Talk:Ramadi

message: I do not understand why this article is ranked so low in terms of importance.  Ramadi is the heart of the Iraqi Awakening and has become peaceful after years of fighting.  This is both an example of what can go right in the fight for Iraq and the heart of a movement that could effect the whole nation.  I would say that it should rank higher.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brenlive (talk • contribs) 15:42, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importance of the Subject.. 

message: as it stands on the article:
By summer 2007, Ramadi had gone weeks without significant conflict or attacks, and has become a functioning capital of Al Anbar again. It is considered the most prominent success story of the counterterrorist campaign to date. 
Counter insurgency yes, but terrorism, nah no need to use loaded terms like that to describe Iraqis battle againts the occupiers and their puppet government, please clean this article of the biassed filt.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.154.195.225 (talk) 16:09, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, you say biased, and then you describe the iraqi government as puppet?  Iraqiedit (talk) 05:46, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality and terms 

message: Much of this article discusses the U.S. presence in Ramadi during Operation Iraqi Freedom. As important of a subject as this is, is is excessively dominant in this article, and should be redirected onto a different page discussing that aspect of Ramadi's history. From the unsigned, but Army-centric reporting, I would venture to guess that soldiers stationed in Ramadi filled in those sections. Ramadi's history delves far beyond 2003, and this article should reflect as such. --Stiche (talk) 22:34, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Off-topic discussion 

message: The al-Anbar Awakening Section has been removed, as it is grossly inaccurate and U.S.-centric biased. It fails to mention the arabic name, Sahawa al Anbar, fails to mention any of its founders, including Sheikh Abd al Sattar al-Rishawi, and suggests that its success was based off the blessings of a U.S. Army Brigade Commander which, although supportive in SAA's ability to grow, was not requisite. The section was not salvagable, and, in my opinion, not relevant to the actual Ramadi page. --Stiche (talk) 22:36, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anbar Awakening section 

message: Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted.
Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia.
This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link.
If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting.
If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page.
If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta.
When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags.
The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true.
Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
*http://hhcom1.co.cc/english/anbar.html
*:Triggered by \b.co\.cc\b on the local blacklist
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 15:45, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:42, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion