lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Moving scam

message: The core problems with the recently reverted edits were that they were badly in violation of our WP:NPOV guidelines, completely unsourced (see WP:RS), and written in a rambling, incoherent manner that detracted from the encyclopedic tone expected from articles here. Again, the half-crazed rant was laden with weasel words and serious WP:NPOV issues - for instance "like the five crime families of N.Y." It would be great to have something that can be thoroughly sourced about what may or may not be inaccurate about the claims made by the popular press about this sort of scam. However, as it stands, the entire article is unsourced and unreferenced, but the additions were plainly little more than an attack on specific companies and a half-crazed rant. MrZaiustalk 17:33, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

message: These paragraphs seems to violate the guideline against how-to so I moved them to talk. RJFJR (talk) 14:00, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: How to
Talk:Al Akhawayn University

message: Did you know parts of this page have been lifted directly from their International student handbook?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Greenblade99 (talk • contribs) 00:56, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

message: The whole of the section 'About AUI' is copied directly from this page on the university website. I'm removing it per WP:COPYVIO. If the material was added by the copyright owner, i.e. a bona fide representative of the university, they can restore the text but proof of their status and authority to do so will be needed. Even if the text is restored it will need editing as it does not meet Wikipedia standards on neutral POV. I know this represents losing about three-quarters of the article's content, but under the circumstances there is no alternative. Enaidmawr (talk) 22:30, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Massive copyright violation?

message: I was wondering if Montana State University should be added. I'm not sure, or I would have done it myself.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by MysticMetal (talk • contribs) 23:12, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Partnerships 

message: I tried to find some more secondary sources and came accross this... 
https://www.moroccoworldnews.com/2021/06/342748/al-akhawayn-university-loses-us-funding-over-mishandling-of-sexual-harassment-cases 
Should I add a controversies section?Reabrooker (talk) 15:28, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposal of controversies section
File talk:Karaman.png

message: This isn't Karaman's flag.This is an Israel's star.Not the Karaman ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheRiverBelow (talk • contribs) 14:13, 23 October 2007
: No, it is an historic flag of :Karamanoğlu.  See also :File:Karamanid Dynasty flag.svg — Athaenara  ✉  04:30, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Zagazig University

message: I recognize this university because the english version of its website previously used an exact copy of Virginia Tech's website. Most of the VT material was even intact for a good while... I think that I even have a screenshot.
68.180.94.254 (talk) 16:08, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  website 
Talk:Nile University

message: Nile University (NU) was established in 2006 and officially inaugurated in January 2007 and became a non-governmental autonomously managed (Ahleya) university in 2014 (Presidential Decree # 123/2014). NU was then one of the very first Ahleya, and non-profit universities in Egypt conceived - to this day - to be a leader in technology and business education in Egypt and the Middle East/North Africa (MENA) region. 
The development of Nile University dates to the turn of the century when a group of community leaders foresaw the need to establish a leading-edge non-profit university dedicated to the advancement of higher education and applied research in sectors of strategic importance to the economy. Egypt has been in need of a growing need for technically capable and well-qualified personnel, who are educated and trained to meet development demands in a dynamically changing global marketplace. Enhancing the nation’s technological resources, particularly in highly skilled areas, is critical to the country’s goal of sustainable economic growth, which was the role Nile University sought to play. نبيلة خاطر (talk) 09:08, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changing History Part 

message: We kindly need to change the Nile University's old logo on wiki with the new one exisiting on its website Nile University نبيلة خاطر (talk) 09:50, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nile University's Official Logo
Talk:Misr International University

message: Editors,
Please be aware that the section titled Criticism is contentiously being removed for, while it might seem to be for a no apparent reason, what looks to be censorship reasons. People do not like to be criticized but while the information is held to be well cited, it is Wikipedia's policy that information not be deleted because of "hard feelings".
I suggest that this article put restrictions on who can edit it unless they justify a good enough reason for the aforementioned section to be removed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Typer85 (talk • contribs) 19:50, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undoing Sections Presenting True Information
Talk:Danel

message: * Content: The article says he appears in a 14th century BCE text, but nothing about what is known or supposed of his origins. Is he considered invented at that time? Invented much earlier? Based on a real person and gradually mythified? Or is it just established that nothing is known about that? I think it should be explicited, even if as a single sentence.
* Form: As you may know, since you are the first main contributor of this article, Wikipedia rule is that you have the right to choose/dictate the citation style used in the article (now I feel like I'm Mirandazing you ;-) That's why I'll just explain a suggested change in the format of your References section: since you use refs such as "Walton 1994" or "Day 1980", it would be easier on the reader to switch to an author-date format, such as:
:* Walton, John H. (1994). Ancient Israelite Literature in Its Cultural Context: A Survey of Parallels, "Personal Archives and Epics": Canaanite .2 (Zondervan), p. 49.
It makes it easier to find a given ref, especially when a same author starts having multiple works cited. As you may be aware, there are also the handy  and  templates that implement APA or Harvard. (And if you feel adventurous, you can have a look at the Harvard/MLA hybrid I used on Emir Rodríguez Monegal ;-))
But of course, the citation format is your prerogative on this article. — Komusou talk @ 17:50, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Two suggestions

message: The Hebrew Wiki article says that in the past this was called the Legend of Danel, but that in light of new discoveries, they now consider Aqhat to predominate and that the name was changed accordingly. Can anyone confirm? Many thanks in advance. El_C 02:23, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Epic of Aqhat?

message: Why is this not here.: "in both Ugaritic and Hebrew texts, it is correctly Danel" as shown in the article Ugaritic. Misty MH (talk) 18:56, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is this not here? "in both Ugaritic and Hebrew texts, it is correctly Danel"
Talk:Matsudaira Munehide

message: I removed the following from the article because   
* Munehide's father, Matsudaira Muneakira, had also been Kyoto shoshidai (1828-1832) ...?
It was inconsistent with the list of Kyoto shoshidai at the University of Tübingen website on which I relied:
* Mizuno Tadakuni (水野忠邦),　1794-1851 -- Kyoto shoshidai: December 21, 1826- December 28, 1828
* Matsudaira Sukemoto (松平資始) -- Kyoto shoshidai: December 28,1828 - July 4, 1831 ...?
* Ōta Suketomo (太田資始), 1799-1867 -- Kyoto shoshidai: July 4, 1831 - May 19, 1834 ...?
There is another small question -- plausibly related
* Matsudaira Muneakira (1828-1832)
* Ōta Sukemoto (1832-1834)←← Could this be Ōta Suketomo, rather than Sukemoto?<:ref>Hall, John. The Cambridge History of Japan, p. 142.</ref>
This can be easily restored, of course, if it can only be verified. --Tenmei (talk) 18:22, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Matsudaira Muneakira
Talk:Monkey: Journey to the West

message: The external links seem to be rather messed up at the moment. Can someone take a look and decide what's best for these links? Thanks. peterismeok 18:04, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: External Links

message: I think it should be mentioned that the O2 run was a shortened version of the opera. I will source this if necessary. 84.157.181.59 (talk) 15:27, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  O2 run 
Talk:Real Money Trader

message: i am disputing this due to the fact that it is something people need a definition for, especially those who play online games. i do intend to do further things with this page, but as it stands now, i am unable to for i am on a Government computer and my resources are limited. I also do not yet have my personal internet yet but will soon.(Cintaru 18:19, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Camp Topridge

message: Which county is Camp Topridge in?  Currently it appears in neither the List of Registered Historic Places in Franklin County, New York, nor the List of Registered Historic Places in Essex County, New York.  Perhaps it is a historic or new name for Camp Dudley, mentioned in one of those?  doncram 18:32, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, its definitely in Franklin County.  I will add it to the appropriate list. Mwanner | Talk 20:26, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Erm, it was there, though its location was misspelt-- it is Keese Mill, not Keese Hill. I fixed it.  Mwanner | Talk 20:30, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: For classifying and cross-listing, what is the location/historic name of Camp Topridge?
Talk:Mehar Mittal

message: Someone should fix this. Words and phrases such as "ultimate" and "but he didn't" with an exclamation mark are definitely out of the question. I put the template on, so I suppose I shouldn't do it. Temperalxy 18:31, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV
Talk:First Parliament of the United Kingdom

message: The UK was formed in 1707. Great Britain was never officially styled the "Kingdom of Great Britain". From the beginning of 1801, "and Ireland" was added to the style and the Irish Parliament abolished. The words, "and Ireland" were replaced with "and Northern Ireland", in about 1927, after the creation of the Irish Free State [6.12.22], which is now known as "The Republic of Ireland". --—Preceding unsigned comment added by Dimadick (talk • contribs) 13:34, 25 September 2008 
:Wrong: the UK was formed in 1801. See  United Kingdom. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 23:59, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: The United Kingdom of Great Britain

message: What's up with the results here? If Pitt's supporters had 6 seats, they should be third, not second, and either way that certainly doesn't constitute 17.4% of the seats.--Pig house (talk) 18:13, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: If nobody objects, I'm going to re-arange the parties and remove the percentages, which I can only see causing confusion for readers.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pig house (talk • contribs) 15:45, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

text: Oh, and since this was (in Britain) essentially a co-option of the 1796 Parliament, shouldn't the results be the same as for that election, not 1802, which was a fresh election and no doubt saw different results?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pig house (talk • contribs) 15:50, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Results? 

message: Should this article be titled as a general election? There was no election. 119.236.141.31 (talk) 21:10, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  An election?
Talk:Jeffery Taubenberger

message: Hi guys,
I'm not sure who's actually responsible for this, but the following section doesn't make sense to me:
"The genome of the flu virus includes about 13,000 base pairs, which had decayed into pieces as small as 100 base pairs. In order to make PCR work, primers have to be constructed, i.e. a short bit of DNA with mirror sequences of the sequence at the two end points of the fragment. They bind to the fragment, and with the help of a polymerase bases are added between the primers to make a copy. The millions of copies of the gene segment are labelled with a radioactive probe as they are being made. They can then be separated on a thin gel by running an electric current across the gel. The radioactive labels create a black mark on an X-ray film which is put over the gel."
So whilst PCR (polymerase chain reaction) effectively fills in the gap between the two primers, it doesn't actually work like that. It's DNA replication, therefore each strand is extended from one of the two primers. As for labelling with a radioactive probe...kind of, that method of sequencing isn't used any more, but the technique is still valid. It's basically termination sequencing where each fragment terminates in a radioactive isotope, so in practice with lots of fragments of varying length you can read the sequence. BUT this is separate from PCR! It follows on from that, to sequence the fragment.
Hope this makes sense
Tim  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.48.60.6 (talk) 12:40, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion in the text 

message: Hello. I apologize for making an unsolicted edit, which was a question, if Dr. Carter had been the author of stranger than fiction. I was looking for the book mentioned and stumbled upon another person named Dr. Crane. Since my edit may have been wrong, since it was taken back almost immediately, I wanted to ask, if changes are taken back because of formatting, or because of further knowledge and other sources. And if there is a source regarding Dr. Carter being the real author, to give some reference. Thanks! 46.223.196.184 (talk) 21:26, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dr Stephen Carter and Dr Leonard Crane
Talk:ErgoGroup

message: There cannot be any doubt about the notability of this company. It is the second largest ITC operations/consulting company in Norway, with 3,300 employees and a revenue in 2006 of NOK 3.6 billion. Also, the company is a former government agency of Norway and later a government enterprise. Further there are multiple third-party articles concerning the company are cited as sources for part of this information. Arsenikk 18:45, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: There is a reference in Norwegian to http://www.ergogroup.no/default.aspx?path={346B74C8-778F-4308-9AD7-2EECE9A19B5D} in the History section that is dead and needs to be updated.  It would be valuable if a bilingual editor would do so.My Gussie (talk) 16:04, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference update by a bilingual editor wanted 
Talk:St. Sebaldus Church, Nuremberg

message: I've run across a number of references to a "Sebaldusschule" in Nuremberg, which seems to have been somewhat important across several centuries. I presume it was a school associated with this church? If so, does anyone have any information they can add about it? --Delirium (talk) 21:54, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  school
Talk:Ware Group

message: I'm not familiar with the following refs which i now copy from Harold Ware#References. Since the material i put in the accompanying article came from that article, i expect suitable refs for the accompanying article can be found among them:
* Earl Latham, The Communist Controversy in Washington: From the New Deal to McCarthy (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1966), 101–123.
* Joseph Lash, Dealers and Dreamers (New York: Doubleday, 1988), 218. 
* Nathaniel Weyl, Treason: The Story of Disloyalty and Betrayal in American History (Washington, D.C.: Public Affairs Press, 1950).
* Nathaniel Weyl, The Battle Against Disloyalty (New York: Crowell, 1951).
* John Earl Haynes and Harvey Klehr, Venona: Decoding Soviet Espionage in America (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1999).  
* Cold War Intelligence
* "Testimony" of Whittaker Chambers before the House Committee on Un-American Activities, August 3, 1948
--Jerzy•t 19:12, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: The article should maybe try to show that during the 1950s, anti-semites consistently made links between Communism and Judaism. It also appears that there were several Jews within the Ware Group. Editors should consider explaining this phenomenon with appropriate socio-historical sources. ADM (talk) 00:19, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Role of Jews
Talk:Bill & Peter's Bogus Journey

message: :GA review (see here for criteria)
#It is reasonably well written.
#:a (prose):  b (MoS): 
#:: 
#It is factually accurate and verifiable.
#:a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
#:: 
#It is broad in its coverage.
#:a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
#:: 
#It follows the neutral point of view policy.
#:Fair representation without bias: 
#:: 
#It is stable.
#:No edit wars etc.: 
#:: 
#It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
#:a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
#:: 
#Overall: 
#:Pass/Fail: 
#:: </div>
:Another decent good article. Good job! --Maxim(talk) 15:47, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA review 

message: Bill & Ted's Bogus Journey? Probably is. 24.233.254.51 (talk) 05:22, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The name of this epsiode a reference to? 

message: Under cultural references, consider adding the information that in the gym where Peter goes, the two trainers work out to the song "Alley Cat" by Bent Fabricius Bjerre. Bent Fabricius player is a Danish composer and funny enough, the song "Barbie Girl" (which is also used in this episode), is also written by Danish composers. 87.63.228.190 (talk) 22:13, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference to Alley Cat 
Talk:Pulse tube refrigerator

message: Yes! No need for both, and "refrigerator" article much more developed. Will change link on Cryocooler page to point to "refrigerator" article instead. Gmarsden 19:04, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cryocooler/refrigerator merge 

message: The invention was 21 years earlier in 1963 (see history in http://alexandria.tue.nl/extra2/200011540.pdf): W. E. Gifford, R. C. Longsworth: Pulse-tube refrigeration. Journal: Trans ASME. 1964, pp 264–268
-- 78.49.150.164 (talk) 10:41, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Invention
Talk:Fred Eckhardt

message: Addtional time is requested to solicit help in completing the entry as well as confirming facts.
:Fair enough but if you have no content to add, there is really no point in having an article. Please make sure that Eckhardt meets this guideline and in particular that there exists sufficient third-party work about his career to warrant an article. Pascal.Tesson 19:22, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Aggregation problem

message: Kreps goes on to say, "So what can we say about aggregate demand based on the hypothesis that individuals are preference/utility maximizers? Unless we are able to make strong assumptions about the distribution of preferences or income throughout the economy (everyone has the same homothetic preferences for example) there is little we can say. ..” The strong assumptions are that everyone has the same tastes and that each person’s taste remain the same as income changes so each additional income is spent exactly the same way as all previous dollars. As Keen notes the first assumption amounts to assuming that there is a single consumer the second that there is a single good. Kleen further states  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.230.55.219 (talk) 12:02, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kreps,  Keen or Kleen ? 

message: Aside from other problems (such as lack of inline citations and a good bit of original research), this article repeatedly confuses necessary and sufficient conditions. 
For example: First to sum the demand functions it must be assumed that they are independent - no, it must not be assumed although it usually is. It is possible that interdependent individual demand functions can be summed up though this usually requires additional assumptions and specific functional forms.
Another example: the summation produces a smooth aggregate curve only if the individual curves have identical shapes - it's not an "only if". And of course "smooth" should be defined, but generally you can gets smooth aggregate curves in a lot of other cases. For example with "many" agents with widely idiosyncratic tastes/demands, you can get a smooth curve if their idiosyncrasies cancel each other out (Alan Kirman somewhere states that aggregation works best if people are identical OR if they are very very heterogeneous - it's the in between that causes problems).
Furthermore, these two aspects aren't all that important to the aggregation problem. Most of the work that deals with interdependent demand functions, like consumption externalities, doesn't spend much time worrying about aggregation problems and rather skips right to studying the properties of the aggregate. Likewise, smoothness is nice, mostly because you can take a derivative and such but it is non-essential for most applications.
What's really important for aggregation of demands is basically in the last section. However Keen is not an authority or a reliable source here (and in fact is just flat out wrong).radek (talk) 16:33, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  necessary vs. sufficient conditions 

message: Re: "Aggregating individual consumer demand curves presents several problems"
Good as it is, this argument could be made even stronger.  The participants in an economic system are not independent.  They are interdependent as a direct consequence of the division of labor. See the article on economic interdependence.Temple Bayliss (talk) 15:26, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Aggregating individual consumer demand curves presents several problems
Talk:Interior gateway protocol

message: The second line of the summary states:
"In contrast an exterior gateway protocol is for determining network reachability between autonomous systems (AS) and makes use of IGPs to resolve route within an AS."  However, the first line does not define the use of IGP.  If "the use of IGPs is to resolve routes within an autonomous system" then the article should say so explicitly in the first line or paragraph fo the summary. 
Also, may we please have an example of its use and purpose? Stephen Charles Thompson (talk)
 == Wrong link ==
The link near the beginning to exterior gateway protocol is not really correct as in the text it's a reference to the general class of exterior gateway protocols and there is no such page yet. Instead it points to the page for the specific protocol Exterior Gateway Protocol. Unfortunately the class of protocols and the specific protocol have the same name. -- Dougher (talk) 22:08, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Unclear

message: The article does not explain the name. I remember when having my first contact with IGPs, I always wondered, why they are called "gateway" protocols and not routing protocols. Then I realized that their purpose is finding the most suitable gateway router that can deliver the packet to its destination.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:C2:43F6:D400:4938:BCD9:113E:29D2 (talk) 19:19, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explaining Naming 

message: A longstanding suggestion at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Computing/Computer_networking_task_force#Tasks suggested there was misplaced material in this article. I have moved this to Distance-vector routing protocol and Link-state routing protocol. Now this article is similar in scope to Exterior gateway protocol. It is possible both can be merged into Routing protocol but I don't see any urgency to this. ~Kvng (talk) 21:08, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: There really should be a single place that explains the EGP–IGP split, including the history (which none of these articles treat well), which is necessary for understanding why the split still exists. (Especially given the existence of data center networks that "route" Ethernet frames using BGP!) 207.180.169.36 (talk) 01:33, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Distance-vector routing protocol]] and [[Link-state routing protocol]]