lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Camden Station

message: I'd like to propose changing the article's title from Camden Yards station to Camden Station (with a redirect from Camden Yards station). My rationale is as follows. In the past ½ year, the article has been expanded threefold from a stub to cover the entire history of Camden Station beginning with the B&O terminal in 1856 to the current MARC operation. Throughout its 130+ year history, it was always called "Camden Station" by the B&O and in the Official Guide of the Railways. It is still called Camden Station by MARC in the MARC Camden line schedule. Only the MTA refers to the light rail stop as "Camden Yards". So, instead of using the Light Rail's term for the article title, I think we should use the MARC name for this railroad station. JGHowes talk -  15:47, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name 

message: The pic in the infobox is a really good one, but ... it's not of the station!  Yes, I know that the building was the station for most of its existence, but Camden Station is still in operation, so shouldn't the topmost photo on the page be of the actual current station as it exists today?  We don't have any great pics, but I'd suggest this one...--Jfruh (talk) 14:51, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added a caption to make it clear that the structure pictured was the station for most of its existence — 1856 to the 1980s. This article is about the entire 150+ years of Camden Station. As to the present, there is no "Camden Station" building, per se: just tracks. The picture of a MARC train is already on the page in the gallery and is not really the "station", either. Technically, I suppose it would be the old B&O coach parked on a siding (not pictured) which constitutes the only identifiable "station" facility where tickets are sold. JGHowes talk -  23:07, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I would have to disagree with you there. The platform is at least part of the station and therefore a more appropriate picture for the infobox and the old station building. I swapped the pictures (yes, I made the edit. For some reason it logged me out). Murjax (talk) 18:35, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Top photo isn't of the station
Talk:KVAN (AM)

message: As I understand it, the agreement of the radio project group is that station articles track stations, not stations that used to have the same call sign.   Almost the entire article is discussing a defunct radio station from the 1970s, which should be its own article KVAN (Defunct) - assuming that station even qualifies as notable.69.37.68.72 (talk) 20:12, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs to be split
Talk:Bennett BTC-1

message: I am proposing that this article be renamed "Bennett BTC-1", as the aircraft was built under this name by the Bennett Aircraft Company in 1937.  The "Globe" name was not given to this aircraft until 1941 when Bennett became bankrupt.
Your comments and thoughts are welcome.
Regards, Buster40004 Talk 01:58, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening heading
Talk:Lucero (entertainer)

message: According to the news release the couple issued, the word "divorce" was not mentioned -- only that the two are separated. It is inaccurate to say (at this point, anyway) that they are getting divorced. --Tclpups (talk) 01:06, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marital status 
Talk:Ellery Huntington Jr.

message: I am researching World War II espionage and discovered Huntington had a notable role, so I added a brief note about it to this Wikipedia article.   The specific reference I used is available in full online at
http://books.google.com/books?id=7wHWT3WT_rYC&printsec=frontcover&dq=mcintosh+sisterhood+of+spies&hl=en&ei=5w6QTKnvHoHG8wTLnZTGDg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCgQ6AEwAA#v=snippet&q=code-room%20mata%20hari&f=false
==Assessment comment==
Substituted at 18:15, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: World War II
Talk:Tad Wieman

message: I saw your reverts at the two Princeton season articles. Wieman was commonly known as "Tad" while head coach at Princeton, but "Elton" at other times? I see lots of reference to "Tad" in the sources at other points his life, from 1915 to his death in 1971. Perhaps the article should be renamed to Tad Wieman? Jweiss11 (talk) 00:45, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: During his Princeton years, newspaper usage of "Tad Wieman" exceeded "Elton Wieman" by a factor of more than 10 to 1. When the article was created back in 2007, the "Elton" naming was presumably applied because official Michigan sources such as the Bentley refer to him as "Elton" during his years as a player (e.g., this, this). If you wish to pursue a move, I have no objection that. In the meantime, the overwhelming ratio in favor of "Tad" during the Princeton years dictates per WP:COMMONNAME that he should be referred to as "Tad" in Princeton team articles. Cbl62 (talk) 01:34, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I moved the article. The sources cited here overwhelmingly used Tad in their titles. Jweiss11 (talk) 01:54, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Common name: Tad or Elton
Talk:MI-5 Persecution

message: Happy New Year! Although he's been around, more people are just starting to notice him. Therefore, I have created a page named for the commonality in his subject line, which is now slightly changing to avoid spam filters. I fully expect vandalism here, since people hate him, so please help me take care of this page. MMetro (talk) 20:27, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There are other articles on controversial Internet figures, he is listed as a notable Usenet personality, he has recently changed his tactics, and people trying to find out why he is posting need somewhere to look. They will not think of searching Notable Usenet Personalities. Therefore, at the very least, there should be a REDIRECT. I have spent the last hour cleaning up this article, it started as copied from NUP, but it is referenced. What more does Wikipedia want? MMetro (talk) 22:11, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reason against Speedy Deletion

message: Hello, and thanks for making this better than it was. It's still borderline, but not as egregious as an attack page. Please read WP:BLP for information about what to include and what to avoid in articles about living people. We will need verifiable sources not connected with the source. (See WP:RS and WP:V) Examples of his posts don't count. As an encyclopedia, Wikipedia needs Secondary sources. Things written by the author are primary sources. The synthesis of primary sources may be unacceptable as original research. Third party reporting-- books and reputable news articles-- are usually the best. Hope this helps. Cheers,    Dlohcierekim  22:43, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What more  does wikipedi a want.?
Talk:Taiwan–Venezuela relations

message: Suggest this article's name changed to Republic of China-Venezuela relations as my understanding is that "Taiwan" is an informal name for the Republic of China. Sardanaphalus (talk) 04:04, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia:WikiProject_International_relations#Guidelines says that the adjective forms of the countries are to be used. And Taiwanese is the demonym for the ROC.--Jerrch 22:16, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 
Talk:River Conwy

message: Afon Ddu is listed twice in the list of tributaries. Is this correct? Tim P (talk) 20:28, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it is correct - I have now dismbiguated them. Hogyn Lleol (talk) 20:39, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Excellent Tim P (talk) 20:55, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: It was not clear that the previous stated length was referenced. The new one is referenced back to the UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology. As with so many quoted river lengths, it is not stated where the length is measured to downstream. Geopersona (talk) 14:44, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  River length
Talk:Johnny Jupiter

message: Removed Wiki-Link syntax for Cliff Hall because that link re-directs to a Wikipedia bio for a U.K. folk group named The Spinners (not to be confused with the American R & B group of the same name). The U.K. Spinners group did include a musician named Cliff Hall.
The Cliff Hall who was an actor and appeared in the Johnny Jupiter series has no wikipedia bio page. Indeed, there are no Wikipedia Bio Pages profiling any person real or fictional named Cliff Hall.
Fgf2007 (talk) 12:48, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  January 7 2020: Cliff Hall in the INFOBOX
Talk:Communications and media in Sarajevo

message: The file :File:Sarajevo Twist Tower.jpg, used on this page, has been deleted from Wikimedia Commons and re-uploaded at :File:Sarajevo Twist Tower.jpg. It should be reviewed to determine if it is compliant with this project's non-free content policy, or else should be deleted and removed from this page. Commons fair use upload bot (talk) 12:46, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use candidate from Commons: [[:File:Sarajevo Twist Tower.jpg]]
Talk:Nusretiye Mosque

message: Istanbul is not a middle eastern city therefore I deleted that information. Main part of the city is located on the European continent, together with this particular mosque. Filanca (talk) 08:46, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
File talk:Suite No2 for Cello All By Its Lonesome.jpg

message: Is this really GFDL?  It looks like a scan of a music-book cover, with no visible copyright notice on the cover itself as shown, so the uploader is presumably claiming that he is either the copyright holder, or has their permission to distribute their property under the terms of the GFDL.  Surely we need at least for him to specify which he's claiming is the case... 81.86.133.45 (talk) 20:34, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:The Gatekeepers (book)

message: I've nominated this article for deletion because it reads like publicity for the book. I was going to trim it down and went looking on Google for notability but found nothing other than confirmation that it is a non-bestselling title that is not notable. Seems like a simple addition to the 'how to get into college' market.Malke 2010 (talk) 17:45, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  AfD
Talk:KL.FM 96.7

message: Request to change name of article to Greatest Hits Radio West Norfolk. Socialist Distancing (talk) 14:30, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Name Change
Talk:1963 Edmonton municipal election

message: The following text appeared at Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style#Unflagged_quotes:
*I have been informed that the article Edmonton municipal election, 1963 contains a quote. Now that I know it is a quote, I can see it. However, I have mistaken it more than once for ordinary text and converted a unit in the text. This has unintentionally annoyed the most frequent editor (User:Sarcasticidealist). I think that there is something unusual about unflagged quotes. There must be some way in which that article can flag quote text to the uninitiated user. Can anyone suggest what needs to be done?  Lightmouse (talk) 11:05, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added block quotes. JIMp talk·cont 07:28, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unflagged quotes
Talk:1971 Edmonton municipal election

message: The 1971 city election also saw a plebiscite on whether to build a convention centre. It was approved in the plebiscite, then approved again in a 1979 referendum (on its own page in the Edmonton election sequence), built and now named the Shaw Convention Centre. The 1979 vote was held on Nov. 28, and newspaper coverage will support this historical fact. August 9, 2007 Edmonton Real Estate Weekly, "It's our Heritage," has a good write-up on the decade-long debate with four or so ballot questions on the issue.  Tom Monto, Edmonton 96.52.225.148 (talk) 23:47, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of Dave the Barbarian characters

message: I removed all of the links to "Main articles" about the characters because they all linked back to the main page.Saxophobia (talk) 14:44, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits
Talk:The Invisibles (The Outer Limits)

message: "The "governor" refutes him, saying that his only role is as that of an Invisible. Their purpose is to infect key government and business figures with crab-like creatures who attach themselves to people's backs and take over their minds. In so doing, the Invisibles plan to conquer the world. Each of the new recruits will be given a target to infect following their innoculation."
This sounds very much like the basic plot of the first season TNG episode Conspiracy.--FeanorStar7 (talk) 07:17, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible template for a Star Trek:TNG episode?

message: The Plot section currently says: "It turns out that Spain is actually an agent for the GIA, sent to infiltrate the Invisibles. He sneaks out to meet his contact in the woods and states his plan to try to establish a friendship with the desperately lonely Plannetta so he can get Plannetta to call his "kid brother" so that they can meet up later. In reality, the number is that of GIA headquarters."
First of all, it's ambiguous: Planetta is supposed to make a phone call to his own kid brother or Spain's kid brother?  Who are "they" to meet up later?  Spain and Planetta?  Planetta and his kid brother?  Etc.?
I saw this episode recently and I thought that Spain gives Planetta the phone number and tells Planetta to call GIA and identify himself as Spain's kid brother.  As written (above), Planetta is calling to ask FOR Spain's kid brother; as I remember it, Planetta is calling and IDing himself as Spain's kid brother.  
I hope someone can watch it again and take some notes! AdderUser (talk) 06:23, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot correction?  Whose kid brother or who is the kid brother?
Talk:Where'd You Go? (The Mighty Mighty Bosstones song)

message: I noticed there's a "track listing," even though this is just a song, which includes songs that aren't even by The Mighty Mighty Bosstones. What is this...?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.145.175.246 (talk) 00:22, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Track listing?
Talk:Johnny Woodly

message: This translated wiki article has a source that is not english. this should be considered invalid. I manage some spanish and german, but no chinese.  --ProfPolySci45 (talk) 07:15, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  really? 
Talk:Never Again (The X-Files)

message: Both the article and the internet at large seem to have an even split.  Giving up. - Immigrant laborer (talk) 18:18, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The Meisler book spells it "Betty", so I'd defer to that. That's just my thought, tho.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 05:07, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Betty?  or Bettie?
Talk:Montecristo No. 4

message: I've deprodded this.  There are a multitude of published books on Cuban cigars, but unfortunately not much with a preview.  For instance The Cuban Cigar Handbook, published by Simon and Schuster, definitely has a significant amount to say on the Montecristo range as a whole, which is certainly notable.  I couldn't tell from the limited preview how much it has on the no. 4 in particular, but there is definitely some information.  This needs visits to libraries and/or interlibrary loans to truly establish notability, but it is highly likely that a decent amount of sourced information can be found. Because of that, I don't think that arbitrary deletion by prod is suitable. SpinningSpark 21:12, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed deletion
Talk:Mystery Case Files: Huntsville

message: "MCF: Huntsville features over 15 puzzling crimes in over 20 unique locations. Moreover, each time you solve the crime, you can restart and play an entirely new scenario with new clues and a new thief!"
"MCF: Huntsville features pre-rendered puzzles with many moving parts, as well as high quality orchestral audio, elegant graphics, and outstanding character voicing."
Someone more dedicated than I should edit this. The POV guideline has been smashed to bits, not to mention that this is probably copied directly from an advertisement. 209.98.250.190 (talk) 21:06, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Never End

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement.  Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. 💵Money💵emoji💵Talk💸Help out at CCI!  03:08, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:Mitchell Library

message: Removed the claim that it is the largest public reference library in Europe, it was with out citation and more to the point isn't true. (passer by)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.97.133.254 (talk) 00:15, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

message: As a Glasgow local I've heard this said a lot, but as has been said earlier on this page, I'm not sure that it's true. (Define "largest", for a start.) Glasgow Life's history of the library says that at the time of the opening of the extension in 1981, it was "in terms of area, the largest public reference library in Europe." [source here https://www.glasgowlife.org.uk/libraries/Documents/history_mitchell.pdf] Any advances / other sources?  Lirazelf (talk) 11:29, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Largest reference library in Europe? 

message: Hi! There is info missing about the Aldred collection on this page. I can't edit it, so could someone help? Delphine Dallison (talk) 13:37, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Aldred Collection 

message: Noting that there was another Mitchell Library in Ontario, Canada. It was a Carnegie library. See List of Carnegie libraries in Canada. I figured it'd be a good idea to note this here in case anyone else was interested in digging further. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 20:10, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  A library by the same name in Canada
Talk:The Adventures of Robinson Crusoe (TV series)

message: Well, obviously that's not correct, is it?
The author needs to check his maths.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.150.105.139 (talk) 12:54, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  For at least three generations of UK children this was the definitive TV version of Daniel Defoe's classic novel.
Talk:Product Development and Management Association

message: Here is my review of the first 13 items from the reference list. I was searching for reliable sources. It is my hope that the article can be rewritten so it has much less reliance on PDMA's website and publications, and uses evaluations from outsiders. EdJohnston (talk) 21:18, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Great find.  That reference (here) shows PDMA's JPIM academic journal to be #19 worldwide, just immediately below MIT's highly prestigious Sloan Management Review.  Then consider the fact that JPIM is devoted JUST to the topic of new product development, whereas all the others are much broader in their scope.  PDMA / JPIM has a specific focus on innovation which the others do not and are not restricted by.  It's remarkable that this journal is ranked as high as it is.  Great find, Ed, thanks.  --Davolson (talk) 02:43, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

text: Ridiculing other WP articles is not helpful; the task is to make this one reach the proper standard. Your finding of the Intel remark about the OCI award is good. It would be even better if we saw the award to Intel being mentioned in the trade press, because they are a reliable source. The Economist mention could be usable, but it only adds to the notability of the OCI award, and there is no factual information in there that we can add to the PDMA article (except that the specific award took place). I sense that we will have to make the PDMA article smaller, since we don't find outsiders commenting on the organization's history or significance.  The remark 'If you don't know the PDMA, you should check it out' (Business Week) is good, but it's a bit fragmentary. A longer writeup on PDMA in Business Week (if there had ever been one) would be quite credible. The Kumar book that you found mentioning the BMW award is good.  EdJohnston (talk) 13:21, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: My standard of comparison for this, from the very start of this, is the Wikipedia article on the American Marketing Association.  It's just a stub.  All I really want for PDMA is a stub.  Instead, JzG deleted the whole page, making it impossible for anyone to ever add information to the page.  Either put PDMA's page up as a stub, or eliminate the page for the American Marketing Association.  Except for our size, the organizations are highly comparable.  Why are they OK, and we are not?  Where are their "external" and independent sources?  I don't see them in their article.  I'm asking for fairness and equanimity, that's all.    --Davolson (talk) 19:09, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes on the references
Talk:Communist Party of Germany (Opposition)

message: Brandler didn't manage to return to Germany until 1949 as the Allied authorities refused him permission to enter Germany in the immediate post-war period. When he did return, he returned to West Germany, not East Germany. On his return he linked with a number of former members of the KPO to found the Gruppe Arbeiterpolitik. This can be confirmed by checking the article on Heinrich Brandler in the German Wikipedia
I think the original writer may have mixed up Brandler and Jacob Walcher, the former leader of both the KPO and the SAP, who did return to East Germany in 1946, joined the Socialist Unity Party, from which he was later expelled and then readmitted. This can be confirmed by checking the article in the German Wikipedia on Jacob Walcher. - Mia-etol (talk) 14:46, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brandler and the Socialist Unity Party
Talk:Boekelo

message: Anyone knows population of Boekelo?
----
I'm a resident of Boekelo, but currently it makes no sense to put up a population number, a new quarter has been build, a lot of people are moving to Boekelo at the moment, and the population will (my rough estimate) increase by about 25%. NOTE: I do not know the population of Boekelo, this estimate is based on the current housing area on the map, and the new housing area.
EDIT: I looked it up, current population of around 1915, population with the new quarter inhabited estimated at 2700. (According to nl.wikipedia.org)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Blodskaal (talk • contribs) 07:49, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Sony Ericsson W890i

message: Why do you consider this to be advertising? It just lists the features of the phone; it doesn't say whether those features are good or otherwise. The fact that you initially consider it to have met the speedy deletion criteria are frankly baffling. Read it again. Add constructive things if you like, but please don't mark a perfectly good article for deletion! Thanks.
 86.128.207.94 (talk) 21:22, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:List of disproved mathematical ideas

message: * They used to believe that a complete consistent formalisation of Mathematics existed before Gödel's incompleteness theorem
* They used to believe that functions were all "nicely behaved", as in only had countably many points where the function wasn't smooth. 
--121.221.164.44 (talk) 05:10, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  More ideas 

message: I removed the 4 color theorem from the list of disproved mathematical ideas. It was finally completely proven by Georges Gonthier in 2005, even fully formally verified.Andreasabel (talk) 21:47, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  4 color theorem was proven by Gonthier (2005)