Talk:National security council

message: I reorganized the article to reflect it's more category-like status. I hope that it will be expanded upon as a directory of sorts for NSCs in various countries. As for the supposed controversy in China, we definitely need some more background with verifiable information. Thanks. Alcarillo 18:18, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent cleanup

message: This article seems a bit odd. The different states' NSCs do surely deserve their respective articles. But I don't see the point of this article. How about converting it into a disamb. page? Bertilvidet 19:19, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm beginning to agree with you. Let country-specific information be covered in articles specifically related to that country's NSC. But I feel it may be important to at least have some sort of intro like what's there now. Then it could follow with a country-by-country list... Alcarillo 19:55, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Bertilvidet I see that you removed the cleanup tag. I concur. Alcarillo 14:33, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

text: I now see that this article is part of a larger editing war that I'm not going to get dragged into. Anyway... So I reorganized the article to make it even more neutral and (hopefully) encyclopedic. I generalized content about institutions with similar names, simplified the overall content, and repurposed the text concerning a possible NSC for China (still not verified, BTW) to Central Military Commission.   Alcarillo 18:01, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe the article is better now, short and consice with link to relevant country articles. Maybe the middle section, about the US NSC should go?? Let's discuss the single country articles at their respective talk pages. Thanks. Bertilvidet 14:47, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. I'll remove it. Alcarillo 15:05, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

text: Why would you include it in the NSC Turkey page when it pertains to the United States? Even so, that's a discussion for that particular article, not this one. Whatever discussion you're engaged in seems to be Turkey-specific, so I respectfully ask that you take it up with contributor(s) for those relevant articles, not for this one. I also suggest you set up a username with Wikipedia and become a trusted contributor yourself. Alcarillo 14:22, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Purpose of article? 

message: I dont mean to be insensitive and stubborn here and it is taking too long to explain the same thing but please see my note in the articles in the log history which goes (As you can see my edit history, I am trying to re-establish some good contributions at some very polarized articles and this si the same posting inviting a more open approach. Not so sure what is happening here with seemingly good suggestions being deleted back and forth. I find these changes useful and I believe they should be available to users. I guess that would be the fair thing to do. I think if the mentioned individuals believe that the log history given is inaccurrate, they should rather clarify it here rather than reversing everything. At least, I agree with the suggestions in the main block of the text as worthwhile and they are now my contributions. Hope to see some consensus here.) Perhaps, and quite rightfully, the sentences where any personal attack is percieved can be cleaned out rather than wholesale deletes. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 160.79.139.10 (talk) 16:53, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Ancient unsigned comments

message: Not so sure what is happening here with seemingly good suggestions being deleted back and forth. I find these changes useful and I believe they should be available to users. I guess that would be the fair thing to do. I think if the mentioned individuals believe that the log history given is inaccurrate, they should rather clarify it here rather than reversing everything. At least, I agree with the suggestions in the main block of the text as worthwhile and they are now my contributions. Hope to see some consensus here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 160.79.139.10 (talk) 16:53, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Endorsement by an independent contributor

message: The below legitimate edits to the National Security Council (Turkey) page by various authors have been vandalized and reverted with no discussion or agreement by the following acts by the users: 07:06, 16 August 2006 Bertilvidet,  17:34, 19 August 2006 Bertilvidet , 22:19, 20 August 2006 Khoikhoi
The National Security Council (Milli Güvenlik Kurulu (MGK) in Turkish) is a powerful body that unites the top civilian and military leaders, and issues state recommendations with the democratic government upon all matters deemed pertinent to the policies of the Turkish Republic. The creation of the MGK was an outcome of the reformation of The National Defense Supreme Council that had been in service since 1949 which was originally formed as The Supreme Defense Assembly in 1933 and was formally re-established in December 1962 under the organizational structure and name of The National Security Council in accordance with the 1961 Constitution. The National Security Council, composed of the Prime Minister, Chief of the General Staff, Deputy Prime Minister, Ministers of National Defence, Internal Affairs, Foreign Affairs, Finance, Transportation and Labor as well as Chief of Staff and Commanders of the Army, Navy, Air Forces and Gendarmarie under the chairmanship of the President of the Republic, assists the cabinet of Council of Ministers in decision making process related to national security issues and providing necessary coordination. The Council takes its decisions with majority vote. Decisions for recommendations made by voting have no binding power. In the absence of the President, the council would meet under the chairmanship of the Prime Minister. Depending on the agenda, Ministers and experts from various institutions would attend to the meetings of the Council upon Prime Minister’s invitation. Duties of the National Security Council were listed in the law under main headings on the issues of the advisory decisions pertaining to the formulation, establishment and implementation of the national security policy and ensuring the necessary coordination  in order to preserve the existence and independence of the State, the integrity and indivisibility of the country and the peace and the security of society.
Duties of MGK  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 160.79.139.10 (talk) 16:53, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Readers Cautioned

message: The most immediate attention required appears to be at the NSC Turkey site; if people feel that this NSC disambiguation page requires attention, please feel free to re-add the tag, but say what and which part needs attention
Buckshot06 06:01, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removing Immediate Attention Tag

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved as proposed. A substantial number of editors feel that this article should be made into a disambiguation page; feel free to do that boldly or, if necessary, to continue discussing the matter. (closed by non-admin page mover)  Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:28, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: National Security Council →  – Since this is an article about similar organizations in several dozen different countries, the article name is not a proper noun, and thus ought not be capitalized. For instance, we have the article "Board of directors" with a lower-case "d". Let's discuss as needed, and thanks to all for their contributions to WP. KConWiki (talk) 02:15, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 13 December 2021