Talk:History of Alberta

message: Can anyone explain how this statement is factual: "After the 1885 Northwest Rebellion was put down, settlers began to pour into Alberta. The closing of the American frontier around 1890 led 600,000 Americans to move to Saskatchewan and Alberta, where the farming frontier flourished 1897-1914.[17]"
When census data for Alberta show the population in 1914 to be under 200k? Something is not right and if not factual is at the very least misleading.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.101.50.181 (talk) 17:24, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Something not right

message: I'm interested in greatly expanding this article.  A rough outline is what I have in mind:
# pre-european settlement(until 1871)
# European Settlement before 1905(1871 - 1905)
# post 1905 growth (1905- 1920)
# The rise of prairie populism(1920-1935)
# Social Credit(1935-1947)
# The discovery of oil(1947 - 1972)
# Loughheed's conservatives(1972 -1982)
# Crash of the 80's(1982-1992)
# The Klein Era(1992-2006)
# Recent Developments(2006 - now)
Major themes: I believe there are two major themes to explore when addressing Alberta history 1) The relationship with Ottawa and Alberta's divergent political views that have arisen 2) Alberta's economic strength
Anyways, I hope I can develop something over time.  This is a fairly large topic area really. (Unsigned Trvthseeker (talk) - 21:06, 20 March 2006)
===Other subtopics===
Other subtopics that should be covered:
*Aboriginal wars (territorial dominance of different tribes (Cree, Blackfoot, Dene/Chipewyan) before colonisation, relation with fur traders)
*Exporers (such as Alexander MacKenzie, Peter Pond, David Thompson) and their travels through Alberta (Canadian Rockies passes, travel along rivers, Hudson Bay Company trading posts)
*North West Mounted Police/RCMP history in the province, including whisky trade, forts built.
*first european communities established (Fort Vermilion, Fort Chipewyan), first colonies in what turned into major cities. 
*Railway period (northern route promises and the settlement of the Edmonton area, southern route reality and the growth of railway prairie towns, subsequent compensation of Edmonton).
Please add more. --Qyd 14:23, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Expanding the article

message: Other subtopics that should be covered:
*Aboriginal wars (territorial dominance of different tribes (Cree, Blackfoot, Dene/Chipewyan) before colonisation, relation with fur traders)
*Exporers (such as Alexander MacKenzie, Peter Pond, David Thompson) and their travels through Alberta (Canadian Rockies passes, travel along rivers, Hudson Bay Company trading posts)
*North West Mounted Police/RCMP history in the province, including whisky trade, forts built.
*first european communities established (Fort Vermilion, Fort Chipewyan), first colonies in what turned into major cities. 
*Railway period (northern route promises and the settlement of the Edmonton area, southern route reality and the growth of railway prairie towns, subsequent compensation of Edmonton).
Please add more. --Qyd 14:23, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Other subtopics

message: Seems as if this article uses an old stub version. Should be updated by someone who finds the appropriate ones. --Nyp 15:14, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub update

message: I've been working on a new template for the Histories of the Provinces.  See here:
Do you think we need it?  And is this the right format for it?  Thanks. Kevlar67 02:38, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Template 

message: Many errors in the later history segment, in respect to petroleum history. Please refer to Wiki petroleum history articles for at least some useful information. I have added links to them within a topic sentence. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Pmbcomm (talk • contribs) 01:11, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Petroleum history 

message: This was posted on the [[Prairie Provinces] page just now, mostly Alberta historical resources but other material covering other provinces also.Skookum1 (talk) 18:23, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Useful resource

message: Section 4.3.1 and possibly others are not neutral point of view. — Muckapedia (talk) 24e avr. 2010 12h09 (−4h)
::problem solved by stressing the views of Prokop, a RS. Rjensen (talk) 18:29, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: A serious guide to the history of Alberta needs a bibliography--this one is based on the 24-page annotated bibliography in Palmer, Alberta: A New History" and the Encyclopedia of Alberta (2007). Calling it all "crap" shows a disdain for serious RS upon which Wikipedia must be based. Rjensen (talk) 16:52, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually is was  move to its own page. We have no need to list ever book on the History of Alberta on this page (we are not a book store). It has been moved to its own page as per the norm when we have a Bibliography that is bigger then the actual article.Moxy (talk) 17:02, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: We have a need for a short selected bibliography so users know what research is available to study.  Policy has to be discussed not imposed by brute force. Moxy seems to think that it tried to "list ever book" which is totally false and a serious misunderstanding of what RS are all about. (it a small selection from the Palmer book) The problem is perhaps his suggestion that guides to the best books are all "crap" and books only belong in  a "book store". Rjensen (talk) 17:18, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure what your problem is ..is on its own page nothing deleted. As per the norm see Bibliography of Canadian history and Bibliography of British Columbia. It is crap to simply list books without even  tiring to help articles. Best also to list all the info needed to find this books like publishers and ISBN numbers. Again not sure you saw that is was all moved, best to look before speaking. I have listed a few books that can actually be read by our readers and not simply a shopping list. I will be doing this for all the provinces over time Moxy (talk) 17:25, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography 

message: This article tries to spin a narrative rather than presenting its facts in a clear impartial manner. Hamish Paul Wilson (talk) 16:21, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: All the facts are presented in a clear, impartial manner, and all are fully sourced to RS. No one has identified a single case of "spin."  Does it sound too interesting to be an encyclopedia article? Rjensen (talk) 18:06, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tone