lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Bobby Plump

message: I am in the process of creating this entry and therefore I would like to contest the nomination for speedy deletion.  This is my first attempt at creating an entry and I am learning as I go, so it might not have been pretty at first.  The nonsense was caused as a result of my then lack of knowledge regarding the sandbox and its proper use.  I feel that the page is currently in a state that makes sense and is coherent.  Also Once I manage to complete the basic body of the article I feel that it will defiantly provide enough meaningful content and/or history to be deemed acceptable.  I just need a little more time.  If anybody is still under the impression that it deserves deletion, please let me know what specifically it is that makes you think deletion is called for.  In other words let me try to fix the problem.  Of course all input is welcomed. Joshbrees (talk) 13:56, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't understand why a high school athlete, even a very good one, would meet the notability criteria.  Can you cite reliable sources that verify how important this person is? -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 14:00, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Here is an excerpt along with the link that it is off of: "Even today, the '54 Indians impact is still felt by the community.  "Bobby Plump is a legend. He could've probably been governor of this state if he wanted to," said Roger Dickinson, president of the Indiana Basketball Hall of Fame. Plump was named one of the Most Noteworthy Hoosiers of the 20th century by Indianapolis Monthly Magazine. He was also one of the 50 greatest sports figures from Indiana in the 20th century, according to Sports Illustrated."  This is of this site:http://www.sportshollywood.com/hoosiers.html  He is really more then just a high school basketball player.  He has a couple different books out and frequently speaks all over his region. Joshbrees (talk) 14:12, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it looks like several people have taken a look at this discussion and agreed that he's not just a high school player; you'll have the time you need to develop the article, and when you're finished, if anyone still thinks it should be deleted, it'll have to go through a community discussion before the decision is made. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 14:42, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There's some good stuff available at Google Books. Zagalejo^^^ 08:24, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ditmars Boulevard

message: What about the section of Ditmars Blvd that runs parallel to the Grand Central, from 86th to 111th street? ~~ JohnAstoria  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.252.8.185 (talk) 17:08, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Question
Talk:Those Dancing Days

message: This band is pretty notable.
Very hyped up by the NME, a nomination for the best band in Sweden, frequent play on MTV2, etc...
There are far less notable bands that have articles on wikipedia. <Br>
Additionally I must attack the way the tag was added- within seconds of the page's creation. There's no way the band's notability could have been checked in that time. --Josquius (talk) 14:26, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 1st attempt

message: They meet the following:
1: That I've seen at the very least they've been in NME a fair few times including one big feature. They've also been featured on a lot of online sources. 
4: They've definatly done that. Just look to their myspace, all their upcoming gigs are abroad. 
7: Debatable here but IMO they're one of the more well known current Swedish bands.
8: The MTV Europe awards nomination. That's quite a big deal11: Not on the radio that I know of but they are on regular rotation on MTV2. Surely that is covered by that too?
I must state that- yeah they aren't the most well known band in the world.Compared to many bands with articles on wikipedia however they are The Beatles. (i.e. These)--Josquius (talk) 22:04, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 2nd attempt

message: These sources do not ever belong in External links. I have moved the link farm from there to this talk page where they do belong. Warning: I didn't check them over, so be careful in choosing any references here. Thank you! --Leahtwosaints (talk) 21:05, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources belong here, not in External links 
Talk:Limone sul Garda

message: On this page, Limone sul Garda is referred to as a town, a city, and a village. Clarification needed - what is it?
213.105.59.49 (talk) 10:46, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Bouquet of Barbed Wire

message: Watching the "remake"  I am thinking it is a complete rewrite, with a plot only very loosely connected to the original.  Am I mistaken?  For myself, I thought the original brilliant.  I am finding the remake compelling but shallow, with editing standing in place of both narrative coherence and realism, and with some furiously dramatic acting held together by endless snapshots of cryptic expressions.   Almost the only thing the two series seem to have in common is their title.
LookingGlass (talk) 20:10, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: While I agree that it has been comprehensively reimagined, it does fall within the definition of remake - perhaps the word "remake" in the article should be substituted with "re-interpreted"? I'll be bold and see how it goes. Keristrasza (talk) 20:23, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remake - rewrite ? 

message: Instead of the heading it has currently what if it was changed to plot (1976 version)? Needs2learnmore talk 04:13, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  1976 adaptation title 

message: The title of the book is adopted from an experience Newman had while on a walk with her mother.
Err. I do not understand this. Could someone be more specific, please?
:The interview in the Daily Telegraph expands a little to say that her dog ran under a barbed wire fence.  But  don't think its worth mentioning in the lede.Martinlc (talk) 09:41, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title: what does this mean?
Talk:Three Poles Challenge

message: The first woman and the first 'lebanese to reach everest' are the only notable things of mention of the three pole challenge?  C'mon, someone who knows about this write something about it.  It's currently all over the news for the English guy who did it in 19 months. 210.49.15.52 (talk) 14:35, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article is a stubby stub!

message: How come Edmund Hillary isn't the first person (or at least someone before Erling Kagge) to complete this?
* Mount Everest May 29th 1953
* South Pole January 4th 1958
* North Pole 1985 (with Neil Armstrong)
Seems strange. Poker Flunky (talk) 21:57, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Edmund Hillary
Talk:FOXL2

message: I tried to comb the article for anything I could save, but there was nothing. Written for a university assignment, a lot of jargon text without introduction, totally inappropriate emphatic tone with personal pronouns, incorrect grammar and missing links. Don't know why that article was accepted at AfC when there was already an article for forkhead box protein L2, but if anyone thinks they can rescue any of the sources used for addition here, they're welcome to try. SUM1 (talk) 01:06, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notice about merge of [[Special:Permalink/930133700|Forkhead Box Protein L2]]
Talk:Pterotrachea coronata

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  -- ascidian | talk-to-me 13:21, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:FOXO3

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage.) Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3986584/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 08:20, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:FOXO4

message: How is this related to proxofim? See https://scicasts.com/channels/clinical-research/2045-drug-applications/12433-researchers-find-way-to-reverse-ageing-according-to-study/  and http://www.healthbusinessuk.net/news/24032017/drug-found-reverse-ageing Andries (talk) 12:18, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Manerba del Garda

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added one citation link, there is an active draft for the related page at Draft:Rocca di Manerba del Garda (Lombardy). 
Cheers. TheGodfatherVitoCorleone (talk).  —Preceding undated comment added 12:25, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation links added
Talk:Whitton, London

message: Whitton is made up of two electoral wards; Heathfield Ward and Whitton Ward. The page talks about places in both wards, but the census data only reflects one of the wards. Thus the population and housing statistics only reflect 50% of the true position. Could someone with better editing skills look into this please.
Momentum2014 (talk) 21:23, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Ward Information

message: Whilst much of the anecdotal history of growing up after WWII is an English history account, this article is not the place for some of it; the gunpowder mills playing area certainly should stay - can it still be used for play?  And I think keep anything else unique.  However much of the rest sadly will need a cautious, DONT BITE THE NEWBIES, and WP:NPOV editor to amend to meet WP:notability / WP:verifiable and What wikipedia is not.  I'll have a go but will leave most in. Adam37 (talk) 22:09, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Post War History - or social historian's report

message: One section states that the distance from the M25 is only ten minutes by car. The shortest route from the town centre is 7.5 miles, thus meaning the car driver would have to AVERAGE 45 mph in an area where virtually all roads have a 20 mph limit. I shall correct this shortly unless someone can suggest an explanation. Other times in this section are similarly difficult to support. Plingsby (talk) 15:44, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Accessibility
Talk:Masters Music Publications

message: IMO this music publishing company does meet the notability guidelines for inclusion on Wikipedia.  However, aside from its website and entries on numerous music retailers such as Patti Music and Sheet Music Plus, I am having difficulty finding online source material, and could use some help expanding the article. Random Pipings (talk) 15:03, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

message: Masters is a division of Edwin F. Kalmus, as explained in the Kalmus article. Just a couple of weeks ago, they (Kalmus) purchased Ludwig Music Publishing of Cleveland, Ohio and have renamed the Msters division LudwigMasters Publications. You can read the announcement on their website. I agree that it doesn't rate a separate page, since it is simply a division of the parent company. BTW, I am one of their composers, so I'm not just some music publisher obsessed character out there making crazy statements (though I reserve the right to make crazy statements in person, I really try to restrain myself in Wikipedia comments). Csmpsn (talk) 08:52, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  It's a division of Edwin F. Kalmus
Talk:Calcite sea

message: Harvard ref style is perfectly acceptable in Wikipedia and has been basically forever as far as Wikipedia history goes. The reference style of the article is totally self consistent. Wikipedia referencing in general is totally inconsistent or non-existant. Therefore adding that senseless tag with the absurd comment: The current reference style is NOT consistent with the rest of Wikipedia is totally out of line. The article is far better referenced than 90+ percent of Wikipedia, therefor the tagging of this article as was done amounts to near vandalism. Vsmith (talk) 15:44, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I wrote that absurd comment in the bad edit summary. Sorry. I must have become sleepy and stupid at the same time last night.  I posted that  tag to ask for external linking of the refs, if available.  I'm more used to referencing per WP:PMID, with links to the actual report often included, allowing me to read more on the subject. I'd better not type too much. I'm not totally awake yet.... --PFHLai (talk) 18:11, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Citation style

message: And I very much understand the sleepy part!  Best wishes with your editing.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wilson44691 (talk • contribs) 21:20, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thank you -- I'm glad someone is reading it!
Talk:Rupert Lonsdale

message: Seems to be a dearth of info online about this this vessel, this is all I've been able to find. Did it go by any other names? Drutt (talk) 07:15, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Here we go: HM Submarine X1. Drutt (talk) 07:18, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: XI?
Talk:Ashley Spencer (actress)

message: I'm removing the section about her being cast in Wicked until there is proof it's true.71.66.230.44 (talk) 11:52, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Wicked

message: As this had been on from Nov 2007 to Sept 2011, and I couldn't find proof of notability, I nominated it at AfD. Consensus was that she was notable (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashley Spencer) so I've now removed the tag. Boleyn (talk) 08:06, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability tag
Talk:List of monarchs of the Kingdom of the Two Sicilies

message: This article says "Joachim Murat was the first king to rule a kingdom which was called "Two Sicilies" by the Edict of Bayonne, in 1808" , but see capitulation signed on 12 June 1798 https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/bitstream/1887/4576/4/Thesis.pdf , the Bailiff de Turin Frisari signs "without prejudice to the right of domination which belongs to my Sovereign, the King of the Two Sicilies". Red taxi (talk) 19:06, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  '''who was the first "king of the two sicilies"?''' 

message: Since every monarch listed here bore the same title – "King of the Two Sicilies" – why isn't the article titled List of Kings of the Two Sicilies? Michael Hardy (talk) 03:54, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why such a complicated title?
Talk:List of monarchs of Naples

message: Good job to whoever add much of the information, however I feel there should be an article List of viceroys of Naples for the viceroys as they weren't actually Kings... I'll put them here on the talk if anyone wants to create such an article. - Gennarous (talk) 15:33, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Viceroys

message: A couple of issues:
#Shouldn't Philip V be listed as a proper king?  He was recognized as King in 1700, and remained in authority until 1707, at least.  Between 1707 and 1713, it's arguable that he was de jure king and Charles de facto, until the Treaty of Utrecht, but he was surely king up to 1707, wasn't he?
#Should we really list the short-lived "Neapolitan Republic" here as a definitive break in Philip III/IV's reign?  If so, why don't we list Charles VIII's brief rule in 1495-1496? john k (talk) 03:38, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  A few nitpicks 

message: Are these five men king consorts or jure uxoris kings? Do they deserve a spot on this list?
*Andrew, Duke of Calabria
*Louis, Prince of Taranto
*James IV of Majorca
*Otto, Duke of Brunswick-Grubenhagen
*James II, Count of La Marche
--Queen Elizabeth II's Little Spy (talk) 08:00, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I suppose it's never too late. This book explains that Louis was the only one of Joanna I's husbands who reigned alongside her. The other three were also styled as kings, but were officially excluded from the government and their names did not appear next to Joanna's on coins and documents. In other words, Andrew, James and Otto were kings consort. I am not sure about James, though. I'll look him up later. Surtsicna (talk) 15:58, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  King consorts
Talk:Tai-Shan Schierenberg

message: As the article stands right now, there's nothing that indicates the notability of the subject. Joyous! | Talk 15:51, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Much improved. Joyous! | Talk 17:50, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Was on selection panel and acted as judge on Landscape Artist of Year 2015 shown on Sky Arts. See http://www.textileartist.org/landscape-textile-art/ though there are probaby more appropriate references.78.150.14.43 (talk) 18:28, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Landscape Artist of Year 2015
Talk:Modern paganism in German-speaking Europe

message: The lead states flatly that "Neopaganism" began in German-speaking Europe in the 1970s, while later in the article the same time frame is mentioned as a period of "revival" of Neopagan thought in the same region. The article seems to suggest that Neopaganism began at the end of the 19th century in German-speaking Europe. So, were List, Lanz & Co. Neopagans or not?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.218.70.148 (talk) 23:14, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  1970's? 

message: Would it be appropriate to add some mention of pagan metal groups like Eluveitie and Equilibrium, and events like Heidenfest? Q·L·1968 ☿ 22:13, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pagan metal 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: MOVED. Although there was no discussion at this article, the request appears uncontroversial and aligns with similar articles.  Hadal (talk) 20:20, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Neopaganism in German-speaking Europe →  – Consistency with the main page - Modern paganism and regional pages such as Modern paganism in the United Kingdom and Modern paganism in Scandinavia. Ingwina (talk) 11:52, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 12 March 2023
Talk:Salò

message: i think a reference to pasolini's film "salò" would be of interest.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.48.97.83 (talk) 14:54, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cinema 
Talk:Bardolino

message: 1. "in 1848 it revolted against them in the wake of the first Piedmontese victories in the First Italian War of Independence."
The adjective Piedmontese is not accurate since it had to do with the Kingdom of Piedmont-Sardinia as two entities under a single kingdom. Using Piedmontese is misleading and it links the historical events to an partially correct geography.
2. "Free entry for individual visitors, against reservation for groups."
What does "against reservation for groups" mean?
ICE77 (talk) 17:08, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment and question on the article
Talk:Lazise

message: 1. "The 14th-century La Pergolana villa, a kilometre north of Lazise, hosts a honey festival during the first weekend of October."
This is not history and it should be in a section of its own.
2. The "Scaliger Castle" section says that the castled was built "maybe just before the father Cansignorio della Scala". That "maybe" does not sound right. Is there a source that justifies the use of that word?
3. After the above, Porta Nuova is introduced but it's not explained until later. The paragraph should be reorganized to introduce and explain what Porta Nuova is and why it was calles like that.
4. An image of the coat of arms of Lazise would be appropriate for the section that talks about it.
5. I think "Traditions and folklore" and "Events" could be merged and include the sentence at point 1 above.
6. The "Events" section introduces "anara col pien". I assume anara is the spelling in Veneto for the word anatra which is Italian. Can somebody born and raised in Veneto confirm?
7. The third, eight and ninth images in the gallery need a caption.
ICE77 (talk) 05:44, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments and questions on the article
Talk:Daylin Leach

message: Just off hand, this article needs to discuss his bawdy blog (where he facetiously proposed changing the age of consent to "when poppa ain't around"), as well as his redistricting plan and the emergency contraceptive bill. --RedShiftPA (talk) 16:13, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Still need 

message: This article should include a section on the controversy around sexual assault allegations against Leach.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.124.141.120 (talk) 19:15, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sexual Assault Allegations Controversy