Talk:Defenders (comics)

message: Article referenced makes no mention of Grant Morrison.  Citation needed or remove claim.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Michaelpremsrirat (talk • contribs) 18:05, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grant Morrison? 

message: Is there any way we can clean up the external links list? Most of them go to the same site.
Giant89 02:56, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean up external links 

message: The article states, "Several of these seemingly-deceased members later returned as the mystical Dragon Circle. This team only appeared once, in issues #3-4 of the relaunched Doctor Strange, Sorcerer Supreme series."
I think this is false.  If I recall, this lineup (Valkyrie, Interloper, Manslaughter, Andromeda) appeared in a storyline in Marvel Comics Presents (and possibly elsewhere), and may have even gone by the name "Defenders" (Cf. Marvel Comics Presents #37).  Could this be stated in another way that clarifies exactly the presence of this lineup? KSchutte 15:58, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unconfirmed claim

message: Something should be said about the cult status the series received after Gerber was the writer. As a series, it had profound influence of the British writers and the whole Vertigo line. --Leocomix 13:36, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importance 

message: :Image:Defenders 34.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 06:51, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Defenders 34.jpg

message: :Image:ULTMTSV2006 COV.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 15:15, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:ULTMTSV2006 COV.jpg

message: :Image:Defenders 34.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 21:28, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Defenders 34.jpg

message: This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject.  If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class.  The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject.  Comics-awb (talk) 16:18, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Comics B-Class Assesment required

message: why aren't they mentioned here??? 202.142.190.245 (talk) 09:26, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably because the story is rather new such that not all details are available. Spshu (talk) 16:43, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  the new "mark millar: Fantastic four" defenders? 

message: I sorry but you, Brian Boru is awesome, continually mix up the different organizations of Defenders teams in the Defenders article.  Either you have one infobox with each field with a subfield ie. --  First appearance  Non-team: Marvel Feature #1 (December 1971)  Team: Defenders 125  Initiative:  Last Defenders 1, etc. or have one infobox for each Defenders team.  This avoids the mashup of incongruent information with the first appearance of the original non-team with current membership of the Initiative founded team.  To have it all mashup will confuse readers.  Spshu (talk) 21:55, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Seperate organization

message: Someone needs to get  and  to come to an agreement regarding these team infoboxes they keep adding and then deleting... -- Stoshmaster (talk) 23:57, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I indicated the reason for the multiple infoboxes on  talk page and indicated a compromise.  He did not respond and has reverted the mult. infoboxes into the mashup single infobox, which is confusing.  I reverted and posted a request at an administrator's talk page to step in. Spshu (talk) 19:00, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

text: I have to say that 5 infoboxes seems excessive when some of the teams only merit a couple of paragraphs, which means the boxes "stack" pushing the Initiative one much further down that page away from the actual section it refers to. The boxes only contain the first issue they appeared in and a link to the membership and they aren't adding much to the page. It might be that using "noimage" could kill the height issue but I wonder how wise it is to have so many infoboxes in such a small space. (Emperor (talk) 14:03, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I used the noimage tag in the infoboxes and add more detail.  If this still is too much, I will go with the intergrated single infobox. Spshu (talk) 16:41, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mediation required? 

message: There is currently a claim that Wolverine, Spider-Man and Iron Fist were all ex-Defenders.  I believe none of them were (Luke Cage, however, did participate in a few of the early Nighthawk stories). Sources would be welcome. Luis Dantas (talk) 11:53, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Under "Legacy"