Talk:Slavery in the Ottoman Empire

message: Slavery was common in the Ottoman empire, but a few things are not very clear in the article.
1 The Kapikulu were in reality captured prisoners of war or christian children who were enrolled in as Janissaries, but these were not ordinary slaves who worked in households, in the farms or industry, no they were military slaves. In fact they were not really slaves, but they were considered to be the servants and soldiers of the Sultan. They lived in barracks got monthly paid and could rise to important ranks. They were elite soldiers, and the normal population saw them ofcourse not as slaves, but in the end they always had to obey the Sultan, which was officially their masters, but in reality these Jannisaries also many times revolted against their master the Sultan. For increase of their payments, or they also intervened in the Ottoman politics. They became a state in the state and made many revolts against the Sultans who tried to reform them, they were also so powerfull they actually killed Sultan Osman II, Selim III and were finally destroyed by Sultan Mahmud II after they had tried to kill him too.
2 And about the numbers of Janissaries, they numbered between the 14th-15th centuries some 6.000 and most of them lived probably at least an average 20 years, they were elite soldiers, and had to complete years of training and they were never mend to be used as cannon fodder.
So actually there were not non stop christian children taken from their parents to become jannisary, no in reality it was very insignificant when it is remembered that the Ottomans ruled over at least 5 million christians in the same time.
3 Between the 15th-16th centuries the average number of janissaries was 12.000 an increase because the empire expanded, but when taken into consideration of the average life time of a janissary and the 6-7 million christian population this is not a big number.
And not all of these Janissaries were actually children taken by the devshirme it included prisoners of war, and there many wars in those ages.
4 The jannisaries got many new priviliges in the end of the 16th century such as they were allowed to marry and their children had the right to become janissary, before this it was all forbidden.
Finally when the Ottomans needed more soldiers in the end of the 16th centuries they allowed free born muslims and christians to enter the janissary corps, because they had a lack of manpower, after 1600 the taking of boys from christian families had practically stopped. Most of the Jannisarries then were actually sons of Janisarries and new recruits of freeborn muslim and christians.
So when there are 40,000 Janissaries in 1650, 90% of them are sons of Janissaries or new members, not persons taken as children. And in later centuries almost all of them.
5 The total number of Janissaries by Devshirme I estimate between 1370- and 1620 = 250 years.
(Average life after being taken to become a Janissary  I estimate as 20 years)
                                                                                    (average recruits in 1 year)
 Between 1370-1430 = 60 years, average 3,000 Janissary, 60/20 = 3    3 x 3,000   = 9,000         (150)
 Between 1430-1480 = 50 years, average 8,000 Janissary, 50/20 = 2,5  2,5 x 8,000 = 20,000        (300)
 Between 1480-1520 = 40 years, average 12,000 Janissary, 40/20 = 2   2 x 12,000  = 24,000        (500)
 Between 1520-1580 = 60 years, average 18,000 Janissary, 60/20 = 3   3 x 18,000  = 54,000        (750)
 Between 1580-1620* = 40 years, average 12,000 Janissary, 40/20 = 2   2 x 12,000 = 24,000        (500)
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Total number of Janissaries between 1370-1620 (250 years)                      131,000          (524)
  
 *excluding Janissaries from non Devshirme origin.
DragonTiger23 (talk) 11:36, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The article is a bit misleading and exaggerated. 

message: : A member of the Ottoman slave class, called a kul in Turkish, could achieve high status. Harem guards and janissaries are some of the better known positions a slave could hold, but slaves were actually at the forefront of Ottoman politics. The majority of officials in the Ottoman government were bought slaves, raised free, and integral to the success of the Ottomans from the fourteenth century to the nineteenth. By raising and specially training slaves as officials, they created administrators with intricate knowledge of government and fanatic loyalty, and cut corruption. As an administrator with no ties in the region, he would not favor one person over another when granting contracts.
There is no evidence of this at all; sounds like Ottoman fabrications. Anyone in the mood to delete this? 
-- Secondat of Orange (talk) 20:23, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: One more month and I'm going to remove this. -- Secondat of Orange (talk) 16:15, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The Cambridge World History of Slavery: The ancient Mediterranean world  pages 28-44 is a source that can be used to improve this. Sean.hoyland - talk 16:56, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  That book was amazing, thank you. -- Secondat of Orange (talk) 17:51, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bare Assertions and Lies 

message: User:Yozer has seen fit to remove referenced information under the guise of "Removed non-relevant content". I reverted asking, "explain how a group of individuals sold as slaves are irrelevant in an article titled "Slavery in the Ottoman Empire", instead of an answer Yozer quickly tries to make it personal stating, "Thanks for your bias Kansas Bear". I see nothing productive in Yozer's statement nor an explanation for the removal of references and referenced information. Such information will be restored. Continued remarks aimed at an editor and not content will be reported. --Kansas Bear (talk) 16:32, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of referenced information 

message: This article claims that "Slave boys were captured from the African Great Lakes region and other areas in Sudan like Darfur and Kordofan then sold to customers in Egypt.", and proceeds to provide two references for that claim. A look at the referenced books and pages shows no such information, however. The page clearly needs a proper rewrite from someone that knows what they are talking about. 114.134.3.152 (talk) 01:03, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: False references

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Slavery in the Ottoman Empire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.circassiancanada.com/tr/arastirma/osmanli_imparatorlugunda_kolelik.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110725220038/http://researchnews.osu.edu/archive/whtslav.htm to http://researchnews.osu.edu/archive/whtslav.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090218145519/http://www.todayszaman.com/tz-web/detaylar.do?load=detay&link=164554 to http://www.todayszaman.com/tz-web/detaylar.do?load=detay&link=164554
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120113000232/http://www.iudergi.com/tr/index.php/tarih/article/download/3733/3385 to http://www.iudergi.com/tr/index.php/tarih/article/download/3733/3385
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:02, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This article mentions Circassian slaves under the heading of Sexual Slavery, but passes over the Slavs who were the mainstay of the Crimean slave market for 800 years. Along with the mention of Roxelana on this page, there's a lot of good source material that is cited on the page for Tatar slave raids in East Slavic lands https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tatar_slave_raids_in_East_Slavic_lands
catseyes (talk) 14:50, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Circassian?

message: "customs statistics suggest that Istanbul's additional slave import from the Black Sea may have totaled around 2.5 million from 1450 to 1700."
The Ottoman Empire did not control Constantinople until 1453. Are we counting the slave imports of the Byzantine Empire as well,  in this statistic? Dimadick (talk) 07:00, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Three whole years out of 350? Really, that's your argument? 2A00:23C5:679F:A201:9542:6CAC:975B:7DAA (talk) 17:06, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Anachronism

message: Cariye seems to be a subset of this article. There is currently a merger discussion Talk:Cariye#Proposed merger of Jarya into Cariye but I wonder if its better to merge it with this one instead? VR talk 04:38, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I think perhaps not - primarily because the Ottoman empire was also awash with male slaves and eunuchs. Cariye should almost certainly be mentioned on this page, if not as the title of the title of the female slavery section than as a major term or sub-section, but I don't see there are being much to be gained from merging the content. Jarya/Cariye is useful to split out both as an etymological term and practice. Iskandar323 (talk) 06:44, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Cariye

message: — Assignment last updated by EmPatch (talk) 03:31, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Women and Gender in the Middle East