lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:1983 in film

message: Shouldn't WarGames and Octopussy have their studio listed as United Artists. This is due to the fact that when Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer purchased United Artists they did in fact start a company called MGM/UA Entertainment Company (or Distribution Company) but some films would get released under the United Artists brand and others under the Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer brand. What I'm trying to say is MGM/UA should be changed to United Artists for the above mentioned films as MGM/UA was merely the owner of United Artists so by that logic when Transamerica Corporation owned United Arists it should say (on the table for the highest-grossing films) Transamerica/United Artists instead of United Artists.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.102.157.194 (talk) 02:57, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: MGM/UA ?
Talk:1984 in film

message: Removed this from events:
*November 26 - Filming starts on Back to the Future.
which just seems to be worthless trivia. It's one thing if something happened on the set (ie, Twilight Zone deaths) but just to state filming has begun seems way too "fan-boy" esque.
This is also seems less then encyclopedia worthy:
* Actress Sharon Stone marries Michael Greenburg
Also, removed all the exposition from the list, most of which was already stated in the lists of awards above it. It is supposed to be a list of films, if someone wants to know who directed it, etc they can follow the link QED. RoyBatty42 01:19, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Didn't Devil Fish (Shark: Rosso nell'oceano) come out in this year? Calmsavior 01:29, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Devil Fish 

message: Avril Lavigne was born on the 27th of September 1984, and has been in films, can she count in births?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.143.52.211 (talk) 23:36, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Avril Lavigne 

message: What is this section? -- Jeandré (talk), 2009-07-20t20:33z
:Deleted. No one's explained what it's supposed to be, it doesn't seem to appear on other "... in film" pages, and it doesn't seem to have any purpose other than listing three actors. Optimus Sledge (talk) 12:24, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Comedy short film series

message: There is a big error in the table. It lists "Romancing the Stone" as the fourth highest grossing film that year and states the figure as $148,168,459. However on the "Gremlins" page it states that "Gremlins" was the fourth highest grossing film that year and states the exact same figure. On the "Romancing the Stone" page it states an entirely different number as the gross of that film. This is a clear error the requires fixing, but I don't have an account and don't want to make one.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.214.107.235 (talk) 00:35, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Highest grossing films 

message: Film Director Joseph Losey died on June 22 1985. 
A definite absence in the 'Notable Deaths' section. 
See here for more details:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Losey  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.86.231.96 (talk) 15:53, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable Deaths - Add Joseph Losey 

message: Ghostbusters surpassed Beverly Hills Cop as number 1 highest grossing film from 1984 after it's films re-release the following year.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.237.34.211 (talk) 13:04, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number 1 Highest Grossing Film 

message: The Terminator's gross that is shown is its international one, domesticaly, it only made around 38 million, far from being placed in the top 10. This list needs revision.
http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=terminator.htm
--85.247.117.181 (talk) 09:28, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terminator? 

message: There is plenty of animated feature films in 1984.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.97.188.82 (talk) 13:54, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Animated feature films
Talk:1988 in film

message: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rambo_3
this is second  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.0.168.187 (talk) 06:22, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Would like to add the film "Casual Sex?" starring Lea Thompson and Victoria Jackson to the list of 1988 movies as it is currently missing. Thanks.
Roswell1965 (talk) 08:00, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: This page is no longer protected. Subject to consensus, you should be able to edit it yourself. Jackmcbarn (talk) 16:19, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 15 January 2014
Talk:1990s in film

message: this statement does not make sense and is not referenced   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.27.216.24 (talk) 16:24, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: "Bollywood gained popularity worldwide, apart from India"

message: As I've been tapping through some of these links, I've noticed that sometimes it's the page for book on which the film is based, rather than the page for the film itself that shows up. Which is preferred? 
Given that it's 1990s in film I suggest that it should be the page for the film that is linked. However, I don't want to start going through homologising the links only for the community to disagree on that point.
--Froginvestor (talk) 07:10, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to Films or Books? 

message: I have this question regarding articles like this one. Do we really need lists like the one in this particular article? It is bulky and it is almost of no use other than to find out which '90s films start with the letter A, or B, or C, etc. For me, the lists are provided and detailed well enough in the individual years in films that they only need to be linked in this article to provide readers an opportunity to check out the individual films of the decade.
LionFosset (talk) 04:09, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "List of films" or "List of years in film" for an article about a decade in film?
Talk:1993 in film

message: The Lion King is a 1993 American animated feature film produced by Walt Disney Feature Animation and released by Walt Disney Pictures, It's the thirty-second animated feature in the Walt Disney Animated Classics, this film was directed by Rob Minkoff & Roger Allers creative team directors have originally been working on Hercules (1997).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.147.198.171 (talk) 05:19, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Lion King (1993) 

message: Does Buford's Beach Bunnies belong on this list? --evrik (talk) 18:43, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Buford's Beach Bunnies

message: If somebody can check that out, the movie Sniper has its entire column broken it seems. Somebody please fix this as I can't figure out how to.
SPNKs (talk) 04:28, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: January-March Table error
Talk:1996 in film

message: ===January-March===
*January 1996
*February 1996
*March 1996
===April-June===
*April 1996
*May 1996
*June 1996
===July-September===
*July 1996
*August 1996
*September 1996
===October-December===
*October 1996
*November 1996
*December 1996
Hoverfish 17:05, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Wide-release movies

message: *October 1996
*November 1996
*December 1996
Hoverfish 17:05, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: October-December

message: I noticed that Happy Gilmore came out in 1996, but it isn't in the list.  I added it to the list of movies, but I don't know whether it was one of the top grossing movies.  I would guess it was.  Could somebody check to see, and possible add it to the list?  Tracer Bullet 06:55, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Happy Gilmore? 

message: Both of these were released in 1995 and both are featured on the 1995 list. I tried to remove them but I then messed up the colors and the dates of other films on the list. Please help me! Calle Widmann (talk) 02:58, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  12 Monkeys and Dead Man Walking
Talk:1997 in film

message: Again, like in 1995, if this section is to be worked to include films, here it is...Hoverfish 17:21, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This film was originally release in 1989, but this film was re-issued in 1997.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.147.198.171 (talk) 19:20, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Little Mermaid (1997 film)
Talk:1998 in film

message: Same as last year, here is the code if needed. Hoverfish 17:53, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've noticed that Rush Hour has been omitted from the top grossing films, despite the fact that its own article states it placed 7th highest in the United States.--Name Theft Victim 13:27, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rush Hour 

message: That was a movie made in 1998 i watched it on the cw late late movie.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.250.156.10 (talk) 10:08, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Honeymoon

message: Could you want to change the Wide release movies section to a new one that looks like the one from 1997 in film?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:0:8500:472:4CD0:84B7:5892:CB01 (talk) 10:39, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reflect
Talk:1999 in film

message: In 15 April 2006, unsigned user 205.188.117.73 has introduced this section, but since then it has been left unfinished and points only to general dates. I place it here, in case he plans to develop it further. Hoverfish 18:48, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: After the success of Pocahontas, Tarzan, and The Little Mermaid, here are 4 DisneyToon Studios movies:
*1. Belle's Magical World is released on Video on February 9, 1999
*2. Hercules is released in theatres on June 25, 1999 and re-released in theatres on November 19, 1999
*3. Pocahontas: Journey to a New World is released on Video on August 24, 1999
*4. Mickey's Once Upon a Christmas is released on Video on November 9, 1999
Note: Hercules is the #3 animated film of all-time produced by DisneyToon Studios and released in theatres twice in 1999, once in June and once in November.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:3D09:757B:A600:71B4:41E4:FADC:DA9B (talk) 16:50, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  1999 DisneyToon Studios Movies 

message: Am I misreading the sources for the top 10 or is there not a discrepancy? The Numbers source has the list that’s featured on the page, but Box Office Mojo has different rankings. For example, Austin Powers is not in the top 10 on BOM. Rusted AutoParts 14:31, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Neither is The Mummy. The Box Office Mojo chart is wrong. As you can see at the BOM entry for The Mummy, it grossed $416 million (virtually identical to the figure at The Numbers), but doesn't show up in the chart. These errors have been popping up in Box Office Mojo for 3/4 years now. The issue is documented at WP:BOXOFFICE#Box Office Mojo. In my opinion it should be deprecated as a reliable source, but the problem is The Numbers isn't that great either which would create a data gap. Usually the errors can be ironed out by comparing the two, but it's not great for verification purposes, as you have just discovered for yourself. Betty Logan (talk) 14:40, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Highest grossing list
Talk:2001 in film

message: i just want to know 125.26.55.134 (talk) 04:53, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why 2001 don't have Boxoffice ? 

message: I'm experimenting with this format.  I've created two separate tables, one for US and one for worldwide grosses.  Putting them into one table doesn't work, as the top ten US don't match the top ten worldwide Redjacket3827 (talk) 17:17, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Top Grossing Movies
Talk:Ensure

message: Can someone make this page longer? Torax's Rage 00:23, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Length

message: Should there be a direct link to the manufactures website on the disambiguate page? Shouldn't this be a link to the wikipedia article on the product instead? Ochbad (talk) 05:04, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to manufactures website.  

message: According to the manufacturers web site it's a drink AKA a shake.  They don't say anything about force feeding being the "intended use".
This needs cleaning up. 99.11.160.111 (talk) 06:48, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Absolutely. Upon reading this page, I was a bit disturbed that the majority of this stub article focuses on force-feeding of this product. Any information about force-feeding practises should be moved to articles relating to specific incidents or practises, rather than mentioning it in this article. It's no fault of the manufacturer that certain entities use their product in malicious ways. TheFrozenFire (talk) 07:50, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: So is there a consensus to remove the references to force-feeding? --Yaush (talk) 19:31, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: no 172.58.22.229 (talk) 04:46, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

text: It's commonly ingested through nasogastric tubes by patients with anorexia. --Chickenflicker (talk) 14:44, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  meant to be fed through a nose tube ?? 

message: This product is available in both powder and liquid form.  The directions on a bottle of Ensure are:  Shake well.  Serve cold.  It does not mention administering.
The powder may be mixed either with milk or water.
Medical and dental professionals may recommend this product following extensive medical or dental procedures to maintain proper nutrition during the patient's recovery.
Respectfully,   Tiyang (talk) 17:16, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: http://abbottnutrition.com/Products/ensure says, "For oral use." Hyacinth (talk) 00:23, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thoughts, ideas and information 

message: I saw a link to "Milkshake" in the "See also" section. It looked weird to me, so I removed it, although I added Infant formula, which sounds quite related to the subject of this page.
 reverted it and said that it's not infant formula. That's correct—Ensure is indeed not infant formula, but it's certainly not quite a milkshake either.
If everybody thinks that infant formula is unrelated, then I guess that the whole "See also" section can be removed, but "Milkshake" definitely seems out of place. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 11:33, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Milkshake?
Talk:Lists of Chinese films

message: I see there are alot of people working on these 2 lists.  If you guys are willing to merge the two list together, I can make an effort to plug info available from the Hong Kong Film Archive.  That would fill alot of gaps and overlaps between 1913 to 2003.  See link here.  What that list is still missing is alot of mainland films.  For example Purple Butterfly was not on the list.  Let me know what you guys think.  Maybe we can have a region column, with PRC/HK.  Is there a mainland downloadable movie pdf somewhere?  Benjwong 01:31, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Combining List of Hong Kong films & Chinese films
Talk:Suspension (punishment)

message: Please see Article 13 on the following page: http://www.geocities.com/usw_local_6520/cba.html
I did not this reference in the article itself, because I am a member of that union and last time somebody bellyached that if I included a link to the website of my own local, this would be seen as self-promotion... Anyway, for any doubting Thomases, companies do at times suspend people as a means of punishment. Click on the link and you will see chapter and verse. Achim 00:31, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference to the use of suspensions as a form of discipline

message: Should Suspension, referring to the school punishment, be it's own page?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by KeeganWelch (talk • contribs) 15:28, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seperate Page
Talk:World soul

message: This should be its' own separate enrty for multiple reasons:
*The concept of the Worldsoul is universal, not just related to Hinduism
*The Greek philosopher Plotinus specifically mentions the World Soul in his writings.
*The transcedentalist poet Ralph Waldo Emerson discusses an extremely similar concept in his poem of 'Oversoul'.
*If anything, the concept of the World Soul is more closely related to the hindu concept of Paramatman, and should be linked to that page, though as mentioned, because of its cross-cultural presence it should have its own page.
Solace098 00:35, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Louis Armstrong and His Hot Five

message: Some good additions to this article, but I have to question the assertion that the second version of the Hot 5 "found Armstrong playing with musicians more nearly his equal". Certainly Hines was much a more sophisticated musician than Lil Hardin Armstrong, and seems to have helped inspire Armstrong to stretch his limits more than anyone Armstrong shared the recording studio with since Bechet. The rest of the second Hot 5, however, seem IMO more like supporting sidemen rather than artistic collaborators. Dodds and Ory are still regarded as influential innovators and continue to be emulated today; by contrast I'm unaware of there being any such things as a Fred Robinson influenced school of trombone style, or contemporary clarinetists who long to sound like Jimmy Strong. -- Infrogmation (talk) 04:55, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Shepherd of the Hills (novel)

message: Removed a spam link embedded as a footnote at the end of the article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.238.249.153 (talk) 20:45, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

message: I ran across two viewmaster 3D reels of Shepherd of the Hills but it is unclear whether the pictures were taken from the movie that John Wayne starred in, or whether they were pictures taken from any of the many plays by the same name.  Are these worth anything?  I only paid one dollar in June of 2004 (at a rate of fifty cents per reel), and felt the purchase was quite a bargain, especially as the pictures were so old.198.177.27.30 11:30, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If the John Wayne movie were shot stereopically for viewing with anaglyphic glasses, it is possible the viewmaster reel were a promotional item as stereo photography is only a hop and a skip removed from anaglyphic pictures. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 198.177.27.30 (talk) 10:42, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "Shepherd of the Hills" 3D Viewmaster reel
Talk:Punched card sorter

message: Sorting least significant column first, then next, ... is a radix sort.  Bin sorting is sorting the most significant column first, then the next most significant for each bin (you have to keep the bins separate), then ....  See the description of Postman's sort in the Bin Sort article for a description of radix sorting, also look at the radix sort article.  Thanks.  69.106.232.37 00:45, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: radix or bin sort?

message: I'm inclined to rename this article IBM punched card sorters because it really covers all of them. Any objections?--agr (talk) 00:42, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Change name

message: A new 084 sorter was installed at Pacific Northwest Bell in Seattle on May 1, 1963, so I suspect that 1963 may have been the year that the 084 was introduced.  Sorting punched cards that represented toll calls was a large project each day. The 084 greatly helped the process. GQuickstad (talk) 17:16, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Pacific Northwest Bell
Talk:The Moves Make the Man

message: Moves Make the Man rulez!
I read this book shortly after it came out...I think I was about 12.  I loved this book.  I'm going to get it and re-read it...and then maybe I'll expand this article.  We'll see.
Jaylectricity 00:16, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Dublin Minor Football Championship

message: How about changing the Roll of Honour infobox, to a three section, A, B and C, stating the winner of each one? so, the confusion over A, B and C can be avoided and all the relevant minor information will be made available? Frainc 16:18 October 25 2006.
Heres an example?
Year	Winner A	Winner B	Winner C
2006	Cuala   	        	
I'd add in the other info, but cant access Hill16 website at mo, must be prob with the server! Frainc 16:26 October 25 2006.
:That looks class, the only problem and its minor is if we ever decide to createDublin Minor Club Football Championship B or Dublin Minor Club Football Championship C it will take longer (not much ) to copy the results over than 3 seperate tables   (Gnevin 19:32, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I added the    to shortern the table if you dont like feel free to rv (Gnevin 21:11, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: ABC

message: Maybe move too Dublin Minor Club Football Championship  as it covers a,b and c ? (Gnevin 19:32, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Move
Talk:Norman W. Walker

message: the Walker Wikipedia page are not in evidence & in my opinion should be removed,
This would include the French farmhouse carrot-cutting story.
And would also include the "fact" that Walker was in excellent health mentally & physically at his death.  Except for his book publisher's claim via a published "eulogy" (& he could definitely have a bias), there currently exists no official evidence (death cert. or coroner's report) in the public domain that proves this allegation was true.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.54.97.186 (talk) 17:52, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some of the "facts" in... 

message: A comment on notability: Norman Walker's page needs work, it is true. But why is his notability in question? He advocated the juicing of raw vegetables in the 1930s! Is it seriously suggested that in 1936 he was recycling old ideas with no individuality or impact of his own? I'd like to know more about him, not less (including proper scrutiny). Timray (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 18:50, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I would also thing that notability is granted... he published several books. And yes, the article could need a lot of work Iridos (talk) 11:21, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Norman Walker and his original "Norwalk" juicer are given a prominent place in the promotional film on the Gerson Institute, The Gerson Miracle, for link to which, see Max Gerson. In this 2004 film, then 81 year-old Charlotte Gerson (who is now 88) says she is completely healthy due to the Gerson diet (which strangely doesn't include all that calf's liver), states that her father died of arsenic poisoning (we are left with the implication that he'd still be going, if not) and that the father of juicing Norman Walker (prominently mentioned along with his original juicer, and footage of it working) lived to be 117. That's what Wikipedia is for: we can look up Walker and find that he made it to 99 years 6 months, which is a pretty good run, but far short of the 117 which would be world-record for a man (see supercentenarian-- the oldest verified man ever, did not reach 116). This guy is the father of the Jack LaLanne diet stuff and has heavily influenced food faddists. He is certainly notable. SBHarris 22:36, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability