Talk:Plesk

message: I would like to know the possible meanings ..  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.92.10.3 (talk) 09:27, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plesk etymology? 

message: The article on Plesk seems to be (indirectly) advertising the SWsoft company and its products. Please make changes and consider revising the article. Teckie 02:34, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: The article is factual and unbiased.  Had there been / if there is a page for cPanel, it'd probably read similarly.  I work for a company that resells Plesk, and not one word of it that I have read is untrue or undiscoverable by researching elsewhere via Google.  In fact, although I am not the original author, I cannot think of any changes that will still convey a truthful description of Plesk.  You write, "Please make changes," but then fail to offer ideas as to how to change it yourself.  Remember this is a WIKI, and anyone can change anything at anytime.
----
The bit about programming remotely is somewhat off-topic, but the article looks fine. What's not NPOV about it? One-dimensional Tangent (Talk) 00:19, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: This article badly lacks standards.
* An introductory sentence should read like "Plesk is the name of a computer program/software used in the internet industry"
* NPOV: XXX is something by YYY clearly is advertisement for YYY (that it is by YYY does not contribute to the meaning of XXX)
* NPOV: The text reads pretty much like copy and paste from sales literature (which normally doesn't present falsehoods (so is factual) but usually doesn't point out weaknesses, leaves much room for interpretation (how many thousands?, what exactly means 'manage'?, where is a link to the user's manual?) and thereby tends to support fallacies). NPOV is not the same as factual (or would anyone agree that "Sahara is one of the few places on earth where rain won't spoil holidays" is NPOV?)
* Relevance: why is XXX worth to be distinguished from web hosting automation solutions in general.
* Language/Style: The language used appears to address neither expert (no truly technical details are exposed) nor layperson (none of the technical terms is explained/paraphrased).
** To your first two points, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows uses the same intro, so it seems fine to me.
** Relevance: all the big 5 web control panels have wiki articles, Plesk is used a lot.
** Language: Why would their be any technical details, this is an encyclopedia not a technical manual.
199.212.8.26 (talk) 19:57, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  NOT NPOV, Bad Style 

message: I would say this is still a stub... should a stub template be added? Tim 06:25, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub?

message: "The company behind Plesk, SWsoft, operates principally from Herndon, Virginia."
As far as I know, SWsoft is based in Russia. --Daniel15 (Talk/Contribs) 09:15, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  SWsoft is Russian 

message: Hey there, I'd like a chance to rewrite this article.  Please do not delete.  TruckMonkey (talk) 21:29, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speedy Deletion Contested 

message: I am very annoyed. Sometimes when I try to go on the website known as Holby.tv, the following message appears:
This is the Plesk™ default page 
If you see this page it means:
1) hosting for this domain is not configured
or
2) there's no such domain registered in Plesk. 
For more information please contact Administrator. 
However, the administrator's email address is none@example.com. It seems to me as if Plesk are nothing but a group of cyber-surfers blocking interesting sites for no reason whatsoever. Will someone please tell me why this is?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by George.millman (talk • contribs) 10:41, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  holby.tv 

message: There should be a classification of competing software into proprietary and open source (/ free).  E.g of the latter is OpenPanel.  
It might also be better to change the title to 'Alternative software' instead of 'Competing software  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.182.64.227 (talk) 08:09, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Competing software - Proprietary vs. Open source alternatives 

message: Can someone clarify? It seems like this is WP:REFSPAM but I'd like some assistance to remove the offending parts if possible.
OriginalKratos (talk) 18:39, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like this concern was dealt with some time ago, quite soon after the templating. I cannot see how it is currently an issue so I am removing the template. 82.34.155.8 (talk) 17:04, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  not sure why this is marked with Template:Advert