Template talk:Double image

message: Is this template redundant with ? The coin template also supports a header and footer above or below the images. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 16:31, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: What if we merge this two templates into one?. --SkyWalker (talk) 07:51, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template:Coin image box 2 singles 

message: There should be more space between the two images. — goethean ॐ 21:38, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  cell padding 

message: *two images shows the same alt= text. is it something about firefox or about the template? 81.214.175.53 (talk) 11:52, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  firefox problem 

message: Is there an autosize option? Snowman (talk) 12:16, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Not currently. If the images are different heights and you want to align them then you have to manually work out the required widths. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 13:32, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have only used the double image twice and both times I had images with edges the same proportions. A recommendation about the sizes could be written into the users guide when using an auto-size option. Snowman (talk) 13:58, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Autosize 

message: I've got two svg rendered images in one of these templates (at tensile testing) and most of the image is transparent so the background shows through. This has never been a problem when rendering them using the standard syntax ([[File:blah...), but with this template it supplies a gray background, which show through my transparent images and looks bad. Any way to make the background white like the rest of our images? Thanks! Wizard191 (talk) 12:22, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Can anyone help me with this? Wizard191 (talk) 00:54, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Background 

message: Using newest Firefox. When using textzoom the right image gets cropped on the right side. The surrounding div class="thumb tleft" is e.g. 136px but the next child is div style="width: 128px;" class="thumbinner" only 128px. Dont know where the 128px is coming from. This got nothing to do with the captions which won't fit anyway (this is normal and the case with all thumbs). 217.235.34.133 (talk) 01:40, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rendering error 

message: Until this template allows the thumbs to follow the user preferences, here is a workaround alternative using table markup.

	

The above wiki markup produces the following horizontal layout:
	
 -84user (talk) 22:03, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Table alternative to allow thumbs 

message: Is there an option to allow up-down positioning? One image directly above the other. --Anime Addict AA (talk) 17:55, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Use the superior  for that. – Adrignola talk 20:03, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Up-down? 

message: See this edit.  The template cannot handle it if only one image is present.  It would be preferable if it was coded to degrade gracefully, since the Commons Delinker will simply remove deleted images, and not fix this (and possibly the other multiple image) templates. The Rambling Man (talk) 09:40, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commons delinker causes template to corrupt 

message: Can someone come up with a similar template that presents two images on top of each other, rather than side-to-side?--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 07:42, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vertical images? 

message: Please place  on Template:Double image. As the template is up for deletion, that needs to be noted, as the notice that the page is up for deletion (which appears wherever the template is used) is the primary way in which effected parties become notified about the deletion nomination. Sven Manguard Wha? 21:41, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: ; I changed the page parameter accordingly. Don't forget you can use  instead of , which puts your request in a more appropriate category. I'm also changing the protection level to template editor (not that it matters if it gets deleted). —Darkwind (talk) 02:03, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Admin request 

message: These changes seem to have broken it . When I revert them a bit of the problem goes away such as on this page Wikipedia:WikiProject_Medicine/Popular_pages Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 22:55, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: In what way is it broken? --Redrose64 (talk) 23:53, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Certainly not displaying the images side-by-side at the moment (looking horrible on Firefox, vertically stacked images down the left-hand side of a larger box. Simon Burchell (talk) 18:54, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Which browser are you using, and what is the current zoom level? --Redrose64 (talk) 22:38, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

text: Could be the zoom - I'm using Firefox on my laptop now and it looks fine. On the other hand, it always looked fine on Firefox on my PC until today, and I haven't changed the settings... Simon Burchell (talk) 22:40, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Whatever it was, it's fixed now - looks okay, whatever computer I'm using. Thanks, Simon Burchell (talk) 09:48, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Broken

message: Please add the following wikitext to  at top of Template:Double image: 
:|note=See TfD discussion.
--Lexein (talk) 05:07, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  Already done by Codename Lisa. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 06:39, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit request

message: Supposedly Template:double image is deprecated. Unfortunately the new Template:Multiple image is not supported across all languages of Wikipedia. Until it is I am not supportive of medical articles switching over to multiimage as it will interfere with my work here Wikipedia:WikiProject_Medicine/Translation_task_force Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 14:42, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: You posted a similar thread on at least two other pages: please see WP:MULTI. I have replied at Template talk:Multiple image/Archive 1#Double image versus multiple image. --Redrose64 (talk) 15:29, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Double image versus multi image