lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Tie Your Mother Down

message: Should we include information about the video, e.g. that an on - stage explosion literally blew Roger Taylor off the stage? TopGearFreak (talk) 11:49, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Video Information? 

message: Why can´t Queensongs.info be specified as a source?
:Have a read of WP:RS. Doctorhawkes (talk) 10:25, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: It isn't. Again, read WP:RS. Doctorhawkes (talk) 03:00, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Queensongs.info
Talk:Rock and Roll (Led Zeppelin song)

message: Manowar cover you can hear here - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KM4JwtEEHG0. I think we can't use boothleg link in the article as source. But this cover do exist ;). 82.131.21.220 (talk) 21:20, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: First off, the genre which appears to say 'Rock and roll' is actually wikilinked to British rock and roll in violation of WP:EASTEREGG. The real question, though, is which of these should we use?
The other issue is Heavy metal: it was deleted again by an IP, Should it stay or go?  Radiopathy •talk•   15:08, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genres 
Talk:You Shook Me

message: Currently there are two infoboxes in this article. Because the article is quite short, the second one stretches the page down further and looks pretty bad. Another problem is that there are three notable versions of this song. Adding an infobox for Jeff Beck Group would make the first problem worse, but it would improve the quality of the article. Would it be better to add the Jeff Beck infobox or to have only the Muddy Waters one?ufossuck 06:16, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infoboxes 

message: I think Nicky Hopkins deserves a mention for his contribution on piano to the Jeff Beck Group recording of the song, don't you? Johnalexwood (talk) 20:27, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nicky Hopkins
Talk:Fëanor

message: Is that IPA correct?Halbared (talk) 10:48, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know if there's a source where Tolkien talks about pronouncing Fëanor specificially. What's there seems reasonable to me. Generally, vowels in Quenya are short and there are no dipthongs. Sennalen (talk) 13:37, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you on clarifying the diphthong for me. The umlaut, would this separate the 'f' and the 'e'?Halbared (talk) 20:36, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The diaresis (umaut) is a decorative optional reminder not to make a dipthong or a silent vowel. I was overgeneralizing that there are no dipthongs, but ea is never a dipthong. Here's more: http://tolklang.quettar.org/pronguide.html Sennalen (talk) 20:48, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Ta, sure, I did check about the dipthongs and understood that you meant 'in this case' that there was no dipthong. I checked about the umlaut usage in English and German, with respect to English usage, but I see now Umlaut (linguistics) and Diaeresis (diacritic) have different pages. After looking at the Diaeresis page, it still makes sense to me for the break, but after briefly skimming that most useful link about Quenya pronunciation, I see it might not be. It is a most useful link that I was looking for, thank you. Do you know of any audio links where Tolkien speaks the name, again, thank you for pointing out the above.Halbared (talk) 15:42, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know of any. There's a recording of him reciting Namárië, for a general feel for how he pronounced quenya. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mVACqgDqLno Sennalen (talk) 16:39, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  ... which recording mainly shows how rapidly and indistinctly Tolkien spoke... but he pronounces the second word, , with a diaeresis, if a remarkably quick and weak one. Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:57, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation
Talk:Days Go By (Dirty Vegas song)

message: So nobody knows who the "older" dancer is as opposed to the younger one?
Hasn't Dirty Vegas remixed "Days Go By" as an acoustic guitar driven ballad?  I know there's a remix that has been playing on the HBO seres' promos.  And the clip I've heard on Amazon from the album Alice @ 97.3: This Is Alice Music, Vol. 6 sounds as though it is the same song.  However, since I don't have the CD, I can't be certain, nor am I sure if Dirty Vegas redid the song or if someone else performed the cover.
:Scumfrog's remix has an acoustic guitar part in the middle. 24.205.52.47 04:24, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Planet Telex

message: I have reinstated the article as on July 17th, 2008, although I am aware that the article will need a lot of work. Help will be appreciated. —Imdanumber1 (talk • contribs • email) 22:28, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article reinstation 

message: "Some thought its more atmospheric keyboard-dominated sound, compared to other tracks on The Bends, was an indication of the band's future sound..."
Despite the fact that Planet Telex is a very guitar driven song. Explain? Knotrice (talk) 02:29, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong.
Talk:Welcome to Paradise

message: Is it really necessary to say it's playable in Green Day Rock Band? Pretty much all the singles are playable in Rock Band, but not all of them say it. --24.255.37.229 (talk) 01:17, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Green Day Rock Band 

message: I really don't think the full lyrics of the song need to be there. Simply explaining the meaning will suffice. And if they have to stay, it needs some SERIOUS cleanup. 208.54.40.208 (talk) 22:25, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lyrics
Talk:Merry Go Round in Oz

message: Merry Go Round In Oz has no dashes in the name.  The redirect should be from this one to the correct one.
:Thank you for your suggestion regarding the book's title! When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make whatever changes you feel are needed.  Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit any article by simply following the  link at the top. You don't even need to log in! (Although there are some reasons why you might like to…) The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills.  New contributors are always welcome. — JonMoore 02:05, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Gaius Octavian (Rome character)

message: In the comparison you mention that Octavian was not present at the battle of Munda. However, the Wikipedia entry indicates that Octavian was in charge of the Cavalry at the rear.
Just wondering what sources are used for each, and whether entries should be corrected (but which ones?), or the conflicting versions mentioned?
:I took my information from Augustus, Godfather of Europe by Richard Holland, but I've just double checked. Suetonius and Dio Cassius are both ambiguous about whether Octavian did any fighting at Munda, and neither Appian nor Plutarch mention his presence at all. Smith's Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology  says "Whether he arrived in Caesar's camp in time to take part in the battle of Munda or not is a disputed point, though the former seems to be more probable", and cites only Suetonius and Dio Cassius. It seems Holland was overstating his case a bit, but I don't know where the editors of the Battle of Munda page got their information that he commanded cavalry from. I'll revise this page and do a bit more digging. --Nicknack009 18:32, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: The [[battle of Munda]]

message: I corrected some information in the infobox.
*I removed his father's name. To begin with, his father isn't a character on Rome and secondly the link was to the real biography of the real Augustus' father. This is fiction!
*I added Timon as an ally. 
*I removed both Atia and Octavia as allies and this should be common sense. Naturally they would be allies unless they were enemies, in which case, that would be noteworthy.
*Finally there was a missing line break and I fixed that too. 
MagnoliaSouth | Talk 22:43, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox

message: There were some serious NPOV issues, and I worked on those, but also there were missing links and general grammar issues as well. One thing I noticed for certain is that the character information is relying too heavily on plot points of the show. The idea of a character page is to give encyclopedic information about that character. Would anyone like to work on this with me? I see that this character is not alone, but most Rome characters are written this way as well. I'm more than happy to have volunteers. MagnoliaSouth | Talk 22:43, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV and too many plot points

message: Deleted. It's of no relevance to the character of Octavian.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.146.224.18 (talk) 04:26, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Trivia

message: I was trying to find where in the article it mentions how this character belongs to :Category:Religious workers? --Slivicon (talk) 20:28, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Religious workers
Talk:Lin Onus

message: I have a birthdate of December 4, 1948, but no source.
Rbraunwa 16:41, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Matej Ninoslav

message: I also think this deserves a POV tag in the least. The site is clearly biased and has an agenda behind it. I mean, the core of the article revolves around one single documnet (out of dozens) that allegedly implies that Bosnia's population was Serb in the middle ages. First of all, why does this even matter? Why should this take up 90% of the page on a ruler? Surely there is more to say about his life than one document which some allege proves the ethnic composition of his state? And furthermore, the historiographical conclusions this article makes are ridiculeous. Live Forever 16:49, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, but it is the only preserved document of Matej Ninoslav. And there are other sources if you don't like that one; all pointing out that part (actually, that's because of the 1990s nationalism is that it is being pointed out; but nonetheless, it's true). I removed the Tag unless someone has a dispute opened. Objections? HolyRomanEmperor 21:04, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I stand by my objection. You can't remove the tag merely by providing links to sites called "Serbdom" and "Serb Bosnia". The nature of the charter in question is heavily disputed, and the current article clearly takes one side without even mentioning any controversy or why this view is contested. Live Forever 22:01, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

text: I'll try to rewrite the article to confirm to NPOV sometime later. Live Forever 22:26, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  In the mean-time, how about a POV than totally disputed? HolyRomanEmperor 12:05, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have removed the unencyclopedic controversy part. I suggest that we work it on here first; and then include it in the article. HolyRomanEmperor 23:33, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see how the explanation was POV, but either way that section is fine by me as it is right now. However, I believe that Bogumil is a POV term since there is much debate and controversy about the Bosnian church. Many historains have argued in recent years that the Bosnian church had no connection to Bogumilism so I don't think the article should stick to such a specific term - especially when synonyms exist. Live Forever 05:28, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think that you're right. But I took the sources from the exact quotes of the ruler and the Pope; and they clearly wrote "...Bogumil...". I will not rv your edits without your aproval (or could you do it; in case you agree?) HolyRomanEmperor 12:33, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Serbs and Vlachs
Talk:Centauro event

message: Why would these experiments verify the existence of hidden dimensions? This seems like rather a strong assertion, not to have any support. Joshuardavis 16:55, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Existence of hidden dimensions

message: If the solution has indeed been found, please fix the previous incorrect statement. 18:32, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: "Exploding holes" vs "Solution to the Centauro puzzle"
Talk:Michelle Ang

message: Who made Ms Ang a year older?  Anyone got a proper birthday for her? Lao Wai 16:55, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: IMBD had her listed as born 84, as does tv.com and cinemorgue.com. But michellang.org and the BBC Neighbours site have it as 83. I'd think I'd trust those sites who say 83 over those who say 84, but I'm not sure which is correct...I'm going to check on The Tribe message board to see if peope there know. Evil Eye 18:19, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This is quite interesting and covers her latest film roles -  JuneGloom  Talk 19:03, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: Beautiful 148.75.185.12 (talk) 17:34, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hi
Talk:Abdulqawi Yusuf

message: I've read the archive on the 2005 deletion discussion.  Two quick factors on notability.  First, I agree with one of the commentors that his membership in the Institut de Droit International alone should qualify.  See number three of the Academic Notability Criteria.  The Institut de Droit International qualifies as such society.  That aside though, he has since become a judge of an international court, specifically the International Court of Justice.  This meets number one under General Notabitiy for policians (and judges).  Granted that's listed as a secondary basis, but in this case it should suffice.  IMHO (talk) 00:37, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: This page has been vandalized in order to mischaracterize the subject's birthplace and background. I would, therefore, propose that the following unsubstantiated sentence is deleted as it lacks a reliable source: "Yusuf hails from the Majeerteen sub clan of Darod." Navy2018 (talk) 22:37, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Done But in the future, refrain from calling edits you are challenging "vandalism" without good reason.  Vandalism has a specific meaning on Wikipedia and this isn't it.  Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 18:26, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 15 February 2018
Talk:Jianzi

message: This article is all about the organized competitive sports, but I think jianzi is usually played by children more like freestyle footbag.  And what about the jianzi itself?  Sometimes it is made with feathers.  In China, children make it with plastic twine and washers or coins.   This article is so large and complicated that I don't dare to edit it, and I don't know if these things are mentioned somewhere in the article already. Kicknet 20:31, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other topics 

message: The bulk of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jianzi#Formal_game reads like an advert for the JJJ variant.
I doubt it warrants mentioning at all?
-- Ralph Corderoy (talk) 07:50, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Embedded advert?
Talk:Bell P-39 Airacobra

message: According to the T9 link the cannon was manufactured by Colt. I'm sure the info here is correct but it would be nice if the two articles concurred. Maybe a note on the cannon page listing other manufacturers? 75.143.19.122 (talk) 18:13, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oldsmobile Cannon 

message: Note 1 refers to some sources saying the date of the First Flight was 6th April 1939 and refers to this "Talk" pages for a discussion that apparently concluded the date was in 1938. - That discussion seems to have been deleted. The topic was bought up in the British aviation Magazine "Air International" in 1977. -  A letter printed in the November 1977 edition was sent in by a Mr Don M Ives of Bridgeport Ct USA. He enclosed a newspaper cutting from the New York Times of 16th April 1939 - The cutting reads- that the Bell XP-39.... "had been shipped to Wright Field, Dayton by rail in January and had undergone extensive ground testing and engineering work prior to its first flight", and that "much to the surprise of observers here, it was flown first during the Army Day observance last week." 77.100.216.20 (talk) 18:25, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The previous discussion was archived, not deleted. You can see it at Talk:Bell_P-39_Airacobra/Archive_2#First_flight_date_and_early_history. By December 2012 we had arrived at the solution of showing the 1938 date and adding the note about conflicting 1939 sources. Some very detailed accounts of the Bell timeline confirm 1938. Binksternet (talk) 20:00, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of First Flight?
Talk:Ross

message: I'm removing boldface, since it's a pov (it says some people are more important than other). Velho 17:25, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bolding 

message: There is a suggestion in Talk:Ross (area), under "Requested move II", that Ross should be moved to Ross (disambiguation), so that Ross (area) can be moved to Ross. Any comment/objection? Laurel Bush 17:48, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to [[Ross (disambiguation)]]? 

message: I find no Ross Kelly sequence worker orginally added by IP 62.172.209.197 on 25 May 2006, so absent additional identification as to fictional work, I have deleted it.  Bejnar 15:51, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of Ross Kelly

message: "Ross" also means "Horse" in German, however it is spelled "Roß." the ß means "ss" in German. Should I add this? Astrodog93 21:38, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  German 

message: Does this need to be on this page? There is already a Fictional characters section on the Ross (name) page. danno 11:39, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fictional characters
Talk:Vladimir Romanov

message: What's? 83.242.76.83 10:22, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roman = Vladimir? 

message: Did I miss something?  What is this "Kniazevičiūtė"?
And do we care?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.148.236.254 (talk) 12:06, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kniazevičiūtė 

message: Why is his wealth listed in pounds, a currency that seems to have nothing to do with him? 5.173.130.112 (talk) 21:51, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wealth listed in pounds?
Talk:Rocko James Wallabee

message: I've been watching this show scince I was born.  And I never knew his full name, or his family.  I hope this is all correct, not made up by a wikipedian. — Hurricane Devon (Talk) 17:34, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: http://64.233.187.104/search?q=cache:_NvpjptJFmEJ:www.thethingsiwant.com/gifting/cview.php4%3FITID%3D482077+%22Rocko+James+Wallabee%22&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=5 - Doubt it. WhisperToMe 15:59, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: I think it's all bogus information. I wish they would stop spreading it... --205.188.116.195 07:05, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Probably not.
Talk:Mitochondria Eve

message: This only shows the images from the game...--FlareNUKE 08:47, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: You're correct. I'll do a google search and see if I can find the movie image. -ZeroTalk 11:24, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Movie Images 

message: I removed the tags. They were added by an editor recently, but there's no summary or comment here on the talk which says why the article would need them. Unless that editor explains, or (I think would be better) ammends what he/she thinks is wrong they should stay off. -84.169.231.181 18:13, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  tags 

message: Either here or at minor characters, I suppose.  That article is fairly short and could easily fit in...  SnowFire 20:54, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge in Melissa Pearce?
Category talk:Egyptian artefact types

message: There is now a reference to the "Solar barge".
However the Barque wiki is not developed for Eqypt.  There appears to be some varieties:
*The "Shrine bark", or "Shrine barque".
*"Barque" for carrying the King, Pharaoh. (Not just the kings's Solar Barge.)
*"Barque" for usage on the Nile.
*Special large "Barques" were made to carry the Obelisks.
*The ships interred at the Pyramids ? ?
It appears only 7 pages have wiki's to the european barque: ( Barque ), Set (mythology), Hatshepsut, and Seker.  But there are many refences to the barque, without the wiki.
Next pages: Amenhotep I, Ineni, Senemut, KV6.
:I haven't re-read each page, but I would guess thsee "barques" can't just be replaced by the Solar Barge, which is just one of the many types of "barques" for Egypt.  At any rate, It does make for humor, to clik (sic) on Barque and see a many-sailed, detailed ship, of the seas. MMcAnnis,YumaAZMmcannis 05:05, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Egypt: [[Barque|barque]] reference
Talk:Tilt table test

message: At the moment, the article says that the patient is normally suspended at an angle between 60 and 80 degrees.
From the name of the test, and the description of what it's trying to diagnose, I suspect that the patient actually starts out by lying flat for a while before being elevated to the 60-80 degree angle - since otherwise, there would be no change in position to induce the fainting spell. But since I have zero knowledge of the subject, I don't dare make it say that. Can someone who actually knows how the test is performed make the necessary clarifications? --Alvestrand 20:06, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, yes, but not really.  It's not strictly necessary for you to be lying flat at the beginning for the tilt table test to work.  It's just more convenient to strap a person to the table if the person is lying flat on the table, with the table raised to save the technician's lower back.  Holding perfectly still at about 70 degrees (not quite upright) is just a quick way to stress the mechanism that keeps blood from pooling in your legs while also turning off some common (possibly unconscious) compensation tricks.  I'm sure you've heard of people fainting from standing too long in a hot room?  This test is just an efficient way to bring about the same thing (without, of course, the risk that you'll get a bloody your nose when you pass out).  WhatamIdoing (talk) 21:16, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article is unclear 

message: I removed the NPOV tag because there's no explanation here and no obvious problem in that section.  Perhaps it's already been fixed?  Perhaps someone can enlighten us?  WhatamIdoing (talk) 21:19, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV?

message: The first paragraph under applications doesn't make much sense. I think it's been copied and pasted from another location without context. What are the findings it's referring to? Where did these fighter pilots studied come from? It needs more than a footnote to justify its inclusion.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.94.4.125 (talk) 14:55, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Fighter pilots?

message: What does HIS mean here? Even HIS refers to Bundle of His? the meaning is unclear.--Lonestarnot (talk) 20:04, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: HIS?
Talk:Mandal (municipality)

message: Anyone ever heard of this place??
Could it be outside of Mandal, Norway?  Is the name I have mis-spelled?
If tou dont get my email address, please respond at:  snwood@dcwisp.net
Thank you
There is a place (valley) called Saksumdalen in Lillehammer municipality. (The letter x is never used in Norwegian place names.)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.215.140.55 (talk) 09:17, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Saxumadalen, Norway 
Talk:1940 Winter Olympics

message: 1940 Winter Olympics
.were going to be heald in germany
. were canceled thanks to WW II —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.187.86.254 (talk • contribs)  Revision as of 05:54, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: germany

message: The Japanese translation says it's the Fifth games, text box says third and the article says 6th. RyanConnell5150 (talk) 01:08, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which Winter Olympic Games is it?