lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:KHMT

message: :Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
*Oppose.  KHMT has other uses.  All of the links currently point to the correct article.  KHMT should be a dab.  The correct form to dab the station is KHMT (TV). Vegaswikian 06:29, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: Per the WP:Disambig page, "If only a primary topic and one other topic require disambiguation, then disambiguation links are sufficient, and a disambiguation page is unnecessary." Since the television station call letters are the primary identification and the ICAO code reference to an airport is a secondary identification, a hat note is sufficient and requires no more steps than would a disambiguation page for people seeking the airport. It's not about which subject is more famous, just that the television station is primarily identified by this name while the airport is primarily identified by its full name with the ICAO code only a secondary reference to that airport. - Dravecky (talk) 05:39, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rationale for deletion of disambiguation page

message: The 1993 move of ABC from channel 4 to channel 6 is almost identical to how Knoxville’s WTVK moved to channel 8 as WKXT-TV, now WVLT-TV. Also similar to how KDLT-TV in Sioux Falls moved from channel 5 to channel 42. I believe it would be more accurate to say t KSVI signed on in 1980 on channel 4 and moved to channel 6 in 1993, while KHMT is basically a new station that signed on in 1985. HangingCurveSwing for the fence 13:02, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: No objections, so changing pages accordingly. HangingCurveSwing for the fence 02:10, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to move pre-1993 history to KSVI
Talk:KIMA-TV

message: Hello, Please do not add unreferenced names as entries to the list of former employees in articles. Including this type of material in articles does not abide by current consensus and its inclusion is strongly discouraged in our policies and guidelines. The rationales are as follows:
#WP:NOT tells us, Wikipedia is "not an indiscriminate collection of information."  As that section describes, just because something is true, doesn't necessarily mean the info belongs in Wikipedia.  
#As per WP:V, we cannot include information in Wikipedia that is not verifiable and sourced. 
# WP:Source list tells us that lists included within articles (including people's names) are subject to the same need for references as any other information in the article. 
#Per WP:BLP, we have to be especially careful about including un-sourced info about living persons.
If you look at articles about companies in general, you will not find mention of previous employees, except in those cases where the employee was particularly notable.  Even then, the information is not presented just as a list of names, but is incorporated into the text itself (for example, when a company's article talks about the policies a previous CEO had, or when they mention the discovery/invention of a former engineer/researcher). If a preexisting article is already in the encyclopedia for the person you want to add to a list, it's generally regarded as sufficient to support their inclusion in list material in another article. cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 17:44, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding unreferenced entries of former employees to lists containing BLP material
Talk:Bourgeois nationalism

message: The part about the Soviet Union possibly shouldn't be there.  But I think it's a good example, so I won't edit it out.  --Rev. Austin 05:15, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: Hello,
When looking for a primary source to support the definition put forward for Bourgeois Nationalism to share with my class, I couldn't find one.
The definition of the term is not cited in the article.  When I searched for Bourgeois Nationalism I came up with its application to Estonia during the Soviet era.  Estonia
While this does not preclude its application to Marxist theory, the definitions of many of the words defining the term (nationality, race, ethnicity) were understood very differently by Marx and Engels than they would have been in the USSR.  The meanings of the terms were still developing, as I think the article attached below demonstrates.  Article by Erik van Ree
I've seen the Bourgeois Nationalism Wikipedia article cited on a Reddit thread and just think it is a little misleading to apply the definition of the term to Marx as it suggests Marx was working with a different understanding of nationality, race, and ethnicity.  Definitions that had be refined in the World and Soviet context over the course of up to 70 years, and then applied as Soviet policy.  The van Ree article seems to suggest that Marx viewed nationality, race, and ethnicity as a byproduct of his materialist leanings, a result of inequality.  The definition and Soviet application from Estonia seem to suggest that nationality, race, and ethnicity were holdovers that extended inequality.
It may seem a minor point, but I think it is important to differentiate between Marxism as an economic theory and communism as an adaptation and political application of that theory.  I think that sort of nuance benefits my students.  Applying this definition to Marx is problematic.
I am by no means an expert in this.  I look forward from hearing from and being educated by someone who knows more.
Thank you,
Social Studies Helper (talk) 01:30, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition seems misleading as it is applied to Marxism
Talk:Osaka Prefecture

message: A survey is being conducted at Wikipedia_talk:Manual of Style (Japan-related_articles)#Prefectures and macrons to determine which prefectures should have their spelling "macron-ized", per the existing manual of style.  Oita has been changed already, and each of the others is current being discussed (Tokyo, Osaka, Kyoto, Hokkaido, Hyogo, and Kochi).  Please join the discussion if you wish.  Neier 00:33, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  spelling of prefectures 
Talk:Vasyl Avramenko

message: One disputed fact: Avramenko currently lives in New York. I only assume this because he owns a dance studio there. Mrrria 05:24, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: http://www.oseredok.org/ucec/sites/main.asp?P=1E88BFOSDF7 tells that he died in 1981. If he is alive, he should be 111 years old now. It is to much. Probably some relative inherited his studio abakharev 05:45, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

text: Oh dear! Well thanks for clearing that up. I searched for a death date but with no luck, so I had just assumed. Mrrria 05:48, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Only the Ukrainian Wiki lists him as Kyrylovych (sp?). Does anyone have anything else that lists him as such? None of my biographical materials verify this name.--tufkaa 20:25, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: Avramenko is listed under :Category:Ukrainian-Americans and :Category:Ukrainian Canadians. He travelled and worked in Canada and the States, but did he actually have Canadian and American citizenship? Should he be kept under these categories? Editor at Large 00:58, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Citizenship
Talk:Amyloblast

message: I believe "amyloblast", as previously described in the article, referred to "ameloblast" since the descriptions were nearly identical.  Though amyloblast may be a mispelling or an alternate spelling, the ameloblast article is the older of the two, and so turning this one into a redirect was appropriate. - Dozenist talk 05:30, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Ameloblast]]
Talk:Loop bin duplicator

message: I have two questions:
1. my understanding was that the signal was transferred by actually running the source tape in physical contact with the blank through a transfer head which carried a very weak bias signal which copied the signal across. The article currently doesn't mention this, and the assumption would be that the signals are transferred electronically (which may also be the case I guess).
:As far as I know, this method is only used for video tape duplication since there is only once side to a video tape.  Audio cassettes have an A and B side and copying them as you describe would be impossible.Jimberg98 22:10, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, cassette tapes are also duplicated in the method you mentioned by having the tape in contact with the source tape and passing a weak bias signal through the two layers of tape, however, this method of cassette duplication is of a much lower quality than the method employing a loop bin duplicator, which is completely electronic (functioning much like the high-speed dubbing feature of a dual cassette deck, but much more sophisticated), and yields much better-sounding duplicated cassettes.  This is the method that most of the major record labels use for duplicating albums onto the cassette.  As far as using a wider tape, this is due to being that the wider the tape is, the better the reproduced sound will be from it.  And with duplicating to a small 1/8" size tape like that used by cassettes, the audio quality needs to be quite high in order to utilize the maximum quality 1/8" tape can provide. misternuvistor 20:35, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

text: I've updated this article with a little more detail on how it works.  I was the chief software engineer for Duplitronics, the company that held the patent for digital bins before it was found invalid.Jimberg98 22:10, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Lamin Khalifah Fhimah

message: Can anyone throw some light on why the name is spelt differently at the leader? Seems also that many external sources spell the name as LAMEN. Please discuss.  --Cyber Fox (talk) 10:36, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name difference? 

message: Do any editors have a free usage photo to add to this article? --Cyber Fox (talk) 10:48, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo? 
Talk:Sole

message: I think sole (the bottom of the foot) warrants its own page. I'm sure there's anatomy and other things that could written on. Maybe later... Westfall 05:40, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

message: 'It is the most flexible physical representation of pure solar and light energy. When water and crystal salt come together they become a different product, Sole.'
???
What is this? It doesn't contain a reference to anywhere, and sounds rather nonsensical. I suggest removing it until someone can provide a link to a relevant page on Wikipedia; or at least say what it's being classified under.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.70.156.254 (talk) 19:25, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Odd' definitions 

message: Should we not add sole (currency) to this page? Or no? TattØØdẄaitre§ lĖTŝ tÅLĶ 03:52, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  should we not add sole (currency) to this page
Talk:Darkcore

message: Have attempted a small re-write of this, attempting to keep it very concise and short, using the Reynolds refs where possible plus refs that relate to all of the notable releases mentioned here plus more. It had over time mutated somewhat.
A quick note: Have added a distinguish for the later use of Darkcore within Hardcore (electronic dance music genre). Darkcore (or darkside hardcore, or dark hardcore) was very much first used in late 1992 as that sub-genre of Breakbeat hardcore. 
There's some crossover with this and what was often dubbed Hardcore jungle. That phase of 1993 where hardcore and jungle was still experimenting and before you would really class a tune as jungle or Drum and bass. That said, all these genre names end up a little imperfect to describe such a wealth of influences and interwoven sounds in the music. Thanks Altlondon (talk) 18:52, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Small re-write 

message: I removed a long list of examples per Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Music#Lists which says we should not be hosting a list of performers in any genre article. A list of song examples is much the same thing. 
There was also a problem with referencing, so I removed some poor quality references such as Discogs which is not reliable per WP:ALBUMAVOID.
After a reversion by  I reworked the bare list into prose per MOS:LISTBASICS, throwing out the entries that were not mentioned in the remaining references, and the ones that were listing non-notable artists such as Babylon Timewarp and FBD Project. If an artist has not gained notability for their influence in the genre then they should not be listed. (WP:LISTPEOPLE touches upon the question of who to list, settling on only the notable ones.) 
So let's stick to prose descriptions and avoid listing people who are not notable. Let's stick to reliable sources. Binksternet (talk) 19:17, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: List of examples
Talk:The Girl from Petrovka

message: The link above contains a passage almost identical to the "Trivia" section.  Plagarism, on one end or the other?
The above is me.  Sorry, wasn't logged in.--DoctorWorm 03:44, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The copyrighted material has been removed. - Alan Smithee 06:51, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagarism?
Talk:Wildcats (film)

message: At just after 49 minutes into the movie, the main character (Goldie Hawn) enters a bar seeking last year's missing star quarterback to enlist. On the wall to the right of the door as she enters are police propaganda stickers (which immediately seem out of place, because directors are purposeful about what shows in a shot, and instinct told me right away that such propaganda would NOT actually manage to stay posted in such a bar in reality (it was supposed to be a rough gangster kind of hangout)).  - The 2nd poster down was a "McGruff The Crime Dog" sticker, and in the middle of it, very clearly, a police-light blue light appears for long enough to not be able to call it 'subliminal' propaganda, but hey, come on. I mean, I understand "product placement" and maybe the movie company was payed to slip this stuff in, but..well at this point I'll stop before I indicate what I think of this kind of propaganda being hidden in our media to brainwash people (but hey, that's what it was.) 
POINT: someone who knows how to edit better than I should add a section and note this happened. Thank you.
HERE'S PICTURES:
http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8593/15995486434_ca97f06860_b.jpg
http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8671/16430480998_72d235c76e_b.jpg
http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8562/16431874639_beab176088_b.jpg
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SECOND POINT: It might be of interest to Goldie Hawn fans (specifically male boomers who saw her walking about in her panties for 20 minutes, in her 60's movie 'Butterflies Are Free') that in this movie we see her nude finally.  I'm not going to add an edit to point this out myself, because I don't trust I yet have enough experience editing to present such a note in an expository style that doesn't just sound like Beavis ruminating about what he saw. But it is a legitimate part of documenting movies to note which of hers she appears nude in. And I am sure it was a big deal to us at the time, to see her beauty exposed; we appreciated it as the adults we had become by the 80's. 
AND THIRD POINT: The critics didn't like this, but we did! (isn't that often the case?)
Charlie Fiftywatts (talk) 23:13, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  propaganda was semi-hidden in this movie to affect people's minds
Talk:Dollars (film)

message: In the Cast list, the links for the actor Bob Herron jump to a Robert Herron who is not the actor in the film $.  67.187.247.164 (talk) 17:29, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: moved   (non-admin closure)  JC7V (talk) 22:35, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: $ (film) →  – Per WP:MOSTM.  Not without precedent per  and this DVD release.  Per the AFI:  --woodensuperman 14:54, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

text: I am personally veering towards supporting the proposal, given the inherent difficulty in determining the common name. Betty Logan (talk) 14:40, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Good analysis, and I like the dog's dinner phrase (never heard that one). Yet the long-term stable title also being the official title, and that it is easily understandable and fits the other title criteria, it's $'s to donuts that leaving it as is may be the route to go. Randy Kryn (talk) 16:42, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

text: *Gansta isn't a similar example (same name, just changed from all caps to single capped). Then there are many ? albums and films, and even a tv episode ? (Lost). Would you name each of those long-term stable titles "question mark"? Or & (album)? And saying this is covered in WP:TRADEMARK is really a long stretch (is '$' even something that can be trademarked?), and you could easily discuss the "other side" of that one. Randy Kryn (talk) 10:54, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 11 December 2018
Talk:Protocol (film)

message: If anyone has the movie promotional poster for this movie, it would be greatly appreciatedCattona 13:28, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo needed 

message: How do we assure that pictures used in article(s) are copyright free?..I added a picture but it was removed,and i was told it was copyrighted,and given a warning. Danyecurry 14:23, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  How can we make sure pictures...
Talk:Nashville Fairgrounds Speedway

message: The real reason NASCAR left this track is that it was controlled by the Fair Board, which was in that era a dumping ground for the most corrupt and disreputable supporters of whoever was mayor at the time, and they had to be bought off to get anything approved at the Fairgrounds, including a racing contract. By 1984, NASCAR was a big-time enough operation with lots of racing venues clamoring for it to come to their track and no need to deal with these small-time crooks.
Also, the Fair Board had a policy of not allowing any lease terms over five years, meaning that no operator could make serious, long-term investment in the facility since if they were to do so, they might not get the lease in the future and would lose that investment.  72.106.155.46 (talk) 10:38, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Please support your claims with reliable sources if you would like to see it included on the page. Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 13:54, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why NASCAR left 

message: Given that it's among the most prestigious and history-rich short track races in the country, I think the All American 400 is worthy of its own page. IndySteve (talk) 22:20, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  All American 400
Talk:The City in the Sea

message: Okay, the analysis section is completely original research so sources are needed. Some of it was added by me so it's partly my fault. But, I'd like to recommend that no additions be made until sources are added for what is already there. For example, the last lines are analyzed twice in very different ways (as an aside, the second analysis is from someone who I think is a sockpuppet of a formal vandal trying to reform). Anyway, let's just go through whatever sources we may have and add it all in there so there's some semblance of credibility to this article. --Midnightdreary 15:51, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure if I agree with all of the analysis, I'll see what I can do. -RiverHockey 13:58, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Really, all we need is sourced analysis from published scholars. I'm sure there's stuff out there. If I remember, I might do some digging later today or tonight. --Midnightdreary 15:53, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I got started a little bit. I left the original research up there for now, until we fill in. So far what I've added is pretty basic. If you've got better sources, jump right in! --Midnightdreary 00:16, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Analysis
Talk:Dassault Aviation

message: This item in the list links to Falcon 20, I've never heard of a Falcon 30 and I've flown every model from the 10 to the 7X. I think it should be removed. Avi8tor (talk) 14:42, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Apparently, they only made one. But since it did exist, we should keep the link, and it is mentioned  (very briefly) in the Falcon 20 article. BilCat (talk) 19:52, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

text: French Wikipedia has an article on it at fr:Dassault Falcon 30. BilCat (talk) 00:24, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  There is this page on Dassault's website on the Falcon 30, which looks fairly detailed, and a five page article in the March 2008 issue of the French aviation magazine Le Fana de l'Aviation. The entry in the 74–75 Janes is about a page - so again decent coverage - I think that a viable article could be produced for the Falcon 30/Mystére 40 (the same aircraft but cramming in 40 passengers and operating over shorter stages). In the meantime it seems sensible to keep the link (and perhaps expand the coverage in the Falcon 20 article so that the link makes more sense).Nigel Ish (talk) 09:07, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  Bilcat asked me if fr:Dassault Falcon 30 had enough cited content to add to en:Dassault Falcon 20. As is often the case on wikipedia fr, the references are quite poorly used and it should be better to start from scratch, from the Dassault and Jane's refs above. Le Fana de l'Aviation is OK (but the similar air-fan.fr is better!). The Falcon 20 section could be expended before a separate article could be split. Cheers, --Marc Lacoste (talk) 15:04, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  Air Fan appears to me to be more dedicated to Military aircraft, so might not be too useful in this case - this is another case where we really miss the Flight International and Aviation Week archives no longer being available.Nigel Ish (talk) 15:32, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've created a draft at User:Nigel Ish/Sandbox Dassault Falcon 30 - now I just need someone with appropriate move rights to move it over the redirect.Nigel Ish (talk) 17:50, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  Now live at Dassault Falcon 30.Nigel Ish (talk) 18:07, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks Nigel! Looks good. And thanks to User:Avi8tor (seriously) for making the post that got this all started. This is what collaboration on Wikipedia is all about. It's an interesting what-might-have-been, but apparently too ahead of its time. BilCat (talk) 18:45, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Very good work all of you, I had no idea this aircraft even existed. I've got a History of Dassault book somewhere but it's packed away while I renovate. Avi8tor (talk) 06:26, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Falcon 30
Talk:Pasta de Conchos mine disaster

message: The referencing in this article is wrong. The numbering goes up to 9, but there are only 5 items listed at the end. I tried to fix all the footnotes and got myself so confused, and didn't save anything after a few previews. I give up. Can anyone more familiar with footnotes take over, please ? -- PFHLai 06:02, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, how do you cite two unique facts from one article? Mike H. That's hot 06:08, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I don't know. Listing the source more than once at the end ? But then each time a different tag has to be used .... I'm lost .... -- PFHLai 06:11, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I can do a different ref but I just thought that sort of thing would defeat the purpose. If that's all I have to do it'll be relatively easy to change. I can do it tomorrow. Mike H. That's hot 06:19, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

text: I changed to the (now) normal ref style. Lubrom (talk) 18:27, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Multiple footnotes to the same reference will not work: you must insert two uniquely named footnotes." 