Talk:Petticoating

message: See Talk:Petticoat Discipline for lots of discussion on this issue. Mdwh 02:16, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've removed the transgender cat, since this article seems to have almost nothing to do with Transgender. -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 19:50, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transgender cat 

message: While the "punishment" aspect seems to be documented well enough, almost none of the references dealing with the fetish/eroticism aspect are properly cited. For example, most do not fit the criteria for a reliable source (those involving the "Petticoat Discipline Quarterly" website). In another example - "Classics in the History of Psychology" - I don't see those claims made anywhere in that citation (please correct me if I'm wrong). The literary citations and the "The ambiguous politics of petticoating" citation at most note that the phenomena exists, but make no mention of the other various claims. The Peter Farrer stuff does not support the various claims either (at least from the information available from the citation links) and even if they did, it seems unlikely they would meet the criteria for a reliable source (please see Wikipedia:No_original_research, specifically the Sources section, and Wikipedia:Verifiability if you're wondering what I'm talking about).
Based on the existing references, the only parts of the article that are currently supported are (arguably): the first sentence of the 1st paragraph, the first sentence of the 2nd paragraph, the "Political incorrectness" section, and the "Literary accounts" section.
(As a side note, it seems the article blurs the punishment phenomenon and the sexual phenomenon; they maybe should be 2 separate articles.) So unless anyone says otherwise, I'll give it a change soon. Thanks for hearing me out. Xarmy of meX (talk) 07:22, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Original research

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Pinafore eroticism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061106132449/http://www.local6.com:80/money/2881645/detail.html to http://www.local6.com/money/2881645/detail.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060615110949/http://www.petticoated.com:80/history01.htm to http://www.petticoated.com/history01.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060427175307/http://www.petticoated.com:80/letter2420.htm to http://www.petticoated.com/letter2420.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060612013107/http://www.petticoated.com:80/petpunessay.htm to http://www.petticoated.com/petpunessay.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:54, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Pinafore eroticism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110116230836/http://www.pfc.org.uk:80/node/179 to http://www.pfc.org.uk/node/179
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:09, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: We should now take the opportunity to merge this article into Feminization (activity), thus eliminating a redundant hyper-specialized article which covers a topic that can be dealt with in no more than a paragraph in that article. -- The Anome (talk) 13:19, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: This is six years late but I agree that this article should be merged.Computer-ergonomics (talk) 15:32, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge into [[Feminization (activity)]] 

message: "Pinafore eroticism"? The phrase can't be found in a Google Books search and doesn't seem common at all. I thought it was usually called "petticoating". Equinox ◑ 23:48, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is not a good article title