Talk:Tanzimat

message: Is the Tanzimat Fermani also known as the Gulhane Decree?  144.89.180.225 (talk) 15:03, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments 

message: I am looking for any info on the Ottoman Land Law of 1858 and am somewhat shocked that there is nothing here about it. LamaLoLeshLa (talk) 18:36, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where is info on the impact of the tanzimat in places like palestine? 

message: For example non-muslims allowed to army in 1826 with abolishing of janissary system and many nonmuslims opposed this so in 1839 with tanzimat nonmuslims were given the privalege of paying tax rather than serving in the military whereas every muslim citizens had to serve 4 years. OzhanTR (talk) 21:00, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  topics that tanzimat covered need corrections 

message: Specific dates and names available at "Tanzimat" entry in First encyclopaedia of Islam: 1913-1936 (pp. 650s). — LlywelynII 19:51, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Source

message: Regnal Chronologies has the Kapudan Pasha pushed out of his province and replaced by a wali and vilayet structure in 1848, which seems early. Does anyone have a source for the reform of the navy? — LlywelynII 19:51, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Kapudan Pasha]]

message: This entire section and contribution appears to be ahistorical - revisionist history provided by FaithMatters and Ishtaq Hussain. He has no expertise on this matter and his paper on the faith matters website makes clear he is opposing political movements so his paper is polemical rather than WP:NPOV.  A rewrite may need to be done. 182.188.184.190 (talk) 13:37, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Tanzimat]]

message: Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted.
Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia.
This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link.
If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting.
If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page.
If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta.
When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags.
The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true.
Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
*http://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/14/62/10/PDF/LafiEminonuOttomanReforms.pdf
*:Triggered by \bhalshs\.archives-ouvertes\.fr on the global blacklist
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 15:22, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page 

message: *  (info page on book at Martin Luther University) // CITED: p. 39 (PDF p. 41/338).
...said that, during Ottoman times, the grammar usage "Le Tanzimat" (instead of "Les Tanzimat") was common.
WhisperToMe (talk) 08:56, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammar in French during Ottoman times 

message: We do not need three citations for a part of a single paragraph and no citations for whole sections. See WP:OVERCITE and WP:CITE. —¿philoserf? (talk) 18:17, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  On citations