lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:HMS Nautilus (1914)

message: Shouldn't this article be called HMS Nautilus (1914)?. It isn't really a class as there's only one boat, and it was launched in 1914. Normally that is the date in the title. I have also set up a redir from HMS N1. Welsh 21:29, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, we dab by date of launch rather than date of commissioning. I moved the page to reflect that, but now I'm also unsure about the 'never became combat operational so she was never given the HMS prefix'. Commissioned warships receive the HMS prefix, whether or not they are intended to be combat operational. And since this is really an article about an individual submarine and not a class per se, our conventions would be to move it to HMS Nautilus (1914). But unfortunately there's already a redirect with history there. I'll see about alerting an admin to clear the way for a move. Benea (talk) 15:11, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

message: What does this mean?
: The resulting design changed from the saddle tanks common at the time to a double hull.
At this early date, ballast tanks were placed within the pressure hull. Saddle tanks were a new innovation at this time.  So this submarine is either 40 years ahead of the curve, or this sentence needs some work – quite possibly it was adopting saddle tanks that was the innovation?  Andy Dingley (talk) 23:43, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Saddle tanks
Talk:Williamsburgh Savings Bank Tower

message: These guys list Chambellan as doing the exterior sculpture, as well as the interior stuff.  Should we add that to the article, or . . . . ..........  can we trust them?  Carptrash (talk) 03:07, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd trust them. The architectural sculpture inside and out seems consistent, though the "Lombard" friezes inside are more historicizing.--Wetman (talk) 15:24, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanx for the pix; now I needn't feel I am missing an opportunity when doing other places instead of this one.  From news reports I understand that the 14h Regiment Armory a mile south recently opened on weekends.  For now, it is only represented by my own :File:Park Slope Armory jeh.JPG, snapped hastily when I was trying to get to Brooklyn Bridge before dark.  Incidentally I hope future good pictures go to Wikimedia Commons, where they can be better catalogued, geotagged, and used by other Wikipedias than just English.   Jim.henderson (talk) 01:01, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Exterior sculpture 

message: @Epicgenius  a few notes:
* I see you've already addressed the clarify tag.
*  The source says metal grilles, and doesn't mention windows. Any source say which four continents?
* I'm not sure this sentence should be included, especially in the architecture section of the article: 
voorts (talk/contributions) 01:45, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the copy edit @voorts. I will address these two issues later.The factoid about no one jumping to their death is relatively minor, but I do think it can be included, because an observatory atop a major skyscraper in NYC without any deaths may be noteworthy. At most of the other NYC skyscrapers with observatories that I'm aware of, people have tried to jump off at least once. Epicgenius (talk) 17:23, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  GOCE copy edit notes
Talk:The Age of Bronze

message: What are the dimensions for the age of Bronze?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Oosdja (talk • contribs) 09:50, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Dimensions

message: In the wikipedia article on San Francisco's Palace of the Legion of Honor this work is listed among the "collection highlights."  If it is in their collection then it's missing from the list in this article.  If it is not then the list at California_Palace_of_the_Legion_of_Honor#Collections is in error.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.109.97.238 (talk) 17:34, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing from list? 
Talk:Hamzanama

message: Shouldn't there be a brief plot overview or summary of some kind?  (If I knew it, I'd write it myself) (208.58.221.239 (talk) 17:21, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Added, sort of. Johnbod (talk) 01:12, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot? 

message: First part of Hamzanama in Urdu by Maqbool Jahangir.
*I have removed this file as it is non-free and should not be placed in the talk space. Salavat (talk) 23:37, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  PDF Files
Talk:Baptism of St. Zenobius (Botticelli)

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:11, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Angel (Marvel Comics)

message: *Oppose – I have asked the anonymous user who proposed this merge, User:69.182.78.104, to further explain his rationale here.  The Fallen is a notable character, the article has adequate context, and I feel it does not need to be merged at this time.  It may need to be expanded and/or cleaned up, which is now on my TODO list.  I plan on getting to it in the next few months, seeing as I'm spending less time at work and may be able to bust out the Mutant X issues.  — Madman bum and angel (talk – desk) 04:25, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: After two months of no additional discussion, I propose that discussion close with no consensus.66.109.248.114
*Oppose distinct and notable character. 66.109.248.114 19:33, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal

message: I am removing :Category:LGBT characters in comics because there doesn't seem to be any indication in the article that he has ever been presented as gay or bisexual. If he has, by all means add a sourced reference into the article, and restore the category. TAnthony 21:52, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I actually agree since it was only added because of an alternate version of Angel. The 1604 version being attracted to Jean/John Grey more as a male than as a female. RIANZ 22:20, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sexuality
Talk:Arkwright, New York

message: I'm the WikiProject Cities assessor of this article; if you would like some commentary, give me a holler! --Starstriker7(Say hior see my works) 22:49, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Busti, New York

message: Hey all, I'm the WikiProject Cities assessor of this article. If feedback is what you want and need, come to my talk page and give me a holler! --Starstriker7(Dime algoor see my works) 03:48, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Morey's Piers

message: Dracula's Castle wasn't on Adventure Pier, it was on Nichols Pier, across from Mariner's.-— Preceding unsigned comment added by Tstaunton3t0 (talk • contribs) 00:22, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Location of Dracula's Castle

message: This sounds a bit too much like an advertizement. It needs a few edits. Could someone mark it as sounding like an add. I'm not loged in right now. - 24.0.220.96 (talk) 04:41, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. I'll put up the advertisement template, which will hopefully draw some attention. "The Adventure Pier is 'for the extremist in all of us.'"? I just removed the entire second History section because it was lifted verbatim from the Morey's Pier website and, in turn, from Amusement Parks of New Jersey by Jim Futrell. --Ando228 (talk) 15:08, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I just removed the same copyvio text from the article again. The entire History section was copy/pasted from the Morey's website which was in turn an excerpt from Amusement Parks of New Jersey by Jim Futrell. Deleted. -- Transity(talk • contribs) 02:52, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Sounds like an advertisement

message: What is the relationship between Bill and Will Morey, mentioned in the Pier's official history, and Lou Morey who built most of the motels along with (the same?) Will Morey, per . Please scroll up to page 11. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:42, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Bill and Will... and Lou?

message: Is it appropriate to add something about the girl who died on a ferris wheel on June 3, 2011?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.3.55.102 (talk) 11:18, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Morey's Piers#Incidents. 92.40.15.179 (talk) 01:55, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ferris Wheel Death

message: Dante's Dungeon is a lot older than the atricle states. It's definitely been there since at least the 1990's when it had the name Dante's Inferno 174.240.210.104 (talk) 18:09, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dante's Dungeon 

message: The redirect Splash Zone Water Park has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.   -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 03:49, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Splash Zone Water Park]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: Doesn't appear to meet WP:N and has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully a merge/redirect here could mean readers can still find info on it here. Boleyn (talk) 12:30, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal: [[Flitzer]] to here
Talk:Chris Mars

message: jesust christ this profile needs a lot of work, lots of biased shit going down. SamWhite (talk) 03:13, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm adding a POV tag. - Hawkbreeze 04:25, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality of this article disputed
Talk:Bladen Lakes State Forest

message: This article currently reads like an ad.  I'll put this page on my watchlist and come back in two weeks.  I hope the editors of this page can fix the issue.  The coding is also faulty, any new editors who are editting this page may want to see WP:CHEAT. §hep  •  ¡Talk to me! 01:52, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for fixing the issue. §hep  •  ¡Talk to me! 17:27, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Ad
Category talk:Lesbian writers

message: Hello. I notice that Jan Morris is included in this list. Who says this writer is a lesbian? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.137.96.79 (talk • contribs) 22:05, 4 June 2007
Categories are populated by adding links to the bottom of the individual articles.  This edit is the one which added that article to this category. — CharlotteWebb 07:37, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes I understand that now, so I've dealt with it and explained my reasoning on the article's talk page. Thanks. Peace. 195.137.96.79 05:14, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:The Ledger Awards

message: The notability of this award is currently unclear, since no secondary sources are cited. By the notability criteria for organizations, independent reliable sources are required to make sure that the subject is notable. These sources might be press coverage about the award, or books in which it is mentioned. Please cite such sources in the article. Currently, it only refers to the homepage of the award, which is not independent.
Also, the article would best contain mor information about the award itself, rather than being a listing of people who won the award (cf. WP:NOT#DIR).
For the time being, I am replacing the “importance” tag with “notability”. Sorted as part of the Notability wikiproject. --B. Wolterding 18:52, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: Was there a 2008 award?  RJFJR (talk) 17:45, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There wasn't a 2008 Award however there are plans for future awards refer pulp fiction blogs. Dan arndt (talk) 01:06, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Current
Talk:George Island Light

message: The image in the infobox is of the :Georges Island Lighthouse in Nova Scotia. I cannot find where the infobox is loading from to remove the incorrect image. - Donald Albury 20:29, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong image
Talk:Married (radio series)

message: The article states that Other Arthur Smith became famous by using Our Arthur Smith's material, but is it not more accurate to say he used the Jerry Springer format from our universe?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.147.168.87 (talk) 15:27, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arthur Smith 

message: The article says the 2006 rebroadcast of the 3rd series may have had a missing episode. Surely someone knows whether this was broadcast the first time around? Jooler 22:11, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing episode
Talk:Outflow (meteorology)

message: @Gmail 1999
Ayanda 41.116.85.82 (talk) 19:48, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nation weather
Talk:Licinia gens

message: , is there supposed to be a merge discussion somewhere else? The merge template was lil' malformed , but there doesn't seem to be anything that corresponds to it in any case?
For what it's worth, I support a merge of the family tree into this article. It's a big tree, but then it's a big article, and it wouldn't be overwhelmed. I can't see a good reason for shifting that to a standalone and removing it from its natural context. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 20:13, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The discussion should be on the talk page of the article proposed for merger into this one, not here.  But I'll leave it up to you whether to move it there.  I'm not convinced that adding genealogical tables to gens articles is a good idea.  They tend to be narrowly focused on one branch of a family, and are very distracting when uncollapsed—still a bit distracting from the usual format of the articles when collapsed.  They don't match the formatting of the pages they're being added to, and they frequently omit people for various reasons.  The focus of the member portion of gens articles is on listing, not genealogy; that's why they don't usually mention all of the relationships between different people on the list, beyond providing a filiation (the main exceptions are when the relationship to another person is the most notable fact about someone—or when someone is known entirely from a sepulchral inscription mentioning the person's relatives).  Based on the appearance of the articles in this series that already have charts like this embedded in them, I'd say they're better maintained as separate articles, linked through the "see also" section.  P Aculeius (talk) 00:29, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: It depends. When the gens article is small, or there is only one famous branch, then I think it's fine keeping the tree there. This is not the case for the Licinii though and the tree for the Licinii Crassi is quite large. What I think is more pressing is to remove the list articles on individual branches of a gens, like this Caecilius Metellus, or Lentulus, and make redirect to the subsections of the gens articles. T8612 (talk) 01:47, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

text: Oppose, for reasons already stated above. There are already family trees like this w/ separate articles. Avis11 (talk) 15:51, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge of [[Licinii Crassi family tree]]
Talk:Mattituck station

message: Here's what we get from the Vince Seyfried book "The Long Island Rail Road: A Comprehensive History: Part Six - The Golden Age 1881-1900";
"In the summer of 1869 Charlick sought to buy land around Love Lane from M. Wells, operator of a local saloon and owner of all the land on both sides of the track. Wells refused to sell, for the people would then wait in the station instead of spending money in his saloon. Charlick then bought land at Wickham Avenue two blocks eastward. On September 13, 1869, trains ceased to stop at the former Love Lane stopping place and began to stop at Wickham Avenue. Charles Robinson was contractor for the depot and freight house on the north side of the track, both of which were probably built in 1870. Depot photographed by Brainerd in 1878." 
So if Wells owned all the land around the tracks, how did Charlick get the station set up in 1844? ---------User:DanTD (talk)  00:18, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  History details and disputes 
Talk:Viewing angle

message: Can a camera lens be said to have a viewing angle? At least I'd say it's a different phenomenon. Camera is not a display system, it's an imaging device. These two fields may have same names for some concepts, but the meaning is much different.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.114.94.140 (talk) 08:30, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  viewing angle of a camera lens?
Talk:IKBKG

message: The following was posted to the NEMO (video game system) article. An editor with knowledge of this subject may want to source and add any encyclopedic content to this article.--Muchness 22:28, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: NEMO - is the name of a gene that regulates functions of the immune system. NEMO is like a "master switch" that is found on the cell of the human body and regulates signals between the cell membrane and the cell nucleus. NEMO is expressed in almost all tissue cells. If NEMO is not present, life is not possible. NEMO stands for Nuclear Factor Kappa B Essential Modulator. Nuclear Factor Kappa B or NFKB is the name of the protein that is used for communication between the membrane and the nucleus. NEMO is known to be the pathway of skin, skeleton, blood vessel and other vital signals. For example, the EDA gene is known to dictate properties of the "ectoderm" or last layer of the skin. The EDA gene uses the NEMO pathway to the nucleus to make the "ectoderm" properties present. See [www.cure4jack.org] 
this passage is not well-written  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.191.241.233 (talk) 18:00, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Shifted from NEMO (video game system)
Talk:Hurricane Kenneth (2005)

message: I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of March 14, 2008, compares against the  six good article criteria:
:1. Well written?: Pass
:2. Factually accurate?: Pass
:3. Broad in coverage?: Pass
:4. Neutral point of view?: Pass
:5. Article stability? Pass
:6. Images?: Pass
  If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.</div>— Million_Moments (talk) 20:33, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Successful [[Wikipedia:Good articles|good article]] nomination
Talk:Kaevan Gazdar

message: Please check for any mistakes in quotes etc. due to my imperfect understanding of German. Kochank 22:30, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: checking for mistakes could be accelerated if you were to provide a link to the German source. :) -- Fullstop 09:06, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Xenon (general)

message: might he be the SameAs Xenoetas? Rainer Wasserfuhr (talk) 00:42, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Antiochis

message: Antiochis, daughter of Antiochos III. bore two daughters and three sons (Ariarathes, Holophernes/Orophernes and Mithradates), not one daughter and two sons. Even if it is mentioned in the article, the two sons were (allegedly) not legitimate children of Ariarathes IV. 
Also, Diodorus (31.19.1-8) genalogy is to be handled carefully, but even if he is wrong, the Livius article is still wrong too.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.95.90.155 (talk) 09:24, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genealogy 

message: Thsi page looks like a WP:DISAMBIGUATION, but is not marked as such. Викидим (talk) 04:06, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation?
Talk:Stratonice of Syria

message: You state that she was born circa 320 in the box on the right; however in your article under "Biography" you state "In 300 BC, at which time she could not have been more than seventeen years of age".  
Thanks!
Gemtwist61 (talk) 17:02, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discrepency with birth date.
Talk:List of people from San Juan, Puerto Rico

message: I would suggest it's ludicrous to not consider people like Doña Fela, Sánchez Vilella and McClintock as "sanjuaneros" because they were not born in San Juan.
Doña Fela is a symbol of San Juan, emblematic of the hundreds of thousands of "sanjuaneros" born in towns around Puerto Rico who emigrated to San Juan.
Sánchez Vilella, who lived his whole adult life in San Juan and who served as the city's administrator , is likewise situated.
McClintock is a long-time "sanjuanero" who happened to be born in London while his father was serving the US armed forces, after moving from San Juan and returning to San Juan when his service was over.
May I suggest that a redefinition including people born in San Juan and long-time residents of San Juan is in order.  Discussion? Pr4ever (talk) 01:44, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition of "sanjuaneros" 

message: I suggest that the introduction of this list be rephrased since there many names in it of people who were not "born" in San Juan even though they lived there most of their lives. The current introduction is misleading. Tony the Marine (talk) 21:47, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestion
Template talk:International Criminal Court

message: I think it's best if this template only links to articles about topics that relate specifically to the International Criminal Court.  Articles about topics that relate to international criminal law in general are best linked from the international criminal law template; it's wasteful and confusing to repeat everything in the ICL template in this template as well.
For this reason, I've removed Command responsibility from this template.  I appreciate that the concept of command responsibility is related to the ICC, but no more closely than human rights, universal jurisdiction, the Lord's Resistance Army, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, and hundreds of other topics.  If we link to every single article that is in some way related to the ICC, the template will be useless.  Sideshow Bob Roberts 01:35, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What to include
Talk:Reach Limited

message: After having been approached by Joy, I'm leaving a message to explain why I deleted this article yesterday. The reason is simple; according to CSD:A7 all articles have to assert the notability of the subject; and at  the time of deletion] the whole contents of the article was: 
REACH Global Services Ltd. is an Hong Kong company that operates undersea cable/Internet backbone in Asia-Pacific.
REACH was a joint venture between Telstra and Pacific Century Cyberworks (PCCW). It went bankrupt at one point but it is financially stable in 2005 onward.
which to me didn't appear to comply with the notability requirement. If for nothing else, someone have later added that they operate a 10,000 kilometer long cable network, which to me would fulfill this requirement. Bjelleklang  -  talk Bug Me 22:54, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Walter Lafferty

message: [gold mine. -Pete (talk) 01:08, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources for expansion
Talk:John Bryson Chane

message: I have heard many notable facts about Bishop Chane's meetings and written communications with Seyed Ali Khamenei on BBC and NPR. Why hasn't anyone added this already? Nostalgia of Iran 22:42, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relationship with Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei of Iran 