Talk:Mario Party 3

message: The introduction to the article was pretty messy, so I cleaned it up some. It needs more work, the gameplay section is still very vague and nobody would be able to get any idea of what gameplay is like from the current description. I'll try to fix it later myself, I just can't think well right now. Some guy 06:08, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: I added two screenshots to this article, so I removed the suggestion for more photos. CJ 18:20, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Photos

message: Why isn't there a part in this arcitle (spelling) about the Action times in each board? They're unique to this game, so I think they should be in it. What do you guys think? 66.168.207.105 18:09, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Action Time 

message: This section is really crufty, and I think it should be removed. Any objections? –The Great Llamasign here 23:55, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, I really see no reason to object, so I guess I'll be bold and remove it now. –The Great Llamasign here 00:09, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

text: It doesn't need to be listed. Mario Party is a well written article, and has no mini-games list. It's not notable to list all the games. RobJ1981 20:59, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minigames 

message: In the minigame list, everything is from the point of view of the player, not the neutral point of view. –Llama mansign here 17:22, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As per the Mario Party article, the game list doesn't need to exist. I don't see why people keep re-adding it. RobJ1981 20:58, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality 

message: CROSSPOST
: Please see Talk:Mario Party 8#Request for comment: Lists of mini-games. —Signed, your friendly neighborhood MessedRocker. 11:57, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mario Party articles RFC 

message: :Image:Marioparty3.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:06, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Marioparty3.jpg

message: Conflicting sources.  Some are more reliable than others, but I'd still like a second opinion.
*May 6, 2011:
:http://www.mobygames.com/game/mario-party-3
:http://www.giantbomb.com/mario-party-3/61-12447/releases/
:http://www.gamefaqs.com/n64/374848-mario-party-3/data
*May 7, 2011:
:http://ign64.ign.com/objects/015/015245.html
:http://www.nindb.net/game/mario-party-3.html
:http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0279947/
:http://www.kotakgame.com/review/index.php?c=4&g=592
:http://www.apluscheats.com/cheats/Mario-Party-3_3975_Nintendo-64
:http://www.gamepro.com/games/hub/n64/all/months/all/popular/1/ (sidebar on the right)
:http://www.videogamevalue.com/nintendo64/marioparty3_045496870898.html
:http://www.metacritic.org/games/platforms/n64/marioparty3
It would seem that 7-May-2001 is the correct date, both from sheer numbers and from reliability (GamePro, Metacritic, IGN being generally reliable, and MobyGames, GiantBomb being of doubtful reliability, while GameFAQs is generally not even considered).  Unless there is a different idea, I'll change it back to 7-May and use the Metacritic source. Salvidrim (talk) 02:02, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Nintendo's official website also lists May 7. AJFU (talk) 22:18, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  NA Release date 

message: With the Story Mode's theme of trying to figure out who should own the Millennium Star, a summary would go nicely here. 2603:6010:8B45:FA00:2077:C477:CB7F:492D (talk) 02:12, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The story is already covered in the gameplay section. We don't need a dedicated summary section. ThomasO1989 (talk) 17:40, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot