Talk:Geography of Mexico

message: North America includes Mexico, and it is not part ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhof Central America. That is a common view in the English-speaking world.
The United Nations has its own ideas. They define Mexico as part of Central America, a "subregion" of "Latin America and the Caribbean".Wait one moment.... What about tailand? Whatever. Moving on. Wikipedia needs to include the UN point of view, of course, but we are not bound by it. --Uncle Ed 20:16, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The UN geoscheme is not based in geography, because how to understand that Mexico only is 12.11% in Central America (according to some geographers), and they however include it all in Central America? Mexico being 12.11% in Central America means that the remaining 87.89% is where!? Of course in the North American region. This is an article about geography, so I think geopolitics should not play a major role. For better understanding in this issue, you can visit Talk:North America. AlexCovarrubias 07:06, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

text: be minnie mouseadded to the article. Aquzenn 22:20, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Continents and regions 

message: It’s funny how the term “Middle Americaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa” which includes a lot of countries, is only mention when it comes to Mexico, I guess we should go to all the Central American countries, the Caribbean, Colombia and Venezuela and include that they also belong to the so-called region of ”Middle America”. Supaman89
:Why not?  That would only make the articles better and more precise (careful about usage regarding Colombia and Venezuela, which are rarely included in the 'so-called' region.)  I'll get to it eventually.  Corticopia 21:29, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you mean Mesoamerica..."Middle America" is a reference to middle-class culture in the United States.Skookum1 (talk) 17:15, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Middle America??

message: Please add this :uk:Географія Мексики to the main page--Kusluj (talk) 08:51, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Iwiki

message: Information about this desertic areas in the north of Mexico is missing, this is very important
in the states of Baja California, Sonora, Chihuahua, Coahuila, and Nuevo Leon--Mario 181193 (talk) 04:12, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi. Can you please provide the information needed together with the links to their sources and then put up this edit semi-protected template again? Thanks! BejinhanTalk  04:28, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

text: Don't forget to supply full citations to reliable sources.  Aladdin Sane (talk) 04:28, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Climate in Northern Desert Areas: Baja California, Sonora, Chihuahua, Coahuila, and Nuevo Leon 

message: The section about climate lacks a picture of the Mexican desert.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tlakuache (talk • contribs) 09:19, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  This need a picture of the desert 

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 6 January 2012 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 22:50, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:BarrancaCobre.jpg Nominated for Deletion

message: I would like to know what climate experts think will happen to Mexico in particular, not just the world in general. (Since wealthy, republican, United States conservatives love to preach about personal responsibility and also tend to at first deny, and then later, minimize, global warming, i'm hoping that best of that scurvy lot will some day issue mea culpas and take some responsibility.)I'm guessing, but don't have proof, that the wealthiest of these climate change deniers are buying up land in the northern USA and Canada and getting rid of their landholdings in the southern USA and Mexico.)--Richard Peterson216.86.177.36 (talk) 00:25, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: This article does not yet have any information about climate change in Mexico, but some information is provided in Water resources management in Mexico#Potential climate change impacts. Jarble (talk) 19:37, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: The impact so far, and the future impact, of global warming on Mexico?

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Geography of Mexico. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070202190101/http://www.bartleby.com/65/co/continent.html to http://www.bartleby.com/65/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101216201229/http://travel.state.gov/travel/cis_pa_tw/cis/cis_970.html to http://travel.state.gov/travel/cis_pa_tw/cis/cis_970.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:27, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I noticed that there were no sources for this section. I looked up the first sentence on the Internet and got a match immediately from the  Federal Research Division of the Library of Congress. I believe that this is a reliable reference, but there should be some serious revamping done by rewording the article. This is direct plagiarism, and citing the source will not be enough.
To add, this information was reportedly researched within the range of 1986 and 1998. There should be an effort to update the information to more current data. Because of the time frame of the current information, any affects NAFTA had on the environmental conditions would be nice to know. Information about Mexico's recent climate change laws, their implementation, and/or current progress would be a nice addition as well. — Hbonilla2 (talk) 03:58, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Environmental conditions 

message: - links for sources 2, 3 and 4 lead to a page that is not foundMiramarble95 (talk) 07:35, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  environmental conditions section and sources 

message: When I was reading the article I encountered a link (the second one) that led to a page that was not found. When I clicked on link #5 it led me to an encyclopedia in Spanish. It may be a useful source but not for people who are not Spanish speakers. When choosing an article it should be one that the targeted audience will be able to read. In total there are a total links. The eigth one is in the middle of the webpage and after that the second half of the page goes without any citation. This makes the reader unsure if all the information comes from the same articles used or is this is all just his own opinion. Samanta1997 (talk) 01:54, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations

message: The page is very interesting, I really like how much information each section has, but the one that is bothering me is that after the first part of the article, there is barely any sources cited. We can't be for sure if the information you're using is valid because there are no sources backing up this information. I do see sources, but only in the first part of this article, but after that I don't see anymore. Overall the information is very well written, you just need to cite the sources that were used after the first part of this article.MidoriWolf07 (talk) 03:13, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer review: needs more sources 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Geography of Mexico. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070224162125/http://www.bartleby.com/am/ to http://www.bartleby.com/am/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070620130055/http://www.bartleby.com/69/71/M06671.html to http://www.bartleby.com/69/71/M06671.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:29, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hi! I'm thinking about possibly spending this semester looking more into environmental issues in Mexico and working to improve the "Environmental conditions" subheading within this article. Perhaps this isn't the best place to do it (if so, please kindly redirect me! Thank you!), but I would also like to add a little bit of information about the environmental movement in Mexico. If you would like to see a list of the sources I may potentially use, you can find it on my user page! Please let me know what you think. Cheers! Abrild72 (talk) 08:24, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improving "Environmental conditions" 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :South Mexico. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 27#South Mexico until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 13:38, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "South Mexico" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: I did not see anything inaccurate. Each fact is referenced with a link to more information. I did not find the video of the NASA flying over Earth to be helpful. In this point I find it pointless to include because it doesn't show anything for the geology. The article is neutral and provides more info on Mexico's Geology/ how it got to the point its at. To me the climate was very broad information. Just says tropical to dessert, could've had more information included on what the climate is like in the area. The links do work and there is well done paraphrasing. Only thing I would add is more climate information.
Why was the NASA fly over Mexico included?
Is the permanent crop number of 1.36% good or bad?
GeologyofMexicoMaster (talk) 18:32, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Most of the references are up to date because they are from 2011-2019, but I would like to see articles from 2020 because a lot can happen in just a year.
One of the articles I found biased was “Canadian mining doing serious environmental harm, the IACHR is told” because it already states in the title it is looking to persuade you to think people are harming the environment in caranda which isn’t even connected to Mexico.
--2601:204:EE7F:F090:2829:78C2:55F9:8F5C (talk) 18:50, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

text: Most of the references are up to date because they are from 2011-2019, but I would like to see articles from 2020 because a lot can happen in just a year.--2601:204:EE7F:F090:2829:78C2:55F9:8F5C (talk) 18:50, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  New