lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Stereology

message: I noticed that these 2 web sites had been removed from the links section.  
The Stereology Information Center web site has a message that says that they were down for a while, but they're back up now.  So, I'm adding them back in.
The MBF Bioscience page points to a stereology-related web site, and it looks like it was removed by someone who has a competing product, so I'm adding it back in.
Thanks!
20:00, 10 July 2007 209.198.74.66  This history entry is an IP belonging to MBF at 8PM deleting a competing link. This is the second time this has been done by MBF.
PaddBear is obviously Steve Arrants at MBF and should be careful of any allegations they make.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.175.154.212 (talk) 18:49, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20150228042532/http://stereologysociety.org/about.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Sam-2727 (talk) 04:00, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Kinzua Bridge State Park

message: Would anyone care if I created a main article for the Kinzua Bridge? --​​​​D​​tbohrer​​​​talk•contribs 00:01, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That would be great! Go for it. Dincher 00:07, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Which is better for the title: "Kinzua Bridge" or "Kinzua Viaduct". --​​​​D​​tbohrer​​​​talk•contribs 00:18, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I would go with Kinzua Bridge as the main name and make Kinzua Viaduct a redirect. Dincher 00:19, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kinzua Bridge 

message: I uploaded four pre-destruction shots I had from 2001 at Commons. They are in Category:Kinzua Bridge. IvoShandor 05:15, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Photos
Talk:Oil Creek State Park

message: The first oilwell in North America, let alone the World, was drilled in Oils Springs Ontario.
In 1858 it became the first oil well in North America, remembered as Williams No.1 at Oil Springs, Ontario. (This was a year before Edwin Drake drilled his famous wildcat in Pennsylvania in 1859.) 
68.145.52.154 20:00, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: First oilwell?
Wikipedia talk:Qualified adminship voting

message: OK, here's some details about the proposal. For some background, read Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship. Well, here is the motivation behind this proposal.
*Problem: many users feel that the standards at WP:RFA are excessively high, and that some reasons given for votes are excessive
*Solution: reduce the threshold for promotion (slightly, from 80% to 70%), discount votes based on frivolous criteria such as edit counts etc., and require any accusations to be supported by at least one diff.
*Problems found in other solutions:
**Needlessly complex process
**Unfair difficulty of making legitimate oppose votes
**Extend the length of RFA to an unmanageable level
Anyway, that's my take on it. Cynical 18:45, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

message: *This takes away a reason to contribute.  If we have set criteria, then it is the criteria speaking (which some may not agree with), not the voters. Michael 15:45, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: The problem with this proposal is that it's treating symptoms, rather than causes. You want people to stop voting on editcountitis reasons, but all this proposal can do is stop people from mentioning that. If you strike votes that say "not enough talkspace edits", people will simply start voting "oppose" without giving a reason, or say "oppose per <some other guy>". >Radiant< 23:00, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why this won't work
Talk:Shawnee State Park (Pennsylvania)

message: The above quotation was removed from the article. It is unsourced, but does not appear to be vandalism. It appeared in the original article  an article written by an unregistered user. If any can provide a source for this information which is certainly interesting and relevant I think it would be useful to place it back in the article. Dincher 04:33, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I received an email from the park ranger at Shawnee State Park and she state that she has worked at Shawnee for ten years and has never heard of Shawn Dincher 00:04, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Shawn the Lake Monster
Talk:RED Music

message: How can it be independent if it's owned by Sony BMG? - Quirk 18:49, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: For Real Yah heard! Slav-E-Ana Jones (talk) 02:53, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yo this slav-e-ana Jones from Cleveland hmu 2166829785
Talk:White Clay Creek Preserve

message: I reverted an edit that said the Mason-Dixon line was only between MD and PA (dropping DE), then referred to it as an arc through the park (which is the border between DE and PA). It may be possible to improve the wording of this section of the article, but that edit was not it. Ruhrfisch 01:07, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mason-Dixon Line
Talk:Invasion of the Neptune Men

message: Even on MST3K this movie seemed to slow down the fabric of space time, by using the same footage over and over for fights/action sequences (which if I recall is also pointed out by the crew) it gave the impression of being three hours long. I don't doubt the article's stated 82 minutes, but am wondering if it is known how many minutes of original footage were actually in the movie? (To rephrase, how long would the movie be if the repeated sequences were removed?) Anynobody 03:45, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  < 82 minutes of footage for 82 min release 

message: The article implies that the destruction of the infamous "Hitler building" is real-life WW2 stock footage. This trivia fact pops up on the IMDB, and is widely repeated on the internet; it is alluded to on this page at MST3KInfo, but in this case it seems nonsensical. The footage is clearly that of a miniature model building being blown up from inside, shot from two different camera angles. At the very least, it seems strange that news cameras in the midst of a real bombing raid would be trained on the building at the exact moment it is blown up. Can anyone, perhaps a Japanese reader, shed any light on this? Why does the film have a "Hitler building", and what do the Japanese characters above it say? -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 12:51, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks - so it's probably the Japanese translation of Mein Kampf. If only there was a real Japanese person on Wikipedia - he might be able to shed some light on this. A shufty on Google suggests that The Final War hasn't been released on a home video format, but was released the cinemas (e.g. this google book search). And it was dead serious. Here's a little article in Life Magazine about the building of a miniature Golden Gate bridge for the film. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 18:05, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Hitler Building 

message: Cast should add new heading.It's good explain for this article. also add movie's image file.Please don't revert that.It's very important information for this movie.--こういぇはつ (talk) 01:30, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important information
Talk:Foreign relations of Belgium

message: There is now a upstart WikiProject to establish a concensus about WP's International bilateral relations articles, including "X-Y (country) relations" articles, at Wikipedia:Centralized discussion/Bilateral international relations. Interested parties should add their names at Wikipedia:WikiProject International relations/Bilateral relations task force if they wish to play a part in the discussions or have an Interest in this going forward. Thank you for your attention.
CaribDigita (talk) 00:03, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed WikiProject - Bilateral relations 

message: I cannot find proof of this  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:A601:A2A0:10FD:466:286B:94A2:5505 (talk) 00:54, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  No source for EU Headquarters 

message: The island of Formosa is not on the map, even if Belgium does not have diplomatic relations with Taiwan, the island of Formosa should atleast be presented. 2A02:1811:B63B:900:94F5:D160:DF76:6F00 (talk) 18:30, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formosa
Talk:Marshalite

message: The appropriate page in dewiki would be "Heuerampel" but I am somehow unable to add the link. Maybe one of you knows how to do this ? --Mbs z (talk) 00:30, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interwiki-Link to German article ? 

message: *  - Photo:Another of Australia's industrial regiments — the staff and employes of Charles Marshall Pty. Ltd., Brunswick-street, Fitzroy, engraver. (Includes Charles Marshall amony his employees - front center near guy with hat I believe )
*  - Two elderly daughters of the late Charles Marshall, inventor of the clock-face traffic light, sought rectification of the register of Charles Marshall Pty. Ltd.
* Charles Marshall Memorial Trophy Victorian Collections   (Royal_Melbourne_Yacht_Squadron) charles_marshall_memorial_trophy.pdf
DoverPawn (talk) 23:03, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: References to be added
Talk:Histoire de Mr. Vieux Bois

message: It might be good to have a publication history section, mentioning the pirated French versions and the American edition.  The methods used for text and image reproduction at the time may also be relevant.  This page from Andy Beck (his site is already in external links) compares several versions and their history.  John Adcock's comments on the book suggest that the "gypsography" mentioned on the cover of the American edition is a satirical term for stereotyping.  He also mentions where the names "Obadiah" and "Oldbuck" might have come from.
I'm just hesitant about making any major changes since I'm new and I don't know if these sources would be considered reliable, though their authors seem knowledgeable.  Xylemphone (talk) 16:03, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Publication history
Talk:Naturalistic observation

message: I think they are essentially about the same thing. Kindergarten ped (talk) 17:08, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind. They are clearly different topics, but maybe we could incorporate the things in observation that is relevant to this article... Kindergarten ped (talk) 13:01, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge [[observation]] into this article?
Talk:Digit (magazine)

message: The claim that it is a best-selling magazine with a readership of over 600,000 is its source of notability, but no independent and reliable source is given for this figure.  Saligron 15:43, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: One or more people has been removing the  tag without explanation and without adding independent sources.  If this is just one person doing this, then please stop your avoidant vandalism.  Otherwise, to the next person who wants to remove tag, please explain your reason why you think the tag does not apply. Saligron 06:55, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source for notability 

message: Wikiga, could you please provide some background as to why you keep adding redirects from Chip-india to this article?  All this is causing us to do is have an Edit war, which is a bad thing.  So help me out here, please? --SilverhandTalk 17:22, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikiga and others have been blocked indefinitely for these instances of vandalism (they also redirected CHIP (magazine) here). Please file a report at WP:AIV if you see more users redirecting competing magazine's pages to here. Kusma (討論) 18:11, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirects from [[Chip-india]] 
Talk:Radio One (India)

message: In my opinion, if the most attractive radio brand 2017 ranking is to be mentioned at all, it needs to be noted that only two radio brands were listed, in order to not be misleading. Perhaps the #531 rank among all brands could be mentioned in addition. --Pipetricker (talk) 13:51, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  India's most attractive radio brand out of two, and #531 of all brands (2017)
Talk:Win 94.6 FM

message: Two citations have been added to the page, confirming the radio station's termination due to licensing fee disagreements. Mcconnellsc58 (talk) 18:12, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations

message: JoeNMLC (talk) 20:08, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Orphan article message
Talk:Sun TV (India)

message: The section on the serials on SUN TV seem to be poorly written. 
I also feel that each of the serials could have their own page instead of their plot summaries appearing on this page.
Vellayappan 06:31, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Serials 

message: I am making a merge proposal on Aarti Rao Sun TV Extortion Scandal. I am tagging this page so that this suggestion can be discussed and closed by the editors. Shashank Tulsyan (talk) 02:46, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I have temporarily reverted the proposal till the existing one is clarified. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 03:02, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from [[Aarti Rao Sun TV Extortion Scandal]] 

message: 2607:FEA8:2D20:14B5:A1F2:2BC8:6899:F3F2 (talk) 17:28, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Majavah (t/c) 17:52, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 6 January 2020
Talk:Maharashtra Times

message: ::hello sir,
:::i want to know that what is the name of Maharashtra Times in the year of 1837? can you plz tell me?
you can inform me on tambe_deepika@yahoo.co.in —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 59.183.55.169 (talk) 14:36, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  qu[es]tion
Talk:Cueva de los Tayos/Archive 1

message: A hoax from User:Ethicalhacker and IP User:67.113.48.197 ? Are they the same? Should this be deleted? --Wetman 19:13, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This article has shaped up excellently. I owe you all thanks and withdraw my skepticism. --Wetman 08:46, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The various myths about this cave were definitively debunked by the very expedition quoted in some of the "supporting" websites - the 1976 British expedition.  The cave does exist, Neil Armstrong was actually there, but the exotic claims of a metallic library, altars, artificial tunnels etc were completely disproved.  See Red Rose Cave and Pothole Club Journal No 7 (1977) or Caving International No 1 (1978). This article needs to be rewritten on a more factual basis, making clear which are the facts and which are the myths. Right now it is difficult to tell. Ian mckenzie 00:26, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Hoax - Yes, and No

message: Thanks for bringing disputed statements to light.  If anyone is intersted in sorting out fact from fiction and has conclusive evidence that can be referenced, I welcome any edits that shift debunked statements in the main body of this article into a subcategory of the Lore section, hopefully with a clear explaination how the controversy arose, etc...  Thanks again.  --67.113.49.74 16:27, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revisions Welcomed 

message: I have reorganized the Redirects so that this cave appears under its proper name, Cueva de los Tayos. Ian mckenzie 21:41, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relocation
Talk:Mario Kart Arcade GP 2

message: I say any unverified claim of Princess Daisy being in the game should be reverted on sight as pure vandalism, exempt from 3RR based on the evidence here. Any objections? Dancter 14:41, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disputed 

message: Is this section really needed? It's not very accurate. For instance, there is a Chuck E. Cheese near my house that has it, and it's only $0.25 to play..
74.36.119.65 (talk) 05:28, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Cost, and where to play"?
Talk:Dina Thanthi

message: why can't this title be changed to "Daily Thanthi" as it is their official name? --Neechalkaran (talk) 05:31, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Daily Thanthi
Talk:Dinamani

message: erererererrerererererer  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 223.196.32.102 (talk) 16:07, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I went here in an attempt to verify the contents of the article. Performing a search inside the book yields no results for "Dinamani". Perhaps I'm missing something? Waggie (talk) 16:12, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not in citation given
Talk:Dinamalar

message: How did dinamalar.com attract 202,000 visitors when dailythanthi.com (the market leader offline) could manage only 21,000 visitors in 2008?Anwar (talk) 11:58, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Dinamalar overtakes Dinathanthi

message: , the source you've got this time is pretty good, but it doesn't state anything about the motives for their publication of the cartoons. Please demonstrate some reliable sources that claim Dinmalar unequivocally published cartoons of Muhammad for reasons of provocation. 
Furthermore, please read WP:SAWW. The term "Islamic prophet" is to be used once per article. Please refrain from reinserting it multiple times. Dolescum (talk) 17:15, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsourced editorializing in article
Talk:The Tribune (India)

message: Note:  Project Banner with Chandigarh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Chandigarh or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 06:05, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Chandigarh workgroup Addition 

message: AAG parveen bhadu is a Rapist 86.20.139.25 (talk) 10:38, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Voice for justice 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved. This one seems to be unanimous and uncontroversial. I'm going to also make a new proposal for PTOPIC though... watch this space.   — Amakuru (talk) 10:36, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The Tribune (Chandigarh) →  – The Tribune (Chandigarh) should move to its own redirect The Tribune (India) which is actual name for this newspaper. Even their website is tribuneindia.com. ❯❯❯   Chunky aka Al Kashmiri  (✍️) 03:10, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

text: @TheChunky - Support per nom. MaplesyrupSushi (talk) 14:12, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 4 September 2023
Talk:ET Chandigarh

message: Note:  Project Banner with Chandigarh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Chandigarh or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 06:03, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Chandigarh workgroup Addition
Talk:Oregon's 4th congressional district

message: A wiki vandal using address 152.131.10.79 falsely edited this page to erase wins by John Kerry and Hillary Clinton in this district.  I am sad to report this address is owned by the Department of Veterans Affairs. Huangdi (talk) 06:34, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shame on you, vandal 

message: Hey there wikipedians (is that the right term?  Sorry - I don't get into the community much).  The Oregon district maps have changes, and I think most of these pages need to be updated.  I'll try and get to it... eventually?  When work allows?  Anyway, I just wanted to drop the link to the source for the new maps in case someone else gets a chance to make these changes before I do. Zombi.Don (talk) 17:49, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updated Maps
Talk:Oregon's 5th congressional district

message: Don't know if it belongs in the article or not... 
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/05/23/978400/-Daily-Kos-Elections-Morning-Digest:-5-23
Naraht (talk) 17:38, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Every office holder in OR-5 divorced while in Office 

message: I added the 2012 election results but need some help formatting for the Constitution Party.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.252.198.52 (talk) 17:35, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. The Oregon Constitution Party is separate from the national party as of 2006. --Esprqii (talk) 18:01, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formatting help 
Talk:Kairali TV

message: Many of the "non-inline-citation" references may be redundant or were used to back up material that has since been removed.
These should either be deleted, or if they are appropriate to use as external links, moved to that section.  Please read WP:External links before moving anything to that section.  davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 21:40, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are all of the references really references? 

message: Wikipedia is not a directory of indiscriminate information.
If you have a show that you know would qualify for an article in Wikipedia which has no article, or one that is provably "popular" (typically shown by very high sustained viewership or very high viewership if it is a single-episode program) be sure to include a reliable source demonstrating this fact.
If the show already has a page or if it notable enough to have its own page and you create one, be sure there is support on that page for the show's notability.
A previous edit with the shows that I removed can be found in the "old" version of this diff.
By the way, be sure to double-check before wikilinking to existing articles - the page you are linking to may be about another topic altogether (e.g. Karyam Nissaram is about a 1983 film, not the modern television show), or it may be a redirect link back to this page, like .  Such links should not be added as links but if a reliable source demonstrates that these shows are notable or popular, they can be added without being Wiki-linked.  davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 20:09, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Programming section 

message: Dear folks,
If you include movie lists that aren't necessary, you'll have to clarify how they relates to this channel. Otherwise, it would be considered as disruptive editing see also  WP:NOTCATALOG.Thanks-- Padavalam🌂  ►  07:50, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  ‎List of Movies 

message: This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (your reason here) --59.92.200.107 (talk) 13:41, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contested deletion