Talk:Zyzzyx Road

message: This article list its gross as $20 and List_of_U.S._box_office_bombs gives it at $30, which is it? What counts here the official or unofficial? Madzyzome (talk) 19:39, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The official tally is $30. howcheng  {chat} 03:45, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  This is an interesting article on the subject: .  The film grossed $30.  (There were exactly 6 patrons, presumably at $5 per ticket.)  The producer later reimbursed two of those patrons (a woman who worked on the film as a make-up artist and her friend) of their $10.  So, the film netted $20.   (Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 02:29, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  The relevant section of the article says they six patrons paid one cent (or maybe 1 cent each?). The release and grossing section of the article thus implies a gross of either 1 cent (or 6 cents?), states an unofficial gross of $20, and then mentions a $10 difference (relative to what?).         Jack Vermicelli 68.36.147.128 (talk) 04:23, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  $20 or $30? 

message: I just want everybody to know that, despite what one may think, this is an actual movie, and everything listed in the article is factually correct. This is true as of when I am writing this, about two minutes after starting the article. It actually grossed thirty dollars, check out the links if you don't believe me.
Also, if anybody can get a picture of the poster on the article, it would be appreciated. They have a picture here. 
I don't actually know that much about the movie, so the article needs to be edited. Free-encyclopedia 03:02, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zyzzyx Road 

message: IMDB has the film listed as released in 2005.  Meanwhile, Box Office Mojo and CHUD.com have it as a February 2006 release date.  This may be relevant to the section for "2006 box office gross" since it may have made more money in an initial release a year earlier.  There is also budget and other information at IMDB that could probably be introduced here.  ju66l3r 06:15, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Conflicting release dates

message: :Image:ZyzzyxRoad.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 04:55, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:ZyzzyxRoad.jpg

message: The linked IMBD page gives running time and budget as 90 minutes and $2m, while the article lists them as 88 minutes and $1.3m. The cite for 88 minutes doesn't reference the running time of the film at all (as far as I can tell) and I'm not sure where the $1.3m budget figure came from. Can anyone verify the numbers listed in the article? Otherwise I will update them to match the IMDB ones and fix the cite.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.168.138.233 (talk) 13:39, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflicting Numbers 

message: please let me edit i like to edit and rap Keith Cozart (talk) 02:47, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: this is not the right page to request additional user rights. You may reopen this request with the specific changes to be made and someone may add them for you, or if you have an account, you can wait until you are autoconfirmed and edit the page yourself. Jamedeus (talk) 02:54, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 6 March 2024