lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Atlantic University

message: The reference to a 1970's magazine publicity stunt has nothing to do with Atlantic University, the school.  This line item should be deleted.
The school is nationally accredited by the Distance Education and Training Council (DETC), an accrediting agency recognized by the U.S. Department of Education.
Atlantic University is nationally accredited by the Distance Education and Training Council (DETC), an accrediting agency recognized by the U.S. Department of Education.
(Not an unaccredited institution of higher learning)
:It is "unaccredited" in the sense that it is not regionally accredited (which is what "accreditation" in the USA normally refers to). "National" accreditation, e.g. from the DETC, is not nearly as good--it applies mainly to trade schools and correspondence programs. --Dawud  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.60.63.118 (talk) 13:59, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have added a Conflict of Interest tag to the article due to apparent repeated COI (WP:COI) editing by one particular editor. Afterwriting (talk) 23:48, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict of Interest editing
Talk:Convair X-6

message: What was the thrust of the X40?  Trekphiler 00:29, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: X40

message: Who knows the final disposition of the NB-36 scrap (after Texas)? Nevada? Idaho? 143.232.210.150 (talk) 23:47, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Final Disposition of nuclear scrap (NB-36)
Talk:Chester, New Hampshire

message: Hey, how come Timothy Dexter isn't on the list of famous residents?  He's probably the MOST famous resident, I think, in this backwater town.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Seanpatnaude (talk • contribs) 19:46, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Technichally, he wasn't a resident of the town. He owned land, yes, but I can't find any information about him actually living there.:Ishdarian (talk) 11:16, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timothy Dexter 
Talk:Hormel Foods

message: It seems a little fishy that there is no item on the "regular" talk page at all: it's all been archived in the past few months, with nothing left here.  I was going to note that the article itself seems to have a lot of promotional language (with some exceptions), but this seems to be a bigger concern.  That much of the recent history of this page shows involvement by paid employee(s) of the company that is the subject of the article sharpens my concerns. --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 23:20, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whitewash?
Talk:Marketing part number

message: "Marketing part number" hardly seems like an Apple-specific term, , , , etc. 24.17.48.241 00:38, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, we'll need to fix it up. Apple uses it frequently and I felt people needed somewhere to look it up. --vossman 13:07, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Olfactory bulb

message: I suggest adding more detail describing how the connectivity of the olfactory bulb informs theories of its function.
Included in this general wish, I have a few specific topics that, if expanded, would make this entry more informative.
Explain the term "sponges" It cannot mean a being of the phylum Porifera for those are lacking a brain.    —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.161.3.101 (talk) 06:03, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Possible source of information on integration between OB and SVZ: "Synaptic Integration of Adult-Generated Olfactory Bulb Granule Cells: Basal Axodendritic Centrifugal Input Precedes Apical Dendrodendritic Local Circuits." Mary C. Whitman, and Charles A. Greer. The Journal of Neuroscience, 12 September 2007, 27(37): 9951-9961; doi: 10.1523/​JNEUROSCI.1633-07.2007  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.9.142.188 (talk) 19:24, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Detail

message: It is quite possible, however, that function has not been conserved with structure, indicating that olfactory bulbs of distant species may be paralogs of each other.
I'm not sure what this is trying to say, but I suspect that paralog is being used incorrectly (even putting aside the fact that the term usually refers to genes, not structures).  Perhaps the use of the term is based on the mistaken belief that divergence of function makes things paralogs.  Or perhaps the intended meaning is that the olfactory bulbs are analogous but not homologous, and their similarities are due to convergent evolution. 71.178.58.56 (talk) 01:40, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paralogy 

message: I am a little concerned that the only mention of its relation to the limbic system is in the category at the bottom.  I mention this not only because it is part of this system, but because a relation to emotions, as I have learned from a psychologist.--John Bessa (talk) 00:59, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Limbic system

message: It would be extremely helpful to give information about what superstructures the olfactory bulb is considered a sub-part of.  If it is not in the telenchephalon, where is it?  Also, is it a part of the olfactory gyrus, or only linked to it?  And is it generally considered part of the limbic system as suggested above?  I hope that a thorough, rather than superficial description of where it belongs will be added.
66.99.96.11 (talk) 20:13, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location of O.Bulb 

message: I added additional information about the accessory olfactory bulb and how it works in relation to the the main olfactory bulb. In addition, I included information about olfactory dysfunction and the ways they impact the olfactory system. This is part of my Neuroscience 100 class at Middlebury College. We will continue editing the page based on feedback from fellow wikipedia editors, peers, and professors.Vmanjarrez Talk Page Vmanjarrez (talk) 22:04, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Middlebury College students
Talk:Panyo Panyo Di Gi Charat

message: I second this motion - Squilibob 00:53, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I take it back, the article is evolving into quite a large article now - Squilibob 03:07, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur.  I believe that the articles should be separate.  It would take up too much space to combine them.--Tally Solleni 16:03, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Another vote for non merge.  This is a definably separate series. -- Miwa 23:55, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with main Di Gi Charat article

message: I think that this sentence needs to be re-worded, but I'm having a little difficulty understanding what it's supposed to say (no offense to the original contributor).
"In Episodes 41 and 42 when Rinna runs fast it's exact same speed that how Sonic the Hedgehog runs and her MPH is 761"
??  Anyone else care to give me a hand with this?--Tally Solleni 04:04, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It sounds made up to me. I can't remember those episodes so I'll have to watch it again. --Squilibob 06:49, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification 

message: Technically, either one is correct, at least according to Wiktionary.  Which one should we use in the article?  I personally vote for chaperone, but that's just me.--Tally Solleni 22:31, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chaperone or chaperon? 
Talk:Green Party of Ontario

message: Can someone review the current listing for Green Party of Ontario#Shadow_Cabinet and update it with the info from https://gpo.ca/shadow-cabinet/ ? 24.212.142.143 (talk) 06:48, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: While it's true that the party has a series of spokespeople designated to articulate party policy on various issues, they're not a true "shadow cabinet" just because the party chooses to call them that — it has zero elected MPPs in the house, which gives the people no constitutional or political standing, and the media do not devote any attention to the party's positions on any issue besides the environment (and electoral reform to a much lesser extent), so these people have no public visibility for the purposes of making them notable for being party spokespeople. So it's not that the list should be updated — it doesn't belong in this article at all. Bearcat (talk) 07:20, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  GPO Shadow Cabinet 

message: One of the founders was  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.15.170.35 (talk) 15:45, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:   This party was founded by Elizabeth May, now the leader of the Green Party of Canada.[9]
Talk:Frank de Jong

message: Hello,
Does anyone have any information about the 1993 GPO leadership campaign?  Specifically: what was the final vote total, were there any other candidates besides Harris and de Jong, where did it take place, how many were in attendance? CJCurrie 00:54, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: GPO leadership convention, 1993

message: The GPO conference which chose its first leader was held in Ottawa. About 30 members were in attendance. There were only two contestants, Jim and I, but I don't remember the final vote count. I don't think there are any archives from that event. --  Frank de Jong 03:23, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  1993 GPO Leadership contest 

message: I know he moved from Ottawa to Toronto sometime after June, 1997. He was teaching shop class part-time at Broadview Elementary in 1996-1997, but someone else was the following year. -- RealGrouchy 06:09, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ottawa to Toronto 
Talk:2005 Lake Tanganyika earthquake

message: Would 2005 Lake Tanganyika earthquake be a more appropriate title for this article ?  -- PFHLai 00:58, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Good. East African earthquake, 2005 is now a redirect to this page. -- PFHLai 02:34, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Besides, given Wikipedia's usual split up of Africa, with the DRC considered part of Central Africa and not East Africa, the previous name was not as helpful as one might wish. Caerwine Caerwhine 15:21, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Title
Talk:Portsmouth Naval Shipyard

message: The Portsmouth Naval Shipyard was established 1800, however the USS Ranger (1777) was built already before at Portsmouth. Was there some other naval shipyard before? Also, any explanation why it took 14 years until the USS Washington (1814) was built when the PNS was established in 1800? Ekem 23:24, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Beginnings
Talk:Anna Rosmus

message: Rewritten at Anna Rosmus/Temp. Kappa 01:06, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Hiram Bingham II

message: It's misleading to write that he was one of the first missionaries to introduce Christianity to Hawaii, since by the time he was born the missionaries already were ministering for over ten years!  Monsieurtode 01:07, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Te Baibara : ae ana taeka te atua ae kanoana te o tetemanti ma te nu tetemanti ae kaetaki man taetae nako ake e moa ni koreaki iai 
https://archive.org/details/tebaibaraaeanata00bing
Te Euankerio are koreaki iroun Ioane, ae kaetaki man taetae n erene
https://archive.org/details/teeuankerioareko00bing
https://archive.org/details/teeuankerioareko02bing
Rajmaan (talk) 23:27, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Works by Bingham
Talk:Hurricane Diana (1984)

message: More impact, pictures, references. Jdorje 04:25, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I notched it down to a Start class... not quite good enough for B. What might help is this website. Hurricanehink 20:20, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Inline references would get it to C class, should anyone ever get to it.  Thegreatdr (talk) 17:27, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Todo

message: Juliancolton 16:17, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Be bold and look for the answer.Mitch32contribs 16:27, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Were there any direct fatalities?

message: I removed the sentence "NASA also redirected the scheduled landing of the Space Shuttle Discovery in Cape Canaveral, Florida to Oklahoma." from the Preparation section. Discovery had already landed at Edwards before this storm formed. It is possible that the sentence was referring to the relocation flight from Edwards back to the cape, but I was unable to find a reference for this. If someone can dig up a ref for that, it would be a great addition. --Tgeairn (talk) 04:36, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed from Preparation
Talk:Dynamic library

message: A large part of the content on the general library (computer science) page on dynamic linking and  should probably be pulled out into two separate articles.
* A general article on dynamic libraries and implemenations
* An article on the concept of dynamic linking, its history, etc.
Other considerations:
* The concepts of dynamic linking and shared libraries are independent. There are implementation of dynamic libraries that are not shared, and vice versa.
* There should probably be separate articles that go into detail about each shared library implemenation.
Jsmethers 01:13, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Divide the main library page
Talk:Munter hitch

message: It would be nice if the article could say something about whether the knot has a specific braking position, and, if so, what it is. Unfortunately, I'm seeing contradictory info. Let's call it 0 degrees when the brake strand and load strand are basically touching one another, and 180 degrees when the brake and load strand form a line with the carabiner in the middle. The standard mountaineering textbook Mountaineering: The Freedom of the Hills discusses the knot, but doesn't state any braking position. A private instructor (Kier Stiteler) and this video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=02RrSIRl_rQ both say 0 is braking and 180 degrees is maximum travel (the opposite of belay devices such as the ATC). Rock Climbing, Kidd and Hazelrigs, says brake position is with the strands at 90 degrees. Alpine Climbing, Houston and Cosley, says the brake position is the same as the traveling position, "brake strand is parallel to the rope going to the climber;" it's not clear whether "parallel" means 0 degrees or 180 degrees here.--75.83.64.6 (talk) 22:41, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I have been told that 0 degrees is considerably more effectice because you can press both parts of the rope against each other in your fists, thereby generate additional friction which helps with the braking. I think 180 degrees is about as good as 90 degrees, as long as you do not do something weird like wrapping the knot around opposite ends of the carabiner, Probably something which one would have to try out, though. Yaan (talk) 20:38, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I've been studying up on the physics behind knots, and it looks to me like 0 degrees is the best braking position, and the reason is actually not to do with the hands, but is a matter of friction between the rope and the carabiner. However, for WP purposes it's not good enough for me to have done the calculations and convinced myself. We need a published, verifiable source. I'm obtaining the standard text on the physics of knots via interlibrary loan, and will see if I can find an explicit, citable statement to this effect.--75.83.64.6 (talk) 00:55, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

text: I think both the braking and the traveling position are at 180 degrees. When the load (climber) is moving, the brake hand is holding the brake strand at 180 but loosely.  To brake, the brake strand is pulled hard at 180.  To lock the climber off, the brake strand is wrapped further around the carabiner to 0 degrees (parallel to the load strand).RobLandau (talk) 22:47, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: braking position?
Talk:Warrigal Creek Massacre

message: Jun: Ronald Macalister is murdered near Port Albert. Warrigal Creek massacre
"carried out in reprisal. (Some sources give date as July)."
:from "Steps in Time: A Gippsland Chronology to 1899" Rich   Farmbrough 01:24, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Month

message: It strikes me that this article should be renamed to “Warrigal Creek Massacre”, as the creek is otherwise not noteworthy and would not merit a Wikipedia article.
Can anyone think of a good reason not to do this? ollee (talk) 22:36, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Support. It seems like a reasonable idea to me, although WP:NCE is not entirely clear on this. It gives one example (Babi Yar) where only the place is used as the name of the article. I think it's a judgement call – but looking at the others in the List of massacres of Indigenous Australians article, most seem to have "massacre" appended, and it would be in sync with. e.g. Waterloo Plains massacre and others in the Australian context. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 03:26, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the context Laterthanyouthink, I've made the change and also updated the article to reflect the change of focus ollee (talk) 06:29, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops, I forgot to mention, "massacre" should begin with a small letter... Might only be possible via a request on the Technical moves page - but give it a whirl and see, ? Or perhaps you can undo the move and do it again? Laterthanyouthink (talk) 06:35, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename article
Talk:Noose

message: These two articles are of the same topic and should be merged  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.138.35.25 (talk) 14:05, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: A hangman's knot is a type of noose; a noose is not necessarily a hangman's knot. They should not be merged. 72.200.151.13 (talk) 19:21, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose, for same reasons stated by 72.200.151.13 above.  See reply below to more recent merge request for additional discussion.  --Dfred (talk) 16:44, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal

message: I may be wrong, but this is traditionally refered to as a half-hitch. A noose and a hangmans knot are used interchangably for what Wikipedia lists as the hangman's knot. Rarely you'll find that a noose refers to any slipknot. - Dastal 01:26, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: That's what I thought too (hence my note at the top of the article linking to the actual noose) but plenty of people seem to disagree.  Maybe it's an american word or something? Ojw 19:52, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: srsly.  Politics has taken this over -- And poorly organized and sourced politics at that.  I'm going to try to reorganize everything here, restore old sections, and cut out the superfluous sections.
139.102.239.12 (talk) 21:04, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: worst page ever

message: There are three articles that probably should be merged into noose; Tarbuck knot, Running bowline, and Hangman's knot.  Each of these is a "noose" and is pretty much a stub on their own aside from Hangman's knot, which needs some trimming to make it encyclopedic.  Merging into noose seems the best way to achieve an article that is complete, encyclopedic, and not fragmented to the reader searching for information on this topic. Chrisw80 (talk) 19:12, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Running bowline]]
Talk:Sabre Corporation

message: There is only one line connecting Sabre to American Airlines.  This is poor because it overemphasizes M&A activity in the last decade over the role of Sabre to American Airlines.  Apparently, AA made more money selling other airlines' seats through Sabre than those airlines did.  This is critical to understanding Travelocity as an web interface to the backend Sabre systems (and the profound effect of the web overall), the rise of other ticketing engines.  TelecomNut  (talk)  16:22, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability in Travel Services

message: So, it's curious that AA's litigation against (formerly in-house) Sabre is on hold. Is AA favoring Sabre over Apollo (Galileo) and Travelport? Let's discuss with references from news sources. Thanks. --Inetpuppy (talk) 06:34, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  AMR likes Sabre: is it favoritizm?
Talk:Jefatura de Inteligencia del Estado Mayor Conjunto de las Fuerzas Armadas

message: Moved from División de Inteligencia del Estado Mayor de la Defensa because Estado Mayor de la Defensa is actually the Chilean military's joint General Staff; see http://www.defensa.cl
User:Sjms 01:49, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Boxer

message: Why should this link to Fists of Righteous Harmony members when it could just be linking to Boxer Rebellion? link changed to Boxer Rebellion, from 
"Fists of Righteous Harmony members, that lead the Chinese Boxer Rebellion in 1900"—Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.171.247.106 (talk) 01:58, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Elli (talk | contribs) 02:19, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Boxer (disambiguation) →  – It seems unclear, especially when using third party search engines, if readers looking up the term "boxer" are primarily looking for someone who participates in the sport of boxing or Boxer (breed). This looks like a case where there are co-dominant subjects where it is not clear which one readers are looking for when searching the term. Steel1943 (talk) 18:52, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 26 September 2022 

message: I redirected 'boxers' here, but it should perhaps be a separate dab page. Srnec (talk) 13:19, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Boxers]]
Talk:Legislative Assembly of British Columbia

message: Standings need to be updated, there is now one vacant seat pending by-election Mmj125 (talk) 23:55, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tracy redies resignation 

message: We need to update the parliament as the mail in ballots are counted DG745 (talk) 02:25, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parliament update 

message: Shouldn't the 41st parliament be NDP-Green Party coalition? 
Zacharycmango (talk) 23:53, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The parties did not form a coalition; the Green Party agreed to support an NDP minority government. That's an important distinction: a coalition government has two (or more) parties in cabinet and contributing to the government's agenda, which is not what happened in BC. The Green Party did not join cabinet or the government caucus, and their influence on policy and direction was informal and limited. — Kawnhr (talk) 00:02, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Green Party Alliance 2017

message: There doesn't seem to be any coverage in Wikipedia of the scandal about the spending of senior staff, including Clerk James Craig, e.g. https://vancouversun.com/news/local-news/former-clerk-of-the-bc-legislature-to-be-sentenced-today-for-breach-of-trust . That may merit an article of its own, but if not, it ought to be mentioned somewhere.Bill (talk) 04:20, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Spending Scandal
Talk:Boo-Yaa T.R.I.B.E.

message: Uh, am I right in thinking we should change this articles name to Boo-Yaa T.R.I.B.E.? Thanks. Darth Katana X 23:41, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  It's "Boo-Yaa T.R.I.B.E." 

message: It looks like this article became a cut and paste copyvio with this revision.  The copied infromation appears to come from this article.  There's been a lot of successive edits.  Undoing this is going to be messy. -- Whpq (talk) 20:08, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Copypaste

message: A certain person claims that the majority of Boo-Yah T.R.I.B.E.'s albums are "non-notable" and keeps redirecting them to the group's page. While I find this patently ridiculous, I also realize it is pointless to keep undoing back and forth. For the time being, I wash my hands of this. Gringo300 (talk) 15:07, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: non-notable?