lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Honda RA099

message: ===Car Information===
Some of the car information is missing, I didn't want to be speculative about it. Add it in if you know please. 
 
===Postlethwaite death===
The reports of Harvey Postlethwaite's death are a bit sketchy, if anybody has any clarifications on it, please do add them into the article.
I think Honda aborted the project and then Postlethwaite had a heart attack.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.20.11.151 (talk) 12:37, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Author Requested Additions

message: The reports of Harvey Postlethwaite's death are a bit sketchy, if anybody has any clarifications on it, please do add them into the article.
I think Honda aborted the project and then Postlethwaite had a heart attack.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.20.11.151 (talk) 12:37, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Postlethwaite death
Talk:Jane Byrne Interchange

message: I would strongly recommend dropping the "The" from the name - It can be referred to as such in the article proper - but for categorization and proper naming of articles, I would have moved it - but I don't want to step on any toes. If there are any other interchanges in the world referred to by this name - a dab page would be in order. master sonT - C 05:09, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I would move it. I'm trying to figure out, in spite of Chicagopedia's insistence, what the Spaghetti Interchange is. I have always, always, always heard it referred to as the I-55 at I-90/94 interchange just south of the Circle Interchange. On WGN-TV, anyways. —Rob (talk) 16:27, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The name of this article

message: The infobox map looked funky due to the strange area with the thick red outline. I can't override it with  or similar. I used the "What links here?" feature, but I have found nothing relevant. I checked Wikidata, but the map provided does not match the map that the infobox displayed. Does anyone know where this map comes from so I can remove the border? AlphaBeta135 (talk) 00:31, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It's linked to Wikidata here. @Evad37 how can this be avoided? –Fredddie™ 07:29, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map change 

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that :File:Jane M. Byrne Interchange Traffic.webm, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for June 21, 2023. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2023-06-21. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you!  — Amakuru (talk) 21:20, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured picture scheduled for POTD
Talk:Jōgen (Heian period)

message: Jōgen may refer to:
*Jōgen (Heian period) (貞元), Japanese era from 976 to 978
*Jōgen (Kamakura period) (承元), Japanese era from 1207 to 1211
This set of nengō used to be identified as
*Jōgen (first) (貞元), Japanese era from 976 to 978
*Jōgen (承元), Japanese era from 1207 to 1211
It was suggested that the period designations would be clearer; and the same pattern seemed useful in the cases of other homonym pairs in the list of Japanese era names:
    * 976_ 貞元 |Jōgen (976 - 978) ---> [Jōgen (Heian period)]
    * 1046 永承 |Eishō (1046 - 1053)
    * 1099 康和 |Kōwa (1099 - 1104)
    * 1131 天承 |Tenshō (1131 - 1132)
    * 1142 康治 |Kōji (1142 - 1144)
    * 1207 承元 |Jōgen (1207 - 1211) --> [Jōgen (Kamakura period)]
    * 1222 貞応 |Jōō (1222 - 1224)
    * 1278 弘安 |Kōan (1278 - 1288)
    * 1312 正和 |Shōwa (1312 - 1317)
    * 1361 康安 |Kōan (1361 - 1362)
    * 1381 弘和 |Kōwa (1381 - 1383)  
    * 1504 永正 |Eishō (1504 - 1521)
    * 1555 弘治 |Kōji (1555 - 1558)
    * 1573 天正 |Tenshō (1573 - 1592)
    * 1652 承応 |Jōō (1652 - 1655)
    * 1926 昭和 |Shōwa (1926 - 1989)
If you have any further comments, questions, suggestions, etc. ..., please feel free to contribute as you see fit at Talk:Japanese era name. Ooperhoofd 01:48, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Homonyms
Talk:Jōgen (Kamakura period)

message: Jōgen may refer to:
*Jōgen (Heian period) (貞元), Japanese era from 976 to 978
*Jōgen (Kamakura period) (承元), Japanese era from 1207 to 1211
This set of nengō used to be identified as
*Jōgen (first) (貞元), Japanese era from 976 to 978
*Jōgen (承元), Japanese era from 1207 to 1211
It was suggested that the period designations were clearer; and the same pattern seemed useful in the cases of other homonym pairs in the list of Japanese era names:
    * 976_ 貞元 |Jōgen (976 - 978) ---> [Jōgen (Heian period)]
    * 1046 永承 |Eishō (1046 - 1053)
    * 1099 康和 |Kōwa (1099 - 1104)
    * 1131 天承 |Tenshō (1131 - 1132)
    * 1142 康治 |Kōji (1142 - 1144)
    * 1207 承元 |Jōgen (1207 - 1211) --> [Jōgen (Kamakura period)]
    * 1222 貞応 |Jōō (1222 - 1224)
    * 1278 弘安 |Kōan (1278 - 1288)
    * 1312 正和 |Shōwa (1312 - 1317)
    * 1381 弘和 |Kōwa (1381 - 1383) 
    * 1361 康安 |Kōan (1361 - 1362)
    * 1504 永正 |Eishō (1504 - 1521)
    * 1555 弘治 |Kōji (1555 - 1558)
    * 1573 天正 |Tenshō (1573 - 1592)
    * 1652 承応 |Jōō (1652 - 1655)
    * 1926 昭和 |Shōwa (1926 - 1989)
If you have any further comments, questions, suggestions, etc. ..., please feel free to contribute as you see fit at Talk:Japanese era name. Ooperhoofd 01:49, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Homonyms

message: The sexigesimal name for the first year of Jōgen was hinoto-u,Brown, p. 340. which another way of identifying Ken'ei 2 (1207). --Ooperhoofd 01:43, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: To be added later ?
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Occult/Articles

message: The reason for formatting the page with all the articles factually listed is as follows.
*(1) to the best of my knowledge, the recent changes function installed on the main project page only works for the articles explicitly included on the page here. If the articles are part of some other function, I don't think they show up.
*(2) the list also gives an idea of what articles have been added to the project since the last time checked. Clearly, if a new article is listed in a category that is not listed in the category as listed on this page, then that article may have just recently been created, and it would probably benefit from having the banner and assessment placed on it. 
Of course, if someone wants to revert the specific listing, for whatever reason, they are free to do so. I would be interested in the reasons for doing so, though, if for no other reason than possibly to learn some things which might be true that I don't know at present. John Carter 18:54, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Format of page
Talk:Shabbona

message: The article history (which is short) for the merged content that came from the redirect at Shabonee can be found here. IvoShandor 22:36, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger

message: Have anyone come across the name translation of "Shabbona" other than the "built strong like a bear" or "built like a bear" as neither "strong" (zongen/zong’-) nor "bear" (mko/-ko) is found in his name. With that name translation, I would have expected the name to look more like Zongko (Oj: Zoongikwa), but all the recorded spelling variations are rather consistent with the "Shaw-bo-neh" pronunciation, which means the recorded name translation is in error or only part of the name was recorded, causing a mismatch between the recorded Anishinaabe name and the recorded translation of the Anishinabe name. CJLippert (talk) 17:55, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I haven't seen any other translation, multiple references to the built like bear name but no other. I don't think inserting "supposedly" is a very good tactic, and probably a bit too OR-esque, I'd be more comfortable just removing the sentence entirely than I would making personal judgment calls about it, regardless of the knowledge possessed on said topic.IvoShandor (talk) 12:14, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh yea, I will keep my eyes open for any other references. IvoShandor (talk) 12:15, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Edited "which supposedly means" to "which was recorded to mean" as this will shift the emphasis from what the name means to how it was recorded. CJLippert (talk) 16:54, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds good, hope I wasn't too harsh.IvoShandor (talk) 17:12, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

text: "Remove" is harsh, but not mentioning the name evicerates expectations as well.  I think the shift in focus was a much better solution to address the verifiability.  On my end, I will scope through what I can find in oral histories to see if there are any clues from that end. CJLippert (talk) 17:21, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Name translation
Template talk:Sabrina the Teenage Witch

message: I created most of the links on the template just recently because before I got there the Sabrina page was a huge mess and a template was going to be made, I know more than anyone what should be included. 53180 18:58, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The new "Based Upon" colomn is much more correct, and includes the comics. It shows how the film inspired the series without being part of it. But I don't mind what discision is made.Russell  Talk 21:09, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestion

message: In the wake of renaming Sabrina, the Teenage Witch (TV series) to Sabrina, the Teenage Witch (1996 TV series) perhaps we want to change this template name as well, but I have left it as-is rather than break every page again. Elizium23 (talk) 20:06, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possibly rename to add 1996
Talk:Suprbay

message: The Suprbay is important as it relates to the Pirate Bay and to Suprnova.org. These are significant and have detailed Wikipedia articles. It significance will grow after the re-launch of Suprnova.org, so the speedy deletion tag is not needed and there are alot more of pages that are more useless, like userpages.
Ma1kel 19:01, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Scott Bullock

message: I am not sure what makes this lawyer particularly noteworthy.  Please explain.  Pharmboy 19:04, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "Important enough" or "qualified" are subjective terms, and have no effect here. You really should read WP:notability before contesting to see if the person *really* meets the criteria.  They may, but if what you wrote was the most important cases, I would say not.  There are tens of thousands of lawyers in the US (I know, I worked in a firm).  Most argue "first amendment issues" and the like, daily, so that is not notable by itself.  Being lead council on a SCOTUS case would quality (co-council, it would depend)  What matters isn't what WORDS you use, it is if the person fits the notability policy, period.  Extremely well written and researched articles are deleted every day because they were not notable enough.  It may be that you need to instead merge all these lawyers into the main article, and have a subsection for each one.  I would argue that would likey be the solution.  Unless they are truly notable....they are not.  Pharmboy 21:32, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: And the problem was that you DIDN'T make that case in the article, requiring someone to follow and research to learn this.  This is why you must ASSERT NOTABILITY in the article, and not rely on the links.  Whatever it is that makes the person notable, you need to make that perfectly clear in the article, or this happens.  Simply "argued before the US Supreme Court in..." would have sufficed just fine.  Remember, THOUSANDS of articles are added regularly about ordinary people and don't belong, and need to be weeded through.  Thousands.  It is a huge task, and is done 100% by volunteers.  Pharmboy 14:17, 7 August 2007 
(UTC)
"He was co-counsel in and argued the landmark case, Kelo v. City of New London, one of the most widely discussed Supreme Court decisions in decades."  I guess I'm confused as to what further research you needed to conduct to learn this other than reading the article.  If there is a standard wikipedia method to asserting notability other than directly writing it in the article please let me know.
Jake315 15:55, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: what makes this lawyer particularly noteworthy
Talk:Joseph Edward Connolly

message: As noted on the article page, this article includes text from the public domain Dictionary of American Naval Fighting Ships. -- But|seriously|folks  19:04, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 
Talk:New Bridge, Mitrovica

message: Is this really the name of a specific bridge? If it's not the actual name (translated into English, at least) then this article should be renamed with the actual name, or the translation of it. Even then, I'd query whether it's sufficiently notable, even bearing in mind the situation in the city, to warrant a separate article... – Kieran T (talk) 02:50, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Real name
Talk:Continental XI-1430

message: I have a print-out that the HES (Kimball) sent me that goes into a lot more depth on the Hypers. I'll dig it up and add a lot more stuff to this article over the next few days. In the meantime, does anyone know if we can use the image on the USAF Museum page? It states it was made by the USAF, that means we can use it, right? Maury 19:37, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes! Sometime in the last year or two they changed their policy and all photos now used on the site are from the public domain. See here for full details. --Rlandmann 02:41, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Egggcelent... Maury 02:45, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Continental I-1430

message: I have gone through the article and have changed text to reflect the references that I have added.  I have at lest one reference per paragraph, and have used four books, an article at the enginehistory.org web site and the National Museum of the USAF.  I have removed the 'needref' template.  Regards, Buster40004 Talk 22:51, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: Does anyone have a citeable source for the bore and stroke? The ones in the article give only 1,090 cuin, not the 1,430 shown. True figures are 5.0 x 5.5, NOT 5 x 4 5/8, but I can't find where I got those numbers. AMCKen (talk) 05:39, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Specifications

message: This section seems to promote the notion that high output per displacement is the measure of aircraft engine performance. Actually the ratios of power to weight and of specific fuel consumption (power/pound of fuel) is much more important and those figures were not given in the comparison to other engines. To conclude that the I 1430 "would have been a winner" based on hp/cid figures is a gross assumption. Also consideration of the Allison V-1710 would show that despite lower hp/cid ratings it had a higher hp/pound than the Merlin and likely the I-1430. Of course, without the figures on the I-1430 we don't know. Another factor is power at altitude which is affected largely by the amount of development work done on the engine. This was where the Merlin shined and the Allison fell down due too its reliance on poorly refined turbo-supercharging, an immature technology at the time.
At any rate there was too many conclusions based on too few facts in this section which needs to be rewritten.Corumplex (talk) 23:26, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Design

message: Assuming this is the correct engine some reasonable quality pics can be found at:
https://www.si.edu/object/nasm_A19600103000
©Geni (talk) 15:15, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible images
Talk:Pratt & Whitney R-2000 Twin Wasp

message: Bore and stroke yield 1,999.5 cuin, not the 2,004 given. AMCKen (talk) 03:43, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Source? - BilCat (talk) 08:21, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It is not necessarily the displacement that is wrong, you need to find a ref to change this, not a calculator. - Ahunt (talk) 15:27, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I just consulted the Type Certificate Data Sheet which is cited as a ref for the article and it says bore of 5.75" and stroke of 5.5" and displacement of 2004 cu in, so I think you are missing something there in your calculations. The TCDS is an approved engineering document prepared by the manufacturer and approved by the FAA. It is possible there is some error, but it is more likely you are missing some factor. You are going to need to find a very good ref to overturn the TCDS. - Ahunt (talk) 15:32, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Displacement
Category talk:Organisations based in Fiji

message: A user (who was apparently unaware that the s spelling is every bit as legitimate and correct as the z spelling) emptied this by moving everything to a category with the z spelling, then deleted it. This was an improper, as names should never be changed without reference to :Wikipedia:Deletion review, so I have restored the status quo ante. Dominictimms 19:18, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Khabarovsk Bridge

message: latitude and longitude of
Imeni Telmana, Russia is:
48° 32' 43" N / 134° 58' 56" E
it appears to be on an Island in the Amur River.
Is there a risk it is,in fact, a ghost town like many along the railway? There is a place in western Russia with the same name.
The town may be named for Ernst Thälmann, "Имени", i.e., "named after / in memory of" a "Talman".
Russian wikipedia is no help as it mentions the village but has no article:
имени Тельмана — село в Смидовичском районе, Еврейская автономная область
at
http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A2%D0%B5%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%BC%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B0
G. Robert Shiplett 14:00, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Imeni Telmana
Talk:Dana Berliner

message: Dana Berliner is an author and litigator of national prominence.  She is a senior attorney for the Institute for Justice co-founded by Clint Bolick.  Mrs. Berliner was the lead counsel for the landmark Supreme Court case Kelo v. City of New London and is one of the preeminent property rights litigators in the country.  In addition to her work in the courtroom, Berliner has published works on the topic of eminent domain and had her ideas quoted in national publications such as the New York Times and the Washington Post.  This page is still under construction, but the fact that its content is incomplete should not be grounds to delete a page on a very notable person.
Jake315 19:21, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Chester Racecourse

message: I removed the following. Not only was the word "unique" misused, but, off the top of my head, the racecourse at Worcester is also in the city.
The racecourse is unique in that it is the second only racecourse in the UK along with York that lies within a city.
qp10qp (talk) 13:18, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed sentence

message: The Roodee is the area which now has a racecourse. These two topics need seperating. It's like have one article for Deva Victrix and Chester. They occupy the same site but are patently different.146.199.57.209 (talk) 22:56, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Roodee and the modern racecourse are two different entities
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Biography/LibraryThing top authors

message: Comments:
*This page was set up on August 6, 2007, by user:LA2 who is also /profile/LA2 on LibraryThing.com. The list was copied without prior permission. I think the list is not copyrightable and that LT founder Tim Spalding would agree anyway. I intend to withdraw the list if he does not. The purpose is to compare a popularity ranking of authors with Wikipedia's coverage of the same. I think such a comparison can be of great value to the WikiProject Biography. LibraryThing is one of few places where you can find such a ranking based on a large number of observations.
*The reported numbers in parenthesis are holdings, as reported on LibraryThing. That means if one person has two books by author X and another person has one book, that is 2 + 1 = 3 holdings.
*Names with a "(was: ...)" parenthesis at the end contains names as listed on LibraryThing, which are different from Wikipedia article titles. In most cases, this is where Wikipedia puts a space between initials, such as J. K. Rowling.
**Several of these could be caught automatically, by running the LibraryThing name through the list of Wikipedia redirects (which exists as a separate dump file) Dsp13 20:21, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Dsp13, yes, you're right on every point. I'm thinking of a :m:Toolserver application rather than this static list. In addition to automatic redirect following, one could also do interwiki links, to analyze other languages of Wikipedia. I'm also having positive feedback from Tim Spalding, founder of LibraryThing. --LA2 06:35, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Administrative divisions of Kosovo

message: Kosovo is not part of Serbia anymore because Albanians declared independence from Serbia on February 17, 2008. Therefore, the WikiProject Serbia class should be removed. --Arber (talk) 13:14, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Could you provide us with some internationaly promoted document/source in which is stated your saying? Until you do so, statement is unsourced and shows one PoV, the one i'm not agreed with. --PrimEviL 16:16, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: About the WikiProject

message: Names should be reflected primarily in the Albanian language because it is the primary language in the Republic of Kosovo. Serbian names could follow thereafter. --Arber (talk) 13:14, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Names should reflect common English usage, whatever that usage is. For the purpose of writing in the English Wikipedia, the names used in any language other than English, by the people of Kosovo, Serbia, Egypt or China are irrelevant. Remember that articles are intended to be understood by English speakers. - Consistency with other Wikipedia articles is also important. I have modified the article accordingly (diff.). - Regards, Ev (talk) 16:41, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You may not be aware of the related UNMIK regulation, which states that the names in Albanian must precede the names in Serbian. The regulation can be found here: http://www.unmikonline.org/regulations/2000/re2000_43.htm (see Section A of the regulation). Feel free to distribute this source.--Arbër Let's talk  09:12, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Names

message: Could someone good at images please make an SVG image (CC-licensed) similar to this one? Thanks! 
Heroeswithmetaphors (talk) 04:29, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image request

message: This article needs to be updated. In the commons there are 3 map versions of the Districts of Kosovo, which of them is correct? There is maps of Serbian districts in the period 1991-1999/2000, this is OK, but which are the boundaries of the districts/regions created by UNMIK? Which are the boundaries of the regions created after Kosovo independence declaration of 2008? Do they exist? --Пакко (talk) 08:04, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Districts of Kosovo?
Talk:Homeland (supermarket)

message: Should not the article be to the actual company HAC, Inc. and not Homeland which is really just the name on the sign.   The article should mention that Country Mart stores are part of the company.  That Marc Jones is the CEO.  That the company is union shop.
The article says the corporate headquarters is in Edmond which is simply wrong.  Actually it is in Oklahoma City, OK fairly close to the state capitol.  Trust me, I've attended meetings there and the address HAC lists on its documents is 390 NE 36th Street. Oklahoma City, OK 73105 (which I just copied from an ESOP statement recently issued.
Listing the company on List of employee-owned companies might be in order as well.
I'd do it myself, but I got a conflict of interest and thus should not edit the actual articles.  68.97.15.29 (talk) 18:51, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Article needs revison