lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Softly, Softly (TV series)

message: the phrase "series early years" (1st sentence para 2) needs an apostorophe. But it's haard to know where to put it; it will look clumsy anywhere. I think technically it should be "series' early years" but that still looks dumb. "Series" and programme" are both mentioned in P1 could we maybe have "programme's early years" to avoid the clumsiness?
SiTrew xxii-Jan-mmix 22.41 GMT  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.102.156.63 (talk) 22:43, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "series early years" 

message: I believe, but cannot verify, the series began by carrying on a story from the last Z-Cars episode, where having a different organisation of police would have found the kidnapper faster and possibly saved a life.  Perhaps I am remembering the transition from Softly-Softly to Task Force?? Anyone recall this story?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maitchy (talk • contribs) 08:13, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure, but that sound very like the first episode of Softly, Softly: Taskforce where Barlow, newly appointed to head Thamesford CID as had happened at the end of Softly, Softly, fails to find a missing child until after they have been murdered. He and Chief Constable Cullen then decide to set up the eponymous taskforce which is launched in the second episode with Watt being brought in to head it and Hawkins being moved back to CID, Dunarc (talk) 20:45, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Originating Storyline
Talk:Colony Brands

message: I am completely dissatisfied with my purchases from Seventh Avenue. I ordered five pieces of furniture.  ALL of them either had missing or broken pieces. The quality of the materials is very low. I will never order from them again. 72.67.35.112 (talk) 18:17, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This ain't Epinions, sweetheart.  It's Wikipedia.  The talk page is meant to be used for discussion on the article itself, not its contents.76.99.199.53 (talk) 14:48, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

text: I added a section to address the retail store operations (in the Locations section.) PilotEricB (talk) 21:47, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Reidsville Review

message: Confirm this story? See if it's in print Editor & Publisher. Cannot verify by Google search or in Proquest or Ebsco (tho' the citation is in Find@UNC): Two Media General N.C. Dailies Going Twice-Weekly.
"North Carolina Paper Accused of Making Up Quotes" E&P Staff  July 28, 2005 By: Lesley Messer 
Newsroom diversity report for The Reidsville Review/Eden Daily News. From a report for the Knight Foundation
by Bill Dedman and Stephen K. Doig, June 2005.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by CogSciLibrarian (talk • contribs) 14:17, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Items to add

message: I suspect that the print newspaper is no longer publishing. My first stop for a North Carolina newspaper is the N.C. Press Association Directory,  which indicates that the only publication in Reidsville is the website RockinghamNow.com. The research website also indicates that the only news source in Rockingham County is the RockinghamNow.com website  
I then checked the Library of Congress Chronicling America directory of newspapers, which in this case indicates that the paper has ceased publication: 
There is no mention on the RockinghamNow.com of the Reidsville Review itself, though the page mentions that it covers the town of Reidsville. All of that led me to indicate that the paper has ceased publication.
However, the database America's News, which UNC has access to for North Carolina newspaper archives, does list recent articles from the Reidsville Review. One of them, "The Power of Music: Rock-Aid's Facebook Live concert Friday to raise funds for hungry kids" was "published" Spear Susie C. (sspear@rockinghamnow.com). "The Power of Music: Rock-Aid's Facebook Live concert Friday to raise funds for hungry kids." Reidsville Review, The (NC), sec. Lifestyles, 22 Apr. 2020. NewsBank: America's News – Historical and Current, . Accessed 25 May 2020 It is also on the RockinghamNow website on April 22, 2020, by Susie C. Spear sspear@rockinghamnow.com. 
A quick search of the site RockinghamNow does not mention its relationship to the Reidsville Reivew. I then searched site:rockinghamnow.com "reidsville review" to see what was on the website about the newspaper. No results in Google. I did a simiar search on greensboro.com and found this article mentioning the merger: "Introducing RockinghamNow: Your new countywide newspaper //  Eden News, Madison Messenger, Reidsville Review merge into one" By Gerri Hunt gerri.hunt@rockinghamnow.com May 16, 2017 
Further searching finds an article on the N.C. Press Association website on June 7, 2017: RockinghamNow will replace three community newspapers in county north of Greensboro 
So, I will update the page to indicate that the Reidsville Review stopped publishing under that name in May 2017.
CogSciLibrarian (talk) 12:52, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Longer Publishing
Talk:Chūbu-Sangaku National Park

message: ----
Are five stub tags really necessary? ˉˉanetode╦╩ 09:05, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Lands' End

message: I've heard that Lands' End dropped the apostrophe from its literature for a time, but later restored its earlier spelling. Does anybody know the history of any spelling changes in the name?  Reify-tech (talk) 19:12, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Apostrophes

message: In the 1980's when I used to order from Land's End catalog, the styles of their clothing were classic and contained only natural fibers, which I really liked.  When Sears took over, they changed their styles to be
 'fashionable' and the fiber content to be blends of synthetic and naturals, or all synthetic.  With that change they lost me as a customer, I believe that many other customers felt the same as me, we liked the classic styles and natural fibers of the original clothing.  Even the catalog lost it's distinct character when Sears took over.  Prior to Sears, the catalog actually carried stories about where the fibers for making the clothing actually came from, like wool from Scotland and the type of sheep.   To me the original styles and fibers were what made Land's End so distinctive. 71.82.144.244 (talk) 18:25, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clothing construction
Talk:Kohler Co.

message: an article on a lawsuit with the company: http://www.dol.gov/opa/media/press/esa/archive/esa99268.htm Mathmo Talk 10:02, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it wasn't really a lawsuit ("The settlement signed today with the U.S. Labor Department resolves discriminatory hiring practices revealed during a routine compliance review by the department's Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs.") and it was settled nine years ago.  I'm not sure it warrants a mention here.  How much was it covered by the mainstream press?  — Satori Son 19:23, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I was unaware of this happening even though I lived in a nearby community at that time. I doubt it had major press coverage as it didn't even make the local news, and I don't think it should be included in the article. Royalbroil 00:26, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Lawsuit?

message: Need to revise history some 
http://www.fundinguniverse.com/company-histories/kohler-company-history/
Nyth83 (talk) 12:12, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cofounder
Talk:Defend Colorado Now

message: Standing for an election is generally insufficient to a person to merit his or her own article.  In this case, the DCN initiative never made it to the Colorado ballot.  It is perhaps worthy of a paragraph in Colorado HB 1023, if it existed.  As it is, this article is a advertisement for DCN.  The organization continues today. The article conflates the particular issue from 2006 and the present-day organization. The article is a candidate for (a) a rewrite describing the organization (if warranted) or (b) delete, since Colorado HB 1023 doesn't exist. Rhadow (talk) 13:13, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Failed initiative; should it have its own article?
Talk:Acro Sport

message: There are only two sources. There is not that much information about Acro Sport. I think it is not notable enough to be on Wikipedia Florence Hansen (talk) 18:59, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see Wikipedia:WikiProject Aircraft/Notability. - Ahunt (talk) 20:23, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is it really important?
Talk:The Dugites

message: Although there are some links, there's also a lot that isn't supported by references.  Important info about how the band passes WP:MUSIC, such as the gold status of the album, ought to be supported by sources.  NickelShoe (Talk) 15:36, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Unreferenced

message: The current text appears to be a copyvio from .  Stumps 09:22, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio
Talk:King Faraday

message: I seem to recall an interview where one of the creaters of the comic mentioned that they got the name for King Faraday from a song.  There was a popular song they liked on the radio at that time called "King for a Day."  From that, they got King Faraday.  I'll try to find a citation.
:actually, the character many times makes reference to his name, and said it was his dad's joke on him to name him for 'king for a day'.  --Emb021 18:24, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Character name 

message: Why the use of past tense verbiage in his Skills and Abilities section?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.158.101.11 (talk) 00:33, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Is he dead?
Talk:Camp Gray

message: Wow. I was certainly not expecting an entry on this.  As much as I think the article is of decent quality, I question whether the camp is more important than any other summer camp or private campground, such as the Dell-Boo campground up the street from it.  This is from someone who attended the place probably more than one summer and may have worked on the sign pictured (I see the posts for it appear to be tree trunks; when I was there I believe they were trying--unsuccessfully--to get some utility poles delivered). Jason McHuff 04:14, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Roman Catholic Diocese of Green Bay

message: I went to the GB Diocese page and added all the churches listed. I apologize for any errors, but I did my best. Looking at the result, this may require the churches getting their own page. All churches were taken from http://www.gbdioc.org/parish-school-locator.html   SEKluth (talk) 19:48, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Asking for help for Green Bay Diocese official 'Coat of Arms' to be added to this article. Since I have zero experience with this, I'm not able to research and lend a hand.
Regards, JoeHebda (talk) 17:56, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diocese Coat of Arms 
Talk:Roman Catholic Diocese of Superior

message: ===Bishops of Superior===
Recently changed list of bishops to a 3-column table so it would be easier to read the 'Term' dates.
Wondering about the 'undo' back to a List? Are there any guidelines of when a list should be used, or when a Table would be better?
I did try asking this question at Teahouse, but Teahouse seems to be broken right now...
JoeHebda (talk) 19:33, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  List vs Table? 

message: Recently changed list of bishops to a 3-column table so it would be easier to read the 'Term' dates.
Wondering about the 'undo' back to a List? Are there any guidelines of when a list should be used, or when a Table would be better?
I did try asking this question at Teahouse, but Teahouse seems to be broken right now...
JoeHebda (talk) 19:33, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Bishops of Superior

message: There is a new radio station, operating within the Diocese of Superior. WWEN (FM) is a Catholic radio station, which is now serving the Superior area. It's broadcast in the local area, at 88.1 FM (This is in addition to the station in Ashland, (WWMD) which is already mentioned in the article).
When I added this relevant fact to the page, my edit was reverted by anonymous user 32.218.42.55. They listed the reason as being "North Dakota radio network is irrelevant"
Although the parent network is based in North Dakota, this station is a local affiliate. WWEN is broadcast in the local area, with some local content. Being broadcast locally within the Diocese of Superior, it is certainly relevant to the local Diocese of Superior.
I fail to see how this content is irrelevant to the article. I suspect the revision by anonymous user 32.218.42.55 was vandalism. However, I will presume it may have been a good faith edit. And I wanted to explain how the information is relevant to the article. It's a LOCAL Catholic radio station! How is it not relevant? I want to revert back to my edit. Billertl (talk) 16:32, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I look at the article and the changes. I agree with Billertl that that WWEN FM is a local affiliate and should be readded to the Diocese of Superior article with a citation. Okay-I disagree with Billertl about the anonymous user: 32.218.42.55 about doing vandalism. 32.218.42.55 had done some excellent editing and I have no problems with that. I do feel 32.218.42.55 should open an account and that has been suggested by several users who have accounts with Wikipedia. I do feel the material inserted by Billertl should be reinserted with a citation. Thank you17:27, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Catholic radio station

message: As of July 2021, this article was modified to eliminate the nondescript term "Roman Catholic" in favor of the more precise distinction of "Latin Church" (the sui iuris church) and "Catholic Church" (the denomination). If you believe this edit to be in error or improper, please make the relevant reversion and open discussion on this talk page or my personal talk page. Thank you. ~ Pbritti (talk) 00:20, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: July 2021 Latin Church revision
Talk:Franciscan Sisters of Christian Charity

message: I propose to merge Franciscan Sisters of Christian Charity Sponsored Ministries into Franciscan Sisters of Christian Charity. I think that the content in the article on the non-profit that the congregation uses to run its ministries can easily be explained in the context of the congregation, and the congregation article is of a reasonable size that the merger will not cause any problems as far as article size is concerned. Jahaza (talk) 17:37, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: edited by a member of the order. The Banner talk 07:35, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI tag (October 2021)
Talk:Franciscan Sisters of Perpetual Adoration

message: I think that it would be better to have a page for each order. 84.9.83.105 22:12, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Splitting

message: There are articles for each of the orders. The above orders are related in that they have the original founders. Since, there are existing articles of the orders, this is not neccessary.Thank you-RFD 18:04, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  FSPA 
Talk:Racine Dominican Sisters

message: Why does a link on the CHI West page, showing The Congregation of the Dominican Sisters of St. Catherine of Siena of Kenosha, Inc. link to the Racine Dominicans entry?  The Kenosha Dominicans are/were a separate community from the Racine Dominicans.  Is this an error?  Tredzwater (talk) 14:43, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Every time you edit, you add in a block of text copied verbatim from another website - this is a clear violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies, and and such additions will be removed. Inaccurate or not (and you offer no proof of this), you do not have an exception to the rules. MikeWazowski (talk) 17:46, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link Error?
Talk:Samuel Stritch

message: I remember a front-page photograph of Cardinal Stritch in one of the Chicago newspapers, that captures him offering Mass (in Rome, I think), and elevating the communion host with one arm. This was of course taken in the short interval between his right-arm amputation and his death. This picture would be a great addition if anyone can locate it. I wonder if he, like Isaac Jogues required a papal dispensation in order to perform the sacramental functions that require use of the right hand? WHPratt (talk) 19:22, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poignant Photograph
Template talk:DRV notice

message: Hello. You recently speedy-deleted, or closed the deletion discussion for, the article . An editor has nominated this result/decision/outcome for deletion review. Your opinions on the closure or speedy-deletion of this article will be greatly appreciated.
(Put here, as there are multiple word options, but the pedant in me thinks it's important to be clear that it's not the article thats being reviewed on DRV, rather the decision. MartinRe 15:51, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Updated. There's also an option of providing two different versions for closing the discussion or speedy-deleting the article, but methinks it's best to make the process as simple as possible. --Deathphoenix ʕ 16:12, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestion

message: I created a new version for the relatively new Userbox debates, making the text more concise and generic.  I'd like to do the same here.
:--William Allen Simpson 15:44, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  DVRU note wording 

message: I made the text more general so that the template can be placed on the pages of editors other than those who closed the deletion discussion or speedily deleted the article. I had had the template placed on my talk page twice over the last three weeks for articles where I was neither the closer nor the speedy deleter, so I figured it might be better to allow it to be placed on the talk page of any editor with a relevant interest. (This is not intended to endorse canvassing in deletion reviews.) --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:53, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Generalized 

message: I am thinking of reverting this because the link fails if the deleter isn't notified on the same day. Stifle (talk) 08:07, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I hadn't actually built code that I expected to put into here yet.  Feel free.  When I do, the  parameter will be optional.  Cheers.  lifebaka++ 15:23, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reverting

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 06:29, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Template:DRVNote →  – Consistency with the naming scheme for the XfD notices, as established in 2020 at Template_talk:Afd_notice#Requested_move_21_April_2020. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 04:41, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 12 October 2023 

message: You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Deletion review § Links in DRV notice.  All the best, ‍—‍a smart kitten[meow] 20:19, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion at [[:Wikipedia talk:Deletion review#Links in DRV notice|Wikipedia talk:Deletion review §&nbsp;Links in DRV notice]]
Talk:WOCE (FM)

message: Per the WP:Disambig page, "If only a primary topic and one other topic require disambiguation, then disambiguation links are sufficient, and a disambiguation page is unnecessary." Since the radio station call letters are the primary identification and the acronym for a program to establish the role of the ocean in the climate is a secondary identification, a hat note is sufficient and requires no more steps than would a disambiguation page for people seeking the experiment. - Dravecky (talk) 23:33, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rationale for deletion of disambiguation page
Talk:Bay Coast Railroad

message: I'm not sure if the railroad is yet operating under the BCR name.  I believe they are, as CSX's junction list now lists BCR rather then ESHR.
If they are operating as BCR, someone needs to update the Class III Template to include BCR and move ESHR to the Historic section of the template. Lord Bodak 15:54, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Class III Template

message: I removed the unref indicator from the Wikiproject box after adding some text and references to the article. If you feel more citations are needed somewhere in the article, please hang tags at specific locations or leave a note here on the talk page. Folklore1 (talk) 17:35, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations 
Talk:Letters on the English

message: I added a "Citation needed" after the sentence: "Most modern English-language versions are based on a translation of the French text rather than Voltaire's English one". Indeed, the language in which the Letters were actually written is a controversial issue. See here for example (chapter 9).
Macek0l1ve (talk) 18:34, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Language of the letters 

message: I fixed a case of vandalism that someone made because they thought that a quote was wrong.
I do not know if the person was right or not, but what they did was a mistake. 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Letters_on_the_English&oldid=325564343)
Zen Clark (talk) 23:59, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quote
Talk:Parliamentary procedure

message: I've been requested to provide a rationale for the merger of parliamentary authority and parliamentary procedure.  The content of "parliamentary authority" describes how these tomes are integrated into parliamentary procedure, and much of the content of "parliamentary procedure" describes which authorities are used where.  It is unclear to me that there is a useful-to-readers dividing line between these two articles, given the 50%-75% overlap. -- Beland (talk) 07:34, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge rationale 

message: The Application WikiTrust for FireFox, breaks when the link for 'Weinbergs..' is tripped upon. 
WIll rever tif any objections, but until another solution is found, the removal of the broken link seems aapropriate at this time. Will follow up with what happened to 'Weinbergs..' in WIkipedia.
Richard416282 (talk) 19:09, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken WikiTrust by Absense of Link 

message: My recent edit to Parliamentary_procedure#History made a link to House of Commons of England, which I believe is the appropriate WP article on the House of Commons.  Also, I replaced the "in the House of Commons" by "for the House of Commons".  Was the original intent to say that there is a book called "House of Commons", if so, my edit needs to be reverted.  I presume the book was primarily written for members of the House of Commons, hence used the phrase "for..." instead of "in".  My "research" was minimal -- I just looked at the cited Encyclopedia Britannica article. This is way outside my expertise, though I am fascinated by it.--Guy vandegrift (talk) 11:14, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "in" or "for" the House of Commons? 

message: I would like to make some significant changes to the Parliamentary_procedure page.  I introduce the proposed changes here.  If there are not substantial arguments against the proposals, I will make the edits in a few weeks time. Natefin (talk) 19:05, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: On further consideration, I've decided the claim that "Robert's Rules of Order" is most common is too imprecise and too uncertain. Imprecise because "Robert's Rules of Order" can mean a number of related, but far from identical, things. Uncertain because there appears to be a trend towards procedures of "consensus", because "in use" by whom is not clarified, and because there is not, as far as I know, an authoritative survey on the matter. Instead, I will clarify that there are guides ranging from the more comprehensive to the more concise, and I will list some guides that Amazon rates as best sellers. Natefin (talk) 17:00, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  proposed changes