Talk:Apepi

message: How come Apepi I named himself after Apep, who was evil and an enemy of Ra? Tutthoth-Ankhre (talk) 22:07, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Assuming the pronunciation and etymology are the same, I was wondering the same thing. As a professor of mine said, it's as if the U.S. had a President Satan! Lusanaherandraton (talk) 05:33, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Wild speculation -  Maybe his name was just really close, like "enter" or "pass" (app instead of aapp) and the scribes he hired were not getting paid enough.  Seriously, does the PHAROAH need to read or just hire scribes to do it.  Picking Seth as a chief god might have seriously pissed them off.  Thats my wild theory for the day folks. 08:41, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

text: There is only one Pharao of that name. Splitting him into several rulers is an assumption research has given up upon. Str1977 (talk) 05:28, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Named after Apep? 

message: See the 2010 radiocarbon dates for Ahmose I, which puts him contemporary with Apepi.  
100.15.120.122 (talk) 14:12, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have the reference? (article/) I would be interested in reading it. Iry-Hor (talk) 07:56, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  outdated 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Apepi (pharaoh). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080602061243/http://www.ancient-egypt.org:80/kings/15/1505_apophis/titulary.html to http://www.ancient-egypt.org/kings/15/1505_apophis/titulary.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080602061243/http://www.ancient-egypt.org:80/kings/15/1505_apophis/titulary.html to http://www.ancient-egypt.org/kings/15/1505_apophis/titulary.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:29, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The articles said: "and would have ruled during the early half of the 16th century BC if he outlived his southern rival, Kamose, but not Ahmose I.[3]"
What is that supposed to mean? Apophis certainly ruled in the early half of the 16th century and he did outlive Kamose: his successor Khamudi was conquered in his 11th year, the 18th year of Kamose's sucessor Amose, indicating that Amose became king seven years before Khamudi succeeded Apophis. Str1977 (talk) 05:28, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: would have ... if

message: He didn't worship any other deity in the whole land except Seth." Jan Assmann argues that because the Ancient Egyptians could never conceive of a "lonely" god lacking personality, Seth the desert god, who was worshiped exclusively, represented a manifestation of evil;[18] 
What on earth does this mean how are the points related?
- Ancient Egyptians could never conceive of a lonely God
- Apepi worshipped Set exclusively
- Set is therefore evil
How is that a plausible conclusion from two totally unrelated points? 2A00:23EE:1209:326E:ED47:3B90:70E6:B718 (talk) 05:13, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please clarify/explain 

message: to say that apepi is one and the same with aphophis. Lets assume for once that the ancients were not incompetent. Aphophis should logically be the entry before khamudi in the turin cannon. Apepi is way before that, deep in the 14th dynasty. Assuming that the ancients were not incompetent, i dont think they are the same person. I feel this is a theory being pushed as fact.
96.72.151.221 (talk) 23:14, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  It is a major assumption...