lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Universally measurable set

message: So it seems I goofed in my first definition; looking around, everyone seems to impose some finiteness condition on the measure. Does this actually matter? Can someone cook up a universally measurable set of reals that's not measurable with respect to, say, Hausdorff measure of dimension 1/2 ? --Trovatore 16:27, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: You asked me to comment on this. Unfortunately, my set theoretic knowledge is rather limited. In particular, I don't know what Polish spaces or analytic sets are. So, can't help much. Oleg Alexandrov 03:55, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Finiteness condition

message: In the section "Example contrasting with Lebesgue measureability", it says that "Thus we can think of A as a subset of the interval [0,1], and evaluate its Lebesgue measure".  Later is says "there are some such A without a well defined Lebesgue measure".  It is unclear whether the "some such A" in the second statement refers to a set not in 2^omega or whether the first statement should have said "attempt to evaluate its Lebesgue measure". Tashiro (talk) 15:57, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Some such A ?

message: Hello, I suggest properties of universally measurable sets should be added. Such that whether intersections and unions (countable?) are universally measurable, and continuous images and preimages. Thank you 148.252.128.209 (talk) 08:26, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing properties
File talk:IE expansion.png

message: There is good map. But there are several mistakes:
1) Corsica and Sardinia were not Indo-European up to 1000 BC,
because its population (Corses and Sardes) are described by
ancient authors as relatives of non-Indoeuropean Hispanic
Iberes. Romanisation of these islands was made to 1st cent. AD.
2) Eastern Spain was home of non-Indoeuropean Iberes and
this area was romanisated up to 1st cent. AD.
3) In Scandinavia Northern Bronze Age culture which associated
with Indo-Europeans spread to Norway and more large part of Sweden.
4) Estonia had no significant Indo-European population and generally
border between Finnic and Baltic populations was Daugava (Dvina River)
in today Latvia.
5) It is believed that in migration in Europe Indo-Europeans is
divided to 2 branch: northern (Paleoeuropeans - ancesors of
Celts, Illyrians, Italics, Venets, Germans, Slavs and Balts) and
southern (ancesors of Greeks, Thracians, Phrygyans and Armenians).
Border between these two branch was Carpatian mountains.
6) Up to 1000 BC nor Crete nor Cyprus were not Indo-European which
is fixed in historical accounts.
7) It is believed in Kurgan hypothesis and is evidenced from
historical and linguistical data that Anatolians came from
Agean Sea basin (for example Carians).
8) Armenian Highlands was not Indo-European up to 800 BC. Its
population were predominantly Caucasian-speaking Hurrians and
Urartians.
9) About Tocharians: from linguistical data is known that Tocharians
is strongly contacted with Finno-Ugric tribes. From this and
archeological accounts it is believed that ancesors of Tocharians
were population of Fatyanovo culture (central Russia). When and
by which way Tocharians came to Sinkiang (Western China) is not
known, but because slightly linguistical contacts between Tocharian
and Iranic languages proposed that migration went through forest
zone (not steppe).
Generally I think that it will better correct map.
Dmitry Krotko (til@bigmir.net).
yes, all your points are valid, and the map would be improved by implementing them. 
Just bear in mind that the map was never supposed to be a rough sketch of the Kurgan framework, it doesn't pretend to have more resolution than the general direction of the crudely-drawn arrows, so you shouldn't attempt to give it more resolution that it can reasonably have. Perhaps a lower-resolution map should be used. --dab (𒁳) 10:43, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Talk:Gromov–Witten invariant

message: I just fixed an anonymous edit, which seemed well-intentioned but didn't work so well. Essentially the editor made two changes. First, s/he changed notation from n to k; both are used in the subject, but n is used in the stable map article, so I think n should be kept. Also, the editor did not thoroughly do the change, but petered out in the middle. Second, s/he confused the moduli space of curves M_{g, n} (which has nothing to do with the target X) with the moduli space of maps M_{g, n}(X, A). I have explicitly written the latter into the article, in an attempt to clarify. Also, it is undesirable to fix the domain, \Sigma, as the editor did, since we want to consider maps on all domains in M_{g, n}. If the edit was sincere and I'm wrong, let me know; we can work it out. Joshuardavis 16:47, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

message: The statement:
The evaluation map sends the fundamental class of M to a d-dimensional rational homology class in Y, denoted
The articles defines Y = M \times \sigma^k.    The evaluation map is from Y to X^k; so, how could the ev map send a class in M to a class in Y?  
15:30, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you have a couple of typos there. The evaluation map being used here goes from StableMaps to StableCurves x X^k. I have adjusted the article to make it all more explicit. Let me know if there is an error. Joshua R. Davis (talk) 17:17, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

text: I had a typo; that should be X^n, not X^k. Joshua R. Davis (talk) 18:45, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this correct? 

message: This page should have more information about the basic technical details for Gromov-Witten theory. A good reference for this material is http://www.math.columbia.edu/~ccliu/GWsummer17/GWsummer17.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.212.185.82 (talk) 05:30, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended Technical Discussion Needed
Talk:Homunculus patagonicus

message: Why not just make all of the information on the genus page instead of splitting it into 2 pages? Augustios Paleo (talk) 02:36, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with genus page? 

message: Please see the discussion at Talk:List_of_fossil_primates_of_South_America#Taxonomy. Thanks! - UtherSRG (talk) 20:13, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fossil NWM reorganization
Talk:Functional selectivity

message: "and that this characteristic will be consistent with all effector systems coupled to that receptor" Can you point to a published source for the "dogma" that this is part of the definition of agonists and antagonists? --JWSchmidt 17:13, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Agonists, inverse agonists, antagonists, functional selectivity.  There are too many variations in individual definitions of all of these.  I often hear inverse agonists being described as antagonists by knowledgable people in pharmacology,  because when they were educated, there was nothing other than the on / off dogma associated with the terms.  The problem in clarification extends too to binding sites of receptors.  There should be a difference in name between agonists which work at the same binding site of a receptor and those which do not.  I hereby motion that we raise this issue, whether it be here on wikipedia or in a conference to discuss this issue so that the confusion does not continue into the future.--Carlwfbird 05:12, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "Functional selectivity (or 'agonist trafficking', 'biased agonism', 'ligand bias', and 'differential engagement' ) is the ligand-dependent selectivity..."
Hint: circular definitions are a bad thing. I'd fix this lead myself if I weren't one of the people resorting to Wikipedia to understand what selectivity means in biochemistry.—PaulTanenbaum (talk) 20:22, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: We need a Pluto Talk

message: Somebody wants to understand what selectivity means in biochemistry, resorts to Wikipedia, and is treated to this introductory passage:
:"Functional selectivity (or 'agonist trafficking', 'biased agonism', 'ligand bias', and 'differential engagement' ) is the ligand-dependent selectivity..."
Hint: circular definitions are a bad thing. I'd fix this lead myself if I weren't one of the people resorting to Wikipedia to understand what selectivity means in biochemistry.—PaulTanenbaum (talk) 20:22, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  The lead is '''way''' weak
Talk:Grid (graphic design)

message: Why is the grid system related to feng shui?—Gniw (Wing) 16:47, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no relationship. At all. CApitol3 20:24, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Feng Shui?

message: It is hard to say why it has taken so many years for web developers to become interested in something that has been essential to the written medium in general since the 30s.
And it's actually pretty easy to say why it has taken so many years - designing with grids with CSS/HTML just IS a bit more difficult than using InDesign... 
77.246.198.145 (talk) 20:55, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that the sentence try to say that there's no obvious single reason about it, but a lot of cooperating reasons that nobody could tell how much weight they had on that issue. I would replace that text with something like: "The web developed slowly techniques to apply print grid systems to pages and even today the process isn't automatic as much as you can achieve with softwares like InDesign for print: grids are still relatively hard to build, and it's not something given, making them an explicit choice instead of a stated foundation." --Folletto (talk) 14:38, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: very insightful...

message: There is NO description of a typographic grid and how it works, which should be the essential  content of this entry.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.218.233.156 (talk) 06:34, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The article needs to be expanded to include grid use in developing type styles and individual graphics such as logos. I'm going to rename the article to "Grid (graphic design)" and hopefully it will invite other editors in the wikiproject graphic design or wikiproject visual arts to expand it. Oicumayberight (talk) 18:14, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Description

message: Before the invention of movable type a based on optimal proportions had been used to arrange handwritten text on pages.
''
Sentence is missing a subject.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnbro27 (talk • contribs) 14:39, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing subject
Talk:Agonist

message: How does "Functional Selectivity" broaden "the conventional definition of pharmacology"? --JWSchmidt 17:16, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Functional Selectivity

message: can we have a nice functional list of some examples of agonists? i believe it would be helpful, while also lengthening this article. --Alveolate 04:41, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: List of Agonists

message: Agonists, inverse agonists, antagonists, functional selectivity.  There are too many variations in individual definitions of all of these.  I often hear inverse agonists being described as antagonists by knowledgable people in pharmacology,  because when they were educated, there was nothing other than the on / off dogma associated with the terms.  The problem in clarification extends too to binding sites of receptors.  There should be a difference in name between agonists which work at the same binding site of a receptor and those which do not.  I hereby motion that we raise this issue, whether it be here on wikipedia or in a conference to discuss this issue so that the confusion does not continue into the future.--Carlwfbird 05:14, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: We need a Pluto Talk

message: Partial agonists can act as antagonists, as in the presence of agonists....as in reads like they are the same agonist=partial agonist. The point I was originally trying to make is ...in the presence of an agonist... when both agonist and partial agonist are present...
140.203.12.241 15:09, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Partial agonist antagonism

message: I am proposing a review of naming of articles with the keywords "agonism" and "agonist" in order to improve accessibility via the disambiguation page and, therefore, general searches on these two words as well as more immediate subject area identification from some of the articles' names themselves.
I propose that this article be renamed, "Agonist (biochemical)".
Please see my section 1n "Talk:Agonist (disambiguation) 'Add link to article "Physiological agonism and antagonism" and review Agonism/Agonist article naming'".
Assuming there are no contrary opinions or improved suggestions within a couple of weeks, I'll go ahead and make these proposed changes.Hedles (talk) 00:39, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested retitle -  "Agonist (biochemical)"
Talk:Alectrosaurus

message: Note: taxobox entries currently provisional and experimental => I wish to find a way to include a section for age and locality (or more appropriate titles for such) do not delete.
Bolesey 17:16, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

message: DinoData lists it as not a dinosaur.  User:Jntg4
:You'll notice DinoData has several listings for alectrosaurus, which correspond to different animals that have been given that name or referred to that genus. A few are not dinosaurs, the original is.Dinoguy2 16:17, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dinosaur status
Talk:History of the United States House of Representatives

message: I see that Rjensen is continuing to revert to include his pet scheme of American history in this article. For more on this, including Rjensen's insistence, when convenient, that the Party Systems are only appropriate for Presidential elections (why, then, mention them in this article?), follow   this link. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 19:00, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rjensen

message: Readers with questions such as: What was the largest Democratic majority ever in the House? Or: When was the first Republican elected to the House and how many other Republicans served with him? might expect to find a table in this article showing not only the biennial election results, but also the results of replacement elections along the way.--Bhuck (talk) 12:45, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Table showing partisan distribution 1789-present 
Talk:Proconsul major

message: If the animal is estimated at 50kg, then it most certainly was not "roughly the size of a gorilla"...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.187.251.185 (talk) 04:57, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Size

message: * Merge - Either Ugandapithecus major is the junior synonym of Proconsul major, or Ugandapithecus major is the new name for Proconsul major.  Either way, they are the same species, and should only have one article. - [Proposed by NessieVL on 12 February 2019]
*Merge both into Proconsul with a discussion of the various taxonomic suggestions that have been made. --Kevmin § 17:31, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposing merge of ''Proconsul major'' and ''Ugandapithecus major''
Talk:Proconsul africanus

message: This looks to me like a write-up of only one skull, especially the part about lacking the supraorbital ridge. The species cannot have lacked that, but it may be missing on one or more specimens. I suggest a rewrite for generalization purposes.Dave 14:38, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Morphology write-up

message: I had to do a paper on this primate, and I have the following references to offer: 
T. Harrison and P. Andrews. (2009). The anatomy and systematic position of the early Miocene proconsulid from Meswa Bridge, Kenya. Journal of Human Evolution 56(5), 479-496.
Alan Walker, Dean Falk, Richard Smith & Martin Pickford. (1983). The skull of Proconsul africanus: reconstruction and cranial capacity. Nature 305, 525-527.doi:10.1038/305525a0 
Proctor, Robert N. (2005). Finding Life in Old Bones. [Review of the book  The Ape in the Tree:An Intellectual and Natural History of Proconsul Science 309(5738), 1188.doi:10.1126/science.1112101 
Senobyte (talk) 07:01, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional Sources
Talk:Tomsk State University

message: Articles on individual departments should in general be merged into articles for the university. DGG (talk) 08:27, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal

message: This article seems heavily outdated, I have a few suggestions to make, But i am not sure if i must directly edit them, So i am just asking the opinion of those who might be interested
#Shouldn't we delete the "Computer Science" record of the faculties table since it has been replaced by the Institute of Applied Mathematics and Computer Sciencehttp://en.tsu.ru/schools_and_departments/
#There is no university newspaper in this institution, But the overview section has a "newspaper" row that oddly states "Alma mater" as the newspaper, That should be removed right?
#The official webpage says there are only 16000 students in the universityhttp://en.tsu.ru/about/tsu_facts.php, The overview sections puts it at 23000
I hope these questions arent dumb and i am sorry i wasted your time!  -- KindCowboy69 ☮ 07:50 AM January 8, 2021 07:50, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article revival
Talk:Lucent Technologies

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved in the absence of any objections  Colin M (talk) 18:15, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Lucent →  – Usually I am more in favour of shorter names, but in this case I think that the longer name is better. Lucent used "Technologies" in their logo. And it makes it more clear it is about a technology company. PhotographyEdits (talk) 13:38, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 19 April 2024
Talk:Robinson Canó

message: I'm pretty sure that most of these images (other than his player bio pic) are all copyrighted but I'm not positive, can anyone clarify this for me?
Any picture used of him, unless it is a work of the US federal government, is copyrighted. --AEMoreira042281 16:16, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright

message: Robinson Cano is african american  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.96.226.156 (talk) 02:47, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No.  He wasn't born in America. --Muboshgu (talk) 03:12, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Background

message: The controversy surrounding Cano's actions as captain of the AL team as well as his performance at the event and fan reactions absolutely need to be included.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.229.37.27 (talk) 22:40, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Why? What makes this event important enough to include? It happened, and it's over. Wikipedia is not a newspaper. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:20, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: 2012 HR Derby Fiasco

message: As an aficionado hispanoparlante, I thought this player's last name was being mispronounced when I first heard it. Its "usual" pronunciation is CA no, not ca NO. However, I just checked his page en español at https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robinson_Canó, and saw that they do indeed list him as Canó there. So I think the pronounciation should be listed that way on his English language page. ¿Qué piensan USTEDES? What do YOU think? DutchmanInDisguise (talk) 04:08, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciation of Surname

message: Go to 2017,first 2 paragraphs and Personal Life,put accent over o in last name. Can't find symbol for that. Thanks and have a good day.2601:581:8500:949C:304C:CD3D:3958:6A95 (talk) 14:19, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Punctuation Omissions.
Talk:Articles Declaratory of the Constitution of the Church of Scotland

message: It is not appropriate to put the text of document in Wikipedia. Instead we should write about the document. It may be approprite to add the text to Wikisource. DJ Clayworth 17:55, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Then why didn't you move it to Wikisource and build in a link?  Just deleting has not helped anyone.  Incidentally, I don't agree that the text of a very short document cannot belong in a Wikipedia article.  Many articles on songs contain the lyrics; sometimes separating text from commentary is not helpful.  --Doric Loon 20:03, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Knight Rider (film)

message: Question:When asked about his role, he hinted that he would return as Michael Knight, but that Knight was taking over Devon Miles' position as the leader of FLAG. Incidentally, this is an unlikely possibility as Devon Miles was killed back in 1990's Knight Rider 2000, and actor Edward Mulhare passed away in 1997.If Devon/Mulhare died... wouldn't it be logical for Michael Knight to take over? I'd call this obvious, not unlikely. // Gargaj 18:04, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

message: AICN thinks it's fake.  Does anyone have any evidence to the contrary? --Maxamegalon2000 03:46, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Too many questions for my comfort, from a cursory Google. I was bold and removed it until we have something from Weinstein (AICN isn't terribly trustworthy). --JStalk 06:20, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Poster 

message: Let me explain  in the text, in case you're curious. The page linked to is simply podcasts of a radio show out of England, I'm assuming the show Hasselhoff appeared on to make this statement. However, it is temporal -- the page linked to is a moving target and has already forgotten the statement. We need a better citation.
That applies to the whole article, really. I'm having trouble citing this stuff through Google, I hope interested parties or original author can. I also deleted a lot of irrelevant fluff. --JStalk 19:43, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rework and templates
Talk:Distance geometry

message: It seems that the term is only used for molecules structure?? Tosha 18:14, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Molecules structure

message: Probably, the most "real-life application" is GPS? — Mikhail Ryazanov (talk) 08:18, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Applications 

message: A series of edits were done on this article on November 11 by user:Toninowiki, who destroyed all references to higher dimensions, which are crucial to the point of the article.  Now someone in another forum is telling me that my link to this article is not much appreciated because it doesn't go into higher dimensions.  I've restored the material that was destroyed. Michael Hardy (talk) 21:22, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Destruction of material by Toninowiki 

message: There are numerous symbols used in the article that are nowhere defined.
This is a terrible idea for an encyclopedia article.
I hope someone can define in the article the symbols tA, tB, tC, and dij, among others. 2601:200:C000:1A0:D814:9114:E269:A7A7 (talk) 18:51, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: They're defined:  and d is defined in the sentence beginning  MrOllie (talk) 18:55, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article could use a good deal of improvement 

message: Under “Characterization via Cayley–Menger determinants” it is noted that the following results are proved in Blumenthal's book [12].
Unfortunately, that's wrong. The results presented by Wikipedia only roughly reflect Blumenthal's work and contain errors. 
This can easily be checked by means of a simple counterexample: According to Blumenthal, the semimetric space with the distance matrix
0     3     4     8
3     0     1     4
4     1     0     2
8     4     2     0
cannot be embedded in any space Rn, but according to the Wikipedia article it can, namely for n=3.
The Cayley-Menger determinants given by the principal submatrices with elements of the 4, the first 3 and the first 2 lines satisfy the embedding conditions of Wikipedia. However, the remaining three triangles of the potential tetrahedron do not fulfill the triangle inequality.
These misrepresentations of the central theorem of distance geometry are not peanuts.
~~~~
K2357W (talk) 09:24, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content error