Talk:New Jersey Route 440

message: Well this was hard to do, i can't decide between start or stub, but i'll suggest stub for now. Feel free to change it.Mitchazenia(7500+edits) 23:49, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: Doesn't the NJ Turnpike/Route 440 intersect in Bayonne? not Jersey City?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.115.61.185 (talk) 15:53, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Route 440/NJ Turnpike junction #2 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on New Jersey Route 440. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160313112746/http://jimmyandsharonwilliams.com/njroads/1920s/images/1927_routes.gif to http://www.jimmyandsharonwilliams.com/njroads/1920s/images/1927_routes.gif
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110628183145/http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/1953_New_Jersey_state_highway_renumbering to http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/1953_New_Jersey_state_highway_renumbering
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:00, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (February 2018) 

message: Seems like NJ-NY Route 440 should be one article rather than two separate articles. The NJ portion shows a discontinuous section that may be better merged with NY 440 article. Proposing that New Jersey Route 440 and New York State Route 440 be one continuous article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1002:b00d:c414:ada0:f00a:4dee:c4d1 (talk) 2021-05-14T12:42:27 (UTC)
*Oppose - The New Jersey Route 440 and New York State Route 440 articles each have enough content to sustain their own articles, despite the fact that NY 440 bridges the two sections of NJ 440. Dough4872 10:43, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger 15 May 2021 

message: where in the sources are you finding verification for all that? Horse Eye's Back (talk) 14:56, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The maps and the SLD verify the information in the route description. Read the source. Dough4872 14:59, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The sources says nothing about land use, where are finding "wooded surroundings" "passes near homes" " through more residential neighborhoods" " residential sections of the city" "passing through industrial areas" "passes between neighborhoods" "hairpin turn" "passing residences to the east" "heads into business sectors farther to the east" "heads past industrial establishments before running through commercial areas again" etc Horse Eye's Back (talk) 15:03, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Read the map. Just because it’s not in clear text doesn’t mean the source doesn’t verify the information. Reading a map is different than reading text. Dough4872 15:09, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Those are not land use maps, that information is literally not there to read. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 15:13, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Failed verification