lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Double auction

message: This seems to be a direct copy of http://www.agorics.com/Library/Auctions/auction6.html 83.86.72.104 23:05, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Just so the above doesn't cause confusion--the above link no longer exists, and the current page is new and completely different than the one when that comment was posted. CRETOG8(t/c) 05:42, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: direct copy

message: The Wikipedia article only considers batched trading mechanisms where all orders are evaluated simultaneously.  Sequential trading, such as occurs on the stock and commodity markets, is more commonly represented in the double auction experiments literature.  Such sequential trading generally consists of maintaining a limit order book and bid-ask improvement rules.  Probably the most well known examples of double auction experiments are those reported in Vernon Smith's 1962 paper, An Experimental Study of Competitive Market Behavior in The Journal of Political Economy. That and a lifetime of subsequent work led to an award of the "Nobel prize" in Economics in 2002.  Another early example of double auctions would be the lab software for sequential
trading described by Plott and Gray (1989), "The Multiple Unit Double Auction" https://authors.library.caltech.edu/81363/  -- which describes the LAN-based markets run at Caltech in the 1980s and early 1990s.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.57.84.245 (talk) 22:26, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Omits Sequential Double Auctions
Talk:Lake Michigan College

message: ok i would like to know the scholarships this collage offers and its musical standards! ASAP
-Hi!  Once I return home from my vacation, I plan on gathering up all the information I can find and expanding this article since it is missing a lot of important information.  I've mostly fixed spelling errors so far, and I plan on adding information currently available on the website for now.
As far as scholarships go, Lake Michigan College puts out a booklet that lists all the scholarships you can apply for.
As far as the music program, I hear it's very good, and when I update the article, I'll know why it's good.
Shadowrei 0 09:21, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Basil van Rooyen

message: I personally know the subject of this article, and Basil indeed passed away yesterday, 14 September 2023, of mesothelioma. Have read through WP:BDP and cannot find RS at this stage that confirm his death (only this). Do we just retain as is? — CR4ZE (T • C) 02:11, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Basil's death
Talk:Tetraclinis

message: Everything I always read about the harvesting of burls from this tree has said that harvesting the does not injure the tree. It's similar to cutting off a branch. This article does not cite any sources indicating the basis for this statement that harvesting burls kills the tree, and it is contrary to what woodworkers have to say about the burl. 
If indeed damage is done, is it because of improper harvesting techniques? Over-aggressive harvesting of burl wood from a single tree? Is it possible that better procedures can preserve the tree, and make harvesting sustainable? I am sure that even if trees are dying from this that there is a line where responsible harvesting will cause no lasting damage.
I am going to challenge the accuracy of the article as a result, this kind of information needs to be substantiated because it is possibly politically motivated, and it is in the interest of everyone who uses this wood to know whether or not it kills the tree or allows the tree to live, and if it is indeed killing these trees, getting the knowledge out there properly might allow for people who care about this wood and using it as well as preserving biodiversity, to act appropriately. Mars11 16:44, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Accuracy

message: Someone recently changed "burl" to "burr" everywhere on this page. I haven't bothered to look at who.
From what I see online, "burl" seems to be the more accepted term, unless "burr" is used in a distinct sense here.
"Burr" is some places described as a misspelling of "burl".
I guess the main thing is to be consistent, though.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.48.48.19 (talk) 16:50, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  burr vs. burl? 
Talk:Widdringtonia

message: Plants bear both male and female cones: so they are  monoecious 197.94.64.63 (talk) 16:34, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Widdringtonia is not dioecious.  

message: Widdringtonia wallichii - has again become Widdringtonia cedarbergensis. 197.94.64.63 (talk) 16:35, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Widdringtonia wallichii
Talk:Nancy McNally

message: "Dr. McNally did not appear in the first season of The West Wing, a season which saw several notable international crises (the Indian invasion of Pakistan, for example). She was likely appointed after "Celestial Navigation", when HUD Secretary Deborah O'Leary was the "highest-ranking African-American woman in [U.S.] government"."
Actually, that's not neccessarily the case. If you're talking about the constitutional order of succession, the HUD secretary is eligible to become president (13th in line), whereas the National Security Advisor isn't. Moreover, the NSA is primarily an advisor to the president, wheras the HUD secretary has policy responsibilities. So you could arguably say that in terms of absolute rank, the HUD secretary has a higher "rank" than the National Security Advisor, despite the gravity of the latter's duties. 69.19.24.253 23:11, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: When in the final season does it say she becomes National Security Agency Director? I remember at times it referred to her as former NS Advisor and her reporting that the NS Agency had tapped Santos' phone, but I don't remember it directly mentioning her promotion to Director of the NSA. EJB341 18:47, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  National Security Agency Director? 

message: She was likely appointed after "Celestial Navigation", when HUD Secretary Deborah O'Leary was the "highest-ranking African-American woman in [U.S.] government".
:This seems dubious.  A cabinet secretary is considered higher-ranking than any White House staffer, including the Chief of Staff, although obviously the latter often have more real power. john k (talk) 22:58, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree and have removed that statement from the article. Besides, what is "likely" to have happened is speculative (i.e. original research). --Hnsampat (talk) 23:30, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  HUD vs. National Security Advisor 

message: There isn't much information available about Nancy McNally besides plot summary. As such, I say we merge it to List of characters on The West Wing. --Hnsampat (talk) 23:33, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal
Talk:Juniperus procumbens

message: Se comenta por foros de bonsái que el Juniperus procumbers nana se extinguió en la naturaleza por la excesiva extracción de ejemplares en la naturaleza y que solo existe de forma cultivada. No encuentro información que verifique si este hecho es cierto. 185.75.200.243 (talk) 16:14, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extinción del sonare
Talk:NWA World Television Championship

message: The Fightful article that says Zicky Dice has been released from NWA is ambiguous as it says he has not been officially released.  In the interview, Zicky Dice stated that his original agreement is till the end of the year.  Not everybody on the roster is signed.  WrestleZone confirmed that what Observer reported was false.  With that, the article will be changed back to him still being the current champion.  Mr. C.C.Hey yo!I didn't do it! 22:40, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zicky Dice
Talk:Juniperus cedrus

message: Vertical cliffs harbor millennia-old junipers in the Canary Islands claims to have found a population of trees older than 1,000 years.
The article has been peer-reviewed but not typeset.
Access is not immediate. 
Somebody with access to the final version of the article may want to quote it.
--Error (talk) 12:57, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Millennial population
Talk:Cupressus cashmeriana

message: I think that the references to cultivars should be removed. My research indicates that there are no listed cultivars of this tree, so there may be some confusion here with, for example, cultivars of the other 'weeping cypress', C. nootkatensis.¬¬¬¬  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.205.143.153 (talk) 09:40, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Hesperocyparis macnabiana

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved.  – robertsky (talk) 02:23, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Support: While the monophyly of Cupressus with respect to Juniperus is an open question, it is paraphyletic with respect to Xanthocyparis and Callitropsis; if the latter two genera are to be retained then the principal of monophyly requires the recognition of Hesperocyparis. Lavateraguy (talk) 09:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

text: * The Cupressus Conservation Project was discussed at plants, and found to be wanting in the face of usage in papers and major floral databases. I also see that you seem to have missed s question regarding your attachment to the project. You keep saying the data is "equivocal", but you also keep ignoring that the split is in use in the literature now and the last comment by The Cupressus project (as an "editorial") is nearly 7 years out of date.  Also none of these (The Cupressus Conservation Project, IUCN, and GBIF) are the WP:Plants base databases that we decided to use for plant taxonomy, that would be POWO, which accepts the split.--Kevmin § 17:02, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: *if you are a certain arboriculturist from England who is also on the board of The Cupressus Conservation Project you are straying close to COI territory--Kevmin § 17:14, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

text: Error on my part. I left off Cupressus arizonica var. glabra which should be moved to Hesperocyparis glabra, currently a redirect. @Kj cheetham, is it possible to add the page into the move request or should I open a separate move request for it? 🌿MtBotany (talk) 18:29, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Given it's another Cupressus one, I think it'll be okay to add, so I have. Hopefully the bot will notice it and appropriately flag that page. -Kj cheetham (talk) 20:25, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

text: @Kj cheetham, the discussion ended up essentially the same place that it did on WT:PLANTS and there has been a full week for any objections to the addition of the Hesperocyparis glabra move. Should I ping you or another editor for a close on this request? 🌿MtBotany (talk) 01:15, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 11 February 2024
Talk:Julia Murney

message: Oh my gosh, when I saw Julia in Wicked,  I was stupified.   Her "Defying Gravity"  is the best one out of every Elphaba so far.  She surpasses Idina, Shoshana, and all the others.  However,  Kendra Kassebaum is second to Kristin Chenoweth.   Kristin is an amazing actress(I'm sorry Kendra)as Glinda.  sorry, I forgot to log in and leave my name.Meldshal42 19:15, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Common assault

message: I am just a little confused on this article as in the introductory paragraph it states that assault is defined in s39 of the CJA 1988 yet further on into the article, it says that the offence is not defined by the said Act of Parliament only the sentence is defined.
I would normally change such an anomaly myself straight away, but I'd like to hear what other editors have to say. --Dean Sharpe 23:17, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Defined by? 

message: "common assault is a crime when the defendant apprehends immediate use of unlawful violence"
- this should be either "a victim" apprehends, or "defendant causes another to apprehend", as I don't think it is a crime to apprehend violence! 90.205.51.234 (talk) 21:07, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree this first line is confusing and could be worded in a non-legalistic way, given that the full definition follows. Agentwhim (talk) 14:52, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect first line 

message: This is a species of aggravated assault.  I think that in this context "common" means "not aggavated". I suggest that this section belongs in a discussion of aggravated assaults generally.James500 (talk) 18:51, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assault on a constable 

message: I think that the discussion of actual bodily harm contained in the paragraph below is outside of the scope of this article, so I have moved it to this page until I decide what to do with it:
The distinction between common assault and assault occasioning actual bodily harm under section 47 of the Offences against the Person Act 1861, lies in the degree of injury that results. Actual bodily harm is more than “transitory” but less than “really serious injury” which is the definition of grievous bodily harm under sections 18 and 20 of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861.
James500 (talk) 07:12, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outside the scope of this article 

message: The introduction section to this article is one of the worst I've read on Wikipedia. Even after four readings I don't understand most of what it is trying to say as it contradicts itself over at least two issues and uses seemingly random tense. Normally I would try and fix these sorts of problems myself but I don't have time to spend figuring out what it is trying to say before I can even start to work out how to fix it. Thryduulf (talk) 17:27, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction very confusing
Talk:Juanita Hall

message: I added a sentence about where she was living just before she died, with a reference to a source website. Ms. Hall would walk with me when I was walking to school back then. I was just in the first grade and walked right by the Percy Williams home everyday, and we somehow struck up an acquaintance. I had no idea who she was, other than a sweet elderly lady who wanted some company for her morning walk. The only clue I ever had was that she told me she played Bloody Mary in South Pacific. It wasn't until many years later that I was able to find out any more about her. I understand that this is all "original research," but Ms. Hall and the Percy Williams Actors Home both seem to deserve a more extensive description in Wikipedia and elsewhere, and I'm surprised at how little about either one there is online. Does anyone have any info that can fill in Ms. Hall's final months, or any general info about the Percy Williams Actors Home?Lafong (talk) 04:34, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Percy Williams
Talk:Verney family of Middle Claydon

message: Cleanup tag still required, although hopefully with some more edits I will be able to remove itTrepur99 23:22, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: He is still alive bytheway (:  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.71.15.47 (talk) 22:20, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the 102 years old(?) Guy Verney whom played Melancthon in the 1953 film Martin Luther of this same Verney stock?
Talk:Tsuga

message: If the Japanese Kana writing is correct, the pronunciation is wrong (should be with a short "u").  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.50.59.73 (talk) 18:55, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

message: The phylogeny is sorely outdated. See [Feng et al. 2021] for most current and best supported phylogeny of the genus. 2600:6C5A:443F:6E54:590B:8C83:5F20:20D (talk) 20:18, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phylogeny
Talk:Pinus mugo

message: In line with Wikipedia:Naming_conventions_(flora)#Scientific_versus_common_names I'd like to move this page to Pinus mugo. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 15:19, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Choess (talk) 19:12, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page title 

message: Indeed, Cornus erythrocarpa should be removed from "Subspecies, cultivars, and forms" list in the box. --Djadjko (talk) 02:24, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: . --Djadjko (talk) 23:36, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cornus erythrocarpa 

message: The picture in the box at the top is Pinus pinea.
Good alternative pictures at Wikispecies or Wikidata.
82.42.70.116 (talk) 17:43, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks!  Peter coxhead (talk) 08:02, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture
Talk:Shturcite

message: The page said that "they are still the most successful Bulgarian music band". I am not sure this can be verified, and while I am not much of a pop music fan, I do believe that there are a lot of pop and rock bands that are more popular now. Shturtsite are more like venerable ancient history, I think. So I have removed the claim until it or something similar is sourced. --91.148.159.4 23:23, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Most successful"
Talk:List of Pinus species

message: * http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?as_q=Pinus+classification&num=10&btnG=Search+Scholar&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_occt=title&as_sauthors=&as_publication=&as_ylo=&as_yhi=&as_sdt=1.&as_sdtp=on&as_sdts=5&hl=en
--58.38.42.112 (talk) 08:08, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info about the topic..... 

message: The introduction is badly out of date, as Pinus has not been divided into three subgenera for a long time. Nobody even uses the term Ducampopinus any more -  cladistics and molecular studies since the early 2000s demonstrated this group is artificial and has since become redundant (for example P. krempfii was shown to be contained within Strobus around 15 years ago). Tellingly, no citations seem to have been added since 2010, when this article was tagged as in need of attention. I'm going to go ahead and make a properly referenced introduction to this, and remove mention of the outdated ideas here.
The selection of Pinus species listed here is excellent though!
Atshal (talk) 20:03, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction is badly out of date 

message: I wish it weren't such a chore to do so, but it would make more sense to link the "real" name of these species rather than the common names.  The binomial is more likely to the actual article title (as I found at Pinus strobus / Eastern White Pine.  Plus all these common names need to be decapped... so much work... Huw Powell (talk) 01:10, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Linking style 

message: The "?" on P. latteri is due to the uncertain nature on if its placement within Pinus Sect. Pinea, subsect. Pinaster, and thus should not be removed. Regarding Pinus maestrensis, per both the International plant names index and The gymnosperm database this taxon is currently treated as a subspecies (at best) of Pinus cubensis, which is why its not in the list.--Kevmin § 19:38, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for clarifying. Heh0002 (talk) 20:08, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Pinus maestrensi'' and "?"
Talk:Pinus peuce

message: I just edited the way this shows up in the category "Pinus."  It had been set up to alphabetize there under the common name, "Macedonian Pine."  But this didn't make sense since it showed on the list with the binomial (scientific) name.  So I changed it to realphabetize it that way.  But I added the Redirect page to the Category.  So now, the common name does show.   140.147.236.194 (talk) 16:10, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edited for categories
Talk:Chihuahua white pine

message: I edited this to change the sort order on the page for the :Category:Pinus.  It had been set to alphabetize under Pine.  That might make sense for categories where there are a lot of trees and a few of them are pines; then all the pines group together.  But on the page where everything is a pine, it made more sense to alphabetize under Chihuahua.   71.126.140.136 (talk) 10:19, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit to improve sort order in Category Pinus
Talk:Pinus rigida

message: To the original person who compiled this information, I made a slight change to the first line of the article. Originally it said:
The Pitch Pine (Pinus rigida) is a small-to-medium sized (6-30 m) tree, often contorted due to fire or weather.
and I changed it to:
The Pitch Pine (Pinus rigida) is a small-to-medium sized (6-30 m) tree, which grows irregularly which many consider "ugly."
I made this change as I have not seen a reference confirming the tree is distorted because of fire or weather. The tree grows like this normally due to the barren conditions it is accustomed to. I imagine this is the niche of the growth pattern of the pitch pine.
Xtimgx (talk) 17:43, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

message: I edited this to change the sort order on the page for the :Category:Pinus.  It had been set to alphabetize under Pine.  That might make sense for categories where there are a lot of trees and a few of them are pines; then all the pines group together.  But on the page where everything is a pine, it made more sense to alphabetize under Pitch.    140.147.236.194 (talk) 17:53, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit to improve sort order in category Pinus 

message: This does not seem to be a common name or even a known name for pitch pine in the US. Is there any source or reference for this naming?? Google returns no links on the name "Garside Tree".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.160.218.42 (talk) 19:49, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: "Garside Tree"

message: Moved article to scientific name Famartin (talk) 13:56, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved
Talk:Pinus resinosa

message: I edited this to change the sort order on the page for the :Category:Pinus.  It had been set to alphabetize under Pine.  That might make sense for categories where there are a lot of trees and a few of them are pines; then all the pines group together.  But on the page where everything is a pine, it made more sense to alphabetize under Red.    140.147.236.194 (talk) 19:10, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit to improve sort order in category Pinus
Talk:Pinus amamiana

message: I just edited the way this shows up in the category "Pinus."  It had been set up to alphabetize there under the common name, "Yakushima White Pine."  But this didn't make sense since it showed on the list with the binomial (scientific) name.  So I changed it to realphabetize it that way.  But I added the Redirect page to the Category.  So now, the common name does show.   140.147.236.194 (talk) 18:10, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edited for categories
Talk:Pinus parviflora

message: I edited this to change the sort order on the page for the :Category:Pinus.  It had been set to alphabetize under Pine.  That might make sense for categories where there are a lot of trees and a few of them are pines; then all the pines group together.  But on the page where everything is a pine, it made more sense to alphabetize under Japanese White.    140.147.236.194 (talk) 15:04, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit to improve sort order in category Pinus 
Talk:Boris / Tomsk 7

message: I've got this release on black, grey and red wax; the latter is limited to 100 copies according to the label, but there isn't a web source to cite, so I didn't want to add to the description. However, the description states that the grey vinyl was also limited to 100, but I find it hard to believe since it's so common; is there anywhere with information on the pressings? I've removed that part until there's a source for the pressing info. I'm also skeptical of the pressing figure - 1000 seems too much for a 7" so early in their career. 82.18.49.148 22:47, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pressings?