lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Christian love

message: This page claims to be an excursus on the basic tenet of christian theology.  It is just opinion, however.  A say, once again: potential Vfd material.  →Iñgōlemo← talk 05:46, 2005 Jun 1 (UTC)
Much of the article appears to verbatim copies from the Bible. --Chiacomo 05:48, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Regarding neutrality

message: The central idea in Christian Theology is the Holiness of God.  God's love is a part of His character.  Where as Holiness is the central part of this character from which all other attributes flow.  A Christian should accept all teachings of Christ.  The reason being that Christ is God.  Therefore rejecting ANY teaching of Jesus would be rejecting a teaching of God, and therefore sin.    Mike B.
Your are right!--Melissadolbeer 04:46, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: My Ten Cents

message: The first 'summary' paragraph in the article now reads rather clumsily and doesn't make complete sense.
What about the more simple:
'Love is a central idea in Christian theology, and one of the most important themes in the Bible.'
I doubt many would disagree with the above.  (note i've said a central idea and one of the most important to try and avoid further debate! 
The article is not about God's holiness - this can better be addressed in the Christianity article.
Clare
No sooner said than done!  Melissa
:Good compromise! Question, though, why is there a "see also" to George W. Bush following the assertion that, "Most modern Christians feel such a high standard of love is not practical in the 21st century"? To me, it seems that the article asserts that GWB holds that view; if this the assertion, the statement should be properly sourced. Also, please sign your posts to discussion pages with --~~~~ as it's easier for me and others to follow. --Chiacomo  (talk) 04:49, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Compromise??

message: I have placed all of the content apart from the introduction under a heading entitled "Descriptions of Love in the New Testament". Subsequent headings on the same level (==) can describe the further development of the idea of Christian love from the early church Fathers to the present day. I think that this will do a lot toward making this a workable article. NatusRoma 06:26, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Structural changes
Talk:Chiller

message: The use of units in this article makes me cringe. What kind of unit is a ton for cooling. If we are talking about an amount of cooled water, we still don't know in what time and from what starting temperature the water is cooled.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.126.154.230 (talk) 17:51, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Units 

message: There absolutely should be a reference for the data in this table.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.68.20.187 (talk) 19:50, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Doesn't the refrigerant article have references, or is that bad policy?  LightRobb (talk) 22:11, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Refrigerants 

message: The link for MOKON is a product specific link, and it is more of an advertisement or press release than informational.  I suggest that the link should be deleted, as I have worked in HVAC for years without having heard of it before. 170.121.14.11 (talk) 16:38, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  MOKON? 
Talk:Crax

message: Crax, Crackling, and Cracklins should all be merged, don't you think? --Chiacomo 05:55, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Definitely.  If there are any subtle differences between the three they can be explained within the article. --Andy M. 07:55, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Shops

message: A newspaper essay is considered encyclopedia material? there must be something here we aren't being told. --Wetman 06:02, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I understand now. Should it be a subsection under its author, since it doesn't stand alone as an encyclopedia entry? --Wetman 17:01, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

message: Personally I don't mind if the current article is deleted - it has changed from a simple redirect to "shop" or "retailer", into an article about an essay. In my opinion, it should be either be reverted to this revision, or it should be made into a disambiguation page with a link to "shop", and a link to the current article (which in turn should be moved to "Shops (essay)"). -- All the best, Nickj (t) 00:55, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed deletion
Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/214.13.4.151

message: Wow.  The comments this IP made on the Talk:Abortion page, and here, sound a lot like 'the cabal is out to bully my NPOV (read MPOV) away!'  66.220.113.169 06:36, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Fenice, would you also leave my talk page alone, then, please, instead of harrassing me for five days solid over one edit I made, which deleted one whole spurious sentence?  And then accusing me of bullying you? Proto 09:52, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)

message: This user has been doing similar disruptive things to the Karl Rove article and it appears this person is from the U.S. Govt. or using U.S. Govt equipment. See more here Calicocat 03:22, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This user was on 24hr block for 3RR violations to Karl Rove, and has placed numerous inaccurate comments, and deleted valid fact, on numerous occasions from this article, without attempt at good faith discussions. -- RyanFreisling @ 03:32, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  214.13.4.151 = DoD
Talk:Camille (film)

message: This article has waaaay too many red links, and the general style does not conform to wikipedia standards. THE KING 07:30, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I've made this page a disambiguation, linking to each of the (mostly) new individual film articles. All but the 1921 film article are new stub articles. -Porlob 18:26, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Ecosophy

message: Social Ecology does not have a biocentrist perspective. Quite the opposite... or more balanced. Murray Bookchin, the founder of SE, is a harsh and outspoken critic of all the 'sophies' mentioned here, and especially Arne Næss' deep ecology. I have removed it from the list!
--PeterKristo 21:35, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Social Ecology

message: A google search for "quantum ecosophy" brings up nothing but this article and a myspace page of a crackpot.  Has there been anything written anywhere on quantum ecosophy?
Eok20 06:03, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: An "ecosophy formulated from quantum mechanics" is. . . how do I phrase this nicely. . . complete nonsense.  Seriously.  Note that the article "quantum ecosophy" was speedily deleted as patent nonsense last November.  Anville 13:44, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quantum Ecosophy? 

message: Seems like this article lacks inline citations.Trixie05 (talk) 14:17, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations
Talk:Piłsudski Square

message: In April of 2005 two million people mourned his death there ... - where is this number taken from ? How do you fit two million in the square ? Lysy 07:47, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Atris

message: On the picture the lightsaber is indeed blue, but if I remember correctly, when she faces the Exile her lightsaber is red. --Sikon 02:43, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: ...which only makes sense since she went Sith at that point, and Sith liked the high-powered lightsabers- which incidentally turn red in the process. --maru 16:10, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blue lightsaber? 

message: There's some evidence (in the sound files) and various threads over at Obisidian Entertainment's boards that Atris was originally meant to be Darth Traya.  Is this worth noting in the main article?
:Sure. I believe it's also documented in the strategy guide (don't have it on me right now, unfortunately). Nufy8 06:15, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sound files found in the various folders seems to indicate that Atris could end up on Malachor V and kill the Exile's companions. Atris would fall to the dark side and replace Kreia as the final boss. This could explain the cutscene in the secret tomb on Korriban, where Kreia appears as a vision to the Exile and says "am i not worthy of redemption?", where you can decide to side with her or not.  This, so this plot twist was likely scrapped during an early stage of development. Canderous Ordo 22:37, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Atris as Darth Traya
Talk:Merlin's Shop of Mystical Wonders

message: The sidebar on this page has a mistake; it links to the wrong "Pat Sansone." The Pat Sansone in the link is a male musician; the *Patricia* Sansone in the movie is a female actress. Can someone change this?   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.240.111.200 (talk) 19:09, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Someone just added a section to this article that noted the extreme similarity between the second storyline of this film and Stephen King's short story, "The Monkey", from Skeleton Crew (1985). It all but accuses the film's writers of lifting it without attribution. But the footage used in Merlin was actually from a 1984 film, The Devil's Gift , by the same writer/director, Kenneth J. Berton. Since the movie came out a year before King's book did, it raises the question of just who might have "borrowed" from whom. Does anyone have any solid information on the history of this story? — Jeff Q (talk) 08:37, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: King's story was first published in 1980, as the article notes. He would win a plagiarism suit hands-down, IMO. Daniel Case 14:35, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The Monkey

message: Someone just updated the article to state that one of the cartoons shown within the evil-monkey story was "from the Ultraman anime". I couldn't find any reference to such a thing in Ultraman, and it certainly looks nothing like the live-action character. On the other hand, it does look something like Battle of the Planets or Kagaku ninja tai Gatchaman. Does anyone have any solid information on this? ~ Jeff Q (talk) 10:18, 29 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm going to go ahead and removed the Ultraman until some kind of consensus can be reached--The_stuart 15:02, 29 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name that anime 

message: That plot description is a steaming pile written by a child. Someone who has seen this film, PLEASE, I beg of you, write a less pathetic one.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.193.92.25 (talk) 03:26, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Horrible plot description 

message: I'm skeptical that the linked Bruce Parry is the same one that played Pete in the film. They look quite different, the linked article makes no mention of The Devil's Gift's Bruce Parry's filmography. Worth removing the link.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidsjo (talk • contribs) 05:32, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong Bruce Parry
Talk:Republic of Ploiești

message: "...Iorgulescu made a phone call to Bucharest"
I suspect this is technically incorrect. I don't think there were telephones in Romania in 1870.
: You are right. It was telegraph, not telephone. Telephones were invented only in 1876... :-) bogdan ʤjuʃkə | Talk 08:47, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Action of May 1612

message: Please cite sources for this article.   —RaD Man (talk) 08:49, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: There were a bunch of articles like this that I tried to categorized (you removed... not sure why...) that seem dubious.  The editor after you put a message on the page... I am thinking of re-adding the category because the information of this article says it is a raid and therefore it should be in the raid category... If you want this deleted (and maybe that is legitimate) then do a VfD or fix it, I am not really sure... but I'm not sure removing the cat and changing the page are proper. gren 19:13, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments
Talk:Of Montreal

message: Wikipedia's Manual of Style is vast and complex (no wonder, with millions of subjects to cover), but MOS:LCITEMS suggests that of Montreal should be title-cased at the start of sentences (I have actually emailed the record label to ascertain if the band name is trademarked; I may hear back). Bearing MOS:THECAPS and MOS:THEMUSIC in mind; it is fair to assume the leading "o" should be lowercase elsewhere. Any thoughts? Fred Gandt · talk · contribs 02:19, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Manual of Style: capitalisation of the band name 

message: The referencewas triggering spam warnings and disallowed the page to be saved. I will look into it if no one else does, just not right now. Fred Gandt · talk · contribs 05:15, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kickstarter citation triggered spam blacklisting
Talk:Defaka people

message: Sorry, I just don't think there's enough here to make this a Good Article. Keep at it, though! —BorgHunter ubx (talk) 16:13, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Have to say I disagree with that and think it looks perfect for a good article.  Worldtraveller 16:33, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

text: ...so I've done what the tag said and made it a GA. Worldtraveller 16:34, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, I just started thinking that GA and these kind of articles are simply incompatible (there isn't much to expand when you've pretty much exhausted all published sources). — mark ✎ 16:46, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Failed GA
Talk:Per Martin-Löf

message: I had thought that the first usage of dependent types in a recognisable type theory was Dana Scott's usage in Constructive Validity, which was published in 1970.  Scott used a less satisfactory formulation of equality than even the extensional formulation (to my mind), but the precedence seems clear.  In any case, dependent types were not all that big a discovery, since Lawvere was using very similar ideas in topos theory.
While I'm at it, Martin-Loef randomness is a worthwhile page on its own: I encountered the idea as corresponding to one of the handful of natural intermediate degrees in talks by Stephen Simpson on Mass problems.  This would be well worth writing up: it's been on my to do list for too long for me to have any confidence that I will ever do it... --- Charles Stewart 13:43, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Origins of [[dependent type]]s

message: Martin-Löf's work provides a continuing inspiration for logic in computer science, and it seems that the potential of his ideas hasn't yet been fully realized.
Isn't this a non-verifiable fact -- it would be better to be quoting someone influential instead?
131.111.250.149 22:04, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 
Talk:National American University

message: I signed up for 2 classes online and managed to be online for about 1 hr and 43 minutes.  I was online that long because of all the trouble I was having getting logged in, trying to work around all the bad links on their site, and figuring out their archaic system.  I never got 1 minute of instruction from them.  I dropped the classes because of all the trouble I was having with their system of bad links.  Still, after paying what was told by them was a balance I owed of about $145.00 they sent me a bill of $509.00 that they said I still owed.  I must pay it even though I received not 1 minute of education.  If you're thinking of attending this "university", I would think again.  They are very expensive and are only after your money without concern about if you get an education.  BEWARE!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.73.64.163 (talk) 00:12, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Did you talk to the help desk about your various problems with the website? Did you sign a contract of some kind? ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 06:13, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  National American University ripoff
Talk:Akazukin Chacha

message: Is it spelled Akazukin Chacha, Akazukin Cha Cha, or Akazukin ChaCha? I've seen it spelled all three ways when Googling for "Akazukin". Personally I always thought it was "Cha Cha". Anyway, I made the other variations redirect to this article. TheCoffee 09:53, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Chacha is her given name isn't it? Also, I don't think this article is a stub anymore. Seems pretty in depth to me. - Squilibob 12:09, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: 1: Yes, it is. I've heard that Akazukin translates roughly to Red Riding Hood, probably having something to do with the Children's story. 2: You're right. Changed. --Lx45803 09:14, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling

message: The criticism section is unnecessary. Obviously the English dubbers decided to forego direct translations in favor of keeping with the "spirit" of the anime (eg. "Beauty Serene Arrow" makes absolutely no sense and would leave English speakers scratching their heads in confusion, hence the renaming to "Magical Selene Arrow" in English version). The use of the term "mispronunciation" also doesn't make any sense.
208.120.20.100 (talk) 06:17, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Criticism Section

message: Is that Death Note section really necessary? Wouldn't it be better to list that under DN's trivia section instead of cluttering this page? WickedKnightAlbel (talk) 06:58, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, no: it's a bit of information demonstrating the influence of this series. As such, I've edited that bit into a stub of a "Reception and influences" section. —Quasirandom (talk) 20:44, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death Note shout out 

message: Most of the sections I've marked for expansion, there's information in the ja-wiki article which could (and should) be fruitfully translated. Also, the ANN episode list checks out against the ja-wiki list and other sites in Japanese, so can be taken as a reliable source of something to be ported into the  template. Ditto ANN's OVA list. Also, it'd be good if we could find some official sites, for both manga and anime, instead of relying on fansites. —Quasirandom (talk) 16:38, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansions 

message: Also in Slayers Radio drama Extra 1, Amelia (which has the same seiyuu as Chacha) misheard the name Chacha and laughed right after, like Chacha, which confirmed it was a reference because Amelia doesn't share this trait.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.84.92.37 (talk) 05:43, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:TightVNC

message: As much as I hate to do it, I have to remove the claim of "It is one of the more widely used of VNC implementations."  I am unable to find any actual research on the matter of popularity between the two software, and my own limited research yields no means of determining actual usage data.  Performing a Google search for both "TightVNC" and "RealVNC" (in quotes) yields greater results for RealVNC with 840,000 hits while TightVNC only 527,000 hits.  Furthermore, a search for '*VNC "most popular"' and '*VNC "the most popular"' yield conflicting results but with nearly even hits for both, invalidating the usefulness of this search.
As of this writing, the only two popular VNC software are TightVNC and RealVNC, which makes the statement "one of the more" redundant as there are only two currently in any sort of demand.  I suppose if you include the countless but useless and obsolete contenders, this would be an accurate statement, but it holds no encyclopedic value.
If it were possible to obtain some sort of client-info data off some vastly popular VNC servers, popularity data may be available, but no such technology exists thus making it impossible to support a claim of popularity. ~ Agvulpine (talk) 00:27, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I only put it in because the notability tag. It is quite ludicrous that one of the top 2 or 3 VNCs should be tagged as non-notable and I wanted to make it clear that this was one of the major ones. The annoying thing is I couldn't find a reference for it. What we need is just one good reference that can kill off the notability tag. The trouble is that I can't find a really good one. TightVNC is so popular that its blog coverage makes it hard to find RS coverage. --DanielRigal (talk) 11:16, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Claim of popularity 

message: These are now on the same URL as the others.
"Viewer executable, does not require installation"  for the viewer, which is what most people think of as the "portable" part.  The server/daemon can be run manually from the "Complete set of executables, no installer" download, if someone insists.  ;)  Fixing the dead link.
50.206.59.42 (talk) 20:10, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Portable versions
Talk:Pontop Pike transmitting station

message: How heigh is the mast? It is surely not 450 metres high! The value 450 metres corresponds surely not to its height above ground level!
: I checked and the 450m refers to its height above the Ordnance Survey datum (sea level). --Tony Sidaway|Talk 11:56, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)

message: Where did the exact date info for PP's DSO come from? The Whitehaven TX has only had its switch date confirmed in the last week or so and it's first to be switched this October.  Also, the text claims PP will be last, but according to this page http://tx.mb21.co.uk/dso/index.asp Divis and Fremont Point are later. Chillysnow 00:27, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: DSO Dates
Talk:Francisco Sá Carneiro

message: After the last parlamentary commission report, shouldn't this article be updated to include the (now accepted) official explanation that it was a bomb that brought the plane down?
A link to the Irangate page seems logical considering that the most probable explanation for the bombing was to eliminate the Defense Minister (travelling on the same plane) after he just  announced he had very important revelations to make (in 1980). Will it seem too much "conspiration theory"?
: I see no problem, as long as you can link it to some fairly reputable source. David Cannon 12:09, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This is too contentious to stand without good citations. A scribd page isn't enough really. Sophie means wisdom (talk) 20:28, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uncited 
Talk:Portuguese European Constitution referendum

message: Portuguese Constitution is being revised from today. Should this article have the {current} template?
Ricardo monteiro 11:35, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure that it should. That template is really used to warn readers that the article is undergoing a period of heavy editing and may be in a mess when they look at it. Feel free to update the article with information about the change to the Portuguese Constitution. — Trilobite (Talk) 13:05, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled