lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Derek Hough

message: The Performance history section seems to be getting long. I would like to suggest a separate article to be created about that specific section. TeamGale 01:09, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Performance history 

message: I removed the maintenance tag in the theater section after adding reliable sources regarding Hough's theater performances to the table. Sunline09 (talk) 17:10, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation Tag Theater section
Talk:Catherine Bell (actress)

message: Acted in A Summer To Remember  (2018 Film) 41.13.20.21 (talk) 05:12, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Catherine Bell 

message: Acted in A Summer To Remember  (2018 Film) 41.13.20.21 (talk) 05:15, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Acting 

message: Acted in A Summer To Remember  (2018 Film) 41.13.20.21 (talk) 05:18, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Acting 

message: Her grandparents were Muslim, but Catherine was also exposed to Catholicism and attended a Baptist summer camp, then Bell was raised Roman Catholic beneath. She is supposedly bisexual, but in spite of that she managed to remain a Scientologist. 89.64.81.72 (talk) 05:12, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: What doesn’t make sense? All of those things can be true at the same time. Rcarter555 (talk) 06:09, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: No. Either you're only exposed to something as a child, or you're actually brought up in it. Scientology doesn't allow people to be in non-heterosexual relationships, she would get kicked for that, so the "bisexual" part is probably OR, inferred from the "divorced from a man, shares house with a woman" part. 195.187.108.130 (talk) 14:55, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Lots of people do things that are technically against their religion. Her bi-sexuality is well documented, as is her Scientology beliefs. Rcarter555 (talk) 15:48, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not about doing any old things against one's religion, it's about doing the kind of things that get you officially, ballistically kicked out. That's why it was so surprising. 89.64.70.34 (talk) 00:53, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Surprising or out, it’s true. Rcarter555 (talk) 07:21, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Makes no sense 

message: See above 172.58.101.92 (talk) 18:57, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  In her early career wasn’t Cathryn Bell in some soft porn movies ?
Talk:United National Front (Afghanistan)

message: Inline links suck when they go 404.  When a reference goes 404, but whoever used it included the 
title, publication, author, date of publication, it remains a valid link.  A reader can use that info to look for mirrors, or go to the Library to look up the paper copy.  
Please don't use unadorned inline links.  Geo Swan (talk) 20:56, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  inline links suck when they go 404 -- see talk
Talk:Blake Island

message: would be relevant to know why it was named "blake"! also some statistics and top-level detail of the trails, campsites, and moorage available. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.235.6.150 (talk) 23:38, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The link titled, "Blake Island Visitor Information" is no longer available. Perhaps it's been shut down; I can't find any reference to it anywhere. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.54.180.40 (talk) 02:15, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Obsolete External Link
Talk:Lewis Wesley Cutrer

message: The article gives the dates of his term as 1957-63, but the infobox has 1958-64. To make it worse, the List of Houston Mayors has 1958-63. Which is it? I'm inclined to believe the List of HM, because the previous & subsequent mayors have to fit in. CFLeon (talk) 21:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Dates Confusion
Talk:Haroon (singer)

message: This article is way to biased. I'm not saying I like Haroon or anything, but this was obviously written by a fan of his. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Iman S1995 (talk • contribs) 19:40, July 12, 2007
:Yes, it was copied off his own website.  I've rewritten it, but it still needs independent sources.  Can't even verify the BBC award - it's not mentioned at coverage of the event e.g.  or . - Fayenatic (talk) 14:26, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bias
Talk:New York Public Interest Research Group

message: This article does not source any thing. and is very POV.  All information is uncited.
Although parts were POV, it was previously pretty inaccurate. Not sure where you can source things like "has two main offices"?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.131.145.225 (talk) 00:17, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This entire page did not ettempt to cite one single thing. IF somebody can bring it back, with reliable resources that would be great. As it stood, it was just free advertising for the group. (Very POV, written by PR staff no doubt).  I WELCOME YOUR COMMENTS! ````Jimmihoffa  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimmihoffa (talk • contribs) 02:11, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WHY I removed all unsourcesd uncited material from this article 

message: Here is what was taken out of the article (again):
"NYPIRG is New York's largest consumer protection and good government organization.
Mission statement:"NYPIRG is a nonprofit, nonpartisan research and advocacy organization established, directed and supported by New York State college and university students. NYPIRG’s staff of lawyers, researchers and organizers works with students and other citizens, developing citizenship skills and shaping public policy. Environmental preservation, consumer protection, higher education, government accountability and social justice are NYPIRG’s principal areas of concern."
Membership acquired through the door is most effective to show politicians that they have been informed about an issue."
These statements are very POV and not cited.  A Mission statement is not appropriate for an encyclopedia article, and therefore should not be included.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Richprentice (talk • contribs) 00:58, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why I made changes 

message: Name dropping Obama does nothing to tell us about the organization. He did not found or lead the organization so his involvement would be more appropriate in the Barack Obama ecyclopedia entry. Whatsmore, the reference is only an old blog that can't be found online- thus it is unverifiable.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonnyhottrod (talk • contribs) 23:55, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It is referenced by amNY which is a free daily newspaper circulated in New York City by Newsday.  The article is definitely weak but all you are doing is taking referenced material off the table rather than adding anything of value to the article. Americasroof (talk) 00:48, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Barack Obama
Talk:Graciela Daniele

message: WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 23:45, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Mark Messier Leadership Award

message: Has this award been cancelled by the NHL? There's been no monthly winners this season. Anybody got citations explaining this? GoodDay (talk) 17:47, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Article needs a re-write now that they changed the format. --Krm500 (talk) 23:38, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-08? 

message: Due to a change in the featured topic criteria, the National Hockey League awards featured topic has 3 months to satisfy criterion 3.c. by getting peer reviews done for the 3 audited articles in the topic: Mark Messier Leadership Award, Roger Crozier Saving Grace Award, and NHL Foundation Player Award. Rreagan007 (talk) 04:15, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: National Hockey League awards featured topic

message: In the first year it was a monthly/annual award, and last year just annual.  Perhaps it might alleviate some confusion to just chart the annual winners, and mention the five monthly winners from the first year in prose? Resolute 23:35, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Monthly winners
Talk:Ann Crumb

message: WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive
Barely a Start class.
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 23:49, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: On the contrary, I think that this is quite enough as it is for a person of this apparent notability. You seem to be working on an assumption that everyone should have a very long article, but most subjects only merit a short article. That's the way that Britannica works, and it should be the way that we work too. Alex Middleton 22:33, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Alfred Chester

message: Wrote a bunch of bio stuff.  Could use a list-format bibliography with ISBN numbers... --Larrybob 23:53, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Template talk:Legendsofhockey

message: I notice that this template will not work with Hall of Famers on the legendsofhockey.net website, due to the different URL syntax. For example http://www.legendsofhockey.net:8080/LegendsOfHockey/jsp/LegendsMember.jsp?mem=P197802#photo will lead to Jacques Plante, which is a much different format than http://www.legendsofhockey.net:8080/LegendsOfHockey/jsp/SearchPlayer.jsp?player=11269 which leads to Scott Pearson. Should we create a separate template for Hall of Famers, or amend this one? Flibirigit (talk) 01:27, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I would use a seperate template, however I am not sure it would be possible to alter this one. But I don't know how to code these things very well, it might be possible to put in a switch that says to use the other url type if they are a hall of famer. -Djsasso (talk) 17:29, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've looked at the code, it would just be way too complicated to work both URL variants into one template. I'm suggesting  be created instead. Flibirigit (talk) 18:37, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: A separate template makes sense, I agree. And it should be relatively straight-forward to copy from one to the other? Alaney2k (talk) 19:37, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Broken link to Hall of Famers

message: I would also like to add a "See also" to this template, similary to :
 ==See also==
  for NHL players inducted into the Hockey Hall of Fame
Thanks. Flibirigit (talk) 18:15, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I should haven't mentioned that the "See also" needs to go inside the noinclude tags, or else it shows up on players pages. That needs fixed. Flibirigit (talk) 21:39, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've moved the usage notes to Template:Legendsofhockey/doc using the usual documentation system, so you can add whatever notes you want yourself. Happy‑melon 22:06, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. I wasn't aware that was possible. I don't think anymore changes need to be made though. Flibirigit (talk) 22:14, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit request to protected template
Talk:Wolfmother's 2008 Album

message: I've commented on the Talk page for the actual Wolfmother article about this before and i think this article should be deleted unless any sources for this information can actually be found. The album title hasn't been given at any point anywhere, the current songlist is just any song that Wolfmother has played and wasnt on the album (making the album a sequel AND putting a zeppelin cover on it? i thought they were trying to downplay similarities) and im not positive but i think someone made this article in response to me asking for a source for the album name in the original article. Wikipedia isnt a source for a Wikipedia article. .. in the amount of time i was writing this comment somebody atleast changed the article title, so thank you for that. EDIT: I switched some stuff around, added an unverified information header and original research one. Apparently this article is causing a lot of buzz on the internet which is unfortunate that people arent checking the sources of the article to see that this is actually fan fiction and not the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth lawlz Donnelly Rules 23:57, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I will tend to this article next time I get. I'll clean it up, because there is a reference. Please just give me at least 24 hours, and it will be fixed. I have to run for now though. -- Reaper  X 23:55, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, I've removed alot of the original research, and added in the reference. I will expand later. -- Reaper  X 19:10, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm re-directing this page to Wolfmother.  There is next to no information about the album and hasn't been for the last few months since it was created.  At the moment there's 1 quote, and 1 possible track, and no other info.  Sorry if I'm treading on anyone's toes but this isn't worthy of a Wikipedia article, but I'm re-directing instead of going through AfD since it'll probably need to be recreated eventually. The KZA 15:01, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delete This Page?
Talk:Christine Andreas

message: WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 23:58, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:M90 (camouflage)

message: Half of the article is about the m90 camouflage and half is about the m90 uniform, maybe the article should be split into two articles? If not, I think that the title of the article, m90(camouflage), should be edited to m90 or something similar. 83.183.13.254 00:08, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  split the article? 

message: The colours of the M90 camouflage is dark green, medium green, black and grey. The only uniforms sporting navy blue are those that have been washed with bleach. /Esquilo (talk) 14:05, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  True colours 
Talk:The Duke (1998 film)

message: I went ahead and rewrote the page, recounting the film from memory rather than resorting to any variety of plagiarism.
Not sure whether I should include the producer/director/cast data. The latter I am attempting to acquire along with a copy of the film.
Thesaur 00:14, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:DailyTech

message: It seems dailytech is dead, it hasn't been updated in almost half a year...   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.126.206.226 (talk) 05:04, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Darwinism, Design and Public Education

message: I'm moving this from a commented-out part of the article to here on the talkpage, where it may prove useful. HrafnTalkStalk 12:05, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Laundry list 
Talk:West Rock Ridge State Park

message: I was at the sports zone on S Bradley road today, and I assume the hill behind the building is part of WRRP
I would say the article should mention that the hill has several radio type towers, and that the cliffs are quite large an ddangerous.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.67.134.245 (talk) 23:05, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: radio towers and cliffs

message: The tunnel through West Rock is the only highway tunnel in the state of Connecticut. Currently, “West Rock Tunnel” just serves as a redirect to this article; however, I think that this tunnel is certainly notable enough to have an article in its own right. (See article on Pennsylvania’s Allegheny Mountain Tunnel for a decent example of how a tunnel article should be done.) I may soon have to just make an executive decision and begin work on the West Rock Tunnel myself, as I think such an article is probably long overdue. --Sgt. R.K. Blue (talk) 05:54, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I decided to take my own initiative and draft an article (albeit a stub) for this tunnel, which can be found at "Heroes Tunnel," the tunnel's current name. I have also modified the redirect page "West Rock Tunnel" to instead redirect to the Heroes Tunnel page instead of this article. --09:12, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tunnel 
Talk:Paul Metcalf

message: non-referenced US writer biography; questionable notoriety
</blockquote>
Is this a joke?  
800 Pokemon articles and nothing for one of the country's great experimental writers!  I take some responsibility for letting this article languish as a stub once created.  I will do Mr. Metcalf justice in due course.  What is needed now to keep the deletionist at bay?  Proof of the subject's "notoriety"?  Compromising pictures of him with schoolboys?  
Or did the deletionist mean notability? 
Metcalf had a full-page obit in the New York Times on January 31, 1999.  "Like a medieval chronicler with the eye of a poet and the heart of a taleteller, he fits together radiant fragments into a wholly new kind of construct," said Guy Davenport.  
His book Genoa was reviewed by William Gass for the  New York Times in 1965.  ("Parallel Patterns," by W.H. Gass, June 19, 1966).
Metcalf was one of the great compilers of other men's voices.  The legacy of his great-grandfather weighed upon him in this regard.  Pound was also an inspiration.  He would have loved Wikipedia: a palimpsest of voices.  --G-Dett 00:39, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe you could be the one to add some sources to the article, then?  Incidentally, "listen you heathens" is a personal attack, and not at all the way Wikipedians talk to one another.  Not everyone has heard of everyone; that's why we have the requirement that all articles include references. -FisherQueen (Talk) 11:43, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I was kidding, sorry.  I know Metcalf is borderline obscure.  I'll add two or three sources by the end of the day.  I've been meaning to expand it for some time now.  All best,--G-Dett 14:33, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Jan Kazimierz Sapieha

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: procedural close of this discussion, as it has been merged into  to avoid a split discussion.  Primefac (talk) 19:25, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Jan Kazimierz Sapieha the Elder →  – By analogy to move request on Kazimierz Jan Sapieha, he wasn't "the Elder" but actually Younger than his uncle. Marcelus (talk) 07:46, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 4 August 2022 
Category talk:Intelligent design controversies

message: Having this category is too fine a split? -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 00:10, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Does seem redundant redundant. ArtifexMayhem (talk) 01:16, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 03:36, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Isn't ALL intelligent design controversial?
Talk:Parliamentary representation from Bedfordshire

message: I'm not sure how to report an error.
The page as it stands shows the abolition of South Bedfordshire in 1983, and the number of constituencies reducing by 1 from 5 to 4 - this is incorrect.  Bedfordshire retained 5 constituencies throughout the period 1983-1997.  The missing constituency is the South Beds or South-West Beds seat - whichever it was named at that time.  Otherwise the page is good.
I was born in Bedford and was invited to seek the Labour Nomination in South Beds in the mid 1970s...
Thanks.
Rob (aka Robcollis)
* Thanks for the input. I see that the Bedfordshire constituencies from 1983 are Mid, North and South West, with the two Luton seats - North Luton and Luton South. I see I got it right in the detailed table, but missed one of the seats in the graph and summary tables. I therefore agree there were 5 Bedfordshire seats and I am grateful for the correction. --Gary J 12:53, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Template talk:WikiProject Creationism

message: As this template design currently exists, including this template on article talk pages automatically puts those talk pages in :Category:Arthropods articles with comments. This does not seem appropriate to me, for example, with the Talk:Bill O'Reilly (commentator) page. Should the offending line be removed from the template or is a different course of action more appropriate? Ben Hocking (talk|contribs) 14:24, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops... I borrowed some code from the wikiproject arthropods banner. Good catch, I've fixed it now, article with comments are listed here now.  –  ornis⚙ 15:13, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

text: Argh... dammit! I misnamed the cat... fixing...  –  ornis⚙ 15:15, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

text: Lordy, lordy, lordy. Alright... fixed, it'll take a little for the articles to appear in the proper cat though.  –  ornis⚙ 15:29, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! Ben Hocking (talk|contribs) 15:43, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arthropods articles with comments 

message: This template seems to be generating some sort of Javascript error - see, for example, Talk:Intelligent design, which (in IE7) gives me a stadard JS error box:
:Line: 303
:Char: 5
:Error: Invalid argument
:Code: 0
The error disappears when this template is remmed out, or when an invalid class name is used (for example, the page works if the template is set to class=X rather than class=FA).  The problem is obviously associated with the "-Class" template selection code, but I'm afraid that my expertise doesn't extend to fixing it. Tevildo (talk) 12:36, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Another (potentially-related) point - if you click on the "show" link next to "The following comments were left by the quality and importance raters", although the resulting text is wider than the screen, the horizontal scroll bar on the main browser window isn't displayed, making it rather tricky to click on "hide". Tevildo (talk) 12:46, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Javascript problem 

message: This template might lead to a template loop. See e.g. Talk:Darwin's Black Box and press "Show". Debresser (talk) 20:35, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  template loop 

message: I see that a new member of this Wikiproject has unilaterally added scripting for his own, apparently unsanctioned, YEC Wikiproject to this template. May I suggest (i) that this would require a consensus of members of this project & (ii) if YEC were rolled in, it would probably make more sense to rename this Wikiproject to 'Creationism'. HrafnTalkStalk(P) 14:39, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  YEC