lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Margarita

message: The IBA version lists Cointreau, not Triple Sec, so should that be what it says in the lead sentence? Dlabtot (talk) 05:59, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Cointreau is a brand of triple sec, and not everyone uses that brand. Kendall-K1 (talk) 16:21, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  Actually no, it is not a brand of triple sec.  https://www.barnonedrinks.com/tips/dictionary/c/cointreau-343.html Dlabtot (talk) 21:56, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cointreau vs Triple Sec in lead 

message: This story should be removed. The only source for this is a press release from Controy. The German ambassador to Mexico was Heinrich Rudt, not "Henkel," as German Wikipedia makes plain. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liste_der_deutschen_Botschafter_in_Mexiko  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.37.78.193 (talk) 17:36, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Controy origin story 

message: The discussion of glassware in this article lacks citations and feels like OR. It also seems slanted toward how the drink is consumed in the US.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Reskusic (talk • contribs) 23:59, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Glassware 

message: MOS:UNITNAMES calls for a non-breaking space between a number and a unit symbol. See the table "General guidelines on use of units", row "Numeric values": "Use a non-breaking space ... between a number and a unit symbol". GA-RT-22 (talk) 04:19, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non breaking spaces 

message: This section is skewed toward American popularity, despite the lead claiming that it is the world's most popular cocktails. Consider adding popularity in other countries, especially Central and South America where tequila and margaritas are popular.  EF1007 (talk) 21:52, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Popularity 

message: I've heard many times that either a damiana-infused tequila or a damiana liquor had been used frequently in very early margarita recipes. Can someone familiar with this with any reliable sources on this topic add some expansion/explanation to the article? — al-Shimoni (talk) 05:35, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Damiana
Talk:Azahari Husin

message: I don't see any sources in the linking of Azahari to all the important Indonesian bombings. It says there were traces fo explosives found at the home they were suspected of staying that linked them to the Mariott bommbing. Why aren't the explosives named? All of the bombings named -  the Mariott Bali 2002 The Embassy The latest Bali all used different explosives in kind and nature. I ti smy understanding that it is actually fairly tricky to create bombs - have them explode where yu want them and not blow yourself up in the process so many bombers and in fact whole organizations generally speciallize - The ETA The Irish Hamas etc
:What would be the point of naming the types of bombs there?  And there might have been many types.  x42bn6 Talk 08:26, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: this just goes to show that native pricks can be dangerous terrorists, even more dangerous than the commies Babyrina2 04:25, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  I Agree...
Talk:This Week in God

message: Is the "sacred chalice of holy water" quote actually in any of the videos on Comedy Central's site?  I only see "Now, with chalice holder!  I no longer have to search for my holy grail."  --Interiot 03:57, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: GodMachine2.0 quote

message: An article for a segment in a TV show? What in God's name is this doing in Wikipedia?
IMHO: This television-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by deleting it
71.141.124.124 17:21, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: *I did not compare TWiG to the White House. I used reductio ad absurdum to illustrate that saying that something is "just an X" is a very weak argument, because there are almost always exceptions to notions that a certain type of article subject matter isn't noteworthy, and because it's deceptive to try to recharacterize an article by ignoring all possible significance it would have and distilling it to just its type of subject, be it "just a building", "just a toy," "just a book" or "just a band." Whether something is noteworthy should be based on this specific instance, not on broad biases against a certain subject matter. -Silence 17:25, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Are you serious???=

message: I have a suspicion that Jon is making the beeping sounds off camera.  Can someone who has seen a taping confirm this?
:Aren't the beeping sounds exactly the same everytime, meaning that they're pre-recorded?  --bbatsell | « give me a ring » 23:09, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: And they're timed pretty well to match the video changes.  They've got to be pre-recorded. (though I think they may intentionally sound corny and human-generated).  --Interiot 14:25, 13 November 2005 (UTC)

text: It is Colbert.  During a Q&A before the Dec 8 taping of the Colbert Report, Colbert mentioned the "exclusive licensing" agreement but went on to say that he will always be the "ghost in the God machine," and obliged by performing a flawless "beebooboobeeboobooboobooboobeebooboobeeboobooboobooboobeebooboobeebooboobooboobee...booo...boop." NTK 19:19, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Beep...boop...boop
Talk:Macedonia (Slav)

message: This "Macedonia (Slav)" redirect is clearly wrong: it is redirecting to a sense of "Macedonian", whereas it should redirect to a sense of "Macedonia". I propose changing it to redirect to Republic of Macedonia (though the Socialist Republic of Macedonia was also Slavic, so redirecting to the disambiguation page Macedonia is another option). --Zundark (talk) 09:05, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect target
Talk:Tomás Hirsch

message: Why do you translate the name of the coalition in the piped link?  Why can't we just use the name of the coalition?  Tedernst | talk 18:00, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Because this is the English language Wikipedia. And because it's common practice to translate translatable names in encyclopedia articles. —Cantus…☎ 06:31, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tenth Doctor Adventures

message: What's the copyright situation on back-cover blurbs used in advertising/sales?  Can I copy the novel blurbs from Outpost Gallifrey, or would that be a copyright violation? —Josiah Rowe 04:35, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably best to just rephrase it - err on the side of caution. --khaosworks (talk • contribs) 06:39, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Summaries?

message: I'm proposing a merger with the Talk:Ninth Doctor Adventures -- see discussion page there. Bondegezou 12:13, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with [[Ninth Doctor Adventures]]

message: Amazon has the covers for Resurrection and I Am a Dalek on their site now. I don't know what the rule is on using them in Wikipedia but I thought I'd pass that along. 23skidoo 18:04, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Usually I upload either that or what's upon TimeLash.com's TARDIS Library. I decide betwixt the two on which image is more worthy of uploading. DrWho42 21:39, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Amazon book cover images

message: I bought the books today and I obviously have the back covers. Should I add them to the article?
Cophew, 17:56, 2 April 2006 (GMT)
:If you're talking about the back cover text, no. That would be a copyright violation - that's why we've rephrased them. --khaosworks (talk • contribs) 17:35, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Back Cover Descriptions 

message: Just for the record: the Gallifreyan numbers on the spines of the recently released Tenth Doctor novels are:
*7 The Stone Rose
*8 The Feast of the Drowned
*9 The Resurrection Casket
This would seem to support the notion that as far as BBC Books is concerned, the Ninth and Tenth Doctor novels are part of the same series (the Ninth Doctor novels were numbered 1–6).  (The Gallifreyan numbers are also used for chapter headings inside the books, which helps in deciphering them.)  —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 18:55, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gallifreyan numbers
Talk:Hewlêr

message: I did a wdiff between this article, Hewler, and Arbil. The anonymous user 137.122.88.223 seems to have created this article by copying plain text from Arbil, changing Arbil to Hewlêr, then adding a note about the Arbil/Erbil name. The same anonymous user then copied the contents of this article to create the Hewler article.
So it seems that the "merge" would simply involve changing both the Hewler and Hewlêr articles into redirects, and removing the internal link in the word "Hewlêr" in the Arbil article. Nothing really need to be "merged" per se because all the contents are just copied from Arbil.—Wing 04:55, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I can understand why someone would like this article at the Kurdish name of the city, but that goes against the Wikipedia:naming conventions. Anything original in this article (I'm not even sure if there is anything original here) should be merged into Arbil, and this article should be changed into a redirect to Arbil. I'll see if I can emphasize the Kurdish name in that artice. --Gareth Hughes 12:28, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: No, I did a wdiff to check the articles and found that there is nothing original in this article.—Wing 13:18, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

text: OK. This article does not have a major edit history and has cribbed the Arbil article. I've been decisive and changed this to a redirect. I've also gone through the Arbil article with some improvements. In some places, I thought it was better to call the city Hewlêr/Arbil in that article. --Gareth Hughes 16:09, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Street Fighter Alpha: Generations

message: My god this is the worst article I've read to date. Rewrite it, please, for god's sake. Everything reads like a fanboy's transcript you'd see on a craplousy anime forum.PsychoJosh 08:34, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: what is wrong with the person who wrote this?!?

message: going to edit this today, but going college:D
><ino 05:15, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: ramblings of dangerous stupids below. do not read.

message: yes ive seen the movie on dvd, and Sheng Long is not real, as I stated before i believe its retsu a shorinji monk that was a good friend of goukens.
An yeah i think the movie sucked too.
And im pretty sure its neither a prequal or a sequal its just someone elses version of events (made by comlpetely differnt people and non of them were made by capcom.) 
I believe capcomusa bought the Rights to street fighter from capcom japan so the future of street fighter looks dim.
HappyDragon 13:56, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shen Long is not a real character 

message: I've reassessed this as a stub.  The B assessment was either wrong or a joke.  BrokenSphereMsg me 17:45, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: B class assessment

message: Had to edit the story whoever wrote it didnt watch it. Goutetsu doesnt use Shun Gouku Satsu or even attempt to he was preparing a super hadouken when Akuma used the move on him. The reason he even says the name is he is surprised Akuma knows the most advanced technique of there style, which is forbidden. Akuma doesnt use it on Ryu either if he did Ryu would have been killed as he doesnt know how to empty his soul to stop it. Akuma uses a super Hadouken which he had used earlier in the battle as well but missed. Akuma doesnt use Shun Gouku Satsu on Ryu because he no longer feels he is equal to himself which is the only reason he uses it on an opponent.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jlem1484 (talk • contribs) 20:00, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did they watch this movie or what? 

message: I can't tell if this movie was animated or a motion picture. Should probably be mentioned somewhere in the opening paragraph (or opening sentence even?).--Jeff79 (talk) 19:27, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Animated?
Talk:David Crosby

message: @Beatlemania2002, please discuss before making further reversions. Valereee (talk) 20:50, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  date 

message: What does this mean: "the San Francisco milieu that had abetted so well on his solo album"
Is that the milieu that Crosby abetted? Or is it the milieu that abetted Crosby? 
'Abet' is commonly used in the phrase 'aid and abet', usually in reference to a crime or other malfeasance. (The fine legal distinction: 'aid' is to actually help. 'Abet' is to encourage, but not aid.) It is always used in reference to two parties: A abets B. MartinRinehart (talk) 15:19, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  who abetted whom? 

message: It’s been a couple weeks now but still missing the location where he died (ie: city, state) 24.219.11.107 (talk) 12:48, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added info with sources to the article regarding his death at Santa, Inez, California, where he owned a horse ranch at which he had planned to have his funeral. Carlstak (talk) 16:36, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Place of death? 

message: So I'm using a different account then I did when I replied to the original topic suggesting that Crosby's infobox image should be changed, but I've come to dislike "Option D", which is the current image featured in the infobox. Specifically, the microphone partially obscures his face. Also, I don't feel an Image from 1983 really captures the image the average person would think of when they think of Crosby. I'm going to suggest either reverting the image back to what it was before his death. Alternatively, I found this image on the commons that I personally like a lot and feel would be the all-around best option. Cropping would definitely be required but I think it's better then all the previous options. I've included a link to the image before, and I'd like to see what others think about it. 
 DriveAllKnight (talk) 17:07, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfC on Infobox Image (Again)
Talk:Dan Rice

message: It differs from Find-A-Grave. Lincher 12:41, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll look into it. I may look and see if I can reword some of these sentences as well - some of them strike me as very awkward. Ministry of Silly Walks 04:26, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of death

message: Two Biographies "Dan Rice: The Most Famous Man You've Never Heard Of" and "The life of Dan Rice" both give his birth date as January 25, 1823. Thisdaytrivia (talk) 00:38, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of Birth
Talk:Kep Enderby

message: Should be merged with Keppel Enderby Sumthingweird 04:10, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I understand that Enderby provided advice to Governor-General Kerr and/or Prime Minister Whitlam. Kerr was not happy with this advice and sought seperate advice from High Court Sir Garfield Barwick, CJ. Can this be confirmed? Jherschel (talk) 10:10, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Role as Attorney General in [[1975 Australian constitutional crisis]] 
Talk:Lantingji Xu

message: Is there somebody capable and friendly enough to translate the text. Thank you. --Immanuel Giel 10:53, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks a lot. --Immanuel Giel 13:54, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation please 

message: You know you're reading bad Sinological scholarship when something is described as (yet another) "fusion of the Confucianism, Buddhism and Taoism."  In fact, through its allusions, the text criticizes both Confucius (in the phrase 死生亦大矣) and Zhuangzi (一死生).  Sometimes conventional wisdom about "harmonious fusion" is so strong that it leads people to ignore the text right in front of them. 98.115.255.240 (talk) 09:30, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "a fusion of the Confucianism, Buddhism and Taoism"
Talk:Freehold

message: freehold
n. 
any interest in real property which is a life estate or of uncertain or undetermined duration (having no stated end), as distinguished from a leasehold which may have declining value toward the end of a long-term lease (such as the 99-year variety).
The People's Law Dictionary by Gerald and Kathleen Hill
There is also a Freehold, New York. It is in Greenville Town in Greene County, and sits at the intersection of State Route 32 and County Route 67. 
Mcgeedo (talk) 01:54, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You know this actually isn't comprehensible English (legalese in first half of post above). Please keep in mind that Wikipedia is not a Bar Association luncheon. Cliffswallow-vaulting (talk) 15:55, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Talk:Minneapolis-Moline

message: Much, much more is coming, but I need to assemble more information. - Nmpls 05:58, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Quadratic programming

message: Why does it say "Even if Q has only one negative eigenvalue..." but that's covered by the statement preceeding about indefinite Q.  So it seems silly and confusing to have a 2nd special-case statement here.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.197.232.50 (talk) 04:44, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Complexity

message: Can the article please explain what the symbol \preceq means? I have a Ph.D. in maths and I don't know! --Dr Greg 12:36, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. It's only because I know what it should mean that I could explain it; the symbol is not in wide use. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 13:22, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  The symbol is in wide use in the optimization community, so I think it's fine to have it (but I do agree that it should be defined) Lavaka (talk) 23:13, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Please define your terms

message: This edit claims that the constraints in a Quadratic Programming problem can be quadratic. However, the rest of the article assumes that they are linear. Also, the definition in the book of Nocedal and Wright (p. 449, at the start of Chapter 16, in the second edition) states that the constraints in quadratic programming are linear, as does the QP page in the NEOS Guide. I would be very interested in references to the literature stating that the constraints can be quadratic as this goes against everything I have seen. For the moment, the definition with linear constraint is the only one supported by the references, so I reverted again. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 09:41, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If also the constraints are quadratic it is called a quadratically constrained quadratic program (QCQP). Reference: Boyd & Vandenberghe : Convex Optimization. --Petter (talk) 16:50, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition 

message: As an experienced programmer with a solid background in math, I find the title very undescriptive if not misleading. I am suggesting that the title should be replaced by "Quadratic Optimization" and, "quadratic programming" should be the title of a redirection page pointing this article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Condmatstrel (talk • contribs) 09:52, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  page title is undescriptive/misleading 

message: There is link to XPRESS (newspaper)... What connection has XPRESS Solver  to XPRESS (newspaper)? Jumpow (talk) 17:36, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  XPRESS =>XPRESS (newspaper)
Talk:Laura Foy

message: Hi, I have a issue on this article with a user by the name of Salvag (See: User:Salvag) He apperently has a problem with any information added that is not his own. He has reverted factual information for no seemingly purpose. After discussing this with another user it turns out that this has been a problem before but he's recieved no official warning. Please do not edit or revert factual information in an attempt to only preserve your content and your content alone. These actions have probally gone un-noticed or deminished on the larger articles but it is blatent here. Please do not do it again.
 --Alt 01:50, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I see no mention of that supposed fact on the external link, nor on any other bios about her. Please provide proof of this claim. Hadiz 14:36, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sans Mention of =JUDGECAL'S= High Weirdness Hour
Talk:RFC

message: I had to delete the entry for this supposed acronym, as a quoted google lookup of the phrase returned a single result.  Silly wikipedians... Subversive 06:46, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Random Flying Couch, eh?

message: I noticed this page is missing an acronyn:RFC as Replication Factor C (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Replication_factor_C) in eukaryotc cell replication.
I'm trying to edit it, but i thought it was good to let others know.
Subversive 16:55:44, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Another modification

message: The automatical linking of RFC nnnn (for number nnnn) is a MediaWiki feature, shouldn't RFC redirect directly to Request for Comments?  Some years ago this was allowed with a link to a disambiguation page on the top of this most likely "target" page. –82.113.121.52 (talk) 05:19, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Is this the most likely target page? What evidence is there for that claim? --Harumphy (talk) 23:00, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Request for Comments]]
Talk:Franz Stock

message: von www.franz-stock.org mit Zustimmung übernommen
I don't know where to begin with this article. I'm hesitant to make drastic changes to it since I'm new at it, but it really needs a good rewrite. I'm going to make a leap and move it from the wikify stack to the clean-up stack. Syzergy 07:05, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Not sure if this is something that's lost in translation or what, but this quote from the article is lost on me: "Abbé Franz Stock — that is no name, it is a program!" Can anyone clarify? --Fullobeans (talk) 06:58, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name? Program? 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.catholicnews.com/data/stories/cns/1201560.htm. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  MER-C 11:22, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed