Talk:Glasgow Airport Rail Link

message: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glasgow_Airport_railway_station
Can the two be merged? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.80.14.224 (talk) 04:59, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplicate page / information 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Glasgow Airport Rail Link. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090125180817/http://www.transportscotland.gov.uk:80/news/Construction-Industry-Glasgow-Airport-Rail-Link to http://www.transportscotland.gov.uk/news/Construction-Industry-Glasgow-Airport-Rail-Link
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:38, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Glasgow Airport Rail Link. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.transportscotland.gov.uk/news/Construction-Industry-Glasgow-Airport-Rail-Link
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060615090149/http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/committees/glasgowAirLinkBill/index.htm to http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/committees/glasgowAirLinkBill/index.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120219100858/http://www.cowbrough.co.uk/blog/3-news/66-derailment-of-glasgow-airport-link-wrong to http://www.cowbrough.co.uk/blog/3-news/66-derailment-of-glasgow-airport-link-wrong
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:24, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Glasgow Airport Rail Link. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090611092150/http://www.transportscotland.gov.uk/projects/garl to http://www.transportscotland.gov.uk/projects/garl
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090403112331/http://transportscotland.gov.uk/projects/garl/route to http://www.transportscotland.gov.uk/projects/garl/route
*Added  tag to http://www.transportscotland.gov.uk/projects/garl%7D%7D
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:38, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: There's a report on the Glasgow Council website here from December 2017 that concludes
Without the full and active support of Transport Scotland and Network Rail meaningful progress on the Airport Access Project cannot be made.
It is therefore recommended that Cabinet:
(1) notes the report and that work will continue with the Executive Steering Group to allow a full discussion of the issues raised in the Jacob’s Audit;
(2) notes that until this exercise has been completed any further expenditure will be kept to a minimum; and
(3) asks that a further report is presented to a future Cabinet setting out the outcomes of the exercise and the solutions identified by the Steering Group to mitigate against the issues raised in the Audit.
The audit report is available here.
The current, rather brief, mention of the light rail link option being approved makes it sound as though it is definitely going ahead.  Perhaps we need to find a suitably vague wording for the current situation. Cavrdg (talk) 09:07, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: On the back burner again?