lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Mega Man ZX (series)

message: I think this page is useless. The ZX series link should link to the first game of Megaman ZX , which like star force but has one less game.Dragonsblast (talk) 00:44, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Useless page
Talk:List of naval ship classes in service

message: Hi, I don't see the Danish Absalon-class frigate in the list. Any reason for that? Chrras (talk) 13:29, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I've now added them for you. - wolf 01:11, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Absalon-class 

message: Current information is : 
Kirov-class battlecruiser
[...]
Ships in class:  5
[...]
Status:  1 in service, 2 awating disposal, 1 in long-term refit
That makes 4 in status, and 5 ships in class which leaves one missing. I suppose it could be the recently sunk Moskva but I don't know enough to modify the information myself Alexisbu (talk) 23:24, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: -  Moskva was a , not a . As for the Kirov entry, the cancelled ship was missing from the tally, but it's there now. - wolf 05:09, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of Kirov class cruiser 

message: Should this be split into e.g. List of cruiser classes in service, List of destroyer classes in service, List of frigate classes in service, List of corvette classes in service? – Kaihsu (talk) 08:54, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Splitting?
Talk:Hi-5 (American TV series)

message: Which (three) years was it nominated for an Emmy? Doe this need a citation? RJFJR (talk) 17:09, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: 2005,2006,2007 -  -  -  --Joseph123454321 (talk) 00:40, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Emmy
Talk:1999 Athens earthquake

message: When researching for my new article Spyros B. Pavlides I noticed that he numerously reported about the 1999 Athens earthquake, but wikipedia did not know about this disaster. I guess there is more Turkish editors here than Greek ones.  Laudak 04:55, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article life

message: The introduction to the article and the infobox state a 6.0Mw magnitude but, in the Damage section of the article, the magnitude is reported as a 6.7Mw. So... which is it? --12.43.115.249 (talk) 13:33, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The magnitude was 6.0, the 6.7 is referring to an earthquake in 1981. I edited it to make it more clear. RapidR (talk) 15:03, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistent magnitude 
Talk:Home (Westlife song)

message: Although I'm not a Westlife fan - but my mother is :P - isn't this not the first time the band have had a song called "Home"? I recall a song on their fifth album also entitled "Home". I don't know whether this is relevant information, but just a suggestion.~~NaN 20:59, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The title
Talk:Nakkhul

message: hai nakul ur rokking in kadhalil vizhundhen film it i o-sum.such a wonderfull acting u have a bright future all the best and choose ur best film in future and rock man  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.92.117.22 (talk) 16:47, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  hai nakul 

message: u r really rocking in kadalil vizundhan . iwish to be the red heart balloon and the cup u won sothat i wud get a kiss 4m u . im going mad of u  ur really roking as saba and was more roking as juju luv u
........................................................................................................................with lots lots lots of luv  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.164.143.166 (talk) 10:56, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  hai mulamandri 

message: HAI NAKUL THIS IS RAGHAVI HERE . I LUV YOUUUUUU  . IHAVE SEEN YOU.  I THINK YOU REMEMBER ME . I NOW ALL ABOUT YOU VERY WELL YOU WEREVERY GOOD  IMISSYOU.--59.96.15.64 (talk) 10:06, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  hai nakul  

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 01:39, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Nakul (actor) →  – Last three films credited him as this name (here, here and here). Google search of this name brings lots of results. DareshMohan (talk) 01:01, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 9 July 2022
Talk:Naked Ambition (King of the Hill episode)

message: I'm fairly sure that this does meet notability guidelines. It's an episode of a very popular sitcom, so finding citations to synopsis (synopsises?) shouldn't be difficult.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.25.32.125 (talk) 21:28, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Grand Slam (band)

message: Doish Nagle played in a group called the Japs before Grand Slam and also The Bogey Boys see []
Opiumjones 23 (talk) 16:08, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Doish Nagle
Talk:190 (number)

message: This is one of the most dumbest wiki pages that exist.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.107.80.245 (talk) 05:09, 2007 September 28 (UTC)
Most dumbest? Before criticising, TAKE GRAMMAR LESSONS!
☻I am only here because the Vulcans want to know when they should come☻ (talk) 14:56, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The Vulcans wouldn't need this page because they'd already know this information and would probably meditate on far larger numbers than us mere humans could hope to deal with. PrimeFan (talk) 21:52, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Debate on whether this page is the most dumbest Wikipedia page or not 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :198 (number) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 29#198 (number) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:43, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "198 (number)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:.577 Tyrannosaur

message: This is a stub and too small to do any more wikification.  I did remove the section on reloading as it was just a sentence referencing a website.  I moved the link to the References section. DLPanther 01:17, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikification Notes 

message: Why is the recoil of this cartridge measured in units of weight?  Also, you accidentially metric units.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:470:D051:0:2111:466F:BF6F:FCC4 (talk) 22:23, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  force versus weight?
Talk:Materna coat of arms

message: About the proposed DELETION of this article in w:pl:
This is a copy of the answer to w:pl:Wikipedysta:Gaj777. I hope the template should be retired.
:w:pl:Materna (herb szlachecki) 
Dear Kamil,
I am sorry to write you in English but my Polish is a shame. Your concerns seem to be right... Nevertheless if you please take a second look over the following sources I am sure that you will change your mind. As I am not a good painter, I hope that somebody else may do and upload the drawing properly.
* Materna, h. Ślepowron (odmiana) in Ornatowski.com > Indeks nazwisk > Herbarz rodowy, A. Znamierowski
* A drawing of this coat of arms (Herb Materna – inna nazwa Ślepowron odmiana Materna) is avalaible in Genealogia Dynastyczna (Search/szukaj Herb Materna).
Best regards my friend. (By the way, Happy New Year)
--Gustavo (talk) 16:56, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  About the proposed''' DELETION '''of this article in w:pl
Talk:Kuznetsov NK-32

message: In reading the page, this engine is the most powerful installed on a combat aircraft, I thought it should only be fitting to compare it to the most powerful jet install on a commercial aircraft. Please let me know if you wanted sourced.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jacob805 (talk • contribs) 16:21, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  changed engine comparison    

message: Was this engine ever used in a fighter aircraft? 99.236.221.124 (talk) 20:43, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fighter 
Talk:Paul Schiemann

message: Hi all!  This page is a work in progress about a very important figure in the Baltic countries pre world war 2.  It is also the first article I have started and want to complete.  I am planning on adding and expanding it over time.  Disco 06:06, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is also obvious that the German version of wikipedia has a much longer article on him than I do.  If anyone wanted to help translate I would appreciate it! Disco 06:26, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I find babelfish.altavista.com usually does a decent enough job to be useful. —  Pēters J. Vecrumba 03:28, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks for that, I ran it through as well as Google translater.  There is nothing new there I didn't know, other than the name of the university he attended. Disco 12:11, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: You might just consider leaving a note here you are doing major research to improve the article. The "under construction" tag tends to get deleted if no updated happen. Any suggestions would go to you for incorporation while you're working on your reorg/expansion.PētersV 18:10, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Point taken.  Really, there is not much difference between this article any other one that grows over time, so I removed that under construction page.  I plan to add to it over time... but any users stopping by can see that in here.  I would welcome anyone to edit the front page.  Disco 07:34, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Under construction
Talk:Curt Boettcher

message: This article is interesting and well written, but has many unverified claims and almost no references.  Much of the content may be the authors' original research or opinions.  There are many occurrences of weasel words.  The quality and credibility of the article could be significantly improved by removal of unverifiable claims and citations of facts by someone familiar with sources of information on Curt Boettcher. -hulmem (talk) 06:53, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unverified Claims 
Talk:Fitts for Fight

message: I see nothing to support claims of theft in the article. Note that copyright infringement, while illegal, is not theft.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.234.43.68 (talk) 10:03, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Theft claims 

message: The article makes no mention of it, but I wonder, considering the mentioning of vulgar lyrics, if fitts might be a reference to the vulgar Norwegian term fitter, meaning cunts? __meco (talk) 19:59, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meaning of name 
Talk:Parietal callus

message: From the description the image seems like a poor example / might be something else? Here are some images that seem more orthodox:
thumb
thumb
If this is the case, the text should describe that sometimes the callus can be patterned like the rest of the shell instead of "overwriting" the last whorl. Craig Pemberton (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 05:46, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo
Talk:Into the Night (Santana song)

message: hey everybody!
there must be two different kind of musicvideos from santana feat. chad kroeger - into the night. i have seen a version from "rage" and one from our austrian music tv channel called "goTV" in the goTV version there was a scene where someone took with a Sony SLR a picture of the girl and later you could see the image on the screen of the camera. this scene is missing in the version from the music tv channel called "rage"
Different countries have different videos for songs. For example. Linkin Park, What I've Done has two different videos. One which features in probabaly most countries, whereas another features in Australia. Maybe music videos are different in Australia? Oh and next time you edit a page please sign it.
Joepeake 12:21, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2 different kinds of musicvideos 

message: Are u guys serious? how? icelandic hurricane #12(talk) 02:56, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Country rock?
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Succession Box Standardization/Archive 3

message: :VOTING CLOSED: Proposal Approved: The initial proposal to replace all cases of upr and lwr to sen and hs within United States legislative headers passed and was implemented.  The discussion for this proposal has been moved here for archive purposes.  Thank you to everyone who voted.–Whaleyland ( Talk • Contributions ) 23:04, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposal: [[Template:s-par]] change ''upr'' and ''lwr'' to ''sen'' and ''hs'' for United States headers

message: :VOTING CLOSED: Proposal NOT Approved: I have closed voting on this proposal and labeled it as a failed proposal.  While it seems some members wanted the more consistent look of this template change proposal, it seems others have noted that the change may damage other templates that WP:SBS does not monitor.  On those grounds, I have closed this debate.  The discussion has been archived at Wikipedia:WikiProject Succession Box Standardization/Failed proposals where it will remain indefinitely.  Thank you to everyone who voted and keep at it!–Whaleyland ( Talk • Contributions ) 21:54, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposal: ''Wider succession boxes''
Talk:Lam Research

message: I believe the IP editor that changed million to billion in the infobox is incorrect. Source says 5,259,312 (thousands) which should be 5,259.312 million, not billion. I'll check back in a few days to change it back if I see no other objections. Mysticdan (talk) 14:37, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revenue
Talk:Freddy Fjellheim

message: A first time editor started this article and I've wikified it a bit. I have no familiarity with this author and no Norwegian language abilities. Hopefully someone with one or both can have a run at improving this as he seems a fairly notable literary figure in Norway at least.--Bigtimepeace | talk |  contribs 08:08, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional work needed
Talk:Creation geophysics/Hydroplates archive

message: I removed the 'geo-stub' and replaced with a 'christianity-stub', as I think Dr Walt Brown would be considered to be holding a minority position in the science of geophysics. --Randolph 04:46, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not a big fan of multiple stubs. So I'll leave it to you guys to work out.  My interest was making sure the article was clearly labelled under the category of Young Earth Creationist to clearly delineate it from conventional geophysics.  I think the YEC categorisation is sufficient. Rebuttals of YEC'ists are not my forte.  I'll leave that to others. --Randolph 05:23, 3 May 2005 (UTC)

message: all references are to pro-creationism sites, there is no mention that this "theory" is highly disputed and not taken seriously, etc. This article wsa added as a series of highly biased POV-pushing by an anon user. The little bit of cleanup that has happened since then is good, but nowhere near sufficientDreamGuy 05:06, May 3, 2005 (UTC)
*Dream, you got a point. I don't know Walt and not ready to make some researches around the net. But since Randolph says that he is more into religious science, than your template seems appropriate. Cheers Svest 05:10, May 3, 2005 (UTC)  Wiki me up
DO NOT remove the NPOV tag until the problems with the article are fixed.  DreamGuy 05:12, May 3, 2005 (UTC)
: Heh..sorry about that.  Somehow I managed to edit over your addition of the NPOV tag, while I was fixing the links. --Randolph 05:15, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Ive also removed the extra sub-heading placed under external links.  It's simply not necessary to have that heading there.  I get the feeling that editors think they are 'protecting' people from these pseudoscientific opinions, but I personally feel they are underestimating the intelligence of the reader.  People come to this article with their own pre-conceptions already in place.  It's not necessary for us to molly coddle the reader to see things from our veiwpoint.  State the facts of the article and leave it at that.  I really hope some of those editors with particularly aggressive stances against creationism will step back and stop holding the hand of the reader and let people think for themselves. --Randolph 18:23, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV tag

message: I've added a link to crtics of the hydroplate theory and flood geology.  I've also removed links that were pro hydroplate theory, but all on the same website.  One reference to each website should be sufficient for people to find the source of the information. I feel that this is sufficient to give a balanced point of view and hope that we can agree to remove the NPOV tag. --Randolph 18:53, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Link to critics and supporters
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Birds/Peer review

message: I note that the peer review request dated 12th February 2007 has been archived without comment. I understand that we are busy and the subject may be of slender interest to most. Nonetheless it would be helpful if someone could take a moment to answer the following mini-questionnaire by placing 'Y' or 'N' next to one or more of the statements. This is not a singular experience and I'd like to avoid wasting everyone's time in future by either not pestering Projects, or by making the request more enticing. 
I/we did not comments on this article as it was:
:Not relevant to WikiProject Birds.
:Too specialised a subject and outside of my/our expertise.
:So brilliant I/we could not think of anything to say.
:So awful I/we did not want to take the time to try to make sense of it.
:Too long and I/we are too busy.
:I/we made some edits to the article and forgot/did not think it was necessary to comment here.
:I/we are Simpson's fans and did not want to have to deal with a potentially  grumpy Groundskeeper Willie type.
:Other (pls specify).
Yours in anticipation. Ben MacDui (Talk) 08:01, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Fauna of Scotland]]

message: Hi Ben:  I've never peer reviewed an article before (I have an eye on this page because I'm waiting for a few of my own to be looked at) but I'll try to have a look at yours in the next few days.  I'm currently on a working trip to Australia and don't have loads of time to work on-line (and won't be in a place with internet capabilities for much longer) but I'll do what I can! MeegsC | Talk 11:32, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Will do
Talk:Creation geophysics/Rapid-decay theory archive

message: Do we have any secondary sources that have discussed this at all? JoshuaZ 02:02, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, there are plenty in the article. BlueValour 02:51, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  All the sources are primary sources making arguments one way or another. JoshuaZ 03:44, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Secondary sources?
Talk:St. Michael's Cathedral (Sitka, Alaska)

message: Bias disclosure: I'm not really that big a fan of DYK.  Having said that, the fact used here isn't all that interesting.  Something far more interesting would have been along the lines of how the plans that the NPS drew up in 1962 allowed the cathedral to be reconstructed following the 1966 fire.
I could smell a DYK coming simply by observing the rapid expansion of the article.  Nonetheless, nothing about it on this talk page until it was already over and done with, even though collaboration may have been helpful in this case.  Makes me even more convinced that DYK is more an ego-stroking exercise than an indispensable part of the encyclopedia. RadioKAOS  –  Talk to me, Billy  14:03, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: DYK
Talk:BLC 15-pounder gun

message: * 15pdr BLC anti-aircraft gun in Cape Town
* "Skinny Liz"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by NJR ZA (talk • contribs) 05:58, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional non-encyclopaedic (forums etc) info

message: The Ordnance BLC 15 pdr guns were used in Russia during the Civil war in 1919.
http://pix009.livejournal.com/12937.html
СуперЛун (talk) 19:55, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Combat service
Talk:QF 2.95-inch mountain gun

message: The Palmerston Fort Society links are broken, but the content has been transferred to the Victorian Forts site. Links here need to be changed accordingly. See here Vicarage (talk) 20:37, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Broken links

message: A question for someone more knowledgeable on artillery: why does Gorges (1930), writing about these guns with the WAFF in 1914, call them 2.95 MM Hotchkiss QF mountain guns?  Were they a Hotchkiss design built under license by Vickers?  The page should answer this obvious question.  --Wally Tharg (talk) 10:54, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Question: Vickers or Hotchkiss?

message: According to the text, this gun was not used by the British Army. According to the photograph of the example in the US Ordnance Museum, it was, in the Dardanelles (Gallipoli). Incidentally, the appalling grammar of the inscription on the plaque indicates that the curator was donated to the Museum. We can't do anything about the plaque, but can the use of the gun be clarified? Hengistmate (talk) 21:31, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Contradictory Statements

message: In Russian Wikipedia I've found a photo of the gun in Russia during the Civil War in winter 1918 near the Kungur town, Perm region. We can see two pieces of the Chehoslovak Legion in action against Reds. The photo is from the Cheh military archives in Prague. By the way there is one piece of the gun in Cheh military museum, wich is under reconstruction now. The question is how and where the Chehoslovaks got these guns.
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/
СуперЛун (talk) 16:48, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  QF 2.95-incn mountain gun in Russia, 1918.
Talk:QF 4.7-inch Mk I – IV naval gun

message: The Palmerston Fort Society links are broken, but the content has been transferred to the Victorian Forts site. Links here need to be changed accordingly. See here Vicarage (talk) 20:38, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

message: Is "QF 4.7-inch Gun" considered by some sources to be a proper name?  Most books seem to lower case gun, and I noticed a number of other gun articles were recently fixed to lowercase.  And if it's the name, why is the article at "QF 4.7-inch Mk I – IV naval gun"?  Dicklyon (talk) 14:04, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's it called?
Talk:BL 8-inch howitzer Mk I – V

message: According to the draft history in Kew's MUN5/373/9227
Originally a conversion from 6" gun, shortened and chamber enlarged.  Mk was wire bound A tube., mks 1 - 5 had differing cradles all elevs -5 to + 45 deg. Hydraulics buffers and springs.  It was easier to make than 9.2 and much like 6" How.  Repair of Mks 1 - 4 was discontinued in summer 1917.
At first production was confined to the Admiralty (comment - probably because 6"gun was basically naval) but in Dec 1914 Armstrongs and Vickers were each asked to convert 4 and Beardmore's 3.  Demand for 8" upset the production plan that each gun would have only 2 manufacturers. In autumn 1915 Woolwich were converting 40.
Production figures:
Mk 1 - 12 (Mar - Jul 15)
Mk 2 - 6 (May)
Mk 3 - 6 May Jun
Mk 4 - 8 Oct
Mk 5 - 4 Dec, + 59 1916
Nfe 04:15, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for contributing that ! I've updated the page, would you like to review it and make any further corrections ? Rcbutcher 07:00, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

message: The gun in the bottom picture marked "howitzer receiving new barrel" is not a Mk 1-5 but a Mk 6-8 (cf.), as can be seen from, e.g., the absence of return pistons above the barrel, the thinner barrel, the two interrupted mantle collars, and the narrower wheels. The short barrel would suggest a Mk 6.--Death Bredon (talk) 19:53, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong model picture?
Talk:Kemal Kerinçsiz

message: En riktig HORUNGE. Hoppas han plågas tills han dör.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.226.186.221 (talk) 20:38, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled