Talk:John Babcock

message: If anyone has any ideas, please let me know! Attempting to contact Veterans Affairs Canada has gotten me nowhere... Cheers, CP 01:52, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Did you get a reaction at all? Extremely sexy 15:08, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, no response whatsoever from the first address I've tried. Since it's been a month, I'm going to send my email to the second address and see what happens. Cheers, CP 15:14, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good luck, Paul. Extremely sexy 21:39, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you, Bart, I have a feeling that I'll need it. The email has been sent to the second address, so we shall see what (if anything) happens. Cheers, CP 04:00, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I would have sent it to the two e-mail addresses right away, by the way. Extremely sexy 11:16, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

text: Great news, Paul. Extremely sexy 12:23, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo request

message: I have reviewed this article according to the requirements of the GA criteria and have placed the article on hold until the following issues are addressed:
#In the intro, consider moving "since the death of Dwight Wilson.[1]" to the sentence "In May 2007, he became the last surviving veteran of the First World War who served with the Canadian forces."  Cheers, CP 21:20, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As for the image, I'm still working on that but, as you may imagine, the bureaucracy isn't exactly the fastest of mechanisms, especially given that I'm contacting them from the United States. Anyhow, if there is anything else that needs to be done, please let me know. Cheers, CP 21:20, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GAN Review: On Hold

message: Excellent work on addressing the above issues so quickly. I have passed this article according to the requirements of the GA criteria. Keep improving the article, making sure that all new information is properly sourced. To anyone that reads this review, please consider helping to review articles at WP:GAN to help with the current backlog. New editors are always welcomed, even if it is only to review one or two articles. You can seek instructions here. I have updated the article history of the article to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 04:36, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA passed

message: If Babcock served in the U.S. Army, and made sergeant, becoming a U.S. Citizen in 1946 my guess is that he was also a WWII veteran. Thoughts? V. Joe (talk) 18:16, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: By the time that the United States got involved in World War I, I think he would have been too old to serve overseas, so I don't think that he was a WWII veteran. Plus there's no record of it in any of the sources. 71.42.216.100 (talk) 21:37, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[United States Army]] service

message: I want to formally question the decision of changing the name of this article from "John Babcock" to "Jack Babcock" because in all iterations, "John Babcock" turns up far more Google hits than "Jack Babcock":
"John Babcock" +Canada = 4,840 hits
"Jack Babcock" +Canada = 688 hits
"John Babcock" +World War I = 3,050 hits
"Jack Babcock" +World War I = 310 hits
"John Babcock" +WWI = 1,500 hits
"Jack Babcock" +WWI = 111 hits
Etc. etc. Also note that his self-published autobiography is titled "Ten Decades of John Foster Babcock". While he may be known as "Jack" to his friends, he's not Liberace or Charlton Heston and is not in any sense "well known" by "Jack" as the above evidence shows. Furthermore, as this is an encyclopedia and not a colloquial treatment of the subject, he should be listed by his formal name unless there is a good reason not to (say, if he had a professional stage name as per above). 
Unless I hear a convincing argument otherwise, I plan on changing it back very shortly. Cheers, CP 23:46, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur with your assessment; I don't see a compelling reason to use a nickname here. Maralia (talk) 04:32, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems to be no opposition, so I'm going to move it back. Cheers, CP 18:21, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improper name change 

message: The article refers to Sydenham as a "neighbourhood" and South Frontenac as a "hometown". This should be changed. Sydenham, Ontario is an unincorporated village in eastern Ontario - it is not a suburb or a neighbourhood of some other town or city. A township in most cases refers to a fairly-large (but not quite county-sized) rural area, including various unincorporated villages which fall within that area. South Frontenac would contain (I presume) Inverary, Sydenham, Battersea - but none of these is a borough, suburb or neighbourhood of some other town. Each is a small, unincorporated village surrounded by open farmland. There is a "Sydenham ward" as a neighbourhood near Queen's University in Kingston, Ontario but that's an entirely different animal. --66.102.80.212 (talk) 02:31, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sydenham "neighbourhood"? 

message: It would be real nice if we could get a photo that is not copyrighted, to put on the article. Mr. Babcock is well known for sending signed photos from his personal camera. Can we do this. Mr. Buckles has one on his site, and think it would be nice to have an old or current photo "here" of Mr. Babcock. If I knew how to go about doing it, I would myself.  Thanks (Pershingboy)63.3.10.130 (talk) 04:38, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, if we can get a free picture up, that'd be great... I tried when I was raising this article to GA status, but with no luck. I even contacted the relevant Canadian government agencies, but to no avail. Buckles is much easier, because any photos taken of him by the U.S. government or any of its branches is in the public domain... I don't believe that the same is true for Canada. That being said, I'm very willing to help out if I can be of service in this. Cheers, CP 07:21, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Picture Please 

message: The Prime Minister of Canada sent the following statement to the media at 00:43, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The PMO's news release is available in French: http://www.pm.gc.ca/fra/media.asp?category=3&id=3147
The Globe and Mail, of which I work for on a freelance contract, has a news story here: http://www.pm.gc.ca/fra/media.asp?category=3&id=3147
Can someone who is familiar with the template of the article please update?
FullSmash26 (talk) 01:20, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death 

message: When I visited the page the entire head of the page was blown to bits by the 900+ pixel signature. I looked at it and tried using the same format as was used for the portrait to limit the size. This is a huge improvement, but it left a lot of cruft wrapped around the image. It appears that the proper signature format depends on the existence of a 200-pixel version on file, but I have no experience with uploading images here (although I certainly have a lot of experience resizing files) so I didn't want to dive into that.
If someone could clean this up it would be great. 
Also great would be if someone wanted to point me the process for adding the reduced-size version. Drop me a note at vanhorn@whidbey.com if you have succinct directions, reminding of what page we're talking about, and I'll be glad to take care of it.
Van  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vanhorn (talk • contribs) 06:56, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I fixed it. The parameter now automatically scales the picture to a reduced size, so all one needs is the file name. Canadian Paul 05:41, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gross signature 

message: today marks two years since we lost Mr. Babcock, RIP :( Tony (talk) 23:52, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  2nd anniversary since the death of the last Canadian veteran 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on John Babcock. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930050333/http://thecanadianencyclopedia.com/index.cfm?PgNm=TCE&Params=M1ARTM0013103 to http://thecanadianencyclopedia.com/index.cfm?PgNm=TCE&Params=M1ARTM0013103
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070926214855/http://www.spokesmanreview.com/breaking/story.asp?ID=10751 to http://www.spokesmanreview.com/breaking/story.asp?ID=10751
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080530205954/http://www.canada.com/topics/news/national/story.html?id=400aa4ad-2af6-4baa-86c5-c20fc824e76b to http://www.canada.com/topics/news/national/story.html?id=400aa4ad-2af6-4baa-86c5-c20fc824e76b
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:08, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on John Babcock. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930050333/http://thecanadianencyclopedia.com/index.cfm?PgNm=TCE&Params=M1ARTM0013103 to http://thecanadianencyclopedia.com/index.cfm?PgNm=TCE&Params=M1ARTM0013103
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:22, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified