Talk:Christian von Ehrenfels

message: If Freiherr means "Baron", does "Freiherr von Ehrenfels" mean "Baron of Ehrenfels", a place name?  If so, what was this person's name?  And isn't the lack of information dreadful? Unfree (talk) 15:13, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Freiherr

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Christian von Ehrenfels. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100404031212/http://scriptorium.hfg-karlsruhe.de/ehrenfels.html to http://scriptorium.hfg-karlsruhe.de/ehrenfels.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040805101202/http://www.austrian-philosophy.at/ehrenfels_kurzbiographie.html to http://www.austrian-philosophy.at/ehrenfels_kurzbiographie.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:28, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I don't understand how does calling a racist a racist make this article not neutral? The editor from Brazil who applied that tag once told me that it was wrong to call Wilhelm II a white supremacist, which either reflects an admiration for the Kaiser and/or a lack of understanding of the man, and that it was "normal" for white people to hate Asian people in the early 20th century. The latter point is correct, but the question is of perspective. The editor from Brazil told me explicitly that the Yellow Peril article should be written from an "European perspective", and exclude the viewpoint of the Asian victims, which strikes me as a questionable and objectionable way of handling the subject. Why should the viewpoint of the victims be excluded? Asians certainly did not see the "Yellow Peril" viewpoint as "normal", and I don't understand why the editor from Brazil has such a problem with that. The editor from Brazil certainly seems to think this article is not neutral because it calls Ehrenthels a racist. Perhaps he would like this article better if documented Ehrenthels's noble efforts to warn the white race of the necessity of sexual reforms to counter the "Yellow Peril"?--A.S. Brown (talk) 23:58, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Christian von Ehrenfels. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160407031930/http://ontology.buffalo.edu/smith/articles/Kafka.PDF to http://ontology.buffalo.edu/smith/articles/kafka.PDF
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:28, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I fixed some obvious grammatical errors. Also white -> White, black -> Black etc. (as a concept) should be used almost everywhere here and in related racialist articles. Zezen (talk) 10:50, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Style fixes needed