Talk:Radeon X1000 series

message: The X1000 series is a brand new core technology. I plan to use this new page to tidy up a lot of the ATI content. Timharwoodx 20:08, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

message: I have no idea how to change this but the X1900XT and X1900XTX are codenamed R580 and should not be listed under cores for R520.
It's still based on the R520. In fact, there shouldn't be another article about a seperate GPU unless it's really another generation. The R520 and R580 are in the same generation, the R500. Do we go around at nVidia GPU's, putting the G71 (I believe this is the GeForce 7600GT) in a different article? No. I think nVIDIA made like multiple revisions on the NV60 core, yet they're still in the same area. Just because it's under a different code name, doesn't make it totally different and seperate article worthy. This article is meant for GPU's that are either based on the R520, or that is within the same generation. Want examples? The R420 series. There's an R480, but is that in a seperate article? No.
So why don't we name the article R500? Then everyone's happy.
:R580 is here because it is in the same family as R520. For the most part, they are extremely similar chips. The ATI articles are all named after the first high-end GPU core of the family. And, R500 is NOT a chip that really exists at all. The Xbox 360 GPU was known as R500 for a while (later "C1", now Xenos) and is the closest part that fits that title. It is totally different than the R520 series. Do not put all of this into some R500 article. It would be plain wrong. --Swaaye 19:42, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  R580 core mistakenly listed as R520 

message: The clockspeeds for the X1300Pro seem to be wrong- (they're higher than everything else)
The Adept 18:45, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect clockspeeds? 

message: Wouldn't it be helpful if someone added the base prices?
Naw, this isnt pricegrabber. Plus they change too frequently. Deusfaux 04:09, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Other

message: I know they're far too away from mainstream, but should this article mention those "variants" a little bit...? Such as the "X1950 Pro Dual"... --202.40.137.201 02:23, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pro Duals 

message: Sorry I'm a newbie and this is my first wiki-idea.
I'm a user at notebookreview.com,and people there are really fed-up with lack of ATI.AMD support for X1700,people are forced to edit catalyst mobility drivers and force it to support X1700 or download the drivers from their notebook providers (ASUS and Samsung are one's that I am aware of).
So it's good to add a bit of criticism about lack of support for X1700.
Thank you all. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.253.137.5 (talk) 19:29, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  X1700 not supported by ATI 

message: Does anyone know what the next ATI line is? I seem to recall seeing an article on it, but there are no links to it (if it does exist) here or on the main ATI page. Maury 18:40, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: [[Radeon R600]. --202.71.240.18 09:28, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What comes next? 

message: I can't find any information about RV550 with Universal Video Decoder. I heard that RV550 was for OEM only. Is that true? --202.71.240.18 09:28, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about RV550? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Radeon X1000 series. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090507152259/http://support.amd.com:80/us/gpudownload/windows/Legacy/Pages/radeonaiw_vista64.aspx?type=2.4.1&product=2.4.1.3.7&lang=English to http://support.amd.com/us/gpudownload/windows/Legacy/Pages/radeonaiw_vista64.aspx?type=2.4.1&product=2.4.1.3.7&lang=English
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:58, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on Radeon X1000 series. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070509182231/http://ati.amd.com/products/mobilityradeonx1300/specs.html to http://ati.amd.com/products/mobilityradeonx1300/specs.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070325135619/http://ati.amd.com/products/mobilityradeonx1350/specs.html to http://ati.amd.com/products/mobilityradeonx1350/specs.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070615160631/http://ati.amd.com/products/mobilityradeonx1400/specs.html to http://ati.amd.com/products/mobilityradeonx1400/specs.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070603210648/http://ati.amd.com/products/mobilityradeonx1450/specs.html to http://ati.amd.com/products/mobilityradeonx1450/specs.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070526105941/http://ati.amd.com/products/mobilityradeonx1700/specs.html to http://ati.amd.com/products/mobilityradeonx1700/specs.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070622124322/http://ati.amd.com/products/mobilityradeonx1600/specs.html to http://ati.amd.com/products/mobilityradeonx1600/specs.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080517011912/http://www.x.org/docs/AMD/R5xx_Acceleration_v1.3.pdf to http://www.x.org/docs/AMD/R5xx_Acceleration_v1.3.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:45, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified