Talk:Phantom Manor

message: Encyclopaedia articles cannot read like the insider's dialogue on a fan forum. It's a fascinating article, but it needs to sound less flowery and should not involve vague Disney terms.
Also, it cannot be written in a "we"-perspective. But most of all it needs more facts! Actual facts, not the facts the Imagineers want us to perceive as facts as we experience the ride. Tomsintown 23:11, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article needs a thorough rewrite  

message: This reads like a Babelfished copyvio. -- Cyrius|✎ 16:10, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source? 

message: Has the attraction been turned into a "Nightmare Before Christmas" attraction (like Haunted Mansion Holiday in California)?  If so, is it worth writing an article on this? TimothyJacobson (talk) 15:08, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Holiday 

message: Whereas , I can see where the casual viewer , would mistake the outside as an homage to the Bates home in "Psycho" , it's not what the Imagineers used as a model. According to the book , "The Haunted Mansion:From The Magic Kingdom To The Movies" , it is largely based on the Fourth Ward School in Virginia City,Nevada. ( The schoolhouse standing one story taller. ). 75.104.190.248 (talk) 01:03, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Facade 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Phantom Manor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110720222525/http://dlrpsynopsis.free.fr/attraction.php?attraction_id=54 to http://dlrpsynopsis.free.fr/attraction.php?attraction_id=54
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:34, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . Community Tech bot (talk) 23:06, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:07, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: Aside from the obvious lacking of citations/references, the article seems WP:BLOATED and filled with excess information. Most of the article is written very well, but it seems that lots of information is WP:UNSOURCED and unnecessary. PerpetuityGrat (talk) 14:18, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclusion of too much content 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:53, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: Hey all-
I went through and removed some flowery language, fixed some errors, and added some information. Generally just QOL improvements, as well as cutting down the page in some areas that were unnecessarily lengthy or wordy. Added a few citations here and there, etc. 
Thanks!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by HerrGause (talk • contribs) 05:20, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  General QOL improvements