Talk:Ronald Mallett

message: How far has he proceed to build the thing?
::I second the request. What's the current status of his project?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.67.35.214 (talk) 16:09, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: 87.074%. - 82.16.12.184 (talk) 12:26, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been nearly four years since the Discovery channel special on his project. What's going on with it?173.58.53.212 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 19:56, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Another two years and nothing. Is Ron Mallet still involved with this project?173.58.96.84 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 04:44, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: How far has he proceed?

message: Wait a second! I wrote the article, but I'm not sure: Is his last name spelled with one or two Ts? I just noticed that I had it both ways!! I think it's one T. I'm going to check on that, but if you do it before I do, then that's good, too. Steveo2
I wish someone would mention his interview on Coast to Coast with Art Bell.
:Two Ts according to his homepage. I fixed the image caption. Rl 11:20, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: One T according to the cover of his book (just read, hence reading this page), but I guess a web page is more accurate.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.155.193.120 (talk) 17:30, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

text: Good grief, the man's an academic. Check Google Scholar for his published papers. The only time you find it with one "t" is when he is referenced by someone who is not Ronald Malle tt. JohndanR (talk) 14:29, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: How Many Ts!?!

message: The age information on the page is not mathematically correct.  Since the info is also uncited, We should work toward finding citations for the claims about the year of his father's death, the year he earned his Ph.D. and definitely cite his motivation for working on time travel. As far as I'm concerned, The info should probably be removed until it can be properly substantiated according to WP:BLP.  I will tackle this unless someone else has good reason why it should remain.Pihanki 02:58, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Age Information

message: A photo of the man should be there.there is on avaailable on the site listed on the page.<http://www.physics.uconn.edu/~mallett/main/main.htm>
:A photo has been added. The photo was provided by himself by my request. Also the date of birth was incorrect according to Ronald L Mallett in his email message sent to me. I corrected the date of birth--Senthi (talk) 02:48, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: No Photo

message: This page is a slap in the fact to Dr. Mallet. Half of it objects to his work. Put more info about his work and start a new page for the objections.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Radicalcentrist1990 (talk • contribs) 04:24, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tactless 

message: I cannot see, from the article's description of his work, without more article details, how it is that things can be made to go back in time, as Mallett's work is described in his appearances on YouTube clips of Discovery Channel / TLC shows.  Conventional energy fields, can only accelerate matter, up to speeds approaching the speed of light, which causes their time to lorentzian "contract" to slower rates.  No?  Particle accelerators, for example, use electromagnetic waves in the radio regieme to only accelerate particles upto speeds all slower than light, and so they "tick" slower at the relativistic speeds.  Like muons that normally last microseconds, but can last many times longer when nearing the speed of light, before decaying.  Matter-energy-space configurations can only affect matter-energy-space configurations into slower time frames of reference, all below the speed of light, or at the speed of light for photons related to the matter-energy-space configurations. LoneRubberDragon (talk) 18:47, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What can light do for time travel, versus a weapon? 

message: Too much for my small brain to take in. But I would say whoever gets a time machine working would be infinitely powerful. So govs around the world must be or must have been beavering away on this for some time. It makes sense.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.193.29.27 (talk) 22:35, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  way over my head 

message: The sun goes estimated 240 km/sec and the earth rotates around constantly around the sun,wich also has enourmous distances.
The math behind this is enormous. Anyone ever inventing a time machine should make it capable of traveling and landing from space to earth.
The speed it takes could break the machine apart.
The risc is even when a time machine would be possible, the space between this time and the other is enormous.
The time machine and the route it takes could break apart, even when a small timegap would be possible the small timegap to only give a message could break because of the huge distance,considering it would be constantly stretching out over time.
If the machine would be possible and turned on , any future traveler to now would only allow 1 traveler at the beginning and stepping in and out of the machine at the same time would cause danger like 1000 of the same person going in or out of the time machine at once, therefore every time the time machine would be on , the time needs to be noted,to allow only 1 future traveler or message trough in time.
For example I go in the door and out the door at the same time would be a bad idea,and I would probably get stuck in time. 
Also the problem how to control this time machine , going to the exact time you want,for example that the time machine works but brings you instead of 1 year further/back 10 year .
Going into the time and going back would be like going to 2 places in the same line example: collission with self, so would need build new time machine to go back,or needing to avoid this somehow.
--85.151.35.218 (talk) 12:12, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dangers 

message: Hi, had some ideas that might enable time travel on a limited (ms) scale proportional to the path delay relevant to high frequency trading. I have emailed Mallett and others but as yet no reply. As this has national security implications I hope that it helps that my intentions are benign and the physics are far more relevant as is determining the existence of something in the Earth's core which up until now has had no direct evidence. Also working on a larger scale experiment but am keeping this quiet for now until I get this physics paper compiled.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.3.100.25 (talk) 07:18, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Core 

message: Hello Ronald I was just wondering how far you can go back in time? The reason for that is I want to save my marriage and that would be the only thing I can do is to go back in time and save it from the start. If you respond that would be awesome!
Sincerely Bradley  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pandabearr56 (talk • contribs) 06:02, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: When you will give us time mach@ 106.51.119.124 (talk) 13:29, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: New section means 106.51.119.124 (talk) 13:48, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Time machine  

message: @ 106.51.119.124 (talk) 13:45, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  When you will give time travel machine  

message: Add a section break. Select where you want a new section to begin. Go to Layout > Breaks. The types of section breaks are highlighted on the Layout tab. 106.51.119.124 (talk) 14:02, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  New section