Talk:People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals/Archive 6

message: I've decided to put up a NPOV tag due to the bias content of this article.
It needs to be rewritten into a neutral point of view. The critism should be seperate of that from the different parts of the article.
Kjones1985 16:59, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't help but to notice you're not giving any example whatsoever of bias. As for complaining about the criticism not having their own section, what has this to do with neutrality? The criticism is there where it's relevant and has nothing to do with the neutrality of the article. It would be a waste of time removing the tag, I suppose. Jean-Philippe 18:08, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

text: Please be more specific. What do you find biased? Why do you think the criticism should be seperate, even though our guidelines and Jimbo Wales advise otherwise? Also what do you mean by bias? Do you mean unbalanced? If so, this is not the same as POV.-Localzuk (talk) 18:25, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV Tag 

message: I tried to standardize the formatting of the references but it's still not complete. Any help is appreciated. Jared 00:55, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference Formatting 

message: Should there be a civilization reformatting/ending disaster, what would the "AR" people do ? Ever seen Mad Max 2: The Road Warrior ? The people will resume hunting, as they had to do in ancient times, to feed their families, and they will kill the AR people. In 20-30 years, a asteroid is scheduled to come by this planet, and there is a chance this rock will hit this planet. IF it hits, the current civilization will be terminated. Logic dictates that SURVIVAL will take precedence over Animal, Environmental rights. Martial Law 19:08, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not trying to offend anyone, just asking a legit question, no more, no less. There really is a asteroid on its way here and the chance exists that it may hit this planet. Martial Law 19:30, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Odds are, if the asteroid hits, virtually all people will be wiped out. The few remaining nearly extinct human specimens will be protected by the PR (People Rights) groups among the ruling animals. Crum375 19:36, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

text: You are talking a lot of ifs there... Of course human nature is to survive and that would preclude any concept of rights. However, the movement we discuss, when we talk about animal rights, is based on the current society and not a post apololyptic society such as those you speak of.-Localzuk (talk) 19:39, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: WHAT is going on ? Someone accidentally removed the "Cultural Influences" section, I re-instate it, only WP does NOT accept it, except in the history section. Martial Law 18:22, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yea, and all the references and external links are gone as well.L0b0t 18:29, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Sorted. Rockpocket 18:31, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Seen evidence of vandalisim and a edit war. That have anything to do with this malfunction ? Martial Law 18:34, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: WP NOT accepting edits ?