lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:What Car?

message: Does anyone know of the date/year that this magazine has been published since? Keen to find out, and improve the article accordingly. Michaeldouglas26 23:27, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: November 1973 2A02:C7C:5676:8D00:F9FE:B045:9933:D3EC (talk) 22:21, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  First publication check 

message: I bought a SEAT Ibiza online on 13th January 2021 from Bristol Street Motors SEAT Derby (now Vertu Motors), and it has broken down SEVEN times to date. I complained after the 5th breakdown and spoke to a guy called Jason Hurt, who I found to be rude and offhand. 
His solution was for me to drive the vehicle to Derby, 90 miles away, and they would inspect the car, log the mileage, which a lot was being towed, and deduct money off he purchase price, the car was 11 months old at the time. This was nearly £2000, which I found quite unfair as I believe the vehicle is not "fit for purpose", and wanted a replacement or full refund.
I contacted SEAT UK to complain and their solution was to ask the garage where the vehicle was being repaired if they would make me an offer for it. I am very disappointed to say the least that the after sales care is so shoddy and would like you to publish this letter to warn people about SEAT Derby (Vertu Motors).
If you wish to contact me my email is: ronzoefc14@hotmail.com and my mobile no. is 07905272976.
Thank you R Dalski 195.213.255.38 (talk) 11:37, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry to say it but there is nothing that Wikipedia can help with this.  Stepho  talk  12:12, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unhappy with car and dealership
Talk:Woodward Dream Cruise

message: —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.31.65.78 (talk) 20:47, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[University of Detroit Mercy|UDM]] in the news
Talk:150th Illinois Infantry Regiment

message: It does still need some work, missing the total unit strength. Lacks as to whether the unit was a part of any operations, battles, or had any combat experience.
Dougsnow 10:38, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 
Talk:Henrietta Vinton Davis

message: I suggest the photo be placed next (right) to the intro paragraph. The category box is a nuisance. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 20:13, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alignment 

message: Organization of this article is currently all out of whack. Biography section is hardly a biography and lists are her death right before the career section. Hopefully someone can address this soon. natemup (talk) 03:44, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article organization
Talk:21st Illinois Infantry Regiment

message: "The latter were later retrieved ... "  What does "latter" refer too - the color sgt?  Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 01:34, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: *My error, I meant the colors, might as well just explicitly mention them. Kges1901 (talk) 01:13, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  unclear sentence
Template talk:Disambig-Class

message: Please tag this with  and add to :Category:Classification templates. heqs ·:. 10:16, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Tra (Talk) 13:47, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Tag

message: 
 redirects to 
should not this  redirect to 
This would allow the standard links to WikiProject pages within each instance of the template use. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 11:35, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done - Good idea, the templates are equivalent in nature and completely intercompatible. Nihiltres{t.l} 16:08, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect ?

message: Would anyone oppose moving  to ? We could keep the text as "Disambig", but when displayed on a project template it will (by default) say "This article has been rated as Disambiguation-Class on the assessment scale", instead of "This article has been rated as Disambig-Class on the assessment scale". JohnnyMrNinja 07:09, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: We could also keep the redirects (for ease of use), and maybe have a bot cleanup so it displays properly. JohnnyMrNinja 07:10, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

text: My preference is to match whatever the associated category is in :Category:Articles by quality.  Since the category is currently called :Category:Disambig-Class articles, that's what I'd like to keep it as.  But I would not object to renaming both the category and this template to Disambiguation-Class.  If your goal is to have "This article has been rated as Disambiguation-Class on the assessment scale" on project templates, moving this template will not have that effect.  You need to change the value of the class paramater on each talk page.  You could create  as a redirect to here, and then use |class=Disambiguation to have the text display as you want it to.  --Scott Alter 07:48, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Brought it here. JohnnyMrNinja 08:08, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

text: Scott said "I would not object to renaming both the category and this template to Disambiguation-Class",. You agree with this? JohnnyMrNinja 17:55, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You have to do both or neither, not only one. He also would prefer to keep it as is, as would I. "Disambig" is shorter for one thing. — Rlevse • Talk •  18:15, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect more
Talk:Mysterio (Francis Klum)

message: *What about the second Mysterio, but what about Daniel Berkhart? Should there be a Mysterio article on him? You may also discuss about this on the Mysterio page. --The Dark Lord of Wiki (talk) 13:51, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Francis Klum and Quinten beck....but what about....
Talk:Chanokh Heynekh HaKohen Levin

message: Most sources seem to list the birth year as 1798. His 1870 death registration lists his age as 76 thus placing the birth year as 1794. A second issue with the birth year relates to the young ("kad havina talya") chanoch Henoch meeting his brother-in-law Rabbi Yechezkel Nomberg (who later became the rabbi in Lodz) and his brother-in-law's father when they came to Lutomiersk to prepare for the marriage to his sister Esther as related in the Omer Man/Tel Talpiyos published by his relative Meir Nomberg. The story was related by Rabbi Chanoch Henoch to Meir Nomberg in Aleksander at the end of his life. Based on Esther's death registration, she was born in 1800, making it unlikely that he was a young child at his sister's marriage. It is likely that either the story or the death registration documents are inaccurate.
KosherJava (talk) 19:29, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Birth Year

message: the sidebar is crowded, and much of the family information should be moved out of the sidebar.
KosherJava (talk) 19:29, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Family Section Needed
Talk:Road & Travel Magazine

message: Please see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard#Sophisticated paid editing scheme.  Please do not remove the  tag until you have thoroughly checked the article.  Please leave a note at WP:COIN if you clean up the article.  Thank you. - Jehochman  Talk 04:36, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: COI Tag

message: While I have edited this article in the past with a great effort to show NPOV, I have COI here and should not edit. But I would like this article to be considered as a way to establish notability on this subject, especially as it pertains to the publication being targeted toward women. Thank you.  Erikd7 16:20, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: NYTimes Article for Notability Consideration
Talk:Gennady Kuzmin

message: It probably doesn't matter much (six of one, half a dozen of another), but should we use "Gennady" or "Gennadi"?  Both Chessgames.com and his FIDE rating card use Gennadi.  On the other hand, Jeremy Gaige, an older source, uses Gennady, as does Olimpbase.  (The Olimpbase spelling may be based on his 1974 Olympiad appearance, which would be older too.)  Quale (talk) 04:11, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The two forms of the name appear quite interchangeable. Interesting that FIDE now use Gennadi, as Kazic's book (which is a complete record of FIDE events, written by a FIDE official and endorsed by the FIDE President in the Introduction) used Gennady back in 1974! When I started this article, I would have been heavily influenced by The Oxford Companion ('y'). Brace also goes for the 'y' version, whereas Golombek chooses 'i'. A Google search gives 40,000 vs 25,000 in favour of 'Gennady Kuzmin' - probably as good a guide as any (if popularity counts for anything). Brittle heaven (talk) 23:37, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I think we should apply WP:RUS here. The Russian form is "Геннадий". That article by Wikiproject Russia recommends that the –ий ending be transliterated as -y for names of people and adjectives of Russian origin. MaxBrowne (talk) 06:38, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gennady vs. Gennadi 

message: Please put name's accents. Chvsanchez (talk) 14:53, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accents
Talk:Road & Track

message: I have just updated the article, adding relevant information and sources. Feel free to add content and/or discuss! Tomj (talk) 14:56, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: July, 2009 update

message: Can someone supply information on Henry N. Manney III ?  He was one of R&T's star writers in the 1960's, with a wry sense of humor.  BMJ-pdx (talk) 19:44, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Henry N. Manney III
Talk:FOID

message: I have deleted the sections of this article describing the supposed slang expression "foid", a person who "[spends] large amounts of time researching specialist and often obscure subjects via the internet."  I've been unable to verify that this slang term is actually in use, and there were no references for it.  Perhaps that part of the article was added as a joke.  If "foid" really is a slang term with that meaning, and someone wants to document it on Wikipedia, they should create a new, separate article with a different title -- something along the lines of "Foid (slang)".  This hypothetical new article should cite reliable references.  — Mudwater 23:26, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Supposed slang expression

message: In the travel industry, FOID is Form of ID.  Might need a placeholder page and disambiguation entry.
38.98.183.33 20:12, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Other definitions
Talk:Filing (law)

message: The article currently  reads more like a page about filing fees than it does about filing. It reads to me like someone with an agenda (filing fees are bad) has come along and added some stuff about filing fees and then someone else has tried to balance it out by adding some more stuff about filing fees. I suggest scrapping all the stuff about filing fees except for a minor mention that they exist One square on the chessboard (talk) 23:32, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've shortened the mention in the lead, seems alright now. - RoyBoy 23:17, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Filing Fees 

message: Umm.... "filed" redirects here, butthe word can also mean the past tense of "filet". For example, the paper shredder filed the paper into thin slices. (or soemthing like that)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.43.148.110 (talk) 06:05, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambugation 

message: This page seems to concentrate on the US.  Does anywhere else use this term?   Bevo74 (talk) 17:29, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is Filing just US
Talk:Posh and Becks

message: I have added more to the article and restructured it with sections. Note that this is important as a (popular) cultural term in the UK as well as being a nickname for a well-known couple. — Jonathan Bowen 23:28, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expanded 

message: *As I stated on the talk page of the List of entertainers by nickname article, in concern to the suggestion that the Posh and Becks article be merged into the List of entertainers by nickname article, I don't feel that it should be. I feel that at least one celebrity supercouple, known often by their nickname that has impacted the world, should be included on Wikipedia, besides Bennifer. Flyer22 01:11, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestion of merge topic

message: I suggest to those who have "voted" to keep this article, please read the following section of the "On notability" essay. This article falls right into this category. Bumm13 03:39, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The editors who "voted" Keep are experienced Wikipedian editors. And one usually votes popular culture articles right off of Wikipedia, mostly because that editor feels that they (the ones in question) don't meet notability guidelines, yet that editor felt that this one does. This article will be improved over time, but I see no rush, and I see no reason not to trust that these editors had good reason for keeping this article. Flyer22 04:39, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commentary about Posh and Becks notability - reading suggestion 

message: The references currently include:
Morton, Andrew R.. Posh & Becks. Simon Spotlight Entertainment. .  
Motion, Andrew, Posh & Becks. Simon & Schuster, 2007. . 
These are the same book - http://books.google.com/books?id=-zd9GQAACAAJ&dq=isbn:9781416953869. I doubt taht Andrew Motion will be pleased at being credited with it ! -- Beardo (talk) 23:31, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I'll take care of the same reference being duplicated. There's a better way to duplicate it. Thanks for correcting the name from Andrew Motion to Andrew Morton. Flyer22 (talk) 00:33, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:Karun Treasure

message: When this article was started, "Karun Treasure" was the most common term encountered in English language sources across the internet. This seems to have evolved a bit as the artifacts gained more motoriety.
:"Karun Treasure" gives 2060 results in Google search restricted to English-language sources,mostly Turkish sources,
:"Lydian Treasure" gives 2850 results in Google search restricted to English-language sources,
:"Lydian Hoard" gives 5070 results in Google search restricted to English-language sources,
:"Croesus Treasure" (or "Croesus' Treasure") gives 2060 results in Google search restricted to English-language sources, while the term is intrinsically incorrect, King Croesus was seemingly not the owner nor were they placed in his tomb for him,("Treasure of Croesus" of course, gives 75.000 odd results, almost all used in an abstract context.)
Having contributed to the present state of this article a good deal, I would come in favor of moving the title to "Lydian Treasure", and not to "Lydian Hoard", the word "treasure", in my view, subject to discussion of course, being more easily recognizable and understandable internationally. Such a move would also offer the advantage of stressing whose (which people's) art and legacy they are. 88.250.174.109 (talk) 20:25, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Yaws

message: Hey there, whoever cares! I was doing some studying on yaws and thought this article could do with a bit of tidy-up, and bit more clarification about the stages. If anyone who knows better doesn't like it, feel free to revert.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.44.152.7 (talk) 23:56, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The file page says that the woman was vaccinated with neosalvarsan, and neosalvarsan is not a vaccine, so it may be Tropenmuseum's or the photographer's error. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 13:52, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update and reformat 

message: Here is a photo that could be used if anyone wants to go to the trouble of adding it. They are works of the US govt which makes them license-compatible with Wikipedia.  Rees11 (talk) 23:39, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New photos available 

message: Br Med Bull doi:10.1093/bmb/ldu037 JFW | T@lk 16:44, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Challenges of eradciation (Lancet Infectious Diseases) doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00136-X JFW | T@lk 12:11, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review 

message: In 2012 the WHO wanted to eradicate it by 2020. What is the current status? The latest numbers are from 2016. Here the WHO reports 80,000 suspected cases in 2018, that is higher than the 2016 number. --mfb (talk) 08:25, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outdated since 2016
Talk:Etcetera (cat)

message: I tagged this article as unencyclopedic because it makes no reference to the work of fiction which this (ostensibly) fictional cat appears in.  There is no way to establish notability without a reference of some sort.  Joshua Crowgey 23:40, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ellen Spiro

message: I wrote the info for this page.  I'm a fan of Spiro's work so I guess I got carried away.  I'll go through and clean it up... are there any parts that you think are particularly 
"un-neutral"?  Is it OK to leave the awards section?  I see other filmmakers have those, but I new to all of this, your feedback is appreciated. BLBaker 22:05, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Second sentence should be relevant, not what it is now.  "one person crew" is for a later section.  What she is "known for" is an unsourced statement and should be removed.  This paragraph should contain a simple summary of her body of work.  Second paragraph should not say "award winning". Awards should not be listed, but worked into paragraphs where relevant.  Intro section should be generally shorter.  Block quote borders on plagiarism, and is too long to read.  It should include only the relevant few quotes.  "Like the subjects she chooses" remark is ungrammatical, and not NPOV.  how she is "considered" is, again, an unsourced statement.  I suggest these changes Youdontsmellbad (talk) 10:39, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article reads like a press release for Spiro. It needs to be edited for neutral point-of-view. --Jeremy Butler 10:49, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Press Release? 
Talk:Events preceding World War II in Europe

message: This article title is odd.  "Preceding events" of what?  Preceding what?  "European Theater" is a place, not a point in time.  How can an event precede a place? RickK 03:09, 10 Nov 2003 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old title 

message: "The popular support for democracy was limited, and often perceived as "foreign" or "alien" to the German nation. Social tensions after the world wide economic depression following the Stock Market Crash of 1929 aggravated the political situation."
Germany did not oppose democracy, it had a problem with the weak system of proportional representation and the Weimar Government. And the second sentence is just...well. Social tensions? It was a bloody depression! Germany was hit second hardest by the Great Depression after the US, because the US was supporting Germany after the collapse of Germany's currency. It then withdrew its financial support and Germany was plunged into an economic slump which Hitler promised to get them out of.
The non-npov tag is wholly justified (no popular support for democracy? How on earth do you suppose the Nazis were elected in the first place?), but I'd personally add something harsher- cleanup at the very least. I'd prefer deletion. --Dandelions 02:16, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, and this is complete and utter nonsense, too:
"King Victor Emmanuel III of Italy invited Benito Mussolini and his Fascist Party to form a government on October 30,1922, following their largely symbolic Marcia su Roma of October 28, 1922 (March on Rome)."
The March on Rome was a victory march after Mussolini had been asked to become prime minister. It was originally planned as a violent march to seize power, but became a victory march after Mussolini was appointed legally. Mussolini was asked to form a government on the 29th of October by the king, pre-empting the march. -- Dandelions 02:27, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  I think this article is beyond redemption. 

message: Per request: 1) USSR had a formal military alliance with Czechoslovakia, 2) Beneš did not back Stalin before WWI, its a nonsense 3) the invasion was celebrated only by Germans, not by hundreds of thousands of Czechs living there 4) The so-called Sudetenland never belonged to Austria, so it could not "remained" with it, and it wasn't just "given" to Czechoslovakia as it was part of Bohemia/Czechia since "time immemorial". Qertis (talk) 22:33, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Czechoslovakia
Talk:Up Above the World

message: ----
An anonymous contributor has added a few comments to the plot summary but seems to have been frightened off when both his edits were reverted. Could anyone who has recently read the book check what mistakes (if any) there are in the text below? (I have highlighted the user's comments.) Thanks in advance, <KF> 22:29, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
Talk:John Cameron (Alberta politician)

message: Hi! On Saturday, I was "I'll save this, see if I want to review it, do the review, and then actually click the button to confirm I want review." Turns out, another user did a GA review in the mean time! I'm going to gradually go through my comments, and post anything unresolved.
* In the infobox, you refer to Cameron as an Alderman. Was this the term used at the time by council? If so, why does it not appear at least once in the article? While most readers won't be familiar with the mostly abandoned term, it should at least be used once.
* The 1914 Edmonton Bulletin article simply says Cameron "is a Liberal". The way this is presented in the article sounds like he was actually registered as a member of the Provincial and Federal Liberal parties, something we can't confirm with this one article. Just saying he was a Liberal is better, as he likely carried this ideology into municipal politics.
That's for starts, there more when I have the opportunity to weed my comments.  --  Zanimum (talk) 20:08, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Many thanks for the further comments. The things you've listed above are done! By the way, if you are interested, I have two other short-ish articles up as well! Connormah (talk) 05:49, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good article review comments 
Talk:Romanization of Armenian

message: See Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Armenian) for Wikipedia conventions.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dbachmann (talk • contribs) 16:45, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

message: Definitely, this is a good scheme. It matches ISO, except for
* ë → ē, t’ → ṫ, k’ → q (entirely new);
* c’ → ć, p’ → ṕ (merging apostrophe to an accent);
* j → dz, č̣ → ch, ow → u, ò → ō (which are the winners when 5 schemes “vote”);
* ç → c (which is a tie when the 5 schemes “vote”);
* ǰ → j (which is present in ALA and BGN).
However, this scheme is not in the referenced document, and I cannot find it defined anywhere via Google.  Is not this original research?
--76.218.120.86 (talk) 02:59, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Versatile option