lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hanover Shoe Farms

message: I have catagorized the article and many links are there so I deleted those flags. I also deleted the notability flag. I'll work on cleanup soon. ~Rainpaw
*There. I divided the article into sections, reorganized the references, added external links, etc... I'm also trying to put a picture in but am having a hard time. Can someone specify what the cleanup tag is for so I can take care of it. Barn Cat 18:23, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes

message: This article uses very slanted language, I only read a couple paragraphs in before I tagged it. The entire article needs revamping. Sean Montgomery 14:22, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay. We'll get to work on that when we get the chance. Barn Cat 16:45, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Take your time, as I see it, there's no need to rush. Sean Montgomery 06:39, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bias?

message: I came across this article while on one of my weasel hunts. I stuck around for the better part of an hour to untangle this mess. I don't expect people to be happy with my changes, and if they are reverted, it won't matter to me. I say that because an edit war is not on my agenda. 
The language, I cleaned that up as best I could to provide more neutrality. I also slaughtered several weasels. However, when it came to the history section, I balked. There are huge amounts of highly obtuse information listed there. Paragraph after paragraph of which horse did what and when and how much and how many, all written in a very "insider" motif. I ended up removing almost all of it.
I believe that those sections can be added back, if reworded and with less information. I also think it won't hurt to put them back if edited for clarity. That's about the best rationale I can give for my changes. I won't be coming back to the article, as I am a random page weasel hunter. However, if anyone feels strongly enough about the issue, my talk page is always open. Kale Weathers (talk) 14:14, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  My edits
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Martial arts/Navbox

message: Hope you don't mind! Mekugi 15:44, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Wikiproject/ Martial arts portal logo 

message: As much as I may be a martial arts enthusiast, as an Asian I'm frankly offended that China, Japan, Korea, Shinto and Buddhism are listed as "related WikiProjects". How are these related projects? Is it meant to pander to stereotypes? Why isn't Europe included? Why isn't Hinduism included? I will be removing them as I really can't imagine any justification. Morinae (talk) 18:16, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it is more on how the project evolved.  Originally the whole project was heavily weighted towards Japan and then China - Euro and Indo centric articles came later.  No sweat if you want to remove them but I don't think their inclusion was pandering to anything.Peter Rehse (talk) 18:25, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Related
Talk:The Chameleon's Shadow

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement.  Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. 💵Money💵emoji💵Talk💸Help out at CCI!  12:31, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:Dupont

message: The founding member of the family in the US is Eleuthère Irénée du Pont, so I will amend the reference accordingly.--ukexpat 15:33, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have rethought my previous change and now made it clear that this link refers to the French patriarch. --ukexpat 15:40, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  DuPont Family 

message: It says on the Dow Chemical Company's page that it is the "World's second largest chemical company", but it also says this in this page.  I am not sure which is which.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.93.179.70 (talk) 23:10, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Dow Chemical Company/DuPont 

message: "du Pont", "Dupont" or "Dupond", means in French "from the bridge" (du pont), it's a family name for those who propably lived near a bridge.
It's said one of the most common French name.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:E35:8A8D:FE80:85CB:D00D:634D:E2B8 (talk) 14:18, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meaning
Talk:Exodus (Bertagna novel)

message: Exodus (2007 novel)?? The book was published in August 2002. 
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Thenineteenth (talk • contribs) 
:I belive the move was a simple mistake.  Both this article and 2002_Whitbread_Awards claims that this book has been listed for an award in 2002, I have a translaton of the book published in 2005 which also mentions a 2002 prize, so it cannot have be a 2007 novel.  I will move the article to Exodus (2002 novel) from Exodus (2007 novel).  – b_jonas 15:09, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The article Julie Bertagna also claims it's from 2002.  – b_jonas 15:11, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: Could Fox in Exodus be a comparison to Mozilla Firefox? --88.104.167.212 (talk) 16:08, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Somehow I doubt that, but that sense might have been lost in translation (for the name is mirror translated whereas "Firefox" is identity translated). – b_jonas 07:22, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fox
Talk:T Choithram International SA v Pagarani

message: There has been some troubling editing on this article.  When I wrote the original article I used the phrase that the deceased went through a "ceremony of marriage" with his second wife, and inserted a footnote to the effect that the original claimants had argued originally that this second marraige was invalid under the lex loci celebrationis, although they had lost the point at first instance and had not appealed it.  This appears in the case reports.  However, this material has now been removed three times.  I reverted it the first two time (each time from an anonymous IP address and without explanation), but I cannot revert it a third time without breaking the 3RR.  Accordingly, I will allow some pause for thought and then put some alternative phraseology in (although the point is not central to the case).  However, I find this sort of lightweight POV editing troubling, and I am guessing that there is a breach of the rules on WP:COI going on. --Legis (talk - contribs) 13:21, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: After a lengthy cooling off period, I have reinstated this using more neutrel language. --Legis (talk - contribs) 18:37, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Marriage to second wife
Talk:The Terror of Blue John Gap

message: If I remember this story correctly, it places Blue John Gap as being some 12 miles from Castleton, Derbyshire.  In reality, Blue John is found only in the hills around Castleton, i.e. within about a 3-mile radius.
Maybe this information could be worked into the article?  — 92.40.49.151 (talk) 12:47, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geographical error 

message: Most sources state this was published in The Strand Magazine in August 1910  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.169.128.203 (talk) 14:10, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I did some digging and came to the same conclusion so I've updated the article. (Emperor (talk) 18:19, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Publication date
Talk:Karl Rolvaag

message: Interesting that Karl Rolvaag is suddenly back in the front-page headlines 46 years after the event. Michael Hardy (talk) 18:19, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The 1962 race for Minnesota governor was one of the closest races in the history of U.S. politics.  Karl Rolvaag (D) beat incumbent governor Elmer L. Anderson (R) by just 91 votes.  Before becoming Minnesota's governor, Mr. Anderson ran the St. Paul based Fuller Company, a leading manufacturer of adhesives.  While there were doubtless many reasons for Mr. Rolvaag's victory, his campaign signs and Billboards featuring Mr. Anderson's photo and the slogan "Back To Glue In 62" were the talk of the State.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.93.120.50 (talk) 06:08, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Slogan That Won The 1962 Election For Governor.
Talk:Redhill, Somerset

message: "This article or section is not written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Please improve it ..." could whoever wrote that please give me something mroe specific? I don't want tohe article to be deleted - it's dear to me, but i don't, at present, have the time to re-write it.
:I didn't write that comment but have now looked at the article in some depth & attempted to revise it to bring it more into line with the Manual of Style. I have attempted to remove some of the phrases which were not from a Neutral point of view and some of the colloquialisms. In some sections there is still to much detail including the names of local farmers etc which, while adding "colour" do not really sit well in an encyclopedia. There is also a fair amount of repetition between the history sections. Further information would be useful about the village today (eg population, employment) and perhaps the other areas detailed in Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements.— Rod talk 20:14, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: One thing I think should happen here is for the history section to be removed to it's own page, and a summary left here. See Wikipedia:WikiProject_UK_geography/How_to_write_about_settlements#History. Some material might also stay here under Landmarks and Economy etc. Derek Andrews 01:01, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Jamie Sanders

message: I've replaced the former redirect to an incredibly minor soap-opera character with a stub for up-and-coming jockey and horse trainer Jamie Sanders. I know very little about either, but decided to create this article partly on a Wikipedia-whim, and partly to fight the trend of stubs with plenty of prose but very little sourcing. My stub is the reverse — only three sentences, but including four sources, proper categories and a specific stub tag, and links to relevant articles. I'm hoping domain-knowledge folks will take it from here to flesh out this stub, especially if Sanders and her horse do well in the upcoming Kentucky Derby. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 16:06, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Heh heh, I actually created the OLTL redirect etc., but I wanted you to know that you've done the right thing — in my book,  real people trump fictional characters! Well, unless there's a real person named J.R. Ewing, LOL. Oh, and by the way, nice stub, I wish everyone was so thorough. TAnthony 16:14, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks for the note. I'm more interested in sourcing articles than in writing them these days, since there's so little of the former and so much of the latter. This stub is just an extreme example of my new priorities, I guess. ☺ ~ Jeff Q (talk) 16:41, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

text: Hey, I know you've admitted you're not a Jamie Sanders expert, but no articles currently link to this one, which will eventually lead to its deletion; if possible, help me find at least one article to link to it. Thanks. TAnthony 16:27, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Well, some of the sources I provided actually give more information on Teuflesberg than they do about Sanders. I was contemplating doing a stub for the horse, too, but have run out of time for this Wikipedia session. Perhaps you could extract a few items for a Teuflesberg stub, especially since it now has five articles linking to it. Then you could include a J.S. link to "legitimize" this article. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 16:41, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Started jockey/trainer article
Talk:Chopsocky

message: I noticed that my addition that the term is a "disparaging" against martial arts cinema has been edited to imply that it "could" be used as one.  I am leaving the note here to let whoever did edit it to know that the term without a doubt is disparaging.  Being a fan of the genre for many years, it is not a word that is used to flatter the genre and was specifically created to put down the films during the boom in the 70s in the US where the films were released in exploitative fashion with badly made English dubs that made the movies look bad. 9th Gate 16:08, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Right now, there is OR (entomology isn't documented in a reliable source) and inappropriate tone ("(aka non-fans)"). — RevRagnarok Talk Contrib 19:42, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disparaging 

message: From Chop-suey + sock (=punch), I think. Grassynoel 04:19, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Etymology

message: Chop Socky Chooks is an animated kids show about chickens.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.33.18.10 (talk) 10:04, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chop Socky Chooks
Talk:Fishing lure

message: I am new to the wikipedia community and posted this article. I am just looking to hear some feedback on the article. Thanks.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Danishrolls (talk • contribs) 16:38, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Wrong! Anything that isn't considered constructive or productive for WP editing purposes may be removed in whole immediately...especially your trolling.⋙–Berean–Hunter—► ((⊕)) 04:01, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Feedback

message: I understand the proposed change and the desire to merge decoys into lures, but there is a distinct difference for those that collect.  I know of no class of lures that does not have hooks and lures are traditionally pulled using a fishing reel or the boat when trolling and therefore are forced into active motion to attract fish.  A subset of decoys have hooks, but the majority do not.  Decoys traditionally are not pulled by reels or boats but are tied to a stationary position and may be moved by the current but attract fish not by motion but by simply being there.  Decoys are used predominantly when spearing fish during ice fishing so the method for obtaining the fish is different.  I feel that there is enough distinction to warrant a separate page, but would not object to linking the two together. —Preceding comment added by birdfarmer (talk  • contribs) 13:35, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The main problem  is that you haven't cited the article you wrote on fishing decoys with a single reliable source. Please read Wikipedia:Verifiability, which is a Wikipedia foundation policy, and see if you can cite the article appropriately. (some of the books you listed in the article would be suitable for citations). --Epipelagic (talk) 20:18, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose merge; while I agree that the Fish decoy article hasn't been properly referenced, it does have suitable references listed in the Fish decoy#Reference Books section, and they do seem to be sufficiently distinct and independently notable from lures. Keeping them separate is consistent with WP:MERGEREASON, because "The separate topics could be expanded into longer standalone (but cross-linked) articles". Klbrain (talk) 21:45, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Merged [[Fish decoy]] into this article
Category talk:Lists of state leaders by year

message: *The BC listings should be placed in time-sequential order as are all listings following. The list at the time of this writing should thus begin with "List of state leaders in 1275 BC," rather than starting with "List of state leaders in 1 BC" and then jumping around through a few non-sequential BC years and periods and then returning in sequence to AD years. Unfortunately, this editor was apparently somehow not permitted access to the list and thus was unable to remedy the chaotic disarray of the first entries.Grammarmonger 16:12, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: i have started going through these lists and changing the year ranges to bring them into a consistent style within Wikipedia Manual of Style guidelines. Previously the year ranges had wikilinks for the years & the years were separated by either hyphens or spaced hyphens " - ", i have changed this to no wikilinks & unspaced en dashes in a few of the lists so far. David Woodward (talk) 10:58, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  year ranges
Talk:Midland College

message: Why are the links to the Chaparral getting removed? Uncle Milty (talk) 01:01, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  School mascot 
Talk:Anorak

message: Okay, I typed in "parka" in wikipedia, looking for the clothing but instead I find a poorly-written article on a UK band. So I edited the page so it would redirect to Anorak. Needless to say, my edit was reverted, with no clear explaination on why it was reverted. So I redirected it again, and it was reverted again, with no clear explaination. I can bet that 85 - 90% of people who type in "parka" on Wikipedia are looking for the clothing and not the band. If there has to be an article for the band, why not create a page with this title: Parka (band). I think my edit should stay. --74.34.217.222 16:27, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree with you. The band seems to be non-notable. There is no need to create a separate page about the band in my opinion. The article was originally a redirect -- somebody turned into an article on band. utcursch | talk 16:33, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem
Template talk:Dukes of Cornwall

message: Shoudn't Prince Charles, the current incumbent, be on this list? --Jfruh (talk) 16:28, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: HRH The Duke of Cornwall is on this list... DBD 13:35, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh!  I see ... it's no the most ... obvious way of setting it up, I guess.  One expects him to be in the same list as the others... --Jfruh (talk) 14:05, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

message: The first son of Charles I, Charles James, b. and d. 18 May 1629 is in :Template:Dukes of Rothesay but not this one. Did he survive birth or not? Opera hat (talk) 13:50, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Charles James 

message: Edward of Westminster, Prince of Wales  is listed as 1453-1471. However his claim to the Dukedom was arguably not recognised in 1460, when Richard of York, 3rd Duke of York was granted the title, marked here as disputed, and between 1461 and 1470 (and arguably at the time of his death in 1471) his claim was at best doubtful given his father had been deposed as King. Thus like Richard's "disputed" should this not somehow be reflected in the template? Dunarc (talk) 23:42, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edward of Westminster, Prince of Wales - dates as Duke
Talk:Special Program of Assisted Reproduction

message: From the article:
:The Special Program of Assisted Reproduction (SPAR) is a program offered to HIV discordant couples at the Bedford Research Foundation’s clinical laboratory [1]. The program takes advantage of ART (Assisted Reproduction Technology) procedures (including "sperm washing") to assist couples achieve a pregnancy who would otherwise risk transmitting the father's HIV infection to the mother and the child through intercourse.
I'm presuming HIV-discordant means one partner has HIV and the other does not; this is an educated guess, however.  My question is: why is the assumption implicit that it is always the male who is the HIV carrier in practice?
My guess is that this is unintentional: it isn't saying that it the man who always without exception brings HIV into the relationship, but that when it's the woman who's carrying HIV, one can achieve risk-free conception by just using IVF.  (Risk-free as far as the father is concerned: the baby is another story, but there's not much that can be done about that.)  That is, no special techniques are required. --Saforrest 16:37, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  HIV "discordant", possible POV-ness?
Talk:Angor animi

message: This stub could mistakenly alarm those whose physician has diagnosed the symptom, not disease, 'angor animi'. It is referred to as a dysfunction of the circulatory system. Further reading of the primary literature tells us of people dying from it alone. Angor animi is also a symptom of classical migraine, usually harmless and easily treated.
Angor animi may be more common than documented: one friend, who described an indescribable terror (prodrome), reticular vision grading to an image of the world identical to that on van Gogh's canvasses (aura), then throbbing temple (pain) knew his physician would consider him mentally disturbed, as van Gogh was.
Migraine, like epilepsy, can appear in many guises. Though I'm only a geologist, conversations with other migraineurs suggests 'angor animi' is a not an uncommon early indication of classical migraines. I've learned to recognize it; yet, I still ask my wife to check me every ten minutes during an attack (to see whether I'm alive). Yesterday's attack was followed by no headache, but sciatica (which gives me the time to contribute this comment :-). (Sciatica can be a migraine pain substitute.)
'Angor animi' is a subjective sensation that, in my experience, either varies in intensity or comes in distinct kinds. The less severe is well described here as a certainty of imminent death, though the person may be confused and view the sensation less clearly as a vague, but very severe, mental anguish. The more severe kind was best described in the 1st edition of Oliver Sach's book 'Migraine' as, I believe, an abandonment by God. This variety or degree is truly terrifying, even to those who have little or no fear of death.
My suggestion is that the article be 'softened' to not unduly alarm those with a symptom diagnosed as 'angor animi'. We all feel, I'm sure, it is important that those who experience it know in advance that it is frighteningly ushering in very painful, but probably harmless, angina or headache, not death. The neurological literature has likely made this clear.
'Angor animi' should be easy to diagnose. Some sufferers of classical migraine shuttered in fear at just the words 'migraine' or 'headache'. The neurological literature should offer good, diagnostic criteria.
Geologist (talk) 18:29, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I have flagged the page as being in need of additional sources. Thank you.  71.252.113.85 (talk) 22:51, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Angor animi and Migraine
Talk:Beltrán de la Cueva, 1st Duke of Alburquerque

message: The "la" is not capitalised, see the Spanish Wiki and any other Wiki or reference work. Further, there is no need for "1st Duke of Alburquerque" here, since his name is unambiguous and he is pretty famous (not as duke of Alburquerque, however). Srnec (talk) 23:41, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move