Talk:Shoney's

message: I remember hearing on the news about Shoney's getting in trouble in the Southern United States in the early 1990's for racial discrimination. Among the things I remember from the report were applicants for employment had their job applications flagged if they were black by placing a small dot inside the "o" of the Shoney's logo, and a case where a manager hired black employees and then hid them in a closet when the district manager made a surprise visit to his restaurant.
There seems to be mention about it on the net. The case was filed in 1989 in Florida:
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m3190/is_n46_v26/ai_12904979
http://www.fundinguniverse.com/company-histories/Shoneys-Inc-Company-History.html
Shouldn't this be mentioned in the article? -Artificial Silence 14:12, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Racial discrimination case?

message: :Image:Shoneys logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 15:34, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Shoneys logo.jpg

message: There is no mention of the Shoney's Inn concept which seems to have come and gone - just wondering if that would be article worthy (if anyone knows more about it...this is pretty much my depth of knowledge on the topic :)
And not just that - the template at the bottom of the article is for hotels, rather than restaurants.  This needs to be corrected. Just Below 39 (talk) 16:12, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: As far as I know, there are still two Shoney's hotels remaining Tatterfly (talk) 23:57, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shoney's Inn 

message: This article talk page was automatically added with  banner as it falls under :Category:Restaurants or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. You can find the related request for tagging here  -- TinucherianBot (talk) 11:06, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:FOOD]] Tagging

message: As noted on the article's page, this article has multiple issues. Some of these ar mentioned in eralier notes here on the talk page. I think some of the problems arise from the fact that a lot of the current article is really stale. I would like to elaborate, as well as add some more.  
Besides lacking any inline or even general references, the biggest single flaw I see is that the current Shoney's brandname and restaurants are under a relatively new ownership group. That fact is very poorly presented, and in someways, is misrepresented. Almost everything else, both written and missing, is historical in nature, and pertains to the companies and their leaders that previously operated under the Shoney's banner. Both Alex Shoenbaum and Raymond L. Danner Sr. are now dead, and ahve not been involved for years. Danner bears major responsibility for the past history of racial discrimination of employees. It is wrong that we not include that subject, but it is also important that we make it very clear that a different company and management was involved than the current company operating what the public knows as Shoney's. 
It is my intention to work on the above, and welcome any suggestions, sources, and collaboration. Vaoverland (talk) 09:12, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Major rewrite

message: 1. The Parkette became a Big Boy franchisee in February 1952 (not 1951).
2. The contest and name change from Parkette to Shoney's occurred in 1954 (not 1953).
3. The contest excluded employees. The car was won by Paul Edens, a life insurance agent.
The above is misreported even on shoneys.com. See http://www.mywvhome.com/old/contest.htm or you can research it at newspaperarchive.com by searching big boy and limiting it to West Virginia papers and the years 1951-1954.
I think the year issue has to do with the franchise becoming effective February of 1952 which likely means it was signed in 1951. So I suppose Shoney's can technically say the franchise was acquired in 1951, but it is misleading as people think that's when Parkette/Shoney's became a francisee. The contest and name change occurred two years later hence the year error occurred again.
I have no idea where the mistaken claim of the employee contest comes from though I've seen it repeated many times including an interview with Schoenbaum's widow available online. The article All American Tradition http://www.wvliving.com/Spring-2012/All-American-Tradition/ nonetheless might be added as a good outside reference.
— Box73 (talk) 07:52, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong Years for Big Boy Franchise & Name Change; Not Employee Contest 

message: Copied this from WikiProject Companies. This is where the discussion should take place: --CNMall41 (talk) 23:42, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: How Much Criticism Is Too Much?