Talk:Laws of Form

message: Can someone please take the italicized abbreviation "pa" used in the main article and expand it into either italicized "primary algebra" or "primary arithmetic" ("pa" is also informally "father") as appropriate?  I feel unqualified to do this expansion myself at the present.  This abbreviation seems to me to make this wonderful article much less fluent by means of the resulting unfortunate triple collision.  Thanks, 97.76.197.20 (talk) 15:36, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've expanded every occurrence (many) of the abbreviation "pa" to "primary algebra", and (3) of the abbreviation "PA" to "primary arithmetic".  Does this improve the article?  I hope so.  yoyo (talk) 16:26, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

text: True, but only once, and in caps: "PA".  Easily fixed - I'll remove it.  yoyo (talk) 15:46, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.  yoyo (talk) 15:51, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Request

message: >>The mathematics fills only about 55pp and is rather elementary....
>>The entire book is written in an operational way, giving instructions to the reader instead of telling him what is. In accordance with G. S. Browns interest in paradoxes, the only sentence that makes a statement that something is, is the statement, which says no such statements are used in this book.
After reading over the book for like 10 minutes, this whole paragraph seems completely wrong. The word "be" appears frequently and the book consists more or less ONLY of mathematical logic.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.89.79.41 (talk) 08:30, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong information? 

message: http://www.canterbury.ac.nz/spark/Researcher.aspx?researcherid=84894  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Noeon (talk • contribs) 09:48, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Japanese, actually. Something about oysters. In any case, both of the above links have been replaced in the article with links to the Wayback Machine. I didn't attempt any more extensive update.  —jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 05:30, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Invalid Links 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Laws of Form. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060821204917/http://lawsofform.org/aum/session1.html to http://www.lawsofform.org/aum/session1.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:58, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This section was tagged as WP:OR since 2011. All the claimed "resonances" are from sources predating publication of LoF. If you can provide reliable sources that explicitly make the connection between one or more of the religious texts and LoF, then by all means, provide it. But as long as the references aren't on hand, Wikipedia policy is clear: "Any material lacking a reliable source directly supporting it may be removed and should not be restored without an inline citation to a reliable source" (my emphasis). Paradoctor (talk) 10:38, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The "Resonances in religion, philosophy, and science" section