lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ivo of Chartres

message: "It was also during his time in office that he wrote the bulk of his works, which he later became most noted for and as such, awarded him a place among the top fifty greatest thinkers of the medieval era (as detailed in John Scottus Eriugena's book, "Great Medieval Thinkers")."
How could that be true? Eriugena lived a couple of hundred years earlier and obviously would not have written a book with that title. Adam Bishop (talk) 06:35, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't read the article when I "wikified" it after recent expansion, but a reference like that does not inspire confidence that the editor has a good understanding of the sources. But I just removed the reference to Eriugena and Great Medieval Thinkers, since it cannot be true. Has Eriugena's work been published as part of a series called "Great Medieval Thinkers"? That would explain the confusion: many editors are not careful to cite editors for editorial comments and instead cite the primary authors, sometimes leading to ridiculous statements like the one here. Srnec (talk) 02:22, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Aha, that's exactly right. It's a series from Oxford University Press. The Eriugena volume was edited by Deirdre Carabine. I never thought of that. Adam Bishop (talk) 06:16, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Eriugena?

message: In the information box on the upper right-hand side it states that Ivo is venerated in the Eastern Orthodox Church. But as a rule of thumb people who died after the Great Schism (1054) are not included even in newer Orthodox lists of saints that include western saints. I will remove the reference for now, but if anyone has evidence that I am wrong, feel free to re-add it. Horatio325 (talk) 09:20, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Veneration
Talk:Arbuckle Mountains

message: Major lack of information here. This is extensively studied. C'mon geology people.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.153.24.194 (talk) 09:19, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs more info

message: I am doing a project for school and need more information about the region. What is the population? What is the main source of income? What are some of the agricultural businesses and products here? Can someone please help me find answers?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:304:6EAA:9669:2C8B:2978:38F3:F623 (talk) 01:40, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help! 

message: Cement is not a naturally occurring mineral. Cement is manufactured. Say limestone instead/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:8C4:0:AE00:79BC:8BE4:5E4B:D3EA (talk) 04:40, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cement? Come on folks 

message: Are their Hotels near here?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:300:4500:98F0:38A9:A340:C02D:40A9 (talk) 14:48, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  hotels 

message: The first part of the History section claims "The Arbuckle Mountains are the oldest known formations in the United States between the Appalachian and Rocky Mountains. They contain a core of granite and gneiss that date back at least 1.4 billion years." I wasn't able to find the source for this from the National Park Service to verify the claim, but I'm pretty certain it's not entirely accurate. Older formations exist at least around the Northern Highland and North Shore regions around Lake Superior that are older than 1.4 billion years, if not elsewhere in the country as well. Krotius (talk) 01:44, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Oldest known formations"
Talk:List of King George V Playing Fields in Cornwall

message: Can anyone provide more accurate map references for the fields? King George's Field
:have a look at http://www.magic.gov.uk/website/magic/viewer.htm?startTopic=magadminareas&latlongref=50.625462,-4.725493  Fiddle Faddle 16:54, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Proverbs 31

message: Just for the record, many Christians do not look at this to say that God thinks women should work in the home. On the contrary the woman is discribed as working hard and selling goods at the marketplace, etc. Although there is nothing wrong with women choosing not to work outside of the home, I think Proverbs 31 praises this woman for utilizing her God-given talents (whatever they may be), being a productive member of society, being a good wife & mother, and having good business sense.
Why is this page categorized under 'Jewish liturgy'? Certainly, Proverbs is a Tanakhic text, but what is the specific use of Proverbs 31 in Jewish liturgical practice? Thanks. 89.100.160.110 23:37, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:
Talk:Beaver River (Oklahoma)

message: So we could place in the lead something explaining that the use of "Beaver River" would be considered as "beginning at the confluence of Corrumpa Creek and Seneca Creek, and ending where it joins Wolf Creek". I am looking for something to give a defining difference between the use of the two names justifying separate articles.
:Feel free to edit! Personally I think identifying one as a tributary of the other sufficiently distinguishes them as distinct entities. Or the "Course" section could simply be moved to the lead. I don't think it's necessary to repeat the same information in two brief and adjacent sections. Thanks--TimK MSI (talk) 12:49, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I think with TimK's edits it is fine, just call it a tributary and leave the detailed explanation to the Course section.  I don't think you need to spell out why it's a separate article now that they aren't overlapping, the name definition now has sources describing it as a separate river which should be good enough. But if you want to expand on it I'm not going to argue.  Kmusser (talk) 12:53, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I will look at it when I get a chance. But first---- thanks for the improvements. This is a reason why I prefer attempts at discussions sometimes over some bold move like going straight to a merge discussion or AFD. Straight interchangeability of names indicates a merge should be considered but with the federal designation and article improvements it now seems clear there is justification. As for the lead and redundancy, I don't feel summarizing for clarity is duplicity. Many people may only read the lead. The name "North Canadian River" has sometimes been applied to the Beaver River" and a two sentence lead section means expansion won't do any harm. Google map only shows the one river anyway, so this becomes more important in curbing confusion.  Otr500 (talk) 16:51, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Lead
Talk:Eamonn Andrews

message: 'He is perhaps best known as the presenter of the UK's version of This Is Your Life, between its inception in 1955 and his death in 1987...' 
But then: 'Eamonn became the very first This Is Your Life subject on British television when he was surprised by the show’s creator, Ralph Edwards.'
If he was the original presenter, I don't see how he could also have also been the original subject. Valetude (talk) 15:03, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the Wikipedia article on This Is Your Life, Ralph Edwards, who invented the US version in 1948, presented the first British show, with Andrews as his victim, but thereafter Andrews was the presenter. NRPanikker (talk) 20:02, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarify, please 

message: I was just watching an episode of What's My Line on which Mr. Andrews was a challenger, and he put an accent mark on the first letter of his name when he signed in (see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FCDlLUfh1YU beginning at about 3:52). Should that be included on his name here? I don't know enough about the conventions of the Irish language (or about Mr. Andrews, for that matter) to be confident in adding it myself, but I'm hoping someone else will. Thanks! -- edi(talk) 13:56, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accent mark
Talk:Bob Francis (radio presenter)

message: Better? --Bottom Feeler 23:03, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  '''Image''' 

message: I have made the callsign consistent throughout the article and created Internal Links to the callsign. Kathleen.wright5  11:24, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Callsign consistent throughout article and created Internal Links. 

message: I have added Internal Links to this article and deleted multiple instances of FIVEaa. Kathleen.wright5 17:24, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added Internal Links 

message: There is an RfC on the question of using "Religion: None" vs. "Religion: None (atheist)" in the infobox on this and other similar pages. 
The RfC is at Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion. 
Please help us determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 22:57, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion|Request for Comments]] 
Talk:Confrérie des Chevaliers du Tastevin

message: The French wikipedia article has a different motto (devise): Jamais en vain, toujours en vin.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:2000:14C6:C089:F96D:D90F:F575:DC78 (talk) 20:00, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Motto
File talk:Paganreconstruction (2).gif

message: I have just uploaded :Image:Paganreconstruction (2).gif. This was created by Gary Malkin who I have contacted & he has given his permission for the image to be used on Pagans Hill Roman Temple I tried to tag this appropriately but it automatically added a speedy deletion message. What tag should I use? - question also asked on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions in an attempt to prevent speedy deletion.— Rod talk 23:03, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Bachkovo Monastery

message: Please mention that two great bulgarian churchleaders, Stefan and Cyril, are buried in the church of Bachkovo.
Those men were involved in the saving of bulgarian jews during WW II and are alone already worth a pilgrimage.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.60.171.102 (talk) 10:49, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Gerhard Roßbach

message: A 12,000 mile march seems very excessive.  Probably unheard of.  Probably not true.   From where to where?  How long did it take?  Maybe it was 120 miles or something more like that.  Moreover, the supposed march is not even mentioned in the main article :Freikorps in the Baltic   Hmains (talk) 22:57, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  doubtful fact 
Talk:Battle of Beaune-la-Rolande

message: A question both in general and specific: Is it deemed worthy of inclusion that a notable person was killed in a particular battle? I'm not thinking of the case when e.g. high-ranking commanders are killed (which is obviously relevant), but people notable for something different?
In this battle, for instance, the painter Frédéric Bazille fell. What is the policy for including this information or otherwise?
Thanks!
OMHalck 23:27, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable people killed in action 

message: Commander of the X. Korps was Voigts-Rhetz, not Friedrich Franz. The reinforcement was not under the command of von Alvensleben, it was against his order. The Order to Wolf Louis Anton Ferdinand von Stülpnagel was to hold position some miles behind, if the X. Korps was forced back. Stülpnagel acted arbitrarily when he moved forward. --Batke (talk) 18:59, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: German Commander
Talk:Australian Marine Mammal Research Centre

message: From WP:ORG "Organizations are usually notable if the scope of activities are national or international in scale and information can be verified by a third party source."
DGG 23:19, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Kykkos Monastery

message: The History section is copied verbatim from , which is a violation of copyright and therefore needs rewriting. I will eventually do it, but it will be a while before I have the time so if anyone feels able to sort it out, please do so. Faerie Queene (talk) 00:58, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The History Section 
Talk:Pingo

message: The two external links (diagram of open and closed system pingo) lead to pages, that don't exist any more. 217.7.204.75 (talk) 14:55, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: External Links

message: Why are coordinates provided at the top right as if this were a specific location? If nobody objects, I'll remove them. Kansan (talk) 19:35, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinates 

message: apparently also means a ceylonese traditional carrying stick... eg. search for 'pingo carrier'. prat (talk) 21:32, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: If it's notable enough to have its own article, then create that and add a hat note. If it's not notable enough then it shouldn't be mentioned in this article either. Mikenorton (talk) 22:13, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  another meaning 

message: Twice in the text, both times in the caption of a photograph, a drained lake is described as being able to be outlined. What exactly is this supposed to mean? None of three dictionary definitions of outline seem to be relevant. Is this some type of geological jargon? Rwflammang (talk) 20:45, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that "The formerly drained lake can be outlined." should read "The outline of the previously drained lake can be seen." Ping  to see if that is what they meant. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 09:50, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outlined
Talk:Michael Salinger

message: h i lexi
Why would this page get tagged for notability when other similar pages (with less info) such as taylor mali's do not? 
Also, there are several performance poetry pages that link to this. It may be a small audience that is interested in the genre comparitively speaking, but I believe there is an interest.
68.253.20.91 14:41, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Nullarbor (demoparty)

message: This article is quite valid in the eyes of some editors and does not need deleting on the grounds that the deletion was promoted - however there are  issues raised in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nullarbor (demo party) which need to be addressed - please make comment there if you support retention of this article  SatuSuro 01:08, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have reverted you. If you don't think the page should be deleted, say so on the AfD page. (Note, by the way, that I have voted the page be kept, so this is not part of a deletionist conspiracy). Hesperian 10:57, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: RE concentrating energies - there are in the realms of wikipedia a whole range of editors who 'gate keep' the encyclopedia from some of the most amazing vandalism and rubbish you could imagine - that comment does not pay respect to the fact that when this article when if first appeared (not  in a sandbox but incrementally improved by a new user with no edit history) it appeared quite like the material that gets trashed daily by the gate keepers.  It has only reached the current state because of a few editors and admins deciding to not support the initial justifiably deletionist move.  Be grateful that some actually read 'around' the issue to find that some 'keep' support might be worth considering, otherwise it would have been gone ages ago :)  SatuSuro 11:20, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion
Talk:Forest Reserve Act of 1891

message: Is there a source for Roosevelt passing this law? Roosevelt was elected in 1900, so it can't be during his presidency. --shadytrees (talk) 23:13, 22 April 2007‎ (UTC)
:The law was passed in 1891 which Roosevelt used to reserve timberlands, the law was 'on the books' when he took office. Marcia Wright (talk) 01:26, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Roosevelt?

message: I propose to merge Forest Reserve Act of 1891 into General Revision Act. I believe these are the exact same laws, both passed in 1891 and being found at 26 Stat. 1095-1103. While the Forest Reserve Act article lists the Statutes-at-Large, and the General Revision Act does not, I found the same reference for the Forest Reserve Act used for the General Revision Act in Gary D. Libecap, Bureaucratic Issues and Environmental Concerns: A Review of the History of Federal Land Ownership and Management, 15 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 467 (1992). It has been difficult to find a source that lists both these names at once, but every discussion I can find on either law points to the exact same statute. It appears that "Forest Reserve Act of 1891" is usually used on topics related more to § 24 of the original statute, while General Revision Act refers to the broader law.
However, I have neither the time nor energy to manage this merger. But it seemed my duty to point out this discovery. At least if the articles are not merged, the difference needs to be made much clearer. Even the General Revision Act mentions many of the same consequences of the law (e.g. Presidential forestry reservations) as the Forest Reserve Act of 1891, so their subject matters are not so easily independent for two articles. Zkidwiki (talk) 04:32, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: , Thanks, I have merged the content of the articles. The content was suprisingly different enough there wasn't much explicit duplication, but it's clearly the same topic Reywas92Talk 15:16, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Hagop Kazazian Pasha

message: I have removed the following sentence: 
Due to the state-sponsored destruction of the Armenian community in the Turkish state which commenced in 1894-95 and reached its apex in 1915, the remnants of Kazazian's extended family were scattered penniless to the far ends of the earth.
Hagop Kazazian lived alone with his elderly mother and had no wife or children. He lived between 1833-1891. I can find no facts supporting the sentence above. Please note that this is not a dispute about the events of 1915, just a dispute as to whether or not Kazazian's family was affected in 1915. --Free smyrnan 13:07, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good article, and I wouldn't worry about this exclusion.  If there is a specific account of what happened to his family after he died, it would be worth discussing whether it should be included, but it is of questionable importance since it is not him and it is post-mordem...  --RaffiKojian 02:50, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: True, it is a good article. Good job smyrnan! It is nice to see articles like this from time to time :) Baristarim 03:00, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! --Free smyrnan 06:05, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of uncited sentence

message: I am asking for citation that Agop Paşa was Catholic. I have not seen any references that make this claim, especially the book by Çarkçıyan, Yervant Gomidas would be relevant, as the author is a Catholic priest and mentions it particularly if someone was Catholic. Also, in the biography provided by Çarkçıyan, it is mentioned that the order given by the Pope was delivered through the Patriarch Azaryan to Agop Paşa. So, if there are references that state Agop Paşa is Catholic, please provide them. --Free smyrnan 05:35, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Armenian Catholic? 

message: This article belongs in Biography, not Military history. I have changed the project templates. PKKloeppel (talk) 14:52, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Project change
Talk:This Is Serious Mum (album)

message: This is TISM's first public release. I have a rare copy of the cover and pictures of the tapes and the track listing. I have external links for verification which I will be adding shortly.
Very important to the discography of TISM.
:Do not remove Afd templates.--Jersey Devil 21:46, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The best way to ensure the article is kept would be to provide verifiable independent sources of information about the demo tape - some possible examples might be a published book about the band, or reliable press articles. Have a read of WP:VERIFY and WP:RS. Regards, CiaranG 08:26, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Talk:Morris Knolls High School

message: We need a picture of Knolls here. S h a r k f a c e 2 1 7  23:49, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: 2 pictures are now on the page. --Michael Greiner 19:22, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks a ton, Mike. Beat me to it. --SharkfaceT/C 03:15, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Only one was mine. --Michael Greiner 14:32, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks anyway. --SharkfaceT/C 20:41, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pics needed 
Talk:2007 reasons of the Supreme Court of Canada

message: There are two problems with this article.
# Despite its title, it provides no information about the reasons given by the Supreme Court for its decisions in 2007. Instead, it's a roster of who delivered each reason, joined in it, delivered a concurrence, issued a dissent, etc.
# The table, being color-coded only, fails accessibility guidelines.
Largoplazo (talk) 01:07, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problems with this article
Talk:HU-210

message: The article says "Per a 2005 article in the Journal Of Clinical Investigation, HU-210 actually stimulates cell growth in the brain's hippocampus region, an opposite effect of drugs like alcohol, nicotine, heroin, and cocaine." A web search shows that many popular science outlets seem to suggest that this result implies that cannabis has the same effect. Does anyone know if such a study has been done with cannabis, and if so, what the results were? Cannabis has been around for much longer and it seems like we should already know if it had the effect described, namely stimulating growth of brain cells. A5 13:07, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brain cell growth 

message: The old CAS no was the right one for HU-210, the new one is for HU-211. I changed the article a little bit as it mixed both HU-210 and HU-211. The INN of HU-211 is Dexanabinol and HU-210 is just HU-210.
-- Panoramix303 (talk) 00:34, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: CAS and other stuff

message: The sentence about toxicity was removed  because it is purely speculative. The references are in a proper format now.
-- Panoramix303 (talk) 15:06, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Some more updates

message: I'd like to point that the last paragraph is taken almost word for word from the march 2009 DEA microgram bulletin. wouldn't that be considered as a copyright infringement?
http://www.usdoj.gov/dea/programs/forensicsci/microgram/mg0309/mg0309.html
198.103.172.9 (talk) 21:09, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: last paragraph copyrighted?
Talk:Bentiromide

message: This ma be the way chem articles are started---suggest listing at Chem Wikiproject. DGG 00:06, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: List at Chemistry WP
Talk:Erin Gruwell

message: in the articles references section, pretty sure someone just mucked with it  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.71.60.101 (talk) 02:13, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  ...good good? 
Talk:Valerian Trifa

message: The article describes him as a ″fascist″, but the evidence in the article points to him being a former fascist: no evidence is presented that he continued to hold his earlier views, and he even seems to distance himself from them.  What is Wikipedia policy on this?  I’d have thought that either  appropriate supporting evidence should be added, or the description should be changed.TheTruth-2009 (talk) 08:44, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fascist or former fascist?