lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:1918–1919 United Kingdom police strikes

message: There are several reasons why I think this article is a copyright violation. It was written in a single edit. The poster made no changes to the article after posting. Finally, it has no context. It is like the text is part of a bigger document and was copied and pasted here. -- Kjkolb 09:07, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: So what do we do about this?  I didn't delete it as i couldn't find anything concrete to suggest it was a copyvio; at the very least, there is nothing currently on the web that this is copied from.  But your suspicions do seem well-founded . . .  --heah 19:51, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Previously, suspected copyright violations without sources were listed on copyright problems. They remained there for a few months and I think the most blatant ones may have been deleted eventually. Then, a new system was created (with good intentions) (see Wikipedia talk:Copyright problems/Without online source for more information, also, my view is on the bottom). Now we're supposed to put the notice above on the talk page of the article, but there is no information about what happens next. I speculated that the copyright violation templates would stay on the talk page indefinitely, because in most cases there is little chance that someone is going to be able to find a copyright violation  whose source is not online or no longer online. This creates a problem in improving the article. Someone who knows that it is a probable copyright violation is much less likely to work on the article. Someone who doesn't know, since the notice is only one the talk page, may not have done so if he or she had known and probably won't be too happy about it if they find out or the page is deleted. Also, whether they know or not, the editors may be wasting their time if the article is eventually deleted. Finally, I think the new policy makes it appear that Wikipedia is willing to use copyright text, as long as its source cannot be found (only "appear", I know there is no support for using copyvios). I don't know what to do in this case. Thanks, Kjkolb 06:01, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No way is or was this copied from a published source. The original version to what's there now isn't much different except for wikification, and both have severe writing issues. "It was written in a single edit" means absolutely nothing. I've written articles in a single edit, which means writing them on Word and then posting them on Wikipedia. There's a reason the onus is on the accuser to prove there's a copyvio, which is because making such a accusation without evidence is the ultimate assumption of bad faith. bobanny 06:32, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Dae Inseon

message: The information about Later Balhae and Dongnan looks good, but needs a) sources, and b) probably to be moved either to Balhae or to a new article.  -- Visviva 00:58, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article contains a lot of original research not supported by links to scientific sources.
There was also an attempt by someone to falsify the sources. Using the language barrier. However, I am a native speaker of Russian and the link to the study of the Liao Empire, has been removed.Ulianurlanova (talk) 16:00, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original research
Talk:Phelps Dodge

message: Should there be more to this entry?  I'm particularly pointing to the history of Phelps Dodge, including the strikes of the early 1980s.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.18.185.44 (talk) 08:58, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed. Not even a link to Arizona Copper Mine Strike of 1983? Also see ,, etc. Oh, well. I'll put this article on my todo and watchlists.... Andyvphil (talk) 14:17, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  History of Phelps Dodge 

message: Why does the name of this company sound like a car dealership? Was there any connection between Phelps and Dodge? --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 15:28, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  0% financing at Phelps Dodge 

message: As a person whose grandparents and great-grandparents worked for PD in company towns, I thought I'd see more of a history, especially a listing of company towns. I'm familiar with Bisbee/Warren and Jerome/Clarkdale but I know that they operated in more towns and more states throughout the 19th and 20th century. 
I only have anecdotal information so if anyone knows more about mining towns in Arizona, I think that this entry could be easily expanded. 69.125.134.86 (talk) 13:08, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Listing of company towns? 
Talk:Plaza de Armas

message: I've added citations where I could.  Also, I changed "one block" to "one or more blocks", as my understanding is that Mexico City's Plaza de Armas is more than a single block.  
The entry seems rather barren as it is and, citations being my strong point, I'm not sure how to add a photo. Blind Donkey (talk) 21:33, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: This appears to be a WP:DABCONCEPT. If this is a true disambiguataion page, then per MOS:DAB, it will be reduced to the following:
Plaza de Armas (Literally "Weapons' Square" but better translated to Parade Square or Parade ground) may refer to:
*Plaza de Armas (Puerto Vallarta), Mexico
*Plaza de Armas (Santiago), Chile
*Plaza de Armas, San Juan, Puerto Rico
*Plaza de Armas (Manila), Philippines
--See also--
* Place d'Armes, French equivalent
Note that there are no extensive ledes on disambiguation pages, no image galleries, and only one blue link is permitted per line. A disambiguation page is purely a navigational device listing article titles that match a particular name; a page that serves any purpose beyond that is no longer a disambiguation page, per WP:DABCONCEPT. bd2412 T 16:19, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomination for de-disambiguation 

message: propose the article be sectioned by historical viceroyalties, as the origins of the plazas date to Spanish colonial rule Arlo James Barnes 20:30, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  sectioning
Talk:FAST Institute of Computer Science

message: I have reorganized the three articles FAST Institute of Computer Science, Foundation for Advancement of Science and Technology and National University of Computer and Emerging Sciences. The FAST Institute of Computer Science no longer exists, so please don't write about the degrees offered by NUCES in this article. This article should be limited to the FAST Institute of CS that existed before NUCES, now NUCES is a multi-discipline University rather than just CS institute. Waqas.usman 09:45, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Reorganization of articles
Talk:Hae Mo-su of Buyeo

message: The article has conflicting dates, when relating with the wiki page on Jumong. Hae Mosu is said here to have died in 195BC, while his supposed son Go Jumong is said to have died at 39 years of age in 19BC. This leaves a gap between his death and Go Jumong's birth of approximately 174 years. Either the date is wrong or the conjecture that he is the father of Go Jumong is wrong, or both.Ken Whitmore (talk) 12:19, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Dates for Hae Mo-su's life?

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 03:06, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]]
Talk:Rayleigh-Ritz method

message: A search on Google for the terms in quotes gave the following results: "Rayleigh Ritz" (156,000 hits), "Rayleigh quotient" (90,000 hits), "Ritz method" (104,000 hits).  Thus it is clear that the method is widely known by the name "Rayleigh Ritz", or "Rayleigh quotient" in preference to any other name.
Not only does a change in indexing lead to a less accessible article because "Ritz method" is less widely used, it also denies primary credit to the man who originated the method, William Strutt, known as Lord Rayleigh.  Rayleighs contribution to science amounted to some 600 papers over his lifetime of 77 years including several published posthumously.
I have used the method to find the first natural frequency for complex systems.  All that is needed is a reasonable estimate of the mode shape for which the static deflection curve is often used.  This first estimate is usually accurate within less than 10%.  The next step is to calculate the inertia loading by using the acceleration due to the first estimate of the frequency, and substituting this for the static weights, derive the second frequency estimate.  This second estimate is typically accurate within less than 2%.  A third estimate using the frequency from the second would be accurate within less than 1%.  The method converges extremely rapidly with any reasonable starting point.  In all cases the estimate is higher than the actual natural frequency.
CHARLIE ENZ 17:44, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

message: Please, read:
E. Butkov, Mathematical Physics, "Variational Methods", section 13.5 
G. Arfken, Mathematical Methods for Physicists, "Calculus of Variations", section 17.8 
You must understand that Wave Mechanics (Quantum Mechanics), Electromagnetic Waves, and Acustic Waves are the same mathematical formalism, satisfying the Sturm-Liouville problem, and belonging to Hilbert Space solutions. 
Rayleigh-Ritz method is exactly the same as Ritz method.
RafaelBarreto 20:12, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is the same principle as Ritz method
Talk:Cock-of-the-rock

message: Why does the stamp shown on this page show GHANA (which is in Africa) whilst the article states the bird is only found in South America
:It's also specifically proscribed under the fair use tag on the image description page. As nice as it is to have a picture to go with this article, I fear people will need to find a new one. 69.140.12.199 22:35, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Stamp
Template talk:Campaignbox Hungarian–Ottoman War

message: Battle of Rovine is part of the Wallachian-Ottoman wars, not of Hungarian-Ottoman wars. greier 10:36, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

message: The following battles are part of Long campaign: 1)Iron Gate, 2) Zlatitsa, 3) Niš and 4)Varna. That means that Long campaign does not belong to this list. I proposed merging of the Long campaign and Crusade of Varna and expect that it will be merged. Therefore I will delete Long campaign from this list. --Antidiskriminator (talk) 10:55, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Long campaign 

message: All battles after 1526 should be deleted because they are all Ottoman Habsburg wars. 
Kingdom of Hungary was destroyed in 1526 and this template is about Hungarian-Ottaman wars.DragonTiger23 (talk) 20:38, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: You are right about removing them on the basis that the Habsburgs were crowned the "King of Hungary" at the time. In fact Hungary wasn't destroyed but to be appropriate : the remnants of the Kingdom of Hungary existed onwards on the current-day Slovakia territory and was administered as a standalone identity. Lajbi Holla @ me • CP 22:59, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleting everything after 1526
Talk:The Da Vinci Code WebQuests

message: I believe the term WebQuest, as used in this article, is a misnomer.  WebQuest is actually a specific technical term in the field of education, and doesn't mean "A Quest on the Web".  It implies a certain level of pedagogical care which these games to not seem to have.  Additionally, the games themselves do not seem to actually call themselves "WebQuests."  I propose that either the wording be changed to avoid confusion, or a section be added to distinguish between the technical and the colloquial usage.Alex Dodge 02:26, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  WebQuests
Talk:De Kuip

message: Where the hell is a piece about Aston Villa winning the European Cup there against Bayern Munich in 1982?
:not the most important issue to discuss, although a real Aston Villa fan would disagree. Bokkie 21:58, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aston Villa 

message: The names Feijenoord Stadion, Stadion Feijenoord and Stadion Feyenoord are used. At least the last one is wrong officially, since only the football team changed the ij into y. The designer of the letters on the fence made a mistake btw. As far as I know Stadion Feijenoord is the correct name. Bokkie 21:57, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I second this. On both  (website of the club) and  (website of the stadion operators) only the name "Stadion Feijenoord" is used. Also the name of the company which operates the stadion is stated as "Stadion Feijenoord N.V." on their website. -- Kju (talk) 12:18, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct official name 

message: The capacaty of the stadium as of augus 2008 is 51.577. The expanded a little bij re aranging chairs on the second tier. I'll try and find a reference. Knijert (talk) 07:51, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capacity change 
Talk:Base (mathematics)

message: I was surprised to find base (mathematics) as a redirect to radix which concentrates almost entirely on the common use of "base" in expressions such as base 10. On the other hand, articles such as exponentiation, logarithm and natural logarithm use the term "base" frequently to refer to the more primitive notion of the base as the number b in an expression of the form bp. In my view this should be disambiguated, but I'm not sure what is the best approach. For the moment I have replaced the redirect with a skeleton mathematical disambiguation, fixed some links, and updated a couple of related articles. Geometry guy 19:14, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You should start a new page and, if necessary, we can add a dablink at the top of Radix. But leave this page as a redirect. Ewlyahoocom 19:43, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

text: What about the base of a triangle, as in Area = one-half × Altitude × Base? Shouldn't that go in here as well?  DavidCBryant 11:53, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: We could rename the page. There is also Base (group theory) and Base (topology). So, it doesn't really make sense to call this article the "mathematics" article about bases. - grubber 13:08, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Do we really want to redirect?
Talk:Geotextile

message: I'm planning a major re-write of this article, as well as merging it with geosynthetics, contact me if you wish to get involved, hoping to have it on its feet by the end of next week. RegardsGrahams Child 10:46, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The write up is done but is titled Geosynthetics. At present there is a disagreement about how the Geotextiles and the Geosynthetics article should be connected. Hopefully this will be resolved shortly Grahams Child 18:26, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Major Re-Write

message: Relatively new product in civil engineering circles. Besides conventional concrete, steel and timber we now have plastics!
Applications are unlimited: - mining, waste, roads, ...
: According to my geotech professor, linen geotextiles were used by the ancient Egyptians. I suppose that use was limited to arid climes due to rot until synthetic materials came around.--Triskele Jim (talk) 16:48, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Geotextiles:

message: Two photos in this article feature rare and exotic uses of geotextiles in coastal protection applications which misrepresents the most common applications of geotextiles. Further, an older version of this article as well as many non-english articles featured a quality example photo of geotextile samples. This is the more appropriate photo for this article. Pathfounder (talk) 16:19, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  misrepresentative photos
Talk:Notre Dame High School (Harper Woods, Michigan)

message: On p 260 of Binelli's book he stated that Notre Dame moved from Harper Woods to Pontiac but it seems like the Pontiac and Harper Woods schools were two separate institutions and the Harper Woods one merely closed.
WhisperToMe (talk) 15:48, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Binelli's book on p 260 

message: I'm trying to find the old URL of the school.
http://web.archive.org/web/20030526204400/http://www.aodonline.org/AODOnline/Schools+4679/SchoolLocator.asp?SchoolLocatorPageType=Main links to an AOD Profile but the profile page was never archived
The street address was 20254 Kelly Rd, Harper Woods, MI, US   48225-1287 - Will something show up if I put this in Google Books?
WhisperToMe (talk) 16:24, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Website
Talk:Robin Eames

message: Was it wise for the leader of the Anglican Church in Ireland to accept a peerage from the John Major's government? I think not, indeed I feel it was a catostrphic blunder. The Church of Ireland was by law disestablished in 1870 thus ending the travesty of a minority church being a burden to the rest of Christian Ireland. Doctor Eames wrote a book on the subject of disestablishment and yet showed an utter lack of discernment when he became the first Lord to be a bishop in Ireland since 1870. In an over sensitive land surely this was at best an error of judgement and at worst crass and self-serving.
Every square inch of Ireland is represented by a Church of Ireland parish and around a quarter of the diocese of Armagh is in the Irish Republic what exactly was Robin Eames thinking of when he accepted this award? Can it be that under the veneer of ecumanism and cross-community sweetness there lies a dyed-in-the-wool unionist? The law faculty at Queens University Belfast would seem to produce nothing other than legalistic unionists with political ambition high on the agenda, it should be no surprise therefore that the Archbishop should be so insensitive. Eames was well known to be Margaret Thatcher's "favourite anglican bishop" thank God he did not get Cantebury.
Lastly there is the thorny question of those who work for the Kingdom of God being seduced by the baubles of Babylon. Within the Church of Ireland we have often cast a superior smirk in the direction of Ian Paisely and his political ambitions. At least the Big Man is an honest to God street hardened politician no matter what we may think of his politics. Doctor Eames has let himself and his church down badly by accepting reward from the British Establishment and so nailing his archepiscopate to their mast. I hope his successor will have more sense.
: Unsigned comment above was from [82.110.109.208].  That IP address has in the past been blocked for vandalism. Ferg2k 03:50, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Campaign for Better Transport (New Zealand)

message: Half of this articles text appears to be ripped off from the website. This needs to be fixed. Even if permission is goven then it is still a mess. "Got a bright idea on how Auckland can get moving?" is not really the sort of text we need in the article. I'm going to heavily prune it in a minute. - SimonLyall 10:51, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright text
Talk:Goderich–Exeter Railway

message: I'm curious why the info box at the top of the article and another mention in the body of it indicates that the Canadian headquarters for the railway is located in Kitchener Ontario, while the reference at the bottom of the page clearly identifies Stratford Ontario as the location of their offices.  cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 05:40, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Headquarters location? 
Talk:Occupational English Test

message: Hello, my name is Louise and I work for Cambridge English Language Assessment. I'm here to update outdated content and suggest information that will improve the quality of Cambridge English Language Assessment related pages. I will abide by Wikipedia's policies and guidelines and would welcome Wikipedians' views on the updates.
Many thanks, LouisePope (talk) 16:27, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Declaration of affiliation

message: Hi 
I would like to know if OET has a same paper in All the countries or it's different depending on the requirements of the country?
Thank you 222.153.109.162 (talk) 22:33, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Same Paper In All Countries
Talk:Chesham tube station

message: This station is the most westerly on the network. 
Google Earth says it is: http://www.tubechallenge.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=6556#6556
Streetmap says it is: http://www.streetmap.co.uk/newmap.srf?x=496500&y=200500&z=4&sv=496500,200500&st=4&ar=N&mapp=newmap.srf&searchp=newsearch.srf
TfL say Amersham is, and it's common knowledge that Amersham is, but this seems to be an "urban myth"!
There is a possibility that the platform at Amersham extends further West than any of this station, although I find that hard to believe. Crunchysaviour 11:03, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location 

message: The crossrail plans refer to a shuttle service between Chesham and C&L - isn't that a shuttle service most of the time anyway? Can we have better detail here? WillE (talk) 21:44, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: What do you have in mind? It says its a shuttle, its 4 cars and it runs off peak. One thing missing I guess might be that in winter the first cars out in the mornings are bloody freezing and that I understand the service is being replaced by a through service in 2010 after 100 years of service, when new trains are introduced. For a history see Chesham Shuttle: The Story of a Metropolitan Branch Line by Cive Foxell.Tmol42 (talk) 22:46, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think WillE is asking what the difference was between the proposed shuttle service in the Crossrail plans and the shuttle service that exists anyway. I'm certainly confused by the statement. MegaPedant (talk) 23:06, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crossrail Reference 

message: The article claims it is but the article about Amersham station disputes this. MegaPedant (talk) 23:08, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: As the crow flies Chesham Station is 24.9 miles Amersham Station 23.6 miles. Tmol42 (talk) 23:16, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is it the furthest from Charing Cross? 

message: Or why is this called a tube?  For a start, it's out in the country, not underground.  Also, as it's in the Metropolitan Railway, and as such it doesn't run into deep tube railways, but rather like the subsurface covered ditch.  Cf Hammersmith and City line. Talk about confusing (talk) 23:59, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes it's anachronistic, but it's consistent with other stations on the London Underground and has general consensus. See Wikipedia:Naming conventions (UK stations), also these examples: Ladbroke Grove tube station - above ground level; Hammersmith tube station - at ground level; Royal Oak tube station - below ground level but entirely "outside"; Paddington tube station - below ground level and partially covered over; and Great Portland Street tube station - entirely covered over. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 11:27, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's a tube?
Talk:Biathlon at the 1988 Winter Olympics

message: Hello! Can you add the Bib numbers for the individual biathlon races at the 1988 Winter Olympics in Calgary?.
Sincerely yours, Sondre --88.91.100.244 (talk) 18:54, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bib numbers