Talk:Feminist art movement in the United States

message: Wikipedia coverage of contemporary art is generally insufficient. In my own small way, I have begun to create articles about subjects with which I have some familiarily. I has been distressed about the lack of coverage of women artists and of this movement which was extremely important. There are now many project created to address the issue of documenting feminist art and women artists. Wikipedia is just one more place where information needs to be put.
I only had enough time to BEGIN this article. I appeal to the hundreds of others who are familiar with this movement to add to this article as I shall do over the next few weeks and months. Sue Maberry 18:42, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: I am wondering if I can get comment on whether it is accurate to refer in the article to the LA Women's Building as "a prominent museum known for its displays of feminist art." Correct me if I am wrong- it wasn't a museum?
Thanks! Mollificent (talk) 22:40, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A little late here, but, you can learn more about that here, now: Woman's Building SarahStierch (talk) 06:42, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  la women's building? 

message: hello, seeking feedback on a new page on feminist art in australia, please do contribute... australian feminist art timeline thanks all.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Femarttimeline (talk • contribs) 04:55, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Australian context 

message: Hi everyone. On Wikipedia we generally don't like timelines like the one featured here. Also, the bibliography is just too long. I'd like to start widdling it down. I really only thing we need to focus on the biggest and best books about feminist art, then we can provide links to other bibliographies in the external link section.  Please let me know your thoughts. It's just painful to read - imagine reading this on your mobile phone! Also, I'm thinking we should perhaps rename this article "feminist art movement in the United States" as there were feminist art movements in other countries, even if at different periods outside the 1970s. Thoughts? SarahStierch (talk) 18:40, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: These are my thoughts exactly. The article should be renamed "feminist art movement in the United States" as it only really talks about the States. I have removed the long, ref'd timeline listing and will reduce the bibliography to books. My sense is that there is a whack of spam in their as editors have added their own works in. Span (talk) 12:26, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean up of this article 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Feminist art movement in the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130512234951/http://www.genders.org/g32/g32_bailey.html to http://www.genders.org/g32/g32_bailey.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140113182414/http://www.fresnostatenews.com/archive/2009/08/feministart.htm to http://www.fresnostatenews.com/archive/2009/08/feministart.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:47, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This section (which may present original research?) cries out for citations.  Its capitalization of "Feminist Art Movement" is at odds with the style adopted for the phrase elsewhere in the article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.17.179.75 (talk) 22:59, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Feminist Art Movement in 2018