lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Optimus Comunicações

message: hello,
           i have nokia n5000 given to me by friend and bought in portugal but could not use it here  
       
       in the philippines becoz its lock under optimus, can u please give me the unlock codes? the   
       
       phones imei nos. are 354838/02/409144/4
       thanks and regards  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.54.2.13 (talk) 05:40, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  unlock codes for nokia n5000 model
Talk:Mound City, Kansas

message: If you would like to edit this article, please review the following to get a better idea of what to include:
# All city articles MUST follow this guideline for layout and content: Wikipedia:USCITY
# Please examine these city examples: Lock Haven, Pennsylvania; Stephens City, Virginia; Kent, Ohio; Tulsa, Oklahoma; Grand Forks, North Dakota.
# Please do NOT add text that sounds like a realtor advertisement, but instead write like a neutral-party encyclopedia.
# Please read the  editing tutorial and  new contributor help page before editing the first time. 
# How to cite sources by adding references? Add references or someone may delete your text.
# What is Verifiability?
Sbmeirow (talk) 17:11, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important Notes Before Editing This Article 
Talk:Catherine Fox

message: I have some questions about the number of Golds she won at the 1996 Olympics. According to some sources, it was two, as a member of two relay teams (4x1 Free and 4x1 Medley). However, on the Wikipedia Olympic page, it says that she was only part of the 4x1 freestyle team. Anyone have a clarification? Flibbert 17:49, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Problem solved. There are 8 racers per medley team. Catherine was on the gold medal team, but in a prelim heat team, but not in the final race, which is what wikipedia reports. Thanks to Andrwsc for his rapid response and knowledge. Flibbert 02:34, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Number of Gold Medals
Talk:Blue Mound, Kansas

message: Please review the following to get a better idea of what you should add to this article:
# Please follow the Wikipedia USCITY guideline for layout and content.
# Please examine these great articles for ideas: Lock Haven, Pennsylvania / Stephens City, Virginia / Kent, Ohio / Tulsa, Oklahoma / Grand Forks, North Dakota.
# Please ensure a person meets Wikipedia Notability requirements before adding to the "Notable People" section.
Please review the following before editing:
# Please document your source by citing a reference to prove your text is verifiable.
# Please add text that has a neutral point of view instead of sounding like an advertisement.
# Please read the "Editing, Creating, and Maintaining Articles" chapter from the book Wikipedia : The Missing Manual, .
Sbmeirow (talk) 20:12, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important Notes Before Editing This Article 
Talk:Child carrier

message: The entry for "baby sling" contains comprehensive information about different types of carriers. It would seem logical to remove that information from "baby sling" and bring it over to this entry on "child carrier" and even consider renaming this entry "baby carrier" as that seems to be a more common term.
"Baby sling" is a type of child carrier, most commonly one with fabric and rings, but it can also be tied. But there are many different carriers described in that article, including historical carriers and carriers used in different cultures. Those paragraphs would seem to fit "child carrier" better, along with new material that would include modern frontpack and backpack carriers.
More research would need to be done to fill in the gaps left in the "baby sling" entry. For example, what constitutes a sling? Is it a carrier that would only be worn over one shoulder like a sash? Would a hiking carrier that uses buckles or clips to secure the child to the wearer fit in the sling category or the "child carrier" category? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.223.131.86 (talk • contribs) 12:54, April 2, 2007
The History on this section needs verification. I removed the sentence that says that the modern pouch carrier was invented in Hawaii. That is clearly a spam reference to the Ergo. The first modern pouch carrier in the United States was probably the Snugli in the early 70's.  There are a number of "modern" pouch carriers like the Ergo that were invented other places than Hawaii. Generally, there is a dire need for references here.  I also believe that Child Carriers is a better broad category and that Baby Slings is a type of child carrier.  Both articles should be combined. Cdmmd2326 (talk) 16:25, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Frontenac, Kansas

message: Please review the following:
# Please follow the Wikipedia USCITY guideline for layout and content.
# Please document your source by citing a reference to prove your text is verifiable.
# Please add text that has a neutral point of view instead of sounding like an advertisement.
# Please ensure a person meets Wikipedia Notability requirements before adding to the "Notable People" section.
# Please read the "Editing, Creating, and Maintaining Articles" chapter from the book Wikipedia : The Missing Manual, .
• Sbmeirow • Talk •  01:29, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important Tips Before Editing This Article 

message: The fictional town of Merinac in K. J. DellÁntonia's 2020 novel The Chicken Sisters is a reference to Frontenac, but I don't have a reliable source that says this. Kdammers (talk) 04:09, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chicken Sisters
Talk:Arma, Kansas

message: # Please read  editing tutorial and  new contributor help page before editing the first time. This  cheatsheet is useful.
# Please add  inline citations, enclosed in "ref" tags, to ensure your new text is  verifiable.
# Please read  content guidelines for US city articles.
: Sbmeirow (talk) 02:49, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important Notes Before Editing The Article 
Talk:Cherokee, Kansas

message: # Please read  editing tutorial and  new contributor help page before editing the first time. This  cheatsheet is useful.
# Please add  inline citations, enclosed in "ref" tags, to ensure your new text is  verifiable.
# Please read  content guidelines for US city articles.
: Sbmeirow (talk) 02:49, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important Notes Before Editing The Article 
Talk:Mulberry, Kansas

message: # Please read  editing tutorial and  new contributor help page before editing the first time. This  cheatsheet is useful.
# Please add  inline citations, enclosed in "ref" tags, to ensure your new text is  verifiable.
# Please read  content guidelines for US city articles.
: Sbmeirow (talk) 02:49, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important Notes Before Editing The Article 

message: "Kansas town claims BP gouged on gas in Feb. freeze" - The Wichita Eagle - April 4, 2021
https://www.kansas.com/news/business/article250393286.html
• Sbmeirow • Talk • 20:25, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  News
Talk:Arcadia, Kansas

message: # Please read  editing tutorial and  new contributor help page before editing the first time. This  cheatsheet is useful.
# Please add  inline citations, enclosed in "ref" tags, to ensure your new text is  verifiable.
# Please read  content guidelines for US city articles.
: Sbmeirow (talk) 02:49, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important Notes Before Editing The Article 
Talk:Walnut, Kansas

message: # Please read  editing tutorial and  new contributor help page before editing the first time. This  cheatsheet is useful.
# Please add  inline citations, enclosed in "ref" tags, to ensure your new text is  verifiable.
# Please read  content guidelines for US city articles.
: Sbmeirow (talk) 02:49, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important Notes Before Editing The Article 
Talk:Hepler, Kansas

message: # Please read  editing tutorial and  new contributor help page before editing the first time. This  cheatsheet is useful.
# Please add  inline citations, enclosed in "ref" tags, to ensure your new text is  verifiable.
# Please read  content guidelines for US city articles.
: Sbmeirow (talk) 02:49, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important Notes Before Editing The Article 
Talk:Riverton, Kansas

message: : "Famous Eisler Brothers Country Store in Riverton, mentioned in the credits for the movie Cars."
Um, there's a reason why this place was mentioned in Cars (film)... that's where John Lasseter and Joe Ranft of Pixar met Dean Walker of the Kansas Route 66 association, who told them about the Ghostlight and showed them how he could twist his feet around to walk backward. Of course, the corresponding 'Cars' character would drive backward... because he's a truck. Mater (Cars), anyone? One of multiple influences for the character (the truck itself is at the Kan-O-Tex Service Station just down the road in Galena, Kansas) and the background is already cited and sourced in Mater's article here if y'all reckon it worth a mention? 2001:5C0:1000:A:0:0:0:831 (talk) 02:40, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eisler Brothers and 'Cars (film)'
Talk:The 4-Dimensional Nightmare

message: I think that notability is more or less covered - in the ISFDb there are listings for various reviews. Granted I know that the site is user submitted, but the amount gives off the reasonable impression that there is more coverage out there, just not on the internet. Until someone can dig those up and provide info, this is unlikely to go beyond start class, however. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:44, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Swimming at the 1996 Summer Olympics

message: According to some sources, Catherine Fox, who was on the gold medal 4x100 free team, was also on this medley team. Is this correct? Flibbert 18:04, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Our primary source for Olympic medalists is the IOC "medal database" (link here), and it currently shows eight medalists for the USA 4x100 medley relay team.  Presumably, this lists all women who competed in either the final or the heats, whereas the medal summary table on this Wikipedia page just shows the four who raced in the final.  Feel free to update this page to match the IOC source if you wish.  Andrwsc 18:17, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That answers my question perfectly. Thanks for your rapid response and answer. Flibbert 02:30, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 4x100 Medley Women's Team

message: It looks like the results on all the subpages are missing the prelims times of the people who qualified to swim a second time. (The pages are divided into "Qualifiers" and "Non-Qualifiers", instead of Prelims/Finals.) So, in most races this means that 16 times are missing from each page (8 times for the longer races and relays). The times are in the source document that USA Swimming has. -- Hooperswim (talk) 02:45, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prelims results are missing those who finaled...
Talk:Weir, Kansas

message: Is it accurate to call a municipality of 780 residents a city?  What is the definition of "city" in Kansas? Ifdef (talk) 18:13, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: In Kansas, any municipality is called a city.  Therefore, it is accurate to call this municipality a city, even though it would be a village in Nebraska.  Nyttend (talk) 20:37, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  City? 
Talk:West Mineral, Kansas

message: Please review the following to get a better idea of what you should add to this article:
# Please follow the Wikipedia USCITY guideline for layout and content.
# Please examine these great articles for ideas: Lock Haven, Pennsylvania / Stephens City, Virginia / Kent, Ohio / Tulsa, Oklahoma / Grand Forks, North Dakota.
# Please ensure a person meets Wikipedia Notability requirements before adding to the "Notable People" section.
Please review the following before editing:
# Please document your source by citing a reference to prove your text is verifiable.
# Please add text that has a neutral point of view instead of sounding like an advertisement.
# Please read the "Editing, Creating, and Maintaining Articles" chapter from the book Wikipedia : The Missing Manual, .
Sbmeirow (talk) 09:03, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important Notes Before Editing This Article
Talk:Rienz

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The current name of the article, "Rienz-Rienza", is a combination of the German name ("Rienz") and the Italian name ("Rienza"). This type of bilingual naming was found to be undesirable in a survey at Talk:Communes of South Tyrol, see also Wikipedia:Naming conventions (geographic names)#Multiple local names. The three most plausible options are listed below, please cast your votes. Markussep 17:38, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that these English usage data are too limited to indicate a preference. Like for the municipalities, I would prefer taking the name in the local majority language name, which would be "Rienz". Markussep 07:36, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
This article has been renamed  as the result of a move request. --Stemonitis 11:47, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Move request

message: Add any additional comments
This is the census I referred to: . The Rienz flows through Toblach (86% German), Niederdorf, Italy (93%), Welsberg-Taisten (96%), Olang (97%), Bruneck (83%), St. Lorenzen (97%), Kiens (97%), Vintl (98%), Mühlbach, Italy (95%), Rodeneck (100%) and Brixen (73%). Some English use statistics: 
*Google Scholar:
**Rienz river 10
**Rienza river 19
*Google (only English language, .org, -wikipedia):
**Rienz river 34
**Rienza river 18 Markussep 18:09, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that these English usage data are too limited to indicate a preference. Like for the municipalities, I would prefer taking the name in the local majority language name, which would be "Rienz". Markussep 07:36, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.</div>
This article has been renamed  as the result of a move request. --Stemonitis 11:47, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Talk:The Last American Hero

message: Am I right in thinking that the version of the song used for the film isn’t the one which was released as the single? I’ve not seen the film in years, but I *think* it’s a slower take, with fewer strings etc. I only ask because I think it was down to the film usage that he was persuaded to go back into the studio and redo a tune which, according to his wife, he had be reluctant to record in the first place.Jock123 (talk) 17:37, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jim Croce “I Got a Name”
Talk:List of alumni of the Second City

message: Does List of Second City Chicago alumni duplicate the first section, or is that article only comedians, whereas this includes others?
Should  or See also be added, or should they be merged? 
Mark Hurd (talk) 12:45, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The two lists don't seem to have any distinct inclusion criteria, so it's just duplication. There could be a case to be made that the Chicago company has the notability and volume needed to stand alone as an independent list, but we don't need both a standalone Chicago list and a Chicago section in this list — if the separate list is desired, then the Chicago section of this list should be pruned down to a  link to that one instead of directly listing people. But it's also worth noting that if Chicago qualifies for a separate standalone list, then Toronto absolutely does too — but with just 14 people listed under the Detroit, Las Vegas and Cleveland sections combined, this list loses its reason for being if Chicago and Toronto are spun out, so I don't believe we really need the separate Chicago list either. Accordingly I've tagged them for a proposed merger. Bearcat (talk) 20:13, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does List of Second City Chicago alumni duplicate the first section?
Talk:Profile

message: but what you see here is the extent of my knowledge on using wikipedia.......and my grammar and spelling is awful  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.129.197.190 (talk) 10:42, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: I could make one

message: Looking up profile in any decent dictionary revels the following meanings:
profile/ˈprəʊfʌɪl/﻿
▶noun
    1 an outline of something, especially a face, as seen from one side. 
    2 a vertical cross section of something.
    ■ a flat outline piece of scenery on stage.
    3 a graphical or other representation of information recorded in quantified form.
    ■ a record of a person's psychological or behavioural characteristics, preferences, etc., so as to assess their capabilities or identify categories of people: they had been using personal details to build customer profiles.
    4 a short descriptive article about someone. 
    5 the extent to which a person or organization attracts public notice.
▶verb
    1 describe in a short article. 
    2 (be profiled) appear in outline. 
    3 shape by means of a tool guided by a template.
This page just describes some special and computer related definitions. This page is a good example of the limitations with wikipedia.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.155.192.205 (talk) 12:30, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nerds page 

message: There is a Radio Four programme called "Profile" which gives biographical sketches of names in the news. This could be included on this page in Wikipedia. Vorbee (talk) 16:52, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Radio Four programme

message: The word DAMESELLE, I found meaning like AN UNMARRIED BEAUTIFUL GIRL also known as NIMPH.it is the word which haven't found in Google search! What you say?  Pooja Shah (talk) 16:03, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dameselle
Template talk:Student unionism in Australia

message: This template lists a lot of non-notable groups. Has there been any discussion anywhere about whether or not these groups are notable enough to even have Wikipedia articles? --Elonka 18:29, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: My recommendation is that the redlinks be removed from the template, and that some sort of "List of" link be added, to cover a paragraph on each of the groups that aren't notable enough for their own article. --Elonka 17:05, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  One article covering all factions would probably be the best option. I'd hate to see the info removed, even if its notability is suspect. Joestella 08:39, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability concerns
Category talk:Start-Class visual arts articles

message: My name is Bruce Sutherland, and I put in the data in the "notes" section as well as the data in end note 9. This is a self-serving comment, but I see nothing wrong with what I have done. If I did not do it, who would? The article in Source: Notes in the History of Art, is about 2,000 words long and discusses two of Grimani's cameos, not just the cameo Augustus but also a cameo of Philoctetes. These two cameos were both owned by Cardinal Domenico Grimani and seem to have inspired several figures on the Sistine ceiling. The cameo Augustus seems to have inspired the ignudo to the upper right of the Erythraean sibyl. The editor of Burlington refused to publish because I could not prove the similarities between the cameos and the figures by Michelangelo were not just coincidental. I still cannot. An editor of a Swiss journal said what I was saying was not a "testable hypothesis". True, but art history is not an exact science as chemistry is. Perhaps the world's leading authority on ancient Greco-Roman cameos is Sir Professor John Boardman, and he agrees with my article. Your comments, please...Bsutherlandb (talk) 02:49, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Martin County High School

message: I think that Vice Principal: Mr. Jack "Three Balls" Valerio and Vice Principal: Mrs. Virginia Skinner rawr has unneeded comments in them, "Three Balls" and "rawr" respectively. I believe they should be removed. I've personally never heard Mr. Valerio called that in my fours years here and in the second rawr is completely out of place. I'm going to change it but if I'm somehow wrong, go ahead and change it back, I'm kinda new to this stuff. AlexWolfx (talk) 14:39, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unneeded comments in the Administration section 
Talk:The Sartorialist

message: To address the reversion by Pikks...  Yes, Scott Schuman is a photographer, and he has his own article where the photographer category belongs.  This, however, is an article on his website.  Websites are not photographers.  This is a pretty simple issue.   Mbinebri  talk ← 17:30, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Right, I agree. Thanks for writing here. I didn't consider this particular. I mean... if it was a biography article and did not have separate articles for site and for the person it could go there. But in this case this category can be removed. --★ Pikks ★ MsG   17:33, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I just added the category to his article (with a couple other edits), so problem solved.   Mbinebri  talk ← 17:38, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categorization
Talk:David Ball (bishop)

message: How do I fix the external reference to footnotes list? Bearian 18:45, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I am removing statements that are unsourced, and which I am not sure can be sourced, e.g., how conserative or moderate he was. Bearian 13:38, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I am not sure that the source for the statement on Ball's opinion on same-sex unions is properly sourced, i.e., it is from Integrity, the LGBT group within the ECUSA, which is (properly) biased (I am a member).  Should I remove that statement and sourcing as POV?  Also, is the page close to being Wikified now? Bearian 14:11, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Legacy

message: I think there is a kind of "legacy" that refers to an amount of money of some sort. This type of legacy is not included here and needs to be added.
:Sounds like the only entry under "LAW": Legacy, a gift given to someone after death through a :Will (law). --Orange Mike 21:29, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legacy as money 

message: Can't Legacy also be used like descendant? Or am I confusing ti with something else?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.147.16.141 (talk) 23:56, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other possible meaning 

message: What is a legacy is planting seeds in a garden you’ll never get to see 109.240.31.202 (talk) 12:56, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legacy
Talk:Shipley, Oregon

message: Oregon Geographic Names doesn't mention Shipley, just Shipley Bridge and Shipley Creek. Unless you can find another source, I would hesitate to call it a defunct city, since it seems the place never merited a post office. Katr67 04:52, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ya, I wasn't sure what to call it. It's on the maps, Portland State has it in there geographic names database, but people live there and looking at the map it looks like it is part of Sheridan. Maybe unicorporated community? Aboutmovies 05:24, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, that's what I'd call it. I don't think we really want to go there with "Localities in Oregon"... Katr67 05:31, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Defunct city?
Talk:Ryan St. Anne Scott/Statement

message: This email has been sent to the Wikipedia Support Team (OTRS). In https://secure.wikimedia.org/otrs/index.pl?Action=AgentTicketZoom&TicketID=805558&ArticleID=1002468#1002468
the author has given his permission to post his email on a public talk page in order for editors to have a look at it. --Mbimmler 18:57, 2 April 2007 (UTC)