lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:PlayStation 2 HDD

message: This article has been copied entirely from PlayStation_2_Expansion_Bay, and it makes up about 75% of that article.  It seems unlikely that there is any good reason for these two articles to contain such a large portion of the exact same text.  As I don't know anything about this subject, I won't be doing any more than making this comment, though (in the talk page of both articles).  --Xyzzyplugh 13:56, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

message: What is its RPM and cache size?  -- J5689 (talk) 22:11, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What are the specs of this drive?
Category talk:People from Brooklyn

message: I much preferred this category when  it was named :Category:Brooklynites. I personally prefer when you can use the actual term for the residents of a city. I feel it adds a tiny bit more encyclopedic information about what the city's residents call themselves. Uniformity for the sake of uniformity isn't always best. I wish I could have weighed in on the the Wikipedia:Categories for discussion debate (Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2006 June 28). —Xanderer 13:56, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Brooklynites

message: How about new categories in here, like "Artists from Brooklyn" and "Musicians from Brooklyn"? SqlPac (talk) 15:29, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: New Categories?
Talk:KMail

message: Apparently basic HTML composition has been in for a while now.  This should be mentioned because it's quite notable.  Most Linux email clients don't support HTML composition for various reasons. Sy 14:26, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  HTML composition 

message: I know this isn't exactly something for this article, but we need some info on Chiasmus.  I was able to find the software page on bsi.de regarding it (both in English and German), but beyond that, we don't have any other info.  I've linked to Chiasmus (software) so that the page gets requested (or something like that).  Anyone with actual experience with the protocol or anything should go ahead and write a preliminary page on it. -Matt 21:43, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chiasmus? 

message: I have removed the WikiProject tag, as this article is either a redirect or deleted. If you oppose, please restore the tag. Thank you, fahadsadah (talk,contribs) 15:59, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Returned per Wikipedia:Redirect#Categorizing redirect pages§3 – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 08:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikiproject Computing
Talk:Greyware

message: == Invented by Trend Micro ==
Is this term invented by Trend Micro? It seems so.
Moocat 12:26, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

message: Moocat 13:46, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The move was requested at Wikipedia:Requested moves, and now that five days have passed I'm completing it.  It's better if you don't do "cut-and-paste" moves, as it breaks up the revision history.  I'm fixing it now, and moving the history from Greyware to Grayware. -GTBacchus(talk) 21:10, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

text: I disagree because most people see malware and think things like viruses, worms and trojans. I know I don't think of malware when I hear spyware or adware. I think of them as although dangerous but not on the same level as the other types of illicit software out there. Instead I think this page should be expanded to help promote the term grayware and make people more familiar with it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 169.139.176.84 (talk) 18:28, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Page move

message: how many tracking cookies does it take to significantly reduce computer efficiency?
Being a small home user I have spent days trying to get things straight.
User:Eight 2007 13 September 07  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eight 2007 (talk • contribs) 07:49, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: question

message: I just excised a large chunk of text apparently copied verbatim from http://uk.trendmicro-europe.com/global/products/collaterals/evaluation_guide/OSCE7IDG.pdf (p. 13-14). What's left does appear legit, though. Hqb 09:05, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio removal
Talk:John Pope Hennessy

message: An anonymous editor decided to complete these sections in the info box, seemingly incorrectly; The article states he was RC and though his political allegiances varied, he was always an Irish Nationalist.Graemp (talk) 20:24, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Religion and politics
Talk:Roman Catholic Archdiocese of St. John's, Newfoundland

message: Bishops O Donel, Lambert, and Scallan were never bishops of St. John's. Bishop O Donel was bishop of Thyatira/Nilopolis, Bishop Lambert was bishop of Chytri, and Bishop Scallan was bishop of Dragobitia. When Father O Donel arrived, his bishop was the Vicar Apostolic of London.  Bishop Fleming was bishop of the diocese of Newfoundland. Bishop Mullock was the first bishop of a diocese called St. John's. This might seem picky but if we're going to claim the name (Arch)diocese of St. John's for these historic figures of the island,, then we should state that the first bishop was Francois Laval, since Newfoundland was then part of the diocese of Quebec. In fact Laval's successor went to Placentia to bless a monastery. If there is no problem I can write this up a bit and create a history section.  --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 01:12, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  bishops of where?
Talk:Kelkoo Group

message: This article is probably a copyright violation from Kelkoo Corporate Information. -- MightyWarrior 14:07, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have now removed what was just blatant copying, and added citations where possible. I'm still improving this article, but feedback would be welcome :) Blowski 15:46, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright violation?

message: In my opinion, the 'See also' tab should be above the 'References' and 'External links' tabs instead of below them as it would help to maintain consistency within Wikipedia and in my opinion the 'See also' tab on this article looks strange in its current location. Xboxsponge15 (talk) 12:12, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The 'See also' tab should be above the 'References' and 'External links' tabs
Talk:Flavor-changing neutral current

message: The W+, W- bosons can alter 'flavor'.  By implication, could not the W0 alter 'flavor', too?  And, would not that, then, constitute a FCNC ?? 24.143.65.75 (talk) 09:18, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: W0 boson '''would''' be a FCNC ?? 

message: Doesn't the standard model feynman diagram for a tau changing into an electron violate lepton number.  There is a tau neutrino changing into an electron via a W boson.
:Yes. I think this is allowed if you have neutrino oscillation. Total lepton number is conserved, but individual lepton numbers are not. -- Xerxes 14:48, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: True, but the caption claims that this is an example of a Standard Model FCNC, and traditionally, by the Standard Model, people often exclude neutrino oscillations. Maliz 12:16, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, the Standard Model tau decay into electron does NOT violate the lepton numbers (ignoring the possibility of neutrino oscillations). For example, a decay of a tau- into an e- is accompanied by a tau neutrino (which 'carries away' the original tau flavour) and an anti-electron-neutrino (which compensates the electron's flavour). See also this diagram from the tau article: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/11/Feynman_diagram_of_decay_of_tau_lepton.svg/260px-Feynman_diagram_of_decay_of_tau_lepton.svg.png Andre.holzner (talk) 10:32, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

text: Another thing I thought of: You don't have to use taus here. You could draw the same diagram without recourse to neutrino mixing in the quark sector with tau→s, mu→d, and nu→u. Of course, tau looks cleaner, because for the quarks, you  would have some other hadronic bits to confine your quarks. On the other hand, the depicted tau decay (although allowed) has never been observed, while similar hadronic ones have.  -- Xerxes 15:08, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lepton number violation in FCNC 

message: Should there be coverage of the history of specific experimental: observations, searches and limits that have been published?
First Evidence for B0s→φφ Decay and Measurements of Branching Ratio and ACP for B+→φK+, Phys.Rev.Lett.95:031801,2005
Measurement of the B0s → φφ branching fraction and search for the decay B0 → φφ, arXiv:1508.00788v1
CLEO II:
Limits on Flavor Changing Neutral Currents in D0 Meson Decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 3065  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Timetraveler3.14 (talk • contribs) 17:22, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Searches and Decays
Talk:Cumming, Georgia

message: I removed the following from this article the other day, but because of server lag I didn't add in the reason why I did it. I must have gone away and forgotten about my change! Sorry. 
However, I have removed the following, as the info isn't sourced:
* Cumming has had the same mayor, Henry Ford Gravitt, since 1970.
* Cumming's Fourth of July parade each year is the largest display of steam engine tractors in the World. (p.s. my dad would be interested in this fact, I just know that tractor enthusiasts must have written about this). 
* Oprah Winfrey visited Cumming in 1987 to discuss growing racial tensions in the county.
* The Christian studio Triumph Marketing LLC is headquarted in Cumming.
The rest of the material is actually about notable personalities, so I converted the "trivia" section to "personalities". 
I should also note that the above material that I removed doesn't actually fit as it's not "trivia", as per the definition. The material sounds interesting, and most certainly not "trivial" or "unimportant". - Tbsdy lives (formerly Ta bu shi da yu) talk 07:58, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced material 

message: I added a lot to the history section. Anyone want to assess it? Ethan (talk) 23:48, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: History

message: Why in the chicken bone google chrome no home flip phone disowned ice cream cone garden gnome metronome is the name "Cumming" 173.94.13.119 (talk) 00:19, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: You could read the article and find out. 331dot (talk) 00:20, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Apparently it was named after a guy called Dick Cumming. This just raises further questions! DominikAnup (talk) 00:52, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:Ecology of Banksia

message: On B.telmatiaea the article talks about it being an indicator species to the presence of dieback, is this sufficiently common to include it this article. Gnangarra 01:27, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I wouldn't have thought so initially but am not too familiar with the west's indicator species apart from most proteaceae in general - and B. grandis and B. speciosa being referred to as such...cheers,  Cas Liber | talk  |  contribs 01:30, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dieback 

message: Another observation there's two sections on fire "Response to Fire" and conservation subsection "Fire regime". Gnangarra 01:31, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah - tricky that. I was musing on whether (to make a hierarchy of headings), there should be a section on reproduction with subheadings pollination/fire/seedlings etc. but then there is still the same problem as one can talk about fire under both reproduction and conservation....cheers,  Cas Liber | talk  |  contribs 01:37, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fire
Talk:Maciej Miechowita

message: "Michovia" as well as "Matthiae a Michovia" References to this include the following: https://books.google.com/books?id=F6irAAAAIAAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q=michovia&f=false (The Travels of Olearius in Seventeenth Century Russia, Adam Olearius and Samuel H Baron, page 111)
Gibbon, in The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, Volume 7, also refers to him ad De Michovia. https://books.google.com/books?id=BSQEOOBnvyUC&pg=PA6&lpg=PA6&dq=michovia+cracow+russia+sarmatia&source=bl&ots=FOhweYZUEw&sig=yIshI4vQEBmS57lEBcUS-kX6k80&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjmuOzz8cDMAhVGID4KHZgICrUQ6AEIIjAB#v=onepage&q=michovia%20cracow%20russia%20sarmatia&f=false
Since some English language sources refer to him that way, maybe this spelling  could be added. 104.246.47.236 (talk) 17:04, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: =Another common spelling of his name
Category talk:Triathlon

message: I removed the Running, Swimming and Cycling cats because each already contains this cat, resulting in a looping cat. Running is not a subcat of Triathlon because the majority of running does not involve a Triathlon, but some running events are triathlons, so that is an appropriate subcat. SilkTork 14:26, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Huonville

message: Every now and again one finds a phrase in Wikipedia that causes one's colon to rise up and strangle one's brain. The notion that the Huon Pine is "cultivated" in the Huon Valley is something that only Groucho Marx might have entertained. I could be here all night explaining the details but life it too short. Trust me: the Huon Pine takes 1200 years to reach maturity. People with Huon Pine tables count the growth rings and indicate, half way past the desert forks, the point where Jesus was crucified. Nobody is "cultivating" this tree....Captainbeefart 14:33, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Waterloo church

message: Paul, I'm a little puzzled as to your choice of title for your article. Almost all, without exception, the text books and works I consult refer to these churches as "Commissioner Churches" or "Commissioners' Churches". I accept that "Waterloo church" may have been a popular early 19th century name but it hardly ever used in the 21st century. What is your reason for choosing this as your main title for the article? Can you justify it and what are your sources for preferring it over the more common "Commissioner Churches"?--DonBarton 14:35, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Title

message: The lead said that "Waterloo Churches" were built in England, whilst the main body of the article said United Kingdom. I can't find anything to support either, but it needs clarifying.
I've provisionally changed this to the United Kingdom, it being more inclusive/ambiguous than England, but of course this could be less accurate. I suspect it could be just England owing to the Church of England, but I don't know - it needs an expert's eye on this one. --Jza84 |  Talk   17:51, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  England or United Kingdom? 

message: Now that the article entitled Commissioners' church has been expanded, do editors think that the title of this article should be made into a redirect again?  The individual churches in the "list" part of this article are contained in the separate lists in the other article under "See also"; and expanded lists to eventually include all the churches are being prepared.--Peter I. Vardy (talk) 11:17, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: In the absence of any response I assume that there is no opposition to making this a redirect again.--Peter I. Vardy (talk) 20:10, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Commissioners' church]] updated
Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Nescio

message: I should comment that Nescio has apparently refused any involvement with the Template:War on Terrorism page (he has made no comment on thetalk page) since I protected it. It might or might not be linked to the fact it is his version that happens to be protected. Circeus 14:38, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Your constant changing of your reason is proving my point, however the RfC is to address the violations of WP:POINT. --zero faults |sockpuppets| 15:32, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
File talk:F-w-macmonnies-bacchante-bpl.jpg

message: From WP:PUI:
*:Image:F-w-macmonnies-bacchante-bpl.jpg. Sculpture by Frederick William MacMonnies (1863—1937), not PD yet. See Commons:Derivative works. Kjetil_r 02:01, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I'm totally confused by the whole derivative works issue. If a statue is on public display and I take a picture of it for non-commercial use I could still be violating someone's copyright? Blah. And it's only ONE YEAR short of being 70 years since the artist's death. Lee M 13:41, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: All images in Wikipedia must be usable for commercial purposes. Kjetil_r 17:50, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

text: §113 of the US copyright law is about “Scope of exclusive rights in pictorial, graphic, and sculptural works”. I can't see that sculptures are exempted from copyright, just because they are three-dimensional. Architecure is exempted, see §120. Kjetil_r 12:52, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Se also the comments I made below. Kjetil_r 17:50, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Eek. Seems I'm one of those who merely think they know what copyright law is about. Would it help if we come up with a copyright template  for fair-use case like these? Dr Zak 18:15, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I second this request. Daniel Case 04:22, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I see you've already got one up. Hmm. I was just going to copy  with changes as necessary, but yours is more specific. Daniel Case 04:43, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Semmerling LM4

message: Being from the UK, I don't get the chance to actually fire pistols, but I find it hard to believe this is "the most powerful" .45ACP pistol. How is it any more powerful than other .45s? Optimus Sledge 10:15, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, you were absolutely right, I changed ".45" to read "pistol" in the intro.--Cancun771 11:40, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Most powerful? 

message: Everything is about how carefully manufactured and flawless and perfect this pistol is, and how wonderful a performance a shooter can get out of it. In the real world, however, it's a rather expensive bad idea. The pistol is cumbersome and somewhat dangerous to use, the magazine tends to pop loose from the recoil when you fire it, and it's not a whole lot smaller than many other automatic pocket pistols chambered in .45 ACP. It's also $3000. Not saying this all needs to go in the article, but the entire article should not be completely uncritical, masturbatory praise for what is, in reality, an interesting but rather poorly executed design.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.54.167.57 (talk) 08:31, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article reads like an advertisement. 

message: Honestly, where to begin with this one.
The "unsigned TALK" madness has to STOP. One of the most damaging aspects of Wiki coverage of firearms is that people who simple have no experience, no reference, no general knowledge of a given platform weigh in with comments like the one above.
"In the real world", the metallurgy selection for this pistol was the result of three funded studies and two published papers. S-7 was a material both expensive and with very real manufacturing requirements that far exceeded common use materials of this period. The heat treating of the S-7 material was expensive and represented dedication to a much higher standard than the vast majority of firearms produced then and today. 
An "expensive bad ideas" is an OPINION without having a clue as to what the specifications were for this platform and how they were met and who PAID FOR the development of this pistol. Expensive as compared to what? Who thought it was a bad idea? When? Where?
No LM4 magazines popped loose ever, as they were held with what was then a new, double side expansion design, locking them in to the frame not once, but twice. 
Neither "cumbersome".....it is TINY and had ergonomics not found on any other pistol of its age.
Nor "dangerous" (other than being on the terminal force impact end) as there were/are no know instances of use resulting in injury.
"Poorly executed" really? Two magnaflux inspections on equipment developed expressly for this project. Few pistol received this kind of fit, finish, inspection, testing. 
"Masturbatory praise" = opinion  
"Bad idea" = opinion
What we have here is a great deal of non experiential opinion by a person that never held or fired this platform.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by SEMMERLING (talk • contribs) 12:17, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: ======== RESPONSE BELOW ======================
Talk:Matt Bentley

message: It is possible that wwe could hire him for two reasons . 1.The fact that he his shawn micheals cousin and 2. that he is a very good pro wrestler.  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bencrossley (talk • contribs). 
I'm pretty sure that he saw The Undertaker and Michelle McCool having sex, but someone deleted it when I posted it on his page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.183.231.227 (talk) 02:18, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible wwe career 
Talk:Azobisisobutyronitrile

message: Could somebody please explain why this article should be merged with Azobisisobutylonitrile? I'm assuming for the moment that they are different compounds, although apparently related. Thanks. — RJH (talk) 14:47, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Which article?  Merge?  What?  This is the talkpage of Azobisisobutylonitrile, you cannot merge an article with itself.  Could you please specify?  --Dirk Beetstra T C 15:15, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

text: I was told here that the merge would be a bad idea. The ikiroid (talk·desk·Advise me) 17:53, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm pretty sure the decomposition of AIBN is stepwise, not concerted as shown in the current mechanism...   —Preceding unsigned comment added by Peace and Chemistry (talk • contribs) 07:07, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The drawing 

message: The article title is spelled wrong, it should not be Azobisisobutylonitrile but Azobisisobutyronitrile since it's the most commonly used. A quick search on Google with each version will confirm this. -- Eugene  140.247.239.153 (talk) 01:33, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling

message: The compound should be named "azoisobutyronitrile" (no "bis"), which derives from "isobutyronitrile" and the divalent "azo"; it is old nomenclature, which is, nevertheless, defined by IUPAC: 
"Rule C-911. Azo compounds (Alternative to Rule C-912). 911.1 - Monoazo compounds RN=NR, in which the azo group -N=N- links radicals derived from parent molecules that, when unsubstituted, are identical, are named by adding the prefix "azo-" to the name of the unsubstituted parent molecule. Substituents are denoted in the usual way by prefixes and suffixes. The azo group has priority for lowest available numbers; one set of locants is distinguished by primes." (Nomenclature of Organic Chemistry, Sections A, B, C, D, E, F, and H, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1979. Copyright 1979 IUPAC.)
For example: azomethane is Me-N=N-Me, azobenzene is  Ph-N=N-Ph, there is no need for a "bis" or "di".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.130.101.232 (talk) 11:31, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Name/Nomenclature

message: The safety risk phrases should be R2-R11-R20/22-R52/53 these can be checked on the sigma aldrich web page or in the msds which can be here http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/catalog/ProductDetail.do?lang=en&N4=11630|FLUKA&N5=SEARCH_CONCAT_PNO|BRAND_KEY&F=SPEC. I would say I think it is really important that the risk phrases are correct on chemicals as I know a number of young researchers have some what unwisely been known to rely on them.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Msrbbj (talk • contribs) 14:10, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Safety