lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Alethiology

message: This term is rare, and the article should not provide the impression that this is an established field. In Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy (10 volumes) it is only mentioned once in the article "Lambert, Johann Heinrich (1728-77)". Quote: "Part Two of the Neues Organon is the ‘Alethiology or Doctrine of Truth’. Lambert’s key concern here is with the nature and function of the simple concepts that serve as the building blocks for the logical construction of true propositions. 
Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Version 1.0, London: Routledge". 195.215.206.245 22:27, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have incorporated this information in the article. Anarchia 21:26, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rarity of term

message: I do not recommend a merging with epistemology, and I do not agree that epistemology can be said to be about "the study of absolute or factual truth". Some epistemological theories are, for example, based on the doctribe of fallibilism according to which there is no absolute truth.
195.215.206.245 22:27, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Merger proposal removed. Anarchia 21:26, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal with epistemology

message: I have some information on the term to add, but I'm not sure how to properly include the proper citation.
Suggested text addition:
The term appears in The Banalization of Nihilism (p.p 17-18, 1992) in contrast to several other types of nihilism, especially epistemological nihilism. The views of several philosophers are then distinqished by reference to 'alethiologicsl nihilism', 'epistemological nihilism' and the like.
Book Title: The banalization of nihilism: Twentieth-century responses to meaninglessness
Pub Year:1992
Publisher: State Univ of New York Press  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Douglasorme (talk • contribs) 18:52, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition
Talk:Ichthyology & Herpetology

message: This journal will be renamed to Ichthyology and Herpetology beginning with the first issue in 2021, because of the racist and sexist views and behavior of its current namesake. (See article in Science Mag). Can this be worked into the article now?—Jchthys 19:38, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renaming to ''Ichthyology and Herpetology''
Template talk:Timeline of Colombian armed conflict

message: RE: 
You said "I tried the same thing.. hehehe.. "
I thought this was refering to changing the template to a hide/show. Which I did, and which you have now reverted.
I am seriously considering adding back everything on the old template and make it a hide/show.  the original template: :Template:Colombia conflict looks better. 
Also you deleted several sections, like the conflict participants, that has not been restored. 
I am concerned about: 
# how you continue to revert any changes I make to your new template, and 
# the lack of any consultation/consensus before beginning to dismantle :Template:Colombia conflict
# the idea of having up to three templates on one page instead of one,
# the lack of astetics to the new templates. 
I like the idea of building one large template, like the World War 2 template you suggested, and removing all three of these templates, but I am a little worried about working together. Travb (talk) 22:50, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes to template
Talk:Musta'arabi Jews

message: The title should be "Musta'arabim" or "Musta'arabi Jews".  "Musta'arabim Jews" does not make sense. --Sir Myles na Gopaleen (the da) (talk) 09:16, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There's been no comment on this, so I shall move the article. --Sir Myles na Gopaleen (the da) (talk) 13:16, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Regarding Mustarabim at Talk:Mustarabim#This article already exists. Tiamuttalk 14:32, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Please see merger discussion

message: This article seems to focus overwhelmingly on the community of Syria, and needs more information about the communities in other countries.  --AFriedman (talk) 02:09, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Undue weight

message: Bassola made a distinction in his description of Jerusalem in the 16th century between Mistaarvim (מסתערבים), whom he also called Morisikim (מוריסקים, Moriscos) and said were "inhabitants of the land since the days of old", and the Maaravyim (מערביים, lit: Westerners) who stem "from Barbary." He did not give a number for their community in Jerusalem, but notes that "four or five" gather together to study. He found twelve households in Nablus, thirty in Kfar Anan, forty in Ein Zaytun, twenty in Sidon and sixty in Damascus. He also mentioned a community in Tripoli. --ארינמל (talk) 22:59, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Distinction

message: Please make this a locked page, or extended. This is a precious page andI do not want it to be vandalized, as a mizrahi jew. 74.71.4.108 (talk) 20:01, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lock
Talk:Cölbe

message: German words don't usually start with C.  Is this pronounced just like it's spelled (kind of like Zölbe)? Reswobslc 22:59, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciation
Talk:Pádraig Ó Cuinn

message: Doesn't an administrator have to remove it? That's my only problem with it. --Counter-revolutionary 23:00, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No. If it's not improved in a month or so nominate it again, but please give articles a chance to grow rather than nominate them within 4 minutes of creation, especially when they are created by new editors. One Night In Hackney303 06:32, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I will do. --Counter-revolutionary 09:09, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: AfD
Talk:San Diego Bay Wine & Food Festival

message: The text, in context, is promotional. It caused the article to emphasize the event producers over the chefs, culinary personalities, participants, history, restaurants, wineries, breweries, distilleries, the scholarship(s), the students involved, or the social, economic and environmental impacts of the event. The event producers may well merit mention in Wikipedia, but that should be on their own page. This article should be about the festival. The text I removed was subtly promotional but it was promotional nonetheless. Oona Wikiwalker (talk) 18:20, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why I removed the Production section
Talk:Bellevue State Park (Delaware)

message: This is an edited comment exchange moved here as it was applicable (I removed the things not pertaining to the park itself):
... BELLEVUE STATE PARK IS IN WILMINGTON, DELAWARE NOT NEW CASTLE, DELAWARE. EVEN THOUGH I LIVE IN ILLINOIS, I HAVE RELATIVES IN WILMINGTON SO I'VE BEEN TO THIS PARK MANY TIMES!!!! ... Chugga (talk) 16:55, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Dear Chugga, ... the article says the park is in New Castle County, Delaware (which is true), not the city of New Castle, Delaware (which it is not, as you so loudly pointed out above). The USGS GNIS entry for the park shows the county it is in as New Castle here. USGS topographic maps show the park and the two lakes here, northeast of Wilmington. The US Census map service shows the same two lakes in its maps and clearly they are outside of the political boundaries of the city of Wilmington and the town of Bellefonte, see here. The postal address of the park is Wilmington, but as far as the political jurisdiction, it appears to be unincorporated New Castle County. ... Thanks for ... your interest in this park, Ruhrfisch  ><>°° 19:32, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

text: Thanks Choess, I prefer either of your formulations to my awkward "Wilmington mailing address", but want to see what Chugga and others think before making another change. Ruhrfisch  ><>°° 20:05, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree first that there is no dispute that the park is outside of the official city limits.  I also find the sentence about having a Wilmington mailing address to be awkward.  I think the best solution would be something along the lines of "Bellevue State Park is a 328 acre (1.33 km²) Delaware state park near the city of Wilmington in New Castle County, Delaware in the United States."  VerruckteDan (talk) 19:21, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks Dan, I switched it to "... Delaware state park in the suburbs of Wilmington in New Castle County, Delaware in the United States." and also switched over the  template. Ruhrfisch  ><>°° 02:39, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location question 
Talk:I-4/Selmon Expressway Connector

message: --NE2 08:30, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who paid for it? Who do tolls go to? 
Talk:Misgav Am

message: Although there are plenty of sources saying that this place was founded in November 1945, it was not listed as a village in the official government village lists of 1946 or 1947, nor did it appear in its present location on maps of the Survey of Palestine or the Survey of Israel until after 1950. The earliest I found was a 1956 map where it appears as a purple overprint that indicates a recent change. The cooperative society "“Misgav ‘Am” Kvutzat Hano’ar Ha'oved Lehityashvut Shitufit Be'eravon Mugbal" was registered on 28 Feb 1946, so the early date is not a fantasy, but either it was initially only on paper, or in a different location, or officially part of some other village. Zerotalk 13:47, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing history
Talk:Heather Ford

message: Heather Ford has written an essay The Missing Wikipedians" in Critical point of View. A Wikipedia Reader", Institute of Network Cultures, Amsterdam 2011. I think this is worth to be mentioned here. --13Peewit (talk) 19:36, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Essay about Wikipedia 

message: Ford is without doubt notable - and gifted, of that there is no question. She has written several publications and papers on the topic of Wikipedia, including her latest release: Writing the Revolution published on 15 November 2022. She gained her PhD from Oxford with her thesis Fact factories: Wikipedia and the power to represent.  Ironically her BLP is incomplete, the sources for some claims link tp opages where she is not mentioned, and some cited sources are to her own social media sites.  Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:02, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Every source except the outdated Oxford profile link from when Ford was a graduate student there, for which archived links exist, mentions her in one way or another, but I agree with the rest of your comment. One of the problem areas is that many sources are very close to the subject, are staff profiles and like you said social media profiles, and trivia like she wrote a post on GlobalVoices. She is notable in her own right, but this article needs to do a better job of showing that. The best opportunities may be in her scholarship and her 2022 book. Saucysalsa30 (talk) 22:32, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources
Talk:Map of lattices

message: I added some desperately needed initial context-setting.  One MUST immediately tell the lay reader who finds this page that mathematics is what it's about.  Mathematicians would know that; others might not, unless it says so. Michael Hardy 23:10, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  context setting 

message: This claim has been under dispute for almost ten years(!) without being resolved or even acknowledged in the article. I've remedied the latter by adding  tags to the article. Robin S (talk) 18:39, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  (May 2017) {{Tl|Disputed}} tags 

message: I'm a student, and I can testify this diagram and the article, and the inclusion proofs below, are an amazingly useful resource for someone trying to learn, study and organize themselves, thanks for doing this, please feel appreciated because your work IS VALUABLE! Please don't delete this article, it's great.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Santropedro (talk • contribs) 17:30, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Great article 
Talk:Lynn Goldsmith

message: This was my first entry in wiki and once I read the guidelines, I changed a good deal of it to comply with your rules and I believe it should remain online.  Should I add more references to where some of the information has come from.   The page no longer follows her bio on her website or from Lexar, but information was gathered from there.
Laurenbullard 23:23, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: After comparing it with the website it was allegedly taken from, I agree & have removed the  warning. It still needs sourcing & referencing, though. —  iridescent (talk to me!) 23:35, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm aware that this is still being worked on, so won't tag it (yet) but it urgently needs reliable sources. —  iridescent (talk to me!) 18:13, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: The statement offering that Ms. Goldsmith's work is "staggering" seems a bit out of line. I don't remember the official terminology Wikipedia uses for this, but the statement seems like fan talk instead of an encyclopedic observation. It's more in the way it's worded as opposed to actual fact as she has had a varied and interesting career. Thoughts?THX1136 (talk) 15:46, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questionable statement 
Talk:Uniform Office Format

message: How does UOF and ODF differ that it is difficult to merge the two formats? It's a nice idea to add into the article. --Kakurady 23:32, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: See this comparison document. 202.78.240.7 (talk) 02:31, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fundamental Differences? 

message: article says:
OpenOffice.org from version 3 can open and save files in "Unified Office Format"...
well mine can't (3.1). can someone please verify and correct the article if you confirm. (feel free to delete my post afterwards)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.244.195.205 (talk) 20:41, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It appears the UOF support hasn't worked since OOo swapped out Saxon for libxslt. And nobody noticed for years - David Gerard (talk) 19:39, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  OOo support? 

message: Is UOF open? Any sources to support this claim in the lede? Alexbrn 13:44, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Open standard 

message: This article is very out of date. The LibreOffice dev mailing list is talking about UOF 2.0 and whether to support it (consensus is "not without a written standard", which they can't find)  . Does anyone have any references from the past five years? (The other language Wikipedia entries don't either.) - David Gerard (talk) 22:33, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Charles-H. Schulz notes "I'm not so sure whether it has any actual traction inside China and I have never even seen an UOF file, ever." Has anyone else? - David Gerard (talk) 11:52, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

text: Found a few government tender documents requiring documentation in GB/T20916-2007, so someone is requiring it ... - David Gerard (talk) 19:33, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: UOF 2.0?
Portal talk:Spaceflight/Next launch

message: What's the right way to handle missile defense tests like this one (from email dated 27 Sep 2007):
:VANDENBERG AIR FORCE BASE, Calif. – The Missile Defense Agency is scheduled to conduct a test of the ground-based interceptor system between 1 and 5 p.m. here Friday. During the evaluation, an interceptor launched from the Ronald W. Reagan Missile Defense Site here will be tested against a target missile, launched from Alaska’s Kodiak Island. The main objective of Friday’s test will be to exercise the operational configuration of the interceptor missile.
Does it involve a spaceflight launch? Or two launches? Or zero? (sdsds - talk) 23:39, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting. This wasn't supposed to be launching until next February. Assuming it is a typical STARS/THAAD mission, then it will involve two missiles, both reaching space. --GW_SimulationsUser Page | Talk 23:43, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

text: I have confirmed that it is STARS/THAAD. 1pm - 5pm PDT will be 21:00 - 01:00 GMT, so we've probably missed it. In future, I would suggest that we list them in the slot that is currently being ued for the Black Brant, with the three launch layout, but that we list both missiles as one entry. What's your opinion? --GW_SimulationsUser Page | Talk 23:49, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, misread your post. Read "Friday" as "today". Add them as soon as we know what's happening with the Black Brant. --GW_SimulationsUser Page | Talk 00:30, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Test has been confirmed a success. --GW_SimulationsUser Page | Talk 22:19, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interceptor missile tests 

message: How about putting a slightly less detailed listing of the next five launches, after the detailed text regarding the next launch. Something like this:
Date/Time (GMT)      	Rocket    	Payload             	Updates	Updates	Updates
2008-04-1420:12-21:12	Atlas V   	ICO G1              	
Image:Icon Text.svg|25px|Text updates
default 
desc none	
Image:Icon Camera.svg|25px|Webcast
default 
desc none	
Image:Icon Clock.svg|25px|Countdown
default 
desc none
2008-04-15           	Pegasus-XL	C/NOFS              	       	       	
2008-04-1822:16-23:23	Ariane 5  	Star One C2Vinasat-1	
Image:Icon Text.svg|25px|Text updates
default 
desc none	
Image:Icon Camera.svg|25px|Webcast
default 
desc none	
2008-04-2405:00      	Zenit-3SLB	AMOS-3              	
Image:Icon Text.svg|25px|Text updates
default 
desc none	
Image:Icon Camera.svg|25px|Webcast
default 
desc none	
2008-04-2622:16:02   	Soyuz-FG  	GIOVE-B             	       	
Image:Icon Camera.svg|25px|Webcast
default 
desc none	
:--GW_SimulationsUser Page | Talk 16:10, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Next five launches
Talk:Garfield Akers

message: Hmmm, "It is an article about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content that does not assert the importance or significance of the subject. ". Two euphoric citations of renowned critics are not enough? Denis Barthel (former known as Denisoliver) 23:57, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:English cricket team in Sri Lanka in 2007–08

message: FOURTH ONE-DAY INTERNATIONAL, Colombo:
Sri Lanka 1584-5 (41.4 overs) v England
Just saw this on BBC website, must be wrong--Liekmudkipz 12:18, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Trowulan

message: First of all, a huge thank you to User:Gunkarta for getting this article off the ground.  Nice work!  Thanks so much for all of your contributions to WPIndonesia! 
I thought I'd raise again the question about Trowulan as the capital city.  There are some books saying just that.  For example: Southeast Asia: From Prehistory to History (Peter S. Bellwood and Ian Glover), p. 251: the ruins at Trowulan are "almost certainly the capital" of Majapahit. I do think there are other books/articles saying that we don't really know what/where is the capital.   
There's the matter of the name.  From what I understand, "Trowulan" is the name of the modern-day village; the capital is usually called Majapahit and/or Bubat, these are the "twin cities."  I've read some debate as to which one was the "capital," per se--that Bubat was where foreigners were received... Anyway, I assume Trowulan is where the ruins of these twin cities are?  OR?  Is there debate about it?  My understanding is that the ruins at Trowulan were pretty badly ruined over the centuries--picked apart by locals looking for treasures, building materials, etc.  Anyway, if we could post up some of the debate here, OR, if it's been pretty well established, let's get that up.   Again, and most importantly: nice job getting this rolling! --Smilo Don 00:40, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Capital Offense 

message: Fascinating article! I've done some copy editing, which I hope hasn't changed the meaning anywhere -- if so, apologies. I've also changed the order of the material in an attempt to gather all the archaeological material into one place, and to make the distinction between the literary & other contemporary sources a little clearer for those who aren't experts. I hope that this hasn't screwed anything up! Espresso Addict 04:04, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy edit and reordering
Category talk:American LGBT rights activists

message: Can we please edit some of the celebrities out of this list? Publicly stating that one supports lgbt rights does not make one an activist. Can we please reserve this category for people who are either primarily known as activists or persons who have SIGNIFIGANTLY contributed to lgbt rights? For example, Cher or Judith Light could be kept on (they have both been actively involved in the lgbt movement), while Tyra Banks (who supports gay rights, but is not involved in activism) would be taken off. This is a list of activists, not pro-gay celebrities.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.13.141.56 (talk) 21:09, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: If you know best you should be bold! and remove them yourself. • Anakin (talk) 07:18, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I know this has been brought up before, but the number of entries in this category make it really unnavigable and most of them have only a tangential connection to LGBT rights. I'm poking around to remove some, but help would be appreciated. I don't think being an actor who makes one PSA or who states an opinion about LGBT rights makes one the sort of activist that people who use the category are looking for. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 18:36, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Round again 

message: Angel Haze: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angel_Haze
They're openly supportive of LGBT+ rights, and they're pan + agender (pronouns: they/them).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.131.122.39 (talk) 04:07, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Someone to add

message: A lot of the people in this category are supportive of LGBT rights, but are not at all activists. JDDJS (talk to me • see what I've done) 04:15, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A lot of people don't belong here. 

message: She has *specifically* stated that she is NOT a transgender activist.
‘I Am Trans But I’m Not a Trans Activist’ 
https://www.rollingstone.com/tv/tv-news/caitlyn-jenner-fox-news-contributor-1330587/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Snowhare (talk • contribs) 07:54, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Caitlyn Jenner Should Be Removed
Talk:Mount Pangasugan

message: "A study by Visayas State University (VSU) in Baybay City, Leyte [1] found many
 animal species listed by the World Conservation Union in the Red List of
 Threatened Animals (IUCN Red List). Species include: the Philippine tarsier,
 Philippine flying fox, Fischer’s pygmy fruit bat, eagle-owl, Philippine
 hawk-eagle, Rufous Lord kingfisher, Philippine leafbird and miniature
 tit-babbler and flying lemur."
I'm actually confused by this paragraph. Supposedly, this article is about the mountain and, taking a cue from the header, is supposed to be about the mountain, but after reading and re-reading it, I wasn't clear if all these animal species were endemic to this mountain. In other words, it wasn't established clear enough.
For this reason, I've tagged it for clean-up. Can additional/better references be incorporated on this article? Or, can this one be rewritten to better state what was intended to be meant here?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Titopao (talk • contribs) 00:42, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I added more authoritative sources on scientific studies in Philippines, funded by foreign funds, and this Mt. is really a habitat to these identified diverse and slightly distributed endangered and rare species.--Florentino floro (talk) 11:57, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing paragraph 
Talk:Oakland Point, Oakland, California

message: The following text was placed unsourced in the article by another editor.  After sourcing this material may be returned to the article:
* "As a result of this isolation, combined with the crack epidemic of the 1980's, crime in the Lower Bottoms rose." Anlace 20:33, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved out of article for the time being