Talk:Battle of Pulo Aura

message: As a courtesy I am leaving a notice that I am preparing a new, expanded and sourced version of this article in my Userspace (using the current page as a basis). It should be pasted up here in a week or two. If anyone has any comments then by all means drop me a line.--Jackyd101 (talk) 06:21, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The new article is now in place. For the series of edits I made in constructing the article, see User:Jackyd101/Battle of Pulo Aura. Any comments, amendments and assistance would be appreciated.--Jackyd101 (talk) 16:27, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion

message: User:Rama added the following quote to the article attributed to Napoleon. I appreciate the assistance very much, but I have two problems with it at the moment. The first is that the source is not one that I think complies with WP:RS, and the second is that according to a source I have (William Laird Clowes), the quote is actually referring to the Battle of Vizagapatam six months later. It is possible that Clowes is wrong, but in the absense of anything corroborating this information I have removed the quote from the article until it can be more presicely sourced. Thanks--Jackyd101 (talk) 17:16, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Napoleon quote

message: Images provided by User:Benea pertaining to this engagement.--Jackyd101 (talk) 16:02, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Note: I commented out the gallery because it seemed to interfere with the transclusion of the GA review. Dabomb87 (talk) 13:52, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Uncommented after fixing closing gallery tag.  Jappalang (talk) 13:58, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Images

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Battle of Pulo Aura. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140202231644/http://www.armada.cl/prontus_armada/site/artic/20090712/pags/20090712183008.html to http://www.armada.cl/prontus_armada/site/artic/20090712/pags/20090712183008.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:13, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The article lists 2 different dates for this battle, 14 Feb and 15 Feb. Is there anyone who can confirm which is accurate or if both are? My research indicates that the British convoy was intercepted on the 14th but the exchange of fire takes place on the 15th, but I've lost my sourcing for it and would prefer not to edit without proper sourcing.
Thanks!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rastatok (talk • contribs) 05:49, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please double check date 

message: The article makes several mentions of a Dutch brig "Aventurier". The Dutch spelling of "Adventurer" would be "Avonturier", however I have trouble finding information about this particular ship (as ships and adventurers tend to go hand in hand, muddying the search results). Also, the battle does have French involvement (and Aventurier is correct French spelling). Perhaps someone else with better knowledge of the maritime involvements in that period can shed some light on this? MiG (talk) 12:04, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Aventurier"