Talk:List of tallest buildings and structures in Manchester

message: The Beetham tower is now higher than any others - it might not be open for occupation yet, but it is taller now it's been topped out.
Thoughts? --Gavinio 15:58, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's finished now. The hotel is open. David 18:45, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Also finished now is the Great Northern Tower. Soon we'll be able to add the new Civil Justice Centre. David 21:46, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Just thought this might be of use. -- Jza84 · (talk) 03:02, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source 

message: I was just looking at this artlice and wondered if it is time for clear out of sections 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3? As far as I can tell a lot of these developments are clearly never going to be built. I have already removed 2 described by their references as cancelled. Furthermore:
* It is somewhat generous to describe Piccadilly Tower in section 3.1 as "under-construction". The only thing that was ever completed was the clearance of the site. As far as I can tell planning permission expired in April 2010 .
* Zacharie/Gravity Tower's planning consent expired in January 2011. The SkyScrapperNews page that this article references carries a link to a story about the developer collapsing in 2009 
* Sharp Street: Planning Consent expired in June 2010 
* Water Street. Original consent expired in 2010 . Application for extension of consent in same year appears to be still undetermined .
* Lee House planning consent granted 2002 . But no development 10 years on? 
* Victoria Works Tower. If it is this application , consent expired in 2009. A later application in 2008 around the same area  was withdrawn.
* With the exception of River Street Tower, all of the developments mentioned in the Proposed Section appear to have been proposed for at least 4-years with no planning application. Whilst, some of these may eventually progress to being built in the proposed form, perhaps we need to question whether we document them until there is some real progress towards buidling them.
:Taking the example of the Intercontinental Tower. 3.5 years after this iteration was proposed (Theare Royal Tower a few rows below is an earlier iteration of the same development). There is apparently not even no planning application - there is a suggestion that there isnt even an agreement with Intercontinental Hotels  and that the owners of the Radisson are also eyeing the site for their own development.
Finally the following appear to be on life-support. Perhaps we also need to debate whether this article should document them until such time as there is actually evidence of them being built:
* "Under-Construction" is a slightly better tern for Axis Tower than Piccadilly. They built the foundations at Axis before stopping. By all accounts it is in a perpetual cycle of contruction will re-start in the first quarter of the following year.
* VIVO: Planning permission extended to 2014 in 2011 
Pit-yacker (talk) 14:04, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Edit away, you're quite right.J3Mrs (talk) 20:27, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree; the list must be updated, corrected, etc.  There is always the risk that lists, including FLs, become out of date, and really someone ought to keep an eye on them to ensure this does not happen.  Good luck. --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 21:07, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok I have removed all buildings from 3.1-3.3 except Axis and Vivo. I left these, for now as there is still at least outstanding planning consent, and so perhaps an outside chance of them being built.  Or should these be removed as well?Pit-yacker (talk) 17:43, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Time for a clean up? 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:List of tallest bridges in the world which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 13:15, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: As is true with the London page which uses all buildings within Greater London, maybe this should include (or another page be created) all buildings in Greater Manchester. Skylines work in unison with each other regardless of local council boundaries. This would make the page directly comparable with other cities. With a newly elected mayor on the way and a combined authority, Greater Manchester itself works as a single city. Tom 05/04/2017  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.79.208.21 (talk) 11:42, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  All buildings in Greater Manchester should be listed on this page? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of tallest buildings and structures in Manchester. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110809225433/http://www.manchesterconfidential.co.uk/Culture/Architecture/New-skyscraper-planned-for-Manchester to http://www.manchesterconfidential.co.uk/Culture/Architecture/New-skyscraper-planned-for-Manchester
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:39, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on List of tallest buildings and structures in Manchester. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140815184929/http://www.manchester.gov.uk/download/downloads/id/21397/a01_manchester_factsheet_january_2014 to http://www.manchester.gov.uk/download/downloads/id/21397/a01_manchester_factsheet_january_2014
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110705114456/http://menmedia.co.uk/manchestereveningnews/news/business/s/1129411_peninsula_goes_for_a_funky_fitout to http://menmedia.co.uk/manchestereveningnews/news/business/s/1129411_peninsula_goes_for_a_funky_fitout
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140408215946/http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/owens-park-manchester-university-unveils-6929642 to http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/owens-park-manchester-university-unveils-6929642
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130705155536/http://www.westproperties.co.uk/portfolio_deansgate.html to http://www.westproperties.co.uk/portfolio_deansgate.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140307165520/http://www.publicaccess.manchester.gov.uk/associateddocs/selecteddoc.aspx?101119-ddn-0001.pdf to http://www.publicaccess.manchester.gov.uk/associateddocs/selecteddoc.aspx?101119-ddn-0001.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141021124351/http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/business/business-news/watch-how-new-building-dwarf-7951132 to http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/business/business-news/watch-how-new-building-dwarf-7951132
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140221223717/http://www.virtual-planit.com/wordpress/piccadilly-tower-may-see-restart/ to http://www.virtual-planit.com/wordpress/piccadilly-tower-may-see-restart/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:05, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: It has been brought up before on this talk page but I think we should address the possibility of expanding this page to include Greater Manchester (the same way London includes everything in Greater London). Pages such as the tallest buildings in Salford should remain (the same way the tallest buildings in Croydon exists) but should we rename the article to "List of tallest buildings and structures in Greater Manchester" to avoid confusion? On places such as SSC and online media towers like Exchange Court are included as a part of "Manchester" even if in Salford. Given the current rate of construction boom this needs to be addressed or the quality of this article is compromised. BenBezuidenhout (talk) 11:16, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Apologies for not responding sooner. I reverted your edits as I thought it may need more discussion first (your edits can always be reverted back). I think it would be best to first propose a merge of the two featured lists. It can be done following instructions on Wikipedia:Merging. Once the two articles are fully merged then one can be renamed to List of tallest buildings and structures in Greater Manchester and the other redirected to that article. I'm not sure what happens to the featured status when two featured lists are merged, but I would assume that the quality would have to be reassessed at WP:FLRC. An alternative would be to simply create a new article at List of tallest buildings and structures in Greater Manchester that combines the two lists. Note that buildings from the other boroughs of GM would have to be added for completeness in either case. Thanks for your patience, Del♉sion23 (talk) 21:45, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you're replying to the wrong person? I only suggested we merge the two into a Greater Manchester page. Check the history of the article, I didn't do anything hence why I took to the talk page to discuss it first. BenBezuidenhout (talk) 22:34, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greater Manchester 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of tallest buildings and structures in Manchester. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071116010723/http://www.cis.co.uk/servlet/Satellite?cid=1116834043932&pagename=CoopBank%2FPage%2FtplBlank&c=Page to http://www.cis.co.uk/servlet/Satellite?cid=1116834043932&pagename=CoopBank%2FPage%2FtplBlank&c=Page
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:48, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of tallest buildings and structures in Manchester. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140221193213/http://www.byrominfo.com/ to http://www.byrominfo.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:38, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I believe this building is done and missing from this list. It is listed here on Skyscrapercenter incorrectly as 1 Water Street. http://www.skyscrapercenter.com/building/1-water-street/28177 ... Masterscraper (talk) 04:48, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: One Regent