Talk:Thursday (band)

message: I think Thursday is flat out great, no matter what "genre" you want to put them into.  As far as I see it, Thursday is unlike any band I have heard before.  Maybe we should call it "Thursday_x_core"  <--- *sarcasm*  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.177.205.243 (talk) 21:12, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: For one, I wholeheartedly disagree, as I'm not even sure that an "Emo Progressive" genre actually exists. Plus, without an actual source CALLING them "Emo Progressive", we aren't going to change the genre. Rwiggum (Talk/Contrib) 18:06, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Genre

message: Can't we just call them a rock band? All these labels - "Screamo", "emo-hardcore", whatever, are so debated and thrown around that they don't even mean anything. I'm not a "genre-pedant" or a "scenester" - being 17 in this town, "the scene" is ubiqitous. --Tothebarricades.tk 19:44, 24 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: The point is this is an encyclopaedia, and important information about bands, such as their genre, should be included. Thursday are definitely emo. More of a post-hardcore-ish emo, less of the modern pop-punk emo stuff, but emo. --Switch 12:37, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

text: But anyway, it doesn't matter what genre we think they are, because we need to go by the sources. Numerous sources cite them as post-hardcore, so I don't think that's arguable, but I've also found a few that call them screamo, so I've added that. Please don't remove it before discussing here. -- FatalError 23:50, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Old genre discussion

message: :Image:Thursday-logo2.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 05:10, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Thursday-logo2.png

message: The other day I spent a while cleaning up the article because it was a mess. Links were used instead of references, quotes were uncited, and there were many phrases and sentences with an unencyclopedic tone. I hope it looks better. Also, I added screamo to the genre list in the infobox, because unfortunately that's what the sources say, however wrong it is. If anyone requests that I add more for verification, I will. Oh, and can I remove that "unreferenced" template now? We have a total of 8 sources in the article, but I don't know if that's enough to consider it verifiable. -- FatalError 23:54, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, ideally almost everything should be sourced. Information about the band like "The band began playing basement shows in New Brunswick and surrounding New Jersey and New York areas." or "Thursday originally toyed with the idea of double album" should really be sourced. But more importantly any opinions like "A City by the Light Divided was generally received well by critics, and spawned two singles, "Counting 5-4-3-2-1" and "At This Velocity", though the latter received considerably less attention."; and anything strongly worded/not neutral/with a POV like "Hesitant to join a larger label, but with full support from Eyeball Records". should definitely have a source. You're doing a good job so far. I've replaced the Unrefenced template with a Refimprove template. kollision (talk) 03:08, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well keep in mind that this was all done in under an hour. I didn't really even read the whole article, I just fixed things that popped out at me. But I'll work some more on it. It has the potential to be a great article, it just has a lot of little mistakes. Thanks. -- FatalError 03:56, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: That entire section (or almost) is copied from here. I wouldn't doubt that other parts of the article are as well, though I don't have the time to check right now. If someone could rewrite that, it would be really appreciated. If no one does it, I'll get around to it sometime in the next few days when I'm not bombarded with homework. Or at least find the original source before I get going with that. Thanks. -- FatalError 04:13, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh...just kidding then. They didn't have a source or anything so I figured they wrote it. Thanks for letting me know. -- FatalError 05:43, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  A City by the Light Divided 

message: The image :Image:Thursday-counting54321.ogg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here.  In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.  Please check
:* That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
:* That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --13:32, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image copyright problem with Image:Thursday-counting54321.ogg

message: These have been moved here from a subpage as part of a cleanup process. See Wikipedia:Discontinuation of comments subpages.
I have assessed this article as C-class and identified the following areas for improvement:
* The article needs inline citations
* The article needs references
shirulashem (talk) 19:28, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comments

message: The statement under the heading War All the Time about MTV banning the video for the song "War All the Time" because of "controversial material involving a fake news feed that appeared to be real and teenagers being weapon targets" is not supported by the cited source.  The cited source is merely a blog and makes no mention of a fake news feed, teenagers, weapons, or targets.  A better source would be an MTV press release stating why MTV decided to ban the video.  If no one knows with any certainty whether or why MTV banned the video, I'd like to delete that statement from the article.  BillyPreset (talk) 00:51, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with your logic here. Go ahead and remove it. If someone can manage to find a proper source that provides more information on this topic in the future, it could easily be added back. Fezmar9 (talk) 01:01, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "War All the Time" Banned by MTV? 

message: Anything regarding how the band got their name sourced or not? • GunMetal Angel 22:13, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Band name 

message: An image used in this article, File:Thursday-counting54321.ogg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 20 June 2012 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Thursday-counting54321.ogg)
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 11:21, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Thursday-counting54321.ogg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Thursday (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://archive.is/20120710191216/http://intunemusiconline.com/content/review-thursday-common-existence/ to http://intunemusiconline.com/content/review-thursday-common-existence/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:39, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: First, is anyone willing to add the fact that My Chemical Romance announced that Thursday would play with them on MCR's reunion show in LA?
Second, what about the plane crash that Thursday was in during the writing of A City By The Light Divided? They even wrote two songs about it, which appeared on ACBTLD.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by OfficalKevinOsmond (talk • contribs) 12:51, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two things