lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Japan–Korea Treaty of 1905

message: Perhaps we should re-examine the name of this one article in the context of all unequal treaties involving Korean  here?
In the list below, we find articles about treaties with non-neutral names. Some of the article names are inconsistent WP:Use English.  Articles involving treaties between Japan and Korea have been given Korean names, but articles about treaties with other countries have neutral names.
* Treaty of Ganghwa , 1876, Japan
** Korean-American Treaty of Amity and Commerce , 1882, United States
** China-Korea Treaty of Merchant and Commerce , 1882, China
* Treaty of Jemulpo , 1882, Japan
** Anglo-Korean Treaty of Amity and Commerce ,  1883, United Kingdom
** German-Korean Treaty of Amity and Commerce , 1883, Germany
** Russo-Korean Treaty of Amity and Commerce , 1884, Russia
* Treaty of Hanseong , 1885, Japan
** Franco-Korean Treaty of Amity and Commerce , 1886, France
* Japan-Korea Protocol of 1904 (:ko:제1차 한일 협약), 1905, Japan
* Eulsa Treaty (:ko:제2차 한일 협약), 1905, Japan
* Japan-Korea Annexation Treaty of 1907 , 1907,  Japan
* Japan-Korea Annexation Treaty , 1910, Japan
It is reasonable and timely to resolve anomalous article names.  For example, 
* 1876 Treaty of Ganghwa needs a neutral article name, i.e., Japan-Korea Treaty of 1876?
* 1882 Treaty of Jemulpo, also known as 
::    Treaty of Chemulpo needs a neutral article name, i.e., Japan-Korea Treaty of 1882?
* 1885 Treaty of Hanseong needs a neutral article name, i.e., Japan-Korea Treaty of 1885?
* 1904 Japan-Korea Protocol of 1904? or Japan-Korea Treaty of 1904?
* 1905 — Eulsa Treaty needs a neutral article name, i.e., Japan-Korea Treaty of 1905?
* 1907 Japan-Korea Annexation Treaty of 1907? or Japan-Korea Treaty of 1907?
* 1910 Japan-Korea Annexation Treaty? or Japan-Korea Treaty of 1910?
The true character of our problem is clarified when examined from a broader perspective. --Tenmei 17:12, 29 August 2010 --Tenmei (talk) 18:59, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Unequal treaties

message: Per a request, I have offered to mediate a naming dispute - please review Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2010-10-04/Eulsa Treaty and express your acceptance/rejection of me as mediator, or mediation there. Thanks. Hipocrite (talk) 08:10, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mediation 

message: The dates in the section about "Treaty Provisions" seem wrong. It mentions, for example, “The provisions of the treaty took effect in January 1885.” How can the treaty take effect years before it is even signed? A few lines later, the date of February 21, 2008, is mentioned, apparently wrong as well. Someone should verify those dates: I feel that somebody changed the right dates in an act of wiki-vandalism that went unnoticed... CielProfond (talk) 14:44, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates?
Talk:Futura (graffiti artist)

message: As the npov tag has been up since april, and there has been no discussion here, I am removing it.  If there is still a need for it, feel free to replace with any justifications, comments and suggestions here. - Sam 02:48, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV
Talk:Mr. Fusion

message: How is this a "Fictional Mister"? It's a machine. They just decided to call It Mr.Fusion. It's not a person. Removed. Gaiacarra 12:13, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

message: Why are there two versions of the logo? —TheMuuj Talk 05:18, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo 

message: A screenshot of the actual device as seen in the movies would be nice.  I made a quick look and didn't see one, but if anyone stumbles across one, it might be nice to include.  --Alecmconroy 17:54, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: A screenshot
Talk:University of Campinas Institute of Computing

message: This translation from portuguese is awful. It definetly needs revision.
--143.106.16.49 13:47, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Videoscandals

message: Hi!
Need some more substance on this article.
First there's no description of the Niño Verde (Emilio González Martínez) video, which was the first one shown, just a brief reference to it.   Could add that it received an award on Mtv, which of course he didn't personally receive...
Also need to add Carlos Imaz to the list of illustrious filmed politicians!
:Let's focus on NPOV Hari Seldon 21:50, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have removed a *lot* of unsourced info regarding living people, containing accusations, speculation and otherwise BLP violating material. If this is re-added, it needs to be sourced to a reliable secondary source as per policy. Only in death does duty end (talk) 11:46, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stubbed
Talk:List of airports by ICAO code: K

message: Some of the airports seem to have the FAA LID behind the ICAO code in this list instead of the IATA code, even if the format is clearly defined on the main page as:
Format of entries is:
* ICAO (IATA) – Airport Name – Airport Location (U.S. city and state)
I just corrected a few. Please pay attention to this when editing: Both the IATA code as well as the FAA LID are three-letter codes, but they do have a lot of conflicting assignments. The FAA LID is obviously a US-only thing (and it's usually the ICAO code without the leading "K"). --Bvontob (talk) 13:39, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  I should point out this for just in case: `US-only` is actually not accurate. Please see Obstacle Data - Regional Areas of Responsibility. - Hhswp (talk) 22:48, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: IATA vs FAA LID

message: KSUX is missing, but there is an entry for that airport.
KMSP Minneapolis / St Paul International Airport is missing from the list.
KRSW Fort Myers / Southwest Florida is missing. 03:44, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Allegedly the US assigns some unofficial non-standard alphanumeric codes to smaller airfields. Does anyone have any examples? cagliost (talk) 12:21, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alphanumeric US codes
Talk:Caroline Aherne

message: Sad news. However, neither of the cited sources give a date of death; it's quite possible that Aherne died yesterday, or even earlier. Does anyone have a  reliable source that does? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pigsonthewing (talk • contribs) 12:07, July 2, 2016 (UTC–4)
:Andy, I think your issue has now been resolved? The Guardian says "earlier today". Martinevans123 (talk) 18:56, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The first edit here was at 15:43, so I think we can assume it was not later than that. Martinevans123 (talk) 19:24, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

text: Pigsonthewing was asking about the date of death. I don't think there's any dispute about that any more? Wikipedia articles very rarely give a time of death. So I don't think it matters. Martinevans123 (talk) 19:51, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of death 

message: The lead image, under fair use rationale, is this one,uploaded in 2017. Is that really the best that can be employed under fair use? If that really is the best, I think the article might be better off without it. Martinevans123 (talk) 23:14, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image
Talk:Tony Kubek

message: Why did he retire at age 28? He only had two poor offensive seasons in a row (see http://www.baseball-reference.com/k/kubekto01.shtml), so I assume he had some kind of serious injury. Can someone post the details?
I discovered that he developed a debilitating back condition that made him retire before his time, but I don't remember the reference. --JimmyTheSaint 21:33, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: He's a hall of famer as a BROADCASTER.  His "career" was weak - and I'm being nice.  He hit 57 home runs in 8 partial years.  That's 57 lifetime.  He batted .266.  These days, he'd be playing AA ball, AAA - max.  He would have never made the Show. 73.6.96.168 (talk) 22:48, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: According to this old baseball card and Intelius, Kubek was born in 1935, not 1936. Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk) 22:31, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Age

message: He was 21 years old when he made his Major League debut.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.237.34.211 (talk) 15:52, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age 

message: He claimed to have retired to spend time with his "family" - yet there is no mention in this article about a spouse, or children or ?  One would think it reasonable for a guy who claimed to care about his family so much that he might at least have a mention of his actual family.  Right?  Did he have one? 73.6.96.168 (talk) 22:53, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  What "Family"?
Talk:Neck Face

message: Someone added this to the article:
Neck Face is also cousins with the infamous Richar Ramirez.
but without more information about who this Richar Ramirez is, it was out of place in the text. (so I removed it from the article for now)
Does someone know more about this person and can it be verified that this is in fact his cousin? Key to the city 06:54, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cousin

message: :I think Neck Face is one word...I was just reading Trasworld and it's spelled "Neckface" multiple times...69.236.96.216 (talk) 03:33, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There's a published work of Neck Face's work (see bibliography), and the book uses two words. Seems like a good standard to follow. 134.58.253.57 (talk) 15:00, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Oh, plus, he leaves a space between the words himself too. 134.58.253.57 (talk) 15:01, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Two words?

message: Unless someone can provide significant evidence that "Neckface" actually meets WP's Notability qualifications, I'm going to move for deletion. Bricology (talk) 20:37, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Survived AFD back in 2006.  RJFJR (talk) 20:43, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Entry doesn't meet WP:notability 
Talk:Adrian Serioux

message: I wasn't sure if we should include the brief stint where he was Red Bull property or not ... he was part of the team and trained with them and everything but never played a game. I guess as long as the trade is mentioned in the actual aticle, it's not necessary for the infobox.  --User:Jyardley 15:10, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Administrative division of Kyrgyzstan

message: Please post this at Oblasts of Kyrgyzstan. We are not suppose to agglutinate Turkic grammatical units to a borrowed word as long as most English speakers are only familiar with the original form. Changcheng 00:53, 20 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Problem solved by using Province, what is even more common to english people Tobias Conradi 04:04, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)

message: In 2004 one user of Wikipedia decided to use the term "province"  to refer to the oblasts.
In 2005 another user decided to use "province" instead of "oblast".
But except for Wikipedia and the Google Database, there seems to be almost no evidence that supports this translation.
As of 2014-10-16 Google shows a preview for "Talas Province" but not for "Talas Region" - maybe Google just copied the data from Wikipedia.
Derianus (talk) 22:56, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Provinces - Wikipedia based invention

message: I noticed that in at least the English Kyrgyzstan articles on oblasts the local name for the administrative unit was областы (oblastı), but the Kyrgyz articles showed it as облусу (oblusu).
In addition, I have found little evidence to support that the Kyrgyz translation is областы, while there is much more evidence to suggest it is in fact облусу.
I searched online dictionaries, coming up with облус (IPA: ˈɒbləst) on Glosbe and облусу on Google Translate.
I also did a general search on the web with Batken Region. For баткен областы I received about 199,000 results, while I received about 785,000 results for баткен облусу.
If anyone could weigh in with more sources either for or against this translation, or find a correct plural and/or a better transliteration for it, it would be greatly appreciated.
With the current evidence I will be changing the original translations. Mordecai Valasek (talk) 22:53, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oblastı or oblusu
Talk:Callum Blue

message: Hello, I have removed vandalism "He's a bit of a babe, you know" from this page. While true, not exactly Wikipedia-appropriate content..!
Rockcriedout (talk) 05:08, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bit of a babe 

message: Shouldn't his appearance as Bob Spencer in the short-lived [Related|Related] be mentioned? He was part of the main cast. (90.7.252.54 (talk) 20:11, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Related 

message: If anyone can find a picture for this I think it would help alot. ReelAngelGirl (talk) 17:41, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture
Talk:Klaus Mehnert

message: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diskussion:Klaus_Mehnert#.5B.5BKlaus_Mehnert.5D.5D
SignedTravb 14:21, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Asked for more details here

message: In a sowjet-communist book on Sorge, Mehnert is attacked viciously: the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor is simply blamed on his intelligence work. All this was in no real connection to the Sorge story and at first I just laughed about it. But there may be something strange about Mehnert' s stay in America. Also, He was a militant national revolutionary then, violently anti-American. --Radh (talk) 04:57, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vicious rumor 

message: Yes, Goebbels (and perhaps Mehnert at the time) was a Nazi, but a publication funded by The Third Reich to my mind was funded by the German state. There was no other Germany Mehnert could have worked for.--Ralfdetlef (talk) 14:34, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The wording reflects context from the cited sources, but I put "Nazi" in a different part of the sentence in hopes that it resolves the objection. Per WP:PCR: "It is possible that the reader knows nothing about the subject, so the article needs to explain the subject fully." Llll5032 (talk) 15:24, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nazi-funded
Template talk:David Attenborough

message: Can anybody justify the use of a fair-use image in this template? Joe D (t) 00:58, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't design it, but as far as I'm concerned it makes no difference to the relevant articles whether the image is there or not. The important thing is that the original image remains within the David Attenborough article. Chris 42 11:38, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Have now changed it. Chris 42 17:10, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair-use 

message: Current title: 
*David Attenborough's television and radio series
Alternatives:
*David Attenborough's filmography and radio output
*David Attenborough's series, features and programmes on television and radio
The list already contains some one off films and I added some programmes so maybe a change is needed.Gregkaye (talk) 15:00, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Title change

message: Would it be worth adding BBC Two to related as Attenborough was controller of the channel? Dunarc (talk) 14:25, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  BBC Two
Talk:Ramapo College

message: The list of buildings takes up a lot of space, but none of it is referenced and it is unclear whether these buildings have and historical or cultural significance. Simply listing names upon names of buildings is inappropriate for an encyclopedia. I propose deleting these sections if nothing changes. Melchior2006 (talk) 20:35, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Since nobody commented on this, I will delete the lists. --Melchior2006 (talk) 19:13, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section titled "Campus"
Talk:Hollow body electric guitar

message: We need examples of prototypes of all three categories, and also borderline cases between archtop and thin body, and between thin body and solid body. Andrewa 14:32, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Examples

message: Hmmmm.... current article reads have a less distorted sound while amplified, and while I know what they mean this could be better put... at the same output level from the guitar and with the same effects and amplifier, both with the same settings, the results will be very similar, and exactly as distorted. Solid body guitars are more often used for extreme distortion because they don't have the feedback problems of the hollow body, while hollow bodies are more often used for cleaner sounds because that's what they do best... heavy distortion throws away the tone that is the hollow body guitar's whole raison d'etre. Not quite sure how to put this into the article... Andrewa 06:38, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Accuracy
Talk:South African resistance to war

message: Ethnopunk (talk) 10:19, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Correct, a resistor is used in electronics.  I would propose moving the page to "South African war resisters", which is the proper capitalisation as well. dewet|™ 18:46, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

text: No, there is a built-in function which preserves the page edit history and so forth.  Simply click on "move" at the top of the page.  dewet|™ 16:19, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
Category talk:Birds of the Chatham Islands

message: Here are some relevant redlinks from List of New Zealand birds.
** Chatham Island Shag, Phalacrocorax onslowi
** Chatham Island Duck, Pachyanas chathamica - extinct
** Chatham Island Rail, Rallus modestus - extinct
** Giant Chatham Island Rail, Diaphorapteryx hawkinsi - extinct
** Chatham Island Banded Rail, Rallus dietienbachii - extinct
** Dieffenbach's Rail, Rallus philippensis dieffenbachii - extinct
** Chatham Islands Snipe, Coenocorypha pusilla - Vulnerable
** Giant Chatham Island Snipe, Coenocorypha chathamica - Extinct
** Chatham Island Sea-Eagle, Haliaeetus australis - Extinct
** Chatham Gerygone, Gerygone albofrontata - endemic
** Chatham Island Bellbird, Anthornis melanocephala - extinct
** Chatham Island Fernbird, Megalurus rufescens - extinct
-- Avenue 14:43, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Redlinks
Talk:Bitten (novel)

message: I was wondering whether we actually needed the 'also see' section at the bottom of this article. There are already links to the author's page within the text and the infobox, so that particular link seems a little unnecessary. The other books in the series are also listed on the author's page, and of course if you follow the infobox through it is possible to go through all the books in the series because it links to previous and next books in the series. Would it be acceptable to remove this section as a little surplus to requirements? What do others think? Silverthorn 08:51, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think removing them is fine as it's really unnecessary. -- 9muses 03:42, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  As there were no objections, I have removed this section. Silverthorn 10:43, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Also See Section

message: Do we have a link or citation to support this statement in the Trivia section? It may well be correct, but it seems safer to be able to provide evidence in case it gets challenged. Silverthorn 10:43, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I managed to track down a couple of links for this. Silverthorn 11:09, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed Movie

message: Why is it that the plot summary of this book is less detailed than those of the following books? Usually it's the other way around. Anyway, the plot summary should be similarly lengthened.ZFT (talk) 07:30, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot summary 
Talk:List of Legend of the Galactic Heroes media

message: OK, I know I just kinda cut off a lot of things from the main article and shoved them in here. Feel absolutely free to bring parts back to the main article if they are more relevant there. We just had to get those massive lists out. -  14:48, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Initial split 

message: If there is no official translation of this, then why is it in the English wiki?  I don't know about anyone else, but this doesn't seem notable to me, since it does not actually exist in English.
:For the same reason that a number of other well known, yet untranslated Anime are listed.  Notability does NOT rely on translation.  Witness Mobile Suit Gundam.  Although Wikipedia did not exist at the time that the series finally made it to the US,  no one who was knowlegable regarding Anime would dispute it's notability.
CBeilby (talk) 07:47, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: To expand on my previous point, let me continue using Gundam as a hypothetical example.  Mobile Suit Gundam, were it not to have been imported and released in the US, would not be notable per the criteria of the anonymous poster, in spite of the fact that it's influence on it's particular genre of anime (Military/Real Robot anime,) a genre which has had MANY examples released in English, and a genre which it, arguably, created, is irrefutable.  Judging notability based strictly on whether a work has been released in English is superficial, and, in all honesty, a mistake
CBeilby (talk) 01:14, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translated? 

message: The episode list at "Anime series and OVAs" section seems unnecessary, seeing as we have a much better list at List of Legend of the Galactic Heroes episodes. I think it can be safely removed. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  20:07, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplicate list
Talk:Pharmakos

message: This article is total garbage! Whoever wrote this article does not even know enough Greek to pluralize pharmakos to pharmakoi! Pharmakoi are druggies, thus explaining the word "pharmacology" as well as explaining why people put them to death back in the day when people were sane enough to to put druggies to death! The Bible translates the greek "pharmakoi" into the english "sorcerer", meaning poisoner, not prisoner, you Godless drug-addled morons. Gopchristian 14:55, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: This page needs serious work. It doesn't relate any coherent narrative, and lacks an encyclopedic tone (for example, the statement "pharmakoi are druggies" is utterly out of place in an encyclopedia). Mostly it needs much better writing, but it's currently written so poorly that I can't reliably extract the necessary facts to put in a rewrite. --Trovatore 14:36, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: cleanup tag

message: Liddell and Scott gives two words that can be transliterated as "pharmakos": one with a circumflex accent on the second syllable meaning "poisoner" and so on, which occurs at the earliest in the Septuagint; the other with an accute accent on the final syllable meaning "scapegoat", which occurs in Greek of the 5th cent. BC. I would like to speculate here that this latter word may incorporate three Egyptian elements: p- (def. art.)+ hryt ("fear") + mkt ("protective magic"). There is no evidence (as far as I know) that the Egyptians used the scapegoat ritual, though there is plenty of evidence of magical practices in the country from early dynastic times to the present day. Not unlike many other countries in fact. Pamour (talk) 21:21, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  pharmakos 

message: The article says "The victims themselves were referred to as pharmakoi and the sorcerer was referred to as a pharmakon." I looked for the article cited as a source and it says NOTHING about a sorcerer being called the pharmakon. Pharmakon is just the same as pharmakos, just that it is in a different declension. This article should either be rewritten or erased completely.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.241.159.4 (talk) 03:00, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pharmakon as a sorcerer?? WRONG