Talk:Boeing X-20 Dyna-Soar

message: It seems like a pretty obvious pun to me, but I don't see it mentioned anywhere. Is it intended?— Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.1.229.206 (talk) 11:23, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dyna-soar = Dinosaur. Pun intended? 

message: Article references German scientists brought to the US by the CIA under Operation Paperclip. It says this was after World War 1, but the Operation Paperclip article says it was after WW2. Fix maybe?— Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.118.195.198 (talk) 08:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The CIA reference is slightly off base -- the CIA was established in 1947, PAPERCLIP was in 1945:46.  The  OSS, the CIA's predecessor, may have been involved in the PAPERCLIP program but that's unclear, the references I've seen suggest it was an Army effort.  MrG 65.102.202.14 (talk) 21:23, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Operation Paperclip error? 

message: Third part: "After the equipment bay". It should be "Behind the equipment bay" or am I wrong?
--DrJos (talk) 12:30, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Description 

message: maybe I will leave one at the bottom but not three at the top. 72.0.187.239 (talk) 19:55, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't, or you will be reverted. OR does not apply to images. - BillCJ (talk) 20:00, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: fine but its bad MOS so removed on those grounds lol BillCJ better luck next time. 72.0.187.239 (talk) 05:14, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The Development section is so much more appropriate for a location of the small monochrome NASA mockup photo. Bill's version works. Binksternet (talk) 07:09, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: yes agreed it was low-res. I will try the high res schematic this time. we do need to emphasize first-hand info when possible though, even in pics. 72.0.187.239 (talk) 20:35, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that first-hand info can be a good emphasis. If there's very little available, then artist's renderings are suitable, especially ones that were contemporary. Binksternet (talk) 00:38, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: CGI Pics are OR and I'm deleting

message: Anyone know if the X-20 has any relation to the SR-91 Aurora project? From reading about both they seem to be very similar.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.177.80.3 (talk) 20:22, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  SR-91: Aurora Relation 

message: SpaceShipTwo clearly is not similar to the X-20. The X-20 is an orbital spacecraft, SpaceShipTwo isn't and can never be. Even if you launched it from a rocket (as the X-20 was designed for) the very lightweight construction would simply not survive the rigours of orbital launch, flight and re-entry. Therefore I am removing the link. GrampaScience (talk) 19:45, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  SpaceShipTwo 

message: The reference in the Legacy section to Buran being smaller than Dyna-Soar seems questionable. Is it meant to say "larger" rather than "smaller", or "Clipper" instead of "Buran"?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alex.K.NY (talk • contribs) 02:00, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legacy 

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests October 2011 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 19:38, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Dyna-Soar.jpg Nominated for Deletion

message: What hardware was actually built (hard to tell from the article) ? Something was rolled out in 1962 - was it a mockup, construction pathfinder, drop test article or what ? What else built ? What done with what built ? - Rod57 (talk) 23:59, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  What hardware was actually built