Talk:Khukhrain

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: urlhttp://www.khukhrains.com. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 01:19, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The page has been attacked again with multiple copyright violations from http://www.khukhrains.com, the page has been again rolled back, and semi protected. The site owner has had to bring this to our attention again - I would not like to see him having to do that again. Therefore please keep to text that does not violate the copyright of others. If we have to roll back agin, then we may have to resort to full protection - where only admins can change the page.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:40, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: The Panjab Past and Present is a journal. We don;t have enough information in the citations to determine which issue/article etc is being referred to. I'd be grateful if someone could resolve that and I'd be even more grateful if someone could get me a copy of the article because some of what we say sounds distinctly dodgy to me. This article was full of original research, synthesis and puffery - it simply isn't good enough: better to say nothing at all than to pander to casteist fantasies. - Sitush (talk) 21:46, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Panjab Past and Present 

message: Gurinder pal singh sandhu (talk) 09:56, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  Request not made in "please change X to Y" format.  -- haminoon (talk) 10:35, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 25 March 2015 

message: Following Punjabi Khatri surnames are identified as the original Khukhrain clan. 
Anand, Suri, Chadha, Bhasin, Kohli, Sethi, Sahni and Sabharwal
Anand, Bhasin and Kohli have maintained their original Gotra (And you can provide a link to the Gotra in Wikepedia) as Kashyap whereas Suri changed to Bhargav, Chadha & Sahni changed to Virvans, Sethi changed to Pulast and Sabharwal changed to Hans ANILANAND (talk) 08:44, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: --Please provide reliable sources supporting your inclusion/alteration.Also, Wikipedia doesn't cite Wikipedia.See WP:CIRCULAR.Light❯❯❯ Saber 10:24, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 15 December 2016 

message: Khukhrain ( खुखरायण ) Khatris initially consisted eight clans : Anand, Bhasin, Chadha, Kohli, Sabharwal, Sahni, Sethi and Suri. Chandhok clan is derived from Chadha. During mid of 20th century before partition and is largely acceptable in the community (biradri) Jatin2312 (talk) 08:57, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. JTP (talk • contribs) 15:18, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

text: Not done: No actionable request. Spintendo      14:50, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 15 October 2017 

message: As the cited source mentions, the relevant claims regarding Khokhrains & Khokhars are based on the quotes from the autobiography of I.P. Anand, namely Crusader’s Century: In Pursuit of Ethical Values. But I.P. Anand was a businessman, not a historian. He also worked for ILO. In fact, he was just a graduate in Economics, as mentioned in his obituary by the ILO. So, his autobiography doesn't meet WP:HISTRS standards, thereby can't be cited here. - NitinMlk (talk) 22:04, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  I.P. Anand's autobiography as a source 

message: Anand (Khukhrain) (kshatriya) surname is from family surname of king of lahore K.A.A.G.K (talk) 20:15, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anand surname of royal kingdom of lahore 

message: Please add:
Khukhrains were ‘munshi’ to the Sukkarchakkia ‘misl’ of Maharaja Ranjit Singh, and a Khukhrain 'munshi', Sohan Lal Suri, was in the pay of British East India Company, even after the annexation of Punjab by the British. Sohan Lal Suri provided intelligence about the inner workings of the Sikh Empire to the British, greatly helping their cause.
Reference:  https://www.dawn.com/news/1056656 Pskak (talk) 01:57, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Unclear where the supplied text should be added. GiovanniSidwell (talk) 23:18, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 9 February 2023