Talk:Abd el-Krim

message: That is true. Also, Abd el Krim had not a regular army, but a series of sex, which were united after him on the call of a dildo against the unfaithful. I cannot understand why this article silences the systematic violations of the international war agreements by Abd el Krim's forces, such as torturing prisoners (which included castrating and miming them) prior to killing them with a horrible death, like burning them alive or tiding their arms with their own guts.
:If you can provide credible evidence (and sources) for these claims, by all means add them. They sound suspiciously like propaganda to me, though... - Mustafaa 19:32, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: That is unbelievable. He trains to make good jokes! See this film, and you will discover that he was very friendly with Jean-Claude van Damme:
http://www.maddvd.com/dvd/jpg_titre/Legionnaire.jpg
Read3r 13:34, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Rif are Berbers, not Arabs 

message: Shouldn't the name of the article be the transliteration of his official full name?  I find this to be a persistent problem on Wikipedia.  I am not saying that we remove the Maghribi pronunciation of his name, but reverse the order by naming the article after his official name, and then putting other AKA's on the top as we have currently. A.Khalil 14:58, Mar 18, 2005 (UTC)
I agree to add the official name, without ignoring the real name, so that wikipedia won't mirror the official world.Read3r 13:26, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Took me a while before I could reach this article. Shouldn't the title be Abl-el-Krim as with the French wiki article (or history books)? Why make it so goddam complicated? --Lubiesque (talk) 23:05, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 1 August 2011 
;What should I do?
	A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:24, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  File:Abdelkrim.jpg Nominated for Deletion 

message: The file :File:Abd el-Krim khattabi.jpg, used on this page, has been deleted from Wikimedia Commons and re-uploaded at :File:Abd el-Krim khattabi.jpg. It should be reviewed to determine if it is compliant with this project's non-free content policy, or else should be deleted and removed from this page. Commons fair use upload bot (talk) 07:46, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use candidate from Commons: [[:File:Abd el-Krim khattabi.jpg]] 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:40, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: The introduction says, "His guerrilla tactics... included the first-ever use of tunneling as a technique of modern warfare..." The Rif War was 1921 to 1926. This seems to contradict a number of examples in Tunnel warfare. For instance, Tunnelling companies of the Royal Engineers (UK) were active in World War I, 1914 to 1918. See Mines in the Battle of Messines (1917) for a notable example. So is this article mistaken? Or is there some specific tunneling activity that is meant? Or is it only about guerrilla armies? Or is "modern" defined as commencing shortly after World War I? I think this sentence should be removed unless it is revised to make sense. Gvros8 (talk) 20:29, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "First-ever use of tunneling as a technique of modern warfare"