lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Xia (philosophy)

message: This article gives a nice summary, but requires more detail. 24630 00:42, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

message: I added a merge tag to this page some months back. If no one objects, I intend to follow through with this. However, since a large portion of the page is uncited or unnecessary commentary, little of it can be used in the youxia page. Despite this, I will post the bits I don't use on the talk page in the hopes that future editors will be able to provide sources for the material. --Ghostexorcist (talk) 12:56, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Last chance for objections. --Ghostexorcist (talk) 08:04, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: I have reverted the redirection to Youxia because the latter and Xia are not interchangeable terms. This redirection may cause confusion, as some pages link Xia as a similar class in Chinese history as knight was in Europe. This may lead some people to think that all Chinese knights were knight-errants. I have also added some links that I found that supply a source for most, if not all the text.
:I fail to see how they are not interchangeable terms. Both describe a martial-oriented person who uses their skills to uphold justice. Much of the information in both articles is almost exactly the same. However, the major difference is that Youxia has verifiable sources. The two websites that you cited are unreliable. The first one does not cite any sources of it's own and so its content is unverifiable. The second is a wiki mirror of an older version of this page. In essence, it is like listing another wikipedia page as a source, which is a common mistake made by new users. I still intend on contacting an admin in the future, but I hope we can work this out in the meantime. I'll give you time to try to find better sources and to add more material to the page that differentiates it from Youxia. But if you are just reverting for reverting sake with no intentions of expanding the article, then one-on-one discussion is useless. I'm erasing the sources now and adding a citation tag at the top of the article. --Ghostexorcist (talk) 21:56, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Its been almost a week now and you have not made any changes (verifiable sources, new material, etc.) to the page. I'll give you a few more days before I contact an admin. --Ghostexorcist (talk) 02:21, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed it back, once more. If you are to redirect it to youxia at least make a section refering to xia specificaly, as to clear out that not all Chinese knights were knight-errants.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.200.222.22 (talk) 06:14, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revertion of redirection to Youxia
Talk:We've Come for You All

message: Not sure which version has "We're a Happy Family" on it as a hidden track. On my version (U.S.), the only thing resembling a "hidden track" is W.C.F.Y.A. which is 7:17. The first part goes until 4:09 and then at 6:11 something comes in that sounds like a rattle and someone muttering incoherently in the background. FiggazWithAttitude (talk) 17:38, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hidden Tracks?
Talk:Mo' Money, Mo' 40z

message: I dont know if it fits here or not, but since Mo Money, Mo 40z isn't in any stores, the only place to get the album is through Tony Lovato's mother, often called "Mestmom" on the mestcrapp YahoO!Group.  The closest link I can find, is the old google cached page, http://72.14.207.104/search?q=cache:F4UGK2RubgsJ:mestcrapp.com/mmm40z.htm+%22mo+money%22+site:mestcrapp.com&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=2&lr=lang_en
Ok, I did some more searching, at it's actually posted on there message board now.  http://www.mestcrapp.com/msgboard/kb.php?mode=article&k=2  there's also some misc. information on that page, that may fit this article.  --adamh 16:26, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:David Smith (public servant)

message: What exactly he accuse Whitlam of misleading the Australian public about?
I saw his ACA interview, and all that came across was that he didn't like Whitlam, and did like Kerr. Ambi 05:55, 9 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text:  Is this the case even where someone is a citizen of both countries? It seems similar to the case of Lord Conrad Black, where there were problems caused by the fact that he was also a Canadian citizen. Apparently the Australian government didn't try to stop Robert May from taking up a peerage.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.49.167.131 (talk) 10:22, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: With the expected redirect on Australian_head_of_state_dispute I have asked for more latitude could be allowed in this article: David Smith (public servant), summarise his arguments that the GG is Head of State. This will make sure no valid information would be lost. This was agreed by Qexigator (talk) 12:29, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Head of State arguments 

message: The article does not establish what Smith's working relationship with Bill Hayden was like.
I think this working relationship is somewhat significant since Smith read the proclamation of the Whitlam dismissal and Hayden was Treasurer in that government.
The Whitlam Government's dismissal arise from the blocking of Supply in the Senate and Supply was certainly under the purview of then Treasurer Hayden. 49.3.72.79 (talk) 14:03, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  His working relationship with Bill Hayden
Talk:Kreis Jarotschin

message: Looks like there was a map intended but all that appears is "(map)" ;Bear 06:00, 2004 Nov 9 (UTC)
:Yes, I got ahead of myself, pasting templates. See Kreis Kolmar for example. Bwood 05:30, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: All Kreise articles have now been updated, including maps. Bwood 14:34, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Paterson Inlet

message: Why the redirect? Is there another Paterson Inlet? Grutness 06:00, 9 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved over redirect to Paterson Inlet. – Liveste (talk • edits) 21:30, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect?

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. Seems to be the common name. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 19:29, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Paterson Inlet / Whaka a Te Wera →  – Per WP:COMMONNAME and WP:CONCISE. The current dual name sees minimal use in reliable and independent sources, with no news sources and only 21 scholarly sources mentioning both names, and even less using a dual name. In comparison, 72 news sources and 657 scholarly sources use the proposed title. BilledMammal (talk) 08:15, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 24 June 2022
Talk:Three Cheers For Sweet Revenge

message: I removed the overview section as the concept is just a POV and Gerard Way has stated half the album isn't directly related to the concept anyway. This was included in the article but the quote and overview were contradicting each other and one had to go.
:I readded it. I will be looking at sources and editing the section.  Orfen User Talk</small> | Contribs 18:51, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the song by song analysis, and I believe that until an appropriate song by song analysis can be found that it should not be readded. It would be helpful if anyone could possibly try and find interviews about the album and the band talking about the concept itself. However, I don't feel the whole Overview section should've been removed. Some of it can be sourced and if a reliable source can be found then I'd say add the information in the appropriate section.  Orfen User Talk</small> | Contribs 19:33, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  overview 

message: I'm no expert, but whilst looking at orphan articles, I found this: All I Want Is You Revenge.
Is this a mistake? If so, can anyone help out correcting it?
Speechy 23:25, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Similar page
Talk:The Future Sound of London

message: {{Substituted comment|length=906|lastedit=20080804221940|comment=Start class=
There's enough information for me to know who and what the band is, but the article is short and has no real depth.  It lacks citations for any of the material. It doesn't have  or any images.  The purpose and intent of the Aliases section is lacking—there should be some sort of explanation there, rather than just a bare list.  But ... it's a start! :)  Xtifr tälk 20:00, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment

message: According to , Peter Hammill is/was recently working on a project with The Amorphous Androgynous. Should that be mentioned here? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:01, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peter Hammill
Talk:Abolition of the han system

message: Hi. I just read this pair of sentences:
*In August 1871, Okubo, assisted by Saigo Takamori, Kido Takayoshi, Iwakura Totomi and Yamagata Aritomo forced through an Imperial Edict which reorganized the 261 surviving ex-feudal domains into three urban prefectures (fu) and 302 prefectures (ken). The number was then reduced through consolidation the following year to three urban prefectures and 72 prefectures, and to the present three urban prefectures and 47 prefectures by 1888.
And I was wondering if there are references that contain a list of all of those prefectures that occur during that time, starting in the following format:
*a.) three urban prefectures (fu) and 302 rural prefectures (ken) as of August 1871
*b.) three urban prefectures (fu) and 72 rural prefectures (ken) as of the following year (through consolidation)
*c.) three urban prefectures (fu) and 47 rural prefectures (ken)
Each one of them must be grouped by splits and mergers within those periods. Let me know if possible. jlog3000 (talk) 18:01, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Right here.  -Amake (talk) 10:10, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need a full list of all prefectures since the Meiji Era began.... 

message: Consolidation contains this body of text:
"Although the former daimyo had become government employees, they still retained a measure of military and fiscal independence, and enjoyed the customary veneration of their former subjects. This was considered an increasing threat to central authority by Ōkubo Toshimichi and other members of the new Meiji oligarchy, especially with the large number of ex-samurai revolts occurring around the country."
As the samurai rebellion do not begin to occur until 1874 and later, and this article covers a period of time encompassing 1868-1871, this is a large inconsistency.  How can ex-samurai revolts that have not occurred for 3 or more years yet influence what happens in 1871?  That would truly be a miracle of time and space.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.8.132.118 (talk) 21:27, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anachronism in Consolidation.
Talk:The Firstborn Is Dead

message: song title is "Train Long-Suffering" not "Train-Long Suffering". only a mistake on my german album, 12" vinyl (mute int 146.816, Stumm 21, marketed by Intercord Ton GmbH, Licensee), or what's right ? 89.182.131.120 (talk) 14:21, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Song "Train-Long Suffering" or "Train Long-Suffering"
Talk:Nikon FM

message: I don't understand -- how is this a "system", and why does this camera merit its own article? The camera seems to me a good example of a member of the Nikon F system. I recommend a single (and eventually longish) article about the Nikon F system, including all Nikon's F-mount cameras (including those branded Nikon, Nikkormat/Nikomat and Nikkorex, and whether for film or CCD) and the lenses for them. Hoary 08:13, 9 Nov 2004 (UTC)

message: * Anonymous.  “Nikon F3: Successor to Nikon F2 and F” pp 80-86.  Modern Photography’s Photo Buying Guide '85.  reprint from Modern Photography, June 1980.
* Anonymous. Nikon SLRs (FA, FE2, FG, FM2, F3HP) advertisement. “Some of the world’s greatest photographic achievements haven’t been photographs.” pp 56-57. Modern Photography, Volume 47, Number 12; December 1983. [The exact term used by Nikon Inc. (USA) in this advertisement to describe the level of the FA, FE2 and FM2 is "serious amateur."]
* Anonymous.  Nikon USA 11 January 2006 press release “Reshaping Nikon's Film Camera Assortment" http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/micro_stories.pl?ACCT=130907&TICK=NIKON&STORY=/www/story/01-11-2006/0004247596&EDATE=Jan+11,+2006 retrieved 22 February 2006 [The exact term used by Nikon Inc. (USA) in this press release to describe the serious non-professional photographer is "dedicated amateur."]
* Toyoda, Kenji. "Nikon Family Cousins; Part 9: Nikon FM"  http://www.nikon.co.jp/main/eng/portfolio/about/history/cousins/cousins09-e.htm  retrieved 22 February 2006
Paul1513 18:13, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: I believe that the titanium shutter came with the FM2, along with a higher maximum speed.  That the FM is stainless-steel.  Also, I thought that FM uses a silicon photodiode.  The GaAsP would be the red LEDs in the viewfinder.  I don't have references for either, though. Gah4 (talk) 23:59, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  corrections?  shutter and diodes?
Category talk:Cemeteries

message: Should these be categorized as cemeteries or should a new category be created?  Westminster Abbey, for example, is famous as a tomb for many notables, and should have a place in the general category.  "Tombs"? -Willmcw 05:00, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Crypts/tombs/mausoleums/catacombs/and other miscellaneous final resting places
Talk:People's war

message: The term 'People's War' predates the Maoist usage. It was amongst other things used to describe the Soviet war effort during WWII. In India there was a publication titled 'People's War' at the time. --Soman 15:16, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mao? 

message: Mao's methods are usually identified as 'guerilla', but not by Mao himself, not by Western military professionals when they study his military methods.
--GwydionM 19:00, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not just guerilla warfare 

message: User:Soman was quite right by saying "the term 'People's War' predates the Maoist usage". The concept of people's war was created long before Mao was born. The Patriotic War of 1812, the Russian name for Napoleon's invasion to Russia, was called People's War already in the 19th century. Clausewitz has a chapter in his book (from 1832) about the subject. The Great Patriotic War (The Russian name for the Soviet-German war during the WWII) was named after it's Napoleonic predecessor, which was then called The First Patriotic War of 1812. The pre-Maoist concept should be mentioned in WIkipedia too. --Ukas (talk) 16:36, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, it was also a feature of the French Revolutionary Wars and the Levée en masse.Leutha (talk) 01:59, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

text: It was also the position of the German National Bolsheviks in 1919. 19:55, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  People's War of Russia 1812, and Clausewitz 

message: Hi. I think that there should be a section detailing the history of the Yugoslav conception of the people's war doctrine that emerged independently from Mao and stemmed from the WW2 partisan experience. Not an expert on the subject, but I see it mentioned semi-regularly in literature. Quote from an article I was reading today that spurred this edit:
Andro124 (talk) 21:43, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  People's War in Yugoslav doctrine
Talk:Neuroscience

message: for everyone's convenience im going to copy/paste the comments made by the user: Wretchskull upon review of this article.
Comments from Wretchskull:
1) Multiple sentences and paragraphs are unreferenced. 
2) References and information about modern neuroscience can almost certainly be updated. Searching "Neuroscience" on google scholar shows 64,000 results in 2021 alone. (done!!!)
3) Some subsections contain a few or just one sentence, such as "Artificial neuron implants". (done!!!)
4) The table in the "Major branches" section only has three references for three branches.  (done!!!)
Feel free to use the WP:LIB and WP:RX. Good luck! - Wretchskull (talk) 16:47, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  peer revew results. 

message: Clinical neuroscience is a branch of neuroscience that focuses on the study of the mechanisms that underlie diseases and disorders, so I think the definition of the term Neuroscience should include something about this concept. For example, "Neuroscience is the scientific study of the nervous system... , its functions and its disorders"
What do you think? Gcascas (talk) 21:32, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Is now done. Gcascas (talk) 23:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  definition 

message: — Assignment last updated by Isabelsteffes (talk) 17:21, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: LLIB 1115 - Intro to Information Research

message: Are the neuroscience of learning and education systems, and 'neurodiversity in education' areas of research / science?
Or what area do those come under? 2A0A:EF40:91C:2801:3AC0:FFD4:2029:9517 (talk) 19:20, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Learning & education
Talk:Parti national populaire

message: Do we know that the PNP was créditiste? While it is reasonable to assuem that Roy held the créditiste beliefs he demonstrated before and after the PNP, what about Choquette? He was a former Liberal minister. Kevintoronto 10:42, 9 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: According to Fabien Roy's autobiography, and according to this website : http://www.quebecpolitique.com/partis/pnp.html , the answer to the first question is yes.  As for Choquette, I don't know.  My impression, from what I've read, is that the social credit monetary theory was not particularly emphasized in the party's 1976 campaign. — ABCXYZ (talk) 20:55, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I scanned the Gazette for the 1976 election, and found only references to liberalism, and nothing on social credit. Ground Zero | t 21:02, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: While editors may be anxious to move this article to an English language form of the name, please note that it is incorrect to do so:
Wikipedia:Naming_conventions says 
:Use the most easily recognized name: Generally, article naming should prefer what the greatest number of English speakers would most easily recognize, with a reasonable minimum of ambiguity, while at the same time making linking to those articles easy and second nature.... Wikipedia determines the recognizability of a name by seeing what verifiable reliable sources in English call the subject.
:Use common names of persons and things: Convention: Except where other accepted Wikipedia naming conventions give a different indication, use the most common name of a person or thing that does not conflict with the names of other people or things; use the naming conflict guideline when there is a conflict. Where articles have descriptive names, the given name must be neutrally worded and must not carry POV implications.
:Use English words: Convention: Name your pages in English and place the native transliteration on the first line of the article, unless the native form is more commonly recognized by readers than the English form. The choice between anglicized and native spellings should follow English usage (e.g., Besançon, Søren Kierkegaard and Göttingen, but Nuremberg, delicatessen, and Florence). Often this will be the local version, as with Madrid. Sometimes the usual English version will differ somewhat from the local form as in Franz Josef Strauss; and rarely, as with Mount Everest, it will be completely different.
WP:CANSTYLE is even more specific than WP:NC on this point.  Unless there is a widely used and recognized English-language version of the name, use the official French-language version. 
Thank you. Ground Zero | t 05:24, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article title
Talk:Program (The Animatrix)

message: I have removed the stub tag, because I don't feel that this article needs much more information. If you disagree, then please ignore me. PhilHibbs 10:56, 9 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Patent attorney

message: I think it would be relevant to create a new section entitled "Role", following the section "Terminology" and add the following findings from a reliable source (scholarly paper). What do you think? (I have a COI with de Rassenfosse. (See my userpage))
: Done  PK650 (talk) 07:20, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requesting an edit 

message: A study analyzing patent examination decisions at major patent offices shows that patent attorney firms play a crucial role in the prosecution process, especially in less codified and rapidly changing technology areas such as ICT. AM13prime (talk) 09:46, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Role
Talk:2004 in British music

message: :Done some of the above. violet/riga (t) 20:28, 9 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Made a few more suggestions.  I still think a month-by-month format would be best, I'll have a go at it sometime in my own user area and let you know when it's done. David 5000 12:02, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I tried doing that whereby each month would have it's own table of number ones.  Unfortunately it looked horrible with the columns being different widths over the different tables.  Doing it with a monthly summary would probably be better, but I avoided that because of the sheer lack of information in the article right now. violet/riga (t) 12:53, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Historicity of the Bible/New version

message: I like the look of the new version so far. One quibble though is your use of the word "scientific". Can I suggest that you change this to "academic" or "scholarly"? I think that this is probably less contentious, as many people have a narrower definition of the word scientific than your usage of the word allows.  --G Rutter 13:23, 9 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Could you expand that a bit? I think the Poepperian view of what constitutes science is the most common, and by that (both) views are definitely scientific. So I would like to better understand what the contention is about. (BTW, I much prefer "academic" to the vague "scholarly"). Gady 14:46, 9 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Scientific v Academic
Talk:Gwaelod-y-Garth

message: The photo I added is pretty crappy, but I had it lying around so I thought I may as well. Feel free to replace it with a better one if you have it. Varitek 13:25, 9 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Requested articles/science

message: Someone should make articles about graviscalar, graviphoton and X boson. Particle physicist, where are you?
Henri Tapani Heinonen 13:33, 9 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Important

message: After some serious effort, I merged every request made in the page into either Wikipedia:Requested_articles/Mathematical_and_Natural_Sciences or Wikipedia:Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences.
Oh, and I sorted the requests alphabetically.
It was very tedious.
And I had no coffee.
ClockworkTroll 07:00, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge completed
Talk:Rochechouart impact structure

message: Someone may want to apply crater template

--YakbutterT (talk) 23:33, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add Crater Infobox? 

message: The name of this article needs to be corrected to "Rochechouart impact structure". This not an :impact crater, which is the topographic expression of an impact. In case of the Rochechouart impact structure, the original topographic expression of the impact, its crater, has been long since been destroyed by erosion leaving only the deformed bedrock , which is the :impact structure, behind. 
In addition, the geologic map in this article lacks a legend and cannot find one in original image at crater map.png Paul H. (talk) 18:13, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The name of this article needs to be corrected to "Rochechouart impact structure"