lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Dallas Marathon

message: Does anyone have a source to historical women's winners?
This article could be fleshed out in many ways, including adding sections about the various additional races, what this race served as for qualifying in any given year, charity for each year, management for each year, course for each year, and so much more.  davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 21:27, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Need women's winners prior to 1996

message: As @Dying noted in December 2020, there's a discrepancy between whether the Galveston Mardi Gras Marathon is in fact older than the Dallas Marathon. This CBS News article refers to Dallas as "the longest-running marathon in Texas," but this table has results going back to 1969 for Galveston. (While the name on the spreadsheet is Galveston Mardi Gras Marathon and the current marathon is simply Galveston Marathon, the results match up.) Should we go with the reliable source with CBS, go with the spreadsheet and say something along the lines of "the Dallas Marathon is one of the oldest marathons in Texas," explicitly mention the discrepancy, or something else? I'm inclined towards saying Dallas is one of the oldest marathons in Texas, possibly adding "along with the Galveston Marathon", then citing both CBS and the spreadsheet. Fuchsia the Sun (talk) 13:08, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oldest marathon citation needed
Talk:Andy Goldstein

message: Andy Goldstein is a ******* ****. (source UN)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.41.93.196 (talk) 10:45, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  TalkSport 

message: Hey Andy 
I’m a Halifax boy 
Live in Orlando Florida 
Played in Yorkshire league Vs Leeds Huddersfield 
Bradford etc pre season 
Don’t need to talk about myself 
Played decently here against the rowdies etc 
But watched Halifax vs Man U 1971 at the Shay 
Watneycup 
Manu forward line I believe was best morgan Charlton 
2-1 Halifax town !
I was there 
First big game Leeds west ham 67 ?
Watched game today at work in Orlando 
Tyler Adam’s brilliant 
Billy Bremner ?
I believe great discussion 2603:9001:7D7F:97DC:404D:F1CE:FEB3:5B6F (talk) 04:44, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leeds vs Man U
Talk:Instrumentation (music)

message: Does anyone else think this section is quite sparse?  Or, should the main details be left to the orchestration section? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nathgregory (talk • contribs) 10:49, 20 November 2006‎
:I assume the section was "Instrumental properties", given that in October 2009 it was the only article body section besides the heading, but perhaps the comment above refers to the lead. Perhaps "orchestration section" refers to the Orchestration article. Regardless, the article has been fleshed out since then. Hyacinth (talk) 00:21, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Kepler (lunar crater)

message: Perhaps someone with better WP image skills than I have can provide an image of the moon with an inset box pointing to Kepler's location. The images in the moon crater articles are all from such a close-in perspective. Seems that readers would appreciate having a wider perspective. Bob Enyart, Denver KGOV radio host  (talk) 19:25, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Locate crater on full lunar nearside image
Talk:Autolycus (crater)

message: The section 'Satellite crater' and the accompanying illustration are confusing. The illustration's caption says that Autolycus is the feature marked F; OK, so what do 'A' and 'K' (in the column labelled 'Autolycus') mean in the accompanying table? (I'm guessing a little more text can clarify this - and a link to an article with more detail on this 'convention' would be great.) Twang (talk) 10:04, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing 

message: Before doing anything with the edit, I would ask: "Some of the ray material appears to overlay the flooded floor of Archimedes, and thus Autolycus is older than Archimedes." Older?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trigalaxy (talk • contribs) 08:41, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Older or younger?
Talk:Larry Stewart (philanthropist)

message: "Updated a link to say that it was dead." - Lucky Foot (talk) 20:47, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Courthouse Square Historic District

message: User:Station1, I reverted an edit of yours which, inexplicably as far as I can tell, deleted a number of entries.  It also lost the clear introduction that the list is ordered by state then city.  I was here looking for what turned out to be the Paris Courthouse Square Historic District, by the way, which i think is one that had been deleted, or at least I could find it among the Kentucky entries. --Doncram (talk,contribs) 05:52, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: That edit was 4 years ago! And hardly inexplicable with an edit summary "one bluelink per entry". Please see MOS:DAB. - Station1 (talk) 21:30, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  restored deleted items
Talk:Cultural history

message: If merged, the entry should remain titled "Cultural History".  This is a significant area of study, significant enough to have a page of its own. I am not familiar enough with archaeology to say if it should remain as its own page.  Nimby 17:58, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Old talk

message: I'm not sure why "RepublicanJacobite" can't grasp my point, but the assertion that cultural history is "(from the German term Kulturgeschichte)" is nonsense and should be deleted. 152.1.191.173 (talk) 18:05, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The deletion of material, with a very vague edit summary, is bad form.  That is why we have this talk page, so that discussion can occur and a decision can be reached.  Your approach, though, is not constructive. ---RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 18:09, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Seemed pretty constructive to me! 152.1.191.173 (talk) 18:19, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Kulturgeschichte

message: . 85.185.58.88 (talk) 18:25, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  How rock 'n roll started
Talk:Karl Nesselrode

message: Is there any relationship between Karl Nesselrode and Coupe Nesselrode?--81.62.39.227 (talk) 01:39, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You mean the dessert?  It was named in his honour, can't remember by which Paris or St. Petersburg chef....I was expecting to find an article on it, actually....Skookum1 (talk) 03:48, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coupe Nesselrode? 

message: "In deference to his mother's Protestantism he was baptized in the chapel of the British Embassy, thus becoming a member of the Church of England and not the Russian Orthodox Church." ——As a Baltic German he would not have been Russian Orthodox anyway, but some kind of Lutheran, or perhaps Reformed. He was probably christened in an Anglican venue because, at that time (1780), little distinction was made between Anglicanism and Lutheranism, as witness the scheme for alternating Anglican/Lutheran "bishops" in Jerusalem, a project that raised a furore among High Church Anglicans.
Nesselrode is buried in the Smolensky Lutheran Cemetery in Saint-Petersburg.
208.87.248.162 (talk) 15:44, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Religion

message: The Russian WP and various other sources have him born on 2 December (OS) = 13 December (NS).  Not 14 December.  I can't find any discussion of how this discrepancy arose, or any confirmation of which date is correct.  --  Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 23:08, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Portugal used the Gregorian calendar while Russia continued to use the Julian calendar up to 1918. Hence the famous October revolution of 1917 (which was actually a coup d'etat) took place on 7 November 1917 according to the Gregorian calendar. The 12 day difference relates to what calendar one is using. It is confusing, but the article should simply list the Julian and Gregorian dates, which is the norm in scholarship relating to Russia. --A.S. Brown (talk) 00:18, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Birth date discrepancy
Talk:Ehrlickiosis

message: This material should be moved to Ehrlichiosis  -(unsigned entry by Caroldermoid at 14:00, 20 November 2006)
:I tentatively agree.  However, the page you reference is primarily about the infection of animals, most specifically dogs.  This article is specific to the recent discovery of human infection.  If the articles are merged, human infection must have its own section.    
:Alternately, this page could be renamed to reflect the correct spelling and changed to Ehrlichiosis (human).  The other article could be changed to Ehrlichiosis (canine) or something similar.  Also, a disambiguation page could be setup and referenced by both articles.  This is somewhat similar to Parvovirus and Parvovirus B19 (although those virii are different species).  I think it may be worthwhile to keep these two articles separate if only due to the fact that the discovery of occurance in humans is relatively recent while animal infection is not (1935). Arx Fortis 03:35, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge - two versions of an article, one mis-spelt, should not be kept just because of animal / human differences. Most disorders should apply to the more important senario - us humans -  with animals being discussed separately as appropriate. We do not have Myocardial infarction (human) and Myocardial infarction (animal) (in part as humans are animals in that by and large disease processes are similar). So for this instance Merge, and as human relevance is the "new" and developing field then in intro explain establishd animal role vs developing role in humans, discuss mostly in animals and then a separate section for humans. David Ruben  Talk  03:49, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Adam Kowalczyk

message: I feel the current photo of Adam should be replaced. Here are some suggestions. They currently don't have the correct licensing tags on them but if you can let me know which ones you would like to add to the article I can organise to have them fixed.
* http://www.flickr.com/photos/pixelimagery/6004624197
* http://www.flickr.com/photos/pixelimagery/6004624233
* http://www.flickr.com/photos/pixelimagery/6004624271
* http://www.flickr.com/photos/pixelimagery/6004624327
* http://www.flickr.com/photos/pixelimagery/6004624387
61.68.253.62 (talk) 14:43, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: You can blame me for the photo, I had to crop it from the one used in the infobox on Live's page, couldn't find anything else! http://www.flickr.com/photos/pixelimagery/6004624271 would be great for the infobox and http://www.flickr.com/photos/pixelimagery/6004624387 would probably work in the article body. Thanks. Thegraciousfew (talk) 08:35, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Both images are now ready to be used. 61.69.141.192 (talk) 13:18, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Both uploaded and added to the article, thanks. Thegraciousfew (talk) 13:47, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  New photo of Adam
Talk:Nora, Italy

message: I'm not so sure about this page English quality.
:Seems fine, but I have proof-read and lightly edited several points. Fatcat2 (talk) 15:50, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The link to reference 8 does not work (I encountered 404).
:I'm looking for an alternative, nowhere yet have I found anything about Sardinia's Southern end sinking, though I do not dispute that this is probably happening. ATeacher (talk) 10:50, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lesson of Munich

message: This article adds nothing.  Marshall46 (talk) 19:38, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Appeasement]] 

message: While there are several parts of this that make a good case for how the Munich Agreement has been characterised by politicians and some sections of the media, there are many simplistic assumptions made in this article about the reasons for it. While they may be perfectly accurate in terms of a leader making a partisan speech for domestic political consumption, they are not necessarily facts by themselves and this needs to be made absolutely clear. Without that, the misuse and exploitation of the average voter’s lack of knowledge can’t be adequately highlighted. Flanker235 (talk) 06:08, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article needs a rewrite
Talk:Bloc Québécois Shadow Cabinet of the 39th Parliament of Canada

message: I started a new page on the Quebecer Bloc Shadow Cabinet of the 40th Parliament of Canada. Hopefully I could fix this page according to this.Xiaoshan Math (talk) 18:12, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  40th parliament 
Talk:Display list

message: Why is this article a stub? It's concise and covers the main points. If anyone thinks it's missing anything, please indicate and I'll see what I can do. Raichu2 05:33, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This page really kind of is a stub.  It covers the main points, but only vaguely and doesn't fully explain.  For example: OpenGL standard commands are in immediate mode, but it is also capable of "retained mode" operation.  Display lists are part of the OpenGL specification, as are things like shaders which do not quite use immediate mode. 68.199.6.138 (talk) 05:17, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  why is this article a stub? 

message: I think there is somehow something missing in the way Wikipedia treats the following three articles:  Display List, Immediate Mode, Retained Mode.  First of all, I think these terms may have different senses, depending on whether one is talking about hardware or software.  Also, Wikipedia shows Retained Mode as the opposite of Immediate Mode, but in my experience in hardware, Display List is the opposite of Immediate Mode.  Nowadays, I believe much graphics hardware contains elements of both.  It seems like there should be some way to clarify this.  For example, clearly delineate the software discussion from the hardware discussion in each article.  And also describe how graphics hardware has evolved over the past decades, and its relationship to these terms.  Finally, it seems like all three terms should be compared and contrasted in one article, perhaps the Scene Graph article.  --Westwind273 (talk) 22:17, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Immediate vs Display List vs Retained

message: One example provided for a Postscript printer states that a framebuffer to store an A4 sized image at 600 dpi requires "over a gigabyte". US Letter size (very similar to A4) is 8.5x11 inches. At 600 dpi, this would require 8.5*11*600*600 = 33660000 bytes (assuming an 8-bit grayscale image), or 32.1 MB. This is quite a bit lower than the estimated gigabyte the article states. Even considering a true-color image, this would still be only 96.3 MB.
Jimgeorge (talk) 05:10, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Example memory use for a Postscript printer
Talk:Fracture (geology)

message: such as bedding planes, joints, faults or stylolites
Bedding planes and stylolites are not fractures. Siim 18:12, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm, I've learned differently. Basically there are two mindsets — fluid flow vs structure. The fluid flow mindset will view any discontinuity as a fracture (which is also the definition of fracture), however, the structural geologist will view only stress-related fractures as the definition of fractures. Perhaps this should be re-included in that context. (I may get to this some day). +mwtoews 07:59, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Disputed

message: Is this a fracture or something else?
https://www.flickr.com/photos/stereotron/39470824331  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.56.104.182 (talk) 23:56, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Fracture or not
Talk:Thames Ditton railway station

message: I have removed this as I am not sure it be on here.  Doesn't strike me as encyclopedic - reads like a press release or a station poster. 
In the past few years, Vandalism, Graffiti and anti-social behaviour has increased. All Passengers are advised by South West Trains, the operators of the line, to report all criminal offences to their customer service centre, No matter how minor they are. 
The number to call is: 0845 6000 650, or Press the Help Point installed on the station on the Emergency Button and Customer Service/Security will be happy to assist you.
Also a reminder to vandals: CCTV is in 24 Hour operations. South West Trains can see what you are doing and use the Video as evidence in a court of law. The 6 Cameras on the station are sure to make a difference
Regan123 18:15, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Current Issues Related to Thames Ditton Station
Talk:DGK Skateboards

message: I'm uncertain as to how to show the importance of the article. In terms of notability, the company is advertised in skateboarding magazines, is associated with Reebok, a major (and notable) shoe manufacturer, and it is one of the skateboarding companies that will be advertised on Tony Hawk's Project 8 due to its connection with one of the featured skaters. If that is insufficient to establish notability than I have no objection to the article's deletion.Furby100 18:15, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importance
Talk:Tom Moreland Interchange

message: I saw the Reference tag and was able to come up with what looked like the source of the "Types of interchange" paragraph.  It looks like we may have some copyright issues here; the text in the referenced article almost looks copied word-for-word.  That, and the numbers may have changed (i.e., it wouldn't surprise me if Spaghetti Junction handles a lot more than 300k cars/day now). toll_booth 04:11, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: I made the following changes to the article:
# "Spaghetti Junction Atlanta" now redirects here.
# Cited a source for the opening paragraphs.
# Removed the Citation-Needed tag.
# Added detail to the five-level stack note but left a cautionary note that this may not be accurate, just in case.  The only reference I could find was wiki's Stack Interchange article, and the claim is not cited there. toll_booth 20:16, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem. =] toll_booth (talk) 17:17, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updated article
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Mr Stabby

message: |NO DELETE THIS A COOL — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.202.117.119 (talk • contribs) 10:17, November 20, 2006
I turned the deleted void that once held this page into a redirect to Joel Veitch, the original author. So yeah, hope no one minds. --Burstroc 20:54, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Ronnie Stephenson

message: I think his name is Ronnie Stephenson and NOT Ronnie Stevenson!
:True. The article text was right, the title wrong. The page has been moved to the correct title now. Fan-1967 18:24, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: However much we might appreciate the person/band etc. about whom we are writing, wikipedia is not a fan page and does not have opinions. I realise that there are a lot of articles out there which have obviously been written by someone's PR agent, but let's try to make them stand out for what they are - hype. Serious musicians deserve a higher standard. 83.180.128.128 22:45, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  toned down and tidied up! 

message: Have just deleted the following:
He had an amazing technical ability and an incredible sense of time. 
As the previous comment suggests, such language, though all-too-common in Wikipedia articles, is not suitable for an encyclopedia. Regards, --Technopat 23:19, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  deleted text 

message: Some of the too many paragraphs consist of one sentence only. BNutzer (talk) 22:22, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup
Talk:List of monastic houses in Ireland

message: I've been trying to fill in some of the open links on this page. So far, I've done Ross Errilly Friary and Clonard Abbey. Just began Claregalway Friary today. Dppowell 18:22, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Best of luck.  I have visited most of the sites over the past 7 years, but I have not yet embarked on such a mammoth task as writing about them.  --JohnArmagh 15:23, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Have to start somewhere, right?  :)  Dppowell 20:38, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: New pages for both. Claregalway was featured on Did You Know? last week, and I'll nominate Corcomroe shortly. Dppowell 19:11, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Claregalway Friary]] and [[Corcomroe Abbey]] 

message: Getting back on the stick... Dppowell 00:54, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stub up for [[Canon Island Abbey]] 

message: RIL Dppowell 00:53, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stub up for [[Multyfarnham Friary]] 

message: The whole of :Category:Monasteries in the Republic of Ireland has been assessed under Wikipedia:WikiProject_Ireland.  If you've filled in a red link on this list, please slap an assessment template on the new article's talk page.  Thanks! Dppowell 00:58, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Ireland|WikiProject]] assessments 

message: Someone has put my Tully Abbey (Co. Kildare) image into the section on Tullow Abbey, (Co. Carlow). PeterClarke 08:52, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tully Abbey pic 

message: Why does this article use Wikimapia as a source? It is a user-generated wiki and therefore surely fails WP:RS ? - Sitush (talk) 12:05, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikimapia 

message: I would like to propose a merge of this article with List of abbeys and priories in Northern Ireland. It makes more sense this has nothing to do with politics but the geographics, its simply a waste of dataspace having two seperate articles.
Please provide your answer along with an explanation. WinterIsComing (talk) 01:23, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: Changed listed founders from "Celtic monks" to "Gaelic monks". Because - unless there there Christians in pre-Christian times, and Antrim was originally in Gaul or Iberia - the term Celtic monks is an anachronism, and just plain wrong. Fergananim (talk) 16:03, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Antrim Monastery

message: Changing nomenclature as above in all counties (only down to County Cork so far), for above reasons. Fergananim (talk) 16:57, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Changing "Celtic monks" to "Gaelic monks"

message: It just needs a lot more photos - is anyone still updating this? Sarah777 (talk) 17:51, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: What a List!
Talk:Gul Panag

message: Happy 30th Birthday, Gul Panag. Le Anh-Huy 07:29, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Happy Birthday!

message: 120.59.14.248 (talk) 04:59, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: as you have not cited reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to any article. - Arjayay (talk) 07:40, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 31 March 2014