Talk:Freeza Saga

message: When dealing with the anime, the FUNimation spelling should be "Frieza Saga" as this article was before. However, we have already adopted the name "Freeza" for the spelling we use for the name of the character and it does not make sense to have them spelled differently. Of course, the term "Freeza Saga" does not just apply to the anime, so the manga spelling is okay. This is tricky, but I'm leaning towards consistency. We could go the other way and rename them both to "Frieza", but that breaks the almost consistency we have with using the manga names for the characters. Any thoughts? JRP 01:21, 9 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I vote for consistency with the manga names (although I havn't read any of the manga), as they are the original.  So I believe Freeza is the better (and more consistent) choice.  BCKILLa 08:26, 1 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I have modified all instances of Frieza to Freeza except in the chapter list. -- ReyBrujo 02:53, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Frieza vs. Freeza?

message: I'm a little offended at the suggestion that all episodes after the Frieza saga have jumped the shark. This phrase basically states that the Cell and Buu Sagas were "passed their peak" and has "lost the charm of the earlier episodes." This is entirely PoV as I, and many others believe that the later sags were just as good if not better than the earlier ones. Do you think this section should be removed? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.39.167.126 (talk • contribs) 
:Feel free to either cite a source for the paragraph, or delete it. -- ReyBrujo 02:53, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jumped the Shark? 

message: The article is too detailed as to how the saga develops. The tone is familiar, like:
Through the battle, Piccolo controls the upper hand. But not for long. Freeza transforms again, nearly tripling his power level, This would be the second transformation but third stage.
In bold the sentences that add nothing to the section. This part could be shortened to Although Piccolo controlled the battle, the situation changed once Freeza transformed himself. -- ReyBrujo 02:53, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Tone

message: As of June 29, 2006, this article is tagged for wfycation, while no other DBZ sagas are.  Does anyone know what the particular objections to this article are?  (Knowing that would certainly ease the wfycation process.)  Is it just that it's too long?  Consider that this saga is close to double the length of most other sagas in DBZ.  -- Byakuren 16:23, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Plot summary has 16 wikilinks in over 1700 words (rough count with regexp). I think that qualifies as needing some wikilinks. I don't mean it needs 1000, but at least wikilink terms associated with the plot, in example, "third stage", "power level", "fusion", "Kaio-ken", etc. Imagine for a second you know nothing about Dragon Ball, how are you supposed to know what a "Super Saiyan"? If the other articles are missing wikilinks, please tag them as well. -- ReyBrujo 17:29, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Excellent, I'll put in some wiki-time later...  Anyting else, other than internal linking and some trimming?  Thx!  -- Byakuren 19:57, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Why wikify ''this'' saga in particular? 

message: Recently, I've noticed that, in the Freeza Saga description, "Death Beam" has been changed numerous times to "finger beam". Now, I know for the fact that Freeza's finger beam is called "Death Beam". After all, I've known of the name to be used numerous times in reference to that particular move. But why, now, has it been changed to "finger beam"? Most people call it "Death Beam", no-one calls it "finger beam".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Super Vegetto (talk • contribs) 16:19, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Finger Beam or Death Beam?

message: :Image:Frieza4f.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:34, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Frieza4f.jpg

message: Why has this been repeatedly deleted and left with just a simple paragraph that says very little? DBZROCKS claims that it was just 'crappy text' that 'will be rewritten' but surely it would be better to edit what's already there so that the article actually gives remotely useful information in the meantime. Maybe the old text was 'crufty' but at least it did what wikipedia is supposed to do: give detailed information on a topic, which the article in its current state does not. ::..SMI..:: 23:14, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This kind of information is not what wikipedia is about. If you look at that wall of text you can see that it suffers from a bloated and poorly written plot summary, excess information on Funimation dub tapes and the information is restated in every article. None of this could be edited from its current form which is why it is much simpliar to just get rid of it all and start anew. DBZROCKSIts over 9000!!! 23:23, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion