lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:1. FC Kaiserslautern

message: What's the 1. mean? Awiseman 19:03, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: First or "Erster" in German. It's in common usage among German football clubs. Wiggy! 19:53, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Ah, thanks. Is it supposed to mean they're the best, or they were the first team in Kaiserslautern, or what? Awiseman 20:09, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Some of both, but most often from the first club in the city. Wiggy! 00:57, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting, thanks! Awiseman 16:45, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Yesterday the former coach Wolfgang Wolf was fired!There's no new coach yet.
Maybe somebody could change that in the article.Thx217.86.48.145 11:12, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Coach! 

message: Our logo was not changed.. this is only the "Traditionslogo 1955-1969". It is on our shirts & some other merchandise, but only this season! It is for 110 years of the club & the forthcoming 90th birthday of Fritz Walter on 31 October 2010.
References: fckforum.de (the gray field "Zitat")
best regards from Kaiserslautern El Che 21:15, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: For whatever reasons, in fact the official logo changed. It's not just for the shirts and it's not even sure if it's only for one season. Redhair23 (talk) 16:07, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo 2010/2011 

message: The redirect 2023–24 1. FC Kaiserslautern season has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Steel1943 (talk) 19:14, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:2023–24 1. FC Kaiserslautern season]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Little Italy

message: I thought it was a bit strange that the first list isn't in alphabetical order.
Should be Canada then the republic of Ireland then the UK then US.(86.156.207.116 (talk) 17:01, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Ordering

message: There are about 360 pages that link to Little Italy. Many of them should link to a more specific page, such as Little Italy, Manhattan. I have fixed five pages: Frederick Douglass, Sammy Gravano, Lou Duva, Steve Buscemi, and Steve Marriott. There are many more. Go to Special:WhatLinksHere/Little_Italy and start fixing! —Anomalocaris (talk) 17:39, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguate 

message: The article currently uses the plural form "Little Italys". There is no style guide I can find that is of any use here, but would it not be more in line with the general grammatical rules of the English language to write "Little Italies"? To me, "Italys" is a rather awkward spelling. I also notice that there is a book that has been discussed in an NPR article with the word "Italies" in the title (). If anyone actually sees this, please share your thoughts. An anonymous username, not my real name 14:57, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plural form
Talk:Florida State Road 11

message: Sorry about the tagging, folks, but one sentence does not a Wikipedia article make.  B.Wind 19:07, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: True...but that's why it's a stub. If it wasn't a stub, the proper tag would be "expand", not "cleanup" - but IIRC for a stub-tagged article the expand tag is considered redundant... - Aerobird 01:27, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed the cleanup tag. As Aerobird points out, the article is already tagged as a stub. As the one sentence is well-formed, the cleanup tag was inappropriate. Doonhamer 01:31, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It may still be a stub now, but at least it's no longer one sentence... or even two. ----DanTD (talk) 13:54, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Neoplatonism and Gnosticism

message: Excellent! Flonight had kinda already suggested that. It was just a matter of getting the conclusion part some peer review and then wording it properly which if you visit the article you can see I struggle with and have been stating all along. LoveMonkey 11:48, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: L, see your msg board for my response (sorry, forgot to sign it). Some of your questions are too personal for this forum. Yes, it's people I meet in neoplatonic and other circles that make life interesting and philosophy exciting for me.  Keep in mind that people who teach full time and who are constantly asked to write and speak at conferences are busy people! Dillon is funny and witty to a fault - I think of him as the "Denny Crane" (William Shatner character on Boston Legal) of ancient philosophy.  When you're that good, there is a danger of enjoying the attention too much, and of not recognizing legitimate counterarguments.  Zeusnoos 15:40, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Pantalettes

message: I doubt they originated in the 1820s -- this illustration doesn't really seem to be from the 1820's: :commons:Image:Confectioners-pantalettes-1810s-woodcut.png Churchh 19:10, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right, definitely pre-1820s!  And while we're talking, do you have a source that can confirm that ladies wore trousers or sturdy pantalettes under the petticoats of riding habits?  I can't find a reliable source. - PKM 02:40, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I really don't know, but theoretically, I imagine it might sometimes save embarassment, since women kind of had to lift and carry part of the outer skirts of the habit to be able to walk any distance.   Churchh 07:56, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Dating
Talk:State Road 14 Truck (Florida)

message: #REDIRECT Talk:Florida State Road 14 Truck
Sorry about the tags, but we have a one-sentence article about what is essentially a spur of SR 14.  I'd recommend a merger of the two articles (and a redirect from here) as I'm not sure if this article would survive a AfD vote as is.  B.Wind 19:14, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Clock Tower II: The Struggle Within

message: Was his ever released in Europe or Australia? If it indeed was, then could someone add the release date to the article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.167.190.140 (talk) 11:21, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: PAL version

message: There were several spoilers that added nothing to the article (such as "the player can choose to save her or let her die") that I removed.  Yes, the page has a spoiler warning, but there's no need to spoil every last bit of the story. Kat, Queen of Typos 21:18, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Gratuitous Spoilers

message: There's an easter egg/reference in the game where Aunt Katherine can be viewed by looking through the window screen "Hittin' it to some offspring" this is a reference where in the first game Janet can be seen having sexual intercourse with Billy Mays While the Offspring's song "self esteem" plays in the background. anyone want to add this in?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.107.179.108 (talk) 10:23, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: easter eggs

message: Can someone add a citation linking to a first-party source that asserts this theory? I'm a big fan of the series and never heard of this before tonight.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.237.199.51 (talk) 08:03, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Alyssa and Bates as a reincarnated Dan and Bobby
Talk:The ClueFinders 5th Grade Adventures: The Secret of the Living Volcano

message: I use to have this game and I can remember at some point, the volcano erupts, but after that happens and when your in the middle of the faces within the faces challenge, it shows the waterfall in that stringy or stick-like wall, the music is muted and I think there's something extra but I don't properly remember that, as for the fishes within the fish, I think either they consider it the wrong cryptiles or it doesn't accept them at all --Wikistonecolddragon (talk) 20:50, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Glitch?
Category talk:American Old West gunfights

message: This isn't really an appropriate category name.  "Famous" is redundant, because if it isn't famous, it should have an article in the first place.  "Wild West" is kind of hard to pin down--what counts as Wild West?  
I've placed this category in the parent category :Category:Dueling, but that category isn't very big...maybe these entries could be absorbed into that one?  I'm not sure, I'd like to discuss it a little before putting it up for renaming or merging. NickelShoe (Talk) 19:20, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I meant that :Category:Dueling is small, so maybe it could be filled up with these entries instead of being a subcat.  If you have a definition of Wild West, it should go on the main page so that there's set criteria.  (Remember, it's not just time but also location.  Certainly 1860 in India wouldn't count.) NickelShoe (Talk) 03:58, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename?  Merge?

message: This category was renamed from :Category:Famous Wild West gunfights: see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2007 April 23#Category:Famous Wild West gunfights. Sam Blacketer 13:40, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Category renamed
Talk:Conker's Pocket Tales

message: What are all the reasons why the Conker franchise was abandoned, though the Banjo-Kazooie franchise still exists? --PJ Pete
No,it's not abandoned. They meant Conker's Quest/Twelve Tales was abandoned. Rare was fed up of the complaints that this would be another Banjo-Kazookie(though,it seems more Spyroish to me).
I don't think Conker was meant to be a series anyway..Or maybe they're thinking of creating more games But,anyway,they meant the beta games 
They aint making any more games of that sort, they made conker's bad fur day wich was originaly 12 tales, but got revamped, and that was ported and changed a bit but still the same thing realy. Aparently they aint making a sequel to that either :( Lord loss210 (talk) 15:23, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abandonment 

message: Will there ever be another family-friendly game in the series? It would be really nice if that were the case.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.56.16.164 (talk) 19:46, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another family friendly game should be made. 
Talk:Croc 2

message: Is the 1998 version mentioned a public commercial release or just a beta/prelease only available to a small number of people? If it isn't, I don't know that listing all those differences in such detail is truly noteworthy and it might be verging on fancruft... 72.240.184.75 (talk) 22:51, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I was just about to post the same information. Considering 1998 is before the release dates of any version shown in the main Infobox for the page I am assuming this was a beta version. Some clarity would be nice! 86.164.129.87 (talk) 17:28, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Differences? 

message: Someone might to detach this article? Expanding the content. I think, that this might to be difficult. But, why not try? Who knows. A lo mejor. Quien sabe. Maybe, the article to becoming good. Eduardo P (talk) 22:31, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestion
Talk:Psalms of Solomon

message: I'm going to insist on a reference for the assertion in this article that the PssSol are considered canonical by the Orthodox. While they may indeed be found in some mss of the LXX, they are not in fact canonical that I have every heard about. So-- Who sez? TCC (talk) (contribs) 19:26, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You needn't insist, a request should be sufficient, better yet edit it as you see fit.  The offending sentence was inserted by an anonymous editor who only made edits on one day in September 2005, unless he/she later registered.  There are two possibilities for misinterpretation that I can see.  The other editor may have confused Psalms of Solomon with Wisdom of Solomon or Odes of Solomon, and the article only says the book is accepted, not canonical, which I view as different, although I can see why to some readers it may imply being in the canon.   If you are familiar with the Orthodox position, please correct the record.  --Blainster 20:35, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't want to cut it if there's information somewhere that supports it, improbable as that might seem in my opinion. I've had trouble recently with editors who come in like gangbusters and make massive (and from my POV, highly dubious) changes without any discussion, and it's been driving me nuts. So as to avoid doing the same thing, I wanted to give whoever put the information in the opportunity to defend it before I did anything with it. TCC (talk) (contribs) 20:44, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Just about totally disputed

message: I removed the recent anon. assertion that P of S is part of the Greek canon. The Oxford Annotated NRSV Bible states that the Greek Orthodox church uses the Catholic deuterocanonical books plus 1 Esdras, Psalm 151, the Prayer of Manasseh, and 3 Maccabees (4 Maccabees is in the appendix but not considered canonical). The online Encyclopedia Britannica states that the P of S is not part of any scriptural canon.  This agrees with the position of editor TCC. A change will require good sources.  --Blainster 20:00, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: More on Greek Orthodox canon
Talk:Kim Larsen

message: "Kim Larsen" is listed as a band member on Bathory (band) and as an associated act on Quorthon. Seems like somebody made a joke and it went unnoticed, so here I am acknowledging it, because it sucks to have nobody notice your joke. 46.39.230.148 (talk) 13:53, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Relation to Bathory/Quorthon

message: Why does gasolin redirect to Kim Larsen. That doesn't make sence to me. Kim Larsen is the lead singer in the band gasolin. They are not the same. Anyone that has ligitimate reasons for this? Else I will change it.
Torben.green says:
Please do
Smoking bans are not solely to protect non-smokers though, are they.
If that was the case, the legislation would allow for the setting up of bars, restuarants or other public places that could be designated as "Smokers Only".  A key facet of the ban was to make smoking so difficult in public (because smokers cannot find a place to do it, or because it is so inconvenient or whatever) that they simply give up.  It is, therefore, societal conditioning, rather than a pragmatic measure to solve a problem.  That was the point that Larsen was making, rather obviously.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.86.95.41 (talk) 22:58, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is there more than one Kim Larsen releasing music and is this the one that released Solanaceae?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:C429:76B0:DD1:1376:9EAD:6204 (talk) 01:32, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this Kim Larsen the same Kim Larsen that released Solanaceae?  
Talk:Florida State Road 16

message: Sorry about the tag, folks, but it seems that this article is in need of expansion as two sentences do not a Wikipedia article make.  B.Wind 19:27, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Changed the cleanup tag to the more appropriate expansion tag. Doonhamer 01:43, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe this should at least be Start class now. ---------User:DanTD (talk)  14:32, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Talk:Isfield

message: I don't see why my article should be deleted really, as it is a 'special' pub, for the fact that it is immediately adjacent to the Lavender Line, a page in Wikipedia.
* Which article? But is it notable? -- RHaworth 09:46, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

message: I have rewritten this article in accordance with  the Wikipedia notes on writing about settlements. The notes are very useful for editors, since they lay out all the headings which might be used and thereby bring information to mind which might not otherwise occur: examples being education and churches; and, most importantly, sections specifically head history and geography. 
A couple of comments on what was there:
* the sweeping statement about Normans and others: I cannot find anything to back that up, although I've no doubt there is something somewhere. Whatever, the statement should have a reference
* the tidal section of the Ouse finishes at Barcombe Mills (several Google searches confirm that); small boats were able to use the river no doubt.  Peter Shearan (talk) 14:24, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite of article
Talk:Florida State Road 21

message: Sorry about the tag, folks, but one sentence does not a Wikipedia article make.  Certainly there is more that could be said about SR 21. B.Wind 19:30, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

message: Evidently, there were editors who wondered why there were County Road 21s north of the norther terminus of this route. Well, according to the University of Florida's map collection, they were associated with the route Florida State Road 111 was part of it. ---------User:DanTD (talk)  14:24, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Former northern extension and more suffixed routes in Duval County
Talk:Odes of Solomon

message: Please provide a cite that this entire collection is accepted as canonical by the Orthodox. To my knowledge it is not, with the exception of the Prayer of Manasseh, even if it is included in some mss of the LXX. TCC (talk) (contribs) 19:32, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Orthodox?

message: I believe this article is confusing at times Odes of Solomon with the Book of Odes (Bible). I myself do not exactly know the difference between the two. But one seems to be a book included in the LXX that contains ~14 famous biblical hymns, and the other is a 2nd century CE book of about 42 odes. I hope someone can clear this up.--Andrew c 00:43, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The material boldly connecting the Odes of Solomon with LXX has been added recently by User:Clinkophonist, who may have other texts with "Solomon" in the title in mind.... --Wetman 06:41, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I will be removing the references to the Septuagint unless someone can find evidence that the Odes of Solomon were in there. I have looked for such evidence and have found none. Yahnatan 15:43, 13 May 2006 (UTC
I do not understand why this article is linked to King Solomon of the OT. The odes are by a different Solomon. The link to King Solomon should not be there. KB  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.251.113.215 (talk) 01:09, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  disputed 

message: The comment that the Odes are "surprisingly" evangelical are not accurate. The footnote lists Odes 6 and 10.3 to support this statement. It is a stretch to say Ode 6 has anything to do with telling others about the gospel as much as how the gospel affects individuals internally. Ode 10 is written from the perspective of Jesus talking about “God His Father.” It is Jesus who says “to convert the lives of those who desire to come to Him and to lead those who are captive into freedom,” it is not an individual disciple of Christ. It is Jesus after all according to scripture, who came to set the captives free. Despite what many call the "Great Commission," besides the original apostles who received the commission, history records a lack of emphasis on evangelism in the early Church. In keeping with that period of time, the Odes also do not appear to be evangelical in nature. Read them carefully for yourself and see.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Huladawg (talk • contribs) 19:52, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Evangelism
Talk:Florida State Road 40

message: Sorry, folks, but two sentences do not a Wikipedia article make.  What more can be said about SR 40? B.Wind 19:37, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: How do you like it now? ----DanTD (talk) 14:20, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion

message: I haven't found much on the history of the road, but some old maps and aerial photos at Historic Aerials Online confirms that Butler Road and Front Street in Astor, Florida used to be part of SR 40. They don't cover an exact date for the realignment there, but I'm assuming it might've had something to do with the replacement of the Astor Bridge. Also, since none of them cover anything in Lynne, Florida before 1969, I can't tell if Northeast 10th Street Road used to be part of SR 40 or not. ---------User:DanTD (talk)  12:09, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A little extra history
Talk:The Romantics

message: Does the lead singer have a lisp? Or is that my imagination? tharsaile (talk) 14:10, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lisp? 

message: Rich Farmbrough, 03:22, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: In Our Time

message: Why, what, where, and how does this article need additional citations for verification? Hyacinth (talk) 18:16, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional citations
Talk:List of Australian state and territory slogans

message: Maybe this should be RDRed to Australian vehicle number plates.pfctdayelise (translate?) 08:16, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

message: I am about to delete from the article history those revisions whose content and/or edit summaries libel Xtra, per Wikipedia's libel policy. Selective deletion requires full deletion followed by selective restoration. Therefore this article will be deleted for a very brief period of time. Snottygobble 04:00, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Selective deletion
Talk:4-Methylthioamphetamine

message: Page needs wikid amount of cleanup/rewrite.
Miserlou 19:43, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "but even more dangerous"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.135.78.201 (talk) 09:12, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  npov
Talk:Florida State Road 47

message: *Sorry about the tag, but two sentences do not a Wikipedia article make.  What more could be said about SR 47?  B.Wind 19:44, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Bond measure

message: I think this article would be better served as a redirect to Bond (fiance) with a section entitled  Bond Measure included.
Amiaheroyet (talk) 14:35, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Merging this w the general "bond - finance" is both a good idea, and a bad idea.
Good, technically they are the same thing.
Bad, the reality is government and private are never the same thing.
Aaaronsmith (talk) 18:10, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Government bond vs private bond
Talk:Poklonnaya Hill

message: I read sometime ago that the biggest aquarium of the world was to be built on Poklonnaya Hill. Does anyone know something new about it?.
Nope, sorry. Just a remark though - tanks are also vehicles!92.227.204.238 (talk) 12:50, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Bonjour Boulacharaa (talk) 11:16, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merci 

message: article says 
>Its two summits used to be separated by the Setun River
but Russian version says they were separated by some gully running north-south, as depicted on this old topo map http://retromap.ru/051952_55.734564,37.514190&leftmain_ov=57&leftback_ov=71 , and first of summits already was razed in 1950s Linefeed (talk) 19:03, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  summits
Talk:Lex Feltham

message: This should probably be deleted, as it is a (poorly disguised) vanity page. --70.251.135.123 19:53, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Strong agree vanity, not notable, unencyclopaedic. DuncanHill 10:49, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have reverted the page to an earlier version devoid of the POV, vanity and nonsense, but will keep an eye on it for vandalism. DuncanHill 10:54, 10 October 2006 (UTC)