lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Kyrgyzstan national football team

message: :File:Football Federation of the Kyrgyz Republic logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a non-free use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
-- Marchjuly (talk) 09:09, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for File:Football Federation of the Kyrgyz Republic logo.png
Talk:Santo Trafficante Sr.

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Dana boomer (talk) 16:32, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:Declassified (2004 TV series)

message: 'Declassified is an American television series...' if it *is* then there ought to be more than 13 programmes to describe.  It started in 2004 and season 1 was in 2006?  86.171.176.37 (talk) 20:58, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is or was?
Talk:Infinity cove

message: An example shouldn't be too hard to find here and would be an easy change for a lot of improvement. --76.21.252.107 18:53, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Totally agree. A photograph or diagram would be great too! Peacewashlove (talk) 02:24, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

text: That's not exactly an example of a gradient, at the moment...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.2.40.242 (talk) 23:54, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: An example

message: I've been looking at the design of these and find no clear consensus on the radius of curvature.  If anyone did - since this isn't a primary source - it owuld be good to have that in the article. Midgley (talk) 13:28, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Radius of Curvature 

message: Is what I would call the small thing heaped up over the subject in the illustration, not an infinity curve or cove at all, actually.  Do others take the same view on naming?  Midgley (talk) 13:28, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Light Tent
Talk:Power Grid

message: I edited the paragraph for the China / Korea expansion to add some topical links in the text. I think, though, that some of the text left in there might be copied from a press release or official description of the expansion, particularly the sentence at the end that refers to the players' "income reduced and their grids dark"? 143.167.37.22 (talk) 16:02, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  China / Korea paragraph - contains copied text? 

message: Someone needs to add Power Grid Recharged to this article. Also, should we change the rules to the Recharged rules and then explain original? Hkbusfan (talk) 09:49, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add Power Grid Recharged
Talk:S7G reactor

message: I stumbled on these Navy reactor pages by accident and found the information interesting.  I was part of the original crew with MARF, going from initial testing of the new instrumentation for those reactor pumps, initial fuel loading, etc.  I was the Reactor Operator who took the reactor critical for the first time and did scram testing from 50% and 100% power.  Fun stuff back then!
Stbunten 04:23, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I qualified MO and ELT on MARF before going to Trident Design School across the lot at the S8G prototype. Thanks for the correction to my explanation of the tubes (gadolinium instead of hafnium) — I was working from twenty-some-year-old memory. Where did you after lighting off the MARF? ➥the Epopt 04:31, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

text: We missed by a little over two years then. I was at MARF in the winter of 1979-1980, then went to Groton in the initial increment of PCU No Name (SSBN-728), then went to sea on the first patrol of Ohio Blue. Out in '83, a year in civvie nuke plants (scary!), and now a Los-Angeles-based contractor working with NNPI. Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope to see your name in lots of article histories. ➥the Epopt 05:32, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reactor Operator
Talk:D2G reactor

message: It should be incorporated in the text that D2G is a pressurized water reactor. /Esquilo (talk) 08:10, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment 

message: The article claims that D2G reactor was replaced with D2W on California class cruisers. However, the provided reference is very unclear on whether D2W is a type of reactor compartment or type of reactor core: it refers to things such as "S6G with D2W core", which was a reactor compartment used by some submarines.
If D2W is, like D2G, a reactor type, should we have at least a stub page for it?
If D2W is something of a different type than D2G, then what does "replacing D2G with D2W" even mean?
Robryk (talk) 00:22, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is D2W?
Category talk:History of Kyrgyzstan

message: I have created :Category:History of the Kyrgyz people as a parent category, to hold earlier history before the independence of Kyrgyzstan. 
That includes the Soviet period. However,  has reverted the parenting of the KSSR category, stating "Previous categorization was better". 
Can we reach a consensus on what periods should be categorised under "Kyrgyzstan"? – Fayenatic London 14:31, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Considering that there are several ethnic groups living in Kyrgyzstan (and its direct predecessor, the Kyrgyz SSR) beside the Kyrgyz, I think it's best to keep everything not clearly related primarily to the Kyrgyz ethnic group in the country level category.Anonimu (talk) 14:29, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Another problem is that the area has a history predating the arrival of the Kyrgyz, and the Kyrgyz also have a history before that time.  For example, Yuezhi, recently moved to :Category:History of the Kyrgyz people, concerns events several centuries before the Kyrgyz arrived in the area.  Kanguole 15:11, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  History before independence
Talk:Tarawa-class amphibious assault ship

message: Can the class be considered technically "aircraft carriers"? The former Soviet Kiev class carried VSTOL sircraft and helicopters and were considered aircraft carriers. best 194.80.106.135 (talk) 10:37, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Aircraft carriers

message: Are the boilers on these ships the largest boiler ever aboard a ship ?Wfoj2 (talk) 01:57, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boilers 

message: Since all ships of the class have been decommissioned as of 2015 (stated in the article itself), shouldn't all verb tenses be changed from present to past?  --Seth Knops (talk • contribs) 15:12, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Three of the ships are still in the Reserve Fleet and two of those are on donation hold. FYI - wolf 22:19, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Verb tense: present or past?
Talk:Ra (board game)

message: I removed the strategy section because, although it was quite well written, it clearly violated Wikipedia's original research policy.  
I reduced the components section, per the guidelines at WP:WPBTG.
The rules also need to be reduced greatly, but that's going to take a little more work.  I'll get to it in a bit, though I welcome anyone else to take a crack at it. -Chunky Rice 00:06, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pruning article down 

message: Thinking about it, maybe we (I) should transfer this section to the Ra page of Boardgamegeek.  Seems like a good home for it.  Anyone think of a good reason why not?-Chunky Rice 00:20, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strategy section 
Talk:United States Naval Research Laboratory

message: The article needs to be extensively revised from the most recent changes, replacing WP:PR public relations baloney with actual facts, such as those that exist. Specifics are needed from sources outside the government. The current article is WP:PEACOCK for NEL NRL. It should not be. Student7 (talk) 12:57, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: , You may have been correct but this seems to not be true 7 years later. There are plenty of journal references. Yes, there are many references to NRL sites but I prefer primary sources for specifics. I am not going to rely on a news article for the NRL budget. Nobelprize.org is a primary source but I think it should be used. This is the first comment I felt I had to correct. I do not think you meant Peer Review.User-duck (talk) 06:50, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Tried to replace words that were promotional, or excessive, current with dates. Claims need citations. Accomplishments may need to be included in history, when dates for accomplishments can be found. I am on mobile device and therefore output-limited. Needs same changes in succeeding subsections. Student7 (talk) 17:32, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: , Thanks for the edits. I was primarily going through the article's references to complete them and check if they still existed. Good comments about use of "current". I agree, lots of uncited claims. There is one tidbit that I am sure is wrong but the process is to add a "citation needed". You referred to WP:PR again, this links to Wikipedia:Peer review, I think you mean "public relations baloney" User-duck (talk) 20:00, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

text: Yes. Thanks for pointing that out. Student7 (talk) 22:45, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Bullcrap
Talk:S3G reactor

message: The S3G Core 3 used Y shaped control rods in haxagonal cells in a skew-divergent arrangement.  Dog-bone fuel plates with integral coolant channels, etc.  I think you mixed your rod shapes up when you wrote this, because you otherwise nailed it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.102.236.193 (talk) 16:41, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  S3G Core 3
Talk:United States Second Fleet

message: Nice note about what it does in peacetime. I assume that in wartime it, er, breaks things and kills people?
Buckshot06 05:10, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not exactly, more like provides communications, command and control to help fighting forces not break the wrong things and kill the wrong people.Tovias 12:48, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't mean the Fleet headquarters and its C3 function. I mean the whole force, incorporating within its various task forces men, women, ships, submarines and aircraft. I very much hope they retain their capability to 'break things and kill people'. Buckshot06 12:02, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Are 38 million mi² equal to 98 Mm², or are they 130 Mm²?  The differences between statute and nautical miles are magnified when you square them.  Gene Nygaard 21:26, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What in the world are "38 million square miles of ocean"?

message: http://www.navy.mil/submit/display.asp?story_id=106814
Please insert if possible.
Sammartinlai (talk) 15:37, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. - theWOLFchild 20:19, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  New crest 

message: https://www.csis.org/events/maritime-security-dialogue-return-great-power-competition-and-second-fleet-vadm-andrew-woody
The Commander explaining the new 2nd Fleet. Video only.
Sammartinlai (talk) 13:44, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  CSIS video 

message: I shifted the section out of history to a higher section as it is recent news and prominent.
BlueD954 (talk) 02:53, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reestablishment
Talk:List of diplomatic missions of Kyrgyzstan

message: There is now a discussion at WP:FOR on the formatting and content of "List of diplomatic missions" articles. As this discussion ostensibly could affect this article, editors are encouraged to provide their opinions on the WP:FOR at this link - Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_International_relations#Formatting_of_diplomatic_missions_lists - please do not discuss on this article talk page as valid points for consideration may very well not be seen by editors at large. Thank you, --Russavia Dialogue Stalk me 00:19, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion at WP:FOR on formatting and content of "List of diplomatic missions" article
Talk:Languages of Mozambique

message: Not sure why, but Chinyanja seems to have been left off the list.  Variant of Chichewa in Malawi, spoken in Tete, Zambezia, and Niassa provinces.  The Ethnologue lists 599,000 speakers in Mozambique.  http://www.ethnologue.com/country/MZ/languages  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.220.40.14 (talk) 12:19, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Chinyanja/Chewa

message: An article of interest for anyone who wants to write more on this topic is:
Lopes, Armando Jorge. 1998. "The Language Situation in Mozambique." Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, Vol. 19, No. 5&6 http://www.multilingual-matters.net/jmmd/019/0440/jmmd0190440.pdf
--A12n 22:14, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The text tells us that about 50% of Mozambicans speak Portuguese fluently (and Mozambique tells us that in the cities it's the native language of most people), but the table numbers Portuguese speakers at 3% of the population. Largoplazo (talk) 16:21, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The apparent contradiction between data that you point us is due, in my opinion, to the fact that the 3% are L1 speakers, meaning those for whom Portuguese is the main language of use (regardless if it is the mother tongue). The 50% in the text refers to people that can speak Portuguese fluently, meaning that they are at least bilingual and another language is their L1 language.  Teixant (talk) 19:26, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Portuguese prevalence contradiction
Talk:Maine-class battleship

message: The main deck was 2.5 in (64 mm) thick and was increased slightly to 2.75 in (70 mm) on the sloped sides that connected it to the belt. The deck was increased to 4 in at the stern. There were no bevels on these battleships in the area of the citadel. The bevels were only at the extremities. --Inctructor (talk) 09:37, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Armor
Talk:Long Beach-class cruiser

message: --Two way time (talk) 04:40, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks good to me.  However there is no need to submit your change for review ... Be bold! and make them directly!  Your edits could be even better if you were to cite them to a source.  For some examples of this, check out the references in the Truxtun class cruiser article.  --Kralizec! (talk) 13:32, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Submitted for review
Talk:Center for Naval Analyses

message: redundant content on two very similar and related organizations; merging would be easier than deconflicting Chris Troutman (talk) 17:27, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Support - per nom; no good reason for separate articles.--Mojo Hand (talk) 13:33, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

text: Support - Should be merged into this article here. prokaryotes (talk) 05:35, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

text: Support - Agreed that should be merged. Since Center for Naval Analyses is part of CNA (nonprofit), this page should be merged into CNA (nonprofit). Full disclosure: I work for CNA. But since this was proposed nearly 2 years ago and has 4 supporters and no one opposed, I will execute the merger. Dsnoozer (talk) 13:47, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[CNA (nonprofit)]]
Talk:K-14 process

message: Horiuchi Color in Tokyo, Japan is still processing Kodakchrome film (K-14.) They will stop on December 20th, 2007. 218.222.43.190 03:59, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fascinating; thanks for the link.However, we'd need a better reference. Forums are not  reliable sources. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 01:28, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

message: The pictures shows Kodachrome II, which I believe is K12.  We need a picture of a K14 film! Gah4 (talk) 06:31, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  K12 

message: According to another article, K-14 uses CD-2.  That should be noted here, and a page for CD-2 created. Gah4 (talk) 04:39, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  CD-2
Talk:Talas Region

message: This article says the Capital of Talas District, Kyrgyzstan is Manas, but the district article says the capital is Kok Oy. Which is it?--DThomsen8 (talk) 16:25, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capital of Talas District 
Talk:Navy Arctic Service Ribbon

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: no consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover) BilledMammal (talk) 02:44, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Navy Arctic Service Ribbon →  – "Navy Arctic Service Ribbon" was the original name of this article, the Navy has made a change and added a Medal to accompany the ribbon. 57.140.64.15 (talk) 01:48, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 31 March 2024
Talk:Pacific Missile Range Facility

message: Looks like a drive is on to use Barking Sands for regular sat launches. Kortoso (talk) 20:08, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Satellites? 
Talk:VP-10

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/agency/navy/vp-10.htm. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Sam Sailor 10:49, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Mercy-class hospital ship

message: The article states there are currently two in the class. Have them been more at an earlier timer? --Daysleeper47 (talk) 15:02, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: number in class

message: It would be beneficial to see how the crew breaks down in numbers; How many doctors, nurses, deckies, engineers, etc the ships have.174.25.16.197 (talk) 05:07, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Crew Breakdown
Talk:John D. W. Corley

message: This article is poorly wikilinked, and does not cite references. Far more of its content is presented in lists than in prose paragraph content, which is the section that should prove the core of any article, not simply the introduction. LordAmeth 23:56, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: WP:MILHIST Assessment
Talk:United States Navy Armed Guard

message: This article and the article "Naval Armed Guard" duplicated the same subject. Looking at both articles, I merged the text from both articles into this page that now appears comprehensive.
At the same time, I have made "Naval Armed Guard" a re-direct to this "United States Navy Armed Guard" article.
Feel free to make improvements to this article.Wikited 22:37, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updated this article 

message: Though this article states that the Armed Guard was established in World War Two, I have come across references to Armed Guard units aboard ships during World War One, for example on USS St. Louis (1894). dawkeye (talk) 15:07, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You are correct. The Naval Armed Guard was first organized in WWI. They served on 384 ships and were deactivated at the end of the war, and the 1919 Neutrality Act, Sec 6 prohibited the arming of US Merchant ships. In Nov 1941, this act was repealed and the USNAG was reactivated. Oldfarm (talk) 06:10, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  World War I 

message: Dozens of American merchantmen with armed guards participated in WW1 so clearly the SS Larranga was not the first vessel with an armed guard to be used in war.--$1LENCE D00600D (talk) 04:33, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: First Use Section

message: This article is nearly incoherent.
World War I or World War II?
Details of authorizing laws, military orders?
Equipment?
Personnel: numbers, ratings, casualties?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.175.208.243 (talk) 14:52, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs a complete re-write
Talk:Beer day

message: This page is described as a stub, needs more information. Reference to the official document authorizing such for US Navy ship commanding officers, is present. Could it be found out when that document was changed to authorize this. 
USS Nimitz, spend 144 days continuous at sea in 1979-1980 in the Indian Ocean. I believe that was start of US Navy policy of a aircraft carrier nearly always in the Indian Ocean. Due to the distance and travel time to a hospitable port for shore leave, I suspect was basis of starting this policy. Previously I suspect rarely did a US Navy ship stay at sea more than 45 days without a port call. I got to 72 days at sea in Indian Ocean, and a beer day in the Indian Ocean in 1984.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.245.105.83 (talk) 16:36, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled