Talk:Millie Jackson

message: Sitting on the toilet is all you can say for certain.
Regarding Wikipedia's policy: there is NOTHING wrong with this article. You have to change your standards. Secondhand and thirdhand references mean less than the story of someone's life and work. A performance is only documented in the programs handed out, in its advertising, and maybe in a review, if there is one. And reviews are not apropos. Leave this article be. Add but don't subtract. In fact, relying on other sources devalues Wikipedia entries because they are less original. You can't gain credibility by taking it from references to other references, other encyclopedias. That is circular reasoning. Think about that.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Baron D. Z. (talk • contribs) 06:32, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: ''DEFECATING''

message: Why is there NEVER any mention of her album Back to the shit in her discography?
It is one of her most humorous albums & includes duets with Isaac Hayes. 67.191.214.158 11:26, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Conspicuously no mention of one of her biggest hits "Act of War" duet with Elton John?
:Don't know to either of the above - perhaps it just takes someone (with the appropriate knowledge, references, citations, etc.,) to actually write it ?!
:Derek R Bullamore 23:23, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: one of her biggest hits

message: :Image:Milliejackson.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:20, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Milliejackson.jpg

message: :Image:Milliejackson.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 05:48, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Milliejackson.jpg

message: This is wrong.  When there were a lot of long spoken sections in soul songs, they were referred to as "a rap".  See the Gerri Hershey book, for instance.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.106.232.95 (talk) 21:22, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  as opposed to actual rapping