lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Miles Franklin

message: There are lot of unsubstantiated claims in this article, some verging on opinion and subjectivity. It needs more work. Sterry2607 09:26, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sourcing 

message: I will be replacing the section Life and Career. I will be writing adding some background information on Miles Franklin's novel My Brilliant Career. The things that I will be focusing on are when did she write it, How old was she, and How long it take for her to write it. 
Sunflower 123Sunflower 123 (talk) 20:10, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outline of " My Brilliant Career" 

message: 1)Erskine, Thomas L. "Miles Franklin." Magill’S Survey Of World Literature, Revised Edition (2009): 1-5. Literary Reference Center. Web. 15 July 2016.
2) Sheridan, Susan. "My Brilliant Career: The Career Of The Career." Australian Literary Studies 20.4 (2002): 330. MasterFILE Elite. Web. 14 July 2016.
3)webby, Elizabeth. "Reading My Brilliant Career." Australian Literary Studies 20.4 (2002): 350. MasterFILE Elite. Web. 14 July 2016.
Sunflower123Sunflower 123 (talk) 20:13, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Those will need to be in the article, not here on the talk page. Also use caution when removing other sources, or content supported by those sources. You may find Help:Referencing for beginners helpful. Please stick to a neutral point of view and write in a formal tone as well, thanks. Grayfell (talk) 22:03, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  sources for "My Brilliant Career" 

message: Miles Franklin is part of the category :Category:Australian fascists. This was news to me, and I can't see it discussed in the article. I have removed this category for now. I'm assuming it was vandalism? - Chris.sherlock (talk) 21:55, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems to have happened here. But I have looked at some sources and this might actually be something this article needs to explore, in particular I found this source. - Chris.sherlock (talk) 00:18, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  fascism?
Talk:Government agencies in Sweden

message: Integrationskommittén comes to mind. No one heard of it, yet it existed until today when is was dissmantled by the new minister of immigration. Lord Metroid 12:13, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Agencies missing

message: Let's chart the expenditures that the different aganecies make use of. I imagine a tree like structure where one can see first how much money each agency get and then how that agency make use of the available money. Lord Metroid 17:14, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Great Idea

message: A discussion elsewhere (at what is now Talk:Swedish Ombudsman against Discrimination on Grounds of Sexual Orientation) has led me to the conclusion that the title of this page ought to be Government agencies in Sweden, without capitalization, since the title isn't a proper noun in itself. This would bring the name of the article in line with the name of List of United States federal agencies and :Category:Swedish government agencies. 
(The names of the respective agencies, however, are proper nouns and should be capitalized just the way they are in the article.) Alarm 23:29, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Done — in cooperation! :-) --Johan Magnus 04:23, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Capitalization in the page name
Talk:List of high schools in Pennsylvania

message: On 2 Feb 2005, this article was nominated for deletion.  See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/High schools in Pennsylvania for a record of the discussion.
Based on that discussion, future editors are requested to:
# Move it to the correct List of high schools in X form
# Add a header to the article cautioning future editors that Wikipedia is not a repository of links and Wikipedia is not a directory
# send to Cleanup because it simply does not contain enough data to meet the purpose of lists.
Rossami (talk) 23:30, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: From VfD
Talk:Terracotta Army

message: The Chinese terra cotta army is predated by the Cypriot terra cotta figures by 300-400 years. Did Cypriot culture at the time influence Chinese funeral rites or was there a third culture that influenced both? 2605:B100:122:DC9D:C828:D1BF:4B42:98ED (talk) 22:26, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  We're they influenced by Cypriot culture?
Talk:Boeing C-108 Flying Fortress

message: This article received the inaugural WikiWings award in January 2005 --Rlandmann 23:51, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:   

message: I'm just curious why someone linked to the article on the number 108? That seems irrelevant to the aircraft.--Coryma "Go brain go." 21:19, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  number? 
Talk:Vissarion Jughashvili

message: Should this person be on Wikipedia? We have almost no info on him, and he has no personal claim to fame. --SqueakBox 23:57, Feb 16, 2005 (UTC)
He's the presumed father of one of the twentieth century's most influential people and therefore interesting in as far as he may have had some bearing on Stalin's life. Seems notable enough for me. Lisiate 01:11, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: I have removed this article from the categories "1850 births" and "1890 deaths".  This is speculation as it is not known exaclty when he was born and died.--Fox Mccloud 19:19, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth and Death 

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Jreferee (Talk) 08:30, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment
Talk:Loamhedge

message: :Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
*Support, slightly better naming options. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 10:26, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Bayazid Bastami

message: The Qur'an quote in this section is shorter in Arabic, as it lacks the "Wala tahsabanna allatheena qutiloo fee" and
starts from "sabeeli..." Maybe extend the Arabic or remove it altogether? 94.237.127.43 (talk) 20:09, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: The Mystery About Shrine of Bayazid Bostami in Bangladesh

message: Is this about the saint or his shrine? If the former, it's not a geo-stub, and shouldn't start with details about his shrine. If the latter, then it shouldn't be in the Iran category (since the shrine's in India), and should be renamed to reflect what it's really about!  Grutness|hello?  00:26, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The shrine is in Chittagong,Bangladesh. I think the article refers to the saint, and needs rewriting to reflect that. --Ragib 02:22, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: Bayazid was refered to as a Sufi Gnostic , I think by gnostic , actualy Aref , the Arabic word meaning one who has achieved direct mystical knowledge or gnosis was meant.But since Gnostic refers to a mystic tradition tied with Christiany i.e Gnosticism whith which Bayazid certainly had no relation , I found it confusing and removed it.Pasha Abd 04:46, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  A comment on removing the word gnostic 

message: I am going to change the first sentence ending with "born in Bostam (...)" to "born in Bastam (known in the past as Bostam)". The reason? Dehkhoda says so. So after waiting a bit, I will change it unless a valid reference on possible use of Bostam in the present day is given.--خنیاگر (talk) 05:01, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I support your change.  It seems Bastam is the correct translation.  In actually the word derives from the Pahlavi Vistam.--Nepaheshgar (talk) 05:13, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I change it and removed Bostam completely. The article is not about the city and as I said and others as well in the above discussion the city is know as Bastam. --خنیاگر (talk) 05:41, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bostam??? 

message: There is a famous story in Bangladesh about Bayezid Bostami is that he was one night ordered by his ailing mother to bring a glass of water, which he couldn't find. So, he went to fetch water from a fountain and when he returned, he saw her asleep. So, he carried the jar of water all night, standing by her. In the morning, when she woke up, she was surprised and she blessed him.
Is the story valid? Where is the source, if anyone could provide me? Also, is it notable enough to be added in the article? Cheers. --Ifteebd10 (talk) 23:05, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bayezid Bostami and his mother
Talk:Arrifes

message: Some published descriptions pay little attention to the interior structures. We have to look for photos of the interior to discover aisles, and we have to examine satellite photos for the withs of the nave in relation to the chancel/main chapel/capela mor.--Ulamm (talk) 23:09, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Churches
Talk:List of airports in Japan

message: Is the terminology "First Class" (etc.) an official Japanese government wording, or can we rename these "Class 1" (etc.)?
The official terminology is dai I shu, dai II shu and dai III shu (第一種、第二種、第三種 lit. the first kind, the second kind and the third kind). The post-war Japanese beaureaucrats are trained to avoid offence.
However, current wording First Class, etc. suggesting hierarchy is less confusing. Usually First Class airports are the busier. I feel this wording should be kept.
it was commonplace to find a note in the listing for Tokyo airports that haneda did handle international flights to finesse between the two Chinas. It would be nice to see that detail set out here by someone who knew it accurately!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.194.19.80 (talk) 08:37, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This list would be much more handy if it would include passenger data and or number of flights. Does anybody have a good source for this? --Mkill (talk) 07:50, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  number of flights / passenger data 

message: Would help in sorting the airport size by listing # of runways and length of longest.  Typically anything less then 3499 ft is for GA, while longer is commercial and corporate.  Flightsoffancy (talk) 17:58, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Runways and longest length at each airport 
Talk:The Tale of the Heike

message: As far as I am aware, it is an anonymous work, an epic and classical piece not unlike Beowulf, the Bible, or the Odyssey & Iliad (many believe that Homer was a pseudonym, or even a group of people, not a single individual). Much like, to take an example, the fairy tales of the Brothers Grimm, the Tale of the Heike was passed down orally through many generations before it was set down into a permanent written/painted form. So, even if we did know who wrote it the first time - and this may or may not be known, I'm not sure - it barely even matters. Whoever it was simply wrote down what he heard or knew, the story that had been passed down for hundreds of years.
LordAmeth 03:34, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your hard work. I have cleaned up your language a bit; I hope I have not changed the meaning too much. Keep up the good work! LordAmeth (talk) 00:24, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Really thanks for checking it! Yes, it's ok now :-) ( as you can see, I've registered myself.) If you want me to keep improving this, just say it, I have plenty material about this :-)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brisk 90 (talk • contribs) 14:12, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Author? 

message: I've noticed that there is a recent translation by Royall Tyler which is not cited in the article but which I thought might deserve mention.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chriscr30 (talk • contribs) 23:21, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tyler Translation 

message: 征夷大将軍は"barbarian-subduing commander"ではないと思います。
奈良時代に異民族（蝦夷）を討伐する将軍につけられましたが、平家物語の時代には、征夷大将軍は東の敵を倒す将軍といってよい意味になっています。
（本来、源頼朝は征東大将軍になるはずだったが、征東大将軍木曽義仲が処刑されたばかりだったので凶（運が悪い）と思われ、征夷大将軍になった。） 狐月狼陽 (talk) 03:20, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chapter8(barbarian-subduing commander)
Talk:Procida

message: Hi. Great article. I thought I'd edit the English usage - it was full of errors and flaws in usage. Plus far too many Americanisms. Best, Iamlondon 21:29, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Language edits
Talk:Muine

message: I would say it meets notability requirements. It is in installable via Debian, Ubuntu, Suse, Fedora, Gentoo repositories. A google search for muine music GNOME turns up 107,000 hits. I don't see how it is different than the many other http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Multimedia_software_stubs for lack of sources, etc. -ChristopherM 02:32, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 
Talk:Chant

message: Jews and Samaritans chant.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.38.211.144 (talk) 19:20, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Not Menetion

message: I removed the following:
*"Chants are a special case of rhytmic recursive repetitions reflected off symmetrical or reverse syllabic reverbations of verbiage of levels of symbolic abstrrrraction and contraction action off hope or divination, if I recall correctly reverse rhyme of their verse! The previous sentence is a chant in essence. Agquarx 23:42, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed

message: I'm skeptical.  Can someone cite evidence for this?  There was always song wile there was chant, and the earlier documented forms of European song, like the troubadour canso and the Latin cantio, didn't follow the modal system of Gregorian chant.  Tropes, organa, liturgical drama, even motets "evolved" from chant, but not song. Peirigill 00:34, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Song evolving from chant?

message: Gouranga UK, please state your worry before reverting changes to the article. Have put them back for the time being. Knowledge for All 22:56, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed the statement "Chanting the Name of God is a spiritual practice that is commonly recommended by spiritually evolved souls in the current era." because I don't think it is a verifiable fact. (Even if you or I may agree with it or not) - It reads more like a personal point of view. The other change I've made is that the introductory paragraph shouldn't have a title - the article Chant is the title in this instance. I hope you can see the reasoning behind these two changes. That was why I had reverted before. Best Wishes, GourangaUK 15:31, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: State worry about POV

message: May I suggest that a section about historical origins should be added.
I expect that the chanting tradition is extremely old and it probably appeared independently in many parts of the world. By the way, the article lacks references to more ancient examples of chanting, where Germanic paganism (see here) is only one example. (Anders Hallström) 165.1.243.180 (talk) 12:25, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origins
Talk:Usog

message: The notion of "Evil Eye" has been around for a very long time. It is possible that the Spanish took it to the Philippines; but it is also possible that the notion of the "Evil Eye" existed in the Philippines before the Spanish arrived.  
We know that the notion of the Evil Eye existed around the Mediterranean coast, the Middle East, around the Silk road for a very long time. The Evil Eye could be very useful in tracing the cultural interaction across the globe in  prehistoric times. Let's not jump to conclusion that Evil Eye was brought to the Philippines by the Spanish in the recent past without concrete evidence. You know the old school Orientalism: "the Westerners taught everything to the Orientals" including the superstitions. Let's not succumb to it. AverageTurkishJoe (talk) 05:25, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explaining away the Evil Eye as a relic of Spanish colonization 

message: The article doesn't need to start with the cruft about other meanings of "balis" because it isn't the  anyway. Balis should be a disambiguation page, partially pointing towards this article. (Vanilla Google suggests that there is a primary topicsome kind of drinkbut it's pretty ratty these days and can't be trusted to show the actual relative weight of anything touching commercial issues.) — LlywelynII 17:11, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Balis
Talk:Jason Kottke

message: Some blogger. Writes mostly on NYC; Claims designed a font; Some tech stuff ripped off from sites like Endgadget, slashdot etc. I'm from country side Pennsylvania and like most Wikipedia readers, I believe this isn't worth mentioning here. Let's do VfD poll again. VfD polls should be conducted every three months atleast.
:The result will be the same. When it comes to blogging, Jason Kottke is one of the most well known out there. This wikipedia article is a well-written, encyclopedic entry. There's no reason to delete it. And please, sign comments using the standard method. ElfWord 00:54, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  VfD...with a fresher audience.  

message: Compare this entry with that of Tareq Salahi of the famous White House dinner crashing incident. Most of the excuses offered for this article to be 'Kept'  (such as large number of Google Hits, Coverage by Newsweek etc) is not accepted in that entry's talk page. 
How does this entry still remain in Wikipedia?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dministrator (talk • contribs) 01:13, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question re- Deletion 
Talk:Rufus Putnam

message: I've significantly expanded on this article.  I don't know if this is legimate format or not, since its my first article.  If you could help, I'd greatly appreciate it.  Thanks.  Last Pantagruelist 02:49, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misc comment 

message: The article was initially arranged in the following order:
Revolutionary War
Early Life and Career
Post-War Activities
I found this an odd arrangement, since most Wikipedia biographical articles follow a chronological format.  I just cut and pasted the Revolutionary War section and placed it between the other two.
I know that the author may have wished to emphasize the subjects contributions to the Revolutionary War as the most important aspect of his life, but this arrangement was strange.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ber06122 (talk • contribs) 13:53, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rearranged order of presentation
Talk:Isotretinoin

message: Why are these sources I added removed? From MHRA at the UK government, and controlled studies. The findings are also consistent with other studies that show the same thing. If I also add the other studies showing the same thing, would you then please not remove them, @Kimen8 , but thanks for the edits of grammar. 
24.	"Review of isotretinoin and psychiatric adverse reactions" (PDF). Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). www.gov.uk. November 2014. Retrieved 2 April 2024.
26.	Alamri A, Khafaji R, Balkhy A, Samarkandy S, Alraddadi A (December 2023). "The Psychological Impact of Isotretinoin Therapy on Acne Vulgaris Patients". Cureus. 15 (12): e50612. doi:10.7759/cureus.50612. PMC 10724700. PMID 38107219.
30.	Saraç G, Koca TT, Şener S, Hakverdi G (15 March 2018). "Effect of 6-Month Isotretinoin Treatment on 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Levels in Patients With Acne Vulgaris". Journal of Clinical Medicine of Kazakhstan. 1 (47): 25–28. doi:10.23950/1812-2892-JCMK-00537. ISSN 1812-2892.
31.	Gökalp H, Bulur I, Gürer M (2014). "Decreased vitamin B 12 and folic acid concentrations in acne patients after isotretinoin therapy: A controlled study". Indian Journal of Dermatology. 59 (6): 630. doi:10.4103/0019-5154.143533. ISSN 0019-5154. PMC 4248518. PMID 25484410. Tomsiti (talk) 13:02, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Based on WP:MEDRS, I removed what I thought were WP:PRIMARY sources, including trials/intervention studies. Controlled studies are not to be used as a reference for your insertion, unless you happen to be saying that there exists such a study, perhaps to say that research on some topic is ongoing (i.e., do not use its results conclusively). Favor WP:SECONDARY sources, such literature reviews, meta-analyses, and the like. If you believe any of those do fit WP:MEDRS you are free to put them back. If you add good sources, of course I will not remove them (unless I do so by accident, in which case just WP:AGF and revert or let me know). Kimen8 (talk) 16:07, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why are these sources removed?
Talk:Chinese linking rings

message: I'm removing the scrolling to the Magician's Oath and further scrolling to details about magic tricks.  In my opinion, there is not enough information here for someone to actually learn how to do the trick, and knowing the psychological principles behind an illusion does not necessarily spoil a performance, since a good performer should be able to cause the audience to suspend belief, and surprise the audience with what happens next. It is actually more surprising when someone thinks they know how it's done, and the magician invents a new technique that appears to contradict it. GUllman 04:30, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Please take a look at Talk:Out of This World (card trick)#Request for comment. Bovlb 2005-07-06 04:42:41 (UTC)
Get rid of theses sections exposure is bad??!?!??!?!?!??!?!
:An encyclopedia's job is to inform, not to keep secrets. The spoiler warnings are more than sufficient. Hiding magic secrets is as unencyclopedic as hiding Scientology secrets or using censorship. As soon as we start being cowed by interest groups in what we will or won't include in our encyclopedia, Wikipedia immediately loses all credibility. -Silence 18:20, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for comment 

message: I've been wondering if the illusion could be preserved without a key ring. Hackwrench 16:07, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  No key ring? 

message: I noticed that the link of this page to the Chinese and Japanese pages is not quite right. This is a page about a magic trick, but the Chinese and Japanese articles linked here are about a ancient puzzle that involves some (usually nine) metal rings and taking them all out of a metal bar which they are chained to. Although both these articles are about rings and both are of Chinese origin, they are not the same! Please de-link those pages from here, so as to not confuse people. I'm not sure what are the correct articles they should link to, but it's definitely not this one.
Hikari no sakura 12:58, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, you're true. They are talking about entirely different things. I'll remove the cross language links. AbelCheung (talk) 21:30, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong Links to Other Language Wikis 

message: The 'method' was not only badly written and confusing, but also made erroneous assumptions, speculation and was full of original research (OO and C rings, indeed!). I've removed repetitions and overly complex explanations that serve no one. If Wikipedia insists on publishing exposure of magical effects, at least get it right! Kosmoshiva 00:25, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Method Erroneous 

message: I have removed the method from the article as it is unsourced.  This is following the guidelines laid out in Wikipedia:WikiProject_Magic#Magic_Methods_and_Exposure.  If the method can be properly sourced, then it can be re-added. StephenBuxton (talk) 16:04, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Method removed