lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Julie Fernandez

message: If you ask me this article seems a little promotional:
"working on exciting new programme ideas" why exciting? surely just "working on new programme ideas".
Why are her views on san fransisco in any way informative?
Also surely it should read:
"Because she was born with Osteogenesis Imperfecta (brittle bone disease) Julie happens to be a wheelchair user." 
Rather than
"Julie was born with Osteogenesis Imperfecta (brittle bone disease) as she happens to be a wheelchair user. "Julie was born with Osteogenesis Imperfecta (brittle bone disease) as she happens to be a wheelchair user." That makes no sense - noone is born a wheel-chair user.
:No kidding. This was the opening paragraph two edits ago:
::Julie Fernandez (born April 20, 1974) is a very famous British actress, television presenter, model, comedian, writer, comedy writer, comedy actress, journalist, model, athlete, and television producer and extra, although she is best known as Brenda, her award-winning role on the BBC comedy The Office, in which she starred as Brenda. Famous comedian Ricky Gervais co-starred with Julie in the sitcom which he also wrote.
:Hilarious! Apart from being a writer and a comedy writer (etc. etc.), the very famous Fernandez "starred" in The Office, in which Ricky Gervais merely "co-starred". Looks like she's got some fans with no sense of proportion out there.  ProhibitOnions  (T) 10:37, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tone
Talk:Denver Public Library

message: * http://denverlibrary.org/files/org_chart1110.pdf
WhisperToMe (talk) 17:30, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Organization chart

message: In looking at the Spanish language article, es:Biblioteca_Pública_de_Denver, it appeared that this would be an easy informational input to a still meager article on a major Denver, Colorado institution.
Should the Bookmobile be added under Denver_Public_Library#Library_Branches.5B3.5D either as a subheading under the Central Library or as its own branch since, effectively, it is a mobile library branch under the supervision of the Central Library?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ensa (talk • contribs) 09:41, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Library Branches

message: This article is about the Denver's public libraries, but it uses a NRHP infobox.  Only one branch of the entire library system--the one located at 1357 Broadway--appears on the NRHP.  The infobox should be changed.  Magnolia677 (talk) 23:41, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox 
Talk:Burgos Cathedral

message: Does anyone know the actual date of the completion of construction. I've found conflicting information regarding when it was finished? The conflicts are as much as 2 centuries apart. --Colin Angus Mackay 00:12, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay - I've found the 1911 edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica states 1567 so I'm going with that as it is a reputable source. --Colin Angus Mackay 00:19, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Completion Date 

message: This is a building of "top" architectural importance, when compared with the ratings of others. Amandajm (talk) 14:12, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Importance
Talk:Tatsuya Nakadai

message: This filmography does not yet contain all of Nakadai's films. I replaced the old column template, which had to be adjusted for every new entry, with the new one, which is in use in numerous articles, which adjusts automatically with every new entry. It also works with multiple browsers. Many if not most IP's and named users do not pay attention to the need to adjust columns with the old template. In fact that is why the new one was developed. Unless proof can be provided that the new one does not work I can see no reason to revert to said old template. MarnetteD | Talk 03:15, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Column templates

message: Nakadai's portrayal of the non-Japanese Comanchero James Alfego is notable not just because he plays an "American", but he is clearly seen to be "speaking" English. Unfortunately, the film is entirely (and badly) dubbed... I suppose he spoke English well enough.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.215.115.31 (talk) 16:48, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Today We Kill, Tomorrow We Die
Talk:Bert McCracken

message: I've archived the past discussions, as most of them were off-topic to improving the article. Let's start 2009 with a clean slate! — The Hand That Feeds You:Bite 04:03, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean Slate

message: Don't you think the "Biography" section uses too the word "rebel" too many times? One sample sentence: "He rebeled against his parents and rebeled against their Mormon religion by going to other churches and rebeling."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thefishnamedcarl (talk • contribs) 00:06, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rebel rebel rebel 

message: Has anyone noticed the  'In Love And Death' album info is missing from the rest of them? I remember reading a few of the songs were about late girlfriend Kate (sometimes known as Katie)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.197.184.121 (talk) 15:06, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Album 
Talk:Eisenach

message: "Eisenach sights" has been merged with "Eisenach, Germany".
See following page history as transferred from "Eisenach sights":
(cur) (last)  23:39, 4 Jun 2005 Dieter Simon (Redirect "Eisenach, Germany")
(cur) (last)  00:47, 14 May 2005 Dieter Simon m (Have placed this article on the Wikipedia:Duplicate articles page as it should be merged with Eisenach, Germany)
(cur) (last)  09:00, 13 May 2005 Eisenach (→Rathaus)
(cur) (last)  08:56, 13 May 2005 84.184.57.132
Dieter Simon 00:44, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Female 175.141.101.28 (talk) 14:05, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eisenach
Talk:Japanese

message: Ah. What am I supposed to say here? Uh.......hmm. I was just wanting to know what type of writing system is mostly used in Japan. I don't know which ones I should learn first. Katakana, Hiragana, Kanji, Handakuon, Dakuon, Kana, or Rōmaji? Just, ah....just asking is all. 
I probably sound like a dork though, because I think Handakuon and Dakuon are pretty much the same. But I think Katakana and sometimes Kanji are used most constantly. I'm not positive though. So, uh......Gosh, no one is probably ever going to read this, and I'm probably never going to come back to see if there is a reply or not, so why bother? 
But you know, I'd never be able to make such a vast website such as yours, so congratulations! And keep up the good work! I enjoy the forign language parts of Wikipedia. Thank you for helping me out!
:Well, dakuten is not really a writing system, it's more like Japanese diacritics to voice a consonant sound. Kana is an umbrella term for both Katakana and Hiragana. Anyway, you should probably learn Hiragana first, and Katakana shortly afterwards (or possibly, the other way around, like me) and not start with Kanji before you begin knowing your Kana quite well. Anyway, there are already quite extensive Wikipedia articles about the Japanese writing systems.
::I might be late in this story but the most letters that are used are Hiragana and Kanji. You should first learn Hiragana first to get the hang of the rest, but romaji is easier. user:Englishfun
: Well, I'm totally late for this, but you should get a solid footing in hiragana before going anywhere. Then go to katakana, and then you can start kanji. Romaji is a great tool during this time, but don't get used to it, it can very quickly become a crutch. Hope I helped. :)ILuvEire (talk) 06:58, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Erm................... 

message: The Japanese wiki contains a lot of Kanjis. I'm trying to add the span class title thing for clarity, but does not work out very well, since it's not with the wikitext editor. What do we do? --2A01:E35:2F23:5EA0:25C2:1A8F:9A98:53D2 (talk) 08:08, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japanese wiki
Wikipedia talk:List of largest wikis

message: It would be interesting (useful) to have users' statistics as well as article's one. Vald 15:30, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of registered users 

message: How does "conservative" differ from "inclusive"? I understand that it does not include redirects (and stubs maybe?) but is there any other difference? It would be nice if this article explained it (or at least it should link to somewhere where it's explained). Alensha 17:16, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: One explanation is at Special:Statistics. --Pmsyyz 21:37, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  "conservative" vs "inclusive" 

message: These are mostly Wikimedia wikis, perhaps we should have a list that excludes Wikimedia wikis (not ones using the Wikimedia software though) as well. Silles Sellis 16:53, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-wikimedia wikis 

message: Whoever's bot updates these figures, I would like to suggest the inclusion of The TV IV Wiki (MediaWiki), currently at 13,000+ articles. --Naddy 11:42, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additions 

message: What is the green background supposed to represent? Do we need a legend? 211.26.141.2 09:44, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Projects other than Wikipedias, apparently. / tsca ✉ 07:57, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colored cell backgrounds? 

message: It seems that a Chinese Wikipedian transfered the table to m:List of largest wikis, which Chinese Wikipedia seems to link to it. I think moving it to Meta is good for the sake of no original research among others, but before asking the consesus, I reverted the table back. --Puzzlet Chung 07:00, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, if the list isn't in this article, why should the article even exist? --Pmsyyz 21:37, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

text: Wikipedia's distinction shown on the table between a "conservative" and an "inclusive" number of pages originated in 2002 with the replacement of UseModWiki's spontaneous wiki modes with MediaWiki's embedded namespaces.
What the hell does that mean? That's a really confusing first sentence to read upon coming to an article. First of all, there's no table in this article. Second of all, where is the introductory sentence? Some kind of overview or something? --Torgo 05:05, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to Meta?
Talk:Bagheera

message: There are many indications pointing to the fact that, Bagheera as a character is very similar to Najib ad-Dawlah. Fjgdh5 (talk) 21:44, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Historical oversight

message: Bagheera is also the name of Kate's pet lion in John Brunner's The Shockwave Rider
In Hindi, leopard is "bagh", so Bagheera is supposedly female from the beginning.
That 'Other Uses' section at the bottom should be a disambiguation page... --65.13.33.65 20:17, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bagheera

message: Mentioned in Media potrayals: "In some Disney comics drawn in Italy, Bagheera is depicted as a female non-anthropomorphic animal movie star, loosely based on her animated movie appearance. Originally all black, she has white body parts. She enjoys signing autographs to her fans and eating pistachio-flavored pet food, being vegetarian."
It is true that Italian writers and artists made Bagheera a female in these italian stories? I'm trying to find these stories on INDUCKS and I found nothing about this female version of Bagheera. --Nectaria 12:53, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Female Bagheera in some Italian Disney comics? 

message: Bagheera's name was also given to a species of jumping spider from the Americas, one of which is herbivorous.184.186.4.209 (talk) 03:31, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Bagheera Spider
Talk:Unaccompanied Suites for Violoncello (Bach)

message: Yes, yes, I know. I've written  one  two sentences for this stub. I'm just tired right now- I'll expand it tomorrow. If anyone else wants to do it, here's a link: http://previewct.com/gbase/Music/content.html?oid=oid:60570. Otherwise, I'll be back tomorrow. Promise. (Yawn). Flcelloguy 02:51, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops. Didn't know it existed already- sorry! I've now merged the two articles and made this a redirect. Flcelloguy 02:00, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Category talk:Flag images

message: I will be going through this category, placing various images on WP:IFD for various reasons. If you have any questions, just let me know. Zscout370 (Sound Off) 02:53, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I also will be placing some images at the Wikimedia Commons and might redraw a few. Zscout370 (Sound Off) 22:38, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)

message: Due to the discussion at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flags/message/97681, all images from FOTW are going to be speedy deleted, since FOTW images are only to be used for non-commercial purposes. Zach (Sound Off) 21:46, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  FOTW Images 

message: These articles need flags:
*Hungary at the 1972 Summer Olympics
*Afghanistan at the 1988 Summer Olympics
--elias.hc 09:51, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some flags are gone
Category talk:Provinces of New Zealand

message: There having been all of ten NZ provinces in the strict sense, and all abolished 130 years ago, I doubt if we really want to make a category for them. Maybe the promoter of the idea can write a generously inclusive description, so that we can include "provincial" football teams, for example. Robin Patterson 02:54, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of Canadian plays

message: Support - Article is over 100 kB, and should be split (if not deleted).  Thoughts???--Jax 0677 (talk) 20:55, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose with a suggested alternative - I've never seen a Wikipedia article wrap around the footnote counter.   Perhaps we could find some references that talk about many plays at once, instead of citing the manuscript for each play. I don't know how you would rationally divide this article. Maybe it would be useful to tighten up the list criteria to "Plays that have had at least two cited public performances by a professional company for a paying audience".  An easier criterion would be "either the play or the author has an article" - we could apply that mechanically without a lot of research. --Wtshymanski (talk) 15:01, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I must admit the vast number of Red Links makes me think the delete option is the better option. If the article is to be split, then please do it properly i.e. 1 article per first letter with a template for navigating etc. The way this split has started is not a long term solution. Op47 (talk) 23:41, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Size split?
Talk:The Nights Dawn Trilogy

message: I know nothing about this book series but stumbled upon the page and noticed it needed some cleaning up. Anyone knowledgeable enough? AquaDoctorBob 04:08, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)

message: This article survived a Vote for Deletion. Its content was merged and redirected to the current target. The discussion can be found here. -Splash 20:26, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Vote for Deletion
Talk:Take Five

message: Ultimately, in my opinion, the article will have a section (augmenting and maybe replacing 'Musical Style') that ties together: Brubeck's inspiration (Eurasia), Morello's instigation (his 5/4 ability), Desmond's mandated creativity [being delegated by Brubeck to compose (main/bridge) melodies in 5/4 time], and the tortuous recording process (recounted superbly in Stephen Crist's 2019 book 'Dave Brubeck's Time Out', pp. 117-123). Birdman euston (talk) 12:24, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: To this end, I've now added a 'Composing and recording' section - surely this article is now more than Start-Class on the 'quality scale'? ;) Birdman euston (talk) 14:43, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  Surprising that the article does not mention the recording engineer Fred Plaut (born in Munich/Germany 1907) https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Plaut Ontologix (talk) 11:00, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin/Recording 

message: Can anyone add a suitable contemporaneous photo of the Quartet together or Paul Desmond alone, e.g. in the recording studio, that doesn't destroy copyright? Any college students out there whose institution subscribes to a free-use images database? Some fantastic colour photos of the Time Out recording sessions exist but they're owned by the estate of the late Don Hunstein, Columbia Records staff photographer at that time, or by Sony Music. Birdman euston (talk) 17:51, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: To this end, I've now added 'Public Domain' photos of Paul Desmond and the Dave Brubeck Quartet, sourced from Wikimedia Commons. Birdman euston (talk) 20:08, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suitable photos 

message: Cherry Wainer made her own version of the song purely on the Hammond B-3 Organ with drums in the 1960s. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9h_N_VEI9nM
I feel this should be a section in the article, or as a note. Have other musicians modified the song to their own style that should be mentioned?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.193.254.87 (talk) 03:22, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Versions from other musicians 

message: Native to where? and who were they? Marnanel (talk) 20:46, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  native symphony musicians
Talk:Unification theology

message: Still needs Christology section . . . [00:11, 5 June 2005 User:Billlund]
The article needs to say something about the Unificationist literal, historical, fundamentalist interpretation of the Bible. [23 May 2006 User:24.22.111.11]
:You could say something like: "Unificationists have a literal, historical, fundamentalist interpretation of the Bible."  What you shouldn't do on Wikipedia is express an opinion about it like: "This makes them wonderful people of faith."  or:  "This makes them narrow-minded, old-fashioned bigots."  Steve Dufour 03:26, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Except that "literal" is only half correct, and "fundamentalist" is nearly 100% incorrect. -Exucmember 05:59, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm guessing that the person posting the comment favors a humanistic, modernistic interpretation of the Bible and is comparing the DP to that.  You are right that we are less literal than the average "fundamentalist" Christian.  Steve Dufour 05:29, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I think the article needs to be renamed "Unification Theology." I'm guessing whoever named it didn't have formal theological training. Also, this should be the main article for Unification Theology (not, for example, the Unification Church, which has a section for theology and a section for church teachings, and uses the two interchangably). It needs to be filled out a lot. At present it is very unbalanced in terms of which topics it addresses. -Exucmember 03:55, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good job on the merge. Thanks! --Uncle Ed 15:14, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Renaming of article

message: This article has exactly two citations (both to UC sources), so after tagging it for this fact in July, I have trimmed it down to only having the lead plus the two statements cited to them. If no improvement is made on sources/verifiable content, I will be putting this article up for merger shortly. Unification Thought, which likewise has only two, UC, citations, is in danger of going the same way. HrafnTalkStalk 05:28, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Not if sources can't be found, it shouldn't
Talk:W.A.S.P. (album)

message: Just picked up a promo of Winged Assassins, on the spine of the album it says W.A.S.P. - W.A.S.P.; Capital records (vinyl) ST-12343.24.68.45.25 (talk) 03:11, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wasp - Wasp on Canadian vinyl 
Talk:Yoko Ono/Plastic Ono Band

message: Surely the image of the cover here is that of the John album, not the Yoko one ~ for hers he is supposed to be leaning on her.  Does anyone have that picture? Cheers, Lindsay 09:55, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind, it's true, i'm an idiot! Lindsay 09:57, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cover

message: Surely a joke, Stalin being long dead by the time this album was issued. Doesn't make much sense for the wikipedia article to link to the article on the historical figure. I haven't heard the album, does it feature cowbell? Juryen (talk) 17:24, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it doesn't, and he's not listed in the CD credits. Just a joke so unfunny it's unrecognizable as such. Juryen (talk) 21:47, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Joseph Stalin, cowbell

message: In the US, "Why" was not edited, and was presented in it's full length on the 'B'-side of "Mother".  "Mother", however, was edited. Radiopathy •talk• 15:01, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Why" single 

message: I'm trying to move the quote box in which Yoko talks about Ornette Coleman. As-is, it's in the middle of an unrelated paragraph. I'm trying to move it to immediately follow the paragraph about recording with Coleman's band. It works in "edit," but when I save and go to the main article nothing has changed. PurpleChez (talk) 14:15, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I wonder if there is a conflict with the info-box in the upper right. PurpleChez (talk) 14:16, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit attempt
Talk:WBGU (FM)

message: All the information on this page about the history comes directly from the WBGU-FM training documents and thus is copywritten to the training director who made it and then updated this wiki, Andrew Balcerzak. It is not published, so citations are not available. The documentation is all in the station in electronic copy. Not sure how to show this? WBGU Member Dec 25 2007 (EST)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.62.26.230 (talk)  
The image is too large, but I can't get the resize coding to work (does this not work on GIFs?).  Also, I'm concerned about copyright.  Kelly Martin 04:55, Jun 5, 2005 (UTC)
:Agree, image (wiki link: Image:WBGU 88.1 FM Coverage Pattern.gif ) is copyrighted to radio-locator.com, and is not fair use (as logos would be, by Wikipedia guidelines).  I removed the image in favor of a new infobox incorporating WBGU-FM's logo.  (There isn't room at present for both anyway.) SwissCelt 21:21, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately the history section and 2nd paragraph have to go for now because of copyright issues.  Information on how the owner of that copyright can grant use to Wikipedia is avalanche here, or the section can be rewritten to avoid any copyright problems.--RadioFan
 (talk) 03:50, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Release of copyright has be set in motion. I feel like I tried to talk to RadioFan about this page, but started a near editing war, and I do not know why. Foodlovesme (talk) 23:21, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tom Neal

message: In many reference books and articles on Tom Neal he's listed as a graduate of Northwestern University and Harvard, some say the law school, in other cases it's just the university. I understand that people graduated from high school and college at younger ages back then, yet Neal, listed as having been born in 1914, seems awfully young for a fellow to have graduated college, obtained a graduate degree and to have started a movie career in 1938, with two releases that year, several more for 1939. Unless Neal was an extraordinarily good student he likely graduated college in 1935-36, law (or grad) school,--he must have been remarkably studious, took classes all year round--would likely have earned him his degree in 1937-38 or possibly later. The IMDB has Neal making his debut on Broadway in 1935, at the age of twenty-one, not out of the question and yet curious, as he's listed as having received his Harvard degree in 1938, the same year he started in movies. His rise as an actor strikes mas a remarkably quick, especially as he was a fairly limited performer. I'm curious if anyone has researched Neal's university education to see if he actually earned those degrees. It's possible, for sure, yet the years given make it seem unlikely to me. Also, Neal's tough guy persona, true to life, as later events bear out, don't suggest a man with a high level of education.
JB  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Telegonus (talk • contribs) 12:02, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  University Education 