lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ginormous

message: this is a double redirect that I cannot fix b/c the page is protected - what gives? Tedernst | talk 20:55, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, I don't see any double redirect. The redirect is protected against article re-creation. I don't know the details, but you can ask User:AllyUnion if you want. howcheng  {chat} 18:36, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

message: 
Yet another broken redirect to wiktionary.  Please change the template to    so that this will link. Cool3 (talk) 15:41, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit please

message: Please add
 
to the top of the page.
: Done BethNaught (talk) 14:32, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request January 2016
Talk:Laundry Service: Washed & Dried

message: Improved the previous album? Source that, please. Dave 20:58, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: npov

message: Servicio de lavandería, Laundry Service and Laundry Service: Washed & Dried are different editions of the same recording session.  All three should be merged to one single article. - Oskarg956 07:29, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: this is a re-release, not a compilation album. it should be merged with Laundry Service. Stopitplease92 00:24, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Compilation album???
Talk:Things to Do in Denver When You're Dead

message: this plot section is very badly wrote, it's too confused. Also notice that it's very similar to IMDB's one, so one of them has surely copied the other (or the original author is the same for both). ---- Lo'oris (talk) 18:21, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot 

message: How was this film received by critics? How did it do at the box office? The infobox says it grossed only half a million, on a $8 budget. Is this true and what's the source? Does it stand up these days or did it grow in popularity after an initial flop? I've heard people talk about it and seen it on TV in the last few years. Any information that could go in the article would be very welcome. Beorhtwulf (talk) 21:53, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The way the article is currently written, it says that the movie was met with bad reviews and cites Rotten Tomatoes as the source. But the Rotten Tomatoes listing for the movie lists that there is no consensus and that 73% of the audience liked it. That's an unusual split between audiences and critics and it leaves me feeling that a conclusion is being reached here without enough research. Since we're talking about a movie that debuted in 1995, years before Rotten Tomatoes, it might not be the best source for what the critical reaction was at it's release. Are there more current to the time sources that we can draw upon rather than just using Rotten Tomatoes as a definitive source? beanlynch (talk) 16:42, 01 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I have incorporated the audience rating and put a  on the financials. Beorhtwulf (talk) 12:24, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  WP:UGC Rotten Tomatoes audience scores are not allowed and should not have been added to the article. -- 109.79.73.200 (talk) 21:40, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Critical reception 

message: I removed the description of Critical Bill as a "psychopath" because a) it wasn't sourced and b) there wasn't any indication in the film that he had antisocial personality disorder (please don't bring up Hare et al.), although some of his behavior certainly was antisocial. Attys (talk) 04:24, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Anyone else who believes that blowing off steam by pummeling corpses seems like anything else than psychopathic behaviour? Even the guy himself blames Jimmy, who should have known better: ″everybody knows... I'm out of my tits″ and openly admits ″I'm in the back of beyond″ --Furescht (talk) 15:08, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Critical Bill 

message: The article says that the Zevon song plays during the end credits - it doesn't. What gives?
:Good point. Doctorhawkes (talk) 06:56, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm assuming they couldn't license the song for the home video release, but afaik no one has published anything about it, so there are no sources. Faithfulruslan (talk) 23:17, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zevon
Talk:Dead Again

message: The plot summary currently only tells about half of the movie; the current last line is more of a tagline, and should be replaced with the second half of the movie. Boter 00:27, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot Summary Expansion 

message: Happy we've all decided to adhere to the Manual of Style, but can somebody besides me now actually start contributing viable information on the film itself? You know the one, Dead Again.  I may be mistaken, but I think it's an important part of this article. Jg2904 (talk) 20:32, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "You've been a big help. Thanks."
Talk:John Skeffington, 14th Viscount Massereene

message: This one uses both titles publicly - is this a case to incorporate them and have the page at John David Clotworthy Whyte-Melville Foster Skeffington, 14th Viscount Massereene, 7th Viscount Ferrard? Timrollpickering 21:04, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Location
Talk:Foxtail (diaspore)

message: The new title is misleading--the hazardous part is not the raceme. Any suggestions for a more descriptive title?--Curtis Clark 21:07, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article needs to define the term diaspore, a technical word used in the title of the article, within the article, probably in the first paragraph.  --KP Botany (talk) 20:18, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That works well, Curtis.  Also, although it's wikilinked in the first line, I think leaving in the see also to diaspore is appropriate with this article.  --KP Botany (talk) 21:48, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I worked on it some more, somewhat separating the diaspore from grasses called "foxtail";  more separation is needed.  --Una Smith (talk) 00:58, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diaspore 

message: <%@ Page Inherits="Redengine.RCM.Templates.LoadTemplate" %> Is the response to clicking http://www.royalbcmuseum.bc.ca/Natural_History/Plants.aspx?id=293, the first external link at the bottom of the article. Google search implies that the Royal BC Museum site now only exists as an archive.
75.74.16.52 (talk) 19:59, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  external link at bottom is dead  

message: The term foxtail seems to be used as a general term and that might confuse people. The Encyclopædia Britannica says it is in the genera Alopecurus and Setaria of the family Poaceae but I do not know what that means. I assume that that definition excludes some of the plants listed in this article. Sam Tomato (talk) 03:41, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  General or specific term
Talk:Tom Ripley

message: In the paragraph on Tom Ripley's mental status, which discusses whether or not he is accurately portrayed as a psychopath, this sentence is bothersome:
"He has had friendships with many of his victims, particularly Greenleaf, and has later regretted resorting to murder."
Neither of the points in the sentence have anything to do with psychopathy.  Psychopaths are perfectly capable of friendship - even though they typically abuse their friends - and they frequently regret their misdeeds.  I haven't read these novels, but I wonder whether Ripley is portrayed as simply regretful of crimes, which implies that he wishes they hadn't happened for whatever reason, or if Ripley is actually remorseful, which would means he deeply feels sorry for them.  Many psychopaths regret their crimes, but none feel remorse for them. I'll be reading the Ripley novels soon and fixing this paragraph afterward.
--Arkhamite 20:46, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Regret or Remorse?

message: I don't think so, if you listen to the interviews Highsmith gave at the end of her life, she clearly states that Tom Ripley was not gay but simply enjoyed how men lived, played, dressed and acted in general. 72.244.25.254 21:07, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: sexual orientation

message: Is it necessary to state that he escapes every single time in the summary already? Wanting simply to know one bit about the character and being fed the ultimate conclusion to every single novel, is very disappointing. 2001:9E8:E66B:4700:9D81:1C7A:CDB0:98F5 (talk) 18:43, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia's general policy is to not hide spoilers when they're relevant to the sections of the article - but I've made the edits you're suggesting because: the plots for the individual stories are detailed in the paragraphs below where readers expect them to be; because the phrasing of the sentences was too sensational/editorial to be fitting; and because the info is arguably not pertinent enough for the lead paragraph. Bugghost🎤:🐛👻 11:33, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  spoiler in the opening summary.
Talk:List of professional Go tournaments

message: I think that these can be more properly called as "competitions", not "titles".  When we compare the category of "Chess competitions" and the cateogry of "Chess titles", we may find that these Go affairs are more similar to "competitions", not "titles".  They are determined by the competion between players.  The Japanese version of this article is called "棋戦 (囲碁)", and the Chinese version "围棋赛", both of which literally mean "Go competitions".  Can we move this article to "Go competitions", and create a subcategory of "Go competitions" under the categories of "Go" and Competitions?  Thank you very much for your considerations.  --Neo-Jay 21:42, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Titles, or Competitions?

message: I think the pages Go competitions and Go tournaments should not redirect here. What about those notable amateur competitions such as the World Amateur Go Championship? --unkx80 13:20, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Go competitions redirect

message: I'd like to recommend removing the current titleholders from this page.  Copying the information here makes it more likely to become outdated and inaccurate.  I'd suggest just keeping each tournament's page up to date, as well as the various Go templates on who are current title-holders (or competition winners ;) --Steve Kroon 13:26, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good Point. For example Yuta Iyama is not Yudan anymore (according to his page). --79.224.103.252 (talk) 23:04, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

text: I agree with this (old) proposal to stop including the most recent winners / titleholders from this page. Adumbrativus (talk) 02:21, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current titleholders? 

message: Aren't the tournaments mentioned under North America considered amateur tournaments? 89.155.5.253 (talk) 01:55, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  North America professional Go Tournaments?
Talk:Harvey Wippleman

message: Can be found: [[Talk:Bruno Lauer/GA1|Here]}. MPJ-DK (talk) 04:09, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Review

message: How come there's no mention of his wife Karen whom he met during a WWF visit to Scotland and who later appeared alongside him in the USWA as Uptown Karen?  Are they still together? 62.190.148.115 (talk) 13:10, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Karen 
Talk:Leela Naidu

message: I created this page as apart of the Noticeboard for Requested India-Related Articles --Shell 21:30, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Created page

message: Sources saying French:
* Times of India
* Hindustan Times
Sources saying Irish:
* Times of India (again!)
* The Hindu
Jay (talk) 09:14, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Mother French or Irish?

message: There's an obituary in The Independent that might be useful for improving the article: Leela Naidu: Miss India of 1954 who went on to forge a career as an actress with a touch of Western elegance. 81.152.70.211 (talk) 20:23, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Obituary

message: Is it true? Was she Miss India at 14? I feel that the date of birth given here might be wrong.-RaviMy Tea Kadai 12:49, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Miss India in 1954????
Talk:Whitney umbrella

message: The parametric equation is not technically correct as the umbrella should include a handle.
Hence it needs to be defined by its implicit form.
I've copied the old parametric equation below.
----
parametric equations
:x \quad = \quad uv
:y \quad = \quad u
:z \quad= \quad v^2
----
--Pfafrich 21:31, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Swapping x and y just performes an orientation reversing linear transformation on the ambient space. The Whitney umbrella point is an diffeomorphism invariant, i.e. you can take a local diffeomorphism (close to the origin) of the ambient space and still get a Whitney umbrella point. Why was the variable exchange needed? Were the axes labels wrong in the original picture? Declan Davis (talk) 19:25, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Aren't transverse self intersections stable? The Whitney umbrella contains a line of transverse self intersections. Declan Davis (talk) 16:39, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, however they are non-local. The Whitney umbrella is a local singularity mapping an open neighbourhood of a point into an open neighbourhood. A transverse intersection maps a pair of open neighbourhood, into an open neighbourhood. --Salix alba (talk) 23:43, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stable Maps
Talk:Modimolle

message: The Church of Our Lady Mary of Zion in Aksum, Ethiopia dates to the fourth Century AD according to the linked article.
:Can't find citations to the fact in the Modimolle page. I know this church in Modimolle is a Protestant church, perhaps the fact was mangled a bit. Church of Our Lady Mary of Zion sounds Catholic, doesn't it? ObseloV (talk) 07:00, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Church of Our Lady Mary of Zion 

message: I don't get it, how can 5.98% of Modimolle municip. be black, 13% white and the remainder >5%? Thats like 20%? Can someone please fix this. Bezuidenhout (talk) 22:41, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, I made a mistake in updating the Census 2001 data that is mentioned in the Municipality's report. I lost the leading 8. It was 85.98%ObseloV (talk) 09:16, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Demography 

message: It turns out that the Jerusalem Trekkers (aka Jerusalemgangers) did not actually settle the original town. They arrived in the area while under the leadership of Johan Adam Enslin long before the 1860s, and seem to have been at loggerheads with other Voortrekkers in the region. Dutch Reformed clergymen tried to hold services in the area, but the latter were hampered by the Jerusalem Trekkers. Eventually Andries Pretorius also got stuck with them, which resulted in some sort of lawsuit. After Enslin's death in the 1850s, the support for the Jerusalem Trekkers petered out.  Yet, the name they gave to the Mogalakwena river persisted through to the founding of the town on a beautiful part of the southern bank, in 1866. ObseloV (talk) 17:34, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover)  ASUKITE 15:52, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Modimolle →  – Revert premature move to official name, as the WP:COMMONNAME does not appear to have yet followed, per Ngrams and per the lede of the article, which states "commonly known by its original name Nylstroom" BilledMammal (talk) 03:07, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 15 December 2021
Talk:Uttapam

message: I created this page as apart of the Noticeboard for Requested India-Related Articles
P.S. Sorry about all the minor edits. I forgot to use preview and just kept editing. :embarrased: --Shell 21:38, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: shouldn't that's the right name? 80.178.114.234 (talk) 14:59, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: isn't it "Utapam"

message: What's this random "medium-sized" uttapam that has exactly 180 calories?  It's a silly sentence.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.139.223.65 (talk) 18:30, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's an unreferenced vague claim that is meaningless given the sizes and variety of toppings that are possible, so I removed it.  67.101.5.166 (talk) 19:25, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Calories
Talk:Oak Ridge High School (Tennessee)

message: Anyone have any long-term stats on Lady Wildcats basketball?  --Allen 21:40, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Basketball stats 
Template talk:Category-Class

message: Please add . Thanks. Rocket000 21:21, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done --ais523 10:22, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Protected template

message: Please change the link in the if statement to read Category . This fits the convention set by the other X-Class templates. Thanks. Hersfold (t/a/c) 22:26, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Happy‑melon 09:25, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fix link
Talk:Wonosobo Regency

message: I have created the temporary subpage stub article. *drew 21:43, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Queen High

message: ==Films of Eleanor Powell?==
Just for an uncredited bit as dancer in the film? A whole footer template, as if she directed it (films of)! Hoverfish Talk 15:43, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Film templates are supposed to list complete filmographies. To make a judgement call like this would be a violation of WP:NPOV so therefore, yes, it is very appropriate. At a glance people can see that Powell appeared in these films; the articles can indicate the level of her involvement. If it hadn't been decided to ban "Films by Actor" catgeories, this wouldn't have been necessary... 23skidoo 15:53, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --Kateshortforbob talk 18:09, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Pearl City (Boca Raton)

message: The Pearl City entry was begun by someone else, but had typos and inaccuracies in it. I cleaned it up and added that Pearl City was the all-black district of Boca Raton. I also added the Remembering Pearl City book and the weblink to the Boca Raton Historical Society page on Pearl City. I was a volunteer at BRHS a few years ago, so that is how I became familiar with the town, but I am no expert. Two things that really need to be added to this article (1) the laws the black inhabitants of the town were subjected to (curfews, etc.) and (2) when Pearl City was dissolved and Boca Raton was no longer segregated. CClio333 21:53, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: More Elaborate Information
Category talk:United States Highway System

message: I noticed that for articles, only one- and two-digit routes are included, but for categories, there are three-digit routes as well.  Should three-digit route categories be eliminated from here?
Also, shouldn't US 101, as the farthest west route, be listed here? DandyDan2007 (talk) 08:50, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this category specifically for one- and two-digit U.S. Routes?
Talk:Last Days of Coney Island

message: Don't be fooled by the last anonymous edit. There has been no casting decisions whatsoever regarding the voices for this film. The voices will not be recorded until the animation is finished. (Sugar Bear 22:07, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Release date

message: Uh...what exactly is the point of the first reference? I don't actually see it mentioned in the text. Broklynite (talk) 02:23, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Coccidioides immitis

message: Not used or explained in article. 86.159.197.174 (talk) 03:19, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why does "coccidioidin" redirect here? 

message: Source 2 no longer links to the intended article/source, and I can not find the intended source. Jkdenton16 (talk) 18:45, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead links in sources 

message: This page lacks any details about the biology of the fungus and instead is content with only medical information. Information about the cellular structure and spore formation is absent 212.34.30.45 (talk) 16:31, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of Biology Information
Talk:Social actions

message: It would appear that there are some sources which confuse rational and instrumental actions, so be careful. Some citations (I don't have any atm) would be useful here.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 22:22, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

message: Following up on Piotr's comments: I think the current state of the article reflects confusion about the distinction between instrumental and value rational action.   In short-- it seems like aspects of both the 'rational action' and instrumental action sections refer to aspects of instrumental action.   The term 'value rational' can be thought of action made according to principle, rather than action made to instrumentally attain some end.  Thus a person might go out of their way to return a library book that they found on the street purely because doing so is consistent with their values.   It would likely be helpful to read Weber's 1968 discussion of value rational again. --Htw3 04:40, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion on value rationality 

message: Yep. That's about it, really. --Tomsega (talk) 12:34, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page name should be 'social action' not 'social actions' 

message: Proposing that this page be moved to Social action (sociology). Meclee (talk) 03:31, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move proposal 
Talk:Anthemius of Tralles

message: I've added the 'cleanup' tag, since much of the wording in this article seems archaic and/or awkward. It could do with a good going-over. --PeruvianLlama(spit) 22:27, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: "his daring plans for the church strikingly displayed at once his knowledge and his ***ignorance***"
I think that this looks too much like vandalism, unless someone can provide a reference for this.Gakrivas (talk) 22:59, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It's from the EB9 and 11 and was cited already. That said, it's not explained and 'seems unnecessary to include it. — LlywelynII 13:48, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Ignorance"? 

message: The article included these
* .
* Procopius, De Aedific, Vol. I, ch. 1.
* Agathias, Hist., Vol. V, ch. 6–9.
* .
* .
* .
* .
but didn't use them for any citations. Kindly reïnclude them as they are used to source various points in the article. — LlywelynII 13:48, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources for article expansion