lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Secret of Treasure Island

message: *
*
*
Will get to adding these at some point soon.  Cirt (talk) 15:42, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources to use 

message: See review at subpage, /GA1. Cirt (talk) 20:32, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: GA review

message: *
What pages from this source deal with "The Secret of Treasure Island" ?  Cirt (talk) 14:23, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weiss source added to Further reading section 

message: The book does have that on that page, but it's in a list of tall tales about and by Hubbard recounted by other residents of Jack Parsons' place. The list also includes claims like escaping from the Japanese on Java and sinking two submarines. This is merely a cite that Hubbard made that claim, not that it was true. AndroidCat (talk) 15:08, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: On the other hand, unlike Hubbard's claims of escaping from the Japanese on Java and sinking two submarines, the claim that he adapted the screenplay from his own novel is not that implausible.  It would be less plausible if Columbia's claims that the serial was based on Treasure Island were more plausible, but as one of one of our existing citations comments, "The 'secret' was probably that the serial had little relationship with the Stevenson classic." (Harmon & Glut, p. 329)  I've revised the passage so that it describes the conflicting claims of Columbia and Hubbard as claims and cites the claims. -- 65.78.13.238 (talk) 15:50, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Strange Angel cite
Talk:Ice Cream, I Scream

message: * This film's author was likely thinking in English, because "dondurmam, gaymak" is Turkish for "ice cream, I scream", but without the play on words. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 06:14, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:The Devil and Daniel Webster (film)

message: Something is fishy with the writers listed here. This film debuted in 1941, but the writers listed were born in 1943 and 1956. Raul654 (talk) 18:38, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The only writers listed are Benét and Totherot, both of whom were born in the 1890s. 71.200.138.188 (talk) 15:00, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Fishy
Talk:Hiroyuki Kobayashi (baseball)

message: I just noticed that this page is the only page for a person named Hiroyuki Kobayashi, but there is another famous person with the same name.
The other Hiroyuki Kobayashi is a famous video game developer who works for Campcom, on projects such as the upcoming Devil May Cry 4.
When his name is mentioned on some of these video game pages, it links to this article about the baseball player. Just thought someone should know.
(63.231.146.123 (talk) 07:04, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  More than 1 Hiroyuki Kobayashi
Talk:Ian Thorpe and drug testing

message: Object - People say the article on Ian Thorpe, is too big, which is why I am doing this. Blnguyen  (bananabucket) 06:40, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok.  Is there a more specific title name possible for this article?  Like Ian Thorpe Doping Allegations or Ian Thorpe Performance Enhancing Contraversy   just some ideas. Fcsuper 06:53, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

text: (Edit conflict) I agree with the title for what it is attempting to cover. That said, however, I don't think it should exist: it strikes me as a profound case of 'recentism'. Why not just rewrite in précis for the main article?--cj | talk 06:57, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I hate destroying info, since I spent about 100 hours on creating this FA when I was not so efficient, and people are wanting to scupper the FA and demote it, citing the length for one thing. Of course, a better way could be done. I'll see if I can shift the main detail of the race reports to the sport pages and if so, probably, moved the drug thing back. As for recentism it is, and I think the best way is to cover historical events in more detail. I have done a few things like this recently (1955 South Vietnamese election, 1960 South Vietnamese coup attempt, 1962 South Vietnamese Presidential Palace bombing, 1964 Brinks Hotel bombing, January 1964 South Vietnamese coup), but I note that I think you have been involved in editing articles on recent Australian political kerfuffles as well...at the risk of sounding like a prick. In any case, I'd say pop cruft is the place to target. Blnguyen  (bananabucket) 07:03, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Can we archive it for now on a user page, and then if the importanced of this matter is determined over time, re-add it as a wikipedia article? Fcsuper 05:37, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

text: No, this is needed as a fork for the purposes of an FA. It is also going to be expanded, now that it is a separate article and unconstrained. Blnguyen  (bananabucket) 05:46, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move 

message: You will notice Thorpe has not come out and said the level was x in comparison to the medical accepted limit, must be because it would not help his im inniocent stand.
The "No proof" of drug taking is the same as some guy with 100,000's of dollars hidden under the bed. You cant prove its from somthing illegal, but its very susspicious and reason will tell you the truth!--203.192.92.73 14:25, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  So what was the actual levels? 

message: I see "Hunter" with a page number, but what is Hunter? Tony (talk) 02:02, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography missing 

message: Thorpe has never tested positive to doping so why does this article exist? It seems as though its based on media speculation and suspicion. Michael Phelps and Ye Shiwen have also been accused of doping, but they dont have articles for it. Portillo (talk) 04:20, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doping
Talk:Seyferth–Gilbert homologation

message: Who calls this a homologation?
A homologation is a reaction (or a sequence of reactions) which converts a molecule RX, containing a functional group X, to a chain-extended (+ CH2) derivative RCH2X, still containing the same functional group X ("homo" = "the same"). 
Conversion of an aldehyde into an alkyne is no homologation, even if the carbon chain is extended.
134.130.101.232 (talk) 17:08, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Homologation?
Talk:Amtsakhara

message: What was the rationale of the decapitalisation? The Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_%28capital_letters%29#Titles doesn't say anything about the difference between recognised and unrecognised leaders' titles. Here is one example when the word 'president' is capitalised. Alaexis 06:44, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They are not officially president, prime ministers and never will be until the law and Jurisdiction will not prevail over the so called de facto status of some regime. Again, all of them are self-imposed, impostor representatives of so called governments which were not elected in any recognized or fair democratic elections. Therefore, don’t capitalize their titles and don’t make it sound they are real officials with recognitions as per their job description. Ldingley 14:36, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'm sorry but those are just your thoughts about these matters. They're not supported by anything yet. Alaexis 15:13, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Nop, you just dont want to co-operate due to your loyalty to the separatist regimes. Ldingley 16:00, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Paris, France (film)

message: reviews found and added, nominated for (did not win) national awards. MadScot (talk) 23:34, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contested Prod 

message: According to the film's credits, it was written by Tom Walmsley, based on Walmsley's own novel.
However, the director, Ciccoritti, told me personally, about a decade or so ago, that this novel is unpublished, or at any rate was unpublished at that particular time.
Varlaam (talk) 11:51, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Based on a novel
Talk:Anurodh

message: The Telegraph Shahid • Talk2me 15:55, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review
Talk:St. Clement's School

message: Do they have any connection with the school? Was St. Clements Avenue Named after the school. If so, why is the church called St. Clements Church. Does St. Clements School have a connection with St. Clements Church or was St. Clements Church named after the street. Blackbombchu (talk) 05:38, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about St. Clement's Avenue and St. Clements Church
Talk:Raga (film)

message: Would be great if someone could reduce the image in film infobox − needs to be much, much smaller (it's such a lousy-quality image, but at least it's close to the original poster, I think). I've added the 2010 DVD cover also and tried to reduce this first one ... no joy. Anyone? JG66 (talk) 14:40, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reducing size of 1971 film poster
Talk:King Solomon's Mines (2004 film)

message: So why is this named "2004 film", when the artile starts King Solomon's Mines is a 2004 American two-part television miniseries, meaning it is not a film but miniseries... 91.154.234.194 (talk) 17:52, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  2004 film? 

message: The plot is incomplete.  Nothing of the Quartermain/Maitland adventure of finding her father and the mines is mentioned.  Basically, more than half of the mini-series' plot is missing.
Shouldn't this be corrected? 2600:8800:784:8F00:C23F:D5FF:FEC4:D51D (talk) 12:13, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot
Talk:King Solomon's Mines (1985 film)

message: The sound track by Jerry Goldsmith is almost the same as in the Indiana Jones-films, which was composed by John Williams. Isn't that plagiary?80.141.242.77 (talk) 20:59, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The sound track 

message: The Reception section says that is held by "many" to be not as good as the "original" 1950 film; this is both original research, as it isn't substantiated in any way, and also POV - what criteria are used, and in what manner is not as good? How could this be expressed properly anyway? Added to this is the meaningless use of “original” to describe the 1950 movie: the 1950 version is at last the second version, after the 1937 version, and nor does the 1985 movie claim to be derived from the 1950 film - they are all dramatizations made from a common source. Jock123 (talk) 11:43, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The "original" film…? 
Talk:Kevin Long (artist)

message: Hi I created this page out of respect for Kevin Long, a brilliant artist.
I can't seem to get the formatting right and keep screwing up the links I'm trying to cite.
Could use help!
: Cleaned up the formatting a bunch, needs a little bit more work.
: — Sethkills (talk) 22:28, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled

message: the references here are a mess. i have made some attempt to clean up what is here but the effort to move forward will be great. —¿philoserf? (talk) 20:02, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  references are a mess
Talk:Miss Evers' Boys

message: --71.38.32.65 (talk) 19:41, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

message: good movie
anyone know if this movie is based on a true story or not??  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.49.225.25 (talk) 22:57, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Walt Moryn

message: I don't know how to document this [if some-one has access to Wrigleville by Brosnan, that might have it], but when-ever MM was at bat at Wrigley Field, the crowd would let out a loud "Mooo" sound. [Maybe this was done with other people named Moose, but I only heard it with MM.] Kdammers (talk) 05:59, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moooo
Talk:Weird War

message: I want to know if Ian Svenonius wrote this article about his band, Weird War.  It shows signs of being his prose, of which I am a great admirer. Cameron.metz 07:06, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I wrote alot of it.  Before I started messing with it it was kind of a mess, so I don't think Svenonius had much to do with it.  He seems like the kinda guy who'd write using decent english.  But you never know.... Drewcifer3000 07:37, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: If anyone is interested in adding more WP:RS to this article, there is some coverage in the Washington Post, in particular, here. Wine Guy Talk 09:44, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Washington Post references
Category talk:Wikipedia sockpuppets of T-man, the Wise Scarecrow

message: Oh, come on, the meat puppet is ok, no problem there, not at all, its fair enough... actually I don't have a problem with the rest either, but featuring all IP addresses I've ever edited from... come on. At least three of those were only from times I edited without signing and the rest are clearly and intentionally tied to the other accounts without. Furthermore, including Talk pages? hahahah, That's just too thoroughly intending to make it seem like I have an empire of sockpuppets. I mean, whatever, it's fine if you guys keep it, but I want to point out that this exess of listing looks silly and that I'd obviously be grateful if you guys would be kind enough to retire whatever you consider to be redundant or thorough. Thanks beforehand. --T-man, the wise 07:18, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Power walking

message: Is the Reeves book, referred to by an earlier poster, (and now added as a reference by me!),  in fact about power walking as the term is currently understood?? A quick read of the reviews on Amazon suggests it may refer to a more static activity than the present term. Bob aka Linuxlad 07:20, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: NO!. Power walking is definitely different from race walking - it is I think designed to inefficient as regards speed. And at those sort of speeds there is a need for a definition of when one has 'broken into a trot' and the 'one foot on the ground' definition is usually taken to be the correct one. Linuxlad 14:37, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reeves book

message: How is this different than fitwalking?  The opening paragraph is the same, word for word. Nerfer (talk) 20:04, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Support merge: Too many articles about this, seriously. Prinsgezinde (talk) 02:49, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with fitwalking 

message: — Assignment last updated by Brittany814 (talk) 03:57, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: 2023SP Communication Research Methods
Talk:Seaford branch line

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) – MaterialWorks 19:48, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Seaford branch line →  – This name is used by the Sussex Communities Rail Partnership (see here), which works on the line. The name also covers the Brighton–Lewes section, which I propose be added to this article and accordingly removed from East Coastway line.The name was also used in this Argus article (though of course this was in direct reference to the SCRP).While it seems to be only a brand name used by the SCRP, with no official use by any railway authorities, I believe this name is still an improvement over "Seaford branch line", which I haven't seen used in any notable sources at all. 31.221.4.2 (talk) 14:43, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

text: Oppose moveing the Brighton to Lewis section. From the East Coastway talk page, I gather that the route has always included the Brighton to Lewis section, with the only debate being the Keymer Junction to Lewis section. Neutral on name change. Techie3 (talk) 12:59, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

text: Oppose - common usage seems to be still the current page name (i.e., SBL). The Sussex Express, the Guardian and others use SBL, while a vast minority use Sussex Downs. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 15:32, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 26 April 2023 

message: Just would like to let you know that Australia’s Seaford railway line is being considered to be moved to Seaford line. Are either titles too ambiguous considering the existence of the UK’s Seaford branch line? You can comment on the discussion at Talk:Gawler railway line#Requested move 18 August 2023. Thanks, Fork99 (talk) 21:09, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion regarding similarly named article
Talk:Arboreal theory

message: The Arboreal Theory has been disputed by scholars, as there are many arboreal animals that do not have primate features such as the forward facing eyes, fingernails instead of claws, reduced olfaction (sense of smell) as well as tactile, grasping hands.  When regarding Sciurids the terrestrial species actually have greater orbital convergence (forward facing eyes) than arboreal species.
Primates probably did not develop their features due to life in the trees.
Reference: Cartmill, M. 1974. 'Rethinking Primate Origines' Science, vol. 184, p. 436-43
I'm planning to create a Wikipedia page about Arboreal Theory as it applies to primates, beginning with an overview of why this theory is crucial in my study of primatology. I'll outline the development of this theory and the key minds behind it. The main content will dive deep into the theory's principles, how primates have adapted to living in trees, and provide examples. I'll compare these adaptations with those of ground-dwelling primates, and discuss the theory's role in primate evolution.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nianshaoli (talk • contribs) 04:43, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: So what's the alternate theory? I haven't read this article, but this is the first I've heard of it, after many decades of writing about biology. Also, while it's interesting that not all arboreal species have the exact same constellation of traits as primates, I'm not convinced that's a nail in the coffin for stereoscopic vision, an enlarged neocortex, and grasping hands and feet being adaptations to arboreal life. Any more on this than this one 25 year old paper? After all evolution is partly historical too, not all purely adaptive.
Eperotao (talk) 23:46, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

message: When did mammals first take to the trees?
--1000Faces (talk) 18:48, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date? 

message: — Assignment last updated by WritingTeacherC (talk) 15:26, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: ENGL2650 Science Writing Origins, Ethics, and Emerging Genres
Talk:Disused railway stations on the Bristol to Exeter Line

message: The section on Beam Bridge station includes a link to 'Beam Bridge', which is presumably to the village of that name but instead links to an article of bridges of beam-type construction. This possible because there appears to be no article for Beam Bridge which is a hamlet within the parish of Sampford_Arundel (per that article). I suggrest the link be removed.  as I'm not part of this interest area I'll leave it to more interested parties to decide on , and effect, any needed change.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mwra (talk • contribs) 11:00, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for spotting that, I've removed the link. Geof Sheppard (talk) 12:35, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beam Bridge - incorrect link
Talk:85th Motor Rifle Division

message: : 85th Motor Rifle Division did not take any part in II World War. This division at 06.22.1941 was simply rifle division. This formation of 85 Rifle Division (first formation) was absolutely destroyed at Juny-July 1941 in Belarus. 85-th Rifle Division (second formation) was created by way of re-called of 2-th Leningrad division of irregulars at Septemper 1941 and this formation has not any link to first formation. In whole, there are many mistakes in this article  Шнапс (talk) 07:13, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Chicago film industry

message: moved to talk as extremely incomplete. RJFJR (talk) 14:11, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Filmed in Chicago

message: The article needs a section on the Selig Polyscope Co. PlaysInPeoria (talk) 21:49, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Selig Polyscope Co. 

message: *Information on Chaplin's career is misleading and incomplete; revise
*Significant source is lacking: Hollywood on Lake Michigan by Arnie Bernstein
*Add names and short histories of other early studios
PlaysInPeoria (talk) 21:58, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notes Towards Future Edits 
Talk:Jibarito

message: Saying "a proper jibarito" is a somewhat subjective way to phrase that. Perhaps it should be changed to "traditionally" or "often a jibarito will have..."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.225.99.133 (talk) 02:46, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Proper Jibarito?

message: I find it a bit hard to believe that it was invented in Chicago during the 90s when I had them in Puerto Rico during the 80s. Anyone else's experience? Any references to a more concrete history?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.214.234.65 (talk) 21:49, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Invention/History 

message: I removed this because it had been up for a year with no citation. "It was invented in 1991 by Jorge Muñoz and Coquí Feliciano in Aguada in their restaurant, Plátano Loco (crazy plantain). ." There doesn't seem to be any indication that the Aguada sandwich exists beyond the one restaurant, that it was invented there when this says it was, or that it follows the same recipe as the Chicago sandwich. A jibarito is more than just a sandwich on plantains; other elements like garlic mayo are part of it.75.56.48.72 (talk) 07:35, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsourced
Talk:Museum Campus

message: It would be better suited for this article to be merged with Chicago Loop until more information can be written about the Museum Campus. KyuuA4 00:20, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is not located in the Loop.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM)  22:55, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  here is a good reference explorechicago.org.--Nickvet419 (talk) 10:00, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with Loop
Talk:North Side Gang

message: This article has been seriously vandalised.  Everything in the Redevelopment section and throughout the rest of the article after that is made-up crap from someone who thought they were funny but who lacks real creativity.  The vandal even tampered with the sections called Bosses of the North Side Gang and Members of the North Side Gang to insert his/her made-up gangsters.  I suspect at the beginning of the article the vandal also inserted "family" in North Side family Gang.  I saw this quite a while ago and didn't have time to address it and I see it's still there.  If you'll note there are no sources for any of it because it was all conjured out of someone's tiny, uncreative brain.  Please revert to an older version because this article really makes Wikipedia look really unreliable. Lock & Key (talk) 08:36, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: Some of the phrases in this article need re-wording, for example: "Frankie reassumed the throne and George happily took over..." Reassumed the throne is not a term used in mob articles, and there is no proof George happily took over. Keep opinions like this out. There is also a lot of use of first names/nicknames when I think full name should be used. Square126 (talk) 16:46, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phrasing 

message: Good tale. Wish it was true. Try fiction next time. Thedeparted123 (talk) 01:25, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Made-up Gang 

message: If someone wants to argue that the gang didn't end in 1935 and has remained active ever since, get some proper sourcing. Until then it should remain as it is. No nonsense about a "Nick 'The Actor' Jantz" and adding tons of ethnicities either. Bataaf van Oranje (Prinsgezinde) (talk) 20:48, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Large revert 

message: "they were quickly dismissed."
What was dimissed, the officers or the charges?  Vaughan Pratt (talk) 02:36, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  quickly dismissed?