lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Transfusion (EP)

message: After a review of this article, I believe that the article, overall, meets the GA criteria:
*It is comprehensively written, and is informative, containing all necessary information.
*It makes good use of an infobox coupled with an image
*It is stable (pretty much as stable as you can get, really)
*It is soundly referenced and is verifiable (of course, there are never enough inline cites, really; a few more would be nice)
*It is neutral, and it is broad in its coverage
Therefore:  GA pass. Well done to all involved. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 07:22, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA pass
Talk:Untitled

message: This list is a mess.  Some of the works mentioned ARE untitled, others are titled "Untitled".  zellin t / c 21:13, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I took the liberty of re-compiling a list of articles that could conceivably be referred to as "Untitled", and setting new parameters for the list. It includes only direct links to existing articles, as opposed to "A song by This Band; A song by That Band, etc." for two reasons: a) according to WP:DISAMBIG, a disambiguation page is supposed to help users navigate between existing articles, and b) a search at AllMusicGuide for "untitled" came up with over 900 song hits, leading me to think that the list would be unmaintainable if it tried to include every single artist that had ever created a song without a title.
I did not include links to articles for future projects that have yet to receive a title because it would make the list a total hassle to maintain (including links to stuff that will never happen, changing the links whenever stuff does get released) and it's questionable under WP:CRYSTAL if those articles should exist at all.
I did my best to sort out which works were actually titled "Untitled" and which works were just untitled, and to sort works by type, but I certainly could have erred there and would welcome any corrections on that count, or any discussion on whether there's a better format for this page. Propaniac 15:06, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Total overhaul of list
Talk:MH-1A

message: According to this blog, it was the SS William Sturgis, hull number 800. But according to both List of Liberty ships: W and List of Liberty ships by hull number, 751, the William Sturgis was scrapped in 1969, the year after MH-1A started operation in Panama. There seems no way of reconciling this date with this being the ship in question; If it had been the same year, or earlier, or after the cessation of operations, it might make some sense. Is one of the dates wrong, then? Or is it a different ship? And which one? Andrewa 13:28, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Which Liberty ship

message: [F]loating nuclear power station currently redirects to Russian floating nuclear power station. Since that article isn't about floating nuclear power stations in general and since this article already has a link to it in the See also section, I'll de-wikilink it. —⁠184.248.242.163 (talk) 18:17, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikilink for ''floating nuclear power station'' in intro
Talk:Whenever You Need Somebody

message: Is there any reference for the release date? It was changed/set without any reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Whenever_You_Need_Somebody&type=revision&diff=756220465&oldid=749676644  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.149.174.146 (talk) 01:44, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release date
Talk:Windsong

message: I'm sorry to get up everybody's nerves, but I was listening to Denver's "Windsong", and it had some inappropriate lyrics:
:::The wind is the hand of our mother, the Earth.
:::The wind is the hand of our father, The Sky.
:::The wind watches over our struggles and pleasures.
:::The wind is THE GODDESS who first learned to fly.
BLASPHEMY!!!!!! I though Denver never sang blasphemy!
Now this brings a question of mine, is he really spiritually dead?
Can someone site his religion for me, please? Benjamin908 (talk) 17:26, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inappropriate Title Track...
Talk:Ziggy Stardust and the Spiders from Mars (film)

message: From what I can get from the sources (mostly Billboard), it looks like Love You till Tuesday and Serious Moonlight video were both released in May 1984 or thereabouts, while Ziggy Stardust and the Spiders from Mars: The Motion Picture video came out in August 1984.  I've corrected the chronology accordingly. TheBlinkster (talk) 16:42, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Video chronology  - release dates 

message: I consulted the excellent David Bowie article to see which WikiProjects might have an interest in this article. I added WP:LGBT and WP:ROCK because I am a member of those WikiProjects. Other WikiProjects probably have interest in this article too, but I did not want to add them indiscriminately. Please add interested WikiProjects as you see fit - be sure to put them under the  - see Template:WikiProject banner shell for instructions. ¶ I made some other edits to the talk page, which you can see in this diff. Thanks!   - Mark D Worthen PsyD (talk) (I'm a man—traditional male pronouns are fine.) 01:48, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProjects 

message: This article was Start-class with only one WikiProject—WP:BEATLES—listed. I changed it to C-class for all three WikiProjects, including the two I added, although I believe it meets the generic B-class criteria. I did not want to unilaterally upgrade the article to B-class. But I would support such a change for WP:ROCK and WP:LGBT if you (anyone reading this) believes the article meets B-class criteria. Thank you   - Mark D Worthen PsyD (talk) (I'm a man—traditional male pronouns are fine.) 01:58, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  B-class?
Talk:Nadir Afonso

message: Update: there were no peer reviews as of this date. --maf (talk-cont) 15:13, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Peer review request

message: *GA FAIL
**Constant change of tense from past to present. Maintain it at Past unless it applies to the present. (if it does, use present perfect)
**Unnecessarily elaborate & wound up English: "19xx was the year" Correct: In 19xx,
**Shallow understanding: Unless you've studied Nadir Afonso and art in general, you can't write an article on him. You fail to explain how reorientation of the "his concepts of the origin and essence of art" was controversial to his work. Was his work art or architecture? What are his new fundamentals of aesthetics? "Architecture is a science, a team elaboration"... Ok... But what relevance do the quotation and elaboration achieve in explaining anything?
**Keep track of chronology when mentioning art theories, etc.: I don't have any idea if this controversial theory is his current theory or if it's second to the last of his theories or what. You might expect the readers to refer to the introduction to figure out what his theory is.... no.
**Too few sources: there are too few sources to write about Nadir Afonso and his art theories. A lot of it sounds like original research to me. 
**Improper citation: Also, some are not properly cited. The entire organization is wrong. You should have a Reference section, and a Notes section. The Notes Section is where you give page numbers for book cites that appear frequently. All the websites should also be in the Notes Section. For example, "Idem". Yeah, thanks for giving the author's last name... You should give full citation of the book in the Reference section.
**Good job, and good luck. : )
(Wikimachine 15:25, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Good article nominee #2

message: I don't know the work well enough to say, but it doesn't seem to meet the definition given at Geometric abstraction. Hope this helps, "alyosha" (talk) 02:16, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why geometric abstractionist? 
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Skepticism

message: *
*
An arsonist was convicted of setting a number of fires in Italy, but our article seems to give equal weight to the possibility the cause was "unknown" and could have been aliens, demons, conspiracy, or some paranormal cause. - LuckyLouie (talk) 19:43, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canneto di Caronia fires 

message: I have just nominated the UFO convention article for deletion. The conventions listed were mostly not notable and the article has become a place of clutter. Why would someone need to understand what a UFO convention is? Just make a category once you have enough notable conventions? Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UFO convention I don't feel strongly about this article, I just dislike seeing articles that don't provide content, and not seeing reliable sources to beef up the article. Sgerbic (talk) 07:21, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  UFO Convention AfD 

message: There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Sagan standard#Requested move 12 March 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. SilverLocust 💬 19:08, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move at [[Talk:Sagan standard#Requested move 12 March 2024]] 

message: There is currently a discussion concerning the question of religion and whether or not it is an appropriate subject for the Fringe Theories Noticeboard. Experienced editors are encouraged to join the conversation. -Ad Orientem (talk) 19:47, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Religion at the Fringe Theories Noticeboard
Talk:Speeton

message: Is Speeton the northernmost settlement in England that lies due north of central London (not the prime meridian at Greenwich). I have only estimated this and have not edited that article because I cannot provide a source and I have only guessed. However I definitely know it would be a place near the East/North Yorkshire border and Flamborough head.--2.24.174.59 (talk) 20:22, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
Talk:List of Wizz Air destinations

message: Somebody needs to update the destination map to reflect the recent changes in Wizz Air's network. They no longer fly to Turkey, but they have just launched a domestic network within Ukraine. They also no longer fly to Grenoble in France. I would do it, but I neither have the programme nor the know-how. Dennisc24 (talk) 11:58, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Destination Map 

message: I can guess what the one word notes in the table mean, but it would be better if someone who "knows" adds a definition near the table (Top preferred, bottom would do however).
I guess "Base" means it is a Wizzair hub and has routes to many different airports. Perhaps "Terminated" means that they USED to fly to the stated airport, but no longer do - would it be better to shade these in monochrome grey or move them to a separate table? Presumably Seasonal means they fly there for some of the year.
-- SGBailey (talk) 22:17, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notes definitions
Talk:Signalkuppe

message: What is this ‘prominent gendarme atop the east ridge’? A joke? Or does gendarme have a different meaning for climbers? —Ian Spackman 13:39, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of Virgin Atlantic destinations

message: looking at flightstats.com it seems that Virgin has been flying from Winninpeg to LHR as flight VS24 on Saturdays. Could it be a chartered flight, if so should it be added to the destinations list?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Matt7272727272 (talk • contribs) 17:03, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canada? 

message: Should terminated destination be included in this list? The article states "The following is a list of current destinations served by Virgin Atlantic as of May 2015. Therefore I believe those that are now longer served should be removed (or at least moved to another table). Perhaps have categories of:
* Future destination (i.e. Planned but first flight hasn't happend)
* Seasonal
* Terminating (i.e. Terminating or route/destination has been announced but the final flight hasn't yet happened)
Rehnn83 Talk 14:55, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terminated destintaions
Talk:Westminster Group

message: Please note the issues with this page have now been resolved by myself and EVB-WIKI. I trust this meets wikipedia's satisfaction and quality that readers come to expect. Please get back in touch if not. Otherwise, please can this delete template be removed now? Thanks. Mcneillg 17:59, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: An administrator will get to it anytime now. I believe they do the uncontested deletes first and allow time for the contested ones to be worked on. In my experience, this is usually resolved within 24 hours. --Evb-wiki 18:10, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The "Talk" pages help provide the history of the article and should not be deleted. Wikipedia's policy is to archive discussions that are out of date, rather than remove the discussion. There is no need to be concerned though, the comments on this page are pretty common for new articles, and most editors know to take note of the date stamps and timeline of the comments. --Evb-wiki 19:01, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

text: See WP:Featured article. --Evb-wiki 12:24, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: General talk

message: I'm starting to fix it up.Wipsenade (talk) 17:26, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Start

message: I've removed the delete tag, as the article is significantly improved. There's still a good deal of self-praise to remove: I suggest taking a look at every adjective and seeing if its necessary.
Probably the article is still too close to the web site; a slight paraphrase is not sufficient. Try rewriting the first paragraph from scratch, without looking at the previous text or the web. WP would be much happier with the release. We might even think a picture appropriate under the same conditions. DGG 21:20, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: speedy removed, but .. .

message: Hang on, I'll try to source it out.Wipsenade (talk) 18:00, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Sorces
Talk:2nd/10th Field Regiment, Royal Australian Artillery

message: This article conflicts with the official record of the 2/10 field regiment. The following link will redirect to the Australian War Memorial record of the regiment.
http://www.awm.gov.au/units/unit_10380second_world_war.asp?query=2%2F10+Field+Regiment
Ydoc-g1 (talk) 08:49, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Gday - I'm pretty sure they are two completely separate units. The link you provided is to the 2/10th Field Regiment which was raised during the Second World War as part of the 2nd Australian Imperial Force. Anotherclown (talk) 01:05, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I will remove the template; please put the template back if you have another request edit. --JustBerry (talk) 22:14, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  FWIW an article has now been created for the WWII unit with a similar name - pls see 2/10th Field Regiment (Australia) and there is now a hatnote at the top of this article. Thanks AR. Anotherclown (talk) 20:42, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Toronto District Christian High School

message: I'm wondering if this article has been improved enough to remove the WP:Tone tag. I didn't think it was appropriate for me to do without someone else's opinion first. Mr. Absurd 07:41, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed it anyways, it wasn't needed anymore. Mr. Absurd (talk) 02:47, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Problems with tone

message: Don't bother. Your edits will be reversed in seconds and you'll just get yourself banned.  Eric3K (talk) 17:15, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Looking to vandalize this page?
Talk:List of Australian Army Corps

message: Just an idea but maybe it could be turned into a table still in traditional corps order but with additional columns such as:
*Lanyard Colour
*Home of Corps (location/school)
*Corps birthday
*Corps motto
*Current Head of Corps
*Current Honorary Colonel in Chief
--TinTin (talk) 01:17, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Turn it into a table?
Talk:5th Battalion, Royal Australian Regiment

message: This article contains quite a bit of material which isn't directly relevant to this battalion and is adequatly covered in other articles. For instance, the 'Origins' section is about the formation of the RAR 20 years before 5 RAR was formed, and the first two paras of the 'Iraq' section are about 5/7 RAR, not this battalion. Nick-D (talk) 10:41, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, this material could be removed with out detracting from the article. Anotherclown (talk) 10:54, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I agree, Nick. This article is on my list, but I'm not sure if I'll have time in the next two months to do any work on it. AustralianRupert (talk) 06:47, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Over-long 

message: Does the article mention the AFVs 5RAR uses? 5/7 used to have M113s but I don't see mention of the current AFV in the 5RAR or 7RAR articles. Brettr (talk) 03:05, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vehicles
Talk:Directorate of Research and Civil Affairs

message: The first and third sentences in this article need referencing (or perhaps deletion/modification). In my view what DORCA did is not so very mysterious, and these two sentences are in slight conflict with the remainder of the article.  I think there is no doubt that Conlon with his penchant for avoiding correct bureaucratic pathways, and his extremely forthright reporting (see the Pybus reference) antagonised a great many people, and was disliked by them: Post-war he never served his country again in a leadership position, with the exception of a short stint at ASOPA.) Thus, Conlon the only director of DORCA, had the powerful backing of Blamey but was in conflict with Forde and Calwell in the cabinet, and probably many others. MargaretRDonald (talk) 22:33, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  First and third sentences
Category talk:Hydroelectricity by country

message: There are two country based catagories in regards to hydro-electricity:
:Hydroelectricity by country  (this one) and
:Hydroelectric power stations by country 
imho this is far from ideal. I ran into this in an actual situation where I was looking for information about a hydroelectricity dam in Iceland so I started looking in Category:Hydroelectricity by country thus (here) and couldn't find it.
Continued searching and did find this catagory (Hydroelectric power stations by country) and I don't see a reason why you would like to have those two catagories next to eachother: it only introduces the risk that something is listed in one cat and not in the other one.
So mayme we should merge these two cats.
But as I'm not involved actively in this subject there might be a good reason to have to cats ? (other then that it "just happened over time"). I will try to get inform some people who are active in this subject to see if they (also) think these two cats should be merged. If that call is made I'm happy to help in the actual merging: but we would need consensus with members of the WikiProject Energy team. Tonkie (talk) 19:02, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging with Category:Hydroelectricity by country
Talk:John Fortenberry

message: Rv almost empty infobox per WP:MOS (re infoboxes): “The most important group to consider are the casual readers of Wikipedia, who will never do any significant editing. Infobox templates that contain many blank fields, question marks as well as Unknowns present an unprofessional appearance, diminishing Wikipedia’s reputation as a high-quality encyclopedia.” Quis separabit? 13:59, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Almost empty infox
Talk:Finland Proper (historical province)

message: This page should be moved to "Varsinais-Suomi (historical province)" ("Finland Proper" is an incorrect translation; the name isn't officially translated to english). Jouk (talk) 07:20, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Moving to Varsinais-Suomi (historical province)
Talk:After (Prose novel)

message: :Image:Afterbookcover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 02:50, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Afterbookcover.jpg
Talk:Bengt Algotsson

message: This is political propaganda that doesn't belong on Wikipedia:
"Benedict returned to Sweden, but according to tradition was besieged in Rönneholm castle in Scania "
Scania (Skåneland) was not part of Sweden but an independent party in a personal union (Sweden-Norway-Scania).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unions_of_Sweden#Norway_.28I.29_and_Sk.C3.A5neland  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.67.250.76 (talk) 10:14, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
Talk:James O'Hara (quartermaster)

message: "with partner John Reed established Pittsburgh Point Brewery" - according to Stanley Barron, Brewed in America, p132, the Point Brewery was founded by Peter Shiras in 1795, and acquired by O'Hara only in 1803 Zythophile (talk) 14:25, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Business life - Point brewery not founded by O'Hara
Talk:Duke of Finland

message: If this is a tertiogeniture, what is the secundogeniture? Reigen (talk) 07:20, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: what territory is the duchy of finland meant to encompass? there is no mention of geography of this title until it becomes the grand duchy. do we not have information on this? shouldnt there be maps for each creation of the duchy? or does it simple correspond to say, the eastern land of sweden or the finland proper province? 2A00:23C6:5D08:B800:BD0D:E49A:EE70:C7CC (talk) 16:30, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  territory?
Talk:Machete Music

message: 💪🏼💪🏼💪🏼🇵🇷🇵🇷🇵🇷 2600:1702:20F0:15A0:9968:FE6A:45D8:4258 (talk) 06:07, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Machete music
Talk:Emily Rose (actress)

message: I'm not sure the added commentary on Haven's production locations have much bearing on Emily Rose's biography - plus, the comment about Syfy's productions being based in British Columbia isn't true any more...Toronto and Montreal host several of the shows. They aren't even really Syfy's production facilities, but belong to the studio making the show... Doconeill (talk) 02:34, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Three and a half years later, I removed the production crap. — Wyliepedia 08:00, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments on Haven production 
Talk:Flush with Power

message: Is it just me or is the sentence incomplete? At the same meeting Dale's request for a variance to install an electric fence complete with guard tower. Kushal 18:42, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  incomplete sentence?
Category talk:Councillors in Greater London

message: Wikipedia:Notability_%28people%29 says:
Notable politicians are those:
:Politicians who have held international, national or statewide/provincewide office, and members and former members of a national, state or provincial legislatures.5
:Major local political figures who have received significant press coverage.
:Just being an elected local official does not guarantee notability.
I suspect a lot of these are non-notable. Secretlondon 14:17, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: When the category becomes large enough to subdivide, the sub categories could include 'members of London-wide bodies' (ie taking pre- and post- 1965 boundaries), pre-1965 boroughs (Municipal and Metropolitan) and post- 1965, and possibly the City of London. Would this be convenient? Jackiespeel (talk) 19:30, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestion