Talk:Hip

message: The listed planes of motion are inverted. Flexion/extension is in a sagittal plane, while abduction/adduction is a lateral movement, out to one's side.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.77.151.10 (talk) 18:27, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adduction/Abduction vs. Flexion/Extension 

message: I am wondering about the statement regarding the coccyx:  "It serves little or no purpose."  If this is true, could we get a reference?  I'm pretty sure if we just removed our coccyx at birth, it would affect other parts of our development, and that the body is built with the coccyx in mind.  I mean, in the evolutionary perspective, if we once had tails, and the tails 'fell off', then why didn't the coccyx fall off, too?  I think the sentance in question is a little suspect.  Rhetth 15:19, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  coccyx contention 

message: Any good reason why Hip and Hip joint aren't separate articles?  Hip joint redirects to Hip (anatomy)#Articulation but the movements in the joint are described in Hip (anatomy)#Movements and the involved muscles detailed in Hip (anatomy)#Muscles producing movements at the hip joint.  This don't make sense to me.  Would anyone object splitting the article?  Maybe reorganising the present article is enough?  Any suggestions?
 / Raven in Orbit (t|c) 09:32, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hip and hip joint 

message: After a hip replacement could there be any problems with a good remedial massage and treatment on a Computerised Thermal Treatment Table.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.63.193.69 (talk) 02:38, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hip replacement and remedial massage 

message: I think this picture would fit nicely in the article, but I do not know the correct English names of the bones. Maybe some wikipedian can help?Jasy jatere (talk) 19:26, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  nice new img, but missing names 

message: The haunch is not the same thing as the hip.  It's more of the thigh/butt.  It should redirect there?  206.72.25.210 (talk) 00:52, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Good question.  I made a section, made the redirect go there, and put the expand tag on it.  --Una Smith (talk) 16:50, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I just moved the section to haunch, as that is not the "hip" of the horse, that's the buttock. Montanabw(talk) 05:13, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  haunches 

message: Hello. 
I am a member of WikiProject Anatomy, a Wikipedia wide project that maintains and improves articles that fall under the scope of anatomy. Since your article has fallen under our scope, I have placed the correct templates on this talk page for verification. Upon review of this article, I'd like to make a few points, as shown:
*Assess articles with class and importance factors
*Since I am a member of WP:MED, I've also updated the Med Wiki assessment
I'm glad this article could fall within our scope, and I hope to see it grow large! Many thanks! Renaissancee (talk) 03:46, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I am totally confused by the wording at the start of the article ("The hip region is located lateral and anterior to the gluteal region ..."). Wikitionary text about hip almost understandable ("The outward-projecting parts of the pelvis and top of the femur and the overlying tissue.") How about an image depicting what parts of the skin are part of the hip region? --EarthFurst (talk) 21:21, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Assessment for [[WP:ANATOMY|WikiProject Anatomy]]

message: I think the value 126° given in the Thieme Atlas is an oversimplification. My textbook (Srakarjeva Ortopedija, 2nd ed., 2006, which is in Slovene, unfortunately) gives the values from 125° till 132° as normal in adults. --Eleassar my talk 07:12, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: CCD angle: normal values