Talk:Lwów Ghetto

message: "Lemberg Ghetto" 500/"Lviv Ghetto" 1,000/"Lwow Ghetto" 4,000. I suggest renaming this article to "Lwów Ghetto" (which was the city's name before WWII). Comments? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  18:58, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: agree.--Jacurek (talk) 22:30, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: I have removed a paragraph of unsourced/unreferenced waffle which offers unsubstantiated opinion on sources so as to downplay Ukrainian involvement in the events. This is effectively WP:OR and is not relevant or appropriate for the article. Of course sources can be contested, but only if similarly 'encyclopaedc' sources can be quted in support of such contest. I have also made it clear in the text, what Breitman clearly states in the source quoted, that Ukrainians took part in the series of pogroms.Clearly there is a lot of work left to do on this article - I am very surprised it has been given a B-class (particularly in its previous state) --Smerus (talk) 19:46, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit 

message: , , , , , , ,
constitute edit warring and a violation of the WP:3RR rule. Additionally they're not particularly constructive and may even border on vandalism. They are comprised of removal of an important image for no reason and adding "citation needed" tags to the first sentence of the lede - basically for the title of the article itself. If there's any reason for these edits what so ever I would invite the editor to justify them on the talk page here. Volunteer Marek  15:50, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This response is not actually helpful. Volunteer Marek  16:31, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  recent edits by an ip 

message: Virtually the entire section that goes out of its way to imply mass ukrainian collaboration (by use of weasel words such as 'some') is without citation and is largely as slanted as it is unsubstantiated.  I am not taking a position on the history - what I am claiming is that it is very obvious that whoever wrote that section had an axe to grind and the result is, well, slanted and unencyclopedic and should be heavily revised if not scrapped and re-written in a more neutral and less tabloid fashion.  The statement that includes the phrase "100%" is particularly unencyclopedic.  I have peppered the area with many citation needed tags, giving those who have been working on this opportunity to back up and perhaps modify their statements into something more suitable for wikipedia.  However, if i return in a few weeks and it is as it is, I will remove it and place the appropriate tags indicating that a vesion worthy of wikipedia is needed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.44.120.172 (talk) 06:06, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: *Drive-by tagging is not how we do things around here. Instead of trying to impose your personal views, I suggest you do your own research online and provide even more reliable third-party sources whenever necessary. Poeticbent talk 21:58, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations Needed 

message: This article is extremely racist against Ukrainians.  For example, "...hundreds of years of pent-up Ukrainian hatred for the Jewish population".  Does this "hatred" include Cardinal Sheptytsky, who risked his own life to rescue thousands of Jews during World War II?  This is inaccurate, amateurish, and sorely lacking a neutral POV.184.147.234.2 (talk) 01:45, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: A marginal note. Timothy Snyder wrote: Sheptyts’kyi welcomed the Nazis; he believed in the Waffen-SS and saved... "dozens of Jews"...  Please bring in reliable, web accessible third-party sources, and we'll see what we can do.  Poeticbent talk 04:08, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Racism Should Be Removed

message: Ye standard quickfail due to unreferenced paras. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 17:51, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: B-class review

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Lwów Ghetto. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130512233441/http://www.glaukopis.pl/pdf/czytelnia/NeighboursEveOfTheHolocaust.pdf to http://www.glaukopis.pl/pdf/czytelnia/NeighboursEveOfTheHolocaust.pdf
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.mankurty.com/fridpl.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120307103305/http://www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/article.php?ModuleId=10005171 to http://www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/article.php?ModuleId=10005171
*Added  tag to http://www1.yadvashem.org/about_holocaust/chronology/1939-1941/1941/chronology_1941_18.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101106061357/http://www.mankurty.com/fridpl.html to http://www.mankurty.com/fridpl.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:20, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Lwów Ghetto. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160208215116/http://www.sztetl.org.pl/en/selectcity/ to http://www.sztetl.org.pl/en/selectcity/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:21, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Preserving here by providing this link; my rationale was: "c/e; shortening excessive exposition". --K.e.coffman (talk) 03:28, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see how most of this text was 'excessive'. WP:NOTPAPER. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 14:02, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  December 2019 edit 

message: Preserving here by providing this link. Sources were poor and some of the content dubious, including a difficult-to-understand (apparent?) conspiracy theory. --K.e.coffman (talk) 02:06, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrites, June 2020