Talk:Big Love

message: FYI I uploaded a family tree created using Visio at http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Big_love_familytree.jpg . 
I'm new to Wikipedia, rather than trying to edit the page thought I'd just alert the primary author of the page. 
Shan22303 (talk) 00:41, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Graphical Family Tree 

message: The WikiProject Television list this article as being a Start-Class article of Low Importance. This may have been true when the article was first started, but I suggest this should be updated. The article seems to be relatively well written with a lot of information about the show and several citations. The show itself is controversial ( http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=102119413 ) ( http://www.deseretnews.com/article/1,5143,705289746,00.html ), noteworthy ( http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=99136553 ) ( http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5254017 ), and entertaining ( http://www.eonline.com/uberblog/watch_with_kristin/b82445_big_love_season_four_go.html ). AJseagull1 (talk) 04:20, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Television: Start-Class and Low importance? 

message: Roman Grant is a very tricky man, and we've thought him a goner at least twice before.  Can we really call him deceased just because he was strangled at the end of the season finale?  I think in the least, there should be a footnote noting that it's possible he's alive. --Crushti (talk) 15:08, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Since there's no discussion, I'm removing that he is deceased. If you feel strongly enough that he should be counted as deceased, please discuss it.  Also, I suspect that next week we will know whether he is deceased or not. --Crushti (talk) 04:43, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Roman is now conclusively established as deceased, of course.  End of that discussion! -Etoile (talk) 04:17, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roman Grant deceased? 

message: Family tree needs to have the following added:  Ted Price, Barb's brother-in-law (married to Cindy); Ned Johanssen, Barb's step-father (married to Nancy).  I would do it, but don't know how to add people to this type of tree, so someone with knowledge of how this type of tree works here will have to give it a go.  Thanks!  --SkagitRiverQueen (talk) 19:28, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, and it would be nice to have an explanation of the colors as well! -Etoile (talk) 04:19, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update Family Tree 

message: Why was the change to the number of episodes undone?
There are 43 episodes in total now (see the episode list), 12 each in seasons 1 & 2, 10 in season 3 and 9 in season 4, 12+12+10+9=43.  The page is showing as only 40 episodes total which is wrong.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.74.14.139 (talk) 12:56, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Part of the problem is that you are editing as an IP address and not a registered user.  The other part of the problem is that you changed the number of episodes without a notation as to why in the edit summary.  Another thing is that you provided no reference with the change.  All of the above looks to me (and probably others) like possible vandalism of the article.  It's a good idea - if you plan to stay a while editing in Wikipedia - to register yourself on WP with a username.  When you do so, other editors will take you more seriously.  Another good idea is for you to put something in the edit summary that briefly explains why you made the change/edit you did (or a brief synopsis of what the edit was).  If you have a reference to include that states there were 43, not 40, episodes - it would be good to include that, too.  Then, the info you change/provide is verifiable and will likely not be changed again or challenged.  Thanks.  --SkagitRiverQueen (talk) 04:15, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia is meant to be edited by anyone. The tone of your response, from my perspective, to this user is rude and "very Lucy van Pelt", and I encourage you from this point on to come across as a coach and suggest, with method and example, how to amend the statement to a "particular standard" instead of taking about the negative approach. My advice is based on my opinion of reading both statements and coming to a conclusion. And that's all it is. As far as the information presented was changed . . . the change was correct and all a Wikipedian or guest user needed to do was the simple math equation presented and come to the same conclusion. I encourage nobody to go to an extreme as you have suggested. Such a method doesn't work and will chase away people from editing articles in general at Wikipedia. Again, my advice based from my own opinion is to be a coach and lead by method and example and to not be "Lucy van Pelt" about it. Sierraoffline444 (talk) 06:03, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

text: Motion seconded. Apple8800 (talk) 23:47, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of episode 

message: : The following was originally posted to From Talk:Big Love/Comments, but should have been added here instead, so moved. Could not put in approximate chronological order, as that time-period for this talk page has already been archived. -- 208.81.184.4 (talk) 16:27, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It would have been nice for the commenter to be a little more specific.  POV in what manner?  Favorably in regard to the LDS Church or unfavorably?  The section is specifically about the negative response from the LDS Church and directly quotes their position.  I really don't see how it can get more NPOV since it's the LDS Church that's being quoted. Lhb1239 (talk) 17:26, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  From Talk:Big Love/Comments 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Big Love. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061020112140/http://blogs.sltrib.com/plurallife/2006/03/real-sources-behind-big-love.htm to http://blogs.sltrib.com/plurallife/2006/03/real-sources-behind-big-love.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:34, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Big Love. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://ausiellofiles.ew.com/2010/07/19/gregory-itzin-joins-big-love/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110129161221/http://www.tvfanatic.com/tags/big-love/casting-news/ to http://www.tvfanatic.com/tags/big-love/casting-news/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100111005638/http://community.post-gazette.com/blogs/tunedin/archive/2010/01/07/big-love-big-disappointment.aspx to http://community.post-gazette.com/blogs/tunedin/archive/2010/01/07/big-love-big-disappointment.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:57, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hi.  I noticed that there are a couple of needed additions to the ancestry chart for the Henrickson children.  In the finale, Sarah and Scott have a child, named after Sarah's father, William Orville.  William Orville Quittman should be added there.  Also seen in the finale is Heather Tuttle who is now married to Ben Henrickson.  I am unable to figure out how to add these to the chart as it appears complicated and out of my abilities.  Hopefully someone who watches and edits this page can make the change.  Thank you.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alaska4Me2 (talk • contribs) 19:24, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needed additions to ancestry chart