Template talk:Sup

message: This template is used in a number of articles - [. The addition of a bullet makes those pages look weird. -Willmcw 00:34, Mar 20, 2005 (UTC)
::No. The template was creatd by me just a few hours ago. I removed the bullet and added parentheses. --Zappaz 00:36, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This template was on TFD, but there was no consensus to delete it. So it is kept. See Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/Not deleted/June 2005. It was suggested by some voters that this template be subst'ed as much as possible, to avoid server drain. Radiant_>|< 11:49, Jun 9, 2005 (UTC)
:subst'ed? 
:— <TALKJNDRLINETALK>      19:31, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: As in transcluding the template using the "subst" keyword, e.g. . --David Iberri (talk) 21:23, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: See Wikipedia:Template substitution. --Kenyon 00:22, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved from [[Template talk:Sub]] 

message: I will create related templates for other fuctions like this one, like a  template, font templates, etc. I will create a category for them. Polonium 01:18, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other templates 

message: I have reverted this template to a previous version as it appears to be broken.  It no longer uses :template:su.  SpinningSpark 08:03, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: And I've protected it per WP:HRT. Stifle (talk) 09:21, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template broken 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: No consensus. Let me succinctly list the rationales for closing this as moved or not moved:
*For: slight numerical advantage in !votes, "superscript/subscript" is clearer;
*Against: "sup/sub" is already clear enough (c.f. HTML), 60,000 transclusions is a lot.
The transclusion count is what, to me, signifies that we need a clear consensus to move, because while redirects are cheap, "cheap" does not mean "free". With my template editor hat on, high-use templates should be touched very sparingly, and I don't think the balance is pushed down far enough to justify moving.  Sceptre (talk) 06:12, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Template:Sup →  – Trying to call  should work, and it makes sense to host the template at the more complete title. I could move it myself, but requesting here out of caution since it has 60k transclusions and I wouldn't want to mess anything up.  talk 07:14, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

text: This is a contested technical request (permalink). GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 14:16, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 16 August 2020 

message: Hi, can a 'Link' parameter be added to this template? It would be very helpful. Thank you. Empire AS  (Talk)  06:24, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Couldn't you just create links via the normal square brackets within the template?  talk 07:18, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  the method worked. Thank you. Empire AS  (Talk)  07:41, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: , Could you help in this? Thank you. Empire AS  (Talk)  07:43, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parameter request