lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:White House Office of Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships

message: Why are David Kuo & "Tempting_Faith:_An_Inside_Story_of_Political_Seduction" not listed?
hopiakuta ;  { [[ %7e%7e%7e%7e ]] } ; ]] 00:54, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As someone who wrote a legal memo on the subject you would be uniquely positioned to improve it.  Be bold, edit away.  Just be careful to cite your sources.  Unlike many editors here you would likely have extensive sources to cite so your help would be greatly appreciated.  aremisasling (talk) 19:38, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: sign! [[ %7e%7e%7e%7e ]]

message: I attempted to clean this section up a bit.  I removed mention of a comment by a blogger as the blogger, herself, provided no references or proof that she had actually called Towey.  The structure was awful and did appear to be original research.  I tweaked some bits that were definitely not NPOV and fleshed out the point on Obama to cover his whole stance on the issue without, I hope, crossing the line into an add for Obama.  The old wording, on the other hand, seemed more like an indictment.  I also added reference to one comment regarding pagans that got a lot of attention at the time at least in the pagan community.  
The article still has a little bit of the bad flavor of original research and really doesn't have any counter-arguments at all (big possible NPOV?), but at least the remaining comments are cited and the NPOV wording has largely been removed.  Anyway, it's better now, though far from perfect.  aremisasling (talk) 19:37, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the entire reference to Obama's standpoint on the issue. A presidential candidate's opinion does not belong in this article, unless there was some referenced controversy over his opinion that could be included as another controversy. The statement on his opinion doesn't add anything factual to the issue and carries bias. Wingman1331 (talk) 21:03, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversy section

message: This article indicates that the office no longer exists.  As far as I know, the new administration hasn't done anything to abolish it at this time.  It would take an executive order, as it was created by one.  --Son (talk) 23:35, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: New administration
Talk:Zeke (band)

message: How do you say this word? Zek? Zey key? Zek key? Would help out.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.1.35.136 (talk) 14:33, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: "Zeek", as in the lyric "Ride with Zeke, the future's uncertain & bleak". --Tim010987 (talk) 21:40, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciation?

message: *Move This is non-controversial as the current name violates WP:TM. TJ Spyke 00:02, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: But it won't allow a page move, saying a page titled "Zeke (band)" already exists, not noticing the differences in capitalization. I'll manually move it. --Tim010987 (talk) 02:30, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Fuck. Can't even do it manually cause of the redirect. --Tim010987 (talk) 02:33, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:Guy Fisher

message: part of what council???  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.49.144.217 (talk) 14:56, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Chfbffhfv 2601:4A:401:F1D0:EC1B:171A:775C:4747 (talk) 02:02, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Snitch
Talk:Shiva hypothesis

message: I would suggest, for clarity's sake, improving "gravitational disturbances caused by the Earth crossing the plane of the Milky Way" by substituting "Solar System" in place of Earth. Seems to me that could cause confusion.
KyurioZT 03:22, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: By informal convention, yes, but there is no formal definition of theory, except it should be statements/models that are testable and verifiable/falsifiable. By some informal convention "hypotheses" refer to such statements/models that are formulated in order to explain something otherwise unexplicable, while theories are former hypotheses that have been tested and not yet failed. Rursus dixit. (mbork3!) 17:10, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Shiva Hypothesis

message: I found three ADSABS links regarding this weak Shiva Hypothesis – which is very few indeed – it is notable just by the skin of its teeth. If the interest on this hypothesis is not increasing very much in the future, I would estimate it will lose its notability. Rursus dixit. (mbork3!) 17:10, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Is this notable?

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved   (t · c) buidhe 05:29, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Shiva Hypothesis →  – Per WP:NCCAPS and MOS:CAPS, particularly MOS:SCIMATH. Lithopsian (talk) 18:01, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 26 January 2021
Talk:CFLAGS

message: Editors of this article, please note that the original 'CFLAGS' article was deleted due to being too GNU-/Gentoo-specific, in addition to reading like a manual and being no use to anyone other than GCC tweakers. While the start of this page is much better than the one before, please try to keep in mind not to turn this page into a manual or make it too specific to the GNU toolchain. Please don't take this as a threat or anything of the sort, I'm just trying to keep people from doing unappreciated work. -- intgr 15:43, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Friendly warning :)
Talk:Sir George Monoux College

message: This is an encyclopedia article, not a gossip sheet. Please only include material with references, or links to Wikipedia articles (which presumably have their own references). ubiquity (talk) 21:29, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gossip
Talk:Nova (radio network)

message: Nova is also a TV show on PBS in the 'states. Can someone make a referance to this? Superstarwarsfan 15:45, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: TV

message: Hello,
In approximately 24 hours I will begin a substantial set of edits to the Nova and DMG related articles on Wikipedia to remove sections that:
# Contain changing schedule information.
# Remove unreferenced information if a reference cannot be found.
# Remove sections that read as advertisements.
I will also be doing the following:
# Introduce a common format across the Nova FM Stations articles.
# Write up new sections on the stations permanent programming.
# Provide external sources for unreferenced content.
# Requesting DMG Radio's assistance through staff at Nova 106.9 in Brisbane, in finding external sources for content.
If you have any concerns about this, please let me know either here, or on my talk page, or both. Pursey 15:33, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Substantial Changes and Content Removal 

message: If your wanting to make a Nova TV page, then create a new page on Wiki or follow on with the current one if one already exists.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.167.200.153 (talk) 14:09, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is Nova radio network not TV
Talk:Jimmie Dodd

message: I'm glad he has a page. He was a very good songwriter and seemed like a super person. Perhaps I will add a few things.  8OYscLu9 (talk) 02:40, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Old comments

message: He was playing a backstage hand offering to carry a trunk or suitcase. Maine49 (talk) 21:11, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  I think I just saw Jimmie Dodd in an uncredited role in the 1942 film "Yankee Doodle Dandy".
Talk:Mohammed Odeh

message: Attn WikiProject Terrorism: Shouldn't this stub-article be part of WikiProject Terrorism?robertjohnsonrj 15:49, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is now. Terraxos (talk) 23:30, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ruane, Cunniff & Goldfarb

message: The title should be "Ruane, Cunniff & Goldfarb" (no comma after Cunniff; ambersand instead of "and").  Can we retitle it and redirect this article to the newly titled one?--68.199.33.181 15:55, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Pburka (talk) 18:58, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Title
Talk:List of Captain Tsubasa characters

message: Some thirty pages of detail about this franchise are up for deletion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Hafaz Refrisa Maulana. Rich Farmbrough, 19:36, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: User pages about Captain Tsubasa at MfD
Talk:Royal Automobile Club of Queensland

message: For some reason, the title of this article was "Royal Automobile Club of Queensland Limited" from its creation. I have now removed the "Limited" from this title. - Mark 16:04, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

message: I'm not convinced these edits  are suitable. Ignoring the fact that they were added, removed and re-added by two WP:ORGNAME users, I believe this falls under the category of WP:NOTNEWS. --Drm310 (talk) 15:59, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  8 July 2015 edits 

message: It appears that RACQ staffers have been editing the page (removing local information) in the belief that Wiki is an authorised company page. [(4,858 bytes) (-1,213)‎ . . (remove unauthorised information from company page as authorised communications staff member)] [04:40, 9 July 2015‎ RACQ Official (talk | contribs)‎ . . (4,761 bytes) (-8)‎ . . (undo | thank)]  I am not sure that they are unbiased.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Evmuseum (talk • contribs)  
:And the edits claiming to be from an "authorised communications staff member" of RACQ and a "RACQ Official" account were reverted with notice to the former (the latter was blocked from editing) that RACQ doesn't own this page.  If the information is removed, it will not be for that reason (though its long-term relevance to an encyclopaedic article on RACQ is questionable, as mentioned in the section above, so it could be removed for that reason). General Ization Talk    23:41, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  9th July edits
Talk:Greengairs Landfill

message: --Alex 16:08, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for those words of wisdom, beever, I was around Penistone the other day. Amusing name.Alex 11:44, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

message: The link to the DTI is useless because the department has been renamed. Could someone update this, if the info is still there? --Allanlewis (talk) 11:47, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to DTI
Talk:Bahawalpur (princely state)

message: I just got 4 stamps commemorating the 75th anniversary of the Universal Postal Union. If anyone knows the copyright status of its postage stamps, please advise before I can upload the image to Wikimedia Commons. Otherwise, I will upload it here as fair use stamp image only.--Jusjih 16:14, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright status of its postage stamps

message: Change Skr to Punjabi 119.152.146.41 (talk) 11:54, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:12, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

text: Yes, I do agree. Saraiki was not even a term nor even a separate language at the time of existance of the State of Bahawalpur. The dialect of Punjabi spoken in Bahawalpur at that time was called "Riyasati Punjabi" and commonly just "Punjabi" amongst the people. It is important to keep this article historically correct, as it is important in regard to the Punjab and Pakistan. BingChillingChina (talk) 11:25, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 27 January 2023
Talk:Fort Collins Municipal Railway

message: Article claims "Fort Collins was the smallest city in the United States to operate streetcars" and "had the lowest fares of any public transport system in the nation". These claims are uncited and hard to believe. Although I suppose it is possible that Fort Collins was the smallest, streetcar systems in small towns were very common before WWII. As for the lowest-fares claim, I doubt that is verifiable at all, even if true.Jdmalouff 05:55, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Really?
Talk:Charles F. Van Loan

message: Please stop this absurd tagging. The article states two facts that clearly establish notability. (See WP:PROF.) Chairing the mathematics department at a major university is one; being the author of one of the preeminent texts in numerical linear algebra is another. Case closed. Further tagging is tantamount to vandalism. --KSmrqT 22:31, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: Van Loan edited the 4th edition of Matrix Computation after Gene Golub's passing. Rumor has it, that also the previous editions were mainly written by Van Loan. Should this be mentioned in the article? --141.89.234.16 (talk) 12:09, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Authorship Matrix Computations
Wikipedia talk:Contact us/Article problem/Factual error

message: The intergrity of the historical representation of old York is farse. I am proficient an well read in Greco Roman history being of both greco roman descent and read Latin and Old Greek as well. Eboracum is the Latinized version of Eborakon meaning city of trade Ebora means merchant
in Greco and Old Latin text. Ebura,Evora has nothing to do with a yew tree frabication as represented it is a mere translation of the Celto Iberian and Britanic native tongue that traded Iron,Tin,Silver,wool and even a slave trade.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.173.147.17 (talk) 15:57, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request on 17 December 2011 

message: The intergrity of the historical representation of old York is farse. I am proficient an well read in Greco Roman history being of both greco roman descent and read Latin and Old Greek as well. Eboracum is the Latinized version of Eborakon meaning city of trade Ebora means merchant
in Greco and Old Latin text. Ebura,Evora has nothing to do with a yew tree frabication as represented it is a mere translation of the Celto Iberian and Britanic native tongue that traded Iron,Tin,Silver,wool and even a slave trade.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.173.147.17 (talk) 16:01, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request on 17 December 2011
Talk:John Van Seters

message: +++++++++++++++++++++++
SUGGESTION PUBLISHED HERE DECEMBER 29, 2013:
ALMOST THREE YEARS AGO WIKIPEDIA INDICATED THAT THIS ARTICLE WAS TOO SELF-SERVING.
QUOTE:
A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject. It may require cleanup to comply with Wikipedia's content policies, particularly neutral point of view. Please discuss further on the talk page. (January 2011)
UNQUOTE.
I AM A GENERAL-INTEREST READER, NOT A BIBLICAL SCHOLAR OR AN ARCHAEOLOGIST, BUT WITH AN INTEREST IN THE HISTORICAL VERACITY OF THE "DEUTERONOMIC HISTORY" (SEE https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deuteronomic_history) WHICH MAKES UP THE CORE OF AN IMPORTANT DEBATE NOT JUST AMONG SCHOLARS BUT NOW AMONG LAYMEN LIKE MYSELF.
VAN SETTERS' VIEWS ARE MENTIONED BRIEFLY IN THE FOLLOWING POPULAR GENERAL-INTEREST BOOK THAT HAS CAUSED AN UPROAR AMONG PEOPLE I KNOW (AND WHO ARE IGNORANT ABOUT THEIR BIBLES):
###
The Bible Unearthed
Archaeology’s New Vision of Ancient Israel and the Origin of its Sacred Texts
Israel Finkelstein and Neil Asher Silberman
2001; 
###
IT WOULD BE VERY HELPFUL FOR THIS THREE-YEAR-OLD WIKIPEDIA ENTRY TO BE PEER-REVIEWED AND SHORTENED.
IT IS BORING TO READ ABOUT THIS PERSON'S MIRACULOUS SCHOOLING, AWARDS, AND BIOGRAPHY.
PLEASE REMOVE THE (VERY OBVIOUS) SELF-SERVING EULOGY FROM THIS ENTRY AND BOIL IT DOWN TO THE ESSENTIALS: WHAT ARE HIS THEORIES AND HOW DOES HE SUPPORT THEM? 
THANK YOU. 
-- JOCK STENDER, CHARLESTON, S.C.
  
ABC0987 (talk) 05:36, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks very useful but needs sourcing.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dougweller (talk • contribs) 18:18, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Material suggested to replace current article (apparently by the subject)
Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2006-09-05/Publicgirluk

message: How do we know Publicgirluk was even female? — BRIAN0918 • 2006-09-06 16:23Z
: We don't, really.  Ral315 (talk) 16:57, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It was AGF versus IAR between those who know sexually liberated pretty females and so it all seemed perfectly reasonable versus those who for whatever reason thought a pretty girl contributing a photo her boyfriend took (one of many photos in their personal collection, not a photo taken for the purpose of contributing) of her naked face and chest (no photo showed more skin than you would see at a topless beach) with semen (contributed to illustrate  our "pearl necklace" article) on her face was unlikely and could cause a major problem if the contributor was lying about being the girl in the photo. Everyone acted in accord with their differing perceptions. In the end it was better to end it by any means necessary as the debate was intractable and needed to focus on the general issues raised rather than any specific incident. And indeed, first Publicgirluk and then Jimbo, each in their own way, brought it to a closure. WAS 4.250 21:38, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Still it's funny and telling how policy (besides IAR) seems less important than Jimbo's view that this really isn't what wikipedia is all about. I guess that IAR is there is funny and telling in a whole new way. I'm not sure it was the sexual images that gave rise to this though, it was more how her fan base was turning her user talk page into something that resembled myspace.--Mongreilf 13:37, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

text: Unfortunately, politics and law in the U.S. more or less force wikipedia to insist on verification for a pornographic image, which i consider at least one of the images to be. A large majority of wikipedia's hosting equipment is based in the US, as well as at least 2 (not sure on the others so i wont say) of the board of directors. Because of the US presence I would side with those asking for verification of age or have the images deleted. Publicgirluk could easily have provided age proof, and should have realized that it would be required due to the 2257 law in the US. I really dislike the way that Jimbo's word is law, and that more of a discussion did not take place, but i more or less agree with the end result. I also absolutely HATE the stupid 2257 law in the US, for various reasons. The witchunt on child porn has gotten pretty bad and doesn't really deter any would be lawbreaker or child molester at all - it just drives the pornography industry, and the business that supports pornography, out of the US. --Mattarata 22:27, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

message: ... the images supposedly of Publicgirluk were actually of a Swedish porn actress and model with the name of Linda Lust.  A quick google will find her. Proto::► 20:25, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  As an aside to this story ...
Talk:List of state Green Parties in the U.S.

message: It may be a long time before all state parties have individual wikipedia pages. In the meantime, and to facilitate the development of such pages, it may be a good idea to add external links to the web pages of the state parties.  
Proposed format
* South Carolina Green Party web page
or simply
* South Carolina Green Party  
DJ Silverfish 16:27, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Adding external links

message: To be consistent with the format of the democratic and republican parties, i moved this list of state green parties to the section "State Parties" on the Green Party (United States) page.  I then made this page redirect to that page.Bcharles (talk) 16:39, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved to Green Party (United States)
Talk:Ten Bulls

message: Create re-directs from 'Ox Herding Pictures'. Rentwa 16:30, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. —Saposcat 05:55, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ta! :) . Rentwa 11:26, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: To do

message: This page and the page Ten Bulls are two pages of almost identical text.  They ought to be merged.  Which would be the better name?  "Ten bulls", with a lowercase bull, is more in keeping in wikipedia standards, if I have it right, no? Pfly 08:51, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger-proposal

message: In popular culture, Cat Steven's "Catch Bull at Four" is a successfully album referencing the ox herding pictures.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catch_bull_at_four  —Preceding unsigned comment added by RiceMilk (talk • contribs) 18:36, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Cat Stevens

message: http://dharmafarer.org/wordpress/ should point to http://www.themindingcentre.org/dharmafarer. This might be needed else where also hence it might be good to get a bot to do the URL change.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sirinath (talk • contribs) 15:07, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: External Links

message: In the past I've often read the tenth as not just "Barefooted and naked of breast" or "ragged and barefoot" but DRUNK. There may be an idiom involved here rather than literal translation, but it's at very least suggested, historically, and very important, I would argue, because it's about not being judgmental of human sources of enlightenment, EVEN WHEN THE PERSON IS SEEMINGLY BREAKING PRECEPTS! I suspect there's revisionism here by some in the Buddhist community. I'm not actually interested in a discussion here, I am done with sniping and edit wars that are so common here on Wikipedia. I do want to bring this up for others to make edits or debate the merits of my argument. Thank you. 75.71.166.197 (talk) 20:21, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Drunkenness in the tenth  

message: This is a completely different formulation of meditation, removed this and put it back to the samatha page.Javier F.V. 20:17, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Nine mental abidings
Talk:The Fair Maid of Perth

message: The entire plot summary reads as if someone took every 10th or 20th line of the book and wrote it verbatim. I have not read the story and the summary sounds like it is reminding a person about the book's plot when it should sound like it is explaining to someone with no prior knowledge instead. It's hard to follow (or at least it is for me) for multiple reasons. A few are: when a comment refers back to something that previously happened, it isn't clear as to what the previous event was; it frequently uses "him" or "her" without enough information to know who "him" or "her" is; new characters are introduced without any background explaining who they are; and too many more problems to list. If I read the book I'm sure  this would be an excellent way to refresh my memory about it. Since I haven't, I'm honestly just confused by it instead.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by PredaClone (talk • contribs) 13:25, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

message: The title character's name appears 25 times in this article. In nine case, it is spelled Catharine; in the other 16 Catherine. In the book, it is always spelled with an a (at least, in the edition that I read). I can go ahead and change every instance of Catherine to Catharine in the article, but I thought I would check here first, in case anyone knows a good reason not to do this. -- Mike Marchmont (talk) 18:50, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, , for that clarification - very helpful. I see you also added an explanation to the main article. -- Mike Marchmont (talk) 07:48, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistent spelling of her name