Talk:Haze (video game)

message: Knives are throwable in this game.  I've seen developer videos on YouTube showing demonstrations of it.  Please don't modify the article by removing my edit.  ElSpec774 13:35, 16, March 2008 (UTC)
:YouTube isn't a reliable source, but I was reverting because you basically just capitalised a few words, and introduced throwing without a source. Source it, and it's fine. Fin©™ 17:40, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weapons 

message: Ubisoft has revealed that the PS3 is the lead development platform for Haze, should this be noted. Miseryrevived 20:49, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead Platform 

message: Did the developer already talk about the way this game can be played.  A PS3 does also have support for a USB mouse and keyboard.  It is up to the developer to use or not use them in their games.  Is anything known about it for this game? --Stef Nighthawk 14:51, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Input 

message: Who the hell wrote that the PC and 360 versions have been cancelled? They have been indefinitely postponed, but nowhere does Ubisoft explicitly say it's not gonna happen.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.194.46.6 (talk) 15:55, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The article indicates that the 360 version is no longer being developed...? Im gonna take that out since i cant find a source for that that i can read, can someone explain what the curent reference says? Everywhere online seems to say timed-exclusive John.n-irl 12:17, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

text: Thanks 4 that, i wasnt disputing it because it was in german, just couldnt read it and it was the only source i could see(never thought of the logos and such). John.n-irl 15:10, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Exclusivity 

message: based on a bit-tech interview iv taken the engine name out, for now ill put 'untitled - inhouse'. Anyone think of something better? Its definetly not Haze Engine(although i like mega-engine..ha) John.n-irl 09:48, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Engine 

message: Would anyone object to a rewording of the first paragraph, to remove the 360 and PC references and keep them in the development section? It would seem like the best idea since there is no versions in development and it would stop the constant rewording of the paragraph? It also seems a little odd to have in the opening John.n-irl 09:39, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  360 and PC 

message: Mantel and Nectar aren't in all capitals. Nectar isn't an abbreviation of nova-keta-thyrazine  —Preceding unsigned comment added by MantelKnight (talk • contribs) 06:35, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammar Notes 

message: Couple of recent interviews on Gamasutra, which at some point it might be useful to reference somewhere in the article.
*Writer Rob Yescombe (22nd October)
*Project lead Derek Littlewood (2nd November)
--Nick RTalk 17:31, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Useful articles to reference 

message: the game is coming out December 4th. this is my proof: http://www.us.playstation.com/PS3/Games.
maybe someone should change it? or should it just be left as is?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.65.48.142 (talk) 00:46, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, that website says nothing more specific than "2008". --Nick RTalk 11:49, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Release date

message: Haze will run not under 720p. It´s resolution will be 576 p!
This should be mentioned in the article
--Deficiency (talk) 07:04, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: What? Isn´t there a rule that all games need to run at atleast 720p on the PS3? And why would they need to run an ugly ass game like Haze at a lower resolution anyways?--Threedots dead (talk) 11:26, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Don´t know why, but it´s true. And there is no rule for 720p --> Look GTA IV it has native resolution of 640p and will be scaled up to 720p! And yes it´s an ugly ass game :-) --Deficiency (talk) 13:58, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  No HD! 

message: Isn't this game more known for it's poor score than good score in Famitsu? Why the good scores first? 86.148.237.7 (talk) 10:57, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: FHM could offer a different perspective on Haze to a different target audience, rather than the usual "gaming press" JayKeaton (talk) 16:00, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I belive they(or possibly maxim, apols if I am wrong), are on record(somewhere) as saying they reviewed a game without seeing or playing it. John.n-IRL 11:42, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: FHM is not a respected review in this industry like Gamespot, Gametrailers etc. Therefore, they should not be included. Moccamonster Talk 16:13, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception 

message: FHM gives all shooters high scores, they are a horrible review site and not included in Meta Critic nor Gameranking meta scoring because they are not reputable.
Their score is ridiculous and far out of band for the game, it should be removed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.178.97.83 (talk) 19:33, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: FHM could offer a different perspective on Haze to a different target audience, rather than the usual "gaming press" JayKeaton (talk) 16:00, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I belive they(or possibly maxim, apols if I am wrong), are on record(somewhere) as saying they reviewed a game without seeing or playing it. John.n-IRL 11:42, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: FHM is not a respected review in this industry like Gamespot, Gametrailers etc. Therefore, they should not be included. Moccamonster Talk 16:13, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Including FHM score? 

message: Noticing a revert war starting regarding the Weapons section, so both editors involved should ask themselves (and each other) this question: Are the weapons notable?  (See WP:VG/GL for the established consensus on this issue.)
My take on it is that there isn't anything particularly notable about the weapons in this game, such that they need to be listed in their own section.  Also, gaming blogs are generally not considered reliable sources. — KieferSkunk (talk) — 20:16, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yup, I came to the same conclusion once I read over the section, it was basically "there's a pistol. and a rifle. and a minigun." - I said as much on Skywalker's talk page. Fin©™ 20:27, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are the weapons notable? 

message: Please join our project to upgrade this article to featured status.
</div>
== box art ==
is it just me or does the box art's eye's size and position not make any sense?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by TMV943 (talk • contribs) 04:48, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Help improve our long-awaited [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Crytek UK|Wikiproject]]!

message: is it just me or does the box art's eye's size and position not make any sense?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by TMV943 (talk • contribs) 04:48, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  box art 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Haze (video game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080303001520/http://forums.ubi.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/7551024144/m/9341061436 to http://forums.ubi.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/7551024144/m/9341061436
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081026113858/http://www.ugo.com/games/halo-3-killers/?cur=haze to http://www.ugo.com/games/halo-3-killers/?cur=haze
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:45, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified