Talk:Driver's license/Archive 1

message: I think this should be deleted until cited. I couldn't find anything on google remotely resembling this, and I've never heard anything of the sort. Perhaps this happens in very very rural areas, but I've worked in the disability community in many areas of the U.S., and this is the first I've ever heard of something like this. People with disabilities who don't drive generally use paratransit service when available, or get specific Medicaid funds for hiring drivers if in more remote areas.  Triangular (talk) 01:41, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: licenses issued to people under 13 who live with people with disabilities?

message: There is a lot of interesting (and useful) detail about how to transfer your old license for a new one when you move. Perhaps it's not "encyclopedic", but this article already has a lot of un-encyclopedic detail, and for comparison purposes, it would be useful to have all this information in one place. As an example, if you move to Washington State in the US, you must take a "road test" to get a license, no matter how long you've been driving other places. If you move to New York, you simply need to turn in your old license, but you need to bring your actual Social Security card. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.81.34.199 (talk) 09:03, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Transferring a license

message: To clarify the confusion about where it's called what:
Hong Kong: http://www.td.gov.hk/about_us/history_of_transport_department/licensing_services/development_and_changes_of_driving_licences_/hong_kong_driving_licence/index.htm (driving licence)
UK: http://dvla.gov.uk/drivers/drivers.htm (driving licence)
Ireland: http://oasis.gov.ie/transport/motoring/full_driving_licence.html (driving licence)
Singapore: http://www.spf.gov.sg/faq/ndl/ (driving licence)
United States: 
http://www.state.nj.us/mvc/press/archives/newddl.htm   (driver license)
http://www.mass.gov/rmv/rmvnews/2004/newids.htm (driver's license)
http://www.aot.state.vt.us/DMV/LICENSES/OPERATOR.htm (operator license)
Contrary to what the article said it is not called Driver Licence in California, it's Driver License:
http://www.dmv.ca.gov/
Australia: http://www.rta.nsw.gov.au/licensing/downloads/licenclassindex_dl1.html (driver licence)
New Zealand: http://marcel-lancelle.de/private/fw/stf_dl_b.jpg (driver licence)
84.147.134.209 10:46, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Terminology

message: The driving age in Massachusetts is listed as 16 1/2 years old. This is untrue. You may apply for a learners permit at the age of 16 and 1 day. The minimum age to apply for a LICENSE (not a permit) is in fact 16 1/2.
:I changed the list of driving ages...Massachusetts is no longer on the state that are not 16 years old.
:: in massachusetts, there was one age for no driver's education, and a different age for those with driver's education. I do not know if this has changed or not. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.81.34.199 (talk) 08:58, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Massachusetts

message: I know from having been told by my grandad (whos 92) that 'when he was a lad' you went to collect a drivers license because you needed one for your job (ie cars were so expensive that you drove somebody elses - as their chauffeur), or (as happened for him) a superior in the army could "license" you to drive.
The general population didn't have or need to have a driving license. Selphie 14:30, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: It's interesting that when drivers licenses were introduced in Moscow in 1900, the regulations were extremely lax compared with cabrivers. Motorists should only procure neccesary papers and show the physical ability to drive before the authorities, while cabdrivers had to pass rather strict examinations. --Khathi 03:12, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  history 

message: The driving age in New York is not 17! It is illegal for people under 18 to drive in New York City unless they are New York State license holders who are 17 and have passed Driver's Education. The driving age in the rest of the state remains 16 years old. 16-17 year olds living in New York City can legally obtain a driver's license, despite the fact that they may not legally drive within New York City, and driving in the rest of the state is allowed for them. This should be corrected.
:Corrected with notes about the graduated licensing law. Steve J 23:42, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: New York

message: Since the EU has more or less standardised their driving licence design and regulation, there should be a column "European Union". See the German Wiki-Entry  for example. -217.194.34.124 11:48, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Europe 

message: Ok, from a few of these posts, I'll see if I can distill a few improvements to this article.
*1) Who came up with the concept of requiring a driver's license, when, where?
*2) Dates of the presentation of the idea and subsequent implementation, in the respective countries.
*3) Evolution of the use of these from simply permission to drive to their current use as a valid form of ID, particularly in the US. Was there any resistance from the general populace?
*4) State revocation of licenses for driving violations. Also, can and do states (state in both the US and general sense) revoke licenses for infractions and crimes which have nothing to do with driving?  Suspension of licenses is not covered yet.
*5) Situations such as old folks driving? What about disqualifications for people of the age to drive who would normally be allowed to? Is there any information on mandatory revocation ages for old folks?
*6) Feature creep as regards driver's licenses (True story: I was talking with my friends, outside a local watering hole, after untethering my bike, and a cop demanded my driver's license. When I told him I didn't have it with me (I wouldn't have given it anyway, I'd done nothing wrong), he asked how I would prove who I was. I simply told him he'd have to take my word for it. He wasn't happy, but didn't do anything adverse.
*7) The future of driver's licenses in various places.
JD 06:48, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, I've added info from the NYT archive on the earliest DL laws in North America.  Unfortunately, those old articles don't exactly state when the French or Germans came up with their laws and who was first.  I guess it'll be up to French- or German-speaking WP users to do that research!  --Coolcaesar 20:50, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Driver's License History 

message: I have heard that in large cities like Beijing and Shanghai there is an execption for foreigner to have the licence changed. They can use an international permit in order to rent a car but it can only be driven within the city limits. Can somebody confirm this? -ThorstenS 10:57, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  PR China 

message: I have seen an older US-drivers licence (North Carolina) - the back side was machine readabel. is this true for all US-states. Wahat informations are coded?
A picture of a back-side of an us-licence would be nice--84.137.12.100 17:10, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a magnetic strip on the back of most licenses (for example, California).  I vaguely recall that it may carry in a simple digital format the same textual information printed on the front of the card.  I'm not sure, though.  Anyone know more about this?  --Coolcaesar 01:08, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  US-drivers licence 

message: Some of the reasons for decline that are listed in this article are downright absurd and show a deep lack of understanding of teenagers today. There is no way that someone would have higher social status for owning a computer rather than a car. It's also absurd to say that teenagers find that it's "more convenient" to have their parents drive them, and several points on the list are things that have remained the same for the past fifty years (ex. busy lives with atheletics and extra curricular activities). This needs to be fixed. --Berserk798 18:23, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  The entire list reeks of "original research" or "personal viewpoint" and should be deleted unless and until whomever contributed it can come back with supporting citations.  --Coolcaesar 23:57, 29 October 2005 (UTC)

text: I was the person (under an unlogged-in name) who began the list of reasons. Many of them are found in that LA Times article mentioned. However, others have added to them. I fixed the two reasons declared "absurd" by Berserk798. I changed what was likely a misunderstanding of what the reason meant. -BrianClass07 16:56, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Computers being social tools as opposed to cars??? 

message: I saw this in the US section: "and more recently, the so called war on terror." Isn't that POV? I can't figure out what exactly to change it to though. --Mosquitopsu 20:21, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: This article needs some moderate cleaning up, as well as the expulsion of certain, ahhhh shall we say "author commentary" contained therein (ie there are a few opinion pieces)
:I concur. This article is a MESS! Unfortunately, I'm not a transportation lawyer, so I don't know where to begin cleaning it up.  --Coolcaesar 03:28, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  needs cleaned up 

message: Footnote 5 points to a DVLA press release giving various facts about the history of licensing in the UK. One of these is that driving tests were suspended during the Suez Crisis. Why was this done? Can anyone add this information? Another fact, given in the paragraph but not appearing in the source, is that the queen doesn't require a driving licence. This is plausible, as she doesn't require a passport since they are issued in her name, but still, it needs a source. The footnoting as it stands is misleading, as the page linked to says nothing about the queen. 86.136.94.95 02:07, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Suez, and the queen

message: I have performed a significant restructure/shift-around of this article in an attempt to improve its quality and coherence. It made sense to me to shift the history section from the bottom of the article to the top, and also place generic sections (like organ donation and its use as identification) up the top, before launching into specifics about driver's licenses in different countries. I also rearranged the country specifics section to alphabetical order, because previously there seemed to be no order to it whatsoever (perhaps the order in which people added them to the article?). I have also split Canada off from the United States and given it its own section, because most of the joint section consisted of paragraphs starting with "In the U.S.", indicating there isn't too much similarity between the two countries' systems.
There may be residual repetition in the article, and also instances of over-linking (or not linking the first instance of a word, but linking a later instance). Please do clean these up if you see them.
Finally, the "Australia" section is quite incoherent and hodge-bodge. It is NSW-centric and needs to be fixed. I might get around to it another late night. - Mark 15:50, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major article restructure 

message: I have a pretty big issue with some lines of text in this article tipified by this example from the third to last paragraph on 'Australia':  "...or the more grammatically correct "Driving Licence"
In what way is the term "Driving Licence" more grammatically correct than any other?  What does grammaticality have to do with anything at all here?  Compound noun conventions may have a grammatical tendency, but there isn't a strict grammatical structure, only convention.  As a linguist, I see this point as non-factual and sorely opinionated.
--Alex DG 15:53, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Australia section is pretty poor and incoherent overall. I plan to overhaul it within the next week. - Mark 05:39, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed "grammatically correct". Tocharianne 16:13, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Word Choice Issue 

message: "although European Union drivers who move from one EU state to another can continue driving on their original licences until the age of 70.". This is not correct. If you move from one EU country to another (and also EEA countries like Norway and Switzerland) you have to exchange your old licence for a new one. You do not have to take another test, your old licence is accepted in lieue of a test and is sent back to the issuing country to be cancelled.
Citation: get a copy of the British driving licence application form from a Post Office. It now contains a section for exchanging a EU/EEA licence for a British one. TiffaF 06:52, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is incorrect. You may exchange another EU/EEA licence for a British one if you want to but this is not compulsory. See "Driving in Great Britain (GB) on a licence issued in a European Community/European Economic Area (EC/EEA) country" (my emphasis):
European Community and European Economic Area
Licences issued in the European Community and European Economic Area make up two groups that are treated equally. The full list is:
Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Republic of Cyprus, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Romania, Portugal, Slovenia, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom.
Visitors
If you hold a valid community licence and are visiting GB, you can drive any vehicle if your licence is valid. The appropriate full entitlement for the vehicle you wish to drive must be shown on your licence.
Residents
If you have a valid community licence, this will authorise you to drive in GB for the period set out below. Alternatively, you can exchange your licence for a British one at any time.
Provided your licence remains valid you may drive in GB:
Car, motorcycle driving licence holders (ordinary driving licence):
    * until aged 70 or for three years after becoming resident, whichever is the longer period
Lorry, minibus, bus driving licence holders (vocational driving licence):
    * until aged 45 or for five years after becoming resident, whichever is the longer period
    * if you are aged over 45 (but under 65) until your 66th birthday or for five years after becoming resident, whichever is the shorter period
    * if you are aged 65 or over for 12 months after becoming resident
In order to continue driving after these periods, you must get a British driving licence.
 -- Arwel (talk) 22:46, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  International considerations 

message: I was wondering if it were possible to create a catalogue of driver's licences from different states. Is this legal? I could certainly understand the illegality of such a database, but I would be interested to see what the ID's of different states look like. 
Also, we should consider cleaving this article by country, keeping the main article as a link to multiple daughter articles. Anyone object?
--Reid 21:13, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleaving the Article and Driver's Licence scans

message: Maine: 15 years and a certificate of completion from a licensed driving school to obtain a learner's permit. 16 years or 6 months following the issue date of the permit to obtain a driver's license.
I'm quite sure to obtain a license, you must be at least 16 years of age. so the 'or' should be changed, as it makes it look as if you can be 15 1/2 and get a license, which is not true.
--MunchableSandwich 20:50, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maine license requirements 

message: More nations use the 'Driving' Prefix for their licences and I think this should be the prefix as the title. My opinion is that the articles on Wikipedia are becoming more and more Americanised even when more people in different countries refer to it as a different thing. 172.206.53.14 14:51, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There really isn't a factual basis, one way or another, for saying that it's better to use one version of modern English over another. My personal opinion is that since Wikipedia is hosted on servers in America, and was founded by Americans, and since American is the world's best country, it should be American English. But the differences between American/Canadian and British/Australian are so small...it's just a letter here and there...that I don't think it really matters. It's not like it puts some sort of limit on the type or amount of information that the article can convey -- so it's really just a petty thing. Also, refer to WP:ENGVAR; a driver's license doesn't fall under the category of a topic with strong ties to a given country. They're used worldwide. Piercetheorganist 15:01, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  One or the other with redirects, not both. That page name suggested just looks unwieldy. Catwhoorg 15:05, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, I should that America has more native English language speakers who are also drivers. --Coolcaesar 17:10, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change title to Driving Licence/License? 

message: Is it safe to redirect that to here? Motorbikes are mentioned in the article, but I'm asking because I'm not sure if this article is about motorbiking license. TheBlazikenMaster 22:54, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it is. The motorbike licenses are some of the license categories discussed in this article. --MPorciusCato 10:59, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Motorbiking license]] 

message: I was looking at this list, and realized that Vermont is not on there.  I don't know enough about editing to put the information in there, so here it is if someone else wants to put it in there.  learner's permit-age 15, junior operator's license-age 16, operator's license-age 18 (I'm pretty sure about that last one, though it could be 21)junior operators are on a graduated driving level- this means that after three months they can drive siblings and after six they can drive anybody, unless there is an unimpaired adult (age is somewhere from 21-25 i think) in the passenger seat.  You need to take driver's ed to get your license, unless you are 18, at which point you can go and take the test.  If anyone feels like putting some of this info in the table, it would be greatly appreciated.68.142.38.107 (talk) 23:48, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vermont 

message: I have corrected the section on South Australia to reflect the spelling and usage conventions of that state. This includes licence and licences (noun), license and licensed (verb). I have also changed Driver Licence to Driver's Licence as this is the official and common usage. Citations for this have been added. I have no doubt that similar conventions exist in the other Australian states. Ozdaren (talk) 08:01, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  South Australia 

message: In 2009, new Italian drivers will be restricted to 50 kW per ton cars. But, they could drive a Hummer H1 on this! MyWiki54 (talk) 15:46, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Italian driving licence 

message: What? say again?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.77.141.134 (talk) 08:57, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Italian driving licence 

message: Should the word 'license/licence' be spelled consistently throughout this article or should the spelling be changed to suit the country being referred to?  Martin Hogbin (talk) 00:07, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling 

message: the backdoor loophole may have been closed. i called the dvla today and asked about licence exchange. they ask if you have taken the test in the country you hold a licence in. i dont know how they verify it, but they did ask.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.74.179.78 (talk) 01:39, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  backdoor 

message: "Delaware has a reciprocal license exchange for Germany and France.[31]"
I am quite sure PA does too. Bolegash (talk) 04:28, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pennyslvania 

message: There is no law saying that one has to carry ID card along with Driving License. Only documents needed are car registration papers and aforementioned License. Furthermore, having ID card for all people above 18 years of age is mandatory but carrying it - isn't.
22:12, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poland 

message: Since when have "[the] Dominican Republic, Spain, Sweden and Venezuela" been in Asia? Peridon (talk) 10:24, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  A query 

message: Currently, the United States section states:
"The eligible age varies substantially by state. Nationally by age 16 one can obtain a license after passing the requisite tests and drive without adult supervision."
As the first sentence states there is no national law determining when one can obtain a license and it varies by state from 14 years 3 months to 17 years. The wording of that second sentence is also a bit unclear. I propose changing the sentence to read:
"The eligible age to obtain a drivers license varies substantially from state to state. In a majority of states one can obtain a license that allows driving without adult supervision by age 16, after passing the requisite tests."
Ahecht (TALKPAGE) 21:46, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Note: I endorse and support this request as non-controversial and would have made the edit myself if not for the full protection which appears inappropriate.  I could see full move-protection, but there shouldn't be more than semi edit protection at best. —  (t • e • c) 01:19, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: FWIW, the protection wasn't over the proposed move, it was due to edit warring over spelling within the article, and whether WP:ARTCON allows different sections of the article to use different spellings for non-proper nouns. See the discussion just above the proposed name change. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 01:53, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  Not done: The page's protection level and/or your user rights have changed since this request was placed. You should now be able to edit the page yourself. If you still seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. --Redrose64 (talk) 20:36, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 11 May 2014 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on Driver's license. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140201153614/http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/malaysia/article/drivers-can-renew-licence-on-birthday-from-nov-21/ to http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/malaysia/article/drivers-can-renew-licence-on-birthday-from-nov-21/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120215082749/http://www.csv.go.cr/servicios/licencias.html to http://www.csv.go.cr/servicios/licencias.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140508025233/http://www.sertracen.com.sv/licencias-mainmenu-68/tramites-de-licencias-mainmenu-69/revalidacion-de-licencias-extranjeras-mainmenu-165?task=view to http://www.sertracen.com.sv/licencias-mainmenu-68/tramites-de-licencias-mainmenu-69/revalidacion-de-licencias-extranjeras-mainmenu-165?task=view
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/rules-regulations/administration/fmcsr/fmcsrruletext.asp?rule_toc=778§ion=Appendix%20C§ion_toc=108400
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120130224444/http://www.drivetest.ca/en/license/ExchangeReciprocal.aspx to http://www.drivetest.ca/en/license/ExchangeReciprocal.aspx
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120226220743/http://dmv.dc.gov/serv/dlicense/get_non_us_citizen_convert.shtm to http://dmv.dc.gov/serv/dlicense/get_non_us_citizen_convert.shtm
*Added  tag to http://www.txdps.state.tx.us/DriverLicense/movingtotexas.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160115135808/http://ec.europa.eu/transport/home/drivinglicence/index_en.htm to http://ec.europa.eu/transport/home/drivinglicence/index_en.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:08, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Kentucky is listed as one of France's reciprocal states.http://photos.state.gov/libraries/france/5/acs/paris-driving.pdf
--Troyeseffigy (talk) 21:37, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kentucky 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Driver's license. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080213182618/http://www.fmcsa.dot.gov:80/rules-regulations/administration/fmcsr/fmcsrruletext.asp?rule_toc=778§ion=Appendix%20C§ion_toc=108400 to http://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/rules-regulations/administration/fmcsr/fmcsrruletext.asp?rule_toc=778§ion=Appendix%20C§ion_toc=108400
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160116022105/http://driving-in-singapore.spf.gov.sg/services/driving_in_singapore/information_drivinglicence_conversion.htm to http://driving-in-singapore.spf.gov.sg/services/Driving_in_Singapore/information_drivinglicence_conversion.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120104050954/http://flhsmv.gov/news/pdfs/PR102111.pdf to http://www.flhsmv.gov/news/pdfs/PR102111.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:38, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: External links modified

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Driver's license. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100822173508/http://ogov.newswire.ca:80/ontario/GPOE/2006/02/22/c0061.html?lmatch=&lang=_e.html to http://ogov.newswire.ca/ontario/GPOE/2006/02/22/c0061.html?lmatch=&lang=_e.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110928154346/http://www.icbc.com/licensing/lic_renew_replace_new.asp to http://www.icbc.com/licensing/lic_renew_replace_new.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:54, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: My understanding is that the driver's license in the US was not always required and driving was a right and not a privilege.  This stands up to reason when you consider that the mode of transportation being replaced was the horse, horse driven buggy, or oxen and wagon.  None of these required a license or had age restrictions.  Driving animals was common place and the motorized vehicle was considered unusual.  Before I left my hometown in 1971, there was a law still on the books that required drivers of automobiles to call ahead to the town constable. Ostensibly this was so he could warn the horse owners in the city that a motor vehicle was coming into town.
I would like to know exactly how the concept of licensing drivers came about and became accepted in everyday life.
Why didn't the same thing happen with aircraft and boating licenses?
Doug
::Driving is a right not a privilege, at least in the UK it is - although some politicians seem to think the opposite. I've changed the word grant [a licence] to issue. Grant implies it's a privilege. Arcturus 18:25, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  In the United States the operation of a vehicle is treated as a privilege granted by the state that is revocable at any time.  For example, California Vehicle Code Section 14607.4 begins as follows: "The Legislature finds and declares all of the following: (a) Driving a motor vehicle on the public streets and highways is a privilege, not a right." Numerous sections of the California Vehicle Code refer to the "privilege of operating a motor vehicle" — just run a Google search.  --Coolcaesar 02:27, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  For a country that prides itself on being the beacon of democracy in the world, and yet believes that the state grants privileges to the people, is absolutely amazing. Surely it's the other way round. Still, I obviously can't argue with the facts of US law. In the UK, driving certainly isn't defined as a privilege - so far as I know, but as I alluded to earlier, there are plenty of bumptious politicians and other assorted bureaucrats who consider it so. I think the term issue licence covers all eventualities. Arcturus 12:49, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

text: When I was reading the book on Vehicle Traffic Law (which I added a cite for to the MUTCD article) there was some explanation of this.  If I recall correctly, the reason for why it is treated as a privilege is due to some early legal decisions treating gasoline-powered automobiles as a public nuisance because they were noisy and extremely dangerous.  Because states have plenary power to ban public nuisances, the courts reasoned that they could also ban automobiles if they wished.  In turn, automobiles are allowed to operate on the roads only at the pleasure of the state.  That's how we got from the original concept of the right of driving a wagon or stagecoach or riding a horse, etc. to the modern idea of the privilege of operating a motor vehicle.  I forgot to write down the page numbers for that section, though.  --Coolcaesar 19:41, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Driving a car on your own property is a right, hence the reason that a driver's license is not required to drive on your own land (though allowing a small child to do so would probably be considered endangerment). Driving on public roads is generally legally considered a privilege, which is why you need a license (that can be revoked). --SodiumBenzoate 09:15, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

text: This should be mentioned in article, some of this stuff. Also, this article should be expanded to explain whether people who refuse to learn to drive, or never get around to it simply have no viable means of identification. It says that the US has no public ID, but if this is the case, then driving isn't really a right or privilege but something expected or else one becomes an outcast. It also follows that it must be a right, because without which you would be able to give up your license (in the face of rising gas prices, for instance). Bulmabriefs144 (talk) 10:44, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

text: Sounds like the above editor either never studied or flunked U.S. constitutional law.  The states are still sovereign pursuant to the Tenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.  The federal government exerts some jurisdiction through Spending Clause tactics like tying federal aid for highways to compliance with federal standards, but a state can always theoretically break away from the federal transportation regs.  It just has to fund its highway system on its own, that's all.  --Coolcaesar (talk) 11:03, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, the above editor is incorrect about insurance being a maritime contract and requiring a maritime nexus.  I am educated in law and a licensed insurance agent in 49 states, and SOME insurance coverage is marine based, but much is not.  Inland marine coverage is to insure property being transported - that does not mean that auto, homeowners, or umbrella coverage is a marine based coverage.  Also, insurance companies do not require licenses - the law does.  Insurance companies would insure absent a driver's license if state law allowed such.12.109.73.226 (talk) 18:52, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

text: You're confusing property rights with the right to operate a vehicle.  The clause you refer to in Magna Carta governs the right to own a horse or cart, not the right to drive a horse or cart.  Keep in mind that many people frequently drive vehicles they do not own (either rental cars, a friend or relative's vehicle, or their employer's vehicle).  --Coolcaesar (talk) 05:29, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Driving a privilege or a right? 

message: The concept of a "democracy" is a self-governing people. The government isn't some abstract entity, it is the just all the other people in your country. The 13 colonies, in passing the Constitution, established a process of government, which allows the individual to live largely free of other's anti-social behavior. The law defines anti-social behavior. When the automobile came along in the 1900s, the anti-social behavior that arose was leaving the scene of an accident in order to evade responsibility (accountability for damages). Auto accidents brought new types of serious injuries (blindness from shattering glass shards). Driver's licensing grew out of frustration with anonymity on the road, and its undermining of accountability. Would you like to drive in a world where other's could victimize you and your loved ones on the road, without any accountability? Without being able to be identified? On balance, the great majority would rather have accountability than some libertarian distopia where individuals are free to do whatever they want. They want the group to have some reasonable level of control over the individual. Looked at this way, driving an automobile makes sense to treat as a privilege with certain responsibilities toward the welfare of others. If driving were a right (as in "inalienable"), there would be no legal basis for placing driving restrictions on the blind, the severely retarded, those with advanced Alzheimers, 5 year olds, or chronic drunks. Even after a drunk had killed several motorists, what would be the legal basis for taking away driving, if driving were a right?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by PbinCA (talk • contribs) 04:22, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legal foundation for Driving a privilege  

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Drivers License (song) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 14:51, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion in progress