lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Basslink

message: This info is missing: to export electricity from Tasmania or to export electricity from Victoria? 202.92.43.51 (talk) 07:53, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why was it built? 

message: According to http://www.basslink.com.au/home/index.php?id=39 the coordinates of the static inverter in Tasmania may be incorrect. However correcting them is impossible with Online-Maps as these are too old.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.46.250.82 (talk) 17:29, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The co-ords in the article are 41°6′53″S 146°53′31″E, and Google maps confirms them: 41°06'51"S 146°53'31"E. (They may have been corrected in the last 10½ years.)
Prisoner of Zenda (talk) 05:20, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect coordinates for facilities on Tasmania 
Talk:Alexander Harris (writer)

message: I have removed the word fictional from the description of this authors writing as it implies he was a novelist dealing solely in imaginative fiction.  It is clear from reading his best known book "Settlers and Convicts" (1847) that the work is heavily autobiographical with elements of fiction added. the books value as an historical source is discussed by Manning Clark in his forward to the 1964 MUP edition (reprinted in 1969 and 1977) in which he begins by saying, "This work is one of the best descriptions of the way of life and the values of those men who helped to build the colony of New South Wales by the labour of their hands." (Bardo Nerang (talk) 01:42, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fiction?
Talk:Bergelmir (moon)

message: This is a compound name, so in Norse both the Ber and the gel are stressed. The g has a /j/ (y) sound. kwami 07:57, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciation
Talk:The Fortnightly Review

message: Hit intro while writing edit summary.--Technopat (talk) 22:39, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sorry! 

message: Removed the claim the 'Fortnightly Review' had been incorporated into the Contemporary Review, since it had no citation, and the Contemporary Review article states its future is 'uncertain as of 2013"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2804:431:C7CA:DD21:5493:8A7C:FB50:69E8 (talk) 14:14, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  No citation 

message: There is a different, and much less well-known, Fortnightly Review: a US Catholic journal published in St. Louis, MO. It ran for at least 40 years; a sample can be found here (among other years and issues) at Archive Org:  Vol. XL (1933)
Bill (talk) 13:22, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A different Fortnightly Review
Talk:The North Face (novel)

message: Isn't the title of this book just North Face? Robina Fox (talk) 20:35, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: Thank you very much for providing an illustration for this article. Das Baz, aka Erudil 17:51, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Illustration
Talk:Hati (moon)

message: Is it possible that the name originated from the ancient Haiti civilization?--24.171.1.195 (talk) 02:51, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No, this moon was named from a figure in Norse mythology, a giant wolf who tries to catch and eat the moon. There's a link in the article if you want to know more. --Patteroast (talk) 06:17, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  naming
Talk:Mary Robinson (Maid of Buttermere)

message: I recognise that this page needs more polish and sources (Oxford Dictionary of National Biog is source for dates and outline).  Felt the need to create the page after seeing a chat transcript from some students getting her confused with the poet Mary Robinson whom they were studying!  PamD 10:08, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Three-volume novel

message: Does anyone have anything on the two volume novel in the 20th-century? I have two novels, by John Cowper Powys, so published in the USA.Rwood128 (talk) 13:04, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two volume novels  

message: One-and-a-half guineas is £1 11s 6d, not £1 10s. 6d. Which is the correct price?
--Gambaguru (talk) 08:26, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  History -- pricing? 

message: The 21 volume novel. 2A00:23C6:F680:2C01:19CE:7B1E:95:D452 (talk) 17:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Patrick O Brian
Talk:Time After Time (Alexander novel)

message: Mary Steenburgen's name was misspelled as "Steenbergen". I have corrected it and referred to it as a minor edit, since her name is easily verified. Durwoodie (talk) 10:16, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Errors in Title Block

message: Have added a plot summary, a list of major differences between the novel and the movie, and two external links. Durwoodie (talk) 10:43, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Added New Sections

message: References to show it takes place in the CBTB?Mercurywoodrose (talk) 06:54, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: San Fran
Talk:Tokyo (novel)

message: Is this book available as an ebook at all? thanks 79.78.56.42 (talk) 18:05, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  eBook
Talk:Classic Produktion Osnabrück

message: The label was founded by Gerhard Ortmann. Contrary to what WAS on this page, Burkhard Schmilgun (now A&R manager) was not one of the founders of CPO - he first became involved when he wrote the texts for CPO's Korngold Edition. (Ilja Nieuwland), 23 May 2007).
:Thank you for the correction Schissel | Sound the Note! 20:43, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Trimalchio (novel)

message: Should this not simply redirect to "The Great Gatsby", or more specifically to a section that would deal with what is presented here? This article can only have enough information to warrant a section of the 'Gatsby' page, not a whole page to itself. 142.22.226.5 (talk) 19:36, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, this is an example of a pedantic splitting up into parts of that which should be presented as a coherent whole: the topic makes no sense considered independent of The Great Gatsby. Cynwolfe (talk) 04:42, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

text: I concur. This article has little room for expansion and amounts to little more than a blurb. Jason Quinn (talk) 18:10, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge to "The Great Gatsby" discussion
Talk:Ttyl (novel)

message: In Round Rock, Texas, parents are circulating a petition to get the book isolated in or banned from middle school libraries because of explicit sexual references and discussion of crotchless panties and lap dances.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.179.61.169 (talk) 03:16, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy 

message: I propose to merge Ttyl (novel) into Ttyl. I believe a disambiguation page is not necessary at Ttyl, as the only thing it disambiguates is this article, and the definition of TTYL (talk to you later), which doesn't have it's own article. If nothing else, the definition of TTYL could be mentioned in this article or in a hatnote. Mattx8y (talk) 13:40, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:What the Duck

message: This site has been mentioned on this strip.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Willirennen (talk • contribs) 00:57, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia mention 
Category talk:Real estate agents

message: I have recategorized the articles that appeared in this category, overwhelmingly into either Category:Real estate industry trade groups or Category:Real estate companies.  Only two entries related to individuals: neither of which appear to be brokers -- a class of licensing/registration quite different from salespersons.  -- Robocoder (t|c) 10:43, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:Epistolary novels

message: I can't figure out how to add a book to the list, but The Beatrice Letters by Lemony Snicket seems to fall into this catagory. Sik2thestomach 00:27, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You add the category at the end of the article - which I have done - so take a look and see the sybntax. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 09:47, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Engleby

message: Most of this article seems to be copy-pasted from a guardian book review unfortunately 80.248.183.225 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment was added at 12:23, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Plagiarism

message: This article's subject is fine, but it reads like a book review.--NeoNerd 10:54, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Tone

message: Either you read a different book or didn't finish it 
Spoilers follow
The character doesn't join the startup newspaper or become a historical novelist.--
His murder of a woman at university catches up with him and he is committed to a secure hospital. The last third of the book deals with his arrest, trial and incarceration.
Spoilers end
222.154.97.16 07:49, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Accuracy

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2007/may/12/fiction.sebastianfaulks http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2005/aug/21/fiction.sebastianfaulks. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Yoenit (talk) 22:00, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Please revdel all the back to page creation as copyvio was foundiational. Yoenit (talk) 22:00, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Camilo Henríquez

message: First of all, I think this is a great article.  The subject is fascinating and I enjoyed learning a bit about him.  I gave the article a draft copyedit and tried to break apart some of the various pieces of information in the hopes that someone with a more intimate knowledge of the fellow will be able to format the article so the information about his time as a priest, revolutionary, senator, political essayist, and newspaperman will be grouped as individual sections, rather than structuring the article in a purely linear form, which can get a bit confusing.  I'm looking forward to seeing the article's progression and would love to help out wherever I can!  Cheers and great work so far! gaillimhConas tá tú? 11:11, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment
MediaWiki talk:Upload

message: (Note: I've just deleted the associated system message, as it was identical to the default. It was previously changed to say 'Upload file (without wizard)' by User:Uncle G (Changed label because of new upload wizard, modelled upon the Commons one. See discussion at MediaWiki talk:Uploadtext.) and reverted by User:Rdsmith4 (this makes no sense in the absence of an alternative reading "Upload file (with wizard)". I can't find the wizard; this label is confusing.)
Having two links saying 'Upload file', which is the status quo, is a confusing thing to do in this situation. However, I agree with User:Rdsmith4's concerns that the (with wizard) notation is also confusing. (For the benefit of people who don't already know: this is the link in the toolbox, which makes it possible to upload a file without using the wizard.) The options:
* Leave it with two links saying the same thing
* Change this system message (and/or MediaWiki:Sidebar) to something less confusing
* Remove the link created by this message entirely
I don't really like the first option; that's just confusing to new users. The third option runs the risk of annoying established uploaders who already know how to upload. So the second option would be best from my point of view. Does anyone have any ideas about how to rename the links so that new users will be attracted to the first one, but the link in the toolbox exists for established users? --ais523 11:15, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What should this link say?
Talk:Action description language

message: Some more content for the ADL syntax. I intend to add the semantics in the next days, and expand the example. Kikoso (talk) 13:33, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Worked on

message: This page is a nice example of combining wrong with correct information. I'm really schocked, what kind of information you get on STRIPS and ADL on the Internet. For example nobody ever notes, that STRIPS is in its original state not as constrained as it gets presented. The original STRIPS from 1972 allowed all kinds of formulas from the first order logic.
But to the topic: First of all is the example totally wrong. This is an example, that is taken from the book "Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach". It is stated as a PDDL example and I really don't know, how anybody would mistake that as an ADL example. I mean, it is written in the article itself: "An ADL schema consists of an action name, an optional parameter list and four optional groups of clauses labeled Precond, Add, Delete and Update.". If the ADL action consists of the gropus of clauses named as "Precond", "Add", "Delete" and "Update", then why do we have "Precondition" and "Effect" in the example? Someone really could have noticed. Proper examples can be found in Pednaults Paper to ADL.
ADL by the way does not have any types. I do not know, from where that was taken. I don't think, that there are conditional effects either. This article needs some thorough clean-up. --Youkichirou (talk) 10:39, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong information and wrong example 
Talk:Ti-tree

message: It just seems stupid to me to have plant's called ti-tree that are NOT also called tea-tree, covered by the one blanket tea tree article, which if you'll have a look is actually substantially incorrect also, and hardly presents any information at all. I mean, "applied to a number of different, unrelated plants" is completely incorrect, there are perhaps hundreds and hundreds of related species, and only three or four odd species that are not related.
I am sorry that Ti-tree is not in some way authoritative, but it is at least AS VALID, in the absence of any definitive, authoritative source to say otherwise, and in the presence of many authoritative sources which use the spelling.
I believe you have taken offense at my response which I gave when I felt similarly offended, and are acting out of indignation, rather than acting in the interests of developing good content. I am sorry for my language, but it was meant to be a somewhat humourous retort to having my work, as it were, swept from under my feet. Did you not read my reply above? What is the urgent issue that you have with Ti-tree existing as an article for a while? Personally, I could care less what you do in the future but while I am here and working on an article that is NOT IN THE WAY OF ANYONE then I would appreciate you to just step off and let me do my own thing with it.
If you can criticise more about the article than my initial belief -- based on a good source which I cannot recall, but I do not form such beliefs based on random naysayers -- that Ti-tree is somehow more "correct" than tea-tree, then I will be impressed.
Again, I will say, if you choose to redirect this page, then PLEASE MERGE THE CONTENT since nobody else is ever going to check under the REDIRECT at the odd spelling of "Ti-tree", unless you make "Ti-tree" the default. ie, if you REDIRECT this and do not completely merge my content elsewhere, then YOU are essentially deleting that content, since I personally am never likely to come back to edit it again, and no-one else would find it.
That is why I was so alarmingly rude in my comment, because PEOPLE LIKE YOU NEED TO KNOW THAT YOU HAVE A DELETERIOUS EFFECT WHEN YOU EFFECTIVELY DELETE GOOD CONTENT FROM WIKIPEDIA, let alone my own personal venting of frustration for having my effort to work here needlessly interrupted by robotic droids who do nothing but implement three-word GOTO statements like a frigging VIC20. 'k? -- Soonstart 13:42, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Based on this, which aside from your expressing your frustration, agrees that ti-tree is an alternate spelling with no strong sources indicating that the disambiguation page should be moved here, I'll go ahead and restore the redirect.  If there is any content here about these plants that is lacking from the plant-specific articles (I didn't see any, but I could be wrong), please feel free to get it from the history and add it as appropriate to those articles.  Thanks. -FisherQueen (Talk) 17:23, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Well please consider stopping REDIRECTING AGAIN
Talk:Rahim Yar Khan

message: A big portion of the text in this article seems to be copied from world66.com. That site is cc-by-sa, however as far as I can see there is absolute no attribution to that source. However the text needs to be copyedited a lot anyway IMHO. andy 11:30, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

message: There's considerable nonsense and/or poor English on this page. I've cleaned up some of it to more comprehensible English, but it needs expert attention for refs and further clean-ups. Ianjm (talk) 22:23, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expert Tag

message: Pre-move version of this page in /archive/. Rich Farmbrough, 16:14, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Version 

message: Why is the Punjabi language not language section 124.29.239.116 (talk) 08:03, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Punjabi language 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Rahim Yar Khan/archive and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 1#Rahim Yar Khan/archive until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.   -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 06:15, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Pursuant to the above discussion, old revisions of this page previously included in the history of Rahim Yar Khan/archive are now at Rahim Yar Khan (city). signed, Rosguill talk 22:01, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Rahim Yar Khan/archive" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Monad (music)

message: This dispute concerns User:TheScotch's apparently preferred version of this article. I have re-reverted his reversion in the meantime.
TheScotch, the existing comments on this talk page note that your version is unreadable. While articles should not stay away from appropriate technical detail on their subjects, some editors, myself included, may see your writing as deliberate advocacy of pompousness and esotericism. I would also like to add that I do not see how the long second paragraph adds anything relevant at all to the topic. More specifically:
* What do the various chords, laid out in a meticulously repetitive proselist, have to do with a monad?
* Your revision mentions the power set. What does set theory have to do with pitches and scales?
* "Seemingly trivial" and "essential" should not belong in a neutral, factual article if these viewpoints cannot be justified.
Suggested resolutions:
* Answer the above questions to determine how your added content is relevant, and how it should be properly integrated into the article text.
* Add appropriate sources and citations to any outstanding claims you've added; they are non-trivial enough to warrant this.
* Behave figuratively as human male genitalia until one of us is expressly castrated and the other wins the sacred right to apply his preferred changes. (Optional)
~ Jafet Speaker of many words 13:02, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  TheScotch dispute
Talk:Brown Lake (Stradbroke Island)

message: Stradbroke Island has a long and rich indigenous history which I am well aware of, I have removed several statements shown below from the article 
It was because of this colouring that the Aborigines believed that it had medicinal benefits.[citation needed] It was known by the Aborigines as Women's lake.[citation needed]
 Although probably correct a definitive written source is lacking, I have included the material here in the hope that someone may track down a suitable reference and they can be re-included.--Matt (talk) 23:24, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aboriginal significance 

message: Should this article be named Brown Lake (North Stradbroke Island) to reflect the name of the island on which it is located. - Shiftchange (talk) 07:04, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move 

message: Hi Wikipedians, 
I made some additions to Brown Lake's wikipedia page. I extended the lead section and I also added the sections of; Aquatic fauna, Geography, Flora and Natural History. SnoMurWal (talk) 03:45, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes Made  

message: The article has a lede that pulls some information from within the article. It's very close to "B" class as per the evaluation criteria found here. Additional citations are needed. Some cleanup required. The major point it needs help with is #6 on the B-class assessment criteria,  Some of the technical terms are not explained, within the article, sufficiently for the casual reader to know what they mean. Articles on Wikipedia must be written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. I believe every other point in the criteria is met sufficiently, though there is room for improvement. The class status has been changed to "C" (Project Lakes only). --ARoseWolf 13:08, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reviewed
Talk:Bergell

message: I have just changed the redirect to Val Bregaglia, rather than Bregaglia Range. My reason for doing this was that the German Wikipedia article :de:Bergell is about the valley rather than the range of mountains to its south, and that there are a number of redlinks on the German Wikipedia to :de:Bergeller_Alpen (redlinks to the page), which would be the equivalent to our  Bregaglia Range article. —Ian Spackman 11:40, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Where should we redirect?
Talk:List of Cambodian films

message: A duplicate of this article has been created at List of khmer film, and should preferably be merged here. PC78 (talk) 17:46, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: List of Khmer film has far more information and is properly formatted - I'd suggested merging the additional films here (this list is longer) into Khmer films and then adding some references :) Paxse (talk) 16:59, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 
Talk:Vidal Benveniste

message: I used Google translate http://translate.google.com/#es|iw|Vidal%20Benveniste to get a translation of "Vidal Benveniste" to "וידאל בנבנישתי". I then searched in Google, & came up with a link to http://www.hebrewbooks.org I then searched for "וידאל בנבנישתי" again and found a page in  תולדות ישראל-חלק שנים עשר - יעבץ, זאב http://www.hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?sits=1&req=36987&st=%u05D5%u05D9%u05D3%u05D0%u05DC%20%u05D1%u05E0%u05D1%u05E0%u05D9%u05E9%u05EA%u05D9. I cut & pasted this text into Google translate, and it seems to mention Vidal Benveniste, but it needs someone who reads Hebrew to make sense of it. Peaceray (talk) 21:18, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hebrew source for info on Vidal Benveniste?
Talk:Uvs Province

message: This needs to be rephrased. The use of overwhelmingly implies that they observer was expecting something else, and thus this language seems biased. Predominantly perhaps?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:18E8:2:28D0:F000:0:0:13AD (talk) 23:42, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Overwhelmingly Athiest?