Talk:Parasite (Heroes)

message: We have had a rather lengthy discussion about this subject in regards to the Company Man episode.  I see with this episode that at this point we are going ahead and alowing dual airdates in the infobox.  Can we go ahead and keep it this way? --Cooleyez229 08:34, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dual North American airdates 

message: I edited the info on the preview.  It said that Sylar and Peter would "finally meet", but they had met previously, in the episode "Homecoming".  Peter was even seen to use Sylar's powers while training with Claude.
Also, this was my first edit, so I hope I didn't screw anything up.Fountofuselessinfo 21:12, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah but Peter didn't know who Sylar was at that point.  I think they're going to meet and actually know who the other is. 203.14.180.97 09:55, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Preview Info 

message: Is this the season finale? It doesnt seem theres any more episode leaks after this, and there was no preview for the next episode, so is this the season finale or is it going on a break again? Anung Mwka 03:02, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: On a break. Won't be back until April 23. 24.83.211.180 03:21, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Season Final? 

message: Shouldn't it be noted that Linderman told Nathan not that he would be President, but that he would be in the White House, a "heartbeat away" from the Presidency?Mawied 07:13, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That is an odd thing to say, though, because the Vice President (presumably to whom Linderman referred) doesn't live in the White House; he has a separate residence.  Though, I suppose "Number One Observatory Circle" doesn't have quite the same ring to it when you're making a big offer.  :-)  --ΨΦorg 03:25, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Presidency 

message: I've re-added the (valid) cleanup tag which was removed with no rationale as to why. Matthew 20:18, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It appears the tag has been removed again by somebody, his edit summary states exactly why the section requires cleanup. Matthew 12:57, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: Was it Isaac in the painting? It looked like Peter to me. 137.82.96.26 20:25, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I dunno.....and the screenshot isn't good enough for me to tell. Sylar could be doing it to any man. 137.82.96.26 03:53, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Look again. It is Isaac. On the Wiki page of "Paintings of Isaac," people have added that it is him. The man in the painting looks JUST like Isaac. 24.83.211.180 09:19, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

text: That's what I thought too. Here's a screenshot: http://i16.tinypic.com/2hmevew.jpg 24.83.211.180 23:13, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Isaac in the painting? 

message: If some of you are interested here are a translation of the part in (Bad, except for the last sentence by the haitian) french :
On the phone :
 Haitian : Yes i have the girl, what do you want me to do ?
 (We look at claire...)
 Haitian : Marseille
Later :
 Angela Petrelli : At least now she will be in security. But not thanks to you.
 Haitian : Listen, i've done everything i could. In the end she will have found her own way.
Virtualblackfox 22:03, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Cool. I think it should be added to the article. 24.83.211.180 00:38, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They should have spoken in Haitian Creole language. :) Then it would be more difficult to translate (as there are not many Haitian Creole speakers), and would keep some mystery. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kinghajj (talk • contribs) 06:09, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Where is the "trivia" section of this article. I had translated what they said in French and now what I wrote is in the "discussion" page? WTF? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.250.78.243 (talk) 12:56, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parts in french 

message: I hope I don't offend anyone by reverting this version. It's just that I don't think a moment-by-moment account is necessary, having written those kind of summaries before. Maybe the article could be expanded, but I think it would just be best to avoid writing out everything that happens. Because then it make for very long plot summary and the article will be tagged. I hope I don't offend anyone. Thanks. 24.83.211.180 22:59, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reason for reverting 

message: At end. "He starts slicing Peter's head as Peter howls in pain. A few drops of blood and a piece of scalp fall to the floor, and the episode ends."
Just having seen it, it doesnt look like a piece of scalp, it looks like a lock of hair.
Thats what it says in this version too
203.211.122.171 06:21, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, it was hair. dposse 12:52, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's definitely a piece of scalp with hair on it. There is no way that was simply a tuft of hair. --Kmsiever 14:09, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see ANY scalp link here. dposse and the other person are correct. I'm changing it back to a tuft of hair. 24.83.211.180 14:50, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the image. I must be getting old. That's not what I saw at all. My bad. --Kmsiever 16:51, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Haha no worries. I'm glad it's not scalp, otherwise I'd be scarred (no pun intended) for life. ;o) 24.83.211.180 19:44, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

text: If you watch the ending again, it was dripping blood and a piece of hair that we saw fall to the ground, not a piece of a scalp. Don't believe me? someone watch the episode again on NBC.com and take a screenshot. dposse 16:14, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Do we really need three sources (or even one) just to prove it was hair and not scalp? It's not a terribly important detail imho. --Pentasyllabic 01:01, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well if there was a piece of scalp it might imply that Peter wasn't able to use Claire's healing ability which is the the few drops of blood and the tuft of hair seemed to make out to me. This is only my opinion and speculation though. InsaneZeroG 02:02, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: To prevent edit wars and full protection of this article, yes, we need all three references. dposse 03:24, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Peter can heal, he will never get the scar hiro mentioned.--Paddyffrench 13:46, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: LOL at the "obvious" comment. Billywhack 02:26, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Scalp?

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Parasite (Heroes). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.gamepro.com/news.cfm?article_id=103908
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.49abcnews.com/blogs/television_is_new_movies/2007/mar/05/heroes_118_parasite/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070308092248/http://www.nbc.com/Video/rewind/full_episodes/heroes.shtml?show=heroes18 to http://www.nbc.com/Video/rewind/full_episodes/heroes.shtml?show=heroes18
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:58, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified