lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Bombaiyer Bombete (film)

message: :Image:24felu.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 22:36, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:24felu.jpg
Talk:Pratidwandi

message: Godard was the first to use photonegative flashbacks and x-ray vision shots, not Ray, which this article misleadingly, incorrectly claims to have 'pioneered'...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.182.170.30 (talk) 09:57, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Godard and Ray
Talk:Cablinasian

message: — JIP | Talk 08:50, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not legit. I've tryed editing it but you keep reverting me. --Khoikhoi 04:32, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

text: I guess there is no harm in letting this article stay, even if it was not come into use, some one might wanna know what this terms means and wikipedia should have it in it's db --digitalSurgeon 09:27, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

message: OK, this article is pretty silly overall, but I just couldn't resist adding the Census data to give it a little bit of a grounding.--Pharos 06:13, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not necessarily an endorsement... 

message: I think it was clear that when Tiger Woods coined this term, he was joking about what a unique mix of ancestry he has.  In other words, he coined the term specifically because this particular ethnic mix is not notable, at least not in an encyclopedic sense.  It's not like there are Cablinasian support groups or anything, heh...  Despite the census data, the number of people with this exact mix of ancestry has to be pretty small. 
I think it should redirect to the article on Tiger Woods.  Why?  Because this term is only notable because of him.  It's a term he uses to describe himself, not a general term that is used to describe other people.
My buddy's daughter is 1/2 Irish, 1/4 Korean, and 1/4 French.  If she becomes famous, will there be a Wikipedia page for Frenkorish?  No, that would be stupid.  --Jaysweet 16:47, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can we renominate this for deletion?? 

message: I've decided to remove the prod tag, rather than delete the article. This is not a neologism, as the term was coined by Tiger Woods, a fairly notable individual, and not by the Wikipedia editor. Moreover, the term appears at Encarta. Proding an article that survived AfD is also generally bad style in my opinion. I would encourage anyone who still believes this should be deleted or merged based on lack of notability to go to AfD.--Carabinieri 00:55, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of prod
Talk:Divya Bharti

message: __TOC__
The post you’re seeing does not indicate that Divya Bhrati is an actress or about her personal life. But, she is considered as a god and there is a crew who is there for her, for her vision and for her ambition, to fulfill the ambition she was unable to achieve.
  
The followers mentioned above are “nastic” and they are some kind of atheists and there is no consideration to the races and religions, and this approach is not forced or there is no organized structure for this attempt.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.245.161.143 (talk) 09:44, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

message: Some idiot name rajav yadev deleting stuff adding his own name here on Wikipedia someone please fix Divya Bharti Wikipedia and block that idiot Saradutt (talk) 11:42, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Idiot Rajav yadav 

message: Someone deleated so many times few initial lines about Divya(Known for her acting versatility,vivacity and beauty she is regarded as one of the most popular and highest paid actresses of her time).Please read article about Divya hindustan times 05/04/20.So many other articles and people who watch movies and her age fellows know how popular she was in early 90s.She was most demanded girl by producers after Madhuri.When she died Sridevi and Juhi picked up her movies.Its unfair with her status and for her fans someone deleat above mentioned lines.
I read wiki very often and sometimes do editing fairly according to my true knowledge but I M not IT person.Few people who r good in technology use wiki as what they want to write.If any sincere person from wikipedia help me out will be appreciated.I want to add above circled lines in Divya,s wiki....please.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aligulla (talk • contribs) 07:27, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  About Divya Bharti,s status in hindi movies 

message: I'll be improving the references section.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 00:23, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Excellent and thank you.--25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ☣ 07:45, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: To the reviewer, please be considerate while reviewing must provide good amount of time to fix issues. the article had been quick failed in the past. I have added good references, CE is completed. Still all kind of suggestions, ideas, and criticism is welcome. Thanks in advance.--25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ☣ 15:10, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The article finally a GA. To editors, you all are free to make significant edits. Please avoid adding unnecessary information about her that require strong sources. It took great time and effort to take it to GA. Let's not ruin it. Happy editing.--25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ☣✅ 17:13, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA Review 

message: * Stardust, May 1993 --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 08:40, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Cercanias

message: I started this article prepared to write about the Cercanias in Madrid because I'm very familiar with that (used to used them to commute). But I realized that it wouldn't be fair to make this article about just one of the networks, so I started to write a general article. That said, each system deserves special attention - should there be sperate articles (I could make stubs for the other 10 and write a good Madrid one) or should it all be under Cercanias? Any ideas?
For Madrid, I'm planning on generally discussing the lines (not each individually but as a whole), major stations, integration with Transporte Madrid, and the 11-M attacks. 
Feel free to leave suggestions or add some material
T Silva 08:51, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Nadodikkattu

message: I think it looks fairly a finished product. Shouldnt we remove the stub class then? Precambrian84 (talk) 12:21, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub Class?

message: Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. This article should be deleted. Irrelevant for an Encylopedia.
Savemalayalam 10:27, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see here -- thunderboltza.k.a.Deepu Joseph |TALK11:39, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Savemalayalam, Wikipedia might not be an indiscriminate collection of information, but an article on a film is not irrelevent. If you think a film artcle is irrelevant, then why do wikiprojects for films and indian films exist? --Anoopkn (talk) 09:06, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Irrelavent
Talk:Chinthavishtayaya Shyamala

message: The heroin's link point to a different Sangeetha. Actual Sangeetha's work can be found at
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0762660/
Probably need more research..  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.239.128.88 (talk) 05:00, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  sangeetha the actress links are pointing to wrong Sangeetha
Talk:Thanmathra

message: Isn't the movie known as Thanmanthra? The Silent Contributor 08:46, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Certainly not!--Jobinbasani 12:40, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename? 

message: In a medical journal(or a magazine) I read that Blessy has done little reserach on the causes and effects of Alzheimers. The doctor mentions Blessy saying in an interview that he has talked to a doctor for about two hrs about this. The doctor is disappointed because so many patients have approached him anxious of the slight memory loss they have experienced which was similar to what was shown in the movie. They were afraid they got the disease.
I have a strong feeling that this movie is inspired by the award winning Japanese movie Ashita No Kioku (2006)(Memories Of Tomorrow) directed by Yukihiko Tsutsumi, at least thats the feeling i get after reading the story lines of both these movies. (Sunnyvivi (talk) 11:37, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Real disease 

message: Removed the link to innocent as it goes to a wrong link, need to make a disambiguation page.activevoid 18:41, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: innocent

message: this article reads like promotional material. someone should tag this.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.39.129.18 (talk) 00:18, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  neutral point of view? 

message: I am one of the frequent editors of this page, but I don't understand the most recent plug referencing amitabh bachan and mohanlal. I think this is unnecessary and dilutes the nice flow of the article. I propose to remove it if nobody has any objections Abpillai (talk) 08:59, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  award plug ?
Talk:Perumthachan

message: I have modified the legend section , as the earlier version was an exact summary of the Film version .Bharatveer 13:23, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

message: To whomever it may concern :)
There is a lady on Facebook who suggested a solution to the mystery of the pillar with a very precise drawing. Here is her link https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10202104742437565&set=p.10202104742437565&type=1. Please check it. It is really very enlightening :)))
RTodorova (talk) 18:17, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  I would like to suggest an answer to the pillar assembly: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10202104742437565&set=p.10202104742437565&type=1
Talk:1942: A Love Story

message: K0P;;KL  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.255.160.67 (talk) 15:54, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is this film really released in 1994? Because many sources says otherwise. Even official webiste says it released in 1993. I'm really confused. Someone has any idea?--Hindust@niक्या करें? बातें! 14:22, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release year 

message: Here is my suggestions for the article.
# You should not italicise people's names, such as Kamna Chandra; just write it Kamna Chandra.
# Role names should also not be italicised as well; Rajeshwari Pathak (alias Rajjo) for example. You have to write it as Rajeshwari Pathak (alias Rajjo) only.
# De-italicise Indian freedom struggle.
# Dark films should be written as "dark films".
# De-italicise "R. D. Burman on behalf of Chopra when he made them listen the music of the film for the very first time".
# Song names should use double quotes (like "Ek Ladki Ko Dekha To").
 —Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 07:04, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestions
Talk:Aitraaz

message: I did a bit of copy edit.  A couple notes:
* The plot and reception sections mention "sexual harassment" but the production section mentions "rape". There should be some consistency here, or the Production section should explain why the script was changed from rape to sexual harassment.
*  What is meant by "metros"? The word has many possible uses.
It'd be great if those points could be clarified.  Thanks. – Reidgreg (talk) 21:16, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarity 

message: * Filmfare, review --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 09:18, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Angoor (1982 film)

message: There's a great deal of POV in this article. For example: 
:"The movie was a great hit and still continues to make people laugh."
:"Gulzar's ANGOOR, based upon William Shakespeare's comedy of errors is a laugh-a -minute riot that does full justice to the tale." 
:"With this movie Gulzar displays his masterly craft at situational comedies. In this movie it is very obvious why the late Sanjeev Kumar was considered by many to be the most complete Indian actor."
Through and through, the article looks like it came straight from the back of a DVD box. Which is why it should be substantially edited by someone who's actually seen the movie. Enam Esru 14:17, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: cleanup done, tag removed -- Steve Hart 21:09, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: POV problems
Talk:Awaara

message: Sunil, I didn't think your edits were an improvement on the synopsis that we had, so I reverted them. I don't want to discourage you ... we need all the help we can get here. But it might be better if you worked on providing synopses for some of the other films that don't have any; then other people can copyedit your English. There are thousands of good Bollywood films with no entries and no synopses, so the field is wide open! Zora 07:20, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sorry Sunil 

message: Why does the article title have 2 A's between the W and R, when the poster has only one?  I also have a DVD that shows it with only 1 A. BollyJeff || talk 19:04, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  title 

message: Shouldn't it be at least mid-importance? It's one of the classic films and all, if you know what I mean. Fireblazex3 (talk) 13:48, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importance rating 
Template talk:User wikipedia/Association of Inclusionist Wikipedians

message: This userbox looks nicer than the one I made, Template:User incl, and seems to cover the same area. However, three letter user template names are discouraged to avoid collision with three letter language codes, so how about moving this template to where mine is, overwriting mine? This would be inpractical if many more people use this template, ofcourse. Amaurea 08:59, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: 1) its not a 3 letter text acronym ... its a logo. 2) its the logo for the Association of Inclusionist Wikipedians. 3) there is absolutely no problem of collision with a 3 letter language code since there is no language named inc in the ISO standards, and according to the ISO standards you dont use a language group code (so no collision with Indic group code INC)  ALKIVAR™ 22:46, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I see, so that is what INC meant. I am not sure what you meant with the first point - does it matter if it is a logo or not? Anyway, I am convinced that this is the right template at the right place, now. By the way: Is AIW more exclusive than just being the collection of all inclusionist wikipedians? Amaurea 10:42, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes the AIW is more specific, any user can be an EN Wiki Inclusionist, the AIW is an association of Inclusionists across ALL Wikipedias, and sister sites. It has a more specific connotation. Of course the AIW is always open to new members, but this template was created by me to imply specific group membership.  ALKIVAR™ 11:45, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Baazigar

message: Is someone knows about which book was inspired Baazigar and who is the autor of this book?
Smartsarang 06:09, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question about Baazigar 

message: in Hindi/Urdu, word ' Baazi' (बाज़ी ) means 'Gamble'(जुआ ). hence Baazigar must mean Gambler (जुआरी ). It is justified by one of the dialogues of the protagonist in the film where he says 'one who wins after losing is called Baazigar', implying that he wins a gamble after purposely losing a car race. please do not change the translation before discussing talk page. I Am here to answer any queries. Thank You. -- Adamstraw99 (talk) 01:39, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Title translation
Talk:Baghban (2003 film)

message: This film was an unofficial adaptation of the 1937 American film Make Way for Tomorrow.  and Inspired by the Movie 1983 Hindi movie Avtaar and was remade in Kannada as Ee Bandhana in 2007.
The film was critically acclaimed, especially for the on-screen chemistry between Bachchan and Malini who came together 20 years after Nastik (1983). Their performances in the film were highly lauded.
According to film expert Rajesh Subramanian, B. R. Chopra had planned to make this movie in the mid-eighties, with Dilip Kumar and Raakhee .
Mohnish Behl was offered Aman Verma's role; he did not accept it because he did not want to be portrayed as the father of a 15-year-old girl. Juhi Chawla was selected for the role of Salman Khan's wife but could not accept because of her pregnancy. Shah Rukh Khan was offered the role played by Salman Khan. Amitabh Bachchan and Hema Malini were paired opposite each other 20 years after Nastik in 1983.
Aamir Khan and Saif Ali Khan were also offered Salman Khan's role in the film.
Amitabh Bachchan sang three songs himself.
Baghban was the last unofficial partnership between the legendary Salim–Javed screenwriter duo, Salim Khan and Javed Akhtar. Amitabh Bachchan requested that Javed Akhtar write his final speech in the movie. Salman Khan, requested his father Salim Khan to write his speech in the movie. Neither Salim Khan nor Javed Akhtar were credited.
Ravi Chopra, the director of the film, denied that this was a remake of the Rajesh Khanna-Shabana Azmi starrer Avtaar. He said that the plot of that film was about a father seeking revenge on his children while this film just focused on the bond between an old couple. He also commented that just because this film is based on family relations they are comparing it to Avtaar & Amrit. He said that just because a story revolves around the same relationship it doesn't make it alike as films can explore different aspects of that same relationship.
  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nicholas Michael Halim (talk • contribs) 09:47, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Why exactly was this para removed (including the remake/adaptation bit)? Gotitbro (talk) 16:00, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed paragraph
Talk:Black (2005 film)

message: Is the Hindi spelling ब्लॅक or ब्लैक? So far on the internet I have found ब्लॅक used only in Marathi.--Wolf talk | हिन्दी | বাংলা 16:49, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: ब्लॅक or ब्लैक

message: *
*
*
*
*
Copana2002 (talk) 15:49, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Reviews

message: Should there be any Indian script here? The title of the movie is officially in English, and the language is primarily English, so I can't see why a script is necessary. Shahid • Talk2me 16:20, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scripts? 

message: * B4U --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 02:36, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reviews?
Talk:Bobby (1973 film)

message: I moved this page to to (1973 film) from (film) since there will be a 2006 film by this name.  (film) should still remain a redirect to this page since Bobby is the dab and not Bobby (film)... I just figure it's better to use the year because once there is a dab phrase in the title it's better to be precise since it's having this article at (film) doesn't mean it is any more important. gren グレン 03:52, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move 

message: I cannot believe that Rishi Kapoor would buy a Filmfare Award for Rs 30k. For Best Actor,  when Filmfare never awarded Rishi Kapoor for Best Actor. Summer0000 (talk) 11:00, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rishi Kapoor cheated at the Filmfare Award
Talk:Edmond-Charles Genêt

message: This article appears to have suffered poorly-worded vandlism:
"It has later been discovered that he was in a secret homosexual orgy organization."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.248.35.77 (talk) 00:30, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Righter of Wrongs

message: The Jon Lassonde article appears to be copied from this one. Shawnc 09:02, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Jon Lassonde

message: I am in contact with a professional voice actor who is trying to record a spoken version of George Washington and he wants to hear someone pronounce "Edmond-Charles Genêt". If anyone would be willing to call him up or even leave a voice mail with the proper pronunciation, please email me and I will send you his contact info. Thanks. howcheng  {chat} 18:06, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation help 

message: Is it Genet or Genêt, without or with an circumflex?  The current version of article is inconsistent.Mikedelsol (talk) 02:47, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: hat or no hat
Talk:Chalte Chalte (2003 film)

message: * Shah Rukh Khan and Rani Mukerji's interviews --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 07:41, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Chameli (film)

message: I have again removed three of the non-free images used in the article. In case you are not aware, non-free images must meet our non-free content criteria in order to be usable. :Image:Chameli (Kareena Kapoor).jpg is clearly redundant to the lead image- it shows the same character from basically the same angle in basically the same clothes. It is not at all clear what :Image:Chameli (Rahul Bose).jpg is adding; yes, he's a character in the film, but is it actually essential that we know what he looked like? Is it a key part of the film? If you asked me to imagine an Indian lawyer, especially if I already knew what the actor looked like, I would imagine pretty much that. As for the album cover- yes, it is generally held that a single identifying cover image meets the NFCC in an article about said album, but this does not magically extend to other related articles, whether or not the album has its own article. Please do not revert again- as the non-free content criteria make clear, the burden of proof is on you, not me. I am happy to discuss this, but edit warring is not in anyone's interests. J Milburn (talk) 18:30, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that the images should be removed. Non-free images are not particularly appropriate for the plot summary, which is just a description of the primary source to serve as context for reading coverage from secondary sources. Showing actors in their roles is not contextually significant unless there is something about their appearance being discussed in the article body. For example, a fantasy character could be displayed in a costume design or makeup section to serve as a visual aid. Here, we have Kapoor and Bose, who have free images, and they do not look much different from in real life. If you want, you can use their free images in the article, although I would encourage more prose first. See Season of the Witch (2011 film) as an example of free images being used. As for the soundtrack cover image, MOS:FILM#Soundtrack are some recent guidelines that discourage cover images. They're seen as secondary, often being derived from the film's promotional materials. (In some cases the film poster and the film soundtrack cover pretty much match, which makes the cover image especially redundant.) Some guidelines (for films) can be seen here: WP:FILMNFI. Erik (talk | contribs) 20:54, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-free content 

message: According to IMDB this movie was released in India on 31 December, 2003. Please follow this link Chameli to see the IMDB page about the releasing dates in various countries. Jyoti Prakash Nath (talk) 06:27, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release date