lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:What I Believe (E. M. Forster essay)

message: So there is a tag proposing a split, would the person who left the tag, or anyone else for that matter, care to put forward some reasons? Beeblbrox (talk) 20:01, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, they only share a name. Unless there is a source to say that the two were part of a series, it seems reasonable to split them because they are distinct things, like Paris and Paris, Texas. As far as I can tell, Russell and Forster's essays were produced independently, without the intention of them being directly compared, and they cover different subject matter. —Tom Morris (talk) 18:13, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split? 

message: :There should be two separate articles, they can be linked and compared, but they are separate. If it is okay with everyone I will do that Toandael49 (talk) 23:28, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  I have removed Betrand Russell. I will expand this article some and then either make a new one for Russell or add Russell's to the Why I am not a Christian wikipedia article. what do you think?Toandael49 (talk) 23:43, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  It should be two articles 

message: :https://www.scribd.com/document/213540099/What-i-Believe  this seems to be verbatim what was in the article, or die this source take it from Wikipedia? Toandael49 (talk) 00:06, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  possible plagerism 

message: the essay What I Believe by Forster was part of the book Two Cheers for Democracy which has its own article. I think the whole article should be deleted as duplication. Because it seems to be the same as someone else writing, and is not referenced it should be deleted. What do you think?Toandael49 (talk) 00:13, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Part of Two Cheers for Democracy 

message: How notable is the Bertrand Russell essay? In ictu oculi (talk) 08:05, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: This probably needs a dab rather than a hatnote
Talk:Mercedes-Benz M271 engine

message: I own a CLK 200,1.8 Litre KOMPRESSOR, I have had an accident and need to replace the grill, bonnet, left hand guard and all three radiators.  But the thing is that I can't get these parts from anywhere in Australia, can anyone tell me where to  get them from? 49.197.69.18 (talk) 16:33, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parts for my CLK 200, 2005 KOMPRESSOR
Talk:Cocoon: The Return

message: Can more information be added regarding Zanuck's resistance to the sequel being made? 70.107.142.19 16:42, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Zanuck

message: The novel "Cocoon" by David Saperstein is the novelization of the movie "Cocoon", and there is a sequel to the novel "Cocoon" called "Metamorphosis", also by Saperstein.  Is this the novelization of the movie "Cocoon: The Return", or is it quite unrelated, and a different sequel story?
It would be good to be able to put this information into the article.  M.J.E. (talk) 16:31, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is novel sequel "Metamorphosis" related to "Cocoon: The Return"?
Talk:Arazi (horse)

message: Arazi's Timeform rating of 135 is certainly not "a score unmatched for a two-year-old."  In fact, Timeform have awarded nine two-year-olds ratings of 135 or more, the highest being the 142 awarded to Windy City in 1951.
In general, I feel that the tone of this article is slightly over-enthusiastic.  Racing history is littered with horses like Arazi: spectacularly precocious two-year-olds who for one reason or another never fulfilled their promise.  The Tetrarch is probably the most famous of these.  Bartflower 16:39, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening heading

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
* Move back to Arazi. This article was at simply Arazi until earlier today and there is no other article needing the title except a newly created page listing people with that surname. Move that page to Arazi (surname) and put a hatonote on this article pointing there. Station1 (talk) 01:54, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Silky Sullivan

message: While well-written, this article doesn't have an encyclopedic tone at all, but is written like a newspaper/journal article. Large parts are unreferenced, other problems include WP:WEASEL and WP:PEACOCK terms. Wikipedia articles should inform about the subject, not enshrine it. Malc82 (talk) 14:35, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rationale for "Tone"-tagging 

message: There should be a discussion of how "Silky Sullivan" has come to be used as a slang term for any come from behind win. —Viriditas | Talk 01:16, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slang term 

message: Tagged again. The tone of the article is totally unencyclopedic. Very few facts are properly referenced. I'll give it a week or two and then bring out the pruning shears. Tigerboy1966  14:13, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Tone
Talk:Buddhism in Malaysia

message: great article and it needs sources. Sethie 03:10, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Treaty of Aix-la-Chapelle

message: Should this page be directed to the 1748 treaty, as it is by far the most significant? Bringing to an end one of the largest wars in European history. A seperate Treaty of Aix-la-Chapelle (disambiguation) page could then be created.Lord Cornwallis (talk) 01:03, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect
Talk:Maine-Anjou

message: The last part looks like its straight from an pr-statement so I'm removing it:
"This breed is found in many countries: Canada, USA, the Russian Federation, Argentina, Japan, Australia, and New Zealand. Maine-Anjou cattle are- - Docile breed. - Hardy breed: in hard times it makes good use of available feed. - Very early sexual maturity: this breed can calve at a young age, from 24 months. - Excellent for cross breeding with any other breed of cattle, as they typically have small calves, with rapid growth, which makes excellent vealers with improved returns $$$$. -An efficient breed: excellent milk production means it dominates French breeds for the weight at weaning of its progeny - Heavy breed: has the highest carcass weights, gives great value to cull cows or heifers."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.230.85.120 (talk) 11:53, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Unencyclopedic statement

message: Does anyone have useful reference information to add about Bremer cattle?   — C M B J   23:00, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Bremer cattle
Talk:Sonoyta

message: Shouldn't this be under Sonoyta? I haven't seen it spelled any other way except in this article. Somebody who knows how should change it... thanks.
I was the annyonamous IP who changed the redirect of this page. --Tainter 00:42, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Space Center Houston

message: (EDIT a few minutes later, the Apollo 11 capsule is in D.C., not here) Is the Apollo 11 command capsule in this museum? There is an image of it near the bottom of the page, and the caption and information on the image's page suggests that it is in this facility. But the Apollo 11 capsule is not listed among the items in the collection in the page's text, nor listed as one of the space exhibits. Seems the only place it's mentioned on the page is in that gallery caption. Randy Kryn (talk) 03:37, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Apollo 11 command capsule
Talk:Ahmed Karamanli

message: do not merge an article about an individual with an article about a dynasty Hmains 03:19, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: The Karamanids are the Ancestor of the Karamanli Dynasty of Lybia  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.46.112.141 (talk) 16:04, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Karamanids 
Talk:Chinese Cinderella

message: I dont think this book is good, because throught the story, it was about a girl who is treated like garbage. I honestly think that this book is pointless.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.239.233.168 (talk) 18:57, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: This is a memorial section for little PLT. Let us remember her as a gentle, cute little duckling who always lala had time for Adeline, and was loyal to the horrible end. 
Alas, she was still a duckling.Why must the good die young, why?
76.20.233.39 (talk) 22:53, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  In Memory of PLT 

message: Chinese Cinderella is not a bad book... it is just a depressing and harsh book but the characters inside especially Adelines step mother Niang have bad or evil qualities. Chinese Cinderella is a book that to truly understand it you would have to be going through the same emotional and physical states. I commend Adeline Yen Mah for her courage in writing ths book it must have been very hard on her re writing the cruelties into a book and reliving every harsh word, every slap, every tear and all her child hood pain all over again.
116.250.90.81 (talk) 05:09, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chinese Cinderella! 

message: This article is written like an essay, it is also lacking in detail please take not of several things
- Information.  The plot does not mention most of the events in the story, tell us about Adeline's experiences, for example when Adeline stood up to Nian
-Quotes- perhaps the reader of this article would find it more relevant if quotes are included "...you are bad luck" for example
- more information about the book in the first section and a critic reaction paragraph  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.49.214.232 (talk) 12:05, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article not up to wikipedia standards 
Talk:Karamanli dynasty

message: do merge an article about an individual with an article about a dynasty. Hmains 03:21, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: , if you'd like to add a historical map to the article, you need to provide verifiable details for context, ideally based on reliable sources, otherwise this just looks like WP:OR ("original research"). The policy on original research cautions about the use of primary sources here, for good reason. Since there is already a similar map at Ottoman Tripolitania (the state/territory that this dynasty ruled) that is based on a reliable secondary source and isn't in Arabic, it seems preferable to just provide that map as general context for readers, if one is needed at all.
Note that I've already nominated the map image for deletion at Commons, given that you seem to have pulled it from another source without attribution. If the image is not copyright protected, then you can provide an explanation and the original soruce at the  to clear up the issue.
If you resort to personal attacks again, however, as you've already done multiple times, you'll be reported to administrators. That kind of behaviour will not get you far on Wikipedia. R Prazeres (talk) 02:39, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: do yourself a favor and stop babbling about an arabic map. Im arabic myself and libyan and i know the history of my ancestors more than you, best of luck “R Prazeres” Realityishere (talk) 10:30, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

text: And the expansion/map of the karamanli dynasty is not the same as tripolitania there were to head rulers. Your welcome Realityishere (talk) 10:32, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: , There were two head rulers* Realityishere (talk) 10:33, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

text: Let me just simplify the question: where did you get the map from? Keep in mind that Wikipedia:Verifiability is a core policy of Wikipedia, all edits must conform to it regardless of our personal knowledge or feelings. Can you please take a minute and make sure that you've read and understood it? This is the policy that I'm concerned about when it comes to your current edits here. It's an issue that might be easily resolved, if you just calm down and take a moment to answer this question sincerely, and we can start with that. R Prazeres (talk) 16:05, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map in lead 

message: I'd just like to make a general note that we have now had at least three iterations of confirmed sockpuppet accounts (currently blocked) who have been active on the article since March 2023 and who pushed the same WP:OR over and over again in the discussions above. Please also note that endlessly listing sources and quotes that do not support the proposed changes, and repeatedly pinging the same editor over and over again, does not help to solicit the consensus needed to accept any proposed changes. Finally, if this kind of disruption and misleading behaviour continues or gets worse, a request may be made for page protection, which will prevent new accounts and IPs from editing altogether. R Prazeres (talk) 17:17, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Persistent sockpuppetry on this page
Talk:Griffin (Marvel Comics)

message: The wording in the last few paragraphs of this is week. Plus, it doesn't deal with the fact that the Griffin somehow regressed inbetween his first appearance in Namor and later, so that he just sort of decides to become Namor's pet monster.
It also doesn't address how he got out of Namor's custody and onto the Raft (though I have no clue either, and it might not be dealt with in the comics at all) 72.92.117.242 (talk) 07:01, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Commentary

message: He was saved by Angel and then attacked him, and the Beast saved Angel?  Is that what this means?  Not really certain since I don't have those old issues.  Someone who read this please clarify.  Dream Focus 00:40, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wording in the first part is confusing 

message: The mention of this character in "Agents of SHIELD" has been added and removed (as "trivial", which is up against some fairly stiff competition given that we are talking about The Griffin!) about seven times in the last two weeks. So what now?
I have protected this article for two weeks due to persistent edit-warring, and will do so again if edit-warring resumes once the protection expires. Please refer to prior discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Comics#Griffin in Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. and comment there. BOZ (talk) 03:11, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert war
Talk:Byzantine Fresco Chapel

message: Seems mostly cut & paste from museum site - editors only edits. I've added a few lines at Menil Collection which is enough really, especially without better info on the works. Johnbod 00:18, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I am editing the article to move it beyond the information on the museum site; please join me in this. Argos'Dad 04:34, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added extant material on the collection.Argos'Dad 04:45, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio 

message: http://houston.culturemap.com/newsdetail/09-23-11-20-43-menil-returning-byzantine-frescoes-to-cypress/
Irish Melkite (talk) 06:20, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Frescoes Returning to Cyprus
Talk:Split-ticket voting

message: Someone who has more time than I currently do should add a paragraph or two at the end of the article about the Supreme Court ruling that political parties are private associations and, as such, have the free association right under the First Amendment to restrict their participation in primary elections to those voters who are members of their party - since it's the party's nominee who is being chosen, not the people's nominee.
76.126.3.38 (talk) 08:48, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Supreme Court Ruling

message: I'm trying to clean up this page, but the "controversies" section is a real mess. It says that in a South Carolina primary election certain questions about health insurance and government spending appeared only on the Republican ballot and not on the Democratic ballot. Now I don't know that much about US politics but I thought primary elections were about choosing a party's candidate, not a legally binding election. Given this, were the questions about health and spending legally binding referenda or simply proposals for party policies? If the latter, then how is it a controversy that they only appeared on one party's ballot, since presumably only that party would be making those suggestions as policy proposals? 
The controversies section also says that some states do not allow split ticket voting. Again, does this mean in real elections or just in the primary elections? If the latter, how is it a controversy? Allowing someone to select the Republican Party's presidential candidate and the Democratic Party's gubernatorial candidate would surely be utterly absurd.Colonial Overlord (talk) 03:59, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Since there's been no response for over a week, I've removed the entire "controversies" section until someone can fix it up so that it makes sense. Colonial Overlord (talk) 05:03, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  controversies 

message: do we really need separate pages for straight and split ticket? one is simply the opposite the other Gjxj (talk) 01:43, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge pages?
Talk:Camp Logan

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.tshaonline.org/handbook/online/articles/jch04. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  —Danorton (talk) 19:08, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Story of the Eye

message: As I'm about to purchase a copy of the Penguin Classics 2001 edition of this book, I will be in a position to write a synopsis for it. Clearly, Bataille's other translated fiction needs similar treatment.
User Calibanu 16.36, 13 November 2006
Having just finished the .pdf version offered at the site recommended at the bottom of this page I have to say that either the synopsis is just plain wrong or the translations vary substantially, and I'm not sure which it is but if it is the former something should probably be done by someone who is an arbiter of wikipedia Benladen (talk) 07:54, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Synopsis

message: When was this book first published? I also think it would be interesting to include the title in other languages than English and French (as many as possible) for further reference. 80.216.43.215 21:03, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Year

message: Unsure of how to format for Wikipedia, so I would like to add that Story of the Eye was notably referenced through CJ Leede's Maeve Fly. 2600:1700:96E0:9C30:B514:9ADC:A294:A0F6 (talk) 03:44, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional reference
Talk:Sugar Daddy (candy)

message: :Why use "kcals?"  That means "thousand calories," but that's in the scientific sense. In nutrition, the "kcal" is equal to one Calorie (as we "count calories"). Since they are actually equal, "53 kcal" is the same as "53 Cal" or "Calories." The first expression may invite confusion for the average reader. (Yes, people WOULD believe there are 53,000 Calories in a Junior Pop!) The second is unambiguous. Minor edit, I'm not much of a doer, but I can tackle it if no one else does. Agree? Object? Don't care? ??? Jororo05 (talk) 03:29, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Late, but in the UK kcal is used on nutrition labels. I don't know Wikipedia's policy on this though... --Undead Shambles (talk) 19:37, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing unit notation 

message: Missing is when and where it was invented and/or named.  (If it was common as a generic confection prior to this brand, that would be nice to know also.)  I can't figure out the edits history, but it seems like a relevant paragraph might have been deleted prior to the  first corporate acquisitioned mentioned. Alannyny (talk) 19:59, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin?
Talk:1994–95 United States network television schedule

message: Regarding the suggestion to merge 1994-95 United States network television schedule and 1994-1995 United States network television schedule:
* Support:   Inspection indicates they are almost the same content, with a handful of discrepancies.  The creation of two articles probably came about from inconsistencies in the year navigation boxes before widespread use of the template .  The one who merges should resolve the discrepancies and cite the resource used for research.  — EncMstr 03:41, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 1994-95 and 1994-1995 articles 

message: Ratings: September 19, 1994 to December 4, 1994    — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.148.24.188 (talk) 19:36, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  9/19/94 to 12/4/94 ratings
Talk:1993–94 United States network television schedule

message: Merge supported.  Same comments as at Talk:1994-95 United States network television schedule.  — EncMstr 03:45, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 
Talk:Crawford Boxes

message: A set of box seats is not notable themselves. It should be merged. DarkAudit 19:01, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this truly article worthy? 

message: They aren't "just" seats.  As it says in the article, they are the closest outfield seats to home plate in MLB.  They have earned a notability among players and fans that isn't common in baseball.  --Janus Shadowsong | contribs 17:16, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I vote that Crawford Boxes not be merged. I removed the merge tags since they have been there for about a month and there has not been very much discussion. If anyone is in disagreement, please replace the tags. Postoak 07:04, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: YES

message: Perhaps this should be merged with Minute Maid Park. Oldsanfelipe (talk) 16:06, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge candidate?
Talk:Rob & Big

message: Is the name Rob and Big or Rob & Big. I am pretty sure it is with the "&".
71.227.254.181 00:49, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: popups on the television appear to have an ampersand. // 3R1C 20:35, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: that girl was hot  hehe
indeed. Infraredeclipse 05:50, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  nutritionist 

message: The picture used for the show should be the family portraits. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Plankton5005 (talk • contribs) 04:51, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: will there be a season 2
I have Big Black as one of my top 8 freinds on myspace, and he posted a bulletin saying that a season 2 of Rob & Big was due to come out on June 1. Should I put this up? thanks, 65.75.85.125 03:42, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: season 2

message: I recall this article mentioning this show is pretty much a pure example of inline product placement with the DC shoes brand... So did MTV/DC Shoes come and remove that information? It was pretty fitting considering the number of times the show shows or mentions DC products.
The DC brand basicly made Rob who he is and allowed him to gain all his fame, he is sponsored by them so he obviously will have their wardrobe and objects throughout his house regardless if the show is there or not.
-- BrandonR 03:20, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who removed the section about Product Placement? 