lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Povl Riis

message: User:Pigsonthewing, please stop inserting the Wikidata-based source just to make a point. Your version has worse formatting of the authors, lacks the volume, doesn't link directly to the source itself, has the wrong name for the publisher (according to the website you link to), and adds an unnnecessary Wikidata link. Please indicate how your repeated reverts are an improvement for readers or editors? Fram (talk) 10:48, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Fram, the POINT violation is all yours. You're being deliberately disruptive, because you have a clearly expressed antipathy to anything coming from Wikidata. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:59, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm being "disruptive" by replacing a worse citation (yours) with a better one (mine)? We'll continue this at WP:ANI then, as you don't address the actual reasons why your version is worse than my "crud". Fram (talk) 11:13, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:POINT]] violation
Talk:Sweyn the Crusader

message: Was he legitimate or illegitimate? Some say he is the son of Sweyn II and Gunnhildr Sveinsdóttir while other says he is one of Sweyn II's illegitimate sons.--Queen Elizabeth II's Little Spy (talk) 13:11, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legitimacy 

message: Someone should translate this source under Sven, dansk prins and add it to the article.--The Emperor's New Spy (talk) 22:41, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: More.--The Emperor's New Spy (talk) 21:02, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation
Talk:Jeszenszky

message: I have removed an unsourced statement recently. The ethnicity of the first known ancestor is simply not known. However the surname "Temerdek" means "numerous" or "a lot of" in Hungarian therefore Slavic origin looks a bit dubious in my opinion. Fakirbakir (talk) 20:12, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It could be of Jasz origin.--Kun Kipcsak (talk) 07:13, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slav origin? 

message: I did not find these names in the footnoted sources. I leave it to a chance that I have poor vision, therefore please five me an exact quotation, so that I can verify the claim. - Altenmann >t 17:55, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I hope you are joking. The modern Hungarian name of the Slovak Turčianske Jaseno is Turocjeszen (check the Hungarian wiki page). The sources say the name of the family comes from the medieval Jeszen village, Turoc county. The first known ancestor, Andras Temerdek, received territories from the king around Jeszen village in Turoc county. The Hungarian wiki page even emphasizes the former parts of Turčianske Jaseno (Kisjeszen "Minor Jeszen", Nagyjeszen "Major Jeszen"). Fakirbakir (talk) 21:16, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: So, as requested, what is the verifiable source (not a link to Hungarian wiki) for the allegation? FactStraight (talk) 21:49, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: What? "Allegation? Learn some Hungarian settlement history. Turčianske Jaseno consists of two former settlements. These settlements united in 1971. When these two villages belonged to Kingdom of Hungary they were called "Kisjeszen" (Small Jeszen---"Horné Jaseno" in Slovak) and "Nagyjeszen" (Large Jeszen----"Dolné Jaseno" or "Malé Jaseno" in Slovak). Would you like some proper translation? It is getting ridiculous.Fakirbakir (talk) 22:05, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Please avoid insults. I requested to provide references, according to wikipedia rules. which call the settlement Jezsent, as was claimed in the article. As I see, now the claim is removed. - Altenmann >t 04:12, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jeszent / Jaseno 
Talk:Georg Nikolaus von Nissen

message: Halliwell's opinion is utterly irrelevant and since she relies exclusively on the weak secondary literature, her book has no scholarly value as a source on Nissen's life whatsoever. And Solomon's musings on Constanze have proved to be flawed. More important is Brauneis's article on Nissen, but would have to be willing to look a little beyond the limits of one's backyard.--62.47.135.1 (talk) 19:43, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Halliwell
Talk:SourceForge

message: SourceForge's logo has apparently changed. The logo here is outdated. TheDaJakesterTalk 20:34, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo 

message: This article is a disaster. There's even an entire section of, from what I can see, specialist technobabble seemingly irrelevant to the rest of the article.  What is this, why is it included, and what does it mean?
: Simplifying a little, the SPF record for a domain is intended to identify those public IP addresses which are permitted to send mail for a domain.
: As at August 2018 the SPF DNS TXT record for 'sourceforge.net' redirects to that for '_spf.sourceforge.net' which is
: "v=spf1 ip4:172.16.0.0/12 ip4:216.105.38.0/26 -all"
: The CIDR block 172.16.0.0/12 is reserved by IANA in RFC1918 for local private use, and thus has no place in any SPF record.
Oecology (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 09:20, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Irrelevant jargon 
Talk:Large deviations theory

message: This article is basically a reproduction of the information in the extreme value theory article, although this article does mention some connections with physics that are new to the EVT article. So, I propose that we merge this article with that one.
Paresnah 20:25, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal: merge with Extreme Value Theory 

message: Extreme Value Theory studies the distribution of the single largest (or smallest) value encountered in a series of trials, while Large Deviations
Theory essentially studies the asymptotics of the tail distribution of the *average*
of such trials. These are not the same subject.  The theorems are different, textbooks on either do not discuss the other, etc.
63.3.2.1 (talk) 23:58, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Response: the two topics are different 

message: This bound is rather sharp, in the  sense  that  I(x)  cannot be replaced with a larger number which would yield a strict inequality for all positive  N . 
This statement is not precise. It is a function, not a number, and it makes a big different because you can always sneak in a slightly  "larger" function. Well, nearly always, so you have to say what you mean by "larger": for example, say "grows faster" which would be defined to mean that the new function J(x) is related to the old by J(x)/I(x) goes to infinity as x goes to infinity. This is false though. If one merely wants to add a small number to I(x), say so, but this is rather trivial and not really worth stating. 178.38.151.183 (talk) 16:29, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I think, it is about the number  I(x) , not about the function  I  (that is,  x \mapsto I(x) ). "not really worth stating"? Maybe; I do not know. Boris Tsirelson (talk) 17:13, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sharp? 

message: The phrase "Moreover, by the central limit theorem, we know that MN is approximately normally distributed for large N" is correct, and does not mean that this distribution converges to N(0,1); see for instance Normal distribution#Central limit theorem: "the sum of many random variables will have an approximately normal distribution"; also, "the binomial distribution is approximately normal"; etc. User:Jmbarrios understands correctly what happens, but rejects the convenient and widely used terminology. Boris Tsirelson (talk) 17:45, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Approximately normally distributed
Talk:Lint (software)

message: lint is a Unix command, it should be lowercase, should it? If not, revert that edit. - PGSONIC 14:02, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Lowercase

message: Would a link to JSLint.com be more appropriate here or in its own article? --Jesdisciple (talk) 13:47, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This is an article on the C program verifier "lint" and a link here would not be appropriate.  Other language verifiers (like jslint.com) go in List of tools for static code analysis, I think. -- George Gesslein II (talk) 16:46, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  JSLint 

message: This article does a good job explaining that it is a static code analyzer. If fails to mention whether it is still in use anywhere, and if not, what it was been replaced with. I started using C on Windows in the early 90's and have not ever used lint. I also suspect that when people speak of using lint, they are really talking about lints replacements in a generic sense.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.73.93.176 (talk) 15:48, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The "vendor Unix" platforms all have lint, though it may be provided solely as part of a licensed development suite.  Tedickey (talk) 20:49, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where is lint now?
Talk:Lomé Convention

message: This article is not original writing. In fact http://en.academic.ru/dic.nsf/enwiki/522686, and http://www.absoluteastronomy.com/topics/Lom%C3%A9_Convention, and http://en.academic.ru/dic.nsf/enwiki/522686 all say the exact same thing. I am a bit troubled by this, as it means that it is quite likely no one is actually reading what these things say, and assumptions are made as to the truth of these articles. Please be more proactive in making sure all that is written is in fact true, and that plagarism is not cool. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Orelfligelman (talk • contribs) 00:30, 10 December 2009
:All three of those articles are mirrors of this article.  They copied and correctly attributed the text back to eikipedia, there is no problem with this.  ~~ GB fan ~~ talk 00:36, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion by [[User:Orelfligelman|Orelfligelman]] moved from the article 

message: Dear editors,
I changed ECU to EAU in this edit. Could you kindly review if this is correct?
Xinbenlv (talk) 21:59, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for Review
Talk:Cotonou Agreement

message: If anyone is watching this page to work on it, is there any way that the signatories could be incorporated into the article?  It seems like perfectly encyclopedic information, and I'm curious for the impact of the agreement on EU football. matt91486 (talk) 21:25, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Henley-in-Arden

message: This article reads like it's been cut straight from the Henley-in-Arden tourist website! Maybe it has been...but whatever, the tone of the article is completely inappropriate for Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not an advertising space, it is an encyclopaedia, providing balanced and impartial facts about subject matter. This article ain't it. Murderouspigeon 20:31, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've re-written the article from scratch, I hope It's an improvement. G-Man * 22:27, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: User:G-Man's work was a great improvement. However, after the problems with continual reversions into a non-encyclopedic entry and back, the new material added is interesting, but much more attention needs again to be given to making the article's structure conform more to the guidelines of Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements.  DDStretch  (talk) 09:21, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Structure of the article

message: I've moved the section called, at the moment "Lunatic Asylums" into the "History" section as a sub-section. That way, the article becomes more compliant with the guidelines Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements. Additionally, I think calling the sub-section by an archaic colloquialism is not good practice, as it would be misunderstood by people.  DDStretch  (talk) 10:19, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Asylums 
Talk:Salomėja Nėris

message: The article contains English titles and later full bibliography is included in Lithuanian. Xx236 (talk) 10:46, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Titles of books 
Talk:Oscar Milosz

message: For the second time probably.Xx236 (talk) 06:03, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  In 1931 he became a French citizen 

message: Was he also an alchemist?
~~Wialliams~~ 2607:FEA8:4A2:4100:7456:8AC0:769F:982 (talk) 07:48, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alchemist?
Talk:The Cove Palisades State Park

message: This first-cut article turned out longer than I intended.  I still think it could use more info, and it's not referenced the way I'd like.  But as a Wiki-newbie, I'm not sure if it still meets the definition of a stub.  Opinions? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ipoellet (talk • contribs) 20:36, March 13, 2007
:Hi, be sure to sign your posts with 4 tildes (~~~~). I think it's longer than a stub but you could add this  template to it instead. Happy editing. Katr67 20:57, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops.  I knew the 4 tildes rule, but I'm still working on making it a habit. Werewombat 21:27, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, and thanks for the stub/expand opinion.  I think I'll do that. Werewombat 21:29, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stub? 
Talk:Notre Dame Junior Senior High School (Utica, New York)

message: OK, I'll go first.  Seems to me I never see or hear much from alumni on the "official" ND web pages.  I graduated from ND High School in 1961, having spent the three prior years at UCA in downtown Utica.  That means the first time I saw the Burrstone Rd. school building was the day before graduation.  While we rehearsed for the following day,  electricians were draping wires around us and installing lights in the auditorium.  The brothers always played things close.  I have a photo of myself and my girlfriend standing outside of the main building on graduation day...myself in a blue choir robe, her in a Jackie-style outfit...among the small hills of dirt and rock that formed the landscape-to-be.
Yes, we actually spent our first year at Notre Dame holed up in the former New Hartford Country Day School, next to Utica Mutual Insurance Company's home office.  Home to 10 bazillion dead flies, we students had only to spend our days there.  The poor brothers lived there and had to remain all night.  
I hope things improved after 1961.  N2chi 20:34, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ducati 996

message: "A new airbox and a distinctive underseat exhaust system were also built into the new design."
Correction - the 996 had the same exhaust system under the seat as the 916. Phreakster 1998 20:36, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  March 2007 

message: This article expresses opinion and uses slang language such as "hot commodity". This needs to be fixed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 32.97.110.58 (talk) 13:43, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hot commodity 

message: I actually like the image :File:StevenMettet.jpg (not a helpful file name though) ; it's a good composition and I think the use of the frame with the tarmac, grass and sky is interesting and the motion draws in your eye. The problem is that it's a terrible illustration of the Ducati 996. The picture is more an illustration of what it's like at the track. It might possibly -- with a little context -- be a decent illustration on pages like Motorcycling, Track day or Sport bike.
As far as five spoke wheels and so on: So what? It's a picuture of a wheel with five spokes. It isn't as if the average reader is utterly unable to imagine what a five spoke wheel looks like after having looked at a three spoke wheel.  If Ducati 996 were several times larger and had more wide-ranging coverage that included verifiable information about Ducati 996s at the track, then such an illustration might work. If you wanted to go that route, I would first cite high quality, verifiable sources who state that the 996, specifically, is in fact one of the most popular track bikes. Without proof, I'd guess you could say that at least 100 other bikes are at least as popular at the track. --Dbratland (talk) 18:04, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  File:StevenMettet.jpg
Talk:Operation: Rebirth

message: Good start.  When I get the chance I'll make some tweaks here and there, but overall a nice one to begin with.  Dac 20:40, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Good start
Talk:Halobacteriaceae

message: This article is of very low quality and feels like it was taken from a teenagers book report. Can we please have a microbiologist rework it.
Wright
Wright apparently doesn't know what he's talking about by calling them photoautotrophs.  I wasn't able to check Bergey's, but the other source he uses for this statement has nothing of the sort in the text.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.102.74.70 (talk) 21:02, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hi everyone,
I plan to modify the introduction since I saw that it contained a lot of plagiarism from the cited articles. I also added a bit more general information about Halobacteriaceae morphology and ecology in my edit. I'm still a just a student and new to editing  Wikipedia so feel free to give any feedback or correct any errors.
LevanaYang (talk) 05:09, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modified the Introduction
Talk:Italian Romanians

message: I never heard of Italians of Romania except in relation to 12th C outposts of Genoese and/ or Venetians. If we are talking about "Italians" that have been in Romania for 8 or 9 centuries, can they still be termed "Italian"? I am sure they are fully assimilated and ethnically mixed. Other than the odd contemporary businessperson, adventurer, wanderer or tourist, does the term actually apply? If not, this article should be omitted so as to not offend the hundreds (possibly thousands) of Americans in Romania, Swedes in Romania and Mexicans in Romania (among many others). 66.183.217.31 20:45, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, Italians are an officially-recognised minority in Romania, a status which is accorded generally only to historical minorities, not recent immigrants. As an officially-recognised minority, Italians have one guaranteed seat in parliament, as well as a range of other rights as per the minority rights law. At least from this legal standpoint, their situation is thus different from Americans, Swedes, Mexicans, Chinese, etc.  Ronline ✉ 02:42, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Dear Ronline: It is absolutely amazing that 3,300 people in a country of about 22 million, that have lived there for hundreds of years and are "fairly dispersed throughout the country", have not assimilated (in spite of the fact the language is similar and they have been there for centuries) and, as an officially recognized minority, are given one seat in parliament! You must expand on this!! 66.183.217.31 17:15, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: To be honest, I don't exactly know why the Italians are an officially-recognised minority in Romania or what the criteria for gaining this status is. It is important to note, however, that there are officially-recognised minorities which are smaller than the Italians. The Albanians of Romania, for example, number just 500 people, and are also entitled to one seat in parliament, etc. Additionally, there are 17 officially-recognised minorities, including Czechs, Greeks and Poles, so the Italians are just one of many such ethnic groups. It is probable that there are more Romanians of Italian ancestry than just 3,300, with this figure including only those that have not assimilated. Those which have assimilated, and no longer speak Italian, are more likely to declare themselves as "Romanian" on the census, particularly since the question asks about ethnicity rather than ancestry. I suppose many of the 3,300 Italians recorded in the census are actually recent arrivals, born in Italy and in Romania for business purposes, etc. This is likely considering the significant business and trade exchanges between Romania and Italy, the fact that Italy is Romania's largest trading partner, etc. Ronline ✉ 05:57, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Paltan

message: This is a very important part of Dhaka, as soon as I've any information I'll add to it and if anyone does have any information then please add.
-Miltonzs 20:46, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important part of Dhaka 

message: We are on the verge of an edit war over the title of this page, so it is time to stop and discuss naming conventions. See . Note that at , there is no specific guidance for Bangladesh.
Page move history:
*14:35, 30 November 2014 Wikinga.int moved page Paltan, Dhaka to Paltan, Dhaka, Bangladesh over redirect (Paltan is a most busy city in the Dhaka Division of Bangladesh)
*14:15, 30 November 2014 Aftab1995 moved page Paltan, Dhaka, Bangladesh to Paltan, Dhaka over redirect (see Wikipedia:Article titles)
*06:40, 29 November 2014 Wikinga.int moved page Paltan, Dhaka to Paltan, Dhaka, Bangladesh over redirect (Paltan is a most busy city in the Dhaka Division of Bangladesh)
*17:15, 26 November 2014 Aftab1995 moved page Paltan, Dhaka, Bangladesh to Paltan, Dhaka
*10:55, 10 November 2014 Armaanaziz moved page Paltan to Paltan, Dhaka, Bangladesh (Paltan is a most busy city in the Dhaka Division of Bangladesh)
I see that the WP:primary topic for Dhaka is the capital city of Bangladesh, and not Dhaka District or Dhaka Division. So,  implies that Paltan is part of the capital city of Bangladesh itself. I'm wondering, if  is unnecessary disambiguation (that currently redirects to Dhaka), isn't  also unnecessary disambiguation? Wbm1058 (talk) 16:23, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Let us halt the dispute for a while and set up a naming convention for Bangladesh there. – nafSadh did say 00:27, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: A convention for naming geographic locations in Bangladesh is proposed. – nafSadh did say 01:28, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming conventions for Bangladesh?