lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Lost Gardens of Heligan

message: This should be moved to The Lost Gardens of Heligan. The 'the' is part of the name, and so cannot be left out. - Kwekubo
:I checked this out before moving, looked like it was common to use without "the".  We don't always have to use the fullest formal title imaginable, for instance the article is at United States not the official name United States of America. Stan 23:42, 9 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Catchy media title considering the gardens were planted, managed, overgrown/neglected and later restored ... Heligen Gardens would be appropriate, would it not? --81.178.226.217 (talk) 20:36, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hi, I had altered the image link because if you go to the image page, the link to this page is in red. I do not quite understand how to link between the commons and Wikipedia - could you fix the link, or show me how? Thanks, Marky1981 10:03, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image moved to commons 

message: I can't believe it - nobody has made a page on the pineapple pit!  I will set about one when I get a chance....  It seems like a wonderful piece of redundant Victorian technology that should be preserved for people to understand on wikipedia... If anyone has a chance before I do, please have a go at making one (page that is, not pit). --Tomhannen 21:52, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: No pineapple pit page?!

message: Some explanation of this element of the name needs to be given, since they are not lost and never seem to have been.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  03:27, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Lost" 

message: The article uses this spelling of the supposedly correct pronunciation:  'h'LIG'n'.
I don't know what this is supposed to represent.  Are there schwas between the H and the L, and between the G and the N?  Or are the apostrophes supposed to represent glottal stops?  Is the central vowel /i/, /ɪ/ or /aɪ/?  Would someone who knows what is intended please add the IPA for this?  CodeTalker (talk) 18:58, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Wiktionary has [hɛˈlɪkɛn] for Revived Middle Cornish (Wiktionary:helygen). On the other hand on http://heligan.com/videos/P25/ the sculptor says it the usual way at 37 seconds. Siuenti (talk) 21:32, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation
Talk:Knowledge Navigator

message: text now merged and identical but I do not know how to make the rest, wether it be a redirect or something else AlainV 00:49, 2004 Feb 10 (UTC)
The 1968 paper "Computer as a Communications Device" by JCR Licklider and Robert Taylor of ARPA describes an agent named OLIVER that is remarkably like the Knowledge Navigator scenario. See http://gatekeeper.dec.com/pub/DEC/SRC/publications/taylor/licklider-taylor.pdf
Hey does anyone else see disturbing similarities with Apple products now? Like the chat in the professor video -- it's basically Leopard's iChat, with the ability to share presentations and whatnot. Apple's already stuck a Web cam on all its notebook computers, too. The speech recognition in Mac OS X isn't far off from this, either. There might not be some dude talking back, but I'd say (as far as vision statements) Apple's pretty darn close. Especially with the advent of the iPhone. Thoughts? Bderwest 20:04, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Talk

message: Add vector-based media, and a few thousand years of interstellar travel, and you have The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy! Oh, you know you were thinking it. --Ayelis 20:45, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  H2G2 

message: The following appears to be opinion, not encyclopedic
"as powerful a vision of the future of computing as 2001: A Space Odyssey."
: Agree. It's hard to compare "a powerful vision of the future of computing" and would suggest deletion of this phrase or at least a rewording. ---Invenio 02:59, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV?

message: Does anyone have more info on Apple Creative Services? Does it still exist as a business unit? What were its beginnings and purposes? If someone has more info on it, maybe an extra article about Apple Creative Services would be nice. ---Invenio 03:01, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Any more info on Apple Creative Services?
Talk:Scottish Lowlands

message: In the Scottish Highlands article, note the sentence:
:Culturally the area is quite different from the Scottish Lowlands.
This is absolutely correct and one of the main reasons why the Northeast plain around Aberdeen should not be considered part of the Highlands.  It is culturally and geographically part of the Lowlands.  The Highlands start west of it on a line which roughly follows the foothills of the mountains.  Ie Stonehaven, Aboyne, Alford, Dufftown, Nairn, approximately.  The Battle of Harlaw was only one example of the area fighting off the predations of the "wild Highlandmen".  The article needs to be altered to show this. -- Derek Ross 01:11, 10 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment 

message: Is the map used here particularly helpful?  The boundary shown on the map bears no similarity to any of the boundaries given in the text.  This may be the problem of the text, rather than the map, but whichever is at fault needs amending.  As it stands, the map, which is supposed to assist in understanding the text, is about as much use as a chocolate teapot.  Skinsmoke (talk) 03:54, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map
Talk:Yield (finance)

message: In Engineering exist other definition to Yield, but not the same available in the Article "Yield (Engineering)". In a production chain, Yield is defined by the ratio between the number of manufactured products that meet the expected specs and the number of manufactured products. It measures the probability to obtain one guarantee product in the manufacture line. Where this version must be defined?? In a new article?? The article about Yield (Finance) must be extended??  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jsaenznoval (talk • contribs) 21:17, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I suppose Yield (Engineering) is the proper place for this - certainly not Yield (finance), which has nothing to do with engineering. --Jonathan G. G. Lewis 03:17, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment by jsaenznoval

message: Greetings Wikipedians! The text about these securities was much more detailed than that of the other terms in this section. There's a separate Wikipedia article on this type of security, and that's where that level of detail belongs. So I linked to that article. I'll read through the separate Wikipedia article on TIPS and see if it needs improvement so we don't lose anything important. Cordially, BuzzWeiser196 (talk) 14:02, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities 

message: Today I published multiple changes. There's more work to be done, but today the main goals were 1) compliance with the policy on Verifiability of sources (too many statements lacked citations - I added them where I could), 2)reduce repetitive detail (some of the sections have their own Wikipedia articles) and 3) delete text that didn't pertain directly to yield. I deleted the Annuities section entirely, because it contained an unsourced statement that would lead a novice investor to choose annuities over other investments. Annuities are often marketed aggressively by stockbrokers. As written the section came too close to giving investment advice with nothing to point the reader to a reliable source. Also deleted the section on preferred trust units because it made virtually no reference to yield; seemed to serve no purpose. Cordially, BuzzWeiser196 (talk) 16:56, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The inflation-protected securities subsection seemed obtuse and out of place. It is in this article only because it is a special case (coupon payments fluctuate). So I moved it a new section called "Special Cases" and added text about another special case: floating rate notes and bonds. Cordially, BuzzWeiser196 (talk) 14:28, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reasons for today's changes
Talk:Luvdisc

message: Is it certain that Luvdisc takes its name from "discus"? I thought it might be more related to "discette," since Luvdisc is extremely thin like a diskette.--68.202.12.184 19:34, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A discus is type of fish. JudgeSpear 21:16, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Discus"
Talk:Innings

message: Ordinarily, the whole British/American english debate doesn't really bother me.  But this idea of using "innings" as a singular noun sounds like nails on a chalkboard.  Brrr. Meelar 02:33, 4 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, but the cricket usage spills out into British English in other contexts, as the article says.  Does this happen in the US (e.g., "the President has had a good inning")? -- ALoan (Talk) 12:37, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  Probably not.  A baseball player's inning or at-bat doesn't last that long.  American publications occasionally use 'had a good innings'.  Although here's CNN's Richard Quest, (originally British), getting in a muddle: "Our tech guys response to my predicament sums up my feeling: "It (Quest's laptop) had a good innings. I guess this is an appropriate answer in the baseball city of Chicago."   Hakluyt bean (talk) 23:04, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: British vs. American

message: First the article states "each side has two innings." but then the example says "Sri Lanka made 464 in the third innings (of the game)". Perhaps this is correct for one of the variations of cricket but I believe in the essential incomprehensibility of "cricket" and don't want to wade through all the articles. Should this example be changed? Rmhermen 16:21, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see why it should be changed. It's correct, and fits in with the definition given in the article. "Each side has two innings" means there are four innings in the game:
*first team's first innings (first innings of the game)
*second team's first innings (second innings of the game)
*first team's second innings (third innings of the game)
*second team's second innings (fourth innings of the game)
In fact, I think it's a good illustration of the difference between the cricket and baseball definitions of the word, since in baseball these would be considered "half-innings", and therefore a valuable example. -dmmaus 22:53, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: How many innnings?

message: Article states: "An inning, or innings, is a fixed-length segment of a game"
If innings last as long as there are still batsmen, then the length can vary. It is not a "fixed" length  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.100.124.219 (talk) 14:47, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: innnings - fixed length?

message: An inning in Baseball is one thing, and an innings in cricket something else. Both can (and should) be explained fully in each or those articles. It's not like "bat" where the word is the same and has many different uses. There is no need for this as a separate article.
Another-sailor (talk) 15:04, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is this a seperate article? 

message: The information in this section is false. The term is immemorial and the earliest known record of it is dated 1730, as has been the case for a long time. I will rewrite it in due course. Jack | talk page 11:02, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin
Talk:Socialist Alliance (England)

message: I added subcategories to encourage expansion.  These headings are only suggestions. A few tables of election returns could be inserted.  SA website is now defunct and for sale, but I haven't deleted the link. Added link to 2001 election platform which is a 1.6 MB PDF file on the SADP website.  If this violates protocol, then we should just make a note following the SADP. 
DJ Silverfish 18:38, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expanding this Entry 

message: I added a photo from the back of the 2001 election manifesto.  It may be too large for the page. 
Here is a smaller logo: .   These should be in the public domain now. DJ Silverfish 23:05, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding a graphic 

message: I've added the following tables to the discussion page, but the layout is not quite what it should be.  I can find some, but not all of the relevant information.  This could be updated and added to the main page later, if sources can be found.  DJ Silverfish 19:58, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Election Results 

message: *We have results from each by-election since 1997 linked from the list of UK by-elections. Warofdreams 11:21, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  By-election Results 
Talk:Soviet–Afghan War

message: Can someone add the Afghan Armed Forces in the units involved section (preferably above paramilitaries)? It was not just Afghan paramilitaries that fought the war, but the Afghan Armed Forces as well. AfghanParatrooper19891 (talk) 20:50, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Units involved section  

message: Can we please add Maoist fighters back to the infobox of the page, since Wikipedia is supposed to cover all details of a war? It was removed for very shaky reasons, the idea being that Maoists didn't play any actual role and the one major Maoist leader (Majid Kalakani) died in 1980. But that's not true. There were multiple Maoist factions, specifically ALO, SAMA and AMFF, and several major Maoist leaders such as Faiz Ahmad and Mulavi Dawood. They were killed in 1986, but were still leaders in the war up to that point, and the Maoists were an active (though considerably less so compared to the Islamists) presence in the war.
I don't necessarily believe they need to be a separate entry from the Afghan Mujahideen section, as that's an all-encompassing title, but they can be included as part of them. How about something like this?
 Nights At Nyte (talk) 07:28, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: This works amazingly. Thank you! AfghanParatrooper19891 (talk) 13:07, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

text: The infobox is already way too bloated. Make a case at TP that these additions are supported by the article per WP:INFOBOXPURPOSE. Furthermore, entries in the commanders parameter need to be reviewed to what is reflected by the article. Cinderella157 (talk) 22:06, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maoist mujahideen fighters 

message: I saw that flag at a parade at the time and decided to digitalise it… I don’t know what it means but it wasn’t used for Sarandoy. AfghanParatrooper19891 (talk) 06:59, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed. Too much cruft here anyway. Cinderella157 (talk) 00:38, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for your contributions! AfghanParatrooper19891 (talk) 16:10, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  That blue flag for the Sarandoy isn’t an Afghan flag…
Talk:Zuytdorp

message: Hey User:Zuytdorp Survivor, great article ! But you're not supposed to put your Wikipedia user name in the article. Also the "to be added..." line doesn't look good in the article. It can be replaced by at least 1 line of encylopedic value. Jay 07:15, 10 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Luna 24

message: I'm pondering about the bold part of this sentence:
As of 2003 the Soviet Union nor the countries of the former Soviet Union have launched any other spacecraft to the moon, although they did launch several unmanned spacecraft to Venus, Mars and also one to Comet Halley.
Should spacecraft to other planets be mentioned? We have to mention that this was the last Soviet Union/former Soviet Union countries spacecraft to the moon I think, but if we say nothing more I think it will leave the reader puzzled. Didn't they launch any more unmanned spacecraft? And I think it's also relevant to say they focused on other things. Laudaka 07:24, 10 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Should we mention that the Soviet Union/Russia did launch spacecraft to other planets?
Talk:Stanisław Maczek

message: How do I link to the pics in other Wikipedias?Halibutt 09:51, 10 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: That was a looong time ago :) Halibutt 17:19, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: This article is currently at start/C class, but could be improved to B-class if it had more (inline) citations. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 17:58, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  B-class review
Talk:Hot dog

message: For education purpose Ivantan1113 (talk) 20:12, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. --Ferien (talk) 21:25, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 16 April 2024 

message: A hot dog[1][2] is a dish consisting of a grilled, steamed, or boiled sausage served in the slit of a partially sliced bun.[3]
I don't think most of that is true --
Frozen hot dogs don't come with buns but they're still labeled "hot dogs" - so I don't think the bun is a requirement.  
Further, hot dogs don't have to be grilled, steamed, or boiled - in fact, they're pre-cooked and can be eaten out of the package, without any of those types of preparation, whatsoever.   57.135.233.22 (talk) 00:03, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree, in my opinion, without bun it's not "Hot Dog", it's just sausage, nothing else than it only, in fact, every time you see a hot dog, you will see a bun in the ingredients, whenever. 177.105.90.10 (talk) 14:10, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bun
Talk:Internet child pornography/Archive 1

message: This was originally written as a writeup for Everything2. It received mixed reviews and was quickly nuked by the censors (gods). I rewrote the text and changed the writing a bit to fit the Wikipedia style better.
Please note that I do not advocate producing, selling, downloading or posessing child porn. But I believe that people should have free and unfettered access to all sorts of information and make informed personal choices afterwards.
Searching for child porn is legal in most countries. Downloading and posessing it is also legal in many. Providing information about ways to find it is legal practically everywhere, except, may be, for some islamic fundamentalist states. --Paranoid October 9, 2003
:And was deleted there, too. --Morven 20:22, 9 Oct 2003 (UTC)

message: :However much you like to reiterate it, the point is not whether this is legal or not. The point is whether we think it is appropriate for Wikipedia. This text is a poorly disguised "download illegal child pornography" How-To. I don't want to speculate about the uploader's motives, but it looks like plain trollbait. I have no desire to feed trolls, but this can not stay. Wikipedia is not a criminal's toolshop. Kosebamse 23:31, 9 Oct 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: We can have topics about illegal things, says [[User:Kosebamse]]

message: Needs a title change: simply Internet child pornography. Such an article would certainly include a link to Operation Ore: a recent UK police operation. Can we move this to user:Cyan/Internet child pornography, or are there any objections? Martin 23:18, 9 Oct 2003 (UTC)
thread_title:  title
Talk:List of human anatomical parts named after people

message: should this just be incorporated into List of human anatomical features?
--zandperl 15:19, 10 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: no a link is sufficient in the "see also" and thats already been done. Jay 15:42, 10 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd rather keep this subset of human anatommical features as I'm planning to include links to the people involved too (to match List of eponymous diseases and List of eponymous medical signs. I may move this article to List of eponymous anatomical parts if there are no objections - in order to make all titles similar. Dave 15:41, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hello all. I just added a couple of missing things (Nissl stuff and Meibomian glands), which I assume is not controversial, though Nissl's contributions have largely been superceded by more modern terms.Perhaps a bit more controversially, I have deleted a couple of references, namely to medical conditions (hernias) rather than anatomical parts. It's my understanding that this page is strictly (per the title) for anatomical structures, rather than for conditions. Else it would start becoming too cumbersome (e.g just off the top of my head, add Turner, Kleinfelter, Patau, Alzheimer, etc...). As well, I think there is a separate page for epynomous medical conditions.Last thought: I disagree with changing this to "Eponymous human parts" or whatever, since I think many readers would not know what an eponym is - unless that page would somehow link with the above page name. I'm not sure how this would be accomplished, but I'm sure many of you would... All the best, Esseh 01:14, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anatomy, not conditions. 

message: If anatomical  or disease conditions named-after-people (e.g.:Mallory-Weiss syndrome) don't belong here then should another list be started to encompass some of these conditions-named-after-people? ~ hydnjo talk   06:40, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Hydnjo. See above, for epynomous medical conditions. Mallory-Weiss should fit in there, but (IMHO) not here. Feel free to dispute this, it's just my opinion. Esseh 06:45, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Anatomical conditions

message: According to the introduction (regarding "Loop of Henle" as the example), "Calyx of Held" should be moved to the "H" section (removed from the "C" section). I have not yet made this change, pending concurrence. Copymox (talk) 18:17, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  basis of order in the list
Talk:Warcraft: Orcs & Humans

message: I think we should write an all-inclusive article about the Warcraft Universe, I think it deserves the same treatment as Lord of the Rings does. I can help with most of it since I am familiar with the game and its storyline. If you are willing to help, please do so.
UED77 19:35, 2004 Jun 30 (UTC)
:Please sign your posts with 3 tildes, ~~~, or 4 ~~~~.  Both methods automatically sign your name.  The latter method inserts a time stamp and is the preferred method. :-)
::Alright UED77 19:35, 2004 Jun 30 (UTC)
:For your Warcraft Universe article you want to write, first create a link in the article—actually in all the Warcraft articles—and insert your article there.  Don't worry if all you have is a stub—all articles have to start somewhere. —Frecklefoot 16:32, May 24, 2004 (UTC)
::As for why Warcraft Universe is better than Azeroth as the main article, there's also another reason - Draenor is also part of the Warcraft Universe. Ausir 20:55, 30 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. The Warcraft Universe page helps disambiuate the issue. --Omni gamer 04:08, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Warcraft Universe

message: in norway it was published by blackmArket. i still have the disc. it says blackmArket on the left side. 84.208.108.74 (talk) 12:07, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  norwegian release