Talk:Chris Jacobs (politician)

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Chris Jacobs (politician). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070813060748/http://www.dos.state.ny.us/pres/pr2006/confirmed5206.htm to http://www.dos.state.ny.us/pres/pr2006/confirmed5206.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:10, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I see a bunch of names and dates in the infobox, many of which are not present in the body of the article. Not sure what the sources of these names and dates are. Anyone? 24.29.56.240 (talk) 06:10, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox 

message: I have restored, again, CharlesShirley's removal of reliably sourced content that is neutral and WP:DUE and I'm correcting my mispoken edit summary. The sources clearly say that he voted against the certification and that his actions and comments helped spur the riots. CUPIDICAE💕 18:51, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed the synthesis information again. But on this talk page, you just made a claim again, without providing evidence. You did not provide a reliable source to support your addition. The Verge's headline is the only thing close to supporting your claim, but that is just one source and it is not a reliable source. The NY Times article does not say it and the WIVB article does not say it. You have not provided a reliable source to support your claim. See: Wikipedia:SYNTHESIS. Above you claim, without evidence, that Jacobs' vote against certification "helped spur the riots". Where does it say that in the NY Times article? Where does it say that in the WIVB article? Once again, one headline from an "American left-wing technology news website operated by Vox Media" cannot support your synthesis. - CharlesShirley (talk) 20:16, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, if you read the Verge article (not a reliable source), the article flat out states that Jacobs' vote came after the attack on the capitol. His vote could not "spur" the morons into action if the vote happened after the attack. It just can't. So all you have provided is a headline to an article from an obscure left-wing website and the body of the article contradicts its own headline. You have not provided a reliable source. There is no there there. - CharlesShirley (talk) 20:33, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  First, it's not my synthesis, second, you're wrong about bias - a biased source doesn't make it unreliable. Go ahead and read up on that before you continue your egregious POV pushing. CUPIDICAE💕 20:42, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, so you see that it is synthesis. It might not be your original idea. But it is synthesis.  Where is the reliable source? One headline is all you have provided and the underlying article contradicts the headline. Why are you POV pushing? There are no reliable sources that support your POV but you want to put the POV in the article anyway. Why are you POV pushing? - CharlesShirley (talk) 20:45, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of Capitol information 

message: Article had him tagged under Jewish members of Congress, but I see no sources that he is Jewish. As such, I removed it. Pennsylvania2 (talk) 02:50, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Jewish