lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Mark Rendall

message: This article is in serious need of a rewrite. Facts need should only be stated once. Weasel words should be removed. Citations should be included. Here is a chance for some young fan to write an article like an adult. Ronstew 05:34, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:John Stanley, 18th Earl of Derby

message: ==Untitled==
I believe Lord Derby was involved in the ownership of TWW/Teledu Cymru, the ill-fated ITV franchise for Wales and the West of the 1960s. Does anyone have any more info on this? Jeremicus rex (talk) 03:08, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: TWW ownership

message: I believe Lord Derby was involved in the ownership of TWW/Teledu Cymru, the ill-fated ITV franchise for Wales and the West of the 1960s. Does anyone have any more info on this? Jeremicus rex (talk) 03:08, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mark Saltzman

message: I think there's an error in the personal data column. The Z is missing from the last name. I didn't know if it was intentional. Romero 19:42, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mark Saunders (record producer)

message: There is a ban on Wikipedia articles linked to a personal web-site.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.160.202.155 (talk) 10:30, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't think there was - I thought that if it was a biography of someone whose notability could be proven outside of their own sources (i.e. their own website) then a link to their personal website was allowable, as long as no facts or figures about that person come from it.  here it is in the external links section, not the references section, so that's ok. -- roleplayer 11:20, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ban 

message: Mark Saunders seems to have been born in the 1960's.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.160.202.155 (talk) 13:08, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of Birth 
Talk:Mark Skousen

message: In the section "Political and economic views" Skousen is described as a member of the Austrian school. He has definitely taken that view during his career, but I think this section could be edited. In his book Vienna and Chicago, he takes a more nuanced view of economics that simply "Austrian" and seems to advocate (or at least seems sympathetic to) a merging and mixing of the Austrian and Neoclassical schools of thought. Perhaps this section could be edited to show that? Any thoughts? Vienna and Chicago is the only book by him that I've read and I wouldn't consider myself an expert on Mark Skousen's economic views.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.6.16.56 (talk) 23:05, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Skousen's economic views-Austrian? 
Talk:Elizabeth Boleyn, Countess of Wiltshire

message: Another Boleyn Child
Just read a bio on Mary Boleyn by Alison Weir that said that Mary and Anne had a brother born about 1500 whose name was Thomas who lived until 1520. There is no listing on Wiki  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.77.127.106 (talk) 15:31, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is no portrait in existence identified as Elizabeth Boleyn. Boleyn (talk) 11:45, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening heading 

message: ::Ormond was spelled without the e up until the 17th century, so the name should be changed.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 16:48, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ormond not Ormonde 

message: Is there a source for the names and years of birth for all of the children listed? The birth years of her surviving children are not known, let alone those of any deceased siblings. 109.78.246.143 (talk) 01:01, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: They were added without a source. I am removing all save the three which are documented as having reached adulthood.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 13:16, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boleyn Children 

message: Why are we still referring to her as “Lady Elizabeth Howard” on several pages? Yes, her father became a Duke later in life, but after she became “Elizabeth Boleyn”. Her father had been restored as Earl of Surrey in 1489; and was created (or restored as) Duke of Norfolk in 1514 (2nd Duke of the Howard creation). She didn’t even become “Lady Elizabeth Boleyn” until her husband was knighted in 1509. In modern times a daughter of an Earl uses the courtesy title “Lady”, sure, but in Tudor times if your name was “Lady Elizabeth Howard”, that signified you were the wife of a knight with the surname, Howard. Her mother, born Elizabeth Tilney, would have been known as “Lady Elizabeth Howard” after Thomas Howard was knighted in 1478. Lady Meg (talk) 05:43, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: He was Earl of Surrey from 1483-85 as well. Lady Meg (talk) 07:13, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  “Lady Elizabeth Howard”? 

message: The Mowbray Dukes of Norfolk title became extinct in 1476. Howard didn’t become Duke until 1483. A lot of history on the Dukedom is missing so I just took out the mention of the last Duke. Made it seem like Howard was closely related and like there was no history of the title from 1476-1483. Mowbray’s daughter, Anne, becomes Countess of Norfolk. She married the Duke of York who is created Duke of Norfolk by his father, King Edward IV. All the estates of his father-in-law are given to the young Duke. Then, the kid disappears in the Tower and his uncle becomes King and creates Howard Duke of Norfolk. Don’t think we want all that history mentioned in the beginning of her article so I trimmed it down to just the fact that he was made Duke in 1483 by Richard III. Lady Meg (talk) 06:26, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mowbray Dukes of Norfolk
Talk:List of public housing estates in Hong Kong

message: I don't believe we should be creating a set of links from this page. For most of these housing estates, there is nothing notable. There may be a case of creating articles for housing estates in each district. I have reverted them for the time being. Ohconfucius 15:32, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Note to readers: the point above has been discussed at length at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Hong Kong. A consensus has emerged to merge most articles about individual public housing estates into larger articles covering whole areas. olivier (talk) 08:46, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: As the tables on this overview page, and those under the "overview" heading of each of the district pages (i.e. Public housing estates in Sha Tin) should hypothetically be identical, I plan to migrate them to templates to make maintenance easier. As it stands this page has become quite out of date. Citobun (talk) 14:54, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Move to templates
Talk:Mark Valera

message: Has it been confirmed that Belinda and Keith were a couple?  She specifically said in her interview on Facing Evil that they were not.  Then again, she could be lying...either way, if you don't have it backed up, I suggest you change it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.241.58.240 (talk) 19:12, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boyfriend?
Talk:Mark Warren (referee)

message: hi mark hope you get the email ,would be nice to catch up on any old west midlands news cheers bob harris .email addresss robertharris17@hotmail.com ,hope to catch ya soon  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.203.83.65 (talk) 20:50, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  hi stranger 
Talk:Mark Wirtz

message: The opening sentence of the article is supposed to give the nationality of the subject.  In Wirtz's case it seems problematic.  He was born in Strasbourg in 1943, at a time when Alsace, previously part of France, had been occupied and annexed by Germany.  Wirtz spent his childhood in Germany; Strasbourg was later returned to France.  Wirtz seems to have spent different parts of his life in the UK, Switzerland and the US.  Biographies and obituaries tend to avoid giving him a "nationality", and his own website biography here does describe him as "Alsatian-born".  That seems unsatisfactory to me, but is there a better alternative?   Ghmyrtle (talk) 07:12, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alsatian? 

message: "Partner: Jeff Janning"
Does this refer to a business partnership? Harfarhs (talk) 12:54, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Partner?
Talk:United States Code Congressional and Administrative News

message: I have read the GA guidelines carefully and decided this counts as a good article. I agree that this article is not likely to get much longer and I'm a believer that length isn't a sign of quality. I can make no suggestions to put this article into a higher class except, if it is possible, try to find various references rather than relying on the same ones over and again Douglike 23:21, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Review

message: I added the fact that the United States Code Congressional and Administrative News is a West Group publication.  This fact is, in my opinion, important enough that its absence would make the article deficient. 38.100.34.2 23:48, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who publishes it? 

message: This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Regards,Ruslik 12:08, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA review &mdash; kept

message: If USCCAN is published by West Group, then by definition, it is not a government publication.  I am therefore removing the category "Publications of the United States Government". --Eastlaw (talk) 00:55, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a government publication 

message: I removed the Sections banner from the article because I don't believe the article is long enough to warrant sections. The article is only 241 words(excluding image caption) and the help page section on Section size policies(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Section#Section_size_policies) indicates that individual sections can be anywhere between 80 and 500 words. Since the article is only two paragraphs and does not need a section break to enhance clarity, readability, or ease of finding information in the article, I seen no reason whatsoever to divide the article into sections. It is a short article that is not likely to ever get any longer(as recognized in the GA review), so division into sections is unwarranted. -Dekkanar (talk) 19:59, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sections in article 

message: I can't for the life of me figure what lead an editor to put a GAR request template on this page, so I have removed it. Jezhotwells (talk) 04:20, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: GAR request

message: Part of the GA criteria is layout, which means that the article needs to have sections and a lead. Will leave a note here to see if anyone watching the page and familiar with the article can resolve this. AIRcorn (talk) 03:38, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA status
Talk:Markéta Irglová

message: This article may be enhanced by one of my images located at Oxegen 2008. However she does have her back to me but is sitting at the piano. --➨♀♂Candlewicke  ST   11:38, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oxegen Image 
Talk:George Berkeley, 8th Baron Berkeley

message: I've taken the liberty of moving the page to the surname used in standard references such as The Complete Peerage, the online Oxford Dictionary of National Biography etc. The note made by an earlier editor will alert Wikipedia readers to the fact that this is the same individual to whom The Duchess of Malfi is dedicated as 'George Harding'. NinaGreen (talk) 01:34, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Harding surname
Talk:George Manners, 11th Baron Ros

message: George Manners, 12th B. Ros and Lady Anne St. Leger are my great-grandparents and I was wondering if you would like to add photos of their tombs to the site? I thought about attempting it myself but decided against it when I saw the directions on how to upload photos to the site. All I ask in return is a link to my site. I also have hundreds of photos of some of my other great-grandparents tombs,if you would be interested in those also.
                                   89.100.146.215 (talk) 15:44, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  George Manners. 12th B. Ros and Lady Anne St. Leger photos
Talk:Lord Berners

message: I've seen his epitaph cited as "Here lies Lord Berners / One of the learners / His great love of learning / May earn him a burning / But praise to the lord / He seldom was bored" (Faringdon Online community website). Does anyone know which version is correct? talkGiler 13:59, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Epitaph... 

message: ... "found himself somewhat out of favour".
To the author of the article, and to myself as well, the meaning of that is crystal clear.
I assume the author intended there to be two chortles in that sentence, and I chortled twice.
But in a general interest encyclopedia, with some theoretical teenage readership, should we be spelling that out more explicitly?
I'm not going to change it since it works perfectly for me right now.
Varlaam (talk) 23:36, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Rome from 1939 to 1945" 

message: I have reverted an undiscussed move of this page, both per WP:COMMONNAME and per previous discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Composers/Archive_37#Michael_Berkeley.  The previous discussion was admittedly brief but there seems no reason to go against our usual naming convention.  This composer is almost always known, both formally and informally, as "Lord Berners".  --Deskford (talk) 20:59, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Almost every peer is known as "Lord Wotsit", but that's not generally how we title articles on them. Please explain why this individual should be an exception to our naming conventions clearly enumerated at WP:NCPEER. There are exceptions, but this individual certainly isn't in the league of Lord Tennyson or Lord Byron, since unlike them most people will never have heard of him. There was certainly no consensus for this title. You suggested it and someone else agreed with you - that's not a consensus! -- Necrothesp (talk) 09:53, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: There should be a VERY high bar for using "Lord X" as an article title for any individual when there have been multiple Lords X.12.144.5.2 (talk) 05:16, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title
Talk:Markus Vater

message: Removed resume-like list of group shows to here.--Ethicoaestheticist (talk) 00:50, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Group exhibitions
Talk:Gregory Cromwell, 1st Baron Cromwell

message: Date of death? Three sources give very different answers. Charles Matthews (talk) 12:11, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Seems pretty factual, but might as well be titled  In Henricum. I mean, nobody likes Henry VIII, but it's written like they're trying to convict him. Lots of Original research here.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.181.254.128 (talk) 09:07, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hm..... 

message: Elizabeth Seymour was known as Lady Ughtred when she was married to Sir Anthony Ughtred circa 1531 and continued to be addressed as Lady Ughtred, as his widow, from December 1534 until her remarriage to Gregory Cromwell in 1537 when she was addressed as Elizabeth Cromwell.--Madame Bonheur (talk) 23:35, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elizabeth Seymour - Form of address before her marriage to Gregory Cromwell 

message: The accounts of Cromwell's early life by Chapuys, Pole and Bandello "complement rather than contradict each other, although with one interesting exception. Cromwell's father was a 'smith' (Chapuys) but a 'cloth shearer' (Pole, Bandello). Foxe clarifies the matter with the information that Cromwell 'was born in Putney or thereabouts, being a smith's son, whose mother married a shearman'. So the smith was Cromwell's natural father and the shearman (or shearer) was the step-father...
So it is not certain  whether Cromwell was the name of the father or the step-father." 
Source: John Schofield, 'The Rise and Fall of Thomas Cromwell: Henry the VIII's Most Faithful servant', 2011, p. 13
The Acts and Monuments of John Foxe, ed. S.R. Cattley, 1838, vol. v, p. 362
http://archive.org/stream/actsmonumentsofj05foxe#page/362/mode/1up/search/cromwell
--Madame Bonheur (talk) 23:33, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thomas Cromwell's Father/Step-father 

message: This article is excessively long. It has far too much material about Gregory's father Thomas, who is of course the subject of a separate major article. 
The writer of this article also makes the repeated grammatical mistake of omitting the necessary second comma in appositive phrases such as "his father, Thomas was a powerful man".
JamesD'Alexander (talk) 12:02, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  excessively long / appositive commaS
Talk:5040 (number)

message: This page has links to the number 5041 in French, Japanese and Russian. Why the number 5041? This article is about 5040. I have corrected the number 5041  to 5040 (e.g. 3960 + 1080 = 5040 NOT 5041) but since I don't want to "mess" further the page, I am asking from an more experienced user to take action. Thank you in advance. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by ManosAgN (talk • contribs) 00:39, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think I got all the 5041's back to 5040's. Feel free to revert vandalism when you see it in the future. Leebo T/C 00:50, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Mis-links

message: *As previously stated, 5040 is the product of both 1 × 2 × 3 × 4 × 5 × 6 × 7 and 7 × 8 × 9 × 10.  Additionally, 7920 is the product of 8 × 9 × 10 × 11.
*The ratio 7920/5040, which is (11!/7!)/7!, or equivalently 11!/(7!)², also equals 11/7. The numbers 11 and 7 are the only other pair of natural numbers (along with 3 and 2) for which this occurs: (n!/m!)/m! = n/m; or equivalently: n!/(m!)² = n/m.
*The ratio 7920/5040 simplifies to 11/7, which is π/2 (when using 22/7 for π). Similarly, 5040/7920 is 7/11, which is 2/π (when using 22/7 for π).
*Given a circle with radius 5040 units, a quarter of that circle's circumference is 7920 units (when using 22/7 for π).  
*On the 27th of August, 2002, a crop formation was discovered at Crooked Soley in Wiltshire, England that had an outer ring split into 1,296 curved, diamond-like sections.  The crops in 504 of those sections were still standing while the crops in the other 792 were leaning virtually horizontally.
Mike Rosoft (talk) 11:55, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: 5040 and 7920 (removed trivia)
Talk:Marlene Favela

message: Marlene is one of the most beautiful women in the World. She can make a bad movie worth watching. Her eyes are incredible, her smile enchanting and her body is that of the love Godess herself.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.200.183.47 (talk) 20:37, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There are many accounts of a Marlene Favela on MySpace. We don't know for sure if she has one.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alex414 (talk • contribs) 02:31, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  MySpace account 

message: I feel very ashamed of Marlene favela Wikipedia. she deserves more ..look at how incomplete and boring the wikipedia is..I was only trying to help.
Ejezie Swanky (talk) 10:13, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: You should know very well that if you're adding information should add reliable sources, which did not and instead go to the talk page of the article you did was create edit war with different ips. That is wanting help Wikipedia?. The awards do not go that way, then the whole article will be based on a list?. When did you use the ips you left messages for me in the To Event, that will look right?. Thus it is like you want help Wikipedia?.--Philip J Fry • Talk 12:41, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request on 12 September 2015 

message: Phily J Fry; NielM; The links from source pages were rejected by Wikipedia but please If you have any other social media whether Facebook; Twitter or Instagram I'll be more than happy you helped Me ...I could give you the link in those social media.. please and thank you..
 I'll be more than happy if anyone helps me .
. my username in Twitter is @Ezolanski ..please guys anyone please... thanks  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ejezie Swanky (talk • contribs) 17:45, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please help improve Marlene Favela 

message: the information i just edited in the marlene favela award section and it is a great step in expanding the page. and wikipedia has given the go ahead to expand Wikipedia  pages. the information is reliable and i know someone is gonna still remove the information but i plea not to.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Banky da silver (talk • contribs) 13:50, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  please dont remove what i editedv but be kind to add
Talk:Henry Clifford, 10th Baron Clifford

message: 'Spirited away...' and 'good news' - not quite WP style? Jackiespeel (talk) 10:57, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Does it read a little better now? ——SN54129 10:52, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Queried it some while ago and cannot remember the query. Jackiespeel (talk) 11:22, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Style
Talk:Marlys Edwardh

message: this entry has no references, was created by a sockpuppet of a blocked user and ,imho, is of questionable notability.Toyokuni3 (talk) 15:52, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Siniša Ubiparipović

message: He is a Serb so he should also be under Serbian American category.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.189.197.200 (talk) 13:01, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Marquetta Goodwine

message: Need birthplace and date of birth. Badagnani (talk) 01:19, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Biographical details
Talk:Marshall Goldsmith

message: This article reads like Marshall or his mum wrote it. Look at a dead person's entry and use that as a model. Best book on leadership? ... need a cite to explain why Machiavelli has gone down a notch. Victuallers (talk) 12:16, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with Victuallers general assessment. I'm tackling some other pages now... will do my best to see if I can clean this up a bit. Comments? TheNewGuy (talk) 03:33, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Article review
Talk:Marshall Lancaster

message: I've removed a few external link, which are all apparently to fan websites and the like and contain links to unlicensed video copies of BBC content and so on.  According to the External links guideline, such links are usually unsuitable because they do not comply with Wikipedia's policies on copyright. See Wikipedia:Copyrights. --Anticipation of a New Lover's Arrival, The 16:42, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fan sites
Talk:Marshall Terrill

message: just curious. the steve mcqueen article says when steve died he was found pointing to a certain passage in the bible which smacks of obvious christian propaganda.  so is Terrill a religious whack job?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.187.190.208 (talk) 17:19, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: If your question is ‘is Terrill a Christian?’ then the answer is yes. It is well known that McQueen did ‘come to faith’ toward the end of his life. In the bonus features included with the Bullitt dvd, this aspect is talked about by his son and, if I remember correctly, his then wife Barabra. Most of the media did not report this aspect of McQueen’s life due to the kind of reaction evidenced in your question. It would not have fit with his public persona and would have been deemed a fabrication. The claim of McQueen ‘pointing to a certain passage’ is at best a rumor, at worst a lie. I’ve seen no verifiable evidence that it is true. Hope that helps you out if you’re still out there. THX1136 (talk) 03:35, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: is he a religious whack job?
Talk:Marshall Ulrich

message: I cleaned up many of the citations, and several sites no longer exist (Ulrich's website isn't 'safe' according to Chrome).  Thtriumph (talk) 21:09, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleaned up citations