Talk:Entropia Universe

message: I have some doubt, should we really mention FPC (First Planet Company) as a developer and publisher? I know that this is a group of original creators of Plant Calypso and it's universe previously called MindArk, just as rest.
Right now however they are treated in the same manner like Planet Partners - it's a department of MindArk responsible for developing Plane Calypso (but not the game itself - like engine updates, fixing bugs in engine structure etc).
In my opinion we should rather add "Planet Partners" instead "FPC" to the list, since all of the current and future planet partners are developing the game somewhat - or leave only MindArk, as the creators of the platform.
Faalagorn?/? 18:34, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  FPC - (the only) developer and publisher? 

message: The section on "Controversy" was removed as it is a work of original research (WP:OR). It is important that criticism is attributed to reliable, third-party sources (WP:V). If this can be done, fine. Otherwise I'll remove it again in accordance with Wikipedia policy. Marasmusine (talk) 16:40, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy 

message: The actual article is nothing more than free advertisement for the company.
The cost to "participate"(play) can be very high.
Of course sitting around is free,chatting, also trading is nearly free 
but the social module is not the game!
Saying it s free to participate, or the real cash economy, are white lies.
Cost to participate is probably one of the highest (if not the) in the mmorpg scene. 
The real world item value is a myth; Peds are not dollars in any way; 
and any conversion must be approved...is subject to fees, and can be eventually rejected !!
anyway it's going only one way for 90% of players.
(Players are unlikely to get anything out)
As a mmorpg (a "real cash" game) there is a lot of things to say about entropia universe.... as a social module, it s not very interesting
but anyway both are subject of controversy, and it should be expressed here.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.64.231.121 (talk) 21:46, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy is needed 

message: Remove mine at your own risk...I have proof which I am willing to share!
What I have 'no' proof of is a concerted effort of Mindark to deliberately alter the wiki (though there were numerous articles in the Entropia Forum that 'did' link to the occurances; and several in the Entropia Reality website).
Oh yeah...I played for 3 years...satisfied?
:I see. As I mentioned above, our policy is to attribute all information to reliable, third-party sources, and to avoid original research (WP:V, WP:OR). This is particularly important in any "controversy" sections. The section in this article is an opinion piece, violating both WP:Neutral point of view and verifiability policies, and therefore I'll remove it. If you want to write an objective "critical reception" section, I would advise taking a balance of negative and positive comments from published sources. Marasmusine (talk) 09:35, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Find 

message: Well, apparently, verification of facts have to be proven publicly here. As the facts relating to the matter in question require the private details of individuals to be published I shall both accept the alteration, and further commend the wiki on having such an astute and unbias representative who promotes merely factual and verifiable data be assigned to this space and is willing to devote such time to policing it on behalf of an unrelated organisation.
I hold true to my offers to provide proof under agreed anonymity for personal privacy reasons and will happily accept contact under those conditions. I stipulate this for reasons that will become clear should such contact be attempted.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Findelin (talk • contribs) 15:06, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It would be considered original research, which is not encouraged.DarkNightWolf (T|C|M) 17:02, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Find 

message: I've noticed that some fan-made websites catering for other languages have been making their way into the article. What I was wondering is if I should just delete them? because I know Wikipedia isn't a link index...
I don't want to start an edit war or something... DarkNightWolf (T|C) 02:21, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:EL is our guideline on external links. It asks us to avoid fan sites and social networking sites. In this case, I think you'd be justified in removing everything except the official link. Marasmusine (talk) 09:05, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links 

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Other speedy deletions 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 12:51, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Entropia Universe landscape.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: Just wow. Apologies to whoever's been working on this article, I mean, seriously thanks for your help and all, but the writing here falls far short of WP standards. I can't believe how much this article has gone downhill over the years. I'll fix some of it. But really, Wikipedia is not a magazine or a gaming website. This kind of informal writing is just not appropriate. Eaglizard (talk) 04:36, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Wow.

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Entropia Universe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070513060046/http://www.foxnews.com:80/wires/2007May09/0,4670,TechBitOnlinePawnshops,00.html to http://www.foxnews.com/wires/2007May09/0,4670,TechBitOnlinePawnshops,00.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:10, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Entropia Universe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110714095431/http://www.mindark.com/press/financial-reports/documents/MindArk-arsredovisning-2009.pdf to http://www.mindark.com/press/financial-reports/documents/MindArk-arsredovisning-2009.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:54, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Entropia Universe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130601125823/http://www.mpogd.com/gotm/?Date=2%2F1%2F2007 to http://www.mpogd.com/gotm/?Date=2%2F1%2F2007
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130601130311/http://www.mpogd.com/gotm/?Date=12%2F1%2F2008 to http://www.mpogd.com/gotm/?Date=12%2F1%2F2008
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:30, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: A controversy section is desperately needed in this article. Entropia Universe has ruined lives.Awoma (talk) 18:48, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy