lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:War of Honor

message: Would anyone consider Giancola's tampering with Manticoran-Havenite diplomatic dispatches that ended up precipitating the end of the truce to be analogous with Bismarck's altering of the Ems dispatch? If so, should it be included in the article? -- Cohen the Bavarian 15:01, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't really see how they're all that similar. In WoH Giancola is falsifying communications and lying to both sides during peace talks. The Ems dispatch was a carefully worded press release to lure the French into starting a war. 82.135.7.211 01:47, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ems dispatch analogy? 

message: This book seems to introduce plot elements (genetic slavery, Mesa, Manpower) that are previously developed. However the Honorverse article suggests that these were introduced after the publication of this book. It might be worthwhile to expand the article to explain how this fits in with the slaves sub series. 99.225.180.228 (talk) 04:57, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relation to sub series 

message: I've added the single review listed at ISFDb. Ping User:Cunard, User:Daranios - are you seeing anything else to save this? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:52, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: So, three capsule reviews plus presumably something better at Locus, but offline and currently nearly impossible to verify... sigh. I'll tag it with 'sources exist' for now, but this is pretty borderline :( Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:05, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:List of kyokushin techniques

message: Well i guess we should add obscure techniques more because everyone adds kihon. But the more advanced and the real signature techniques we will add, will be more better.Achintya Bajpai (talk) 15:33, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

message: The techniques here are all techniques I've found in the online terminology at http://www.nkko.no/syllabus_kyokushinkai.asp. I believe there may be some others as well, but here I'm totally clueless. If you know any more techniques, please add them to the list.
Baardie 16:39, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, I think there is. There are already lists for other martial arts, as shotokan and judo, so why not kyokushin karate as well? I was also hoping that someone would create articles for each of the techniques some time, and then we could link to them from here. Baardie 22:46, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is a lot of confusion created by this article. The main Kyokushin kaikan article states that there are three technicques, kihon (basics), kata (forms4and kumite (sparring), while this article gives a totally new list of 1 Tachi (stances), 2 Tsuki (strikes), 3 Keri (kicks), 4 uke (blocks) and 5 Ashi Uke (leg blocks). Without propper reference I don't know where this list is coming from? How do I Merge both articles and finally what is the notability of this list? Can an expert please shed more light on the list and the discrepancy?Wikishagnik (talk) 20:53, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge what?
Talk:Grand potential

message: I can't find many indications of when this is valid, but it appears to be valid for open systems (where particles can flow in and out of an arbitary fixed volume), which are attatched to a heat reservoir. The differential formula may also require particles to be quasi-static,  and possibly a monatomic ideal gas. --H2g2bob 15:06, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Validity Considerations

message: I did my best, but I'm not an expert in this. This really needs someone with better knowledge on this, to clean it up and make it more rigorous, especially with the valididty constraints (my best guesses are above). Are you an expert? Please help out! --H2g2bob 15:19, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs an expert 

message: My background is gravity and high energy physics so black holes are a very important set of non-extensive systems for me. I'm aware of Tsallis and have flipped through a couple of his papers. I haven't been too excited by the work, but I may not have seen the good stuff. With regards to the GCE, have you heard the phrase "Landau potential" used? I seem to remember picking that up from a textbook somewhere but I'm not sure. Joshua Davis 17:25, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Found the reference on "Landau potential" that I was thinking of. The book States of Matter by David Goodstein defines it on page 19 as  \Omega = F- \mu N \,\; where F is the Helmholtz free energy. For homogeneous systems, one obtains  \Omega = -PV \,\;. I don't know if this nomenclature is in widespread use. Joshua Davis 17:06, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes, they seem the same to me. Joshua Davis 21:18, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  GCE and diversions 

message: The internal energy definition uses a summation over μN.  This article does not.  Can someone knowledgeable check if this difference is correct?  David Hollman (Talk) 10:12, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Summation over μN 
Talk:Peter Lee (ice hockey)

message: The external link says "Chester, England", but another source (http://www.lfpress.com/sports/hockey/2010/06/29/14561331.html) says Ellesmere, England. These can't both be correct, but Ellesmere Port (not Ellesmere) is near Chester so that's a possibility. Peter James (talk) 20:39, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Place of birth
Talk:Yuen Long New Town

message: --AP71 18:31, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Magnolia Projects

message: Should this be moved to the official name, C.J. Peete? -- Infrogmation 15:32, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Normally I would say YES, but the Magnolia's infamy is in its name.  It is famous as the Magnolia projects.  Antares33712 20:59, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Colin Hansen

message: Just dropping by various Norwegian Canadian-category articles to see who's in the list.  I know Hansen can be a Norwegian name but it's much more typically Danish; I was surprised to see Rick Hansen in the list as I'd thought he was of Danish extraction.  Same with Colin Hansen here.  Or is Colin both Danish and Norwegian?  and Rick? We could always just ask I supposeSkookum1 15:37, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Danish, Norwegian, or Dano-Norwegian?

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://www.leg.bc.ca/mla/39thParl/hansenC.htm. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:59, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Institute of Management Technology, Nagpur

message: THe recent edits make this article seem more like an advertisement for IMT, Nagpur, which is not what is supposed to be done. Wikipedia is an Online encyclepedia and not a Advertising paper. I request you to kindly consult a few good articles like IIM, Ahmedabad, IMT, Ghaziabad which are articles on the same lines and modify the article accordingly. If this is not done, this article will end up getting a  on it.
:* As pointed out earlier, this article smacks of self promotionism, if there ever such a word. It seems like a advertisement. Statements like Billionaire Industrialist Ratan Tata  are not in spirit of an encyclopedia. History is yet to be corrected. There is no section on Extre curriculur activities. I would request a major clean up.Jordy 15:48, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent Edits 
Talk:The McLaren Building

message: Any source for this assertion? It is very recent to be a listed building and it is not included in Birmingham City Council's schedule of listed buildings  where one would expect to find it if it were listed. Valiantis 15:46, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it doesn't appear to be listed. I've deleted the reference. DWaterson 20:58, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Listed Building?
Talk:Kippen

message: The article currently states "The village lies on the line of an eighteenth-century military road between Stirling and Balloch, although a bypass around the village was built in 1971 meaning Kippen no longer lies on the A811."
Unfortunately this is not quite correct. The FIRST bypass was already very old in 1971 when indeed the SECOND bypass was built on the trackbed of the old railway, as a result of severe weight restrictions placed on the Broich Bridge, which is what was being bypassed this time! There was, and probably still is, something resembling a Bailey bridge superimposed on the old Broich bridge. I know this from memory, even saw the new bypass being built, and suffered serious inconvenience in my first car at the Broich bridge, but the various generations of OS map at maps.nls.uk will confirm it was as I said. The 25000 map around 1960) shows a straight A811 from the crossroads near Kippen station to almost the Broich bridge, exactly as I remember it. That also seems to be true in 1887.
I have not updated this yet, as I would prefer that someone with more complete knowledge of dates etc did it, so that it is finally correct. Was the Broich bridge built especially for the first bypass, and when?
Tiger99 (talk) 20:29, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Village bypass? When? 

message: "The name is believed to come from Scottish Gaelic, ceapan, meaning 'place of the little stump', 'outcrop' or 'block'."  https://www.definitions.net/definition/kippen  Perhaps someone in Scotland has further insight into this?    Heavenlyblue (talk) 18:41, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:Nicholas Worth

message: STub, man, stub ! Doesn't anyone know that this guy worked on Swamp Thing and Dr. No ? Heck, he was even in C&C Firestorm !
*Really if you know that could you say who and what?Jamhaw (talk) 23:00, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have to do my research, but he played a minor role on 'Swamp Thing', mainly as the main henchman of the primary villain. I rememebr him best for being Kolinar Koltrass on Emperor Battle for DUne, though.
He played the role of Bruno in Swamp Thing. Was also in Naked Gun, Blacula, No Way Out, Action Jackson, WKRP in Cincinnatti, Greatest American Hero and several others.
(cancel post)
TheHypnotist 20:24, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Very well. 

message: Seems to me there's not quite enough in the article about DATP.  It was his breakthrough role, after all.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.237.243.185 (talk) 01:17, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: DON'T ANSWER THE PHONE

message: I have added an external link to a YouTube-video of Nicholas Worth's breakthrough-piece Don't Answer the Phone, with a time-specification to start close to the end, which does NOT include nudity; however, other parts of the movie DO include topless women and if the reader clicks on the time-slider, he may see them.  Is this OK?  If not, feel free to remove this link.  It's up to you, masters of the Wikiverse.  HandsomeMrToad (talk) 00:19, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Video link

message: I am adding a sentence to the article: NW was a born-again Christian (hard to believe when you watch his movies!).  With a ref, but you have to click "show more" to see it in the ref.  HandsomeMrToad (talk) 02:38, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  His religion
Talk:Anolis

message: That seems odd. The article could also point out that this ability is the reason some people erroneously call them "chameleons."
:That's covered on Dactyloidae. HCA (talk) 14:52, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Nothing about their ability to change color?

message: Well, i would say the family of the anolis is "iguanidae"
that's all
jojo
"first non-avian replite...". Is that a helpful/meaningful statement? Have the genomes of pterodactyls been fully sequenced?--Nickpheas (talk) 17:43, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: If the information in Polychrotidae is true, then this genus must be the only one inside Dactyloidae -Theklan (talk) 21:46, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to Dactyloidae‎ 

message: The anolis lizard morphological deviation that exist do to habitat differentiation is an important topic that should be covered 
The fertility success of anolis lizards associated with environment conditions would also be an interesting topic to pursue. 
The variability in the locomotion of anolis lizards and how it evolved over time is a topic that I don’t see discussed every often. Would that be something you would consider?   Mohamed.156 (talk) 13:58, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evolution of anolis lizards 

message: Relevant source from 28 July 2015, Ancient lizards in amber amaze scientists 
:"lizards from the Caribbean, preserved for 20 million years in amber, have been found to be identical to their modern cousins"
220 of Borg 02:53, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source 

message: Is the tail of that Anolis lizard broken?  If so, perhaps the picture should be cropped or a new picture should be found.  Myoglobin (talk) 01:39, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 
Talk:Abbas-Ali Amid Zanjani

message: I wanted to clean - but found that the job is really tough. --Bootblack 16:04, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Camp Galil

message: This article is written in a boosterish, ad-like style, obviously by an admirer and supporter of the camp.  It is interesting and informative, but not written like an encylopedia article.  Should this article be improved to conform to Wikipedia style?206.126.92.41 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 15:23, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: By all means fix it. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 22:33, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Centromere

message: di centric chromosome
add it to the searching possibilities
"chromosomes with two functional centromeres (dicentric chromosomes"
allthough it is in the text it is not showing up on the search
--M siterman 16:09, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Does anybody have an idea who first used the term centromere? I have checked in a book from 1906, the term was apparently unknown to the author. --Dietzel65 14:23, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  first usage of "centromere" 

message: The article contains the following:
i think there is an error on this page concerning homologous chromosomes...they do NOT occur in mitosis bu do in meiosis  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.104.128.38 (talk) 01:25, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strange sentence removed from the article. 

message: Can anybody tell me what is the exact size of each centromere in humans and mice?
Thank you.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.124.181.111 (talk) 19:01, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree; the table only lists the size of the centromeres for the first 3 chromosomes; either there should be an explanation of why only the first 3 are significant or data for the rest should be added (unless we have both missed something) Myoglobin (talk) 16:29, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Size of each centromere 

message: Hello . I Added citation for subtelocentric . Thank you.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aishwarya889 (talk • contribs) 22:08, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added citaton for subtelocentric 

message: A recent edit brought up a good question: during cell division, does each centromere have one or two kinetochores?  If there are two (one for each sister chromatid), then the intro should be re-written to make each mention of the kinetochores plural.  Myoglobin (talk) 14:38, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plurality of kinetochores 

message: Reference 5 links to NIH's Genetics Home Reference and an article on sister chromatid cohesion from 2011, but I can't find such an article anymore.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.192.102.252 (talk) 21:39, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken Reference
Talk:National emblem of Azerbaijan

message: This is clearly not a coat of arms.  Where is the shield?  --Daniel C. Boyer 16:23, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Shield

message: The flame looks like the word Allah. Is that just a coincidence?
No, I believe it is not a coincidence and it was intentionally done in that shape by the designer. Unfortunately, I don't have a reference to back this up. Also, most of the people in Azerbaijan don't even know the hidden double meaning behind the shape of the flame, as the Arabic script has not used in Azerbaijan for many decades and people cannot "read" it. 193.164.229.102 11:31, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed that as it sounded excessively like either a coincidence or synthesis. Obviously, if anyone turns up a legitimate source for that, I won't remove it. 68.39.174.238 (talk) 02:43, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed this conspiracy theory once again. Azerbaijani official law makes no mention of the word Allah. Boaqua (talk) 17:22, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flame 

message: The text state: "between each point of the star, there is a smaller eight pointed star found." yet in the image it look like dots.--Marc pasquin (talk) 14:59, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: small stars

message: I thought the current emblem was adopted in 1991. I need the source which says the current emblem was adopted in 1993. We moved to 8.12 (talk) 01:25, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year
Talk:AVAC System

message: Requested move from AVAC System ---> Automated Vacuum Collection System (which should have been listed here with a template; see instructions at Wikipedia:Requested moves) seemed straightforward, and I was making the move but upon googling, I found far far more listings for present title than for full title. Move may not, thus by appropriate.--Fuhghettaboutit 16:25, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Orion Building

message: Currently two articles Orion Tower and Orion Building both referring to the same building. The correct name appears to be Orion Building,   so I suggest merging both articles under this name. Valiantis 16:26, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops. I didn't realise I had created the same article twice. I agree with the merge. - Erebus555 16:34, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: Merged as requested. SilkTork 21:50, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merged
Talk:Orion Tower

message: Currently two articles Orion Tower and Orion Building both referring to the same building. The correct name appears to be Orion Building,   so I suggest merging both articles under this name. Valiantis 16:27, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, should definitely be merged--Ukdan999 21:44, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Biograph Studios

message: Any and all editors are encouraged to supply us with any pertanent information so I may move onto editing more important studio articles. One added personal note, at this point I could care less whether it was the Biograph company or studio facilites that CFI took over. I just like keeping facts straight. I also enjoy collaberating knowledge with others for people to freely access. If some members are this detirmined about proving a small point, even their point, then let it be so. I truly have better things to do, and it has posed some doubt over the purpose of Wikipedia, which to me was to freely contribute and to collaborate with others for the contribution of purposeful knowledge.
Thanks,
--Roger the red 20:20, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I completely agree. Although, I checked it out on all undisputable facts. I am glad I am done with it, it was a headache. You should go to the American Mutoscope and Biograph Company article, and go to "Talk Archives", and see what went on there, it was unbelievable.
--Roger the red 23:11, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Editorial Contributions and Wikipedia

message: As I see this has been resolved. But my opinion is that unless there are verifiable sources that indisputably show ownership, mention that fact in the article. Maybe someone else will see it and know the answer.Eagle talk 05:50, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I completely agree. Although, I checked it out on all undisputable facts. I am glad I am done with it, it was a headache. You should go to the American Mutoscope and Biograph Company article, and go to "Talk Archives", and see what went on there, it was unbelievable.
--Roger the red 23:11, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 3rd opinion

message: On the inclusion "Empire Trust later assigned management of the property to one of its own subsidiaries, The Actinograph Corp., which held it until 1948.[7]", with reference from "Ron Maggliozi, Museum of Modern Art, New York" there is no sourced reference in  print or on the web. Please provide a verifiable source reference and if not, please remove the the inclusion.
Thanks,
--Roger the red 21:27, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Mr. Magliozzi made the statement in an e-mail in April 2006. He can be contacted in the FIlm Dept. at New York's Museum of Modern Art if anyone has any questions. Thanks. — Walloon 21:45, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I notice above that you used correspondence with author Jon Tuska as a source to edit the article ("If verification is needed, the author can be contacted through the publisher McFarland & Company for verification since there was some ambiguity on this"), but then did not list this correspondence with Mr. Tuska in any source note. I'm a believer that even a partial source note is better than none. I am revising the Magliozzi note to include contact information. — Walloon 09:23, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References