lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Alan Wilson (musician)

message: When I first edited/started this article,  I didn't link it to the proper stub cathegories.... actually I don't like to complete articles by myself, it's more interesting if other users do that on my behalf. Anyway, Alan Wilson played guitar and harmonica, therefore I'm labelling the article again as a stub-musician
Brian W 00:33, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Anyone? Also, here's a great project for someone to upgrade. I'll take a swing at it myself in coming months if no one steps up. Jusdafax 09:38, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo needed, and upgrade

message: How can a musician have his "very own website" when said musician is dead? He can have a website devoted to his music, but it's not his. Parts of this article read like blathering fandom. Articles like this need to be written from a neutral point of view, detached from the subject. This is an encyclopedia, not a fanzine. 
Oh, and "very"? "Very" is the most useless word in the English language. If something is your "very own," it's your own. 71.92.98.115 (talk) 18:44, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Very own website? 

message: Crickets. Quiet around here and I notice it has been that way for some time. The article is still listed as start-class on the WikiProject article quality grading scale. It would be nice to see some editing progress made towards improving Alan's article. I have made some attempts to beef up the references, novice editor that I am. Maybe that boxed notice from 2009 can be taken down eventually?
Candsastles1 (talk) 02:15, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Anyone interested in helping to build on the information and overall quality here?

message: The article says, "Although Canned Heat's performance was cut from the original theatrical release of the Woodstock film, they were featured in the 25th anniversary 'Director's Cut'. The exception was Going Up the Country, which was featured in the opening credits of the original Woodstock film." This may be referenced, but it is incorrect. Going Up the Country was played early in the film (not during the credits), but it was the studio version, not the Woodstock performance. The Woodstock performance of Going Up the Country was, however, included on the Woodstock album.  86.44.192.221 (talk) 08:44, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Woodstock film 

message: I think Henry Thomas wrote and performed Going up the Country in 1920. Check out YouTube. 2603:6081:6340:8820:8848:1AFF:FEF3:4C8B (talk) 02:22, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Going up the country 

message: Too much of this article is based on two books and one article that are somewhat controversial-the Davis book, the Fito book and the Bell article. 165.117.223.124 (talk) 21:28, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:Osmosis Jones:

message: Too many intralinks; also incomplete.  Please remedy this. --HubHikari 00:36, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

message: Nearly every word is an intralink.Billy Bishop 00:40, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beyond Repair 

message: Much of this article is in small text. As there seems to be no reason for this to be so (beyond an in joke) I'm going to take it out. Emmett5 02:10, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Small text
Talk:Walking City

message: Shouldn't that be 176 days (two years)? —Tamfang (talk) 06:05, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: In 2312_(novel), Robinson quotes 177 days for the circumnavigation.  In Blue Mars, I can only find reference to the 88 day year and the 59 day rotation period implying a long solar day.  Definitely not an 88 day solar day. 96.239.226.24 (talk) 14:18, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mercury 

message: Wasn't the town Atlantis in Star Gate: Atlantis also able to move? I didn't follow the series closely enough to remember all details. Perhaps someone else does?
192.109.140.196 (talk) 06:46, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fiction 

message: How does such a gigantic moving city walk all over the world without seriously pissing people off by trampling all over their crops, roads, infrastructure, leaving behind permanent damage from their "feet" or tracks? (Not to mention simply being really annoying; people dislike wind-turbines and cell towers enough. I doubt they'd like the idea of miles-wide metropolises trampling the countryside.) I suppose the guy who came up with the idea assumes that EVERYONE in the world will live in these cities by that point? What about crops? The natural world (if any remains)? Water crossings? Seems generally implausible to me. You'd have to not only find a clean, renewable source to feed humans appetites, but you'd then also have to find some way to power a few millions tons of self-propelled city as well. I doubt one would get the greatest MPG's out of something like that. If you really want moving cities, a big rail network would work better. Ocean-based ones would probably be the most ideal (until the first really big hurricane). Personally, I don't have any intentions of living in a city at any point, mobile or not..45Colt 08:06, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Practical details
Talk:The Absent-Minded Beggar

message: This article is listed as a GA, but it has no lead section.  GA articles are supposed to meet WP:LEAD.  I'll hold off on delisting until someone can take a look and perhaps fix the problem.  Mike Christie (talk) 12:06, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I prettied it up a bit.  Any other comments?  -- Ssilvers 13:53, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Dang, that was quick.  Nice work.  That certainly looks nicer, and addresses my concern.  If I get a chance I'll take a look and come up with other questions; if not, it's because I'm impressed.  Thanks.  Mike Christie (talk) 13:57, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA issues 

message: An editor suggested removing the lyrics, since they are available on Wikisource.  I think we should keep them in the article.  They are public domain, and they are wikilinked and footnoted (and illustrated with a contemporary image).  Wikisource is nice, but for the casual reader of Wikipedia, it is far more convenient to display them right in the article.  -- Ssilvers (talk) 19:10, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Mmmh... yes and no. I think this is sufficiently large that they unbalance the whole thing; we end up with a poem with an introduction, if you see what I mean. Perhaps just the first stanza, and a prominent link through to the full text? Shimgray | talk | 19:25, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with Ssilvers. The point about including the words in the article is that the article is put in context by quoting them. It's not as though the words were very long. In the case of many other lyrics this would not be so important, but without the words immediately before one this article would lose much of its impact. If the words were unavailable (e.g. because in copyright) so be it, but as they are not it would be silly to limit ourselves and weaken this article. Tim riley (talk) 19:36, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

text: It's definitely the images, but I can't figure out how to get rid of it without removing them entirely. Shimgray | talk | 20:04, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

text: Ha!  I see that you understand the HTML better than I do.  Feel free to increase width or max-width even more if it looks better.  All the best, -- Ssilvers (talk) 21:13, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Loud applause to both - this looks really spot on. Tim riley (talk) 09:10, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Lyrics
Talk:Brian McClennan

message: I oppose deletion. It does need to be cleaned up and sources added but this can be done rather then simply deleting it. - Shudda talk 00:40, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If you oppose the deletion, feel free to remove the "dated prod" notice in the article, which will stop the deletion process.  Of course, make sure the person is clearly notable according to WP:BIO and that the article makes that clear, because if someone still thinks it should be deleted, it will likely by sent to WP:AFD for consensus about its possible deletion. NickelShoe (Talk) 02:21, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion 
Talk:Shap

message: This link was added to the article after discussion on the WP Reliable Sources Noticeboard. See: WP:RSN exercise. No information from the CCHT link has been put into the body of the article in the form of citations because it has not yet been verified for 100% accuracy by the Victoria County History project for Cumbria. (This will take some years to do).  Laplacemat (talk) 12:51, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  CCHT external link
Talk:I'm Gonna Be An Angel!

message: Mention is made of a manga, but no information is given. Who was the mangaka, dates, # of vol, etc is needed. CFLeon (talk) 00:21, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: http://www.mangaupdates.com/series.html?id=6887 184.65.77.230 (talk) 20:50, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Manga Info??
Talk:Ojamajo Doremi Dokkān

message: What was in the "henshin bottle", perfume or mouthwash? What was that meant to be? 71.111.232.40 16:07, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Perfume or mouthwash 

message: i know who that boy is at the end, and i posted it on the article.
before i saw the end of dookan i knew doremi would meet the boy on the beach.i also thought i would be in the daytime.i even knew the boy's hairstyle and i thought doremi would be rearing a lavender dress with long ponytails.
Sir aaron sama girl 20:53, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: boy at the end

message: So, pretty much you're assuming that, because one person on Youtube said it was Igarashi, that it's an official fact? ~FushiChi
well i belive it before i saw that person's coment, and a lot of times charicters can disapear off the shows (written out) and reapear at the last episode, so i belive it's iragashi sempai, it can't be Yada Masaru, can it? and plus irigashi appears and disapears a lot.
Sir aaron sama girl 22:59, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: the boy

message: im confused, it it:
dokkan, dokaan, or do~kkan
is it:
motto,mooto,or mo~tto?
Sir aaron sama girl 22:59, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: season names

message: i'm starting to think that Yada and Hasebe like doremi, but no, this isn't a well known fact, but  Kotake likes doremi
Sir aaron sama girl 23:25, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kotake 

message: it looks like doremi likes yada, telling by the boy's hair style.
Sir aaron sama girl 22:02, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: the boy, part 2
Talk:List of Ojamajo Doremi Na-i-sho episodes

message: Can you make a Naisho episode list with details? I want to know what's Non-Chan's last name. Felix 20:49, 18 July 2006
I don't know if I can, since I haven't watched all of them. I've only watched a few.--Loulou Segawa 14:23, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Episodes
Talk:List of Ojamajo Doremi Sharp episodes

message: your welcome for uploading a ojamajo doremi sharp image. 
this article really needed one.
Sir aaron sama girl 16:39, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think that's a DVD cover...  It doesn't look like one...  Do you have any proof that it is? --DarkAdonis255 14:27, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: needy image

message: There is no image here!! Someone load one, please? -Anime27  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Anime27 (talk • contribs) 13:43, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image again
Talk:Rizelmine

message: Did Rizel and Iwaki get married? I was under the impression that they would marry when they got older because of the line "It'll be in the far future, but let's go together to register it this time." when Iwaki gave Rizel the marriage form.(quote from a fansubbed episode, by Honobono, I think?) In the ending credits they had them as 1 year later but they did not say anything about them being married. (Unless this happens in the manga and not the anime series, which I did not happen to read?)--Amarei 00:11, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A lot of anime series don't complete what the manga does. Tyciol (talk) 05:37, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Marriage

message: I've been trying to fix this up a bit. What do you think? Hikari Tajiri (talk) 17:49, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks great! For someone just finding out about this series, it is a great guide. I wonder where to find the second season mostly :) Tyciol (talk) 05:37, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Fixing it up

message: * ANN: ,  , Manga
*THEM Anime: 
*Mania.com: Manga
::The review of the manga in the ANN Right Turn Only column is not a professional review, but a review sent in by a reader of the column.  While the author of the column probably screens the reader reviews for some level of competent writing, I do not think a review by a non-professional counts as a reliable source.  I've therefore removed that review as a source in the article. Calathan (talk) 00:35, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review(s)
Talk:Paul Koretz

message: To whoever copied these segments that I had to delete for clear bias and lack of citations, they are literally directly from his campaign site.
This breaks wikipedia's rules on requiring a "Neutral point of view" and "citations are generally required".
Please read wikipedia's rules and guidelines before writing. 
Proof:
Thank you,
Kylerschin (talk) 22:12, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Please stop copying directly from Paul Koretz's campaign page.

message: how do i flag this as a biased article?  do i have to create an account to do that?  the article looks like it was written by koretz himself, hardly an objective, balanced look at a politician that may be in some ways in step with his district, but who is off the charts left by the standards of the average american (e.g., he is introducing a bill to impeach pres. bush in the CA assembly).
Can the author take Koretz's cock out of their mouth long enough to write something neutral and NPOV?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.149.143.200 (talk) 08:36, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Research and Analysis Center

message: Wikipedia Editors,
TRADOC Analysis Center changed its name in to The Research and Analysis Center (TRAC) when the organization became a Direct Reporting Unit to the Army Futures Command. The newly created TRAC Communiations Team kindly requests your assistance in changing the title of the page to United States The Research and Analysis Center. 
Thank you.
V/r,
Diana Hanley Analysta 101 (talk) 16:16, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request to Change Page Title
Talk:.hack//XXXX

message: :.hack//Xxxx → .hack//XXXX — This was moved like 2 years ago, citing Talk:.hack//Sign/Archive_1#.hack.2F.2FSIGN_.E2.86.92_.hack.2F.2FSign, which I have no issue with at all. However, in this case, since "XXXX", the trademarked name, isn't a real word (like Sign vs. SIGN was), the same reasoning doesn't apply. Thoughts? Axem Titanium (talk) 19:41, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:Phylum Monsters

message: A 1-line listing in an index is not a review. Dust-jacket promotional copy is not a review. A review explains and explores the theme of the book, talks about influences that the book has and would have on other books, and generally is more than 2 paragraphs long. A review is not a plot summary teaser. It also helps if the "reviewer" can spell, use English correctly, and has *read the book*. 
Anyone reading "Phylum Monsters" would immediately be struck by the parody of the automobile industry represented by the Big 7 creches, and would muse on the dehumanization represented by turning human beings into the produce of mass-marketing. And the failures described in the book are reminescent of the massive recall campaigns by the auto makers.  This is glaringly obvious and yet none of the "reviews" I've seen so far talk about this. And no, you can't use *this* paragraph in defense of notability because its on the Wikipedia which does not consider itself a reliable source; it's also "original thought" (in the Wikipedia sense of the term). --Wtshymanski (talk) 14:27, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: What is a review?

message: Sigh, I had hoped to stay out of this, since my interest in WP is about 00.0001 percent.  But someone drew my attention to this and I thought I would take 20 seconds to set the record straight.  Years ago, when I was a prolific WP contributor, under my own name, of course, unlike 99.9% of the vandals and jackals who constitute the main element of contributors here, I did write what I thought were NPOV and straightforward articles about two of my earlier books.  I was just about to start one about Phylum Monsters when some geniuses came up with an "improved" template that they were urging people to use to fit in *all* articles about novels.  There were, if I recall, about ten Headers, under which we were supposed to put in the appropriate material.  The first header was Explain the title.  So I started the article by filling out the first header.  Hence the blurb-like material still lurking there.  Having done that, I then lost interest, permanently, in WP and departed for Citizendium, where life has been vandal- and cretin-free, as well as being stress-free: you ought to try the experience -- you will no longer cringe when the thingee at the top of the page tells you that a new message has been sent to your Talk page.... Hayford Peirce (talk) 00:09, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the headers. And hear, hear, viva el Zendium! Rothorpe (talk) 00:56, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: PS -- I forgot to say above that I personally don't give a hoot about whether the article is deleted or not. As in most things about WP, my attitude is "N'importe quoi!" Hayford Peirce (talk) 19:36, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: A word from the author
Talk:Dragon Ball GT: A Hero's Legacy

message: the goku jr article is pretty much just a plot summary of this movie. Plough | talk to me 22:51, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Why? That's bascially the same as saying Goku should be merged with Dragon Ball Z.--KojiDude (viva la BAM!) 23:11, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I would oppose the Merge if the article is re-written. I agree with Plough, the article does seem more like a summary of the movie rather than a brief history of the character. -- bulletproof 3:16 23:18, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, the article should be redone.--Suit-n-tie 02:27, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with Bulletproof and Suit-n-tie. We should re-write it and if it doesn't turn out that well, than just merge it. I personally don't care much for Goku Jr. and see him as a minor character, but I'll try to help. Sasuke-kun27 22:09, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, because really, the Goku Jr. article is just one long movie summary.--Suit-n-tieTalk About The Suit  03:48, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge goku jr into this article
Talk:AD Police Files

message: What's the length of AD police Files 1-3 Region 2? Mine has 100mins on the back. Yet on sites its 140mins.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.146.160.220 (talk) 13:36, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Length of DVD??
Talk:Eric Gregg

message: I have rewritten this article adding sections and removed unsourced comments that contravened our policy for living persons. I have also added his AP obituary. The article also badly needs sourcing. Capitalistroadster 00:55, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Fountain of Lamneth

message: I suggest that this article be merged into Caress of Steel, seeing as it it rather short and is a component of that album.
You say 1 of 3 epic songs, what about 2112 (being the most popular one of the epics done by Rush) and The Necromancer?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.3.133.197 (talk) 20:11, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Chen Yuanyuan

message: This article sounds like recounting of folklore and legend rather than historical fact (as close to fact as possible).
The article is a summary of her story as portrayed in the Chinese Historical Drama (not documentary) Jiangshan Fengyuqing (江山风雨情) which is referred to in the Wu_Sangui article.
Is there any academic evidence that she is even a real historical figure? a quick search on google reveals sparse bits of folklorish on her. And i agree, this article is clearly based off of a television drama, as are many other articles relating to the fall of the Ming Dynasty. 66.41.62.136 02:15, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm doing POV tag cleanup. Whenever an POV tag is placed, it is necessary to also post a message in the discussion section stating clearly why it is thought the article does not comply with POV guidelines, and suggestions for how to improve it. This permits discussion and consensus among editors. This is a drive-by tag, which is discouraged in WP, and it shall be removed. Future tags should have discussion posted as to why the tag was placed, and how the topic might be improved. Better yet, edit the topic yourself with the improvements. This statement is not a judgement of content, it is only a cleanup of frivolously and/or arbitrarily placed tags. No discussion, no tag.Jjdon (talk) 17:51, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV Tag 

message: Chen Yuan Yuan was a real historical figure.  She was a concubine of Wu Sangui who was raped upon entry of Li Zhi Chen's army into Beijing (some sources state that Li himself took possession of her but I don't know if this is actual historical fact).  Consequently Wu opened the gates of Fort Shan Hai to the Manchus.  Historical record do not have a definitive account of her later whereabouts or disposition after the fall of Beijing to Li's army.
From the Chinese Wikipedia: http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E9%99%B3%E5%9C%93%E5%9C%93  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.215.159.156 (talk) 08:17, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is incorrect. 

message: In the Wu Sangui article, it says he made the decision to open the gates of the Great Wall after Li kidnapped Chen upon taking Beijing.  This is also mentioned by the commenter above.  If this is true, it should be in the article, if not it should be deleted from the Wu Sangui article. 24.42.68.193 (talk) 15:28, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Li Zicheng connection?
Talk:USS North Carolina (BB-55)

message: Does any one know why or how the USS North Carolina's rudder was damaged and required repair at pearl harbor on April 31 1944? A 10 fireplane (talk) 17:59, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: According to her War Diary for May 1944, BB-55's rudders were inspected by divers on 4 May at Majuro Harbour with both rudders in need of maintenance, being badly corroded. The rudders were repaired from 20-23 May 1944 at Pearl Harbour.Damwiki1 (talk) 07:36, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rudder damage