Talk:Louisville Museum Plaza

message: The overall structure and content of this article (except the cites) is of high quality, but the quotations give the article a brochure feel, and I don't think this is appropriate for the Wikipedia.  I think they should be removed. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 18:15, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I added them in at a time when the project was a "sure-go" from the developers. They can be removed without any content-harm; feel free to go ahead.  Seicer (talk) (contribs) 18:36, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Brochure quotations

message: Is this dispute still active or can I close it?  --Ideogram 01:42, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it still is.  I'm seeking an explanation as to why the Harvard-style citations are being used instead of using the standard cite templates -- certainly there is a rationale for it but it hasn't been offered as of yet.  Further, I believe there is currently a 2-to-1 consensus in favor of using the templates.  Thank you for your assistance. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 16:47, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  It's been covered in the Cabal. As far as I know, since I submitted the request, I will consider it closed.  Seicer (talk) (contribs) 16:57, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I was never provided a link to the case, so I didn't even know it was open.  I just provided responses to the case. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 17:02, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

text: On deeper review, it appears a link was given, but because I'm not concentrating much on Wikipedia lately, I just didn't realize that it was a link to an open case.  I was thinking it was a link to a former case or guideline.  That's what I get for going on wikibreak. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 17:16, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mediation request 

message: This project is dead and they're trying to sell the site. Why is this page not reflecting that? AEGON will remain Louisville's tallest for the foreseeable future.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.63.217.124 (talk) 00:44, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have any sources to back up the assertion that the project is dead? Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 02:53, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe there was a C-J article that stated that financing was holding up the project (the same story we've been hearing for months), but "dead"? For now, yes. I'll see if I can find it on SSP. seicer | talk | contribs 02:55, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  This project is DEAD 

message: What is the point of this statement in the article: "it would also be taller than any building in Cincinnati, Columbus, Memphis, Nashville, New Orleans, Oklahoma City (until completion of Devon Tower in 2012), Jacksonville, Baltimore, San Antonio, Austin, Phoenix, Milwaukee, Kansas City, San Diego, or St. Louis."?  Phizzy  19:20, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  it would also be taller than... 

message: Substituted at 22:31, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Louisville Museum Plaza. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://www.whas11.com/news/local/4-years-later-Museum-Plaza-still-on-track-83834952.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110419051214/http://www.whas11.com:80/news/local/Museum-Plaza-hopes-HUD-is-answer-to-construction-97190444.html to http://www.whas11.com/news/local/Museum-Plaza-hopes-HUD-is-answer-to-construction-97190444.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:24, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified