lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:World Straight Pool Championship

message: According to the wikipedia article Willie Mosconi, there was a World Straight Pool Championship before this millennia, but this article seems to only speak about what seems to be some sort of reboot of the championship in 2006. This article can be improved with a more detailed history of World Straight Pool Championship.   -IPEdits (talk) 07:43, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes there was a world championship in Mosconi's time. But maybe that one should be reserved for another article. FoxLad (talk) 23:47, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  before 2006 

message: The tournaments held 2009 and 2011-2019 were excluded from article because of the lack of sanctioning from the WPA or any governing body. However some users state that the unsanctioned tournaments can be included because of the circumstances involving those events. Rattatast (talk) 23:23, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I see no indication that WP:RFCBEFORE has been exhausted, but you state , so please provide links to the discussions where the matter has reached an impasse. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 11:15, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It's at WT:CUESPORTS#World Straight Pool Championship. oknazevad (talk) 15:29, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

text: Exclude. No sanctioning, no world championship. It's a pretty straight forward objective criteria. Including the unsanctioned tournaments is promotional. oknazevad (talk) 15:32, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

text: Include. The unsanctioned tournaments would be worth excluding if they are totally different events. But they're not totally different events. They retain a number of themes from their sanctioned predecessors. 104.172.112.209 (talk) 22:42, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

text: Include Just because an event is unsanctioned in by governing body, doesn't mean it isn't an edition of the same tournament. Armbrust The Homunculus 10:10, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Rfc on tournaments
Talk:WPA World Eight-ball Championship

message: Someone should merge this article with the winners' list article -- Yandri (talk) 07:59, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: Why did this end? (This needs to be added to the article.) - dcljr (talk) 20:50, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was
Talk:Pomponio Algerio

message: Pomponio died 500 years since but is remembered by me as a martyr and a hero
JSM  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.57.241.227 (talk) 12:52, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I am going to delete the above comment as it adds no encyclopedic value whatsoever.  Any objections?-- φ OnePt618Talk φ   04:24, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Slovakia in the Eurovision Song Contest

message: therefore it should be listed as participating.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.208.86.142 (talk) 13:10, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  slovakia listed as participating on eurovision.tv 

message: Hello! I see a template which is 2011 is underscored (2011)! Please cilck the template's discussion which is underscored to learn more! Or, click to my signature to easy way to find. 81.215.239.22 (talk) 12:21, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Little Problem!
Talk:Co-operative Women's Guild

message: Although I can find no written record of it, I recall that in the 1980s the Co-operative Womens' Guild had offices (it's head office?) at 342 Hoe Street, Walthamstow London E17. The property now appears to be used by a number of local business. Nealc 10:24, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Offices
Talk:George III of Guria

message: I must admit medieval Georgian history is not an issue I know much about, but as far as I can make out Imereti was the larger and more important state than Guria.  So surely those who were monarchs of both, their Imeretian number takes priority.  Length of reign may not clinch it, James I of England is usually known as such, even though he was king of Scotland for considerably longer. PatGallacher (talk) 17:13, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point, but since the guy was primarily associated with the principality of Guria, "of Guria" seems to be a better title. According to Wikipedia:Naming conventions (royalty and nobility): "Where a monarch has reigned over a number of states, use the most commonly associated ordinal and state. For example, Charles II of England, not Charles II of England, Scotland and Ireland; Philip II of Spain, not Philip I of Portugal, although there should be redirects from these locations. When several states are so associated, it is proper and often desirable to give the others compensating prominence in the introduction of the article." --KoberTalk 17:18, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Prince Abdul Azim of Brunei

message: It states in the Death section that Prince Azim had died at the age of 36. This is not true. It even says at the summary on top of the page that he died at 38. 61.6.236.74 (talk) 08:31, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Done Asartea Trick | Treat 08:41, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 24 October 2020 

message: Someone needs to rewrite the sixth paragraph in the Life section. It is completely incomprehensible.100.35.82.153 (talk) 01:17, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Life - 6th paragraph 

message: As I explained in my edit summary , I see no reason to exclude this article from the Wikiproject. I read Talk:Prince Azim of Brunei/Archive 1#Why is the biography of a living person belong to the WikiProject Autism? along with Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive205#Prince Azim and there seems to be a lot of confusion. The inclusion of the Wikiproject tag says absolutely zero about him being affected by autism. It just says he is of interest to the Wikiproject. It's quite likely researchers and advocates who everyone knows are not affected by autism are likewise of interest. Since the current version of our article mentions him speaking in support of those affected by autism and their families in 2 different instances, their interest isn't that surprising. Maybe he's not the most well known advocate although despite hailing from Malaysia originally, I have no idea what the state of play in the region is regarding autism. Maybe the prince was actually a big advocate in the region. In any case, as long as our article mentions some reason for the interest, I see no harm keeping the Wikiproject tag if their members are of interest. I would note that our article now also has a LGBT studies tag despite the issue their being more confusing  in our article. Nil Einne (talk) 04:26, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  If Wikiproject Autism members are interested in the article, let them be
Talk:Prince Rostislav Alexandrovich of Russia

message: This article states that his first wife, Princess Alexandra, as a member of the House of Galitzine, descended from Sophia Palaiologina and Ivan III of Russia.
Ivan III and Sophia Palaiologina have no living descendants- their line died out in the 1600's. The ancestor of the Galitzine family and Prince Rostislav Romanoff is Ivan II of Moscow and his wife Aleksandra Vasilievna Veliaminova. Their granddaughter Anna of Moscow married Prince Yury Patrikeievich, and they are the ancestors of the Galitzines. Also, the sources listed do not show Sophia Palaiologina and Ivan III as the ancestors of the Galitzines. I would like to remove this from the article and have provided below sources that prove my point. Thoughts?
https://www.genealogics.org/getperson.php?personID=I00295162&tree=LEO.
http://w.genealogy.euweb.cz/russia/rurik15.html.
https://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/RUSSIA,%20Rurik.htm#_Toc481496241. 2600:8800:2191:2400:756A:32E5:9B62:89CE (talk) 16:35, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ivan II not Ivan III
Talk:Princess Stephanie of Windisch-Graetz

message: : She is also the cognatic heir of Hugh Capet.
Why Stephanie and not her elder brother? —Tamfang (talk) 08:06, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hugh Capet 

message: Was his name Karl-Axel Björklund or Bjorn-Axel Björklund. The article calls him by both names. 2600:1700:BC01:9B0:D30:3E9A:DF3D:B579 (talk) 22:07, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Husband's name
Talk:Historical and alternative regions of England

message: Im not sure but I think the East Midland region was at one time called the North Midlands and did include the Parts of Lindsey as the East and West Ridings of Yorkshire were in a region of their own I wont put this in until I have verified it Penrithguy 11:01, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Economic planning regions

message: Yorkshirian recently added this new version of an old map to this article; it was removed by Deacon of Pndapetzim and re-added by Yorkshirian.  I'd like to replace it with this map instead, which doesn't use boundaries.    The changes were made to several articles, so to centralize discussion, please post at Talk:Mercia#Map if you have an opinion. Mike Christie (talk) 02:39, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The previous map was incorrect as it shows Cornwall as included in Wessex - this map indicates that this was not the case in 1035.   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:EmpireNorth.JPG  -- William of Malmesbury, writing around 1120, says that King Athelstan of England fixed Cornwall's eastern boundary at the Tamar in 936 after the remaining Cornish had been evicted from Exeter and the rest of Devon in 927 - "Exeter was cleansed of its defilement by wiping out that filthy race". (ref: Professor Philip Payton - (1996). Cornwall. Fowey: Alexander Associates). In 944 Athelstan's successor, Edmund I of England, styled himself 'King of the English and ruler of this province of the Britons' (ref: Malcolm Todd -- The South West to AD 1000 - 1987), an indication of how that accommodation was understood at the time.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.145.175.157 (talk) 18:47, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

text: Removed. -- Dr Greg  talk  18:01, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map discussion 

message: We should probably point out that in their Handbook, the National Trust uses regions exactly as the normal government ones.212.137.63.86 (talk)   10:16, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  National Trust 

message: The guidance includes "dead links should be repaired or replaced if possible. Do not delete a citation merely because the URL is not working. Follow these steps when you encounter a dead URL being used as a reliable source to support article content ..."--Johnsoniensis (talk) 08:57, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead links
Talk:Publius Juventius Celsus

message: I'm mystified as to why all the "I"s were changed to "J"s last month.   The rationale given was WP:COMMONNAME, but that applies to article titles, not text.   Anyway, Iuventus gets 57,700 ghits, Juventus only 48,300. 86.134.217.69 (talk) 19:40, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling changes 

message: * Celsus' name is clearly polyonomous. Need to discuss who Titus Aufidius Hoenius Severianus was.
* Provide sources for the section about Celsus the jurist.
* What is the source for his dates of birth & death?
-- llywrch (talk) 18:53, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  To do
Talk:Putri Raemawasti

message: Evanyuwono (talk) 06:56, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Cannolis (talk) 07:09, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 13 March 2022
Talk:Dafen Village

message: I have a lot more photos of Dafen Village... many more appropriate than the one posted.
Some are here: http://www.flickr.com/search/?q=dafen&w=75362425%40N00
I don't know the best method for sharing these into the article or if such even correct. 
Should I attach the above link as an outside ref or post more photos to the page? Please advise.
...Hey, it's a article about a place and paintings—photos tell a much better story. :-)      
Swoolverton (talk) 16:37, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: So you walk out of Da Fen with a (not "The" )Mona Lisa under your arms and expect it to be the original? Do you need to be told the obvious? 86.174.236.163 (talk) 01:43, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: more photo content

message: I don't find it appropriate to state that "The only requirement is that it is made clear that these paintings are replicas." This may be the official line, but as an art aficionado living in China, I have yet to meet a retailer who has disclosed the replica status to me. Greenonionrangrang (talk) 10:43, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: So you walk out of Da Fen with a (not "The" )Mona Lisa under your arms and expect it to be the original? Do you need to be told the obvious? 86.174.236.163 (talk) 01:43, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  disclosure of replicas
Talk:Pyar Ali Allana

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=story_31-12-2004_pg7_5. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  TreyGeek (talk) 03:10, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Pythodoris of Pontus

message: Hello- As Pythodorida is a fairly important character in Daughters of Isis by Stephanie Dray (Queen Selene's niece), should the book be added into a pop culture section at the end that they seem to often have in articles? I'm not sure.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Applejuiceandpeachh (talk • contribs) 05:30, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleopatra's Daughter
Wikipedia talk:Right to vote

message: this proposal was rejected by the community; see Wikipedia:Right to vote/Proposal--Phoenix 15 11:23, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rejected proposal

message: I have no idea what this phrase is supposed to be referring to. Please elucidate. John Carter (talk) 02:07, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "Official wikipedia membership"

message: Per the reasons outlined in the last discussion.
This proposal still does not address concerns that
*New editors may still contribute useful ideas to discussions and decisions;
*Save for ArbCom elections – which already have suffrage requirements – no Wikipedia processes are treated as straight up-and-down votes;
*Current Wikipedia practices and procedures are still quite good at detecting single-purpose accounts, sockpuppets, votestacking, and other problems; and
*This proposal may discourage newcomers from participating fully in Wikipedia.
Indeed, the proposal is virtually identical to the original, rejected document.  Changes made were to wording rather than substance.  I'll also note that this proposal's chief proponent  doesn't qualify to 'vote' under the criteria that he has proposed. TenOfAllTrades(talk) 02:59, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Still rejected
Talk:Scouting for Girls

message: How do you know its called 'Secret song for Michaela Strachon'? Its apparently going to be a hidden track, at least it is on the Advance that leaked to the web earlier this month. Barnjo 11:24, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Michaela Strachan song

message: Appeared on Graham Norton Show Season 3 ep 9
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Graham_Norton_Show  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.205.31.174 (talk) 04:33, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  show appearances 

message: Removed the assertion that "The trio subsequently became the first British band to have a number 1 single since Coldplay’s ‘Viva La Vida’ in 2008" as it was just plain wrong (Take That, Girls Aloud etc.).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by StargazyPi (talk • contribs) 11:23, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  British Bands at number one 

message: Changed Roy Stride's date of birt to 11 March 1979 from 1980.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.211.83.9 (talk) 15:57, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of bith 

message: LOL @ Criticism. 
Somebody either remove the section or make it look like it was done by multiple people with facts, not one persons opinion.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.158.71.108 (talk) 20:28, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The article needs a criticism section: the band are awful, and many people have said it. They're the poster boys of indie landfill. Look here, for example: http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2009/jan/17/florence-and-the-machine-indie  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.185.9.227 (talk) 21:50, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism  

message: Currently, Summertime In The City redirects here. Can the redirect be changed to Summertime In the City where the actual article on the song is located? Thanks. Also mentioned on talk page of the redirect. —RedScrees (talk) 15:47, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Summertime In The City redirect
Talk:Shillai

message: There is a valley, known as Bella valley famous for dry ginger. This valley includes four villages- 1) Bella, 2) Parli-Forad, 3) Banshwa, 4) Dimti. the valley is 5km away from Shillai. The chief source of income is dry ginger and cash crops. Vins Negi (talk) 07:00, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A little Editing about Shillai 

message: शिलाई गांव का इतिहास 2409:4056:E86:B6A0:0:0:A58A:E900 (talk) 06:02, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shillai gaon ka history
Talk:EWAY

message: This article about a proposed transit system appears to have beed superseded by the Glider (Belfast) article. Belmonter (talk) 19:58, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article superseded?
Talk:BeCogent

message: Created the page with some basic client info, directors, awards and foundation history. Fuji606 11:53, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Page Creation

message: A recent contributor to the page has an admitted conflict of interest (they are a beCogent employee). Just a heads up--RadioFan (talk) 14:40, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: COI
Talk:House of Nassau-Weilburg

message: Charlotte --> Jean --> Henri
That's mother to son to son, which is not matrilineal, it's bilineal.
http://www.gouvernement.lu/publications/grandduc/ap_famille_gdl/ap_famille_gdl_GB_DEF.pdf
Here's a link an official Luxembourg page that says, "Grand Duke Henri, the sixth sovereign
of the Nassau-Weilburg dynasty".  If the Grand Duke considers himself part of a particular dynasty, to which he is related cognatically through his father and his grandmother, why should Wikipedia presume to say that that is not the dynasty to which he belongs? Ariadne55 (talk) 21:14, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It went through A MATERNAL LINE. There is nothing ambiguous about that whatsoever, all it means it went from a mother to a son at one point. It is very clear. I am convinced that you are just aiming in the dark trying to apply terminology that you do not fully understand. The current House of Nassau in Luxembourg, of which Henri is head, is a cadet branch of the House of Bourbon, of which Henri is a junior member. Wikipedia is not presuming that he is not a member of the House of Nassau-Weilburg but he is descended from it via a female line. Bilineal and bilateral are NOT the words to use. Charles 21:27, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It was Jean's maternal line, but it was Henri's paternal line. What else would you call it when a line has passed through both men and women?  Yes, you are presuming that he is not a member of the House of Nassau-Weilburg when you change the page from saying that he is a member of that house to saying that he is descended from it.  You may consider him head of a cadet branch of the House of Bourbon, but his own government's page says he is "the sixth sovereign of the Nassau-Weilburg dynasty". Ariadne55 (talk) 21:38, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It is still a female line when it is issued through one or more females, meaning specifically that it is not in the male line. He is descended from the first House of Nassau-Weilburg and a member of the second. His own page, of course, will force a POV that may not be in line with genealogical fact. Houses describe groups of agnates. Henri and his grandmother are not agnates because Henri is a female-line (note, not direct female line) descendant of her agnatic ancestors. I consider Henri to be head of his own house while still being a junior member of another. The same is true of the Windsors with regard first to the House of Wettin and then to the House of Oldenburg. A dynasty and a house are not the same thing, by the way. Charles 21:45, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with Charles, this should be chnaged back to in the female line. Note that it's only in theory his own government, we the people have a little more say than he does.--Caranorn (talk) 22:06, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  House Name