Talk:SS Valencia

message: Great article but I wonder about " . . . and the Valencia set off at 11:20 AM with nine officers, 56 crew members and at least 108 passengers aboard.[1] As she passed by Cape Mendocino in the early morning hours of January 21, the weather took a turn for the worse . . "  If she set off at 11:20 am, on the same day she passed the Cape, it wouldn't get early in the morning, or in the morning at all.  I guess I am assuming the cape is near the departure point . . .  Was it the next morning, or ??  Nit picking I guess, it may all be correct but it makes me wonder if something is wrong here.  KenWalker | Talk 18:42, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've clarified that section. She actually left San Francisco on the 20th and passed by the cape the next morning. Looking at a map , the cape is actually pretty far away from San Francisco, so I think everything makes sense. Thanks for mentioning this – I should have been clearer about the dates when I wrote that section. →smably 19:21, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early Morning? 

message: I added a couple of details, this is a great article, I thought something of the horror of this wreck, for some reason worse then others it seems (maybe because of the drawn-out nature of the last drownings) needed to be written.Mtsmallwood (talk) 07:48, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: A couple of additions

message: I've found source documents on the National Archives website, but I'm not quite sure if there's an easy way to bring them together into a single PDF to attach to the article, or if they would be a better source to cite than some of what's already cited. Any recommendations or suggestions? Here's the link.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Choogler (talk • contribs) 21:41, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Source documents from investigation into incident

message: I am pleased to announce that the background history behind the unfortunate Valencia has been added, along with her lesser known East Coast history. Apparently, she was a Red "D" Line steamer built for Caribbean service and was the younger sister to the Caracas. Interestingly enough, the Caracas was also wrecked. In 1889, the Red "D" Line sold Caracas to the Oregon Pacific Railroad Company, which renamed it Yaquina, but she was wrecked in Yaquina Bay by running aground rather than ever seeing the projected service with her new owners. 707 (talk) 21:54, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ship's background history added. 

message: This sentence suggests to me that she missed the strait (and thus Puget Sound), but discovered the error after some 20 miles.  But it appears from, reading the whole article, that the error wasn't discovered until some time after the wreck.  How about "... the Valencia missed the entrance to the Strait of Juan de Fuca ...", and strike "by more than 20 miles ..."? Terry Thorgaard (talk) 22:36, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Final Voyage section; "... the Valencia overshot the entrance to the Strait of Juan de Fuca by more than 20 miles " 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on SS Valencia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Attempted to fix sourcing for http://collections.ic.gc.ca/folklore/ocean/wreck/valencia.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071008062218/http://www.bamfieldarts.com/pages/6/index.htm to http://www.bamfieldarts.com/pages/6/index.htm
*Attempted to fix sourcing for http://oregonstate.edu/dept/ncs/newsarch/2002/Jul02/maritime.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:27, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on SS Valencia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131005014906/http://shipbuildinghistory.com/history/shipyards/2large/inactive/cramp.htm to http://shipbuildinghistory.com/history/shipyards/2large/inactive/cramp.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:04, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on SS Valencia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141220082203/http://www.shipbuildinghistory.com/history/shipyards/2large/inactive/cramp.htm to http://www.shipbuildinghistory.com/history/shipyards/2large/inactive/cramp.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:32, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I think I know you really mean United States Crews and United states registration, because there is no country called America, there is a continent called America, North and South. I think for an international audience this needs to be changed. Avi8tor (talk) 06:43, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sail under American Registration and be manned by American crews