Talk:1632 Polish–Lithuanian royal election

message: The article is too short, and is incomplete, and therefore does not meet the completeness criterion at WP:WIAGA. Not only is the lead section too short, and doesn't adequately summarize the article (see WP:LEAD for tips on improving this section), but its main sections and content is very short as well. The article also doesn't follow the manual of style too well. It would help to review that, in particular the section regarding section headers (WP:MSH). A photo or photo(s) could also help the article as well. Dr. Cash (talk) 18:00, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I will expand the lead and fix the headings, but your other comments hold no water. The main body of the article is very comprehensive - point me to other sources that could be used to expand it, please. I believe that this article is one of the most comprehensive descriptions of the Sejm of 1632, in English or Polish. As for the photo... 17th century? You are not serious, are you? :) --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  23:51, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Review

message: I found a couple of issues that need to be addressed before the article can be promoted to B class:
;Consistency
*Sigismund vs. Zygmunt
*Date format (dd MMMM yyyy vs. MMMM dd, yyyy)
;Prelude
*"Sudden heart attack that Sigismund suffered on 23 April 1632, and his death in the morning hours of 30 April, forced the issue to be taken up again." Sentence is awkward
;Election
*"metropolies" Are these metropolitans?
*"At least 3,543 votes have been cast for Władysław." were cast
*"When the election result had been announced ..." were announced
Overall, a very interesting article. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 04:03, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Saw your review, chipping in with a bit of copy-editing and an extra point here and there. PЄTЄRS J V ►TALK 06:59, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that mine ans Peters edits addressed those issues (thanks, Peters!). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 19:06, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you both (and Volunteer Marek) for the improvements. Promoted to B class. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 03:54, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  B-class review 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Polish–Lithuanian royal election, 1632. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070521020616/http://kamunikat.net.iig.pl/www/knizki/historia/mironowicz/czetwertynski/02.htm to http://kamunikat.net.iig.pl/www/knizki/historia/mironowicz/czetwertynski/02.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081211065741/http://www.poczet.com/wladyslawiv.htm to http://www.poczet.com/wladyslawiv.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091027041339/http://geocities.com/skrzydla/ to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Footnotes
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:01, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified