lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Collectivism (disambiguation)

message: This article has been in poor shape for a long time (see Talk:Collectivism/Archive 3#Dab? for example). I finally sat down to read through that student's expansion and much of it has little to do with a common conception of "collectivism"—the article instead lists different ways the term "collectivism" is invoked in a slew of academic articles. Little of it coheres to an encyclopedic topic. My take is that it still makes the most sense to cover collectivism and individualism within the social organization article and to make "collectivism" into a disambiguation page for the variety of meanings ascribed to the term. czar 15:37, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. I don't see a lot of use or reason for this article as is. Even I think re-writing it under it's current premise wouldn't be so useful.SP00KYtalk 16:53, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  All should feel free to expand further with other definitions and at collectivism and individualism. czar 03:47, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, please feel free to fix the 1,582 articles which now link to the new disambiguation page. Certes (talk) 13:54, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scope 

message: The very definition immediately presupposes with its wordings that individualism is only right and good and collectivism is only wrong and bad - individuals 'realise' the truth, while collectivists don't get it, can't do what individualists can, etc. This seems like crude ideology. A single citation is not a justification for this. It should be possible to define these things without obvious value judgements.--79.100.144.23 (talk) 16:25, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: And on top of being imprecise the lead is not even concise. It would be nice if you or somebody else who feels they have the ability to write something better than this to do so. SP00KYtalk 16:45, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 

message: This definition is incredibly biased, as the point entitled "POV" has already observed. 207.53.252.145 (talk) 22:59, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias
Talk:Confucius

message: Add citation for "These efforts spread Confucian ideals to students who then became officials in many of the royal courts in China, thereby giving Confucianism the first wide-scale test of its dogma."
Confucius- Part I. (2021, March 10). Golden West College. https://human.libretexts.org/@go/page/29775 Nableaux (talk) 22:34, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: . User:Nableaux, that Open Education Resource is a Circular reference. The part about Confucius contains a lot of text copied from this article, including the sentence in question. See the Earwig report. Folly Mox (talk) 22:53, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 30 September 2023
Talk:Software

message: I propose to add two citations to the section:
Desktop applications such as web browsers and Microsoft Office and LibreOffice and WordPerfect, as well as smartphone and tablet applications (called "apps").[citation needed]
https://www.pcmag.com/encyclopedia/term/desktop-application
https://www.computerlanguage.com/results.php?definition=desktop+application Mcscroogeduck (talk) 16:20, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request to add citations 

message: — Assignment last updated by Lindseybean28 (talk) 21:24, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: College Composition II

message: 2409:4085:4EBB:89F:0:0:8F8B:FB0F (talk) 14:12, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 8 April 2024 

message: During the recent AfD, problems with the article's sourcing and content were brought up. I have resolved them with a new draft of the article and am pinging participants User:Praxidicae, User:EucalyptusTreeHugger, User:TartarTorte, and User:Aoidh in case any of you would be willing to implement the edit request.
User:Buidhe paid/Software should be copied into this article, above the categories. My version of the article also makes a clear differentiation between this article and computer program. It adds information about software development, software maintenance, quality and security, how software is executed on hardware, and the impact of software in the world.
Thanks! Buidhe paid (talk) 04:41, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request 

message: The sentence "Software patents, like other types of patents, are theoretically supposed to give an inventor an exclusive, time-limited license for a detailed idea (e.g. an algorithm) on how to implement a piece of software," is false.
Patent protection is never awarded to "ideas" but "inventions". The sentence is legally misleading. Rebentisch (talk) 10:49, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, my version of the article fixes this Buidhe paid (talk) 14:21, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  False depiction of law 

message: central processing unit or the brain 2001:4450:463E:B00:61B4:FEE9:BD89:FF0 (talk) 05:56, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cpu
Talk:Computing

message: The first few sentences of this article are a close paraphrase of the ACM Block quote in the "definition" section immediately following.
To have nearly identical text twice in a row, once quoted and once not, feels jarring and redundant.  I'm not sure exactly how to fix this.  Is there a problem with just using the ACM quote to start the article, but adding wikilinks to the topics?  Otherwise I'd say just rewrite those first few sentences from scratch.  They can probably be clearer and shorter anyway.
Emeraldemon (talk) 20:06, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: , we can do better than this!  And should.  I'll have a go.  yoyo (talk) 19:49, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: , done.  yoyo (talk) 20:07, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, looks better.Emeraldemon (talk) 23:01, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intro sentences and ACM quote? 

message: That section's first sentence contained a link to the Absolute (philosophy) article, when the topic is actually computer connection. That seems like quite a logical jump to me. I think a link to Computer network would be much more appropriate. I changed it.
:Please sign your comments on talk pages, using four tildes, thus: ~~~~.  Thanks! yoyo (talk) 19:52, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Odd link in the Computer Network section 

message: Note 2 has a dead link: https://cc2020.nsparc.msstate.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/15September2020-CC2020-Report-v43.pdf  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Qucchia (talk • contribs) 17:41, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken Cite 

message: We know telegraph networks exist from late 16th or early 17th century, and also radio is included in communications in late 19th century, but it is expected ot have very strong signaling because bad weather interferes to the connectivity, I think this obstructive to modern technology ideas for clouds should be forbidden. Editech24463 (talk) 09:46, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Networks, telegraph and radio signals, and bad weather like cloud interfearance 

message: About technical jobs 41.116.103.51 (talk) 12:47, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Pls try to comment here I'm doing a school assignment 41.116.103.51 (talk) 12:48, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Life orientation
Talk:Capital

message: to do with individual creativity and 
Then the money supply and usury cranks will go at financial_capital...
Rather than make assumptions, though, we might be better off just emailing some of these people whose definitions are referenced (Hawken, Harding, Hubley, Putnam, etc.) and seeing if they want to take a stab at this stuff.
Before the cranks show up.
------
Most recent rewrite helps - putting economics last makes more historical sense.
I'm wondering about " imitative, creative, and social " components - this I understand as only applying to "human capital", i.e. "instructional, individual and social" is a breakdown of human
capital that doesn't seem to apply to natural, infrastructural or financial forms - unless we want to include "creative accounting" and "imitative infrastructure " (biomimicry)?
Now that I think about it, it makese some sense, especially w.r.t. Lev and his "brand name capital"....
Am I wrong in assuming imitative=instructional, creative=individual?  Maybe I assumed too much there...
------
Dear English speaking People! There are different translations for the word capital in many languages according to the meaning. For example in Polish language the word Capital does not have a meaning related to the city (political capital). There should be a disambiguation page for interwiki links to work!
Dear person, this article is about the english meaning. This is, after all english wiki. What other words are used in other languages can be dealt with on other language wikis, not here. ÉÍREman
To clarify - our Polish friend was talking about an earlier version of the article which had several sections - one about capitals of countries, one about capital in economics, etc.  He was making the valid point that this style of article makes interlanguage linking difficult -  in Polish the same word isn't used for capitals of countries and capital in economics.  So a proper disambiguation page was called for, which has since been created. Enchanter 23:03 Apr 25, 2003 (UTC)
good disambigulation page. ÉÍREman 23:10 Apr 25, 2003 (UTC)
----
whats the intention behind Docu's recent edit (8 Oct) ? The other language links have been moved from the top to the bottom. If this is part of some convention then its ok.
Also why has the meaningful disambiguation line been replaced by "Alternate uses". i feel the earlier line made more sense. Jay 09:23, 8 Oct 2003 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion 

message: Which spelling is used for the British slang -- capital or capitol? Forgive my ignorance. —scarecroe (talk) 16:11, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You mean, as in That is a capital idea! ...? (Found it in wiktionary) --Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 02:59, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: British term
Talk:Cinema

message: Please do not touch my information until after 12:00 tonight. I understand your concerns but I have a deadline to meet. I am submitting this as an assignment worhth 30% of my mark--Amanda Bortolus 19:38, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello, please read , as Wikipedia is not a free web host. Naconkantari e|t||c|m 19:40, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Homework

message: There has been considerable discussion on Wikipedia about what to name articles related to motion pictures. Most of this discussion has taken place on Talk:Film.
----
" Much of the industry is centered around Hollywood, California, although other regional centers exist."
Is this related to the US film industry ? If this is about world cinema, then its a POV statement. Jay 17:31, 1 Mar 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Do it, rather than whine. Mikkalai 18:37, 1 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Hollywood sucks

message: There are lots of kinds of film besides cinema - photographic film, plastic wrap film, thin oil films on water, thin film electronics, etc.
There are not so many for cinema.
I think Cinema should be the lead article, film should be a disambiguation page IMHO. Leonard G. 02:54, 18 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Cinema or Film?

message: Should there not simply be an additional entry here that is about a "cinema" in the sense of a place where people can go to watch films? Or have they gone out of date now? ACEOREVIVED (talk) 16:53, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: What should be added

message: The usage of "cinema" is under discussion, see talk:movie theater -- 70.51.44.60 (talk) 05:49, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: "Cinema"
Talk:Classical mechanics

message: Actually, F = dp/dt ( Newtonian Force Equation ) Then dp/dt = m * a, yet only when the mass is constant. The mass isn't constant when dealing with many systems, such as rockets when considering the rocket to be the material inside the hard boundary of the rocket, material traveling at approximately the same velocity.
Wikipedia Classical Mechanics articles have a CM tag box on the right, with "F = m a" in it. I think it's silly that the formula used to symbolize classical mechanics is not accurate in many cases. However, I can't come up with a better one, so I am not proposing any changes here. Perhaps someone else can think of a better formula or other byline.
I bring this up because I would hate for people to be misguided, especially if they are trying to understand rocket dynamics. Trying-bold (talk) 23:44, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Classical Mechanics' byline "F = m a" issues 

message: The list of formulations makes a reference to an article with clear neutrality issues. That list should only point to notable formulations that are on par in their fundamental impact with the Lagrangian or Hamilton-Jacobi formulations (as some examples). I suggest the removal of the reference to the Udwadia-Kalaba equation for lack of notability. Reading the linked article, it looks like an attempted promotional push. As is well known, there is no unique formulation of analytical mechanics and the list should only point of especially notable formulations such as the Hamilton-Jacobi equation. The reference to the little-known Udwadia-Kalaba equation in the same vein as the other substantially more notable ones is inappropriate.
- V madhu (talk) 11:38, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference to article with NPOV issues
Talk:Lewis Carroll

message: It is claimed here that the pics of children were taken "often" in attendance of the parents. I don't think there is any evidence for this. Suspekt (talk) 13:35, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Parents or chaperones. --DL5MDA (talk) 09:57, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  pictures of children: dispute 

message: It seems that this topic was added to the article on January 14th, 2024: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lewis_Carroll&diff=1195689949&oldid=1195686740. It's good that it also describes the controversy about this "documentary".
The BBC2 documentary had been produced by Swan Films in London. In the public you only find unauthorized copies of the documentary. Martha Kearney was the presenter. Its first half is excellent. The second half seems to have been produced in a rush. Kearny failed to ask for the opinions of the curators of that the nude photo which allegedly depicts Lorina Liddell.
In 2022 I contacted the Musée Cantini in Mareseilles. They own that photo. One of the curators told me that the photo was part of a collection which the Museum bought from a dealer in the USA. But it also could be that the photo was shown in Paris by the Gallerie Texbraun in 1986. The Museum purchased the photo in 1994.
Images: On the left side of https://snrk.de/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Lorina_Liddell_age20y__and_French_girl.jpg you see the face of Lorina Liddell. On the right side you see the face of the girl shown in the photo owned by the Musée Cantini. The curator of that image won't confirm that the image depicts Lorina Liddell. The curator won't confirm either that the photo has been taken by Carroll/Dodgson. --DL5MDA (talk) 09:36, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Secret World of Lewis Carroll (2015) BBC documentary
Talk:Color

message: The second sentence in the section "Colors of objects" is this:
"Most objects scatters light to some degree and do not reflect or transmit light specularly like glasses or mirrors."
*Corrected.  Constant314 (talk) 07:13, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ungrammatical 

message: I would like to add more information. 76.80.235.226 (talk) 21:32, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 23 January 2024 

message: This page is protected but doesn't display any corresponding icon or banner, which I found a bit confusing... , I think?
- 2A02:560:5829:B000:B9F7:CF82:EEE5:7596 (talk) 13:26, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 13:46, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 20 March 2024
Talk:Color code

message: A lot more could be written on the subject. origins, methods, variations, limitations, etc. ability of humans to perceive shades of gray vs different colors, etc. — Omegatron 01:35, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expand 

message: These sections were plopped down in the article in incorrect spots, and seemed to be nothing but a promotion for a certain person's patent.  If the invention in question is notable, then it needs its own article, and a link from this article, not just two big, largely unformatted paragraphs here.
Adam850 (talk) 10:50, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed section about friendly-fire system 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: not moved
Neither the proposer nor the sole supporting editor gives any policy reason for the proposed move.  The two opposing editors give cogent reasons against the primary proposal.
No such user supports the secondary but not the primary move.  I find no consensus on that point.  In any case, I consider it would be irregular to make the secondary move where the consensus is to reject the primary move.  A freestanding move of Color-coding should be proposed on that page.
David Eppstein makes a counter-proposal to change the redirect at Color coding (without the hyphen).  Whatever the merits of that suggestion, it is out of scope of this RM.
(non-admin closure)  Havelock Jones (talk) 10:09, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Note: WikiProject Computer science has been notified of this discussion. — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 22:55, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Graphic design has been notified of this discussion. — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 22:56, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 16 August 2021
Talk:Chechnya

message: The redirect Chichan has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  signed, Rosguill talk 21:55, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Chichan]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: Someone clearly overlayed an image of the flag of Israel on mobile to break the functionality of the mobile page. I have no clue how to edit it out so I'm asking an experienced Wikipedia editor to fix it. Thanks! 96.224.19.11 (talk) 02:56, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: This is the result of vandalism, which has been reverted. I've purged the cache so it should be fixed now. Nardog (talk) 04:02, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flag of Israel overlay breaking the page 

message: @Mellk Regarding Akhmad Kadyrov, his description as "former Mufti" is factually correct and provides additional context about his background and influence in Chechnya. Taken directly from his page: "Akhmad-Khadzhi Abdulkhamidovich Kadyrov was a Russian politician and revolutionary who served as Chief Mufti of the Chechen Republic of Ichkeria in the 1990s". Secondly,  there is a lack of concrete evidence proving Kadyrov's participation in armed conflict to classify him definitively as a rebel. 
The term "restored" implies a continuity of Russian control over Chechnya following the USSR's dissolution. Therefore, using "restored" inaccurately suggests a return to a previous state of Russian control which it did not have post USSR, ignoring the de-facto independence Chechnya exercised in those years. A term like "achieved" or "established" would more accurately reflect the reality that Russian control was an establishment of authority rather than a reinstatement of an uninterrupted status quo. Ola Tønningsberg (talk) 14:37, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Saying "former rebel" is much more clearer that he switched sides. In regards to the term "restored", Chechnya declared independence in late 1991. It was part of the Russian SFSR. See for example: "Though the Republic split from the Chechno-Ingush ASSR and declared its independence from Russia in 1991, it was not until 1994 that the central government attempted to re-establish federal control over the region." Mellk (talk) 14:59, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: In that case writing "former Ichkerian mufti" is appropriate to indicate he switched sides. Ola Tønningsberg (talk) 02:16, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  January 2024 

message: Pakistan 202.47.63.118 (talk) 17:22, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Love u Ramzan kadro..from Pakistan
Talk:Catalyst

message: Do they really use nickel in the manufacture of margarine?  I thought that nickel was quite toxic to people .. --Dirk Beetstra 20:02, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Nickel]] and [[Margarine]] 

message: It would be far better if this article is made into a redirect to Canalysis, and all the information put there. This is because a catalyst is part of the more general concept of catalysis. Catalysis is process that comprises the catalyst, the reactants, the products, the reaction conditions, and the reaction mechanism.   Andreas   (T) 16:13, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger 