lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Anglican terminology

message: There's no definition of a bishop here
:True. There's a link to bishop, though. Charles Matthews 15:22, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Bishop

message: Can't all this info be put into the article Anglicanism? Feedback?  I may be bold soon. -- SECisek 21:34, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Is this page of value?
Talk:Venus and Adonis (opera)

message: Members of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles are in the process of doing a re-review of current Good Article listings to ensure compliance with the standards of the Good Article Criteria. (Discussion of the changes and re-review can be found here). A significant change to the GA criteria is the mandatory use of some sort of in-line citation (In accordance to WP:CITE) to be used in order for an article to pass the verification and reference criteria. Currently this article does not include in-line citations. It is recommended that the article's editors take a look at the inclusion of in-line citations as well as how the article stacks up against the rest of the Good Article criteria. GA reviewers will give you at least a week's time from the date of this notice to work on the in-line citations before doing a full re-review and deciding if the article still merits being considered a Good Article or would need to be de-listed. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact us on the Good Article project talk page or you may contact me personally. On behalf of the Good Articles Project, I want to thank you for all the time and effort that you have put into working on this article and improving the overall quality of the Wikipedia project. Agne 01:51, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Inline citations have been added. If there are specific things a reviewer would like an inline citation for, I would appreciate specific comments. Mak (talk) 19:22, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA Re-Review and In-line citations 

message: I am currently working on a basic research for the university about this masque and had access to The New Grove. What I read there was: "his masque Venus and Adonis was performed at court[...]" (vol.3 - page 719, 2001).
Though I haven't read every reference about the masque, it seems clear to me that The New Grove doesn't create a "versus" situation when it comes to comparing with other sources (as it happens in the current version). Miguel Maduro-Dias (talk) 17:49, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  The New Grove and "Masque"
Talk:The Fairy-Queen

message: I'd recommend developing the synopsis which is currently very short (see Grove which has a much longer one), while adding performance and recording histories and a bibliography. Hope this is helpful. - Kleinzach 17:34, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As Moreschi noted elsewhere, it does not make sense to have a long synopsis in this case, since it's a very literal rendition of A midsummer night's dream and people can go to that article for a synopsis of the play. (this is mostly for GA reviewers' benefit). Mak (talk) 17:00, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Bibliography done. Moreschi 21:48, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Good article nomination

message: After a slight reshuffling and a little tweaking (which of course others are welcome to examine and perhaps rereshuffle and retweak or detweak), I decided that this was a good article. Well done, Moreschi and collaborators! -- Hoary 05:42, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: This article is good

message: The article says:
"The orchestra for The Fairy-Queen consists of two flutes, two oboes, two trumpets, kettledrums, strings and harpsichord continuo."
I think that it is now accepted that those "flutes" is what we today know as "recorders", so I'm changing the word flute to recorder. Hope everybody agrees, I have not been able to find references for that, but I think it is quite clear, as that part is played by recorders in every Historically Informed Performance of the work nowadays. By the way, congratulations for a wonderful article (better than good, in my humble opinion).194.154.219.97 11:06, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for your praise! "Recorders" is correct, much obliged that you fixed this. Cheers, Moreschi  Talk 19:07, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Orchestration: flutes or recorders?

message: Lost til the early 20th century.
What’s the story? (How was it rediscovered)?
(The link doesn’t say). 
MBG02 (talk) 17:50, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lost
Talk:Census tract

message: I think that discussion counties in this definition might confuse some people since tracts are typically smaller than counties. Antonrojo 14:11, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Move Alaska County info to County Section?

message: A brief description of the heirarcy of geographic Census elements would be helpful for people trying to figure out the difference between blockgroup, MSA, CBSA, tracts, etc. I plan to add stubs for any of these that aren't present or anyone who knows this stuff might do so if I haven't gotten around to it.Antonrojo 14:11, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You might want to start by perusing the articles in :Category:Demographics of the United States.  There already are articles for many of these terms.  Also, I think you may have misspelled some and perhaps have not presented the hierarchy accurately -- for example, FIPS place codes are not a part of the census hierachy but are rather used to identify places. Don't have time right now to look things up. The U.S. Census Bureau web site has a wealth of resources (although it can be a maze getting to the informative background documentation). older ≠ wiser 17:50, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the info. I'll look those over and edit as appropriate. This was a rough first draft and feel free to make any obvious changes I miss. Antonrojo 19:00, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

text: I'm storing the heirarchy section I started here until I have time to bring it up to speedAntonrojo 20:14, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

text: Actually, the census block is one level lower than the census block group. Sjakkalle (Check!) 14:17, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Adding heirarchy of Census elements

message: The Globalize tag has been on this page since 2009.  Are Census Tracts used in countries other than the United States?  If not, Globalize is not appropriate.  Andrew327 22:44, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Globalize 
Talk:Asháninka

message: The following section needs attribution to maintain editorial balance. As written, it is opinion, particularly the items noted.
Religious missionary groups are intent on changing Ashaninka culture and belief systems, and some other groups who are exploiting problems within the communities became worse as a direct result of the violent upheavals of the communities over a decade ago. Some Conservation programs in the area have also been less than fair to the Ashaninka, in their move to create Conservation zones in this "important ecologically diverse area" choosing plants and animals over the Indigenous rights, and it remains to be seen if this will pose a threat to their lives and land in the future.
Lkensok (talk) 18:16, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Attribution Concern

message: I don't understand why the section called "threads" bares that name.  What does it have to do with thread? --Descendall 14:14, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Threads

message: The Asháninka or Asháninca (also called "Campa" or "Kampa") are an indigenous people of eastern Perú and western Brazil.
The name generally refers to a people who live in an area that spans parts of the southwest Amazon Rainforest along the Apúrimac, Ene, Perené, Tambo rivers and tributaries along the Cordillera Occidental of the Andes
PLEASE NOTE:   Campa or Kampa  is seen as a derogatory slur by the Ashaninka, it is a name given to them by outsiders, meaning literally to camp by the river, however the connotation is dirty, lazy, stupid, primitive, good for nothing,  etc. etc.  I cannot edit this on the main page as there is no option for it.
Wold appreciate someone doing this.
Their ancestral lands are in the forests of Junin, Pasco, Huanuco and part of Ucayali.
::In the book by L. Clark they are called Kampa without any form of disparagement, so you should please bring references for the Kampas themselves seeing it as derogatory. And please sign your posts. Thank you 2003:F5:6F0C:9500:EDA3:F288:99DF:9A6C (talk) 13:54, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  ASHANINKA vs. CAMPA 
Talk:Patrick Woodroffe

message: ÍSomeone needs to write this article. Woodroffe is a good artist. I dont know enough about him to write a decent article worty of his name. PJB 14:25, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Doing Difference

message: Propose this page be merged with Social categories, to be created. Meclee (talk) 23:58, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: If it is merged to a new article, how would that be different from moving it to the new title? Do you propose to merge other material, such as the new article Doing gender, based on the work of the same writers? Is there a better merge target? How about Gender role as a target for merger of this and related article which may be created in the future?  Edison (talk) 20:45, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed Merger
Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Czech)

message: This proposed guideline cuts across a lot of project areas and other guidelines. I strongly object to it becoming a guideline without consensus to do so. I see no indication there that there is a widespread community consensus on this issue. I think you need to advertise this widely and run a strawpoll before you change it into a guideline --Philip Baird Shearer 10:16, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Before this can be put up as a guideline it would surely be a good idea it there was shown to be some sort of a consensus for it. That's more or less what the text of the guideline template says. The style of the text is also not very good, and it seems odd that hockey players alone are left out. Of course from looking around on Wikipedia it seems clear that it describes the current situation, more or less, but this may not have received a lot of discussion. Perhaps a way forward would be to design a header template which somehow expressed this. Stefán Ingi 14:18, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Move up to Naming Convention
Talk:Tennin

message: Just merged tennyo into this article. — BrianSmithson 19:06, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Please clarify whether Tennyo are all-female Tennin, or Tennin are all-female Tennyo. The current wording is confusing. 2601:441:467F:9E00:0:0:0:3D91 (talk) 02:46, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tennin/Tennyo 
Talk:Early New High German

message: ENHG does appear to be used more frequently, I stand corrected. dab (ᛏ) 14:40, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

message: 'Diphthongisation of the long high vowels î, û and iu ([yː])' - Can anyone tell me what the long vowel [yː] became in NHG?--86.139.142.19 (talk) 12:53, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: It became the vowel now spelled "eu" or "äu". CodeCat (talk) 13:25, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks very much! Were there any intermediate stages?--86.139.142.19 (talk) 13:32, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Phonetically, there might well have been an intermediate stage, but nothing that is reflected in the spelling, and therefore no intermediate phonological stage, as far as I am aware. --Pfold (talk) 16:28, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: /y:/ diphthongisation

message: Shouldn't the syncope of final 'e' be mentioned here somewhere? It's very evident, for instance, in the Fortunatus text and also a key different between Early Modern and Modern German, which has restored most of the syncopated e's, e.g. in the standard plural forms of words like Fuß, Stadt (ENHG Füß, Städt vs. NHG Füße, Städte). I don't see any examples in the Luther text, but I know from experience that it's very common in his German as well.
At the moment the article doesn't really explain what difference there is between Modern and Early Modern German. All of the changes describes essentially serparate NHG from MHG, but not ENHG from NHG. Information on that would be helpful to readers.--Ermenrich (talk) 17:10, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the reason that ENHG>NHG is difficult is that NHG has essentially selected from among the features of ENHG rather than actually transforming them, so overall it's a statistical difference. But I agree that the article would be improved if we could describe tthe main areas of change succinctly. On the other hand, it could be argued that that really belongs in the New High German article with the work of the grammarians and lexicographers. More detail here on the influence of the two chanceries — on each other, in particular — might start to address it here. --Pfold (talk) 19:18, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

text: You must consider that there were many words in Middle High German and Early New High German which had an endless plural in nominative and accusative case. (Genitive with "-e" and dative with "-en") Those words took "-e" or "-er" as endings in New High German. 2A0A:A541:1C58:0:8052:B6E2:5747:34F0 (talk) 01:57, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Final vowel syncope
Talk:Welch

message: Argh! I was fixing links to the Welsh disambiguation page and looked here. It's gigantic! Does it honestly need every person with the surname Welch? I thought the idea of a disambiguation page was that if someone typed an ambiguous string into the search box, they would be given relevant links. (Do people really try to find Laura Bush by typing in "Welch", incidentally?) Not to list every person with the surname. At the very least, might it not be better to move the company up beyond the people and place names?
Would it be possible to trim this page somehow? I am planning to have a go, but since someone has obviously spent some time alphabeticising and so on, I don't want to trash their work totally. Any thoughts on how to make this page more readable, before I start?
--Telsa ((t)(c)) 14:45, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation page or directory?
Talk:Water Act 1973

message: This is best I can do for moment.  I've looked closely at a map of the areas and compared them closely with the Ouse/Trent watersheds, and I think I am warranted they are based on watersheds.  I've emailed OFWAT if they can supply more data.  I think the list of actual areas would be in the Act itself.  Morwen - Talk 14:50, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Mel Plaut

message: I have semi-protected the article for a few days to deal with a spat of vandalism. If I forget to unprotect it, drop me a note on my talk page and I'll take care of it. --Improv 02:24, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected 

message: saw your edit abut current name. Worth filing WP:RM to discuss?       StarM 15:54, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: , I'm not sure what you mean. I have made no such edit on this page. My only stake here was de-orphaning the article.  Mbdfar (talk) 16:07, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: My fault, I read the diffs wrong. Apologies for confusion.       StarM 16:10, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should the page be moved?
Talk:Two-level scheduling

message: Regarding the "Linux" section:
It may be that there should be a notation as to why a modern OS does not use this concept, but without that notation, simply noting the fact that a particular modern OS does not use this concept is pointless. If someone wishes to make an edit which explains why a modern OS (perhaps using generic terms) would choose not to do this, that's one thing. Simply saying "This particular OS doesnt use this" and not giving any reason.. well I could take all day to do some research and list a bunch of OSs which don't use this method, it still wouldnt be relevent to the article. This scheduling method also isn't employed by army ants, should we link to army ants as well? Vstarre 15:02, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Texas A&M University School of Veterinary Medicine & Biomedical Sciences

message: :The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was move. —Nightstallion (?) 22:05, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This sounds more like an advertisement than a factual summary. I'll tag the main page, and hopefully clean it up later when I'm working on the veterinary school articles. --biriwilg 22:47, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: Not clear that the graduate school of biomedical sciences is independently notable as opposed to the larger college it is a part of. Barkeep49 (talk) 19:43, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[:Texas A&M Health Science Center Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences]] into [[:Texas A&M College of Veterinary Medicine & Biomedical Sciences]]
Talk:Joseph Blanchard

message: Why is the 1761 map relevant?  In order to make it so you can't simply ignore this question, I've deleted the reference until it can be found substantial to the article. Mercer5089 01:13, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is relevent because he and Samual Langdon made it. At the time it was one of the most accurate maps of the state. Marc29th 11:56, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Question
Talk:Barbara Enright

message: Hmm... Wikidata has her birthdate, so it should automatically be here? Or WTF? 193.210.194.192 (talk) 11:33, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Talk:-ase

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot 02:36, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-10-13 Automated pywikipediabot message 

message: This suffix was comes from the greek word ἄσις Greek διαστασις, which means slime or mud, due to the way that an enzymes attaches itself to the substance it is helping break down.
i doubt this etymology. διάστασις means "separation" = διά + στάσις. the use in modern biochemistry comes from émile duclaux, who proposed ending -ase to form terms for enzymes coming from his own word coinage - term diastase (< diastasis) for sugar cleaving enzymes in traité de microbiologie, vol. 2, 1899, pp. 9.
Regis (talk) 08:23, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  doubts 

message: THIS IS NOT TRUE ENZYMES DONT END WITH ASE 99.155.146.101 (talk) 23:34, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  ASE ENZYMES
Talk:British Interplanetary Society

message: According to "www.liv.ac.uk/~ggastro/Society.news.Oct98.html" the exact date of foundation of the BIS shoul be 13.10.33
----
I believe the history section is wrong with respect to liquid-fueled rockets being forbidden by the Explosives Act 1875. If I recall correctly, it forbids making your own solid (fuel ready-mixed with oxidiser) rocket fuel as it counts as an explosive. Regardless, this section should cite sources (and perhaps the explosives act link should have a page too), even if I am incorrect.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.3.15.104 (talk) 19:02, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:X-COM: Interceptor

message: I did a little work to remove the in-universe styling of the story. I believe it is of sufficient standard to remove the tag. --Mouse Nightshirt 18:18, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed in-universe tag 

message: I feel it should be noted that there's a working fix floating about (see here) for the alien probe problem, although I'm not sure where it came from so I'm not sure where specifically to post a citation link to. 90.30.144.228 (talk) 02:26, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  XP/Vista/7 probe bug fix 
Talk:César Delgado

message: Delgado's transfer to Olympique Lyonnais is a done deal. Both Cruz Azul and Lyon announced they have reached to an agreement. Delgado is expected to cost around 8 mio euros.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Goldimit (talk • contribs) 10:05, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transfer to Europe 
Talk:Ward Melville High School

message: Am I the only one that thinks that this "corriculum highlights" is terrible... ? Hithisishal 06:50, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Please re-format ("Wikify") this high school's page as per Wikipedia's Guide to Layout and Manual of Style. A good reference, including examples on how to cite information, is the Fayetteville-Manlius Central School District page. Please remember that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, therefore all articles must be formatted as such. Shoughto 06:44, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Re-formatting

message: I hated sticking the copyright template on this page, but it seems to me that almost the entire page is taken directly from the school's website.  Maybe we can not delete it, but just reword it?  I think that it has some valuable information on it, but I think that the school's website is copyrighted, as it has a copyright symbol in the footer of the page.  The page also has a few sprawling lists that aren't really useful to the reader.  The page needs work.  --Sbrools (talk . contribs) 19:52, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright 

message: FYI, I did a big cleanup of the article and added numerous references to many of the originally unsourced statements.  There are a few left, so I tagged them with a citation needed tag.  Hopefully I or others can find sources for those statements in the near future.  —Umofomia 06:03, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleaned up and added references 

message: * Marc Soblick (class of 2000) - Director of Revenue and Guest Services for Holiday Inn Hotels (holidayinn.com). 
I removed this alumnus from the list because he has been listed under several highly questionable means; not to mention, he does not have an article about him, which usually means he does not meet notability requirements for inclusion.  If someone has a citation to confirm that this person did in fact graduate from this school (not just that he works for Holiday Inn), please re-add it. LonelyBeacon (talk) 06:31, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Dubious Alumnus
Talk:Hellraiser: Inferno

message: This could use some expansion...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.17.162.35 (talk) 18:17, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot

message: "Others praised the movie for relying on psychological terror and not relying overtly on consistent gore and the presence of Pinhead (Doug Bradley), instead the character acting as a demonic morale judge"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.232.225.2 (talk) 20:58, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: What the hell is a "demonic morale judge"?
Talk:Hellraiser: Hellseeker

message: https://bloody-disgusting.com/editorials/3631499/writer-michael-lent-details-original-vision-hellraiser-v-hellseeker-phantom-limbs/ Darkknight2149 22:22, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: It didn't seem like anyone else was going to do anytime soon, it so I took a stab at it. It was difficult to write a concise summary but I tried to write a bit about about the Michael Lent script and something is better than nothing right? Feel free to mercilessly rewrite it. -- 109.79.72.156 (talk) 22:12, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original plan (development)