Talk:Michelle McCool

message: Michelle mccool still uses MADT ankle lock
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3mJsznazE38  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.142.172.225 (talk) 14:30, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You cant use youtube as a source that a move still in use find a better source before you make the changes.
yet its prrof that someone used a certain move?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.142.172.225 (talk) 16:43, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  MADT 

message: Someone put that she "slept her way to the top." please remove this.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.240.184.10 (talk) 01:09, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Personal Life

message: Okay so this is my first time sing Wiki so bare with me if I done something wrong. I noticed an error on this page of Michelle McCool. On the first paragraph and somewhere in her Lay-Cool history, you have said she was announced and is a Co-Womans Champion. This information is false as she is only announced as a 'Self-Professed' Co-Womens Champion. Officially, Layla is the ONLY WWE Womens Champion and McCool is not an official holder of the belt.
Heres the source that proves that as a fact: http://www.sescoops.com/wrestling-news/wwe-news/melina-injury-update-update-on-the-wwe-womens-title/
RadicalRhys297 (talk) 08:45, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: *  Done This seems to be the case. I have made this edit. -- Matthew Glennon (T/C\D) 13:26, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request from RadicalRhys297, 24 May 2010 

message: Is there some way we can incorporate the footnote in the page better? It seems weird probably because it is the only one.If not, no big deal. Also, there is an article that states that she graduated from the University of North Florida and not Florida State University.Just thought I'd bring it up. Here's a link to the article . This could be a typo but it's worth taking a look at. (MgTurtle (talk) 02:30, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Footnote/University 

message: It seems that laycool act like faces in NXT, kind of how michael cole acted like a heel (then became heel) i was wondering if this is worth mentioning?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.71.188.18 (talk) 01:04, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  NXT faces 

message: Come on, If you watch any Michelle McCool match; she finishs most matches w/ it!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.107.9.245 (talk) 21:48, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  big boot finisher. 

message: Michelle is now the first ever WWE Unified Tag Team Champion, which she won at Night of Champions by defeating Melina.
GovindBharat (talk) 23:37, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Thanks, Stickee (talk) 00:09, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request from GovindBharat, 22 September 2010 

message: She has confirmed it via her Twitter account that her birthday is October 6, 1970. This would make her 40 not 30. My source is her verfied Twitter account. http://twitter.com/mccoolmichellel  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.221.204.189 (talk) 14:26, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Michelle's actual birthday  

message: How come on Layla El's wikipedia page, it says she uses "Diamond Dust" as a finisher yet she's only used this move once also Michelle McCool's wikipedia profile doesn't mention "Big Boot" as her finisher at all!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.107.15.51 (talk) 16:09, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Finishers. 

message: Michelle McCool uses 'Big Boot' as a finisher, Cmon!?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.107.18.125 (talk) 20:11, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Big Boot 

message: Michelle McCool is apparently taking time off from WWE, She hasn't been Released--If she had been Released it'd be announce on WWE.com and she wouldn't be wrestling on Sunday, Remember guys--'Loser leaves WWE' is kayfabe!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.25.173.139 (talk) 22:13, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "LayCool Split, Feud with Layla, and Possible Release" 

message: This is kind of a wierd bit at the start of the article, where it says she's a retired professional wrestler mostly known for her time with the wwe. I know this is the stnadard way to phrase things in these articles but It's not right in this case. Michelle Mccool never worked the independant wrestlnig scene, and never worked for any other wrestling company, she's only known for her time with the wwe, not mostly. Right?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.147.161.19 (talk) 19:21, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It says that because she has appeared on several other TV shows, as noted in the 'Other Media' section, but she is obviously best known for her appearances in the WWE. -- Fyrefly  (talk) 21:24, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mostly Known For Her Time With The WWE 

message: Apparently a post McCool made on Twitter is sparking one particular user to speculate on her return to WWE and consistently add it to the article with no legitimate citation of any sort, besides a mention of Twitter. McCool's post makes absolutely no mention of returning to the WWE. In fact, the word return does not even appear in the post. The post seems more to do with McCool getting back in shape after four months away from the ring. Even if the speculation was founded, it's still just speculation and doesn't belong in the article. Please refrain from adding this unfounded information. It is blatant abuse of WP:ALIVE. NJZombie (talk) 02:00, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Return speculation

message: :: I need your guys input on something on Michelle McCool's page. Should she be listed as her being married to Mark Calaway or The Undertaker. My take is she is married to the person not the character and it could put off the wrong image to people that their marriage is scripted and not real. There is an IP User_talk:96.254.48.155 who seems to think it should be The Undertaker and I have reverted it back twice as good faith edits as it since I started on here has been Mark Calaway. I have explained this to them on their talk page as well and informed them to come here if they want to get a consensus to change it and not get into an edit war about it. Your inputs would be appreciated.
Chris "WarMachineWildThing" (talk) 01:27, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Last I knew we were using WP:COMMONNAME in infoboxes, so The Undertaker would be correct in this case.LM2000 (talk) 01:53, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

text: Alrighty then could you please revert it then, I'm already at 2 reverts not about to do 3 even on myself. I am wrong I am wrong. 
Chris "WarMachineWildThing" (talk) 02:04, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

text: You're fine.  Self-reverting doesn't count as WP:3RR.LM2000 (talk) 02:34, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: *Yeah it's okay. We list Taker because more people know the ring name than real name. It is about recognizability starship.paint ~ KO 10:56, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which name should be there? 

message: Do we have a specific rule/guideline for this infobox parameter? Should we always use real names? --Wario-Man (talk) 07:53, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spouse: Ring name vs. Real name 

message: She has 2 children (a son named Kolt, in addition to her daughter) who was shown on Mark Calaway’s WWE Hall of Fame induction 143.159.168.191 (talk) 08:51, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 08:54, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 10 April 2022