lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hong Kong Sheng Kung Hui

message: A proposal is being floated at the project page that there be a  standard format for organising each article about national provinces of the Anglican Communion, including this one. Please consider participating in the straw vote and discussion. Cheers! Fishhead64 21:43, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Uniform format proposal

message: Normally organizations with non-English names have translated names as their page title, and then the native name in parenthesis in the lead. I would do that here, except that in this case I have basically never heard it called anything other than 'Hong Kong Sheng Kung Hui', even in strictly English contexts. Thoughts?  Tb (talk) 22:01, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Page name

message: An IP editor has twice removed the disambiguation for SKH without explanation.  Is there something I'm missing?  Tb (talk) 18:03, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation 

message: Apart from the Traditional Anglican Communion, the article should really consider verifying whether groups within the Hong Kong Sheng Kung Hui have ever sought a similar canonical structure to the proposed personal ordinariates. ADM (talk) 18:08, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Talk:Personal Ordinariate

message: wording and general tone seems contrary to NPOV
examples:
"also actively develops education and social service to bring harmony, peace and joy to the Hong Kong community."
"Despite contributing a great deal in the field of education"
Kiki0021 (talk) 08:00, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Resolved. STSC (talk) 15:01, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV
Talk:Episcopal Church in Jerusalem and the Middle East

message: A proposal is being floated at the project page that there be a  standard format for organising each article about national provinces of the Anglican Communion, including this one. Please consider participating in the straw vote and discussion. Cheers! Fishhead64 21:43, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Uniform format proposal

message: Apart from the Traditional Anglican Communion, the article should really consider verifying whether groups within the Episcopal Church in Jerusalem and the Middle East have ever sought a similar canonical structure to the proposed personal ordinariates. ADM (talk) 18:08, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Talk:Personal Ordinariate
Talk:Anglican Church of Mexico

message: A proposal is being floated at the project page that there be a  standard format for organising each article about national provinces of the Anglican Communion, including this one. Please consider participating in the straw vote and discussion. Cheers! Fishhead64 21:44, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Uniform format proposal

message: Apart from the Traditional Anglican Communion, the article should really consider verifying whether groups within the Anglican Church of Mexico have ever sought a similar canonical structure to the proposed personal ordinariates. ADM (talk) 18:08, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Talk:Personal Ordinariate
Talk:Church of Nigeria

message: A proposal is being floated at the project page that there be a  standard format for organising each article about national provinces of the Anglican Communion, including this one. Please consider participating in the straw vote and discussion. Cheers! Fishhead64 21:44, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Uniform format proposal

message: how Christianity came in to Nigeria 105.112.55.111 (talk) 15:45, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Christianity
Talk:Church of Pakistan

message: A proposal is being floated at the project page that there be a  standard format for organising each article about national provinces of the Anglican Communion, including this one. Please consider participating in the straw vote and discussion. Cheers! Fishhead64 21:44, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Uniform format proposal

message: Apart from the Traditional Anglican Communion, the article should really consider verifying whether groups within the Church of Pakistan have ever sought a similar canonical structure to the proposed personal ordinariates. ADM (talk) 18:08, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Talk:Personal Ordinariate
Talk:Spanish Reformed Episcopal Church

message: A proposal is being floated at the project page that there be a  standard format for organising each article about national provinces of the Anglican Communion, including this one. Please consider participating in the straw vote and discussion. Cheers! Fishhead64 21:45, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Uniform format proposal

message: Apart from the Traditional Anglican Communion, the article should really consider verifying whether groups within the Spanish Reformed Episcopal Church have ever sought a similar canonical structure to the proposed personal ordinariates. ADM (talk) 18:08, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Talk:Personal Ordinariate

message: I have added about six inline references for the article. For the length of the entry I think it certainly has enough citations that the warning for insufficient inline sources should be removed. Xphilosopherking (talk) 09:24, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of Warning
Talk:Church of the Province of West Africa

message: A proposal is being floated at the project page that there be a  standard format for organising each article about national provinces of the Anglican Communion, including this one. Please consider participating in the straw vote and discussion. Cheers! Fishhead64 21:46, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Uniform format proposal
Talk:Province of Canterbury

message: Why is this the Province of Canterbury, rather than the Province of London?  London seems to have had a larger population for a long time and is of course the capital. -- Beland (talk) 01:05, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It's the Province of Canterbury because it is headed by the Archbishop of Canterbury. Norvo (talk) 14:37, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canterbury vs. London
Talk:Society of Catholic Priests

message: This article should be titled Society of Anglo-Catholic Priests as long as the term Catholic is too ambiguous for the Catholic Church to have an article with her proper name. It is all the more ambiguous to have have it as the name of a society of non-Catholics.  Besides, there is perfectly good name which Anglicans use readily: Anglo-Catholic.  As long as the actual name of an entity doesn't really matter on WP, perhaps we can come up with several other titles for this group.  I am willing to be creative and come up with one.  In fact maybe I should dominate all discussion on this page for the next 6 months... or years.   --Vaquero100 04:25, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You're not enjoying our conversation? :) Fishhead64 05:55, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Diocese of Nova Scotia and Prince Edward Island

message: Has the diocese always included PEI, even though it was not reflected in the original name? – Kaihsu (talk) 10:37, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not as sharp on Canadian dioceses as English, but off the top of my head... yes? DBD 13:25, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

text: "Diocese of Nova Scotia created (included present-day Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Quebec, Prince Edward Island, Newfoundland) " Diocesan site – History. There we go. That wasn't so hard. DBD 13:28, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prince Edward Island 
Talk:Flag of Martinique

message: Is this flag still used?  JerryFriedman 23:17, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :File:Emblem of Martinique.svg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a non-free use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
-- Marchjuly (talk) 05:29, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for File:Emblem of Martinique.svg

message: The text describes an orange stripe, the image has a green stripe. Are there different versions? Galund (talk) 22:11, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  orange or green?
Talk:Saunders-Roe

message: "In the same year Saro's helicopter and hovercraft interests were taken over by Westland" - did Saro have anything else ? Did Westland acquire the whole company, or just the businesses ?  -- Beardo 23:20, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Westland

message: Not sure if this is useful or not but I am pasting this comment here that was added to the article, To the best of my knowledge most if not all the 624 Leyland Royal Tigers for Autobuses Modernos SA of Havana were shipped as complete vehicles.
It was not signed originally. Happy New Year Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 18:07, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved editor's comment

message: Wondering if anyone knows anything on Saro-Gill, or Saro/Gill designed marine propulsion units around ? 
Recorded in Stout Sturdy and Strong, The Alvis Stalwart Story by John Rue
This is 1961
Presumably, this is the same Saro marine boat builders. Darzet boy (talk) 03:08, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Saro-Gill marine propulsion
Talk:Toy Soldiers (song)

message: The second paragraph here says only Martika sang, then says there was a choir and identifies those who were members of it. Which statement is correct? -- Mikeblas 23:22, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  choir or not? 

message: This entry fails to mention who wrote the song!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.78.163.48 (talk) 14:22, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Writer? 

message: This article is automatically assessed as a stub article when it's far from a stub.Ajsmith141 (talk) 20:34, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Auto assess 
Talk:Gender-bait

message: contrary to a popular idea the practice should be more prevalent in avoiding harassment from certain males Didn't quite understand the meaning. Is there a typo in it? Biblbroks 23:25, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I got the jist of it, but thought it was still poorly-worded, so in my edit I also changed that wording even though my main concern in editing it was to categorize the poor thing. How is it now? Runa27 21:09, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: older discussion

message: on 4chan, a trap is also someone who has had a sex change, but has not "gone all the way", if you know what i mean.
Common: male to female  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sghfdhdfghdfgfd (talk • contribs) 13:14, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trap (internet)
Talk:Warden of the Mint

message: I intended to qualify "Royal Mint" when I started the article, but somehow, I wasn't too happy with any of the alternatives.  So I decided to let it dangle for a while, even if it seemed a bit ethnocentric.
For one thing, most of the source material I had managed to dig up on this particular office had to do with Newton's appointments in 1696 and 1699.  Obviously, the "United Kingdom" did not even exist as a polity until the Act of Union 1800.  Nor yet even "Great Britain", which came of the Acts of Union 1707 and created (among other things) a currency union with Scotland and the Pound Scots.
Well, since the Royal Mint had its roots in Wessex with Alfred the Great, I suppose I could have called it the "English Royal Mint", but I didn't think that would fly.  And I don't know exactly when the office of "Warden" was created.  Probably with Henry III.
I am not sure of the date when "Master of the Mint" was confused "Warden of the Mint"—at first unofficially, then offically.  I surmise that this would not have happened during Newton's lifetime, but....  Both titles seem to have been abolished in 1870, although I don't have a good source.  
However, if the title of "Warden" became defunct before the Act of Union of 1800, there would never have been a "Warden of the Royal Mint of the United Kingdom", would there?  Perhaps of Great Britain?  Or of Britain?--Ziusudra 23:26, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry for the historically inaccurate edit (I wasn't sure if and when you might return to tidy up).  I'm not an expert in British history by any means; it just wasn't apparent to me at first which goverment or country this position performed its duties for. I have changed to "Great Britain" to fix my error, but absolutely feel free to edit my humble contributions or any others at any time if it improves the information. Satori Son 01:00, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No prob.  Thanks for pitching in!  --Ziusudra 01:31, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Warden of the Royal Mint "of Great Britain" 

message: This article says "Master of the mint" was subordinate to "Warden of the mint". This is probably false: This book says "In December 1699, Thomas Neale died and Newton at long last achieved the promotion he had desired for so long. He became Master of the Mint." (And the Master of the Mint article corroborates this timeline.) To be fixed? Shreevatsa (talk) 22:27, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subordinate?
Talk:List of Highlander: The Raven episodes

message: I've applied the same structure of List of Highlander episodes. Therefore I've also created the page Episodes of Highlander: The Raven. Secretaria 11:43, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article contradicts the Highlander: The Raven main article according to the date(s) of the series' original run: This article says that the first episode aired on September 21 while the main article says it was September 26. So what is in fact right?--BECK's 20:55, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction to [[Highlander: The Raven]] main article 

message: Despite its status as a WP:FL (though its promotion was all the way back to 2007, when Wikipedia's MOS was much less established), single-season TV series almost never justify separate standalone List of episodes articles (basically, as per MOS:TVSPLIT), and the contents of this article should be merged back to Highlander: The Raven.
So posting this to gauge support for a merge – if there is no opposition proffered, I will merge the contents of this article back to the main series article in the future. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 20:07, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: looks like no objections. Klbrain (talk) 22:43, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  OK, will try to get to this, but not sure when that will happen. No objection if somebody else wants to handle the merge if I don't get to it first (they just need to follow WP:MERGETEXT). --IJBall (contribs • talk) 22:46, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

text: . However, all the links that aren't in the series navbox will need fixed. Wyliepedia @ 00:13, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  LoE should be merged back to ''[[Highlander: The Raven]]''
Talk:Crossed ladders problem

message: THIS AND THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE A DISCUSSION AND ARE **NOT** SUBMITTED UNDER THE GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE or GFDL. It is not documentation, but is comment.  PERMISSION IS GRANTED TO PUBLISH THE UNALTERED AND ATTRIBUTED COMMENTS OF THE AUTHORS IN FULL CONTEXT AND SEQUENCE, INCLUDING THIS LICENSE, AND TO APPEND ADDITIONAL COMMENTS SUBJECT TO THE SAME PROVISIONS OF THIS LICENSE. 
:Please note that at the time this comment was placed, every person who hit "save" saw the following notice: 
:::Content must not violate any copyright and must be verifiable. You agree to license your contributions under the GFDL.
:If the person who placed this disclaimer does not wish this material available under GFDL, he has the option to request removal from our designated agent. See Wikipedia:Copyrights. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 21:54, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Georg Neumann

message: The negative opinion concerning Neumann's present-day microphones is the kind of thing ("POV") which we generally strive to avoid on Wikipedia, no? -- DSatz 23:51, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with you.--Lenilucho 04:35, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. I got brave and rewrote the whole thing. Now it needs to be "mercilessly edited" by others. -- DSatz 16:44, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Hi, I may be mistaken in reverting your edit as I am not exactly an expert on this subject, but looking at the frequency response graphs for these microphones (at  and ) it seems to me that the U47 and U48 do emphasize the frequencies between 2-4 kHz (the frequencies the ear is most sensitive to) while the U67's frequency response is rather flat in this area. --KFP 16:27, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: KFP, you were not mistaken at all. -- To the anonymous person who posted the previous comment, the two engineers you mention came along decades after the U 47 was introduced. In Geoff Emerick's rather wonderful book it is quite evident that he and the Beatles were looking for all possible ways to (basically) push equipment past its normal bounds so as to produce sounds that their designers had never intended. Published materials from both Neumann and Gotham Audio (Neumann's very active U.S. representative) at the time of the U 67's introduction also refer to Neumann's tailoring the U 67's response specifically to allow for very close pickup of vocals without harshness; it is clear that this application had not been especially anticipated in the design of the U 47, which the U 67 was mainly designed to replace. DSatz 03:21, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:List of school districts in Missouri

message: I am currently working on completing this list using the dese.mo.gov list. I don't know which districts have wikipedia pages so i wont be adding them P.Shack 23:59, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Middle College Program

message: Why did someone say Laguardia is shutting down because of lice?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.76.8.210 (talk) 14:38, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
Talk:Tomás Gutiérrez Alea

message: Zleitzen, I would suggest that material be checked for potential copyright-vio.  It's a new user.  --TJive 00:11, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I am surprised to see in the opening credits of the 1976 Cuban film La última cena, the screen "Argumento y dirección T. G. ALEA". (The opening screen reads "El Instituto Cubano del Arte e Industria Cinemagráficos presenta" ...). Would this indicate that Gutiérrez Alea - or perhaps the Cuban Institute - considers Alea to be his "last", or proper surname, rather than Gutiérrez? Could this be a Revolutionary custom specific to Cuba? Milkunderwood (talk) 06:24, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Form of name 
Talk:Bullseye

message: Not in archery hardly refers to the bull's eye! 10 points is the inner Gold/not Silver. GhostInTheMachine 00:16, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Archery

message: I'm correcting links that point to the target disambiguation page, and some of the articles seem to be referencing the "bullseye" symbol (use on aircraft, as logo, etc) rather than any specific target article. Is the bullseye symbol worthy of its own page for these to link to? Garrepi 17:19, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Bullseye (symbol)

message: It seems to me that there is sufficient overlap to justify the two pages being merged.  In several cases, the two are merely different spellings of the same thing.99.245.248.91 (talk) 21:08, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge Bull's eye and Bullseye disambig pages?
Talk:Sunshine Project

message: The this article contained material copied verbatim from the Sunshine Project website. It has been removed pending verification of permission to copy. See Wikipedia:Copyright violations for more information.  --Blainster 00:25, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible copyright violation

message: Does anyone know what happened to cause this group to stop its work, if that is indeed what has happened? Calicocat (talk) 05:37, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What happened to them? 

message: It would appear that (by the articles own admission) the SP is not currently active.  Shouldn't this entire article be in past tense?67.163.212.52 (talk) 01:51, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tense?
Talk:Cedar Crest College

message: The list of buildings takes up a lot of space, but none of it is referenced and it is unclear whether these buildings have and historical or cultural significance. Simply listing names upon names of buildings is inappropriate for an encyclopedia. I propose deleting these sections if nothing changes. Melchior2006 (talk) 19:56, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Since nobody chimed in, I will streamline this section. --Melchior2006 (talk) 20:31, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Campus buildings
Talk:Pedotransfer function

message: A discrepancy within WP needs to be cleared up and, ideally, verification cited:
*From  Lyman James Briggs: "In 1906 he devised a soil classification technique called the moisture equivalent based on centrifuging, which is now thought of as the first pedotransfer function."
*From the article: "The first PTF came from the study of Lyman Briggs and McLane (1907). They determined the wilting coefficient,..."  -- Paleorthid 02:46, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The first pedotransfer function

message: Hi, this article, since the first edits by User:Terrarosa, has content identical to . This is plagiarism, which is intolerable. Certainly, some of these sections should be rewritten, as this article is violating fair use laws.+mwtoews 21:39, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagiarism 