Talk:Brent Cross

message: ===Stadium Road===
Anyone got any idea why one of the roads on the site is called Stadium Road?  Was there a Stadium of some sort on the site beforehand?
87.81.116.105
Yes. There was a Greyhound stadium on the site until the 1950s.
--Scotthatton (talk) 12:29, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: History

message: Anyone got any idea why one of the roads on the site is called Stadium Road?  Was there a Stadium of some sort on the site beforehand?
87.81.116.105
Yes. There was a Greyhound stadium on the site until the 1950s.
--Scotthatton (talk) 12:29, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Stadium Road

message: This page should be entitled Brent Cross Shopping Centre as Brent Cross is the name of the whole area - this needs its own article.
--Scotthatton (talk) 12:29, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article move

message: In my view the two images promoting pressure group campaigns should be removed. Grim23★ 01:14, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The first would sit better in a separate article on the proposal for a development much larger than Brent Cross, the second sits already sits in North and West London Light Railway. Indeed, much of the text in Brent Cross#Transport_development duplicates that in North and West London Light Railway so I'll see if I can make the middle work without- the lengthy introduction about the London mayor- the case for light rail- the detail on the North and West London Light Railway. NebY (talk) 21:29, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: NebY, thanks for removing the duplicated information. The text in the transport development section looks much better. Some of the article still has poorly written text and looks like a blog with promotional images. I'll have a think about how state the facts in an encyclopedic way. Grim23★ 23:52, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Nice work, Grim23. That's let me focus on the Planning Application section. The substance isn't much changed but I've tried to make it less bloggish and tendentious. Net effect still isn't uttery neutral (do you want to try to find who's commented positively and had something substantial to say? Not easy) but at least has council and developers on one side, a selection of objectors on other. NebY (talk) 23:06, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think the developers point of view is the profit motive and the council's is the usual corrupt politics, but I think it will be difficult to find sources that directly show this. This is why I dislike the debate format especially in the lead. I'll try to find out more about the developer(s) and the exact role of the council. Grim23★ 17:07, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adverts 

message: Is the Conflict of Interest tag still appropriate? There has been much copy-editing, rewriting, restructuring and additional material and the influence of a single major contributor is no longer so dominant. We may run up against the law of diminishing returns if we try to do much more. NebY (talk) 22:18, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, sensible plan. Grim23★ 20:40, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Conflict of Interest

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Brent Cross. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100329085259/http://www.brentcrosscricklewood.com:80/pages/05transport/transport.html to http://www.brentcrosscricklewood.com/pages/05transport/transport.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:04, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Brent Cross. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101120183013/http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard/article-23892753-green-light-for-the-pound-45bn-rebuilding-of-brent-cross.do to http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard/article-23892753-green-light-for-the-pound-45bn-rebuilding-of-brent-cross.do
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.brentcrosscricklewood.com/pages/05transport/transport.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120206213955/http://www.barnet.gov.uk/index/environment-planning/regeneration-and-strategic-development/regeneration-projects/regeneration-cricklewood.htm to http://www.barnet.gov.uk/index/environment-planning/regeneration-and-strategic-development/regeneration-projects/regeneration-cricklewood.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:34, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Brent Cross. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100329083155/http://www.brentcrosscricklewood.com/ to http://www.brentcrosscricklewood.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:03, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified