lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Valley of Geysers

message: There are plenty of references on Google News. I urge User:Zzyzx11 to reference the facts that he finds dubitable, rather than throwing tags about. This attitude is immature at best. --Ghirla-трёп- 16:55, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually it is normal and completely acceptable practice to tag articles for referencing if you don't have time to do it yourself. That is the whole purpose of tags. Of course, editors should try to reference stuff properly in the first place that way we could avoid the whole mess. And really, if you are aware of the references then I question why you don't just reference the article and remove the tags rather then complaining about another editor who correctly highlighted the lack of references Nil Einne 06:01, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

text: NB, you may want to check our cornerstone policy Wikipedia:Verifiability Nil Einne 06:04, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: Geyser Valley Trail is in the U.S. state of Washington and does not appear to be connected to the Valley of the Geysers in any way beyond the similarity in names.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.29.251.202 (talk) 20:31, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should the link to Geyser Valley Trail be removed?
Talk:Tribe of Manasseh

message: Time to change the name of the article, although it looks as though  Manasseh and Mannasseh are equally popular on Google Books and Google Scholar. Comments? Dougweller (talk) 21:02, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title 

message: The sentence
"At its height, the territory it occupied spanned the Jordan River, forming two "half-tribes", one on each side; the eastern half-tribe was almost entirely discontinuous with the western half-tribe, only slightly touching at one corner - the south west of the eastern half-tribe and north east of the western half-tribe."
Is inconsistent with the graphic immediately to the sentence's left showing the range of territory.Tennysonm (talk) 22:15, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tribal Territories 

message: Near the end of the 1st paragraph under 'Origin', should it not be Joseph, the father, who ordained that Ephraim should have the firstborn blessing -- not Jacob, the grandfather?
Ah! I found the story of Jacob's blessing of his grandson Ephraim in preference to his elder grandson Manasseh despite the correction attempted by Joseph, the father of the Ephraim & Manasseh.  The paragraph is not in error.
David P West (talk) 16:32, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin 

message: The following content was in the Manasses (given name) article and, since it's really outside the topic of that article, I thought I'd bring it here. It's mostly taken from the Catholic Encyclopedia.
Deriving its name from Manasses, son of Joseph, this tribe was divided into two half-tribes, an eastern and a western.
 
The tribe east of the river Jordan was represented by the descendants of Machir (Judges 5:14). Machir was the first-born of Manasses (Joshua 17:1). The children of Machir took Galaad (Numbers 32:39); Moses gave the land of Galaad to Machir (verse 40). Two other sons of Manasses, Jair and Nobe, also took villages in Galaad, and gave thereto their own names (verses 41-42).
 
The territory of the western half-tribe is roughly sketched in Jos., xvi, 1-3. It was that part of Samaria which lay between the Jordan and the Mediterranean, the plain of Esdrelon and the towns of Jericho, Sichem and Samaria. The eastern half-tribe occupied north Galaad, all Basan and Argob (Joshua 13:30-31; cfr. Deuteronomy 3:13) — an immense tract of land extending east of Jordan to the present Mecca route (darb elhaj) and far beyond, so as to include the Hauran.
— Gorthian (talk) 06:30, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content from Manasses (given name)
Talk:Tribe of Naphtali

message: What is the notability and connection for the coat of arms image (currently labeled with "Portuguese sketch.")? This appears to be a self-created image out of the imagination of some author. It does not seem to have any biblical basis, nor any historical significance, it is in Portuguese rather than any language that could understandably be connected with this WP article, and I am not sure what information this contributes/adds to this article. It would seem reasonable to remove this image. — al-Shimoni (talk) 01:37, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Three weeks have passed and so far no response to the above. I went ahead and removed it. If you disagree, please respond to the above to discuss this before reädding it. Many thanks. — al-Shimoni (talk) 04:34, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coat of Arms Image
Talk:F4 (mathematics)

message: Is this the same as the icositetrachoronic tetracomb with Schläfli symbol {3,4,3,3}? Tom Ruen 17:01, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, the vertices of {3,4,3,3} do not form a lattice. Rather, the vertices of the dual {3,3,4,3} form an F_4 lattice. The situation is analogous to the two-dimensional cases {6,3} and {3,6}. -- Fropuff 16:45, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks! Good to know. Is it worth linking to hexadecachoronic tetracomb {3,3,4,3}? Or equally I wonder - should F4 lattice instead be redirect to this honeycomb? Tom Ruen 18:23, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  F4 lattice? 

message: "There are 3 real forms: a compact one, a split one, and a third one."
Sorry but to me that is a very funny sentence! Moon Oracle (talk) 18:28, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe I was the one who wrote this.  If so, I guess I couldn't find a better way to phrase it: there are three real forms of F4, one of them is remarkable in that it is the compact form, another is remarkable in that it is the split form, and the third form doesn't have such a convenient one-word description.  Feel free to rewrite more eloquently. ;-) (Of course, we should really be writing a full section on real forms and describe them in some detail.) --Gro-Tsen (talk) 21:44, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  And the third one is the second one 

message: I deleted the two sentences from current version of the page (28 October 2014):
"F_4 is the only exceptional lie group which gives the automorphisms of a set of real commutative polynomials. (The other exceptional lie groups require anti-commutative polynomial invariants)."
This is not true: for example, the 3875-dimensional irreducible representation of E8 has an invariant quadratic form and an invariant cubic polynomial, and the subgroup of GL3875 stabilizing these two polynomials is exactly E8.  Exceptg (talk) 18:38, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, I always found this statement suspicious, but I wasn't sure enough to remove it.  I'm glad to know my suspicion was founded.  But is something like what was claimed perhaps true for the lowest-dimensional faithful representation?  Also, does your statement about the 3875-dimensional representation of E₈ follow from an explicit computation, or is it a standard fact, or what?  If you have references about this sort of things, maybe you could add them to the article (and its relatives about the other exceptional Lie groups).  --Gro-Tsen (talk) 11:13, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Well if it is true then it is very new stuff. I found this paper http://arxiv.org/pdf/1309.6611.pdf which is dated 28 April 2015 (two weeks ago!)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.119.106.25 (talk) 17:17, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Invariant polynomials
Talk:Lay's Wow chips

message: Olestra is a fat. It's just that the intestines don't absorb it, which is why it wreaks so much havoc on your gut. It's a shame, because I'm from Bal'mer, and grew up with excellent potato chips from various German manufacturers (Utz, etc). Wow chips are the best-tasting potato chips I've ever eaten. The trick is not to overindulge. The food you're eating (such as a big sub) will buffer the olestra, just as big meal buffers alcoholic beverages. WilliamSommerwerck (talk) 19:08, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
Talk:Jael

message: In line 988 of Milton's Samson Agonistes Delilah compares the betrayal of her husband with Jael's murderous hospitality, both acts committed "to save her country from a fierce destroyer".  Asat (talk) 05:22, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  National relativism 

message: The main Wikipedia page says, "She drove it through his temples with such force that it entered into the ground below," but that is not what the Bible says.  Judges 4:21 says, "Then Jael, Heber's wife, took a tent peg, and took an hammer in her hand, and went softly unto him, and drove the peg into his temples, and fastened it into the ground: for he was fast asleep and weary. So he died."
Although the Bible says that Jael drove the tent peg into his temples and also says she fastened the tent peg to the ground, it does not say that these two actions are one.  In fact, the next chapter (Deborah's Song, Judges 5:27) says clearly that "at her feet he bowed, he fell, he lay down: at her feet he bowed, he fell: where he bowed, there he fell down dead."  You can't fall down dead if you are killed while lying on the ground.
...Warren Gaebel, B.A., B.C.S.
70.31.183.208 (talk) 17:05, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  with such force that it entered into the ground 

message: Surely that would be German spelling, in order to achieve the correct phonetic pronounciation. In English it can only be spelt Yael otherwise the J becomes hard (like Joker or Justin), which isn't the name. The name is Yael (or in phonetical purism Ya'el, because of the Hebrew 'ayin letter which is a guttural consonant). Monosig (talk) 12:45, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Jael is the most common English spelling - as it is with many Hebrew names: Judah, Jesse, Jeremiah. The article should be consistent, though. StAnselm (talk) 15:09, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: See the previous section. Articles titles are almost always decided by WP:COMMONNAME. You realize the previous discussion was several years ago? Johnbod (talk) 15:47, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is the article "Jael" instead of Yael?
Talk:Zebadiah

message: This doesn't seem to be a disambiguation page. The first entry doesn't have any links and the linked articles in the other entries don't mention the name Zebadiah. Possibly merge with List of minor biblical figures, L-Z and redirect this to there? It seems to fit with the other figures listed there, but I'll leave it to more experienced editors to decide what to do. Thanks. 2.25.123.46 (talk) 04:53, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I've been bold and done it. If anyone notices and disagrees, feel free to revert. 2.25.123.46 (talk) 22:45, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Proposal
Talk:Zerah

message: why is he called son of tamar instead of son of judah which is as according to the patriach nature of the bible?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.212.128.180 (talk) 02:16, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  son of judah, not tamar 

message: This page lists five characters in a jumbled order. It would make more sense to present them in sequential order, based on their appearance in the books of the Bible. --Dweller (talk) 13:01, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Order of entries 

message: In editing this page, I removed the terms "Ethiopian king." I accidentally checked the "this is a minor edit" box. I do not consider this a minor edit, but I do stand by the removal. My bad.Alephb (talk) 03:14, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Mea Culpa
Talk:The wesleyan church

message: The formal name of The Wesleyan Church includes the capitalized "The". Therefore, anyone searching by the proper name would be taken to the "create a new page?" article ... which is how I came to create this Redirect article. JimScott 17:06, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Background 

message: An article about The Wesleyan Church already exists. JimScott 17:06, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why the redirect? 

message: I am under the impression, after reading the  Capitalization section of the Wikipedia  Redirection article, that using all lower case characters will allow the search engine to match all manner of capitalization in the Go search box. JimScott 17:06, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is this article name all lower case? 

message: Home page of The Wesleyan Church JimScott 17:06, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Link(s)
Talk:Earl Douglas (radio)

message: Until someone can find some sources for this biography, I suggest it be redirected to Ron and Fez.  A scan of the Google hits isn't helping me right now as most of it relates to Earl of Douglas and a 1940s actor.  Until such time as sources can be found, I think this should serve as a redirect to the Ron and Fez page.  Metros 17:36, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In addition, I feel that he's only going to be the subject of negative commentary and vandalism on Wikipedia as the producer of a radio show.  People in this position are the ones who get ragged on on the air and a lot of that will get back onto this article causing WP:BLP concerns.  There were already some in the article before I blanked it for the redirect.  Metros 17:38, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect
Talk:Darling Thieves

message: Someone keeps erasing the former members section of this page. Please stop, it is valid information, and every notable band has a former members section. Quit undoing it, or said person will be reported. The Edit Corrector (talk) 03:18, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please Stop Erasing Former Members Section 

message: This band is notable by WP:MUSIC since
* two albums have been released,
* one artist formerly was a member of the notable band Zebrahead.
Sorted as part of the Notability wikiproject. --B. Wolterding 17:15, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  notability established 
Talk:Artemision Bronze

message: I wish now that I had titled this article  God of Artemision, as the association with Poseidon is currently replaced by an association with Zeus. Would there be any objection to moving it, to be less decisive about its attribution? --Wetman 17:19, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "Artemision Bronze" is an excellent improvement.--Wetman (talk) 19:21, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[God of Artemision]]?

message: Just thought I'd add there is the possibility that the Scottish sculptor Alexander Carrick's statuettes 'A Boy Putting a Stone' and 'The Gunner' may have been inspired by the Artemision Bronze.
http://www.alexandercarrick.webeden.co.uk/#/thunderbolts/4559079204  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamiemcginlay (talk • contribs) 20:06, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  'In Modern Culture'
Talk:Berenice Panchrysos

message: I am not sure the coordinates/locations are correct.  
In the Italian version of this article (https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berenice_Pancrisia) they say Berenice Panchrysos is "located in the north-eastern desert of Sudan, just below the twenty-second parallel, near the gold mines of Wadi Allaqi in Nubia".
On the other hand - there is a gif-map: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/61/Mapa_Aniba_Baixa_Nubia.gif And there is Wadi Allaqi on this map. And it is located in Egypt (see the article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wadi_Allaqi).
So where the hell is Wadi Allaqi and where is Berenice Panchrysos? 
Titus Atomicus (talk) 02:15, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Location

message: "Berenice Panchrysos was an ancient port city of ancient Egypt, near Sabae in the Regio Troglodytica, on the west coast of the Red  PanchrysosSea, between the 20th and ..."
This sentence can be found in the internet. It is definitely incorrect. 
I wonder if  it was taken from this article in wikipedia...
Titus Atomicus (talk) 12:37, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Berenice, ancient port city... 

message: Very well written article about Berenice Panchrysos is already in Italian wikipedia:
https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berenice_Pancrisia
And a very complex article on this subject:
http://www.sahara.it/cultura/le-tre-citta-di-bernice/
Titus Atomicus (talk) 06:05, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:Thoughts on the Education of Daughters

message: Does anyone know of a free, online version of TED? Awadewit | talk 08:43, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm only three years late, but here you are:  NW (Talk) 03:38, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Excellent - thanks! Awadewit (talk) 04:23, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Online version

message: The article has a bit of unsourced content and cleanup tags. Another concern is comprehensiveness. The article is short and more info could be added from sources like these (t · c) buidhe 04:11, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: , for the first link, this journal does not strike me as reliable for encyclopedic purposes—what do you think? czar 03:23, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: You might be right about that. (t · c) buidhe 03:51, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  FA sweeps 

message: I added attribution, cn and or tags in March, 2021, that have not been addressed.  SandyGeorgia (Talk)  04:20, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:URFA/2020]]
Talk:Fond

message: The information in this article is incorrect.  Ref. The Professional Chef The Culinary Institute of America, 8th ed., 2006, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, p. 160: "If the sauteus is too large, however, the fond (carmelized drppings from the meat) could scorch. (emphasis sic)
--FBelden (talk) 18:18, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Cloth Myth

message: I've given this a much-needed copy edit.  The last paragraph has a problem that I can't resolve, because I'm not familiar with the series -- the numbers don't add up properly.  Accounting4Taste 17:36, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: shouldn't be better to call the article Myth Cloth? Although I have 6 of this action figures and in box reads SAint Cloth Myth, but I think that's wrong189.181.187.156 (talk) 02:09, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  cloth myth or myth cloth?
Talk:Corycus

message: Original introductory sentence was: Corycus was an ancient city in Cilicia Trachaea, Anatolia, located at the mouth of the Calycadnus (now Göksu). I cleared the name Calycadnus (Göksu) and wrote Şeytan deresi instead. Because the river in question is not Calycadnus (Göksu) . (Funny, this is not the first time I came accross this article, I haven't noticed it before) Actually Calycadnus (Göksu) is a river further in the west, close to Silifke  . The distance between the mouths of both rivers is about . (too bad I don't know the ancient name of Şeytan deresi, but I'll look for it) Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 13:07, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not Calycadnus
Talk:Crati

message: Just gave the article a complete overhaul. The photo which was used in the article had a low quality, so I replaced them with the two other two photos present in the Italian Wikipedia article. These could be better though, so I hope anyone can upload a better one for the infobox. AlexanderVanLoon (talk) 19:23, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overhaul of article, better photo needed
Talk:Chocolate syrup

message: I love this stuff. I remember having so much of it when I was five that I got a bellyache. I did not regret that. I loved it then, and I love it now. This article needs to be rescued. MgWd (talk)MgWd  —Preceding undated comment added 01:13, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rescue Chocolate Syrup
Talk:Echinades

message: Well, someone who can reformat the German table is of course welcome, but also it seems odd to have such lengthy treatment of 'where are the Echinades' and 'what did the name Echinades refer to' given that... yknow... we know exactly where they are now. Possible Homeric references seems like it should be a subsection or simply a Echinades (Homeric) article. -LlywelynII (talk) 11:18, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: Somewhat important that it was the setting for the Battle of Lepanto, but Alberto Guglielmotti's History of the Papal Navy seems to suggest it was held and administered by the Papacy rather than the Venetians at least for a while. Other stuff? -LlywelynII (talk) 11:18, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: History
Talk:Earth vs. the Spider (2001 film)

message: I've been working on this article periodically from time to time, however, it still has more information that can be added to it. I can expand it myself  but I need more information if someone is willing to help me with that. I need more information on the film's production (design, development, casting, and filming), and release, as well as information pertaining to the merchandising of the models and action figures of the "Quentin Arachnid". If someone could find said information and provide links to them it would be very much appreciated.--Paleface Jack (talk) 14:50, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion
Talk:Frentani

message: "have constituted one of the four nations of the Samnite confederacy" this is wrong, the samnite confederation had normally 4 members, for a short time the Frentani were the 5th effective member (apparently a fully effective one, meant with full rights) 
Cunibertus (talk) 17:03, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Subtlety/Archive 1

message: I listed the article as needing expansion in an attempt to find more sources. So far, I've only found references in Michael Crichton's Timeline, some medieval enthusiast pages on the internet and the brief passage about it in the source cited in the article.
Peter Isotalo 12:03, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Listed the article as needing expansion

message: Ok, thanks for all the links. All of them clearly don't fit in the article right now, but I'll put them here so they can be sorted through and perhaps used to expand the prose of the article.
Peter Isotalo 06:49, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Added links

message: OED, subtlety, sense 5: 
Cookery. A highly ornamental device, wholly or chiefly made of sugar, sometimes eaten, sometimes used as a table decoration. Obs. exc. Hist.
?c1390 Form of Cury in Warner Antiq. Culin. (1791) 4 It techith for to make curious potages and meetes, and sotiltees. c1440 in Househ. Ord. (1790) 450 A soteltee Seint~jorge on horsebak, and sleynge the dragun. 1467-8 Durham Acc. Rolls (Surtees) 92 Pro le Tynfole empt. pro ornacione et pictura del soteltez erga festum Natal. Domini. 1517 R. TORKINGTON Pilgr. (1884) 7 They mad vs goodly Chere wt Diverse Sotylties as Comfytes and Marche Panys. 1552 LATIMER Serm. Par. King (Parker Soc.) II. 139 At the end of the dinner they have certain subtleties, custards, sweet and delicate things. [1768 H. WALPOLE Let. to Cole 6 June, I am no culinary antiquary: the Bishop of Carlisle, who is, I have often heard talk of a sotelte [printed sotelle], as an ancient dish. 1852 C. M. YONGE Cameos II. xxxi. (1877) 327 The feast was entirely of fish: but they were of many kinds, and were adorned in the quaintest fashions, with sotilties, or subtleties. 1875 J. C. JEAFFRESON Bk. Table I. 133 A subtelty, representing a pelican on a nest with her birds.]
:Bishonen | talk 12:37, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: St. George on horseback and slaying the dragon

message: Just to avoid a misunderstanding: Dominicans are not monks. Technically, they are friars. 70.161.209.90 12:40, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Dominicans/Monks
Talk:Hicetas of Leontini

message: This page should be moved to Hicetas of Leontini. Opinions?--Hyphantes (talk) 17:48, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. --Epìdosis (talk) 18:28, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved.--Hyphantes (talk) 18:55, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed move
Talk:Hirpini

message: An article that lists many Indo-European ethnonyms that mean some sort of animal:
Sergent, Bernard. Ethnozoonymes indo-européens. In: Dialogues d'histoire ancienne, vol. 17, n°2, 1991. pp. 9-55.
DOI : https://doi.org/10.3406/dha.1991.1932
www.persee.fr/doc/dha_0755-7256_1991_num_17_2_1932  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2804:14D:5CE7:8E72:35E8:EAFB:FD0C:DF3E (talk) 19:13, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indo-European Names (Ethnozoonym)