lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Dale Hoiberg

message: On 21 Feb 2005, this article was nominated for deletion.  There was no consensus.  See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Dale Hoiberg for a record of the discussion.
Hey he deserves more attention, just because he's mortal enemies with walles doesn't mean you should ignore him.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.167.19.11 (talk) 01:19, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: from Vfd
Talk:Lithium polymer

message: I'm trying to make this a disambiguation page, but I'm having a bit of trouble.
:I took this discussion to your talk page, since this page might be deleted soon. Reasons are stated there --grmwnr 01:23, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I was wrong, and this page will not be deleted, but please see your talk page for clarification anyway. --grmwnr 01:26, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Thumb

message: Should chamaeleons be included, as they are zygodactyl?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.78.17.52 (talk) 09:24, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible animals to be included 

message: There is consideration of a merger of the pages First finger, Second finger, Third finger and Fourth finger into a new page. Please discuss at Talk:First finger#Merge (2023), and . — HTGS (talk) 23:11, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  FYI: Merger of related pages
Talk:Chamberlain Group, Inc. v. Skylink Technologies, Inc.

message: This page is being revised over the next week as part of the
IP WikiProject. Echin (talk) 07:39, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: IP Wikiproject

message: Editors of Chamberlain v. Skylink are invited to work on Apple v. Does. —Christiaan 01:19, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Apple v. Does]]
Talk:Lee University

message: An unregistered editor is edit warring to insist that "alumni" only refers to people who graduated from an institution. As our article on this very word points out, that is not how the word is defined in most instances although it's a common understanding. If he or she believes that our definition is wrong, he or she is welcome to open a discussion in the appropriate place.
Alternatively, if he or she believes that the alumnus that he or she removing needs to have a clarification added to indicate that he did not graduate then that's totally fine. It's fairly common to do that in articles; I think I've seen something like "(attended but did not graduate)" and similar language used in many articles. If there are more helpful details about the circumstances and situation (e.g., "transferred to __ after __ semesters") then that can also be helpful for readers.
What he or she is not welcome to do is impose an idiosyncratic definition of this word, different from how it's used in other articles in this encyclopedia, in this one article. He or she is not welcome to try to change the definition by editing this one article and only using edit summaries. And he or she is definitely not welcome to remove this person from the article simply because he or she disagrees with or disapproves of this person. ElKevbo (talk) 04:09, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit warring to redefine "alumnus" 

message: Lee University’s Society for Law and Justice Mock Trial team is recognized as a prominent school for the academic activity of mock trial. 
Established in 2004, the Lee University Society for Law and Justice Mock Trial team annually competes at the highest level of collegiate mock trial in the American Mock Trial Association system. 66.168.102.26 (talk) 04:33, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Society for Law and Justice
Talk:Peter Thompson (Medal of Honor)

message: I hope you don't mind my rather radical rewrite.  I think I've kept all the content, but shifted it into the more flowing, prosaic style prefered by wikipedia (as opposed to the rather abrupt, telegraphic style one gets in biographical dictionaries and similar publications).  I think a couple of lines on Thompson's account of the battle would be good, and anything we can find out about his life after Homestate would be valuable too.  But frankly I'm shocked we don't have an article about the Homestake mine. --  00:25, 7 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite

message: I don't understand why the link to my Peter Thompson website was deleted. There has been a link on the Peter Thompson page to my website for years but I recently changed the URL and was merely trying to update with the correct new address. Granted, I am a self-described history buff but that doesn't mean that the many newspaper articles, obituaries, photos, etc. are not accurate. Indeed under the Reference section on this same Peter Thompson wikipage, there is a link to a PDF I transcribed from articles that Thompson wrote back in 1914. I certainly don't consider these as "disruptive" additions. Please reconsider. KG0GD (talk) 21:59, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Website content 

message: Does the controversy about his story have any connection with the actions that lead to his medal ?  (I suspect not).  I think that should be made clear.  -- Beardo 21:28, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversy / medal
Talk:Center Stage (2000 film)

message: The article linked to the American Ballet Academy and the American Ballet Company, which did not lead anywhere as the original author did not seem to realize that they were fictional. The company is very clearly based on either ABT or NYCB (or a combination of the two), so I made a note of that.  The academy may be based on the School of American Ballet, which is the academy leading into NYCB, or it may be entirely fictional.Input junkie 02:07, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: A note
Category talk:Spies

message: Proposition: there are two general subcats now (for nationality/period) as well as all the spies just listed as "spies". My suggestion is that a spy should only be unlisted from the main :Category:Spies if they have been listed on both a spies by nationality and a spies by period subcategory. This way, if the need arises for a new nationality or new period category to emerge, it will be really easy to find those people that should be put into it, they will all be floating around in Category:Spies (at least for those spies that don't require two nationalities or periods). Does this sound reasonable? I am worried it could be a breach of policy, but I think there is definite logic to it! --VivaEmilyDavies 02:18, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Damrong Rajanubhab

message: The prince was known most of his life as "Prince Disuankumaan". He was given the title "Damrong Rajanubhab" much later in his life. However, the latter became much more well-known, and most people would recognise him by that name only. I've therefore left the name of "Prince Damrong" in place in this edition, even before this title was conferred upon him. Any opinion? --Jakris 03:25, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess it would be quite confusing if the name changes in the middle of the article, so IMHO it's fine to use the most well known name throughout the article, but of course mention other names and name changes. Thus I think your additions are OK the way you did them. andy 15:51, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disuan or Damrong?
Talk:Yale Lary

message: What is "hang time"?
Pdn 03:28, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Fifteen months later..... it is the time the ball hangs in the air between the kick and the catch. The longer it is, the more time the kicking team has to get down the field to tackle the returner, so more is good. Danthemankhan 03:22, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Hang Time

message: The article claims that "in 1960 opponents averaged returns of less than one yard per punt."  I'd like to know the source for that.  It's fascinating, if true, but I don't beleive it is.  Anson2995 02:21, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Punting Stats

message: Sadly, Yale Lary passed away this morning.   http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2017/05/12/lions-hall-of-famer-yale-lary-dies-at-86/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.202.54.2 (talk) 13:59, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  His Passing 
Talk:GWR Caliph Class

message: This sentence
"The Great Western Railway Caliph Class 0-6-0 broad gauge steam locomotives for goods train work."
is not English as it has no verb, but I cannot fix it as I do not know what it means.
Pdn 03:32, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)

message: All modern references combine the Ariadne and Caliph classes as a single Standard Goods class, and I rpopose that these two articles are merged and renamed to reflect this. Geof Sheppard 12:27, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merger
Talk:Downtown San Jose

message: I removed the characterization of 1970s Downtown as a "red light district". That phrase describes an area that is primarily known for its open prostitution. While there certainly was much illegal and sleasy business downtown in the 70s, it was hardly a vice capital. It was simply another urban neighborhood suffering from the usual problems of the period: economic decline, the migration of the middle class to the suburbs, and drug-related crime. If you must use a glib, simplistic phrase for that set of urban problems, you'll have to find another one. ----Isaac R 07:15, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: "Red light district"

message: I changed the article to say that the area is pedestrian friendly, and has buildings shorter than 27 stories in height... the previous way it was written seemed to imply that the shortness of the buildings makes the area more friendly for pedestrians, which doesnt make sense to me. Street/sidewalk layout helps pedestrians, building height isnt an issue at all. BBnet3000 (talk) 05:26, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Pedestrian Friendly Scale?

message: The composite image subtitled "views of downtown" contains images that are not in downtown San Jose.. it seems the image is intended to represent all of San Jose, not just downtown.  --Frantik (talk) 18:49, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "views of downtown" 
Talk:Take Me Out (play)

message: The song Take Me Out by the band Franz Ferdinand isn't as notable as the Tony Award-winning play Take Me Out (play), so I'm moving the current article to Take Me Out (song). -- Cleduc 03:41, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd have to strongly disagree. A google search of "take me out" "frans ferdinand" returns over 500,000 matches; a search of "take me out" "broadway play" returns less than 20,000. 66.16.165.41 08:01, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Take Me Out now redirects to Take Me Out (disambiguation). Cleduc 08:21, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moving music article 

message: Why are so many listed here? This does not seem to be common practice with most Wiki articles about plays. ConoscoTutto 13:57, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Regional productions

message: If I recall correctly, the play isn't only set in the locker room.  There are scenes that occur on the baseball field, in Darren's apartment, in a restaurant, in an interrogation room (off the top of my head). I think the sentence that reads "the play takes place in a baseball locker room...etc." should be removed.HomelessRobles (talk) 02:10, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Setting
Talk:Virginia Beach – Norfolk – Newport News, VA–NC MSA

message: ::No My vote is no. I think that having the Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC MSA as a separate article is correct, mostly because it includes outlying areas which do not consider themselves part of Hampton Roads, nor does anyone else.
::I agree. I will remove the tag and add this to the metro areas category. Choalbaton 17:12, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I also agree. Vaoverland 19:07, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: YES Try going to the article of another other metro area in the country.  They all redirect to a less formal name (even in the state, Richmond, VA MSA redirects to Richmond-Petersburg).  This is the case with all major metros in the nation.  I don't buy the argument that they shouldn't be merged because Hampton Roads' "borders" may not exactly match the definition of the Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC MSA.  Go to any metro area in the country and you're bound to find people who associate themselves with the nearby region even though they are technically outside of the MSA.  Hampton Roads is a loosely defined term which certainly applies to all cities/counties in the MSA.  Additionally, Hampton Roads is the common name given to Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC MSA by nearly everyone and as such should be merged to align with all other MSA articles.--Conk 9 (talk) 22:17, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with Hampton Roads article

message: I wrote this in the Hampton Roads article but I'm also putting it here since the same image appears here. The map of Virgina and North Carolina shows the two states very inaccurately aligned (over 20 miles off at the western end of their border.) It's also missing the border between James City and Charles City and colors both red as if it's a single entity. James City is part of the Virginia Beach–Norfolk–Newport News, VA–NC MSA, but Charles City is part of a different MSA (Richmond, VA MSA) so that's kind of an important border that's screwed up there. rainfrog 11:55, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two Glaring Mistakes on the Map
Talk:Bush School of Government & Public Service

message: This page seems non-NPOV to me...  and some parts sound like they might be cut-and-paste.  But I'm probably not the most neutral person to try and fix it, so I'll leave it for someone else.  Bushytails 04:13, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: So, for anyone interested, I realized I have a conflict of interest after editing the page. I attended the school. I don't know if there's a way to keep the new info, because it is a lot of new information. It took me like 5 hours to research. I'm open to talking on how to make it less biased. Esylve (talk) 16:40, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Edits Suggested?
Talk:1848 United States presidential election

message: The name of the president has been changed from Zachary Taylor to Dan Rathers. 
Was not sure about what to do, so I hope I'm alerting the creator of this topic.
--Lrukieh 10:41, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed, see Wikipedia:Revert--The very model of a minor general 13:06, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism

message: The article contained a line speculating that Cass might have won the election if Martin Van Buren's third-party candidacy hadn't split the vote in New York.  This seems unlikely to me since the Democratic Party in those days was the more pro-slavery party, so Van Buren's anti-slavery votes probably would have broke more for the more anti-slavery Whigs, and in any case Taylor got 48% of the vote in New York and would have only needed a small piece of Van Buren's 26% there, while Cass, who only got 25% there, would have needed almost all of Van Buren's votes.  Thus I deleted that line from the article. Vidor (talk) 02:44, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Free Soilers and Democrats?

message: "Democrats countered by nominating Lewis Cass," According to the date on the party platforms on http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/platforms.php Democrats would have chosen there canidate first. So it wouldn't be a "counter"?
(Revo (talk) 05:56, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Minor issue

message: New Mexico was never actually under Texas control, even though it had a nearly equal population in 1846. If Texas had no organization or votes in New Mexico or anywhere near it, the whole area to the Rio Grande should not be shaded as Texas. El Paso was only joined to Texas in 1850 by Robert Neighbors. --JWB (talk) 12:57, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Mexico 

message: Should we use photographs for the lead images? This was when photography really started to take off, so I think we should use images that reflect that. Here are my proposals. Thoughts? The Image Editor (talk) 21:13, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Switching the lead images with photographs
Talk:Cy Coleman

message: Unified list of works? Zephyrprince 05:04, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The official SonyBMG Masterworks discography link for this artist is as follows
*Discography at SonyBMG Masterworks
It (in most cases) contains a full listing of in-print CDs released on the SonyBMG labels within the US (for the moment), along with track listings and in some cases audio clips (which will become more robust in the new year).  Ecommerce links are provided inobtrusively.
I have been informed that it creates a conflict of interest to post these links directly from my account, so please consider adding the page to the link section.  Thanks.
Softlord 23:01, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discography 
Talk:Sangli

message: Sambare Ganesh Sthapana 1899
  Made by wood
  height 13ft
  weight 1500kg  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.143.82.199 (talk) 07:34, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sambare Ganapati image 

message: It's Erode that's called Turmeric city. Some external references to confirm the fact:
http://www.healthdiaries.com/eatthis/10-facts-about-turmeric.html
http://buffernews.com/5109/turmeric-herbal-plant
http://buffernews.com/5109/turmeric-herbal-plant
http://www.onefivenine.com/india/Travel/Place/Karnataka/Erode
It says so in the article Erode.
Please answer to this discussion at Talk:Turmeric Gauravjuvekar (talk) 12:48, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disputed:Turmeric city 

message: This article is supposed to be about the city. So I am trying to remove items that are related to the district, which has its own separate article. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 00:53, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  City or District? 

message: Who is Siddharth WAghmode? No citation/reference is provided
I am not getting anything imp about this elsewhere also...
I think it is a mistake by 
someone . I think it should be deleted if irrelevent to Sangli page
please look seriously in this matter  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prasad.dandekar (talk • contribs) 08:59, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed that person and all of the other people who do not have articles, and changed the format from a table to a list. Each entry should have a brief description about why the person is notable, e.g. politician, sportsperson, etc. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 01:56, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who is Siddharth WAghmode? 

message: I have reverte to a "last best version" from yesterday. Please note WP:V, WP:RS, WP:VNT and WP:INDICSCRIPT, among other things, and please discuss any further changes here rather than edit warring into this article material that does not comply with our policies and guidelines. - Sitush (talk) 12:15, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert
Category talk:Planetary images

message: *Category was listed for renaming on February 6, 2005. No clear consensus.
===:Category:Planetary images → :Categroy:Solar planet images===
I probably should be bold and redo it, but we have a bot right? Move images in Planetary images to Solar planet images, or :Category:Solar system planetary images, because we will shortly be having extra-solar planetary images, and parent that cat under Planetary images. 132.205.15.43 06:12, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I would allege that you meant :Category:Solar planet images. RedWolf 06:31, Feb 6, 2005 (UTC)
*I'm unconvinced this move is needed. :Category:Planetary images should, ideally, have ten subcategories, one for each of the nine planets of our solar system, and one for extrasolar planets. Maybe eleven or twelve if you want asteroids and Kuiper Belt objects to be subcategories. The currently listed category would therefore be a parent category to categories for images from both our system and other systems.  Grutness|hello?  08:11, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: CFD Discussion - 2005

message: I probably should be bold and redo it, but we have a bot right? Move images in Planetary images to Solar planet images, or :Category:Solar system planetary images, because we will shortly be having extra-solar planetary images, and parent that cat under Planetary images. 132.205.15.43 06:12, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I would allege that you meant :Category:Solar planet images. RedWolf 06:31, Feb 6, 2005 (UTC)
*I'm unconvinced this move is needed. :Category:Planetary images should, ideally, have ten subcategories, one for each of the nine planets of our solar system, and one for extrasolar planets. Maybe eleven or twelve if you want asteroids and Kuiper Belt objects to be subcategories. The currently listed category would therefore be a parent category to categories for images from both our system and other systems.  Grutness|hello?  08:11, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [[:Category:Planetary images]] &rarr; [[:Categroy:Solar planet images]]

message: Even if this is empty at the time of nomination, lots of planetary images exist for proper use on WikiPedia, that do not qualify for Commons. Anything from ESA, for instance, like Mars Express images. 76.66.196.139 (talk) 05:59, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: CSD discussion - 2009
Talk:H. Reid

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Heidijane 16:00, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The quality assessment was shown as being a B-class article.  While there are many books listed as references, they lack page numbers.  Also there are no footnotes.  Because of this deficiency, I am adjusting the rating to C-class. Senator2029 ‖ Talk 15:27, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Geography of the Pitcairn Islands

message: Can't say I think the Map references with all zoom levels etc put directly into an article looks very suitable for an encyclopedia. -- Egil 06:30, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: They are more convenient than indirect links, and especially useful for people who are getting accustomed to the zoom levels, and for such an important thing as maps, the space used is not excessive.--Patrick 21:35, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  Sandy Island is below the sea for several years and could be removed from the main text. 82.224.88.52 (talk) 18:45, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Maps

message: Can we find more pictures? RJFJR (talk) 18:12, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Pictures
Talk:Cabtaxi number

message: there is something strange in Cabtaxi(1) :
:Cabtaxi(1) = 0 = 1^3 - 1^3 = 2^3 - 2^3 = 3^3 - 3^3  = 4^3 - 4^3 =  5^3 - 5^3 = ......
I think 0 =Cabtaxi(∞) ,right ?
User:211.76.97.246
:You're right.  says Cabtaxi(1) = 1, and I've made this change in the article. —Lowellian (reply) 05:07, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cabtaxi(1)