lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Decisive victory

message: just battles but not wars?  Could this be generalized from battles to armed conflict in general?Zebulin 22:13, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

message: I have been working on improving an article called Turning point of the American Civil War (not a very good article by Wikipedia standards, which I can admit because I was the original author in 2004 or so) and I came across this article because sometimes the term turning point is used as a synonym for decisive victory. But I have to ask: what is the point of this article? It gives three different definitions of the same term and then provides a brief list of battles that meet one or more of those definitions, without identifying which ones are which. For example, the Battle of Gettysburg is not considered decisive in terms of the entire war, but it was decisive in terms of the Gettysburg Campaign and was indisputably a victory for the Union Army. So it meets the second two definitions, but not the first. Given the breadth of the three definitions, in the American Civil War alone, there were at least a dozen decisive victories, so I wonder whether this list actually adds any value. In any event, citations would be needed to justify these subjective judgments. Hal Jespersen (talk) 00:19, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  point of this article 

message: Could the Vietnam war be considered a Decisive VICTORYFor Communist Vietnamease?(dated,decidedThur12:04P>M>PST>Dec31,200921stcnt.Dr.Edson Andre'Johnson D.D.ULC.Romapax (talk) 20:05, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Could Vietnam be considred a "Decisive Victory" for Vietnamease? 

message: Edit notes for reference.
Contested text:
The contested text in in a section about the definition of "Decisive victory". The contested text does nothing to help explain the definition by Colin Gray that it has been tacked onto, and isn't a response to Gray. More importantly, the section of the source being used isn't about the definition of Decisive victory. It's irrelevant and/or synthesis and should be removed. 
I urge the editor in question to remove the text and abide by WP:BRD instead of edit warring.
(Hohum @) 13:16, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definitions
Talk:Community Lab School (Virginia)

message: This article is basically a promo for this Glasser Institute place.  There is literally nothing stated at all about this school that isn't extremely vague and that all schools will say they try and accomplish.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.104.85.67 (talk) 14:10, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality 

message: I'm not familiar with this school, but the "Glasser Quality School" link is dead. I think the new link should be: http://wglasser.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=15&Itemid=30 but wanted to make sure before changing. (Nicolaususry (talk) 02:52, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link
Talk:Furore

message: It might be an idea to disambiguate this page somehow (e.g. move it to a new "Furore (Italy)" page?), as "furore" is also a word in the English language, and this is the English-language version of Wikipedia. Just a thought. 88.104.215.121 (talk) 14:14, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Guardia Lombardi

message: The version of this article on the Italian Wikipedia is much more comprehensive. I will try to translate it as well as bring over its citations. Ergo Sum  04:28, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I have finished translating the article. Ergo Sum  05:56, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation of article 

message: Do you mean "in Italy"? Could you please verify this. 
213.71.6.130 (talk) 06:50, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed that statement, as I was unable to find a source for it. Ergo Sum  17:01, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "... the first barbarian people to convert to Catholicism"?
Talk:Henry L. Marsh

message: Henry L. Marsh and Henry Marsh III are articles about the same person, one pointed to from Virginia Legislative Black Caucus and the other from Senate of Virginia. I propose that Henry Marsh III (which is barely a stub, but does have an infobox) be merged into this article and converted to a redirect. I will begin the merge myself some time after 16 November (2 weeks from posting this) unless I see objections here. Of course, if someone else wants to take the initiative, I won't object. Rklear (talk) 06:40, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This merge is now complete. Henry Marsh III will be changed to a redirect to this article. Rklear (talk) 23:21, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article merge 
Talk:Harassed a Reporter

message: randy said he might make a listof all the good things he has done nad go around screwing those peoplecould this be a refrence to the episode Bad Karma?63.166.254.137 22:26, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Here Comes the Hotstepper

message: Note for the future: Commodores Machine Gun
--149.254.200.236 (talk) 06:04, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Song basis

message: Serval other songs are based on it:
#. Muévelo (Daddy Yankee and Nicky Jam song)
#. Further Up (Na, Na, Na, Na, Na) (Static & Ben El, Pitbull song)
Sokuya (talk) 14:47, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Samples 

message: Really nobody knows that it is a copy of a very old Turkish song?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SDtcjY4NJeQ  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.235.62.205 (talk) 15:59, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old Turkish song 

message: 😃 219.77.219.236 (talk) 08:32, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  I like sonic 2
Talk:Arboretum Sewer Trestle

message: The location appears to be incorrect. I believe it should be 47° 38' 22.236", -122° 17' 48.786". I got those coordinates by finding the trestle in Google Satellite View. However, when I enter those coordinates into Google Maps it plots a pointer at the wrong location. I am unsure how to fix this problem. This is my first Wikipedia foray so please forgive any mistakes I have made. Billtheqat (talk) 23:41, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location Error 
Talk:Jose Rizal Bridge

message: See here. • Lawrence Cohen 05:32, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: I don't quite know how to reference this...  But this bridge is extremely popular with Seattle are photographers both for light trails on the highways below, and for it's view of Downtown Seattle.
24.16.164.87 (talk) 06:06, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photography 

message: I feel it's not accurate to say that "the official name is not well known by Seattleites". The bridge is plainly signed as 'Dr. Jose Rizal Bridge', and 'Dr. Jose Rizal Park' is very close by. Although the bridge is still often referred to as the 12th Ave. bridge, I'd say it's at least equally well-known as the Jose Rizal bridge. I hope to dig up some sources supporting this view, and will change text if I do. Tomseattle (talk) 12:04, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I just updated the broken link to the source that claims the bridge's name isn't well known. From various Google search results, it seems that "12th Avenue Bridge" is mentioned far more commonly in media (Times, TV stations, blogs, etc.), so I think the claim has merit. SounderBruce 02:45, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bridge name
Talk:Chinese translation theory

message: Hand-book of Chinese Buddhism: being a Sanskrit-Chinese dictionary with vocabularies of Buddhist terms in Pali, Singhalese, Siamese, Burmese, Tibetan, Mongolian and Japanese By Ernest John Eitel, K. Takakuwa
http://books.google.com/books?id=g7UWAAAAYAAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=MA_Muu_gIhQC&printsec=frontcover&dq=sanskrit+chinese+dictionary&hl=en&sa=X&ei=tZ2yUNzNL4-I0QHIoYHwAg&ved=0CDsQ6AEwAw
http://books.google.com/books?id=BJEHxCuf604C&printsec=frontcover&dq=sanskrit+chinese+dictionary&hl=en&sa=X&ei=tZ2yUNzNL4-I0QHIoYHwAg&ved=0CDgQ6AEwAg
http://books.google.com/books?id=5CWSouKJOScC&printsec=frontcover&dq=sanskrit+chinese+dictionary&hl=en&sa=X&ei=tZ2yUNzNL4-I0QHIoYHwAg&ved=0CDUQ6AEwAQ
http://books.google.com/books?id=BnM_AAAAYAAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=sanskrit+chinese+dictionary&hl=en&sa=X&ei=tZ2yUNzNL4-I0QHIoYHwAg&ved=0CDIQ6AEwAA
http://books.google.com/books?id=6iE-AAAAIAAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=sanskrit+chinese+dictionary&hl=en&sa=X&ei=tZ2yUNzNL4-I0QHIoYHwAg&ved=0CEcQ6AEwBw#v=onepage&q=sanskrit%20chinese%20dictionary&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=4ArxvCxV1l4C&pg=PA665#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=BATQPQAACAAJ
http://books.google.com/books?id=Kwqc7xso22wC&pg=PA2548#v=onepage&q&f=false
Information on chinese sanskrit dictionaries
http://books.google.com/books?id=xe4yygAACAAJ
http://books.google.com/books?id=2INOV5txvD4C&pg=PA271#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=FAud8CE5stsC&pg=PA270#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=mycQAQAAMAAJ
http://books.google.com/books?id=XjjwjC7rcOYC&pg=PR10#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=kl9RXSmfeZ0C&pg=PR15#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=8PI-WPJd4aIC&pg=PA217#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=2Y-_pqi2wYAC&pg=PR18#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=VHj5DWDJjnIC&pg=PA133#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=SBrsuZfSt6AC&pg=PA311#v=onepage&q&f=false
English
http://books.google.com/books?id=ECAUAAAAYAAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
Rajmaan (talk) 06:04, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chinese sanskrit dictionaries for buddhist vocabulary
Talk:Norm Lewis

message: He's stated as a baritone, but surely he's a Bass-baritone?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.114.34.88 (talk) 22:12, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Voice
Talk:Automatically switched optical network

message: I wikified and removed tag, but the text is not "user friendly".  I tried to reformat, but it needs an expert to expand and clarify. --Cbradshaw 22:47, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite 

message: This article needs to be re-assessed. It was a stub, which has been expanded significantly by me. Admins are request to re-assess its quality and importance. Thanks Digimanpk (talk) 14:13, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for Assessment 

message: The article states: "whenever a user requires more bandwidth". More bandwidth above some pre-defined or designated limit? Who decides that? Why would this initiate a new connection? Who makes such a request? The network operating system? These details would clarify this article greatly. --Daydreamer302000 (talk) 08:10, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification request 
Talk:Lockheed X-17

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Polaris FTV-3 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 30#Polaris FTV-3 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  signed, Rosguill talk 17:56, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Polaris FTV-3" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Gnomic aspect

message: Is this really an example of a general pattern of past tense general truths? Isn't it just a specific saying, poetically evoking "a story we all know about a cat"? How do I know the last Wikipedian didn't just invent this? Here is where a citation would really be helpful.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.38.38.180 (talk) 21:17, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Curiosity killed the cat" 

message: As far as I know, Ancient Greek doesn't use the future tense, but the aorist to denote the gnomic aspect. Unfortunately, I only have one German reference (Bornemann & Risch, 1978. Griechische Grammatik, 2nd ed. Frankfurt/M.: Diesterweg; p. 218f.).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Backyard-pirate (talk • contribs) 10:48, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: But that isn't a grammatical form, any more than English present is a gnomic tense. — kwami (talk) 17:48, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gnomic tense in Ancient Greek 

message: If the gnomic (or the generic) is a linguistic feature unique to ancient Greek, then the article should say so. If it is not, then it'd be great to give some additional example(s). As the article stands today, it says, "English doesn't have it. Ancient Greek (sort of) did." Not very informative about the feature's universality.—PaulTanenbaum (talk) 15:22, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Some analysis of Hopi consider the -ŋʷi suffix to mark gnomic aspect. ·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 16:01, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does it exist beyond ancient Greek?
Talk:Hiller X-18

message: How come this aircraft did not become a museum piece or exhibit at any museum, but just scrapped instead?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clrichey (talk • contribs) 06:29, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Museum piece or exhibit?
Talk:618th Air Operations Center

message: Request change name of page: 618 Air and Space Operations Center (Tanker Airlift Control Center)
to: 618 Air Operations Center (Tanker Airlift Control Center)
Reason: This center name has changed due to Air Force Doctrine, no longer using 'and Space' in the names of the Air Operations Centers.
Thanks!
FloydSoup (talk) 20:40, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request on 17 July 2013
Talk:Curtiss-Wright X-19

message: When I read that the X-19A was a monoplane with two sets of wings, I was surprised. As far as I know, a monoplane has only one set of wings. --Born2flie (talk) 15:20, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: the answer may be is: with the term "biplane" you denominate what in german is called "double-decker": two wings above each other. so some may use the term monoplane to distinguish single-layered wings from double-layered ones. in that sense a tandem wing is a monoplane... --HilmarHansWerner (talk) 14:04, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Monoplane v. # of sets of wings 

message: any ideas why the program was cancelled? was there a basic disadvantage to the tandem design?? thank you! --HilmarHansWerner (talk) 14:04, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: "program cancelled" - why?
Talk:Pied-de-Vent

message: Hello, i am a French-speaking wikipedist.  A wanted to translate this stub about cheese, but it was automatically called promotional ans deleted. Is there a consistency within different langages?
Matthieu Deuté (talk) 02:58, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Why this article could not be translated in French?
Talk:My Extra Mile

message: Under trivia it says something about turk being an intern. Its season 5, he is a RESIDENT and so is Bonnie and The Todd.
:You're right, but the whole item is pointless anyway, so i removed it--Jac16888 23:27, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: is JD's girlfriend in this episode denise richards?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Whitey138 (talk • contribs) 00:30, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Denise Richards=
Talk:Panela cheese

message: Is this similar or the same as Queso blanco? Even if not, perhaps a link should be added somewhere, they look as if they're related. --Cyberman TM (talk) 15:56, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I came here with the same question. A number of this say that that queso panela, queso canasta, and queso de la canasta. I'm going to change it for now. It seems most reasonable.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.191.199.95 (talk) 02:42, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Queso blanco ?
Talk:Post-mortem (disambiguation)

message: There's no mention here of the project management post-mortem.  The meeting after the entire project is done where you discuss what went right/wrong.  That's a very common usage, where a magazine will say "in this week's Entertainment Weekly we do a post mortem of Ant Man!"--Mrcolj (talk) 16:55, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Project Management 

message: I understood that a 'post-mortem' (in UK, at least) was a legal process, seeking through facts and documentation to determine the cause of death, and likely drawing on the results of a 'post-mortem examination', the physical part. There's some evidence for this, but I couldn't find enough to create a new line here, or article. So I've left it as 'post-mortem' means 'post-mortem examination'.  
If anyone can justify the creation of a separate definition for the legal process, please let me know. - Onanoff (talk) 18:22, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Post-mortem - legal process
Talk:The Clutch

message: added references, and showed notability
74.225.174.179 23:28, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: redirects here but has substantial text after the #REDIRECT directive. Please can an editor familiar with the subject un-redirect, merge, delete or otherwise deal with the content?  Pinging the main contributor, .  Thanks, Certes (talk) 11:58, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: ; thanks to . Certes (talk) 20:57, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Candice Nelson (songwriter)
Talk:Schabziger

message: if this cheese, different from all other cheeses I ever read about, I think, is made from the WHEY (?!), then what is done with the curds?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:3030:1:709B:1:1:ACBB:D52E (talk) 01:21, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  made from the whey??
Talk:Stracchino

message: Is the use of stracchino permitted in pizza?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.127.20.126 (talk) 12:25, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Taleggio cheese

message: The cheese has a mould, or "bloom", on the rind. Does anyone have any references to add information on this? --89.240.54.143 (talk) 14:00, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mould
Talk:Tilsit cheese

message: Havarti and Tilsiter cheese may have similarities but they are distinctly different cheeses. One is semi-soft and the other is semi-hard. Their flavors are also distinctly different. Dr. Dan (talk) 00:14, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed the whole section. The reference given was the production standard, which made no mention of regional varieties. Pyrope 14:34, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That makes sense and was a good idea. I also think that the links to the Danish cheese category is not correct. Simply put, if a Stilton is made in Wisconsin it doesn't become an "American" cheese, any more than an Emmentaler becomes a Finnish cheese if it is manufactured in Finland. As for Tylzycki that is just a foreign language variant for the name of Tilsiter cheese and seems another odd entry on English WP. Dr. Dan (talk) 17:29, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Havarti]]

message: According to the cheese shop in my neighbourhood (specialized in cheese), Tilsitter is Danish, not Swiss. So who is right here? Paolingstein (talk) 14:36, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Swiss cheese?
Talk:Destructive dilemma

message: There is some problem with the notation used for propositions or propositional variables in this article using big letters P, Q, R, S,.. usually asigned to predicate symbols P, Q, R,..while propositions are denoted with small symbols p, q, r, s. The edit specifying this notation I see it has been reverted.--185.53.196.112 (talk) 21:20, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notation for propositions with small letters p, q, r,.....in contrast with predicate letters denoted with big letters P, Q, R,...
Talk:Universal generalization

message: It is not explained why the deduction theorem does not apply in this case. ---- NoizHed (talk) 18:13, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Generalization

message: Under "Generalization with hypotheses" an example of what can go wrong if the "second restriction" (x [should] not occur in φ) is not followed. It seems to me that this is not a good example to demonstrate the need for the restriction, because if it is corrected so that step 4. uses a variable that does not occur in φ, e.g. 4. were rewritten as "(ForEvery V) V is not equal to x", the second restriction would be respected but the deduction would still be unsound. Tom Cohoe (talk) 11:32, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Example is not good? 

message: In the example given, the last two lines are redundant, because the question was asking to prove A is derivable from B and C, which line 9 establishes that. LoMaPh (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 02:49, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Example of a Proof 

message: The first restriction needs to be restated because it seems to allow the following invalid reasoning:\\
Assume ∃z P(z) \\
P(x)\\
∀y P(y)
ProfRB (talk) 21:06, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  The First Restriction 

message: The references are 
Copi and Cohen
Hurley
Moore and Parker
(I kid you not.)  How is the reader supposed to know what works are being referred to?  31.50.156.39 (talk) 15:42, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:Conjunction elimination

message: To my knowledge, the rule the article is about is usually called "conjunction elimination", or "and elimination"; Sect.3.1.2.1, p.46 I have never seen it called "simplification". The article had no references at all before 4 Mar 2012, when  gave at least three slovenly ones, which remained unimproved up to now. So since it's pretty impossible to verify the use of "simplification", that name shouldn't be claimed in the article, and the title should be renamed. After all, "simplification" is a rather general term which is "occupied" here without any verifiable source. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 12:27, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggest to rename to "Conjunction elimination"
Talk:Transposition (logic)

message: I have archived the 14-years-old merge discussion, but I want to discuss exactly the same thing again: I think we should merge Contraposition into Transposition (logic). However distinct the pages may have originally looked, a glance at the beginning of their contents shows that they're talking about the same formula in propositional logic. Those are simply two different names in use for the same concept. Thiagovscoelho (talk) 00:44, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Reverse the merge - Contraposition is the WP:COMMONNAME and has about 10x the page traffic, so this article should be merged to that one, not the other way around. Psychastes (talk) 22:36, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I've done it like you said. Thiagovscoelho (talk) 06:21, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Universal instantiation

message: These:
:1. Copi and Cohen
:2. Hurley
:3. Moore and Parker
:4. pg. 71. Symbolic Logic; 5th ed.
cannot be acceptable references.  What by Copi and Cohen, Hurley, and Moore and Parker?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.185.221.149 (talk) 13:56, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poor references
Talk:Bar stool

message: Bar stool or barstool? -Ich (talk) 23:55, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: Does anyone know the name of the design of the modern bar stools pictured in the article on July 29, 2011, or even where it can be purchased? It is a very unique and attractive design which is hard to find a picture of anywhere other than on this page.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.173.195.201 (talk) 23:37, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Design of modern bar stools pictured in article

message: I do not doubt the article's accuracy, but most third-party information is on commercial sites. Is it okay to cite those? Or is the question of neutrality an issue?  Middleground1 (talk) 19:11, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need for citations 

message: cebolenu Dube  41.116.38.201 (talk) 19:28, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  C