Talk:Robot Rock (song)

message: Sub Focus samples this tune in his song "Rock It". He uses the main guitar chord and then chops up the lead to create a new tune. Should this information be added to this article?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.233.174.154 (talk) 05:43, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Sub Focus Sample

message: I edited this one to remove some weasling POV - it insinuated that Daft Punk had somehow been deceitful/plagaristic in their use of the Breakwater sample ("borderline theft"). This is daft (ahem), since Breakwater's Kae Williams is given a songwriting credit on the record sleeve, and also the sample acknowledgement is printed - thus the whole thing is cleary done through the normal industry publishing and sample-clearing channels, with nothing underhand or deceptive about it.--feline1 23:31, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for your contribution. I clarified the issue by adding info on the clearance mentioned in the liner notes. Just64helpin 16:28, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weasel words 

message: Any sources that the vocals are made with a talk box? It sounds a lot more like a vocoder to me. 84.217.142.11 21:38, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Only one note is sung, which makes it hard to discern. Feel free to change the info if you find a source. Just64helpin 18:31, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Talk box? Not vocoder?

message: :Image:RobotRock.DaftPunk.single.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:45, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:RobotRock.DaftPunk.single.jpg

message: :Image:RobotRock.DaftPunk.single.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 04:39, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:RobotRock.DaftPunk.single.jpg

message: Why is "many critics found the song overly repetitive" in the first encyclopedic sentence regarding a techno TRACK (song..?? Duhhh)
From there, the article gets worse, but others have already commented about that above, only to be rebukked by farcical arguments defending the sentences.  
(Ideal World Request: Can someone who knows Daft Punk get them to edit at least some of the article to add technical details and remove foolish sentences, please?)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.250.110.197 (talk) 22:44, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Techno track criticised for being too repetitive