Talk:Inkheart

message: Are you sure we need to detailed plot summary?  We already have a plot summary.  That contains some themes and some personalities.  I'm sure it's been done through hard work, but do we need it?
SapphireSprite 05:09, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Detailed Plot Summary 

message: It's of the Advance Reader's edition. Can someone who has this book maybe scan in a normal copy? Thanks! Goyston talk, contribs, play 01:23, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cover image 

message: Why are there two articles in 1? The section talking about the Inkworld should belong in the Inkspell article.141.149.59.17 11:33, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2 Articles in 1 

message: Okay, I can't stand this. Shouldn't Elinor have an article? The Shadow has one, too? So, what should we do? I'm watchin' you,mon (talk) 00:34, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elinor Loredan 

message: I look at a lot of pages on books, and they all have a section on how well the book was received. This article doesn't seem to have one. Considering that it is now being released as a movie, shouldn't we see how well Inkheart did as a book?
--Skydude176 (talk) 02:00, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception? 

message: I apologize for putting up a discussion about the characters in Inkheart's talk page but the characters' talk pages all seem rather...dead. Anyways, I'm proposing a merge for all the character pages. They are all so short and devoid of good references that they can barely stand by themselves as separate articles. It would be much better to have one detailed, good character list instead of a bunch of choppy, short articles. And I don't think Cockerell is notable enough to have his own article. He is an extremely insignificant character! We also need to get more critical reception things for these characters. Please give me your opinions and input. If I see no objections I will go ahead and carry out the merge. Thank you, Swiftink (talk) 15:18, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attention! 

message: Is it worth mentioning that this is a self-referencing book, there is a book called Inkheart in the book called Inkheart, like Hitchiker's Guide to the Galaxy? --Matthew Bauer (talk) 17:00, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: When making a new discussion on a talk page, please add it to the bottom of the page, which can be automatically done by clicking on "new section" instead of "edit this page". Yes, I do think that would be worthwhile to add, preferably in the introductory section. Eugeniu Bmsg 17:30, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Self-referencing book 

message: Such an awful plot writeup. And is there any need for an excerpt from the book? So far as I can tell, very few wikipedia articles for books include excerpts. 216.41.16.82 (talk) 15:02, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I just removed the whole horrible shebang and left the summary per WP:PLOTSUMMARIZE. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 18:53, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: If anybody really needs the huge chapter summary thing, (The guy learning German for example) I went ahead and copy-pasted the relevent section here. I'll probably forget it is there and leave it up for well over a year.--Ejl389 (talk) 06:22, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot 

message: Substituted at 18:56, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment