Talk:Accredited investor

message: I didn't see any mention in the article of why certain high-yield, high-risk investments are restricted to extremely wealthy organizations/individuals.  Also, why has the SEC decided to restrict the number of people eligible to invest in these types of things even further?  I think this kind of info would make the article more useful. 24.242.236.116 01:43, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That is true. In general, this article needs work. Feel free to pitch in.--Samiharris 22:18, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: How are accreditation requirements justified?

message: The articel says this rule was put into effect after the SEC act of 1933, but is this amount adjusted for inflation also? I am thinking it is, but just wanted to make sure.  --Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.219.88.140 (talk) 16:19, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question about the $200K/$1M Rule 

message: In Canada, the status of accredited investor is clearly defined in National Instrument 45-106 (NI 45-106) in Part 1.1 (j) to 1.1 (l), issued september 9, 2005. That might be a good source to add to the site for the quote on Canada, since i have no clue on how to do it.
At the same time i would like to talk about the status of eligible investor, there's no page on it, here are some sources.
US:"Minimum net worth requirements must be met by investors (in California) to be eligible to invest in Mortgage Funds operating subject to a Permit. These restrictions are intended to limit Mortgage Fund investment to more experienced investors. Additional restrictions limit the maximum percentage of an individual’s self-directed IRA that can be invested.
Eligibility: Net worth requirements (California) Either: • Annual gross income of $65,000 plus net worth of $250,000 (exclusive of home, furnishings and automobiles) or • Net worth of $500,000 (exclusive of home, furnishings and automobiles).
Mortgage funds operating pursuant to a Plan (described below) limit investor eligibility to California residents or to International residents. Residents of other states may not participate."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_money_investing
Canada:National Instrument 45-106 (NI 45-106) part 1.1 also but in Eligible Investor, sections(a)(i) to (a)(iii)
hope someone reads this and edits the page.
209.148.151.122 (talk) 05:30, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources for Canada 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Accredited investor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150302163223/http://www.lufranolaw.com:80/blog/-the-secs-accredited-investor-standard-is-long-overdue-for-an-overhaul to http://www.lufranolaw.com/blog/-the-secs-accredited-investor-standard-is-long-overdue-for-an-overhaul
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:11, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Accredited investor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.lufranolaw.com/blog/-the-secs-accredited-investor-standard-is-long-overdue-for-an-overhaul
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130124015621/http://www.bmfbovespa.com.br/rendafixa/pdf/Invest_Qualificado.pdf to http://www.bmfbovespa.com.br/rendafixa/pdf/Invest_Qualificado.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131219222134/http://www.edwardswildman.com/insights/PublicationDetail.aspx?publication=2661 to http://www.edwardswildman.com/insights/PublicationDetail.aspx?publication=2661
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:36, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Someone with expertise might want to comment more. It appears that under the FM conduct act (2013), the meaning of large is defined as 
Meaning of large
(1)A person is large if at least 1 of the following paragraphs applies:
(a)as at the last day of each of the 2 most recently completed financial years of the person before the relevant time, the net assets of the person and the entities controlled by the person exceeded $5 million:
(b)in each of the 2 most recently completed financial years of the person before the relevant time, the total consolidated turnover of the person and the entities controlled by the person exceeded $5 million.
(2)The frameworks and methodologies prescribed by the FMA under subpart 4 of Part 9 of this Act for the purposes of this clause (if any) must be complied with when determining whether either of the paragraphs of subclause (1) is satisfied.
The policy context is listed here within FAQ's. https://www.fma.govt.nz/compliance/offer-information/faqs/#schedule1offers
Fred114 22:15, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Situation in NZ has changed