Talk:Winx Club

message: Layla/Aisha is really only a feminist in the 4kids versions; she is actually quite shy and submissive in the original version. I tried to put something explaining that in her character guide.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.116.249.69 (talk) 00:11, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Layla

message: That is most definitely wrong, you might be following the 4kids version there, they become guardian fairies of the magic dimension, not queens! Winxrocker (talk) 10:38, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Queens of their planets?

message: Hey, I have the first batch of English titles for "Winx Club".  I needs to be formatted, if you please. User:NoseNuggets 08:25 PM EDT 05/26/05.
I would like if I get help, or at the least a "OK" from the major contributors of the article, to rewrite the article into two distinct catagories to properly explain the first and second seasons.  It is my opinion that article is messy, with overlapping information/spoilers and US/italian conversions making it worse.--Kevin586 19:31, August 14, 2005 (UTC)
I ahppen to like to piolers.  Just put a Spoliers warnning on there and let people decide for themselves. THe article isnt that messy. THe only part that needs cleaning is the hamburgeress TRIX (69.150.74.114 21:08, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distinguishing first and second season premises 

message: Which name is correct?
I never saw the original edition (I only saw the 4KIDS TV edition, so I think it's Mariam. or Miriam. Or... well. it's the M at the end. But I'm not really sure. --Addict 2006 17:23, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The person who is Queen of Domino. Mariam? Marian? 

message: I heard about this reference several times but I never seen any actual evidence that she is infused with any cyberneticss.  Can someone point me to any Winx Club comic or animated series episode that assert she is half-machine?--Kevin586 19:10, September 6, 2005 (UTC)
:It was never established in the tv show that Tenca was half-cyborg. That was a fan fiction idea two years ago that took off as the biggest rumor on the internet for Winx Club. Some would argue she is because her Winx comes from technology, as evidenced in season 2 when she took control of a Red Fountain ship, but it has never officially been mentioned she is.
In the booklet that came with the 1st two DVDs released in Australia it says in the section about Tecna "Others: She is half android".
In one episode when Tecna cries she says "I didn't know I could cry" which could mean shes a cyborg  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.44.82.192 (talk) 15:15, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Which one? -- JSH-alive (talk)(cntrbtns)(mail me) 07:28, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

text: I'm not sure about the booklet since there isn't a source, picture, or signature for it... Could anyone clarify?Cailunetrawr 03:02, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tecna: is she really Cyborg? 

message: In my opinion, Winx is the compound word of Minx and Wink 성혀니
:It's a neologistic transformation of "wings"... --Neigel von Teighen 21:06, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The word : '''Winx''' 

message: Should the content the Icy, Stormy, and Darcy be integerated in the primary Winx club article? list your vote supporting or opposing with optional explaination.
*Merge - I am all for them.  Please merge the Icy and Darcy article into this one.--Caesius 17:12, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  2006 Icy, Storm, and Darcy merge request 

message: On other Winx Club websites I saw that there will be third season of Winx Club with 2 new Winx girls. I really couldn't understand when it was going to air because they spoke spanish. ---These are bad rumors that have been copied from site to site all summer long.
The Third season has been announced on 4kids TV, but there isn't any info on the 2 new Winx girls yet.
User:Coconutfred73
:There are a couple of preview pics on winxclub.com, currently showing Bloom and Flora in 'enchantrix' mode and a new villian celled Baltor. [] Nisa Tunesque 10:33, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Third season

message: the sections that are long shoud be placed in their own articles, then the Winx Club others article could be re-merged into the main article. --Cartoonborg 22:30, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: To that mind, I'm suggesting a 'List of minor Winx Club characters', like the List of minor Sailor Moon characters.  Hopefully people will like the idea. - Malkinann 11:58, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Splitting the sections into seprate articles 

message: The question before us is simple as it difficult: should the major editors merge Winx Club and Winx Club Others?  List Oppose or support with an explaination, if you like.
Support if certain conditions are met - The current Winx Club article is serious need of pruning and editing to accomidate the possible merge.  First and formost, the current winx club article should be abot the television program as opposed to its current "universe"-like definition.  What I suggest is eliminating most of the character entries of characters who only appeared once and/or do not contribute the major story of the series.  The "monsters" section should also eliminated.--Kenn Caesius 20:12, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The way the article is being edited, we may just have to go that route.  I have completed linking the main protagonist to thier unique article and I have to say it probably would be best.  I hope that future editors (if I do not get to it first) will shorten the current entries in the main article and/or complete the suggested merge.  In the next few days, I hope to start addding those superhero templates to each of the winx club characters.--Kenn Caesius 21:20, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds like a good plan to me. Just gald somw work is being done on the articles.Cartoonborg 17:40, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The July 2006 Merge Discussion

message: Having worked the article for Bloom for the past few days, I have about a situation that all editors should consider: How to adress the discrepancies across the different versions of the winx club.  Doing some quick reseach for the bloom article, bloom has about three different birthdays and the spelling of her homeplanet different.  There is no doubt that as the editing continues we will continue to find more.  To address in the artcle this, I would recommend the following
Citing the controversy of the editing and censoring done by 4kids Entertainment in the north american version of the winx club, I do not consider it accurate an source or representation of the original italian version.  In the bloom article I have been creating, I retrieved most the information and spelling from wwww.winxclub.com and not www.winxclub.tv, a 4kids entertainment website.  The .com is supported by the production company that created the series.
With this in mind, I would suggest that future editors try to verify the appropriate information against the .com website.  Please keep any questions or comments in this discussion page.--Kenn Caesius 17:01, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The article should include the information from all version of the show and compare and contrast the different versions. Cartoonborg 17:39, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Naturally, if I can ever find the time to update the biograhapy of Bloom, I plan to add a subsection explaining the discrepancies between the original Italian version, the 4Kids version, the Cartoon network version, and whatever popular and edited version fans have noted.--Kenn Caesius 05:26, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Standards across different versions

message: Hi!  My name's K-9 LVR, I'm a big fan of Winx Club, and I've decided to set up some recaps for the episodes!  It's really fun, but Season 1 is also kind of hard, because it's been a while, and I'm going from memory.  Anyone can chip in if they want to, and they know I've missed something; I won't mind! -- K-9 LVR 00:08, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: P.S. I'm not sure how to get recaps for Grounded, Junior League, or Fire and Ice, because those link to completely different websites!  Can I get some help on that?
Its quite a ambitious project you have decided to undertake however I am not at all sure about spending the time and effort in creating individual episode articles in light the of the current problems with the main winx club article.
On the subject of how to best list the episodes of the winx club, for the time being I would suggest a listing like the List of South Park episodes but without the links to every episode: there are just not enough editors knowledgeable or dedicated enough to create and maintain them (yet).  As always, if anyone thinks they have a better idea, we should have discussion and vote on it.--Kenn Caesius 19:29, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

text: I'm fine with "spending the time and effort" because I personally don't know what the current problems are; I've only just started looking at this discussion page.  As for the List of South Park episodes thing, I'm not sure I can accomplish that; I don't know how.  If you can show me, I'd appreciate it. -- K-9 LVR 20:56, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: On second thought, don't.  I'm going to continue on like I chose to start. -- K-9 LVR 21:19, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Season 1 Recaps, at your Service! 

message: I have removed one hopeless entry because I could not rewrite to make any sense have editted the rest so that they would.  However, I seriously considering deleting them soon: me reason for doing so is most the "edits" mentioned are neglible and would perhaps fall under the catagory of localization, which simply cannot be helped in international releases
The other reason I will considering removing the content is because the reliability is questionaable.  The removed entry refering to changes in "Miss Magix" seems to describe the episode as it aired under the 4Kids TV banner.
Finally some of this content would be best included in episode summeries as per my suggestion in the hidden comments.  Unless some disagrees, I will ultimately remove all edits within the next week.--Kenn Caesius 18:13, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additions to "Criticism" section 

message: In season 3, there is a new bay guy but the name is still a mystery eventhough 4Kids already air it and name him ""Baltor"" but on Winx Club offical website him name is called ""Valtor""
:I have noticed that as well and have also seen that character named "Boltor" in some pages. when major editors get around to cleaning-up the season articles, I hope that we can address such discrepancies in a subsection.--Kenn Caesius 21:19, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Baltor/Valtor 

message: I think there is enough information of the plot to mention it briefly in the main article and go into detail in a article of its own with one of those "television program in progress" tags.  Would anyone disagree?--Kenn Caesius 19:29, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd like to see it three times as long before we split it off.  I'm sure it can be done.  :) - Malkinann 23:38, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Enough for a Season 3 article?

message: Here http://www.winxclubontour.com/ there seems to be a Winx Club musical in Italy that is touring the Netherlands.  Does anyone know more about it, or can they understand the site?  - Malkinann 23:38, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think I have the gist of it: according to the "news" posts from the winx club section from michaels favorites this winx club tour is a live-action musical production that performs in malls in America (and Europe obviously) that promotes winx club merchandise. I recall a while a back that the 4Kids winxclub.tv site had advertisements and schedules for such performance.  I am unsure about adding what I know citing its heresay and conjecture.--Kenn Caesius 23:59, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Winx Club Musicals?

message: I've found this toy, an automatic peer review suggestions bot, and I ran it through the Winx Club article.  
The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.
*Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at WP:LEAD. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.
*Per WP:WIAFA, Images should have concise captions.
*Per WP:CONTEXT and WP:BTW, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006, but do not link January 2006.
*Per WP:MOS#Headings, headings generally do not start with the word 'The'. For example, ==The Biography== would be changed to ==Biography==.
*Per WP:MOS#Headings, headings generally should not repeat the title of the article. For example, if the article was Ferdinand Magellan, instead of using the heading ==Magellan's journey==, use ==Journey==.
*Please alphabetize the interlanguage links.
*Per WP:WIAFA, this article's table of contents (ToC) may be too long- consider shrinking it down by merging short sections or using a proper system of daughter pages as per WP:SS.
*There are a few sections that are too short and that should be either expanded or merged.  
*Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
**While additive terms like “also”, “in addition”, “additionally”, “moreover”, and “furthermore” may sometimes be useful, overusing them when they aren't necessary can instead detract from the brilliancy of the article. This article has 10 additive terms, a bit too much.
**Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant -  “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
*Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Malkinann 07:16, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Automated Peer Review Suggestions

message: Is the "Winx Club - Cut It Out!" link even allowed to stay on? It just got removed. --Addict 2006 14:17, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I would have to concede to probably not.  As informative as the link is, it may not pass the standards set by Wikipedia's reliable sources, Additionally, it was removed another time in the past with with a comment that such linking is using up more bandwidth that the creator is allotted.--Kevin586 18:04, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comparison link 

message: I seriously doubt spin-offs relating to Stell and Trix are true.  I have conducted informal research using the the search string "winx club +spin-off" on google and yahoo! searches about the closest those words get together is during a discussion of fan fiction.  I say that if no source is provided by the end of this month, the entire section should be removed.--Kevin586 18:48, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Calling shenanigans on "undeveloped" 

message: But I think that history will absolve me.  I have gone ahead and created the new season three article as the section was becoming too large and with new episode of the series premiering weekly now, it is only bound to get larger.  I will update the to-do list next to removed its mention and request that future editors focus thier attention on copyediting the content of all winx club articles.--Kevin586 18:32, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  sorry for disregarding the split discussion... 

message: Going the official website just posted by an editor, I have noticed some discrepancy of the title: according to the italian text on the bottom is its winx club - il segrete de regno perduto which (off the top of my head ) translates into "secret of the lost king". However, when the preview is over, its simply winx club il film.  Can someone suggest how to deal with this?--Kevin586 06:16, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the correct name of the feature film? 

message: They have just released volume 3 of season two a little whille ago , just though you might like to know. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 124.184.174.220 (talk) 06:12, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  About DVDs in Australia 

message: I have reviewed most the of the unofficial links and nearly all of them are poorly made fansites with no useful information.  Unless someone can justify their inclusion in this article, I will be removing them by the Tuesday, May 8th.--Kevin586 18:07, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Since there no discussion (and tacitly, no opposition), I have removed all but one unofficial links.  I am familiar with "michael's favorites" series of sites and know that they are an informative and reliable source.--Kevin586 17:38, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unofficial links - Do we really need them? 

message: I've assessed this article for WP:TV as requested here. I have rated this article as start class because the relatively short length and lack of important sections like critical response, production etc. and as low importance because there is little to distinguish it from other articles about television series. These categories are arbritrary and are subject to review by any editor who feels confident to do so. 
I think the article really needs a response section. Has the show ever won an award? Has it ever been reviewed by a television critic? What are the ratings figures like? It would also benefit from a production section detailing the crew, animators, how the show is made, how it was conceived etc. At the moment the article is all plot and characters and there is very little out of universe perspective given.
There is information in the lead that is not part of the main article - the lead should be a summary of the content of the main article. See WP:Lead for advice on constructing the lead of the article. 
Please note that a more formal assessment by other editors is required to achieve good article or featured article status. I used criteria from the television wikiproject guidelines here, article about TV series guidelines here and the assessment guidelines here.--Opark 77 09:38, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article assessment

message: it says on floras page that 4kids changed her planets name, but in the season 3 lucy went 2 baltor and told him that they were going to linyphea, not wat they changed it 2, CONFUSION did they change the name? Joseph mitchell9 23:17, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  linyphea 

message: Please translate Japanese!!221.79.35.16 (talk) 10:21, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ...why would there be Japanese in the article?--Blue-EyesGold Dragon 12:10, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Translate Japanese

message: As requested I began some proofreading. I mainly fixed typos and adjusted bad grammar and style, as I am not very familiar with the contents of the series. I will remove the Style tag as soon as I am done, please let me know if you disagree. Also, I believe that the part about the Winx Musical should be moved to a separate article, or even removed completely. Is a musical only shown in Italy and Netherlands really worthy of more than a couple of lines, just for information? Are the names of the various actors/dancers worthy of inclusion? They simply elongate the article without reason in my opinion. Quatonik (talk) 21:01, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proofreading 

message: Oh my tian, I'm getting soooo sick of those vandalism by many IP addresses! Its about time we semi-protect this article! >_< Agree? Tikal-chan (talk) 14:13, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have to agree.  What are the procedures to get this page protected from anonymous users?--Kevin586 (talk) 16:29, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Click here for the instructions to do so. Tikal-chan (talk) 06:23, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protect? 

message: ===Title of episode articles===
I was so surprised when I saw the article about the very first episode is titled "It Feels Like Magic" (4Kids version's title) while "An Unexpected Event" (Title used in the Rainbow's English dub) is a redirect to that article.
Then, two ideas quickly came to mind;
# All the articles about the Winx Club episodes are named "Winx Club season X episode OO" rather than episode titles from Rainbow’s English dub or 4Kids version so we can keep WP:NPOV.
# However, since it seems like 4Kids reshuffled episodes order in season 3, using Italian titles would also better. (Not direct translation. Example: "Una fata a Gardenia," NOT "A fairy from Gardenia.")
Which idea do you prefer?
==="Sparx," in the Rainbow's official site?===
When citing www.winxclub.com's English edition, I think we should be careful, as the edition seems currently for the UK where they get 4K's version.
===Is the birthday a part of continuity?===
I watched the episodes from the first to fifty second. However, I heard no mention of characters' birthdays, although two "official" sites mention two different dates per one character. How about this? In the infobox, data for birth date goes "Not mentioned during the TV series [1]" while the ref tag goes;
#. ^ www.winxclub.com mentions the character’s birthday as 00 Remember while www.4kids.tv/show/winx mentions as 99 Desire.
===P.S.===
# Is there a DVD that exclusively contains English version available? I mean PAL aspect ratio, 25fps with episode title cards in English and English audio.
# I wish someone make a petition for the Italian season 3 DVD with Italian and English audio, both in stereo.
# Can someone ask Rainbow S.p.A. for split winxclub.com's English edition into "three editions", one for UK, another for Asia, the other for rest of the world?
# To end this post, here's my pure original research. Don't post them on the main article.
## From second season, Rainbow changed intro song's English lyrics to "Open your eyes..." May be, it is the response to the 4K's intro beginning with "Close your eyes..."?
## Rainbow introduced Musa's "father" in the second season and "princess" of her home planet in third season, to make 4K confusing? (4K introduced Musa "as the princess" in the first season)--JSH-alive (talk)(cntrbtns)(mail me) 13:51, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'm throwing such suggestions... 

message: # Is there a DVD that exclusively contains English version available? I mean PAL aspect ratio, 25fps with episode title cards in English and English audio.
# I wish someone make a petition for the Italian season 3 DVD with Italian and English audio, both in stereo.
# Can someone ask Rainbow S.p.A. for split winxclub.com's English edition into "three editions", one for UK, another for Asia, the other for rest of the world?
# To end this post, here's my pure original research. Don't post them on the main article.
## From second season, Rainbow changed intro song's English lyrics to "Open your eyes..." May be, it is the response to the 4K's intro beginning with "Close your eyes..."?
## Rainbow introduced Musa's "father" in the second season and "princess" of her home planet in third season, to make 4K confusing? (4K introduced Musa "as the princess" in the first season)--JSH-alive (talk)(cntrbtns)(mail me) 13:51, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: P.S.

message: hi i'm posting this here and on the winx club disscusion page. why did you delete my section on Nabu on the main page. to me it only make sense to have him listed there as he is the boyfriend/fiancee. all the other girls boyfriends are listed there and still have more info on them under the  List of minor Winx Club characters#The Specialists page.Inferno17 (talk) 16:57, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: why delete Nabu info from main winx page

message: is there any news on the us release of the winx club The Secret of the Lost Kingdom movie?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.19.28.245 (talk) 23:27, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: winx movie info

message: Okay, so I noticed some pages use Baltor (like the Template:Winx_Club and the Winx Club (season three), but others use Valtor, such as List of minor Winx Club characters and List of Winx Club episodes. Which one should we use? Matty-chan (talk) 08:33, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which version is more applicable? 

message: Ummm, guys... please do not discuss the article's subject here. This is for discussion of the article and ways to improve it. We do not need to know that Winx Club is a hentai search term or that it ripped off W.I.T.C.H. because the main character has red hair and they're about girls learning magic. I cleaned up the talk page. Matty-chan (talk) 08:53, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: "it ripped off W.I.T.C.H. because the main character has red hair and they're about girls learning magic" Wow. That's a deliberate understatement. 69.247.182.247 (talk) 04:05, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleaned up talk page - Wikipedia is NOT a soapbox or a forum 

message: Based on the List of Naruto characters, new layout of character list page, to be named List of Winx Club characters, is under construction. It is located at User:JSH-alive/Sandbox/WC characters.
I will do my best for the layout. However, I need your help with the content. Therefore, you can improve the sandbox by adding content and gathering sources.
By the way, what should I do with the Redfountain specialists? Consider them as "protagonists" or "other characters"? -- JSH-alive (talk)(cntrbtns)(mail me) 12:29, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  A new character list layout idea 

message: I keep seeing sections about this, but no sources. I've found fan-made videos on youtube, but no proof on the official site, in Italian or English. Should I just remove the unsourced information relating to the Elementix? Cailunetrawr 01:47, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elementix? 

message: Basically, 4kids vs. the original... Should we have some sort of guideline for whether which we use? And which one should we use?Cailunetrawr 02:55, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure... That's the entire reason why I was asking, but since the original is well, the original, then maybe we should use that? Cailunetrawr 18:04, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Names: 4kids vs. Italian version 

message: Yep. There's no official Japanese version yet. However, someone's adding incorrect role on the articles on the Japanese voice actresses. What should I do? -- JSH-alive talk • cont • mail 06:05, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Could you elaborate on the problem?  The winx club has its on Japanese language article and therefor should be available in Japan.  If someone is adding dubious information to the English-language version of Seiyuu articles, it could just an honest mistake or outright vandalism at worse.--Kencaesi (talk) 16:55, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No. There's NO official Japanese dub yet but someone in the Japanese WP translated an Italian WP article on it to explain Winx Club. (I questioned Japanese WP about an article on the programme that has never aired in Japan (:ja:Wikipedia:Help for Non-Japanese Speakers/Archive/Questions about the usage and rules of Japanese Wikipedia#이 문서를 어찌합니까?) but they are not going to delete it.) Remember. There is NO official Japanese dub, as of now. -- JSH-alive talk • cont • mail 01:02, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Japanese version but there's a Japanese voice cast? 

message: There were still a lot of problems, I think they're fixed now.  Here's a phrase I couldn't work in:
(even though the 4Kids version is shown in the UK, except Welsh language broadcaster S4C)
This may need its own separate sentence, I couldn't quite understand what was meant.  A lot of work went into this article, and it's great the show has remained so popular - definitely notable, I think.  If any further help is needed copyediting, you can contact me at my talk page.--Levalley (talk) 01:24, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second round of copyedits 

message: What I know is:
* In the UK, the 4Kids version was shown on Nickelodeon UK (also available in Republic of Ireland), the ITV network and CITV Channel, and then Pop Girl (also available in ROI).
** But the national Welsh language broadcaster S4C aired Welsh version based on the original version, Not 4Kids'.
* In the Republic of Ireland, RTÉ Two (also available in Northern Ireland) aired Winx Club on their children's block, The Den. However, I don't know which version was aired.
* In Australia, the 4Kids version airs terrestrially on the Network Ten, and throughout cable and sat on Cartoon Network and Boomerang (the latter two also available in New Zealand).
**In New Zealand, it is said that TV3 aired the "so-called UK dub". But I'm not sure. (If it's true, this means NZ gets both versions)
That's it. I wonder if those facts can be added to the end of Variations section, or not to put on anywhere of the article. But it should not be a seed for the revival of the old worldwide syndication section. -- JSH-alive talk • cont • mail 08:38, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  What should I do with these facts? 

message: Go to Template:Winx Club to see what happened. -- JSH-alive talk • cont • mail 13:17, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  ALERT: [[Template:Winx Club]] may contain original researches. 

message: OK. The template is semi-protected for one month. It's time to improve Template:Winx Club a better way. Any ideas? -- JSH-alive talk • cont • mail 13:36, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improvement of [[Template:Winx Club]] 

message: I'm going to nominate this article for deletion. It requires more than eleven references, Amazon.com isn't a reliable source. This article needs expert help from editors of the WikiProject Television or the Television Portal. Wikipedia isn't a place where you can collect random information without reliable sources. An article that has less than 11 references and is categorized as B-class article is NOT NOTABLE!!! If no one responds on why we need to save this article, I'll put it up for deletion tomorrow. Electrode Light 10:04, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'm DELETING this messy article!?! 

message: I tried to edit this article and I was told by User:JSH-alive that I messed up ; quoted I wanted a structure of featured ones like The Simpsons and Tokyo Mew Mew. But you Carly messed up. Now I don't know about you but I thought that an editor's goal is to improve an article into featured status but alas by judging the state of the article it nothing more than Start-class quality with B-class quantity of Low importance.
They're so many stub sections like Production and development, Conception, Albums and soundtracks with two of those sections containing nothing but a template encouraging contributors to expand the section with un-referenced statements. I don't about any of you but I'm tired of seeing the Variations section having no references at all. I tried to fix the article but I was bashed for removing all unsourced material, special thanks to JSH-alive for putting back all the nonsense in the page.
I suggest that User:JSH-alive reads Wikipedia:Writing better articles, Wikipedia:Article size, Wikipedia:Summary style, Wikipedia:Check your facts, Wikipedia:Avoid weasel words, Wikipedia:The perfect article. The fine print should be either delete all the un sourced material or do some research. I would help but I've been discouraged from editing this article. Greene Leigh Online (talk) 11:16, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: All right. Sorry about that. JSH-alive talk • cont • mail 05:16, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quality Over Quantity!! 

message: The article bears a frame saying: 
: "This article has multiple issues. Please help improve the article or discuss these issues on the talk page.
:* It needs additional references or sources for verification. Tagged since January 2008.
:* It needs sources or references that appear in third-party publications. Tagged since January 2008.
:* It describes a work or element of fiction in a primarily in-universe style that may require cleanup. Tagged since January 2008.
:* It is in need of attention from an expert on the subject. WikiProject Television or the Television Portal may be able to help recruit one. Tagged since February 2009.
:* It may require general cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. Tagged since January 2008"
I wonder if these remarks are still relevant; the article has now various references (including in third-party publications), the style seems fine, and seems clean. 
Let me know what are the reasons for the article still to bear this criticism; otherwise I'll remove it.
Notice that I won't touch the "needed expansion" remarks on the various too-short sections. Renato (talk) 10:49, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template still needed? 

message: More than a month ago, I started a topic on the contributions from a user named Coolak. But, no one except the user himself has answered.
So, I want to hear from you, with following issues:
# Edit of Template:Winx Club into the Italian WP one lookalike made by him  (In fact, this has been fixed in days later by another user. (current revision) But, apart from what he did or not, is it necessary to include Vasthy Mompoint in the template?)
# Whether Roxy being a part of Winx or not. (But I think removing Roxy's profile from main article is not a good idea.)
# Other contributions from him. (But it doesn't mean all his contributions are bad. Sometimes, he is really helpful. But what do you think?)
-- JSH-alive talk • cont • mail 05:45, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need your opinion on Coolak's contributions 

message: For those who still think Musa being a Princess, she's really not. In fact, Musa introduced herself as a Princess, but only heard in the 4Kids' version of S1 ep3 ("Save the First Dance" in that version). In the original versions (both Italian language version and Cinelume's English dub) of the episode ("L’anello di Stella"/"Alfea College for Fairies" in those versions), she didn't say so.
Her status is revealed in S2 ep15, where Musa is being introduced as a girl from an ordinary family (and her mother was passed away). This is a might-be-an-intended-continuity-conflict made by the original production company Rainbow S.p.A.. Anyway, will you still believe "Musa is a Princess"? -- JSH-alive talk • cont • mail 13:36, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  You haven't watched seasons 1 and 2, in both original and 4Kids version, right? 

message: The title of the second film or we could say movie is winx club in a magical adventure.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.108.31.215 (talk) 17:58, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second film 

message: I was scrolling through the article to check if any new info was added and I saw this:
"Pixies The Pixie Teens are the Older, taller, and more magical forms of the mini pixies
Darla: The Pixie of Crafts. She is an exquisite crafter and artist born on Planet Craftia. Among her friends,she is the most daring and adventurous. During the series, she is an ultimate enemy of Darcy. And she has been an enemy of Flo Fireheart, on count Flo makes fun of Darla. Once in the series, they battle on earth. 
Carissa: The Pixie of Love. She is a similar female form of Cupid born on planet Romance. Among her buddies, she is the most dramatic and unbelieveable. She is an enemy of Stormy. And she is a fashionista. 
Marisol: Pixie of Weather. She is the sweetest among her BFF's. Born on planet Wisteria. She is claimed to be an ultimate enemy of stormy and Marisol often argues with Carissa. 
Julie: Pixie of Myths. She is the smartest among the group from Planet Mythologica. Julie is a big-hearted friend. She is often creative and always has a way to keep the girls out of chaos and trouble. 
Amber: Pixie of Balance. She is the kindest and nicest member of the group. Her and Julie get along the best. She is very creative and loves yoga and being in a peaceful way. She is from planet Pyrro and is claimed to be a vegetarian."
Um? What is this? If this is Pop Pixie, then it belongs in a Pop Pixie article. But I've never seen these mentioned in Pop Pixie at all. I'm thinking someone used this as a chance to get their fanfic characters on Wikipedia maybe? But if these are real, can we get some proof?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.15.114.201 (talk) 22:33, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Has anyone looked at those pixie subsections? 

message: Bloom and her five best friends Stella, Flora, Tecna, Musa and Layla/Aisha, and is situated mainly in the Magical Dimension and on Earth. This sentence makes no gramatical sense. Since it is the first sentence of the second paragraph in the lead, it is essential it be written in clearly understood English. It reads as though some words have gone missing. What about the five friends? Why is one name written Layla/Aisha? Layla (later known as Aisha) is more easily understood. Also , and is not great structring either. Either have the and or the comma, not both. Please fix.  --Falcadore (talk) 01:10, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Aisha is the original name. She is known as Layla in two of the major dubs so you could note her name like: "Aisha (known as Layla in 4Kids dub)" at first mention. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:14, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Poor language in lead

message: Does it really belong here thought it got a source.mich (talk) 01:23, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Contrversy section

message: I just did some rather extensive copy edits on the article.  I've never heard of this show before, so it might be a good idea for someone to look over my work in case I messed up.  There were a few places where the run-on sentences were just so confusing that I had make a judgment call on what exactly they were trying to say.  There were also a couple cases of rather ambiguous use of pronouns; it wasn't obvious to whom they were referring.  I used context to try to solve the mystery, but I may have guessed wrong.  I think I fixed the worst of the grammar, spelling, and style errors, but it wouldn't hurt to contact the Guild of Copy Editors.  This article still needs more work. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:30, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy edits 

message: This actress is so unimportant to this article that she is not even mentioned in this article. I have removed the addition of :template:Ariana Grande when it has been added as there is absolutely no value with some random actress navbox for anyone reading this article. Before it is put back please give some real good reason why any reader of this article would find this of any value. As it stands it just adds detritus to the end of this article. Geraldo Perez (talk) 22:50, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ariana Grande navbox 

message: I removed the transformations section because I thought it was unnecessary, excessive in-universe info, but it was reverted because apparently it's "important". I don't see it this way at all (who cares about their outfits?), but I'm always a bit insecure about my edits, so I thought I'd bring this up on the talk page. Was I right to remove the whole section? WonderBuono! (talk) 03:21, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transformations 

message: So there's a non-notable band that might be named after the show. This is trivial unless and until the band is notable and independent reliable sources discuss the band's connection to the show.
By way of comparison, a friend of mine had a band in college named after a planet in a well-known scifi movie. That band does not belong in the article about the movie either. - SummerPhD (talk) 22:12, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indonesian girl band 

message: Where we can discuss its  inclusion into this article. Tutelary (talk) 15:09, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  , As long as the newspaper qualifies under reliable sources, then it can be included as a source. Just because something is not from an official source does not mean that the entire information can be void. However, you do have a point of credence, WP:DUE. Though also, would you revert your edit back? Don't WP:EDITWAR just because you feel the information is false. I thought you've gone the democratic way, and instead reverted my edit rather than continuing the discussion. Tutelary (talk) 15:23, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

text: WP:CS#Newspaper_articles and WP:IRS#News_organizations state that newspapers are to be considered as official sources. And since the creators of the show have not denied the information, in can be considered to be legitimate. DragonFire900 (talk) 15:26, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

text: , do you have a rebuttal for my argument? Newspapers are considered reliable sources. Unless you have a legitimate counterpoint, it will be reverted back as it was reliably sourced information. Tutelary (talk) 15:33, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

text: I do. You're arguing that newspapers are not reliable sources, but in this context, they are. Now, I am a reader and acknowledge the Wikipedia policy, No personal attacks. Nobody has stated anything derogatory about you, only argued about the content and Wikipedia policy. If you're talking about the possible Sockpuppet investigation, you are innocent until proven guilty and also, Wikipedia is not a bureocracy. Even if you are blocked, you can appeal and be unlocked. It's just that the activity of yours is extremely similar to another user, and aroused suspicion that you might BE that indiviudal. Tutelary (talk) 17:13, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

text: The newspaper is considered to be an official source because it clearly states that they received the information fromthe creators of the show. Many companies make official announcements on newspapers and so long as the companion does not explicitly state that the newspaper has published false information, it is assumed that the information is legitimate. No one hates you here, but you are using flawed logic and incorrect ideas as a reason to remove information, although the said information does not violate Wikipedia's policies, but you also threaten people, which is against the rules and you don't even make an effort to understand and take into account counterarguments. DragonFire900 (talk) 15:43, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: HoseofLove needs to read WP:SPOILERS.--Auric  talk 18:54, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Season 7 

message: It has been officially announced that a seventh season of Winx Club will be produced, slated for 2015. An official teaser summary of the season states that: "Each fairy will have an animal that has a special talent, necessary for the balance of the Magic Universe. The Winx will discover this, while facing two new dreadful villains and getting new transformations along their journey." 
The second reference here is hidden behind a paywall.
The article you have selected requires a WorldScreen.com premium subscription.
Become a Member Now!
Subscription is just $99 for one whole year.
—nyuszika7h (talk) 19:43, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference hidden behind paywall (Season 7) 

message: I have flagged the table at Winx Club#Cast and characters as being original research. Deciding on a season-by-season basis who is a main character and who the recurring or guest characters are seems to rely heavily on personal interpretation. Anyone have any sources? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:29, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Official site lists six main characters: HERE AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:10, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

text: Table has been removed. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:33, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Table at [[Winx Club#Cast and characters]] 

message: --110.20.234.69 (talk) 00:02, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Journal discussing impact of Winx Club 

message: A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :List of international Winx Club voice actors is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of international Winx Club voice actors until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 21:26, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomination of [[:List of international Winx Club voice actors]] for deletion 

message: Winx Club WOW: World of Winx is still showing on Netflix as Coming Spring 2016.  AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 14:14, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  World of Winx premiere 

message: Hi, my other question is "Why Liza Kaplan's article is redirect\contribut to Fox cast?". First we only had info about her voice career on fox! But later AngusWoof found a old page about her! And I know now that she is stopped bu fox! And works on and for philomel books! And but why she stopped!? Can anyone write a bio for her! Links\Refrence are mention it on her draft page!--Maxie1hoi (talk) 16:13, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Liza Kaplan 

message: Hello,
Anyone known why 4Kids don't mention it roles for the voice actors? But only names on the credits?! As for the vg they aren't mention it the names! Selfs from the voice actors not!--Maxie1hoi (talk) 21:13, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  4Kids credits 

message: I moved this section to the talk page as there isn't a proper Reception section to handle this, and it's a country-specific reception issue for a show that was broadcast there many years after the original version: AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 07:19, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy / Unbalanced reception statement 

message: Hi, anyone have a proof that Haven is Darcy, Saskia is Stormy en Eilrrn is Lockette? Only saw at pokemon winx wiki and imdb! But i don't trust thata show real proof--Maxie1hoi (talk) 14:32, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  proof Darcy Lockette Stormy 

message: Hi, why 4kids don't show the characters for the voice actors??? Very stupid is that!! Now we don't know who us Stella. If Caren don't saying Stella!--Maxie1hoi (talk) 18:56, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I've reorganized the 4Kids section so that it just lists those who are Lead Voices. It will be up to the other sources such as tweets, books, reviews to determine who voiced whom there. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 00:06, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  4kids 

message: * The early non-4Kids English version was actually produced by Cinélume in Montreal, Quebec, Canada, and commissioned by Rainbow S.p.A., not RAI Radiotelevisione italiana as some believe. I'm going to fix that part some day.
* I recently learned that French magical girl series LoliRock was actually written and dubbed first in English, so that got me thinking. What was the actual original language of Winx Club? I noticed that, in a scene from season 1, Tecna's lips read "What?" rather than "" in Italian.
* P.S.: Does anyone know the reason behind the Layla/Aisha name change? (Not the changes made by Nickelodeon, but the other occured earlier.)
JSH-alive/talk/cont/mail 17:46, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Language 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Winx Club. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151208061923/http://www.dvdverdict.com/reviews/winxclub1.php to http://www.dvdverdict.com/reviews/winxclub1.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:57, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This series does not use star and recurring / guest star billing for their voice actors or characters so having one would be original research and not helpful. Please do not insert such a table in this article or the characters list. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 21:40, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do not add characters table 

message: I've been WP:BOLD and removed two repetitive sections that go against the Manual of Style. Before my edit, there were two sections of intricate detail that did not belong on the main article. First, "Plot" listed paragraphs of individual seasons' plots, which belong on the separate season pages and not this one. According to Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Television#Plot section, the plot given on the main article should only "summarize the core storyline," which a section ("Premise") already does. Second, there was a very long IMDb-style list of unoriginal voice actors on the main article for the dubs (only English, no other dubs). The section under "Development" about the cast seems to cover the notable voice actors of the show without turning into a list of dub voices, which if at all, should go on the List of Winx Club characters page under their roles. Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Television#Cast and characters information says that cast sections need to be written "without simply re-iterating entertainment websites such as IMDb," which is exactly what the dub voice list was. Hammill Ten (talk) 22:51, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The cast info can be moved to the individual seasons. The notable English dubs are credited as lists of voice actors. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:22, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure how we could do that without just using an IMDb-style list of voices from select dubs. Choosing the English dubs from external companies (which aren't any more notable than non-English ones) violates WP:WEIGHT by prioritizing info that's only relevant to English speakers, and it creates an unsubstantiated leaning toward the countries that used these dubs. Briefly describing the two original casts (that the animation was lined up to) on the main article follows MOSTV, but listing select dub voices doesn't. For this case where there are quite a few different dubs (season 3 would list four different casts, if I'm not mistaken), we should definitely avoid listing them. (This kind of info is for IMDb and the Winx Club Wiki, so I can see why MOSTV prevents reiterating these kinds of lists.) Hammill Ten (talk) 21:37, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Season & cast info 

message: The eighth season is not a reboot. If it was, the continuity from the previous seven seasons would be ignored. The cited source doesn't even say anything about a reboot, only that the series was targeting a younger audience and that the Netflix series would cater to older fans.MarcoPolo250 (talk) 11:27, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I mean, I think this comes down to different translations/interpretations of the word reboot, since the season definitely fits in with that definition of significantly changing up the graphics, show team, and writing. But I do see your point that we shouldn’t use that word, so I removed it. Even though the continuity was not really kept anyway. 2600:1000:B049:46E0:C7D:77B4:AD0:BF8D (talk) 12:05, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: There are no different interpretations. A reboot means the previous continuity has been discarded. Non-canon. It never happened. In other words, season 8 would have been set in a different timeline where the events of the previous 7 seasons never happened. That Valtor makes an appearance and the series acknowledges that this is his return from season 2, rather than treat it as if this is first time he's fighting the Winx, means the preceding continuity still stands and season 8 is set within that continuity. 
A retool just means the production is being revamped in a way that doesn't affect show in-universe. MarcoPolo250 (talk) 22:47, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Season 8 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bloom (winx club charector). Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 13:07, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Bloom (winx club charector)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: Restored information on the show's original broadcast via 4Kids Entertainment and 4Kids TV. Nickelodeon wouldn't begin co-producing the series until season 5, and even then, Viacom (2005–2019) wouldn't acquire 30% of Rainbow until 2011. MarcoPolo250 (talk) 00:26, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The original broadcast was the Italian broadcast, on Rai 2. Later, original episodes were produced/written by Viacom in America, so the American broadcasts of those episodes only is relevant to this page. The older dubbing of 4Kids is not original, it just dubbed over the Italian version without their involvement, so the 4Kids broadcasts should stay part of the list of third-party foreign dubbers (aka ones who weren't part of the show production), because 4Kids was just one of the many unconnected dubbing companies who didn’t produce the show. We do not talk about the German dub airings in detail, for this reason, since those dubbers are not the original producers. 2600:1000:B070:3B25:1074:1C16:1251:E2EF (talk) 01:14, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: No, I disagree. You make it seem like 4Kids' version is illegal or something. 4Kids had permission to make an official dub for the American market as Nickelodeon did, regardless if the Italian people were involved or not. To only still acknowledge Nickelodeon's dub because of their partnership ties with Italy is dumb. The 4Kids dub is a wide-known dub and to remove their involvement with the show from this page makes it seem like they took no part in dubbing it at all especially when the initial American dub airings are from when 4Kids had it, so them being the producers of the AMERICAN version, prior to Nickelodeon, ought to still be acknowledged. America is big market for any sort of dub, so whatever company should get credit for dubbing the show especially if the version was widely recognize. Germany is a small country and their dub wasn't widely recognize outside of their country as 4Kids' dub was for the American market initially, which is why not much attention is given to it and it's own air dates and casting. But to act like the show was only English dubbed and popularized by Canada and then Nickelodeon later on is misleading and wrong when you have a whole era of 4Kids' work and involvement to be added to that ordeal. - DevonteHuntley (talk) 20:07, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  4Kids dub was first 

message: if you see that the end date says present just know that is unsourced not only is that unsourced but if you go on edit source you can see next to the present it says yes so that person just wants winx club to be on in the present day now i dont know how to report but if you could tell me how to report that person that would be great  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kingkobra775 (talk • contribs) 16:55, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  winx club ended on September 17, 2019  

message: This features the same image that was on Wikia. Is this enough to prove that the image is real and not fan-made? https://www.winxcluball.com/2020/09/rainbow-srl-confirms-winx-club-season-9.html?m=179.100.210.106 (talk) 05:31, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems to be a fan-run site, which is WP:NOTRS and would fall under WP:USERG. Magitroopa (talk) 06:51, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: That site clarified their source as the Russian Licensing Summit Online though and Wikia also said the information is from the Licensing Summit.79.100.210.106 (talk) 11:58, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

text: Hmm, that source talks about a season in development called Winx Club Shorts as a working title, I don't know if that means it's part of the original show or if it's going to be something new. We should probably wait until a clear announcement TheFallenPower (talk) 21:48, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It contains the words "nona stagione" though, which Google translates to ninth season.109.160.111.223 (talk) 22:57, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It doesn't say a ninth season has been made. Peter James (talk) 09:44, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It says a ninth season is currently in development.79.100.210.106 (talk) 12:14, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Does "in development" mean that it has already been made, or that a date has been announced? Peter James (talk) 13:16, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it means they have started writing the script, but have not finished it yet. As for a date, it was announced on the Russian Licensing Summit Online last year that the season will premiere either in 2021 or 2022.79.100.210.106 (talk) 13:24, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Source for Season 9

message: Thecleanerand, please stop edit warring without getting consensus for your deletions... Also, please read the note: "This section is for the original casts, not for dubs. Seasons 1-4 were animated to match the Italian voices, while 5-6 and the specials were done to match the Hollywood voices. Any third-party dubs, including 4Kids, are not original and do not belong in this section." There were other dubs that "created their own localized version of the show" too, like the German dub that had a completely new opening song and edits, but these are not the original casts. The original was just the Italian version for 2004-2009, then after the show became Italian-American, the page can start to mention that American information. TheFallenPower (talk) 15:27, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: All third-party dubs/localizations (doesn't matter what) aren't the original version of the show and don't need more than a brief mention. Please don't keep edit-warring to add more, which violates WP:WEIGHT by focusing on only one non-original version and not any of the others. The original was just the Italian version for 2004-2009, then after the show became Italian-American, the page can start to mention that American information. TheFallenPower (talk) 21:05, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Deleting content

message: Hello. Why voice actor section is deleted a long time ago? NiesNi (talk) 19:21, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The main voices (the original ones that the animation has been matched to, which were the Italian ones and the Hollywood English ones) are covered in Cast section. And they’re listed on the Characters article too. However, turning the cast paragraphs into a long list of dub voices would not be helpful since it would just be a lot of fancruft. TheFallenPower (talk) 14:51, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Voice actors 

message: Since it is now clearly said to be a reboot series as the sneak peek calls it a brand new series rather than Season 9 (Season 9 is what it was originally said to be back when it was first announced in late 2020. They later said it is a reboot in late 2021 and have been calling it a reboot since but at the time it wasn't 100% clear that it was really a reboot series and not just another soft reboot), shouldn't we make a separate Winx Club (2025 TV series) page?91.92.103.87 (talk) 09:57, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Reboot