lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Jacob Neusner bibliography

message: On April 6, 2005, this article was nominated for deletion.  The result was keep.  See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Jacob Neusner bibliography for a record of the discussion. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 01:37, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It was nominated again, and kept: Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Jacob Neusner bibliography 2. Eugene van der Pijll 21:36, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: VfD

message: Why was the conclusion listed as "keep"?  Looking at the most recent discussion page on the proposal to delete the article, shouldn't it be concluded that the consensus was to trim down the bibliography to a more reasonable level, and merge that into the main Jacob Neusner article?  I am concerned that Neusner's massive bibliography page is (a) not an encyclopedia article, (b) a vanity page, (c) Totally out of line when compared to the bibliographies of all other people on this entire encyclopedia, and (d) not even in line with Neusner's own college!  They don't bother to place all this info on their website. Given the comments on the discussion page, I hope if no one takes offense at me attempting to edit this bibliography down to a more modest level. RK 21:27, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that is the best thing one can do with this page. JFW | T@lk 22:06, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Why was the conclusion listed as "keep"?
Talk:Mary Lindenstein Walshok

message: Not sure why this has a cleanup tag. Not extremely notable but not deleteable. Tamarkot 01:49, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup?

message: On April 6, 2005, this article was nominated for deletion.  The result was keep.  See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Mary lindenstein walshok for a record of the discussion. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 01:50, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: VfD
Talk:FLAC

message: The article mentions twice a typical rate of 50-60%, and later it says "FLAC achieves compression rates of 30–50% for most music." anoko_moonlight (talk) 04:28, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you mean it has to say 40-50% to be correct? C'mon +-10%. --Kays (talk) 22:28, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: What this community member meant, or so I believe, was that it should state one approximate rate which is agreed upon and not two which partially contradict each other. --lmaxmai (talk) 00:15, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: After FLAC compression, the file size is typically reduced to 50-60% of the original size, which is the same as saying that it is reduced by 40-50%. Although previous versions may have been confusing, I think the current text in the article states this accurately without any contradiction. LiberatorG (talk) 15:24, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistency in compression rate 

message: There is no indication in the article how the codec achieves its lossless compression. That's a major omission, I'd say. 83.104.249.240 (talk) 21:14, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  How does it work? 

message: I would like that article would list Processing Power demands on encoding FLAC,
compared to other compression format like mp3.
I would like to know,
do I save CPU and pay more in RAM (or whatever it is it is happening), when choosing to use FLAC as PulseAudio Home Network Broadcast Sink as compare to Mp3.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.187.193.217 (talk) 15:06, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Encoding Processing Power 

message: The reference associated with | latest release version =  in the first infobox is not displaying. The Wikidata itself looks reasonable. I'm not sure how this stuff works. Maybe someone can help. ~Kvng (talk) 15:37, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Hey Kvng - I noticed this as well. The problem was that the reference in wikidata had extra fields that prevented it from being run through the citation transformation. I just removed that reference and replaced it with a new reference to the FLAC website, which is in keeping with previous entries. Mausmalone (talk) 21:34, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikidata ref broken
Talk:Cardcaptor Sakura characters

message: Does "Characters" really need to be separated from Cardcaptor Sakura into its own page? I know the characters list is long, but I don't think it particularly warrants separating out. Would you mind if I moved it back to how it was?
--Jonathan Drain 01:58, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see why it's necessary, but I know there are links pointing to it. --Darksasami 05:50, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  This is true, but only two - one of those is the link from the original article and the other you added yourself. The latter originally linked to Cardcaptor Sakura entry anyway. --Jonathan Drain 16:32, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Is this writeup necessary?

message: I've created and written new articles for all the listed characters here who didn't have an article previously.  All relevant information in this article has been adapted/merged into the new articles.  All that is left here (as of Part 6) is a list of characters, which is then short enough to move back to the main CCS page.  This article is now a redirect to the characters section in the main page.  --Crisu 02:16, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Deprecation complete
Talk:Fluke (film)

message: "even though it received good reviews, this film performed relatively poorly at the box office, especially for a summer film. Many avid movie-goers regard this film as one of the most underrated in movie history." Is this POV. I hate this film. User:JohnJohn
"I've never heard any movie critic or any person for that matter refer to this movie as 'one of the most underrated in movie history.'"
:Of course it's POV, it's blatant POV and should have been removed before. 172.159.103.129 21:13, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: POV

message: this in an articale: fluke (novel) this article should link to it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Emperoraaron (talk • contribs) 15:10, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  link to novel 

message: I've seen the Reception  section on this article and it clearly have a biased content. I've put some alternatives sources on it. However, English isn't my primary language, so maybe this section may have some grammar mistakes.--Italodal (talk) 04:11, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Supposed Bias 

message: I can't seem to find any reliable sources on this.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.201.47.203 (talk) 22:14, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the dog's fluke in his liver or his intestine? 

message: Although many online sources say that Comet, who both plays Fluke and Comet from Full House, is the same as Buddy from Air Bud, they are NOT the same dog. Buddy does play Comet for 1 episode of Full House, but the rest of the time Comet is played by Comet the dog. 71.30.67.30 (talk) 18:17, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Even Wikipedia’s own source, a Washington Post Article, says that Fluke is Comet. 71.30.67.30 (talk) 18:26, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The dog actor for Fluke
Talk:Noah John Rondeau

message: Quick note on my recent edit:  to improve a sentence about "at least one of [the journals] were in an indecipherable code", I split one paragraph into three and added some more precise information.
About a decade ago, I spent quite a bit of time transcribing into plaintext about a dozen of Rondeau's annual encoded and half-encoded journals.  So I can authoritatively testify that there was more than one coded journal, and that they weren't quite "indecipherable".
Hope that doesn't put me too close to the subject -- I tried hard not to add too much detail... though I'm tempted to supply a non-copyrighted sample image to show what the code looked like; anyone have comments or advice on whether this is a worthwhile addition? --dvgrn 02:03, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it would be a great idea to include an image of some of the code and whatever you know about the subject. —  Nonenmac 02:26, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of Canon products

message: Hi, It lists them as cameras but are'nt they camcorders? 
80.229.241.200 20:27, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A camcorder is a video camera, hence it being listed under cameras.  Gh5046 15:35, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Camcorders?

message: they have a whole range of these but none are listed..  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.83.168.122 (talk) 03:25, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  imageprograf large format printers? 

message: Copied from the article:
"Article needs to be updated for PMA 2009" Logan Talk Contributions 21:48, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update 

message: I have a Pixma iP1900 inkjet printer and it is not listed here.  I have no reason to believe that it's not a Canon product.
Moxo (talk) 22:34, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  iP1900 

message: The articles is too big and is never? completed since February 2009. I recommend to split the article into several articles: Cameras including lenses and flashes, printers and others. It is more convinience for readers and also the contributors who want to complete the article.Gsarwa (talk) 05:28, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Split into several articles
Talk:Galactica (ship)

message: # 20:03, 7 Apr 2005 AlistairMcMillan (Make REDIRECT to Battlestar. We know very little about the actual ship, so this page could never really go anywhere.)
# 11:39, 23 Apr 2005 user:67.68.220.210 If the new Sci-Fi seies doesn't provide details about Galactica, that;ll be a first. Changing to a redirect wasn't very forward looking.
# 14:57, 23 Apr 2005 user:AlistairMcMillan Revert to REDIRECT. Most of this is already covered on Battlestar. We don't need duplication. And the series, so far, hasn't told us much about the ship.
: If you think we know enough about the ship from the series to write a comprehensive article that doesn't include speculation and guesswork, then write the article.  So far we haven't had that.  We've had a stub with NO CONTENT marked with an expansion tag  and then a bunch of content that we already have in other articles and fan speculation.   We already have the Battlestar article that covers the ships perfectly adequately, especially considering we know very little about them. AlistairMcMillan 00:08, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Battlestar is perfectly adequate for describing the specific ship. No separate article is needed. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 13:07, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why we shouldn't have an article on Battlestar Galactica, the ship
Talk:Tracy Caldwell Dyson

message: I was of the understanding that info on the NASA site was free to be copied, so had copied the data over.  I was in the process of adding to it when I found this copyright violation notice... I only posted the info about 5 minutes earlier.  Quick movers!
* I was on RC patrol. Let's see, did you find this on NASA? Because I did a google search and found it on www.astronautix.com, certainly a private website. Maybe they copied it from NASA though; provide the link and I'll revert it. Thanks. --Dmcdevit 04:48, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright Violation?

message: We have a George Dyson in wikipedia, is it the same ? Hektor (talk) 11:41, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: according to this article: http://www.pe.com/localnews/banning/stories/PE_News_Local_D_eastronaut16.30fb691.html he's a "a Navy pilot deployed on the aircraft carrier USS George Washington". So, no, it's not the same! --201.34.229.23 (talk) 14:25, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: George Dyson

message: I've not been able to find a reliable source for this yet, but apparently Brad Lidge (closer for the Philadelphia Phillies) had a live video chat with Dyson (currently on the ISS) today (source). Will keep looking for an WP:RS. -- Scjessey (talk) 20:04, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Videocall with baseball player 

message: In the article, she is alternatingly referred to as 'Dyson', 'Caldwell' and 'Caldwell Dyson'... --Ohconfucius ¡digame! 14:20, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the NASA bio, she is correctly referred to as 'Caldwell Dyson'. -- Scjessey (talk) 14:35, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  How does one address her? 

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Tracy Caldwell Dyson in Cupola ISS.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on August 14, 2012. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2012-08-14. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! —howcheng  {chat} 20:31, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Tracy Caldwell Dyson in Cupola ISS.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon 

message: Do we need to include that Caldwell Dyson believes in God?  The source given just references her using the term God to describe people being put on Earth, and another source here just has her mention her faith.  As there are no further citations about her religious background, it seems like an insignificant detail in her personal life section.  Balon Greyjoy (talk) 10:57, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing the sentence about religion 
Talk:Silver trout

message: Fleshed the article out.  It was just one decontextualized sentence before.  Hm. Mcsweet
I question the assertion of success for the Sunapee Golden Trout.  According to Behnke and some Idaho Fish and Game officials, a few exiled populations exist in remote Idaho mountain lakes.  Should the State of NH ever step up to the plate and reintroduce this long lost native son to Lake Sunapee, then that would be a success along the lines of the Lake Pyramid Lahontan Trout reintroduction.
Regarding this silver trout's genetics, until they test preserved samples (if possible), this char's relationship to relic arctic char and brook trout remains a mystery.  To add more confusion, there's a population of relic char in Maine also called silver trout.  Sunapee Trout (talk) 16:31, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
Talk:Display Data Channel

message: some monitors can have settings ajusted via ddc afaik, like brightness, or trigger a degausing —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.73.99.22 (talk • contribs) 
:You're right.  I added a "DDC/CI" section. --Heron 09:24, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  DDC/CI 

message: Is that section really needed in an article about displays standards? Instructions on how to fix problems with computers should not be part of an encyclopaedia. In my opinion, it should be either removed or rewritten to something like DDC/CI Operating System support, explaining problems that may appear if the standard is not supported by a monitor. Elideb (talk) 14:09, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disabling DDC/CI is not relevant 

message: "DDC2B is unidirectional and allows only one bus master - the graphics adapter." How is that possible? If it truly was unidirectional and the graphics adapter is the bus master, how is the EDID getting from the display to the graphics adapter? Am I misunderstanding bidirectionality in this context? Samorost1 (talk) 16:10, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  DDC2B unidirectional? 

message: A popular program is ClickMonitorDDC. Please include in the article
==== Download Mirrors: ====
* https://clickmonitorddc.en.softonic.com/
* https://www.majorgeeks.com/files/details/clickmonitorddc.html
* https://www.softpedia.com/get/System/System-Miscellaneous/ClickMonitorDDC.shtml
* https://filehippo.com/download_clickmonitorddc/
* https://www.bytesin.com/software/ClickMonitorDDC/
==== Project's website is gone: ====
* Used to be hosted at https://www.clickmonitorddc.bplaced.net/
* ARCHIVE: https://web.archive.org/web/20201016064411/https://clickmonitorddc.bplaced.net/
==== Repositories Mentioning it: ====
* a github with reference to the project's website URL (not the project's code repository): https://github.com/chrismah/ClickMonitorDDC7.2
* a rehost github for zipped executables: https://github.com/nubix/ClickmonitorDDC
Rj.amdphreak (talk) 20:00, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  ClickMonitorDDC 

message: * a github with reference to the project's website URL (not the project's code repository): https://github.com/chrismah/ClickMonitorDDC7.2
* a rehost github for zipped executables: https://github.com/nubix/ClickmonitorDDC
Rj.amdphreak (talk) 20:00, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Repositories Mentioning it:
Talk:Anna Massey

message: According to List_of_civil_parishes_in_West_Sussex, there's a Thakeham there. Are there two of them? ---Isaac R 03:04, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the maps there is only a Thakeham in West Sussex, not in Surrey. It's been listed here as being in Surrey since the first version of this article. I think that's just a mistake that nobody has bothered to correct. -- SteveCrook 17:01, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Birthplace

message: Could someone please tell me if it is Anna Massey who is reading the "Please stand clear of the doors" recorded announcement at Belsize Park tube station in London? Cjcooper (talk) 21:11, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Tube Announcements
Talk:Last Post

message: There seems to be a few request here for a recording of the Last Post so I decided to tweak an existing one on the commons, upload it and add it to this article. Cj005257 (talk) 18:09, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It sounds like a midi thing and not a recording to me. 92.29.119.112 (talk) 11:22, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Correct. :) It is a recording but in a rather limited and perhaps slightly misleading sense. I'll change the label. It could do with a more convincing performance, certainly. I have a better synth performance, but a proper recording of an actual instrument might take longer ... :) DBaK (talk) 07:45, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recording 

message: Well, this is interesting. I reverted these edits because it seemed that what we already said about Last Post and Taptoe contradicted this. But this makes it clear that in at least one MH17 event it was indeed Last Post that was used. I don’t have a ref for two services, nor the WW2 commemoration claim, which still sounds unlikely to me, nor for the usage claim (military vs general). Note, indeed, that the article linked above makes it clear that the usage issue was internationalism, not military/civilian.
So where does this leave us? We have a ref for one bit, but I am not even sure that the article needs to cover this at all – we can’t write about every time it’s played. I’d be interested to read others’ views. Thanks and best wishes DBaK (talk) 13:51, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last Post and Taptoe, again 

message: Is there any reason why there's no mention of how old The Last Post is, when and how it originated?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ianbrettcooper (talk • contribs) 15:04, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The following BBC article provides some information if you or others are interested. The story of the Last Post  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.18.134.184 (talk) 13:32, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  History? 

message: Why is the score in C major, when the article says it should be in B-flat and the recording is too? – filelakeshoe (t / c)  10:49, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah. It's because the bugle is a transposing instrument and music for it is not notated at concert pitch. Very surprising if you haven't encountered it. BPMullins | Talk 02:01, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Score 

message: There is inaccuracy in this description, the music is rhythmically wrong and the reference to Eb is also wrong as there are two versions of the last post one for British Army infantry (Bb version posted here) and one for British Army  cavalry (Eb version mentioned) but they are different calls. I have 32 years experience in Army music as a trumpet player, and have played both, I feel this post needs correcting. The American Taps is of course different again. 2A02:C7E:34BD:EC00:F85E:E6B2:D471:2A1B (talk) 21:53, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Last Post
Talk:Ecological effects of transgenic plants

message: This looks like someone transferred in a favorite paper - but article creation info doesn't appear on the history (User:Petaholmes evidently split the article in two- see Transgenic plants).  I did a little work on the intro, topic sentences and the formating.  The "royal we" needs to be removed, as well as a number of other presentation quirks.  Some POV, but pretty mild.  I think shortening the article as a whole might also be a good idea.  I'll pick at the copy as I find the time.  Comments welcome.  WBardwin 03:28, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source - a college paper?
Wikipedia talk:List of Wikipedians by military branch

message: Copied from Wikipedia:Vandalism in progress
* User:Jmabel
** Vandalised Wikipedia:List of Wikipedians by military branch. Added section that stated "MAKE LOVE NOT WAR". This is NOT the place for political views. Linuxbeak 03:05, Apr 24, 2005 (UTC)
*** I will point out that this is from an editor who seems to think (judging by his or her own edits to that page) that "Army…HOOAH!", "Navy…AYE AYE!", Marine Corps…OOH-RAH!", Air Force…AIR POWER!",, and Coast Guard…AYE AYE!" are NPOV. -- Jmabel | Talk 03:27, Apr 24, 2005 (UTC)
***As you can see, my supposed vandalism included (1) a spelling correction (2) noting the fact that the U.S. Military is not the only military in the world, and (3) an addition which might be argued to be in questionable taste, but I do not believe in the context of the many humorous additions to the various lists of Wikipedians constitutes vandalism. -- Jmabel | Talk 03:37, Apr 24, 2005 (UTC)
<end of copied material>
In short, while I will not reinsert the apparently objectionable passage, I absolutely deny that it constituted vandalism, and believe it was entirely in the spirit common to the various lists of Wikipedians. -- Jmabel | Talk 03:37, Apr 24, 2005 (UTC)
:Not a very tactful move though... Jumping cheese Cont@ct 09:40, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

message: I standardized the list of Wikipedians by removing the piped wikilinks that were different from the username. 
Revert if you like, but please explain. =) Jumping  cheese 04:41, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Usernames 

message: Hi. I know it follows on a bit from the previous topic in which it's pointed out that this is not a User or User Talk page, but what do you think about (1) spelling mistakes and (2) graphics of badges of rank? On spelling, it's quite simple - there's a spelling mistake that I'd like to fix; if it was in an article I would just do so; as this is an odd semi-personal format, I am unclear whether or not I should. On the graphic, someone's just introduced a graphic of a badge of rank. I think this is a bad idea, because if everyone did that the list would look a complete mess very quickly - but I am loth to revert it, again because I don't really feel quite sure what nature of beast this list/article actually is. I'd be interested to hear your views. Best wishes DBaK (talk) 08:15, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: No graphics, please. Too much like high school. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 01:07, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  What kind of an article is this?
Talk:LG

message: Hello,
My name is Edgar Polanco, I own Polanco roofing and home improvement contractor.
bought a range with manufacturing problems over a year ago, they approved a refund do to they can’t fix the issues. But never received my check.
they keep saying it is in the mail.
any chance to get this problem solved?
I am tired of calling LG customer service.
As a contractor and property owner, this is my worse experience.
Cincerely, Edgar Polanco. 2601:84:8481:71F0:F849:D763:20C0:583D (talk) 17:17, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a Wikipedia talk page.  It's for discussing improvements to the encyclopedia article.  If you want tech support, you have to contact the company itself.  This is the wrong website. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:40, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Range defects