Talk:Ministro Pistarini International Airport

message: Please do not add or remove airlines or destinations from the Table, unless you provide a reliable reference.--Jetstreamer (talk) 15:31, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, however, if the route is ending with a reliable source, then that destination can be removed. Also, do not add new routes to the table until the airline gives an actual firm date. Snoozlepet (talk) 19:05, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding/removing airlines and/or destinations 

message: This brand-new created section is written in very poor English, seemingly translated "as is" from another language, and needs to be completely rewritten. Furthermore, it lacks references, and its contents is at least dubious, as I've randomly checked the Florida West International Airways website and the airline does not serve Buenos Aires. Where all this information came from? I'd improve it all by myself, but I'm really busy at this time. Anyone?--Jetstreamer (talk) 21:50, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cargo Airlines section 

message: Suggest merging the two names of the airport: Official (Ministro Pistarini Intl. Airport) and colloquial (Ezeiza Airport) for an unique article title name as Ezeiza-Ministro Pistarini International Airport(Aeropuerto Internacional de Ezeiza-Ministro Pistarini in Spanish). Ezeiza Airport is not the airport's name but is it commonly used. --Scoelho86 (talk) 23:26, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Only official names are to be included within infoboxes. The difference between both names is explained in the lead section. The url provided above is not the official one, but the webpage of the operator.--Jetstreamer (talk) 00:00, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name Change 

message: Are most of the incidents/accidents listed relevant?  Is an accident that happened thousands of kilometres away relevant to an article on the airport, regardless of whether the aircraft was bound for, or departed from, Buenos Aires?  The couple of incidents that occurred while landing, or on the approach, should stay.  Skinsmoke (talk) 06:57, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Cleanup done.--Jetstreamer (talk) 13:03, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incidents/Accidents 

message: The aerial view is outdated. Should be updated since the terminal structure was heavily modified.
--190.193.65.156 (talk) 22:11, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: You may contribute with an updated image if you have one.--Jetstreamer Talk 04:34, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aerial view outdated 

message: * 
* 
* 
* 
* 
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
--Jetstreamer  22:31, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archived references not used in the article 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Ministro Pistarini International Airport. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.aerolineas.com.ar/arg/main.asp?idSitio=AR&idPagina=68&idIdioma=en&cmbPrensa=1052
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100523002936/http://www.aa2000.com.ar/mapa_del_sitio.aspx?aspxerrorpath=%2FchangeLeng.aspx to http://www.aa2000.com.ar/mapa_del_sitio.aspx?aspxerrorpath=%2FchangeLeng.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:05, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Avianca Costa Rica don't fly to Ezeiza, that information is FALSE. Only Avianca Peru and Colombia does it
--190.247.140.6 (talk) 02:30, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Avianca Costa Rica NO 

message: Hello! As previously done in 2011 by someone else, I suggest to change this article's name to Ezeiza International Airport, or at least something that includes Ezeiza. The reason for this is because no one ever mentions the airport as Ministro Pistarini. The sign over the entry to the airport (located on top of the parking fee toll) says Aeropuerto Internacional Ezeiza ('Ezeiza International Airport', visible on Google Maps' Street View). Apart from that, other airports run by the same company announce flights arriving here as 'Ezeiza'. The IATA (EZE) and ICAO (SAEZ) codes of the airport were clearly assigned after this name. Yes, it is not the official name, but we're keeping on line with 'official only' at what expense? In my opinion, the current name jeopardizes the availability of the article. Most people who are not inside the world of aviation do not know this name, so being redirected to a page named like this might prevent them from realizing that this is the article they were looking for. Of course, this is just an opinion, and I'm open to hear other ones. Aflyingeditor (talk) 04:30, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a clear WP:COMMONNAME case; I support the proposal.--Jetstreamer  14:32, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  What about raising the matter at WT:AIRPORTS to see what others have to say?--Jetstreamer  14:34, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too-complicated-to-find name