lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:CNC wood router

message: * CNC Router EZ-Router.com is a good resource on CNC Routers
**It's a commericial link which can not be used on Wikipedia. --Doug Coldwell talk 22:13, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

message: CNC wood router page has to merge with CNC Router ;because CNC wood router is sub category of CNC Router
other sub categories for CNC Router are:
CNC Stone Router
CNC Plastic Router
CNC Wood Router
CNC Router for aerospace applications
CNC Router for Signage applications
etc....
So the CNC Wood Router has to merge with CNC Router not CNC Router with CNC wood Router  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.22.241.233 (talk) 11:40, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: How about that the article CNC wood router (started October 2004) be renamed to CNC router and CNC Router (started 11 April 2009) be deleted since there are so many issues with that article. Any good material from CNC Router could then be merged into the new article CNC router. There would then just be minor edits to the new CNC router to correct it to just that pertaining to a "CNC router" with information that there are also a:
*CNC wood router
*CNC stone router
*CNC plastic router
*CNC router for aerospace applications
*CNC router for signage applications
*CNC router for other applications
Sound better? --Doug Coldwell talk 14:56, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Bombinatoridae

message: At least one species of bombinatoridae is notable in possessing no vocal sac, see that article. Is this a characteristic of the entire genus (as I am tempted to guess), or just of this one species? Andrewa 19:48, 3 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The fire-bellied toad page seems to refer solely to Bombina, not to the whole of Bombinatoridae. -- Beardo 11:07, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bombina 

message: I own a fire bellied toad, they are NOT highly toxic. I mean.. you don't want to touch one and then rub your eyes but they aren't nearly as toxic
as toxic as a poison dart frog, which is what that sentence makes them out to be.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.159.193.94 (talk) 14:03, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "Highly Toxic"
Talk:Animanga

message: Animanga was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made below the archived discussion rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was KEEP
A dicdef for a neologism. Cool! (I'm willing to accept that perhaps this just needs cleanup, but to me it seems a rather low-grade neologism created by squishing two words together.) Ashibaka ✎ 19:55, 3 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: VfD of 3 Nov 2004
Talk:Flemish Parliament

message: hello, the colours of the legend don't match to the colours of the diagram.  --142.163.195.253 (talk) 18:45, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  structure of parliament diagram 

message: Could someone clarify "(unlike the French Community and Wallonia, which each have separate legislatures: the Parliament of the French Community and the Parliament of Wallonia)." I am trying to translate this but the three do seem very similar. How are they unlike? Is this parliament not a separate one even though it has legislative power over a part of the country (and apparently parts of Brussels under certain circumstances)? Pure Evil (talk) 02:27, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Differences
Talk:Irreligion

message: I've made some fixes to the demographics list, but it's still not in great shape. The List of countries by irreligion is better, as it shows multiple sources. I suggest merging this list into that one, to avoid a WP:REDUNDANTFORK. See discussion at . --IamNotU (talk) 11:12, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I replaced the table with an excerpt from List of countries by irreligion, which follows a better methodology. Discussion about wheter some content from the old list is worth keeeping is better suited for Talk:List of countries by irreligion, unless someone actually thinks having two different tables is a good idea. Personuser (talk) 14:42, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge the list to "List of countries by irreligion" 

message: Why is this article part of WikiProject: Atheism if the article itself testifies that irreligion and atheism are not the same? Primal Groudon (talk) 01:32, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Atheism is the most prominent type of irreligion based on the objection to the gods. Erkin Alp Güney 07:34, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikiprojects 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Secular world and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at  until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Steel1943 (talk) 19:41, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Secular world" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: Sources (including the encyclopedia cited in the first sentence, when quoted properly) distinguish irreligion as an active rejection, not just absence of religion. The whole article seems as it is now seems to be based mainly on editors' opinions of what irreligion is. To quote  the source originally cited (incorrectly) in the article and the OED:
Irreligion is the active rejection of religion in general, or any of its more specific organized forms, as distinct from absence of religion. The Oxford English dictionary defines it as want of religion; hostility to or disregard of religious principles; irreligious conduct.
Best wishes, Pol098 (talk) 20:07, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I think we also need to add back indifference though because the Encyclopedia you mentioned, does mention it. "Irreligion is a reaction or alternative response to established religion. More specifically, irreligion is those beliefs and actions that are expressive of attitudes of hostility or indifference toward prevailing religion, together with indications of the rejection of its demands." Ramos1990 (talk) 01:26, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Irreligion isn't the same as absence of religion
Talk:M4a

message: "Using the more general extension mp4 in these files is not recommended, unless it is the only way for the software to recognize the files."
That is not the more general extension, it is the official extension. I guess there's some discussion about m4a, some people like it (distinct between video and audio files more easily) some don't (not all software supports it). I made the explanation a bit clearer without giving any judgement on what extension is better to use.
I don't think this should redirect to the MP4 page. "M4A" is commonly used as an abbreviation for "Medicare For All".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deepfryer99 (talk • contribs) 01:35, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
Talk:Horst aan de Maas

message: Horst aan de maas is not a real place
it should be Horst
Horst isn't really attached to the maas, so it's fake
And besides that the government in Horst is mean, they chose to have a floriade instead of giving money for the education
:It is the official municipal name. CRwikiCA (talk) 18:41, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Statement about fakeness
Talk:Henry J. Kaiser

message: What does this section mean? What is the "idea"? What was implemented?
"At Kaiser Shipyards in Richmond, California, Kaiser implemented the pioneering idea of Dr. Sidney Garfield of Kaiser Permanente."
69.122.194.171 (talk) 17:33, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Presumably this was Garfield's scheme to build hospitals and provide medical insurance to deal with industrial injuries of workers.  I'm not sure it is appropriate to describe this as revolutionary.  Examples of such schemes can be found during the era of canal construction in England, where numnerous injuries and deaths were always expected.  Also on 19th century American railroad construction and operation.  Both examples predate the 1930s by a long way. See railway surgery for some details on both railways and canals. SpinningSpark 10:04, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unclear section
Talk:Mr. Monopoly

message: Where has mr monopoly’s eye monocle gone? 62.232.252.89 (talk) 18:46, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: His monocole was never part of the original sketch. It's just that people kept imagining the presence of one which was later added. But the original doesn't have a monocle. 49.204.112.34 (talk) 14:56, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eye monocle
Talk:Momo (novel)

message: Shouldn't this mention the MOMO brand of steering wheels & car accessories? Cctoide
:I don't think so. Is there anything about MOMO brand car accessories that makes them more noteworthy than any other brand of car accessory? --Paul A 02:52, 4 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I suppose, but even "car accessories" doesn't have its own page :-/ And there's still the Momo character in Syberia ;-) - Cctoide
The plot summary states that Momo lives in an unnamed Italian city. The cultural impression and the names of the characters may remind one of Italy, but nevertheless there is no explicit reference to Italy in the novel. Shouldn´t the word "Italian" be removed of the plot summary? - 88.72.227.32 (talk) 14:10, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Priority

message: A number of enties were removed for disambiguation cleanup.  Please note that a disambig page is primarily for the purpose of directing incoming links and readers to other pages which hold actual content.  Disambig pages are generally not for encyclopedic content itself, so extensive dicdefs should be avoided (or moved to wiktionary, or whatnot).  If it's very likely that a future page will be created for something like priority (intellectual property), then by all means, go ahead and include the redlink.  In general, please be familiar with WP:MOSDAB.  --Interiot 16:03, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup
Talk:Mausoleum of Galla Placidia

message: I know when it was built, and I see very good and concise information in the "Old talk" section above. Why hasn't THAT been used?
It's unfathomable why anyone would leave out the most important piece of information concerning a building.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.61.33.138 (talk) 18:12, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Because it's completely unreferenced.  -- Elphion (talk) 18:53, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: The article contains no date of construction!

message: The UNESCO experts describe it as "the earliest and best preserved of all mosaic monuments, and at the same time one of the most artistically perfect". [citation needed]
This sentence does not exist in the UNESCO citation given. It has sat unsourced since 10:08, 22 February 2006: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mausoleum_of_Galla_Placidia&direction=next&oldid=34005456  — Preceding unsigned comment added by GPinkerton (talk • contribs)  
: There are many places where that sentence does not exist, but the edit summary for that 14 year old edit clearly sources it to the International Council on Monuments and Sites (ICOMOS) advisory body evaluation performed when the "Early Christian Monuments of Ravenna" were designated as a World Heritage Site in 1996.  Back then, editors were not so keen as nowadays on the thin veneer of respectability presented by a smattering of superscript footnotes.   It was the work of mere seconds to locate the source on the UNESCO website at https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/788/documents/ or more specifically here (top of the second page, which is numbered 59, if you are still struggling to find it).   You might have received a quicker response if you had tried to elicit the source from the original editor, Ghirlandajo, who is still editing from time to time.   I see you've been editing for at least two years, and I trust you already know how to sign your posts on a talk page, so please excuse me reminding you to add four tildes ( that is ~~~~ ) to add your user name and a timestamp.  Happy editing. Theramin (talk) 02:14, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  Is that what you call on display in my local planning department? I did look through it before but I must have missed it. I was especially dubious because, while perfect, it certainly isn't "the earliest of all mosaic monuments" by a good many centuries. I'm not keen to add it back in for this reason, but thank you for finding it. GPinkerton (talk) 23:55, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsourced quotation, allegedly from UNESCO
Talk:Giovanni Battista Riccioli

message: The article on Mizar (star)  implies that Castelli noted that Mizar was an apparent double star before Galileo did.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.148.128.76 (talk) 15:42, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mizar 

message: The present text of the intro states that on a rotating earth 'the ground moves at different speeds at different times'.  I don't know what the author of this intended to mean, but it appears to be untrue and inconsistent with the main text.  This correctly states that the ground would move at different speeds at different *latitudes*, not times. I have not amended it myself, because I am no expert and maybe the author had some other point in mind that has not occurred to me.109.150.7.219 (talk) 14:33, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last sentence of intro
Talk:Shipping Forecast

message: On the Simon Mayo show today on Radio 2 a Met Office spokesman said that many other countries have a shipping forecast.  The UK's version that is the subject of this article was the first and perhaps the most famous.  But is it too UK-centric to make no reference to the others? Should the article start something like: "A shipping forecast is a [insert explanation].  The first and most famous is the one used in the UK [insert cite] but they exist in many other countries throughout the world [insert cite]."  Peteinterpol (talk) 17:34, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I would question whether it is called a shipping forecast anywhere else? I think marine forecast seems to be the more common term elsewhere (Japan, Canada, Australia ). I think a better way to handle it would be to use a hatnote of some sort that links to Marine_weather_forecasting#Responsible_organizations_and_their_areas. Derek Andrews (talk) 00:21, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: France used to have les prévisions par zones or colloquially la météo marine on France-Inter to which anyone could listen in long wave (1829 m wavelength). It covered more or less the same zones as the BBC shipping forecast, but it has been discontinued on France-Inter (which is not broadcast in long wave anymore) and nowadays, if it is broadcast, it is only on a channel to which only marine radios can tune. — Tonymec (talk) 21:02, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other countries' shipping forecasts 

message: This article could mention that the Shipping forecast is broadcast before the Six O'Clock News on BBC Radio Four on Sundays. Vorbee (talk) 16:59, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Shipping forecast on Sundays

message: Does anyone have a list of the shipping forecast areas in 1952, please? I've tried to work it out by looking at merges, additions and renaming but not sure if I'm right! Thanks very much! Locoimloco (talk) 15:22, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  1950's shipping forecast 

message: It appears from the Radio 4 schedules that the BBC has gone back to broadcasting four forecasts a day today.  The early morning one is still at 0533 (rather than the old time of 0520) but the midday one has reverted to 1201 on long wave only, and the early evening one at 1754 on long wave only has returned. GDBarry (talk) 13:31, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fourth forecast reinstated
Talk:Unofficial mottos of Poland

message: Does anyone else agree that a better translation of "Ojczyzna" is "Fatherland" and not "Homeland"?
:Simple translating Ojczyzna to Fatherland would be calquish. Polish Ojczyzna have different conotations that English Fatherland, thus Homeland is better translation. Ojczyzna does not have nationalistic associations which belongs to Fatherland. Przepla 21:23, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: IMO any will do, as long as we prepare a footnote explaining that the term might have some special meaning lost in translation. Though I agree with Logologist that country seems the most neutral here (yet far from being an exact equivalent). Halibutt 02:56, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Homeland]] or [[Fatherland]]?

message: Isn't "national mottos of Poland" redundant?  Perhaps the article should be moved to simply Unofficial mottos of Poland? Appleseed 02:25, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Concur.  The briefer, the better.  logologist 02:51, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title 

message: In polish first person is allowed to be in front like I and Joe while in english it should be Joe and I. So shoudn't Za wolność Waszą i Naszą be translated as For Yours and Our freedom? --Uzytkownik (talk) 05:54, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation
Talk:Bytom

message: I think much more can be said concerning the city's symbols (flag and coat of arms) then just describing them.  Maybe somebody more familiar with the art and science of these symbols can expand upon this section.  James084 02:52, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Symbols 

message: Failed for WP:POLAND due to insufficient references and poor coverage of many topics (many sections are barely more than lists). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:11, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: B-class review

message: Bytom is 26.81 sq mi, not 2,681 sq mi like the page says. This will be very confusing.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.193.153.230 (talk) 22:08, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should I change this?
Category talk:Sailing rigs and rigging

message: Some examples of articles that do not belong in this category:
*Mirror (dinghy), and all other descriptions of particular classes (as opposed to rigs).
*Bermuda sloop. The details of interest to this project are covered instead in bermuda rig.
Feel free to add to this list! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrewa (talk • contribs) 21:30, November 5, 2004 
: How about lines, such as halyard and Sheet (sailing)? — Sebastian 20:51, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some counterexamples 

message: The following diagram is, I think, usefull for explaining some of the differences in sailing rigs on two masted vessels: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ship_Rigging_differences_in_schematic_view.png 82.169.56.115 (talk) 16:50, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Usefull schematics for explaining sailing rigs 

message: "William Bell, No. 24" has ze-ro relationship to the topic of Sailing rigs and rigging. SteveO1951 (talk) 21:40, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delete "William Bell, No. 24" as an item in this listing.
Talk:Naval Battle of Hakodate

message: "The naval forces of the Hakodate Republic were grouped around the Kaiten. The"
Kaiten here links to what appear to be WWII vintage suicide torpedoes. This seems an unlikely
relationship. I presume this has been mis linked, but I have no information to correct it.
Shokaman
:Article on the Japanese warship Kaiten coming up soon. PHG 12:58, 4 Nov 2004 (UTC)

message: The order of battle contradicts with jawp article. Needs further research.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.176.203.246 (talk) 05:57, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Order of battle dubious
Talk:Senate of Puerto Rico

message: Is the results table for the Senate accurate?  It shows the PNP winning all 16 district seats, despite outpolling the PPD by a margin of only 0.3%.  Is that correct?  I know first-past-the-post elections do produce electoral distortions (my own country used that system in the past), but I've never known of a party with 48 percent to the vote to get 100 percent of the seats.  Can anybody explain?  David Cannon (talk) 22:47, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes they are accurate.  Since the district Senate seats are not state wide offices, they win with the votes of their respective districts.  However this is not the entire senate as there are also at-large seats, 11, out of which 6 went to the PNP and the remaining 5 to the PPD.  While on a state wide level they appear to have a small margin, on each district the PNP candidates got a majority of the votes.Republikaner (talk) 16:14, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

text: Republikaner, don't you mean plurality?  With only 0.3% of the vote more, I don't think they could have gotten a majority in any district, mathematically.  Maybe one or two.  It must have been a razor thin finish in each and every district.  It's a bizarre result, the likes of which I've never seen before.  The at-large seats, which are much more proportional, were distributed almost evenly.74.240.51.161 (talk) 04:50, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  2008 Election 

message: The article lists the 8 districts (San Juan, Bayamón, Arecibo, Mayagüez-Aguadilla, Ponce, Guayama, Humacao, Carolina), but wikilinks are to articles of some of the 78 Municipalities of Puerto Rico or cities having those names, not to articles defining the 8 districts, which are different.  I find the districts are defined within the Puerto Rico constitution, but it's not simple, as some of the municipalities are split across districts.  (The Puerto Rico constitution PDF document is linked from top of the Puerto Rico Senate webpage and this is a direct link to the PDF ).  Could anyone create articles about each of the eight districts?  And, it would be very helpful to find/create a map of the country divided by these. doncram (talk) 21:38, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  definition of the 8 districts, and map needed 

message: I think it might be helpful to eventually divide the article. For example, the information about the Presidents of the Senate could go to its own article listing the duties of the President and whatnot, while the current members could go to another article like this one, this one, or this one. Also, the list of former Sentors is bound to get longer and longer, if everyone adds every single senator there has ever been, since there is currently no criteria for who is in it. Thief12 (talk) 23:12, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dividing the article