lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Yuan Shang

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Jreferee 19:35, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: Why does this one have diacritic marks? Other ancient Chinese don't, such as Cao Cao and Liu Bei. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 03:58, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Something is preventing a page move. Seeing that you're an admin, can you move it to Yuan Shang for us? _dk 05:01, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd imagine the user who created this article thought it would be more formal or simply didn't realise they weren't necessary.  I'm going to backtrack through his/her contributions list and see if there're any more like this one. Gamer Junkie 06:05, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, it was moved from Yuan Shang, but the mover screwed up and so I can't move it back. (Since the page's history is now written with something other than a redirect) I've already reverted most of that user's moves. _dk 06:37, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This problem is still present (the article name is still 'Yuán Shàng'); any way to fix it? Redmac54 (talk) 20:19, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, you can request that an admin move the page on Wikipedia:Move requests. _dk (talk) 22:29, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name
Talk:Xi Zhicai

message: I removed the  label on this article: Xi Zhicai actually doesn't make an entrance in Romance of the Three Kingdoms and is only briefly mentioned in historical sources. I feel however that a reference is needed for “Xi Zhicai was indeed a very brilliant tactician under Cao Cao, playing many very important roles”. --Sixsous 13:05, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done; added references from Book of the Later Han. I don't think any records show what he actually did, so I removed that statement too. C xong (talk) 02:35, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Yang Feng

message: this is another favorite Chinese general that I think is cool
I finish reediting him, i hope ya'll like it
Laterzhan281 (talk) 22:08, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: </font>, Historycally, Yang Feng left Li Jue, and went to mountains to became a bandit, later he came back to Emperor to protect Emperor, later Emperor was attacked by Li Jue and Guo Si. Emperor was in critical condition, then Yang Feng called up the Han Xian to protect Emperor. Do you think this procedure means that Yang Feng joined Han Xian? (Gauge00 (talk) 18:33, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: As a paraphrasing, yes, I do, but my paraphrasing can be expanded. However, the expanded paraphrasing is probably better suited to Yang Feng's own article, since, as far as his relationship with Dong Cheng is concerned, he left Li Jue's service and eventually served in the White Wave Bandits with Han Xian, a co-helper of Emperor Xian alongside Dong Cheng. Benjitheijneb (talk) 15:51, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Yang Feng's past

message: "After having Emperor Xian and the new central government firmly under his control, Cao Cao led his troops to attack Yang Feng in November 196 and defeated him. Xu Huang, one of Yang Feng's subordinates, surrendered and became a general under Cao Cao. While Yang Feng fled south to join the warlord Yuan Shu, Cao Cao proceeded to conquer Liang State (Yang Feng's previous base)." What kind of 'Liang State' is this? The page Liang (realm) shows there were many Liangs; Han-era Liang would have had its capital city at Suiyang District, which lies to the east of Xuchang. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 17:05, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Liang State'
Talk:Pentagon Memorial

message: I updated the part of the description dealing with the direction the benches face , though upon further reading they aren't really "benches" per say... But here's a ref: http://memorial.pentagon.mil/description.htm I'll leave it to someone else to write a better discription if need be. JamesBenjamin (talk) 20:32, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Direction of memorial benches 

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 20:33, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: Are the hijackers among the 184 people memorialized? 68.63.86.62 (talk) 23:03, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No.  Including the hijackers, 189 people were killed. --Aude (talk) 23:12, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hijackers? 

message: I was at the memorial on 9/11/15, and after the special ceremony for special visitors, I noticed several people with flowers at several of the areas. I noticed also that a few people there were sitting on the structures, apparently grieving, and or paying their respects. I found no offense in this action.  Later, retelling this experience to someone, they immediately stated that to sit on the structures was disrespectful, I disagree.  Please let me know the proper and respectful actions, thanks,  JIMBO  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.213.36.2 (talk) 17:11, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  respectful viewing 
Category talk:Regions of China

message: I think we need an article on Central China.  Badagnani 01:20, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ironicly,China in chinese means the central.So there are regions called central plain,roughly corresponding the Henan,however there's no central china in Chinese geography.--Ksyrie 20:33, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Cannot it be 华中? - Privacy 16:38, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Central China
Talk:Janus-Merritt Strategies

message: definitely deserves its own page.  as well as a lot of cleanup / sourcing.  as rambling as the text is, it does seem worth saving, which seems easier to do given a space of its own.  (after its been rehabilitated, we can pare down the original blurb from the GN page.) Whiskey Pete 01:20, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  forked from [[Grover Norquist]]
Talk:Benjamin Strong Jr.

message: This article perpetrates the myth that the Federal Reserve is some sort of banking conspiracy.  Yes there was a "secret" meeting that resulted in the Aldrich Plan; however, after the Panic of 1907 there was much discussion and interest in reforming the banking system in the US.  The Aldrich Plan was devised in secret as the New York financial leaders knew it would fail if the public realized who devised the plan.  And that is what happened: the Aldrich Plan was indeed submitted to Congress and was voted down.  Although the Aldrich Plan serves as an outline for the subsequent Currency Bill (which created the Federal Reserve System) there were substantive changes made.  The most important was the addition of the Board of Governors which effectively placed control out of the hands of the bankers (the Aldrich Plan called for commercial bankers to run the system).  Gerald Howard, 2-21-07 71.140.198.6 01:23, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The Jekyll Island episode is controversial and interesting, but though I believe it is highly plausible, it must be presented as CONJECTURE, while here it is presented as plain fact.
But even more obviously, this article contains extremely little about Benjamin Strong.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.81.227.196 (talk) 17:46, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's the subject--Benjamin Strong or the alleged conspiracy? 

message: The article cites only Charles Kindleberger - once the doyen of economic historians, but two generations ago - and Murray Rothbard - a fringe economist, revered by a small group, but disregarded as a serious source by most others - as witnesses for assessing Strong's performance at the Fed in the 1920. The economic history literature of the past 30 years has given us much more to draw on, i.e. Eichengreen, Temin, Bernanke, Meltzer, Bordo.Henry Kaspar (talk) 14:13, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Fringe Economists

message: "eventually succeeding his boss"  Where is the source for this? and how long is 'eventually'?
"Economic historian Charles P. Kindleberger states that Strong was one of the few U.S. policymakers interested in the troubled financial affairs of Europe in the 1920s, and that had he not died in 1928, just a year before the Great Depression, he might have been able to maintain stability in the international financial system" Did Kindleberger really say this (which page in the book?)? Is this not the opinion of Friedman and Schwartz?Marc.1337 (talk) 10:11, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  sourcing
Talk:Ben Johnson

message: Ben Johnson, born and lived most of his live in San Francisco has broken the world record of the most accurate and fastest game of Dance Dance Revolution (DDR) and Guitar Hero at the fastest level of speed. He beats the former world record holder Ken by 14% in DDR and 18% in Guitar Hero! That already brought him into the Guinness Book of Records 2009! —Preceding unsigned comment added by anon1 (talk • contribs) 04:08, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ben Johnson (2008 World Record) 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ben Johnson (poker player). Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Certes (talk) 12:00, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ben Johnson (poker player) listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Sun Kuang

message: This page is full not only of inconsistencies, but it's also full of invalid information. I will be changing this page and encourage anybody to reformat it, but rest assured that the information will come only from historical sources such as Sanguozhi and other works. It's astounding that pages on people who only appear in historical records, such as Sun Shao, son of Sun Ce, will be tagged with "fails to distinguish between fact and fiction," and yet this page, which contains only fiction, contains the same tag. Perhaps Wikipedia needs a "this article is completely inaccurate" tag? Schlechtentag 06:11, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: How about a ? _dk 23:50, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page needs a complete rewrite.
Talk:Yu Quan (general)

message: Just reading the novel - others should add more:
*about "Yu Quan was then later asked if he wished to submit to Wei through Wei officer Wang Ji, but refused and ended up being killed in battle": this is mentioned in the novelLuo Guanzhong, Three Kingdoms: A Historical Novel: Volume IV, translated by Moss Roberts. page 2027 (in chapter 112). Foreign Languages Press. Tenth Printing 2007. First Edition 1995. Beijing, China 1995. . ----Erkan Yilmaz 10:09, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Re: clear distinction between fact and fiction
Talk:Yuan Weishi

message: I'm not sure if this article is a biography or an article for history statement. It doesn't concern to the person that the title implicitly dedicated but mostly to some history research statements.
I think this article should be edited to conform to a biography.
JC Valeron (talk) 02:58, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arilang1234's edits 

message: The underlying subject matter is largely out of my area of expertise, but I am going to go ahead and remove a large amount of material that has nothing to do with Yuan himself, as irrelevant to the article.  The rest of the article will still need cleanup.  (It should be noted that the article also currently fails to show sufficient notability by its own text, although the corresponding Chinese Wikipedia article made clear his sufficient notability.)  --Nlu (talk) 21:21, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: On second thought, I simply decided to remove anything other than the lead.  The current material in there is simply way too off proper grammar/diction to be salvageable for anyone even with proper expertise in the field.  Someone will have to redo the article later.  As it stands, the text was a demonstration of where the text present can be so awful that any useful information that it provides becomes meaningless to any reader.  --Nlu (talk) 21:23, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of non-Yuan-related material 

message: If the reader wants to get more information, her should read McGregor, The Party (esp. the part on the Boxer Rebellion). --13Peewit (talk) 02:08, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  More information
Talk:Tina Chen

message: What about that borderline-retarded girl named Tina Chen that Perez Hilton makes fun of? More people know her than this actress. Doesn't that make her notable? 68.0.119.139 (talk) 07:16, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I suggest to review WP:NBIO and WP:GNG to determine whether the other person is notable. — BarrelProof (talk) 17:49, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Other Tina Chen
Talk:Polydichloric Euthimal

message: How can it be a recreation if I just made it up off the top of my head after watching the movie. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pazuzu413 (talk • contribs) 
:I'm pretty sure this page existed before, possibly with a different spelling. It doesn't make a difference whether you knew about the original article or not; it would still be recreation of deleted material. Either way, it doesn't need its own article. - Zepheus <ゼィフィアス> 05:26, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Final Approach

message: Final Approach (Anime) now has it's own page at Final Approach (Anime) so please DO NOT EDIT OR VANDALISE THIS PAGE.
This needs a disambiguation page. Anyone looking for the anime is going to type in "Final Approach" in the search bar and get re-directed to an article about airplane landings. Question2 04:24, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Wang Zhong (Three Kingdoms)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 18:15, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Wang Zhong (Han dynasty) →  – No other Wang Zhong has a page on Wikipedia. Timmyshin (talk) 06:56, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The Chinese Wikipedia lists this many meanings for Wang Zhong https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E7%8E%8B%E5%BF%A0 _dk (talk) 19:08, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

text: * Stub now under AfD. Timmyshin (talk) 02:59, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
===Post RM===
It should also be noted  that Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wang Zhong (Ming dynasty), referred to above, has closed as keep,  despite the efforts of a now banned sockpuppet. Andrewa (talk) 16:38, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: It should also be noted  that Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wang Zhong (Ming dynasty), referred to above, has closed as keep,  despite the efforts of a now banned sockpuppet. Andrewa (talk) 16:38, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Post RM
Talk:List of National Wrestling Alliance championships

message: I was looking up information for an NWA Australian Heavyweight Championship of some kind and on Solie.org,  I seen that there is an active NWA Australian National Championship that is active as there was a title change in 2010.  But it says in the defunct championships that it is defunct.  But it is seemingly active.  So if nobody has any objections, then I will move it to the active championships.  Mr. C.C.Hey yo!I didn't do it! 01:19, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  NWA Australian National Championship 
Talk:Gurun Princess Rong'an

message: This article presently is titled Pricess Rongan.  Romanized spelling of Asian names is always an issue, and it seems the references I've found prefer the variant is "Rong-An" or "Rong 'An". There are no hits for "Rongan" but Google books gives this hit here and another here under the variants; I've added the books themselves as references, and suspect that a move to one spelling or the other may be appropriate.  The others can be kept as redirects. Xymmax (talk) 19:22, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  References and possible move
Talk:WRFN-LP

message: This article seems to villify WANT's efforts to protect its signal, does it not? --Zpb52 01:53, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The article doesn't even mention WANT's efforts to protect its signal or WRFN's counter-claims to the FCC, so I'm not sure I understand your statement, Zpb52. Considering the longstanding battle between the two stations, this article seems remarkably NPOV to me. Kaldari (talk) 16:41, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV discussion

message: This is plainly not true. Democracy Now for instance is carried by WETS in Johnson City and by WOZO in Knoxville.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.160.130.28 (talk) 01:16, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "WRFN is the only radio station in Tennessee that broadcasts programming from the Pacifica radio network"
Talk:Petrus Apianus

message: The article states:
However, those dates do not make sense.
In the German Wikipedia, it is mentioned:
I suspect that first date should maybe be 1528? Sejtam (talk) 07:49, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dated of print shop 

message: something is wrong  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.69.140.138 (talk) 17:27, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  This print shop was active between 1543 and 1540
Talk:Sandy Hook, Connecticut

message: Please review the following:
# Please follow the Wikipedia USCITY guideline for layout and content.
# Please document your source by citing a reference to prove your text is verifiable.
# Please add text that has a neutral point of view instead of sounding like an advertisement.
# Please ensure a person meets Wikipedia Notability requirements before adding to the "Notable People" section.
# Please read the "Editing, Creating, and Maintaining Articles" chapter from the book Wikipedia : The Missing Manual, .
• Sbmeirow • Talk •  07:19, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important Tips Before Editing This Article 

message: Sandy Hook is DEFINATELY NOT a borough... the only borough currently in Fairfield county is Newtown (borough). It is a neighborhood. Rpgman456 01:54, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Borough

message: I added and started the infobox, but others may wish to add to its contents.--Epeefleche (talk) 09:43, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox 

message: Many articles on places have information on how they acquired their names. Do we know for this one? HiLo48 (talk) 10:25, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: My first thought was that it was somehow named after Sandy Hook in New Jersy, but that is some 90 miles south. Searching Google Books I found Connecticut Historical Collections published by John Warner Barber mentioning the area had sandy patches and looking at the map the river does hook there. <meaningful pause> I couldn't find a direct reference explaining the name. But the people settling the area were so creative as to call their new town "Newtown", I wouldn't hope too much to find an interesting story behind the name.  Richard-of-Earth (talk) 21:23, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  How did Sandy Hook get its name?
Talk:Yang Zhensheng

message: "Department of State bulletin". 10 June 1944. p. 537. The representative of the National University of Peking is Dr. Chen-sheng Yang, who has been acting dean of the College of Arts and Literature in the absence of Dr. Hu Shih.1{...}1Chinese Ambassador to the United States, 1938-42. https://archive.org/details/departmentofstatx1044unit/page/536 Geographyinitiative (talk) 10:09, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this Dr. Chen-sheng Yang?
Talk:Tarence Kinsey

message: :Add  # Support  or  # Oppose  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.  Please remember that this survey is not a vote, and please provide an explanation for your recommendation.
====Survey - in support of the move====
#Obviously my vote is Yes --Downwards 01:56, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: #Obviously my vote is Yes --Downwards 01:56, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey - in support of the move
Talk:1986–87 NFL playoffs

message: Question about the wild-card score for this game:
====AFC: New York Jets 35, Kansas City Chiefs 15====
at Giants Stadium, East Rutherford, New Jersey
*Game time: 12:30 p.m. EST
*TV announcers (NBC): Marv Albert and Bob Griese
*Game attendance: 75,212
Quarterback Pat Ryan led the Jets to the victory with 3 touchdown passes. The Chiefs scored first on a 67-yard drive capped by running back Jeff Smith. On their ensuing possession, the Jets faced fourth down and 6 on the Kansas City 33-yard line. Rather than attempt a long field goal, Ryan faked a handoff and rushed for a 24 yard gain. Two plays later, running back Freeman McNeil scored on a 4-yard rushing touchdown. In the second period, Ryan completed two touchdown pass: a 1-yarder to McNeil and an 11-yarder to wide receiver Al Toon. On the first play of the second half, Jets linebacker Kevin McArthur returned an interception 21 yards for a touchdown. Ryan later clinched the victory in the fourth period with a 6-yard touchdown pass to tight end Billy Griggs. The Chiefs' only scores in the second half was a blocked punt recovery in the end zone, and an intentional safety by the Jets.
McNeil finished the game with 135 rushing yards, 3 receptions for 16 yards, and 2 touchdowns.
*Scoring
**KC - Smith 1 run (kick failed) KC 6-0
**NYJ - McNeil 4 run (Leahy kick) NYJ 7-6
**NYJ - McNeil 1 pass from Ryan (Leahy kick) NYJ 14-6
**NYJ - Toon 11 pass from Ryan (Leahy kick) NYJ 21-6
**NYJ - McArthur 21 interception return (Leahy kick) NYJ 28-6
**KC - Lewis recovered blocked punt in end zone (kick failed) NYJ 28-12
**NYJ - Griggs 6 pass from Ryan (Leahy kick) NYJ 35-12
**KC - Safety, Jennings ran out of end zone NYJ 35-15
The way the score reads, if Chiefs kicker Nick Lowery missed BOTH PAT's, there is no way one could get 15 points in the way the score is currently presented (unless the edit made a mistake and Lowery made one of the PAT's). Anything else...  WAVY 10 Fan (talk) 01:59, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed, Lowery did make the PAT after Lewis' blocked punt return.(link removed) Zzyzx11 (Talk) 04:55, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chiefs-Jets Wild Card score
Talk:Wu School

message: I don't know about merging this into Southern School. The Southern School is a very broad over-arching term, kind of like Neoclassicism, while the Wu School is actually a much more specific group of particular individuals at a particular time... I think they're better separate. LordAmeth 17:12, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Aha! I get it. It's not clear in the articles. I'll see if I can clarify. --sparkitTALK 20:37, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?
Talk:Novi Ligure murder

message: Reading this article about a notorious murder makes me think of similarities to the Sacco-Vanzetti case in the USA in the 1920's when Sicilian immigrants (also anarchists or syndicalists) were scapegoated for a crime (which they probably did not commit) and executed.  In the Italian case, it appears that the Italian magistrates were not swayed by public opinion to the extent that the framed Albanian immigrants were similarly dispatched.  This is a truly interesting case and deserves further expansion. PeterHuntington 19:46, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sacco-Vanzetti Revisited 

message: I changed the name of this article from "Novi Ligure Homicide" to "Novi Ligure Murder."  It's called the "omicidio di Novi Ligure" in Italian, but "omicidio" translates to English as "murder" rather than "homicide" -- it's a false cognate.  The English sources for this article call it the "Novi Ligure Murder." -Fagles 20:18, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name change