Talk:And to Think That I Saw It on Mulberry Street

message: The part about the real "Mulberry Street" is incorrect: According to Your Favorite Seuss, Mulberry Street was named after the one in Springfield, Massachusetts, where Geisel grew up, rather than the one in Little Italy. It doesn't intersect with any Bliss Street, however.
:Can you add that info, along with the citation information, to the article page? Pnkrockr 19:34, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems likely that the street is named after the one Suess grew up near, but as you said, he may have also chosen that street name as it's a common one.  Thanks for adding a citation that mentions the belief that Suess's Mulberry Street is this Mulberry Street.  Don't forget to sign your comments with 4 ~~~~'s.  Pnkrockr 01:44, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Mulberry Street

message: The final sentence of the article doesn't make sense, or at the very least is redundant.  If you read 'this street' as meaning Mulberry Street, in MA, then the sentence is redundant, since we already established that earlier in the article.  I think what this sentence is trying to say is that Fairfield street is believed to be the street Seuss envisioned, despite him using a different street in the title.  dimo414 (talk) 02:31, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Some have speculated that this street is the source of the title

message: :Image:MullberryStreetbookcover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 18:48, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:MullberryStreetbookcover.jpg

message: From Dr. Seuss and Philosophy: Oh, the Thinks You Can Think!:  There some stuff on Mulberry in there—including some brief stuff on the artwork, and this:
::"When he began writing children’s books, he responded to editors who rejected And to Think That I Saw It on Mulberry Street for lack of a clear moral message by saying to his wife: 'What's wrong with kids having fun reading without being preached at?'"
An there's this from Dr. Seuss (Theodor Geisel) by Tanya Anderson:
::"When And to Think That I Saw It on Mulberry Street! was published in 1937, the people of Springfield, Massachusetts, were a little concerned. Unsure of what the book was really about, some townspeople were afraid that the book was going to tell personal, even embarrassing, stories about some of them who actually lived on Mulberry Street. Imagine their relief when they finally saw Dr. Seuss’s children’s book. Instead of a serious, scandalous book, Mulberry Street delighted them with tons of funny-looking creatures and a little boy who had a great imagination—a boy not unlike the young Ted Geisel they had known." 
There's also more in there about the Publishers Weekly ad, the reception, and the "expensive" $1 cover price, due to the colour printing. Curly Turkey (gobble) 01:37, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: All sounds good - as more (referenced) content is always helpful. Please feel free to add away! Ckruschke (talk) 16:38, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  More sources 

message: This is a reminder to myself more than anyone. Just a few odds and ends that need to be straightened out with this article.
* Geisel apparently made an ABC book some years before he started work on this book. But everybody passed on it because it was too expensive. I doubt if remains of it exist. Important primarily because of this book's status as the first Dr. Seuss book. He also illustrated Boners, a book of boyish malapropisms -- though I'm not sure if that was aimed specifically at children. 
**on pages 27–28:"He checked his contract and found that it didn't prevent him from writing children's books.  In 1932, he wrote and illustrated an ABC book.  It contained his usual array of way-out animals including a long-necked whizzleworp.  No publisher would buy it." Curly Turkey (gobble) 04:54, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Also need to add info in the Analysis section about the relationship between Marco and his dad. Bobnorwal (talk) 21:51, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: There's some stuff on this pages 47–48.  If you can't get access to the book, I'll see what I can put together after the GAN closes.  There are some other interesting tidbits here and there in other essays of the book as well. Curly Turkey (gobble) 06:08, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

text: My nerd pride takes great offence as being called—ergh—"cool" ... but I'll let it slide.  I have full access to the books I've mentioned here, so I'll add anything from them that you can't, but I'd rather get the GA closed first.  Technically, I think it's supposed to be closed after seven days.  If you can get those page numbers done, then I'll start working at incorporating what I can into the article. Curly Turkey (gobble) 22:01, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  A few niggling points 

message: For an American book, shouldn't the date style in the citations be American style? I don't feel like fixing them, but perhaps a gadget-wielding person can do this quite quickly and easily (especially if a hidden note/tag for American-style dates is added). Softlavender (talk) 10:03, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  British date style in citations 

message: Needs to be reverted to https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=And_to_Think_That_I_Saw_It_on_Mulberry_Street&oldid=845562213  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adamw (talk • contribs) 13:26, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  vandalism 

message: Mulberry Street was published in 1937. 
According to the Center for the Study of Public Domain at Duke University Law School, 
https://web.law.duke.edu/cspd/publicdomainday/2021/
"On January 1, 2021, copyrighted works from 1925 will enter the US public domain, where they will be free for all to use and build upon." 
So is it still under copyright? --Nbauman (talk) 00:37, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: By your explanation, the answer is yes it still is. By my math, Mulberry Street won't enter into the public domain until 2033. Ckruschke (talk) 19:13, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright status? 

message: I don’t know enough about the topic but someone who does might want to update the article to say the book has been withdrawn from publication as of March 2021, see CNN - Dr. Seuss books cease publication  —Boreas74 You'll catch more flies with honey 09:45, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Longer Published