lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of Albanian monarchs

message: I don't understand how we have the Assen, Victorio Emmanuele, the Balsic and the article is still called List of Albanian monarchs. The article should be called List of Monarchs who ruled Albania, probably. sulmues (talk)  21:07, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Albanian monarchs? Are we sure they were all Albanians? 

message: If the scope of the article "list of Albanian monarchs" is about "Albanian monarchs" then we can erase much of the article as very few of these figures ever called themselves "monarchs" and some weren't even Albanians. If the scope is "list of Albanian rulers" which corresponds to the content of the article, then the title should be changed.  we had similar discussion a while ago.--Maleschreiber (talk) 02:27, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: One is still an "Albanian monarch" if they are an ethnic Bulgarian, Frenchman or Martian as long as they are a monarch of an "Albania/Arbanon/Arvan/etc". Best that way. Otherwise we run into tricky questions about ethnicity in medieval times.--Calthinus (talk) 18:59, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: On second thought, this page should be moved. Albanian monarchs is not a large enough list to warrant notability. However, if there is a term that encompasses kings, "princes" (in the "principality" sense i.e. like Russian "princes") and dukes, then that is probably the right thing to do. --Calthinus (talk) 19:02, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scope
Talk:List of Algerians

message: Hello, 
This article contains names of notable natives of Algeria but also names of Algerian descendants born in France or anywhere else, as well as people of French origins born in Algeria, such as Yves Saint Laurent. I myself have contributed to add names falling into these various categories, in order to enrich the article, but I wonder whether the last two categories should be included here or be part of another list, or if another organization of the article should be favored. 
Thank you for your comments. Wikilyks (talk) 11:14, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Wikilyks The list should not even exist. We cannot create a list of Algerians, and it should be deleted. Riad Salih (talk) 16:33, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Why? I note that this type of list exists for almost every country on Wikipedia.  Wikilyks (talk) 10:04, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion on the scope of the list
Talk:List of All England men's singles champions

message: According to Smash and the english version of dillesport.dk  the runner-up was Liem Swie King, and according to the danish version of dillesport.dk the runner-up was Luan Jin . Any other website about it, so we can prove who was the runner-up? MontanNito (talk) 13:38, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably it is in my journals from 1982 - but it takes a little time of searching for it... --Florentyna (talk) 22:11, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Luan Jin is right, according to Badminton-Sport, 5/1982, page 5. Frost won 	11-15, 15-2, 15-7. --Florentyna (talk) 09:38, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 1982 All England
Talk:List of Allied ships at the Japanese surrender

message: needs more citations :) 
Cam 01:44, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessments
Talk:List of Allied traitors during World War II

message: Needs to be expanded to include people traitors from the other allied nations.  Since many of them were occupied, consideration will have to be made on how to handle collaborators.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.98.181.183 (talk) 14:10, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Norman Baillie-Stewart was convicted of "committing an act likely to assist the enemy" while the article's heading says that it covers those 'suspected of treachery or treason during World War II.'  I suggest that either: -
1.  Baillie-Stewart should be removed from the article, or
2.  Its scope should be widened to include the crime of which he was convicted. Alekksandr (talk) 23:06, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure this list is going to be maintainable but if it is Lord William Forbes-Sempill will need a mention.©Geni (talk) 19:06, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Scope of article

message: It's of intrest 2603:6011:4102:C358:B0AF:924A:1D2E:BCDF (talk) 02:51, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  We need an article similar in nature for the Axis 

message: I randomly checked two names. One was acquitted of treason and the other joined the SS to get out of a POW camp then deserted from the SS. Also, many entries on the list are uncited Elinruby (talk) 19:59, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  This list needs a reality check and a definition of treason
Talk:Shusei Nagaoka

message: Might this somehow be included as, say, an external link? http://www.kanyeuniversecity.com/blog/?em3106=242903_-1__0_~0_-1_11_2009_0_0&em3298=&em3282=&em3281=&em3161= --LegitimateAndEvenCompelling (talk) 15:19, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Artwork in blog?
Talk:Ottawa Catholic School Board

message: I insist that the list of schools belongs on List of Ottawa, Ontario schools. That is what it's there for. -- Spinboy 2 July 2005 01:13 (UTC)
*Well is there even a way to link to the correct section? Kappa 2 July 2005 01:14 (UTC)
**Yes, it's been done before. Let me see if I can't try. -- Spinboy 2 July 2005 01:16 (UTC)
***Done. -- Spinboy 2 July 2005 01:19 (UTC)
****OK, well done. Kappa 2 July 2005 01:25 (UTC)
=== St. Margaret Mary's School ===
I feel that somehow we should add this school to Wikipedia. St. Margaret Mary's School was a part of the OCCDSB but was closed a few years ago. Any suggestions?
-Vvuser 15:37, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Talk content merged from [[Talk:Ottawa-Carleton Catholic School Board]] 

message: I feel that somehow we should add this school to Wikipedia. St. Margaret Mary's School was a part of the OCCDSB but was closed a few years ago. Any suggestions?
-Vvuser 15:37, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  St. Margaret Mary's School 

message: I tried to upload the new logo that appears on their website but I don't think I did it properly! Maybe someone can fix? I'm new --Yellowjbj (talk) 18:55, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo
Talk:Shortwave broadcasting in the United States

message: Whoever wrote it seems like they are upset SW doesn't have the kind of programming they want.--Dwdollar (talk) 06:25, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  SW has some interesting characters but this article is crap 

message: No mention of the Voice of America, KYOI, the commercial stations which operated prior to 1942, the various clandestine stations (mostly targetting Cuba) or the fact that most of the non-religious output on commercial SW stations is spoeech based consisting largely of fringe extreme rightwing politics and bizzare conspiricy theorists ? 84.13.206.199 (talk) 01:14, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Something sadly lacking

message: The second paragraph of this article contains this statement: 
"Critics of private broadcasting in the USA have argued that the service allows extremists to spread their message to others without fear of censorship,[1](debunked) while others argue that private shortwave broadcasters provide an important service in providing programming to people without access to other forms of uncensored media.[citation needed]"
The word "debunked" is stated as a fact even though Reference 1 supports the assertion. There is no citation for the debunking. The most that can be claimed (by the original author), is that the assertion is "said to be debunked," and even this needs a citation.
Here is a reference that suggests the assertion is in fact, not debunked. It is the (archived Dec 23, 2020) program schedule for WWCR (Nashville) showing Alex Jones "Info Wars" in 5 broadcast time slots. Alex Jones is widely reputed to be a conspiracy peddler.  https://web.archive.org/web/20201223030707/http://www.wwcr.com/program-guides/WWCR_Program_Guide.pdf  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stefanoaz (talk • contribs) 18:07, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Violation of attribution guidelines
Talk:SuperCalc

message: The year of release is currently listed as 1980. However, I have a photo from May 1981 that I took when I saw a beta version demonstrated on an Osborne 1 (a computer first shipped in production many weeks later in 1981) at the National Computer Conference and it was not complete at the time I spoke with the developers there.
Since that's sort of anecdotal, as backup I refer to the first reference here on this page written by Wally Feigenson, the program's product manager: "SuperCalc was commissioned by Adam Osborn for his first computer..." That would also imply 1981.
See also: "The Birth of SuperCalc" section of the Wikipedia page for Sorcim (apparently written by Wally Feigenson): "The product was introduced in April 1981 at the West Coast Computer Faire in the Osborne booth." ("Introduced" is not the same as "released" -- released is usually later for software from those days.)
I don't see any reasons given for having 1980 as a "released" year, but very strong reasons for 1981.
So, it should be 1981. That is still really early in spreadsheet history and gives SuperCalc the honored place it deserves. I still remember it as the first program similar to VisiCalc after VisiCalc's release, and one that continued to be a major player for years bringing an electronic spreadsheet to many people for the first time. (As co-creator of VisiCalc, released in 1979, I was watching the personal computer software market in those days.)
DanBricklin (talk) 23:04, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release year probably wrong - should be 1981 

message: Wasn't there ever any problem with taking the basic idea from VisiCalc? פשוט pashute ♫ (talk) 01:21, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  patent and rights with visicalc?
Talk:DOS Plus

message: There is a DOS+, which was an enhanced, drop-in replacement for CP/M 2.2, written by C.B. Falconer and released as shareware in 1986. Also Micro-Systems Software produced an OS for TRS-80 line called "DOSPlus". Apparently, Digital Research acquired the trademark for "DOSPlus" from Micro-Systems. Is it necessary to disambiguate these three OSes?
CNJECulver (talk) 08:30, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: If these other systems are discussed in Wikipedia, we certainly need some kind of disambiguation (probably a hatnote would be enough). However, I could not find them mentioned anywhere in Wikipedia so far. Did you? --Matthiaspaul (talk) 09:21, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  DOS Plus and DOS+
Talk:Intel DX2

message: I removed "(e.g. Quake)" regarding Pentium requirements because it runs on 486 processors. I still have an old 486, and it has Quake on it. It runs like #$%@ but it works. 24.107.65.240 (talk) 05:33, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quake did not require Pentiums... 

message: "It was the first chip to use clock doubling, whereby the processor runs two internal logic clock cycles per external bus cycle". From Atari TT page: "To make the system work with a 32 MHz 68030, Atari Corp. had to scale back their plans somewhat, and add a large amount of cache to the system. As a result, the processor runs at 32 MHz, while the system bus runs at 16 MHz. This is similar to the tactic employed by Apple with the ill-fated Macintosh IIvx and later employed by makers of PCs with an Intel 80486DX2 CPU."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Calimero (talk • contribs) 07:53, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  First chip to use clock doubling
Talk:List of Anglican diocesan bishops in Britain and Ireland

message: There is already a list of all the he diocese in the British Isles, a list of all the bishops is only slightly different because it includes suffragans. Anyone reading the diocosan pages will just find these same links, a seperate list page is a not very helpful. Magjozs (talk) 17:57, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page seems redundant
Talk:OpenRISC

message: It seems that some of the external references are not connected to the article. Three references to Dynalith and one to OVP, neither of which are referenced in the article. I propose (subject to comments) to simplify to one reference to each, with an explanation of their relevance in the main text.Jeremybennett (talk) 16:19, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the same applies to the See Also links. I don't think LEON, OpenSPARC, S1 Core or Mico32 belong here. They are about open hardware designs in general. Jeremybennett (talk) 16:21, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

text: I've pruned the references as suggested above. Jeremybennett (talk) 16:54, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

message: Tagged this article as low importance.  -download | sign! 22:16, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importance
Talk:List of Antonov An-2 operators

message: North Korea seems to have quite a large fleet of AN-2s http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/7066087.stm  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.67.158.52 (talk) 13:13, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  North Korea 
Talk:Zilog Z380

message: I've tagged this article for notability because it fails WP:PRODUCT. Even if deep, independent coverage and a claim to notability were present, the content should still be listed in the company's main page, or the product line page, since there's so little here -- again, per WP:PRODUCT. -- Mikeblas (talk) 23:09, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: The Z380 is object code compatible with the Z80. Says so at the start of chapter one of the user manual referenced in the page.
82.70.14.226 (talk) 20:53, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Factually Incorrect ??
Talk:List of Arab League countries by population

message: It seems that in the past there has been a back and forth as to which countries should be included on the list either because of a dispute about whether the country is "Arab" (Chad, Somalia) or whether an entity is considered a country (Western Sahara, Palestine). I think as a general rule of thumb, this list should include all states and territories from Arab_World#States_and_territories. Any thoughts on this? Badums (talk) 15:31, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Included Countries in the List 

message: Eritrea is not a member of the Arab League (as  the table suggests). 85.70.117.103 (talk) 17:28, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eritrea 

message: Isn't Iran considered as an Arab country? --83.130.107.195 (talk) 19:00, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about Iran? 

message: I've linked that official estimates column to the WP's central population page. Not sure where those figures in the Current population column are from, but they seam wildly outdated. Guarapiranga (talk) 23:17, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outdated estimates 

message: Comoros and Djibouti are not Arab countries just like Somalia isn’t Nlivataye (talk) 10:05, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Enough 

message: Shouldn’t we exclude expats numbers in Gulf countries which make up 90% of Emirati, Qatar pop and more than half of Kuwait, Bahrain and a third of Saudi and Oman which will make the actual Arab pop significantly smaller Nlivataye (talk) 10:07, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a list of Arab countries by population, not a list of Arab populations by countries. — 𝐆𝐮𝐚𝐫𝐚𝐩𝐢𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐠𝐚 ☎ 02:06, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gulf countries
Talk:List of early microcomputers

message: ==Untitled==
A company named Digital Group sold computer kits that could use either a Z80 processor or a 6800? processor.  (I built the Z80 version.)  Does anyone remember what year the product became available?  If so, it could be added to the list.  VoteFair (talk) 20:13, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: No. No microprocessor, and only suitable for trivial operations.  A logic trainer, really. --Wtshymanski (talk) 17:31, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Digital Group

message: A company named Digital Group sold computer kits that could use either a Z80 processor or a 6800? processor.  (I built the Z80 version.)  Does anyone remember what year the product became available?  If so, it could be added to the list.  VoteFair (talk) 20:13, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: - true. But we have a triangle tab to replace the hard to understand "move" tab. Let alone getting a spell checker that works with either major variety of English. --Wtshymanski (talk) 01:40, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Table editing

message: Should we add the Simon (computer)? Sciking (talk) 12:25, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: No. No microprocessor, and only suitable for trivial operations.  A logic trainer, really. --Wtshymanski (talk) 17:31, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Simon 

message: Why are not in this list include Intel Intellec (first model used first commercial available CPU 4-bit Intel 4004)? It even predated Altair 8080, among others early microcomputers.
--Paburo fg 00 (talk) 22:55, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about Intel Intellect?
Template talk:Carolina Panthers roster

message: As of right now, Jake Delhomme has not been placed on IR.  He's out for the season, but I suppose they won't place him on IR until another QB can be signed.  See here.  SashaCall (Sign!)/(Talk!) 01:59, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: For anyone interested on up-to-date transactions, I've found the mot reliable and updated websites are usually Rotoworld.com, CBS Sportsline, ESPN and KFFL.com.►Chris NelsonHolla! 02:09, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delhomme 

message: Change Elliott Fry's jersey number from "--" to "8" as stated; https://www.panthers.com/team/players-roster/elliott-fry/ Schenb371 (talk) 02:22, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Eagles 24/7 (C) 02:24, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 23 April 2020 

message: Remove Luke Kuechly from  the roster. He retired in January of 2020. This is a necessary edit. 206.195.75.252 (talk) 17:28, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Please provide a source that Kuechly has been placed on reserve/retired by the Panthers. Eagles 24/7 (C) 18:16, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 28 April 2020 

message: Remove Luke Keuchly Redskins fan who rules (talk) 15:29, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Please provide a source stating he has been placed on reserve/retired by the team. Eagles 24/7 (C) 15:34, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 29 April 2020
Template talk:Historical currencies of Israel

message: The subdivision of the Israeli lira was named agora in 1960. In 1980 the lira was replaced with the sheqel and the agora with new agora (agora ħadaša). In 1985 the sheqel was replaced with new sheqel and the new agora with agora. Now, I know it sounds confusing, because the "old sheqel" goes with "new agora" and the "new sheqel" goes with "agora", but then again, had the Bank of Israel named the new sheqel's subdivision "new agora" it would have created confusion with the subdivision of the "old sheqel". DrorK 13:06, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Agora and new agora
Talk:List of archbishops of Cyprus

message: According to the article Crosier, the Archbishop of Cyprus enjoys the unique privilege of using a crosier in the form of an imperial scepter.  Does anyone have a picture of an Archbishop of Cyprus holding such a crosier? J S Ayer (talk) 03:49, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crosier 

message: Why is the current one Georgios I if there was already a Georgios in 750 AD? 82.36.70.45 (talk) 01:30, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Numbering
Talk:Casio FX-850P

message: The file :File:CASIO FX-850P.jpg currently used in the infobox should be replaced or removed as it makes an unnecessary and non-neutral allusion to Wikipedia (see WP:SELF). Finnusertop  (talk) 16:14, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  File:CASIO FX-850P.jpg
Talk:Texas Instruments LPC Speech Chips

message: Bally/Midway NFL Football game used a slightly different Squawk & Talk board than their pinball games, but still used the TMS5200 - it didn't use the TMS5220.  Exact same board as used in Discs of Tron (I should know - I'm using a S&T board from an NFL Football in my DoT).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.68.161.120 (talk) 00:36, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Accuracy of article

message: Anyone care to explain what a chirp table is in the article? ShadyCrack (talk) 19:35, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chirp table?
Talk:Zilog eZ80

message: The article states:
::Available at up to 50 MHz (2004), the performance is comparable to a Z80 clocked at 200 MHz if fast memory is used […] or even higher in some applications (a 16-bit addition is 11 times as fast as in the original). <Omission and markup added by discussant.>
Keeping in mind that a Z80 is usually clocked with 2,5, 4 or maybe 8 MHz, the last bold striked clause seems to be irritating (at least 200 Mhz means we are talking about being 25 upto 80 times faster). I guess that there is meant that the eZ80 is 11 times faster at same clock speed as a Z80 regarding 16 bit addition. Please clarify. -- Pemu (talk) 11:42, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: @Pemu The ADD HL, rr takes 1 cycle on the eZ80, but 3 cycles on the Z80. In this case, it is 3x the speed on this instruction alone. It doesn't make sense either. Imclevor (talk) 12:38, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It actually does to me. If the clock speed is 2-3x faster and the addition instruction is 3x faster, then it would be approximately 10x faster. Imclevor (talk) 12:41, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

text:  Are you sure about the cycles? As far as I remember, one distinguishes clock cycles and machine cycles (the latter consisting of round about 4 clock cycles each). I am not familiar with Z80 programming, but ADD HL,… takes about 11 cycles according to . This feels like 3 machine cycles. -- Pemu (talk) 22:10, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: n Times faste than Z80?

message: I would argue that the eZ80 is both an 8-bit and a 24-bit processor. The ALU is 24 bit. The registers are 24 bit although they can be used as three 8-bit registers. The instruction set consists of instructions for 8-bit data (legacy Z80) and instructions for 24-bit data. Similarly, the NEC V20 / V30 would be both 16-bit processors and 8-bit processors because they have an 8080 mode. Cheers, Drahtlos (talk) 12:54, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: This has been hashed over repeatedly for the last 20 years - the ALU size does not define the categorization. The Nova was a 16-bit machine in spite of having a 4-bit ALU, and the Z80 was an 8-bit machine in spite of having 16-bit instructions. This example a further extension of the original Z80 model in every way and the ISA remains very 8-bit oriented. Maury Markowitz (talk) 13:14, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

text: 24-bit registers are split into three sections, two of which can be directly used. For example, the 24-bit HL register is comprised of three 8-bit sections: H, L, and HLU. HLU is the middle bytewhichbut cannot be used directly. In theory, it is possible to use HLU by bit- shifting, but it is easier just to use 3 8-bit registers for three 8-bit values. Imclevor (talk) 12:13, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  24bit? 

message: The eZ80 is not totally compatible with the Z80 as the article claims. Certain useless but documented instructions change behaviour. In practice this is not a problem because normal code does not use those instructions but for the general case it is not a true statement.
82.71.94.194 (talk) 12:25, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Compatibility
Talk:AMULET (processor)

message: What is the PAL group? There isn't any reference to it. Pkunk (talk) 11:43, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  PAL group 