Talk:Female sperm

message: I believe this article is somewhat extending its scope beyond what it should be at. I believe parts of it should be merged into the LGBT reproduction article to keep the scope limited to discussing female sperm, more like the Male egg article SiliconProphet (talk) 14:18, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Scope of the article

message: The Y chromosome is needed to make functioning sperm at all, that is, sperm with normal maturation levels that yields life (both female and male ) without epigenetic disease, that is, that will be born with severe health problems or suffer from premature aging. But in female development in the womb, the Y chromosome in the testes formation are somehow suppressed yielding females instead of males. There is no idea why this happens, but Y is required for fecundation and therefore conception.
Gogoboi 20:55, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Y not needed for conception?

message: There seems to have been some dispute a while back if female sperm could be used for artificial insemination, I'd just like to point out that a Y chromosome is not at all neccesary for conception, all human females on Earth have been concieved from sperm without a Y chromosome, the sperm contains an X chromosome just as a "female sperm" would. Also there were claims that none of the sources brought up the possiblity of female sperm being used this way but I skimmed through them and that simply wasnt true. I'm surprised no one caught this for so long. Velps 19:24, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Erm...

message: the link to  independent.co.uk  results in a 404 error  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.224.55.168 (talk) 08:19, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  link dead 

message: I somewhat rewrote the first sentence.
The article, before this rewrite, first defined the term as normal sperm with an X-chromosome, then threw the definition away in favor of another one (sperm endowed with genetic material from a female) which it discussed for the rest of the article. Since no more mention of natural X-chromosome sperm was made, I changed the lead to be somewhat less confusing. Jsharpminor (talk) 00:46, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intro section. 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Female sperm. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131109045059/http://www.ncl.ac.uk/press.office/press.release/item/1176449611 to http://www.ncl.ac.uk/press.office/press.release/item/1176449611
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:44, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Guys this article is full of tons of original research. 
A make is an organism that produces sperm while female is an organism that produces ovum.
Some of these sources aren’t saying what y’all think they are saying.
Also I’m not confident some of these sources are reliable. CycoMa (talk) 20:35, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Is the original research still present? MaitreyaVaruna (talk) 17:52, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original research