Talk:RFactor

message: The article was suffering from being out of date as well as having many references to dates, which were often referred to future events. Like awaiting features or upcoming patches. I rewrote it to be more timeless and a bit more generic thereby. It's still far from perfect, but maybe a better point from where the quality can be enhanced.
Some paragraphs still need some updates. For example, the community-section could be longer, since the community is what made the concept of rFactor a success in the first place. Also the section about the initial reaction should be about the history, since the game is on it's last year and the successor rFactor2 is announced.
I appreciate feedback.
Dahie (talk) 06:50, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Timeless

message: I've uploaded 4 logos from the EPS file distributed on the rFactor Website (http://www.rfactor.net/downloads/rf_logoset.zip , http://www.rfactor.net/index.php?page=downloads ).
Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg|"Long", color
Image:RFactor_Logo_Black_Long.png|Long, black & white
Image:RFactor_Logo_Colour_Wide.png|"Wide", color
Image:RFactor_Logo_Black_Wide.png|Wide, black & white
JamesHoadley 09:46, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Logos

message: I suggest to clean up the link list of this article. 
As rFactor is support by many dozent modding teams, links to their webpages should be removed and only links to common ressources like rFactorCentral or should be included. Better link to pages, where you can get them all then advertising for just few mod-teams.
--Dahie 17:00, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, it should be ~6 items long. The mod and circuit lists should probably be culled altogether, there's a whole plethora now. Maybe the different sources should be described (i.e., GP4, F1C, original creation etc). --JamesHoadley 12:37, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Linklist 

message: This article is really old. It talks about stuff coming in the future but those things are already present in rFactor. Also it's written like a website or an article, not like an encyclopedia's page.  (unsigned by User:84.50.172.75)
: Yeah, it needs updating. The list of tracks and mods (now extremely non-comprehensive and out of date) needs to go, along with all the league spam. The last two edits were people moving their leagues higher. If that was done it would be much more encyclopedic, and I think there's only minor technical updates to rFactor, so it would be pretty much right, Good Article standard. Any thoughts anonymous one? --JamesHoadley 06:55, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I took the first step and removed the outdated and senseless lists. So the first thing is done, I'd be glad if more people get involve and restructure the article. Actually there is a lot redundancy at the moment.Dahie 11:42, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Good move, I did a lot of the initial editing, and updated those lists, but I haven't added much content for ~1.5 yrs. All of the external links other than Official and Reviews need to go to, it's too long and probably against Wikipedia's policies anyway. Any thoughts? --JamesHoadley 14:42, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs Updating 

message: "As noted above, if the former fails (an unlikely scenario), it will be a good but tiny game."
Last sentence of the Initial Reactions paragraph... Sounds like POV to me, feel free to add if I misunderstood.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by GBobly (talk • contribs) 22:32, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV