lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Eddie Fontaine

message: Eddie was not in The Gallant Men...it was COMBAT.
::Nope, it was TGM Gwen Gale 03:32, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Beorhtwulf of Mercia

message: *"Beorhtric's reign, saw the first recorded Viking attacks on Mercia,..." Is this a slip for Beorhtwulf? The long disracting aside in the opening sentence might well go into a footnote. Otherwise, what a good job of tuning this up to concert pitch! --Wetman (talk) 07:56, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It was indeed a slip. Many thanks, Angus McLellan  (Talk) 09:53, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reign

message: According to :Image:GreatBritain802.png, Mercia is to the north of London (which looks like it would be at the junctions of Wessex, Kent, and Essex). Of course, that was the year 802, so did Mercia expand by the time the Vikings attacked it? howcheng  {chat} 18:53, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind, I should have read the Mercia article more carefully. howcheng  {chat} 18:55, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  London 

message: Is it known which son is older?
If it is known that Beorhtric is older, then I would suggest changing "Beorhtfrith and Beorhtric" to "Beorhtric and Beorhtfrith".  If it is not known which son is older, then I would suggest changing "The story of Beorhtwulf's second son, Beorhtfrith" to "The story of Beorhtwulf's other son, Beorhtfrith" Bluap (talk) 02:42, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: A good point! Thanks, Angus McLellan  (Talk) 10:18, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The two sons 

message: I've just reverted an edit which reorganized the article and deleted two paragraphs in the lead and at least one paragraph elsewhere -- possibly more than one, but the diff is a bit hard to follow.  I've no objection in principle to a reorganization, but the deletion, without any justification in the edit summary or on the talk page, seemed necessary to revert.  If anyone thinks the re-added material should go, please comment. Mike Christie (talk - contribs -  library) 23:53, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent revert 

message: Since Beorhtwulf will be an FA in a few days, couldn't you show some pity for those of us who are not historians and identify Mercia as a nation within Great Britain in the first paragraph. For all we know, "King of the Mercians" might be the leader of a New Orleans marching band. 
For example, you could say: Beorhtwulf (also spelled Berhtwulf) (died 852) was King of Mercia, an Anglo-Saxon realm centered in what is now known as the English Midlands, from 839 or 840 until his death. Beorhtwulf's ancestry is unknown...
Just a suggestion. --RoyGoldsmith (talk) 00:51, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Mike Christie (talk - contribs -  library) 11:32, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Identify Mercia 

message: Museum Victoria (in Australia) has a Beorhtwulf penny.  See http://museumvictoria.com.au/collections/items/58237/coin-penny-berhtwulf-mercia-england-circa-850-ad.  It would be great if Wikipedian in Australia could photograph the penny and upload it. Greenshed (talk) 07:59, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coinage 
Talk:Mousa Ali

message: this 1945 map seems to show 'Mt Mussalli' as being 2063 meters in height. EdwardLane (talk) 17:08, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  old map 

message: Its says the last eruption was in the the "Holocene era" 
We are in the Holocene era, so it doesn't seem to be correct. 
I will be bold and change it to "pre-Holocene era"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.153.157.2 (talk) 07:27, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't understand how it's incorrect since it would suggest the latest eruption occurred in the last 12,000 years. Volcanoguy 13:19, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last Eruption?
Talk:Nabro Volcano

message: Dear wikipedians,
The volcano region was recently shaken by few earth quakes. According to USGS reports Event ID are
1.usc00045f9, 2.usc00045p7,
3.usc00045vg,
4.usc00045xc are possible to trigger the volcano activity. Any one get valuable information about the event, please update it. Thanks in advance. Gnuismail (talk) 21:29, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Sources are very scarce for unknown reasons and public reports will likely be hard to come by. Additionally, the media is getting confused with the nearby Dubbi Volcano (despite satellite images clearly showing it's Nabro) and stating that Dubbi erupted. Hopefully they'll figure it out soon. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 17:04, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  recent earth quakes and volcano activity 

message: Could someone improve the English of this section? Can't understand it at all.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.72.27.186 (talk) 08:39, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  geology? 

message: Could someone with a good atlas or broadband connection put in the introduction:
how far from the coast of the Red Sea?
how far from Djibouti and Asmara (or someplace nearby in Ethiopia)?69.72.27.186 (talk) 09:01, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction- the big picture 

message: This looks like a good overview and seems to suggest that Nabro/Mallahle complex had a VEI 6 (or even 7?!!) eruption sometime in the quaternary period.
EdwardLane (talk) 20:50, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  General eruptive history stuff VEI 7 
Talk:Rowrbrazzle

message: Since it appears the mini-fracas about deleting this article had to do with the paucity of sources about Rowrbrazzle, the question comes up: does anyone have anything that would verify Rowrbrazzle's existence in a way that makes people happier with its presence here? It doesn't strike me as something that's less significant than many of the pop culture items that are documented in Wikipedia, but its significance mostly predates the internet, making it hard to find things you can just go out and link to. (There's never been, AFAIK, a Rowrbrazzle web site, for instance, although there are contributors who have web sites that refer to it.) The "Wikifur" article is, presumably, a tertiary source, although it does its best to list its own primary and secondary sources. Is it inappropriate to at least link to the Wikifur page from this article, given that it's about as close as we're evidently gonna get to a web site "for" Rowrbrazzle? ChipotleCoyote 23:20, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A link might be viewed as OK. It is probably never going to work as a reference, as WikiFur does not require people to identify themselves, and does allow original research. The page is most likely accurate - it's been edited by a number of members of the group - but there's no authority to attribute it to. References work best when they are never changed after initial publication and are written by one person or a defined group of identifiable people who have easily-established credibility. GreenReaper 07:00, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Finding Sources 

message: Relative traffic to this article is low, but I'm keeping importance at mid due to its historical impact to the fandom. GreenReaper (talk) 15:41, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importance
Talk:Lev Shestov

message: What is the rationale behind the thomson quote?  It is not clear whether shestov read thomson, or whether somebody writing this entry found their outlooks comparable.  If the latter, it seems inappropriate to quote such a large amount of thomson...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.144.236.112 (talk) 01:16, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree; I have removed the James Thomson quote, as well as references to The Lev Shestov Society homepage (http://shestov.by.ru/index.html), which is no longer online. Languagehat (talk) 19:12, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:   The City of Dreadful Night 

message: Shestov and Fondane both despised the existentialists and Fondane distinguished both his own philosophy and his teacher's from existentialism in his criticisms of Sartre. The scholarship portraying him as an 'existentialist' is quite dated (refer to Fondane's Existential Monday & the Sunday of History). Would anyone object if I removed that adjective?
--68.134.230.117 (talk) 17:41, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Existentialist 

message: > 'Reason' is the obedience to and the acceptance of Certainties that tell us that certain things are eternal and unchangeable and other things are impossible and can never be attained. This accounts for Shestov's philosophy being a form of irrationalism, though it is important to note that the thinker does not oppose reason, or science in general, but only rationalism and scientism: the tendency to consider reason as a sort of omniscient, omnipotent God that is good for its own sake. It may also be considered a form of personalism: people cannot be reduced to ideas, social structures, or mystical oneness. Shestov rejects any mention of "omnitudes", "collective", "all-unity." 
no source and the statement is completly unrelated to shestovs thoughts,its dishonest to call him not opposed to reason and would require revisionist reading of the worst kind. 5.46.204.235 (talk) 06:05, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  nebuch
Talk:Dallol (volcano)

message: Is the "dallol" in Dallol Bosso unrelated etymologically to the name of the volcano? ZFT (talk) 19:38, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology 

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that the featured picture :File:ET Afar asv2018-01 img48 Dallol.jpg, which is used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for January 8, 2021. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2021-01-08. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:50, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:ET Afar asv2018-01 img48 Dallol.jpg]] scheduled for POTD
Talk:Tonyukuk

message: This site claims "47º21´N, 107º45´E, 65 km southeast from Ulaanbaatar", but there seems to be nothing there. 
It is also in obvious conflict with the site near Nalaikh described by Ross, in modern travel guides, and reported by people on the internet who have actually visited the site. 
I thought maybe there are two monuments, but kaznpu.kz clearly says that this is the "Bayn Tsokto" site. So it seems they just got the coordinates wrong. 
They also claim the site is called "Tsagaa Ovoo", which is probably a mistake derived from the fist one(?), and this name made it onto Wikipedia, and from there all over the internet. 
There is a site with this name, Tsagaan-Ovoo, Dornod, but it someplace else entirely. 
--dab (𒁳) 11:36, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Please read the books of Osman Fikri Sertkaya. Tonyukuk was still alive in 731! Böri (talk) 10:35, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Which book? Prof. Pedantic (talk) 16:28, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  I don't have to show anything! Osman Fikri Sertkaya says " The Tonyukuk Monument" was a reply to "The Köl Tigin Monument". So the Tonyukuk Monument was written after the Köl Tigin Monument. Böri (talk) 15:08, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  He didn't die in 724! 

message: title. Prof. Pedantic (talk) 15:58, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  first external link leads me to a pornography website, please remove
Talk:Boso of Provence

message: Boso makes it happen 174.250.211.177 (talk) 21:26, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boso saved her 

message: In the section "Countship", it says, "Louis was reigning as a subordinate king of Aquitaine, but because of his youth, it was Boso who looked after the administration of that realm."
According to the Wikipedia article on Louis the Stammerer, he was born in 846 and so would have been 26 years old when Boso was appointed as his chamberlain. That would render the phrase "because of his youth" rather meaningless. Hence, I have requested a clarification in the text.
(The statement is also unsourced, so perhaps it should simply be deleted). Nikolaj1905 (talk) 14:00, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Louis II's alleged youth
Talk:Branimir of Croatia

message: Was Branimir personally involved in the battle? The referenced source doesn't actually say. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 09:52, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  involvement in the battle of September 18, 887 

message: This is disputed, so I removed the claim, noting the Croatian Diplomacy Day instead, which is at least not controversial.
While there are indeed reasonably solid sources that do support the original statement about the "first time that the Croatian state was officially recognized", this is disputed by historians who argue that the modern concept of international recognition cannot be retroactively applied to a medieval setting. GregorB (talk) 09:57, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The first time that the Croatian state was officially recognized"
Talk:Saint John Ogilvie High School

message: Tell us about the history. What is taught at the school? Extra-curricular activities? Pics? References? Dahliarose 20:39, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assess

message: The school seems to be named after Saint John Ogilvie.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.158.232.88 (talk) 11:00, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Saint 
Talk:Agate (nuclear test)

message: found this at random, sounds like interesting:  The CIEES (Inter-arms Special Weapons Test Center)
 available in french at http://fuseurop.univ-perp.fr/sahara_f.htm ]
Shame On You 23:34, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: CEES sahara..?

message: need a chart instead of a listr for programme, i have no time now, if anyone can do it thanks. Shame On You 23:36, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: chart

message: create beryl incident article and move in section about agathe series known incidents, with mention of vive la bombe mockudrama. Shame On You 02:17, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: improve
Talk:Theodore Solomons

message: Talk: Theodore Solomons
The link embedded in the article on Theodore Solomons section on his 1892 Sierra hike goes to the Wikipedia Joseph LeConte entry.  Joseph LeConte is the father of Joseph Nisbet LeConte. The link should actually go to the Joseph Nisbet LeConte Wikipedia entry, as he was the companion of Solomons during the 1892 hike.  See the Shirley Sargent book, referenced at the end of the Solomons article.
Karen Merritt
kmerritt@ucmerced.edu
136.152.144.187 23:35, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Karen Merritt is right.  I corrected the link to Joseph Nisbet LeConte, and will make additional improvements.  It seems to me that the article now contains a lot of extraneous information about assorted relatives. That should be trimmed, and more about Solomons life should be added. Cullen328 (talk) 22:06, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bruno, Duke of Saxony

message: Discrepancy Note: 
There is a discrepancy here.  Duke Bruno was born in 780 and died in 843, not 880.  His son's son also named Bruno may be the count that was reported dead at the river, but this is not the Bruno Duke of Saxony geneaology is familiar with.  Bruno Duke of Saxony's fathers name was WIGEBART Duke of Saxony(760-825).
Liudolph was born in 806 and died in 866, whereas Duke Bruno lived from 780-843.
It is also possible these genealogy reports refer to Bruno, FATHER of Liudolph.(?)
Genealogy Report: Count LIUDOLF Duke of East Saxons 0806-0866
Father:  BRUNO Duke of Saxony 0780-0843
Mother: SUANA of Montfort 0780-?
This seemed to be rather speculative, I replaced with a summary about the issue. -- Jake (talk) 17:03, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved from article 
Talk:Tôn Thất Đính

message: This article barely passes over Dinh's later life in the US, which should at least have a section IMO. It also doesn't mention his death except the date. It therefore fails Featured article criterion 1b, comprehensiveness. Also, this is fairly minor, but this article should be written in American English as the Vietnam War is of predominantly American interest. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 16:44, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Later life missing 

message: The following biography of Lucien Conein is relatively recent and outlines his role in the 1963 South Vietnamese coup:
:
Perhaps someone more familiar with subject matter can tell where it might fill in the gaps. - Location (talk) 19:05, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potential source
Talk:Grasshopper mouse

message: Is Onychomys in the correct subfamily?  Isn't it Sigmodontinae? TeamZissou 23:42, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Musser and Carleton (2005; Mammal Spp. of the World 3) split the New World rats and mice into three subfamilies Neotominae, Tylomyinae, and Sigmodontinae.  This was a change from their approach in the earlier version (Musser and Carleton, 1993; MSW 2) where all NW rats and mice were in one subfamily.  --Aranae 00:42, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Man and Superman

message: This article seems wrong about the production of the play. It was performed in New York on Broadway in 1905-06. Am I missing something else? Not sure why there is the whole bit about it never being performed until 1917?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wickie27 (talk • contribs) 22:40, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I tried to fix it. Is it better? I'm not an experienced copyeditor, and work better from a blank page I think. I'll look over it again when I have time. --Kenneth M Burke 01:05, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: I think that a brief synopsis would greatly improve the quality of the article.--Dark Green (talk) 17:55, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Synopsis 

message: Could you please explain how Shaw was 'influenced' by the term coined by Nietzsche ? If you regard 'man' as the median, there are only two vertical ways to go: up and down. The question at issue here is not the banal nature of the word itself, but what was intended by it. Do you think Shaw was thinking on the same lines as Nietzsche ? (Pamour (talk) 17:35, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  superman 

message: A magazine image from the first staging can be found here.  We know what Shaw looks like (as in the current image) and it adds nothing to the article — this new one, showing Ann regarding Tanner in a slightly predatory way, would be more apt. I imagine  there's a free use or other acceptable licence for its inclusion in the article but as an unregistered editor, I can't add it. --217.155.32.221 (talk) 21:26, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Accepted for inclusion — thanks User:NickW557. --86.157.225.91 (talk) 20:00, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

text: The first link in the section. indicated as "here", is a dead link. Josh-Levin@ieee.org (talk) 17:31, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  More relevant image
Talk:Ácido Argentino

message: Page created.
Added front and back covers. Elchafa 23:46, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page created 
Talk:Charles James Martin (physiologist)

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/34903. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kateshortforbob (talk • contribs) 19:29, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Wihtred of Kent

message: There's a quote by Wihtred here that may be useful within the laws section. HansHermans 00:08, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting.  I can't tell from the attribution, but it looks like it might be a translation of part of this.  I'll do some more digging and see if I can find more about this.  Thanks for the link. Mike Christie (talk) 10:37, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Quote by Wihtred

message: I'm a Spanish user (so sorry for my English) and I'm trasnlating the article to Spanish. I've found a posible mistake but I prefer to ask before. The article says that Ecgberht died in 675 but in his own article appears tha he died in 673 that is more consistent with the facts. Thanks. --Millars (talk) 12:08, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the article says Ecgberht died in 673; can you point to where it says 675?  Mike Christie (talk) 12:40, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: In the first sentence of "Kent in the late seventh century" section. --Millars (talk) 00:44, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It says "The dominant force in late seventh-century politics south of the River Humber was Wulfhere of Mercia, who reigned from the late 650s to 675. The king of Kent for much of this time was Ecgberht, who died in 673."  It's Wulfhere who died in 675; Ecgberht died in 673. So I'm still not clear what the problem is. Mike Christie (talk) 01:03, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ups, It's ok, it was a terrible confusion with the names, sorry. --Millars (talk) 17:43, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ecgberht's death 

message: The third son is shown as Ælfric in the text and Alric in the infobox. Dudley Miles (talk) 22:16, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll have to look at the sources for this, if not tonight then tomorrow.  I evidently forgot to come back to this -- see the section above. Mike Christie (talk - contribs -  library) 22:49, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Now fixed; I don't have access to the ODNB, but Bede, the other source, shows "Alric", and that's where the link goes from the only instance of Ælfric, so this appears to be just a mistake of some kind. Mike Christie (talk - contribs -  library) 11:31, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Query 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Of Kent Wihtred. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  -- Tavix (talk) 20:26, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Of Kent Wihtred" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Wu Daozi

message: My Encyclopedia Americana mentions an eighth-century Buddhist painter named Wu Tao-Tzu. It lists him as living from 700 to 770 though. Is it the same guy or a different one?--T. Anthony (talk) 18:43, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: One paragraphs say some of his work survives today.  Another paragraph says none do.
Which is it?--23.119.204.117 (talk) 04:36, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Work exists or not?