lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Sugar Daddy (1999 song)

message: I have reverted this page to its last "article" revision.
If you think the article fails WP:MUSIC or WP:NN and should be deleted, please request deletion or speedy deletion, but don't simply blank the page (please see WP:BLANK).
If you think the article should be merged with the article about the album or the musical, please do merge the information of this article into the respective article before deletion.
And please always move pages first, changing the subject of the article or the redirect may break links.
Thank You. Completefailure (talk) 00:44, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restored article
Talk:The Vocabula Review

message: Fiske died end of April. vocabula.com now shows a placeholder page. --88.73.43.160 (talk) 16:11, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Offline 
Talk:The Mind of the Maker

message: Kevinalewis made a great start here, and several people have cleaned up the grammar, but this article still needs more work. I'm not sure one reference justifies "often quoted", for example, and I'm not sure why "The" has vanished from the title. Radagast3 (talk)
To restore "The" to the title, I've moved this page, and checked the links from the Dorothy L. Sayers article are OK. Radagast3 (talk) 03:49, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I am a former academic that came here to see if the Latin dedication appearing in that work has ever been translated in a publication (to check our own translation of it). I did some edits — both URLs were dead when I arrived, and there were various other technical problems. I do not like leaving articles heavily tagged, but I think the remaining edits need to be made by a registered editor, and there is significant work remaining to be done (WP:OR issue, mislabeled section isue, etc.). For a start, if you can find page numbers and other relevant bibliographic information for the two book references, and change the name for the section to something accurate to the content appearing (literary criticism and significance having specific meanings not captured by that section), then the section tag and even the article tag might be removed. However, apart from the one cited review, the article is poorly sourced, and even that review is poorly used, the earlier article editors relying on their own book interpretations and Sayers descriptions, rather than drawing from the review or other sources to create such content. Leaving this to you, as a regular dedicated editor there. 2601:246:C700:C:E1DD:E6DD:7781:735 (talk) 15:28, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mind of the Maker edits
Talk:Swallowed (song)

message: Wow. That's actually kinda sad. From the looks of things, there has been an on-going genre war here for about a year, with a lot of it being more recent. So far, there has been no discussion on the talk page and very few edit summaries. Both of those things need to change.
From a brief look through the history, the following editors have been involved to one degree or another: , , , , , , , , , , ,  blocked, , , , .
Several of the IPs are obviously the same person. If any of the registered accounts have also used IPs, you might want to mention that now.
There currently is no in-line cite for a genre. The only one I see being cited at any point is Mikeis1996's, which Statik N removed twice (saying it is a blog). The source does call the song "post-grunge", but it self-identifies as a blog. The relevant guideline here is WP:SPS.
There are two walls of text discussing the issue, with no resolution, here and here. The relevant guideline here is WP:V.
Long story short: There is not an established consensus to label this song as grunge, post-grunge, Tuvan throat singing, Nu Viking zombie melodic death metal or anything else. As a result, we seem to be left with whatever the sources say. I haven't looked yet. It is possible that reliable sources have nothing to say on the issue or might say various things that might contradict each other. I'm open to suggestions.
Warnings for genre warring, blocks, edit protecting the article, ANI cases, etc. are all options that are on the table, as needed.
For the moment, I am removing the genre and replacing it with a hidden note requesting discussion. Let's see how it goes. - SummerPhDv2.0 01:21, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think I've messed with this page in over a year...all I would've done was revert new or unexperienced editors or IPs. I say that a source which specifically genre-categorizes the song is unlikely to exist. If we have any genre at all, I think it's best to label it as the band's root genre (alternative rock), but it would most likely just cause more warring. The amount of warring here is surprisingly appalling. dannymusiceditor  Speak up!  18:22, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre warring 
Talk:Sweet Lorraine (Uriah Heep song)

message: This page lacks explanation as to if there is any relationship between this song and the one of the same title by Nat King Cole. 84.92.202.52 (talk) 17:34, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: @84.92.202.52 Edit: Actually by Burwell/Parish 1928 I thought it was Nat King Cole but he just sang it excuse me 84.92.202.52 (talk) 17:38, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

text: There is no relationship whatsoever. They are just two songs with the same title (does happen, it seems). There is a hatnote at the top of the page to help explain. The Cliff Burwell and Mitchell Parish one is quite wonderful though:  Martinevans123 (talk) 18:05, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nat King Cole
Talk:HMS Dartmouth (1911)

message: The infobox says she was launched on the 14 February 1911 but the text in the article has "Dartmouth was launched on 14 December 1910". The Times reports she was launched from Barrow on 14 February 1911 by "Lady Dartmouth". MilborneOne (talk) 17:38, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Conway's says she was launched on 14 December 1910, as does Dittmar and Colledge, while the series of articles by Lyon in Warship says she was launched on 13 February 1911.Nigel Ish (talk) 19:00, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The Engineer states in its 17 February 1911 edition that Dartmouth was launched "Tuesday last" which would give 14 February.Nigel Ish (talk) 19:08, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Friedman says 13 Feb 11, although I'd trust the newspapers more in this case as I can easily see an Admiralty clerk making a typo in the ship's cover about her launching date. I don't have access to the Times, so could one of you UK-based gentlemen update the article and source the fact?--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 21:37, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

text: The Times on the 15 February 1911 had "Launch of the Dartmouth - The cruiser Dartmouth was launched at Messrs. Vickers, Sons, and Maxim's yard at Barrow yesterday by Lady Dartmouth." There was also info in the the papers of Feb 11 and Feb 14 about the intended launch. MilborneOne (talk) 16:43, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Great, can you add a link?--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:51, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Launched
Talk:Take a Pebble

message: I like the detail...but... isn't a little much compared to other song entries?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.100.132.219 (talk) 04:27, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe this is a quite detailed article and should no longer be classified as a "stub."--Nostro Fidelis (talk) 03:12, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

text: I see your point, but I think the length of the article is appropriate. As an improvisational work, it evolved over time, and followers of ELP are interested in the variations between versions. Also, it is a somewhat long song, especially for the era, and with several different themes, deserves a little more space here. Delugach (talk) 18:54, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Talk:Talk Dirty to Me

message: Poison is a glam metal band, but the genre for this song says "Hard rock, punk rock". That is incorrect! This is supposed to be a glam metal song.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.2.142.50 (talk) 07:50, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genres
Talk:Talkin' 'bout a Revolution

message: it is funny, 'cause the song is one of her most famous ones. --134.147.117.229 (talk) 21:20, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

message: The chord progression is actually G Cadd9 Em D (Dsus4) with strums on open strings in between.
Mikadokratie (talk) 14:07, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chord progression
Talk:Teach Your Children

message: This article states that the song was inspired by the picture Child with Toy Hand Grenade in Central Park, but according to the article on the picture, Nash found the picture after he had written the song.  Is there a way to resolve the discrepancy? Matchups 15:11, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inspiration? 

message: Teach the children well.
So that they may remember, and hold your hand when you becometh child, in your elder years.
What will be, will be, what is above, so it will be below.
' may the lord have mercy on those soles, that are within the middle '.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.39.82.107 (talk) 00:33, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Absurdity, due a lowered entendre.
Talk:Tear Me Down

message: I have reverted this page to its last "article" revision.
If you think the article fails WP:MUSIC or WP:NN and should be deleted, please request deletion or speedy delition, but don't simply blank the page (please see WP:BLANK).
If you think the article should be merged with the article about the album or the musical, please do merge the information of this article into the respective article before deletion.
And please always move pages first, changing the subject of the article or the redirect may break links.
Thank You. Completefailure (talk) 00:42, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Texarkana (song)

message: Then whence came the "[p]romotional CD single" that's pictured? Is it not a single if it's promotional? (I really don't know.) --zenohockey (talk) 03:06, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Release I think the key word is "release" as in "commercial release". There are CDs that only contain this song and so there is a single of this song but it wasn't available in stores, so it's not a commercial single, which is usually what's implied by "releasing" a single. These would have been sent to radio stations and jukeboxes to play. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:28, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, I see. If there's no objection, then, I'll go add 'commercially' to head off future confusion. Thanks! --zenohockey (talk) 13:28, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "not released as a single"?
Talk:That Thing You Do! (song)

message: After George Martin's death, an article about how he influenced the Beatles' songs came out. One was how he changed "Please, Please Me" from a slow song to a fast one.  Perhaps "That Thing You Do" was inspired by that. 100.9.206.116 (talk) 23:20, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Similar to Please, Please Me? 
Talk:The Beatles' recording sessions

message: This page is a terrible mess ! Somenone has to clean it. It mixes outtakes, live tapes (Woolton fete) as well as demos. Aldejerph (talk) 15:21, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean up 

message: It says before the section on The Get Back Sessions that cover songs are not listed.  Why not?  They should be included even though they were not serious rehearsals.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.141.185.246 (talk) 22:51, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. I don't know why someone wrote that. There are some in there anyway, although they could have been added after the above comment was written. I've removed the sentence saying there are no covers listed and some covers will be added in eventually. McLerristarr (Mclay1) (talk) 05:57, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  About Get Back Sessions 

message: I moved the page from The Beatles outtakes to The Beatles' outtakes based on the fact that it is possessive (the outtakes belong to the Beatles). I then changed my mind and moved it back again as it should not be possessive. The Beatles outtakes is the same as John Lennon outtakes, not John Lennon's outtakes. McLerristarr (Mclay1) (talk) 05:59, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: I have moved the page to The Beatles' recording sessions so the page can be about all The Beatles' takes, not just the unreleased ones. I have started a major revision of the article and, currently, I have almost finished the Please Please Me album sessions. I'm getting my information from The Beatles Bible website, which got its info from reliable sources – it's quicker than reading the books themselves. If anyone can help make this happen quicker, please do. McLerristarr (Mclay1) (talk) 04:24, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major revision 

message: There is a song called "I Hate to See the Evening Sun Go Down", that was recorded during the "Hey Jude" Sessions.  This song is mentioned nowhere.  It should be.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Snowconeboy789 (talk • contribs) 18:56, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Then add it, with a reference of course. Quite a lot of this article is not referenced but it should be. I'll get 'round to it eventually... McLerristarr | Mclay1 03:20, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing outtake 

message: How can the early recordings That'll Be the Day and In Spite of All the Danger be destroyed if they were released on Anthology 1? That doesn't make sense. If the masters were somehow destroyed after, then this needs to be explained in a footnote or something. 68.146.70.124 (talk) 01:41, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: According to John Lowe this was a direct to disc recording so there was no tape to be destroyed. Anthology was mastered from the record, which Paul McCartney purchased from Lowe in 1981. Piriczki (talk) 13:53, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Destroyed???
Talk:Prince Bakar of Kartli

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
*Oppose I changed my mind and oppose the move. Jaqeli (talk) 11:03, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you're right. I suggest we move Levan of Kartli to Prince Levan of Kartli as it is the same as with Bakar. Jaqeli (talk) 11:03, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:The Ecstasy of Gold

message: Should we mention Jay-Z and Immortal Technique in this article, for their respective producers' heavy sampling of this song in "Blueprint²" and "Way of the Gun"? 96.237.177.144 (talk) 21:08, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Outlaws (LucasArts, 1997) had song that is very similar to Ecstasy of Gold:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q7Q6RZJmEbw  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.143.163.182 (talk) 19:22, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Outlaws? 

message: Can't more be said about this iconic piece of music by an enormously influential composer of the 20th Century?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Upert (talk • contribs) 09:48, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Missed opportunity

message: Metallica has been using this since 1983 as intro in their concerts. https://web.archive.org/web/20090426155725/http://www.metallica.com/index.asp?item=600114 
--RicHard-59 (talk) 09:59, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Metallica
Talk:The Fish (Schindleria Praematurus)

message: "The song starts out with a cadenza-like guitar solo ..." Uh, isn't that actually the end of "Long Distance Runaround"? The sheet music and the points where the CD changes from one track to the next have always suggested that. Daniel Case (talk) 06:08, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Grand Vizier's Garden Party

message: There is no reason at all to spell that noun with a capital. (The Mellotron indeed is a different story.) Also, a xylophone is already part of the collective term "percussion", obviously.
AlterBerg (talk) 08:10, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Xylophone" 

message: I've listened to this song several times, and I firmly believe that Lindy Mason never actually appeared on the track. I know my 60's instruments well, and I can assure you that the flute is, in fact, a Mellotron. I think this is so because there is no apparent sound of breathing in between notes, even during crossfades (which I believe are simple 2 notes playing simultaneously on the keyboard). Plus, every not sounds exactly the same when repeated, and it has that familiar flute tremolo that the Mellotron has on every note. Please take all of this into consideration.
PikaSka (talk) 00:36, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lindy Mason?
Talk:The Hunter Gets Captured by the Game

message: Lamont Sanford uttered this prhase in an episode of Sanford and Son when his father wanted to get married because his girlfriend donna threatened to marry someone else so he marries her but his son lamont is upset that his father got duped and said that he knew that he smelled something rotten and that sagituariyus the hunter got captured by the game.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.183.132.74 (talk) 05:21, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Talk:The Magnificent Seven (song)

message: The article says this song was the first white rap record of any importance because Blondie's Rapture was six months later. That's really rather a stretch. TMS was recorded in April '80, but not released as a single until a full year later (it had appeared as the opening track of the triple LP in December 1980, but had little airplay until it was put on a single. Rapture was recorded sometime in the summer of 1980, the album came out in November and the single in January 1981. So The Clash's song would have been recorded perhaps three or four months before Rapture but had next to no impact until well after the Blondie track had been released as a single. The two songs are very close in time, but Rapture was likely the first to make white audiences aware of the new techniques of early hiphop. Strausszek (talk) 18:58, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for the above. I've seen the claim for both songs, and this is a nice layout of timing. CAVincent (talk) 05:00, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The first major white rap record"?
Talk:He-Man: Defender of Grayskull

message: Was also canceled for the Nintendo GameCube.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nikoz78 (talk • contribs) 18:49, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
Talk:The River of Dreams

message: Should mention the lawsuit involved with the song (Gary Zimmerman claimed River of Dreams and We Didn't Start the Fire were cribbed from his 1986 song Nowhere Man. JAF1970 (talk) 01:34, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Lawsuit

message: Who the hell is this mitchell davis person?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.89.108.51 (talk) 20:11, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mitchell davis? 

message: Does anyone have a copy of Gary Zimmerman's Nowhere Land, if it does exist at all? I tried searching on the internet for a while and found nothing. 73.238.224.103 (talk) 03:35, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gary Zimmerman
Talk:The Solution (song)

message: To render “Solution“ 2nd longest Yes-composition ever seems like a mistake, at least for me: Just because the tracking time on the CD counts 23’47” doesn’t mean that. The actual song fades at 5’26” followed by 2’ of absolute silence with 16’21” of pre-recorded ambience sounds ending the track. To call these 18+ minutes extra listening time a composition feels random to me, also because that part is “hidden”. 
— Flummiy (talk) Flummiy (talk) 09:54, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  “Solution“ 2nd longest Yes-composition ever ?
Talk:The Collected Shorter Novels of Tim Winton

message: The title of the article is The Collected Short Novels of Tim Winton. I think this is an error and the title should be  The collected shorter novels of Tim Winton as per Trove  http://trove.nla.gov.au/work/31774414.  I would like to edit this entry but want to confirm the title first. SeptimusDaisy (talk) 07:30, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
Talk:Cotton Belt 819

message: Thank you, Terrycarroll, for fixing my references.  I'd been trying to figure out how to make them work and then I see you fixed them.  Thank you.
However, regarding someone else's update - I don't think the engine could be called "restored to operation" at the current time. For the last 4 years it has sat in the museum without its jacket and all the flues removed, while they ultrasound the boiler.
I am currently writing up the second part of 819's history to complete the article, but it is slow going. (Formerly SassyPony)
RustyPony 00:24, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thank you  

message: I corrected the build date and the in service date to what is shown in Joe Strapac's book Cotton Belt Locomotives. The last revenue service for the #819 was in the late Spring or early Summer of 1953. The 819 had been leased to the T&NO and when returned was laid up in Tyler. See pages 139-140 of Cotton Belt Locomotives by Joseph A. Strapac, Shade Tree Books, Huntington Beach, CA  --SSW9389 (talk) 14:41, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Builder’s Plate vs In-Service Date 

message: One major edit done by me in this article was reverted. Not everything in the original text can be intact, because some words contradicts with Wikipedia's policies. Which changes led to the note accusing me of "ruining" the article? Ctempire (talk) 14:46, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Context

message: So this quote: "Also in 1993, the St. Louis Southwestern had been merged into the SP, which would later be merged into the UP, which has a policy where no foreign steam locomotives would be allowed to operate on their trackage.[19]" leads to a link of the Official Union Pacific steam page, which mentions no policies on banning foreign steam engines from UP rails. While I know most railfan circles have cited that UP bans "non-UP steam" do we have an actual source on that, or just foamer hearsay? I know foamers have said similar things about "there is a CSX steam ban" DESPITE NKP 765 having operated on CSX recently-ish and CSX's support of Kentucky Steam; so is there a possibility there is a similar case with UP and the "non-UP steam ban" is an old rumor twisted into fact via repetition? Or is there a better official source on the matter?--Xboxtravis7992 (talk) 02:24, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source?
Talk:Ayr Academy

message: A school of this age ought to have a lengthy history section and a long list of alumni. There is nothing in the article at present to merit anything higher than a low importance rating. Come back for a re-assessment when you have more content. Dahliarose 10:53, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assess

message: where are the coordinates set? the map location shows is old location south on the river near the harbour, rather that in the new location. 2A00:B847:F:164:E9F9:D7A4:5E25:EE92 (talk) 21:38, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  map location
Talk:Bishopbriggs Academy

message: *More content and references needed if you want to avoid deletion. Dahliarose 10:56, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

message: It seems to me that this material is undue since there are only two sources that seem to cover it (from 2010) and there is no indication that there was any "shock to the nation" or anything like that. I know several SPAs associated with the school have been trying to remove it, but after looking into it a bit I don't think we should include it. It reads like some routine news that had no subsequent impact on the school and very little press coverage. Anyone disagree? §FreeRangeFrogcroak 19:18, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Here are the relevant references: 
*http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-242417967.html
*http://www.eveningtimes.co.uk/news/probe-as-pupils-aged-12-quizzed-on-cocaine-claims-1.1069540
*http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/drugs-probe-at-scots-school-after-1076209
The school has removed the content don't know if it warrants a mention though? Theroadislong (talk) 16:00, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cocaine, etc 