lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Woodchuck Hard Cider

message: Brkmyr, where have you seen Woodchuck Raspberry?  I've never heard of it, and the company website doesn't list it.  - Jeffhos 06:26, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Raspberry?

message: Removed "only available Autumn of 2009" and replaced with "available September and October". It's out again this year (2010). see   ---Harlowint 03:26, 11 Sep 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  edit to [[Woodchuck Fall Cider]] 

message: As an employee of Woodchuck Hard Cider I would like to suggest some changes as there are more products available than those listed in the current article and some of the facts about the ciders can be expanded upon. As an employee I obviously can't make these changes myself, but I thought I'd share what I know and some articles verifying the information.
'''
Under Core Varieties: 
Woodchuck Crisp should be added.
Articles verifying this: 
http://www.pitchengine.com/woodchuckcider/woodchuck-hard-cider-announces-new-core-product
http://www.beerpulse.com/2011/11/woodchuck-crisp-gets-its-own-6-pack/
I would also suggest that in regards to Woodchuck Amber, it is available in 12 pack cans.
Articles verifying this:
12 pack cans: 
http://www.beerpulse.com/2012/04/woodchuck-amber-coming-to-cans/
http://beerstreetjournal.com/woodchuck-now-shipping-amber-cider-in-cans/
Under limited releases:
Summer is made by adding blueberry juice to the cider. 
Article verifying this:
http://ma.worldclassbeer.com/beerspy/product/woodchuck-limited-edition-summer-cider/7713/
Under Private Reserves:
First off, The Oak Aged is not a private reserve. It was a limited release cider that was renamed "Winter." The Colonial was also never a Private Reserve. It was a core variety that was discontinued.
There are three Private reserves at this point that it could probably be a bulleted list.
Aside from Pumpkin and Barrel Select, there is also now Woodchuck Hard Cider Private Reserve Belgian White.
Articles with information on this product:
http://www.ratebeer.com/beer/woodchuck-private-reserve-belgian-white/166975/
http://www.beerpulse.com/2012/02/woodchuck-belgian-white-joins-private-reserve-series/
http://www.brewbound.com/news/woodchuck-cider-announces-belgian-white-a-private-reserve-cider
In addition to the sections already in the article I would also suggest adding a section for Farmhouse Select
Farmhouse Select verification:
http://www.beerpulse.com/2011/11/woodchuck-original-91-inaugural-farmhouse-select-series-cider-debuts-late-november/
I tried to pull this information from places other than the website to back up the suggestions I've made.
Devin1682 (talk) 15:34, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for posting this here, Devin. I'm going to try to work up some changes to the article based on your information this afternoon. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 16:52, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestions for changes to this article
Talk:Virginia Hey

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 21:40, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: Although the IMDb (which is not considered 100% reliable) has her birth year as 1952 (which would make her an unlikely 54 years old), other sources give her year of birth as 1959 and the Farscape fansite www.crichtonisms.com says 1962. So which is it? I'm going with 1959 as that is what was originally used in this article. For the record, the IMDB is the ONLY place I have ever seen a 1952 birth year used (other pages appear to simply be using the info from IMDb). If it's going to be changed back to 1952, then a citation from an OFFICIAL source -- not a user-edited source like IMDb or a celeb nudie pictures site -- needs to be cited otherwise it'll just get changed again. And if someone can confirm that the 1952 date is wrong, the IMDb needs to be informed about this. For my part, I was once a member of her mailing and I remember something in an e-mail about a 40th or 41st birthday party only a few years ago. Using the Archive.org Wayback Machine (since her official site appears to be not completely online anymore) there's no indication of her age in her online biography. There's a mention of her attending art school with her mum in 1971, but that's not uncommon for children so isn't really an indicator one way or the other. 23skidoo 17:05, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Birthdate controversy

message: I don't think a 1952 birth year is that unlikely, mainly because (despite what you've said) it IS pretty unlikely that she was attending a diploma-granting program at age 12.  Unless college is far different in Australia...
:Please "sign" your posts with four tildes (~~~~). For the record, in 1977 the Australian Woman's Weekly said she was aged 25. And in a Facebook post dated May 2019 announcing her retirement, she said she was 67 years old. These both support the 1952 birth year. (But in 1983 the Sydney Morning Herald claimed she was only 28 years old – suggesting a 1955 birth year. Go figure.) Muzilon (talk) 11:03, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  More on the Birthdate controversy (con-TROV-er-sy?) 

message: "... for which she was nominated for best supporting actress."
You forgot to mention what award she was nominated for. SharkD 05:47, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Finish the sentence

message: This article relies too heavily on the IMDb which is not considered a reliable source of information. 68.146.81.123 (talk) 14:18, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Poorly sourced
Talk:Turner, Maine

message: After whom is this place named ? Jay 07:05, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: According to The Names of Maine by Brian McCauley (Acadia Press, 2004), Turner is named after a Reverend Charles Turner, orginally of Duxbury, Massaschusetts, who was associated somehow with the proprietors of what is now the town of Turner, and eventually settled in the area. JamesofMaine 02:11, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Named after who?

message: Does anybody know Charlie and Carmen Bennet? My wife and I have been trying to get back in touch with them.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.237.247.174 (talk) 19:32, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You can ask at the reference desk. Jay (talk) 04:10, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Charlie and Carmen Bennet
Talk:Five Wisdom Buddhas

message: Aren't the terms "Buddha" and "Bodhisattva" getting confused in this article?Dustin Asby 08:31, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: No, these beings are routinely described as Buddhas by those who believe in them.  Whether the underlying theory is confused is another issue.  I'm not sure anyone describes them as bodhisattvas. - Nat Krause 08:57, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Nat is right. An early Mahayana sutra talks about the Buddha Akshobhya, and  the universe within which he turned the wheel of Dharma, along with a prayer for being reborn there.  The five Dhyani Buddhas are most certainly Buddhas. However, the Five Wisdom Kings are often called Bodhisattvas, though many consider them to be Buddhas manifesting as Bodhisattvas. (Nat, I feel that maybe Wisdom King and Five Wisdom Kings should be merged.) (20040302 21:48, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Einar Gerhardsen

message: I revised this article by removing some obscure and some less than neutral sentences.
--Thorsen 09:05, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: How about here  or here --Mycomp (talk) 04:34, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The suggestion that Norway's PM for much of the period 19450-1965 was a Soviet spy needs more detail, or should be deleted as fanciful.203.80.61.102 (talk) 04:28, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Soviet spy 

message: Hi,
there is a "citation needed" tag on "Gerhardsen's political legacy is still an important force in Norwegian politics ...".
Perhaps the sentence is too strongly worded, and, as a summary, comes close to OR or SYNTH.
Gerhardsen's personal influence must have ended, one might assume, with his death in 1987; otoh many institutions that were innovations of his governments continue to exist, and form the general topography of politics to this day, e.g. the corporatist economic model, the technocratic governance, the NATO membership but resistance to nuclear weapons, etc.. Of course there have been many, many changes, but the Gerhardsen model is what these changes are made to. IOW there are good reasons to claim that Gerhardsen's political legacy is still an important force in Norwegian politics; the problem is that if inclusion in Wikipedia rests on finding exact quotes for every line, this line might fail the test. 
My strictly personal opinion is that if the article was about Norwegian poitics, one might perhaps improve the article by specifying this claim a little further, but as the article is about Gerhardsen, one might defend it as a sort of tribute to his work.
The SNL article on him ( https://snl.no/Einar_Gerhardsen ) has a link to an article ( https://snl.no/Norge_i_etterkrigstiden ) on Norway's post-WWII years, where Gerhardsen is a major figure, and which describes much of the politics, if anyone wants to detail them.
T 88.89.217.90 (talk) 17:07, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Political legacy
Talk:Knot invariant

message: This page says that the Fary-Milnor theorem is if and only if. However, the page for that theorem implies that only one direction holds. I don't know enough about the theorem to be comfortable touching either page, though.
: The statement was corrected 2006 August 27. -- Chuck 13:24, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fary-Milnor theorem
Talk:Islamic clothing

message: — Assignment last updated by EmPatch (talk) 03:31, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Women and Gender in the Middle East

message: West Africa has the most Muslims in Africa. How are those muslims dress styles exempt from this Wikipedia page? Researcherofgreatness (talk) 13:27, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hijab in other African countries? 

message: I propose that this article flattens what is a spectrum of dress by many quite different groups who share self-identity as muslims by staying close to a narrative that “muslims” wear “muslim clothes” and seeking little further depth in its ethnography. In other words, a lazy description of an Other made firmly from within the comfort of the white gaze.
Furthermore, several sections almost exclusively highlight perceived problems with “muslim clothes” at length, which is tantamount to a description of a mode of dress as a vehicle for prejudice.
This article should be at the very least heavily moderated. 95.23.96.15 (talk) 03:23, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  “Islamic dress” inherently white-washed terminology 

message: Almost the entire page is about the veil, but the veil isn't the only Islamic dress. If possible, please add information and texts about the male Islamic clothing as well, the only thing in this page about the male Islamic clothing is that they should cover their body from the navel to the knees with clothes. 36.71.142.129 (talk) 08:11, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The lack of information about male Islamic clothing
Talk:Second Geneva Convention

message: In the context of the Geneva Conventions timeline:
* First Geneva Convention of 1864 on the treatment of battlefield casualties
* Second Geneva Convention of 1906 extending the first convention to war at sea
* Third Geneva Convention of 1929 on the treatment of prisoners of war
* Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949 on the treatment of civilians during wartime
this paragraph of the Second Geneva Convention article:
:It was written and adopted at the diplomatic conference held at Geneva from April 21 to August 12, 1949, for the purpose of revising the Hague Convention of 1907 for the Adaptation to Maritime Warfare of the Principles of the Geneva Convention of 1906.
seems to provide the date of the Fourth Geneva Convention instead of the Second, and explains that it extends the Second (1906) instead of the First Geneva Convention. It also explains that the purpose of the Second Geneva Convention (1906) was revising the Hague Convention of 1907 (a year later). I am removing that facts that are inconsistent. Rafał Pocztarski 09:20, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Insert (filmmaking)

message: The example is not an example at all. It best it should be re-labeled as "references in popular culture" or something similar
92.247.214.95 (talk) 20:58, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Precisely, though that phrase is really annoying, its what we use. a similar term Hardcore insert, was created and is being proposed for deletion. That is the correct action, but i removed a list of films with hardcore inserts from that stub and placed it here. it may end up being a poor list, but its potentially useful information, so ive put it here. the term "piston shot" is mentioned, but no ref given as to whether the term is actually used. i wont research it myself right now.(mercurywoodrose)75.61.132.26 (talk) 05:50, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Example
Talk:Penza

message: I'm going to add it as an external link Penza Online. I hope thats okay.  Moverick 01:40, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Adding the New Resource about Penza City

message: To add to this article: the etymology of Penza. 173.88.246.138 (talk) 14:48, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: To add to article

message: To add to this article: a map of the city of Penza. 173.88.246.138 (talk) 23:47, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map of the city
Talk:Tim Dorsey

message: Serge Storm is one of three fictional serial killers (defined by killing more than 6 people) who lives in Florida  and is written about in a humorous fashion. There's Clinton Tyree, aka "Skink," Carl Hiaasen and Dexter Morgan Jeff Lindsay. Don't know if it can or should be added to this article? Nitpyck (talk) 08:46, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  serial killer 

message: This article needs additional citations of reliable sources. An author's own website is not a reliable source. A single interview with the Boston Globe is the only reliable source cited, and I would not call an interview with a biographical article's subject a "reliable" source for information on on that person. In fact, if this writer is so little known and reported on, one must question his WP:NOTABILITY. --Quisqualis (talk) 19:18, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Entirely promotion OR article 

message: First! I am the first to report that he just died as reported on some news sites like 15 minutes ago.
First! This isn't a joke or a vandalism, either, I'm just excited because this is the first time I've ever seen a celeb death report and then gotten to their Wikipedia article before anyone had added their demise to the article. Sorry. 70.165.75.121 (talk) 23:03, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  He's dead now
Talk:Serge A. Storms

message: This is one of the best short Wikipedia articles I've ever read.  Thumbs up, subby.
  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.224.167.161 (talk) 02:49, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Could we get definitive confirmation on the details of the murder mentioned in the article? I could swear it took place on a baseball field at night, but it has been edited to indicate that it was inside a garden shed. -DynSkeet (talk)
No, the one in the baseball field was Jack Terrier. The one in the shed was Debbie's boyfreind, who had been breaking Serge's rules of the neighborhood. Both did happen, though.--Kedalfax 21:07, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Triggerfish Twist'' hula hoop death 

message: Some parts of this article talk only about his killings, others about his life. Can somebody fix it so it reads better for someone looking for specific information?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.247.244.120 (talk) 16:52, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The only thing wrong with this article is that it describes Serge's ethics as "subjective" when clearly Kant's objective ethics and Serge's are one and the same.86.212.29.3 (talk) 15:19, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistent Data 

message: नमस्काए नेपाली समचार (talk) 13:25, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  नेपालमा के हुदै छ ?
Talk:Augusta, New Jersey

message: Removed the 1,555 population figure as it has no basis in fact.  Anyone familiar with the Augusta area can attest to the fact that the census is incorrect as much as it is thoroughly unreasonable.  Augusta consists of about ten houses, a bank, and a roadside flower stand.  A railroad freight depot was the only reason this town appears on maps.  I suspect the Census Bureau drew a 2-3 mile line from the Augusta post office (which, ironically isn't anywhere near Augusta) then used that line as a diameter for a circle and assumed that the population within that huge circle constituted the hamlet that we know as Augusta.  Incorrect and illogical, and as thus it has no place in such an article. --ExplorerCDT 11:07, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, did not realize you had first-hand information (I live in Washington state). No need to be grouchy or anything. Bumm13 12:59, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Talk:WinMX

message: I was a WinMX user for some ten years, and I met many good friends during that time. Any other wikipedians have similar experiences? --Zhane Masaki (talk) 23:04, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  The WinMX Community still thrives? 

message: I have removed the citation point for the winmxphoenix entry as the citation point linked to an existing citation that had nothing to do with the winmxphoenix website and I believe was placed there in error, the citation linked to is number 4 and is currently correct.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.159.219.23 (talk) 09:03, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation Removed  

message: This section has by far reached an edit war and the three-revert rule. The issue needs to be discussed before more waring occurs. — CobraWiki ( jabber | stuff ) 01:22, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I have several issues with the section:
# Performing an all-language Google search, not including other sites that mirror Wikipedia's content or are themselves wikis, I cannot find any valid sources for this data.
# The only source that has been provided leads to a forum in Italian. Scanning the four topics in this section, none make any mention of "b0nolis Code" which makes the source invalid.
# Even if valid sources are provided, the section is unclear to me in general.
# What I believe is being described is something that is not a third-party program that aids WinMX, but something mostly unrelated similar to if LimeWire was added as a third-party program for WinMX, which it should not be.
In my opinion, there is no validity at all in this section's inclusion anywhere on Wikipedia. — CobraWiki ( jabber | stuff ) 07:10, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed it again. It's not in any way related to WinMX. 81.71.53.254 (talk) 12:30, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The b0nolis Code 

message: I notice an edit has been made with a sarcastic commentary to an update I made concerning news of the new client, as I myself am working on the new client I of course feel an authority enough to make clear any changes in the projects status, the project was shown publicly here 
http://forum.winmxworld.com/index.php/topic,11644.0.html
Although its not at release status so there are no public downloads to be obtained yet the project is ongoing and fully alive with a src forge page here for the actual release
http://sourceforge.net/projects/mxcoders/
Please leave my informational edits alone.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.180.18.234 (talk) 22:27, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: And why not make correct citations for the statements in the article? Because as is it sounds like: "oooh, some big site says wishiwashi and while all other client projects died away, this one continues the struggle". Just like: *rooooar*. So why only link it here, in the talk-section? --Schattenspieler (talk) 02:19, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replacement Client Notifications
Talk:Architecture of Limerick

message: There was a wonderful article in the Irish Times today by Frank McDonald on Limerick that made me think this deserved a page. Feel free to help Seabhcan 11:33, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: No bother! My content may need edited for NPOV. Our despicable lack of planning laws, and indeed planning, have ripped huge holes out of Limerick's architectural heritage in particular. And as regards that which remains? Well, William Street is a dump, and even O'Connell Street is an ugly mismatch of Georgian, modern and ugly buildings with fastfood signage and ugly shopfronts. The abominable lack of organised street furniture and paving doesn't help. Truly Limerick must be the scruffiest city in Ireland (no matter whether there are or aren't litter problems). zoney ♣ talk 14:29, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Fresh 92.7

message: Hello, Fresh FM is now officially called Fresh 92.7 can the article title be changed? --Mcardlej (talk) 02:07, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
Talk:The Kick Inside

message: Isn't it strange that the main article Kate Bush has more details about this album that this article itself? --ToastieIL 12:34, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  More details on the main article 

message: The alternate cover shown is actually the US reissue on the EMI America label. The original US pressing was on EMI's Harvest imprint and has the same sleeve photo as the Canadian issue (also on the Harvest label).--J2 00:29, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Different Album Covers 

message: There are some great longer-form reviews of TKI in the critical reception section, but they're mostly from US sources. (Quite unusual/interesting, as Kate was little-known in the USA at the time of TKI's release).  
I've added the 'globalize' tag in it the hope that editors may know of British reviews (contemporary with the release or later) to give a better balance to the section/article. If you know if any, please be bold and add them! :) I will, of course, also see if I can track some down myself.  ChrisMacAlex (talk) 22:34, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Critical reception US-centric
Talk:Westonbirt Arboretum

message: I've managed to find out a bit more about this place, and have added some more information and an extra reference.
I'm not certain exactly who "Lord Morley" is, and I've been unable to find an article for him here.  Any ideas?
: Stuz 12:00, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: He was the Earl of Morley. I've linked to that article, but he doesn't have one of his own. Osomec 22:49, 6 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: It's a start
Talk:Field norm

message: what about the definition, norm on F is map from F to R satisfying:
1) N(a) = 0 iff a = 0
2) N(ab) = N(a)N(b)
3) triangle inequality
this is also called a "field norm" in some contexts. Revolver 12:19, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, you're right. I've been reading Koblitz the past few weeks, and he uses the term "field norm" for "valuation", so that's probably why I thought this, but yes, valuation is more standard. Revolver 13:35, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)

text: No, sorry, doesn't use "field norm" for "valuation", not sure he uses anything for valuation. But I have seen "absolute value" or "valued field" for what you would call what you get from a valuation into the positive reals under multiplication, except the "ultra" part isn't required, (if that makes sense). Revolver 13:51, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)