lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
File talk:Conniedobbs.JPG

message: Fair Use rationale, as defined under Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline:
* Is the image being used as the primary means of visual identification of the subject or topic? (eg, a corporate logo, DVD box art) Rather, is it being used to illustrate a particular topic? (eg, a screenshot from a movie)
The image is a depiction of Connie Dobbs, J.R. "Bob" Dobbs' "first and still his primary wife," whose importance has increased in the Church of the SubGenius to the point where an entire chapter of the new SubGenius book, The SubGenius Psyclopaedia of Slack: The Bobliographon, is dedicated to her.  (Chapter 5: "Connie")  While Connie Dobbs may not warrant her own article in Wikipedia at this time, the use of her image in the article on "Bob" (which in turn has many links from Wikipedia articles and user pages) emphasizes her importance.--Modemac 16:25, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Sydney Youngblood

message: Apparently this track has been classified by totally uninformed people as a "house track". Sorry, but its speed barely reaches 120 BPM, and its sound-samples and mixing style don't put it in that class either. I strongly protest that such a denomination should be given to so many dance-tracks that aren't even remotely related to "house" music. Obviously the people doing that have not been there at the time these songs were hits, but honestly, how one can even think that this is "house music" is beyond me. 146.50.227.64 (talk) 07:57, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: House music
Talk:Bertilimumab

message: I have a vandalism revert: . This anonymous user has removed the  template. --Blake3522 08:37, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  {{user|61.1.108.203}} 
Talk:Β-Methylphenethylamine

message: It is described as a designer drug, but this is not true, you find it in this tree: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acacia_rigidula. So this should be corrected.
:If you read this carefully, you will NOT find any mention of β-methylphenethylamine. N-methyl-β-phenethylamine is not the same thing! The findings reported in this article are highly dubious, in any case (see discussion in WP entry for amphetamine).Xprofj (talk) 15:29, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: does anyone have a source of any faqs, reviews on this compound?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.72.240.42 (talk) 12:27, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  amphetamine like activity? 

message: I deleted the original reference to the presence of β-methylphenethylamine in Texas acacia species because this compound is NOT actually mentioned in the article. Furthermore, this article itself is highly dubious (see discussion under WP entry for amphetamine).
I also deleted the comments about β-methylphenethylamine being a "stimulant" drug, since there is no reference in the literature concerning this property. If there is "anecdotal" evidence, then it should be entered as such, with the appropriate citation.
Xprofj (talk) 15:29, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Latest revision to article

message: There is a scientific error in the line that reads:
The β-methyl compound also had ~ 2 x the broncho-constricting power of amphetamine (as measured using the isolated rabbit lung)
It should read:
The β-methyl compound also had ~ 2 x the broncho-dilating power of amphetamine (as measured using the isolated rabbit lung)
Reason is:
Stimulants are vaso-constrictors on blood vessels but broncho-dilators when it comes to lungs.
Therapeutic example is ventolin (Beta agonist) and Theophylline a natural stimulant.
I have amended the page.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.168.5.188 (talk) 19:42, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Science errors
Talk:Betahistine

message: There has been controversy about the effectiveness of betahistine in the treatment of vertigo and many doctors will not prescribe it, believing it to cause only a placebo effect; this should be mentioned in the article.  There are many examples on the web, but I cannot speak to the reliability of them and am uncomfortable adding the section based solely on my own Internet research.  One such article can be found here, search for "Betahistine" within the document and the first hit you get mentions some of the issues. --Rob (talk) 22:40, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: What makes you believe you that "many people who suffer from this disease" don't get enough exercise and have a poor diet? Is that just a wild guess, or do you have any evidence to support it? It is very generous of you to blame the victim for the disease that is ruining their lives. MisterSpike (talk) 20:39, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy 

message: When searching for "Serc", you get redirected to Sch%C3%BCtzen_am_Gebirge.  The redirect page should probably be changed to a disambiguation page, but I'm uncertain how to go about that.  If anybody's looking for a probably 5-minute project, here you go! --Rob (talk) 22:42, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation 

message: Please accept the edits to this page (February 15, 2013). My name is Scott Stoffel, and I work at Abbott Laboratories in Corporate Public Affairs, and the edits I am providing are all factual, based upon review of the page with Abbott scientists with expertise in this area. If you have questions, please do not hesitate to access my contact information, found here: http://abbott.com/news-media/contacts.htm ScottStoffelAbbott (talk) 21:07, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Abbott Laboratories

message: If true, should be added to the article, methinks. -- Wesha (talk) 14:50, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: That is described in the "Society and culture" section. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 17:09, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Allegedly, it is not available in the USA.
Talk:Kai Islands

message: Not a WP:RS in sight - cannot possibly be start level - it could be either WP:OR or WP:HOAX for anyone who checks the article as it is SatuSuro 14:28, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: Worked to rearrange the information to be a bit more cohesive. Worked on grammar and flow where possible. Some sections need help from an expert on the topic, as the names and languages are not easy to correct or follow for a non-native. Lots of citations needed still. Russty11 (talk) 19:35, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy Edit
Talk:Bexarotene

message: I have several problems with this section: 
:Bexarotene is indicated for the treatment of cutaneous manifestations of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma in people who are refractory to at least one prior systemic therapy (oral) and for the topical treatment of cutaneous lesions in patients with CTCL who have refractory or persistent disease after other therapies or who have not tolerated other therapies (topical).
First, it's too technical for a non-professional reader. I had to read it twice. Why not say "skin" instead of "cutaneous"? 
Second, this is simply the FDA indication. It's not the only medical use. As the introduction indicates, there are other uses. (In fact it seems to be cut and pasted from the package insert.) 
Third, it's so detailed that it sounds like giving the practice of medicine. --Nbauman (talk) 01:51, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Medical uses 

message: In the History section
A 2008 pilot study showed improvements in positive, negative, dysphoric, and extrapyramidal symptoms in schizophrenia patients receiving neuroleptic drug treatment. The medication was recognized as safe by laboratory measures with the exception of increased total cholesterol serum level.Bexarotene as add-on to antipsychotic treatment in schizophrenia patients: a pilot open-label trial. Clin Neuropharmacol. 2008 Jan-Feb;31(1):25-33.
was removed for not having a medical review source (per WP:MEDRS). A review in Molecular Psychiatry, before the study, talks about the drug as an add-on in schizophrenia. Gaba amine (talk) 04:16, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Schizophrenia 
Talk:Sunrise Middle School (Oregon)

message: Suggest merge to North Clackamas School District. Katr67 16:21, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure about a merge, because I am trying to make it look like the Clackamas High School article at the moment. Sunrise and CHS are about 1/4 of a 1/4 mile apart from each other. So I am trying to make them look alike, and I have asked the creator of the CHS article to help me out. §†SupaSoldier†§ 18:46, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal
Talk:Biopharmaceutics Classification System

message: "Biopharmaceutics Classification System of Solubility Metric"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.209.131.243 (talk) 21:31, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

message: I came to this page knowing virtually knowing about BCS, and have left rather confused. The text seems to first say that there are four classes - based on permeability and solubility. And then says classification based on solubility, permeability and dissolution. I'm left very confused - could anyone clarify? Icarusgeek (talk) 18:13, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I am not certain myself.  However it is clear that solubility and dissolution are closely related.  For a compound with a very slow dissolution rate, the time it takes for it to dissolve is longer than the time available in the GI tract when it can be absorbed. Effectively this compound has low solubility regardless of what its equilibrium solubility is.  Hence it might be more reasonable to classify compounds as (high solubility/high dissolution rate) vs everything else (high solubility/low dissolution rate + low solubility/high dissolution rate + low solubility/low dissolution rate). Then the combination of two solubility/dissolution groups X two permeability groups = four BCS  groups.  Boghog (talk) 19:21, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Solubility, permeability and dissolution
Talk:Bisacodyl

message: mechanism? Tkjazzer (talk) 06:23, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  mechanism? 

message: Missing: As I write this, the words "side effects," "safety," "safe," "over-the-counter," and/or "over the counter" do not appear anywhere in the article. In the United States, it is sold over the counter cheaply at Walmart, for example, 88 cents a bottle, so it must be relatively safe? 5Q5 (talk) 14:20, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: @5Q5 2600:1700:9BE0:49F0:3574:BB70:6505:749A (talk) 18:17, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Side effects / safety 

message: I'm reading a book set in the early 1900s and the protagonist takes something called a "liver pill" when she finds out she's pregnant. It doesn't end up being effective. Since "liver pill" redirects here, I was wondering if anyone knows if this substance had any historical use as an abortificant. Clovermoss (talk) 01:50, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical aboratificant? 

message: Took one and had the poop of the century 46.30.183.180 (talk) 22:35, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brilliant for making poo
Talk:Steady Ground

message: This article only sources from pages created by the band; it makes it look an awful much like SPAM.  I am not sure if it should be deleted but I wanted you to take a look. Brusegadi 00:46, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bisoprolol

message: This Bisoprolol article really should mention (or link) information on the 'Ziac' version, containing HCTZ. (Bisoprolol/HCTZ) It's a diuretic addition to the basic Bisoprolol, and is a commonly prescribed version of the hypertension drug.
72.211.223.193 (talk) 16:29, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Ziac (Bisoprolol and Hydrochlorothiazide) medication

message: Under Side Effects, we are told this:
"(may be less common with those with ISA, see above)"
but there is no explanation above. So, what is 'ISA'?
Rosa Lichtenstein (talk) 16:29, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Side effects

message: I'm unfamiliar with the culture of making changes, but I've found the following information to be incorrect:
 09:00, 16 December 2007 Janke (talk | contribs) (2,259 bytes) (+ affects doping tests)
+"Bisoprolol will give a positive result in doping tests.[9]"
The reference is incorrect and I cannot find any literature referencing this effect.  It should be removed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.181.230.7 (talk) 14:22, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Since beta-blockers such as bisoprolol are banned by many athletic organizations (see for example List of drugs banned from the Olympics), it seems perfectly reasonable to me to state that "bisoprolol will give a positive result in doping tests".  -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:05, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Doping tests
Category talk:Motorcycle clubs

message: Can a link to the Ulysses Club be included on this page?. It appears elsewhere in the Wikipeadea site, but not on this listing. Thanks. 152.91.8.100 06:44, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've changed the category that Ulysses Club is in from Category:Motorcyclists organizations to this one Category:Motorcycle clubs Pickle 14:35, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Blue Pill

message: * The page text reads that merging blue pill and blue mass was suggested (seemingly by user Disputantum) but no ratinale was provided. As I found the page when searching for The Matrix stuff, I regard this as a bad idea. Rather move out the medicine part of the blue pill page to the blue mass page and redirect to the blue pill page to redpill like bluepill already does. -- Mainzelmann (talk) 18:35, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've merged these.  The Matrix reference belongs in disambiguation. Wnt (talk) 21:35, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Bretylium

message: Ran into Bretylium for the treatment of ventricular fibrillation, didn't see any advantage of its existance. Most information there ought to be fused here. --Bobjgalindo (talk) 20:33, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree, looks like the other page was created as a school project or something, should be shortened and moved here. 69.143.35.117 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 23:22, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fuse 
Talk:Brimonidine

message: what is "AC"?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.212.165.122 (talk) 04:24, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Adenylate cyclase  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.31.151.229 (talk) 09:40, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  AC 

message: Can you purchase eyedrops in a generic name 2600:6C58:737F:33EB:58DB:6096:AB48:1D64 (talk) 22:03, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can  you buy these eyedrops in a generic format?
Talk:Brotizolam

message: In all of the examples I have seen, P2S5 converts the amide to a thioamide, not a thiol.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.30.243.179 (talk) 20:28, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: In this image in this article, P2S5 does convert an amide into a thioamide.   The thioamide is just drawn as the tautomer which has a C=N double bond/C-S single bond, rather than the more common C=S double bond/C-N single bond.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:09, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mistake in Synthesis Image?
Talk:Budesonide/formoterol

message: Why do we list "Insomnia" under common side-effects and "Difficulty to fall asleep" under uncommon side-effects? --Guy Macon (talk) 23:09, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Insomnia 

message: What does the drug cost? Is there any outlook on price changes in the foreseeable future?
Thanks --Lbeaumont (talk) 00:50, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cost 

message: I have gone through and removed a mass of primary sources once and left requests for the accounts in question to use secondary sources. Now we have a whole new group of accounts adding the same primary sources again. 
*Primary source 
*Primary source 
*Primary source 
*Primary source 
There are secondary sources on this topic.
Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 05:52, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Secondary sources

message: "There were previous concerns that the use of Budesonide/Formoterol increases the risk of Influenza, however this has been disproven in later studies"
*Primary source 
*Secondary source  ."
And the secondary source is even newer than the primary one. Also User:Erikajmarsh why did you remove the product monograph? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 06:01, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Budesonide/formoterol&type=revision&diff=955876014&oldid=955869457&diffmode=source This uses a primary source to refuse a secondary one]

message: User:Nundah123 you:
*Primary source 
*This source which does not mention formoterol and is a primary source 
*This primary source https://www.jacionline.org/article/S0091-6749(14)01105-1/fulltext
We already had it sufficient supported by a secondary source. No need for the primary sources. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 06:07, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: This edit[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Budesonide/formoterol&diff=next&oldid=955901790&diffmode=source]

message: User:Megan.sharkey11 this is a primary source from 2016. As is this. 
We already state that the concerns were removed in 2017 and no need for the primary sources. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 06:33, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Well this is a review it is a little old and it is unclear what you are using it to try to support? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 06:35, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: And this edit[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Budesonide/formoterol&diff=next&oldid=955938643&diffmode=source]

message: Influenza was erroneously listed as a side-effect in the introduction. Medication cannot cause the spontaneous incidence of influenza virus as a side effect. I have updated this with a list of the side effects acknowledged as common side effects and provided references. SquattyRoo (talk) 18:33, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction: Side Effects 
Talk:Street Hawk

message: Just thought I would set up a talk page for Streethawk, BTW have any of you signed the petition to 
get Streethawk on DvD, link at the bottom of main Street hawk page.
:Seems like there could be some mention of how the whole "super vehicle" thing was a fad/cliche in the mid 80s? 68.33.1.90 (talk) 03:52, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Bumetanide

message: External Reference http://www.meds-help.com/bumetanide/ is a nonexistant page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.119.102.76 (talk) 19:29, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! Appears resolved.―Biochemistry🙴❤ 03:35, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Ext ref
Talk:Α-Bungarotoxin

message: created this page to unify the snake venom alpha neurotoxins. Added a history section (great article by CC Chang), types, mechanism, structure.
this section could also be better integrated with nicotinic acetylcholine receptors for a better understanding of the receptor structure and mechanism of opening/blockage.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fourswedish (talk • contribs) 01:46, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: December 2011
Talk:Gadiara

message: Gadiara is the sweetest riverside picnic sport of West Bengal. So if WB Govt. will be taken a good step in devolopment of gadiara to make a clean city (by build river bridge Gadiara +nurpur+genyokhali) then 3 districts 's people get it's oppurtunity.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Totannandi55 (talk • contribs) 02:07, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Future of Gadiara
Talk:Busulfan

message: Anyone have any info on busulfan lung that they could add to the article?   I know it can show up 3 years after using busulfan, and it is fatal...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.178.231.40 (talk) 21:44, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  busulfan lung 
Talk:Butyrophenone

message: Domperidon isn't a butyrophenon derivative; hence it doesn't belong here. It could be mentioned, since its structure was developed apart butyrophenone antidopamninics, but it isn't really a butyrophenone.--84.163.78.126 16:57, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Domperidon is not a butyrophenone derivative. 

message: Butyrophenone (1-Phenyl-1-butanone, without substitution) has no relevant affinities for dopamine receptors; hence, I change the first sentence of this article.
Further, I change the brief description of domperidone, since it really isn't a direct butyrophenone derivative.--84.163.78.65 (talk) 23:54, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Butyrophenone ''per se'' isn't antidopaminic 

message: I have cite-tagged the statement that this drug is 200 times more potent than Thorazine. The wikipedia article for Benperidol says 75-100 times stronger. Hopefully, someone can come in with a source that will clear this up.Mk5384 (talk) 03:42, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Benperidol
Talk:Amlodipine/atorvastatin

message: I've removed the "Controversy" section which suggests that combination drugs are "money grabs". This information is more a criticism of Fixed dose combination in general (and I note that similar information is already a part of that article). Additionally, the section was completely unreferenced and made several dubious claims. If you want to re-add the information, please provide proof and explain specifically how it relates to Caduet. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 21:36, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia is not a soapbox. Unless you can provide some proof in reliable sources of a controversy surrounding Caduet, that section shouldn't be re-added. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 03:30, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Here[] is a Wall Street Journal article outlining Pfizer's plan to switch Norvasc users to Caduet in order to increase profits. Here[ is a Washington Post article also relating to the marketing ploy. I'm not making this stuff up.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.217.3.165 (talk) 15:34, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Controversy" section
Talk:The Crackpots and These Women

message: https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/01/the-real-story-of-the-white-house-and-the-big-block-of-cheese/384676/ is a source that contradicts the information currently on the page. It states the cheese was from one Colonel Thomas Meacham, citing http://mentalfloss.com/article/27228/andrew-jacksons-big-block-cheese .  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spiffulent (talk • contribs) 02:00, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of big block of cheese day
Talk:Colin Waterson

message: There are a number of other notable people called Waterson (mainly musicians,co-incidentally) and a band, The Watersons.  Waterson should be a dab page.--JBellis (talk) 20:56, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Why is this controversial? It seems to be straight forward. In addition to musicians there is the artist Alicia Waterson, the MP Alfred Waterson, the London publisher John Waterson (who died in 1656), Edward Waterson (who died in 1593 and has been beatified by the Roman Catholic Church), and others.  In addition there is the town/village Waterson, Pennsylvania, United States   --Bejnar (talk) 15:16, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

text: → Moved to Colin Waterson. I'll create a disambig page at Waterson. --Bob Mellish (talk) 02:05, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: Hello. This page is listed under my full name Colin Waterson and I would like for it to be changed to my Artist Name 'Waterson'
How do I do this? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Colinwaterson (talk) 15:35, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change  Page name to WATERSON 
Talk:Siti binti Saad

message: An editor has charged the following site as being spam or commercial in nature:
http://groups.msn.com/SitiBintiSaad/yourwebpage1.msnw
The site is merely a fan's page devoted to the artist.  There is no nefarious commercial character to the page.
Hence, I am reverting the reference.  Dogru144 01:35, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Not spam