lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Neuroendocrinology

message: I deleted the external link to http://www.neuroendocrinology.org/ because it does not comply with Wikipedia's external links and spam guidelines: "Adding external links to an article or user page for the purpose of promoting a website or a product is not allowed, and is considered to be spam." Wikipedia:SPAM Also: "You should avoid linking to a website that you own, maintain or represent, even if the guidelines otherwise imply that it should be linked." Wikipedia:EL#Advertising_and_conflicts_of_interest 
Horus (talk) 20:39, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Personal Ads

message: Neuroendocrine system redirects to this article. I wonder if that is such a good idea. The article Neuroendocrinology should be about the study, with important researchers, journals etc, whereas the article neuroendocrine system should be about the interaction between the nervous system and the endocrine system. Lova Falk talk 13:59, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  neuroendocrine system 

message: Hello,
I am working with my class to edit pages on wikipedia and one of my assignments was to evaluate this article and come up with a related questino. I was wondering if the endocrine and neuro systems are so closely related, is it possible that when treating neurological symptoms we are actually creating endocrine problems and vice versa? Yostrerov (talk) 05:19, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wiki Student Program 

message: 1. Make sections for both neuroendocine system--focused on the relationship between the nervous and endocrine systems-- and neuroendocrinology-- focused on the science, founders, important journals, etc.
2. Go through references and add in-text citations where possible.
3. Expand reference section
4. Add figures diagramming important processes 
Please let me know if there are more things I should do, or what I should do instead of one of these steps.
Cs4652 (talk) 17:11, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updating Plans
Talk:Fenelon Falls

message: Fenelon Falls is a village, not a small town
Only Northeastern Part of the main street is called Colborne Street
The west side of the Bridge is called Lindsay street.
The site of the present day bridges is not chosen to save money;
a) at the time the original bridge was built it was in search of the smallest span, and this translated to economy ca 1850s. Subsequent bridges continue to be in this site for the same reason.  The CPR bridge being further upstream was built later, and for different reasons.
b)the town was built around the two bridges bridge.. and so to move the main street to get a better view of the falls would be largely impractical.  As well, following the building of the 1880's canal system, serious clearance issues for navigation emerged, cementing the location of the present day bridges forever, unless a major by-pass is undertaken, as in neighboring Bobcaygeon.  Following the Provincial downloading of roads in the area to counties, this seems unlikely.
b) from May 25 1955 when the DHO began administering the highway until Jan 1, 1998 these bridges were administrated as King's highway 121.  prior to this, they were administered by the County of Victoria. Following 1998, these bridges were administered by the Couty of Victoria until the 2001 amalgamation of the city of Kawartha Lakes.  
Thus, the town fathers had nothing to do with the location of the present bridge.
:There was a discussion about building a new bridge away from the present falls position which was vetoed by them though. Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 07:57, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: First of all, this needs a footnote or citation of some kind - and the old man siting on his porch on Colborne St. doesn't count. Secondly, can this even be proven? What about Bobcaygeon? Was Fenelon Falls immortalized in a Tragically Hip song? LOL. None of this matters - that statement just doesn't belong in the article so I took it out. If we want people to read these articles about smaller towns and villages we have to keep them credible and reliable.
--Jkentrandall (talk) 17:45, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Easily the most recognizable place in the Kawarthas?"
Talk:Wildcard character

message: What is there to gain from merging this article with the Glob() article? I can't see the point of it. You would also have to merge it with the wildmat article as that is almost the same thing. I found this article when I was looking to find out the actual wildcard characters that are used in a SQL query statement. Knowing that they were different from those in Access I thought it might be useful to add that. I assumed this would be more of an article relating to actual wildcard characters from different environments where further examples could be added to assist others in their search for appropriate wildcard usage. Maybe wildcards are on the way out as DirkvdM suggested and there is no room for this old school stuff anymore.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bigsteworld (talk • contribs) 19:06, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge? 

message: In Unix-like OS, the question mark matches exactly one character, not zero.  Also, in MS-DOS, the way dots are handled seems to be special, since for example foo.* matches foo as well; maybe this should be mentioned.  — 80.174.59.39 (talk) 00:19, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some notes on "?" and "*" wildcards behavior on files and directories 

message: Are there any wildcard strings that can substitute for the part of the domain address that precedes the .com (or .org, etc.)? Tmangray (talk) 18:48, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Most web browsers use  to match any domain portion for specifying inclusion/exclusion rules (e.g.,  or ). — Loadmaster (talk) 00:10, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: EMail addresses
Talk:Rehabilitation

message: I have just cleaned up this disambig page, and have had to remove some material. If you would like to insert some uses of this word for which there are currently no articles, please consider: 
#investigating the subject to determine if an encyclopedic (as opposed to a lexicographic) entry is possible. If it is probably not possible to write very much more than a dictionary definition of the word, please do not begin an article on it;
#writing at least a referenced stub on the subject before including the term here on the disambig page, if you believe the subject is worthy of encyclopedic treatment on WP.
—Encephalon 08:19, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Hexafluoroacetone

message: I deleted the hydrogen because the hydrogen has to come from nowhere, because there is no hydrogen in the metal nor in the Hexafluoroacetone.Stone 08:20, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Stone, I found that piece of information in a MSDS document for hexafluoroacetone under the "stability & reactivity" section (#10):(http://www.airliquide.com/safety/msds/en/063_AL_EN.pdf). Honestly I can't vouch for its rightness and I agree with you that if hydrogen is formed in those conditions it will come from neither the HFA, nor the metal. May it be coming from the moisture? If you have or find evidence that claim is wrong feel free to remove it.Cheers, Berserker79 08:51, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Berserker79 the moisture mentioned in the paper has to go into the article, because the hydrogen source has to be mentioned. In chemical experiments under inert atmosphere only HF will form. So if the moisture is in everything is OK.Stone 09:54, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

text: The original image which is correct has been restored.  --Ed (Edgar181) 15:24, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  of [[hydrogen]] gas 

message: To be (annoyingly?) precise, hexafluoroacetone is not organic and should be listed as an inorganic stub.--Smokefoot 13:25, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Often (or usually, depending on where you are from), an organic compound contains C-H bonds.  Thus carbon disulfide, carbonate, and hexafluoroacetone would not qualify.  Many chemists would say that the rule is too strict and that one can intuitively identify an organic compound by looking at the structure.  You can see that WE-chem currently defines organic compound as only having carbon. --Smokefoot 20:23, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not that I am losing any sleep over this but CS2 is mainly made from CH4, as I recently discovered: CH4 + 4 S  -->  CS2  +  2 H2S--Smokefoot (talk) 15:12, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Any "rule" that would exclude urea and uric acid as organic molecules is bollocks IMO. The only distinction is conventional; most of the inorganic carbon containing compounds are classified as inorganic only for historical reasons dating from the 19th century. I don't think many people would seriously consider hexafluoroacetone inorganic, as it is seen as an acetone derivative rather than an "inorganic" substance of "non-living" origin (as is the case with carbonates, for example). --Itub (talk) 10:31, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: HFA is inorganic

message: The article says that "The most common form of this substance is hexafluoroacetone sesquihydrate (1.5 H2O), which is a geminal diol."  To be precise, the geminal diol would be the MONOhydrate.  The sequihydrate  must be a hemihydrate of the geminal diol: () · 0.5().  Correct? --Jorge Stolfi (talk) 07:08, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe HO-C-O-C-OH?--Smokefoot (talk) 13:09, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why SESQUIhydrate?
Talk:Domino Vitali

message: Rather than creating a separate article for Domino Petachi (as seen in Never Say Never Again), I have added her information to this article, since she is basically the same character under a new last name. If anyone thinks a redirect is needed, let me know Nude Amazon 08:26, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind, I found a reference here, so I created a redirect myself Nude Amazon 11:14, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:Electrical engineering

message: Whats the difference between electronic engineering and electrical engineering ?? Potential merge? Fresheneesz 08:36, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Electronic engineering focuses on low voltages (within the range of mV), lower than the utility voltages (110/120 V or 220/240 V). While for electrical engineering, it covers the whole range of voltages. While for the other one, power engineering, it covers utility voltages and higher. Chongkian (talk) 14:10, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: We need to keep the category free of everyones favourite electrical devices as they have their own categories. Per any xx engineering discipline category, the distinction between the engineering process and discipline and the end products needs to be maintained. --Hooperbloob (talk) 18:02, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Device inclusion
Talk:CCTV Images

message: This page has been started to concentrate on CCTV images, how they are produced, and their respective quality.
This page should not be redirected to Closed Circuit Television otherwise that page will become too large as it will incorporate too many aspects of the subject.
The external link considered as "spam" has been removed as a compromise - but only as a compromise. If the page is redirected it will be reverted back to CCTV Images as a separate page and subject. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Londonlinks (talk • contribs) 
:*I am not interested in getting into an edit war with you over this.  I personally, don't see anything here that makes me believe that this article should stay.  If you are going to insist that it stay, however, clean it up and make it look like a Wikipedia article.  If you have any questions regarding what that means see the documentation links left on your talk page.  James084 13:35, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Barindra Kumar Ghosh

message: In this partial sentence ("Following the attempted killing of Kingsford by 2 revolutionaries Khudiram and Prafulla on April 30, 1908...", Kingsford is never identified.  Who was Kingsford?  The closest person in Wikipedia named "Kingsford" was Herbert Kingsford, a poet who died in 1911. Jtyroler (talk) 13:12, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: see the article Khudiram Bose; Kingsford was a British magistrate.73.131.177.181 (talk) 04:38, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kingsford 

message: There must be more info available on his later personal life.73.131.177.181 (talk) 04:42, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Family & love-life?
File talk:BlanketManofWellington.jpg

message: It certainly looks like an iPod Glutnix 09:09, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I took the pic zoomed from the drivers seat, he certainly was 'dancing' appeared to be to music. I got it just as the light went green, accounting for the camera shake. moza 12:04, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is he listening to an iPod?
Talk:Double superscript notation

message: This page should not be a REDIRECT, because it is neither a misspelling, nor a synonym. If people are taken to "double subscript notation" when they think they want "double superscript notation", they will be confused. Fresheneesz 09:11, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I see what you mean - however, if we made it clear on the Double Subscript Notation page that Double Superscript Notation is actually called Double Subscript Notation, would that not clarify matters? Or have I misunderstood? Kel-nage 17:47, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  It would clarify things, but I think that it would put unnecessary clutter on the double subscript page. I mean, how many people really make that mistake (just my stupidty, and.. yours?). Fresheneesz 19:24, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Heh, no, I found the page by clicking "Random article" plenty of times (it's how I do Wiki, I randomly search until I find pages that need improving). If it's so unlikely people will make the mistake, surely it can just be a redirect? Kel-nage 17:01, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Happiness & Disaster

message: Thanks to Marcus for taking the (hidden track) off the track listing. It was supposed to be a hidden track in the beginning, kind of like how track one was supposed to be titled Go Get Your Guns, but I guess last minute decisions are made, and now Everybody isn't hidden, and track one is titled Don't Look In Their Eyes. Thanks again. Millsy62 05:50, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Everybody
Talk:Act 1: Goodbye Friends of the Heavenly Bodies

message: added tracklist
Millsy62 09:35, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Track Listing
Talk:Neverending White Lights

message: I added a discography (more albums are expected in the future) as well as Act 1: Goodbye Friends of the Heavenly Bodies. 
Millsy62 09:34, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Added Album

message: The articles Neverending White Lights and Daniel Victor have a lot of duplication. Which is logical, as the former is the main project of one musician, the latter. But it would probably be better for the readers if it were just one article without this duplication. I have no real preference about which way the merge should go - Daniel Victor does other stuff and is therefore a slightly wider topic, but Neverending White Lights is probably the more recognisable search term. Jdcooper (talk) 22:38, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Jordanhill School

message: I hesitated over adding the information on the college, and its role in the foundation of the school, to Jordanhill College, which seems to focus mostly on physical education, as opposed to teacher training. If anyone can think of a good way to structure these two articles, I'd be interested in hearing about it. Nach0king 09:35, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

message: More references needed to back up your claims. More content, pics and an infobox needed to advance to a B. Mid importance because it is a top-performing state school (presuming the unreferenced claim is true).Dahliarose 13:26, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assess
Talk:SCR-584 radar

message: I've added an image taken from . Three other images which may be worthy of inclusion are found at ,  and . — Itai (talk) 10:32, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article is good, but it should emphasize more that automatic following was the key innovation.  There was a new era of control theory starting then, centered at Bell Labs and MIT (Norbert Wieber, Nyquist, Shannon, and others) and there was a hell of a lot of new math behind both the SCR-584 and the M-9 predictor.
There was a triple combination of inventions in this anti-aircraft system: the SCR-584 with automatic following, the M-9 electrical analog computer, and the VT proximity fuze.
Even more impressive shoot-down figures for Antwerp can be found; by then close to 90% kill rate for V-1s.  We talk about London so much, and forget that Antwerp got more V-1 and V-2 attacks than anywhere else. DonPMitchell (talk) 19:08, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Could use work 

message: The SCR-584 was a huge advance because it used cybernetics to automatically track a target.  This major fact is almost buried in the article, which goes on repetitively about the British giving them the magnetron tubes.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.97.30.208 (talk) 21:21, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  burying the lede
Talk:Gladstone, Queensland

message: Anything needed here?  I can do anything here as I live here.  I will try and see if I can expand it and talk about the industry seeing as there is alot here! Banana.girl 10:33, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think it is a matter of the content on Queensland Alumina having been "reduced", its more along the lines of never having been added in the first place. I don't think anyone has sat down and really had a good go at this article. Instead, the article has just grown in piecemeal fashion. Without a doubt, the story of the industrial development of Gladstone is a fascinating one; I would encourage you to be bold and expand the section yourself. Wikipedia is the encyclopedia anyone can edit! Cheers, Mattinbgn\talk 22:09, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Please don't update the Gladstone census data just yet. Only certain types of data have been released, e.g. suburbs, local government, but not the urban data for towns and cities (which we need for Gladstone). See https://www.abs.gov.au/census/2021-census-data-release-plans/2021-census-product-release-guide#2021-data-release (look under the tab labelled Geographies available in QuickStats). Thanks Kerry (talk) 09:24, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  2021 census
Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/FourthAve FourthAve

message: FouthAve, your response is further illustration of the points I made in the request.  Also your response belongs under the section called "Response".  And to address your accusation of partisanship, I have removed Republican spin from a Democratic Congressman (Lane Evans) within the last week. - Jaysus Chris 10:54, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Response

message: It seems to me that FourthAve is definetly proving our points about his behavior.  I have said before that do to something like this, and then sign it is like taping yourself throwing a rock through someone's living room window and then leaving the tape on the person's front door.  I do honestly wish that he would cease this behavior so that he can continue to make useful contributions to Wikipedia, but our wishes seem to be falling on deaf ears.
JesseG 20:41, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  FourthAve is definetly proving our points 

message: I found this on the WP:No personal attacks page: "Similarly, slander, libel, or defamation of character is not to be tolerated on Wikipedia. True instances of such writing, which might legitimately expose Wikipedia to legal sanction..."
Could this be the case in the case of FourthAve?  If Rev. Bullock, the University of Dubuque, or the Nussle family decided that FourthAve's behavior rose to the level of slander, libel, defamation of character, etc, would they have a case which could expose Wikipedia itself to legal liability?
JesseG 01:22, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question About Legal Exposure

message: Far from knowing (and caring) about the lurid details of the subject matter, relevant - certifyable - details need to be involved. Important that it is worded factually and not in an attacking way. For example.
"Reports of his extra-marital affair, which lead to his divorce ..."
*"... have caused a rift amongst his supporters"
*"... opened him up to attack by his political opponents, who made his "lack of familyvalues" the theme of their campain against him"
*"... has caused a decline in his oppinion polls"
obviously these are just hypothetical examples which would need proper sourcing iE weblinks to reputable newssources. Maybe if we can convince FourthAve to think along those line he would be able to insert the details he feels so important about without resorting to attacks on the subject.  Agathoclea 11:13, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestions 

message: Because FourthAve has refused to take this process seriously, I have requested arbitration. - Jaysus Chris 12:09, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Arbitration
Talk:Kurdish culture

message: "one of the richest, healthiest and finest."
This is all POV. Also, please reference all the info in this article. The current link of the center does not provide the source of this information. --MysticRum 17:50, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Tell me about it. How about this one; Kurdish cultural heritage is rooted in one of the world's oldest cultures, the Mesopotamian - mesopotamia? Kurds are not semetic, how can they part of mesopotamia? This article is very inaccurate and baised. Chaldean 06:49, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  No reference and POV. 

message: this section has been updated and more information has been provided. Flavallee:Talk 08:56, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cultural Heritage 

message: This page is pointless. There's already a wiki page on Kurds, which involves culture, food, religion, arts, history, and the different type of Kurdish tribes. There's no point in even merging this page with the other since the other page has more information on culture than this one. 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kurds#Culture  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FEA8:201F:FF8D:D1B7:F328:82D2:7B6F (talk) 05:56, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Close this page
Talk:Terrorvision

message: The article says:
"All subsequent singles achieved Top 40 entries in the UK, culminating in the release of "Tequila", which reached number 2.[2]"
and then later:
"Thus, despite having their greatest hit in 1999 with the track, they were dropped by their record label, EMI, after the release of the album's third single, "III Wishes". It was the band's first single to fall outside the UK Top 40 since the release of "My House", six years earlier. "
Should the first be limited to the time for EMI? Or is the second statement incorrect
Icarusgeek (talk) 18:23, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  All top 40 or not?