Template talk:Crewed ISS flights

message: I dont like the use of Manned, seems male chauvinistic to me, should be Human ISS flight.Hektor 03:33, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: No, Manned doesn't imply male. Richard Taylor 00:40, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm thinking of RM'ing the Human Spaceflight articles. It's political correctness gone mad. Manned is the more used term. --GW_Simulations|User Page | Talk | Contribs | E-mail 18:47, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Manned

message: Why are some items (Soyuz and all future flights) in bold? Rillian 16:11, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure about the Soyuz ones, as for FF's, I did all of those, and I probably just copied a Soyuz... --GW_Simulations|User Page | Talk | Contribs | E-mail 18:47, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I originally bolded the Soyuz ones just so you could see at a glance which missions were soyuz and which were space shuttles.. without something they kinda blend together; i'd prefer some visual difference, like bolding, or colour, but i'm not fussy. Mlm42 18:36, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Bolded items

message: I've taken the liberty of reordering the future STS and Soyuz flights so as to conform to the various expedition schedules listed elsewhere here, in particular Expedition 17, Expedition 18, Expedition 19 and Expedition 20. All subject to change, of course, but it would seem as STS flights are adjusted here and there, the presumption should be that these schedules are more or less intact. The dates on some of the individual flights are clearly wrong, or at least not sourced. Canada Jack (talk) 21:06, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've corrected the sequence of flights to match actual launch dates. While older flights are in order of launch, the past several years when an shuttle launch went after a soyuz launch and the shuttle subsequently landed, the shuttle would quite naturally be placed as a "past" launch while the soyuz flight would be "current." And that sequence, I realized, would be kept once the soyuz landed. We should be either listing flights by date of launch or by date of landing, but not both. Seems logical to go by launch sequence as that is the near-universal practice here and elsewhere. So, in the future the long-lasting soyuz missions once they are over should be placed in the proper sequence, i.e. ahead of shuttle launches which followed the soyuz launch. Canada Jack (talk) 22:28, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Sequence of future flights as per Expeditions

message: Nasa plans to fly manned Orion flights to the ISS. And Nasa has published future planned flights. Therefore, despite these flights not yet appearing on Nasa's launch manifest, they should appear here, unless Nasa changes the program or cancels it. Canada Jack (talk) 19:02, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems Senaka wants to make a distinction here about what he defines as "planned". There is a semantic nuance here which he doesn't seem to appreciate, but I nevertheless see his point. So how about this, if we make the distinction here between "scheduled" flights and "proposed" flights, that might be a bit better. Or, if the "proposed" Orion flights as I have it are too "messy," then take them off, but don't forget to clean up the Orion pages if that is to happen. Cheers. Canada Jack (talk) 21:09, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Orion flights