lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of television theme music

message: barry manilow only wrote the lyrics of american bandstand way after the song was aleady known by everyone. and even then he collaberated with bruce sussman. the score was by charlse abertine.69.122.62.231 (talk) 21:25, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Updated. Why didn't you just make the change yourself? (July 2nd 2008)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.129.134.114 (talk) 01:54, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  american bandstand 

message: I think this article has no point and should be deleted. It contains no special information that can’t be encorporated into the relevant articles for each TV show. Ultimately, this article will grow to become a complete list of every TV show ever made. Who would want to read such a list? What for? If I want to know who composed a particular TV theme, I will go to that TV show’s article.
Maybe it’s just me who feels this way, though?
Grand Dizzy (talk) 22:21, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia is an almanac as well as an encycopaedia - see WP:5 - this list fulfils the former. It is, however, extremely US-centric and possibly should be renamed to reflect this. Saga City (talk) 14:03, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Rather than rename it, I would hope editors from other countries add to it so that it becomes a global list. Netrogeractor (talk) 14:29, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article has no point 

message: I think this article would be more helpful if it made clearer the distinction between who wrote/composed the theme and who performed it. Maybe even a table format, with columns for show, theme title, writer/composer and performer.
Thanks for considering!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.165.48.50 (talk) 16:40, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distinction between who wrote and who performed
Talk:Wasteland (American TV series)

message: Is it just me or do the two "Plot Summary" paragraphs seem to rehash the same info? Surely just one of them is all that's needed, or else extending the second one with more detail; as it is, it offers no real value beyond what's already stated in the first paragraph, and comes across as redundant.121.44.228.3  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.44.228.3 (talk) 15:02, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Oliver Twist (2007 TV series)

message: Another major alteration to the plot towards the end is that Fagin is portrayed as a mattyr at his trial, something which Dikens would probably be keen to avoid, and is basically executed because he is a Jew, but refuses to change faith. In the novel he is not executed for being a Jew (although anti-semitism may have influenced the Magistrates decsion, however this is not explained to be the case in the book) , he is executed, like many common criminals were executed (read Great Expectations) because he was a thief, something which could constitute capital punishment in these times. The idea behind having Fagin executed in the series suggests the the courts still supported medieval idea that Jews would steal children, and therfore could be executed for doing so, there was no such law in England in the 19th centuary (although there was about half a millennium previous) and as explained the reason for Fagin being esecuted was purely because he was a racketeer. I find it slightly worrying that history and especially a great book can be changed so drastically presumably to influence peoples thoughts over modern issues (perhaps the Palestinian Israeli conflict).172.215.83.135 (talk) 16:28, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not to mention Nancy being mixed-race, which is hugely unlikely in the story. BBC PC thuggery strikes again?--MartinUK (talk) 16:53, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: And what earthly difference does it make what colour her skin was. ♦Tangerines♦·Talk 17:16, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot alteration

message: Do someone know who played Bet in the movie? OmJagKundeDrömma (talk) 12:25, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: ?
Talk:Australasian darter

message: It would be great to see information on how they can be visually distinguished from Oriental Darters. 99of9 03:22, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Distinguishing info needed

message: Category: Birds of Pakistan was recently added to this article, surely that would be Oriental Darter? Aviceda  talk 02:07, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bird of Pakistan 

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Darter - anhinga melanogaster.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on April 4, 2011. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2011-04-04. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! howcheng  {chat} 20:25, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Darter - anhinga melanogaster.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon 

message: Are they really found in New Zealand?  I Don't think so.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.199.194.235 (talk) 05:05, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Good catch - removed. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:19, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Zealand 

message: The article says they are not found in Tasmania... but the distribution map shows tasmania fully colored in as part of the distribution (New Zealand, too). ". Aapold (talk) 16:12, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point...let me check...Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 19:34, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tasmania
Talk:Chatham shag

message: I have uploaded a high-quality photo to Wikimedia Commons but I don't know yet how to put them into Wikipedia so I hope someone watching this page could do so - thanks!
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:20181001_ChathamsA9D3_444_DxO.jpg
Psychokiwi (talk) 07:16, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos
Talk:The Holocaust/Sandbox

message: Discussion of the old diff and edits has been scrapped.  Starting from scratch, all major changes related to that diff need to be proposed and agreed upon.  Silence of the disputing editors is not to be taken for agreement or consensus.
===Consensus===
::But actually the only "disputing editor" is SV, and he/she flatly refuses to participate. Crum (supported by SV) was the one who belived in the imprtance of the Normandy stuff for whatever reason, and you can see the dispute on this on the main page, with the importance of supposed of the battle of Normandy vastly voted off as "not directly connected" even without my participation (actually - I say not connected at all, besides both being parts of the WWII). --HanzoHattori 08:28, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What do you propose as a next step? – Dreadstar † 16:43, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What now? I guess declare consensus archived (by walkover, as predicted). --HanzoHattori 13:35, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I asked what you would propose as next step, not to 'declare consensus'.  I oppose reverting back to the diff and so does SlimVirgin.  There is no consensus, do not start an edit war again.  – Dreadstar † 16:37, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Disputed edits

message: ::But actually the only "disputing editor" is SV, and he/she flatly refuses to participate. Crum (supported by SV) was the one who belived in the imprtance of the Normandy stuff for whatever reason, and you can see the dispute on this on the main page, with the importance of supposed of the battle of Normandy vastly voted off as "not directly connected" even without my participation (actually - I say not connected at all, besides both being parts of the WWII). --HanzoHattori 08:28, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What do you propose as a next step? – Dreadstar † 16:43, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What now? I guess declare consensus archived (by walkover, as predicted). --HanzoHattori 13:35, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I asked what you would propose as next step, not to 'declare consensus'.  I oppose reverting back to the diff and so does SlimVirgin.  There is no consensus, do not start an edit war again.  – Dreadstar † 16:37, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Consensus
Talk:Alvark Tokyo

message: Some help from someone who can read Japanese would be appreciated.  There is very little English information on this team to put together.  Lots of stuff in Japanese though. matt91486 01:22, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Plate-billed mountain toucan

message: Hi.  At least one of the pictures uploaded for this article (Toucan11.jpg) is in direct violation of its copyright status.  The original photographer has reserved all rights, as clearly indicated here.  It needs to be deleted from this article — and Wikipedia! MeegsC | Talk 00:29, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, checking the other two images, they'll need to be removed as well, as you don't have permission from the original photographers/authors to reproduce their works (or to make them available without payment worldwide for any purpose, which is what you've done by adding them here).  Sometimes photographers will change the copyright on their pictures to allow us to use them, but you must always ask first.  And always abide by their decisions, of course!  :)  Let me know if you have any questions, or need any help. MeegsC | Talk 00:37, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violation 
Talk:Green toucanet

message: Guidelines recomend going with common names whenever possible. Chrisrus (talk) 02:31, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The article is now about a group of birds, so the name is not capitalized. Snowman (talk) 19:01, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks Mr. Snowman! Chrisrus (talk) 03:42, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to [[Green Toucanete]] 

message: This section is much improved, thanks to all who have helped!  That being said, I'm sure you'd agree it could be further improved.  Remember, the goal is to write with probable readers in mind and to state things in a clear a way as possible.  It is my hope that it might get away from mere "taxonomy" and speak of how the branches twig out, like on the fourth floor of the Natural History in Manhattan.  It's so much clearer that way, and you get away from the boxes and more towards a quickly graspable model.  But again thanks to all who have contributed to the improvement thus far.  Chrisrus (talk) 03:42, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Taxonomy Section
Talk:Xyber 9: New Dawn

message: Somebody really needs to sort out the episode guide and add info for them. Dwanyewest (talk) 00:59, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode Guide 

message: I think that Bokabi is a French company not an American one. 11:20, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Xyber 9 looks more European then American
Talk:Vancouver School of Arts and Academics

message: Please note Wikipedia is supposed to provide factual information for people and NOT a playpen for writing whatever the hell you want. Visible cringe (talk) 16:22, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: This page has been subject to repeated vandalism by students from the school, which has caused the page to lose some genuinely good information, such as the arts/courses offered at the school, the magazines published by students from the school, and other useful information. Vandals such as Visible cringe, DabbyDabberson, HaydenHayHa, Es why ell and others have caused skepticism over all of the information in this article, and in general most of the edits on this article have been reverting vandalism. While I am a new Wikipedia user, I've seen this page evolve (or seemingly devolve) over the past two years, and feel that a genuine effort to search for sources for information such as arts offered, testing scores, published magazines (and now newpaperhttps://issuu.com/vitabrevis.vsaa) is possible, however, I'm concerned that any information added will just end up being buried by vandals from the school, and the page will be reverted to (what I consider to be) a stub again.
Of course, I understand that such information may not be necessary. I just wanted to bring up the concern. Thank you for reading.
I'd also like to thank John from Idegon for keeping an eye on this page. RollerC (talk) 23:09, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism concerns
Talk:The MetroWest Daily News

message: Not sure how to proceed on this one regarding use of the "The". The paper is inconsistent in its self-references; usually (although not always) in running text, it's just MetroWest Daily News; on its front-page nameplate, however, it's The MetroWest Daily News. Thoughts? ``` W i k i W i s t a h W a s s a p ``` 14:32, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Name
Talk:Anthony Anderson (murderer)

message: Has he been released? --Josh Atkins (talk - contribs) 19:39, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current status 

message: This page was the link from Harold Shipman's article about how government ministers can't define prison terms anymore.
That doesn't make a lot of sense, the article is small and mostly a summary of events not a detailed analysis of the law changes resulting from his case. 
80.169.132.92 (talk) 14:19, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parliament can't change prison terms anymore?
Talk:Greenskeeper

message: That section sounds too conversational for an encyclopedic article. It addresses the reader directly a bit too much, and it sounds like a how-to article. SeanMD80talk | contribs 21:38, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inappropriate tone 
Talk:Dara Singh (Bajrang Dal)

message: Illness and death are erroneously reported. They infact pertain to Dara Singh the Actor.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.42.67.76 (talk) 08:32, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Illness and death 

message: Quoting wikipedia policy : "All quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be supported by an inline citation to a reliable, published source. Contentious material about living persons (or, in some cases, recently deceased) that is unsourced or poorly sourced—whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable—should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion."
The citations used in this article to claim that Singh is a Bajrang Dal member is not adequate - especially when official submission in court by legal concel explicitly states that 'there is no evidence' of Singh being a member of RSS or BJP or Bajrang Dal. The makes are citations questionable. All references to Singh's association with organisations should be removed if the evidence does not pass the test as elaborated on 'Biographies of Living persons' The King of kings100 (talk) 14:33, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biographies of Living persons 

message: The lead indicates that Rehman's arms were cut off - but in the fourth para under Criminal activities his hands were severed. Which is it? Prisoner of Zenda (talk) 07:23, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shaikh Rehman 

message: Link no. 6 in References is dead. Prisoner of Zenda (talk) 07:41, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link
Talk:Fernandina's flicker

message: Although the word links to Endemism, and seems to be the appropriate naturalist/biologist term, in the majority of cases in the English language, the word "endemic" is a term used as a medical term to refer to diseases.  Similar to "pandemic."  When I first read the line, I was expecting to read that the woodpecker caused problems through overpopulation.  I plan on replacing the word with "native"  which is better because its simplier, more direct and more appropriate. Cuvtixo (talk) 16:32, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, but "native" does not mean the same thing as "endemic"!  Native means a bird is natural there: i.e. that it hasn't been introduced.  Endemic means that it's found there and only there.  Two very different concepts. The word is wiki-linked, and I'm happy to include the biological definition in the sentence if that makes it clearer for you and others, but replacing it with "native" is not a good solution! MeegsC | Talk 16:40, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Endemic?  perhaps not good word choice? Refers often to Disease
Talk:Canterbury, New Brunswick

message: I have family ties to Canterbury New Brunswick, and would like to correspond with someone who has access to the history of the town and the town's vital records between, say,  1850 and 1900.  Also, I would welcome discussion with someone having knowledge of the legal questions of citizenship for those people who were back and forth over the Amity line.  For instance, what was the citizenship status of people born in the United States, married in New Brunswick, then returned to the United States, having children born both in Canada and the US?  Were marriages of that sort recognized in both countries?  Were the children entitled to either Canadian or US citizenship, or both?  Did the wife automatically assume the citizenship of the husband?Dlstefane 02:06, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Jacob Kogan

message: The link for Pavel Kogan goes to an article about someone from Russia born in 1918 who is deceased.  The one in the article is still alive.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Elleng (talk • contribs) 04:23, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  link for Pavel Kogan is incorrect 
Talk:La Gran Sangre

message: Has cited no sources for over a decade and isn't too big that it would overwhelm the main article. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 19:39, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[List of La Gran Sangre characters]] into [[La Gran Sangre]]
Talk:Helmeted woodpecker

message: Is that the only one available? Sca (talk) 20:38, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Pic

message: The original case study is by Benz and Zimmer. So the sentence about Lammertink is not correct.  --Melly42 (talk) 09:53, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Lammertink vs. Benz
Talk:List of Pokémon (401–420)

message: Most of the pokemon here have their own pages.  Can someone please tell me why that is, if the pages contain nothing but game info and anime appearences if they should have been in Bulbapedia?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.18.4.40 (talk) 02:51, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, merging isn't something that can be done within a week. We are merging all the articles, but we have to do it carefully, so we don't make a mess. WP:DEADLINE, we are merging, we are just taking our time. TheBlazikenMaster 12:34, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

text: Yep, if you like, you can feel free to merge any of these remaining articles into a truncated version in the style of the other sections on these pages. That will justify deleting  the bulky main article (well, turning it into a redirect) TheBilly (talk) 22:00, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem. 

message: This entire article is unreferenced. Is there even the possiblity of finding sources for the facts presented (and disputed) on the page? PouponOnToast (talk) 15:50, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes; the in-game Pokedex is one example.  Another would be the Pokedex book, if one has been released.  Citations from the anime would also be acceptable. MelicansMatkin (talk) 16:12, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: Somebody replaced the list of         that I once knew. First of all, on some of the        's pages it doesn't tell you how to get one. Roserade, for instance. How do you get one?67.38.28.195 (talk) 16:56, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That's game guide information; please see WP:NOT. MelicansMatkin (talk) 17:56, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: No Help at all

message: Um, maybe it's my imagination but this listing is incomplete. In the National Dex, Budew is listed before Roserade, and Budew isn't even in this listing. Just so you know.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.152.136.49 (talk) 10:17, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing?

message: I hate to help wikipedia making the articles worse, but is it allowed to use the Shinx picture? Are there enoough reason to have it there? 85.164.7.0 (talk) 23:08, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No. The lists will not use pictures. Not even one or a few Pokémon, because then people will want all of them to have pictures because its not fair. Only Pokémon that have full articles will have pictures, which are on their actual article. Blake (Talk·Edits) 23:10, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shinx picture
Talk:Sam Beazley

message: Sam Bezley surely, going by his signature?
--06:30, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: All of the obituaries for him that I have seen spell his last name Beazley. I don't know why the signature lacks the a. Eddie Blick (talk) 21:21, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Signature/name confusion
Talk:Superdad

message: I've seen this movie a few times, and there wasn't any surfing scene.  There was a scene in which Charlie tried his hand at water skiing.  He had a rough start but seemed to be getting the hang of it.  Unfortunately, he didn't steer clear of the ramp, and this caused an embarrassing accident.  His daughter's friends recorded the scene on a movie camera, and they had some good laughs watching it later.67.45.112.38 (talk) 20:38, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  What "surfing scene"? 

message: is there any evidence that the extremely limited home video release is in any way related to the unsavory details of Crane's life that became known after his death? PurpleChez (talk) 19:05, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  home video
Talk:G.I. Joe: A Real American Hero (1989 TV series)

message: I do not understand the following sentences:
"The DiC series is a continuation of the Sunbow show. However, the series was successful enough to spawn two seasons and three waves of toys."
First of all why does the fact the DiC series was a continuation of the Sunbow show warrant a "however" in regards to spawning toys? It just makes no sense. Now if it had stated that the DiC series was not popular then I could understand the "however".
Second, the setnence "was successful enough to spawn two seasons and three waves of toys" suggests that the toys were produced in response to the cartoon when it was really the other way around. The G.I. Joe toyline was not a toyline for the cartoon but rather the cartoon was an animated series for the toyline. I'm removing it. 24.178.211.155 02:30, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Spawned Toys

message: This has the same title and takes place after the Sunbow episodes, so why is it considered a separate series and not seasons 3 and 4?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.44.163.40 (talk) 18:56, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: My best guess (Anyone from Wikipedia can feel free to object) is that because with a different production staff and writing staff, that Wikipedia admins decided that this should be a separate article from the Sunbow series article. LReyome254 (talk) 15:24, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Still seems weird that the radio and television periods of Gunsmoke count as one series (same for Guiding Light) but these don't. Similarly, the Basil Rathbone Sherlock Holmes (1939 film series) is actually 2 movies from one studio and 12 from another. Not to mention the mess that is Our Gang. --Khajidha (talk) 17:02, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Separate Series