lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Alessandro Stradella

message: 88.1.173.16 (talk) 19:48, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

message: Date of birth doesn't match Find-A-Grave. Lincher 03:17, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for pointing that out.  The most recent research, by Carolyn Gianturco (four publications in the 1990s) has April 3, 1639 as his birthdate; it was previously believed to be October 1, 1644.  I wrote the first draft of this article from the 1980 Grove which had the old; the new online Grove has the April 3, 1639 date.  Antandrus  (talk) 03:25, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

text: Thanks for fixing the category.  The correct date, according to current research, is 3 April 1639 (see Carolyn Gianturco's biography of the composer in the current New Grove).  Thanks, Antandrus  (talk) 15:36, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If the correct birthdate is April 3, 1639, why does the article still say that he was born July 3, 1643?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.206.187.183 (talk) 05:50, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article asserts that three operas were based on Stradella's life.  Anyone know who wrote the other two and what they were called (if in fact they exist)? --GuillaumeTell 15:43, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The two most famous would be the ones by Flotow and Louis Niedermeyer (Alessandro Stradella 1844 and Stradella 1837/1841, respectively).  Other composers who wrote operas based on his life include Franz Doppler, Adolph Schimon, Giuseppe Sinico, and Virgilio Marchi, but I haven't learned anything about the operas (could do some more digging ...).  Antandrus  (talk) 15:56, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks!  I'd forgotten about Niedermeyer and have just discovered Schimon in Operissimo, but didn't think of looking any further.  It looks as if the text could benefit from a suitable amendment - "at least six"?  Name them all?  This is of only peripheral interest to me, however (I've been augmenting Alessandro Stradella (opera), which is how I arrived here). --GuillaumeTell 17:34, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Three operas? 

message: What is the link with Stradella? He is not mentioned at Oratory of Santissimo Crocifisso. The de.wiki article mentions him as being "specially engaged" there for the Holy Week oratorios, but the source supporting this claim is unclear. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:40, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Oratory of Santissimo Crocifisso]] 

message: "His infidelities were well-known..."
Nothing is said about Stradella having been married or bethrothed.  Many of the women he had affairs with, however, were.  Weren't they the ones being unfaithful to their husbands and betrothed?  In which case the "infidelities" were not Stradella's, but those of his mistresses?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.206.187.183 (talk) 05:45, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "His" infidelities?
Talk:Shabazz

message: I removed the following sentence:
:In Arabic sha‘b‘azz translates to "a people mighty and glorious".
because it is false. Arabic šaʻb ʻazz is a complete sentence meaning "A people is mighty and glorious." "A mighty and glorious people" would be šaʻb ʻazīz. Rizome 03:17, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: shabazz was also a contestant on the seventh series of reality tv programme Bg Brother.  He was the first housemate to exit the house.
I'm not sure what to do with this, or whether it belongs in this article. It refers to Shahbaz Chauhdry of Big Brother UK, series 7. I've taken it out for now. Rizome 02:47, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There seems to be a problem with the Arabic text on this page. (I don't think it's my browser, because other pages with Arabic text, such as Arabic and Malik, display without any problem.)
Could somebody who knows Arabic fix it? Malik Shabazz 22:12, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for Help with Arabic 

message: Why did you revert the changes to the Shabbaz dab page and the Shabbaz (name) page?  It is convention to include lists of people with a shared surname on a name page instead of a dab page.  See WP:NAMELIST. Also Tribe of Shabbaz is not a person so you reverted a poorly worded description.  Why did you comment "That has nothing to do with the content on this page" mean?  What are you referring to? Coastside (talk) 03:23, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't understand the reversions either. Your actions seem to be the ones supported by the disambiguation guideline. Glades12 (talk) 17:00, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

text: Revert undone, to a version which conforms guidelines. Staszek Lem (talk) 18:20, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I endorse Staszek Lem's reversion. Not only does it comply with NAMELIST, it removes a totally unnecessary duplication of content on the DAB and name pages. Narky Blert (talk) 10:27, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of names moved to name page
Talk:Alvin Straight

message: Date of birth doesn't match tumbstone at Find-A-Grave. Lincher 03:19, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's because the article is wrong. You should have fixed it! I have now. Dan100 (Talk) 19:14, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of birth 

message: "He gained fame for traveling 240 miles ... At a top speed of five miles per hour, the journey took six weeks."  If his average speed was, shall we say, 2.5 mph, that implies he was only driving for about 16 hours a week.  Did he stop for long periods? Lfh 15:35, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Six weeks 

message: In the movie and even on your wikipage for the movie it says his name was Lyle.  Here it says it's Henry.  ValleyGirl78 (talk) 23:34, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brother's name
Talk:Paula Strasberg

message: Different birthdate than at Find-A-Grave. Lincher 03:23, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I used the New York Times obituary. --K72ndst 15:26, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you think the mention on her tumbstone could be wrong then??? Lincher 13:12, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It would not be the first time an actress had a discrepancy with the year of her birth. What do you suggest? I think the tombstone then. --K72ndst 15:09, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know what to suggest but just mentionning it on the WP article already solves the problem of it being re-checked and changed by somebody else. Lincher 12:21, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Year of birth is 1909 but her date of birth remains unknown. Does anyone know? Quis separabit? 19:32, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Dates

message: Born Pearl Miller as per , ,  and . Quis separabit? 22:03, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Birth name
Talk:George Stringer

message: More info at Find-A-Grave. Lincher 03:32, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 
Talk:Oakland (disambiguation)

message: It doesn't seem like there are any links on this page that are nearly as important as Oakland, CA. Anyone object to moving this to Oakland (disambiguation) and redirecting this to Oakland, California? --Zambaretzu 03:32, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I was surprised that this "Oakland" didn't redirect to Oakland, CA. So I would agree that this be moved. However unless it is a major city, I think Wikipedia usually leaves it as a disabigous page. But I think this fits the critrea of not being a disambigous page. Ted87 00:46, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moving to disambig 
Talk:Depictions of nudity

message: Isn't the idea that it has ever been commonplace to have two copies of the same picture, for display depending on the visitors,  more than a little fanciful?
:Frankly, it's absurd. I just added 'citation needed' to each of the three statements there. As far as I remember, Goya's two paintings were the first such experiment, copied afterwards.
As far as it goes, it would be more logical to have two different paintings, not necessarily one of a model vested and another of one nude, as there would be no question to why a painting of a woman not of the family was presented on the walls there.
::Looks like somebody forgot to sign. Nerd271 (talk) 02:33, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: "Two copies of the same picture"
Talk:M. S. Golwalkar

message: The lead section clearly states these two books were authored by M. S. Golwalkar. But following the recent controversy in Kerala regarding naming an institute after Golwalkar, the state RSS leaders have rejected certain contents of these books and has come up with a claim that both these books were not original works of Golwalkar. Bunch of Thoughts is a compilation of his speeches and thoughts made by a Rao and We, or Our Nationhood Defined is an independent translation of a Marathi work. I guess the lead sentence should be changed, including these details. 2001:7C0:205F:8001:0:0:0:173 (talk) 11:43, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bunch of Thoughts and We, or Our Nationhood Defined 

message: A couple of months ago, the 5th sentence of the lede read He was the first person to put forward the concept of a religion-based nation called "Hindu Rashtra" which is believed to have evolved into the concept of the "two nation theory", separate nations for Hindus and Muslims.
After various gradual changes, partially reverted, the sentence now reads He was not the first person to put forward the concept of a cultural nation called "Hindu Rashtra" which is believed to have evolved into the concept of the "akhand bharat theory", united nations for Bharatiyas.
I don't know the topic well enough to say off-hand whether any, all, or none of the changes is correct, and it's not really covered in the article body either. My gut feeling is that, at least, the "not" shouldn't be there – that's what made me start looking at the article history in the first place – and even if that is factually correct it does need to be rephrase because this only looks odd. --bonadea contributions talk 11:17, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confused introduction
Talk:Transferred intent

message: The doctrine is unecessary to achieve the purpose of holding the criminal or tortfeasor responsible for his wrongful acts. For example, murder is the ulawful killing of another human being with malice aforethought. One form of malice is the intent to kill. That is a person would be guilty of common law murder if he intended to kill and did kill another person. It is really of no consequence that he intend to kill a particular person and managed to kill somone else - the mental element - that he intends to kill another person - has been satisfied.--Jgard5000 (talk) 18:20, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, but this principle makes clear that it doesn't matter if your intent was to kill John and you kill Jill instead. That's the point. 173.160.189.21 (talk) 20:33, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Doctrine Unecessary

message: Transferred intent also applies to statements made where one or many individuals would act.
IE: An individual places a causant to murder (incitement to War), the individual itself wanting to murder, but not wishing to be the defacto individual whom pulls the trigger themselves.
IE: A statement made accorded a form of ´homebrew´ medical recipe that is known by the individual to be causant of damages, in conjunction with none knowlegability of the individual onto whom that is placed, resulting in a form of transferred intent.
The media itself falls foul onto this, and so does many a politician.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.92.204.150 (talk) 13:52, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  A small issue
Talk:Stony Point, New York

message: Hello Doodletown, it seems as if your additions to Stony Point (town), New York and Doodletown, New York are taken directly from http://www.daytrips.org/Doodletown/doodletown.html.  This may be a copyright violation; please review Wikipedia:Copyright FAQ. :: Salvo (talk) 03:44, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright issue?

message: — Assignment last updated by Patvil24 (talk) 22:19, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: History and Theory of New Media
Talk:Christina

message: There seem to be a number of "Christinas" out there... several saints, a singer, etc. Should this be a disambiguation page? --Izau 03:47, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

message: "Female intimate piercing" seems unncessarily euphemistic; why not just "female genital piercing"?  Which is what it is. Acantha1979 22:09, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Evangelical Union

message: How is "[eu]" "popular"? Most ppl would refer to it as "EU". It's like MTV is referred to as MTV, not [mtv]. Do you call it Toys "R" Us or Toys "Я" Us?  (For those who don't understand, the Toys R Us brandname uses a backward "R"). 
Just because an organisation decides to have some funky brandname does not mean that references to it must follow that.--Sumple (Talk) 03:48, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've never seen the Adelaide EU referred to as "[eu]". 192.43.227.18 06:58, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Changing "[eu]" to EU
Talk:List of ecologists

message: With the category system this page is redundant. With the category system it is autometically updated as new ecologists are added and they can be categoised into sub-cats. This page requires manual updating and does not have a suitable country classification system. Alan Liefting 03:50, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this page has value independent of the category pages, and it seems no one has recommended it for deletion in the 4+ years since the above comment. At present, this page and the category pages (Ecologists and American ecologists, for example) seem to have relatively little overlap. Also, this page seems more historical, while the others seem more concerned with living or at least recent ecologists. I think this page should be kept, at least until all ecologists on this list are categorized appropriately so they do appear on the other list(s). I'm working on that, albeit slowly.  --Araucana (talk) 14:10, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

text: *Per editing guidelines, no, the page isn't redundant to categories. See WP:NOTDUP, where it states, in part, "It is neither improper nor uncommon to simultaneously have a category, a list, and a navigation template which all cover the same topic. These redundant systems of organizing information are considered to be complementary, not inappropriately duplicative."... Northamerica1000(talk) 00:47, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Redundant page?

message: *
Northamerica1000(talk) 00:52, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Find sources
Talk:Doodletown, New York

message: I will change the heading to "Hiking' and remove the statement that certain trails are inaccessible in winter, as this is simply incorrect. Also, I  slightly re-worked the bit about access routes and removed references to novice, intermediate and advanced hikers. These terms are entirely subjective and potentially unhelpful.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Calamitybrook (talk • contribs) 02:41, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Tourism

message: Hello Doodletown, it seems as if your additions to Stony Point (town), New York and Doodletown, New York are taken directly from http://www.daytrips.org/Doodletown/doodletown.html.  This may be a copyright violation; please review Wikipedia:Copyright FAQ. :: Salvo (talk) 03:54, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright issue?

message: I've just written a new copyright-free version, (with more info on the trails and without the advertising-like tone of the other one). I did include a link to the site that the original version was ripped off from, since the tours are free, but all of the prose in the article is original. Kafziel 18:15, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the bold move, Kafziel. :) :: Salvo (talk) 02:17, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  New version 

message: Replaced "Winter" with" the winter season. Winter should not be capitalized at the end of a sentence. Very minor change. Trinidadiv 22:23, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammar Error 

message: :I added stuff without being very fussy. The basic info is certainly not controversial, but I note than somebody came by and wanted to see sources. I removed their  tags, but much agree that callingn Doodletown a "village" is doubtful given its limited population and lack of municipal government.
Calamitybrook (talk) 22:04, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Added citations

message: I'm going to remove the link to "Friends of Doodletown website" because it is now a spam page with risk of malware. I will include it here just for completeness, but ask that no one click it unless they are protected. http://www.doodletown.us/Doodletown/Home.html--174.44.106.14 (talk) 16:02, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links
Talk:List of Age of Mythology characters

message: Sorry about the edit summary. I was being attacked at the time. ЄИЄЯפЇЄ 03:55, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Mostly because I have no time to really do anything in the near future, someone should fix the large quantity of grammatical errors throughout the document. I'll get around to it as soon as I can, but it would be nice if I had help. Sephirothrr (talk) 02:49, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: English

message: Why is it that Kastor has all of the storyline of The New Atlantis, and Arkantos has only a summary of the Fall of Trident?ЄИЄЯפЇЄ 01:44, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No idea, I'll fix it ~  G1ggy!  Voice your opinions! 06:14, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Kastor and Arkanots

message: it says that chiron can be seen on a mountainside in the titans campaign in the place of prometheus, butive practically gone over it with a microscope and i havent found chiron chained to a rock anywhere. if theres no real evidence of it, it should be removed 69.108.67.221 (talk) 18:48, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Chiron

message: someone seems to be pointlessly editing in some characters who play absolutely no part in the campaign. i see achilles and "hoplite" on there.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.229.10.26 (talk) 00:10, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: vandalism
Talk:Maryland School for the Deaf

message: Got most of this information from the web-site.  I know it has some POV issues.  Please advise. Jerry G. Sweeton Jr. 03:58, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: March 2009

message: Hello, my fellows!
There is one important part of the beginning of the article that I thought it was important to state this.
We do have two campuses in the school itself. Maryland School for the Deaf has two campuses, one in Columbia, Maryland and the other one is in Frederick, Maryland. I know the article did mention that but I thought it is really important to mention it at the beginning of the article. That is just my opinion!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Miajgoldberg (talk • contribs) 17:42, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction 

message: I found https://www.baltimoresun.com/education/bs-md-deaf-education-20200904-hjmcfdmp75amfb3i5y6kgjhtsi-story.html
WhisperToMe (talk) 01:57, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article on controversy
Talk:The Smithsonian Institution (novel)

message: Smithsonian Institution (novel) → The Smithsonian Institution – The target page title is the proper name of the novel; Smithsonian Institution is known only in sentence context as "The Smithsonian Institution". A dab cross-reference would be put on each of these two articles as appropriate. — User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 03:57, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 04:00, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

text: Add any additional comments
It is not entirely clear what is proposed here. I support Smithsonian Institution for the actual institution; The Smithsonian Institution for the novel. Septentrionalis 00:29, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: :Add any additional comments
It is not entirely clear what is proposed here. I support Smithsonian Institution for the actual institution; The Smithsonian Institution for the novel. Septentrionalis 00:29, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Template talk:Today cell

message: If today is  , what will tomorrow be?
*Will it be  ? --Uncle Ed 04:04, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: If today is

message: The date is wrong. Or at least on my computer. Its one day ahead of the actual date. How is this fixed? Creation7689 (talk) 01:24, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Where are you posting from? When it was 9 p.m., December 8, 2010 in New York City, it was already December 9th in England. Our server uses Greenwich time. --Uncle Ed (talk) 22:54, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

text: You should be able to fix this by logging in and setting your Time zone under "My preferences". --Nobar (talk) 06:37, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong date
Talk:John Speed

message: Birthdate differs from Find-A-Grave. Lincher 04:07, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Speed prints do not command prices of "hundreds of thousands of pounds". Whole atlases might, as the reference states, but even that is only a prediction about an auction, not an established fact. Moreover, the reference says the price  might surpass 100,000, not "hundreds of thousands." It would be correct to replace "of" by "or" in "hundreds of thousands", but the reference does not directly confirm this. Therefore I replaced the whole assertion about price with a statement that Speed maps "are in high demand", which the reference does justify.
It would be reasonable to delete the entire topic, but someone else may do that Mdmi (talk) 21:44, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Price of prints 

message: This article is missing reference to his map The Kingdome of Scotland, a revision of a 1610 map, so it must have been completed some time before he died in 1630; it was posthumously published in 1662. I learned of it here.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  22:47, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''The Kingdome of Scotland'' 

message: :[Speed] is among the most famous of English mapmakers.
Are English mapmakers actually famous? In their day, did fans maintain vigils outside their abodes, hoping for a glimpse of them as they came and went? Could you stop someone in the street today, ask them to name a few famous mapmakers, and Speed's name would most likely be among them? This is a social phenomenon to which I've not previously had the pleasure of being exposed, but I'm prepared to be impressed, cartographically speaking. – AndyFielding (talk) 13:13, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Famous?
Talk:ABC Learning

message: A lot of this needs to be cleaned up in light of the 7:30 report on 26th August 2008, re-cutting of previous year profits, potential over-paying for assets and treatment of revenue. No doubt will change rapidly as court cases etc progress.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.219.59.165 (talk) 10:54, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

message: As Goodstart Early Learning took over ~650 of ABCs former locations possibly a separate page should be split off about them? In August 2012  this ABC page almost turned into one about Goodstart following edits by , but when I realised that, I reverted most of their edits. 
Goodstart Early Learning is currently a re-direct to the ABC page.
There is some info and sources in the edit history that would be relevant. - 220 of Borg 00:12, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split off Goodstart?
Talk:National Institute of Dramatic Art

message: No sign of why this text is here - remember WP:NOT SatuSuro 05:33, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: PR piece????

message: I've just done a bit of a tidy and update, but there's plenty of room for improvement still. I was in two minds as to whether to remove the entire Awards section, which seems superfluous as most of them relate to listed alumni and just adds to clutter that I don't think is particularly useful in an article about the institution. Thoughts, anyone? Laterthanyouthink (talk) 10:13, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Too much detail in Awards section