lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:United States at the 1984 Summer Olympics

message: What's with the picture of Reagan? I'm sure his role in the olympics was important enough to mention in the article, but should there really be a picture of him? How about a picture of tha athletes or something? The flag's fine, but Reagan's gotta go. — ßottesiηi Tell me what's up 02:37, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Reagan's picture
Talk:Carlos Petroni

message: I'm new to Wikipedia, but I know Carlos Petroni, and, knowing his personality, he obviously wrote this himself to make himself look good. He isn't important, or least not as important as other people in the left that should be added to wikipedia before him. I think the article should be deleted. But, I don't know, I'm new to Wikipedia and you people should decide.
===added POV tag===
I've added a POV neutrality tag at your request while cleaning up this article. JubalHarshaw 14:20, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have no idea how old most of these comments are (possibly all from 2006) and they are all unsigned and in my opinion vandalism. I see no evidence this was written by the subject or is a COI. His notability is clear.  Even underplayed... haha IMO.  Hesperian Nguyen (talk) 00:20, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: POV

message: I've added a POV neutrality tag at your request while cleaning up this article. JubalHarshaw 14:20, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: added POV tag

message: :I have no idea how old most of these comments are (possibly all from 2006) and they are all unsigned and in my opinion vandalism. I see no evidence this was written by the subject or is a COI. His notability is clear.  Even underplayed... haha IMO.  Hesperian Nguyen (talk) 00:20, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Feedback

message: I've tagged the article because, although a lot of references are given, the majority are BY the person the article is about and might therefore be classed as WP:COI. I'm not passing an opinion on it, just tagging it for reference. CultureDrone (talk) 14:08, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  refimprove 

message: I'm currently working on shaping this article up a little and am temporarily removing these permanent links from the refernce page until I can place them properly. Hopefully in the next few days.
* Mi encuentro con Rodolfo Almirón, jefe operativo de la Triple A y su confesión
* La Organizacion Mundial contra la Tortura (OMCT) y la Federacion Internacional de Derechos Humanos hacen saber su preocupacion al gobierno Argentino por Amenazas contra Testigos en casos de Terrorismo de Estado, incluido Carlos Petroni
Hesperian Nguyen (talk) 00:17, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links
Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Indic)

message: I noticed this afternoon that the naming convention for articles with Swami is not consistent, with advocates on both sides. It seems random to me which pages have consensus for which. The meta question being, does it matter to the overall quality of Wikipedia that they're inconsistent? These are the ones I came across casually:
Without Swami:
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Chinmayananda_Saraswati
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Satyananda_Saraswati
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Vishnudevananda_Saraswati
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Chinmayananda_Saraswati
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Sivananda_Saraswati
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Vijnanananda
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Murder_of_Lakshmanananda_Saraswati
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Dayananda_Saraswati
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Swaminarayan (vs. Swaminarayan Swami postfix)
With Swami:
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Swami_Vivekananda/Archive_1#Moving_to_original_page_'Vivekananda'
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swami_Prameyananda
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swami_Smaranananda
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Swami_Bhaskarananda_Saraswati
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Swami_Swahananda
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Swami_Prabhavananda
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Swami_Chidbhavananda
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Swami_Ramanand
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Muktanand_Swami (postfix)
Semitones (talk) 18:22, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Let us remove "Swami" in all the titles. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 19:42, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Swami in article titles 

message: Perhaps I am missing one of core Wikipedia guidelines, but someone could help me with a specific confusion I have. Whereas I see "King" and "Queen" appear before names for Western monarchs, why is "Maharaja" or "Maharani" supposed to be "questioned"? Rustyshackelford (talk) 16:46, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Honorific
Talk:Ted Sannella

message: For future reference. Since one editor thinks some of these don't deserve to be linked, noted here for integrating into the text as inline footnotes. Yellowdesk 03:29, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Archive of External Links 

message: According to Wikipedia:Annotated_article, "See also" is for related Wikipedia articles not already linked elsewhere in the article. Since all of the current "See also" links are already linked elsewhere in the article, I'm removing the "See also" section. Another approach, if someone prefers, would be to restore the "See also" section and then remove the wikilinks that appear elsewhere in the article, but that deprives the reader of links within the flow of the article. --Rich Janis 01:18, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  See also 
Talk:Michael Musmanno

message: His book list is available through loc.gov and bookfinder.com; not sure that level of specificity is required here. A Pennsylvania judge, John Musmanno, is likely a relative but I cannot verify. --Thatnewguy 02:53, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Michael Musmannos family owns some (three, I think?) well-known funeral homes in the McKees Rocks/Stowe Township/Kennedy Township area, perhaps something could be written about that? --Nathan412 03:08, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Funeral Homes in McKees Rocks area? 
Talk:Media Factory

message: Isn't Burst Angel licensed?
Contrary to the introductory paragraph, i'm pretty sure that burst angel got licensed and is being sold across USA and other countries
Yes, and so is Kimi ga Nozomu Eien (to be released as Rumbling Hearts in October 2006). That statement needs to be removed. Done.
School Rumbles page lists it as Studio Comet for the anime and OVA - can someone check that?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.31.40.124 (talk) 09:21, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I want to sell my 1996-1998 original Pokémon card set
DStevens 2601:541:8300:14A0:A5E9:F013:2217:3B26 (talk) 23:31, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  1996-1998 original Pokémon card set
Talk:Metapsychiatry

message: Although the Thomas hora page needs attention, since metapsychiatry is virtually unknown outside of his works, this page should be merged with the content already on that page.Captainktainer 03:07, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

message: This is confirmed in the following endnote in Hora's 1977 book Existential Metapsychiatry "The term [metapsychiatry] was first introduced in the United States by Prof. Stanley Dean of Miami Florida.  However, he is not responsible for any part of the content of this book." 172.92.81.183 (talk) 04:20, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stanley R. Dean M.D., not Thomas Hora M.D., coined the term metapsychiatry.
Talk:Titanic (1996 miniseries)

message: I propose that we remove the stub tab at the bottom of the page- the article seems to be much more than a stub to me. Nwwaew 14:33, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Really a stub? 

message: The real Lorraine Allison was barely two at the time of the sinking.
Just curious - how old did they make her?
PMA 14:35, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lorraine Allison 

message: Added pic to movie info.--BobtheVila (talk) 17:19, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added pic 

message: I would like to make a note of the fact that the ships orchestra, as noted in several books on the subject, was composed of only one cellist, not the two that were shown in the movie,and that the splitting of the ship was not even noted, besides a slow-motion montage of screaming individuals during the sinking. 65.54.154.147 (talk) 02:20, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Ship's orchestra

message: "The film garnered mostly negative and positive reviews from critics": is there a third way? Bob talk 17:59, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Critical reviews" 

message: When you click on the name Kevin Conway here it goes to a page about an actor called Kevin Conway. However that is not the same actor only the same name.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.206.155.74 (talk) 17:15, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kevin Conway
Talk:3B Lab

message: Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (trademarks) and common sense, article titles shouldn't contain untypable characters like ☆'s, even if that is how the band styles their name.  However, I have no idea what a suitable alternative is for this article.  Suggestions?  Dragons flight 03:17, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope. Feel free to do whatever you want with it. ;) —Nightstallion (?) Seen this already? 07:42, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

text: What kind of template? The "technical limitations" one obviously does not apply, as the current name attests. ;) —Nightstallion (?) Seen this already? 08:44, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Fair enough. —Nightstallion (?) 07:34, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Stormontgate

message:  — ßottesiηi Tell me what's up 03:18, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

message: I added refs instead of direct links- the belfast telegraph is no good as a link- they require a subscription.  I left some citeME's in there on the debriefing, the belfast telegraph link, the return of the disks, and the finds at donaldsons home.  will remove the wiki now, but unsure if the current event tag should remain- hes dead and his secrets are in the grave, sinn fein arent telling what they know, and that could be the end of it unless this supposed other source shows up. Fluffy999 22:13, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Derung people

message: I suggest the article to be merged with Taron people since these two groups are identical. Taron are simply Derungs who live in Myanmar. Sgnpkd (talk) 16:05, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Closing, given the sparse evidence of equivalence, and stale discussion with no support. Should more evidence arise, this could certainly be proposed again. Klbrain (talk) 09:55, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Tranz Rail

message: Note inconsistency: "Tranzrail" redirects to Toll NZ, while "Tranz Rail" comes here.
Grahamec 03:18, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Faroe Islanders

message: Logically, there would be Faroese Americans, but I don't know anywhere NEAR enough on this subject to start an article. I wish I did. Gringo300 09:17, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Here goes anyway... Gringo300 05:31, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  There should be some minimum of contents before creating an article. ℚuackor 16:54, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Faroese Americans? 

message: Ásatrú a religion in the Faroes? Excuse me if I sound more than a little skeptical, but this sounds like wishful thinking to me... CatBoris 14:30, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Since no one seems to have any objections, I'm removing the ásatrú bit from the 'religions' section of the infobox CatBoris 10:18, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

text: That's fine. ℚuackor 16:25, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

text: I'd say it's fine to remove. There might be some Ásatruers around, but they're no more than a straw in a haystack. (Sverri) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.25.184.131 (talk) 05:28, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Asatru 

message: The page looks very messy as it is right now. The best would be to add more text to the page, but at the moment, that doesn't seem likely. Perhaps some of the pictures should be removed? CatBoris 12:33, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have now removed them. ℚuackor 18:40, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures 
Talk:The Screamers

message: {
 — ßottesiηi Tell me what's up 03:20, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

message: screamers 
www.screamers.cz
1998 založena v české republuce a rok po zapsana a vystaven registrační certifikát 
Dodnes je prví a jedinou profesionální sdružením herců tohoto oboru  v oboru divadelního zánětu. 86.49.232.241 (talk) 01:42, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poděbradova 779, Nový Bohumín, 735 81 Bohumín, Czechia
Talk:Ricardo Fuller

message:  — ßottesiηi Tell me what's up 03:20, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Friedrich Kohlrausch (physicist)

message:  — ßottesiηi Tell me what's up 03:21, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

message: The external link leads to a 404 error (Page not found), as does the corresponding link in the German article. Can someone correct the URL so the link works, or should we just remove the link?
Dirac66 21:47, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: --Stone 10:20, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I just now added the above reference to the article.  The article, as of right now, has no direct references to specific sources.  It would be good to have some authoritative ones, such as the above. -- Astrochemist 01:45, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: Does anyone know how to pronounce his name, Kohlrausch?
I also wonder if there exists a dedicated article for Kohlrausch's law  in Wikipedia. It is stated in some sites as in http://www.askiitians.com/iit-jee-chemistry/physical-chemistry/Kohlrausch-law.aspx --Email4mobile (talk) 12:03, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name pronunciation
Talk:Komi peoples

message: For dedicated editors of this page: The "Related Groups" info was removed from all  infoboxes. Comments may be left on the Ethnic groups talk page. Ling.Nut 21:07, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "related groups" info removed from infobox
Talk:Fenni

message: I was wondering if we should merge the articles Fenni and Phinnoi with some new content on the Screrefennae of Jordanes, the Scritobini of Paul the Deacon and the Scrithiphini of Procopius. We could use  as a source (with, of course, quotations). We could call it Classical references to the Sami people? What do you think? Please respond here. Harris Morgan 00:58, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: An overview of classical refernces to the Sami would be useful. But I think the question is whether to merge all the articles as suggested above, or to keep the seperate articles (and create new ones) and have a subsection with a short description in Sami history? Perhaps the best way to do this was to add a subsection to Sami history, and then decide whether a seperate article is necessary? Labongo (talk) 13:10, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: OK. I'll start work on it later. What would you recommend I entitle this new section? 'Classical references'? Shall I place it imbetween 'Prehistory' and 'Before 15th century'? Harris Morgan 13:49, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Great. How about 'Early references'? The history article is a mess, but as you suggest after 'Prehistory' is probably best. Labongo (talk) 17:18, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fenni, Phinnoi, (Skritfinni)

message: One version of Tacitus states: "The Venedi have adopted many Sarmatian habits; for their plundering forays take them over all the wooded and mountainous highlands that lie between the Peucini and the Fenni.". To suggest that this means opposite end of the landmass from the the Black Sea to Baltic States/NW Russia is really synthesis. To suggest that Venedi had plundering forays across almost one thousand kilometres of an entire landmass is just not credible. Note that Ptolemy situates the "Phinnoi" as apparently dwelling to the East of the upper Vistula river (SE Poland), this location is closer to the Bastarnae, and Ptolemy does state the "Phinnoi" were once located below the Venedae. This region is also hilly, so it fits with Tacitus. Martintg (talk) 05:44, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Landmass" between the Fenni and Bastarnae
Talk:Japanese pottery and porcelain

message: I think that this claim was derived from a fraud study by a Japanese archeologist. In fact, Japanese pottery, despite being one of the oldest, is only 5,000 years old. (Wikimachine 16:42, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: According to C14 dating of organic matter accompanied with eartenware shard unearthed, "13500(+-1000) years before present"  should  be  thought  the  earlist date of  earthenware in Japan. See   TIME SCALE  in  INTERNATIONAL JOMON CULTURE CONFERENCE --ReijiYamashina (talk) 23:33, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: From 11,000BC

message: What about Marui, Noritake, NGK & Toto? Each one of those makes more than all those in the current section combined.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.54.238.178 (talk) 04:51, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. The article as it stands is exclusively concerned with historically or artistically noteworthy ceramics and has little or nothing on more commercial wares, which are those which the average Western collector is likely to be interested in, like Satsuma ware, Noritake, or Marutomo.  It is like an article on British ceramics which covers 18th century porcelain at great length, but mentions nothing from the 20th century other than Bernard Leach and Lucy Rie.  Maybe this is in line with Wikipedia policy, but it does limit the practical value of the article.109.146.52.248 (talk) 18:36, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: 20th Century to present day

message: Just like in the discussion about the article Geisha, the variety and examples of images are so large, we need to discuss which ones are representative and why they should be included in the article. I have kept images that are National Treasures and also included a new table with one sample image per item, although I am aware it might not be the most representative, but we have to work with what we have in Commons or find better ones. Please put forward your suggestions. Gryffindor (talk) 13:00, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! I have added a couple of more representative images of what was most important for the west, and I suspect Japan also. I wonder if some of these regional wares with one-line stubs and no images really deserve a full entry in the list. It might be better to summarize them below, and expand the important ones. The text is very largely EB 1911 isn't it? Johnbod (talk) 15:32, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 

message: There is a merge proposal (with Japanese wheel throwing) which relates to the this page; please continue the discussion where it started at Talk:Japanese wheel throwing. Klbrain (talk) 06:52, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 22:45, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: Per this edit, the usage of this page was established as . Kindly maintain it consistently, pending a new consensus to the contrary. — LlywelynII 07:28, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:ERA]]

message: — Assignment last updated by Gpeaks (talk) 23:53, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: ARH 371_The TransAtlantic_Cross-Cultural Representations
Talk:USS Lejeune

message: Please note this article is not a DANFS copy, I had to write this one myself as I had several sources with info additional to DANFS. So please don't slap the DANFS tags on it! Gatoclass (talk) 13:52, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: NOT a DANFS article

message: Is the stated figure of 16,662 in fact her displacement, or her gross tonnage?  Kablammo 18:28, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tonnage
Talk:Eochaid ab Rhun

message: Eochaid mac Run would make a better title, in my opinion. Srnec (talk) 00:15, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I personally would prefer that too, but the reliable (as opposed to tertiary trash)-- for instance the Celtic Encyclopedia and Woolf's Picltand to Alba--, call him "Eochaid, son of Rhun". "Eochaid mac Run" yield no results, and only 2 for "Eochaid mac Rhun". The reason for this I'd guess is that though he has a Gaelic forename, his father's name "Rhun" is British. Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 19:14, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eochaid mac Run 
Talk:Cylon Raider

message: I think it'd be a good idea to merge the two articles - neither are very big, after all. DPr77 02:52, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Heavy Raider Merge?

message: Eh, sorry, posted some Viper trivia in the wrong article due to a brainfart.--Raguleader 00:30, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Viper trivia 

message: I've pulled the information from the short Scar article to this one as the article is short and unneccessary.  Pejorative.majeure 01:14, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Image added Canez (talk) 16:53, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scar 

message: I've moved the Notable Individuals from a level 2 subcategory to a level 3 under the Galactica 2003 listing as the two listed individuals are from the 2003 series.  There were no notable  individual raider ships from the original series or Galactica 1980. Pejorative.majeure 01:14, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-organization 

message: It states that the Raiders have nukes. Is this true?--Geracudd 22:10, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They carry nukes in the miniseries, probably just a plot device. Matthew 22:11, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

text: They carry nukes in Razor, so yes, it is true. 70.55.85.95 (talk) 04:48, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nuclear Missiles? 

message: There should be additional info on the Raiders from the flashback First Cylon War, as well as the old Basestar. 70.55.85.95 (talk) 04:49, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Razor 

message: I altered the bit about the events from Six of One and made it into its own category. I think that episode's discussion about the Raiders developing free will is important enough to highlight. If anyone else has any thoughts on this? Canez (talk) 10:45, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Evolution

message: There should be images of the Raiders. Original series, the 1980 AB Raider, the old-style Raider from Razor, and another image besides Scar, since that images focuses on the Scar and not a general look. 76.66.196.229 (talk) 21:46, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: rqimg
Talk:Terre Haute South Vigo High School

message: Please do not put the picture back up supposedly of "South". I have seen the school firsthand, and no aspect of its campus looks anything NEAR that. -- Badlands17 04:28 UTC 23 April 2006
Ok, sorry, I'm not really familiar with the subject in any way.-Hornandsoccer 15:31, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Thomas Hora

message: I'm not sure how to set up a redirect (if regular users can even do that), but this article should be moved to Thomas Hora. Also, it would be great if people could track down sources beyond the PAGL Foundation, as I'm sure that there are more, but I really don't have a lot of time right now; I just wanted to get it off the wikify list and try to deal with copyvio and NPOV issues. Thanks!Captainktainer 03:30, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Percival Street

message: I'm not sure about the discrepancy between Percival and Perceval.  Any furthure information? — HenryLi (Talk) 03:30, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have removed the  tag which proposed that this article be deleted, because I think that this article has merit and so should not be deleted from Wikipedia. I'm leaving this message here as notification. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the  template back to the article as that process is only to be used when there is no opposition. Warden (talk) 23:01, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prod