Talk:Star Wars Jedi Knight: Jedi Academy

message: It's funny to see familiar names mentioned in the recent addition by Siegemaster, but I agree with it's removal. Quietmartialartist (talk) 18:19, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amusing 

message: I was looking up Vienna when I came across some useful information on combining pictures into the same "box."
Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg|Human Male
Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg|Human Female
I'm not happy with the way it would look though, compared to the current layout. Does anyone know how to combine the two pictures and keep it on the right as it is currently? Quietmartialartist (talk) 03:33, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Combining two pictures 

message: Great works on these sections, guys. The article is looking much better. Quietmartialartist (talk) 17:14, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks :) I think the Gameplay and Story sections need a bit of work, but this article is pretty close to getting upgraded to B-class. Una LagunaTalk 20:28, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Development and Critical Reception

message: Should another slot be added so that the very eager Diamondback may have have a screenshot of his own in said section? Quietmartialartist (talk) 19:32, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Only one multiplayer screenshot should be in the section, and it shouldn't have any mods or third party features/skins in it so to avoid any confusion. Bill (talk|contribs) 19:59, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Then how do I go about locking it so that Diamondback can no longer revert the image?  Clearly this is an ego thing on his part: first he switched my screenshot with about three different inappropriate versions (i.e. mods, foreign language, etc.), and now he's replacing my screenshot of SJ killing Diamondback with Diamondback killing SJ.  It's not really a "better" image, just one where he is not shown dieing. Quietmartialartist (talk) 21:09, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

text: Furthermore, the picture he is attempting to add now has a model with a modified skin. Quietmartialartist (talk) 21:38, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, Diamond is being more disruptive than anything else. I left a message on their talk page asking him to come here and justify his edits. This whole "replacing X killing Y with Y killing X" business could be resolved by uploading an image of a multiplayer game with bots rather than one with real people. Una LagunaTalk 06:40, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

text: Edit: looking at the edit history of the image, Diamond could be blocked for breaching WP:3RR. Una LagunaTalk 06:44, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed the picture to one with no names but still shows plenty of gameplay elements. Quietmartialartist (talk) 12:42, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, that picture should be fine. Nice, clean and uncluttered. I've expanded the fair use rationale you put there. Una LagunaTalk 17:20, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Multi-Player Section

message: The present lede suggests that That game added third-person viewing to the Quake III engine, but this was in the original engine. Quake III's intro-demo shows in-game footage from a third person perspective. This can be enabled by setting the variable cg_thirdPerson .
Ansbaradigeidfran (talk) 19:54, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quake III Engine modifications 

message: I've recently cleaned up the Single player, Plot and Multiplayer sections and added a bunch more citations. I think we're getting closer to GA quality and we just need a push to get it there. Are there any omissions or details that deserve to be covered in more detail? Any sentences that stand out as wrong or awkward? Anything that still needs a source? Bill (talk|contribs) 14:40, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Getting closer to GA 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Star Wars Jedi Knight: Jedi Academy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090715071210/http://uk.gamespot.com/pc/action/jediacademy/news.html?sid=6073921 to http://uk.gamespot.com/pc/action/jediacademy/news.html?sid=6073921
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://sourceforge.net/projects/jediacademy/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121027093352/http://uk.gamespot.com/star-wars-jedi-knight-jedi-academy/reviews/jedi-knight-jedi-academy-review-6075140/ to http://uk.gamespot.com/star-wars-jedi-knight-jedi-academy/reviews/jedi-knight-jedi-academy-review-6075140/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:05, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Star Wars Jedi Knight: Jedi Academy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://archive.is/20130929114548/http://www.thetigernews.com/news.php?aid=2277&sid=4 to http://www.thetigernews.com/news.php?aid=2277&sid=4
*Added archive https://archive.is/20130123194513/http://uk.gamespot.com/video/914574/6073003/jedi-knight-jedi-academy-developer-interview to http://uk.gamespot.com/video/914574/6073003/jedi-knight-jedi-academy-developer-interview
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081223064059/http://palgn.com.au/article.php?id=288 to http://palgn.com.au/article.php?id=288
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:40, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: It seems really extensive, at least in relation to other game, movie, TV, etc., articles. I feel bad asking if someone's hard work is to be edited down, but it doesn't seem in line with Wikipedia. Charlesmartin82 (talk) 08:12, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh wow somebody has already edited it down quite a lot, I've had an un-refreshed page open in my browser too long, sorry! Charlesmartin82 (talk) 08:14, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: , it could probably still do with some trimming. The recommended length for VG plots is 700 words. Personally, I find that a bit arbitrary, but it's a decent guide. This article is currently 900+, so it should be possible to tighten it. As for undoing or altering other people's work - that's the nature of Wikipedia. Remember, no one will find fault in someone being bold, so feel free to edit as you wish. Bertaut (talk) 02:39, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the plot section too detailed?