Talk:Subsidiary

message: Why use a subsidiary? seems like it would be an interesting source for this article. Too bad I don't have access. If anyone does, let me know. II | (t - c) 21:33, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I ended up getting access to this article but it wasn't very interesting. Other articles I've found: Is a Subsidiary in Your Future? Companies can benefit from important tax advantages and liability protections (2002) and Bringing reinsurance into the spotlight (2013). II | (t - c) 18:43, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Why use a subsidiary

message: * Talk:Merriam-Webster#Subsidiary issue....
--222.67.207.160 (talk) 03:44, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion about subsidiary issue.... 

message: * http://scholar.google.com.au/scholar?as_q=subsidiary+corporation&num=10&btnG=Search+Scholar&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_occt=title&as_sauthors=&as_publication=&as_ylo=&as_yhi=&as_sdt=1.&as_sdtp=on&as_sdts=5&hl=en
--222.67.207.160 (talk) 03:48, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Red links in the ''See also'' section maybe associated with the following... 

message: As someone who has just gotten employed by a subsidiary I decided to make my way here to find out more info about exactly what defines a "subsidiary."  I think this article could definitely use some more information about taxes and profits apply to subsidiaries. Fatrb38 (talk) 17:29, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs Taxes and Profits Section 

message: I'm not sure why the description of operating subsidiaries in the lead section is specific to U.S. railroad industries, as the term is used in other industries (e.g. banking).Semiirish (talk) 12:01, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Operating subsidiaries and railroad industry 

message: More often than not, imprints are more akin to either divisions or trade names/brands, they rarely refer to the legal entity aka the company. From the imprint article here on Wikipedia: "An imprint of a publisher is a trade name under which it publishes a work. A " (emphasis mine). So, by that article definition, a imprint is not the same as a subsidiary by any stretch of the imagination, as a single publishing company (that may be subsidiary of another company) can own multiple imprints. --Urbanoc (talk) 22:09, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: As this comment was left unanswered, I proceeded to remove the contested bit. --Urbanoc (talk) 13:18, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I decided to refer to other examples as to whether or not a company can or cannot be an imprint. And I found that it depends on the circumstance May be. –Piranha249 18:32, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Imprint

message: In a world where thinking people avoid misusing gender, I find it ironic that my edit to remove gender was reverted. Yet another reason I no longer edit under my user name. --24.80.199.58 (talk) 07:13, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I reinstated your edit. We generally should follow that reliable sources say but in this case I see "child company" float around much more than "daughter company". However, you must not edit while logged out on purpose: please see WP:SOCK.--Jasper Deng (talk) 18:47, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

text: If you will no longer be using your old account, you are allowed to make a clean start. I think that policy applies even if you do not create a new account, but edit while not-logged-in. Be careful to stay away from articles and topics you have edited while logged in from your old account, as that may well be seen as socking. Donald Albury 21:02, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Whatever. --24.80.199.58 (talk) 02:15, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of gender