Talk:CREDO Mobile

message: This article warrants supervision. The weasle word designation is a good start.
Robmoney (talk) 04:48, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Enough is enough. The subsection on the Criticisms section over the company's rates vs. Sprint's is blatant original research. That blurb has been tagged for several months before and no one had offered any secondary source on the issue and no one seems interested in doing so. Wikipedia is not a soapbox, nor it is a place where people can publish their own thoughts or findings. As such, I've removed the section and will continue to remove it until someone provides sources that comply with WP's policies. hateless 18:53, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Original research

message: This article has a self-reference redirect of Working Assets, which results in ambiguous identification of the entity. The correct legal name of the company is Working Assets Funding Service, Inc. doing business as Working Assets. Working Assets provides the services CREDO Mobile (formerly Working Assets Wireless), CREDO Long Distance (formerly Working Assets Long Distance) and the Working Assets credit card [|Working Assets about]. See also Florida Public Service Commission Docket Number 070681 Acknowledgment of name change on IXC Registration No. TI063 from Working Assets Funding Service, Inc. d/b/a Working Assets Long Distance to Working Assets Funding Service, Inc. d/b/a Credo Long Distance, effective November 5, 2007[].
Does it make more sense to leave the title as CREDO as the company is generally known by the services it provides or to redirect from Credo_(company) to Working Assets?
--BoboLink81 (talk) 17:16, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: CREDO or Working Assets?

message: It is significant that Working Assets Funding Service made the Inc. 500 five consecutive years between 1992-1997 and ranked as high as 42 in 1995. If there are no complaints I will add this.--BoboLink81 (talk) 17:16, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Inc. 500

message: "...CREDO Action started an initiative called Pollworkers for Democracy, in which hired volunteers to staff polling places and ensure fair voting practices."
Besides the fact that it's grammatically incorrect, what is a "hired volunteer?" Historian932 (talk) 15:10, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terrible sentence 

message: I may add a few references and then delete the stub tag. This doesn't look like a stub to me... opinions? - Sara FB (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 16:56, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove stub tag? 

message: Article is in need of either a total rehaul or even deletion. The entire thing is a scripted sales brochure.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.242.62.125 (talk) 03:43, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: This is an ADVERTISEMENT clearly written by EMPLOYEES

message: I agree that this article is written in a clearly promotional way, indicated even by content on this talk page. It's been marked as problematic for 2 months now, so I think a major overhaul is justified. Deletion of the article, however, would be far from ideal. It should be stubbed, with basic information included in the lead section. This way it can more easily be started over with proper citations included.
It should be ok to keep some of the few pieces of information that are cited, but all that is not except for the basics should be deleted in order to make it verifiable and get rid of the promotional bias noted beforehand (on behalf of 70.231.130.234) Black Kite (talk) 21:29, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Stubbing is preferable to deletion