Talk:Huia

message: Where is the pronunciation for Huia?
::very roughly HOO-ee-uh. Kahuroa 05:46, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added an IPA pronunciation into the intro. I'm no expert on this so feel free to correct if you think its wrong Goldfinger820 (talk) 06:24, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: corrected. You had y for the u - its definitely not y. Maybe slightly more fronted than English, but closer to a short version of German Kuh than müde. And I wouldn't have thought the h was as strong as in English ahead, more like house. Generally in Māori the usual spelling IS the IPA Kāhuroa (talk) 09:55, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: yep makes sense cheers Goldfinger820 (talk) 11:19, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Huia pronunciation 

message: Can someone please get rid of it? I've had a a go but don't really know how to do it.
Kotare 04:31, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Can't see the space you mean. Maybe it's just something to do with your own computers display or resolution? Kahuroa 05:46, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Massive blank space below "decline and extinction" section

message: Righto I just finished a big overhaul of this article, expanded out the description and 4 of the 5 sections about Huia bio. substantially, added section on place in maori culture and expanded info. on decline and efforts at conservation. It would be nice to get some sort of picture/photo for the last section; a photo of dead Huia or of NZ deforestation would be great.. if you know of anything along these lines please sing out. Kotare 09:11, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, it was too long, I changed it around and turned it into three sentences, and also made Huia singular instead of plural for consistency. I think there are a quite a few sentences in the new sections that need attention, and sometimes one sentence seems to say much the same as the preceding one. Will take another look later Kahuroa 19:53, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Kotare, can you tell me more about the 'worn as hats' quoted from MBL? Was that by Māori? Kahuroa 19:23, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion 

message: I reckon this is gettin' there.cheers,  Casliber (talk · contribs) 13:19, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  To-do list for FAC 

message: This sentence at the end: 'The Huia had been little studied by naturalists before it was driven to extinction.' Does this contradict the other statements in the text that the extinction of the Huia was partly caused by naturalists hunting specimens? They didn't study the birds they shot? Kahuroa 20:43, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Kahuroa, sorry for the late reply. From the material I read while researching to prepare the body of text I contributed to this article earlier this year, the gist I got was that collectors ran around the North Island shooting far too many huia for museums around the world which would stuff the birds - these collectors didn't really give a toss about science they were just looking to make a quick buck. Detailled information about the birds morphology from all these specimens that were shot exists but almost no research was done on their ecology and behaviour. Kotare (talk) 04:30, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Contradiction?

message: This is for all who contributed alot (Kahuroa and Kotare etc.)  - do you guys want this nominated at WP:GAN as a good staging point? Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:51, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Casliber, sorry about the late response I haven't been active on wikipedia for months but am keen to get back into it and it would be great to pick up where I left off close to a year ago now with this article. I think the GA nomination is a great idea, it would be a good incentive to really get into fleshing it out. A collab. would be ideal I think.. At present it's a bit out of proportion as there is lots about Huia and people and little about it's basic biology, I have the HANZAB article on the species here and that itself and the sources it mentions should be of great use for developing this aspect of the article. Stay in touch about this idea, I look forward to developing the article more. Cheers, Kotare (talk) 10:22, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Choice! I keep pumping the biological info in and a couple of us will give it a massage, spit'n'boot polish and the you can post it at GAN. Not too far off. Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 10:53, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

text: That sounds like the 'scientific present in the past' tense, but you're right. Like Kotare I had a bit of a wikibreak a while back but if I can help... (BTW I have also been getting images from flickr for other NZ birds like Kererū and Kākā which I think will help us move those articles along the GA path) No one's taking many pix of huia these days tho Kāhuroa (talk) 19:44, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nominating for [[WP:GAN]] as a staging point? 

message: Human induced? surely just extinction will suffice as a section heading. Sabine's Sunbird  talk 03:28, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah. done. Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 12:39, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section heading 

message: OK, I took a look at the article and had a few questions.
:The end of the Ecology paragraph mentions that there are sound recordings of a human imitating a Huia at the NZ Sound Archives. Can a weblink and proper citation be provided? Is the file here the one mentioned? (yeah, the name - McPherson Natural History Unit - gives it away)
:In the reproduction section, it notes that breeding took place "in the early summer" from one source, and in November from a source in front of me. Is November early summer in New Zealand, or is one source wrong/drawing from different primary sources? (we-ell, Summer is Dec/Jan/Feb traditionally...so they are similar. Will have another look at my sources too)
:The last section details how cloning may have been funded and underway in 1999. Obviously it has not happened yet, but is there an update? (good point - will look)
:Per the headings, while they are colorfully named, the two under Relationship with humans could probably be renamed “In Culture” and “Extinction,” or something like that. (done/agreed)
Other than that, it looks pretty good. Shame that there isn’t more on its behavior, but you can’t do much in terms of new research with extinct species. Oh, and could someone double-check my copyedit to make sure I didn’t change some weird British thing? Thanks, and good job on this article. Rufous-crowned Sparrow (talk) 22:31, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Regarding cloning, there appears to be zip since the 199 mentions. Weird. Question is, how best to describe it...or just drop it altogether...Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 13:04, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps we could round it off by mentioning views on how feasible cloning might be, like those at the end of this article. -- Avenue (talk) 18:33, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Aha, nice one. I think that will cap it nicely. Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 21:24, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, and something so obvious I can't believe I missed it- is there any data on the bird's weight? Rufous-crowned Sparrow (talk) 02:21, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Buller gave the weight of "a recently killed specimen" as 14½ oz. (sex not mentioned). -- Avenue (talk) 09:18, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Good catch. Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 19:43, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyedit and Notes 

message: I am almost done with a new set of contributions which has greatly expanded this article.. I'm just going to chuck some more stuff from HANZAB in about breeding now. Not all sources are created equal and to be honest, I think nearly all, if not all the major, reliable, sources with comprehensive information on the Huia have now been accessed and trawled for info - there are many other, more specific sources which might add the odd tidbit of information - but at the end of the day, in terms of all the information that exists on the Huia (and you must remember that it's biology was not well studied before it went extinct) this article is approaching complete saturation. I would be interested to know how close to FA we're getting now.. can't be far off at all.
There's still a little room for expansion of some of the minor biology aspects (specifically calls/vocalizations) but certainly the stuff on its relationships with humans is pretty much done and dusted. I think a couple of extra images would really add to this article though;
* We could do a distribution map for the Huia showing its former range in the North Island before maori arrived, then showing its range at the start of european colonization. We could use a single colour (I was thinking red or green) and have it a lighter shade for the earlier range and a darker shade for the 1840 range.
* A photo of NI lowland deforestation in the 19th/early 20th century would be a great complement to the text in the first part of the "extinction" section - apart from anything else, this is a big block of text and a nice black and white photo to break it up would make it look much better. If we have trouble finding one already online, I think I can get one for the forests around Levin from about 1907
Kotare (talk) 07:34, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Both of those are fantastic ideas. I have been making maps and am happy to do so if you have images of originals in books to email me. Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:42, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Looking good. Did a fairly cursory copy edit, and I have just three questions and a comment: 1: In  Description, this (covered in brown) seems incomplete or maybe just slightly awkward: The immature Huia had duller plumage that was covered in brown - does it mean just brown?. 2: In Distribution and habitat: Does birds mean Huia in this passage or birds in general: Only a few birds are known from the extensive pitfall deposits in the karst - it wasn't clear which to me. 3: In  Voice, a quote from hanzab 6:  flute like - not flute-like? And the comment is that there seems to be a bit of editorialising in the extinction section - a bit of personal opinion and passion coming thru - might be better to use cited sources there. Kahuroa (talk) 11:31, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks for the input guys. Casliber: thanks! I do not know of any existing range maps for the Huia but I can draw a rough one up and email it to you. Kahuroa: thanks for doing the copyedit, I've just looked through it and it's really improved the wording a lot. As for your questions: 1. Go with "flecked with brown" - I'm pretty sure that is what is meant. 2. Yes it does mean Huia specifically, probably worth changing 3. yes I agree. As for your comment, that's fine, WP has to be impartial and have a neutral tone after all.. but I am usually very pedantic with referencing and liberally pepper my edits with inline citations - so I can't imagine too much incorrect stuff is in there - I can see a few places where the wording could maybe be changed, however. Would you be able to identify the bits you're concerned about? - and then I can work on them. It will be easier if I do it, because I have most of the sources here with me already. Kotare (talk) 11:40, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Should be looking better now, let me know if there are still any issues - particularly if some bits of info need inline citations for verifiability. Kotare (talk) 12:01, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, that was the part in question. Stuff like when you say "slightly exasperating manner, the strange and contradictory" who is it exasperating? strange and contradictory in whose opinion?  I'll leave it up to you to look at and/or fix as you see fit. Kahuroa (talk) 20:38, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  email away. Casliber (talk · contribs) 13:27, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

text: Kahuroa: yeah man, I mean you're right, the "exasperating" part.. it's "exasperating" me, of course, but to be honest I feel totally robotic giving a caption for that reference and not making some acknowledgment of how bizarre this passage is. My source described it as an "ambiguous attitude" and I just thought "contradictory" was a better way to describe it. I guess, maybe cull "exasperating" and "strange" but at the very least I think "Contradictory" should be left in there .. the author of Wild South relates this passage and makes similar comments too. I'll sleep on it for a bit.Casliber: sweet man, I'll try to get something out to you by the end of this week. I want to keep working on this article just to get a few last things done before we chuck it on to the stage of FA scrutiny, if that's cool. I just had another idea today.. will see if I can do anything about the guilds aspect. Kotare (talk) 10:06, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: yeah K, totally see ur point. Maybe just a slight tone down eh. Kahuroa (talk) 10:22, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

text: argh, sorry man, I'm such a freaking wikiorge!here's the deal; I have been through pretty much every comprehensive information resource on Huia - I can tell you with confidence that the written coverage of this bird in the article in both biology and "Huia and humans" sections is approaching complete saturation - what I mean is that pretty much everything that is known about the bird is up there now, there is not much left to add at all.. so we're pretty sweet in that aspect, the major one. but Visually I think the article could really benefit from 3 more things 1. That distribution map - I contacted User:Msikma to ask if he knew where i could get a map to send to you Cas but he never replied.. KVanlerlinde (sp?) I think is the name of another user who has done similar maps who I will message now. Second, the deforestation photos.. I have the book with the photos now, I grabbed it a aweek ago, I just need to scan them into digital format - i will try to do that this week. Third, I reckon a "New Zealand Wattlebird template" at the bottom of this article would be ace! I will email you some ideas for its design now. Thanks for asking this question and catalysing action on my part! Kotare (talk) 10:23, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I just went through and did some google (scholaring) and there was apparently also a species of Huia feather mite.. there is also some stuff about fruit dispersal ecology in NZ forests and frugivorous birds including Huia that could be added. I'll try to get onto both of these soon. Cheers, Kotare (talk) 12:12, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

text: Yeah that Huia mite stuff is interesting. Re map: I thot u were going to give Casliber the info to make one from? Why do you need help from anyone else?  Kahuroa (talk) 05:42, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Hey man, yeah I know but I want to send him a digital image of nz to make the map out of... I'm going to draw one up by hand and the idea is that he can reproduce it digitally using his skills in this area. I'm not that tech saavy so I don't know where I can just grab a good, free outline map of the North Island. And the ones for Kea and NZ parrots are good and have good colours already there.. I tell you what, I'll draw up the map of huia distribution and email it to Cas' this week.. because finding the NI map file will probably be the easy bit. I drew up a template design prototype today and will email it to Cas also. Do you know how to make templates Kahuroa? maybe you could help.. like I said I'm not too tech saavy beyong basic wikimarkup so I don't know how to make them. Sorry I never got back to you about HANZAB either.. I'm confused also, I will try to get up to the Vic library to see if I can work it out. Kotare (talk) 10:22, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

text:  So how do you think I did the maps for C. australis? Tell us what you need - N Island outline? I'll see what I can do. What u mean by templates Kahuroa (talk) 06:46, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: What about this map? :File:New Zealand North Island outline.png. Kahuroa (talk) 07:23, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  I totally forgot about that, sorry - your C. australis map is freakin' ace!! And yes that map you just posted the link to is ideal! thanks a lot. do you have photoshop kahuroa? maybe you can help me with these deforestation photos in the horowhenua I scanned today.. they need to be moved around and cut up a bit.. this is what I mean by template (sorry, yeah it's an ambiguous term especially here):http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:BirdsKotare (talk) 07:39, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

text: Cheers. Actually Casliber has great colour sense - see the map for Grey Currawong. Very nice. Yeah a template like that is no problem, let's find a nice one and copy it - that one is a tad old school??  Photoshop yep.  19:45, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: thanks - now what to colour where....Kotare, the yellow stripey bit is - you want just that or both sides? Casliber (talk · contribs) 21:32, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  silly Cas! haha.I gave very clear instructions to you in my first email to you yesterday with the deforestation photos, I have copied them from that and pasted them below; the email itself was quite long and you sound very busy so perhaps you just skimmed over it.."Now, I printed off a map from google maps of the central north island today and I will draw the line that marks the northern limit of huia occurence at the time of european settlement on this map tonight and then I will email it through to you. What I was thinking for this map is that we have a north island completely green in two different shades - light green for the northern part to denote the pre human settlement range of the Huia and dark green south of the line (which I will be sending you detail of tonight so you know where to mark it) to deonte where the bird was found by the 1840's. I had another couple of ideas too.. we could have a small black cross in the Tararuas to mark where the last confirmed sighting was and 2 small black circles to mark where other, later sightings in the 20th century occurred  - so there would be one circle behind eastbourne on the eastern side of Wellington harbour and one circle in Urewera national park in the central west part of the island."Thanks again for your help, Kotare (talk) 03:02, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Although now that I think about it that highlighter hatching on just one side must have been confusing and I should have explained what to do on the actual map, so I was actually being a bit silly, haha - my bad. The Gray Currawong map looks great! I should also point out that the WHOLE north island will be green.. Huia were found in both lowland and montane forests after all. so all you have to do is draw the line in and seprate the island into two seperate blocks of different shades of green. Cheers, Kotare (talk) 03:18, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Gotcha - which side you want darker and which lighter? Will do tonight. Casliber (talk · contribs) 04:05, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

text: great idea. I need a little bit of uninterrupted time. Hopefully tonight. Long story...RL has a habit of intruding ... :) Casliber (talk · contribs) 12:55, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Like it, awesome. Only thing I can think of is what about the offshore islands on the east coast off Auckland - Great Barrier, Little Barrier, Waiheke etc, I think they should be coloured the same as the nearby mainland. Because it's pretty much a given they would share the same avifauna??  Some of the small peninsulas along the Northland coasts seem to have missed out on the colour too. Kahuroa (talk) 21:34, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, got 'em (I think). Casliber (talk · contribs) 21:47, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

text: Looks like it.  Is the file name correct? I have rename/move powers on Commons, btw. Kahuroa (talk) 22:33, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major expansion 

message: Good work on the expansion. I've done a few minor edits, but haven't gone through the whole article as yet. I thought I'd pass a few thoughts on:
* The lead might be too short in its current form for FA class. It does mention the bill shape three times, where once should be enough.
* You might want to have a look at Template:Convert.
* For articles with references that are frequently referred to, I would use Template:Sfn, so that it's easier for interested parties to go to the source. I'm not sure whether it's a requirement for FA class, but it's most useful nonetheless. I appreciate that it would be a major effort to implement, though.
I hope this helps. (note that I don't watchlist this, so if you wish to reply, please do so on my talk page) Schwede66 18:41, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some thoughts 

message: Kotare, what do you have in mind for the template - something to go at the bottom of the article? And what do you want in it, NZ wattlebirds only, or what. Kahuroa (talk) 04:56, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  yeah, a blue template at the bottom of the article.I've drawn up a sketch design of a possible template with links to 6 articles.. (2 being kokako and saddleback) but it's easier if you just see the sketch rather than me explain it at great length.. can you get Cas to forward it to you via email? or where do I go to email you on your userpage.. I forget how to find the "email this user" button..Kotare (talk) 10:47, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It's in the toolbox on the left side of the user page. Can be hidden, you have to click on toolbox if it is. Kahuroa (talk) 20:31, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

text: Looks good. BTW I will be out of town over the next coupla weeks so can't do much Kahuroa (talk) 23:22, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Have a good trip! I'll see if I can't help the article along a bit more before you get back :)Kotare (talk) 02:28, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template 

message: Anything in this article we need to incorporate? Sexual dimorphism in bird bills: commoner than we'd thought Kahuroa (talk) 11:01, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Although sexual dimorphism in bill shape is found in other birds such as the riflebirds and sicklebills and in other wood excavating birds including some species of Woodpecker,[1] it was most pronounced in the Huia.[5. Not too much we need to change,  it already is acknowledged that the Huia was not unique in exhibiting this feature but that it was in the degree to which it did. There's a lot of good stuff in that article though, so there's plenty we can add; the osteology stuff at the end in particular and also the case studies of other examples of birds with sexual dimorphism of beak morphology. Really useful article..How'd you find it Kahuroa? Kotare (talk) 11:10, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I follow that blog actually ... but that's an old entry I hadn't come across. I was searching for a nicer copy of Buller's Huia pair illustration (the one on commons has crap contrast) and that brought me to the article. Just thought a nicer version might be usable for the article. U like the range map??? Kahuroa (talk) 21:30, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Bill dimorphism not so special after all?

message: Well, I have spent quite a lot of time over the past 5 days working on this article; you will see I have grown the thing by a total of 8 kb in that period. Here is a rough summary of what has changed;
- Information in the "Extinction" section and the lead is now consistent
- Lead has been fixed up so the Huia's beak isn't named with extensive repitition
- Biology part has been rearranged, now "Social Behaviour and Reproduction" is a seperate section and everything in the article is under a sub-heading
- The material in the "Feeding and Ecology" has been expanded with info. on Huia frugivory and ecology and a photo of Kahikatea fruit has been added.
- Information on the Huia feather mite has been added
- HANZAB has been combed for any remaining info not yet added and the inline citations have been fixed up so that they are for each page in the Huia section now, as opposed to 40 odd citations for a single source with no page numbers
- Information on "Huia" as a name for places, companies and people has been added
- Information on differing regional rates of decline throughout the NI has been added
- More wikilinks added
We have now, as of this month, under the direction of moi, got those 3 new visual elements up too; the distribution map, the deforestation photos and the "Callaeidae" template. I feel very happy with what has been built here and I feel that, at last, the time has come to chuck this one in as a FAC.Kotare (talk) 07:25, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like it's gone through to FA (even if it doesn't show on the article itself as yet). Well done, everybody! Schwede66 21:11, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like it I think... If so I think I will award myself and a couple of others a Little Red Hen award. Kahuroa (talk) 21:26, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Please review the outstanding issues/queries I left on the FAC-- I'd like to see better MOS preparation in future noms. Nice work! SandyGeorgia (Talk) 21:28, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  IT IS TIME (*said in [[Arnold Schwarzenegger|Arnie]] accent*) 

message: Note to all - 28 December (date of last confirmed Huia sighting) would be a good day to get on main page. Or on this day Casliber (talk · contribs) 20:22, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests]] 

message: Okay, I can't find anything. Anyone seen any report on it? Or is it a hoax? Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:15, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  2011 report? 

message: I was wondering if the "pies and curried stew" line was meant to be in a section about settler consumption habits.  Marchant, Higgins, Ambrose, and Steele (2006, p. 1015) do not specify who were eating the huia, although the comments in English about its flavour would suggest they were, at least, Anglophones. I have been unable to find anything in the nzetc, books, or journals that verify pastry and curry as something Maori would have eaten prior to the arrival of Europeans.  Even the concept of it seems a little odd.  Unless someone can verify that Maori ate huia in "pies and curried stew", I propose to move this into a section about colonists' relationships with the bird.  Additionally, I have added Monson (2005) of Brigham Young University to the Further Reading list.  Monson (2005) identifies similar causes of huia extinction as this article, including an expansion on the effects of the Western consumptive culture and the adoption of Christianity by the native population.  Monson (2005) also discusses the naming of Governor Onslow's son for the bird, and the subsequent attempts by Maori to convince the Governor to prevent European hunting (p. 81).  Neither of these items are in the article, and would, I believe, offer a further improvement. --Te Karere (talk) 10:09, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pies and curried stew? 

message: If Huia were already rare by the arrival of Europeans - as is stated - it is not possible that "It was not until European settlement that the huia's numbers began to decline severely". Royalcourtier (talk) 06:38, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added more information on pre-European hunting and range contraction based on more up-to-date sources. Giantflightlessbirds (talk) 21:36, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Decline 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Huia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120415125107/https://ojs.lib.byu.edu/spc/index.php/PacificStudies/article/view/10304/9950 to https://ojs.lib.byu.edu/spc/index.php/PacificStudies/article/view/10304/9950
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:33, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The 3rd-to-last para refers to "the summit of the Akatarawa-Waikane track". Should that be Waikanae, rather than Waikane? Nurg (talk) 08:21, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, absolutely. Will fix. —Giantflightlessbirds (talk) 10:57, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Waikane or Waikanae? 

message: I've genuinely never heard anyone say /ˈhuːjə/, either for the bird, the town or the train (always /ˈhuːiːə/ or /ˈhuːiːa/) (although I see there's a dictionary source for both pronunciations), and a quick YouTube search turned up four sources for three syllable () versus one for two-syllable (). Would anyone object to me switching the order of the two pronunciations to read  ? --Prosperosity (talk) 00:31, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think I've ever had a conversation about the bird, but the town has always been given a three-syllable pronunciation, and I can't imagine 'hoo-yah' would ever be correct. I'd say drop the two-syllable pronunciation from the article.-gadfium 01:10, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

text: The Dictionary of New Zealand English (ed H. W. Orsman), Oxford, 1977, gives a pronunciation of /'huijə/, and the pronunciation for hui is /'huwi/. This work says it uses IPA as devised by the Department of Linguistics, Victoria University of Wellington. 'j' is pronounced as the 'y' in 'yard'.-gadfium 01:28, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  Interesting - I've just checked the NZ Oxford Dictionary and it gives two: /ˈhu:ia/ or /ˈhu:ɪə/ (it also gives hui as /ˈhui/, which is what I'd expect). --Prosperosity (talk) 22:36, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Hoo-yah pronunciation