Talk:Reform of the United Nations

message: I am considering starting an article devoted to Security Council reform. My main concern is that content on UN Security Council and Reform of the United Nations will overlap, requiring people to update both pages to keep up with the news. This way, we could put a link to the Main article: Reform of the UN Security Council on both pages, and just update that main article as news breaks. However, we could end up updating all three. Hmm. Rad Racer 15:13, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Security Council reform article

message: "For the UN to become more democratic in a direct sense, four things would presumably have to happen:..."
Whose opinion is this? Is this just a personal opinon of the editor, or based on some official documents of any country or organization? World3 24 Apr 2005
* I noticed that too. It was odd espescially considering number 3 didn't seem to have anything to do with being more democratic. Jimbobsween 04:26, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Whose opinion?

message: "I studied the issue of possible UNSC reform when I wrote my Law Honours thesis, and I read some material in int'l law articles re proposals to intro major permanent regional power seats for Africa, Asia and Latin America which were to be alternated every few yrs- ie African seat between Nigeria, Egypt and SA, Asian between India, Indonesia and Pakistan, Latin American- Brazil and Argentina. Also, there've been discussions thruout the yrs to increase the SC's size to anything up to 20-25 above the current 15. Of course, whether any of this proposed change happens is very open to question, given the dinosaurically slow nature of any reforms actually occurring in such a cumbersome bureaucracy."
Anyone know anything about this?
* Definitey, Plans A and B from Kofi Annan's ideas on UNSC reform include increasing UNSC membership to 24, but that's been included now in the UNSC reform page, I think. Alphamatrix 22:02, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Something I read from a site

message: What countries are part of the UN? --CyclePat 20:28, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Your kidding right? Jcdams 21:40, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In case your question *was* serious, check out United Nations member states and list of unrecognized countries. —Nightstallion (?) 15:54, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  What countries are part of the UN? 

message: In reading through this article, the section on "democratization" and "improving diversity" seems not so much to address reforms currently being considered for the UN reform, but a what a UN that would function more as a "world government" might look like.  Some bits have certainly been discussed (mainly proportional voting and elimination of the veto) as serious revisions of the GA or SC, but the bits talking about "world government" seem to fall a bit beyond the scope of this article.  I thought I would see if there are any comments/objecftions to this change before I removed some of this and cleaned up that section. Auric04 19:00, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Section on Democratization

message: Is anyone willing to help me verify the information in this topic? I'd like to see some citations in the article, and check that the information is creditable, not just opinion. Alphamatrix 22:09, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations

message: I would like to propose the following concept for reform (or replacement) of the United Nations:
www.UnitedDemocraticNations.org
I am posting it here for two distinct purposes, first to pose it as a possible inclusion on the article page, second to elicit feedback.
gary —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 206.86.193.170 (talk) 19:59, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Democratization Reform Proposal 

message: This entire section reads as not a npov. If its kept at all, it probably should be rewritten as something else other than a gripe about the UN's failings from the perspective of the United States. ChronoSphere (talk) 13:29, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV: Ways the United Nations can be reformed

message: What on earth meaning is Vandalism?The reason is not understood.  whether information added why was deleted.It is possible to correct it appropriately no understanding of you of my English. Though I think that the name of countries or information on the number necessary for the resolution is profitable. --大和屋敷 (talk) 04:57, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: What Vandalism?

message: Another problem with the United Nations is that finances are not controlled by the overwhelming monetary contributors. In theory, democratizing the budget by allowing all members to vote on it would be the ideal. However, as in voting matters concerning non-fiscal issues, blocs are formed that effectively quell reform.
I'm deleting this since it is biased saying that there is an ideal.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.62.20.190 (talk) 16:10, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: BIAS

message: http://www.unsceb.org/content/about
Cantab1985 (talk) 08:11, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  How about adding the CEB 

message: Are there Dr'in Yemen working for the UK 2600:1700:3400:3F40:30F8:4A2A:AA4E:F50E (talk) 23:44, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dr's in Yemen front UKAre there Dr's in Yemen  

message: Do you believe the tragedies of the rest of Myanmar? They can't do anything and they are a group that can't be used 202.191.107.56 (talk) 17:37, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Myanmar