Talk:The 9 Cleveland

message: This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 05:21, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating

message: I'm wondering whether someone can provide insight as to possible reasons for the effective gutting of this article over the past year.  The person doing this work is evidently local to the Cleveland, Ohio area but has neither a User page set up nor a Talk page.  I'm not looking for an argument here.  Perhaps the editor in question can provide an explanation.  I cannot, at this point, see the sense of deconstructing this page to the point of turning it back into a stub article.  NorthCoastReader (talk) 21:34, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Qære:  Can someone provide insight? 

message: This is just a casual note to see if anyone would object to moving this article to The 9 Cleveland with a redirect from Ameritrust Tower since the building has officially been re-branded (September 2014 and reflected in primary sources like www.the9cleveland.com), but more importantly a name that is being used in third-party sources like The Plain Dealer. Another option would be The 9 (Cleveland), but the former suggestion is being used regularly too, so it would eliminate the need for parenthesis. --JonRidinger (talk) 13:30, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know if that's such a good idea. "The 9" refers to the multi-building complex that includes this tower, the old Cleveland Trust rotunda, and the Swetland Building around the corner on Euclid. The rename probably would confuse matters. - Eureka Lott 14:23, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: OK. Couldn't this article be expanded to include the entire complex? There are currently no articles for either the rotunda or the Swetland Building (Swetland Building is for a building in Portland, Oregon). Considering Ameritrust Tower is no longer the name and is now even falling out of use in secondary sources, it would follow precedent of other buildings to rename the article, similar to 200 Public Square. Considering "The 9" is rather prominent on the side of the tower and on their large digital sign, I don't think it would be that confusing to use the name it's now under. --JonRidinger (talk) 15:08, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds good to me. I'd also be good with moving the material about the abandoned 1997 tower plans to the Public Square article, where it's already mentioned. It doesn't make a lot of sense to have it here. - Eureka Lott 15:22, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on The 9 Cleveland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070626050409/http://www.clevelandskyscrapers.com/cleveland/clevelandtrusttower.html to http://www.clevelandskyscrapers.com/cleveland/clevelandtrusttower.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:59, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified