Talk:Down quark

message: Does anyone know if there are any theories to the possibility that the Down Quark is composed of an Up Quark and an electron?  I once heard that when a Proton and Electron mix it produces a neutron.  So if this is true then if you mix an Up Quark and an electron it must form a down quark...I am not sure though. - BlackWidower
: Please see my answer to this question on Talk:Electron. -- SCZenz 22:22, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: In the intervening 18 years your answer to this question appears to have disappeared.  What happened to it? Vaughan Pratt (talk) 19:19, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind, I found it in Archive 2. Vaughan Pratt (talk) 19:34, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Quark composition

message: If you talk about the particle zoo where more and more discoveries are made each year. wouldn't there infact be a sub particle zoo within each particle of the so-called particle zoo. In other words wouldn't the structure of each particle be composed of a group of smaller particles which would be composed of a sub-group of smaller particles and so on to infinity and beyond? Can a human being visualize what an infinitesimally small particle could be like or not. In other words do we really really really know what it's all about; or just suppose. Carl Kravis
:The term particle zoo refers to all the particles (and thus subparticles). There's only one zoo, although you are free to divide it how you like. The current way of describing the zoo is found in the image I gave. There are six quarks, six leptons and these are the elementary fermion (aka there is nothing "smaller"). Combine quarks in three and you have baryons. Combine quarks in quark-antiquark pairs and you have mesons. Combine baryons together and you have nucleis (exotic or not). Other combinations (the "species" of the particle zoo) have different names. Headbomb {ταλκκοντριβς – WP Physics} 15:42, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Particle zoo

message: if some one can get a hold of C. T. H. Davies, C. McNeile, K. Y. Wong, E. Follana, R. Horgan, K. Hornbostel, G. P. Lepage, J. Shigemitsu, H. Trottier. Precise Charm to Strange Mass Ratio and Light Quark Masses from Full Lattice QCD. Physical Review Letters, 2010; 104 (13): 132003 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.132003 it is purported to have refined values for both qu and qd 
Abyssoft (talk) 04:45, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Before adopting the new value, I'd wait until the PDG adopts them or not for the 2010 review. The PDG makes a thorough independent review of all results on the subject, on basis of which they decide on a best average value. Results from a single method, may have systematic error not advertised in the relevant article. Nonetheless, I expect that the lattice QCD results for the light quark masses will lead to an adjustment of the PDG values. TimothyRias (talk) 06:29, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Reference 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Down quark. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081225093044/http://www.hueuni.edu.vn/hueuni/en/news_detail.php?NewsID=1606&PHPSESSID=909807ffc5b9c0288cc8d137ff063c72 to http://www.hueuni.edu.vn/hueuni/en/news_detail.php?NewsID=1606&PHPSESSID=909807ffc5b9c0288cc8d137ff063c72
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120306065114/http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2010/04/mass-of-the-common-quark-finally.html to http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2010/04/mass-of-the-common-quark-finally.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:33, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The body of this article is extremely similar to the body of Up quark, so I suspect that someone copied-and-pasted one from the other then changed the masses and such. Is this okay? Care to differ or discuss with me? The Nth User 03:53, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes? Why wouldn't it be? Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 04:47, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Similarity with [[Up quark]]