Talk:Paramore/Archive 1

message: Since there are better pictures of Paramore than the current one...a Yahoo search yields some nice results.
i uploaded a new picture yesterday which is very recent from their nme photoshoot where hayley is not blonde and someone took it down. the current picture is very nice but it is quite old. ther was nothing wrong with my one! Nemesis90 19:39, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think we should add a more recent picture from a photoshoot. The one currently up is from at least from Spring 2006 if not earlier and Hunter Lamb isn't in Paramore anymore. If anybody has any objections feel free to comment. I'm going to try and find a good one and add it. Omg starburst 23:18, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Picture? 

message: I believe this article should be merged with the one for Hayley Williams.  Outside of Paramore she has done nothing significant enough to merit her own article.  The information contained in her article is nothing of true importance and is mostly redundant when compared with the main Paramore entry.Princeendo 16:04, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Redirected. Zimbardo Cookie Experiment 08:16, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Paramore is getting really big which means people are going to want to know more about the members. I think all the members should get their own page, even if it is just a stub.
I agree. I think until enough information is gathered the articles should be stubs, but they should exist nonetheless. If one wanted to look up ages/birthdays, etc that's the first place one would look. 76.79.104.118 02:44, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging with Hayley Williams 

message: The sentence "The Reading and Leeds Festival brought them to the United Kingdom from October 5 to October 15, 2006, where they ended in London at The Mean Fiddler" needs clarification. The festivals take place August bank holiday (last weekend of August), so they were two months late if that's why they came over! Or does it mean that they booked a tour as a result of their performances at Reading/Leeds 2006? Nouse4aname 12:23, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reading/Leeds Festivals 

message: Hey, why is Born For This listed as a single? I love the song mucho, but it's not the first single off of RIOT! They'll release a clip of the first single on April 10 via purevolume, which I added to the page, so I think it should be deleted. Omg starburst 22:46, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Born For This 

message: Is there any reason Corvus cornix keeps on removing album covers from the discography section? I'm going to recreate the section with a table instead of <gallery> tags, since Paramore's album information is missing from the page. --JYi 10:35, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Album covers 

message: Over the past few days I've been doing some drastic edits to this article in addition to trying to cite whatever I add into it. With that in mind, I cant seem to find a reliable source for the birthday's listed. Sites like Paramore.org list their b-days, but does anyone know of a more reliable source for this information? If nothing arises, I'll delete it as it doesn't seem that important to the article in the first place. -Lindsey8417 01:01, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Band Member's Birthdays

message: I have removed the wikilinks to dates, as I feel they are pointless. See the last point in MOS:DATE#Autoformatting and linking, which states that dates should only be linked to "if it is likely to deepen readers' understanding of a topic". Obviously linking to October 5 for example in the article will not deepen anyones understanding, and few people (if any) are likely to require such a link. I understand that when to link a date is quite a hotly debated topic, but I think this approach makes sense.Nouse4aname 11:06, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok ignore me. forgot about the preference formatting. will reintroduce links.Nouse4aname 11:15, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Linking Dates 

message: Someone has been changing the lead singer to "Erika Jayne."
I've changed it back to Hayley Williams,
but whoever this person vandalizing this page needs to stop.
Kittenwhiskers 21:31, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead vocals 

message: I think this article needs some serious editing. Yes, they're getting a lot of attention right now, but putting every review and everything ever written about the band is not necessary. This article is double that of other bands that have been around much longer. Seriously, you don't have to put everything. 66.141.164.190 04:04, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing 

message: Don't add emo unless there is a proper reliable citation. The PureVolume category is not verifiable as such categorisations can often be done arbitrarily. --Neon white 15:57, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  the mp3.com article does not mention emo wasnt don't add it. As it stands there are no firm citations for this genre, if there are some found let's check them for verifiability before adding them. --Neon white 01:33, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  If you have a citation use it. Nevertheless vandalising the pre-existing citated genres in the infobox is not acceptable. --Neon white 18:22, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre 

message: I doubt that CrushCrushCrush has reached the #11 position in the modern rock chart... Could someone confirm this or fix the problem?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.254.181.222 (talk) 15:38, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  There's no entry for the song on billboard.com so i assume it didn't chart. --Neon white 23:36, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Charts 

message: Alot of this section seems to consist of quotes plucked from reviews and reads a bit like a NPOV review. Any thoughts on how it might be improved? --Neon white 23:28, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Musical style and influences 

message: Hayley Williams should have her own article. It does not talk about her enough in the Paramore article.
18:46, 4 November (PT)
:: That's because she wasn't considered notable enough as an individual. See WP:N. If you think this has changed, please state why. --Neon white 17:31, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split Hayley From Article 

message: Maybe it's just me, but I get the feeling that a Paramore hater put "emo" in and then cited an opinionated source. I take emo as an insult to the band and its fans.
:: It's a genre of music. Go read the article on it. --Neon white (talk) 04:46, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  If you look, the reference is on Paramore's official site. Would they put it up if they didn't agree that they are emo? Jack?! 19:54, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Insult. 

message: i removed emo from it and it gone back. if they are emo how come it isn't on their myspace page?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryan Zeron (talk • contribs) 23:54, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  myspace is niether reliable nor verifiable and is never likely to be considered the superlative source for music genres. --Neon white (talk) 05:51, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whats with the emo in the generes? 

message: did hunter go on hiatus or did he leave for good? if its just a hiatus then we should put him on the members list with hiatus next to his name.
He's left for good. - JDFL 17:35, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hiatus