lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Joseph Barsabbas

message: He gets all three of his names in the New Testament for all history to see, but not a smidgeon of his actual life. How would you like that? Okay, nobody's going to know a single thing about you besides that you lost out on becoming the 13th apostle (oh yeah, and that you followed Jesus, good for you!)... but gosh darn it, they'll for sure know BOTH your nicknames AND your real name, too!  Matt Yeager ♫ (Talk?) 23:09, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have restored the deleted text that covers this point.--Wetman (talk) 20:59, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Strange

message: Ioustos seems to me to be Latin rather than Greek... Imerologul Valah (talk) 23:54, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ancient Greek??? Ioustos
Talk:-izzle

message: What a load of B***** The term shizzle my nizle comes from Cartoon charater scooby do. FACT check out the old versions and you will see where im coming from  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.133.1.176 (talk) 01:58, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Looks like this page has been vandalised.  Please fix, someone!84.13.215.134 (talk) 13:23, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  shizzle 

message: Just pointing that out.
-- Mik 20:04, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The early forms of Iz, as used in Frankie Smith's songs are based on a child language form sometimes known as Pig Greek or Double Dutch. See ubbi Dubbi for variations. Comedian Bill Cosby's, Fat Albert character Mushmouth spoke based on the use of ubbi dubbi, a variation of double dutch. --Lendorien 22:22, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Also referred to as "Dogg Latin". 

message: In an episode of South Park, Chef gives a humorous history of the use of -izzle, suggesting that it is language intended to baffle white people.  This should be mentioned in the Pop Culture section if someone can find the exact quote. Lurlock (talk) 04:47, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Clearly anything South Park related would be a valuable inclusion for this page.  I hope you can find a source.  I looked on Youtube briefly, but no luck.  Fo shizzle we can get some South Park izzle into this artizzlecle. :) (Wallamoose (talk) 16:22, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flibbity Flobbity Floo 

message: "Nigga" is censored but "Nizzle" is not...plenty of other examples abound.  It seems this fact is pretty central to the usage and predominance of the -izzle suffix in mainstream media outlets.  Can we maybe make this a bigger part of the page, find sources for it, and delete more of the stuff that is original research or just junk?  Cazort (talk) 23:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  -izzle to avoid censorship?
Wikipedia talk:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle

message: I decided to add an addition to a page that barely gets any editor traffic (and by that, I mean the last revision was back in November 2021). How long does it take for a bold edit to become the new consensus if it does not get reverted? 172.112.210.32 (talk) 14:06, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no rule.  Also, it doesn't matter.  Wikipedia:Consensus can change, so even if we were to say something silly, like "Your edit will achieve status as The Official Consensus Version™ unless it is reverted before 3:41 a.m. on the first Tuesday in June", someone could show up the next day and change the article.  Consensus is about what editors agree to right now.  The second they stop agreeing to something, there is no consensus any longer. WhatamIdoing (talk) 16:57, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

text: See also Wikipedia:Silence and consensus. - Butwhatdoiknow (talk) 17:01, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question
Talk:Transdnieper

message: Hmm, I am pretty sure Zadnieprze in Polish refers to Left-bank Ukraine, as from the Polish perspective "beyond the Dniepr" is obviously "east of the Dniepr".  Balcer 15:09, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, and this is what Polish wikipedia says as well. Wpatena (talk) 02:19, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
Talk:Kirkkonummi

message: Isn't the style a bit to much promotional, especially the last paragraph? I'm not exactly sure about the style in which this kind of articles should be written. - Wikirouta 15:09, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 
Talk:1994 Formula One World Championship

message: most of the info in the Drivers and constructors table is a copy of 1995. I've corrected Williams, but a lot of it needs changing. Spute 15:21, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Drivers and constructors tables

message: Huge chunks of this article carry no references or sourcing at all. Suggest a rewrite using decent sources. Bretonbanquet (talk) 22:52, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree, I tried to clean up a little bit of wrong info, but there's still a lot of stuff that needs work. For instance, the technical section refers to a lot of rule changes that were never implemented. The bit about Lamy's injuries seems dubious too. Frankly there are a lot of sources about F1 that are just plain wrong, so you have to be careful. LRT24 (talk) 00:43, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: Why is there a difference between the way Schumacher's exclusion is marked in the table and Eddie Irvine's?
Both were given bans and both were replaced for those races.
Same for Hakkinen in Hungary.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.255.38.126 (talk • contribs) 20:55, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. None of those drivers was excluded, but banned. Bans should not be listed in the results tables. Bretonbanquet (talk) 21:41, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eddie Irvine not listed as Excluded  
Talk:Ghiyas ud din Balban

message: There seems to be conflicting reports on the year of his death. If there's a convincing argument for either 1286 or 1287, please fix it on the article. - Bobet 15:32, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The external link mentioned here is not working. Can somebody put the right link here ramit 07:56, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  External link not working 

message: Note:  Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 15:46, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Delhi Addition 

message: Bulban’s son (Bughra khan) and grandson (Qaiqubad)met when Bulban died. Bughra feared bulban so much, he never left Bengal iqta. There was some book which intricately mentions emotional meeting of Bughra and Qaiqubad and kaikaus.
Bulban was also obsessed with Turkish culture and claimed descent of Turkic mythic heroes to give authenticity to his assent to his rule. 203.194.104.135 (talk) 14:32, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mamluk’s some journal ?
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Reddi 2/Evidence

message: Fringe science is scientific inquiry in an established field that departs significantly from mainstream or orthodox theories. Fringe science can be  protoscience but holds to the norms of the scientific method. Psuedoskeptics call the vast majority of protoscience "psuedoscience". I do show great diligence in digging up references (obscure and common) as per Wikipedia:Cite sources, Wikipedia:Verifiability, Wikipedia:No original research. _This_ is in accordance with those policies. 
I do not understand what the problem some have (especially the psuedoskeptics) with including information from researchers or people conducted worked in a scientific field or from Nikola Tesla, Albert Einstein, James Maxwell, or people that have studied thier work. A complete subjective judgement on including information and facts does not accord with the rule of editing an article without bias describing debates fairly instead of advocating any side of the debate. A good way to help building a neutral point of view is to find a reputable source for the piece of information you want to add to wikipedia, and _then_ cite that source. As in Ark of the Covenant (and many other articles), a verifiable and respectable source *should* be included (name calling "psuedo-scientists" and the "Teslaphiles" is not a conducive in this process). Just because something is verifiably said by someone (especially if they are respected in thier community), _does mean_ it can be added in wiki. Just because something is not an accepted scientific fact, as determined by the prevailing scientific consensus, does not mean that it should not be reported and referenced in Wikipedia. 
I will 'deny' discussing request on edits with other editors primarily if the make personal attacks upon me (and other violations of the Writers' rules of engagement). I do discuss it with other editors that are not "apologists", "Pseudoskeptics", or "Trolls".
As to making "edits made without comment" ... yes ... not every edit I make is commented. But if that is one of the worst things, I see nothing that I can do about my faulty memory or lack of something to comment on. Provide an edit summary is one of Wikipedia's "guideline" ... but not a pillar. I try not to revert the same page _more_ than *three times* on the same day, but there is nothing "heavy" about that ... and this is clearly within the acceptable policies of Wikipedia.  If there is a more than a triplaicate reversion the same page on the same day, I usually am blocked for 24 hr ... but this is not a usual case. 
Sincerely, JDR 15:49, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Evidence statement presented by {[[User:Reddi]]}
Talk:Glanmire

message: Someone should really add something in about the schools in Glanmire. I don't trust my own abilities, so I'm just going to complain and make someone else do it. Tautology 16:02, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Two very different concepts. I doubt the town name means both, so which is it? I'll be seeking out a reference to clarify, but if anyone else has insight? Kafka Liz (talk) 09:31, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ploughed land vs Small fish
Talk:Anuket

message: Moved from article page (Gareth Hughes 15:59, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved

message: I'm sure there's a source somewhere for Ani's interest in the Nile. That said, the fairly well-sourced treatment at the EB9 clearly describes her as the Elephantine goddess in charge of the entire terrestrial world and considered equivalent to Hestia in the i.g. So it does need sourcing. — LlywelynII 22:32, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Purview
Category talk:Research vessels of the United States

message: This category should contain all vessels listed at Research_vessel#United_States_of_America.  I've been working on updating that list, although it is still quite incomplete.
Kjordahl 15:19, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Both should contain all ships listed by UNOLS. Kjordahl 15:32, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing entries
Talk:Central government

message: Central Government 160.238.75.237 (talk) 00:15, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Central Government 

message: Which bodies together from central government 2409:4043:4D9A:F23E:0:0:1A8B:1F06 (talk) 08:19, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  S.s.t
Talk:Brogan

message: I think this article is divine truth.
This page probably should be disambiguated... 76.90.138.2 (talk) 23:34, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

message: Google searches for "Brogan McMorrow" Wakakeri, "Brogan McMorrow" "Schooled", "Brogan McMorrow" "The .A. Protector", "Brogan McMorrow" "I'm In The Band", "Brogan McMorrow" "Jonas Brothers", and pretty much all the rest only show this Wikipedia page - absolutely zero results from independent reliable sources, so I've flagged this (again) as a hoax. MikeWazowski (talk) 14:32, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  On the hoax tag...
Talk:AM

message: No one is going to link to am as a word expecting to go to a page defining the word, so I removed these entries:
:;As a word
:*am is the English present-tense, first-person singular form of the verb "to be", the copula of the English language.
:*am is a contraction in German for the preposition and definite article "an dem".  It is used in place names, similar to the English "upon", as in "Frankfurt am Main".
Tedernst | Talk 16:33, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: what about people typing "am" in the browser bar expecting to find exactly some explanation of the often used "am" in german city names? Tobias Conradi (Talk) 17:06, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps there should be an article called Am in German city names.  If not, then the entry doesn't belong on this page. Tedernst | talk 20:17, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

text: I think there should be a quick mention of the verb "am" on this page... I mean, this is a page listing all the uses of "Am", and it is a word, so why not? They have it on the pages for "are" and "is". 71.247.198.94 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 19:08, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :I cannot find nowhere in WP that Airmail is abreviated AM/am/a.m. Tobias Conradi (Talk) 17:41, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It's common usage, see http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=am for example. wangi 17:46, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: Let's check this page's current status vs. the MoS:DP:
* Leading line(s): Check. Nothing in MoS:DP on grouping, oddly --didn't there use to be?
* Individual entries - bullets: Check.
* Individual entries - link with the first word: Check.
* Individual entries - no bolding or italics (with exceptions): Check.
* Individual entries - Redlinks: Check.
* Individual entries - at most one other wikilink: Check.
* Individual entries - sentence fragments: Check.
* Piping: Check.
* Order of entries - most-used first, clarifiers, embedded, synonyms, larger articles: Sort of check.
The "Order of entries" seems to be the toughest one to get consensus on, with the breakdown by groupings (lexical, in this case) coming second. Because this is a two-letter initialism, the entries are perforce disparate, and frequency of meaning is, as usual, very hard to establish or agree upon. Arguably, AM stands most often for "ante meridiem", in common usage. The remaining cases seem mostly to be unapplicable.
Urhixidur 01:08, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Review current status

message: Some old edits that used to be at the title "AM" are now at Talk:AM/Old edits. Graham87 05:25, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some relevant page history
Talk:David Levy (Israeli politician)

message: Somebody worked hard to write this incredibly long article, about twice as long as that about Moshe Dayan, arguably much more important figure in the history of Israel and the region. Very few people will be interested in his movements between ministries and his political maneouveres. The article should give concise account of his career, explain pecularities of this colorful figure, plus give a few jokes. 
As it stands, the article needs to be edited for grammar, style and factual inconsistencies.--BorisG 16:55, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know... Levy is still one of the most well known Sephardic (Israeli) politicians, and, as such,  he may spark more interest in the general public than he would otherwise (that is, if he were Ashkenazi).  As such, I would wait to see if more people agree with you before you cut the article down.  And as for Moshe Dayan, well... we have all the time in the world to work on his article.  --(Mingus ah um 03:00, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it is wonderful that we have such a detailed article on this important Israeli politician in the 1980s and 1990s. gidonb 05:58, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Wonderful though it may be, this article could use some additional sources. At the time of writing there are only two sourced statements in the entire article. Robofish (talk) 14:37, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The infobox photo was taken 1 December 1969. The Hebrew article infobox has a 2017 photohttps://he.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D7%93%D7%95%D7%93_%D7%9C%D7%95%D7%99. Perhaps this article's infobox should use the same or another more recent photo. Mcljlm (talk) 21:15, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox photo
Talk:John Fitch (inventor)

message: Didn't Fitch use a screw prop? He's credited with inventing an unsuccessful 1 c1804.  Trekphiler 16:58 & Trekphiler 21:36, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The entry "Collect Pond" in Wikipedia includes an image of Fitch testing his boat on Collect Pond.S. Valkemirer (talk) 13:40, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cross-refer to "Collect Pond" because of its relevant image
Talk:Deformed workers' state

message: Important to make the connection that the modern-day currents that were in the FI in the 48-63 period [USFI, ICFI, CWI, iSt...] use the DWS form while those who were not [SWP, LO, WP/ISL...] do not. That's the best predictor of whether a Trotskyist group is still DWS... --DuncanBCS 17:01, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

message: Articles for discussion:
*Degenerated workers' state
*Deformed workers' state
QFlux (talk) 18:48, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  See the other merge candidate. 72.228.177.92 (talk) 07:20, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Discussion 
Talk:Mohamadou Idrissou

message: To be encyclopedic-like, this article shouldn't mention blantantly that the player is 'as of 2005 a player of Hannover 96'. It should be implied in a progressive career overview or in a personnal biography stating where he comes from and where he ends up as a player. Lincher 17:03, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Style
Talk:List of sexual slang terms

message: Okay, so after the "List of Sexual Slang" page gets not only vandalized but locked up (WHO locked it and why?), I tried to get around this by making a new copy of the article at "List of Sexual Slang terms", and "Uncle G" comes along and deletes it. And now that article is locked up too! All of this for an article that was overwhelmingly voted "Keep" in its AfD. Will someone please tell me what the heck is going on here?? wikipediatrix 17:03, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

message: Please replace the page content with:

In relation to Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 August 31#List of sexual slang. Thanks, 59.149.124.29 (talk) 09:43, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Done ~  Amory (u • t • c) 10:42, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request 09:43, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
Talk:Karaikudi

message: Recently the following text was added:
:[This school 'looks' good. But in reality it's worst solely due to the principal Swaminathan. He is a tirant. Due to his ill-treatment of students, atleast 1 boy or girl commits suicide every year!]
I have deleted this statement pending citation. Wikipedia articles should only include facts that can be verified. See Wikipedia:Verifiability.
----
The section on the Alagappa college and the Central electrochemical research institute is unnecessarily long. Am planning to remove a major part of it unless someone objects with a valid reason. --Madhu 18:51, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --Madhu 13:39, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsupported statement
Talk:Data salvaging

message: There seems to be some IT industry confusion as to the different specific definitions of "recovery”, "salvaging" or “rescuing” of data. Corporations such as IBM, SUN, HP, Sungard, Ironmoutain and others define it as the process of "accessing and retrieving data from network storage devices" while smaller organizations and companies like Ontrack and DriveSavers who specialize in the niche market of rescuing data from failed storage devices also have coined such services as "Data Recovery". Therefore we see a need to keep both articles active. - --WikEditor 17:10, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

message: I turned this into a redirect because it's essentially an older version of that page. WikEditor cloned data recovery here with the justification that some companies use "data salvaging" to mean "data recovery," and their definition of "data recovery" is what most people would call "data mining." In any event, this page contains no real information outside of what's in the newer data recovery page. --FreelanceWizard 05:40, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reason for changing into a redirect to [[data recovery]]
Template talk:International numbering standards

message: What does the CAE stand for? At the moment is uselessly points to a disambiguation page.--Commander Keane 17:16, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: CAE

message: moved here from my talk Tobias Conradi (Talk) 20:10, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template 'Audiovisual works' contains red links
Talk:Nixon (disambiguation)

message: I think that 95% of the people who come here are looking for Richard "Tricky Dick" Nixon, our favorite impeached president.  Shouldn't he be at the top of the list?  Or at least bolded somehow?
:I think that Nixon should redirect to the Dickster, and this page should be at Nixon (disambiguation). — goethean ॐ 20:29, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. oTHErONE (Contribs) 02:26, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ordering
Talk:Lewis

message: Shouldn't at least famous people with lewis as a surname be added to this disambiguation page, e.g. C.S. Lewis, as I personally came to this page looking for Lewis. David Mulder - GreatSlovakia (talk) 17:27, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Last names

message: Was it really necessary to redirect to the disambig pages for when there are several people with the same name, since the information was already right there for the reader? Chris 17:25, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: What is the point of having all that information maintained on two separate pages?  If someone fixes or adds a George Lewis, they would have to go to two places to do it.  If you want them all on one page, have the George Lewis, John Lewis, etc. disambig pages redirect here - but don't have them in two places.  wknight94 17:50, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

text: Sounds good to me.  Make it so!  :)  You might want to look at the zillion or so other full name disambig pages and do the same - William Smith, George Brown, Fred Jones (disambiguation), etc., etc. wknight94 18:00, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

text: BTW, :Category:Human name disambiguation would be a place to start but i'm sure far less than half are represented there.  wknight94 18:02, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Necessary?

message: I am putting a proposal in the talk page of Lewis that Lewis be moved to "Isle of Lewis" and the disambig page moved to Lewis (or just no article at "Lewis"). This is because of an endless stream of people vandalising the "isle of lewis" article with messages for friends called "Lewis". If you are interested, please comment on the Lewis talk page.MRM 11:36, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There should certainly be an article at "Lewis", either the island, the surname, or the dab page. -- JHunterJ (talk) 13:07, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lewis main page - relocation proposal 
Talk:Blowgun

message: I redirect the duplicate article Blow-gun here.  There might be some salvagable info for a merge if anyone is interested.  --W.marsh 17:34, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Blow-gun
Talk:Cronopio (literature)

message: This short definition is obviously just a start. Please feel welcome to pitch in.
Shouldn't it be renamed Historias de Cronopios y de Famas? What else would the latter talked about? 
User:Ejrrjs  says What? 22:30, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Problem is that Cronopios apear in other books as well. Never the less, we could have an article about the book, with the description of the Cronopios, Famas and Esperanzas, and create redirects to  [Historias de Cronopios y de Famas#Cronopios], Famas and Esperanzas. Mariano(t/c) 09:05, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]