Talk:Euchromatin

message: its 146 bp —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 83.104.130.77 (talk • contribs) 13:48, 15 April 2007  (UTC)
:This comment was apparently in relation to the change in the article by same IP:
::Nucleosomes consist of eight proteins known as histones, with approximately 146 base pairs of DNA wound around them; ...
:Factual? Reasonable? (I doh'nah...) Shenme 18:32, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: the change is Factual. It is however just as factual to say 147 since apparently Nucleosomes can have both 146 and 147 basepairs associated with them. The Nucleosome Article has references to this.                 12 October 2008  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.156.5.241 (talk) 15:59, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Structure

message: Bacteria don't have chromatin, according to both my understanding and the bacterial chromosome article.  I haven't been able to find much about chromatin structure in archaea.  Archaea do have chromatin , but I don't know whether they have the distinction of euchromatin vs heterochromatin. --Dan Wylie-Sears 2 (talk) 18:19, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Found in prokaryotes? 

message: The Euchromatin can have nucleosomes structures up to the 30 nm nucleosome structure. If more compaction is added, the term "heterochromatin" is used. Thus, the "Euchromation" is from the: double stranded DNA with no nucleosomes, string and beads i.e. the 11 nm nucleosomes, and the 30 nm nucleosomes structure.
molecular biology of the cell, alberts, 5ed, p. 245 Taissirn (talk) 17:06, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  what does the "Euchromatin" classification cover.? 

message: The illustration has some light yellow text against a white background, which is very hard to read due to low contrast. It would be nice if that could be made higher contrast to increase readability.
Additionally I found it hard to make out the central point the illustration was aiming for, but possibly I was just distracted by the above contrast issue. Judge for yourself.
P.S. Taissirn's footnote is no longer adjacent to their comment because it floats to bottom of page; some markdown wizard could doubtless fix that. 99.109.43.64 (talk) 20:18, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Illustration 

message: Euchromatin Peer Review 1
I think these are all great edits! It is great that you've added a variety of sources that are missing from the current version of the page, and it is evident that you have expanded upon many of the ideas left by the original writer(s). I find organization to be a very helpful tool when trying to learn new information, so I really like how you added additional headers to compartmentalize this information under the "Function" section and wrote an entirely new section on regulation. Specifically, I think this new "Regulation' header is a very nice addition to the page, as the differentiation between euchromatin and heterochromatin plays a huge role in this process, and so it only makes sense to be included on this page.
For ways to improve the page even more, I would suggest adding references to the "Transcription" header, as this seems to be the only block of text that is not currently backed up by any sources. Additionally, you could briefly describe H3, H4, H2A, and H2B if you are looking to expand the page in a meaningful way. Other than those few things, however, I am at a loss for ways to expand this page more without adding in a slew of redundant sentences or unnecessary paragraphs. I cannot wait to see the polished version and anything else you may decide to add!
Ed10005 (talk) 06:28, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer review and responses during the educational assignment in Fall 2021