lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Pushtimarg

message: Could we seriously have a complete rewrite here? In my mind, an article should only even be good enough to attempt a good article review on if a reader who knows nothing about its subject can go in, read it, and come out with a bit more of an understanding. Right now, I just removed a whole bunch of spam that has been on this article for months. We need better references, a better format, etc. ViperSnake151 18:09, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: One more messed up article. :( -Nizil (talk) 12:56, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, tagged for 10+ years, much of it worthy of WP:TNT. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 14:44, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

text: It is Sanskrit, derived from Pusha (पुष), which connotes "nourishing, flourishing, cherishing". See (p. 587, col. 3), also see puSa. We need to mention the significance of grace to Pushtimargis, which I will do in the next few edits. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 19:01, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: That is good explanation. There is also a Gujarati term Poshan which means nourish probably derived from Pusha. Your article improvements are awesome.-Nizil (talk) 06:11, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Okay, this article is a mess
Category talk:Wikipedians in Vientiane

message: Would you please help put this text  into the organization name on the article Scouting in Laos? I am just guessing with ສກຖຈາລ as the transliteration, I honestly don't know and need help before the rabid deletionists remove the image this week. Thanks Chris 02:04, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: language request
Category talk:Wikipedians in Laos

message: Would you please help put this text  into the organization name on the article Scouting in Laos? I am just guessing with ສກຖຈາລ as the transliteration, I honestly don't know and need help before the rabid deletionists remove the image this week. Thanks Chris 02:04, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: language request
Talk:Hancock Manor

message: Can we change this inflated title for the Thomas Hancock House (it's not tMassachusetts' only Hancock House), one that exists only in a world where "manor" has no significance other than "grand"? The house is no more a manor than it is a "stately manse". --Wetman 07:15, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If it's sourced, why not? But I would first like to see a source calling it that, and articles on other Hancock Houses in MA. I know there are sources for "Hancock House" and "Hancock Mansion", so alternatively, go ahead and move it to those if you wish. Biruitorul 22:22, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name

message: This article has greatly improved in a short period of time - great work! Can I recommend, however, breaking the text into sections for easy skimming? --Midnightdreary 05:02, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sections

message: Well-done article.  But for the nth time on Wikipedia, the very thing I need to know, the very reason I consulted this article, is unanswered, and it fails.
At the risk of being pathetically obvious, give us a map showing the house's location today, and how it relates to the present addresses on Beacon St.
Jimlue (talk) 05:35, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Map
Talk:Romano-Germanic culture/Arc1

message: There are still a number of problems with this article. I will begin with the big one. What does Romano German mean? 
* Is Romano supposed to be an adjective modifying the noun German? (That would be weird.)
* Is Romano German supposed to be an adjective (in which case it should probably be hyphenated Romano-German)? 
* Is this an article about a culture? Then call it Romano-German culture. 
* Is it about Germany under Roman rule? Then call it Roman Germany, maybe. (See Roman Britain.) [P.S. Wikipedia already has that article; it's called Germania. Rob C (Alarob) 23:30, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Romano German" means what? 

message: The point is exactly the same as the point is for Romano British, and Roman Gaul, its to describe the effect Rome had on Germanic peoples, especially after the fall of Rome, when there were mass migrations of Germans into es Roman lands. Also its an article on the culture of the Holy Roman Empire, why they considered themselves Romans(Obviously because of Duel Roman German ancestry). there are all these pointless citations through out the article also. I cant understand why, all these things are basically pretty much common sense. --ProfMozart 03:00, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They are not "common sense." They are in fact contradicted by other, much better articles in Wikipedia. If you will keep insisting that Empress Irene tried to marry Charlemagne but was rebuffed, you will have to come up with a reliable source. You have not done this. If you don't do it soon, I will move to have this article deleted. -- Rob C (Alarob) 22:19, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Point 

message: Ok Rob so your saying there needs to be a citation after "After the fall of Rome in 476 ad"? or another citation after "Pope Leo crowning charlemange as emperor"? ok, then who did?? everyone knows Pope Leo did. come on all those citations are bogus, you know the Western empire fell in 476, so why the citation? thats why I take it as a personal attack cause you are citating common knowledge, sorry to keep saying it but you know it is. And it feels personal cause thats like citating "the sky is blue". But maybe you are right about the name of the article and the grammer. you know english isnt my naitive tounge, and Romano German Culture could be a better name for it. I'm not saying im not open to change on it, im just saying it should be there.
And Extreme racer, just for the record, I referred to being a Scholar once, so please stop saying I "keep" saying that. Secondly the only comments I erased was on this page's old discussion page, which was pretty much a diffrent article, so again please stop saying I "keep" erasing your comments. I am always open for suggestions.--ProfMozart 05:29, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'm Done
Talk:Gynecologic ultrasonography

message: There are at least two spelling errors on this page.  That does not add to credibility and is just plain sloppy.  Where is tilde? 71.70.158.91 03:31, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: So fix them? Naconkantari 03:31, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: There

message: Not being a medical professional, but being very much interested in politics, I came to this page to review the piece of legislature recently introduced in Virginia, forcing women wo want an abortion to take a transvaginal ultrasound. Unfortunately, I don't feel able to judge the necessity of this procedure from the article. As far as I know, this is discussed controversially ATM, so to allow the general public to pass knowledgeful judgement on this bill, someone with medical knowledge probably ought to complete the article with a non-biased section concerning that matter. --Intelensprotient (talk) 11:56, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: There definitely needs to be more info on this page. I also came here in response to the current controversy.Lionfish0 (talk) 10:43, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Medical necessity
Talk:Pendidikan Moral

message: Is there any source we can cite for the criticisms of pendidikan moral? (Maybe an editorial in a newspaper or something?) Otherwise, I'm afraid it will have to go. 72.8.104.11 03:36, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Michael Davies (television producer)

message: I don't necessarily believe this article was written from an advertisement point of view.  I think if you read any television producer's resume in a glowing fashion, you would get an article very similar to that of this one.  Much of this information, I believe, comes from the biography on the Embassy Row website anyway.  No reason to tag this article other than jealousy, I suppose? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.136.122.229 (talk • contribs) 2007-06-25T23:37:45
:I added the tag.  I chose that tag because I couldn't find one that said "this article reads like an effusive puff biography taken from the subject's web site".  Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, a place for well-written, well-sourced, neutral articles, not official biographies, and especially not copyvio cut-and-paste jobs.  The above poster might want to brush up on WP:NPOV and WP:BLP, the latter of which reads: "Biographies of living people should be written responsibly, conservatively, and in a neutral, encyclopedic tone. While a strategy of eventualism may apply to other subject areas, badly written biographies of living persons should be stubbed or deleted."  Whence, I'm stubbing the article.  Hopefully, others interested in the subject will be able to provide neutral, balanced, sourced information on the subject, appropriately attributed and cited. Robert K S 08:56, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "This article reads like an advertisement" tag
Talk:MG

message: * Metal Gear (series), video games: in article, "MGS" is the standard used, not "MG" --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 04:02, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed items

message: * Mel Gibson, actor --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 04:02, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Trivial initialisms not supported by target article

message: * Mechagodzilla, a fictional character from various films in the Godzilla series ???
* Mother Goose, character and poem ???
* MG (The Perhapanauts), a character in The Perhapanauts comics ???
* Meg Griffin a character on Family Guy voiced by Mila Kunis ???
* Mystery Girl, Roy Orbison album ???  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.104.41.77 (talk) 14:38, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questionable Acronym and initialism 

message: middle grade books? https://www.goodreads.com/genres/middle-grade RealCyGuy (talk) 16:16, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another meaning
Talk:Brandywine Creek (Cuyahoga River tributary)

message: The existing image is too small for that space. It's currently showing the results of being forcibly enlarged. If possible, post a bigger version of that image and use that. - Denimadept (talk) 15:33, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There were two pictures, so I replaced the existing one in the info box with the second independent one Ytiugibma (talk) 00:23, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  infobox image 

message: I just came across this page while looking for the page on the falls in BC. My first impression was "this article is not lookin' so good". Everything is all jumbled up & out of order & well... a mess! I just put a clean-up tag on it moments ago. Hopefully someone will clean it up. If nobody does I might but hopefully not because I have other stuff to do & I know virtually nothing about rivers in Ohio considering I'm from BC! Cheers AndrewEnns (talk) 06:19, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Is there some reason you dated the tag as if from last May? - Denimadept (talk) 17:11, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah there is. I copied it from the Maple Falls article. That article I previously added that same tag onto. Sorry, I forgot to change the date... my bad:) AndrewEnns (talk) 19:54, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair enough. :-) - Denimadept (talk) 21:10, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite 
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Andrew c

message: Edit Stats; Run on  just now Johnbod 04:14, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

message: Thanks for bringing up your concern. I believe this is a special case, and not representative of my warning of anons. I use the templates for obvious vandalism, and try to write personalize messages for WP:EL and other not obvious vandalism issues. However, I've been watching Catholic Church (disambiguation) for a while now (first edit was on 3 July 2006). I have noticed a pattern. An anon editor comes along and bolds only one of the roughly dozen churches listed in the lead. 10:30, 7 July 2006 14:45, 7 July 2006 06:40, 12 July 2006 09:42, 13 July 2006 09:47, 13 July 2006 13:16, 13 July 2006  15:11, 18 July 2006 06:52, 19 July 2006 20 July 2006 01:34, 21 July 2006 11:57, 22 July 2006 01:02, 28 July 2006 13:30, 28 July 2006 02:39, 29 July 2006 10:31, 1 August 2006 12:04, 13 September 2006 (ok, I'm going to stop listing them, I think I've made my point. the edits continue) All of these edits inserted the bolding of the RCC. I believe this was the first diff of a revert 07:26, 7 July 2006 the editor was User:TSP and edit summary was Revert; Roman Catholic Church does not point here, so that term should not be in bold; and the Pope is only "Supreme Pontiff" to those who recognise his primacy, making this title meaningless. Myself, TSP, User:Garzo, User:Fishhead64,  and probably others all reverted these edits. You can see by Novemeber, I had become frustrated with my [edit summary PLEASE stop. rv bolding by repeated vandal. This is also when I went to talk: Talk:Catholic Church (disambiguation)#Slow edit war, where the user replied with a cryptic message. When the same edits started to arise again recently, I started warning the user, (i.e. , , and ). You will note that I started in with the template with the 3rd warning, but when the vandalism happened again, I warned with the 3rd warning again. This was an example of me being cautious. While I personally believe that a) based on the similar IP addresses (mostly all starting with 210.213..) I believe that this is either the same editor, or that the edits in question are related and b) based on the history of this page, that the editor should know better, plus the talk page comment, reverts by multiple editors, and now warnings also bolster the case that the editor should know better. That said, I however, did not feel comfortable giving a last warning on an anon editor with no contribution history (even though in my gut, based on the IP address similarity, I think it is the same person). Taking rash actions based on a gut feeling isn't always prudent. In retrospect, I could have tried to dialog even more with the user, but it seems like the purpose of this user's actions on wikipedia is to insert bold marks around the phrase Roman Catholic Church, and nothing more. Thanks for bringing up this issue, and I hope I have been able to at least give my perspective and share some background on the 'conflict'.-Andrew c 23:31, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Long comment concerning IP user revert and CC disambig
Talk:Roy Mlakar

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:09, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Buy or Sell

message: Let's all please control ourselves with editing this article in the coming days.  Until sourced information is available, please do not add in speculation (your own or from a fan message board) as to why this game was retired, whether it be because of comments by Drew Carey, scoreboard malfunctions, etc. Sottolacqua (talk) 14:18, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Retirement
Talk:Robert S. Abbott House

message: The Robert S. Abbot House is described by the National Historic Landmark summary titled Fort King Site.  Why is it called Fort King there?  There was discussion about this in the Talk page of the List of Chicago Landmarks, where it was asserted that the NHL summary is misnamed.  It's not right to dismiss the name, just because it is not currently known why that is a name for the site.  I think it needs to be explored and explained.  Persuant to editing practice elsewhere for NHL's, I am editing the NRHP infobox to report the NHL name (Fort King Site). doncram 07:51, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I put in a request to the National Park Service to review its webpage calling it Fort King Site. doncram (talk) 18:29, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I tried that a while ago. :) Maybe you'll have better luck than me. Zagalejo^^^ 20:26, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I did receive an emailed acknowledgement that the Fort King stated name and some other apparent errors on other NHL sites were indeed probably errors.  But that the NHL webpages are only updated a couple times a year, and by a different NPS office than the one responding to me.  I think the office was forwarding the info to the right place, but there was no specific commitment on their fixing it.... doncram (talk) 01:00, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Zagalejo pointed out to me that the NHL webpage has recently been updated, and no longer shows the "Fort King Site" name.  Indirect official acknowledgement that that was incorrect information all along.  doncram (talk) 23:06, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: NHL description as Fort King Site?
Talk:Object request broker

message: This article seems pretty much like a stub. ORB is a huge technology and widely deployed within enterprise systems. It seems like a lot more can be said. Object life-cycle management, data persistence management, session management, security, transaction management, performance issues, cross-platform integration, etc. Any objections to adding an 'expert needed' tag? Ronnotel 04:32, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, but Wikipedia policy is that articles must show evidence via citations to independent sources that their subjects are notable. My guess is that someone thought this term in general would catch on to describe more than the Common Object Request Broker Architecture, but do not think it did. When people say "ORB" they probably mean the CORBA ORB, so suggest just a redirect until other ones besides the "Common" one are available in citations. W Nowicki (talk) 22:40, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Woefully deficient 

message: Can there be a table of what CORBA version, what language bindings (and versions there in) a vendors implementation supports? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.46.198.232 (talk) 16:55, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vendor comparison
Talk:George de La Hèle

message: I've reviewed this article as part of the Composers project review of its B-class article.  This is a nice short article; it might even pass GA with a few more citations.  (It might also be good enough for A;  this would require more detailed analysis.) My review is on the comments page; questions and comments should be left here or on my talk page. Magic♪piano 00:22, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Composer project review
Talk:Max Santos

message: Are he and his brother really notable ? They don't seem to have done much outside Aventura. -- Beardo (talk) 03:26, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable ?
Talk:Jon Dorotich

message: I've removed the "ABC presenters" category per the discussion here, but I can't tell if I'm supposed to replace it with :Category:Australian radio personalities or :Category:Australian television presenters. If someone could take care of this, it's be much appreciated. Thanks. Hersfold (t/a/c) 22:34, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Categorization
Talk:Molonglo electorate

message: What's the purpose of the superscript numbers? —Preceding unsigned comment added by WA Burdett (talk • contribs) 
:They were for notes brought across from the Members of the Australian Capital Territory Legislative Assembly pages. forgot to add them, but it should be fixed now --Astrokey44 06:41, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Superscript

message: To get to a B class rating there could be a history - how the electorate came about,  Where the name Molonglo comes from, and some references to show where the data came from! GB 21:41, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: rate
Talk:Memphis Tigers men's basketball

message: they still undefeated & might be in the tourament in March. how long will the Memphis' undefeated streak will last?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.127.178.158 (talk) 00:07, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  23-0 

message: This article has been moved twice now to Memphis Tigers men's basketball.  I invite anyone considering a move in the future to read the first footnote in this article.  It states that the team is called simply the "Memphis Tigers" -- women's sports teams at the U of M are distinguished from men's teams in the very name of the team, "Memphis Lady Tigers."  Thus, there's no reason to distinguish between "Memphis Tigers basketball" and "Memphis Tigers men's basketball" because they refer to the same team.  Thanks. · jersyko talk 14:12, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name 
Talk:Jung Jae-young

message: it reads “Jung Jae-young at Dec 2018”. Where was he? it does not give a location of where the image was taken despite it attempting to indicate that. Bigfatbuddox (talk) 04:31, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Caption to title image