Talk:Immanentize the eschaton

message: Along with dispensationalist sects, I believe there are other Christian groups which seek to immanentize the eschaton, including groups with postmillennial leanings. I think perhaps that creating a heading for Dispensationalist Christianity suggests that their dispensational views are responsible for their desire to immanentize the eschaton, whereas the movement to immanentize the eschaton may come from other influences. I'm no expert, so I could be off-base. Madnova777 09:55, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Other groups

message: Is there a reason "Immanentize" seems to be spelled incorrectly (cf. "imminent")? —Bkell (talk) 03:24, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, I see, there is actually a different word "immanent". Hmm. —Bkell (talk) 16:06, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

text: Funny, but of another religion, another political model. No relevance for "Immanentize the Eschaton" I presume... Rursus dixit. (mbork3!) 07:39, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling 

message: I guess he simply copycated the notion from classical Marxism and rephrased it to inrecognizability (sorry for the clumsy word, I simply translated "oigenkännlighet" from Swedish)... Rursus dixit. (mbork3!) 07:18, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Ueeeh?

message: http://0-media-cdn.foolz.us/ffuuka/board/tg/image/1333/42/1333425663132.jpg  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CEA3:2500:2876:FFE7:AE47:2DC2 (talk) 20:54, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: related picture

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Immanentize the eschaton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://archive.is/20130415182151/http://www.profam.org/pub/rs/rs_1709.htm to http://www.profam.org/pub/rs/rs_1709.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:30, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The article states, " Conservative spokesman William F. Buckley popularized Voegelin's phrase as "Don't immanentize the eschaton!" ".  I was a Buckley fan during that time, and I can attest that the phrase was, "Don't let THEM immanentize the Eschaton!".  Just sayin'.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.72.135.141 (talk) 13:35, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  WF Buckley's phrase 

message: This is a textbook case WP:POV fork and should eventually be merged into realized eschatology. That said, realized eschatology should probably be expanded and improved first, as this will quickly overwhelm it, leading to a undue weight problem. As a start, however, we could at least mention the numerous and widely divergent people who advocate realized eschatology, such as the emerging church or Christian perfection proponents. This article only discusses detractors. Daask (talk) 22:25, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry to disagree: Since the late 1990s, there have been dozens of books written by scholars and journalists on this subject, most of them affiliated with the Center for Millennial Studies at Boston University. The key authors available for citing are listed here: http://www.mille.org/people.html. Even more scholars now have arrived on the scene. The term is still used, but has been replaced by many authors as "Hastening the Apocalypse" when referring to Christian beliefs dating back many centuries.Chip.berlet (talk) 18:42, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV Fork 

message: is this misspelled? shouldn't it be "imminentize"? and what is the source of the misspelling? -lethe talk [ +] contribs 18:45, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  is this misspelled? shouldn't it be "imminentize"?