Talk:List of telecommunications companies

message: I don't see how *IDT really fits in this list. Niteowlneils 06:16, 3 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: But network operator shouldn't redirect here, it should go to it's own article, with a prominent link here.  Mathiastck 13:49, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  great page 

message: Most of the external links should be removed per WP:EL, WP:SPAM, & WP:NOT#LINK --Ronz 03:34, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed. --Ronz 19:44, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Linkfarm

message: I propose all entries that do not have their own article be removed per WP:LIST, at least until we come up with better list inclusion criteria. --Ronz (talk) 22:36, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've started cleanup. --Ronz (talk) 18:27, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: List inclusion criteria

message: It's bugging me that incomplete data with .... in them are listed.
Could someone please hook up the ITU Operator code numbering so we know who the operators are (at least GSM/Mobile/CDMA/AMPS)
thanks
Dr R Azrin (talk) 20:07, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs to counter check 

message: Being a service provider only, should Mobile virtual network operator companies be listed? I'm leaning toward removing them. --Ronz (talk) 17:00, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. JFDI. --Biker Biker (talk) 17:17, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm going ahead with removing them and the fixed virtual operators, which I assume are similar enough. --Ronz (talk) 21:01, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

text: What about VoIP providers? --Ronz (talk) 21:03, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Should this list include mobile virtual network operators at all?

message: I'm inclined to keep subsidiaries of notable operators as I did with Nedjma. Any objections or alternatives? --Ronz (talk) 15:21, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Subsidiaries of notable operators

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on List of telephone operating companies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130304164953/http://wimax.irancell.ir:80/ to http://www.wimax.irancell.ir
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:10, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: These statistics for each country are outdated (from as far back as 2010) and unsourced. I'll give these a few weeks, if nothing is improve they should all be removed. Ajf773 (talk) 04:27, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of fixed & mobile users in each country 

message: Although it is common to rate relative size of companies in any industry by annual revenue, that causes problems with this list. First, probably biggest problem is, the revenue data for all these companies in all these countries are not reported regularly in respect to each other. That makes keeping this list nearly impossible to maintain accuracy. Second problem is comparing companies based on revenue when services offered are different and monetary values from country to country are different. A better way to gauge size and lend to accuracy is to count number of subscribers of specific communication types. For instance, a telecom that has more landline subscribers is not necessarily larger than a company with more VoIP or Broadband subscribers. The list would be more accurate if it were subdivided by service type and then size comparisons by number of subs in that service type. My guess is, in that case, China and India might move up on the list significantly while AT&T might move down significantly. Thoughts??? TadgStirkland401 (TadgTalk) 04:30, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi  - I realize you posted this last year but I just read your comment now. You make great points but getting that kind of reliable data is even more challenging than revenues, and since the services and technologies are changing so fast in this industry (landline, mobile, cloud, etc.) it that trying to rank them by below-the-line attributes would ultimately lead to dead-ends or stats that are not meaningful. Especially since the perceived value is no longer so much the connection itself as what you do with it but there remains undeniable real-world value in those connections (there's still much consolidation happening to capture them). The markets sort these companies by revenues because it's a tried-and-true summary measure of all the chaos, jockeying and services underneath. If you can figure out how to hunt it down reliably, perhaps the kind of data you're thinking of could be on other Wiki pages... e.g., a listing of leading UCaaS/VoIP players in that page/section, etc.??? Just my two cents. Technutt (talk) 17:24, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sort Order of Telecom Companies 

message: There were two companies in the list of prominent US telecom companies that did not have wiki profiles. MegaPath in the $100M+ carrier set and Granite in the $1B+ carrier set. I have been working on a page for Granite that I should have up soon and came back to look at MegaPath. The company was acquired by Fusion, which was acquired by Birch (which already is in the listing), so I deleted that entry. Technutt (talk) 16:46, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  MegaPath Removal from list 

message: Added Granite to table and realized a lot of other data in the table is dated as well. Starting an update on the table. Technutt (talk) 17:47, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Notes: 
* To address currency exchange fluctuations, any entry that could not be found translated to US dollars by a reliable source was translated to $USD based on the closing exchange rate on December 31, 2018 - this is noted at the bottom of the table.
* Telefonica's revenues in the original table entry were incorrect - hence, the large change in revenues between the two entries  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Technutt (talk • contribs) 18:47, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Companies by Total Revenue Table Update 

message: Could this article be split into say List of telecommunications companies in Europe and List of telecomminications companies in Asia & Oceania like the List of mobile network operators article(s)? I think it would make it easier to actually edit AND read when it's broken down like that, obviously the World's largest telecom companies by total revenue section would be kept on the central article with the current name.
Who knows, if this all was to happen then perhaps List of mobile network operators could be merged into this article and the "subarticles." Just an idea, would like to hear people's thoughts on it. Professional Adriazeri (talk) 00:00, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible geograhical-related article split?