lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Morbillivirus

message: "There are currently six species in this genus,"
But it does not list what they are. That would be a good thing to add to the article.
96.41.41.75 (talk) 03:53, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  What are the species? 

message: morbirus 190.237.48.40 (talk) 04:01, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Morbius virus
Talk:Human metapneumovirus

message: doi:10.1128/CMR.00081-15 JFW | T@lk 08:36, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modulation of immune response 

message: The 'Epidemiology' section has some pretty massive overciting. While there's nothing wrong with that, I know that it is generally discouraged. Can someone with expertise in these matters either expand the section to spread out what each specific ref is citing, or trim them down to the most relevant cites? I have zero expertise in these disciplines, so I can't make an informed judgement as to what is most relevant. Anastrophe (talk) 22:42, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Excessive cites 

message: Post Covid patients respiratory response and length of illness to this virus seems much more severe than to those never infected with Covid 2600:6C40:1300:5BE1:564:19E8:99C4:27D1 (talk) 01:41, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Source? Citation? Anything more than just a random claim? Anastrophe (talk) 03:20, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Post Covid respiratory response to to this virus 

message: Afaik, Wikipedia does not speak in terms of first person pronouns. Several sections have "We ..." passages. I am in to place to correct this myself. Ellenor2000 (talk) 22:18, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: If you're willing, yes please. They're probably the result of just broad copying from the original papers without rewording.  cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 04:14, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can we justify a "this article has at least one issue?" 

message: The article should stick to one or the other in my opinion. I don't know which one is the 'official' designation. There are 59 iterations of the character string in the article (including in refs). 25 are "HMPV", 34 are "hMPV".  cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 03:33, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vacillation between "hMPV" and "HMPV"
Talk:Dale Buggins

message: Reverted bot revert to reinstate research and expanded article. 
I fully fleshed out Dale Buggins article with references - am experienced editor tho currently back as a url as yet. Consider the bot reversing everything to a home made subjective stub without all these things is not good for the article. Do not intend an edit war, but for some reason can't access the message through the bar 110.33.16.128 (talk) 01:16, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  can't access message & so justify myself here 

message: Removed specific unacceptable link, so should be okay now. And made start class in both cats.  110.33.16.128 (talk) 02:01, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Update
Talk:Holy Cross Church (Chicago)

message: Maybe better name would be Holy Cross Church, Chicago? Article also lacks references. M.K. 11:14, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ... Or Holy Cross Church in Chicago.  There is also a Holy Cross Hospital in Chicago next to a Chicago park called Marquette Park.  This Hospital is also associated with Lithuanians.  Holy Cross in Chicago should become a disambiguation page after a move is made to accommodate a possible article on the Hospital.  H Padleckas (talk) 03:15, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I have moved Holy Cross in Chicago to Holy Cross Church in Chicago and have converted Holy Cross in Chicago into a Disambiguation page leading to Holy Cross Church in Chicago or Holy Cross Hospital (Chicago).  Holy Cross Church, Chicago has been made a Redirect to Holy Cross Church in Chicago.  H Padleckas (talk) 10:06, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Scatter matrix

message: Here are some arguments in favour of keeping the topic scatter matrix independent of other topics:
1. I feel the scatter matrix is a more fundamental and more clearly defined statistic than sample covariance. With the former there is no ambiguity about the normalization. With the latter, you always have to ask whether it has been normalized by N or by N-1, or perhaps by some other number. 
If someone looks in wikipedia to find out what is scatter matrix, this article gives a succinct definition and then links to applications, like sample covariance, covariance estimation and Wishart distribution. 
2. The scatter matrix is used in other wikipedia articles (and could be used in still more), not just in the sample covariance article.
Entropeneur 07:23, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment on proposal to merge with article on [[sample covariance]] 

message: In this article we read:
  The scatter matrix is the m-by-m positive semi-definite matrix
but no where in the subsequent mathematical definition does m appear.  One understands that an implicit Einstein summation notation maybe in force here, but to no benefit for the reader.
It isn't given here how the scatter matrix is distinct from the closely related covariance matrix.  In fact, if one flips back and forth between the wikipedia pages for the two topics one could easily become convinced that they are one and the same; despite the standard deviation being the critical difference.  Perhaps one can creditably state: a covariance matrix normalizes for variation within a variant, whereas a correlation matrix normalizes for both variation within a variant and (via 'standardizing' the deviation) between variants.  That is, the covariance matrix is 1d normalized, the correlation matrix is 2d normalized; and a scatter matrix isn't normalized at all.
And/or it might be worthy to state that all three matrices (scatter, covariance, correlation) are the result of A'A (self matrix multiplication with the transpose on the left) with increasing levels of data intrinsic scaling.
Discussions of Linear Algebra seem at times to pursue obscurity and to reinvent terminology as a merit; so it's understood that untangling the endless details is a Herculean task, and (these days) wikipedia may end up being the last arbiter of clear meaning.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.19.41.124 (talk) 18:38, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Technically correct, yet lacking in instructional aid?
Talk:Glass–Steagall legislation

message: This section cannot be edited because it is invisible in edit mode. Please let me know how it may be edited.--Quisqualis (talk) 02:04, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I've now removed the "tricksy" template (and done some editing of my own). Should be able to be edited normally now. Snori (talk) 07:20, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Post-financial crisis reform debate - section 

message: I deleted two sentences from the "Post-financial crisis reform debate" section.  They were unclear and unsourced. . . TheCensorFencer (talk) 08:25, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  I deleted two sentences from the final section 

message: An Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glass–Steagall: legislation, limits and loopholes has found that Glass–Steagall: legislation, limits and loopholes should be merged here, but did not identify any suitable content for merging. Therefore, editors on this page are invited to consult the page history at that redirect to see whether there is any content that should be integrated here. Felix QW (talk) 15:48, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Glass–Steagall: legislation, limits and loopholes]]
Talk:Bob Steele (actor)

message: I've moved this comment from the article to here: (John User:Jwy talk) 21:48, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Hang 'em high

message: The image of Steele in the article is not of Steele. There is not even a slight resemblance.96.235.138.157 (talk) 01:34, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, not Bob Steele the actor. 2600:1700:E190:BE60:F062:F548:3C:C25 (talk) 16:48, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong Picture
Talk:Feast of Love

message: Plot was much too long, detailed and subjective, reading motivations and meanings into the movie where none are explicit. I've condensed the movie into a brief synopsis, I don't believe a scene by scene relating of the entire movie is necessary or appropriate. This seems to be a real problem with movies, over-detailed plots which often add the editors' POV and biases. I think a short synopsis is much less likely to suffer from this problem. 173.65.222.100 (talk) 05:29, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

message: Several of the actors of this film have moved on to other roles, but, when interviewed by Portland media, the subject of this film comes up. Radha Mitchell, while doing press for the short-lived "Red Widow", stated that Feast of Love has a special place in her heart. Stana Katic said that she enjoyed her short time in Portland. Billy Burke went on to star in another Portland-filmed movie, "Untraceable", and said he wouldn't mind living in Portland if he got series work there. 
Several alternative media film reviewers have said that nearly every Portland-filmed movie, including this one, has fallen victim to the "Mediocre Movie Curse" of the city. One reviewer joked that the movie should have been called "Feast of Breasts" because of the amount of female nudity. Mitchell is fully nude twice; Alexa Davalos (Chloe Barlow) is fully nude in one scene and Katic's left breast is visible in one scene. While several Portland-filmed TV series (Leverage; Grimm and Portlandia) have enjoyed success, movies filmed there have not. Among movies cited by those media members that have fallen victim to the curse are: "Brainsmasher: A Love Story"; "The Hunted"; "Management" and "Extraordinary Measures".76.105.145.42 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 02:57, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Portland
Talk:This Is Your Life (British TV series)

message: I note that Peter Davison's autobiography Is There Life Outside The Box?  is cited as one of the sources for the story that his episode was to end with Beryl Reid, but no page number is given. I did not recall reading this in the edition I have and looking through it again I have been unable to find any mention of this or the fact it eventually ended with his aunt. Thus unless this is in a different edition (though mine has the same publication date as the one cited here), I wonder if someone is confusing sources here? Dunarc (talk) 22:43, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peter Davison - Beryl Reid story source 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on This Is Your Life which may affect this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. Happily888 (talk) 02:59, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:List of 24 media

message: This article should be called List of 24 (TV series) media, that way it can encompass all released information about 24 like any other article, see List of Castlevania titles, List of Kingdom Hearts media, etc. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 00:56, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename article

message: It is a list of ALL media of 24, so the TV series should have its own linked section describing it, as this is no longer called list of OTHER 24 media. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 06:46, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: List the television show
Talk:Barawa

message: I see no problem with the proposed split. Those ought to exist as separate articles. Based on current content, the language article would be extremely short, but that isn't a real reason for it not to exist. Gailtb 07:47, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ditto, split would be fine with me. Eric Wester 21:13, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Done. See :Bravanese people, :Bravanese language. -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 02:21, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed split 

message: I just reverted the article to the version from 20 November 2017‎. Vandalism all over. I'm not sure what template I should add to this but the article should be checked. Alexis Jazz (talk) 09:30, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverted
Talk:Accretion (geology)

message: Why does suture zone redirect here? They form when plates collide. I suppose that that is a form of accretion, but the discussion of suture zones is more appropriate to tectonics. --Bejnar (talk) 14:41, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Suture zone

message: I will be updating this page as part of a geology class assignment in the next month. In particular I will be focusing on expanding the bibliography. BZenith (talk) 15:50, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: General Update Including Bibliography
Template talk:HUCountiesto1918

message: No problem with the date, I just thought that 1918 should be in it too, like in its name.Baxter9 08:00, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date 

message: User:Hobartimus and User:Toroko should cool down and start discussing the issues.
They do not acknowledge:
#Pacta conventa (Croatia)
#Croatian–Hungarian Agreement
#Triune Kingdom of Croatia, Slavonia, and Dalmatia
They insist that in a kingdom there cannot be another kingdom, I am sure that in history there were such examples.
Imbris (talk) 18:20, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Kingdom of Croatia-Slavonia]] 

message: What is the plural of comitatus? Surely it's not comitatus again, as used in this template. Wictionary gives comitati, but that doesn't sound right in English. Anyone know any better? Jan1nad (talk) 14:55, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Comitata.--Theirrulez (talk) 16:50, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plural of Comitatus 

message: Fun. Who wrote it? --Theirrulez (talk) 16:52, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corpus Separatum of Rijeka?
Talk:Wilhelm Albert, Duke of Urach

message: How can he be hereditary King of Lithuania, as his ancestors were never crowned, and the state is over 85 years a republic? --Lokyz 08:12, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Look at the Pretender article. Xanthoxyl 13:43, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I see that (just as in the article "Karl Anselm, Duke of Urach") the bit about this man being "pretender to the throne of the Kingdom of Lithuania (with the irredentistic  pretension to Latvia)" has been readded () with the edit summary "He's the direct descendant and heir of the first, only and last King. Do the Orléans need a source to be the heirs of France?". Now, of course, the answer to that question is "Yes", as original research, while a good thing in articles of scientific journals, is completely unacceptable in Wikipedia's articles. And there is a reason for that: who are we - random (and often anonymous) strangers who edit Wikipedia - to make our opinions on the matter worth noticing? So, if there is no source, the should be no mention of "being the pretender", especially given the policy Wikipedia:Biographies of living people.
And furthermore - should the whole article exist? Practically all information in this article is already given in the article "Duke of Urach", while almost everything else either should be removed anyway, or probably should be given there. Essentially the only sentence sourced to what might be a reliable independent source is "He is described as an engineer who lives at Ossenberg Castle near Düsseldorf."... So, wouldn't it be better to make this article a redirect to that one? --Martynas Patasius (talk) 18:24, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pretense and notability
Talk:The Gizmo

message: The correct name of this gadget is in fact Gizmotron. Godley and Creme let the Musitronics company (best known for their Mu-Tron phaser) manufacture the Gizmotron. ARP bought Musitronics and renamed it to Gizmo Inc.
:If that's true beyond question, then the article should be moved to the name of Gizmotron with a redirect. I've just checked my copy of Consequences, where they refer to the device only as the gizmo. So ... I dunno. There should be some definitive answer available somewhere. Grimhim 09:56, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

message: Article mentions that Gizmos were made with a plastic called "Durlin". Is that actually Delrin?--NapoliRoma (talk) 22:24, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Durlin" ? 

message: The article mentions the device existing as a way to do bowed sounds etc. before other methods. Didn't the Ebow exist around this time also?THX1136 (talk) 19:49, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I assume that refers to the Heet EBow, so that'd be "no, they're not similar." The EBow is monophonic, and drives one string at a time while the Gizmo can use up to all the instrument's strings (so, six on a standard guitar). The EBow has a very slow attack, with the note "started off" by picking or hammer-on or pull-off; the Gizmo has a rapid natural attack. The EBow tone is quite pure, where the Gizmo emulates bowing by applying a physical rasp; therefore, an EBow can be used very extensively over a long period with little degradation, while the Gizmo requires regular maintenance and parts replacement. The EBow is handheld, so can be readily moved down the length of a string to emphasize desired harmonic characteristics, and can also be readily dropped while performing onstage; the Gizmotron is instrument-mounted and incapable of movement. Weeb Dingle (talk) 17:50, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ebow?? 

message: What happened to the prototype? Does Lol Creme still have it? 87.75.117.183 (talk) 03:44, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prototype
Talk:Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper

message: Can you change the third paragraph of the intro so that it is about the goals of the PRPS process and then notes the problem each goal was supposed to solve? This makes it less about problems with aid and more about the PRSPs. Let me know if that doesn’t make sense.
Under participatory process, I think it is really important to talk a bit about how this actually plays out or not. This will make the section more balanced. I realize this can also be in criticism later, but I think it is better to address it right where you talk about the issue to avoid any bias. Similarly, one could talk about problems of data and information in the poverty analysis part.
For the other sections, I think you are on the right track. For a few more sources, try this strategy. Using scholar.google.com, search PRSP. You will get the Dijkstra article you are already using, then under the entry for it, click ‘Related articles’. You will get a ton of articles, then you can go to the Mills library site and see if we have access to any of them. They should help you fill in more about the formulation process and hopefully the others as well.
Prof M Johnson (talk) 00:38, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Professor. Thanks for your input. Please look below in the "Improving this Article" section where I have outlined what new improvements I've made.Cbielass (talk) 04:32, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Feedback from Govt Class

message: This article is really good. In fact, now I'm curious about specific examples. I'd suggest discussing exactly what the analysis was looking for, especially when you're discussing the core principles the government was analyzing the data with. I am particularly interested in this principle  "partnership-oriented, involving coordinated participation of development partners (government, domestic stakeholders, and external donors)
Otherwise this is very informative. If there is any specific examples with developing countries that show when this strategy failed and when it succeeded that'd be a good addition, especially if it has the specific factors that contributed to the failure or success. It would be interesting to name the particular policies that were critiqued here,  "Critics argue that the criteria used to judge PRSPs by the World Bank and IMF are actually used to impose neo-liberal policies along the lines of the Washington Consensus, and that these policies tend to increase poverty rather than decreasing it."
Otherwise, good job! Super interesting.
Duthomas (talk) 05:32, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia is not a forum. i get scolded.Other dictionaries are better (talk) 15:49, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Peer Feedback

message: Article
Typhoon2885 (talk) 09:09, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Very poorly worded
Talk:2007 Algerian parliamentary election

message: The Constitutional Council published the final results of the election on 21 May (see under "Dossiers thématiques" in the side panel). They differ from the provisional results currently given here in a number of respects, so this article ought to be updated. --Blisco 08:52, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Updated results available
Talk:Velika, Croatia

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement.  Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. 💵Money💵emoji💵Talk💸Help out at CCI!  02:55, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:The Decoy (2006 film)

message: What do you think about the sourcing I've added? I could go either way. I think that there's enough to maybe squeak by but I'm also kind of iffy on that. Do you think this should go through AfD to get a wider consensus? I'm good with whatever your thoughts are on this. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 13:48, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Iffy
Talk:Mynydd y Glyn

message: The people who wrote vitiwales.co.uk seem to have got themselves confused. The mountain seen in the film may well have been Mynydd y Glyn, but that's nowhere near Llanrhaeadr-ym-Mochnant. --Stemonitis 09:31, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Confusion

message: There are 2 mountains named Mynydd y Glyn, one in South Wales and one in North Wales.
https://getoutside.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/local/mynydd-y-glyn-rhondda-cynon-taf
https://getoutside.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/local/mynydd-y-glyn-powys--powys
Zarano (talk) 08:09, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which one?
Talk:Won-gwang

message: Shouldn't the name be Won Kwang or Won Gwang?? Today I just started the article because I couldn't find any information at wikipedia about the writer of the Sae Sok O-Gye, now I come across this one. For as far as I am concered this article could be merged with Won Kwang. Don't you think??  Kbarends 09:40, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Texas Shakespeare Festival

message: Unclear why the notability bit was attached to this: just because it's not Stratford doesn't mean people don't trek to this. Not that I'm associated with the festival, but it has been going on for over two decades. Sounds notable enough to me. 67.10.133.121 09:46, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree and I've removed the tag. I added some sources, including New York Times coverage. Travellingcari (talk) 15:30, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled user comment on notability