Talk:Battersea Power Station

message: Battersea Power Station has been confirmed as the name of the new area from the redevelopment of the old power station. Therefore, a new article is needed on the area. Simply south  ...... time, deparment skies for just 9 years 20:06, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: If Battersea Power Station, London / Battersea Power Station (housing) etc has significant coverage in multiple, independent, reliable sources, feel free to start an article. If it has trivial coverage and / or coverage in a small number of sources, append it to this article. If it has no coverage in reliable sources (unlikely, I feel), no change. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:44, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  The area 

message: The second paragraph of the article begins
: The station is the fourth largest brick building in Europe
but the source cited is not at all reliable.  It is a blog post at http://www.architectureanddesign.com.au/features/list/largest-brick-buildings-around-the-world-infograph , which does not discuss the topic at all.  Instead, it announces an infographic published by another source, brickhunter.com, which appears to have been a commercial brick-procurement service, and which is now defunct.  It provides an illegible, reduced-size version of the infographic.  (A complete version is available from http://visual.ly/largest-brick-buildings-world .)  
The original source was http://www.brickhunter.com/blog/largest-brick-buildings-in-the-world.html would surely not have been considered reliable even if it was still online.  
The infographic is described as follows:
: Using a combination of Google Earth and an area calculator, Brick Hunter has painstakingly measured the ground size of the largest buildings around the world
which does not instil confidence: What if they measured wrong?  What if they forgot about some brick buildings?
http://www.catholic.org/travel/story.php?id=41790 , a source at least as reliable as the one cited, claims that the largest brick building in the world is the Cathédrale Ste-Cécile in Albi; this structure is not in the infographic's top ten.  
I suggest we remove this extremely questionable claim from the article.  —Mark Dominus (talk) 15:02, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I noticed this a few months back and tried to find a reliable source. What I found were several contradictory sources of questionable reliability. In addition to the problems you note, I don't think ground footprint is a reasonable measure of brick building size. They obviously used this measure just because it was convenient. I think we could safely say Battersea is "one of the largest" brick buildings in Europe. I could go along with either saying that or simply removing this claim. Kendall-K1 (talk) 15:27, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Looking through Google Books this morning I found many claims that Battersea was variously the largest brick building in Britain, in Western Europe, in Europe, and in the world.  I did not find any discussion of what this would mean exactly (By square footage? By number of bricks?)  nor anything I would consider really reliable, such as a specific comparison of Battersea with Malbork Castle, the Cathédrale Ste-Cécile, etc.  I am going to change the wording to “one of the largest brick buildings in the world”, which seems well-supported.  It is probably true, and even if not, it can be well-cited.  —Mark Dominus (talk) 14:38, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fourth-largest brick building in Europe 

message: Is there a reason why this article's lead section now reads like a development company's new project pamphlet? This article, I note, passed as a good article ten years ago and sadly, it has been left to rot. I've not bothered with the rest of the article, but I would lay money on it that it is just as bad. CassiantoTalk 18:17, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Nothing heard, so I've been bold and rewritten it. CassiantoTalk 13:23, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead section  

message: Bttersea Power Station has been a landmark of south west London. It was a power station up until 1983 when the last part of it was decommissioned. Whilst it has sat around derelict for decades, it wasn't until the early 21st century with the listed status and the development by a consortium of different companies that it has become its own neighbourhood as a mixed residential, commercial and entertainment complex. Now that the area has even gained its own tube station and the name not only refers to the power station but the surrounding buildings as well, it feels like this would be the right time to discuss some form of a split for the page. Difficultly north (talk) The artist formerly known as Simply south 15:13, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Don’t think it is really necessary, the article appears fine as it is. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 16:57, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

text: Maybe in future - the article could do with having its recent history substantially expanded! Turini2 (talk) 10:25, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Time for a split?