Talk:Social network aggregation

message: Social Network Aggregation is a new trend in the Social Network Services Space. In Oct 2007 Social Thing got funded for $ 300 K as noted by Mashable. There are over 25 startups working in this area such as Spokeo, 8Hands, Profilefly. What is "not notable" about it? Is it the new author who is not notable because s/he is not "well known" in the existing network or a personal bias? Please give clear hard data to defend your point or suggest changes that will help the article remain. Thanks
:Please follow the guidelines in building a WikiPedia article. Igor Berger (talk) 08:12, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Take a look at this Wikipedia:Article Igor Berger (talk) 08:14, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

text: I agree with Igor here - I had prodded it for similar reasons and the article really doesn't make any sense. It's a mix between a NN Neogolism, a company advertisement and external link article. I support deletion. Cheers, Spawn Man (talk) 08:21, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

text: Igor I have used your suggestion and the article is now at User:Ujwaltickoo/Social Network Aggregation I hope that other contributors will help edit and improve the article. As far as Spawn Man's opinions about the article "not making sense" -- its his personal perspective. To the criticism that it is a company advertisement -- I have used text from my own blog -- giving Wikipedia the rights over the text I typed. If some other user can bring the same set of ideas from other source -- good! I am not interested in a pesonal ad or fight with a person but contributing an article which is important and I have given supporting data. Thanks  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ujwaltickoo (talk • contribs) 09:11, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Do not worry, he did not mean it. That is how things marked here. And I kknow what you are talking about because I hang out with Andy Beard. Just work on the article and it should be okay. Igor Berger (talk) 09:34, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Lol, at least we know it's from a blog - I'll sleep easy tonight... ;) I was saying it didn't make sense to me and yes, it does sound like and advertisement with the "Why Social Network Aggregation?" shtick. As you said, my opinions are my own... No intention meant to be insulting - sorry if I came across that way. Cheers, Spawn Man (talk) 22:48, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks much better, guess a few people came around to fix it. Take a look what Andy Beard and IZEA have to say about this! And do not forget the aggregators like Bloglines.com, Mybloglog.com, and Technorati.com and a few others. This could be built into a real article. Igor Berger (talk) 23:20, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: Are there any reliable sources that can verify this is a notable phenomenon or business sector. Otherwise, this just seems like an essay describing some random phenomenon, that some people woudl like to aggregate their social networks. 128.36.147.198 (talk) 14:42, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That's why it's up for deletion. Equazcion •✗/C • 19:30, 9 Apr 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: *It's very real.  I will find the reliable source and incorporate them. kgrr talk 19:26, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: ORIGINAL RESEARCH

message: I've moved the section below from the article in case anyone wants to rewrite it. --Pixelface (talk) 16:05, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks good, that section is a bit problematic and needs careful rewrite not to have it WP:OR and WP:SYN Igor Berger (talk) 20:24, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: the whole thing has a lot of OR and SYN issues.  especially the blogs used as sources.  If they are removed what is left?  --Rocksanddirt (talk) 23:29, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

text: And the information is despersed on different networks so we need to integrate it, by using ICQ etc., Igor Berger (talk) 23:40, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved from the article

message: Have read at this and see what can be brought to this article. This is from Barry Wellman's article's page. What he is saying are the reasons for social network agregation. It is like the same reason that we are editors on Wikipedia. The need to socialize and share knowledge with others. Igor Berger (talk) 23:38, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: And the information is despersed on different networks so we need to integrate it, by using ICQ etc., Igor Berger (talk) 23:40, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Work Networks and ICTs

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Social network aggregation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120622083248/http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/who_uses_social_networks_and_what_are_they_like_part_1.php to http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/who_uses_social_networks_and_what_are_they_like_part_1.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:28, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018) 

message: I've added a "Copy edit" template to the first paragraph in the Social network aggregators section. That first sentence isn't right, because the listed platforms (Twitter, etc) aren't social network activities. But I'm not familiar enough with the subject matter to fix it.
Also, the phrase "trying to keep an eye on one's interests" doesn't sound right, stylistically. -- Doktor Züm (talk) 02:13, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The idiom that you reference could be eliminated for those aren't native readers. You could modify the paragraph to, "Social network aggregation platforms allow members to share social network posts from examples like Twitter, YouTube, Stumbleupon, Digg, or Delicious, with other major platforms. Content appears in real time to other members who subscribe to a particular community, eliminating the need to move from one social media network to another." Inomyabcs (talk) 20:31, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paragraph needs editing