lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Love Train

message: England?
Surely it says ,
"The next stop that we make will be soon
Tell all the folks in Russia, and China, too"
80.2.87.189 00:03, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: I removed these factoids, Are these really note worthy? --71.198.209.193 (talk) 19:16, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  worthy of notation? 

message: Should we mention the cover version used in Trolls Holiday? Visokor (talk) 17:52, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trolls Holiday 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: not moved   Calidum 08:35, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Love Train →  – There are multiple successful recordings for songs called "Love Train". While American audiences may be more familiar with the O'Jays song, Europeans may be more familiar with Holly Johnson's song. Furthermore, the page called "Love Train" should be converted to a disambiguation page, as none currently exists for this topic. ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 13:37, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 26 March 2022
Talk:The Bridestones

message: User:Dimadick added this article to :Category:1764 archaeological discoveries, one the grounds that 1764 is apparently the year the Bridestones were first documented. I even find that unlikely (I'll bet they're shown on older maps, for example), but either way I don't think "first documented" is the same as "discovered", and I don't think this article belongs in that category - no-one would ever look for it there. The Bridestones are pretty obvious and will have been known since time immemorial. I don't want this to become an edit war. Any thoughts? Dave.Dunford (talk) 16:49, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It appears that the 1764 reference is to the use of the monument as a source of roadstone and several sources suggest it was larger before this damage occurred. I think this supports my argument. Dave.Dunford (talk) 17:04, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The article specifies that it was not recorded at all in a 1723 survey, so it was not "known since time immemorial". Dimadick (talk) 11:15, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Dave.Dunford (talk) 10:57, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discovered in 1764
Talk:Bernard Membe

message: He seems most widely referred to as "Bernard Membe", so I made the article here, as opposed to "Bernard Kamillius Membe."  Picaroon 00:53, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:1st and 10 (2003 TV series)

message: I have rated this article as start class because the relatively short length and lack of important sections like critical response, production etc. and as low importance because there is little to distinguish it from other articles about television series. --Opark 77 15:33, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article assessment

message: July 2007 marks Sage Steele's first time guest hosting on the show.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.237.205.159 (talk) 02:52, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sage Steele on 1st and 10 

message: So far, Jemele Hill is only female panelist on 1st and 10 but soon there will be another woman guest panel; otherwise, It will the same or different guest panelist on the show.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.189.21.176 (talk) 01:55, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guest Panelists on 1st and 10 

message: I Know Erik Kuselias & Scoop Jackson have filled in for Skip. Wonder who else in for him if he's not available.--75.28.93.134 (talk) 19:30, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subsituting for Skip Bayless 

message: I LIKE KNOW THE % OF PEOPLE WHO ARE GOING TO WATCH  THIS DUAL SUPERBOWL OR SHOULD I SAY SOUPBOWL OF A MATCH . I WOULD LIKE TO TO KNOW WHAT SKIP BAYLESS TAKE ON THIS IS . AS FOR ME I THINK I'M GOING TO  IMPRESS MY WIFE THAT WEEKEND AND CLEAN THE REFRIGERATOR !  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 136.2.1.101 (talk) 14:45, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  AFC @NFC CUMPIONS  
Talk:Smasher (Marvel Comics)

message: This guy shows up in a 1972 Amazing Spiderman, #116. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mattbarton.exe (talk • contribs) 00:58, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Same name, different character.   24.136.11.242 02:08, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  First appearance
Talk:Roosevelt Elementary School (Tampa, Florida)

message: I am very pleased that Roosevelt Elementary was able to be placed on the historic registry. As a 1999 graduate of Roosevelt, I was quite shocked that the school was not on the registry during that time. As time passed, more and more of the South Tampa community became aware of this. Again, I am most certainly pleased that this process was able to be completed, as the school holds a lot of historical value. Wslupecki (talk) 17:10, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Historic designation

message: I added a history section in efforts to expand this article. The information comes from the school's website. Wslupecki (talk) 00:08, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: History
Talk:Demodand

message: The demodands appear in the 3rd party 'Tome of Horrors' by Necromancer Games. They will also be appearing in some capacity in 'The Great Beyond' by Paizo Publishing next year (I'll mention that but otherwise refrain from editing the article, since I'm the author of that forthcoming book, and I'd rather not have one or two editors get into a tizzy over COI). Both of those sources should add to the secondary sources for the article overall.Shemeska (talk) 02:49, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ha! I finally found a ref for demodands being in The Great Beyond. Thanks for mentioning both of those. -Drilnoth (talk) 00:52, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Some Additional Sources
Talk:Deadmalls.com

message: While Irongargoyle is quite right that the article doesn't meet A7, I'm not clear on how it is notable. Both source mentions are "in passing" (though I'll take a scan through the NPR piece to see if it details the site some more.) Even that wouldn't be multiple non-trivial mentions, however, and the first source is a "mention in passing"-unquestionably trivial. Seraphimblade 01:18, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I posted another reference and removed the tag. I agree that the Kansas City Star reference is in passing, but not the NPR reference. The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette reference is definitely not in passing either. This should now pass WP:WEB. Best, Irongargoyle 01:45, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The Post-Gazette is quite in-depth, and it sounds like the full NPR story is as well. Seraphimblade 01:50, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability?

message: What else is there to be said?  Deadmalls.com is a dead website.  It sports the same gloom of better-days-gone-by as the malls they "highlight".  Most of the information they post has dates on it from the mid-oughts.
The subject's notability was marginal from the start, but now it's just over and done.
96.237.114.137 (talk) 04:48, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deadwebsites.com
Talk:Systematic ideology

message: I have just merged public-domain text from DAP, which was larger than the pre-exsting Wikipedia article.  Some of this is redundant with the pre-existing "Walford" section.  Someone will need to merge the non-redundant information from the "Walford" section into the new "Theory" section. —Psychonaut 01:04, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Walford" section

message: The SSA was active during the Victorian period and should not be a "Redirect" to this article. For more information on the SSA see: GoogleBook - Science Reform and politics in the Victorian Britain: the Social Science Association by Laurence Goldman. Vernon White . . . Talk  16:29, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: The Social Science Association
Talk:Schinus molle

message: What happened to the history of this article prior to January, 2007? Schinus molle redirects here, and I assume it was moved from there, but the history is gone.--Curtis Clark 01:07, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I created the article from scratch on Jan 3 2007, which is why there's no prior history! Schinus molle used to redirect to Schinus. I moved it to redirect to this article. Squeezeweasel 13:44, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, yes, sorry, I remember now that all the links went to Schinus. Thanks for creating the species page.--Curtis Clark 15:40, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirects 

message: It would be interesting to add some history on how the missionaries brought the tree to California back in the early 1820s. --Wws (talk) 13:53, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: By all means, please do. AngoraFish 木 23:25, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  History in California 

message: I removed this from the article as the first part is uncited and the second part needs work to make it encyclopedic: "Thia tree was brought with eucalyptus trees up the Pacific coast by the conquistadors as a source for making chicha (a fermented alcoholic beverage from the ripe pink peppercorns).  The 'eucalyptus' trees referred to in the previous sentence are obviously not from the genus Eucalyptus indigenous to Australia and nearby islands, as members of this species were only carried to the 'old world' by Joseph Banks, scientist of the Captain Cook expedition in 1770." Zaian (talk) 08:22, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conquistadors / Eucalyptus 

message: The article describes the tree is asouth America, several US states and Puerto Rico, Australia, and a general remark about it being an invasive weed tree. I encountered it in a story about a place in southern France, faux poivrier was the name. Is it just as invasive around the Mediterranean Sea or any place in Africa? Where is it grown for its uses flavoring drinks? Is it a cash crop in its native habitat? This is a good article, it got me curious. — Prairieplant (talk) 17:26, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  European or African spread?
Talk:Interstate 66 (Kansas–Kentucky)

message: After Popular Bluff it would still be south of 44, so how would it follow the number rules? Tulsaschoolboard 22:21, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If I-24 is a guide (another West-East numbered interstate that crosses multiple West-East interstates), the numbering point that matters is apprently the planned eastern termination point. (I-24 fits into the schema from Nashville to Chatt. but not west of Nashville) Jon (talk) 22:25, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Numbering considerations

message: Is this an extension of the current Interstate 66, or is this a different Interstate that just has the same number? The lead says "The U.S. Department of Transportation had plans to extend Interstate 66" implying that this is a extension of I-66, but the "Route description" section says "No direct connection is currently planned between there and the unrelated Interstate 66 in Virginia and the District of Columbia" implying that this a different Interstate that has the same number. Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 12:50, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe the idea was that it was supposed to be connected, but the plans changed when Virginia expressed a lack of interest in connecting the two sections. —Scott5114↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 20:14, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure why the word "unrelated" was there. Each state is/was planning to build their segment of I-66 within their own respective borders, meaning that the western expansion of I-66 would be built piecemeal in various stages. Because there is now no direct connection currently being planned, this would result in non-contiguous segments, similar to what Interstate 76, Interstate 84 and Interstate 86 have now. Zzyzx11 (talk) 19:08, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  VA-DC I-66 vs this I-66
Talk:Chester Castle

message: #The stub needs to be considerably expanded.
#It should make use of sections.
#More photos need to be added.
#References and Citations are crucial for wikipedia, and so these must be added as the article is expanded. Make sure that as many as possible are "in-line" citations.(See WP:References, WP:V, and WP:CITE for guidance.)
Peter I. Vardy 13:25, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment Report 

message: :Done. Peter I. Vardy (talk) 12:08, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article is also slightly inaccurate:
Chester Castle was started not in 1069, but in 1070 by Gherbod the Flemming not Hugh of Avranches (who only became Earl in 1071).
It was besieged during the English Civil War? - technically it wasn't, the city was. 
It was rebuilt as a prison over a 37-year period from the 1790s - no, it was already a prison and slated by John Howard as one of the worst in the country.
Please feel free to follow the links from my article at http://www.chesterwiki.com/Chester_Castle if you would like to update it with references - I added a link to this page in the hope that it might be useful to someone, but it was deleted.
:If you know what the true facts are, you would have been welcome to have corrected it yourself. The link was removed according to previous discussions about the link, about which main contributors to the chesterwiki know and contributed,  DDStretch  (talk) 12:30, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There was and is no requirement to discuss this issue with the members of the Chester Wiki, and, indeed, as can be seen here, the general view from other Wikipedia editors with particular inerests in the business of External Links (who were consulted both on here and privately) was that the guidelines veered towards not including the Chester Wiki link. I went against these guidelines after further consultation with other Wikipedia editors and included the Chester Wiki on a one-time basis for the Chester article. Given the priorities different editors have, we invited people who knew about the Chester Wiki articles (as authors of them) to update the information here, as they are best placed to know about the content and the sources that are at some point needed as references. This is because we are also busy doing other things. No one has been able to do this yet, either from here or the Chester Wiki, but the invitation for any of you to do so still stands.  DDStretch  (talk) 18:11, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Inaccuracies

message: This from British-history.ac.uk should be useful to anyone trying to expand the article. Nev1 (talk) 17:37, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Source
Talk:Aldford Castle

message: #The article needs to be expanded.
#It should make use of sections.
#Photos need to be added.
#References and Citations are crucial for wikipedia, and so these must be added as the article is expanded. Make sure that as many as possible are "in-line" citations.(See WP:References, WP:V, and WP:CITE for guidance.)
Peter I. Vardy 13:20, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment Report
Talk:Degrassi Community School

message: The article says the school was established in 1976, and says that it's the same school in the first two series (Degrassi Junior High, Degrass High). This is incorrect. The school in DJH and DH aren't even the same schools. According to the Degrassi Crest, the school was established in 1986, while the Degrassi Junior High burnt down (or was it Degrass High School that was burnt down?). Anyways, there is some major confusion regarding that. Just clearing it up. Will change it myself, if I get the time. -theblueflamingoSquawk 05:54, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Errors
Talk:The Brave Little Toaster to the Rescue

message: This article needs some cleanup real badly.  The grammar, augh.  68.202.33.218 01:21, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Should somebody include what kind of supercomputer the Wiggenstein is, or at least what he resembles and/or is a parody of? That would be pretty valuable.
TurtleShroom! :) †Jesus Loves You and Died for you!† 18:14, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Supercomputer
Talk:Chilean Navy

message: There isn't one? Is there a NATO designation for Chilean ships? -LlywelynII (talk) 17:53, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Ship prefix]]?

message: * There has been an anonymous edit by the austrian freedom party (a far right wing party): . Can anyone please verify this edit? ty --88.117.86.49 (talk) 15:36, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: these guys look pretty armored --Andersmusician $ 00:52, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Issues that need to be addressed 
Talk:Banking in the United Kingdom

message: Is it still an article with unsourced information? Patek 01:26, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category 

message: "The industrialist turned banker[who?] could assist his own industry since he not only provided a local means of payment, but also accepted deposits. Here we have a parallel with the early goldsmith banking." 
This is not fitting with the tone of the article and doesn't make sense. Another user has added the [who?] comment. Perhaps it should be removed unless anyone can figure out who it is referring to.
Whileworth (talk) 10:05, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: 18th Century

message: Industrial revolution 196.50.199.30 (talk) 15:47, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Social science
Talk:In the Zone (The Outer Limits)

message: The synopsis is half-synopsis, half-teaser. A synopsis should reveal the plot and ending of the story, not leave off before the end.
:I wrote out what happens in the rest of the episode, though that's from my memory of seeing the episode over ten years ago, so it might be inaccurate. 82.128.189.108 (talk) 14:01, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Synopsis

message: The scene in which Tanner saves the kid was filmed at GM Place, would this be worth including in the article? CoW mAnX (talk) 23:35, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: GM Place
Talk:Donovan Catholic High School

message: Greeting editors!
Before adding or re-adding any content to this article, allow me to make some big suggestions based on some past experience I have had:
1.  Go visit Wikipedia:WikiProject Schools to get a feel for what Wikipedia is looking for in articles about schools.  There are a great many things that you can research and include, but there are also many things that you may passionately feel are important, and simply don't belong in an encyclopedia article.  Remember, this is not your school's homepage ... it is an encyclopedia article about your school.
2.  Specifically check out:  What not to include.  This section outlines things that, even if you think they are important, will likely get deleted eventually, and would likely not hold up if the article gets sent to arbitration.  Among the things not to include are events of short term importance like who caught a winning touchdown, how far the team made it in the basketball playoffs (unless it was like a top 4 finish or something like that), a recent viral outbreak, the names of coaches or teachers (unless they are otherwise notable), this year's spring musical, etc, etc.  These are all either unencyclopedic, or are matters of short term interest.
3.  Consider having this article assessed by either the folks at WikiProject Schools, or at Wikipedia:WikiProject Minnesota.  they can be reached by the big links at the top of this Talk Page.  People associated with the project will assess the article, and will give suggestions for improvement.  This may help more specifically guide editors as to what needs to be added and what needs to be removed.
Best of luck! LonelyBeacon (talk) 23:05, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What NOT to include in this article (and what TO include)
Talk:Disappearing gun

message: The disappearing guns were the least useful of the coast defense assets, as they were positioned to defend against warships entering Manila Bay
I'm not sure this is really true.  The guns were of limited use against shore targets, of course, but Ft. Drum, Smith and Hearn alone could not have reliably kept the IJN out of Manila Bay without the minefields, and once a couple heavy ships were in, taking the forts out from two sides simultaneously would have been far easier.  Frank and Hughes were a real part of keeping the minefields covered by fire.  The anti-ship functions of the harbor defenses worked almost perfectly seaward, and had the guns been casemated, they would not have worked at all to landward.
The disappearing guns did exactly what they were meant to do, the real problem was that the mobile forces had not been allowed to.
It's also worth remembering that the disappearing emplacements provided better cover than the "bullseyes' that Hearn and Smith sat on. Anmccaff (talk) 03:07, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Battle for Manila Bay 

message: http://www.russojapanesewar.com/images/hardware/canet.jpg
Anmccaff (talk) 17:39, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Self-explanatory. 

message: http://www.google.com/patents/US37232
There was also a variant that was essentially a globe valve with a cannon in it instead of fluid.  Anmccaff (talk) 18:51, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Horizontally disappearing gun 

message: [155 or 120 on narrow gauge track] or []  Vive la France.  Anmccaff (talk) 07:00, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Narrow-gauge rail DG 

message: Might this  film clip be used in the article? If so how and where?SovalValtos (talk) 23:13, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Film clip
Talk:Passepartout

message: I came to this site as a result of searching for the meaning of passepartout on Goggle and I was surprised that "mat" was not mentioned as a synonym when that is clearly the word used by artists and picture framers throughout North America so far as I know.  Still, I am not clear about what the correct spelling of mat in this usage should be.
The correct spelling is "matte" as in "matte painting".
Done! ;-) SaintCahier (talk) 02:04, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Justin King (American football)

message: Hi Jahseh17 (talk) 08:20, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Low