Talk:Noitamina

message: Is there a more accurate category this could be in? Shojo and Josei may have made sense when it was only doing those demographics, but the slot never intended to only target a female audience, so they seem a little irrelevant now... Doceirias (talk) 23:43, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categories 

message: The article says it's a programming block, so presumably there's a specific broadcast day/time for it -- so, when? Seems to be a fairly major piece of info missing here. —Quasirandom (talk) 03:54, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have no idea why it wasn't mentioned previously, but I've updated it accordingly with the correct information. ···巌流? · talk to ganryuu  05:23, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thankee. Useful and concise, too. —Quasirandom (talk) 16:50, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Time? 

message: There are a lot of gaps here of more than one week in-between series. This is atypical; I've never heard of an 11-episode anime outside this block. What does Fuji TV show at 00:45 on Thursday nights during those gaps? --Shay Guy (talk) 18:22, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gaps 

message: * The day and time are written as "Thursday night from 24:45 to 25:15". While writing things like this in Japanese is quite common, does anyone ever use the system in English? Wouldn't it be better to instead translate it into "Friday night from 0.45 to 1.15 AM"? This is English Wikipedia, so in my opinion English date & time formats should be used. (212.247.11.156 (talk) 18:38, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Day and time format 

message: Isn't noitaminA a "brand" for Anime with a certain (high) artistic Value/Quality than typical "for-the-Masses"-Anime? I mean, most of the Series shown on noitaminA are somewhere betweeen weird and borderline insane (in a positive manner) and most Networks would probably not bother produce and air them because of the high risk of low ratings (Although admittedly, many noitaminA shows got really popular). Well, I think that point deserves to be researched.  --104.243.243.29 (talk) 21:08, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I remember watching an interesting analysis on Youtube on this topic, which got me interested in the network in the first place. I agree that Noitamina has a great amount of high quality animation. Maybe it "deserves to be researched", but Wikipedia is hardly the place to suggest that. We don't have researchers here, just people compiling an encyclopedia of existing research. Do you know any professionally published works talking about the general value or quality of works released through Noitamina? ~Mable (chat) 22:05, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  noitaminA as a "brand" for artistic and quality anime 

message: Why is there a column for North American licensees? This article is about a Japanese programming block; how is having North American licensee even relevant to a Japanese block? In addition, the column is susceptible to factual errors because determining a licensee for a series is a lot more vague and arbitrary than it seems (eg: Are exclusive streaming services licensees? How did the original author know whether something was a master license?). Furthermore, other articles, like Animeism, +Ultra, Noise (TV programming block) do NOT have a North American licensee column at all. I propose that the column should be removed. Alex Tenshi (talk) 12:51, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is there a North American license column?