Talk:Gogok

message: I edited this page to make it more comprehensive and informative.  Tortfeasor 05:20, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! -- Visviva 02:04, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Shouldn't we be providing titles that conform to the July 2000 romanization scheme? The title here seems to be a play on Mc-R. Isn't it "Gokok" according to the July 2000 scheme? Additionally, according to this romanized title "Kokkok", the Korean should be 곡곡 which is obviously not correct.
:i agree, somebody please move it to the properly romanized name. my guess would be gok-ok, but not 100% sure. Appleby 02:20, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Sounds good to me.  I admit I don't have the technical expertise for it.  To be honest, someone in magatama made this page because they were made about some of the edits there.  Tortfeasor 23:25, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

text: I think that it would be gogok under RR.  I think that the middle consonant is usually tensed -- although none of the dictionaries at hand can confirm this -- but that kind of sound change is recognized only in MR, not in RR.  Hence gogok in RR, and possibly kokok in MR.  Mercifully, RR is the one that's most important for us here.  Anyway, if someone with native-speaker intuition can clarify the pronunciation, that would be excellent. -- Visviva 02:02, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gokok? 

message: "However, most archaeologists conclude that this art form originated in Korea." Can anyone cite the sources of the statistics?  If there is no such things, the sentence should be deleted.--Hskf4 10:29, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: most archaeologists?

message: Japan is known for stealing ancient Korean artifacts since the Hideyoshi war on Korea to forced Japanese occupational period, as much as 200,000 artifacts were stolen from Korea and only few thousands were returned. Japanese have been busy fabricating their ancient past to claimed on Korea's ancient past. Without the proper bronze and confiscated tools you can not produce artifacts like Gog-ok (curved jade), also where are all these other jades from Japan, why only just Gog-ok? There is high possibility that Japanese have been stealing Korea's Gog-ok and claiming as theirs.
Japan claims Gog-ok was originated from Northern Japan during later stone age, that would be Ainu people. Today, no Ainu people in Japan are producing any Gog-ok jades or precious stone items. We all know about Ainu people in Japan, they weren't very developed people.--Korsentry 03:40, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Japanese claims are flimsy

message: Come to think of it, the ornaments for a horse in the Pazyryk felt look like gogoks. Komitsuki (talk) 14:41, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Connection with Pazyryk burial felt? 

message: Substituted at 16:27, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Gogok. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110612092144/http://www.fitzmuseum.cam.ac.uk/opac/catalogue_detail.php?&object_number=C.102-1984&_limit_=10&_function_=xslt to http://www.fitzmuseum.cam.ac.uk/opac/catalogue_detail.php?&object_number=C.102-1984&_limit_=10&_function_=xslt
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:45, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified