lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Space policy of the George W. Bush administration

message: It doesn't seem like an article with this title (U.S. National Space Policy) can be anywhere near complete if it only covers current policy. Said another way, this article desperately needs a history section! (Sdsds - Talk) 06:28, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: This is copied verbatim from the gov doc of the same name 173.22.123.35 (talk) 17:20, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copying 

message: I have moved this article from U.S. National Space Policy to Space policy of the United States, as that is a more standard title.  I'd like to expand it to talk about US space policy in general, rather than the 2006 Bush space policy which it currently focuses on exclusively.  Antony–22 (talk⁄contribs) 04:16, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move 

message: This article cites The Washington Post eleven times, but does not have any information about what article or articles are being referred to...  Does anyone have any idea what the referenced articles are?  Antony–22 (talk⁄contribs) 03:16, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Washington Post refs 

message: I moved the article to a name that more accurately reflects the policy formation process in the US (i.e. does not assert that the president sets the policy), as well as one that closely matches the main article format wise. Vietminh (talk) 17:47, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I have responded at Talk:Space policy of the Barack Obama administration.  Antony–22 (talk⁄contribs) 18:08, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved article 

message: In February 2006, the phrase "to understand and protect the home planet" was quietly removed from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)'s official mission statement. http://www.ucsusa.org/our-work/center-science-and-democracy/promoting-scientific-integrity/at-nasa-earth-is-removed.html#.VbAAXbwSVhE 
This has always been one of the most noted, visible, and lasting changes that American's note of Bush's administration. Within America, the military/international "controversy" never was noted, didn't have an impression- the USA changing it's exploration agency's mission statement away from exploring the earth was noted, clear, and indicative of the lack of environmental concern and regard for science of the administration at the time. I would like to see this controversy not just noted on the page, but put up as the chief controversy, as the primary change in mission statement, which policy then stems from. --Rektide (talk) 20:49, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "To understand and protect the home planet" Controversy
Talk:George Washington Lambert

message: Removed some of the pictures, per, but not each and every one, some was kept that were added, as a compromise, and also made the galleries smaler too.   One can't show everything in the article. Hafspajen (talk) 18:06, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  . 
Talk:The Kiss (Hayez)

message: From the text of the first paragraph:
In the left part of the canvas shadowy forms lurk in the corner to give an impression of conspiracy and danger.
First of all there appears only to be one "shadowy form".  And I'm not an expert on art, but it seems to me that the "shadowy form" is not "lurking", as it is obviously facing away from the couple and appears to be leaving the scene.  The above quoted sentence in the article seems to indicate the shadowy form is the painting's equivalent of ominous music, and I don't buy that.  The scene is too dynamic.  I can buy the "conspiracy and danger", if you think of the shadowy form having just had a meeting with the man wherein the man was tasked with a mission that he is now departing on.
Perhaps someone more of an expert can go over this and tweak it, hopefully with citations to something authoritative.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kfitzner (talk • contribs) 11:16, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shadowy Form 

message: The date of the painting is 1859, and the foundation of the Austro-Hungarian Empire is 1867, so the following phrase cannot be true, as the painting pre-dates the foundation of the empire.
"The man wears red, white and green, representing the Italian patriots fighting for independence from the Austro-Hungarian empire."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.225.83.74 (talk) 08:15, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Color symbolism
Talk:Defective interfering particle

message: von Magnus is the most cited author as being responsible for the observation of interference but in reality the first observations about viral interference were done by Leslie Chambers and Werner and Gertrude Henle in 1942 and 1943. In fact, von Magnus' first publication in 1947, a preliminary paper (https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/full/10.5555/19492701629), cites both papers (https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.77.3.251 and https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.98.2534.87.b) and confirms and extends their observations using PR8. Even the term interference was used by Henle first. Hrodrik (talk) 11:06, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  First observation nitpick
Talk:Matthew Booth (soccer)

message: shows No appearance data available for his time at Wimbledon. This actually means that he didn't play a match for them. All Wimbledon games from at 1992 have records in the soccerbase db.  slυмgυм [ ←→ ] 20:44, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wimbledon 0 (0) 

message: The page states he has 31 goals in 37 appearances for the South African National Team. Surely this can't be correct? Drsmith9 (talk) 20:02, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: International Goals?
Talk:The Birth of Venus (Cabanel)

message: Reworking of the famous Pompeiian fresco: too obvious to mention, or "Orginal Research"? So often the same thing... --Wetman 07:31, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The French version has some pithy descriptions of this work, whose notoriety seems to have passed Wikipedians by, unnoticed.--05:17, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
Talk:UFO (Sneaky Sound System song)

message: It should probably be noted that UFO is really their breakthrough track on the Australian cultural scene over all.  There's not a club in Sydney city proper you can escape this track at present.  Ratings aside, it's inescapable.  :P  Jachin 06:35, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Relevance
Talk:Antibody-dependent enhancement

message: It seems like the responses to the first RSV vaccines could be ADE.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Respiratory_syncytial_virus_vaccine
How much clarity about that would be required before it could be included here?
222.152.28.14 (talk) 07:42, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  RSV 

message: This following sentence in italics from the current version online needs a capital "A" if it is to remain. However, this study of Cleveland Clinic health care workers from February 2022, makes the information below outdated (although technically correct, since the date below is before this study). 
I believe it is better to delete the inaccurate information. However I am NOT suggesting to replace it with the study information, as more studies would provide further clarification. 
Please delete this sentence or fix the starting "a" to "A":
as of 27 January 2022, there have been no observed incidents with vaccines for COVID-19 in trials with nonhuman primates, in clinical trials with humans, or following the widespread use of approved vaccines.
An alternative approach, for those concerned about ADE would be to explain why the 2023 XBB vaccines are monovalent-only - and therefore safer in the context of ADE. The strategy behind eliminating earlier strains is to prevent the possibility of ADE by not including off-target non-neutralizing antibodies from earlier strains - based on that Cleveland Clinic study data above, as well as others. 
Perhaps a better second sentence is:
The updated 2023 monovalent COVID vaccines produce antibodies specific to the current XBB variants. Vaccines targeting only the currently circulating variants would minimize the hypothetical risk of ADE by excluding off-target antibodies from prior strains.  LauraWalton (talk) 01:42, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Punctuation and accuracy suggestions for COVID-19 section
Talk:Gary Ballance

message: Reverted the last edits because they are irrelevant to the article's long term future. The retard editing this page is making edits almost on a ball-by-ball basis. Perhaps he is on coke?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.114.234.231 (talk) 02:19, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

message: At this moment in time Balance is only guilty of using a racist term in a joking fashion as part of team banter with another colleague who at the time was his best friend - and this person also verbally abused him in a similarly joking manner. You current description is misleading at best. 5.81.63.161 (talk) 15:21, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 15:26, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 4 November 2021 

message: Is there a reason why there isn't a designated section about this on Ballance's page? MaskedSinger (talk) 18:52, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Racism at YCCC
Talk:Viral pneumonia

message: Dude, can you stop with the edit warring + the misinformation about prolonged mask use causes viral pneumonia. You need to cite a source why prolonged mask use causes pneumonia.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaseng55 (talk • contribs) 02:35, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit warring 

message: The statement that viral pneumonia is more common than bacterial pneumonia in children is directly contradicted by the main article for pneumonia, which says that only 15% of pneumonia is viral for children but up to half for adults. 2A02:C7C:6535:D100:F010:CF0C:18E3:EFE (talk) 15:33, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adults vs children
Talk:Lyssavirus

message: There are more of them.
Phylogroup 1
IRKV(+Ozernoe) - Irkut
DUVV - Duvenhage
EBLv1 - Eurobpean Bat lyssavirus 1
ABLV - Australian bat lyssavirus
RABV - Rabbies bat virus
KHUV - Khujand virus
EBLV2 - European bat lyssavirus 2
ARAV - Aravan virus
Phylogroup 2
WCBV - West caucassian bat virus
SHIBV - Shimoni bat virus
MOKV - Mokola Virus
LBV - Lagos bat virus  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.176.188.214 (talk) 09:57, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

message: It seems that article is small with history, victims, symptoms, similairity to rabids and information. I cannot do him because language is not english and mistaken words.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.70.80.179 (talk) 13:42, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. This article needs to be expanded to include societal impact. Unfortunately, my current effort only encompasses basic virology. Bervin61 (talk) 20:42, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expand the article 

message: This section is a bit of a mess. Zoonosis is infection of humans by non-human species. It is not a mode of transmission.
The sentence on transcription is poorly worded and not well-punctuated. The sentence on 'natural hosts' should be corrected. Vertebrates? Which non-mammalian vertebrates? Humans are not a natural host. Natural hosts are reservoirs for viruses; this does not apply to humans.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CCC7:E780:142C:7E07:A089:B114 (talk) 19:23, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Life cycle 
Talk:1932 Maccabiah Games

message: == Naming convention ==
Please see Talk:Maccabiah Games#Naming convention and reply in there --CyberXRef☎ 09:34, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: Please see Talk:Maccabiah Games#Naming convention and reply in there --CyberXRef☎ 09:34, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming convention 

message: I am trying to figure out exactly which countries participated. It appears like there are various accounts out there the popular numbers are 14 and 18, most of these accounts don't actually name them. I've found this which seems to be far more reliable than the new accounts from the Tel Aviv-Jaffa Municipal Historical Archives. (It's in Hebrew). They list 25 participating countries:
* Austria
* Australia
* Bulgaria
* Belgium
* Czechoslovakia	
* Denmark
* Free City of Danzig
* England
* Estonia
* Egypt	
* France
* Germany
* Greece
* Hungary
* Latvia	
* Lebanon
* Lithuania
* Netherlands
* Poland
* Romania	
* Syria
* Switzerland
* Tunisia
* United States
* Yugoslavia
--CyberXRef☎ 23:52, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Participating nations
Talk:1992 in association football

message: I removed "It's the most invaluable tragedy in French football.", because I did not understand it. I suspect that "It's the most lethal tragedy in French football".was means, but I can not be sure. Nothing of the sort is mentioned at Armand Césari Stadium disaster 
I also removed the following: *February 12 – Dutch club ADO Den Haag names Mark Wotte as their new manager, after having fired Co Adriaanse.
There must be several thousand proffesional football clubs in the world. This will mean many hundreds of manager changes a year. If we list them all it will clog up the article. Thehalfone 07:30, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:List of cheerleading stunts

message: Sorry. User:LBHS Cheerleader  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Barnstargurl (talk • contribs) 19:27, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism

message: * This article refers to "flyer" about 30 times without saying what a flyer is. Needs a first reference.148.75.167.151 (talk) 21:06, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Flyer

message: *No, it is a list, rather make a section in the cheerleading article about the tumbling/ stunting elements of cheerleading. Maddie was here 19:50, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: Should basket tosses be under the heading of dismounts? They're really a whole seperate thing, and this is reflected on score sheets Itsawayoflife 03:27, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Groupings

message: I have updated the article to reflect that a Cupie and an Awesome are the SAME stunt & cited the USASF Glossary as the source.  For those who are unaware, the USASF is the governing body for US Allstar cheerleading and the producer of the Cheerleading Worlds on ESPN.  I would consider them the MOST authoritative source for this information.  Please don't change this unless you can provide a more reliable source that states that these are indeed 2 different stunts. MsDivagin 13:16, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cupie/Awesome Debate

message: Show and Go should not be under the category of dismounts as it is not a way to return a flyer to the ground, but a separate stunt. Kirsten5400 (talk) 19:19, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Show and Go

message: Please do not change any of the information given in the athletes involved section. I don't know who tried to combine back spot and main base into back base(there is no such thing), but all that information was incorrect, and did not make sense. All the information given is sourced by the official rule-making body USASF (United States All-Star Federation.) Please do not change the terms to the ones you use at your gym, slang, or regional terms. The ones given are correct by USASF standards.
Correction: In the UK the back spot is also called the "back base" or just "back", but as this is slang rather than official terminology, should it be used? Sean 86.9.125.200 (talk) 11:01, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Correct Information/ Changing Information
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Steve Gilliard

message: "Non-notable blogger"? Give me a break. Aside from being one of the most popular bloggers on the internet, Gilliard was also one of the first "guest editors" at Daily Kos, and was responsible for building that site's traffic and establishing it as a legitimate "voice" in the then-emerging "blogosphere." Previous to that, he was was a recognized voice at Netslaves. I have absolutely no idea why his name is being "proposed for deletion" from Wikipedia. Will you be "deleting" other media figures, such as George Will or Maureen Dowd, when they die? Gilliard was a better writer than both of them put together.
-dave™©
In casting his vote, 68.36.78.211 (the unsigned commenter I marked) also deleted a dissenting "delete" vote.  I can't revert to the previous version because others have already cast votes since then which would be lost... and I'm not sure what the proper protocol is here regarding the reposting of deleted votes -- could someone more knowledgeable in Wikipedia policy address this?
--Viridian {Talk} 17:09, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Cricket in World War I

message: The Wisden obtuaries in the editions from 1915 to 1919 (and perhaps 1920 too) should be a good source of material. They're available online at Cricinfo for those that have a (free) Cricinfo username and password. JH (talk page) 22:12, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deaths section 
Talk:The White Birch (album)

message: How are Codeine supposedly an influence on Low (band) if Low formed a year before Codeine's The White Birch was released? 173.88.246.138 (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not unusual for bands to be influenced by others after they're formed, seems reasonable to me. Amkilpatrick (talk) 08:39, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Supposed influence on [[Low (band)]]
Talk:Echo and Narcissus (Waterhouse painting)

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that the featured picture :File:John William Waterhouse - Echo and Narcissus - Google Art Project.jpg, which is used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for June 7, 2020. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2020-06-07. Any improvements or maintenance to this article should be made before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:04, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:John William Waterhouse - Echo and Narcissus - Google Art Project.jpg]] scheduled for POTD
Talk:Blue Nude (Souvenir de Biskra)

message: I'm a bit confused. If this painting was burned in an effigy, how did it survive? 141.154.151.71 23:00, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In effigy means symbolically; not literally...Modernist (talk) 13:02, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:San Giorgio Maggiore at Dusk

message: The existence of related paintings is a bit confusing.  There probably needs to be an article on the Venice series as a whole with a link to this article.--Thoughtfortheday (talk) 12:41, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Series 

message: At the end of the Bosnan ersion of the movie, The Thomas Crown Affair, in the credits, it is stated that no particular museum is  represented (though exterior scenes might be the Met).Kdammers (talk) 03:53, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  thomascrown
Talk:Landscape Near Figueras

message: If the painting has moved to a museum from private hands, why does the right side bar say it is still in a private collection....I'd fix it, but there is also no source showing that it changed hands as such...00:33, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  If so 
Talk:The City Rises

message: Was there more than one Boccioni painting entitled "The City Rises"?  Were they both painted in 1910?
On the left is the graphic used in this article.  On the right is the graphic used in the article Futurism.
The basic layout is similar, but they clearly are not the same paintings. — Lawrence King (talk) 02:14, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multiple versions?
Talk:Quazatron

message: I'm pretty sure that the AB Andrewoid must be a a reference to Andrew Braybrook but obviously I can't put that in without it being original research. Anybody have a source for it? Marasmusine 13:13, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Mongolia

message: a  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Redder-7 (talk • contribs) 15:20, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

message: I suggest a reference to petroglyphs and megaliths in Mongolia. Some of them, in Altai,  have already been registered by UNESCO (https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1382/). More recently (1997), petroglyphs and megaliths have been discovered in Gobi desert (Bayan Ovoo): "Discovery of Prehistoric Ruins in Gobi Desert", by Gonzalo de Salazar Serantes, Adoranten 1998;  Tanum: Scandinavian Society for Prehistoric Art, 1998, pp 66-69).    Fred Harrington (talk) 12:11, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Petroglyphs and megaliths in Mongolia 

message: The ruling party has been in rule for over a century 125.254.16.103 (talk) 01:53, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should "dominant-party" be added to political system?
Talk:Awkward silence

message: I intend to replace the word choice in the quote from Pulp Fiction from "heck" to "fuck" in the interest of accurately quoting the movie. As per Wikipedia:Profanity. Jordan.Kreiger (talk) 05:09, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Profanity
Talk:St. Assam's Church

message: Excellent. Separate articles may be needed, as uses grow, and detail is expanded, and to avoid confusion. 217.118.66.36 15:15, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this really must be split - I will add it to my "to do" list... SeoR (talk) 14:32, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split 

message: With referencing could be C class. SeoR (talk) 17:10, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Referencing
Template talk:WTA

message: The URL of the WTA-profile for player was changed. Please modify the template. The following example shows a new link to the page for Shuai Zhang:
http://www.wtatennis.com/players/player//title/
Thank you --Dodi123 (talk) 09:51, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Could you make the requested changes at  first? --Nessie (talk) 15:44, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

text: This might be more challenging than it looks. Not only do we have to use firstname-lastname (and thus we need to swap the order for Chinese players), but if the WTA uses diatrics, we have to replace them with hyphens Carla Suárez Navarro; but if the WTA doesn't use diatrics, then we have to replace them with the plain letter instead. Anna Karolína Schmiedlová. Iffy★Chat -- 15:59, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  New URL for WTA-profile
Template talk:Billie Jean King Cup

message: I propose removing Chile, Chinese Taipei, Cuba, Greece, Latvia, Mexico, Norway, Paraguay, Peru, Portugal, South Korea, and Uruguay from the section of the template titled "Former World Group teams". These teams have never been in the World Group in the current format and have never advanced to the quarterfinals under the old format (which would be equivalent). If the criteria for inclusion is simply playing in the World Group in any format, then there are some unexplained absences in the list, e.g., Luxembourg, Philippines, Hong Kong, and Thailand. There needs to be some sort of consistent criteria to follow, assuming someone hasn't already established an unspoken one. Assuming there isn't a consensus against it, I will eventually make the change I proposed. —Hermionedidallthework (talk) 20:55, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Support If I am not mistaken, that is the criteria also being used for Template:Davis Cup. SOAD KoRn (talk) 21:49, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Support as above. C679 11:07, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

text: Comment: I accidentally left out Belarus as one of the teams to be removed. –Hermionedidallthework (talk) 15:36, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclusion/exclusion of certain former World Group teams 

message: * Current champions (2020–21 ):  
State UNAMBIGUOUSLY your suggested changes below this line, preferably in a "change RUS to RTF" format — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.215.10.18 (talk) 09:31, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 02:53, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 7 November 2021