lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Fanny Deakin

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. --KenWalker | Talk 06:34, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Khachmaz District

message: Unless something happens to improve this article soon, it is likely to become a stub. There are various maintenance tags in place that have existed for some considerable time and there appears to have been no real attempt to address the (valid) issues raised. As I am fluent only in English and Gibberish, I have struggled, on and off, to resolve the issues myself. If no-one else can do so then the article is likely to be cut right back to the bone. Any offers? Sure, the place exists and there are some not-particularly-reliable English sources for some of the content but I have not been able to make much headwya. I'll give it another shot myself but some assistance would be appreciated. - Sitush (talk) 23:27, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean up 

message: There was a citations needed template on the coords/elevation but I moved it into the infobox and had to remove the cn tag because I don't think that works in a template.  RJFJR (talk) 14:51, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations needed
Talk:Latacunga

message: I'm wondering what, exactly, a "square" is. Could someone clarify this in the article?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.112.232.84 (talk) 00:47, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historic downtown "squares" 
Talk:Latin Anthology

message: This article is problematic for using the dismissive Encyclopedia Brittanica text, given that the Latin Anthology's documented history goes at least to the 6th century. See quite specific comments on the strangeness of the Brittanica article here: https://www.jstor.org/stable/4342540?&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents. Some Remarks on the "Latin Anthology". The Classical Weekly Vol. 42, No. 10 (Feb. 21, 1949), pp. 147-153.
The easiest solution seems to be translating the much better German article. --♦♦♦Vlmastra♦♦♦ (talk) 04:37, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Poor text from Encyclopedia Brittanica
Talk:Latium adiectum

message: Any initial comments?Dave (talk) 00:25, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Initial comments

message: Seems highly unlikely that this is the  of this area, over Latium Adjectum, New Latium, &c. Someone should do some quick Googlefu at Books and Ngram and move it to the proper location, fixing the links from Old Latium and Latium#History. — LlywelynII 08:02, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Move

message: This article would really benefit from a map rather than a colorful photo. Aldiboront (talk) 21:21, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Map needed
Talk:Arkana

message: The only disambiguation target here seems to be Keny Arkana.  Arkana should be a redirect to that page, and a  hatnote could be added to Keny Arkana to point readers to Arcanum for other uses (like the major arcana and minor arcana). -- JHunterJ 11:36, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Er, did you miss the other entries on the page? <blink> Some obscure rapper shouldn't get this page's redirect--if anything should, arcanum should, but I think this page should remain a DAB for obvious reasons (to me, anyway, apparently, and the other 11 editors who contributed to it...) ∞ΣɛÞ² (τ|c) 13:21, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I saw them -- redlinks and things properly dabbed by Arcanum (disambiguation) (since they aren't spelled with a K). -- JHunterJ 13:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is this disambiguating?
Talk:Laureate

message: In the 1977 Soviet Grand Prix my father-in-law, Rafik Ordyan was named "ДАУРЕАТ" (literally translates to "Laureate"). So should the article be expanded to say this word is used in another context other than solely literary or military? Hovaness (talk) 01:09, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Russian uses

message: Concerned a one of your own Anonymous media company owners and might be ok 2607:FB91:38B:16A8:404D:84FF:FEFE:C3C0 (talk) 22:40, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  PB I terrible or no
Talk:Law of majestas

message: I don't know much about Roman law per se, but in the 1st century BC, a number of men who had just completed a magistracy were brought before the maiestas tribunal for which members of the equestrian order sat as judges. These charges were often politically motivated, or brought for personal revenge. The point is, the charges were not connected to military service, as the article says. Cynwolfe (talk) 14:45, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''maiestas'' in the Late Republic 
Talk:South Andean deer

message: I propose that South Andean Huemul Memorandum of Understanding be merged into South Andean deer. I think that the content in the South Andean Huemul Memorandum of Understanding article can easily be explained in the context of South Andean deer. The material in South Andean Huemul Memorandum of Understanding may have to be condensed so that the merging will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. I think South Andean Huemul Memorandum of Understanding is not sufficiently notable independently of South Andean deer to warrant an article of its own under WP:GNG. Batard0 (talk) 10:38, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Gibsonia, Pennsylvania

message: I was born in Gibsonia in 1939. My father rode the train to work in Pittsburgh and I remember riding the railroad myself. There was a train station at the corner of Gibsonia Rd. (Now Dr 910) and I remember a potbelly stove in the corner. 24.210.207.163 (talk) 14:46, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gibsonia railroad date has to be wrong.
Talk:Leadhills

message: Growing up in the area and regularly visiting both Wanlockhead and Leadhills, I learnt that Leadhills was the highest village in Scotland, and the second was Wanlockhead. Tomintoul was a distant third, being only able to claim the title of "highest village in the Highlands" (1132 ft). The current articles on both Wanlockhead (1304 ft) and Leadhills (1460 ft) claim "second highest", with no reference to "highest", though the Tomintoul entry awards the title to Wanlockhead!  
Should we not clarify this issue? Anarchie76 (talk) 21:50, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Highest village in Scotland?
Talk:Michael Pousti

message: I'm going to go ahead and put the bio of a random McDonald's franchise owener on wikipedia. Or better yet,
a personal history and detailed wikipedia entry about the temporary Vice-Chief-of-Staff's co-assistant of a local bakery.
This is pathetic there's no need for such an article.
* Pretty sure the point of Wikipedia is to have info up on such "random" people that don't get racks of 500 page books dedicated to them.  So go ahead and put up all the bios you want, the wiki will be all the better for it. :)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.199.221.6 (talk) 00:31, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  UNBELIEVABLE
File talk:Melbourne colours.png

message: I changed back to the old version, because I strongly believe that we need to keep the official colours. Sure, it doesn't look the best, but the purple/dark blue combination definitely doesn't look right either. It wouldn't be fair to keep those two colours in alone. Just my thoughts. mdmanser 11:46, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Last time I checked, the official colours were "Navy, purple, gold and white" according to the NRL (http://www.nrl.com.au/Clubs/Storm/StormClubInfo/tabid/204/Default.aspx) - in that order, therefore, shouldn't the colours shown be the blue, purple and gold if you're only showing three, or the white as well if we do go with four??? BradK 04:08, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colours
Talk:-ine

message: the second usage, as identical to IUPAC's -yne, is seldom encountered,
moreover the link used as a citation is dead, 
the info about this second usage is, sadly, not very useful - delete that crap!07:00, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

message: This suffix is also (perhaps even predominantly?) used for amines - most of the amino acids, for example, have names like glycine, leucine and so on, and are not usually considered alkaloids - 'The boundary between alkaloids and other nitrogen-containing natural compounds is not clear-cut. Compounds like amino acid peptides, proteins, nucleotides, nucleic acid, amines, and antibiotics are usually not called alkaloids.' --Oolong (talk) 10:53, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amines...? 

message: It's kind of odd to see no mention of chlorine, fluorine, etc.  My dictionary (mid- to late-twentieth century) gives that as the main use of this suffix, and certainly it's significant.  I'd add something, but I'm not enough of a chemist to know what to say beyond the fact that all of the names end in "ine".  (My last chemistry class was almost half a century ago.)  If someone knowledgeable can either do the necessary work, or say why the halogens are missing, I'd appreciate it.
Davecat4 (talk) 00:12, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Halogens?
Talk:2008 United States Senate election in Iowa

message: General Election
2008 Iowa U.S. Senator general election 
Party Candidate Votes % ±% 
 Democratic Tom Harkin 941,665 62.7 +8.5 
 Republican Christopher Reed 560,006 37.3 -6.5 
  write-ins 1,247 0.0 n/a 
Majority 321,659   
Turnout 1,546,453   
 Democratic hold Swing  
These figures don't add up. The votes add up to 1,502,918, not 1,546,453.
Intelligent Mr Toad (talk) 03:58, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Depending on how 'turnout' is calculated, that discrepancy could perhaps be due to spoiled/blank ballots or some such. However, note also that 941,665-560,006=381,659, not 321,659 - I would guess a typo here. Slapping a 'citeneeded' tag on the table. --GenericBob (talk) 03:11, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There's a link to the official election results on the page if you want to verify the numbers... --Philosopher Let us reason together. 03:17, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That page confirms the first three figures but I can't see anything matching the 'Turnout' or 'Majority' figures given in this article. --GenericBob (talk) 03:01, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Well then.  My guess is that the figures in the article are probably incorrect.  Apparently I added them using the official results here, which includes over- and under-votes, but the turnout doesn't match and I'm not sure where that "majority" came from.  --Philosopher Let us reason together. 05:48, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Guruvaar

message: I can't see why Kingdon doesn't want this to be a page of its own.  There was no indication on discussion page, so redirect was undone.--Markisgreen 12:01, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, there isn't much content here, and the subject is covered on Thursday. If you really want an article here, it could use some work in terms of adding links.  The whole thing strikes me as a case of "If a page is very short and is unlikely to be expanded within a reasonable amount of time, it often makes sense to merge it with a page on a broader topic", in the words of Wikipedia:Merge. Kingdon 19:51, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect
Talk:Lepontine Alps

message: I noticed that sometimes mountains from other Alpine subranges make into the list of the peaks. It might be misleading. Also the list grew very quickly making it not encyclopaedia style, making harder to read the article. There are 1282 named peaks in the Lepontine Alps. All of them are sorted and mapped on the page which I compiled. Due to conflict of interest I can't publish this as a reference but I truly believe that having it in the article would be beneficial for readers and a much better option than growing the list inside the article. A complete list of Lepontine Alps peaks on PeakVisor Peakvisor (talk) 04:45, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
Talk:Carbon dioxide in Earth's atmosphere

message: I have some remaining questions, after I had done the reworking of the article in December last year (see comments above on this talk page). I had asked them to a content expert who had helped me in the past but no answer yet so I am putting them here in the hope that they can be addressed by someone in future:
My question to you today: could you please take another look at the new article now and tell me what you think? In particular what do you think of the new structure? Note that this article is only one of many climate change articles on Wikipedia, and therefore should not go into too much detail about adjacent topics, like the carbon cycle, photosynthesis, greenhouse gas emissions (in general) or the carbon budget. But it should provide a good overview and point people to the right sub-articles where needed. It should pull everything about CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere together in a concise manner.
 
Some specific questions:
#What do you think of the new (current) structure?
#I am actually still wondering how I could introduce the connection to the carbon budget topic better.
# I think there might also still be some paragraphs in the article that are outdated or tangential and that could be cut. (e.g. is this section still up to date?: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_dioxide_in_Earth%27s_atmosphere#Analytical_methods_to_investigate_sources_of_CO2)
#Also, have I missed out any key pieces of information from the technical summary of the WG I report?
#And have I identified the direct effects correctly by saying: Direct effects of increasing CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere include: increasing temperatures on land and in oceans, ocean acidification and a CO2 fertilization effect on plants and crops.
#For the indirect effects, I am pointing people to the article effects of climate change - that should suffice, right? EMsmile (talk) 12:43, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some remaining questions in my mind 

message: — Assignment last updated by LynSchwendy (talk) 03:29, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: EEB 4611-Biogeochemical Processes-Spring 2024
Talk:White Wolf (Yosemite)

message: The notability of this campground is currently unclear, since no secondary sources are cited. By the notability criteria for organizations, independent reliable sources are required to make sure that the subject is notable. These sources might be press coverage about the campground, or books in which the campground is mentioned, maybe extensive coverage in travel guides. 
For the time being, I am replacing the “importance” tag with “notability”. Sorted as part of the Notability wikiproject. --B. Wolterding 12:05, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  notability 

message: The article does not describe the camp very accurately.  First of all, there are two seperate sections to White Wolf.  The National Park Services (NPS) run a camping area right next to the Delaware North Companies (DNC) section - not Curry Co.  The NPS campground is first come first serve and a more typical campground with visitors bringing their own camping equipment.  The DNC campground has twenty-three canvas tents with a cots and a wood burning stove for cold nights along with four bath cabins with running water.  These sites are reserved for almost a year ahead of time, although if tents or rooms open up they will be first come first serve.  The picture of the lodge is part of the DNC campground, but anyone is welcome.  The lodge has hot meals that are served to guests at breakfast and dinner.  Dinner is mainly based off of reservations, but breakfast is open to the public.  White Wolf is known for having some of the best food in the park.  The general store consists of a closet sized room with a minimal selection. There is not a gas station located at White Wolf.  It is a somewhat secluded location that runs off of a generator for the main buildings.  If visiting be prepared to not have any cell phone reception or internet.  It is an incredible location and many hikes can be started at this site.  Some of the best spots can be found in the immediate surroundings (off trail).  The best people to ask about these locations are the employees of White Wolf.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.225.241.118 (talk) 02:26, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accuracy
Talk:Martin Schadt

message: It is hard for me to understand why the tag claims that no sources are cited ...
The source for the description of Martin Schadt is clearly indicated to be Martin Schadt and anybody having doubt in that should contact Martin Schadt.
panjasan 12:10, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Kipengere Range

message: The article treats Kipengere as synonym with Livingstone mountains. That is not correct. See the map at German wikipedia de:Livingstone-Berge. This map is in agreement with the detailed map of Tanganyika geological survey of 1960, which can be checked here:https://esdac.jrc.ec.europa.eu/images/Eudasm/Africa/images/maps/download/afr_tz2005_ge.jpg.
Kipala (talk) 19:18, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Mixup Kipengere - Livingstone Montains
Talk:Llandovery Group

message: As with much material culled from the 11th edn of Encyclopaedia Britannica, there is much in here which is outdated and potentially misleading for the early 21st century reader. I may get around to attending to it but would be pleased if someone knowledgeable on the subject beat me to it! cheers Geopersona (talk) 12:53, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Lockharts of Lee

message: There should be a mention of this relic brought back by Sir Simon Locard from Spain, and still in the hands of the familytoday, except |I can't find any reliable sources, any help? Brendandh (talk) 19:21, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Lee Penny
Talk:Longman

message: I have found this website, which may prove useful to one seeking to expand this article:
http://www.archiveshub.ac.uk/news/0612longman.html 24.167.162.21 (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 03:17, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source 

message: The first revision of this page included at the bottom "This entry was originally from the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica." I believe the text it is referencing can be found at s:Page:EB1911 - Volume 16.djvu/1008 While I was looking for this, I also discovered Longman, Thomas, which may be Encyclopedia Britannica's source. Note especially their mutual use of the word "gentleman". Sondra.kinsey (talk) 20:55, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original source of this article 
Talk:Al-Hasakah District

message: Where was it decided that Rojava wasn't to be mentioned in District articles? Konli17 (talk) 00:55, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Districts are obviously administrative units of the Syrian Arab Republic. There are other articles about the AANES aministrative units. Amr ibn Kulthoumعمرو بن كلثوم (talk) 17:44, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: You didn't answer my question. Konli17 (talk) 21:12, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rojava
Talk:Al-Malikiyah District

message: Are districts of Syria used for administrative purposes by the AANES? The only link in the article is for the 2004 census, and the article uses the present tense although it's been part of the AANES since 2012. Konli17 (talk) 23:43, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Syrian districts
Talk:Raqqa District

message: :Ar-Raqqah District → Al-Raqqah District —
:See Talk:Ar-Raqqah Governorate#Move?.
*In Arabic it is written --l-r-- in unvowelled writing, --lr2-- in vowelled writing with a shadda sign, and pronounced --rr--. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:26, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Move?

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Al-Raqqah#RfC: Title_Al-Raqqah_is_wrong_-_move_to_just_Raqqa which will affect this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. Batternut (talk) 13:10, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: RfC: Title ''Al-Raqqah...'' is wrong - move to just Raqqa District
Wikipedia talk:Administrators' noticeboard/FURG

message: Could people not edit other people's comments. One of mine got unsigned and one of mine got moved to somewhere completely different (where it made no sense). Changing the figures in other people's comments is also rude. I know this is a a very controversial issue but this is out of order. Thanks. Secretlondon 12:46, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Editing other people's comments

message: Could someone please spell out FURG?  I know FU = Fair Use. YechielMan 07:34, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, never mind.  WP:FURG.  But maybe this noticeboard should be renamed Fair Use. YechielMan 00:50, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:WTF]]? 

message: Does it have a different purpose than the talk at Wikipedia_talk:Non-free content? Sancho 05:43, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is this noticeboard for?
Talk:Swashbuckler film

message: :Swashbuckler films → Swashbuckler film — Genre articles should be in the single tense. BOVINEBOY2008 14:35, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: The general more realistic and often gritty atmosphere of Bernard Cornwell's work, both in print and the TV-adaptations (Sharpe, The Last Kingdom) does not really fit with the more lighthearted tone in most Swashbuckler fiction. I therefore suggest its removal from the list of TV-series on this page  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.176.213.7 (talk) 16:12, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion to Remove Sharpe from list of TV series 

message: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wuxia
possibly in the "See also" section ?
Noliscient (talk) 01:38, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion to establish some connection with the Chines Wuxia genre
Talk:Radical democracy

message: "Radical democracy can be defined as "a type of democracy that signals an ongoing concern with the radical extension of equality and liberty".[1] Radical democracy is concerned with a radical extension of equality and freedom. Another feature is the idea that democracy is an un-finished, inclusive, continuous and reflexive process.[1]" Considering that 'liberty' (like slavery for instance) usually comes at the expense of equality and democracy. Also, liberty and freedom are not the same. 83.84.100.133 (talk) 05:45, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Liberty? 

message: The opening line should be removed amended. Use of the ideology here is misleading. As a former student of Ernesto Laclau, I very much doubt he would have defined radical democracy as an ideology  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.134.18.105 (talk) 14:54, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Radical democracy is NOT an ideology as Laclau and Mouffe understand the term 

message: - First of all, the most recent source is from 2005. Since this dates back to already 14 years ago the information stated at the sub-heading ¨re-interpretations¨ is a bit outdated. New (and relevant) intepretations have emerged and are thus important to include in the sub-heading. After all, without these new interpretations that emerged along with modern phenomena the page does not give an complete overview of the concept. 
- Second, the sub-heading ¨challenges¨ is based on only one source and is thus not fully inclusive and one-sided. This sub-heading should be amended by adding new and more criticisms on the theory. 
- Third, the sub-heading ¨theorists¨ refers only to the names of the theorist, but does not give any explanation why these theorists are associated with the theory of radical democracy. Also, more important theorists are associated with radical democracy, like Habermas and Foucault for example.
- Lastly, the existence of a distinction between post-marxist theory and radical democracy is not made clear in this article. The sentence ¨In other contexts, radical democracy is a term used to refer to the post-Marxist perspectives of Italian radicalism—especially Paolo Virno.¨ is vague and should therefore be amended and elaborated. 
(DHTStudentUVA (talk) 20:47, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some suggestions for improvement