Talk:In Flames/Archive 1

message: A good stub was replaced with copyvio-content. The latest good version is . ✏ Sverdrup 09:15, 5 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I've created a new stub for "In Flames".  It doesn't have much in the way of a biography, but I've added the band's complete discography. Nyght 17:51, 5 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: As I noted above, I think we can use the latest good version. I just don't know how to delete the copyvio edits and retain the attribution to the latest good version. ✏ Sverdrup 10:24, 6 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Wonderful, and in depth article, but! I think 1) the discussion about who influenced who should be left out, it doesn't matter, it's all good. And, 2) I'm not just saying this because I really like the band, but doesn't the article contain too much discussion on whether the band have sold out with this or that album. Perhaps shorten it, and instead keep, and perhaps even expand the sections on what the band actually did differently with their music on the different albums. Oh yeah, and generally I'm not too fond of labelling the different genres of metal, and it's not just because I don't quite understand the distinctions  :-)Hepors 16:58, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In the first paragraph it is written: "During the years changed and evolved their style through many influences, especially in the last years." This sentence doesn't make sense but I don't even know the band so I can't edit it to make it look right. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tomtheebomb (talk • contribs) 08:25, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article content

message: Some idiot with nothing better to do has vandalized this page. He/she has change the genre name of In Flames from Melodic Death Metal to Nu Romantic Pop. I've tried to clean it up as best as possible but I believe the main contributors to this article will be more qualified then I. Please please help me sort out this mess and give In Flames an article they deserve!!!—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.36.175.120 (talk • contribs).
:i did what i could to fix all the vandalization.  someone thinks they are a metal god and can totally discredit this band.  get off your high horse and show some respect.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Goldplatypus (talk • contribs).
::someone has vandalized this page again?!—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Iambob (talk • contribs).
:::Please disallow editing this page for a while, as there has been constant vandalism.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.3.149.9  (talk • contribs).
::::He's done it again. I think this article should be saved and merged with "idiotic behaviour." The hilarious thing is, this guy, seems to think he knows about metal, when he believes that In Flames don't deserve to share a stage with Slipknot. Other way round dude, and that can be argued without resorting to puerile homosexual slurs.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.152.205.35 (talk • contribs).
Ok who ever said this above is right, editing should be disallowed and the article should be restored to the original...—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kalva (talk • contribs).
:Yes, once again the same vandalist has taken time out of his or her busy schedule to attack this page. Obviously someone has a great dislike for the band In Flames. I've just changed everything back. This user 86.15.4.242 should be blocked or something. I don't know how to do it, so if someone knows how to do it, please permanently block them. All they keep doing is attacking the In Flames page. In Flames is Melodic Death metal. So stop calling them nu-romantic pop, which isn't even a genre. Changing all the albums' names is petty and a waste of time. Why the hell are you bothering to vandalise anyway? There's a lot of people who will just change it back. I'm guessing you have a lot of time on your hand Once again it's 86.15.4.242 In Flames 19:04, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll do it--Childzy (Talk|Contribs) 20:46, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm seeing a bunch of missing album covers in the discography. What's happened? Gwrtheyrn 02:12, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fix the Vandalization, then Lock it. I'm tired of coming to this page to find that all of the albums cannot be selected because some childish impotent no-name with an intellectual age of 3 had to go and pass around his bullshit worthless slanderous edit. t(o.ot)—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.13.58.211 (talk • contribs).
This article should be locked so that only people registered to wikipedia can edit it --Dexter prog 17:48, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

text: more vandalism at this page i guess. the only thing it says is "SUCKY BAND". please please, PLEASE, someone make this stop. 151.198.144.171 15:48, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism

message: didnt in flames have an old singer?  He was on all their past tours and was in the cloud connected and only for the weak videos.  where did he go and what is his name?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.87.143.239 (talk • contribs).
:On their first album the singer was the guy from Dark Tranquility—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.106.162.98 (talk • contribs).
::Mikael Stanne wasn't ever part of the band but he was a session vocalist for In Flames.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.196.173.51 (talk • contribs).
:::hey the vocalist in only for the weak video is anders himself without the beard and dreadlocks. bruce59.95.21.167 09:59, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Old singer

message: This article already has all of the band's chart positions in the U.S.  But what about chart positions in their home country, Sweden?  Personally I found it intersting that "Come Clarity" debuted at #1 . —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.238.170.154 (talk) 22:01, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Whoever is adding all those chart positions better start providing a source for them cause that unsourced tag at the top of the article makes the article look bad.--Leon Sword 02:35, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Chart positions

message: Anyone else think that all of In Flames' discography should move to a seperate page? After all, there are 12 releases, and the page looks cluttered.  Dmiles21 01:24, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I am currently in the process of doing a complete rewrite of the In Flames article and included will be a revamped discography. If you see that the finished product still remains too cluttered, by all means start a seperate discography page, but please wait for the complete rewrite to make the decision. I will be done with the rewrite within 5 days or sooner (it's currently delayed), searching for good sources is what's slowing me down. --Leon Sword 01:48, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discography