Talk:List of national constitutions

message: Why doesn't the paraguayan constitution appear in this list? --Mauricio Maluff 22:41, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paraguay 

message: A discussion has been started at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Countries/Lists of countries which could affect the inclusion criteria and title of this and other lists of countries.  Editors are invited to participate. Pfainuk talk 13:32, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: New Discussion

message: People keep adding non-sovereign constitutions to the main list:
* State constitution (United States)
* Constitution of Jammu And Kashmir
If there is not already a separate page for it, it might be worth creating one more table for regional sub-national constitutions. In any case, keep your eyes open for non-sovereign bodies on the main list. samwaltz (talk) 12:36, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The United Kingdom didn't exist in 1215.2.101.148.7 (talk) 00:09, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Non-sovereign constitutions

message: While the Canadian constitution was patriated in 1982, it has existed as a written document since 1867 (retitled from the British North America Act, 1867 to the Constitution Act, 1867 by the 1982 Act).  See the article [Constitution of Canada].  
This is also in line with the date of 1900 given for the Australian constitution.  
Ross Fraser (talk) 09:24, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canada's Constitution:  1867, not 1982 

message: I believe it would be helpful to create another column for the original language or languages of the authentic copy of each constitution. តាំង ប៊ុនហុង (talk) 14:25, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Language(s) of each constitution 

message: The country must divided two date are:
# First constitution (date): original constitution [where it was first time created]
# Current constitution (date): valid constitution (original or amendment constitution)
Akuindo (talk) 07:52, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Constitution rule 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of national constitutions. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130723131521/http://mola.gov.om/Nen.pdf to http://mola.gov.om/Nen.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:26, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Why would we list countries without constitutions in a list of national constitutions?  This is completely outside the scope of the article.  ~ GB fan 15:05, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: *If you do not understand the "why" then it is your duty to learn what the meaning is - this is the purpose of Wikipedia. You have no right to destroy knowledge just because you don't understand it. The point is that a common educational technique when teaching a subject is to also teach what it is not. Be careful of your idea about what "scope" means - in this case it does not apply. Thanks. -- DHT863 (talk) 15:18, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I completely understand what scope means in the context of this article.  This is an article about nations that have constitutions not ones that don't.  If you feel we need a list of countries that don't have constitutions, create a new article about that.  ~ GB fan 15:36, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

text: I didn't destroy any information, I removed it from the visible article because it is outside what this article is about (scope definition 1). If you feel the information you are adding here is important then you can create a new article.  It is not my job or responsibility to create an article that you think is important.  ~ GB fan 16:02, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

text: You do not get to dictate to me what my job or responsibilities are, I am a volunteer and get to decide what I do.  No one can tell me what my job or responsibilities are.  Can I explain that definition in my own words, yes I can.  Am I going to do it, no I am not.  You can look at my contributions to see what I do whenever you want.  ~ GB fan 17:14, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I have been informed of what? ~ GB fan 01:38, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Countries without constitutions 

message: Hello, my name is Rebestalic
Should I add a word count column to the existing table for sovereign states? Or is that irrelevant
I'm assuming this talk page is unattended to, so I shall go ahead--I will be checking on this page every now and then for replies.
Rebestalic[dubious—discuss] 11:06, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Word counts 

message: The United States's Constitution is listed as 4,543 words, which is the typical number given by many online sources. This number only includes the original seven articles ratified in 1788. The United States Constitution with all subsequent amendments actually contains 7,762 words, which is also the number given in the cited source at the top of the word count column. I don't know if there's a specific reason for this but I've switched the numbers to make it more accurate, since amendments to the U.S. constitution have the exact same legal status as the original articles.SwensonJ (talk) 19:17, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  U.S. word count 

message: Or the Magna Carta? Yourlocallordandsavior (talk) 21:32, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the 1688 Bill of Rights not a Constitution?