Talk:Geology of the Death Valley area

message: Forgive my ignorance, but why does the article read "1700 million years ago" instead of "1.7 billion years ago"?  Is that a common use in geology? --Ignis33 17:03, August 8, 2005 (UTC)
:Yes, very common. 'Billion' is also a bit ambiguous. --mav 00:18, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding timelines 

message: The first image seems rather lame.  I have another image which is an oblique shaded-relief of Death Valley which might be better.  If anyone is interested I'll upload to WikiCommons. - J. Johnson (JJ) (talk) 22:58, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Less lame is always good. :) --mav (reviews needed) 05:52, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: So perhaps this may be of some interest.  I think it will work even at reduced scale. I'll see about uploading some references in a day or three. - J. Johnson (JJ) (talk) 23:37, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  New image? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Geology of the Death Valley area. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110808230147/http://www.nature.nps.gov/geology/USGSNPS/deva/devastrat.html to http://www2.nature.nps.gov/geology/usgsnps/deva/devastrat.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:45, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Geology of the Death Valley area. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041028115611/http://www2.nature.nps.gov/geology/usgsnps/deva/OFR99-153b.pdf to http://www2.nature.nps.gov/geology/usgsnps/deva/OFR99-153b.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:54, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I've replaced the non-working archive url with the url to the current page for downloading the document. Mikenorton (talk) 20:22, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Looks like it has significant unsourced content. Needs some work to get back to FA criteria. (t · c) buidhe 03:01, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: It needs some significant updating, which I will be aiming to do over the next week or so. Mikenorton (talk) 20:26, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  FA criteria 

message: I agree with J Johnson that the current image at the head of the article is underwhelming, although I appreciate that it does cover the whole area. Sticking with NASA satellite images, I came across this image, which keeps the coverage, but has significantly more impact. Mikenorton (talk) 20:51, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead image