lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Union Station (Brattleboro, Vermont)

message: This article is about both the current Amtrak stop and the historic Union Station - as they are one and the same. The current Amtrak waiting room is located inside Union Station, as is clearly discussed in the Great American Stations source, and your strongly-worded claim that Union Station is completely divorced from Amtrak use is completely false. The style in which I rewrote the lede is entirely standard for active railroad stations with a historic station building at the site (whether currently used in railroad use or not); there is no precedent for the edits you have made. Outside of the station issue itself, I cannot fathom why you have chosen to remove a  template from an unreferenced section, nor why you have chosen to use psuedoheadings (which are strongly discouraged by the Manual of Style).
I am particularly concerned about your behavior here. Why have you chosen to leave notices at five different WikiProjects over a single pair of reversions, and why have you worded them in a manner usually reserved for "I want more eyes to monitor for bad edits" (i.e, you want others to revert me) rather than a more neutral wording implying "I'd like more opinions about this disagreement"? You are the one who has substantially changed the article from its prior state - my edit largely rewrote existing information in the lede to make it clearer - so I believe the onus is on you to justify why your edit is useful and factually correct. While it is reasonable to discuss what image is best for the infobox - some articles of this type use a front view of the historic building, while others have a platform/train view - again it is your duty to justify your change. I am going to restore my previous version (i.e, the former state of the article with my corrections to the lede), then re-add the Great American Stations source and gallery in a second edit. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 08:15, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subject, image, and formatting
Talk:Slough of Despond

message: Any thoughts on how a link to the source text here at wikisource  might be included? I'm still wrapping my mind around how things are done here. - Parke 13:19, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

message: The article mentions Slough of Despond gettng mentioned in Louisa May Alcott's Hospital Sketches. But it and Pilgrim's Progress are also mentioned extensively in her book Little Women.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:9680:2AB0:74B2:6269:A35B:7B23 (talk) 02:24, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Louisa May 

message: That'd be Genesis's Window off their debut album. AngusCA (talk) 04:47, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do song lyrics count as "Other Literature"?
Talk:Liam Sternberg

message: I've removed the following telegram from User:Briangjob from the article:
This is Brian G Job...I'm just putting up a Page at Job1.com
titled Liam Sternberg...where I'm posting what I remember....
that he told me...as well as what VH1....has in their progs
Brian
Liam likes to use the same "aliases' 4 his work
that VC Fields used ( VC Fields...produced,wrote,directed,and stared in his movies..in FACT...buil;d the FIRST movie studio in Califonia in Nile,CA...where the "famous" Charly Chaplin scene that Robert DOwney Jr. got an Oscar for...
Beverly Hills was ALL...oil wells....HollyWOodLand...wasn'[t even there yet
(don't believe ME...go TO Beverly Hills HS...they STILL have a "pumping' oil well right in the middle of SKewl ! )
--NapoliRoma (talk) 13:50, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed unencyclopedic chunk
Talk:Liam Watson (record producer)

message: Written by liam himself, perhaps?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.83.121.172 (talk) 18:49, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This article was hideously POV, so I've re-written it - same goes for Toe Rag Studios.  Booglamay (talk) - 13:07, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: POV
Talk:Stirrup cup

message: Since the term is used with the indefinite article "a", it can't be a proper noun. Thus, per WP:MOS, the word "cup" in the article title shouldn't be capitalized. Unless there's objection, I'll try to fix this.--Stepheng3 (talk) 21:46, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the proposal was move per request as the title is not a proper noun.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:39, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: The article's title

message: As far as I'm aware the term or concept of a stirrup cup is not distinctively Scottish, let alone Highland. The citation makes no mention of any provenance for the term, thus not supporting the assertion. Surely the term (if used in Scotland much or at all) and the concept are found more widely. Deoch an dorais is the Gaelic term but without the specific implication of being on horseback. Mutt Lunker (talk) 21:00, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is term ''stirrup cup'' Highland?
Talk:Montpelier station (Vermont)

message: Amtrak name it Montpelier-Berlin.--Manfariel (talk) 13:12, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The Amtrak webpage for this station  and the current Vermonter timetable  list the station name as simply "Montpelier". FFM784 (talk) 16:16, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Linda Jo Rizzo

message: She's a singer? I can't hear anyone singing ...217.246.72.53 (talk) 13:22, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Singer" 

message: That's not a discipline I've ever heard of. Could the author mean "nutrition"? Perhaps this was written by someone who thinks in German ("Ernährungswissenschaft")  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.143.58.42 (talk) 09:37, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "nourishing sciences"
Talk:St. Albans station (Vermont)

message: Um. "seven passengers boarded or detrained Amtrak services in St. Albans in FY09, making it the 9th-busiest stop in Vermont." Either just about no-one uses trains in Vermont or there is some mistake here: seven and 9th-busiest really don't seem to go together. --AlisonW (talk) 17:41, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: There's nothing inconsistent about having seven passengers and being the ninth-busiest station. Those are the ridership numbers in Vermont. Mirza Ahmed (talk) 18:56, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mistake?
Talk:Linnéa Handberg Lund

message: This wikipedia article says that Lund was born in both  Hillerød, Denmark and Copenhagen, Denmark. Which is it? 184.75.114.3 (talk) 18:08, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflicting place of birth 
Talk:Lisa Kekaula

message: As in "had a daughter"? It's a really odd thing to say, they welcomed a baby girl"
But maybe that's not what it's supposed to mean... Either way, I don't know so I won't correct it, but this language could do with being changed. 84.9.187.215 (talk) 11:46, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Welcomed a baby girl?
Talk:Lisa Lashes

message: Does it deserve a mention, she used his music without permission and lulz was had. Andy Lowson (talk) 21:26, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Devvo 

message: There isn't an article about the Lisa Lashes song Unbelievable, it is a good song and seems to be popular to be Creamfields.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.16.3.114 (talk) 19:38, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Unbelievable?
Talk:Lissette

message: While there are several internet sources that say Lissette's year of birth is 1949, most of them are based on Wikipedia's source for Lissette's year of birth; but the year of her birth is listed as 1947 in several Spanish web sources:
http://www.mariaargeliavizcaino.com/m-DiccionarioTalentosCubanos.html
http://www.encantodegente.com/fileadmin/archivoespectaculos/espectaculos104.htm
In addition, when Lissette was young and sang with her parents, she used to sing a song that went (in Spanish) something like this "mommy and daddy and one year later the stork brought me", her parents married on 1945 in May, Lissette's year of birth can't possibly be 1949 if she said "one year later" also if you count the months, she was born in March 10, 1947 that means she was born 1 year and 10 months after her parents married which makes sense.  I have teared the internet to pieces looking for an actual trusted source to confirm this; but I can only share what I found and the history behind Lissette's life that I remember from my mother's stories.  This is what's on the second link I gave, which basically says her mother was pregnant on June 1946.
"Llegan a Lima desde Guayaquil en junio de 1946 y ya Olguita tenia tres meses de embarazo que no se le notaba hasta los últimos meses de gestación. Empiezan sus actuaciones en Radio Victoria donde conocen a quien seria su inspiradora con los valses peruanos, Maria de Jesús Vásquez quien le enseña los secretos para su interpretación, y es así que ella incorpora una cantidad de valses peruanos a su repertorio.
Tienen tanto éxito que deciden tener en Lima a quien seria Lissette, gran interprete que heredo ese don de sus padres, nace un 10 de marzo, era la primera hija que luego seria reconocida internacionalmente."
I greatly regret the fact that these sources can't be used in the English Wikipedia due to most of it not possible to be understood by English users, however the Spanish Wikipedia has the wrong year as well.
--Maradan Chronicles Wiki (talk) 23:45, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I found an interesting piece of information, also in Spanish  please take a look at first entry on the attached picture please. --Maradan Chronicles Wiki (talk) 00:35, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of islands of Western Australia, M–Q

message: You have two entries for a 'Mistaken island', one at 20°39′19″S 116°39′42″E and one at 35°3′49″S 117°56′34″E. As they both point to the same article, i think someone must be mistaken!
Baffle gab1978 (talk) 18:58, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mistaken Island...
Talk:Little Willie John

message: His debut single was in 1953 on the Pride label co-owned by Dizzy Gillespie https://www.discogs.com/Willie-John-And-The-Three-Lads-And-A-Lass-Mommy-What-Happened-To-Our-Christmas-Tree-Jingle-Bells-/master/1582839  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.90.31.248 (talk) 16:36, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Debut single

message: How can it be said that John was "active" until his death in 1968 when he was arrested and locked up from 1964 on? 68.99.243.245 (talk) 05:10, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: On the grounds that it is not pertinent to John's notabilty, I deleted the following phrase from the introduction: "the latter covered in 1958 by Peggy Lee." Jwicklatz (talk) 01:26, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Not really a problem.  Personally, I loath the unnecessarily loose use of the term "cover version" for much later, quite different, versions of songs.  Ghmyrtle (talk) 08:07, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion of mention of Lee's version of "Fever" in intro
Talk:Thorough

message: I pretty much wrote this entire article, and I'm fairly sure that I didn't include anything from the Nuttall Encyclopaedia. MC 23:04(GMT), 6th September 2007.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.198.233.210 (talk)  
Re the first sentence: Wentworth's Thorough policy actually applied to Ireland, where he was the Lord Deputy, and not to England; that was more Laud's territory. He was certainly in favour of absolute monarchy in England, but he was more concerned with his Irish duties and with using the policy to establish centralised rule (reinforcing the monarchy's authority), root out corruption and personal interests, and weaken the power (and wealth) of the Catholics. In the absence of any comment/disagreement, I'll update the article shortly to reflect this.
Wrightbyname (talk) 17:56, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Very poor quality discussion of the Thorough policy. This was the government of England during the Personal Rule. The key player is Strafford, I am unclear about what the significance of Arminianism is as there is no connection between this and the Wikipedia article on it. 
I don't think it is appropriate to refer to Marxism. That is centuries later and there isn't any connection between the English civil war and Marxism. Divisions tended to be regional and religious based, certainly not classed based. Palfreman (talk) 17:44, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poor quality
Talk:Liu Sola

message: Basic information to add to this article:  in which city/country she is based. 173.88.246.138 (talk) 20:10, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: To add to article
Talk:Marius Grinius

message: Not sure that the subject meets the criteria in WP:BIO.  The article provides only one secondary source.  The primary sources simply confirm appointments. I note, however, that this is not the only article on Canadian diplomats. Skeezix1000 15:07, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Per WP:BIO#Diplomats, it appears he is notable as he has "participated in a significant way" in the North Korean nuclear weapons program negotiations: source. Jfire (talk) 03:58, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Republic of West Florida

message: The article currently states that the flag of the Republic of West Florida was "later" called the Bonnie Blue Flag. This oversimplifies the question. Please see Talk:Bonnie Blue Flag for more on the issue of naming. In brief, the nickname "Bonnie Blue" dates from 1861, not 1810. The identity of the West Florida and Bonnie Blue flags has been assumed but nor proved. In 2006 the state of Louisiana passed a law linking the nickname "Bonnie Blue" to the 1810 flag. — ℜob C. alias ÀLAROB 17:25, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The name of the flag 

message: I was just copyediting this article, and I noticed how a lot of text is in quotes. It does fit with the quotation parts from actual people's perspectives, but the random parts with quotation marks and no indication that they are indeed quotes. Do these fit, or should they be removed? EMachine03 (talk) 22:35, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Most, if not all, are exact quotes from source material accompanied by citations to those sources. In this type of academic writing, any material that is an exact quote from a source publication should be shown in quotation marks. I would not change or remove any that are of this nature. Jeff in CA (talk) 14:30, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

text: Or if there is some compelling reason to reduce the number of quotes, paraphrase the idea. Prof. Mc (talk) 14:01, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Random quotation marks
Talk:Vedanga

message: #Jyotisha (): astrology and astronomy, dealing particularly with the auspicious days for performing sacrifices.
Jyotishya - does NOT particularly deal with auspicious days for performing sacrifices as listed above. That is just ONE of its many uses. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.92.136.110 (talk • contribs) 
it's spelled Jyotisha, and here we are discussing Jyotisha as a Vedanga discipline, not modern Jyotisha. --dab (𒁳) 16:34, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Veturia

message: Your article does a good job of telling a story.  Check for some grammatical errors (e.g. descended, reacived).  Also, it would be helpful to have more links to other Wikipedia pages for unfamiliar or important terms (e.g. matron, Volscians).  Try to add a time period for when this event occurred to give the reader a reference point in the span of Roman history.  While I understand there may not be much information about Veturia, see if she is mentioned in any other contexts besides this encounter with the Volscians.   This near attack of Rome is already recounted in the article about Coriolanus.  Perhaps you can expand on how she became a “model of Roman feminine virtue.”  Is she referenced in any celebrations of feminine virtue?
Connor Kobeski 165.124.113.65 03:55, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lobão (musician)

message: There is no such word as "attriction" in English. From the context, I thought "controversy" would be an appropriate word, so that's what I changed it to. If that doesn't convey the right meaning, please change it to something more appropriate. But please use an actual English word. --emw 16:44, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changed the non-word "attriction" 

message: Since he declared he's no longer a vegetarian (http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=7ACDD3E7BBD6E0C3&search_query=mtv+debate+carne), I've removed him from "Brazilian vegetarians" category. Robfbms (talk) 17:03, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  No longer a vegetarian 
Talk:Isomaltulose

message: Is it a reducing sugar?144.30.79.141 (talk) 15:13, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Based on Reducing sugar, a reducing sugar must have a free aldehyde group or a free ketone group. This article does not state that it has either of these. Isomaltulose is ordinary sugar (dextrose) with a enzyme-modified disaccharide bond. Is the fact that Isomaltulose is not a reducing sugar significant for inclusion in this article or not? David Spector (talk) 03:24, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

text: I have found a reference that claims that Isomaltulose is a reducing sugar. David Spector (talk) 15:57, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

text: The ring structure of the component fructose opens into a linear structure with a carbonyl group as in ketones and aldehydes making isomaltulose a reducing sugar. Note that the structure shown for isomaltulose indicates this. Anamei Kent, 9 February 2018.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anamie kent2 (talk • contribs) 14:44, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I notice quite a bit of information lifted directly from the company's website.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.207.91.158 (talk) 17:48, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. It certainly needs work. I added some cleanup templates. -Tartaros (talk) 17:54, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this page a commercial? 

message: One of the paragraphs begins "The last decade has had considerable interest in isomaltulose". Apart from needing to specify when the last decade was, I do not think this sounds good English, and I am wondering whether it would be better as "In the last decade, researchers have shown considerable interest in isomaltulose". Vorbee (talk) 10:35, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Last decade
Talk:Lóránd Fráter

message: I'm mostly gone from this site, but I landed on this for various reasons. I've maybe changed what this article is about, but an eighteenth century composer as described seems likely to not exist or be contradictory. This person however existed, though maybe more as Lóránd than Lóránt, so seemed worth doing.T. Anthony (talk) 06:34, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
Talk:Lori Lewis

message: So what year exactly she was born in? 1972 or 1984?
Can't judge by the way she looks  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.190.102.42 (talk) 13:45, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of Birth  
Talk:Lou and Peter Berryman

message: Just a note to say that L&P are coming out with a complete book of their songs.
Also, someone might like to note that other groups have recorded their songs e.g. The Red Hot Chili Peppers version of the L&P Berryman song, Naked and Nude.Henrysteinberger (talk) 03:43, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:Writers who illustrated their own writing

message: Shouldn't Charles M. Schulz be included in this category??  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.114.58.46 (talk) 23:10, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

message: Guy Murchie, author of Song of the Sky and Music of the Spheres, definitely belongs here. Unfree (talk) 02:55, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Guy Murchie
Talk:Lou Monte

message: In the  "Success" section, mention is made of "Paul Revere's Horse (Ba-Cha-Ca-Loop)". The correct name is spelled Bacigalupo, not Ba-Cha-Ca-Loop. 96.235.173.81 (talk) 03:09, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Bacigalupo
Talk:Zephon (angel)

message: * Zephon in the Book of Enoch
I haven't found any reference to Zephon in any of the three books of Enoch. He seems to be a character invented by Milton for Paradise Lost. All the internet references to Zephon appearing in the Book of Enoch are actually links to this same article. I suggest changing it.
88.1.42.252 (talk) 05:07, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

message: Was not Yam cast out instead of Yahu? any sources to this?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2804:7F4:5086:47CB:CC99:7E53:9666:A316 (talk) 15:10, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  cast out
Talk:Chinese pole

message: Any idea how old Chinese poles is? Was it invented in the last century or is it older? Thanks. Dmcq (talk) 14:00, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: All of the links are commercial SPAM.  FEDEC, SimplyCircus and PoleWiki would all be better resources.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.119.212.114 (talk) 16:59, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links 

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Leosvel et Diosmani - 4.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on December 16, 2013. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2013-12-16. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:39, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Leosvel et Diosmani - 4.jpg]] to appear as POTD 
Talk:Mahākāśyapa

message: This is an appalling article. There are dozens of early texts that feature Mahakassapa, as well as an extensive legendary biogrpahy, all of which are ignored in this article, which uses only very late east Asian sources, which have nothing to do with the historical figure.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.44.28.32 (talk) 20:52, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early texts 
Talk:Doclean Academy of Sciences and Arts

message: This article from a Serbian news website reports that in 2015 the academy merged into the CANU. Is it true? Ivario (talk) 12:23, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Nothing is official yet, as far as I know. Sadkσ (talk is cheap) 12:26, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger into CANU?
Talk:Zindikites

message: The article text, sourced to a 1907 encyclopaedia, says:
"Zindikites is a Muslim heretical sect, who disbelieve in Allah, deny the resurrection, and do not believe in life after death. The Zindikites used to be called the Mazdakite, Manichean and Gnostic communities."
The 1907 encyclopaedia is just wrong. Zindiq, Zandik etc. is a derogatory term applied to undesirable sects, there has never been a specific sect that officially refers to itself as "Zindikite". No sect could ever "disbelieve in Allah, deny the resurrection and not believe in life after death" and still pretend to be "Muslim". Nor could these ideas be the defining tenets of any religious sect at all. Rather, these are just the standard Muslim accusations directed against "kafirs" ever since the Qur'an, and they have been directed at many different groups. Of these, neither Mazdakites, nor gnostics, nor Manichaeans can be said to "disbelieve in God" and "in life after death". We already have articles about the terms Zindiq and Zandik, this one should simply be deleted.--91.148.159.4 (talk) 20:53, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Slough railway station

message: I have changed this from 6 to 5, as Platform 6 is no longer in use. Smurfmeister (talk) 17:13, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Platforms in use