lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:National Production Authority

message: I would love to know how the National Production Authority had the authority to ban the production of color television equipment, given the national defense mission stated in this article. I wonder what other acitivities it banned.
*It did not ban color TV. Its parent organization, the Office of Defense Mobilization (ODM), did. It had that authority because the federal law under which the the ODM was established (the Defense Production Act) permitted the government to regulate manufacturing—even to the point of shutting down production of goods and services the government felt were detrimental to or which diverted resources from national defense efforts. Rather than "wasteful" competing color TV systems, the government settled on one. - 1965Tim 01:20, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Bridge

message: What happened to the documentary about the Scientology group?
—Preceding unsigned comment added by  65.33.4.214  (talk • contribs)  13:02:51, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Since this is redirect "The Bridge (film)", let it redirect to the film section within the disambiguation page The Bridge#In film, since there are quite a few films. --Lexein (talk) 12:36, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect 

message: Seems redlinks are not discouraged in DAB pages - see WP:DAB. --Lexein (talk) 19:55, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redlinks 

message: TV and film are quite similar. Could TV be moved up so it's directly below film? TinyEdit (talk) 00:28, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move TV section near film? 

message: TV and film are quite similar. Could TV be moved up so it's directly below film? TinyEdit (talk) 00:28, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move TV section near film? 

message: I'll assume this page is supposed to cover singular and plural
Please add entries for
* The Bridges, shopping centre in England
* The Bridges (band), U.S. rock band
* The Bridges, Calgary, urban development in Bridgeland, Calgary
to the list
-- 67.70.35.44 (talk) 14:45, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's better to add these to Bridges (disambiguation) – The Bridges is already listed there and there's no need to list it on multiple pages. that page is linked from this – so I've gone ahead and added them.--JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 15:12, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Change request
Template talk:Judge Dredd

message: It would be good if a section were added to the template called 'Creators' including John Wagner and Carlos Ezquerra. I don't know how to edit templates. --85.211.32.31 (talk) 04:00, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Creation

message: Red links are fine, there should be red links to encourage articles to be made (if the subject is notable) but their place is not in a template.*Treker (talk) 20:36, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Red links
Talk:Nikki S. Lee

message: Nikki Lee has works in the collections of the Met Museum and the Hirshhorn.  She's definitely notable.  I'll try to dig up a link or two. --AlbertHerring 20:15, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Would be great to know why she changed galleries.--Aichik (talk) 18:30, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gallery switch 

message: — Assignment last updated by Poppyprint (talk) 23:00, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Korean Visual Culture between Tradition and Contemporaneity
Talk:Iron Maiden (Marvel Comics)

message: The Iron Maiden is a master assassin, horticulturalist and spy. She wears a lightweight but strong metal suit that protects her from impacts, bullets, quiche and energy weapons.
Really?  She needs armor to protect herself from custard?
Go4thAndDie (talk) 14:58, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Powers and abilities
Talk:Finis (short story)

message: Finis is a village in Romania, County of Bihor, 2km distance from the town of [Beius]. It has nothing to do with any science fiction novel, especially if it's linked from the wikipage of Beius. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.196.243.86 (talk • contribs) 20:21, 14 October 2006
:I've fixed this by moving this article to "Finis (short story)" and creating the Finis article with the above info. Hu 20:50, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title clash 

message: The short story is notable enough that it was included in an anthology published in 1999, and Project Gutenberg chose to include it in their online presentations.  I am removing the tag that questions the notability. Hu 20:53, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: This page is placed in the category "Post-Apocalyptic fiction" -- I think it would be better categorized in "Apocalyptic fiction", since the action of the story takes place during the cataclysmic end of civilization, rather than after civilization has already ended.  -- Soundout (talk) 14:05, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Post-Apocalyptic fiction versus Apocalyptic fiction
Talk:Nantucket Blob

message: ...to see connections between these kinds of explanations and those proferred by Charles Fort in his first work The Book of the Damned, which I'm transcribing to Wikisource.  I'm surprised that no one has suggested the blobsters to be nostoc, considering how they're all claimed to be whale biological matter. --Chr.K. 14:50, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: I'm beginning...
Talk:Grain boundary

message: Can this page be expanded to include sub-grain boundaries or should that be a separate page? What is the difference between a low-angle grain boundary and a sub-grain boundary? Mikenorton 20:32, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops, haven't been keeping up with wikipedia for a while. Sub-grain is a synonym for low-angle so the article already discusses them. I ought to make that clear. What this article really needs are subsections or other pages discussing the practical and industrial aspects of the properties of boundaries. Slinky Puppet 19:59, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:The Cat Creeps (1930 film)

message: I have moved the title back to The Cat Creeps. From all studies I've seen of the film it does not appear to have been released under that extended title or reported by that anywhere. (AFI, published books, etc.) The film title has been moved back. Andrzejbanas (talk) 20:36, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Title
Talk:Emīls Dārziņš

message: To imitate what piece and composer was he accused of? --Leonardo T. Oliveira (talk) 01:47, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Plagiarism
Talk:Second Sea Lord and Deputy Chief of Naval Staff

message: Immediate disclosure: I work for the Royal Navy digital team
Please see the attached photo which is a more recent image of the Second Sea Lord. This image is cleared to use under the OGL license. Please consider using this image rather than the image currently in place as it is out of date.
Many thanks,
--AlexRoyalNavy (talk) 10:48, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updated image available 

message: Needs a revamp please use https://www.royalnavy.mod.uk/-/media/royal-navy-responsive/documents/useful-resources/navy-list.pdf?la=en-gb
Thanks
Sammartinlai (talk) 06:48, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Offices under Second Sea Lord
Talk:Controller of the Navy (Royal Navy)

message: ACNS Capability and Chief of Staff are now separate according to Colin Mackie's list.
ACNS Capability: Rear Admiral Hugh Beard
Chief of Staff Navy Command: Commodore Paul Beattie.
BlueD954 (talk) 06:06, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: link http://www.gulabin.com/armynavy/pdf/Admirals-Current.pdf
BlueD954 (talk) 07:09, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  ACNS Capability and Chief of Staff are now separate 

message: Is Rear Admiral James Parkin.2401:7400:4008:9843:ACDD:9953:35B0:320B (talk) 19:12, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Holder
Talk:Naik (military rank)

message: Hello fellow editor @Necrothesp, I noticed you recently reverted an edit of mine, and since I do not want to editwar, I've opened this discussion. I think it might be worth linking to the article you're mentioning but there is no need for the adjective. We could instead put it like this if you'd like: 
 
PadFoot2008 (talk) 10:34, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not really bothered, although I should point out that "British Indian Army" is used in many other articles as a descriptive term. I completely agree it was just the Indian Army (and I've made this point many times myself), but when both the modern Indian Army and the historic Indian Army are mentioned it becomes more complicated to distinguish them. I would actually prefer it if the article British Indian Army was renamed, as we don't usually make names up on Wikipedia. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:38, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: If you aren't bothered, I think should perform the change. Besides, I too think it would be great and much encyclopedic if the article British Indian Army itself was renamed. Thanks. PadFoot2008 (talk) 14:09, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indian Army
Talk:Kapitänleutnant

message: In the article, they write that the English translation of "Kapitänleutnant" is "Captain lieutenant". However, this is not necessarily correct. There are ranks in the German armed forces with a comparable naming scheme, e.g. "Oberstleutnant" or "Generalleutnant". "Oberstleutnant" is composed of "Oberst", meaning "Colonel", and "Leutnant", meaning "Lieutenant", but is usually not translated to "Colonel lieutenant", but to "Lieutenant Colonel". Comparably, "Generalleutnant", composed of "General" and "Leutnant", is usually translated to "Lieutenant General", not "General lieutenant". A third rank with a naming scheme that is in some way comparable is "Generalmajor" which is translated to "Major General" rather than to "General major".
So, one should assume that "Kapitänleutnant" is to be translated to "Lieutenant Captain" rather than to "Captain lieutenant". Bareil (talk) 16:43, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  English translation: Captain lieutenant or Lieutenant Captain?
Talk:Second-in-command

message: Dear Sir: I have contacted your office before re: the ideal property location for a new Family Dollar Store. I had also contacted Dolllar General and they built a new store no more than 8 miles from my property. There is definitely the traffic and population for a new store as the property is located at the junction of three (3) primary major highways and several populate communities. It’s approximately 11 miles from two small towns both which have Dollar General and Family Dollar stores. 
please contact me at:  Dicey Combs, 
10116 Highway 30 West; 
Booneville, KY  41314 for a survey or further information.  
Thank you for your time and prompt response in advance Dicey combs (talk) 17:14, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need for NEW Family Dollar Store
Talk:Junior officer

message: This page could probably be deleted and the information incorporated with pages dedicated to military ranks. The citations are almost all for Canadian officers, but the article mentions U.S. officers. Also, the information is incorrect. Specifically, junior officers are a naval term, while the other branches use company grade officers as the equivalent; also, in the Navy and Coast Guard, junior officer refers to O-4 and below, not O-3 and below (the confusion may be because the other services elevate O-4 and above and field grade officers - equivalent to senior officer in the naval services).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.14.73.51 (talk) 11:18, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
Talk:Generalissimus of the Soviet Union

message: So the difference between a Field Marshal and Generalissimo is... what exactly? Generalissimo can automatically override a Field Marshal if one does not agree with the other on a certain scenario? (I ask because I don't know if a nation could have more than one Field Marshal and so possibly a higher rank is needed to coordinate them).
-G  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.117.158.83 (talk) 16:25, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Field Marshal is inferior to Marshal, Marshal is inferior to Marshal of Soviet Union, Marshal of Soviet Union is inferior to Generalissimus.--Dojarca (talk) 09:44, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Grand Marshall is also in there above Marshall and similar to an "of" rank, I mean generally (no pun intended) I don't mean specifically a rank anywhere ever extant in the Soviet Union, but as ranks go... Also to note is the strange fact in the United States that the General of the Army is a rank below the General of the Armies, as if there became more than one U.S. Army just for a new rank's benefit. "Generalissimus" is always the highest rank, similar to the 'commander in chief' but without the civil power. "-issimus" means 'highest' in German "Oberste" meant highest too. Hitler I believe had a term coined to him which I cannot find googling for the life of me that included "Armee" and "Oberste" putting him in a high rank which isn't yet here on Wikipedia's list of WWII German ranks. 4.242.174.112 (talk) 12:31, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: So...

message: The article mixes "generalissimus" and "generalissimo". Are those two terms interchangeable? Should one replace the other? -Mys_721tx (talk) 19:07, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mixing usage 

message: I think thе claim "Stalin refused to officially approve the rank and died with the rank of Marshal of the Soviet Union" is unfounded. Anecdotes are known about previous proposals and their fate but the 1945 decision on creating the rank of generalissimus and granting it to Stalin was final and effective. It did not require Stalin's further approval once it had been made but of course making it required his approval in advance. Other anecdotes are known about that Stalin did not like the planned uniform and insignia but it has nothing to do with him having the rank. I cannot see any source that firmly founds this claim. I only see several possible reasons of depicting Stalin as a humble servant of the people.
peyerk (talk) 09:40, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did Stalin refuse? 

message: There is strong contradiction between this article and russian one. Russian says that the rank wasn't rejected. 192.114.1.67 (talk) 13:13, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  contradiction
Talk:Commandant General Royal Marines

message: Marked no on class B criterion 2. The history should be more important with the double duty status currently appearing above the section. The history needs more detail. Created in 1943, it seems like there should be more out there on this topic. Obviously it had something to do with WWII. Who pushed it through? What was the reason? How did it structurally differ from the previous arrangement? Timothyjosephwood (talk) 17:26, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: http://www.janes.com/article/79465/uk-amphibious-headquarters-to-disappear-in-merger
Sammartinlai (talk) 10:13, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  This may be of interest 

message: http://www.gulabin.com/armynavy/pdf/Admirals-Current.pdf
"Major-General Matthew J. Holmes" but don't add yet until Royal Navy releases news.
BlueD954 (talk) 14:26, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. See Matthew Holmes (Royal Marines officer). Thanks, Dormskirk (talk) 15:33, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Commandant June 2019
Talk:Jesse Frederick

message: I was just wondering if this article was written by Jesse Frederick.  It's longer than the article for Abraham Lincoln, so I guess Jesse Fredrick must have done something besides write a couple of TV theme songs.  Surely, that's not what this article is about?  Is it?  That's what he did?  Wow.  98.194.39.86 (talk) 04:44, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jesse Frederick 

message: This entire article was copypasted from Google Books. — Wyliepedia 17:24, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copypasting
Talk:House of 1000 Corpses (song)

message: I am almost certain that I recognize the voice of KSTP-TV's Jeff Passolt as one of the newsanchors being sampled on the song (I assume these samples are from the H1KC movie).  Can anyone confirm this?
Wpell (talk) 07:37, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: ==
Talk:Sergeant major instructor

message: I've edited the section to remove the implication that ACF AIs act as military personnel - this is emphatically not the case.  They are civilians, not subject to the Service Discipline acts even when wearing uniform - which has to display distictive ACF rank slides.  This is made absolutly clear in the ACF manual and other publications.  Their appointment is not 'equivalent to' a WO1 or 2 in the Army any more than the 'ranks' of their cadets are equivalent to army ranks.
ACF AIs do a very good job but they are no more members of the military than say Scout Leaders, they are valuable (paid) volunteers in an MoD sponsored youth organisation.  To quote from the ACF article in here:
"The Army Cadet Force (ACF) is a British youth organisation that offers progressive training in a multitude of the subjects from military training to adventurous training (such as Outward Bound) and first aid, at the same time as promoting achievement, discipline, and good citizenship, to boys and girls aged 12 to 18 year olds and 9 months."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tragino (talk • contribs) 14:25, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  ACF AIs
Talk:Halloween (Dave Matthews Band song)

message: "Halloween" was the only song frequently played live by the band before its LP album release"
This is just flatly untrue. Most of the songs from the first two albums were played heavily before their LP releases. Technically, the same goes for all the Lillywhite Sessions that made it to Busted Stuff. And Hello Again. Even if this was supposed to refer only to BTCS songs, which is not clear if it's the case, that's still wrong because of Pig, and possibly DDTW/Leave Me Praying.
74.140.252.72 06:31, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pre-album play 

message: Does anyone know how to fix that stray parentheses at the bottom of the infobox?  The "extra tracks" template is causing it to go below instead of being with the "Track (7)" info.  I don't know how to make both templates coexist with perfect formatting.  --Mtjaws (talk) 03:14, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox formatting
Talk:Brigade major

message: This article is incorrect when it describes the replacement of the Brigade Major. The British Army does not use the term G3 to describe a Chief of Staff, it uses the term G3 to describe a staff area, for example Staff Officer Grade 3 (SO3) G3 would be the Operations Captain. A Chief of Staff is not considered to sit within the G3 function, or any other staff function as they oversee all staff areas. They are  just referred to as the 'Chief of Staff' or COS for short. They oversee all staff areas (G1-9) for their commander with their Deputy Chief of Staff (DCOS) generally focusing on G1 and G4 (Personnel and Logistics). But each staff area would also have its own staff lead who would routinely report to the COS and DCOS who in turn would prioritise their work. These individuals would be referred to by their grade (SO3 - Capt, SO2 - Maj and SO1 - Lt Col) and staff area; G1 - G9. If no one objects i'll update the main article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.13.50.180 (talk) 10:59, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Inaccurate Description
Talk:Master commandant

message: The article notes that Stephen Decatur was promoted directly from Lieutenant to Captain, without ever serving as a Master Commandant.
While officers usually served first as a Lieutenant, and then Master Commandant, prior to promotion to Captain, but I don't believe he was the only USN officer to be honored by by this kind of promotion.
Some officers get promoted because they had excellent records, and their was a need for someone to be promoted.  Other officers got promoted for something exceptional, like an exceptional act of bravery, or leadership.  A really exceptional act might earn an officer a jump directly to Captain.
Historian C. Northcote Parkinson wrote a novel The Fireship, which describes the Battle of Camperdown, and its aftermath, where the First Lieutenant of every ship was promoted to Commander, except the First Lieutenant of the Flagship was promoted directly to Captain.  So, it was a Royal Navy practice, as well.  
My point?  If Decatur wasn't the only officer to be honored in this way, maybe the other officers should be mentioned, or the Decatur comment should be dropped...  Geo Swan (talk) 23:50, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Officers promoted straight from Lieutenant to Captain...
Talk:Jimi Thing

message: Why does an individual song have a track listing?  Is this supposed to be the songs on the CD-"single"?  We don't ordinarily mention the "B-sides" of singles unless they are particularly notable (i.e. moreso than the "A" side) Me Three (talk to me) 19:44, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Track listing?
Talk:Marshal of Yugoslavia

message: Marshal of Yugoslavia was not a rank, but a title.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.164.220.241 (talk) 13:22, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Field marshal (Thailand)

message: Historically, the coronation ceremonies were accompanied by instigation of rank, which was the case of Rama VIII "Ananda" and Rama IX "Bhumipol". In the case of King Rama X "Vajiralongkorn" however, he was seen very recently still wearing the General (Four-Star) rank insigna, and not the five-star rank. WikiNumbers (talk) 03:24, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, King Rama VIII never had a coronation, so part of your reasoning might not be accurate. --Paul_012 (talk) 11:34, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: True. But my main point here is that there is no notation at all that Rama X "Vajiralongkorn" has yet to receive the rank. WikiNumbers (talk) 11:17, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Auto-rank of Army Head
Talk:Primus pilus

message: does the last paragraph have to do with ANYTHING? "Althought lucius vorenus didnt agree with much of caeser's decision he went on accepting to become a senator of rome.However, he didnt see senate alot because caeser was assasinated quickly." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.116.18.95 (talk) 22:12, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What? 

message: As there is no biographical information in the article, why is this a biography task force article? Monstrelet (talk) 08:17, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biography? 

message: hello, just addressing these changes in the "Talk" page so you all knew what i added and why!
the things i have added are "off-duty life" and "role in war councils"
i added these things to help interest people more about the Primus pilus and the Legatus legionas so they could increase the size of these articles and learn  about their life while not a soldier and their life in the councils!
i will be fixing a few things pretty soon, such as the "First File" mistake that i have noticed!
Black-Wolf-the-poet (talk) 15:56, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  added a few things i knew of about high ranking Centurions 

message: Somehow "Primus Pilus" redirects to the article regarding "Centurion", even though apparently a separate article about this already exists with the same name.. So what is the problem?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Heruttaja (talk • contribs) 22:10, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  How to redirect to this article instead of to "Centurion"?
Talk:Gravedigger (song)

message: What about the lyric "Oh... 1940 to 1992..." 
There is no one attributed to these years like in the main verses. Does anyone know who the unnamed person he is referencing is, and why they were not named or described in detail like the other 3 characters in the song?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.48.116.135 (talk) 20:36, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Who

message: The song is listed as being 3:53 in the summary and 3:50 in the article. Does anyone know which it is?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.97.211.63 (talk) 20:03, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Song length