Talk:A.out

message: according to "An unsung hero: The hardworking ELF": "a.out appeared in V7 UNIX"; not in V6 UNIX
:Seebs is probably trying to simplify UNIX history for the benefit of those who have barely heard of V7 (I'd guess the latter); I distinctly remember a.out-format files on V6.  Note that he said it "appeared in V7", not that it first appeared in V7. Guy Harris 07:13, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Dennis Ritchie's scanned First Edition manuals indicate that the executable format on the first version of UNIX was an ancestor of the first PDP-11 a.out format.  Guy Harris 07:20, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  where it appeared? 

message: On http://www.quora.com/Unix/What-is-the-source-of-the-name-a-out the following link was identified discussing Thompson's PDP-7 assembler:
http://cm.bell-labs.com/who/dmr/chist.html
I'm interested in feedback - do you feel this a sufficient citation for this?  if so why? why not?
PaulReiber (talk) 02:39, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  citation for naming of a.out - "assembler output" 

message: the Denis Ritchie's paper: The Development of the C Language redirect to http://cm.bell-labs.com/who/dmr/chist.html which is a dead link.
Cheers.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Magnetwi (talk • contribs) 15:01, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: There is another link with accessible pdf at http://heim.ifi.uio.no/inf2270/programmer/historien-om-C.pdf. Either this, if there is no copyright infringement or archive.org link with last accessed page should be put instead of the dead link.  —Preceding comment added by fragrant   — Preceding undated comment added 06:30, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:   the external link. — Dsimic (talk | contribs) 03:26, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Development of the C Language appears to be a dead link 

message: a.out remains the default output file name for executables created by certain compilers and linkers when no output name is specified, even though these executables have been compiled and linked (not assembled)
The above sentence makes little sense. While it is possible to output the result of compiling a program, that result is useless unless you assemble and link it. The default output, for example, by compiling source.c with gcc without assembling it (that is, converting it to assembly) is source.s, not a.out. In contrast a.out is the default filename when the source has been assembled. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.130.79.38 (talk) 11:50, 14 April 2015‎ (UTC)
: That's a good point,  should be taking care of that by removing the confusing description. — Dsimic (talk | contribs) 13:11, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nonsense about compiling and assembling 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on A.out. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040713171954/http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/historic-linux/distributions/slackware/3.9/docs/ELF-HOWTO to http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/historic-linux/distributions/slackware/3.9/docs/ELF-HOWTO
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:16, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified