lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Exclusive mandate

message: :This article translation was recently completed. I welcome your input and suggestions for improvement or expansion. This is intended to be an accurate translation of the German original. If you find translation errors, grammatical errors, semantic inconsitencies, punctuation or spelling errors, please correct them; also feel free to leave feedback on my talk page. Thanks - (Patrick 14:13, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

message: *how would you translate "...stabilisiertes de-fact regime" ? (Patrick 15:33, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Questions

message: Do the two governments/states competing in the Cambodian–Vietnamese War apply here? Democratic Kampuchea and People's Republic of Kampuchea. Alinor (talk) 07:31, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cambodia 

message: Should the Ireland example be there?
The dispute between the UK and Ireland was a territorial one where the two states claimed sovereignty over Northern Ireland, not really about exclusive mandates. After Partition, other than Northern Ireland the UK did not claim other territory claimed by the Free State/ Eire/ (Republic of) Ireland. The two countries maintained friendly diplomatic relations with each other long before the Good Friday agreement. The Free State/ (Republic of) Ireland. The Irish Republic/Free State/ Eire/ (Republic of) Ireland never claimed any part of Great Britain, let alone all of it. So this was plain and simple a border dispute- yes perhaps a relatively large one covering 6 counties and a population of 1.5 million, but in principle no different to many other border disputes between neighbouring countries which have maintained friendly diplomatic relations with each other. e.g. various minor border disputes between the USA and Canada or indeed the continuing minor disputes between the UK and Ireland- e.g. Lough Foyle  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.110.24.249 (talk) 21:31, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ireland 

message: The Cyprus/ North Cyprus issue would probably make sense being here I think.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.254.49.154 (talk) 00:18, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cyprus
Talk:Vampire Hunter D (1985 film)

message: Discussion of PAL transfer possibly constitutes original research. 24.46.118.185 19:17, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Original research issue

message: Does anyone know which Phil Collins music video the author is talking about in the note quoted on this page? I searched around for it a little bit, but I couldn't find it.
 CommanderCool1654 16 August 2008
Yeah he's talking about the Don't Lose My Number video, which he claims gave him his "first image of D." I think the translation is screwy though because the first D novel was published in 1983, and Don't Lose My Number didn't come out until 1985. Unless theres some other Phil Collins video that has a red moon, cowboys & katanas...
Heres the video on vh1's site: http://www.vh1.com/video/play.jhtml?artist=1116&vid=47209
--Razdower (talk) 20:50, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Phil Collins music video that influenced Vampire Hunter D?

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 01:28, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]] 

message: Can you add a reception section with critics reviews and box office figures? -AngusWOOF (talk) 18:56, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs reception 

message: "It was one of several anime films featured in the music video for Michael and Janet Jackson's song "Scream"."
It's not. 79.106.203.26 (talk) 17:19, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism
Talk:Allodynia

message: Is sunburn really a valid example for this?
(I doubt it.) 2A02:3036:26B:A188:6E5D:91A0:264B:FC5C (talk) 09:59, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I’d agree that sunburn is not an example - sunburn is an injury and would be expected to hurt with stimulus. The same as if you poked any injury or wound. A better example would be drawing a chopstick across the skin with light pressure and that causing pain. 2A05:5800:279:8300:D023:F2B2:AD12:FAAE (talk) 17:44, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sunburn as example? 

message: The way this whole thing reads, I was waiting for the plug at the end for some magical product that would cure a problem I don’t even have. “Many researchers”?? Really?? And the sun burn thing like someone else said. It makes me think this is one of those conditions like lymes disease that celebrities say they have because they get headaches and exhaustion. Have you people tried drinking more water? Hitting the gym? Maybe it’s just been too long since you’ve broke a sweat, idk. What I do know is that the info about this topic is as suspect as it gets. It’s written like a bunch of bibble-babble-say-nothing that’s trying to lead the reader to believe what the author wants them to believe. Putting my world views aside in regards to the granola medical community, this info needs to be reviewed by an actual neuroscientist who can elucidate which parts are reality and which parts should be subjugated to a Goop article for Gwyneth Paltrow to explain why going to her yoga retreat is the only known cure for Allodynia. 35.142.220.214 (talk) 11:11, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questioning the integrity of the entire page
Talk:Telegraphers equations

message: This page was split from the Transmission Lines page to unclutter the page. I split them today and have just finished editing the page to a level I consider to be satisfactory. I was considering adding a note about how to get from the general telegraph equations to the steady-state equations which have no time-derivative but I can't really be bothered... you do it by replacing the time derivative in the first order equations with j\omega then differentiate both sides and for the lossless line the j's cancel out.
: --Perceptual Chaos 05:21, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Mike McCormack (politician)

message: This entry was originally created by Mike McCormack's son.--Notmicro 05:15, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Note from the creator

message: The title "Mike McCormack (politician)" is ambiguous with Michael McCormack (Australian politician).  Maybe Mike McCormack (politician) should be renamed to Mike McCormack (American politician)?  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:08, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consider better disambiguating
Talk:Walking with a Ghost (song)

message: The disambiguation page is now redundant as both have been combined. Can an administrator please move this page to there? Thanks. Theafroguy (talk) 18:40, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move page to "Walking with a Ghost"
Talk:Northgate, Seattle

message: Summary:  +, cit, so cl, rephrased; see Talk.  MoS  Explication:  See Talk:Seattle, Citing sources.
Note re. Street layout of Seattle provides references for accuracy.  Redundancy may be reduced.  Cf. "Style" section at Neighborhood articles issues
Bug: <ref="multiple, awdevelopment">, etc. DNF.  See "Style" section in Talk:Seattle, Citing sources.
:Are so many references necessary? They appear to be something like three times the length of the article. Also, is it just me, or do I see duplications between the two reference sections (those linked to actual notes and those "manually" generated)? --Lukobe 06:40, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Q&A at Talk:Seattle, Washington#Citing sources, since this applies to articles in general.  --GoDot 03:31, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Style notes 

message: --GoDot 02:51, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: I think the Northgate library is very important to the neighborhood and I would like to add it to this page. Is that ok? ValentinesDay88 (talk) 01:05, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding the library to this webpage
Talk:Area codes 717 and 223

message: We had parts of 717 taken into 610, as well, out around the Berks county line. We had a severely long (multi-year) conversion period to 10-digit dialing for these numbers. --Warphammer 05:39, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Magician (Marvel Comics)

message: Sure he split an atom, but have his powers been determined yet?  We began thinking he had reality warping powers, now it's "affecting molecules at a sub-atomic level" or something similar.  I think right now this is all speculation and all that can be done is state examples of what he's done. Thoughts?  --Newt ΨΦ 00:55, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Powers and abilities 

message: I overhauled the biography, none of which was true.  I have no idea where it came from.  I'm still getting down exactly how this is supposed to read however, so I may have done it wrong.  --Newt ΨΦ 02:50, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fictional character biography 

message: So is he a villian now seeing as in UXM #73 he attacks them.--Dil 09:20, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Villian?

message: This biography needs to be written out of universe.  It's too detailed and all in-universe which could breach copyright and does little, anyway, to discuss the significance of this character. --PsyphicsΨΦ 21:51, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biography again 
Talk:Paeng Nepomuceno

message: Rafael Nepumuceno → Rafael Nepomuceno – {Correction for the surname's spelling -- Perryv 03:48, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
*Support : The Name should be Rafael Nepomuceno not Rafael Nepumuceno -- (peads 03:42, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Add any additional comments
I added the Milan Tribute to this short article which must be developed.
--Florentino floro 06:48, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: :Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
*Support : The Name should be Rafael Nepomuceno not Rafael Nepumuceno -- (peads 03:42, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: :Add any additional comments
I added the Milan Tribute to this short article which must be developed.
--Florentino floro 06:48, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: The previous version of the lead called Nepomuceno "a 6-Time World Bowling Champion". It goes on to say that he has won the World Cup of Bowling four times, the World's Invitational Tournament once and the World Tenpin Masters once. If he has won the World Cup of Bowling four times, he is a 4-time world champion, not a 6-time world champion. But I prefer my version of the lead, which avoids the issues of what constitutes a world championship altogether and simply says what he has won: "He has won the World Cup of Bowling (1976, 1980, 1992 and 1996), the World's Invitational Tournament (1984) and the World Tenpin Masters championship (1999)." Aecis·(away) talk 09:53, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  How many world championships? 

message: The names of his nephews in New York are irrelevant unless they are professional bowlers, I suggest that the reference gets removed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.108.234.192 (talk) 11:46, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nephews 
Talk:Horseshoe Bay, Texas

message: Perhaps this article should contain some discussion about the ads by Texas Home Sites, featuring Chuck Woolery.  I actually only checked the Wikipedia entry for this page because of those advertisements. --MMX 05:55, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Advertisements
Talk:Robert de Brus, 5th Lord of Annandale

message: There is not a trace of evidence that Edward saw the dispute over the Scottish succession as a means of advancing his ambitions to rule the whole of the British Isles.  These ambitions developed in the wake of circumstances.  It is important not to read history backwards, so to speak, from outcomes to causes.
There is, unfortunately, a continuing tendency to misread the whole process by which John emerged as king as part of a deeply laid plot by Edward, reflected in this article.  This does not accord with the facts.  The arbiters most definitely did not stand back while Edward disposed of the kingdom as he would 'with an earldom'.  They gave judgement in favour of Balliol in early November, in accordance with all of the precedents of primogeniture: even twenty-nine of Bruce's own auditors voted in favour of Balliol, underlining the strength of his claim.  The myth that John Balliol-and it is a myth-was deliberately forced on the Scots as an act of English manipulation was given shape at Robert Bruce's first parliament, held at St. Andrews in 1309.
Rcpaterson 05:59, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edward's ambition
Talk:Vanity (singer)

message: When has she ever accessed the whistle register or at least hit E6? Myke 06:01, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Since she was born in Canada, is her father really African-American?  What is his citizenship? User:Zoe|(talk) 22:14, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Her father

message: I doubt that the Anthony Smith listed, who was born in 1983, was married to her in 1995. Anchoress (talk) 01:14, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: this has been corrected.76.245.46.141 (talk) 06:51, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anthony Smith 

message: Casual visitor here, popped in wanting to know more about this person.  This article is one of the best I have read on Wikipedia - coherent consistent style, informative, plenty of relevant detail, overall exactly right.  Please don't spoil it now by over-editing.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.34.218.209 (talk) 08:30, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overall quality 

message: Im wondering if there is wikipolicy or precedent for the best name to use throughout the article. while she is overwhelmingly known as Vanity, she no longer uses this name, so i wonder if Matthews is best. this is not merely out of respect for a living person (though that is part of it), but about how to represent her here. her early career prior to prince doesnt involve this name, and of course she doesnt use it now, but having two names seems really awkward. I will do some research. I see an editor changed some usage of Matthews to Vanity. i wont revert, and i cant even recall if i made any changes to her name.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 07:24, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Best name to use 

message: I changed the section to say "In 2010 ... released" since the website says "THE BOOK IS FINALLY HERE", but when you click through to the paypal link it still says "preorder" and no-one in the discussions on prince.org seems to have received theirs yet.  Maybe someone can re-word it for me.Cancerward (talk) 23:11, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Autobiography 

message: The personal life section states that she undergoes dialysis. However, a few lines later, it says that she has undergone a kidney transplant, which would negate the need for continued dialysis. So which is it? Has she had a transplant or not? David Rush (talk) 03:16, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The two are not mutually exclusive. 98.67.186.26 (talk) 04:22, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Health
Talk:Town (New Jersey)

message: I don't know much about forms or types of government, so I submit this for anyone's approval that's watching this page.  It appears that Newton, New Jersey is also a town type of local government, utilizing the mayor-council form.  Should I go ahead and plop it on this list?  (See: the official website of Newton for more details on their government).  Thanks!  --Rkitko 06:01, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Newton
Talk:Songdo

message: the article opens with a description of position relative to Seoul and describes it as south.  That's just not true.  It is a little south, but it is mostly to the west.  I don't know exact numbers though so I'm reluctant to edit too heavily.  DaronDierkes (talk) 06:32, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  south... 

message: The main photo appears to have been airbrushed to make the sky look more blue. The sky is gray around the buildings, and dark blue away from the buildings. This should be replaced with an untouched photo.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.143.59.94 (talk) 16:04, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Airbrushed photo 

message: Apparently New Songdo City is synonymous with SIBD (but maybe not).  In any case, the photo is labeled "New Songdo City," though that term is nowhere else used.  some-one in the know should clear this up. Kdammers (talk) 11:43, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: it is not so far from the border of seoul. the distance in the article say how many km it is from the center of the city.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.196.166.161 (talk) 07:45, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  west of Seoul 

message: I am pretty close to certain that there was at least one foreign university in ROK before this city was even built. some other statements also seem questionable, e.g., that the streets are wider than usual:  What is usual?  The street depicted does not look wider than hundreds of streets I've seen in Korea and elsewhere.  Also, the transportation section is unclear or wrong:  How does one use the bridge to the airport?  If it is by subway, then only one transfer is necessary to get to Seoul.  The article reads a bit too much like promo (even attend classes remotely.[13] They can control lighting, heating, air conditioning and more, all with the push of a button; elegant). Kdammers (talk) 08:05, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  fact checking 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) – MaterialWorks (contribs) 11:42, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The nomination was initially by Loranchet of just :Songdo International Business District →  but it appeared in WP:RM#Possibly incomplete requests, so I added the part to resolve where Songdo should go. I am leaving this comment here to try to not have WP:TPO apply. Will revert changes if anyone requests. TartarTorte 16:45, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 31 March 2023
Talk:Balboa Island, Newport Beach

message: I used to sail in and out of NB, and told 'many sailing guests' that a lot of the in-bay islands' mass existing in the harbor was the result of dredging back in the early 40's, in anticipation of the USN using Newport as a small port for submarines. I can find NO references to such dredging. (Only the work done by early developers much earlier than 1940.) Anyone else hear the same WW II references? On line links? Thanks.
: My dad is from NB and he says the same thing regarding dredging and the islands. I don't know where you'd find info about that other than word of mouth. --Allie (talk) 07:06, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  World War II Dredging in Newport Bay; added to islands' size(?) 

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage.) Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources.  Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  —George8211 / T 14:40, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Note: the material was copied from Newport Bay: A Pioneer History by Ellen K. Lee, as quoted on http://www.flickr.com/photos/ocarchives/3953741844/in/pool-21986115@N00. —George8211 / T 14:41, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Roy Alexander Gano

message: This article will be greatly enhanced by references to verify its accuracy. Kukini 06:17, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I hope this name is accurate. I just used the name in the article. Kukini 13:05, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Henry Fleuss

message: Search in http://www.altavista.com/ for:-
:"Henry Fleuss" (entered in quotes) found 255 miscellaneous entries.
:"Henry Fluess" (entered in quotes) found 110 entries, which were mostly Wikipedia echoes.
Anthony Appleyard 06:28, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. --KenWalker | Talk 23:39, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment