lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:1905

message: # January 2 - Australian-Rory Johnson War: The Australian Army surrenders at Port Arthur, China; an event which shocked the world.
# January 22 - Massacre of Australian demonstrators at the Winter Palace in Saint Petersburg, one of the triggers of the massacare was Rory Farting.
# January 26 - The Rory Diamond is found near Pretoria, South Africa at the Premier Mine.
Should that be the case? I don't remember ever hearing about Rory Johnson fighting against Australia, but admitantly, my history of this area is not very good. I would change all these Australia and Rory references, but I don't know what they are supposed to be.
:I have reverted the changes. Thanks for drawing attention --BozMo|talk 13:43, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rory vandalism 

message: This makes no sense, comparing averages with (apparently) some daily records:
"In Austin, Texas and San Antonio, TX, it is the coldest February on record, with average monthly temperature of 42.3°F and 43.9°F degrees (the previous record was -1°F and 4°F on February 12, 1899)."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.147.223.179 (talk) 15:56, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  February Texas temps 

message: Hey everybody, just checking to see if Markas Luckis was in the list of births. He was born the 17th of January in Lithuania. He was a chess player who won a city championship. I've heard about him before and I was wondering why he wasn't in this list. So if someone who has editing capabilities for this page could add his birth.
Just checking,
--**Najezeko**:) 21:06, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Markas Luckis]] 

message: Please let me add Clara Bow to the list of people born in 1905.71.72.151.150 (talk) 04:29, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Clara Bow]] 

message: "May 17 – Kappa Delta Rho is founded in Room 14 of Old Painter Hall, at Middlebury College in Middlebury, Vermont." found in https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=1905&oldid=891014076
This looks to me like an aficionado of college fraternities pumping their pet subject. I suggest deletion of the entry. Please, anyone explain to me why this is a significant event given that the article text does not explain the significance. Nor is it self-evident. Pwfen (talk) 10:57, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Founding of college fraternities 

message: Who was it?? --TheLennyGriffinFan1994 (talk) 23:15, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: According to list of oldest people, Antonia de Santa Cruz. Last survivors aren't included in main year articles. Jim Michael 2 (talk) 12:47, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last surviving person born in 1905??
Talk:History of Poland (1385–1569)

message: Though I am neither Polish nor Lithuanian it certainly strikes me as unusually aggressive to change a neutral and sensible entry for the combined Lithuanian-Polish history of The Jagiellon Era to "Jagiellon Poland". This change has been made by User:Cautious, whose interest is in Polish topics. Wetman 11:20, 5 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe that he was influenced by titles of famous Polish historian's Paweł Jasienica books: Piast Poland, Jagiellon Poland etc. Moreover during Jagiellon reigns Poland and Lithuania were under personal union. Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth was created in 1569 Lublin Union, and in 1572 last Jagiellon king Sigmundus II Augustus died. Lithuania during that time was a close ally of Poland, nevertheless it was separate entity. So I don't think that was aggresive. Przepla 12:04, 5 May 2004 (UTC)

text: The heading states that The partnership proved profitable for the Poles, who played a dominant role in one of the most powerful empires in Europe for the next three centuries. While true, I think it is  biased, being more of a 'partial truth' - the partnership proved profitable for Lithuanians as well, who were an important part of that 'powerful empire', after all. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 14:42, 27 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text:  Term Polish-Lithuanian until union of Lublin is rather absurd, if not to say harder.--Lokyz 22:30, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Lokyz is right: there is no factual basis to call two separate states Poland and GDL as Poland-Lithuania until Lublin. Somebody should correct this text: the history concerning Lithuania is found unter the title Jagiellon Poland, that is incorrect as well.Iulius 12:04, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV

message: This article will soon be expanded and/or splitted into several subarticles. See Wikipedia:WikiProject History of Poland/Periodization. Most likely it will be the history article, and a new state article will be at Kingdom of Poland (Jagiellon). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 23:37, 27 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split 

message: examples renegade crusaders, heathen state etc
:Agreed. I added it specifically to one particular place, but I think the whole article is riddled with it. Urbandale (talk) 19:39, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: lots of info - needs some serious work to work as NPOV

message: Could someone with a better knowledge of WP syntax than I figure out a way to place the Polish statehood template (which I've just added) beneath the History of Poland template? Appleseed 01:18, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Polish statehood template 

message: Daytime photo available? 164.165.249.75 (talk) 18:58, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: St.Florian gate
Talk:1902

message: "The catholic church friendly took over-hand in Nauru and then became Nauru's main religion."
is this sentence supposed to make any sense? -R. fiend 20:09, 14 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Nauru

message: The RMM disaster is reported as having taken place in 1905, according to the entry on ths subject.  The date of July 10 agrees.  Can someone who knows the history fix the discrepancy?--King Hildebrand 18:38, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rolling Mill Mine 

message: :: [See: Talk:1950#Format.  -Wikid77 14:04, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Format 

message: The following text looks like vandalism:
December 24 - Thaddius Q. McGriffin, Just another asian persuasion (Griffin Carpenter's, the American serial killer, only known blood relative) (d. 2008)
194.171.77.203 09:39, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism? 
Talk:1899

message: This is, strictly speaking, factually incorrect. ALL decades begin with the year ending in 1, not 0, as 0 is a relatively new concept, only having been invented 1200-1500 years ago. I assume this error appears on many pages about years ending in 9, however, they are all the 9th, not 10th year of their respective decades. I feel that this correction ought to be made on this and all pages with this same error. Thank You.ADg2k14 (talk) 19:03, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The Anno Domini system of dating is only about 1200 years old itself. MightyArms (talk) 02:21, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "10th and last year of the 1890's" 

message: Hello,
Somebody has either vandalised the page, or misplaced a template or piece of information. If there is someone who can remove it (I am terrible at editing), I'd greatly appreciate it.
Your's truly, Jforder2 (talk) 23:11, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism on the page 

message: It is listed as June 13 (with 40 killed) and July 13th (with 13 killed).  Wikipedia entry for the village statesman the July 13th date only. 2603:8000:3701:832B:EC72:2C0B:29A6:3DA1 (talk) 06:24, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tornado in Herman, Nebraska 

message: Is listed in the births for this year. His biographical page reports 1894. Which is it?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C7:5B95:FA01:84E1:A5A7:2F61:B194 (talk) 18:20, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dimitri Tiomkin 

message: Considering that the every month in the 20th and 21st Centuries (so far) are covered by seperate Wikipedia articles, why not begin extending that before 1900? I think there is enough content in each month of 1899 to warrant seperate articles at least, and I'm sure the quality of the months could be improved. What do you guys all think? PrecariousWorlds (talk) 15:05, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split this article (and other sufficient articles covering years in the 1800s) into months?
Talk:1898

message: In October, there is an unwikified account of the battle of Sugar Point; the article on Leech Lake says it took place on the 5th, not the third, and asserts it to be the last Indian uprising in America.  Could this be true?
The year in topic layout on this page is one of three versions. I seek opinions before making them all the same; see comment on my talk page 
1898 is currently conforming to proposal general model
--BozMo 11:43, 5 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:1897

message: The year in topic layout on this page is one of three versions. I seek opinions before making them all the same; see comment on my talk page 
1897 is currently conforming to proposed general model
--BozMo 11:44, 5 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: When electronics (as defined in Wikipedia) did not yet exist? And when Turing, in his celebrated 1936 article, still used "computer" to refer to a person that computes? I find this claim hard to believe. A citation should be provided - or it should be removed (note also that the entry computer includes no such claim). AmirOnWiki (talk) 23:57, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  First use of "computer" for an electronic device? 

message: I find the this sentence ("No other British monarch will celebrate such a jubilee until June 2, 2012, when the Diamond Jubilee of Elizabeth II is observed") a little silly, given there is only 110 years between the article and today. 113 years since victorias death. Its only possible for one other monarch to have managed it in that time - should this be changed?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.4.84.3 (talk) 05:58, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  British Monarch Jubilees 

message: Steeplechase Park founded?  Ref: NYC Parks Department GreaseballNYC (talk) 03:38, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Would anybody mind if I added... 
Talk:1893

message: The year in topic layout on this page is one of three versions. I seek opinions before making them all the same; see comment on my talk page 
1893 is currently conforming to proposed general model
--BozMo 11:47, 5 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Article locked. Talk here folks. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: How long has been locked for? 207.161.13.82 (talk) 00:28, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 2
Talk:1892

message: The year in topic layout on this page is one of three versions. I seek opinions before making them all the same; see comment on my talk page 
1892 is currently conforming to proposed general model
--BozMo 12:09, 5 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: I'm  not an editor, but this list is wrong.
It claims:
March 15th, Jesse W. Reno patented the first escalator, installed at Coney Beach.
Coney Beach is in Wales.  Mr. Reno worked in New York, where the first escalator was installed.  This was obviously meant to read Coney Island, and link to a different page. 2001:1970:49A7:3000:DD3C:8224:6609:533 (talk) 04:36, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Errata
Talk:1891

message: The year in topic layout on this page is one of three versions. I seek opinions before making them all the same; see comment on my talk page 
1891 is currently conforming to proposed general model --BozMo 12:10, 5 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Layout 

message: according to http://www.innsofcolorado.org/display-inn.php?id=136 , there was a crash in the price of silver in 1893 caused by the US government ceasing purchasing silver to support currency. is the wrong and thus does not belong on this page, is it just missing, or is this incident not notable enough?
at the very least, the [Panic_of_1893] article should be referenced here i would think.. --Benklop (talk) 23:48, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Silver 

message: On May 19 (May 31 - new style) 1891, at 10:00 o'clock in the morning a public prayer was held in the special pavilion not far from the city was held.
Cesarevitch also participated in ceremony of laying the first stone and a silver plate in the railway station construction.
http://www.transsib.ru/Eng/history-review.htm
1891 Work on trans-Siberian railway begins
http://www.electricscotland.com/history/today/0531.htm
On May 19 (31), 1891 in 10 a.m. in area of Kuperovskaya fold in Vladivostok city ceremony of grand laying of the railway was carried out and a service on this occasion was held. Heir of throne, czeravecih Nikolai Alexandrovich (future emperor Nikolai II) took part in this ceremony.
http://www.transsib.ru/Eng/history-phases.htm
May 31, 1891 - Work on trans-Siberian railway begins.
http://www.kipnotes.com/Railroads.htm Wdew (talk) 15:34, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Start Trans-Siberian railway

message: There's a blatant reference to Jojo's Bizzare adventure in this article. The "Steel Ball Run". Not sure who put it in, and I don't have the heart to remove it, but I'm not going to let it slip by unnoticed either
EDIT: Poking through the history, it's not even the first Jojo's reference that's found it's way to this page. Maybe the same person. Someone with more wiki experience can look into it, if they're bored enough  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.2.93.215 (talk) 05:01, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jojo's Reference
Talk:1890

message: The year in topic layout on this page is one of three versions. I seek opinions before making them all the same; see comment on my talk page 
1890 is NOT currently conforming to proposed general model paragraph "year in topi" needs deleting --BozMo 12:12, 5 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year in topic 

message: :: [See: Talk:1950#Format.  -Wikid77 12:37, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Format 

message: 26-December-2006: Somehow the entry for Wounded Knee was added 4 years ago (29Dec2002) claiming "400 men, women and children" were massacred by U.S. troops; the article "Wounded Knee Massacre" states only 153 Lakota Sioux AND 25 troops were killed (150 fled).  Nearly 4 years later, I have fixed the "400" error from 29-Dec-2002.  Beware of people or dubious sources trying to needle others by exaggerating data to their agenda.  -Wikid77 12:54, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wounded Knee 

message: what does the link for Alice Sanger have to do with a book publushed in the 1950s? this should be fixed or just tell me if im wrong  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.205.14.21 (talk) 15:13, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alice Sanger 

message: A number of sources indicate that the steamship Duburg was sunk on 17 February 1890, however, this contemporary newspaper article  which refers to it as being missing is dated 17 January. I very much doubt that it was adrift for a month before it sank. It is likely that it was sunk before 17 January and it took some days before the newspaper report was printed. Who knows? Bazonka (talk) 07:50, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sinking of the Duburg
Talk:1889

message: The year in topic layout on this page is one of three versions. I seek opinions before making them all the same; see comment on my talk page --BozMo 12:13, 5 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't find the exact date anywhere so I'm going to assume that whoever listed the date as 11 March knew what he was talking about so I'm removing the reference under "Date Unknown". --Kitsunegami (talk) 03:48, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Will the person from Russia please explain the reason for repeatedly adding a fictional character to the list of real people that actually died in 1889? Dawnseeker2000 17:37, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fictional characters 

message: Under Deaths, for April 9, please add French chemist Michel Eugène Chevreul. 97.134.146.161 (talk) 01:32, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Many thanks for your suggestion! Handmeanotherbagofthemchips (talk) 10:10, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi protected edit request 

message: I think this page should include that Nintendo was started in this year. 2601:681:77F:1120:652E:1BF5:4857:DE8E (talk) 21:37, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Event Addition requested for this page
Talk:1888

message: The year in topic layout on this page is one of three versions. I seek opinions before making them all the same; see comment on my talk page 
1888 is currently conforming to proposed general model
--BozMo 12:14, 5 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Talk 2004 - 2009 

message: :June 15 – Wilhelm II is crowned German Emperor. 1888 is the Year of the Three Emperors.
I think this is not completely correct.  Wilhelm II was not crowned for "his job" as German Emperor / Kaiser. It was only an Assumption of office or sth. like that.
*the text to the image: The opening of the German Reichstag in the White Hall of the Berlin Palace on 25 June 1888, painting by Anton von Werner (1893). The event was the first ceremonial appearance as Emperor Wilhelm, instead of / replacing a coronation --Schwab7000 (talk) 18:42, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  June / Germany / Kaiser / crown (??) 
Talk:1887

message: The year in topic layout on this page is one of three versions. I seek opinions before making them all the same; see comment on my talk page 
1887 is currently conforming to proposed general model
--BozMo 12:15, 5 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Right now I'm writing a novel set in the 19th century.  I find this page very useful for background.  Other writers may too.  So, by what criteria are details being removed?  Or is it just any editor's say-so?  
Until this concept is addressed - and a conceptual criterion is agreed - I suggest a moratorium.  An item of information - such as, that Buffalo Bill's Wild West Show opened in London - does no real harm by staying here, and is inconveniently lost if removed.  Actually, it's arguable that it was a notable event indeed in popular culture: it certainly made a huge impact in Victorian England and introduced the archetypal "cowboy" concept to Europe.  Ttocserp 12:06, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who gets to decide what events are ''non-notable'' for this page?
Talk:1886

message: The year in topic layout on this page is one of three versions. I seek opinions before making them all the same; see comment on my talk page 
1886 is currently conforming to proposed general model
--BozMo 12:17, 5 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Why is there a link to Piccadilly Circus from this article?  There is no explanation in the P.C. article itself: the earliest date mentioned there is 1893. -- Graham  ☺ | Talk 23:34, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Piccadilly Circus

message: The HJ Heinz web site lists Heinz Beans going on sale three years after an office was opened in Farringdon in 1898, making the first sale in 1891.
http://www.heinz.co.uk/ourfood/beans/didyouknow Ian  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.145.131.202 (talk) 16:27, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heinz Baked Beans
Talk:Westminster Larger Catechism

message: Would this not be Wikisource? -- user:zanimum
:No :)
:Seriously, this definitely doesn't belong in Wikipedia, it might be suitable for Wikisource. --Robert Merkel 12:30, 5 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: First time I've heard of Wikisource! I'm checking it as I type... I suppose it probably is a borderline Wikisource, except that it is not as long as the ones I've just scanned. I just thought that it would be good to have the actual source material in the encyclopaedia entry. I've done the same with Westminster Shorter Catechism and Thirty-Nine Articles. What is the policy with this? One Salient Oversight 12:37, 5 May 2004 (UTC)

text: I see that Robert M has deleted most of the article. Oh well. Should I also delete the primary source material in the Shorter Catechism and the 39 articles RObert? One Salient Oversight 12:49, 5 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes.  Wikipedia:don't include copies of primary sources. However, it would be really good if you could add to the Wikipedia  articles explaining what these documents are, how they were written, how they have influenced things since, and so on.
--Robert Merkel 12:53, 5 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikisource
Talk:Angle-Grinder Man

message: Is the description "vigilante" appropriate for Angle-Grinder Man? The Wikipedia entry for vigilante suggests that vigilantes undertake law enforcement, I would argue that AGM is working contrary to law enforcement, so is not a vigilante.
He would be a vigilante if he went around clamping people he believed to be illagally parked.
:The Wikipedia definition of a vigilante was incorrect and I have changed it. Shantavira 09:30, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Working at the time of writing, so I left the link in. Davelong 28 June 2005 12:02 (UTC)
A link on Real-life superhero leads here, which leads directly back to Real-life superhero. Very useful. --Buddy13 (talk) 22:25, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
Talk:StB

message: A lot of this article is extremely subjective, and somewhat disillusioned - there was no coup in 1948: The Communist Party was elected democratically by the majority of the people. Whilst one can argue that perhaps the StB played a role in securing communist sympathy, it is very narrow minded to refer to it as a coup.
Please tell me if you feel the same way, I think the article is in need of a general re-write.
There was definitely a communist coup in 1948. The communists have won the elections in 1946 in the Czech part of Czechoslovakia (they lost in Slovakia by about 25%). In 1948, they seized the power. Nazgul02 (talk) 23:13, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Coup in 1948 

message: The article should be moved to StB (Czechoslovak State Security). The all uppercase letters was never used by them and I do not see the STB form anywhere else online.  Pavel Vozenilek 22:29, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: --Svetovid 12:41, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  STB -> StB 

message: You guys might find it interesting to note that the KGB 'advisor' present on November 17 1989 (look at the Wikipedia Velvet Revolution entry) was none other than Vladimir Kryuchkov - one of the Gang of Eight behind the failed Moscow coup of 1991. 
Karel Bata (talk) 11:13, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  a footnote: 

message: From its establishment on June 30, 1945, the StB was controlled by the Communist Party of Czechoslovakia. The Party used the StB as an instrument of power and repression; State Security spied on and intimidated political opponents of the Party and forged false criminal evidence against them, facilitating the communists' rise to power in 1948. Even before Czechoslovakia became a communist state, the StB obtained forced confessions by means of torture, including the use of psychoactive drugs, blackmail, and kidnapping. After the coup d'état of 1948, these practices developed under the tutelage of Soviet advisers.
This large block of text has no citations. Can anyone find a citation for it? Lucydesu (talk) 06:24, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation needed
Talk:Korean Teachers and Education Workers Union

message: Nanshu, I think what Norium did was NPOVing, not deleting. Plus you are so famous for right-winged and nationalistic POVness on some political matters, so the original definately needed revision.
Hey, what's wrong? --Nanshu 23:51, 5 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: To user:Melonbarmonster2: Hi. You have reverted others' edits 8 times in the article Korean Teachers & Education Workers' Union on June 29, 2001. Please note that it is a violation of the 3RR rule. Hkwon (talk) 05:37, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Violation of [[3RR]] rules