lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Electric guitar design

message: To reiterate my comments at Talk:Electric guitar:
*per WP, An electric guitar is a fretted stringed instrument with a neck and body
**a lap steel has neither functional frets nor a neck
**therefore, a pickup DOES NOT make a lap steel an "electric guitar"
*and an acoustic guitar with a stuck-on contact microphone IS NOT an "electric guitar"
*if there is a "first," it is most likely the Electro-Spanish Ken Roberts
**but seeing as less than 50 total quantity were produced & sold between 1931-1937, a better criterion would likely be "first commercially successful electic guitar
Give it a thought.Weeb Dingle (talk) 04:51, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  claims about "the first"
Talk:Columbia High School (Idaho)

message: Kevin Stanger has resigned to be a professor at ISU, don't know who is replacing him... 70.102.184.134 (talk) 20:22, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sara Lazarus

message: Neat job, but I think Sara Lazarus is a woman. All About Jazz describes her as such anyway.--T. Anthony (talk) 07:45, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: nice work, thanksLazulilasher (talk) 21:53, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: So did translation of this get completed already? - Robert Skyhawk (Talk) 00:02, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like it. Chubbles (talk) 00:03, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Finished?
Talk:Hyundai e-Mighty

message: What I found on a first glimpse:
* "Other areas which imported or manufactured the e-Mighty included Europe," but I couldnt find any proof for that. And the picture is subtitled "Not available in Europe".
* "In many markets the e-Mighty was very expensive and was replaced by the Hyundai Truck when that model became available for worldwide markets in early 2004." Similiar phrases can be read at almost every Japanese truck (this is the first time I read this for the period past 2000). But there is no proof, no explanation why the prices went high etc. 
* "The overseas market was also important for the e-Mighty - to the extent that it was manufactured there from the 2000s using many local components." Where for example? Any proof or source please. "from the 2000s" is another phrase, because it was introduced in 2004 only.
* "Most models of the truck are distinguishable by a front 'e-Mighty' badge, but the common Hyundai badge is usually used on the rear." Once again a popular phrase, perhaps because this is common pratice. Today I saw the same on a Daimler truck. So, why do you state that?
* Is there any reason for manifoldly listing the same truck: Fuso FE = Fuso Canter, Isuzu Elf = Isuzu N-Series etc.
* What exhaust gas standard does the engine comply with? It is a copy of the Mitsubishi 4D3x engine and Mitsubishi appears not to be able to supply it with EURO V or better.
This critism applies also to the predessors of this truck. --Wolle1303 (talk) 02:21, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  needs to be improved
Talk:Albion Motors

message: This article is about the commercial vehicle company, Albion Motors, which was swallowed up by Leyland Motors in 1951. I think we must be careful not confuse it too much with the company called Albion Automotive which now occupies the same site, but which is otherwise unrelated to Albion Motors. -- DeFacto (talk). 21:04, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article subject
Talk:Isuzu Elf

message: Two of the links were just redirects to this article, and the third linked to a page that doesn't exist.  I've removed the section.  --711groove (talk) 12:39, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  See Also section 

message: 1794B / 297 words of prose before recent updates.
8346B / 1395 words Mr.choppers | ✎  11:13, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Size

message: Are facebook link enciclopedic? 93.67.212.200 (talk) 15:15, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: In general, no. Thank you for removing it. --Sable232 (talk) 15:24, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Facebook
Talk:Isuzu Forward

message: Maintenance tags are added because the article or its sections are lacking things which they are. I don't know why you have suddenly problems over that . I'm not being lazy. I'm not wasting my efforts to fix something which cannot be fixed. If you can do the effort then by all means do it. U1 quattro TALK 12:39, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: IMHO there's no need for individual tags when one whole one is sufficient. That being said if others believe each section should have that template then I shan't revert. –Davey2010Talk 12:50, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure. Waiting for others. U1 quattro TALK 12:52, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tags
Talk:Iveco Daily

message: the Third generation of Daily and the second of Renault Master have same door. 
https://ricerca.repubblica.it/repubblica/archivio/repubblica/1994/07/26/accordo-di-collaborazione-tra-iveco-fiat-renault.html?refresh_ce  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.98.110.192 (talk) 11:15, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Third Genereation Daily and Renault Master II 

message: Hi, Should the Iveco Daily Ousheng be under 5th Gen or 6th Gen ?, The Ousheng appears to have a 5th gen shell (line across the driver/passenger doors etc) but clearly has a 6th gen front end so wasn't sure if technically this should be under 5th gen or 6th?, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 22:19, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Iveco Daily Ousheng 

message: look at italian page 94.33.144.238 (talk) 11:45, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  versions are wrong 

message: Dates in references have always been yyyy-mm-dd since the first reference date added by User:Typ932 back in the distant past. See MOS:DATERET. Dmy dates should be retained for general use as per MOS:DATEUNIFY, but for references it should be laid out as per the first major contributor and I have corrected the template accordingly. Thanks,  Mr.choppers | ✎  17:25, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, Thanks for coming here with that example, Thanks –Davey2010Talk 17:38, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Dates
Talk:Articulated hauler

message: It claims that it's off-road capabilities are only surpassed by tracked vehicles, but surely this ignores screw-propelled vehicles, plus vehicles like the Alvis Stalwart, the Goer and the Gama Goat?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:8003:F231:2501:616A:E6C8:B972:2B5 (talk) 13:42, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  The claim in the opening
Talk:Bedford TJ

message: I'd like to add more about Bedford trucks in Pakistan (some of which are still in use) but I have very little information.  The only reference I can find is .  Can anyone add more? Biscuittin (talk) 21:16, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Are the J5/6s in Pakistan all British-built or were some built in India? Biscuittin (talk) 09:35, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bedford trucks in Pakistan 

message: As the Vauxhall Movano was made by Vauxhall who was the parent company of Bedford could the Vauxhall Movano be theoretically classified as an unofficial successor to the Bedford TJ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by James Micredrogs (talk • contribs) 05:22, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vauxhall Movano
Talk:Komatsu 830E

message: The following was commented out in the spec table;
"Don't know why this doesn't match the earlier spec...
Engine power: 	1865kW @ 1900rpm"
: Would appear to be engines rated power, and the lower figure in the table for the Electric drive system, or the manufactures rate power for the truck (i.e down rated to allow for high altitude working conditions) (possibly)
: have tide up the table to incorporate the dimensions, and removed the rest.  - BulldozerD11 (talk) 13:55, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Power rating 

message: 830E DC motor still used in Indonesia especially at Mining Coals at East Kalimantan. 830E, 730E, and all Komatsu electrical unit especially in Indonesian area is possible to repaired and overhauled by Komatsu Remanufacturing Asia (KRA)
:Moved here from bottom of article as irrelevant IMO to article.- BulldozerD11 (talk) 13:55, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Misc comment removed from article page
Talk:Leyland Trucks

message: This whole section reads a a corporate pr. It has no references to back up the claims made. And the addition odf it above the company history is suspect, in the Un encyclopedic nature of this addition. 
The later section with the CV like descriptions of KEY People and again unreferenced. In my opinion is also of little encyclopedic value, and again looks like its copied PR stuff, with no reference. As i'm not sure which policy to apply regarding it (other than unreferenced at this time) I will ask for other editors to review it. 
Also images look like Corporate publicity / concept sketches. Is this article being re written by Paccar ? or connected editors were WP:COI may be an issue. -- BulldozerD11 (talk) 01:58, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have deleted the section on Key People as it reads as though it is a CV for the people involved, by all means mention their names but all of the CV stuff is not for this article which is about the company not the individuals involved in it. If you want to put this type of information create articles for them and link from this article. Obviously those article would have to meet our policies on notability verifiability etc. Keith D (talk) 22:44, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: For the record, The images in question above have now had a official confirmation of Public domain status attached to them on the image page so issue resolved. And references have been added to the text. so most of my concerns are addressed, but the wording of the entries is a bit PR like still, so a copy edit may be in order if I find time. thanks Keith D for looking into the issue - BulldozerD11 (talk) 01:16, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's happening at Leyland Trucks now 

message: Some of the more recent entries, in particular, are verging on promotional language. ("Another industry leading move", for example, reads like an advert.) 86.154.9.50 (talk) 00:27, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timeline needs some attention 
Talk:Luton body

message: Some commercial vehicles have a wind deflector on the cab roof, but this is not a Luton body: the Luton is functional and can be accessed from the main body.
what does this mean?   can be accessed from main body ? what is the 'main body'  Does a luton need the load area bit above the cabin  or it's not a luton?   109.176.122.10 (talk) 11:09, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Exactly. The space above the cab in a Luton body is part of the main load area. The wind deflectors often fitted above the cabs of heavy trucks (in Australia almost universally for long-haul vehicles, to save fuel) are not Luton extensions, because the enclosed space within them is neither used for cargo nor accessible from the main load area. See the example at right. Similarly, if a cab-forward truck has a sleeper cabin it's generally over the cab as there's nowhere else for it to go, but that's not a Luton extension either although it looks superficially like one. Andrewa (talk) 22:00, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Wind deflectors

message: Given that Luton body has much in common with Box Truck, I propose that the two are merged, with Luton Body becoming a section within Box Truck. Cheers, 1292simon (talk) 23:44, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger
Talk:MAN Lion's City

message: Only a derivative of said vehicle, just modified for RHD markets. Nordic Nightfury 13:55, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Support: I have thought about suggesting it myself. It should be put inside the "Chassis variants" section. But to avoid obstructing the article, the operators part should be put in an "Operators" section at the bottom of the article (above "See also"). Only one or two sentences about the first and/or last vehicles (per type, NOT per country) should be with the technical part. For the A34 and A48 versions there is so little text that there isn't any problem, but the amount of text about operators under the A95 version would totally break the readability of the article. I would also suggest to merge the NL xx3 F (A22) article into the Lion's City article, but I guess since it's a lot more widespread and numerous than any other chassis variant it might deserve its own article anyway. (Serial numbers suggest that there have been built more than 5500 chassis of the A22 type, yet that's not much compared to the standard 12-metre integral bus with horisontal engine (A21) which is close to 14 000 now.) Also, the NG xx3 F (A24) article that I made got deleted (for lack of notability), but I have saved it and can add it too if this merger goes through. I will also try to add a model designation overview to the Lion's City article some day. I didn't when I updated the article recently as I have no references for it, but they are very self-explanatory and the system has been the same for several decades, so I guess it don't need a very exact reference. Bergenga (talk) 23:06, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  However, note that I haven't carried out the suggested pruning of the article, but have no objections to others doing so. Klbrain (talk) 14:23, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[MAN NDxx3F]] 

message: Hi, I have completed a mass overhaul by removing the gallery and adding the image to the article, due to WP:NOTGALLERY prohibiting separate galleries. Hope that's ok with you, and please feel free to discuss on this page or send me a talkpage. I'm fine either way. --EurovisionNim (talk to me)(see my edits) 03:46, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Overhaul
Talk:Tatra 80

message: The T80 liquid-cooled V12, like the quite different T77's air/oil-cooled V8, doesn't easily fall into any of the usual valve descriptions. The T80 is described by everyone (Tatra copycat reportage is routinely unreliable), including factory historian Karel Rosenkranz, as side-valve (which Americans would call L-head), but it isn't. Side-valve engines have their valve-stems parallel to the cylinders, with an inverted L-shaped combustion chamber but, like the T77's though arranged differently, the T80's is another high-cam OHV engine with no pushrods. The valve-stems are horizontal, not parallel to the cylinders, and the combustion chamber is a sort of asymmetrical hemi, not an L-head.  The engine is not SV and plainly not sleeve-valve, and there isn't an established shorthand for it, but it shouldn't be misrepresented by using one of the familiar categories. The 1932 Auburn 12-160's 45deg Lycoming V12 had similar horizontal valve stems and wedge-shaped combustion chambers, but with a lower camshaft and vertical 'walking beam' rockers, albeit shorter than the Tatra T77's horizontal ones. Heckmotor97 (talk) 15:00, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mis-described engine 

message: The 'History' text concludes with:  "Tatra built 22 Type 80 cars between 1931 and 1935", while the 'Overview' side panel has 25 produced.  Factory archivist Karel Rosenkranz, in his enormous 'Tatra 100 Years - Passenger Cars' has 26 produced from 1932-38. Heckmotor97 (talk) 13:06, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number built, and dates?
Talk:Mack R series

message: Warth(98) shows an R in Oct 61 (p187) and in Oct 63 (pp191-192). Last B built on 28Apr66 (p204), this must be what macktrucks.com means by “replaced in 1966”?
First ref “Corporate History: 1960-1969” changed back one page to just History, that way it can be used for different decades.Sammy D III (talk) 19:53, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  28Jun13 reword 

message: First, I’m pretty sure this is some kind of an “R”. Bad angle, but unless you can come up with a better one, I’m saying R.
First, and most obvious, difference is the mirror brackets. The right side would be longer with a brace going down. The left side is way too long, DM has only a simple loop with mirror inside. The mirror is right there, years of experience. Instead of the loop angling slightly to the rear, we pushed them so that they angled slightly forward, to keep the mirror out of the way. You can see the simple loop on the subway and plow picture.
The cab appears very narrow, they were, look at the subway pic. I seem to recall winding the right window down without leaving the seat.
The hood is pretty long for a DM. If it has a Mack engine, it’s a low-powered one, a 237, maybe 250. Aftercooled engines (I can explain) like a 300 have two tubes coming out of the air cleaner, one for intake, one for the intercooler. Might be a vendor engine, tho, silver dog. I guess that could go either way.
This looks like a tractor w/crane. Short wheelbase, only two outriggers, and truck this size would have a larger crane. Too much truck for the size of the boom. To me, this is clearly an “800”, but I don’t have a steel hood “600” to compare with. Still, I’m sure it’s an 800.
This could be an Illinois truck. No front plate (which we need here), but that tax stamp showing under the air cleaner looks good. We had portrait, with the shape of the state, different colors for different years. The background looks good, too, check the fences, houses, and snow. Not it “is”, but it “could be”.
It's my 42nd anniversary. Yea, personal, but I'm proud. Sammy D III (talk) 17:43, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  25 Mar 14 (about 24 Mar image)
Talk:Tatra 815

message: I improved the wording of the "central load carrying tube" and "axle" sections to make them more understandable. Feel free to undo and/or contact me about these changes at autonomousvehicles@gmail.com. If you like the result, I'd be glad to help out with this article as time allows.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Takeitupalevel (talk • contribs) 03:35, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Mack Titan

message: *MP10 Engine
The Mack MP10 engine is indeed Volvo D16C based with EGR technology and produced by Volvo Powertrain Corp at Hagerstown in Maryland for North American market.In fact all the engines are from Volvo,  MP8 -> D13 , MP7 -> D11, and of course both Mack and Volvo are pretty quiet about it too as it may upset some die hards. The pictures don't lie, put the engines side by side and you'll notice the resemblance in the core engine components just painting it different color and adding different rocker covers and sumps is not enough, however engine software may be different depending on application.  Stonufka (talk) 14:06, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Marmon-Herrington

message: The article needs to make clear that the company still exists and what it currently does in the lead, but also cover what the company used to do in a "History" section.  Currently, the lead starts off with "Marmon-Herrington was a builder of trucks, buses, and trolleybuses..." and I'm afraid this will confuse the reader. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 04:21, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've dealt with this now. SJ Morg (talk) 13:30, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Incoherent

message: * when did tha production start / end ? 
* how many of them were built ? 
* strengths / weaknesses ? 
--Neun-x (talk) 18:49, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  wanted: details about "MK II" 

message: I doubt that these trolleybuses are TC49 but rather TC48 because they have 7 windows between the two doors where the TC49 have only 6.
Ldgdps (talk) 03:28, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Belo Horizonte and Recife trolleybuses
Talk:Mercedes-Benz short-bonnet trucks

message: It seems this page was moved from Mercedes-Benz L-series truck with a redirect left behind at that page. Looking at the history of that page, it is clear that in this case the redirect is wrong.
curprev 06:35, 9 May 2016‎ Johannes Maximilian talk contribs‎ 63 bytes +63‎ Jojhnjoy moved page Mercedes-Benz L-series truck to Mercedes-Benz short bonnet trucks: "L" is used for all trucks by Daimler-Benz which were produced until the early 1970s, not for short bonnet trucks only.
It is very confusing to look for general and common information on L series trucks like the postwar L701, L3250, L3500/L4500 and L311/L312, and wind up on this page about short bonnet trucks.
--5.186.55.135 (talk) 04:40, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong redirect 

message: I have a 2624 benz myself and I need spare parts such as crankshaft, rings ,main and corn brings. 147.92.48.141 (talk) 18:36, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spare parts
Talk:Toyota G1

message: I have added various redirects (eg, Toyota LB and Toyota DA bus) that point to here. As per WP:REDIRECT, other articles can link to those redirects instead of linking directly to here. If any of the vehicles are moved out of this article then the redirect is updated (or becomes the main article) and the links from other articles keep working. As we add new vehicles to this article, we can also create new redirects.  Stepho  talk  23:23, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirects
Talk:TravelCenters of America

message: *The article mentions Quaker Steak & Lube (now apparently 42 standalone restaurants) more than once but an agreement to sell was finalized so TA no longers owns the company.
*According to the article a suit against Comdata is awaiting a "court's final ruling" (from 2018) but it seems TA won
*Needs reviewing: It seems to be a marketing ploy to tout the nation's largest "publicly-traded" full-service travel center network. Most readers will not know the difference between privately held and publically traded only that it is considered "the largest". It would seem some content on that in the body would add clarification. The 750 location Pilot Flying J is actually the "largest" truck stop chain.--  Otr500 (talk) 18:23, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update required
Talk:Trolleytruck

message: The german article on this topic is well illustrated and at de:Güter-Obus. 67.86.73.252 (talk) 03:40, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  German article 
Talk:Volvo F10, F12, and F16

message: Didn't the F10 and F12 replace the F88 and F89 respectively, as the two prior Volvo COEs that date from the 1960s used the same respective Volvo TD100 and TD120 diesel engines?
WikiPro1981X (talk) 02:11, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The F10 and F12
Talk:Cabin (truck)

message: In deciding whether to call this article Cab (truck) or Cabin (truck), a Google search showed 46,000,000 hits for Truck Cabin and 44,100,000 hits for Truck Cab.  This is considering some people also call the tractor unit of a semi-trailer truck a cab.  Also, it would be somewhat disruptive to redo all the links to Cabin (truck).  I guess Cabin wins.  H Padleckas (talk) 15:00, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Volvo Trucks

message: I've removed this list of countries as every company article and many others could be padded out with similar lists of general links. 
The statement that they export to 130 countries is a valid point but to list them all is abit OTT.
*Africa
**Angola
**Algeria
**Egypt
**Morocco
**Namibia  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.190.104.223 (talk) 08:08, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  list of countries 

message: The Production facilities section seems to violate WP:SOAP in the introduction. I suggest removing the offending sentences. Cristiklein (talk) 15:11, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  SOAP violation 

message: Only positive information written, parts written from a first-person point of view, see "the lowest solvent emissions in our industry." Nytewing07 (talk) 14:22, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: added POV template

message: What's going on with the Volvo VNX link in the Current product line-up section?  NearCry (talk) 15:38, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Volvo VNX 