Talk:Social Democrats (Denmark)

message: :Image:Socialdemokratiet1945.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 05:57, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Socialdemokratiet1945.jpg

message: :Image:Socialdemokratiet2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 05:58, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Socialdemokratiet2.jpg

message: Now that the Social Democrats are the leading party in Denmark's ruling coalition, this article needs to be updated. - Ipigott (talk) 05:56, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need for update 

message: This article's infobox, similarly to those in the articles on other social-democratic parties, especially those from Scandinavian countries, are full of redundant ideologies like "Nordic social democracy" and "Third way". I do think that "social democracy" is enough as description. --Checco (talk) 19:34, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redundant ideologies 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Social Democrats (Denmark). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130524220521/http://www.lo.dk/omLO/faktaogtal/~/media/LO/Rundt_om_LO/Om_LO/FagligPolitiskBeretninger/FagligPolitiskeBeretning_2011.ashx to http://www.lo.dk/omLO/faktaogtal/~/media/LO/Rundt_om_LO/Om_LO/FagligPolitiskBeretninger/FagligPolitiskeBeretning_2011.ashx
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131215104514/http://www.socialdemokraterne.dk/A-socialdemokraterne-Ledelse-og-ordf%C3%B8rere-default.aspx?func=article.view&menuAction=selectOpen&menuID=700880&topmenuID=688048&id=700979 to http://www.socialdemokraterne.dk/A-socialdemokraterne-Ledelse-og-ordf%C3%B8rere-default.aspx?func=article.view&menuAction=selectOpen&menuID=700880&topmenuID=688048&id=700979
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111003184742/http://cphpost.dk/news/politics/90-politics/52255-here-are-denmarks-new-ministers.html to http://www.cphpost.dk/news/politics/90-politics/52255-here-are-denmarks-new-ministers.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:27, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: If someone has reliable sources on the party’s former use of the fist and rose emblem, do contribute to Fist and rose#Denmark. Keriluamox (talk) 10:54, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fist and rose 

message: I have corrected pronunciation for the Danish word Socialdemokratiet [soˈɕɛˀlte̝moˌkʰʁɑˀtɪət], not Socialdemokraterne [soˈɕɛˀlte̝moˌkʰʁɑˀtɐnə]. By the way, Socialdemokratiet means Social Democracy, not Social Democrats. MoRisop (talk) 11:06, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correction 

message: In the section called '20th century' there is claim made that alle prime ministers from the 1940's to 1972 were social democrats. This is simply untrue. For example, from 1968 to 1971 the prime minister was Hilmer Baunsgaard who was a socialliberal. There were also prime ministers in the post-war years that were from Venstre. If you click the link to Arbejdermuseet, the article also does not make this claim.
Another thing is that the year 1972 does not have any significance on whether or there was a social democratic prime minister. 1972 was the year of Denmark joining the EU and Jens-Otto Krag leaving office but the office was filled by another Social Democrat. I recommned deleting this comment. 5.179.80.206 (talk) 08:23, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Either error in source or simply false statement in section '20th Century' 

message: Hi :)
While editing and creating pages regarding Danish politics, for a long time, I've wanted to change the color of this party. Before a very light red  was being used, and this was solely based on just one of their logos. If we look at the page site, we see one of their other logos in the left corner, which looks similar to this . So as I see it, the party associates themselves equally with both shades of red. However three important sources - DR ;TV2 ; Official parliament site, all use the darker red for the party. 
So for this reason I've changed the color of the party to a darker red, as the media uses that shade of red + they do themselves partially. 
I will fix the parliament diagrams soon. Thomediter (talk) 17:10, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changed the color of a slightly darked red 

message: The infobox summary of the party's ideology should be reserved for actual ideologies, not used for supplementary information about various current political position taken up by the party, cf. MOS:INFOBOXPURPOSE and the following discussion threads who have formerly treated the same question: 
* Template_talk:Infobox_political_party/Archive_1#Proposal_to_add_Policies_and_Factions
* Talk:Swedish_Social_Democratic_Party/Archive_1#Redundant_ideologies
* Talk:Danish People's Party#Various Ideologies
Consequently, I have reverted this edit by  - anti-immigration is a party policy, not a fundamental ideology. Økonom (talk) 10:50, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ideology in infobox