lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Lisfranc injury

message: "Lisfranc Fractures are classified by Hardcastle who was Lisfranc's assistant in the Napoleanic Wars.  Hardcastle utilized rudimentary radiographs to quantify the degree of dislocation of the metatarsals."  I deleted these sentences because no sources are given, it's unclear who this Hardcastle is, and radiography postdates the Napoleonic Wars.  If there's some basis for these statements, please cite sources.
I removed 

Because it was broken.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.107.0.81 (talk) 19:49, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Hardcastle

message: Is it necessary to list 6 different American football players that have suffered the injury?  I'm not sure what it adds to the article. No other individuals are listed in the entire article, aside from Lisfranc himself.
 63.101.88.126 (talk) 19:40, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference to specific football players
Talk:National Counties Cricket Championship

message: Why was this the case? Loganberry (Talk) 02:22, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure and I might have the years mixed up but I think there was a controversy involving Sydney Barnes who was playing for Staffordshire CCC then; as a result the title could not be awarded.  Need to find it somewhere: I'll make a note and report back if anything turns up.  --BlackJack | talk page 20:47, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  1912 - in abeyance?
Talk:How Would a Patriot Act?

message: "...providing well-researched citations from Supreme Court decisions, Congressional statements, and even writings by the Founding Fathers of the United States that are still much too relevant today." Doesn't the "much too" part of the article show a bias, and it would be perhaps better to say "...still relevant today." or perhaps "...still very relevant today." assuming that the relevancy is not in contention?
:Point taken, article adjusted.--SarekOfVulcan 06:21, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Sandspit Airport

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. Let's revisit this a couple months down the road per WP:NAMECHANGE.  – robertsky (talk) 12:43, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Sandspit Airport →  – The name has been officially changed. I support the name change, but I suspect that many people will still call the airport Sandspit Airport or YZP. See this announcement:  Eastmain (talk • contribs) 03:16, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 9 April 2024
Talk:RAF Church Fenton

message: Can someone sort out http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:RAF_Church_Fenton I think I got confused between this one and another airfield near Sherburn-in-Elmet, which I don't know the name of.Oranjblud (talk) 01:19, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Commons

message: As a pilot at Church Fenton 1965-66, I remember the RNEFTS being at RAF Linton-upon-Ouse. I wonder if it was ever at Church Fenton Rupert Butler (talk) 15:15, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: RNEFTS
Talk:Seville Airport

message: I can't find any references that call this San Pablo Airport. It's always just Seville Airport. Why is this article titled 'San Pablo Airport'? Colonies Chris (talk) 12:48, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: It's the old name. It had not been called that for at least 15 years. I tried moving the page but I cannot do so by myself. --Phagopsych (talk) 07:58, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  San Pablo 

message: I think it would be a good thing to have the article include information about the aircraft manufacturing activity that has taken place there. YSSYguy (talk) 17:15, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aircraft manufacturing
Talk:2007 UEFA European Under-17 Championship qualifying round

message: 3rd place table
Hey, it's supposed to be the results against the top 2 teams ONLY, so please don't change it ok? --Scaryice 02:26, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Sam Ratulangi International Airport

message: Apparently some anonymous user keep insisting that there are chartered routes to China operated by Chinese airlines flying from the airport. However, I have check each of the the airlines' website to find out that these route does not exist. I need other users to intervene in this issue so that it can be resolved as soon as possible. Cheers. Calvin Wisanto (talk) 16:44, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Chartered routes to China
Talk:Salzburg Airport

message: Can someone tell me what's happened to Ryanair's route to Dublin? (Footyfanatic3000 (talk) 18:25, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dublin 

message: Has anyone got any sources on the fact that many aircraft are redirected to Salzburg from Innsbruck airport during bad weather?  80.0.170.230 (talk) 21:14, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirected flights from Innsbruck
Talk:RAF Kuala Lumpur

message: If I am not mistaken, RAF Kuala Lumpur is now RMAF Kuala Lumpur in Sungai Besi ( - article in Malay language) but am not very sure how to incorporate that into this article. Any ideas? -- Bob K 11:53, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Current Status RAF Kuala Lumpur

message: Can we link to what explains the Malayan Emergency? RJFJR 15:09, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Malayan Emergency
Talk:RAF Lossiemouth

message: A map would be very helpful for this article.  Especially one showing contextual position in the UK and the location of the (public-information, not govmt. secret) restricted flight areas in the Murray Firth, etc.  I've added a {reqmap} tag. N2e (talk) 15:07, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map would be helpful 

message: What is a "QRA force"?  What does "which was stood up at Leuchars in March 2011" mean?  What is an "AC Squadron"?  Deipnosophista (talk) 11:15, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: New material needs expansion

message: Did a quick ce, tidied a few typos, converted units of measurement changed to isbn-13s. Left a couple of <> for doubtful items. Rv as desired.Keith-264 (talk) 13:02, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  CE 

message: I've removed the following statement from the facilities section as it was identified as being unreferenced in the A-class review "Hangar K20, which was located beside the southern boundary of the airfield, was demolished in 2010. One L-type at the north of the airfield and a Bellman type (hangar 5) were demolished in the 2000s."
When comparing the WW2 airfield map in Jim Hughes book on Lossiemouth with current satellite images its evident that above is the case. However I can't find any published sources to use as references. Thx811 (talk) 18:54, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Demolished Hangars 

message: The station commanders list is incomplete and therefore been removed from the article as recommended in the GA review. I've left the list here so that in can be added to and hopefully moved back to the article when complete. Thx811 (talk) 18:10, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Station Commanders
Talk:Saint John Airport

message: I take it that we are both using Transport Canada TP 577 - Aircraft Movement Statistics Annual Report 2006.
I'm not sure if you mean page 27 as numbered in the document or page 27 as shown in the pdf reader but either way the 37,834 is not correct.
If you mean page 27 as shown in the pdf reader then that is for "Table 1, Total Aircraft Movements by Class of Operation" for airports with "NAV CANADA Towers". There is an aiport on that page with 37,834 movements in 2006 but it's Saint-Jean Airport (not Saint John Airport) in Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu, Quebec. 
If you mean page 27 as numbered in the document then that is "Table 6, Itinerant Movement by Weight Group" for airports with "NAV CANADA Towers". That page starts with Hamilton and ends with Montreal/St-Hubert.
This airport is covered in "Section II, Airports with Flight Service Stations". Saint John Airport is in "Table 8, Total Aircraft Movements by Class of Operation" for airports with "Flight Service Stations" and is either page 43 as numbered in the document or page 65 as shown in the pdf reader and shows the figure of 20,631. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 19:08, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Aircraft movements

message: I have removed the statement that the airport is running a $1.5 million deficit, which was added (and then had a "citation needed" tag placed on it) in October 2013. I cannot find secondary sources about this, although I see secondary sources about earlier deficits at the airport. The statement is corroborated to a certain degree in the airport's own annual report for 2013, but there are notes about relevant accounting issues and in any case that is a primary source. Yngvadottir (talk) 19:26, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deficit
Talk:Safdarjung Airport

message: Note:  Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 04:05, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Delhi Addition 

message: I removed the part about Safdarjung Airport being erroneously being depicted in Tintin in Tibet as the other airport. Careful study of the images showed a terminal is only shown once, and that is when the lot are leaving India towards Katmandu, which, as the story goes, should effectively be at Safdarjung Airport (or Willingdon, as it's called in the album). Unless someone can show the terminal depicted in that image clearly isn't Safdarjung's, I don't see where the error is. Jellevc (talk) 13:18, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tintin's visit
Talk:RAF Scampton

message: Can anybody provide some other evidence for the claim that the 'live' bomb used as a gate guard would have "have flattened the entire air base, and much of northern Lincoln (including its cathedral)"?
I know the area reasonably well having driven down the A15 and in to Lincoln more times than I care to remember and I find the idea that 4 tonnes of torpex would have levelled an area at least 8 miles in diameter unlikely to say the least. OK... It's a very big bomb but I think somebody is getting a little bit carried away with themselves.
I know it's hard to make comparisons between two totally dissimilar cities but according to wikipedia the bomb dropped on Hiroshima had a radius of 'total destruction' of around 1 mile. Is it really credible that a ground-burst 4 tonne bomb would cause such carnage to a city of brick and stone when an air-burst 15kilotonne nuclear device did so little (relatively speaking) to a city of paper and wood?? 92.41.38.208 (talk) 23:51, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Live bomb. 

message: The page on the RAF Heraldy Trust is here . The drawing shows the motto to be Armatus non lacessitur, not Armatus non lakeside. The accompanying text states Lakeside, which I think is erroneous. The dictionary of mottoes shows it to be lacessitur. Lakeside doesn't seem very  Latin-y to me. The joy of all things (talk) 21:35, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Good spot! Dormskirk (talk) 21:58, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Motto 

message: Should this entry be amended to describe RAF Scampton in the past tense as it has had an official closing ceremony on 6th September 2022? I understand that the station will continue to operate until around March 2023 but this will chiefly consist of moving equipment and personnel out and decomissioning the site. I can find no report that there will be another "Official" recognition of the actual day Scampton will cease to be an RAF station. Funeralrob (talk) 12:55, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The BBC article indicates that closure has been scheduled for December 2022. Dormskirk (talk) 13:08, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, The question is really about when is it closed? When it is officially closed Lincolnshire Live article or when it ceases operations - Later in the same article. (Or even when its land will be offered "Vacant posession" on or before 31st March 2023). In context of wikipedia's entries being Encyclopedic in nature. Funeralrob (talk) 13:29, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: My view is that it is closed when it is stated to be closed by MoD (not the date of the closing ceremony, and not the date that it is offered for vacant possession either). Dormskirk (talk) 15:07, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official closure
Talk:Robin Guthrie

message: The original version of this page is a copyright violation of http://www.cocteautwins.com/html/theband/robin_guthrie.html (as is noted in the "Works Cited" section, actually: "All content, information, images courtesy of cocteautwins.com").  Most of the content is still too similar to that page.  I don't quite understand if it's OK to have copyvio text in the history but it looks like it is (from WP:COPYVIO).  So I'm just going to try to clean it up and rewrite all the copied parts.  Any advice is appreciated though; I hate copyright law. ("Courtesy" could even mean the content was used with permission, but I don't see any other evidence of it...) --Galaxiaad 02:33, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:RAF St Mawgan

message: Glad someone has started to update this article - but it needs to be completely re-written to make sense (as at the moment it contradicts itself.)
Infernoradio (talk) 11:41, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Switch to Civil Airport 

message: The article doesn't cover much on the Nimrod's long service from the base. 86.159.72.67 (talk) 19:24, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nimrod 
Talk:Rzeszów–Jasionka Airport

message: How far is the airport, from the border with Ukraine? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:39, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: check google maps! looks like  <100 km to border.102.70.64.56 (talk) 17:26, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distance to Ukraine 

message: I wonder if this article could do with a new section regarding it’s role as part of the Ukrainian war with Russia.
I’m not great at creating new content but there seems to be good content in the below articles that could be useful:
https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/a-polish-airport-that-became-the-worlds-link-to-ukraine/
https://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/the-trials-of-rzeszow-a-polish-town-learns-to-live-with-war-on-its-doorstep-a-60030b41-1933-4186-845b-7526402ac03e
https://www.key.aero/article/polish-airport-near-ukraine-border-could-be-key-defence-support-hub
I’m going to put in a  tag to see if anyone is interested. Jo Jc Jo (talk) 11:49, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: That tag is for simple questions about editing Wikipedia, not things like this. You could ask at a relevant WikiProject, or be bold and do it yourself.  ■ ∃ Madeline ⇔ ∃ Part of me ; 12:09, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  New section on Ukrainian war effort
Talk:RM Chivenor

message: 30/03/09
Minor revisions to the article regarding punctuation and grammar, no real changes to the substance of the article.
However, having flown in gliders from Chivenor, I would question the factual accuracy of certain statements within the article, particularly the capacity of the base to handle C-17s- the largest aircraft operated by the RAF.
Anybody who can verify this or other information, please discuss it.
Any concerns over my editing, please feel free to contact me via Wikipedia.
HJ Mitchell (talk) 14:24, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ramon Airbase

message: The problem is that this article is about exactly the same airfield already referenced as Mitzpe Ramon Airfield. Thus, this one should be completed (there are three runways), its infobox may be 'somewhat' cleaned up, the article should be properly moved to Mitzpe Ramon Airbase to suit its official title and Mitzpe Ramon Airfield should be then deleted. — Іван Коренюк ψ Ivan Korenyuk 14:27, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If you read the external link, they are not the same airfield. Number 57 10:04, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doublet with [[Mitzpe Ramon Airfield]]
Talk:Ratmalana Airport

message: User:Chamath237 has re-named this article from Ratmalana Airport to Colombo Airport without any explanation. I am going to revert. The main policy used to determine an article's title is WP:COMMONNAME. User:Chamath237 / User:Jpchamathdj should establish the common name here before re-naming the article.
A quick Google search for "Colombo Airport" shows that most references to "Colombo Airport" are in fact referring to Bandaranaike International Airport.--obi2canibetalk contr 12:44, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Title 

message: Please change the website to http://www.airport.lk/rma
112.134.1.250 (talk) 10:15, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 14:39, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 26 November 2015 

message: * Can you reomve :File:Colombo Airport Ratmalana Airside View.jpg as it was deleted from commons 9 November 2015 as probable cpy vio - Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 13:27, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Link removed. MilborneOne (talk) 18:02, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 12 December 2015 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: no consensus. After two relists, no one has participated in this discussion. WP:NPASRNo prejudice against speedy renomination. (closed by non-admin page mover)  (t/c) 16:35, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Colombo International Airport, Ratmalana →  – Current title is not the most common one and it's also conflicting with the main international airport in Colombo 2001:878:0:E000:82:E2:A1:33 (talk) 08:44, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

text: Relisting comment: Relisting for a last time to attempt to gain more input, as this move was previously disputed BilledMammal (talk) 16:14, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 11 March 2023 

message: As a follow-up to a page move, a protected redirect, Colombo Airport Ratmalana, Sri Lanka needs to be retargeted and redirect category (rcat) templates added.  Please modify it as follows:
* from this:
#redirect Colombo International Airport, Ratmalana
* to this:
#REDIRECT Ratmalana Airport

* 
The  template is used to sort redirects into one or more categories.  When  and/or  suffice, the Redirect category shell template will detect the protection level(s) and categorize the redirect automatically.  (Also, the categories will be automatically removed or changed when and if protection is lifted, raised or lowered.)  Thank you in advance! P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 01:57, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: * Pppery * it has begun... 02:30, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you very much, editor ! P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 02:41, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fully protected edit request on 3 February 2024
Talk:Rodríguez Ballón International Airport

message: the chilean airline Sky airline features international flights from Arequipa to Arica, Antofagasta, Iquique and Santiago de Chile i added that information from the spanish version
:There is no information about any Peruvian destination on their website, which makes I don't think there exists such a service. Belgian man (talk) 14:01, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, I will keep it like it is now, but it is possible other users will still revert your edit, as no internet source affirms it... (We even don't know from what date your newspaper is, or do you?) Greetings, Belgian man (talk) 18:00, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

text: You're welcome, but like I said, it remains difficult if you don't have a date of that newspaper. We'll see how the situation evolves. Greetings, Belgian man (talk) 18:27, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

text: No, tu inglés no es horrible, lo he preguntado porque me gusta el español, no es tan "bueno" que mi inglés, pero la lengua española es más bonita, y para mí, es un ejercicio bueno :D Belgian man (talk) 21:18, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

text: Veo que Arica es la única destinación directa... No es porque los pasajeros pueden quedarse sentado, que es un vuelo directo: Hay diferentes números de vuelo, pienso. Belgian man (talk) 09:18, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flights of Sky Airlines
Talk:Rochester Airport (Kent)

message: The article could be enhanced by including material about the various manufacturers which have operated from the airport site, e.g. Pobjoy and Shorts, but I expect that there are many others. TraceyR 19:02, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Manufacturers at Rochester Airport

message: The article is titled "Rochester Airport" but I consider this incorrect. It is actually not an airport, since it doesn't meet our definition, having no facilities for commercial air traffic.
I am well aware that the aerodrome operators style themselves "Rochester Airport" but that is irrelevant: if I introduce myself as "Bonaparte, Napoléon", are you going to address me as "Votre Altesse Impériale" :) ? Well you might, to my face, poking fun behind my back, but you wouldn't take it serious, and rightly so.
Thus I intend to rename the article to "Rochester Airfield" or perhaps "Rochester Aerodrome", depending on opinions.
One contributing factor might be the tendency in North-America to call every aviation terrain an "airport" but then this is not North America.
Perhaps there is an "official" procedure to get such a name change discussed, and possibly agreed upon? Jan olieslagers (talk) 15:02, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: "Rochester Airport" is its official name per its website. It also appears to be the most common name, as a G-search on "rochester airfield kent" returned "Rochester Airport" in the first set of returns. It not being an airport in your view would not really be good reason to rename the article. Now if it were a train station or hospital, you might have something.  As to official procedures, see WP:RM#Requesting a single page move. BilCat (talk) 20:39, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It is not a matter of "my opinion", that would be quite a frail argument. No, it is a matter of our own definition of an airport: "An airport is an aerodrome with extended facilities, mostly for commercial air transport" which this place obviously does not meet. There is no customs service, no luggage reclaim area, no check-in counters, nothing, nada. Jan olieslagers (talk) 06:39, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: You asked for my comments, and I gave them. I believe the lead clarifies what the subject is as it calls it a "general aviation aerodrome", and that is sufficient. The exact name doesn't change that, and it would be original research for us to call it something different than its actual name. If it were commonly called "Kent Aerodrome" in reliable published sources, then I'd support a move per WP:COMMONNAME, but that has not been proven yet. While I do have plenty of experience dealing with article titles and moves, I don't generally deal with airport articles. You might ask for more opinions at [[WT:AIRPORT, as they have dealt with this issue before. BilCat (talk) 08:18, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks, I will give in to the "original research" argument, and leave things as they are. Cheers! Jan olieslagers (talk) 08:25, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem. BilCat (talk) 08:34, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming