lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Canine discoid lupus erythematosus

message: This article should be about more than just dogs. This is the name for a general condition that also occurs in humans.
:There is a bit about discoid lupus in humans in the lupus erythematosus article, as the header at the top of this article indicates.  If you want, please add to this article about the human aspects of DLE.  --Joelmills 17:46, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that the present version of this article is a bit confusing because it does not make explicitly clear when it is speaking of the disease in the context of humans and other animals.--Betamod 20:50, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I went ahead and moved it to Canine discoid lupus erythematosus, to remove any confusion.  --Joelmills 21:34, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Aerojet M-1

message: I recently took a photo of the M-1 and have added it to the article.
It is interesting to note that the SVG 'scale' drawing is much larger than the actual engine in the photo. I'm assuming that the nozzle extension must have been very large in the diagram depicted, but absent in the museum display.
As you can see from the thumbnails added on the right, these two depictions are quite different.
I will leave the page as is for comment. 
-Kyle(talk) 06:35, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent M-1 Image

message: According to F-1, the F-1A rocket produced over 2 million lb-f thrust, more than the M-1. Also this article would make it appear that since no hydrogen pumps were tested, no M-1 was ever completed, whereas the F-1A would appear to have been completed but never flown.
74.134.236.69 06:41, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well the article does state that it was the largest hydrogen engine built. It also says it was more powerful than the F-1. It does not link the two however, there is no claim that it was the most powerful engine of any sort, which is what you seem to be suggesting here? Maury 13:52, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I agree with anonymous IP.  I am changing "built" to something like "component tested” per the original comment... it's clearly spelled out in the cited final report on page 11. The term "built" is very misleading out of context.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Auroranaut (talk • contribs) 03:40, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

text: I don't mean to highjack these comments but while going over the F-1 and M-1 today I found a problem with the claim for the "most powerful ..." engine ... The problem is that the F-1A as tested is given with a sea level thrust of 8 MN and the M-1 as component tested is also given with a sea level thrust of "8 million N" (why nor use 8 MN ?). So they apear equal at that point. It is not clear if the later "uprating" of the M-1 design (unfortunately now given in unscientifical "million pounds force") has been covered by any component tests. If these developments were "only" on paper then they should not enter into a competition because for sure there were all kinds of giants on paper in east and west. While barely accepting "component tested" as enough, a pure design on paper could never compete (my personal opinion of course). So can anybody claim that designs above 8 MN were completely "component tested" ? JB --92.195.35.26 (talk) 18:11, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  The 6.67-8 MN figure is for the M-1 running in vacuum, not sea level. See http://www.astronautix.com/m/m-1.html Kaleja (talk) 23:05, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Comparison with F-1
Talk:The New Biographical Dictionary of Film

message: I believe this article would benefit from a list of editions of the book that would give a good overview of its development. Thomas Tvileren (talk) 11:08, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Add a list of editions?
Talk:Market structure

message: no need keep it as it is
:I've merged market form with this. Google indicates "market structure" is the prevailing term. Johnleemk | Talk 11:02, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger

message: The introductory sentence of this article is unclear - It states the name of the article, but does not describe it. After this header, the article jumps headlong into a list of concepts, with no obvious connection to the list items and the article. Will whoever edited this article in this way please clarify themselves?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaiboom (talk • contribs) 17:54, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Unclear Header

message: Dr. Colciago has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:
We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.
We believe Dr. Colciago has expertise on the topic of this article, since he has published relevant scholarly research:
*Reference : Andrea Colciago & Lorenza Rossi, 2013. "Firm Entry, Endogenous Markups and the Dynamics of the Labor Share of Income," DNB Working Papers 367, Netherlands Central Bank, Research Department.
ExpertIdeasBot (talk) 20:03, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dr. Colciago's comment on this article 

message: Dr. Etro has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:
We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.
We believe Dr. Etro has expertise on the topic of this article, since he has published relevant scholarly research:
*Reference : Federico Etro & Dirk Czarnitzki & Kornelius Kraft, 2011. "Endogenous Market Structures and Innovation by Leaders: an Empirical Test," Working Papers 2011_04, Department of Economics, University of Venice "Ca' Foscari".
ExpertIdeasBot (talk) 20:17, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dr. Etro's comment on this article
Talk:Minilab

message: This seems to be a description of the one-hour photolab business, and not the piece of equipment that is central to this business.  I suggest changing this page to describe the equipment, and less the operation.  Discussion?
Cranialsodomy 07:10, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

message: If "no computer is present" in that picture then what are all of the buttons and display screens doing? I think you mean to say that the image itself is not digitized during the process and the machine performs a purely optical-analog development process - but clearly there is something that meets the definition of a computer controlling the various electronics. Predestiprestidigitation (talk) 09:36, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Caption
Talk:Personal injury

message: Why is "Ambulance chaser" redirected here?
:It certainly seems like it shouldn't.IMFromKathlene 22:33, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't know, but the term is in Wiktionary: http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/ambulance_chaser I don't suppose we can redirect it to Wiktionary? But does it need an article all to itself? Softlavender (talk) 01:40, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In some juridictions, the expression 'personal injuries' seems to have been held to include damage to a person's reputation. See this link:  (I am not familiar with the source). Someone has mentioned this at the start of the page 'injury'. James500 (talk) 17:42, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Defamation]]
Talk:Karula Parish

message: Karula Parish covers a wider area than the Karula commune and therefore the redirection is not very adequate. Ohpuu 07:22, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I am not sure what means Karula Commune. Ideas? Maybe we just delete redirect Karula Commune?--Estopedist1 (talk) 13:18, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  Vald = commune (current rural municipality, boundaries shift with administrative reforms and amalgamations of municipalities); kihelkond = parish (ecclesiastical and ethnographic area, boundaries fixed in about 1920, when these ceased to be administrative units). I have no idea why some sources in English have started to use parish as a translation for rural municipality, whereas the consensus used to be to use commune for rural municipality. In a lot of cases, this causes no confusion but the former Karula parish vs Karula commune is one case where it might. -- Ohpuu (talk) 08:02, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Karula Parish vs Karula commune
Talk:Timeline of Minamata disease

message: I'm wondering whether the references to the "Minamata River" should actually say "Mizumata River".  I'm not seeing a Minamata River on Google Maps in or around Minamata Bay (I'm not seeing a Minamata River anywhere in the world, actually, when I search for it).  I'm only seeing the Yude, Mizumata, Sakai, Fukuro, Kotsunagi, Tsunagi, etc.
Can I get some other opinions on this?
Thanks, V3getar1anCarr0t (talk) 02:26, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minamata River - Does it Exist?
Talk:Rosetta Stone (band)

message: When I originally wrote the Albums/Compliations section, I planned it to hold only those album and compliations entirely released by the band. However, a kind soul has added "A Gothic-Industrial Tribute to The Smashing Pumpkins" which does indeed feature Rosetta doing a cover, along with many other acts. I'll therefore be splitting the section into Albums (to include compliations of entirely Rosetta material) and Compliations (to include any compilation of multiple bands in which Rosetta features). However my knowledge of the compliations the have featured in is skant, and extends only as far as knowing that there are plenty. Andrew Oakley 12:00, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Compliations 

message: I have removed non-verifiable speculative comment on causative factors contributing to  Rosetta's disbanding, as it is unreferenced hearsay and indeed does not adhere to Wikipedia biography of living people's policy. 
Time of Porl's finger accident narrowed down to late 1997 as it was a few weeks/days prior to their 1997 Birmingham Christmas gig but have yet to be able to confirm the exact date - "some point in the late 1990's" did however not appear to be of any help at all. Confirmation to it's affect on Porl's guitar playing style I cannot comment on, as I was not aware that it had any great significance, citation or verification would be useful if this was the case.
Godgirl 23:53, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits to history 

message: Have reviewed the history section with reference to their known discography and added context by including pre-1991 history, context of US Cleopatra Records releases, further releases and Karl North's current status. Checking official discography times based on available online second hand copies of deleted and no longer available albums have clarified release date of albums, esp gENDER cONFUSION, summarised final year of activity, and edited minor grammatical points including the past tense of the status of the band.
Godgirl 06:17, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further edits 

message: Rosetta Stone appears on the "Nirvana's punk tribute" playing "Territorial pissings", with bands like: Total Chaos, Dee Dee Ramone, Agent Orange and many more. Released in Argentina in 2006.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.254.53.95 (talk) 20:42, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  rosetta stone in tribute album 

message: The Stepsisters of Mercy  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.62.108.8 (talk) 18:59, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  AKA 

message: I've given the page a reasonably thorough overhaul in light of the new 2019 album. Can someone closer to the Miserylab material also update that page, please? The new Rosetta album contains a lot of reworked Miserylab stuff. Cheers Andrew Oakley (talk) 20:52, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  2019 new album
Talk:Frank Launder

message: Dreadful grammar, horrible syntax ... just awful.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.103.111.118 (talk) 20:50, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Horribly amateurish article
Talk:Godspell (film)

message: Please, when creating new film articles, see naming conventions: Wikipedia:WikiProject_Films/Style_guidelines. Hoverfish 07:57, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

message: Why not Gospel?
99.184.221.249 (talk) 13:59, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Why is it God-Spell

message: Some of the parables, such as the Prodigal Son, Lazarus and the rich man, and the Good Samaritan, appear in Luke, not Matthew, but the by-line of the movie says the show is based on the Gospel of Matthew.  Nutster 17:24, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Trivia]] 
Talk:Cat Bells

message: Both versions are used in the article as it stands. For the sake of consistency, would a single version be preferable? The WP article about the lake uses 'Derwent Water', but a swift Google reveals that 'Derwentwater' is much the more prevalent usage. Keswick's official website uses the single word version. Keswick  -- Tim riley (talk) 17:58, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The Ordnance Survey have it as two words, as in Derwent Water. Although both versions seem to be acceptable. Mick Knapton (talk) 18:59, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Derwent Water or Derwentwater? 

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Catbells Northern Ascent, Lake District - June 2009.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on September 19, 2011. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2011-09-19. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! howcheng  {chat} 17:34, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Catbells Northern Ascent, Lake District - June 2009.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon
Talk:Exotic animal veterinarian

message: There is so much more information available on this career that this page could be much more elaborate and include so many things.  Is there any reason no one, especially veterinarians themselves, haven't added any new information to this article?  As a Pre-Veterinary Medicine student who has a lot of experience with exotic animal medicine - primates, reptiles, and other exotics specifically - I would love to be able to have more information that I possibly don't already know.  Even having references at the bottom to more information would be wonderful! Lhsmith430 (talk) 15:36, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Why so short?
Talk:Pio Gama Pinto

message: Added Indian Christians category--71.30.177.228 08:01, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: He studied in India.  Being covered by a project is informal, it will have no effect on the writing of the article. RJFJR (talk) 14:09, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Added category
Talk:Crinkle Crags

message: This page is redirected to from "Flesk".
According to the context on the article for Changeling, "Flesk" refers to a river or lake (people are rarely bathed in, not to mention drowned in a mountain or hill). There is no mention of such a river on this page, and the word "Flesk" is not present in the page, despite the fact that that word redirects here.
75.69.178.104 (talk) 21:45, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: fixed!  Flesk now redirects to Flesk (river), which is in Ireland.  not sure the connection with Crinkle Crags, which is in England. 207.255.118.240 (talk) 03:35, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Fleetwith Pike

message: "The white cross on the side of Fleetwith Pike overlooks Buttermere and marks the sad story of Fanny Mercer. Fanny was a young servant girl who worked for Mr Bowden Smith, a schoolteacher from Rugby. She accompanied his family on their summer vacation in the Lakes."
The story, reported here, https://www.nationaltrust.org.uk/visit/lake-district/buttermere-valley/history-of-buttermere, seems to add something worth passing on to readers of this article. 24.87.154.112 (talk) 01:11, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Talk:Formula SAE

message: I added a new section summarizing the rules. I did include a bit of speculation and explanation, but it is all NPOV. Some of it may not be entirely verifiable as much FSAE information is unpublished, learned by experience, or kept secret by teams. Please discuss anything you think does not meet wikipedia standards. This article really didn't talk much about the ins and outs of modern FSAE competition, so I wanted to add some information for the uninitiated and potential participants. Bdc101 (talk) 19:02, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Summary section

message: Formula North Canada is not an FSAE endorsed event. Hence it has been taken off the Winner's table listing. Thank you for considering us.FormulaNorth (talk) 21:22, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Winners section

message: I have to take issue with this statement from the aerodynamics section:
"Most teams do not build aerodynamic packages"
I was only involved in FSAE for 2 years 2011-2012 but then as well as now there were a significant number of teams running significant aero parts.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.235.41.82 (talk) 09:39, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Aero?

message: This article explains the cars and regulations of Formula Student but not how(or the mechanisms by which) the teams actually compete, or at least not directly.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by MZaZx (talk • contribs) 22:18, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Competition?
Talk:NWA Canadian Heavyweight Championship

message: Since reign #44 (King of the Yukon, 8th December 2012), there has been no citation for the championship reigns. ECCW.com lists the title as the ECCW Canadian Championship, with no mention of the NWA. Wrestling-titles.com's listing states that ECCW left the NWA in September 2012, while the listing for the ECCW Canadian Championship seems to tally with those from reign #44 onwards. Should this be reflected in the history of this title? --Morogth (talk) 12:55, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Status as an NWA title
Talk:Tactical Response Group

message: Surely this page should be more about what the West Aussie TRG is, rather than what the NSW TRG was? Battle Ape 08:29, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The result was merge into DESTINATION PAGE. -- Bjenks (talk) 00:59, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Surely this unit is no more or less significant than The Police Air Wing and should equally be regarded as part of Western Australia Police—which will greatly assist any reader to comprehend the whole story of policing in WA. I can only imagine that the NSW and Qld police are on a mammoth ego trip to want separate (un)encyclopedic entries on every unit, including some which went out of existence long ago (eg, SWOS. Cheers Bjenks (talk) 07:43, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WA Police should be the only article

message: Or at least, it's about a nostalgic police unit which has not existed for 18 years. It's successor units are adequately covered elsewhere, so I suggest we move on and delete the article. Otherwise incorporate it as a section of history within the NSW Police article. Bjenks (talk) 10:27, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is a non-article 

message: This article and the one on Special Weapons and Operations Squad deal with long-abandoned units of the NSW Police, or rather with styles of organisation which have been modified into a contemporary system. I.e., the SWOS/TRG functions have essentially been renamed. My proposal is to synopsise the content into a subsection under History, and point to the currently functioning units—the State Protection Group and the Public Order and Riot Squad. Bjenks (talk) 17:13, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Obviously this proposal is uncontroversial. Bjenks (talk) 06:35, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger into [[New_South_Wales_Police_Force#History|History section of  NSW Police]]
Talk:Debits and credits

message: The same information / table is repeated several times. I am not an expert, so can't do the clean-up myself, but it is definitely needed.Wapall (talk) 06:17, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs Cleanup 

message: Every transaction passes value between two parties. If a supplier sends our company 30 widgets on credit, the supplier as the source of value has his account credited. The company's widget account is debited as the destination/receiver of widgets (value).  If later the company pays cash to the supplier in payment, it passes value to the supplier in that transaction. The source/giver of value in the transaction is credited and so the company's cash a/c is credited with the payment. The destination/receiver of the value is debited and so the supplier's account is debited. Imagine an arrow lying across the accounts from right to left, from credit to debit. The arrow points from the source to the destination of the value passed in the transaction. (Of course the debit and credit will be entered in different accounts, e.g., credit to cash and debit to the person paid, or credit to supplier and debit to widget a/c.)
                       Debit            |     Credit
                       _________________|____________
                                        |
                                        | 
                  destination  <------value---------<< source 
                                        |
                                        |
Stikko (talk) 20:57, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that it's a helpful explanation, and it's the one given in the opening paragraph. 67.180.143.89 (talk) 21:09, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think the picture would help some people. Stikko (talk) 22:19, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  Agree with the picture helping.Wapall (talk) 06:14, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

text: In double entry bookkeeping there are two accounts involved in each ledger transaction.
   Debit            |     Credit
   ______|__________|____________
         |          |
        value 
         |
         V  
   destination  
                   
 Debit              |     Credit
   _________________|_________^___
                    |         | 
                    |         |
                    |      value
                    | 
                    |      source 
                    |
                    |
The source of value is on the credit side and the balancing value received is on the debit side. In the picture the value is shown as leaving the credit side upwards and entering the debit side on the balancing account downwards. Stikko (talk) 21:22, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Debits and credits - a way keep debits and credits straight. 

message: I know about which thing does debited or credited 103.103.57.210 (talk) 17:05, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Debite or credit
Talk:Rajiv Gandhi Government General Hospital

message: hi  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 106.220.14.17 (talk) 19:29, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  talk with doctors 

message: * A 'Plasma bank', for the welfare of the COVID-19 patients, has been set up by the Ministry of health sciences, Government of Tamil Nadu, with a fund allotment of more than ₹ 2 crores.
This implementation is done by  Edappadi K. Palanisamy esq., the Chief minister of Tamil Nadu state, in India.
This plasma bank is the second of its kind in India. Helppublic (talk) 05:53, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional informations
Talk:Jean Filliozat

message: Anyone want to add a mention of his relation to Jacqueline Filliozat, Pali scholar?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.170.212.34 (talk) 01:31, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to Jacqueline?
Talk:P. D. Gaitonde

message: Apparently this book may have some relevant information:
*
No comment on what exactly it says, just providing a citation example. Huon (talk) 21:32, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marathi book
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/TehKewl1 2

message: Username	TehKewl1
Total edits	1167
Distinct pages edited	964
Average edits/page	1.211
First edit	07:02, 20 May 2006
	
(main)	623
Talk	4
User	109
User talk	383
Image	2
Category	2
Wikipedia	40
Wikipedia talk	1
Portal	3
TehKewl1 editcount summary stats as of 08:47, October 29 2006, using Interiot's tool. (aeropagitica) 08:48, 29 October 2006 (UTC)