lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Oceanic basin

message: I prefer to leave the list of basins off because they are really not that important.  But someone prefers that they stayon, I wish they'd say why. Zyzzy 29 June 2005 12:13 (UTC)Zyzzy
:Why list basins? It is good to see the scope of oceanic basins, to organize them by region something that the category does not do, and it allows quick access. --Bejnar (talk) 02:55, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: List of oceanic basins

message: "Earth is the only known solar planet with bimodal hypsography expressed as different kinds of crust" - what do we mean to say here? Do we mean to say bimodal hypsographies do not exist on other planets, because that simply isn't true. Mars has a bimodal hypsography, see Mars and Earth topography: a preliminary comparative analysis. If this sentence wants to emphasize the presence of different kinds of crust, it should be reworded for clarity.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Diadophus (talk • contribs) 15:57, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Bimodal hypsography
Talk:Canterbury, Victoria

message: It's good information that they set house pricing record in Canterbury but does it really belong in the list?  Maybe a separate sentence within the Culture paragraph above.Sween64 (talk) 06:38, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Xianwen Xu
Talk:List of South Korean television series

message: Hello, I'm wondering if the variety show that each idol made should be in a separate section or not..? Idol variety show like Blackpink House, EXO's Showtime, Going Seventeen, NCT Life, etc. As the topic of the show mostly just about the idol themselves, should we separate all in new section for K-Pop Idol only? The section is "K-Pop Idol" for example? Or any better ideas?
Or...
Those either will stay in the variety section or shows like Going Seventeen that mostly about game will be in "Game" show section? Then "K-Pop Survival" show section better renamed as just "Survival" show section to put other survival like Mr. Trot, Physical: 100, Street Woman Fighter, etc.? Please I need opinion, thank you in advance! Shenaall (talk) 08:44, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe "survival/competition" show will be great? Because I don't know where to put dance competition show and singing competition show... I don't know if I arrange the dividing section right/not because variety show genre is confusing.. it can be about music but also competition.. but then is it right to put dancing competition in the music section? But I feel putting all in the variety section will be to messy, it's a lot to read one by one... should we just put all in variety section but sort it by alphabet and add the sorting/searching template like Template:Compact TOC? Shenaall (talk) 08:57, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  About Variety Section
Talk:American and British English spelling differences

message: I've never been on this page before, but the caption was very hard to read even as a native speaker.  This was changed  and I'm considering undoing it if no one is opposed.  I don't understand why we would mix italics and non-italics, especially when it causes a forward slash to look almost identical to an italicized lowercase L. lukini (talk | contribs) 16:20, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mixed use of italics in the map caption 

message: The Elder Scrolls franchise has Coldharbour, NOT Coldharbor, regardless of British or American spelling. 114.108.202.223 (talk) 03:19, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  In popular culture. 

message: I'm from Jordan i studied there and lived my whole life there and British English is dominant and they teach it in schools our English curriculum is British you can check it out for yourself  176.29.159.10 (talk) 23:30, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jordan uses British English 

message: The "Hard and soft C" section claims that the one word where the letter C is pronounced /k/ before the vowels "e, i, y" is the word "sceptic" in British spelling, but I can think of "soccer" in both spellings which defies such claim. Terbofast (talk) 17:31, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: It says "One word", without any "the". The article thus is not making the claim that this is the only word where the letter C is pronounced /k/ before E I or Y.--Urszag (talk) 17:46, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced claim
Talk:Christian perfection

message: This section seems to be off topic. It spends a lot of time debating whether "perfection" applies to God or not. But this article is not about whether God is perfect or not, but about the theology of Christian perfection—how Christians can pursue spiritual perfection in this life. I don't know enough about this topic to rewrite the section, but it does need to be re-written from a contemporary Roman Catholic theological perspective. Ltwin (talk) 19:46, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I went ahead and just rewrote this section. It's essentially my summarizing of the Catholic Encyclopedia's article on the subject. Ltwin (talk) 07:38, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Roman Catholic teaching section

message: Reading through his journal - like you do - I was surprised to find him propounding Christian perfection in contradistinction to the attitudes of the Reformed churchmen around him. Yet there is no reference to his contribution / teaching in this article. Ender's Shadow Snr (talk) 08:30, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Perfection in George Fox, the founder of the Quakers 

message: The perfectibility of man has been discussed in many modern works not mentioned or apparently consulted, and goes back to the difference between the Greeks and the Jews, if not further. A good place to start is with John Passmore's The Perfectibility of Man (1969) available online in several places.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.28.145.174 (talk) 05:04, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  woefully incomplete 

message: It probably should be "perfect love, as Christian love is called" not "as Christian perfect is called". Don't want to change with no access to source. St.nerol (talk) 18:40, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suspected error in quote
Talk:Wold Newton, East Riding of Yorkshire

message: Why the page move? Surely Wold Newton was enough?
Perhaps this could have been discussed on Talk:Wold Newton before the move. Paul Tracy|\talk
:Presumably it was moved to distunguish it from Wold Newton, North East Lincolnshire Daibhid C 13:56, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is there any record of what happened to the original stone?
Septegram 18:00, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: From what I've read, the naturalist James Sowerby gained posession of it, and gave chunks to various scientists he thought might be interested. I think there's a bit in the British Museum. Daibhid C 14:50, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Stone? 

message: I have not added the  template for the church as there is a problem with the entry. I have e-mailed the site but they have not fixed the entry as yet. The template can be added when the entry is available. Entry number is 166849. Keith D (talk) 10:34, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Images of England
Talk:James Oberg

message: This article needs further sources for verification. Unsourced material should not be restored, per WP:BURDEN. Editing is also needed for adherence to style conventions, particularly the Manual of Style. Nikkimaria (talk) 00:25, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sourcing 

message: I will be updating and cleaning the page soon. If you have any suggestions, links, photos etc., I would be much obliged if you put it here on the talk page for me to include.
Akumiszcza (talk) 05:31, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleaning up 
Talk:Tonghae Satellite Launching Ground

message: KCNA calls this the "Tonghae Satellite Launching Ground" , time to rename the article?  Jpatokal (talk) 03:55, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename? 
Talk:Human sternum

message: A prior editor noted that this article appeared to be too technical. I've moved the template:technical onto this talk page per the template's usage, but fear I lack the requisite expertise to convert the article iteself into layman's vernacular.  Skilled anatomy folks are invited, please Be Bold --Flawiki 01:38, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  +template:technical 

message: What's it indicate if your sternum's kinda sore, especially when you flex your pecs or move your shoulders close together in front?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.72.21.221 (talk) 23:23, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sternal pain 

message: This makes it hard to discuss the Sternum page. Wegesrand (talk) 10:31, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I put  on it, so the admins will delete it. Then, you can recreate it to discuss the Sternum page. Rchard2scout (talk) 10:30, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Talk:Sternum redirects to Talk:Human sternum 

message: ...Really? I would think to call a sternal foramen a bullet hole, there'd have to be some kind of entry/exit wound in the skin overlaying it. ~Alison C. (Crazytales) 08:28, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sternal foramens can often be mistaken for bullet holes. 

message: Since this lemma is only a redirect to Sternum, all of the linked language versions should be moved to Sternum, too. I just did that for the German version, but it took me ten minutes to successfully save it, so maybe a more experienced user could move them more quickly? Thanks! --ComradeMicha (talk) 21:06, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other languages
Talk:Socially necessary labour time

message: It is not clear how the definitions of direct, indirect and embodied labor actually relate to the rest of the definition section (if at all). Would it be possible for someone to please clarify? It's been remarkably difficult to find a straight-forward answer to this elsewhere either.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.7.159.110 (talk) 02:37, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please clarify if SNLT includes indirect labor 

message: "Socially necessary labor time" seems to me a very unfortunate phrase, even if it was Marx's own. What is really meant, if I am not mistaken, is "labor time that is necessary relative to a given society," isn't that so?
Also, in general, the language in this article (as is not atypical, alas, in discussions of Marxism) is horribly and unnecessarily convoluted and complex. Experts become so used to speaking with other experts, and they get so used to speaking in terms common only among experts, that they forget how to speak to ordinary people. Listen to bureaucrats, for example, whose speech may be littered with an alphabet soup of acronyms impenetrable to the laymen.
Can't someone translate this into non-technical English??  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vaccine3* (talk • contribs) 18:40, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Socially Necessary Labor Time"
Talk:Kundalpur, Madhya Pradesh

message: The place believed to be the birth place of Mahavira is KundalPur in Nalanda district of Bihar, not Madhya Pradesh.
The new temples were in build at Kundalpur, Bihar in Feb 2010
Umangjn3005 (talk) 18:55, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request to correct article facts 
Talk:Liu Shifu

message: What four major groups? I know of two major groups, social anarchism and individualist anarchism, I don't know what other two major groups this is referring to. Zazaban (talk) 04:45, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "which Anarchists of all four major groups" 
Talk:Eddie Perfect

message: Who wrote this article -- Eddie's publicist? No way is this acceptable for Wikipedia in either tone or content in its original form, neutrality and use of language is entirely outside guidelines. I admire Eddie's work, but this is not the place for press releases. Dunks (talk) 10:25, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've just updated the article, each claim is cited and most material linked to other Wikipedia pages. I am going to remove the Citations template. 118.210.113.120 (talk) 10:16, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Dunks has a valid point: "currently stars ..." is hardly neutral. wcrosbie, Melbourne, Australia 08:19, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  (NB: In the name of full disclosure, this is 118.210.113.120 at another address.) "Currently stars" has been removed. Regardless, it could hardly be said that all of what he claims is *currently* true. Compare the current article with the state of the article in November 2008: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Eddie_Perfect&diff=396135083&oldid=248080120. It is hardly fair to claim that he has a point simply because a single NPV error was made by an amateur editor (me). 58.96.110.21 (talk) 14:59, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amendments 

message: "Eddie Perfect wins Victorian Premier's Literary Award", http://www.heraldsun.com.au/entertainment/eddie-perfect-wins-victorian-premiers-literary-award/story-e6frf96f-1225768588270, already cited in this article, claims that Eddie Perfect was 31 in 2009, making his year of birth 1978 or 1979. Does this qualify him to be removed from the hidden category "Year of Birth Unknown"? 118.210.113.120 (talk) 09:30, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of Birth 

message: Is a twitter comment about the performance notable criticism?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Decromin (talk • contribs) 15:07, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  NYE 2015 
Talk:CBU-24

message: Created by --WB-Frontier 29 June 2005 15:00 (UTC).
What do people think about links such as the one I've given? Even with the warning I'm a bit sceptical about it.
I've tried to stay neutral, but am obviously against weapons such as this.
The warning was enough to keep me from clicking on it—today—perhaps a day when I'm feeling more robust. Thanks for putting it in. —EncMstr 06:57, 30 November 2005 (UTC)

message: This article was conflating the CBU-24 bomb with the BLU-26 submunition which it contains. The real CBU-26 bomb is a dummy bomb (see Designation Systems link). Riddley 17:47, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Page move
Talk:Mun Se-gwang

message: The articles says that he (she?) was born in Japan but was South Korean. Is this right? There are no cites. --Cdogsimmons (talk) 16:59, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japanese? South Korean? 

message: "Mun was hanged in a Seoul prison four months after his failed attempt to assassinate President Park."
Very unclear and ambiguous.  Does it mean that he was executed in prison, or that he was murdered in prison, or that he committed suicide in prison? 5.80.55.112 (talk) 21:57, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Ambiguous
Talk:History of Science Museum, Oxford

message: Note that as of this week, the museum has rebranded with a new name, History of Science Museum, new official web site: https://www.hsm.ox.ac.uk/ and new official Twitter presence: https://twitter.com/HSMOxford . I work with the Museum so have a conflict of interest for editing the article directly, and I'm not 100% sure about how soon by convention we should retitle the article. MartinPoulter (talk) 16:13, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change of name 
Talk:Vegan

message: As the article Veganism is committedly preoccupied with those things that are not vegan, we are compelled to have an article committedly preoccupied with those things that are vegan. Veganism is all about avoiding things, dietary suppliments and animal cruelty. Of course that all goes hand in hand with things that are vegan but what about those things that are vegan? The food, the religious adherence, the plain old things that are vegan because they are something rather than are not? Should we not put that stuff somewhere? What page should those things go on then? I do not mind writing a short article about it. ~ R.T.G 20:01, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Jihad/Archive 5

message: I made a mistake above claiming that the translation that I posted came from Al-Muntakhab tafsir. That was Qaribullah/Ahmad Darwish translation:  http://homepages.uel.ac.uk/ali4786t/Qur'an_stuffz/ 
Muhammad Sarwar also translates it this way, "The Prophet is not supposed to take any captives to strengthen his position on earth ..."  *. I mixed that up when I said that that was Al-Muntakhab tafsir. That tafsir actually agrees with Hilai/Khan and other translations (though the word used is "subdue" not "great slaughter"). But the main thrust of tafsir still is condemnation of taking prisoners to make money. The tafsir says nothing about killing people who are already prisoners, an interpretation that Pename implied in the article. OneGuy 15:48, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Not Al-Muntakha Translation

message: [Mutliple uses of profanity. Deleted. ]- Ta bu shi da yu 21:21, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I've rolled back because a 3 day old comment should not be archived! Interestingly, Pename accused me of hiding things for the same reason. - Ta bu shi da yu 00:53, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)

text: Talk about pot calling ... For anyone unfamiliar with abuse of this guy, see User talk:134.22.70.218.  This guy insulted everyone here.  He also suddenly declared himself "anonymous" after RFC was posted against his user ID "Pename"  OneGuy 09:45, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pename 

message: ... and elsewhere in the article to improve flow and smooth out some rough spots. Eager to hear comments. BrandonYusufToropov 13:51, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Made major edits to address Bourbaki's concerns ...
Talk:Kikuko, Princess Takamatsu

message: I suggest this renamed as Kikuko, Princess Takamatsu. Main reason: it is inhuman to keep a woman totally under her husband's name, without allowing her own first name even be mentioned.
In addition, I believe that the proposal I made will be a good and suitable standard to be used in most oriental bio articles of royals and princes. 217.140.193.123 29 June 2005 15:26 (UTC)
*oppose. this has nothing to do with her being surpressed by her husband. Official titles of members of the Imperial Family are normally known by protocol by their titles only. Antares911 4 July 2005 09:18 (UTC)
*opppose 1) As per Antares911's statement.  2) "inhuman"?  Hardly.  That is pathetic exaggeration.
174.4.17.93 (talk) 04:36, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: With the abdication of the emperor Akihito and the succession of emperor Naruhito, some references in this article need adjustment.
174.4.17.93 (talk) 04:32, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs Revision
Talk:Jets'n'Guns

message: According to a developer comment on youtube "The port was done by us and LGP is selling it illegally. We never saw a dime from them." https://www.youtube.com/all_comments?v=SA7WD7z3AVg  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:470:1F15:D11:2C2E:4940:DF41:8949 (talk) 00:49, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Linux port

message: I removed a comment about JNG being harder than most shooter games. Speaking as an avid shmup fan, and knowing many other shmup fans, the general consensus IMO is that JNG is actually much more on the easy end of the spectrum, at least until the very hardest difficulty settings. At any rate, either way it's a matter of opinion and probably shouldn't be included. --71.146.71.32 10:57, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Should I link the first instance of Xoxx to socks, since the pun is quite obvious? -- Altiris Helios Exeunt 06:39, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, that would be original research. How do we know it's not merely meant to be a strange alien name?--Drat (Talk) 09:53, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  On [[socks|Xoxx]]... 
Talk:Opryland USA

message: I'm a former resident of the area and visited the park several times, including one year as a season passholder. If someone could clarify what improvements need to be made, I might could help.Realkyhick 07:08, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  So what needs to be cleaned up? 

message: ...I removed the cleanup template tag. If someone can identify the original problem, I'll be glad to work on it. Realkyhick 21:45, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Since no one could identify what needed to be cleaned up... 

message: Is this really necessary? It clutters the article up. The websites pointed out below the article supply all of this information anyway... Holtskee 07:52, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Former Attractions Section

message: I ran across an article recently that said Gaylord Entertainment was considering opening a new theme park.  This was in January of 2010.  I know after the May 2010 flood, those rumors intensified.  I included a link, but then i found that there was no reference section.  I added a reference section to the bottom as well.--Navi555 (talk) 16:33, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Opryland Reopening and Reference Page
Talk:Cape Spear

message: If Greenland is part of North America then Cape Spear is not the easterly point on the continent, as some have suggested in recent debate. CBC News
Is Greenland even counted in the total surface area of North America? --Madchester June 29, 2005 15:48 (UTC)
When records are set for North America to Europe transatlantic sailings, rowing, flights, etc. they never originate from Greenland. I believe that it is premature to write in this article any reference to Greenland as the most easterly point in North America. 
Maybe we should also have a look at the most westerly point of Europe as it would fall to Saint-Pierre and Miquelon.  HJKeats 6 July 2005 15:28 (UTC)
When the countries of North America are listed is Denmark ever listed as one? If Greenland contains the most easterly point in North America, then the most westerly point in Europe is what? Aruba? French Guiana? The British Virgin Islands?
I changed the line about greenland and the most easterly point, as the line that was placed in there was blatant POV-the line I put in identifies that there is a debate, and I hope, is not POV :).
One thing to keep in mind here; the question is is Greenland North America? That has nothing to do with the question whether Denmark is in NA or St. Pierre or Aruba being in Europe. St. Pierre and M. are a part of the country France but certainly not the Continent of Europe. If you argue that Greenland is part of NA, which I would say it is, it doesn't mean in any way that its repercussion is then to name St. Pierre or Aruba part of Europe. Distinguish country from continent here is the key. Also, please sign your comments on talk pages.--Kalsermar 20:50, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Greenland part of North America?
Talk:Bell Beaker culture

message: The author of Papac et al 2021 has published his thesis which can be found under the title "Tracking population history, social structure and intergroup exchange in Neolithic to Bronze Age Europe using ancient human and virus genomes". In it he mentions how Bell Beaker lineages and CWC male lineages (y-DNA) are completely non-overlapping even in times where these groups were living in the same area. Worth a read for anyone interested in Bronze Age dynamics 2A02:85F:F89A:3C6B:50EF:8F29:D9A4:7F63 (talk) 11:56, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Luka Papac archaeogenetic thesis 

message: The first paragraph asserts that there was a shift of interpretation.  The second paragraph asserts that DNA work is ALSO evidence for the migration theory.  The problem with that is that the first paragraph, whilst describing details of migration does not give any evidence for this.  Apart from DNA what IS the new evidence that makes them feel this is about migration ?
*  Secondly, I know this is not the place for general talk on the subject, but I don't know where else I would throw out this thought-  We say that 90% of the genes had changed to Beaker People in the British Isles, that is HUGE.  Would be suggest that that involved disease ?
IceDragon64 (talk) 01:01, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renewed emphasis on migration- questions
Talk:Sergei Shamba

message: WHen is he born?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.34.228.193 (talk) 08:38, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled