Talk:2. Bundesliga

message: The image :Image:Duisburgzebra.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here.  In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.  Please check
:* That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
:* That this article is linked to from the image description page.
The following images also have this problem:
*:Image:Fcnuernberg.png
*:Image:Fcingolstadt04.png
*:Image:FSV Mainz 05.png
*:Image:FSV Frankfurt.png
*:Image:FC St Pauli.png
*:Image:FC Kaiserslautern.png
*:      Image:FC Hansa Rostock.png
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --06:37, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image copyright problem with Image:Duisburgzebra.png

message: During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
* http://www.dfb.de/bliga/bundes/index.html
** In German football league system on 2011-03-19 23:06:30, 404 Not Found
** In German football league system on 2011-03-22 04:38:00, 404 Not Found
** In 2. Fußball-Bundesliga on 2011-05-25 06:56:13, 404 Not Found
** In 2. Fußball-Bundesliga on 2011-06-10 04:46:23, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 04:46, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 

message: During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
* http://www.bundesliga.de/statistik/liga2/
** In 2. Fußball-Bundesliga on 2011-05-25 06:56:10, 404 Not Found
** In 2. Fußball-Bundesliga on 2011-06-10 04:46:36, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 04:46, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 2 

message: Why UEFA? The Confederation ist the DFL (Deutsche Fußball-Liga).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by SamWinchester000 (talk • contribs) 15:48, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confederation 

message: :Any additional comments:
*Comment - We should await the result of the RM of Fußball-Bundesliga before discussing this one. For consistency, this article should not be moved if Fußball-Bundesliga isn't moved, while it should be moved to 2. Bundesliga if the other article is moved to Bundesliga. Mentoz86 (talk) 11:37, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: After an easy RMnac of the move request, I unilaterally and boldly moved this article to Second Bundesliga (German association football) pending future moves to better possible titles. In the meantime, this title is English and perfectly clear. Red Slash 19:13, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm a bit baffled here, wasn't every vote opposed to the move? And what about the :Category:2. Fußball-Bundesliga and all the associated articles there that still have the 2. Fußball-Bundesliga in the tile? Calistemon (talk) 22:56, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: While the NAC in itself is appropriate, I find it largely inappropriate that you've moved the article to a title that hasn't even been mentioned in the discussion, and I think the move should be reverted. If you have a personal opinion in a discussion, you shouldn't close the discussion, but rather propose your preferred title in the discussion. I've posted a post on WT:FOOTY, to have an uninvolved admin review both the NAC and the page-move. Mentoz86 (talk) 09:03, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

text: One of the most bizarre NAC/page moves I've ever seen, good work undoing it. GiantSnowman 10:34, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved to clearer title

message: Now Fußball-Bundesliga has been moved to Bundesliga (men), we have a totally corrupt bunch of article names.  Perhaps another move request should be posted so we can try to make these names more consistent?   The Rambling Man (talk) 18:13, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Worse still...

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
*Support move to 2. Bundesliga as correct format. GiantSnowman 12:16, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey