lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Al-Shawkani

message: Is this quote correct?
"Islam is unanimous about fighting the unbelievers and forcing them to Islam or submitting and paying Jizya tax (protection money for the Jews and the Christians only) or being killed. The verse about forgiving them are abrogated unanimously by the obligation of fighting in any case".
Al-Shawkani
76.95.87.42 (talk) 00:45, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Question
Talk:Non-Stop (novel)

message: Come on theres gotta be more someone can add to this page!
this is one of the great sci fi novels!
:I might be able to do something about this if I can find the time.  I only read the book last year. Even so, I'll need to go back to refresh my memory because I think there are some small inaccuracies in the article.  Astronaut 18:45, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

message: The Brian Aldiss page says that this was published in the US under a different title, which gives away part of the plot. What was that ? -- Beardo 04:16, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not really a spoiler, as it's revealed that they live in corridors and cabins, the ground is called the deck within the first few pages, and the "myth" of the world/ship is also discussed briefly in the first part of the novel. 77.98.223.49 (talk) 08:47, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: In terms of literaray innovation and notable scenes in the novel, should there be a mention of the scene in which Complain is kidnapped by the 'Giants' and then briefly interrogated by an insane psychic rabbit? (Note to moderators: This actually happens!) Brakespeare22 (talk) 03:27, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Psychic Interrogation Scene
Talk:Adobogiona

message: The current text is conflicting with other sources in Wikipedia saying that she was the daughter of Deiotarus and the wife of Brogitarus. Was there another family member of the same name?--Hyphantes (talk) 03:24, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I fixed it, but someone else might want to check it.--Hyphantes (talk) 16:37, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflicting Informations
Template talk:AWBUser

message: This template seems to have a bug when there is a space in the user name:  gives . --Salix alba (talk) 18:49, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Now fixed. It needed and extra urlencode. --Salix alba (talk) 18:51, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bug with a space in user names 

message: Seeing as how an applicants' edit count needs to be checked prior to approval, wouldn't it make sense to include an edit count button on this template? Something like --VectorPotentialTalk 12:36, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Something like this: --VectorPotentialTalk 12:43, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit counter 

message: Upon hitting "total" we get...
:Sorry, the old query.php interface has been shut down as of 25 August, 2008 in favor of MediaWiki's native machine API.
:Please update your scripts to use the current interfaces, which are actively maintained..
:If you're interested in creating an adaptor interface to translate old queries to the new backend, please contact the folks on the MediaWiki-API mailing list.
Jclemens (talk) 05:58, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Total is broke
Talk:Blohm & Voss BV 238

message: I don't have a copy to reference, but I'm pretty sure that Pierre Clostermann's The Big Show claims that he was involved in the attack on the BV 238. I don't recall him claiming to have shot it, only to have been there, although the implication of more is left to the reader. Does anyone have a copy handy to check this? Maury Markowitz (talk) 00:24, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pierre Clostermann involved?
Talk:Natural History (Pliny)

message: In the external-links section you can read:
:Second English translation, by John Bostock and Henry Thomas Riley, 1855;  complete, with index
However, Bostock's work does not seem to be complete. In fact, book VII ends with chapter 61, while Pliny wrote 87 chapters, as you can see in the original version on Perseus. Galtzaile (talk) 17:03, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Links: "complete" 

message: Why does the text repeatedly call it "Naturalis Historia", even in the caption right next to the picture of the cover which clearly reads "Naturalis Historiæ"? 86.26.33.25 (talk) 20:32, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Latin Name 

message: This is not so much a problem with the article itself, but more so with the subject matter, which I’ve tried to research for sometime and have come up with nothing; In which book/volume of Naturalis Historia is the Artibatirae mentioned? 97.88.217.246 (talk) 05:57, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Artibatirae
Talk:Kashmiriyat

message: , In order to support this categorization, you need to provide a source that says that there is nationalism within Pakistan called "Kashmiriyat". -- Kautilya3 (talk) 16:44, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kashmiriyat in Pakistan? 
Talk:Diamond/Archive 3

message: I protected the version that existed before the edit war, which is exactly what the policy says.  I haven't made an edit to the article related to this, so haven't broken any policy.  And as for protecting my "preferred version", since when do I prefer BC/AD?  I prefer BCE/CE.  In any case, the protection template clearly states that protection doesn't endorse the current version.  --brian0918™ 23:34, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Brian, while I see your protection was in good faith, I'm afraid it was technically against protection policy. To quote the relevant passage: "Admins should not protect pages which they have been involved with (involvement includes making substantive edits to the page or expressing opinions about the article on the talk page)." Emphasis mine. You wanted to cool down the edit war, and while I'll note that the war was actually over until CrucifiedChrist's arrival, your intent was admirable. But after doing so you jumped into the debate to declare BC/AD to be the the best option based on your own opinion and declared the argument to be over (facetiously or not, it's not helpful). I'm not about to raise a stink over this relatively minor infraction, but I think it would be best if you could either lift the protection or withdraw yourself from the debate. FWIW I think you're a good admin, so please don't take this personally. -- Hadal 04:43, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposal to change BC/AD to BCE/CE (CONT)
Talk:The Kings School, Parramatta

message: SupportI support the proposed merge. The new article should be called The Kings School, Paramatta (that is the label that the school itself uses and would be most appropriate.
mpearse 23:30, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have redirected this article to The King's School, Sydney as all the information here was already in the main article. Discussion on a possible page move should be taken up on Talk:The King's School, Sydney. Cheers -- Ianblair23 (talk) 07:30, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with [[The King's School, Sydney]]
Talk:Paradise of the Blind

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=-FiVDAAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=A+Study+Guide+for+Duong+Thu+Huong%27s+%22Paradise+of+the+Blind%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjDlq3ezK3QAhVD2xoKHcLEALkQ6AEIJDAA#v=onepage&q=A%20Study%20Guide%20for%20Duong%20Thu%20Huong%27s%20%22Paradise%20of%20the%20Blind%22&f=false. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Minima© (talk) 15:38, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Template talk:Lutheranism

message: Here is a Lutheranism Template I made, It will link all the Lutheranism articles together nicely since there is nothing to do that now. Josh777 23:31, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template 

message: The "Organizations" section lists only the 3 main Lutheran denominations in the USA, while ignoring Lutheranism everywhere else.  This is preposterous, considering the global span of Lutheranism.  The established state churches in Scandinavia surely deserve some mention due to their importance in Lutheran history.  If there is concern over too long a list, then it should be limited only to the international Lutheran bodies.  Just about all the major denominations belong to one of the int'l bodies, and they provide a broad ideological and theological spectrum.  Fishal 01:58, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: US bias

message: The order should be as follows:
Christianity
Roman Catholicism
Protestant Reformation
This is the chronological order.
:Agreed
:jackturner3 21:54, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-Arrange '''Beginnings''' section 

message: Shouldn't Lars Levi Læstadius and Laestadianism have a place on this template?  It's a fairly important current within Lutheranism.  Fishal 16:35, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I find it a little bit strange that still active movements are listed under history. The template would require serious reconsideration and definately a shift from its bias toward history. --Isidorus Finn (talk) 18:58, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I put the movements in the order in which they originated. The last seven on the "history" list are still active movements. In English, the word history doesn't preclude something from being both historical and still on-going. A good example would be the history of the women's rights movement. Women already assert the right to vote and to work, but women are still in the process of asserting more equality in society overall.--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 23:10, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Laestadianism

message: The links to Divine Service and the Lutheran Calendar of Saints are well and good, but why the links to the North American hymnals, and no others?  There's no way that all the international hymnbooks, in every language, could fit on the template, so the American ones don't belong here.  Fishal 13:21, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  US focus on hymnals
Talk:Churchill (cocktail)

message: This article is on the Mixed Drinks WikiProject to-do list to be merged with several other related articles, all created by the same bartender. This will be completed as soon as someone has the chance to complete the process.
It is important that this page be kept and turned into a redirect to preserve the edit history of this drink for GFDL license requirements. Thank you. --Willscrlt (Talk·Cntrb) 14:35, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Rusty nail (cocktail)

message: Though that may have been sold to the photographer as a rusty nail it does not match the descriptions in the WP article or various cocktail books. In particular the displayed red fruits (cherries?) do not belong in the drink. A real Rusty Nail should look like  or .--Kmhkmh (talk) 08:44, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Update: The picture in question was removed in 2016, and a better picture was put into the article in 2018. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 18:09, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Misleading picture

message: : GenQuest "scribble" 21:48, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo request
Talk:Snowmass (ski area)

message: should the infobox be changed to "infobox ski area" instead of the custom made one there is now?  Not that the current one isn't good, but it doesn't conform to the rest of the ski area articles.  Jameschipmunk 23:37, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The trail map needs to be updated! Elium2 (talk) 13:37, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updating
Talk:Golden Doublet

message: This article is on the Mixed Drinks WikiProject to-do list to be merged with several other related articles, all created by the same bartender. This will be completed as soon as someone has the chance to complete the process.
It is important that this page be kept and turned into a redirect to preserve the edit history of this drink for GFDL license requirements. Thank you. --Willscrlt (Talk·Cntrb) 14:47, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Moonwalk cocktail

message: This article is on the Mixed Drinks WikiProject to-do list to be merged with several other related articles, all created by the same bartender. This will be completed as soon as someone has the chance to complete the process.
It is important that this page be kept and turned into a redirect to preserve the edit history of this drink for GFDL license requirements. Thank you. --Willscrlt (Talk·Cntrb) 14:59, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Panthera youngi

message: The reference implies that the remains were found somewhere close to Yukon, whereas the text mentions NE China. Is this because of tectonic plate movement over the course of 350,000 years, or am I reading too much into this?  freshofftheufoΓΛĿЌ  23:41, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, the title of the reference refers to Panthera atrox (the American lion), who was found near Yukon. A part of the refered article has info on Panthera youngi. Peter Maas 15:47, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah! I see, thanks.  freshofftheufoΓΛĿЌ  16:19, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

text: Reminds me of Panthera combaszoe. Leo1pard (talk) 16:17, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Location

message: Leo1pard (talk) 16:17, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page views
Talk:Savoy Affair

message: This article is on the Mixed Drinks WikiProject to-do list to be merged with several other related articles, all 
created by the same bartender. This will be completed as soon as someone has the chance to complete the process.
It is important that this page be kept and turned into a redirect to preserve the edit history of this drink for 
GFDL license requirements. Thank you. --Willscrlt (Talk·Cntrb) 15:25, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Fleetwood Park Secondary School

message: I removed the information about the class schedule and important upcoming dates because it does not seem relevant for an encyclopedia article. Khatru2 23:43, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relevant information 

message: I am giving this Start / Low. For C-class it simply needs expansion, see WP:WPSCH/AG#S for ideas on missing sections. Much of the reference material is from the school website (a primary source), more material from secondary sources is needed as that is what Wikipedia articles should be based on per WP:V / WP:N. Camaron ·  Christopher · talk 20:40, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment 

message: The section on the school's theatre company may not be of enough importance as of now to merit its own section. If the precedent is set based on this, sections dedicated to dance, music, etc. may also be required. Electron2.0 (talk) 07:48, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dragon Tales Theatre Company section
Talk:Irwin Belk Complex

message: The Irwin Belk Complex and Irwin Belk Stadium are two different stadiums in two different towns. Merging them makes no sense. BobbyAFC (talk) 01:16, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger?
Talk:Prince of Wales (cocktail)

message: This article is on the Mixed Drinks WikiProject to-do list to be merged with several other related articles, all 
created by the same bartender. This will be completed as soon as someone has the chance to complete the process.
It is important that this page be kept and turned into a redirect to preserve the edit history of this drink for 
GFDL license requirements. Thank you. --Willscrlt (Talk·Cntrb) 15:22, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Santa Cruz Department (Bolivia)

message: Why is it called Santa Cruz department. I would think Santa Cruz is a region or state or province. Department doesnt sound right. Any opinion on this.Docku (talk) 20:19, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Bolivia consists of nine (Spanish:) "departamentos", one of them is Santa Cruz. -- Meister (talk) 18:50, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the reply. I am just wondering that a direct translation of Spanish "Departmentos" to English "Departments" may not reflect the real meaning. In other words, Is there any difference in meaning between Spanish "Departmentos" and English "State" or "Province".Docku (talk) 19:04, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

text: A "departamento" in Bolivia is a subnational entity, and is comparable to a "State" in the USA or other countries. -- Meister (talk) 19:25, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That helps. Wouldnt it be appropriate then to call it a state than department. Department in English should mean a small entity of a big organisation (like History Department in a University for example) rather than a geographical denomination.Docku (talk) 19:44, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: Santa Cruz has a mestizo majority like the Northern Argentinian provinces and would be better off becoming part of the Republic of Argentina.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.32.121.29 (talk) 21:56, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Integrate Santa Cruz in Argentina 

message: I translated the Waters section. --Error (talk) 17:07, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translated
Talk:Blue blazer

message: I wrote a sourced passage about the Blue Blazer cocktail for the Flaming beverages article. I had not realized that I was duplicating a good chunk of the material from this article. Reading back through this article again, I noted all the citation requests for various claims, and I also noted that there were inconsistencies and contradictions with the reliably sourced information I had already tracked down. Since there were already two hat notes to similarly named articles, I decided the best thing to do would be turn this page into a disambiguation page to all three articles, and get rid of all the problematic unsourced stuff at the same time.
That being said, if someone wants to flesh out the article even more than I have, then I am not opposed to splitting Blue Blazer out of Flaming Beverages (leaving behind the key points relating to the history of flaming beverages, of course) and back into this page as a full-blown article. I don't have the time or interest to do that myself. But maybe someone else will want to in the future. If so, great! You might want to bring it up on the Talk:Flaming beverages page first. I probably should have done that here before making such a bold change. But, I really don't see why someone would object to ditching the old for the new. If I'm wrong, please slap me (gently) with a trout, and revert my edit. Of course, you'll also need to fix the problems with the article if you go that route, but that would be a good thing, too. —Willscrlt ( Talk  com  b:en  meta ) 09:38, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Changed to a disambiguation page
Talk:Common market (cocktail)

message: This article is on the Mixed Drinks WikiProject to-do list to be merged with several other related articles, all created by the same bartender. This will be completed as soon as someone has the chance to complete the process.
It is important that this page be kept and turned into a redirect to preserve the edit history of this drink for GFDL license requirements. Thank you. --Willscrlt (Talk·Cntrb) 14:38, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Hold That Ghost

message: I found :Image:A&cvolume1dvd.jpg and noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. Someone will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If it was obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the  tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as  or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If there are other files on this page, consider checking that they have specified their source and are tagged properly, too. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:54, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unspecified source for [[:Image:A&cvolume1dvd.jpg]]

message: :Image:A&cvolume1dvd.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 04:54, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:A&cvolume1dvd.jpg

message: Hold The Ghost provides a fairly lengthy plot section, but leaves out even the most minimum description of Abbott and Costello. Certainly their films, including this one are film classic and warrant some introductory sentences.--Swalrus007 (talk) 02:12, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs additional information