lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ford Strike of 1945

message: Plan to add citations throughout the article. Currently there is a list of references at the bottom of the page, but no works cited. The addition of citations will help to verify the information provided as factual and accurate; this is to say to substantiate the facts included within the article. New sources will also be added to substantiate both new information that will be added, and to aid in adding context. Some existing unverified/ uncited information may or will be removed, this is contingent on whether sources can be found as reference to support the statements that have been made previously. The article will be “restructured” to better accommodate the addition of citations and help the article “flow”. In addition, important persons, institutions, and terms related to the article, that have their own Wikipedia page will have a hyperlink added. 
    
                             Bibliography
Moulton, David. “Ford Windsor 1945.” In On Strike: Six Key Labour Struggles in 	             Canada 1919-1949, edited by Irving Abella, 129-161. Toronto: James Lewis 		& Samuel, Publishers, 1974.
Gindin, Sam. The Canadian Auto Workers: The Birth and Transformation of a Union.
Toronto: James Lorimer & Company, Publishers, 1995.
Krahn, Harvey J. and Graham S. Lowe. Work, Industry & Canadian Society. 		Scarborough, Ont: Nelson, 2002.
Morton, Desmond. Working People: An Illustrated History of the Canadian Labour 	Movement. Ottawa: Deneau Publishers, 1980. --Bands44 (talk) 21:25, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I've taken the liberty of improving the reference section similarly to how you described, though it could certainly use more sources including the ones you identified. I may add some to a further reading section shortly so that they are visible to readers. Thank you for your work on this article – it certainly needed it. Julius177 (talk) 22:23, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal for Adding Citations and Other Editing
Talk:Dalrymple's sign

message: Isn't this the same as Dalrymple sign? WhatamIdoing (talk) 04:57, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?
Talk:Descemet's membrane

message: <Ref>In Haarer, J. C., Inskeep, B. D., & Dee, K. C., "Chapter 13; Protein and acid derived polymers"', in Introduction to biomaterials by Hollinger, J. O., (ed) p 321 <ref> Descement's Membrane is reported at having Type VIII collagen, this contradicts the text's type IV.   The source given is Gelse paschal and aigner 2003, in adv. drug rev. 55:1531-46.  Ive read hollinger but not Gelse. Cewbot (talk) 18:46, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
Talk:Dilated fundus examination

message: Should it be mentioned that eye doctors recommend wearing sunglasses outdoors for several hours after the dilating drops are used? FinalWish (talk) 02:09, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

message: — Assignment last updated by Jesszicc (talk) 18:02, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: MEDU 9330 - Expanded WikiProject Medicine
Talk:Gewehr 41

message: I believe that the G41 could not reach 30 RPM, and was more in the range of 25 rounds per minute. And at the slowest, I think it was 15 rounds per minute...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hunt3r.j2 (talk • contribs) 05:06, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rate of Fire 

message: Why is there a single article about two different rifles? What's planed next, merge M1 Garand and M1 Carbine?  --91.5.109.82 (talk) 14:36, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Scope 

message: Article currently reads in part This in turn made reloading relatively slow (as compared to rifles that had magazines that could be reloaded from a single unit, such as the M1 Garand, although it was typical for its time, being identical to the reloading procedure of the 10-round Lee–Enfield).
Rubbish. The 10-round Lee–Enfield magazine was always loaded from two 5-round clips, as the article on it rightly states, and still is, and for good reason. In contact you do not want to wait until your magazine is empty before you reload.
No, the troops in an SMLE-equipped rifle squad are taught to count to five. And as soon as possible after that fifth shot, a clip goes in. Preferably before even chambering the next round.
And if you don't do that then you are putting both your life and those of the rest of the squad in needless peril. Or at least that's the way we Aussies fight. Andrewa (talk) 01:02, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious claim
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Shopping Centers/Archive Oct 2007

message: The deletionist brigade deleted my article on Macleod Mall, identifying it 20 minutes after creation as unencyclopedic. They are currently debating Centre 2000 despite the fact it survived an AfD vote which was to keep it. They've nominated it again as AfD. Is the project interested in helping out the discussion? 139.48.81.98 21:18, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletions 

message: Hi there. I just wanted to inform this WikiProject of the following AfDs:
* Sierra Vista Mall (2nd nomination)
* International Marketplace,
* Boulevard Mall
* Post Oak Mall
* NewPark Mall
There may be more. I didn't go though all of the recent AfDs. I notice there were a lot malls listed for some unknown reason, and upon discovering this project I thought you'd like to know. Cheers, Rocket000 02:48, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: More deletions

message: Please see Talk:Shopping in Dublin (Sarah777 20:38, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please note - this article was created with the full intension of mergeing and deleting all the individual shopping centre articles, not simply being an overview article with supporting shopping centre articles. Wide community input is desirable on this issue. Exit2DOS2000•T•C• 00:56, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Exit2DOS2000•T•C• ,I had realised that, which is why I came here (you were involved in the Letterkenny debates). The Dublin/Ireland merge/delete decided by a very small number of editors could then be used as a precedent to take the strategy further afield; that is why I want to very considerably broaden this debate, but I'm not sure how, given that few editors, (myself included) have much interest in Shopping Centres/Malls - or at least in writing articles about them. But Wiki is populated by 'minority interest' topics, like life, and a casual disinterested small group with maybe an anti-business prejudice can't just zap them! (Sarah777 13:26, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion of ALL Dublin and Ireland Shopping Centre Articles
Talk:Ganglion cell layer

message: This page should be linked to: Retinal ganglion cell  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 136.159.29.31 (talk) 05:39, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  two overlapping pages 

message: for reading 103.212.214.24 (talk) 13:11, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ganglion layer
Talk:Glaucoma valve

message: I have moved this comment from the article because it was not appropriate Mike 13:52, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment moved from article page
Talk:Homonymous hemianopsia

message: "A stroke on the entire right side of the brain, in addition to producing a homonymous hemianopsia, will also lead to the syndrome of Hemispatial neglect." I am not a neurologist but I do know a bit about the neurology of vision. As I understand it, hemianopsia is the result of occipital lobe damage, and Hemispatial neglect results from right parietal lobe damage. Of course, both areas, being roughly adjacent,  might well get damaged at the same time, leading to both conditions, but they are far from being the entire right side of the brain. If the whole right side were damaged (frontal and temporal cortex, cerebellum, ...) I am pretty sure that you would see some much more severe symptoms than these. The quoted sentence may not be false, but surely it is very misleading. Treharne (talk) 05:51, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Entire right side! 

message: The etymology section doesn't address what to me is quite a bizarre feature of the name. 'Homonymous' doesn't translate as 'same', it translates as 'of the same name'. This would seem like unnecessary pedantry if it weren't for the fact that the article has an etymology section. As it stands, I would be interested to know why it has ended up with such an inappropriate name. (My knowledge of the classical languages is almost non-existent, but I'm sure there must have been a better-suited 'homo' word.) Just thinking about it now, the name would make sense if the hemianopia affected the field with the same name in each side, -ie bitemporal or binasal hemianopia. Unfortunately, this is not the case. Cry me a river, I suppose. Melaena (talk) 00:17, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Etymology

message: You don't just impose two demilunes as an opaque Photoshop layer over a photograph of Paris and call it hemianopsia.  Hemianopsia does not produce dysconjugate gaze, so fixation of gaze in each eye should result in the same scene in each eye, apart a parallax of 6 cm or so.  Given the far distance depicted in this scene of Paris, the parallax is inconsequential and hence each demilune should contain the same image. 05:21, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos of Paris are misleading
Talk:Hypertensive retinopathy

message: I have made a start on revising and expanding this page. Adh (talk) 23:45, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion
Talk:Intrastromal corneal ring segment

message: Should it be mentioned that these can also be used to treat keratoconus? I just got Intacs to treat my keratoconus. Monsuco (talk) 02:44, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it absolutely should. To the best of my knowledge, Intacs are being used almost exclusively for keratoconus these days. The manufacturer is not pushing their use for regular old vision correction anymore. I would update the article myself, but have never gotten around to it. -adavidw (talk) 05:04, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Lacrimal gland

message: Should the lacrimal gland article and the nasolacrimal duct article be merged?
--Devin.richard.97 (talk) 00:12, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should the Nasolacrimal duct article be merged with this article? 

message: Is wikipedia drivenb by religion now? Why there isn't any mention about general animal phisiology?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.60.175.214 (talk) 23:36, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  whats all this antropocentric nonsense?
Talk:Lagophthalmos

message: I know someone who was born with this condition. Doesn't have any other problems. Can make facial expressions. Muscles generally work OK. He just can't close his eyes. I tried looking for information on being born with this condition to include in article but couldn't find anything.TheRealdeal (talk) 10:56, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Birth Defect?

message: At the time of writing, Reference 3 is marked as dead.
https://travelersunited.org/today/kicked-off-my-flight-for-sleeping-with-my-eyes-open/
I could not find the original article on archive.org or the author's blog at elliott.org, but here is attestation of its existence as well as what seems like the original text. I don't know what the standard procedure is for replacing a direct source with an indirect source, but let's archive this before it dies too. 135.180.50.23 (talk) 03:29, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Christopher Elliott Link Rot
Talk:Nasolacrimal duct

message: Where is the tear duct located in the body? Also, the pictures aren't as informative, at least to me (i can't understand most of the things on there :/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beary605 (talk • contribs) 01:10, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where...??? and pictures 

message: *Suppport the March proposal to merge Nasolacrimal canal and this page on the duct, because they're so closely-related topics their best discussed together for context. Distinctions between them can be discussed on the page. Merging here might be best, as this is the better-developed page. Klbrain (talk) 09:34, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal
Talk:Ocular tremor

message: Hello all! I am a student editor who will be editing this article as a project for my advanced writing class. Please reach out to me if I am making any etiquette mistakes, formatting mistakes, etc. I noticed this page is primarily written off of primary sources (including a blog post), which I will be removing. I plan to add information from secondary sources. Please note my plan below:
* Remove all current sources that are primary sources (including blog post)
* Remove entire section on Simon Cooke - this was from the blog post
* Confirm whether article needs to be changed to "Ocular microtremor" instead of "Ocular tremor"
* Review current information to see if it corroborates with my secondary sources
** Keep all that is confirmed
** Erase all that is not (investigate for this information in other secondary sources, first)
* Write any additional information using the secondary sources I found
** Add in-text citations
** Add in-text links to other articles:
*** nystagmus, parkinson's, MS, microsaccade, eye movements, fixational eye movements
* Choose how to divide up sectioning: general intro section, abnormal tremor, related kinds of eye movements (?)
* Decide whether to keep current image (is it relevant?)
Please feel free to leave any suggestions! GreenWaterBottle2 (talk) 04:15, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Neonatal conjunctivitis

message: I plan to contribute a statement about how most hospitals are required by state law to use eye drops or ointment to prevent the disease soon after birth. I also plan to add that neonatal conjunctivitis may be caused by a blocked tear duct instead of bacterial infection, and the subsequent treatment if it is indeed caused by a blocked tear duct. Additionally, I would like to note that it is possible for newborns to suffer from neonatal conjunctivitis due to reactions with chemicals in common eye drops. Finally, I will add that prophylaxis with a 1% silver nitrate solution has largely been discontinued. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Johns Hopkins Medicine, and the National Center for Biotechnology Information will be my sources. 
Sources: 
http://www.cdc.gov/conjunctivitis/newborns.html
http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/healthlibrary/conditions/pediatrics/conjunctivitis_90,P01678/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4170304/
Gcleveland15 (talk) 18:33, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible Additions
Talk:Opsoclonus

message: Is there a such thing as Voluntary Opsoclonus? I can make my eyes twitch back and forth at a rapid pace at will, but I can't find anything about it on Wikipedia. What would this be categorized as, and should it be mentioned somewhere? This was the closest article that I found that came close to explaining what I can do. 12.48.228.194 (talk) 21:12, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: If it is voluntary it is not opsoclonus.DiptanshuTalk 16:49, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Voluntary Opsoclonus? 

message: The infobox needs much of relevant information to be added. Cooperation is requested in this regard.DiptanshuTalk 16:50, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox
Talk:John Besh

message: I took a good whack at the flowery, excessive wording in this section (much of which seemed to have been copied from Besh's restaurant web sites). Is it OK to remove the {advert} label from this section?--Larry (talk) 04:54, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Label removed.--Larry (talk) 08:36, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restaurant section puffery removed -- OK to remove {advert} label? 

message: Ive done the same editing for Books as was done for Restaurants. Is it OK to remove this {advert} label?--Larry (talk) 22:26, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Entire section was deleted, so no action required.--Larry (talk) 08:36, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Books section puffery removed -- OK to remove {advert} label? 

message: Be on the lookout for WP:COPYVIO; I have a feeling that much of the flowery wording is copied verbatim from other web sites. In rewriting the restaurant and book sections, I ended up removing what appeared to be copyright violations. There were also multiple instances of WP:COPYVIO in section John Besh Foundation. I had to gut the entire section, It now needs a rewrite.--Larry (talk) 23:16, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Watch out for WP:COPYVIO 

message: Please add page protection to avoid vandalism due to recent negative allegations FollowNPOVandBLP (talk) 00:31, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please add page protection to avoid vandalism due to recent negative allegations 

message: Update on Borgne, closed in 2021 2600:8807:5606:2A00:2C1C:338C:5CA5:56C2 (talk) 07:23, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Borgne Edit
Talk:Avtek 400A

message: Cruise speed cannot be higher than  maximum speed. --95.222.186.244 (talk) 09:17, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speed
Talk:Beneš-Mráz

message: I can't find the ref tags the bot is on about, HelpPetebutt (talk) 13:58, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Kenworthy Hall

message: Expanded article from a one paragraph stub.  Added images to infobox, text, and created a gallery.  Removed stub tags.  Altairisfartalk 07:10, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansions
Talk:Newfoundland pine marten

message: This page is under construction.  I have linked to it from the American Marten page and the WikiPedia:WikiProject Newfoundland and Labrador talk page. This page needs:
* legal photograph
* references
* additional text
Please bear with me while I add them. If anyone has a legitimate-use photograph, please add it.Vulcan's Forge 01:16, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Construction 

message: Updated links and added some additional information.  I visited the Salmonier Nature Park in September 2007 and one of the Pine Marten used in the breeding program is now housed in one of the outdoor habitat areas;  does anyone know of an official reference for this?  (The Salmonier Nature Park homepage is horrendously out of date.)Vulcan's Forge (talk) 01:42, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updated 

message: This is regarding an edit made by . The edit was undone by me for its lack of source and summary. The user claims, "My change to the article was updating an outdated scientific name for the southern red-backed vole from Clethrionomys gapperi to Myodes gapperi."User_talk:Yashovardhan_Dhanania#Change_to_Newfoundland_pine_marten . However, he/she has not provided a reference for the same.
I suggest a person interested in the topic to look for valid references and make the change here. On second thought, it might be contended that no source is required for updating an old scientific term with its new one. Please post your relevant thoughts below here for the community to discuss and decide! 
Thanks! Yashovardhan (talk) 16:20, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding an [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Newfoundland_pine_marten&oldid=771264603 edit] 
Talk:Microvan

message: When I found it, the article said "[e]ngines have usually displacements under 1.0 litres."  For added readability, I changed it to "[e]ngines usually have displacements under 1.0 litres."  The use of the word "displacements" puzzles me, though.  I'm not sure what it means here.  I'm not a car aficionado, though, so I may just not understand the concept.GreenGourd 01:17, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Displacements?
Talk:Social action

message: I took the liberty of changing the title of this page from "Social actions" to "Social action." It seems that ever since 2005, the title has been plural, in seeming violation of WP:MOS. In some cases there is a reason for a plural article title. Is there such a reason in this case? Michael Hardy (talk) 20:56, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why plural?
Talk:Italian cruiser Emanuele Filiberto Duca d'Aosta

message: I've added more info. It's all from a single (authoritative) source (listed under references) and so in-line citations seemed unnecessary. Supporting comments for any reassessment would be appreciated. Folks at 137 (talk) 19:00, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Inline citations are always neccessary! ;) I would just have one at the end of each paragraph to a specific page in the reference; eg Whitley, p.137. I would also try and find another reference or two to add to it. The article does still seem a bit scarce in terms of being comprehensive on the subject, though I understand that paucity of information and sources can be a problem. If you want a new MILHIST assessment once you have done the inlines, then ask at WP:MHA#REQ. All the best. Woody (talk) 19:49, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reassessment
Talk:Italian cruiser Luigi di Savoia Duca degli Abruzzi

message: Standard load 11350 tons, full load 11735 tons? Only 385 tons of difference, when, for any other light cruiser, the difference was of about 2000 tons? Her engines were fed with thin air? What's the source of this folly?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.235.12.143 (talk) 17:31, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Standard load and full load

message: According to http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/obituaries/11542578/Ian-Fraser-naval-pilot-obituary.html it was 1942 that the ship was hit by a torpedo. Philafrenzy (talk) 10:46, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Dates
Talk:Italian battleship Conte di Cavour

message: Bargoni and Gay is cited three times in the article, but is not listed in the references section. Is it:
*  from the Conte di Cavour-class battleship article - and if it is shouldn't the location be Rome rather than Roma?Nigel Ish (talk) 14:55, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bargoni & Gay?
Talk:Culture of the Isle of Wight

message: Whilst it is gratifying to see the Brading Haven Yacht Club s one of the most famous in the world, especially over they gurt toffs down at the Bembridge Sailing Club, I fear this maybe a bit partisan. Still good on yer nipper!Streona 01:32, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

message: Link to tv 12 appears to point to the wrong place.  I don't know if there is a page about this station, however.  It's teletext service is remembered and preserved at http://www.teletext.org.uk/index.php?cat=30_Archived-nbsp~Pages&page=30_Wightext-nbsp~1999 Robirrelevant (talk) 17:14, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  TV 12 

message: It seems to me that it wouldn't be that difficult to integrate most of this page's material back into the main Isle of Wight page, avoiding the need for a separate page?
:Agreed. I'm wondering about notability of this subject as there is no indication in the article that "culture of the IoW" has been written about as a specific subject. It reads like original research. Tacyarg (talk) 07:34, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Purpose of page 
Talk:Italian battleship Andrea Doria

message: Because there were two Italian battleships named Andrea Doria -- this one and Italian battleship Andrea Doria (1885) -- I have moved the article about the 1913 ship here and changed the resulting Italian battleship Andrea Doria redirect page into a shipindex/disambig page providing links to both the 1913 ship and to a new article on the 1885 ship. The titles of both articles now comply with the Wikipedia naming standards (i.e., ship name plus launch year in parentheses when multiple ships have the same name).
I have fixed all articles and lists linking to the disambig page as a result of the move so that they now link to the appropriate ship article (for the 1885 ship or the 1913 ship). All links -- except those on various talk pages (those of you with such links on your talk pages may wish to correct them) -- are now correct (as of 3 May 2010).
Some links to Italian battleship Andrea Doria should have linked to the 1885 ship, not to the 1913 ship as they did when the 1913 ship article had its original title without launch year. Those errors should now be resolved as well; all links intended for the 1885 ship should now link to the article for the 1885 ship. Mdnavman (talk) 16:50, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Article move and linking corrections