lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Contracture

message: The "See also" section, while informative, appears to have been written in a promotional style. At best, the author may simply be a sincere advocate of an exciting new technology. Such an author should certainly feel free to point out the benefits of the technology, but these benefits should be labeled as "perceived benefits of technique" or something that indicates that the section consists largely of opinion. At worst, the repeated references to Flex Technology may have been inserted with an eye toward search engine optimization. It is not clear why it is relevant that the product is made in the USA, nor why one brand of the product is repeatedly mentioned without comparison to any other brands. Wikipedia is not an appropriate outlet for this kind of advertising.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Invisible Flying Mangoes (talk • contribs) 09:46, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV promotion of Flex Technology 

message: According to this website and some other research, serial casting is a possible non-surgical treatment for children.  I'm not sure about adults.  http://www.sjbhealth.org/body_childrens.cfm?id=101271.179.3.224 (talk) 14:54, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Serial Casting 

message: I found this entry asserting that once contracture is taking place, surgery was the only intervention, but this is not true. I don't know enough about this to fix it beyond what I've done, but I know that there's a lot of work being done with yoga, for example, with people with cerebral palsy. (I also know that there's a significant difference between just PULLING on a hypertonic contracture and actually releasing it; can others fill in a bit more?) Here are a few refs that may be starting places: 
Light KE, Nuzik S, Personius W, Barstrom A (1984) Low-load prolonged stretch
vs. high-load brief stretch in treating knee contractures. Phys Ther 64: 330-
333.
Tanigawa MC (1972) Comparison of the hold-relax procedure and passive
mobilization on increasing muscle length. Phys Ther 52: 725-735.
Nambi, Gopal S., and Amisha Atul Kumar Shah. "Additional effect of iyengar yoga and EMG biofeedback on pain and functional disability in chronic unilateral knee osteoarthritis." International Journal of Yoga 6.2 (2013): 123.
DiBenedetto, Margarete, et al. "Effect of a gentle Iyengar yoga program on gait in the elderly: an exploratory study." Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 86.9 (2005): 1830-1837.
10.1016/j.apmr.2005.03.011  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kvcad (talk • contribs) 02:42, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-surgical interventions
Talk:VisitScotland

message: I've reduced the amount of external links per WP:SPAM- I think the main site is enough for such a small article. Thunderwing 15:48, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: External links

message: Why are only two other branch offices than Edinburgh mentioned? I would consider the 100 tourist information centres that they run as branch offices? Or am I misunderstanding the phrase. Skarfy (talk) 21:20, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Branch Offices

message: In this series of edits, a user claiming to represent the subject made a significant number of changes to the content. I have reverted those changes. On the basis that:
* WP:COIEDIT expects that, except for minor fixes or non-material edits, editors with a conflict of interest should raise the proposed changes on a talk page (like this one). For comment from uninvolved editors. Before those changes are then applied.
* MOS:PERSON expects that, except in quotes or similar, first person pronouns should not be used. Statements about "our renowned beautiful scenery" or "our whiskies famous across the globe" or "our cultural traditions, captivating myths, stories and legends" are completely inappropriate. Wikipedia doesn't have "beautiful scenery". So the term "our" here is completely inappropriate.
* WP:NOTPROMO expects that tone be balanced and non-promotional. So, even if (for example) the above were reworded to remove the use of the term "our", the promotional tone above (renowned, beautiful, famous, captivating, etc) and elsewhere is not in keeping with guidelines.
* WP:COPYVIO expects that copyrighted material not be used on the project. Almost all of the problematic text is a verbatim copy and paste of text from visitscotland.org. Where it is published under a copyrighted licence claim of "© 2019 VisitScotland. All Rights Reserved". Copyrighted and "all rights reserved" content is, by definition, not compatible with the Creative Commons licences used here.
Unless/until these issues can be addressed, the proposed content cannot be added. And, even then, not in its proposed form. Guliolopez (talk) 14:41, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: COI/COPYVIO/TONE/PERSON
Talk:Acronym plurals

message: As for the New York times, their rule about acronym apostrophes is from when they did headlines in all-caps(because DVDS OUTSELLING CDS would look weird). They've stopped that, and have since decried this silliness. No-where else have I seen it suggested that DVD's, CD's, etc is correct.Cantras 15:49, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Nonvolatile BIOS memory

message: You can't call it "CMOS" memory and call it "non-volatile" at the same time.  Remove power to CMOS circuitry and it loses its initial information, usually in a matter of seconds.    Battery backup is not the same as NonVolatile memory.  Consider FLASH or EPROM or EEPROM or PROM or other forms of memory that are much less volatile.  Given time, ALL memory is volatile! --71.10.146.139 (talk) 23:59, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article contradition

message: CMOS memory can't simply be replaced with flash mem or EEPROM, because the latter are written in a different way. Since CMOS data is to be written byte for byte it's still working. However, there are certain extensions (ESCD for PCI, proprietary data, sometimes BIOS password - esp. in Notebooks) that are stored in BIOS flash (in a reserved area). But the CMOS RAM is still there. --Zac67 08:26, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replaced by Flash? 

message: Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't CMOS volatile memory? Since it requires a battery to maintain the data, it's volatile, like RAM. Non-volatile memory maintains the data stored in it, even when powered off (e.g. flash memory, EEPROM). It functions like non-volatile memory, since it's always powered (if the battery has power), but it's actually volatile memory.
85.76.253.210 (talk) 16:05, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Strictly speaking maybe that is correct but everyone refers to this as nvram.  It is nonvolatile in the sense that the memory contents persist when you unplug the computer. 207.241.238.217 (talk) 22:02, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, CMOS RAM is RAM...! "CMOS" stands for "complementary metal–oxide–semiconductor" - a way to build chips with low static power consumption, and, as you both have realized, an ordinary static RAM chip may become non-volatile with the help of some circuitry and a backup battery. HenkeB (talk) 01:45, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-volatile? 

message: This article doesn't really say much, if anything, about the CMOS setup "application" built into most BIOS firmware. This should either have a section in the page or its own article, as it's certainly notable enough. flarn2006 [u t c] time: 23:25, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why does [[CMOS Setup]] redirect here? 

message: * Seems like it should be an article on BIOS memory as it tries to cover both non-volatile and CMOS systems. Currently seems to conflate the two without a clear understanding of the how both are used in a modern computer. 
* Doesn't explain the history of BIOS memory well.  
* Spends an inordinate amount of time on battery types. 
* Riddled with inaccuracies.
smnc (talk) 18:56, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs total re-write
Talk:Okahumpka, Florida

message: From a Goodreads review of "Beneath a Ruthless Sun":
In this backwater Florida town of Okahumpka a racist sheriff is king [1957]. Swaggering, mean-spirited and hateful Sheriff McCall is the embodiment of bigotry at its ugliest. In contrast a committed, relentless and civil rights minded female reporter never stops trying to right a grim wrong. Naturally, the KKK terrorizes her but is unable to prevent her from pursuing her cause.
188.154.206.128 (talk) 11:42, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Okahumpka in the news
Talk:Viyella

message: with a highly successful advertising campaign featuring the work of Nottingham artist Miney Todd, a campaign that also cemented Todd's reputation of one of Britain's top illustrators
Who? Can't find a published source for this, either of the connection with Viyella or of such a reputation for an artist of this name. Tearlach 16:01, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Miney Todd

message: UK, China, ...?andycjp (talk) 11:09, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Location of manufacturing?
Talk:Hybrid functional

message: Are there semiempirical hybrid functionals?  Having just written the article and looked in the Gaussian manual list, I'm not so sure.  Maybe it doesn't make sense since you set the parameters in an empirical sense.  WilliamDParker 16:03, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Having recently reviewed some of Perdew's articles  , it turns out that LYP correlation is empirical in that it is fit with four parameters, and any mixing of Hartree-Fock exchange with more than one paramters is semiempirical because it is fit to some set of experimental outcomes WilliamDParker 20:17, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

text: Continuing on this, remember Adamo and Barone implemented the Purdue NON-empirical formulation as the 'B1LYP' functional in Chem Phys Lett. 274 (1997). . This is available in Both Gaussian and Neese's ORCA, as well as many other packages.RabidDutchman (talk) 11:30, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Semiempirical hybrids?

message: Hi ! I would like to signale that I have written a version of hybrid functional in french that is more complete and detailed than this english version. Maybe kind translators can use it to improve the page. Faithfully yours, Grimlock (talk) 14:07, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  French version
Talk:Mario Vázquez Raña

message: It is currently unclear whether this person is notable enough for an article on Wikipedia, since no secondary sources are cited. By the notability criteria for biographies, independent reliable sources are required to make sure that the subject is notable. These sources might be, for example, significant press coverage about the person (about him, not about his employer or organization), or an independent biography. 
It may well be possible that such sources exist, in view of the positions he held. However, currently no such sources are  cited in the article. Please add such sources to establish notability.
For the time being, I am replacing the “importance” tag with “notability”. Sorted as part of the Notability wikiproject. --B. Wolterding 08:09, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  notability 

message: This is too defamatory to keep with out a citation:
"His several years of administration have been a synonim of corruption, inefficiency and no development for Mexican sports." added by  user:189.138.84.96
(It's also misspelled.) RJFJR (talk) 19:20, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  defamatory statement without citation 
Template talk:R from year

message: ;The below will show the pipetricks applied... :to sort to the category . Asserting the parameter 'test' as TRUE, bypassed normal output, and prevents actual categorization.
* 
* :Category: Redirects from year format
===Test with 'test' FALSE===
*    -- 
----
*    -- 
===Test with 'test' TRUE (Defined)===
*    -- 
*    -- 
*    -- 
*    -- 
*    -- 
*    -- 
*    -- 
*    -- 
*    -- 
Conclude tests all satisfactory // FrankB 16:52, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Tests of template

message: *    -- 
*    -- 
*    -- 
*    -- 
*    -- 
*    -- 
*    -- 
*    -- 
*    -- 
Conclude tests all satisfactory // FrankB 16:52, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Test with 'test' TRUE (Defined)

message: Why does this template add the year category? It leads to lots of confusing double listings like in :Category:90 where 90 AD and 90 go to the same article. PrimeHunter (talk) 00:54, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems a bad idea, the template is painfully complicated for a simple, somewhat vague task.  Rich Farmbrough, 19:51, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why add year category?
Talk:Coppin State University

message: I contextualized the article's claim that Coppin has a low graduation and retention rate, and changed the title of this section to reflect further forthcoming information, such as the fact that Coppin also has the second highest NEH grant application rate in the State of Maryland, ahead of Morgan and every other Maryland institution except College Park. As I do not have my reference handy, I'm not changing the article yet. But I will add this material shortly, along with other surprising facts about Coppin State.--BenJonson (talk) 18:47, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Getting Started 

message: Should there be a section on Greek life? -- 24.167.173.95 (talk) 04:33, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greek life 
Talk:Pipefitter

message: That is obsurd, that would be the same as merging fireman and water.Usabas1 16:18, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Concur - I'll remove the tags. Addhoc 15:35, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: Presumably this country refers to the US.  This and the references to states requiring differing qualifications need to be expanded to other countries.  Rojomoke (talk) 11:54, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Globalize
Talk:World aeronautical chart

message: Because of being lack of detailed information, World Aeronautical Charts are not recommended for exclusive use by pilots of low speed, low altitude aircraft. WAC is not used for VFR flight. For VFR flight, pilots mainly use Sectional Charts and Terminal Charts.
--Natasha2006 15:51, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WAC is not used for VFR
Talk:One-to-one computing

message: List of possible sources
This list and layout was compiled in 2007: so before the iPads and Chromebooks phases. Yoasties (talk) 20:20, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

message: I Want To Study True Green Anarchy.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:E000:7C02:EC00:68E0:2D90:AC35:1EAD (talk) 02:48, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is It Correct? 

message: It seems to me that this article repeatedly violates Wikipedia's manual of style, so I've added the cleanup rewrite template. I apologize if this article does not need cleanup.
CampWood (talk) 23:19, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup tag 

message: About the https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:BURL&redirect=no and rot links , There are certain references from research papers that need rearrangement. SerhatSinan (talk) 04:56, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bare URL
Talk:Masakatsu Aoki

message: The guidelines for notability state: "The person has made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in his or her specific field."  In the specific field of astronomy, this astronomer has discovered several asteroids and supernovae, and these discoveries are now in the permanent astronomical record (journals and the IAU's Minor Planet Center asteroid lists). Isn't that enough to meet the criterion? Urhixidur (talk) 19:42, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Regarding the proposed deletion for "lack of notability"

message: This AFD should have been relisted (or re-relisted) to gain community consensus on the matter.  Given the limited discussion I think I will be relisting this in a shorter period of time than usual.  JBsupreme (talk) 21:13, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion discussion should not have been closed
Talk:Mashur Abdallah Muqbil Ahmed Al Sabri

message: These links to the page numbers within the OARDEC documents may be useful to other contributors.  Geo Swan (talk) 21:35, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  rough work 
Talk:Massimo Colomba

message: anyone sure on who he played for at youth level? Dribblingscribe (talk) 19:28, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Massimo Morante

message: ==Untitled==
this article needs to be soured think youOo7565 06:02, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the tag.  The article is exactly 3 sentences long.  Nothing is claimed in those sentences that cannot be easily verified by clicking on the provided imdb link.-Hal Raglan (talk) 02:17, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: why tag was added

message: this article needs to be soured think youOo7565 06:02, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the tag.  The article is exactly 3 sentences long.  Nothing is claimed in those sentences that cannot be easily verified by clicking on the provided imdb link.-Hal Raglan (talk) 02:17, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tampa, Kansas

message: Please review the following:
# Please follow the Wikipedia USCITY guideline for layout and content.
# Please document your source by citing a reference to prove your text is verifiable.
# Please add text that has a neutral point of view instead of sounding like an advertisement.
# Please ensure a person meets Wikipedia Notability requirements before adding to the "Notable People" section.
# Please read the "Editing, Creating, and Maintaining Articles" chapter from the book Wikipedia : The Missing Manual, .
• Sbmeirow • Talk •  15:21, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important Tips Before Editing This Article 
Talk:Mat Johnson

message: Clear assertion of notability--winner of literary prize. DGG 13:15, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Evraz

message: EVRAZ SHOULD HAVE HEADQUARTERS IN MOSCOW. NOW IT IS A BRITISH COMPANY WITH HEADQUARTERS IN LONDON--83.33.102.139 (talk) 02:22, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

message: ...can be found on http://www.evraz.com/products/. No cold rolled sheets. --Schwobator (talk) 13:17, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Products... 
Talk:Mathew Moolakkatt

message: Note that the spelling of his name is different in Official catholic source. It should probably be moved to "Mathew Moolakkatt". Student7 (talk) 23:27, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling of name
Talk:Ramona, Kansas

message: Please review the following:
# Please follow the Wikipedia USCITY guideline for layout and content.
# Please document your source by citing a reference to prove your text is verifiable.
# Please add text that has a neutral point of view instead of sounding like an advertisement.
# Please ensure a person meets Wikipedia Notability requirements before adding to the "Notable People" section.
# Please read the "Editing, Creating, and Maintaining Articles" chapter from the book Wikipedia : The Missing Manual, .
• Sbmeirow • Talk •  15:21, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important Tips Before Editing This Article 
Talk:Office of Special Investigations (United States Department of Justice)

message: "Conspiracy? The CIA and the Nazis" produced by Towers Productions, Inc. for the History Channel, copyright 2004 A&E Television Networks might serve as a possible reference for those seeking to expand this article. Official site. Youtube. Squideshi (talk) 20:10, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible Reference

message: This article has been reverted by a bot to  as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) This has been done to remove User:Accotink2's contributions as they have a history of extensive copyright violation and so it is assumed that all of their major contributions are copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. VWBot (talk) 13:25, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright problem

message: The article was revised to address concerns about 1) perceived lack of a neutral point of view 2) factual accuracy (possibly compromised due to out-of-date information as of December 2009 and 3) perceived over-reliance upon primary sources as of May 2009. Some new content was added and some old content retained. With this revision the following templates were removed:
: multiple issues
: Update|inaccurate=y|date=December 2009
: primary sources|date=May 2009
Bryantbob (talk) 03:29, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Revision to address concerns and remove templates
Talk:Matiur Rehman

message: I feel to improve this article more information, an information box and a picture of Matiur Rehman is required.  I searched flickr for "Matiur Rehman" and no results were found.  Feedback would be appreciated. Adamdaley (talk) 23:07, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Improvement 
Talk:BN-600 reactor

message: "Japan has paid 1 billion for the technical documentation on the reactor in Beloyarsk"
-- Yen or dollar?
219.8.92.78 16:33, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Possibly rubles? Anyway, a lot of information on this reactor (and all others) is available in the World Nuclear Association webpage: http://www.world-nuclear.org Q43 (talk) 20:07, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

message: Significant parts of this article are lifted almost verbatim from  173.189.175.80 (talk) 06:21, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright 

message: According to  it was only operation until 2005. The article states it was modified in 2012. I do not understand. --Ysangkok (talk) 10:36, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-operational from 2005? 

message: The BN-600 belongs to the second generation of nuclear power units and its 30-year design lifetime expired in April 2010. (which was extended to 2025) - page 363 of OPERATING EXPERIENCE WITH THE BN-600 SODIUM COOLED FAST REACTOR; by M.V. BAKANOV, YU.V. NOSOV, O.A. POTAPOV, Beloyarsk Nuclear Power Plant, Zarechny, Russian Federation; in: Fast Reactors and Related Fuel Cycles: Safe Technologies and Sustainable Scenarios - FR13 - Proceedings of an International Conference, Paris, France, 4–7 March 2013. --User:Haraldmmueller 11:34, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  BN-600 is a "Generation II" reactor, not Gen IV