Talk:California Institute of the Arts

message: :Image:Calarts logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 19:40, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Calarts logo.gif

message: I've taught at Cal Arts and the tuition there currently (20l0) is $34,830.  You could go to a California Community College for about $300 per semester by comparison and the education would be roughly equivalent.  Cal Arts doesn't require good grades to get in but neither do community colleges.  The idea of Cal Arts is basically sound--talent and creativity should be the primary focus  but unfortunately, as in all academic settings, petty bickering, clashing egos and academic back-stabbing are present so this dilutes the artistic process.  Potential students should be made aware that they are entering a political arena at Cal Arts and with its high cost of tuition, due consideration should be given as to whether it's the right school for them.  People are jockeying for position at Cal Arts and since there's no tenure the last time I checked, the faculty is concerned about holding on to their jobs, which aggravates the political situation.  Thought I'd give a heads up and hope this helps potential students make an informed choice.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.198.19.168 (talk) 23:42, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  High Tuition at Cal Arts 

message: Animation students are concerned about the high cost of tuition at Cal Arts, but typically a student might study there only a year and then get a job in the animation industry--Cal Arts is a door to work.  So be aware of this option as a stepping stone to work, especially if you already have a lot of talent.  An advantage of Cal Arts is that it has industry connections right there in downtown L.A. (after all, it was founded by Disney).    66.122.182.62 (talk) 20:50, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Animation School 

message: See Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not.  Wikipedia does not publish speculation or ramblings suitable for personal blogs.  Any objections before I take out the garbage?
--Coolcaesar (talk) 06:37, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced speculation re: Pixar University connection to CalArts 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on California Institute of the Arts. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20150116000718/http://www.calarts.edu/~alumni/reunion/Images/Current_Insert.pdf to http://www.calarts.edu/~alumni/reunion/Images/Current_Insert.pdf
*Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.vh1.com/artists/interview/1486965/05122004/sonic_youth.jhtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:58, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on California Institute of the Arts. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://fv.calarts.edu/main/moma.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:20, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following coordinate fixes are needed for
—27.109.115.253 (talk) 21:16, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: What? General Ization Talk    21:20, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Closing this, as the coordinates in the article appear to be correct. 27.109.115.253, if you think that there is an error here, you'll need to give a clear explanation of the problem. Deor (talk) 21:54, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on California Institute of the Arts. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041028150852/http://mag.awn.com/index.php?ltype=pageone&article_no=2235&page=3 to http://mag.awn.com/index.php?ltype=pageone&article_no=2235&page=3
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:05, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Apparently there has been some shooting threat, all I found on this was a Daily Dot article and some Youtude videos so this could a non-issue and even has the possibility of failing Wikipedia's notability standards.  If this proposal does not qualify for being added to the CalArts article, then by all means take this discussion post with a grain of salt.
*Daily Dot article
HussarZwei (talk) 03:22, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  CalArts shooting threat (I think) 

message: It looks badly formatted and probably doesn't need to exist when a bullet list does the trick anyway. The Verified Cactus 100% 17:26, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The entire section is unnecessary so I removed it.  ElKevbo (talk) 19:50, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's up with that chart at "Honorary degree recipients"? 

message: As a student at CalArts 1970-72, the history in this article is hilarious.  It doesn't even mention that in 1970 the new student body arrived and was immediately at odds with the hierarchical Corrigan-Blau regime.  Or the Herbert Marcuse dust up.  Or much other "history."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Conscientia (talk • contribs) 19:53, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  neat and scrubbed and corporate