lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Superpartner

message: This makes no sense. No information could possibly go here that is not covered already by the SuSy article. If nobody objects, I'm redirecting. -- Xerxes 03:41, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not so sure.  It's kind of a useful definition to have at the top when you link the word.  I know that's not what articles are for, so I'm kind of undecided... -- SCZenz 03:44, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect 

message: Discovery of such a particle is considered essential to proving superstring theories or M-theory.  I don't think this is really true.  String theory seems to be perfectly happy with SUSY breaking at the GUT scale, in which case we won't discover any superpartners at the TeV scale.  HEL 22:35, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed... I removed it -- it's probably technically wrong too since the heterotic O(16)xO(16) string has no susy but is not that far from realising the world.  In addition, I tend to agree that everything could go into the supersymmetry article. ~~ jay 05:56, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: String theory?

message: Is the term "shadow particle" warrented here?
The article does not mention them.
Of the two citations in the intro/lead, one of them uses the term "shadowy" 
when refering too the Higgs Boson aka god particle.  — CpiralCpiral 02:36, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  shadowy 

message: I noticed that a linked page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portmanteau) is badly corrupted (no longer even a Wiki page).  Since I can't post this note there, I thought I would post it here, at the parent page (since I didn't know where else to post it).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.131.208.23 (talk) 00:14, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corrupted Page
Talk:Production theory

message: "Isoquants" section talks about Figure 1 which I could not locate. I think there is need for a figure and explanation of the figure. Also removal of the Figure 1.
While we are here, how about separating out section for "Returns to a factor" which is actually covered in last two paragraphs of "Total, average, and marginal product".
--rj 14:51, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  General Improvements 

message: Neither the Input or Output pages linked in the first paragraph have specific definitions in relation to microeconomics (both links have senses under equity theory but its not stated anywhere that this is a topic of microeconomics). Should the relationship be revised or the links removed? 210.211.116.15 03:45, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: specific definitions

message: On 29 October User:Sepsaar did a major expansion of the article. There are several problems with this. First, he removed a lot of valid and helpful material. Second, he replaced it with material drawn from his own publications, which is not a good thing according to Wikipedia rules because this is not supposed to be a publication outlet for summaries of an editor's own previously published material. Third, he put identical content into another article, Productivity; Wikipedia articles are not supposed to duplicate each other.
Fourth, this graph, drawn from one of his publications, is simply wrong in two elementary ways. For one thing, the labels on the curves show that what is measured vertically is average and marginal productivity, but the vertical axis is labeled as real output. They're not the same thing, so the graph is self-contradictory. In addition, there is a range of values of the input for which marginal is above average and yet average is declining; this is impossible. Both of these are such elementary mistakes that they lead me to question whether the Saari papers can be considered as reliable sources for the other things in the current version of the article. 
I would note that the Saari references appear to be non-refereed, which Wikipedia generally considers to be a disqualification from being considered a reliable source. 
I'm going to remove the incorrect graph, and as time permits I'll go through the article and see if other things need to be fixed and whether the Saari references need to be removed as not reliable. Since Saari has a WP:Conflict of interest, I urge him to refrain from participating in this clean-up process. Loraof (talk) 17:53, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major problems with major revision 

message: A few years ago user:Sepsaar added a huge amount of identical content to several articles (this one (Production theory), Production (economics), Production function, and Profit (accounting)). The material here appears word-for-word in Production (economics), so I’m changing this article to redirect there. Loraof (talk) 17:19, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reason for changing to redirect
Talk:List of Konoha Genin

message: "Moegi appears to have a crush on Funan for four reasons cute funny strong and his mysterious past(being orochimaru's son and all" Who is Funan? --Bushido Brown 21:32, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moegi? 

message: Shouldn't Naruto be listed under Chunin because in Episode 103 he told Idate that he passed the Chunin exam and became a Chunin. Of course I could be wrong I'm just saying what naruto told Idate.--Tahu418
:He lied. ~SnapperTo 20:04, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naruto 

message: Is he a genin?or did he promote to chunin in the timeskip?or is he noted only as a missing in(its all very confusing..)
He's not currently a Konoha shinobi, so it doesn't matter for this article. You Can't See Me! 07:39, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sasuke 

message: I doubt that there are this little Genin in Konoha.  Aren't there more mentioned in the manga/anime?  (Not counting the Rookie Nine, as I know 7 of them are Chunin). --Putmalk 00:43, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There aren't that many Konoha genin who get any attention. And of those that do, all but Naruto and Konohamaru's team have been either promoted to chunin or higher already, or left the village. 71.203.209.0 21:30, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Any more Genin 

message: What ever happended to Norman? Why isn't he on this page anymore? --Kid Sonic 09:01, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Norman doesn't exist. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 09:02, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm talking about the middle-aged genin guy. --Kid Sonic 03:24, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed, as he contributes nothing. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 03:33, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where's Norman!? 

message: To clarify, this page currently shows the known Konoha Genin in Shippuden/Part II. None of this has ocurred in America yet, so the question is should we add them here? Or not? 24.7.125.38 06:18, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Japan is more up to date, so we go by what's happened there. ~SnapperTo 06:55, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are we going by Japanese or English Genin here?
Talk:Growth hormone–releasing hormone

message: Tyr-Ala-Asp-Ala-Ile-Phe-Thr
-Asn-
Ser-Tyr-Arg-Lys-Val-Leu
-Gly-
Gln-Leu-Ser-Ala-Arg-Lys-Leu-Leu-Gln-Asp-Ile
-Met-
Ser-Arg
-Gln-Gln-Gly-Glu-Ser-Asn-Gln-Glu-Arg-Gly-Ala-Arg-Ala-Arg-Leu-NH2
Enix150 (talk) 17:15, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Amino acid sequence]] for GHRH

message: We currently have a growth-hormone-releasing hormone (somatocrinin) article  and a somatostatin (growth hormone-inhibiting hormone) article – this should change. 
It should be either:
* somatocrinin and somatostatin
or
* growth-hormone-releasing hormone and growth-hormone-inhibiting hormone
Tony Mach (talk) 10:38, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename article? 

message: Has anyone got a reference for the fact that GHRH is pulsatile? The only one I know of is, but it only shows a couple of hours and the sampling frequency is quite low...
I added the reference in the text, but if someone knows a better one I'd be very happy to know about it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gould80 (talk • contribs) 11:52, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pulsatile secretion? 

message: Perhaps worth a mention:
Brian Hanley's project
KVDP (talk) 13:00, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: GHRH gene therapy

message: The first source cited in the article has a dead link. It's also the most cited one in the article. I think it would be best if it was replaced with a working source. -Pearofapples (talk) 03:13, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the note; I've fixed it. I know nothing about the subject of this article though; it's only on my watchlist due to relatively long-standing vandalism. Graham87 04:02, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  New source needed for dead link 

message: Should there be another content section about any defects related to Growth hormone-releasing hormone for example GHRH deficiency? or any therapies related to this topic?Shania1451 (talk) 03:13, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Growth Hormone-releasing hormone defects
Talk:Eric Crouch

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 15:37, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: first of all how can any one call Eric Crouch a bust?First of all everyone knew he wasn't a legitimate NFL quarterback!he had no arm strength,no accuracy and no clue how to read defenses for the pass.plus he was only a 3rd pick with no position,the rams got what they deserved,especially after trying to make him a wide receiver.He was a great college player in a powerfull system that fit his talents and he hid what was wrong at nebraska after he left.....he was the offense.Bust?No a bad decision on the rams part.No other team would have chosen him that high he would have went in the 6th round or undrafted free agent as a running back or returner.
:The NFL doesnt give short quarterbacks a chance just look at Doug Flutie.--J3wishVulcan 13:14, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That may have been the case in the 1980s when Flutie played college ball, but the game's changed a lot since then. The idea that the NFL doesn't give "short" quarterbacks a chance is a myth. New Orleans' starting QB Drew Brees is 6 feet tall, the same height as Eric Crouch, Jacksonsville's starting QB David Garrard is 6 foot 1 inch, and QB Mark Brunell who was a starter for most of his career is 6 foot 1 inch tall also. Crouch most likely didn't impress the prospective teams at the NFL combine in his physical performance or interviews enough to have them pursue drafting him as a QB, plain and simple.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 214.13.167.252 (talk) 17:34, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Not a forum

message: Why is there so little information about his illustrious college career?  Someone please write about it.
WIZARD826 20:21, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, he DID win the Heisman for Chrissakes! Sundevilesq 15:55, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: College Career

message: "Crouch later received unwanted publicity on TV broadcasts, most notably on ESPN's talk show Pardon the Interruption, where he was criticized by hosts Mike Wilbon and Tony Kornheiser for not wearing a jacket and tie to Matt Leinart's 2004 Heisman trophy award ceremony."
I didn't see this but I'll bet it was an offhand comment by the PTI guys.  Not sure it's noteworthy enough to permanently 0tag Eric with it in his encyclopedia entry.  Also, this makes it sound like it is the foremost of a whole body of on-air criticisms of the guy about his jacket and tie; I doubt that.  Suggest deleting this entire sentence.  Riceman0 (talk) 22:17, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Noteworthy?
Talk:Immortal (Buffy Novel)

message: #redirect Talk:Immortal (Buffy novel)
The information and description was used with permission from the site: Nika Summer's Buffy Library (address = http://www.nika-summers.com/library.php).
Please feel free to accurately add details to the description, continuity and trivia.
Paxomen 03:53, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Carole Kai

message: Missing from the article is any word of Carole Kai's acting career. She featured on shows like "Hawaii Five-0" ( original series ) , "Magnum P.I." and others. ( Just an idea to flesh it out a little. ) 75.104.162.211 (talk) 04:11, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Acting Career?
Talk:James Gregory (mineralogist)

message: "He concluded by saying that any genuine diamonds had most likely been swallowed and excreted by wandering ostriches 'from a far off land'."
Wow! That obviously ridiculous statement has survived for nearly six months. A Google search for "James Gregory" mineralogist returns nothing but Wikipedia mirrors. Is this article completely nonsense? --TantalumTelluride 04:01, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Not nonsence. I quoted from an article in the book "The World's Greatest Mistakes" by Nigel Blundell. --Auric 23:18, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

text: *See also this link: http://abbott-infotech.co.za/hopetown/ --Auric 23:27, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Factual accuracy
Talk:Landmark Baptist Church

message: When I first started on Wikipedia several years ago, there was a title "Landmark Baptist Church". I worked with that, but now I think it is time to change this to a more appropriate title. I think the subject is "Landmarkism". There is really no such thing as THE "Landmark Baptist Church", except for specific congregations that are named that. - Rlvaughn 04:06, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:James Eade

message: It seems that this article has two sections dealing with the same subject.  Surely, as a service to the reader, the two sections can be merged into a unified article. -- Fplay 08:08, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Double article? 
Talk:Landmarkism

message: I see that a substantial article seems to have turned into the present stub. -- 202.124.75.187 (talk) 14:49, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: rather than research the links presented in the text (but not in wikiformat), Novaseminary removed most of the article in Oct 2011, transforming it from an encylopedic source into a narrow stub.--DeknMike (talk) 04:58, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: ...And added good sources, inline citations, etc., insuring that what is in the article is well-sourced, neutral, and not OR. Of course, I and most other WP eds would welcome DeknMike or anyone else "researching the links" and adding material that is well-sourced, relevant, neutral, etc., which is why I added the stub tag, too. Or we could find other eleven-month-old talk page posts by IP editors and use "responses" to those to take pot shots at other editors. I think this article would benefit more from the former, though. Novaseminary (talk) 02:11, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry I wasn't babysitting every single article on Wikipedia that I might possibly want to read someday in the future.  If you have enough time to defend your actions (where did those "good sources" go?), perhaps you have time to contribute some.  I'll do some once I take the considerable effort to learn about the topic.--DeknMike (talk) 00:23, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where did this article go?
Talk:University of Santiago, Chile

message: I want to know about this 169.224.8.185 (talk) 21:34, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Master's study
Talk:Jeffrey Osborne

message: "He is 1/8 Powhaten indian. Was part of the luke and laura theme of the soap opera show."
Can anyone cite a source for this information? The VH1/All Media Guide bio mentions Pequot Indian ancestry. Is this the same as Powhaten?  Also, in what way was he involved with Luke and Laura's Theme? --Lph 04:18, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Does anyone have info on this (unofficial) 1980s NFL theme?  WAVY 10 00:16, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see his song "shine on yesterday"  it is my favourite song by Jeffrey Osbourne...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.86.110.241 (talk) 19:42, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is the NFL song 

message: I removed the line stating that Clay Aiken sang one of his songs on American Idol. A list of singers who have covered various artists' songs on American Idol is already present on the American Idol pages.
Misterultimatum (talk) 05:57, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clay Aiken 
Category talk:Gothic metal albums

message: If this article, or catagory is even going to be in existance, then it needs to have albums that are actually Gothic Metal on it. So far it has one by Lacuna Coil, and thats scraping the barrel. Other albums are nothing to do with Gothic Metal. Leyasu 04:25, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm thinking of cleaning up both this category and the Goth metal one, once they hopefully are renamed as appropriate. -- Parasti 00:50, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mario Ferri

message: The last post seemed like self-promotion to me.  No need for that on Wikipedia.
added stub listing, this article needs to be expanded, minus the PoV. pm_shef 04:05, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

message: *As per agreement, this page and all other Vaughan Councillor pages have been redirected to Vaughan City Council -- pm_shef 00:17, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirected 

message: Just to be clear, I moved this version over the old and merged the history after DGG, myself and EdJohnston reviewed.  The latest version looked good enough to likely pass any AFD, so moving it back into mainspace made sense.  Dennis Brown | 2¢ | WER 18:27, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  History merge
Wikipedia talk:List of userboxes

message: Someone needs to fix Category:User ubx-4, I think this page would get more traffic so I posted it here. There's a bit of extra text which results from wrong language codes or links or something. Not my area of expertise so can someone look at this? Thanks. SandBoxer 20:06, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  User_ubx-4 

message: for i in {a..z} does not list all the boxes. Some start with uppercase letters (User AI, User UN, User Futurama) TCorp 23:25, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I did it realy fast. The problem is that the prefix index special page is buggy, so it would only show userbox template up to "user c*" if search for "user ". →AzaToth 23:35, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I meant the list made using the shell-script. The shell-script should be changed to include uppercase names. TCorp 00:34, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I updated it last. And I managed to do a seperate 0..9 and add it in, but I should have done capaitals too, good note! Ian13ID:540053 17:14, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uppercase  

message: As a new Wikipedia user, I find this list to be extremely unhelpful.  Frankly, a long list of linked articles does not help.  What I need are boxes in front of me and what I need to input to create them.  This page needs a complete overhaul, or to be started over from scratch.
If a better option exists, this article should be deleted. --Tssha 12:20, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This list is at the moment more a help in ongoing cleanup. This because the prefix index is broken so you can't directly search for all templates of userboxes. It was also ment to be a list of all userboxes grouped in their categories, but that has been removed. →AzaToth 13:01, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia:Userboxes is what you want. This is just a self-reference to us more than anything. Ian13ID:540053 17:15, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Newbie Friendlyness and Utility 

message: Whatever method is used to generate this doesn't understand UTF-8. Thus, it corrupts Template:User bodhrán into Template:User_bodhrÃ¡n and so on. Bo Lindbergh 05:49, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken 

message: Can you send userboxes to a Wikia site such as Wookiepedia? Ric36 18:37, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Question 

message: This page was the subject of an MfD discussion closed on 16 June 2006.  The result was Keep. Xoloz 15:27, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Since this was kept, is there any way to get it updated? —Mira 02:55, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I am trying to make contact with a dev who I believe is working on it. Ian¹³/t 09:17, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: MfD Result Notice

message: With the very kind assistance of Interiot, I updated the page today. The new version is however 68 days old (since en doesn't update often on the toolserver). If anyone wants it to be more accurate, they are welcome to download their own copy of the db and run the query supplied on the page itself. Good luck! Ian¹³/t 15:31, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update!
Talk:501(c)(3)

message: Anyone have any interesting stories about going through the 501(c)(3) exemption process?  Wikipedia is a 501(c)(3) organization itself.  They put their exemption letter on the donation page for download http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Deductibility_of_donations --65.26.150.243 04:47, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Hanon Russell

message: *** Readers are cautioned that the article below is highly inaccurate, and written by a person who is far from objective about this subject. Frankly, it seriously damages Wikipedia's credibility that it should be here at all. -- Taylor Kingston, 27 December 2005 *** moved from article by Billbrock 04:51, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: old talk
MediaWiki talk:Sitenotice/Archive 4

message: It will make it look like we're running a fund drive all the time, and so will kill the proper drives. Suicide. Dan100 (Talk) 10:17, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: How about putting it at the bottom. Broken S 16:42, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Bottom?
Talk:Doug Chiang

message: I added a few known links to Chiang on the web. I'll find more soon, such as interviews I've seen around various art communities. --Smell? 05:04, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: External links

message: Does Chiang qualify as a Chinese Americans?  Although it's a political issue, Chiang has never stated that he was Chinese American (as far as I know).  So labeling him Chinese might touch upon the whole "pan-green" and "pan-blue" political issue again.  I believe the best policy is to categorize people from Taiwan that emigrated over to America as Taiwanese-American, unless the person otherwise states so.Removing catergory.  =D  Jumping cheese Contact 21:04, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cat. Issue
Talk:Bakke Mountain

message: This article appears to be a pro-windpower advertisement combined with a family history.  The majority of this information is not NPOV, and is not notable.
The user who wrote the article is User:Tim.bakke, who, based on the username, may be a Bakke family member.  Sections of this article read like a Bakke family history, such as this:
:During World War II, five brothers served in the United States Armed Forces. The brothers' parents emigrated from Bergen, Norway in 1925 with their daughter, Borgny (affectionately nicknamed Bunny), and their sons Oscar, Erving, and Hans. The births of Roald (Roy) and Harold would soon follow in Brooklyn, New York.
What does that have to do with an encyclopedia article about a small mountain in Florida, Massachusetts?
Econrad 05:01, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV dispute 

message: User:38.117.139.110 reverted the NPOV tag without any discussion or improvement to the article.  Please discuss the issue here before removing this tag. Econrad 18:39, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please do not remove NPOV tag without discussion 

message: I'm Being Bold, and taking my best shot at making this article neutral.  As previously noted, this article was essentially a cut-and-paste from The Hoosac Wind official site.   Econrad 04:34, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for your boldness! I am removing the NPOV tag, as your edits have made the article much more neutral. -- Irixman (t) (m) 19:45, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trying to achieve neutrality