lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Cyber Criminology

message: This page should be included to the Cybercrime page and the page's title should redirect to that article as well. Monkeytheboy (talk) 20:17, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have redirected to cybercrime. The whole text was spam, not to mention a blatant copyright violation of this.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pichpich (talk • contribs) 00:15, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Talk:World Maritime University

message: Deleted text copied from website --Nengscoz416 (talk) 00:37, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Training

message: The section on parochial schools is in the topic of education, not training, and would fit better in an article on education. It may already be there, making this one redundant. · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 04:52, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split section on parochial schools 

message: I think this article could benefit from reviewing the historical development of the training industry between the late 1800s and today.
e.g. Dale Carnegie built a training business starting in 1912. 
Lauchlanmack (talk) 23:44, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical context? 

message: In my opinion, I strongly believe that the training pictogram should be moved to the start of the article before the text reaches the other sections of the article as I feel that the pictogram is in an inappropriate place at present in the 'See also' section of the article. Xboxsponge15 (talk) 16:21, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you provide some logical reasoning to support your opinion? · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 16:48, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The training pictogram should be moved to a different location within the article 

message: Hi,
I edited this page, on the section of "Occupational skills training" and it was rejected by https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:MrOllie
I inserted a sentence, and provided a reference from an accredited scientific journal from a literature review. I read the page of the editor, and it seems this type of unprofessional censoring is a norm from this editor. I have been a fan of Wikipedia for over a decade and donated to Wikipedia many times. Now, is this immediate rejection a new policy? Who decided that MrOllie should be censoring new inputs?
Please provide me with a sound reason, and bring my trust to Wikipedia.
Doozandeh (talk) 14:59, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I have moved your post here, this talk page is the place to try to seek consensus for your changes.  Thanks, —PaleoNeonate – 15:09, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  My edits rejected 

message: Life orientation 2C0F:F528:40:618:2D85:879E:495A:644A (talk) 19:00, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  What training have you completed since starting to be a social worker
Talk:Treason Act (Ireland) 1537

message: Bearian (talk) 00:45, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

message: The Act has disappeared from the government website, but that doesn't mean it has been repealed. Acts which were repealed after 1991 are still on the website. We know this Act was still in force in 1998 because it was amended by the Crime and Disorder Act. I will have an opportunity to check the Westlaw and LexisNexis websites later this week. In the meantime I have reported the dead link. Richard75 (talk) 10:20, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Repealed in the UK?
Talk:Blacklick Estates, Ohio

message: Civil Engineering, Volume 33. Walter Edgar Jessup, American Society of Civil Engineers, 1963. Description of development of Blacklick Estates on page 23 looks quite substantial based on Google Books search result; but page view snippet not helpful.
"Finally, the number one rating in community stability goes to Blacklick Estates." Whatever that means. From the American Suburbs Rating Guide and Fact Book. Alan Willis, Bennett Jacobstein. Toucan Valley Publications, 1993, , 9780963401755. Compare Google Books search result with snippet view.
If I only had access to a real library... ; ) postdlf (talk) 17:08, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources for expansion 
Talk:77th Armor Regiment

message: Insiste firmiter = Persevere resolutely
*insistere 
::persist, dwell upon, stand upon
*firmiter
::the trait of being resolute; firmness of purpose
Byzerodivide (talk) 02:33, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: 77th AR soldiers were trained that it meant "Stand Firmly".  As in, "hold your ground".  Rklawton (talk) 18:48, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Insiste firmiter translation 

message: I'm working to build this page to be as accurate and informative as possible.  Here is what I currently require information on:
*Commanders of the 77th Armor Regiment
*Detailed accounts of the 77th's actions in previous (and current) wars.
Thanks user:joshuashearn  —Preceding undated comment was added at 12:09, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Information Needed

message: Technically speaking, 1-77 Armor is not an armored regiment/battalion. Due to the new Army transformation, as one of three manuever battalions in a heavy Brigade Combat Team, 1-77 is a Combined Arms Battalion. Alpha and Bravo are infantry companies; Charlie and Delta are armor companies; and Echo is an engineer company. Hal06 (talk) 23:34, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: @Joshuashearn, I can't help but notice that the companies mentioned are not in the article. Faithful15 (talk) 19:52, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: So can someone please include the current structure? Faithful15 (talk) 20:00, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Combined Arms Battalion
Talk:Brimfield (CDP), Ohio

message: Another note I noticed on the edits reverted by Nyttend...most of the information he removed was not only unsourced, but it was also about Brimfield Township. This article is about the Brimfield Census Designated Place within Brimfield Township, but not the township itself. Please keep that in mind when adding additional info to this article as well as making sure it is properly sourced. --JonRidinger (talk) 16:23, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edits 

message: To add to article: the year Brimfield was established. I believe 2016 is its bicentennial year, but there is currently no mention of this in the article. 173.89.236.187 (talk) 19:02, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: That's because this is about the census-designated place known as Brimfield, which is just a part of Brimfield Township. The article on the township itself can be found at Brimfield Township, Portage County, Ohio. --JonRidinger (talk) 01:28, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: To add to article

message: I've been thinking about the whole issue of WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, and it seems this article would be better served at Brimfield (CDP), Ohio with Brimfield, Ohio as a redirect to Brimfield Township, Portage County, Ohio. Along those same lines, the Atwater, Ohio article would be the same, going to Atwater (CDP), Ohio and redirecting Atwater, Ohio, to Atwater Township, Portage County, Ohio (which it previously did...the Atwater CDP debuted in the 2010 census). My reasoning is simply that the CDPs are virtually unknown locally. Yes, they show up on maps, but few people, if any, know what the CDP is or recognize it as a measure of the community. When "Brimfield" or "Atwater" are identified in primary and secondary sources, it most often is referring to the respective township as a whole, not the CDP or the hamlet at the township center. WP:CITIES even discussed the whole issue of mentioning CDPs a little while back. I wanted to get some feedback, though, before a formal move request. --JonRidinger (talk) 05:19, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Informal move discussion 
Talk:Silva compass

message: Currently, the marine compasses, like the c58, are sold by garmin, which state that they have acquired the Nexus brand and market marine products under Silva now. 
https://buy.garmin.com/de-DE/DE/marine-wassersport/kompasse/cOnTheWater-c10160-p1.html
Does anyone know if this only applies to the US, maybe in conjunction with the brand dispute?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.28.141.185 (talk) 15:44, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  corporate changes in brand? (January 2018) 
Talk:Australian Marine Conservation Society

message: Please also mention, or cross reference, the American Littoral Society. See: http://www.littoralsociety.org/  Thanks! --Lbeaumont (talk) 23:34, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  American Littoral Society 

message: The Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/To-do/Organisations and institutions request list (how do I cite that?? Please excuse my ignorance, still learning...) asks for an entry for the Australian Littoral Society. On researching this I discovered that the Australian Marine Conservation Society was originally named the Queensland Littoral Society, and then changed names to the Australian Littoral Society, before changing to its current name, the Australian Marine Conservation Society. It doesn't seem to me sufficiently notable to justify a unique page on the Australian Littoral Society so I'm adding that info to this page. If you know how I can appropriately edit the Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/To-do/Organisations and institutions list and remove it from there and/or put this explanation there, I would be very grateful for some guidance. Cabrils (talk) 10:14, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Australian Littoral Society request
Talk:Vlastimil Brodský

message: I believe that the subject of this article is notable, even if the article currently doesn't do a good job of explaining why. I shall attempt to find a reference or two in support of this notability when I've finished writing this comment. (In the mean time, I note as at least indicative that Vlastimil Brodský appears on Wikipedia:WikiProject Czech Republic's Wanted articles list, which suggests that they also consider him article-worthy.) --Paul A (talk) 00:56, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The speedy deletion of this page is contested 

message: OK, I just made a starter article for others to improve on, I as a Czech can say that he is one of the most accomplished actors in the country, and yes I started the article because I found it on the "requested" page.--Dominik92 (talk) 01:22, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, but none of that was in the article that was tagged for deletion. Too skimpy a "starter article" leads to swift deletion by people unfamiliar with the subject matter. No insult to the Czech theater was intended. --Orange Mike  | Talk 01:55, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not Notable?! Are you kidding?
Talk:68th Armor Regiment

message: Wasn't there a 2nd Battalion under the Combat Arms Regimental System, too?  I seem to remember that 2-68 was the armor battalion in Baumholder (2nd Brigade, 8th Infantry Division) in the late 80's.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by SEWalk (talk • contribs) 09:11, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  2nd Bn 

message: The article's main infobox has the unit's motto ("Ventre a terre") and its translation ("Bellies to the ground"). The motto is in French, and the form of the French word "ventre" is singular in number, and would properly be translated "belly" and not as a plural ("bellies") as given in the infobox. I know little of French and its idioms, but if the motto refers to the unit, as a whole (as many unit mottoes do, although many others do not, and refer to the members of the unit, instead), then the translation of the word as singular, as is its form (that is, "Belly to the ground"), would make sense. I have communicated before, with the US Army's heraldry office, and they are happy to provide answers. They are the authority to consult, regarding this question. catsmoke (talk) 23:53, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Motto translation 

message: https://www.dvidshub.net/news/297992/light-armored-unit-activated-82nd-airborne-division
Sammartinlai (talk) 06:02, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Please cite your source. --McChizzle (talk) 21:56, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

text: Per Wikipedia's rules, it's on you to prove your statement, particularly when it conflicts with other published information.  In other words, you saying that someone said something is defined as "hearsay" and demanding that the world trust you or email your source directly to confirm your statement is not how things work.  You are highlighting a possible internal Army disagreement that has not been officially acknowledge in the public domain.  Once there is an official Army comment/position in the public domain from the U.S. Army, your information remains "hearsay." --McChizzle (talk) 20:12, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  New tank company under 1 IBCT, 82nd Airborne
Talk:Center for International Environmental Law

message: On Wikipedia, while some primary sources may be used for uncontroversial facts (WP:ABOUTSELF, WP:MISSION), secondary reliable sources are generally expected (WP:PRIMARY, WP:RS).  I noticed that there already were tags at the top of the article and added myself one in relation to the lack of secondary sources.  Those tags can be removed when the issue is solved.  A quick search using Google news and books do come up with independent sources mentioning CIEL, its activities and reports.  This indicates that the article meets WP:NORG and that it could be also improved with such secondary sources with a little effort.  —PaleoNeonate – 06:59, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Primary sources
Talk:Special Troops Battalion, 3rd Brigade Combat Team, 101st Airborne Division (United States)

message: Origin and meaning of this word?  The Japanese word for parachute is 落下傘 (rakkasan), so I presume that may be the origin but I have no source.
 The Torii and Rakkansan information are mentioned in
 http://www.gertzfile.com/gertzfile/ring052402.html
 The (problem) text in question is "The Japanese began calling the regiment 
 the "Rakkasan," which roughly translates to "falling umbrella" as a 
 description of 187th soldiers practicing parachute drops."
 
 That is misleading.  "rakkansan" translates to "parachute". 
 You can say that the word "rakkansan" was originally derived 
 from the similarity of parachutes in use to falling umbrellas.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.29.250.107 (talk) 18:01, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rakkasan 

message: Torii is said to be a symbol of this division, is that so?
Not of the division but of the brigade. It was adopted in WWII during fighting with the Japanese. The Rakkasans were given the name which roughtly translated means "Falling UMbrella Men." At that time they took the Torii as their symbol and it has been that ever since. For the rakkasans the Torii is the Gateway To Honor  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 214.13.141.100 (talk) 17:07, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no 'man' in 'rakkansan' (although the sound 'san' is approximately equivalnet to Mr. that is a different kanji with a different meaning).  I have as yet been unable to determine when the word rakkansan came into general use, on the face of it it seems likely that the word (meaning parachute) was there before the brigade was.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.177.23.132 (talk) 10:11, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, it looks like it was in a dictionary (So called 'Green Goddess 1') published in 1930 so it was the Japanese word for parachute before it was applied to the brigade.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.177.23.132 (talk) 11:15, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Torii 

message: The title should be reduced to 3rd Special Troops Battalion (United States). The higher formations (3rd BCT, 187 Inf., 101st Abn. Div.) should be referenced in the article but should be cut out of the title to preserve space. User:Hotspur23  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.147.155.7 (talk) 22:18, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Title
Talk:Environmental Law and Policy Center

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://elpc.org/about and others. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:22, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: This article went from a teeny tiny stub to a promotional behemoth in one edit in 2012 by a SPA that made that and one minor edit to this page and then disappeared. If someone has content knowledge, this page needs a cleanup. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:17, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Promotional article
Talk:Environmental Protection Agency (Ireland)

message: Changed name back to Environmental Protection Agency (Ireland) that someone changed to Environmental Protection Agency (Republic of Ireland). Article's on an Ireland related subject nearly always have ...(Ireland) after its name. Examples:
* Law Reform Commission (Ireland)
* National Transport Authority (Ireland)
* Department of Defence (Ireland)
* Minister of State (Ireland)
* National Security Committee (Ireland)
It's beyond past the stage for Wikipedia to stop insisting on using the blatantly wrong and false use of the term "Republic of" for Ireland's name. The UN, EU and even Britain all recognise the one and singular name of this country is....Ireland. DojoIrl (talk) 01:43, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Name change
Talk:Greenguard Environmental Institute

message: Per WP:TRADEMARK, I have moved this article and replaced "GREENGUARD" with "Greenguard". WP:TRADEMARK says:
:"Follow standard English text formatting and capitalization rules, even if the trademark owner considers nonstandard formatting "official": 
::avoid: REALTOR®, TIME, KISS
::instead, use: Realtor, Time, Kiss"
Ground Zero | t 13:03, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name/capitalization
Talk:Gluaiseacht

message: Gluaiseacht has been refered to in newspapers and other publications.
Irish Times
*European ecotopia 
*Sellafield - Mox plant protest in uk , ,
* Shell protest in london 
* Sellafield demonstration , 
* Trident submarine base in Faslane, Scotland. ,,
* In relation to No vote on lisbon 
* G8 protests - , 
Irish Independent
* Sellafield protest ,, 
* Genoa G8 protest 
* Nuclear submarine base protest - 
* Mayday protest dublin - 
* Greenguide - 
* Dublin protests 
Others
, ,,, and indymedia
While I cannot verify the facts of the articles I believe that they are notabile and thus I will remove the banner on the front of the article. Any comments welcome. Mrchris (talk) 17:25, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia:Notability 

message: What does Gluaiseacht mean? This is the English-language wikipedia.86.42.199.13 (talk) 06:16, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Meaning?
Talk:International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas

message: This article, as well as the 16 articles on CGIAR and its sub entities in the article's infobox, appear to have been copied directly from their websites, and are written like adverts.  I've totally rewritten one, but most need to be removed and rewritten for copyvio alone, not to mention the fact that they are all incredibly POV.  
If you're looking for a research project, here's a good one.  I'm also removing the "start" tag from these articles, as an unreferenced copyvio doesn't meet "start" criteria.  T L Miles (talk) 17:23, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Single source / Press release /copypaste

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.icarda.org/Publications/Caravan/Caravan23/About.htm. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:38, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:International Water Management Institute

message: Recent bulk, verbatim additions from the IWMI website have been removed but some dubious material remains and a further review of the the text is needed. --Old Moonraker (talk) 08:37, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violations 

message: This article, as well as the 16 articles on CGIAR and its sub entities in the article's infobox, appear to have been copied directly from their websites, and are written like adverts.  I've totally rewritten one, but most need to be removed and rewritten for copyvio alone, not to mention the fact that they are all incredibly POV.  
If you're looking for a research project, here's a good one.  I'm also removing the "start" tag from these articles, as an unreferenced copyvio doesn't meet "start" criteria.  T L Miles (talk) 17:37, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Single source / Press release /copypaste

message: I have rewritten this page and addressed the concerns outlined here. How do I get the page reassessed?
Thanks, Monsoon Waves (talk) 04:46, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This was a recurring problem, so thanks for all the hard work in fixing the article and making the copyright material unnecessary. --Old Moonraker (talk) 07:34, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page issues addressed 