lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Chemical element

message: Could someone please remove some of the templates added in this diff , which seem to be questionably relevant to the article. Specifically please could the  be removed, as this article has little to do with the origin of life, Could the  be removed because I don't see how any of the links in it are relevant, and could the  template be removed because it duplicates the contents of the article and I don't see why sorting out diatomic elements is relevant here. Thank you. 192.76.8.91 (talk) 12:25, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: as the editor who added these templates, any thoughts? Bestagon ⬡ 03:02, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:   * Pppery * it has begun... 22:02, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 16 September 2023 

message: This sentence is confusing since it implies that atoms can have more than one atomic number.
FROM:
This is in contrast to chemical compounds and mixtures, which contain atoms with more than one atomic number.
TO: 
Ben said.This is in contrast to chemical compounds and mixtures,  which contain more than one type of atom with different atomic numbers. CrazyCat138 (talk) 02:41, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: – I've changed it to  because "more than one type" appears redundant to "different atomic numbers" in the proposed replacement. Tollens (talk) 04:28, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 12 December 2023 

message: Change
By 1914, eighty-seven elements were known, all naturally occurring.(See Timeline of chemical element discoveries) The remaining naturally occurring elements were discovered or isolated in subsequent decades, and various additional elements have also been produced synthetically, with much of that work pioneered by Glenn T. Seaborg.
to
By 1914, eighty-seven elements were known, all naturally occurring. (See Timeline of chemical element discoveries). The remaining naturally occurring elements were discovered or isolated in subsequent decades, and various additional elements have also been produced synthetically, with much of that work pioneered by Glenn T. Seaborg.
or
By 1914, eighty-seven elements were known, all naturally occurring (see Timeline of chemical element discoveries). The remaining naturally occurring elements were discovered or isolated in subsequent decades, and various additional elements have also been produced synthetically, with much of that work pioneered by Glenn T. Seaborg.
 Jiminy Cricket the Third (talk) 23:17, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: VQuakr (talk) 23:29, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 7 February 2024 

message: Isotopes are mentioned in multiple sections but there is nothing about them in the lead. I think that should be rectified. Praemonitus (talk) 05:10, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Isotopes 

message: Rewrite needed of the Boyle section; it's like 75% blockquotes. Quotes should be limited in their usage, as discussed at MOS:QUOTATIONS. VQuakr (talk) 18:44, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boyle section rewrite
Talk:Copenhagen interpretation

message: The miscellaneous quotations added in this edit do not, in my view, contribute clarity to the article. We already summarize the serious scholarship by Howard and others that indicates how ahistorical invocations of "the" Copenhagen interpretation are. Questioning the unity of "the" Copenhagen interpretation is at least as old as Jammer's book in 1974, or in other words, only about twenty years younger than the use of "Copenhagen interpretation" in print. The lengthy quotation from Beller is orthogonal to the question of how the term originated, and the others are repetitive, seemingly chosen at random, and do not convey additional information. (An offhand mention in a book about falling cats? It's a fine book — I've read it — but really?) The lengthy quotation from Stone is mostly tangential as well, and pushes a POV that plenty of physicists have disagreed with, from Heisenberg on; I mean, how easy is it to visualize a wave function for more than one particle? For a finite-dimensional Hilbert space bigger than a single qubit? And while the term "wave mechanics" might be mostly used these days to talk about the history of quantum physics, it didn't vanish entirely; it's still in use, being roughly synonymous with "Schrödinger picture". XOR'easter (talk) 20:15, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Text removed 

message: As the section on Origin points out, the "Copenhagen interpretation" is not a characterization espoused by any of the principals listed in the lead paragraph.  An encyclopedic approach to the topic should start with what "it" is and "it" is a name coined in the mid-1950s for ideas partly traceable to Bohr and Heisenberg, but also Born Dirac and von Neumann, and many others. In fact the breadth contributors to the "Copenhagen interpretation" is exactly why it is the most commonly taught. Johnjbarton (talk) 22:30, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I've tried adjusting the intro. Faye's article in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy lists Born right up there with Bohr and Heisenberg; Dirac and maybe Pauli could potentially be mentioned too. XOR'easter (talk) 22:32, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks  Johnjbarton (talk) 00:24, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead vs Body on the origin and meaning of topic. 

message: I renamed a section to The Heisenberg cut. This section is confusing. It mixes up quantum discontinuity, measurement, and quantum system definition, plus some goop about observers and cosmology, with a dollop of mind projection fallacy. Johnjbarton (talk) 00:27, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: We can probably tidy it up and maybe move some stuff around, but I'm not sure what's intrinsically confusing about it. There's a cluster of related complaints about the Copenhagen interpretation(s), sometimes phrased as having to make a division between quantum and classical, or between microscopic and macroscopic, reversible and irreversible, etc. Quantum cosmology is then claimed to be a setting where the Copenhagen interpretation(s) can't work, because there is no "outside". XOR'easter (talk) 00:40, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Heisenberg cut
Talk:Charybdis

message: It is possible that Charybdis was the mutation of Chalybians or Chalybes (a people lived at coast of northern Asia Minor, compare Halybe of Homer)).
Scylla was the mutation of Scolotians or Scoloti (a Schythian people lived at European-Thracian coast of Black Sea).
Both were the terror of sailors who have been travelled across Bosporus, in during of 2nd/1st millennium B.C.
--IonnKorr 15:25, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Charybdis]] and [[Chalybes]] 

message: Is it worth mentioning that the Charybdis is one of the major trials faced by Odysseus? —Ilyanep (Talk) 01:15, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: At this time, the article text does refer to Charybdis as a "trial of Odysseus" -- paragraph beginning "Stranded on a makeshift raft, ..." (there's much more that's been included).  So it's been taken care of.  Dave Fafarman (talk) 18:18, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Odyssey 

message: "In Greek mythology, Charybdis or Kharybdis ("sucker down", Greek — Χάρυβδις) was a sea monster, daughter of Poseidon and Gaia." and "Charybdis was originally a sea-nymph who flooded land to enlarge her father's underwater kingdom, until Zeus turned her into a monster."  Is a daughter of Gaia and Poseidon a sea-nymph?--Randalllin 07:03, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction 

message: Anyone know how Charybdis is usually pronounced by anglophones? --Surturz 04:23, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: According to Gods, Demigods & Demons: An Encyclopedia of Greek Mythology by Bernard Evslin, "kuh RIB dihss". --OGoncho 23:34, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciation

message: Why was "Homer's Odyssey: The Voyage Home" deleted from this article?  This was a radio drama version of the epic poem by Homer which prominently featured the monster Charybdis.  This article includes many instances in which Charybdis is referenced in popular culture, including video games, films, books and popular music.  This was a radio drama retelling of the Charybdis story from Homeric myth, as heard on XM Satellite Radio -- how was it irrelevant to the subject matter?  Soundout (talk) 00:57, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion of Homer's Odyssey: The Voyage Home
Talk:Cardinal

message: I am deleting or reverting any contributions I have previously made to this article for the following reason.  I work for a company that practices and teaches Strategic Planning methodologies thus making my contribution to any article related to Strategy topics a conflict of interest an in violation of Wikipedia Conflict of Interest guidelines WP:COI --Mike Cline 13:25, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Deleting Mike Cline Contributions

message: Anon. IP removed a link with no explanation.  I reverted. -- SECisek 01:25, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Revert

message: Cardinal → Cardinal (disambiguation) — We should really give the main article to what is now Cardinal (Catholicism).  A look at "what links here" shows this is overwhemingly the main use involved. The mathmatical use is at Cardinal number, & if there were a predominant sports team using the term they could have "Cardinals" (I don't have a view on that).  Few people can really link to "Cardinal" when they mean "cardinal bird", and the other uses are minor.  This page should herefore become "Cardinal (disambiguation)" —Johnbod 20:05, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A move proposal for this page was listed at Wikipedia:Requested moves, but there was no consensus found for the move. Dekimasuよ! 00:34, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: The passenger train entry reads “Cardinal (passenger train), an Amtrak route connecting Chicago with New York via Cincinnati and Washington” -- it mentions Cincinnati and Washington to avoid confusion with Amtrak’s other Chicago-New York routes:
* Lake Shore Limited (18h 45m)
* Pennsylvanian and Capitol Limited (19h)
* Regional Service and Capitol Limited (21h)
For reference purposes, note that the Cardinal service is 28h 50m.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.205.54.39 (talk) 13:15, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Passenger Train Entry 
Talk:Carl Menger

message: I.e. at www.mises.org - I think those links could be added.
This URL (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Menger) redirects to this one(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Menger_Hotel). I doubt the Menger Hotel is more relevant than Carl Menger. At least there should be a link to a desambiguation page, I think.
I tried to add a link to a study guide to Menger's principles of economics, but it has been deleted.My question : WHY ? There are no copyrights prob, since I hold them. And the site is mises.org.
If anyone wants to add it, here's the link : http://www.mises.org/books/mengerprinciples-studyguide.pdf, by Jérémie T.A. Rostan.Rostan (talk) 16:26, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Works can be downloaded 

message: The link http://mason.gmu.edu/~tlidderd/menger/ to the abridged "Principles of Economics" is no longer working as of this edit. If it remains dead for a while, it should be removed. Jlick (talk) 08:01, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead Link 

message: This article has Menger's birthday as February 28. The online Britannica (at least) has it at February 23. Can someone find an authoritative reference? I just want to know if I celebrated prematurely. :) SkyDot (talk) 03:35, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthday 

message: That would be useful.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.11.75.129 (talk) 22:14, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Any important mainstream criticisms?
Talk:Country code

message: I propose we create two separate pages, one for ISO 3166, and one for Internet ccTLDs, since some Internet ccTLDs are not ISO 3166 codes, and most ISO 3166 codes are not Internet ccTLDs. Then we can have a page country codes, which points to various different types of country codes -- Internet ccTLDs, ISO 3166 codes, FIPS codes, E.164 codes, etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SJK (talk • contribs) 07:03, 20 December 2001 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate code types 

message: Dear Zundark, Hu12, Tangerines, and others who have corrected my editing -
I am fairly new to Wikipedia, so please pardon any newbie errors. After your corrections, I read up on the rules regarding external links. So here is the situation: CommonDataHub is a relatively new service that makes available various code sets, one of which is country codes (other subject areas are coming up). It strives to provide information and mapping that is not available elsewhere, and people have found it quite useful. (If it matters - much of the information there is available free without any registration, some of it requires a paid subscription.) Unfortunately, since I am affiliated with it, according to the rules I cannot add that link here. If any of you are subject matter experts in this area, kindly review www.commondatahub.com, and if you feel it is relevant and useful to the public, please add it as an external link. Thank you, Sincerely, Mkwk567 (talk) 17:34, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consolidated list of various country code schemes and mapping among them 
Talk:Timeline of computing

message: I think YouTube and its contemporaries revolutionized the interaction with Internet which people new use as a gigantic digital video recorder leaving aside telvision.  DynV (talk) 01:35, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: --greenrd (talk) 16:23, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Application Area 

message: I may be overlooking something, but how was the image and imagemap produced?
Any links for recreating so I can add the updates mentioned above and some more of my own?
(I want to add a link to the Go programming language in 2007, but once I start I'm sure there will be many other updates).
Is there a general HOWTO wikipedia doc, if not, I shall create one.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ganly (talk • contribs) 21:17, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The actual image is generated by Template:Timeline History of Computing. That page uses a very obscure undocumented language, which is used almost nowhere else on Wikipedia! If you need any help, just @ mention me or write a message on my talk page.--greenrd (talk) 15:18, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  How is/was this image produced 

message: The graphical timeline is now missing. Was this purposefully removed? 38.108.59.142 (talk) 15:21, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Graphic Missing
Talk:Lists of universities and colleges

message: I had thought of editing some pages related to French universities and institutions, and I feel that some coherence should first be given to the choice of name to be used for each of these. See a bit above a similar remark (dated July 2002) about Catalan universities.
Reading Wikipedia:Naming_conventions_%28use_English%29 and its discussion page (notably the paragraph about parliaments or political parties) I am rather more puzzled than I could be before.
If I browse through various pro country university lists, I can only discover that there has been no common policy as what to do with university names, e.g.
* for Germany or Italy, the English name is systematically used, with a redirection from the local name ;
* for Belgium, the English name redirects to the local name, as well in French speaking or Dutch speaking Belgium ;
* in French speaking Canada, there are entries for University of Montreal and for Laval University, but on the other hand for Université de Sherbrooke and Université du Québec ;
* in France, the Grandes Écoles like École Polytechnique seem systematically described under their French name, while universities proper seem to be ordered under their English name (e.g. University of Poitiers) (very few are already in the Wikipedia).
The page List_of_colleges_and_universities_starting_with_U is a special mess, with its mix of translated names (e.g. "university of Modena") and native names (e.g. "universita degli Studi di Pavia").
I think that some more precise instructions should be precious to future editors.
--French Tourist 21:46, 30 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  English names or local names for universities ? 

message: Would anyone be interested in helping to complile a list of Art Colleges?  There appears to be none as yet, and I believe it would be most usefull.
Cageybee 19:26, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Art colleges
Talk:Computer-generated music

message: I wonder who continuosly deletes Synethesia from here. The software creates whole composition from pictures in a few seconds.
MAX/MPX doesn't belong here. It is just a tool for composers! -—The preceding unsigned comment was added by LauriGrohn (talk • contribs) 07:48, 28 October 2006  (UTC)
:Don't add links to your own website. See WP:EL#Links normally to be avoided. If you think it's worth mentioning, put it here on the talk page and see if the rest of us think it's worth putting on the page. As for MAX/MSP, it's a very, very widely used tool in computer music (maybe even the most widely used software in this field). There is really no grounds for ommitting it. Also, please sign your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your talk page posts, which will automatically be converted into your name and date the entry. - Rainwarrior 17:11, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Lauri Gröhn

message: Could someone who knows about these things have a glance at Talk:Bob Fink#Computer generated music? Someone there is arguing the toss about what seems to me an indefensible claim (even with qualifications about the defintion) that one Bob Fink "was among the first to write a computer program that could compose melodies by itself" - in 1995! Tearlach 03:10, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Bob Fink
Talk:Centimetre–gram–second system of units

message: Gavo atoms (talk) 07:08, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: As others have noted, the talk page is for discussing the article, or improvements to the article. If there is an EMFD unit that should be included, then we can discuss that.  (As far as I know, there is no such unit, at least in the CGS contexts.)  I try to be a little flexible, and give people the benefit of the doubt, that the question might have some use for improving the article. But deleting this posts doesn't even allow discussion of the relevance to the article.  (Though I agree, that I suspect that there isn't any.) Gah4 (talk) 01:44, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  What is an EMFD unit? Dondervogel 2 (talk) 09:29, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  emfd 

message: The article mentions vacuum permittivity as part of the SI definition of Ampere, but I think it should be Vacuum_permeability.  Now, since there is a connection between the two, maybe it isn't so obvious. Gah4 (talk) 04:53, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I've changed the link.  —Quondum 11:56, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Vacuum_permeability]]
Talk:Classical liberalism

message: Is there really a source that describes Murray N. Rothbard as a classical liberal? 93.45.229.98 (talk) 06:40, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Who else is he? --95.24.66.215 (talk) 03:45, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rothbard? 

message: What is the difference between CL and right-libertarianism? --95.24.66.215 (talk) 03:45, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Right-libertarianism]]
Talk:Coca-Cola

message: This is my first time submitting a request but it is a pretty small thing, i wanted to change this "Coca-Cola Starlight (2022-present) to Coca-Cola Starlight (2022-2022) because it has been discontinued on August 2022. Sorry in advance, but just wanted to help a little. JPhaseV (talk) 00:41, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Lightoil (talk) 03:39, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 7 February 2023 

message: The redirect Ke Kou Ke Le has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  estar8806 (talk) ★ 23:31, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Ke Kou Ke Le]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: — Assignment last updated by Wikiallshi (talk) 23:07, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Writing Workshop
Talk:Conservatism

message: As I mentioned above, instead of basing the definition of the topic on writings by individuals who self-identify as conservatives or of non-conservatives presenting their personal interpretations, we should per Wikipedia:TERTIARY first determine which definitions are most common and present them according to acceptance in the literature.
One good source is Mark Garnett's article "Conservatism" in the political science textbook Ideology (OUP 2017). Dr. Garnett explains how many self-described conservatives are writing about forms of right-wing liberalism or populism. I don't think the focus of the article should be on views that have little academic acceptance.
If you have other tertiary sources, I would appreciate them. TFD (talk) 13:05, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello. Now there are three tertiary sources in the lede—Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Encyclopædia Britannica and Andrew Heywood's Political Theory: An Introduction (2004)—with quotations incorporated in the references that support the current definition. Heywood is the leading writer of politics textbooks in the UK, and his works are referenced throughout the article. Trakking (talk) 16:07, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tertiary sources 

message: I just noticed that Trakking also deleted my Confucius quote. Is Confucius "extremely obscure and not authoritative"?Rick Norwood (talk) 02:23, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Confucius holds great authority, but he lived 2000+ years prior to the invention of the ideology of conservatism in the late 18th century. However, as the grandfather of Chinese conservative thought he could be mentioned in a new section about China under ”National variants”. Conservatism in China is strongly associated with Confucianism. Trakking (talk) 10:27, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

text: Thank you, The Four Deuces, for correcting my mistake. I did not know that rule. Rick Norwood (talk) 00:38, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edit
Talk:Computer-generated art

message: The following articles overlap:
*Computer art
*Computer-generated art
*Digital art
I realize that "digital art" and "computer art" have technically different meanings, but in practice they almost always refer to the same thing, and they're resulting in similar articles. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. They need to be merged into one article, either digital art or computer art or similar.Computer-generated art can be confusing.
Note the existence of these more specific articles:
*Generative art
*Computer graphics
*Digital painting
*3D computer graphics
*2D computer graphics
FAL 08:40, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Overlapping articles