Talk:Origin of water on Earth

message: Please note that there is a stubby thing called Origin of the world's oceans, which the German article links to. I assume they should be merged. u p p l a n d 13:26, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: One very traditional way is that 
*#. Volcanoes erupted
*#. The Volcanoes made storms
*#. The Storms brought rain.
*#. It rained a lot,
*#. So much that it made oceans.
-- Sneaky Oviraptor18talk edits tribute 23:23, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If it's wrong, blame the public! . --Sneaky Oviraptor18talk edits tribute 23:23, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Traditional way 

message: this is a confusing topic!
If the calvin cycle article is correct, the cycle consumes, not produces water.
This is the van Niel equation that was discovered using purple sulfur bacteria, where the bacteria did not release Oxygen gas during their process of making carbohydrates. Check almost any college level Biology text--<ref: Biology by Jonathan Losos, Ken Mason and Susan Singer, 2008 McGraw-Hill>.
(RiverdaleBioGuy (talk) 22:00, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction with calvin cycle? 

message: This article appears to contradict the Formation and evolution of the Solar System article. It that article it states that "The inner Solar System, the region of the Solar System inside 4 AU, was too warm for volatile molecules like water and methane to condense, so the planetesimals that formed there could only form from compounds with high melting points, such as metals (like iron, nickel, and aluminium) and rocky silicates.". In this article, it seems to imply that the water was already present. 
99.241.217.164 (talk) 18:18, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: You can change it to make sense if you would like. A. Z. Colvin • Talk 20:28, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction with evolution of the solar system 

message: It doesn't surprise me, that this Wiki article doesn't mention a thing, about the 3 times the amount of Ocean water was discovered deep in the Earth's mantle, in June of 2014. http://www.livescience.com/46292-hidden-ocean-locked-in-earth-mantle.html
Also someone added a potentially 'unreliable source' link to the page: http://www.nature.com/news/earth-has-water-older-than-the-sun-1.16011
Zykodern (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 17:52, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Water in the Earth's mantle 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Origin of water on Earth. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050311220523/http://www.oceansonline.com/ocean_form.htm to http://www.oceansonline.com/ocean_form.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:49, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Why is there no mention of God in this article? God is a common explanation as to why Earth has lots of water, yet each time I've added such it has been reverted. 2602:306:3653:8440:D98E:54BC:EAC1:5A78 (talk) 22:12, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  God 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Origin of water on Earth. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151125185854/http://live.huffingtonpost.com/r/highlight/scientists-discover-where-earths-water-originated/564ba93d99ec6d09c3000126 to http://live.huffingtonpost.com/r/highlight/scientists-discover-where-earths-water-originated/564ba93d99ec6d09c3000126
*Added archive https://archive.is/20060621100255/http://wwwrses.anu.edu.au/admin/index.php?p=harrison to http://wwwrses.anu.edu.au/admin/index.php?p=harrison
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:40, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:52, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion 

message: Why is this not mentioned anywhere in the article? The Bible says that Earth always had water so if the Bible is correct there was never an origin of water on Earth. 172.58.171.122 (talk) 18:45, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The Bible is not a reliable source. Even if Earth "always had water", it would still have an origin because Earth must have come from somewhere. Saucy[talk – contribs] 01:12, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  According to the Bible Earth always had water 

message: Water in the world you tane Shara jibon ta ki na jo bhi hua hi friend love to see if you have time for the same you tane hat ta dhore amar mathata dhuke 114.31.174.0 (talk) 14:47, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Water 

message: The section “Geochemical analysis of water in the Solar System” states: 
“The deuterium to hydrogen ratio for ocean water on Earth is known very precisely to be (1.5576 ± 0.0005) × 10−4.”
While the source material supports this statement, wouldn’t it be more clear to reverse it to the hydrogen to deuterium ratio, which would be 6420 ± 2 just as precisely? Glenn L (talk) 05:19, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is hydrogen to deuterium ratio better? 

message: — Assignment last updated by LynSchwendy (talk) 03:29, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: EEB 4611-Biogeochemical Processes-Spring 2024