lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Meenachil River

message: I just noticed that there is already an article Meenachil, which discusses the river.  I don't know if the articles should link to each other or be merged.  — Pekinensis 19:22, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meenachil 

message: I earnestly request those who know Malayalam and the actual pronunciation of the river names and other proper names to use diacritical fonts to indicate the length of teh vowels and the quality of the consonants (retroflex n vs. dental n etc). This will help researchers like me who need the precise sounds to investigate the etymology of river names.
Thanks.
perichandra1 02:26, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please use diacritical fonts 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources.  Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  — Diannaa (talk) 11:07, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Miss Chinese International Pageant

message: The tag, having been added by User:Zoe, was removed by User:Sam72991, who has been the principal editor of late on the page, ostensibly because of his disagreement with her having previously edited his work, as expressed here.  Irrespective of the personalities involved, it is plain that the article requires Wikifcation .  I write here only to explain why I am re-adding the tag (lest I should be seen as reverting without explanation) and further to suggest to Sam, inter al., that I cannot imagine that Zoe tagged the article in anything other than good faith (toward which proposition I adduce her continued good work here in cleaning up articles, as well as the fact that the propriety of one's adding the "wikify" tag here is surely beyond dispute) and that, in any case, having an article on which one has worked tagged for "wikification" should not be taken as an insult; at worst, it should be perceived as a challenge (to improve an article, here procedurally--bringing into conformity with accepted Wikipedia guidelines--as opposed to substantively), and, at best, as help from another editor who seeks to improve an article.  The "wikify" tag in no way suggests that an article's subject is non-notable, that an article is poorly written, or that an article, on the whole, doesn't meet Wikipedia's quality standards; the tag, of course, says simply that the layout is inconsistent with the Manual of Style.  Joe 03:46, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "Wikify" tag

message: I've tagged this section with the three tags because it is HUGE and it's pretty hard to digest.  A lot of the information on there is not written to an encyclopedic point-of-view.  The section sounds like a pageant review that comes from an external Pageant page linked at the bottom of the article.
Also this section is so poorly written, grammatically, it's not even funny!  Some people have tried to clean it up already, but it still looks out-of-place with the rest of the article.  If I were to edit this section, I would just probably delete around 80% of the text.  Seeing that I don't have the patience to re-write this section, can someone else deal with this section, please?  Thank you.  smileydude66 00:25, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia/Records section 

message: There are a whole lot of articles that can be created for the different Chinese beauty pageants all around the world that send representatives to Miss Chinese International.  A few have been created (NY, Vancouver, Toronto), but a couple of Google searches return many other pageants around the world.  Search for "Miss Chinatown", and Search for "Miss Chinese".  Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 16:42, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Participating pageants 

message: French Polynesia should be in Oceania, not Europe.
The flag icon for Hong Kong's winner in 1988 should be the Blue Colonial Flag (Hong Kong was still under British rule). Hac129 08:41, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: French Polynesia
Wikipedia talk:Wikiblower protection/Voting

message: According to Wikipedia:Suffrage, "Votes should only very rarely be used to form policy; other means of seeking consensus should be exhausted first. Even policies designed to address disruptive problems on Wikipedia, such as the Three Revert Rule should come to vote only after the terms, condition, start time, and duration of the voting period have been decided by consensus." Because this condition has not been met - and in fact, efforts at voting and deletion began far before the article had a chance to be formed - this Vote is a departure from established Wikipedia policy and is therefore considered performance art. Thank you for your participation. Benjamin Gatti
===Support the policy as a whole===
#Yes - it's more fair than a cabal system of insiders Benjamin Gatti 00:58, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Invalid Vote

message: #Yes - it's more fair than a cabal system of insiders Benjamin Gatti 00:58, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Support the policy as a whole

message: #~~~~ ( ! | ? | * ) 21:25, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Scrap the policy totally

message: ====Support as documentation, oppose as policy====
# Wikipedia needs to acknowledge the complex nature of decision-making, and the important role which occasional unilateralism can play in a consensus-based system. However, I don't really understand what a "policy" on Wikiblower protection would amount to.  Therefore, I suggest that the page be moved to Wikipedia:Whistleblowing or something similar, and reworked. -- Visviva 02:04, 6 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Somewhere in-between (please specify/create suitable voting section)

message: # Wikipedia needs to acknowledge the complex nature of decision-making, and the important role which occasional unilateralism can play in a consensus-based system. However, I don't really understand what a "policy" on Wikiblower protection would amount to.  Therefore, I suggest that the page be moved to Wikipedia:Whistleblowing or something similar, and reworked. -- Visviva 02:04, 6 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Support as documentation, oppose as policy
Talk:Chicoutimi

message: Need a disambiguation page? Chicoutimi was the RCN sub that suffered a 6 Oct 04 fire, in which Lt Chris Saunders was killed.  Trekphiler 01:24, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The second paragraph under History uses the words "city", "municipality", and "town" interchangeably.  Which one is accurate?  Miqrogroove (talk) 18:05, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  History Confusion
Talk:Crater (constellation)

message: In the links to others languges appears 3 times "Portugués". I look for pt and Crater and it seems to be there only one link to the portuguese wiki. Pèrez 20:21, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Links

message: In the Apollo story, the snake is blamed for drinking the water, but the article never says who did (presumably the crow?). And what is the significance of waiting for figs to ripen? Also, if the snake was innocent, why was it punished too? Brutannica (talk) 21:59, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Apollo story
Talk:Benjamin Disraeli

message: The photograph of Prime Minister Distraeli on the main page is identified as a portait:
"Portrait by Cornelius Jabez Hughes, 1878"
However the photograph itself correctly states: 
"Earl of Beaconsfield, K.G. Photographed at Osborne by Command of H.M. The Queen, July 22, 1878 [Benjamin Disraeli (1804–1881)], 1878, Glossy collodion print on card"
It is a photograph. 2001:1C00:1E31:5F00:900D:4CE1:3B74:4276 (talk) 14:22, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it's a photograph. It's also a portrait. It's a photographic portrait. EEng 02:34, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor Error 

message: Hello! I added an image of a chair that Disraeli had made in case of a win in the by election. This is part of a pilot project from the National Trust, further information is here & further images are here Lajmmoore (talk) 18:23, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image of chair
Talk:Delta Zeta

message: I changed a link for the Starky Hearing Foundation that was no longer working. It would be a good idea if there was a wikipedia page for the Starky Hearing Foundation.Thatssosaucy (talk) 22:39, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Starkey_Hearing_Technologies#Starkey_Hearing_Foundation Jax MN (talk) 00:48, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Starky Hearing Foundation 

message: I'm aware that there is an esoteric (hidden) motto known only to initiates.
Recently, someone edited this article by replacing the motto in the infobox:
*From this: "Walk Truly in the Light of the Flame"
*To this: "Love that is ever steadfast." 
Any further edits required?  Is one of these phrases part of the sorority's esoteric material, and therefore ought to be removed?  (I'm not a member.) Or is this one of those situations where one chapter uses a different motto than other chapters?  I'd read that was the situation, in a discussion from ~2007. Jax MN (talk) 16:47, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Honestly, I think the further edit is removal. Both phrases show up as part of the *Creed* https://www.mansfield.edu/greek/mansfield-chapters/delta-zeta.cfm , but neither is listed as the motto.Naraht (talk) 00:28, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  New motto?
Talk:Eugene O'Neill

message: DIDN'T O'NEILL WRITE "THE HOMECOMING,THE HUNTED, THE HAUNTED"?  IF NOT, WHO DID? EPISCOPALIAN (talk) 01:31, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, he did – see Mourning Becomes Electra#Characters and background for more details. ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 18:29, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
Talk:Lyndon B. Johnson/Archive 1

message: "a grand jury was again convened to investigate the [suspicious June 1961 death of top USDA inspector Henry Marshall, who'd been looking too close at Billy Sol Estes]. It concluded murder had been committed and that Johnson, [his DNC man Clifton] Carter and Wallace were the co-conspirators in the murder. Unfortunately, this startling decision by the grand jury was not issued until 1985. Johnson was not charged because he was dead." chapter of Blood, Money, & Power by an attorney who worked for a firm representing LBJ 1966-1971 -- but he needed a better proofreader
----
Johnson's wife is better known as Lady Bird Johnson rather than Claudia Johnson. That is also what the name of the linked article to her is entitled. Any questions? --65.73.0.137
----
There abslutely HAS to be a way to work this into the artice. There just has to. http://americanradioworks.publicradio.org/features/prestapes/audio.php?media=lbj_haggar&start=00:00:01:30.0&end=00:00:02:38.0 (realaudio) --66.66.69.1 01:10, 29 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The Lyndon B. Johnson National Historical Park is worthy of an article, if someone would like to write it. Some starter info here:  (NPS, public domain info) - MPF 10:02, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Article request
Talk:Credentialism

message: Is this topic really large enough for a wikipedia entry, or is it just a word definition? -- User:Tjic
:It doesn't even make sense!  Dell Adams 00:41, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree. I have run into it a few times while looking into various 'schools of thought'  ;)  on educational philosphy, autodidacticism, and homeschooling and it seems to be that it's a significant supporting concept in alternative education.  On the other hand, even if the topic is large enough to be wiki'd, this article itself is still on the puny side. I'll see if the wikəmmunity can build it up a bit. Mang 04:48, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Just a word definition?

message: Credentialism is the bias of over-reliance on credentials regardless of qualification. 
COMMENT: So *some* reliance is okay, but only OVER-reliance is bad? Well, I think we all agree that OVER anything is bad. But so what? Over-eating is bad. Over-reliance on anything is bad by defintion, because that's what we mean by "over". But I think the definition is torpedoed right here. If any reliance is okay, then it mearly devolves into a discussion of how much formal documentation and authentication of qualification (which is all a credential is), is worth. SBHarris 19:17, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: OVER reliance? LOL

message: I suppose I shouldn't be surprised that the dominion of self-described anti-credentialist Jimbo Wales would have such a lopsided, biased article on credentialism.  I'll be back with a big broom to do some major cleanup. Groupthink 13:53, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unfair and imbalanced

message: "Does Education Matter", Alison Wolf,Penguin Books 2002
"The Diploma Disease", Ronald Dore, Publisher ??
I have sensed that Wikipedia has become more credentialist over the years!
Geoff and Majed  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.237.47.51 (talk) 20:42, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing References

message: Precision testing and credentialism are both ways of achieving a certain minimum standard in an occupation or profession.  However, credentialism appends onto precision testing a superfluous checklist. (response to above).  I would assume that many people who oppose credentialism might not oppose the "precision testing" that you mentioned.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.235.209.80 (talk) 23:36, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: response to above

message: It used to be much longer and all the statements were well sourced. Unfortunately, it looks like the credentialists are above criticism and have hijacked this article. 76.120.17.197 (talk) 16:26, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Larger, yes. Well sourced? I can't say I agree. The largest version of this article (before much of it was removed) has one one inline references for the many statements it makes. It's good that it had a solid list of sources at the bottom. But there's no indication which sources provide which of the statements the article makes comes from. So the article reads very non-NPOV or very much like original research. Korval (talk) 00:38, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  What happened to this article?
Talk:Audita tremendi

message: NOTE: check your dates, Jerusalem had not fallen until after the battle of hattim, to be specific hattim occured in july and jerusalem fell on october later that year.
:I know, I guess I didn't explain it clearly enough - I was giving dates relative to the date of the bull. It was issued months after Hattin, of course, but the fall of Jerusalem was earlier in October (as the bull was issued at the end of October), and that news had not yet reached Europe. Sorry if it's confusing...I'll try to fix it. Adam Bishop 05:36, 6 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Well it's just the first two words, which is how bulls are usually known, so it doesn't really make any grammatical sense...the first sort of whole phrase is "Audita tremendi severitate judicii, quod super terram Jerusalem divina manus exercuit", which is something like "with the severity of terrifying judgement, which the divine hand exercised over the land of Jerusalem, having been heard..."  Adam Bishop 05:49, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I found Jonathan Riley-Smith's translation of that bit, and added it...I like my translation better, but oh well :) Adam Bishop 07:10, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:List of Xiaolin Showdown episodes

message: Should we record the martial arts moves? OmiTown, for example, has: snake chasing doggie (?), Cow sucking cheese, Pig eating sausage, Horse stealing crud (?), Goat churning butter, Monkey stinking house.
:There's too many and don't really hold any importance to anything.
::Martial arts moves are not associated with particular episodes, so putting them in the episode list doesn't really make sense. Jay32183 (talk) 05:29, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Martial arts moves 

message: The redirect Bird of Paradise(Xiaolin Showdown) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Gonnym (talk) 23:09, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Bird of Paradise(Xiaolin Showdown)]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect Dangerous Minds(Xiaolin Showdown) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Gonnym (talk) 23:09, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Dangerous Minds(Xiaolin Showdown)]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect The Life and Times of Hannibal Roy Bean(Xiaolin Showdown) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Gonnym (talk) 23:09, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:The Life and Times of Hannibal Roy Bean(Xiaolin Showdown)]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Inspectah Deck

message: Inspectah Deck doesn't Rap on Got My Mind Made Up.  He only says one line, which might be a sample, also I don't even know why they sampled him, he wasn't on the track at all.--Tainted Drifter 20:14, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Got My Mind Made Up 

message: In all the Wu-Tang-clan music Videos, his name appears as Inspektah Deck, so i think saying inspectah Deck is misleading to persons who read the page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.50.127.76 (talk) 20:58, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: I think this should be changed to Staten Island, NY. If it said "Place of Birth", then maybe Bronx, NY would be accurate. However, "origin" implies the origin of the rapper, and he certainly grew up in, and hails from, Staten Island, NY.67.244.17.151 (talk) 14:28, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed and changed - the infobox now says he was born in the Bronx, but lists his origin as Staten Island, as he moved there when he was 12 and generally identifies with Staten Island as the article indicates.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.166.193.110 (talk) 11:22, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin: Bronx, NY 

message: Shouldn't Czarface be a separate article? I think that they're officially a group and they've already released two well-received albums Tashi Talk to me 19:10, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree a separate article is warranted... no time to do it myself, at least not properly. The article existing at Czarface would need to be moved to Czarface (album) and most inbound links would need to be altered. Antepenultimate (talk) 01:25, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  FYI, Czarface and Czarface are now separate articles. If you could help make sure any references to the group or to the album are logical and grammatical, beyond just the links, that'd be great. It's been a lot of work. Thanks! JesseRafe (talk) 21:21, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Nice work , it's certainly a deserving topic and the arrangement of articles makes a lot more sense now. Thanks! Antepenultimate (talk) 23:57, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Czarface
Talk:Bảo Long

message: Should he really be called a "pretender", since according to the article he didn't support a restoration of the monarchy? 24.69.174.26 (talk) 14:53, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pretender? 
Talk:Iraqi civil war (2006–2008)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. Ambiguity demonstrated, no WP:PRIMARYTOPIC argument made (closed by non-admin page mover) BilledMammal (talk) 12:25, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose best to keep the dab page as primary. estar8806 (talk) ★ 01:19, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 29 July 2023
Talk:Michael Slote

message: Would someone please WP:CITE source(s) for this article, specifically the claim that "He is widely recognized as a leading figure in the recently renewed field of virtue ethics"?  Hall Monitor 21:23, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I believe Slote to be a pompous fool whose best contribution to the field of Ethics was 'let's change the names of virtues, for some reason. Oh, huzzah, aren't I spiffy?' What a joke.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.163.177.244 (talk) 12:01, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: On the Contrary

message: I have commenced a tidy-up of the Bibliography section using cite templates. Capitalization and punctuation follow standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, as much as Wikipedia templates allow it. Feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 06:17, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography
Talk:Saturn Bomberman

message: Did anyone ever play this game with 10 players? --Abdull 21:31, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, on a projector. It works perfectly. It is pretty cool, but I'm not sure I'd want to do it on anything but a giant TV/a projector. 87.56.8.96 15:17, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Who is Miss Honey? --Abdull 23:37, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Miss Honey seems to be the mascot of Hudson's Hyper Fun Club as you can see on this scan: . Unfortunately the website http://honey.hudson.co.jp seems to be defunct. --Abdull 12:45, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uknown character 

message: What the question above says. Usually the in-game creatures are known as Louies, is this game any different? Overlord11001001 18:11, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dinosaurs..... or Louies? 

message: Namcokid47 may have a point about the negative side being overemphasized, but "The game was acclaimed for its enjoyable gameplay and multiplayer, though some felt it didn't advance the series as much as earlier installments." is self-contradicting, since "acclaimed" is traditionally used to mean "uniformly praised". Also, the second half of the sentence is simply incorrect. Critics (even the ones who positively reviewed the game) weren't saying "Saturn Bomberman has so many innovative and game-changing advances for the series, but not as many as previous installments."; they were saying that previous installments did almost nothing to change up the formula and Saturn Bomberman is no different in that regard.--Martin IIIa (talk) 15:07, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reviews