lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Bulk and Skull

message: This spelling apprears throughout Wikipedia. It's wrong. The on-screen verified spelling of the name is Farcus Bulkmier. As seen in PRT episode #24.
Perhaps someone would like to correct it.
SnoopsWarner (talk) 16:43, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling 

message: I've never seen an episode where Bulk seems particularly interested in Trini. However, there is an episode in season two (cannot remember the name) where Bulk is attracted to Aisha, the second yellow ranger. Perhaps that was confusion by the editor?
--69.203.129.172 (talk) 04:35, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Season 1, Episode 12, final scene.  Skull turns up to take Kimberley on their date, and Bulk suggests to Trini that they make it a double date.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.22.37.88 (talk) 13:39, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bulk appeared to wanting to win Trini's affection?  

message: okay this is getting a bit ridiculous. I can somehow understand adding Laurel & Hardy, but Timon & Pumbaa? Cheech & Chong? Kenan & Kel? isnt there a rule what is relevant for such a section? IchiGhost (talk) 16:32, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  See also section 

message: I think that Bulk has done enough independent of Skull. Maybe the article should be split into a page for Bulk and a page for Skull. I think that would be a good way to solve the problem. Even though they mostly work together, it would make since to have this seperate.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.138.51.143 (talk) 17:40, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split article? 

message: These sources are all pretty weak. They're mostly about Power Rangers itself. 2605:B40:1303:900:A842:6D2D:8AA1:2985 (talk) 02:28, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable?
Talk:Sangaku

message: to putting sangaku in "temples and shrines". If you follow the Wikipedia links given for "temple" and "shrine" you would just be mystified, because the original Japanese distinction (i.e. referring to o-tera = Buddhist religious edifice and jinja = Shinto religious edifice) is completely lost on anyone who doesn't happen to know the convention.
Imaginatorium (talk) 17:29, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: There was a reference 

message: I restored a number of links which were deleted.  I disagree or simply don't understand the reasoning which informed the edit.  Perhaps this can be clarified with a fuller explanation than was possible in the narrow context of an edit summary?--Tenmei (talk) 04:36, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: External links

message: Should "Sangaku", appearing as a word in the text of the article, be capitalized? Our article is currently inconsistent on this point. My assumption would be that as an ordinary Japanese word/phrase, borrowed into English, it should be lowercase, but perhaps someone else here knows better than I what conventions apply for Japanese capitalization. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:56, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd just switch it to lowercase. A web search seems to mostly show lowercase in writing in English, and I can't see any special reason to capitalize it. –jacobolus (t) 19:04, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

text: Agreed with jacobolus. See also MOS:GAMECAPS: things from folk culture, which are rather the opposite of trademarks, should not be capitalized. And MOS:DOCTCAPS: don't capitalize things simply because they have something to do with religion.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  10:05, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

text: Per previous - lowercase. Cinderella157 (talk) 03:42, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalization
Talk:Kaguya

message: There's a company out there that wants to build a ship named after Princess Kaguya. The idea is to put together a floating city of some 450,000 tons (well, 250,000 tonnes minimum), but with the recession being as is, I'm not sure that company can get that idea off the ground. I'd suggest that company try hooking up with Royal Caribbean and maybe fooling around with the Oasis of the Seas class to get such a concept to work. (I figure Oasis is off-the-shelf, so planning and engineering it wouldn't be quite so hard.) 204.52.215.107 (talk) 00:25, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

message: It should be obvious now that this Kaguya from Naruto is based off of Kaguyahime. No adding new ones anymore?
-G-Zulu (talk) 20:36, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  One more Kaguya from -Naruto-
Talk:Tongzhi (term)

message: Empress_Dowager_Cixi#Behind_the_Curtains statest that Tongzhi means "collective rule". Meanings are fluid, but the meaning given here is subtly but importantly different. Which is correct? Pbhj (talk) 21:27, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Sorry for the more than a decade delay, , and don't know if yo're still interested, but I just saw this. Tongzhi#1 and Tongzhu#2 are homonyms, different words; "tong" does mean "the same," or "shared," but zhi is a different character, one means "rule" and the other means "will." ch (talk) 22:12, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Meaning of Tongzhi

message: Neither of the supportive references for the LGBT meaning link to text that can verify the accuracy of what is said. Mish (talk) 00:07, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  LGBT refs
Talk:IBM 3705 Communications Controller

message: Why does this article have that category? tooold 03:15, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: category: History of computing hardware

message: Where is that supposed to go to? It's currently aimed at a disambiguation. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 04:05, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: MST components

message: The comments about the Amdahl 4705 seem like they should all go to the Related machines section, or else it could have its own article. Gah4 (talk) 22:58, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  4705
Talk:Cauchy–Hadamard theorem

message: Could we get a reference for the multivariable version of the theorem? 218.208.8.112 (talk) 02:50, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I added a proof 121.121.60.56 (talk) 04:48, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The proof does not include the cases when R=0 or R=+infinity. 160.216.151.232 (talk) 17:36, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Multivariable version reference?

message: The section Theorem for several complex variables contains this passage:
"Let \alpha be a multi-index (a n-tuple of integers) with |\alpha|=\alpha_1+\cdots+\alpha_n, then f(x) converges with radius of convergence \rho (which is also a multi-index) if and only if"
\limsup_{|\alpha|\to\infty} \sqrt[|\alpha|]{|c_\alpha|\rho^\alpha}=1
to the multidimensional power series
\sum_{\alpha\geq0}c_\alpha(z-a)^\alpha := \sum_{\alpha_1\geq0,\ldots,\alpha_n\geq0}c_{\alpha_1,\ldots,\alpha_n}(z_1-a_1)^{\alpha_1}\cdots(z_n-a_n)^{\alpha_n}"
I can try to guess what 𝝆𝛼 might be.
But it is much, much, much better if the article explained exactly what 𝝆𝛼 means, where both 𝝆 and 𝛼 are multi-indexes.
I hope someone knowledgeable about this subject can insert a definition.
:I have added a definition of both. I removed the reference to "multi-index" and replaced it with the concept of a vector, which I hope is more precise. I changed the notation from |\alpha| to ||\alpha|| to avoid the confusion with |c_a| which mean different things as I believe c_a is not a vector. I found this notation used in Fuks Theory of Analytic Functions of Several Complex Variables which you can find in the openlibrary pp. 48. It is an old text, so I hope the notation is not out of date. I am not 100% sure that \alpha is a vector of natural numbers. Dom walden (talk) 08:05, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is a multi-index raised to a multi-index power?
Talk:Rising Sun, Maryland

message: Rising Sun definitely has the KKK, though it seems to be poorly documented on the internet, but it is in old newspapers if you check Google news, and it is always in the local radio news in Maryland. Sometimes you have to just take it from the locals. The internet does not have the answer for everything.--69.250.142.163 03:20, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Cramér's decomposition theorem

message: This article should be split in two, since it discusses two completely different theorems. Boris Tsirelson (talk) 12:50, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: At present this article is little more than a disambiguation page.  What names would you give to the two theorems?  I just found an article (in French) where the first theorem (on the sum of two independent random variables) is called "[le] théorème de Lévy-Cramer" (H. ROUANET, B. LECLERC Le rôle de la distribution normale en statistique Mathématiques et sciences humaines, vol. 32 (1970), p. 57-74. http://www.numdam.org/item?id=MSH_1970__32__57_0 )  Perhaps we can call this theorem the Lévy–Cramér theorem to disambiguate from Cramér's other theorem (on large deviations), which also seems to go by the name "Cramér's theorem"? Deepmath (talk) 08:00, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I agree. Another ref: Section 8.8 "The Lévy-Cramér theorem" in book: David Pollard, "A user's guide to measure theoretic probability", Cambridge Univ. Press 2002. Boris Tsirelson (talk) 08:57, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately, there seems to be yet another theorem that goes by the name of Lévy–Cramér: it has to do with the convergence of the characteristic functions of a sequence of probability distributions.  I'm getting lost again...  But there is a nice proof in the book you mentioned. Deepmath (talk) 09:11, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Anyway it is fortunate, not unfortunate :) Boris Tsirelson (talk) 09:59, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Two theorems
Talk:Projection keyboard

message: I have thought of this considerably as a deaf writer that needs a better communication system. (I talk just don't hear.) However I was thinking more along the lines of speech recognition as a tool for pocket sized help. (you talk I read)seems more considerate of everyones needs. I never thought of the keypad idea, however I would probably use one if it became available and was portable.Roundtuit (talk) 15:17, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  No subject 

message: • Personal digital assistants
• Cellular telephones
• Space saving computers
• Tablet PCs
• Laptops
• Industrial environments
• Sterile and medical environments
• Test Equipment 
• Transport (Air, Rail, Automotive)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tneaswaran (talk • contribs) 12:41, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  VKB Environments: 

message: I don't think the projected image is actually a hologram. Projected holograms, AFAIK, are a very recent invention (last couple of years), and even then there's a bit of a trick to it. I'm thinking of the horribly expensive ones used famously in the stage shows of some singer or other.
Isn't the beamed image just a simple flat projection? The correct word would be something like "image" or "projection" over "hologram". Tho I haven't seen one of these in person so I can't say conclusively.
188.29.83.186 (talk) 03:27, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hologram 

message: It kind of does the same thing but the medium is glass. 95.178.152.20 (talk) 10:04, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Glass keyboard ?
Talk:Factorion

message: Is such a large table useful for the article? or should we consider drastically reducing the size of it, and only have entries for specific bases? Rody1990 (talk) 21:01, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Went ahead and reduced the table, I don't see the point of so many examplesRody1990 (talk) 00:35, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Factorion Table 

message: They seem to have the same definition Serouj2000 (talk) 18:48, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Difference between this and strong numbers?
Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/October 22, 2007

message: Could I rephrase the summary?
Enzyme kinetics is the study of the rates of chemical reactions that are catalysed by enzymes. Enzymes are molecules that manipulate other molecules — the enzymes' substrates. These target molecules bind to an enzyme's active site and are transformed into products in a series of steps known as the enzymatic mechanism. The study of an enzyme's kinetics provides insights into this catalytic mechanism, as well as the role of the enzyme in metabolism, how its activity is controlled in the cell and how drugs and poisons may inhibit its activity. Knowledge of the enzyme's structure is helpful in interpreting the kinetic data.
Thanks Tim Vickers 03:29, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Raul654 03:31, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Kilik Pass

message: A question:
The page says the following:
"The Mintaka pass was the main one used in ancient times until the fairly recent advance of glacier ice has forced people in recent times to use the so-called "New Mustagh Pass" (5,800 m or 19,029 ft), about 16 km further west;"
Should that not be the "Mustagh pass" rather than the Mintaka Pass? The Mustagh pass was closed to any kind of reagular travel when Younghusband cross it in 1877 and has been crossed only handful of times since then. The New Mustagh Pass is a bit to the west of the Mustagh pass.
My impression is that the Mintaka and Kilik passes remain usable, except that the Chinese do not permit them to be used as border crossings.
I have no expertise on this subject. I am merely saying that the page seems to be inconsistent with my half-baked knowledge of the status.
71.241.153.83 03:31, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
File talk:2002 bel air.jpg

message: This image is not needed, we have numerous free images of different models, we dont have to include non-free images. βcommand 03:38, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: All the free images are of the older models. The article specifically mentions the return of the model in the form of 2002 concept car and no free image of the concept car is possible. This irreplaceable publicity image released by GM is rightfully used to illustrate the article and its rationale justifies the usage explaining the conforming to policy. Whoever ever tags the image with a valid rationale should always explain why the rationale is invalid. Unexplained tags are to be removed. --Irpen 04:45, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

text: Ok, please read the tag before removing it, I did not tag it for the rationale. I tagged it as replaceable. βcommand 12:35, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Praecipe

message: "A praecipe is a legal term in the U.S. that either (A) commands..."  I can understand a person or a court commanding something, but a legal term?  That makes no sense at all.
"...a defendant to do appear..." -- as opposed to "appear" without the "do"?
"...and show cause why an act or thing should not be done; or (B) requests the clerk of court to issue a writ and to specify its contents."
The clerk was to "specify" the contents of the writ he just wrote?  Who decided?  Specify how?
"The word preacipe [sic] is base Latin."  What's "base Latin"?
"The word survived long after the Roman Empire..."  Most impressive (I like the aqueducts), but if it still survives, why "survived"?
"...and found its way into England, where it survived in the English law."  Sounds like a globe-trotting goldfish.
"The writ was often issued to amend or change a subsequent order..."  Often?  Several times weren't enough "to amend or change" an order which hadn't yet been issued?
"...or to correct an error that may have been missed earlier."  So it's an error-correction sort of writ?
"Its appearance in American law is not surprising..."  Just as I suspected.
"...as many of the English customs and traditions were passed on."  I'm not surprised.
"Today its function has barely changed..."  Now that's a shocker!  Is it a noun or a verb?
"...since those days of Roman times."  Please don't tell me Rome is gone.  I couldn't bear the shock.
 -- with a wink and a tip of the hat to the original author. D021317c 03:40, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ratiocination
Talk:Non-aligned Coalition

message: The translation we're using on Wikipedia of the name of this party (obunden samling –> Non-aligned rally) is absolutely terrible.  Translating "samling" to "rally" in this context is extremely inaccurate.   A much better translation would be "Non-Allied Coalition", as in the case of the Swedish Moderata samlingspartiet (Moderate Coalition Party).  —Vikingviolinist (talk) 00:28, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of party in english
Talk:USS Commodore Barney

message: The picture is of the Commodore Perry, not the Commodore Perry. A correctly identified picture can be found at USMHI in the MOLLUS-Mass collection. http://cdm16635.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/compoundobject/collection/p16635coll12/id/9810/show/9777/rec/2 Apparently someone trusts DANS and NARA captions! The Barney didn't have two pilothouses.
76.182.77.91 (talk) 13:27, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed. howcheng  {chat} 16:53, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The picture is wrong.
Talk:Quantitative proteomics

message: Quantitative mass spectrometry in proteomics: a critical review
Quantitative mass spectrometry in proteomics: critical review update from 2007 to the present
Mass spectrometry-based label-free quantitative proteomics
Innovations: Functional and quantitative proteomics using SILAC
A review on mass spectrometry-based quantitative proteomics: targeted and data independent acquisition
Quantitative proteomics: challenges and opportunities in basic and applied research
Quantitative proteomics of model organisms
Quantitative proteomics in lung cancer
Social network architecture of human immune cells unveiled by quantitative proteomics
OmarKana (talk)
You will need to make sure that your article integrates with label-free quantification (),also: , ;  --Kkmurray (talk) 20:34, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Bibliography for edits (Incomplete)
Talk:Charlotte Coyle

message: Sure there isn't much listed, but from what has been written about her she's no less worthy of a page than any of the other plus-size models on here.  Not to mention she's listed in the plus-sized models main article. Johnbiggs 04:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Asserted Importance 
Talk:Powered lift

message: I just moved lots of stuff from Rotorcraft after much discussion. Apologies if it's a bit rough and ready, hope others of you can take it from here. -- Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 14:39, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved stuff in

message: Is not borne out by the link which is to an agenda item for discussion. Hence I've tagged it as dubious. GraemeLeggett (talk) 14:10, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Page 2, Para 1.2, lines 2-3 was where I copy-pasted it from. The real difficulty is that it feels inconsistent with the rest of the document. I couldn't find any direct contradiction (not that I looked very hard) but there seems to be an underlying assumption that powered lifts are distinct from rotorcraft (whereas the quotation implies that rotorcraft are a subset of powered lifts). The important thing is that, even in spite of this, the powered lift category is pretty inclusive. If you can find a better quote that makes this point in a less unfortunate way, go to it. -- Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 16:49, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The main issue is that the document is not from the ICAO as such but a piece put forward by the US to the ICAO arguing for changes to the ICAO classification system, rather han piecemeal decisions by indvidual states. As such it is a restatement of the FAA position. GraemeLeggett (talk) 18:26, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There, I'll never take Born2flie's references seriously again . -- Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 20:49, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  ICAO position on powered lift 

message: Hi, I have started a discussion at Talk:VTOL#Classification of VTOL aircraft — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 12:21, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Classification of VTOL aircraft 

message: Did some editing to make the discussion more widely understood. Two sections are missing. 
First, a discussion of history.  When were such aircraft developed?  Which type developed first?  Where are they used and by whom? Etc.  
Second, a discussion of the pros and cons are such aircraft.  Why are they not widely used?  Why are they used at all?  How do they compare with helicopters and fixed-wing aircraft?  Are they more dangerous?  Do Ospreys crash more than "regular" aircraft?
In general, this article defines this type of aircraft and its sub-types.  To be more encyclopedic it needs to discuss how powered lift aircraft fit -- or not -- into the air industry more broadly.  --Iloilo Wanderer (talk) 11:00, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two missing sections: history and characteristics or pros and cons
Talk:Addendum

message: Actually, graduate school applications in general. We should have a short note about how people write addenda when they apply to graduate and / or professional school. 72.192.141.101 04:08, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Law Schools 

message: There is an interesting and unresolved (im my opinion) discussion about the differences between annex and appendix, I would be happy if someone can en-light about the differences and specify a reliable source. From what I read so far, there seems to be conflicting definitions. Weiss gal (talk) 09:53, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Annex Vs Appendix 

message: "...is an addition required to be made to a document by its reader..."
By its writer, surely? An addendum to a book is not dictated by its readers, but something added by an author or publisher usually after the main work has been typeset/arranged and is considered too difficult to change, or similarly for a reprint etc.
188.222.184.114 (talk) 03:22, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Huh? 

message: The usage and primary topic of  is under discussion, see talk:Vermiform appendix -- 70.51.203.69 (talk) 05:44, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: "Appendix"

message: To improve readability I suggest to replace "subsequent to" with "after". If I do it by myself, my edit will be reverted by WP:BKFIP. 85.193.215.210 (talk) 01:41, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "subsequent to" -> "after"