lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Light aircraft

message: First light aircraft were constructed and built in 1918/1919 by German engineer Hanns Klemm
* Zeitreise-bb.de: Hanns Klemm, Der Schöpfer des Leichtflugzeuges (German)--Maroklok (talk) 19:29, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I see that the ref you have cited claims that, but it is a ludicrous claim. What did the Wrights fly in 1903 if it wasn't a light aircraft? The whole of WWI was fought with light aircraft as they were almost all under 12,500 lbs. - Ahunt (talk) 20:08, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: One editor has been edit warring to include the Aero East Europe Sila on the list. I propose it be removed as a very obscure example of a light aircraft, not even close to the other examples given in prominence. - Ahunt (talk) 22:07, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: No - although arguably we should just delete the list completely as it can never be anything other than an arbitrary selection.Nigel Ish (talk) 22:50, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd agree with that. this kind of article does not usually have such a list. Enough suitable examples should be mentioned in the main text - a few firsts, famous examples, that sort of thing. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 09:10, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I support just deleting the list to avoid any more "fan additions". An admin has gone ahead and removed the list from the article citing this discussion, so unless anyone has anything more to add, I think we can just go ahead and close this as a "consensus to delete the list". - Ahunt (talk) 12:46, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Does [[Aero East Europe Sila]] belong on the list?

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :🛩. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 19#🛩 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.   -- Tamzin (she/they) | o toki tawa mi. 10:34, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "🛩" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Foja Mountains

message: The current correct spelling, even in Bahasa Indonesia, is "Foya". The Foja spelling dates to the Dutch era, since in Dutch j is pronounced y. But in the Perfected Spelling System reform of 1972, among other changes, "dj" became "j" and "j" became "y". Thus the "Foja" spelling is obsolete. The article needs updating, including titles. Ptilinopus (talk) 00:30, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling
Talk:Stuyvesant Fish

message: Instead of an anonymously added "Mrs Fish was noted for her caustic comments on American social mores", may we have some reported remarks, with citations? The only one I know was reported decades later by the novelist Elinor Glyn: it sounds to me too fabricated, or I'd add it myself.--Wetman (talk) 00:03, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Mrs Fish's commentary
Talk:Dartmouth Ultimate Team

message: This article was created fairly recently, so I figure discussion might actually occur on this page. There are a number of articles about individual Dartmouth athletic teams that have been scattered about, most of which haven't been usefully updated since soon after they were first created. There's already an article Dartmouth College athletic teams which only has one team actually in it. Due to the frequency of new Dartmouth-related articles being created, it's in the past been suggested and implemented to merge them into one article. Dartmouth College student groups, Dartmouth College Greek organizations, Dartmouth College residential communities, etc. Note other articles that I've so far put merge proposals on (and I'm still trying to hunt more of them down - most aren't categorized or anything) include Dartmouth College Men's Varsity Swim Team and Dartmouth Rugby Football Club. I know there are some exceptions to this merging idea (some of which I've fought for the exceptions myself), but it's worth a proposal/debate. Individual articles definitely need to be well-written and maintained. --└ Smith120bh/TALK ┐ 00:56, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal
Talk:Fort Knox

message: I'm not allowing lazy cut and paste jobs into this article.  Period.  Do your own writing! Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 06:38, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Lazy cut and paste jobs

message: Hello wikipedians, I have found out that a digital photo showing a mannequin in a tank labeled as it being taken in the 1940s. Note the unusally high quality. I personally think that it was a photo showing what was described, but it was not able to be used under creative commons liscensces. Please change, Thank you for your time. 98.181.69.7 (talk) 13:37, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Typically, federal government images can be used in articles as much as CC-licensed ones, as they are considered public domain. Also, high-quality color photographs could be made in the 1940s, although it was expensive and the process was slow. As you may well know, the U.S. military easily had the resources to have photos like this made. On top of that, I don't see any images in this article with a mannequin, unless you are mistaking a human being for one. Stefen Towers among the rest! Gab • Gruntwerk 18:14, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Digital photo featuring mannequin labeled as photo from the 1940s
Talk:Deathpool

message: Does anyone object to a merger of this article into Dead pool?  If not, I will merge soon.  TMS63112 01:04, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Far from object I think it is the obvious choice. Do it anytime - no one will object I'm sure. --DV8 2XL 02:49, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Panini Comics

message: The forum whilst (possibly) deserving of a mention I do not feeldeserves such a detail analysis and detail and have edited the article accordingly, because it's not that much to do with Panini Comics themselves though if someone wants to make a Panini Comics Forum Page go ahead.  If you disagree and can explain why feel free to. Stupid Ape 09:30, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems to me they should be merged.  In the meantime I added a link. --Galaxiaad 16:59, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Forum

message: Looking at things like Fantastic Four Adventures, it strikes me those reprints might be better going in a new "Panini Comics titles" (probably under a "Panini Comics" one which would have :Category:Marvel UK as a child, following the general convention with similar circumstances) but I may be overlooking something so I thought I'd float it here first. (Emperor (talk) 01:04, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Category

message: Since Panini Comics publish in a wide range of countries, shouldn't this page refer to all of their publications in every country? I was looking for informations on the company business in Brazil that I know to have different deals with reprinting Marvel and DC comics, plus deals with local producers, in fact, judging from this article Panini Comics Brazil seems to have a much larger number of publications than the U.K. version. It probably has reference to it in the portuguese language version, but that should be available for english readers too.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kosmonauta (talk • contribs) 07:20, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: International=
Talk:First Nagorno-Karabakh War

message: Rendering of citation To the following citation:  Table of conflict locations with at least one major armed conflict in 1993
I have been able to have the citation render by changing "sfn" to "harvnb" where it didn't render at all before (see citation 14 here). It now renders as follows:
:"SIPRI Yearbook 1994". sipri.org. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. 1994. p. 88. Archived from the original (PDF) on 26 August 2020.Chorbajian Donabedian Mutafian 1994, pp. 13–18 Table of conflict locations with at least one major armed conflict in 1993. [italics added for emphasis]
I'm not certain, but I don't think that the italicised text is actually necessary or even if it refers to the second source but the first source that does contain a table.  I can't actually see the pages linked in the second source.  Unless there is good reason not to, it would be better to split this combined citation into two - loosing the italicised text. Just checking first. Cinderella157 (talk) 04:06, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Break 1

message: suggest adding link NKR 2A02:1812:1126:5D00:8403:95E1:2C28:96EC (talk) 08:54, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: NKR abbreviation is not defined at its first occurrence
Talk:Joe Byrd (Cherokee Nation Principal Chief)/Archive 1

message: Bumpus, we need to start running down links with court filings for Joe Byrd.  I leave it in your capable hands to get started.  Have fun. Waya sahoni 08:09, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links Needed 

message: This article needs to be scrubbed for neutrality based upon recommdations from the editors.  I provided a lot of content, and I have a great dislike for Byrd based on his conduct (and understandbly so).  Please review and scrub for NPOV.  Waya sahoni 08:40, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: User:Bookofsecrets has provided external links verifying content. Waya sahoni 09:37, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: References should be cited inline. — Scm83x talk  09:48, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality Check Needed, Editors Requested 

message: I have put inline cite links throughout the article.  So I believe it has been wikified.  --Bookofsecrets 03:01, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Awesome job brother.  I have the photos of Byrd's goons beating up citizens, boarding up the courthouse.  Marching around with machine guns and sawed off shotguns, SWAT teams and National Guard and BIA helicopters patrolling tribal lands during Byrd's standoff with the Feds, etc.  I have about twenty choice pitures.  I guess we should upload them and see how many RebelGuys2 let's us post in the article. Waya sahoni 05:27, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

text: Wa-do brother.  We can give it a shot.  Are all the rights to the photo's you have clear to be posted?  If there is any doubt they will delete them or so it seems.  Also I'm going to delete the picture on the article simply due to the up from deletion situation.  --Bookofsecrets 11:45, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Wikified
Talk:Dog Faced Hermans

message: They also had a Peel Session, but I'm not sure if it was released. Nonplus 01:20, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Now mentioned, still not officially released, but YouTubable nonetheless.  Morganfitzp (talk) 21:09, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peel Session 

message: What is the relationship with these bands? thanks, --Cacuija (my talk) 09:03, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A member of Chumbawamba roadied for the Hermans and was instrumental in the group meeting The Ex. The only link that I can find with Submission Hold is that the bands sound alike at times and may have played some shows together.  Morganfitzp (talk) 21:09, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Submission Hold and Chumbawamba
Talk:Sapphirine

message: can anyone add some pictures regarding this !!!!!! 105.96.233.140 (talk) 12:10, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not clear what you are requesting. What do LPA and LPNA refer to? --Kent G. Budge (talk) 18:04, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  saphirine en LPNA et LPA
Talk:Kharjah (component of muwashshah)

message: The merge seems like a good idea to me.  Maybe merge both into Muwashshah leaving redirects?  Dlyons493 Talk  01:23, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that merging the article would be a terrible error. The Jarchas are not only the end of arab and jew Muwashshah, but also, and mainly, the first expression of lyric literature in primitive Spanish language. The had autonomous life, and weren't written by the same authors of the Muwashshah. This authors only compiled what they heard to mozarabs. Their charming siplicity and popular spirit have nothing to do with the erudit and rigid Muwashshah although they were written one after the other.--Garcilaso 20:12, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Merger with Muwashshah, suggested above, is a bad idea, I think. But the merger of Kharjah, Kharja and Jarcha is necessary: they are three spellings of the same word. I believe Kharja is the best form to choose. Jarcha is the Spanish spelling, not usually used in English, so would be my last choice. Andrew Dalby 15:08, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I find Andrew Dalby's suggestion reasonable. Jarcha could be a disambiguation page (the Kharja and the music group), and in the article a reference to Spanish spelling could be made.--Garcilaso 15:34, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I tried to do it by myself, but as another article with the name Kharja exists it needs to  be done by an administrator. I don´t know the proceedings--Garcilaso 14:07, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Lists of common misspellings/A

message: "Algebraical" is a real (although uncommon) word that is not misspelled. I think the difference between "algebraic" and "algebraical" is similar to that of "historic" and "historical." Ardric47 01:25, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you are right, I have made the change. Gaius Cornelius 00:54, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

text: They are listed as variants, which is why they don't have search links. Mild Bill Hiccup (talk) 02:35, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

message: (Discussion moved from A to main talk page Wikipedia talk:Lists of common misspellings#Mini-essay in response to spelling question). Milkunderwood (talk) 09:49, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: acquited > acquitted, annoint > anoint 

message: I am new to Wikipedia as editor. I started following this page so I could grab words in my free time to search for typos. If you get a word and remove found instances of the word, is common practice to put something like "Done 00:39, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it's not commmon practice to add signatures. You'll see from the history of the page that an editor began to do this in 2019, but after some discussion all the signatures were removed. But thank you for diving in and fixing some spellings! -- John of Reading (talk) 07:54, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for providing that clarification. I look forward to aiding in the efforts of the group. MrLavoie (talk) 23:14, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  After word has been checked
Talk:Stefan T. Vail Cooperative House

message: Is it unusual to have a building in Ann Arbor, Michigan, that was built in 1853? A rare historical landmark? What is the building's claim to notability?
The vanity stuff needs to go anyway... Weregerbil 01:29, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The early versions of the article documented three things: someone drawing people, a party, and a rotten egg in a basement. Those things have now been replaced with an article about the building. A blog is a great place for anecdotes about the rotten egg etc; an encyclopedia not so much. Weregerbil 04:29, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I added two third-party references to the work of Stefan T. Valavanis, one of them from the advertisement in Journal of Economic Literature (20 years after his death). It would be useful for others to locate more information on Vail, simply by searching JSTOR. Yours in cooperation, Kiefer.Wolfowitz (talk) 13:21, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stefan T. Valavanis (Vail)
Category talk:Greek gods

message: well im looking for some notes on the Greek Gods of  Pan,Echo,Narcissus.
um, as far as i remember, they're not gods, theyre nymphs. echo fell in love with pan, and umm...i dont remember wat else. i'm here wondering why artemis isnt here? Kr5t 02:02, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lustfaust

message: The article has now been completely rewritten to reflect Lustfaust's status as a notable hoax. Note that all the above comments refer to a previous version which described their career as fact. Iain99 14:24, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Complete Rewrite
Talk:Mark McGann

message: Vanity page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brainhell (talk • contribs) 
:Er. He's rather famous actually. This page hardly does him justice ATM. Jooler 00:30, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I run a website for Mark, Paul, Stephen and Joe McGann which has, for over a year, been an external link on their respective pages on wikipedia. The links were removed on 18th/19th January. I believe it is an appropriate link as it keeps interested parties updated on what the brothers are currently working on. I receive nothing for running this site and it contains no advertisements, it is purely an information site. I also update their wikipedia pages when I can. Please could you reinstate the link if possible. Micharris (talk) 17:53, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  mcgannbrothers website 

message: This article needs work on formatting and sourcing. Whereas I could do it myself, I am in the middle of a rather large category cleanup, so it might have to wait. But if anyone else feels liek taking it on, go ahead. Rodhullandemu 23:37, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tags
Talk:Shock response spectrum

message: This article is full of undefined jargon terms that make it unintelligible to the non-specialist reader. Can somebody please help sort it out?  I would atually like to know what a shock spectrum is!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.118.95.215 (talk) 23:04, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As an engineer I found this page to be quite helpful. The jargon used is unavoidable due to the nature of the subject. In order to fully understand SRS you must take a vibrations course which you can only understand after years of advanced math. Surely one article can’t be expected to do that for you. That said, I would like to hear more about how the graph that you end up getting is actually applied to a structure.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.171.248.34 (talk) 13:55, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Jargon

message: Equations would be nice!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mdrsparky (talk • contribs) 16:51, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Equations

message: This article is ridiculously poor. I am a professional vibrations engineer so I have dealt with the topic in some detail. This article lacks both accuracy and technical breadth. There are quite a few personal opinions listed on this page. For example, the comment on SRS not being a spectra ("Just because something is plotted against frequency..."). Though this article cites Harris/Piersol as a reference, it actually does not follow the content described there (Harris specifies exactly why it is a spectra). I recommend no one follow the content in any detail at the moment. 70.183.90.130 (talk) 20:31, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: At your suggestion, I just deleted the claim that SRS is not a spectrum. Thanks! If you have other specific suggestions please write them here, or fix them yourself if you prefer! (PS: I didn't write the article.) --Steve (talk) 15:07, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Inaccurate and incomplete
Talk:William Whewell

message: No really, it still needs IPA clean-up, unless "Hughell" is suddenly standard pronunciation. :-) JackyR 04:07, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  IPA 

message: I did some work to improve this article; can we remove the Wikify tag?  Granted, the article does still need work.  ProfessorPaul 22:28, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Remove the tag?

message: Removed a sentence about Maria Mitchell that was out of place, 
"Maria Mitchell, a visiting American astronomer,  was "riled" by Whewell's chauvinist teasing while dining at Trinity College high table (www.theguardian.com/science/2010/nov/21/royal-society-lost-women-scientists)." 
I'm sure Whewell was being chauvinist, but without other examples this addition is simply inappropriate. Larsobrien  21:48, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Chauvinism

message: Under "Life and Career" the article states, "In 1814 he was awarded the Chancellor's Gold Medal for poetry.[7] He was Second Wrangler in 1816..."
I don't know which date is wrong, but there has to be an error here, as these were both awards for students graduating with a bachelor of arts degree. In fact you were not allowed to compete for the Chancellor's Gold Medal unless you achieved a rank of senior optime or higher on the Tripos exam (which is how the Wranglers were determined). So it would have been impossible for him to win the Chancellor's Gold Medal before being named a wrangler.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.206.119.25 (talk) 14:00, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates Appear Wrong 

message: This article uses Info box officeholder template, while the article on his predecessor as master of Trinity college Christopher Wordsworth (divine) uses the more common info box person template. Infobox person seems easier to use, and include personal information like his marriages, as well as his many professional accomplishments. Just a thought.  I broke up the section on his life into several sections that I encounter more often in a biographical article. I kept text in chronological order, and used cite format for 3 references. - - Prairieplant (talk) 07:16, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why use the unusual infobox
Talk:Carter Stanley

message: Why would you remove "legendary"? It's not like it's controversial. That might not have the right ring, but there should be something that indicates the Stanleys were not just A bluegrass band, but one of the most influential of all time.
BZFGT
:Carter Stanley is not "legendary"; he was a historical person, not part of a legend. If you feel that the Stanley Brothers were one of the most influential bluegrass bands, put that in the article (be sure to cite someone). For example, membership  in the International Bluegrass Music Hall of Honor. Cmadler 02:38, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The photo is not of Carter Stanley. It is a photo of guitarist Chris Sharp, strangely identified in the promo photo as Jimmy Martin. 174.211.38.27 (talk) 02:40, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect Photo
Talk:Weyland-Yutani

message: Most of the info was lost during the redirect and is not duplicated elsewhere :( 174.118.241.49 (talk) 14:43, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Because most of the "info" was just unsourced plot regurgitation. --IllaZilla (talk) 18:28, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Why delete an entire article and not merge it somewhere?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.220.34.167 (talk) 01:23, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info lost
Talk:Cell phones and driving

message: I've tagged this with {npov} because, as the person who proposed it for deletion noted, it's not neutral. I don't know much about the topic, but I seem to recall that there is far from universal agreement that driving and cell-phone-chatting is dangerous, but the article doesn't give any indication of  that right now. Some discussion of measures taken to reduce the risk would be useful too - promotion of headsets and the like. (Also, this may not be the best title for the article - I'd suggest Cell phones and driving or similar) CDC (talk) 02:04, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Among cognitive psychologists and driving researchers there IS large agreement (although such agreement is never universal). Its only in the dumb-ass media that there is disagreement. I've added refs to new studies and I think the two articles should be merged. Since in the US they're called 'cells' and the UK they're called 'mobiles', how about the neutral 'phones and driving'? Famousdog 14:57, 23 January 2007 (UTC)