Talk:David Ervine

message: We cant report this withoput a verifiable source, SqueakBox 21:08, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: We need to keep he is alive until we can confirm otherwise, if there are doubts we musnt make a mistake or end up with egg over our faces, SqueakBox 21:22, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for that, SqueakBox 21:24, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

text: It seems he had a heart attack, a stroke and a brain haemorrhage. Frainc 16:33 8 January 2007
No doubts now, SqueakBox 20:24, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Death

message: Should there be a section on his involvement in the supposed loyalist ceasefire? Frainc 16:41 8 January 2007
Of curse, SqueakBox 20:24, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ceasefire

message: David Ervine had more courage, passion, heart and integrity tempered by fairness than all the mainstream politicians in the North. It was a very moving experience to hear him passionately defend his community without feeling the need to hate the 'other'.  For that alone, David Ervine was a breath of fresh air. Go ndéana Dia trócaire ar a anam dílis. 89.100.195.42 15:36, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: For what its worth (since someone has aired their views), I consider him to be exactly what he was: the head of the political wing of a terrorist organisation. That kinda takes some of the 'heart' and 'fairness' away, and certainly adds to the feeling one has that he most certainly hated. --Mal 01:27, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  No I agree with the first person.He may have been in the UVF when he was young (and he only joined after Bloody Friday) and without him there might have been no loyalist ceasefire. And he wasn't head of the UVF. Dermo69 20:17, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Breath of fresh air

message: The article has been fully protected against revert warring per the request on WP:RPP, until the results of the ongoing RfC is concluded. I've left the contentious link in so the RfC folks can review it & it appears to be the most 'agreed upon' revision. I think this is the fairest approach - Alison☺ 02:40, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks Allison. This prevents edit war during RFC so an agreed upon revision can be reached. WooyiTalk, Editor review 02:44, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article protection 

message: :Image:Ervine d.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 06:19, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Ervine d.jpg

message: The lead needs to be expanded with a summary of the article's main points.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 18:51, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Lead

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on David Ervine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070202034106/http://www.independentmonitoringcommission.org to http://www.independentmonitoringcommission.org
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:01, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on David Ervine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060926051102/http://www.niassembly.gov.uk/record/reports/010410.htm to http://www.niassembly.gov.uk/record/reports/010410.htm
*Added  tag to http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/article2138120.ece
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:10, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on David Ervine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070114213427/http://u.tv/newsroom/indepth.asp?id=79239&pt=n to http://u.tv/newsroom/indepth.asp?id=79239&pt=n
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:18, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on David Ervine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060926045216/http://www.niassembly.gov.uk/record/reports/000704.htm to http://www.niassembly.gov.uk/record/reports/000704.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060926043902/http://www.niassembly.gov.uk/record/reports/011008.htm to http://www.niassembly.gov.uk/record/reports/011008.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:36, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified