lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Sick Rose

message: Bad analysis! There are no "flies" - the worm flies in the night.
172.145.64.204 02:53, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

message: I removed the analysis section since it was unsourced POV and original research. I'll find some critical sources on the poem and try to write something more encyclopedic. I also changed the punctuation and capitalization so that it reflects the Erdman edition. Leoniceno (talk) 16:23, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed analysis section, revised the text  

message: The Sick Rose is a poem by William Blake. The poem mentions through the symbols of the rose and the worm, how intense experience preys upon unpolluted innocence. The first publication was in 1794, when it was included in his collection titled Songs of Experience as the 39th plate. The incipit of the poem is O Rose thou art sick. Blake composed the page sometime after 1789, and presents it with the illuminated border and illustrations that were typical of his self publications. Most aspects of the original production were undertaken by the author; the composition of the poem and design, engraving, and promotion of the work. The printing was usually done by Blake's wife, Catherine, as well as any colouring not performed by Blake himself. 103.242.198.199 (talk) 15:54, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tha sick rose
Talk:Emmanuel Lubezki

message: Need info on why his nickname is "Chivo" and what it means. I did an online translation and one site out of 3 gave me "I squel" (other two had nothing)  RoyBatty42 02:57, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Chivo just stands for male goat Solid Reign 02:07, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nickname

message: the page states that little princess was their first collaboration. This is wrong. Their first collaboration was "Sólo con tu pareja" 1991, directed by Cuaron, filmed and produced in Mexico.
Although in Hora Marcada http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0287856/ Cuaron was a writer, and he and Lubezki were cinematographers. It is not clear if they worked together in any of the episodes Dmgerman 19:33, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Apparently they did. The episode is "No retornable": http://www.cinematographers.nl/PaginasDoPh/lubezki.htm Dmgerman 19:36, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: First collaboration with Cuaron

message: The first sentence of the entry made a reference to the religion of his family. I believe this is not relevant at such point in the entry. In any case, and if somebody objects, it should be moved to a "personal life" section, which currently does not exist.Dmgerman 22:32, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not a religion. It's a race.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 177.205.162.142 (talk) 02:23, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Family's religion
Talk:Hirabah

message: This entry is evidently neither written in descriptive language, nor from a neutral viewpoint. I believe it should be flagged accordingbly respective should be deleted in its entirety...!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.132.184.46 (talk) 18:11, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality? 
Talk:Lil Star

message: Can anyone answer a question for me? Is Cee-Lo on the version of this song that appears on the album, or just on the "single" release?
I couldn't hear his voice on the sample of this song that I heard on iTunes, and the way that this article is worded almost makes it seem like he's just on the single/radio edit. Please clarify, if you can. Thanks! NickBurns 03:02, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Album version vs single
Talk:United States Army Aviation Branch

message: The history section has been expanded since I last saw the article in 2010. Some of the edit comments suggest a source, and I will be looking to verify and clean up difficult language that may be the result of cut and paste(?). I just don't know when. So, if someone gets to it before me, that should take care of the citation problem right now.--Born2flie (talk) 21:14, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: hello
thanks for your hard work describing army aviation. every wikipedia article on airlines has fleet info. where is army aviation fleet info? what is it made of? i found a page that just lists the units. doesn't tell what kit they use. please for consistency sake, let's build a table of equipment?  make it look like the airliner articles? 
i bet french army light aviation has a equipment listing... :D
thanks again  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.255.50.22 (talk) 19:48, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Is this what you're looking for? I've added this link to the "See also" section of this page.  - wolf 21:27, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  why don't you have fleet details? link to fleet details?
Talk:USS Missouri (SSN-780)

message: You took out a section on this stub article and now have mixed history with current. Something that happened on 26 January 2018 could be considered recent "history" but if the submarine is now stationed at the port it is "current" information. I get a little confused when a stub article seems to be under some "protection" when added content certainly can't harm the article. Is there a concern with just keeping the articles as stubs? Otr500 (talk) 07:51, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: This has nothing to do with being a stub or being under any kind of protection. There is just no need for that sub-heading or section. Basically, everything that happens during the service life of a ship or boat is part of It's "history". Only the most recent event would be considered current, and that's only while it is actually "current" or actively occurring. If you look at other ship article's they don't, or shouldn't, have a "current" section. It would have to be moved everytime there is a new entry. Besides, all entries are dated, making such a section/sub-heading redundant. Please note the other corrections I made to your edit as well. Thanks - theWOLFchild 16:02, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article improvements
Talk:Bushy Run Battlefield

message: On 4 March 2009, the Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission (PHMC) released a study of its 22 museums and historic sites, here: "Planning Our Future: Sustainability Committee Final Report". It recommended discontinuing operations at six of its sites, four of which are National Historic Landmarks. Proposed cuts to the PHMC budget mean these sites could close as early as July 1, 2009:
*Brandywine Battlefield (NHL)
*Bushy Run Battlefield (NHL)
*Conrad Weiser House (NHL)
*Fort Pitt Museum 
*Joseph Priestley House (NHL)
*US Brig Niagara (museum ship)
Contact information for the Governor and Director of the PHMC are here for anyone interested in commenting on the proposal. Ruhrfisch  ><>°° 04:13, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed closure
Talk:Pennsbury Manor

message: This is a common artifact of the ZIP code system: certain town names become arbitrarily assigned to their entire surrounding areas. I am going to change "in" to "near". Please do not revert this based on the simplistic reason that "the mailing address says "Morrisville". Thanks. — Lumbercutter 18:31, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is in Morrisville, just not the borough of Morrisville.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.54.94.49 (talk) 01:54, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, no, it is in Falls Township. Anything not in the borough of Morrisville isn't in Morrisville, although as mentioned above, the ZIP code system has led people not to understand how that works. The people who designed the system screwed up that aspect of it by forcing addresses in a township to include in their mailing address the name of the local post office where their mail is routed through, even if it is in (and thus named for) a neighboring town. The city names tied to ZIP codes often do not correspond to municipal boundaries. PhilaRegion1062 (talk) 23:03, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: The ZIP code gives it a mailing address of Morrisville, but it isn't "in" Morrisville

message: Thanks, Dincher—you are correct that it is not a state park. Both Google Maps and a paper map that I have label the area "Pennsbury Manor State Park", but PA DCNR's website does not list it as one. Maybe it used to be one (?), but currently it is clearly a Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission site. — Lumbercutter 19:45, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The List of Pennsylvania state parks shows loads of info about current and former Pennsylvania state parks. Dincher 20:11, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Google Maps says "Pennsbury Manor State Park", but it's not a state park

message: As none of the manor house was left and the site had to be found, it was reconstructed, not restored. Need dates, cost, donees, etc. for this effort. Parkwells (talk) 17:24, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Need additions about reconstruction
Talk:Deadlee

message: I rated this as just about reaching C class. Further improvement would require more (at least some) information about his non-working life. I notice that the text is also very similar to one of the sources - this needs to be changed (even if the original author doesn't mind it being copied, the source is not public domain, it has a copyright symbol).YobMod 08:05, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Rating comments
Talk:Pope Boniface II

message: "He is the first pope not to be canonized as a saint."  That would be Liberius.  I'm removing this information.131.187.254.7 16:28, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ave Maria University

message: *
*
* First appearance of "Catholic Jonestown" as a pejorative against Ave Maria. Frequently quoted afterward.
Binksternet (talk) 20:49, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible sources 

message: This citation was removed. 
Dissertations may not be interesting, but this 2020 doctoral dissertation, “A Historical Narrative on the Formative Years and Organizational Culture of Ave Maria University: 2003 to 2011,” conducted at the College of William and Mary in Virginia examined how a new, conservative Catholic university emerged in the United States at the beginning of the 21st century.
It provides foundational documents. 
Moran, Patricia Lourdes. “A Historical Narrative on the Formative Years and Organizational Culture of Ave Maria University: 2003 to 2011.” College of William and Mary in Virginia. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, 2020.
Not arguing to keep, just my observation that it does provide information.Kmccook (talk) 01:53, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: A Historical Narrative on the Formative Years and Organizational Culture of Ave Maria University: 2003 to 2011
Talk:Unlimited EP

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure)  ■ ∃ Madeline ⇔ ∃ Part of me ; 22:26, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Unlimited (EP) →  – Per WP:EPDAB. In 2014, an editor moved this article to the current title without discussion, saying, "doesn't appear to be part of title"  (diff). However, many third-party reliable sources (AllMusic, HipHopDX, Pitchfork, RapReviews), the record label (Rhymesayers Entertainment), and the EP's cover art (:File:Soulpositionep.jpeg) call it Unlimited EP. In this case, "EP" is itself part of the title. For similar cases, see Girl/Boy EP and Slim Shady EP. 2400:4050:C222:B700:4D05:20C1:F9B7:29BE (talk) 02:42, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 16 October 2022
Talk:Pope Theodore I

message: Is he a Latin saint as well?  i can't find it anywhere. --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 01:25, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Latin saint? 

message: Pope Theodore I is not venerated in the Roman Church.  He is nowhere listed in the Roman Martyrology: http://www.boston-catholic-journal.com/roman-martyrology-complete-in-english-for-daily-reflection.htm.  Despite what the Wikipedia page says, he is not venerated in the Eastern churches, either, since he has no feast day.  According to the link, it seems like some Greek Orthodox parish (?) has him listed as a saint.  Otherwise, there is just no history of a cultus for him, though he did seem like a holy man.Mwidunn (talk) 08:11, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  No 

message: "Greek inhabitant", "among the many Syrian clergy".  so was he Greek or Syrian? --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 15:24, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  ethnic origin? 

message: He was a Greek who was born in PalestineMwidunn (talk) 07:26, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greek Palestinian
Talk:PS Mitra Kukar

message: I'm not in a position to expand the article. But I believe this is a first division soccer team in Indonesia. And I think it's generally accepted that professional teams playing within the top few tiers of their national league system are considered notable enough for Wikipedia. 218.186.9.1 03:30, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Cypher in the Snow

message: Is there a link between the group and the story/film Cipher in the Snow? Uriel-238 (talk) 10:23, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Pope Sisinnius

message: I've decided to keep tabs on this article now that  has successfully brought it to GA status. I see they intend to bring it to FA status (with a peer review along the way!). Since I'm not at that level of expertise yet, I'm going to simply offer additional sources and descriptions of their utility when I encounter them. The first of these is "The Papacy and Byzantium in the Seventh- and Early Eighth-Century Sections of the Liber Pontificalis" by Rosamond McKitterick (accessible at ). Page 256 references Sisinnius's entry in the Liber Pontificalis as "Life 89" and notes that the length of the vacancy following his death is recorded, a fact not currently mentioned in the article. It's minor, but it's something. ~ Pbritti (talk) 22:00, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional sources that might be useful
Talk:Pope John VII

message: I have not come across any references to John VII's Calabrian origins. I would assume Constantinople is more likely due to his father's imperial connections. However I do not have any concrete reference to this, and don't believe one exists. Can anyone provide a reference to support or discount the Calabrian origins?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Applecart (talk • contribs) 13:58, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origins
Talk:USS Baton Rouge

message: This article at BBC says that the Russian sub was surfacing.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/7892294.stm
Does anyone have any info as to why Kremer was relieved?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Labodeng (talk • contribs) 18:04, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Cuz crashing into shit when you're supposed to be playing sneaky surveillance in hostile waters ranks quite high on the idiocy scale. Aadieu (talk) 23:19, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: BBC Mention

message: https://www.mk.ru/politics/2023/04/05/kapitan-igor-lokot-rasskazal-o-stolknovenii-s-podvodnoy-lodkoy-ssha.html   212.154.212.150 (talk) 23:59, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  info rus
Talk:USS Memphis (SSN-691)

message: I've removed the rambling conspiracy section with a short summary, and redirected users to the page fully covering the incident. I think its enough for readers to know there was a sub that sank, the Memphis was there, and some fringe groups accuse it of being responsible. The actual page has real detail and better vetting.
Dtolman (talk) 20:47, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've expanded that section somewhat, but in what I hope is a balanced way that is somewhat more self-sustaining than a blurb. --Dynaflow babble 04:53, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Conspiracy Theories - really needed?
Talk:Pope John VI

message: In an English article about Pope John VI we read:
:During his reign, he assisted the Exarch Theophylactos, who had been sent to Italy by the emperor Justinian II, and prevented him from using violence against the Romans. John VI's interventions prevented Theophylactos from being injured, having come to Rome to "cause trouble for the pontiff".Ekonomou, 2007, p. 270.
I think, that emperor was not Justinian II, but Tiberius III (II) Apsimar, who reigned under the name of Tiberius until deposed by Justinian II in 705 and executed in February 706.
Justinian II "the Slit-nosed" governed (once more) from August 705 – December 711. Pope John VI however died 11 January 705.M. Benedik: Papeži od Petra do Janeza Pavla II., Mohorjeva družba Celje  1989. Page 69.--Stebunik (talk) 20:17, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which emperor
Talk:Faerie Queen (song)

message: Can someone cite the LGBT content in this song?  It appears to be a simple "Devil Went Down to Georgia" remake, with two women competing over a man; I'm not seeing it.  
Link to lyrics 
CrashCart9 (talk) 01:08, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It appears to be related to "Heather Alexander," the musical artist, who is apparently L, G, B, or T.  Surely there is a more appropriate (read: specific, informative) category for the song, which in itself doesn't appear to be LGBT-related. 168.9.120.8 (talk) 20:34, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes it seems so, her wiki article says she was born male--98.150.22.136 (talk) 07:35, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  LGBT Content?
Talk:USS Cincinnati (SSN-693)

message: In the third paragraph it says the Cincinnati was visited by President Nixon and Admiral Rickover.  Richard Nixon resigned his presidency in 1974.  Not sure what was intended here. Just sayin.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:981:4401:8DD0:FDFD:71C:56BB:B3EF (talk) 16:05, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  USS Cincinnati 1980
Talk:Pope John V

message: Good fundament have we for meaning, that Pope John V. did not begun his papacy on 12th July, but on 23th July 685. I show twoo totaliter different book and they have the same day, let yuo see: Metod Benedik: Papeži od Petra do Janeza Pavla II., Mohorjeva družba Celje  1989; page 68. Ferenc Chobot: A pápák története. Pátria, Rákospalota 1909; page 114.--Stebunik (talk) 20:46, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  When begun
Talk:USS Birmingham (SSN-695)

message: This edit in May 2006 added the bit about SSN-695 appearing in the film. Checking the DVD, there are no numbers visible. Additionally, the film does not thank individual ships, but instead thanks several US Pacific Fleet commanders and Submarine Group Five. These are all west coast units, Birmingham was not a west coast ship. (edit, I stand corrected on this item as Birmingham was stationed in Pearl Harbor in 1991.) USS Gary was the stand in for the FFG in the film and can be seen in one of the shots while the submarine is doing an emergency surface. Garys  command history report from 10 July 1989 states they were underway for the filming, off southern California having departed from Long Beach. USS Salt Lake City had VIP's on board relating to the film in March 1989, though that SLC was not in the area during filming in July 1989. Either way, the submarine in the film could not have been Birmingham. I believe this resulted in confusion with published photo linked with this text. Unfortunately this error has been in wikipedia for so many years that there are a few sources that took that and reprinted it as if it were true. The real submarine was likely in COMSUBGRU 5, and in the vicinity og Long Beach in July 1989.   --Dual Freq (talk) 21:39, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: USS Houston participated in filming the Hunt for Red October in May/June 1989. --Dual Freq (talk) 21:50, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Hunt for Red October 
Talk:ParticipACTION

message: Hal and Joanne (Body Break) are completely unaffiliated with ParticipACTION and haven't been affiliated with them since apprx 1991https://www.bodybreak.com/about/bb-story/ Moreover, because Body Break (standalone, without ParticipACTION) commercials continue to airhttps://bc.ctvnews.ca/the-body-break-duo-just-released-a-new-segment-on-physical-distancing-1.4874455 keeping the Body Break section within ParticipACTION will cause confusion for readers and misrepresents the current relationship between ParticipACTION and Body Break. Miguelito83 (talk) 21:11, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove Body Break from this page
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject European history/Collaboration

message: Since this project has only begun, I have chosen the Crimean War for the monthly collaboration. If by March there are enough members to discuss the topic, democracy would certainly be the preferable way to go. — Emiellaiendiay 23:55, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: February 2007

message: The current collaboration is Transylvania. Please discuss that article at its talk page. - Revolving Bugbear 13:30, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: January 2008

message: I have arbitrarily chosen Peloponnesian War as the collaboration for the month of October from the list of nominees, for lack of any discussion.--Doug.(talk • contribs) 03:39, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: October 2008
Talk:USS Jacksonville

message: I'm not sure the fire is notable. Fires occur onboard a ship (heck, in my home, in my kitchen) on a irregular basis, and usually are quickly contained, thanks to the professional level of training each sailor receives. I would consider it mentionable, if there was an external link to reference, providing the necessary level of notability. Otherwise, due to the common nature of these events, I imagine that this event's entry is a result of original research. --LeyteWolfer 17:18, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fire 

message: Jax was involved in two other collisions, in 1982 and 1984.  (With the accidents so close together, many sailors who were on board for the first were still there for the second, resulting in comments about the "Crash crew of '82 / Back for more in '84.")  Are these notable enough to be included? 208.47.164.226 (talk) 14:02, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Collisions 

message: According to a November 22nd tweet by @PacificSubs, Jacksonville was officially decommissioned November 16, 2021. 71.210.57.178 (talk) 05:36, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: - wolf 09:11, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

text: Here is an archive of the decommissioning article - http://web.archive.org/web/20230709235127/https://www.dvidshub.net/news/409640/uss-jacksonville-ssn-699-decommissioned 174.60.13.240 (talk) 23:54, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Decommissioned
Talk:Roman Catholic Diocese of St. Augustine

message: Greetings, Today, I removed the portal for Catholicism because it is are already included in the article's Navbox templates (in the below = parameter). This is per MOS/Layout, See_also_section which states that As a general rule, the "See also" section should not repeat links that appear in the article's body or its navigation boxes. In addition, I added portals for Christianity, Florida and History since these relate to the article. Regards, JoeHebda (talk) 05:06, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  See also section, Portal updates 

message: As of July 2021, this article was modified to eliminate the nondescript term "Roman Catholic" in favor of the more precise distinction of "Latin Church" (the sui iuris church) and "Catholic Church" (the denomination). If you believe this edit to be in error or improper, please make the relevant reversion and open discussion on this talk page or my personal talk page. Thank you. ~ Pbritti (talk) 04:14, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: July 2021 Latin Church revision