lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:HobbyTown USA

message: HobbyTown has an updated logo. What is the proper way attribute a license to this? The new logo can be seen on the HobbyTown homepage: www.hobbytown.com
As social media manager for HobbyTown home office, I have access to the source files and can upload an SVG, JPEG, or PNG. Any assistance would be greatly appreciated!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nickster123 (talk • contribs) 17:53, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updated Logo 

message: I just added a lot of material, and although my understanding is that I could upgrade the article's classification myself, I'd rather have someone else do that independently. I think I've upgraded it from "Stub" to "Start"; with improvements of sources it might even qualify as a "C", though I'm a bit fuzzy about the classifications.
Sources: I knew all the material I added from being a customer of each of the stores mentioned, but that's the worst form of original research. I was unable to find independent documentation of two sentences about Great Race, but I suspect that documentation exists somewhere; it might require something like searching microfilm of a Lincoln newspaper. A state business license search came up empty, and would count as a primary source anyway. The city only licenses certain kinds of businesses, and that doesn't include hobby stores. An interesting but irrelevant bit of primary source data I found was that the Small Business Adminstration's 1978 annual report said that Great Race received a $13000 SBA loan.
I searched for information about Great Race founder Ron Justvig, and came up with lots of paywalled newspaper scans. Possibly useful articles are in the Lincoln Star (31 August 1975, page 53; 13 January 1977, page 13). Other mentions of Ron Justvig are wedding announcements and ads for lending. Besides the paywalled site, History Nebraska (formerly the Nebraska State Historical Society) has a microfilm archive.
The official corporate web site ignores everything about the company's history before 1985, so besides not being an independent source it's not very helpful. — Steve98052 (talk) 02:39, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article class assessment
Talk:Hobart Corporation

message: Can someone clarify if this company is or is not related to another company, also called Hobart, that manufactures welders and welding equipment?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.211.212.206 (talk) 18:39, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hobart company details 

message: I want you to get ahold of the company and see what's going on 107.77.234.63 (talk) 00:59, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Qianjia company  co ltd sold me a MIG welder NFL 40 plasma cutter new well I haven't received them and they won't answer my email I figured I'd would touch base with you and see if you know what was going on I paid through PayPal on them to their paid for do this not answer my email and they give me some tracking numbers but there's a wrong tracking numbers I would appreciate if you could get back to me here's my number423 539 0632 they was bought on December 30th they said they was going out of business or something I don't know what he was doing 

message: "The former KitchenAid division was formed in 1919." Read this entire paragraph, and if you don't know how Hobart and KitchenAid are, or were, related, you still won't be sure after reading the paragraph. It needs simplification and clarification. I've read it several times and I'm still not sure what the timespan was that the two companies (or divisions) were related, and how. 68.58.23.188 (talk) 17:16, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  History is confusing
Talk:HKS (company)

message: HKS Co., Ltd. → HKS (company) — Requesting move to make typing less ambiguous to other users —Willirennen 10:32, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This article has been moved as the result of an uncontroversial move request. Dekimasuよ! 14:37, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 
Category talk:Iron and steel mills

message: I would suggest that this category be renamed as Iron and Steel Works.  This is a more comprehensive description than the present one, as it includes foundries.  Furthermore, it is doubtful whether some ironworks should in fact be described as mills.  I do not know how to make this change; I suspect that it is something that only an admin can do.  Peterkingiron 23:04, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Now nominated as WP:CFD accordingly.  Peterkingiron 19:01, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggested rename
Talk:Hisense

message: This article was entirely taken from the company's website before I got to it. It didn't even have a different formatting. I've tried to clean it up by deleting alot of things and formatting, but there's still alot of junk in there and it sounds like an advertisement for the company. If you can help, please do!64.94.47.13 17:13, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm trying to find out how I can get a hold of the manufacturer my TV quit working 174.242.207.155 (talk) 14:56, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  TV
Talk:Hippocrene Books

message: http://books.google.com/books?id=BHINUGtAjugC&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=L8La-FDRrmQC&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=f1Cn3QqKolcC&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=3GwnB0Y2shQC&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=LpolWUbzt70C&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=A5yN7EgW2vUC&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=nsY4u9qg2oEC&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=Pn-oNobMtkIC&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=44OEetV4TUIC&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=vpNOCLJImNkC&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=ulV_rpsOs6sC&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=rBuLuB68KnoC&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=1kYQo8cewUQC&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=zn8nk-IAuecC&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=_IlTOrTlrL0C&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=Z6Ovx7-FSwEC&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
Rajmaan (talk) 17:27, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of books published by hippocrene
Talk:Antonella Barba

message: For one, having sections called "Controversy" in BLPs is deprecated. "Controversy" is a word with inherent negative connotations, and is wholly undescriptive besides. Moreover, there is no evidence presented in any sources that there is any significant public interest or debate about what happened to her vs. some other contestant in a random reality show, nor is there any evidence presented that anyone thinks it's "controversial" that she wasn't dismissed while someone else was. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 17:25, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Controversy" section violates [[WP:BLP]] 

message: >>"The trial has yet to be scheduled, through the judge waived a speedy trial due to the case's "complexity".
I'm not a lawyer, but can someone who knows the system rephrase this sentence or tell us if it doesn't need to be rephrased?  In my mind, either Antonella Barba voluntarily waived her right to a speedy trial; or the judge recommended it and she conceded. But as far as I know, the government cannot waive your rights.  Thoughts?--Mrcolj (talk) 17:14, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: * The second option seems to be the most likely to me. I was going by what the source/citation said. I could remove that part completely if necessary though. Aoba47 (talk) 20:10, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The Judge waived a speedy trial" 

message: Based on her history of frequent arrests and mental illness, it does appear that her career is over. It might be fascinating for her fans to keep amending the article with her most recent drug arrests but that means this page is dedicated to a known mentally ill drug dealer who would not be notable except that she was one of millions of people on American Idol. 2604:2D80:A48F:300:E196:5751:B3A5:F8AD (talk) 20:45, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nominate for deletion
Talk:Hilleberg

message: ==Untitled==
I deleted the comment that the Keron was the first modern tunnel tent. The first tunnel tent based on the principles we see today was produced by Helsport, in 1971 - before Hilleberg was founded.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.177.155.226 (talk) 15:14, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not the first "modern" tunnel tent" 

message: I deleted the comment that the Keron was the first modern tunnel tent. The first tunnel tent based on the principles we see today was produced by Helsport, in 1971 - before Hilleberg was founded.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.177.155.226 (talk) 15:14, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:HighWire

message: :Copied from User talk:Nurg
Hi, your last edit on HighWire Press removed a claim on the grounds that it failed verification, but the claim was already given in the page that was cited: https://www.highwirepress.com/about-us says "over 3000 journals, books, reference works, and proceedings." They used to have a great big list of journals and books, but I don't see it anymore. Is that why you believe the claim fails verification? ~Anachronist (talk) 23:57, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi. The claim was "HighWire Press hosts the largest repository of peer-reviewed content, with over 3500 journals from scholarly publishers". If they now say their platform "supports over 3000 journals, books, reference works, and proceedings", it sounds like it no longer hosts over 3500 journals (excluding other works). Some publishers have left HighWire in recent times, so I believe the number is dropping. Also, the claim to be the largest repository of peer-reviewed content needs a reference, preferably an independent one. By the way, the page cited was https://highwirepress.com, not https://www.highwirepress.com/about-us. I certainly have no objection to reliably sourced, up-to-date info about their scope being added, but as more publishers leave, it is a changing figure. Nurg (talk) 00:20, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the explanation. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:08, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Failed verification
Talk:OMEGA Championship Wrestling

message: On this page it states that OMEGA folded in 1999, however on jeff's page it says he took part at an omega event in 2006, it's under the section of independant circuit, doesn't really bother me i'm just curious as to wether it's still running.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.100.221.196 (talk) 12:36, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Folded 

message: The hardy boyz were the creaters of O.M.E.G.A(Organization of Modern Extreme Grappling Arts)and since then they have carried there style from there to the WWE organization so I think omega has not been forgotten.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.205.106.192 (talk) 21:34, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow, thanks for the information. I don't think a single person knew that. You must be one of those smart people the talkin box says is real.--DanteAgusta (talk) 21:50, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  the hardy boyz 

message: Matt possibly retired due to injuries? Interesting. It's possible that Matt moved to Alaska to sale Snowmen. Should I put my speculation in this article as well? No I shouldn't. Wikipedia isn't an encyclopedic of possibilities but facts. I'm removing the speculation from the article. If it is fact Then Rewrite it affirmatively and provide a source. Further more Matt being released from TNA and/or him retiring has no bearing on him or Jeff restarting Omega. Retiring from competition doesn't imply retiring from booking.24.115.19.178 (talk) 16:42, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  really?
Talk:HID Global

message: The following was pasted into the page. It could be good info, but needs cleanup and citation.
HID uses their own iClass encryption, none open source based, that was cracked back to 2010.
The company uses a raimbow table allowing them to find back any iClass readers encryption keys but still pretending to manufacture secured iClass readers with unique encryption key for each client.
2005 the HID proximity 125kHz readers and fobs were official cracked and tutorials came out on the internet.
HID still produce, sell and promote their HID proximity readers without letting the public know know about the insecurity of the system, million people buy and install the proximity readers every years.
Me
eriac, Milosch (29 December 20, reversed engineering the HID iClass readers and publish on his website the methods and details. HID still procude today such unsecured readers, using heavy marketing HID still the leader on the security market.0).
nstall the proximity 125kHz every year.
ly
Security through obscurity in opposition with the Kerckhoffs' doctrine.
--209.34.31.15 (talk) 15:35, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hacked info
Talk:Hexion

message: I ran across this page and found it is out-of-date - Hexion Specialty Chemicals is now Momentive Specialty Chemicals, the result of an October 2010 M&A (it looks like Momentive Performance Materials Holdings LLC acquired Hexion, according to this site). My Wiki-fu is weak - my experience in page editing is limited to very simple and perfunctory corrections, and those were done a long time ago - so I'm leaving this note on the Discussion page for now, to make folks aware of the new information.  I'll try to come back and do a right-and-proper editing job, unless one of you Wiki pros gets to it first.
Sharl928 (talk) 21:01, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The company is now owned by Westlake. I have updated and used some secondary sources rather than primary to reference. I also updated the history. GRALISTAIR (talk) 14:00, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Issues
Talk:Hershey Trust Company

message: While this article is barely a stub at the moment, it can be improved substantially to meet the general notability guidelines. There are a number of independent sources which meet the proper depth of coverage to meet the guidelines. I will work to improve the article sufficiently, beyond the edit I just made. Thank you for bringing this to my attention as the article certainly needs it. 
I also wanted to add that the message in your proposed deletion template is in conflict with the template itself. The prod proposal is allowed to be removed without comment. As it is stated in the template: "You may remove this message if you improve the article or otherwise object to deletion for any reason. Although not required, you are encouraged to explain why you object to the deletion, either in your edit summary or on the talk page." --hmich176 10:02, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed deletion
Talk:Herr's Snacks

message: I know it already has the advertisement tag, but seriously. Feels like I'm on their homepage with this article. Community involvement? Commercial spots? Yeesh.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.103.230.227 (talk) 23:28, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Anyone have any references to who this person is/was and their relation to Herr's Snacks, if any? Edits were previously done by 172.58.142.167 to change references to Ed Herr to be references to Tristan Heidelburg with no explaination aside from a revision comment stating the editor "Told the truth". No references to Tristan Heidelburg could be found anywhere in my searching and there are no references to such a person on the Herr's Snack foods company website. - Legoboy920 (talk) 18:00, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tristan Heidelburg
Talk:Jonny Foster

message: I have placed merger tags on a number of character articles. Rather than repeat the reasoning on each talk page I have set out the full argument here. Please feel free to leave comments either on this talk page or at the WikiProject. I want to try and start a debate about the whole way in which Emmerdale information is provided on Wikipedia--Amxitsa 21:38, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed Merger

message: * - Richard's concerns over role
* - Mathew Bose on Johnny
* - Casting
* - Return
* - Gay wedding.Rain the 1 18:57, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Herbert Smith

message: This page reads like promotional material.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.146.134.175 (talk) 20:33, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reads like promotional material

message: This article reads like promotional material, particularly following recent edits. It needs to be changed to be more neutral. BunnyDust (talk) 00:27, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have now produced what I feel is a neutral draft. My idea is to use this as a basis, take comments on it to produce a final draft, and then move it onto the Herbert Smith page to replace both current profiles. Please see User:BunnyDust/Herbert_Smith and leave comments there. BunnyDust (talk) 10:15, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

text: I've now updated the page after we created a new, neutral profile on User:BunnyDust/Herbert_Smith (which I'm keeping for reference). I've also added a warning box at the top of the article referring to Wikipedia's editing policies which I think should be there for at least two weeks.BunnyDust (talk) 09:46, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tone of article
Talk:Herbal Essences

message: This article has been so heavily vandalized that I'm not even sure what to leave in it. It needs to be rewritten. --N-k (talk) 03:23, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: It would be nice if the article could explain how Herbal Essences is by Clairol, but yet owned by P&G. I don't think P&G owns Clairol, do they? Clairol is owned by Coty, Inc.. Thanks! 73.101.167.59 (talk) 15:19, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clairol vs. P&G 

message: The problem with the complete rebranding and restructuring of the original Herbal Essence shampoo is that it was a disaster. The early version was a delight to use, had a ravishing scent like no other, and left you with hair that shone and bounced. Not one of the faux Herbal Essence shampoos of 2024 even come close. P&G mangled the essential list of ingredients beyond recognition, hoping to be seen as truly "clean and natural." Did they think that fans of the original shampoo wouldn't notice that it now smelled bad? The article should, at the very least, give information about facsimile shampoos that resemble the original. Or even factories in foreign places that, legally or not, make it. And P&G should take the bold step of producing a small test run of the early, authentic Herbal Essence. They might be surprised at the reception.
Younggoldchip (talk) 14:23, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the Original Herbal Essences Shampoo Being Made ANYWHERE?
Talk:HEPCO

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have made some new changes to this article. The language was problematic, so I made some general copyediting. There were a few citations missing, and I've added those. Some dead links we're there and I've tried to replace them with similar sources.
The company's history is a bit messy, I tried to be accurate, but if there's any discrepancy I'm happy to amend/rollback these sections. Please do share if you have any concerns regarding my edits. Wade1995 (talk) 07:35, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  General Edits
Talk:Henry Schein

message: Henry Schein, Inc. is a client of ours. It has been brought to my attention that their current article is out of date, contains non cited information, and is not in line with other articles in their industry. I propose the following re-structure. If no action is taken within a week, I will make the edits myself. If there are any suggestions/edits/concerns, please discuss in my Talk Section. //Brycetom (talk) 17:34, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

message: A. Lavin Communications appears to be making edits on behalf of the subject of this article.  Logical Cowboy (talk) 02:43, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI
Talk:Henry Repeating Arms

message: Placing this request here due to potential COI:
As the bottom entry under https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Repeating_Arms#Products, this model has just been announced & is not found on https://www.henryusa.com/henry-firearms/ as of today's date.
At SHOT Show 2024, Henry announced the release of the Henry Lever Action Supreme model that uses AR-pattern magazines and is threaded for  muzzle devices. It is chambered for 300 Blackout or 223 Remington. LoVeloDogs (talk) 20:55, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potential COI - add new model introduced in 2024 

message: I've already added the relevant copy, but am submitting the citation here due to my COI as an employee of GunBroker.com:
Under ===Products=== (with proposed citation):
In 2023, Henry released the Henry Homesteader, a 9mm pistol caliber carbine that has adapters to take their propriety magazines, or certain  GLOCK, SIG Sauer, or Smith & Wesson M&P magazines. LoVeloDogs (talk) 22:00, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding citation from COI
Talk:Henry Meadows

message: Looks like both Rover and Meadows were making Meteor engines from 1944 (the tank version of the Rolls-Royce Merlin). Tricky sorting out exactly what the Ministry of Supply shadow factories were doing. Could be one made parts, another assembled, could be both worked independently to reduce the risk of one bomb raid stopping all production. Probably needs someone to dig in the National Archives where the MoS records are still held to sort out who made what.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oldnoccer (talk • contribs) 12:03, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meteor Engines 
Talk:Amazing Animals

message: What's with the animal names listed next to each episode? What do they mean?
...And why was this show part of the wikipedia Economics project? What does a children's nature show have anything to do with economics? O__o
K00bine 00:05, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi. You know, I have no idea. I removed the animal names as OR after I re-added it, with a reference. I tagged it as OR again. I typed in a hidden message requesting for the anons to tell us what the animal is (the golden gecko award, the animal mentioned in the report, etc). I'll try to see what else I could do. Thanks. ~AH1(TCU) 18:36, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

message: If I remember correctly, this show was made by Dorling Kindersley. I'll try to add that to the article. 70.80.215.121 (talk) 10:26, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Producer 

message: Should this be moved to Amazing Animals pursuant to WP:Common name? The Mysterious El Willstro (talk) 06:12, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. I've never heard this series referred to as anything other than simply Amazing Animals. "Henry's Amazing Animals" appears to be an alternate name for some VHS releases. Either change the article title, or find a citation that supports the "Henry's." Agentspooky (talk) 02:24, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name 

message: Given that Season 4 is considered lost media at this point, how do we know what animal was revealing the title for each of them? Has somebody got all the VHS at home and checked? I'm interested. Dedennedillo (talk) 17:20, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Animals on Title Sequence