lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Phylogenetic network

message: The main figure of this article seems to depict a tree. 
Although the nature article from which the figure is taken calls this a network, it is a tree (no reticulations).
Trees are also networks, as this article clearly states, so this is no problem on itself.
However, it might be nice to have a main figure with at least one reticulation.
I propose we replace the current main figure with a (published) explicit phylogenetic network with at least one reticulation.
RemJanssen (talk) 15:36, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Main Figure

message: This article can profit from more information about what information can be found in which kinds of phylogenetic networks. Explicit rooted networks can, for example, be seen as the highways for flow of genetic information. Gene trees (trees for parts of the genome that do not recombine, not necessarily functional genes) must fit in the network. Explicit rooted networks with extra information such as branch lengths and admixture probabilities can also be obtained, for example with Phylonet. Such networks are most like the phylogenetic trees biologists like to use (Such a network would be nice as main figure). 
There should also be more emphasis on the fact that splits networks are data display networks, and not explicit networks. Their popularity is mainly due to their ease of use. They do not, however, represent an evolutionary history (phylogeny)! 
85.148.50.244 (talk) 14:51, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Extra topics needed
Talk:Bondage pants

message: It should be easy to cite references foe 'established facts'. User:Pedant 22:16, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Established facts' 

message: The tighter bondage trousers, with lots of zips, and straps attached to d-rings with dog clips were designed by the Punk Boutique BOY; owned by Stephan Raynor.  BOY also took over the production of Vivienne Westwood and Malcolm McLarens bondage suits in the early 80's when Seditionaries changed its name to Worlds End.  Is it against Wikipedias policy to put up a picture of Malcolm McLaren wearing the red tartan bondage suit in The Great Rock n Roll Swindle?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.63.207.145 (talk) 02:26, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  BOY and picture 

message: I've looked at a fair number of BDSM shops online and read a few books thereon and so on, but I have found nary a mention of bondage pants anywhere. The baggy sort (the only sort that I am familiar with) also seem much too loose to be any use in securing a person. Especially as this article is categorized as BDSM equipment as well as fetish wear, can someone please clarify what relation, if any, bondage pants have with actual bondage?
IsaacSapphire (talk) 08:46, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Actual BDSM use?

message: I'm a bit confused about the statement regarding the possible origins being homeless people. The straps are there so they could hold onto a train? What the heck does that mean? They strapped their pants to a train? What possible good does that do? Could someone who know what this is all about please rewrite that sentence so it makes some sense?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.254.65.130 (talk) 14:27, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Homeless?
Talk:Haplogroup P (Y-DNA)

message: I figured that we can compile data of the new haplogroup P2 😀
It is fascinating that the cousin of YDNA P1(Q&R); P2 is found almost exclusively in the Philippines. This solidifies the theory that YDNA P* has origins in the Sundaland area. 
As a side note:
If we can find the age of P2, then we can find an approximate age when P1* entered Siberia Simonater2 (talk) 02:54, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Any new Updates on the newly discovered Ydna P2? (Compilation) 

message: , , Hello, requesting to take note of this page as it needs some updates and clean up. 
There is new root for P* now called P-M1254* due to discovery of sample in Malaysia from Jehai in Perak. 
*Article about new root https://dna-explained.com/2020/09/12/y-dna-haplogroup-p-gets-a-brand-new-root-plus-some-branches/  
*Additional information https://www.yfull.com/tree/P/
 has sourced this branching map with new root finding. 
*"The greatest diversification of P was in Southeast Asia, and would have originated about 44,000 years ago.[1] P-PF5850* was found in Perak (Malaysia) and P-M1254* was found in human remains on the Andaman Islands.[1] P (xP1), or more exactly P-295 (xQ,R) was found in eastern Indonesia, in Timor, Sumba and Celebes;[2] while P2 was found in the Philippines.[3]" - "The presence of P in Siberia would be ancient, since the haplogroup P-P337* was found in human remains called "Yana" in Yakutia, Yana Valley, in the Siberian Arctic, which is 32 thousand years old."
''
*It appears to be P-PF5850* (Malaysia), P-M1254* in Andaman, P (xP1) P-295 (xQ,R) in Indonesia, Timor, Sumba, Celebs, while P2 in Phillipes. Yana samples in Siberia are P-P337*. 
Can you guys look into this? 117.198.112.79 (talk) 03:32, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I can try to look into this when I find some time. Perhabs ping  who has more knowledge on haplogroup-specific topics.-Wikiuser1314 (talk) 12:49, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: New root
Talk:Good government

message: OK, this is definitely POV ("the opposite is self-government?).  Regardless of the merits of the good govt. movement, there needs to be a neutral encyclopedic discussion.  I'll come back in a bit and clean this up, but for now I've added the NPOV header. Meelar (talk) 04:09, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

message: This article does not really capture the debate over "good government" very well. It does not cite its sources. Furthermore, it does not provide a history or the importance of this term. The article should furthermore highlight the relationship to good governance. Finally, "good government" also has a special meaning in former British colonies such as Hong Kong or Singapore. There it refers to effecient rule and nonpartisanship. I may be able to write about that in the future. --Ghormax (talk) 10:50, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unclear and too narrow 

message: Muslim Perspectives on Justice, Peace, Diversity, and Good Government http://ustpaul.ca/upload-files/HumanSciences/cours_2012_13/Justice_Peace_Diversity_and_Good_Government.pdf 79.251.121.59 (talk) 15:02, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course a Sharia-compliant way of "Good government" won't create a secular democracy, instead it will lead to an Islamic theocracy (hakimiyya Allah; caliphate). 79.251.121.59 (talk) 15:05, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good government and Sharia-compliant political Islam 

message: I propose that  this page be internationalized, and a page created for Good government (United States) into which the page Goo-goos would be merged.E.M.Gregory (talk) 19:15, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger Discussion
Talk:Genetic divergence

message: Cause of genetic divergence?
  Yes genetic divergence can be easily seen with the separation of two populations over time.  But some more information can be added about how this change occurs.  Does change or divergence occur gradually or in contrast during flux periods?  Examples for both would help this page a lot.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doherty.76 (talk • contribs) 16:15, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Template talk:Underoath

message: Underoath are not emo influenced band. I wouldn't consider praising God to be something emo. They just got lighter since Spencer joined and Spencer's screaming resembled a more Screamo sound however the band is still a Metalcore/ Hardcore band.  Because TOCS sounds more like screamo although I don't think it had much emo influenced lyrics it attracted some emo fan base which is fine, I guess. They're Only Chasing Safety was they're only fluke. They didn't even like that album. Define The Great Line is a little bit harder since that's what they really wanted to go for. I wouldn't see anything wrong with listening to all of Underoath's music.
I think all their stuff is good. I think they're still considered Metalcore. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.169.83.227 (talk) 16:55, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  You can just listen to both 

message: The singles need to be listed in this template. --How may I serve you? Marshall Williams2  Talk Autographs Contribs 02:33, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a navigational template, which is intended to facilitate reader navigation among related and existing articles. None of Underoath's songs have any articles, thus they should not be listed in this template. They existed for a time, but were deleted shortly thereafter for failing to satisfy the notability criteria. Fezmar9 (talk) 03:42, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Singles
Talk:Stephen Funk

message: At this edit a tag was left asking for notability. Please be more specific in your reason for including such a tag in this article.  Thank you. - Boyd Reimer (talk) 19:38, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: There's no reason to have a notability tag, here, however. Whether we want to title the article "Stephen Funk" or "Unauthorized Absence of Stephen Funk", some form of article will exist. I'm removing the tag for now. Khazar2 (talk) 17:19, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Please explain the specific reason for the notability tag
Talk:Windows Live Writer

message: These links to plugin collections are relevant: they pertain to complete collections of plugins, not individual ones. --Cynthiaishere 04:24, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

message: Shouldn't most of the external links be removed? They add no value to the article. FFMG 05:19, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Links 

message: Windows Live Writer has been opened sourced and forked as Open Live Writer. Should we rename this article or create a new article called "Open Live Writer"?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by NazmusLabs (talk • contribs) 19:30, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Program has been Open Sourced. New Article or Rename this article?
Talk:Jersey Boys: Original Broadway Cast Recording

message: I was going to put some categories at the bottom, but for some reason, I couldn't do it correctly. I would also like to include an image, etc. If you have any ideas, please contact me on my Talk Page. Arrowhead1 04:26, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Creation 

message: Need cement￼ A. R. S. S. Traders (talk) 06:05, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cement
Talk:Republic Bank & Trust Company

message: Can someone please add information about the recent partnership with Humana and its new branches that it has opened up.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.130.195.124 (talk) 23:48, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Content add request

message: I moved the section below to the talk page until the content can be sourced per WP:RS, not the company website. Flowanda | Talk 09:37, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Sourcing for "Community Initiatives" section
Talk:Haplogroup Q (mtDNA)

message: The map image lacks Haplogroup Q. 4.242.235.207 (talk) 18:59, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I put the map that has Q.--Maulucioni (talk) 18:18, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map 
Talk:Cancer Genome Project

message: Cancer Genome Project--Jmmy2013 (talk) 04:57, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

message: Hi, I will be editing this article throughout the next few weeks as part of AdGen 2015 at Western University. Hmcmath (talk) 18:05, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I am working on paraphrasing my sources, but I intend to change the majority of this article. My research shows that the cancer genome project is more of an international effort than what the current article reflects. I plan to make an overview of what the project is, what it is for, and who all is participating in it. I may expand to include sections for what countries and organizations are heading what research, the progress it has allowed for in cancer treatment and detection, and the goals moving forward. Adterry17 (talk) 01:14, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Upcoming Edits 

message: Is the Cancer Genome Project the same as the Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes (or well at least part thereof) See here ?
KVDP (talk) 10:56, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes
Talk:Sabah National Parks Trustees

message: merge? Sabah Parks
:Agreed. I think the articles are just duplicates. I will place the required templates on the page. — Ambuj Saxena (talk) 17:08, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ok. how do we do this? i dont this there will be much dispute if we just go ahead with the merge, coz its been a while already. kawaputra 04:03, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:South Australian Premier Cricket

message: A list of winners might be a good way to improve this article and point out which team articles may be most worth creating.
Garrie 04:44, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done (or started at least) - a bit sketchy on more recent premierships and the formatting is basic to say the least.  If I need a break from editing Aussie rules material I will come back and tackle the History a bit more. Pudgey 11:08, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Winners?
Talk:Antinuclear antibody

message: Both pages appear to be on the same topic, but this page seems more recent and more complete. Snowy150 (talk) 08:29, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed. I merged it to here. Feel free to complement from that article's history if you think I forgot anything important. Mikael Häggström (talk) 17:56, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merger with [[Antinuclear antibodies]] page

message: I have a History of both High and Normal ANA Levels, and I found the Compounds that raise my ANA Level, in Medications and Foods and some Bacteria and Fungi, and made my ANA Level Normal to stop the pain. I need a peer review of my findings on my talk page, we may be able to lower other People/s ANA Level to stop the pain. Stopping taking Medications  is the only way to stop the pain and Lower the ANA Level,  because all of their pains Medications and Antibiotics and most of the other classes of Medications, contain Inert Ingredients that raise my ANA Level, causing the Immune System to destroy many different parts of my Body that show up on CAT Scans and X-rays and Urine Tests afterwards.
JosephLoegering (talk) 05:11, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: History of High and Normal ANA Levels

message: To interpret an ANA, you need a decent pre-test probability: doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2012.09.014 JFW | T@lk 21:28, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Jacob, I have very recently done a lot of work on this ANA article here I am going to upload it to the main ANA article this week so I will add something about this into what I have already done. Simon Caulton (talk) 11:05, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs a pre-test probability 

message: When reading the Anti-Sm sectioned this sentence stood out to me: "Approximately 99% of individuals with anti-Sm antibodies have the disease, but only 20% of people with SLE have the antibodies." I'm guessing that this is attempting to put specificity and sensitivity in laymen's terms, in which case the second half of the sentence is correct but the first half is dead wrong. Assuming a sensitivity of 20%, a specificity of 99% and a prevalence of SLE of 50 per 100 000, that gives us about 1% probability that a random individual with anti-Sm antibodies actually have SLE. See also positive and negative predictive values. I changed the wording the better reflect what specificity actually is --kissekatt (talk) 05:58, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Good spot! That was my fLub :S Simon Caulton (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flubbed definition/statistics? 

message: Current lab reports include the term 'AC - pattern': Anti-Cellular pattern. The idea being that the antibodies not only target nuclear material, but also cytoplasmic components. 
However I don't read anything about this in the article; somebody know more about this? 2A02:1812:1601:A300:198D:2E3A:6768:FB48 (talk) 10:08, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  ANA not strictly nuclear
Talk:Mononuclear phagocyte system

message: According to this introduction, monocytes are participating in the Reticuloendothelial system, but according to the introduction on Lymphoma, the lymphocytes are participating in the Reticuloendothelial system. It is clear on Image:Illu_blood_cell_lineage.jpg that they aren't the same thing. So which one is present there? Perhaps both? Mikael Häggström 17:31, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I made some own research at  and  and found that: Histiocytes and monocytes, not histiocytes and lymphocytes, form the reticuloendothelial system. Lymphoma is now corrected. Mikael Häggström 07:22, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  monocytes or lymphocytes in the Reticuloendothelial system? 

message: Moved request for improvement here. Found under "Functions"
:"A meaningful outline of normal (extravascular) vs. abnormal (intravascular) hemolysis with more emphasis on macrophages would be helpful." Eyal (talk) 15:22, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improvement 

message: The article Reticuloendothelial system has recently been recreated, it was moved to this title in 2010. The source cited there is from 1998 and I'm having a hard time finding other sources to verify that it is generally accepted that these two things are different. – Þjarkur (talk) 11:50, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Closing stale 2019 proposal; uncontested objection and no support. Klbrain (talk) 10:31, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split or merge? – [[Reticuloendothelial system]]
Talk:Frances Carr, Countess of Somerset

message: Someone changed the spelling on the quote of the "ribald commentary" -- for the record, my source does spell it "whilest".  I won't change it back because someone else will probably change it again, anyway... but FYI, that is the spelling used in the original source I was quoting. Curtangel 04:46, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  whilest => whilst 

message: There are two articles about the same woman. Frances Howard, Duchess of Richmond and this article are about the same woman.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bstbll (talk • contribs) 20:39, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: They are not the same woman, both just happen to bear the same name.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 07:20, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm an idiot and I apologize. I just saw that they both lived around the same time, had the same name, and were both granddaughters of Dukes of Norfolk named Thomas and made an assumption. I don't know how I managed to miss the fact that their biographies were completely different. Sorry about that.Bstbll (talk) 04:50, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: You are not an idiot. You just made an honest mistake - as we all do. Don't worry about it. The endless repition of first names in royal and noble families often causes confusion.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 09:07, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger Proposal
Talk:Platform truck

message: I'm not happy with the cluttered appearance of the images in this article, but the images help to show specific items noted in the text.  Any suggestions?
Majorjc 04:47, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 

message: Majorjc, a lot of what you described about this unit is apparently specific to your unit in general. We operate a platform which has no pump and no attack lines. Quint has an article elswhere. Please keep all talk of quints within that article. Also, I cleaned up the article some. I may go back and add gallery which will help clean it up but I am too busy to do that now. --Daysleeper47 12:43, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Quint vs Platform

message: I am intending to ask for this article to be moved to 'Platform truck'. Reasons:
*Aerial platform is a much more generic term, which I want to disambiguate to point to the existing article Aerial work platform. Said article will then (under 'truck-mounted' lead back to this article at its Platform truck position. MadMaxDog 09:33, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Move to other name

message: This article needs to be moved back to it's original name.  You did not check existing links to this article before moving it. And in the fire service Aerial Apparatus texts it is classified and an aerial platform.
:No offense, but this article does not even call itself 'aerial platform' once in the article. I think that changing 'aerial platform' into the disambig state it is in now is a good compromise. See also arguments for it in the talk section above. 
:Maybe you would like to change the existing links to there to point to this article - I apologize for not having done this (sloppy work on my part), and will hold off on doing it myself for the moment, until we get some sort of agreement. Regards MadMaxDog 09:32, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move back to original name 

message: Is anyone preparing an article for articulating or telescopic booms? Should aerial platforms based on telescopic booms transferred from Fire Apparatus to a new article on articulating booms, or is this page suitable? The booms typically have a platform and ladders... Sorry, I do not have nowadays time to join the actual project on firefighting articles... :-( However, if someone wants to, I can easily find pictures and some information on old snorkels and pictures, too. Has there been any discussion on to which articles should various kind of units belong? Pöllö 07:25, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Booms
Talk:Opsonin

message: I made the changes seen in the opening paragraph because it is too exclusive. IgM would not be considered an opsonin by the old definition. However, I fear I have risked the original simplicity of the article. However, this is at least a place to start, because above all else, the page needs to be accurate.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Creightonian (talk • contribs) 22:41, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening paragraph 

message: I have updated the "varieties" section with a new method of separation (adaptive vs. innate), and rewrote the introduction to be more succinct. I have included new, more academic sources. I also drew some cartoons to illustrate the process a little bit. I hope you like the changes.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Immcarle154 (talk • contribs) 03:43, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redid page
Talk:Linnzi Zaorski

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Jreferee 18:53, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: Why did you change my assessment of the article Linnzi Zaorski from B to Start? --Mus Musculus 05:49, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Although the article has a meaningful amount of good content, it still seems weak in areas and most material for a complete article still may need to be added. For example, it seems weak on back story and a reader genuinely interested in the topic may be likely to seek additional information elsewhere. The main information of the article has 1,806 characters, which is slightly above a stub. I assessed the article as start from the article page using script. I was not actually aware that I was changing a WikiProject Biography assessment at the time I made the assessment. Generally, people do not assess their own articles. Please note, start is not a negative grade since are no negative grades in Wikipedia. Not that this went into the assessment, but more may need to be done for the licensing of the image. Please review the  Requesting copyright permission - When permission is confirmed. -- Jreferee 15:30, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment (copied from [[User_talk:Jreferee#Assessment|here]])
Talk:Complement component 3

message: I added some basic info and a more recent source than the 25-year-old nonspecific ones from before. But enzymatic regulation isn't really my forte, and I humbly ask someone more knowledgeable to add some detail to that section. Thank you! Just-a-can-of-beans (talk) 23:00, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion of Regulation section