lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Silesaurus

message: A new study published by Sterling Nesbitt, Randall Irmis, and Steve Parker in 2005 shows Silesaurus to be related to be Eucoelophysis, originally classified as a relative of Coelophysis. This would mean that Silesaurus and Eucoelophysis will be assigned to Dinosauria incertae sedis, but they are probably basal plant-eating dinosaurs, once again reviving Phytodinosauria, as suggested by Dzik (2003).
Dzik, J. 2003. A beaked herbivorous archosaur with dinosaur affinities from the early Late Triassic of Poland. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 23(3):556-574. 
R. B. Irmis, S. J. Nesbitt, and W. G. Parker, 2005. A critical review of the Triassic North American dinosaur record. In A. W. A. Kellner, D. D. R. Henriques, & T. Rodrigues (eds.), II Congresso Latino-Americano de Paleontologia de Vertebrados, Boletim de Resumos. Museum Nacional/UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro 139. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.194.116.63 (talk) 02:54, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, this situation would revive the concept, but not the name Phytodinosauria. Almost all current definitions have Dinosauria in a node-stem triplet, where Saurischia = "closer to birds than to Triceratops" and Ornithiscia = "closer to Triceratops than to birds". If sauropodomorphs and ornithischians form a group exclusive of saurischians, this would simply force Sauropodomorpha into Ornithischia, and Saurischia would become synonymous with Theropoda (which is defined as "closer to birds than to sauropods"). It would also probably have the effect of dragging a few "lagosuchians" into Saurischia, and vindicating the 1980s versions of Bob Bakker and Greg Paul ;)Dinoguy2 04:14, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phylogeny of Silesaurus 

message: Silesaurus was recovered by Ezcurra (2006) in a position next to a clade containing Eucoelophysis and Dinosauria. This analysis shows that Eucoelophysis and Silesaurus are pre-dinosaur ornithodirans. This analysis unveils the early evolution of dinosaurs and their relatives. Therefore, the Silesaurus page is to be updated.
Ezcurra, M. D., 2006, A review of the systematic position of the dinosauriform archosaur Eucoelophysis baldwini Sullivan & Lucas, 1999 from the Upper Triassic of New Mexico: Geodiversitas, v. 28, n. 4, p. 649-684. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.194.116.63 (talk) 01:51, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Silesaurus, a dinosaur-like predentate
Talk:Solaris Multiplexed I/O

message: As best as I can tell, MPxIO is uniformly referred to as "multipathing" rather than "multiplexed".  see the solaris scsi_vhci(7D) man page.
This page should be renamed to "Solaris I/O Multipathing".  --Sommerfeld 15:54, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page is misnamed
Talk:Carl Feynman

message: According to the linked discussion, which is from 2006, the consensus was to keep. Restoring article per linked discussion and consensus to keep, but look forward to link to correct discussion if above link is in error. --Zippy (talk) 08:30, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: On review of edit history of article, found correct discussion link. Consensus was to merge. I find under current notability guidelines no reason to dissent. --Zippy (talk) 08:36, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Can AfD closers please finish the paperwork correctly. Thanks. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:58, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
Category talk:Java (programming language)

message: Why is this category a sub-category of "Imperative programming languages"? I think Java is not an imperative programming language but declarative. If true, we should remove the category listing from this page. -- Sudarshanhs 15:57, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Java is an imperative language, and since Java is listed as an imperative language in the article you reference I think there's not a lot of argument on this point. —Doug Bell talk•contrib 17:34, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Pseudolagosuchus

message: These two names have been tentatively considered separate for a while due to absence of clear evidence towards their synonymy. However, now we know of a specimen (CRILAR-Pv 552) which demonstrates that the two represent the same animal. There isn't really a synonymy debate like, say, Torosaurus and Triceratops, so I'm proposing a merger between this page and Lewisuchus. We don't need two pages of the exact same taxon. Fanboyphilosopher (talk) 00:02, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Rather than directly stating that the two were not synonyms, Bittencourt et al. (2014) said "the available information from the material attributed to any of these taxa is not enough for a formal synonymization between them". They weren't necessarily opposed to the idea that they were synonyms, they just recognized that at the time there just wasn't enough overlapping material to compare or contrast the two to determine whether they were synonyms or not. That was written prior to the description of CRILAR-Pv 552, which possesses the combination of features considered diagnostic for Pseudolagosuchus along with those diagnostic for Lewisuchus. It's the overlapping material that Bittencourt et al. needed, and I doubt that they'd be opposed to synonymy at this point. The second author, Andrea Arcucci, named Pseudolagosuchus and even she has wanted to synonymize them in the past. Fanboyphilosopher (talk) 01:06, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger with ''Lewisuchus''
Talk:Alum Creek, West Virginia

message: Looking at the file POP_PLACES_DECI.TXT from the U.S. Census, updated 7 June 2005, Alum Creek is listed as being in Kanawha County, West Virginia. That article indicates that only part of the community is in Kanawha; Rambot thinks it is in Lincoln County, West Virginia.  Presumably is it split between the two, so I changed the article to indicate that. -- Beland 16:01, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: County
Talk:Ardbeg distillery

message: Who's this Nanny Hoople? No other references to be found on the Web.AdeMiami 17:00, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nanny Hoople????

message: It is stated in the article: "Ardbeg whisky is considered to be amongst the peatiest in the world, and certainly the core expression, Ardbeg 10 Year Old, is the peatiest standard expression from any whisky distillery with phenol content of 24ppm"
However, from the website of the owner of Lagavulin [found at http://www.malts.com/index.php/en_can/Choosing-Whisky/A-simple-guide-to-the-world-of-whisky/Whisky-Jargon/(offset)/1927]: "PPM The abbreviation of Parts Per Million – the scientific measurement for showing the amount of phenols present in a whisky, that have been absorbed from the burning of peat. For example, Lagavulin has 45 PPM, Talisker 35 PPM, Oban 15 PPM, Singleton of Dufftown 2 PPM and Cardhu 0 PPM." - now I'm not sure which expression of Talisker they are referring to, but Lagavulin only has one expression, the 16 year old, making Lagavulin a peatier standard expression than Ardbeg.
Looking at the reference for the "peatiest standard expression...phenol content of 24ppm" all I could find was the 24 ppm, not any claim that Ardbeg 10 is the peatiest standard expression, so I am going to remove this claim from the article, as it is not supported in any way I can see. If anyone has information supporting this claim, they can put it back in with the proper reference.
Ducian (talk) 15:32, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peat Content
Talk:The 'Nam

message: In an interview in Marvel Age, Murray said that they would not do six months on the Tet Offensive, but they did do a two-parter #24-25, and a fourter parter after left in #79-83 on the Tet Offensive-so they did end up doing six months.
Enda80 16:03, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Irony

message: Wasn't there a spinoff 'Nam comic or magazine, in black and white?  207.31.229.4 21:22, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spinoff Magazine?
Talk:Bruce Bennett

message: This didn't make much sense.  I can't find Carlton KaDell.  Anyway, ther's no orderly succession.  Johnny Weissmuller played Tarzan from 1932 to 1948; during that period, several other actors played Tarzan as well.--Runcorn 19:12, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: My point is that there is no sense in which one actor succeded another; there were several overlapping actors.  This is not the sort of circumstances in which a succession box is appropriate.  It would be more sensible to refer to a list of actors who have played Tarzan, where the dates could be displayed.  Obviously, you are at liberty to restore it, if you really want to.  What higher ruling did you have in mind?--Runcorn 17:25, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Succession box 

message: I removed this note from the article, as it suggests the info contained in the article is correct:
:NB: Standard works of reference such as Halliwell's "Who's Who in the Movies" and Katz's "Encyclopedia of Film" give his date of birth as 1909 (or 19th May 1909) but the IMDB (link below) has 1906, and this date is confirmed by the 1920 and 1930 U.S. Census records.
--Evb-wiki 16:42, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I restored it - I see no point in deleting it.--Runcorn 20:45, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Wikipedia works on the principle that you quote what is verifiable, not what is true.  1906 seems the best-attested date, but since there are good sources that say 1909, we should note that.  I'm afraid that what his son says is irrelevant, unless he said it somewhere that passes WP:RS!--Runcorn 23:43, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of birth

message: I am sad to report that Herman died on February 25, 2007.  I am happy that I got to meet him once--he was a very nice man with great stories.  Rest in Peace, Uncle Herm! Seanlee19699 17:14, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bruce/Herman death date addition

message: SirRhosis: As I received the news through family channels just yesterday, there is probably not an official announcement or obituary yet.  Herman was my great uncle.  S. SLD 02:54, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Here's a sufficient article:  Canadian Paul 07:39, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Re: Death date

message: I too am a grand-niece, and my siblings and I all relished being related to him.  Talk about a life well lived and a role model!  He was a wonderful man.209.172.113.146 21:22, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: ==========
Talk:Pompeo Coppini

message: I have moved an extended list of Coppini's works into the Infobox.  The photographs remain in the main section.  Maile66 (talk) 10:35, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Coppini Works

message: I created George Washington (Coppini) not realizing there were three distinct sculptures depicting Washington by Coppini. I am not sure if further disambiguation is needed until articles are created for the other two versions or not (1926, the year it was designed? 1927, the year it was dedicated?). ---Another Believer (Talk) 23:24, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved to George Washington (Coppini, 1926), at least for now. ---Another Believer (Talk) 23:46, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  I believe that it is more typical to date a sculpture from the dedication date. Carptrash (talk) 07:12, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  Ok. ---Another Believer (Talk) 17:26, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

text:  Page moved to George Washington (Coppini, 1927). ---Another Believer (Talk) 17:33, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  George Washington (Coppini) 
Talk:1999 Atlanta day trading firm shootings

message: This is more like a question:
I need to know about more of his life?
Like what did he do and how did he get into that particument 
thank you very much 
first time reader
Does anyone know where Mark Barton is buried?  I would like to see it.
So...13 victims in all? 16? Why no total?131.96.70.164 09:29, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: After the quote "I hope this doesn't ruin your trading day" someone added:
This statement is actually attributed to one of the survivors being interviewed at the scene by an Atlanta police officer.
I removed this for at least two reasons.  The foremost is its ambiguity: does this comment mean the statement was actually made by a survivor, or does it mean the statement, was related by a survivor who said he heard Barton say it?  Then: if the former, this contradicts all the news articles I found when I googled the phrase in question, which all attribute it to Barton.  If the latter, I'm not sure that's noteworthy.
In any event, if there is doubt whether Barton said this, that should be noted more clearly (and cited), or the quote should be removed.  A cite for the quote would be useful, too, admittedly, but I've really delved into this more than I'd planned to already...--NapoliRoma 00:07, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed apparent editorial comment 

message: I'm a little confused.  The date of his death is listed as July 29th,  but the events for the month of July, 1999, show the actual incident as occurring 2 days later, on July 31st.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1999#July
What is the correct date for the incident?
DigitalGuy 10:50, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct Date Conflict 

message: Figured that i'd change the title of the article to represent the event itself much like other mass shootings on Wikipedia.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Graylandertagger (talk • contribs) 00:31, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Changing to the title of this article.
Talk:Pete Coors

message: This page has more financial data about the man than a bio. And much of the financial data seems irrelevant to not only Pete Coors himself, but his Senate campaign as well. Was this just copied over from some other site and left to Wikirot?
* Reading this article you would think that this "entrepreneur" was a self-made man... Since when is inherited money, entrepreneurial? Stevenmitchell (talk) 08:25, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Core topics/Supplement

message: Martin, I think we're in alignment at least in principle. I think the "current events" should generally be one of the last steps, essentially to ensure that they are still current. Working it through a section somehow could be one good option. Maurreen 03:14, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As before, I think The Beatles should be on the list. They're surely as important as Beethoven, and it would help balance the US-centric nature of the list so far (baseball? American football? yuk! :P) --kingboyk 14:43, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

text: This list definitely needs to be made less US-centric. Watch37264 22:32, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  This list will probably be heavily used for the next release version, so we should get it right.  I'm a Brit, living in America, so I can see different sides and try to be a bit more impartial.  Now, I'm just going to add in all the players of Newcastle United....! Walkerma 17:25, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Current issues and people

message: I find it particularly odd that hydrogen is listed as a supplemental core but periodic table is not. A well-developed article on the periodic table would describe periodic trends, discovery of the elements, development of the table and other particularly vital information. While hydrogen is just about that element. Does anybody object to me swapping the two on this list? --mav (talk) 22:40, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you could make a strong case for having both here.  If no one else objects, go ahead and add Periodic table to the list.  Hydrogen is the simplest atom, and the basic stuff of most of the universe (in atomic or molecular form), so it's pretty important, but periodic table is very important too.  Note that chemical element is listed at WP:CORE.  Now we have the selection bot, though, a list like this is now much less critical to our mission. Thanks, Walkerma (talk) 00:14, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done - we also might want to increase the total allowed for this list to 300. --mav (talk) 02:47, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hydrogen vs periodic table
Talk:Gluten-free beer

message: --68.40.223.65 (talk) 20:15, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where to find Gluten free beer in Michigan stores, such as Kroger? 

message: :Gluten-free beer is beer made from ingredients that do not contain glycoproteins (gluten).
Correct me if I am wrong, but I don't believe that all glycoproteins are gluten, and a plant completely without glycoproteins seems unlikely.  Or am I missing something. WormRunner (talk) 02:51, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  without glycoproteins?
Talk:Yzma

message: thank you for adding references, per request. Kukini 16:45, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

message: The IPA was ambiguous. I couldn't tell if the Yz is supposed to be pronounced like ease or like is. kwami (talk) 21:38, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  pronunciation
Talk:U.S. Route 24 in Illinois

message: I put the Merge template on this article because the main article on U.S. Route 24 isn't that big, and this article isn't that long.  -- Grev 16:49, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm going to change it to Expand; consider this a part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Illinois State Routes It's also a stub for now. The article will contain a structure similar to what's on the IL State Routes Wikiproject, and enough content exists. —Rob (talk) 18:47, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with the main article
Talk:Lactam

message: The wife is allergic to all lactose....Is there any relationship between lactone and lactose ?? 
:Wikipedia is not a suitable platform for health related questions better try somewhere else for an answer........ V8rik 17:57, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A good quality image is needed for α-lactam, drawn using ChemDraw, ChemSketch, or other molecular drawing software.
The image should preferably be an SVG. — CrafterNova [ TALK ] [ CONT ] 16:56, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image needed for α-lactam
Talk:Composition studies

message: Composition textbooks of circa 1900 do roughly what we now do in first-year courses, though these books were for 8th graders; they also do not generally distinguish between literary composition and other forms of writing, because the essay was still considered a literary genre.  It is, therefore, necessary to tell the story of the history of composition as a distinct field.  Where did it come from?  Why is it taking over English departments?  In this tale, one could include the ways in which composition courses have appropriated rhetoric from speech, communication, and philosophy departments.  Also notable would be those who wish to "abolish" composition altogether.  This story should probably include high school writing instruction and the advent of the Advanced Placement exam in composition, which compliments the AP exam in literature. Josh a brewer (talk) 17:37, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  History and Rhetoric 

message: — Assignment last updated by Kaywoodard (talk) 16:17, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: English 102 - Freshmen Composition Semester Two
Talk:Windbreaker

message: no Mahmoud reference? --AnY FOUR! 20:04, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

message: I'm a UK resident and I don't think I've ever heard the phrase "windcheater", we'd more likely call them an "Anorak" "waterproof" or just 'coat'. --Frog (talk) 16:36, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomenclature
Talk:Claude Dornier

message: "The Dornier company now also makes medical equipment" There is no such thing anymore like "Dornier Werke". Since some 15 years. Congratulation to this masterpiece of research.... <eg>
The article should be re-named into "Claude Dornier", his official christian name, even if Claude may have been called "Claudius".
This is to avoid confusion with his eldest son, Claudius Dornier (1914 - 1986), who constructed the amphibious plane "Seastar" and who is the father of Conrado Dornier.--82.64.58.38 (talk) 22:47, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This is even more confusing as the son is not all that well known and doesn't have his own page (being responsible for just 2 aircraft, one updated from his father's designs, and 1 new, both of which have thus far been unsuccessful at gaining sufficient orders for production), but the father is, and every source I have seen used Claudius. A disambiguation page might have been more appropriate especially as Claudius Dornier points here anyway.NiD.29 (talk) 10:18, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Everybody Loves a Lover

message: I heard a song on Cablevision's Golden Oldies music channel by Barbara George called "I Know (He Don't Love Me No More)" and the music, especially the intro, is similar if not exactly the same as this song's.  I couldn't find any information on how they might be connected. Bebing 17:16, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Song Similarities
Talk:Blaine, Minnesota

message: For those who plan on editing and expanding this article, please follow the Template for a U.S. City. Thanks!--Daveswagon 09:55, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Template for a U.S. City
Talk:Chief (heraldry)

message: I haven't noticed chiefs of allegiance in German armory.  Example?  —Tamfang 17:15, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: They occur in civic heraldry,not personal, which is why you may not have seen them. --EncycloPetey 23:22, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  chiefs of allegiance 

message: Is a base the equivalent of a chief except at the bottom? Is such a thing allowed in traditional heraldry?
199.173.225.33 (talk) 14:13, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, in terms of its appearance, although they are not generally used as a mark for difference the way a chief is.  There are many examples of the base in medieval rolls of arms from across Europe. --EncycloPetey (talk) 16:00, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  base 

message: : In some medieval and Renaissance  drawings of coats of arms, the chief is drawn even deeper, so that it fills almost all the top half of the shield. In some cases, it is drawn so wide that it will look as though the shield is divided party per fess.
This is rather common in Italy; at least, I've seen a lot of Italian coats with oversized Ghibelline chiefs. Dunno if this is worth mentioning. —Tamfang (talk) 07:10, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  heap big chief
Talk:SuperPretzel

message: This article was the subject of an afd debate closed on 19 May 2006.  The result was Keep. Xoloz 17:22, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: AfD result
Help talk:How to use Cite.php references

message: :Note: AN3/ANI #1 corresponds to 16 above.
 Reversion counters
19: w:H:F rv Francis Schonken  	22: w:H:F rvv Omniplex   (= AN3/ANI #2)
20: w:How rv Francis Schonken  	23: w:How rv  Omniplex
24: w:How rv Francis Schonken  	26: w:H:F rv  Omniplex   (= AN3/ANI #3)
25: w:H:F rv Francis Schonken  	27: w:How Mfd Omniplex
29: w:H:F rv Francis Schonken  	30: w:H:F rv  Omniplex   (= AN3/ANI #4)
:Copied / moved from User talk:Omninplex:
	You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule on Help:Footnotes. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.
  Stifle (talk) 19:02, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You are welcome to copy the exact wikitext from the master page at Meta and paste it into this page at any time. To change this edit Template:H:f Help, maybe also edit Help:Help and m:Help:MediaWiki help policy - ignore the word "policy", it's not the same as in say WP:3RR. -- Omniplex 14:14, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

text: I don't see anything exempting this from the 3RR. If you can find something, please let me know. Stifle (talk) 22:43, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:3RR]]