Talk:Sacramento, California/Archive 1

message: Maybe we should add UC Davis in the "education" subcategory. It's only 15 miles west of downtown and Davis is considered a city of the metropolitan area. Just a thought...
:A good idea, but a couple of problems: 1. It's not in Sacramento. 2. It's not in Sacramento County, 3.It's not even connected to Sacramento proper, or even West Sacramento (a river and flood-plain seperate the two.Rsm99833 22:17, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Those particlular branches, I see nothing wrong with listing them. However, the question was asked about UC Davis main campus. Basically, if it's in the city limits, go ahead an list it.Rsm99833 15:07, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  UC Davis 

message: Although I personally enjoy this site, is it really appropriate for a wiki entry for the city of Sacramento?Seems like it would be more appropriate in an article about "Sacramento Culture", under a Sacramento catagory, akin to articles under catagories in Category:Los Angeles and Category:San Francisco. --scupper 01:03, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  External link: suckramento.com 

message: Should a Sacramento Catagory be created and a Sacramento History article created using the contributions in the History section, then replace the content with a smaller summary of the city's history for the Sacramento, California article?
--scupper 01:13, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Based on my experience with Los Angeles, I would recommend waiting as long as you can before splitting sections into separate articles. Rather than a promotion, it can be more like an exile. On the matter of a ":Category:Sacramento, California" category, the :Category:Sacramento County, California serves as a catchall now and contains many items that could be moved to a city-specific category, for example Sacramento Bee. So it is probably worthwhile top make a city category. -Willmcw 01:40, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section: History/Summary/creation of Sacramento History article 

message: Since a lot of worthies have been (justifiably) shifted to list pages, maybe Dorothea Puente doesn't quite rate the front-page treatment. Regretably, she's also in the Sac killer company of Richard Chase, Gerald and Charlene Gallego, Ted Kaczynski, the "East Area rapist," Morris Solomon, Eric Royce Leonard, and Nikolay Soltys, among others. Squib 21:38, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Serial killers 

message: This page makes that claim; however Sacramento was incorporated on February 27, 1850.  San Francisco was incorporated nine days earlier, on February 18, 1850.
--GraemeMcRae 06:58, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: SF County was created February 18 by the legislature.  SF County government got going on 04/01, then just days later on 04/05 the legislature passed an incorporation act for the city.  The city charter passed on 04/15 so that's considered the date of record for San Francisco, and Mayor Geary was sworn in on 05/01.  The city and county were merged into their current structure years later in 1856. ( ) — RandallJones 18:54, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: That's the date they use on the official SF web site.— RandallJones 00:20, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is Sacramento really the oldest incorporated city in CA? 

message: I'm skeptical about the claim that "Amtrak is the most popular ground transportation choice in the City of Sacramento." Is there a reference for this statistic? Rolofft
:I've removed it. It's also ambiguous; any such statements should provide at least a little context, and at least a definition of "most popular." Demi T/C 23:30, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amtrak 

message: The article states, "The oldest part of the town besides Sutter's Fort is Old Sacramento [...]". I don't remember where I heard this, but I think that the current Sutter's Fort site is a replica. I could check it out if no one else here knows for sure. Jobarts-Talk 06:18, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sutter's Fort 

message: The external link labeled "Sacramento Pictures" is to a personal blog with a few photos of Sacramento. Is this an appropriate external link?--scupper 17:54, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd have to say no. Scrub it. Rsm99833 18:00, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Link "Sacramento Pictures" 

message: There is a survey in progress at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (settlements) to determine if there is consensus on a proposed change to the U.S. city naming conventions to be consistent with other countries, in particular Canada. --Serge 05:45, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: However the proposal would allow U.S. cities to be inconsistent with the vast majority of other U.S. cities and towns, which (with a few exceptions) all use the "city, state" convention. -Will Beback 23:39, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Survey on proposal to make U.S. city naming guidelines consistent with others countries 

message: kzz* 23:26, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  good town 

message: This article states Sac is an area of 2.5 million. Being as that the 2005 estimate of the Sacramento–Arden-Arcade–Roseville CA MSA is 2,042,283 and the CSA or combined statistical area which takes in more counties is Sacramento–Arden-Arcade–Truckee CA–NV 2,187,694, an extremely broad definition of the metro. How do you get to 2.5? Its important to be accurate here, Sacramento is big and growing fast but 2.5 million is rediculous. Im changing it to 2.2 million adjusting for growth in the last year. You have to understand that once you get a certain distance away from a place, it stops being that place and that if you go by such broad definitions other places would be much larger also.
:Yolo county perhaps? Nmpls 00:36, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population 2.5 million? 

message: I'm considering drafting a part on the flood risk and history of Sacramento, under the Geo and Climate section.  Anyone have any objections, or want to help?  --Sacdelicious 06:47, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Reordered page to keep conversations flowed in order from top (first comment) to bottom (most recent). Ronbo76 06:56, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You may wish to read:
*Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
*Wikipedia:Verifiability
*Wikipedia:Citing sources. That paragraph tells you how to properly cite a fact backed up by a reliable source.    Ronbo76 06:59, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sacramento Flood Risk 

message: *Timeline - While already listed as a root source/reference, this timeline delineates many historical firsts for city and state history. Ronbo76 17:33, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timeline on Sacramento history - another good source 

message: Is there a way to find demographic information on Sacramento's neighborhoods. I'm trying to start neighborhood pages--very incomplete so far and the articles that are started are VERY basic but this would add some interesting info about diversity, etc (if it is even kept track of??) Alamar2001 04:17, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Contact KCRA Channel 3 or check their website. I know they have some demogrphics. If not try The Sac PD or Chamber of Commerce or even Sac City Hall.--Amadscientist 20:10, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

text: There might be some informaton on the Sacramento Council of Governments website: http://www.sacog.org/ --DevinCook 04:48, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Demographic Information 

message: seems that some of data on the climate section is a little inacturate according to this  http://www.wrh.noaa.gov/wrh/techMemos/272.pdf
i would think the nws would be quite a bit more accurate then the source currently being sited.
~Why does the climate section speculate that summer 2007 is going to be  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.164.223.36 (talk) 05:02, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Take a breather. The second link you posted wasn't the NWS--that's why I said what I did. I'll fix the page with some of the info from the NWS. Killiondude (talk) 23:53, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

text: My apologies. I didn't look at the changes carefully enough. But we're all human, so there really was no need for you to get so upset. I changed the annual average rainfall to reflect the NWS page. I'll change the other thing back to what you added too (we don't have a source for that fact, so I'll trust the site you used). Killiondude (talk) 00:24, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  climate 

message: If you would like, Amadscientist, we could make a whole article for Arts in Sacramento, California or Culture in Sacramento, California. Do you think that's a good idea? I think culture would be more standard and we could get sports and notable people out of that section. Basar 23:12, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Just saw this today. Uhm....to be honest, there certainly is enough there for it. However I would want to look at other city pages to see how else it has been done. I like the idea, but would still want something noted on the main page. What do you think?--Amadscientist 09:18, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ya, I think what you already have on the main page should stay, and it could simply be expanded on in its own page, that is, if you want to expand it. My three favorite city articles, San Francisco, Boston, and New York City all have a similar setup. Basar 09:33, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I have started a subpage in my sandbox to work on for Arts in Sacramento, California. I will decide on a finished page title as I work on it. It may very well end up as a culture page.--Amadscientist 00:59, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arts section 

message: "In the early 1990s, Mayor Joe Serna attempted to lure the Los Angeles Raiders football team to Sacramento, selling $50 million cents in bonds as earnest money."
50 million cents? or dollars?
sorry, forgot to sign above comment
Лёха Фурсов: Sacrublood 16:44, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this right? 

message: What keeps happening? Everytime somebody puts a good picture of Sacramento on the page, it keeps going back to the current and crappy one. I don't have a good picture of Sacramento, but somebody really needs to put a better one up. This one serves the city no justice. Soy Milk Jim (talk) 07:31, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: What does everyone think of this?
<BR>Xde13 02:51, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  City picture 

message: If anyone is interested, this list is up for deletion, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of radio stations in Sacramento. DHowell (talk) 22:02, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[List of radio stations in Sacramento]] up for deletion 

message: "The City of Sacramento expends considerable effort to keep state agencies from moving outside the city limits." Could this be referenced or somehow verified? I live in the Sacramento metro area and I didn't know this... doesn't mean its not true, but all the same.Killiondude (talk) 07:07, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been in the article a while, added by an anon in December 2005. The rest of the edit seems factual and neutral, but we should still try to find a source for it. I'd imagine the Sacramento Bee  might have coverage of such an effort.  ·:· Will Beback  ·:· 08:25, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I found this, but it was a one time event. I've been looking for other instances of the city making deals to keep state agencies in, but so far I have come up short. I'll continue my search though. Killiondude (talk) 01:24, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source? 

message: I'll leave this here for consideration. I don't know exactly how it should fit into the article, but I think this panorama turned out quite well. ---J.S  (T/C/WRE) 03:08, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. :)  I would like to see it used in the article... is there a good place to stick it? ---J.S  (T/C/WRE) 05:07, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

text: I added it to that article. ---J.S  (T/C/WRE) 16:57, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

text: You might wanna leave a note on his talk page to let him know you're using it, but in short he released it under a Creative Commons 3.0 license. Which means other people can use it, "under the conditions that you appropriately attribute it". Attribute it to him. You can see the full size photo at this link. Killiondude (talk) 00:19, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

text: yeah, the full size is at that link.  I have an uncropped version of the picture - but it really did need to be cropped.  You can use my image if you use the following credit line somewhere near it: "© Justin Smith / Wikimedia Commons, CC-By-SA-3.0" - Linking to the page where the image is from is also appreciated: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Sacramento_Skyline_(cropped).jpg.  I appreciate the interest. :) Where do you plan on using it? ---J.S  (T/C/WRE) 01:04, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I love the image but is it possible to try the full version like we see in similar articles, without the scroll bar? To see the full sky line.--Amadscientist (talk) 00:54, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

text: The editor has fixed the license but the image was very large for the page even with a high resolution setting on my screen was difficult to view without scrolling.--Amadscientist (talk) 00:55, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Panorama of Sacramento 

message: A close look at the link used on this page shows that someone has violated the applicable copyright of the registere Wikicommons member who holds a lisence of Sharealike 3.0.
The image was uploaded to Wikipedia in violation of policy, and copyright by publishing it on Wiki as a Public Domain image. I am replacing the image with a direct link to the wikimedia commons upload page as should have been done and will tag the other image for speedy deletion.--Amadscientist (talk) 00:59, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The editor has fixed the license but the image was very large for the page even with a high resolution setting on my screen was difficult to view without scrolling.--Amadscientist (talk) 00:55, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright violation of image

message: Quick question: is the nickname section of the article's header excessive. Currently, for the city's nicknames, it lists: River City, Sac, Sac-Town, Almond Capital of the World, Big Tomato, Camellia City, City of Trees, Sacto, Sactown, Sacramental, Sacratomato. I have never heard the nicknames "Sacramental" or "Camellia City". "Almond Capital of the World" is more of a title than a nickname. Should we scale down this list? -DevinCook (talk) 10:33, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Its been scaled down many a time. I've had it on my watchlist for awhile now, and whenever somebody scales it down, another comes in and adds the "nicknames" back to it. I'll fix it again, but it is a semi-ridiculous cycle. - Killiondude (talk) 19:14, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah. ...I'm still fond of Sacratomato though. :) Thank you for your help. -DevinCook (talk) 19:21, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: They all need sources... but it's not really worth the fight. ---J.S  (T/C/WRE) 01:08, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nicknames - Perhaps Excessive? 

message: See http://www.news10.net/news/local/story.aspx?storyid=50924&provider=top - UFO spotted by people, local media. Powerzilla (talk) 17:24, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That's.... interesting. Killiondude (talk) 17:34, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a video link in this source. Powerzilla (talk) 17:56, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It could be like what happened in Stephenville, Texas all over again. Powerzilla (talk) 18:07, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  UFO 

message: Okay. Discussion time. Parkway-South Sacramento, California isn't in the list of unincorporated places, so I'm going to add it. But this got me thinking about the area of Parkway. The article states that Parkway is in Area Two of the city. According to this map from the City of Sacramento, Parkway seems to be in city limits, while the Census Bureau says Parkway-South Sacramento is a Census-designated place. 
Is a portion of Parkway in city limits while another is the CDP? Common sense tells me that Parkway can't (entirely) be both in the city limits while a CDP. Should it be listed both as in Area Two and in the Unincorporated Areas?
For now I'm going to add a section to the Unincorporated Areas titled South Sacramento. I'll link it to the Parkway-South Sac wiki article, but for now I'm only going to include info about South Sac primarily from here. Killiondude (talk) 07:00, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  South Sacramento 

message: I feel like Jackie Greene should be mentioned, as he is a local musician who played on Conan 'O Brian and tours with the remaining Grateful Dead. I added Agent Ribbons for popular alt band, although the presently listed ones (bidwel, etc) aren't really that popular or payed attention to outside of Sacramento.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.26.165.144 (talk) 05:59, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Jackie Greene is already listed on the page for that kind of trivia. See Sacramento entertainers. -----J.S  (T/C/WRE) 18:26, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Music 

message: Hi. I'm looking for a dedicated researcher who lives in Sacramento, and who would be willing to spend some time in the Sacramento public library researching through old microfish of the Sacramento Bee from 1974-1980. You can reach me through my talk. —Dixie Brown (talk) 22:02, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Looking for researcher 

message: This section includes important historical information regarding the city's heritage, but more sources are needed.  I've started to work on the phrasing and grammar, which does need some work, but more importantly, help is needed to provide more sourcing to assist contributors expanding this section, rather than reverting it.  Those familiar with the area know that immigration during the mining boom and building of the railroads is an important aspect of the Central Valley's history.  Steveozone (talk) 04:46, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remnants of Downtown Sacramento's Chinatown 

message: I like the new image. However, is it possible to find or get a similar image that included the Tower Bridge? It would represent the city much better that way. Something like the panarama but in a regular landscape size.--Amadscientist (talk) 01:04, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Some day I'd like to get back up on the Ziggurat and take another picture with a wide-angle lens and my much nicer camera then I had previously.  If I do, I swear I'll donate it to wikipedia.  ---J.S  (T/C/WRE) 18:44, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox Image 

message: I mean, there are tree branches in the way.  Here are some good ones: http://www.city-data.com/forum/sacramento/545694-picture-thread-2.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.121.67.202 (talk) 03:27, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can't we find a better picture of the city? 

message: "Untamed City" seems like a rather odd translation of "urbs indomita" - I'm pretty sure "Indomitable City" would be a more accurate version. (If evidence is needed, see this book's note on it. I took the liberty of changing it - if anyone has an issue with it, feel free to change it back.
69.62.157.12 (talk) 04:48, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  City Motto 

message: The city of Bethlehem is located in the West Bank. The city of Sacramento officially recognizes the city as being in Palestine and not Israel. I made the appropriate corrections on May 24th, 2011.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.123.234.111 (talk) 19:13, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bethlehem as a Sister City 

message: I guess the title of this article should be Sacramento, not Sacramento, California. Because Sacramento is a redirect to this page, anyways. Just like Seattle doesn't have the title Seattle, Washington, it's simply Seattle. Both are capitals of a US state, and the most well known things for that name. Ark25 (talk) 18:04, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: City, State is a very common naming scheme. I wonder what the MoS says on this topic? ---J.S  (T/C/WRE) 22:40, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: There has been some kind of change. Bigger well-known cities like New York are now being named as indicated. Remember a couple of years ago when it had to be City, State, US? I think city, state is better. ----moreno oso (talk) 22:49, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't recall ever having "City, State, US", but "City, State" is the standard for all US cities except those which the AP style guide say can be referred to just as "City". I don't see a good reason for violating the naming convention.   Will Beback  talk   22:55, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

text: WP:NC:CITY.  --Born2cycle (talk) 00:06, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

text: Thanks for the reply, Born2cycle. When I started this topic I didn't knew about the naming convention, but now I do and I agree with it. Not sure what makes Detroit, Honolulu, Houston, Indianapolis, etc. to be exceptions but I imagine it's about their size and possibly also their fame. However, as I am not an US citizen and I never lived in US, still, for me Sacramento its quite famous (and also Palo Alto and a few others I think), because its name is mentioned all the time in the IT newspapers. But I must say I'm not realy entitled to make a judgement about the naming convention as a US citizen can be. Also Baton Rouge is famous to me too, the others not - Boise and Thallahassee, It's probably a subjective decision what cities make the exception and therefore it can always be challenged - and doing that doesn't really seem to be productive. So I don't want to insist. Just remember this: from an outsider point of view, Sacramento and Baton Rouge are quite famous. Thanks —  Ark25  (talk) 15:58, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I understand.  Because fame relative to other uses of the same term is a factor to be considered in cases where there is more than one use for a name, fame is sometimes mistakenly taken to be a a general naming criteria.  It is not.  In general, when the most commonly used name for a subject is unique, that's the name of the subject, regardless of how famous that subject may or may not be.  See WP:TITLE.  The guideline for U.S. cities currently contradicts this, and it's one of the few remaining guidelines that do.  --Born2cycle (talk) 16:16, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title should be Sacramento 

message: Earlier this afternoon an anon IP made an unsourced edit of a non-notable band, Trash Talk (band), to this article. That was reverted by me and very quickly followed by a regular editor at 21:21 with a source. I followed the anon IP to the band's article which is very poorly sourced. Request another editor take a look at today's post. It is not necessary for this band to be posted to the article as they do not contribute materially either to the article or the city itself. ----moreno oso (talk) 22:09, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anon IP revert followed closely by a regular editor 

message: We have two choices of weather reporting stations for Sacramento: California State University, which is closer to the centre of downtown, and Sacramento Int'l Airport. Since Sacramento is one of the last major US city articles where the climate data is not to the nearest 0.1 ℉, I am going to use the airport data for now. The table needs updating anyway. It is perhaps unchecked IP-induced fabrication that does not match the source. --HXL 何献龙 12:50, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I patched up the weather box template a few days ago to add all available data from the NOAA source given to the table. I double checked that it is factual. Ks0stm (T•C•G) 02:24, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weather reporting station 

message: The main use of the name "Sacramento" refers to the U.S. state.  The comments about U.S. state naming conventions are therefore nullified in light of other major examples like Los Angeles, Chicago, and New York City, among others.  Even Brooklyn doesn't have its state of New York trailing it in the article name.  What on Earth is wrong with just moving this page to Sacramento and putting the notice at the top of that page linking to the disambiguation instead?  This makes absolutely no sense!  CycloneGU (talk) 18:34, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: We just had a formal discussion on this last month. Can you at least let it rest for a few more weeks? Jack B108 (talk) 23:49, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I can see that above this.  I just think it's a silly result given Salt Lake City, the 127th most populated city in the U.S., is considered eligible to violate the "City, State" rule and Memphis (the 19th and obvious to me) and others including this one, the 38th, are not.  (I ignored Phoenix since that can also be a mythical being and is probably the main use for that name, so Phoenix, Arizona is necessary for that one.)  But yes, I was about to make a move request earlier and saw the one above, so backed out of it and am waiting.  CycloneGU (talk) 01:19, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: a request was made to change the name via speedy deletion of the redirect. I have declined to do so, as I see  the discussion on it here  was closed as non-consensus. I would regard further such attempts as disruptive.  DGG ( talk ) 19:48, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oh, Come On Guys 

message: I don't think that the picture labeled "I Street Bridge" is the I Street Bridge. I think that it is the Tower Bridge. Can anyone confirm that the picture/information is correct?Toyz1988 (talk) 16:23, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: You're quite right (the I Street Bridge is rather ugly and old). I reverted an IP or some other newbie recently when they tried to change the filename to a redlink on this article. I understand now that they were trying to reveal that the picture wasn't what it was as labeled. I've moved the file on Commons and changed the image description page as well. Should be sorted now. Killiondude (talk) 07:07, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, I doubt that I could have done all that myself.Toyz1988 (talk) 18:12, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  I Street Bridge? 

message: I believe mentioning Jedediah Smith's California explorations would be appropriate for this article. Cmguy777 (talk) 22:12, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: He was in the news recently because the school named after him is considering ditching the connection to him for his bad acts. Same here? CampKohler (talk) 05:12, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jedediah Smith 

message: Why doesn't the museum section mention the Aerospace Museum of California? CampKohler (talk) 05:12, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps because it's not within Sacramento? -skew-t (talk) 08:41, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aerospace Museum of California 

message: The "sister cities" claims that Bethlehem is part of Israel. Bethlehem is in the central West Bank; not even official Israeli policy claims it as part of their national territory. To do so is highly POV.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.248.189.169 (talk) 04:15, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I reverted without looking to see what Bethlehem's status is. This backs up what you're saying so your change is fine. My apologies for not looking more carefully. Killiondude (talk) 23:52, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bethlehem, Israel? 

message: makes wikipedia look bad because it shows the usual leftist slant.  embarrassing.  107.43.42.62 (talk) 08:15, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  unnecessary cheering for the Sacramento Bee 

message: does anybody know if the bus actually goes to Sacramento and what the schedule is?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.198.65.35 (talk) 17:15, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Would recommend checking Megabus website for that. -skew-t (talk) 08:41, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  mega bus schedule 

message: Nothing is listed for the airport...Milspecsim (talk) 23:40, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a mention in the transportation section. Feel free to expand it. -skew-t (talk) 08:41, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Airport Information? 

message: This article says there are 15 city council districts, but that there are only eight city council members. Huh? 99.63.160.171 (talk) 01:29, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Local government structure 

message: The three articles: List of Sacramento writers, List of Sacramento sports figures, and List of Sacramento entertainers are excessive, especially when New York and San Francisco only have one article (List of people from New York City and List of people from San Francisco). The three articles have been merged into one article, List of people from Sacramento.
:If someone could help clean it up and organize it for accuracy with properly cited sources, that'd be appreciated.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cheezesatzu (talk • contribs) 19:41, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging excessive notable people articles 

message: I challenge the inclusion of Drexel University into the introduction of the city of Sacramento on Wikipedia. This entity is not an historical aspect of the city, nor is it a foundational economic, cultural, social, physical or religious base of the city.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:9:7B80:125:5558:5413:52BF:7A94 (talk) 08:37, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Drexel University in the Introduction? 

message: Bold text  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:C:A380:763:24A7:6341:F652:2212 (talk) 01:47, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  oyc.yale.edu/ 

message: Hi.  I'm going through all the US Cities (as per List of United States cities by population) in an effort to provide some uniformity in structure.  Anyone have an issue with me restructuring this article as per Wikipedia:WikiProject Cities/US Guideline.  I won't be changing any content, merely the order.  Occasionally, I will also move a picture just to clean up spacing issues.  I've already gone through the top 20 or so on the above list, if you'd like to see how they turned out.  Thoughts?  Onel5969 (talk) 16:03, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Structure 

message: * Is Sacramento, California the dominant meaning of the name "Sacramento"? If not, move Sacramento (disambiguation) to Sacramento. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:52, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move? (11 January 2015) 

message: What is missing from the recently created city timeline article? Please add relevant content. Contributions welcome. Thank you. -- M2545 (talk) 16:12, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Timeline of Sacramento, California]] 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Sacramento, California. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20150203133727/http://www.cityofsacramento.org/ns/nadb/nad.cfm?areaid=2 to http://www.cityofsacramento.org/ns/nadb/nad.cfm?areaid=2
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20150203065022/http://www.cityofsacramento.org/ns/nadb/nad.cfm?areaid=3 to http://www.cityofsacramento.org/ns/nadb/nad.cfm?areaid=3
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20150203103325/http://www.cityofsacramento.org/ns/nadb/nad.cfm?areaid=4 to http://www.cityofsacramento.org/ns/nadb/nad.cfm?areaid=4
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20150206151348/http://www.gsm.ucdavis.edu/ExploreOurSchool/index.aspx?id=182&m2=244&m3=4&m1=94 to http://www.gsm.ucdavis.edu/ExploreOurSchool/index.aspx?id=182&m2=244&m3=4&m1=94
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20131115165124/http://www.usfca.edu/acadserv/academic/regions/sac/index.html to http://www.usfca.edu/acadserv/academic/regions/sac/index.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20150201114157/http://www.amtrakcapitols.com/included/docs/ccjpa/businessplan_0704.pdf to http://www.amtrakcapitols.com/included/docs/ccjpa/businessplan_0704.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:26, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified