Talk:Wars of Alexander the Great

message: I have been making some major changes to this article. It is surprising that this article was blank for so long. RomanHistorian (talk) 03:34, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I removed the adoptee-category. But it seems like a few more are also displaced:
 
:Category:Ancient Macedonian generals
:Category:Ancient Pellaeans
:Category:Cause of death disputed
:Category:City founders
:Category:Hellenistic individuals
:Category:Macedonian monarchs
:Category:Monarchs of Persia
:Category:Mummies
:Category:People from Central Macedonia
:Category:Pharaohs of the Argead dynasty
- Mr. Hill (talk) 12:43, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categories 

message: No references whatsoever, it looks like all that is in that section with the exception of the first paragraph is more of a romanticized, made up account of the end of Alexander's campaign. Reading that section was like reading a novel based on Alexander's life... 99.231.26.15 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 21:19, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: The end of the war section needs revamping asap

message: Alexander during his conquest barely entered India proper. They were limited to Pakistan. As pakistan didnt existed tht time so in historical prospective its more appropriate to say indian subcontinent rather then just india which gives wrong meanings to a reader more over it may sound correct historically (as it means a region east of indus river) but under modern regional contexts it may misguide a reader.
Any thoughts ??
الله أكبرMohammad Adil 19:19, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think it's much of a problem saying India as the area was part of India at the time (at least that's my understanding, but I'd have to check), but "Indian subcontinent" would make an acceptable alternative in my opinion to avoid confusing the reader. Nev1 (talk) 19:25, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  India or indian subcontinent. 

message: It seems to me like much of this article is mere speculation or fanciful imagination. Many sections lack even ONE citation, and contain phrases like "The Persians, who were never known for strategy but instead usually relied on sheer numbers, appeared to take the Macedonian threat too lightly early in the war. Alexander believed Darius, who was known to surround himself with eunuchs and concubines, to be a weak man." Where is the source of this information? Did Alexander really believe that? Who says the Persians were never known for military strategy? Who can verify these claims?
This article desperately needs attention.
Dacicus Parthicus (talk) 03:22, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Completely agreed. The article as it is focuses way too much on Alexander - the Persian strategy was always to redirect the war elsewhere to other fronts (compare with the Trachenberg Plan and Napoleon.) E.g. they sponsored revolts in Greece (most notably at Megalopolis - the most hard-fought battle of the war); an attempt to raise Athens and Chalkis in revolt failed when the Greek mercenary admiral died beforehand; after Issus the surviving Persian commanders attempted to recover Asia Minor but were defeated by Antigonus the one-eyed in three battles we know almost nothing about. None of these are mentioned in the article. Plus, much detail (e.g. campaigns in Sogdiana/Bactria, the Battle of Jaxartes, hardships in the Gedrosian desert, etc.) are glossed over or simply ignored. Seleucus (talk) 18:16, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where are the sources? 

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests December 2011 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 13:28, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:BattleofIssus333BC-mosaic-detail1.jpg Nominated for Deletion

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Wars of Alexander the Great. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081013062143/http://www.ac.wwu.edu:80/~stephan/Renault/boy.mp.html to http://www.ac.wwu.edu/~stephan/Renault/boy.mp.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:38, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Shouldn't "Parthenon" have a link to the Parthenon wiki page?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Svoboman (talk • contribs) 01:48, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page Links 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Wars of Alexander the Great. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20052621324300/http://www.isidore-of-seville.com/Alexanderama.html to http://www.isidore-of-seville.com/Alexanderama.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080615021840/http://www.ac.wwu.edu/~stephan/Animation/alexander.html to http://www.ac.wwu.edu/~stephan/Animation/alexander.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:54, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: It just discusses the death of Darius 2601:184:4780:174D:80F5:776:BC08:607F (talk) 03:05, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subsection on Bactria doesn't actually talk about Bactria 

message: it's time!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stavfrombc (talk • contribs) 15:57, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  May i pls change BC to BCE? 

message: The picture refer to alexander is the Mithra god of light how it is possible there is no sculpture of great Conqueror in a culture the made sculptor from everything.
According to history he ruled from 336 B.C to 323 B.C which means 13 years in total and they tell he defeated Darrius III in three battels from 333 to 330 in three years he reached to Persepolis. But For traveling from Macedonia to iran needed 1 years how Alexander conquer and reach to iran in 3 years with all the fight he has and he need a heavy tools war such as battering ram.
In story tells Alexander set fire all the Persepolis how again in history Persian used them if somebody reconstruct that why there is not a name of him in history just who made it various the great and Xerxes.
the Persepolis constructed with Calcite CaCO₃ (Most types of wood will start combusting at about 300 degrees Celsius. The gases burn and increase the temperature of the wood to about 600 degrees Celsius (1,112 degrees Fahrenheit). When the wood has released all its gases, it leaves charcoal and ashes. Charcoal burns at temperatures exceeding 1,100 degrees Celsius) so what is happening hear
CaCO3(s) → CaO(s) + CO2(g) Decomposition of limestone to calcium oxide (quicklime) and carbon dioxide on heating.] one is gas another is washable how Persepolis could be in fire still we have it. 
They could not supply their logistics. Ariobarzane story is the copy of Termopil war. and how they can defeat Persian Immortals was the name given by Herodotus. because the Xerxes set in fire the Aten The western writer made the Alexander story Sohail123456 (talk) 13:08, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alexander The Great is the biggest liar 

message: Make it detailed 124.253.130.40 (talk) 05:09, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alexander's wars 

message: Result Nickolas VL (talk) 11:00, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  It wasn't just the Macedonians in the expedition of Alexander the Great. It was also the rest of the Greeks under his leadership except for the Spartans. As Alexander himself had said it was a Panhellenic war, that's why I put Greek instead of just Macedonian victory. Please don't change it again.