Template talk:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places

message: Want to add a featured list parameter. Category is already created. The text (preferably after the FA parameter) should be:
: |fl|Fl|FL=
Thanks. -Ebyabe (talk) 17:29, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Happy‑melon 20:11, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Much obliged. :) -Ebyabe (talk) 22:08, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  FL addition 

message: To support the newly created project portal, could the following changes be made, please:
:
| 
:
|
:
This article is within the scope of the National Register of Historic Places WikiProject, 
a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of listings on the U.S. National Register of Historic Places.
:
 |redirect|Redirect=
:
 |Portal|portal=
:
 |NA|Na|na=
Essentially, stick the portal bits between the pre-existing parts as shown above. Portal category already created. Any questions, please to ask. Thanks! --Ebyabe (talk) 22:49, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Happy‑melon 19:44, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Portal additions 

message: Could the prior portal edits be undone for the time being, please? They can always be un-undone later. Thanks! :) --Ebyabe (talk) 00:03, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Shouldn't be a problem, seeing as you requested them all. However, I'm not sure which version you want to go back to... please clarify, unless another admin knows —αlεx•mullεr 11:52, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the  link - the presence of the portal parameter shouldn't be a problem, but rather allow you to keep track of the pages involved in building your portal.  You certainly don't want to have to recategorise them once it's "finished". Re-add the tag when you think you're ready for the portal link to be restored. Happy‑melon 12:39, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please undo previous 

message: 
Please add the following parameter between the "start" and "B" ones. The matching category has already been created:
:
 |c|C=
Cheers! :) --Ebyabe (talk) 23:22, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Y Done with one small modification: I added the category as , as it appears that you meant to refer to this category.  02:44, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, in fact I did. Thanks for catching that. :) --Ebyabe (talk) 23:53, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  C-Class 

message: Can the template be modified to identify infoboxes that are missing?  This is a simple but time consuming task that can be easily be identified and placed in a category for any editor interested in cleanup to undertake.  I'd suggest using 'template' as the keyword.  If no is passed then add it to the category and maybe make a note in the infobox.  If yes or blank then ignore. We could do the same for articles without images.  However in that case, the request should be added to the appropriate state missing images category if possible. If not then one for the project. I'd suggest using 'image' as the keyword. Vegaswikian (talk) 19:46, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure what you're getting at.  In wp:NRHP, there are a couple existing wikiproject to-do lists, which could include infoboxes needed.  However, for NRHP infoboxes unlike those for many other wikiprojects, it is very easy to generate pretty good ones using the Elkman tools.  So to me it seems easier just to generate the infobox for a given article, rather than putting it on a list and building an administrative structure.  Also, about working in reqphoto features into the NRHP template, that is somewhat addressed by the Elkman NRHP generator including a properly formatted reqphoto for the corresponding talk page.  This regular reqphoto is part of most new NRHP stub articles.  And further, the extensive list-table system from List of National Register of Historic Places entries down, and rapidly being elaborated into table formats in many states such as List of RHPs in NY, List of RHPs in WI, etc., is providing tables to hold thumbnail photos (although that has not yet been developed in, say, List of RHPs in NV.  The blanks in those tables are effectively photo requests, and are working very well for many local photographers.  I'd be happy to help develop the Nevada list-article along those lines to illustrate, assuming you might be interested.  Would this change your perspective about need for other system changes via this NRHP template?  Happy to discuss more here, could be worth mentioning at wt:NRHP, too. doncram (talk) 20:13, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template or picture needed 

message: Replace IMAGE_LEFT image "File:Mountrushmore.jpg" with "File:Dean_Franklin_-_06.04.03_Mount_Rushmore_Monument_(by-sa).jpg".  Clearer and better image.  --  Wikipedical (talk) 23:20, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It doesn't look so good when it's so small. Might be better to upload a crop of the new image to use here. --- RockMFR 03:31, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. A cropped version would look better. --Dudemanfellabra (talk) 03:48, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Not done for now: nullifying the template until the crop is done. -Optigan13 (talk) 06:31, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: The code shows indication of "infobox=" and "attention=" fields which seem to be about allowing editors to mark that an infobox and/or attention is needed for the article.  How are those to be used in practice?  The documentation does not show these being used in the "full version" of applying the template.  The "infobox needed" aspect does show up in the drop-down towards the top of the documentation, however, but without indication how to use it.  At Talk:Stallings-Carpenter House, I tried adding "infobox=yes", "infobox=no", "infobox=1" already, and get no apparent result.  How can i use that?  Thanks for your consideration. --doncram (talk) 18:31, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Figured it out i guess from the metawhatever page.  Seems it is "attention=yes" but "needs-infobox=yes" which work. --doncram (talk) 18:44, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: You really need to learn how to steal from other projects. ;-) Vegaswikian (talk) 20:37, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  infobox needed and attention needed switches 

message: I'm in the early stages of developing a Lua-based replacement for , and I would appreciate peoples ideas for features. If there is anything that you have wanted to do with your WikiProject template, but haven't been able to due to limitations in the meta-template, I would be very interested to hear it. The discussion is over at Template talk:WPBannerMeta. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 13:43, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Feature brainstorm for [[Module:WikiProjectBanner]]