Talk:Irish Citizen Army

message: The Mauser 1898 rifle shown is completely incorrect.  Few M1898 rifles would have been available in 1916, merely a few soldiers' souvenirs.  The Mauser rifes available through arms dealers would have been the M1871 (singleshot) and M1871/14 (repeating) Mauser 1871 variants.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.56.138.65 (talk) 18:15, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. -R. fiend 04:32, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct name 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Irish Citizen Army. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150202164329/http://flag.blackened.net/revolt/cc1913/ica.html to http://flag.blackened.net/revolt/cc1913/ica.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:16, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: In the 'Easter Rising' section:
"The confusion in the chain of command caused conflict with the Volunteers. Harry Colley and Harry Boland came out from their outposts in the Wicklow Chemical Manure Company's office 200 yards away, where they were under the command of an irascible officer, Vincent Poole; the post had been set up by James Connolly, without countermanding orders from affective Volunteers."
a) Are we to assume that the men are Harry Colley and Harry Boland? The Boland article mentions his "active role" in the Rising but gives no details; the Colley article mentions no link.
b) "affective"—what are we to understand by this word? Is it a mis-spelling of "effective"?—or perhaps one of "affected", in the sense that Connolly's actions might have impaired the military strength of the Irish Volunteers present? Or is there another interpretation?
c) Also, there is perhaps an ambiguity in the final sentence between competing senses of "without him countermanding orders from.." and "without orders, that would countermand his, existing from.." Harfarhs (talk) 23:36, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing passage 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:23, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:08, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:13, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion