lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Randy Newman's Faust

message: The article is unclear as to whether the performers on the album (Ronstadt, Elton John, etc) ever performed the play live, or if they were strictly hired for the album. 70.73.90.119 (talk) 21:41, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: A bit of clarity needed
Talk:Popular Favorites 1976–1992: Sand in the Vaseline

message: The following sentence was added to the article today:
:The "Sand in the Vaseline" on the album cover is by Ed Ruscha, and is made of equalized egg yolk.
It isn't clear what that means. What is by Ed Ruscha? The words? The image? Likewise, what is made of equalized egg yolk? — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 00:47, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  New addition
Talk:Blue Room (The Orb song)

message: Perhaps it was just a local thing, but in the eastern USA in the early 1990s I went to a few different raves where the chill-out room was explicitly named "the blue room" and/or painted blue. - 128.220.160.2 (talk) 20:44, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: connection to Chill-Out Rooms?

message: Is the waa-ah-wa-ah-wah-ooh-wah-wah vocal sampled directly from Krush's "House Arrest (Precinct mix)" or was there an earlier source? -Q4 09:06, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of U.S. states and their state flower, tree, and bird/Archive 1

message: This is a great concept for an article, I like it. Good job, GHe! --Kitty the Random 01:21, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your feedback. Now I know that I'm at least on the right track. :) G.He 01:58, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

message: I'm planning to use add pictures to depict some of the items on the list (definitely not all of them...). The categories should be alternating (I.e. flower, tree, bird, flower, tree, bird, etc...). If anyone has good suggestions for good pictures, please post it on this page. Then, the best images can be chosen for the article. G.He 02:03, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Already added some pics, more may be included. G.He 00:53, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 

message: This is just a note to editors: Please do not put the  tag or overcategorize the article yet as it is currently half-done and hasn't been revised... It would look really bad if a large audience visited it right now... Once it's ready for the general public (or at least decent enough (I.e. ~>75% done)), then the tags should go on. G.He 03:54, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Or should we state that it's currently under construction should we tag it now? G.He 03:58, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note 

message: I recently added flags to the states, and if anyone can give me some feedback, I'd appreciate it. G.He 00:53, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flags 

message: Does anyone think that this list will ever make featured status? G.He 03:23, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nominated... Now that's left is to wait... G.He 01:49, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  
Featured List?
Talk:Displacement map

message: "A displacement map is a mesh of polygons that makes up part of the environment in a 3D game engine." doesn't seem right to me.
A displacement map isn't the result, but the two-dimensional image used in the process. A more accurate sentence would be "A Displacement Map is a two-dimensional image use in the process of Displacement Mapping that is applied to a surfaces normal plane to extrude and deform it, used mainly in Terrain visualisation."
Also, "The term came into use in reference to its application in the source engine" is completely false, as the terms been in common use for nearly ten years. --Mincetro 01:22, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:The Complete Live at the Plugged Nickel 1965

message: Someone has deleted the article on the Plugged Nickel nightclub, further erasing the cultural heritage of jazz in the United States. The nightclub was in the Old Town section of Chicago, and existed from 1962 to 1970. The following is a source, and a comment leads to a Chicago Tribune article, Aug. 27, 1972, "The Brown Shoe found a shoe that fits," stating that it closed in February 1970. http://plugged-nickel.blogspot.com/ Dogru144 (talk) 15:04, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Regarding the nightclub
Talk:List of military corps by name

message: A list of military corps ... but for what military? - IstvanWolf 01:29, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: How should one say the name of a corps.  Is III Corps said as "third corps.", "corps three", or "three Corps."?  
If you see a unit named "the 164th" is that usually a regement?
Phagebob (talk) 01:42, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  How to say the names of corps, regements, etc.
Talk:Gerolamo Sersale

message: This sentence makes no sense:
"The map's existence is known only through being mentioned in Riccioli's Almagestum novum, but today it can be seen in the Naval Observatory of San Fernando in Cadiz, Spain."  Too Old 01:34, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Hugh Mercer

message: This article needs to be shortened and condensed in encylopedic fashion.Scott Mingus 01:36, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I discovered it while wiki-wandering today and removed a lot of hagiographic, irrelevant, and redundant content. I'll put it on my desk in the "needs sources" pile. KrakatoaKatie 00:10, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 
Talk:River Heights, Winnipeg

message: For the second time I have deleted the reference to a concentrated Mennonite population in River Heights. According to the 2001 census, Mennonites comprised 2.2% of the population of River Heights, compared to 2.6% for Winnipeg overall. This can not be claimed to be a concentrated population. Conversely, the area was 10.9% Jewish compared to 2.1% for Winnipeg as a whole so this is evidence of concentration. I think the writer continues to insert this a method of self-promotion of a particular religion which has no place in an encyclopedia.--207.161.47.175 01:36, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mennonites

message: I find the phrase "Wellington Crescent, as it is known to many in Winnipeg..." odd because Wellington Crescent is the name of a street, not just a name locals use.  The perception of affluence applies to the full length of the street, and not to streets that are nearby, or even a block away.  But I'm unfamilliar with wikiformat, and thought there might be a reason for it, so I'm too shy to edit.--207.161.45.138 11:39, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wellington

message: As per WP:CANSTYLE#Neighbourhoods, this article should be moved to River Heights, Winnipeg.  In accordance with the guideline, however, the move is first being raised on the talk page. Skeezix1000 (talk) 16:54, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed page move

message: In my High School history classes (at Kelvin in the 1980s) and that 1919 Strike bus tour in the 1990s, they never stated that River Heights residents were part of the Committee of 1000, an anti-union conservative group. No, it was mainly the shop/business owners who lived on Wellington Crescent who were.? I am asking citation for this piece:
River Heights, along with West Fort Rouge, comprised the South End of the old City of Winnipeg. It was these areas which contributed the majority of the men and the money to form the Citizens Committee of 1000, the group which broke the Winnipeg General Strike of 1919.
Jimj wpg (talk) 04:03, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: River Heights Residents Involvement In Committee of 1000

message: Stats. Canada has an East and West River Heights, but anyone who lives here knows that we don't refer to the areas as such. The article says there are 70,000 living in River Heights, but that figure includes residents esat of Cambridge St. which is Grant Park and Rockwood areas. The total I got just including "West River Heights" is 18,995 (as at 2016). So I created a wikitable to show just the 6 sub-neighbourhoods that are truly considered as River Heights to locals - North, Central, South,Sir John Franklin, J.B. Mitchell, and Mathers. Discovered the "Map" function in in MediaWiki editor, but I wish it had a colouring feature so that I could show the boundaries of R.H. in Red, similar to the Infobox of the Etobicoke, Ontario article. Jimj wpg (talk) 03:49, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: River Heights Boundaries
Talk:List of Tintin media

message: I've removed the reference to "Tintin in Fallujah" reference until this claim can be corroborated. Submitter claimed this parody appeared in the November 2004 installment of Mad Magazine. --KihOshk 01:42, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Tintin in Fallujah

message: Someone please create a game page for this, so it doesn't just link back to the Tintin main page
--Jon God 1:45 AM September 2006 (UTC)
:I've removed the link that redirects to the Tintin main page, as it's confusing. Cheers, Jacklee 19:57, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The Many Adventures of Tintin

message: I propose that the article "List of books about Tintin" be merged into this article. There seems little purpose in spreading the information over two articles that are so similar in content. You may want to indicate whether you support or reject this proposal below, and discuss the matter further. If enough editors support the proposal, any editor may go ahead and carry out the merger. Cheers, Jacklee 22:37, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal

message: …it’s odd that the Eagle version of King Ottokar’s Sceptre is stuck in “Reprints and Republications”, when it is both a unique translation, and the first English publication of this story, and therefore isn’t either a reprint or a republication any more than any of the other books… 88.109.4.98 (talk) 23:04, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Publication order…
Talk:Benevento/Russo Duo

message: Someone not only wrote some nonsense, but did it so that his vandalism isn't editable. 
In the 'History' section, some jackass wrote this:
"It is also apparent that Benevento has almost no grasp on the concept of melody. "
Whoever took the time to write that line AND make it difficult to remove must be jealous that this guy is getting attention in the NY jazz scene.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.167.40.130 (talk) 22:15, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Idiotic Vandalism
Talk:Overland Limited (ATSF train)

message: I do not understand why you removed the date the train ended and the equipment used on the train?  Tomas417 01:48, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Most (if not all) of the added information refers to the Union Pacific train Overland Flyer and not the Santa Fe train Overland Limited, which is the subject of this article.--Lordkinbote 04:07, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

message: I can't find mention of this train in the January 1904 Official Guide. Trains 7/8 are the California & Mexico Express and the Chicago Express, respectively. Lucius Beebe mentions the Overland Limited once in his book about the UP train but doesn't give dates. I have Duke in front of me but can't find a mention of this train. Searches in newspapers.com reveal much discussion of an Overland Express going back to the early 1890s. Honestly, my inclination at this point is to delete this article outright until someone finds proper sources and do the subject justice. Mackensen (talk) 22:33, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problems 

message: In general I don't like hat notes that wrap over multiple lines:
This article is about the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway. For the train jointly-operated by the Chicago and North Western, the Southern Pacific, and the Union Pacific, see Overland Limited (UP train). For limited corporations known as "Overland", see Overland (disambiguation).
This is my preferred version:
For the train jointly-operated by the Chicago and North Western, the Southern Pacific, and the Union Pacific, see Overland Limited (UP train).
I think it's unlikely that someone arrives here looking for a limited corporation named Overland. There are none listed by that name on Overland (the actual dab page). Typically we only dab on a likely search term. I'm open to having my mind changed, though. Mackensen (talk) 12:00, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: If someone is looking for a company named "Overland" and knows that it is a company, and that they themselves refer to it as "Overland", it would not be unreasonable for them to try "overland limited", "overland company", "overland corporation", "overland inc" etc as search terms, therefore the hatnote should include that possibility. -- 70.51.46.146 (talk) 03:46, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I suppose, but it seems pretty unlikely. Mackensen (talk) 13:15, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hat note
Talk:Academy Road (Winnipeg)

message: Updated to correct historical inaccuracy and add additional information. Academy Road was never named Broadway, and Broadway predates Academy Road by many, many, years. The streetcar that serviced Academy Road was called the "Broadway" car into the 1930s, because it ran along Broadway to Sherbrook Street and then down to the Maryland Bridge. The Street is named after St.Mary's Academy.--207.161.47.175 01:52, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Academy Rd. Inaccuracies
Template talk:Watergate

message: Maybe I just don't get it, but how do the Pentagon Papers and Watergate connect? They're really two separate events, right? 24.118.229.252 02:00, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Pentagon Papers belong?

message: What is he doing in this template. He barely is connected to Watergate (through the Pentagon papers, which is under dispute). And he not mentioned in the main article either. MDfoo 01:40, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Gravel doesn't belong at all - Watergate isn't even mentioned in the Gravel article, which discusses everything Gravel ever did.  There are some Gravel nuts in Wikipedia, and this addition must have been their work.  I've removed it.  Wasted Time R 16:15, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Mike Gravel

message: I added Angelo Lano, the FBI agent who headed the investigation in Washington. Hope that's ok. SGGH speak! 16:30, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Angelo Lano]]

message: I added L. Patrick Gray, since he was the head of the FBI at the time and the first one to reveal the White House's involvement in the investigation. (Morethan3words (talk) 09:36, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[L. Patrick Gray]]

message: Wasn't Liddy with the Committee to Re-Elect, rather than the White House? john k (talk) 15:50, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Liddy 

message: I added Hugh W. Sloan, Jr., treasurer of CRP.  Sephiroth9611 (talk) 16:43, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Hugh W. Sloan, Jr.]]
Talk:South Pennsylvania Railroad

message: "This article or section seems not to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia entry," warns the tag at the top of this entry. Read the entry again. Does it not read like a good story? The tales of the robber barons in the mid-to-late 1800s are stories indeed, filled with great characters, conflicts, and machinations. A dry, formal tone will do nothing to tell the story appropriately. I suggest that those concerned about a more "formal tone" turn their attentions to the 93% of Wikipedia that's pure garbage. --Captadam 02:06, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: To split hairs, the Pa. Turnpike only used 5-1/2 of the uncompleted railroad tunnels.  The turnpike's Allegheny Tunnel is completely new, just South of the uncompleted railroad tunnel.  The East end of the turnpike's Laurel Hill Tunnel is new, South Penn didn't do much digging here, possibly because of a waterfall where they wanted to put the portal.  The turnpike tunnel is shorter than the intended length of the railroad tunnel.
Negro Mtn., near Mile post 116, and Quemehoning, near Mile post 107, both on the North or Westbound side of the pike, are the other railroad tunnels not used by the turnpike.  Quemehoning was eventually completed as single track by a short line logging railroad. JimBoylan 23:00, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  South Penn Tunnels 

message: I'm copying below a question posed to me in my talk page, with my response. It's a good question. Thoughts? --Captadam 02:05, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What's with the "first" and "second" distinction? It was the exact same company, just under new management. Choess 01:03, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well ... not really. Vanderbilt's group picked up an unused charter and used it for an entirely different project. The fictitious person entity might have been the same, but everything surrounding it--backers, financiers, right-of-way, history--were different. Anyway, I was just trying to figure out a way to differentiate between the two because they had entirely different histories. "First" and "second" might not have been the best choice ... perhaps a better solution will arise. --Captadam 02:03, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "First" and "Second?"

message: ; it goes through to page 621. --NE2 16:41, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some more history 

message: Is there some reason Harwood's "The Railroad That Never Was: Vanderbilt, Morgan, and the South Pennsylvania Railroad" is not listed as a reference?
Skranish (talk) 19:50, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:Osman I

message: Current ref [106]  is used 4 times at Osman_I#Sons. Per  we should have a better source. I'm not sure how "actual" these graves are. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 08:58, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  www.seyyahcelebi.com.tr 

message: For the interested. Looking to improve the HH article with usable sources. Please join at Talk:Halime_Hatun#"Some_recent(when?)_legends_described_her_as_the_mother_of_Osman_I;(citation_needed)". Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:10, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Halime Hatun discussion 

message: In Osman's dream section, THE HOLY MAN SAYS "My daughter BALA/RABIA"
 not Malhun 91.93.68.132 (talk) 16:57, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 13:39, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 5 February 2023 

message: Of the images on the page, I think this one is the better choice. It's much older than the current 18th century one, and I have some vague hope that the artist may have had a better idea what a 14th century Ottoman sultan looked like. Any objections? Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 18:15, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, however this article drastically changed after paper(?). Beshogur (talk) 19:37, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not familiar with wikiversity, but I assume "public peer review." is meant as a mark of quality. No daughter of Osman mentioned there, I see. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 20:50, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:LEADIMAGE]]
Talk:South Carolina Aquarium

message: It would informative to have a section dealing with the financial history of the aquarium in this article.
--Tokalon73 02:10, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Financial history?

message: Downgrading (C to start). This article doesn't have a huge amount of text, and only has 3 refs. It's still a start. Don Lammers (talk) 23:45, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:Mario Cipollini

message: Cipollini is known as the "lion king" because the winner of each stage in the tour de france gets a stuffed lion. i can't actually find that published anywhere to footnote or include it, any help would be great.
re: the Credit Lyonnais stuffed lions, the GC leader on each day also receives a lion...  Armstrong has been given something like 75 or 80 of them, last year in an interview he said that he gives them away to the children of teammates and postal/discovery channel support staff.  Thewalrus 04:08, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why did he never win a maillot vert despite being "the best sprinter of his generation"?67.169.183.243 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 17:23, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Best sprinter?
Talk:Knowledge-based processor

message: I have un-WP:PRODded this. The article is badly written but unfortunately this piece of marketing jargon gets 36,000+ Google hits, so, although it's a foolish term, I think we should cover it. Sigh. --unforgettableid | talk to me 02:14, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

message: AFAICT the page is not a copyvio of anything, but it still has problems.
* Needs to be wikified
* Needs to be split into sections
* Needs references
Cheers, --unforgettableid | talk to me 02:17, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problems with article
Talk:Antiviral Therapy (journal)

message: Please specify what clean up is required, and I'll attempt to comply. Thanks. Espresso Addict
-Red links +Blue links (3ucky(3all 02:28, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. I've removed a few links, and hope to complete pages on the other non-existent links when I get time. Espresso Addict 03:46, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Nieuport

message: Thanks, folks, for your work on the Nieuport article - this article needs some work - especially, someone needs to do through with a few good sources and confirm a lot of the facts therin with references! See the Nieuprt 11 article for an example!!!
I have reverted a few recent changes - people may want to discuss this.
1. The weakness of the "V" strut arrangement was evident from the very first - not something that came with "heavier and more powerful developments". In fact it was perhaps the fighter type aerobatics required by the little N.11 that made it a real problem.
2. The Nieuport 28 had a radically different fuselage to that of the early Nieuports - among other things it was much more streamlines and narrower. It remained subject to structural problems, however due to a very light structure.
3. The Nieuport fighters remained very well known (NOT obscure) even after they were no longer used on operations, as they made excellent advanced trainers. The U.S. services, for instance, bought hundreds of "V" strut Nieuports for that very purpose. If the surplus "28s" had not been acquired for the American fighter squadrons they would have undoubtedly joined the old Nieuport types at training stations.
If I have inadvertedntly reverted some good edits that supplyed new, relevant, and accurate information, then please get on to me. 
--Soundofmusicals (talk) 23:22, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent changes 

message: Hi, folks -
I recently helped a new editor upload some photographs in her possession, depicting her grandfather's Nieuport around 1909 or 1911.  She is not sure which model of Nieuport it is and I am not an aircraft expert.  The photos in question are:
* :File:Nieuport_Monoplane_Ernest_Anderson.jpg
* :File:Nieuport_Monoplane_Ernest_Anderson_2.jpg
From examining other photographs online I suspect it is a Nieuport 4G but am not sure.  Comments? Tim Pierce (talk) 04:03, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Followup - the body and tail look more like a 4G than any other model, but there appears to be only room for a single pilot, which seems like it might rule out that model.  Any ideas? Tim Pierce (talk) 19:38, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Both photos are in the "gallery" section of the article - can't guarantee that the identifications there are 100% accurate.--Soundofmusicals (talk) 23:27, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I am quite sure that the identifications there are not 100% accurate, since I am the one who uploaded the photos, captioned them and added them to the gallery. :-)  My identification is just a guess.  I'm hoping someone here is better at distinguishing between different models of Nieuport by sight. Tim Pierce (talk) 02:03, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Identify these Nieuport photos? 
Talk:Nieuport 11

message: The Nieuport 11 is a replica of Michele Allasia aircraft. 80a squadriglia, italian front.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.37.119.87 (talk) 23:41, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note on replica 

message: was this plane first flown in 1915 or 1916? Treshcen (talk) 23:00, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: 1915. - NiD.29 (talk) 18:18, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  what year for category