lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Berhtwald

message: 2nd paragraph from top:
<BR>
"Berhtwald's period as archbishop coincided with the end of Wilfrid's long struggle to regain the Archbishopric of York..."
<BR>
Shouldn't it be "Bishopric of York"? The first archbishop was Wilfred's successor, Ecgberht, when York was elevated in 735.
Norman Zavlandid (talk) 18:57, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: You are indeed correct, and it's now been corrected, thank you! Ealdgyth - Talk 19:09, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Berhtwald 

message: While ferreting for yet more stuff on the ecclesiastical history of Reculver, I stumbled upon this from 1946 by Gordon Ward, in which the idea that Berhtwald had once been abbot at Glastonbury is explicitly rejected (p. 26): no detailed argument is presented, but Ward effectively pins the blame on Searle's Onomasticon. Thing is, looking at Bede, Nicholas Brooks's work on Canterbury, a paper by Susan Kelly on the Reculver charters ("Reculver Minster and its early charters", in Barrow & Wareham (eds.), Myth, Rulership, Church and Charters Essays in Honour of Nicholas Brooks, 2008) and the Blackwell encyclopedia, I find no mention of Glastonbury in relation to this Berhtwald – Glastonbury isn't even in the index for the edition of Bede that's cited for this article. But looking at the PASE, I see it has "Beorhtwald 5" as abbot of Glastonbury early in the 8th century and within the period that the present Berhtwald (as "Beorhtwald 6") was firmly ensconced at Canterbury. Do you think Ward is right? Or am I missing something? Nortonius (talk) 22:55, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Gone. Ealdgyth - Talk 15:37, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Great! I felt in need of another pair of eyes on this, so much appreciated. Nortonius (talk) 16:11, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

text: And I've just removed the bit about Bede, Berhtwald and Meare, because Bede doesn't mention it and per Abrams, Lesley (1996), Anglo-Saxon Glastonbury, p. 91, n. 88. Nortonius (talk) 16:25, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Glastonbury...?
Talk:Birinus

message: Why is he wearing green gloves in the stained glass window? Does anybody more knowledgeable than me know? It just seems like it might be significant.--Kawaii-Soft (talk) 19:25, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Green Gloves? 
Talk:Rafael Guízar y Valencia

message: Y para que chingaos hacen santo a otro viejo puto y violador de chamacos?
¿De donde sacas esa información? Hay que procurar que la información sea verídica y comprobable y no puras especulaciones--Antonio herbac 20:29, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Um this is the English language Wikipedia guys. If you want to put back him being uncle of Marcial Maciel I guess you can, but X being uncle of Y is usually just trivia.--T. Anthony 20:56, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "He was an uncle of Marcial Maciel, the founder of the Legion of Christ, a position from which he was removed by the Holy See."  The Holy See cannot change history; the lamented Fr Maciel cannot be removed from the position of being the founder of the Legion of Christ.  --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 04:16, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  what does this mean?  

message: I have no desire to defend anyone here, but what is the "new significance" that this long quotation about noise and children had as a result of Pope Benedict's actions?  There is no reference here.  Innuendo doesn't qualify for a Wiki article. --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 04:24, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  what does the noise have to do with anything? 

message: I'm going to be very careful to be polite here but Elizium23 added a copy violation tag to this article in February. It is not clear to me however where the violation is. Nor is it clear that the issue has been followed up to draw attention to concerns and how to address. Could I kindly ask for clarification as to the issue please or directed to where the relevant discussion may be taking place. Thanks in advance. Contaldo80 (talk) 23:49, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The text is copied verbatim from the KofC official website Elizium23 (talk) 00:12, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. Did you follow-up with posting details of the violation on the relevant discussion board? Contaldo80 (talk) 00:52, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I asked a question a little while ago and would appreciate a response. Can you point to where you followed up as you are meant to do for a copy violation or did you just tag the article with no explanation about what the initial concern was? Thanks. Contaldo80 (talk) 05:40, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy violation
Talk:Bollandist

message: At some point, this needs to be moved to Bollandists, as the  form of the name is in the plural. — LlywelynII 00:47, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Move

message: None of these "sources" are currently being used by the article:
* . 
* . , , & 
* .
* . 
Kindly restore them once they are being used to verify statements in the text. — LlywelynII 01:10, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources for article expansion
Talk:Bregowine

message: This source lists him as August 24.  Is there any support for August 24?--Richardson mcphillips (talk) 01:42, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  date of feast 
Talk:Bruno the Great

message: Bruno I (Archbishop of Cologne) → Bruno the Great — Simplicity, and it's not uncommon (see Britannica). — Srnec (talk) 05:58, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I just moved this. Seems relatively uncontroversial. Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 06:11, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:Bruno (bishop of Würzburg)

message: none of the 'sources' give any information about his life.  That makes it original research, and there are many others who love to go around and try to delete things.
But it does become a bit more pressing when there is a source with a different date for his feast day, namely May 17.  Is May 27 a mistake for 17?  --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 02:05, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  feast day
Talk:Burchard of Würzburg

message: The approval of Pepin the Short as king, given by Pope Zachary II, allowed the Carolingians to supplant the Merovingians as rulers of the Frankish kingdom. I have corrected the error in the text.76.123.208.229 (talk) 12:22, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Carolingians, not Merovingians

message: According to the Roman Martyrology, St. Burchard's feast day is on February 2. October 14 is the date of the translation of his relics. The date in the text should be changed. Caeruleancentaur (talk) 02:39, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of Feast Day
Talk:Caesarius of Heisterbach

message: In accordance with the first sentence, shouldn't the article title be "Caesarius of Heisterbach", with "Caesar of Heisterbach" references being redirected?
 
 Also, the Titivillus article claims that the first reference by name to Titivillus occurred 45 years after Caesarius' death - and that claim is cited, whereas the claim of Caesarius' naming is not.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.40.60.235 (talk) 23:42, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This proposed change has now been done; I have changed his name to Caesarius of Heisterbach on all the article pages except the redirect page from Caesar of Heisterbach. I left other talk pages as they were. — Objectivesea (talk) 09:21, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  couple of items: 
Talk:Catherine of Bologna

message: This article needs a photo. Immediately. --98.232.182.66 (talk) 09:21, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo. NOW.

message: Dear saintly Poor Clare, so rich in love for Jesus and Mary, you were endowed with great talents by God and you left us most inspiring writingsand paintings for wondrous beauty. You were chosen as Abbess in the monastery of Poor Clares at Bologna. You did all for Gods greater gloryand in this you are a model for all. Make artists learn lessons from you and use their talents to the full.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.123.95.14 (talk) 22:00, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prayer to Saint Catherine of Bologna 

message: First art picture and of who 2A02:C7F:B087:A800:6467:B305:D350:2708 (talk) 07:18, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  First art picture And of how
Talk:Eugène de Mazenod

message: This article was badly damaged by aggressive vandalism on November 8, 2007. I and 12 Noon tried to fix what we could, but someone who is willing to do more work on this needs to look at it.--Mumia-w-18 23:16, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  November 8, 2007 vandalism 
Talk:Clare of Montefalco

message: I see the Augustinians have her on Aug 17; the older Roman Martyrology has her on Aug 18, the day of her death.  --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 15:29, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  feast day 

message: ...but, you did. The skeletal relics mentioned are those of Clare of Assisi, a Franciscan, and founder of the Poor Clares, NOT Clare of Montefalco, an Augustinian abbess.  
Clare of Montefalco is an Incorruptible, and her body is not reduced to bones, and visitors to Montefalco do not see a wax effigy, but rather the saint's body itself, along with the heart and gallstone reliquaries.  
Clare of Assisi IS now a pile of bones only visible to nuns, behind a wax statue in a glass sarcophagus in Assisi, along with a reliquary containing her hair and fingernails. 2600:1700:9830:2080:8964:EC86:F257:251C (talk) 15:36, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Not to be confused with Clare of Assisi"
Talk:Indian Ocean kestrels

message: It would be better if these articles were seperated, just an idea though. --Mitternacht90 22:41, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Do these form a clade? if not, why do they have an article? Seems pretty arbitrary. FunkMonk (talk) 17:34, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  It would be better... 
Talk:Conrad of Piacenza

message: The article states that St Conrad performed the Miracle of the Bread in 1348-49. It also states “When the waiting period required by Church law expired in 1485, this process was opened by Bishop Dalmazio Gabriele, O.P., who had himself witnessed the Miracle of the Bread.”  How could Bishop Dalmazio open the case in 1485 AND have been a witness to the miracle of the bread which occurred at least ~136 years earlier? 50.196.38.217 (talk) 20:38, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date discrepancy
Talk:Cormac mac Cuilennáin

message: Can we get some pronunciations on this article? Considering Irish orthography isn't straightforward and obvious. 173.79.61.198 (talk) 22:46, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciations 

message: Hello 
The last sentence in the intro "He was killed in Leinster" seems unnecessary and potentially confusing since the sentence before mentions the battle he was killed in (not contradictory just redundant).
Thanks Geographynerd101 (talk) 20:07, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Simplify Intro Redundancy
Talk:Cyprian, Metropolitan of Kiev

message: "Bulgarian nationality" applied to a 14th century person may be a bit misleading to contemporary readers for whom the term denotes an amalgamation of a number of characteristics (jurisdiction, ethnic origin, language, customs, loyalty, place of more or less permanent residence, etc) of which only few could be said to have applied to Cyprian or people of his time and status. The Bulgarian article refers to his family line ("rod") Camblak, while the Russian describes him as either Serb or Bulgarian born in Tarnovo —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.75.128.8 (talk) 09:35, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: But there's no problem calling him "Serbian"? 151.237.126.24 (talk) 23:51, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  suggestion
Talk:Daniele Comboni

message: The title of this article should, according to Wikipedia's normal guidelines, be "Daniele Comboni". See, for example, his article in the language of of his home country. For links to comparable examples, see Chronological list of saints and blesseds in the 19th century and Chronological list of saints and blesseds in the 20th century (he should be added). Pol098 (talk) 11:52, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed per MOS:SAINTS. I cannot since Daniele Comboni already exists, but have requested an administrator do it via Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests#Uncontroversial technical requests. Sondra.kinsey (talk) 13:41, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  The title of this article should be "Daniele Comboni" 

message: Why did Pope Pius IX object? Sondra.kinsey (talk) 17:38, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Order of the Knight of Italy 

message: St daniel comboni 2A00:1851:18:3C8A:EC8D:9A4F:BE3:F5AD (talk) 17:40, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  10 sentences
Talk:Bloor Street

message: 28.08.06 - This article has been in part copied into gtawiki.ca If anyone wants to check the accuracy of that article feel free to do so.
Change: Bloor St. E stops at Parliament, not at the DVP. Torontois 02:52, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've reverted this change, as Bloor Street East extends past Parliament Street to the Prince Edward Viaduct.  dcandeto 09:17, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: if someone can please point out where one would pass by the somoli community on bloor street. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 172.192.89.70 (talk) 06:52, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  somali 
Talk:Didier of Cahors

message: Though this article credits Catholic Encyclopedia as one among its sources, and though it is in fact more neutral in tone and more historical in approach, it has been thoughtlessly applied with the template This article could be usefully expanded with text from the public-domain Catholic Encyclopedia. --Wetman 03:45, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Dorothea of Montau

message: The opening paragraph states that she was canonized in 1976.  The "Veneration" paragraph states that she was beatified in 1976.  They both can't be true.  I believe the confusion results from the sources used which are ambiguous.  In 1976 her "cultus was confirmed" by Pope Paul VI.  If I am not mistaken, this is an equivalent beatification, not an equivalent canonization, as her public veneration is limited to the area of Poland where she lived. Caeruleancentaur (talk) 10:07, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  No canonization
Talk:Eanflæd

message: ???  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.13.99.40 (talk) 19:06, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation? 

message: The current cite template is deprecated and produces an External link error message. According to this weekly update run , the page is in need of clean up. The templates are offered at Template: Cite ODNB, where much has been worked on. Why was it better before with an error message? Regards. The joy of all things (talk) 11:33, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The cite ODNB template is inferior because (at least in this case) it does not give a link to the ODNB article and it shows oswiu in uncapitalised, which is wrong. I have to go out now but I will check and come back to you on the error message. Dudley Miles (talk) 11:42, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  It does provide a link, you click the blue DOI link, and the title can be written in any case as the parameter is free text and so can be either Oswiu, oswiu, or even OSWIU if the source deems it to be written as such. If it was uncapitalised, then that was my fault. The joy of all things (talk) 11:47, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: There are two links in , one to the wiki article on ODNB, the other to the  DNB page on public library access. There is no blue doi link to the ODNB Oswiu article on my computer. I see that the old link was dated 2012 and now outdated, so I have updated it. Do you see any problem with my up to date version? Dudley Miles (talk) 15:19, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it all looks fine. Within the template I used, you can link to the Wiki ODNB article if needed, though can't see why that's absolutely necessary, and the DOI blue link is there for me in that template. Hopefully resolved now? Regards. The joy of all things (talk) 16:27, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: OK thanks. Dudley Miles (talk) 17:20, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  ODNB cite template
Talk:Radius Prawiro

message: I have moved the following from the article.  diff by anon user User:66.73.193.32 (talk)
*"The above is incorrect. He is not related by blood to Ibu Tien, the wife of the former president Suharto."Mr Stephen 22:51, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Dispute

message: His Father Actually The NAme Is Suradi Prawiro, And He also Not related By Blood To Ibu Tien The Wife of former President Soeharto--202.73.126.86 11:59, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Radius Prawiro 
Talk:Eadburh of Winchester

message: There are two saints with very similar names: Eadburgh of Winchester, Hants., and Eadburh of Bicester, Oxfordshire, whose shrine is preserved in Stanton Harcourt. This article appears to confuse the two. I suggest that there shouldn't be a misleading pic referring to the Oxfordshire saint, namely :File:St Michael, Stanton Harcourt, Oxon - Shrine to St Edburg - geograph.org.uk - 1610457.jpg MinorProphet (talk) 16:49, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree and have deleted the image. Dudley Miles (talk) 17:35, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which saint?
Talk:Ecgberht of Ripon

message: I think there is some confusion here. Is it possible that https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egbert_of_Lindisfarne was the bishop? And Ecgberht of Ripon never become bishop, "only a monk"?  He is also not mentioned here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bishop_of_Durham  Qwertzu111111 (talk) 19:15, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It appears you are correct; Ecgberht of Ripon was never Bishop of Lindisfarne. Manannan67 (talk) 16:55, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  was he really bishop of Lindisfarne?
Talk:Emmelia of Caesarea

message: I have made the following clarification to the intial section of this article:
FROM
However, she is not the only woman in her family to be venerated as a saint. Both her mother-in-law, Macrina the Elder, as well as her daughters, Macrina the Younger and Theosebia are recognized as saints in the Eastern Orthodox Church.
TO
However, she is not the only woman in her family to be venerated as a saint. Both her mother-in-law, Macrina the Elder, as well as her daughters, Macrina the Younger and Theosebia are recognized as saints in the Catholic Church (except for Theosebia) and Eastern Orthodox Church.
All changes are verifiable by clicking the information on the individual's article.MicaelTru (talk) 19:51, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Eucherius of Orléans

message: ==Untitled==
Is it really necessary to use AD on dates referring to Christians? Caeruleancentaur (talk) 02:31, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: AD?

message: Is it really necessary to use AD on dates referring to Christians? Caeruleancentaur (talk) 02:31, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Eugénie Smet

message: Looks like there are a lot of sources that could help expand but I don't know which would be best for inline. Expansion/better citation would be great. Coralshin (talk) 01:33, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: Why not Sister? Mademoiselle appears as well. Although it seems if a book was written about her she was known as Mother Marie.--134.153.8.19 (talk) 14:50, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blessed but soeur?
Talk:Eugenios of Trebizond

message: * Evolution of his cult. Jan Olof Rosenqvist's article & his monograph supply a lot of info on this.
* The relationship of Eugenios & the Empire of Trebizon
* The monastery of St Eugenios in Trebizond & other buildings related to this personage.
* Comparison with other local saints of Anatolia/modern Turkey
Proper coverage of these items would be a qualification for this article to reach FA status. (I'll let someone else argue over the importance of an infobox.) -- llywrch (talk) 16:46, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestions for further development
Talk:Eustathius of Antioch

message: Roger Pearse may have found a lead on a manuscript of the lost Eustathii Antiocheni Episcopi liber de mundi creatione, idest de sex dierum operibus. See here. Let's pray it pans out. Rwflammang (talk) 14:23, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: More writings?

message: Ocyril (talk) 03:37, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death of Eustathius 

message: Eustathius' dispute on Origen theory was with Eusebius of Caesarea, not Nicomedia. I would change it but I'm not sure what the citation says, and I don't want to challenge someone named "philostorgius" or whatever. 
More on this: On Eusebius of Nicomedia's wikipedia page, it says E. Nicomedia was responsible for exiling Eustathius. I don't think it's sourced and I can't find another source (but haven't looked very hard). Maybe E. Nicomedia oversaw the council, and had some authority or say? I don't know, it's confusing when people have the same name. But the initial argument is said to have been between Eustathius and Eusebius of Caesaria, whatever Nicomedia's role. 76.19.232.52 (talk) 00:56, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong Eusebius
Talk:Saints Faith, Hope and Charity

message: The Three Sisters volcanos in Oregon are called Faith, Hope and Charity.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.160.116.189 (talk) 19:21, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Felix of Burgundy

message: Upgraded to 'C' class prior to further expansion. --Amitchell125 (talk) 16:05, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Felix of Burgundy (died 647 or 648) was a saint and the first bishop of the kingdom of the East Angles.
I couldn't believe a featured article would begin with a mistake! "Was a saint?" But somebody fixed it! Vajzë Blu (talk) 17:03, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  From today's featured article
Talk:Felix of Cantalica

message: This title seems to misspell the name of the native city of this person, which is Cantalice, according to the official website of the town. Yet that version refers to this spelling. Shouldn't this be corrected per the official name of the town in question? Daniel the Monk (talk) 04:12, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It was moved in 2006.  I've no idea why, but I can't move it back.  JASpencer (talk) 10:01, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Ferdinand the Holy Prince

message: I have found several sources which generally support "Holy Prince", although they also throw up some other possible names for the article (please see below). Moonraker (talk) 10:05, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  Sounds like "Ferdinand the Holy Prince" is the best choice.  Works well enough when abbreviated in the prose text ("Ferdinand the Holy", "the Holy Prince", etc.)  There are already shortcuts via "Ferdinand of Portugal", but I'd prefer to stay away from that as "Ferdinand of Portugal" in prose text implies a king and can be confused with those of that name. Walrasiad (talk) 12:24, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  Decided to be bold. Moved it and fixed the prose.  You're right. It sounds better this way. Walrasiad (talk) 12:42, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: English-language sources for name
Talk:Philaret Drozdov

message: We use both forms in various places.  We have to choose one, and be consistent throughout,  --  Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 23:09, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Philaret or Filaret?

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Filaret of Moscow. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 05:14, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Filaret of Moscow" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]