Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Slipknot

message: I think that this wikiproject has created enough good (and featured) articles to form a potential Slipknot good topic. The one I feel that may most likely succeed in becoming a good topic would be Slipknot's discography. Here is a proposal for the possible good topic; the topic will include all four studio albums the band has released as well as live and video albums. —Terrence and Phillip 13:38, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Have a look at this. Gary King (talk) 15:24, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  They may argue it's not comprehensive if we do not include Slipknot Demo though... which sucks because we will never be able to get that up to GA status due to lack of sources. REZTER TALK ø 16:15, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow, I guess I came way too late in bring this up. Also if someone got the first demo into GA, how come there's not enough  refs for the second demo? —Terrence and Phillip 19:34, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I dunno... it wasn't as big of a thing.... I think it was more for just record labels instead of public release. There just isn't that many publications on the second demo, or the first DVD (which is also not a GA). REZTER TALK ø 23:17, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Update: See this. —Terrence and Phillip 04:48, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible Good Topic? 

message: Just to let all you guys know... I have uploaded nearly every free image of Slipknot from Flickr to WikiCommons. I also uploaded a set of photos from 2005 which I requested permission for. Just letting you guys know, in case you feel the need to use them. However, don't just use them for the sake of it. (images here) REZTER TALK ø 07:17, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 

message: The slipknot wikiproject has just finished trying to make its first good topic featuring about Slipknot discography and its related articles. Right now it has been nominated (for the 4th time actually) at WP:FTC. After the GT nomination passes (knock on wood), I think the wikiproject should either shift its focus from album articles to expanding band member articles or trying to get the main article Slipknot (band) to FA status. I personally favor expanding band member articles to GA/FA would be a better idea since it could form a potential second good topic. —Terrence and Phillip 09:41, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Whatever you guys want, I'll help out. I think bringing Slipknot (band) to FA will take less time, since there are nine band member articles that we'd have to work on, and all are at C-class status right now. It could be a great morale booster to have our main article at FA, too. If we work on band members, maybe we should split the nine up among us, so we each get our own article to work on? Gary King (talk) 16:59, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: As for individual band member articles, right now I'm working on the Joey Jordison article to get it to GA, hopefully after it finishes its current peer review. I also think getting the main slipknot band article to FA would be a fantastic idea, but it would unlikely be included in any good/featured topic. One major problem of getting all the band members' articles to GA would be the relative lack of information. Most band members rarely mention anything about their personal lives outside of Slipknot. —Terrence and Phillip 17:13, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The Jordison article should be pretty darn close to GA. The member out there with the most info on him besides Jordison would be Corey. Beyond that it will be a stretch to get some to GA, I doubt it will be possible for all of them. Getting singles to GA will be difficult, especially for the early ones, simply based on a lack of reliable info. Same goes for Behind The Player: Paul Gray. I want to help, but like Rezter I've been limited in the amount of time here because of work. blackngold29 23:46, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Just so you guys know... I'm in talks with a lot of photographers tryign to get their permission to issue photographs of Slipknot under a free license to use on Wikipedia. Like I said in the previous section I did get some from 2005, but there seems to be a little trouble with them ones because the permission wasn't explicit enough. But I did get some KILLER photos from earlier this year and there are a few other photographers who have already shown interest and they just need to give me their explicit permission with this kind of informal contract thing. As for what we should work on... How about these articles; Nic Diederichs Technical High School slashing, Rollerball (2002 film), Infected (video game). I know these articles are low on importance within the project, but I think we could turn these articles over quite quickly and get them to GA status without too much hassle. I am also mid-way through writing the article for Come What(ever) May and that is shaping up to be easily GA status if not FA, I'm pretty sure the side-projects and all that is lower on peoples importance lists but as the collaboration elements have unfortunately dwindle as of late, I have been working on the side-project articles on my own. REZTER TALK ø 01:41, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think I've found one task the wikiproject could work on. If we could pass this one through, it could be a major accomplishment for this wikiproject. I also tried looking for some info about Behind The Player: Paul Gray, but all they have is amazon.com, youtube trailers, online stores, and torrent sites. Nothing useful from this guy. —Terrence and Phillip 15:48, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: If anyone is interested, check this out. Additional input could be really helpful. —Terrence and Phillip 05:11, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

text: Damn I'm so gonna order one of those. After all the time I put in to Wikipedia and definitely Slipknot on wikipedia, it would be awesome to have a physical record of it. REZTER TALK ø 06:24, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Goals? 

message: I'd like to have people's opinions on this topic. It would be appreciated to get as many people involved in the discussion as possible. REZTER TALK ø 09:06, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tour article image consensus 

message: In an attempt to breath life back in to the Project I am arranging a Roll Call and will begin making arrangement for group initiatives throughout the coming months. Just so the Project can keep an updated list of people who continue to contribute to the Project a Roll Call will happen from time to time. It is understood that over time, users may have lost interest in the Project or Wikipedia all together; if you have, it's no big deal. If you would like to keep contributing to the project please sign the list. If you do not add your name to the list by January 16, you will become an "Inactive member", this will bar you from voting in the AoF, as well as receiving the monthly newsletter. Remember, if you ever want to join the project again, you are always welcome!!!
;List (I wish to continue contributing)
* REZTER TALK ø 01:29, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roll Call - January 2010 

message: I would like to get a project consensus on this. Are Unauthorized releases notable enough for Wikipedia? For example Behind the Mask (Slipknot film) and Up to our Necks, I know they're real DVDs and everything but a quick glance at WP:NF would make them appear non-notable. I had a similar problem with the stuff on Music made in tribute of Slipknot and my conclusion was to put them in to a combined article. Do you think this is a good idea with these? If so, would the article be (for example) Unauthorized films about Slipknot? Because then one might also argue that Unauthorized CDs such as these:      would deserve a place on Wikipedia and I'm sure that would then bring all kinds of connotations including a multitude of bootleg albums and we all know that will bring Crowz in to it. Then that would bring about copyright issues and verification. There's also books including    , I have all these books but once again per WP:NB they don't seem notable. The point I'm trying to make is we need to reach a consensus on whether we make similar articles to Music made in tribute of Slipknot for unauthorized stuff or rule it out on notability and verification grounds. Does making a combination article make any difference on notability or should we hard line with the guidelines? Add comments below and add your name to one of the lists below. REZTER TALK ø 17:02, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Unauthorized" consensus 

message: I believe we should remove all unauthorized material according to Wikipedia guidelines.
#REZTER TALK ø 17:02, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Vote

message: Like many of you know, I've submitted List of Slipknot concert tours to be a FL Candidate. If anyone, especially the participants of the Slipknot Project, could help with stuff the people say. You can see all thier comments here. Thanks, CrowzRSA 02:16, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[List of Slipknot concert tours]] 

message: This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 03:55, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP 1.0 bot announcement 

message: Hello Wikiproject! Currently there is a discussion which will decide whether wikipedia will delete 49,000 articles about a living person without references, here:
Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Biographies of living people
Since biographies of living people covers so many topics, many wikiproject topics will be effected.
The two opposing positions which have the most support is:  
# supports the deletion of unreferenced articles about a living person, User:Jehochman
# opposes the deletion of unreferenced articles about a living person, except in limited circumstances, User:Collect
Comments are welcome.  Keep in mind that by default, editor's comments are hidden. Simply press edit next to the section to add your comment. 
Please keep in mind that at this point, it seems that editors support deleting unreferenced BLP articles if they are not sourced, so your project may want to source these articles as soon as possible. See the next, message, which may help. 
===Tools to help your project with unreferenced Biographies of living people===
;List of cleanup articles for your project
If you don't already have this and are interested in creating a list of articles which need cleanup for your wikiproject see:  Cleanup listings A list of examples is here
;Moving unreferenced blp articles to a special "incubation pages" 
If you are interested in moving unreferenced blp articles that your project covers, to a special "incubation page",  contact me, User talk:Ikip
;Watchlisting all unreferenced articles
If you are interested in watchlisting all of the unreferenced articles once you install Cleanup_listings, contact me, User talk:Ikip
Ikip  05:28, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for comment on Biographies of living people

message: ;List of cleanup articles for your project
If you don't already have this and are interested in creating a list of articles which need cleanup for your wikiproject see:  Cleanup listings A list of examples is here
;Moving unreferenced blp articles to a special "incubation pages" 
If you are interested in moving unreferenced blp articles that your project covers, to a special "incubation page",  contact me, User talk:Ikip
;Watchlisting all unreferenced articles
If you are interested in watchlisting all of the unreferenced articles once you install Cleanup_listings, contact me, User talk:Ikip
Ikip  05:28, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Tools to help your project with unreferenced Biographies of living people

message: The main Slipknot page goes beyond the requirments for GA and I think it meets the A-Class criteria. Appearanlty, it requires more copyediting to become FA but the page surly should be A-Class. I notice their are their are only two other bands in the Category A-Class biography (musicians) articles but why shouldn't Slipknot be included? CrowzRSA 03:30, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually I don't see how it's not FA now. CrowzRSA 22:42, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slipknot: A-Class? 

message: I have made an article of the DVD (sic)nesses. I was reluctant to make the article as I thought that it would be very small. I believe that we have enough information to start a stub and we can keep expanding it as more info gets released. Some clean up might be required. Torque3000Talk 16:23, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  (sic)nesses 

message: can someone please change paul out of the former members catagory and put him into a new catagory called deceased  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Quakemasterscarecrow (talk • contribs) 23:33, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It is not practice within Wikipedia to create a separate section for deceased band members, they are simply categorized as Former Members. See similar topics: Metallica and Queen (band). --REZTER TALK ø 23:42, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paul Gray 

message: Version 0.8 is a collection of Wikipedia articles selected by the Wikipedia 1.0 team for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone.  Articles were selected based on their assessed  importance and quality, then article versions (revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the WikiTrust algorithm.
We would like to ask you to review the Slipknot articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (♦) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8 with the details.  You may wish to look at your WikiProject's articles with cleanup tags and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Monday, October 11th.
We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of October, 2010.  As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as One Laptop per Child and Wikipedia for Schools to extend the reach of Wikipedia worldwide.  Please help us, with your WikiProject's feedback! 
For the Wikipedia 1.0 editorial team, SelectionBot 23:37, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slipknot articles have been selected for the Wikipedia 0.8 release 

message: If Donnie Steel continues on with the band as a full time member, will he qualify for a article sometime in the future?Jasper420 21:16, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "No articles for former members" 

message: With the fifth album just weeks away and loads of information is being released concerning the album, singles, tours etc. I would like as many people as possible to join in to help get some more of Slipknot's articles in the Good Article section and even help push the main page as a featured article. Just so the Project can keep an updated list of people who continue to contribute to the Project a Roll Call will happen from time to time. It is understood that over time, users may have lost interest in the Project or Wikipedia all together; if you have, it's no big deal. If you would like to keep contributing to the project please sign the list. If you do not add your name to the list by September 25, you will become an "Inactive member", this will bar you from voting in the AoF. Remember, if you ever want to join the project again, you are always welcome!!!
;List (I wish to continue contributing)
*Kevon100  Talk! Mail  20:15, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roll Call August 2014 

message: An editor has expanded Donnie Steele from a redirect into a full article. I noticed that there's a notice on the talk page saying WikiProject Slipknot had decided it should remain a redirect; has the situation changed since that note was made? — Paul A (talk) 05:51, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Donnie Steele 

message: Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:48, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment on the WikiProject X proposal 

message: Please see Talk:Wednesday_13#Why_only_one_article.3F. — Cirt (talk) 17:51, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revisit merge for Wednesday (band) 

message: Hello everyone!
You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!
Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.
Harej (talk) 16:57, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject X is live! 

message: The reason I am contacting you is because there are one or more portals that fall under this subject, and the Portals WikiProject is currently undertaking a major drive to automate portals that may affect them.
Portals are being redesigned.
The new design features are being applied to existing portals.
At present, we are gearing up for a maintenance pass of portals in which the introduction section will be upgraded to no longer need a subpage. In place of static copied and pasted excerpts will be self-updating excerpts displayed through selective transclusion, using the template .
The discussion about this can be found here.
Maintainers of specific portals are encouraged to sign up as project members here, noting the portals they maintain, so that those portals are skipped by the maintenance pass.  Currently, we are interested in upgrading neglected and abandoned portals. There will be opportunity for maintained portals to opt-in later, or the portal maintainers can handle upgrading (the portals they maintain) personally at any time.
=== Background ===
On April 8th, 2018, an RfC ("Request for comment") proposal was made to eliminate all portals and the portal namespace.  On April 17th, the Portals WikiProject was rebooted to handle the revitalization of the portal system. On May 12th, the RfC was closed with the result to keep portals, by a margin of about 2 to 1 in favor of keeping portals.
There's an article in the current edition of the Signpost interviewing project members about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.
Since the reboot, the Portals WikiProject has been busy building tools and components to upgrade portals.
So far, 84 editors have joined.
If you would like to keep abreast of what is happening with portals, see the newsletter archive.
If you have any questions about what is happening with portals or the Portals WikiProject, please post them on the WikiProject's talk page.
Thank you.     — The Transhumanist    07:55, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject collaboration notice from the [[WP:WPPORT|Portals WikiProject]] 

message: On April 8th, 2018, an RfC ("Request for comment") proposal was made to eliminate all portals and the portal namespace.  On April 17th, the Portals WikiProject was rebooted to handle the revitalization of the portal system. On May 12th, the RfC was closed with the result to keep portals, by a margin of about 2 to 1 in favor of keeping portals.
There's an article in the current edition of the Signpost interviewing project members about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.
Since the reboot, the Portals WikiProject has been busy building tools and components to upgrade portals.
So far, 84 editors have joined.
If you would like to keep abreast of what is happening with portals, see the newsletter archive.
If you have any questions about what is happening with portals or the Portals WikiProject, please post them on the WikiProject's talk page.
Thank you.     — The Transhumanist    07:55, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Background 

message: Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for information on WP1.0 web tool