lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Courtship of Eddie's Father

message: This article appears to be entirely about the TV series, but the intro is about the 1963 film.  There probably should be 2 separate articles, or at least a separate section for the film.  --George100 06:47, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: TV series

message: *I first saw this back on WWOR in 1994. From the first episode, I was hooked. It was loosely based on the 60's film starring Glenn Ford and Ron Howard, where widowed father Tom Corbett raises his son the best he can in New York City. In the meantime, Eddie stars finding new love interests for his father. A few years later, this show popped up.
*There were a few changes to the show. In the show, Tom is now a magazine editor for a newspaper in California. He and Eddie are best friends, like the song says. I liked the character of Tom. He never talked down to Eddie and always knew how to balance the best friend/father trick. That is what makes him one of TV's greatest dads.
*Eddie could always count on the other people in his life too like "Uncle" Norman (Tom's co-worker), Tina (Tom's secretary) and Mrs. Livingston (their maid). It was sort of a neat, extended family. In real life, people would be lucky to have that. I also liked how the series slowly turned away from the original plot of the film of Eddie finding his father a wife. It became about a father and son who are crazy about each other.
*I think what slowly destroyed the show was the plots started focusing around Norman, rather than Tom and Eddie. The stories ranged from Uncle Norman trying to lose five pounds over the weekend to Uncle Norman's love affairs. I know Bill Bixby was peeved at that but James Komack (Uncle Norman) was the producer, so there wasn't much that could be done.
*Still, it was a fun show (even if there were a few annoying things to it like the music and the laugh track), but still a heartwarming show.
*Pat 
Can we incorporate the above insights somehow? (Do we need to contact Pat for permission to quote him, or better yet, get him to sign up here and add those comments himself?) --Uncle Ed (talk) 17:32, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Excellent summary, from IMDB

message: Season One is now available through multiple outlets like Amazon.com and deepdiscount.com so I removed the reference that it's only available through the WBShop.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.194.75.4 (talk) 22:06, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: If a reference is no longer current, it should be replaced with an updated one. Perhaps, a reference that states the release date could be added? – Zntrip 22:09, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: DVD release

message: I am not so sure this form of address solely reflects that Mrs. Livingston thinks Eddie is more important. This would be a standard form of address in Japan (Eddie no otoo san, lit. "Honorable father of Eddie") for someone whose primary relationship was with the child, such as a teacher.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.208.14.221 (talk) 02:47, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  " Mr. Eddie's Father"
Talk:White Squall (film)

message: Why is there a Q references section in this article? These lunatics are spreading....  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 170.252.109.62 (talk) 14:24, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What is the date May 2 1962 and the word sinking referring to?
Book M 09:30, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: pretty sure it was a brigantine, not a schooner... anyone want to check this? Nhoj 14:40, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Arghhh.... this movie (which I have not yet seen) has been ruined for me now because or this: "In the film four people aboard the ship perish, whereas in reality six people died in the incident." There needs to be a -contains spoilers- or something!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Larapod (talk • contribs) 04:29, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I just tried to add a reference for the brigantine Eye of the Wind in the Production section, but apparently associatedcontent.com is on wikipedia's blacklist.  I'm noting the reference here in case anyone wants to know or wants to try in get it delisted: (*** = associatedcontent.com)
http://www.***/article/5737768/white_squall_the_sinking_of_the_school.html?cat=37
--Mindfrieze (talk) 17:17, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Blocked Reference
Talk:1492: Conquest of Paradise

message: What a tragedy !! What a waste of Genius !!  1492 remains among the greatest films ever made !! A masterpiece that will live on as a cult 200 years from now !! 86.179.204.166 (talk) 20:12, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "They begin to build the city of San Salvador and eventually manage to hoist the town bell into its tower, symbolising the arrival of Christianity in the New World." - This is incorrect, both historically and in the film. Columbus never founded a city on San Salvador. The city he founded in the film and in history is La Isabela, on Hispaniola. SchnitteUK (talk) 17:39, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong place for the city

message: I think there should be a small section concerning the disparity between the movies depiction of Columbus and the latest historical research on his person.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.134.186.251 (talk) 05:39, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical accuracy 

message: The entire Production section is kind of garbage.  It says that it is sourced to some untraceable packet handed out by the film studio (and therefore is not a neutral source, anyway).  Is anyone else concerned about this level of standards?  If anything, taking much of this pressbook material verbatim borders on WP:COPYVIO. - AppleBsTime (talk) 21:00, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, and I removed the section before I noticed your post here. -- John of Reading (talk) 11:38, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Production
Talk:The Duellists

message: Sorry I don't see the point of Grandpafootsoldier uploading and affixing a new poster image when an adequate image already existed. Claiming "per WP films guidelines" doesn't just make it so, as an origin image already acquired and tagged under "fair use" was in place. Furthermore, the wear and age damages to the new image make it extra puzzling why it is persistently pushed.  Murghdisc. 15:53, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Check out Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Style guidelines for what I'm referring to. The first image is not the original one-sheet for the film, and is additionally a foreign language version for an English film. Additionally, the first image is over 300px, and so is a bit larger than is usually allowed. For all of these reasons the second image is preferable. - Grandpafootsoldier 04:43, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: For what you cite, I disagree with that kind of zealously myopic interpretation of the WP guidelines. An original release image was already in place, maybe a few, easily altered, pixels wider than norm, but of a smaller size than its replacement, but, mon dieu!, it isn't an English one? Please continue to think about what is constructive contribution to the WP project, and don't upload imagery unfit to use when doing null-work. If English media is mandatory, please supply something better than an eBay pic. Murghdisc. 16:15, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Replacing poster image

message: there is a subtext to the story, d'Hubert is portrayed as an aristocrat, whereas Feraud is an ordinary citizen, who owes his career to the rise of Bonaparte. this duality (no pun intended) shows itself towards the denouement, when Feraud aids in Bonaparte's attempt to regain power, while d'Hubert refuses to take part in.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.115.41.72 (talk) 22:16, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  addition 

message: Don't see reason for it, nothing in the movie suggests that D'Hubert is a anti bonapartist, just less zealist. For example still refers to him as Emperor after he is exiled and appears uncomfortable when the aristocrats called Napoleon an ogre. 119.18.1.119 (talk) 16:37, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed anti-bonapartist description
Talk:The Cutting Edge

message: I don't remember Albertville being mentioned by name in the film. Can anyone confirm that? 23skidoo 18:09, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Albertville

message: I'm making a new page for the sequel, so I moving the info regarding "The Cutting Edge: Going for the Gold" from this page to the new page.  =)  Jumping cheese Contact 05:16, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Cutting Edge: Going for the Gold 

message: The summary seems to be more of a synopsis - a synopsis leave the plot open-ended, like this page, whereas a summary details the entire plot, including the end.  Savvy10 (talk) 23:48, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot Summary 

message: Did the two leads do their own skating, or did they have doubles?  If doubles, who were they? 2600:6C67:1C00:5F7E:1132:266:6C95:7851 (talk) 02:21, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  skaters
Talk:Benny & Joon

message: Reverted recent unencyclopedic edit, as it included POV comments 138.38.234.118 21:27, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

message: After watching this movie lately, asking myself which kind of mental disorder Joon may have, I was quite positive, that it mainly displays symptoms of asperger syndrome. The notion of schizophrenia mentioned in the article seams to be hardly substantiated to me. Joon mentiones during ping-pong her undisputed ability to count well. Her extraordinary need for system, regularity and order is mentioned. The medication is totally unspecific and as such no indicator for any specific disorder. Rather than dementia precox (old age/decay) she shows signs of child like behaviour (young/undeveloped). Her ability to solve an basically emotional problem on a purely intellectual (Letter writing) level is excellent. She shows no signs of being remote-controlled, rather egocentric and content with what she likes to do. Bursts of anger when others do not behave what she sees as correct. Has less empathy for others and describes their actions on the factual level, not knowing their emotions/motivations, also rather not judging or interpretating it. What I see is a rather light (comedy) case of asperger and no indication of schizophrenia.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0106387/faq--Manorainjan (talk) 12:05, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[schizophrenia]]? or [[asperger]] 

message: I've only seen bits and pieces of this movie, so I don't know all of the plot points. But maybe somebody who is more familiar with the movie can rewrite the plot summary. The one that's there now looks like it was written by a 10-year-old doing a book report.
208.125.176.34 (talk) 13:40, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  In need of a rewrite 

message: CONTENT REMOVED BY -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs email --Danaide (talk) 12:21, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:NOT WP:FORUM WP:SPAM. -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs email 02:02, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interpretation point
Talk:Riario

message: Should this be split into three articles? -- Mikeblas 01:39, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems that way to me...they don't seem to be conceptually related, just by name and family...so I made this a disambig page. NickelShoe 22:06, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Split up?
Talk:Bad girl art

message: This article has too few references and reads like an essay. Personal opinions are everywhere. Added template. --Mr. Guye (talk) 02:10, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 

message: Hello, I am a student at Louisiana State University in a Women's Gender Studies class, and I would like to go more in depth into the storyline behind the characters mentioned, the inspiration from the artists to make these characters, background information on the authors and illustrators involved in making these characters come to life, and what each of the characters represent in the Bad Girl Art movement. 
Saldri3 (talk) 14:33, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additions to this page 

message: — Assignment last updated by Nothinbutsierra (talk) 01:40, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Media and Gender
Talk:Legally Blonde

message: Even though the movie undoubtly has more cultural impact it is an adaption of the book which came first, so theoretically the title of the article should be "Legally Blonde (film)", no? Anothracountiges (talk) 20:19, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this the really the primary topic?
Talk:Legally Blonde 2: Red, White & Blonde

message: I was surprised that absolutely no mention was given to Bob Newhart's role as "Sid Post", the doorman at the hotel that Elle was staying. In fact, Newhart's role was relatively prominent, playing Elle's only real friendship in Washington, as well as provided her with insider information that was much needed in the story. I realize that Newhart wasn't listed as a primary actor, but he was by no means just a cameo actor.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.183.139.37 (talk) 21:05, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: What about Bob Newhart?

message: Any citation for the title Bigger, Bolder, Blonder?  I'm in the UK and have never seen it referred to by this title, DVD sales, Cinema release and TV showings all use Red, White and blonde.   --Brideshead(leave a message) 18:34, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: UK title
Talk:Beauty Shop

message: I've just been watching the film, and as of 08 August 2022 the imdb entry seems incorrect as well. They do not show the credit run, but I am positive that Octavia Spencer's character is named Ida, so I have made that amendment. Luxfornow (talk) 20:56, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pretty sure that Octavia Spencer's character is named Ida.
Talk:In Old Chicago

message: I'm perplexed by the release dates for this film. Surely this must have received a qualifying run in December of 1937, in order to qualify for the Oscars of that year? Just no source to verify it? --Cinemaniac86Dane_Cook_Hater_Extraordinaire 10:30, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release Date
Talk:Alexander's Ragtime Band

message: Shouldn't we separate this into two articles, one about the song and the other about the movie? --TonyM ｷﾀ━( °∀° )━ｯ!! 18:39, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: We can. If so, I think this article should be about the Irving Berlin tune (as that's the original meaning of the title), and the film split off to "Alexander's Ragtime Band (film)" -- Infrogmation 09:39, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Alexander's Ragtime Band (film) created.—Ketil Trout (<><!) 20:19, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separation 

message: I made a private note some years ago that the song was inspired by a part-time jazz band leader named Jack Alexander (1884 - 1 July 1958).  Any truth to this?  --  JackofOz 07:12, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Jack Alexander

message: If anyone's interested, here's GoogleBooks' preview of the page that is cited in this article about the Joplin plagiarism claim. Seems like a section about this would be due weight. Dan56 (talk) 23:33, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagiarism claim 

message: I just heard an interview on the radio - http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b04gqy6g - which asserted that this song changed popular music as it moved the beat from the previous 1 - 3 to the offbeat - 2 - 4. If so, that is worth noting. -- Beardo (talk) 16:32, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changing popular music ? 
Talk:The Gang's All Here (1943 film)

message: ...should be more neutral on the quality of various actor's performances. That's not the kind of call we should be making, nor, by extension, republishing.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.196.130.166 (talk) 08:05, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page reads like a review
Talk:The Girl Can't Help It

message: Should there be a mention of how influential this film was on all four members of the Beatles? It is discussed at relative length in the first 'Anthology' documentary on the group.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.167.224.49 (talk • contribs) 
:I agree, this movie is discussed and a film clip is shown in The Beatles' Anthology. There should be some mention I think.
Mirlin 02:03, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[The Beatles]]

message: Below information was tagged for needing sources long-term. Feel free to reinsert with appropriate references. DonIago (talk) 13:34, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced material 

message: It would be useful if the article mentioned if there was a soundtrack LP for this film, and what the track listing was, if there was one. 2601:545:8201:6290:0:0:0:B7E (talk) 15:07, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I did find this track info on a soundtrack LP for the film:
A1  Little Richard–   The Girl Can't Help It	 Written-By – Troup			2:25
A2  Nino Tempo–       Tempo's Tempo		 Written-By – Tempo			2:30
A3  Johnny Olenn–     My Idea Of Love		 Written-By – Olenn			2:22
A4  Johnny Olenn–     I Ain't Gonna Cry No More	 Written-By – Spencer			1:58
A5  Little Richard–   Ready Teddy		 Written-By – Marascalco, Blackwell	2:06
A6  Eddie Fontaine–   Cool It Baby		 Written-By – Coates, Lionel Newman	2:13
A7  Three Chuckles–   Lollipop Lover		 Written-By – Chuckles			1:43
B1  Julie London–     Cry Me A River		 Written-By – Hamilton			2:36
B2  Gene Vincent–     Be-Bop-A-Lula		 Written-By – Vincent, Davis		2:20
B3  Eddie Cochran–    Twenty Flight Rock	 Written-By – Cochran, Fairchild	1:43
B4  Ray Anthony–      Rock Around The Rockpile	 Written-By – Troup			1:54
B5  The Treniers–     Rockin' Is Our Bizness	 Written-By – Trenier			2:36
B6  Fats Domino–      Blue Monday		 Written-By – Domino-Bartholomew	2:12
B7  The Platters–     You'll Never Never Know	 Written-By – Miles, Robi, Williams	2:32
...but I don't know if this dates back to the original 1956-57 period of the film, or was a later release, which could raise the question of whether, for example, the version of "Twenty Flight Rock" was Eddie Cochran's 1956 recording featured in the film, or his 1957 version that was released as a single late that year. 2601:545:8201:6290:0:0:0:B7E (talk) 21:29, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Soundtrack LP?
Talk:Ring Deutscher Pfadfinderinnenverbände

message: : The RDP has no logo or badge. --jergen 08:06, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Logo
Talk:Verband Christlicher Pfadfinder*innen

message: :The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was move. —Nightstallion (?) Seen this already? 09:36, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Italian Scout Federation

message: I checked out the National Scout Organisations, and the name of this organization in English is Italian Scout Federation. I think we should change it to that name.
--evrik 22:09, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Bad translation; literally Italian Federation of the Scout Movement. --jergen 10:04, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: English name
Talk:The Negotiator

message: In the preview of this movie you see Sabian say into a walkie talkie, "Now you have to deal... with both of us."(referring to himself and Roman who is standing beside him) The background is red like the building is on emergency power. This scene also appears to be the same one that was the poster for the movie. Does anyone know what the deal is with this scene not being in the movie at all? WesUGAdawg (talk) 14:17, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The line of dialog was recorded just for the trailer and dubbed over existing footage. The footage was taken from the scene where he's talking to Roman, and he gets Roman to release a hostage by telling the command team, over the walkie talkie, to turn the electricity back on so Roman can use the computer. KerathFreeman (talk) 00:28, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the info. Seems like kind of a cheat but I had wondered about this for years. WesUGAdawg (talk) 02:44, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Preview 

message: I've reverted this edit, which may be an unrevert of a previous reversion. The edit had made several changed, and I based my reversion on just the first change shown in the diff.
*Foremost, I see an incorrect assertion. The edit would assert, "Roman kills a Swat Team Member"; however, about 1h45m into the film, the swat team member is revealed as not having been killed.
*Also, the language in the edit is unencyclopedic and not in keeping with WP:MOS (e.g., "While Roman's talking" and "he & the other" (emphasis added).
Wtmitchell  (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 11:57, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert of anon 73.48.225.235 

message: 67.86.144.157 (talk) 23:09, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Done EvergreenFir (talk) 05:54, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  line
Talk:The Rundown

message: What does this mean? "This was the first WWE Film to ever be able to be produced outside of production." --65.65.223.92 (talk) 03:54, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

message: Can anyone find the fruits references in the movie? Do they really exist?
They look somewhat like a certain breed of Annona to me. 85.250.227.50 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment was added at 18:04, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Konlavos (With a K) 

message: What does "This was the first WWE Film to ever be able to be produced outside of production." mean?  Produced outside of production? --Randal L. Schwartz (talk) 01:38, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I couldn't figure out that sentence either. It's been over five months since this question was posted, with no response, so I just deleted the sentence. --Elysdir (talk) 21:32, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  English please 

message: What references are missing? Can we remove the template? Mikey (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 19:53, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:Collateral Damage (2002 film)

message: The article text says it was released February 8. The infobox says February 4. Which is it? 24.239.130.168 00:39, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the IMDb, it was premiered on Feb-4, which was Monday, and it was finally wide-released on Feb-8 (Friday). I don't know what should be the Wiki-standard for these situations, but I guess it should be February 8. I'm not the article's author either, so anyone check it out and fix it. Thief12 19:59, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, the contradictory statement has been fixed, so to speak. Also, it has been noted that the première was screened on the 4th of Feb.--Qwerty 13:05, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction 

message: I was browsing the television listings for New York City at Zap2It a short time ago and at 4:00 PM today (February 22, 2014) I found this. (The link points to a page on Imgur, to which I uploaded my screencap.) If you can't view the screencap or read the text in the screencap, it shows a listing for a two-hour program titled "Collateral Damage" and the relevant text reads:
(First Aired: Jul. 01, 1995)
A coffee-shop worker discovers the truth behind the Gulf War.
I didn't find an entry for it in Wikipedia or the Internet Movie Database and when I tuned in at 4:00, it was the movie this Wikipedia article is about that started. Does anyone know if a movie that fits the above description exists or existed? Dyspeptic skeptic (talk) 22:02, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is there another movie (possibly one made for TV) with the same title?
Talk:Kindergarten Cop

message: Schwarzenegger received a salary of 12 million dollar from a total budget of 15 million dollar? Gridge (talk) 10:52, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Salary 

message: Nicole Kidman was the original choice for the love interest.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.30.71.94 (talk) 22:10, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nicole Kidman 

message: Perhaps there isn’t anything of note to mention, but the article is missing information on writing, direction, cinematography, and music – other than the soundtrack details. Information on these topics would improve the article’s scope. Twofingered Typist (talk) 21:27, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Details