lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hannah Logasa

message: I question the need for the tag, "A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject. (June 2017)". Although , who appears to be a nephew of Logasa, edited the article in the last decade, the article history shows his las edit to be in August 2007. I'd appreciate the opinions of other editors who may have additional information on COI issues in this article. Cheers! — Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 21:40, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Up until a week ago, almost all of the content in the article was still written by that user, I don't see why a COI tag isn't appropriate. My AfD may not have been appropriate considering my lack of knowledge of librarian history but a COI tag is absolutely appropriate. - SantiLak (talk) 23:41, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: So, in order to remove the tag, would you require  to declare a COi here? Since it's been almost ten years since his last edit to this article, that seems odd to me.  Cheers! — Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 00:50, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: In order to remove the tag, you should continue to do what you're doing now, finding verifiable material and improving the article from what it was prior. When I read it prior, it felt like it had a minor bias to me, something most likely unintentional by the original author due to the COI. They don't need to declare their COI as their identity has already been self declared (i.e. i'm not outing them) and we know it. To resolve the issue we simply need to clean up the article as you have been doing. They didn't follow COI guidelines originally so we just have to fix what needs to be fixed. - SantiLak (talk) 01:40, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI tag
Talk:WQJM (AM)

message: Per the WP:Disambig page, "If only a primary topic and one other topic require disambiguation, then disambiguation links are sufficient, and a disambiguation page is unnecessary." Since the radio station call letters are the primary identification and the acronym for an organisation founded to foster cooperation in the nuclear industries is a secondary identification, a hat note is sufficient and requires no more steps than would a disambiguation page for people seeking the organisation. - Dravecky (talk) 21:25, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rationale for deletion of disambiguation page
Talk:WNNG-FM

message: The text of the article says this is an Adult Contemporary station branded Sunny 99.9, but the infobox says it is a news-talk station branded The Patriot.  Which is correct?  --R'n'B (call me Russ) 15:01, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Based on the information reported at the Arbitron link, as well as the station's website (wnngthepatriot.com, not included in the article), I'd say the infobox is correct. I'll try to give this a bit of a clean-up when I get home tonight. Mlaffs (talk) 16:50, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing
Talk:Air East

message: Removed speedy deletion threat (why not amend and make the article right instead of proposing deletion?). Confusion caused by whoever added the airline logo which was incorrect and from an aircraft maintenance company Air East Airways. Airline stub article as now as it should be, although it still needs development. Ardfern 17:48, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for resolving the confusion. Addhoc 19:09, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy deletion
Talk:Attacks on U.S. diplomatic facilities

message: Suggested Edits: Widen scope of Article to all attacks on US diplomatic facilities, could then include such incidents as the Camarena affair wherein the DEA facility was co-housed with the US consulate in Mexico, as well as various protests, or intrusions (Lebanon, Tehran).
* I agree. There are many significant attacks that are not terror related that are not listed that should be. Some non-terror attacks such as the mob attack against the US Embassy in Belgrade are already listed.Rsoandrew (talk) 04:20, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Shouldn't there be a reference to the many attacks against the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad?  I know listing each attack would be too much, but there could be mention of how many there have been, if a reference could be found.  I just haven't been able to find a reference yet. ~PescoSo say•we all 20:52, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Baghdad 

message: Why aren't there any countries listed? I think it's important to know which nation the embassy was in at the time of the attack.
174.102.243.129 (talk) 14:26, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Country Listings?
Talk:OTP banka Srbija a.d.

message: I have made a lot of moves and redirects in past hour in order to reflect the legal (but unusual IMO) changes in names of banks owned by Hungarian OTP Bank. As of December 2019, the OTP Bank has acquired three banks in Serbia (with name as it was on Wikipedia, and changed (moved page) name as it is on Wikipedia now; displayed in chronological order by older time of purchase):
* (1) OTP banka Srbija, changed name after completed merger of Vojvođanska banka (2), renamed to Vojvođanska banka a.d.
* (2) Vojvođanska banka, acquired by OTP Bank and merged into OTP banka Srbija (1) and is defunct now, page name remained Vojvođanska banka
* (3) Société Générale Srbija, acquired by OTP Bank and is in the process of merging into Vojvođanska banka a.d. (1), page renamed to OTP banka Srbija a.d. (current article)
--AirWolf talk 11:59, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  OTP Bank subsidiaries name changes
Talk:FK Metalac Gornji Milanovac

message: Sorry I understand the ban is only connected to political issues, but now I understand that it also applies to sport. So I'll stop now.--Nado158 (talk) 21:24, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
Talk:A1 Srbija

message: As I can see on the operator's homepage its name is vip and not Vip mobile. Should not we rename the article page? --Dima1 (talk) 13:40, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Operator's name 
Talk:List of Dublin bridges and tunnels

message: I posted an image View from the Luas Bridge in which you can see another bridge. Which one is it? PeterClarke 22:27, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which Bridge? 
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Dalmatia/Proposed decision

message: I'm not DIREKTOR's advocate neither I'm trying to be, but I must point something: edit warring on Dalmatia related pages is not only question of users behaviour but also question of users honesty. Keep in mind and check it - DIREKTOR was mostly editing according to the talk page discussions, while Giove's edits were mostly irrational. Equalizing of responsibilities for edit warring of these 2 users would be superficiality. Zenanarh 18:02, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: I am Italian and -of course- on the side of Giovanni Giove, but I want to express my opinion that the initial "proposed decisions" against Giovanni Giove and DIREKTOR are excessive. 
Giovanni Giove has made a sustained edit-warring in "Dalmatia" (and related articles like  "Zara/Zadar") because he was (practically alone) against not only DIREKTOR, but even others (Zenanarth, Kubura, No 13, etc..), so his edit-warring interventions are many more than those of anyone of them individually. 
DIREKTOR has shown clever understanding of the other side's opinion (like with me) and should be rewarded for this behavior. In his help allow me to copy what has written GhePeU in the talkpage:  
"......With regard to the object of this request for arbitration, until now I've always been able, in the end, to arrive to a satisfying "middle-ground" with user:DIREKTOR; however there are other users involved in this arbitration who've been prone to revert without even trying to evaluate the other's position; when someone reverts many times the same typo (a very visible "-" before a paragraph), then I think that it's impossible to discuss with them (I'm referring to User:Kubura in Italianization): they don't even read, they just look at the editor and revert to their POV. -- GhePeU 14:36, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please, use Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_arbitration/Dalmatia/Evidence. Kubura 12:49, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment 2
Talk:Edith Hall

message: "A famously humorous and colourful lecturer" and "lively, accessible and politically engaged research" need some attention: see WP:NPOV.  The article could also benefit from citations of sources for the facts mentioned in it, as opposed to just listing two external links.  BencherliteTalk 19:59, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: , and so tag removed.  Thanks. BencherliteTalk 16:45, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality

message: If one went solely by this article it would be easy to imagine that Edith Hall came into this world fully formed on the first day of life at university. Did she not go to school? Did she not have parents? This isn't really a biography at all. It is PR. When people read biographies they tend to want to know what the person has achieved (good so far) but also where the person came from and what might have set the course of their life. This article fails in the latter.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.187.233.172 (talk) 09:11, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where did Edith Hall come from 
Talk:Thomas Marmaduke

message: Seems an adequately sourced article on historically important explorer. DGG (talk) 02:18, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article refers at least twice to its subject being "sent" without saying WHO sent him.  Almost reads like an excerpt from a longer treatise. And although it gives references, it doesn't tie any particular fact to either reference. Needs work. 
And it's author was banned for violation of sockpuppet policies.
 Mwanner | Talk 19:26, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sent by whom?
Talk:Clear Lake (Linn County, Oregon)

message: In case anyone is thinking of adding details on the history of the lake, this source may be helpful.
* 
The PDF version that you can download appears to give a lot of detail on the formation of the lake and geology of the area. Desertborn (talk) 14:04, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potential source for adding history of lake 

message: Why does it say lake was formed by a volcano? The US Fkrext Service Mt Hood website states Clear Lake is not a natural lake it is a reservoir which I'm assuming means man-made.  That's either a pretty serious error or a deception, either way it's disturbing.  It took me 5 minutes to find the correct information.  People come to Wikipedia to get accurate information.  I'm starting to wonder how accurate it is 2601:1C1:8A01:B310:6552:BFB0:C9B7:8F25 (talk) 13:08, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clear Lake Oregon 

message: Oops comment above should read * US Forest Service Mt Hood website states 2601:1C1:8A01:B310:6552:BFB0:C9B7:8F25 (talk) 13:13, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clear Lake Oregon 

message: ....and a guide takes you around and tells you a volcano made it, but the federal government website says it's a reservoir???? I'm confused is it man made or not?!  One more reason I don't trust the government or the history  books anymore 2601:1C1:8A01:B310:6552:BFB0:C9B7:8F25 (talk) 13:17, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clear Lake Oregon
Talk:South Morava

message: The old name of the river was Bulgarian Morava and it is still used in Bulgaria. One excerpt from the book Bulgarians in Southwest Moravia (Classic Reprint) Fb&c Limited, 6.02.2018 by Johann Georg von Hahn written in 1861 confirmes that: "For many years the world has been treated to a Serbo-Bulgarian dispute as to whose are the lands inhabited by the Slavic population in Macedonia; whose are the lands also in the district between the Timok and the Morava; whether the Slavic population of these lands is of Servian or Bulgarian origin. The dispute on these points was begun, in fact, first by the Servians. Its beginning can be placed about 1870. The Bulgarians came forward not to claim something in addition to what was their own, as the Servians did, but to defend that which, in their own circle and among their neighbors, was known for centuries to be Bulgarian and continued unchallenged to be held and cultivated as Bulgarian. The Bulgarians long before this dispute saw and felt for themselves that they were of Bulgarian origin in real Bulgaria (Moesia), in Thrace and in Macedonia, extending into Moesia and the provinces of the Timok, and those along the Bulgarian Morava clear to its junction with the Servian Morava; so that the very designation of the large right (southern) branch of the Morava as Bulgarian Morava showed that in its basin lived or still lives a people with Bulgarian traits, as against the Servian traits of the population in the district. Of the great left (west) fork of the Morava, designated by the title, Servian Morava. These two, we may say, ethnographic designations have disappeared from the new maps of Servia and the Balkan peninusla, thanks to Servian political activity." The term is used also by modern researchers. 
Kyril Drezov, who is lecturer at the Keele University and core researcher of the internationally acclaimed Southeast Europe Unit there, as well as a leading expert on Balkan politics claims that By the end of the nineteenth century Serbia had largely assimilated the 'floating' populations along the rivers Timok and South Morava (previously known as Bulgarian Morava), and turned its attention to Macedonia. For more: J. Pettifer, The New Macedonian Question, St Antony's, Springer, 1999, ISBN 0230535798, p. 53. Jingiby (talk) 19:13, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bulgarian Morava 

message: Seemed reasonable to mention of name "Bulgarian Morava" provided with the sources is placed in separate section.Klačko (talk) 20:10, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok. I have added explanation on the origin of this name. Regards. Jingiby (talk) 05:54, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  New section "Other names"
Template talk:Infobox water transit

message: something's gone wrong with the image sizing in this template - images are coming up about 600px. Don't know how to fix it but can someone take a look at it? Thanks.
See Staten Island Ferry or Woolwich Ferry for examples of how it's rendering. Cnbrb (talk) 12:58, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Well, in spite of the lack of replies, someone fixed Staten Island - it looks like you have to remove the "px" from the image_size parameter (i.e. image_size=300 and not image_size=300px). Cnbrb (talk) 00:12, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  image size broken
Talk:Slavija Square

message: Dimitrije Tucović Square is not official name, it is former name. Square has been renamed. --Tadijataking 10:54, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dimitrije Tucović Square 
Talk:Terazije

message: The author of many of the articles about Belgrade applies this term to almost any building built after ww2. Most of the buildings he describes as being Socialist Realist are actually modernist/international style buildings, which this author may not like, or may indeed be of mediocre quality (and most were indeed built cheaply, due to great demand for buildings in the city which was both bombed heavily in 41 and 44, and was experiencing a massive uncontrolled growth after 45). Socialist realism in itself is not even applied to architectural styles, but commonly it refers to neo-classicist or beaux-arts buildings constructed in the 1930's to mid 50's in Soviet Union. The only building in Belgrade that fits this description is the Trade Unions building on the Nikola Pašić square, and even that is debatable, because the building's architecture very closely follows the Pre-war building of the Museum of Serbian History (once of Yugoslav History).
Author has also issued, in this case, completely unwarranted criticism of the post war reconstruction of Terazije square. Whilst there are people nostalgic of everything that has to do with the 'old' (pre ww2) Belgrade, fact is that even before war, massive demolition of smaller buildings was done, in order for greater architectural uniformity to be achieved, which is what was done to Terazije after WW2, with very solid results.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.157.213.138 (talk) 12:49, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Socialist Realism Architecture 
Talk:Dursey Island

message: Is the Dursey cable car the only one to go over water in Europe?    Might there be some that go over lakes?   Perhaps sea water should be substituted for water.  But this is just a pedantic point.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.155.193.205 (talk) 13:32, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The Norsjö aerial tramway in northern Sweden has 3 km over lakes and streams, and in Barcelona, an aerial tramway crosses the harbour via the Torre Jaume I. --AHert (talk) 19:04, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Water or Sea Water? 

message: The large picture of the island nicely shows the two support pillars and both stations of the cable car (near the parked cars). --AHert (talk) 19:04, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cable Car on Island's picture 

message: Two different population figures are given in the article.  It first refers to a permanent population of 12 or so people and later to a population of 6 to 8 people. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Coolavokig (talk • contribs) 05:03, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population of Dursey 

message: The cable car was reopened at the start of the month. Sorry, don't have time to edit atm.
https://www.rte.ie/news/2023/0609/1388240-cable-car-dursey-island/ Dahamsta (talk) 14:27, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks . I've updated and added a short note to reflect that source. Guliolopez (talk) 23:45, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! Dahamsta (talk) 12:44, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cable car re-opened
Talk:Cabinteely

message: This is more a list than an article. Any objections if I wipe the lists? (Sarah777 16:01, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Have attempted to tidy up the worst WP:LINKFARM and WP:NOTGUIDE issues. The "bus guide" was particularly problematic in this regard. Guliolopez (talk) 00:16, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Well done!  There are a fair few other articles (unless something has changed in my last few, not-very-logged-in months) which could benefit from similar...  SeoR (talk) 22:08, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Kam (rapper)

message: Shouldnt Kam's real name be in the article? Preferably in the beginning?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Knarris (talk • contribs) 15:57, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 
Talk:Inishbofin, County Donegal

message: To User:Tropicanmanofthesea and anyone else who is editing this article - please note that this article, as it was originally written, and as it now stands, is about the island just off the coast near Falcarragh. If there is another island of the same name 37.84 miles offshore (or 37.34, or 37.54, depending on which version of the "revised" text, and which sentence, you are reading), and if there are tales about the famine and scientific research associated with it, let's have another article about it, and let's agree on two distinct titles, one for each article. But please do not insert lots of nonsense into this article, with photos of Tory Island and Slovenian forests. By all means add information, but do not simply turn the article into a work of fiction. Thank you. Snalwibma (talk) 06:18, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fact and fiction 
Talk:Southeastern University

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) BilledMammal (talk) 13:09, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Southeastern University (Florida) →  – Already redirects here. This is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. It is the only current school by this exact name so no title disambiguator is necessary. Rreagan007 (talk) 02:12, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the hatnote is sufficient for the defunct university. Rreagan007 (talk) 08:15, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 9 August 2023
Talk:MTV (Adria)

message: According to  MTV Adria was also renamed to just MTV. wexy (talk) 12:27, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name change 
Talk:Omey Island

message: Material here should be detached and factual.  Advertising is not permitted.  If anyone wants to write a tourist guide, please go to Wikitravel.  Material which does not comply with the Wikipedia:manual of style and WP:Wikipedia is not will be deleted. --Red King (talk) 01:20, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia is not a tourist guide 

message: User:Diallin deleted the link to http://www.360eire.com/360eire/Connacht/Gaillimh/conamara/conamarathuaidh/iomai/iomai.html on the basis that it is a 'foreign lanaguage site'. For a start off, I know of no en.wiki policy that says links to external sites, however useful, should be deleted because they are in English. There are many of these all over Wikipedia. And just as a 'by the way', Irish is not a foreign language to readers in Ireland.  Nevertheless, I am not reverting the deletion, but only because the image is not illustrative of Omey Island. --Red King (talk) 21:18, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  deletion of 360 degree imaging
Talk:Blasket Islands

message: The article could do with further information on why the islands' population was 'evacuated'. 87.113.32.235 (talk) 23:52, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Its elaborated upon in the Great Blasket Island article; In April 1947, having been cut off from the mainland for weeks due to bad weather, the islanders made an emergency call to the Taoiseach, Éamon de Valera, urgently requesting supplies which duly arrived two days later by boat. 90.142.144.88 (talk) 17:11, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: 1953 evacuation

message: Flower connects the name to a supposed ON word "brasker", but I couldn't find it in any dictionary. "Dangerous" is hættr, place staðr. EamonnPKeane (talk) 16:50, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Placename

message: Not sure what is the best image size for the map of the islands on the page from this file :File:Oileain na mBlascaod.png. Please change it to whatever is better! 2ManyCats4Me (talk) 10:56, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image size for map file File:Oileain na mBlascaod.png
Talk:Beiginis

message: The picture used in this article shows Beginish near Valentia Island and not Beginish in the Blasket Islands.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.0.204.206 (talk) 03:16, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good catch! I have removed the offending picture. I must have one of the Blasket Beginish somewhere. I'll find it, scan it, and upload it - soon! Snalwibma (talk) 07:46, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture
Talk:Inishtooskert

message: Funny that an island article has a mountain infobox. Decide whether this should be an article of an island (primary) with a notable mountain on it (secondary), or of a mountain (primary) on some island (secondary).--Ratzer (talk) 21:55, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I added the island infobox as a primary infobox, leaving the mountain infobox too.--Pampuco (talk) 14:01, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  island or mountain
Talk:Little Skellig

message: The picture shown as "Little Skellig" ist actually Skellig Michael. So it should be replaced. 93.122.78.58 (talk) 13:04, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: You are correct - it took a bit of study to be sure. Because of this single article, an image search brings up the image as "Little Skellig" numerous times in a large variety of publications. Wiki spreading fake news!  Sarah777 (talk) 13:26, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: How about this pic from the Breton wikipedia? 84.71.69.156 (talk) 21:34, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong Picture