lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Development guide plan

message: So I might get someone upset here, but I removed the speedy deletion template because I can't see any reason for it and more importantly, none has been given on this talk page. Was this just vandalism? If whoever put it up is really serious about it please argue your point here. Kevmitch 21:41, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speedy Deletion? Huh?
Talk:French cruiser Marseillaise (1935)

message: How could the catapult be removed in '43?
It couldn't. My Typo. Correction made. Folks at 137 19:32, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Culture of medieval Poland

message: Doesn't this overlap with History of Poland (966–1385)? Adam Bishop 01:45, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article:
Thus the earliest examples of Polish literature were written in Latin language. Among them are the Gospels from Gniezno and Płock, Codex aureus and Codex aureus Pultoviensis, dating from as early as the second half of the eleventh century. Other notable examples of early Polish books include the Bishop Ciołek'a Latin Missal and Olbracht's Gradual. 
These are manuscripts and have nothing to do with Polish literature. In the same way we can attribute the Latin Gospels from France to French literature , what makes an equal sense. Codices including Latin literature can be called Polish only as they were written (kept) in Poland. But presence of Augustine of Hippo in a Polish codex does not make him a Polish writer, does it? The same with missals and graduals, common liturgical books. This is already the second article in English Wiki I found which makes the same error. Kameal (talk) 21:38, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Manuscripts are not a literature 

message: Casimir the Great died without legal heir.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.9.121.90 (talk) 07:59, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kalimach was toutor of Fryderyk Jagiellończyk sons.
Talk:Women Strike for Peace

message: — Assignment last updated by Yenakimwalker (talk) 21:26, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Protest and Police in US History

message: — Assignment last updated by Public-historian-90 (talk) 13:38, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: HIST 121 - U.S. History since 1877
Wikipedia talk:Special:Cite

message: What does this actually do? ~  Ghelæ talkcontribs 14:16, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It creates bibliographic citations in several standard styles. Users who are preparing research papers can copy and paste the citations. Seahen 18:36, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

message: I think this page should be on Wiktionary, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikiquote and adapted for Commons. The material there is every bit as citeable as those on Wikipedia. Seahen 18:36, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copy to other wikis?

message: The Special:Cite tool doesn't seem to respect the user's time zone preferences. I have an offset of -4:00 set in my user preferences. It's currently May 14 for me, but May 15 for GMT. The Special:Cite tool gives me a date of May 15. -- – Zawersh 00:43, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  User preferences 

message: In the "important note", please remove the spaces flanking the two em-dashes ( — ), so that they will be unspaced, per the Manual of Style. I know this is not an article, but consistency in style is a good thing all the same. Waltham, The Duke of 19:56, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The page I'm looking at is a soft redirect to a search box. Where is the "important note"?  Skomorokh  20:04, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Agh... I've put this in the wrong page. Sorry about that. Try MediaWiki:Citethispage-content... Waltham, The Duke of 20:14, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dashes 

message: Looking at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Cite&page=Take_the_%22A%22_Train&id=453858395 I see from //en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Take_the_%22A%22_Train&oldid=453858395. The http is missing at all URLs. --Gerrit CUTEDH 15:31, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bug in URLs
Talk:Mary Archer

message: Mary Archer is not a "Baroness", you are only a Baroness if you are created a life peer. Mary Archer is married to a Peer, and thus takes the title "Lady" as a courtesy title. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by LukeLockwood (talk • contribs) 14:21, 2006 April 11 (UTC).
: This article has just been moved to fix the title. -- PFHLai 16:44, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Really ? According to Peerage#Styles and titles, "the wife of a Baron is officially titled Lady, while a woman holding that rank in her own right (usually a life peeress) is officially titled Baroness but is also commonly referred to in speech as Lady." Which one applies to Mary Archer ? Or, is the Peerage page wrong ?  And, do we really need the peerage title in the article title ? -- PFHLai 19:15, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If the article says that, it's wrong. There's a huge difference between conventional usage and the legal form of a title — Barons are always referred to as "Lord So-and-So" as well, but we put their articles at John Smith, Baron So-and-So, because that's the correct full form. Legally, there's no difference between the titles of a Baroness in her own right and the wife of a Baron: they're both "The Right Honourable Mary Jane, Baroness Something-or-Other". Proteus (Talk) 14:22, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

text: You obviously haven't actually read the Debrett's work you cite, because it says no such thing. Proteus (Talk) 14:22, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

text: I'm sorry, but that's rubbish. Proteus (Talk) 16:40, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I notice that this article is the only one which does not distinguish between the wife of a peer and a Baroness in her own right. Isn't this rather confusing? When I saw the article, I thought Mary Archer had been given a peerage, which she hasn't. Surely it could be corrected.
Other similar persons' entries (e.g. Audrey Callaghan) are clearer.
I also notice that the poster repeatedly correcting it has supplied no source, yet others have supplied a source for suggesting that the article should be renamed. Yet it is the unsupported, confusing version that remains. How odd.
--Stevouk 11:25, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Common Usage 
Talk:Francis Olympic Field

message: I can translate it into Chinese, but right now I am troubled with endless homework...
I will try to when I have more free time:)
MIN, Baili 05:27, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Whenever and whatever you can add is fine! I have a bit of research to do also, so I completely understand . . . Thanks, Min! --Lmbstl 10:13, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Chinese translation
Talk:Intuition (disambiguation)

message: I removed the following disambig link from the list
* Intuition (gut feeling) - a spontaneous impulse to take an immediate, unplanned action, which in retrospect, proves to be the most beneficial action to take in order to positively influence an unknown future event or situation.
since the page had been deleted via prod.  At present, the issue is being contested, so the link may need to be restored at a later date.  Removed for now since the link goes nowhere.  --TeaDrinker 21:50, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed listing

message: I have no idea why this goes to a primary dab, which needs repair. And, a new article, Intuition (philosophy) seems to need merging into Intuition (knowledge).  My opinion is that the primary topic should be Intuition, with a link to Intuition (disambiguation).  What do you think? Viriditas (talk) 01:38, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd support a proposed move of Intuition to Intuition (disambiguation) and of Intuition (knowledge) to Intuition. I'm less opinionated on the merger -- if it's used in a particular way in philosophical academics, a separate article would be warranted, but I don't read many philosophy journals. -- JHunterJ (talk) 01:54, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll notify the psychology and philosophy projects before doing anything. Viriditas (talk) 03:07, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Is it ok if I move this discussion to Talk:Intuition to centralize it for the projects? Viriditas (talk) 03:17, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Certainly!  Thanks.  -- JHunterJ (talk) 03:32, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Intuition]] 

message: I could swear there was a PBS game show by this name sometime in the '90s, but it's not listed on the disambiguation main page. Any reason? Lack of info. perhaps?98.209.57.0 (talk) 10:54, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Lack of article to disambiguate? -- JHunterJ (talk) 11:08, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hmm...
Talk:Richard Francis Burton/Archive

message: I removed a link to an edition of Burton's "The Jew…." It pointed to http://www.REMOVETHISPARTjrbooksonline.com/jgei.htm, which is flatly anti-semitic. (Indeed, even as he commends Burton's attitude toward Jews the author faults Burton for a "a strange bias favoring Islamic practitioners and Gypsies.") 
I am not sure what the Wikipedia terms are on this, but I know that the pre-eminent search engine, Google uses links as votes. The problem is compounded by the fact that this link is in running text. It looks like an internal Wikipedia link, not an external link. And it certainly doesn't mention that Burton's text is only part of a page, the rest of which is the most vile hate.
: I don't think it is fair to describe Burton as anti-Semitic.  He ran into a lot of trouble during his internship at Damascus by angering a group of Jewish money lenders and they made the claim that he was anti-Semitic.  I think that certainly in the context of the time he was not anti-semitic though I'm aware that sections of The Gypsy, the Jew and El Islam can be read in that light.--Richard Clegg 08:37, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anti-Semitic Link 

message: Which Lord Derby praised Burton? My guess would be either the former prime minister (Edward Smith-Stanley, 14th Earl of Derby) or his son, Edward Stanley, 15th Earl of Derby. As it stands just linking to Lord Derby is grossly insufficient. Mackensen (talk) 12:24, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Derby 

message: I altered this para because it is incorrect:
:His translation of The Perfumed Garden was burned by his widow, Isabel Arundel Gordon, because she believed it would be harmful to his reputation.
This para also needs work because it is rather dated:
:His widow wrote a biography of her husband which is the record of a lifetime of devotion. Another monument is the grandiose Arab tent of stone and marble which she built for his tomb at Mortlake in southwest London. On the other hand, she burnt his 40-year collection of diaries and journals, fearful that public revelation of Burton's lifelong interest in bizarre sexual practices would lead to vicious rumours about his personal inclinations. In the words of the 1997 Britannca, "the loss to history and anthropology was monumental; the loss to Burton's biographers, irreparable". --mervyn 10:48, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Perfumed Garden
Talk:Battle of Kyiv

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: no consensus. to move at this time (closed by non-admin page mover) Megan B.... It’s all coming to me till the end of time 18:46, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The ongoing Battle of Kyiv (2022) takes priority over all the previous battles for the city which has always been called "Kyiv", even if its name had been previously transliterated into English using the slightly-different Russian transliterated form, "Kiev". As for the disambiguation page's main title header, we should take our cue from the Battle of Beijing disambiguation page which uses the current transliteration of the Chinese capital's name as the all-inclusive main header. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 00:12, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: My use of the second-person pronoun is perhaps distracting from the point I was trying to make—that multiple bold moves had been previously attempted and were reverted. That a third bold move has happened, despite it being plainly obvious from the history of this page that such a move is controversial, shows that this contentious move from the longstanding title should have been handled via RM, rather than the move request being filed the other way around. — Mhawk10 (talk) 22:43, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  Sorry, I understand that some people don’t like it, but in my opinion this disambiguation page is now clearly out of the scope of the “historical articles” decision, even broadly interpreted. Its contents are not restricted to pre-1995. The main article’s title is clear consensus default name for this city in Wikipedia, and that was reached with WP:COMMONNAME front and centre of the discussion. As far as I can tell, it was last moved in September 2020, so I’m not sure what bold moves you are concerned with. I was fully prepared for a BRD revert, but no one chose to do that. I agree that there should be a clear consensus identified either way. Now we are discussing it to determine consensus, so I don’t see what is to be accomplished by complaining about the completely legitimate WP:BOLD move that led to this discussion. Completely without relation to how we should proceed, I can’t help but note the irony that the Russians made this inevitable by attacking Kyiv last week. —Michael Z. 00:25, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 26 February 2022
Talk:Merchants Bridge

message: The bridge was not completed in 1889.  The last span connected with the east pier a day or two before the end of the year. St. Louis Post- Dispatch, 1 Jan 1890, page 2.
The formal opening of the bridge occurred on Saturday, 3 May 1890, with imposing ceremonies.  St. Louis Post- Dispatch, 4 May 1890, page 20.
74.112.104.250 (talk) 14:26, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
Talk:Poplar Street Bridge

message: Are dead links.  Don't know how to note/change that or whatever, couldn't figure it out in the guides, guess I'll just leave a note here.  24.107.190.142 (talk) 18:07, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Post-Dispatch references 

message: MLK bridge should be mentioned in this article, since it's close to the Poplar and generally serves to facilitate travel along the same highways.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.112.220.84 (talk) 23:12, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Doesn't it have its own article?  This one's about the Poplar Street Bridge, no?  To my mind, it's about the bridge, not the roads.  An article about the roads might include both. - Denimadept (talk) 23:40, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: MLK Bridge
Talk:Sportsman's Park

message: the article makes it sound as if the same stadium was used from 1880 to 1966, when in fact there are at least 2 and probably 3 stadiums on the site. The 1880 stadium (1) was used by the Cardinals (Browns in the 19th century). In 1902 a new wood stadium (2) was built by the AL Browns then in 1909 a steel stadium (3?) was built by the Browns  Smith03 02:42, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The various incarnations of the structure sat on the same site and generally used the same name, so many sources tend to treat them as one. Wahkeenah 06:42, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: IP address asserts Boston a smaller market during 1902-1952. Recommend looking at two factors: (1) Populations of each city for 1900, 1910, 1920, 1930, 1940, 1950; and (2) high watermarks of combined attendance. Arguably original research. But it would give us an idea of whether either statement might have the ring of truth to it. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 17:55, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Smallest market? 

message: The dimensions 1926 and after are well-known and are visible in photographs. 310 to right, not 320. 351 to left, not 355. 426 and 422 to the center field corners, and not only not 430 between them (no marker) but mathematically impossible anyway. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 04:32, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This illustration  matches the info from the Sporting News baseball guides of the 1950s and early 1960s. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 04:42, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: As does this:  Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 04:48, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dimensions 
Talk:The Muny

message: The Muny is the world's largest and oldest outdoor theatre.
:Oldest outdoor theatre?  There's no way this is possible.  I'm taking the whole phrase out until it can be cited with a reference. Euphoria 01:30, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  World's _____ 

message: Why not add Bob Dylan to the list of celebrities who have appeared at the Muny?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.249.211.20 (talk) 04:25, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Famous People at the Muny 
Talk:Provel cheese

message: Removed this unattributed claim -- without attribution from a resturant review (or some such article) it is not impartial or objective enough for an encyclopedia article:
A commonly used description by detractors of its presence on St. Louis-style pizza is "like runny, white mac and cheese sauce.” Tysalpha 18:05, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: unattributed

message: None of them are valid, or so it seems to me. I've removed them from the article and pasted them here in case anyone can resolve the errors. Andrew Dalby 14:44, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links
Talk:KDHX

message: Not sure the Double Helix Corporation really merits a separate article from the radio station that seems to be its primary reason for existence. (Its former public and community access cable channels can probably, at most, be mentioned as an aside in the KDHX article.) WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:01, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 08:36, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Double Helix Corporation]] into [[KDHX]]
Talk:KFTK-FM

message: Yes now KTFK is affected by the rants that Jaime Allman was accused of doing in a tweet against David Hogg
https://radioinsight.com/headlines/167725/kftks-jaime-allman-creates-another-social-media-induced-headache-for-entercom/
http://www.stltoday.com/lifestyles/columns/joe-holleman/jamie-allman-taken-off-his-kftk-talk-show-at-least/article_809ee913-14df-5fa0-9e84-f32e9cb243a0.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:640:C600:8270:429F:87FF:FE0B:3663 (talk) 21:52, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Jaime Allman Controversy 2018
Talk:SIP

message: ----
What about the SIP IP Telephony Protocol? I expected to see it here!
Um.  It's the second one down. 160.91.212.18 21:38, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

message: Hi.I found this info aboutSession Initiation Protocol  but didn't seems to agree with what it written in the article. I reported them here just in case "an IETF standard, one of the leading signaling protocols for Voice over IP (VoIP), along with H.323"--Dia^ (talk) 15:12, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Session Initiation Protocol

message: SIP can be used for  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.91.207.30 (talk) 06:38, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uses of SIP
Talk:Shel Talmy

message: Shel Talmy did not produce Waterloo Sunset. Ray Davies did, if the wikipedia article about the song is correct -- and I believe it is. Cbellomy (talk) 18:38, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dedicated "List of recordings produced by Shel Talmy" 

message: This article was bordering on unreadable so I've started to clean it up. I will update as I go, hope to have citations and additional info within the week. please do not remove the Rebecca Walker reference, it's an important part of her biography and talmy's. --CatherineHubescher (talk) 18:36, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean Up 

message: The article here on Mr. Talmy, under discography, notes that he produced Waterloo Sunset.  But when you follow the link embedded to that song, it says that the song was produced by Ray Davies, as Mr. Talmy's contract with the band had expired.  Not sure which is correct, but I think both Talmy and Davies may still be alive. 2600:6C55:6300:6A28:81F4:F9DA:8163:1C6E (talk) 20:18, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Waterloo Sunset (song)
Talk:Parliament House, Melbourne

message: I have another image (taken by me) of this building. It's not pretty, but maybe with a bit of photoshopping...:) Anyway, just in case, it's here. Stevage 14:34, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do we need another image? 

message: I have ammended this, but it still requires a citation.
The statement was wrong.  There was a larger 19th Century building even in Melbourne !   The Victorian Railways Administration building, constructed in the 19th Century and completed in 1896 next to Spencer Street Station  still exists and is larger.  However it no longer functions as a public building (it was converted to private apartments in the 1990s).  So there may still be a basis for the "largest 19th century public building claim", however it is dubious and would need to be cross-checked.  It is a big world and I'm sure there are some big ones out there. --Biatch (talk) 00:55, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Largest 19th Century Public Building claim 

message: When I was a small boy, of about 10 years of age, in 1950, I was living in Melbourne, Victoria. 
As a metter of interest, my Mother pointed out to me two slots in the Spring St. facade of Parliament House, Melbourne.
They were readily visible, if you knew where to look for them, and from memory, they were about 25 x 5 cm in dimensions, and horizontal in aspect to a viewer.
My Mother told me that the slots were incorporated into the design of the Victorian House, to allow a rifle to be placed behind the slots to protect Parliament House in the event of civil insurrection.
In my business life between the 1970's and the 1990's, I took the opportunity of showing many visitors to Melbourne, these rifle slots.
I have absolutely no doubt that the slots in the facade of Melbourne's Parliament House used to be there. I clearly saw them many times.
Yet, when I looked for them a few weeks ago, they are no longer there!
What has happened to the Victorian Parliament House "Sniper Slots"?
By the way, no, I am not a "nut".
Peter Roberts.
 Brighton, Melbourne, VICTORIA.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.161.51.198 (talk) 14:11, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  SNIPER RIFLE SLITS IN THE SPRING STREET FACADE OF PARLIAMENT HOUSE.  

message: If possible, a link which describes the Architectural style, should be added.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.43.227.18 (talk) 16:16, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Style
Talk:KFNS (AM)

message: I don't have the time or interest to change the article, but there was a total shakeup of the programming on May 27th, 2008 if anyone wants a useful source.StreamingRadioGuide (talk) 04:44, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:KSLZ

message: Per a discussion located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_%28assistance%29#DJs.2C_Radio_Stations.2C_Notability.2C_Oh_My.21, certain personalities have been added to this article.  Please view the discussion prior to making any edits to this particular section.  Thank you!  --InDeBiz1 (talk) 09:16, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personalities 
Talk:KPNT

message: Wasn't the first morning show hosted by someone going by the name "Mud Man"?  i think he was formerly out of the DC metro area.  I believe his side kick was a woman named Mary Ann.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.13.198.106 (talk) 07:09, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: morning show

message: The line "They then picked up the legendary rock shock jock himself, Howard Stern" doesn't seem to fit with how Wikipedia should be written and should be edited, but I don't understand the subject matter enough to edit it properly. Jezzamon (talk) 01:13, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inappropriate Tone/Neutrality