lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Fokker Next Gen

message: This article should describe Rekkof for what it is: an enduring unrealistic dream and vision. Andries 22:02, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Description

message: Why type "Canadair", when that name and company hasn't existed for over a decade and the current name of that business is commonly known globally. Please let "Bombardier Aerospace" be the correct reference and not some relic of the past that noone can refer to.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.219.194.237 (talk) 00:30, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Canadair is still used to refer to the RJ, it is the CRJ... Canadair Regional Jet, or if you like, the Bombardier Canadair Regional Jet. 76.66.196.229 (talk) 12:56, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Canadair
Talk:Chai Lee

message: Her film credits include Yellow Emanuelle
Really? Odd then that IMDB does not have it in her role list. 85.217.46.172 (talk) 02:33, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Dammit! It is there, but it's name is "Il mondo dei sensi di Emy Wong". Never would have guessed that. Quite straight translation of the name... 85.217.46.172 (talk) 02:36, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Functional structuralism

message: Functional structuralism is not the same as structural functionalism. This should not redirect. 69.114.216.105 22:04, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to turn the redirect into an article using appopriate references.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  22:11, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll do my very best. 146.96.81.149 20:49, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. Please consider registering, to facilitate communication.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  21:23, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Not the same as structural functionalism
Talk:Papovavirus

message: I've read multiple sources that reference this virus family as "Papovirus," without the "va."  I'm not sure if this is a new consensus, old consensus, or alternate name, but it warrants investigating.  It may have to do with the "va" no longer having any meaning; as stated in the article, the "va" was really just another part of "po."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.72.231.186 (talk) 16:52, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Mention alternate name?
Talk:Neil Smith (geographer)

message: What? An entry about a geographer without Le Kippois whining about it? Telling us to get a life as he scrupulously scans the discussion histories for misspellings and pointing out the obscure German antecedents to other (apparently more obscure) geographers' ideas. Surely it is only a matter of time before he registers his disgust here. What else could he be doing?24.145.146.190 22:07, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: As his death had already been announced on 28 September, shouldn't that day be assumed to have been the date of his death? Or has there been some technical issue involved I'm not aware of? --Axolotl Nr.733 (talk) 14:17, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of death
Talk:Huchuquan

message: Is it known positively that Huchuquan comes from the Luanti tribe? All indirect indicators are that he belonged to Qiang tribe, and in that case the article title is a misnomer. Barefact (talk) 15:14, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Bo Yang indicates that he was a Luanti.  Unless there is direct source that contradicts that, I think Bo can be trusted.  --Nlu (talk) 04:19, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Luanti vs Qiang
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Andrwsc

message: Category talk: 1  
Category: 136  
Image: 4  
Mainspace 11861  
Portal: 4  
Talk: 179  
Template talk: 87  
Template: 1822  
User talk: 266  
User: 140  
Wikipedia talk: 162  
Wikipedia: 133  
avg edits per article 1.94  
earliest 22:01, 7 February 2006  
number of unique articles 7641  
total 14795  
2006/2  340   
2006/3  364   
2006/4  48   
2006/5  6   
2006/6  130   
2006/7  1076   
2006/8  1308   
2006/9  476   
2006/10  2843   
2006/11  4661   
2006/12  463   
2007/1  1028   
2007/2  2052  
Edit count with User:Interiot's wannabe-Kate tool. Run at: "Wed Feb 21 22:10:47 2007 GMT". WjBscribe 22:12, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit count

message: In case anyone is wondering about the history of the project page: I started the RfA at User:Ligulem/work/Andrwsc and intended it to be moved here when accepted. Andrwsc copied it. Apologies for any confusion this might cause. I should have created the page at the correct location from the beginning, so it's my fault. --Ligulem 22:44, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I merged the user space draft's history into this one. Awyong J. M. Salleh 01:50, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! --Ligulem 07:41, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page history 

message: An obvservation: At the moment there are 7 opposes and zero neutrals. At least this is rare. I do find this odd. --Ligulem 09:45, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oppose vs Neutral 

message: Thanks to all who supported my nomination!  To those who were unsure of my ability, I promise that I will use the extra tools and extra responsibility wisely.  Andrwsc 23:23, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thanks
Talk:Divine Child High School

message: This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class because it uses the Category:Michigan stub on the article page.
*If you agree with this assessment, please remove this message.
*If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the  above to the appropriate class and removing the stub template from the article.
I am removing the "Bands" section of the article.  There is already a section that they are mentioned (under "Activities").  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.238.31.199 (talk) 06:57, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Barry Hinson

message: This page appears to have been copied from []. I removed the copyvio and left a stub. -killing sparrows 19:01, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  copyright violation 
Talk:Deng Zhi

message: I know there's a story about Deng and a monkey (there are 2 versions of the story), can anyone translate that and put it in the appraisal section? ----EkmanLi (talk) 06:59, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: You mean this: 華陽國志曰：芝徵涪陵，見玄猿緣山。芝性好弩，手自射猿，中之。猿拔其箭，卷木葉塞其創。芝曰：「嘻，吾違物之性，其將死矣！」一曰：芝見猿抱子在樹上，引弩射之，中猿母，其子為拔箭，以木葉塞創。芝乃嘆息，投弩水中，自知當死。 ?   LDS  contact me 06:53, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Deng Zhi and the monkey king
Talk:Huang Guangyu

message: Why spelling his name Wong Kwong Yu? He is a mainland Chinese, so should it not be spelt in pinyin? Or is Wong the way he writes his name himself in English? Mlewan (talk) 11:37, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling 
Talk:Bristol West (UK Parliament constituency)

message: The 2010 swings are wrong - they are calculated from the old boundaries. Fig (talk) 15:55, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: They are referenced to the BBC site, which compared with the notional 2005 result using the new boundaries. If tha actual 2055 result had been used the swing would have been slightly larger. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 17:06, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  2010 results 

message: The maps in the infobox actually relate to Avon, not Bristol.  Although Avon is a pre-1996 county, it seems that Wikipedia articles about parliamentary constituencies in general do use the old (1974-96) counties.  I'm not sure whether this is a mistake or whether it's still official to use the old counties for parliamentary purposes - as is also the case with police and fire authorities, for example - but anyway I've changed it back to Avon to be consistent. MFlet1 (talk) 15:30, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Avon 
Talk:Gibraltar Broadcasting Corporation

message: I really don't think GBC should be in a category called Gibraltarian media, 
the category should be Gibraltar media.
--Gibnews 22:27, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Gibraltarian versus Gibraltar

message: I want that page moved! It is too terrible! 2601:181:401:49B0:9D2A:A702:AEEA:655D (talk) 21:47, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aw, come on, man! This article has multiple issues!
Talk:Kingswood (UK Parliament constituency)

message: The % changes in the candidates between the 2005 and 2010 elections don't add up.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.149.51.236 (talk) 16:52, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Liu Du (warlord)

message: This notion that Liu Du (and the other southern Jing Province Administrators) were "warlords" comes only from the Romance. There is nothing in the SGZ to suggest that they were warlords, and in fact, we know that Jin Xuan was an official in Cao Cao's government before being appointed Administrator of Wuling. As far as we know, they are just officials. 
Also, the notion that they all (except Jin Xuan) served under Liu Biao is purely speculation. Never is it stated that they served under Liu Biao.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by XHolonX (talk • contribs) 06:10, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Warlords? Liu Biao?
Talk:Villeneuve-sur-Yonne

message: I've been doing communes and cantons in Herault, and am gonna start using your table for all the demographic charts I translate!
Is very nice.
T L Miles 20:13, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanx! A template for a simple table is not that fun, perhaps the option of showing the table as a chart could be more tempting. You've made me thinking ... will get in touch with you when I have something ready. Happy editing, STTW (talk) 10:08, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Have you considered making your demography table a template?
Talk:Liu Bao

message: finish editing
Laterzhan281 (talk) 01:23, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There seems to be some scholarly doubt whether Liu Yuan really was the son of (Liu) Bao and Bao's usage of the Liu surname. Rafe de Crespigny in his Biographical Dictionary of the Later Han, writes in his entry for Bao (listed as "Bao; Xiongnu" without surname): The Jin shu ... says that Bao held the Liu surname and was the father of Liu Yuan. The modern scholar Tang Changru, however, has argued that this was no more than a propaganda attempt to identify Liu Yuan with the great imperial lineages of the past. I do not have access to Tang's work, but it's worth noting that Bao must have been an old man (though not impossibly so) when Liu Yuan was born, as he can hardly have been born later than 180.    Fornadan (t) 07:08, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Parentage of Liu Yuan
Talk:Li Feng (Cao Wei)

message: There were three different people named 'Li Feng' from the Three Kingdoms period.
One of them served Yuan Shu.
Another who was styled Anguo(安国) served Wei.
The last one was the son of Li Yan who served Shu. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lonelydarksky (talk • contribs) 13:54, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Three 'Li Feng's
Talk:Star Wars (manga)

message: Information about volumes. Does anyone have any information of the volumes?--Animasage 22:39, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Sorry to have boldly moved the article without discussion, I did not think it would be controversial. Regarding this, I'm of a mind that the topic of the article is Star Wars manga collectively, not a specific manga series named Star Wars. Note that I did not capitalize the M, though it seems as though the proper names of the individual books may be STAR WARS MANGA: THE EMPIRE STRIKES BACK etc. This would still preclude the parenthetical disambiguation.— TAnthonyTalk 20:40, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name
Talk:Total enclosure fetishism

message: I see lots of weasel words here. "Often," "some," "sometimes" Please someone write this who ISN'T into this fetish. ForestAngel 22:41, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I also noticed on the section about zentai suits, only the term "Zentai" is a hyperlink and not PVC or anything else. So that also sends off red lights to me. ForestAngel 23:02, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've fixed it. It seems ok now. --Qsaw (talk) 08:55, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: clean-up
Talk:Kruševlje

message: Believe it or not, but the protected version of this page seems the more correct one. István 20:46, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it is not. However, I propose that some Wikipedia administrator who is neither Hungarian or Serb propose compromise here. PANONIAN (talk) 13:47, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Admirable! Let's go for neutrality. Although, if we use your own principle that you have stated many times, nobody with any negative feelings toward Serbia should ever be allowed to contribute to Serbia-related articles. And in the aftermath of this, you might find it hard to find people with not even the slightest negative feeling toward Serbia! K. Lásztocska 18:00, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: But exact purpose of Wikipedia is objectivity - it is not place for people to express their frustrations and their negative opinions about Serbia especially in this article which speak just about one small village. Even article about Adolph Hitler is written with no negative attitude towards him, and if article about him does not have it, why article about village in Serbia should have negative attitude towards Serbia? In fact, if we start to writte negative attitudes here, then it is not only Serbia about which we can say something negative - the negative attitude could be also used towards Habsburgs who destroyed Serb village of Kruševlje and colonized it with Germans! So, you see, negative attitudes can go in both directions, but if we use standards of Wikipedia, we should not use negative attitude towards anything here, that is a basic principle of NPOV article. PANONIAN (talk) 18:33, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A careful reading of the article reveals that it is written objectively and not with a "negative attitude".  It is not the most stylistic piece on the Wiki, but it does not present the topic unfairly. István 19:30, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The question here is not about whole article but about certain parts of it which are not written objectively and which are indeded written with negative attitude - read this whole talk page and you will see detailed explanations about this. PANONIAN (talk) 11:06, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Protected Version
Talk:Frédéric-César de La Harpe

message: La Harpe or LaHarpe? Ericoides (talk) 05:28, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 
Talk:Hanns Scharff

message: Hello,
I'm a journalist and was very impressed by this article on  Hans-Joachim Scharff.  Well done -- truly.  
If possible, I've very much like to contact the main author of the article -- I've just got one or two quick questions.  I can be reached at eyewitness@earthlink.net
Thanks very much.
Regards,
Josh  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.174.181.78 (talk) 07:54, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you, and I've emailed you so be on the lookout for it.  The article is nowhere near finished, but other priorities have put finishing it on the backburner.  I estimate I'm only about 1/3-1/2 of the way done with the text, and then I need to add the photos.  Thanks for your interest.  --ScreaminEagle (talk) 15:51, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trying to reach the main author of this article 

message: Claude Stokes was definitely not a 58th victim of Red Baron, neither he was killed by him at all. Capt. (not-Lt.Col.) Claude Stokes was the last allied fighter pilot shot down in the WWI (7.11.18). The relation to Margaret is unknown to me. Question is, who did make up this 'legend'.
:To whomever wrote this comment, would you be willing to contact me via my talk page since you are not a registered user and I have no other way of contacting you?  Thank you for the heads-up--I've done quite a bit more research as a result.  --ScreaminEagle (talk) 20:16, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect data, from the reference material itself 

message: The link to the fifth reference doesn't lead to anything right now.  If it doesn't work later on, please delete it.
~~  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bestmj33001 (talk • contribs) 01:13, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference 

message: There is no mention of this man in the German Wikipedia. If they themselves do not make an article about this person, what does that tell us?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:8388:540:9900:71E4:75DE:11A9:E465 (talk) 07:37, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article might be a hoax 
Talk:Du Yuesheng

message: Some one keeps inserting unsourced kung fu material into this article.  I am again going to undo this apparent vandalism.  If anyone has sourceable material alleging Du Yuesheng's use of 'taoist mystical knowledge,' let's discuss the insertion.MWShort (talk) 14:44, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This is really hilarious. I once read that Du strangled a union leader at a dinner party in 1927. I didn't imagine at the time that he could have done it like Darth Vader: "I find your lack of capitalism... disturbing."Ferox Seneca (talk) 00:51, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Du's mystical powers

message: He is also know in books and articles as "Big Eared Tu."  There should be a re-direct from "Big Eared Tu" to this page. 64.53.191.77 (talk) 16:44, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: Was this title ever used to describe him historically? Or was this a term developed by Media created after his death?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlbertOfPrussia (talk • contribs) 03:27, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "King/Lord of Shanghai" 

message: "The resulting massacre ended the First United Front, and as a reward for Du's service, Chiang appointed him as the president of the National Board of Opium Suppression Bureau. The end result was that Du came to officially control the entirety of China's opium trade.[citation needed]" The book Policing Shanghai, 1927-1937 by Frederic Wakeman Jr says this as well, but the source offered is not something I can access: Madancy, Joyce Ann. "Propaganda Versus Practice: Official Involvement in the Opium Trade in China, 1927-1945." M.A. thesis, Cornell University, 1983. If anyone has access to the Cornell library they could probably look that up to verify it. 2603:6081:2340:23A:0:0:0:3F6 (talk) 19:24, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opium Suppression citation
Talk:Lu Tong

message: Most biography indicates other dates for birth and death... of course it is an estimation. From 755 to 795 for birth. From 805 to 850 for death. --Sdevaux (talk) 11:29, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates 

message: chinese, dates, history.
icetea8 13:51, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: added material
Talk:United Kingdom commemorative stamps 1990–1999

message: Why do the Diana Commemorative stamps that were issuied after her death not appear in this list? Katie1971  ( Let's talk!! ) 16:45, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Because no one has added them. That is one of the problems with list that are not maintained, or completed. ww2censor (talk) 03:42, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Diana stamps
Talk:Carl Ditters von Dittersdorf

message: This article is fraught with errors, because it has absolutely no relation to the latest scholarly Dittersdorf literature.--88.117.70.104 (talk) 18:32, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: And he was born "in[!] the Laimgrube"? This is hilariously false.--194.166.20.66 (talk) 18:25, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: He was born "in the Laimgrube (now Mariahilf) district of Vienna". The sentence is fine. I'm not vouching for the quality of the rest though.--Cookerid (talk) 08:38, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: If you actually knew what the Laimgrube was, you'd know that one cannot be born "in the Laimgrube".--2A02:8388:8180:B000:15CA:3BF3:EB6C:CE11 (talk) 11:39, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Errors 

message: No, he wasn't. One needn't go to Vienna to apply for a title of nobility.--2A02:8388:8180:B000:15CA:3BF3:EB6C:CE11 (talk) 11:37, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Ditters was sent to Vienna"
Talk:Lamy (and Rinck)

message: The Wiki police have flagged this article for its lack of references.  However, this article is about an important but rare book (catalogue), fundamental for Peruvian philately.  The catalogue and its authors are clearly given in the text, where they should appear.  The book itself is its own the reference.  Should I also add it to some token list of references?  What other reference is required?
The need for this brief Lamy article is simple.  Go to any source or display of Peruvian stamps and the searcher will find almost all classics described by reference to Lamy.  But who or what is Lamy?  It is like some obscure code until one discovers from Wikipedia that Lamy is the way that early Peruvian stamps are distinguished  (by their cancellations).
Perhaps the same person flagged the article for its lack of links.  The problem is what to link it to, since the main article on Peruvian philately has never been developed.  Why link to an article that has one token sentence, uninformative on the subject, and which happens to contain two (admittedly small) inaccuracies?  At present, such a link is a dead end, but I'll make it anyway.
(I made a little progress on these issues today, 2/20/12.)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lastudies (talk • contribs) 02:28, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The book may be a reference for its own existence, year of publication, names of authors, and so on. But it may not cite the number of copies printed, and certainly doesn't cite the existence of a later, pirated edition. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:59, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:Ali Erdemir

message: The claim that Ali Erdemir, or anyone else for that matter, has broken a friction record at any point in time is absolutely false.  First of all, the idea of breaking a friction record is absurd.  No serious scientist in the field of tribology would even try to break a friction record because serious scientists do not aim to discover the lowest, or highest, or the tallest, or the smallest etc. of anything.  Serious scientists try to discover scientific facts that are interesting and useful to humanity.  Furthermore, measuring the lowest recorded friction in a lab is fraught with many problems:  How do we know whether this person measured correctly?  Were there any witnesses who are knowledgeable enough to verify this feat?  In order to measure a very small amount of friction, we have to measure a very small amount of force.  The possibility of errors in measuring a tiny amount of force is extremely high.  Secondly, how do we even know that the surfaces were in contact?  If two surfaces are not in contact, the friction is zero.  How do we know that the normal force on the surfaces were non-zero?  If the normal force is zero, then the friction force is also zero.  Perhaps Erdemir didn't have the surfaces in contact or didn't have a non-zero normal force and that's why he measured a low friction.  I don't know where to begin about the absurdity of such a claim.  Simply put, no one has broken a friction record, let alone Mr. Erdemir.  If you make a simple google search, you will find that there is no serious publication in the world that would collaborate this claim.  The concept of breaking a friction record itself is absurd.  Please remove such claims from this article.
Vikiyazar (talk) 21:59, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Friction record
Talk:Ogwen Cottage

message: Hello! During late June, July and some of August, I'm working on a paid project sponsored by the National Trust to review and enhance coverage of NT sites. You can find the pilot edits here, as well as a statement and contact details for the National Trust. I am leaving this message when I make a first edit to a page; please do get in touch if you have any concerns. Lajmmoore (talk) 15:48, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  National Trust pilot