lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Sufic philosophy

message: The subject of Sufic Philosophy has it's roots in the operating vehicle of the seven worlds of the senses; first seen with Attar. The figures of the sufis or the conscious agents of God's providence makes their true appearence "effaced"; they are not allowed to become too "visable"; as this seems to render them much less effective when they cannot come and go without being observed. However it is not generally mentioned of directly by anyone other than Ibn El-Arabi that the Unity of the 7 Spirits of God is the "Holy Spirit"; and more than this: the "Unity" of the 7 Lamps in which the 7 Spirits dwell is the Lamp of Allah; the Light of the Holy Spirit. The 7 lamps are thus the 7 days of creation.
This brings us to the principle of co-creation.Unicorn144 00:46, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sufic Philosophy
Talk:Köprülü family

message: I made a small change. In the table Kara Mustafa had been shown to be the grand vizier of Mehmet IV and Suleiman II. Actually Kara Mustafa was executed during the reign of Mehmet IV. So I cleared out the name Suleiman II in his box. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 08:24, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kara Mustafa 

message: Abaza Siyavuş Pasha was also a groom of the family. Since Merzifonlu Kara Mustafa Pasha is included in the list wouldn't be appropriate to include his name also ? (I don't know if he was adopted or not) I'll call the editor. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 10:53, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abaza Siyavuş 

message: At the moment he is listed in the article as a grand vizier. Köprülü Abdullah Pasha was an important man and a member of the Köprülü family, but a grand vizier he was not.  --Ukas (talk) 10:01, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Köprülü Abdullah Pasha
Talk:Landini cadence

message: It says:
:There could also be an inner voice; in the example the inner voice would move from F to G, in the same rhythm as the lower voice.
Surely the inner voice would be F# to G? Ben Finn 13:11, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it could probably be either way. The "double leading-tone" cadence was fairly common. —Wahoofive (talk) 04:08, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Inner voice direction
Talk:Timbuktu Manuscripts

message: Both this Reuter's article and this ABC news article suggest the manuscripts are under threat, also contains some more info to expand this page. EdwardLane (talk) 13:53, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the news today, the manuscripts have all been burnt :(  I guess most of this article will need to go into the past tense now :( --feline1 (talk) 14:07, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Manuscripts threatened by uprising? 

message: Why does this article describe the manuscripts in the past tense? It implies that there are no manuscripts left in Timbuktu, which would be a drastic and unwarranted conclusion. — ℜob C. alias ÀLAROB 19:31, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Past tense?  
Talk:Ahmet Tevfik Pasha

message: These might be PD...
https://archives.saltresearch.org/bitstream/123456789/129372/841/PFSIF9181128A225%20(1918-11-28).jpg
WhisperToMe (talk) 07:15, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images from [[Servet-i Funun]]
Talk:Damat Ferid Pasha

message: *"Damad Ferid Pasha" -Llc 1,210 results
*"Damat Ferit Pasha" -Llc 80 results
*"Damat Ferid Pasha" -Llc 31 results
Takabeg (talk) 14:47, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:Salih Hulusi Pasha

message: *"Salih Hulusi Pasha" -Llc 4
*"Hulusi Salih Pasha" -Llc 0
*"Salih Hulusi Pasa" -Llc 8
*"Hulusi Salih Pasa" -Llc ?
*"Salih Hulusi Kezrak" -Llc 8
*"Hulusi Salih Kezrak" -Llc 0
Takabeg (talk) 10:00, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Salih Hulisi
Talk:Dudley Girls High School

message: Hi there,
 Just been reading about this school over the years. I actually attended the high school myself from years 1971 and left there after taking GCE o levels in 1976. The dudley school name started in the september of 1976 for the new intake pupils. It was still the Dudley Girls High School when i left in sumer of 1976. 
 I think the info on the change over needs to be checked.
  ex pupil of 1976.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.47.107.185 (talk) 09:44, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  change from Girls High School to Dudley School
Talk:My Long Goodbye

message: "When Ted hugs the Janitor after he and Todd speak to Laverne, he says "I love you Brian", suggesting that we finally learn Janitor's name"
Deleted. Ted says 'I love you man' not 'brian' 82.45.55.120 13:29, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: yes she was, carla is imagining Lavernes spirit is following her around, and asks cox about imagaining peoples spirits, he says its silly, and nicole's character jill is seen only by cox. They wanted ben (brendan fraser) but he was busy--Jac16888 (talk) 04:01, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: In the cold open, when JD is saying how different people react to Laverne being in a coma, just before the bit with JD and Turk trying to knock down the letterbox, we see Elliot in bed with someone. Is is Keith or JD? --Pelago (talk) 14:02, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who is Elliot in bed with? 
Talk:Real part

message: Well, I wonder who decided that
* (from Real_part or simalar in Imaginary_part)
::It is denoted by \mbox{Re} \{ z \} or \Re \{ z \}
http://en.wikipedia.org/skins-1.5/common/images/button_math.png
where the second appear bigger and somehow preferred, while the more common way to refer to real part is:
* (from Imaginary_number)
::The number x\ , defined by
:::x = \operatorname{Re}(z) 
::is the real part of the complex number, z\ , and y\ , defined by
:::y = \operatorname{Im}(z) 
::is the imaginary part.
What do you think about this? A unique standard is not to be preferred? Kar.ma 13:32, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed! --pma (talk) 09:07, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Pichichi Trophy

message: There seems to be an edit war going on right now. The proper tally is 37 for Ronaldo, 31 for Messi. This is according to Marca, the paper that awards the trophy: http://www.marca.com/deporte/futbol/trofeos/2010-2011/pichichi-zamora/pichichi-primera.html. Yes, it's true that Ronaldo's official league tally is only 36. Marca controversially awarded Ronaldo a goal that deflected off of a defensive player, a goal that the league ruled to be an own goal. The controversy is worth mentioning in this article, but there is no reason to keep changing the tally back and forth. Marca awards the trophy, so Marca's tally is the only one that matters. Xcolour (talk) 03:29, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Tally

message: the correct number for goals is 41. Please see this link
http://www.marca.com/deporte/futbol/trofeos/2010-2011/pichichi-zamora/pichichi-primera.html--190.7.201.2 (talk) 22:04, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Ronaldo 2010-2011
Talk:Janie Johnson series

message: Much of the content now included in this article was derived from the articles The Face on the Milk Carton, Whatever Happened to Janie?, The Voice on the Radio, and What Janie Found. Consult the page histories of those articels for the original contributors who drafted the text recently added to this article. DES (talk) 15:03, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merged content 

message: The merge is now complete. DES (talk) 19:29, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge done

message: Will someone please make a right link for the movie and elaborate on that please? Thanks, User: ilikerad
ewh at up myu  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.134.57.79 (talk) 23:07, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Movie
Talk:Ferdinand Georg Waldmüller

message: Why does the page on Wilhelm Kaulbach redirect to here?  --Auntieruth55 (talk) 21:48, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: why redirect?

message: The second to last painting does not show "The Corpus Christi Morning" (where all of the children would join the procession), but "The First Communion Morning".--Suessmayr (talk) 14:59, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong title of a painting 
Talk:Freak folk

message: What are some characteristics of freak folk? The article lists artists associated with the genre, but that doesn't give a specific idea of what is considered "freak folk." Blackmorningsun 18:51, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: freak folk

message: Bands from the 1960s like the Holy Modal Rounders and Pearls Before Swine were using the term freak folk in their heyday --scruss (talk) 04:28, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: History?

message: Surely Freak Folk is the same genre as Nu-Folk. Perhaps these articles should be merged.
- I think this is completely wrong. am planning on contributing to re-write the categories as they are a mess.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.111.194.186 (talk) 08:47, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Nu-Folk

message: will anyone, with some relative knowledge, please, make some effort?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.54.184.177 (talk) 21:19, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is a mess 

message: Half-hearted attempt at Coining a new genre doesn't make it so.  Will someone please clean this up!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.202.67.242 (talk) 17:39, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article has bad genre references 

message: I say we merge this article with the Psychedelic Folk and give it it's own section on that page Dekai Averett (talk) 13:25, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 09:11, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Psychedelic Folk
Talk:Acquainted with the Night

message: Why does the article state that the poem is "like a sonnet"?  I believe the poem is a sonnet.  
The text of the poem is not public-domain. It was published in 1928.--Grand Slam 7 | Talk 13:55, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sonnet?

message: This is editorialising. It is true that TR is easier in Italian than it is in English, but it is not as hard as these remarks make it out to be. The supposed near-impossibility of TR in English is a myth that is entrenched in US academic tradition (I strongly suspect for the somewhat petty reason that certain scholars would like their non-TR translations of Dante to be widely acclaimed). It is also true that Frost was a master of very smooth rhyme, but the suggestion that only a herculean figure such as Frost could ever attempt TR in English is preposterous. 2A01:CB0C:CD:D800:D948:DC28:C077:7F24 (talk) 13:17, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  " terza rima is much less difficult to write in Italian than it is in English. Because of its difficulty, very few writers in English..."
Talk:LocalLink 94 (BaltimoreLink)

message: Does the long description of the attack by the youths really belong on this page?  If it's noteworty, it ought to have its own article; it certainly isn't the most important thing about this bus route.  The info at the end about similar incidents on entirely separate bus routes make its presence here particulalry hard to defend. --Jfruh (talk) 19:32, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It was in its own article at first, titled Baltimore bus beating. The article was deleted after an AFD discussion (I had proposed it for deletion following the suggestion of another), and the decision was to merge the contents into this article.Sebwite (talk) 22:18, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It just seems like the amount of information on this subject is all out of proportion to the subject of this article, which is 27 bus route in Baltimore.  If you came here, you might be given the impression that it was the most important thing about this bus line, which it honestly isn't.  --Jfruh (talk) 23:08, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I may make some changes in the writing style to this section that will de-emphasize the importance. I will have to review it. There are many other MTA-related articles that I am working on updating, and this is one of them, but I am doing them in a certain order, and it may take me some time before I reach this one.Sebwite (talk) 00:55, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

text: It is true the violent incident received nationwide attention. It received coverage for several months, and in itself is a notable incident. But the route itself, along with its predecessors, are over a century old, and there is a long history of numerous changes that led up to the current route. There have been books written and other information describing buses and streetcars covering the route. That, too, is notable. Sebwite (talk) 23:30, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

text: No, actually the AFD decision was clearly delete, period. I'm removing it on that and on undue weight basis. --Calton | Talk 15:49, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree with the removal of this section, and I have re-added it. It is properly sourced, and what was discussed during these AfDs was not that this shouldn't be included in Wikipedia, period, but that it should not be included in a standalone article. Besides, this article has plenty of other information dating back over a century, so this is not a case of undue weight. Sebwite (talk) 01:49, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Violent incident
Talk:LocalLink 56 (BaltimoreLink)

message: This article was originally "Route 35 (Baltimore)". With the rebranding and updating of city bus routes in 2017, the article was relabeled "LocalLink 56" but much of the Route 35 text had not been updated. I updated the lead paragraph.  Rather than move the "History" section to a new article about the former Route 35, I made it a section of the LocalLink 56 article.  MTA does so much rebranding and route number changes, that seemed easier than trying to create a new article. Folklore1 (talk) 18:49, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  LocalLink rebranding
Talk:CityLink Navy (BaltimoreLink)

message: This article is about the streetcar route and its bus replacement, which underwent a continuous process of changing. It doesn't make sense to split it by the date they replaced streetcars with buses (actually trackless trolleys for a while here). This article also covers the Route 2 streetcar, which was combined with Route 1 in 1959, and has a closely related history. --NE2 00:30, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:LocalLink 80 (BaltimoreLink)

message: What was the track gauge of the streetcar lines? Was it  like the Baltimore Streetcar Museum? Peter Horn User talk 01:59, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The answer is in History of MTA Maryland Peter Horn User talk 02:52, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Track gauge 

message: This can serve as a reference point/reminder as to what directions to head in for fleshing out and updating this article in regards to the notability flag that was added. I will start just by adding the presumed criteria, and will then elaborate with more notes on how to address these to the extent I am able to find time for it.
* Significant coverage from reliable sources independent of the subject - Potential sources to incorporate for coverage include newspaper articles, focus pieces in bus-related publications (Motor Coach Age in particular has quite in depth Baltimore coverage), articles written by operators/planners/etc concerning the logistics of the route (speaking as individuals rather than on behalf of the MTA), articles by current transportation reporting publications and organizations
* Reliable - The types of sources mentioned are secondary and would have received review in their publication process
* Sources are secondary and from different authors + publications - again that seems applicable to what is available to work from
* Independent of the subject - same applies
* Presumption that the availability of these sources confirms notability may not always be true if article is outside of Wikipedia scope - this is referring to things like song lyrics and nothing else or just summaries/statements of facts, etc. Avoidable as the history, function, and purpose of the route essentially require explanations and not just summaries. --Middle river exports (talk) 02:38, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Working on general notability
Talk:In Search of a Distant Voice

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement.  Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. 💵Money💵emoji💵Talk💸Help out at CCI!  12:25, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:Chinese Culture University

message: How many staff and instructors currently work for Chinese Culture University?
122.126.97.243 14:05, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

message: The Chinese Culture University is well-known to the expat community in Taiwan because it is highly visible along Jungshan North Road in section 7 of Tianmu, the section of Taipei where large numbers of foreigners live.  It is visible because it can be seen at the top of the hill.  Is that kind of information worth adding? I would have to write it a little better first, of course. Readin (talk) 00:27, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope, such sentences should not be written in Wikipedia. Chongkian (talk) 01:52, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should this be added 
Talk:Ethical relationship

message: This article requires some heavy editing to achieve some kind of balance and a degree encylopedia-ness (or whatever the word is ). We have a two-sentence lead to introduce the topic, we have a further two-sentences under the heading Basics that seems to say that relationships are central to Queer theory, then we have two whole screens of Contrasting Theories. What about a proper explanation of what an Ethical Relationship actually is? At the moment we have the un-sourced claim that people who employ the term study the relationship between mother and child, but they haven't actually said that the mother-child relationship is ethical, by definition, can be ethical, is ethical sometimes under certain circumstances, is mostly ethical most often, or what. All they said is that people who use the term ethical relationship study the mother child relationship. For example, some people who use the term Major Key study music. Does that tell you anything at all about what a mjor key is, or what music is? Clearly Not.  Some suggestions for improvement:
* Definition - an actual definition of what the term means. What are the consequences of being in an ethical relationship, how do I recognise one when I'm in it, how do I work towards achieving one, and so on.
* History - who was the first person to use the term, in what context and what did they mean by it. Have later users modified the use or meaning of the term. Have any major thinkers used the term, either to agree or disagree with the concept (whatever it might be), and if the meaning has evolved what does the term mean now?
* Examples of the benefits (if any) of being in an ethical relationship or the consequences (if any) of a relationship not being ethical.
* Read sentences with pronouns and consider whether an average reader coming to this topic anew could reasonably be expected to figure out the antecedent. Readng an encyclopedia is not meant to be as simple as reading a comic book but unprecursed pronouns are not an effective way to convey information. For example, "Thus they focus on unequal power and such matters as sexual honesty, marital, commitment, child-raising, and responsibility..." Does the pronoun they here refer to, "theories of ethics that derive from dispute resolution" or, "the meta-ethics as defined in Western moral philosophy" or, "ethical traditions emphasizing abstract moral codes" or, "ethical relationship theories"? All of these are legitimate antecedents of they in the quoted sentence. And, finally, please don't answer my question here, edit the article to improve it. Cottonshirtτ 08:17, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestions for improvement
Talk:River rapids ride

message: I hate the terminology used in this article. It should have been titled "River Rapids Ride". The industry generally refers to these attractions as such. It makes this article very difficult to locate via search. Most people are going to be searching for "rapids ride". —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jay77tx (talk • contribs).
: I'll create a redirect page for it. The correct title of this article should technically be 'River rafting ride', as capital letters needn't be used! I myself would call it a white water rapids ride... it depends where you're from, I suppose! Hawker Typhoon 14:47, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Northern General Hospital

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
Northern General Hospital England → Northern General Hospital — No longer a need to dab L.J.Skinnerwot|I did 14:35, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Add  # Support  or  # Oppose  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.  Please remember that this is not a vote; comments must include reasons to carry weight.
* Support no longer a need to dab and the Singapore Hospital was deleted.  L.J.Skinnerwot|I did 14:36, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Add any additional comments:
*The other hospital was due to open in late 2008, and is already behind schedule.  Fair enough, change it then, but this article will have the incorrect name for two years!  And that is assuming the new hospital will a) be notable and b|) carry the same name (these things often change).  L.J.Skinnerwot|I did 12:49, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
We don't need to disambiguate until a second article exists, and even then, the Sheffield hospital may remain the primary meaning. Wikipedia is not carved in stone, and we can make any changes as and when they are needed. This article has been renamed  as the result of a move request. --Stemonitis 15:09, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: :Add  # Support  or  # Oppose  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.  Please remember that this is not a vote; comments must include reasons to carry weight.
* Support no longer a need to dab and the Singapore Hospital was deleted.  L.J.Skinnerwot|I did 14:36, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: :Add any additional comments:
*The other hospital was due to open in late 2008, and is already behind schedule.  Fair enough, change it then, but this article will have the incorrect name for two years!  And that is assuming the new hospital will a) be notable and b|) carry the same name (these things often change).  L.J.Skinnerwot|I did 12:49, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.</div>
We don't need to disambiguate until a second article exists, and even then, the Sheffield hospital may remain the primary meaning. Wikipedia is not carved in stone, and we can make any changes as and when they are needed. This article has been renamed  as the result of a move request. --Stemonitis 15:09, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion