Talk:Asian psychology

message: This appears to be a rather broad subject for discussion so I can see how finding exact examples to support this article may be a challenge.  I would suggest finding more specific examples such as authors from the magazines you were mentioning to add more substance to your article.  I would also suggest linking the names of some of the important scientists so that wiki users could further investigate the contributing thinkers to this form of psychology if they feel compelled to do so.  --Rushdwb (talk) 15:32, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Revisions

message: The article has good   information but I think a lot of it could be expanded. You could better explain what exactly asian psychology is. You could also improve by expanding what the journals are it's just a short summary but I'm pretty sure you can expand.Jessierock4 (talk) 23:22, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Asian psychology evaluation

message: :The article on Asian Psychology has little information, and the page is very bland. It leaves out details on the subject and the summary is very small. Also it has no pictures to help give visual learners a better idea. Sterney21 talk  —Preceding undated comment added 22:33, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with your evaluation of the article. There is a great deal of room for improvement in it. One positive is that the article is very neutral, but that is partially due to the fact that there is not much there to begin with. Images definitely could be added. It could use more citations and major points. There is a good deal of work to be done on this page. To those coming after and evaluating this article, in your opinion is this an article worth improving? -SwissPuzzler (talk) 17:06, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I too think that this article is very vague, It would be easier to focus on one or two aspects of Asian Psychology instead of trying to focus on it all.(User talk:Ml174339) 02:20, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Fixing This Topic "Asian Psychology"

message: The topic is too vague; Asia is extremely physically vast and has a wide variety of cultures.  The references are the same as the headings of the articles.  The article is confusing because the title is "Asian Psychology", but it uses Asian American references such as the AAPA, which, I'm guessing, stands for the Asian American Psychology Association.  There needs to be links within the article to help the reader research terms.  A map of Asia would be greatly helpful for understanding better the area where this psychology comes from.  Sanwish (talk) 16:02, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I too think that this article is very vague, It would be easier to focus on one or two aspects of Asian Psychology instead of trying to focus on it all.(User talk:Ml174339) 02:20, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evaluation for Psych 101 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Asian psychology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120324120411/http://ebooks.iaccp.org/xian/PDFs/2_1Adair.pdf to http://ebooks.iaccp.org/xian/PDFs/2_1Adair.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:26, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified