Talk:Aromanians

message: Hello. I've just added a pic with their flags. The vast majority of scientists, Greece and Diaspora,  consider them autochthonous in Northern Greece. (Makedonovlah (talk) 00:34, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Their Flags

message: The Aromanians are predominantly Orthodox Christians, and follow the Eastern Orthodox liturgical calendar. During medieval times (around the 10th and 11th century), many Aromanians passed to Paulicianism (Bogomilism), a Christian secte. Majority of Bogomil Aromanians emerged in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Later, all Bogomils were reconverted to Christianity but many Bogomil Aromanians of Herzegovina passed to Islam. In Bosnia and Herzegovina, all Aromanians were Serbianized, frequenting churches in Serbian language.79.112.100.38 (talk) 10:30, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Religion 

message: and , all discussion of this article should take place here, not on each others' user talk pages. —valereee (talk) 12:03, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: , so you block both of them (for two weeks!) for an argument that already ended and later tell them to talk here? Very well done. Super Ψ Dro 14:40, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: , they were edit warring literally yesterday. The only thing they're blocked from is directly editing this article. They can edit here on the talk and everywhere else. I'm not sure what you're objecting to. —valereee (talk) 14:54, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: ETA perhaps you hadn't seen this: Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Aromanian_Website.? —valereee (talk) 15:01, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, sorry, I read it as you blocked them entirely from Wikipedia for 2 weeks, which seemed excessive for me. I have nothing to complain about from the actual decision. And yes, I did see that. Super Ψ Dro 15:04, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: No worries! :) —valereee (talk) 15:14, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please discuss here 

message: The section basically repeats the entire content of List_of_Aromanians, is completely without references, and is silly long. I suggest deleting all but the maybe three or four most important and merging the rest into the list article. —valereee (talk) 13:11, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Aromanians#Notable_Aromanians]] 

message: Please read carefully what I have writen. I do not need to bring any evidence.The users who support the current content should do so. I contest the current content as unsourceable, meaning in some cases there are no sources at all but just abusive use of the terminology, in other cases the sources are outdated or irrelevant. Legione-Romana (talk) 10:36, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: @Legione-Romana you need to bring sources albeit the current version doesn't include any sources. Please keep in mind that verifiability always needed if you replace a content which is still not include sources. Ahmetlii (talk) 11:23, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia:Neutrality of sources says…
“Wikipedians often need to deal with sources that are reliable but non-neutral. The best solution to this is to acknowledge that a controversy exists and to represent different reliable points of view according to the weight that reliable sources provide. Intelligent readers will weigh the opposing sides and reach their own conclusions.” I suggest you find sources for your content. Theroadislong (talk) 12:17, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Theroadislong

message: The current version has been imposed by a forced revert. I contest it! Since new unsourced content is not acceptable at all, I reserve the right to delete the current unsourced content, which contains misleading information!
Legione-Romana (talk) 11:28, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: answer

message: 12>Benevedes, Eli; Lally, Owen; Li, Hung-En; Perlee, Abigail; Piombino, Eileen (2021). Investigating the Impacts of Earthquakes on Ethnic and Religious Groups: Bucharest, Romania (PDF) (Thesis). Worcester Polytechnic Institute. pp. 1–63.
Used to support the term Macedo Romanian.
Since when sismological studies of politechnic institutes constitute scientific research in order to determine ethnic identities?!Legione-Romana (talk) 11:17, 3 April 2021
:The source mentions the term "Macedo-Romanian" as a synonym of Aromanian, you like it or not (page 7). But if you disagree so much with it, I can give another source. I chose that one just because it was from this year. Super Ψ Dro 11:29, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: , stop removing sourced content. This is WP:DISRUPTIVE and can induce to a block if you continue further. Super Ψ Dro 11:43, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Irrelevant source

message: Please stop recycling the so-called sources that use the Romanian terminology of the 18-th century. If you want to support the term you should bring neutral and modern studies on the discipline of ethnology. The page is about Aromanians and their modern national identity, not about earthquakes, wedding or fictional identities of the past.Legione-Romana (talk) 12:19, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The article is clearly NOT only about "modern national identity" it includes history as well. Theroadislong (talk) 12:38, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

text: Yes, I agree but Romanian scholars cannot and will not determine the national identity of Aromanians! I am obliged to repeat the already mentioned information. Romanians have nothing to do with Aromanians and their biased studies do not represent a neutral viewpoint on the matter. The page is not about Romanians and how Romanians perceive the national identity of Aromanians. The page is about Aromanians so Romanian theories can not and will not have a important role in this page but just a peripherical one.Legione-Romana (talk) 14:25, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: So that's why you were deleting sourced information until now, right? Super Ψ Dro 15:05, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

text: Stop reverting information just because it does not suit you.Legione-Romana (talk) 16:14, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: You're so ironic. Super Ψ Dro 17:10, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: , just so you know, the recommended lead length a Wikipedia article should have is 4 paragraphs. You made it of 7. You should move text to the rest of the article. Super Ψ Dro 19:26, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Look I'm not familiar with this topic area, but you can't just go about replacing sourced content with unsourced content. If you think the current sources have issues discuss their use here or a WP:RSN, if you think important material is missing then please direct the attention of other editors on this talk page to sources that support it's inclusion. But mostly just try to discuss things rather than edit-warring, remember all of eastern europe is under DS. 2A03:F80:32:194:71:227:81:1 (talk) 20:39, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Theroadislong What kind of answer is this?! Which sourced content did I replace with unsourced content? Name it! Why did you penalise me? I am waiting for your answer!Legione-Romana (talk) 20:46, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  that comment is from me not the . This is an example of removing sourced content without an edit summary and this is an example of adding unsourced content, again without an edit summary. These sort of changes without edit summaries are to put it bluntly disruptive. Please try to explain your changes in the future. Thanks, 2A03:F80:32:194:71:227:81:1 (talk) 20:55, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

text: As I told you on my talk page this edit  added content with no source. Theroadislong (talk) 20:57, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Content Dispute April 2021

message: Add half aromanian field marshal of the greek army https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexandros_Papagos to the notable list Katakai123 (talk) 15:48, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Super Ψ Dro 15:56, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 19 July 2021 

message: There are no Aromanians in south Serbia less 15.000. There are around 300 Aromanians (2011) who almost exclusively live in Belgrade popis2011.stat.gov.rs 77.243.23.232 (talk) 17:30, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  south Serbia 

message: Detailed etnographic study on Aromanians and their number in the  Albania, Bulgaria, Greece and N.Macedonia
https://ro.scribd.com/doc/28227905/Rezumat-Teza-Doctorat-Romanii-Din-Balcani-Dorin-Lozovanu
Or same study if not registered at Scribd
https://www.yumpu.com/ro/document/read/16099940/populatia-romaneasca-din-peninsula-balcanica-paun-es-durlic
Data are based on the begining of 2000s census results
There is an update of the study from 2018 but it is not available online 77.243.23.232 (talk) 17:44, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comprehensive demographic study 

message: Please make corrections regarding Aromanians in Serbia part. Herzegovina has never been part of Serbia therefore designed section regarding Radimlja and Bosnia tombstones called stecak are incorrectly placed under wrong header. Aromanians or Cincars were part of Bosnian cultural tapestry for centuries and there should have been a section devoted to them under header “Aromanians / Cincars in Bosnia-Herzegovina”. 100.1.65.36 (talk) 13:58, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I rewrote the sentence and now it should be clear that Herzegovina is not part of Serbia. Super Dromaeosaurus (talk) 17:46, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tzintzari in Hercegovina  

message: I think it would be a good idea to add Arameans to the 'Not be confused with' entry at the top of the article. As words Aromanians and Arameans are very close to and perhaps easily confused with each other. Both relate to groups which are much less well known than Armenians or Romanians in my view. I hope this is non-contentious. 217.155.59.206 (talk) 11:11, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Great suggestion! In the future, feel free to edit it in yourself, as per WP:BOLD SuperTah (talk) 11:21, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  A small suggestion