Talk:South of Market, San Francisco

message: Should the picture with the product placement be in here?
I added it because it is representative of the slightly seedy business that characterize the area - I actually photographed a bunch of them but this one came out the best. Pretzelpaws 23:05, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What special relationship does union square have to soma?  More so than any other nearby neighborhood? Mike Linksvayer 06:21, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I just took it out.Zyxwv99 (talk) 14:47, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

text: It was probably there because the City Shopping Center / Westfield Mall could be considered part of the Union Square shopping district (in the broadest sense), i.e., the shopping district forms an arc around the base of Nob Hill, making a quarter of a circle from Powell St. to California St., and is much wider at Powell St., thus including a bit of the south side of Market St.Zyxwv99 (talk) 23:30, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why see also union square? 

message: Why doesn't the demographics section have any info on demographic info? Toddst1 (talk) 06:16, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Demographics? 

message: I disagree about the definition of where SOMA (which is how everyone writes it) is; Cesar Chavez is definitely not one of the borders, it's too far south. If you go south enough you start going into Mission, Potrero Hill, and Dog Patch (depending which direction). Townsend and Market are correct, but there is no mention of a Northeast border which would make SOMA run into South Beach. Sorry the SF Chronicle is wrong, perhaps they should look at map! My authority on the subject, I live in SOMA. (Lime124 (talk) 15:46, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: My take on the boundaries of SOMA are 3rd & Market -> follow Market to -> South Van Ness, follow to -> Central Freeway /US101, follow to 16th Street, Follow to 3rd Street, and back to Market. --67.101.112.78 (talk) 00:17, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Where is SOMA?

message: The population figures cited only account for roughly half the area (as defined in this article) of South of Market. Either the boundaries are too wide in this article or the population statistics are too small.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Usaar33 (talk • contribs) 01:38, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Population Wrong

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on South of Market, San Francisco. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110505194313/http://www.sf-planning.org/ftp/general_plan/Rincon_Hill.htm to http://www.sf-planning.org/ftp/general_plan/Rincon_Hill.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140424234355/http://sfist.com/2014/04/22/linkedin_plans_to_lease_entire_26-s.php to http://sfist.com/2014/04/22/linkedin_plans_to_lease_entire_26-s.php
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160516051820/http://sfist.com/2015/07/23/the_dirty_30-year_history_of_the_up.php to http://sfist.com/2015/07/23/the_dirty_30-year_history_of_the_up.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:23, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Is it me or did they leave out Black people from this section?
WillieHowardCO67 (talk) 17:34, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: You are correct; the section is old and misleading, and the citation link does not work, so I deleted the whole thing. Any editor who wants to develop a new section can certainly do so. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 05:02, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Demographics