Talk:Tewkesbury Abbey

message: ==Untitled==
Please join our project to upgrade Gloucestershire-related articles to featured status.
 Mike |talk</div> 16:38, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: How can the reduction of an entire unwanted new section advertising guided tours of the Abbey be seen as "a form of advertising". And how does reference to a church booklet and photogaphy permit constitute a breach of church copyright? I think a short note on photograohy restrictions is very appropriate in the Worship section, is also generally useful and should be retained. Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:55, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Might have been something I missed. It appeared to me as if the whole thing was put back when I looked first. Still not a fan of the statement that is there but that may have something to do with my distaste for the practice of charging photographers to photograph historic structures then saying they are restricted in what they can do with the photographs. Saffron Blaze (talk) 00:18, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I see. I think readers should be warned! A small footnote would be fine, and possibly better, since it's difficult to see where this information logically fits. Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 07:44, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Help improve our long-awaited [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Gloucestershire|Wikiproject]]!

message: Please join our project to upgrade Gloucestershire-related articles to featured status.
 Mike |talk</div> 16:38, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is now St Mary Redcliffe church in Bristol the second-largest parish church?  [[Benbristol]  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.233.59.250 (talk) 10:30, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Size 

message: Not only is this addition a form of advertising it is not clear the churches position of retaining copyright in this manner is legal. It should have stay removed.Saffron Blaze (talk) 21:06, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: How can the reduction of an entire unwanted new section advertising guided tours of the Abbey be seen as "a form of advertising". And how does reference to a church booklet and photogaphy permit constitute a breach of church copyright? I think a short note on photograohy restrictions is very appropriate in the Worship section, is also generally useful and should be retained. Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:55, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Might have been something I missed. It appeared to me as if the whole thing was put back when I looked first. Still not a fan of the statement that is there but that may have something to do with my distaste for the practice of charging photographers to photograph historic structures then saying they are restricted in what they can do with the photographs. Saffron Blaze (talk) 00:18, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I see. I think readers should be warned! A small footnote would be fine, and possibly better, since it's difficult to see where this information logically fits. Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 07:44, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tewkesbury_Abbey&oldid=497433486 

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Tewkesbury Abbey 2011.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on September 5, 2013. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2013-09-05. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:20, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Tewkesbury Abbey 2011.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon 

message: The claim does not seem to be supported by sources. This website http://www.wearechurch.net/list-of-largest-parish-churches-in-country/ does not include it in the top fifteen, though that may be because it was excluded from the sample. In any case, a reliable source for the claim is needed. Ghughesarch (talk) 00:47, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second largest parish church in the country? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Tewkesbury Abbey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070313032627/http://www.charities-database.co.uk/201845.html to http://www.charities-database.co.uk/201845.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:37, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:48, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: Although a citation is mentioned, I would just like to point out that the flood waters of the River Severn did not reach the Abbey - it was flooded to a number of inches by groundwater : I helped sandbag the entrance and lived just across. Birmingham1965 (talk) 02:08, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flooding