Talk:Bulkington

message: I disagree with the amendments made by anonymous user 84.68.55.79 on 28 July, changing all instances of the word "village" to "town", and adding the comment "still often referred to as a village", as if the original text were out of date. I live in Bulkington and have never heard anyone refer to the place as a town, always as a village. Likewise, no shop names, service names or signs refer to it as a town. Moreover, the number of businesses and amenities in Bulkington, and indeed the size and feel of the place do not, in my opinion, justify town status. Does anyone else have any opinions on the matter, and on whether or not the changes should be reverted? --Leon Robbins 16:55, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Bulkington. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090106202155/http://www.nuneatonandbedworth.gov.uk/environment-planning/conservation/conservation-areas/bulkington-conservation-area to http://www.nuneatonandbedworth.gov.uk/environment-planning/conservation/conservation-areas/bulkington-conservation-area
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090106202155/http://www.nuneatonandbedworth.gov.uk/environment-planning/conservation/conservation-areas/bulkington-conservation-area to http://www.nuneatonandbedworth.gov.uk/environment-planning/conservation/conservation-areas/bulkington-conservation-area
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090106202155/http://www.nuneatonandbedworth.gov.uk/environment-planning/conservation/conservation-areas/bulkington-conservation-area to http://www.nuneatonandbedworth.gov.uk/environment-planning/conservation/conservation-areas/bulkington-conservation-area
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090106202155/http://www.nuneatonandbedworth.gov.uk/environment-planning/conservation/conservation-areas/bulkington-conservation-area to http://www.nuneatonandbedworth.gov.uk/environment-planning/conservation/conservation-areas/bulkington-conservation-area
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081224050437/http://www.nuneatonandbedworth.gov.uk:80/council-democracy to http://www.nuneatonandbedworth.gov.uk/council-democracy
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090106202155/http://www.nuneatonandbedworth.gov.uk/environment-planning/conservation/conservation-areas/bulkington-conservation-area to http://www.nuneatonandbedworth.gov.uk/environment-planning/conservation/conservation-areas/bulkington-conservation-area
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090106202155/http://www.nuneatonandbedworth.gov.uk/environment-planning/conservation/conservation-areas/bulkington-conservation-area to http://www.nuneatonandbedworth.gov.uk/environment-planning/conservation/conservation-areas/bulkington-conservation-area
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110718042300/http://www.st-james-jun.warwickshire.sch.uk:80/pages/viewpage.asp?uniqid=7968 to http://www.st-james-jun.warwickshire.sch.uk/pages/viewpage.asp?uniqid=7968
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090712235952/http://www.ardenforest.warwickshire.sch.uk:80/pages/viewpage.asp?uniqid=10749 to http://www.ardenforest.warwickshire.sch.uk/pages/viewpage.asp?uniqid=10749
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090106202155/http://www.nuneatonandbedworth.gov.uk/environment-planning/conservation/conservation-areas/bulkington-conservation-area to http://www.nuneatonandbedworth.gov.uk/environment-planning/conservation/conservation-areas/bulkington-conservation-area
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100214002102/http://www.methodists5-10.org.uk:80/ryton/index.htm to http://www.methodists5-10.org.uk/ryton/index.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:05, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Bulkington. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070806182757/http://www.bedworth-society.co.uk/about%20bedworth.html to http://www.bedworth-society.co.uk/about%20bedworth.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121207043741/http://www.bedworth-society.co.uk/time%20line.html to http://www.bedworth-society.co.uk/time%20line.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.methodists5-10.org.uk/ryton/index.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:26, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bulkington. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090215064133/http://www.bmsgh.org/parish/warw/tyaiw/bulkington.html to http://www.bmsgh.org/parish/warw/tyaiw/bulkington.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:52, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: no consensus to change the current setup at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 04:24, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Think that a new RM is needed, clearly WP:NOPRIMARY. In ictu oculi (talk) 19:30, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  the last RM was closed as no consensus nearly a year and a half ago. Given that both a long time and something has changed drastically I think a new RM is indeed needed. See a similar case at Talk:Fulford, North Yorkshire#Requested move 3 August 2018 that was closed as no consensus and then Fulford, Staffordshire was created and then at Talk:Fulford#Requested move 14 May 2019 it was moved. I would suggest a new RM at Talk:Bulkington (disambiguation). Crouch, Swale (talk)  20:38, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I do believe that you are right that a RM from the dab would make more sense. However I can see some editors objecting so the old RM - which should have passed anyway per reality  will be visible. So have placed template here, again. In ictu oculi (talk) 20:52, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 23 January 2019 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Not moved.   Calidum 19:26, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Well they were moot in the previous discussion as well, had editors followed WP:TITLE and not article titles. In ictu oculi (talk) 20:53, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 15 July 2020