lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Grand Duke Alexander Mikhailovich of Russia

message: My understanding was that his memoirs were two volumes - "Once a Grand Duke," and "Always a Grand Duke".  confirmation? john k 17:14, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I do not remember. Long time, since I read those. Shilkanni 20:43, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: The article states that the Swedish King, Gustav IV, should have been Grand Prince of Finland, the last Swedish one. This is however incorrect. Finland was never a judicially separate part of the Swedish Realm. There was no such thing as a finnish Grand Principality or Duchy prior to the russian anexsion. Therefor there could also never have been any "princes of Finland" or any any other specific heirs to this part om the Swedish Realm before that time. Alexander might well have been in the line to the Swedish throne, as this belonged to the senior bransch of the Holstein-Gottorp house. However I don't believe this was the actual situation. The first Swedish King of the Holstein-Gottorp house, was Adolf Fredrik, son of Christian August, a younger prince of the Duchy of Holstein-Gottorp. Adolf Fredrik was considered for the Swedish throne, mainly because of his mother being a descendant of the House of Wasa. As Adolf Fredrik became King of Sweden, the throne became in the hands of a Holstein-Gottorp junior line. That would not in my believe constitute any rights for the Holstein-Gottorp senior line, to which Grand Prince Alexande Mikhailovich belonged, to the Swedish throne. Thus, the Grand Prince would neither have been a Prince of Sweden, and certainly not a Prince of Finland. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 83.250.205.59 (talk) 10:46, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Swedish Grand Princes of Finland and Sweden? 

message: NY Times January 10, 1915, Sunday — A Turkish official statement received here today says that the Grand Duke Alexander Michaelovitch, brother-in-law of Emperor Nicholas, was killed in the fighting at Miandoab, Persia. --Dnikitin (talk) 17:59, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interesting
Talk:Henry William Pitcher

message: I dont think the picture on this page is of HENRY PITCHER, for a start he is dressed as a sailor, it may be a picture of ERNEST PITCHER? - Comments? - scubadel@hotmail.com.
 
This was also raised on the refdesk recently ( Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Archives/Humanities/June_2012 ).  There seems to be some doubt about the accuracy of this photo; it shows a naval rating, not an army officer, for one thing.  Compare .  There's some resemblance so this may be a relative, but I don't think it's the man the article is about.  I've taken the photo out of the article for now. FiggyBee (talk) 01:18, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo
Talk:Leopold, Grand Duke of Baden

message: I removed the following:
"According to church records in Baden, Leopold also had two sons with Sophia Vittali, the daughter of an Italian-born merchant named Pietro Vittali: Charles Emil August Vittali (born in 1831) and Otto Hermann Leopold Vittali (born in 1832).Sophia Vittali (1810-?) : Geni.com (retrieved 14 March 2013)."
Geni.com is not a reliable source, and as far as I can tell the geni page does not even cite any sources. --Hegvald (talk) 09:20, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Illegitimate children
Talk:Prince Maximilian of Baden

message: Maybe I've overlooked the info but I couldn't find a mention of his homosexuality which played a major role in his politics as he was afraid to be blackmailed and had an inferiority complex. German.Knowitall (talk) 21:01, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Homosexual

message: Hi,
I was wondering if anyone who contributed to this page knows anything about the book cited as a reference: "My Syllabus of Errors"? Thanks for any help.
--Exabyte7 16:48, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Exabyte7

message: The photo was deleted from the Commons for lack of proper (c) tags.  I'm trying to get it restored either there or here.  See diff for details.  davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 01:44, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo inquiry in progress

message: Why change his name into an English version "Max of Baden"? On the other hand Hindenburg is written in German: Paul von Hindenburg.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.238.107.181 (talk) 09:02, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: Prince from Baden is an other as from Baden-Baden, now live theere the Prince Bernhardt von baden-baden. reni von Bifamo,www.baden-baden.de,--82.113.4.33 (talk) 08:59, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prince from Baden-Baden, germany 

message: To claim that this prince was jewish and sodomized Hitler is of course a hoax. His ancestry is purely aristocratic and german. This should be corrected. See the german version !  — Preceding unsigned comment added by TotoTheObscure (talk • contribs) 16:00, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hoax 

message: The current structure of the article has Max's attempted match with Alix following his actual marriage - should this be restructured? MPCaton (talk) 08:07, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marriage 
Template talk:Rooster Teeth personnel

message: I fixed a bunch of errors, mainly a lot of major voice actors not being listed, Jason not being listed as a staff member, and Nathan Zellner not being listed at all. 
If anyone has a problem with what I've done, make sure your edit is consistent with what the official cast list http://redvsblue.com/cast/ and staff list http://roosterteeth.com/staff/ say. --Roeas (talk) 08:44, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Errors
Talk:Carola of Vasa

message: A case can be made against categorizing this woman as a Swedish princess, since her paternal grandfather and his entire line of the dynasty were formally deposed in 1809. However, her father and his family were considered de facto Swedish royalty in many weighty circles throughout Europe, at least during the reign of the first Bernadotte king and up until such time as it became clear to all that the Oldenburgs (Holstein-Gottorpian branch) would never be restored to that throne. Consequently, the remains of her father and infant brother were also eventually interred in the royal Gustavian crypt in the official pantheon of Sweden in Stockholm.
But Queen Carola was definitely not ever a Norwegian princess, her father was never a Norwegian prince amd his father never King of Norway. It was her great-granduncle Carl XIII who took over the Swedish throne when his nephew (her grandfather) was thrown out, and then in 1814 gained the Norwegian throne, too. SergeWoodzing (talk) 20:46, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: De facto is the wrong word. De facto means, as the link say, "in practice but not necessarily ordained by law", and Carola was not a Swedish princess in practice. I think the word you are loking for is "titular" - princess, similarly to the "kings" of the deposed Stuart line. But, of course, you are correct : she should not be called a Swedish princess. --85.226.44.210 (talk) 09:33, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  I know what all these terms mean, thank you! "Titular" she was not, de facto is what she was in the minds of her dynasty's supporters and the writings of some historians. I am not sure she should not be considered a Swedish princess, though never titular nor official Princess of Sweden. SergeWoodzing (talk) 15:36, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scandinavian princess?
Talk:Wilhelm Grewe

message: He formulated several political advices for Nazis. It seems tha article misses that fact.--MyMoloboaccount (talk) 00:34, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nothing about advice to Nazis ? 

message: Would an interview with Wilhelm Grewe from 1986 be useful here as an external link? Focus of conversation is nuclear weapons policy. http://openvault.wgbh.org/catalog/V_D4492E23AE9940A1885A8E4AD8B962A3 (I helped with the site, so it would be conflict of interest for me to just add it.) Mccallucc (talk) 16:48, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External link to interview on nuclear policy?
Talk:Ferdinand Hiller

message: Robert Schumann's piano concerto is dedicated to him. Is there some place that I can't see that this would fit in? —  $PЯINGεrαgђ  22:48, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

message: :I also can't see a place in the article to fit it in without disrupting the flow of the paragraphs. Schumann isn't mentioned at all in the article as it is now so that's probably why. Graham87 07:15, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Given this, the part about the Hiller Lock should be reworded/removed: https://indianexpress.com/article/technology/science/beethoven-gene-sequencing-health-death-hearing-loss-8513098/ (Scroll to the end of the article) 68.20.8.122 (talk) 15:37, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: And here's a link to the actual research: https://www.cell.com/current-biology/fulltext/S0960-9822(23)00181-1 68.20.8.122 (talk) 15:43, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove part about Hiller Lock
Talk:Frederick I of Sweden

message: Seeing as Fred is the 'only' King Frederick of Sweden; why isn't the article called Frederick of Sweden. GoodDay (talk) 23:43, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: A very good question. How about a move request? He was (legitimately) Fredrrick I of Hesse-Cassel, but not of Sweden. SergeWoodzing (talk) 14:42, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: He used the ordinal, and so should we, regardless of the non-existence of any other kings of Sweden named Frederick. john k (talk) 02:09, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Why, Frederick I?

message: This page lists the death and end of reign of Frederick I as 5 April 1751.  However, the reign of his successor Adolf Frederick begins the previous month 25 March 1751.  Was there really overlap? ChrisDailey (talk) 15:29, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: As it's the same day in different calendars, that looks like the difference between the old and new calendars. Celia Homeford (talk) 08:32, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timeline issue
Talk:Hedvig Sophia of Sweden

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Edofedinburgh 01:35, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: Well, as her brother the king had no son, his sisters was in fact his heirs, as female succession had ben allowed in the constitution of 1604, wich made Christina queen. As is oldest sister, Hedvig Sofia was in fact his heir, and after the birth of her son, he became third in line after her. You are perfectly right, however, that this was never in any way officiall or formall, and that Ulrika Eleonora was elected after some dispute. Newertheless, Ulrika Eleonora was elected because female succession was in fact allowed in Sweden before her, and after many had considered Hedvigs son, the heir to her rights. One could therefor say, that although Hedvig Sofia never had the title Crown-princess, nor had her rights to the throne formally aknowledged, she was in reality the heir because of Swedish law! I hope we can agree on this compromise, as it is the truth.  --Aciram 13:57, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heir?
Talk:River Elegy

message: Uh, He Shang right? This is a book. -- Миборовский 22:52, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article should link to Hai jin. The obvious place is in the sentence that currently reads, "...the Ming Dynasty's ban on maritime activities...."  But I am confused by that sentence as it now stands.  Would someone with a better understanding of this topic please add the link? Thanks! (sdsds - talk) 03:59, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hai jin
Portal talk:Belgium/Anniversaries/March/March 16

message: I hope you don't mind I changed the image here. --Ganchelkas 22:59, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem, I had used the flag of Wallonia twice (birth and death of designer), so changing it once at least is perfect. Fram 19:28, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Erik Johansson Vasa

message: I believe the link to Örby is wrong, his birthplace was not the Örby linked to, but to another Örby. Dan Koehl (talk) 17:59, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't have a source yet, but I believe he was born at Örbyhus Castle, which was owned by his father. Dan Koehl (talk) 20:07, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: No objections, so I changed to Örbyhus. Dan Koehl (talk) 11:46, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthplace Örby or Örbyhus?
Talk:Nocturne

message: Oh come on, there has got to me more information about nocturne than that. Form, structure, tonality etc? Please some muso's come and write this out.
Hi there i am in urgent need of the nocturnes usual time signatures thanx 121.72.134.176 06:49, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: More information needed

message: : One would think there would be more of a focus on Frédéric Chopin in this article?WackoJacko (talk) 09:53, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Frédéric Chopin]]

message: Planning to add some additional content on the dual and vocal nocturne's... expect to eventually link in to this article as the parent.--Matthewpierce (talk) 02:44, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Stuff about other uses of the word do not belong in this article which is about the music. Squinge (talk) 23:31, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elaboration 

message: While a great many classical composers are listed, nocturnes (or the "style") could be attributed to a number of composers of orchestral music for soundtracks.   I'm not sure a complete list is can be made, nor prudent to even attempt.  Rather, provide some samples from different era's would be better.  Thomas Newman is one of my favourites for generating tunes/tracks (from movies that he composed for) that fall into this genre, but there are many others.  Imagine theme music for when you are walking a serene, contemplative path - and alone at 3AM.  That's how I describe a nocturne. --71.10.145.225 (talk) 03:35, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modern Day composers of Nocturnes 

message: I don't understand the phrase 'and then laid aside'. Does this mean that the piece was intended for a single performance on a specific occasion, and would not ever be heard again? Or does it mean literally 'discarded'? ~ 2001:8003:3020:1C00:880A:6BB5:220:EDA (talk) 00:02, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  '...normally played for an evening party and then laid aside'.
Talk:The King of Fighters '99

message: Found this: Game Informer review. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 01:31, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference material 

message: Does it really has windows version? Or someone confuses console emulator with native version...? 87.79.167.201 (talk) 12:14, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Windows
Talk:Princess Cecilia of Sweden

message: This article needs revision and correction of numerous typographical and syntactical errors, infelicitous phraseology, etc.  It may be necessary to re-write/re-compose certain sentences/sections. 86.184.115.241 (talk) 17:25, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: You are very welcome to correct the language yourself, providing that you have sufficient knowledge and do not change the content of the article. --Aciram (talk) 18:30, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Typos and syntactical errors

message: I believe this referencing format is inappropriate - looks very bad, I think, below the article with that long list of the exact same source repeated over and over and and over. Needs to be adjusted. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 06:08, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference format

message: Her one suitor was  Henry, the earl of Arundel. ---- 2001:14BA:4857:A000:189E:411:8C37:3E78 (talk) 19:49, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  a proposed marriage 

message: as it now reads in article, "Cecilia married Christopher II, Margrave of Baden-Rodemachern (1537–1575), in June 1564 in Stockholm. It is noted that the wedding was far less luxurious than that of her sister Anna, and that it seem to have taken place without much negotiation: the first contract had been signed as late as March the same year. Neither does there seem to have been any political purpose behind the marriage."
Margrave Christoph, a younger son of his family ad accordingly somewhat 'penniless', functioned as a mercenary warrior in Swedish service, in king Eric's war against Denmark-Norway. Christoph was prepared to accept whatever wealthy and high enough marriage, and obtain advancement in Swedish service. Cecilia, with her damaged reputation, was not sought after by real ruling princes. The marriage was thus one 'made in heaven' for two less-desirable persons: Cecilia really needed a husband and a high noble, though impoverished, was a catch for her. Christoph in his impoverished state obtained much better than he had really a justification to wish for. Christoph's career as a new kinsman of the royal family was thus well-prepared for the future. However, it was not to be. These two wastrels were in desire to snatch much more - and they managed to live with some luxury by others' money, becoming indebted everywhere where they went. 2001:14BA:4857:A000:189E:411:8C37:3E78 (talk) 20:00, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rodemachern marriage
Talk:The King of Fighters 2002

message: Hopping around GameFAQs had me confront this thread:
http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/genmessage.php?board=953055&topic=48088053
This shows the track listing for KOF 2002 UM, which the user has taken from Cyberfanatix, and Geese and Goenitz's themes are listed there (As well as a track called "R-Bite", which is as yet unidentified.). SHould this be noteworthy or not? MightyKombat (talk) 18:52, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Track listing confirms Geese and Goenitz for Unlimited MAtch.

message: What is the source for the statement that King of Fighters 2002: Ultimate Match will be coming to Xbox Live Arcade? I haven't seen any other info to corroborate this. Could the user who added the info have confused King of Fighters 2002: Ultimate Match with King of Fighters '98: Ultimate Match which was released last week on Xbox Live Arcade? Hophi (talk) 16:45, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  KOF2002: Ultimate Match on Xbox Live Arcade?
Talk:Katie Webster

message: Added :Category:1999 deaths - referenced from AMG bio. Cricket02 23:28, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Death
Talk:Sten Sture the Elder

message: Isn't it somewhat bizarre to describe him as regent during the Union of Kalmar, when in fact the periods when he was regent, were the periods when the Union of Kalmar was not in existence?--Barend (talk) 14:13, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "During the Union of Kalmar"?

message: The article had been, unilaterally and without discussion, moved to "Steen Sture the Old". This was a bad move for several reasons: There was no explanation for the use of to 'e's in "Steen" - the whold article, and all sources I've seen, uses "Sten". Second, "the Old" is a more clumsy translation than "the Elder". I moved the article back.--Barend (talk) 07:40, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved the article

message: This sentence needs clarification or correction.  Sture was a Swede so why did he fight against Swedish forces?  How could this action against Danish forces be in support of Christian I of Denmark?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lakeside789 (talk • contribs) 23:48, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: "At the Battle of Brunkeberg in 1471, he triumphed against Swedish and Danish forces in the support of Christian I. "

message: This picture is used in many wikipedias to illustrate the aftermath of the Battle at Brunkeberg 1471 or the Danish-Swedish war of 1470/71. In 1471 the victorous Sten Sture was around 20 or 21 years old. The Sten Sture in this picture, however, looks much older. More likely this picture illustrates Sten Stures welcome in Stockholm in 1501... thirty years later when he was around 50yo. --Roksanna (talk) 07:44, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better do not use this pic to illustrate Brunkeberg 1471
Category talk:Wikipedia multilingual support templates

message: Shouldn't Template:lang-nds direct to Low German since that's the name of the article? —  AjaxSmack   23:21, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: please, please stop creating these  templates. It is insane to create separate templates for the 5,000 or so languages in ISO. It is perfectly sufficient, and much cleaner to just use  directly. What you are doing is creating a crapload of templates that do nothing else but transclude another template. Which is a bad idea already for concerns of server load. I would even recommend scrapping that too, and spell out the langauge link in the text, as in 
:French: . 
All "multilingual support templates" we should need are  and , and maybe a couple of special cases like  or  for specified transliteration standards. If for some reason we keep these templates around, they should always be subst:ed! dab (𒁳) 10:10, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: From what I remember, template transclusion hasn't been an issue as far as the server load is concerned for quite a while now.  As long as transcluded templates are not frequently edited (and  templates are certainly not edited often), the server load effects of requesting a transcluded template vs. a regular template are pretty much the same.  And since the server load isn't an issue, then there is really no compelling reason to sacrifice convenience these templates offer.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 16:07, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What Ëzhiki said above, in 2007, is even more true today over 7 years later.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  07:26, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: will somebody think of the children

message: Why do some lang templates render the content in italics (e.g. , ), while others do not (e.g. , )? I think that no italics would be preferable, but above all these templates should be consistent. GregorB 21:56, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I get it now: Latin script - italics; not a Latin-based script - no italics. That's MoS. GregorB (talk) 18:14, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Italics
Talk:Zatch Bell! Mamodo Fury

message: Can anyone confirm that the "boss characters" are playable in the Japanese version?
I was able to obtain a copy, and there are only twenty character slots if you count Victoream.
Also, I tried beating Patie on normal mode with an A-rank, but she was not unlocked.
Could it be that they are unplayable in the Japanese version as well?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.226.14.27 (talk) 00:28, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Characters in The Japanese Version

message: *This (rather shoddily written) article should be merged here, then deleted.  The name is wrong (Zatch Bell is the English title, and the rest is Japanese) and thus not a likely search term. Danny Lilithborne 02:00, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Zatch Bell! Gekitou Saikyou no Mamonotachi]] 

message: The game modes section is written in second person ("you do this") rather than third person ("the player can do this") which is standard for an encyclopedia, but oddly I'm having trouble seeing how to change this.  RJFJR (talk) 19:34, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  game modes section written in second person