folks have asked me to edit, usually folks who don't have the time or ability to learn how.  I find them very helpful; they usually provide me with sources, which is really all the Wilcher has done.  I think that's better than the subject editing his own article, which, as Ronhjones reminds us, isn't encouraged.  I and others have educated Wilcher about that, and to his credit, he's complied. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 21:45, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I removed the PROD because he's borderline notable, but there's enough good-quality verifiable third-party references both to write the article and, importantly, that someone might actually come to Wikipedia to look him up - and the stats bear that out - there's plenty of clearly notable topics that don't get a consistent 100-200 views a day - David Gerard (talk) 22:21, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question for administrator 

message: I was thinking we could use the Grandsen Family Web Page to include info on Wilcher's ancestry. His mother is included on the site. (EditorE (talk) 23:29, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure that it's a reliable source, so probably not. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 03:43, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Ancestry

message: The reverts really need to stop. Edits claim that my contributions to this article are vandalism and have unsourced info, while that's really not true. I would like to have a more clear explanation on why my edits were reverted, because what worries me is that an edit war will occur. So please, keep the article stable. EditorE (talk) 11:43, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  About these reverts 

message: is the Only Reason Wilcher Has an Article is because he was in the Wiggles for a Few Months? I do not think that is Reason Enough  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:5B0:221A:F6C8:C140:6BBF:F9D5:E0EB (talk) 14:51, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: No, as the article states, Wilcher was involved in the early stages of the group's development, wrote a few of their first songs, and appeared on their first album.  Obviously he's notable enough for his article to have passed to a GA. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 18:22, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not Notable