Talk:Closed-circuit television

message: When I enter CCTV it will be redirected here.
But CCTV also means China Central Television.
--Peterxj108 (talk) 13:34, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a note at the top of the article directing people to CCTV (disambiguation) which lists China Central Television. SilkTork *YES! 22:25, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

text: Thanks for the ping L.Willms. CCTV redirects here because Closed-circuit television is regarded as the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. In the West (well, at least in the UK), CCTV is the most common phrase for closed-circuit television, and the full term is actually not often used - examples: , , , , , , , etc. It is possible, though, that I am looking at this via a UK perspective. You may consider listing the redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion to get a wider perspective. SilkTork (talk) 10:36, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  CCTV!=Closed-circuit television  

message: This article seems massively outdated given the proliferation of domestic CCTV in last few years (such as video doorbells and home cameras). The intersections of domestic surveillance and the role of domestic CCTV operators as "data handlers" deserves treatment here, but the article is so messy I was quite sure where it should be introduced. I vote that this article be overhauled.
:It's absolutely a good point, but the only way it's going to change is if you start changing it!  "Voting" to overhaul the article is meaningless if no-one is taking the votes - there's not a committee that decides these things, it's up to you the individual editor. Be Bold used to be our slogan here. --Wtshymanski (talk) 17:52, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Domestic CCTV 

message: The article 960H Technology is (a) mis-capitalized ("Technology" should be lowercase), (b) a complete orphan (nothing links to it, anywhere), and (c) a stub with far too narrow a focus to ever expand into a full article. The tiny amount of unique information it contains can easily be rolled into this article on the only common application of 960H video. I'm therefore proposing to do exactly that. -- FeRDNYC (talk) 13:02, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps a better target would be List of common resolutions. Klbrain (talk) 23:36, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

text: Support merge into List of common resolutions :3 F4U (they/it) 23:17, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  Klbrain (talk) 09:46, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Propose merge of [[960H Technology]] into this article 

message: Hello,
Information created on Wiki is wrong.
That is not CC TV and it's an irrelevant word people spread mouth to mouth (like Xerox.)
CC camera is the appropriate word.
Closed Circuit Camera, that's all, video footage we can view by TV, computer monitor, LDC screen or any video output devices.
Now what is point to call CCTV?
Regards,
Suresh CS
106.206.5.56 (talk) 05:51, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name calling "CC TV" camera is irrelevant , current one is "CC Camera" only 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Bensci54 (talk) 17:59, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Closed-circuit television →  – The modern common name, and already redirects here. The "CCTV" term is in decline, since this technology today generally doesn't involve televisions at all, but video footage saved to dedicated hard drives or NVMe storage, and viewed on computer screens. It's possible that CCTV could actually be split to a separate article on "legacy" technology for video surveillance, but that doesn't really seem necessary.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  22:27, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

text: I think that is a good recommendation. The arguments makes sence.Myotus (talk) 22:38, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 8 February 2024 

message: The law required CCTV cameras in banks so that they could get FDIC insurance. 2600:1700:D591:5F10:58A7:B7B:224D:779F (talk) 13:41, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs mention of the USA Bank Protection Act of 1968