lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Greenwich Street

message: This article currently states that Greenwich Street is "interrupted between Vesey and Liberty Streets by the former World Trade Center site", but according to 7 World Trade Center, the building was rebuilt "on a smaller footprint than the original to allow Greenwich Street to be restored from TriBeCa through the World Trade Center site and south to Battery Park".  Does the street now pass all the way through, or is it still interrupted? Ruyn (talk) 21:23, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think in these two pictures one can see the Greenwich Street how it looked like in 2006 
thumb|left|2006 from 7WTC direction souththumb|In Feb 2011 from Milennium Hotel direction west and in February 2011 at Ground Zero or the WTC-site. It is at the moment obviously not open to general (public) traffic but used as a builders access to the site. If I understand plans right after relocating the PATH station entrance from the Performing Arts Center site (where it is today) to the space between 2 WTC and 3 WTC the Performing Arts Center will be built and after that is terminated and 2 to 4 WTC are completed the street will be reinstalled in a way to be used by general public traffic. Unfortunately this is partly speculative (see WP:NOR) and therefore not suitable for a Wiki-article only in discussion it can be written this way. --PhChAK (talk) 22:18, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Interrupted or not

message: How do you pronounce it? The original Greenwich in London is pronounced "Grennitch". Is it the same in NYC? Cop 663 (talk) 18:17, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It is, but that's not a bad question... especially when you consider the way nearby Houston Street is pronounced... :) HMishkoff (talk) 02:44, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciation
Talk:Henry Street (Manhattan)

message: The "stub" on Henry Street in the East Side of Lower Manhattan has an incorrect statement.  Fanny Brice did not grow up on Henry Street.  She was born into a middle class Hungarian family that owned a chain of saloons in Newark, NJ.  She was not a child of the tenements as the Broadway show "Funny Girl" depicts. After her parents split up, her mother moved the family to various nice apartments and townhouses in Brooklyn where she was successful in real estate.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.137.128.43 (talk) 15:42, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Since the statement was unsourced anyway, I've removed it fromthe article. BMK (talk) 16:39, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Fanny Brice
Talk:Highbridge, Bronx

message: According to an 1867 map, the neighborhood was originally called "Higbridgeville." When was it changed? The history section should include this information. ---------User:DanTD (talk)  11:29, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Highbridgeville 
Talk:IBM New York Scientific Center

message: Thomas J. Watson Research Center says IBM started a lab in 1946 at W116 St, which is in the Inner City but not Downtown by New York City geographic conventions. With a hasty Google check, I find no hint at a Downtown location. My guess is, Morningside Heights is the place, but surely we have no basis for saying anything positive on that question. Seems to me, pending evidence, we should at least omit the word "downtown". Jim.henderson (talk) 01:24, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  When? Where?
Talk:LaGuardia Committee report

message: I recently created an article for the Indian Hemp Drugs Commission, this was a British study in 1893-1894 into the effects of cannabis usage in India. I think the above statement should be changed in this article and include a link to the new article for the 1894 study. any thoughts riffic (talk) 14:26, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "first in depth study into the effects of smoking marijuana" 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Already moved. Was moved without going through the RM process already by the person who opened the RM. (closed by non-admin page mover) Skarmory (talk • contribs) 22:01, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: LaGuardia Committee → ? – Place here your rationale for the proposed page name change, ideally referring to applicable naming convention policies and guidelines, and providing evidence in support where appropriate. If your reasoning includes search engine results, please prioritize searches limited to reliable sources (e.g. books, news, scholarly papers) over other web results. You don't need to add your signature at the end, as this template will do so automatically. deisenbe (talk) 18:41, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 27 August 2022
Talk:Longacre Square

message: Article title is Longacre; everywhere else in the article it's Long acre (lowercase) If it's two words, shouldn't it be Long Acre? Either way, was it one word or two? TheHYPO (talk) 02:13, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Far as I can tell, it was Long Acre in the early and middle 19th century, then became one word late in the century but before the Theater District moved up from the 30s.  Jim.henderson (talk) 02:41, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title?
Talk:Longwood, Bronx

message: "thousands of young men in New York City were regularly being killed on the streets over drug turf" sounds very much like an exaggeration and it has no source. I have replaced it with "many young men in New York City were killed on the streets over drug turf." I would not be opposed to someone reverting if a valid source can be provided. Dgndenver (talk) 18:15, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing unsupported assertion sounding like hyperbole
Talk:Golden Age of India

message: Nznsnanakd. D my daddy’s nice!!? 73.171.210.59 (talk) 18:38, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  H  tree hzhx 

message: Jjhok3nn3n3 27.63.180.223 (talk) 13:10, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Medihej 

message: I am removing the Vijayanagara Empire. This was a reginal empire and therefore can not be considered the "golden age" of India. There are not enough reliable sources to back it up. I am also considering removing the chola empire if consensus is reached. 
I am also adding back the Mughal empire as It was a significant empire and there is a good amount of reliable sources to back this up. This was recently removed by a Single-purpose IP. SKAG123 (talk) 03:17, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I really liked your decision on this notable topic. I have also some suggestions to add in this Article. Sur Empire is a notable empire under Sher Shah Suri whom conslidated most of North & Central India. Builted New Roads, Introduced new policies & currencies, they had most Advance Artillery. So I would like to Add that empire in this article. Hassan Gangu (talk) 20:56, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I would support adding this in the Mughal Empire section but not as a separate section. The Sur empire was too short lived and a regional power to be its own section in this article. SKAG123 (talk) 18:09, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit change
Talk:Manhattan loft

message: Merge because this page only vaguely details a very specific kind of loft about which more information is available on the page Loft. The only apparent differences between Manhattan lofts and regular lofts are that they are located in Manhattan and controlled by a set of laws. So by that reasoning, do we need articles for lofts in every district of every city? Brooklyn lofts, Queens lofts, what about Silverlake and Hollywood lofts in Los Angeles? -Lamarcus (talk) 20:25, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger Proposal
Talk:Marble Collegiate Church

message: We take it for granted that most, perhaps all, of the wood in the world's oldest building might be changed over the centuries, but the building stays in the same place, looks the same pretty much, and has some continuity.
 
Here we have an alleged continuity of different buildings with different names at different places, different congregations and different theologies.
 
The first sentence of the article claims refers to "The Marble Collegiate Church, founded in 1628..."  If that were not dishonest, then there would have been a Marble Collegiate Church somewhere in 1629.
 
There wasn't.
Could we say that some members of this church "jocularly claim that..."?
 
David Lloyd-Jones (talk) 09:41, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Oldest Continuous" Seems Bogus
Talk:Metropolitan Correctional Center, New York

message: I think that Viktor Bout would qualify. 
Gentleman wiki (talk) 08:15, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable Inmates 

message: The inmates listed in this section (with a few exceptions) were held at MCC New York for trial and were subsequently transferred to permanent facilities. Most, if not all, are now included in the articles for those facilities. Including them in this article seems redundant in my opinion. I'd like to replace them with notable inmates who are currenly being held at MCC New York.  I'd also like to add to the rest of the article. MDEVER802 (talk) 00:18, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable Inmates 

message: Someone inserted "murder" in the section for Jeff Epstein... While I understand it is still under investigation, we don't have a confirmation that he was actually murdered. Unless someone can find a source. Nusent 13:45, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Murder" of Epstein 

message: I am respectfully requesting that the MCC page be locked down temporarily as the entry about Michael Avenatti is being edited by trolls. I just deleted a reference to an alleged stalker, Carolyn Haynes. There was no reference for this allegation. In fact, Carolyn Haynes is a supporter of Mr. Avenatti and has experienced tremendous harassment online for her support. The action by the these trolls in altering the entry amounts to defamation of Ms. Haynes. Mr. Avenatti's personal page has already been locked down.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Megan2c2b (talk • contribs) 03:21, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable Inmates - Michael Avenatti
Talk:Andrew Dasburg

message: If 12 internal links, and an obituary in the New York Times doesn't make you notable, what does?
*Uh... see WP:BIO... Some guy 07:12, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Did you even read WP:BIO? And please skip the sarcasm. Don't just point to a guideline without reading it yourself. It says: "Not explaining notability; If an article does not explain notability, try to improve it by: Rewriting it yourself [or] asking the article's editor(s) for advice." --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 20:44, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I just uploaded Improvisation, which is in the public domain; the article really needs a New Mexico piece; I'll leave it to some other editor who might know what the best PD New Mexico painting of his was.  Tempshill 19:09, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images needed 
Talk:New Amsterdam Musical Association

message: Looking forward to your visit. Monday Night Jazz Jam and Open Mic happens from 7 pm to 11 pm Every Monday Night.
Harlem Late Night Jazz happens Every Wednesday Night 8 pm to 12 midnight.
Small donation is requested.
See you there. 71.190.53.44 (talk) 04:13, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  NAMA LEGENDS monthly program on  Saturday evening telling and sharing the New Amsterdam Musical Association NAMA HARLEM story.
Talk:New England Society of New York

message: A well-meaning intern from the Society's marketing department has been editing the article. User:Marketingnes has been blocked as a username violation, and her edits reverted; but the article does obviously need a lot of work. NPOV and sourcing are clearly problems here. --Orange Mike | Talk 19:57, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Changing the article title to New England Society would work as well. New England Society is the abbreviation most commonly used by the organization, with the full correct name being New England Society in the City of New York. The current title has never been used by the organization as an official name or an abbreviation. 96.224.42.110 (talk) 18:39, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI and other problems 
Talk:New Utrecht, Brooklyn

message: The third sentence of this article ends with "... began purchasing land from the Canarsee and Nyack tribes." However, to the best I can determine, there weren't ever a tribe of Native Americans in that area who went by the name "Nyack". That link just leads to a DAB page, which points to the village of Nyack, New York, among other things. The Wikipedia page for the village has a vague reference to the name being of Native American origin, but nothing specific. According to a few other webpages I found, it was indeed a Native American name, but a place name, not a name of a tribe. For example: 
http://www.nyackvillager.com/NyackMean.htm  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gabefarkas (talk • contribs) 14:21, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pretty sure there weren't any "Nyack tribe" of Native Americans
Talk:New York City Department of Sanitation

message: I've merged New York City Department of Sanitation Police into the organization section, but really the whole organization section needs to be either rewritten based on a reliable source, or removed. As it stands it's confusing and unverifiable, and probably outdated. -Apocheir (talk) 20:38, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Organization
Talk:Tiki Taane

message: This article is about an influential New Zealand musician and former front man of one of New Zealand's leading bands Salmonella Dub.
I have removed the speedy deletion tag.  This is an article about a legitimate musician who has formed a major part of the band Salmonella Dub and has now released a solo album.  Kiwipaul 11:31, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with Kiwipaul. Salmonella Dub are very clearly notable - New Zealand's leading band in their genre - and they have toured Europe twice. So when their lead singer goes solo, that is equally notable. dramatic 08:38, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

text: agreed, very notable. Mention the name Tiki to almost ANY New Zealander and they'll know who you're talking about. 124.168.25.170 (talk) 00:53, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: This article appears biased against police. It only gives Tiki's point of view, nothing from police or other witnesses that were there. I'm not confident I can update the page given my lack of experience with Wikipedia, it is sure to generate a bit of controversy. But I think it is important to maintain Wikipedia's neutral standpoint, something that is lacking in this article at the moment. See http://entertainment.msn.co.nz/article.aspx?id=8245818 for quotes from Tiki saying how he "loves the police" and is not mad at them. See http://tvnz.co.nz/entertainment-news/police-defend-arrest-tiki-taane-4115672 for senior police supporting the actions of the arresting officer, saying that he was confident his staff acted professionally and appropriately.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.189.201.34 (talk) 01:34, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  2011 Arrest 

message: This might be a reliable source:
http://www.muzic.net.nz/artists/2216.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.73.22.113 (talk) 06:50, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age and Birthday not found? 

message: Under the heading "Legal issues", it states "He sang the song 'Fuck tha police' at a gig in Tauranga, claiming he was singing lyrics from N.W.A's 'Fuck tha Police'." Obviously, the redundancy ought to be removed. Bricology (talk) 22:15, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redundancy in sentence needs correction 

message: Taane expressed vocal and online support for the 2022 protests against the New Zealand Covid-19 mandates and expressed support for the large protest encampment outside Parliament, shouldn't this be listed in some way, perhaps under a heading like political/conspiracy views? He is listed as a supporter on the associated pages for said protests, so presumably those pages have citations of when he was quoted as saying so.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2404:440E:2775:B500:5076:4C69:215C:254A (talk) 06:21, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  2022 Anti-Mandate protests
Talk:New York City Economic Development Corporation

message: This article seems to be written like a press release from the NYCEDC and needs a substantial rewrite. Some content is informational, but it's pretty much an endorsement. --JDCMAN (talk) 13:40, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: POV check

message: Could someone run a spellcheck on this article? Seriously, the lead sentence has a misspelling: abbriviated. Symplectic Map (talk) 02:59, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Spellcheck

message: Please contact the Marketing Department at NYCEDC in regards to editing rights for this page.  Aho nycedc (talk) 18:26, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: See Wikipedia:Ownership of articles for original owner.  Jim.henderson (talk) 18:11, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Important Message

message: This was removed, and I can see why as it does not add substantively to the article.  Putting it here in case something changes, such as Thiede getting an article or this division becoming recognized for some reason. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 03:46, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relatively minor piece of governance content removed
Talk:New York University Press

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20130512153026/http://nyupress.org/about/history.aspx. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  GermanJoe (talk) 19:53, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:NoHo, Manhattan

message: There doesn't seem to be any indication that http://www.nohomanhattan.org/ is the official site of any business association, historical society, conservancy or anything else other than some anonymous person's self-published fan site. Can anyone find any identifying information on it? I've looked through the site and can find no name or group attached to it. If it's just some SPS, then it's not WP:RS. I would imagine that anything it's citing could be cited with a more authoritative source. --Tenebrae (talk) 18:57, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Self-published fan site?

message: The "Location in New York City" box on the article page only points to water.
Taxodermist (talk) 08:29, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  GPS Location is wrong
Talk:North Bronx

message: The South Bronx has a reason for existence. A well known poverty pocket. The North Bronx however is not in common usage even locally. The neighborhoods in the northern half of the borough are very different economically, racially, and structurally. It's like creating articles for North New York City, South New York City, East New York City, West New York City. They are not grouped together, people use neighborhoods and streets. Yes if someone lives in Wakefield they will say they live in the North Bronx but only becuase it is in the northern half of the borough. Not to group it with Riverdale or Norwood. Completely different areas.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikiwiki718 (talk • contribs) 01:25, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've always heard it used. Not that this is evidence, but it would need afd to see what the consensus is.DGG (talk) 01:38, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes it is true that it is used, sometimes. For example someone living in Riverdale might say, "I live in Riverdale located in the North Bronx". However people will use streets first, neighborhoods second and lastly and much less often "North Bronx" in addition to the area or street. Also the North Bronx only represents a handful of neighborhoods. The South Bronx in comparison is an internationally known symbol of urban decay and extends today far beyond the original boundaries. Someone who lives in Mott Haven will not even say Mott Haven, they will simply reply by their street or South Bronx. The North Bronx should not be used to counter the South Bronx. Throgs Neck, Pelham Parkway, Country Club, ect, these areas are not located in the North Bronx. The North Bronx also has limited similarities unlike the South Bronx. The entire South Bronx can be generalized as low income, dense, Hispanic and Black. The only similarity between the three regions which make up the North Bronx is location in the northern edge of the borough. Wakefield is a lower income working class Black neighborhood, primarily consisting of multi family homes and some tenement buildings. Riverdale is an affluent White neighborhood, primarily consisting of single family homes, and some apartment buildings. Norwood is now a lower income working class Hispanic neighborhood, primarily consisting of multi family homes and many tenement buildings. See what I mean, kind of? Haha. Anyway yes I would like to see what others think. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikiwiki718 (talk • contribs) 03:49, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reason for deletion proposal
Talk:North Corona, Queens

message: No such thing as north corona, only way to say north corona is geographically. Theres no distinct neighborhood known as "North Corona".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.83.120.99 (talk) 18:22, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  .... 

message: This location already has a name: East Elmhurst.  Admittedly, East Elmhurst is not east of Elmhurst but northeast of Elmhurst.
::According to GSV, North Corona is south of East Elmhurst, east of Jackson Heights and north of the LIRR Port Washington Branch. Perhaps "North Corona" can be reestablished as a sub-section of the existing Corona, Queens article, like various segments of Flushing, Queens (Broadway-Flushing, Murray Hill, Queens, Queensboro Hill, Queens, etcetera), Long Island City (Hunters Point, Queens, Dutch Kills, Queens, Blissville, Queens), and others. ---------User:DanTD (talk)  16:49, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong term; use instead, East Elmhurst
Talk:Opportunity NYC

message: Since this project officially ended on August 31st, 2010, it is critically important to post the initial results of the program, and the data from the research done by the MDRC that covers the first two years of the program is out and should be referenced in this article.  I propose to add a new section titled “Lessons Learned from Opportunity NYC” and cite the MDRC data.  As new data comes out for the third and final year of the program, I hope to update the site again.Sbh2 (talk) 03:49, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled