lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Theatrum Orbis Terrarum

message: Text more relevant here than where found in Martin Heilwig, regarding his 1561 map of Silesia: 
* The cartouche is bearing this date, although the map at hand was published by Abraham Ortelius in the first edition of his "Theatrum Orbis Terrarum" only in 1570 and 1571. In later editions this map was replaced by a slightly modified map by the same author (posthumously). An ornate border was added and some of the geographical and spelling mistakes eliminated. Since this map was published only in the two first editions it is very rare.    
*This atlas by Abraham Ortelius including the published Heilwig map "Theatrum Orbis Terrarum" was the first time undertaking of creating a world atlas. 
--Jerzy•t 06:05, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is this the conventional rendering of the Latin title?
Because the Latin, of course, reads Theatre of the Lands of the World.
Varlaam (talk) 06:10, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Theatre of the World'' {{sic}}
Talk:Waterville Valley, New Hampshire

message: I removed the section on the resort because a) there was no name of the resort mentioned, and b) it read too much like an ad.  If there substantial information on this item (maybe a link in the "External Links" section?) let's restore it. -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 03:35, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There should be a new article for "Waterville Valley Resort" (or whatever its official name is).  See Ragged Mountain Resort for an idea of the sort of information that goes in there.  --Ken Gallager 13:55, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resort
Talk:Anti-Christianity in the modern era

message: I was browsing the religion stubs, and this line caught my eye: "Anti-Christianity is the criticism of the Christian religion based on mischaracterizations, stereotypes, and negative prejudices."  The assumption here that any criticism of Christianity must be based on false premises seemed offbase and not at all NPOV to me.  The article cites no sources, and we already have articles on Criticism of Christianity and Persecution of Christians, so I would suggest that it be merged into one of those - probably Criticism of Christianity, as I think a redirect from here to there would be pretty natural.  If I don't hear anything else by the end of the week, I'm going to go ahead with that. - AdelaMae (talk - contribs) 06:18, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Then we should merge & redirect it to Christianophobia, the way that Anti-French redirects to Francophobia. Regardless, people could legitimately take "anti-Christianity" as being any view that is opposed to Christianity on whatever grounds, and what this article currently does is characterize all such views as misguided and prejudicial. - AdelaMae (talk - contribs) 18:15, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

message: What if we merged this article and Christianophobia into a new article called Anti-Christian prejudice? Christianophobia (which is something of a neologism and limited in meaning) could have its own section.  We could make the opening sentence more NPOV by saying something like "Anti-Christian prejudice is criticism of or bias against Christians and the Christian religion, based on mischaracterization, stereotype, and negative prejudice or caricature."   
This would restrict this new article to a usage similar to those of homophobia, racism, etc, while still leaving Criticism of Christianity for rational and philosophical disagreements.
Thus, "The bodily resurrection of Jesus is not a scientific fact" is a (debateable) statement of fact, while "Christians are idiots for believing that Jesus rose from the dead" is anti-Christian prejudice.  JHCC  (talk) 15:55, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, I wish I'd thought of that!  That makes it much more clear how the scope of this article would be different from Criticism of Christianity and Persecution of Christians.  I know some books we could reference for Christian opinions on this issue. - AdelaMae (talk - contribs) 16:56, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for supporting the idea.  Just to note:  I'm not saying, "the resurrection was not a scientific fact."  Rather, to say, "The bodily resurrection of Jesus is not a scientific fact" is to make a statement of fact (that is, it is a claim that this is is a fact, whether it is or not).  JHCC  (talk) 21:10, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: A new suggestion
Talk:CJSR-FM

message: The history section sounds alot to me like a CJSR promo/fan club page.   I think It should be looked at from other points of view. 129.128.62.213 04:50, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Here's an example of outright bias: "For more than 20 years, CJSR has been Edmonton's independent and alternative radio station, bringing style and substance to a medium that has become increasingly commodified and controlled by big business." Please avoid that. Thanks. RPM 17:15, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: History

message: I've rewritten the article in what I consider to be a more neutral fashion.  Accordingly, I have removed the neutrality disputed tag.  If you re-add it, please explain your concerns here. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 07:58, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality tag
Talk:Gillette Cup New Zealand Secondary Schools Cricket

message: From the AfD for this article occurring, as per User:I Jethrobot.
*http://www.voxy.co.nz/sport/jacob-oram-helps-celebrate-gillette-cup-20th-anniversary/5/33016 
*articles about celebrating the cup's 20th anniversary.
*Quotes directly about the notability of Gillette Cup such as, "More than 60 players who have made the finals (at the Gillette Cup) have gone on to play first-class cricket, with 14 eventually playing for the Black Caps." or, "The Gillette Cup provides so much opportunity for schools to be involved.", or that teams as referred to as "Gillette Cup Holders". 
: Northamerica1000(talk) 08:19, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: References that may be incorporated into this article
Talk:CKSA-FM

message: Please note that radio station articles are titled with their legal Industry Canada-issued, CRTC-mandated call signs, not with their on air brand names. If the station has dropped CKSA-FM as its call sign, then please provide a source that confirms a new call sign in the CXXX-FM format — but this article does not move to "95.9 LLOYD FM", as that isn't the station's call sign. Bearcat (talk) 07:03, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: LLOYD FM
Talk:0.999.../Archive 3

message: You know, it occurred to me, the only reason some people go on about this is because they evoke a response. If you just ignore them, they'll soon get tired of tilting at windmills alone. I see little point in continuing dialogue with people who repeatedly demonstrate they don't understand what they're talking about. I suppose it does no inherent harm for a wikipedia talk page to descend to the level of pop math discussion lists, but it's certainly a waste of valuable time. The following fact is without dispute in the mathematical community:
*In the complete ordered field of real numbers, assuming nonconstructive arguments (i.e. proof by contradiction), it is a true statement that (9/10) + (9/100) + ... = 1. Given me an epsilon, and I can find a N, (I think it should be something around − log10 epsilon), such that all the partial sums past N lie within epsilon of 1. That is the definition of the sum of an infinite series of real numbers. To dispute this, you're either ignorant of the definitions or don't understand them.
Now, it is true that there are other ways of interpreting the equation. But, given the above context, it is a true statement. If you interpret the statement in the system of hyperreals, where infinitisemals exist, then it is not true, if you "interpret" it the right way. But, that is a different question. If it's sunny out and I ask you if it's sunny out today, and you say "No", and I say "what do you mean", and you say, "because it's raining 5,000 miles away", that doesn't prove it's not sunny, just that you didn't answer the question properly.
As for the link to the constructivist, you are entering another realm. He doesn't even accept proof by contradiction. So, again, this isn't relevant. Revolver 05:15, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I've lost track... Which "link to the constructivist" are you referring to? Melchoir 05:37, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

text: Even using hyperreal numbers, one still has 9*[0.999...]=10*[0.999...]-[0.999...]=[9.999...]-[0.999...]=9, so [0.999...]=1. But one can construct 0.999...9 with an i-large number of digits, which is really smaller than 1 and larger than any standard real<1. That is, it has a positive, but i-small distance to 1.--LutzL 09:46, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  An observation
Talk:CIBK-FM

message: Looking at the Internet Archive Wayback Machine, their logo had [a line over the 5 which was later changed to "FM" . It's hard to say when that was or how the resulting name(s) should be stylized in text. --Addict 2006 16:47, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vibe 98.5 name stylization
Talk:Electronic Piano

message: Is this a disambig? --Unforgettableid | talk to me 06:46, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

message: Electronic piano links here. It should be the other way around (rules of style) and I am making it so. Granted the article talks about Electronic Piano as a trade name, but, as the article states, this is a misnomer. The main point of the article is to describe an instrument. --Trweiss 17:59, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Moving from Electronic Piano to Electronic piano
Talk:The Up-Late Game Show

message: I am personally going to to start a movement to have this "Supposed" game show closed down. I have watched this show on many an occasion and also rang (well at least attempted ) to ring in for the competitions only to find that this show and the subsequent station are insulting mine and everyone elses intelligence by not actually taking calls for questions unless the game timer or game is either over or nearly over. It is a major fass and I intened to make it clear to all the public what is happening. To Hotdogs and Rob how can you two consciencesly do this show knowing it is basically a big rip off. I strive to expose you two and this show for the ridiculous thing it is.I find it curious to see that this TV cahnnel will happily do a story on the Police having cameras to revenue raise and yet this very show is doing the very same......I will expose you and this show for what it is until such time as it is removed from TV.
I really hope you succeed Samatic 19:27, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Me too. Bronzey 11:54, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The best way to get rid of it is by not watching. And definitely not calling!! Asa01 20:19, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  This show is an absolute fass 

message: Anyone take detailed notes of every episode ?
I have (not all episodes), and would like to exchange data with anyone out there.
I have also created computer programmes that help solve some of the games.
139.130.36.190 05:44, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Detailed fans of TUGS
Talk:Megaloptera

message: As I already pointed pointed out on the Raphidioptera and WikiProject Arthropods talk pages, there is a lack of consistency in taxonomic orders between the Neuroptera, Raphidioptera and Megaloptera articles. The different classifications given are as follows :
*Neuroptera : superorder = Endopterygota , order = Neuroptera , suborders = Megaloptera + Raphidioptera
*Megaloptera : superorder = Endopterygota , order = Megaloptera
*Raphidioptera : superorder = Neuroptera , order = Raphidioptera
I would like to change the taxoboxes of the Raphidioptera and Megaloptera articles so that the classifications are the same as the one on the Neuroptera article. The text can explain the alternative classifications, but for the sake of clarity and uniformity I think that the three articles should feature the same taxonomy. Tell me if there is any opposition to making this change. IronChris  |  (talk) 04:34, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Taxomomic confusion
Talk:CITR-FM

message: I fixed the disambiguation link Hermetic to the Argentine heavy-metal band Hermética in the section CITR-FM#SHiNDiG (as the only band on the disambiguation page). This claim is still unsourced, as I could find no supporting material on the net. The entire section needs citations. Bubka42 (talk) 05:33, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation
Talk:Fragments of Freedom

message: I've changed the title of a song from "In The Hands Of The Godz" to "In The Hands Of The Gods" acording to the official webpage:
http://www.morcheeba.co.uk/view.php?template=normal&page_id=10
Does the title song allude to Led Zeppelin's Stairway to heaven? The first two meters of the melody sound like that to me. Happily ever after 02:27, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed this claim, which was added by User:Tartabrasileira. I do agree that there is a strong similarity between the two songs, both in chord progression and in instrumentation (it's at 1:20 - 1:45 if anyone wants to have a listen): however, the claim borders on an accusation of plagiarism, and wikipedia doesn't want to be getting caught up in libel actions. If somebody has a source to back up the claim (a denial from Morcheeba an accusation from one of the members of Led Zeppelin or something) then that can be incorporated into the article  Dom Kaos (talk) 21:18, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Resistance temperature detector

message: From reading the discussion below, it seems like this is no longer an issue, BUT thermistors and RTD's are NOT the same thing. They operate using the same principle ("large" changes resistance in resistance vs. temperature) but have very different response curves as can be seen on the fourth page of the application notes from General Electric's Thermometrics Division  (http://www.gesensing.com/products/resources/whitepapers/ntcnotes.pdf). Not only are the actual physics underlying the resistance changes and the materials they are made from very different, but they are also sold as distinct devices by manufacturers. I think, therefore, that the tag for a merger of Resistance Temperature Device and Thermistor should definitely be removed. I feel like Resistance Temperature Device and Resistance thermometer should be merged though because Platinum Resistance Thermometers are definitely the largest subclass of RTD's. - Dborrero 15:50, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Try RTD temperature on Google: 1.2 million hits, plus 8 ads for buying them. Or RTD Pt (750 thousand). Google should not be trusted for multi-word searches, because skipping to results page 99 will show that Resistance thermometer actually has 768 hits, RTD temperature 734 hits, and RTD Pt 732 hits. Han-Kwang 07:59, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Google breaks down when you do this. It cannot be trusted to give anything close to the true number unique results when they are more than two or three hundred. Actually, even that many can be questionable. The problem can most easily be seen by searching for an extremely common word, like "home" or "the". According to Google, there are only 919 unique results out of 19.2 billion for "home" and 688 unique results out of 23.8 billion for "the". Another problem is that you are not using quotes, which helps to exclude irrelevant results when using multiple search terms. -- Kjkolb 12:42, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Never too old to learn something new... I checked a catalog for electronics and process control hardware (RS components) and they had yet another term than the two we're discussing here. Han-Kwang 22:07, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge from R.T. Device

message: Strain gages use exactly the same wiring configurations as RTDs.
So should I copy the wiring configuration diagrams to strain gauge?
Or should I move them to resistance measurement (or Wheatstone bridge), since it seems redundant to copy them into every article that involves precision resistance measurement?
p.s.: Dear Psanderson,
nice job with those wiring digrams.
--68.0.120.35 04:17, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  wiring configurations 

message: When clicking the "talk" tab to get to this page from the Resistance Thermometer page it results in a page saying the page cannot be found. Only by typing http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Resistance_temperature_detector into the address bar can I access this page. I have no idea how to fix this. Cheers 217.34.222.220 (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 14:16, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resistance Thermometer TALK
Talk:Stella

message: I have no clue how this works, but Stella can also refer to the stone tablet found between the paws of the Sphinx in Egypt...
*you mean stele. Chris 05:05, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

message: I suggest a link in the chapter "Computing" to Barry Richmond / STELLA / Think modelling environment for simulation. Lego_Tom Nov.23.2010
stella may also derivate from the word "steel"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.28.42.11 (talk) 18:42, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion of a link to Barry Richmond / STELLA/IThink modelling environment for simulation 

message: Shouldn't this page be moved to "Stella (disambiguation)" ?  GeeTeeBee (talk) 13:08, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to "Stella (disambiguation)" ? 

message: Seems that this page should have a link to the geometric shape stella octangula, the first and only stellation of the octahedron.  Mordomo (talk) 08:00, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another suggestion: stella octangula
Talk:List of ChuckleVision episodes

message: TreasuryTag Felt the need to delete the entire episode listing I created for series 21. With the accusation "Don't add unsourced shit to articles. Why is this difficult for you to understand?." For your information, This information is sourced from the CBBC website at www.bbc.co.uk/cbbc which quite clearly gives episode listings for the week ahead and the episodes are tagged as 1/6, 2/6 etc. I added this detail into the 'edit summary' box to summise where this information was sourced. Yet the user still chose to delete it. The BBC website (producers of chucklevision) IS proof that there are SIX episodes in series 21 and the titles of each episode are factual and correct. Instead of deleting details, perhaps TreasuryTag should get his facts straight before changing things. A complaint about this user will be made to Wikipedia.
--92.3.120.250 (talk) 23:13, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Series 21 (2009) 

message: The episode descriptions are mainly copied verbatim from here.--Rambutan (talk) 09:58, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007 series
Talk:Michelle Smith (author)

message: Does anyone have any references to Michelle being excommunicated? Michael Voytinsky 07:31, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This should probably be merged with Michelle Remembers - I don't think Smith is known for anything except the book.  WLU (talk) 10:39, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Michelle Smith is known for nothing but being the co-author of Michelle Remembers; redirected.  WLU (talk) 15:46, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Toowong

message: The vast majority of the History appears to be a simple copy and paste job from the two links provided. It needs to be re-worked. -- Adz 07:35, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  History text 

message: I don't think that the aquarium photo belongs in the article. It doesn't add anything to it, and isn't a significant feature of the suburb. If anything if would belong in an article about Toowong Village shopping centre, but even then it isn't significant enough. If there were to be photos in that article they would be of the shopping area, maybe the shopping centre entrance, possibly the food court. I think the fish photo should be taken out. -- Adz 00:20, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The acquarium is a special feature of the Toowong Village Shopping Centre and, as such, deserves its place on the page. Figaro 06:30, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Photo of the aquarium now removed from article.  Figaro 06:52, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aquarium Photo 

message: I've uploaded :Image:Royal Exchange, Brisbane.JPG which can be used when that section gets written. -- Adz 01:10, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Royal Exchange Photo 

message: anyone thought of having a section for a list of large companies that have their australian HQ in Toowong.  most notably  Technology One, Data #3 and Mondial Assistance?
:Be bold, go ahead and add it. I have thought of it just never bothered yet. Should also mention the use of Data 3 centre for new company incubation, funded by the Queensland Government.  Rimmeraj 05:38, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: problem with me being bold is that I suck at this type of formal writing Whitehatnetizen 05:05, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: fair enough. Though the only way to learn is have a go, other editors will always help and clean up the text. I will give it a go at some time. Rimmeraj 06:40, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Companies? 
Talk:FA

message: As used, for example, here [] where it is assumed that everyone should understand? 90.201.187.50 (talk) 08:21, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: For the benefit of future readers with the same question: FA means "featured article", i.e. one of the best pages on Wikipedia.  WP:FA has more details. Typing WP:term in the search box explains many Wikipedia jargon terms. Certes (talk) 18:11, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is FA in Wikipedia? 

message: I am not at all sure all these are reasonably referred to with FA. There are zillions of two-letter f.a. terms. Staszek Lem (talk) 20:01, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup needed
Talk:University of Tennessee at Martin

message: Needs an update, here is some info on enrollment. "More than 6,800 students represent 42 states and 19 countries." The University of Tennessee website, https://www.utm.edu/about-ut-martin/at-a-glance.php Retrieved May 30, 2023. But perhaps something more official or specific is needed to change the article itself? I'll just leave it here on the talk page for now. Donner60 (talk) 09:52, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Enrollment Update May 2023 

message: http://iep.utm.edu Endo999 (talk) 23:49, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  university also hosts the well regarded Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Talk:Volkstümliche Musik

message: If this article doesn't yet sufficiently demostrate that this is manufactured music tailored to an audience through recordings, and not genuine German folk music, then it needs complete rewriting. This is closer to the German equivalent of Nashville Sound.--Wetman 07:58, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: support. The terms are used interchangably in colloquial German anyway. It's mostly belittled because it's cheerfully archaic, not because it's commercialised (heck, modern pop music is no less commercialised than this). 91.0.78.167 14:20, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

text: object. Prudent, well-informed journalists and others tend to distinguish between the two terms in German-speaking countries. Please read the two extensive and articles in the German-speaking Wikipedia. Martg76 17:52, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merge with [[Volksmusik]]

message: The Oom-pah article does not clearly state what oom-pah music is exactly, but it sounds like it's a nickname of some sort for Volkstümliche Musik. Does anyone know more?
Especially the fact that there is no German Wikipedia article about Oom-pah music makes me doubt that this is actually a valid music genre. Chl (talk) 16:13, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Has been resolved (mostly) by a restructuring of Oom-pah. Chl (talk) 11:52, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merge from [[Oom-pah]]