lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Savage Sam (film)

message: It doesn't even say if Savage Sam is a dog or what! I still don't know!--Santahul 14:21, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Badly designed article 

message: I haven't read the book Savage Sam, but I have read Old Yeller and he (Yeller) is described a stocky, lop-eared 'yeller' dog. I don't understand how he is expected to produce a hound dog pup. Additionally, the dog who played Old Yeller in the 1957 film (his name was Spike) was a big, lop-eared, yellow Lab/Mastiff mix and the acting dog who played Miss Priss (Lisbeth's dog) was a short, wiry black-and-white mongrel. What's more than that, Old Yeller's son is featured in the movie, Old Yeller, as the pup given to Arliss and Travis as a gift from Lisbeth. The pup is yellow, and in the end credits, he is still yellow (as he well should be). So, really, crediting Savage Sam with being Old Yeller's son (especially when the idea isn't even touched on in either movie) is quite inaccurate. Just sayin'. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mistvieh (talk • contribs) 09:40, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That's the way it was in both novels, though.  I don't recall a description of Savage Sam in the book, but I know his mother was a blue-tick hound (and I'm unfamiliar with what all that entails).  I know he wasn't supposed to look much like Old Yeller, but he was like him in some of his personality traits.76.6.217.8 (talk) 17:43, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Savage Sam cannot possibly be Old Yeller's son.
Talk:List of political parties in Oregon

message: Ashland, Oregon since 2004. Website: American Patriot Party .CC  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:5B0:292C:E620:3CF7:D237:F5C0:89DA (talk) 00:00, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  American Patriot Party 
Talk:List of Ontario general elections

message: What do people think of re-formatting this page so that it more along the lines of List of Newfoundland and Labrador general elections? Tompw (talk) 00:49, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change of layout? 
Talk:Uri Zohar

message: Gilabrand, I understand why you keep changing things back. But I can see you have a connection to Judaism and are probably jewish yourself, and we are told not to bring up a Baal teshuvah's past. Obviously we don't need to remove all of it, he freely admits to much of it, but at least the more embarassing things. 173.63.51.250 (talk) 15:09, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Past Infractions

message: Most of the other language editions, especially the Hebrew article, have far more details. Perhaps some  of them should be included in the English article. Mcljlm (talk) 00:33, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion
Talk:Jan Fennell

message: I altered a recent edit because it imputes improper motives to those who disagree with Fennell's methods.  This is a contentious statement and would need proof, and citations, to back it up. I've also put a "citation needed" tag on my own statement - that many dog owners and trainers feel the method is anything but psychologically cruel - as I'm not satisfied with the sources I can find in support.  They are web and not print-based. Anyone who can come up with a print-based ref, please cite it.RLamb (talk) 11:15, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Dispute over Amichien methods
Talk:Republic of Mountainous Armenia

message: Please, provide references, this isn't a sandbox for OR. Atabəy (talk) 07:34, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have to agree, without any sources to cite the article give the impression that this is merely propaganda. RetlawSnellac (talk) 20:33, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: After reading the article which states the republic was founded in 1918 and dissolved in 1918, I started searching and found these statements;
* "with the ephemeral "Republic of Mountainous Armenia" (April-July 1921) -- The Armenian Review, p196
* On 25 December 1920, Zangeaur declared itself independent. After the Dashnak uprising, which seized Yerevan on 18 February 1921, was crushed on 2 April, Zangezur was, for several months, the last bastion of anti-Bolshevism. There Nzhdeh proclaimed the 'Independent Republic of Mountainous Armenia'. It was crushed in July with the aid of Red Army detachments from Karabagh. -- The Caucasian Knot, p133-134
* Led by Garegin Nzhdeh, partisan unit resisted Sovietisation until their defeat by the Red Army became inevitable. In fact they declared Zangezur as the independent Republic of Mountainous Armenia on 27 April 1921. -- The Armenians, p259
--Kansas Bear (talk) 18:37, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct Information 

message: The article features an Armenian flag. Did RMA have its own one? Brandmeister[t] 13:46, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flag 

message: The article includes lots of statements with no citations, even the first sentences in introduction are not cited. Therefore I put citation needed template.  Anastasia Bukhantseva  09:51, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations needed 

message: Edit history seems to show quite a few attemps by Azerbaijani users to "fix" history to fit the narrative of their authoritarian government.  
Ex: "Qarabagli..." (now deleted account) made a now reverted edit calling the Iranian city of Tabriz Azerbaijani.  Though this city has a population of Iranian Azeris, he quietly made it seem like the city was under control of the Republic of Azerbaijan.
Another edit claimed that Nzhdeh's expulsions of Azeri muslims comprised the majority of Zangezur's population.  Mountainous Karabakh and Syunik had an Azeri minority until the Soviet era, when most of the Azeri population was expelled, not a 3/5 majority, and I could find no non-Azeri government sources claiming this figure. Dsobol0513 (talk) 03:22, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Azeri Vandalism/Bias
Talk:Narcissus papyraceus

message: Since Paperwhite is a kind of Narcissus, would it make more sense to merge this page into Narcissus (genus)? Llwang 21:56, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge 

message: There is a common problem with growing paperwhite bulbs indoors: they grow too tall and fall over. In recent years there is a common recommendation to stunt the growth by watering with a solution of up to 10% alcohol. Perhaps this should be mentioned in the article.-71.174.190.122 (talk) 15:59, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  alcohol used to stunt growth 

message: * "Narcissus papyraceus, one of a few species known as paperwhite..."
Please include a list of the paperwhite species.
The article Narcissus (plant) has good content about "'Paperwhite form", but is vague about specifics.-71.174.190.122 (talk) 16:10, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  paperwhite species
Talk:Oregon Catholic Press

message: This seems to be an advertisement for a business, albeit a non-profit one, that serves no real purpose other than to provide some music for religious services. Has it been involved in any newsworthy events (besides publishing music later used for high-profile funerals)? If not, perhaps it should be deleted. 69.42.7.212 (talk) 01:39, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delete?
Talk:Douglas Dam

message: This article badly needs a picture, but I did not have one.
The specific values mentioned about the lake size could be verified and updated as necessary.
I could not find any annual power production numbers, but TVA should have them available to inquiry. Sdenny123 21:58, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggested Enhancements to article
Talk:Afraid (Mötley Crüe song)

message: :Image:AfraidMC.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 02:55, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:AfraidMC.jpg
Talk:ZoomTown

message: Added "inappropriate tone" flag - this reads like a combination of advertising and a disgruntled tech support person... frankh 22:18, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I guess I'm the one who wrote most of the article, and I'm frankly dumbfounded by your assessment of the article. With just four sentences of basic information, I'm not sure how I can make it sound less "disgruntled", but I've tried. Feel free to fix it up further. – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 20:07, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Centennial Campus of North Carolina State University

message: Image added per request. Contact me directly if another (or different) image is needed. Cgb628 (talk) 01:05, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:My Big Fat Independent Movie

message: * I have removed and edited out a fair amount of vandalism and slant on this article today.  Be on the look out for vandal edits, though they may be sporadic and erratic.  Interestingly, even one of the reviews of the movie cites online abuse by some haters of someone involved in the movie.  Since the issue has been recognized, this problem can be solved by requiring citations of material added or modified.  And I have never heard of Chris Gore before today, I thought he was Al Gore's son rebelling against Tipper's overbearing censorship-happy mothering style.--Milowent (talk) 21:18, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: Okay, I got a msg from a hater of this film (ghris core) asking me to help him edit this page. I won't do that. But I do think that this page does need to be balanced out. I'm in no way going to take sides here. This page, and other page (the filmmaker) have been viciously attacked. I won't stand for that. But I think the reaction was to go too far the other way. I don't blame the opposing editor. So I tried to maintain his/her edits while balancing them out. I'm going to use other similar pages and wikipedia standards as the litmus test here. Please don't revert my edits out of bad faith. I've used sources that will back up the changes made. If I had to pick a side then I choose wikipedia. Before reverting my changes please discuss on talk page. Both pages read better now. I'm at a coffee shop so I can't sign in for whatever reason. I will fix later with my account so that my anon status will not be confused as a sock or a meat. Sry for the confusion. Happy editing.12.23.116.10 (talk) 20:19, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: If you are gonna talk crap bout me behind my back, include me in the convo, will ya? Whateve... fine, the changes are fine. Please dont delete my MINOR fixes. Lates'Ghriscore (talk) 15:25, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: A Big Fat Mess
Talk:Petare

message: I don't supposed so:
"The city was founded in 1319". Before Columbus (1492)? Huh?
Skyforgerquestions? 22:31, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. MER-C 09:46, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:International Nurses Day

message: Hi, Rod, is that better?  The last two need to be converted to same style but I don't have time right now. -THB 22:30, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Refs

message: Hi, Rod, I'm not sure that the pic of Westminster Abbey actually illustrates International Nurses Day.  -THB 16:19, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Pic of Westminster Abbey

message: As part of a review of all nursing wikiproject articles, I have changed this article's importance to low per Wikipedia:WikiProject Nursing/Assessment#Importance scale.  I have also added start class. If you disagree, please leave a note here so we can discuss it.  Cheers, Basie (talk) 01:38, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:NURSE]] priority review

message: I removed the part about Fry, as reading sources there were "A list of ten suggested role models - which Nurse Wheeler said 'were not just white, middle-class Protestants'" - singling out Fry seems pointless. Also removed the generalising form one vote to something more general. Rich Farmbrough, 09:48, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Fry
Talk:Střezislava

message: This article states it as a fact that she was the daughter of Vratislaus I of Bohemia and member of the Premyslid dynasty. In reality the kinship of Slavnik's wife Strezislava to the Premyslids has been never proved and is seen as questionable by historians. Though the information stated in this article might seem "cool stuff", it is actualy just a speculation.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sapphire1000 (talk • contribs) 22:12, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  questionable Premyslid kinship
Talk:Zen v

message: Hey I just made this page and I'm not realy sure if I did it right. Oh and this wierd your page is an advertisement thing showed up. Thanks :) BrianEd 22:36, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That means that someone thinks it reads like an advertisement rather than an encyclopedia article :). Ideally you should find a similar comment from an external review that you can cite rather than saying it yourself, as it's more of a personal opinion and original research. Mark Grant 23:43, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

text: Hi!  I added that advertisement notice box.  I wanted to let you know that that section reads like an ad, which doesn't quite fit in with Wikipedia's function as an encyclopedia, so that you could edit it.  I figured that was more polite than just editing it myself while you were still working on the page.  :)  LastChanceToBe 23:45, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Belgorod Oblast

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Mkativerata (talk) 21:15, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem 

message: This section is clearly incomplete:  the Culture section says that the area was "one of the earliest Rus' principalities", yet this does not appear in the History section.  The history needs to include that as well as information about the early Slavic tribes.
Dismalscholar (talk) 22:57, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: a part of this oblast is no longer under the control of the central government, it should be noted 2A02:3030:809:C0BF:1:0:1CFA:FC04 (talk) 20:58, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The situation is unclear, there is no confirmation of what areas have been taken. Mellk (talk) 21:02, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Here is a very reputable source confirming that Kozinka is occupied by Ukraine-alligned partisans: https://www.understandingwar.org/backgrounder/russian-offensive-campaign-assessment-may-22-2023 2A02:3030:809:C0BF:1:0:1CFA:FC04 (talk) 08:28, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, that appears to be confirmed. HappyWith (talk) 12:09, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it is time to add the term "contested". 2A02:3030:81D:AF74:1:0:20A8:12D8 (talk) 13:16, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

text: eventually we might need a new article about Belgorod People's Republic UserWiki00 (talk) 06:29, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The region is contested
Talk:Vitamin/Archive 2

message: "Pangamic acid, vitamin B15; the related substance dimethylglycine is quite wrongly referred to as vitamin B15 but also labeled B16." Which is the pseudovit? --Gbleem 17:53, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Psuedo

message: Catalysts need not remain unchanged - as long as the molecule is regenerated by the end of the reaction, it is still considered a catalyst. Someone might want to see if they can work this in in a concise manner - I'm reluctant to add anything, since this article looks messy enough as it is...  --203.206.183.160 14:10, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Catalysts

message: I have reorganized and cleaned up this article in an attempt to improve the flow of information, and to facilitate the introduction of some examples of the function and importance of vitamins. I have also removed some POV wording, and some information that did not seem to be relevant to the article. I hope that the article has been improved.--DO11.10 20:22, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You may suggest it, but I recommend you stop actually blanking the article, since this is likely to get you blocked from Wikipedia. If you remove information you need to give a detailed account in the edit summary, point by point. Notinasnaid 13:11, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reorganization and clean up  

message: :GA review (see here for criteria)
#It is reasonably well written.
#:a (prose):  b (MoS): 
#It is factually accurate and verifiable.
#:a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
#It is broad in its coverage.
#:a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
#It follows the neutral point of view policy.
#:a (fair representation):  b (all significant views): 
#It is stable.
#:
#It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
#:a (tagged and captioned):  b lack of images (does not in itself exclude GA):  c (non-free images have fair use rationales): 
#Overall: 
#:a Pass/Fail: 
*The primary concern is the section "Notes", that fail criteria 1b, 1c, 1d and 2a, 2b and 2c is somewhat dependent on that, the rest of the article is ok on those points. You can either just remove the whole "Notes" section, or take time doing a total rewrite.
*the image :Image:Vegetable market.jpg needs to be removed, as it had wrong licence.
I'll give you seven days, on hold. →AzaToth 21:40, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA Review 

message: I am removing this, with hopes to clean it up later. Many of the statistics from the cited sources on this page are false, or unapplicable to the source.
216.70.37.171 13:19, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The concerns you raise are serious. Please discuss them. However, deleting citations is not acceptable as a way of dealing with them. If you will not engage in dialog, and continue in this way, you will be blocked. Please add new discussions at the END of the talk page, thank you. Notinasnaid 13:22, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: End notes/citations
Talk:Wayne Barrett

message: This charge that he is non-notable is an utterly spurious charge.
His professional involvement in writing (in the Village Voice and other publications) on public officials is of far greater long term consequence than the friviolities of insubtantial media celebrities like Britney Spears, Lindsay Lohan, Paris Hilton, who have biographical articles that do not get such a charge.
He has been publishing investigative journalism and has written published books for twenty years.Dogru144 22:50, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: Is he the same person who has written several travel titles on northeastern US and eastern Canada?
Dogru144 23:29, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Travel writings

message: Bio information about Barrett is sorely lacking.  When and where born? Educated? Married? Other children? Other jobs? His own jacket blurbs don't say much. Someone needs to do investigative research on him.  Wasted Time R 11:31, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bio information lacking

message: Needs major expansion, imo.Wikipietime (talk) 15:35, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trump topic
Talk:Nanticoke people

message: *Oppose as per Talk:Nanticoke Lenni-Lenape#Merger proposal. -Uyvsdi (talk) 01:39, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: Does anyone have any info on trading posts? Like at Seaford school district? Loftwtr (talk) 13:37, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Trading posts
Talk:Colorado River Indian Tribes

message: What is the origin (and date of origin) of this grouping of four tribes by this name? Does it ONLY reflect the arbitrary grouping of the USGOV onto the reservation, and the resultant census designation of Colorado River Indian Reservation? If so, what say this page be merged into that, and a redirect created for this page?  That page seems to include much of this page's detail.  Duff 23:09, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have more information on my own question, and will edit accordingly. -Duff 05:03, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Origin of Grouping

message: I merged Colorado River Indian Reservation in this article because it was almost complete duplicate of this article and both were very short. WP:MERGEREASON: "Duplicate: There are two or more pages on exactly the same subject, with the same scope." Yuchitown (talk) 00:13, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: It's so sad that nobody visits this often. 46.109.235.63 (talk) 17:55, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Merges
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Greg Green

message: After it was established that F0xfree, 69.116.201.26, and 88.101.172.224 are sockpuppets of blocked user Simonapro, I applied WP:BP#Evasion of blocks to strike and/or remove comments from the AfD discussion.  Upon re-reading WP:DP and WP:GD, it seems that this application of the blocking policy may have been inappropriate in the context of an AfD discussion.  I have now removed the strike tags and re-inserted comments that I had previously removed.  I apologize for these disruptions.  -- Chondrite 23:02, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Deletion review/Log/2006 November 28/Gay Nigger Association of America

message: This one is a doozy with a lot of the admins who normally do closings (especially the gutsy ones) already voicing their opinion and probably taking them out of the closing position. Given the controversy, it would be nice if Jimbo would close this. However, my money is probably on an arbitraitor or a beaucrat to step up to the plate. 205.157.110.11 23:07, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who will close it?