Talk:Religion in Ukraine

message: Forks are generally a bad idea. We have articles for each religion and the material belongs there. 
I could envision the article about the inter-religious interaction but that would have been the article totally different from this one. --Irpen 03:09, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: scope

message: Content related to that of this article is now being discussed at Talk:History_of_Christianity_in_Ukraine. Qe2 (talk) 06:21, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: To conform with consensus reached at Talk:History_of_Christianity_in_Ukraine, I have ordered the listing of Orthodox Churches in Ukraine according to number of adherents, as measured by consistent scientific surveys.  Qe2 (talk) 05:31, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Overlapping Content

message: + Islam_in_Ukraine#Statistics --195.110.6.24 (talk) 12:26, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Religious structure of society 

message: Is there an official (constitutional) religion of Ukraine? --195.110.6.24 (talk) 12:26, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: says no state religion. Ostap 17:10, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official religion 

message: Why is there no section on Hinduism in Ukraine. There is a tiny but  under reported Hindu community in Ukraine in the form of ISCKON and Brahmakumaris
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hinduism_in_Ukraine  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.110.195.51 (talk) 19:37, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hinduism in Ukraine 

message: Found another source of surveys: Romir Ukraine, which is the exclusive representative of  Gallup International in Ukraine.
*2016 end of year survey
*The document on the site for the 2015 end of year survey did not have a table for religion.
*2014 end of year survey
*2013 end of year survey
Note that the survey size is smaller than the Razumkov surveys, and unlike Razumkov only covers urban areas-- Toddy1 (talk) 18:30, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting results. They should be added to the article in a separate table.--Wddan (talk) 10:17, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Romir data

message: I propose to add this version of the pie chart in the lede, which includes the breakdown of the different types of Orthodoxy. This is because there are very deep difference between these various types of Orthodoxy. For instance, the Kyevan Patriarchate, which was founded in 1992, is not considered part of the Eastern Orthodox Church, and the unaffiliated Orthodox could include the non-Christian "Native Orthodox" (Rodnovers). So, lumping all of them together under the label "Eastern Orthodox Church" is wildly erroneous. FrankCesco and Jobas oppose the addition. , , what do you think about it? --Wddan (talk) 15:21, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The above table conflates the two nondenominational answers on page 31 of the source: Просто православний 21.2% and Не знаю 2.0%.  Is "23.7" in the pie-chart is a typographical error?-- Toddy1 (talk) 15:58, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, the table conflates "simply Orthodoxy" and "do not know", and then to reach the 65.4% of total Orthodox I had to add a further 0.5% (evidently, the % are approximate).--Wddan (talk) 16:09, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: There are standard rules for rounding.  To see whether the missing percentage was due to rounding errors, I looked at the data on the breakdown of Orthodox in the May 2016 report (pages 29 and 31) from 2000 to 2016.  Not only was there always a missing percentage, but it was always the same way; i.e. the total of the percentages of different types of orthodox was always less than the total orthodox.  If the missing percentage had been due to rounding errors, then you would have expected the missing percentage to be sometimes positive and sometimes negative.  It is likely that some or all of the missing percentage are due to missing or uncategorised answers.-- Toddy1 (talk) 19:32, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

text: I have added the table above to the article. Besides, have we decided what to do with the pie chart? Is it better for it to show the breakdown of Orthodox people or not?--Wddan (talk) 10:24, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Pie chart with breakdown of Orthodoxy

message: The Razumkov Centre has a footnote in one of its reports on what is included under "Protestants" in their surveys:
:Protestant, including evangelical churches (ie: Seventh Day Adventists, Jehovah's Witnesses, Lutheran, Evangelical Christians and Evangelical Baptists, Christians of Evangelical Pentecostal and other community, Full Gospel Church and other charismatic communities, Mormons)
:протестантських, у т.ч. євангелічних церков (а саме: адвентисти сьомого дня, Свідки Єгови, лютерани, євангельські християни та євангельські християни-баптисти, християни віри євангельської та інші п’ятидесятницькі спільноти, Церква Повного Євангелія та інші харизматичні спільноти, мормони)
-- Toddy1 (talk) 16:34, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Survey results for Protestants 

message: Greek Catholic AKA Ukrainian Greek catholic is a type of roman Catholic. The use of Roman Catholic seems to refer to the Latin Church in this context. I do not know why my editing of this confusing box keeps getting reverted, Whoever is doing so can very easily read up on the subject matter themselves. This is infact wikipedia.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Magjozs (talk • contribs) 03:51, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Religion box 

message: (and whoever else including the IP) Please figure out what the consensus is so the edit war can stop. Thanks. --NeilN talk to me 15:38, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Apologies, , but I've had neither the time nor (predominantly) the inclination to follow through on this. I believe I've laid out my arguments clearly for the removal of one of the pie charts (being the 2016 one), and information in the lead about poorly conducted and incomplete polls. I suspect that the next step is the DRN, but I need to collect my thoughts and construct a terse explanation of the content issues and why the latest sourcing is very misleading. I've only just been jolted into addressing the fact that some form of action is needed by dumbot's removal of the temporary pp. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 21:04, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit war 

message: The Joshua Project is a foreign (American) organisation with an agenda to promote.  It is a ministry of Frontier Ventures, which claims to be an apostolic community committed to a common life and vision.
I suspect that surveys by the Razumkov Centre are more reliable. It is regarded as a top research institute. It is Ukrainian, and its clients are Ukrainian.-- Toddy1 (talk) 21:21, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Joshua Project 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:39, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: Any reason why the religion of Islam in Ukraine was omitted from the pie chart? 176.55.111.251 (talk) 17:42, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems like some editors do not want to see Islam in Ukraine based on petty excuses. I wish they would use the same conditions (WP:SYNTHESIS) on other subjects too. Korybiko (talk) 02:54, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

text: I added Islam in accordance with info from Demographics of Ukraine. Perhaps the whitewashing editors can find more up to date and specific numbers as there is plenty of data out there. Korybiko (talk) 03:15, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Islam in the pie chart