Talk:Senegambia Confederation

message: Hello, wiki community. I was wondering if someone could explain to me what need to done to this article in terms of wikification. I did the last major addition to it and I want to know what needs to be done. --chemica 08:54, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Regarding wikification - question

message: *"Had it succeeded, it would not only have solved economic tensions between the neighboring countries but given new hope to the concept of Pan-Africanism."  Is that really encyclopedia-worthy?  I'd say no. Oldkinderhook 21:35, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Is this encyclopedic?

message: "French trade centered on the Senegal River and in the Cape Verde region" --History section
Cape Verde is a former Portuguese colony located off the western coast of Africa and named after Cap-Vert, a peninsula in Senegal. Both of them mean Green Cape. I think French didn't center in Cape Verde but in Cap-Vert. But I don't have any references right now. --Kurihaya (talk) 11:17, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cape Verde or Cap-Vert 

message: I thought that a confederation itself is loose.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.102.9.101 (talk) 11:23, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Loose Confederation? 

message: Where is the basic country data block? You know, capital, government type, official language(s), location, establishment date, etc.
There are a lot of questions that pop into mind, now that I know that this Senegambia thing existed. Like, why is this not listed at UN member states? Did it have a flag of its own? What was its currency? etc...Mátyás (talk) 13:47, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You haven't written it yet. This is a volunteer effort.  Please research and expand this article if you so desire.  T L Miles (talk) 17:12, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

text: The problem is the Senegambia Confederation never lasted long enough to function like a unified region. There was never a capital. There was a very short-lived legislative body. It is not a UN member state because it lasted only a few years so they would not have applied for membership. The Senegambia Confederation was more of an experiment in shared governance between Sénégal and the Gambia that failed. --chemica (talk) 22:05, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not much info... 

message: What is this?  It says in the article to see "Sandwich Sovereignties" "above", but this is the only mention of the term in the article... Tomertalk 14:39, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Here's the first version of the article 2004.  The "see Sandwich Sovereignties above," was part of an old style inline citation that was cut off when a ref tag was added.  It a sub heading in the referenced work, I believe. T L Miles (talk) 21:01, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sandwich Sovereignties 

message: It says Senegal got threats from Nkrumah's Ghana but he had been both dead and out of office for a long time by then.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.162.221.197 (talk) 04:52, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nkrumah's Ghana?

message: What exactly is disputed in the "End of the Confederation" section? The POV tag was set in April 2012 without any explanation, attempt at discussion, or then-recent edit to cause this tag. Varana (talk) 18:10, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality disputed?