lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Mist, Oregon

message: Populations are often given in Wikipedia articles for unincorporated Census Designated Places (CDP). Is there any population figure for Mist? Or is it not a CDP? 66.234.220.195 (talk) 15:30, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If it were a CDP, it would already have an article, since these were produced by User:Rambot in 2002. Maybe it is part of another CDP in Oregon? Sometimes people are able to cite population figures for individual unincorporated communities, but I'm not sure where they find those. You might ask at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Oregon. Katr67 (talk) 16:45, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Part of the problem is that the hiway divides the census tracking.   this is why you find one side of the highway in a different legislative district than the the other.   Thus there is no community.Rvannatta (talk) 04:36, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population
Talk:Hamida al-Attas

message: its known that Al-Attas family are from Yemeni origin ! Ammar 18:28, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the Osama bin Laden article, "al-Attas" was not her maiden name, but the name of her second husband Muhammad al-Attas.  Al-Attas was an employee of the bin Laden company (presumably in Saudi Arabia?) so there is no conflict with her being Syrian and the al-Attas family being Yemeni. --Saforrest 05:01, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: According to Jonathan Randal's book Osama: The Making of a Terrorist, her second husband's family is related to the former foreign secretary of Indonesia, Ali Alatas.  Is this something verified by others?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.229.146.78 (talk) 09:05, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Syrian ? 

message: Is the Guardian interview one copywrited? Perhaps use a stock one from the BBC or somewhere similar? Naihreloe (talk) 09:18, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A photo? 

message: An interview from 2018 in the Guardian said she was in her mid-70s? Is this correct?
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/aug/03/osama-bin-laden-mother-speaks-out-family-interview
:Peter Bergen's The Rise and fall of Osama bin Laden states in the family tree that she was born in 1943, which would make her 75 in that interview. I'll change the dates mentioned in the article. INDT (talk) 16:13, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth date
Talk:Line–sphere intersection

message: Oops, meant to comment properly on my undo, but hit enter and accidentally did the undo without explanation.  But anyway, the signs were definitely correct before.  The minus in front of the 4 flips the sign of the r^2 when you expand it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.7.100.16 (talk) 20:46, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sign Flip
Talk:Tuen Mun New Town

message: Tuen Mun probably isn't regarded as a New Town any more, as it's been around for more than 30 years - should this article be merged with the "Tuen Mun" article? Alternatively, I propose that all HK place name/district articles be named such that district articles are suffixed with (district). That is, Tuen Mun would become "Tuen Mun", which refers to the town, and "Tuen Mun (district)", which refers to the district... --СђrΐsτσρhΞr ScЋδlτξη 20:35, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: (no title)

message: Ok, now there is Tuen Mun, Tuen Mun New Town and Tuen Mun District for "Tuen Mun". Yes, the three places are not the same , but at the same time they have a degree of overlap. I would suggest "Tuen Mun New Town" as a division of labour as wiki articles, only about the development history of the built-up area as a new (satellite) town, and put the rest of the content to Tuen Mun. Also, there is no such "New Town" level of government. The infobox parameter should for Tuen Mun District only. Matthew hk (talk) 19:58, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need rewrite  

message: Ok the press release of the town's OZP said 2,260 hectares in size. And then Civil Engineering and Development Department said 3,266 hectares. Did it refer to the same boundaries or in CEDD's sense the town project (historically) covers more area? Matthew hk (talk) 00:01, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: And old press release also used the wording: .https://www.news.gov.hk/isd/ebulletin/en/category/infrastructureandlogistics/050121/html/050121en06004.htm Or are there some area are within the OZP but unplanned? Matthew hk (talk) 01:08, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

text: Some offtopic. According to census, the whole district had 487,546 people in 2011 (or by 2018 estimate, 502,700 (rounded up to the nearest hundreds)https://www.censtatd.gov.hk/hkstat/sub/sp150.jsp?productCode=D5320189). The new town despite covers most of the built-up area of the district, seem not possible to have equal number of population. Thus, the same CEDD website claims , cannot be verify or confirming for the time the statement was true. Matthew hk (talk) 07:34, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Area size 

message: I only cited the interpretation by the newspaper Ta Kung Pao , but seem according to the primary sourcehttps://www.census2011.gov.hk/en/district-profiles.html (calling data from the government website directly) the ratio is 22.2% for Tuen Mun District. Feel free to dig out figure (or secondary source that interpret the original data) for "Tuen Mun New Town" exactly or just a secondary source for the whole district. Matthew hk (talk) 00:16, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population work locally
Talk:Arthur II, Duke of Brittany

message: As this is the only source, of those I can find (the others: www.thepeerage.com and www.genealogics.com as well as www3.dcs.hull.ac.uk), which lists two such daughters and says that Robert, Seigneur de Cassel and Robert, Comte de Marle are not the same person, I recommend either finding (and citing) clearifying evidence or combining these daughters into one. --VM (talk) 16:35, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: daughters called Jeanne
Talk:Joan, Duchess of Brittany

message: A portrait would greatly improve this article. Asarelah (talk) 14:41, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Portrait request

message: Joan, Duchess of Brittany is listed in the category Royalty and nobility with disabilities, but there is no reference to a disability on this page. 147.147.20.72 (talk) 01:50, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Royalty & Nobility with disabilities
Template talk:The Crow

message: Just expanded the page for the City of Angels soundtrack and created one for Salvation.  Wanted to add them to the music section of this template, but for some reason it just makes the template go all tall and thin.  Can someone that knows what they're doing have a go?!  Ta very much  Cardinal Wurzel 20:38, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks good.  I've removed the small tags as they are no longer needed.  violet/riga (t) 07:39, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

text: The template stretches automatically to the size needed.  I've placed the third music article in a new row to force it onto the next line, making it look better now. violet/riga (t) 10:40, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

text: I don't know how closely related that is to The Crow.  If it is properly recognised as part of the same thing then yes it could be included.  violet/riga (t) 11:05, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Peter II of Aragon

message: "Sancha of Castile, Queen of Navarre"  at , begins with a cautionary note, "Not to be confused with Sancha of Castile, Queen of Aragon, who was also daughter of Alfonso VII of León and Castile but by his second marriage to Richeza of Poland."  This Sancha of Castile (Queen of Navarre) married Sancho VI of Navarre.
"Sancha of Castile, Queen of Aragon" at , begins with a similar cautionary note, "Not to be confused with Sancha of Castile, Queen of Navarre."  This Sancho of Castile (Queen of Aragon) married Alfonso II of Aragon, and one of their children was Peter II of Aragon.
Sure enough, "Peter II of Aragon" at , states that Peter II was a son of Alfonso II of Aragon and Sancha of Castile, but the hyperlink text "Sancho of Castile" actually links to "Sancha of Castile, Queen of Navarre," the wrong Sancha of Castile.
I have not checked other articles with links to these two "Sancha of Castile" articles for accuracy.
Chickadeebro (talk) 18:04, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad link to Sanch of Castile
Talk:FDA (trade union)

message: What has happened to all the information which was on the page? It was sourced from the FDA website, from the TUC and from the certification officer. Isn't that sufficient? I understanding removing stuff which is just a report that someone is supposed to have said something, but it now looks like virtually the whole page has been removed! Guineveretoo (talk) 15:25, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have reverted and referenced correctly with in-line citations. Jezhotwells (talk) 16:55, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Details and sources 
Talk:Communication Workers Union (United Kingdom)

message: I have to hold myself back from defacing this page to make it clear what the english public think of the CWU and it's members at the moment, moronic children currently holding the British public to ransom over matters they have little control over. The ones they do have control over - i.e. their pay, they can just as well find another job. 
Im sure these views are mirrored countrywide.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.201.27.73 (talk) 19:36, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No. The comment reflects a view that has been expressed in reliable sources, and which should (in a balanced manner) make its way into the article.Mayalld 11:48, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: While I am not affiliated with the union or the workers it represents, or the Royal Mail, I am affected by this industrial action as are most people in this country.  However I would ask people not to include their views when editing this page.  Stick to the known facts (as reported in national media), or the page will end up being locked for persistent vandalism. Parrot of Doom 12:19, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 
Talk:Seven management and planning tools

message: This is a duplicate of Seven management and planning tools.
I'm new to editing on Wikipedia and capatilized the title of this article. It prevents the search 'seven management and planning tools' from working.
I've recommended that this article be deleted. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jdtoellner (talk • contribs) .
:I've fixed this by making "Seven management and planning tools" redirect to Seven Management and Planning Tools. This means that if anyone goes to the Seven management and planning tools article (say by searching for "seven management and planning tools") they will instead end up at Seven Management and Planning Tools. Anyone can create a redirect, in this case I edited the page to contain #REDIRECT Seven Management and Planning Tools. Best, Gwernol 21:58, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplicate 

message: The title is either a widely accepted concept or strategy (article name should be downcased), or it's the title of a website or a book (article name should be italicised). It can't be both, or if it is, it would be more normal to downcase unless someone "owns" them. Can someone say which, please? Tony (talk)  15:24, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: It's neither.  It's actually an echo of what appears in textbooks on the subject of quality control/quality assurance/quality management—see , , , , for example.  (This capitalization is admittedly not universal.)  It's as if the authors regard it as a proper noun ("Not just any seven.  THE Seven!") -- DanielPenfield (talk) 16:36, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Caps and lack of italicisation don't add up
Talk:Fire Brigades Union

message: Needs updating to this https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/708329099597631488/MJvJjMKw.jpg  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.146.216.83 (talk) 23:03, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Logo

message: The list of the FBU's history needs to be integrated into the article proper. Votemoose (talk) 13:27, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:General Federation of Trade Unions (UK)

message: A merger between these tow aritlces makes sense as they are both about the same organisation. The General Federation of Trade Unions article seems to have little that is not in the General Federation of Trade Unions (UK) and so the latter should perhaps be the dominant survivor. - Dave Smith 03:00, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: John Mann is no longer an MP, so the article needs updating. 2A04:4A43:565F:B70B:0:0:71B:CF70 (talk) 21:49, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current Role
Talk:Northern Ireland Public Service Alliance

message: I'm going to revert the article to its original statements concerning the nature of Broad Left/Unity factions on the basis of the following statement:
"There are two main grouping on the General Council, NIPSA Broad Left and NIPSA Unity. Broad Left is traditionally seen as the more trotskyite within NIPSA, having evolved from the Time for Change grouping which where only interested in control of the organisation whereas NIPSA Unity would often be seen to be more wide and inclusive of what the unions members wanted it to be as long as you don't count members who want to go on strike."
If you're going to make derogatory statements about other groups you should perhaps learn some of the basics of the English language first.Milzo1986 (talk) 15:31, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broad Left/Unity Disagreements 

message: The Union is not referred to by anyone as the PSA or Public Service Alliance.
It is called NIPSA in all official correspondence from the Union itself, by the ICTU and media outlets such as the BBC, Ulster Television and The Belfast Telegraph.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Milzo1986 (talk • contribs) 22:20, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  NIPSA, not PSA
Talk:Napo (trade union)

message: Please change "Napo (formerly the National Association of Probation Officers) is the trade union that represents probation officers and Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service reporters in the United Kingdom." to "Napo (formerly the National Association of Probation Officers) is the trade union that represents probation officers and Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service staff in the United Kingdom." Thank you.212.42.177.45 (talk) 12:39, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: You can do this yourself. This page is not protected. Debresser (talk) 13:18, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request on 11 May 2012 
Talk:NASUWT

message: Neutrality disputed - Re: Agreement, 'Raising Standards and Tackling Workload'
The final paragraph attempts to document some of the controversy over the signing of the above agreement in 2003 which looked at teachers' workload. However, sources are not cited and it is arguably written from a pretty partisan perspective (possibly in favour of the NUT). It needs re-writing or deleting altogether - and perhaps a seperate wiki page created to document this agreement. --Steelson80 22:13, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The second sentence stated that: "The NASUWT is the only TUC-affiliated teachers' union to represent teachers in England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales." While this is factually correct (the NUT does not represent teachers in NI and Scotland), it can also be very misleading, suggesting that the NASUWT were the only CUT-affiliated teachers' union in England, the only one in Scotland, and the only one in Wales etc. The significant fact that the exclusivity implied relates only to NI and Scotland is not made clear. 86.179.8.189 (talk) 07:58, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The only TUC-affiliated union? 

message: Due to concerns over accuracy and WP:OTRS Ticket#: 2007041710015772, I have removed all unsourced material from this article.  Do not, I repeat, DO NOT add any material the does not conform with wikipedia's policies includeing (but not limited to) WP:ATT, WP:NOR and WP:NPOV.  ---J.S  (T/C/WRE) 04:51, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stubbed 

message: Saying that someone's comments "have caused outrage" (note the present tense) strikes me as highly emotive, the language of tabloid newspapers rather than an encyclopedia. We have a one sentence summary of what was said. We have a summary of the outcome of the comments (they "caused controversy"). Two sentences is more than enough weight to place on this extremely minor event in the Union's history. Please note also "lead" - a type of metal; "led" - the past tense of the verb "to lead". --Lo2u (T • C) 19:10, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last sentence
Talk:National Union of Journalists

message: Not paid enough? Incompetent? Why hire a unionised journalist.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.141.16.225 (talk) 13:55, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why are the Journalists striking? 

message: What are NUJ chapels?Kaihsu (talk) 13:52, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: They're the basic unit of workplace organising in the union, what other unions call shops. Donnacha (talk) 23:50, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  chapels?
Talk:National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers

message: I added the  tag to the 2007 strike section. I think it is important to include views from all sides. Currently there is no information about the RMT position on the strike. Both the BBC and the RMT have information that should be incorporated.--Bookandcoffee 00:10, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Without wishing to predict the future, I imagine we're about to see a similar level of activity. What is most important is that we treat TfL and the RMT with equal weighting. A statement/opinion/claim made by one should be counterbalanced by the relevant statement/opinion/claim of the other. But if all the independant, reliable sources say one thing, we shouldn't automatically ignore this fact in the name of balance.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.13.161.114 (talk) 06:10, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Balance on 2007 strike

message: Hi there, am I right in saying this sentence in the summary of the article shouldn't be there without citation?
82.28.207.187 (talk) 15:09, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "widely regarded as one of the more radical trade unions in Great Britain" 

message: I've just revised slightly the third paragraph regarding the union's supposed pro-Russian allyship. One of the references is currently broken and a small amount of effort to fix it has come up to nothing, and I can't help but feel the whole section presents a highly non-neutral perspective backed up with possibly non-neutral sources. I've left it up since I don't feel strongly that it should come down, only that the section be improved and properly referenced and presented more neutrally - e.g. that the union response is included. eeveeman (talk) 22:38, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see the relevance of the paragraph, as it stands, as it's discussing views of some members of the union - admittedly two are prominent ones - not the position of the union itself.  I see there's an article on Eddie Dempsey which doesn't currently discuss his position on Russia and Ukraine, but a summary would be more appropriate there. Warofdreams talk 22:47, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree - I'm going to be bold and remove it, but if anyone really disagrees then they can revert and come here. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 06:23, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Glad such a simple resolution has been arrived at. Agree with the stance and action taken. eeveeman (talk) 11:45, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Affiliations - Pro Russia paragraph 

message: The article needs to clarify what Rail, Maritime and Transport occupations are covered by the different unions. E.g., drivers are more likely to join ASLEF. I don't know enough detail to contribute. Best wishes, Pol098 (talk) 14:43, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who are its members?
Talk:National Union of Teachers

message: Why is there no criticism of this organisation, when there is a lot online? This article seems awfully silent.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.46.25.144 (talk) 08:02, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Why no criticism?

message: In the AGM of 2008 the NUT voted to affiliate with Abortion Rights. This is not available online but there is evidence for it on the document here as the NUT are listed as a supporter. As such, the NUT are supporting a campaigning group that calls for the decriminalisation of sex selection abortion:   Position statement on sex selective abortions .  — Preceding unsigned comment added by MarieWarren (talk • contribs) 13:16, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Campaign to Support the decriminalisation of sex selection abortion
Talk:Batting order (cricket)

message: Hi,
I'd like to propose that the "or openers" is dropped from the section header. However, I'm aware that a lot of internal links whether redirects or anchors are linked to this, opening batsman or opening batsman. The latter, although correct, is a bit complicated and long winded.
Anybody got any ideas or thoughts?
–MDCollins (talk) 20:36, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: will, I think, solve the problem. eg == Opening batsman or openers == becomes == Opening batsman  ==. I haven't read the template page fully though, so check it. →Ollie (talk • contribs) 00:39, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening batsman or openers 

message: The article says
In some circumstances, if a player has been off the field during the opposition's innings for a long time, then he is not allowed to come in to bat until a certain number of overs have passed.
However, I was under the impression that it was actually the position in the batting order that was limited, not the number of overs. It's likely part of the Playing Conditions, though, and may well change depending on the type of game.
Teut (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 15:22, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Injury 

message: I haven't heard of "Top Order Batsmen" before. What this article calls the "Top Order" is the Middle Order (3, 4 and 5) and  the "Middle Order" is the Lower Order (6, 7 and 8), including all rounders and wicket-keepers. The batsmen at the top of teh batting order are usually called openers.Philipjelley (talk) 17:28, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I have just heard Ian Chappell refer to No 3 as a Top Order batsmen and No 5 as a Middle Order batsman (2009 Series commenting in the 2nd Test). Since many openers have been used in the No 3 position this makes sense if 1-3 are the Top Order Batsmen, then 4-6 as Middle OrderPhilipjelley (talk) 19:39, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Top Order
Talk:Truth Beyond...

message: I'm holding a not for sale promo version of this album. On MORBID RECORDS, not on Neoblast or Galy Records. Has there ever been a official release on Morbid Records?
The Data I can provide:
* MR: 099 
* 085-09352 
* Release date: March 17th, 2003
Anyone?
Oxygene7-13 (talk) 17:57, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Different edition on different label