Talk:Margareta of Romania

message: Translation of the pertinent fragment from "Blackberry Juice" (in Romanian), Gandul, June 21, 2006: "Although it is known that some of the rust of the British frigates ended up in the pockets of the royal family of Hohenzollern, the Romanian authorities rushed to muzzle the affair. Because, as a two penny nation, we have groveled so much before a king crushed by history, that after we had "forgiven" him for his father's mistakes, for his flirting with the fascist salute, and for the "Pobeda" order of daddy Stalin, we didn't shy away from calling "highness" even an eater of public funds, through whose veins a blackberry ("duda" in Romanian) juice runs." It is clear that the fragment speaks of that royal family of Hohenzollern to which both Radu Duda and King Michael - who ruled under the Nazis, was decorated by Stalin, and whose father, King Carol II, made the mistakes of giving away Bessarabia, Bucovina, and the NV of Transylvania without a fight - belong: the Romanian royal family. Ergo, it is Princess Margarita's family which is being discussed in the article, not another. Stefanp 23:11, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nice of you to translate for us. The author says the "royal family of Hohenzollern," so if you are using this source you must be precise, even if he is wrong.  M.Dinescu does not say Margarita's family got the money, it is very clear from your translation. AFAIK the Romanian RF seems to get on quite badly with the Hohenzollerns. That she comes from Hohenzollern stock does not lead to the automatic conclusion that "her" family got the money.  Editors must be sensitive when writing biographies of living people and adhere strictly to NPOV and avoid "interpretations" of the sources. Just quote them as precisely as possible.[].Arkadiam 10:25, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The quoted "royal family of Hohenzollern" is only one: the Romanian one, that is Margarita's. The German Hohenzollern forefathers of the Romanian ones are a princely, not a royal house. The only other Hohenzollerns, cousins of the former, who used to rule the German empire, are an imperial house. So there is no POV here about "her" family: these are well-established facts. Parisian2006 06:37, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no "royal family of Hohenzollern" whatsoever. There is a Royal House of Hohenzollern which can be said to describe the Prussian and Romanian royal families. Charles 07:34, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Wrong, for two reasons. 1. There is no Royal House anylonger in either Germany or Romania. The Royal House (see Wikipedia link) is a State institution in a Monarchy. None of the two countries are monarchies, so they don't have any royal houses anylonger. Once the Monarchy overthrown, the Royal House becomes a deposed Royal House or former Royal House or simply a royal family. A royal family can still exist in both extant and non-extant monarchies, since it doesn't imply institutional State functions as a House would. Thus, the author of the article correctly employed the term royal family, which, indeed, continues to exist in Romania, unlike your claim about a non-extant Royal House. If Romania were to become a Monarchy again, only then we could speak legally of a Royal House. 2. The Prussian family is an imperial and royal family, not just royal family. The only royal family is the Romanian one. As about the exact name of each branch, while it's true that the genealogists like to name the Romanian Hohenzollerns and their German princely ancestors from the Swabian branch as "Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen", in order to differentiate them from their imperial Prussian cousins from the Franconian branch, the princes of various branches call themselves simply "von Hohenzollern" (see, for instance, this royalty news report about the H.-S. princes). Michael also styled himself upon his abdication simply "of Hohenzollern" (source 1 and source 2), not "of Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen". Hence, it is correct to call the Romanian royal family either way: "of H." (as the princes do) or "of H.-S." (as the genealogists do). Either way, there is only one royal family, the Romanian one. The other two German families are one princely (the Swabian branch), one both imperial and royal (the Franconian Prussian branch). Stefanp 09:45, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  If there is no longer any royal house then why is it used in this article? Deposed royal houses and former royal houses are still royal houses! Royal Houses are not state institutions... "Hohenzollern" is not a state institution, nor is "Oldenburg", "Wettin", "Wittelsbach", "Bourbon", "Zähringen", "Ascania", you name it... The Prussian family is a royal family. Prussia was not an empire nor were all of the princes of Prussia titled "German Prince" or "Prince of Germany". If is not correct to call the Romanians the so-and-so family of Hohenzollern because that implies territoriality. Like I said, it should be properly amended to read Romanian royal family. In fact, I'm going to do it now. Charles 03:35, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

text: Then let's change it to Roumanian Royal Family! We don't need to perpetuate the sloppiness of others. Charles 03:28, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK. I further removed link left over from the sentence you had just edited out. Stefanp 19:50, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Which "royal family of Hohenzollern"?

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Support as nominator. Morhange (talk) 03:25, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: She is only Crown Princess by virtue of a document issued by King Michael that has no legal status. I will remove the reference in the intro. Gerard von Hebel (talk) 18:24, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Is there an alternative supported by sources?  For "Prince Paul" there is an alternative; what it be here?  Nomoskedasticity (talk) 21:36, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

text: I would be surprised if she has been referred to by sources as anything other than Princess of Romania. We can't just invent names for people. - dwc lr (talk) 17:09, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crown Princess 

message: The article alternately referred to Margareta's paternal grandmother during her old age as "Queen Mother Helen" and as "Princess Helen". After I made the references uniform by eliminating "Princess", a new version was substituted yesterday, "Princess Helen, Queen Mother", which is jarringly confusing to English readers. While she may have been called "Princess Helen" later in life (as Beatrix, Queen of the Netherlands has assumed the style of "Princess Beatrix of the Netherlands" after abdication) the two titles are never combined in official English usage, and I did not find them combined in reliable sources. If anything, the unexplained (because unsourced) and incongruous combination suggests to the encyclopedia's reader an error in the text. Moreover, my use of the shortened form of that title, i.e., "Queen Helen", was also expunged, with the notation that she was never Queen (because Carol II of Romania had renounced his succession rights as crown prince before the death of his father, King Ferdinand in July 1927, so that Helen's six year-old son, Michael, became King, and before Carol took the crown from Michael in June 1930, he was divorced from Helen {June 1928}). Yet according to the chapter on Romania in Valynseele's Les Prétendants aux Trones d'Europe 1967, p. 332, once enthroned King Carol authorised his ex-wife to be known as Her Majesty and "Queen Helen": Both the most authoritative reference on royal and noble titles in English, Burke's, and Badts' Le Petit Gotha agree with Valynseele, styling her as "HM Queen Helen the Queen Mother of Romania". On another point, both sources also give the "name" of King Michael's eldest daughter, the subject of this article, simply as "Margareta" (this article uniformly uses the Romanian variant of the name, pursuant to the Move Request discussion shown above). But in the article's infobox slot for "name", "Crown Princess Margareta, had been inserted, redundantly appearing in the infobox as "Crown Princess Margareta, Crown Princess of Romania, Custodian of the Romanian Crown" (combining, where "name" is called for, a title of pretence as well as a confusing claim to authority since, at this writing, King Michael is still alive and has not officially delegated any dynastic authority he claims to anyone else). Finally, when I added to the article the maiden name of Margareta's mother, Princess Anne of Bourbon-Parma, this was deleted (as was that of her maternal grandmother, Princess Margrethe of Denmark, provided as context for the childhood holidays that Margareta spent in Copenhagen with grandparents who, as members of the deposed House of Bourbon-Parma, never lived in Italy but often dwelt in the grandmother's native country. Identifying the family names of a Queen's mother and grandmother in the body of her bio is usual when both are of royal birth. I have restored names and titles to the article in accordance with standard usage and cited references. FactStraight (talk) 05:43, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Names vs titles 

message: Should we now put in the intro, that she's the disputed pretender to the defunct throne? GoodDay (talk) 15:11, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pretender to the defunct throne 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Princess Margareta of Romania. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://greekwedding.tripod.com/official.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080115031207/http://stiri3.rol.ro/stiri/2006/06/zeama_de_dude.htm to http://stiri3.rol.ro/stiri/2006/06/zeama_de_dude.htm
*Added  tag to http://www.gardianul.ro/2006/06/16/dezvaluiri-c11/bae_sponsor_regal-s80481.html
*Added  tag to http://www.gardianul.ro/2006/06/17/dezvaluiri-c11/principele_duda_coleg_la_colegiul_de_aparare_cu_semnatarul_contractului_cu_bae-s80510.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070527094355/http://www.zf.ro/articol_28580/principesa_margareta__invitata_sa_candideze.html to http://www.zf.ro/articol_28580/principesa_margareta__invitata_sa_candideze.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.familiaregala.ro/news/3397/121/Vizita-la-Roma/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:19, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Margaret's pretense title is Queen of Romania. GoodDay (talk) 17:44, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: It's difficult to discuss that without a source, since WP:BLP covers all pages including talk pages. DrKay (talk) 18:00, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Navbox 

message: Who could have replaced her in the line of succession? Yes, it's moot now, but the words are not the same. See Heir presumptive    --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 21:48, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed the category 'Female heirs apparent'. If her father had had a son, that son would have replaced Margaret in the line of succession. Alekksandr (talk) 20:32, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  why presumptive and not apparent? 

message: Do we need that whole Foreign Relations Section? or at least can we cut all of those lists of Offical visits she been on, welcomed, royal events she's attended, etc. Arg Matey (talk) 22:58, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Foreign relations

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Princess Margareta of Romania. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150706093109/http://future.state.gov/when/timeline/1969_detente/fall_of_communism.html to http://future.state.gov/when/timeline/1969_detente/fall_of_communism.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140516190323/http://pmrt.co.uk/ to http://www.pmrt.co.uk/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160303181523/http://www.fpmr.ro/upload/Raport%20anual%202006.pdf to http://www.fpmr.ro/upload/Raport%20anual%202006.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090402072148/http://www.evz.ro/articole/detalii-articol/538501/PNTCD-cauta-un-Rege/ to http://evz.ro/articole/detalii-articol/538501/PNTCD-cauta-un-Rege/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090706080844/http://www.evz.ro/articole/detalii-articol/623146/Principesa-la-Senat to http://evz.ro/articole/detalii-articol/623146/Principesa-la-Senat/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:20, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified