Talk:Ragnarok Online/Archive 1

message: Seems like people got some wrong informations. Kunlun is based on Taiwan, not China. I changed that. The fatal error is Umbala. Umbala is not part of Global project. The gobla projects are Amatsu, Kunlun, Louyang, and Ayothaya. Louyang is the third of the global project, not Umbala.
:: Feel free to make changes. If are incorrect informations, you can correct it. --Mateusc 19:21, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cities 

message: Well, now with Poring and Jellopy articles we really needs Category:Ragnarok Online. I'm too worried if someone resolves build a database here. Something seemed already was attemped with Pokedex and many RPG games and didn't obtained good reception of the community. An predefinition/more notable link for Ragnaguide would be better. --Mateusc 19:20, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category... 

message: In http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ragnarok_Online&diff=30213686&oldid=30060223 it shows that 219.90.67.213 removed the entire "Conduct" section. Is this vandalism? (Dec 8)
I am re-adding the Conduct section since there seems to be no good reason to remove it. 66.92.144.74 13:16, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing information from Conduct 

message: I've added a small item about defence in the WoE section, But I'm not sure if the dmg is first reduced from equips and then from vit as I wrote or if it's the opposite. Could I have some help there? Raquel Sama 16:41, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Defence 

message: Is this really needed? It makes this seem more like a strategy guide rather then a encyclopedia entry... not to mention some stats suggestions are wrong (for example, falconer hunters normally have INT, as it increases damage increased by the falcon). - 72.59.54.13 04:37, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested Stats? 

message: I can nee that most of WoE section was deleted. Was that vandalism? Raquel Sama 18:15, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: War of Emperium

message: I think towns should be moved into one article for all of them. They really aren't that important to have seperate articles about... - Stoph 04:21, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. I just put a merge proposal up, but I think it may make the main article too cluttered. The same should apply to items, creatures, etc. Deckiller 01:43, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Towns 

message: How is there no section or even mention in the article of how much the game costs to play? 66.131.51.64 20:33, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cost? 

message: I've added the ninja and gunslinger section, I've added the main stuff but I still need help improving it. Raquel Sama 21:07, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ninja and Gunslinger 

message: For the article to look nice,i suggest professionals upload at least 5 screenshots.its based on good display and helps people get a better printable version of this article,which i think is marvellous.In that case,3 more pics rather than the 2 is better?Well that leads to people who wants to help.Thanks for letting me give out my opinion - sniperz March 25,2006
Hm... yeah, article is in serious need of pics. I'll add some Raquel Sama 22:54, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  More Ragnarok Online Screenshots 

message: Do you think ragnarok could be the article of the day? it would be nice Raquel Sama 22:10, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  article of the day 

message: Why don't we swap that private server Crusader picture with an official Ragnarok one? A lineup of all the 2-2 classes would look better then an ugly one like that. <_< Keero 23:28, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Nothing wrong ith Prontera image, nothing of Private server is for illustration pourposes, ok?--Ragnarok Addict 10:05, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Please, stop with this stupid private server statement. It is Prontera, the article is well illustrated. I uploaded image first and is Screenshot in-game fully fair use compilant. Your image violates the iRO Website Copyright: has no HUDs and no authorization for you publish here. --Ragnarok Addict 00:06, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove the Crusader picture? 

message: Sakray is more like a definition than something needing its own article. Only separate again if there's enough content to make it worth. --ren 03:27, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sakray merge 

message: * Tristan Kingdom
* The History of Munak
* The Turtles Island
* Iggdrasil Tree
--Ragnarok Addict 20:58, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  History - To do 

message: Why do you insist on putting the image up again and again? It's not official, you can't have wings, no one sells Balmungs, and it's not a real representation of what the real RO's look like. I say we have both the official, and the private one, but the private one moved down towards private section, and just add that it's a glimpse of what a P. Server looks like. =/ Keero 13:17, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  In kRO you can yes, have wings. And what's a problem with Private server? People that are reading Wikipedia wants know what Prontera looks like, they doesn't care if are wings in official servers or not. This is a reality, million of people plays in Private servers. They have the same Prontera from Official Servers. My image shows the architeture of the houses, the street, the merchants and your image show only merchants covering all parts of the image. Another thing: do not delete link for OpenKore, VisualKore and modKorearticles. The fact that you doesnt like doesn't mean Wikipedia can't publish. --Ragnarok Addict 00:10, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Be more open minded... private servers are a reality, no need to hide them... if forbidden things weren't supposed to be on wikipedia, why is there an article for pedophilia, lol? Raquel Sama 00:37, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

text:  I agree. Information can be bad depeding of their bias and private server screenshot has nothing wrong IMHO. For good reasons, it shows the reality of 50% of Ragnarok gaming around the world. --Ragnarok Addict 16:03, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prontera screenshot 

message: Since we are at 41kb, we should remove pieces or make some changes. Input would be appreciated.
*A) Make a town article with just the main towns in this article. 
*B) Remove the stats section and just add a very small description of each stat underneath the game Basics in bulleted fashion. 
*C) Merge both Basics and Level and Class together. 
*D) Slim down the Conduct section some.
*E) Clean up the community links. (I'll get to that later though. Relisting in bulleted fashion.)
Keero 06:00, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think is already fine. If you see articles such as World of Warcraft you will complain that simply Kbyte size is not determinant factor to slim/cut the article. --Ragnarok Addict 16:04, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, don't mess it up Raquel Sama 00:03, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Downsize? 

message: Who removed the info on Taekwon, Star Gladiator and Soul Linker? Please put it back up. - Luminarie 00:45, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  TaeKwon Class 

message: Leading a multitude of monsters to another player, to allow them to cast an area spell and destroy the group of monsters, known as mob-training
I find this point ridiculous. If there are no comments withing, say, 2-4 weeks, I will likely remove this from the article. --Ashanthalas 23:25, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "mob-training" an offense?...

message: BRING BACK STATS. THAT WAS INFORMATIVE AND HELPFUL. SUM OF HUMAN KNOWLEDGE MY DICK.
:It may be infomative and helpful, but it doesn't belong here. If you really need those stats you may try searching in the article's previous versions (accessible by clicking "history" tab on the top of the page when using default theme) .--Kakurady 10:58, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  STATS 

message: There are however, a few long running servers that have been known to last, and these just show what Gravity COULD have accomplished if they had bothered to put in any real effort. Comparison of such servers and Gravity's can be likened to comparing a genuine product to a exceptionally poor knockoff of said product in terms of quality. The irony being that the knockoff has better quality than the original.
Above statement bias towards gravity and utterly bashing them. remove.
:I reverted all edits by Question2 while I was at it. Incredibly POV, but there may have been one or two useful paragraphs. Feel free to check the history and work with them if possible. --R. Wolff 10:34, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, because describing gameplay conditions, advantages and disadvantages of a game is a reviewer's job and belongs in a review, not in what is supposed to be an encyclopedia article. --R. Wolff 08:12, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  bias on an encyclopedia??? Omg thats wrong