Talk:Short-beaked echidna

message: In preparation for the production of a spoken version of this article, I'd like to change:
The limbs of the Short-beaked Echidna are adapted for rapid digging, having short limbs and powerful claws.
which reads a little awkwardly, to:
The limbs of the Short-beaked Echidna are adapted for rapid(very fast) digging, being short and having powerful claws.
or something similar, if anyone can come up with an improvement.
I'll do this in a few days, if nobody objects. Macropode 07:30, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Reads clearer to me.--cj | talk 09:28, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Physical description 

message: Can someone with more expertise than me request this article for Featured Article of the Day? I think it's worthy.
Bibliomaniac15 00:46, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured Article of the Day 

message: :The species is found throughout Australia, where it is the most widespread native mammal, and in coastal and highland regions of southwestern New Guinea, where it is known as the Mungwe.
In what language? New Guinea is one of the most linguistically diverse places on the planet, and somehow I doubt all the languages there use the same name. Is this an Indonesian word, or a Tok Pisin word, or what? --Ptcamn 05:54, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you, Petaholmes! --Ptcamn 23:05, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Guinea name 

message: I read pretty much the whole article before finally realising that this article describes what most australians would call 'the echidna'. Could it be better explained in the introduction that this is by far the most common echidna found in Australia, and is the most well known, rather than being buried down in the "cultural references" section, or requiring a visit to echidna? Stevage 08:44, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Most common echidna? 

message: Hello!
I would recommend you to protect this article! If not, the spammers will continue messing up this nice article. Admins, where are you?
Then we should restore the right version..
Tilmandralle 16:26, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, they'll keep messing it up, and we will keep reverting it. The featured article of the day should never be protected: User:Raul654/protection —Keenan Pepper 16:44, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Ok, thank you for answering. So we'll keep reverting :-) Tilmandralle 16:32, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Do they mention this species by name, or just echidna in general? - UtherSRG (talk) 00:40, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protection 

message: The genus Zagl... has only one species in it, and so I can't understand the logic in this sentence: "This has conservation implications for the endangered species of echidna from the genus Zaglossus, and to a lesser extent for the Short-beaked Echidna". (Sorry for my bad english), Ybk33 00:58, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Your question is answered by going to the Zaglossus article.... there are three species in Zaglossus. - UtherSRG (talk) 01:57, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  question 

message: This article might end up at WP:FAR due to a lack of citations. Judging by the list at WP:URFA it will probably get nominated soon as people work through the 2005 list and those are being worked through. YellowMonkey  (cricket photo poll!) paid editing=POV 06:52, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  FAR 

message: I'm translating from this article to Japanese article now. I found two sources of stamps in 1974 and in 1987 which is on the Echidna, but I'm not sure whether can I add these source on the article or not because I don't know rules of English Wikipedia well. Then I'm writing this information;
*Stamp Collections: Wild Animals and Lizards: There is a stamp of the Echidna in 1974 in Australia Section.
*1987 Wildlife II Definitives MUH Australia Stamp Set : I found this set on eBay, so google it by this name.
At least, those stamps were issued. Regards--Koolah (talk) 08:47, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I hate to sound rude, but given your poor English writing skills, you shouldn't be writing on the English wiki. Thanks for the sources though. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:34, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry for writing in my poor English. If you don't like my edit, please revert it.--Koolah (talk) 02:10, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other two sources of Stamps 

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests January 2012 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:37, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Ameisenigel Unterseite-drawing.jpg Nominated for Deletion

message: The top of the article refers to baby echnidas moving out of their mothers' pouches and burrows (Baby echidnas eventually grow too large and spiky to stay in the pouch and, at around six months of age, they leave the burrow).  However, there is nothing in the article that explains a) when, where and how the egg hatches; b) that the mother has a pouch and the baby climbs in; and c) what burrow all this is taking place in.  Can someone add more information? Risssa (talk) 03:45, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  What pouch? What burrow? 

message: I feel navigation about this article would benefit by having more headings/sub-headings, for example "Senses" and "Adaptations" with relevant sub-headings.  Normally, I would be bold in my editing and do this, however, it is a featured article and therefore a lot of work has already been done and my headings might therefore cause a little controversy.  What do people think about the addition of headings?__DrChrissy (talk) 20:18, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  More sub-headings 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Short-beaked echidna. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160224113250/http://www.depi.vic.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/205894/Echidna.pdf to http://www.depi.vic.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/205894/Echidna.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141202035040/http://dpipwe.tas.gov.au/wildlife-management/animals-of-tasmania/mammals/echidnas-and-platypus/short-beaked-echidna to http://dpipwe.tas.gov.au/wildlife-management/animals-of-tasmania/mammals/echidnas-and-platypus/short-beaked-echidna
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141202035040/http://dpipwe.tas.gov.au/wildlife-management/animals-of-tasmania/mammals/echidnas-and-platypus/short-beaked-echidna to http://dpipwe.tas.gov.au/wildlife-management/animals-of-tasmania/mammals/echidnas-and-platypus/short-beaked-echidna
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:39, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The article describes the range outside Australia, as coastal and highland regions of southwestern New Guinea. As the map shows, this in incorrect. Southwestern New Guinea would refer to a large part of Indonesian New Guinea, but it is almost entirely in Papua New Guinea, which is the eastern half of the island. And even if one meant to say southwestern Papua New Guinea, it would still be incorrect, as the populations in the southeast of Indonesian Papua, and in the southeast coast, the highlands, and the Huon Peninsula of Papua New Guinea do not fit that descriptor either. I have changed it therefore to “eastern New Guinea”. Ptilinopus (talk) 02:01, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Range 

message: might we mark this older FA as “Satisfactory” at WP:URFA/2020?  leaving it to you, not watchlisting, SandyGeorgia (Talk)  02:42, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  URFA 

message: I find the geographical warping in File:Short-beaked Echidna area.png unsatisfactory, especially for a Featured Article. The map template used wasn't designed for singling out regions on the far edges such as Australasia. I could create an unwarped version if that would be considered desirable. While I'm at it, I wonder whether it would be desirable to create a single map for all extant species / subspecies of monotreme, with each taxon shown in a different colour? 15:35, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure, unwarp away! An all-monotremes map might work quite well because there's not a lot of confusing overlap - just platypus and short-beaked echidna; might use an extra colour for the overlap region. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 18:25, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I made an attempt. I decided to exclude the platypus to avoid overlapping, and the platypus already has a quality range map anyway. So it is a range map of all extant echidnas. I also decided to exclude showing subspecies separately as I wasn't able to find reliable information about the exact delineation of one subspecies from another. Please feel free to make suggestions for improvement, and I may make a second edition if needed. Ypna (talk) 02:44, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Nice work, thanks! --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 17:37, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Range map 

message: I propose merging Kangaroo Island short-beaked echidna into Short-beaked echidna. There is nothing in this newly created article which can not be here; the creator has already reverted the redirect.Ymblanter (talk) 08:27, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It should either be redirected or deleted. There was only one self-published blog as a source, so there's nothing to merge. DrKay (talk) 20:42, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: Hello, in my free time, i like to search for weights studies of mammals. I currently have weight studies of about 2300 species and about 9000 entries that I oversee thoroughly.
Here are some on this animal, that might or might not be in the article (but i'm thinking not !) :
*Tate, G. H. H. (1952). Weights of Queensland Mammals. Journal of Mammalogy, 33(1), 117–118. doi:10.1093/jmammal/33.1.117
*Abensperg-Traun, M. (1991). A study of home range, movements and shelter use in adult and juvenile echidnas, Tachyglossus aculeatus (Monotremata: Tachyglossidae), in Western Australian wheatbelt reserves. Australian Mammalogy, 14(1), 13-21.
*Wilkinson, D. A., Grigg, G. C., & Beard, L. A. (1998). Shelter selection and home range of echidnas, Tachyglossus aculeatus, in the highlands of south-east Queensland. Wildlife Research, 25(3), 219-232.
*Peggy D. Rismiller, Michael W. McKelvey. 2000. Frequency of Breeding and Recruitment in the Short-Beaked Echidna, Tachyglossus Aculeatus. Journal of Mammalogy, Volume 81, Issue 1, February 2000, Pages 1–17.
*Nicol, S., & Andersen, N. A. (2007). The life history of an egg-laying mammal, the echidna (Tachyglossus aculeatus). Ecoscience, 14(3), 275-285.
*Nicol, S. C., Andersen, N. A., Morrow, G. E., & Harris, R. L. (2018). Spurs, sexual dimorphism and reproductive maturity in Tasmanian echidnas (Tachyglossus aculeatus setosus). Australian Mammalogy, 41(2), 161-169.
Just wanted to help a bit :) Gimly24 (talk) 13:23, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some studies on morphology 

message: Is the spinal cord of Armadillos also very short?
And that of the other two varieties of spiny curling up "hedgehogs" - the European hedgehog and the Madagascan Pigmy Tenrec?
It isn't obvious to me that having long nerve roots and a short cord is required, or specially helpful, in curling up into a ball. One needs a bit of slack and/or stretchy wiring certainly.  An argument from several species would be interesting, and more convincing of association rather than coincidence.  Midgley (talk) 06:06, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spinal cord length in curling-up species