lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Bowness High School

message: note:  I put in multiple footnotes on Amanda Forbis, since her receipt of the Golden Palm award contrdicts what wikipedia has in the article for the award itself.  IMDB lists multiple awards, the Herald is the reference for one award, and the Herald is also the one reference to say she's alumni at the school.  Since no single source says everything, that's the reson I have multiple (which looks like overkill).  --rob 08:20, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Pollentia

message: The Catholic Encyclopedia and a Dartmouth webpage have this city on an island. However, the 2004 EB version gives the same location has the 1911 version on which this article is based. There is a city named Pollenca/Pollensa on the island, perhaps it is a mixup. -- Kjkolb 08:22, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Location

message: I am a bit puzzled by the refs to amphitheatres, temples, etc. The Blue Guide to Northern Italy fails to mention them, as does the Italian wikipedia article Pollentia and the Italian wikipedia article Bra (not a disambiguation page in Italian). The page on Pollentia at the official Bra site  seems to say that although there were indeed temples, aquaducts, etc., all you can see today—and preferably from the air—is the shape of the amphitheatre as outlined by more recent buildings. I have made the article a bit vague on this. Ian Spackman 03:27, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: All Those Juicy Remains
Talk:Australian Racing Hall of Fame

message: I will try to do so. My intention is to start the ball rolling. Wallie 08:34, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion

message: I think that we should include the year of induction on this page. How do others feel?  MagicFlute1983 11:58, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Year of Induction
Category talk:Information

message: See Talk:Communication/Archive 1#Information. Brian Jason Drake 08:45, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Communication 

message: :Category:Information is a sub-category of :Category:Data. :Category:Data is a sub-category of :Category:Information. Which is the tail and which the dog? — Robert Greer (talk) 14:48, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  criss-cross
Talk:Burr (cutter)

message: After being linked here from die grinder, I expected to see a picture of a small tool covered in abrasive. Instead, I see what looks a lot (although not quite) like a tiny endmill. What's the difference? I see two potential differentiators: random vs. engineered position of cutting edges and existence or lack of flutes to remove chips. —Ben FrantzDale (talk) 14:17, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I've never heard of the abrasive covered mandrels called "burrs", only toothed bits. I usually call what you are referring to as "grinding stones", although I'm not sure this is correct. Wizard191 (talk) 21:33, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  I can't give any official rule for differentiating them (burrs/rotary files versus endmills). I think the factors you mentioned are good suggestions ("random vs. engineered position of cutting edges and existence or lack of flutes to remove chips"), although I am ignorant of any "official" guideline. I agree with what Wizard191 said about the abrasive type—in my region we'd call them grinding stones or grinding bits (I'm picturing the type you run in Dremels or die grinders when I say that—like this one). As for the toothed type, a burr/rotary file is like a hand file in its tooth design—many little teeth rather than fewer larger ones. I don't know how a legal boundary would be drawn on that (would have to be somewhat arbitrary), but if I saw this, I'd definitely call it a "burr" rather than a "small ball-nose mill". Although objectively one could argue that there's no good reason for that. An emic-vs-etic thing, it seems to me. — ¾-10 23:22, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vs. endmill?
Talk:Phil Gould (rugby league)

message: Was Gus a ball playing prop-forward? Alexsanderson83 06:34, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: He might have filled in at prop, but mainly a back rower and five-eighth IIRC.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.161.28.222 (talk) 11:28, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ruprekha Banerjee

message: Most of the Indians visiting this page will know about this person. I don't know much about him since I only saw the last few episodes. Please expand this as well as you can, which will probably be better then what is there right now.--May the Force be with you!  Shreshth91($ |-| r 3 $ |-| t |-|) 09:34, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Qazi Touqeer

message: kak osman  —Preceding unsigned comment added by DanaRahimi (talk • contribs) 18:17, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  osman Rahimi 
Talk:GeForce 256

message: A GeForce SE was also available from at least one vendor (Guillemot, their 3D Prophet card) that had SDR DRAM.  I do not have any other specs. 198.49.81.49 (talk) 18:36, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  GeForce SE 

message: When I got my first GeForce card, compared to the previous card I had, the main benefit wasn't so much its increased speed, but its ability to use things like cube maps and bump maps, which were simply impossible on older Nvidia hardware and on competing hardware of the time. When playing a game that supported those, it looked like more of a leap forward than the article suggests.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.114.146.117 (talk) 18:42, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  How about more qualitative improvements 

message: Is the release date accurate? Various articles seem to imply that it was being released in December 1999 or January 2000.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/429
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/leadtek-winfast-geforce-256-ddr-review,157.html
80.162.33.59 (talk) 18:30, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  DDR release date 

message: The article states: "GeForce 256 was marketed as "the world's first 'GPU', or Graphics Processing Unit", a term Nvidia defined at the time as "a single-chip processor with integrated transform, lighting, triangle setup/clipping, and rendering engines that is capable of processing a minimum of 10 million polygons per second".[7]"
The given source does not support the claim that it was marketed as such. It also points to an outdated link; an archive of the original article is available at the link. But it also doesn't provide that quote.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:A61:111F:1701:9993:82A:9C1B:EAAA (talk) 17:29, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source for "World's first GPU"
Talk:Yellow Ribbon campaign (Fiji)

message: The  template is appropriate, as this extremely controversial piece of legislation is very much in progress in Fiji at the moment.  There have been huge public protests both for and against the bill.  If little has been contributed to the article of late, it's because of laziness/lack of time on my part, not lack of current importance. David Cannon 09:57, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Blue Ribbon campaign (Fiji)

message: The  template is appropriate, as this extremely controversial piece of legislation is very much in progress in Fiji at the moment.  There have been huge public protests both for and against the bill.  If little has been contributed to the article of late, it's because of laziness/lack of time on my part, not lack of current importance. David Cannon 09:57, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Statolatry

message: "STATOLATRIE OU LE COMMUNISME LÉGAL", PARIS, 1848 (!)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 145.236.117.143 (talk) 09:33, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Early use

message: I think the article as it currently is, is wrong in claiming that the Doctrine of Fascism mentions "Statolatry" at all. I know in later works of his, Giovanni Gentile refuted the claim that his ideologies amounted to statolatry, and he opposed that word, though he continued to claim the state was spiritual and even a focal point of the spirit, this was not quite the same as "divine" or worthy of worship in his philosophy. Nagelfar 10:51, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doctrine of Fascism 

message: The term "Statolatry" doesn't really have the root element of "Idol" in it, but simply the Greek "latreia" meaning worship, with the latin "stato-". I will leave it for someone else to change, as the 'Idolatry' link does explain the transposition of worship to some concept such as "a state" quite well, even if it is technically incorrect in this instance that it does not infact combined the "idol"atry element. Nagelfar 11:05, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Idolatry 

message: Can someone add the direct quote from "La dottrina del fascismo" in Italian and the English translation of the passage? I can't find what you're referring to!
http://www.piralli.it/dottrina.htm  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.213.126.2 (talk) 00:56, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where is "statolatry"? 

message: This appears to be a POV fork from the Statism article, as it appears to be about exactly the same topic.--R-41 (talk) 21:48, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Statism and Statolatry are clearly different topics and deserving of separate articles. R-41 hasn't provided any argument that this article is POV and it seems that the POV banner was merely a kneejerk reaction to an article he didn't like so I am going to remove it. MickStep (talk) 11:44, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  This appears to be a POV fork from the Statism article 

message: This article documents the use of the term from a religious and historical point of view, which is very different from the Statism article. So "exactly the same" is false.  But I can see why an article on "statolatry" might irk many (who perhaps hold the state in god-like regard and awe). Wod observer (talk) 03:24, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  hardly a "POV fork" from the Statism article 

message: Not only is the language against Wikipedia standard (having biased language), but no writer can tell the difference in idolatry, and iconography. Iconography is YOUR religion's stuff, but idolatry is everyone else's, right? They worship cloth, you worship symbols qua flag. Laughable.
71.165.247.91 (talk) 00:28, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Laughable
Talk:Durg district

message: with chhattisgarh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Chhattisgarh or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 11:15, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/chhattisgarh workgroup Addition 
Talk:Uppland Runic Inscription Fv1976 107

message: According to the Joint Nordic database for runic inscriptions, the code for this stone was originally "Fv1976 107" ("U Fv1976;107" in their system).  Confirm/deny? --Adamrush 10:19, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible rune code error
Talk:Presidents pro tempore of the United States Senate, 1911–1913

message: Should we just incorporate this article into President pro tempore of the United States Senate, "afd" this article?  I don't know, really.  Just a thought.  —Mark Adler (markles) 19:09, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Note: Don't discuss here, discuss at Talk:President pro tempore of the United States Senate#Incorporating article on Presidents pro tempore of the United States Senate, 1911-1913. —Mark Adler (markles) 19:09, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorporating this article into [[President pro tempore of the United States Senate]]
Talk:Robert Donat

message: is it donat or donath???????????????????? donath was his birth name , donat screen name
:His name was DONAT, see FreeBMD Registered in Chorlton (Manchester) June quarter 1905 Volume 8c page 710
His brothers:
Donat  Philip Ernst,     Chorlton  8c 726 
Donat  William,     Chorlton  8c 721 
Donat  John Emil,     Chorlton  8c 745
I have looked at the BMD for the quarter year April, May and June of 1905 and confirm that there is no Donath registered but there is a Friederich (NOT Friedrich) Robert Donat registered.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by RonIpstone (talk • contribs) 22:01, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Full name

message: Once again I find it a very great pleasure to come to Wikipedia for obscure information about subjects or persons. To those responsible for the information here a very big thank you - from a Robert Donat movie fan.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.169.176.36 (talk) 00:06, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur. Wordreader (talk) 01:23, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tahnk you 

message: The article solely focuses on his film career but he was a stage actor involved in some critically acclaimed performances such as the 1953 performance of Murder in the Cathedral. I don't have sources but hope this post encourages research beyond film. -- GreenC 14:14, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stage
Talk:Matthew Cook

message: This sounds self-written ?
Surely the article didn't write itself....or did it?  
Maybe Dr. Cook should prove whether or not it is possible for this article to be self-writing.
This is my first wikipedia posting. I am distressed by the disclaimer box at the top of the page seems to discredit Matt Cook. The wikipedia is self correcting and this is my attempt to speed up the process.
Full disclosure: I know Matt socially.
Matt corrected some of the mistakes in the article, but he did not write it or ask for it to be written.
The article is self written in the same way that all the other articles on wikipedia write themselves. It evolved.
I am not a mathematician and am not in a position to comment firsthand on the importance of Matt’s work. As a computer scientist I find the fact that something as simple as Rule 110 can be Turing complete both fascinating and important.
It is my lay opinion that the article on Matt Cook understates Matt’s research contributions:
Matt’s proof is the core theoretical result in Wolfram’s magnum opus “A New Kind of Science” in which Matt is recognized as the author of the proof.
Matt published in many fields with distinguished coauthors. Check:
http://www.paradise.caltech.edu/~cook/papers/index.html
The importance of Matt’s contributions is universally accepted in the mathematics groups on usenet.
The contributions section of the article should be expanded and commented on by a mathematician. Since the article is important it should be moved from the category of articles that need their importance to be explained.
*I agree that "the article on Matt Cook understates Matt’s research contributions", which is why I added it to "the category of articles that need their importance to be explained". The fact that he is a mathmematician, and his notable contributions to the file, should be stated first up in the opening paragraph. Then this, as well as his peronal biography, can be expanded. Someone just looking at the article should be able to see imediately who this person is and what he is notable for. - Matthew238 00:27, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Kolkata Book Fair

message: A complete list of Calcutta Book Fair themes would be appreciated. Thanks. 70.17.163.241 11:21, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

message: I have gently trimmed this article. If it continues to grow in size, it may need to be broken into multiple articles. Boxes and tables might also be helpful. Djembayz (talk) 19:07, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gentle trimming of this article 
Talk:Pyroligneous acid

message: Mokusaku seems to be a brand name, or potentionally an anglified version of the Japanese name for wood tar. In both cases I can't see why it should be included. --Tunheim 12:28, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mokusaku 

message: Yikes - surely putting anything containing methanol into your body is a bad idea, in any significant amount? 193.63.174.10 (talk) 13:46, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The content pertaining to medical use was dubious at best, so I removed it.  Pyroligneous acid may be used as a fragrance or food additive for flavoring though (link).  I suppose it is used in very small amounts for this purpose and a little methanol will do no harm.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 21:13, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  medicinal / food use?!
Talk:Office for Strengthening Unity

message: What is this article about?
:I have no idea what that stuff was, so I rewrote the whole article. Vpendse 14:01, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

message: Article has been merged with Office for Strengthening of Unity Between Universities and Theological Seminaries, i.e. I've added text from Office for Strengthening of Unity Between Universities and Theological Seminaries to the article and replaced text in the other article with a redirect. --BoogaLouie (talk) 20:37, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger
Talk:Service of worship

message: I don't think "service of worship" is exclusively Protestant. Certainly Jews refer to their worship meetings as "services" too. Angr/talk 18:09, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is true.  I'm updating the article to reflect that.--Aervanath lives in the Orphanage 18:12, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protestant only? 

message: This page definitely should not redirect to the article on Christian church services; while English Wikipedia users are likely most commonly Christians (statistically, based on demographics in general), "Service of Worship" doesn't necessarily imply a Christian service- just any service in which some religious (or potentially irreligious, really) entity is worshiped. 
The previous article was indeed mostly Christianity-centred, but this was- in my opinion- an error in that article. I was linked here in the context of multifaith worship services from Multifaith Space and redirected to the Christian version, which is kind of contradictory.
This page would best be reinstated as a separate page about worship ceremonies in general, rather than primarily Christian services.  Hppavilion1 (talk) 01:20, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect?
Talk:Mačva

message: A complete (or as complete as possible) list of Bans would be nice. Apart from Dragutin and the Goranskis, there are a bunch of others from that era. 
Some of those I know of: János Maróthy (Ivan Morović) (1397-?), Máté Maróthy (circa 1475?), Imre Héderváry (1442-1445), János Alsáni (~1360?) and his son Pál Alsáni, Dezsö Bánfi of Gara (~1440?), Nicholas Újlaki. 
Anyone know any good sources? --BluePlatypus 19:05, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of Bans 

message: no source given to support name Territory of the Military Commander in Serbia. show this source here. HuHu22 (talk) 16:24, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: Here I will explain my edits - Peacemaker67 is try to promote in Wikipedia name Territory of the Military Commander in Serbia. I looked recent edits in some articles and I see that this name was personally included into these pages by this user. This name almost do not exist in English sources outside of Wikipedia  - . Name that I use instead, Military Administration in Serbia, is used much more -. Also, Peacemaker67 abused one of the references that he promote. This is reference that he use as support for name that he push - Pavlowitch, Stevan K. (2002). Serbia: the History behind the Name. we see that this reference do not use name Territory of the Military Commander in Serbia but instead it use Territorry of the German military commander, Serbia - . Peacemaker67 abuse this source trying to make false impression that name that he promote is referenced. He also placed these 2 references into article bibliography but they are not bibliography for this page. This page is about Macva and bibliography on this page should have books about Macva. Two books that Peacemaker67 placed there are not even distantly connected to Macva and because of that these books are not bibliography for this page. Nemambrata (talk) 14:01, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit warring
Talk:Jennifer Harman

message: There's a page titled Jennifer Harman and another titled Jennifer Harman Traniello. The content is different. Any suggestions on the way forward? Essexmutant 12:11, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge them. I'd choose the Harman one to keep as she works under that name, but that is less important than fixing the problem of having two pages. 2005 00:27, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Essexmutant 09:32, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening comment 

message: "Her initial decision to play poker professionally estranged her from her father. After years of little to no contact, they have reconciled their differences"
Where did this come from?  Reference required, or else this should be removed from the article. MrShamrock (talk) 10:29, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation needed
Talk:Stamford School

message: What is the "evidence to suggest that a school existed from the beginning of the fourteenth century" ?  It's news to me.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.145.152.172 (talk) 12:07, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of Foundation 

message: Needs refs. Alumni good. too many lists Welcome. Victuallers 22:16, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for keeping opinions on the talk page.    --Merovingian (t) (c) (e) 12:16, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Assess

message: I believe the current discussion of badge colours is in error.  I was a boarder at Stamford from 1949 to 1958.  At that time, all students wore a red badge.  The white badge was restricted to "old boys" (alumni).  I hesitate to edit the text because memory can be faulty and the discussion is very detailed.  However if anyone else has a recollection similar to mine, please correct the text. Graham R Briggs. 24.60.161.126 (talk) 20:24, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stamford School badges 

message: Some of the alumni listed under Commerce and Sport (and perhaps elsewhere) could do with a cull.  If they are legitimate can someone state why (as few have their own page), or if not, perhaps remove them as they detract from authentically distinguished individuals?
:I will cut the uncited and not notable if no improvements are made (many need double references; 1 for notability and 1 for alumni status). - ForgottenManC (talk) 17:19, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old Boys 
Talk:Amiga Research Operating System

message: I removed this section because it was not encyclopedic, it was more like an advert. Its removal won't obstruct anyone from obtaining AROS as anyone interested in obtaining it would follow the link to the site at the top of External links and would be able download it and see the information about contributing to AROS etc there.
Please note this edit is purely about what wikipedia is for and isn't intended as any kind of slight against AROS or its supporters or the article - just the opposite, the article merits expansion, for example an  and more background about the project would be good :) GhostGirl 12:27, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of 'Obtaining AROS' section
Talk:Albert T. Church

message: Can someone recite the line on HRW. Right now the link goes to a page on the East Jefferson Levee Authority. Hardly seems related. --JJay 12:31, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Human Rights Watch 