lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hundred Schools of Thought

message: Improvements to the English have been made by many contributors. I do not see anything wrong with the English now. Ought not the administrators remove this article from the "need copy-editing" category? PM Poon 08:51, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm doing a bit more tidying & copy-editing, then I'll remove the notice (but it doesn't take an admin to do it). --Mel Etitis  (Μελ Ετητης) 16:15, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Copy editing

message: The content of Hundred Schools of Thought and Chinese philosophy are similar in content.
In hundred schools of thought, might it be more useful to give the definitions of the stated texts, and direct users to the Chinese philosophy page for the overviews? Because if I can, that's what I'll try and do if there's no objection, moving relevant material to the other page. Otherwise, if we do not want to have the book statements, we've just got duplicate pages here, and they ought to be merged. I also think it's very unscholarly to list them according to original source and then give a modern commentary, whereas people might actually appreciate having the statements of the books themselves at hand.FourLights (talk) 17:55, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Hundred Schools and Chinese philosophy

message: اا ٨غعغا خ ه 196.155.4.21 (talk) 12:46, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  ٥
Talk:Thomas Brodie-Sangster

message: There is disagreement as to whether Brodie-Sangster is British or English. Could this be discussed here, and a consensus achieved, rather than continuously edit warring over it? Thanks. --‖ Ebyabe talk - Border Town ‖ 01:43, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, there appears to be an extensive discussion on this topic at Talk:Adele. --‖ Ebyabe talk - Inspector General ‖ 01:53, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

text: With regards to WP:MOSIDENTITY, in this interview when asked about a favorite car, Brodie-Sangster says The obvious choice would be a dark green coupe, 1963 Jaguar E-type – I’m quite English. OhNoitsJamie Talk 03:23, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  British vs English 

message: In relationship with Elon Musk's Ex wife, Talulah Riley. Rustygecko (talk) 23:02, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personal life? 

message: Hi why are we editing out oclcs which can be valuable to find an article in a publicationScranton (talk) 17:50, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  oclcs 

message: When did he start using the name Brodie-Sangster, and where did it come from? In his early films he is credited as Thomas Sangster, or sometimes Thomas Brodie Sangster. cagliost (talk) 17:39, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brodie
Talk:A Course of Pure Mathematics

message: No, introduction to mathematical analysis.  Charles Matthews 21:50, 7 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
File talk:Wfm mackintosh lighthouse.jpg

message: Before anyone complains, this absolutely is the best angle I can get on this building without the use of a helicopter. It's bordered on one side by an incredibly dark narrow lane (filled with signage for a sushi restaurant) and by a pretty narrow street (with a nasty NCP carpark blocking the good angles). -- Finlay McWalter |  Talk 22:14, 7 May 2004 (UTC)
Template talk:Melanesia

message: #West Papua is the English name for West Papua and has been for over forty years; irrespective of whatever Indonesia calls it; this is NOT an Indonesian language version of Wikipedia.
#Papua is the name of New Guinea, the Island. Both halves, not one half.
#IF you wanted to use the Indonesian name then you need to use the entire name which is Propinsi Papua Indonesia. There is NO such thing as 'Papua Province', that is pure fiction in any language.
:I was satisfied to call it Indonesian Papua Province, or some suchness hoping people would be able to guess West Papua was meant, but as the subject is brought up; the correct name for English users to be able to identify the region is West Papua.Daeron 22:16, 7 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Duke of Chandos

message: This page re-directs to a ghost-link. 66.32.76.38 22:48, 7 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: You're a bit too fast for me.  It should be fine now. Mackensen 23:07, 7 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: :
Abeyance implies the possibility of revival, usually (are there exceptions?) because the claim fell to two or more sisters; but the last duke had only one daughter.  His article says the Chandos barony went dormant (meaning a further heir is possible but unidentified, because the title was created in times of poor records) and the other titles extinct. —Tamfang (talk) 04:07, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  abeyant or extinct?
Talk:Constitution of the United Kingdom

message: In the first paragraph of the lead section, the "upholding of international law" is mentioned as a constitutional principle. The case of R v Lyons (UKHL 44 [2002]) is mentioned to support that. That is a misundertanding of the judgement, and can lead to a wrong conclusion on the part ofd the reader of the wiki article. While it is true that the opinions expressed by the Lords in the said judgement assert that british common law is to be interpreted in accordance with international law, it is equally true that international law is not part of UK law. 
The UK has what is called a "transformation" system of reception of international norms (as opposed to States which have a direct reception system). This means that an international treaty can only become part of domestic law via an Act of Parliament (see wiki page on international legal dualism). 
Furthermore, judges can only use international law to interpret UK law if and when "free to do so" (Attorney-General v Guardian Newspapers Ltd (No.2) [1990] 1 AC 109, 283). This means that they cannot do so in direct contravention of the will of Parliament, as that would be a violation of the principle of parliamentary sovereignty. This is precisely the reasoning that is followed in R v Lyons. For instance, Lord Hermann states that "In domestic law, the courts are obliged to give effect to the law as enacted by Parliament. This obligation is entirely unaffected by international law." (para. 40). Lord Millett said that European Court of Human Rights judgements "ha[ve] not been incorporated into our domestic law so as to be directly enforceable by individuals [...] while a judgment of the ECtHR is binding on the United Kingdom, it is not directly binding as a matter of our domestic law on the courts" (paras. 104-105). 
I suggest the last sentence of the leading paragraph should reflect Lord Millett's position on the principles of the UK Constitution "the governing principles are the separation of powers, the supremacy of Parliament, and the independence of the judiciary". I also suggest the "internationalism" subsection should be amended to reflect the above. 139.47.42.191 (talk) 16:59, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  International law and the Constitution 

message: The present text of the article states that "While Parliament had nearly uncontested military power before..."
I don't even understand what this means.  Parliament, as such, has not had any military power since the English Civil War, and even then it was hardly 'uncontested'.  I assume that the word 'military' has crept in by mistake, but I can't think what it was meant to be.2A00:23C5:6492:8D01:E888:73F3:7B76:A0AD (talk) 14:06, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Military power of Parliament??
Talk:Military aid to the civil power

message: Someone who is familiar with the topic should explain the difference between this and Martial Law, and include information about the American National Guard and the Corps of Engineers. Sadly, that person is not me. Rhymeless 00:15, 8 May 2004 (UTC)

message: Is Military Aid to the Civil Community different to Military Aid to the Civil Power in some way? Or should these two articles be merged? If they shouldn't be, they could do with having the differences explained, as I'm really confused… — OwenBlacker 23:02, Sep 23, 2004 (UTC)
:Based on my reading of the articles, Military Aid to the Civil Power is about law and order - helping the civil power, i.e. government. Military Aid to the Civil Community is about the needs of the community, in emergencies. --Singkong2005 00:37, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Military Aid to the Civil Community]] 

message: " Air policing is a traditional task of the German Air Force."
This is incorrect. Air policing was specifically excluded from the German Air Force's role under occupation (which I suppose, is as 'traditional' as one gets in the Federal Republic). Air policing was undertaken by the RAF and USAF until reunification. I'm sure somebody can research what exactly the situation was between then and the passing of the Luftsicherheitsgesetz. Methinks the occupying forces assuming the role probably blindsided legislators as to the constitutional issues.Sir smellybeard (talk) 13:10, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:   Air policing in Germany
Talk:Nasiriyah

message: As habitual in the english wikipedia, the population you gave is the districte population, NOT the city population. Unluckely the mistake was translated to many wikipedias. Please correct it. --88.16.141.255 (talk) 11:38, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Population

message: Date of fundation is quoted as 1840. But the real date is 1872. I corrected it.--88.16.141.255 (talk) 11:59, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Foundation

message: Is there really no picture available that shows something more representative of this city than a water treatment plant?! --Tim Landscheidt (talk) 03:01, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: Is the last editorial effort by Hendi67 a vandalic action or just an in good faith error? Carlotm (talk) 19:00, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Vandalism. --Al Ameer (talk) 17:11, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandal or what else?
Talk:Mumps

message: There is no link supporting the statement that mumps vaccination was recommended against by UK bodies until 1987 (???).
Possibly this is a misunderstanding of the fact that no single mumps vaccination was approved in the UK until 1988. Mumps vaccination was normally delivered as part of MMR. This left parents who preferred the application of standalone vaccinations with no option to vaccinate against mumps.
Can someone who is an authority (or at least has more information than me), either remove this bizarre claim or substantiate it with a source.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.108.87.14 (talk) 00:37, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added a source. Tornado chaser (talk) 03:41, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Problem with that source is 1) it is primary 2) we contained the content before the source did so could simple be copied from use. 3) never heard of that journal. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 18:21, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I have updated with a better ref. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 18:28, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks, sorry that I didn't look into the source more. Tornado chaser (talk) 21:54, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  UK Advice Recommending Against Vaccination
Talk:Nuray Hafiftaş

message: Hi Nodnolku,
I have enjoyed your article on Nuray Hafiftas, and have helped you a little by copy-editing the spelling. Hope you don't mind. Just one thing I don't know, what is saz? Is that a particular style of singing? Perhaps you can clarify that for non-Turkish readers. Many thanks Dieter Simon 01:26, 8 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hi
Talk:John Digweed

message: I added a snippet about Bedrock as a production alias.  I'll try and remember to expand on that later. --Starx 01:57, 8 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hi I don't know if this is the place to suggest this, but it would be nice for DJs like Digweed to go a bit into just what they do, like do they actually create music, add sounds to music, just adjust tempos and mix, or what? This would be interesting on a DJ by DJ basis, which is why my comment is here in the Talk:John Digweed page.
Daniel Rosenstark 04:39, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestion

message: Intro says "born ... on 1 January 1977" while the fact box says "Born 	1 January 1967 (1967-01-01) (age 44)". Which is it? -- 25 March 2011  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.140.49.163 (talk) 18:16, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Which birth decade?

message: I saw this page listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject_Electronic_music.  I have a great image that I took of John at his show in Honolulu. I will upload it to wikimedia commons asap and put it up there.- Check out my user page for the rest of my photos. Photocyclone (talk) 21:22, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Image
Talk:Mount Ararat

message: The article states that the mount is outside "modern Armenia". I think it would be better to say "current" because "modern" could be taken to mean the modern period (1492-1789).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.71.160.34 (talk) 12:29, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing adjective? 

message: Using the North American name (Wisconsinan) for the last glaciation seems a bit odd for a mountain in West Asia. There might be one for Asia, but if not I'd use the Alpine W\"urm which is at least geographically closer. Or just say Last Glaciation. 2A01:CB08:4E:8A00:74AA:1A08:58DC:A2C3 (talk) 11:51, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Glaciation name 

message: Or something similar, maybe "Origin of the mythology"? Banderson1962 (talk) 06:38, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shouldn't "Origin of the tradition" be "Origin of the folklore"?
Talk:Toll road

message: The article claims that BOT (Build-Operate-Transfer) toll roads are prevalent in Canada. This is untrue. The article 'List of Toll Roads' list many structures in Canada claimed as toll roads. I am familiar only with Ontario, where only one such road exists to the best of my knowledge, Highway 407. That is hardly 'prevalent.' The list also includes many bridges, which are not toll roads, but toll bridges, surely a different category. All but one listing for Ontario are bridges, none of which are BOT structures. Again, prevalence is overstated, in the province with the highest population in Canada. I suggest that 'Canada' be removed from the list in this article as a location where BOT is 'prevalent.'  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Grandma Roses (talk • contribs) 20:44, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prevalence in Canada 

message: I tagged the "Collection methods" as too biased on the United States (only foreign mention is on Ontario, Canada). The examples shown are mostly those in the United States and no other foreign mention can be seen here.  TagaSanPedroAko (talk) 09:19, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Collection methods" too US-centric 

message: This statement is made in the article: "Maryland Route 200 and the Triangle Expressway in North Carolina were the first toll roads built without toll booths, with drivers charged via ETC or by optical license plate recognition and are billed by mail." This statement is false without qualification. Both of these tool roads started operating in 2011. Ontario Highway 407 started operating, totally without toll booths, in 1997, many years before the US highways. Indeed, a paragraph later starts with "Highway 407 in the province of Ontario, Canada, has no toll booths, and instead reads a transponder […]" The statement about the US toll roads needs to be qualified or corrected. Chamblyen (talk) 02:59, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect statement 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Peaje. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 18#Peaje until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Steel1943 (talk) 19:48, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Peaje" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Rescue archaeology

message: Does the title of this page need to capitalized? --Smack 03:10, 8 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: The field archaeology that occurs in Japan and Korea is largely emergency archaeology. I have edited the article to reflect this. Mumun 無文 14:25, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  added K and J 

message: Lead: "Rescue archaeology ... is state-sanctioned, for-profit..."
Not so. Maybe in the US? At least in Israel, and quite likely in other countries too, it is quite the opposite of "for-profit": the construction contractor or landlord would have to pay from his own pocket for the national archaeological authority to execute the dig (unless that is understood to be "for-profit", which it's not; just covers the costs). Arminden (talk) 09:05, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not "for-profit" 

message: "Many European countries, such as, e.g., Germany, practice virtually no rescue excavation (though there is extensive research archaeology)."
So what happens when construction work hits on archaeologically important findings? Statement is a) unsourced, and b) factually wrong; at the very least wrongly worded, maybe means to say: construction is halted and the excavation is executed as a research dig – but it doesn't say that. I know for a fact from specific sites that in Germany that is very much the case.  It also contradicts the previous sentence: "largely restricted to... Western Europe", of which Germany is quite a large part. Arminden (talk) 09:07, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "No rescue excavation in Germany, other European countries": wrong, at least as a general statement 

message: "The term, and indeed the practice of, is largely restricted to North America, South America, Western Europe, and East Asia..."
What about the Levant? Israel is a focal point of international archaeological work, and rescue archaeology is a central part of its relevant legislation, derived from both Zionist interest in the topic, and British Mandate traditions. Jordan also has it, for similar reasons. We should look into and check about former French mandate areas such as Syria. The distinction might need to be made between what the law says and how well it is implemented.
What about Egypt?
With the Southern Levant and Egypt, two of the most archaeologically essential parts of the world are left out of the article, which has an undue focus on UK and US. This is a major flaw of the article.
 hi. I see you are among the last Mohicans among those who've contributed more substantially to the article, maybe you want to look into these issues. You might also know who else to ping about it. Thanks, Arminden (talk) 09:33, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undue, strict UK & US focus. Israel and Jordan have it, maybe more of the Levant; Egypt?
Talk:Raw foodism

message: Does anyone else find this statement reductive and dismissive? How about something like: "Many claims made by raw food proponents could be categorized as pseudoscientific." It just doesn't make sense to insinuate that every claim made by a raw food proponent is pseudoscientific.   Wowisaac (talk) 06:09, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Wowisaac This article is not written with a neutral point of view. 143.55.89.242 (talk) 18:59, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Claims made by raw food proponents are pseudoscientific." 

message: The redirect A Hovannessian has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 15:00, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:A Hovannessian]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect Living foods diet has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Utopes (talk / cont) 05:17, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Living foods diet]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Chinese Cubans

message: Most of this article appears to be a cut and paste from http://www.chcp.org/BarrioChino.html
http://www.chcp.org/copyright.html  -- —Preceding unsigned comment added by Niteowlneils (talk • contribs) at 23:42, 7 May 2004
The claim that there are "only about 500" Chinese-Cubans appears to be grossly inaccurate.  For example, the 2006 World Almanac says that Chinese-Cubans account for 1% of Cuba's population of over 11 million.  Even if the Almanac is off by a factor of 10, this still means more than 20 times as many Chinese-Cubans as the article states. -- —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.145.98.94 (talk • contribs) 04:12, 20 November 2006
:Maybe they are trying to distinguish between pure-blooded Chinese, and those more mixed. -- Beardo 17:58, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: ovA_165443 (talk) 15:01, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Copy
Talk:Ring of Kerry

message: I've taken out most of the external links.  <BR>
There is no "official" Ring of Kerry website, the one that claimed to be is only a well-known internet travel company based near Killarney.<BR>
The Kerry Way site belongs on that page.<BR>
The photo gallery seems legit for the page.<BR>
"My Ring of Kerry" is spam only, and added nothing to the article.<BR>
The 2 remaining sites have some text of interest and have been left there.--Dmol (talk) 18:41, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trimmed spam external links.
Talk:Catholic views on God

message: This was originally inserted in Divine, but since it's specifically about the Catholic perspective, I moved it here. And I have checked the sourse, The Catholic Encyclopedia is public domain. What this article needs is a good going-over for wikification, format, and a little NPOV. Have fun. Alcarillo 04:27, 8 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: formatted it a bit. I hope it's better now. Sid 17:22, 8 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Please see Talk:God in Catholicism. PPEMES (talk) 14:35, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Merged. PPEMES (talk) 15:48, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge?