lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Legio VII Claudia

message: The number of legions with Caesar in Gaul grew throughout the years, but the lowest numerical designation was 7; for instance, in the second year of the war (for the Belgic campaign), he had legions 7 through 14. The article implies that at the beginning of the war he had legions 6 through 9, presumed to be brought in from Spain. This is incorrect. Also, Caesar didn't just order up legions at the beginning of the war because he felt like it (that is, to serve his pleasure and ambition); this is a very Hollywood notion. The senate granted him legions formally to support his legitimate proconsulship: he was governor of Cisalpina and Transalpina, as well as Illyria. He did recruit additional legions on his own initiative without senate funding, which alarmingly increased his power. But until he crossed the Rubicon after the Gallic Wars, Caesar was not acting as a renegade, and although the propriety of specific actions was discussed in Rome, overall he operated within the scope of Roman law and custom. The only thing that was extraordinary about his proconsulship was its duration (but that was duly affirmed by legislation) and its amazing success.
Also, the article doesn't explain the origin of the Claudia designation, which would seem at odds with its incarnation under Pompey or under Julius Caesar. Cynwolfe (talk) 20:43, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legions with Caesar in Gaul; the Claudia designation
Talk:Rannerdale Knotts

message: The page seems to be more about the novel than the fell. While material on topography, geology, ascents etc certainly needs to be added, would it be better to move the bulk of the other material to a page either on Size or his novel Secret Valley. Obviously a brief description and links would remain here. Comments?  Bobble Hat 20:46, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Battle of Rannerdale
Talk:List of diplomatic missions in Singapore

message: There is now a discussion at WP:FOR on the formatting and content of "List of diplomatic missions" articles. As this discussion ostensibly could affect this article, editors are encouraged to provide their opinions on the WP:FOR at this link - Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_International_relations#Formatting_of_diplomatic_missions_lists - please do not discuss on this article talk page as valid points for consideration may very well not be seen by editors at large. Thank you, --Russavia Dialogue Stalk me 23:47, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion at WP:FOR on formatting and content of "List of diplomatic missions" article 
Talk:Legio VIII Augusta

message: "In 69 AD, the Year of the Four Emperors, following the suicide of Nero, the legion took the part of Vitellius, one of the defeated emperors"  This is wrong. The legion supported Otho, then Vespasian. See Gwyn Morgan, 69 A.D. : the year of the four emperors p. 190.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.133.56.108 (talk) 07:33, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  69
Talk:Legio XII Fulminata

message: How do we know that The Forty came from Legio XII Fulminata? Is this recorded anywhere in a credible source or is this speculation? Aramgar 21:17, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Forty Martyrs of Sebaste

message: From a footnote: IMP DOMITIANO CAESARE AVG GERMANICO LVCIVS IVLIVS MAXIMVS LEGIONIS XII FVL, which an editor translated as "To Emperor Domitian etc. etc." But the emperor's name is ablative, so shouldn't this mean "during the imperial reign of Domitian etc."? Rwflammang (talk) 16:53, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Translation

message: "Lightning-Struck" does not convey the Latin meaning of fulminata, which is better translated as "carrying the lightning bolt". The Legion was not struck by lightning, it struck its opponents as if it were armed with lightning.
192.223.243.5 (talk) 18:14, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Latin Translation of Fulminata
Talk:Legio I Adiutrix

message: Before anyone gets funny about the removal of this factoid there's no mention of the legion either in the source cited, or the relevant passage of Pliny
http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.02.0137%3Abook%3D7%3Achapter%3D16  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.200.67.73 (talk) 05:51, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gabara 

message: What role did they play were they like a marine force because they were sailors or heavy infantry or light? 2600:1017:B1DC:35DC:B4DC:64DD:81B6:8039 (talk) 13:40, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  What role did legio I play
Talk:Global Indian International School, Singapore

message: dear respected sir
i need information about study in 10th std for my son.
we are india nationalty holding and we stay in yogyakarta city in indonesia.
my son study in indonesia school.
n we need addmision in indian international school in singapore. so please help us for term and condition about global ndian international school in singapore.
please reply us soon as possible.
thank you very much for helping
thank you and regard
devanand v dhanwani
#REDIRECT [[
#REDIRECT Target page name
]]  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.169.230.220 (talk) 16:21, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  addmision 

message: This article looks like an advertisement. Can we remove some of this please?
*I just revamped the entire article - removing promotional/commercial oriented statements and implementing a more neutral style. I organized all the awards/praises thrown all around the article into a new section called 'awards'. I also added some images and new information in the history section. The article is now concise, accurate, clean and neutral. ∞4 (talk) 09:09, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality

message: The source supporting this tiny section contains this statement (my emphasis): "Reflecting the importance of Sanskrit to the Indian diaspora, the Global Indian International School has made Sanskrit a compulsory subject for its 1,800 primary school pupils in Singapore, using textbooks from India's National Council of Educational Research and Training. An editor has repeatedly revised the article to say Sanskrit is an optional subject. Perhaps that is true. However Wikipedia content is based published sources and our source says it is compulsory.  So to change it to optional we need a newer source saying that.  Meanwhile it remains compulsory. Wikipedia content requires verifiability.  The burden falls on the editor adding new content to supply an inline citation that supports it.  This is especially true when that content has been challenged. Gab4gab (talk) 14:23, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sanskrit a compulsory subject 

message: Fails NSCHOOL. Better to redirect to the List of Global Schools Foundation schools. RPSkokie (talk) 08:54, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed redirection of Global Indian International School, Singapore, to List of Global Schools Foundation schools
Talk:Rajani Thiranagama

message: When I started this page in January 2005 I had very little information about Rajini from our medical school days, but wanted her to be known for what she did.  I am happy it has grown to what it is today, even then I expected this to be controvercial but did not expect the this degree of feeling.
I hope the apologists for LTTE will be genours to her and leve these pages alone now that their great leader who ordered her to be killed is dead!
sirimewan  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sirimewan (talk • contribs) 14:29, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What is the matter with the links I have provided? This article needs to be fair and balanced. I thought that this was supposed to be a Sri Lankan reconciliation project.  If you guys are not going to allow others with different viewpoints to post links or to edit too, then this so called Peace Project is nothing but a hoax, just like the so called ceasefire. Wiki Raja 03:17, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You posted the same question after I removed the same links from Rajan Hoole, so I'll direct you to my answer thereTalk:Rajan_Hoole --snowolfD4(  talk /  @ ) 18:37, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Why the removal of my links?

message: I kind of remember the documentary made mention that she had severed ties with the LTTE. I came to this page to remind myself what those were. If anyone has some history on that, please add to the page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.170.123.249 (talk) 16:55, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Post LTTE involvement 
Talk:Pinkerton syndrome

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot 12:33, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-02-8 Automated pywikipediabot message 

message: Perhaps should mention Pinkerton Syndrome is commonly referred to as "崇洋" in East Asia.
::it is widely fell in malaysia. even if you spend more money them the white guy, you get less service... they look at you funny when you can't understand malay even after you ask them "do you speak english!?" while they automatically speak english to the white dude... ;P Akinkhoo (talk) 05:55, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pinkerton Syndrome in Chinese
Talk:Legio VII Gemina

message: :ΛΕΤ. Ζ. ΔΙΔύμη,
Shouldn't the third letter be a gamma? --84.20.17.84 16:09, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gamma 

message: So where exactly was this legion? Here it states it was raised by Galbs in Spain and marched with him to Rome.
 
In the article on M. Antonius Primus it says it was with the later in Pannonia and marched on Rome with him. 
In the article on Roman Legions it sates the unit was at Leon (in fact giving the city it's name no less) until the barbarians came. 
Tacitus seems to think, as I recall, that 'Legio VII Galbania' was raised in Spain by Galba and marched with him to Rome (perhaps because of the urgency of the situation they were not offically named so Tatitus' name is one of convenience). Once in Rome they turned on Galba and helped Otho to power, then were sent to Pannonia to avoid trouble. In Pannonia  they switched sides to support Vespasian and marched on Rome (again) and hoisted it's leader, Antonius Primus, to temporary defacto rule. Then were returned to Pannonia for the same reasons as before by the new emperor, Vespasian.
Hypothetically there they merged with the disgaced Legio I Germania and beacme known as Legio VII Gemina. After some sucusses against the Quadii they were honored by Vespasian as Legio VII Gemina Felix (as a sop to the dissapointed Antonius Primus perhaps, it would not have cost Vespasian an as). Then the legion was sent to Leon to keep an eye on the important Spainish mines. There, they re-built an abandoned camp into a permanent settlement that was named after them (Leon). After some time they became known as Legio VII Gemella
Does anyone else have any evidence to fill out the history of this legion? 124.183.73.234 07:04, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Here, there & everywhere 

message: According to the Notitia Dignitatum, there was as well a Septima Gemina in the field army of the East (that is, Roman Syria and neighbouring lands), under the Magister Militum per Orientem_"http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Magister_Militum_per_Orientem_1.jpg"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.8.98.118 (talk) 12:42, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Late-Roman Syrian Detachment 

message: The name Gemina is used by several Legions, and it is suggested by some scholars (including Stephen Dando-Collins in his "Legions of Rome", 2010) that this is not related to the she-wolf and Romulus and Remus. Instead, some legions were formed by the shattered remains of two other legions (like after a battle or campaign), forming a twin.
In this case this applies when Vespasian in 70 AD merged the remains of the 7th legion (until now named VII Hispaniana/Galbiana) with the not at full strength XIIX legion (reformed by Nero regardless of Augustus "order" never to use the numbers 17-19 again after the defeat at the Teutoburger). The legion combined by these forces was named Legio VII Gemina. 2A00:801:7B7:DE4F:1124:CA68:D482:1C04 (talk) 15:56, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of the name "Gemina"
Talk:Legio XVIII

message: I just wanted to say that XIIX means "11 + 9" as I learned in my Latin class. The Romans would NEVER write XIIX because 11+9 is 20 so they would just write "XX". In any case, the Roman numeral for 18 is on the wiki page correctly as well as XVIII which is the one and only way to write it. If somebody knows an alternate way to write 18 in Roman numerals I'd very much like to see the source information on that, thank you. 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legio_XIIX#cite_note-0 - 18th Legion Wiki
The problem is also on the page under the Centurion Wiki (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centurion) underneath the photo of the cenotaph to Marcus Caelius  
Sincerely, 
A concerned lover of wikipedia.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.189.221.39 (talk) 04:31, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: In Latin classes, one learns "standard Latin," but the Romans did not have a compendium of spelling rules. I added a picture of an epitaph to the article that uses the XIIX spelling, and if you get into inscriptions etc you will find that spelling variants were very common (just as they are today, with the difference however that today most languages have defined spelling rules which make certain variants actual misspellings, which is not true for non-modern languages). Skäpperöd (talk) 06:07, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legio_XIIX#cite_note-0 

message: As I've already pointed out, Nero never raised a 18th legion. It's all a faulty translation.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.8.98.118 (talk) 11:39, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  I propose deleting the last paragraph
Talk:Legio XX Valeria Victrix

message: I note the claim that this is a geographical title, but other explanations have also been given: (1) that valeria means 'strong, robust' (from the verb valere); (2) that it commemorates Marcus Valerius Messala; and (3) that it commemorates Claudius's wife Valeria Messalina.
I think, at the very least, a citation is needed for this claim.
Djwilms (talk) 06:59, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The significance of the title ''Valeria'' 

message: In the very first section, showing where Legions were based, the caption says that Legio X was based at the castra of Deva Victrix until c. the 3rd Century.
However, under 'History', the latest date of their occupation of Deva Victrix is given as c. the 5th Century.
Which is correct...? 109.78.236.91 (talk) 14:25, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Temporal conflict between two sections of the article...
Talk:Legio XXII Deiotariana

message: I've restored the content discussing the end of the legion, with the change made while it was it's own article - I can't see any good reason for this to be split off from the main article, and very few pages link to that article.31.219.90.211 (talk) 06:46, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging of demise
Talk:Legio XXII Primigenia

message: ==Naissus?==
How could the XXII Primigenia be fighting for Claudius Gothicus in the Battle of Naissus while they were defending the Rhine frontier for the Gallic Empire? Q·L·1968 ☿ 20:50, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: How could the XXII Primigenia be fighting for Claudius Gothicus in the Battle of Naissus while they were defending the Rhine frontier for the Gallic Empire? Q·L·1968 ☿ 20:50, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Naissus?
Talk:Florida State Road 41

message: Okay, I admit, I messed-up the re-direction here. DanTD 15:15, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Port of Singapore

message: This article claims that the Port of Singapore is currently the busiest port by tonnage, the article on the Port of Shanghai claims that it has been the busiest port by tonnage since 2005.  Only one of these claims can be true.  I reference this comment on the Port of Shanghai talk page.
Stephen.G.McAteer (talk) 07:20, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction with other page 

message: How is freight moved to from the port; truck, train, plane???? and if by car what road does it use to get there? and if by rail what railway line is used? and what airport for a plane??? 220.253.106.21 (talk) 14:50, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Transport

message: Please read the report from the Tamasek Review, which claims that "Shanghai’s container traffic surpassed Singapore’s last year, making the wealthiest city of China the world’s busiest port as the economy churns out more goods for export and draws in greater trade flows"
Here is the link: http://www.temasekreview.com/2011/01/08/shanghai-surpasses-singapore-as-worlds-busiest-port-as-trade-volumes-jump/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jalal0 (talk • contribs) 13:41, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: PSA is not the world's busiest port
Talk:Jurong Port

message: It is a fact that Jurong Port had a fatal accident. I would appreciate if the employees from Jurong Port stop deleting this part. Thanks. --Shorty23sin (talk) 02:17, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accident inside Jurong Port 

message: What I found out from most of the KTMB staff formerly stationed in Singapore that Jurong Port indeed had railway history (Jurong Line). But I don't know if I put it in the article as part of the "History" section will it stay there for long? Or will that part be deleted shortly. Kyrios320 (talk) 13:00, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another issue about the Jurong Port article 
Talk:Animal Welfare Party for the Netherlands

message: User:Cwoyte moved this article was moved but the party itsself uses the translation "Party for the Animals"
"Party for the Animals
The Party for the Animals is a Dutch political party that aims to improve the position of animals in our society. The party was founded to promote an awareness of the way in which humans treat animals and to emphasise that this needs to change – in the interest of not only the animals themselves, but also humans and the environment in which we all live. " - from the link on this lemma. Therefore  I've moved it back C mon 14:15, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Rajan Hoole

message: What is the matter with the links I have provided? This article needs to be fair and balanced. Also, why did you take off the Tamil link? After all, your Hoole is a Tamil isn't he? Or is he your token Tamil? Wiki Raja 03:12, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As per my edit summery, read WP:EL. It tells all :) --snowolfD4(  talk /  @ ) 03:14, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Why the Removal of links?
Talk:Delta Omicron

message: Why was the crest deleted? – Chris53516 (Talk) 14:17, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Crest

message: I will be trying to give this page a major overhaul whenever I find time to do so.  Any input would be nice. Crazzycorbe(Talk) 15:14, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major Overhaul 

message: I dropped by to give an assessment/do some minor clean ups according to the MOS.
# Provide a fair use rationale for your crest. An example is shown with :Image:AKAshield2.png
# Second, this article looks as though it was copied from a website. Wikipedia does not allow copyright vios. If you would like to cite a fact through a website, you can. See references for more information.
# Wikipedia must have a neutral point of view. This article, IMHO, reads like a rush flyer for someone to join the organization, which is a big no-no. The list of chapters, according to the manual of style, needs to be deleted.
That's all I can think of now. Cheers. Miranda 03:31, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, could you please not remove maintenance tags, because they help readers to know what is wrong with the article and how the article can be improved. Thanks. Miranda 23:48, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

text: Most articles (at least 70%) have tags on their mainpage. I don't understand why this should be exempt? Also, most people looking at this article don't know about the talk page. So, please leave them up because they belong in mainspace. Miranda 23:41, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment
Talk:PDMS (software)

message: Please post your comment and ideas for this article here.
Thank You.DarrelHoward 14:20, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Talk pages are for discussing an article, not its subject. If you want help to find information about something in real life, please see the Reference desk, in this case the science & engineering section. Please read the boxes at the top of that page (before the Table of Contents) very carefully before asking a question. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 18:07, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Cotter High School (Winona, Minnesota)

message: Please do not add people without a Wikipedia article to the alumni section of the article. See WP:Note for the criteria required for inclusion. For the edit that IP 64.238.244.2 is trying to make, the specific notability guideline is WP:Politician. Thank you --ponyo (talk) 19:21, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: After explaining the notability criteria on the IP talk page here, I have again removed the non-notable/unsourced alumni addition. If it is added back in I will follow-up at dispute resolution.ponyo (talk) 20:26, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable alumni
Talk:The Child (Star Trek: The Next Generation)

message: The plot summary here seems to be excessive detail.  We have actual quotes from dialog, even when this is not really needed.  In fact, I'd go as far as saying that the summary section here reads more like an adaption of the episode into a short story rather than a summary.  Morwen - Talk 14:26, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Public housing in Singapore

message: I noticed that Timothyhouse1 copied a large amount of text from my website (www.teoalida.com), beside copyright violation, you overloaded Wikipedia with too many architectural details, the page became non-sense because you did not copied the full article from my website, especially since I wrote it to be understandable only together with images shown on my website.
I provide a detailed study of evolution of public housing in Singapore from 1930s to present, Wikipedia readers may benefit of this, but please remove the copied text and add instead an external link to my website. I would like to do this myself but I get the warning of possible conflict of interest.
Secondly, I notice that Pricing section do not cite any references. I am personally interested in HDB prices along history, and I cannot find such info anywhere except in this article, which are unclear and most likely, WRONG. What is the source of these per-decade prices? Prices have varied from year to year, and in central area the prices are double than at city outskirts. You cannot provide 1970s prices, 1980s prices, etc.
Flat sizes in sqm are also wrong. During 1970s 3-room flats were 2 types: Improved 60 sqm and New Generation 67 sqm, same for 4-room flats: Improved 82 sqm, New Generation 92 sqm. During 1980s, 3-room flats were again 2 types: Simplified 64 sqm and Model A 75 sqm, same for 4-room flats: Simplified 84 sqm and Model A 104-108 sqm. NO 3-room flats were build from 1989 to 2002, so from where the 1990s 3-room prices came from? No Executive flats were built since 2004, so from where the 2010s Executive price came from? SBF? Prices offered in BTO (which will be completed in 3-4 years) are about 20% cheaper than the prices of repurchased flats (completed, ready to move) offered in SBF. Which of the prices are the ones shown in this article? Also the 5-Room flats were NEVER less than 117 sqm until 2000s reduction to 110 sqm. The number stated on this articles 95 sqm for 1970s 5-room flats are clearly WRONG, so I assume that prices are also WRONG.
I could fix myself the errors in flats sqm but how about the prices? I suggest removal of Pricing section to avoid misleading people providing wrong info, unless we can find reliable sources.
Teoalida (talk) 18:00, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source of data 

message: Something seems to be wrong with the pricing table.
No way is an executive HDB just 55K in 2010. Where is this information coming from?
Orangewarning (talk) 08:25, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pricing