lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Category talk:Servants of God

message: Bishop Joseph Shanahan, Irish Missionary to Nigeria is not in your list of servants of God.
His course was introduced at Holy Trinity Cathedral Onitsha Nigeria on 15th Dec 1997 by Concelebrated Mass led by Archbishop Albert Obiefuna of Onitsha Archdiocese.
(comments posted by User:172.188.84.178 in main category space, moved here by Ziggurat 03:21, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Nazca culture

message: Could someone tell me why this article is titled "Ica-Nazca" instead of just "Nazca"? I've never seen the two together before, and I'm sure that everyone who comes to this site searches for Nazca, not Ica-Nazca. Could we just make Ica-Nazca a redirect, and Nazca the actual name of the site? LinaInverse 03:22, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: glad to see that the picture was authorized and is still up
I am new to the talk page and cannot find where to ask authors about details, but I noticed info about trepination that I would like to question. Is there new evidence regarding Nasca participation? while doing research a few years ago, I was told that there is only evidence of trepanation among the Paracas, but no evidence in skulls from the Nasca who came after. Can anyone confirm or document?  Many thanks, Kathi kmhuber@gmail.com
--Kmhuber (talk) 18:24, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Orca mitica nasca.jpg Nominated for Deletion

message: I have changed the referencing from Harvard style to inline since most article are now using it. The page numbering  request was a little too pedantic. One ref had what was without doubt a typo. 118.93.64.118 (talk) 01:31, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Harvard to inline refs 

message: This article says the llamas were "exploited." That seems like a loaded term. Maybe "utilized" would be a more neutral term that could replace this. Thoughts? Don Branson (talk) 22:05, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The llamas were exploited? 

message: The intro paragraphs say the the modern Nazca Province was named after the people of this culture.  The statement has no citation.  And it strikes me as very unlikely--far more likely the other way round.  I doubt if we know anything about the language of the Nazca people, or what they called themselves.  If that's so, then they almost certainly didn't call themselves Nazca.  I'm wondering if in fact we named the culture after the modern name of the locale.  Uporządnicki (talk) 16:26, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Province named for the people?  Unlikely
Talk:Softmod

message: There is also what is essentially a softmod for the Wii. It exist within the game The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess Much like other savegame exploits it was found that Twilight Princess could be fooled into running executable code. Perhaps that should be mentioned.--Monsuco (talk) 04:17, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: There is also what is essentially a softmod for the Wii

message: there is also a ps2 softmod, as referenced on the modchip page. If more information could be gathered on that it would make this entry more useful
hmm i dont know but does anyone know if you can get your xbox unbanned from live?
Dappled Sage 05:45, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  ps2 softmod? 

message: Hello, Wiki
I think this should be split-up as soft-modding includes a lot more than what can be sensibly fit on one page..
Just a thought..
:I agree - there's too much, and it's not really getting added, as I certainly am reluctant to make this article yet more ramshackle. Any other comments? 83.104.63.171 (talk) 20:18, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: MRE64 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 203.167.191.132 (talk • contribs) 23:11, 24 Jul 2007 (UTC)

text: I disagree with splitting the article, each example is still a clear case of software-modified hardware. Also, this term is a neologism, being a new and specialized term in a narrow field of study/work. I vote for cleanup over division. -- mordel (talk) 14:29, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

text: Strong Disagree -- per StephenWeber's comments. This article isn't ready for disambig. I'm removing the tag. --Teancum (talk) 13:21, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion - split and disambiguate 

message: * Softmod Depot
JeanLucCoulon (talk) 08:43, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Following link return an error 403 (forbidden) 

message: تعديلات نضام سكوتر شومي 2A02:3035:B13:84B:103C:CD4F:B9D3:68DB (talk) 22:00, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  تعديلات نضام سكوتر
Talk:Supergirls

message: I don't see any reason to delete this article, it seems well written and informative Coronis 02:29, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Supergirls 

message: shouldn't the current incarnation be the main picture? 161.38.222.14 23:43, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  main pic
Talk:The Ghost Breakers

message: Is it alright for me to do a section about how a certain scene in the film has had an impact on Right-wing conservatives? The scene in question is the part where Bob Hope's character compares Zombies to the Democratic party.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Vnisanian2001 (talk • contribs) 23:20, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: In his previous film The Cat and the Canary, Hope made a similar joke about Republicans. View it here. He was an equal-opportunity jokester. It may be funny, but I doubt it's notable enough for its own section. The News Hound 05:50, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Question about scene
Talk:Fairview, Vancouver

message: What was the college in what's now City Square?  Kine Ed campus of VCC, formerly King Ed High School?  It should be mentioned along with any other historical institutions.Skookum1 (talk) 04:30, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: City Square/King Ed

message: I wanted to add about how this was a poor-man's Kitsilano in the '70s (when Kits was just geetting de-hippified) and north of Broadway the houses were those big old CPR timber-frame things; nice porches, big high stoops because of the hillside, by the time I knew it a lot of them covered in bramble, and even cheaper to rent than Kits Poitn was ;-| (which was cheap).  Can't cite that though leaving the reminiscence here, and I won't desribe the party I went to there c.1973....probably a subneighbourhood breakdown would help this article; South False Creek/Granville Island vs Fairview Slope vs Broadway vs "north Shaughnessy" and South Granville (6th-16th); does it include The Circle and Hycroft?Skookum1 (talk) 04:44, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: History

message: This map shows the Fairview line in the '20s - it's the No. 1 route; note the no.2 up to 16th; was going to write up those routes too but didn't want to make the stub too transit-heavy; notable residents, political representation and such would probably help fill out hte article, and things like the Bowmac sign etc.Skookum1 (talk) 04:44, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Map of trolley line

message: Isn't that a term commonly seen nowadays?  Must be citable; means maybe a bit different than Fairview propor, could include from Main to Burrard, but Cambie-Oak seems to be the core meaning.Skookum1 (talk) 04:45, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "Central Broadway"
Talk:Star Wars Rogue Squadron III: Rebel Strike

message: As with Rogue Squadron, much of this article is just lists of levels/gear and plot summary. It's way too much in-universe data for Wikipedia, and should be cut down considerably. However, I've never played this game so am hesitant to go whacking at it. Additionally, the plot summary is all written in past tense when present tense is appropriate for events in fiction. --EEMeltonIV 13:30, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean-up
Talk:Star Wars Rogue Squadron II: Rogue Leader

message: I have been playing this game for a long time now and I am still amazed to its graphics.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.235.171.121 (talk) 15:57, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Awesome Game

message: * 
czar ⨹ 11:51, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ref idea re: remaster
Talk:Multiverse (disambiguation)

message: Someone should add some more info not just a definition and some link's to other sites. I'll try to do so but there is a lot of work ahead.--Eternal Imortal 15:46, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a disambiguation page. We hope you feel less ambiguated. Seriously, though, it isn't meant to be a stand-alone article, as the title isn't enough to distinguish between a number of topics it might cover. Click through to one of the other articles for a better treatment. Zetawoof(ζ) 22:18, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Total lack of informations 

message: What about the Ubuntu multiverse? --Pdedecker 11:25, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ubuntu 

message: I expected to find some through this disambiguation page, but didn't find anything beyond the "standard"'s - cosmologic - one: "DC multiverse is the multiverse used by DC Comics" - sorry, but not really helpful... Can't we have at least a short explanation to all of them like "a collection of universes of the franchise or a set of universes in a fictional piece'? - I mean this only to define fictional multiverses..Danios15 (talk) 21:03, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition of a fictional multiverse
Talk:Roman Catholic Relief Act 1829

message: I would like the know what source this article uses when it speaks of the property qualification being raised, and of Catholics being unable to advise the Sovereign about the appointment of bishops to the C of E.  My reading of the text of the bill did not show up either of these facts. I am not necessarily doubting that these provisions were made, but not by the said Act. What statute, regulation, etc, if any, made these two rules?--Iacobus 04:38, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

message: I'm uncomfortable with the wording about Tony Blair "not being a [Roman] Catholic". It's widely considered, here in the UK, that Blair is Anglican in name only, possibly for political expedience's sake. His wife and children are all Catholic (and his kids are educated at the London Oratory, a grant-maintained Roman Catholic school) and many expect that he will formally convert (from Anglo-Catholic Anglicanism) when he leaves Number 10.
But I can't think of a good way to change the current wording:
Whilst it's strictly true, it's misleading, imho.
Thoughts, anyone? — OwenBlacker 14:29, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Tony Blair]] 

message: When the Act described in this article was passed, it was called the 'Roman Catholic Relief Act 1829', not the 'Catholic Relief Act 1829'.  Shouldn't the title of the article reflect this?  The article for the Roman Catholic Relief Act 1791 uses the original title.
This isn't to say that Catholics should be called Roman Catholics: it's just that it seems sensible to give the act its original title.  The fact that the British Government chose this form of wording gives a valuable insight into the way Catholics were viewed at the time, and helps set the context for the Article as a whole.
Any thoughts?  - Parson's Cat 14:45 12 September 2010 (UTC)
AGREE. Odd that it doesn't.  (sure is a lot of interest in this, isn't there?)WotherspoonSmith (talk) 13:10, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should this page be renamed 'Roman Catholic Relief Act 1829'?
Talk:Juan Vicente Torrealba

message: I am sorry this article is still a long way from being idiomatic English. Morelligu, I suspect that your grasp of English is not really up to the task of re-writing it. That is absolutely nothing to be ashamed of - it is what Wikipedia is all about - you have started the article - now wait for someone else to come along and tidy it up - you might be surprised how quickly it happens. But leave the  tag in place to advertise the fact that you would like help. Also, create a few more links here - what style/s of music does he play? -- RHaworth 04:22, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: babel fish

message: You are right. Someone came along and corrected some of the English. 
Leave requests and comments for this article here. 
ElMosca 18:51, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  I came, I saw, I corrected 
Talk:Kids in the Way

message: this is short
So, I changed the word "incremental" to "instrumental" because I somehow doubt that Audio Adrenaline incrementally influenced Kids in the Way to be signed to their own label. Call me crazy. CombatRaven 17:49, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hi,
im the member langhaarschneider of the german wikipedia - but i don't want to create an account here just for this question...
I read in the german christian music magazine sound7.de that KITW aren't any longer a band (http://www.sound7.de/article.php?channel=2&article=4978) - does anyone of you know more about that? I can't find informations about that anywhere else in the web...
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer:Langhaarschneider --88.64.136.154 06:48, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They are still active, they just released a new album, "A Love Hate Masquerade." IronCrow 23:32, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Kids in the way quit?

message: How could they make a video for the love and hate song Fiction if they broke up before the album came out?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.161.162.94 (talk) 01:37, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Confusing?

message: Info here is kinda lacking, empty. No good history content. EmGaGa (talk) 13:11, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Lacking info
Talk:List of soil scientists

message: * Konstantin Dmitrievich Glinka (1867-1927).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ivtorov (talk • contribs) 20:52, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Konstantin Glinka 

message: Sure, these may be Estonian soil scientists, and notable at that, but maybe not too and the editor did not provide us with any info to help us decide. PBarak (talk) 21:08, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Three Estonian soil scientists w/o wikipages or cited works, suddenly appear on this list
Talk:Dark Page

message: Does anyone know what the breed of dog that the Trois had in this episode? --Gvsualan 00:44, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Breed of Dog

message: Unless I'm missing something, I don't think this episode features a shot of the bridge.  Lots of shots of the Observation Deck, but that's not the bridge. It's simply something else on deck 1.
Can we add Dark Page to the list of episodes without the Bridge?
I agree that we can; I watched it three days ago and have no memory of the bridge being shown. I'll add it immediately. Zeck 11:43, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Shot of the Bridge 

message: Wouldn't this fall under the same heading as 'Goofs'? I don't even understand the oddity. Surely there were plenty of Betazaoid Starfleet officers who could have made first contact with these aliens...
And the repeated listings of Kirsten Dunst confuse me, surely we only need one.
Lots42 09:00, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oddities?  

message: Is the production code 707 or 259? I'm gonna research this - perhaps Memory Alpha will bear some clarification. Alex 15:30, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Production code 

message: The episode does not explicitly say that Kestra Troi drowned, though online Star Trek material confirms that is what occurred. I think the episode intentionally omitted the cause of her death. In fact, it shows images of a wolf through out the episode, possibly implying a wolf attack. 
14:02, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Drowning
Talk:Ford Proving Grounds

message: When I originally created this page, I neglected to imagine expanding on any other proving grounds in the Ford realm (to which there are more). 
So on a recommendation, I was asked to discuss a name change on the Talk page of Ford Proving Grounds to discuss a general name change to the Arizona Proving Grounds (Ford) or Ford Motor Company - Arizona Proving Grounds. This would allow to keep a naming convention if the need or want ever to arise.
Ultimately they would in turn be linked to a master page, i.e. Ford Proving Grounds to provide a general overview and basic information about that company’s locations. If the reader would like more specific information about a particular site ? Then they would be able to click on a link to that specific site.--LSX 04:42, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that's a good idea, but be sure to create a disambiguation page as you rename this page. But also consider that articles should be of a certain length in order to be justified. It depends on how much data there is for the Ford Proving Grounds. Since the article is relively small as of this moment it is probably best to keep the current title and add to the stub. As more and more data becomes available the Ford Proving Grounds article could be turned into a disambigation page linking to the article for each for the Ford Proving Grounds. Thanks. Regards, Signaturebrendel 05:06, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The official name of the place originally under the "Ford Proving Grounds" article banner is Arizona Proving Ground or "APG", in Yucca.  But Ford acquired a second Arizona Proving Ground from Volvo, located northwest of Phoenix, referred to as "VAPG".  In Michigan, there is a Michigan Proving Ground (MPG) in Romeo (north of Detroit), and Dearborn Proving Ground (DPG) which has since been renamed Dearborn Development Center (DDC).  There was also a Florida Evaluation Center (FEC), and Ford operates test facilities near Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan, Thompson, Manitoba, and other locations up north for cold weather testing.  Some of these test sites have been officially "closed" in terms of full time operations, but may still get some testing traffic as needs arise.  I'll assemble some more details on the separate sites when I get a chance.  --T-dot 09:19, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Rather than set up separate pages with short articles on each of Ford's several Proving Ground - I recommend leaving the Title of this page as is, and adding separate sections for each named facility.   I have started to restructure the main article to reflect that. --T-dot 11:35, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name Change Proposal

message: Unless anyone disagress I think that there should be some organization to the article etiher by continent or by Sub Manufacturer (Ie. Volvo , Mazda ).
By continent I think would be easier. LSX 18:48, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: New Topic

message: Here's a PR summary of FPGs around the world: http://media.ford.com/article_display.cfm?article_id=834
Greglocock 22:58, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Media Release
Talk:Linimo

message: Much of the article's data was mined from the Japanese version, which unfortunately does not cite its sources. Jpatokal 04:50, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Detailed information on the Linimo in English is a little sparse.  

message: Does the Linimo use electrodynamic or electromagnetic suspension? 31.18.249.107 (talk) 04:22, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  EDS or EMS? 

message: The lede points out that the media uses the term "unmanned" and "automated" interchangeably, but although (supposedly) there is a difference, the contributing editor did not explain what the difference is, which one applies to the Linimo trains, or which one are the three relevant trains that pre-date Linimo. It seems like a poorly thought out drive-by contribution. Can anyone expand on this point in the body of the text? - Boneyard90 (talk) 18:45, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unmanned vs. Automated
Talk:Nitobe Memorial Garden

message: I have noticed that this article and this webpage are almost identical; i'm not sure which was copied from which, but am making a note here and putting a template on the article in the hope that someone with more copyright nous than i will be able to decide if this is kosher or not. Happy days ~ LindsayHello 19:30, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The website says it's from Wikipedia. This revision predates the 2015 post at NAJGA, making this a backwards copy. Thank you for asking :) MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 23:34, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Ha!  Can't believe i missed that.  In that case, and this is what first caught mine attention, we can't use it as a reference, WP:CIRCULAR, so i'll take care of that now.  Thanks for looking into that and catching my blindness :) Happy days ~ LindsayHello 12:09, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright
Talk:Dinosaur Gardens

message: I have a bunch of CC-licensed photos of Dinosaur Gardens here. I'm not the best judge of my own photography so I'm not sure what would be best to add, but please feel free to grab one or more and add them to this article. —Chowbok 04:51, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Great pics!  I think the "Big dinosaur fight" and the Jesus sculpture would look good - they're two of the most memorable images.  Thanks for dropping by -- this page really needed a picture or two! Zagalejo 16:31, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Check out your talk page.  We might need your help to get these pictures up. Zagalejo 13:56, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Constitutional right

message: This article is inaccurate. The 26th Amendment does not establish a "Right to Vote" that cannot be denied to persons. A better example of a constitutional right in the US would be the right to confront witnesses (See Confrontation Clause). I am going to change the article to reflect this. takethemud 04:54, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Inaccurate

message: This article is either horribly US-centric or should make it clear that it's talking exclusively about the United States. Moulder 07:01, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this term US-specific? 

message: Rights are not granted by the constitution.  Rights are protected.  If a thing is granted it is a privledge, not a right.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.167.19.170 (talk • contribs) 04:27, December 8, 2006 (UTC)
:Marked disputed...71.196.246.113 (talk) 15:42, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: This is such a US-specific view of this subject. Nobody else thinks like this. In every practical sense of the word, rights are granted, not just "protected". What is and is not considered a right depends on culture and the surrounding circumstances, i.e. what society deems to be a right. 150 years ago, nobody considered female suffrage to be a right. That right was then granted by subsequent legislation. Right now, some countries consider assisted suicide to be a right, whereas other countries don't. Right now, some countries consider smoking cannabis to be a right, others don't. Rights being "protected, not granted" is a nice philosophical idea, don't get me wrong, but this view has no practictal relevance at all and in every pragmatic sense rights are granted by legislation, not just protected. Abwehrkraft (talk) 22:46, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong Wrong Wrong 

message: See above comments too. --NYScholar (talk) 19:19, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Added template due to lack of sources throughout

message: Someone needs to decide whether this article is about "constitutional" or "inalienable" rights; i.e. whether it is about rights "merely" guaranteed by a constitution, or about rights asserted to be absolutely inherent to a person's status as a human being.  Andrew Gwilliam (talk) 17:11, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scope of this article
Talk:Cosima De Vito

message: I for one cannot really understand what this dispute is about, and frankly don't really care.  I do care about ongoing insinuations of slander though.  As the article is at the moment , it seems to me to be reasonably neutral.  If people have futher issues with its neutrality, please discuss it here first by submitting what you propose is a better wording, together with factual references, otherwise I will revert your edit. 
Please also sign your edits as per above note. -- I@n ≡ talk 05:41, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: POV dispute