Talk:Strepsiptera

message: Aren't they parasites rather than parasitoids? I'm pretty sure they don't typically kill their host. --152.1.172.167 17:54, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for pointing out. Resh, V. H. & R. T. Cardé (Editors) 2003. Encyclopedia of Insects. Academic Press. notes that
and
So the correction is made. Shyamal 13:29, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Parasite vs Parasitoid

message: The article states strepsiptera are "obligate" and "endoparasitic". I'm under the impression obligate parasites cannot live outside their host' body, yet strepsiptera routinely live outside the host as both larvae and adults. Ditto "endoparasites." (In any case, is not "obligate endoparasite" redundant?
Compounding the errors is the (hyperlinked) phrase "on other insects" which link leads to "Entomophagous parasite", yet another type of parasite. That article is riddled with errors and contradictions as well. I'm not an expert, and I guess we need one.Nickrz (talk) 00:10, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: "Obligate" is usually used in the sense of being the opposite of "opportunistic" (or facultative). Endoparasites, including those of humans routinely spend a part of their life cycle outside their hosts - eggs and larvae of tapeworms for instance. Shyamal (talk) 02:44, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Have read some of the sources and rewritten some parts. Shyamal (talk) 07:37, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction 

message: Mention if they have a common name, or mention the lack thereof. Jidanni (talk) 03:10, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Common name

message: *Xenos → Xenos (graphics chip)
*Xenos (Greek) → Xenos
See Talk:Xenos#Requested move.  --Una Smith (talk) 19:26, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notice of requested move 

message: I removed this phrase "(which lack trochanters)" from the article. The wikilink takes me to an article on vertebrate (human) thigh bones. Obviously this in not the meaning wanted here. Could someone who knows what the insect "trochanter" is fix this with the correct link?
Nick Beeson (talk) 22:12, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: There is some information at arthropod leg. Shyamal (talk) 02:02, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Trochanter

message: A paper in 2009 studied 6 genes and found (according to them) strong evidence that the Strepsiptera are in fact sister to Coleoptera. The paper is:
Wiegmann, B. M., Trautwein, M. D., Kim, J.-W., Cassel, B. K., Bertone, M. a, Winterton, S. L., & Yeates, D. K. (2009). Single-copy nuclear genes resolve the phylogeny of the holometabolous insects. BMC biology, 7, 34. doi:10.1186/1741-7007-7-34
Another paper in 2009 looking at this problem found that either the Strepsiptera are derived within beetles, or that the Strepsiptera are sister to Coleoptera + Neuroptera (this paper is open access):
McKenna, D. D., & Farrell, B. D. (2010). 9-genes reinforce the phylogeny of holometabola and yield alternate views on the phylogenetic placement of Strepsiptera. PloS one, 5(7), e11887. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0011887
Any comment on this? I'm thinking a small rewrite of the classification section is in order to reflect this. Quinzer (talk) 18:09, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Go for it! Shyamal (talk) 08:36, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  New molecular evidence places Strepsiptera sister, within, or at least closely related to beetles 

message: I've added an image of a male Strepsiptera with a close up of the eyes. I'm going to get the permission of the grad student who took the picture. Chonaron (talk) 18:17, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strepsiptera male picture 

message: Substituted at 20:15, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment