Talk:Livio C. Stecchini

message: àI removed the following reference:
*A critique of details in Stecchini's metrology
It is a pseudoscientists critique of Stecchini's already pseudoscientific metrology. -- Egil 13:18, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why have these tags been added when there is no discussion of any such problem on this discussion page???  Ian Cairns 00:12, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup and dispute

message: Egil, why do you say this? I don't disagree, necessarily, but I don't entirely agree, either. It would seem to belong more in Pseudoscientific metrology.
Ken talk|contribs 17:11, August 30, 2005 (UTC)
:Perhaps - but I must say I believe it describes his approach pretty well - and it is not taken out of context - if you read his texts on metrum.org I think you'd agree it is typical. I have tried to improve NPOV in the added comments, further improvement is appreciated. But on the other hand NPOV should go hand in hand with critical.  And really, how can a typical quote be POV? Of course, if someone would find another quote in another contexts that shows another facet of the man, then thats brilliant.  -- Egil 19:21, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: The quote on his insight in metrology must be included

message: Rktect just wiped out all statements critical to Stecchini:
My trust in the content rktect produces is at absolute zero, but it someone is willing to verify everything rktect wrote and merge with existing more critical content, I have no problem with that. -- Egil 15:31, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  New attack 

message: Some research shows that Stecchini took a law degree at the University of Genoa, then a PhD at Harvard University. I've found mention that he taught at the University of Chicago and William Patterson State College in Patterson, New Jersey, and Rktect asserts that he taught at Harvard and MIT. This needs to get worked into the bio.
Ken talk|contribs 01:28, September 1, 2005 (UTC)
:Kenneth Kitchen and Werner Jaeger are real enough. -- Egil 08:04, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Educational institutions 

message: The latest rkteck edit simply wiped out the main indicators of pseudoscience: An elevated ego and lack of self-criticism, and claims of being ignored by fellow scientists. Since Stecchini hands out proof of this on a silver platter in form of quotes, this is certainly not POV.
If anyone thinks something from this latest edit is worth integrating, then go ahead:  -- Egil 08:04, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why revert? 

message: This guy is notable. He may be notable as a crank, but he he notable and he's gotten the public atention to show it. This page is the place to argue about his bio--the length or the discussion should have demonstrated that it's not a qy of deletion but NPOV which is a qy of editingDGG 03:20, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: probable pseudoscience

message: :12.187.94.246 and similar IP's are socks of banned and blocked . See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rktect. Dougweller (talk) 07:34, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Sockpuppet edits

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Livio Catullo Stecchini. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060811212945/http://www.nexusjournal.com/Reynolds.html to http://www.nexusjournal.com/Reynolds.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:14, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified