lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Bodil Koch

message: The recent expansion is basically good, but nevertheless contains statements that are inherently not verifiable facts. A couple of examples:
*"A lady in her own right" - what does that mean? 
*"Now that she had been fighting for women to get into politics she thought she had to commit herself fully as an elected official." - we can't know what people think. 
*"Women all over the country, from Copenhagen to rural areas in Jutland were enthusiastic and participated in study groups and gave speeches about the problems of the Danish society." - the word enthusiastic brings us into the same problem as above.
Hemmingsen 16:03, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, there are verifiable facts connected to them, so minor rewordings is all I am looking for. I will take a look at it myself, as well, if I find the time before you do. Hemmingsen 19:07, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I pulled myself together and changed the parts, I was unhappy about. You should feel free to change them again, if you're not happy with my edits. Hemmingsen 10:39, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Original research tag
Talk:List of members of the Swiss Council of States (2007–2011)

message: As content shouldn't reside mainly in templates, can we place the current list of members on this page and move Template:Swiss Council of States members, 2003-2007 back to List of members of the Swiss Council of States (2003-2007)? For this page, I'd adopt the same structure as for List of members of the Swiss National Council (2007-2011). -- User:Docu
:I am sorry, but I see simply no point in having this list article separate from Swiss Council of States, unless it aims at (ultimately) listing all historical members. A list of just the current members obviously belongs in the Swiss Council of States article, which has hardly any content beyond that. Since this means that the same list will appear both there and here, it makes perfect sense to transclude it. dab (𒁳) 13:15, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Cong (vessel)

message: "It has been suggested that congs were an ancieny form of axle bearing. The rectangular outer surface enables the axle to be braced against a flat suface  such as the wooden base of a cart or a drill bed. Incised tracks on this outer suface allow for the bearing to be lashed securely. Similarly, bi discs are an early clutch plate type mechanism for transferring force between axial loads."  Johnbod (talk) 13:32, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  moved here from article 

message: I have an excellent book at home I can reference, and I would love to include links to other associated ritual objects besides the Bi, as described in that book, including those referenced in Dragon Bones, a novel by Lisa See, author of Snow Flower and the Secret Fan. I think these kind of references and links can help to generate greater interest and understanding in other cultures, both historic and contemporary.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beadmatrix (talk • contribs) 11:05, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: 2011
Talk:Storage@home

message: I just finished writing this article, and I have no idea how to use references. I included the links for all the claims I've made, but I need someone else to set it up. Thanks, Lx45803 (talk) 18:33, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, here are instructions or then you could just post the refs here. 85.76.43.22 (talk) 17:22, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: I'm fairly certain this article is short enough to count as a stub, but I don't know what tag that is. If you can add it, please do.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lx45803 (talk • contribs) 18:34, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this a stub? 
Talk:Formulary controversy

message: The Formulary Controversy was not a battle about theology between Jansenists and Jesuits. It was a 17th and 18th century Jansenist recusancy of the Formula of Submission for the Jansenists by a group of Catholic ecclesiastical personnel and teachers who did not accept that their beliefs, about the nature of man and grace, were heretical as the Holy See declared. Later, assent to the Formula of Submission for the Jansenists became a French law. For example, the lead paragraph () is:
Yet, in the body, the article states that
and that
and that
and that
and in the closing paragraph that 
The Jansenism article () dates the Formulary controversy to 1664–1669, but it states, about Vineam Domini Sabaoth, that . So clearly the controversy remained in 1705. I cannot find a reference to the law or if it was repealed before the dechristianisation of France during the French Revolution but there is no reason to believe that the controversy ended in 1705.
Also, the paragraphs do not seem to be in chronological order. The article needs work. —BoBoMisiu (talk) 19:35, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs clarity
Talk:Arthur of Glastonbury

message: I looked at this article as it appears on the cleanup listing for WikiProject Somerset. It seems very unclear whether this person ever existed and I'm having real problems finding any reliable sources to expand and improve it. The 1st reference is in French (which I can't read, but used Google Translate) but appears to be about John Thorne who died with Richard Whiting (abbot) on Glastonbury Tor in 1539 - but I can't see how this gives the name Arthur. The second reference gives info about Richard Whiting (abbot). The 3rd ref seems to be about the name "Arthur" but does mention Arthur being a martyr of the 16th century. I would suggest the article is renamed to John Thorne (martyr) or similar, expanded and clarified or deleted.— Rod talk 11:24, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can we improve or delete this article 

message: I found very few sources in English about him.
Most probable thing is Arthur of Glastonbury is Jean Thorne (Arthur is his name in religion). He's blessed by the Catholic Church, not Saint. I don't know how to change the title of the article.
I don't think the Roman Church has a Saint Arthur. I only heard of 2 blessed: him and Arthur Bell (Francis as his name in religion). I also found reference to an Arthur of Ireland (12th century) in Spanish but didn't have time to check it.
Sources: http://archive.org/stream/menologyofenglan00stanrich#page/540/mode/2up (EN)
http://nominis.cef.fr/contenus/saint/9156/Bienheureux-Jean-Thorne.html (FR)
http://www.elalmanaque.com/santoral/septiembre/1-9-arturo.htm (ES)
— Fombelle (talk) 15:47, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Insights
Talk:Michael Burleigh

message: Is this Michael Burleigh also the columnist for the Daily Mail? tharsaile (talk) 16:45, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Daily Mail Columnist? 

message: This statement of John Gray's -- quoted in order to criticize Michael Burleigh -- is surely incorrect? :-
"... there is nothing peculiarly Islamic about suicide bombing, which was first developed by the Tamil Tigers..."
The Tamil Tigers first used suicide bombing in 1987 -- see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vallipuram_Vasanthan . It had already been used several years earlier by Shi'ite Muslim groups in the Lebanon. A number of suicide bombings occurred in the latter country in the period 1981-1983, and they appear to have been the first such in modern times -- see, for example, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1983_Beirut_barracks_bombing . So it is highly likely that the Tamil Tigers, beginning in 1987, _copied_ those tactics.
Davidpringle (talk) 18:43, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The quote was very long, and seemingly incorrect so have removed it.
Rsloch (talk) 18:51, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Have you forgotten Japanese suicide bombing in 1945? Keith-264 (talk) 19:07, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Gray Quote
Talk:Walland, Tennessee

message: In the history section, it says that Miller's Cove baptist Church is the oldest congregation in Blount County.  But New Providence in Maryville was established inside Fort Craig before 1796 and has never ceased to exist as a congregation. What gives?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.242.185.11 (talk) 19:47, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Inez Burns' History of Blount County (pp. 118-9) is the source for that.  I'm not sure what she means by "oldest congregation."  Do you have a source for New Providence?  Bms4880 (talk) 20:03, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Miller's Cove Baptist Church 

message: Comment moved from Wikipedia talk:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point by Orlady (talk) 02:42, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Josias Gamble did not start a fort in Walland in 1790, He began a fort on the little river in 1792 just below davis ford and the ellejoy creek. I grew up at the location of the fort. I have contacted the state of Tennessee about the marker that they placed at walland and have sent them the deed showing where the fort was. They have aknowledged the mistake and the marker will be moved to the correct location.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rssimerly (talk • contribs) 02:26, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've checked two sources, one of which places the fort on or very near the Great Indian Warpath (which was on the other side of Chilhowee Mtn.) and another placing a "Ft. Gamble" on Ellejoy.  So it appears the historical commission did indeed miss it by about 10-15 miles.  The deletion is appropriate.  Bms4880 (talk) 13:34, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fort
Talk:Foothills Parkway

message: The article states that one of the termini selected in 1944 was I-40. The Interstate system wasn't created until 1956. Mapsax (talk) 17:03, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Authorization inconsistency 

message: Signs on the part of US 441 (Great Smoky Mountains Parkway) between Gatlinburg and Pigeon Forge say Foothills Parkway:  I don't see anything on the Gatlinburg Bypass. --NE2 12:45, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Also US 441?
Talk:Hafford, Saskatchewan/to do

message: *History
**major historical events that occurred in community
*Law and government
** Mayor or City Executive-- current, previous executives
** representative body?
*Geography
** Physical geography (area, unique features)
** Major Parks
** Transportation
*** Roads and bridges
*** Railways
***Airports
***Transit
*Economy
** Major industries/products
** taxes
** Shopping Centres
*Demographics
** city population
** racial/ethnic makeup
** religious makeup
*Sites of interest
*Education
** Public
** Private
** Colleges and universities
*Sports teams
*Local media
**Newspapers
**Radio stations
**Television stations
*Notable natives
*(Miscellaneous topics and similar lists)
*External links
*References cite sources
SriMesh | talk 18:52, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: SECTIONS
Talk:The Boot, Cromer Street

message: What about the boot in New Orleans? Can we make a page for that? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.20.10.153 (talk • contribs) 18:51, November 25, 2007
:Sure, if you think it's notable enough. Create the page at The Boot (New Orleans) by clicking on that red link. — alex.muller (talk • edits) 02:44, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Roan Mountain (Roan Highlands)

message: These are excellent photographs.  If you can, add a brief description of each at the bottom.  Bms4880 (talk) 12:59, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image Gallery

message: Apparently, there is a browser issue.  I checked the article's previous layout using two different computers and both IE and Firefox.  The only time I found a gap was when the text size on either was changed to "small".  The gap was being caused by the photographs aligned below the infobox pushing the photos under the "peaks" section downward.  Eleutheromartin's edits were placing 4 photos bunched at the top, 4 more bunched in the links and references section, with large stretches of text lacking a corresponding photograph.  
I changed the size of all photos in the body (with the exception of the one at the top, which is pre-set) to 200px, and reduced the number of photos immediately under the infobox to two.  Let me know if there are still gaps.
The photographs were placed, for the most part, to match section content, with aesthetics being secondary.  The photograph showing the AT crossing Round Bald was placed near the top because it showed Round Bald, Jane Bald, and Grassy Ridge Bald as well as the A.T.  Bms4880 (talk) 16:16, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem.  Great photographs!  Bms4880 (talk) 02:48, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Images
Talk:Robina

message: don't change back... my (beep) friend allways try to make my account and "Robina" in the same articel...
ps: i have changed account...(fiskegalen92 now...the account he try to change is fiskegalen28)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fiskegalen92 (talk • contribs) 19:03, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Kargilik County

message: *Merge. The official romanization of this county's name is Kargilik. Therefore Yecheng should be merged to here. --Neo-Jay (talk) 18:56, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *I agree with Nat Krause - if any moving is to be done, I think his suggestion of moving Yecheng to Kargilik or Karghilik is the best answer (with appropriate redirects, of course). Cheers, John Hill (talk) 10:13, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: merge [[Yecheng]]
Talk:Triodion

message: --Lksedor (talk) 03:32, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Hello, and thanks for the page. I dont see any date on this page, and don't have the information either. Do we know when it was set in motion, who wrote it, and an idea of it spread in history ? Thanks a lot.
RigOLuche (talk) 01:49, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: datation
Talk:Autocephalous Turkish Orthodox Patriarchate

message: Please could someone update the members count
:That would require a reliable source giving a current membership figure. Do you know of one? Huon (talk) 23:33, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help request
Talk:Chuck Evans (American football)

message: I just heard on WNST in Baltimore that Chuck Evans has passed away, and have updated the articel as such. Wildthing61476 (talk) 15:58, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Passed Away 

message: Chuck was in the Marine corps I think he want to be remembered for that 47.196.12.152 (talk) 14:28, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Military service missing
Talk:Shotgun argumentation

message: Why do you want to delete it?
It's a term used in on-line debating. 
Here is a source:
http://warp.povusers.org/grrr/conspiracytheories.html
I'm not sure what the other objection means, if this is not a valid subject, then there are loads of other informal fallacies that are not valid subjects also. Therefore I have removed the deletion-thing.
– I rewrote some parts of the article to clear it up a little. I also added a category and removed the uncategorised tag. Deleet (talk) 04:44, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Delete
Talk:Xerophagy

message: Does this mean "some historic organizations and some modern military ones"?  Because the rest of the sentence refers to monks, not soldiers.--Richardson mcphillips (talk) 13:38, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:   "historic and modern military organizations" 

message: "dry food, especially food cooked without oil"  Given that food cooked in water is allowed, is "especially" the right word?  Shouldn't it be "specifically"? --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 13:40, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "especially"?
Talk:List of medical schools in Canada

message: The link for "Université de Montréal - Faculté de Médecine" redirects to Université de Laval!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.156.40.28 (talk) 00:04, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong link! 

message: is there any medical college in canada which gives admission at 80 percent.i want to all detail about such college  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.186.48.43 (talk) 08:29, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  is there any medical college in canada which gives admission at 80 percent 
Talk:Wehrmachtbericht

message: I'm not sure what a 'private war correspondent' is in the context of Wehrmacht. Can someone clarify? Otherwise, I'd like to delete this statement as it's unclear: "...while private war correspondents were not admitted." --K.e.coffman (talk) 06:26, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I will go ahead and remove shortly. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:06, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Private war correspondents 

message: I was approached by various editors to address the omission of the concept of the "named reference in the Wehrmachtbericht" as a military award. As the article in its previous state had failed WP:GACR criterion 3, it is not broad in coverage. The concept of the award characteristic of the "named reference in the Wehrmachtbericht" is based on Felix Römer (see German Historical Institute London stated in his book Kameraden. Die Wehrmacht von innen. Note, I will not be available to comment on possible discussions for at least 4 weeks. Cheers MisterBee1966 (talk) 08:50, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Note: Moved comment here from GA review page. This is the correct venue; the GA review has been completed. Vanamonde (talk) 08:56, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Named reference in the ''Wehrmachtbericht''

message: A now-banned POV-pushing bully IP attempted to make an assertion that the Wehrmachtbericht was a reliable source in a discussion-turned-argument on a "panzer ace" talk page, and edited this article to lend credibility to that perspective. the sources they brought up, however, could possibly be included if presented in the appropriate context as a view coming from inside the propaganda machine. Here they are, sloppily copied over from their edit:
 Mewnst (talk) 10:17, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources brought forward for West German/former Wehrmachtbericht perspective
Talk:Substructure (mathematics)

message: Substructure and submodel are different enough ideas in model theory that conflating them will mislead people about key ideas of the field, particularly the meaning of "theory" and "language".  Take the theory of fields in the language of rings, for example (with symbols for 1, 0, binary addition, unary negation, and binary multiplication).  A field may have subrings that are not subfields (the rationals have the integers as a subring) - these are substructures without being submodels.  
The conditions to make a subtructure are weaker than those of a submodel, because substructures can violate existential axioms of the theory:  substructures can be found inside models by just specifing some of the elements the structure contains, and then closing under whatever functions are in the language - but they aren't necessarily models of the given theory themselves, because they could be missing elements required by the theory, but not supplied by functions in the language (again, consider the ring of integers within the field of rationals).  If you want all your substructures to be submodels, you have to tune the language for that purpose.Isotropy 22:44, 30 July 2006
:I agree, although in practice I have never seen any confusion caused by this. I think these subtle points are best explained by covering both notions within one article. Therefore I am merging the "submodel" stub into "substructure" stub and extending both.--Hans Adler (talk) 19:09, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rescued comment from the talk page of submodel 

message: substurcture is anything below a sturcture — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.4.193.161 (talk) 
:Not in this article. This is an article about mathematics. There is a very clear pointer to the article superstructure for the discussion of substructures in an engineering context. Hans Adler 17:26, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Scope of this article

message: In the submodel section, it is stated that "...the even numbers (2Z, +, 0) form a submodel which is (a group but) not a subgroup...".
Shouldn't the even numbers form a subgroup of the integers?
--Shay Falador (talk) 06:10, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  (2Z,+,0) example
Talk:Steve French (singer)

message: Steve French was not a "founding member" of The Kingdom Heirs as this article states. He joined The Kingdom Heirs in 1982, eleven years after the group was founded. This is clearly documented by the fact that several albums were released by the group during the 1970s before French ever appeared on a cover image.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.112.160.50 (talk) 18:41, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the claim. http://www.sghistory.com/index.php?n=S.Steve_French made it clear he joined the group. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:14, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Founding member
Talk:Undone (radio series)

message: Sounds intriguing - in a "Neverwhere"/Douglas Adams kind of way.
Is it available as a CD or in Podcast format? (Source?)
203.56.94.25 (talk) 05:59, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think it is. ISD (talk) 06:05, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Availability?
Talk:Kaliv (Hasidic dynasty)

message: In the History section, I don't understand the word choice of "Jewish" in this phrase: "Often he adapted Hungarian folk songs, adding Jewish words."  'Jewish' isn't a language - Hebrew or Yiddish, maybe?  Or is it that he addded Jewish themes to these songs in Hungarian (or Hebrew, or Yiddish)?--134.192.8.10 (talk) 16:46, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

message: This article needs to cite its sources. For instance, I'm interested by the similarity of the lines below to the article by Joseph Horowitz posted at http://www.budowitz.com/Budowitz/Essays_files/Klezmer%20and%20Tanchaz.pdf:
*Horowitz: "Rabbi Yitzchak Isaac Taub ... was known as the "Sweet Singer of Israel (1744-1828). He composed many popular Hasidic melodies and often adapted Hungarian folk songs by substituting Jewish words for Hungarian ones.... He taught that the tunes he heard were really from the Holy Temple in Jerusalem, and had been lost among the nations over the years until he found them and returned them to the Jewish people. He supported this claim by asserting that the Gentiles who taught him the songs soon forgot them as soon as the Rabbi learned them." (66)
*Present article: "Rabbi Isaac grew to be a great rebbe and was known as "the Sweet Singer of Israel". He composed many popular Hasidic melodies. Often he adapted Hungarian folk songs, adding Jewish words. He taught that the tunes he heard were really from the Holy Temple in Jerusalem, and were lost among the nations over the years, and he found them and returned them to the Jewish people. He said that the proof that it was true was that the gentile who would teach him the song would forget it as soon as the rebbe learned it."
It sounds like this article is paraphrasing Horowitz, but if it's possible they're both drawing from a common source I'd very much like to find it. —AbdiViklas (talk) 05:29, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:New Jersey Republican Party

message: I will be removing the 'position' infobox. It is unsourced as well as includes a very generalized, not agreed-upon, and cursory overview of the party. In addition, the main articles for the Republican and Democratic parties purposely do not include this infobox in order to limit POV pushing. Norge17maii (talk) 21:37, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Position' Infobox 

message: This article is little more than a list of every elected Republican to a national office from New Jersey, and has very little to say about the actual New Jersey Republican Party. Scu ba (talk) 02:32, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scope of article