lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Dunfermline Burghs (UK Parliament constituency)

message: This article says that the constituency was called "Dunfermline Burghs" until 1974, even though the District of burghs article says that the term Burghs continued in use in the names of some constituencies until 1955. Neither article cites any sources; which (if any) of them is right? --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 12:22, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Looking through Google Books lends credence to the 1974 date.  There are several official publications from the late 1950s and early 1960s which use "Dunfermline Burghs" (the only one with a preview is , a Government publication from 1960), and nothing official after 1974. Warofdreams talk 03:49, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

text: Fair enough!  Kinda weird to retain the Burghs name when it ceased to be a District of burghs constituency, but it wouldn't be the first example I've seen of odd naming practices. Thanks for the research, and sorry for being a pedant :) --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 13:31, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name confusion, and date of abolition
Template talk:Summarize

message: The pages with this template are being placed into :Category:Wikipedia maintenance templates, but I don't see where the problem is.  --Gadget850 ( Ed) 12:23, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: BTW, Wikipedia:Template documentation shows a good method of maintaining the documentation so that it can be easily updated if the template is protected.  --Gadget850 ( Ed) 12:28, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

text: Fixed.  sandbox and testcase pages added for testing updates.  --Gadget850 ( Ed) 03:24, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps they should be placed in some sort of category though, e.g. :Category:Articles that need to be summarized and :Category:Articles missing summaries? Richard001 (talk) 11:15, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Category problem

message: The documentation of this template should be improved and make more clear. In addition, it would be useful if the full skeleton template (template with all available fields) would be added and explanations what should be added in one or other field are provided in the table format. E.g., this template could be used also for a particular section, not for the whole article; however, the template's documentation misses this option entirely. Beagel (talk) 07:50, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Skeleton tempalte
Talk:Coupon (finance)

message: I propose that this page be merged with Coupon rate. Finnancier 12:39, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal

message: I would like to see something about the coupon date. If a bond is semi-annual and one of the coupon dates is May 31, is the other coupon date then December 1 of November 30 ? Ruerd (talk) 09:09, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coupon date 

message: :The coupon rate is the yield the bond that has been paid on its issue date; however, this yield can change as the value of the bond changes and thus giving the bond's yield to maturity. Bonds having higher coupon rates are therefore more desirable for investors than those having lower coupon rates.
Perhaps it's due to my limited Emglish but I can't parse this paragraph. Something about a yield, and something paid on its issue date...?
Also, isn't the face value and number of coupons determined and fixed at the date of issue? If so, then how can the coupon rate change? And there's even these preprinted fancy paper-coupons. These obviously can't change...\— Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.254.136.152 (talk) 20:11, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coupon rate paragraph
Talk:Matthew Bryza

message: Bryza has felt it necessary to state that his marriage to Baran has no influence on his political stance.--Jackkalpakian 12:33, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: FH is an activist journalist with a Cold War agenda.  He is not a credible source on Mr. Bryza or US Foreign policy in general.  The references to Hiatt should be removed. It is the policy of this author not to engage in deletions -- it is up to the author who put the material there to remove it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.12.203.97 (talk) 22:53, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fred Hiatt 
Talk:Zoom

message: This article does not contain a concise sentence that gives insight as to what the article pertains to or is about. Clarkemmm (talk) 18:52, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introductory Sentence 

message: I can't find any information page saying that the currently most-sought items should go first. There are however pages such as WP:RECENTISM that seek to avoid ending up with a page that has to be manually kept up-to-date. Out of the 4 items under "Computing" the video chat software is obviously the most likely to become discontinued/irrelevant in the next 10-20 years. 93.136.8.9 (talk) 03:01, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Most sought first 
Talk:Dresden amen

message: What did the Dresden amen sound like? I am blind so I can't read the scores in the article - I have searched on the Internet but I couldn't find audio of the amen. Even a midi file of the six notes would be helpful. Thanks, Graham87 12:51, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Audio 

message: ... either five notes or seven notes, not six. If you want to eliminate repeated notes from the count, eliminate both repeats, not just one. TooManyFingers (talk) 17:32, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  ... a sequence of ...
Talk:Magnapop (album)

message: The article states "The original cover to the album features the band's name in pale blue, with the re-release lettering in golden yellow.", whereas the text below the cover image reads "Cover to the re-released of the album, with blue lettering instead of yellow". I believe the colouring of the band name is hardly worth mentioning at all. But if its is mentioned then at least it should be correct and consistent. The current information is neither. My own copy of the album is the version by Solid (527.9017.20) which has the band name in gold, not blue. But also in the bottom right as opposed to the top left on most editions. But as far as I can tell from Discogs all the original 1991/1992 editions (Caroline, Play It Again Sam, Solid, whether on CD, vinyl or cassette) have the name in gold or yellow, not blue. See e.g. []. I think it is best to simply remove both statements, as it is fairly trivial anyway. --MichielN (talk) 11:21, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Colouring of bandname on album cover
Talk:West Hartlepool R.F.C.

message: I deleted pretty much the entire "History" section, as it was a straight lift from this site, with no assertion of permission being granted under an acceptable licence. Repeatedly referring to the club as "we" is totally inappropriate for an encyclopedia in any case. I've put in a very brief historical summary, but as I don't know the subject very well I've simply put in a cleanup tag, and will leave improvement to those who do. Loganberry (Talk) 03:06, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major deletion on copyvio grounds 

message: These sections really have no encyclopaedic value and so should be removed. They are not present on other similar articles. noq (talk) 20:21, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location/Directions
Talk:The Wind in the Willows (disambiguation)

message: i am kinda lost here...i am looking to find the Wind in the Willows script that i can print off here, its writen by alan bennet. some one help me please?
:I too am confused.  The script itself would not be downloadable from wikipedia, but there ought to be some reference of the stage play called "The Wind In The Willows", separate to "Toad of Toad Hall" about which there is info--TimothyJacobson (talk) 16:30, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a list of some adaptations on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Wind_in_the_Willows so maybe there isn't just one definitive version--TimothyJacobson (talk) 16:36, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Association of Harrogate Apprentices

message: Would anyone at all have an intake photo from Bradley squadron 74b please 82.45.220.160 (talk) 16:38, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Group intake photo 74b
Talk:Franz Sieber

message: @Rkitko - You and Hesperian voted for the deletion of botanist-inline2 and now are in the process of deleting botanist-inline. This means that you have made it impossible to include a template in the text. Now it belatedly occurs to you that an inline piece of text detailing the author abbreviation will not automatically generate the category which you feel is necessary - well, now the category will have to be added manually. Rotational (talk) 17:29, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Sir, it didn't belatedly occur to me; I've known the template transcludes a category with the rest of the wording. And no, it's not impossible to include a template in the text.  still exists. Also, to clarify, I am not "in the process of deleting " - I haven't even published my support for the deletion at the discussion. I do believe that the use of the inline botanist template didn't have enough discussion before implementation. If you believe  is inferior, propose changes rather than attempting to circumvent discussion by creating templates which have no consensus for use. Personally, I still prefer the botanist template as is, though I might be open to a well-reasoned argument for why the template should be dropped in favor of including the information in the lead. It's still unclear what many other botany folks think regarding that. --Rkitko (talk) 13:58, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inline templates
Talk:Army Foundation College

message: Note: In the duty of care section, a short string of text was copied from Army Foundation College recruit abuse investigation 2014–2018 
Fugitivedave (talk) 10:09, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copied text
Talk:Pinocchio (soundtrack)

message: I am confused about some of the information on this page. The page states that three of the film's deleted songs were released on "a multi-record 78-RPM 1940 cover album". I am assuming that this is referring to the collection of 78rpm singles mentioned under the "Original release" section, as the only other soundtrack release mentioned in the article is the 2006 release. However the article states that only three discs (with two songs on each disc) were released in the collection and the only deleted song included on any of these three discs is "Turn on the Old Music Box". I know that the other two deleted songs that were released were "Jiminy Cricket" and "Three Cheers for Anything" and I have read elsewhere that four records were released in the collection, so I am assuming that the fourth record featured those two songs. Does anyone know for sure whether it was three or four records released in this collection? It seems to me like it was probably four, but I don't know for sure.--Jpcase (talk) 23:32, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of records in the 78rpm releases
Talk:Nizier Anthelme Philippe

message: * Something useful may appear at http://www.mphilippe.org/ at some point.  The Empress Alexandra Feodorovna made mention of M. Philippe in letters to the Tsar in 1916 (in context with Rasputin).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fonetikli (talk • contribs) 06:42, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Fourth-dimension roller coaster

message: Hi all! I think that the definition of a 4th dimension roller coaster is a bit too generic. Intamin ZacSpins are not 4th Dimension coasters. KoopaTroop (talk) 23:10, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the Roller Coaster DataBase they are. Here is a listing of 4th Dimension roller coasters. It lists X2 and Eejanaika alongside all of the Intamin ZacSpins. As RCDB is the primary source for roller coaster information, another reliable source would need to be introduced to validate the changing of the defintion. Themeparkgc  Talk  00:17, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Definition of a 4D coaster
Talk:D-class Melbourne tram

message: I have raised the option of moving much of the specification data from the infobox to a table at Talk:Z-class Melbourne tram#Proposed reorganisation of specification data. Reasoning and a mock up are available at said page, input from editors would be greatly appreciated on that page. Liamdavies (talk) 08:49, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed reorganisation of specification data 

message: I am proposing to remove the hyphen from the title of this tram article, as the official nomenclature from the Department of Transport and Planning is not to have hyphens in tram class names. Examples include on their official website , the Melbourne Tram Plan  and the PTV website . Other common unofficial sources like Vicsig also do not have a hyphen. I'm also proposing to change all the other Melbourne tram class article names in a similar manner, any feedback welcome! Takerlamar (talk) 00:09, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing hyphen from article name 
Talk:North Marine Road Ground, Scarborough

message: "A single international century has been scored here" -- err, plus at least another two from Charlotte Edwards??  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.232.254.66 (talk) 09:42, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Any source for this? Keith D (talk) 12:26, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: International Centuries
Talk:Rising Down

message: Changed track listing to include Pow Wow 2 (being sold as a standard track on iTunes) and added the correct featured artists for all tracks. If Pow Wow 2 doesn't come on the cd (I'm overseas) feel free to change it back.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.177.162.124 (talk) 05:48, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This page absolutely needs a "political message" section or something similar.  Here are some sources:  (already added), , , , .  Cazort (talk) 02:02, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Political message
Talk:Sawdust (album)

message: According to http://www.thekillersuk.com/singles.htm it says sweet talk is a single, someone needs to make a page for it or something.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.147.128.59 (talk) 20:54, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sweet Talk single? 
Talk:University of Hull: Scarborough Campus

message: Due to the lack of notability, poor quality and lack of any sourcing whatsoever in the article. SnoopingAsUsual (talk) 18:59, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger with [[University of Hull]]
Talk:Leibler Yavneh College

message: Please read Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:Reliable sources. This page has been marked as missing citations since 2014, and still contains no citations. I've left a small amount of uncontroversial claims so as not to completely gut the article. The content that has been removed is still in the article history and can be restored, but the claims must be cited.  Tambor de Tocino (talk) 10:11, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, don't cite the articles claims to the subject of the article. Secondary sources are really what we are looking for. If the article remains as is I'll nominate it for deletion in 12months as it contains no citations to reliable sources. Tambor de Tocino (talk) 10:15, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  total absence of citations
Talk:Stronger (Kate Ryan album)

message: This is an automated message regarding an image used on this page. The image :File:2004.Stronger.jpg, found on :Stronger (Kate Ryan album), has been nominated for deletion because it does not meet Wikipedia image policy. Please see the image description page for more details. If this message was sent in error (that is, the image is not up for deletion, or was left on the wrong talk page), please contact this bot's operator.  STBotI (talk) 18:05, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: An image on this page may be deleted
File talk:Adolf Hitler cph 3a48970.jpg

message: This is quite a flattering portrait of the Reichsfuehrer, some indication of when and how it was originally produced would be interesting. Lycurgus 14:07, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Reichsparteitag 1934. Look at this, 0:25:36 nd you'll see exactly the same picture.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.230.133.98 (talk) 22:17, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Provenance?

message: The image repairs were done with great care to avoid loss of details. They are primary cleanup of "white noise" and improvements in tone, not contrast. Latest Adobe Photoshop CS5 tools. --DIREKTOR (TALK) 02:38, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Image repairs
Talk:The Fighting Gringo (1917 film)

message: Is there any source that says John Ford is the director of the film? Silent Era and IMDb say nothing about Ford. And the sources I manage do not include this title in Ford's filmography.--Chamarasca (talk) 00:03, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I've changed it. Thanks for spoting it. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 11:22, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Directed by John Ford?
Talk:The Essential Anna Vissi

message: This article is one in a series that has been subjected to disruptive editing for several months. Accordingly, it has been semi-protected for a like term. Logged in contributors who have been autoconfirmed are still able to edit the article. If you are not registered or autoconfirmed, you can still request that an edit be made to this article at this talk page. If the talk page is not active, you can place  (brackets and all) next to your suggestion, and another editor will soon review your request. See Wikipedia:Protection policy for more information. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 21:40, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article protected
Talk:East Indian Defence

message: Could someone please confirm the main statement of this article, i.e. the position after 1.d4 Nf6 2.Nf3 g6 is called "East Indian Defence" ? I have looked on Google, in Gallagher's Beating Anti-King's Indians and in Golubev's Understanding the King's Indian but I have not find confirmation of that. Has someone a relevant source about this name ? SyG 18:50, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Here are a few links confirming it:  and  and . Voorlandt 18:54, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the links Voorlandt! I will add one in the article as a reference. SyG 22:27, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: All of the links quoted above are dead. "East Indian Defence" is not found in any authoritative source on opening nomenclature. Besides the Oxford Companion and online databases, I can't find a single source that uses this term. In addition, the opening has no independent significance and would not satisfy WP:GNG anyway. Propose merging to Indian Defence. Cobblet (talk) 01:57, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: 2017 and still not notable. Should be merged. 2001:470:C328:1:0:0:1:A23E (talk) 16:14, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confirmation of existence
Talk:Huawei E220

message: Note that this is the 1st version of the article still lacking sources etc.  I'll improve it later. NerdyNSK 14:26, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

message: I've found that I get much better reception from my E220 when it is in a vertical position. It took me a while to figure this out, but now that I know I thought I'd share this "nugget" with the world (or at least some wikipedians). And here's another nugget: a handy way to put the E220 in a vertical position is to just hang it over the edge of the desk!. --Trounce (talk) 14:08, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Better reception when its vertical

message: The sentence appears to suggest that the sim-lock depends only on the included software, but this article appears to contradict that and mentions removing a hardware sim-lock in the device itself while using OS X. Anyone know for sure? Towel401 (talk) 03:19, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Dubious

message: I have never heard or seen this referred to as soap-on-a-rope. I've tagged it as Citation Needed, but if it can't be cited I say that line should be removed. --Jonnymoblin (talk) 19:01, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Soap on a rope?

message: Should Saunalahti be mentioned, given they're a part of Elisa? 62.106.53.238 (talk) 03:26, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: brand still exists --Sigmundur (talk) 16:51, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Saunalahti 

message: Please note the thread I initiated at 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Bluetooth_profile#SIM_access_profiles_.28SAP.29:_Why_no_.2AHSPA_modem.2A_access_.3F.21 .
In other words, it is number 16 there, showing the title above.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.32.33.163 (talk) 12:16, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:   SIM access profiles (SAP): Why no *HSPA modem* access ?! 
Talk:Onondaga County War Memorial

message: Is this exactly the same site as War Memorial at Oncenter?  Perhaps that article should be edited to include the NRHP information instead.  Or is there a need for this article under the site's historic name. doncram 14:33, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Separate identity

message: Can someone take pictures of the beautiful war memorial panels on the outside? doncram 14:33, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Photos Needed
Talk:Gridley Building

message: A new digital photo, and old photos, are needed! doncram 14:38, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo needed

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources.  Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  💵Money💵emoji💵💸 12:25, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Birmingham Polytechnic

message: I don't think it should be merged with the BCU article, there should be a separate historical article on the poly else it might be overwhelmed with the much greater amount of content about UCE/BCU trash80 (talk) 10:39, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have to disagree. There is not enough information regarding the polytechnic to be worthwhile for a separate article. It should be merged.Bodrules (talk) 05:27, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Why don't we try and get some more information then? --trash80 (talk) 22:27, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a lot more information that has been added within the past few months. I think it now deserves it own page. I will remove the stub of both pages.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bodrules (talk • contribs) 13:45, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: yeah i have been trawling the newspaper archives :) --trash80 (talk) 10:09, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Bruch's membrane

message: There are a lot of technical terms here and a picture would help non-medical folk tremendously. Hovea 14:46, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Prepared and added a diagram - no other suitable diagrams found on Wiki or Commons. If more needed, then please reinstate the Anatomical diagram requested. Egmason (talk) 05:27, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Images should be added
Talk:Macropidia

message: Randonmly, i know that it is used in a nice smelling shampoo but cannot remember which one. Maybe this could be included? 147.197.229.130 10:17, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shampoo 