lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/List of Christian entertainers

message: I'm confused here. How does this work simple majority, three-fifth majority, what? I heard someone say it's between 60% to 66%, but the delete votes here seem to be 7 out of 13. Delete to keep seems to be 7 to 4, which is 63.63% majority. Is that it?--T. Anthony 07:45, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It's called reaching a consensus. -- Dalbury(Talk) 12:16, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Gotcha. Actually I sort of looked up more on the process afterward to get a better sense of it.--T. Anthony 00:51, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

text: I don't see the consensus here. -- JJay 09:57, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I just didn't want to be disagreeable. I got some flack on defending religion related lists, but in hindsight I guess it was mostly respectful flack.--T. Anthony 12:54, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Also you can maybe renew a topic like this. Possibly something like List of Christian entertainment people. Then limit it to Christians who say have been in Christian themed films. Like Kirk Cameron or James Caviezel.--T. Anthony 12:57, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Which I just created. It's made difficult though because although there is a LDS cinema article there is no Catholic cinema or Christian cinema articles. I'd prefer the list not be too LDS-centric.(I count them as Christian, but I doubt they are in anyway the main purveyors of Christian-oriented films)--T. Anthony 07:43, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Deep Cover (song)

message: I escaped the characters "-->" from the line *Music Video Database --> Dr. Dre as these characters are html code for ending a comment. It seemed to be the intent of the original editor to have "-->" represent an actual arrow and be included as part of the external link, as in
Music Video Database--> Dr. Dre.
Please correct me if I was mistaken.
Zachara 07:56, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

message: We want to know 2600:1700:7463:A3A0:E83D:431E:3A96:A74D (talk) 10:32, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is SNOOP DOG REALLY DEAD OR NOT
Talk:Decibully

message: This article is poorly formatted, reads like a review, and is biased.  It needs citations of factual information rather than editorial commentary and descriptive prose.  I may have cleanup-tagged it using the incorrect technique, but it needs work regardless.  -- user:phreyan 10 November 19:39PM
: Actually, it isn't an article, but word-for-word their Myspace page "About Me" section.--208.44.234.50 22:19, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean-up
Talk:Sturm, Ruger & Co.

message: Why does this page say Ruger is the largest American Manufacturer of firearms, when the Smith and Wesson page makes this claim as well?
-- probably that claim should be verified or removed Arthurrh 22:49, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Largest

message: I'm not sure why the "controversy" section is listed to prominently - shouldn't it come much later in the article? Is it really the most important thing about the company? Arthurrh 22:49, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversy

message: it is the only major gun company to be publicly traded. smith and wesson is privately held.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Krasilschic (talk • contribs) 20:58, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: By a holding corporation: (). I think this classfies as being publically traded. --Boris Barowski (talk) 13:59, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  publicly traded 

message: "which became so successful " 
"Ruger is a dominant player in the .22 rimfire rifle market in the U.S. with its Ruger 10/22. The 10/22 is popular due to being relatively inexpensive and of good quality as well as the wealth of aftermarket accessories and parts available for it."
PollyPollyPeptide (talk) 23:47, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: None of this is peacock language...what do you think is wrong with this wording?⋙–Berean–Hunter—► ((⊕)) 23:53, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: advertising and peacock language

message: Should this article belong at Sturm, Ruger & Co. instead? The title as it stands sounds odd. Compare Tiffany & Co. for instance. I don't think there is a special characters reason to avoid that title. --Rifleman 82 (talk) 17:30, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I would support a change, please don't blank the talk page though.--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 17:35, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

text: No prob, I kind of figured it was an honest mistake.--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 17:49, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title 

message: Considering that the 10/22 is arguably one of their most important products, I think a picture should be included on this page.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Belac Athanasius (talk • contribs) 14:48, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture of a 10/22 

message: The current title (Sturm, Ruger & Co. is missing a comma (after co.) as well as the Inc. portion of the title. These two aspects are essential as they represent the correct name for the company. This is the name the company is publicly traded as, and is represented as on Ruger's website (http://www.ruger.com).
:Fixed!--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 23:20, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: There ought to be a "Politics" section in this article - actually, in all the major manufacturer's articles - to cover its efforts to influence gun laws. Here are some sources:
*
*
*
I'm still collecting others.
--Lightbreather (talk) 18:58, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Politics section
Talk:USS Cowpens (CVL-25)

message: "Mrs. M. H. Spruance (daughter of Vice Admiral William F. Halsey)"? Did somebody make a mistake, here? Was she his daughter-in-law? Or did she marrry Ray Spruance's son? Or what?  Trekphiler 08:27, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Huh?

message: Admiral Halsey's daughter married Admiral Spruance's son.147.240.16.52 22:32, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Halsey and Spruance
Talk:Cowpens

message: Cowpens was also the name of a RN engineer who designed a pintle-type mount for a variety of naval barbette around 1870, which was later superceded by Ericsson-type turrets (which actually aren't turrets, stricly speaking...).  Trekphiler 08:30, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Withdrawn. bd2412 T 04:07, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Cowpens →  – Per WP:PLURALPT. I see nothing on this page to dissuade me from thinking that the clear primary topic of the term is the singular, Cowpen. bd2412 T 22:06, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move
Talk:Marion Mahony Griffin

message: * architecture.com.au — Preceding unsigned comment added by Martyman  (talk • contribs) 4 December 2005
Statement that Marion was influenced by her cousin...how? to do, or not do, what, exactly? Elucidate or delete, I should think. Will try to research later. Beadmatrix (talk) 12:53, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Useful Reference 

message: So, there is Not One Word about any children of the Griffins, or the lack of any children? This seems to be a necessity for the biographies of any two noted people who were married to each other. 
If you can verify it, the simple statement, "Mr. and Mrs. Griffin never had any children," would suffice.
Just like Sir Isaac Newton never had any known children.
98.67.160.211 (talk) 18:33, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Marion Mahony was 40 years old when she married Griffin.  I'm not sure that a "no children" statement is that needed.  Carptrash (talk) 19:57, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  No children ?? 

message: — Assignment last updated by YukiSquirrel (talk) 20:51, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Women in American History
Talk:Pennsylvania State University Commonwealth campuses

message: In and of itself, this page needs to be added to. Suto 19:11, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: I think this is an accurate statement, but I want to check it first:
The Pennsylvania State University Commonwealth Campus system was created by Penn State during the Great Depression of the 1930s in order to ensure that a (quality) Penn State education be avialable locally to residents of the Commonwealth. Rob 21:29, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rationale behind branch campuses 

message: Penn State Live has a site that has reprints from Intercom, the Penn State's faculty/staff newspaper, about branch campuses. Sorry if this is a repeat for anyone. Rob 22:05, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to Commonwealth Campus articles 

message: delete if you want, but it doesn't make it true
:I think everybody would agree that they would like information about Penn State to be correct. So what is the new name of the Commonwealth Education System? What do you call a Penn State campus that is not University Park? Many sites in the psu.edu domain call them Commonwealth Campuses. 
:If you know of the official name of "this group". please supply a reference. Rob 07:49, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  this group does still not exist with this name 

message: Commonwealth Campuses may now be known as the Penn State Network, although I'm not sure when that name came into being. I checked the latest Faculty Staff directory, and the entry for Commonwealth Campuses directs you to the map of the Penn State Network. I can't find any references about the network of campuses on the net though. Rob 13:30, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Penn State Network 

message: It would be useful to say which campuses have college status, and which are part of University College. I assume from their names that Harrisburg and Erie have college status, but what are the other three? john k (talk) 21:42, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  University College 

message: On my display, the dots for both Erie and Brandywine are outside the state boundaries, do we have Lat/Long for the campuses and can we calculate the correctly?Naraht (talk) 15:09, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map: Erie and Brandywine 

message: As pointed out by others, this article could greatly use a new map featuring the locations of the commonwealth campuses. Steps to do it can be found here: Template:Location map/Creating a new map definition. See also: Wikipedia:WikiProject Maps --Hoyadonis (talk) 20:39, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Making new Commonwealth Campus map
Talk:Pascendi Dominici gregis

message: Pascendi analyzes Modernism in excruciating detail, but the oath was not prescribed by it, but by a latter document. See Roman Modernism. Regards. WikiSceptic 08:44, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, you're quite correct. The oath wasn't promulgated till 1910 with the Motu Proprio "Sacrorum antistitum". I've deleted this bit. Alan162 (talk) 23:01, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion
Talk:Mike Judge

message: I'm going to start fixing it but I just wanted to point it out. Here is the iThenticate report. βӪᑸᙥӴ • Talk • Contribs 16:55, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  CopyVio 

message: Under Mike Judge's Career section, in "2014–present:" the last sentence should be updated to reflect HBO's recent decision to scrap the 2 projects they were working on with Judge.
 Example update below for the last paragraph:
"On January 12, 2017, Deadline confirmed that Cinemax ordered 8 episodes of Judge's new animated series, Mike Judge Presents: Tales from the Tour Bus. The series premiered on September 22, 2017.[60] In 2019, he announced to have been developing two projects for HBO: QualityLand and A5 which were scrapped by HBO in 2021."
Source: https://variety.com/2021/tv/news/hbo-mike-judge-qualityland-a5-1234905257/ Pancakesarentcakes (talk) 21:04, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: . I slightly altered the wording though. ‑‑Volteer1 (talk) 02:23, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 17 June 2021 

message: The political section of this article seems to say nothing. He does put politics into his product (so says the article) and it seems that the subject has made little to no WP:DUE statements on politics. Why is the section here? Jtbobwaysf (talk) 21:17, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Politics  

message: Judge was born in Ecuador. Pursuant to Ecuadorian nationality law, all people born on Ecuadorian soil, without exception, hold Ecuadorian nationality. I personally see no reason not to list Judge as Ecuadorian-American, but am open to others' input. Overlasting Peace (talk) 04:47, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nationality 
Talk:Vidhana Soudha

message: The page is more about Bangalore than Vidhana Soudha itself, unless I misunderstood what Vidhana Soudha is. -- Alex Schröder 08:53, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment by User:Alex Schröder 

message: We say it is 213 by 107 metres. That is 22,791 m^2 or . We then say its size is 24 ha (60 acres) which looks like it is an order of magnitude too big unless it includes the surrounding grounds. We also say its floor area is 46,963 m^2 (505,505 sq ft) which is also unreferenced. I'll add some tags. --Cavrdg (talk) 13:54, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I agree that 60 acres seems too large, even - this is me speaking anecdotally - including the surrounding grounds. However, I do remember seeing the 213x107 dimensions in a journal, I'll see if I can dig it up. Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI converse | fings wot i hav dun 05:05, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Areas 

message: There is no Information about B R Manickam who designed this building  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 113.29.58.10 (talk) 07:18, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment by 113.29.58.10 

message: It's in Bangalore 223.223.231.151.127 223.231.151.127 (talk) 16:12, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vidhana soudha
Template talk:Tlt

message: 
Please change doc/talk to talk. This template hasn't been edited for years, and current practise is to have template documentation on its own page, not on the talk page. PC78 (talk) 15:41, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --- RockMFR 22:15, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request
Talk:Miss Europe

message: * Does anyone know who represented Poland in 1928? Perakk 17:56, 3 May 2009
* Is there an official web site ?Hektor 08:57, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There's a lot to be done here. The map is way too big. What about the development after 2009? -- Horst-schlaemma (talk) 22:04, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please redo! 

message: The article starts with: "Miss Europe is...", yet there are winners only until 2006. Shouldn't it be "Miss Europe was..."? 82.141.67.208 (talk) 01:41, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  is/was 

message: A French-language source includes a mention of the rival contest: https://www.gala.fr/l_actu/news_de_stars/miss_france_genese_d_un_concours_de_beaute_140397 Fences&Windows 16:07, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Another: https://www.mesformaliteslegales.fr/la-marque-miss-france-sous-convoitises/ Fences&Windows 16:12, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rival contest 
Talk:Hama-rikyū Gardens

message: This article seems to be a copy of JNTO's article . (Terms of Use: ) --163.139.215.193 09:16, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright 

message: It does appear to be translated (and not especially well) from some sort of advertising source. Phrases like "The garden has an atmosphere of tranquility where visitors can forget the passage of time" should not appear in a properly serious and objective encyclopedia article. LordAmeth 12:13, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:Treaty of Sugali

message: This article and Sugauli Treaty both refer to the same exact treaty. So they should be merged. Sugauli (Devanagari - 'सुगौली') is the most common spelling in Nepal for the place where the treaty was signed. Also, Segowlee is the spelling used in the actual text of the treaty which does not give a correct pronounciation. Indiver 17:05, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Nitrogen laser

message: Can some one please help me with the not so easy to find facts about metastable Nitrogen and ion concentration! There are so many nice Nitrogen-Laser websites out there. Maybe someone can donate a photo? Our Laser doesn't work so well :-( --Arnero 09:20, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: In my opinion the sentence " The nitrogen laser is a 3-level laser. In contrast to a ruby laser or to other more typical 4-level lasers, the upper laser level of nitrogen is directly pumped, imposing no speed limits on the pump. Pumping is normally provided by direct electron impact; the electrons must .."is confusinal beacuse ruby laser is a 3 level laser, I have had some heartbeat reading it, i thought all i've studied was injust  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Franz as tux (talk • contribs) 13:36, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not clear 

message: The text is contradictory to the wikipedia entry of the ruby laser.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.176.12.234 (talk) 09:24, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, the text was wrong. I fixed it.--Srleffler (talk) 02:41, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  ruby laser is not a four level laser 

message: Isn't there a visible laser line for Nitrogen? — Charles Edwin Shipp (talk) 13:37, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Reason I ask is because in 1969 I received the MA in Physics creating and demonstrating a 567.96 nm (yellow-green) laser line from a low-pressure high-voltage 65cm laser. The media was air. — Charles Edwin Shipp (talk) 22:49, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Visible Nitrogen spectral line 

message: I noticed that the link to a commercial version was a dead Newport page. Tried retrieving the page using the Wayback machine but couldn't find it. So I linked a different commercial laser and updated the energy per pulse to suit.--Uhoj (talk) 02:37, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  commercial version
Talk:December 2005 protest in Hong Kong

message: Perhaps this should be renamed to 12/4 March? Also, is this name widely used? -- Anon.
:I feel that would be an unhelpful name, as it wouldn't convey a)What the marches were about b)Where they were c)What date they occurred on, to people outside the US, hence making them unlikely to be found by someone searching from memory. My 2p. 57.66.51.165 16:08, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The above query was made when this article was titled 124 March. — Instantnood 16:30, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename

message: According to Chief Executive of Hong Kong article, the "elected Chief Executive must then be approved by the Central People's Government", but this statement was removed from this article. Is the statement true or false? thks. --Vsion 06:27, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It's true, but it's irrelevant to the protest or electoral reform. A popularly elected Chief Executive by universal suffrage will still be appointed by the Central People's Government in Beijing. — Instantnood 08:05, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It's quite relevant; the entire point of the protest is to call for the economic freedoms and social liberties commonly misidentified as "democracy," and such a system is inherently undemocratic.  I find it quite strange that they'd go to all this trouble and not object to the main problem.  Rogue 9 08:55, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This was a protest to the government's proposed package of electoral changes. The economy here is free enough (usually ranked as the freest), and civil liberties are basically available. Many PMs are appointed by monarchs or  presidents.. is that undemocratic? — Instantnood 10:31, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I notice that according to Basic Law, the correct word is "appointed" not "approved". Therefore except in unusual circumstances, I believe it is just a formality, then Instantnood is correct that it is irrelevant. The protestors are pushing for universal suffrage, not federalism. There are news media who used the word "approved", which is technically inaccurate and misleading. --Vsion 10:42, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I cannot comment if it is simply a formality. Nobody has ever made it clear that whether the CPG can choose not to appoint a candidate-elect. — Instantnood 11:14, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: If a person is elected, then appointed, that does mean that the person elected must be approved - even if it is a mere formality. --Xinoph 17:23, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Y..es.. but it's not explicitly stated in the Basic Law, and there's never such a situation, therefore it's only an assumption. — Instantnood 17:41, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chief Executive 

message: Why was this moved from the original pro-democracy title? No one's disputed that's what these guys were rallying for. Maybe you're not a fan of representative democracy Ruy but that's your own opinion. Dr. Trey 08:02, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree to move it back. There are many protests in December 2005 alone. — Instantnood 08:26, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Move
Talk:Rocky Mountains subalpine zone

message: As it stands, the article is really about the subalpine zone of the Rocky Mountains, and does not describe subalpine zones of even nearby ranges (e.g., Sierra Nevada). See Tundra or Tree line for an examples of articles that I think are adequately globalized. Conversely, see Sierra Nevada subalpine zone for an article that concentrates on one range's subalpine zone. The article either needs to be moved to Rocky Mountain subalpine zone and/or rewritten from scratch. I can do the move, but I don't think I have the background to rewrite the article. hike395 09:42, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I am the author of the original, and I agree with your assessment concerning its focus. I'm not skilled at moving it (renaming?) but if you want to, fwiw you have my blessing to do so. --Photoleif 03:23, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Geographical imbalance
Talk:Hilario Fernández Long

message: During the 1980s, HFL and an associate (his consulting partner... name escapes me) also played an important part in computers and education, using Logo and turtle graphics (following Jean Piaget and Seymour Papert). I attended lots of Lego-centered sessions for engineers. It was great fun seeing the example of the bicycle wheel... elpincha 10:04, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Armorial of the United Kingdom

message: I have added the version of the arms for use in Scotland and renamed the Northern Ireland Version.
These arms were granted to the Government of Northern Ireland, and so fell into disuse when Direct Rule was applied in the 1970s.  I have used the term "obsolete" as this term is also used in wikipedia for the Order of St Patrick, newver abolished but never used.  In theory the present devolved assembly and government could use the arms, a Royal Licence perhaps to confirm the right of succession (OK it is a theory and ignores the present party political situation).
The Public record office holds a series of correspondence between the Home Office and the King of Arms re a new badge for Northern Ireland around 1970.  Deemed politically inexpedient to grant the Province a Royal Badge, Garter then insisted that the badge, like the arms, was for the Government of Northern Ireland.  A subtle but crucial difference in the eyes of the Heralds, but ignored by the politicians.  No new badge was forthcoming. garryq 10:11, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Northern Ireland 

message: User 80.229.238.161 made the following comment in the main article. I have reverted the article and moved the comment here.
:"Guernsey is wrong; it is differenced from the arms of Jersey (and England) by the addition of a sprig. See, for example <www.ngw.nl/int/cha/guernsey.htm>."
I leave someone else to update the image if appropriate. TrevorD 18:57, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guernsey