Talk:Microsoft Forefront Threat Management Gateway

message: Just thought the following needed noting:
"Thanks to the rich SDK, ISA Server is a very extensible platform which has many 3rd party plug-ins and extensions available for it."
-silentrancor2  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.12.220.12 (talk) 20:25, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weasel Words? 

message: I thought this article read like a pure advertising flyer from Microsoft and tried labeling it "db-spam". However an administrator disagreed. How about marking it "advert" until someone rewrites it from a neutral point of view.
TundraGreen (talk) 04:16, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Microsoft Ad 

message: The following phrase in this article looks like Microsoft puffery.  Is it really necessary?
As Microsoft's flagship security product, ISA Server is well positioned to take on the firewall/VPN market. It's interoperability with other Microsoft products provides a lower TCO for customers that already have a Microsoft infrastructure in place.
* I agree; it violates Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
Stephen Charles Thompson (talk) 04:11, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Microsoft Puffery 

message: This article reads like a corporate (kamlesh ) flyer, I am sure it's more or less accurate, but a security product from microsoft must have some issues.
: I much agree, no product is perfect. The only reason I read this page was because a friend gave me a link to details on a security hole, but I did not know what ISA was. To read about how it is such a great security product is a joke after reading that security advisory. --
**To quote an article refering to a security advisory  for a product that is well off the market (ISA 2000) is not excactly fair. If I was to publish every security advisory for Cisco/Checkpoint etc for the last 7 years thsi discussion could go on a while. That said, the article needs substantial updating.
203.214.45.143 02:20, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 

message: :Image:Network-templates large.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:16, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixificated. njan 18:37, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Network-templates large.gif

message: The article says Proxy Server v2.0 was launched in 1997, but the timeline says 1999. Riki 13:48, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction 

message: This is linked from "web cache", which only talks about caches for browsers.  I thought this was actually a reverse cache (i.e. a front end for servers), but I'm unable to determine this from the text.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ketil (talk • contribs) 09:25, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Both. Unless it's changed in the new version.218.214.18.240 (talk) 09:47, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: No change. It's both. I just kept it simple for the reader and didn't mention them. Fleet Command (talk) 17:27, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Forward cache, reverse, or both? 

message: Why no mention of this key feature?  Come to think of it, this article is pretty short and reads almost like a company white sheet in several paragraphs.  Requesting expansion!  ;)  75.70.89.124 (talk) 21:02, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  HTTPS Inspection not mentioned 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Microsoft Forefront Threat Management Gateway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/6BUgspmU1?url=http://blogs.technet.com/b/server-cloud/archive/2012/09/12/important-changes-to-forefront-product-roadmaps.aspx to http://blogs.technet.com/b/server-cloud/archive/2012/09/12/important-changes-to-forefront-product-roadmaps.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:32, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018)