Talk:Einar Jónsson

message: :Image:BirthOfPsycheEJ.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 04:54, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:BirthOfPsycheEJ.jpg

message: :Image:SpringEJ.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 05:33, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:SpringEJ.jpg

message: have been having troubles with my (as in I took them and loaded them) pictures, here and other places, so I am removing them.  Have removed them. It was fun while it lasted.  Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 19:10, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  the wikipolice 

message: Last section of this entry reads like New Age hokum; author presents unsubstantiated New Age metaphysics---vague, generalized assertions about poorly defined, unprovable concepts such karma---as if all readers will be conversant with them and, more to the point, share the author's belief in them. Reads like an evangelical tract for New Age belief.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Markdery (talk • contribs) 13:25, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Einar is no longer around to write or correct the article on himself, the way some others on wikipedia can. I suspect that the section that you refer to as "New Age hokum" was written by an Icelander to whom English is not his/her first language.  I also believe that it is probably a fairly close approximation of what Einar believed.  Due to copyright issues (Iceland in NOT copyright friendly) images of his work can't be posted here.  However to assume, as you seem to be doing, that "karma' is a new age concoction is missing the point.  By several thousand years.  More to the point, Einar was associated with the theosophy movement that was current when he was young, though he gave it his own very personal slant. In any case that philosophy is loaded with "karma".  His works, paintings and sculptures are heavily populated with angels, who popularity today might land them squarely in the middle of the "New Age hokum" mire, only he was doing them almost a  century ago.  The King of Atlantis, New  Age hokum? Well, maybe, but also the title of a powerful piece of sculpture.  Earth, Air, Fire & Water, combining to give birth to Psyche - "New Age hokum?"  Perhaps, but also one of Einar's works.  And so it goes.  I agree that the section of the article that you are referring to could be better written and better sourced, but I do not believe that it is wrong. Carptrash (talk) 14:51, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  This does indeed read a little bit like New Age-speak/original research, such as when the author tries to explain Jonsson's art through the definition of such terms as Karma (a definition that is quite New Age-y). That said, it is quite possible that Jonsson himself subscribed to New Age ideas, as such things were quite popular and even mainstream in his time (personally I wonder if there are connections between Jonsson and Theosophically-inspired works like Robet E. Howard’s Conan). The section also reads a bit fan-boy/girl-y, with which I can sympathize but it does not make for a very objective reading. Did Jonsson, or anyone else, ever describe his work and style? If so, this should be referenced in the body of the text. If not, well, then this article is original research… and as much as I suspect the research might be accurate enough, it wouldn’t stand up to Wikipedia standards. Now, I am sure SOMEONE in Iceland or elsewhere must have written on Jonsson’s style and philosophy, and those in the know should work to translate Icelandic reviews and analysis, and reference Icelandic work in this article. Vithar Alderland (talk) 19:10, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Last section

message: The article talks about Jonsson's "three styles", but what is described isn't really styles of art, more different types of work he did (i.e. who commisioned them and such). So, I wonder, what would you call Jonsson's style(s)? Some sort of Art Deco sylization perhaps? Thanks. Vithar Alderland (talk) 20:32, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Style?

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:23, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:38, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion