lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Crystal, Gunnison County, Colorado

message: It would be good to have a photo of the town itself, not just the famous mill. Ntsimp (talk) 02:52, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

message: "There are books available on Crystal by one of its few residents."
If this place still has a few residents, can it truly be a ghost town?  I guess it's a fine line, but I wonder.  Perhaps there should be some clarification as to how many residents the place actually has. Paul 01:48, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ghost town? 

message: No road providing access to Crystal was ever a Colorado State Highway -- I think someone was just misreading the maps.  These are county roads at best. Paul 01:50, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roads 

message: Note that this was never a hydroelectric operation.  Hydropower was used in order to compress air, which in turn was used for pneumatic power tools.  See Crystal Mill.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.71.67.2 (talk) 18:02, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NOT a hydroelectric plant 

message: This would be an interesting addition to the history section of the article:  did the electricity "grid" ever reach the town of Crystal?  Do the remaining buildings currently have electric power?  If not, when was the town "cut off from the grid"? 174.24.108.81 (talk) 17:03, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Electric power in Crystal 

message: I am interested in adding information regarding the physical traits of the Crystal Colorado area. Vegetation, geography, topography etc. Crystal is remarkable because of these aspects and a lot of research has been done throughout the area regarding these subjects. The best source I could find with lots of useful scientific data is from https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=7103&context=aspen_bib - this was written in the 1960's so if anybody has some more updated and relevant info regarding these concepts that would be awesome!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Agould614 (talk • contribs) 05:49, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Physiological / Geography
Talk:Cheech & Chong's The Corsican Brothers

message: someone may want to touch it up. Thanks.--Iamstillhiro1112 15:50, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  I added a plotline 

message: Saying that "many of the duo's fans" regard the film as "vastly inferior" to Cheech and Chong's earlier films is pure opinion. Someone who's invested in this article should find and actual reviewer who states this. Then that reviewer's opinion can be included. ask123 (talk) 04:32, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opinions
Talk:Third from the Sun

message: ***No explanation is given as to how a planet could be ' 11 million miles away '. Even the closest approach to Earth from Mars is 34M miles (2003), and asteroids are even further away, between Mars & Jupiter. ***
They're from a different planet, they're miles are different from ours. Is that so hard?
:Yeah, except it would have been just as easy for the writers to say "25 trillion miles" or some other more realistic number... It's hard to think of a justification for why they would choose "11 million" over that.
::Obviously their definition of a mile is different to ours... Lugnuts 16:45, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: 11.18 million miles is the speed of light per minute.  Perhaps...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cosumel (talk • contribs) 18:11, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: 11 million miles

message: How is it that they went to earth? I know it's a dumb question, & I know that this doesn't have anything else to do with the article, but I mean, were these people from another planet or something?Jpmcruiser (talk) 01:59, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Just a Quick Question
Talk:Gerstenhaber algebra

message: I think that the version of JI in this article was wrong. I've checked Kossman-Schwarzbach, Odd and even Poisson brackets (2000) and Mackenzie and Xu on Schouten bracket  (JI reads different, but they're equivalent)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.132.104.71 (talk) 10:43, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Graded Jacobi identity 

message: A differential is not required in the definition of a Gerstenhaber algebra.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.114.129.14 (talk) 14:23, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed in the past, I guess. In the current version of the article, it does not say this anywhere. 67.198.37.16 (talk) 19:57, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  It is not DIFFERENTIAL graded
Talk:High Speed Photometer

message: Did HSP do the scheduled observations (or more), and how much were they affected or compromised by the uncorrected main mirror ? - Rod57 (talk) 14:47, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The Bless ref in further reading says "The ability of HSP to carry out its primary program, however, was nearly totally compromised by the poor performance of the telescope, i.e., the spherical aberration of the primary mirror that greatly amplified the effects of large spacecraft pointing jitter and telescope "breathing." As a consequence, the real possibility of HST/HSP opening a new era of astronomical photometry was lost. " and that HSP was affected more than the other instruments. - Rod57 (talk) 15:05, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  How much was HSP affected by the uncorrected main mirror
Talk:Gore Range

message: The link for Lord St. George Gore leads to who I presume is an 18th century ancestor. I can find no more info about him on Wikipedia, but he is a notable person who definitely needs an article here. 
https://billingsgazette.com/news/features/outdoors/expedition-of-excess/article_fe245dc0-67e6-5689-ae80-d451696472ce.html
https://www.coloradohistoricnewspapers.org/cgi-bin/colorado?a=d&d=STP19640730.2.147&e=-------en-20--1--img-txIN%7ctxCO%7ctxTA--------0------Flight Risk (talk) 20:42, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:   Lord St. George Gore 

message: The reservoir trail can be covered in the scope of the range. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 23:12, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Robertjamal12 ~🔔 17:17, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Green Mountain Reservoir Trail]] into [[Gore Range]] 

message: There is a documentary about the buffalo by Ken Burns that mentions this jerk Victor Grigas (talk) 00:24, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lord gore in Documentary
Talk:Stonewall Jackson Lake State Park

message: On 2008-03-27, this article was renamed to Stonewall Jackson Lake State Park (from Stonewall Jackson Resort State Park) following a discussion by users WVhybrid and bmpowell.  This name is the park's original name and continues to be its legal name. 
After the resort lodge was constructed, the names Stonewall Jackson Resort and then Stonewall Resort were used for it, sometimes with the tag State Park appended to the end.  These names were just for marketing purposes and did not reflect a change in the official name of the park.Brian Powell (talk) 03:13, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Park Name

message: This article is not correctly named.  The decision was made a while ago to name the articles precisely as named by the West Virginia State Parks system.  Please see the discussion at Talk:List of West Virginia state parks. If you disagree with the discussion on about the naming convention, please leave you comments here.  WVhybrid 20:39, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Obsolete Discussion
Talk:Gore Canyon

message: This is an overall good article that I would love to see expanded. However, there is a need for citations. Also the article comes off to me as opinionated, particularly in the last paragraph.
I removed references to "you" to make it sound less like some random guy talking to me, but did not remove any of the other information because at least it serves the purpose of letting people know it's a dangerous. Hopefully someone who has more resources for this can clean it up better than me.
Hasoan (talk) 16:05, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gore Canyon 

message: I was looking for geological information about the canyons formation when i found this article. If I find any, i'll add it. or, if anyone already knows please add this section.
Hasoan (talk) 16:15, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geology
Talk:Internal wave

message: ----
* The internal waves page has great potential -- perhaps we can add some math, and historical discussion of literature, to bring it beyond "stub" status?  I have some additions in mind for the future, so please keep an eye out to correct my errors. -- Jbsnively 04:57, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes! It was a no-brainer - the first line in this article even calls internal waves gravity waves.--RockMagnetist (talk) 15:44, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

message: I was a bit surprised to see that this article states that internal waves are always internal gravity waves. I'm quite certain that's incorrect.
The two lecture notes I have available on internal waves mainly focus on two types of internal waves: gravital internal waves, and inertial internal waves (driven by rotation), but specify a third driving mechanism: magnetic forces. (Here a link to one of them: https://www.nioz.nl/files/upload/users/258010/book.pdf)
The thing these internal waves have in common is that their stream function is determined by a hyperbolic equation (compared to an elleptical differential equation for surface waves), but I'm not sure whether this is a good definition of an internal wave. Does anyone have a better definition that also includes other forms of internal waves?
Femkemilene (talk) 12:43, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  More general definition internal wave
Talk:Guglielmo Libri Carucci dalla Sommaja

message: ANDREA DEL CENTINA
 ABELS MANUSCRIPTS IN THE LIBRI COLLECTION:
 THEIR HISTORY AND THEIR FATE
:This could be followed up:-Centina, Andrea del Abel's manuscripts in the Libri collection. Not sure who Abel was. 
::Removed from article: ("Libri" in Italian means "Books".) It is unnecessary really as most readers of this kind of article will know this. It suggests a mental origin for his need for books which could go in if any relevant citations are available.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 20:27, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Please put this information back.  Really, people who accidentally get to this page (following the news story) would not know about Libri.  This is Wikipedia.  Never assuming everyone knows about everything.  Coconut99 99 (talk) 17:16, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Trail Ridge Road

message: This article looks like it was written by a three year old. It needs cleanup.RSido 02:42, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Added an infobox, suggested section headers, route description and history. Feel free to add references. --Oddharmonic 02:16, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: This article would greatly benefit from the addition of a map. I have tagged it {reqmap}. N2e (talk) 15:17, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article needs a map 

message: http://trail-ridge-road.com/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.218.130.8 (talk) 01:16, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Links
Talk:List of Rolls-Royce motor cars

message: Column of photos on right was longer than the article, so I put them all at the bottom for the moment.  As the article grows, they can move back to the right --Badger151 20:42, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo layout

message: please don't speak Finnish on English wikipedia
Speak English  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.118.135.94 (talk) 04:10, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ehh... what? If you are talking about the phrase I removed, I did so because that phrase was not in English. This is an English Wikipedia - for a Wikipedia of your language, please select it from here. ~Iceshark7 19:23, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rolls-Royce ostis 2007 aastal ära BMW tehas??? 

message: Why so many articles? What exactly is the purpose of this article? There should be one on "old" Rolls Royce, one on Bentley, and one on the BMW-Rolls Royce. --kingboyk 22:00, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What a mess
Talk:Cuspy halo problem

message: Thank you to all the contributors to this page, it has now been translated to french. Hop ! Kikuyu3 (talk) 20:30, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thanks 

message: Does anybody know if it's "halos" or "haloes?" The spell check doesn't recognize "haloes," but citation one uses "haloes" rather than "halos." JNeutrino (talk) 20:27, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Halos" vs. "Haloes" 

message: The "possible resolutions" section relies on a paper from 2003 to list 3 potential solutions to the problem. I'm not a Wiki guru and don't know how to add in references and such but a fourth possible solution that should also be there is "bar-driven dark halo evolution", Weinberg & Katz 2013, who proposed that a bar galaxy's baryonic bar could transfer angular momentum to the dark matter cusp and flatten its profile into a core. There are also more solutions not listed. This article needs an update!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:644:102:F3D0:9DDA:7A22:5D03:8481 (talk) 22:49, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outdated
Talk:Vanessa Kensington

message: from the relevant sources
--124.78.214.145 (talk) 06:42, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add the image of the character please..... 

message: The article says "It has never been established whether the Kensington in the first movie was also a fembot...", but it's said a couple of times in the second film that she had been a fembot "all along" - so it seems pretty established to me... Thrapper (talk) 00:15, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doubt whether she was a fembot?
Talk:Dwarf galaxy problem

message: I added a ref for the Local Group and Milky Way dwarf satellites to the existing one for the Milky Way dwarf satellites predicted from dark matter simulation, and compared the two to show the problem (11 observed as opposed to 500 predicted for the Milky Way). So the unreferenced tag, whilst previously partly justified, is now unnecessary in my POV and I removed it. I also added a wikilink to this page, and these refs, from Dark Matter which also mentions the lack of dwarf galaxies compared to DM predictions. Puzl bustr (talk) 14:43, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed unreferenced tag

message: The resolution, to this conundrum, could be a question of (simulation) resolution -- if you combine the counts, of Globular Clusters, with Dwarf Galaxies, you quickly reach numbers (100s), completely consistent, with said simulations.  So, perhaps the sims are currently qualitatively, if not completely quantitatively, accurate ??24.143.65.75 (talk) 07:19, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Resolution

message: Thanks to all the contributors to this page : it has now been
translated into french. Hop ! Kikuyu3 (talk) 19:04, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thanks
Talk:Kyoichi Motobuchi

message: Following the sequence of events it seems that in the manga Motobuchi's weapon ends up with Nanahara's group (it is seen in #4) and eventually makes its way into #14.  I am assuming it to be the same model as that in the movie and novel. Luis Dantas 11:33, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Manga weapon
Talk:Mizuho Inada

message: For some reason, one Korean sub renders Kinoshita's name as "Kinoshita Tuyako" WhisperToMe 05:00, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

message: AFAIK, it is Ahura Mazda, a historical deity (and in fact one of the first monotheistic deities) in the novel.  In the Tokyopop manga it is "Gatekeeper Peliphon, Overwatch Meodius, Lucien, First amongst equals", which apparently are made up deities despite a profile page that implies that they are "Elder Gods" or somesuch from D&D basic books.  I have no idea which (if either) was used in the original Manga.  I know that she does not even mention or think of Ahura Mazda in the Tokyopop manga and I suspect she does not know a thing about D&D in the novel.  Adjustments are probably a good idea. Luis Dantas 17:35, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Mizuho's delusional deities
Talk:Takako Chigusa

message: The article is grossly incorrect regarding what Hiroki's reply to the question Takako presents after her confession. When I watched the film, I was highly annoyed that the translation in the subtitles was incorrect, although the mistake is easy to make because of the way Japanese (and some other Asian languages) work when responding to negative questions. The dialogue went like this (didn't bother with the kanji for the names):
たかこ：ひろき、今、好きな子いる？
ひろき：ああっ
たかこ：あたしじゃないよね？
ひろき：違う
Translated into English by me:
Takako: Hiroki, do you have a girl you like/love at the moment?
Hiroki: Yeah
Takako: It's not me, right?
Hiroki: No, you're wrong.
That last line is where people have gone wrong. Responses いいえ, 違う etc. affirm the positive when a negative is used in a question. In this case, though, a correct interpretation could have been done solely on the grounds of 違う being unconditionally translatable into something indicating the assertion made in a previous statement is false. The semantics of negative responses to negative questions/assertions would not even have to be considered.
In any case, from the dialogue alone the only possible correct interpretation is that Hiroki likes/loves Takako. The way the scene continues only reinforces this interpretation. I will correct the article. 80.248.254.68 (talk) 23:25, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hiroki's reply
Talk:Satomi Noda

message: The list of BR weapons claims that Satomi Noda had a Remington shotgun in the movie; however, I just noticed that to be wrong; apparently she uses some sort of machine pistol instead.  Can anyone ID it? Luis Dantas 06:33, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Weapon

message: This makes no sense: "She was a student who took pride in her schoolwork and helping others a lot, but she never was interested in anything else like watching baseball. This was why she was frigid and has a high paranoia level."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.117.148.37 (talk) 21:04, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What
Talk:Fine-tuning (physics)

message: This entry should be referred to fine-tuned universe and then removed. Parveson (talk) 20:00, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

message: The article states, "Theories requiring fine-tuning are regarded as problematic."   It does not state why they are regarded as problematic.  What is unspoken here is that fine-tuning implies that some sort of intelligent entity designed the Universe.  For this to be regarded as problematic, science must have an undue bias against that possibility.  Another manifestation of this bias is that science directs an undue portion of its resources toward disproving that possibility, when in fact it may be correct. 75.163.161.124 (talk) 14:02, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undue bias against fine-tuning and its implications 

message: The article states: "This had led to the discovery that the fundamental constants and quantities fall into such an extraordinarily precise range that if it did not, the origin and evolution of conscious agents in the universe would not be permitted."
There is simply no way to know this. In a universe with much different conditions than our own, life as we know it would probably not exist, but unfathomable other-worldly forms of life would almost certainly come into existence eventually. It may very well be that for every combination of fine-tuned cosmological parameters, there is a coinciding life-form. So the claim that "life would not be permitted" is absurd. 2001:480:91:FF00:0:0:0:16 (talk) 21:23, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: This is not true, because for every form of life you need complex structures. For complex structures to form, you need stable orbitals. stable orbitals are only possible if the natural constants are within a very small range. --MrBurns (talk) 12:43, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unknowable anthropic claim
Talk:Anna Amalia, Abbess of Quedlinburg

message: I find the claim about her library (last paragraph) dubious. Is this maybe a mixup with Duchess Anna Amalia of Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.128.172.174 (talk) 18:09, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Library?

message: The assertion that Anna Amalia had a dalliance with von Trenck is often repeated in the literature, but nowhere have I read in any other source that they actually married and produced a child.  This needs a citation of some sort. The assertion is dubious.
Also, the claim that her library burned in 2004 is absolutely a result of confusion between Princess Anna Amalia of Prussia and Duchess Anna Amalia of Brunswick-Wolffenbüttel (later Weimar).  Her library, housed in Weimar, burned in fall 2004.65.96.183.164 (talk) 22:25, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. The assertion that in 1743 she married the 17 year-old von Trenck remains completely undocumented and is contradicted by her entry on page 102 of Huberty, Giraud and Magdelaine's respected and heavily annotated L'Allemagne Dynastique, Tome V -- Hohenzollern-Waldeck, publshied 1989, , which would not list any children she had, legitimate or otherwise, but would give details of any marriage. None is mentioned. She is stated to have lived from 1723 to 1787, having been both born and deceased in Berlin, and having become Abbess of Quedlinburg on the 16 July 1755. The rumor of this marriage needs to be deleted. FactStraight (talk) 03:31, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Child with Trenck?

message: Who did she secretely marry? And what happened to him? --85.226.47.151 (talk) 09:28, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marry? 

message: The musical comedy Erwin und Elmire (libretto: J. W. v. Goethe) is a work of another Anna Amalia, Anna Amalia of Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel, later Duchess of Saxe-Weimar-Eisenach! See her German MUGI article. MUGI is an online project of the Hamburg University of Theater and Music: /https://mugi.hfmt-hamburg.de/artikel/Anna_Amalia_Herzogin_von_Sachsen-Weimar-Eisenach. It should be deleted here. Susanne Wosnitzka (talk) 07:41, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong work
Talk:ChrisCross

message: The article claims "Williams chose the pseudonym "ChrisCross" so as to avoid confusion with the R & B singer Christopher Williams."
Uh.... apparently he lacked a similar incilination to "avoid confusion" with Kris Kross, or Christopher Cross, for that matter.--The Fat Man Who Never Came Back 21:05, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: odd choice
Talk:Looper (band)

message: If all of the other members of B&S get their own pages, why does Stuart David's page redirect here? Seems inconsistent. Hankypankynohow 21:11, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect 

message: It redirects to a Garfield episode of the same name.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.96.25.220 (talk) 18:20, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Up a Tree Album 

message: Hi, I would like to make the article for Looper in Spanish Wikipedia, and I was wondering if i could use your article as base, since I can't really find more info about the band that what we already have here. Thanks and great article! --Nyao Nyao 10:16, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spanish Article
Talk:Walk the Plank (theatre company)

message: *This looks to be in some serious need of ad cleanup, several introductory parts have been condensed and promotional tone eliminated. The rest will still need quite a bit of work, however. Seraphimblade 02:29, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Rather than engage in edit war here, I've filed for a third opinion. Seraphimblade 02:51, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup tagging
Talk:Actinometer

message: "pyrheliometer"  should NOT be redirected to this page.  A pyrheliometer is an instrucment for measuring direct solar radiation (as opposed to total which a pyranometer does) and has nothing whatsoever to do with the content shown here. Plaasjaapie (talk) 14:59, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: If the usage has changed from what ref 1 says, show us what ref has a better definition; or bring us a new source.  We can't fix it just based on your belief.  Dicklyon (talk) 17:42, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

message: Would someone add a description of exactly how the result is quantified?
12.33.223.211 (talk) 22:51, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yeah, but how does it work?