Talk:March 6

message: From WP:DOY:
 What is not notable
 * In general, events that would not be of interest globally/that do not have an impact
 on more than one country
 *Founding or openings of institutions/buildings that lack global significance or are not the
 first of their kind, such as foundings of random universities, schools, museums, businesses,
 or stores 
 *Dates that pertain to television programs, movies, books, video games, etc. - this is not
 notable on a global scale (exceptions include the breaking of world records for sales, etc.) 
Based on these shouldn't these be removed?:
*1925 - Pionerskaya Pravda, one of the oldest children's newspapers in Europe, is founded. 
*1856 - The University of Maryland, College Park is chartered as the Maryland Agricultural College. 
*1970 - Suspected murderer Charles Manson releases Lie: The Love & Terror Cult to help finance his defense.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by CPMcE (talk • contribs) 
:I would support the removal of those events.  -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 23:36, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable?

message: References are not needed in Wikicalendar articles. However, references to support listed entries must be found in linked Wikipedia articles and not external links.
In a recent edit, I removed the 1899 event concerning Bayer Aspirin. None of the articles linked to this event mention "March 6," "6 March" or "March 1899" anywhere. Only "1899" is mentioned. Then, I see the event I removed is a featured event. A quick check proved the patent date is correct and a quick double-check showed I didn't miss something. I'm going to add a reference to the Aspirin article with a citation and then add the event back to this page as it is noteworthy, but for future reference, do I need to overly concern myself with a situation such as this? Kentholke (talk) 17:35, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: If, as it was listed, it wasn't supported, then there is no reason not to remove it.  If, after conducting your own research, you find support for it and then add it to an article, then it can be added.  Then you have to ask yourself if it is notable enough for inclusion.  Usually patents and such are not notable because they are really just procedural.  Without looking into it further myself, I don't think this particular event is all that notable.  But I'm open to being convinced otherwise.  -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 17:45, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for clarifying that. I don't know if I can convince you that the event is noteworthy so I'm not even going to attempt to. I feel it is noteworthy as "Bayer" is a reknowned name around the world for a very long time and the name is associated by most with the drug aspirin. It was Bayer's first major product and it is that product that helped make Bayer one of the largest pharmaceutical companies in the world. It was the #1 selling drug in the world for many years. Summed up, it is actually aspirin that has been a major contribution to mankind. If Bayer didn't patent it, some other company would have. Thanks! Kentholke (talk) 18:07, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  1899 and Bayer 

message: Maybe a mention of the founding of the International Faiths United Clobs? To promote interfaith toloration?POMOCMOI (talk) 15:23, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no Wikipedia article for this organisation, hence it should not be mentioned on this article. Jim Michael (talk) 06:52, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  March 6th founding of Faiths United Club 

message: Was born on March 6, 1991 --
Tyler, the Creator
please add.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.192.37.119 (talk) 19:04, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tyler The Creator 

message: The page says that the day is more likely to fall on a Tuesday, Friday or Sunday, but no proof or sources were given. This piece of information should be removed until a valid source is given. 173.68.25.111 (talk) 21:56, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source for this info? 

message: recommend for deletion. --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 17:37, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "the day of the dude" 

message: I think Ghana was not the first sub-Saharan African country to gain independence from Britain. What about South Africa (1931)? Torve (talk) 08:13, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Independence of Ghana