lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hossam Ghaly

message: This section contains an unencyclopedic list of matches.  I've added a template, if it's not the right one feel free to change. bluedevil04 talk 17:57, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Memorable matches 

message: I can't find the notes, where are they?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.233.117.163 (talk) 00:55, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Badmouthing 

message: There was only 1 incident where he threw his shirt on the ground.. On the other hand he lost 4 teeth in a match finished the match for Tottenham.. I really hate spurs cause of this.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.172.116.213 (talk) 17:34, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: scandals?

message: There is more than enough material here for the article to be rated at Start class. Govvy (talk) 09:54, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Change stub to Start class

message: In the section about Al-Nasr, all it says is On 22nd January, Ghaly completed a move to saudi club Al-Nasr on a three-year contract. It really should give you more info about the move, and anyway, wasn't there once a page where it gave you info about how he felt about his position at Spurs, who deleted it?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.13.97.251 (talk) 16:33, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  More info on move to Al-Nasr
Talk:Olympian Village, Missouri

message: Shouldn't the history of Olympian Village be written here here, you know, drug dealing, Bad city hall and police entering other cities to collect money from people by giving them speeding tickets and how the government fired everyone and replaced them? Shouldn't that be here?
Yes. All those things should be mentioned. Also noteworthy; ineffectual police force made up of volunteers who couldn't get hired into a real police department, a city government with a collective education of the 10th grade, unfair business practice and the corruption list goes on and on. Any one from the ACLU interested in liberating us from this farce?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.54.252.158 (talk) 01:17, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problems
Talk:Osceola, Missouri

message: The population prior to civil war needs citations. This section was obviously written by one of our locals who still wants to fight the civil war.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.210.51.134 (talk) 03:18, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

message: ...the resolution asks Missouri residents to stop spelling Kansas or "KU" with a capital letter because "neither is a proper name or a proper place".
:I can't make any sense of this statement. Can you explain it? (Although it's referenced, I can't open the relevant file.) Valetude (talk) 10:21, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: It’s just supposed to be a petty insult. I think the practice has its origins at the University of Missouri (see Border War). Grey Wanderer (talk) 16:30, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can you clarify?
Talk:Overland, Missouri

message: These claims warrant the eyes of more experienced editors. The article claims that Overland's nickname is Trampoline City and that it is known for a particular trampoline. A Google search shows that a local radio program brought up the nickname and that an employee of the radio station is selling relevant t-shirts. It's hard to tell whether or not the radio station folks made it up as some kind of a publicity stunt. Instead of deleting, I added a "citation needed." These claims may warrant a deletion. – Kekki1978 (talk ✉ | contribs ✎) 06:46, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trampolines? 

message: Michael and Thomas Schneider, First cousins: Michael; Mayor of Overland MO 2007-2022, Thomas; Mayor of Florissant MO 2011-2019. 2600:1700:8510:8590:7890:4D62:7542:777B (talk) 23:29, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested addition to "Notable people"
Talk:Ozark, Missouri

message: The final statement in this section reads as follows: "Currently there are plans to build a massive housing development in the Elk Valley area and the beauty of the landscape will be lost forever." This unreferenced statement does not sound encyclopedic to me. It is a value judgment, not a fact. I am not debating the validity of the statement, but rather its relevance to being part of the history of this town. Hifrommike65 (talk) 23:52, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  History section
Talk:Purple fringing

message: Although ultraviolet may be the cause of purple fringing, the reason of ruling out infrared should be justified better. Purple fringing is often seen also around specular reflections of sun, where infrared spectrum may be dominant. It is also easy to test with any infrared remote controller that infrared causes visible colors into photo. Attached GIF animation shows how infrared LED is seen by Canon 7D through EF 400 mm f/5.6 L USM lens, and how the infrared light at back expands into purple over the tree branch in front of the LED (if the GIF doesn't appear, click the frame).
Another GIF is created with a strong ultraviolet LED with a little bit of visible violet so that it lights up background of a tree branch, again. There is also normal daylight coming from windows. Unlike in IR-photo, the outermost fringing appears to be sharp and violet and changes into blurry blue towards center. Also, blue haze can be noted to spread over the whole branch. 
--Jarmniku (talk) 18:30, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Analysis about possible effect of infrared needed

message: There are some nice cc-licensed photos showing purple fringing and partial correction by a UV filter here:
* http://www.flickr.com/photos/steevithak/6128164049
* http://www.flickr.com/photos/steevithak/6128164045  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.81.113.171 (talk) 18:58, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Better example photos

message: The Pictureline article is held by many in forum discussions I've seen to be not the highest-quality reference ... basically its "other causes" of purple fringing are all sensor effects, so I listed them as such. OTOH, it's a commonly-linked reference and one of the top Google hits on "purple fringing" - David Gerard 14:31, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference quality

message: (Under "Mitigations")
Shouldn't that be "specular"?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Reffik (talk • contribs) 22:54, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Reverted.  Dicklyon (talk) 06:56, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spectacular?
Talk:Pushmi-pullyu

message: I oppose the suggestion to merge the page.  The pushme-pullyu is a fantastic creature in its own right, had a book and movie appearance, and deserves its own page.  Some people browsing for such creatures (as I did just now) find it more convenient to have a separate entry, rather than having to scan some other page for a superficial reference. --Freederick 14:39, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It also would make it hard to include in :Category:Fictional species. —Quiddity 09:03, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging
Talk:University of Wisconsin–Madison

message: This article is very close to being a GA. Here are the issues I've identified:
* History is missing a lot of the early 20th century
* get rid of that history timeline and add prose
* fix up athletics section, likely trim much of the prose and add in the women's teams. 
* "student publications" subsubsection needs more citations
* delete the MTV's student life section? not deserving of an entire section, but there isn't a good spot to summarize and put it into, if we want to keep any of it. 
* notable alumni/people is undersourced, so we just need to pull citations from their main articles. also might want to trim the list to the main few dozen. 
* get rid of the galleries of alumni. 
* remove "see also" articles that are mentioned in the page
-- JackFromWisconsin (talk | contribs) 21:46, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Will work on it! I'd keep the gallery of alumni though, as it's in line with other university articles and provides a good overview for casual readers. Wikimapeditor (talk) 23:57, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA potential
Talk:Battle of Rostov (1941)

message: There were two operations carried out by the Soviets in the vicinity of Rostov - the Donbass-Rostov defensive operation, September 29 - November 16, 1941, in which 541 600 Soviet soldiers took part; Soviet casualties were 143 313 killed, missing and captured, 17 263 wounded and sick.
The second operation was the Rostov offensive operation, which is the battle this article is devoted to. According to Krivosheev, the operation began on November 17 and ended on December 2; in this operation 349 000 Soviet soldiers took part, suffering 15 264 killed/missing/captured and 17 847 wounded/sick to secure the southern flank of the Soviet-German front. With respect, Ko Soi IX 17:25, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The Donbass-Rostov was the strategic defensive operation in the region. Because the article does not give any sources, its hard to tell where the dates came from, but the Rostov-specific Soviet operation was the Rostov Defensive Operation (5 November 1941 - 16 November 1941) by the Southern Front's	9th Army (Separate), 56th Army (Separate), and the Azov Military Flotilla. There were several operations in that area because the article points out that the Wehrmacht's 17th Army retook the city again later. I would probably want to rename the articles--mrg3105 (comms) ♠♥♦♣ 03:05, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Dates and casualties

message: This was called Sea of Azov Offensive Operation in German parlance, and I would propose moving the article to this title--mrg3105 (comms) ♠♥♦♣ 04:41, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  propose renaming 
Talk:Basutoland

message: : and successfully resisted a Zulu invasion in 1831.
Removed this per comments by User:Zyxoas on my talk page: "There was no "Zulu invasion in 1831". Maybe they mean the amaNgwana siege? Perhaps the attempted amaNdebele invasion?" 
Also rm per Zyx, spellings Moluti for Maloti and Basuti, Basuto and Sotho. If these are necessary for historical refs, will reinstate these with appropriate comment. JackyR 14:44, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The hand of Zyxoas

message: This is on List of former sovereign states; did it have an independent pre-European identity? -- Beland (talk) 06:56, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Pre-European history

message: The infobox includes the 1822–1884 period, the lede only talks about the Crown Colony period, and the History section seems to talk about the Basuto and their king but not their territory per se. If this article is supposed to start at 1822, the History section needs to be longer and the lede needs to be rewritten. Wikiacc (¶) 21:23, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  What time period should this article cover? 

message: This is talking about the territory of Basutoland even though this article is obviously intended to talk about the Colony of Basutoland. Could someone please tell me what this article is referring to. Kanto7 (talk) 10:18, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I too am confused by this; see my comment directly above. I propose making the article about the colony only. What do you think? Wikiacc (¶) 23:16, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is this article referring to
Wikipedia talk:Copyright problems/2006 April 10

message: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winter_Garden_Heritage_Museum : Material is legal, reposted by the foundation from existing text. SplinterFL is an agent of the foundation.  How can someone claim copy-violation without even contacting the Copyright holders?
:It's pretty standard procedure.  If someone finds text exactly matching text elsewhere to label a potential copyright violation until the matter can b  sorted out. If it turns out the text was posted with permission, the only harm done is to make the text unavailable for a while, which is better for Wikipedia than knowlingly keeping copyright violations. Dsmdgold 17:05, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Persecutions by Christians

message: This article has been kept following this VFD debate. Sjakkalle (Check!) 10:18, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  VFD debate link 

message: In both Historical persecution by Christians and Historical persecution by Jews countless grammatical errors have been found. I have cleaned many of them up, but lack the time to address them all. I request that the founders of these articles conduct proofreading on spell-checked versions, wait 10 minutes before posting, and then reread the content of each paragraph to ensure that proper grammar is used. --Lucavix 02:13, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammatical Concerns 

message: The section below is completely unsourced and reads like a personal essay. SlimVirgin (talk) 16:50, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Ridiculous. Depite what many believe, the U.S. has clear seperation of church and state. It is the state who went to Iraq, not the church! Yes, there are Christians in Iraq. There are also atheists. And to say that the U.S. Army is persecuting Muslims is, to be frank, just one person's opinion. Others would disagree. - Ta bu shi da yu 02:11, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Beginning of comtemporary section

message: Arcan, I would prefer it if Christian responses be kept direct, specific to the allegation, and (ideally) sourced.  The reason is that many things listed on the page do not appear to me to be "persecution" from a Christian perspective at all.  Pluralism is not Christianity; and Christian offenses against the tenets of pluralism are not considered sins, except by Christian pluralists.  — Mark (Mkmcconn) ** 14:04, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Historical persecution by Christians#Christian response|Christian response]]

message: The linskl section is terible. Firts off, I had to rmeove two links. The oen ot he Malleus Mallifactgorum served no purpose whatsoever in this article. The pothe rlink was less a study in CHristain persecution and just anothr "Christaisn suck, they killed the oh so great Pagans" site, with obviosu Bias.
At the same time, serious Hisotrical sites DO exist and ARE NOT linked. Ill try this week to find them, and place them in, but can soemone ehelp by adding real links?Thanks.
ZAROVE 02:29, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I understand it if you dyslexic or otherwise disabled, and would not want that to prevent you from editing wikipedia. However, could you please try harder to run your edits through spell check, or have another editor help out with your copy editing before you add it to the main article. Basic spelling mistakes are clearly not encyclopedic, and I believe other editors would take you more seriously if we didn't have to translate and fix all of your edits before making them 'normal'. On another note, I'll see if I can't find any better links.--Andrew c 14:11, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Rmoved Linls
Talk:Charlie Adlard

message: The bibliography should also include the 2000 miniseries X-Men: Hellfire Club from Marvel. 50.147.180.186 (talk) 21:08, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Barnaby Bernard Lintot

message: For those wishing to understand the chaos of "Bernard Lintott," "Bernard Lintot," "Barnaby Lintot," etc. and the variation in spelling followed in the article, here is the rule that I followed and that I recommend.
#He went by "Bernard," and no one called him Barnaby, even if that was his legal first name.
#Prior to 1724, he spelled his name consistently as "Lintott."  Therefore, when describing his actions prior to that year, I used the two T's.  After that year, I went to one T.
#In 1724, according to the DNB, he became convinced that he was related to the royal printer, took on the orphaned son of the royal printer as an apprentice, and changed the spelling of his name to conform to that spelling (one T).  Therefore, he probably didn't have a very legal reason for the change.
#References to him in other literature come from the works of Cibber, Gay, and especially Pope, and they invariably use the double T spelling.
Anyway, there is no rule, but this is the rule I followed, so there is no need to make it consistent throughout, so long as redirects work.  Geogre 14:54, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: T or Two?
Talk:Jim Baikie

message: When did he start - which twenty years is referred to in the opening sentance ? -- Beardo 17:25, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Start

message: The obituary found here lists 21 December, 2017. DrJohnnyDiablo (talk) 06:04, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: * Nevermind. Apparently, that was a different Jim Baikie. DrJohnnyDiablo (talk) 06:10, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Death date
Talk:List of accelerators in particle physics

message: (talk) 20:09, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Cyclotrons, synchrotrons

message: I don't know much about particle accelerators, but I think that UNLV has a particle accelerator due to come online this year. I don't know what type it is, or I'd add it.
* http://web.unlv.edu/accelerator/index.html
* https://www.facebook.com/LVGEA/posts/10151676847203854
* http://www.unlvrebelyell.com/2013/05/06/accelerating-unlvs-research-mission/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:A601:2CD:FC00:8472:3A7A:ADFF:6E3D (talk) 01:15, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible additions

message: There was an entry in the cyclotron table called "Isochronous Cyclotron", supposedly at LBNL.  There has never been any cylotron there  with the parameters in the table.  I checked  the reference (Chau and Tigner), and it appears that was a summary of the capabilities of several different isochronous cyclotrons, starting with one at LBNL.  I removed the entry and the footnote.KaturianKaturian 21:30, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Isochronous cyclotron"?
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject User scripts/Scripts/CleanupTab.js

message: Kind of ironic that the project page seems to require some clean up....  Andrewski 17:05, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion 

message: How about compatibility with Vector skin? --Smihael (talk) 12:35, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vector 

message: Hello! This script has been detected as using deprecated parameters that need to be replaced with the updated version. Examples include addOnloadHook( ... ) needs to be replaced with $( ... ) or $( function() { ... } ) (depending on use);  all wgGlobalVariables need to be properly gotten with mw.config.get( 'wgGlobalVariable' ); and addPortletLink needs to be called with mw.util.addPortletLink.  Please see MW:ResourceLoader/Legacy JavaScript for details.  Thank you. —  (e • t • c) 22:35, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legacy JavaScript
Talk:Mark Buckingham (comic book artist)

message: Probably need to add his inking (listed as 'Finishes') of Chris Bachalo's work on Ghost Rider 2099 1-3, more finishes for 4, and taking over the role of both pencils/inks for 5, leaving then returning for issue 9. Why is this of encyclopedic interest? Contributes to the background to Buckingham taking on pencils, as well as relates his experience with Chris Bachalo, which continued with the comic Generation X. Both their styles followed a progression from gritty, realistic proportioned characters to manga inspired exaggeration, though Mark continues with a mix of both in Fables. 131.217.6.6 (talk) 05:38, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Other Work
Talk:Charlotte Sometimes (novel)

message: The post-punk band The Cure wrote a song entitled "Charlotte Sometimes" which the band released as a single in 1984. They have regularly played the song live in concerts ever since. Robert Smith has said that the song was based on this book.
Lyrics to the song can be found here:
:Yes, there is already an article about it at Charlotte Sometimes (song). Nekura 20:11, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Despite the spoiler warning, I don't think this article adequately describes the ending of the book. (It's my understanding that Clare dies in the flu epidemic and that someone from 1918 is related to one of the "modern" girls, but I haven't read the book & don't know the details.) Since there is a spoiler warning, and it doesn't seem like anyone is going to read that synopsis without wanting to know the full story, it seems coy to leave off exactly what did happen to Clare and Emily.
It also seems a little silly to have a "needs sources" bit listed, when the novel itself is clearly the source for most of what is written here. It would help if someone made a list of the particular items that need sources. 4.131.33.43 07:58, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ending
Talk:Vatican pornography conspiracy

message: I guess this could do with a few links to blogs, or bulletin boards which carry it. I shall try to do this when I get time.
Cialovesyou 15:20, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Blogs and bulletin boards aren't legitimate references. — Phil Welch (t) (c) 02:23, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Sorry, I think the Snopes and Straight Dope links are legitimate references, but policy is extremely clear that only *reliable* sources are acceptable. Blogs (except in extreme circumstances) and bulletin boards don't qualify. — Phil Welch (t) (c) 07:34, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: This page needs a few links

message: I believe this topic is worthy of a serious treatment, so I've made some badly-needed edits & removed the  notice Philwelch put on the main page. However, it is only to provide some time for interested parties to make something of this article. I'd like a period of seven days to be given to this article, during which time more improvements need to be made. If no substantial edits are made, then yours truly will list this article in WP:AfD for deletion, & I fully expect that the folks there will likely vote to delete it before the voting period has ended. The clock is ticking: please get to work & make something of this opportunity. -- llywrch 02:30, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Waiting for deletion 

message: Per the points brought up on the AfD, I vote that the content be merged with Vatican Library, with this being a redirect. -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. Think out loud 01:10, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. — Philwelch t 01:12, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:John M. Burns

message: These Italian and Danish sites plot a birth year at 1938.  MURGH disc. 04:56, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Birth year
Talk:United Nations Foundation

message: Please avoid any use of the first-person article.  This page seems to have been either copied and pasted from the organization's website, or written by a press officer.  Any uses of "our", "we", and other worlds like that need to go (I think I got most or all of them).  Also, this page needs to be put into fewer buzz-words.--ZachPruckowski 15:35, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: First person