Talk:Ralph Cifaretto

message: This article suggests Ralph's inspiring Jackie to hold up the poker game, and subsequently run away/get shot was an accident. But Ralph chose to tell Jackie this story on the night Ralph had a game going. Ralph would have known that Jackie's fate would be in his hands if Jackie robbed Ralph's game. Then after it went ahead, Ralph just opted to have Jackie leave and never come back. This suggests to me that Ralph just wanted Jackie out of his life; he wanted to fuck Jackie's mother in peace and not put up with Jackie's disrespect and demands for backup in his smalltime x dealing, or Ralph may have realised that Jackie was thinking about jumping ship and sending his taste to Chris, who offered to be Jackie's captain in the pizza parlour (I like this theory, because why else would this scene have been written in by Chase, knowing that Jackie would be dead before he could take up the offer?). Finally, I reckon Ralph wanted Jackie gone but - at first - not necessarily dead. That's why he just left Jackie in the projects, Ralph would have been happy with that situation continuing, but had him killed just because Tony told him he had to make a decision, and the only alternative was giving Jackie a pass.
I dont think Ralph did it on purpose. Look at how he reacts after jackie robs the game and Ralph knows he has to make a decision, he seems genuinely bothered by it.
I loved Ralphie because he's the craziest fucking bastard to grace the series, I loved him being a loose cannon with all his gladiator shit, and after he beat that girl to death his reply to everything was 'she was a HOOAH! a HOOAH!' just saying that word 'whore' in such a ridiculously funny way slightly out of step with the rest of his accent. --86.141.51.41 12:06, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ralph wanted Jackie gone 

message: :Image:Ralphiesopranos.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:44, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Ralphiesopranos.jpg

message: :Image:Ralphiesopranos.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 03:56, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Ralphiesopranos.jpg

message: I don't understand exactly why Ralph himself isn't important enough to warrant a page, as opposed to other characters, like Richie Aprile or Jackie Aprile, both of whom have a weaker plot-relevance, little citations to assert their notability, and also a plot summary-type article. It's a discrepancy that makes little sense, and either a cleanup of those articles or the approval of this article would straighten that out.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by AnyGuy (talk • contribs) 02:59, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for adding some sources and making an effort to improve the article. No one is saying that Ralph "isn't important enough" to warrant a page. I'm sure the sources are out there. It's just that the content of your last restoration does meet the criteria for an individual character article. WP:GNG requires that a topic have received "significant coverage in reliable sources". Ralph is only mentioned casually in the sources you provided. That said, the articles in :Category:The Sopranos characters that I've looked at so far are just as undersourced, don't be surprised if they are eventually redirected for the same reason.— TAnthonyTalk 13:56, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect or Not