Talk:Bahmani Sultanate

message: The following statement may or may not be true, but it must be documented:
"The Bahmanis were responsible for large scale massacres and slaughter of south Indian Hindu population and destruction of temples, often overshadowing the atrocities conducted by Turks and Mughals in north India."
Massacres, slaughter and destruction of temples suggest POV issues in the absence of documentation. It is not enough to say "everyone knows this".  Give a citation.
:Probably nothing of this sort happened. Student's britannica writes that Bahmani sultans showed relegious tolerance and non-interference to Hindus.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.96.226.88 (talk) 07:30, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: True, the Bahmani sultans renamed their two capitals "Ahsanabad" and "Muhammadabad", but shouldn't they be called by their former and later names in the article, i.e. Gulbarga and Bidar? So that more people know where they are and that they still exist?
Contemporary sources like the Riyaz ul-insha' (which I have read) usually mention both names, e.g "Muhammadabad Bidar". So probably most people called their city Bidar anyway. Curryfranke (talk) 12:03, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Capital names

message: Traces of Shi'ism in south India are very few before 1500. Iran became a Shi'i country in 1501, and immigrants from Iran before 1500 were Sunnis of the Shafi'i mazhab. Shi'as did exist as a small minority in Qom and Mashhad, and among the Turkish tribes of Azerbaijan, but they were not specially attracted to India. The Grand Vizier Mahmud Gawan was a staunch Sunni and retained close relations with the great poet and Naqshbandi pir Jami, who was a staunch Sunni by profession. Curryfranke (talk) 12:13, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think we should take you seriously.--Mydust (talk) 20:13, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Shi'a

message: Qasim Barid I , this article says that Qasim Barid I (r.1489-1504) was a prime-minister of the Bahmani sultanate and the founder of the Bidar Sultanate, -- Raghith 08:50, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Qasim_Barid_I 

message: *Mohammed Shah II 1378–1397 the internal link wrong. it goes to the Turkeyhistory. But this article is about Indian history.--தகவலுழவன் (talk) 02:41, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mohammed Shah II 

message: I check pages listed in :Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of :Bahmani Sultanate's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "m":
From Ahmadnagar Sultanate: Majumdar, R.C. (ed.) (2007). The Mughul Empire, Mumbai: Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan, , pp.415–45
From Ala-ud-Din Bahman Shah: Majumdar, R.C. (ed.) (2006). The Delhi Sultanate, Mumbai:Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan, p.248
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 11:43, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphaned references in [[:Bahmani Sultanate]] 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Bahmani Sultanate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061019004703/http://www.iranica.com/newsite/home/index.isc to http://www.iranica.com/newsite/home/index.isc
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:20, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bahmani Sultanate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070223071144/http://orbat.com/site/cimh/kings_master/kings/ibrahimII_adil_shahi/5_provinces.html to http://orbat.com/site/cimh/kings_master/kings/ibrahimII_adil_shahi/5_provinces.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:58, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: , now blocked for socking, has contributed this line:
The relevant found in the Introductory chapter of the thesis says:
A fine example of WP:NPOV editing? -- Kautilya3 (talk) 12:13, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fanatics? 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:53, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: There's a separate History of the Bahmani Sultanate page which is much smaller than the history section here. I therefore support the September proposal to merge that article into the relevant section. Klbrain (talk) 08:42, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Support merge: per nom. Sutyarashi (talk) 11:57, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Support: No reason to have a spin off page when it is not as fledged out as the main article itself in its main topic. Noorullah (talk) 00:28, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  Klbrain (talk) 22:46, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal