Talk:Nina Sky

message: This article is about the "bio" of Natalie and Nicole Albino the founders of Nina Sky, and should be kept as such.  Nina Sky the band, is a total different subject and if made into an article, the subject should include information about the the other members, appearences, tours, etc.  It's the same as if you were to write the "bio" of Ringo Starr and an article of The Beatles, even though related, they are two different subjects.  I hope that this puts an end to the constent redirects. Tony the Marine 18:20, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I completely agree with you Lbmixpro.  I still think this page should be at Nina Sky.  --Musicpvm 05:04, 28 July 2005 (UTC)

text: Just to make sure I am clear as to what is happening... Do you wish for the histories of the two articles to be swapped, and for Natalie and Nicole Albino to be a redirect to Nina Sky?  violet/riga (t) 22:18, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I've gone and done this, adding a new  template at the top of this talk page.  If you'd like the histories actually merging then let me know, but I don't it is necessary.  violet/riga (t) 09:48, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: My research suggests the twins were born in 1981, not 1986. (See the normally reliable IMDb website here ). Would anyone care to disagree ?
Derek R Bullamore 21:08, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of birth 

message: :Image:Ninaskycover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:07, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Ninaskycover.jpg

message: the album
===Tamara Sky===
Are they related to Tamara Sky, the Playmate from August 2007? Nina Sky was featured in the March 2007 issue of Playboy (Playboy After Hours, Babes of the Month, no nude photos). Is that just a coincidence? They look very similar.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.48.136.25 (talk) 18:16, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: "Nina Sky"

message: Are they related to Tamara Sky, the Playmate from August 2007? Nina Sky was featured in the March 2007 issue of Playboy (Playboy After Hours, Babes of the Month, no nude photos). Is that just a coincidence? They look very similar.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.48.136.25 (talk) 18:16, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Tamara Sky

message: Darius20 16:39, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Darius20

message: The style, grammar, and overall content of this article are all over the place. The identity of its first contributor lacks import, but when so first contributed, it was a mess from start to finish. Other Wikipedians and users of wiki should go over the article with a fine-tooth comb and fix its various grammatical mistakes. THIS Wikipedian and wiki user CANNOT trust himself to do so.
Parker Gabriel 04:46, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Overall style