Talk:Social intelligence

message: Psychologist and professor at the London School of Economics Nicholas Humphrey believes it is social intelligence or the richness of our qualitative life, rather than our quantitative intelligence, that truly makes humans what they are – for example what it's like to be a human being living at the centre of the conscious present, surrounded by smells and tastes and feels and the sense of being an extraordinary metaphysical entity with properties which hardly seem to belong to the physical world
This passage from the lead is duplicated in the section How is Intelligence Different to Social Intelligence. --Open 2 (talk) 10:09, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Duplication of language is not a problem per se so long as the lead summarizes clearly and concisely. I'm of the opinion that leads should evolve on their own merit, to be the best lead possible, as viewed relative to the content and scope of the rest of the article, and not its specific language. — MaxEnt 18:02, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Duplicated passages

message: I suggest the article should at least distinguish artificial social intelligence and other uses of social intelligence. A disambiguation page may be in order. --Fasten 11:29, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Different uses of "social intelligence" 

message: I know the native language of the original writer of the article is not English, but the caveman reference previously on this page was uncalled-for. Keeno 21:10, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: not English

message: Is there an article about social IQ tests? --Shultz IV 21:57, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No but you try an article about Theory of Mind Flynneffects (talk) 18:36, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Social IQ tests 

message: "This test could also be used to assess people that might have some sort of a personality disorder such as Schizophrenia or ADHD."
Schizophrenia and ADHD are NOT classified as personality disorders! Schizophrenia is a psychotic mental disorder (ie, relating to perception), and ADHD is a developmental disorder (ie, relating to cognition.)Guinevere34 (talk) 12:34, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect Classification!

message: Isn't it talking about diplomacy and force someone to lie for the situation? Then what is the moral here? --Rrjanbiah (talk) 05:33, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diplomacy? 

message: There needs to be some reference to ideas that identify social intelligence as something that does not need seperate identification apart from IQ as it simply refers to knowledge gathered relating to other people...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.32.188.25 (talk) 18:23, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opposing arguments? 

message: This used to be part of the Wechsler intelligence scales and was sometimes thought to measure social intelligence. Should be mentioned in the article. Flynneffects (talk) 08:22, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture Arrangement subtest

message: I have posted a bibliography of   Intelligence Citations for the use of all Wikipedians who have occasion to edit articles on human intelligence and related issues. I happen to have circulating access to a huge academic research library at a university with an active research program in those issues (and to another library that is one of the ten largest public library systems in the United States) and have been researching these issues since 1989. You are welcome to use these citations for your own research and to suggest new sources to me by comments on that page. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk) 19:50, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intelligence Citations Bibliography for Articles Related to IQ Testing 

message: I cut the part below out of the section "Additional views" because it is not written in an encyclopedic way and I don't know how to edit this. Only Babu's definition is kept. Lova Falk talk 18:38, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Trimmed material from § Additional views

message: I hereby confirm that this lead requires a rework. It reads like five authorial blurbs scraped off the back of best-selling popular science tome then shovelled into a waffle iron. In the spirit of GTD's next step mantra: the obvious next step is to insert a new sentence #2 between the first, defining sentence and the community survey. — MaxEnt 18:08, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Lead rewrite flagged October 2017

message: — Assignment last updated by MammothSunflower (talk) 17:44, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Industry Theory and Practice