lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Zarraga

message: What is the contemporary arts in zarraga 120.28.234.71 (talk) 15:32, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contemporary artss 

message: What is the contemporary arts in zarraga iloilo 120.28.234.71 (talk) 15:34, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contemporary artss
Talk:Burnt River (Oregon)

message: *http://www.usbr.gov/projects//ImageServer?imgName=Doc_1303155618962.pdf
--Jsayre64 (talk) 15:00, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source for expansion 
Talk:Chwalfa

message: I took the following section out of the article. It has a number of flaws, but might the basis for a properly [{WP:V|sourced]] addition:
Chwalfa is the name of a drama filmed by the BBC during the early 60s.Most of the extras in it where people who lived in the Carneddi area of Bethesda where there was a slate quarry up until the 1970s;this quarry was not owned by the Pennant family, who owned the nearby Penrhyn quarry, but by a company that employed many men who were out on strike during the great penrhyn strike of 1900.
Railfan23 (talk) 01:46, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed from the article, but worth discussing
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Red Link Recovery/Participants

message: Red names on this list. I fell like fixing it, but I wouldn't want to get into trouble Vilaskes 08:22, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Red names

message: I can't help but chuckle at the fact that several members of WikiProject Red Link Recovery have red links in their signatures.  Maybe it's just me, but I find that quite humorous :) --Andrew (User:90) (talk) 21:53, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Must ... resist temptation ... to ... delete Andrew's page ... - TB (talk) 22:27, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Red Link members
Template talk:28 Days Later

message: Is this template really needed? It's not like all this material can't be linked through the first film's article, and it's not like a two-movie series really generates that complicated a list of material. Doczilla 08:34, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If nobody has any thoughts on that, maybe we should nominate this for TfD and get outside input. Doczilla (talk) 12:03, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I can see your point, but still, there are templates covering much smaller areas of interest or much more limited material that still get allowed to survive; this one does not stand out as particularly useless. --Jayunderscorezero (talk) 15:58, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, but to me that seems like an OTHERSTUFFEXISTS argument. Doczilla (talk) 21:03, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Why the template?
Talk:Marta (given name)

message: Sorry, didn't finish note on my edit: I removed the text "Hebrew meaning: "Goat". Roman meaning: Big front teeth." from the definition section of the infobox, replacing it with the previous text but preserving the added Armenian meaning. Since "goat" and "big front teeth" don't appear as in any Hebrew or Latin sources I can find and are not mentioned in the article, I'm assuming those represent vandalism. Jackal59 (talk) 12:52, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Yu Yu Hakusho season 2

message: I've nominated this article for featured list status. Improvements on the article are welcome and comments in the nomination above would be greatly appreciated. Regards, Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 07:21, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: FLC

message: It seems that this article is using colours in the infobox which don't satisfy Wikipedia's accessibility guidelines. The contrast between the foreground colour and the background colour is low, which means that it may be difficult or impossible for people with visual impairments to read it.
To correct this problem, a group of editors have decided to remove support for invalid colours from Template:Infobox television season and other television season templates after 1 September 2015. If you would still like to use custom colours for the infobox and episode list in this article after that date, please ensure that the colours meet the WCAG AAA standard.
To test whether a colour combination is AAA-compliant you can use Snook's colour contrast tool. If your background colour is dark, then please test it against a foreground colour of "FFFFFF" (white). If it is light, please test it against a foreground colour of "000000" (black). The tool needs to say "YES" in the box for "WCAG 2 AAA Compliant" when you input the foreground and the background colour. You can generally make your colour compliant by adjusting the "Value (%)" fader in the middle box.
Please be sure to change the invalid colour in every place that it appears, including the infobox, the episode list, and the series overview table. If you have any questions about this, please ask on Template talk:Infobox television season. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:31, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colour contrast problems 
Talk:Yu Yu Hakusho season 3

message: I've nominated this article for featured list status. Feel free to improve it in any fashion or comment in the nomination above. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 08:43, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: FLC
Talk:Yu Yu Hakusho season 4

message: This article needs pictures, Kyle MacKenzie Street...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.22.111.99 (talk) 23:39, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It seems that this article is using colours in the infobox which don't satisfy Wikipedia's accessibility guidelines. The contrast between the foreground colour and the background colour is low, which means that it may be difficult or impossible for people with visual impairments to read it.
To correct this problem, a group of editors have decided to remove support for invalid colours from Template:Infobox television season and other television season templates after 1 September 2015. If you would still like to use custom colours for the infobox and episode list in this article after that date, please ensure that the colours meet the WCAG AAA standard.
To test whether a colour combination is AAA-compliant you can use Snook's colour contrast tool. If your background colour is dark, then please test it against a foreground colour of "FFFFFF" (white). If it is light, please test it against a foreground colour of "000000" (black). The tool needs to say "YES" in the box for "WCAG 2 AAA Compliant" when you input the foreground and the background colour. You can generally make your colour compliant by adjusting the "Value (%)" fader in the middle box.
Please be sure to change the invalid colour in every place that it appears, including the infobox, the episode list, and the series overview table. If you have any questions about this, please ask on Template talk:Infobox television season. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:31, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colour contrast problems 
Talk:James Harmon Brown and Barbara Esensten

message: WHY THE FUCK ARE THESE TWO THE SAME? THEY ARE INDIVIDUAL WRITERS WITH DIFFERING CREDITS. SEPERATE IS THE WAY TO GO. NOW. DO IT. NOW.
:Calm down. Take this up with Glo145, the editor's whose talk page you just added a bunch of suggestions for articles you want created to, except do it in a way without profanity and yelling. Flyer22 09:11, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Oblique Strategies

message: An "X in popular culture" section is not a trivia section.  The trivia tag should be removed. 219.88.55.27 (talk) 07:58, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Any disorganized and unselective list of miscellaneous facts is a trivia section, regardless of the name in the section title.  Renaming a section from "Trivia" to "Pop culture references" does not make the content of that section stop being trivia. -- HiEv 10:33, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia 

message: Questionable Content mentioned this, but there's no reference on the page. Was it here then deleted, or has it just never come up?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.161.92.230 (talk) 03:37, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: A single webcomic references is just too trivial for words. --CAVincent (talk) 09:11, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  QC 

message: The See Also section is confusing:
* Aleatoric music
* Fluxus § Event score
* I Ching
* Lateral thinking
* Water Yam (artist's book)
* More Dark Than Shark
I get "Lateral thinking", but what do the rest of these have to do with "Oblique Strategies". Shouldn't the relation be clear or explained before adding a link? Most (none?) of these pages reference Oblique Strategies. Or is the use of nonsensical links itself an oblique strategy? :-)
159.18.221.196 (talk) 16:40, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  See Also
Talk:Mr. Gum

message: This book is about an evil man known as Mr. Gum, a girl called Jammy Grammy Lammy F'Huppa F'Huppa Berlin Stereo Eo Eo Lebb C'Yepp Nermonica Le Straypeck De Grespin De Crespin De Sespin De Vespin De Whoop De Loop De Brunkle Merry Christmas Lenoir, but her friends call her Polly, an old man called Friday O'Leary, an evil butcher called Billy William The Third, a sweetshop owner called Mrs. Lovely, a fat man called Jonathan Ripples, a launderette owner called Martin Launderette, a little girl called Peter and her dad called Nancy, Beany McLeany, who likes things that ryme, an woman called Old Granny, David Casserole the town mayor, and a big massive whopper of a dog called Jakey. The plot is Mr. Gum being lazy, but he's threatened to keep his garden the prettiest, greeniest, floweriest, gardeniest garden in all of Lamonic Bibber by a fairy in his bath-tub. Then Jakey moves into town and mucks it up, and Mr. Gum plans to poison him. Polly here's this plan and tries to stop Mr. Gum. She meets and teams up with Friday O'Leary. Polly and Friday get to Mr. Gum's house and find Jakey is choking on some rotten cow hearts. Polly gives Jakey some magic chocolate shaped like a dolphin. As soon as it touches his tounge, it turns real. He then feels better than ever. The Spirit Of The Rainbow appears and Mr. Gum is so cowardly that he jumps over the fence and runs away. The town celebrate there heroes. Friday asks Mrs. Lovely to marry him and she says yes. The book is written by Andy Stanton and illustrated by David Tazzyman.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.198.196.91 (talk) 11:03, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  You're a bad man Mr. Gum! 
Talk:Birdie Reeve Kay

message: Do we have a source for her birthday, 16 January 1907? AxelBoldt 06:25, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I used the Social Security Death Index (http://ssdi.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/ssdi.cgi). MisfitToys 03:45, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, I didn't know about that! AxelBoldt 16:18, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Birthday
Talk:Frank Rio

message: There does not seem to be a town in italy named "Lovato". Being from Italy myself, I've been looking for it in several archives including the italian wikipedia. There is no reference to a town with that name. Care to look into this?
95.246.138.41 (talk) 10:39, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lovato? 

message: Cited sources say that Rio was definitively involved in this crime. Contributors disagree, arguing the evidence is cirumstantial. This is mere opinion on the part of contributors; if sources can be cited to make this case, then those sources should be cited. If not, then that opinion on the part of contributors should be removed and the cited sources allowed to stand. - Tim1965 (talk) 22:27, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  St. Valentine's Day Massacre - NPOV 

message: I would disagree.  For the last 18 years I have read everything I can get my hands on about that incident, including virtually all of the scholarly, well-researched books that deal with it either specifically or in context of the rest of the book, and to the discerning reader, what is patently clear is that there are very few absolute and VERIFIABLE facts connected with the massacre - though there are many well though-out and convincing conclusions.  No matter how well-thought out and convincing, however, none of them that I have seen are provable as facts. The web sites devoted to the Massacre are beyond a joke - from one to another, you would think you are reading about two different incidents.  I am speaking solely of published and respected research (books such as "Mr. Capone" and all the others). Even those researchers do not uniformly agree on the number of shooters - most say four, a few say five.   Bottom line - like so many things about the Massacre - the true answer simply is not known for a fact.  Excellent, convincing circumstantial cases are made for almost a dozen individuals, including, but certainly not limited to, Fred Burke, Fred Goetz, Joseph Lolordo, Albert Anselmi, John Scalise, Jack McGurn and Frank Rio.  I have yet to read any well-done research that suggests more than five shooters, and most seem convinced of only four, as I said (and admittedly, that is not known for a fact either). 
I would love to know who the shooters were, beyond the shadow of a doubt.  But I know of no research that can state - and back up with VERIFIABLE fact - who any of the shooters were for certain. one year to the 80th anniverary of the attatck. 
As regards the Massacre, I think the article - as most - is fine as written.  It is certainly more "Wiki".  Facts are facts.  But "convincing conclusions" are not verifiable facts. 
I would love to see proof - truly verifiable proof - that Frank Rio was indeed, one of the shooters.  I have not seen it yet.  Considering it is now nearly the 80th anniversary of the event, I think it is unlikely any of us ever will
Melos Antropon (talk) 04:01, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  St. Valentine's Day Massacre - NPOV
Talk:Juliana Geran Pilon

message: Very little of this article had inline citations and most of the external links were dead and unreachable via archive. I've rewritten much of the article with sourced material. More third party sources are really essential, but at least what we have at this point is WP:BLP compliant. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 21:57, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Sourced content

message: In addition to Mrs. Pilon's two accounts  and ,  has only made edits to this article and is also probably her. Apocheir (talk) 01:05, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI users
Talk:Off-Off Campus

message: In the AfD, here are articles I noted for potential inclusion, in case anyone has pay access and could work them in:
*Improv Theater Celebrates 50th Anniversary, Associated Press (July 5, 2005)(pay article; the 50th anniversary of improv in chicago is based on the continuum of the compass players through Off Off Campus -- its not a fifty year period unless you count Off Campus from 1986-2005; also it was Off Off Campus that performed at this 50 year show)
*Seeds of improv sown at U. of C. // University to celebrate 50th anniversary of debut show, Chicago Sun Times (July 4, 2005) (pay article; same comment)
*Everything points to a lot of fun for Compass event, Chicago Sun Times (July 1, 2005) (pay article; same comment)
*Compass Co-Founder Returns to Chicago to Recreate the Birth of Improv Comedy 50 Years Ago, Business Wire (June 27, 2005) (pay article; same comment)
*CAN MATH ON THE MIDWAY BE EXCITING THEATER? HERE'S `PROOF' Chicago Tribune (Dec. 13, 2000) (pay article, about David Auburn, we can tell Off Off is mentioned, don't know how much)
*LIVING `PROOF' U. OF C. GRAD IS NOW HOTTEST PLAYWRIGHT ON BROADWAY AND PRIME CONTENDER FOR A PULITZER Chicago Tribune (Apr. 16, 2001) (Pay article, same as last one)
*ECONOMICS PROF CRUNCHES NUMBERS TO COMEDIC EFFECT, Chicago Tribute (Nov. 13, 1998) (pay article, Auburn again)
*The Right Equation ; A lifelong interest in theater and a casual interest in math add up to a playwright's dream for 'Proof' author David Auburn, Baltimore Sun (Feb. 25, 2002) (pay article; appears to be covered in another Auburn-based article)
*The 'Proof' of Playwright's Talents Is in His New Work's Prizes; Theater * David Auburn's second full-length play has won some of drama's highest distinctions, Los Angeles Times (June 4, 2001) (pay article; auburn again)
*Gridiron Show tops list of local follies, Chigago Sun-Times (May 18, 1990) (pay article, extent of coverage unknown)
* Edinburgh or Bust, Troupes Vow, Chicago Sun-Times (July 28, 1995) (pay article, extent of coverage unknown, but appears to cover one of group's trips to Ediburgh)
*Edinburgh bloodbath Fest hopefuls find competition withering, go home penniless, Chicago Tribute (Sept. 27, 1989) (pay article, same topic as last, for different trip) 
--Milowent (talk) 19:30, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Richard Seed

message: i love it  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.146.251.30 (talk) 00:27, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There are few people who sprung on the scene as quickly to then vanish away. Seed is about 92. I searched for evidence that he has died. I have found none.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:00, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is Seed still alive
Talk:Poot (The Wire)

message: I added the fact that Poot was the sole survivor of the sixteen frontline gang members who feature in Series One. The other fifteen, for clarity, are (in order of death, so major spoiler warning): John Bailey (Omar's crew), Brandon (Omar's crew), Stinkum, Orlando, Wallace, Little Man; D'Angelo; Stringer; Bodie; Proposition Joe, Savino, Omar; and (the three in prison) Wee-bey, Bird and Avon. I personally don't consider anybody else important enough to join the list.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fuzzibloke (talk • contribs) 15:30, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow, that's a lot of death and prison. Good work. --CutOffTies (talk) 15:34, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: sixteen characters

message: I have opened a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Fictional characters#Redirecting articles on %5Bmostly%5D minor The Wire characters about either redirecting this article to List of The Wire characters or turning it into a stub. If anyone is following this article I hope you can weigh in there. 61.18.156.43 (talk) 03:45, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to redirect this article to [[List of The Wire characters]]
Talk:Zach Blair

message: The picture isn't representing Zach Blair, it's Rise against's lead singer tim.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.48.77.216 (talk) 03:29, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  wrong picture 

message: Updated image from 2006 to current one.Photocyclone (talk) 20:37, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: I mean, just read it. 2001:8F8:1C61:226C:1C51:46DA:4036:583E (talk) 13:59, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Looks like someone's got a crush...
Talk:Jack Caddigan

message: User 86.3.134.164 altered this page on 2 April 2014, adding the following to the publication entry for "Rose of No Man's Land": "n.b. This song was recorded by the William Thomas Orchestra before the Americans entered the war, in 1916. see http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/features/desert-island-discs/castaway/ef9e5dff#b03ymr52  The Brennan/Caddigan 'International' copyright was claimed in 1918."
I have removed this for the present, though I'm keeping the user's contribution here, on the talk page, pending further research. Regal Records did indeed release a recording of this title by "William Thomas / with Orchestra" on Regal G 7547 (mx 69948); on the flip side was "City of Laughter—City of Tears" (mx 69949). The BBC website and some other sources give a release date of 1916, but I cannot confirm this in any primary source. Possibly the 1916 date first appeared on the album "Oh It's a Lovely War, vol. 2" (2002). Regal Records was the British label for Columbia releases, and a Columbia recording of this title was made by Hugh Donovan on 23 October 1918 (see Tim Brooks, The Columbia Master Book Discography, p. 264). I have not yet heard that recording. Several other recordings of this title were issued that year and in 1919 by other firms. "City of Laughter—City of Tears" was copyrighted in 1920 in the US. On the basis of the copyright record and discographic history, it would seem extremely unlikely that the recording by "William Thomas" actually dates from 1916. 
Wfbrooks (talk) 22:35, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: The William Thomas recording of "Rose of No Man's Land"
Talk:Ceramium

message: Concerning article :-"Ceramium I have has trouble before when repeating a reference. Will be grateful for help, not just putting things right but letting me know what I did wrong! When repeating what is wrong (for example) with: Osborne 10:12, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You're using double-single-quotes () rather than the correct double-quotes ("). These may look the same in many fonts, but they are different to computers, and only the double-quotes will allow the reference to work. (I think you can use single single quotes in this context as well, but using single double quotes is safest.) --ais523 11:18, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: The carpogonium is certainly diploid  and releases diploid spore which settle, grow to produce diploid plants. These diploid plants release haploid tetraspores. Although I know this to be almost certainly true I have not found it stated in the references! I'm working on it.Osborne (talk) 20:09, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Repoduction

message: Episperma is a synonym, but I can't source it.  Could someone try to?  For now, I'll leave the redirect, but it needs explained in the text, or deleted.  --69.226.103.13 (talk) 06:17, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episperma 
Talk:Dex

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot 10:12, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-11-6 Automated pywikipediabot message 

message: The QWEST directory and the Romanian dictionary are not "literature".
I have removed "Organizations: DECA (organization)". DECA isn't DEX. I have checked, on the DECA page there is no single mention of DEX, as an abbr. or otherwise. Arminden (talk) 08:49, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Structure. DECA doesn't belong.
Talk:Robson Rotation

message: This kind of ballot rotation was introduced in St. Joseph County, IN.  The method of ballot printing machine voting was developed and introduced by Aloysius J. Kromkowski, the head of the election commission, and one of the most popular elected officials ((St. Joe County Clerk until term limited and St. Joe County Treasurer until term limited.) 68.48.204.94 (talk) 20:30, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  This method of ballot rotation was used in the 1970s in St. Joseph County, IN
Talk:Modern naval tactics

message: There is a clear need for a non-US centric article about naval tactics (as the US is not the only country with a navy), and a separate article about U.S. Carrier Group Tactics which an intensive subject in itself. Chwyatt 10:44, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[U.S. Carrier Group Tactics]] and [[Modern Naval tactics]]
Talk:Egonomics

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot 10:45, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-11-6 Automated pywikipediabot message 

message: I added Schelling's germinal papers and also have extensive notes, email me if interested. -Reagle (talk) 18:54, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Ludlow, Massachusetts

message: I'm removing the following text:
:"Let us not forget the Ludlow Hockey programs supported by the deceased Charles J. "Buddy" Plankey who sponsored a Ludlow Hockey Paper Trailer in the town for many years. May the influence of Plankey Heating Service not be forgotten."
While this may hint at something notable, it's not quite there and there are no references to support it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pjorg (talk • contribs) 00:02, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hockey 

message: where did the section on eduction disappear to?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 136.167.244.255 (talk) 02:49, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Education section

message: There are three elementary schools in Ludlow not two. 2601:199:67F:1DD0:FC0A:176:D12A:A527 (talk) 19:24, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of schools