Talk:Super Smash Bros./Archive 6

message: You guys know the drill. Coreycubed 22:15, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archive 5 

message: On http://wii.ign.com/articles/809/809868p1.html
it says here Two updates today, both of them multimedia. First up is another video cutscene from The Subspace Emissary, this time bringing together Diddy Kong and Fox McCloud to fight off the legendary Pokemon, Rayquaza. "The clip seems to set up a boss fight for the adventure mode", so it could be that we finally have our second boss character confirmed – Rayquaza would join Petey Piranha, the only other boss so far known for sure, if indeed that's what the clip is implying.--DarkFierceDeityLink 22:04, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: #1 - Rayquaza is taken out by Fox in that very same cutscene; it doesn't even look like you would be fighting him once gameplay begins.  #2 - What bearing does this have on the article, exactly?  The Subspace Army paragraph covers all Brawl boss scenarios pretty well for the time being; I personally think it would be a waste to go into detail until the game is out and we can see for ourselves who all the new bosses are, thereby being able to list them all in one go. Arrowned 22:13, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

text: Absolutely not. You really need to stop, you're on thin ice as it is. Coreycubed 22:21, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bosess 

message: Felt that it was needed simply for organization and navigating purposes.  I'd probably make a reply to some of the arguements, but I'd just be repeating myself again in different words. TwilightPhoenix 16:01, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I noticed when reading the Norfair entry again, the possibility of the words being a bad translation rose.  In the Norfair entry, talking about the lava wave, it makes a statement, "The tension rises. Yes."  Not quite proper English, and the same may have happened under Lucas' moves entry. TwilightPhoenix 16:01, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think it is wise to question the translator. He works at Nintendo, he has played the game, he talks to the designer, he knows what is and what isn't with the game, so the translations will be accurate. Trying to diminish the translator and his job is not going to change the meaning of the post. It is the same in all translations.  --LN3000 17:29, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: How can you say he's played the game. It just as likely they just send him text and have him translate it. DurinsBane87 17:42, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: http://media.wii.ign.com/media/748/748545/vids_1.html Gameplay Demonstration (Off-Screen HD) (October 14, 2007) --LN3000 18:10, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Arbitrary Section Break 2

message: 
Hi, I'm requesting an edit to the Playable Characters section. Could a reference to Jigglypuff, Ganon, and Sheik be added? Like how I did it on the Super Smash Bros. Wiki? This way, people know what the Game Informer article said, and where David Hayter mentioned Jigglypuff as being in Brawl.
If you don't understand, then add this (edit the page and insert the text):
#  (for Ganon and Sheik in the Brawl column)
#  (for Jigglypuff in the Brawl column)
Then for the notes (remove the nowiki tags):
#:5.  In an interview with Game Informer, Eiji Aonuma mentioned his designers submitted Ganondorf and Sheik's initial designs to Masahiro Sakurai for Brawl and that Sakurai's team then modified their appearance. However, it is unknown if they are still in the game.
#:6.  In an interview, David Hayter was asked which character from Brawl he would most enjoy defeating. His response included Jigglypuff, among other characters, though it is not officially confirmed that Jigglypuff will be in the game.
Please and thank you.--Richard (Talk - Contribs) 21:44, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please review the talk page archives. These have all been discussed and it has been decided not to add them based on their not being enough evidence to support they are in the game as playable characters...for Sheik and Gannondorf, Jigglypuff isn't added because Hayter isn't a good enough source to justify Jigglypuff is playable. -Sukecchi 21:47, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not asking that the article say they are in the game. I want the references to be added to show the rumors of them being in the game, not confirming them as characters. The table will still indicate it is unknown they are in the game. The references also tell more about the comments; when I was looking at the table I saw it saying "The GameInformer article is evidence, but it is NOT confirmation. Do not be too quick to repeat it, because it will be removed unless confirmed by official Nintendo sources". Alright; what Game Informer article? The reference indicates this article. The other reference is David mentioning Jigglypuff, though not official confirmations.--Richard (Talk - Contribs) 22:02, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Your bolded text indicates where we will object. We do not deal in rumors on Wikipedia. Leave that to the Super Smash Bros. Wiki. Coreycubed 22:18, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

text: Richard, your heart's in the right place -- but even sourced speculation is still that. We're all well aware of the content you're talking about, and have already made the decision not to include it in the article in any form. Sorry. Coreycubed  —Preceding comment was added at 22:30, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah I guess. Never mind then.--Richard (Talk - Contribs) 22:43, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for an edit 

message: Someone should fix that.BobbyBritish 00:51, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I noticed that too. I'll get right on it once the page is unlocked.Satoryu 01:06, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The External Links section lists smashbros.com twice