Talk:Fisherman

message: True or false: unlike "fireman", "policeman", and "mailman", which are now replaced by "fire fighter", "police officer", and "mail carrier", "fisherman" is still commonly accepted generically. 66.32.66.181 14:12, 16 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Gender issues

message: *This article should be a basic commodity, it desperately needs to be edited. User:66.32.66.181 14:12, 16 May 2004
*There is FAR more about inshore and deep-water work fishermen that could be included here. Are there any work fishermen's email groups that could be asked to add to Wikipedia? (Please put sport angling stuff in angler or angling.) Anthony Appleyard 12:01, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please Someone Add to this 

message: In the introductory part, is says that "Fishing has existed as a means of obtaining food since the Mesolithic period." I think that would make it the second-oldest line of work that exists and has done so continuously since it was first carried out by humans. The oldest would be gathering (not of fish, but of plants), which is still practiced for a living by some hunter-gatherers. I'm not a fisherman, but I think this is worth noting. --Tracerbullet11 (talk) 18:32, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The second-oldest line of work that still exists? 

message: There should be a picture representing a recreational fisherman.  This picture on the right is representative of a recreational fisherman tell me what you think.   --Lord Clarence (talk) 15:30, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Please place your comments at the bottom of pages, and not at the top. The picture you are suggesting seems to be of a clown who wants to show off his muscles, and thinks fishing is something to do with American football. This is not a representative image of a recreational fisherman. At best, it is an attempt, of questionable taste, to be humorous. There are over 6,000 images available on fishing at commons, many of which include recreational fishermen. You need to establish why your image is more eppropriate than the others available. --Epipelagic (talk) 22:58, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

text: Epipelagic, I see what you are trying to do here and I don't like it.  I am not going to be feeding any trolls today.  The way you are talking in the forum is harassment.  I do not see how that picture has anything to do with football.  A recreational fisherman could have any type of physical appearance.  A fisherman could be muscular, skinny, or even over weight.  You cannot judge a fisherman on physical appearance.  This is not questionable taste, and I am not attempting to be funny.  This is a great photo of a recreational fisherman.  What does a recreational fisherman look like to you?  --Lord Clarence (talk) 02:17, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: LC the picture you are refering to doesnt convey the message of a recreational fisherman, it could equally just be a man buying a fish from monger at a village market. Any picture should at least include some fishing equipment preferably in use, a veiwer should be able to tell the person is fishing for recreation not for sport or commercial reasons. Gnangarra 07:19, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Recreational Fisherman Picture

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Fisherman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080228015706/http://www.icsf.net/icsf2006/uploads/publications/samudra/pdf/english/issue_28/art01.pdf to http://www.icsf.net/icsf2006/uploads/publications/samudra/pdf/english/issue_28/art01.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:23, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified