lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ripoff Report

message: First of all, Ripoff Report used to claim that "you can write whatever you want because we are protected by the First Amendment": false. Then the narration became "We cannot and will not dissolve the First Amendment rights of our users based on a unilateral allegation that something in a report is false". False: any court, "based on a unilateral allegation", can carry out the checks requested. Nor is it guaranteed that "the affected party is informed of the request so he/she can take steps to protect their privacy". Moreover, the long "series of steps" described by Ripoff Report, such as "1. Post a notice as a rebuttal to each report" are just fluff and there is no legal obligation to follow Ripoff Report's "steps". In other words, using that page as a source is equivalent to advertising the website. --151.19.78.188 (talk) 09:49, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd have to agree that the disputed paragraph looks questionable. The only source cited is the website itself, making what appear to be self-serving claims as regard to the law. Content on such matters should be independently sourced. AndyTheGrump (talk) 11:01, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The article states that it is a claim, which I believe is notable when talking about the site. The actual legal argument is much more complex - indeed (from memory) the claim itself has been a point of argument in law. There is an issue with WP:SELFSOURCE perhaps. Shritwod (talk) 12:48, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd like to see a clear explanation as to why the paragraph is needed at all. Why is it necessary to involve ourselves in trying to summarise this particular content from the website? If this is significant, it needs to be demonstrated through secondary sourcing - in which case we can report what such secondary sources say about it. AndyTheGrump (talk) 15:03, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It ties in with the Legal actions section IMO. Not saying that it couldn't do with a rewrite though, but nonetheless I don't think it's valid to remove the section on the basis stated above. Shritwod (talk) 16:00, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The Legal Actions section, along with the rest of the article, suffers from similar sourcing problems: citing the website itself, along with primary-source court records, and at least one blog. The article probably needs rewriting from scratch, based almost exclusively on what appropriate secondary reliable sources have to say on the subject. AndyTheGrump (talk) 16:17, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

text: "it is a claim, which I believe is notable"Precisely because it is just a claim — one of the zillions of "claims" made in that website — and not a fact, it is completely useless in a section named "Reports and rebuttals", where a description of how their reports-rebuttals work is more than enough. There is no need to "clarify" (as the paragraph says) the legal loopholes that the website claims to exploit, simply because the "clarification" comes from an unreliable and biased legal source. --151.57.51.151 (talk) 10:48, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ripoff Report should not be a legal source for this article
Talk:Smith–Lemli–Opitz syndrome

message: See the uploaded image: :File:Smith‐Lemli‐Opitz syndrome phenotype.jpg, from this case report. Cheers from Yekaterinburg, Russia, --CopperKettle (talk) 11:57, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  I've uploaded an image of a boy with the syndrome, showing some features
Talk:Raoul Bova

message: Raul is the correct name — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.221.79.85 (talk) 14:13, 16 September 2006
:False. Raoul is correct. Look at his OFFICIAL site: www.raoulbova.it --Gspinoza (talk) 15:46, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: An unregistred user insists on deleting the Arbereshe origin of Bova's mother.The Arbereshe origin is sourced and the user hasn't explained yet why to delete a sourced information.NobleFrog (talk) 19:35, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: NB: I've noticed you have some problem with the space button after commas/fullstops [][]. Do you share the same keyboard with Rolandi+?Alexikoua (talk) 15:24, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Arbereshe Origin
Talk:Sunset Rubdown

message: Where does "We Got Broken Eyes" fit in their discography? --In Defense of the Artist 14:14, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The section was extremely long-windedand incredibly biased. The section contains all relevant information from last edit, in around 40% of the space. Hope it looks good to everyone. Passengers (talk) 03:30, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Musical style" section
Talk:Bayanihan

message: WTF are these guys doing here LAWL!!! kinda irrelevant to the topic (focus on culture) don't you think? but you might say we are practicing Bayanihan Getonyourfeet 16:23, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ...and the link ...project died? LOL... imma have to erase unreliable source (WP:RS) Getonyourfeet 16:57, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

text: I agree when you say that this article is focusing on culture. Yes it is because that basically the word bayanihan itself is a culture.  If you say practicing bayanihan is irrelevant because that bayanihan is a a spirit of volunteerism. Like in a situation that your neighbor ask you to help to move his house to higher ground. When you answer the call for help and other members of the community then that is bayanihan. 
In your Linux and MIT question be specific. I might suggest that to read the following link.
*http://groups.csail.mit.edu/cag/bayanihan/
*http://bayanihancomputing.net/
*http://groups.csail.mit.edu/cag/bayanihan/papers/eurotools98/index.html
Bonvallite (talk) 04:55, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Linux? MIT?

message: Near the end of the article, there is this:
"Bayanihan is taken from the root word bayani meaning "hero"."
Which seems redundant since it's already established at the beginning of said article that Bayanihan is taken from the word bayan. Furthermore...doesn't "bayani" derive itself from the word "bayan" as well?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Relaxdiego (talk • contribs) 01:33, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Bayan or Bayani???
Talk:Carol Grace

message: * Both the IMDB and IBD say her birth surname was “Marcus”, but this is unlikely because her mother only married Charlie Marcus when Carol was 8 years old.  So, she was born “Carol Grace <something>”, then at age 8 she became “Carol Grace Marcus”.  
* In 1942 she appeared on stage in “Across the Board on Tomorrow Morning and Talking to You” as “Carol Marcus”.  All her later stage appearances were as “Carol Grace”.  As “Carol Grace” she also published “The Secret in the Daisy” (1955) and made 2 feature films, “Gangster Story” (1960) and “Mickie and Nicky” (1976).
*But it seems she was still known as “Carol Marcus” in her private life.  At least until she married William Saroyan, then she became “Carol Saroyan”, or “Carol Marcus Saroyan”.
*Then she married Walter Matthau and became “Carol Matthau”, under which name she published “Among the Porcupines” (1992).   She was also referred to in the media as “Carol Saroyan Matthau”, but I doubt she used this formulation herself as she divorced Saroyan - twice.
*I've made some edits along these lines.  --  JackofOz (talk) 23:54, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Her names

message: Please be judicious, and reluctant to use the "citation needed"  tag. I found this  tag in the article over 7 years after it was inserted. At least two of the references present in the article gave the citation wanted. I do not know when the references were put into the article, but either the "citation needed"  tag was inserted carelessly, or the person providing the references was careless in not removing the tag. Nick Beeson (talk) 11:46, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: With events which were either not published anywhere or events which happened in earlier years in other language spaces there is hardly a possibility to provide a citation. Wikipedia's rules were made for the internet age, and what happened before does not fit the mould.  2001:8003:A070:7F00:187B:58CA:3673:A2DA (talk) 02:30, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation Needed
Talk:Francelia Billington

message: FYI editors: I just uploaded a movie still with Billington in it. I also started a draft page for the silent short: Draft:At the Stroke of the Angelus. Plz link as you see fit. (Also note there is an existing link for this short on the page for Mary Rider.)
KKelvinThompson (talk) 20:56, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Movie still uploaded
Talk:A. Ramachandran

message: This article, as written, seems to me to be an advertisement for the artist's webpage. There are no non WP:SPS sources, so I wonder if it even passes WP:N. I've asked a fellow editor to comment on my opinion. — trlkly 17:55, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I adjusted the wikilink - I think you meant self-published sources as self-references are when the page discusses wikipedia itself.  If I'm wrong, feel free to turn it back.  The page does read a bit like an advertisement, but there are two external links that are independent and seem to indicate notability.  Also, here is a news story focusing on Ramachandran.  It definitely needs cleanup, but the subject does seem to be notable.  WLU (talk) 19:36, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: As I said on your talk page, that clarifies things immensely. I was trying to change this to a more standard citation style, and I noticed that there were quite a few WP:SPS (yeah, I get those mixed up), and decided it wasn't worth fixing until more sources were found. I just jumped the gun calling it unnotable, since I've been learning new things about that policy. — trlkly 05:00, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Advertisement
Talk:List of lists of lists

message: Would something like list of guitars go under "music" or under "technology"? Orchastrattor (talk) 18:07, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Neither, because it's not a List of lists of guitars. (However, if it were, it could go under both. There's no rule that each list of lists can only be in one place.) pburka (talk) 23:32, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Musical instruments 

message: A list of diseases / disorders could be added under "Medicine" easily since you already have such lists in Wikipedia. 2600:1700:7804:80:2E36:1C02:BDDE:5605 (talk) 06:33, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: But is there a list of lists of diseases? —Tamfang (talk) 00:58, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  List to add under "Medicine" 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Not moved  * Pppery * it has begun... 20:49, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: List of lists of lists →  – In accordance with the general title conventions for lists, a majority of titles listed in List of lists of lists are of the format ‘Lists of X’, rather than ‘List of lists of X’. List of lists of lists itself, from my understanding, should not deviate from this standard (with ‘X’, in this case, being ‘lists’). Additionally, some may find the existing title to be confusing, because each one of its five words is either ‘List’, ‘lists’, or ‘of’. Reducing the title length by two words may ease this confusion. I thus propose the renaming of List of lists of lists to Lists of lists. –Gluonz talk contribs 17:37, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 27 March 2024 

message: The redirect List of lists has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  – BrandonXLF (talk) 09:14, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:List of lists]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Enrique Molina (actor)

message: I took the basic list from the ICAIC website. There are a few differences with IMDB.
*Polvo Rojo, Jibaro and Una Novia para David aren't on IMBd.
*Alicia... and Caravana are 1990 per ICAIC but 1991 and 1992 respectively by IMDb.
*Derecho de asilo is 1993 on IMDb but 1994 per ICAIC.
*Paraiso is 1999 per ICAIC, 2000 on IMDb.
*...sueco is 2000 per ICAIC, 2001 per IMDb.
*ICAIC don't list El Benny, 90 millas, ¿La vida en rosa?, Concurso, El Último vagón, or ¿Quién eres tú?
*IMDb doesn't show Barrio Cuba.
*..Mauricio is 2005 per ICAIC, 2006 per IMDb.
I suspect that ICAIC may list the main year of production rather than release - but that doesn't explain Derecho de asilio.
-- Beardo 14:44, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Filmography

message: ICAIC have a long list of mentions and prizes.  Not sure whether to include any of that here.  -- Beardo 15:04, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mentions and prizes 

message: This was on my watchlist for a while, and when it was moved i looked at it again. most of the text was translated from a copyrighted page, but most of the facts seem noncontroversial, and i changed the wording a bit, and trimmed out some promotional language. i gonna try to link movies if possible.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 16:41, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fixup
Talk:Gloydius halys

message: I would make it a redirect to Gloydius but then that would mess up the categories. I don't really want to put the Korean snake category on Gloydius. This korean snake thing is rather new. Please give it some time. I'll be moving to Korea soon and maybe I can do more when I get there. --Gbleem 14:32, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: AFAIK this species is notable as the only Crotalid (pitviper) in Europe.  (There may or may not be another species of Gloydius with which G. halys shares this honour.  All the other known vipers in Europe are true vipers of the genera Vipera, Macrovipera, and Montivipera.)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mia229 (talk • contribs) 06:04, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  geographic range
Talk:Adrian Baker

message: Um, does no one else think that the number of genres in the infobox is a tad too much? Dpm12 (talk) 05:01, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox genres
Talk:Al Green (wrestler)

message: Just a note for the Al Green page, the correct spelling of his ringname is "Al Green", verified by his personal myspace and facebook pages. "Al Greene" is incorrect when referring to this person (Alfred Dobalo). Wf.the.assassin.wf (talk) 23:40, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Al Green/Al Greene 
Talk:List of plants in the Bible

message: Is there a way to have an option to organize the references in order of appearance in the bible, in addition to or instead of alphabetically?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.64.210.198 (talk) 02:40, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article is somewhat missleading since the names of the plant in the bible have a different meaning than the one used today. e.g. pine (Jerusalem pine).
Omri
: Well, that would be the task of any translator, wouldn't it? To find out which plants are meant originally?
: As the original names are in Hebrew and date back several thousand years, there is always the question of correct translations. And for many Biblical plants, this question cannot be answered for certain. But that doesn't mean it's not worth trying, does it?  Anna (talk) 16:51, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: How about linking this article to the corresponding ones in other languages (in both directions, if possible)? E.g. this one: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pflanzen_in_der_Bibel 
Maybe someone who knows how to do it would be so kind as to do it? Anna (talk) 16:51, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links 

message: I notice that the original article and the clone both list such things as “pine” and “flowers”.  This suggests the problematic nature of the list as its contributors have conceptualized it.  Consider:
:Genesis 2:5: And every plant of the field before it was in the earth, and every herb of the field before it grew: for the LORD God had not caused it to rain upon the earth, and there was not a man to till the ground.
That picks up every cultivar that the author(s) would have believed existed in that first week-or-so.
My suggestion is that the article have an explicit discussion of the issue, a section on plants more specifically mentioned in the Bible, and a section of any other plants that are frequently used in these gardens based upon archæological evidence or somesuch. —SlamDiego←T 14:53, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criteria for inclusion 
Talk:Alicja Bachleda-Curuś

message: There seems to be relationship between this actress and the Polish speed skater? --Kvasir (talk) 20:49, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see my answer to your query at the ref. desk. — Kpalion(talk) 21:39, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Katarzyna Bachleda-Curuś‎]]

message: Finally there are some good new pictures of Alicja! I wonder if anyone can post more pictures of Alicja.Julieprus (talk) 15:57, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: New Photos of Alicja Bachleda
Talk:Alimzhan Tokhtakhunov

message: As of 2021, where does Tokhtakhounov live? 173.88.246.138 (talk) 12:08, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Where does he live?
Talk:Allan Sirois

message: Is a career minor-leaguer really deserving of his own encyclopedia article?   209.105.207.181 00:17, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Amedeo Amadei

message: Hi! After a couple recent edits by an IP, there is a lot of conflicting stats written here, listed in sources, and listed on it.wiki. Mind taking a look into this? Thanks. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 07:53, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  Hi, ! Thanks for this. It appears that some goals were scored during the "After War" Championship, which is why his Roma profile shows 15 goals fewer scored in Serie A than in the "Enciclopedia del Calcio" page. I haven't looked at the rest of the stats listed on his RSSSF page to see why they don't add up. Having said that, I don't see 84 goals in Serie A during his second Roma spell anywhere.
Best, Messirulez (talk) 15:29, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Stats
Talk:Anders Petersen (photographer)

message: This article has been reverted by a bot to  as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) This has been done to remove User:Accotink2's contributions as they have a history of extensive copyright violation and so it is assumed that all of their major contributions are copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. VWBot (talk) 14:21, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 
Talk:Tom Delaney (racing driver)

message: The following (between the horizontal lines) was contributed by DTDelaney. Much of it has now been wikified and incorporated into the article as it now stands. Note that Tom Delaney's date of death is here given as 31 August. I see no choice but to continue with the 1 September date in the article until and unless a written and independently verifiable source for "31 August" emerges, but for what it's worth I think it should be 31 August. Meeting WP:V is the problem here. Loganberry (Talk) 14:54, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  From DTDelaney / date of death 

message: Thanks to Carcharoth who provided the link to the Daily Telegraph obituary, and thus a reliable source for the 31 August date of death. Autosport said (it seems erroneously) 1 September, so that's worth bearing in mind for anyone doing further research. Loganberry (Talk) 22:56, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of death again
Talk:Kaunas Castle

message: This is surreal to see this article on the main page since i was at Lithuania from late  June all through July visiting my relatives and went to many castles including this one. We have filmed the castle and its interiors inside (we actually thought you had to pay to get in but found out you don't!), at the top, the glass is obviously added but the view of the horizon is nice.--Mole Man 00:48, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  I was just there 
Talk:Andrew Sears

message: The article needs considerable expansion, greater detail and more length is needed. Given this article Stub-Class —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bradelle2619 (talk • contribs) 06:58, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment 
Talk:CentGas

message: {{WikiProject Energy|class 
This article is about same topic as Trans-Afghanistan Pipeline. They need to merged or to leave here only information concerning Central Asia Gas Pipeline Ltdusjsucgcsjsisxujdjs (CentGas) consortium and move all information related to the pipeline together with interlinks into article Trans-Afghanistan Pipeline. Both article needs also editing.Beagel 15:03, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Spencer Moon

message: "When she started showing an interest, Spencer was thrilled, and after just one date the two ended up in bed together. However, Stacey was lying about her age, she was only 15 and when Spencer finally admitted that he wasn't the wealthy entrepreneur that he claimed to be, she informed him of her age and told him that unless she gave him money she would shop him to the police for soliciting an underage girl. Spencer was mortified and was forced to pay her hush money for a while, until he finally stood up to her and called her bluff."
I have edited this as it is incorrect: Stacey was 16 when she slept with Spencer and lied about her age so that she could blackmail him. According to the offical website she slept with Spencer on her 16th birthday preciesly. Therefore he had not comitted any crime.
(Steve 15:06, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I added the  tag to the "history" section of this article because it appears to be littered with words and phrases such as "flogging dodgy gear" and "bag a kiss", which I don't think are appropriate. The Baroness of Morden (talk) 12:11, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible re-write 

message: Just been reading through this article and noticed the paragraph on him approaching his 18th birthday. Well his birthdate is listed as April 1983 which means he would have celebrated his 18th birthday in April 2001; but he arrived in November 2002? Was he SORASED? Alex250P (talk) 20:47, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Unlikely to be SORAS, I'd say the date of birth has been listed wrong in this article. I think the dates of birth used to be on the EastEnders website, and there are two archived links for Spencer's profile in the Internet Archive, but I can't get either of them to load to be able to check. AnemoneProjectors (talk) 22:03, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Age Confusion
Talk:Anthony Russell (bishop)

message: A bishop who was ordained in 1970 as a priest cannot have a birth year in 1989 (which follows the year he was first appointed a bishop)!Cloptonson (talk) 15:15, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Erroneous birth year