Template talk:The Rolling Stones

message: Hey, is there any way that this could be made smaller? It is really too big for album articles and makes the whole bottom really cluttered. gren グレン 01:03, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Hopefully it's better now. I seem to have accidentally edited an older version, so Taylor, Loog Oldham and Klein are back, but since I'm not sure why they were removed in the first place I'll leave them there for now. Flowerparty■ 02:25, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

message: I've made a template, Template:Rolling Stones albums based on the content removed from this, which we can use on album pages (where it was pretty useful) without cluttering other Stones-related pages. Have a look. ProhibitOnions 19:55, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course, now that we have templates that can hide and show content, it might make sense to put everything back...  ProhibitOnions  (T) 22:01, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Albums template

message: i don't get why the bootleg Brussels Affair is listed as a "miscellaneous album" alongside an official release (Jamming with Edward), and i vote for removing it.  to me calling it an "unreleased live album" is inaccurate; the Stones did want to release a concert album from the 72 tour, but if there's any evidence that they ever thought about releasing the bootleg circulating as Brussels Affair i've never heard/read about it.  moreover, Brussels Affair is only one of many titles that concert bootleg circulates under; plus which, there are lots of other famous/widely circulating Stones bootlegs, and since they're not listed, why is this one?? 
is there already a wiki article on or list of Rolling Stones bootlegs?  to me that would be more appropriate than mysteriously listing this one bootleg in the template. share your thoughts? Sssoul (talk) 10:40, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It used to have an article, in which case it made sense to include it in the template.  The article was deleted yesterday, so now it no longer does.  I've removed it.  Wasted Time R (talk) 10:50, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  consensus sought on deleting Brussels from "miscellaneous albums" 

message: I think that the tours deserve placement on the template before the films/videos. The articles are more complete and there seems to be more relevance to their inclusion then a loose collection of Stones releases. Stan weller (talk) 00:56, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm glad the tours are back, I don't care that much about where in the order.  But tour names should not be quoted or italicized; they are just regular proper nouns.  Wasted Time R (talk) 01:07, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tours vs. Films/Videos 

message: I'd like to add Ollie E. Brown (percussionist on Black and Blue, Love You Live and 1975 Tour of the Americas) to the "Collaborators" section of the template. Any objections? 28bytes (talk) 06:40, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Collaborators 

message: Remove "Video releases", as there is already an entire template dedicated to their videography. 24.127.236.115 (talk) 21:04, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the  template. MadGuy7023 (talk) 21:49, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 12 December 2019