Talk:Constitution of Venezuela

message: Suggestion: Was there a constitution previous to this one, and how are they different? AdamRetchless 13:13, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The Constition was 'Bolivarian-Marxist'?  How about Socialist?
:Is there a reliable source for that claim? Danotto94 (talk) 03:39, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Bolivarian-Marxist' 

message: JRSP, what was the problem with this? Does it need another source, or is the number wrong?  I thought it was accurate?  Sandy 12:15, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Opposition was calling to vote "no", there were no boycott from main opp groups. Results were not controversial, I don't know of any significant group challenging the legitimacy of the constitution JRSP 12:53, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of boycott 

message: Does anyone know what the constitution says with regard to Venezuela's national boundaries? My understanding is that Venezuela claims over half of Guyana in what it calls "Guayana Esequiba." Historically Venezuela has regarded Guayana Esequiba as a state occupied illegally by Guyana. It would be interesting to note if the new constitution maintains this claim.72.198.79.196 (talk) 01:38, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Has anyone figured this out? Danotto94 (talk) 03:37, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guayana Esequiba dispute 

message: Are there articles regarding the past constitutions of Venezuela? If not, should there be a history section in this article giving a summary of those constitutions? If so, should there be wikilinks to those articles on this article page, possibly in the see also section?--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 15:03, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical Information 

message: "Marginalized" seems POV.  Is there a less pejorative term?   86.159.35.255 (talk) 02:20, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legislature 

message: I was told it's an opinion blog that shouldn't be used in Wiki.  should I look for other sources or just remove mentions of the site? Danotto94 (talk) 03:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The particular article you were citing was an opinion piece.  I said "The Venezuelaanalysis.com article is clearly labelled as an opinion piece, and the views in it should be presented as such if they are included at all," in reference to the article you were citing at Venezuela.  I did not say that the whole site is an opinion blog, and I did not say that the site cannot be used on Wikipedia. Ian.thomson (talk) 03:42, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of venezuelaanalysis.com as a source 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Constitution of Venezuela. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050118010041/http://www.gobiernoenlinea.ve/docMgr/sharedfiles/059.pdf to http://www.gobiernoenlinea.ve/docMgr/sharedfiles/059.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:11, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified