lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Knickerbocker glory

message: The Big Apple quotes a recipe for "The Knickerbocker" from The Dispenser's Formulary, or, Soda Water Guide (compiled by the editorial staff of The Soda Fountain; New York: D. O. Haynes 1915.) This seems to be very similar to the recipe that's currently widely used in the UK. Maybe the entry should say "before 1915" rather than 1930? Also this reference seems to solidly establish the KB as an American recipe that was adapted in the UK. 
The Old Foodie adds this...
"One of the many delightful theories is that the name comes from the colourful layers of the ice-cream and its embellishments (cream, custard, jelly, fruit …. ) in the requisite tall, tall glass, which resemble the stripes on knickerbockers (or the hose worn with them)...
It seems that perhaps the Knickerbocker Glory was a brief fashion in America, for there is a recipe for it in a Soda Fountain manual of 1915 ... By the 1930’s it had migrated to England ... where, in the absence of any competition, the briefly famous and quickly forgotten American Knickerbocker Glory, became a naturalised and enduring English Celebrity." RicardoJuanCarlos (talk) 20:37, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

message: The photo does not show a knickerbocher glory, but a trifle (sherry or not).
Regarding the recipe, the ones I've had in the past in London definitely had no jelly but fruit (fresh or tinned). And most important of all, they always had a large dollop of marshmallow sauce (strawberry too, but I don't remember any chocolate sauce).
Glaliot (talk) 17:07, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong image
Talk:Hemingby

message: Copyedited, and added historical text and inline cites for village, and for church and other listed buildings. De-overlinking common words, disambigging ‘Beck’, and added mileage conversion. Post town added to infobox.
Removed the Radio Lincs article that concerned a Wikipedia-non-notable resident, and said nothing of the village itself apart from private opinions, personal reflections and family background.
Parish Council web site External link is 404 dead. Removed Coach and Horses External link to pub-explorer.com, a site where publicans themselves add in their own promotional information which is taken on good faith by the site - see bottom of page here. Removed embedded link to Coach and Horses own promotional web site here. Wikipedia is not a trade directory. Removed embedded link to ‘pub’ – pic is already embedded in page. De-linked blue link to 'coach' which didn’t add anything that isn’t covered under the ‘coaching inn’ blue link.
Removed embedded link to parish church geograph.org – the same picture of the church is in the infobox.
Converted  BBC Radio Hemingby embedded link to an inline cite to new References section.
Citations are needed for unsupported claims if they are to remain – citations needed tags added.
This article is now more than a stub.
Added Find sources to talk to aid editor research. Acabashi (talk) 00:46, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: 14 October 2011 edit
Talk:Garcinia indica

message: I copied the taxobox from garcinia (the genus) and converted it to this article; however, the species may be indica and choisy may be a cultivar.  expert assistance appreciated.
see also Bhirand which seems to be on species: Garcinia indica. RJFJR 18:52, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

message: Should this page be merged with the page for Purple Mangosteen?? I think that it refers to the same fruit.Jimjamjak (talk) 10:44, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mangosteen? 

message: Can some experts put more light on the botanical aspects of the tree?
Leningrad (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 16:05, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the natural flowering period of the tree? 

message: The Tamil Name Kodukkapuli is the name of the fruit of the tree called as Pithecellobium_dulce.So I have removed the name and that name is not the name of this tree(Garcinia indica). Delince.samuel (talk) 13:29, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Change in the Tamil name

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.kokumbutter.net/kokum-butter-benefits/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Declangi (talk) 05:06, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Youth Hostels Association

message: The source page is almost wholly limited to a list of English and Welsh YHAs.  If the content of YHA is to be restricted to the YHA (England & Wales), as suggested in the Cleanup section, then there is no need for two aricles.--ARAJ 17:13, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree and would have suggested it myself it I had known how Davidahearn 17:46, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger from [[YHA England & Wales]] 

message: This article is now transcluded within YHA.
My intention is to create links to another article where the Youth Hostel is mentioned, as is the case with YHA Edale at the moment.  I do not intend to add references to Youth Hostels where no reference currently exists, but others may wish to do so.  
At this time, the view on Talk:YHA is that YHA should be the location of information about YHA England & Wales.  If this view is sustained, this article can be substituted at any time.  In the mean time, please do not add anything to this page except the names of current or former Youth Hostels in England or Wales.  Thank you.--ARAJ 16:42, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Talk:YHA England & Wales 

message: Having an article titled "YHA" means we should really cover the activities of these two rather large organisations. I would actually propose the article be transformed into a redirect to Hostelling International, with a new section being created on that article, but in the absence of such a move, this article should be made more inclusive. Orderinchaos 23:16, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  YHA Australia/NZ 

message: It srikes me that the YHA is represented less than other organisations of a similar size. I stumbled upon this article looking for historical information on a particular youth hostel. I feel it would be appropriate for some of the larger and historical Youth Hostels (eg Coalport, Ilam) to actually have their own pages. They are certainly as historically significant as some other manor houses etc that have their own pages. Coalport, for example, is the oldest remaining building from the Ironbridge china works. Fork me 11:15, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion, categories etc
Talk:The New York Trilogy

message: Why did s.o. deletet this: Blue print of relationships inside City of Glass
I think it links to a good summary.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 77.182.5.71 (talk • contribs).
:Apparently there is policy against linking to Flickr images in external links. However, since that image is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike, it can be uploaded to the Commons instead and then put directly in the article.–Unint 22:22, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course, even with that out of the way, it might still be inadmissible due to possibly being original research. –Unint 22:38, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

message: Here's a reference:
 
Walking Through Paul Auster’s "City of Glass": "Flânerie" in His Novel By Jeanette Gonsior, page 1, 2nd footnote.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.99.193.239 (talk) 15:31, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: "Very Soft Boiled"

message: I'm wondering whether we should delete the last segment of Metal Gear Solid 2. Whoever authored this section is right in that the game was inspired by The New York Trilogy, but he failed to not only cite his source, but further imposed his own opinionated analysis onto it. I'm not saying that we should dump this section altogether, just clean it up a little.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.127.100.182 (talk) 08:28, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Metal Gear Solid 2 

message: The second link in External Links  Paul Auster's "The New York Trilogy" as Postmodern Detective Fiction is broken and leads to a landing page with the following German text: "Bis vor kurzem hatten wir an dieser Stelle in Kooperation mit einem kommerziellen Anbieter dessen Katalog eingebunden und somit auch die Zusammenfassungen diverser Arbeiten. Nun aber verzichten wir auf die Einbindung eines (letztlich zwangsläufig eingeschränkten) Verzeichnisses, sondern verweisen auf diverse Anbieter – kommerzielle, aber vor allem auch solche, die sich Open Access verschrieben haben." Brief summary: There was a cooperation with a commercial entity, which was cancelled and the text is not accessible any longer. I tried to find the text online, but I only found links where to buy the book. In my opinion I would thus remove the link, as it's a link to a commercial site.
Wigginus (talk) 10:06, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken Link in External Links
Talk:SM-2

message: This article takes the point of view of an American reader:
The Standard Missile-2 (SM-2) is the Navy’s primary surface-to-air fleet defense weapon."
For example, I assume "Navy's" is supposed to refer to U.S. Navy.
:This 'article' is a verbatim copy-paste from the source 'cited', without any wikification at all. Joffeloff 15:49, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

message: As remarked by Joffeloff, this article is a verbatim copy from  and without layouting and wikifying in no shape for wikipedia anyway.
Because Standard missile covers both the SM-2 and the SM-3, I suggest to redir there and maybe add a reference to the above mentioned source to the article.
The doctor23 19:39, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio
Talk:Northern Ireland Assembly (1982)

message: I think it best to keep the assembly and the election separate. This page should be at Northern Ireland Assembly (1982) or something (maybe with James Prior's name in it since it often seems to be called "the Prior assembly") with the basic history and constitutional set-up, with the election page confined to the election details itself. Timrollpickering 12:49, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger
Talk:Geography of Iraq

message: I am not sure where the sentence, So-called "Marsh Arabs" have migrated through this region into modern-day Kuwait for centuries. belongs. Because of its temporal problems and lack of source, I have deleted it.  It certainly did not belong in the lead paragraph.  Maybe it could be documented and put in a proper place under settlement patterns. It was added at 00:55, 30 April 2006 by Fsotrain09. --Bejnar (talk) 00:10, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Migrations

message: There might be some contradictions on this page. 
00:11, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Please specify problems so that they can be specifically addressed. --Bejnar (talk) 18:54, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradictions? 

message: Because of the diverse climate in Iraq, it might be better to place climate under ecology and discuss the climate in each eco-zone separately.  What do you think? --Bejnar (talk) 18:54, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Climate
Talk:Dugald Baird

message: The title "Sir" has been removed from this article however it is used in a variety of sources eg Centenary tribute to father of maternity care - University of Aberdeen, Lords Hansard,  etc
Is there a definitive list? what evidence do I need to reintroduce this? — Rod talk 13:00, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Freddy Monnickendam

message: That he was an executive producer for some cartoon series is doubtless, but what about the other info? Did he create any comics? [Toonopedia doubts it.
Not only for Foofur though: all info on the Snorks (supposedly created in 1974 by Monnickendam) seems to me to come from one source and has been copied countless times. However, no 1974 comic has ever been shown (AFAIK), and all info I can find gives the origin of the Snorks as 1982, by Nic Broca (who would go on to make a few [[Spirou et Fantasio comics). See e.g. Bédétheque, a fairly trustworthy comics site. Why would an author make a comic for a series that is not his own, two years before it is turned into a cartoon, and eight years after it is supposedly created? 
Google can find only one page from Belgium that matches Monnickendam and Snorkels (the Dutch name for Snorks), the same page for Snorks Monnickendam, and none for Snorky Monnickendam (Snorky or Snorkies is the French name). 
What else is in this article: professional colleague of Peyo? If he hasn't created any comic (and I'm quite convinced that he hasn't), then he isn't a colleague. I have ,o idea how extensively he worked on the Smurfs, but Peyo did a bit more: he created them. The article as it stanbds gives the impression that their effort, their role, was comparable... 
If no one has good references to the contrary, I would change the article to just the first line:
Freddy Monnickendam was executive producer of The Smurfs (1981) and The Snorks (1984). He also was the writer of Foofur (1987). Fram 13:00, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Please only add this info or other info on Monnickendam again when you have verified it (and no, some website claiming that he created the Snorks in 1974 is not good enough: an editor, title, publication info, ... is needed). Fram 15:11, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Verification of info in article requested
Talk:Utsuri goshi

message: Please see my  discussion on my first technique page attempt,
Kata Guruma.
It's in techniques such as Utsuri Goshi where
tournament/competition videos are most helpfull,
in my opinion, for they demonstrate the true usefulness of a technique. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pereza (talk • contribs) 13:00, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Done. --Nightshadow28 14:51, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japanese script 

message: I'm removing the Image request template, because the article contains an image, although I personally suspect this image of copyvio, I cannot as yet prove it. Therefore it is a legitimate image until proven otherwise. — Jdcollins13 (talk) 16:16, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Image request
Talk:Aspis (Dungeons & Dragons)

message: Having recently started a List of Dungeons & Dragons monsters, I am trying to determine which monster articles should be redirected into the lists.  I believe this article may be a suitable candidate to be merged and redirected into List of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons 1st edition monsters, as that is when it first debuted in the Dungeons & Dragons game.  Please discuss reasons for or against such a merge.  If no discussion has taken place 5 days from now, I will redirect this article to that list; otherwise I will follow whatever discussion takes place here.  Thank you!  :) BOZ (talk) 03:28, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: As there were no responses, I redirected this article to the list page.  Since no response is also no consensus, any editor may restore this article at any time. However, rather than simply reverting, I urge you to use this space to develop some form of consensus regarding the article, lest another editor put this article up for deletion. BOZ (talk) 18:19, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirected
Talk:Same-sex marriage in the Republic of Ireland

message: Could (or should) the structure of this article be changed? I'll explain why I think it should but here's how I would have it looking:
1. Civil partnerships
1.1 Government legislation 2008–10
1.1.1 Recognition of foreign partnerships
1.2 Legal position before civil partnerships
1.2.1 Norris bill 2004
1.2.2 Labour Party bills 2006, 2007
2. History
2.1 Law Reform Commission (2000-06)
2.2 Constitutional review (2004-06)
2.3 Colley Report (2004-06)
2.4 Other statutory bodies and NGOs
3. Lawsuits
3.1 KAL Recognition case
4. Same-sex marriage
4.1 Government proposals 2011–present
4.2 Marriage referendum (new section detailing results of and arguments in the referendum)
4.3 Marriages (perhaps a section here detailing the first weddings to legally occur and when + future statistics - presuming of course, that the referendum actually succeeds)
5. Public debate
5.1 Public opinion
5.1.2 Polling
Why? Well I think the info under my history section is a bit cumbersome. Not a lot of what is discussed actually lead to any substantial policy outcome, and most of it is just somewhat relevant history of the debate in the mid 2000's about the nature of family in Irish family. I personally think they'd be better off in the one section. The other three seem to naturally fit together in a relatively chronological order. Maybe the history & civil partnerships section could be switched. 
Anyway, what do people think? Jono52795 (talk) 08:02, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem - the article flow seems to work well. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 10:37, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

text: This article was very much in need of a restructuring. This change is an improvement imho. Thanks. SPQRobin (talk) 15:22, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed article change realignment/suggestion 

message: Hi . I'm unclear why Irish translations of the names of articles legislation or phrases like 'civil partnerships' are being translated into Irish? WP:USEENGLISH and WP:IMOS would seem to apply, and there's no need to include Irish translations. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 21:48, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Irish language? 
Talk:The Early Singles (Pink Floyd album)

message: A proposal for changes to this article, has been made at Talk:Pink Floyd discography#Further review of box set standards.  The proposal for this particular article, is that it be merged into Shine On.  Please state if you're for or against, over there.  Thanks! --A Knight Who Says Ni (talk) 15:03, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal
Talk:Noel (given name)

message: I don't see the point of this entry.  It's not a disambiguation page and it doesn't even point to famous people/characters with the name.
On the other hand, if there isn't a "personal names" portal, maybe there should be.  It's a popular subject, certainly. Tweeq 13:11, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:George Montagu, 1st Earl of Halifax

message: This article has been Wikified but needs to be expanded greatly.
--Auxfusion 13:11, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It would be good if someone who knows their Burke's could sort out the story with this:
:"...Only a few weeks after succeeding, he was created Viscount Sunbury and Earl of Halifax, revivals of the titles also held by his uncle..."
and on the uncle's page
:"...the viscountcy and earldom became extinct on his death as he had no sons while he was succeeded in the barony according to the special remainder by his nephew George Montagu..." 
Snori (talk) 02:55, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, just found the article Earl of Halifax, which makes it as clear as it can be made...Snori (talk) 02:58, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Two 1st Earls?
Talk:Mount Townsend (Snowy Mountains)

message: Huh?  Tradition to carry a rock from the bottom to the top?  I XC ski in Kosciuszko NP, I am a member of a few bushwalking clubs... and never have i heard of this tradition.
Here come those precious 4 tildes that signify me! - Huh?   124.184.91.117 (talk) 01:49, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Rail transport by country

message: This "list" of "Rail transport in ...." is notable in that most of the listed articles do not exist. Unless it is being used as a guide for the active writing of the missing articles, is there much point in having it?--SilasW (talk) 13:16, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That is part of this page's purpose. The pertinent guideline mentions "In general, red links should not be removed if they link to something that could plausibly sustain an article."  In this case, the red links are articles that should be but haven't yet been written.  We have more editors interested in rail transport in the countries with blue links than with red links, but that doesn't mean they should be delinked or removed from the list. Slambo (Speak) 13:34, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  A not very helpful article (? as yet?) 

message: A discussion has been started at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Countries/Lists of countries which could affect the inclusion criteria and title of this and other lists of countries.  Editors are invited to participate. Pfainuk talk 13:42, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: New Discussion
Talk:Metrovalencia

message: What line did the accident occur on? --M1ss1ontomars2k4 (T | C | @) 04:08, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Line 1, look at this , first paragraph. Bye! --Emijrp 08:02, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Line? 

message: Does it use a third rail or an overhead wire? Which current system is used?
overhead wire
--81.202.158.49 07:32, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current system? 

message: Why is there no line 2?? Georgia guy 00:04, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  The branch line from Ademuz to Betera was originally line 2. It was later merged with Line 1 when they extended the services from there to Villanueva de Castellon. Valenciano 17:49, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The line 2 was the branch from Empalme to Lliria (his colour was the green) but about ten years ago FGV decided to explote it as a line-1 branch and it hadn't any relationship with the services to Villanueva de Castellón (the first train arrived to Villanueva de Castellon in 1917). New line 2 its been building from Orriols in the north to Nazaret in southeast as a tramway —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.203.153.148 (talk) 17:32, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

text:  UrbanRail.net doesn't say anything about those lines not being a metro line in fact quite the opposite as on this page it distinguishes between metro lines and light rail/suburban raillines. [] and you could say the same about many other suburban metro lines in Europe - the met line in London is mainly suburban and runs on lines previously used by commuter trains. As lines like line 1 run metro trains they're considered a metro. I don't understand the rest of your points and - no offence - you should get a better english translator as they don't make sense in English. Valenciano 17:49, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Line 2 

message: Should this be done? -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 23:59, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to metrovalencia 