lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Erwin Wurm

message: *Removed "http://www.erwinwurm.net Official Website" from external links. Spamlink. --85.127.118.20 17:02, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: External links

message: I work for an art gallery that represents Erwin Wurm. Added NYT citation.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Armchaired (talk • contribs) 20:29, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disclosure 

message: Seems to be the same boat sculpture as Misconceivable, which moved from France to Belgium at Middelheim Open Air Sculpture Museum in 2010. Wisdood (talk) 12:16, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  hotel Daniel installation
Talk:Esme Langley

message: This article has numerous problems, including the fact that it seems to be written with extreme adoration for this person. As such, it seems very POV and not encyclopedic. I have altered it to remove a few of the more obvious examples, added a cleanup tag and done some minor copy-editing. I highly recommend that someone who cares or knows more about the subject (I got here by clicking "Random article", as I often do) go through and fix up the article.  0x0077BE (talk) 19:21, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Blizzard warning

message: Is EAS ever actually activated for Blizzard Warnings?  I did a Google search, and I could not find any examples of Blizzard Warnings that request EAS activation (normally any warning that requests EAS activation will contain the text "EAS ACTIVATION REQUESTED").  EAS activation is normally only for Tornado, Flash Flood, and occasionally Severe Thunderstorm Warnings (the latter typically only for very severe thunderstorms such as with very strong winds and/or very large hail). Blizzard Warnings are not short fuse warnings, and thus it seems a bit unnecessary to activate EAS for them (this is why they were removed from the Wireless Emergency Alerts sent to cell phones). ANDROS1337TALK 22:17, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  EAS activation? 
Category talk:Schools

message: I'd like to merge this category into :Category:WikiProject Schools so that it can be cataloged by my bot and pages may be brought into our wikiproject. If there are no objection I will merge it in 5 days (September 7) Adam McCormick 02:10, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: After some discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Schools this proposed merge has become more of a page migration and a massive reorganization. I will be proposing a new organizational system at some point this weekend and implement it next week if there are no major objections. Adam McCormick 20:01, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Esti Ginzburg

message: Seems totally unrelated. Is that really necessary in this article? Noaya.v (talk) 22:40, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The last paragraph 

message: This info is pure personal life trivia.  Who her husband used to be married to is in no way necessary to understanding Ginzburg's professional or personal life.  If he used to be married to someone incredibly notable or this connection between the women was something the media emphasized, I might understand, but neither is true in this case.  Without knowing who her husband used to be married to, what's lost in our understand of Ginzburg?  Nothing.   Mbinebri  talk ← 13:54, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Husband's ex 
Talk:Hart–Scott–Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act

message: I put a {Cn} at the end of the first paragraph because I think the statement is wrong. I think the provision originated in the Phil Hart Senate bill. Anyhow it needs a cite.  PraeceptorIP (talk) 02:25, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parens patriae 
Talk:5mm Remington Rimfire Magnum

message: Announcement 17-December-2018: Aguila is doing another production run of 5mm Remington. See the announcement HERE.Trleith (talk) 04:11, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aguila Ammo 

message: Someone could add the Centurion Ammo of Greece is now making and importing 5mm Remington ammo. It is being sold by sportsmansguide.com [HERE] among other places.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by B4Ctom1 (talk • contribs) 01:41, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Centurion Ammo 
Talk:Red Bastien

message: Hey!!! isn't there a trouble with the name of the guy??? in some parts of the article I read BastIEN, as it states in the title, and in other parts I read BastEIN... Kintaro (talk) 19:42, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bastien or bastein? 
Talk:Ettie Mae Greene

message: I thought she was born in Lindside, West Virginia? Ryoung122 16:58, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WHFI Ryoung122 16:59, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Who knows this? Extremely sexy 14:28, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

text: Just tell me, if you own it. Extremely sexy 12:00, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Birthdate verification
Talk:Morality Play (novel)

message: wouldn't this be better as Morality Play (book)?
I know that case is significant, but having two articles whose names differ by the capitalisation of one letter is asking for trouble, IMO. — Timotab Timothy (not Tim dagnabbit!) 02:19, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think it should be a problem. Might be something to check with WP:NAME. Richard001 (talk) 23:27, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Twin Peaks (Salt Lake County, Utah)

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Twin Peaks (Salt Lake County, Utah) (disambiguation) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 25#Twin Peaks (Salt Lake County, Utah) (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Leschnei (talk) 15:10, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Twin Peaks (Salt Lake County, Utah) (disambiguation)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Married to It

message: Is this really a "United States" film released in Canada years before the U.S., as we say in the infobox? That needs some explanation supported by a formal reference.
(Just now I restored the template  from one month ago, as completed by by User:Aspects one year ago.) --P64 (talk) 22:40, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I am not sure about the release date, originally it was listed as 1993 until it was changed to the Canadian release date, , with the edit summary of "changed to original film release date."  Unfortunately it looks like that editor is no longer active, so we can not ask them for further reasoning or a source.  In my Google searching everything I have found says 1993 or March 26, 1993 except for IMDb listing 1991 behind the title, but has the release date of March 26, 1993.  IMDb is not a reliable source and a user may have requested the change.  My suggestion is to change it to March 26, 1993, but only after a reliable source is found to back it up or if a reliable source can be found for the Canadian date, then the U.S. release date should be removed from the infobox. Aspects (talk) 00:09, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  1991 Canada, 1993 US
Talk:Bronx Community Board 10

message: The demographics noted come from the 2000 census, but there are three different ways to compute racial/Hispanic acestry data from the census that year, which will yeild different percentages. You might want to include all of the catagories offically listed on the different census.gov pages related to the neighborhood or 10461, 10465, and 10475 (all of which are fully or almost fully in community board ten. You can get a profile on every zip code, county, city and state. For example: depending on how you calculate the numbers the "white" population of New York City is 35%, 45% or 47% in the 2000 census. The "black" population also varies if you include hispanic blacks. Offically online, reports never include the phrases black-non-hispanic, other-non-hispanic, or of-two-or-more-races-non-hispanic. Only White-non hispanic is an offical catagory. Many Hispanics are counted twice in the system you are using. This is presumingly an attempt to make up for when many Hispanics were loted in with the White population since they checked "other" prior to census 1980. I have looked into this issue quite extensivly while editig the New York City page.
Rock2003 02:35, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Civil Procedure Rules

message: Ideas for further improvement:
* Moving some information into History has left Lead a little thin: bulk back up.
* More on new Case Management powers and methods
* Tracks: SCT, FT, MT
* Addition of "proportionate" to costs on standard basis including impact on conditional fee agreements
* More citations and references
Dave T Hobbit 11:55, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion and editing 

message: Shouldn't the correct title be Civil Procedure Rules? They have been amended several times since 1998 and this article is not particularly about the 1998 version.Cutler (talk) 10:49, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title 

message: I suggest that the membership of the CPR Committee not be listed in the article; it goes out of date periodically, and the current membership is a mouse click away. I have deleted the existing (out-of-date) list; if anyone wants to reinstate and update it they can pick up the table headings and formatting from a version of the article preceding my edit of a few minutes ago. Pol098 (talk) 21:59, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I also think that the references to the “Supreme Court” might have to be updated. Does it really mean the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom, or in the old sense of the Senior Courts of England and Wales? – Kaihsu (talk) 21:19, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Membership of the CPR Committee 

message: Please take a look at 
Costs (let such link load fully before starting to navigate, because that loading will jump you to the subsection at issue).  The subsection at issue has several '[confirm]' tags, and your quick review could be very helpful.  If a given assertion seems correct then you could just delete the '[confirm]' tag, and add no supporting source/footnote.  Bo99 (talk) 14:37, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  review requested; it's easy probably
Talk:List of Jewish Autonomous Oblast leaders

message: In 2007, Yiddish studies professor Boris Kotlerman of Bar-Ilan University facilitated The First Birobidzhan International Summer Program for Yiddish Language and Culture.  Kotlerman's program included a tour of Waldheim (Jewish Autonomous Oblast).  Yiddish is still the region’s second official language after Russian, although it is spoken only by a handful of the 4,000 remaining Jews.  Culturalrevival 03:34, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: edit
Talk:Bronx Community Board 11

message: The demographics noted come from the 2000 census, but there are three different ways to compute racial/Hispanic acestry data from the census that year, which will yeild different percentages. You might want to include all of the catagories offically listed on the different census.gov pages related to the neighborhood or 10461, 10469 (part) and 10462 (part). You can get a profile on every zip code, county, city and state. For example: depending on how you calculate the numbers the "white" population of New York City is 35%, 45% or 47% in the 2000 census. The "black" population also varies if you include hispanic blacks. I suspect you have included invented the phrase "black-non-hispanic", as only white-non hispanic is a catagory. Other-non-hispanic and of two or more races-non-hispanics are not catagories. Many Hispanics are counted twice in the system you are using. This is presumingly an attempt to make up for when many Hispanics were loted in with the White population since they checked "other" prior to census 1980. I have looked into this issue quite extensivly while editig the New York City page. Rock2003 02:42, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Demographics
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history/Hotline

message: This looks like a GREAT idea! I had a bout with wiki-stress due to a wiki-stalker/troll 2 weeks age, and actually quit Wikipedia. I'm back now, but we'll see how it goes, as my stalker is still roaming free. Is this page open to any Wikipedian? I'm not a memeber of MILHIST, but I am in WP:AVIATION and WP:AIR, which has a lot of overlap in articles, esp. military aircraft. Even if you don't want to make this a wiki-wide hotline, would you consider placing a notice at WP:AIR, since the two projects often work together, and editors more so. Thanks. - BillCJ 02:08, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, this is open to everyone (although I would expect it'll be mostly people who visit MILHIST, at least to start with, as that's where it's linked from at the moment); please feel free to leave links to it at other projects if you feel so inclined. :-) Kirill 02:13, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Great idea
Talk:Hryhoriy Chorny

message: *...that in 1628, Hryhoriy Chorny and Hetman Mykhailo Doroshenko took part in a military campaign against the Crimean Tatars?--Riurik(discuss) 02:50, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  DYK hook 

message: Does anyone know how he was executed?  One source I read said only beheaded, another said quartered.  Beheading is evidently only part of being quartered?  I don't know what the article should say. Ostap (talk) 06:26, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  execution
Talk:Data preprocessing

message: Is this just about data pre-processing in a Machine Learning context (apparently the subject of the first reference) or should it also cover data pre-processing in a data mining context (apparently the subject of the second reference)? If it is just about the former, then I have some concerns about notability and self-promotion - given that the article was apparently created by one of the authors of the first reference. --RichardVeryard 03:02, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Machine Learning and Data Mining coincide to a very great degree. So, it is about data set preprocessing in both contexts  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.219.216.110 (talk) 22:54, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

text: A very questionable article. The reference to 'Data Preprocessing for Supervised Leaning'  is even more questionable. The referred article has a spelling mistake in the title, several spelling and grammar mistakes in the abstract and by no means can be considered an overview or a landmark paper in the area. I think that the whole article should be deleted.
128.189.119.222 (talk) 01:26, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've only just spotted the anonymous reply to my original question. Machine learning and data mining are usually regarded as separate disciplines, and I note that an introduction about data mining has been added since I last looked at the article. However, the article still needs a lot of work. RichardVeryard (talk) 15:11, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Context

message: The articles fails to explain one thing: What data preprocessing actually is. The term should be defined in the very first sentence of the article. —Kri (talk) 17:38, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is data preprocessing? 

message: The 'Data mining' and 'Semantic data preprocessing' sections are plagued with poor prose and grammar errors - "The reason why a user transforms existing files into a new one is because of many reasons", "Here is the idea [...]",  "[...] it make sense [...]", "[...] quantifiers like true positives ,true negatives,False positives and false negatives [...]" (badly-placed commas),  "Later it was recognized, that for machine learning [...]"...
SpanishDuke (talk) 23:44, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poor writing  

message: Hi all, I've just made multiple changes to the Data pre-processing (now Data Preprocessing, see Move talk page) in an attempt to improve the article. These have been separated out in order to make it easier to see the reasoning behind each change: happy to discuss if there are any issues but please avoid reverting all changes if possible. These changes include grammar and capitalisation fixes, the removal of duplicate or unnecessary information, and some reformatting. I've also added some tags for issues that should be addressed in the future. EditorOnOccasion (talk) 11:43, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multiple Changes
Talk:M8 (railcar)

message: I'm pretty sure the proposal for bicycle transportation has been killed. Some big wig in Connecticut said that more space for bicycles means less space for customers. I find it rediculous since I've never had a commute from Fairfield without a dozen people standing anyway, but it's the MTA. feh...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.65.85.211 (talk) 00:51, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Bicycle transporation

message: I'd like if someone could contribute an explanation of the A and B car differences other than the tehcnical specs. From my experience in Train Sim 2017 and other editions, one or the other does not contain a cab on both ends. Thanks. 2601:19A:4400:218C:3034:DBAF:EFD2:6388 (talk) 15:39, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  A cars and B cars explanation requested
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/2007-08-24

message: I notice that BetaCommandBot removed a fair use image from this page. Sorry to BetaCommand, but that just doesn't count on this page, as this is a request to create an article in the main article namespace! Use some common sense for goodness sake. - Ta bu shi da yu 03:10, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ive fixed it, by linking it to the image instead of showing the image. Please see WP:NFCC#9 βcommand 03:23, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, you haven't fixed anything. Like I say, use some commonsense! This is a part of Wikipedia for creating articles. The material gets copied straight into the main article namespace. Sheesh. - Ta bu shi da yu 09:20, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

text: I reverted, please see our POLICY and think, these have already been accepted/rejected and there is no need to display the image. Our policy strictly limits the location of non-free images. get over it. βcommand 14:24, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, this is where we must use common sense. The images go straight to the main article namespace. Why don't you "get over it"? - Ta bu shi da yu 15:26, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The image is already in the main article namespace, because the article has already been created. We don't need to leave the image here, as nobody will look here anyway and it clearly violates the "fair use" principle. A link is enough. Melsaran (talk) 15:32, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

text: I've never seen a single submission here that hasn't needed any work. If the person making the page-- or the person requesting it-- cannot take the three seconds to remove the : marks, the article probably shouldn't be created anyway. Might I remind you that a volunteer taking a few seconds of their time is a far better idea than copyright infringement. You'd have a much better case if articles for creation were new articles that were transcluded-- but if the person could create articles to transclude, they might as well make them in the article space (I have an idea to get around this, but it's not important nor for this conversation) -_lucid 15:33, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: All right, I give up. However, what happens if Betacommandbot reverts while the article is being assessed? - Ta bu shi da yu 15:34, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Web pages aren't fluid. It will stay like that at least until the person loads another page --lucid 15:41, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Exactly what does that mean?!? - Ta bu shi da yu 15:44, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Legend-class cutter

message: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=National_Security_Cutter&curid=13049399&diff=519248880&oldid=519207978
That edit doesn't make clear what the editors problem with DHS is. Hcobb (talk) 19:02, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: DHS is not reliable.--Degen Earthfast (talk) 01:40, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: 1) Why is DHS not reliable? 2) The cite that was removed in that diff was not DHS. It some site called " www.fiercehomelandsecurity.com"... whatever that is. -  theWOLFchild 14:15, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the Department of Homeland Security not notable or not reliable? 

message: http://www.staradvertiser.com/newspremium/20130723_Funding_approved_for_2_new_cutters_slated_for_Hawaii.html?id=216549121
According to the article, funding has been approved and the cutters will be stationed in Hawaii.Maltytasker (talk) 19:27, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Funding for 7th & 8th ships has apparently been approved 
Talk:Rugby World Cup hosts

message: Is it misleading to suggest New Zealand, Australia and France have each hosted more matches than the UK? I get it that the Home Nations are treated as separate, but the UK itself has hosted 101 matches (56 in England, 28 in Wales, 15 in Scotland, 2 in Northern Ireland (Belfast)), overwhelmingly more than other countries. Is there a better way to reflect this? 10:13, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: As you state, World Rugby considers England, Scotland, and Wales to be separate nations. Thus, the table is accurate the way it is. CUA 27 (talk) 03:53, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:Miscellany for deletion/User:Arab League/Others

message: i mean that it had nothing to do with Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, but it is an Extension about me...
it has this small sentence because i was willing to expand it the following day, since its 6 AM in cairo... and its past my bed time, anyways, i will be including my my work, such as my Photographs, Vexillological work, and Political maps that i have...
it is my pleasuer because they are all things i like to do... i believe Isarig is exagurating the issue... 
this page can be categorized as an unfinished page, or an under construction page..
i hope you understand...
--Arab League User 03:21, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Rhamnus cathartica

message: The text in section Control repeats an apparent tale about buckthorn seed longevity. Someone thought to check and seeds only last up to 2 years. See Researchers uproot decades of buckthorn management practices (phys.org). I quite this new era where people check whether oft-repeated facts ever were true. Shenme (talk) 15:20, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Control: out of control
Talk:Frangula alnus

message: I see this page has been moved from Rhamnus frangula to Frangula alnus without discussion.
Need to work out what the way forward is in respect of this. 87.81.128.177 (talk) 21:46, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Frangula alnus is the name used at TPL, GRIN, USDA, Stace's New Flora of the British Isles, etc. The article briefly discusses the evidence for the genus move (it could be expanded). So why is there a need for a "way forward" with respect to the article name? Peter coxhead (talk) 06:03, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rhamnus or Frangula
Talk:Sikamikanico

message: The article contains almost nothing but WP:OR, and having WP:MUSIC#Songs in mind, this article should be redirected to Blood Sugar Sex Magik which was the album this song was made for. I will make the redirection in a few days if no objections are made. Tooga - BØRK! 22:14, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirection
Talk:History of Bogotá

message: For clarities sake, I'm going to spell out the "XX"  in XX Century and similiar centuries. Mkow88 (talk) 23:06, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarity 

message: I don't think that this section is necessary, the main article is already linked in the intro. Besides, the redaction is propagandistic and adds no historical information to the page. Not to quote this part (and substantial transformation in the past eight years), looks like political marketing. Slade (TheJoker) 00:57, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[History of Bogotá#Current Bogotá]] 

message: What is missing from the recently created city timeline article? Please add relevant content. Contributions welcome. Thank you. -- M2545 (talk) 16:40, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Timeline of Bogotá]] 