lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:There Is No Cabal

message: I mean, aside from the British politician.
Come on. You know what I'm talking about. At least, those who know what I'm talking about know what I'm talking about.
([TINC TINC TINC])
I have no idea what I'm talking about... 03:15, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  So who's Dave Hayes anyway? 

message: I just removed this:
:On Wikipedia, see the appropriate section at Wikipedia:Words of wisdom
While such a link might be useful for articles such as Category (which actually isn't an article but a dab page, so not a very good example) which people new to Wikipedia are likely to try, this is a relatively obscure one which you're unlikely to look for unless it's pointed out to you. See Wikipedia:Avoid self-references. Hairy Dude 13:30, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "Obscure" doesn't sound like a good idea to not link to it, after all people do often come to wikipedia to learn obscure things. And secondly, it is hardly obscure in relation to this article (I came to this article from the other one!). Mathmo Talk 12:13, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't forget meta:There Is No Cabal (:. Bawolff 06:29, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Self-reference 

message: In the interest of the Merger God, I propose that this page be merged with Backbone cabal. If by 2nd of March there has been no further comment on this proposed merger, I shall perform it myself. If you disagree with this merger please vote Oppose here. If you agree with this merger please vote Agree. If you are not bothered or just want the merger to go ahead without turning this into a discussion, please do nothing at all or vote Indifferent and the merger will take place on the the 2nd of March. Thank you JayKeaton 22:26, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: There Is No Cabal (TINC). We discussed this at the last Cabal meeting, and everyone agreed that There Is No Cabal. An announcement was made in Cabalist: The Official Newsletter of The Cabal making it clear that There Is No Cabal. The words "There Is No Cabal" are in ten-foot letters on the side of the 42-story International Cabal Headquarters, and an announcement that There Is No Cabal is shown at the start of every program on The Cabal Network. If that doesn't convince people that There Is No Cabal, I don't know what will. --Guy Macon (talk) 04:37, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  TINC 

message: I don't understand this article at all. Maybe I'm too young for this Usenet thing. Also the article is too short for me to understand what There Is No Cabal is..... please expand it. Enjoyer of World (talk) 03:51, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: , the article is just a stub. No one seems interested in expanding it, so you can do that yourself if you like. You can use the search links at the top of this page (under the banners) to help do that. Softlavender (talk) 07:55, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  What
Talk:Telnet

message: I'm perfectly comfortable with the RFC's at the bottom of the article. Telnet was defined by RFC's and revised through RFC's. I think the two warning should be removed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gggustafson (talk • contribs) 21:34, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations 

message: There's an incomplete sentence in the introduction. I'd fix it but I don't know what it's supposed to say.
:"Most network equipment and operating systems with a configuration (including systems based on Windows NT)."
FalsePockets (talk) 01:20, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction 

message: Telnet is used in the login page of many Broadband connections.
Shubhrajit Sadhukhan (talk) 05:20, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: As noted below, not really. Telnet operates at the device driver level. The login is generated by the local operating system. This is the service provided on Socket 23, but is not provided by the Telnet protocol. (This is a common misconception. The facts are much more interesting. That most everyone else saw this as an asymmetric terminal to host problem, but Cosell's insight in 1973 was brilliant and unfortunately not something we see often enough. Jeanjour (talk) 19:01, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Telnet in login
Talk:Trakehner

message: What does warmblood mean in reference to horses?  --rmhermen
:I'm not sure about the etymology, but warmbloods include almost all of the breeds normally used for dressage and often eventing -- Holsteiners, Trakehners, Hanoverians, Oldenburgs, Dutch Warmbloods, etc.  They tend to be a real handful, but are great for a disciplined rider.  They also have the temperament for doing finicky stuff.  Most have some amount of Thouroghbred and Arab, and some, I think the Dutch Warmbloods and Hanoverians, have a bit of draft horse as well to strengthen the legs and give a more powerful head and neck (important because in dressage, looks count).  Trakehners are interesting in that I believe that some of the original stock were stubby mountain ponies.  When I ride, it's an awesome Trakehner-Arab  cross --although I think his breeding comes from the Russian stud, rather than the German one.  Anyway, I digress.  Warmbloods are different from racehorses and draft horses.  Some are used as working horses, but for carriages, not big carts or wagons.  Now, I'm at the end of my knowledge -- can't tell you more without soing some research.  Hope that helps! JHK
The term warmblood comes from the  German classification of horses, being 
1Fullblood = Thoroughbred and Arabian Horses
2Coldblood = Draft Horse
3Warmblood = Riding horse with some " Fullblood" i.e a mix between 'hot' and 'cold'
Horsemount Stables Trakehners, Ireland Horsemount 22:02, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tupolev Tu-144

message: At the end of Engines it says "The Kolesov RD-36-51 had an unusual variable con-di nozzle for the nozzle pressure ratios at supersonic speeds. Without an afterburner there was no variable nozzle already available. A translating plug nozzle was used.".
And, Did the Tu-144D need afterburner during Mach 2 cruise (as with the NK-144 engines on the Tu-144S) ? - Rod57 (talk) 17:44, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does it mean "Without an afterburner there was no variable nozzle already available." 

message: As far as I can make out, the most important model was the Tu-144S. Nine of these were made and they were the only ones used for commercial passenger services.
However the specifications at the bottom of the article are for the later Tu-144D.
I think it would be interesting to have the Tu-144S specifications, which were quite different. 88.87.126.220 (talk) 08:05, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tu-144S Specifications 

message: A template I added to "Failure to acquire western technology" was removed by an IP, which was probably a good call. I'd like to preserve the reason from the removed template here as the section could use an improvement if a source with more details about French-Soviet collaboration emerges:
"This section appears to entirely rely on a single Aviation Week article as cited in Moon, 1989. The aircraft designers describe the plans for bi-directional exchange in technology between Tupolev and Aerospatiale, which were never implemented due to both Concorde and Tu-144 production ending. According to them, it was a result of a permanent workgroup set as a part of the technology exchange within the French-Soviet Aviation Industry Group, rather than a one-off request to fix the airplane before the Olympics [as interpreted by Moon]. Aviation Week mentions the existence of the group as well, but unfortunately doesn't offer any more details of its activities overall." PaulT2022 (talk) 11:31, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Failure to acquire western technology 

message: I think it is misleading to use the TU-144D specifications as the primary specs. People will inevitably compare passenger TU-144s with Concorde and come away with a false comparison. The TU-144D was a freight only aircraft and only a couple of TU-144D were constructed and were very short-lived.  The in-service TU-144S specifications should be used. Completeaerogeek (talk) 01:59, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  TU-144D specifications
Talk:Area code

message: The usage and topic of  is under discussion, see Talk:Areekode -- 70.51.44.60 (talk) 04:16, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: "areacode"

message: Show me the code the verification WhatsApp code the cell to the number show me 105.112.60.53 (talk) 00:37, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  +58 424-8498661
Talk:Theorem

message: The sentence "A notable exception is Wiles's proof of Fermat's Last Theorem, which involves the Grothendieck universes whose existence requires adding a new axiom to the set theory" is completely misleading and should be removed.
First of all, even without entering a technical discussion, it cannot be in the second paragraph of the page, giving the idea that this is an important point. FLT is proved in any reasonable mathematical sense, it is accepted by the mathematical community without any doubt.
Moreover, the sentence is almost entirely false, see for example all the discussions in https://mathoverflow.net/questions/35746/inaccessible-cardinals-and-andrew-wiless-proof. It's not true that "many specialists think that it is possible [to remove the use of Grothendieck's universes]". The reality is that all the specialists that care about this have checked and are sure Grothendieck's universes can be avoided here, and those who don't care simply don't care about logical foundations.
===Removed by me as WP:OR ===
I removed the sentence "A notable exception is Wiles's proof of Fermat's Last Theorem, which involves the Grothendieck universes whose existence requires the addition of a new axiom to the set theory." as WP:OR.  The author is free to revise to include reliable external references. Erxnmedia (talk) 12:52, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grothendieck's universes 

message: I removed the sentence "A notable exception is Wiles's proof of Fermat's Last Theorem, which involves the Grothendieck universes whose existence requires the addition of a new axiom to the set theory." as WP:OR.  The author is free to revise to include reliable external references. Erxnmedia (talk) 12:52, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed by me as WP:OR 
Talk:Torque

message: The symbol for torque should be upper case gamma for the following reasons:
1. It looks like a handle. Something one can turn
2. Lower case tau is used for other things
3. Upper case gamma is not used for anything else in introductory physics courses. 
4. American students recognise upper case greek letters because of sororities and fraternities. Chem1885 (talk) 09:10, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The symbol for torque
Talk:The Bell Curve

message: Of course the synopsis of a book always relies on one source. Why warn readers about that ? It is silly. 142.189.246.116 (talk) 17:38, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  This book synopsis relies on a single source. 

message: According to Gould, the book authors assume that intelligence must be:
#reducible to a single number
#capable of rank ordering people in a linear order
#primarily genetically based
#essentially immutable
But author Charles Murray said he made no such assumptions
Should we leave it at that? Or can we quote the passages which Gould claims indicate such assumptions? 
And on the other hand, are there any passages in the book which refute Gould's claim?
--Uncle Ed (talk) 14:48, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not our role to do original analysis of the text, nor to second-guess reviews by reliable sources. We simply report the verifiable facts, giving competing views due weight. Generalrelative (talk) 14:59, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: What assumptions does the book actually make?

message: Or does this source article  not even mention The Bell Curve? Goodtablemanners (talk) 01:43, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: It does mention co-author Murray once, but in any case the article is cited to demonstrate that the view of "genetic racial IQ differences" is discredited by mainstream science. Harryhenry1 (talk) 02:16, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Even so, wouldn't it make more sense to cite an article that specifically mentions the material in The Bell Curve? Goodtablemanners (talk) 03:22, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Did I miss something...
Talk:Christian theosophy

message: DO NOT Archive this section 
Check out http://www.iep.utm.edu/submit/100-most/
this is a Philosophy subject. Please do not edit the banner to remove these from Philosophy. JEMead (talk) 17:24, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Philosophy 

message: I have fixed the subpage links at the top, but they are still shown as redlinks. Someone should move all of the subpages of "Talk:Theosophy (disambiguation)" to the corresponding subpages of "Talk:Theosophy (Boehmian)" without leaving redirects behind to fix the redlinks. Those subpages were recently moved to the wrong subpage titles by CAPTAIN MEDUSA. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 01:30, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: , referring to this Talk:Theosophy (disambiguation)/Archive 1? ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 01:33, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 01:56, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subpages
Talk:Tachyon

message: See Neutrino. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 10:34, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you talking about the Faster-than-light neutrino anomaly? --FyzixFighter (talk) 19:50, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: They were assumed to be, but it turned out to be an error. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 16:08, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  17 and 28 GeV neutrinos were assumed to be tachyons 

message: Regarding the one that makes it to Reddit and Stack Exchange and such, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthropic_principle#Spacetime that has the tachyon vector situated on the axes of a single dimension (as it is a line) and multiple time dimensions.
Since imaginary time gets a mention elsewhere on Wikipedia, why doesn't it get a mention here? I'm in favour of including some of the various theories and citing them.
Since I'm not Steven Hawking, and the best I can do is copy-paste, I'll leave this here,
"It turns out that a mathematical model involving imaginary time predicts not only effects we have already observed but also effects we have not been able to measure yet nevertheless believe in for other reasons. So what is real and what is imaginary? Is the distinction just in our minds?"
- Stephen Hawking 49.183.10.84 (talk) 16:21, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infographic meme 

message: "In September 2011, it was reported that a tau neutrino had traveled faster than the speed of light in a major release by CERN." Well, not quite. It was reported that a tau neutrino was measured to have travelled faster than light. The most obvious explanation for this anomaly was always inaccurate equipment. Probably no-one at CERN reported that the particle had actually broken the law of special relativity. Shouldn't  we change the text accordingly? Steinbach (talk) 21:46, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  CERN experiment 

message: New experience witp particel,s from magnesium and light 199.47.67.33 (talk) 05:58, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Magnesium light speed  

message: The opening paragraph of Wikipedia's article on Tachyons needs to be challenged.
Causality is not a fundamental law of physics. It is a consequence of Special Relativity applicable only to particles that travel slower than the speed of light.
The whole idea of "grandfather paradox" is based upon careless use of language (by many respected physicists).A detailed debunking of several anti-tachyon myths is published in: Charles Schwartz, "A Consistent Theory of Tachyons with Interesting Physics for Neutrinos" Symmetry 14, 1172 (2202) Charlieschwartz (talk) 15:28, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  debunking anti-tachyon myths
Talk:Tora Bora

message: Edit: Got rid of some vandalism. I think a line about cave demons really doesn't belong here, especially with no citation or anything.
"It is also famous for two american soldiers dying from what the one survivor called "cave demons"." for reference.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.30.238.96 (talk) 03:24, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Love it, love it! Great concept, Larry. -- Ed Poor
----
A question: Is Tora Bora [the name of] a mountainous region in southern Afghanistan, as the entry states now, or is Tora Bora [the name of] a system of tunnels and chambers carved out of existing caves in the icy White Mountains southwest of Jalalabad, as Bowman (2001) writes? --css
----
I'm not completely sure -- the uncertainty is now reflected in the article.'
----
Tora Bora (Pashto: توره بوره, “black dust” ), DUST = DORA and not BORA  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dictionaric (talk • contribs) 18:15, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

text: I have removed the copyvio of something Jack Duggan wrote posted here  Nil Einne (talk) 12:49, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: ...was used here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carpet_bombing  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.252.104.110 (talk) 17:51, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Carpet bombing 

message: At one point in the article we describe the caves as being in limestone, but a little later in the article we say the rock is gneiss and schist. Which is it? Limestone is obviously more plausible as a material for networks of natural caves, but it would be nice to have some authoritative guidance on this. 206.208.104.20 (talk) 17:23, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Is there a geologist in the house?

message: I edited the reference for the sentence Both the British and American press published detailed plans of the base. in the Military Base section. It was there with no name or type, source, etc. I only cleaned up the reference and did not measure the credibility of the already existing reference. P37307 (talk) 08:17, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page Ref edit
Talk:Toruń

message: hello,  there's a lot of discussion and description of Toruń as the medieval city of Thorn in the book "Caprice and Rondo " by noted historical fiction writer, Dorothy Dunnett.  Someone may want to add that to the references sometime. 170.64.73.246 (talk) 21:51, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: "Thorn" is the original name, however the sound example provided in the article seems to be wrong. Unfortunately this guy pronounces a different word, something like "Thron" (which is throne in English). Thorn and Thron are different things. 2001:9E8:AA9A:4200:848B:BD35:39B0:8A6F (talk) 11:43, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another Toruń ref
Talk:Tel Aviv

message: The comment in the "State of Israel" section "scored its first aerial victory..." lacks neutral language as the positive connotation of "scored" makes the reader more inclined to side with one group over the other. Moreover, using words like "scored" in the context of war is problematic because it is 1) insensitive and makes those killed in order to obtain "victory" mere numbers, as though it were a game, and 2) exuberates a sense of excitement and presents a biased, nationalistic perspective on the conflict. The opening sentence in the third paragraph "In the 1960s, some of the older buildings were demolished, making way for the country's first high-rises" lacks context and uses language that could lead readers to believe the reason the unspecific "older buildings" were demolished is due to the fact that they were old, essentially taking the development of high rises out of the context of war. The tone of this entire section must be neutral and devoid of nationalism in order to be an effective resource. Matthew Dottor (talk) 06:57, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biased diction and tone in "State of Israel" section, general need for neutral language 

message: This line in the lede seems outdated. A quick look at the source shows that it comes from a 2022 Survey, The 2023 version of the survey puts Tel Aviv at number 8.
Can someone update or remove the sentence claiming Tel Aviv has the highest cost of living in the world from the article's lede, in order to reflect the newer data? JohnR1Roberts (talk) 00:29, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The city currently has the highest cost of living in the world.[13]" 

message: according Globalization and World Cities Research Network 84.110.218.178 (talk) 09:44, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: ? Peace Love10 (talk) 09:08, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Can somebody change it? :) Peace Love10 (talk) 09:08, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alpha - City not Beta 

message: Akaganhamilton1 (talk) 17:42, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Liu1126 (talk) 18:07, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 5 May 2024 

message: Why the topic was removed? 
and who the hell wrote that “Displacement of Palestinians” ? דולב חולב (talk) 16:14, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why the topic was removed?
Talk:Twin paradox

message: I suggest to modify the last sentence as follows : "This means that biological aging would be slowed in the same manner as a clock, seen from some other inertial frame". --Chessfan (talk) 14:10, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  The equivalence of biological aging and clock time -keeping. 

message: In "Travellers' perspective" crew members calculate time for their (ship) frame from earth's perspective (ship is moving, earth isn't moving). But from perspective of ship's crew they are actually not moving and earth is moving. According to principle of relativity, crew must count that round trip will take t = 2d/v = 10 years (in "Travellers' perspective") and do calculations for "Earth perspective" as εd = 0.6 × 4 = 2.4 light years and εd / v = 2.4 / 0.8 = 3 years. Thus on arriving crew will be older (10 years for them against 6 years for earth) from their perspective. It obviously contradicts what you wrote in the example. 178.140.161.126 (talk) 10:03, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: If, from the ship's perspective, the Earth is moving, then the star is also moving, and in the traveller's frame, the distance between Earth and star is not 2d but 2εd. Also, the content is properly sourced, and discussed at length here above and in the searchable talk page archives. - DVdm (talk) 17:39, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  The distance between initial point of the star and initial point of ship in frame of reference of ship doesn't change. Star/earth just travel to ship and away this distance. All changes in time happen on earth/star and distance between star and earth changes in the earth frame. Do you understand what is invariance of inertial frames of reference?178.140.161.126 (talk) 11:51, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  As I said, see here above and in the searchable talk page archives. The content is propely sourced. We cannot discuss the subject here per wp:Talk page guidelines. Try our wp:Reference desk/Science. Additional warning on your user talk page. - DVdm (talk) 12:13, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Specific example" wrong logic 

message: I removed the phrase "as the effect still applies to a theoretical observer that can invert the direction of motion instantly, maintaining constant speed all through the two phases of the trip
" and added the two-observer scenario instead. Acceleration is the change in velocity per unit time, not the change in speed per unit time. An observer inverting the direction of motion instantaneously is experiencing infinite acceleration at that point. PAR (talk) 07:25, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Instantaneous turnaround implies acceleration