lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Plus fours

message: The origin of the name "plus fours" is given twice in the article. This is repetitious. One or the other should be deleted. I'll leave it to you all to decide. Bill Jefferys 02:17, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of name given twice in the article 

message: The article implies that they have more freedom of movement BECAUSE they are longer than knickerbockers.  That makes no sense.
Do they just happen to be LOOSER or something, and therefore allow more freedom of movement IN SPITE OF being longer?  Or is that simply a typo there for "...LESS freedom of movement"?
Someone pls clarify and/or reword that section!  TX. 209.172.23.180 (talk) 03:51, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  freedom of movement 

message: The article title lacks the hyphen but the article itself consistently uses it.  Consensus? 184.56.176.127 (talk) 15:03, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: None of the sources use a hyphen so I have removed it from the text. Mabalu (talk) 20:32, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hyphen or no? 

message: ::In Vladimir Nabokov's King, Queen, Knave, "while his lover is dying of pneumonia in a nearby hospital attended by her husband (his employer and uncle), Franz busies himself arranging to buy a pair of plus fours, a long-deferred dream".[This quote needs a citation]
Why does this need a citation? It is clearly labeled as a quote from a well-known literary work, title and author given. I am removing the citation needed tag. Somebody slap my hand if I am in error, but do, please, explain why. rowley (talk) 16:04, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this the work of a robot?
File talk:World map worlds first second third.GIF

message: How exactely is South Africa a developed nation? The vast majority of the country's population is impoverished-It's GPD per capita is lower than that of Russia, Mexico or Botswana. I doubt that there are any source for calling South Africa a "first-world nation." Regards, Signaturebrendel 16:31, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Gesta principum Polonorum

message: This article is in need of cleanup. Necessary words are missing, sentences are unnecessarily short (telegram style), the grammar needs fixing in some places, etcetera. Cows fly kites (Aecis) Rule/Contributions 16:32, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: The article was recently moved from the full latin name, Cronicae et gesta ducum sive principum Polonorum, to Gesta principum Polonorum, with the move summary most recognizable in English, as the name of the only English edition of the text. I am not arguing for the old name, as I prefer names that are more easily typeable. But if we want a short name that is used in English, I think Chronica Polonorum is better (compare: 500 hits on GPrint for "Chronica Polonorum" Polish to 24 hits for "Gesta principum Polonorum" Polish. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  18:12, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The thing is that, although Chronica Polonorum is used to refer to this work, it refers to numerous works (you can see that from the gb search).It probably doesn't have primary usage, but judging by gb its primary usage would be the Miechowita work. The strength of Gesta principum Polonorum is that this is the name of it's only English edition, so this will be the primary way of referring to it in English context in the years post-dating its publication (and probably will be the name this article's most likely audience--history or literature undergraduates-- will know from bibliographies). Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 18:46, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

text: To revisit this 4 years later, I think Chronica Polonorum is usually used for Kadlubek's chronicle.Volunteer Marek 04:06, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:International Panel of ICC Umpires

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :ICC International umpire panel and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 24#ICC International umpire panel until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Sony R (talk) 12:46, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "ICC International umpire panel" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Hi-Tops (film)

message: Was this made available to a wide audience?  WAVY 10 15:47, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Availability 
Talk:Richard Newman (English cricketer)

message: Would there be any objection to moving this article to Richard Newman (18th-century cricketer)? Since 18th and century are working together as a compound adjective before the noun cricketer, it should be hyphenated. Richard Newman (18th century cricketer) would remain as a redirect to the new title. If there's a consensus, or at least no objection, I'll make the move in about a week. Thank you. SchreiberBike (talk) 21:18, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''(18th century cricketer)'' to ''(18th-century cricketer)''
Talk:Richard Parks

message: this page is awful! the box clearly doesnt show anything about his wales caps which are stated later on in the page, or any of his clubs bar the dragons. absolutely awful page 82.11.243.165 (talk) 10:59, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: If you know him or not, we go by what Reliable Sources(WP:RS) say about him for stuff like this, rather than unverifiable stuff that cannot be independently confirmed that only friends would know. -Roxy, the PROD. . wooF 23:28, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  someone sort it!
Talk:Richard Stromback

message: Suspect that the following accounts have a COI in editing this biography:  User:Dfraser44, User:Rstromback, User:68.42.222.214, User:Autumn1978, User:Scratchdesign, and User:122.163.103.95. 2001:558:1400:10:F9BE:3D3:B553:A4FF (talk) 16:27, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict of Interest 

message: Can citation please be included for any material that is added going forward? Thank you, --Malerooster (talk) 13:09, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced, non notable, material 
Talk:Richard Webster (rugby)

message: Not 100% sure on this though. CorleoneSerpicoMontana (talk) 23:49, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Looking through, he played league as well, isn't the move giving undue credence to his time spent playing union.Londo06 15:52, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This has moved from (rugby player) to (rugby) and is something that we may need to look at specifically at the community rather than as previously done on individual player pages.Londo06 15:53, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Page move

message: Turns out Webster didn't make any actual appearances at the 1995 Rugby League World Cup (Andrews, ABC of Rugby League) so he won't qualify on that basis. Is there evidence he made any other representative RL appearances for Wales/GB ? -Sticks66 07:46, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Guess I'll remove him from the List of dual-code rugby internationals. -Sticks66 06:56, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Webster as dual-code international
Talk:Hatton, London

message: The water table is so high that a pond was sustained at the junction of Green Man lane and Faggs Road until the mid 19th Century, negating the ability to have any tunnels in the area, in fact the local pub's cellar is at floor level for this very reason.
:The local pub shows a window into one of these supposed tunnels next to the fire place, when in fact this is a natural air vent to prevent the wood from rotting.
I removed the above from the article as it seemed written like a conversation. MRSC • Talk 09:34, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed
Talk:C.C. Lockwood

message: Talk:CC Lockwood
Hello,
In regards to the copyright violation with the page I listed entitled CC Lockwood I would like to inform you that I do have premission to repost that bibilography. Please let me know what i need to do in regards of getting the page published.
Thank you,
Jennipher Fullerton
yippieyay@aol.comYIPPIEYAY 16:55, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:AGV (helmet manufacturer)

message: There was section in the article on "milestones in the history of AGV helmets". This entire section was a word-for-word copy/paste of the . Wikipedia does not allow copyright violations as they can result in legal proceedings, so I removed it. See Wikipedia:Copyright violations for more info. However, a source of information on AGV's history the page is useful and there is no reason why some of the information on the page should not be paraphrased and summarised in this article. --TimTay (talk) 08:03, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violation 
Talk:Sexuality and the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints

message: I am well-read on the subject of sexuality and the LDS church, and I have never heard of "heterosexuals with non-heterosexual inclinations".  They really don't talk about heterosexuality, but they have talked about a homosexual orientation.  However, they teach it won't continue past this life, but I have never heard that the attractions themselves will be "hopefully overcome" in this life.  They admit it may be a struggle, but they don't say they should be a struggle.  A lot of original research.Joshuajohanson 02:19, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation needed 

message: Is this the right article to include discussion of the church's teachings regarding pornography?  In the last decade, the church has increased its discussion on the subject.  Besides books, pamphlets, and general conference addresses on pornography, the church also maintains addiction aids and counseling specifically for those consuming pornography.  The article already states in the lead paragraph that sexuality's "expression is subject to strict commandments".  Does this fall within the scope of Sexuality and the LDS Church?  ——Rich jj (talk) 11:26, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pornography 

message: This article reads likes it's been written by LDS cult members in the way that it tries to defend itself from being a homophobic organization.  statements expressing that gays are welcome provided that they remain celibate prove this point.  Stop trying to avoid the issue and have the nerve to actually call a spade a spade and say that the Mormon church is a homophobic institution.  Wikipedia needs to rise above this shit and stop pussy-footing around trying to avoid potential law suits from cults.--ЗAНИA talk WB talk] 22:24, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Personal opinions expressing ignorance and prejudice are of no value to Wikipedia. -- 208.81.184.4 (talk) 19:19, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is bollocks
Talk:Chiffon (fabric)

message: A merge with Chiffon (clothing) was suggested in January 2017. There has been no discussion on either talk page, so I decided to go ahead with it. I searched extensively (by google) for references of the use of chiffon in dressmaking in Eritrea but found nothing reliable, so I added a single sentence with a 'citation needed' tag. Leschnei (talk) 01:17, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Chiffon (clothing) 

message: What does "s.th." mean? 173.88.246.138 (talk) 02:33, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "s.th." 

message: Why did someone add Arabic in the opening paragraph, as if this French term derives from Arabic (which, according to Wiktionary, it does not)? Is anyone knowledgeable monitoring this page to prevent misinformation from being added? 173.88.246.138 (talk) 02:34, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't have access to the Arabic source cited, but all my investigation shows the Engish/French word is unrelated to the arabic one but instead comes from proto-indo-european . Either the Arabic comes from French or it is just a co-incidence. Ashmoo (talk) 15:48, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arabic
Talk:Rick Suhr

message: Who ever this person is (registered ip comes back to an Asia Pacific Network Information Centre IP) keeps removing any reference to the remarks the coach made in the 2008 Olympics.  Perhaps they want it to go away, but it did happen and there are sources to site, therefore perfectly reasonable to put in a wiki article.  Can the page be restricted to only logged in people editting it? 70.188.139.30 (talk) 01:10, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm an admin here on Wikipedia, and I can tell you that article does not need semi-protection. Since I'm involved in the content on this article, I wouldn't be the one to do it anyways. The section that is removed does not have any citations. If the section is to be re-added, it should reflect the commentary in  and cite the source. ~MDD4696 02:31, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, discussion is good, I guess that is why I brought it up originally.  The section had been vetted by several other logged in users and the reverting by that IP (twice) without any comment seemed rude/unnecessary to me.  As for citations, reviewing the history, I saw it had a reference, that someone else had put in, and was adequate.  And considering I saw the story on several different outlets, thought it was relevant to an article about the coach.  I'll admit that 'controversy' may have been a bad title.  If someone/you wanted to add to it, siting the source you gave explaining Jen's take on it, I find that more than fair. 70.188.139.30 (talk) 02:05, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

text: I thought the reference in the Controversy section to being a transcript from NBC Sports was sufficient since it doesn't take much searching to confirm the vericity of the transcribed statements.  A direct link to the actual source would have been better.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mwclark4453 (talk • contribs) 12:39, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Drawing conclusions from a transcript is original research, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. We need another source which analyzes the transcript and provides commentary. ~MDD4696 00:34, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

text: What conclusion was drawn from the transcript? --Michael (talk) 23:28, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There were actually two parts of the transcript in question.  One was the dialogue between Rick Suhr and Jenn.  The other part, which analyzes this dialogue, was provided by Tom Hammond and Dwight Stone.  Hammond and Stone provide the commentary and analyze the transcript (coach's remarks).  This seems to be more than original research, and seems to represent what Mdd4696 states is needed: the second source which "analyzes the transcript and provides commentary."  Hammond and Stone were, indeed, the commentators. Missyagogo (talk) 02:23, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  IP: 116.213.104.110 Editing
Talk:Yojijukugo

message: The term 四字熟語 seems to apply only to constructs that are idiomatic in nature, i.e. constructs whose meaning is not readily evident from their composite kanji. But four-character compounds also feature fairly prominent in history (particularly Meiji history) as slogans or concepts, and I wonder if compounds like these, whose meaning is directly inferable from the separate kanji can be called 四字熟語 or if there is another specific term which applies to them.
Some examples of what I'm talking about:
*文明開化 bunmei kaika, "civilization and enlightenment"
*富国強兵, fukoku kyouhei, "rich country, strong army" 
*内憂外患, naiyuu gaikan, "troubles within, threats from without" 
*尊王攘夷, sonnou joui, "revere the Emperor, expel the barbarians"
*和魂洋才, wakon yousai, "Japanese spirit, Western learning"
*王政復古, ousei fukko, "Restoration of Imperial rule''
*明治維新, meiji ishin, "Meiji Restoration" or "Enlightened rule, bringing threads together to make something new"
*殖産興業, shokusan kougyou, "increase production, promote industry"
Four-character compositions are also considered in Japanese (and likely Chinese too) to be poetic and evocative of classical tradition, but these are generally seen simply as fragments (verses) of poetry, not as set phrases, idioms or slogans. Does this concept of the poetic four-character composition have a name? Thanks. LordAmeth 17:27, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Four-character slogans 

message: This comment is now too far separated from its referent to make sense:
Note that 四字熟語 is itself a non-idiomatic four-character phrase.
I suggest that it be moved back into the initial section right after the various meanings of 四字熟語. Robert Munafo (talk) 22:24, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Autological note 

message: I find it *highly* unlikely that 一石二鳥 derives from an "English proverb."  Where is the citation on this?  Yes, there is an English expression with a nearly identical layout, but it seems equally likely that the English got the expression from Asia, or that both got the expression from somewhere else entirely. Amieni (talk) 18:46, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source Citations 

message: The most recent Fire Emblem game (Three Houses) has the Japanese subtitle 風花雪月, or wind, flower, snow, moon. This has the literal reference to the four routes in the game (Verdant Wind, Crimson Flower, Silver Snow, Azure Moon), and I feel could be a worthy addition to the Pop Culture section. A reddit post isn't a great source but this user did provide their own interpretation beyond the literal usage of the characters if anyone feels that would be userful. 35.2.204.199 (talk) 07:11, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pop Culture example: Fire Emblem?
Talk:Kinked demand

message: *Any applicable WikiProject tags?  Smee 17:15, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: tagged Cretog8 (talk) 20:30, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

message: I'm sorry but I started to read this and it makes no sense whatsoever.
I realise that anyone coming here looking for this may know a little about the subject, but surely this could be made a little more reader-friendly for the rest of us?
Georgec2 17:11, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meaning 

message: Are there any suggestions on how this could be made more friendly to the casual reader? 
 
i think it can be made more reader friendly by giving examples such as this type of model applies to FMCG s such as pepsi and lays. . .
Radhika Asrani
BetsyWalls 00:02, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestions? 

message: The quote in the criticism section says:
Stigler also asserts that the model is unnecessary because Chicago theory already included allowances for short-run sticky prices due to collusion, menu costs, and regulatory or bureaucratic inefficiencies in markets
So what is this "Chicago theory"? I couldn't find a WP article about it, but I believe it would benefit the casual reader if more information was available on what it means.
Thanks, 
nyenyec ☎ a casual reader 16:18, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  So what's the "Chicago theory"? 

message: Please correct the quote error in the formatting of the CRITICISM section
G. Robert Shiplett 02:14, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  formatting error 

message: merge Price point into this Kinked demand article. Jonpatterns (talk) 18:03, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge Price point into Kinked demand 

message: The image for this article makes no sense and I'm sure is a mistake. Any ideas on what to replace it with?
Paoshf (talk) 14:28, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image
Talk:Christian Life Movement

message: *Eliminate all non objective things in the article, as "inspired by the holy spirit".--Mariocossio 17:18, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: NON PARTIAL
Talk:Rigan Machado

message: Under the list of people he's trained is listed "Rodney King" with it resolving to "Crazy Monkey Defense".   Is this a joke?   There is no article at "Crazy Monkey Defense".  Perhaps this should be deleted.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZeroXero (talk • contribs) 16:53, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sam Ruben

message: Nobel Prize?
"The discovery of Carbon-14, the most useful of all artificial isotopes and consequent major advances in biology and medicine, failed to result in a deserved Nobel Prize for Ruben and Kamen."
This is an opinion, noting the word "deserved" in particular. Where is the support for this statement? The 1960 Noble prize was awarded to Libby for the _method_ of carbon-14 dating, which Ruben and Kamen did not develop themselves. In addition,  Ruben died in 1943 and so he would not have won a Noble prize under any circumstance for this discovery.
I will give it a few weeks and then would likely delete that last statement completely. I think trying to patch it up will only lead to a sort of debate on the entry page, which is not appropriate. But I will give it the benefit of some more thought before taking action.
24.58.15.86 17:21, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article lacks an introduction.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Astrohoundy (talk • contribs) 03:37, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need to Reorganize
Talk:Riki Wessels

message: Try as I might, I have not been able to find a place called "Marogudoore" in Queensland. Perhaps it should be Maroochydore, Queensland? -- Mattinbgn\talk 22:53, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I wish I could have so much faith in a source even one which is normally spot on. According to Google the only two hits for this place name are CA and here so it looks like an error. I have emailed CA, so watch this space. --Jpeeling (talk) 23:06, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Birth place
Talk:Knight anole

message: It is true that these lizards are aggressive.  They will attack a human if they feel threatened.  I had one chase me, climb up my leg, and attempt to bite my hand, all at high speed.  I had released him to the wild after finding him in my yard.  Their bite can draw blood, and they will not let go once they have latched on. Their claws can also draw blood.  They are able to color themselves to their environment, from very dark brown (almost black), to a light yellow-green.  If there is one in the trees of your area, expect no baby birds, because these lizards will eat the eggs, the chicks, and even fledglings even while a parent bird is defending.  To catch, go for the back of the neck, where neither claws nor teeth can get you. CodeCarpenter 17:24, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Shoei

message: Anyone got any input as to why this is tagged as not neutral and then no evidence supplied?
If no one has any input I'll remove the tag. It doesn't seem like this really has much that could be regarded as opinion. NathanLee (talk) 03:02, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the tag. There's no clear POV problem here that I saw in referencing other helmet manufacturers. --健次(derumi)talk 21:25, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article not neutral?
Talk:Piaggio P.166

message: Sorry for the confusion, I am just checking the build figures I have as they dont add up at the moment. MilborneOne (talk) 18:33, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The 14 DL3s (including derivatives definately doesn't add up - Somilia had 2 utility and two /MAR, the Italian Air Force had six /APH, the Italian Foreign Ministry had two utility aircraft for humanitarian work in Somalia, the Italian coast guard had 12 new build SEMs, the the GdF having a further 10 new build /SEMs and 2 ex-Alitalia utility aircraft - this makes at least 36.Nigel Ish (talk) 18:55, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

text: Thanks it looks like the type was still in production when my source was written so your 36 looks about right.   
*I-PIAC and I-PIAE are the two Alitalia
*60-SBI to 60-SBL are the four Somali
*MM25153 to MM25158 are the six APHs
*MM25159 to MM25170 are the 12 SEM1s
*MM25173 to MM25182 are the 10 SEM2s
*Also quoted are MM25183 and MM25184 appear to be straight DL3s which gives 36.
Tried to make up an production list but the sources differ between the msns and the build nos for DL3s. One example is Build 121 appears to be msn 472 MM25153 (an APH) but 472 is also given for MM25183, scramble also says that Build 121 is actually MSN 475 etc., MilborneOne (talk) 20:59, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Numbers built