lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:KRQE

message: I've removed the part of this entry stating the show was shot in the lobby. I was on the show May 5th 1965 and it was quite certainly shot in a studio.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.239.119.18 (talk) 17:14, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like the statement wasn't supposed to be that the show was filmed in the lobby, but that the host was shot in the lobby and later died from the wound. I've adjusted it a bit to try to clear it up. --Onorem♠Dil 16:16, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Do you think KBIM-TV and KREZ-TV should have separate articles? Mvcg66b3r (talk) 21:57, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. KREZ is going to be challenging as the Durango Herald isn't anywhere but it also tried a standalone attempt at being itself before being burned to the ground. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 22:03, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, I just got started on KBIM-TV. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 23:36, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article split? 

message: Can you fix it 2600:1011:B021:EDD8:0:17:AE4F:A601 (talk) 01:36, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  We don't have local channels north of aztec
Talk:Mitsuko Baisho

message: Shouldn't this article be translated to English? Kukini 07:08, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Question
Talk:Jacob (disambiguation)

message: This list does not belong here—per WP:MOSDAB, the only thing that belongs on a disambiguation page is a list of links to articles related to the ambiguous term.  The multi-lingual list should be moved to a Jacob (name) page, or dropped.  Look at John for an example of how this is properly handled. —johndburger 13:20, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of linguistic variants
Talk:KSAX

message: Hello, Please do not add unreferenced names as entries to a list of former employees in articles. Including this type of material in articles does not abide by current consensus and its inclusion is strongly discouraged in our policies and guidelines. The rationales are as follows:
#WP:NOT tells us, Wikipedia is "not an indiscriminate collection of information."  As that section describes, just because something is true, doesn't necessarily mean the info belongs in Wikipedia.  
#As per WP:V, we cannot include information in Wikipedia that is not verifiable and sourced. 
# WP:NLIST tells us that lists included within articles (including people's names) are subject to the same need for references as any other information in the article. 
#Per WP:BLP, we have to be especially careful about including un-sourced info about living persons.
If you look at articles about companies in general, you will not find mention of previous employees, except in those cases where the employee was particularly notable.  Even then, the information is not presented just as a list of names, but is incorporated into the text itself (for example, when a company's article talks about the policies a previous CEO had, or when they mention the discovery/invention of a former engineer/researcher). If a preexisting article is already in the encyclopedia for the person you want to add to a list, it's generally regarded as sufficient to support their inclusion in list material in another article. cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 16:19, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding unreferenced entries of former employees to lists containing BLP material
Talk:KSKN

message: I live in their market area and drive by their studios every morning on the way to work. KSKN is starting to brand themselves "KSKN 22" instead of "WB 22" in broadcasts when they are not calling themselves KREM2. 
The WB22 bug is still currently in use, but the "KSKN 22" logo that is on their building is starting to replace the WB one in promos. 
Alemily 06:26, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It appears that the current logo can be made into an SVG just like the KAYU Logo. The same could apply with the KXMN logo. mechamind90 04:23, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: SVG
Talk:KSMO-TV

message: What Day Did KSMO Changed Its On-Air Branding To My-KSMO-TV?12.216.121.118 (talk) 00:44, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: My-KSMO-TV

message: http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-meredith-time-inc-20171126-story.html
This proposed deal involves Time inc's assets and Meredith's assets coming into one entity. As of  November 2017 the Koch Brothers has been named as people involved in the deal. Its a pending deal that affects Meredith owned stations. 
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/26/business/dealbook/time-inc-meredith-corporation-koch-brothers.html?_r=0  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.86.14.44 (talk) 23:00, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Pending Deal with Meredith and Time inc

message: If a reason isn't obvious it should be stated in the discussion or have the protection removed  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.53.168.200 (talk) 20:52, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I just logged out and was still allowed to edit this page. It isn't protected. SilverCityChristmasIsland 20:54, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Why is this page protected?
Talk:KSNF

message: Hello, Please do not add unreferenced names as entries to the list of former employees in articles. Including this type of material in articles does not abide by current consensus and its inclusion is strongly discouraged in our policies and guidelines. The rationales are as follows:
#WP:NOT tells us, Wikipedia is "not an indiscriminate collection of information."  As that section describes, just because something is true, doesn't necessarily mean the info belongs in Wikipedia.  
#As per WP:V, we cannot include information in Wikipedia that is not verifiable and sourced. 
# WP:NLIST tells us that lists included within articles (including people's names) are subject to the same need for references as any other information in the article. 
#Per WP:BLP, we have to be especially careful about including un-sourced info about living persons.
If you look at articles about companies in general, you will not find mention of previous employees, except in those cases where the employee was particularly notable.  Even then, the information is not presented just as a list of names, but is incorporated into the text itself (for example, when a company's article talks about the policies a previous CEO had, or when they mention the discovery/invention of a former engineer/researcher). If a preexisting article is already in the encyclopedia for the person you want to add to a list, it's generally regarded as sufficient to support their inclusion in list material in another article. cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 02:30, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding unreferenced entries of former employees to lists containing BLP material 

message: Since KSNF no longer uses "Your Hometown News" as its moniker, and hasn't since 2012, shouldn't this article include an updated logo to reflect that? --2602:306:CEAF:26A0:B522:8E9B:118B:F6E8 (talk) 03:56, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Updated logo
Talk:KSNT

message: If you watch KSNT/KTMJ for your news source, here is the userbox you can display on your user page if you'd like. The code is . Corkythehornetfan(talk) 23:44, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Userbox

message: I propose that Johnny Kane be moved to said section. Reasoning: Has left station; Moved to KC, going to be on KMBC. 4.244.81.94 (talk) 00:48, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moving Johnny Kane to former on air staff 
Talk:KGHZ

message: I request that this article be semi-protected due to rampant vandalism. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 19:28, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for semi-protection 
Talk:KSWO-TV

message: Does anyone else remember Goeff Golf or Goff?  He was a reporter, but I don't remember the years.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.20.106.172 (talk) 18:59, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hello, Please do not add unreferenced names as entries to the list of former employees in articles. Including this type of material in articles does not abide by current consensus and its inclusion is strongly discouraged in our policies and guidelines. The rationales are as follows:
#WP:NOT tells us, Wikipedia is "not an indiscriminate collection of information."  As that section describes, just because something is true, doesn't necessarily mean the info belongs in Wikipedia.  
#As per WP:V, we cannot include information in Wikipedia that is not verifiable and sourced. 
# WP:NLIST tells us that lists included within articles (including people's names) are subject to the same need for references as any other information in the article. 
#Per WP:BLP, we have to be especially careful about including un-sourced info about living persons.
If you look at articles about companies in general, you will not find mention of previous employees, except in those cases where the employee was particularly notable.  Even then, the information is not presented just as a list of names, but is incorporated into the text itself (for example, when a company's article talks about the policies a previous CEO had, or when they mention the discovery/invention of a former engineer/researcher). If a preexisting article is already in the encyclopedia for the person you want to add to a list, it's generally regarded as sufficient to support their inclusion in list material in another article.  cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 05:04, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding unreferenced entries of former employees to lists containing BLP material 
Talk:Euphronios

message: Hello : You can see the french Wikipedia for find free licenced pictures of work of Euphronios. - Siren-Fr 07:19, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed the image; thanks.  I'm much more comfortable not using a fair use image. Chick Bowen 12:31, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:KTAL-TV

message: Hello, Please do not add unreferenced names as entries to the list of former employees in articles. Including this type of material in articles does not abide by current consensus and its inclusion is strongly discouraged in our policies and guidelines. The rationales are as follows:
#WP:NOT tells us, Wikipedia is "not an indiscriminate collection of information."  As that section describes, just because something is true, doesn't necessarily mean the info belongs in Wikipedia.  
#As per WP:V, we cannot include information in Wikipedia that is not verifiable and sourced. 
# WP:Source list tells us that lists included within articles (including people's names) are subject to the same need for references as any other information in the article. 
#Per WP:BLP, we have to be especially careful about including un-sourced info about living persons.
If you look at articles about companies in general, you will not find mention of previous employees, except in those cases where the employee was particularly notable.  Even then, the information is not presented just as a list of names, but is incorporated into the text itself (for example, when a company's article talks about the policies a previous CEO had, or when they mention the discovery/invention of a former engineer/researcher). If a preexisting article is already in the encyclopedia for the person you want to add to a list, it's generally regarded as sufficient to support their inclusion in list material in another article. cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 13:31, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding unreferenced entries of former employees to lists containing BLP material 
Talk:KTBC (TV)

message: I remembered there was a FOX7 logo which contained a star in a yellow-blue background after the network switch.  But the logo was changed in 1997 to conform with Fox's logo standardizations (if any), and I could not find it anywhere on the internet.  So if there is any chance someone at Wikipedia knows where one can be located on the internet (if somewhere), then it would be much appreciated if it were posted on this article soon.  __GETONERD84 18:33, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  FOX7 Star logo 1995-1997 

message: Having worked in commercial broadcast TV - especially for the station in question, *re*broadcast is the *official* term for anything that's tape-delayed and transmitted from a time after its original network airdate. This was not a typo or an error on my part when I fleshed out this section several months ago. Please do not change this back, as this is correct. 66.90.151.114 02:28, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broadcast vs Rebroadcast 

message: the TV station info box is programmed to automatically display the logo and there is no reason to believe it was programmed to display it at an inappropriate size and have each article gimp additional coding to fix the master error. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 03:11, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  image in the infobox 

message: https://www.statesman.com/business/sinclair-owner-cbs-austin-could-soon-own-fox-too/fLk0IMhWcJ9wuPzIww9kTJ/
According to Austin Statesman on May 9th, 2018 Fox has offered KTBC Austin and WPWR Chicago for trade as part of a trade deal between Fox and Sinclair for Sinclair's 7 Divested Stations in Seattle, Sacramento, Cleveland and San Diego Notably.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.169.130.165 (talk) 16:37, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: KTBC to Sinclair?

message: Shortly before it switched its affiliation to Fox, KTBC dropped its -TV suffix in 1994. The digital callsign is KTBC-DT. RVal02 (talk) 02:21, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  KTBC-TV callsign
Talk:HaJaBaRaLa

message: While I appreciate that both are related, shouldn't the focus be the original (more-widely read version here)? If necessary we can disambig and create a second page for Basu's translated version. Antorjal (talk) 16:22, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are we talking about Sukumar Ray's book here or Jayinee Basu's translation? 

message: What is the meaning of the word "HJBRL"/"হযবরল"? PTSYANGFERG (talk) 16:38, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meaning
Talk:KTFQ-TV

message: Since articles on television stations are based on the licensed facility in which this case would be facility # 35084. The history listed here including the callsign history and past affiliations and sign on date is that of current KLUZ-TV channel 14 or FCC facility # 57220. KLUZ occupied this station until 2017 however the history section mostly lists the period owned by Paxson Communications which never owned this facility. Although that information is listed briefly on the KLUZ page it has nothing to do with this station. A bit of history on KTFQ prior to moving to channel 41 would be appropriate however the callsign history and airdate need to be corrected.Rj24 (talk) 02:45, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accuracy dispute
Talk:KTNV-TV

message: 05:41, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Yes, I have proof

message: 12.139.233.98 (talk) 23:05, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  We aren't all bad 
Talk:KTUD-CD

message: Remember this is an encyclopedia, not a marketing engine.  Talking about products that make a company is one thing.  Pimping said products is another! Dennislv (talk) 06:08, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marketing No-no's 
Talk:KTVI

message: does anyone have a better less fuzzier photo of the current KTVI logo? Open poppyseed 00:43, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo 
Talk:KTVQ

message: :Image:Ktvq.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Youre A MORON Dont delete that image!   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.167.123.5 (talk) 23:04, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Ktvq.jpg
Talk:KTVW-DT

message: I removed the following information from the article, as the source of the data (http://members.aol.com/cingram/television/dumonta10.htm) does not meet the Wikipedia standard for a reliable source. If anyone can provide a reliably-sourced reference for this information, please feel free to restore the information:
:*The channel 33 allocation in Phoenix was once home to a station with call letters KGPA-TV. It is not known whether the defunct station was actually operational or was an unbuilt construction permit.
dhett (talk • contribs) 04:55, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unreliably-sourced information 

message: The sentence in the article says KFPH is must carry yet it disappeared off of Dish's locals on June 30, 2018 because of a retransmission dispute with Univision. Can a must carry station be included in a retransmission dispute [for fees]? DJLon (talk) 00:48, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dish retransmission dispute
Talk:KTWO-TV

message: I removed this section because, simply put, I don't quite understand just what the controversy is.  They share a building with other stations?  How is this controversial?  IMHO -- it looks like the section is trying to imply that the station is doing something untowards with other stations in town... which isn't the point of the article.  The article should, instead, provide verifiable information about the station and not speculate on what the station is doing behind the scenes. Amnewsboy 09:03, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Station Location Controversy

message: Just curious if anyone knows why reporters keep dropping like flies from KTWO. Makes it hard to watch when there is a new reporter every week. --ḾỊḼʘɴίcả • Talk • I DX for fun! 05:42, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, not sure in 2011, but in 2020, KTWO-TV, along with KFNB and KGWC-TV were acquired by Vision Alaska, Coastal Television and Big Horn Television. They immediately fired off reporters and dropped newscasts. Not exactly the answer to your question, but kind of updated. Brainyshark03 21:01, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where does everyone keep going? 

message: I personally believe in my opinion that KKTQ-LD deserves its own article. KKTQ-LD (in Cheyenne), according to the KTWO-TV article, airs its own station identifications and commercials on top of clearing ABC programming provided by KTWO. This would technically make it a semi-satellite of KTWO. It even has its own logo. See here. Brainyshark03 20:54, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should KKTQ-LD get its own article?
Talk:KTXA

message: http://boards.radio-info.com/smf/index.php?PHPSESSID=3c9323e6043bf6f74c4de45cf8f729d5&topic=180318.0
KTXA is not moving to 29, KLDT-TV 54 is already on 29.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.89.174.176 (talk) 03:03, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  KTXA 

message: I just wanted to inform you that KTXA is no longer airing Texas Rangers games, as they are now exclusive to Bally Sports Southwest. I therefore request the page be updated to reflect this change. I would normally do it myself, but I have no idea when the station stopped airing Rangers games.
I also have reason to believe that the station stopped airing Mavericks and Stars games too, but I'm not sure if that's true. 100.7.36.213 (talk) 02:05, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  No longer airing Rangers games
Talk:KTTZ-TV

message: This article needs a rewrite a lot of the sections do not have headers and need restructing. I have maked the article for a rewrite and will probably work on it myself. 
MarkRomero 21:10, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite 
Talk:Kyiv Funicular

message: As far as DYK goes, two things come to mind first of all:
*Similarly to Kiev tram being the first, this was the first funicular in the RU Empire
*Following the transfer of the capital, the funicular was supposed to be demolished in order to satisfy the administrative building construction and expansions plans as well the hemongous Lenin monument. Neither was implemented because the war started. So, in a way, it was "saved" by a war.
Here are some links to expand the article. I yandexed the RU L sites to get links readable to more people (my apologies to those who can read in Ukrainian but not in English) but more info in UA L can be easily yandexed. BTW, if you use Yandex rather then google, it will automatically included results of the search term in different cases, genders and declensions. YAndex "knows" both Ukrainian and Russian and, therefore, seems often preferable to google.
http://www.home.ru/funiculars/kiev.html , http://www.nostalgia2.kiev.ua/funikuler.shtml , http://community.livejournal.com/interesniy_kiev/133990.html?nc=1 , http://midrasha.net/lessons.php?art=2&id=883&mode=114&book=78&lang=1 , http://www.yutta.kiev.ua/kiev/fun/ , http://www.versii.com/telegraf/material.php?id=4717&nomer=278 --Irpen 07:33, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure that the Kiev funicular was the first funicular in the RU Empire. The website  states that the Nizhniy Novgorod funicular was built on the 15th of July, 1896, and it also states  that the Tbilisi funicular was opened near 1905, (I think it was opened after the Kiev funicular). Anyway the Kiev funicular probably was the second in the RU empire, which might be used for DYK, if we should decide to nominate it. Thanks, --DDima 01:32, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: DYK

message: I have removed the reference to gantlet track. It seems clear from the pictures, that away from the passing loop, there are just two rails. Gantlet track, as defined here, is four rails providing overlapping tracks. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 17:11, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Gantlet?
Talk:KUHT

message: I have moved this article from KUHT-TV to KUHT. Consensus on both WP:NC#Broadcasting and Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Television_Stations#Article_names is that the article name should reflect the actual call letters of the TV station. As can be seen here:  the call letters for this station are in fact KUHT. Any concerns regarding this topic would be best addressed here: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Television_Stations. —A 04:49, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name 

message: The "Houston Public Television" logo had 2 logos. The image being used is the first. Does anybody have the second logo? If so, please place it on the article.--70.240.215.204 (talk) 05:40, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Houston Public Television" logo 

message: This article needs to be revised, as last week or so, the station was rebranded into Houston Public Media. The network's call letters remain the same, but the network, as well as Houston Public Radio have been merged into one whole network.--Loyalmoonie (talk) 17:07, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Houston PBS is now Houston Public Media 