lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Gazi Husrev Bey

message: Where should this page be?  At Gazi Husrev-beg or at Gazi-Husrev Beg?  The text of the article disagrees with the title. -- Graham  ☺ | Talk 15:25, 25 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: This para needs a serious re-write. In its present state it doesn't make much sense. Jodosma (talk) 01:09, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  The final para of Biography 

message: Was his father from the Sanjak of Bosnia or from the Sanjak of Herzegovina (when these in fact did not exist)? Was he or was he not a convert? Based on the fact that there was no Bosniak ethnic group at that time, and the facts represented — the designation of his father's origin should be clarified.--Zoupan 03:18, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: 1. You have not presented any facts. 2. Both of those two Bosnian administrative units existed at the time of his birth. His father, however, would have been born in the Kingdom of Bosnia or the semi-independent duchy of Herzegovina under the power of Bosnian nobleman Stjepan Vukcic Kosaca. 3. Herzegovinian Muslim = Bosnian Muslim = Bosniak. It denotes one and the same ethno-cultural group. Now, before and then. The fact that you as a Serb editor frequent articles not even slightly related to Serbs or Serbia hell-bent on undermining the existence of the ethnic group the Serbs antagonized in the recent war goes a long way to show your POV mind of state. I would raise the same warning flag if Bosniak or Croat editors were to start frequenting obscure Serb persona-related articles with edits that clearly question the Serbs as an ethnic group. Please note that you are playing at a dangerous precedent, since we all know the "Serb" nation was only formed in the 19th century, and referring to anyone as a "Serb" before this is the same kind of anachronism you voice your objection about here.The notion of ethnic groups changes over the centuries, and nations did not exist back then as they do now. Being a Serb, Croat or Bosnian/Bosniak then did not have the same connotations as it does today, and not just for Bosniaks (a name that stretches into the Middle Ages as Bosnjanin). Regardless, we do not apply Serb nationalist logics as to what Bosnia or the Bosniaks are and are not, or when they emerged or did not emerge. There is a Serbian language wikipedia for such purposes, where Bosniaks only emerged in 1993 out of thin air. As for his father being a convert, there is a reliable source invoked already. Feel free to verify it. Thank you and good bye. Praxis Icosahedron ϡ (TALK) 23:05, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bosnian 
Talk:Byron, New York

message: Hey all, I'm the WikiProject Cities assessor of this article. If feedback is what you want and need, come to my talk page and give me a holler! --Starstriker7(Dime algoor see my works) 19:27, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Here is the accident report for the 1919 train collision: https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/47957 WhisperToMe (talk) 22:59, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accident report for the 1919 train collision
Talk:Urs Meier

message: and disregarded the extra time announced by the assistant, making it five minutes instead of two - That just complete rubbish language wise. Under the laws of the game, it is the referee that decide on how long time added on to play. It is also the referee who signal to the fourth official how long to indicate to the crowd. So he's not disregarding the time the fourth official decided, cause it's his decision from the start. Now, whether there was any value reason(s) for him to add on extra time to which he orginally signaled to the fourth official is a different question. I've changed the language to be slightly less misleading. -- KTC 00:13, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Denmark-Romania 

message: The article seems to make pretty sweeping statements about the correctness of Meier's decision to disallow Campbell's 'goal' in this game. Clealry I'm a biased England fan, but I watched the replay again and Terry seems to be making a genuine attempt to go for the ball and Ricardo just falls over. Is it really just us English that think it wasn't that clear cut a decision? Hammer Raccoon 00:17, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Seeing as no one replied (and thus no one objected) I removed the POV regarding Meier's decision. Opinions in football are very subjective, and any interpretation of the 'correctness' of the decision would clearly be suspect to bias. Hammer Raccoon 10:05, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

text: Read Wikipedia: Avoid weasel words to see why this is a bad idea. Although I think the statement "television replays were inconclusive" is neutral as it is, a good solution would be to find a source stating this inconclusiveness (clearly not originating from England, Portugal or Switzerland). Hammer Raccoon 21:50, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  England vs Portugal 

message: I Do't know if this makes any difference, but He was one of the two Refs in FIFA 06BKLC11 (talk) 05:03, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  FIFA 06
Talk:Audio editing software

message: — Assignment last updated by Riddle2525 (talk) 01:33, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: This article is missing lots of history and can be improved in citations within the limitations section as there are little. --Adoobs (talk) 19:12, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Editing and Multimedia Production
Talk:John Macmurray

message: Confusing. Maxwellton is probably the one in Kirkcudbrightshire. Maxwelton might be near Dumfries, instead. Some sources seem to be double-l and imply the latter, though. Charles Matthews 19:42, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Place of birth

message: The text says (25 July 2013)'He was well known in Britain before World War II for his broadcasts on philosophy on the BBC Third Programme' but the Third Programme did not exist before the second World War (it began in 1946). It is true that he did a lot of broadcasting for the BBC before the Second World War (and during the war), some of it for overseas listeners. Whether he was 'well known' for these broadcasts is another matter. He might have been well known, but the simple fact of him broadcasting didn't necessarily make him well known.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.197.237.232 (talk) 10:24, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Broadcasting
Talk:Edgewood, Iowa

message: This town has got a great community with a superb school system. The townsfolk are friendly, good-natured people. Although i do not live in this town, I enjoy spending the majority of my time there. This is a great town to start a family. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 207.28.31.3 (talk) 18:57, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Family Town 
Talk:Sabrina Harman

message: the picture is not of Sabrina Harman. That's Megan Ambuhl  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.36.32.185 (talk) 22:17, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Did she spent the whole six months in prison?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.220.54.127 (talk) 17:35, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Imprisonment 

message: To add to article: information about her activities after 2004. 173.88.246.138 (talk) 23:44, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update
Talk:Barefoot skiing

message: Ok, there's a pic of a guy that not only barefoot skies but, jumps over a ramp? How's that possible? What about health? What if I decided I want to stop and just threw off the handle? What ya say? If someone knows more, better add. Undead Herle King (talk) 03:05, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Risks, biology and physics? 

message: After reading some sections of this article, it seems to lack the formal tone expected from an encyclopedia. Don't you think? --Taraborn 18:43, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formal tone 

message: How much faster than convential skiing  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.184.98.136 (talk) 18:06, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  How fast? 
Talk:Resistance Records

message: An RfC: Which descriptor, if any, can be added in front of Southern Poverty Law Center when referenced in other articles? has been posted at the Southern Poverty Law Center talk page. Your participation is welcomed. – MrX 17:14, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfC 
Talk:Pyrokinesis

message: Bias Tag: heavy sceptical bias Wakebrew (talk) 06:58, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: No bias, the critical tone of the article is supported by mainstream academic sources. Perhaps you should read up on Wikipedia policy of fringe ideas. 82.132.186.190 (talk) 22:28, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias Tag 

message: The article sourced to Gordon Stein and Joe Nickell reads "There is no conclusive evidence that pyrokinesis is a real phenomenon. Alleged cases are hoaxes, the result of trickery", this is accurate according to both sources. The lead had been previously changed indicating cases were "unexplained". Neither Stein or Nickell talk about "unexplained" cases in their books. 80.189.126.234 (talk) 09:34, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Lead

message: I don't know the exact etymology, but this section is completely incorrect.  I strongly believe (but do not have the book and movie to verify) that it was the MOVIE "Firestarter" (1984) that used the term Pyrokinesis; not the 1980 book, which used some other term (such as "pyrogenesis"?).
In either case, the term was in use previously:  "Pyrokinesis" (and "Cryokinesis") were used in TSR's Gamma World (1978)... I am looking at that source right now!  They were very likely used in the predecessor, Metamorphosis Alpha (1976), though I don't have it to hand.  I do not believe the terms originated with TSR.
Backing this up: It's used at least in 1973 in the book "Reference Guide to Fantastic Films Vol. 2," which seems to use it as if it were a term the reader should know. See https://archive.org/details/referenceguideto0002leew/ at 193, end of first entry in second column. No doubt King popularized the term, but it was not the first time it was used. I suggest altering or removing the etymology section to reflect this. NearNRiver (talk) 20:51, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology 

message: I'm not sure if that really belongs in the history section.  The sources are a sensationalist local media website and a talk show that likes paranormal stories.  It's a good example of such beliefs and anecdotes but appears to lack treatment by better sources.  Moreover, all are from 2011, even the additional ones I could find.  This suggests that some temporary superstitious noise occurred locally (for either an incident blamed on the girl or a show to attract attention) and it was over.  —PaleoNeonate – 03:41, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Philippines anecdote 

message: Similarly to with other fantasies like levitation, flying, teleportation and shapeshifting, putting objects on fire is possible during lucid dream experiences (including commonly called "out of body" or "astral" experiences).  In case someone knows of a decent source that does the link, it would deserve mention...  —PaleoNeonate – 01:30, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  In case
Talk:Froot Loops

message: Can anyone tell me why Froot Loops isn't sold in Europe because I'm from the UK, I've tried it and I like the cereal so why can't we have it? --Yuri Elite
:I know I have seen them in german supermarkets during the nineties, but have only bought them one time and didn't look for them thereafter, as I didn't really like them. However, german website lists them as one of their products but being unavailable. Probably has to do something with either the ingredients or maybe license issues. Don Cuan 19:55, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You can buy them in the precinct in Chester so they are available in the UK. Nicander (talk) 11:13, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

text: This is an encyclopedia: no editorialising. --Blurryman (talk) 19:34, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Not sold in Europe

message: I've reverted the edit that makes the claim that Froot Loops were at one point named "Fruit Loops" as I've discovered no outside sources supported this claim aside from Mandela Effect conspiracy theories. If the IP who added this would like to add it back to the article please do so with a reliable source and in a way that works with the flow of the article.
-08:27, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Froot Loops" previously named "Fruit Loops" 

message: It's probably hopeless to complain about this here, but it bugs me:  the so-called nutritional information is taken from the "cereal" box itself.  Its purpose is to obscure the actual content of the "food".   More useful would be actual content:  How much grain is in this concoction, how much sugar is added in production, etc.  These may be actually secrets held by the company, but (a) there will be approximations in reliable sources, and (b) that's no excuse for this sloppy repeating of company propaganda.--345Kai (talk) 19:17, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  info box
Talk:Universal Networking Language

message: So basically, with one UNL Wikipedia it becomes very easy to have Wikipedias in all languages that have a UNL converter... Guaka 19:27, 7 May 2005 (UTC)

message: :UNL can also mean Universidade Nova de Lisboa and University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
What's the point of this? "UNL" doesn't redirect to this page. It leads to a disambiguation page containing, among others, the Universidade Nova de Lisboa and the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, as well as the Universal Networking Language. 
I'm deleting this line. Fyrius (talk) 17:43, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  No disambiguation needed 

message: The article and references are about 2002, and many links not works.  --Krauss (talk) 11:56, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  ... And today? Is dead? RDF is used to replace it? 
Talk:Missoula, Montana

message: I noticed a discrepancy between the Missoula Metro Area population in the infobox and what is published in the 2020 census figures. Turns out that the metro area expanded after the 2020 census so that it now includes Mineral County. I changed the census population so that it is the actual figure recorded in 2020, but note that this will disagree slightly with the national ranking, because the 2020 figures in that article have been adjusted to include the 2020 population of Mineral County, although it was not part of the metro area in 2020. Tackling that issue is out of my pay grade. Ken Gallager (talk) 13:30, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Metro area population
Talk:Junk

message: Another slang definition for junk would be in reference to the groin area. I've heard it used as such:
"He got kicked right in the junk."
Just adding my share to the world's knowledge.
:Thanks for contributing. ;) - Tεxτurε 17:58, 25 Jun 2004 (UTC)

message: What about 'junk in the trunk', for fat/curvy women with big booties?
~ender 2007-12-25 22:23:PM MST
It's not a list of "junk" related slang; it's a disambiguation page to direct people to other articles. "Did you mean junk ships, or junk mail, or heroin, or...?" (Although "Junk in the trunk" does exist as a redirect. So...?) -- PaulxSA (talk) 16:37, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: More slang?

message: Was thinking of adding "rubbish", but not sure how I would implement it to this disambiguation page. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 08:02, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Junk = rubbish
Talk:MIL-STD-188

message: There are numbers missing in the list :165A, 220, 181B. Lincher 23:16, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You don't say? ;)  Added a list stub to make that evident.  If you know what the titles of the above are, feel free to add them.  --J Clear 02:42, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Numbers missing

message: I suspect that the deference between 125 and 125A is that 125A is a revison of the 125. I don't know if this is true but many of the # articles have the same title as the numberic-Alpha ones, so I really assume it is the case. Someone with more knowledge on this should confirm and a note should be included in the article if that's the case.--Wowaconia 20:37, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are the letters after the articles notes of revison. if so should this be noted? 
Talk:Battle of Kock (1939)

message: I have deleted two broken links and expanded "casualties" section in infobox. This important article needs solid rewrite. Good luck! 82.139.13.231 11:10, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Broken links, infobox expansion

message: The opening paragraph says the battle lasted from September 1-27 but the info boc says it was from October 2-6. Which one is it? Red4tribe (talk) 18:24, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The article was vandalized. This has been fixed. Thanks for the observation, --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  18:51, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Problems

message: Failed due to insufficient citations. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 21:51, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: B-class review

message: Although Polish forces fought valiantly and inflicted great damage to Germans, in the end entire unit (17000 men) surrendered. How this can be called victory? If sources used in the article write about "Polish tactical victory", then why not, but it should be referenced. It looks really weird otherwise. Pavlor (talk) 14:51, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Polish tactical victory?
Talk:Cyril Lowe

message: I can't quite figure out, either from the article or from the rugby site linked from it, exactly when Lowe's record was, and quite what it was a record for (18 trys in one game? one series?).  If we can clarify this, I think you've got a great "did you know" entry. -- Finlay McWalter |  Talk 20:11, 25 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 
Talk:Ahmadou Ahidjo

message: Nom du père, de la mère de amadou ahidjo 129.0.226.222 (talk) 19:30, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amadou ahidjo
Talk:Kronenberg

message: Kronenberg survived vfd. See: Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Kronenberg -- Wile E. Heresiarch 20:57, 25 Jun 2004 (UTC)

message: Well, I removed the repetition so it's an easily readable stub but the 'Kronenberg' disambiguation section really needs to be split off from the article itself, IMHO, if the article is to be expanded into something useful. Eddie.willers 04:27, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Now What?
Talk:Mihai Nadin

message: <courtesy blanking of talk page, let's start a new discussion as needed>--Jimbo Wales 20:02, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: There have been some problems with this article.  Please let's rebuild it with extreme attention to sourcing.--Jimbo Wales 20:03, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Farley

message: Should author and scientist Farley Mowat rate a mention, or only surnames? Jwrosenzweig 21:45, 25 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: sfaiac all uses of a word / phrase are 'fair game' where disambig pages are concerned. After adding your one from last year I did a quick WP search and, er, the list we already have somewhat *grew*! --Vamp:Willow 16:54, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Category talk:Shapeshifting

message: Why is Lycanthropy alphabetized under "C"?
--Jim Henry 22:10, 25 Jun 2004 (UTC)

message: Subcategories :Category:Fictional shapeshifters and :Category:Shapeshifting in fiction seem to be splitting hairs as well as being confusingly sounding similar. Maybe we should recombine these into this category (:Category:Shapeshifting) which seems to have growth potential.----Tokek 10:16, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Hm. I think it'd be better to subcategorize "fictional shapeshifters" under "shapeshifting in fiction", since fictional shapeshifters is specifically for articles about fictional characters whereas "shapeshifting in fiction" has articles about all kinds of other stuff. I don't think it's splitting hairs to separate out fictional characters from the works they appear in, for example. Bryan 05:28, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Still confusing is the part where the category for shapeshifting characters are put under the category for works (stories, books, etc.) that feature shapeshifting. Is a character a book? This also doesn't make sense.--Tokek 12:32, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This is an age-old problem that's dogged categories in general since they were implemented; do they represent an "is-a" relationship or do they represent a "has-a" relationship? (using object-oriented programming terminology there). The solution that Wikipedia seems to have settled on is that they can represent either, with only the context telling them apart. For example towns wind up in categories based on the counties they're in without actually being counties, which in turn are in country categories without themselves being countries. Down another branch you can find "music of" categories under country categories that contain articles on songs despite the fact that songs aren't countries either. Way back when categories were first implemented I tried to create a tagging scheme but there wasn't enough general interest in it to make it stick, unfortunately. Bryan 16:56, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger suggestion
Talk:George Reeves

message: A movie needs to be added.  George played the character Harold in the movie "The Strawberry Blonde" from 1941. 2603:9009:B0C:AA00:C4E2:F3A0:FDD8:2606 (talk) 03:48, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 20:01, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Movie addition 

message: I can’t edit this page, but I did see that he was posthumously credited for the Flash cameo, and then that edit was reverted. This is inconsistent. Other actors have been posthumously awarded credit on Wikipedia, such as on Peter Cushing’s page. Even if you decide to keep it reverted, I feel this should be mentioned somewhere. BaneEM (talk) 23:12, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not a cameo and shouldn't be credited as such since he's been dead for 60+ years. However, it can probably be mentioned in In popular culture. DonQuixote (talk) 23:42, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flash cameo. 

message: "Died by suicide" is not a euphemism. It is a neutral point of view way to describe the event.
"Committed suicide" is judgemental and so does not adhere to WP:NPOV.
I propose changing the wording back to "died by suicide".
RJ4 (talk) 01:43, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it has been a week since I raised this issue, and no-one has objected to the change,
so I shall go ahead and execute the change. RJ4 (talk) 01:57, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Suicide Wording
Talk:Ronald Hughes

message: Now that's a vague article... Jwrosenzweig 22:54, 25 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: 2004 comment

message: Removed "</i>Interestingly, both Adam Collins and Addy Parker thought it would be a great idea to dress up as "The Family" for Halloween, 2007. Unfortunately, Davey Parker has no such clever idea: he will go naked with lipstick scrawled on his body. We WILL play the white album. Peace out.</i>". Apparent vandalism from IP 24.60.184.239 Adonai-aus- 03:59, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 2007 comment

message: This is confusing: James and Lauren Willett were associated with Manson for a time and were later found dead.CharlesManson.com Noting that individuals named "James" and "Lauren" were involved in both incidents, Bugliosi speculated that Manson’s associates had killed the Willetts because they were actually Forsher and Elder (Hughes's friends)...  ...I mean, two people can not be two other people. If the Willetts were killed, how could the other man later try to sue the author? Did the author simply fail to ascertain that they were different people? Format (talk) 08:10, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It's all speculation that is explained (IMO) quite plainly in the section. To sum it up, Bugliosi was attempting to make a connection to the couple that knew Hughes (James Forsher and Lauren Elder) to another couple (the Elders) that were connected to Manson who ended up dead. They were all different people which is why it is presented as Bugliosi's speculation. Pinkadelica♣ 15:29, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Confusing