Talk:Hurricane Edith (1971)

message: I found a good radar image, but it's a PDF. Is there some way I can upload PDFs?
E. Brown, Hurricane enthusiast - Squawk Box 21:44, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: I lowered it to stub, seeing as there's only one sentence for impact. Hurricanehink (talk) 02:12, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow. It looks great now. It must be at least a start class. íslenskur fellibylur #12 (samtal) 12:38, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What more does it need for B class? Hurricanehink (talk) 16:15, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nothing. You were right to put it on GAN. I doubt any more pictures are available, so I'm not sure what else this could need. The person who reviews this on GAN might be able to help. --Coredesat 02:38, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Cool. Yea, there are some pictures in the newspaper archive, though all are copyrighted. Hurricanehink (talk) 02:42, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Class

message: Good job, as usual.  Two notes before it makes its inevitable FAC run:
# Consider getting a source on the last part, about it being one of four Cat 5's not to be retired.
# A few areas could use some minor cleanup in terms of prose.  It reads fine, but could use a copyeditor before you explore further promotion.
Congrats on another great hurricane article. --badlydrawnjeff talk 19:55, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it should instantly be upgraded to A-class. CrazyC83 21:06, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If Hink's record is any indication, this will be a FA in a month anyway. --badlydrawnjeff talk 23:20, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks :) Hurricanehink (talk) 23:29, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

text:  You were off by about two weeks... too early Titoxd(?!?) 20:15, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Pass

message: I think this is almost ready for WP:FAC personally. CrazyC83 01:41, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Would anyone opposed to me putting it up for FAC? I currently have Fabian up, so if there's some outstanding objections I might need some help getting it done. However, Edith seems ready. Hurricanehink (talk) 01:52, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No objections here. CrazyC83 05:46, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ditto. íslenskur fellibylur #12 (samtal) 14:48, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Almost ready for FAC

message: In the intro of the page you use the word "rapidly" 3 times. Maybe you should change this, as this article is being reviewed for FA status.-Hairchrm 06:16, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Rapidly, Rapidly, Rapidly.....

message: The link for the last ref () is broken. --- RockMFR 23:57, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixing. Apparently the NHC changes the page name every year (so it is now at ). —Cuiviénen 00:29, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  And the Wayback Machine doesn't have a record of it, as it blocks the spider via robots.txt. Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 00:32, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Try web cite - http://www.webcitation.org Raul654 05:51, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Nope, doesn't work either. Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 07:56, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken link 

message: Is it just me or does that picture resemble a face with it's cheeks puffed up and blowing...weird. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by GothmogII (talk • contribs) 11:27, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hey, you're right! Brutannica 03:49, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  A face. 

message: Since it's a FA, it has been vandalized a bit. Semi-protection until off front page? -Domovoi 17:50, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nah, it's still manageable. Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 21:09, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Hurricane Edith (1971). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080923015222/http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/general/lib/lib1/nhclib/mwreviews/1971.pdf to http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/general/lib/lib1/nhclib/mwreviews/1971.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061011202057/http://www.vvm.com/~curtis/AMSTCTor.html to http://www.vvm.com/~curtis/AMSTCTor.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061002013500/https://www.fema.gov/news/event.fema?id=1516 to http://www.fema.gov/news/event.fema?id=1516
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080923015222/http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/general/lib/lib1/nhclib/mwreviews/1971.pdf to http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/general/lib/lib1/nhclib/mwreviews/1971.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:34, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: *Decent amount of scholarly literature discussed here (I tried to weed out earlier Ediths but there are some still here)
*The article claims there is no known Mexico impact. While I haven't checked Mexican newspapers, I would implore that impact definitely did occur. The storm made landfall in Mexico twice. The Mexican gov't produced  and  detailing the rainfall. 
This feels so wrong on so many levels, but I regretfully have to send this to WP:FARGIVEN since there's a lot missing. CCI check is not done. NoahTalk 20:18, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you still have the same concerns listed above for this article? If so, would you be interested in bringing this article to WP:FAR? Z1720 (talk) 14:52, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: No progress has been made. I don't have the time to raise a FAR and participate since I am heading into finals. Noah, AATalk 22:31, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:URFA/2020]]