lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:C. E. Wynn-Williams

message: The vast majority of the text of this article appears to be a verbatim copy of the entry in the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography  at . Is there any copyright on this that could be violated? --TedColes (talk) 13:06, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It is clear that this does breach OUP's copyright and should be re-written. --TedColes (talk) 17:01, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright 

message: I suggest that this article be renamed "C. E. Wynn-Williams" instead of "Charles Wynn-Williams"   The subject of the article is my late father. He never used the name Charles, and followed a Welsh custom of using the middle name as his personal name.  So my mother and all his relatives called him "Eryl" rather than "Charles".  Like many academics of his generation, his and his scientific colleagues usually referred to each other by last name rather than any given name. But most importantly, all his scientific papers were written under the name "C. E. Wynn-Williams" which is why I suggest that this latter variation become the title for this article.  I might add that my own full name is Charles Gareth Wynn-Williams. Like my father, I never use the name Charles. I am Gareth to my friends and C. G.  Wynn-Williams in my scientific papers (I am Professor of Astronomy at the University of Hawaii. )       Ceres96 (talk) 08:58, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved to the new title (with the old one as a redirect) as suggested. --TedColes (talk) 16:29, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: His mother appears to have been born some four years after him. This is quite unusual.217.155.137.60 (talk) 11:14, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Dates
Talk:One Dove

message: A note on "Transient Truth" - for some unknown reason, the US pressing of Morning Dove White listed this as "(The Transient) Truth". It's always been "Transient Truth" in the UK. The title doesn't appear in the song, so there's no clues to context there. - 86.137.217.54 (talk) 15:30, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:J. B. Jennings

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. --KenWalker | Talk 05:12, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Bill O'Brien (American football)

message: Just to let you know, I recently created the same page at Bill O'Brien (football). But when I saw this page I copied the page I created to this one and redirected Bill O'Brien (football) here. Black Harry (Highlights|Contribs) 03:56, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hi 

message: This page was vandalized on January 6. I'll try to get it back to as close to what it was originally. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pelino2214 (talk • contribs) 03:54, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: I'm hoping to get some sort of consensus on this...in the "Response to sanctions" section, there's a link that currently points to Penn State child sex abuse scandal. An IP editor, in good faith, changed it to Jerry Sandusky/Second Mile sex abuse scandal, which redirects to the prior page. Personally, I feel that the first link is a better description and is more neutral, but the IP disagrees, therefore I thought I'd start a discussion using the Bold, revert, discuss model. Thanks! Go Phightins! 21:24, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Linking Discussion 

message: It appears ESPNs article has changed (http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/10231285/bill-obrien-hired-new-coach-houston-texans).  It originally said it was official today. Dabullzrule (talk) 17:44, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Houston Texans

message: The redirect Coach O'Brien has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Hey man im josh (talk) 01:08, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Coach O'Brien]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Label (Mac OS)

message: This page seems a little rough. For such a generic concept (file label), it seems to focus a lot on a Macintosh operating system--not really enough on the concept of a file label itself. I'm not sure whether it should be marked as a stub, incomplete reference. Just browsing through--not much time to take it on myself right now. Ricojonah 23:36, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Episode 7 (Primeval)

message: Why are unresolved plot details not allowed? --Cuddly Panda 23:39, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Because it has no president in the other pages, because it editorialising, because it leaves the fan-fiction gate open, because it lead to fan-wanking, because the unresolved details are minimal, because the importance of those details is unknown at this point in time, because the acuracy is not Primeval's strong point, Because of the risk of the spin-off series, because the series as yet to begin any type of story arch, because the time travel aspect could end with a Star Trek reset button, because its unneeded. Need I go on? Nubula 17:29, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot

message: The future predator returned.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.245.31.148 (talk) 17:06, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: future predator

message: The creatures are currently being referred to as both Deinonychus and Utahraptor. They do appear to be similar in appearance, but are classed as different species. Which is the correct one? There were no arm feathers shown. GuanoLad (talk) 03:34, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I say stay with Deinonychus. That's what the official site says. Nubula (talk) 11:37, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Deinonychus or Utahraptor?
Talk:Turcot Interchange

message: I made a quick edit to mention the planned demolition of the Turcot interchange, but more information could (and should) be posted. There's a wealth of information available publically on the MTQ web site. If someone has the time, do give it a look. Cataclaw 23:49, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Can someone include a picture of the interchange so we can see what taxpayer's money is being spent on? Pendragon39 15:02, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've been looking for ages and all I found is some very high level graphics without enough detail. Added links and corrected links where I could. Jefferythomas (talk) 06:02, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Demolition and reconstruction 

message: Perhaps there should be a section on the mounting cost of the Turcot interchange reconstruction. In 2007 the budget was around 1.54 billion. Then in 2012 the final plan was for 3 billion then later 3.7 billion. JefferyThomas talk 02:30, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Costs of reconstruction
Talk:Pretty Little Liars (book series)

message: The overview should be changed to include no spoilers as it is in the beggining of the article or atleast have a spoiler alert at the top of it. It tells who "A" was.
Cristina.lisette (talk) 11:26, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overview:Spoilers  

message: At first of the article, it says "The novels explore several serious issues such as bullying, murder, drug addiction, underage drinking, eating disorders, homosexuality, peer-pressure, infidelity, and mental illness." I'm pleased that the term homosexuality is categorized here as a problem along with mental illness. It's the only thing in the list that is morally appauling.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.50.129.113 (talk) 02:16, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Homosexuality 

message: Started out as a typo; 
08:41, 05 November 2015
:Courtney is really Alison in the books.  
17:41, 29 June 2017
:Courtney is really Charlotte in the books.  
22:15, 20 September 2018
:Alison is really Courtney in the books.  
This one has the InWanted typo that made me check. I haven’t read the book or seen the show.
NB: all above by IP addresses. 
MBG02 (talk) 00:45, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: PS I wanted to capitalise the little in the Pretty little Liars in the Overview; but that’s been that way since c2011. Is it correct?  MBG02 (talk) 00:52, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Read the book?
Talk:Sesqui 1990

message: Does anyone out ,there remember the tv ad jingle for Sesqui, so memorable.. "Sesqui 1990..is going to be the best."
Does anyone know the FULL "Sesqui" dictionary definition that appeared on piss-take t-shirts afterwards? … Think it included: “Sesqui: n. an unmitigated disaster, and “to give someone a jolly good sesquiing“ etc ... Does anyone have a picture of the t-shirt?124.197.41.118 (talk) 20:16, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Starship Enterprise/sandbox

message: Ok this a couple of quotes from a memo that GR wrote (I think from a copyright perpective it's a big dodgy for me to type out the whole thing - it's entitled 'Noah's arc' it's from pg 15 of the tribute book -  
there is one element which I always felt was lacking in our original series. although our ship was engaged in a 'five year mission', there were only  crew members aboard. For the new series, we are postulating travel through space that could last for an even longer period of time. To expect people to leave everyone and everything they hold dear for such a long journey is, I think, unconscionable. why should the enterprise crew be denied the opportunity  to live a full and rewarding life? therefore I propose that we have men, women and children on board throughout the whole series. 
later 
what we would have then is, ideed, "wagon train to the stars".
and 
This new approach to to STAR TREK would give us much the same sort of dramatic continuity that current shows like 'hill street blues" and "L.A. Law" have. 
So it's helpful to establish how the 1701-D was used to change some of the elements of the show? --Fredrick day 00:02, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Memo dated 17th october 1986 

message: From page 218 of the tribute book 
The Starship Excelsior model, designed by bill george and built by ILM for Star Trek III. to transform this ship into the the enterprise-b for generations, a flare was added to the lower hull, creating a section that could show thw damage caused by the nexus without actually cutting into the original model --Fredrick day 00:08, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Excelsior model used for generations 

message: pg 237 of the tribute book another essential component of a star trek story laid out by Gene Roddenberry is that the enterprise must be considered a character,too.' --Fredrick day 00:12, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Enterprise as character 

message: pg 16 of the tribute book after designing the new enterprise to be an "organic whole," Probert was given an additional challenge when he was informed that this Enterprise would be shown seperating --Fredrick day 00:17, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Enterprise D designed as single unit
Talk:Third place playoff

message: " In the 1994 World Cup, the Sweden national football team branded the game as "the bronze match" "
This is rubbish. The match for third place in any tournament in any sport at any level where medals are distributed has ALWAYS been called "the bronze match" in Sweden.
Please take it out as it is some none-true personal reflection.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.96.185.201 (talk) 13:55, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think that that makes the statement untrue; if the third place match is always referred to as "The Bronze Match" then that would make the 1994 World Cup playoff qualify for the same name, right? JaeDyWolf ~ Baka-San (talk) 14:33, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

text: The text, as it stands, makes anyone who doesn't know the truth think that the term _was coined_ on that occassion which is totally not so. The text says "branded the game as "the bronze match" ", which is a outright lie, the match was simply called the bronze game as always, there was no branding. And very especially, it is not something for Wikipedia to mention. What Wikipedia can do is write that Sweden and Croatia are examples of teams who took their respective bronze games seriously.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.96.185.201 (talk) 14:41, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: 1994 World Cup "The Bronze Match"

message: It should probably be noted that the last NCAA basketball consolation game was in 1980.  One was scheduled for the 1981 tournament, but there was the assassination attempt on Reagan the same day as the final two games, and the third place game was canceled.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.71.17.213 (talk) 16:44, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  NCAA Consolation Game
Talk:Brian Daboll

message: Brian Daboll’s hometown, Welland, is not a suburb of Niagara Falls. In fact, Wellanders would be offended, as Niagara Falls is considered a tourist city, and Welland is a working class town that was greatly affected by the 2008 Economic Recession. Please remove this. 173.238.98.196 (talk) 22:05, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hometown
Talk:History of the World (board game)

message: Article probably needs to describe what the gameplay is like within each epoch - I'm intrigued by this game but I don't know quite what it is yet ;) Playclever (talk) 22:14, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gameplay? 

message: I've trimmed the epochs- WP isn't an instruction manual, maybe brief component listings are needed in wargame articles, but this is WP:INDISCRIMINATE and perfect example of what WP is not. VickKiang (talk) 03:47, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:BOLD]] trim
Talk:Somewhere Out There (An American Tail song)

message: I've removed a section out of the lead that compares "Somewhere out there" to a tune by Beethoven.  The section was sourced to to youtube videos, one of "Somewhere out there"  the second one was  of the Beethoven tune.    The section stated that the two songs were similar but the arrangement of somewhere out there created something new.
That seems to be a violation of  synth  as it suggests something the youtube videos themselves do not.
It may also border on  Original research.   Please discuss before returning that section back in.   KoshVorlon. We are all Kosh ...  15:45, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sonata Pathétique 

message: The following info has been repeatedly inserted into the article's lead paragraph:
* "The melody of the song is that of the second movement of Beethoven's 8th Sonata."
* A link to a Youtube video of Beethoven's Sonata "Pathétique" (#8 c minor, op. 13, 2nd movement: adagio cantabile) is added as a reference.
There are no acceptable sources cited for the inserted info per WP:VERIFY, and appears to be WP:OR and WP:SYNTH. 
This information has been inserted--and reverted--three times so far:
* User DigbyDalton added the same claim + youtube vid twice (#1: 2012; and #3: 2017).
* IP user 50.70.180.250 added the same claim (minus the youtube link) once (#2: 2014).
1st instance, Feb 2012, by DigbyDalton:
:12:49 25 Feb 2012 - diff  #1, DigbyDalton
:>>Reverted and noted on talk page by KoshVorlon (see section "Sonata Pathétique" above) on 10:40, 14 February 2013 - reversion #1
2nd instance, May 2014, by IP: 50.70.180.250:
:08:48, 16 May 2014 - diff  #2, 50.70.180.250 - unsourced claim only
:>>Reverted and noted on talk page by Cherrylimerickey (see section "Sonata Pathétique" above) on 15:47, 31 May 2014 - reversion #2
3rd instance, Dec 2017, by Digby Dalton (in 2 edits - more difficult to remove):
:02:20 8 Dec 2017 - diff #3a, DigbyDalton - added unsourced claim
:02:25 8 Dec 2017 - diff #3b, DigbyDalton - added youtube link
:>>Reverted by Big universe on  00:41, 21 December 2017 - reversion #3a - youtube
:>>Reverted by Big universe on  00:44, 21 December 2017 - reversion #3b - claim
Notes: 
* This is not likely to be linkspam, since the youtube links are different. 
* The IP user's last activity was in 2014, shortly after their edit on this article's page was reverted; total activity spanned a little over a year.
* This info should only be added again if and only if one or more reliable source(s) are also added. This does not include youtube videos, the inclusion of which would be WP:SYNTH.
Cheers, Big universe (talk) 00:42, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: 3rd time - Beethoven claim + youtube reference added

message: Somewhere Out There (James Horner) →  – as Horner is not the sole songwriter. It’s more known as the song from the film as opposed to Horner by himself. Rusted AutoParts 17:43, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move March 1, 2020
Talk:Two House theology

message: Regarding the edit I made today galut5 00:33, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

message: Why is there so many paragraphs about the self proclaimed messianic movement ? This movement is rejected by absolutely all jewish organisations, as well as the State of Israel and the Roman Catholic Church. The article should spend more time describing the traditionnal point of view (because its the main source for the origins of the lost tribes) and less about a sect that nobody takes seriously in order to respect the Neutral Point Of View of Wikipedia :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:NPOV#Undue_weight :
NPOV says that the article should fairly represent all significant viewpoints that have been published by a reliable source, and should do so in proportion to the prominence of each. Now an important qualification: Articles that compare views should not give minority views as much or as detailed a description as more popular views, and may not include tiny-minority views at all. For example, the article on the Earth only very briefly refers to the Flat Earth theory, a view of a distinct minority.
--Squallgreg 09:33, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: agreed. I placed a NPOV tag on the article. It needs considerable checking.   DGG ( talk ) 04:17, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article needs serious work 

message: I think that this article should not be deleted. It is a point of view about the interpretations of the return of the lost tribes that is described in Isaiah 11:10-13. The fact that some groups reject some part of the hypotesys does not means that it has no significance, the reject is not unanimous in any of view considering that in the article we have many sources of authors from many diferent religions and is a very old discussion and now a days we have many parts that defends this theory.
The theory is actually big and does not have a full concern between all groups that defends it, but the main source is very concerning.
Regards
Fabio Asato  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fasato (talk • contribs) 00:39, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  It should not be deleted
Talk:Joe Soap

message: I've cut down the stuff about the Eagle comic strip and removed the associated templates and categories as this page is clearly more about the general phrase rather than the comic strip. I'm aware lists of "in popular culture" are out of vogue, but there we go. Co-opting this page and pretending it's about the comic strip seems counter-productive; if anyone wants to I'd suggest creating Joe Soap (comics) for that purpose. I have however copied some of the content to List of Eagle (1982 comic) stories#Joe Soap in the meantime. BoomboxTestarossa (talk) 20:45, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Joe Soap the comic
Talk:Austin H. Kiplinger

message: I have reclassified this article as a start. Capitalistroadster (talk) 00:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Reclassified as start
Talk:Alternatives to car use

message: Not to be insulting, but this article kind of stinks.  I stumbled accross it and couldn't help reformatting some, maybe in the hope that easier formatting means easier understanding means less driving.  Probably a stretch.  Anyway, when I say it stinks, I include my edits as well.  I hope somebody else finds this and decides its worth some additional effort.  It's certainly better than fixing articles on, umm, belt buckles. Envirocorrector 00:38, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: And it still stinks.  For example, sharing automobiles is not an alternative to automobiles. - Jason A. Quest (talk) 03:43, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:John Torrington

message: This article has a number of problems with its references -- some do not, I feel, come from what WP considers reliable sources --  "Mummy Tombs" and  "Find a Grave" in particular. The  WP main entry on Franklin's lost expedition contains a good bibliography, which can and should be used to source the details on Torrington's career.  I'll work on this much as I can.
I've linked the first sentence of the "Northwest Passage Expedition" to this main entry, and deleted the reference to the number of men.  It would be misleading, in any case, to say how many men sailed from Greenhithe -- 134 -- since five of these men were invalided and sent back from Greenland, and only 129 men (Franklin included) actually were on the expedition.
I do want to do what I can to make this article accurate and complete; the photograph of Torrington's grave here was taken by me in April of 2004, and I'm the author of the biography of Franklin on the Elisha Kent Kane Society's website, which is among the references here.
Clevelander96 (talk) 12:52, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problems with references, cleanup 

message: It would be very interesting to put the ice mummy picture.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.168.223.232 (talk) 09:43, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ice mummy pictures? 
Talk:London Terrorist Plot

message: Um, this should be a redirect, or at the very least a disambig. Alcemáe T • C 00:58, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, it really shouldn't be an article. So unless someone objects, I'm going to make it a redirect. Alcemáe T • C 02:01, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Computer Warrior

message: Either I forgot to grab a stack of New Eagles from storage or I've lost a ton somewhere; will have a look when I'm pulling Scream, Wildcat and the Dork Age titles this weekend. As it stands my memory isn't sharp enough to line up where some of the overarching plots started and ended, so the attribution is a fudge. BoomboxTestarossa (talk) 15:12, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot summary