lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:International Journal of Astrobiology

message: How come this 7 years old journal doesn't appear in the ISI journals list? Maruvkay (talk) 08:53, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: While the Science manuscript may be unusually notable (for various reasons), the article cited here is not. It did not generate any particularly high interest at the time of publication, and therefore does not qualify as particularly noteworthy. Singling out this particular article as more noteworthy than other IJoA articles seems inappropriate. This may change if the Science data stands up to scrutiny, but for the moment it seems premature, and even in that case it would only be of moderate (historical) interest. The main notability of the Science manuscript at the moment is the scientific debate concerning data quality and peer review, and the interest it has received in the mainstream media. The article in the International Journal of Astrobiology is outside of this discussion.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.67.72.140 (talk) 18:54, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable papers
Talk:Bradford-on-Tone

message: Lots of useful information has been added about the church, and I've added some citations which can be verified by those who don't have access to the church leaflet. I think there is enough information, with suitable reliable sources to create a separate article about St Giles' Church, Bradford on Tone rather than overwhelm the village article. What do others think?— Rod talk 09:04, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Church 
Talk:Bowlish

message: While doing a quick search on Bowlish I found a reference in the House of Lords Journal to Thomas Strode, of Bowlish, paying his Fine of Two Hundred and Fifty Pounds, for bearing Arms against the Parliament. Does anyone know if this is the same person as William Strode? Dates etc match but I can't find enough info to confirm.— Rod talk 21:03, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Bodden

message: 67.81.26.177 added notable residents, but the reference appears to be an advert & not support the claims made - does anyone have any further info?— Rod talk 21:32, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bodden Famiy 

message: I think there is need for a disambiguation page here as the links in are to a village called Bodden in Somerset which was made into a redirect to Doulting (the parish it is in). I would sugest a Disambiguation page linking to both the Doutling article & the bodies of water in the Baltic.— Rod talk 14:56, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have created a redirect from "Bodden, Somerset" to "Doulting", which should show up in the search window as soon as the bots have done their work.  ciao Rotational (talk) 15:13, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks.— Rod talk 15:26, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need for DAB page
Talk:Bishops Lydeard

message: Last week a paragraph headed King's Church Quantocks which was a direct copy & paste from Kings Church Quantocks. I removed this text. It has now been reinserted and I have been contacted by email outside of wikipedia saying that the web site owner gives permission for this use. I have replied pointing to the relevant guidelines and procedures on wikipedia to enable this to happen and placed the copyvio notice on the article. I hope that the editor concerned will add a message here explaining the situation more fully.— Rod talk 08:10, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  ? Copyright violation 

message: I stumbled upon your article through the "random article" feature and have just corrected one or two grammatical errors and re- phrased certain sentences. For example the parish council is a single body and should be "it" and "is" as opposed to "they" and "are". I also capitalised Lower Mill, though you may disagree (I have no local knowledge of the village!). Kind Regards, HJ Mitchell (talk) 03:36, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Minor Edits
Talk:Bishop Walsh School

message: I don't see the point in putting that the school won the City baseball title in 1978 and 2007, for a couple reasons: first, those aren't the only years they won it; and second, because they won the city title in other sports that we don't mention. I don't think we should have incomplete information, and my motto is, when in doubt, leave it out.  Truce m3 18:05, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: baseball line seems fishy

message: This comment needs to be expanded.  25 years with what sort of championship?  Were they within the same sport?  This needs an explanation badly.  207.255.210.156 (talk) 03:05, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  25 years with a championship? 

message: I don't understand why the Mock Trial information is being deleted.  Final Four appearances are the benchmark standard the governing body, CLREP, uses to award plaques and recognition to the schools that compete and excel.  It isn't like the site is cluttered, it is barebones as it is.  Mock Trial is what BW does best.  Deleting the information only makes Wikipedia a less useful site for someone looking for information about Bishop Walsh. 
Lasersnake (talk) 01:01, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Seriously, do you think someone in Maine or Calcutta would be looking up your school hoping to find info on its mock trial team?  The fact that you describe the information using an acronym that no-one but people involved with whatever it is you do and from your state would understand indicates how you are thinking about this.  Any article on Wikipedia should be written to inform the entire English speaking world with useful (to them) information about whatever the subject is.  The statement above, "Mock Trial is what BW does best", is your opinion.  That is not what wikipedia is about.  It is about verifiable facts.  And I am sorry if you find this insulting, but if the school is so blasted "good" at this, why aren't there state championships to talk about? John from Idegon (talk) 14:52, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

text: Thanks for realizing that.  I was going to suggest a webpage for the content you want, as it will never be appropriate here.  Have a great day. John from Idegon (talk) 01:27, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

text: It's not. John from Idegon (talk) 16:39, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Keep the Mock Trial Info

message: Looking for Bishop Walsh campionship titles? Look no further! 2601:603:4800:5870:9948:68A2:51AA:3157 (talk) 00:34, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  BW Women’s Basketball Team wins 1971 all Cumberland title 

message: Bishop Walsh faculty included Christian Brothers, as stated in the text. But the order is officially the Christian Brothers de la Salle, not the Irish Christian Brothers orde. 2601:603:4800:5870:9948:68A2:51AA:3157 (talk) 00:37, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which Christian Brothers order?
Talk:Skid Row (American band) discography

message: There's no information about this single, and I can't find any either. Is there any source that this song actually was released as a single?--Mathias-90 (talk) 01:58, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "Strength" single

message: Some of the chart positions have been changed by 24.166.143.247 who has added false chart positions to several articles.  I would have reverted, but the formatting of the sections has been changed and other positions have been added and I don't have enough time to fix it now so I've just added a dispute template. snigbrook (talk) 18:00, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chart positions 

message: This has been an ongoing issue on this page.  The RIAA has never issued a Gold Certification for Subhuman Race, but a group of people keep adding a reference to the Gold and Platinum database where a certification is nowhere to be found.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:C41D:6AE0:74D1:879D:EBF6:9196 (talk) 06:03, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subhuman Race Is Not Certified Gold by the RIAA 

message: I noticed that The Gang's All Here doesn't have an article yet, despite being relatively well-received and charting higher than Thickskin or Revolutions Per Minute. Should that be a separate article? Currently, the article for The Gang's All Here (Skid Row album) redirects here, but I'm thinking it should be its own article. ~[thehappyspaceman] • talk • stalk • block 20:19, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  New article for The Gang's All Here?
Talk:Beckington

message: An addition to the "notable people" section has been added twice saying - "Patrick Martindale - the notable social theorist considered a world expert on the influence of Beveridge on the welfare state of post-war United Kingdom and the wider construction of the post-war consensus within British politics." I have removed this as there is no article for this person (see Wikipedia:Write the article first) and I can't find any references in books, websites or journals to his work or living in the village. If a citation can be provided we could put it back into the article.— Rod talk 21:03, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Patrick Martindale
Talk:Bawdrip

message: First sentence of History section. "There may have been quarrying on the hillside in the 15th century and lias was dug in the early 19th." Polite question: What is lias?
The two hamlets mentioned in the introduction used to be Bradney and Horsey. Horsey has been changed to Knowle, but the explanation for Horsey remains. Why? 
I know this is a short article about a tiny place, but I'm still curious.
Regards, --Oldontarian (talk) 14:20, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explanation needed
Talk:Fort New Richmond

message: References:
Searched the internet and Fort Baton Rouge does not exist.
Wikipedia should change its site from Fort New Richmond to Fort Baton Rouge AKA Fort New Richmond.
Fort New Richmond is only hearsay with no official documented backup.
Official drawings with title Fort Baton Rouge:
Plan of Fort Baton Rouge http://www.davidrumsey.com/maps5575.html
CORPS naming this fort, Fort Baton Rouge. See next page past page 32,  4. Site of Fort Baton Rouge. Because the 2nd Continental Congress Congressional agent Oliver Pollock and 10 other agents fought with Galvez at this fort it is a United States Army Fort and the CORPS named it Fort Baton Rouge. 
Site of Fort Baton Rouge, Down By the River History of the Baton Rouge River Front, US Army Corps of Engineers New Orleans District https://www.mvn.usace.army.mil/Portals/56/docs/PAO/Pubs/abt_batonrouge.pdf
Pages 16 and 17 show the British and Spanish fort are in Baton Rouge 
by Powell A. Casey  (Author)
Encyclopedia of Forts, Posts Named Camps, Camps and Military Installation Hardcover – June 1, 1983 https://www.amazon.com/Encyclopedia-Forts-Posts-Military-Installation/dp/0875116930
Powell showing this is a Fort of Baton Rouge IOW Fort Baton Rouge AKA Fort New Richmond.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Casey,_Powell_A.jpg  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kenn321 (talk • contribs) 17:05, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggest changing Title to Fort Baton Rouge AKA Fort New Richmond
Talk:Batheaston

message: I've just come across the stub article for Bannerdown. I suggest merging it with this article as Bannerdown is a small area and probably doesn't need its own article. It could be mentioned in this one & a redirect left in place.— Rod talk 18:41, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it should be merged. Instead of having the article stand alone like this, it would be a better article overall with it merged. The other one is just too short.DeadlyOps (talk) 14:36, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge now done.— Rod talk 15:45, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 
Talk:Bathampton

message: Is the first syllable "bat" or "bath"? - filelakeshoe (t / c) 23:58, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Bath, as in the nearby City, roughly "barrth", so the whole name sounds a bit like "barth-ampton". quota (talk) 13:56, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 
Talk:St Edward's Roman Catholic/Church of England School

message: This page is in need of some references Trigger...
http://www.ofsted.gov.uk/reports/pdf/?inspectionNumber=253026&providerCategoryID=8192&fileName=%5C%5Cschool%5C%5C113%5C%5Cs10_113893_20030429.pdf
Is the old Ofsted report when Mr Richmond was head - the current OFSTED is available also. 
Are there any school press releases?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Webchem (talk • contribs) 09:30, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  References...
Talk:Bath Half Marathon

message: There's been edits from IP accounts with a very clear bias introducing lines to the criticism section like "most runners supported the decision" without any source backing it up. Quite possibly a conflict of interest, and obviously not appropriate for wikipedia. If people think there's any value to lines like this, or they can be justified, then say so here before readding and maybe starting an edit war.Awoma (talk) 09:14, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The majority of runners supported the decision" etc
Talk:1983 Turkish general election

message: This article contains very serious factual mistakes of the sort which give Wikipedia a poor name. In 1983, the size of the Turkish Parliament (as the figures given actually show when added up) was 400 members, not 555 as stated. The Motherland Party got 211 seats and thus a working majority. The outgoing prime minister was not Suleyman Demirel whose previous term had ended with the coup on 12 September 1980 but Bulent Ulusu. It is amazing that such a wildly incorrect article on recent history has escaped attention. Compare it with the Turkish-language article in Vikipedia which seems to be correct or with the piece I wrote for the Financial Times on 3 November 1983.
David Barchard  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Barchard (talk • contribs) 12:17, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 
Talk:Bath Assembly Rooms

message: Hello editors, I'm working on a pilot project for the National Trust, which is looking at adding a discrete number of images to Wikimedia Commons, as well as introducing some volunteers to the principles of editing (more here). Some of the volunteers are based at Bath Assembly Rooms. Although they have a wide range of other interests, you might see a few edits from new editors appear here and I'd be grateful for your patience and support while they learn the ropes. Lajmmoore (talk) 10:18, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nationa Trust pilot
Talk:Batcombe, Somerset

message: I propose that Westcombe be merged into this article as it is already mentioned as one of the hamlets within the parish and with only 30 households is unlikely to be large enough to have its own significant article.— Rod talk 21:45, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: As there were no objections for a month I've now carried out the merge & left a redirect on the Westcombe article.— Rod talk 21:16, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 
Talk:Barwick, Somerset

message: I propose merging Stoford into this article as the two villages run into each other & Stoford is part of the parish of Barwck.— Rod talk 19:15, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: As no one had objected after more than a month, I've now merged the articles.— Rod talk 16:56, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: Any information or reference to help one locate the painting mentioned containing the follies, predating the usual story?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by DanielTrevorShaw (talk • contribs) 13:44, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Painting showing Follies ?
Talk:The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology

message: I have labeled this journal as having "high" importance due to its apparently being the most highly cited journal in the allergy-immunology medical speciality.  Feel free to downgrade this if you feel otherwise.  I think a better case could be made if the journal were >100 years old, but it only dates to 1929, and if it were an independent journal as opposed to an official association outlet. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 18:43, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Importance High designation
Talk:Barrington, Somerset

message: I propose that Westport, Somerset be merged into this article as it is within the parish of Barrington.— Rod talk 20:38, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I now propose merging it to the new Hambridge and Westport article.— Rod talk 13:43, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 
Talk:And You and I

message: I have a problem with this whole page as it's a blow-by-blow description of what happens if you simply listen to the song. There isn't any information, as exist for other iconic songs by the popular band Yes, about the origins of the song, how it was constructed, comments from the members of the band which they've made for the four decades since "And You And I" was released including explanations of lyrics, and all those yummies you find on Wiki pages for all the classic rockers of the time. This page didn't tell me anything I didn't already know, in other words.  #MyTwoCents  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Boris Gazpacho (talk • contribs) 16:41, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

message: The lyrics contain references to Isaac Asimov's Foundation Trilogy. Needs to be included in the article. Lee M (talk) 01:17, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Foundation references
Talk:Baltonsborough

message: I think this statement needs some support. Does the pub have a Facebook fanclub or something? Has it won prizes? Even some explanation of what makes it so great would be helpful.Celia Kozlowski (talk) 09:37, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed that unsupported POV comment & added a few other "citation needed" tags.— Rod talk 12:23, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the Greyhound one of the World's Greatest Pubs?
Talk:Animals (Nickelback song)

message: I can't really see how this is a rap/nu metal song. Chad Kroeger sings pretty quickly in it, but he doesn't exactly rap. This is just a straightforward hard rock song.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.55.106.102 (talk) 18:17, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "nu metal"/"rap metal"?
Talk:Annie (song)

message: This song, was as far as I know, never released as a single. The article should be modified or deleted. 142.157.197.116 (talk) 21:06, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It isn't coming up as a single. Anyway (Our Lady Peace song) isn't the only song which "exists" so moved per WP:SONGDAB. In ictu oculi (talk) 10:35, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Single?
Talk:Journal of Conflict Resolution

message: Does someone know where the green open-access versions of articles in this journal are normally published? Cosmology articles are almost always published at ArXiv under green open access. It's rather ironical that a journal about conflict resolution publishes articles that are mostly secret, making it difficult for knowledge about conflict resolution to spread... Boud (talk) 01:24, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Green open access versions
Talk:Ash Priors

message: I note that Ash Priors is in Kilmersdon Hundred according to your article. But the GENUKI reference which you cite states the following:
"KILMERSDON, a hundred in the county Somerset, contains the parishes of Ashwick, Babington, Buckland-Denham, Hardington, Hemington, Holcombe, Kilmersdon, Radstock, Stratton-on-the-Fosse, and Writhlington, comprising an area of 15,400 acres."
"KINGSBURY, a hundred in county Somerset, in six detached portions. It contains the parishes of Chard, Combe, Huish-Episcopi, Kingsbury-Episcopi, Winsham, Ash Priors, West Buckland, Fitzhead, Bishops Lydeard, Wellington, and Wiveliscombe, comprising an area of 36,690 acres." 
I would be glad to make the correction myself, but I don't know enough about the coding of the reference to be confident about doing it correctly.
Regards, --Oldontarian (talk) 14:13, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ash Priors in Kingsbury Hundred
Talk:Journal of High Technology Law

message: This seems like a Wiki-worthy entry, but more detail is needed.  I am looking for help to beef up this entry.  --Stlamanda (talk) 21:37, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs more information and citations 

message: I am de-PRODing per WP:JOURNALCRIT (Criterion 2). Per the Washington and Lee rankings, this journal has been cited 339 times by other law journals/reviews since 2008. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: De-PRODing justification
Talk:Hole discography

message: Mtv article stating 7 million ww. a href="http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1454516/20020523/hole.jhtml">
Also the Recent Courtney Love documentary stating 5 million.
Can anybody tell me where they got the world wide sales info from,besides the riaa certs?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.99.255.212 (talk) 21:05, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Albums alltogether worldwide? 
Talk:Domino Kirke

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
* Support - though the cats on the article will need changing. In ictu oculi (talk) 00:16, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: The file :c:File:Domino Kirke Portrait.jpg has been nominated for deletion on Commons 
 Reason: Not found at the URL which states © JR 2016. Identity of User:Hotelexistence should be verified via OTRS. 
 Deletion request: link 
Message automatically deposited by a robot - -Harideepan (talk) 13:25, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  File nominated for deletion on commons
Talk:The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease

message: The WikiProject classification for Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease is Start-class. However, the page has less than 100 words, so it might not meet the grading criteria. If it should be a stub, then please set  on this talk page & reinstate the stub tag(s) on the article page.   ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf)  15:17, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please confirm classification
Talk:Fehmarn

message: The introduction; 
: Fehmarn (Danish: Femern) is an island and - since 2003 - a town on this island in the Baltic Sea...
This is confusing; suddenly, in 2003, a town named Fehmarn materialised on the island of Fehmarn!? I get the gist of it from the German page, but to non-Germans ears it sounds odd that an entire island suddenly becomes a "town". I know Stadt translates to town in its direct sense, but in English you would not use town to describe an entire area of consisting of several separate "smallish urban areas" inbetween cornfields. I suggest we add a short paragraph to explain how and why the entire island of Fehmarn is a "town". 
-- 90.184.243.14 (talk) 09:21, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: To clarify this (what's seven years among friends?): Fehmarn has always been an island, the main village is called "Burg auf Fehmarn". What happend in 2003 is simply that the villages and hamlets on the island joined and formed a common administration. Since then there is "Fehmarn (the island)" and "Fehmarn (the town)" covering the same area.Nico b. (talk) 21:01, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The "Stadt" thing 
Talk:The Journal of Neuroscience

message: It seems to me that the section about Cassava Sciences should be removed as WP:UNDUE. It's a single incident as far as the Journal is concerned, and at a minimum it should not be the lengthiest part of the page. As written, it's not really WP:NPOV, with some statements that editorialize in Wikipedia's voice, and it's not really clear that what the Journal did, as opposed to what the authors of the papers did, is particularly noteworthy. --Tryptofish (talk) 23:48, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Note: . --Tryptofish (talk) 20:04, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

text: I agree this is undue weight, as it was a single incident. The journal was involved in the adjudication of Casava's publication and that effort had a large effect on Cassava share prices. But it is a small event in the journal's long history. IMO it mertis at most a sentence in a history section. -- {Talk} 20:45, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cassava Sciences