lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Civil law (legal system)

message: Sudan is no longer and Islamic country but a secular one so it should be removed as an example of Islamic states with companies with the likes of Saudi Arabia, Iran or Afghanistan Nlivataye (talk) 14:20, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sudan 

message: “Civil law practitioners, however, traditionally refer to their system in a broad sense as jus commune.”
“Jus commune” here is linked to a page explaining how jus commune is another way of saying common law, which this article does a lot of work establishing common and civil law as contrasting methods. 2603:6010:3206:B64:F807:D836:3544:E8A4 (talk) 20:58, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jus Commune 

message: There are persistent disruptive IP edits (edit warring) removing China as a civil law country. China is a civil law country. Multiple sources say so. IP is removing the claims and sources. Can someone assist? Not sure how to go about this. Dawkin Verbier (talk) 05:08, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: We need better sources, but yes. Alyo (chat·edits) 16:57, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  China civil law? Disruptive IP edits 

message: It seems to me that the history of codifications favors northern Europe a little too much, as southern Europe lacked them before receiving them from the north. For example, I cite the Constitutions of Melfi promulgated by Frederick II or the Sardinian Carta de Logu. Feidhelm (talk) 19:59, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  History of codifications 

message: I think 's last edit is on the right track . The modern usage is not origin-dependent. Would there be objections to changing the lede to reflect this? Ben Azura (talk) 02:22, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lede
Talk:Bus 174 hijacking

message: So many "tragic social" details on the background history of a murderous criminal is for what? Make us to have pity on him?
There's a lot of examples of ex-street kids overcoming difficulties and winning respect of society through hard working and education, I and most of the people don't shed a single tear with the biography of this infamous career criminal (we shed it for Geisa, instead).
Article but limit itself to accounts regarding the bus hostage taking and the coward murdering of Geisa Gonçalves by Sandro Nascimento. --Officer Boscorelli (talk) 13:58, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see WP:SOAP. Wikipedia discussion pages are not the place for commentary. Teimu.tm (talk) 18:18, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  For we to have pity on him? 

message: Ok, we talked a lot about the criminal, but where's the article on the victim biography, family and after facts?
This is a Brazilian movie industry mania: glorifying the bandit and making us all to have pity on him while putting victims in the limbo of forgeting. --Officer Boscorelli (talk) 14:10, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia is your encyclopedia. If you would like to see an article here, please create one. Additionally, discussion pages are for the improvement of articles. Please see what Wikipedia is not WP:NOT and particularly, WP:SOAP. Teimu.tm (talk) 18:15, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where's the article on the victim? 

message: This article needs some big work on verifiability. Much of this information is unsourced and biased (most likely from the films).
I did some reworking, taking out some facts and tones which could be considered dubious, but really, this thing needs an overhaul. I would love to be an apprentice if any more experienced wikipedian wants to join forces.
I'll try to be doing some research on this...improving here and there. I think most of the content is out there, it just needs to be presented here correctly.
I'm going to be adding some templates on the problems. Teimu.tm (talk) 07:04, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reworking 

message: Did Gonçalves live or die? As of 19 September 2012, the article overlooks this important point.Vynbos (talk) 04:54, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Gonçalves

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved (no objections)   Mdaniels5757 (talk) 02:03, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Sandro Rosa do Nascimento →  – His name was "Sandro Barbosa do Nascimento" and not "Sandro Rosa do Nascimento". See reliables sources here: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. SirEdimon Dimmi!!! 07:47, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 9 June 2020
Talk:Professor Chaos

message: from VfD:
Some sort of fancruft, one would assume. --fvw<SMALL>*</SMALL> 13:23, 2004 Nov 26 (UTC)
*Delete fancruft. Gazpacho 13:24, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Can someone add a pic for the anime ep where the boy pretend  to me ninjas ? (Gnevin 01:10, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Anime pic

message: The vast majority of this article is already said in Butters main page. And there hasn't been enough of Professor Chaos to fill an entire seperate article about him. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Thrawny (talk • contribs) 17:19, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delete
Talk:Sarah Harrison (singer)

message: from VfD:
Vanity. Also, I just found out we have a  template, so I'm going to be happy for the next few hours, even though it doesn't include  yet. Might have to fix that. --fvw<SMALL>*</SMALL> 14:03, 2004 Nov 26 (UTC)
*Delete. Vanity article by someone who has only ever contributed vanity, nonsense and vandalism. David Johnson 14:51, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops, my bad, I thought I'd clicked on an N article. That's two bad mistakes in one afternoon, I sincerely apologise to everyone working VfD. --fvw<SMALL>*</SMALL>
*Keep. I also removed a speedy tag from another article someone put on the vandal's work. Niteowlneils 15:21, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:CSS Florida (cruiser)

message: Why is the page disambig'd as (cruiser)? Is there another CSS Florida? If so, it should be added to the list of CSN ships.  Jinian 15:28, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. Any reason that the ship type disambig is used? The ship project page recommends launch year, so CSS Florida (1862). Jinian 22:35, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: They were both launched in 1862, so year of launch doesn't disambiguate. The Confederate Navy had a somewhat confusing habit of having multiple ships with the same name in service at the same time, so disambiguating by ship type is sometimes necessary. McMullen 22:39, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)

message: According to Clive Cussler's book The Sea Hunters, and his research that went into the book, the famous CSS Florida was deliberately scuttled by Union forces, rather than allow her to be returned to Brazil and the Confederates.  Saying that she was hit by another vessel was just a cover story.  At dinner a decade after the war, Admiral Porter privately admitted to the former captain of the Florida (a friend by then) that he had ordered his saboteur (and engineer who approached and left the vessel under cover of darkness via rowboat) to "open the sea cocks and not leave the engine room until the water was up to his chin".  The Admiral said he thought it fitting that she be scuttled over the same spot where the CSS Virginia sunk the USS Cumberland in the Battle of Hampton Roads. --208.116.232.47 (talk) 18:25, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Correction regarding the Florida's sinking
Talk:Mini Jakobsen

message: I'm going to move this page, because the page title should preferably not have special characters as " in the title of page, for technical and security reasons, according to   Meta wiki.
The options for new names are in my opinion Jahn Ivar Jakobsen and Mini Jakobsen. According to Wikipedia:Naming conventions (common names), the name that should be used is the most common one, the one that most people will search for. I believe that is Mini Jakobsen, a choice that should be okay, even though it's not his real name, since other players like Pelé and Magic Johnson are listed under their nicknames as well.
*Okay, I've moved it, after a bit of self caused trouble. There's now automatic redirects from Jahn Ivar Jakobsen, Jahn Ivar Mini Jakobsen and Jahn Ivar "Mini" Jakobsen. I'd propose deleting this last one because of the quotes, but I'll have to check up on that first. Wålberg 17:24, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Motherland (Russia)

message: The Russian word Rodina is a generic word for Motherland, without any other additional meaning. Just like any other word it can be used in a political speech, but there is nothing special about it. The article is wrong to imply otherwise. The It lies in stark contrast to "Fatherland" which is used by Russia now is flat wrong. There is no contrast. Both words are in use. --Gene s 16:05, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. I will rename the article now. Alsh 07:48, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

text: Note the the Talk page is now at Talk:Rodina. I copied the old content from here. Alsh 08:55, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
Template talk:Hist-stub

message: WP:WSS could benefit from less resorting needs if this were to take an arguement (Germany) which would be processed by a switch 

*T'would be nice. I stumble around a lot trying to figure out WSS syntaxes when I know darn well there ought be something in the field. geo-stub, hist-stub, etc. are intuitive.
Cheers! // FrankB 18:03, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  How about adding a switch to these
Talk:Everclear

message: The entry says it's both legal and illegal in Ohio. --Thatnewguy 12:08, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is legal to sell Everclear in the State of Ohio.  However, and, remember, the devil's in the details here as elsewhere, it is important to remember several things.  Ohio is a control state, meaning that the state exercises strong controls on the sale of beverage alcohol in all forms.  Ohio sells hard liquor (equal to or greater than 43 proof or 21.5 per cent alcohol by volume) through contract agencies.  These agencies sell the liquor as agents of the state and must follow all state rules and regulations in the conduct of their business just as if they actually worked for the state (remember your high school Business Law class and the Law of Agency?).  The state says that ordinary retail sales to the general public are prohibited.  Display of Everclear on the shelves and the allowance of access by the public (if stocked by an agency) are prohibited.  In order for a retail customer to purchase Everclear, he/she/it must provide what amounts to an affidavit giving full information as to identity, occupation (the sale of Everclear is allowed for those with a legitimate business, scientific, professional, medical/veterinary purpose for the product), and intended use (a limited number of personal uses [such as using the product to make home-made cordials] are recognized - intending to make "hairy buffaloes" is not recognized).  Upon application, the wise agent will also seek permission from Liquor Control to proceed.  The written material is to be kept on file indefinitely and is available to Liquor Control/law enforcement agents 24/7/52.  The sale of a different Everclear-branded product, Everclear 151, essentially a high-proof vodka, is allowed, so far, without restrictions of the kind just mentioned.  NorthCoastReader (talk) 02:03, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I can confirm that. In Virginia, its sold only on military bases in military liquor stores. Of course, you could also get light brown colored "Military Special" brand vodka for $9 a bottle. My liver and kidneys hurt just remembering it... Bullzeye  (Ring for Service) 16:25, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ohio 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 10:23, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Note: Everclear titles a page with significant content and so it is ineligible to be a target title in a move request unless it is also proposed to be renamed. This request has been altered to reflect that fact. P.I. Ellsworth  ed. put'r there 02:37, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

text: *That's already the case :). Just need to overwrite the dab. Schierbecker (talk) 02:07, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 12 May 2021
Template talk:MetaPicstub

message: What happened to the  parameter? --Phil | Talk 08:40, Jan 31, 2005 (UTC)
I removed it, as I explained in the edit summary at the time.  Here's a longer explanation, which I gave on my talk page:
* For example, Template:Bio-stub used to say "David's face This biographical article is a stub" (when viewed in a text browser), and that isn't even a proper sentence.  The guideline is: If an image has a caption, then choose a good caption, and don't worry about bad alt text or bad title text; else choose good alt text, and don't worry about bad title text.  See Wikipedia:Alternative_text_for_images#Conflict_between_caption_and_alt_text and en:Wikipedia_talk:Extended_image_syntax#Alt.2C_title.2C_and_caption_text_in_extended_markup. The real problem is that there's only one place in the image syntax to specify what should be three different things: a caption (displayed below the image), alt text (displayed by text browsers instead of the image), and a title (displayed as a tooltip by many graphical browsers).  You just can't get good tooltips without getting bad alt text, and the alt text is more important for accessibility, so the tooltips suffer.  There is a feature request on file asking for the three things to be individually controllable.  —AlanBarrett 17:30, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: But there currently is no alt text. (A blank space does not really count as alt text...) -Aranel ("Sarah") 22:20, 2 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: A blank space does count as alt text, and it is the most appropriate alt text in this case.  People using text browsers should see, and people using audio browsers should hear, "This ancient Egyptian article is a stub", not something like "Egyptian Pharaoh This ancient Egyptian article is a stub".  —AlanBarrett 19:40, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: My understanding of proper HTML (which is a little outdated) has been that there is supposed to be actual alt text, and that a blank space does not "count". However, I do tend to agree that a blank space is better for something that is meant to be purely decorative or to convey a small amount of information in one quick glance. -Aranel ("Sarah") 20:36, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: alt is required.  However, setting it to a blank (even alt="") is sufficient, under HTML 4.  Smoddy (t) (e) 14:50, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Alt tag
Talk:Cranbrook, Kent

message: Wasn't there another windmill just behind the Windmill Pub?? Qixil (talk) 08:59, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Windmill

message: Cranbrook cannot be the smallest town in Kent as Fordwich in Kent is the smallest town in England.  See Fordwich  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Franksm (talk • contribs) 10:17, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It is the smallest town to be recorded in the books. To be recorded in the books it takes a long time . So at thr moment cranbrook stands as the smallest town . MaxSmith02 (talk) 10:33, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: What does "recorded in the books" mean? Fordwich is in the Guinness Book of Records, it is famous for having a town council and only being a few hundred people. The Cranbrook claim is based on some kind of functional recognition by the county council in modern times - the claim is based on the Kent Structure Plan which is bound to be more utilitarian than the historical claim by Fordwich that goes back centuries. For planning purposes Fordwich is like a village, even though it is a town - and the Structure Plan is only interested in planning purposes.Le Deluge (talk) 15:37, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not the smallest town 

message: There must be a story here. --81.174.224.233 (talk) 20:08, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  War memorial
Talk:September 11 attacks/Archive 10

message: I have put through some major restructuing. The changes put through are as follows:
Wording added for an international audience. Where I could think of a word or spelling used throughout the English-speaking world to replace a US English term, I have done so. Where I couldn’t think of one to use without disturbing the flow of the article, I have not done so.
Comments about 7 WTC that are already reflected in the 7 WTC article redacted. - removed ref to 7WTC from overview.
A lot of stuff about the name has been moved to Significance of '9/11'
A lot of stuff on responsibility has been merged with  Responsibility for the September 11, 2001 attacks
Lead section too long - some material removed and put into overview.
Reordering of information and redaction of repeated information.
'Investigations' section removed as it didn’t seem to go anywhere. It said there were investigations and there was a report, but didn’t mention its findings.
Prediction section removed. Maybe there is a place to discuss warnings that the U.S. Government and others had before 9/11, the section that I removed doesn't really achieve this.
Conspiracy theory information moved to 9/11 conspiracy theories.
Some links removed as the list seemed too long. 
There was also an intention to shorten the article to below 32kbs. I haven’t played around with the piccis, but there seem to be too many and to crop up in odd places now. jguk 19:37, 17 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Good trim. Maurreen 23:04, 17 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Major restructuring

message: the link is w:zh:九一一袭击事件,both the zh-ch and z-tw,please use this and delete the zh-tw and zh-cn link.---Vipuser 06:26, 30 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Why on earth was the ZH-TW removed in the first place? WhisperToMe 22:39, 30 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  please change the link to chinese
Talk:Hourman

message: Referring to Rick Tyler as the "Silver Age" Hourman is somewhat misleading. The character first appeared in the mid-1980s, well after the end of the so-called Silver Age. Also, he has been reestablished as DC's "official" Hourman in recent issues of JSA where his father, Rex, has returned to earth and retirement and the android Tyler was destroyed in Rex's place by Extant. 
I propose the "age" descriptions be replaced by "first", "second" and "third".
rockhopper10r 17:28, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Almost two year later, the current covention is CODENAME (REAL NAME). Which means that this article should split off Rex into his own article and leave this as a disambiguation. CovenantD 00:51, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: We need a citation on the writer who created Hourman. I say this because this page suggests it was Gardner Fox.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by JohnLynch (talk • contribs) 10:14, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Writer creator given as Ken Fitch in Toonopedia and Grand Comics Database; Who's Whose: The Golden Age Artist Index, MoviePoopShoot.com (July 14, 2004): "Comics101" (column): "Strength in Numbers", by Scott Tipton, and other non-mirror sites. --Tenebrae (talk) 15:07, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Creators
Talk:J. P. R. Williams

message: how many times did jpr williams play in the pack for wales
::I don't think he ever played in the forwards for Wales and would be surprised if he had. AFAIK he always played at full back (apart from some outings as a flanker at club level in his later years).Mike Spathaky (talk) 06:01, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The Junior Wimbledon Final in 1966 was played between a Russian and New Zealander (Korotkov vs. Farlie). Korotkov won in straight sets. Perhaps John Williams won a competition in Wimbledon at around that time, but I do not believe he has ever won an official Wimbledon title. [J)
There is no doubt that the above contributor is correct and I cannot understand why JPR allowed his final edited autobiography to even suggest that he won Junior Wimbledon. (At)
John Williams was a reasonable tennis player at British level, but Junior Wimbledon was beyond his great talents. Of course, he never entered it, let alone won it. The biggest suprise is that he has not clearly come out with this fact. (Godfrey - Bridgend)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.29.132.101 (talk) 21:39, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Wimbledon

message: In the lead it says, "He was known universally as J.P.R. Williams (or sometimes just as JPR...)" This is not quite true. Up to 1973 he was known universally as "John Williams". By the time J.J. got his first cap John Williams was the best-known (and the best) full-back in Europe. It was only when J.J. was an established fixture in the national team that John Williams the full-back began to be called J.P.R. That should be reflected in the lead.  134.226.252.160 (talk) 11:32, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Known universally as J.P.R.? 
Talk:Hack Canada

message: VfD summary (6 keep +1 anon [4 of which were on days 8-11 of voting], 1 neutral, 4 delete +nom) Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Hackcanada
----
Filling out this article. I'm going to take a shot at it. I dunno if I can do it justice, but I'll try. :/
--Othtim 06:55, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:2004 in the United States

message: Do you think NASA space probe facts should be on this page? What with NASA being a US agency, but the actual things not taking place in the United States (although I've listed events in Iraq which feature the US Army).
Similaly what about other US related, but not implicitly US facts, such as Space Ship One and the awarding of the X-Prize. These kind of topics will be on 2004 in Science but should they be here for completeness? --NeilTarrant 18:07, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Nasa