Talk:Hogzilla

message: Claiming that only a handful of "conspiracy theorists" believe the bigfoot (or sasquatch) to be real--to, in fact, represent an unknown bipedal primate living in the Pacific Northwest region of North America--represents not an only utterly subjective judgement, but also incorrect even in regard of the use of the term, "conspiracy theorist."  What "conspiracy" theory is used to explain bigfoot's existence?  As for the type of person who believes this animal might actually exist, Jane Goodall is one of them, as are/were the following:
Dr. Bernard Heuvelmans  (zoologist, France)
Dr. W. Henner Fahrenbach  (research scientist, Oregon Regional Primate Center)
Dr. Grover Krantz (physical anthropologist - retired, Washington State University)
Dr. John Napier  (primatologist, University of London)
Dr. Frank E. Poirier (paleoanthropologist/primatologist, Ohio State University)
Dr. Jeff Meldrum (anatomist, Idaho State University)
Dr. John Bindernagel  (wildlife biologist, former wildlife advisor for United Nations)
Dr. D. W. Grieve  (anatomist, Royal Free Hospital School of Medicine, London)
Dr. John Bodley  (anthropologist, Washington State University)
Dr. Dmitri D. Donskoy  (biomechanics, Russia)
Dr. Robert Pyle (ecologist,Yale University alumnus)
Dr. J. Richard Greenwell (mammalogist, International Wildlife Museum, Tucson)
Dr. William Montagna (primatologist, Regional Primate Research Center)
Valentin B. Sapunov (biologist, Leningrad State Univeristy, Russia)
Vladimir Markotic (physical anthropologist, University of Calgary)
Jeff Glickman  (computer scientist, North American Science Institute)
Dmitri Bayanov (hominologist, Darwin Museum, Russia)
Jim Hewkin (wildlife biologist, formerly with Oregon Dept. of Fish and Wildlife)
Dr. Marie-Jeanne Koffman, aka Dr. Zh. I Kofman (scientist, Russia)
Dr. R. Lynn Kirlin (professor, University of Wyoming)
Dr. William Saxe Wihr (department of anthropology, Portland Community College)
Dr. LeRoy Fish (wildlife ecologist, retired) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.67.138.76 (talk • contribs) 9 August 2005
:Ummm...right, so just make the change.  No need for the soapbox.  CPitt76 16:33, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: They're not too keen on reesurch down south. If it moves and it's tasty, it's fair game. — NRen2k5 19:09, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Heck, even a small boar does a lot of damage (72.66.116.212 09:29, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

message: Doesn't that section sound like it comes from an FAQ? I suspect plagarism.--Foot Dragoon 03:19, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Are large boars unusual?" 

message: Isn't it simpler to say that the guy mis-measured the hog -because- it was hanging by its feet, and he measured its hind legs in addition to its body length? There's no reason for them to argue about whose measurements were more accurate when they obviously weren't measuring by the same standard. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.122.63.142 (talk • contribs) 13 September 2006
hogzilla is coooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooool
: Yes it is. But try not to use so many letters in a word, or it'll mess up the page.--MDude 01:16, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Occam's Razor 

message: http://www.kare11.com/news/national/national_article.aspx?storyid=145928 64.236.128.27 23:45, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  One shot and photographed 

message: That's a big pig. D-Fluff has had E-Nuff 21:22, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wow