lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Saddle roof

message: I've uploaded an svg image is this of sufficient quality to replace the current jpg one?
AndrewHarvey4 (talk) 23:35, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: *Looks OK to me. Newell Post (talk) 00:39, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: I see that several articles use the phrase "saddle roof"
to describe something other than the hyperbolic paraboloid shown in this article.
Articles including
Dritt Mansion,
Capernaum Church,
St Joseph's Roman Catholic Church, Leigh,
Franklin House (Athens, Georgia),
Oostum, and
Rittergut Kürbitz
seem to show a roof composed entirely of flat planes.
I suspect this form may be the most common referent of the phrase "saddle roof",
and so (in accordance with WP:COMMONNAME) this article should at least mention it.
Other articles including Batak architecture and Architecture of Indonesia
seem to use "saddle roof" to describe a curved shape with a sharp ridgeline
that is clearly not a hyperbolic paraboloid.
Is there some other article(s) that discuss these other kinds of "saddle roof"?
Are there other words or phrases that are used to distinguish these
(at least) 3 kinds of saddle roof?
How can we improve this "saddle roof" article by mentioning these other kinds of saddle roof?
--DavidCary (talk) 01:58, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  other kinds of saddle roof 

message: The Saddledome article mentions
"The roof of the building was designed to be a reverse hyperbolic paraboloid".
How is that any different than any other hyperbolic paraboloid?
--DavidCary (talk) 02:05, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  reverse hyperbolic paraboloid 

message: thumb|File:Wiesen Ansitz Wiesenheim 01.JPG
I have removed this image because I am quite sure that the user who put it there confused the English term "saddle roof" with the German term "Satteldach", which means "gable roof". The tower that the caption referred to definitely has a gable roof, not a saddle roof. Kelisi (talk) 04:49, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  File:Wiesen Ansitz Wiesenheim 01.JPG
Talk:Dahlgren, Virginia

message: It would be nice to list the approximate employment of the Naval Base, as it is a major employer for the area.  Other major employers should also be noted, such as Lockheed-Martin, Northrup-Grumman, SAIC etc., if the data is available.--Asacan 14:32, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Employment

message: Lots of info here on the Navy base, but how about the town?  When was it founded? Who is the mayor? 71.171.89.90 (talk) 23:07, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  The town? 

message: I just added the 2010 demo numbers to the top paragraph after the ToC, but I think all the other numbers are probably 2000 as well.  I am not about to try to run those down.108.28.23.254 (talk) 14:50, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  2010 vs 2000 Numbers 

message: Kiersten Sierra Leone Washington a local Dahlgren Virginia model recently made the cover of Katwalk Fashion Magazine Issue number 36, May 2021. Kennedy2319 (talk) 01:06, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Local Dahlgren Virginia native Kiersten Sierra Leone Washington
Talk:Dale City, Virginia

message: PWSI 
link title
TODAY 20.000 KIDS playing soccer in Dale City
Other teams near Dale city:
NVSC,NOVARLS,OCCOQUAN SC,GIANT 101  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Angel96 (talk • contribs) 01:11, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Soccer 

message: What year did the development begin? Son of Somebody (talk) 06:31, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  History Section 

message: Anyone have any idea why K got used twice, when every other letter only got used once? CsikosLo (talk) 16:54, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  K K 
Talk:Scombroid food poisoning

message: I support the proposed merge. --Arcadian 04:09, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merge

message: The article states many facts that are not in anyway referenced by citations.  For example there is a direct statement in regards to sufferers of Asthma and their symptoms that is completely unreferenced.  Suggests editors cite these statements to peer reviewed sources.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Murphyryan1 (talk • contribs) 09:13, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of references
Talk:Thomas Brooke Jr.

message: There are a few problems in the Ancestry section. Stevenbeall (talk) 23:00, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typos 

message: What an absolute wreck of a Wikipedia entry 174.103.150.117 (talk) 23:08, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Put a "Condemned" sign on this post
Talk:Never Not Funny

message: Does anyone think that a different approach to listing the guests/episodes could work better? It's impractical for finding recent episodes and I think people rarely look for people by name but rather browse and if a name pops out they'll focus on it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.50.101.153 (talk) 01:10, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

message: What was the exact reason for him being thrown out? Is there any solid rumour about this? I could not find anything on the internets.
He and Jimmy had a general disagreement about Mike's attitude, which Jimmy and Mike explained to the audience separately. (Mike explained it on his blog. I am going to include that as a link right now.) - Scryptographyk
Now when exactly does the podcast drop? Thursday Night or Friday Morn.
A: It almost always drops Thursday night, around 11pm or midnight.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.254.3.74 (talk) 09:11, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reason for Mike Schmidt being thrown out? 

message: *Never Not Funny (season 1)
*Never Not Funny (season 2)
*Never Not Funny (season 3)
*Never Not Funny (season 4)
*Never Not Funny (season 5)
*Never Not Funny (season 6)
*Never Not Funny (Season 7)
*Never Not Funny (season 8)
*Never Not Funny (season 9)
*Never Not Funny (season 10)
*Never Not Funny (season 11)
*Never Not Funny Primo Bonus Episodes
*Never Not Funny: Volume One
While the AfD in 2010 resulted in no consensus, the suggested suggestion was to merge.
These season sub articles have no hope of gaining independent references, and are essentially tables listing episode number, date, and title - information that is readily available on the podcast feed or primary website. These lists are unmaintainable listcruft that is only of interest to hardcore NNF fans. --Breno talk 03:08, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge sub articles into main article 
Talk:Ricardo Wolf

message: Ricardo Wolf was a great philanthropist. I have a great respect for him. I created the article 'Ricardo Wolf' on July 16, 2007. You can improve this article. RS1900 04:28, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ricardo Wolf

message: Which reads: "...a Jewish-German-Cuban-Israeli...".
As "Jew" isn't a nationality but an ethnicity, It should definitely read ".. a Jewish German-Cuban-Israeli.." with a space between his ethinicity and his many nationalities.
YonatanOfek  — Preceding unsigned comment added by יונתן אופק (talk • contribs) 17:48, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: A note about his nationality
Talk:Lechaim

message: Lechaim is in an jewish toast, like German Prosit or Russian Na zdorovje. I'm not sure if it comes from the jewish or jiddish language, but it's very common between jews and people with jewisch roots, in all social groups.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.226.143.157 (talk) 19:16, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Toast 
Talk:Kaczynski

message: All the Kaczyńskis are also listed under Kaczynski, which is just the latinized variant, not a different name. Should be merged. I didn't because User:Frigglinn undid a redirect in January, so you guys sort it out.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by  87.162.26.224 (talk • contribs) 
:see Talk:Kaczynski#Merge. --Austrian 22:02, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge? 
Talk:Jewish Currents

message: This magazine is part of the Jewish Secular Cultural movement.  It is not tied to religion or beliefs in god.  Therefore I have changed back the stub from religious to cultural. Mkrupnic (talk) 17:48, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Religion vs. Culture 

message: About 3 weeks ago (circa "20:39, 17 April 2021") this change was made. 
In some ways that was a good change. It broke an extremely long sentence into two shorter sentences. (It also made at least one other change, in the last sentence before the "See also" section; but that is outside the scope of this "Talk:" page comment section.)  
The part that used to say "until 1956 when it broke with the party and took its current name." was changed to say "In 1956 when it broke with the party and took its current name." 
The use of "In" to replace "until" was fine; it fits in well with inserting a "sentence" boundary right before this part of that paragraph. However, it was probably not intentional -- (and IMHO it was not correct) -- to leave in the word "when" there (after "In 1956"). 
There are other ways that this paragraph could be fixed ... that is, other than just removing (deleting) the word "when". However, that [deletion of that word] is probably the best and simplest solution. Discussion of any "other" solutions is possible, but [a] it would made this "Talk:" page comment section even more long-winded, and [b] it is probably not necessary. 
Unless I hear (or see) some convincing reason[s] to fix this paragraph some other way (other than by deleting the word "when"), I intend to delete the word "when". 
Even if some comments are added here, after that -- [deleting the word "when"] -- happens, it is OK. Once a change is made, it can still be overridden by a later change. 
Thanks for your patience. --Mike Schwartz (talk) 17:08, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point. Works for me. Freelance-frank (talk) 18:24, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: DONE.  --Mike Schwartz (talk) 21:05, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  the "Revision as of 20:39, 17 April 2021" left in the word "when" (by mistake?)  

message: The NYT just published a profile of Jewish Currents: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/30/style/arielle-angel-jewish-currents-magazine.html. I have a very mild COI, so I'll hold off editing directly to incorporate it, but just dropping here for anyone who might want to do so. (pinging  as this seems in your wheelhouse as a journalism/Judaism combo)
Cheers,  talk 16:16, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''NYT'' profile
Talk:Moment (magazine)

message: Hello, 
There are currently three issues on the moment page. The first is that it is outdated, the second is that it relies too much on references to primary sources, and the third is that a major contributor to the article has a close connection with its subject. 
It seems clear to me that to fix the fact that the article relies to much on primary sources, new sources need to be found and added. I was wondering if anyone had any advice on what needs to be fixed in order to remove the tag saying that a contributor has a close connection? If I verify that the content that was added by the contributor is all accurate, can I remove it then? And in terms of it being outdated, I have checked and it seems as though all the content is still relevant thats on the page, so I think it's time to delete that tag. 
I'd love to hear people's thoughts on this!
Thanks! 
Liat  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Liatdc (talk • contribs) 22:48, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fixing Issues on the page 
Talk:Jewish Telegraphic Agency

message: Jewish Daily Bulletin is redirected here. However, there's not a single mention of the JDB in the article! Worse even, according to the LoC (here), the "Jewish Daily Bulletin" was published by its own company, Jewish Daily Bulletin Co. of New York, between 1924-1935. So at the very least, a different legal entity. The JTA website has an article, "The Jewish Daily Bulletin, Smallest Yet Most Effective Newspaper", where the JDB is described as an "achievement" of the JTA, established in 1924 by the same person, Jacob Landau, who was the founder and mgr of the JTA (on his page there's no mention of the DJB either!), but edited by Abraham Abrahams. So the two are distinct to quite a degree, which is also logical: a relatively large news agency must be distinct from a small newspaper, even if the latter only uses material delivered by the former (did it?). Needs fixing. Arminden (talk) 16:51, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jewish Daily Bulletin
Talk:World of Padman

message: Remember - Don't make it sound like an advertisement! --ALIENDUDE5300 04:38, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Hello! Project/WP:H!P and the use of non-free images on Wikipedia

message: :Even if these photos were "free images", I don't think that, for example, Berryz Koubou would be fairly represented by either this image of a 30-year-old man presenting flowers to 15-year-old Momoko Tsugunaga (while the rest of the band is going "Awwww!")
Maybe not the most ideal, but still one that's regarded as useful and still used.  See Anna Nicole Smith (discussion), Jon Stewart (dicussion), Ken Kutaragi, and Shigeru Miyamoto (discussion), for instance.  For the Miyamoto image, people complained because they thought that him in a conductor suit didn't represent him as a game designer (the previous fair use image had been him surroundeed by video game character dolls).  If it was possible I'm sure nobody would object.
Also, since this is a subpage, you could just move it to Wikipedia:WikiProject Hello! Project/Use of non-free images on Wikipedia hbdragon88 04:52, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: And that's one reason why Wikipedia is going down the toilet. The quality is suffering beyond belief because of arcane rules set by the WikiFoundation that have no basis in reality, legal or otherwise. -- CJ Marsicano 14:04, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Wikipedia talk:Assume good wraith

message: I shall watch this page... and contribute to it as well... for it is awesome. ----HAL2008TK CT 04:57, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: I love it

message: What's next, Wikipedia:Assume wood faith? Tree deities I tell you. Tyciol (talk) 07:51, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Best. Article. Idea. Ever. 79.112.55.97 (talk) 09:20, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Awesome

message: I'm sure some of our most devoted contributors (myself included) would gladly continue contributing post-mortem if permitted. Perhaps some already do? In that case, you can assume good faith and assume good wraith!!! :) Cheers! Wilhelmina Will (talk) 18:51, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  AGW ''could'' actually be applied to Wikipedia. 

message: Ghosts are evil soul eaters! 79.112.55.97 (talk) 09:20, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: necropost, but no they are very kind!!! Soulware2 (talk) 14:27, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assume bad Wraith 

message: so okay in theory this could have been a funny joke. the main pun at the heart of it is good! but the execution here is just garbage. the title is the only funny part, which wouldn't actually matter if the rest of the article wasn't full of attempts at comedy. ideally, this article would be imitating the tone of an actual wikipedia policy instead of like. whatever is going on here. because I cannot stress this enough every single joke in this article falls flat except for the one in the title, which is really good.jan Misali (talk) 06:29, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  I have strong opinions on this.
Talk:Random multinomial logit

message: The page reads like the paper's authors trying to drumm up interest in their own work. The method has no real traction and is not noteworthy. It's one of a million other tiny variations on a theme that you'll find in the literature.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.247.250.46 (talk) 19:42, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: stuff
Talk:Child and Dependent Care Credit

message: I don't think this page should be deleted because it provides valuable information to people looking to find information about taxes online.  It has over 53,000 results in google, and there are many other examples of IRS credits having articles on Wikipedia.--Bibo58 04:58, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: And I removed the speedy deletion tag, but this article really needs to be developed if it's going to avoid AfD.  Surely there's more to say on the subject than this, and sources of information that could be cited? -FisherQueen (Talk) 11:10, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article is neatly done, with sources and good detail... unfortunately, it addresses the topic only from the immediate tax payer's perspective.  It doesn't explain how much the credit reduces total tax revenue, what series of events led for it to be proposed, who supported and opposed, or why it is mentioned in Obama's change.gov agenda.  Also, Wikipedia style guidelines discourage Ibid./Id. citations - instead, name a reference in the first reference tag ("ref name=YourChosenTitle"), and then successive mentions are cited "ref name=YourChosenTitle /" with no citation information and no closing "/ref" tag.  Mike Serfas (talk) 06:02, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment for [[WP:WikiProject Barack Obama]]
Talk:Emory-Meadowview, Virginia

message: There should be two different pages for these two towns.  Any objections? Rutke421 (talk) 18:56, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Rolling block

message: This is a topic for Action (firearms) and should be merged into it.Digitallymade (talk) 12:19, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggesting merge into Action (firearms) 

message: A rolling block is a generic action description, which is why the article title doesn't have it capped.  And when it's used as a compound modifier, e.g before rifle or action or design, it would typically be hyphenated, to clue the user to read it as a unit (i..e. not the default non-hyphenated parse of rolling block rifle as a block rifle that is rolling).  But when I made such fixes, I got reverted by an IP whose expertise is deep, I'm sure, in antique firearms, but perhaps not so deep in grammar and style.  Per MOS:CAPS and MOS:HYPHEN, we should really be fixing these.  Other ideas?  Dicklyon (talk) 02:41, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: With hyphenated "rolling-block" as adjective before system, breech, action, design, mechanism, invention, etc., here are a few in books: , , , , (p.136), , , , .  Dicklyon (talk) 22:11, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

text: Thanks!  I'll have a look. Dicklyon (talk) 23:30, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

text: I made some more changes.  Take a look.  In particular, I can't agree that "Remington Rolling Block" is a model; rather it's a "family" that includes many models, different calibers, over quite a few years. And the name "Rolling Block" (capped) seems to have come in long after they were antiques, so it's a family named by historians, not by Remington, who used the name "Remington System".  We should include that some place.  I've left "Remington Rolling Block" in a lot of places, but not where it modified "action" and such.  Dicklyon (talk) 00:02, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Case and hyphen
Talk:Halstead's Bay

message: What is Mound's Highland geography?  Is that a general term, perhaps related to Effigy mounds, or was it caused by glacial moraines or an ancient river valley?--Appraiser 17:39, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What I am trying to write is that there are bluffs and hills along parts of the lakeshore. Mound has a neighborhood that starts east of the bay called, the Highlands. Other local high places are Saint Boni where one can see the IDS tower, and the old Nike Base north of there. I am all for simplicity, and improving the article. Perhaps it should be deleted until I know more of what I wrote. The mounds for which Mound is named, is another article or sub article that needs to be written. Nanabozho 17:22, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've worked on some of the effigy mound articles; they're listed in :Category:Mound builders and some are in the list at Indian Mounds Park.  But I think the bluffs in Mound are probably from glacial melt erosion, like Glacial River Warren (the valley now followed by the Minnesota River).--Appraiser 17:39, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Geography
Talk:Jones–Shafroth Act

message: An editor on this article has repeatedly edited it to take out references to the "Jones Act" as another name for this statute, and eliminated disambiguation between this Jones Act, Jones Act (Philippines), and Jones Act (a better-known statute governing shipping). I appreciate his desire to minimize confusion between this 1917 statute governing Puerto Rico and the Jones Act of 1920 governing maritime matters. However, the Puerto Rico statute is referred to frequently, in the literature and by courts, as the "Jones Act" as well as as the "Jones-Shafroth Act." It is very desirable to minimize any confusion among these statutes, but I think the effort to eliminate any use of the term "Jones Act" at all from this article may be taking things a bit too far. This editor hasn't responded to a note I left on his talk regarding this so I'd appreciate input from other editors here before I consider whether to revert again. Newyorkbrad 21:16, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Introduction/disambiguation

message: Here's a question:  who were Jones and Shafroth?!98.170.194.117 (talk) 00:31, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This information is now included with citations. RevelationDirect (talk) 03:24, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  It would be nice
Talk:Dissociation (chemistry)

message: "The process is frequently confused with ionization."
Okay, but what is the difference? Eleland 02:36, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ionization means formation of ions by any means. Yes, removal of electrons from a neutral molecule is ionization, but dissociation of an uncharged aqueous acid can also be described as ionization. For example, CH3COOH → H+ + CH3COO-, or more accurately CH3COOH + H2O → H3O+ + CH3COO-. See the article on Acid dissociation constant, which for neutral molecules is also known as Acid ionization constant. Dirac66 (talk) 02:50, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dissociation / Ionization 

message: I think this article needs a Simple English Wikipedia version of the article Dissociation. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 08:39, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need a Simple English Wikipedia
Talk:Intercalation (chemistry)

message: As  layman, this is difficult to grasp. I came here trying to learn about a word I had seen mentioned in discussion about li-ion batteries.
is this a correct explanation?:
Atoms have a natural distance between them. Some types of atoms have similar distances, which allow their matrices to slide together, like when you fold your fingers together. This meshing is useful for systems like lithium-ion batteries. Inside the batteries you want to ions to be able to move form one pole to the other.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.65.48.79 (talk) 12:15, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  layman's explanation? 

message: -- There is an excellent diagram of a molecule intercalated in DNA on the doxorubicin page. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doxorubicin). I don't know very much about editing wikipedia pages and was wondering if someone could add it to this page  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Robinatron (talk • contribs) 07:36, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Sorry this article is too narrow in scope- it has little about intercalation in inorganic compounds- e.g. I would expect to see refs to zeolites, clays, niobates, hydrous oxides, chevrel phases, tunnel structures, chalcogenides, acid phospahates, oxyhalides and loads more- its a big subject!  --Axiosaurus (talk) 14:14, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I you are knowledgeable then I would suggest that you add content to the article.  M stone (talk) 23:44, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

text: Yes. Materialscientist (talk) 11:25, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Downgraded this to stub

message: Should we rename and leave this title for intercalation in general ? Rod57 (talk) 15:36, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree we should split this article, perhaps into Intercalation (chemistry) and Intercalation (biochemistry).  --Smokefoot (talk) 14:35, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move/rename to DNA intercalation