Talk:New Zealand Sea Cadet Corps

message: I am trying to get someone who understands templates to knit us a "Naval Cadet" template.  See Wikipedia:Requested templates for the specification. Fiddle Faddle 22:58, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: We have one :)  :Template:Naval cadets Easy to use and in use.  We also have a new category :Category:Naval Cadet Organisations both easy to use. The template ensures the pages are entered into the category Fiddle Faddle 22:39, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nice :) Brian | (Talk) 23:42, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Template

message: :Image:ISCA logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 19:51, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:ISCA logo.gif

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on New Zealand Sea Cadet Corps. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060615065340/http://www.isca-seacadets.org/about_us/ to http://www.isca-seacadets.org/about_us/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:21, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (February 2018) 

message: The text has now twice been removed as a copyright violation by the same editor, even though they were unable to prove any copyvio when this was discussed on my user talk page (see User_talk:Fram#New Zealand Sea Cadet Corps, where I also indicated that if it was a copyvio, they would need to remove other sections as well). Removing copyright violations is a good thing, but removing text from 2005 only because you suspect ir may be a copyvio, even though the source given does now have the same text as our article but did not in 2005, and repeating this when the change has been opposed, is not good, even ignoring whichever further motives may play a role in pursuing this. 
If some stronger arguments can be made that the 2005 text is a copyvio, then of course removing it is the right and necessary course. But accusing people of copyright violations without providing such arguments is a personal attack. Fram (talk) 12:49, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The earliest revisions archived online dont match at all and earwigs only detects current matches - which it would do if the website has copied from ENWP. Cart before the horse. Only in death does duty end (talk) 13:58, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

text: As a secondary note, except in certain jurisdictions and under specific circumstances, you cant copyright lists of facts. So the part about the courses offered cant be a copyvio regardless. Only in death does duty end (talk) 14:00, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

text: *The evidence for the copyright violation is here, a comparison I made before rewriting the lead section. With such precise duplication, it would seem one copied from the other, or they both copied a common source. It is difficult to imagine that the New Zealand Sea Cadet Corps website would resort to copying Wikipedia. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:24, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Given that earwigs is showing information that was in the articles creation in 2005 as substantially matching the website now (and not its earliest revisions) it is more likely that the website maintainer has just copied from wikipedia. Only in death does duty end (talk) 20:10, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio or not 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:24, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion