lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Pop rap

message: I am sick of the speedy deletion out being used.... However recommended it for speedy deletion just gave a blanket statement with no substantiating evidence. Please provided the copyrighted material where it was pulled from so that I can research it and then maybe I will go along with the speedy deletion... otherwise I will assume that the article was just written too well and that is why it was flagged as copyrighted material and I will vote against speedy deletion and recommend that it just be wikified. xerocs 19:56, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: nevermind, I agree with the speedy deletion. It is copyvio material http://www.mp3.com/Pop-Rap/genre/577/subgenre.html Sorry. Thanks. xerocs 19:59, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Great, edit conflict XD Circeus 20:03, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  If that was for me thanks... but what is XD?? xerocs 21:15, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Smiley. Circeus 21:22, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Oh, is that like a frustrated smiley... or a constipated one? xerocs 21:44, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I call it "the other :-)". My frustrated smiley is ">.<" (anime smiley). Circeus 22:58, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy deletion

message: The target page of this redirect should be hip pop, rather than hip hop. The hip pop article says "...is commonly called pop rap in the US". Adabow (talk · contribs) 03:00, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: That assertion is actually unsourced, and when we had a separate pop rap article it was deleted for precisely that reason. I'd rather simply remove the non-Japan stuff from hip pop. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward: not at work) - talk 11:53, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Change target to [[hip pop]]

message: Shouldn't this be deleted by now? Typing in pop rap redirects to hip hop music anyway, so I don't see the purpose in this, if nobody is going to read it anyway. --R3troguy420 (talk) 13:18, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Most of it seems to be random, arbitrarily included, or just plain not true. Certainly needs a clean up.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nikki Lee 1999 (talk • contribs) 01:08, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

text: Why is this article not deleted yet? --Nedks1 (talk) 17:31, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is this article still around? 

message: Is it just because everyone has slept on real legit innovative hip hop for so long that you essentially do not believe it deserves to exist?  What exactly would you call Young Thug, Future, and the millions of offshoots of rappers from 2013-2020 and beyond that breach far beyond "Pop Rap" (YoungBoyNBA for example) that are making Melodic Rap?  Why doesn't it have its own genre page, or at least an entire section in this page? 
You say "also known as melodic rap" when you don't even reference the actual music from the 2010s that led to that terminology (in the modern sense.) 2601:988:180:1010:A914:D345:7309:FD11 (talk) 22:19, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why does melodic rap not have its own Wiki page and why does the history of Pop Rap on this page completely disregard 2013-2020+'s wave of Melodic Rap?
Talk:Phnom Bakheng

message: I just added a little information about Cosmology and Astronomy this included some information that contradicted information already on the page. The differences are about the number of towers. My souce says 109 total 1 center 4 other main towers and 104 smaller towers. I don't have access to the source that provided the other version so unless someone else checks it I may change the discrepencies based on the information available to me. I suspect 4 may have been counted twice. There is also a minor disrepency about the number of tiers. good day Zacherystaylor (talk) 16:35, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor discrepancies
Talk:Langkasuka

message: I removed the stub status, as the article is now quite detailed, if not as organized as it should be. --Bejnar 18:15, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub or Start

message: If it part of Malaysia, I can understand it. If it part of Thailand, I still can understand it. But if it part of India? South Asia is different with South East Asian. Even if we were heavily influenced by Hinduism, South East Asia were totally different. You wouldn't include China as Wiki India Project eventhough Buddha were from India, rite? Kunderemp 04:13, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Why it has to be part of Wiki India Project?

message: Langkasuka was a Malay Kingdom from Malaysia, situated somewhere between the now what lies the state of Kelantan and Terengganu. How can this article be a WikiThailand Project if this article is obviously related to Malaysia? EnvyDC (talk) 07:14, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Kelantan and Terengganu were part of Thailand. Pakbelang (talk) 06:52, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Not a WikiThailand nor a WikiBuddhism project

message: Just glancing this over, the changes do not appear well supported by the source, happy to hear everyone's thoughts. 74.73.224.126 (talk) 18:38, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, the map just comes from a video from youtube. Not from this source. If it were, the book must border-to-border show a similar map similar to the one here Danial Bass (talk) 18:46, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mapping 

message: I got this from Fandom. 2402:B400:4640:2882:C0BF:B4FF:FE0B:B398 (talk) 15:19, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: That's not a reliable source, see Wikipedia guidelines WP:RS Danial Bass (talk) 16:57, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Okay Danial Bass, Langkasuka is existed in 2 AD and collapsed in 1411
Talk:Carcinoid syndrome

message: I think that you should change the survival times--I was told that by a doctor at the Mayo Clinic in 2000 that the median survival from diagnosis was 7 years.  If you check the online support groups you will hear of people surviving more than 20 years after diagnosis of liver metastases and onset of symptoms.       --216.137.70.192 08:54, 7 January 2006.       Moved from main article --82.16.57.133 19:59, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: I

message: There are non-invasive imaging modalities for finding Carcinoid, including: Iodinated (I-123 or I-131) metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG), or Indium pentatreotide (>80% sensitivity).  66.57.77.120 02:27, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  detection 

message: Has this occurred to anyone:
-there is excessive vasodilation that occurs in carcinoid syndrome
-there are new forms of migraine medicine called "triptans" that include medicine such as imitrex that have vasoconstrictive actions.
-maybe that subject should be researched more and it seems that if you treat the person with vasoconstrictors it would improve some of the symptoms that carcinoid syndrome patients have that include frequent headaches.
I doubt they would be a good treatment, for one they target specifically serotonin receptors in the brain and are agonists.  I do not think you want to have a 5ht agonist working in a high serotonin environment, not to mention you might risk serotonin syndrome. The better option, which is also FDA approved for carcinoid syndrome is octreotide.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.220.15.68 (talk) 20:25, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Carcinoid and Migraines 

message: :Niacin could possibly reverse carcinoid cancer.
Unsourced and dubious statement. Kpjas (talk) 07:44, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal 

message: Hello all, I am a m4 student editing this article as part of a WikiProject Medicine class. Below are my goals for edits over the next few weeks:
# Review and update sources
# provide more background information in the pathophysiology section
# provide a more full and precise signs and symptoms section
# Discuss more in the treatment section and try to provide links to other relevant wikipedia articles
# Potentially other clarifications and summary edits as necessary
This is my first time editing wikipedia articles so I look forward to any and all guidance and suggestions! JackNagam (talk) 19:02, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hello
Talk:Mỹ Sơn

message: I think this page is rather poorly documented. Notably the history which is very limited. Some good reference can be found on Google (they may need double checking but are good starting points! Here's a few of them:
The kingdom of Champa, AncienWorlds.netChampa's Childer - contains a good history of the Champa Kingdom84.103.32.42 (talk) 21:49, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improving the history section (content). 

message: The US nearly levelled the site and all it gets are two perfunctory sentences in the article? It doesn't even mention that the Viet Cong used the site as a base since they knew the US wouldn't bomb it due to its historical significance, and that it took an Act of Congress to get them to do so. OldManInACoffeeCan (Mukkakukaku's alt for public terminals) 22:13, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Also doesn't mention that said bombing was a war crime per the Hague Convention of 1907. — Red XIV (talk) 06:26, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Not a war crime if its being used by military forces, which My Son was. Mztourist (talk) 06:39, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vietnam War 
Talk:St. Benedict's Preparatory School

message: St. Benedict's sports teams are ridiculously good, especially soccer and basketball so i think its fair to say they have "prestigous teams" anyone else have an opinion on this? Wangster 03:32, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Two problems with that... 1) You need to cite a source to support the statement. 2) Its editorializing.  You may want to list athletic accomplishements that have occured, and leave it to the reader to decide whether its "prestigous" Roodog2k 18:46, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Please try to remember that the article is not about sports figures and their later accomplishments, but about the school. Readers can link to the article on the sports figure if they are all that interested. Student7 (talk) 01:56, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

text: Maroon and Garnet are the same color. "Maroon and Gray" and "Garnet and Gray" are used interchangeably.--Augustineosb (talk) 14:24, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Sports

message: While the "notables" are probably one of the best-cited of any school I watch, someone inserted birth years, which was quite irrelevant. We care about when the school and the "notable" intersected, not what year the person was born. Birthyear is irrelevant (non-WP:TOPIC) for the school. Graduation year is definitely relevant. Student7 (talk) 20:36, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Graduation year is relevant

message: Was so impressed I had to let someone know how impressed I was with what you're doing. Keep on keeping on. Lynnesaunders61 (talk) 03:20, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Saw 60 Minutes Show
Talk:Cris Carter

message: I disagree with the wording in the article calling a 12-point win by the Rams a "route" [sic]. A rout is when a team wins in a decisive and dominating fashion. A win by 17 points or more is a rout, as is any game in which a team manages no points. But 12-point wins are common, and the wording should be changed. The Super Bowl Rams put up a beautiful second half, but they didn't manage anything resembling a rout. If I recall the game correctly, the Vikings held in close until about halfway into the fourth quarter. 66.80.212.78 20:00, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *Thank you for your input. I agree with you and I have changed the wording. In the future, feel free to edit the page. Contributions such as these are what make Wikipedia. Kushboy 21:58, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

text: The word is "rout." Can't you read? 64.111.148.195 (talk) 22:20, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Route" 

message: I'd like to point out that Cris had 2 correct game pics out of all 11 total chances for Yahoo! Sports. This was partially because he picked against the Steelers every time (who ended up winning the Super Bowl). The "biased" comments  that some user just posted reminded me of this. --Cngodles 16:20, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2005 NFL Playoffs Predictions 

message: I attempted to shorten this section by removing information not pertaining directly to Cris Carter, but it should be shortened much more eventually.  - Maximusveritas (talk) 19:40, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need to shorten "Minnesota Vikings 1990-2001" section 

message: This information doesn't strike me as relevent as per WP:BLP and WP:UNDO and I propose that it be removed.  SeanNovack (talk) 19:12, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section about his son 
Talk:Ljig

message: I deleted this, "The community has 279 m2". That's about 3,000 sq. ft or the size of a house.
Avalon 20:00, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Area

message: You now have twice references 1 and 2. If you work the two last references (from the references section) into the article with ref tags, you'll have a normal 1-4. Debresser (talk) 19:19, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 
Talk:Alabama School of Mathematics and Science

message: Please note that the inaugural class entered in 1991 and graduated in 1993.  You can note this on the website in many places on the ASMS website: the list of alumni association representatives, a guide for prospective students, etc. --Will Hester (talk) 20:02, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

message: Its mildly amusing to see a detailed information on geekfest's history, especially since I was on the first staff, but I think the history needs to stripped out because theres not a real way to cite any of that information.    —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.220.236.251 (talk) 04:25, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Geek Fest and other stuff

message: I did an edit and put in the bare minimum references the page probably needs. I also included Azimuth under publications, the year book as a publication. I don't know if they have officially given  the publication up but classes during 04 and 05, actually recieved ones during those years. I think there may need to be a fairly drastic content rewrite to really get the article to b class or A class level. 
what, is someone trying to JURY-RIG ASMS SGA elections or something? :P i right what i write so don't be so uptight 02:10, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations
Talk:Bayon

message: The current text makes no grammatical sense, especially the last sentence beginning "Angkor scholar":
The similarity of the 216 gigantic faces on the temple's towers to other statues of the king has led many scholars to the conclusion that the faces are representations of Brahma (). Others have said that the faces belong to the bodhisattva of compassion called Avalokitesvara or Lokesvara.Coedės, p.137.  The two hypotheses need not be regarded as mutually exclusive. Angkor scholar George Coedès has theorized that Jayavarman stood squarely in the tradition of the Khmer monarchs in thinking of himself as a "devaraja" (god-king), the salient difference being that while his predecessors were Hindus and regarded themselves as consubstantial with Shiva and his symbol the lingam, Jayavarman as a Hindu.Coedès, p.147.
This is what was there before it was altered to make no grammatical sense:
The similarity of the 216 gigantic faces on the temple's towers to other statues of the king has led many scholars to the conclusion that the faces are representations of Jayavarman VII himself. Others have said that the faces belong to the bodhisattva of compassion called Avalokitesvara or Lokesvara.Coedės, p.137.  The two hypotheses need not be regarded as mutually exclusive. Angkor scholar George Coedès has theorized that Jayavarman stood squarely in the tradition of the Khmer monarchs in thinking of himself as a "devaraja" (god-king), the salient difference being that while his predecessors were Hindus and regarded themselves as consubstantial with Shiva and his symbol the lingam, Jayavarman as a Buddhist identified himself with the Buddha and the bodhisattva.Coedès, p.147.
147.147.128.67 (talk) 22:01, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Buddhist symbolism in the foundation of the temple by King Jayavarman VII 

message: Why does the "Etymology of Bayon" section not actually explain the etymology of the word "Bayon"? 173.88.246.138 (talk) 03:38, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Etymology
Talk:Mikey and Nicky

message: "This led John Simon to call the film "a celluloid death wish" in a 1976 New Yorker article."
The attached citation is for an article in New York, not The New Yorker. I'm allowing for the possibility that the New York article is Simon following up on (and mentioning) the article mentioned here in the text. Of course I may very well be wrong to do so, and maybe the text or the cite is in error. Does anyone know for certain? Harfarhs (talk) 08:00, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  John Simon's article(s)
Talk:Point Blank (1967 film)

message: From my memory, there seem to be a number of flaws in the description of the plot.
1) "Walker...shot by his adulterous wife"
I didn't think it was certain that they were actually married.
2) I thought it wasn't his wife that shot him, it was Reese.
3) "Walker pursues his money in a series of murders..."
Few, if any, of the deaths, are directly caused by Walker.
Reese is killed by accident, and three guys are killed by the sniper arranged by the Organisation.
Walker may have some indirect responsibility for their deaths, but he doesn't actually kill any of them.
Does anyone agree / disagree with this ? If there are no objections, I will change the article accordingly. GeraldH 08:35, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, poor Walker actually is a ghost.  One of the unique contributions of this film is that Boorman gives us a ghost's experience: less consistent or understandable than life is for the living.  Less real.  Very cool.  Funny how the critics can miss this!Vendrov 10:44, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Shouldn't the idea that the Walker character - ghost or otherwise - is not what he seems to be be included in the article somewhere? I read this article and was disappointed that it wasn't. A large part of the allure of this film is that it is not what it appears to be at face value, if the Walker character is killed at the start (as is shown).   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.207.246.4 (talk) 13:18, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questions 
Talk:The Seventh Victim

message: Can someone edit the info about the remake? It's now way past 2009.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.201.144.231 (talk) 23:29, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: So the image in the infobox is not the poster, but apparently the lobby card. Per infobox standards, we are supposed to have a poster predominantly. should we change that? or at least change the subtitle? Andrzejbanas (talk) 01:28, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Poster image is not a poster

message: I have looked over this article and it mostly complies with the criteria for B-class status. However there are a couple of issues that need to be addressed:
#Some of the web sources look dubious to me. I have tagged these appropriately.
#The lead also needs to be fleshed out. The lead is supposed to briefly summarize the article and the three senetnces covering the production, release and analysis doesn't cut it. Think of the lead as the article for the Twitter generation i..e for people who are too busy to read the entire article.
Also, in regards to the citations while I understand using the short footnote system for books—especially when multiple pages need to be referenced—it really makes no sense to use this system for web sources i.e. there is no value in making readers click twice to get to the reference. Personally I would just incorporate the web sources into the notes, but that is just a personal preference not a demand. Overall it's a nice little article; as a fan of Val Lewton films I found the article informative and interesting to read. The level of sourcing is generally high and the quality of the writing is good. I can't foresee any major obstacles at the GA review. Betty Logan (talk) 03:27, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer review
Talk:The Shooting

message: This article is poorly written/developed and needs to be rewritten entirely in order to meet Wikipiedia's guidelines and standards. The Production section is written in a style and tone that doesn't meet Wikipiedia's guidelines of an encyclopedic style/tone. This should be rewritten so that it meets these standards and expended when needed. The Reception section is also poorly written and contains information that is unsourced. The section should be rewritten and all unsourced information either given proper citations from reliable sources or removed from the article if non can be found. The article is also missing important information on the film's releases which needs to be added to the article with proper citations from reliable sources. This article has potential to become GA or FA if enough attention is given to it. Hopefully someone comes along and gives it the attention it needs.--Paleface Jack 17:08, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation, Rewrite, and Expansion
Talk:Track of the Cat

message: The article quotes extensively from a 2005 review by Dennis Schwartz of Ozus' World Movie Reviews. However, I wonder if that should be considered a WP:reliable source or simply a personal blog. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 20:53, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source reliability
Talk:The Wrong Man

message: The original poster image has been replaced, claiming it's the DVD cover. It's not. Here is an image of the DVD cover. Note the "DVD" in the lower left hand corner. here is the poster. Note the lack of a "DVD" in the lower left corner. Obviously this poster was used for the DVD cover design. That said, if "consensus" prefers a different poster just so it will look different from the DVD cover (and prevent continuous claims that it is a DVD cover), fine. Just don't do it because it's a DVD cover. It's not. Of course, if this were a rational project, the possibility of showing two different posters for one film would not be out of the question. But then this is not. Dekkappai (talk) 14:23, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Replacing the poster

message: Hello, could someone help me to find out the « novel The True Story of Christopher Emmanuel Balestrero mentionned here ? Nothing on Library of Congress.... Thks a lot, -- Spiessens 10:58, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question about a "novel"...

message: The article might additionally mention the fact that "The Wrong Man" resembles John Brahm's 1939 film noir "Let Us Live" in more than one way. Especially, the earlier movie also starred Henry Fonda playing an ordinary citizen wrongfully convicted for a crime he had not committed due to false identification by witnesses. Brahm's film, too, was based on a true story, although another one. 92.79.101.164 (talk) 12:27, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resemblance to John Brahm's "Let Us Live" (1939)
Talk:Preah Khan

message: this name sounds like Islamic.  how is this named that way when it appears more of hindu or bhuddism historical background   — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chitrada (talk • contribs) 01:17, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

message: If the main part of the temple is Buddhist and the temple was built for Buddhist Bodhisattva Avalokiteshvara, Why is religious affiliation of this temple Hinduism? Isn't it should be Buddhism? Sri lankan sinhala (talk) 14:51, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Buddhist temple