lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Why Change Your Wife?

message: The article currently states that the film was released on May 22, 1920.  There is an advert on page 20 of the April 24, 1920 issue of the New York Times (archived here) which states that the film "OPENS TO-DAY AT 2 P.M..", which would  indicate a much earlier opening date. Is this suitable as a source?
(For those who cannot access the NYT, there is a scan of the advert here; scroll down to view it.)
Thanks in advance for input.  --Mondo Beer (talk) 07:46, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: - yes, the NYT is a reliable source, and I've changed the date per the link you provided. Thanks! Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 11:58, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks, and may I apologise for what follows?  Someone else in that Twitter thread has pointed me in the direction of the AFICatalog entry for the film. It has this to say: "The film had various pre-release showings throughout the country before its national release on 2 May 1920", which seems to muddy the waters somewhat.  IMDb has a release date of February 29 in Los Angeles, although I'm not sure how trustworthy that site is.  --Mondo Beer (talk) 13:16, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

text: Per WP:CITEIMDB, we should not use IMDB as a ref. If you have other sources for an earlier date (other than IMDB), then go with them. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 13:17, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release date
Talk:Watson (surname)

message: Watson is an old Anglo-Saxon name based on the Germanic name Walter. It should be classified as an English surname; it appeared in Scotland through the English migration.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.176.124.64 (talk) 01:23, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

message: "It is related to the surnames Nelson, Getson, Jordan and Judson": why? What have they got in common? Only the second element "-son", it seems to me. 62.98.186.21 (talk) 09:56, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree - this unsourced bit of information is pretty much useless, and I can find nothing that reliably backs it up or explains it. There is this Ancestry.com page on Getson which explains a relationship to Jordan, but not the others. I'll remove it apart from on the Getson page (which I see now does link to that source). The relationships are tenuous at best. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 02:12, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why? 

message: At what point does a person become well-known enough to be added to the Wikipedia? Would historical relevance need to be taken into consideration? Also, can I make my own Wikipedia Biography, or would that be a bias assessment? 2601:5CE:4000:AC00:9DF5:B073:DEF:6E4 (talk) 21:41, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:TALK is not the place to discuss these questions - I suggest creating an account and asking at the WP:TEAHOUSE. However, have a look at WP:NOTABILITY & WP:COI. (I will delete this section tomorrow.) Laterthanyouthink (talk) 22:55, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fame and Popularity
Talk:V (1984 TV series)

message: This plot summary on this page is too specific. What is the show about? The first sentence requires that you know a lot about the series. 150.231.26.105 (talk) 19:19, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot summary

message: Does somebody who knows more than I do want to add a section on this page (not enough info yet to warrant its own page) about the series being remade, starring Alan Tudyk and Morena Baccarin (among others)? --V2Blast (talk) 04:27, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remake? 

message: The entry for the writer of episode 19 (Colley Cibber) obviously shouldn't link to the early 18th century poet Colley Cibber, but unsure how best to correct or set up that entry. 67.189.252.139 (talk) 01:35, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colley Cibber entry? 

message: I know this isn't a "chat forum", but does anybody know who narrated the opening sequence? If so, could this info be added to the article?
Thanks!
69.136.13.211 (talk) 20:20, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Narrator? 

message: The list of episodes deleted? Will find out why, otherwise will restore. Calendar2 (talk) 21:36, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: found it: List of V (1984 TV series) episodes, deleted by this editor Calendar2 (talk) 21:37, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: list of episodes deleted?

message: Citation for the comic book series, if needed - http://www.comics.org/series/3003/  Asat (talk) 03:49, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  The comics 

message: Article is from 2004, and "reception" implies a contemporary review.  An article from 1985 should be used instead. JBrownIII (talk) 17:26, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception section 

message: I mention here some sources linking David Icke's ruling lizards conspiracy theory to V, perhaps especially this 1984 series with its proposed wedding of Charles and Diana, tho probably currently at most one source counts as Reliable. Tlhslobus (talk) 12:25, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to David Icke needed?
Talk:Vrbové

message: During the Austro-Hungarian empire, in northern Hungary not far from Verbó was another town named Verbosz. See the map at this location. One suggestion is that Verbosz might have been Verbovec, now part of the township of Michalovce; but this is in a different part of Slovakia. If this suggestion is incorrect, which I suspect, what is the closest place today to Verbosz? Any comments on this would be appreciated. Thanks, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 14:22, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Verbó &  Verbosz (Austro-Hungary) 
Talk:Ronald Shusett

message: Mr Shusett had some redlinks pointing to his name, so I thought relevant to give him a page. He co-wrote Alien and was quite involved in Total Recall, so I think that's enough to get a page. Plus his page already existed with a wrong spelling and crediting him as an artist. I don't know why this page was never corrected or deleted, so why should my page be, while it's correct and in good condition? There are a lot of pages about things, particular places, organizations, etc. related to an American city only, and that kind of page remains, but who cares anywhere else in the world?... So if these pages are relevant, I don't think this deletion is relevant at all. Klow (talk) 18:18, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Regardless of the previous situation, I believe this article asserts and demonstrates sufficient notability for its subject as a screenwriter of some fairly well-known films.  IMDB is not the best reference but, frankly, I remember his name from Alien and I'm willing to believe his credits for the rest.  If there's a problem, perhaps this should go to AfD rather than the speedy deletion process; I'd appreciate hearing about it if someone disagrees with my removal of the speedy tag, and apologize for substituting my judgment. Accounting4Taste:talk 18:23, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion
Talk:Hezbollah (Iran)

message: I know the Hezbollah is a terrorist group. Wouldn't it suffice to label it as such and leave it at that? "Strong-arm thugs" could be toned down a bit that way. Also, it could not hurt to elaborate on to what "undesirable activities" their attacks were expanded, instead of creating the impression of them killing anyone, anywhere.
In closing, is the Hezbollah of Iran that much distinct from the Lebanese that it warrants its own article? I am under the impression that there were many splinter groups summarized under the term, regardless of their location. --Dalric (talk) 18:29, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sources? --BoogaLouie (talk) 19:34, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: Have reworded lead to emphasize the members' name rather than Hezbollah as it isn't really much of a "group" --BoogaLouie (talk) 19:33, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Hezbollahi
Talk:Area codes 306, 639, and 474

message: The "communities missing" section appears to be missing well over half of Saskatchewan. This should be fixed, or has Wikipedia somehow obtained a list of communities that will go to 639? 71.17.200.66 (talk) 02:30, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Communities missing

message: The three-digit prefixes for all phone numbers in the North America Numbering Plan... including Saskatchewan .. is not 10,000 possible prefixes. It is 791. How do I know? Look up the rules. The first digit cannot be a 0 or a 1 so that leaves the digits 2 through 9, which means or 8 possible digits for the first place. The next two digits can be any combination of digits from 0 to 9 so that's 10^2 possible combinations for the second two digits. However, prefixes ending in 11 are disallowed so that's 8 less. The prefix 555 is disallowed so that's 1 less. So that's 8 * 10^2 -8 -1 = 791.  Allthenamesarealreadytaken (talk) 02:55, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Three digit prefix
Talk:Uniacke Square

message: I think we've fixed the "inappropriate tone" thing.  I'm removing the tag.  RobHutten (talk) 18:59, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I noticed that the text referencing the area's unemployment rate is duplicated in the article, each with its own citation number.  Plus, the stated claim is difficult to verify from the cited reference, which is a web page containing a map that does not appear to specifically define the boundaries of the community discussed.  Finally, when using the map feature to map the variable "Unemployment rate", the colour of the map's  "aggregation areas" over a significant portion of the discussed community is shown as "Not Available" (i.e. dark blue).  Therefore, in all fairness, unless there is a more authoritative reference, the unemployment rate statements in this article should be removed altogether. A. Macdonald. 24.222.87.186 (talk) 16:19, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Repetition
Talk:St. Mary's High School (Stockton, California)

message: This is a start on this school article. Further advice is available at the school project page.
1. Add some topics (like history, notable alumni, etc)
2. Keep adding references
3. Add pictures
4. Ask for an assessment at the schools project.EagleFan (talk) 19:04, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assess
Talk:Muneo Tokunaga

message: It is claimed in the article that Tokunaga Muneo is a specialist in Sanskrit and Vedic but also one of the world's foremost authorities on Indian languages. It needs some valid citation along with details of which are the languages he is considered one " of world's foremost authorities". In India there are some 300 to 1000 or so languages.  --C.R.Selvakumar (talk) 21:43, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Question
Talk:Houston Brewing Company

message: Not sure I entirely agree with elements of WPLOCAL (which seems a common POV). I think that it is suitable to have a separate section on the Brewing company rather than have it as part of the Houston page. Mainly as I think the Scottish breweries are poorly represented and merging them into the local pages is a little counter productive as I think there is a great deal more info to add. 
Adding pictures tomorrow.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Reid.rjk (talk • contribs) Dec 14, 2007
: Hi there. While I think there is very possibly scope for an article here, it is very much borderline. You refer to Houston ales (which one?) as a 'major beer' in a comment - that they are certainly not. It is a microbrewery with a small capacity and a spread around the local area, with some coverage further afield. In the context of wider work on Scottish breweries, it can be useful - and hence I defer to your judgement and support keeping the article. --Breadandcheese (talk) 01:44, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: My apologies for the major comment, I was writing 'major beer in the West of Scotland' but ran out of room. :-/ I agree about a wider assault on Scottish breweries as they are chronically under represented and will be adding content to that effect. I had intended to do this when I made the page but was sidetracked by work pressure. Reid.rjk (talk) 04:01, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger
Talk:N. John Habraken

message: This page is terrible and needs, at the very least, a thorough rewrite to demonstrate what relevance the projects chosen as illustrations have to Habraken’s work. 92.234.212.163 (talk) 15:45, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page contains largely irrelevant and poorly contextualized material
Talk:Maurice K. Smith

message: Using this space to list more links + information that may not be considered appropriate for the main article.
* A short article about his work in NZ http://www.lostproperty.org.nz/architects/maurice-k-smith/
* He designed a wall-sized polychromatic mosaic which used to be in the Odeon theatre on Queen Street, Aucklandhttps://caterinariva.com/2015/12/15/a-hollow-action-a-room-held-together-with-letters/ in 1957 but he never saw it completed before he moved to the United States.http://www.stuff.co.nz/auckland/local-news/79971938/mosaic-to-be-saved-in-the-old-odeon-theatre-on-aucklands-queen-st. Numbers related to mural: more than 47,300 tiles, approximately 7.4 metres wide, 4m high and weighs about 20 tonnes. An effort was made to save the mosaic before the Odeon was demolished. 
* Articles about the preservation effort:
 * Major effort underway to save Akld mosaic. Radio New Zealand's Checkpoint on 6 May 2016 http://www.radionz.co.nz/national/programmes/checkpoint/audio/201799796/major-effort-underway-to-save-akld-mosaic
 * Mosaic to be saved in the old Odeon theatre on Auckland's Queen St. Stuff. May 16 2016. http://www.stuff.co.nz/auckland/local-news/79971938/mosaic-to-be-saved-in-the-old-odeon-theatre-on-aucklands-queen-st
 * Watch: Heroic effort to save 50s mosaic underway by Auckland City Council.  18 May 2016. http://ourauckland.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/articles/news/2016/05/watch-heroic-effort-to-save-50s-mosaic-underway/
Linnah (talk) 12:00, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional links about Maurice K. Smith in NZ
Talk:Nathaniel Woodhull

message: Currently the article says
Yet the source given for this (Woodhull Family) states (my emphasis):
The "Delancey's 17th British Regiment" mentioned above was the 17th Dragoons.
This account ties in with one of the sources given in the Oliver De Lancey Jr. article:
*
Another says that De Lancey tried to stop his men:
*
So where does the "detachment of Fraser's Highlanders led by captain Sir James Baird" come from as it is not in the source on the page? -- PBS (talk) 05:18, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Murder
Talk:Tom Daley (footballer)

message: i played for west bromwich albion season 1989/90 no senier apperances
re peterborough united i played 60 games in leauge f a cup and friendy matches.
hope this information is of help
regards TOM DALEY  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thomasd153 (talk • contribs) 13:12, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  clubs played for and number of games played
Talk:Parkway Pines, New Jersey

message: This is just a stub. I hope to do a lot more research and perhaps others will as well. Parkway Pines is interesting from a historical perspective because it was at the leading edge of the migration from city to suburb, in this case aided by the recently constructed Garden State Parkway, a four lane uninterrupted road (except for the occasional barrier toll) which whisked people from city to outlying suburb in an hour or so.
I am the original author, and I thank the person who added the part about Ramtown. I grew up in Parkway Pines;my grandparents were original homesteaders there and were close friends for many years with other homesteaders.
The Fishers added a second story in the late 1960s, becoming the first family in Parkway Pines to do so. Interestingly, the Parkway Pines ZIP code, 08701, is a Lakewood ZIP code, though the community resides entirely in Brick. When it was first constructed, the enclave was much closer to populated areas of Lakewood than to the nearest populated areas of Brick.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wbennettjr (talk • contribs) 21:48, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Miguel Pro/Archive 1

message: It would be helpful if people could at least try to produce a neutral article about the facts of Pro's life - hurling epithets like "martyr" and "fascist" about won't result in a good article.  I know nothing about Pro, apart from mentions in Graham Greene's The Lawless Roads.  I don't think I know anything more after reading this article, which is a shame.  --  ajn</span> (talk) 09:56, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV and cleanup tags added 

message: I have probably removed too much in some areas, and not enough in others.  It would be good if any additions to this page stuck to Wikipedia:NPOV and avoided the hysterical tone which has marred this article.  Additions should also be properly referenced.  I've removed the "references" section, because one was a hagiography and the other two seemed to be general Mexican news/history sites with no specific references to Pro.  --  ajn</span> (talk) 10:21, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: Pro was executed from order of rule. He was newer tried. He denied his participation and assassins too. No proof against him in his case. Etc. (Lothar Groppe: P. Michael Pro SJ, , in czech). Cinik 19:38, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Totaly Disputed 

message: Regardless of Pro's guilt or innocence in the crime for which he was executed, the last line of this article at present was clearly written by someone with a bone to pick, and pushes an argument (one not even referred to in the body of the article). To whit: "Their publication [photos showing Pro as his execution] outside of Mexico focused world attention on the catholic experiment on creating an american version of vatican in Mexico, wich ended in failure and treason by the catholic authorities, who in the negotiations known as "Arreglos", exchanged the lives of the rebels for economic profit." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.86.49.228 (talk • contribs) 
: Quite right.  I've come to the conclusion that the only solution is to scrub everything in the article for which a reference isn't provided, and insist rigorously on neutral sources for anything added.  Given that most of the information about Pro on the web is in hagiographies, that's going to result in a very short article, but that's better than the current situation. --ajn (talk) 04:41, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Argument Begging 

message: The old version of the article is here.  Please make sure any information returned to the article is properly verifiable and neutral.  --ajn (talk) 06:03, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: RFC Comment: Starting with the summary, content was made NPOV with the addition of alleged. The second statement was simplified. Electrawn 19:25, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  A fresh start
Talk:From Bauhaus to Our House

message: Regardless of whether much of what Wolfe said was historically or technically correct, he was an early voice pointing out that buildings which win awards from architectural societies or publications are too often buildings which are hated by the actual people who have to live or work within them, and that some architects seem to have impressing other architects as a higher goal than serving the interests of the end-users of what they build.  It would be nice if suitable connections with other articles could be made on this point. AnonMoos (talk) 12:23, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: involution of professional architecture
Talk:Monogenic system

message: I was trying to find a less technical definition.  The problem appears to be that monogenic is just a term grafted onto a mathematical circumstance, and has little independent reality.  
* Between Laws and Models: Some Philosophical Morals of Lagrangian Mechanics, page 43
Lanczos (1986, p. 30) calls applied forces of this kind monogenic (‘monogenic’ for ‘single origin’) as against polygenic. Goldstein et al (2002) follow him; and I shall also adopt these terms.
 
The Variational Principles of Mechanics, Cornelius Lanczos, page 30: 
It seems desirable to have a distinctive name for forces which are derivable from a scalar quantity, irrespective of whether they are conservative or not.  This book adopts the name "monogenic" (which means "single-generated") as a distinguishing name for this category of forces ... [others are] "polygenic". 
— MaxEnt 00:53, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Monogenic is a synonym for monic e.g. a monic polynomial. Mathematicians like the word, Lanczos probably picked it up from them. 67.198.37.16 (talk) 02:54, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Toward a less technical definition
Talk:Guilsborough Academy

message: If someone feels moved to access them, good looking sources are available here, here, here, and here, but behind paywalls. TerriersFan (talk) 03:52, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources available 

message: I reverted 9 edits to the last good version due to vandalism followed by a well-intentioned blanking of the page. • Gene93k (talk) 02:29, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert on 30 November 2008 
Talk:National and University Library in Zagreb

message: Sources say NSK was established in 1607. I've left it at that, but I think it's highly dubious. NSK traces its roots back to the Jesuits' library, which was formed in 1607. However, that library was what it was: library of the Jesuit order, and in no way, shape or form a "national" library. My guess that this is done in order to artificially make NSK look older than it actually is. GregorB (talk) 20:01, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A correction here: Jesuits' library was not a national library, but it is now considered (perhaps retroactively) a university library, since the Zagreb University stems from the Jesuit Academy. So yes, in a way, what is today known as NSK was really established in 1607. GregorB (talk) 21:09, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I left it also, but in sources we see that Jesuit grammar school was founded then. Earlier mention of nay library is actually 1611, but in 1669 Academy is formed, and that may be the trace of real founding year of Academic library. I am not sure that we should use 1607 for a founding of National and University Library in Zagreb. --Ąnαșταη (ταlκ) 12:10, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: A comment on establishment date
Template talk:Green Bay Packers starting quarterback navbox

message: This is getting really annoying.  Per WP:V, someone needs to show a reliable reference that Aaron Rodgers has started a game for the Packers to even hint at being added to this template.  As per the norm on other QB templates, QB's who have started the majority of a season are added to this list.  Rodgers hasn't even started once!  Im tired of reverting so I fully protected the template. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk ♦ contribs) @  06:57, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fully Protected 

message: Matt Flynn is listed as the starting quarterback from 2010 to the present.  He is the backup quarterback and not the starter.  This should be changed to Aaron Rodgers from 2008 to the present.  Thanks!
Brintel (talk) 02:02, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed.--Yankees10 02:09, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request on 18 January 2012
Talk:Caudron C.460

message: I have a few more photographs of the C.460 that I'd like to add as they are some nice shots. I don't want to bloat the article with pictures, so is there a way to add this to a gallery of some sorts? Wingtipvortex (talk) 04:35, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures 

message: I'd like to get some more sources on this article, as well as mentioning N6989, the only C460 that flies today. I know that it is based on Flabob, and have met the builder. How would I go about making this a better article? I'm new here, so pointers would be good. Thanks! Wingtipvortex (talk) 04:42, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  General talk