Talk:Evaporite

message: Removed the following pending a source:
:Salt rocks also form by replacement of carbonate rocks by salts. A new theory of salt deposition is related to deep origin where supercritical water loss molecular polarity and capacity of dissolution of salts and then salt from brines are deposited by hydrothermal processes in deep water, mainly in rift systems. Salt rocks is frequently associated with volcanism.
Provide a reference and it can be cleaned up and re-inserted. Vsmith 02:23, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Removed the following:
:A new theory, in development by a research group headed by Martin Hovland called "Hydrothermal salt theory", of salt formation was proposed recently. Salt originally is related to volcanic environments and hydrothermal processes involving supercritical water (loss polarity of water molecule) that can not dissolve salts and carrying out salt forming stocks. It's interesting to note that halogens such as chlorine, bromine, iodine pratically do not occur as rock forming minerals in earth surface. Then is plausible that salt origin comes from depths. Good examples are salt forming in rift zones (Red Sea, African Rift), transform zones (Dead Sea, Salton Sea), Salar Uyuni (Bolivia).
It is based on recently published material in Oil & Gas Journal, January 15, 2007 . Wikipedia doensn't need to embrace such new theories quite so fast - wait a bit for some verification and testing, questioning by professionals in the field. The earlier addition of this material was sourced to Martin Hovland's website and this appears to be someone promoting his work prematurely. In addition some of the material added is simply wrong and poorly worded. For example, the halogens fluorine and chlorine do occur in surface and near surface rock forming minerals. Vsmith (talk) 03:29, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not responsive. You are removing without knowledge judging as a censor like middle age times. A good chance to test present origin of salt rocks would be its mention in the Wikipedia - "The Free Encyclopedia?" In my opinion is important all people have access to new thoughts; if you remove citations based on laboratory and field researches you will kill this chance. About fluorine and chlorine, in fact, there are a lot of mineral that occur near surface rock minerals but there are much more halogens in sea water and salt pans than you know and it's more plausible that salt comes from hydrothermal deep systems related to volcanic activity. I strongly reccomend you remove vandalism in Wikipedia but not new ideas because you are walking against science evolution. Think better.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.60.181.114 (talk) 01:28, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "New theory" 

message: Hello,I am an undergraduate student at SUNY Potsdam, and recently did a project on Evaporites, I have some material that I thought useful. I placed it under depositional environments, and needed help integrating into what is currently written there. I believe that it will be very helpful to this page and would like to place it here without having too many problems. This was just to let you know what I was going to do, so we may work together to make this web page better for everyone. Thanks for your help. I know the citing is wrong and I am currently trying to fix it.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Garranlp193 (talk • contribs) 17:34, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Added  tag to ref section to fix the problem. Vsmith (talk) 18:27, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  '''New Information''' 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Evaporite. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20121028080550/http://www.eoearth.org/article/Sulfur?topic=49557 to http://www.eoearth.org/article/Sulfur?topic=49557
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:44, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: In section "Marine evaporites", there are two occurrences of the word "evaporates" (within the text "... excluding carbonate minerals that tend not to be evaporates. The most common minerals that are generally considered to be the most representative of marine evaporates ...") that apparently should instead be "evaporites".  Jwpat7 (talk) 05:15, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Done, thanks. Vsmith (talk) 13:37, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Instances of "evaporates" should be "evaporites"? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Evaporite. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060912123341/http://seis.natsci.csulb.edu/bperry/Sedimentary%20Rocks%20Tour/evaporites.htm to http://seis.natsci.csulb.edu/bperry/Sedimentary%20Rocks%20Tour/evaporites.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:13, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018)