Talk:Knightmare Chess

message: #I'm considering dropping the stub tag. There is more that can be said, but how much detail is really appropriate? I don't want to step on SJG's propietary rights? 
#Specifically, would it be too much to list the different cards used? It seems to me that listing the cards & describing what they do could be a copyright violation. 
Ventifax 23:13, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I think the stub-tag can already be dropped. Just add whatever you think is appropriate, but I really think listing all cards with their descriptions would be too much. With the 160 cards there would be way too much too detailed information. I think it would get reverted with a reference to WP:NOT#IINFO. The copyvio point is probably also true, after all, you'd effectively just copy the whole work. --ZeroOne (talk | @) 16:05, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

text: I agree that description of all the cards is not necessary, but you're both wrong as a matter of law. The rules of a game are outside the scope of copyright (at least in the US, which is what matters for English Wikipedia). Copying from a rulebook without permission would be verboten because the rule book is an expressive work that is subject to copyright. Stating the rules of a game in your own words is permitted because rules are abstract ideas and not expressive works. Many people are confused about this issue because they fail to distinguish between copyright and patent (this due in part to the unfortunate term "intellectual property" which is often used to conflate inherently dissimilar legal domains). Deranged bulbasaur 06:38, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

text: I don't think that is needed. —ZeroOne (talk / @) 22:47, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: A stub? How much do you want?

message: An image used in this article, File:Knightmare Chess 2.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 3 December 2011 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 08:50, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Knightmare Chess 2.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Knightmare Chess. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040110034117/http://www.gamereport.com/tgr14/knightmarechess.html to http://www.gamereport.com/tgr14/knightmarechess.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:53, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified