Talk:Volvo 200 Series

message: Thought it was time to update the orange pic that has been up for months with something that was a little easier on the eyes. Nfjb (talk) 06:10, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope. This is not a calendar, it's an encyclopædia. As such, we do not change images because they've been "up for months", and we don't change them because you happen not to like a high-quality image. The black-car-on-grey-background image you put in is of lower contrast and poorer quality than the image you removed (which has been reinstated). Moreover, the image you put in shows a non-stock vehicle. The modification is minor, to be sure—the park/turn signal lenses are the European type installed on an American-market car—but in the lead infobox, a completely stock vehicle is most appropriate. Please review the relevant standards and guidelines for images in automotive articles. —Scheinwerfermann T·C00:12, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture Update 

message: Just added in the link for Volvo Kalmar Assembly.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nfjb (talk • contribs) 02:25, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Volvo Kalmar Assembly 

message: Coudln't figure out how to add multiple citations. Sorry for the multiple changes. All is well now. Nfjb (talk) 09:35, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding some citations 

message: i can´t find any evidence at all about malaysia producing the 240 after 93 (actually i´m having a hard time finding any reference to malaysian production at all.) unless someone can come up with some reliable proof that the 240 did continue past 1993 i´m going to change the production date of malaysia accordingly - it´s starting th influence the web when ppl come here and see that the 240 was apparently produced past 93...--Lotsofmagnets (talk) 11:48, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  late malaysian production 

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 25 February 2012 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant 
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 12:19, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Volvo 264 GL 1977.jpg Nominated for Deletion

message: I don't see why the Volvo 262C needs a standalone article. The 262C doesn't seem notable enough for such a split, therefore I think it should be merged into the 200 series article.--Kevjgav (talk) 11:45, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 262C 

message: Currently the M46 transmission has a cross-link to a nonexistent page.
It was a four-speed + external overdrive unit.
The underlying transmission design used a Laycock de Normanville Overdrive, which is/was an electrically triggered (Volvo 240 had a square "OD" button on the top-face of the gearshift lever), hydraulic actuated cone-clutch + planetary gear-set. -- http://www.spannerhead.com/2011/10/29/technical-curiositiesthe-laycock-de-normanville-overdrive/ including subsequent comments on that page.
107.203.255.170 (talk) 22:00, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  M46 Transmission