lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Tidal tensor

message: I created the original version of this article and had been monitoring it, but I am leaving the WP and am now abandoning this article to its fate.
Just wanted to provide notice that I am only responsible (in part) for the last version I edited; see User:Hillman/Archive.  I emphatically do not vouch for anything you might see in more recent versions, although I hope for the best.
Good luck in your search for information, regardless!---CH 18:09, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Students beware
Talk:Timelike congruence

message: I created the original version of this article, which concerns a topic dear to my heart, and I had been monitoring it for bad edits, but I am leaving the WP and am now abandoning this article to its fate.
Just wanted to provide notice that I am only responsible (in part) for the last version I edited; see User:Hillman/Archive.  I emphatically do not vouch for anything you might see in more recent versions, although I hope for the best.
Good luck to  and to all students in your search for information, regardless!---CH 18:10, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Students beware
Talk:ATS-6

message: I changed the name of ATS-6 from the incorrect Advanced Test Satellite to the correct Applications Technology Satellite. See: http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/database/MasterCatalog?sc=1974-039A — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimj wpg (talk • contribs) 01 July 2006 13:11:16 (UTC) 
:Yep Sea diver 09:43, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Applications Technology Satellite

message: I believe that the Customer (NASA) knows better which company has built the spacecraft : Fairchild. No mention of Ford Aerospace anywhere.The previously quoted source citing Ford is not confirmed anywhere else, to my knowledge. By the way, when ATS-6 was built and launched, Ford Aerospace did not exist (yet), it was Philco-Ford and later on Ford Aeronutronics. Smteacsm1 (talk) 22:41, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Manufacturer of ATS-6 

message: I've located some documentation on the NTRS which relates to the early planning for this mission which reveals that two identical spacecraft were going to be built then launched. I've not yet found anything confirming that they were both supposed to be in orbit at the same time.Graham1973 (talk) 15:50, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, during the early stages of the project, two spacecraft were planned, but the second one was dropped due to budget constraints in 1973 (and the whole program was nearly scraped, being placed on hold at several instances) Smteacsm1 (talk) 20:01, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: ATS-F & ATS-G
Talk:Leandro Cufré

message: Cufré first kicked Mertesacker in the left thigh, then in the groin.  This picture of Mertesacker after the fight shows the welts he received on his thigh.
Reportedly the Argentian team shouted insults at the Germans selected for the penalty shootout.  Tim Borowski, one of the German shooters, then motioned them to shut up after he had scored the fourth and last German penalty goal.  Some suspect that Cufré sought revenge for this gesture but mistook Mertesacker for Borowski.  Not that this would make his actions any more defensible, of course.
As an interesting side note, both Cufré and Mertesacker bore/bear the number 17 in their respective teams.  Aragorn2 18:12, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've cleaned up the paragraph a bit and added a  tag to the last sentence - is he really the fist player to be sent off after the whistle/without playing in the World Cup? I haven't seen any mention of it. Also, please don't change "violent conduct" to "kicking Per Mertesacker in the genitals" - it's redundant is not an official reason given for the red card. Ytny 04:41, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kicking Per Mertesacker 
Talk:Marcelo Balboa

message: Looking through the history, it seems like those who like balboa and keep reverting a page without any negatives and those who dislike him and write negative (sometimes wildly speculative and inappropriate) information. Perhaps we can find a middle ground? I think a controversy section is apropos. I feel like as long as the information in the section is supported by outside sources and presented making minimal judgements, it should be there. Sweeping controversy under the rug is never a good idea. Thoughts?--17.201.42.190 19:55, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that as long as there are good outside sources provided, the controversy should be included.  This isn't just a few people on the web whining -- this actually being reported on.  I added one source earlier.  Any more that people can find is definately appreciated. --Loudsox 01:07, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversy
Talk:Bamana tribe

message: This article reads like it was copied from somewhere. No sources are provided.  KarenAnn 18:17, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree; also, it seems like it could be from someone's own research. Either way, something needs to be done. I think the current tags are sufficient for now; I'm reluctant to put prod on this article because of a lack of evidence. --Douglas Whitaker 21:07, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

text: As no one has found a source I'll start wikifying it.  --JeffW 03:25, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

message: content merged to Bambara, per merge tag. Content needs to be checked & cleaned up, and references added. phoebe 05:19, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge
Talk:Stanford Stadium

message: The Farm is not the nickname of the stadium, but rather a nickname for Stanford University in general. Also, Stanford Stadium DID host a 1999 Women's world cup match, a semifinal game between won by the United States against Brazil. --Bfraga 18:19, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: With the stadium being completely redone, should there be a new, seperate article for the new stadium?  Wondering about everyone else's thoughts on the matter.... ToddC4176 21:29, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see why that would be necessary. When the stadium is completed, a section should be devoted to the "old" stadium, but since Stanford is officially calling it a "renovation", all records and history of events hosted will pass to the new stadium. --Bfraga 17:46, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Stadium, New Page?
Talk:Portage River (Kalamazoo–St. Joseph counties)

message: Is there a verifiable source that indicates Portage Creek is a tributary of Portage River? By my reckoning of Topozone maps , the Portage Creek flows rises in the Gourdneck State Game area and flows northward into the Kalamazoo. OK, I see here  that there is another Portage Creek
that flows mostly south through Vicksburg to the Portage River. Interesting. I also came across this report from the DNR. My printed county atlas is more ambiguous. It shows a Portage Creek coming out of the north and the south ends of Austin Lake, with one flowing north and the other flowing south. Somehow, I doubt that is accurate. older ≠ wiser 21:24, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Portage Creek tributary
Talk:Gary Chapman (musician)

message: Did I just miss it or is it not mentioned anywhere in this article?--Krystaleen 07:00, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Find a reference and add it. You might also want to listen to the most recent Full Circle Jesus Music podcast where he is featured. Walter Görlitz (talk) 07:47, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

text: No. It does not have an author. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:16, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

text: I will look for an authored source. Hmmreally 17:40, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

text: Would this be considered a reliable source?  Hmmreally 17:47, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

text: That source would be sufficient for his involvement with CCM Countdown, but not for his drug problems. The Encyclopedia of Contemporary Christian Music talks about that on page 156. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:29, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  No mention of his drugs problem? 
Talk:List of England players with only one cap

message: # There is no soruce. How do we know these are not made up?
# It's at a poor title. If it were to be sourced, it should be merged with List of England international footballers, as has been proposed
Solutions are either to move and keep the clean up/unsourced tag, or delete. Unfortunately, due to the presence of 'List of England international footballers', then I think deletion is the only option unless the improvements occur. --Robdurbar 18:35, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Shouldn't it be at *deep breath* List of England international footballers who only won one cap.....? ChrisTheDude 10:07, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Problems with this page
Talk:Chimaji Appa

message: This should have been named "Chimaji Appa" and not "Chimnaji appa". Is there any way to edit the title of this page?
This article appears too well-written to have been written from scratch. No reference soruces or citations are given.    KarenAnn 18:39, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:Future interest

message: It doesn't fit in my screen/browser...
I don;t know ewhat happened. 13:32, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Help, Article too wide

message: I note the reference to a need for review.  I do not see much wrong with it as it is.  My only comment is that I think that the owner of an absolute interest (fee simple) subject to a condition subsequent (even if subject to a gift over) can disentail and thereby bar the condition.  This does not apply to a life interest, for example protective trusts where the life tenant has an interest until he alienates it (or purports to), upon which a discretionary trust arises.  This is a matter of English law and perhaps does not apply in other jurisdictions.  Peterkingiron 18:49, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Intr0

message: The article lists five types of future interests: Reversion, Possibility of Reverter, Right of Entry, Remainder, and Executory Interest. However, the article claims there are six (see just above contents box). I assume it's an oversight, but please change it back if I'm wrong.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.74.165.20 (talk) 07:54, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Five types? 

message: Executory interest is presently a very short article with information almost completely overlapping what is already here. Granted, more could be said about it, but if it gets to the point of making this article too large, we can move it back out. bd2412 T 03:47, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Logos of the Walt Disney Company

message: I am concerned that the creators of this article might be sockpuppets of User:Logoboy95. — Jul. 1, '06 [18:53] <[ freak]|[ talk]>
* It might be unrelated logo fans; there are at least a couple around. See Talk:Walt Disney Home Entertainment for one group. —tregoweth (talk) 21:03, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Sonic the Hedgehog: Triple Trouble

message: Should it be noted that Sonic got shot?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.71.62.59 (talk) 01:22, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Not really, no. Sergecross73 msg me  03:44, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Well he did get shot.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.163.17.131 (talk) 14:45, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay. Sergecross73 msg me  14:53, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

text: But he is the main character with plot armour right? Nakamura-the Sonic topic (talk) 06:48, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sonic alive 

message: * https://kotaku.com/game-gear-micro-is-missing-the-best-portable-sonic-game-1843909729 Sergecross73 msg me 21:03, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  New sources
Talk:Sonic Blast

message: * http://www.usgamer.net/articles/forgotten-entries-in-famous-video-game-franchises Sergecross73 msg me 00:14, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source 
Talk:Luther Sloan

message: Hello. I just added :Category:Fictional secret agents and spies to this redirect. It seems appropriate that Luther Sloan should appear in the category, and it appears from Wikipedia talk:Redirect/Archive 1#Categorization of redirects that this is ok to do. If for some reason, categorizing a redirect isn't a good idea, then please feel free to revert. Cheers, Lbbzman 19:02, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Categorization
Talk:Nerdcore Rising

message: Just a note to Quoth:  I don't know if you got a defective copy or a "second printing" or something like that, but the copy I ordered direct from the Front himself did have "NERDC0R3 R1S1N6" on the spine.  Whether or not it's worth noting in the article is a matter of opinion, but I just thought you should know that your copy obviously doesn't represent every copy available (since it was someone other than me who added that to the article in the first place). - Ugliness Man 10:38, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm aware that my copy may not represent every copy available, which is why I specified the time at which I ordered mine (in the same manner as yours). I was simply alerting whoever was concerned that there may be different variants of the album packaging in circulation, but it is not the reason why I removed it a second time. I fail to see how "(spine title: NERDC0R3 R1S1N6)" adds anything useful to the article, at least in that form. If you believe it does, please re-add it to the article, perhaps elaborating. I apologise for sounding blunt earlier, but I frequently find articles laden with pieces of uninteresting trivia. – Quoth 04:05, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NERDC0R3 R1S1N6
Talk:Sonic Advance 2

message: Isn't it something of a spoiler to show that image of Super Sonic in the character section? Paul Haymon 04:02, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spoiler? 

message: Isn't it just a myth that Amy is unlockable? Untii next edit, SonicBoom95 22:16, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amy as a myth? 

message: should the flash version that's prominent in many free flash game sites be mentioned?
:It should be mentioned.  I have writen about it but I need more information. So can anyone play the Flash game to complete this section I wrote. 200.55.113.109 14:57, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: FORGET IT. WIKIPEDIA CLEANED MY SECTION. 200.55.113.109 03:59, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flash version 

message: the first appearence of cream was in sonic adventure (sonicthehedgehog9000).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sonicthehedgehog9000 (talk • contribs) 19:42, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  first appearence of cream was in sonic adventure
Talk:Jaroso, Colorado

message: Added stub in the process of expanding the Southern San Luis Valley Railroad Co. page. -- Charlie (Colorado) 19:10, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Sonic Labyrinth

message: The game has no jumping involved!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sega31098 (talk • contribs) 19:46, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is NOT a platform game! 

message: Do people think this is GA ready? I can't find any development info. Maybe this is the best we can get from what's out there. TarkusABtalk 14:35, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Came here from GAN but I don't think it can be a GA without development information. Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Video games#Essential content,  is considered essential for any VG article. I don't feel experienced enough a GA reviewer to fail this nom for that but I suggest you consider withdrawing the nom and focusing on other articles or at least starting a discussion at WT:VG whether articles without development information can be GAs in general. Regards SoWhy 12:45, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: OK I guess I agree. I think that when no development info available, some background information should cover it, but I didn't bother to do that here. Maybe like "Sonic is a series developed by Sega. This is one of his first isometric games, previous games were 2D etc. etc." I will renominate if I can find a couple sentences to add. TarkusABtalk 14:16, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA ready 

message: You know what's funny , you're right.
Your continuous silly edit warring prompted me to look into it, and they did not develop as many games as I thought. I believed they were more influential because by chance I had researched a couple of the games they developed, and concluded there must have been many others out there. I did a quick search and their list of works is surprisingly short. Oh! Silly me! I removed the red link unless someone can find an appropriate redirect.
Instead of warring with empty summaries, claiming its not notable without any evidence, or claiming its ugly, you could have brought this information to me on the talk page months ago, and I would have agreed with you. Jesus H. Christ. TarkusABtalk 14:23, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: there's no need to be so uptight about it, you could've rather looked into the matter yourself instead of just adding a red link and allowing it to stay there for months on end. Seems like I upset you though, sorry about that. EthanRossie2000 discuss 14:32, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  I apologize, all I ask is that when you have conflicts in the future, take the discussion to the talk page instead of edit warring which wastes everyone's time. The burden to start the discussion and share proof was on you, not me, as you were the one that wanted change. TarkusABtalk 14:48, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minato Giken red link
Talk:Tails Adventure

message: I decided to be bold and translate the Spanish Wiki's intro to English. It's a little rough, but with a little help it can be fine. --SonicChao talk 16:15, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Translate from Español

message: Does anybody know about this game's reception? I feel that the article is incomplete without it. - Up and over for a six! (talk) 23:06, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Reception about this game is absent from the internet. Formerly Codename Colorado | The Earwig (User | Talk | Contributions) 03:11, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception
Talk:Jean-Luc Grand-Pierre

message: had a hard time finding a cite for this so I am leaving it here for now "He is also currently an associate head coach for the New Albany High School hockey team in New Albany, Ohio." Jessamyn (talk) 00:42, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  high school coach
Talk:Sonic's Schoolhouse

message: Is it worth noting that on the game disc, alternate video and sound files of a clock-like character were found? It suggests that Sonic wasn't always intended to be part of this game, but since speculation doesn't belong on Wikipedia, mentioning it could still work, if it's worth noting. - Snip3rNife (talk) 16:36, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last-minute addition of Sonic? 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://info.sonicretro.org/index.php?title=Sonic%27s_Schoolhouse&diff=next&oldid=58431. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  – Frood (talk) 00:11, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi ,  originally wrote this content in 2004, and a user named Scarred Sun copied this content to Sonic Retro in 2006. In this case, it looks like Sonic Retro is the site that has the copyright violation, since there's no attribution of Wikipedia. — Newslinger talk 05:33, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, thank you for letting me know. My mistake! – Frood (talk) 21:03, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Peter Coates

message: I think that chunks of this article simply need to be deleted, unless citations can be found to support it. Beest 19:16, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The early life section is word for word this book description: https://www.bookdepository.com/Peter-Coates-Jerold-Angelus/9786200641670, so I added that as a source as well as the plagiarized tag. Greente28 (talk) 17:17, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagiarized tag
Talk:Harry A. Ironside

message: It seems to me that one reason this article was placed on the deletion list was because the biography on the main page is still so short. It is a stub, after all.  Adding some more facts to Ironside's biography would provide better evidence for others to weigh his notability.  DFH 19:20, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed...I found a lot of appropriate material, but didn't want to invest the time in writing a good article if it would just then get deleted. I figured that one of the criteria of WP:BIO is multiple publications, so I thought by at least documenting these for the moment it might get the article saved.  Akradecki 20:09, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: For similar reasons, I justed added the sentence about his influence. DFH 17:45, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

text: There are still 3 red links in the expanded biography. DFH 19:21, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Any harm in leaving them, to prompt future articles? There used to be one on Moody Church, but it was deleted for copyright violations, as it was a direct cut-and-paste from the Church's website. Akradecki 19:26, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expand the biography 

message: Changed quality rating from B to C.  The article needs more inline citations and references to qualify as B class.  PKT(alk) 19:46, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment