lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Calvaria (skull)

message: * Redirection from "calvarium" does not negate the need for its mention, if not more careful definition/description. <BR>
* I have seen "calvarium" carefully used to refer to only the upper dome of the skull, only the egg shaped bone parts that enclose the brain, only the contiguous bones of the head (excluding primarily the jaw, but presumably the other loose bones and teeth), and a room, cave, or tomb used to contain many skulls.<BR>
* The word comes from the cultural and literary idea of a bare or grassy hill or dome containing or holding the spirit or soul.  By analogy, a natural or artificial hill used for public execution, or alternatively for tombs, or the dome of a cathedral/mosque containing the living spirit of a community, or the (human) skull containing the spirit of an individual.  (see also golgotha or bowler hat)<BR>Wikidity (talk) 01:22, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

message: using criteria: "the skullcap calotte calvaria" (google)
F P Lisowski (University of Tasmania) 1998 - A Guide to Dissection of the Human Body, p.405, World Scientific Publishing Company, 15 December 1998 
Bernard Wood (2015) - Wiley-Blackwell Student Dictionary of Human Evolution edited by Bernard Wood, p.49, John Wiley & Sons, 23 February 2015
Lawrence M. Witmer PhD, https://people.ohio.edu/witmerl/Downloads/Skull.pdf, Ohio University
W. Crone https://s10.lite.msu.edu/res/msu/botonl/b_online/library/crone/3048/lablist023.html Hudson valley community college
using criteria: "calotte calvaria" 
(google books)
(french language) Marc Waelkens, Jeroen Poblome (Professor of Archaeology at KU Leuven) - Sagalassos II: Report on the Third Excavation Campaign of 1992 p.262, Leuven University Press 1993, ISBN	9061865743, ISBN 9789061865742 
(google)
PV Tobias - ‎1972 (not available in abstract) p.8 of google search criteria return) ".. the calotte or roof of the calvaria ..."
 
Diametakomisi (talk) 16:56, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi , sorry I am a little confused. Isn't a calotte a felt skull cap used in religious contexts? Here we are talking about an anatomical area. I therefore worry your search terms may lead to selection bias. Would you mind explaining what areas of this article you feel need changing and how? I will try and help out. --Tom (LT) (talk) 00:02, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: calvaria isn't the skullcap

message: Large arachnoid granulation. Iam having memory loss and my balance is off. 2603:9000:7B01:964B:1C51:88BD:1A61:541B (talk) 17:51, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arachnoid calvarial granulation
Talk:Neurolathyrism

message: No mention of treatment or even if the damage is permanent. This is a severe lack. Halfelven 20:04, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Treatment? 

message: This article could use a "Treatment" section addressing these questions:
* Is lathyrism treatable?
* Is the damage permanent?
* Can it be fatal?
I expect these questions could be answered with a little research but I don't have time for it at the moment. Augurar (talk) 05:15, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Treatment and prognosis
Talk:Monfalcone

message: hi, i'm from monfalcone...
the patron is "Madonna della salute" 21 november,
sant'ambrogio is the name of principal church (sant'ambrogio is 7 december)
thanks
(davide: mailto:cltossut@tiscali.it)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.205.241.124 (talk) 10:44, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  patron 
Talk:Kitty Norville

message: Okay, I've gone nutty updating this page since Carrie Vaughn has impressed me with her writing style. I'm not so good at writing summaries, but I'm quite happy to put up themes and important plot points.  I do need to reread to get the specific names for characters since I've been doing this off the top of my head at work. Any categories or other things that should be expanded? anyone want to do plot summaries?  Anyone else actually doing upkeep on this page? 64.50.201.98 17:22, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm here to help; I have too many things on my plate right now to really work on these, but I have an eye on them and will be happy to help you with any wikification questions you have. I'll try and explain here if I make bigger edits. --Thespian 22:42, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Template talk:Colleges under National University in Bangladesh

message: Is there a reference showing that these, and only these, are the colleges listed as University colleges under National University? No need to add that to the template, just curious as to how this list was compiled. --Ragib
*Articles on colleges mention they are affiliated by the national university.And that might be the source.Furhter sources can be found on their website or online news edition (newspaper, banglapedia).--NAHID 12:35, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, but aren't all degree colleges affiliated with the National university? I know someone who started a college himself (while being an undergrad himself), and got affiliation from NU. So, there *are* hundreds and hundreds of colleges that are affiliated with NU. This by itself doesn't merit a template. --Ragib 16:46, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Most of the colleges are older enough to get affiliation from NU.I think, not all the person own the colleges by themselves.The colleges have to prove better educational structure before getting affiliation from NU.--NAHID 17:46, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Any references/citations from NU about this? Also, any on the number of colleges that are under NU? Also, why is this titled "Public colleges" when Notre Dame isn't one? --Ragib 17:58, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Colleges under national university offers Higher Secondary and Degree (pass) programmes, as well as Honours and Masters.For your sources of NU you can check (NDC homepage) and (NDC on Banglapedia).Also, Kumudini college on (Banglapedia).Other sources can also be found here (see the 10th paragraph) and (NU). Other colleges (affiliated under NU) info also available there. The template can be moved to college instead of public college. --NAHID 19:08, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: According to Banglapedia , there were at least 462 degree colleges that are under NU. So, listing only a few on this template is misleading. --Ragib 19:23, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  But only few are exist here. I found a feature some thing like more..... at the bottom of some templates. If they are added here in future !!! (I doubt whether they can be added ) we could use that feature.--NAHID 19:44, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: All I am saying is that, this is different from the "List of public universities", which is a small enough list to have a nav template. But how do you decide what college out of the 462+ to include or exclude? Deciding that will be a POV. So, this template is not a good idea because, a) it is incomplete, and doesn't represent what it claims to be, b) is inherently POV via inclusion of only a few colleges, c) unmaintainable as a nav template with 400/500+ listings is better served via categories. --Ragib 19:56, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: List
Talk:Southern Line (Auckland)

message: Could someone please rearrange and update the table to reflect the Pukekohe electrification and the new/under construction stations, as I have no idea how to edit the table without screwing it up. Also, please see Template talk:Southern Line (Auckland) RDT#Pukekohe electrification. Thanks, Fork99 (talk) 08:55, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stations on the line table
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Motörhead/Assessment

message: As you may have heard, we at the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial Team recently made some changes to the assessment scale, including the addition of a new level.  The new description is available at WP:ASSESS.
*The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.  
*The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.  
*A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.  
Each WikiProject should already have a new C-Class category at :Category:C-Class_articles.  If your project elects not to use the new level, you can simply delete your WikiProject's C-Class category and clarify any amendments on your project's assessment/discussion pages.  The bot is already finding and listing C-Class articles. 
Please leave a message with us if you have any queries regarding the introduction of the revised scheme.  This scheme should allow the team to start producing offline selections for your project and the wider community within the next year.  Thanks for using the Wikipedia 1.0 scheme! For the 1.0 Editorial Team, §hepBot (Disable) 20:47, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes to the WP:1.0 assessment scheme

message: I thought this WikiProject might be interested. Ping me with any specific queries or leave them on the page linked to above. Thanks!  - Jarry1250 (t, c) 22:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Milestone Announcements
Talk:Little people

message: This is purely an issue of grammar, I changed the first letters to lowercase in the first parts because there's no reason for them to be upper in common usage, just in organization titles where they tend to make EVERYTHING uppercase (except things like of/the). Tyciol (talk) 22:37, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Uppercase to lowercase

message: from Troy_Town:
Many of the stone labyrinths around the Baltic coast of Sweden were built by fishermen during rough weather and were believed to entrap evil spirits, the "smågubbar" or "little people" who brought bad luck. The fishermen would walk to the centre of the labyrinth, enticing the spirits to follow them, and then run out and put to sea.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.250.5.143 (talk) 23:11, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  an addition 

message: See User talk:Theoldsparkle#Little people for a discussion between two editors on what to include here. – Fayenatic (talk) 17:21, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: "See also" links
Talk:Staranzano

message: I'm going to delete it, as in this municipality AFAIK there's no application of law 482/1999 (protection of linguistic minorities, e.g. bilingual road signs etc.).--Riccardo.fabris (talk) 12:57, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Slovenian toponym
Talk:Turriaco

message: I'm pretty suprised that a Slovenian translation is written near the name of Turriaco, San Pier and many of our communes, because NOBODY here speak slovenian as mother tongue. Althought the word "bisiaco" (which is the term used to refer the people who lives in our territory) comes probably from a Slovenian word, the languange widely spoken is Italian, because the territory was occupated by venetians immigrates long time ago. The Bisiaco, our language, is in fact a variation of the venetian language with strong influences from "Friulano" (the language spoken around Udine), some words taken from German and a really weak Slovenian influence. The Slovenian is spoken mostly in the highlands near the Slovenian limit, territories that have not much in common with our land. Only in Ronchi there are road panels with two languages, but it can be considered more a left-oriented political action then a real need. So it would be better to change the second name and write it not in slovenian, but in bisiaco, which is exectly what I'm going to do.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.17.237.77 (talk) 18:18, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slovenian?!? 
Talk:Heat recovery steam generator

message: The diagram shows a IGCC.  Shouldn't this be on the IGCC page?
Oh, I see we don't have a IGCC page.  Perhaps some further authoring is required, as HRSG, IGCC and combined cycle are each very different concepts. PeterHewett 09:27, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: IGCC?
Talk:Phalanges of the hand

message: *knuckles. --Jerome Potts (talk) 05:58, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing vocabulary ? 

message: Which phalange is numbered first, the one closest to the hand, or the one at the tip ? --Jerome Potts (talk) 06:03, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Well the French number them outwardly, P1, P2, and P3 at the tip, so i suppose that it's the same in English. --Jerome Potts (talk) 06:06, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Numbering
Talk:Putting It Together

message: I just added some necessary formatting because it should not have been in the lead. Any thoughts? Treditor200 (talk) 01:49, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formatting 
Talk:Nitrogen inversion

message: What is "optically stable" and why is it called that? Does it refer to the polarizing effects on light?
Also, how fast does the interconversion occur? 
Finally, how is the "width" of the barrier defined, and in what units? 
178.38.41.220 (talk) 18:20, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: — the width of the barrier is defined from the (relative) position of the nitrogen’s nucleus wrt ligands, or wrt the overall centre of mass (the difference between those is some dimensionless factor). It has the Length dimension, expressed in such units as nanometres. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 12:52, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarify 

message: If ammonia is a symmetric pyramid then just looking at it upside-down inverts it, so I don't get it. 92.24.35.68 (talk) 18:06, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have difficulty picturing the process? We could make some graphics to illustrate several intermediate structures if you think that would help. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wmKFEiWg9XY for an animation. --Ben (talk) 18:16, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks for the snappy reply. I am not, even remotely, a chemist (work in IT) so I suspect my understanding of what chirality is may be flawed. The video described perfectly what I expected, but <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chirality_%28chemistry%29> says "A chiral molecule/ion is non-superposable on its mirror image". Ok, and if you look at the accompanying image, left-hand and right-hand amino acids, I get it - if you mirror-reflect one of the amino acids you can't wrangle it back to it's non-reflected form by any kind of rotation. Just can't. However if you take the ammonia molecule and its inverted form, you can trivially rotate one back to superimpose on the other perfectly, AFAICS. So it's not chiral per the wiki definition. What am I missing? 92.24.35.68 (talk) 21:12, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

text: That's a very good point, the introductory paragraph in this article is a little misleading at present. Ammonia is not a chiral molecule so it cannot have its chirality inverted. However, it still undergoes nitrogen inversion. I'll update the article accordingly. --Ben (talk) 08:35, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  Good stuff, thanks 92.24.34.179 (talk) 15:11, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  how can this work - a pyramid has no handed-ness (chirality) AFAICS 

message: Can we create a ammonia model using equations Akshay Dhan (talk) 17:10, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explain the quantum tunneling in ammonia molecule 

message: As the articles are mostly redundant in that they both mostly refer to nitrogen inversion, I suggest merging them into the hierarchically superior Pyramidal inversion article. One might then think about expanding a bit on pyramidal inversions involving other elements (which I would have done myself if I was more confident in my knowledge of Structural Chemistry...) --Jan Lukas Hobrock (talk) 15:26, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging to [[Pyramidal inversion]]
Talk:Clickteam

message: What Happened to the pages for their products, why were they deleted?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.143.8.161 (talk) 02:57, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: As far as I can tell Multimedia Fusion was proposed for deletion because of the following concern: "Unsourced, no demonstration of notability. Tagged for cleanup more than two years without improvement." --Joshtek (talk) 18:09, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  What happened 

message: I added a few books that reference Clickteam and its various software packages, I plan to do further research and begin a rewrite/revision of this article to improve the nuetrality and the overall of ammount information provided.Jdcollins13 (talk) 22:18, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: dang I forgot to sign, anyway does anyone know any additional history about the company? Any additional info, or any help would be really appreciated.Jdcollins13 (talk) 22:18, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition of sources 

message: Klik is an unreferenced article that substantially duplicates the contents of this article. Any unique content found there could be merged here. This was an option suggested at the AfD discussion for Klik linked here.--Wtshymanski (talk) 21:36, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggest merge
Talk:Glenoid fossa

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
----
* :Glenoid cavity → 
* :Glenoid fossa → ?
– I propose a move to the more commonly used title, glenoid fossa. N-gram: . Also the TA2 english term and FMA preferred term. Tom (LT) (talk) 22:30, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Note: Glenoid fossa titles a page with content and so it must also be dispositioned. If this request is granted, then Glenoid fossa may be deleted or moved to Glenoid fossa (disambiguation) and tagged with  in accordance with WP:ONEOTHER. P.I. Ellsworth  ed. put'r there 23:03, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 14 May 2021
Talk:Selby Canal

message: The Edwards 1985 reference needs an entry in the Bibliography section. Keith D (talk) 22:35, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Edwards
Talk:Acromion

message: Hi,
I just added a new reference (Sammarco 2000) I found for the prevalence of os acromiale, which gives a number of 1-15 percent, as opposed to the old figure here of only 1.4.  That number was unsourced, and I'm not an anatomy student and so have no reason to doubt it - but I just wanted to know if there was a newer or different number.  But I was surprised when I found the number in Sammarco 2000 that was (possibly) so much higher.
Does anyone else have any other info?
:J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000 Mar;82(3):394-400.
:"Os acromiale: frequency, anatomy, and clinical implications."
:Sammarco VJ.
:
Jimw338 (talk) 06:26, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  New prevalence number for os acromiale - 1 to 15 percent ?
Talk:Coracoid process

message: This source says it is present, and describes the coracoid process of monotremes as "hypertrophied": https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280624457_Origin_of_the_mammalian_shoulder
This source however says that the coracoid process is a unique feature of the therian mammals (i.e. marsupials and placentals): https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2100248/
So, what is the answer? Does anyone have knowledge on this subject that can shed a light on the right answer?
Just for reference to myself really if someone helps me out, this is the basic structure I would use to convey this info, replacing the kinda awkward wording of the first paragraph currently present in the "Other animals" section:
The coracoid process is a feature present in mammals. In monotremes, reptiles, birds and frogs (but not salamanders), a separate bone called the coracoid is present, but it is not homologous with the coracoid process.(citation goes here)
Zigongosaurus1138 (talk) 20:33, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the coracoid process present in monotremes? Conflicting information 

message: This article contains a number of syntax and grammar errors, as well as several sentences which appear to be gibberish, unless they are using technical language which is undefined. In several cases, the intent of the sentence is completely obscured by the language used, such that correction of the sentence is infeasible. How should this be approached? 
As an example, "The distances between the coracoid base and the neurovascular structures is like a 90 degree chair." While the subject-verb disagreement is easily fixed, the idea this sentence is attempting to convey is... what? Fixing the verb to agree in number does not make the idea clear; the sentence needs to be rewritten in some way. The citations for the "lighthouse of the shoulder" idea that would also presumably shed light on the "90-degree chair" concept are paywalled. Furthermore, this article https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2018.09.031 suggests that the distances depend on the position of the shoulder (which is facially valid, given that the shoulder is dynamic). Should the sentence be struck? How should the remaining examples of this kind of error be brought to editorial attention -- hidden text, perhaps? TheLeakestWink (talk) 18:31, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Syntactical and grammatical errors
Talk:Spine of scapula

message: This 'of'... 'of' article could surely be merged to Spine of Scapular with no detriment to the quality of either article; the quality would be improved by having greater context, rather than this needless fragmentation LT910001 (talk) 03:28, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I have completed this merge. --LT910001 (talk) 01:11, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Root of spine of scapula]]
Talk:Hamad Bin Khalifa Civilisation Center

message: Has this been built or what?--88.104.136.143 (talk) 18:46, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tense 

message: Found a source on the monetary issues facing the mosque published by Aarhus University:
* https://samtidsreligion.au.dk/aktuelt/nyheder/nyhed/artikel/konflikt-i-en-af-danmarks-mest-kendte-moskeer-1/
* https://pure.au.dk/portal/files/179577404/Konflikten_i_Hamad_bin_Kalifa_Civiliation_Center_19.02.pdf
The sources are in Danish. A Thousand Words (talk) 16:21, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Money conflict
Talk:High School Musical on Stage!

message: I think it would be a smart choice to list the fact that Albuquerque Little Theater had a show. This would apparently mark the first time that the city the play is set in has done one. Calebaldwinjun9 01:34, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Albuquerque Little Theater 

message: I just saw the show in London last week. In the article it says the balcony scene was cut in the stage version. It was present when I saw it. FreddyE (talk) 13:20, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: UK-Version

message: I added a modified 1 Act Version of the Musical, that was from MTI Shows. I edited it extensively amking it match WP formatiing, but id there anything else I need to do? Stealth (talk) 22:33, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question 
Talk:Kapeng barako

message: tangina ang hirap gawan ng term paper nito!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.97.242.115 (talk) 18:48, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

message: Who is the author of this article? 112.198.179.88 (talk) 10:14, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who is the author of this article?
Talk:Dart Valley Railway

message: From to this dab page / article:
:The South Devon Railway, which was reopened by Dart Valley Light Railway plc in 1969, ...
But according to our article Public limited company, the legal abbreviation plc was only introduced by the Companies Act of 1980. I suspect that in 1969, the Dart Valley Light Railway would have been a ltd rather than a plc. Anybody know for sure?. -- Chris j wood 10:23, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  which was reopened by Dart Valley Light Railway plc!