Talk:Midian

message: This is not very NPOV.... it assumes biblical events & explanations as fact... 
fundies may so believe, but many think thats a crock— Preceding unsigned comment added by  144.136.122.179 (talk • contribs) 01:17, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Although I understand your reasoning, the article mentions multiple times that information on Midian and the Midianites comes largely from the Bible.  --Merovingian (t) (c) 01:19, 8 October 2005 (UTC)

text: I disagree. In instances where the Bible is the only source of information, the Wiki page must include, "according to the biblical book of Numbers..." or words to that effect. For NPOV, one cannot take ANY single source as factual, even if that single source is the Bible... especially if it's the Bible! --Edward-F (talk) 03:19, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

text: P.S. When writing or editing an encyclopaedic article, the onus is not on the editor to prove the current source wrong. The source has to be proven right for it to be presented as fact.--Edward-F (talk) 03:21, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Just out of interest, which books/sources would you consider to be proven right from around this period, or indeed any period before the printing press?  Epideme (talk) 01:15, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

text:  I agree. This article is a farce. It even speculates about Abraham's motives while he fulfilled god's commission. As the existence of Abraham is very much unproven, never mind his god, this is nowhere near the standard required for an encyclopaedia. It has to go. FergusM1970 (talk) 16:40, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV or not

message: Ive added to the section describing Moses' prescribed punishment for the Midianites. According to the Book of Numbers, he ordered his soldiers to kill all male children, and all non-virgin females. He then allowed the Israelite men to take the virgin women.
Marcadams99 05:23, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moses' Orders 

message: For reference during the discussion:
This article was moved from :Midian to :Midian (son of Abraham) with the edit summary "for consistency".  I don't understand that. Of the sons of Abraham, only Medan has a more significant meaning and that son's article is therefore located at Medan (son of Abraham).  There was no need to move the others, as they are not ambiguous. See WP:NAME. Please comment below as I am inclined to move it (and the others) back. - Fayenatic (talk) 19:47, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article moved 

message: The printable version, when Viewed on Firefox, looks normal, but when printed via Firefox the Hebrew words are reversed -- the correct letters but running left-to-right instead of right-to-left.  This does not happen with IE7, which prints the Hebrew correctly.  Darndest thing.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.178.242.140 (talk) 23:38, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: ODD RESULTS ON FIREFOX

message: Why does it say the name in Arabic?  If we were to put it in more languages, then Greek would probably take a bigger priority.  The Arabic version of the Bible came much later.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 35.11.56.20 (talk) 07:10, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Because the People of the Book, Christians Jews and Islamics speak different languages. In the time of Midian the languages of western Arabia were Afroasiatic Beja, Cushitic, Berber and Omotic Loprieno "Ancient Egyptian" p5 rather than semitic. The writing originated in Arabia and did not come from outside, was not western semitic, Canaanite, Akkadian or Egyptian but rather an Arabian language written in Thamudic script (wasums) developed from rock art.Dr. Muhammed Abdul Nayeem,  p 167  The language at Elat was Egyptian and in Edom was Canaanite c 1450 BC
And because Midyan is an area in Greater Arabia, and its history part of Arabian lore. Asking this question presupposes certain biases and a POV. Have you looked at Midian on a map lately? Putting the Arabic for a place name that is considered in Arabia is as proper as it gets. In any case for non-original research examine Richard Burton's travels through Midian. - Anonymous 208.65.192.1 (talk) 04:07, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why does it say the name in Arabic? 

message: In the time of Midian the languages of western Arabia were Afroasiatic Beja, Cushitic, Berber and Omotic [13] rather than semitic. "Loprieno "Ancient Egyptian" p5"
Does anyone have an actual reference to this comment? I looked the mentioned book up in Google books und could not find anything on p5.
Google Books
Ancient Egyptian "Loprieno" 
http://books.google.com/books?id=5OkIeaxGg2sC&printsec=frontcover&dq=Loprieno+Ancient+Egyptian&hl
August09 (talk) 11:25, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing detail in reference 

message: --Avanduyn (talk) 03:56, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Religious Speculation around Mouth Horeb 

message: It seems to me that the Bible References in it's current form is an attempt at retelling every bible story with midian in it in as condensed a version as possible.  I believe this article needs to be encyclopedic and far more objective in telling us about Midian.  Hence I will use this page as a developmental section as I work toward a replacement section... which may take some time.
Yet it may yet prove that this section will have to be merged with 'History' due to the fact that much of what we know of them comes mostly from the Hebrew scriptures.--Avanduyn (talk) 03:41, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Bible References Secton 

message: I noticed that this article makes no mention of any connection between the Midianites and the son of Abraham. So, I removed the redirect from "Midian (son of Abraham)" and made that a separate article on the person. But I also notice that the article on Abraham says he is the founder of the Midianites. If this is correct, then I think it should be mentioned in this article; if it's not correct, it needs to be removed from the Abraham article. Aristophanes68 (talk) 15:32, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Any connection to [[Midian (son of Abraham)]]? 

message: The section Geographical location and culture says that "The Midianites were nomadic shepherds who ... lived in tents of goat hair and ate mostly bread ...". Being nomadic, presumably they got their bread from Greggs the Bakers?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.97.218.33 (talk) 18:30, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do nomadic shepherds grow corn? 

message: Maybe I am missing something, but shouldn't there be a section on Midian pottery? 
Sources: 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Midianite_pottery 
http://www.bible.ca/archeology/bible-archeology-midianite-pottery.htm RANDOM78 (talk) 20:45, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Midianite pottery 

message: i know it seems anachronistic, slightly, but considering that abraham probably never actually existed, i'd just like to throw out the idea of associating this person with the medes, rather than an arabic tribe, and if anybody is willing to tie that to the brahma/abraham similarity.
It is not just anachronistic, it makes no sense and exhibits a certain bias. Whether you think or modern scholarship thinks Abraham existed or not is irrelevant. The character, his name, and his linkage with origin stories for the Midianites and their region, Midian, is part of the lore of the Semitic speaking peoples of the region, both Arab and Israelite, and has been for thousands of years. There is absolutely no base from antiquity to even more tendentiously and tenuously link him to the Medes outside of modern linguistic speculation, mostly of a Hindu/Aryan/Iranian nationalist religio/nationalistic bent. - Anonymous 208.65.192.1 (talk) 04:12, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  median? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Midian. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050721134132/http://etext.library.adelaide.edu.au/b/burton/richard/b97m/preface1.html to http://etext.library.adelaide.edu.au/b/burton/richard/b97m/preface1.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051024234638/http://www.gemsinisrael.com/e_article000002707.htm to http://www.gemsinisrael.com/e_article000002707.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:52, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018) 

message: , you are currently re-inserting the same text over and over, over the objections of multiple editors. This is edit-warring, and a failure to observe the norms outlined at WP:CONSENSUS. Instead of violating Wikipedia policy by repeatedly inserting your preferred version of things repeatedly, you need to come to the talk page and try to gain consensus first. 
One problem with the text you keep trying to insert is that you have not provided a source for your claim that Midian is first mentioned in the Bible. There are some other problems, but you would need, at the very least, a source first. See WP:V about sources. Alephb (talk) 22:44, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent Reverts 

message: See this regarding my decision to redirect the related stub Midian Mountains, which I created, to this article. Leo1pard (talk) 16:37, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mountains 

message: Objection:
Reference and inference to “religion” of YAWEH(Ancient Israel’s belief in God) as “cult” 23.251.65.204 (talk) 11:00, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: What is your problem with that? Cult is a standard term for religious devotion to deities. Dimadick (talk) 16:08, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  “Cult” 

message: Right now the article reads 
"War against Midian followed. Numbers 31 reports that all but the virgin females were slain and their cities burned to the ground."
while the next sentence mentions 
"Some commentators, for example the Pulpit Commentary and Gill's Exposition of the Bible, note that God's command focused on attacking the Midianites and not the Moabites,[23] and similarly Moses in Deuteronomy directed that the Israelites should not harass the Moabites"
If the direction of gods command and Moses direction are mentioned, should we not also mention Moses 4.31.14-18 ? 
From the King James Bible (https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Numbers%2031%3A14-18&version=KJV)
"14 And Moses was wroth with the officers of the host, with the captains over thousands, and captains over hundreds, which came from the battle.
15 And Moses said unto them, Have ye saved all the women alive?
16 Behold, these caused the children of Israel, through the counsel of Balaam, to commit trespass against the Lord in the matter of Peor, and there was a plague among the congregation of the Lord.
17 Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him.
18 But all the women children, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves."
Right now it reads as if the children of Isreal slaid the Midian male kids and babies as well as the women at the same time as the men. Yet all men were killed during the war and women and children taken prisoner. After the war on the way back Moses wrathfully orders the death of the prisoners, except the virgins. 
The way it is right now is midleading, downplaying the horror ordered by one of the most important figures in the old testament. The murder of prisoners, especially children, in this way can only be described as genocide in our modern days. Also the morals of the ancient Isrealites prevented them from slaying the later victims in the war and they had to be ordered by Moses to commit such acts. 
It seems important, that:
 a) woman and children were first taking prisioners, 
 b) Moses ordered the murder of them, especially the "little ones",  
 c) the surviving virgin females were taken "for themselves" and, as mentioned later on, divided with the rest of the spoils of war.
Request:
If there are no objections I would suggest, pointing out at least points a) - c), for example:
Numbers 31 reports that all men were killed in the war against their cities and the rest of the Midianites were taken prisoner. Brought before Moses, he ordered to kill all prisoners but the virgin females, which he orderd to be divided with the other spoils of war. 
We already have a lengthly discussion about the ethics of this sections on wiki in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Numbers_31 , which could/should be linked to here as well.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:C0:7720:E0E1:DC34:1114:16A3:571F (talk) 15:14, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Murder of the Midian