lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Muscular Development

message: I started this page but as of right now it is a hopeless stub, I have solicited help from some people over at MD forums in the hope they will expand and improve on it. I am having trouble finding sources. If you would like to help please be bold. If you know where I can find sources to expand the article, but do not wish to do the work yourself, just post the sources here or at my talk page and I'll be glad to do it. Thanks in advance. Quadzilla99 16:01, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Call for Help

message: First issue of MD.
I also downloaded this image for use here however as the article is so short now it will just make it look choppy and ugly if I install it also. It is available if the article ever becomes encyclopedia quality. Quadzilla99 06:28, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Another Image
Category talk:Librarians

message: Should "State Librarians" and their equivalents (e.g., "Librarian of Congress") be considered librarians, even if they do not have a library degree and did not practice as librarians? I note that "Oliver Everett" is included here, despite the apparent absence of actual librarianship, and James Billingsley (Librarian of Congress) is not so included. Perhaps a "State Librarians" or "Official Librarians" or "Titular Librarians" category would be more accurate? LQ 18:31, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Nestor

message: Is it not wise to acknowledge the use of the word "Nestor" in the works of Isaac Asimov?  It seemed significant when I read him. 98.64.194.177 (talk) 01:38, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Asimov 

message: Likewise the works of Carlos Castenada.  Nestor was a significant character in his books. Revera (talk) 13:20, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Carlos Castenada

message: There are four Saints Nestor. Which image in Commons Category: Saint Nestor belongs to which one? Please disambiguate, it's confusing. Wiki-uk (talk) 20:49, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images of four Saints Nestor in ONE Commons Category > need disambiguation
Talk:Albert Odyssey (1993 video game)

message: Hi, I noticed that in the lede of this article it is mentioned that a Satellaview game entitled BS Albert Odyssey was broadcast in June 1996. The infobox goes on to describe a release of Albert Odyssey for the Satellaview on June 12, 1996. I cannot find any reliable sources for this information, though. I know of a Japanese website that has collected and reproduced the broadcast schedules from a number of different copies of the Satellaview-specific magazine, Satellaview Tsushin. That website covers June 12, 1996 in its entirety and I cannot find any mention of Albert Odyssey on this date. I can see that the game was actually broadcast for a time beginning on March 29, 1998, but I still find no mention of a game entitled BS Albert Odyssey...
So I've altered the Satellaview release date from June 12, 1996 to March 29, 1998 in order to match what is listed in Satellaview Tsushin, and I've tagged the BS Albert Odyssey claim for sources. I'm skeptical of its accuracy but information on Satellaview releases is scant at best so there can be no out-of-hand discounting of the possibility of sources to back up the claim. Cheers, -Thibbs (talk) 14:50, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds good. I know nothing about Satellaview broadcasts so I can't contribute anything confirming or refuting the claim, but your edits seem sensible given what we know so far.--Martin IIIa (talk) 21:40, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Satellaview versions
Talk:Blake Stone: Aliens of Gold

message: Who's that guy on the picture and what's the connection of that picture to this game? Calvero2 14:06, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably some dork off American Idol. Looking at the image page, it seems three different images have been uploaded over it in the last few weeks. I reverted the image.--Drat (Talk) 23:00, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture

message: The Mission 1, Floor 2 music sounds a lot like Led Zeppelin Immigrant Song.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.3.146.17 (talk) 23:26, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Mission 1, Floor 2 Music

message: No issues remain, tag removed.  However, it is weak on references. --Sigma 7 (talk) 14:41, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyedit, April 2009 

message: When you meet Dr. Goldfire he says "You'll never get me!" and "Ha ha ha ha!", sounding exactly like the Zygonaut in Moon Mine on the TI-99/4A. It'd be interesting to compare those sounds side by side. I bet the Blake Stone authors simply digitized those two speech samples from a TI computer's audio output. Bizzybody (talk) 08:08, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dr. Goldfire's voice 

message: I think the mention of 'special level features' needs to be clarified. The way it's phrased now is in more or less explicit comparison to Wolf 3D. But, why are colored key cards 'special'? That is only more use of the silver/gold keys in Wolf 3D, right? I don't see there being anything special about this specific feature.
Also, the secret rooms accessible through pushable wall blocks is not of itself unique or special to Blake Stone, this was in Wolf 3D as well. It is true that Blake Stone used this feature much more extensively than Wolf 3D ever did, so perhaps you could characterize it as a distinguishing feature instead. It would also be more informative to note that the pushable walls come from Wolf 3D.Walker222 (talk) 20:17, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gameplay
Talk:Caesar (video game)

message: The sentence was:
SimCity eventually offered historical city graphics to overlay its game engine but the underlying user interface and growth simulation remained unchanged.
The original edit in 2005 did not have the "eventually". Either way, it seems like this sentence should be about Caesar and not SimCity. However, I don't know much about Caesar, so I opted to simply remove the sentence.
RampagingCarrot (talk) 05:36, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed sentence from "Differences from SimCity" section
Talk:Crash N Burn (1993 video game)

message: Just wondering... why was the review link removed from this article. There's already so little info on this page as it is. It was shown as:
 ==External links==
 * Review by GameZero
BcRIPster (talk) 06:49, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why was the review removed with the recent change? 

message: So... this page actually has pretty good spot on information on the launch titles. But I know it's not a reliable source. I'll revisit this soon, but I wanted to make a note here for my own reference. BcRIPster (talk) 17:59, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Launch title controversy
Talk:CyberRace

message: Added a stub notice.  I actually own this, but I haven't played it for some time.  I may be able to do some reasearch and expand later. Shador5529 14:23, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub

message: Unfortunately, it appears this won't run under Win XP.  Has anyone else had this problem? Shador5529 16:09, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a DOS game. It doesn't run under newer OS. I play it under Win XP using DOSBox 0.63 --Bisco 11:35, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: DOS / OS

message: i had the console version once (segasaturn). i dunno if the plot was the same but i remember the character names are and the planets as well. did anybody played it? (jap version backcover/frontcover  -i owned-, pal version and north american version) Cliché Online 17:04, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks quite different from the DOS version. Only a similar plot and setting. Completly different designs esp. the sleds. But on the back cover of the pal version is the copyright of Cyberdreams 1993 and the title Cyber Race. Amazing. Thanks for bringing this up. Bisco 05:24, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: console port: cyber speedway

message: What about a bottom view of that model? Is it flat or does it have some detail? Bizzybody (talk) 08:21, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plastic model
Talk:Dino Dini's Goal

message: Propose merging Dino Dini's Soccer into Dino Dini's Goal; the former article itself confirms that the latter is just a Mega Drive/Genesis conversion of the Goal;
: Dino Dini's Soccer was a conversion of Goal! for the Amiga to the Sega Mega Drive (Genesis in North America) by Dino Dini, the author of the original version. Dino Dini's Soccer had all the relevant features of the Amiga version
and we don't normally have a separate article for conversions that go by a different name on different formats. Article content is generally decided on whether or not the subject is the same- this is the same subject. The SNES version was (apparently) slightly different, but I still don't think it warrants a separate article. Ubcule (talk) 19:59, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal
Talk:Fury of the Furries

message: Should this be a called a stub? I think all the important things are included in the article. 85.70.174.197 (talk) 14:14, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: the stub template. ~NerdyScienceDude (✉ message • changes) 00:01, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In my opinon, you should add the Skweeks franchise since it's part of it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:E000:2500:F000:19D3:BDC7:2BBA:834A (talk) 10:56, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Doing this now. Skcin7 (talk) 09:06, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Skweeks
Talk:The Labyrinth of Time

message: I seem to recall that music for The Labyrinth Of Time was the same as/very similar to some of the incidental music in its contemporary, The X-Files.
Is anyone able to confirm that Mark Snow was involved with this project?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Juux (talk • contribs) 23:04, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Music - Mark Snow? (X-Files) 
Talk:Lands of Lore

message: Who the hell put that crap in about Lands of Lore 2 having lackluster graphics?. I defy ANYONE to say that the first cave and it's puddles of water weren't mind-blowing. Yes, in comparison to 3D engines of the day, it didn't hold up, but in comparison to 2D/3D sprite based engines, it was the absolute pinnacle. Just because the graphics are sprites doesn't mean they're hideously ugly. They were based off high-detail, bump-mapped CGI renders.
The Direct3D patch simply takes it to a whole new level of radness. Obeejw 22:24, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Legacy: Realm of Terror

message: I have edited the page by adding some information about the game and a trivia. I own the game (bought on RadioShack in Miami), but I'm no english-speking native. So I ask for someone to review the english in the text. Thanks.
And I'm not sure if I should move this page to the wikipedia game-related sister project and also about the notability of the game. Bernardo Lopes 15:04, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've proof-read this page and added a sentence or two. I own this game as well and have played it many times (in fact I'm playing it again at the moment using DOSBox). I think it's notable, but it was overlooked at the time it was released for several reasons. There's plenty more info that could be added, hopefully I will get time to add some more later. BlueLightning 10:10, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Maelstrom (1992 video game)

message: There were two games published in 1992 under the title "Maelstrom". This one and the one I created at Maelstrom_(4X video game). http://www.mobygames.com/game/maelstrom  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.95.230.185 (talk) 18:55, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two games
Wikipedia talk:Primogeniture

message: This page was the subject of an MfD discussion closed on 5 October 2006.  The result was keep. Xoloz 15:36, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I just read the Primogeniture page, and ... dammit, I just bought the last of the Q-tips I needed! I suppose I could form colonies of ear-implanted mind control bacteria on them... ~Kylu (u|t)  01:14, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: MfD Result Notice

message: Were early adminships (2003 and before) created heirs-general instead of heirs-male? If so, who calls an adminship out of abeyance? Mackensen (talk) 12:21, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Underage people can get pregnant and get others pregnant. Anomo 07:03, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There is indeed no such thing as too young to be an admin, you might lose votes for admitting to being young but some very young admins have been appointed. Of course there is a difference between a 12 year old whose behaviour is sufficiently mature to please the RFA crowd and a fifteen year old who inherits an adminship and gets rapidly desysopped for misbehaviour. ϢereSpielChequers 12:57, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question 

message: I created a page for the B.R.I.T.T.A.N.I.C.A. Link, and somebody deleted it. Any way of getting it back? Sue Rangell[citation needed] 17:36, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  B.R.I.T.T.A.N.I.C.A. 

message: This article is badly out of date and needs to be updated in accordance with this. Primogeniture is only relevant for Admins with DNA, other systems need to be catered for. Obviously User:CloudNine would be inherited by rain, User:Sn0wflake slush and User:Stormie rainbow, but what happens with bots that evolve into AI admins? - rumour has it that at least one AI has already got through rfa. ϢereSpielChequers 19:38, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heirs human?
Talk:Michael Kammen

message: In rewriting this article, I deleted the "Star Trek" reference because it struck me as totally irrelevant to Professor Kammen's career.  But if it strikes someone as essential, go ahead and put it back in.  Drfryer 18:52, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A closer reading of this book finds that Kammen is not taking positions on whether the Constitution should be regarded as an organism, or even less on how it should be interpreted. He merely reports on how others have commented or on what has been happening, without expressing his own interpretative preferences. He does, however, frequently express dismay at the lack of understanding of the Constitution and constitutionalism. Bracton (talk) 00:38, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''A Machine That Would Go of Itself'' 

message: There's a broken link to a Kammen faculty page and when I checked the history faculty, he's not there at all. Anyone know about this? Thanks.Skywriter (talk) 09:46, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Not listed on Cornell faculty
Talk:MechWarrior (1993 video game)

message: Salvidrim!, if you have a chance can you please take a look at this one? Based on the story sections, it does appear to be a distinct game from MechWarrior (1989 video game). Given the popularity of the franchise, I am surprised that no one has added any sources over the past 12 years - I'm sure they must exist! 73.168.15.161 (talk) 17:40, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Salvidrim!, just to comment further, MechWarrior / Battletech is a very notable franchise, and all the other video games in the series have plenty of sources cited, so I have no idea how this one got overlooked! 73.168.15.161 (talk) 04:16, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I know how popular MechWarrior is. I'll keep this ping on my to-do list, probably for next week. :) Ben · Salvidrim! ✉ 04:18, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Salvidrim!, thanks for taking a look at this one! :) 73.168.15.161 (talk) 01:50, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: FAR from done. ;) I also hate the title. It's not the only MechWarrior game in 1993 or on the SNES. But what other choice do we have. I'll continue ruminating while until I'm done filling it out. Ben · Salvidrim! ✉ 02:15, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: MechWarrior (1993 Super Nintendo Entertainment System game) sounds pretty unwieldy.  :) 73.168.15.161 (talk) 04:27, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: If I go that way it would be (1993 SNES video game) anyways but.... it's ugly. Ben · Salvidrim! ✉ 05:16, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, that is dubious!  What other MechWarrior game came out in 1993 aside from this one? 73.168.15.161 (talk) 15:45, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The first one had a 1993 release on PC-98... Ben · Salvidrim! ✉ 17:44, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources
Talk:Might and Magic V: Darkside of Xeen

message: I just wanted to make a brief comment on the proposed merger. In general, I think few fanmade titles are notable enough for inclusion within Wikipedia. This case is an exception, however, because of the fact that 3DO officially released it as part of their Might and Magic compilation sets. Besides which, it's an entirely separate game from Darkside. – Sean Daugherty (talk) 13:27, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. The fact that it was recognised by 3D0 as part of the Might and Magic series, by its inclusion on the compilation sets, and billing on the box cover as a Might and Magic game, validates SoX's inclusion in Wikipedia. BreathingMeat 01:26, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thirded.  One needn't stretch to find reasons to deny the merger -- there are just no good rationales in favour of it. Pseudo Intellectual 06:36, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Swords of Xeen
Talk:Planet's Edge

message: This game is a remake of the game Space (198?) which was a remake of the public domain text-based Space I and Space II (1970's).  After the death of public domain in the late 80's everyone was busy "owning" old public domain games and re-writing gaming history until the game industry became less hostile in the mid 90's.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.181.84.127 (talk) 15:24, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: GOG.com has it as 1991. References have it as 1991. I recommend we change the date unless better info is found. Help? Oathed (talk) 13:01, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  1991 release?
Talk:List of professorships at the University of Dublin

message: Good idea. The regius professorships. What about the others? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.202.159.53 (talk • contribs)  20:54, 17 August 2006
The format available until 22nd Aug '06 is more attractive to the eye - (linked) Professorships listed first, then the details with the title of the Chair in bold. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.95.153.4 (talk • contribs)  19:22, 22 August 2006
:It wasn't in accordance with the way the other professorship lists look, and the heading level was too high (level 1 headings are never used in Wikipedia). Besides, the current holder of each chair is actually of no particular interest, and should probably not be on this page at all (I just didn't want to remove info when I refactored the page) — Wikipedia is not a directory, and such a list will soon be outdated anyway. It would be better if each chair linked to a a separate article which included a list of all earlier holders of the chair until and including the current one. You should work on slowly adding well-referenced articles on each professorship with a list of holders. There is perhaps a printed university history that includes such information? Look at other articles in the same category and the articles they link to (most of them are not models of perfection, but they will give you an idea...). Learn to use the cite.php reference system, which makes referencing very simple. I would also recommend you to get an account. up+l+and 17:42, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Realms of Arkania: Blade of Destiny

message: Are you sure this version was never completed? A Google search results in many hits. Matt Barton in particular mentions the ST port. SharkD (talk) 14:39, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes I'm sure. The Atari ST version was never completed: read the Atari Legends Guido Henkel interview (question #8). Guido Henkel was one of the founders/owners of Attic and one of the main developers of Blade of Destiny. This rumor properly comes from an old German pre-release magazine ad for the game (that is floating around the internet) stating something along the lines of ... on your PC, Amiga and Atari ST but the ST version was canned later on during development.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.123.250.125 (talk) 11:37, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Atari ST port 

message: I don't understand the reference in the article to Dungeon Master as being the "first 3d computer role-playing game". I would have thought that honor would go to Wizardry or Ultima. I don't feel that one could argue that Wizardry/Ultima are not 3D RPGs compared to Dungeon Mater without also discarding the designation for Dungeon Master by in turn comparing it to, say, Ultima Underworld, The Elder Scrolls, etc.
Looking at the Dungeon Master article, I see that it is billed as the first 3D realtime action computer role-playing game, which sounds more correct. Perhaps the phrasing in this article should be updated to be consistent with that.
HunterZ (talk) 01:25, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "first 3d computer role-playing game" 

message: http://www.rpgwatch.com/forums/showthread.php?t=19360 Twobells (talk) 11:25, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  2013 Remake
Talk:RoboCop Versus The Terminator

message: The notability of the basic material seems inheret - however, I think it could be easily merged with the comic book series into one article.  Note that "Alien vs. Predator" franchise has an entire page dedicated to the overarching concept and where it is used.  A section for video games using the Robocop vs. Terminator theme could easily be established in the comic article, or the comic could be brought here... bottom line, I'd merge. --Bishop2 (talk) 14:35, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability & Possible Merge

message: I own the Master System version. Why isn't there a mention of it? Sierraoffline444 (talk) 21:35, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Master System version? 

message: The Genesis version being critically considered the superior version and all, giving mention to it in the Review section might be in order. Alialiac (talk) 14:13, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mention of the Sega Genesis version in Review would be appropriate 

message: Are the various versions of RoboCop Versus The Terminator the same game (ports) or not (reformulated games)? Which ones are considered ports and which ones aren't? 2605:E000:121D:8BF5:B9D9:31CB:F07B:28F1 (talk) 01:20, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two questions about the game
Talk:Romancing SaGa 2

message: I'm just curious about the character names listed in the article.  As far as I know this game was never released outside Japan and there was no official translation made, so where do these name translations come from?  Some of the names seem rather awkward.  As far as I know most of these names, unlike many fantasy games, were based on actual words in English/French/German/etc. If these are not "confirmed" names, I consider changing them to more conventional transliteration.  o (talk) 05:35, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name translations 

message: The closest thing to official in terms of translated names for the seven heroes comes from Square Enix's game Guardian Cross, and are as follows: Noel, Rockbouquet, Wagnus, Danntag, Kugenecie, Souvie, and Boqon. 121.1.11.34 (talk) 03:38, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seven Heroes' names
Talk:Alexander Turner

message: Put it this way, wikipedia is free, if I think i deserve to be in it I think i should. Honestly, i feel sorry for the moderators who spend their life, working hours for abolutly nothing. Well, at the age of 12 i made my first million, need proof, i could give you my bank details. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 125.193.32.109 (talk • contribs).
:If you think Wikipedia is free, I'm sure you're happy to cover the operating costs. Good use of that million. And if nobody else thinks you should be in it, perhaps they know something you don't? --Alvestrand 00:12, 18 August 2006 (UTC)