lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Napoleonic Wars casualties

message: This article has great potential it would help to have pictures/paintings, redirections from your references to accurate websites or books and such.--LORDoliver † (talk) 01:40, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: The Article

message: 311,806 British dead or missing
I wonder how many of the 'British' soldiers mentioned here were in fact Irish?
Inchiquin (talk) 06:02, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  311,806 British? 

message: This page should either be renamed as "Napoleonic Wars fatalities" or data should be added for other casualties: injuries, displacements, incarcerations, etc.  Casualty does not mean death.  68.164.39.34 (talk) 15:23, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Definition of casualties

message: Source? --68.209.227.3 (talk) 06:58, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Russian losses 

message: According to this demographic study, p.8 http://www.uclm.es/ab/humanidades/profesores/descarga/manuel_ortiz/crisisregimen.pdf, the number of Spanish deaths among 1809-1813, this means not counting 1808, neither 1814, goes to 586,281 people. This number is based on the excess of deaths in comparation to the period 1787-1807.--Bentaguayre (talk) 00:45, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Spanish losses

message: Should we strip out the Tom Philo figures? It's already marked unreliable, and yet the numbers are given a lot of precedence in the current article, over and above more reliably cited figures... And he doesn't cover the same period as everyone else, either. I'll be bold and make an attempt to minimise them at least. Fangz (talk) 19:04, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Philo figures
Talk:Neil Simon Theatre

message: My rewrite of this article is a work in progress as I have time. I plan to use a format similar to what I used for the Mark Hellinger Theatre. Please be patient.
Thanks. JGKlein (talk) 19:53, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  My rewrite of this article is a work in progress. Please be patient. 
Talk:Rate of fire

message: If chain guns have speeds higher than machine guns (claimed at 1000-1800RPM), then why would it "reach" a mere five rounds per second? That's 300RPM.
: Maybe it is supposed to be 50 rounds per second. Uwilldrop 10:30, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  I suspect the problem is an apples-to-oranges comparison. The machine guns referred to there are mostly 5.56 and 7.62mm weapons (e.g. 550 rpm for the M60 machine gun, 1000 for the M249 Squad Automatic Weapon from an M16 magazine). But many chainguns are 20-30mm cannon, which is going to slow them down a lot (e.g. the M242 chaingun, a 25mm weapon with a cyclic rate of 100-200 rpm). All the smaller-caliber chainguns I could find are also multibarrel, which gives them extremely high rates of fire. I think it's probably less confusing if I just remove the chaingun reference there. --Calair 03:26, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:Inga–Shaba HVDC

message: This article is terrible.
1. The whole article is written from the perspective of an engineering feat, rather than as a thing. It's not an event - it's still there.
2. More specifically, the introduction is ridiculous: it doesn't talk about what Inga-Shaba actually is - it seems like more of an advertisement for a contracting company. It should say that it's a power line running from Kinshasa to Shaba, that it carries 560 megawatts, that it was completed in 1982. It shouldn't mention generals, negotiating skills, and so on.
3. Needs a picture - I think might have a picture of one of the relay stations I can upload. Will check.
4. Inconsistent detail level
5. Needs sources, especially for phrases like "mostly disenchanted technocrats from Tractionel"
I'll do what I can to dig stuff up to help, but I'm sure a lot of people know a ton more about tropical power lines than I do.
icambron 18:56, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problems with this article 

message: What are the intermediate switching stations for? As this line is operated in bipolar mode, it is not possible to paralellize transmission when a fault on a single line occurs. 
''
*Easy reply: When a fault develops in a line, with earth return electrodes installed at each end of the line, approximately half the rated power can continue to flow using the earth as a return path, operating in monopolar mode. The switching stations provide this capability as well as add'l functions.
And as I know, these stations do not offer a static inverter for power supply of surrounding areas.
''
*Yes, you're right...  The cost of providing power at or near the site of the switching stations would have been prohibitive for the Zairian Government at that time. So, they opted for a simpler model without static inverters. The only inverter station was in Shaba, at Kolwezi, of course.
*What have you done with all the REFERENCES and INTERLINKING TECHNICAL PAPERS...? Why did you delete them?
::Please see this page and clean up the external links:  How To Link. The user should have some sort of idea of what they're clicking on.  Plain URLs are not sufficient.  Also, the double spacing is unnecessary.    You don't have to do it forthwith and I apologize for my semi-literate leanings.  --Omarcheeseboro (talk) 16:12, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intermediate Switching Stations
Talk:Achomawi

message: I have upgraded this article to start class as I believe it has enough information to qualify. Marcia Wright (talk) 13:33, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

message: This article needs to tell about the traditional religion of this tribe.
Gringo300 29 June 2005 04:06 (UTC)
:: yes, please write it up. peace – ishwar  (speak) 08:51, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  Unfortunately, I don't know much about it, so far. But I plan to learn about it... Gringo300 (talk) 22:10, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  religion 

message: This article used Harvard references (as shown under Population section) whereas I do not. Should I rewrite the Population section so the whole article is consistent? Marcia Wright (talk) 13:42, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Harvard style references 
Talk:Vai people

message: The article needs to tell whether or not these people had and/or have a traditional religion.
Gringo300 29 June 2005 04:09 (UTC)
There should be a source for the claim that Vai is an "egyptian langauge".  It is classified as a Mende langauge, not even in the Afo-Asiatic family, let alone Egyptian.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.96.172.191 (talk) 03:37, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In the "Religion and spiritual belief" section, in the sentence "Most of the Vai are very superstitious and some practice witchcraft", the term "witchcraft is ambitious and does not indicate what it actually represents. The term witchcraft should be removed and replaced with at least a brief description of the belief system, and it would be preferable  to have a properly scientific representation. brill (talk) 19:31, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. I've started alterations and will expand + source it. Mabande (talk) 22:20, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  USe of "witchcraft" 

message: Nope; 67.87.150.2 (talk) 12:52, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hi. 

message: Liberia 41.57.95.154 (talk) 19:52, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name the 16 Tribe of Liberia and their dress code 

message: Mai Padmore (Edith Mai Padmore, nee Wiles) was also of Vai heritage. She spoke the language. she has a Wikipedia page. 2607:FB91:1C1B:EA0:5DCA:F312:C49F:AFA9 (talk) 06:49, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Others of Vai heritage
Talk:Sri Lanka Armed Forces

message: , please see MOS:UNDERLINK
"In general, links should be created for:
Relevant connections to the subject of another article that will help readers understand the article more fully. This can include people, events, and topics that already have an article or that clearly deserve one, as long as the link is relevant to the article in question."
This is not a controversial addition, so I am adding it back as per Wikipedia policy, which is absolutely clear on these matters. Oz346 (talk) 08:28, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: It is a controversial addition, the above RFC as concluded it as it is. You are going beyond it. Cossde (talk) 15:00, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think it is controversial to put a mere link to the topic page of the actual incident. But I've requested a third opinion to solve this impasse. Oz346 (talk) 15:11, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Then why did you revert my change, without going to a third opinion? I request you to refrain from edit waring. Cossde (talk) 15:20, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I reverted your change, because it makes no sense. Does every edit need to be approved by rfc to be added? I'm going to third opinion now, because you still have not provided an adequate reason for removal of the link, and it is clear we have now reached an impasse, as you refuse to budge from your position. I could not assume that you would still disagree. Before going to third opinion, there needs to be a talk page discussion. Oz346 (talk) 15:29, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

text: Although I don't agree with your view on the matter, I will respect it and let this stand. Cossde (talk) 16:08, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: link to peace keeper scandal full article
Talk:Vaccinov

message: I found a great external link (http://85.1911encyclopedia.org/J/JE/JENNER_EDWARD.htm) containing lots of information about this topic. As it's from the 1911 edition of the Encyclopædia Britannica, it should qualify as public domain; however, the website has a strict copyright policy:PRIVACY, DISCLAIMER & TERMS: PLEASE READ - By printing, downloading, or using you agree to our full terms. Review the full terms by clicking here. Below is a summary of some of the terms. If you do not agree to the full terms, do not use the information. Since this information is from 1911 it is outdated and contains many OCR errors (typos). It is for research purposes only. The information is "AS IS", "WITH ALL FAULTS". User assumes all risk of use, damage, or injury. You agree that we have no liability for any damages. We are not liable for any consequential, incidental, indirect, or special damages. You indemnify us for claims caused by you. The Contents (see License Agreement for definitions) of this site are licensed only for the personal, household, educational use by a single individual. Although linking to this site is encouraged, reproducing Contents on another site or redistributing Contents is forbidden. Taking Contents from this site and editing it and posting it on another site is forbidden and will result in swift legal action. You may not copy, modify, publish, transmit, participate in the transfer or sale of, reproduce, create new works from, distribute, perform, display, or in any way exploit, any of the Contents of this site in whole or in part. This site and its contents are © 2002-2003 by LoveToKnow, Corp. Click here for Privacy PolicyApparently, they have edited the content enough to proclaim copyright ownership over it.   ‡  Jarlaxle June 29, 2005 04:48 (UTC)
===Note===
The above website is no longer available  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.200.58.47 (talk) 03:12, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The above website is no longer available  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.200.58.47 (talk) 03:12, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Note
Talk:Fürth

message: Why do we have a revert war on this?  On the premise that it's better to include more information than less, I'm reverting to the version where it's included, but if someone can explain why it should be otherwise, I'll gladly change my mind.  --Leifern 11:23, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Umlaut template 

message: Minor grammatical changes as requested via the portal. The article is already in pretty good shape. Kudos. >>> --Scriptor Rex 19:02, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proofreading - English 

message: The article about Fürth says „By 1840, there were 2535 Jews living in Fürth, more than half of all Bavarian Jews“. The first part of the statement is correct whereas the second part is completely wrong. In 1818, there were 42.738 Jews in Bavaria and in 1867 36.798. The number of Jews in Fürth was always much less than 10%. In 1818, 81.3% of the Bavarian Jews lived in Franconia, only 3.5% in Upper Bavaria, Lower Bavaria and Oberpfalz. The remaining 15.2% in Swabia. So there were almost no Jews in what was traditionally Bavaria.
Anyway, the sentence should be corrected in a way to point out that Fürth was by far the most numerous Jewish community in Bavaria. TXDegnaisch (talk) 13:59, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jews in Fürth
Talk:Comic strip switcheroo

message: In the early or mid 1990s, the student newspaper of UT Austin had its cartoonists switch strips, don't recall if it was on April 1st though.  Esquizombi 02:09, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Those sorts of switches and guest appearances are still pretty common (as noted) - if there are online references, feel free to add them. --JohnDBuell 02:19, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

text: I don't know if a school newspaper is notable enough to mention. -Unknownwarrior33 07:26, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Might be if they go on and have syndicated comic strips. --JohnDBuell 15:15, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: But is that the case here?  If so then I'd recommend making it clearer, but I honestly don't know. -Unknownwarrior33 19:53, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As always, we'd need independently verifiable and specific examples first. --JohnDBuell 00:21, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Prior or subsequent switches?

message: :
I seem to recall there being 4 strips that participated in this little trick. I don't remember what the 4th was. Anyone else remember? I think maybe Luann, but I'm not sure.
: Well it's not Luann. Note btw that the dialogue is similar but not exactly alike. —Tamfang (talk) 05:03, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wasn't there another? 

message: Nowhere on this page is it stated what this "Comic strip switcheroo" actually was.  There are hints and implications only.  That needs to be in the first paragraph, probably first sentence.  121.45.203.91 (talk) 00:19, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. 167.206.122.66 (talk) 19:21, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Basic article content failure
Talk:High Point (New Jersey)

message: There are many High Points. "High Point" should be directed to the disambiguous page, from there, users can select any one of many High Points, including "High Point Mountain, New Jersey"
:This was taken care of a while ago.-Dmz5 09:12, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ttile of subject is vague 

message: This article is about three different things (1) High Point as a geographical feature, (2) High Point State Park, and (3) the High Point Monument. They should be divided. I would propose the following:
1 - High Point (New Jersey) should redirect to Kittatinny Mountain, which I am presently revising and where a discussion of this promontory on KM will be added.
2 - The material on High Point State Park (which currently redirects to this article) ought to be sent over to the redirect article.
3 - A separate article should be created for the High Point Monument which would essentially be either (a) a stub and the content added to a High Point State Park article, (b) a redirect to the High Point State Park article or (c) a complete article on its own.
Consider and discuss. --JackTheVicar (talk) 22:18, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Resolving Confusion
Talk:Logan Marshall-Green

message: I placed citation tags on those parts of the article needing references. No tag should be removed without putting a verifiable and reliably-sourced reference in its place. We cannot allow uncited information to be allowed in the Biography of a Living Person (WP:BLP). The criteria for inclusion is higher than normal articles because incorrect information can damage a person's reputation and open WP up to massive litigation. 
As well, this Discussion area is not a forum to discuss how dreamy you think he is, or his ridiculously bad haircut. This area is reserved for discussing the article alone. Please remember that. Cheers! - Arcayne (cast a spell) 22:16, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Um, though I agree with you, Arcayne, that this article requires sources, this is a bit excessive.  I believe you got a bit carried away with the fact tag. ;)  I've reverted and placed the  template at the top of the page for now, which covers everything, but I'm sure a majority of this information is available and just a few Google searches away.  I also re-added the IMDb tag, as it's not a reference, but an external link, which is suitable for actors and filmmakers.  María (críticame) 00:58, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Absolutely. While it is important to have refs, it's silly to put a  tag after every statement.69.241.105.242 23:10, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I guess you are both correct. Next time, i will jsut remove uncited data, as the critewria for BLP allows. And no, Imdb is not suitable for anything in wikipedia. I will be remmoving it again. Sorry if it seems harsh, but putting a  template on the page doesn't let editors know where the uncited info is, and the article stays uncited for longer than the fact tags do. If the majority of this info is a google search away, perhaps the best use of the time would not to complain about the fact tags, but to do something about it instead. Wouldn't you say? - Arcayne (cast a spell) 01:36, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

text: I am thinking that perhaps my comments above were a bit too harsh. Let's put my statements to the test: After I placed the cn tags, less than five day after that, someone removed one of the the cn tags and replaced it with info. Lets see if the all-encompassing reference tag accomplishes the task better, and catches all the uncited text. - Arcayne (cast a spell) 01:46, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations Needed
Talk:Leonhard Rauwolf

message: Some suggestions for improvement as the article is expanded:
*Template:Infobox Scientist should be added 
*Portrait should be added from a source with a free license, if available
*Article should be divided into appropriate subheadings
*References should be converted to inline format
*External links present which could be used to expand article
Espresso Addict 02:39, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Review comments
Talk:Lee Young-ae

message: There are several errors in the English here. In some cases it's difficult to correct the English as the meaning is unclear.
what your adres  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.12.75.11 (talk) 15:02, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Poor English

message: I don't think I like the intention of including links to blog entries within the article. Instead of it, there should be a reference to some written reliable sources of the information. The blog entries no matter the interntion seems to be a way to increase hits to the blog. What do you think? This has become messy to be honest. Realdan (talk) 16:24, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links 

message: Is it true that she was invited to Pyongyang and that she gave birth to a child fathered by the great leader himself?  If anybody has any source to back this up, I am very curious to learn more.  58.146.165.94 (talk) 13:50, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  kim jung-il's baby 

message: Iran is a part of asia--82.134.154.25 (talk) 05:10, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outside of Asia ?! 
Talk:Lee Kyung-hae

message: In 2022 the Dutch Australian artist homesick_skippy released a song called The Ballad of Ideal Lee commemorating Lee Kyung Hae’s struggle with the WTO having been touched by his life story.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:A453:B35A:1:E09C:B22A:813B:677A (talk) 12:18, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Talk:Lee Eun-ju

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 05:51, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: If she was upset of doing nude-scenes in a 2004 movie and killed herself, then why wasn't she upset when she did nude-scenes in her 2000 movie "Oh! Soo-jung"? (Virgin Stripped Bare by Her Bachelors - English title) http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0253378/ Fred26 20:52, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems as though you are all being judgmental of her. I highly doubt that her suicide was strictly due to the stress of filming nude scenes for a movie; the article states that her family was aware that she had been severely clinically depressed and insomniac for awhile. And the culture does have something to do with it, because her parents and family would not help her. In East Asian culture, it's shameful to have mental or physical disorders. Even your own family will not discuss or address it. It was the same thing with Leslie Cheung. ★Dasani★ 04:55, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: Don't any sources mention the emotional impact that the Korean netizen online discussion communities had on her? 125.69.108.174 (talk) 10:35, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Motive
Talk:Lee Chang-ho

message: He would try to play brilliantly. He wasn't told by his teacher to do so. Can 17:09, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Playing style 

message: I would like to know more about what Lee does outside of go; personal life, views, tastes etc. Does anybody have any more information?  SmokeyTheCat  •TALK• 11:28, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personal life 

message: The text on this page and the text on the linked Sensei's library page are very similar.  If they're both from the same author that's cool, otherwise I'm not so sure.  Anyone more familiar with Wikipedia's policy on this want to take a look? 118.208.79.170 (talk) 01:31, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sensei's Library 

message: It is generally agreed that Lee Sedol has surpassed Lee Changho these days. This article has not been added to since 2006 and needs an update. SmokeyTheCat 05:39, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs an update 

message: I think that it should be mentioned that because of him, more importance started to be given to the endgame:
http://gogameguru.com/top-20-go-players-lee-changho-qiu-jun  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jender89 (talk • contribs) 09:57, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contribution to Go 

message: Asian TV cup says it is continental. Asia is only continent that matters. Lee Sedol page lists this under continental but this page includes it in international section.  also lists it as international. I don't know which way it should go, but we should have consistency. crandles (talk) 16:02, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Asian TV Cup 

message: The intro paragraph says that "He is the only player to have won all eight international competitions at least once." However, the Biography section says that "He is only the second player to record a "Grand Slam"."
This seems like a contradiction to me, unless I'm misunderstanding what Grand Slam means in this context -- in which case, I think it should be clarified.
--Zzedar (talk) 20:15, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grand Slam record
Talk:Nordskog Records

message: This page should not be speedy deleted. Please look at the article history. Clearly the seniorfitness.com article is a copyright violation of the Wikipedia article, NOT vice versa.  --Infrogmation (talk) 12:01, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I might be inclined to agree, BUT, two things: 1) It does not say From Wikipedia on the site, and 2) SeniorFitness.com accepts articles from anyone provided the articles are your original content and have not been copied from any other source.  If you can show proof that it is a copy of the article here, then by all means please do so.  Also, I could find no reliable sources to establish the notability of this label.  The page history is irrelevant, the fact that there have been no sources whatsoever added in the 8 years it has been here tells a lot.    ArcAngel   (talk) ) 12:10, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contested deletion