Talk:Avro Manhattan

message: Knight of Malta? That suggests heavy Roman Catholicism, unless it comes from one of the other self-styled orders.  The website http://www.srpska-mreza.com/library/facts/Baron-Manhattan.html says he was also a Knight of the House of Savoy as well as a Knight Templar and a Knight of the Order of Mercedes.  It all seems rather dubious to me.  --Henrygb 21:15, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: 1

message: I find rather strange that you can't buy any book of Avro Manhattan directly from Amazon.com.--Rocator 16:28, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I found Manhattan cited in this "Initial Membership List of the Knights of Malta" with improbable names.
In the article we are talking about this or about the real order of Knights of Malta?Initial Membership List of the Knights of Malta--Domics (talk) 11:20, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  knight of Malta? 

message: Additional material is clearly needed. I have added a short section (Manhattan's death) with material from another book that has online excerpts of the part quoted (the small additional mention of the post-burial notice from the same book was accessed using a Google Books Preview Search). After the words "in any newspaper" I have omitted the words "in the world" as that claim, while it might have been a reasonable and correct assumption by a historian, is not provable. I was a little concerned that the text, as with much of Manhattan's writings it seems, invites accusations of conspiracy theories. On the other hand, both Avro Manhattan and George Lucien Gregoire appear to be highly qualified, holding responsible posts even if their writings are controversial. Their books are also well annotated in scholarly fashion. I looked for some Roman Catholic rebuttals, but didn't find much beyond rant. The Conspiracy Encycopedia (Thom Burnett) says that Manhattan's theories rely on a particular way of seeing things, which is true for most of history. Some of Manhattan's work has been supported by academic John Cornwell (writer), a link to which I will add separately.http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/vatican/esp_vatican55.htm Cornwell is not without his critics either, but his work is substantial enough not to be dismissed out of hand and is clearly relevant to a page on Manhattan.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Parzivalamfortas (talk • contribs) 16:01, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional material

message: I find it somewhat hard to believe that he was an accredited philosopher, which generally refers to someone who has at least some sort of a doctorate in philosophy. It would not appear that this person had such a doctorate, and it doesn't even appear that his education at the Sorbonne and London School of Economics is verifiable. Or is it? Laval (talk) 01:03, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Philosopher?

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Avro Manhattan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080516122006/http://www.cephas-library.com:80/catholic/catholic_vaticans_billions_1.html to http://www.cephas-library.com/catholic/catholic_vaticans_billions_1.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071005063202/http://www.cephas-library.com/catholic/catholic_vatican_in_world_politics_introduction.html to http://www.cephas-library.com/catholic/catholic_vatican_in_world_politics_introduction.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:28, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified