Talk:XX male syndrome

message: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/dispomim.cgi?id=278850
They should test MTF transgender people and see if they have XX male syndrome. That would explain quite a bit.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.230.234.79 (talk) 03:32, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Not withstanding that many MTFs are masculine enough to be somewhat noticable without facial surgery, figure-disguising clothes, training in altered movements/mannerisms/speech etc? 193.63.174.10 (talk) 10:36, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Many are and many aren’t.  — Chameleon 10:25, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  OMIM description of the syndrome 

message: Reading this made me wonder if one of the X chromosomes is randomly deactivated in each cell, as in XX females.
130.71.254.49 (talk) 07:55, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: X-inactivation?

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on XX male syndrome. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20091012041318/http://www.healthline.com:80/galecontent/xx-male-syndrome to http://www.healthline.com/galecontent/xx-male-syndrome
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:12, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I have been looking this article over and have some additions and changes I'd like to make. I'd like to expand on how the two X chromosomes work and explore if duplicate X genes are inactivated, describe how sexual differentiation occurs with respect to this syndrome, explain how it effects puberty, expand on the presentation section to give a more detailed overview, differentiate between XX male syndrome SRY-positive and SRY-negative, and
fix the citations because it is word-for-word from an article. I also think additional methods could be added for XX Male Syndrome detection.  
 
This is a list of relevant articles that will be useful in making the above changes:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3890225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3890225/
http://cms.galenos.com.tr/FileIssue/8/238/article/46-48-eng.pdf
http://www.jfma-online.com/article/S0929-6646(12)00175-1/fulltext
Tbechar (talk) 02:14, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing this Article for Class 

message: I think the lead section is done incredibly well. It is succinct and give the reader a clear picture of what XX male syndrome is without being overwhelming with detail. The lead is great if you're looking for general information on the subject.
Each section is well thought out and organized. I felt that when I was reading the article, whenever a question arose, the article did a good job of explaining the material and answered my questions. I think that it would be good to add more information (if there is any) into the Xg gene section in order to make it more clear. The structure of the diagnosis section is written well and is very clear.
Overall very clear and well written!
143.109.169.30 (talk) 03:11, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Emma Hall's Peer Review 

message: I think the lead section is done incredibly well. It is succinct and give the reader a clear picture of what XX male syndrome is without being overwhelming with detail. The lead is great if you're looking for general information on the subject. Each section is well thought out and organized. I felt that when I was reading the article, whenever a question arose, the article did a good job of explaining the material and answered my questions. I think that it would be good to add more information (if there is any) into the Xg gene section in order to make it more clear. The structure of the diagnosis section is written well and is very clear.
Overall very clear and well written!
Halleripon (talk) 03:12, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Emma Hall's Peer Review 

message: Lead Section: 
First two paragraphs are a great synopsis of the article and give clear introduction into your topic. I think you did a great job with the lead section! 
I do not understand why the final sentence is included and it is not cited, so it needs to be important to the whole article and cited appropriately or I would remove it. 
Clear Structure: 
The organization works well for the article. It is easy to follow and separated well. The sections are also separated into logical sub-headings that help the reader identify where information will be. 
Balanced Coverage: 
I do not think there is any section that is lacking information. There is good coverage in each section with sources to support the information.  The only section where I could see adding some information would be about the types of treatment (describe each in more depth, examples from the symptoms?). 
Neutral Content:
There does not appear to be any bias in the article. The information is presented in a clear way without being persuasive. 
Reliable Sources:
All of the sources appear to be peer reviewed journals. Quite a few are reviews, but there are some case studies, which are less useful for Wikipedia. However, because the disorder is rare, I think it is acceptable to use these sources. 
Big Picture:
You did a great job with the organization of this article. My main suggestion would be to balance out the treatment section with examples. Otherwise, the article reads well and is a great resource. 
Kking1110 (talk) 03:28, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Katie's Peer Review 

message: I feel that the lead section does a very good job of summarizing your article. Make sure that you include a citation for the last statement, although it feels like a very sudden change in topic and does not have much of an explanation
The overall structure of your article flows well and is organized in an efficient manner that allows your readers to easily find any specific information they are looking for on the topic. The use of different subject headers is nice as it helps to break up the information better.
All content takes a neutral tone, which is good.
There are several sections that I feel lack adequate amounts of sources, such as "SRY-positive" and "Treatment". Aside from that, your sources look good and seem to come from reliable journals/places.
I feel that your article is very well written, you may want to look at further explaining those sections where you have provided less information and sources to really get the idea across about XX Male Syndrome. Again, I really liked the use of subject headers to clearly organize the information. I feel that the most important thing that you can work on would be to bring in more sources and provide more of an explanation of the images embedded on the page.
Callystahansen (talk) 14:15, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Callysta's Peer Review 

message: *Support 2019 merge proposal to merge 46,XX testicular disorders of sex development; a synonym best merged to the longer-standing article. Any differences between the synonyms can be discussed on one page. Klbrain (talk) 17:25, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Will alert WP:Med to this. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 04:17, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

text: Klbrain (talk) 16:26, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5312213/ CycoMa (talk) 01:09, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I read the article, and it seems to indicate that none of the XX males in the study were able to produce sperm. FeygeleGoy/פֿײגעלע גױ‎ (talk) 00:05, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conformed cases of sperm in XX males. 

message: currently used image [with a caption 'An example of translocation between two chromosomes'] is a hugely misleading one —it appears to show an X chromosome with what is seemed to be a kinda Y chromosome (at least me, not being a biologist, was confused by this resemblance). so it appears to be genuinely illustrating a subject of "translocation of SRY gene between X and Y chromosomes" but it does not!
here is the file https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Translocation_of_chromosomes_(close-up)_illustration.jpg
and its description says:
"An illustration of the translocation of chromosomes, a mechanism that causes some cancers.
[Source] National Cancer Institute"
caption to an image in article https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/SRY says "In humans, the SRY gene is located on short (p) arm of the Y chromosome at position 11.2".
could be better image for this specific subject [SRY gene translocation] found? if not then maybe it would be better to remove a misleading one? (i guess a link to an article explaining 'Translocation'  is completely enough) 92.51.5.203 (talk) 17:45, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  a request to change the image for "SRY positive" section 

message: Q103.242.22.225
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/103.242.22.225 103.242.22.225 (talk) 07:47, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amit roy