lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Prithvi Narayan Shah

message: Not sure if this material is of use? I suspect it's copyright as it is a direct copy from here by User:Dpsannu. MidgleyDJ 08:56, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved this from [[King Prithivi Narayan Shah]]

message: It has no record whatsoever.
It's a Persian honorific, from the same root as Kshatriya.  I don't think they actually called themselves "Shah" until later on, maybe after the lifetime of Prithvi Narayan.  It would be good to document this, and to find out what their previous name was. 
"Rana" may be another honorific.  What are its origins and when did it come into play? 76.80.9.100 17:36, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The ancestors of those who called themselves "Shah" were known as "Khan" (Mincha Khan, etc).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 113.199.146.131 (talk) 19:05, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  When did the royal family add "Shah" to their name? 

message: Kathmandu was the capital of Nepal before Prithvi Narayan Shah. 
See Page 50 of
https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:C8hQgCDo-QUJ:himalaya.socanth.cam.ac.uk/collections/journals/ancientnepal/pdf/ancient_nepal_25_05.pdf+kuti+necbal&hl=en&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESi1sCufbZ0miDrM87qYQinPM-tdnLbKdy_9dVkkHEDDtBrFP0WMe5YCb8ugsjinxRuW5wg8jKoxs34VWa0NrMQE-EIVTF4XkqE_fBaCIaehWaSTSd667Yba6th7UQufXvovZL_H&sig=AHIEtbSJJa1YFxA2dpP--Pxsz3HtiKVAQA  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 113.199.146.131 (talk) 19:21, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capital of Nepal 

message: The article isn't written from an inclusive perspective of history. Just like the history of Colombus, the divide between Indigenous and Whites; the Australia Day debate; the Hitler for Jews, etc. Prithvi Narayan Shah also has controversial history. Wikipedia rules allows things from neutral point of view. The article over powers the narrative of 'unification' and dismisses the narrative of 'colonization'. Future editors need to present both the sides of arguments together juxtaposed to maintain inclusivity of history.
- नेपालीमुक्ती (talk) 13:31, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclusive history 

message: Need an intro 113.199.230.215 (talk) 14:22, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks 2405:ACC0:1204:1D03:ED14:E27E:A834:D9A2 (talk) 01:01, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prithivi Narayan Shah
Talk:Islam in the Dominican Republic

message: The subsection "Slave Revolt of 1522" violates Wikipedia's guidelines for copyright infringement:
* "copying material without the permission of the copyright holder from sources that are not public domain or compatibly licensed (unless it's a brief quotation used in accordance with Wikipedia's non-free content policy and guideline) is likely to be a copyright violation. Even inserting text copied with some changes can be a copyright violation if there is substantial linguistic similarity in creative language or sentence structure; this is known as close paraphrasing, which can also raise concerns about plagiarism."
The section is nearly identical to the content from the published book Black Crescent: The Experience and Legacy of African Muslims in the Americas.  The original editor was notified of the copyright infringement, however the section has not been re-worded.  The section has been removed in order to meet Wikipedia guidelines.--Djrun (talk) 23:20, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slave Revolt of 1522 
Talk:2005 Belgian Grand Prix

message: This is almost entirely lifted from another site.  Whilst that site is credited, it seems like a copy and advert rather than actual article.  GollyG 17:46, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No offense but it doesn't look like you are familiar with Formula One racing. I have just rated this article as "Start-Class" because it does not yet have a race report - only the results from the race and the qualifying session, along with some notes. As with any competitive sporting event, there are bound to be similarties between the different accounts of what happened, and obviously the official results should be the same. Bobby Doorknobs 21:04, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio ?!
Talk:Labour Party Young Socialists

message: I have proposed to merge this page with Young Socialists (UK) because the pages overlap quite a lot and because it is confusing to have to go back and forth between two pages. Tamino 17:48, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merger with ''Young Socialists''
Talk:Han Myeong-sook

message: I'm moving this to Han Myeong Sook, as that is the official spelling on the OPM official website.  -- Visviva 04:28, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: Now that the 2007 presidential election has concluded, there should be some explanation of her fate in this election in the article. Robert K S (talk) 00:28, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  She's not president 

message: Article say she was the only female prime minister in South Korea. But Chang Sang was prime minister in 2002.--85.226.42.206 (talk) 18:25, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Only female prime minister? What about Chang Sang?  
Talk:Elbląg Canal

message: The fact that this canal was built by the Prussians is covered in the history secion. Feel free to add detail. Unless there are separate lists relating to Polish, German, Lithuanian and Ukrainian histories of technology in Poland, the addition of the word German in the opening paragraph is not relevent. Martin Cordon 11:43, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  German history of Technology 

message: Since the boats are carried dry in cradles these are technically marine railways.  Inclined planes carry the boats in caissons.  I'll put this on my "to do" list unless anyone has strong feelings to the contrary. Martin of Sheffield (talk) 10:12, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marine railway vs inclined plane
Talk:Tuebrook

message: Some road signs in the area actually call it Tue Brook - is there any definitive source on whether Tuebrook or Tue Brook is (more) correct? Ccw34 (talk) 16:27, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:The Prettiest Star

message: I'm pretty sure this isn't a remix... the original single, and the version on the 'Sound + Vision' box were both released in mono only, while the designation "Bolan" is simply a reference to it being the original 1970 recording, featuring Marc Bolan, as opposed to the 1973 'Aladdin' version, the stero version having been unreleased before 'Best of 69/74'. So in short it's just a stero version of the original song =)
Tom Prankerd 18:08, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bolan Stereo Mix... 
Talk:Ashita no Joe

message: I have seen this page and many others state that Ashita no Joe 2 covers the six volumes that Ashita no Joe did not. This simply is not true. According to IMDB, The first episode synopsis brings up the fight with Rikiishi and Joe's departure. Carlos comes in some episodes later. The first series ends on Joe's match against Carlos. Some overlap exists, and I corrected it as such. I thought I corrected it before but it may have gotten reverted. I do not know how to provide citation regarding this as my links do not directly prove which volumes are which, but seeing as the false statement didn't use or need citation, it wouldn't be unfair to simply make my case without it either. 2600:1702:18F0:5180:C4C3:E4BC:8D5:F01C (talk) 19:17, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Imdb is pretty much not reliable source since it is edited by other users. Still, I would suggest changing the the whole of "covers six volumes" since that's pretty much original research. For example, it would be "the second series focuses on Rikishi's death onwards" if I recall.Tintor2 (talk) 20:04, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I already changed it, but I didn't add any sources. Other sources I could find also contain links to the episodes themselves, so I'm certain I can't use those. That said, the previous sentence is structured similarly. Would that also count as original research? Lastly, I'd like to avoid spoiling if people wish to skip over the plot section, so I'd rather say something like the first ends after Carlos's arc, while the second starts from the conclusion of Rikiishi's arc. 2600:1702:18F0:5180:FD86:CB73:4D99:4C3F (talk) 21:00, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second Anime Coverage
Talk:Saturn Outlook

message: I think it's a mistake to call the Ford Explorer, Toyota Forerunner, and Nissan Pathfinder similar vehicles.  All of those are true truck based SUV's, not "crossovers.".  This group of vehicles from GM is being compared more to other car based SUV's like the Toyota Highlander as reflected in the prior edition of this page.  Ultimate ed 18:09, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: They were later changed to full-size SUVs.  I changed the list to mid-size crossover SUVs.  Truck-based SUVs shouldn't be compared with car-based crossover SUVs no matter large they are.  I didn't add the Toyota Highlander because the current gen is smaller than these new models; the next gen should be more similar.  --Vossanova o< 17:59, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Similar Vehicles

message: OK, I thought the Outlook was a CUV, but I read my newspaper's automotive section today and it called the Outlook a full-size wagon. Which is correct? Should I change the article?
Bkissin 01:30, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wagon or CUV? 
Talk:Babylon 5/to do

message: Languages Section
* Andreas Katsulas does not use a British accent in playing G'Kar.  It's more correct to call that "standard English" or "mid-Atlantic English." 
Religion Section
* The Jesuits are not a different religion. They are a religious order of men (ie. priests, deacons and brothers) within the Catholic Church. 
Well written
* Weak Pass.
** Further improve: Work on overall flow. The sections do not gel well with each other as a single article. Transitions need to be better. Too many lists that could be broken off or turned into prose. Subcategories should be parallel in format. Done
Factually Accurate
* Failed. Citations.
**Provide some sort of reference to avoid the appearance of original research: WP:CITE.
Broad Coverage
* Passed. Many strengths.
**Further improve: More on international reception.
NPOV
*Passed. 
Stable
* Passed.
Appropriate Images
* Passed.
** Further improve: Caption quality needs to be consistent. "Another shot of the Babylon 5 station" is inadequate being that the largest object in the photo is a planet of some sort which is unidentified. Done
Real-world context for articles dealing with fiction
* Failed. Too fan centric: 
**"Cast and primary characters" section: List should be Actor, Character (not other way around). The real-world context is an actor played a character (encyclopedia) - not the character was brought to life by an actor (fansite). Done Koweja 18:50, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED FOR [[WP:GA]]
Talk:RS300

message: how do i connect the rs300 page into the bit a the bottom that lists the world-wide list of sailing classes?? 
many thanks
:The bit at the bottom is a template. There are two:  and . You can change them by visiting Template:International Dinghies and Template:Sailing Dinghies and Skiffs respectively. --Commander Keane 18:19, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

message: The RS300 is no longer marketed or built by RS Sailing. It is I believe nominally available from https://www.theboatyardatbeer.com/ although I'm not sure how many they actually build. 212.159.44.170 (talk) 19:13, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  RS300 Builder
Talk:Julie Dreyfus

message: From where do you get this unpublished information ? 
Julie Dreyfus grandfather was  Émile Dreyfus, born in 1886, son of  Jules Dreyfus, born in July 1842, himself son of Léopold Dreyfus and Jeanne Wooghttp://roglo.eu?lang=en;templ=ergo.
As the famous Captain Dreyfuss was born in 1859, we can see how stupid this assumption is !
31.39.161.151 (talk) 11:23, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:   "Her grandfather was a descendant of the famous Captain Alfred Dreyfus" 

message: Was it Julie Dreyfus in CSI Miami, episode "Pirated", as the officer in charge of the coastguard ship at the beginning ?   
The actress certainly looked a lot like her.  If not, who was it ?   Darkman101 (talk) 14:26, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was Julie Dreyfus in CSI Miami ?
Talk:The Beach (Toronto)

message: I hope this doesn't seem too presumptuous, but I set a redirect to this page from "The Beaches". I figured that since the name has been decided in a local vote, retaining the old name may itself smack of POV-ism at this point. Hence the switch to this new page, but without the histrionics that 142.240.200.10 has typically added in the past.
If you think I was wrong for doing so, let me know, and revert away. Expect a good discussion on the issue though.
And just for the record, I was for the plural form of the name (and voted accordingly). Captmondo 18:22, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Kudos for being bold!  But given the controversy, I think going the way of Wikipedia:Requested moves would have been far preferable.  The BIA vote is arguably not determinative -- I suspect people will have strong opinions about this, and even the BIA is saying that the vote was to decide street sign names, nothing more.  I don't have a strong opinion on the speedy delete of The Beach (Toronto), but I do strongly believe that The Beaches should not be merged until consensus has been obtained that the merger is appropriate.  Skeezix1000 19:59, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect page
Talk:Roussel de Bailleul

message: The chronology is a little out of sync with the French Wiki. Srnec 18:24, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why does the article say he was a Frank or a Norman?  In the Alexiad, Anna clearly stated that he was a Celt.Leo-Isaurus-Rex (talk) 18:35, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Because Byzantine authors (and Anna Komnene more than usual) took classical authors as a model, hence showing a very marked tendency to imitate them both in language and content, which led them to naming every people after their Classical analogues, i.e. the Franks as "Celts", the Turks as "Persians", the Bulgarians/Rus'/Magyars as "Scythians", etc. 94.64.239.217 (talk) 19:23, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roussel's Ancestry 

message: The final paragraph of the article, describing the year of and circumstances of Roussel’s death is contradicted by primary source Michael Attaleiates (c. 1022-1080) who has Roussel marching against John Bryennios in 1078, not against Nikephoros Botaneiates.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.115.36.132 (talk) 22:47, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Final Years
Talk:Rush Hour 2

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:02, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: The Region 1 DVD claims it has subtitles, but it does not. Good luck with the accents. Varlaam (talk) 06:51, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  DVD release 

message: It needs to be updated. It took place in Paris and not the rumored Moscow. Feb 26 2012  — Preceding unsigned comment added by TFiPW (talk • contribs) 12:13, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sequel
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Ligulem

message: I moved this page from Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Adrian Buehlmann to Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Ligulem, because in the meantime I have changed my login-name. See Angela's move of my userpage as evidence. She did the username change per my request. --Ligulem 18:25, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:The Faculty

message: I've removed part of the Trivia section. As per WP:TRIVIA, trivia sections are discouraged under wikipedia. I've let most of it stand, but some of it I took down because it wasn't really trivia, but really original research. We shouldn't say the movie is an homage to The Breakfast Club or The Thing without giving reliable secondary sources saying it was intended as such. Without sources, it's possibly coincidence, which shouldn't be mentioned in wikipedia. If there are sources, feel free to add it back, although it would fit better in the main body of the article (since separate trivia sections are discouraged). Thanks! Dayewalker (talk) 15:48, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia section 

message: The Venus and Usher bits that are oddly in the DVD release section. Do we need them at all? And if we do, they need to be moved...somewhere. Lots42 (talk) 09:01, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Venus and Usher 

message: Could the Faculty be considered a body horror flick, or at least subgenre? It has many elements of body horror, like alien parasites and there are many similarities and even influences from John Carpenter's The Thing, perhaps the most well-known body horror film! Celestial Patala (talk) 00:06, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: There's more to body horror than alien parasites.  However, we would need reliable sources to label a film as fitting into a questionable genre. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:49, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Body horror?
Talk:Simple extension

message: The discussion of the other definition of "primitive element" (for finite fields) is weak. The two usages are somewhat different, it is true, but there does not need to be so many words spent on it. Or something. 84.226.161.197 (talk) 23:39, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weak 

message: This article would be a really good place to put a careful discussion of the difference between a simple algebraic and a simple transcendental extension. I think there might be something roughly like that in field extension, but it would be much cleaner to put it here. The article field extension is probably a bit too long, too many facts squeezed in. Dmharvey 18:29, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I will see what I can do. MathMartin 11:30, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

text: I tried to expand and clarify the article on the points you have mentioned, but I am not completely satisfied with the result. MathMartin 14:54, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Careful Discussion 

message: The articles Simple extension and primitive element theorem have much in common and neither is particularly long -- could they be unified?  Richard Pinch (talk) 06:55, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unification 

message: This section is incredibly confusing.  Every paragraph flips back and forth between the two definitions of primitive element and generator, (#1) where successive powers of which yield a field's multiplicative group, and (#2) the element that creates the field extension L. 
 
"Thus the general definition requires that every element of the field may be expressed as a polynomial in the generator,"
How does the general definition require that?  Also, "polynomial in the generator" is confusing, it should read more like "a polynomial who's indeterminate is θ.
Finally it's not clear what the equation L=K(θ) means.  K is a field, not a function.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.60.43.48 (talk) 08:13, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, and I have rewritten it. D.Lazard (talk) 11:26, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition
Talk:Windy Gap Trail (Angeles National Forest)

message: Currently Windy Gap has a number of downed trees across the trail however they are being removed as time permits. Two of the Sutter Walls have been damaged which is somewhat surprising since they usually hold up to tremendous back-fill pressure however they will also be fixed. Once the trail is in fully restored condition I'll post an update to this page to note the fact that the trail is clear end to end. Damotclese (talk) 16:39, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The dead trees across the trail have been removed, there are no obstructions currently remaining as of today. Four of the Sutter Walls are damaged due to the anchors that the contractor used having not been strong enough to hold up under loading however repairs are underway. Damotclese (talk) 16:39, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maintenance Under Way 

message: There are 12 Sutter Walls located along the section of Windy Gap which leads from South Mount Hawkins Road up to the Saddle, 4 of which are damaged due to the anchors that the paid contractors used pulling out of the hillside and failing. 
The Trailbuilders volunteers have extracted some of the damaged wall segments which have caused obstructions along the trail, and will be replacing them with heavier anchors.
01/June/2013 the section of the trail leading from the Deer Flat Road up to South Mount Hawkins Road is expected to get repaired, major erosion along the trail (which has forced the trail to be moved three feet to the side) should be getting repaired, re-establishing the original trail. Damotclese (talk) 16:23, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current Repairs 

message: Note to self: Some additional information about what to expect at the Saddle might be useful, more so since a rest bench was carved at the Saddle, suitable to sit on or even to sleep on. 
An additional sign is needed at the start of the trail segment that goes to Little Jimmy Trail Camp, complete with the PCT logo which is missing from the East sign that indicates the direction of Little Jimmy. The sign is not yet on the inventory of replacement signs for damaged and missing signs. Damotclese (talk) 16:36, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Saddle Rest Bench
Talk:Nordlandshest/Lyngshest

message: Isn't it supposed to be "Nordlandshest"? "Nordlandshester" is the plural of ":no:nordlandshest". - Soulkeeper 18:33, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name of article

message: heyhey, just wanted to say I think that picture of the lyngshest is pretty bad, and say I do have some better ones of my own one; but I don't know how to upoad them; so i'd be happy if anyone would want to... if so reply here or contact me on blue_black_panther@hotmail.com =] Nizingur 07:36, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You may find the information you are looking for here: Wikipedia:Uploading images. Labongo 12:24, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures 

message: Just a little aside here as I'm carrying out a huge edit: in addition to whatever I cut from the original article text because I had the same thing sourced added in, I also cut the part with ...descendant of the Asiatic Wild Horse and the Tarpan.... AFAIAW, no contemporary horse has been proven to descend from either of these. --Pitke (talk) 12:21, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, if it can't be sourced, the best we can do is say "alleged by breed promoters."  Sometimes I do that if I anticipate it will be an issue.  (Just like I put the stuff about cross-breeding between Andalusians and Barbs being proven by DNA because both argue about how "pure" their breeds are... heh, heh...). Montanabw(talk) 07:37, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tarpans and Przewalskis