lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Three Soldiers (statue)

message: Who is "Lin"? His name (last name, presumably) seems to randomly appear as the "original" designer of the "first" design. I suspect (perhaps) word-for-word plagiarism that may not have provided context for the name. I hope not :( Cheeser1 01:54, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That would be Maya Lin, who designed the main part of the memorial. Raul654 02:01, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I am moving the following material here until it can be properly supported with reliable, secondary citations, per WP:V, WP:NOR, WP:IRS, WP:PSTS, et al. [ This diff] shows where it was in the article. Nightscream (talk) 03:44, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Uncited material in need of citations

message: I hesitate to move this article since the title Three Soldiers seems to be in common use, and it does appear on the late artist's website. Official sources, though, have the title as Three Servicemen:
* National Park Service — Three Servicemen
* Department of Defense — Three Servicemen
* Vietnam Veterans Memorial Fund — Three Servicemen
* Visiting DC — Three Servicemen
* Frederick Hart official site — Three Soldiers
Should this article be moved from Three Soldiers (statue) to Three Servicemen (statue)? — WFinch (talk) 16:50, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Three Soldiers, the ngrams seem pretty conclusive, and per the sculptor's name for his artwork. Randy Kryn (talk) 22:20, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The artist died in 1999, and I haven't found contemporaneous documentation of his own title for the work. The 1984 press release and fact sheet from the dedication title it Three Servicemen, but the work's title is buried rather deeply in both documents. I've been looking for news stories that reference any title. — WFinch (talk) 22:53, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Here's another seemingly conclusive ngram using the formal name The Three Soldiers. Randy Kryn (talk) 23:28, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Copyright for the sculpture Three Soldiers (1982) was registered by Frederick E. Hart & Vietnam Veterans Memorial Fund on November 8, 1983 (registration number Au000053504). — WFinch (talk) 23:46, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

text: Meanwhile, what a great idea! — WFinch (talk) 19:27, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Title of sculpture
Talk:Perebendya

message: What does perebendya mean? I see the definition of "old man" has been removed.  I always thought it was just anothre word for a kobzar. Ostap 08:25, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: . --Irpen 08:58, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Also check the page I used for refs (linked in the refs section). Scroll down to "Перебендя — у «Словарі української мови»" --Irpen 10:11, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Dale Meeks

message: There seems to be some conflicting information from some sources regarding his age and when he died. Sky News has an article that states he is 48, died on Saturday and died from heart failure. Here is the article. 
However, The Guardian, The Independent (which I have used as a source in the article), Chronicle Live and others state that he was 47, and give no cause of death. If this information is updated throughout the day, please feel free to update and correct the information accordingly. Fats40boy11 (talk) 07:09, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age and Death Date
Talk:Dallas Adams

message: I'm removing the palimony line again.  If it were true, don't you think a Google search for "Dallas Adams palimony" would turn up something besides Wikipedia mirrors?  If you can find a reliable source for the info, please feel free to add it back in. -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 18:09, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  There is something unusual here.  Dallas Adams was a member of the RSC in 1966.  If his date of birth is 1947, that would make him 19 in 1966.  There is no way DA was 19 then.  More like 25, which makes his birth year a more realistic 1941.Miletus (talk) 21:36, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Palimony?
Talk:Damon Packard

message: I tagged this article for its tone because it sounds a bit too resume-y and needs to be rewritten from a more neutral point of view. I'd rewrite it myself, but since I'm unfamiliar with Packard's career and work, I don't feel comfortable with doing so. I also took the liberty of removing what appeared to be a list of artwork and showings. Not only did it make no sense, it was formatted improperly as was the filmography. Pinkadelica Say it... 11:40, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV wording
Talk:Timbales

message: this article seriously needs a picture.. Habibko 01:35, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image? 

message: To exemplify the tipico style of playing timbales, we see the text: "The following five measure excerpt ...", but no such excerpt follows.   Was it lost during an earlier edit, perhaps? yoyo (talk) 06:54, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: It appears that an example was included back in 2014, but the attached .jpg was a red link, indicating that it may have been deleted. On 30 August 2014, nearly half of the article was deleted, including the tipico example that is no longer viewable. Dobbyelf62 (talk) 13:24, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing example
Talk:Daniel Balaji

message: I've changed the language as it didn't adhere to standards. The material needs to be sourced though.
86.25.219.182 (talk) 17:58, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Language 

message: Added career section to improve continuity, still needs references.Vanishingcattle (talk) 06:03, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Career
Talk:Daniel Palladino

message: This article is mainly about the shows he worked on. They are all notable, but they have their own articles. The text is also not neutral as it often praises him ("he helped to create", "he helped to launch"...). His "Personal life" section is unsourced. We don't even know the date of his birth. This is not in very good shape. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 11:27, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
Talk:List of characters in Nightfire

message: It's only Pierce Brosnan's likeness that appears in the game. "Q" looks nothing like Desmond Llewelyn and "M's" face is never actually seen, so we can't tell if she looks like Judi Dench or not. 98.16.169.135 (talk) 09:18, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, Q is not voiced by John Cleese at all. I'm going to remove the false information. Christophee (talk) 01:37, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Likenesses 

message: Oh, so that's his heritage. Where did you get that from. Also, isn't his name Rafael not Raphael? (Aurumpotestasest (talk) 17:20, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Drake: Brazilian/Russian 

message: Does anybody know why not all the information shows up on each character's infobox? The infoboxes are almost completely filled in, but only the name, affiliation and portrayed sections actually show up on the page. Does anybody know how to fix it? Christophee (talk) 16:50, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind, I see that most of those fields have been removed from the infobox so that's why they don't show up on the page. Is there any point in removing the unnecessary fields from the infoboxes or should we just leave them there? Christophee (talk) 17:05, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infoboxes
Talk:Okada (motorcycle taxi)

message: It is a term for commercial motorcycles (and cyclists) in Nigeria.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.206.136.14 (talk) 16:06, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What '''''it''''' is

message: a recent article in the Economist metnions these but in a Sierra Leonean context - is the term widepsead across W. Africa then (and not just Nigeria as this article implies)?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.128.96.222 (talk) 18:22, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  in Sierra Leone too? 
Talk:Danny Brocklehurst

message: Childhood?  Parents?  Education?  Personal life?
Such sections would suggest a biographical article, suitable for an encyclopaedia.
Their absence, combined with a wealth of cv-type material suggests a publicity article.
Does Wikipedia take itself seriously as a would-be encyclopaedia?  Or is it content with an erratically edited collection of material which serves publicity seekers well? 86.149.160.84 (talk) 20:11, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biography?  Or publicity?
Talk:Ahmet Hamdi Boyacıoğlu

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject 
Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article.--KGV  (Talk) 05:28, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Water drum

message: This information doesn't need to be in both the first and second paragraph:
"Water drums are common in Native American music, and in some forms of African and Southeast Asian music." ¶1
&
"Water drums are actually very common in the Native American music and also in some African and Southeast Asian music." ¶2  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ninjawailer (talk • contribs) 17:34, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Duplicate info

message: Perhaps mention the similarities between this and when they fill a bunch of glasses with different amounts of water and hit them or circle the rims with their fingers (I have no idea what this is called. Reference Desk can help you there), both in practice and in the physical workings of the two. Will give you more content. This or a related articles link. -- Floydian τ γ 07:05, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's called a Glass Harmonica, and actually has very little in common with a water drum.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.39.194.5 (talk) 14:28, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: yay  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.164.57.145 (talk) 06:59, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  additional content suggestions
Talk:Danny Webb (actor)

message: Reasonably sure he was in Hummingbird, released as Redemption in the US Jellinator (talk) 04:07, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hummingbird 

message: He starred in the Yes music video. tharsaile (talk) 15:10, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Owner of a Lonely Heart
Talk:Kurapika

message: Made a mistake in last edit summary, should have said first, second and fourth arcs. 83.71.96.175 (talk) 12:11, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You can hem and haw about how you think this or that time Kurapika behaved girl-like all you want, the fact remains he is completely flat chested, and refers to himself as a male after removing the disguise when capturing Kuroro. He's even topless on the cover of Volume 14. "But wait", you say, "He could be binding his chest or taking hormones or have had plastic surgery!" Yes, and Leorio could be too, hell he could be a secret second survivor of Kurapika's clan. Anything's possible, but you have no good reason to think so. -Zyrxil (talk) 23:07, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Summary

message: Why you think that he is a girl ?
Courtesy isn't only for girls. Or maybe you don't like that he is so cute.
You think that there is a girl that can fight Ubogine and win ? If you think so why can't be a boy with that cuteness?
Probably you don't understand why he hit Leorio that time, you like to see someone naked ?
Don't need a proof to know that he is a boy, this is clear from his appearance.
But if you want a proof see epizode 49, Vezze said:"All men who are kissed by me will become my slave". And Kurapika said that time :"Thank God she didn't kiss me"
It means that he is a man. --A.ouerfelli (talk) 19:29, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Kurapika's had his shirt off in both the comic and the TV show. In the guide, he's listed as male as well.-Mr. Toto (talk) 15:26, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Girl? 

message: After talking with Roxas255 I readded the image. At the time it wasn't clear why the image was changed (lack of good edit summary). The current image in the infobox is to reflect how Kurapkia normally looks and the former pic was moved to another section more relevent on what he looks like when his eyes change color.陣内Jinnai 22:35, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: If that's the goal, then the image should be changed yet again. The old image (which I added) was with Kurapika's eyes red under black contacts, so you don't really see the red. -Zyrxil (talk) 16:21, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: If that's how he commonly looks, then yes, that should be the goal. Do you have a link to that file (we can't post the image itself on the talk page) to compare. I would also prefer it be from the original work, the manga, in color if possible. I don't know if that was the case for your image.陣内Jinnai 19:55, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Main image
Template talk:St. Louis Cardinals

message: I'm deleting the list of every season in a hideable box.  It's not of any substance because only two seasons even have articles.  Besides there is already a link the the list of season-by-season results, its redundant.Timpcrk87 23:21, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Inclusion on Seasons list

message: I like the new look of this template much more than the old one. I think all of the team templates should be changed to resemble the look of this one.   jj137 (Talk) 22:16, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment 

message: Why is Busch Stadium in bold?Topgun530 (talk) 15:43, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Busch

message: I added details about the end of the Curse of the Bambino because the Cardinals fell victim to it. It was on their field that the Red Sox won the 2004 World Series, not at Fenway Park. -- SNIyer12, (talk), 21:38, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'ts not a part of Cardinals culture/lore—the Cardinals and their fans have never talked about this "curse" as part of their history. If the Cubs should ever chance to beat the Bosox in a World Series, that won't suddenly make the Curse of the Billy Goat part of Red Sox culture/lore, will it? Deor (talk) 20:25, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Death of the Curse of the Bambino is part of Cardinals history. The Red Sox beat the Cardinals when they won the World Series and Busch Stadium is where they won it. -- SNIyer12, (talk), 02:19, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: You keep saying that, but it's still completely wrong. And the template doesn't say "history"; it says "culture/lore". And don't alter my comments again. Deor (talk) 02:33, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Curse of the Bambino
Talk:Are You Scared?

message: This film is terrible, The acting is poor, The plot is poor, The effects are poor its just rubbish.
Yeah, it's like a really bad copy of Saw... 201.205.238.34 (talk) 14:02, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: How good the movie is has nothing to do with whether or not the movie should be included in "the" wikipedia. What is relevant, however, is that the article badly needs a rewrite.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by The Gazel Ministry (talk • contribs) 19:11, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I suspect the author of the original comment was suggesting his comment shouldn't really go in "the wikipedia" article because it is OR, not that the article shouldn't exist on wikipedia.--86.8.252.7 (talk) 09:38, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not really something that should go in the wikipedia but! 

message: I thought the killer was the Shadow Man?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.215.38.3 (talk) 17:15, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tetris? 

message: 1) A cursory internet search returns IMDB and other unaccaptable 2ndary sources, with #1 and #2 in the search being IMDB and the films own website. Rotten Tomatoes does not show any print or electronic reviews of a professional nature. 
2) The IMDB reference and others do not meet notability guidelines per WP:NOTFLLM
3) There is no  full-length featured newspaper articles from large circulation newspapers or full-length magazine reviews and criticism reviewing the film.
4) The film appears not to be widely distributed in the US and it has not received full length reviews by two or more nationally known critics. 
5) The film is not historically notable.
6) The film was is not considered notable by a broad survey of film critics, academics, or movie professionals. 
7) The film has not bee featured as part of a documentary, program, or retrospective on the history of cinema. 
8) The film has not received a major award for excellence in some aspect of filmmaking.
9) The film has not been selected for preservation in a national archive.
10) As far as a internet search is concerned, the film is not "taught" as a subject at an accredited university or college with a notable film program. 
11) The film does not represent a unique accomplishment in cinema, a milestone in the development of film art, or contributes significantly to the development of United States cinema. 
12) No notable actors or directors
I beleive this film should be given a prod tag. It does not meet notability requirements of WP:NOTFLLM and should be nominated for deletion. Barton Foley (talk) 17:47, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: Is this a remake of Kolobos? Seems similar.
--24.94.251.190 (talk) 06:47, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  remake
Talk:Dave Berry (presenter)

message: Appeared on The Weakest Link 6th Jan 2024 BBC1. Percy2345 (talk) 20:05, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Weakest Link
Talk:Dave Pasch

message: Another editor deleted a passage that referenced Pasch's statement that he did not believe in evolution, saying that such views had nothing to do with his play-by-play work.  While that's true, it's not a reason to delete relevant info, and you don't have to go very far to see other examples of this type of info being included in articles about notable sportscasters, such as Keith Law and Curt Schilling. The statement was also made during his play-by-play duties on ESPN, so it's certainly not like anyone had to go digging for info on his creationist views - he publicly espoused them while doing his job as a sportscaster. Rockypedia (talk) 19:06, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Background info and views on evolution
Talk:The Real Testament

message: 100 Years:
I think the article should mention something about the criticisms of this song. Just count how many times he uses that racial slurr, and he appears to be against when african americans are put in jail for doing a crime. 
Makes absolutely no sense and the YouTube video had comments and video responses claiming how racist this video was and I feel people should know about it. The article mentions nothing about the repetitive use of that slurr.. nothing!
:YouTube user comments are not considered a reliable source on Wikipedia. If you could locate a reliable secondary source , it would then be appropriate to include such criticism in the article. Beeblbrox (talk) 16:56, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intolerant and Racist 

message: He’s my real baby daddy so “SNAP CHAT DAT PUSSY DUDE” #TalkToMeNice 32.212.78.136 (talk) 20:58, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bugga Boo 

message: I need a babysitter!!! 32.212.78.136 (talk) 20:59, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plies Wifey
Talk:Erastus of Corinth

message: This is the first article I have attempted to edit, so any feedback would be greatly appreciated.  Thank-you.  And if I haven't done things correctly, I apologise in advance.  baby_ifritah 06:57, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note 

message: I have provided a source for the translation of Erastus' job description "director of public works".  The translations I have for the original greek are chamberlain / governor / steward / manager / treasurer but these are existing bible translations, i believe, so if anyone is a scholar of greek language or greek history and can provide further information on what his job actually was that would be helpful.  In some bible commentaries Erastus is mentioned as being of a high position, which makes his inclusion noteworthy, so an extension of the translation issues here would be helpful. baby_ifritah 06:54, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Erastus' job description 

message: Does this require a citation?  Some discussion of the likelihood of these references being related might be worthwhile. baby_ifritah 04:33, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added - "It is not certain if these verses all refer to the one person." 

message: I have included a reference to the debate regarding the relevance of this inscription.  If anyone has access to the full source rather than just the abstract I believe that would be useful. baby_ifritah 06:56, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extension of info on Erastus Inscription 

message: The original stub lacked any citations, so I have added what I could.  If there are any problems with the formatting, please feel free to correct them. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Baby ifritah (talk • contribs) 07:00, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I updated the citations and reformatted a little bit. ReformedArsenal (talk) 14:47, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations
Talk:David Eigenberg

message: Hi there! Just wanted to let you know that this actor was in season 1 of justified 2600:4040:26F4:FB00:E984:35BC:D3C8:77CC (talk) 10:21, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Actor was in season 1 of Justified 

message: Just saw an episode of the Cosby Show. He was in it. Not listed in filmography. 2603:7000:D100:1EFC:EC45:BA16:E4A8:2929 (talk) 18:11, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  David Eigenberg
Talk:Crockett Johnson

message: There were in fact six Barnaby reprint paperbacks published by Ballantine in the mid-1980's. See Barnaby and the external link from that article (inadmissible OR: I've personally seen copies, a relative owns them). The next time I can I will add the titles to the listing. Newyorkbrad 02:34, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Newyorkbrad 19:44, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In the section on children's books, it lists four books on which he collaborated with his wife, Ruth Krauss. But then in the next paragraph, it lists three Harold books which they also worked on together. The construction of these two paragraphs seems awkward and confusing. 100.37.179.177 (talk) 00:41, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of Children's Books
Talk:David Gorcey

message: Mostly obits; still:
* "David Gorcey Dies at 63 (AP)
* "Dead End Kid David Gorcey Dies at 63 (UPI)
*Child star Gorcey to be remembered 
* Book: Hollywood's Made-To-Order Punks: The Dead End Kids, Little Tough Guys, East Side Kids and the Bowery Boys
* Book: Me and the Dead End Kid, Leo Gorcey, Jr., Spirit of Hope Publishing, 2003.
-- John Broughton   (♫♫) 01:47, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good sources
Talk:David Holmes (actor)

message: i fixed the spelling error from "paralysed" to "paralyzed". please do not undo this edit because its very important  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.233.160.59 (talk) 23:59, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  spelling error 

message: hey there's no news about how bad his injury is. where did the stuff about him getting paralysed come from? Limey26 (talk) 16:42, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  injury 

message: I am going to delete what is said in the article abut Daniel Radcliffe's angry outburst to his stunt double, as other than on Wikipedia there is absolutely no evidence of this ever having occurred.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wilks228 (talk • contribs) 19:06, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Radcliffe's Reaction 

message: In the 'Career' section it says that he was incorrectly listed in the film credits as playing Adrian Pucey, and in the 'Filmography - Acting section', it again lists him as playing Adrian Pucey. So we have a bit of neat ambiguity.
Its true that he was credited as playing Adrian Pucey, so it ought to be listed in his credits, but we also know that he didn't play Adrian Pucey.
Should wikipedia accurately list his credits or accurately list the roles he has played? It can't be both. Illandancient (talk) 10:04, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Wikipedia should determine which role is accurate and change the sections to match. Currently the sections contradict themselves. pmarm@msn.com (talk) 21:12, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in the credit list