lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Auguste Piccard

message: They are giving undue weight to quotes to make Piccard look as a flat earther, when his life and writtings consistently show otherwise. This is already going for months.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jairo amaral (talk • contribs) 19:10, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Entry is being biased by flat earthers

message: Where was the 1953 dive (3170m, IIRC) made?  TREKphiler hit me ♠  07:21, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: In over my head?

message: "Piccard's exploits are celebrated in media, the most famous example of which is the Star Trek character Jean-Luc Picard, who was named after Piccard and his brother Jean." This is not lede material.c --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 04:34, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed from lede

message: Is the Jeanluc Piccard name/link in the family a joke?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.147.221.192 (talk) 02:29, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jeanluc? 

message: The two observers described the Earth as a flat disk with upturned edge. Originator7 (talk) 21:28, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. DannyS712 (talk) 22:04, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 24 February 2019 

message: Current opening paragraph says Piccard used helium to fill his balloon. I think that hydrogen is more likely because USA helium embargo to keep Zepplelin war ships stuck using hydrogen. I do not know any facts about this so I am asking for leads and background about Piccard's balloon lifting gas. Anybody got a quote from a newspaper or a book regarding lifting gas in ballooning in 1930's?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Electricmic (talk • contribs) 22:52, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you're right that this is an error. None of the sources mention helium, but multiple NYT articles mention his hydrogen balloons. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 03:46, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Used Helium or Hydrogen?
Talk:Clarkson Cup

message: It seems that the article gives the trophy the same calibre as the stanley cup when in fact the trophy has not been awarded for two years and is in no way about to be awarded again. It seems this trophy is defunct., and did not acheive its intended purpose. There is too much merit in this article given to the trophy. 
Personally I think the article should be renamed into a broader theme of womans hockey chamionships and a new articel called the clarkson cup changed as a stub., that is until it is no longer a defunct trophy and actually awarded. Perhaps the article can be cleaned up a touch what are the thoughts out there? Jgale061 (talk) 21:59, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article's biasy
Talk:Natalie Schafer

message: WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 22:15, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: It's known that Schafer never liked to give her age. But most sources read Red Bank, New Jersey. You found the proof reading New York City, debunking this large fact?
Her death certificate does actually read New Jersey, I'll list this before someone comes foreword with exact proof.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.224.48.255 (talk) 22:56, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Place of Birth

message: I am quite positive that the lovely actress said on TV or at least in print that she was surprised when people would approach her and ask where her TV husband was.  She thought this was really stupid and said she goes home at night to real husband.  She was not very nice about it all.  My point being, that she said she had a husband and it wasn't good old Thurston.  --24.177.0.116 (talk) 19:35, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: If you can source it, it might be an interesting tidbit to add. Especially given the actors on Gilligan's Island were so typecast by that show (ex: Tina Louise always claimed it ruined her career)...Engr105th (talk) 17:52, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I just added that her obituary stated she was survived by longtime companion Maurice Hill. I referenced my source. Karenthewriter (talk) 04:00, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Husband Number 2? 

message: Just curious why are none of the Gilligan roles included in the filmography? Gjxj (talk) 16:49, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanx.  - FlightTime (open channel) 17:04, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  filmography
Talk:Michel Rollier

message: Born in 1944 and "one of the foremost pioneers of the automobile industry". This statement looks weird and biased to me. --Edcolins 08:05, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 
Talk:John Santerineross

message: It appears at first glance that this fellow is notable but the article is not encylopedic in tone, expresses a point of view, and it has the feel of a vanity article. --William Pietri 08:06, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup needed 

message: I have stubbified this page, as the cleanup tag wasn't getting us anywhere. I've added some references in case somebody would like to extend the article. William Pietri 09:08, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stubbified 

message: I put in a bunch of information last week- I don't know what the tone of the article was before, but hopefully it sounds mostly neutral and encylopedic now. I removed the "stub" status.
Afries 17:51, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Welcome to Wikipedia, the encyclopedia anyone can edit.  Free fell to improve the article is whatever way(s) you feel is appropriate. --ThaddeusB (talk) 04:05, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elaboration
Talk:Chase (Chase album)

message: I played with him briefly in a band Desert Sky based in Indianapolis. Evets ztruk (talk) 20:57, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jerry Van Blair
Template talk:Disney theatrical animated features

message: They just announced that production is halted so it should be removed from the template.104.245.210.36 (talk) 22:24, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gigantic cancelled 

message: 108.7.210.83 (talk) 15:17, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Question: Why? MadGuy7023 (talk) 21:51, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 14:36, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 22 February 2020 

message: Remove the entry for the Disney Pixar film "Luca". There is no article for a Disney film by that name. 45.251.33.149 (talk) 05:29, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: While not a red link at this point, the diambiguation page for Luca shows the film red-linked. WP:REDNOT also indicates that in limited amounts it is possible to red link in navboxes. Regards,  Goldsztajn (talk) 00:10, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 4 October 2020 

message: Who deleted The Brave Little Toaster from the template? It was produced and released theatrically by Disney. It belongs in the "Other Disney units" section.
Spiritoftheeast1993 (talk) 04:58, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: The Brave Little Toaster

message: 2A02:214A:801C:8100:8416:3BBC:A061:D64F (talk) 15:16, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: This change is done.  RudolfRed (talk) 19:08, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 25 October 2023
Talk:Chehalis, British Columbia

message: NB this article should be about the community/ethnography, and there should be a separate article on the Chehalis dialect of Halkomeylem, as well as a separate Chehalis First Nation article on the government as such.Skookum1 08:08, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The links in here are broken, but the Province of British Columbia listings for Aboriginal and First Nations communities has the same broken links and maybe they will fix them.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ProliferatingJade (talk • contribs) 04:25, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Broken Links
Talk:Arkansas (song)

message: Looks like I may have to register for Wikipedia in order to fix this one.  The posted lyrics are to "Arkansas (You Run Deep In Me)" by Wayland Holyfield, one of the two "state songs" as designated in 1987; but the title (and Arkansas article) show it as "Arkansas" by Eva Ware Barnett, the "state song" before 1987 but now the "state anthem".  This article on the Holyfield song needs to be moved to "Arkansas (You Run Deep In Me)" (previously set up as a protolink without the parentheses in the Holyfield article) and replaced with an article on the Barnett song, and the links in the main Arkansas article conformed to it.
I ended up registering for Wikipedia over this dispute all right, but it took some time; my first article was on "Arkansas (You Run Deep In Me)", written to go along with my rewrites on the other Arkansas state songs.  --RBBrittain 23:23, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine/Gastroenterology task force

message: I've archived some inactive threads to subsections which were notifications about discussions that have since been closed. — Cirt (talk) 13:14, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archived some threads 

message: This is a notice about :Category:Gastroenterology articles needing expert attention, which might be of interest to your WikiProject. It will take a while before the category is populated. Iceblock (talk) 19:43, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expert attention 

message: http://jn.nutrition.org/content/129/7/1412S.full and others are Free for Abstracts, Texts, and PDFs. References should be amended to include |url= . ~~ Xb2u7Zjzc32 (talk) 23:15, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: The American Society for Nutritional Sciences

message: Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for information on WP1.0 web tool 

message: :Category:Gastroenterology articles needing expert attention has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Peaceray (talk) 18:12, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: [[:Category:Gastroenterology articles needing expert attention]] has been nominated for discussion

message: I have justed added reciprocal "See also" sections to Gastroenteritis and Enterocolitis. It would be very useful, IMO, to have a short section in each article discussing the relationship and distinction/differentiation between the two diseases, which certainly appear to be quite similar, especially in terms of how they present. (My sense of things is that Enterocolitis might possibly even be regarded as a subset/"special case" of Gastroenteritis.) Anomalous+0 (talk) 23:08, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: PS - Please  me if you reply. Thanks! Anomalous+0 (talk) 23:22, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gastroenteritis vs Enterocolitis?
Talk:Frank Kitson

message: I’ve detagged the article (cleanup/wikify) with a short rewrite. I've included one sensible ref for pre-Kitson "pseudo gangs" because some of the Internet sources about Kitson are so confused and inaccurate. For example Truth Seeker, requoted many times elsewhere says wrongly:
::"It was a British officer, General Frank Kitson, who first thought up the concept that was later used in the formation of Al Qaeda. He called it the ‘pseudo gang’ – a state sponsored group used to advance an agenda, while discrediting the real opposition. The strategy was used in both Kenya and Northern Ireland. In the case of Northern Ireland, most of the violence that was attributed to ‘Loyalists’ was in actuality not their handiwork, but the result of the activities of the death squads affiliated to the British secret state."
But more could probably be said about the influence of what Kitson really wrote on low intensity operations.--Mereda 08:16, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Geoff Bullock

message: People who post on Wikipedia should at least try and make contact with the people involved when they make comments about their personal life . Geoff Bullock has been pretty candid on the reasons he left Hillsong and it had nothing to do with moral failure on anybody's part . I refer doubters to the 2004 article which has been linked to this article. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Smithus (talk • contribs) 09:21, 31 May 2006  (UTC)
: Thanks for the fact checking. (It's not really necessary to contact a subject of a biographical article in order to do a decent job; best practice is to rely on reliable, published sources.) — Matt Crypto 00:11, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fact check 

message: Should we not add in a discography section?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jair Crawford (talk • contribs) 17:18, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, and have started such a section with Jair Crawford's help.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 04:07, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  Cool. That was my comment up there from a while back, before I signed in. lol I'd still like to help with the discography. I left a message on your talk page. I've been busier lately but I want to help when I can. Jair Crawford (talk) 05:40, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Not a problem, continue the table with the style already provided. I'm working elsewhere for awhile.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 09:31, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discography 
Talk:Muscle shirt

message: The article is on "muscle shirts": well, where is the muscle? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 142.167.88.21 (talk) 08:06, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misleading photo 

message: "A muscle shirt is a type of t-shirt or undershirt worn mostly by men (hence the reason why they're called muscle shirts)."
I disagree with this reason. Surely the reason they are called muscle shirts is because the physique is exposed. In fact, a later sentence also gives this reason:
"They are meant to be worn as fitted tops, in that their accepted purpose is to showcase physique."
138.243.129.4 20:05, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misleading reason
Wikipedia talk:Jimbo on Userboxes

message: Templates are not really needed.
--Kamil Hasenfeller (talk) 11:54, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: I strongly agree

message: It seems to me that Jimbo is OK with userbox templates, even POV ones, in user-space, just not in Template: space or elsewhere.
I believe this is what the German Wikipedia does. —Ashley Y 08:28, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The German Solution seems to be a classic example of something being suppressed and going underground! Rentwa 01:25, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Right.  It's only going to make the use of "unacceptable" userboxes proliferate.   You either have to allow them, unrestricted, or you have to make it impossible to use them.  There's no middle ground here.  The thing I see developing at Wikipedia: The German solution is an idea that there are some which are good (Babel boxes, professional identification boxes and the like) and some which are bad (religious and political identifiers).  Thing is, every single thing about you as a person goes into your world view and ultimately into your writing.  The idea of a neutral Wikipedian is a myth.  I would therefore argue that we should just leave things as they were.  Honestly, I bet if you compared the list of people banned from Wikipedia (truly Jimbo's "wrong sort of people") against their use of userboxes, you'd probably find little to no correlation between the two phenomena.   At least people who use userboxes are making it clear where they stand so that you can read their edits with a view toward understanding how their work might be biased. —CzechOut 23:35, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Exegesis 

message: If NPOV has become so dogmatic as to ban expression of moderate political views and non-fundamentalist religious belief then it would appear to have crossed the line and become a POV itself.
If some userboxes are contentious, are Wikipedians to be regarded as not intelligent or mature enough to express their views, and co-exist with others who express different ones? Rentwa 13:41, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extremism? 

message: jimbo said, "...they give visitors the wrong idea of what it means to be a Wikipedian." Complete opposite, they give people an idea of who is behind the name/page. More Wikipedians should use user boxes and not live in a secret world. Culnacreann 14:59, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have moved this user's opinion here. fetofs Hello! 21:12, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong Point 

message: Everyone is free to express his or opinion freely, as long as its not vandalism, direct attacks or editing user-pages other than your own. I think the userboxes should be kept but users who use them wrongly or if they are too uncivilized to be kept in the civilized world (supporting the Nazis or revering Hitler for a matter), those users should be blocked. Thank you. (Ahnaf 11:44, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please keep the userboxes 

message: : —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Avriette (talk • contribs) 05:38, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  probably strike last section
Talk:Linux on embedded systems

message: i hear a lot of people here in brazil which call that low level programming language "assembler". wouldn't it be "assembly"? for me assembler is the part of a compiler which does the dirty work... if so, in the first paragraph, "using proprietary software coded in assembler." would be "using proprietary software coded in assembly" which i think is the right name for the programming language. sorry for the informal language, i'm just proposing a minor change, i'd do myself, but i thought i'd better ask people before. 201.21.255.222 05:35, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: assembly is called assembler and assembly interchangeably.173.36.196.8 (talk) 20:27, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled discussion

message: This article focuses too much on giving readers links to product and project websites.  If there is a Wikipedia article about a topic, this article should link to that article, not the project's external website.  We're not hear to direct readers to the right website, we are writing an encyclopedia. Gronky 15:29, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fewer external links, this is not a web portal

message: I added some clarification of what embedded Linux entails and a statement about the ELC. 
I also removed Red Hat from the list because they don't really support embedded Linux these days. I added yet another link because folks reading the article probably are interested in finding out more. The link is to LinuxDevices.com which is really the leading web site for embedded Linux information.
Oysterpoboy 17:54, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Added discussion, removed Red Hat

message: Recent article on Embedded.com, indicates that Wind River and MontaVista are currently running full-page ads implying that Embedded Linux is unreliable and expensive to keep up. Given the author is a Green Hills representative, I'm hesitant to ascribe much to the article, but I thought I would pass it on to see if people more familiar with the subject felt there was any merit to it. -Fuzzy (talk) 17:19, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticisms by Wind River and MontaVista 

message: This article is very outdated, even this part of the article on linux reflects better the situation.
We could:
* try to find updated figures
* talk more about the differences between standard embedded GNU/Linux and android
* add build systems
* add a history section
GNUtoo(my point of views(for npov)) | talk 22:56, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  outdated 

message: The first (and only) reference link is dead. --Stijn Brouwer (talk) 17:16, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference link is dead 

message: Well, mobile devices are also a kind of embedded Linux variants, if everyone agrees.  Embedded is pretty much everything that isn't general-purpose.  Also, the heading section requires a complete rewrite, as it currently isn't in an encyclopedic form. -- Dsimic (talk) 13:51, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notes about the article redo
Talk:Shaznay Lewis

message: I have just changed the birth name to Tricia Marie Lewis, citing the birth records held by the General Register Office of the government of England and Wales. The reference includes a URL which takes you to a scanned image of Shaznay's birth record, hosted by ancestry.co.uk. This is a subscription service, but you can check it for free if you take advantage of their 14-day free trial (as I have done). Labalius (talk) 21:41, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Birth Name

message: shaznaylewis.co.uk is a skincare, cosmetics and fashion site. Reading its contents, I doubt that its Shaznay Lewis's homepage. Laetoli (talk) 12:08, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Homepage 
Category talk:Pneumatic weapons

message: These two categories seem almost identical, yet there are plenty of items in one that aren't in the other.  Is there any plan to deconflict the two categories?  Either eliminate the term "Pneumatic Weapons" entirely and just use the category "Airguns" or some other?  Failing a plan, would anyone have a huge complaint if I just merged the two categories, and re-filed whatever few exceptions are clearly not "airguns"? MatthewVanitas (talk) 02:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Pneumatic Weapons vs. Airguns
Talk:List of Finnair destinations

message: Should we add routes that are not served from/to the HEL hub? Like Bangkok-Singapore or Amsterdam-Kuusamo during the winter months. FlyerBoy
:Can someone book & fly only those sectors? And is it Finnair planes? If yess to both, then I cannot see why not/wangi 13:51, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Non-hub flights

message: Finair fly to Tel Aviv every sunday  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.181.225.160 (talk) 10:20, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  map needs to be updated 

message: Can Ireland be added to the destinations map? Dublin will be restarted from March 2015.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aerguy (talk • contribs) 09:38, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  map update 
Talk:Loa loa filariasis

message: In the 'transmission section,' mango links to the fruit. I also don't understand the significance of mangrove. Icybears (talk) 22:48, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Mango or mango fly?