Talk:Civil Rights Act of 1957

message: "three years ago"? When was this written? --Tothebarricades.tk 06:50, 7 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: One user keeps reverting several other users by putting "Southern Republican Strom Thurmond" in the introduction when in reality Thurmond was a Democrat at the time.  Let's get a common sense discussion here.
Dumaka, did you notice you're the only one supporting your factually incorrect edit?  Please stop acting like you own the article, and please stick to the facts.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.12.244.13 (talk) 16:00, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It says he was a Democrat in the article so you make no sense. Dumaka (talk) 16:16, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the point is that the article mentions the fact that Thurmond eventually changed parties.  The problem with this is that it's not really relevant to the filibuster or the Civil Rights Act of 1957.  It certainly deserves examination as a part of the article on Strom Thurmond, on the Democratic Party and on the Republican Party.  I don't think that it's relevant to this article.  Without further dissent, I am going to remove the second clause of the second sentence in question on 16 February 2010 after 0:00UTC.  Sahrin (talk) 17:07, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Thurmond was a Democrat

message: As a student, was looking for information on this. I found nothing on what it did, and tons on what the next few bills down the line are. Definately needs some cleaning up.
167.93.7.32 (talk) 12:15, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Then why don't you fix it? Dumaka (talk) 17:05, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Messy much?

message: Although this article does a fine job of establishing a context for the passage and the aftermath of the Civil Rights Act of 1957, it says little to nothing about the actual contents of the Act, which is a major omission. The article needs a section by section breakdown or summary of the bill's major provisions. Are there any legislative experts out there who want to tackle this? Uncle Dick (talk) 21:33, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing Information

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Civil Rights Act of 1957. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070205051926/http://www.jfklibrary.org/Historical+Resources/Archives/Reference+Desk/Speeches/JFK/003POF03CivilRights06111963.htm to http://www.jfklibrary.org/Historical+Resources/Archives/Reference+Desk/Speeches/JFK/003POF03CivilRights06111963.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:04, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Civil Rights Act of 1957. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120107182758/http://articles.boston.com/2007-11-21/news/29228077_1_civil-rights-nichols-truman-s-executive-order to http://articles.boston.com/2007-11-21/news/29228077_1_civil-rights-nichols-truman-s-executive-order
*Added archive https://archive.is/20081024003547/http://www.civilrights.org/publications/monitor/august1988/art3p1.html to http://www.civilrights.org/publications/monitor/august1988/art3p1.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:30, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified