lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Template talk:Hardcore punk

message: I just removed a link to edit this template that was inserted into the top of the template. It's definitely not standard to include an edit link in a template such as this (see here for other examples). I see why someone might think an edit link is useful: to edit a template someone usually has to manually locate the template page and then edit it from there. I think, however, that it should be a little bit harder to edit templates, making thyem a bit less fluid than articles, and that inserting a link to edit an article of any kind directly is non-standard in general... I'm sure there's a long-standing discussion on this, but I can't find it! Agree or disagree? —Tarnas 02:22, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit link

message: I've removed the gothcore entry from the template, as the gothcore article has been deleted, over lack of verifiability as a widespread musical genre. The deletion debate can be found at this wikilink. Saberwyn - 06:25, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Gothcore removal

message: I fixed it up so it would be structured better, and I deleted dead links.Spylab 03:38, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Reformatted

message: Shouldn't UK82 be under the regional scenes section rather than a subgenre? It seems that the qualifying difference of these bands are the geographic location... Possibly a rename to "United Kingdom" and a move to the lower section of the template are in order... thoughts? TearJohnDown 13:08, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: UK82

message: Just because if has hardcore influence, does not make it a sub-genre of hardcore, so i am removing it.
do try again. 24.139.31.210 (talk) 00:59, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: as stated in the hardcore punk article, thrash has a huge hardcore punk influence, like many other fusion genres listed in the template. "Hardcore spawned several fusion genres and subgenres, some of which had mainstream success, such as melodic hardcore, metalcore, sludge metal and thrash metal." and you can found the hardcore punk template in the thrash metal article, so it stays.--Kmaster (talk) 03:47, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thrash metal
Talk:Nintendo Fusion Tour

message: I believe this article is unreferenced. Where did that list of games and bands come from? And the "internal issues"? This may be original research, if I may say so. While I am sure the information is probably true, it just needs some sources. The page looks great everyone! and thanks to whoever added the latest information about the bands and games, it is very helpful. Sources are the next step. Rockymountains 02:30, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unreferenced article?
Talk:MTV Unplugged (Bob Dylan album)

message: The article as is indicates two sessions only, but per http://www.bjorner.com/94%20a.htm there were three:  Nov. 16, Nov. 17, and Nov. 18.  The Nov. 16 session with "I Pity The Poor Immigrant" needs to be added to the article.  
Unless perhaps this was an untaped rehearsal?Cbben (talk) 16:16, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recording Sessions
Talk:Bob Dylan's Greatest Hits Volume 3

message: It appears there was a 1967 LP with an identical title but different tracklisting and artwork. This appears to be deleted in the US and Europe but I have an Australian version, which is available on this website:  http://www.bangcd.com/productDetail.aspx?prod_id=3002 . Not sure how this fits into the article and don't know enough about the original release to comment, but just thought I'd mention it. --88.109.196.101 17:18, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 1967 LP
Talk:The Bootleg Series Vol. 5: Bob Dylan Live 1975, The Rolling Thunder Revue

message: Since when was this ever packaged with an additional DVD??? Daveman 84 22:26, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have a copy with DVD.  A sticker on the cover says "LIMITED EDITION: Includes DVD featuring performances of "Tangled Up In Blue" and "Isis" in PCM Stereo and 5.1 Digital Surround Sound!" There's also an audio version of Isis.  Total running time of the whole DVD ~ 14 minutes. -- Beardo 22:48, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Bootleg Series Vol. 7: No Direction Home: The Soundtrack

message: I know the recording of this song on this album is rather special, with the shouts and stuff, but I cannot hear what else is shouted from the audience besides "judas", and I would also enjoy some more information on this special concert. I'm sorry I cannot put it out myself but I don't know enough about it.
::Start here: The_Bootleg_Series_Vol._4:_Bob_Dylan_Live_1966%2C_The_%22Royal_Albert_Hall%22_Concert Monicasdude 16:33, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Like a rolling stone

message: The heavy metal singer Bruce Dickinson is linked in the series of producers. I'm pretty sure the flamboyant frontman of Iron Maiden didn't actually produce this record, so I'm deleting the link. If someone can provide proof that he actually produced it, by all means re-link, but please mention something about this movie in the Bruce Dickinson article.
Necromancer 06:13, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  RUN TO THE HIIIIIIIIILLS!!!! 
Talk:Live at The Gaslight 1962

message: As "the Gaslight" is not capitalized in the article, and AMG listing is consistent with this, according to Wikipedia:Naming conventions#Album titles and band names, "...Live at the Gaslight..." is the correct Wiki title. SkierRMH 23:44, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: To revisit this (over 2 years later...), it should be capitalised as The Gaslight per those very same naming conventions: The Gaslight is a proper noun, as it's the name of the cafe in which this album was recorded, and so should be capitalised. AMG's name for this is irrelevant. AllynJ (talk | contribs) 21:25, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Article title
Talk:Dylan (1973 album)

message: As Mark Knopfler wasn't around in 1973 he certainly wasn't playing on any of these tracks...so the whole list of musicians must be suspect. Anybody have the correct list? --Richhoncho (talk) 21:19, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I came here to ask this, and see your message which is now over a year old. I'm going to remove the list. (Knopfler is old enough to have been recording in 1969 but I think his article would mention it!) --kingboyk (talk) 19:25, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Personnel

message: the new coming on of Bob Dylan's Complete album collection vol. 1 have this album as a studio album like basament tapes and not a compilation  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.202.246.125 (talk) 18:03, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  studio album or compilation?
Talk:Bob Dylan's Greatest Hits Vol. II

message: There seems to be a lot of discussion about what was recorded in 1971 beyond the album.  Is this appropriate?  --John (User:Jwy/talk) 07:49, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this about the album or Dylan's activities in 1971 
Talk:New Morning

message: --TheScotch (talk) 17:50, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Went to See the Gypsy 

message: Regarding "Man in Me":
Currently listed as Backing Vocals (with the exception of Maeretha Stewart on "If Dogs Run Free") are:
* Hilda Harris
* Albertin Robinson
Recently released footage of this session clearly shows (at about 40 seconds in) four women with headphones around the microphone. I think we are short by two names. Was Maeretha Stewart one of them? Oldsmobuick (talk) 00:12, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Backing Vocals
Talk:Before the Flood (album)

message: The following paragraph doesn't make sense [or is confusing]:
"Although considered part of both Dylan's and The Band's catalogue, technically the double album was issued on Dylan's label Asylum Records. Dylan signed a new contract with Columbia Records in time for his next studio album, Blood on the Tracks, after returning label president Goddard Lieberson made a determined campaign to get Dylan back from Asylum.[5] The Band continued to record on their own for Capitol Records. Subsequent reissues were on the Columbia imprint, and on March 31, 2009, a remastered digipak version of Before the Flood was issued by Legacy Records, Columbia now part of Sony Music Entertainment."
Is the first sentence meant to state, "Although considered part of both Dylan's and The Band's Columbia catalogue..."?  Even if so, the paragraph still doesn't make a clear point. Fp cassini (talk) 23:25, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  doesn't make sense [or is confusing] 
Talk:Desire (Bob Dylan album)

message: In the wikipedia article section "Recording Sessions" it says that "while being driven in his limousine around the Village, Dylan spotted Scarlet Rivera walking with her violin in the case. Dylan stopped to converse with Rivera and invited her to his rehearsal studio…". 
However in this Village Voice interview from 2011 ( http://www.villagevoice.com/music/interview-famed-bob-dylan-violinist-scarlet-rivera-on-the-chance-nyc-street-meeting-that-changed-her-life-6593138) Scarlet Rivera says:
 -----
VV - It's a wonderful story: You're walking through the Lower East Side, minding your own business, a violin case in your hand, and you get cut off by an ugly green car and the man inside tries to convince you that his name is Danny and that he's from Hungary, but it's really Bob Dylan. And we all know -- and trying to convince you that he's Danny from Hungary is a good example -- that Mr. Dylan is not one to let truth stand in the way of a good story. Is that the way you really met him?
SJ - Yep. Versus some people who would prefer that he drove up in a limousine, because that makes it more fairytale, you know. But unfortunately, it was just an ugly green car, because he didn't want to flash to the world that he was Bob Dylan, obviously, and wanted to go incognito, as he always does.
-----
So it seems that the limousine element is false. The whole story is uncited in wikipedia also. Anyway I don't know much about the way wikipedia is supposed to work, but I thought I would mention this here so someone who does can do whatever the rules say you are supposed to do.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.219.14.142 (talk) 22:04, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  picking up Scarlet Rivera
Talk:Slow Train Coming

message: The account of his conversion is great here, and well-sourced, but could the sources be properly cited? I'm considering creating a new article specifically on his conversion and the debate surrounding it, but it would be good to know which sources to turn to so as to get the info here (and more). Tix 02:44, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source Citing? 

message: The lengthy section on Dylan's conversion to Christianity is well done, but I think it's out of place here. Certainly the topic is relevant (even essential) to understanding "Slow Train Coming." But such an in-depth treatment seems more a part of Dylan's biography than a discussion of this record album. The Bob Dylan article links to this one for further infomation about his conversion. It ought to work the other way 'round. That is, this article ("Slow Train") should briefly discuss the the conversion as important context for the album, but point elsewhere (either the Bob Dylan article or another separate one) for the full story. Hult041956 16:53, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Whilst I agree in priciple, I suspect that within the main Dylan article, it would get cut down whilst I am not sure that it would be allowed to stay as a separate article. -- Beardo (talk) 21:08, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I suggest retaining the section, but putting it after the text about the album itself.  Arrivisto (talk) 10:50, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  In which article does Dylan's conversion belong? 

message: "and the famous Muscle Shoals Horns, all key elements of the celebrated Muscle Shoals Sound, were also brought in." is accurate.  My understanding is that the Muscle Shoals bunch used the Memphis Horns and that they were the "key element" of their soud as far as horns go.  So, who was playing horns on this session?  Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 16:17, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  I am not sure that the phrase
Talk:Shot of Love

message: "Caribbean Wind" does not seem to have received its first studio performance until March 1981.
Not sure why this is stated but if it is correct it should explain why the main reference work on Dylan performances is being challenged 5910.4: 
5910
Rundown Studios
Santa Monica, California
October 1980
4. Caribbean Wind
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Olofs-Files-Dylan-Performance-Guide/dp/1843820412
Olof's Files: A Bob Dylan Performance Guide: 1980 - 1985 Vol 4 2003 (Bob Dylan All Alone on a Shelf) / Olof Bjorner ISBN: 1843820412
EdRicardo (talk) 14:12, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Caribbean Wind" does not seem to have received its first studio performance until March 1981. 

message: Apparently in August 2012, the list of outtakes from the Shot of Love sessions was removed.  I don't understand why.  The list (though I haven't checked it in detail yet) was closely congruent with Clinton Heylin's account of the activity at these sessions (Bob Dylan: The Recording Sessions).  It's therefore well documented.  And the outtakes are very much part of the story of that album.  What gives, or gave?
Village Explainer (talk) 03:36, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of outtakes?
Talk:Real Live

message: There is also a rap group from the mid 90's called Real Live. They had an album called "The Turnaround: A Long Awaited Drama" and had a track on the High School High soundtrack. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by LordFRZA (talk • contribs) 16:56, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about Real Live the group?
Talk:Knocked Out Loaded

message: "However, in recent years the album has been rediscovered and is considered by some fans as among Dylan's most fascinating efforts."
This badly needs a reference. Could someone please come up with one? - Otherwise I recommend deletion. I have never seen this album described as `fascinating', and I'm in the died-in-the-wool-follower-of-Dylan category. --86.132.131.15 21:31, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, unknowing readers are being misled. I will remove it. -- Dawson1066 22:09, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference Needed

message: The song Junco Partner  sung by various artists e.g. The Holy Modal Rounders (recorded 1964 according to sleeve notes on the compilation album Blues in the Bottle, CDWIK 71, 1988,  contains the lyrics in the first verse
Down the road
Down the road
Down the road
Came Junco Partner, partner, partner
He was loaded as can be
He was knocked out, knocked out loaded
He was loaded with misery
It would seem possible that Bob Dylan had heard this song and used these words for the album title.
Jpurssey (talk) 19:47, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Junco Partner is a traditional blues tune from Louisiana that's been done by a bunch of famous artists, including The Clash and Harry Connick Jr.  The lyrics tend to change, but the line "He was knocked out, knocked out loaded" seems pretty consistent.  I feel it's likely the origin of this album's title, but obviously a reputable source would have to be found.  p.355 of Keys To The Rain by Oliver Trager (available on google books) mentions this, but it seems speculative even there.72.199.28.81 (talk) 20:47, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Album Title
Talk:The 30th Anniversary Concert Celebration

message: :Image:30thAnniversaryConcert.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 05:32, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:30thAnniversaryConcert.jpg

message: BOB DYLAN 30TH ANNIVERSARY CONCERT CELEBRATION 2-DVD SET clapton harrison petty  
http://www.ebay.com/itm/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=220936654954&ssPageName=ADME%3AB%3AEF%3AUS%3A1123
Is this a genuine DVD set from Sony or some form of pirate or bootleg? 
EdRicardo (talk) 17:50, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  DVD legit? 

message: Where or how do I go about buying the cds Ecasani (talk) 22:12, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bob Dylan 30th Anniversary
Talk:The Essential Bob Dylan

message: On BobDylan.com, Visions of Johanna is NOT listed on the album and Quinn (The Mighty Eskimo) is listed in its place. I own this album and can say it's not Visions of Johanna. Should be changed, but thought I'd mention it for now. Atrivedi (talk) 02:40, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Track Listing
Talk:Carriage

message: Searching for rolling backpacks, I found this interesting photo of a "walking trailer" for long distance walking, and wondered if they are within the scope of this article? Sauer202 (talk) 20:51, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: No. This article is about the horse-drawn vehicle type. For other uses, see Carriage (disambiguation), wikt:carriage, Trailer, or wikt:trailer.    ▶ I am Grorp ◀  20:47, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Human-powered personal carriage
Talk:Bull man

message: Where would one even begin? --Wetman 02:48, 6 September 2005 (UTC)

message: This article clearly has the same subject as the Shedu article, even when Lamassu redirects to Shedu. This article is more informative, so should be the basis for merger IMHO. Mhaesen 17:44, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's because the main article is spelled lammasu.  Shedu includes, these, which are winged lions, not bull-men.  This merging would be incorrect.  See below by 70.16.132.141 .  - C. dentata  05:08, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge with Shedu
Talk:Anosov diffeomorphism

message: Pardon me if I'm missing something, but I'm wondering why this page concentrates so much on Anosov flows. As I understand it, Anosov diffeomorphisms are significantly different to Anosov flows: Anosov diffeomorphisms act nontrivially on the homotopy and homology groups of the manifold, whereas Anosov flows, being homotopies, do not; and the time-one map of an Anosov flow is never an Anosov diffeomorphism. As such, I'm not sure how relevant to this article Anosov flows actually are. Shouldn't they be in a separate article? --Invisible Capybara 17:30, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flows vs. diffeomorphisms 

message: I think there's a mistake. 
"A sufficient condition for transitivity is nonwandering: \Omega(f)=M""
I guess this is not true. For instance, take the Identity operator on a give space M. Then you have \Omega(Id)=M but clearly, it is not transitive, since it has no dense orbit.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.153.125.222 (talk) 13:26, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The identity is not an Anosov diffeomorphism, so that's not a counterexample. In any case, I'm pretty sure the statement in question is still only conjectured, although the nonwandering set does at least split into finitely many transitive components.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.235.163.229 (talk) 22:14, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sufficient condition for transitiveness
Talk:J Harlen Bretz

message: The articles sates the cause of disbeliefs in his theories is due to: "Tlack of familiarity with the remote areas of the interior Pacific Northwest where the research was based, and the lack of status and reputation of Bretz in the eyes of the largely Ivy League-based geology establishment." Wasn't it also vastly refused merely because it smacked of catastrophism? I remember watching a series on this and even looked it up a little bit a few years ago. Bryanpeterson 16:36, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, yes, in the preceding paragraph it says "This view, which was seen as arguing for a Catastrophic explanation of the geology, was against the prevailing view of uniformitarianism, and Bretz's views were initially discredited."  Cheers Geologyguy 18:03, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: outrageous hypothesis

message: This article from NOVA states: J Harlen Bretz, whose first name was "J" (no period necessary)...   It uses  "J" without the period throughout.   Shouldn't the  redirect at J Harlan Bretz and the article here be reversed, and the article be edited to use "J Harlan Bretz"? -- Kbh3rd 02:49, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: OK. I just dug out my copy of Caves of Missouri, and yes it's the same chap - quite an accomplished geologist. Seems Grandpa's name was formally J Harlen Bretz - no period and e intead of a, even though he is known as Harlan by his family. Thanks Richard for the note, I did a bit of spelunking/speleology in the Ozarks back in the early '70s and his book is great. Vsmith 19:53, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  J or J.
Talk:Anne Burrell

message: This is a new stub, but I can't figure out for the life of me how to add the stub boilerplate to it. Can someone help? Danlovejoy 02:52, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: better late than never? -Superbeecat 09:27, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Anglo-Saxon mythology

message: Hello everyone,
I have created an article on Anglo-Saxon religion and beliefs, which can be found at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo-Saxon_religion
I propose that we merge this article into the one I have created, since it is more definitive and will enhance both of them.  We can set this article heading as a redirect, since we are really dealing with Anglo-Saxon religion and not only their mythology, which is but a component.
If there are no objections, I can get started on merging the two soon.
Yogensha 03:00, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Technical research ship

message: Please check the other articles in the US Navy ships category. You'll see that no other ship type is listed, because they belong in the Ship types category. You're welcome to ensure that each of these individual ships are in the proper category, but this article is about the type of ship, not a ship. Jinian 03:04, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category 

message: Currently, the article says: "In order to transmit intelligence information that had been gathered back to United States for further processing and analysis, these ships had a special system named Technical Research Ship Special Communications, or TRSSCOM (pronounced tress-com)."  This is a misleading statement.
Not all TR type ships had TRSSCOM.  TRSSCOM provided a slow-speed, encrypted Teletype channel, not a high-speed data channel capable of transmitting large volumes of raw "intelligence" data for processing elsewhere, as implied in the quote.  Instead, large volumes of collected "intelligence" data (mostly the form of magnetic recording tapes) was physically sent to NSA by means of a courier -- the equivlent of what is known these days as "sneakernet."
A more accurate statement would be: "In order to transmit some collected intelligence and operational information back to the United States, some of these ships had a special system named Technical Research Ship Special Communications, or TRSSCOM (pronounced tress-com), in addition to transmitters and receivers for the U.S. Navy's standard high frequency radio communications network."Ken (talk) 17:17, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  TRSSCOM