lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:United States Naval Institute

message: " the organization has no official or funding ties to the Academy or the U.S. Navy." 
Has this status been this way for the whole lifetime of USNI? Many USNI books have been used by United States Naval Academy as textbooks for courses at the Academy. It may be a matter of convenience; need a textbook, professors notes only need minor additional work to become a textbook, then where do you go for printer / publisher? Also, on occasions, material is extracted from official, public domain US Navy documents, training or other manuals for USNI published books. 
--24.245.106.83 (talk) 22:10, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Actual Status ?  

message: A few days ago, I put a cite needed tag on this sentence: "The magazine has been known to address controversial and contentious issues, resulting in it being banned by the military on a few occasions." Stithians78 has replaced the tag with a citation that does not support the sentence. (It might support this sentence: "In 1962, DoD officials prevented a Marine Corps lieutenant colonel from sending to Proceedings an article about a 1949 proposal to merge the Marines' aviation units into the Air Force.") Unless better citations are forthcoming, I'm going to delete the uncited assertion. PRRfan (talk) 18:14, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: On second thought, I've gone ahead and edited to preserve the citation and more accurately reflect what happened. PRRfan (talk) 18:18, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: uncited "Banned"
Talk:William Maule, 1st Baron Panmure

message: I see no evidence for the following:
:Lord Panmure created a scandal when he departed to Italy with Christina Mackay. He remained with her, predominantly in Italy, until his death in 1852. Together they had one illegitimate child, James Mackay, who married Deborah Lyle of Nova Scotia. The second son of James and Deborah was James Mackay, 1st Earl of Inchcape.
Anybody who finds a source for this is welcome to readd it. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 21:11, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Inchcape
Talk:Louise of Lorraine

message: This is an odd title.  Shouldn't it be either Louise de Lorraine or Louise de Lorraine-Mercoeur, to identify the actual sub-branch of the Lorraine family she came from?  No other late 16th century members of the House of Lorraine are referred to by a form including the obsolete sub-branch name "Vaudémont," which they all belonged to. john k 22:23, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Apparently, she married Henry during his reign as King of Poland. Wasn't she then queen of Poland? Was it neccessary to crown the Polish monarch's consort in order to call her queen? The Spy Who Came in from the Cold (talk) 10:39, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: He had left Poland by then, but that title was not formally removed from him until May. If she was queen of Poland it was merely as a technicality and she may not even have been aware of it herself. --Aciram (talk) 20:17, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Queen of Poland 

message: For some reason, these were listed in the Ancestors as Jan I and Jan II (but the links went to the right articles...). I've changed these to the English names (as in the Wikipedia articles) and what appears to be the correct regnal numbers III and IV. I and II were two quite different and far earlier people. My attention was drawn to this while having a transatlantic (and transcontinental) conversation with a distant (in two ways) cousin for whom I have done research on some obscure subjects. Unlike my cousin, I'm no specialist in this subject. I am prepared to listen to arguments if anyone can produce a good reason for the original figures. Peridon (talk) 19:33, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Looking further into it, I've corrected William II as well. The original regnal figures appear to be in the first posting of the tree, which was later corrected by another to give the right target, but leaving the incorrect entry showing. I'll check the rest against the chart I've received. Peridon (talk) 19:41, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Two more: Frederick I should have been VI, and Louis I is now III. Unfortunately, this makes them red links. The tree now looks OK to me, but don't take my word for it. I definitely couldn't create a tree at all, and have great admiration for those who can. Peridon (talk) 19:55, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  John III and John IV of Egmont 

message: Hello everyone. In the article and infobox, it says that Louise was Queen of Poland and Grand Duchess of Lithuania by marriage, but she is not included on the list of Polish or Lithuanian consorts. Is there a reason for this?
:She was never actually Queen of Poland and Grand Duchess of Lithuania. Her spouse had left his position as ruler of Poland and Lithuania before they married in february, but he was not formally deposed from them until May, thus she had the same titles as a pure technicality, but likely never actually used them, and never functioned as such, never stepping foot in Poland. No point having her in those lists. --Aciram (talk) 20:15, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Queen of Poland and Grand Duchess of Lithuania
Talk:Mark 36 SRBOC

message: Article is written in a way that suggests Flyrt is actually complemented by an available system, but it was never put into production. It's not even linked from the piece ... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naval_Research_Laboratory_Flyrt 2601:58B:D80:6C60:7874:E8FA:BA14:67F4 (talk) 11:13, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. I've made changes to the article. Findingmoney100 (talk) 21:14, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flyrt info misleading
Talk:Barskoon

message: I propose to rename the article to Barskoon, which is both the Kyrgyz and Russian official spelling and is also commonly used in Russian, e.g. on :ru:Барскоон. - Toothswung (talk) 09:08, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The Kyrgyz Wikipedia article is called Barskon, see :ky:Барскон. Glatisant (talk) 06:24, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:United States Navy Dental Corps

message: This article is largely written in the 1st person and is just generally bad.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.38.68.72 (talk) 01:11, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

message: In the early history of the Dental Corps, several individuals held the office of Chief several times. I'm not positive on how they were officially numbered. EG, was L. Williams officially both the 5th and 7th Chief, or just the 5th? I know for certain Woofter is the 33rd, and Wagner is the 36th, so once the middle of the table is filled out, we can go back and verify the numbering for Williams, Rault, and Chandler. Evvekk (talk) 16:02, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Numbering for Chief table
Talk:Naval Air Station Alameda

message: Not sure what article it should be aimed at, but "Alameda Airport" mentioned here, which is obviously in California, is a redirect aimed at Cottonwood Mall (Albuquerque, New Mexico). Obvious borkage. 2601:2C5:4101:7C55:DA9:2063:1F5C:40CD (talk)   — Preceding undated comment added 21:36, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken Redirect
Talk:Navy League of the United States

message: We cannot simply copy this page. It's a reliable source, if one with a point of view; but the Navy League has a right tot their own words.Please see WP:Copyvio Septentrionalis PMAnderson 21:57, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually as a work of the US Govt there's a good chance it's in the public domain. But it should be attributed. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 18:59, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright violation

message: As can be seen at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alfred Thayer Mahan Award for Literary Achievement these awards are not holding up to Wikipedia standards of notability. I've searched hard and can't find third-party sources that discuss the award in depth. So rather than deleting the material I've merged it here. The remaining awards should have similar treatment - if/when that were to happen it would justify the creation of a new article called Navy League Sea services awards (or whatever they are called a group) which it should be possible to source for notability as a group. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 18:59, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Awards
Talk:Solson Publications

message: I did some modifications on the page by mistake. Please ignore and put the page in the earlier stage (and delete this note, too. ;-J)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.217.65.104 (talk) 21:12, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modifications 

message: I have an actual copy of Reagan's Raiders; it is every bit as aweful as rumored. Surely a company that can produce such products with worthy of note, but it is difficult to find out more about the company.  rewinn 22:26, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: Although I can see why someone might think that from the title, Sultry Teenage Super-Foxes is not a TMNT parody.  It is not about anthropomorphic animals, but rather about teenage girls with elemental super powers.  It's more like a porn version of some cheesy superhero group, not of TMNT.  Since the comic doesn't even superficially resemble the Ninja Turtles, I'm going to remove the parody remark, unless someone can cite a reason (such as creator comments) to show it really is.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.117.107.182 (talk) 04:47, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  TMNT Parody?
Talk:S9G reactor

message: How come the propulsion system shows as S9G and both S10N? GE don’t produce those propulsion systems since they went out of business on that particular unit. The N stands for Northrop Grumman 2601:646:9B80:AF50:7D12:293B:2CB0:294C (talk) 01:19, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:   S9G ?
Talk:Fleet ballistic missile submarine

message: Does anybody think this short article should be merged into Ballistic missile submarine ?  H Padleckas (talk) 18:36, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Concur, and Done! As this entire article was unsourced, I didn't feel the need to actually merge any content to the other page, but am not opposed to it if someone sees something useful that tthey can source. - BillCJ (talk) 21:56, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Ballistic missile submarine]]
Talk:John Kirk Townsend

message: Wow.  Somebody just cut and pasted sections of this article http://www.academia.edu/1003940/Review_of_John_Kirk_Townsend_Collector_of_Audubon_s_Western_Birds_and_Mammals into Wikipedia (or vice versa).  I will do some copyedits to paraphrase.  —Gaff ταλκ 23:46, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  copyvio 
Talk:Tourism in Mexico

message: * Acapulco
* Bonampak
* Campeche
* Cancún
* Chichen Itza
* Coba
* Cozumel
* El Tajín
* Guadalajara
* Guanajuato
* Isla Mujeres
* Los Cabos
* Mazatlán
* Mexico City
* Monte Alban
* Monterrey
* Oaxaca
* Palenque
* Playa del Carmen
* Puerto Escondido
* Puerto Morelos
* Puerto Vallarta
* Querétaro
* Riviera Maya
* San Miguel de Allende
* San Cristóbal de las Casas
* Teotihuacan
* Tijuana
* Tulum
* Uxmal
* Veracruz
* Yaxchilan
* Zacatecas
That list is too long, this material should be merged to this page, if needed.Kevlar67 22:29, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge from [[List of popular tourist regions]]

message: I have worked on this article to bring it up to WP standards. I am removing the tags. Amuseclio (talk) 16:31, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing tags 

message: The information for this is misleading. The song referred to dates to 1939 while the Jazz Age of the 1920s and Prohibition was repealed in 1933. 
100.15.127.199 (talk) 02:12, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "South of the Border" song =

message: I have been doing research on the consequences of tourism on local populations, and I plan on adding information about the economic, social, and environmental effects, both positive and negative. I believe this addition will provide a more holistic perspective on the tourism industry in Mexico because the local people are very connected to the success of the industry but often ignored. At the moment, except for a couple sentences, their voices are completely left out of the article. Emma.h.s (talk) 18:35, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Edits 
Talk:Mark 13 missile launcher

message: The Mk22 guided missile launch system is a smaller version of the Mk13 launcher with a sixteen round capasity.--Two way time (talk) 15:06, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur with retitling the page to be consistent with current nomenclature. --tom (talk) 18:23, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

message: all listed have been decomissioned
France, 4 T 47 class or Surcouf class modified - 1968 to 1970
Japan - 6 DDGs Hatakaze class, Tachikaze class, 	Amatsukaze
perhaps more to come
Wfoj3 (talk) 01:59, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other Ships with launcher
Talk:North Atlantic Squadron

message: i can't document it ,but i remeber a song with this title. the chorus went:
so away, away with a fife and drum,
here we come, full o' rum,
lookin' for women who'll peddle their bum,
to the north atlantic squadron.
Toyokuni3 (talk) 04:15, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Bawdy song

message: There was a US North Atlantic Fleet during the Civil War.  This article should be expanded to include it.--Toddy1 (talk) 10:45, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Before the 1890s
Talk:David Douglas (botanist)

message: According to the mountaineering page, Mount Washington was climbed in 1642 by Darby Field, so this seems to contradict the above statement. 90.242.7.48 08:30, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  First mountaineer in North America? 
Talk:Fulda Symphonic Orchestra

message: Does anyone else think this orchestra's Brass section is terrible?  I've been listening to Mozart and Beethoven recordings by this symphony and their trombone are flat and their horns are all over their place.  Strings and winds are very good, however.  Kntrabssi 22:32, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

message: Amateur orchestra only, that performs only one concert program per year. --FordPrefect42 (talk) 16:42, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 
Talk:William Jackson Hooker

message: The  section introduces the forename "Farrer" (or possibly the composite surname "Farrer Hooker").  No other use of the name "Farrer" occurs in this article, nor can I find any connection to that name.  Is this just a simple mistake?  yoyo (talk) 06:58, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why "Farrer" Hooker?
Talk:Naval Surface Warfare Center

message: Two different sites at Indian Head, MD?  Or is that a mistaken duplicate?  If so, then are there only nine sites?  If not where is the 10th?  twfowler (talk) 21:37, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Looking at the code, there are some details that are lost.  One is the Explosive Ordnance Disposal Technology Division, and the second bullet is for Indian Head Naval Surface Warfare Center.  Should this text be added?  Would it look too weird since the others are just the locations without the details on the specialties? Fustigate314159 (talk) 23:30, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: February 2013
Talk:National Naval Aviation Museum

message: Is there any logic behind the listing of the aircraft on display? Because if so I can't see it, the list isn't alphabetical, chronological or fixed-wing then rotary (or vice versa). Also there seem to be a few overlaps: is the "Bell HH-1K Iroquois (Former HA(L)-5 Gunship in HA(L)-3 Configuration)" different from the "Bell HH-1K Huey"? Is the "Bell HTL-4" different from the "Bell HTL Sioux (TH-13)"? I would fix it but decided to ask here first. Mztourist (talk) 08:39, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Frankly I'm unsure how to approach it. The museum's website here:  Browse Aircraft lists alphabetically by designation, but to me having the A6M2 Zero in between the A4D-1 Skyhawk and AF-2S Guardian doesn't seem right, while the Exhibits section doesn't set out which aircraft form which exhibit. So I'm inclined to separate into fixed and rotary wing and reorder alphabetically by manufacturer, do you agree? Mztourist (talk) 03:51, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logic? 

message: We drove down to the coast to visit the museum only to learn that it is closed to the public.  Your tax dollars at work...DrHenley (talk) 14:36, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Closed to public
Talk:Naval Air Station Whiting Field

message: I think it would be integral to the encyclopedia to have an external link for the Whiting Field base directory, so people moving there or looking for information can find it easily. I work on this and it does not require you to sign up, it's free, and it's owned and run by Veterans and spouses. Please let me know if anyone objects, and otherwise I'll add it. Here's the link: http://basedirectory.com/navy/nas-whiting-field-directory Thanks!
Navyswo (talk) 05:19, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: NAS Whiting Field Base Directory?
Talk:Newport-class tank landing ship

message: 2500@14 kts it's too short for a Newport class ship, i suspect a misprint or sometimes, at examples on navypedia.org is reported as 14250@14 kts87.17.239.45 (talk) 17:32, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  the range it's too short for be right
Talk:Windows Firewall

message: Please do not upload any screenshots of Windows Vista using the Basic UI, unless demonstrating the different Vista user interfaces. Themodernizer 22:36, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Whatever, man.  This article isn't about the user interface, this is about the firewall MMC console, which is amply demonstrated by the screenshot, and looks and works the same regardless of theme.  Vista Basic -is- the Vista theme for quite a number of machines.  If you want to upload an equivalent image using the Aero Glass theme, feel free to do so, but don't remove images from the encyclopedia that adequately demonstrate what's being discussed in the article in question.   -/- Warren 03:40, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

text: p.s. if non-default themes offend you so much, why didn't you remove the -first- image in the article, which is a screenshot of Windows XP SP2 with the Classic theme, hm?  -/- Warren 03:41, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Just an observation: Aero Glass isn't even the default theme for Vista anyway.  If you install Vista on a PC with a graphics card that can be used with Aero Glass, it still defaults to Vista Standard.  You have to MANUALLY change it to Aero.  If you don't have a graphics card that is capable, Vista Basic is the default theme.  In any case, it doesn't matter what theme is in use in the screenshots, as long as the screenshot is illustrating the feature detailed in the article (and is consistent with other screenshots in the same article), then it's perfectly fine.Smoothy 22:16, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Windows Aero is the default theme in premium editions of Windows Vista if a compatible graphics card is installed. Themodernizer 20:58, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

message: The most recent edit to this page has no detail in the first paragraph.All it says is:was known as Internet Connection Firewal That isn't good spelling, nor did it have punctuation.Most Wikipedia Articles don't connect the title and the first paragraph.I will fix the non-detail things so it will be easier to edit in the future.
Qqwe2 (talk) 12:18, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Qqwe2 (talk), there is nothing wrong with this sentence. it reads perfectly fine as it is referring to a previously released name. Steve Lux, Jr. (talk) 21:30, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  No detail in first paragraph.
Talk:Curtiss F11C Goshawk

message: The image :Image:XBFC-1.jpg has been deleted per category for speedy deletion, criteria I4. The image may be freely uploaded again if a source and correct copyright tag are given, and a fair use rationale (if appropriate). KiloT 18:49, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image deletion as of 8th August

message: I moved to some articles between pages of F11C and BF2C, so they are more concentrating to each model now.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shodan99 (talk • contribs) 09:30, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moving of articles 

message: Dear Wikipedians, I'm confused... if the BF2C Goshawk is merely a more advanced version of the F11C Goshawk, why have 2 different wikiarticles? Shouldn't they be merged into this one? IMHO, it's like having different articles for the Bf 109 A to E and then F to K versions. Regards, DPdH (talk) 15:30, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why having separate articles for F11C and BF2C? 
Talk:To Be a Pilgrim

message: Re the not notable tag placed on this article. This hymn is one of the most notable hymns there is. The author and the book it is from are both greatly notable. IMO the tag should be removed ASAP. -- SGBailey 22:37, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I added the tag because the text of the article is pretty sparse, and the article should not consist solely of the text (see WP:L&P). If it is so notable (it might be more popular in some circles than others), there should be more to say about it. Compare, for instance, "Rock of Ages," "When_I_Survey_the_Wondrous_Cross," and "O for a Thousand Tongues to Sing." --Flex 02:15, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I know I'm a bit late to this, but I just thought I'd say that this hymn isn't unsung.  It's pretty well known in Scotland (I think I've been at services at three different Church of Scotland congregations where this has been sung, and I'm pretty sure it's in the most resent edition of the Church Hymnary).  - Duncan Sneddon  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 163.1.180.65 (talk) 00:26, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Not notable

message: The comment about the song's use in Keeping Up Appearances says it was 'fall 1990'. The use of 'fall' is curious for a couple of reasons - firstly it's a strikingly American word to use when describing a British song and TV show, and secondly it's the only mention of a season at all.  The other cultural examples either get a month and year, or just a year 80.0.226.7 (talk) 11:56, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fall 

message: The BBC Radio drama "Pilgrim" takes many episode titles from this hymn, especially in the first series.
It plays a striking role in the Dr Who episode "The Family of Blood" 
--Stevelinton (talk) 14:38, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some More Uses/Reference
Talk:Dawson Turner

message: Ok, this edit by the IP-hopping anon who has been disrupting the article actually included something like a coherent explanation instead of temper tantrums and impotent legal threats.
I found the book he was talking about, and the photo in this article appears to be Thomas Turner.
However, this other source (also available here and in color here and alternate color here) by Gratz identifies the photo as Dawson Turner.
The source identifying the picture as Thomas Turner was published 1840 by Thomas Turner.  The source identifying the picture as Dawson Turner was published in 1920 with no connection to Turner beyond describing his autograph collection.
Either:
*Thomas Turner's publishers never met him despite being hired to publish a book "for private distribution only" with no credit to themselves, somehow had Dawson Turner's picture, and (despite the rest of their good work) either lazily or mistakenly decided that one good Turner deserves another, and neither men complained after. (At least four assumptions).
*Gratz made a mistake well after both men were dead. (One assumption).
I believe the latter scenario requires fewer assumptions and so seems more likely.
Ian.thomson (talk) 19:38, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I would remove the picture, but I don't want to reward the IP until he at least acknowledges that there's other ways to do things besides vandalize the article. Ian.thomson (talk) 20:49, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, blocked their current IP address since it's clear they're just gonna be a pig-headed child.  Removed the pic for the reasons I've given above. Ian.thomson (talk) 22:46, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doing this the proper way since Anon won't