lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Economy of the Caribbean

message: As of this time, the article is completely unreferenced, with exception of the last single-sentence paragraph. A lot of data is reported, without the ability to verify its correctness. Also, many conclusions are drawn from the data. These opinions and conclusions appear to be original research, as they are all unsourced as well. I am going to nominate the article for deletion. This will allow at least seven days for discussion and improvement on the article. If the issues with the article are resolved by the end of discussion, it has a much better chance of being kept. —Josh3580talk/hist 04:59, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unreferenced (almost)...
Talk:2007 Minnesota Vikings season

message: Please note, if you are contributing here, thank you for your contributions.  In an effort to read like an encyclopedic article instead of a Fan Blog, I've removed several instances of "fan language" which tends to violate the WP:NPOV policy, besides just sounding bad.  
Please avoid terms like "drew first blood" (removed 6 times), "dominated" (even if they won by 30), and "fortunately" (to describe a MN score, etc. vs an opponents score).  
PS.  I'm a huge Vikings fan.  I'm also a huge Wikipedia fan.  If you want to write about the Vikings encyclopedically, glad you're here!  If you want to write about how they dominated the opposition, drew first blood, how wonderful Adrian Peterson is, how awful Detroit is, how much every other team sucks, or anything along those terms,  go to a blog.  Happy editing!  Keeper  |  76 16:53, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: I just did a lot of cleanup
Talk:Fort Christian

message: This article claims Fort Christian is the oldest structure in the USVI. However, the article at Blackbeard's Castle states it was built in 1679, one year before Fort Christian. A source that confirms one or the other would be useful. Gentgeen (talk) 06:55, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Construction on Fort Christian was begun in 1672 and "completed" (as much as this sort of thing be called finished) in 1680; Blackbeard's Castle was completed in 1679.  So, which is older is a matter of how you define "older". Magic♪piano 21:01, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  conflict
Talk:Treaty 1

message: While 'aboriginal' was the term used at the time, it has since been superseded by 'indigenous.'  This article should replace all instances of 'aboriginal' (outside of direct quotes) with 'indigenous.'  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Josh Roby (talk • contribs) 19:06, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aboriginal → Indigenous 

message: Article only cites from one chapter from one source in this section. Can anyone find other sources corroborating this? Additionally, seems to be lifted directly from the source, section should be paraphrased. Section also contains peacocking sentences (e.g., "Not only did the imperial British Crown keep on what can only be called the down-low, the radical, bellicose senses of surrender and property it forwarded in the seemingly-diplomatic making of treaties") and emotionally-charged language, section should be written to be more "matter-of-fact". Also, repeats the word "controversial" a lot. Raccoonny (talk) 03:36, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV issue in Property Rights Under Different Legal Frameworks
Talk:Fungi (music)

message: Can some West Indian comment on the normal pronunciation of "fungi" as a musical style? In jazz circles, in the well-known calypso tune by Blue Mitchell "Fungii Mama," the word is generally pronounced "Fun-gee"; but I see other sources treating it as spoken like the plural of "fungus," with a hard G. I'd guess that Blue Mitchell was familiar with local usage, so I am inclined to follow the jazz world; but who knows? This is not a topic where published sources are easy to find. Even if we can't get a definitive statement for the article based on a publication (and which might be suspect anyway), it would be helpful if someone with local accent experience could give us a clue.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.53.79.37 (talk) 19:01, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 
Talk:Röhm Gesellschaft

message: User:SBKru has recently removed all mentions of firearms from this article.  Shouldn't those parts of Röhm's history be kept in? --Molotovnight (talk) 07:17, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I reverted all the changes because the language was excessively promotional. However, if the company is now focused on clamping devices, I think it is reasonable to emphasize that aspect, and mention the firearms in a much reduced manner (and the large image can possibly be removed). Do you know if the company is now associated with firearms; when was it? Johnuniq (talk) 07:43, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  All mentions of firearms taken out? 

message: User Ap2010 has rewritten this article and has created RÖHM GmbH. I do not currently have time to consider the changes, but am posting this to alert anyone watching this page that a new article exists. Johnuniq (talk) 01:34, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  New article
Talk:LGBT rights in Puerto Rico

message: Here in Puerto Rico, the youth and most young adults (below 40) are quite liberal when it comes to gay rights. In fact, homophobia is often frowned at by youths in their late teens and early twenties. The youth is also coming out earlier in school and finding quite a lot of acceptance or at least apathy. It must be pointed out that political parties aren't divided by liberal / conservative but by pro-statehood and pro-status quo, and thus people vote for those who support the Puerto Rican status they prefer which could lead to a socially conservative congress. Social issues were rarely discussed during the 2008 general elections campaign, instead economic issues and the Puerto Rican status were the main issues.
Most of the homophobia present is closer to "fear" or "uncomfort" rather than hate.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.243.193.245 (talk) 22:32, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, phobia is defined as defined as a fear.THD3 (talk) 16:31, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  I thought I'd point out that... 

message: This link was provided by User:Einsteinboricua at . Dustin (talk) 16:30, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I read that as a prediction of what will happen this afternoon. Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 17:27, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I think we should wait for corroboration. Ultimately, the First Circuit will rule, or else defer to SCOTUS. I don't think the Garcia Padilla administration can decide unilaterally to recognize out-of-jurisdiction same-sex marriages. -Kudzu1 (talk) 17:53, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Why not? West Virginia dropped its defense of its ban which, like Puerto Rico, was just a statute. Ultimately, it was due to being against 4th Circuit precedent and later on a federal court struck it down. Einsteinboricua (talk) 20:04, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Information at http://www.noticel.com/noticia/173620/en-paso-historico-gobierno-ahora-valida-el-matrimonio-gay.html 

message: Can someone who understands how this ruling about same-sex marriage in regard to the US Constitution affects Puerto Rican law please update the article with the relevant information? I'm afraid I don't quite understand if/how the US Constitution and rulings about it affect Puerto Rico, so I can't update it myself. --Thek826 (talk) 16:22, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  June 26, 2015 SCOTUS Ruling 

message: I am unable to read the article, which probably qutes a scientific cource. Please reference the source.Xx236 (talk) 11:05, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Nuevo Dia" is not scientific
Talk:Wellington Point, Queensland

message: Fernbourne house is mentioned as an historic attraction, but it sadly burnt down. http://www.redlandcitybulletin.com.au/story/300671/fire-destroys-historic-wellington-point-house/ - 58.96.54.118 (talk) 14:42, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fernbourne House burnt down in 2012
Talk:Peter Ryan (rugby, born 1971)

message: Any relation to Michael Ryan who also played for the Broncos?--Jeff79 21:21, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Michael Ryan

message: There is a discussion regarding disambiguation of rugby players named "Peter Ryan" at Talk:Peter Ryan (rugby union)#Disambiguation of rugby players named Peter Ryan. As it may directly affect the naming of this article,  editors here may like to participate in it. MegaSloth (talk) 13:27, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation of rugby players named Peter Ryan
Talk:Treaty 9

message: Anything to do with Mishkeegogamang is constantly relabeled as Oji-cree or Cree for no reason. The community is historically and still in modern day an Ojibwe community. CJLippert's revisions on these pages are correct in language and tribal group identification. Any changes (relabelling) outside of those should require citation. I suspect those who are editing the page are people from smaller families that have ties to Severn Ojibwe (oji-cree) communities in modern day, that does not reflect the community as a whole. 207.35.36.152 (talk) 01:43, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mishkeegogamang
Talk:Harbour Island, Bahamas

message: Harbour Island is very nice exspecially their sandy (pink) beaches but, they need a little help in the service department its deplarable I tell ya! yes ya! i said it.that concludes my message
Hi SurfsUp, Thanks for tip about the links guidelines. Sorry about adding the links without knowing what I'm doing. I've done very little editing so this is all quite new to me. I may edit the page some more to add some stuff so it's good to know that someone else is looking over what I post.
I also added the book links and arranged them so the books written by Brilanders are at the top. I tried to follow what was already there.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Larry Deack (talk • contribs) 05:23, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Links

message: Hello Larry. I liked your collection of photos of Harbour Island but it has the look and feel of "photo gallery". Wiki's image use policy  says, in part "In general, galleries are discouraged in main article namespace; historically, such galleries are more often deleted than kept." My personal opinion would be to pick your best shot of your batch and delete the rest. Again, just a personal opinion based on my read of Wiki's image policies. SurfsUp (talk) 06:11, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: My pleasure, Larry. Obviously there are more representative photos then there is text, and I wouldn't suggest adding more text for the sake of supporting more images, so I continue to recommend removing all but one of your photos. If you're looking to share your travel photos with others, my suggestion would be something like Google's Picassa. SurfsUp (talk) 08:38, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos 

message: do not move (but move Harbour Island (disambiguation) to Harbour Island) Anthony Appleyard (talk) 19:47, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Move?
Talk:Information commons

message: Brilliant though the new Information Commons at the University of Sheffield is (and I'm not an entirely unbiased observer), the penultimate bullet point needs to be amended to refer to the more general usage of Information Commons as a library or learning space with pervasive IT. The University of Sheffield's new facility is almost certainly the first in the UK to use this label, but it has gained in popularity in North America and elsewhere during the last decade.
There are two distinct variants in the types of facility so designated
* large standalone buildings, such as Sheffield's, the University of Auckland's, and Loyola University's
* areas of existing buildings, usually university libraries, equipped with student computers and often refurbished and refurnished to accommodate the necessary power and data services
A useful but now somewhat dated guide to IC facilities worldwide was compiled by David Murray in 2001 and is available at http://www.brookdale.cc.nj.us/library/infocommons/ic_home.html.
I will be happy to make an edit along these lines, but will be grateful for comments and other examples first.
Artq55 21:26, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

message: Doing some informal research around this area, it struck me that it might help readers to have a "See also" reference to Knowledge commons? There is already a link back here from there. Does this sound like a good idea for fellow Wikipedians who watch this page? Simon Grant (talk) 20:58, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Connect with knowledge commons? 

message: Please see the discussion at Talk:Future generations#Links to this article which relates to reverted edits to this article. Verbcatcher (talk) 10:10, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should [[future generations]] be linked?
Talk:KWDO

message: I have a friend that is a walking encyclopedia for music. I believe he's worth a phone call..559-972-0598. I know it's a shoot in the dark,but I promise you won't be disappointed
Yours. Truly
John weemes. 47.153.136.128 (talk) 05:26, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kenny point, music history pro.
Talk:KNKX

message: Hello,
I've recently moved this page to KNKX-FM because the station is now official going under the new call name KNKX. See here. I don't have time yet to make all changes to the page (as well as its logo, etc.) It'd be much appreciated if someone does that.
Thanks, Potasmic (talk) 07:15, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I reverted the edit because the callsign change hasn't taken effect. Once it's officially KNKX, that'd be the time for the change. We usually follow the F.C.C.-issued callsign for the name, and we don't know yet whether they'll include an -FM suffix or not. As of a few minutes ago, it's still KPLU-FM according to the F.C.C..Stereorock (talk) 19:20, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: For the record, when the call change does show up in the FCC database (which, when applied for as part of an ownership change, can take a few days or more, even if it means it doesn't appear until some time after the date the call sign may have actually taken effect — and that could easily end up being the case here), it looks like it will just be "KNKX" and not "KNKX-FM" according to the FCC's August 11, 2016 call sign actions public notice. (Note that the public notice listed it in the "Call Signs Reserved for Pending Sales Applicants" section, since the sale had not been completed yet.) When the call sign on this page is listed as "KNKX", then a move can take place. --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:52, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, the station here already changed to the new name, but I guess we'll wait for the FCC to release a report. Potasmic (talk) 22:03, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moving to KNKX
Talk:33⅓ Revolutions per Monkee

message: Many sources note that this special was seen opposite the Academy Awards. However, this was not the case back in the Eastern US, where it was seen opposite The Avengers on ABC (which was in its final season). The special was also seen in the time slot normally occupied by Rowan & Martin's Laugh-In, which was normally seen on Mondays on NBC (4/14/1969 was on a Monday). Considering that Laugh-In was 1969's top show and that the Oscars did not begin until later in the east, NBC probably wanted this show to succeed, but apparently, this was not the case. -- azumanga 21:29, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  33 1/3 vs. The Oscars

message: Im looking through the article, but dont know what to do with this part, or how to word it if someone has an idea of where to put it.
Here is the portion.
*33⅓ Revolutions Per Monkee is generally considered today as a satirical look at The Monkees' history, taking aim at their "manufactured" origin. The plot is believed to mirror the group's timeline from their assembly to that point (i.e. their relabeling as "Monkees", performing as a group, rediscovering their individual selves, and finally breaking free from control). "The Beginning of The End" might have also foretold the eventual demise of The Monkees, which would cease to exist officially by the end of 1971.
If someone wants to tackle this one portion that was in a trivia section, knock yourself out.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by PYLrulz (talk • contribs) 04:41, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dont know what to do with this part
Talk:History of the United States Virgin Islands

message: When did the inhabitants of these islands acquire US citizenship? This article gives a different year (1932) than the article on the United States Virgin Islands (1927). Crusio 00:02, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: citizenship
Talk:Charles Sreeve Peterson

message: Regarding this removal of a ref, onlineutah.com is not eligible to be used as a reliable source. It is advertising for a realtor (not to mention adsense income), it's likely copyvio, and there is no indications of scholarship. There was also a discussion of this at Talk:Mantua Township, Portage County, Ohio#Mantua, Utah; if anything, the next place is probably to ask at WP:RSN. tedder (talk) 18:03, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, I see what you're saying. --TrustTruth (talk) 20:54, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  onlineutah.com as a reliable source 
Talk:Philip Whistler Street

message: Biographies are not just illustrated with portraiture. This is a perfectly relevant image. Agricolae (talk) 04:07, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gravestone
Talk:Peter Elson

message: Damn shame he died; until five minutes ago I assumed he was still alive. I have fond memories of the Terran Trade Authority books, and old Harry Harrison book covers. Still, this article states that he died "of a heart attack in Skegness while working on mural paintings for Butlins", whereas the article's only source says that he died in a pub, with no mention of Skegness. These two facts aren't contradictory, but there's no source on the internet whatsoever to support his death in Skegness. I note that the only external link, an "unofficial homepage", is essentially a reprint of this forum post, which seems to be the only piece of writing on the internet about Elson. The rest of that site's biography is a copy of the Wikipedia article. I'm not sure if Wikipedia can source articles from websites that source their information from Wikipedia's article, it's a bit inbred. -Ashley Pomeroy 21:49, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Since writing that someone has put in a link to this wonderful website which clears that up, and has a photo of the mural itself. Poor chap. Along with Chris Foss etc he has probably had more real and direct influence on popular culture than all of the Turner prize winners since the beginning of time. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 15:44, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death 
Talk:Bellavista (band)

message: The notability of Vue (band) has been questioned. I think it is a borderline case; the article only names one album and singles. But anyway: Since the article Vue (band) is not too long, and that band no longer exists, it might be best to merge the content about Vue into here (as "historical information").
Proposed as part of the Notability Wikiproject --B. Wolterding 10:32, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Content has been merged. --B. Wolterding 13:47, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  merger proposed: Vue
Talk:Michael Somogyi

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.whonamedit.com/doctor.cfm/1852.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moneytrees🌴Talk🌲Help out at CCI!  20:03, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Battle on the Ice of Lake Vänern

message: I object to the sentence:
"In the Battle on the Ice, the combatants are described as fighting on horseback, although the later Vikings and Anglo-Saxons who told of this battle in their legends would fight on foot."
Not only because I think its more correct to call scandinavians for scandinavians and not vikings, but mainly becuase its simply not true. Scandinavians used horses according to Tacitus, Jordanes and later historians.
regards, Dan Koehl (talk) 23:37, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Faint

message: This is going to be very vague and maybe not helpful, but in 2007 NBC aired a few eppisodes of a new TV show about irish brothers that came on after Heroes. In the first eppisode, "Disappear" by The Faint could be heard playing in the background in one of the scenes. I don't know how to prove it or even what the name of the show was, but I thought it was worth mentioning since there is a trivia section that talks about The Faint having music in The Office. Smashedapples (talk) 20:34, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Trivia Section Addition

message: I don't know if anyone else thinks these guys fit under electroclash music.  That's pretty much what all their genres point to.  ...and they sound pretty much like Fischerspooner (for those who don't know, a very respected electroclash group).  I know they have a bit more rock influence, but food for thought. Xe7al (talk) 22:48, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Genre: Electroclash
File talk:Mayerling.final letter.jpg

message: Most of the translation of Mayerling's suicide note to Stephanie is quite correct, however, there are two little inconsistencies in meaning.  I wouldn't use "poor wee one" when referring to his daughter, but I think "poor little one" is much more on target.  "Wee" is a word not commonly used in the United States (unless one is trying to sound Irish).  The word also implies something much smaller than just "little."  On the other hand, in the original, "die arme Kleine," the word "little" is capitalized, and therefore used as a noun for his daughter, a form English doesn't have; thus, "little one" has to be used to convey the meaning.  "Wee" adds a meaning that the German letter doesn't have.
And the second problem I have with the translation is when Mayerling wrote, "Ich gehe ruhig in den Tod," he was not using the word "ruhig" in the sense of "quiet!"  The translation should be, "I go calmly to my death."
Catwoman07076 (talk) 09:52, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whose translation is this?