Talk:Hurricane Ivan/Archive 1

message: :Returns a 404 error. --Goobergunch|? 05:20, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cited 

message: I think the layout of the Hurricane Frances infobox on the right side of the screen is professional and organized.  If no one objects, I'll match this page with that one.
As of right now, Ivan's infobox is kind of unproportional.  Besides, shouldn't the track of a current storm go near the top?
:I think the one here is better, although I'd rather have no infobox whatsoever. -- Cyrius|✎ 23:16, 7 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox layout 

message: Someone has again taken it upon themselves to change mi/h to mph (but I guess km/h is okay?) We need a standard on this, I guess. --Golbez 00:32, Sep 10, 2004 (UTC)
:It's the same person, who seems to consider all changes minor. -- Cyrius|✎ 00:59, 10 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: "KPH" seems to get more complaints that "MPH". Or so it seems to me, at least. *shrug*  Maybe the pump should be asked. --Golbez 02:04, Sep 10, 2004 (UTC)
Here is what the NHC sends out in its advisories (I guess most people here have seen this): IVAN IS MOVING TOWARD THE WEST-NORTHWEST NEAR 13 MPH...20 KM/HR. THIS MOTION IS EXPECTED TO BRING THE CENTER OF IVAN TO NEAR JAMAICA TONIGHT. — Awolf002 13:46, 10 Sep 2004 (UTC)

text: A more authoritative source than Weatherbug. ;) Maybe we should use that. Or maybe we should be bold and use our own damn units! Let's start recording this bad boy in cubits. ;) --Golbez 15:14, Sep 10, 2004 (UTC)
Right! I say go with NHC. I will post an item at the Village pump and we can see what the feedback looks like. Awolf002 15:35, 10 Sep 2004 (UTC)

text: Nearly all units for tropical cyclone articles are in mph and km/h.  These may seem a bit inconsistent, but...well...I don't really care except that it would be a huge pain to change them all. — jdorje (talk) 06:55, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: BTW, any discussion of units should be done or at least mentioned on the wikiproject talk page. — jdorje (talk) 07:08, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  mi/h or mph 

message: Considering the lackluster performances of the previous Ivans, I think it's time we moved this one to Hurricane Ivan. Unfortunately, there's a page in the way. Are any of you admins, or should we take this to the pump? --Golbez 15:37, Sep 10, 2004 (UTC)
:I am. I'll take care of it once I've finished some housekeeping elsewhere. Might be 5pm EDT by then, but probably not. -- Cyrius|✎ 18:32, 10 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Going to clean up some links to the "(2004)" redirect now. -- Cyrius|✎ 19:20, 10 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moving article 

message: I do not like the new "Advisory" sction at all!! I'm going to remove it, since I do not believe it has a place in an encyclopedic article. We've got links to the NHC for this!! Awolf002 15:01, 11 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Quite agreed. The only reason for "current status" at all is because there's really no other way to do it until after the fact. -- Cyrius|✎ 15:43, 11 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Advisory 

message: At least thats what the NWS says.  Ivan is sixth in terms of minimum central pressure, 912 mb, not in terms of winds (although it seems like it would be high on the list). Tom 00:39, Sep 12, 2004 (UTC)
:I thought 165 seemed low for a record breaker, but then again, there aren't many Cat 5s, let alone 165+ ones. But that's probably more accurate. --Golbez 00:50, Sep 12, 2004 (UTC)
::Not that 165 should be treated lightly either.  And btw: thanks for cleaning up my writing in the article.  I was having problems figuring out how to word it best. :) Tom 02:13, Sep 12, 2004 (UTC)
The current record for wind speed is 190 mph, from both Hurricane Camille and Hurricane Allen. I've got to get around to writing a program to parse and display the NHC's best track file so I can pull up the statistics on such things myself. They seem to keep coming up. -- Cyrius|✎ 04:08, 12 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sixth Lowest Pressure, not sixth strongest in terms of winds 

message: Nothing against you people in Florida, but I'm not liking how Ivan's failing to turn. Might have to bug out Tuesdayish if it doesn't. -- Cyrius|✎ 05:44, 13 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ugh 

message: This afternoon, Ivan's going to join the three way tie for third place on "Hurricanes that have spent the most time at Category 5". I don't see any reason to think it won't jump ahead of them either, although I doubt it'll catch up to the second place holder, 1980's Hurricane "Dog", with 2.5 days at Cat 5. Allen's 3 days seems right out. I'm hoping I'm not wrong about that. -- Cyrius|✎ 17:33, 13 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another record 

message: While all tropical cyclones fluctuate in intensity, major hurricanes do so much more often. This is largely due to eyewall replacement cycles, a process that doesn't occur in weaker storms. Just so everyone knows why the NHC keeps mentioning it and it keeps popping up in the article. -- Cyrius|✎ 22:06, 13 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intensity fluctuations 

message: ...and reached "unprecedented" intensity at low latitudes...
Forgive me if I've missed something, but why is "unprecedented" in quotes?  If it's a quote, what's the source?  If it's unsourced, how do we know it's unprecendented?  I certainly haven't been following the storm as much as the rest of you, but seeing that in the first paragraph of the article stands out. Beginning 22:35, Sep 15, 2004 (UTC)
:Those of us in the know know .. well .. think .. that it was from an NOAA/NHC discussion or advisory. Those quotes have irked me for a while, but since I knew .. well.. thought I knew where it was from, I didn't touch them. But yeah, that needs to be dealt with. --Golbez 22:40, Sep 15, 2004 (UTC)
:Bring it up again when things have calmed down, I'll go dig up the source. -- Cyrius|✎ 14:07, 16 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: "Unprecedented"

message: Gulf Power representatives have told my friends as well as my family that if power is knocked down, it will not be restored for at least two weeks. I know first-hand accounts are not the best citations...but I figured someone needed to know, if it should find its way into the article. (This is for Northwest Florida) Mike H 06:04, Sep 16, 2004 (UTC)
:Sounds about right to me from previous experience with lesser storms. -- Cyrius|✎ 14:09, 16 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Gulf Power

message: Can the news about overflowing Lake Pontchartrain be backed up with a reliable source? I do not find any mention of it in the news. Awolf002 13:10, 16 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: There are reports that a few low-lying areas got flooded by decent-sized waves coming off the lake. Nothing about flooding New Orleans. I removed the statement because it's not the sort of thing the press would pass over. -- Cyrius|✎ 14:04, 16 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lake Pontchartrain 

message: Does anyone know if this bridge is accessible?
:Is that in Destin? It may be. I don't know. Mike H 23:39, Sep 16, 2004 (UTC)
:Given that the Sunshine Skyway Bridge is in St. Petersburg, there should be no Ivan-related accessibility concerns. -- Cyrius|✎ 23:58, 16 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sunshine Skyway Bridge 

message: I'm a Wiki n00b, so perhaps someone may like to post this to the article: http://www.wunderground.com.nyud.net:8090/hurricane/ivan/ivan_zoom_radar.gif
:Wunderground claims copyright on their materials. So don't do it. -- Cyrius|✎ 01:44, 18 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Landfall Animation 

message: I'd say most of the issues in the previous featured article page have been addressed, so is another one on tap?  Perhaps a peer review first? --tomf688(talk) July 9, 2005 04:32 (UTC)
:Agreed. Let's do peer review first though; make sure the pool is full before we dive in ;). The one thing I'd like to see is a much better description of recovery efforts, not just damage. -- Hurricane Eric - my dropsonde - archive 00:58, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revive featured article nomination? 

message: Should the ACE of 69.95 (* 10^4 Kt^2) be noted in the article. Where does 69.95 stand? What is the record? crandles 22:04, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Supposedly Ivan is the highest-ACE storm of all time. Jdorje 23:00, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  ACE = 69.95 

message: The article is really great and in the Spanish edition is pretty mediocre, this is going for translation juan andrés 05:45, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article will be translated into Spanish 

message: So, wait. Ivan lost his southern eyewall? Does that mean he lost his tropical characteristics? What does that mean? You're tellin me Ivan was America's strongest coldfront at landfall? Cyclone1 18:07, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ivan didn't 'lose' anything, except a little intensity. The thing about the eyewall means that there was just a big freakin' hole in the southern half of the eyewall. Ivan was still a warm-core hurricane at landfall. You don't have to have an eye to be a tropical cyclone. Look at 98% of all the tropical storms that never reached hurricane intensity. They didn't have an eye, but they were very tropical. The article tropical cyclone will tell you more. Also see extratropical storm -- §HurricaneERIC§Damagesarchive 05:04, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding the Eye 

message: Does that really need to be that extravagent? All that should be listed is by country (or states for the US). More detail can go in subsections (like having a Leeward Islands section and mentioning that 1 died in Barbados and 1 in Tobago), but having a table that big really clutters things. Hurricanehink 16:21, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.  It is way too much information. — jdorje (talk) 19:17, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death table 

message: Info on this has to be included if this article is going to be the FA that it should be. -- §HurricaneERIC§Damagesarchive 22:59, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recovery 

message: Katrina should be mentioned in the discussion of 4th highest US damages; and presumably other 2005 storms should be to. I wonder if it would be better to not use the "Ivan was the 3rd most costly US hurricane (now 4th)" format and switch it to give the emphasis to the at-the-present status (and have the at-the-time in brackets)?--Nilfanion (talk) 23:38, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It might be better to find a way to remove parentheses completely. I'm giving the article a copyedit, so I'll try to address that as well. Titoxd(?!? - help us) 01:34, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  2005AHS consequences 

message: I created a records/naming section - Irene style to try and relieve some of the stress on the Storm History. The big change which is needed here I think is to change the Impact to a by-US State breakdown and move the impact info out of the history, which will bring that section down to a sensible length.--Nilfanion (talk) 22:45, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure that section is needed at all; the hydrological records section should be removed completely, IMO, and the rest can be blended in quite easily in the impact. That said, the damages should be moved from history to impact, as you say. Titoxd(?!? - help us) 22:50, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah and theres the ACE - that should go completely; I'm not sure about it - get the impact section sorted then remerge it back. I'm looking at this with an eye to Wilma too, that storm has exactly the same layout problems only moreso. I think a lot of the storm history should be moved - a lot of "city X suffered TS winds" is impact. There is some aftermath info too, though it is hard to see currently, the Venezuelan crop things for a start.--Nilfanion (talk) 22:53, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

text: On second thought, that makes the TOC very long, and it also gives the impression that the article is US-centric (which it's not). I'd say it's better if they're merged back into "United States" again. Titoxd(?!? - help us) 23:36, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Its a temporary thing - split it up then remerge; we know the right bits are in the right place. Having said that I'm not sure if the US info justifies a by state split — is that because the US didn't get that big an impact or is it indicative of a lack of information (Alabama should have more info shouldn't it?)--Nilfanion (talk) 23:42, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Having them split would emphasize what is needed. In addition, it would allow for better organization. Alabama should be the biggest section, but it currently isn't. Hurricanehink (talk) 14:38, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

text: I've also moved the intensity record back into the storms history, commented out the wave record for now, retirement into aftermath and removed the ACE references as trivia. Just the impact/aftermath to sort out now?--Nilfanion (talk) 21:05, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Yay! The article doesn't look horrible and disorganized now. Hurricanehink (talk) 21:22, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Should we wait for Eric to come back, he said he had some significant info for this article? It's gone on the back burner anyway...--Nilfanion (talk) 10:05, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: He said he won't be back until after June. If anyone wants to give it a rewrite or something, you can go ahead, and Eric can just add his info when he comes back. Hurricanehink (talk) 13:30, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately my hard drive crashed shortly before I left so that information is now gone and it may be awhile before I could get it off. I could rewrite it. It was a section on the recovery. Wait a minute...Hink, didn't I post it on you talk page a while back, asking you to review it? -- §HurricaneERIC§ archive 18:57, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think it was on my talk, but I don't remember exactly which archive it went into, and I have to run, so I can't really look for it right now. Good to see you back, though. Titoxd(?!?) 19:01, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Heh. Good thing I never archive my talk page by moving it...  Titoxd(?!?) 19:03, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reorganization 

message: Should the deaths from Canada be included? The storm, which was definetly part of Ivan (the old mid-level circulation), caused 2 direct deaths and 4 indirect deaths. Of course, I think that the system that went to Canada was the original Ivan, and the thing in the Gulf should have been Matthew (or Nicole, depends on if they classified the tropical storm behind Lisa). Hurricanehink (talk) 20:06, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That is debatable. My opinion is the same as yours that the Gulf regenesis should have been TD14/Matthew and that "Ivan" went northeast (it is also a natural track, not a loop-de-loop), but it is not really classified as such by the NHC and it would create essentially a "branch" in the article. Since it is officially classified as a non-tropical remnant low, it would naturally be considered an extension of this article - but that southern loop with the detached surface remnants throws a curve. IMO, the damage and deaths there should indeed be included, but others will disagree. CrazyC83 03:35, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The hurricane database would be a bit different if we treated a new surface cyclogenesis based on the old-mid level low as the same name.  The Allison (1989) track would move off the east coast, never to return.  Karl (1998) would be the latter part of Hermine's track.  Dennis (1999) track would end, and what struck North Carolina a week later would have been Emily.  And so on. Thegreatdr 19:22, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canada 

message: Was Ivan the most southerly Category 5 hurricane on record in the Atlantic (13.7 degrees north)? I can't think of any other Cat. 5s which occured that far south. If so, I think it deserves a mention in the article. Pobbie Rarr 16:22, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category 5 record? 

message: "Following the storm, federal aid poured into the hardest hit areas. In the United States, over $1 billion was spent on relief and recovery alone. Thousands of fallen trees had to be removed. The wreckage was stacked in piles across the devestated areas in Florida and Alabama, some as much as two stories high. Church mission groups, Habitat For Humanity and other non-profit relief organizations lined up to do whatever they could to aid in the rebuilding process. Civil engineers carefully laid out plans for reconstructing the terribly eroded beaches. They pumped sand from the sea bed onto the shore and gradually built the beach back up. 
The US also sent financial aid to the Caribbean nations affected by Ivan. Nations throughout the region worked to support one another in the recovery efforts. On Grenada, for example, international relief crews and volunteers flew in to assist in the clearing of debris and the distribution of supplies. In the Cayman Islands, a relief fund was set up to collect donations and organize assistance for stricken families. On Barbados, the government initiated a housing recovery project in which three federal agencies worked to rebuild homes that were damaged or destroyed by the storm. These efforts sped up the rebuilding process that was only just finishing up at the start of 2006."
I wrote this months ago hoping to provide information on the recovery efforts. I had some trouble tracking down the websites I used but I was able to come up with most of it. A couple news sites didn't support the pages anymore so I can't get the specific article where the Grenada info came from. I also came up empty on the Habitat for Humanity stuff. Maybe it's on their website and I just didn't see it, but I know it's out there. If people on the hurricane project could help me track those other sources down, I'd be extremely grateful. I think this info would greatly improve the article. The stuff I have sources for can be added right away, but I want to find that other stuff, I know it's out there. I'd love to hear feedback. The sources I found are: , , , fact about the trees is in the NHC report (section C, paragraph 2). -- §HurricaneERIC§ archive 06:44, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nice. Feel free to add it in, and for the sentences without sources, you can blank them out, using . Hurricanehink (talk) 14:41, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New information 

message: *Mobile/Pensacola report
*Jackson, MS report
*New Orleans, LA report
*Tallahassee, FL report on tornado
*Tampa Bay, FL report
*Huntsville, AL report
*Nashville, TN report
*Peachtree City, GA report
*Greenville-Spartanburg, SC report
*Greenville-Spartanburg, SC report
*Raleigh, NC report
*Mount Holly, NJ report
*Upton, NY report
*State College, PA report
*Binghamton, NY report
*Binghamton, NY report
*Houston, TX report
These should be included in the article. Hurricanehink (talk) 17:35, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Technically they are, since those reports are written for inclusion into the TPC report.  Thegreatdr 00:22, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Ah, didn't know that. Hurricanehink (talk) 01:04, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NWS reports 

message: I haven't done much editing to wikipedia, so I'll leave this to others, but Hurricane Ivan did not make landfall in Orange Beach, Alabama, it hit Gulf Shores, Alabama.  This is a quote from the NHC Tropical Cyclone Report linked at the end of the article:  "Ivan weakened only slowly and made landfall as a 105 kt hurricane (category 3 on the SSHS; see Figure 2c and Figure 3b.) at approximately 0650 UTC 16 September, just west of Gulf Shores, Alabama"  It says west of Gulf Shores.  Orange Beach is east of Gulf Shores, between Gulf Shores and Pensacola, Florida.  Gulf Shores extends west to the bay.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.176.183.57 (talk) 19:35, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Landfall 

message: I was doing some research, and found that around 117 tornados were associated with the landfall of Ivan. How about an article Tornado Outbreak of Hurricane Ivan? Juliancolton 14:38, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: tornado outbreak

message: ...if we collectively cannot fill out the 11 fact tags scattered throughout the page.  Also, the reference section is in at least 3 mixed formats, which is problematic.  The text needs work also; I fixed several grammar and spelling problems on the page when trying to fill out the reference section.  Thegreatdr (talk) 05:00, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've completely fixed the format problem in the reference section, but two fact tags remain.  There are also some tense problems in some sections of the article, which I've been slowly weeding out.  Thegreatdr (talk) 22:28, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reassessment coming on February 8

message: Since there have been no further comments either on the tropical cyclone or Hurricane Ivan talk pages, I'll take that as agreement.  I'm listing the article for reassessment.  Thegreatdr (talk) 16:25, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:GAR|Good article reassessment]]

message: As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Meteorology and atmospheric sciences" articles. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I have made several minor corrections throughout the article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2005. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. It would also be beneficial to go through the article and update all of the access dates of the inline citations and fix any dead links. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 21:32, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Sweeps Review: Pass

message: Shouldn't the picture atop the article be of the storm path rather than an image from space?  From space, all hurricanes look pretty much alike and no information is imparted to the reader from a generic-hurricane-from-the-ISS-photo.  Tempshill (talk) 01:24, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope, all tropical cyclone articles have the track map in the Storm history and the satellite image in the infobox. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 03:15, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Consider my question suitably rephrased to encompass all tropical cyclone articles, then.  Tempshill (talk) 17:27, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

text: No.  Tennis expert (talk) 20:13, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no reason to make such a change. Satellite images give the reader an idea of what the storm looked like with regards to size, shape, and relation to land or geographical locations. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 20:18, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd argue that the last point you make is far better expressed with a storm path map, and the first two points you make are not very important.  I don't think the satellite photo imparts much information at all.  As I see it the only reason to have the satellite photo up top is that it's a thousand times prettier.  I have mixed feelings about it, myself.  Tempshill (talk) 22:07, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo at top 

message: A freind who works in insurance gave me a "IVAN MEMENTO" or a piece of handpainted hurricane debris - free flying galvanized metal roofing and cut telephone wire..... Maybe worth a pic on the article? Itfc+canes=me (talk) 18:23, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There is certainly no harm in taking the picture. I would be interested in seeing it even if we don't end up putting it in the article. Plasticup T/C 00:24, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Hurricane Ivan Merchandise

message: Why is Ivan on the most destructive U.S. hurricanes list? I thought it was knocked off from Gustav and Ike in 2008. Wasn't it? Hurricanes Charley, Ike, Wilma, Andrew, and Katrina should be here, not Ivan, so why was it added to this list? 76.235.205.44 (talk) 00:15, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Most destructive U.S. hurricanes?

message: Although this did not actually occur, Ivan was originally predicted to hit Pennsylvania to the same extent that Agnes had back in 1972. I know this because I was growing up in Riverside, PA (part of Northumberland County and Danville Area School District) when it happened. I initially heard, at a Scout meeting as the hurricane was approaching North America, that all of Riverside except the high ground areas (where I thankfully lived) was going to be flooded up to the rooftops. The Mysterious El Willstro (talk) 20:55, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: As always, shouldn't the Article mention this? The Mysterious El Willstro (talk) 20:58, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: We would need a source first. --Golbez (talk) 21:24, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unfulfilled prediction 

message: Should it be mentioned somewhere that this hurricane is often known to locals who live through it as "Ivan the Terrible."  I was thinking that the article could say something along the lines of, "Known as Ivan the Terrible (after the Tsar of same name) amongst those who lived through it."  Emperor001 (talk) 23:23, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Ivan the Terrible

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Hurricane Ivan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110716141841/http://www.pema.state.pa.us/pema/cwp/view.asp?a=3&q=261264&pp=12&n=1 to http://www.pema.state.pa.us/pema/cwp/view.asp?a=3&q=261264&pp=12&n=1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:05, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Hurricane Ivan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/aboutnames.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:00, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Hurricane Ivan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120927230759/http://www.wmo.int/pages/prog/www/tcp/documents/FinalHC27Report-English.pdf to http://www.wmo.int/pages/prog/www/tcp/documents/FinalHC27Report-English.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050527200125/http://usinfo.state.gov/wh/Archive/2005/Feb/16-896856.html to http://usinfo.state.gov/wh/Archive/2005/Feb/16-896856.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080502145813/http://www.vdem.state.va.us/newsroom/history/tornado.cfm to http://www.vdem.state.va.us/newsroom/history/tornado.cfm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:25, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 10 external links on Hurricane Ivan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110927131019/http://www.globalaging.org/armedconflict/countryreports/americas/fema.htm to http://www.globalaging.org/armedconflict/countryreports/americas/fema.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070304025251/http://www.dnet.net/News/ivan/peeksCreek.asp to http://dnet.net/News/ivan/peeksCreek.asp
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070516130053/http://www.geology.enr.state.nc.us/Landslide%20web%20version/Geologic_hazards_landslide_show/Landslides_Peeks_Creek_Debris_Flow_2004.htm to http://www.geology.enr.state.nc.us/Landslide%20web%20version/Geologic_hazards_landslide_show/Landslides_Peeks_Creek_Debris_Flow_2004.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060501083606/http://www.atl.ec.gc.ca/weather/hurricane/storm04.html to http://www.atl.ec.gc.ca/weather/hurricane/storm04.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100606151309/http://www.fema.gov/news/newsrelease.fema?id=16881 to http://www.fema.gov/news/newsrelease.fema?id=16881
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050307044810/http://www.doacs.state.fl.us/press/2004/11172004_2.html to http://www.doacs.state.fl.us/press/2004/11172004_2.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120211081018/http://www.fema.gov/news/newsrelease.fema?id=18831 to http://www.fema.gov/news/newsrelease.fema?id=18831
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110917153010/http://www.fema.gov/news/newsrelease.fema?id=14583 to http://www.fema.gov/news/newsrelease.fema?id=14583
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120106180742/http://www.fema.gov/news/newsrelease.fema?id=15269 to http://www.fema.gov/news/newsrelease.fema?id=15269
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150527031409/http://www.sunherald.com/2015/05/17/6232475/us-says-gulf-oil-spill-could-last.html to http://www.sunherald.com/2015/05/17/6232475/us-says-gulf-oil-spill-could-last.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:09, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hurricane Ivan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050528112607/http://www.cdera.org/cunews/news/article_610.php to http://www.cdera.org/cunews/news/article_610.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:04, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Hurricane Ivan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070103233018/http://www.wired.com/news/business/0%2C1367%2C65000%2C00.html to https://www.wired.com/news/business/0%2C1367%2C65000%2C00.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080516194130/http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0%2C1282%2C64952%2C00.html to https://www.wired.com/news/technology/0%2C1282%2C64952%2C00.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:35, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hurricane Ivan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Replaced archive link http://webarchive.loc.gov/all/20050417011035/http://media.graytvinc.com/video/tornado.wmv with https://web.archive.org/web/20161230000000/http://media.graytvinc.com/video/tornado.wmv on http://media.graytvinc.com/video/tornado.wmv
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:28, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified