Talk:Tanushree Dutta

message: Should have a downfall section.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.99.176.110 (talk) 08:52, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Downfall Section

message: Trivia section removed as it was only gossip and rumors.
No, Unreferenced fact remaining do removing unreferenced tag.
Some pictures could help to make the article better.
Mayank Abhishek 12:02, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing Trivia 

message: new up comming movie is rama the saviour  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Khadangasandeep (talk • contribs) 03:24, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tanushree Dutta  

message: Could someone please write her name in Hindi in the beginning of the article and put it before the Bengali name? She is a Hindi speaker and probably uses it first. 20:25, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name written in Hindi script? 

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant 
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 15:44, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Thanusree.jpg Nominated for Deletion

message: ===Reasons why the Gal Gadot entry needs to be deleted===
* There were seventy eight other contestants in the 2004 Miss Universe  pageant. Surely, the others deserve a mention too, but why on Tanushree's page 
* That Gadot  became famous later as Wonder Woman is still no reason for her to figure on Tanushree's page
===Earlier Discussion on the subject===
I don't see how information about Gal Gadot improves this article. It's at best celebrity gossip. And despite the sources' wording I seriously doubt Gadot "lost to Tanushree Dutta". Both competed in the same pageant, Gadot did worse, but unless this pageant was organized differently from any other I've ever heard of, it was not a direct competition. So Gadot "lost to" (did worse than) a bunch of people which included Dutta; she did not lose specifically to her. 
At a closer look, I doubt "8th runner up", too. That seems to be based on nothing but the ordering of the top ten in our own article on the Miss Universe 2004 pageant (compare the Twitter images in the sources ), which happens to be alphabetic by country for the people from 6 to 10 and again from 11 to 15. That same "alphabetic by country" order is found in our articles on the 2005 and 2006 pageants. The statistical chance that three years in a row the places 6-10 and 11-15 were each awarded in that alphabetical order is... negligible. So we can conclude that our article likely doesn't give "6th runner up" to "15th runner up" in any order imposed by the pageant (it also doesn't cite any sources for the order of those places). Searches on Google and Google News found an "8th runner up" only in connection with the "Dutta did better than Gal Gadot" buzz, basically the above, nothing from 2004. So we seem to be engaged in circular referencing here, with the news sources falsely believing that the order of names in our own article gives the order at the pageant.
For these reasons I'll remove both the Gal Gadot stuff and the "8th runner up" again. Huon (talk) 17:09, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why does Gal Gadot have to figure on a page about Tanushree Dutta ?  

message: I don't see how information about Gal Gadot improves this article. It's at best celebrity gossip. And despite the sources' wording I seriously doubt Gadot "lost to Tanushree Dutta". Both competed in the same pageant, Gadot did worse, but unless this pageant was organized differently from any other I've ever heard of, it was not a direct competition. So Gadot "lost to" (did worse than) a bunch of people which included Dutta; she did not lose specifically to her. 
At a closer look, I doubt "8th runner up", too. That seems to be based on nothing but the ordering of the top ten in our own article on the Miss Universe 2004 pageant (compare the Twitter images in the sources ), which happens to be alphabetic by country for the people from 6 to 10 and again from 11 to 15. That same "alphabetic by country" order is found in our articles on the 2005 and 2006 pageants. The statistical chance that three years in a row the places 6-10 and 11-15 were each awarded in that alphabetical order is... negligible. So we can conclude that our article likely doesn't give "6th runner up" to "15th runner up" in any order imposed by the pageant (it also doesn't cite any sources for the order of those places). Searches on Google and Google News found an "8th runner up" only in connection with the "Dutta did better than Gal Gadot" buzz, basically the above, nothing from 2004. So we seem to be engaged in circular referencing here, with the news sources falsely believing that the order of names in our own article gives the order at the pageant.
For these reasons I'll remove both the Gal Gadot stuff and the "8th runner up" again. Huon (talk) 17:09, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Earlier Discussion on the subject

message: This  was reverted because it was not sourced. But the more serious issue is that it was copied from here (literally cut and paste) https://newkok18.blogspot.com/2015/09/tanushree-dutta-image-gallery-with-Full-biography.html Thanks Acharya63 (talk) 02:51, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  plagiarism 

message: Rakhi Sawant had accuses Tanushree Dutta of raping her multiple times, twelve years ago. https://www.indiatoday.in/movies/celebrities/story/tanushree-dutta-blasts-rakhi-sawant-not-drug-addict-definitely-not-lesbian-1376309-2018-10-26 TanushreeD (talk) 18:39, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the  template. There are concerns of WP:UNDUE here. not everything that is printed can automatically find its way into the wikipedia article.  DBigXrayᗙ 19:13, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 27 October 2018 

message: You have been consistently redacting content from this page for varying reasons, without explaining why those reasons apply. I have reverted those edits due to them not seeming constructive to the article. At that point, you would be expected to follow the Bold-Revert-Discuss cycle, but instead you resorted to edit warring. In the process, your edit warring broke the article.
A report has been made to WP:AN/3 due to your behavior. However, I am willing to discuss here why you think the information in the article is inaccurate, in order to avoid having to have an administrator block you.
Please respond here instead of continuing your disruptive behavior.
Kirbanzo (talk) 20:29, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dispute resolution