Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Post-hardcore/Panic! at the Disco

message: Is Buzznet a good website to get pictures of Panic! for Wikipedia?PrincessOfHearts 20:33, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know, I don't know too much about images. It depends on the licensing of the pics. CattleGirl  talk | sign! 10:33, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Buzznet 

message: I have found a song that Brendon Urie made somewhere around the ages of 14 or 16 (I'm researching) called First Try. I have found lyrics for it,have found videos for it on YouTube, and have actually downloaded the song myself, all I need is to figure out if this is important enough to mention and to get some solid information on his age when he recorded it. Knight Whitefire 04:58, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, if you can find that he definitely wrote it then there's no reason it shouldn't be in the article. CattleGirl  talk 09:40, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Seriousness aside; it's a pretty song. :P Anyway, 14 apparently is the age at which he wrote it. As of now, there's no mention of "First Try" in the Panic at the Disco article or in Brendon Urie's own article, I believe. I think it's notable to mention it as it provides his musical background history. As for the recording itself, ... did he even release the song? (I listened to it on YouTube, but I have no idea how people managed to obtain a (copy of) it.) Qwerty (talk) 11:47, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

text: PATDonline is official and considered more reliable a source than Buzznet. I think it's easier for image attribution/licensing, too. Qwerty (talk) 11:47, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brendon Urie's First Song 

message: Not too sure about whether it's okay, but I've added this project to the above page. Qwerty (talk) 11:34, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Should be fine :) Thanks, CattleGirl  talk 09:40, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Addition to [[:Portal:Music/Connections|Portal:Music/Connections]]

message: Oh noes, what's gone on?
Another thing of note that's happened, "Panic at the Disco"'s a copy-paste job; it hasn't been properly moved. Qwerty (talk) 05:48, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I see. Name change. Page moved properly. Qwerty (talk) 16:36, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "[[Panic! at the Disco]]" v. "[[Panic at the Disco]]"

message: Um, I just spent an hour or so uploading artworks for "I Write Sins Not Tragedies", and I'm not sure if it's okay. They're all up on the page, all in the single infobox. Care to check?
I'm not particularly sure if that's actually allowed; you know, four artworks for one single. I'm fairly sure I've tagged the artworks alright, but if there's any error, please point it out to me on my talk page. Thanks. Qwerty (talk) 16:36, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Album artworks

message: Can we get a user template for us members of Wikiproject Panic at the Disco?--Panic!out (talk) 20:40, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Personally, as small as a li'l template may be; I think the current focus should be the WikiProject itself and contributing to it, rather than, say, parading the fact that we're members of the WikiProject. Of course, this is only my take, and of course, you can make a template for members, if you want and can; or if anyone else wants to make one. Qwerty (talk) 05:56, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Templates 

message: I propose turning this project into a task force of either WikiProject Alternative music, WikiProject Punk music, or WikiProject Emo. The rationales for this are:
#The scope is too narrow to warrant the administrative overhead of a full project. The WikiProject Council guide recommends that if a project might only ever have a few dozen articles and a handful of members, a task force is a much more suitable alternative. The topic of Panic at the Disco has only about a dozen in its scope and isn't likely to ever have more than a few dozen. The project has been inactive for at least 6 months, and many of its members are inactive.
#The task force could benefit from using the parent project's administrative infrastructure, which is already in place. These include assessment scales, categories, etc. After over 2 years the project doesn't even have an assessement scale or the accompanying categories, and it isn't really worth creating them because, again, it's only ever likely to cover a couple dozen articles at best.
#Becoming a task force would encourage members of the parent project to join the task force, thus spurring activity in the most critical area: actual article editing.
In general, full WikiProjects dedicated to a single musical artist/act almost always die of administrative overload. A vast majority of artist-specific Wikiprojects peter out and become inactive; a task force of a larger parent project is a much more suitable means of encouraging editor collaboration around artist-specific article families. Please voice your opinion below, and if there are no objections within a couple of weeks I will go ahead with a task force merger. --IllaZilla (talk) 00:57, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Task force merger