Talk:Gasolina

message: :Image:Daddy Yankee-Gasolina.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 07:17, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Daddy Yankee-Gasolina.jpg

message: El cangri386's comment on arimareiji's talk page :
Hey arimareiji. I've got a major concern about two articles I'm dealing with on Wikipedia, which are Gasolina and Gasolina (Papa A.P. song). I've had a concern with a cover version of a song having its own article, when I felt it would be right to instead merge it with Gasolina since the writers of both version (one of them being Daddy Yankee himself) are the same. I've even used Respect (song) as an example for the subject of original artists and notable covers. I discussed this with Kartel King and Europe22 and this has turned into a major edit war that has lasted for a long time now. I was referred to you by Europe22, asking for a third opinion on my edits to both Gasolina and Gasolina (Papa A.P. song). I've redirected the Papa A.P. version to a section in the original Gasolina article (which I'm afraid will be reverted sometime later on again by Kartel King). Please reply soon. We need a third opinion! :) El cangri386 Sign! or Talk 21:59, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: P.S. I was referred to you because you were also in a little argument with Kartel King once before and you, Kartel King and Europe22 discussed over this situation and decided to leave the Papa A.P. song to its own article. El cangri386 Sign! or Talk 22:13, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

text: El cangri386, I think you should follow Arimareiji's advice : to ask for a RfC. Europe22 (talk) 18:53, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Arimareiji, I would appreciate it if you did not talk about me in that manner as I have said nothing to insult you. I have stuck to sources and I have made sure Europe22 has stuck to sources which had not been until I intervened. It is quite obvious you are against me and I knew of this when we left discussions back in October, you know how I proved you wrong. And the fact plagiarism is a NON-legal term, yes I know you remember because you are still hostile towards me. It's okay though, I don't expect everyone to willing accept they have been proven wrong and not hold a grudge, although as I am a bigger person and if the roles were reversed I would not hold a grudge. Arimareiji, what you fail to notice is that there is not ONE source for yours, El cangri386's and Europe22's POV on it being a cover version, so even if there was a policy it could not apply as no where in the sources does it say it is a cover. I will not concede to biased logic, although I will mention that I have no problem with the current wording provided by Europe22 as he has removed his POV from the section once and for all. Kartel King (talk) 02:22, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge ?

message: The general rule of thumb is that cover versions of a song, even if they become more popular or better known than the original, all go in one article about the specific song. The article about the Papa A.P. version should be merged into this article. TheJazzDalek (talk) 20:40, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no policy or rules that specifically states this. A third opinion was not needed Elcangri386 posted it before I responded to him and has since not edited this article. I came to a compromise with Europe22 and we all left the article the way it was. Concensous was not to merge this article back in October, it should not be merged. Kartel King (talk) 05:46, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for comment 

message: Europe22 removed claims of platinum certification in the US and Australia, and rightly so. A check of the RIAA and ARIA databases show that the song was never certified (platinum or even gold, for that matter). Please do not re-add the claim without a verifiable reference from a reliable source. TheJazzDalek (talk) 12:37, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Certification 

message: According to Wikipedia in Spanish, this song was released on February 7, 2004. Therefore the earlier date was incorrect and take me the liberty of correcting it. Biruxx (talk) 01:57, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia, no matter what language, is not a reliable source as anybody can edit it. See WP:IRS. Erick (talk) 15:23, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect Date 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Gasolina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090715043100/http://www.disqueenfrance.com/fr/monopage.xml?id=259165&year=2005 to http://www.disqueenfrance.com/fr/monopage.xml?id=259165&year=2005
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080417014832/http://www.ultratop.be:80/fr/annual.asp?year=2005 to http://www.ultratop.be/fr/annual.asp?year=2005
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120404175659/http://www.disqueenfrance.com/fr/page-259376.xml?year=2005 to http://www.disqueenfrance.com/fr/page-259376.xml?year=2005
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:23, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: , here's a Billboard source that says the single "impacted radio in October." It also says that radio station WPYO in Orlando, Florida, was playing the song in September, likely sourcing it from the album which was released in July. Binksternet (talk) 17:25, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for pointing this out. I stopped checking Billboard for release dates around mid-2002. This date is plausible, so I'll add it to the Release history section. ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 17:54, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release date – radio in October 2004