Talk:Oxford University Chess Club

message: I have reverted back to the allocated source. If anyone considers  this source is too trvial please raise it here and try to achieve a consensus. BlueValour 19:27, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I think it's unlikely to be controversial, so I didn't remove it, but I am concerned that you need to find better sources.  Sorry, but trivia sites that only include the barest information?  That's not what I would say is a good, reliable source.  I can't even find a description of the person who is responsible for the site's content.  But since you object, I've put it up on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard.  And if you want to reword it to say "they claim to be the oldest" that would make using their own website acceptable.   FrozenPurpleCube 19:43, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, your understanding of the use of  is not correct.  There is no requirement that the information be seriously questioned, and if you check the talk page, there is a person who says it should be used when "This tag should be used for statements and editor either 1)knows to be accurate, but doesn't have a source or 2)doesn't have the knowledge or resources to verify it's factuality, but has no good reason to doubt its accuracy. If an editor comes across a statement they have good reason to think is false, and that statement is unsourced, they should simply remove such a statement not tag it." .  If I did believe it to be false, I'd have removed it.  But I can accept that it is true.  So you just need to look for a better source.    FrozenPurpleCube 19:49, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oldest university chess club in the UK. 

message: I am (re-)adding the  tag as the reliability and independence of a number of sources used in the article was questioned during the article's AfD. Though some of the criticisms can be and were disputed, others are quite straightforward. Even if one were to put aside all of the criticisms raised at the AfD, the references are still incomplete, requiring various pieces of information (e.g., page numbers, access dates) before they can become definitively identified. The type of information required varies with the nature of each reference. For details, please see the various fields of citation templates like  and . A complete citation does not require that every field be filled, but more information is always better.
The  tag serves only to attract attention to the article so that someone may improve it. Its presence does no harm. Please do not remove it without at least partly addressing some of the issues raised. -- Black Falcon (Talk) 00:36, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Refimprove tag 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Oxford University Chess Club. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070609153650/http://msoworld.com/mindzine/news/chess/oxcam/preview.html to http://www.msoworld.com/mindzine/news/chess/oxcam/preview.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://users.ox.ac.uk/~chess/committee.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://users.ox.ac.uk/~chess/committee.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:11, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* Oucc logo.JPG
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:52, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion