Talk:Western State College of Law

message: It seems spurious to have a paragraph devoted to describing the parking lot of this law school. The paragraph seems to have been copied from text designed to discourage illegal parking at their facility. Per WP:BOLD (yet still searching for some consensus, not too bold) I shall consider removing it if I see no objections over the next few days.Retran (talk) 17:11, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Campus Access 

message: The "Teaching" section begins with an extremely unclear pronoun reference "These methods include much small group instruction." The rest of the paragraph seems to defy the WP:NEU neutral point of view encyclopedic style, as it seems copied from promotional text of some sort. The descriptions of teaching are so vague it could be referring to any school and any type of teaching. Does anyone have specific information on what teaching method of law Western State emphasizes in their courses??(Socratic, hands-on, etc??) Retran (talk) 17:19, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:   Teaching 

message: In reverting a deletion for a WSUCL alum, I note the deleted name is for a California Superior Court judge.  Such individuals qualify for notability as state-wide WP:POLITICIANS.  E.g., they are judges of the Superior Courts of California.  Redlinking them is appropriate.  WTAF is an essay and not a guideline. Now perhaps the edit should have a cn tag, but that is a different issue. --S. Rich (talk) 01:53, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Great, I'll add a cn tag. I don't mind redlinked entries being there, except it's a lot more work- before the cn tag is removed, the notability needs to be confirmed and the attendance at WSUCL also needs to be confirmed. It's generally easier to create a stub with those cites, but it can be done here on a fairly clear notability item; it's the unclear ones that are harder to discuss without the stub. tedder (talk) 02:01, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable persons 

message: I've provided a cite to the ABA accreditation page.  Full accrediting is acceptable in that the ABA has "Provisional" and "Probationary" accrediation.  The term full may not be used by the ABA, but it is used by WSU.  Even though that cite is SPS, it is certainly reliable enough, and acceptable under SPS standards.--S. Rich (talk) 22:33, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't care about the full part, but it's the history in the sentence that still isn't cited. As it stands, the sentence says: "The American Bar Association accredited WSU in August 1998 and granted full accreditation in August 2009." The only thing that's cited it that it's accredited, even with your addition. There's actually a better cite from the ABA that shows that it was accredited in 2005 (not even mentioned in the sentence). See here. I am going to change the sentence to indicate that the school was accredited in 2005 and cite to the school's website and the ABA's.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:03, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  ABA accreditaiton 

message: I see the below bare URL banner on the top of this article, however there does not appear to be any bare URLs visible as part of the article text. Unless others have objections, I will plan to remove the banner in the coming days.
 Editchecker123 (talk) 09:25, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Generally, if you see a maintenance banner like that, and the issue appears to have been resolved, feel free to remove the banner. BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 19:20, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the explanation here, much appreciated. Editchecker123 (talk) 03:06, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bare URLs in article banner