Talk:Stupid Spoiled Whore Video Playset

message: what the hell is going on? We don't need to recap every single detail!—Preceding unsigned comment added by What's up Dr. Strangelove (talk • contribs) 
:Then do something about it? ≈ The Haunted Angel 15:10, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  plot too long 

message: Scrambles was not a cat, he was a collie. I know because Paris said in the episode "Another DOG killed itself!" This means that all her pets were dogs. Grieferhate 11:41, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is enough for (the last) two of them to be dogs for tinkerbell to be "another dog" that killed itself. blades (talk) 10:10, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

text: It wasn't on the article, it was part of the Paris Hilton template - I've removed it now. Thanks for pointing it out! ≈ The Haunted Angel 17:13, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Scrambles, Paris Hilton's "pet"

message: :Image:812StupidSpoiledWhoreVideo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 08:33, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:812StupidSpoiledWhoreVideo.jpg

message: I have redirected this episode because it was comprised mainly of plot, and had little to no outside information on the episode. The workers who sculpted the article's efforts were not in vain, though. The episode's contents now exist identically in South Park Wiki. Just so you know. Wilhelmina Will (talk) 07:19, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect

message: Cite and return to the cite page;
* While Butters digs for coal, he sings a song that resembles "Sixteen Tons", using a combination of the original lyrics and his own ("You work eighteen hours/What do you get?/Your parents sell you/to Paris Hilton").
* The Stupid Spoiled Whore Video Playset is made by Letcher-Price, a parody of Fisher-Price. The cover includes four girls styled like Bratz.
* The ending scene (Paris Hilton in Mr. Slave's anus, encountering the Frog King) is a reference to South Park ep. 614 (The Death Camp of Tolerance), where the class pet Lemmiwinks meets a similar fate but finally escapes Mr. Slaves intestines, in turn a reference to the 1977 Rankin/Bass animated adaptation of The Hobbit. The ending song is also taken from that episode, with slightly changed lyrics.
Alastairward (talk) 14:23, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a point of view I don't understand.  When someone quotes something which happens in the episode, what more cite can there be?  I suppose there must be a way to cite the episode.  How does that work? - Denimadept (talk) 16:18, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a point of view supported by the verifiability policy. If one wishes to add something to the article that can't be proved, then one shouldn't. Where one gets a citation from is not something I can or should advise upon. I cannot see how a simple direct quote of the episode is sufficient citation for the so called "cultural references" above, they require some speculation, which requires a reference to support. Alastairward (talk) 22:57, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This is ridiculous. I come to Wikipedia to look up information on an episode of a show, I expect to find something more than just a simple plot summary. It's often the information that gets cut out like this that I find the most interesting, as it at least attempts to address some of my questions about said episodes. This sort of illogical logic is one of the main reasons the South Park entries on Wikipedia are so lacking in interesting information. How far of a stretch does one need to go before Letcher Price becomes anything OTHER than Fisher Price? In fact, most of the removed information I've seen on this pages are either backed up within the episodes themselves, or are so blatently obvious that you'd have to be blind not to pick up on it. Perhaps Wikipedia should re-examine some of its policies and how they apply to various situations. What would you suggest then, a link to Fisher Price? An image showing both logos next to each other? Dakmordian (talk) 20:45, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uncited material 

message: I am curious if there is an update to Paris Hilton's reaction to the episode.  Her last quote showed she was flattered.  Has she seen the episode as of yet?  Sorry if I edited this wrong as I am a Wikipedia noob.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ERIC S4646 (talk • contribs) 02:44, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Paris Hilton's reaction to the episode