lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Royal Library, Denmark

message: The title of this collection really ought to be Royal Danish Library in reference to the English language naming conventions of royally priviledged institutions in Denmark (and many other monarchies), cf Royal Danish Navy. For this reason, I have moved the article to its current location. --Eculeus (talk) 21:03, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Why is this page not mentioned on the disambiguation for Black Diamond? Gingerblokey 11:26, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Why should it? If relevant - add it yourself! Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 13:12, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I can not find anything in the source. Please, say page number or help me to find figures with text fragment. I need this figures for List of largest libraries (and ru:Список крупнейших библиотек мира).--SEA99 (talk) 21:20, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Document for 2012 is better. All figures were found.--SEA99 (talk) 07:56, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  All figures in the box ...
Talk:South Windsor, Connecticut

message: Does anyone have a clear definition of the boundary's of the East Windsor Hill Historic District?  It's listed twice and has two different definitions.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dbroer (talk • contribs) 19:42, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historic Districts 

message: There's a giant gap on the front page.  Personally, I don't know enough about Wiki-code to fix it, but I want to bring it to the attention of fellow Wikipedians. --Ipeters61 (talk) 03:56, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Giant Gap
Talk:Lisa's sax solo gags on The Simpsons

message: This article could be dead interesting do musicians. I'll put a rewrite on the top of my list! Mütze 21:29, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I always was a bit curious if the lines she was playing were references to something; the current page doesn't exactly answer any questions though. I'd love it if whoever rewrites this could do something in that direction, or at the least, get sound clips of the different lines she plays.--Charibdis 17:52, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I have now transcribed almost all solos and have the images ready to go. For personal use, I have saved the individual solos as digital audio files, but I am not sure if it would be legal to upload them to Wikipedia. Maybe as MIDI? — Mütze 19:28, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

message: I've added a citation to snpp.com, and removed some of the speculation in the article as to the reasons. If anyone wants to add that speculation back in, please cite its origins carefully. -Harmil 16:45, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I am currently preparing a major rewrite of the article, stay tuned for interesting stuff. :-D Mütze 16:58, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations 

message: Shouldn't this be "Sax solo gag" to go along with "Chalkboard gag" and "Couch gag"?
    Yeah, I agree, I will change it.--MMSH987 16:26, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: Shouldn't this now redirect to Sax solo gag? Cheers to 2007! User:Sp3000 11:02, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  #REDIRECT [[Sax solo gag]] 

message: *In "Moaning Lisa" Lisa plays a bebop instead of _______
What was that song called? Cheers to 2007! User:Sp3000 22:24, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sax solo gags in the episodes
Talk:Carolina Forest, South Carolina

message: There seems to be a lot of vandalism on the Carolina Forest page, as well as the lack of a neutral point of view. It seems to be coming from User:24.211.59.174.
I've taken out some of the text, including the following:
* Most Foresters worship Satan.
* Carolina Forest is still not a great high school.
* The mascot is a panther, a very unorignal mascot or some unorignal people.
* Mental centers are popular in Carolina Forest because a lot of people have mental problems.
This information is not appropriate to Wikipedia, as the encyclopedia in itself is meant to have a neutral point of view, without vandalism.
--Isipeoria 21:31, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism
Talk:Suslin's problem

message: How could he pose the problem in early 1920s? Acording to his biography he died in 1919. Glivi 17:58, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, a real mathematician doesn't let a little thing like death get in the way of his research. But if you can get more reliable dates, either for this article or the bio (or both), that would be a welcome addition. --Trovatore 00:57, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

message: At present we have 'the order on R is complete, in the sense that every non-empty bounded subset has a supremum and an infimum;'.
This does not state that a non-empty subset bounded above (but not below) has a supremum, and likewise for infimum. This is to my knowledge the definition of completeness with the reals. Chalisque (talk) 11:12, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, the two formulations are easily equivalent, so I doubt we really need to say anything about that. --Trovatore (talk) 15:31, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Completeness of order
Talk:List of Canadian Football League stadiums

message: If anyone has any more tenants that they know about, please add them. 
Also, if you can specify any dates for the former teams, please do that too.
Or do you think that all non-professional teams should simply be removed from the list? --J3wishVulcan 21:38, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Former Tenants 

message: I'm gonna put up a list of former stadiums.--J3wishVulcan 13:26, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Former stadiums 

message: I redid the list to separate the teams that are current into their divisions and placed the former teams into a third category.  I then listed under each team what their former stadiums were.  I felt it very unnecessary to show who else shared the stadium with the CFL team along with the specifics of what kind of turf it has.  If someone needed to know what the field consisted of it shows it on the individual stadium page which all of the stadiums (sans Old Varsity Stadium for the Argos). Let me know if this is suitable or if the old way was preferred.  For reference I did this one the same way I did it for Major League Soccer and for NFL Europa.Pharos04 04:52, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I like it.  Thanks and well done.--J3wishVulcan 21:23, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's still a list, not an article, though. Your edit summary of "Not exactly a list anymore as it is just a table showing all the stadiums" doesn't make much sense: the list is simply in the format of a table like before. heqs 16:31, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  List redone 

message: Seem like the Lions at least early in the season do not open the second deck  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.59.74.167 (talk) 16:27, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: BC Place capacity

message: What part of the current stadium dates to 1908? As I can figure out from wikipedia. North side dates to 1967 and south side to 2014.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.127.56.78 (talk) 15:15, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: TD Place
Talk:Sinéad Morrissey

message: I'm not sure if the comment "She is a popular reader of her work" is at all fitting. So I'm removing it. If I'm missing something, feel free to chuck it back it. It just seems a little too joking for an encyclopaedia article.
I've removed "Most other poets simply read their work and even read it flatly," which is a highly subjective generalisation that has nothing much to do with Sinead Morrissey at all. 193.60.92.148 (talk) 15:00, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Fear Street

message: Shady side is located on the East Coast, being mentioned in one of the Fear Street books.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.129.102.78 (talk) 03:03, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Shady side, the city

message: To anonymous editor, please stop making individual links to novels in Fear Street Cheerleaders.The pages do not exist and the Fear Street Cheerleaders heading serves as a link to the entire series. Thank you in advance for not further vandalizing this page.--Dleav 21:37, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fear Street Cheerleaders 

message: Somebody needs to rewrite some of the individual book pages. They're poorly written. KinseyLOL 21:06, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: All in good time. I'm way over my head in school right now, but when I get time I will definitely target the pages. --Dleav 13:58, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite 

message: how could somebody miss these many books!?!?!?!?!?!?
                1 :Hide and Shriek 
	•	2 : Who's Been Sleeping In My Grave? 
	•	3 : Attack of the Aqua Apes, the 
	•	4 : Nightmare In 3-D 
	•	5 : Stay Away from the Tree house 
	•	6 : Eye of the Fortuneteller, the 
	•	7 : Fright Knight 
	•	8 : Ooze, the 
	•	9 : Revenge of the Shadow People 
	•	10 : Bug man Lives, the 
	•	11 : Boy Who Ate Fear Street, the
	•	12 : Night of the Were cat 
	•	13 : How to Be a Vampire 
	•	14 : Body Switchers From Outer Space 
	•	15 : Fright Christmas 
	•	16 : Don't Ever Get Sick At Granny's 
	•	17 : House Of A Thousand Screams 
	•	18 : Camp Fear Ghouls 
	•	19 : Three Evil Wishes 
	•	20 : Spell of the Screaming Jokers 
	•	21 : Creature From Club Lagoona, the 
	•	22 : Field of Screams 
	•	23 : Why I'm Not Afraid Of Ghosts 
	•	24 : Monster Dog 
	•	25 : Halloween Bugs Me! 
	•	26 : Go To Your Tomb - Right Now! 
	•	27 : Parents From The 13th Dimension 
	•	28 : Hide and Shriek II 
	•	29 : Tale Of The Blue Monkey 
	•	30 : I Was A Sixth-Grade Zombie 
	•	31 : Escape Of The He-Beast 
	•	32 : Caution: Aliens At Work 
	•	33 : Attack of the Vampire Worms 
	•	34 : Horror Hotel: The Vampire Checks In 
	•	35 : Horror Hotel: Ghost in the Guest Room 
	•	36 : Funhouse of Dr. Freek, the  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.112.27.216 (talk) 20:02, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No-one forgot Ghosts of Fear Street! A list of Ghosts of Fear Street books is there on Ghosts of Fear Street page. --TayyabSaeed (talk) 09:58, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  someone forgot the ghosts of fear street!!!!!!!!!!!! 

message: The file :File:Series of Fear Street by R.L. Stine.jpg, used on this page, has been deleted from Wikimedia Commons and re-uploaded at :File:Series of Fear Street by R.L. Stine.jpg. It should be reviewed to determine if it is compliant with this project's non-free content policy, or else should be deleted and removed from this page. If no action is taken, it will be deleted after 7 days.  Commons fair use upload bot (talk) 21:25, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use candidate from Commons: [[:File:Series of Fear Street by R.L. Stine.jpg]]
Talk:Warlord (DC Comics)

message: A new series began in 2006 which has restarted the Warlord mythos from the beginning.--RedKnight 21:47, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: New Series

message: There is an idea that Travis Morgan and Ace Morgan are brothers. Is this note-worthy of the article? A QUIVER FULL OF QUEENS Jeffrywith1e (talk) 01:14, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No, because it is both original research, and speculation. --68.46.148.86 (talk) 00:36, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Ace Morgan

message: This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject.  If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class.  The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject.  Comics-awb (talk) 18:00, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Comics B-Class Assesment required

message: How did he get more bullets? Did he just have to ration them?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.73.70.113 (talk) 04:10, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just out of curiosity 

message: As this B-Class article has yet to receive a review, it has been rated as C-Class. If you disagree and would like to request an assesment, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment and list the article. Hiding T  14:44, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: C-Class rated for Comics Project

message: Warlord v2 the 6-part miniseries appeared in 1992 and not from 2006-2007
Warlord v3 from 2006 -2007 (10 Numbers)
and Warlord v4 from 2009 -2010 (16 Numbers)
I still don't know how to everything properly changes, so I leave you the change
Thank You 
:-) a Comicfan
(217.253.248.205 (talk) 14:24, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Warlord v2 -v4 correct Year publication
Talk:Billy Baxter (motorcyclist)

message: I'm going to make this article a disambig, and move the current article to a new name, as there is the poker player, as well as a musician/radio host (linked from Geelong, Victoria and To Hal and Bacharach).  I'm thinking Billy Baxter (racer)?  -- Chuq 12:26, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: And a footballer. Agreed. This suggestion has been here for 9 months without opposition. If it's still uncontentious in a week, I'll make the move. --Dweller (talk) 12:28, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --Dweller (talk) 12:57, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page name 
Talk:Stovepiping

message: Where did the word come from? Where was it first used-- Hersch's column, or was this term understood in the context of information theory, or... Please, I'd like to know if ANYBODY was "stovepiped" (and called it that) prior to 2003.
Perhaps the "we report, you decide" motto has been taken too literally by some? Can't it be said that, for instance, most politically-oriented blogs and discussion are often or even typically "stovepipes"?
Also, isn't the very compilation and extraction of data, its emphasis implied by its inclusion in a set of data, a filtering process? Is "common sense" a regularized filter in most disciplines (heh, not in government, I'm sure)? How many times have you heard of a corporation where the board or CEO has a wholly different view of the facts and their interpretation than the shareholders or outside observers or even of their own mid and lower level employees?
Could an argument be made that you need access to BOTH filtered, analyzed and vetted opinions AND raw or divergent views? That ultimately the fewer "layers" of interpretation preceding the final digestion of the "facts" by the decisionmaker, the better? How often do we accuse leaders of being "out of touch?"
I'm aware the neutrality issue in this entry is important; I think partly it is because it has not sufficient linkage to a discussion of how information is SUPPOSED to be supplied to the decision-making process... an appeal to "common sense" is good, if it is YOUR sensibilities used as the baseline.
Ahem, the volume of data is not always a good indicator of its utility-- a preponderance of evidence can't guide someone UNLESS one is convinced that the set of exceptions is suspect, tainted, unrelated or has inherently less value.
The CIA missed a few things on the road to our current situation, didn't it? When do you deprecate a source of analysis, and by how much?
Just a few thoughts to play with, if you choose. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 207.53.228.145 (talk) 18:14, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The term itself, and should it necessarily be considered "bad?" 

message: US reveals plans to hit back at cyber threats 
"We have 10,000 people to do this, but the problem is they are stovepiped," said Elder.
"Stovepiping" has two complementary meanings. In IT terms it describes information held in separate databases which is difficult to access due to its multiple locations — the UK equivalent term would be "siloed". In intelligence-gathering terms — the Eighth also serves as the US Air Force information operations headquarters — "stovepiping" refers to information which has been passed up the chain of command without undergoing due diligence.
good this article exists. I thought you might be interested LeaNder (talk) 21:10, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition
Talk:Droz (wrestler)

message: As sad as it may be, I think the picture there currently is misleading and would support a picture showing him after his injury.--Screwball23 talk 21:50, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture

message: Indeed, Droz is a quadriplegic, but many older reports on the internet state he is a paraplegic. I would like to know more about his injury and medical status because the injury was without a doubt, one of the most devastating in wrestling and has less details than Owen Hart's for example.--Screwball23 talk 21:50, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Paralysis status

message: Did they ever find out who threw the drink?
:No, if anyone had found out, it would probably have made news. Throwing drinks or garbage into the arena was not uncommon in the WCW, ECW, or WWF before security measures were stepped-up, so it could not have been easy to catch.--Screwball23 talk 14:53, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Errant drink thrower
Talk:Ami Dolenz

message: Does anyone know why her official website hasn't been updated in 5 years? Jbm867 21:52, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  WEBSITE 

message: Moved trivia in article here per WP:TRIV. If items can be integrated and properly sourced, please do so. Pinkadelica 07:28, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Trivia Section
Talk:Michael Crowley (journalist)

message: I deleted the following section, which seems to refer to another Michael Crowley (not the editor of TNR):
"Michael P. Crowley, producer of Keats and his Nightingale: A Blind Date, lives in Providence, RI.  He is a teacher of English-Literature in Warwick, RI."Myc2001 21:54, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion

message: Another question would be why some lightly educated kid like Michael Crowley is even the subject of a Wikipedia article before he even has one gray hair.  It isn't like this kid is trying to solve the Unified Field Theory or something.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.44.145.124 (talk) 19:54, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Because he has a small penis. ;) --98.237.147.82 (talk) 08:39, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Another Question Would Be

message: This guys is geberally pretty caustic, I remember a piece he wrote about Michaal Jordan when Jordan retired that was written like an angry blog. This should be nted when (or if ) expansion occurs. Quadzilla99 16:19, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Caustic

message: Why would one clame to be the basis of a child rapist character? The novel was released in nov. assuming that it was intentional it would have to be a hastily made change. I feel this is not a noteworthy event and the person in question is groping for attention...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.113.39.26 (talk) 09:25, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  question
Talk:Madeley Wood Company

message: The original Madeley Wood Company ceased to exist in 1776, butn the name was later sued for another partnership operating the works.  The article might better be entitled 'Madeley Wood Ironworks' or 'Bedlam Furnaces'.  I have removed a link to a non-existent 'Bedlam Furnaces' article, because I cannot see any point in having a separate article on this.  
Incidentally, a picture used to illustrate the Coalbrookdale article is actually of this ironworks (despite its title).  Perhaps that should be moved (or copied) here.  [note - I have deleted a previous version of this comment, some of whose content was unjustified). Peterkingiron 22:26, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:House rule

message: I threw up the dutch house rules.  This idea applies all over the place, and not necessarily to games (or roleplaying) -- Sy / (talk) 22:07, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know what that means, but I do know that half the section ostensibly on RPGs seems to actually be about miniatures wargames. Would "tabletop games" or "hobby games" perhaps be a better heading? 50.72.201.97 (talk) 11:43, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In the current revision the lead discusses rules and customs that organisations have, while the body discusses an almost completely different topic of modifying games. I will scrap this lead and make it a summary of the sections. --LukeSurl t c 18:27, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead not reflecting body 
Talk:Drosera anglica

message: These words appear in the header: "sterile hybrid between these two species doubled its chromosomes to produce fertile progeny".  Is this jargon I don't grok, or is this nonsense?  How does a sterile hybrid double its chromosomes?  How does a sterile anything do anything with chromosomes?  How does a sterile anything produce progeny (fertile or not)?  I'm no botanist, but I think the intent is that the hybrid is normally sterile, but an polyploid hybrid was fertile, and led to this species.  — Randall Bart (talk) 23:10, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A sterile hybrid obviously cannot normally produce progeny. Producing double the chromosomes during pollen and ovule production, however, can allow fertilization to take place. Its explained in more depth in the final paragraph of the article. The original intro just listed the plant as being amphidiploid, but I was requested to explain the term there, for which a sentence doesn't really suffice. --NoahElhardt 00:04, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sterile hybrid did what?
Talk:Nevin Birsa

message: It is doubtful that the name of the article and the content correspond. Besides, Birsa is listed at List of Slovenian language poets what is highly unlikely for an Indian without any know connection to the languege. Besides, he is listed under living people, born in 1947. If noone opposes, I am going to move the article in a few days. --Tone 22:19, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment
Talk:Forestdale, London

message: Why was this changed from Forestdale, Croydon to Forestdale, London? Forestdale is most certainly part of Croydon, in the same way as Selsdon, Purley, Coulsdon are. Croydon on the whole is part of London, yes. So are we going to change all the Croydon villages to London? Not likely, surely? We seem to have a right old mess with these Croydon villages. We have Norbury, Coulsdon, Selsdon, and Sanderstead, but Purley, London; Forestdale, London; Addington, London; and Shirley, London. Well, they either are entirely on their own, belong to London or belong to Croydon. What is it to be? I can assure you Forestdale, Purley, Addington, Shirley, Sanderstead, Norbury, Coulsdon and Selsdon are very much part of Croydon. Forestdale is one of the original CR0 postcodes, purely Croydon. You can't have it both ways. Dieter Simon 22:21, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Any district with an unambiguous name is given an article at that name.  However, if you go to Purley, Forestdale, Addington etc. you will discover that they are disambiguation pages.  The convention for disambiguating London districts is to simply make them "XXXXX, London".  That convention is apparent across all articles about London districts.  DJR (T) 17:21, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Forestdale, Croydon to Forestdale, London? Why? 
Template talk:House of Stewart (Scotland)

message: This coat of arms should be of the Steward/Stewarts.  Personals coat of arms belongs to dynasties--national coats of arms go to kingdoms.  See the Duke of Rothesay's arms; minus galleys and escutcheon.  All surname bearers of Stewart have historically used such arms, including Matthew Stewart, 4th Earl of Lennox.  IP Address 22:24, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: comments

message: I've nominated this template for deletion, as it appears to me ill thought out in the extreme. Were it a horizontal footer table, or a collapsible vertical table, it /might/ just pass - though why we would want to see a list of all of the children of all Stuart kings is beyond me. As it is, I find it nothing more than a conceit. Just because a thing can be done does not mean it should be done. See Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2008 February 14. --Tagishsimon (talk) 01:06, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: TfD