Template talk:Space

message: I ported this over from wikisource as . Seems useful for when a wikitable is contraindicated, yet one wants to line up several short columns of material. Indent can NOT be used in-line because of the leading ''.  This is at genesis the only difference between the two.
Displaying with nowikis:
----

{{ #switch: {{{1}}}
| 0 = 
| 1 =   
| 2 =    
| 3 =     
| 4 =      
| 5 =       
| 6 =        
| 7 =         
| 8 =          
| 9 =           
| 10 =            
| 11 =             
| 12 =              
| 13 =               
| 14 =                
| 15 =                 
| 16 =                  
| 17 =                   
| 18 =                    
| 19 =                     
| 20 =                      
| 21 =                       
| 22 =                        
| 23 =                         
| 24 =                          
| 25 =                           
| 26 =                            
| 27 =                             
| 28 =                              
| 29 =                               
| 30 =                                
| 
}}<noinclude>[[Category:Uncategorised templates]]</noinclude>

I suggested over there at wikisource that the category ought to be 'Pretty print' or the like, along the lines of a pretty print program or filter in Computer Science, esp. used in the bad old days for C, C++, etc. 
Best regards, <B>Fra</B>nkB 21:33, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Genesis June 07, 2006

message: ;echoed from the commons... where something is broken.
#... xy  1_z 
#... xy  2_z 
#... xy  3_z 
#... xy  4_z 
#... xy  5_z 
#... xy  6_z 
#... xy  7_z 
#... xy  8_z 
#... xy  9_z 
#... xy  10_z 
#... xy  11_z 
#... xy  12_z
-apparently, something's also now broken here today too above '5'! // <B>Fra</B>nkB 15:59, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Demo/Test

message: It is not clear what this is all about. What is the meaning of n spaces in a proportional font? In a non-
proportional font, why not just use spaces, like
   99
  100
 1234
Patrick 00:13, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Not clear

message: I stumbled on this template thinking "Wouldn't it be nice to have some template which produces a thin space, an en space or an em space without having to type the whole "{{unicode|&..." out?  What should I call it ..."
Lo & behold the template already existed but with a different purpose ... though it's not as if its a vastly different purpose.  Now, here's what I have in mind.  Let's have this as a dual purpose template.  Instead of my going and making a whole new template (and call it what?) let me add to this one.  Here's what I'm thinking of adding (into the "").
|thin=
|th=
|t=
|en=
|n=
|em=
|m=
I don't think that this will cause confusion or detract in any other way from the template.  Note: I've given alternatives (e.g. "thin", "th" or just "t")—why not?  It only makes things easier to use. Jɪmp 08:41, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: More

message: What do twelve spaces look like using this template?
][	12 s
][	6 s
][	4 s
][	3 s
][	2 s
][	1 
*][
*][
The template is using a mix of ordinary spaces non-breaking spaces and em spaces thus we've got this strange disproportionality.  , for example, is not twice but (about) four times the width of .  Is there a purpose to this? Jɪmp 18:06, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Six of one ≠ half a dozen of the other

message: Please add the protection template to this template inside the  tags at the end, not to its documentation page. The reason I removed it from there is because that documentation page is used for other, non-protected, templates as well and caused an error there. Thank you. Debresser (talk) 12:17, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: . — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:45, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks. Debresser (talk) 12:56, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protection template 

message: Why not give a default value.  should give the same result as  ManishEarthTalk • Stalk 12:09, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Default 

message: See Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)#Should_the_underscore_be_used_as_mark-up_for_non-breaking_spaces.3F ManishEarthTalk • Stalk 12:10, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion 

message: This template is hosed.  See Template:Space/comparison for a thorough investigation of just how broken it is.
Please replace the template with the properly tested version at Template:Space/sandbox (as of this writing).  The new code works cross-platform, cross-browser, at any font size and regardless of font and regardless of unicode support; it does not allow linebreaks, which defeat the purpose of the template; it actually works up to  the way it was supposed to; it will not play tricks on small-screened mobile devices to prevent them from collapsing whitespace that they cannot handle; it has a default value, as was requested a long time ago.  Basically, every problem reported here, and others besides, are now fixed.
Demo:
:Space meonce
:Space methrice
:Space me15 times, bay-bay.
:<drum roll>
— SMcCandlish   Talk⇒ ʕ(Õلō)ˀ  Contribs. 02:23, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.  Please make sure that the template does what you expected it to do.  Nyttend (talk) 12:30, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I did notice I had to change  to margin-left:6em in this edit. Otherwise, everything looked like it was too far to the left. I'm sure there is a technical explanation! --Funandtrvl (talk) 15:31, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overhaul 

message: On 13 March 2012, I changed the doc subpage, Template:Space/doc to match the current operation of the overhauled version, as inserting multiple non-breaking spaces "   ...". To remind users of the difference, I added new doc section "History" to note that formerly (for 6 years), the template had inserted em-spaces or a mix of   and regular spaces, etc. I also noted that the common interwiki Template:In5 can be used to insert wrappable spaces, as purposely designed to auto-reduce the spacing when used on narrow windows. -Wikid77 (talk) 16:43, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Updated doc subpage to match overhaul

message: Template  has a similar (or the same) purpose as this template, but contrary to this template (which uses an ugly method) is uses a better code. Could  better serve as a redirect to that template? --Götz (talk) 19:19, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Similar template 

message: As stated above last month, this template is a duplicate of . Thus, it meets speedy deletion criteria under "T3. Duplication and hardcoded instances." Please add . A redirection from this template to  will work, as both templates use the same syntaxis. --Götz (talk) 16:44, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Partly done: I agree with the redirection proposal, and I have implemented it. We can't delete the template, though, as it has 22,000 transclusions at the moment. Also, the template is not quite an identical copy, as it now has different behaviour if the first positional parameter is not a number. For example, previously the code  would have produced  , but now it will produce an error. These errors are tracked in the category :Category:Errors reported by Module String, though, so I didn't think this too big a risk. If you could keep an eye on the category for any new errors, it would be appreciated. Best — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 14:22, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I will, thanks! --Götz (talk) 19:36, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request db-t3 

message: Leave a blank second line (a newline at that) and please add this on the third line:
 stranger195 (talk • contribs • guestbook) 05:16, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Done — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 20:48, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 17 March 2018