Talk:Rotherham (UK Parliament constituency)

message: MacShane has defected and therefore references to independent articles on the page should be left, here is the proof
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_British_Members_of_Parliament_who_crossed_the_floor#2010-2015_Parliament  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lifeontheedge (talk • contribs) 17:03, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: You are confusing having the whip removed, as MacShane has, with crossing the floor. 
Rsloch (talk) 14:09, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Defection

message: The useful graph on this page shows the relative votes of the major parties over time, and also the total votes for other parties.  An editor has removed it on the grounds that the "others" are not a party.  I do not understand this objection; it is a common and widely understood convention to group "others" together, and is particularly useful on a graph, where it would not be possible to illustrate in an intelligible way the vote share of every other party and independent. Warofdreams talk 12:45, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The graph says 'Other' not 'Others'. 'Other' implies a single party which makes the graph misleading and hence why I removed it. 
Rsloch (talk) 16:04, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

text: 'Other' is a perfectly normal way to group small parties. See, for example, the BBC election calculator here: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/election_2010/8609989.stm —Jeremy (talk) 16:52, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

text: (after ec) I agree that the plural would be more correct, but as you're the first person to even spot this in almost six years since the original creation of these graphs, I don't agree that it is misleading.  The value of the graph far outweights the small chance that somebody might find the wording slightly confusing. Warofdreams talk 16:55, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably I'm being too picky then  Rsloch (talk) 14:07, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Graph

message: Substituted at 04:56, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Rotherham (UK Parliament constituency). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101106204053/http://www.boundarycommissionforengland.org.uk/electoral-figures/electoral-figures.htm to http://www.boundarycommissionforengland.org.uk/electoral-figures/electoral-figures.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160129132219/http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/guide-method/census/2011/census-data/2011-census-interactive-content/index.html to http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/guide-method/census/2011/census-data/2011-census-interactive-content/index.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101017084530/http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard/article-23887905-expenses-probe-into-mp-by-scotland-yard.do to http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard/article-23887905-expenses-probe-into-mp-by-scotland-yard.do
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:00, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified