lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Billy Williams

message: I see that this was moved in December 2007 from Billy Williams (baseball player); as the umpire of the same name qualifies for an article, perhaps this should be moved back? (Actually, since there was another Billy Williams who played briefly as a right fielder for the 1969 Pilots, perhaps this should be moved to Billy Williams (left fielder).) MisfitToys (talk) 23:43, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: Move. Consensus is that the left fielder is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Cúchullain t/c 17:48, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
*Sorry I was late. I think this was a mistake. I think the HOF baseball player only gets a little over half of the page views. He gets a large percent of the page views from the limited list of alternate search terms. However, when you add all the alternate search terms such as this and this, it seems he only gets about 50-60% of the page views.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 01:35, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

text: *The links you gave for 2017 still yield 69.5% for me: 42,321 for the player, 17,645 for the others you've listed–and that's for the period when this Billy Williams had the lowest number of views. The link for the full period I gave above showed 69.7%. I had 65% for the lowest number I gave above, which is about twice as many as all the other articles combined. Am I missing something? Dekimasuよ! 01:53, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 23 July 2018
Talk:Billy Williams (cinematographer)

message: The following link needs to be updated because Peoples Archive has now been moved to a new website called Web of Stories:
# Billy Williams video at the Peoples Archive
The correct link to the Web of Stories website (http://webofstories.com) should be:
* Billy Williams video at Web of Stories
Fitzrovia calling (talk) 09:37, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: External links
Talk:Binoy Majumdar

message: The translation of the part of the poem is really bad, what came out in english is not atall a poem just gibberish. let me try it:
 
ekti ujjwal maachh ekbar ure
drishyata sunil, kintu prakrita prastabe swachchha jale
punoray dube gelo - ei smita drishya dekhe niye
bedonar gaarho rashe aapakka raktim holo fal
a luring fish after a fly to the objectively blue but
a mass of clear water of the odinary perpose sinks in-
seeing thus sad scene the fruit rippens in redden glow
of deep melancholy ... Jeroje 15:10, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bipradash Barua

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Bipradash Barua. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060426201746/http://www.bangladeshinovels.com:80/page/home.html to http://www.bangladeshinovels.com/page/home.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
:The root-level link was not useful, replaced it with a deeper link. --Worldbruce (talk) 18:31, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified
Talk:Birgit Hogefeld

message: The file :File:Personenfahndungskarte Hogefeld Birgit Elisabeth.jpg, used on this page, has been deleted from Wikimedia Commons and re-uploaded at :File:Personenfahndungskarte Hogefeld Birgit Elisabeth.jpg. It should be reviewed to determine if it is compliant with this project's non-free content policy, or else should be deleted and removed from this page. If no action is taken, it will be deleted after 7 days.  Commons fair use upload bot (talk) 15:05, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use candidate from Commons: [[:File:Personenfahndungskarte Hogefeld Birgit Elisabeth.jpg]] 

message: User septrillion reverted my edit which changed "served" to " was a member of" the RAF. 
I would like an explanation as to why we would use "served" here, which I am familiar with from "served in vietnam" "served in the military". 
The RAF was a terrorist organisation (you marked my edit as NPOV?) And I am quite sure we don't need to discuss that. 
Would you say "yes, Ahmed served with Al Qaida in falluja"? I wouldn't, hence the need for a discussion. If you look up "Beate Zschäpe" you will find her "a member of" the NSU, and I see that there is a double standard here.
176.11.30.10 (talk) 19:53, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "served"
Talk:Birgit Prinz

message: Reich is back Grimacedon5460 (talk) 09:46, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guten tag 

message: cup? 2A02:908:193:F40:DCCB:596:27C4:6BAA (talk) 17:16, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  lesbos?
Talk:Birgit Rausing

message: At least in the short term, I'm strongly in favor of keeping the warning or even emphasizing it. In the long term, is there an existing policy that covers this sort of thing? Wikipedia pages that are cited to support fraud? (I just received the spam myself and decided to see what, if anything, was happening regarding it.) 
Claudia (talk) 18:37, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Warning regarding current spam
Talk:Birgitta Dahl

message: It seems a little odd that the Khmer Rouge controversy takes up more than a half of the article. This is not proportional to its importance - Dahl was behind a whole number of important political acts which had nothing to do with the Khmer Rouge controversy. For example, she was a leading figure in the ban of Corporal punishment in the home against children in 1979, that children's benefit be given to both parents not only the mother, and that tha 1965 law against rape within marriage should be used and not only be a paper product. To portray the Khmer Rouge controversy as if it was basically the main point of her entire political career, seem almost baised, and non-neutral.  --Aciram (talk) 01:49, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I may reduce the above subject in the article. It certainly merits a mention in the article, since it was indeed a controversy and should by no means be deleted, but it takes unwarranted room in the article and should be reduced in size in accordance to its importance. She had a long political career both before and after, but as it is know, half of the article is about that one controversy, which makes it look like the main thing in her entire career. It is not neutral point of view.--Aciram (talk) 15:28, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Khmer Rouge controversy
Talk:Birju Maharaj

message: Can someone disambiguate the his filmography. There are two 2002 films of Devdas, one in Hindi by Sanyay Leela Bhansali and one in Bengali by Samanta. Which did he choreograph for?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.101.27.215 (talk) 07:55, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Filmography 

message: I don't know 2402:8100:263C:4E59:778:5634:1232:5476 (talk) 02:10, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dance of kathak 

message: WIKIPEDIA SHOULD HAD SPPECHES 9F FAMOUS PERSONALITIES 2409:4042:2094:ACC4:B261:8544:59AB:A923 (talk) 16:59, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speech of birju maharaj
Talk:Paso de los Toros (drink)

message: I'd really like to work on this article whenever I have some time. I'll try to take a picture of a Paso de los Toros can so we have an image and will try to get a list of ingredients, or some other interesting information. I love this brand of tonic water (: Slartibartfast1992 02:00, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expanding this article 

message: Jones was Welsh rather than English. I don't have a formal attribution for this but it's come from a British expat in Colonia Waldensis, whose musketoon is inspected every three years by an elderly inspector from Paso de los Toros. MarkMLl (talk) 10:29, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not everybody called Jones is Welsh, but this one was
Talk:Shawn Hogan

message: The MPAA is accusing Hogan of making Meet the Fockers "available for download."
This is "uploading" or distributing -- not "downloading." That he owns a copy is not only irrelevent as a defense but may point to the source of the distributed file.
I have no sympathy nor do I support the MPAA and RIAA position but in fact in the US not a single person has ever been sued by the RIAA or MPAA for downloading protected content. On any given day any (or every) web surfer, or recepient of email may be "downloadng protected content. There is no method of proving intent. 
The MPAA and RIAA are happy to continue the confusion as their aim is to chill downloaders as well as downloaders, but wikipedia needs to be precise.
Again, in Hogan's case the precise accusation is "making available for download."IDD55 01:36, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  uploading vs. downloading
Talk:JPEGView

message: Surely qualifies for start class by Croughton-London rule of stubs. Have changed it's status. Centrepull (talk) 14:19, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mac Project Class 

message: There was an edit on 1 January 2018 which removed the link to the Windows program saying not notable.  Since it has been around since 2007, I think it is notable... but should a disambiguation page be created, linking to both the Mac and Windows software? Sylikc (talk) 00:32, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Unless it's a port of this app, or is somehow substantially related to this app, then I'd think it doesn't belong in this article, and needs to be notable to get its own page. DFlhb (talk) 15:30, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @DFlhb Yes, I was thinking it needs it own page entirely, but how do I name it?  I know on other wikipedia pages, either a disambiguation page is created, or something of the sort.  I'm sort of new to it, what's the right way to get a redirect (even if user interactive) when someone lands on this page looking for the other? Sylikc (talk) 19:58, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't know about the title. If you want to create an article, you'll have to go through WP:AfC, and that requires finding secondary sources (at least 3) that meet the criteria outlined in WP:GNG and WP:NPRODUCT. DFlhb (talk) 20:07, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  JPEGView windows open source software
Talk:Embalming chemicals

message: I'm working on a chapter of a book about embalming and burial practices, and I've never heard of this "Eternal Egyptian Embalming Elixir". There's no citation, and Wikipedia is the only site on the internet discussing it. It's unsubstantiated, and it sounds like someone may have just made it up to put here.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.185.94.66 (talk) 01:42, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Eternal Egyptian Embalming Elixir

message: Heh! Talk about your stereotypical journalistic measures. Converting to SI (trivial conversion is not OR :-P) has 1 Olympic swimming pool = 2.5*10^6 liters, so 8 of them is 2*10^7 (20 million) liters. --Kim Bruning (talk) 00:59, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Olympic swimming pools! 

message: Looking at the used chemical compounds used, I really started to wonder about the environmental impact thousands of embalmed bodies in an relatively small area like an graveyard must have. Most of these substances are considered to be toxic waste in the EU and their medium and longterm effects related to groundwater seem to be questionable.
Has anyone any studies on this?91.39.113.206 (talk) 09:29, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Environmental impact 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Forever Goop. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  signed, Rosguill talk 19:03, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Forever Goop listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Jim Dean (activist)

message: One would presume Jim Dean won't head up DFA forever - perhaps this article should have a better title?  James_H._Dean, perhaps?  Also, Jim_Dean redirects to Jimmy_Dean the singer, and mentions the sausage in the header there - perhaps a disambigation page would be in order? BillMcGonigle 01:43, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lee Andrews & the Hearts

message: I added some group history content to this page and it was deleted.  I am Yukon Jack - the webmaster and owner of Destination Doo-Wop (www.destinationdoowop.com) and I have sent an email to the permissions email address at Wikipedia granting permission for any and all of my group histories to be added to Wikipedia.  Please confirm this email and then add back in the additional material that I added to the Lee Andrews and the Hearts history.  Thank you.
Yukon Jack
destinationdoowop@yahoo.com
www.destinationdoowop.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.246.24.174  (talk)  21:45, August 7, 2006
Lee Andrews and the Hearts are one of the most famous Philadelphia group harmony artists. They are famous for their beautiful harmonies and legendary ballads.  No question of their importance to music history.
yukon Jack —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yukonjack (talk • contribs) 16:38, August 21, 2006
Jack, I hope they added your info back. Bri4daz (talk) 15:17, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I just added the Gotham label to the list of labels that the group recorded on. An essential progression, since a couple of their most popular songs recorded for the Chess & Grand labels were first recorded at Gotham. 
Bri4daz (talk) 14:31, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correction
Talk:Lists of Negro league baseball players

message: Here is the index of 39 candidate profiles published by the Hall of Fame winter 2006, prior to the February committee meetings that elected 17 of them. The host is Internet Archive where service may be slow. (Here is one direct link: Grant Johnson by Jim Overmyer.) The "pre-Negro Leagues" candidates appear first in the alphabetical list. I recall that they were more substantial than the blurbs on Leagues players, lacking a rendition of playing records as a crutch. --P64 (talk) 16:29, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I have copied this at Negro league baseball task-force talk. --P64 (talk) 16:37, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hall of Fame candidate profiles 

message: Being as the article on Negro league baseball is with a lower-case "l", among other reasons, this page should be moved to List of Negro league baseball players with a lower-case "l". --64.85.220.224 (talk) 09:34, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Since there were no objections after 7 days, I made the request at WP:RM. --64.85.214.168 (talk) 04:02, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move 

message: I think the arrangement of players is reasonable. Some of the preface doesn't fit as well as it should. It seems to me that we probably need a sentence or two at the head of each section, perhaps with variation in the key. A term such as "organized white leagues" would be refined as appropriate in each section. 
All I will do now, however, is tweak the format. Feel free to revert. --P64 (talk) 16:49, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arrangement of preface 

message: Should there be a separate list for players of the Cuban League?--Penale52 (talk) 22:11, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I think that's a good idea. Although there was a lot of overlap between the Cuban League, there were also Cuban League players who played in the U.S. major/minor leagues, and others who didn't play in the USA at all. BRMo (talk) 16:38, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I started the list here. I'm sure this will take a long time. For know I only have years played, but it will probably look better if the teams are included. Penale52 (talk) 14:00, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cuban League
Talk:Roland Melanson

message: This article is pretty much copied from here
http://www.legendsofhockey.net:8080/LegendsOfHockey/jsp/SearchPlayer.jsp?player=18342
Pretty clear copyright infringement.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.252.2.195 (talk) 21:47, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Trippin'

message: old world? they go to chile in one episode!
== image? ==
um, is it just me or does this not seem like the image to the show? it seems like a picture of an album of the same name, which could be very confusing.--Piemanmoo 12:41, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: =

message: um, is it just me or does this not seem like the image to the show? it seems like a picture of an album of the same name, which could be very confusing.--Piemanmoo 12:41, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  image?
Talk:Tropical upper tropospheric trough

message: The following statement...
"In the South Atlantic, the TUTT extends from near the equator at the 75th meridian west east-southeast to 30N 15W, offshore the western coast of southern Africa."
...is incorrect in a couple of respects.
(1) If the TUTT axis extends ESE from the equator, then the ending location won't be north latitude as stated.
(2) If, as I suspect, the end location was meant to be stated as 30S 15W, then the descriptor ("offshore the western coast of southern Africa") is inaccurate. That point in is the middle of the South Atlantic Ocean, approximately halfway between the coasts of South America (southern Brazil) and SW Africa (Namibia/South Africa).
Since I don't have the reference text handy, I'm unable to verify the correct location. Hopefully someone else can. Thanks. AJC3fromS2K (talk) 18:53, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect location of the South Atlantic TUTT
File talk:Rearwindow.jpg

message: It goes into your cupholder, and it need to be adjusted...
needs
The special display send the captioning off to the...
sends
There are also errors in the "script" being "displayed"
Please review material before uploading to wikipedia.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.3.166.111 (talk) 00:49, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammatical errors
Talk:13th United States Congress

message: *This article is COMPLETE and meets the current standard for this series of articles.
*suggestions for future improvements:
#supplemental Senate & House committees article
#supplemental district maps article
#narrative for major legislation
#narrative for major events
stilltim 10:43, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:April Bowlby

message: After much searching I could not find much information beyond what is on IMDB and it doesn't even have any biographical information. Once she is in some more movies and other shows hopefully that information will be more readily available. Fsamuels 02:00, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The reason I looked her up is because I thought she was the same actress that stars as Anna Kolcheck on NCIS LA.  Turns out these 2 women just look alike.  Anna is actually played by a woman named Bar Paly (according to IMDB anyway).  32.212.102.239 (talk) 09:07, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: After much searching

message: In typical Wikipedia style, this "article" is almost a word for word rip off of IMDB. So sad, so sad. Proxy User (talk) 02:28, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Typical Rip Off

message: "Her pilot, "Drop Dead Diva..."
Her pilot? Her pilot? I was under the impression she only stars in it, she doesn't actually own/produce/direct the show.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.44.110.194 (talk) 08:36, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Bad wording

message: OK... I tried to find some references from credible sources for the information that was already existing in the article.  Where I could not find it, I removed it (e.g., some specific details) if it meant I was not going to be able to cite a section.  Either the previous version of the article was largely lifted from somewhere or A LOT of other internet sites lifted their biographical information from the previous Wikipedia article (probably the latter).  I attempted to modify the wording so that this article did not appear lifted (also rationale for removing some details for which I could not find references). 
Please note: I did not do anything with the tables, just to the text - I Datdyat (talk) 05:53, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added References... other than IMDb 

message: S9 E2 is called "the separation oscillation" 74.105.87.126 (talk) 23:17, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Big bang theory appearance
Talk:Casey Dienel

message: If you know any more information about references, such as the author of a particular page, then add the appropriate parameters. You can find a list of allowed parameters in Template:Cite web. —msikma <user_talk:msikma> 08:15, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: Since the article is no longer a stub, it also no longer has any categories. —msikma <user_talk:msikma> 10:11, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categories 

message: I've transferred all relevant info from the Baby album article, including the tracklist and all references, to this page and redirected it here.  If there is more to say about Baby, there is an entire new section on the album.  The Steve  08:20, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Baby 
Talk:The W

message: On archive.org the whole album is available as Public Domain so basically no copyright. what's up with that? when did that happen https://archive.org/details/wu-tang-clan-the-w/The+W/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:C22:3401:2900:A182:5EDE:AC08:3A02 (talk) 23:17, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Public Domain

message: One of the samples is noted as "Hang on Snoppy" by David Porter.  Should that be "Hang on Sloopy"?  And which version is sampled?  The most popular version is by The Real McCoys, though Porter covered it.  Does the song sample Porter's cover, or is this just a mistake?
Furthermore, where did all the sample information come from?  There's no citation, and it's not in the liner notes.--GrantBnet (talk) 21:21, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: "Hang on Snoppy" by David Porter?
Talk:King of Thorn

message: Storing here for when someone starts a reviews/reception section in the article, ANN has reviewed the first three volumes. —Quasirandom (talk) 22:36, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: As well as volume 4. —Quasirandom (talk) 23:34, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I note also that the Amazon page for volume 1 includes a glowing review from Publishers Weekly. —Quasirandom (talk) 21:38, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  There -- incorporated these three. Need more, though. Especially once volume 6 comes out, and the conlusion is covered. —Quasirandom (talk) 19:59, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception 

message: The film premiered at Anilogue 2009. Here's the it: http://www.anilogue.com/retroscope/index.php?lang=eng&o=435 Have no idea how to properly edit.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tapsyhapsy (talk • contribs) 22:57, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Premier
Talk:11th United States Congress

message: *This article is COMPLETE and meets the current standard for this series of articles.
*suggestions for future improvements:
#supplemental Senate & House committees article
#supplemental district maps article
#narrative for major legislation
#narrative for major events
stilltim 01:41, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled