lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Catalina Island Conservancy

message: Hi, the third sentence in the Conservation section mentions "76 invasive plants".  Presumably that means "plant species". I've adjusted the sentence accordingly. Nice article; it needs more polishing. Regards, ... PeterEasthope (talk) 14:40, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Invasive plants 

message: Yellowstone has proven the concept of a keystone species and it's effects upon an environment. The wolf controls deer populations, allowing for proper vegetation to grow. The wolf sellects the weak for prey, thereby maintaing integrity of the deer heard. The wolf's population is controlled by food source availability and both will find a natural ballance. This I documented in nature by PBS 12.165.86.82 (talk) 22:06, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mule deer population control
Talk:Cathedral of Saint Mary of the Assumption (San Francisco)

message: For what it's worth, here is another image which can eventually be used in the article. Fred Hsu 03:27, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Images

message: I don't know if it's worth mentioning, but locals refer to this cathedral as "Our Lady of Maytag", a reference to the similarities between the cathedral's shape and the agitator in a top-loading washing machine. Eganio 21:56, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This used to be on the page and certainly deserves a mention.  I know SF residents who don't even know the real name of the church! Philosophygeek (talk) 22:57, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Any reliable sources to back that up? Drmies (talk) 20:19, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nickname 

message: Quote the article:
Abuses and misinterpretation of the historic church council allowed the Archdiocese of San Francisco to plan boldly in the building of its new cathedral.
Is the article implying that the Archdiocese misinterpreted Vatican II and that's what let them plan for a modernist cathedral? Because that seems ... kinda insane. It's certainly NPOV. I'm going to remove it. --Jfruh (talk) 23:28, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Abuses and misinterpretatinons"
Talk:Cathedral of Saint Vibiana

message: Is the former cathedral on a historical landmark list? If so, which? Perhaps that can be incorporated into the infobox and cited. Additionally the coordinates should be determined and placed there too. --Morenooso (talk) 21:01, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Whoops, my bad! Perhaps the article could use an infobox. --Morenooso (talk) 21:04, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical landmark and coordinates improvements? 

message: I was baptized, received 1st communion & was confirmed at St. Vibiana's, and attended 4th and 7th grades at the St. Vibiana's Cathedral School. Are pictures of the school available? The school is part of the catherdral's history. How about adding information about the school to this page?
M. Kay Hovious Shalom92 (talk) 13:39, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cathedral School 
Talk:Television City

message: http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-cbs-television-city-20170928-story.html
Note according to this article there's speculation that CBS Television City Could be sold to various developers but that's pending at this time though.
http://abc7.com/business/cbs-television-city-draws-speculation-about-potential-sale/2470023/
Other news outlets are making speculation of Television City being sold.
:It's been sold and it's now called "Television City Studios". 108.246.199.105 (talk) 02:35, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Talks of CBS Television City being sold
Talk:People's Liberation Army Rocket Force

message: The caption to one of the pictures states that "Newer systems, such as the DF-31, DF-31A, and JL-2, will give China a more survivable nuclear force." Isn't that a bit ambiguous - presumably the force will be less survivable for the targets. Sir rupert orangepeel (talk) 05:11, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

message: Same abbreviation as Strategic Air Command...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.150.243.117 (talk) 02:54, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  SAC 

message: http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2011/12/chinanukes.php
Has it reached a point of needing a note, or will this mention in the talk page be sufficient to weed this out? Hcobb (talk) 15:41, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This article written by Hans Kristensen who is pretending to be from FAS (Federation of American Scientists) but he is not a scientists at all (he has no Ph.D. in physics or whatever, he has not even master degree!). He has just a colledge degree from Denmark 1981) and he is not an American (he is Danish and use to be a pacifist and Greenpeace activist-clerk then suddenly became an advisor in Danish Defence ministry!). His analysis about China's plutonium and uranium stockpiles is just a guess and his ungrounded ideas and numbers about the deficite of tritium in China is just a hoax (China has 9 CANDU  nuclear reactor which can produce up to 1 kg of tritium per year, besides one do not need tritium to detonate nuke!). I don't know why Kristensen spreading all this desinformation from late 90ies but this comedy need to be uncovered. Why no one from real American nuclear physiscs specialists (real scientists) are not writing about China nuke stockpile? Why this field of knowledge dominated by uneducated amateur such Hans Kristensen? 185.79.103.7 (talk) 19:59, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, Hans Kristensen biography is strange, one could take a look here: http://www.nukestrat.com/HansCV.pdf (dated 2007). The real question is: Who appointed him as an "expert" in this field??? 213.24.127.151 (talk) 19:00, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  China Does Not Have 3,000 Nuclear Weapons 

message: The article says ICBMS and IRBMs etc. Does the PLARF control the SLBM force?Phd8511 (talk) 03:56, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: That's currently unclear, some sources say it does, but some do not. It just got reorganized so I guess we should wait and see if a press release says anything. If I'd put my money on anything it'd be the PLAN keeping control of SLBMs. 24.192.250.124 (talk) 02:17, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does it control SLBMs? 

message: A significant quantity of information exists under the 中国人民解放军火箭军 ("Chinese People's Liberation Army Rocket Force") navigation template at the bottom of the corresponding Chinese article. Specifically for history and information on each of the PLARF bases. RightQuark (talk) 04:05, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion from Chinese articles
Talk:Ceanothus

message: It's incorrect to say that this genus is confined to North America. One example is Ceanothus 'Blue Sapphire' which is a New Zealand native and has been introduced to the Northern hemisphere from New Zealand. 218.101.120.87 14:18, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: So how is it that a named cultivar is "native" anywhere? What species is it from? Stan 17:36, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Sino-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact

message: ==Untitled==
The paragraph that I removed about how the treaty impacted relations between the People's Republic of China and the USSR was very misleading. The government of China that the Soviet Union backed against the Japanese, which was called the Republic of China and was led by Chiang Kai-Shek, was not the same as that of the People's Republic of China, which overthrew Chiang and was led by Mao. And China never was a Soviet satellite it was always very independent even after Mao's communists overthrew Chiang they still were very independent of the Soviet Union and had a somewhat bad relationship with that country. --76.214.115.213 (talk) 03:27, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Paragraph about how treaty impacted relations between the USSR and the People's Republic of China

message: The paragraph that I removed about how the treaty impacted relations between the People's Republic of China and the USSR was very misleading. The government of China that the Soviet Union backed against the Japanese, which was called the Republic of China and was led by Chiang Kai-Shek, was not the same as that of the People's Republic of China, which overthrew Chiang and was led by Mao. And China never was a Soviet satellite it was always very independent even after Mao's communists overthrew Chiang they still were very independent of the Soviet Union and had a somewhat bad relationship with that country. --76.214.115.213 (talk) 03:27, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:People's Liberation Army Special Operations Forces

message: I'd love to know where the contributor got those PLA SPECOPS patches.  Those are sweet.  I collect such crap from around the world, would love to get one. SkepticDragon (talk) 11:18, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

message: We generally know who the commanders are of major PLA military units; do we have such information for the special forces? DOR (HK) (talk) 20:25, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes for some notable ones such as the two brigades belonging to PLANMC or PLAAF, but this is not the case for the majority of PLA Ground Force SF units. Also, I do not recommend adding more information before a rewrite is done since this article is using outdated sources. Fallen Legends (talk) 14:35, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Leadership?

message: I remember this page having a lot more content. Now it barely qualifies as a stub. Could someone fill me in what the hell happened here? Colin Zhong (talk) 21:11, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  What happened to this page?
Talk:Centennial High School (Corona, California)

message: Who the heck is "Brandon Kessel?"  I believe there is a celebrity called "Brandon Kessel," but if you search on Google ["Brandon Kessel" "Centennial High"] you get no results.  If you simply search ["DJ 4orty"] there's no results.  --Bopomofo 22:42, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable Alumni 
Talk:Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences

message: Both articles have the same subject and should be merged into this article Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences because this is the whole name of the Center fromn the start. The other article has to be deleted because an articles shouldn't be named only half a name. 
Now I already integrated the text of the Center for Advanced Study article into this article. If anybody has a problem with that pleace let me know. - Mdd 20:38, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Center for Advanced Study]] article 

message: Due to possible violation of copyright, see WP:Copyvio, I have removed one or more section of this article for now. 
I apologize for all inconvenience I have caused here, see also here. If you would like to assist in improving this article, please let me know. I can use all the help I can get. Thank you.
-- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 20:02, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article section(s) removed 
Talk:Center for Biomimetic Microelectronic Systems

message: "Furthermore, to develop these novel biomimetic microelectronic systems, our BMES ERC’s work is..." It appears someone associated with the center wrote this. If this topic actually meets Wikipedia's notability requirements, it needs to be rewritten neutrally and properly cited. Otherwise, it should be deleted. Lostraven (talk) 14:40, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite or delete
Talk:Center for Land Use Interpretation

message: anything about the people behind this project? Or aren't there any? What is the motivation, who spends the money? Greetings -- 217.227.68.242 23:23, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You want CLI. csloat (talk) 23:50, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The address given (9331 Venice Blvd.) seems to be near the address for the Museum of Jurassic Technology.  The MJT is a project of David Wilson, while CLUI is a project of Matthew Coolidge.  Are the two related in some way?  Is the address given a correct one? Underalms (talk) 16:33, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Address 

message: Only 2 of the 7 sources are correctly linked (Sources 1 and 3). These links need to be updated, or the information should be removed or found elsewhere. Amberlord5 (talk) 05:52, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: Are there any other sources that would be less positively biased towards the CLUI? Most of the article is comprised of information from their official website, which could perhaps be subjective? Amberlord5 (talk) 05:55, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias 

message: To address the improvement tag, I've started work on the lead section, removing the street location, and adding more info about the actual functions of the organization. As time permits, will attempt to make other improvements to the article and its citations. Netherzone (talk) 00:08, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead section improvement
Talk:Center for Science, Technology, and Society

message: and  - I saw your recent edits to this article. They are out of scope of what Wikipedia covers, so I reverted them.
Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and encyclopedias summarize information which is already published. If you want your contributions to Wikipedia to stand, use citations after the statements you make. Also, in compliance with the reliable sources policy, never cite anything published by the subject of an article. Cite papers published by a third party, like a magazine. Post here if you have questions or comments. Go to the WP:TEAHOUSE to get other opinions or help learning how to use Wikipedia. I appreciate the effort and people will train you if you want to contribute by the rules.  Blue Rasberry (talk) 21:06, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikipedia is an encyclopedia
Talk:Center for the Built Environment

message: The assignment was complete and on time, no major error. So good Job!!!
I think the text is cohesive and give a general knowledge of the members within the CBE. 
I will suggest to add a general paragraph that summarize the titles of the people within CBE. 
As key members I will not add post doc. researcher, but I will mainly focus on the professors within CBE. 
I believe it would be important to add a brief description of Hui Zhang, Stefano Schiavon and Paul Raftery and have Thomas Parkinson and the other assistant professor and postdoc, just as a citation. 
"Within the Faculty and Staff (x), there are members with different background and experience, the team nowadays is composed of three professors, three postdoctoral researchers, two professional researcher, one research specialist, two assistants, a program director, a research coordinator, and a communications and research collaborations figure, which connects the CBE with the Industry partners."
For the sitography I think is complete, if there are important papers that the members wrote it would be nice to add them, but it would be something extra. Lorettaegidi (talk) 17:47, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Key members
Talk:Southeast High School (Ohio)

message: Okay, this is the talk page, so if you want to discuss what's here with me, you can either grabe me through email, at school, or...POST HERE!
Hmmm.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Corbyze (talk • contribs) 00:26, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your edits. The link provided for the student:teacher ratio is for the school district and not the school itself. I had to revert the student:teacher ratio to the last known link for the high school, but also updated the link to the ACT scores to the specific high school page. --JonRidinger (talk) 14:08, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

text: Also, the "minor edit" box is for making changes like correcting punctuation or spelling, or fixing an error in formatting. In other words, it doesn't change the info in the article. Even a small update like changing the name of the principal wouldn't be a minor edit since it is changing the information. See Help:Minor edit for more info --JonRidinger (talk) 14:16, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda

message: The entire History section and many of the Faculty and Department sections of this article were copied verbatim from the university's website (History section found here:  and an index of the Faculties and Departments found here: ). Thus, they were copyright violations and I have removed them as per WP:Copyright. Danelo 01:53, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of copyrighted content

message: I have serious doubts about the objectivity of this article. My wife is from India and she's never heard of this school. Also, it appears that the content is coming mainly from authors with a vested interest in the school's reputation.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by David.mcreynolds (talk • contribs) 02:43, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "is one of the premier universities of India" 

message: The page is written more like a brochure than an actual insight into the univerisity, its culture and how it has been vital for Gujarat.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.240.41.69 (talk) 05:33, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Structure 

message: The version 12:00, 19 August 2020‎ 106.76.90.229 of this article is translated into Chinese Wikipedia.--Wing (talk) 05:51, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  translation into Chinese Wikipedia
Talk:Central California Women's Facility

message: If anyone is interested, I have proposed a new Wikiproject concerning prisons here.--Cdogsimmons (talk) 00:16, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikiproject Prisons 

message: Larissa Schuster (sentenced to life in prison without parole for submerging her husband's body in hydrochloric acid.)
The single fact of submerging a human body in acid can't lead to the penalty of life without parole. The current wording suggests, that Schuster just put her husband's body in acid. If he was alive, it would be murder, if he was not, it would not be murder and I doubt you can get life without parole for the latter. -178.1.204.157 (talk) 18:36, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rephrasing needed
Talk:Central Coast (California)

message: Is there a reliable source that defines this region? —Stepheng3 (talk) 17:48, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: There is not and in general the vast majority of locals do not consider anything north of Monterey/Salinas the " Central Coast ". As a matter of fact the narrative presented on this particular page is absolutely incorrect. I have never encountered anyone who includes anything in Ventura country as part of the central coast. Most everyone agrees if there is a central coast, culturally and geographically speaking, it is from just north of Santa Barbara to Monterey. This page by far is the most ridiculous narrative I have seen yet. 2601:647:CC00:10A0:459C:5887:81EE:8D17 (talk) 17:26, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

text: I appreciate your flexibility with regard to the possibility of overlaps between regions.  This is an article that positively begs for better sources.  The only official definition I know for "Central Coast" is Code of Federal Regulations § 9.75 which includes portions of Monterey, Santa Cruz, Santa Clara, Alameda, San Benito, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, San Francisco, San Mateo, and Contra Costa counties — even more overlap than indicated in the lede. —Stepheng3 (talk) 18:36, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd like to get a little context on this CFR definition Stepheng3 shows.  It's almost impossible to find a rule section without knowing the Part; e.g. 47CFR90.123.  The 9.75 without the prefix showing with Part of the Federal Regulations isn't enough information to find the rule.  Could you please tell me which Part (i.e. the equivalent of the "47" in my example) it is in?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.176.162.246 (talk) 17:15, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  definition
Talk:Sri Sathya Sai Institute of Higher Learning

message: * Needs more information
* If possible some pictures too
* Please wikify appropriately
­ ॐ Kris (☎ talk | contribs) 13:50, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comments

message: Much of this text is verbatim from the University website rather than being an impartial summary.
Christopher.Seaman 07:47, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: POV Issue

message: "Admissions Prospectus 2017 Doctoral Research Programmes", a pdf featured on the Sri Sathya Sai University website defines very limited eligible "Areas of Research" for women. Ironically, a concentration in "Financial inclusion and Women empowerment" is offered in Economics, although this department is not open to women.
JeremyLeipzig (talk) 17:39, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Allegations of sexism' 
Talk:Mahatma Gandhi Memorial Medical College, Jamshedpur

message: with Jharkhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Jharkhand or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:37, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Jharkhand workgroup Addition 
Talk:MGR Medical University

message: I made this a redirect to The Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R. Medical University.  This is already a complete article on this, this stub provides nothing extra and is chiefly a duplicate. --InsufficientData (talk) 13:20, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Also removed this as a WP India project, so this redirect page won't show up in all of the categories and clutter them up.  It's certainly not a stub any more. --InsufficientData (talk) 13:22, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Made this article a redirect
Talk:Hurricane Klaus (1984)

message: Hmm.
#Stability: Pass
#Well-written: Hold
#Broadness: Pass
#Factually Accurate: Pass
#Images: You sure there isn't one more of the storm?
#Neutral: Pass
Problems:
#"The Federal Emergency Management Agency provided an average relief fund of $2,128 (1984 USD, $4147 2006 USD) per affected person, the smallest return rate for a declared disaster in the Virgin Islands."-you missed a comma.
# You sure there ain't a writer for the Klaus TCR?
# Did you try the MWR for 1984?
For now, On Hold.Mitchazenia(8300+edits) 16:53, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I got the comma. The writer for the Klaus TCR is unknown. The MWR provides nothing more than the tropical cyclone report, and thus there is no need to use it. Images are not a requirement for GA's, so is there anything else needed to promote this to GA? Hurricanehink (talk) 17:16, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Pass then. good job Hink.Mitchazenia(8300+edits) 17:18, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Assessment

message: As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Meteorology and atmospheric sciences" articles. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I have made several minor corrections throughout the article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2006. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. It would also be beneficial to go through the article and update all of the access dates of the inline citations and fix any dead links. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 22:20, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Sweeps Review: Pass

message: Klaus' name was retired from the hurricane list for its Caribbean impact, which should count for something.  Thegreatdr (talk) 19:00, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Please keep importance high, unless you wish to engage in a discussion about it