Talk:Simeon Solomon

message: Is there a reason his sexual orientation is so promintly emphesized in the opening paragraph? Is he known as being a homosexual first, painter second? Stbalbach 00:02, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I agree - the man is famous (and in Wikipedia) for his painting, not his sex life.
:For many people who may be interested in the history and culture of homosexuality, that may be the only reason they know about him.  --Kstern999 16:47, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Homosexual' painter? 

message: The reference to his sex live needs to be put in context. Was he known to be gay at the time? Was it a scandal? Was it revolutionary? There has to be somthing to say about it. Otherwise being gay is not why hes encyclopedic, its trivial.  Stbalbach 02:50, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: As the creator of the article I have no dispute over the removal of the respective content mentioned above, I thought I had better explain why it was there in the first place however.  I started this article because it turned up as a red link when I added his misdemeanour to Gay cruising in the United Kingdom, I therefore arrived at the subject with little prior knowledge except what had been gleaned by google seraches and a heavy gay bias.  It can be said though that his court appearance was quite scandalous at the time, hence his escape to France. -- Francs2000 | Talk  10:40, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gay reference 

message: Moreover, it can be argued that Solomon's outing as a gay man certainly did affect the reception, reputation and distribution of his work, and is relevant for that reason.
User Calibanu 15:03, 26 April 2006
:Being arrested certainly affected his life and career, and the causes of the arrest are relevant. --Kstern999 16:45, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Later Work

message: SatyrTN removed several items from this entry that should probably remain (or at least their removal should be explained more fully than a simple "rm trivia".  Why are these "trivia"? By what criteria did you make this "judgment call"?).  For an artist as obscure as Simeon Solomon, any links and references that will allow him to be more adequately considered are important, I feel, to retain -- especially a scholarly volume that reproduces a number of his artworks, several of which are unavailable online anywhere (Kaylor, pgs. 80, 217, 218, 223, 378, and 392), as well as mentions/considers Simeon Solomon on 41 occasions (I just did a word search of the online PDF of the book). Welland R 07:40, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Restored materials

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Simeon Solomon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070212022741/http://www.glbtq.com/arts/solomon_s.html to http://www.glbtq.com/arts/solomon_s.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:33, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The list seems excessive and out-of-pro. There are Wiki pages on painters much better-known than him, that don't feature the exhibitions at anything like this length. Valetude (talk) 13:26, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Exhibitions