lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of Panamanians

message: No need for "Notable" in the title - even if kept, no need for it to start with "N" rather than "n"! TheGrappler 00:24, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. —Nightstallion (?) Seen this already? 08:44, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:List of fictional physicians

message: This article survived a Vote for Deletion. The discussion can be found here. -Splash 19:20, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Vote for Deletion

message: I missed the vote, but I'll throw my two cents in anyway. I would have voted to keep the list. The role of the physician is a special one in society, which is why there are so many television shows about medical doctors. Having completed a doctorate (or Ph.D.), by contrast, is incidental in any dramatic work I'm aware of. In Flash Gordon, for example, Hans Zarkov could be a scientific genius without any sort of advanced degree, and very little about the story would have to change. Therefore, fictional physicians deserve a separate list. ChrisWinter 16:13, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: My two cents

message: If this list is to include not only the main characters of a TV show (or other work) who are physicians but, as seems intended, every physician who appears, there are many omissions. From ST:TNG, for example, there is the doctor who replaces Picard's heart ("I need better focus on the thoracic polychromatics!" <G>) and the one who treats Worf as a "guinea pig" when his spine is injured.
However, in literature it would be best to include only central characters who are physicians. Doctors Conway and Priclila from Sector General certainly deserve mention. ChrisWinter 16:42, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Musings about who to include
Talk:Simon C. Dik

message: Was he any relation to Helma Dik, the University of Chicago Hellenist? --Jpbrenna 19:25, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Now Simon Dik redirects to Simon C. Dik.
I still don't understand why such an important linguist has such a short reference in Wikipedia. Betomg88 (talk) 18:45, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect
Talk:Lake Mendota

message: Last edit - I added link to kayak instruction on Lake Mendota video.FleetCaptain (talk) 23:53, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What kind of pathetic LAKE article has no photos or maps of the lake in question..? A person could learn more in two seconds by glancing at any atlas or road map than they can learn from this "article".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tortugadillo (talk • contribs) 04:32, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is useless 
Talk:City of Salford

message: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_UK_geography#City_of_Salford_being_constantly_changed_by_anon%2Fs - please direct your issues raised to here please anon...thanks DragonofBatley (talk) 06:35, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Challenging long established content 

message: Seems to be an argument for removing the use of City of Salford to Salford Metropolitan Borough and vice versa so what's the concensus then? It'll just keep being changed and reverted without a concensus? DragonofBatley (talk) 08:09, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: DragonofBatley, you are in a minority of yourself. It has never been called Salford Metropolitan Borough, it is the City of Salford and that is the consensus. Esemgee (talk) 15:48, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

text: , far from a "minority of myself" as you put it. If you took the time to look at history tabs, you'd see others like  also question the name of the article and anons...DragonofBatley (talk) 16:20, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Just because editors with odd, unreferenced points of view insert incorrect information doesn't mean there is an argument to change something that is correct and has endured since the article was created. Esemgee (talk) 20:12, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Salford Metropolitan Borough or City of Salford? 

message: The name of the article clearly has a typo in it. "Ciy" must be intended to be "City". 2A04:AE00:2811:1200:E83D:FB0F:9760:B89 (talk) 11:42, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name 

message: The statistics on this page are dated. The page could do with a refresh.  Hebdenhippies (talk) 19:43, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dated statistics
Talk:Salford

message: Is Salford a city, district or town? Seems to have different meanings. RailwayJG (talk) 15:36, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Salford status 

message: Why do we give the pronunciation as /ˈsɒlfərd/ and not /ˈsɒlfəd/? Salford isn't rhotic. Marnanel (talk) 11:00, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation
Talk:Spaceship Earth (Epcot)

message: At the end of the article it is mentioned that Vic Perrin is the narrator in 1982 and in several other places it is mentioned that Larry Dobkin is the narrator. Also other than in some minor specific instances the majority of the document is un-cited.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.34.246.78 (talk) 17:26, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Narration 

message: The narration was again updated and no longer features a single narrator - now guests can select their language, and engage in other interactive activities with a computer monitor in their ride vehicle, and a "customized" presentation plays on their monitor as they descend inside the attraction.  The article needs updating to incorporate this feature as well as any other updates to the show scenes.  Jnmwiki (talk) 14:32, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs updating 

message: The article claims in multiple instances that the system facilitating transport of the riders is Omnimover.  In this blog, one of the engineers who worked on the project is quoted as saying, "Spaceship Earth is not an Omnimover, but a one-of-a-kind vehicle conveyor totally unlike and sharing no parts with an Omnimover."  But is this source reliable enough?  Toastyking (talk) 02:38, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Omnimover system? 

message: Sandwich panel article has this: Epcot's Spaceship Earth is an example of the use of ACP in architecture. It is a geodesic sphere composed of 11,324 ACP tiles.
The infobox here has 11,448, so which one is right? Neither has a source for the numbers. 85.76.169.72 (talk) 23:21, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  number of tiles 

message: Is Spaceship Earth really referred to as the "Giant Golf Ball"? The only place I've ever heard that is here on Wikipedia. David G (talk) 22:59, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Giant Golf Ball"? 
Talk:WWBX

message: Non-copyvio version created for current radio station with those call letters. ErikNY 19:38, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, but if the text can't be copied without the author's consent then it is incompatible with our license. If the author is prepared to license the text under Wikipedia:GFDL then it can be used. Until then I have deleted the article. --Ngb ?!? 09:44, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
Talk:List of Hoenn Gym Leaders

message: who has messed with the hoenn leader profiles i put up, it took a lot of time to do. Someone respond to this statement, their a lot more helpful than whoever put this up.
:I did it, and I'd be happy to have your opinion on my merge of the Gym Leader pages, although it's probably be a lot more helpful if you sign your edits with ~~~~. The discussion is at Talk:List of Johto Gym Leaders, and is ongoing. - A Man In Black (Talk | Contribs) 00:18, 13 August 2005 (UTC)

message: Where are they? They're in all the other Gym Leader aritlces. Why not this one?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.193.229.228 (talk) 02:48, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This is for no other reason then people are lazy. Nobody feels like doing it because its such a small task. I will do it. Blake (Talk·Edits) 00:02, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japanese Names 

message: :List of Hoenn gym leaders → List of Hoenn Gym Leaders — Per this discussion, it seems that "Gym Leader" is normally capitalized. Jafeluv (talk) 22:24, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Go ahead. No need to notify these pages. Just get it done. Blake (Talk·Edits) 21:39, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move
Talk:Air handler

message: This article was merged with and redirected to HVAC as a result of a Vote for Deletion. The discussion can be found here. -Splash 19:50, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Vote for Deletion

message: The "rooftop packaged unit or RTU" isn't a air handler unit. The RTU is a HVAC equipment by refrigerant compression.--Neurotronix (talk) 03:59, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong Image 

message: Another way to describe an air handling unit that uses only outdoor air (and no return air) is dedicated outdoor air system (DOAS). --IanVG (talk) 20:22, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mention for DOAS (Dedicated Outdoor Air System)
Talk:Energy Policy Act of 2005 Vote

message: This article was created from content originally included on the "Energy Policy Act of 2005" page.  For some reason, a person deleted it.  I'm not clear on the reason, whether it was partisian, or an issue of philosophy of encyclopedic writing.  So, here is the information, for those who are interested.  Americanus 19:53, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television/Stargate task force/Episode style sheet

message: I've changed the "Notes" section header to "Trivia" since the contents suggested for it in the stylesheet aren't actually footnotes. I made a similar change to the Doctor Who episode style guide a while back for similar reasons, see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Doctor Who/Archive 7#"Notes" section in episode articles for details. Bryan 19:20, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "Notes" section in episode articles

message: Is there a general decision to change the SG page sturcture from what is desciebed here?
Is there a plan to remove all Notes sections from all pages? There is some argument between Matthew and I (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:The_Return_%28Stargate_Atlantis%29), and I don't want to get it into stupid fight. Necnec 21:28, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notes section
Talk:Alençon

message: Formatting that encases the framed table of contents in text, in just the way a framed map or image is enclosed within the text, is now available:  in the HTML does the job. 
Blank space opposite the ToC, besides being unsightly and distracting, suggests that there is a major break in the continuity of the text, which may not be the case. Blanks in page layout are voids and they have meanings to the experienced reader. The space betweeen paragraphs marks a brief pause between separate blocks of thought.  A deeper space, in a well-printed text, signifies a more complete shift in thought: note the spaces that separate sub-headings in Wikipedia articles. 
A handful of thoughtless and aggressive Wikipedians revert the "TOCleft" format at will. A particularly aggressive de-formatter is User:Ed g2s
The reader may want to compare versions at the Page history. --Wetman 19:57, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Distracting blank spaces

message: What on earth are the "Anglo-Norman Wars of 1113-1203"? john k 15:28, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anglo-Norman Wars?? 
Talk:Agde

message: Formatting that encases the framed table of contents in text, in just the way a framed map or image is enclosed within the text, is now available:  in the HTML does the job. 
Blank space opposite the ToC, besides being unsightly and distracting, suggests that there is a major break in the continuity of the text, which may not be the case. Blanks in page layout are voids and they have meanings to the experienced reader. The space betweeen paragraphs marks a brief pause between separate blocks of thought.  A deeper space, in a well-printed text, signifies a more complete shift in thought: note the spaces that separate sub-headings in Wikipedia articles. 
A handful of thoughtless and aggressive Wikipedians revert the "TOCleft" format at will. A particularly aggressive de-formatter is User:Ed g2s
The reader may want to compare versions at the Page history. --Wetman 19:58, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Distracting blank spaces

message: The number of citizens on left (text) and right (table) is not the same, even they claim it was the first year. 
Can someone please find the correct number and correct it (with stating the source of course). THANKS -- Michael Janich 06:04, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Number of citizen discrepancy

message: See fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gilles_d%27Ettore. Please fix infobox. Thanks, 2001:2020:337:ECBD:C4EE:E184:CBBB:9799 (talk) 17:55, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mayor resigned May 31, 2024
Talk:Starchild skull

message: What is the Starchild's Y choromosome haplogroup please? Thanks.
208.72.125.2 (talk) 13:59, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: This page is only for discussing the article itself. In any case, you'd need to find peer reviewed reports to answer your question, and there aren't any. Doug Weller talk 14:55, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Y chromosome haploroup? 

message: Back in 2019, I added information to this page regarding analysis of the Starchild skull that had been conducted by an organization called Field Reports but the information was removed on account of the questionable reliability of the organization. PaleoLabs, the institution that allegedly performed the DNA analysis of the skull on their behalf, confirmed for me via email correspondence that the DNA analysis Field Reports asserts was performed on the skull did in fact occur. On this note, would it be appropriate for me to at least include on this page the genetic data the Field Reports study yielded from the skull if not the phenotype-based diagnoses? Nezahaulcoyotl (talk) 00:02, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: See WP:OR. - LuckyLouie (talk) 12:56, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

text: @Nezahaulcoyotl sorry, but we need reliably published sources, we don't allow emails, personal knowledge, etc. Note that this report[[ttps://web.archive.org/web/20170827012419/https://thefieldreportscom.files.wordpress.com/2016/08/starchild-skull-final-report.pdf] is by a young earth creationist with, if this is accurate, a load of other problems. Also interesting is this, which we can't use, not reliably published. Doug Weller talk 12:59, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

text: Nothing from Wordpress is going to be used in the article if it hasn't also been reported in a reliable secondary source. See WP:RS, WP:SELFPUB, and WP:WEIGHT. VQuakr (talk) 20:52, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  FieldReports.com
Talk:Wisden Cricketers of the Century

message: It seems like the table would be greatly enhanced with a little more info about each cricketer. At the very least, I should think citing the years each man's career spanned would be a valuable addition. I'll gadly do this myself when I have the time, but if someone beats me to it then so much the better.    — Ringbang 20:05, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Career time span

message: "The editor of Wisden at the time, Matthew Engel, noted that the only real deficiency of the list was the absence of a fast bowler."
Since Dennis Lillee appears at number six, this sounds very odd. Might Engel have been referring to the Top Five, which received far more publicity at the time than the full Ten.AuntFlo (talk) 06:32, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Reading Engel's full article, it's clear that he was indeed referring to the top five. I'll amend the article accordingly. JH (talk page) 20:02, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fast bowler

message: How can that be controversial? There were 11 South Africans on the panel and he only received four votes! --Dweller (talk) 13:20, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pollock 

message: Donald v Viv v Garfield. Either make them all the shortened names they were known by (my preference) or all the formal long names. Any dissent on going for Don/Viv/Garry? --Dweller (talk) 19:55, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  First names inconsistent
Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Maoririder

message: While notability is not a policy, verifiability is.  Did enough of his stubs violate WP:V to add it to the policy list? -Satori 20:10, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Applicable policies

message: Maoririder, has also created many one line and a source news stories. He was also asked to stop several times on Wikinews, on the fourth or so request he slowed and eventualy stopped --Cspurrier 18:32, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Also on Wikinews 

message: I note that User:Maoririder has not made any edites since a few hours before this RfC was filed. I wonder if he logged on, saw the RfC notice, and hs decided not to say anything. He did seem to want approval a good deal, not like a troll who thrives on negative attention. DES (talk) 18:37, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Left? 

message: One of Maoririder's articles was placed on VFD (Kiss My *** Club) and somehow he managed to nest a VFD template on the talk page of that VFD, and put content in what was then something like Votes for deletion/Votes for deletion/Kiss My *** Club. As with his other behaviors, this does not appear intentionally disruptive, but is nonetheless a pain to clean up. I only saw it by accident by checking his latest contributions. ESkog 23:13, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Here's a new one... 

message: I'm not terribly familiar with RfC proceedure, having only participated in a couple. In the event that Maoririder fails to respond what's next? RfAr or are people not interested in taking it that far? Soltak 16:24, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  What if... 

message: User:Riverofdreams was created on 18 Aug, and is making similar types of stubs as Maoririder , and has made at least one edit to an article Maoririder created , as well as arbitrary additions of expand tags . I'm wondering if it's Maoririder with a new account. -Satori 17:07, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: And now it seems he's admitted it  -Satori 18:27, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Riverofdreams 

message: I'm becomming more convinced by the minute that user:Newsreporter is Maoririder.  He's been creating nanostubs, some of which I believe have already been deleted. But see Evil (song), 860-880 Lake Shore Drive Apartments for examples. (His edit summaries for his new stubs have been "I did as much as I could").  Furthermore, he's been adding almost nonsense questions to Wikipedia:Reference desk, very much in the same style as Maori's earlier puppets.  ,  are two recent examples. -Satori 19:43, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  More Sockpuppetry? 

message: It seems to me that arbitration has become our only recourse.  I've started a draft of a request at User:Satori/MaoriRfAr.  Any interested parties, feel free to add your name to the initiating party, and make any edits, expansions, or corrections to what I've written.  I intend to post it to the arbitration page sometime tomorrow morning, PDT. -Satori 22:46, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfAr
Talk:Zak Tales

message: that humpty dumpty show was really screwed up, however the animation presented in this looks to be from the 30's, not the 90's, unless there is a proper date which these shows when these episodes were created.
The animation speaks differently.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidzx (talk • contribs) 21:55, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ep
Talk:Syrian terrorism

message: The idea that George Bush and PBS are "diverse" sources is a highly US-centric POV statement. I guarantee that in Turkey, that would not make much sense. There's also the matter of the US image as a conservative nation to consider. A "liberal" in the US is several steps right of a "liberal" in Europe (on average, though that's not to say the US doesn't have socialists and communists), so to say that the BBC, 20 years of US and UK governments and the EC agreed holds much more weight than to say "a US media company and a US president agreed". Further, the latter is a vast understatement of the level of consensus, even in the US. 3 US presidents' State Departments have listed Syria as a terrorist state, and one of those was a nominal democrat (though, again, far right of what a European would consider a liberal).
I hope this helps you to understand why citing US groups in the introductory paragraph isn't helping this article any. -Harmil 22:05, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  US centrism
Talk:Cluny

message: Formatting that encases the framed table of contents in text, in just the way a framed map or image is enclosed within the text, is now available:  in the HTML does the job. 
Blank space opposite the ToC, besides being unsightly and distracting, suggests that there is a major break in the continuity of the text, which may not be the case. Blanks in page layout are voids and they have meanings to the experienced reader. The space betweeen paragraphs marks a brief pause between separate blocks of thought.  A deeper space, in a well-printed text, signifies a more complete shift in thought: note the spaces that separate sub-headings in Wikipedia articles. 
A handful of thoughtless and aggressive Wikipedians revert the "TOCleft" format at will. A particularly aggressive de-formatter is User:Ed g2s
The reader may want to compare versions at the Page history. --Wetman 20:25, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Distracting blank spaces

message: Hello, in France we don't use Clugny' but only Cluny. Maybe you have the two words in English.  --Rémi-- —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 134.214.162.136 (talk) 21:40, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cluny or Clugny ? 