Talk:Hobart

message: Greetings,
I have restructured the article a bit to bring it closer to the style used on the Sydney page.
Main reason is that I want to add a section on healthcare, but adding yet another major section of r a few lines of text seems weird. I believe that the page looks better with the new grouping now, and this style is also used for other Australian cities like Sydney.
But feel free to disagree, I'm relatively new here on Wikipedia and not sure how much I may change without asking for consensus.
LordPeterII (talk) 14:40, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Restructured Infrastructure section, added Health section

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Hobart Function & Conference Centre and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 25#Hobart Function & Conference Centre until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  A7V2 (talk) 07:10, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Hobart Function & Conference Centre" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: Starting section so that editors who wish to do so may present arguments for altering the WP:STATUSQUO in the article, specifically, removing the alternative name from the first sentence. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 02:29, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: this is already being discussed in the "Hobart Name" Section 131.217.255.240 (talk) 02:59, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, but without you, because I'm blocking you for edit warring. Drmies (talk) 03:15, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: you might want to block yourself for the same thing. I suggest providing arguments for the inclusion of information, particularly when consensus has not been reached, before engaging in edit warring. 202.168.17.102 (talk) 04:14, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you sure you are not the same person as the IP I just blocked? Drmies (talk) 02:23, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

text: @202.168.17.102: Says the one who started this whole shemozzle across multiple articles, has been switching IPs as fast as possible, and has now created a sockpuppet to evade a block. We were not born yesterday, and can tell very easily that all these "people" who are "supporting" you, are actually you switching IPs and making socks. Even considering every IP you've used as a single person, the number of users reverting you is still higher than the number "supporting" you (i.e. you and your socks). Yes, I am saying this directly, because the WP:AGF ran out a while ago. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 06:38, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Mako001, are you saying there is an account now? Drmies (talk) 16:18, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Drmies: seemed to find this page in a manner that can only be described as an improbable coincidence. Their other edits consist of minor copyediting, followed by suddenly showing up here to support the IP. Note that in addition to the improbable coincidence, both fail to capitalise "Simulaun", and both start their replies with lowercase letters. I wasn't going to bother with SPI, since I figured that dropping the hint that it wasn't fooling anyone would be enough to put a stop to it. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 23:14, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indigenous names