Template talk:Afd bottom

message: Since people regularly ignore it, can I make the "Please do not edit this page" notice, which is already bolded and italicized, bright red, font-size=500%, and blinking?  Please? —Korath (Talk) 17:24, Apr 18, 2005 (UTC)
:I just made "Please do not edit this page" bright red.  →  JarlaxleArtemis 23:56, Jun 15, 2005 (UTC)
::The red is fine! Now I wonder if we'll need to bang it up to ALL CAPS as well... Master Thief GarrettTalk 00:26, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The red is ugly (looks like a big neon sign), but I guess it's needed... --cesarb 00:41, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

message: I have updated the template in accordance with the latest nomeclature. Regards encephalon 19:49, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  VfU→DR 

message: This likely should not be used for MfD debates being closed, as  is now up and running.  --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:03, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just a note 

message: The following regular expression is used for the AFD Bot in determining whether this template has been properly  into a nomination:
:.*?above.*?discussion.*?archive.*?debate.*?</div>
Should this template have any radical changes, please make certain to alert AllyUnion as his new feature in User:AllyUnion/AFD List may break. --AllyUnion (talk) 06:31, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  AFD List notice 

message: Could someone with admin powers add this to :Category:Archival templates?  It would make sense there.  --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 22:57, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please add to a category 

message: I just fixed thetestcases page (Template:Afd bottom/testcases) so that it works and shows that the sandbox changes I just made (to top and bottom) look OK.  But this template is widely used, so I figure another pair of eyes could be good.  Most users will see no difference.  light-on-dark users should see a difference - a big improvement.  Any objections before I make the changes live?   I've made similar changes to other templates before like Template:Double underline/sandbox (made live).‎ --Elvey(t•c) 03:43, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, and I just made analogous changes to Template:Archive top and bottom and they are not editable by normal users like me.  So please take a look at those too - they actually need an admin (or template-editor's) eyes!--Elvey(t•c) 04:34, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Just noticed that the sandbox versions are out of sync example And that this is probably nog getting attention from an admin because "The edit may be made by any auto confirmed user."  Will tag Template:Archive top.--Elvey(t•c) 23:16, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

text: What change are you asking to be made here? Alakzi (talk) 08:46, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

text: Not done: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the  template. I'm not convinced that this won't break other things, and you should try to get consensus first. Any archived content that uses light text on a dark background will be made unreadable. Perhaps a better solutions would be to add a CSS class to this template that could be targeted by whatever CSS tricks you are using to get light-on-dark. Ahecht (TALKPAGE) 05:46, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fix for light-on-dark users. 

message: This page gets listed in Special:LintErrors/stripped-tag because of having </div> without the balancing  tag. Functionally this is correct since this template is paired with  which has the opening div tag. So a div tag wrapped in noincude needs to be added to remove the page off Linter report.
So add  before 
ಮಲ್ನಾಡಾಚ್ ಕೊಂಕ್ಣೊ (talk) 11:29, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: -- WOSlinker (talk) 11:47, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 13 May 2021