Talk:Native Instruments

message: One thing that isn't mentioned in the article is that a large part of Reaktor's newer engine was developed by another company for a product called Sync Modular.  From what I understand Native Instruments bought out the company that made Sync Modular and eventually hired the lead developer of that product.  While I'm not certain, I believe it was between versions 2 and 3 when the Sync Modular code was incorporated.
The following is from the Sonic Spot: (http://www.sonicspot.com/news/00112901.html)
Dr Sync and Native Instruments start a collaboration to bring their experience and technologies together and develop new and innovative audio software.
Due to this reason the future development of SynC Modular is cancelled, except for the bugfixes. Also the amount of email support may be reduced.
As a compensation for the stopped development of SynC Modular, Dr Sync and Native Instruments are providing a copy of Reaktor 2.3 free of charge to users who have registered SynC Modular before November 30, 2000. Alternatively, qualifying users can wait for a free copy of a SynC Modular "compatible" Native Instruments program that may be released in the future.
Registration for SynC Modular will be open again in a few days. Dr Sync and Native Instruments are offering a $49 discount on Reaktor 2.3 to SynC Modular users who have registered after November 30, 2000.
See the SynC Modular web site for more details.
I used to be a user of Sync Modular and the engine was substantially more cpu efficient than the Reaktor engine at the time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.36.43.177 (talk) 16:09, 5 April 2006‎ (UTC)
:I agree with whoever posted Sync Modular comment. At present I am attempting to update Reaktor page with more verifiable information about the software. I thank you for the link, and I'll try to update NI page whenever I'll have the time. — TheEXIT 19:15, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sync Modular

message: Let me just vote against this. Traktor is substantial and pertinent enough to stand on its own. Dougieb 03:59, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Traktor merging into this article 

message: I feel this article reads too much like an advert. It has the same style as the Native Instruments adverts. I think this article leans too heavily on this article on their website: http://www.native-instruments.com/index.php?id=companyhistory_us. Imo this sentence overstates for instance: "His first idea was both a "new kind of instrument" and a software remake of an old 'cabinet-based' pure analog system. The vision, however, was remarkable". 
"The company's scope among music artists is diverse and substantial with accolades from users such as Kraftwerk, Trent Reznor and Hans Zimmer", what does it mean when those people are payed to say that which i suspect NI does for their adverts on which this sentence is based. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Biggiesmartypants (talk • contribs) 09:22, 14 March 2007‎ (UTC)
I agree - I have added a few fact tags and flagged the page. Sidasta 12:06, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  The artists are not "paid to say" that they use NI instruments. Trent Reznor doesn't need shill money and wouldn't say that he used their stuff when he didn't if they did offer. The fact is that if you know anything about virtual instruments, it is not inconceivable - and in fact is expected that artists of this calibur would be saying these things.Dougieb 02:21, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Native Instruments seem to be a monopolist. Excluding Traktor there is not a hell of a lot software that fight against. Thus it is a problem not to use NI products. -- 84.132.98.92 14:00, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  An advert 

message: :Image:NI Logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 23:12, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:NI Logo.jpg

message: :Image:NiOberbaumbruke.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 23:17, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:NiOberbaumbruke.jpg

message: "notable products"? Why?   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.32.92.140 (talk) 01:53, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: This is an ad

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Native Instruments. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110709161435/http://www.cnbcmagazine.com:80/story/berlins-new-techno-beat/1417/1/ to http://www.cnbcmagazine.com/story/berlins-new-techno-beat/1417/1/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:02, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I feel that a mention of the Komplete bundle in some form here would be useful, only as Komplete redirects to this article. Just sayin' 159.83.54.2 (talk) 23:16, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Komplete 

message: Native Instruments is now part of Soundwide. How is this best mentioned in the article? I assume the infobox will have to be updated.
I don't think there's an article about the group yet. KaraLG84 (talk) 14:20, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Decided to be  bold and do it. KaraLG84 (talk) 13:16, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Soundwide