lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Cyperus eragrostis

message: This plant is also found widely throughout the Auckland region of New Zealand.  It was first noticed here in about 1991.  This is not yet designated a weed but given the speed of it invasiveness and difficulty in herbicide use to remove the local pest it should not be to long before it is designated a weed (Jan 2010).
Huiadixs (talk) 03:38, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Enterprise Engine and Foundry Co.

message: I have put this article in the category "Companies based in San Francisco" because it is a historical article and the company was founded in San Francisco. Please re-categorize it, if appropriate. Biscuittin 18:58, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: The following note, entered previously by another member, actually refers to what a company best known by those in the field, as Powerhouse Diesel Services,Inc. or Powerhouse, Inc. last known location Benicia, California. (There have been name variants over a period of years.) The citation of  employing '50+ former Enterprise staff' should be verified, but may refer to hires made over several years. The company contracts manufacture of a limited list of Enterprise parts. Some are now built to their improved design, but Powerhouse is neither a foundry, nor an industrial manufacturing facility. The company maintains a well equipped metal working shop and does in-house parts 'refurbishing' via machine shop processes, blast cleaning (where appropriate, for purposes of repainting), etc. Most customer projects contracted to Powerhouse, which require on-site operations involving large industrial machinery or specialized industrial equipment specific to a process is sub-contracted by Powerhouse to other companies in the large engine MRO support services field. At present, there is within the industry, a wide ranging estimation of how many Enterprise engines remain in service. It's known that some were built/sold for use out of the country and some were sold overseas when retired from US service, some are known scrapped - especially marine propulsion installations. It's questionable whether the OEM, Cameron International, supplies hundreds of the engines now.
Note: Another company Powerhouse Engineered Products is a prime distributor of parts for these engines as well. The company hired 50+ employees from the original Enterprise factory back in the 50's and manufactures and supplies parts for hundreds of these engines.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cdkilgour (talk • contribs) 19:27, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extracted from article 

message: The citation is an incomplete list. There are far more Enterprises in service than this.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.204.131.70 (talk) 21:40, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Few Engines Remaining- INCORRECT
Talk:Gertrude Olmstead

message: I have changed the year of birth from the uncited 1897 to 1904, which is the year given in Silent Players: A Biographical and Autobiographical Study of 100 Silent Film Actors and Actresses]. Eddie Blick (talk) 02:40, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Nice work - thank you! Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 07:56, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: You're welcome! It's always a pleasure when research brings good results. Eddie Blick (talk) 19:39, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year of birth
Template talk:Compression software

message: I noticed that the compression utility that comes with Windows isn't listed here. Is there a reason? :) Strawberry Island 19:15, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's non-notable. Plenty of applications have home-brewed zip support, Windows being one of them. I suppose if someone were to write something on Wikipedia about Windows's Compressed Folders feature we might be able to include it, but it's not a huge omission. Chris Cunningham 07:53, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Windows Compression utility

message: Open source, proprietary, freeware and command line.
Command-line applications can be any or all of the other three groups, all of which themselves overlap (and the odd application might be in all four categories; it's not impossible).  A better division might be proprietary versus free, or GUI versus command line.  What's there now is neither informative nor easy to predict, and would be as usefully served as an uncategorized list.
82.163.145.48 (talk) 16:53, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archivers are divided into rather arbitrary categories 

message: Where would ffdshow & ProRes 422 fall in this template? —IncidentFlux [ TalkBack | Contributions ] 17:36, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  ffdshow & ProRes 422 

message: bzip2, gzip, compress, and lzop are not archivers. They are pure compression only. They should not be listed under "archivers." --Spoon! (talk) 03:10, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That's right. So do you think a separate category for compression should be added? Or maybe the category could be renamed to "File compression and archivers", since RAR and others fall into both categories... Actually, the template name is "Compression Software Implementations", so does this mean for example tar does not belong there at all, as it does not compress data? (I know it can use gzip etc. for compression, but is it a built-in feature, or does it use external software for that?)—J. M. (talk) 05:03, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

text: If you split all these, then you possibly need a category split for each type of license reflected in the lists. I was going to add xz to the list. If by convention of gzip, bzip2, compress, lzop being in the list, xz should be too, as its coming into wide use, but last I looked at this, there was the obvious inconsistency noted previously.  There's some mingling and overlap between List_of_archive_formats and this list that should be discussed.  Leehenderson (talk) 18:29, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  bzip2, gzip, compress, lzop are not archivers 

message: Is Tar really an archiver with compression? From `man tar`: GNU ‘tar’ saves many files together into a single tape or disk archive, and can restore individual files from the archive. Artem-S-Tashkinov (talk) 09:50, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tar
Talk:George Nichols (actor and director)

message: George Nichols may have acted in more than 200 films. But also he directed more than 110 films as well. Callng him just an actor would be injustice and misrepresentation, or just preference on our side. I am sure he was as proud of his own directed films. So who are we to judge and promote him as an actor for a career? Both is the only fair way of representing him werldwayd (talk) 23:09, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know what the naming convention would be in this case, but I have no objections. Thanks for being bold! Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 08:44, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Move to "actor and director"
Talk:Parameswaravarman I

message: The Pandya leader Marvarman was expanded to 'Arikesari Parankusa Maravarman'.
I've changed this to Arikesari Maravarman Nindraseer Nedumaaran, as he was the Maravarman who was a contemporary of Paramesvaravarman, based on Pandya Kingdom. Jihg 19:21, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Marvarman
Talk:Nokia 6070

message: How can i download the photos from my Nokia 6070?  The PC doesn't recognize the hardware.  I already downloaded the Nokia PC Suite, but it still doesn't recognize, so it still doesn't do anything...HELP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ----John
:Sorry, I can't ☺  Spiby  ☻ 15:08, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Paradiastole

message: The biblical bit was very corrupt.  I corrected the Greek text and replaced the very rough translation with a literal one much more appropriate for discussing the structure of the sentence (the old translation really obscured the interesting parallels in the verse).  I also rewrote the interpretation because the one given was spectacularly incorrect; I'm not a theologian, but I can correctly identify the antecedent of a pronoun *grin* (οἳ "they" here refers clearly to the πιστεύοντες "believers" of the previous verse, or perhaps ὅσοι ἔλαβον αὐτόν "whichever ones received him", who are the same; it cannot refer to Christ who is, quite notably, singular). Tkinias 19:31, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biblical bit
Talk:Pareto

message: i've done some previous reading for a university module, where i came across a book about pareto's son, this was a very old book which i can no longer get my hands on. The son of Pareto was also a sociologist and philosopher with a slightly darker take on the world. i was hoping that someone could point me in the right direction in regard to finding any biographical information or even just a run down of his ideas. 
79.72.244.215 19:32, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The son of Pareto

message: ===Reporting  the talk from “pareto principle”===
80-20 rule ?? - For my part, I've ever heard of a "20-80 rule" so far. 
* May be this is not very important. But the starting point of organisation is to aim at better comfort and efficiency, isn'it ?  So, admitted that the basical form is "x-y rule", the fact that Pareto allowes us to organize better refers to the y/x ratio, describing the increasing effect of a right distribution as "four times more than invested". And the corresponding  ratio is 20-80, not 80-20, that warns us not to forget that decreasing effect(s) do follow the phenomenon.  Is that correct ? 2rh (talk) 13:22, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Introducing a “Pareto principle history”

message: 80-20 rule ?? - For my part, I've ever heard of a "20-80 rule" so far. 
* May be this is not very important. But the starting point of organisation is to aim at better comfort and efficiency, isn'it ?  So, admitted that the basical form is "x-y rule", the fact that Pareto allowes us to organize better refers to the y/x ratio, describing the increasing effect of a right distribution as "four times more than invested". And the corresponding  ratio is 20-80, not 80-20, that warns us not to forget that decreasing effect(s) do follow the phenomenon.  Is that correct ? 2rh (talk) 13:22, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reporting  the talk from “pareto principle”
Talk:Status attainment

message: Work has begun on the construction of a proper Status Attainment Article! Welcome to the talk page! --Rw649306 19:35, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I am afraid I had to revert your work. First, you removed the useful wikified lead and existed category and reference. Second, your text was too much essay like for what is supposed to be an encyclopedic article ("Doesn’t seem right does it? People can’t possibly think that the..."). Don't hesitate to rewrite and restore an updated article - but please pay attention to WP:MOS and WP:NOT#OTHOUGHT (point 3: "Wikipedia is not a publisher of ersonal essays". PS. Again, I think much of your contribution is salvageable, and I hope you restore it after rewriting in a more acceptable (less personal) format.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  21:40, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

text: I will be happy to help you. You may want to check WP:SUP and WP:WPCC.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  01:54, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

text: Great, you can read about how to cite on Wikipedia on WP:CITE.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  02:26, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I was just looking around-- and you guys have made a great deal of progress.  It is good to see also that several folks are contributing in a number of areas of the article.  --Htw3 18:31, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good progress 

message: Your current research section still needs development-- you only have one study.  It is a good one to chose because it brings a comparative framework to a topic that has mainly been studied in the US.  However-- you need to find some of the other current work on status attainment.   --Htw3 18:31, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current research 

message: I feel like this article needs to be taken down and started from scratch. The editor who made it admitted that he did it for a class project, and it reads like an essay in Marxism. The tone is like nothing I've ever seen on Wikipedia and I fear this article is irredeemable. Chrisvacc (talk) 00:57, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: This article doesn't mention Marxism. Why does the article's tone need improvement? Jarble (talk) 13:04, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is still really bad 

message: Is the subject even notable enough to justify keeping the article? The opening paragraph doesn't even properly define the concept. BlueBanana (talk) 18:05, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I've found thousands of articles on Google Scholar that mention this subject. Is it still not notable? Jarble (talk) 13:07, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:A.C. Cossor

message: The move from Cossor House in Highbury to Harlow was part of the general decentralization encouraged by the government and facilitated through the New Towns. It was not greeted with universal acclaim. Highbury finally closed in 1962. Quite a few die-hards (including Pterre senior) were still 'commuting the wrong way', getting up at 6am to catch a company bus and rarely seeing home in daylight, into the 1970s.Pterre 19:41, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I will have a dig in the loft. Pterre 23:52, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It is not correct that Cossors were taken over by Philips. As I understand it they sold the rights to use of the 'Cossor' name for domestic radios etc. However the A.C.Cossor company continued to trade, and was eventually taken over by Raytheon. The company timeline is correct, not the reference to Philips above it. Pterre (talk) 18:29, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Philips 
Talk:Gerald O. Young

message: I stopped by this page and while reading it, I found that I was curious as to what happened to the other crash survivor. His fate isn't mentioned in the article as it was - or in the citations - only that he survived the crash.  I found a more complete article on the action that day at the Air Mobility Command Museum site, which states that the other survivor was indeed rescued along with Young.  In fact, there is a great deal more information at this resource, and I may be adding more to this article in the future.  This being my first edit in a very long time, however, if anyone notices anything I've done incorrectly please fix it up - I'm still learning.  Many thanks! Gh05t (talk) 15:19, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Insertion of some new material

message: Where were on the day the helicopter was stolen Alande luthando (talk) 07:09, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  I am not sure you are a suspect
Talk:Alaria (alga)

message: Alaria/Dabberlocks!
The algal species 'Alaria esculenta  is the botanial name for dabberlocks. The species is written up as two separate articles. I suggest they be united under Alaria esculenta. Other algae are recorded under the botanical name. If this is agreed please advice on how this is done. Osborne 20:10, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You could propose to merge the articles following the instructions at Help:Merging and moving pages. You could also simply post a related comment on the talk page of both articles, like you did. Contacting the creator of the recently created Alaria, Osborne, may help clear the issue up. Maybe he doesn't know of the other article? — aldebaer⁠ 20:32, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Omg, I was way off. You are Osborne, I didn't realise this wasn't your talk page. Well, go to Help:Merging and moving pages and follow the instructions there. — aldebaer⁠ 20:34, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A computerised algorithm has generated a version of this page using data obtained from AlgaeBase.  You may be able to incorporate elements into the current article. Alternatively, it may be appropriate to create a new page at Alaria (alga). Anybot (contact operator) 02:16, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Jack (talk) 12:24, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bot-generated content 

message: It is commercially available. My food co-op sells it - some suppliers call it "Irish Wakame". Secretlondon (talk) 00:35, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is commercially available 

message: Suggest confusion, partly my fault! This file refers to a genus not to the species A. esculents.Osborne 20:54, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Confusion
Talk:Tommy Jansson

message: I'm not convinced Jansson was killed at a World Championship qualifier. According to this comprehensive guide to the Swedish qualifying stages of the World Championship http://www.speedway.org/history/76.htm#1976 Jansson had already qualified for the Swedish Final with maximum points on May 9 at Lindesberg and then did not take his place at the Swedish Final at Linköping on May 25. If he died at a meeting in Stockholm on May 20, it was clearly not a World Championship qualifier.
--Rcclh (talk) 19:23, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Classification of the sciences (Peirce)

message: I suggest that Wikipedia establishes a general article "Classification of the Sciences"
the input for this entry could be my contribution here:
http://www.db.dk/bh/Core%20Concepts%20in%20LIS/articles%20a-z/classification_of_the_sciences.htm  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.215.206.245 (talk) 16:40, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

message: I need to explain the two question marks in the table of sciences, and, more importantly, explain that in 1902 Peirce put the psychical sciences BEFORE the physical sciences, reversed that order by 1903, any case held that neither had decisively influenced the other and held that their ordering with respect to each other perhaps didn't much matter. But I have to find the sources and I'm exhausted today. The Tetrast 21:30, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: A note

message: I had it all mixed up about the various texts involved in the classifications of the sciences. I've straightened it out and will be tweaking it more. Thank goodness I have some pros looking over my shoulder and alerting me. The Tetrast 21:01, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Big error repaired

message: I am astounded to see there is no reference whatsoever in this article to Beverly Kent's seminal, Charles S. Peirce: Logic and the Classification of the Sciences (McGill-Queen's University Press, Montreal, 1987). Is this because this source was not known to the original authors of this article? or other reasons? My own research suggests that Kent's treatment is the seminal source for analysis thereafter. If I do not hear otherwise, I shall begin edits on this article to reflect Kent's analysis. 
Mkbergman (talk) 03:38, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where is Kent?
Talk:Heliox

message: I've added such references as I thought were relevant - do I now remove the Unreferenced tag?
Is there enough here to remove the diving-stub tag - or is that best left in to encourage further contribution? RexxS (talk) 02:31, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Hey there RexxS, glad to see you've joined the SCUBA project.  I removed the unreferenced tag, you did an excellent job referencing the article.  The "stub" tag should probably go to.  If you read here, you'll see that this article is considerably longer than what is normally viewed as a "stub".  If you read here, you'll see that anyone can remove a stub tag, you don't need special powers.  Just click on Edit this page, and pull it out of there!  If you feel the article could still use further expansion, you can add .  It's a tag that requests expansion, but doesn't classify the article as "stub". Put it in place of the stub tag.  I'll leave you to it - go for it!   Again, great work, happy editing!  Keeper  |  76 16:34, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks for your help and guidance - it's much appreciated. I think that the section on Heliox diving could be expanded to emphasise the differences between Heliox and trimix - or maybe that's best done in the trimix page? Hopefully the expand tag will attract some more content. RexxS (talk) 23:15, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Maintenance tags
Talk:Jacob Van Braam

message: Why was Washington's as major of militia "nominal"? 84.23.155.84 (talk) 15:53, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nominal rank? 

message: Doesn't "of the Dalgetty order" mean "like the novel figure 'Dalgetty' ", rather than "a member of the [non-existent] order of 'Dalgetty' "? Hence, the note would be superfluos. 84.23.155.84 (talk) 15:57, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dalgetty order
Talk:Peter Karlsson (speedway rider)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: no consensus. No consensus after a relist last week and I don't think there's going to be sufficient participation with another relist. (closed by non-admin page mover) Zippybonzo | talk | contribs (he|she|they) 19:33, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Peter Karlsson (speedway rider) →  – Title is ambiguous: Peter Ingvar Karlsson was also a speedway rider. jlwoodwa (talk) 21:01, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

text: Relisting comment: Not seeing anything clear popping up, would like more input on the original proposal and proposed alternative, EggRoll97 (talk)  15:04, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 9 November 2023
Talk:Wasted Days and Wasted Nights

message: The original version of this song charted as his second hit song, on the Cash Box Hot 100 charts in 1960, entering on #95 on July 9th, peaking at #82 on July 30th, and spending a total of 5 weeks on the charts. Noting it charted after he got arrested. 62.145.207.157 (talk) 03:21, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wasted days and wasted nights
Talk:Artificial gills (human)

message: I don't know how relevant this is but, it is possible for the water molecules to be split using electricity and then if the oxygen was separated from the hydrogen large amounts of water wouldn't be needed. However I don't know how much electricity would be needed. But this is much more likely way of breathing underwater then the methods suggested in the article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.71.87.182 (talk) 18:04, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Different Method 

message: Just extracting oxygen out of the water is useless to a scuba diver. 100% oxygen becomes toxic at about 6m. I train my students in about double that. You need a gaseous medium, preferably something like nitrogen. Where do any of these systems aquire that? Or do they work as rebreathers? Either way it should be I the article  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.91.93.244 (talk) 15:59, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  oxygen toxicicity 

message: The two numbers given on this page, 1 liter / minute and 1 mol / hour, contradict each other: 1 mol is 22.4 liters at STP, so 1 liter / minute is approximately 3 mol / hour. Kerrick Staley (talk) 21:41, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amount of oxygen required by a human 

message: Though it appears the "Triton artificial gills" aren't really a rebreather as previously claimed, I noticed that someone else tried to add it to this article. I decided to post a copy here in talk in case someone else comes to this article looking for something about it.  Also, there's a lot of talk about it on Reddit at: https://www.reddit.com/r/shittykickstarters/search?q=triton&sort=new&restrict_sr=on  • Sbmeirow • Talk • 08:54, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Triton artificial gills 

message: As referenced in the article, the density of dissolved oxygen in water requires a very large volume of water constantly flowing through the gill to meet human oxygen needs.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Klaun (talk • contribs) 19:57, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dissolved oxygen density of water and human oxygen requirements are limiting factor