lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Portrait of Baldassare Castiglione

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.   — CactusWriter | needles 04:29, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: Is there a reason why the name of the sitter is spelled "Balthasar" when the title of the image is "Baldassare"? The link to the Louvre gives the spelling "Baldassare" and this is also the way it is spelled in John Pope-Hennessy's The Portrait in the Renaissance (Phaidon, 1966 p.116). Is it perhaps an effort to Anglicise the name? If so, I don't think it is necessary and it would be better for the article heading to use the same spelling as in the image and the texts. Whiteghost.ink 01:09, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I wondered the same, especially given the Wikipedia article on Baldassare Castiglione, and that all the art books I find spell it 'Baldassare'. Is there any reason not to move this to a consistent spelling? JNW (talk) 21:17, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been about a week without response so I'm assuming silent consent - so I've taken the liberty of moving the page - being BOLD :-) Feel free to revert me if this is controversial. Wittylama 09:46, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling of the subject's name
Talk:Portrait of Bindo Altoviti

message: Another murky page of the National Gallery's history: the Nazi art. --Ghirla-трёп- 07:46, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Raphael - Bindo Altoviti - Google Art Project.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on March 5, 2015. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2015-03-05. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:23, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Raphael - Bindo Altoviti - Google Art Project.jpg]] to appear as POTD 
Talk:Craig Waters

message: Brown class of 79…. Bruin79 Appreciation622 (talk) 01:24, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Craig… did you write this?
Talk:Prospero Fontana

message: A Personal life section should be added to discuss Prospero's wife and family. Sareidle (talk) 01:21, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional sections 

message: I think Prospero's biography would benefit from organization and subsection. I have looked at Wikipedia articles of artists from around this time to get ideas. Since Prospero frequently traveled to complete commissions, dividing his professional life into location-based periods does not make sense. Instead, I propose that the Biography section be renamed Professional life with subsections based on the different aspects of his artistic career, such as Collaborative work and Papal commissions. I will work on a draft in my Sandbox to see if this is an effective approach. Sareidle (talk) 03:33, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes to Biography section
Talk:Raffaellino del Colle

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- -- Thesocialistesq/M.Lesocialiste 19:00, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Sacrifice of Isaac (Caravaggio)

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  MER-C 09:18, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: Your addition of information on the symbolism and iconography was a great contribute to this article. The depth of your information allows people to understand the topic better. The symbols of objects helps paint a picture in your head of what the horn and ram was, and origins of words help better understand the true meanings to a greater extent. The way you wrote your paragraph is very clear, and easy to understand. I wouldn't take anything away, or add to your article. It looks great!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fanders1 (talk • contribs) 23:04, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Josiah's Peer Review
Talk:Saint Catherine of Alexandria (Raphael)

message: The London Gallery considers this as an early (pre-Michaelangelo) example of the use of figura serpentinata: 
   http://www.nationalgallery.org.uk/paintings/glossary/figura-serpentinata
Does anyone else have an opinion? The text here could be changed but I don't enjoy edit wars so I'm just suggesting further consideration. 67.134.206.29 (talk) 17:58, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contrapposto or figura sepentinata?
Talk:Saint Jerome in Meditation (Caravaggio)

message: Hello everyone. I was last month (mar/18) at the Montserrat Museum and realized that the Saint Jerome painting is really impressive and much more beautiful than the image on the Wikipedia article. I noticed then that the image currently used in this site is from the painting before the restoration carried out by the Prado Museum in 2005. Nowadays, the painting is lighter and the colors were adjusted, with the removal of the old varnish layers. In addition, we can now see the rock in the hand of St. Jerome, which is a very important detail for the attribution, since there is a poem of Giovanni Silos about the Giustiniani Collection, published in 1673, describing a painting of St. Jerome with a rock in his hand, mutilating the chest. For this reason, I suggest updating the current image for the one in the Montserrat Museum website (http://www.museudemontserrat.com/img/imgTxtGenerals/michelangelo-merisi-da-caravaggio-1571-1610-S_1_1753.jpg), which reflects the actual appearance of the painting after the Prado restoration. You can compare both images and note the differences.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gcatharino (talk • contribs) 05:19, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Painting image update - post-restoration
Talk:Salome with the Head of John the Baptist (Caravaggio, Madrid)

message: The main article on the painter says that's his head on the platter... I was hoping to corroborate it with this article. Is it known if this is true? – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 20:03, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Caravaggio's head on the platter?
Talk:Salvator Mundi

message: I hesitated first to link my Bavarian (Boarisch) article "Heiland" to other languages because - though it means essentially "Saviour" in the meaning "Jesus Christ", it's also used in my Bavarian Saint Sturm Bible for the God of the Old Covenant, whenever he is mentioned as a supporter of his believers in emergency. Moreover, as an old Germanic word, it originally meant any "saviour", just as with "osagyefo" in Ghana. Hellsepp 08:51, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  German/Bavarian "Heiland" 

message: News link: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304447804576413871074587708.html
Is it time to update the article, perhaps?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abvgd (talk • contribs) 01:15, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leonardo Da Vinci's painting found? 

message: According to this free paper on DOAJ, "there was a statue of the Blessing Christ holding a globe placed ca. 1230 in the northern part of Amiens Cathedral, and there is a fresco by Simone Martini (before 1341) in the tympanum of the Avignon cathedral, also showing the Blessing Christ holding a globe." Those examples are cited as "prototypes" of the Salvator Mundi's iconography.
Concerning the origin, the paper also adds £Salvator Mundi most likely derived from a fusion of two earlier types of depictions: Maiestas Domini (enthroned Christ blessing, usually in front view, holding a  book) and the Holy Face (which emerged from the Veil of Veronica and the Image of Edessa)."
Possibly, those informations may be integrated into the WP article.Micheledisaveriosp (talk) 22:27, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  13th-14th century prototypes
Talk:San Luca Altarpiece

message: The image of St. Benedict is not correct and don't refer to San Luca Altarpiece  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.222.186.230 (talk) 12:01, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:25, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:School of Ferrara

message: I notice that the dates mentioned in the Antonio_Alberti are well into the 15th century, but he's listed as 14th on this page.  Can anyone clarify?  If he was active before 1400, perhaps some of those dates should be added to his article. 71.57.124.16 (talk) 19:32, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Antonio Alberti Dates
Talk:Sebastiano Conca

message: There is a problem with the list of Conca's pupils. There is mentioned one "Drancesco Preziao"; perhaps the painter Francisco Preziado is meant. Maybe it is a scan error of the 1911 Enc. brit.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by RomFan (talk • contribs) 17:32, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Self-Portrait with a Friend

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.   — CactusWriter | needles 00:37, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Dioxippus

message: The following were inline in the article. I have moved them here. "[Perhaps this above section can be verified by the historical account by Diodorus Siculus, the main source for Quintus Curtius Rufus, especially regarding this story]"(first para) and "A discussion of the account by Diodorus Siculus is much needed." (last para). Eaglizard (talk) 00:20, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed commentary text to here 
Talk:Saint George and the Dragon (Raphael)

message: On the right hand side you can spot 2 skyscrapers that are taller and bigger than any existing buildings in 1505. So, is it an imaginary futuristic landscape, with metaphysical meaning of "life beyond dragon" or what? 2600:4041:78D0:4000:10EF:8DD4:9AF0:F270 (talk) 15:25, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: No, you are just misinformed about "existing buildings in 1505".  Both are probably intended as churches, or maybe something like the Torre del Mangia, completed 1348. Johnbod (talk) 15:38, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Skyscrapers in sight? What is the chance Raphael knew about the shape of the to be Chrysler Building in Manhattan 4 centuries later?
Talk:Saint Michael Vanquishing Satan

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Le Grand Saint Michel, by Raffaello Sanzio, from C2RMF retouched.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on December 31, 2016. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2016-12-31. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 06:37, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Le Grand Saint Michel, by Raffaello Sanzio, from C2RMF retouched.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon 

message: Should the title be Saint Michael Vanquishing Satan, as per e.g Saint Catherine of Alexandria (Raphael) etc.? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 17:09, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title 

message: — Assignment last updated by Rmmiller364 (talk) 00:10, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Renaissance Art
Talk:Saint Sebastian (Raphael)

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  MLauba (Talk) 12:57, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Cristina Mittermeier

message: The  tag is for articles that are autobiographies, have been edited extensively by the subject and/or have a fair amount of POV issues. As the article still clearly meets these criteria I am re-adding the tag. It's been removed a couple of times without sufficient explanation. If you feel it should be removed, please discuss here. --AbsolutDan (talk) 21:58, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Autobiography tag

message: This page is tagged as having POV issues as it's been edited heavily by the subject.
I've edited it to remove repetition, irrelevant information (i.e. information that's not encyclopedic) and removed links that don't go anywhere as well as tried to improve the tone of the article to make it neutral. It still lacks inline citations and is not a great article...
Thespeakingcat (talk) 17:14, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 
Talk:Cristina Pomacu

message: Having looked at various websites, the name of this Romanian athlete seems to be incorrect here. In my opinion it should be Cristiana Pomacu instead of Cristina Pomacu. I must admit that both the German Wikipedia and sports-reference.com are not of much help here, but shouldn't be the IAAF profile be leading in this case? And that profile gives Cristiana Pomacu. Regards, Piet.Wijker (talk) 13:32, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Cristiana Pomacu instead of Cristina Pomacu
Talk:The Beheading of Saint John the Baptist (Caravaggio)

message: Who is depicted in the shadows on the right hand side of the painting?  Grandma Roses (talk) 15:14, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Two of John's followers, I'd imagine, peering in through a barred window. Johnbod (talk) 17:04, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unidentified character 

message: This painting ought to be seen and described for what it is and not entered into a subjective rating system in the very first paragraph. It encourages the idea that works of art are in competition with each other, a projection surely, one generated by art critics and supported by the public. Giving us the opinions of two critics, neither of whom is actually telling us anything important ('the best', 'important' etc)seems like a missed opportunity; immodest and so the very opposite of what the artist would have wanted for his labour. 
Please consider a different approach. Thank you. M.H.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.127.10.100 (talk) 08:19, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove the Head
Talk:The Crowning with Thorns (Caravaggio, Vienna)

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Michelangelo Merisi, called Caravaggio - The Crowning with Thorns - Google Art Project.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on April 1, 2018. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2018-04-01. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:55, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Michelangelo Merisi, called Caravaggio - The Crowning with Thorns - Google Art Project.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon
Talk:The Deposition (Michelangelo)

message: Some of this article was copied word-for-word from http://www.wga.hu/frames-e.html?/html/m/michelan/1sculptu/pieta/pieta_.html. This should probably be paraphrased and then the source cited. 64.113.26.204 19:12, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

message: Almost all sources use Florentine Pietà, even the ones cited and in the bibliography. The term "Depposition" is much less used. Eccekevin (talk) 22:19, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page should be renamed Florentine Pietà
Talk:The Entombment (Michelangelo)

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that the featured picture :File:Entombment Michelangelo.jpg, which is used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for April 2, 2021. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2021-04-02. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:24, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  File:Entombment Michelangelo.jpg scheduled for POTD
Talk:The Inspiration of Saint Matthew

message: I hardly think it's supposed to be erotic nudging, that makes no sense whatsoever. It's supposed to be her guiding his arm like a teacher would a child.
82.42.128.51 (talk) 20:34, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  I replaced "erotic nudging" with "direct assistance", because there's nothing erotic about the original painting.  I also removed the word "nubile" in describing the angel in the original painting because this also implies sexual attractiveness/maturity, and again doesn't seem to fit the painting.  Not sure who wrote that description, but they seemed to have something else on the mind. Dave (talk) 13:47, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  erotic nudging??
Talk:The Lute Player (Caravaggio)

message: I'm confused, the text talks about the Giustiniani version being an earlier version
than the one in the Wildenstein collection, however the dates for the paintings indicate
the opposite.Sovietbot 15:49, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

message: The Badminton House painting came to light at auction in Sotheby's, New York (January 25, 2001, lot 179). Sothebys has no record of this auction, at least not at that date. Is this a typo??? --98.232.176.109 (talk) 19:36, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Auction date?
Talk:Cullen Jones

message: In July 2008, the article said: "Jones is the first African-American to hold or share a world record (4x100 Freestyle Relay) in swimming. He is also the first African-American to make the US Olympic swimming team." The following changes have been made without citation, but seemingly in harmony with the other relevant bios:
*2nd to achieve a world record
*2nd on US Olympic Swim team
*3rd on US Olympic swim team.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR)  20:38, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  1st/2nd/3rd African American 