Talk:Gatwick Express

message: London-Gatwick is the only journey on the UK National Rail network for which passengers are required to choose between different operators when buying tickets — on all other flows shared by different National Rail operators the tickets are inter-available, although some restrictions may apply (such as "NOT THAMESLINK" or "WAGN ONLY"). Through tickets for which the London-Gatwick line is part of a permitted route are valid on the Gatwick Express, provided they are not endorsed "NOT GATWICK EXPRESS". Tickets from London to stations south of Gatwick generally bear this restriction.
I moved this down the article from the introduction. But its a load of mumbo jumbo really and needs to be edited or deleted. MRSC 20:17, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Ticketing

message: I cannot see the advantage of using the s-bahn logo on the route map.  Surely using just the standard KBF symbol is better than usi8ng a confusing one that will have no meaning whatsoever for the average English language Wikipedean???  There's just no logic to it!  DrFrench 12:21, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OTOH it's standardised and has an appropriate (en) alias in "subway" (an Americanism, but still).  If there is a demonstrable risk of confusion (which has not been supported so far) we can add it to the Wikipedia:Railway line template/Legend page and/or supply an (en) description on the image page. –EdC 22:15, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  We've created a UK specific (ie blue rather than yellow) motorway icon, so IMHO a tube icon should be "doable" but I'm sticking with s-bhan until someone who understands this svg cobblers can do one! Pickle 20:34, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of the S-Bahn logo 

message: :Image:Gatwick express logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:24, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Gatwick express logo.gif

message: Any idea why the last southbound Gatwick Express departure of the day, at 0030, takes 54 minutes? The normal journey time is 30 minutes, and it doesn't make any stops en route. In fact this train is slower than any of the overnight stopping trains operated by Southern, which make four intermediate stops. Mtford 04:13, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slow 0030 service from Victoria 

message: Can someone explain why there's an NPOV template at the top of this page?  There doesn't seem to be any discussion of it on the talk page.  I'm going to remove it if nobody can explain what the debate is. --Jfruh (talk) 06:49, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed it, as no-one seems to have spoken up. --Jfruh (talk) 20:31, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV? 

message: Since this article about the National Express Company that operated the GX franchise. Isn't it better to keep this page as is and include information about GX operations after 22 June in the Southern article. In my understanding this is a simple handover of franchise operations from one company to another.
91.65.36.246 (talk) 10:31, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Handover of franchise to Southern 

message: Does the section "Tickets & fares" need all that information? Per WP:NOTTRAVEL (and also WP:NOTTIMETABLE) I really think that this information is outside the scope of Wikipedia. --Redrose64 (talk) 16:26, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ticketing II 

message: Under "Express service", the article currently states The first unit was taken on a promotional tour of the UK introducing it to travel agents in various centres, thought to be the first time a Southern Region train had travelled north.
I find this hard to understand, and even more difficult to believe. It is so loosely phrased that various interpretations seem valid, and I am not sure if any of them are correct.
# "Southern Region train"
## does this mean a complete train manufactured for the Southern Region? It cannot be that, as the article then states that the coaches came from the Midland Main Line...
## If it means a Southern locomotive, that happened 36 years earlier in the 1948 Locomotive Exchange Trials
## If it means a complete Southern Region train, surely they went off the Southern Region on long-distance specials (football trains, holiday trains etc).
# What is meant by "travelled north"?
## It cannot possibly mean moving towards the north (the most obvious definition) - all Southern trains would have eventually ended up stranded on the coast!
## Other options mean having to define what exactly is meant by "north".
### North of London?
### North of the Southern Region's most northerly line junction with another region?
### The North of England?
Any ideas? I don't want to just delete it - if there is a reliable source which verifies and clarifies the claim, it would definitely be notable. --Peeky44 What's on your mind? 12:36, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious claims 

message: Prior content in this  duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.thameslinkrailway.com/download/10210.2/route-factsheet-5-brighton-main-line-and-coastways and other sources. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:28, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Gatwick Express. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20131102171718/http://www.whitehallpages.net/news/archive/127489 to http://www.whitehallpages.net/news/archive/127489
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20131102171503/http://www.whitehallpages.net/news/archive/26530 to http://www.whitehallpages.net/news/archive/26530
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:28, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Gatwick Express. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150926084655/http://www.railexpress.co.uk/news/gatwick-express-celebrates-30-years to http://www.railexpress.co.uk/news/gatwick-express-celebrates-30-years
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121123140524/http://go-ahead.com/media/news/2009news/2009-06-09.aspx to http://www.go-ahead.com/media/news/2009news/2009-06-09.aspx
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130527143852/http://assets.dft.gov.uk/publications/rail-passenger-franchise-thameslink/thameslink-ojeu-notice.pdf to http://assets.dft.gov.uk/publications/rail-passenger-franchise-thameslink/thameslink-ojeu-notice.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120617070504/http://assets.dft.gov.uk/consultations/dft-2012-23/consultation-thameslink.pdf to http://assets.dft.gov.uk/consultations/dft-2012-23/consultation-thameslink.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121123151534/http://go-ahead.com/media/news/2007news/2007-06-19.aspx to http://www.go-ahead.com/media/news/2007news/2007-06-19.aspx
*Added  tag to http://www.southernrailway.com/main.php?page_id=601
*Added  tag to https://www.gatwickexpress.com/content.asp?pageid=118
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:04, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Gatwick Express. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to https://www.gatwickexpress.com/content.asp?SID=%7B7CB085A3-A079-4085-9C92-B53762D6A0D6%7D&pageid=27
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120307193702/http://www.gatwickexpress.com/en/your-journey/station-improvements/ticket-gates/ to http://www.gatwickexpress.com/en/your-journey/station-improvements/ticket-gates/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:50, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I just put a train hired from GN -- RiceKrispiesfan123 (talk) 16:41, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A new edit