lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of film noir titles

message: Please link all films listed; if they're notable enough to be on a Wikipedia list, then they're notable enough to deserve an article. Redlinks are not scarlet letters - they're signposts pointing where articles should be. Girolamo Savonarola 23:04, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Linkage 

message: Further up there was already a complaint that this list contains too much personal opinion and not enough sources. And indeed the list contains thing where the film noir connection seems pretty far fetched, like southern gothic vampire story true blood. To avoid that this gets totally out of hand, I'd suggest that aside from very obvious noir examples (=everybody intuitively agrees they are noir) entries needs to be sourced, i.e. there needs to be some (reputable) review/article/paper/book that actually calls the concerned film noir. The current entries should reviewed under that aspect and removed if necessary.--Kmhkmh (talk) 22:58, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's noir and what is not and sources

message: Maximilianklein (talk) 23:28, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: WorldCat Genres

message: In my opinion, the only way to salvage this trash-bag of a list article is to require every film listed to have a footnote of its own, linking to a checkable WP:RS that states it is a film noir. (For example, the way that items in articles such as List of atheists in music do.) All non-footnoted films in the article are therefore open to being deleted. By the way, any film listed in this article should also bear the category :Category:Film noir or :Category:Neo-noir. If they don't, then remove them from this article. Softlavender (talk) 11:22, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It may be a trash-bag of an article, but it's still an invaluable resource. Wikipedia's list of noir has become my go-to source for neo-noir discussions.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.238.184.48 (talk) 02:39, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

text: All the obvious trash has been removed and the vast majority of the remaining films now feature footnotes with reliable sources. Therefore I've removed the disputed tag.--Croscher (talk) 07:33, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, thanks very much Luigibob and Croscher for salvaging what six months ago was a hopeless mess. Softlavender (talk) 08:07, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

text: Thanks from me as well, this was a much need overhaul & improvement.--Kmhkmh (talk) 15:44, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Highly inaccurate and subjective article
Talk:Vanessa Bryant

message: Bryant was recognized by her supporters for challenging the National Basketball Association culture of tolerance of tomcatting. It was my view that this makes her relevant to the NBA Wikiproject. An aim of that project is to "Create and improve articles whose content is connected to the National Basketball Association organization." I'm curious of your thoughts. TJMSmith (talk) 14:19, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I originally  thought it was added due to her relationship with an NBA player. I am not too familiar with her cultural impact on the league. Unfortunately, the cited source doesn't provide more depth either. If you still feel strongly about her relevance to the project, feel free to get others' opinions at WT:NBA. Regards.—Bagumba (talk) 14:53, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bryant NBA Wikiproject
Talk:PureBasic

message: A bit of a game of "find PureBasic mentioned print" was played in an effort to save it from deletion.  Now that the AFD is closed and the article is being kept, those references need to be cleaned.  The books mentioned are fine but they would be better used as citations for material in the article.  That would also help with the other big problem, the over use of the manufacturer's website as a reference.  Anyone want to help with this cleanup?--RadioFan (talk) 11:49, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah I will try to work on the cleanup. (Especially since I was the one that overused the manufacturer's website, I didn't realize that was bad form, whoops!) --Travis.m.granvold (talk) 12:38, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

text: It wasn't a game of "find it in print" at all. It's just that we never knew about the notability requirements and thus never cited anything from print or publication. As for finding such notability, it took me less than 10 minutes of web searching. Anyway, all's well that ends well. @RadioFan: I'm sorry for the harsh tone I took with you. You also asked: "what magazine" and "what newspaper" for my cites. I have put them in the description: The Manly Daily for the newspaper article, and the magazine should be obvious in itself, since it's a covershot. That speaks for itself, and needs nothing to back it up. One last thing: how do we send private messages with Wikipedia to each other, as you've been doing to me? I don't know how to reply or contact you. WPWatcher (talk) 12:50, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Removal of the "Programming 2D Scrolling Games" book is unwarranted... you seem to think it was never published. Here are 3 web pages that prove its existence: (1) http://socoder.net/?topic=520 has people offering it for sale, (2) http://forums.purebasic.com/english/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=41122 is discussion of the book, including details and a photo, and (3) http://web.archive.org/web/20071218150136/http://www.shareit.com/product.html?productid=300023962 had the book for sale for a time. WPWatcher (talk) 17:25, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Is this a self published book?  It's mentioned on the forums (as you have mentioned above in the first 2 links above) and a no-longer-active sales site.  However I'm having difficulty finding the book by the ISBN.  WorldCat, Amazon, and Google Books have no record of a book by that ISBN number or title. A Google web search on the title brings up some additional forums.  Unfortunately the forum discussions dont help establish existence of this book only speculation about it.--RadioFan (talk) 18:53, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  books articles and references 

message: The article states 'PureBasic has a unique "lifetime license model"' but it's not "unique"; BBC BASIC for Windows has (and has always had) the same model: a purchase entitles you to lifetime updates. RichardRussell (talk) 09:12, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Licensing model
Talk:Happy hardcore

message: Have attempted to kick off a re-write of this, as frankly the whole thing was a mess. I've redirected both 4-beat and UK hardcore for now to this as both of those articles were even less sourced than Happy hardcore and mostly just had the same bits of content duplicated.
I've tried to write some UK lineage for this, as that's my knowledge area (at least until about 1998), and bits of the Euro new beat and Hardcore techno era. A link into the much better and sourced bouncy techno article needs adding also.
I'd be really grateful for those with knowledge of the Belgian, German, and Dutch hardcore scenes to add some history too - the omission is in no way on purpose! With some reasonably sourced narrative, hopefully this article may find some new life! Altlondon (talk) 21:43, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Small re-write

message: No mention of SEA and Oceania scene. Biggest name I can think of is S3rl. Should be something on both regions' scenes. 2600:6C8A:B740:C:79D8:FCC6:2C81:DEC0 (talk) 05:39, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Post-2000 History 

message: The introduction contains the sentence "The thing that makes happy hardcore stand apart from happy gabba, is that happy hardcore tends to have breakbeats running alongside the 4/4 kick drum.".
Nowhere in the page is "happy gabba" linked or explained. The sentence is actually associated with a citation, but I'm a little suspicious since a Google search for "happy gabba" returns no relevant results (other than this page itself). 135.0.34.7 (talk) 15:52, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added a wikilink to Gabber, which is the alternate spelling. ResonantDistortion 16:31, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is happy gabba?
Talk:Stationery

message: A large amount of the content of this article confuses the general term stationery---which covers everything from cheap paper for using in inkjet printers, to velum or other unusual papers with personalised letterheads, and from the cheapest bic pen to fountain pens costing many thousands of dollars---with the more specific meaning of fancy or customised paper products usually used for invitations, thank you cards, etc. The article should be rewritten to mark this distinction. It might even make sense to separate out the second topic into its own article on "customised stationery" or something similar.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.21.160.94 (talk) 03:30, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stationery vs Fancy/Customised Stationery
Talk:Henry Stafford, 2nd Duke of Buckingham

message: The link to Henry's mother is incorrect.  It links to another Margaret that is in fact not his mother, but another Margaret Beaufort.  Hrichter 08:04, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This has been corrected. History Lunatic (talk) 07:00, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong link 

message: The link in the ancestry table to Anne Neville is also incorrect - the link  is to the Anne Neville mentioned in the text as the wife of Richard III - the Anne Neville in the tanle is a relative of this Queen and does not have a page.  Great Article though.
:This has been corrected. Anne Neville, Countess of Stafford, now has a page. Cheers. History Lunatic (talk) 07:02, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another Wrong Link  

message: If you're going to have this list either take out Eleanor Beauchamp or change the title completely. It's actually not needed because he has a chart at the bottom of the page, people can see for themselves. -- Lady Meg (talk) 19:44, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Descendants of Edward III

message: Buckingham is also one of the primary suspects in the disappearance... of the Princes in the Tower.
:What was his part in the plot? Valetude (talk) 18:24, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The theory is explained later in this article under the heading The Princes in The Tower. History Lunatic (talk) 07:13, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Princes in the Tower 

message: Reference 9 contains a mispelling, In "(Codice 443 da Coleccao Pombalina da B.N.L.)", "Coleccao" should be spelled "Colecção."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pascalulu88 (talk • contribs) 14:34, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Corrected by another editor. Wire723 (talk) 10:29, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misspelling 

message: In his book The Wars of the Roses, Dan Jones mentions a headless skeleton discovered at the site said to be that of Buckingham's execution and that when touched, the bones immediately turned to dust. As to when this happened, Jones says only that it was "many centuries later." It seems to me like that might be worth mentioning if someone can find some sources. Beetfarm Louie (talk) 10:30, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Skeleton
Talk:Mist

message: Somebody create a Radiohead webcast page.  Why am I directed here when I type "scotch mist"?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.108.34.110 (talk) 06:28, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scotch Mist 

message: Please expound on this: "Strong superstitious and religious connotations are associated with mist in some cultures." by citing examples. Anyway, what are those. -Pika ten10 (talk) 08:33, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Be specific... 

message: For a stub, this article is heavy with images. I'm aware that two of them are featured pictures, but they don't seem to illustrate the topic well unless enlarged to a size that's very ungainly for such a short article. Commons:Category:Mist has quite a few very nice images, I think we should pick two examples for the article — one showing a mist over land and one showing a mist over water. Disclaimer: I just uploaded an image which I thought would be a nice example of a mist over water, but there's obviously no room for it right now in the article. —Elipongo (Talk contribs) 10:29, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 

message: I read Percy Jackson, and Mist is described as something that mortals can't see through if something freaky happens that they aren't allowed to see. Maybe somebody can get a chapter about that... Hermes13 (talk) 19:13, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mist isn't always weather mist.. 

message: The main picture of the article is slightly misleading as it is "heavier" than mist there. Visibility would be clearly less than a km in that environment.--Abuk SABUK (talk) 19:24, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  main picture 

message: Hi 117.99.217.187 (talk) 14:22, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Haga 

message: Mon soon matter and view pictures 2409:408C:4EB3:2A87:0:0:3CC9:270E (talk) 12:51, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:   Mon soon matter and view pictures
Talk:Strähle construction

message: Does anyone know what happened to the image that used to be on this page? BrianTung 05:50, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: 10:27, 10 December 2005 JesseW (talk | contribs | block) deleted "File:Strahle-construction.png" ‎ (WP:CSD Image #4 - "Images in category "Images with unknown source" or "Images with unknown copyright status"which have been on the site for more than 7 days, regardless of when uploaded.") Hyacinth (talk) 22:56, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: The text of this article correctly gives Stråhle's name with a raised-ring diacritic on the "a".  But the title of the article, and hence also its URL, repeats a longstanding error by spelling it "Strähle", with an umlaut.  As the article explains, someone in the mid-1700s, perhaps in translating from Swedish to German, mistakenly converted the raised ring into a tiny raised "e", which was how umlauts were then written.  That misspelling appeared in Marpurg's authoritative essay on temperaments in 1776, with the result many people since have misspelled Stråhle's name with an umlaut, nowadays typically written, in the modern style, as two dots.  
The recent mathematical literature about Stråhle's construction has, sad to say, repeated the umlaut misspelling.  But can't we finally start to fix that error?  I am writing an article about Stråhle's construction that I hope to publish in a mathematical journal, and I would like to point to this fine Wikipedia article from my article.  As things now stand, I will have to repeat the misspelling in order to give my reference!
LyleRamshaw (talk) 15:15, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  diacritic on Strahle's name in the title
Talk:SCO Group

message: I removed the following from the Top Section because it's trivia. I'm leaving it here so if there was significant impact from this event, the info and links could be incorporated.
:In , their website, www.sco.com, was attacked by the Mydoom computer virus, which took down the website for 2 weeks using a DDoS attack.
--Atkinson (talk) 00:37, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: This has been mentioned in the article body (with a different cite) but not the lede.  Wasted Time R (talk) 11:52, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed Trivia 
Talk:Tractor

message: I'm looking at starting new project, possibly life long, as I explore the origins and variations of tractors globally.
I plan to begin my research and documentation here...
https://tractorsandtables.com/
HOWEVER given what I'll be exploring, I wanted to share with those here that manage, care, and maintain this article.  hEKKIDNEUIFEWH EWHRF EWFYHREWBF EWYHFBEW HF UEF EHW FUJEW±−××××92.178.197.10 (talk) 18:59, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interest and research support 

message: Types of tractor 2409:4053:2093:E625:99D2:D2A4:644:CABE (talk) 03:56, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Farm machinery 

message: Image Nr. 3 on the page describes a "XTZ-243K" tractor. This is a typo, it is supposed to say "KhTZ-243K".
Since the page is semi-protected I am not able to edit it. IlyaTorshov (talk) 22:45, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typo on image Nr. 3 

message: "The truly portable engine was invented in 1893 by William Tuxford of Boston, Lincolnshire who started manufacture of an engine built around a locomotive-style boiler with horizontal smoke tubes."
Please change this to 1839. ErastVanDoren (talk) 22:03, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong date 

message: science for my child 69.55.112.149 (talk) 21:47, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  what is inside of a tractor wheel
Talk:May 68

message: Sous les pavés, la plage!
-Under the paving stones, the beach!
-Beneath the pavement, the beach!
-Under the paving stones you'll find sand!
-Under the paving stones, the clear path to the beach!
Which is the best non litteral translation?
Say in the article, it's the Parisian pavement of the streets, and the pavement stones were put out of the pavement and used as weapons by rioters.  
And they have been removed since this time, and replaced by concrete pavement to avoid this.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.91.248.85 (talk) 08:37, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slogan of "Mai 68" translated 

message: Just browsing here from another article, is there any reason why the flags of the different sides have a different shade of blue? This hasn't been mentioned in the archive. I don't know if there was any difference between the two, and if there was, it's hardly as distinct as the flags of the two ideological sides in 20th-century Spain, or the two sides in modern Belarus. Unknown Temptation (talk) 19:27, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flags 

message: At present the article presents the workers as universally opposed to union leadership, which is obviously completely absurd for such a large group. It also contains fairly biased language like "the mainstream unions that were more willing to compromise with the government than enact the will of the base" and "underscoring a disconnect in organizations that claimed to reflect working class interests".
I am also concerned about the use of highly biased primary sources like the Situationist International. Eldomtom2 (talk) 17:59, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV of "Worker strikes" section
Talk:Risk-aware consensual kink

message: There are so many WJDI on this page that it is impossible for the unkinked reader to comprehend.
Patrick0Moran 05:02, 4 Sep 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you resolve the abbreviation "WJDI", as well as the abbreviations "EJDU" and "DJEM" in your cryptic edit comment? I really can't figure out what they might refer to. --Florian Blaschke (talk) 16:36, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: New section

message: I can't really check at work, but do the two links go to the same text or two different texts with the same title? ♥ «Charles A. L.» 14:42, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm home, I just checked. Two different texts. Heaven knows what autocomplete is now going to show my stepdaughter.–♥ «Charles A. L.» 01:55, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links 

message: There isn't a solid reference to PRICK here; one of the citations goes to a dead page/porn ad parking lot domain. Is  usable as a Wiki reference? I don't know if Kinkly is considered authoritative. I'd never heard of it until today.
: Dead links fixed, with archive url and other archive-* data --Thnidu (talk) 17:14, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Added this citation for PRICK. I don't know about Kinkly either, but I'm not in the scene and wouldn't expect to. --Thnidu (talk) 17:47, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead links
Talk:ILBM

message: The wording in this article implies that EHB works on both OCS and ECS.  IIRC, the A1000 (only OCS computer I used) can't do EHB.  Can anyone confirm? TheAmigo42 07:04, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, first revisions of OCS in A1000 don´t support EHB. There are OCS based models supporting EHB (even later A1000 revisions).Pavlor (talk) 08:40, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
Talk:John H. Overton

message: Hello,
In the third to last paragraph of the career page, it is asserted that Broussard would have voted with the Conservative Coalition (presumably had he still lived, since he died in 1934). There is a citation needed marking, and I believe that unless any sources can be found, that line should be removed as it seems Broussard was relatively progressive; even leaving the Democratic Party from 1914-1916to support Theodore Roosevelt's Progressive party.
Best -- BattlePig101 (talk) 04:28, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mention of Senator Broussard
Talk:Danica McKellar

message: I removed text stating that McKellar has a PhD from Chicago. The cite used is pretty clearly based on Wikipedia, so I think it's a case of citogenesis. McKellar's own websites https://mckellarmath.com/about/ and http://www.danicamckellar.com/about/ only mention her UCLA degree. Ylee (talk) 19:33, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: This edit reintroduced the claim. Please discuss. -- UKoch (talk) 16:09, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I suspect the claim is due to a misreading of this article in which it's said that "The other member of the math proof team did continue in math. Ms. Winn, now Dr. Winn, completed her Ph.D. in mathematics at the University of Chicago[...]" pgbrown (talk)  16:47, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: That makes some sense. It has been corrected now, so all is well. -- UKoch (talk) 16:45, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed Chicago PhD claim
Talk:List of chordate orders

message: A list of all classes, not orders, in Archaea, Bacteria, and Eukaryota might be more manageable.  Should we just change the name of this article of "List of chordate orders"? Arkuat 23:58, 2004 Jul 22 (UTC)
See Wikipedia:WikiProject Tree of Life. Arkuat 03:23, 2004 Jul 23 (UTC)
OK, so now it has expanded to a "List of animal orders" and has yet to branch out to even cover the Eukaryota. --Arkuat 05:54, 2005 Jun 21 (UTC)
This list had sat here for over a year with no information about non-chordates (except a link to Insect) on it.  Order-level is too ambitious for a single article listing all such taxa; a comprehensive list of all classes would still be very long. For a list of phyla and selected classes, see User:Arkuat/Taxonomy. --Eric Forste (talk) 05:31, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: classes

message: I found the alphabetical order of classes disorienting; many people will be used to classificatory tables that give useful phylogenetic information. Should the list be arranged in branching order instead (or at least organised into subphyla)?
And how far do you concede to cladistics? The four tetrapod classes are SO antediluvian. Apparently the fishes have been split along cladistic lines, so shouldn't the avian orders be put into Reptilia on the same basis? Or the tetrapod, lungfish and coelacanth orders be merged under Class Sarcopterygii (fleshy-limbed vertebrates)?
And surely the agnathan orders need to be arranged into more than one class? - where are the hagfishes? I think I'd better insert them at class level before anyone puts them in with the lampreys.
Hope this isn't too negative. Just a few questions from an interested amateur with constructive intent. :) Gnostrat 21:30, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: another comment

message: I am hoping to add the dinosaurs to this list. I have a question, though. How can Archosaurs be a subcategory of reptiles if they include birds when reptiles exclude birds. Hoping somebody can help me out here especially as this conundrum in a number of wikipedia articles so it would be good to resolve this uestion, either here or through some offsite sources. ♫ SqueakBox talk contribs 04:58, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Reptiles, birds and dinosaurs

message: Why do Acipenseriformes are listed twice? I mean among Cladistia and again among Chondrostei.
178.235.146.101 (talk) 20:31, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Acipenseriformes 

message: There seems to be a glaring lack of extinct tetrapod groups.
178.235.146.101 (talk) 20:31, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tetrapods