lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Determinate cultivar

message: "Tomatoes" doesn't feel like a title that fully describes the subsection in this article. I think that a new title should be considered or that the subsection be instead incorporated into the main body. 
The mention of heirloom tomatoes in the last sentence seems a little out of place. I think that maybe this fact should try to be worked into a sentence earlier in the paragraph. WikidKev (talk) 08:26, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subtitle
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Charlotte

message: I have made some updates to the Wikipedia:WikiProject North Carolina page that might be of interest to the WikiProject Charlotte members.  Let me know if there is anything that could be done better.  Feel free to use any of the tools or templates on the WikiProject Charlotte Page.
  12:13, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProjet North Carolina

message: I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like
*John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.)
and turns it into something like
* John Smith "" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.
It will work on a variety of links, including those from ,  and .
The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.
Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.
-  Headbomb {t · c · p · b}
This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  User script to detect unreliable sources
Talk:Peckforton

message: The grade system bears little or no information for the casual reader and asumes a bit too much knowlegde on the part of the reader. Maybe a explanatory paragraph or exchange of the grade system information to general terms. "international importance" "special national importance" "national interest" types of comments?
195.84.66.130 (talk) 12:17, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I fear it would become very unwieldy to add explanations of what national heritage grading systems mean to all the many thousands of articles that mention them. The terms are linked on first use to Listed building which explains the UK system in detail. Perhaps another wikilink could be introduced, as I note reorganisation of the "Other landmarks" section to put the elephant & castle item first has moved the link away from the start of the section. Espresso Addict (talk) 18:41, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Li hing mui

message: Where do the Chinese characters 旅行梅 come from? They are not even pronounced "li hing mui." This Chinese page suggests 李兴梅, which at least has a similar pronunciation in Cantonese.
I'm not sure either of them, or indeed "Li hing mui," are good to describe the product. It is not even mentioned in the Chinese version of this page. The common Chinese name for this Chinese food is "huamei," 話梅, and logically that should be the title of this page. Mlewan (talk) 09:31, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Some reliable sources give the "travelling plum" definition https://www.latimes.com/travel/la-tr-hawaiis-li-hing-everything-20171015-htmlstory.html but it is provided in passing so there may have been circular sourcing from the Wikipedia page itself.--Leugen9001 (talk) 23:10, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

text: Whatever Li Hing is in Chinese, it is a) not the name of this plum in Chinese and b) does not correspond to the romanization if it is truly "travelling plum."  I believe this name might only be used in Hawaii. I concur that the title of this page should be Hua mei or Wah mui, as this would agree with the naming in the rest of the world. The edits of this page point to most of the Hawaiian influence stemming from one school in Honolulu assigning Wikipedia editing to a class, which may be why it is biased towards Hawaii (despite being a broadly Chinese diaspora food). AnsonTG (talk) 22:57, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  旅行梅 or 李兴梅 or 話梅 

message: Turtlejulia (talk) 03:39, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestions 

message: Section is unreferenced and needs to be rewritten- low quality writing. 2603:7000:6E3F:F0B5:8800:D687:2C9B:93BC (talk) 20:49, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alcoholic Beverage section 

message: Please stop ruining the first paragraphs of every damn article by putting tons of shit in brackets between words until the actual sentence you’re supposed to read becomes unreadable! … It’s bad enough that Wikipedia generally goes out of its way to talk about everything BUT the most essential part of actually saying what the thing actually is. … Together with the inserted gibberish, it becomes unbearable! — 2A0A:A546:FE76:1:7634:A54A:79A9:F2EA (talk) 18:58, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unreadable first paragraph
Talk:Aggie Bonfire leadership

message: Why the heck is this being proposed for deletion. It is part of A&M History and will be linked from at least the Aggie Bonfire page and the Corps of Cadets page. There is nothing WP:WALL pertains to in this context and it will be expanded upon, but probably not right now. It is ridiculous to delete something that has existed for mere hours. Give it a chance to be expanded & referenced. — BQZip01 — talk 21:45, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed deletion

message: ...of Aggie Bonfire and covers details not included in the main article. The information contained here is not on the Aggie Bonfire page. — BQZip01 — talk 23:08, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: This article is a subpage
Talk:Augmented triad

message: One audio file added. Hyacinth (talk) 22:27, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reqaudio

message: Since it's infobox says "Augmented triad" and while it mentions the Augmented sixth chord it does not cover any other chords. Hyacinth (talk) 06:35, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge: Augmented chord

message: I have removed the enharmonic equivalents from the Augmented triad chord table. I think it's unwise to imply that C sharp to F is a major third. The people who are least likely to be misled will definitely not need to be told that E sharp is the same note as F. Rigaudon (talk) 22:39, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Enharmonic equivalents 

message: Stevie Wonder brought the augmented chord into the mainstream of soul music in his song "Don't You Worry About a Thing."  Previously in this genre it was used mainly in the form of a passing tone.Euonyman (talk) 21:41, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stevie Wonder 

message: The article seems to use the notations "aug" and superscript "+" without ever defining either.  I think it would be good to put in a sentence describing these notations.  I would do it if I had confidence in my knowledge of chord-naming conventions.  However I am for now left unsure about the correct notations and their meanings.  Thanks if you can clear that up.CountMacula (talk) 04:42, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notation:  "aug" and superscript "+" 

message: The "augmented" chords in Haydn's Op 54 No 2 trio are augmented sixth chords, not augmented triads. Haydn op. 74 no. 3 has a brief augmented triad in the second movement, measure 7, beat 3. There are probably better examples. 2001:B07:6462:1B8E:FCA8:ACD6:D8AA:61D (talk) 18:36, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Haydn Op. 54 No. 2--no augmented triad in the Trio
Talk:Minor major seventh chord

message: the page name should have a slash in it
If for no other reason than it is the big chord from Psycho!         (kidding)  Gingermint (talk) 05:06, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  name 

message: See discussion here. Hyacinth (talk) 06:51, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Template talk:Chords#James Bond chord|James Bond chord]]

message: I've seen chords being notated as '-Δ7'. Is that another way to notate a minor-major seventh, or is it notation for something else? --Raboof (talk) 14:20, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: See the article. Hyacinth (talk) 18:59, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notation 

message: Why, what, where, and how does this article need additional citations for verification? Hyacinth (talk) 18:38, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Tag removed. Hyacinth (talk) 12:34, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional citations

message: *"Us and Them" by Pink Floyd
*Stevie Wonder uses the minor major seventh chord often as a variation of the ii chord in songs such as "For Once in My Life" and "I Just Called to Say I Love You"
*end of the James Bond theme tune
*first movement of Tchaikovsky's Fifth Symphony.
I removed the above as uncited. Hyacinth (talk) 11:30, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed: Uncited

message: Couldn't this chord also be tuned to 26:31:39:49? I know that this is just an approximation of the chord from equal temperment, but would it still be considered accurate? 50.152.28.228 (talk) 02:11, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I've never seen 26:31:39 for a minor triad. I would suggest 10:12:15:19 as being more consonant. I don't know whether to add or replace. TreeNamedUser (talk) 01:31, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other tunings
Talk:Ninth

message: I have added audio examples to the article. Hyacinth (talk) 01:08, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested audio

message: Since both are stubs. Hyacinth (talk) 23:23, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Hyacinth (talk) 18:49, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge: [[major ninth|Major]] and [[minor ninth]] articles

message: Is this article frequently confused with the Ninth Ammendment to the US constitution?  I feel like that's awfully specific. Quantumelfmage (talk) 17:12, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ninth ammendment 

message: Why and where does this article need additional citations for verification? What references does it need and how should they be added? Hyacinth (talk) 21:17, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional citations: Major ninth and Minor ninth
Talk:Eleventh

message: Two audio examples added. Any more audio examples needed? Hyacinth (talk) 22:07, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reqested audio

message: The image above, created by User:Wahoofive, was removed. The edit summary implied it is not a, "playable example," which it is. As such I have re-added it. Hyacinth (talk) 04:22, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No longer necessary here due to eleventh chord. Hyacinth (talk) 10:02, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed images

message: As per the "suspended chord" page, there seems to be some confusion regarding the difference between suspended and dominant sonorities. Suspensions are purely horizontal events dealing with the motion of the suspended line, where dominant chords are a seperate harmonic (vertical) event. The two are mutually exclusive terms (a chord can have a suspension, but then that suspension is resolved - linearly!). If anybody has serious differences with me, let's discuss it. Otherwise the page will be edited.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.143.108.27 (talk) 13:17, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  dominant versus suspension 

message: Eleventh is an unreferenced stub. See structure of Ninth, etc. Hyacinth (talk) 03:37, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge: Eleventh chord
Talk:Great Vancouver Fire

message: I've rewritten this article for my uni assignment. I'm open to any feedback/changes/discussion you may have! Clemlivy aikensnaps (talk) 08:52, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Article rewrite

message: :I didn't strain myself on this one and just took info from the jubilee booklet. The map contradicts the text by pinpointing the starting point west of Cambie, not between Cambie and Main. I think the Regina Hotel, marked on the map, survived as well. More research needed. bobanny 01:38, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The Sḵwxwú7mesh did.  I need to find some more sources, but my people do talk about how when the  c city caught on fire, the indigenous at eslha7an (North Vancouver) came over in canoes and save a number of settlers from the fire.  Most people don't know this.  The newspaper back then did have pictures and an article about the canoes coming over.   I'll look but if anyone can point me in the director, thanks!  24.82.147.131 17:30, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's not hard to believe. Whatever boats were already on the Vancouver side would've been used as well. A source and any details would be awesome if you can find one. bobanny 22:56, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who Saved Them?
Talk:Borrowed chord

message: It seems to me that the fully diminished leading-tone seventh is not in the parallel minor (the natural minor, that is). 72.75.110.42 (talk) 12:32, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Not in the natural minor, but in the harmonic form of the minor scale. The same way that the dominant chord in a minor key is going to be major, according to the rules of Western classical music, because the seventh is raised in the harmonic minor scale. Rigaudon (talk) 16:41, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fully Diminished Leading-Tone Seventh 

message: This article needs some sources. There's no entry for borrowed chord in Grove. Does anyone have any ideas? Rigaudon (talk) 17:11, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Tag removed. Hyacinth (talk) 04:18, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: Why, where, how, and what needs additional citations in this article? Hyacinth (talk) 22:01, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Tag removed. Hyacinth (talk) 04:18, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional citations

message: Borrowed chords are also known as secondary dominants. (i.e. Piston: "Harmony" pg. 247)  --Mjl1966 (talk) 02:03, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't have Piston to hand, but in fact borrowed chords and secondary dominants are completely unrelated.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.186.169.170 (talk) 21:35, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Secondary dominants

message: One audio example, of a borrowed chord in the backdoor progression, added. Hyacinth (talk) 22:01, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Reqmusic

message: The present article:
* succinctly describes what happens, naming the main kinds of chords borrowed from related modes, and also
* gives a simple reason why we use borrowed chords (to add variety and colour).
This is a good start.
However, it only touches in passing on:
* the harmonic functions of the chords used (perhaps a deeper reason why); 
and the example added most recently (by User:Hyacinth) suggests:
* how tone leading interacts with the choice of borrowed chord.  
Has anybody any useful references about these last two points?  yoyo (talk) 17:21, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: What example are you talking about? You could probably get a good reference through ILL. Hyacinth (talk) 07:54, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Functional analysis
Talk:Muriel (film)

message: I'm taking suggestions. Should the title of this article be changed to "Muriel, ou le Temps d'un retour"? That is, to add the comma and capitalize Temps instead of Le, just like the French wiki. Or perhaps it should be in English? The current title is identical to IMDB's.
--Dedachan 18:42, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:Parallel key

message: The first part is fine.
The section on computing the key signature is totally irrelevant.
The section on parallel chord hard to understand and simply wrong. Two chords are parallel if they have the same internal intervals, e.g. C and G.
These sections should be removed.
Marius63 (talk) 13:42, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Corrections needed

message: Why, what, where, and how does this article need additional citations for verification? Hyacinth (talk) 08:48, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Tag removed. Hyacinth (talk) 03:51, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional citations/Ref improve

message: The current wording of this will be extremely confusing for any readers from the U.S. I think it needs to be very clear that is derived from Hugo Riemann. In the U.S., a parallel chord would be triads that share the same tonic but have a different mode (P in neo-Riemannian theory). — Devin.chaloux (chat) 03:33, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Why and where is this section confusing? How should it be cleaned up? Hyacinth (talk) 03:50, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parallel chord (Relative)
Talk:Interim legislature of Nepal

message: Pratinidhi sabha is/was lower house and not the legislature. If I knew how, I would fix it myself ... --72.151.18.22 19:24, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Military College Jhelum

message: Needs a new infobox, the basics are here, but it only deals with 3 houses. Will ask for the code to be changed, then update the box accordingly:
RWardy 19:25, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox 

message: #Adding house names
#Adding a list of honours 
#Programs that are available at the school
#Expaniding the history  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zararyounis7576 (talk • contribs) 20:42, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  I will start expanding this page.
Talk:Westover Plantation

message: I am trying to collect information on Westover. I have noticed that not only is the information on this page not cited, I can't find anything to support it (specifically the claim that William Byrd III built Westover). There is also much more information about Westover available on many other websites. I think this article could do very well for some help. Promontoriumispromontorium (talk) 02:22, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Original research

message: Title of Westover; Wm. and Mary Qrtly., Vol. 4, No. 3, 1896 -Location (talk) 18:51, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: For future reference

message: Can't you folks understand that?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.28.145.40 (talk) 04:53, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  It's about a house, not slavery
Talk:Hyangyak

message: * I put Korea as Stub because it has no sources, while Vietnam gets a C because it's relatively detailed for an obscure concept and well-sourced.
* Should these two things be on the same article under the term in Korean? Is there an English term that'd be more neutral? Want to be mindful of its international usage
toobigtokale (talk) 05:17, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  thoughts
Talk:Chorley, Alderley

message: #Article needs to be greatly expanded using Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements as a guide.
#Infobox to be added.  DDStretch  (talk) 19:31, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment Report 

message: As the borough of Macclesfield has ceased to exist, should this page be renamed (bearing in mind that there's another Chorley in the new authority of Cheshire East)? — Old Wittonian (talk) 09:49, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I would say so - a comparable case is Woodend, Egremont, Cumbria () and Woodend, Ulpha, Cumbria (), which are both in Copeland and are dabbed by the nearest town (or small village in the case of Ulpha!) I'd suggest possibly Chorley, Alderley Edge, Cheshire for this one (since they are apparently historically linked), and Chorley, Nantwich, Cheshire for the other. There may be other exceptions elsewhere in the country though. — sjorford++ 17:34, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:Cultural impact of QI

message: Can I enquire as to the reason for removing the petition sections from this article? Grizzlyqi 15:35, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Petitions 

message: As a longtime admirer of Stephen Fry and a fan of QI, I have to say that this article is touching.  But why does it exist?  Why can't the cultural impact of QI be covered in the article QI? --Tony Sidaway 19:15, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Inappropriate
Talk:Durham Stevens

message: The References section in this article does not meet the basic standards of Wikipedia, and appears to have been created by editors unfamiliar with how to do so. It needs to be Wikified and brought up to speed... Many of the "citations" appear, at first glance at least, to be indiscernible... Regards... Stevenmitchell (talk) 12:18, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  References Section Requires Revamping
Talk:Lafa

message: In Israel, shawarma and kabob can be ordered in a lafa as much as in a pita. What is it like in other cultures?
Also, is it worth mentioning lafa's similarities to a burrito?
Binba 19:40, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well not so much the burrito to be precise, but rather the tortilla that the burrito is made with ;-)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 145.116.231.234 (talk) 10:45, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

message: In Jerusalem (probably elsewhere in Israel too), it's also known as eshtanur (literally oven fire, I guess).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.138.134.217 (talk) 12:55, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  eshtanur
Talk:Content (media)

message: I copied and pasted from user sandbox to the main article. Gianni dejesus (talk) 22:07, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello I’m sandbox Aitch7 (talk) 04:16, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: title.
(that's how to fill out a message body with "title" btw - there's no need to write a message body if there's no need to elaborate on your message heading/title) 99.229.43.127 (talk) 17:06, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  is a specific individual movie or video game referred to as "content?" 

message: Neither of these articles is particularly well-focused or sourced, but it doesn't really seem necessary to me to distinguish between the two. What would be the difference -- without looking at the articles -- between "content (media)" and "media (communications)"? There was a very large amount of irrelevant content in this article, most of which was uncited (and which I removed); the rest was about Mass media regulation, which I moved to said article. I don't think it makes sense to have this sort of combinatorial subdivision (you could have Communication (media), Content (communications), Media (content) etc) for terms that, in the actual articles, are being more or less treated as synonyms. jp×g🗯️ 03:09, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Surely one of the dozen WikiProjects monitoring and responsible for this article will come to the rescue and actually write some content about this high-importance topic! wbm1058 (talk) 12:23, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I cannot see how a credible article could be created on this topic. The article should be deleted with the rationale WP:NOTDICT.TheLongTone (talk) 15:07, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I see no disagreement above, so I have restored the redirect. If it is undone again, then a more formal discussion could be initiated to get some closure.  Vanilla  Wizard  💙 04:07, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Media (communication)