lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Garo (TV series)

message: Isn't the correct title for this show "Ougon Kishi GARO" (黄金騎士ガロ), meaning Golden Knight Garo??? I am going to edit this later. Here is proof, if anyone's questioning this: http://www.bandaigames.channel.or.jp/list/ps2_garo/ Kaixaken 22:53, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, correct it soon or I will stalk your nightmares D: 85.155.204.238 23:25, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Show Title 

message: I think some people would like to know about the show with the full details of the spoiles to save their time from watching. You might think "Well why watch it at all then!?", but people are busy and simply want to know a story than watching it. I read the movie spoilers to get the feel for a story myself. Why don't we just seperate the pages to reduce the size? 
Even with a spoiler tag, there are too much spoilers in this article. The article will be trimmed to fit Wikipedia's filesize limit. Kaixaken 23:45, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too Much Spoilers 

message: I always believed any small amount of info is helpful to anyone, perhaps we could simply move the materials in a seperate page to keep it at a certain page length. Eureka Seven and other anime pages gave out summarized versions and then had a seperate page for thicker detailed ones. How about that sort of format? 
Okay, this page is too long, according to the warning I get when I go to edit.  We need to cut some things, it seems.--Aresef 02:36, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, that warning is only a suggestion, the article doesn't have to be cut down or split up. However, there are many things that this article could do without, and several things it lacks. For instance, the "minor info" section doesn't seem very encyclopedic, could the significance of that be explained? In any case, this article needs more references.--Sean Black 02:47, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Yeah, there are so many things in there that were only mentioned/used once then never again. --Aresef 19:15, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Length 

message: The (Tv Series) page is already about the 2005 TV series and a new page for it isn't really necessary just because it has a lot of spinoffs and sequels etc. Maybe franchise pages would be better? Ppk80 (talk) 23:05, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes! That was my original intention. There should be a separate article dedicated to the franchise. I feel it's sloppy and unorganized to have the 2005 series page also cover the rest of the sequels and spin-offs. It's like having the rest of the James bond sequels, spin-offs, imitations, etc. be also covered in the Dr. No article, there's separate articles for things like that. The 2005 Garo article should mainly focus on the 2005 series and a separate article should be made for the the sequels and spin-offs, appropriately titled Garo (franchise), a la Godzilla (franchise). Armegon (talk) 23:31, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Is there any way we can trim it down, and merge this back into another article? Boomer VialHolla! We gonna ball! 09:02, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent bad page split
Category talk:Community building

message: I went ahead and took the liberty of starting :Category:Community in accordance with the Wikipedia:Be bold guideline. I feel that this action is responsible and logical. I placed :Category:Sociology on the new category page to make it a subcategory of sociology. In turn, I'm placing :Category:Community building under the new community category. See Wikipedia:Categorization for the guidelines I used.
All this is to facilitate the building and maintenance of Portal:Community (not to be confused with the Wikipedia:Community Portal) which is supposed (not imposed) to be a comprehensive reference section about community and community-related topics. 
As far as Community building within m:The Wikipedia Community goes, much has been done and said. The current Community Portal, Village pump and the Meta-Wikipedia are sufficient vehicles for Wikipedia internal processes. The Wikipedia:WikiProject_Community is an effort to at least pull community-related articles and topics into a centralized reference for the reading public through our new Portal. Please feel free to join the project and help build Portal:Community, edit articles, re-categorize things and join discussions as you see fit. See Community of practice.
If you have a passion and knack for building community as I do, please take a look at Wikipedia:Esperanza if you haven't already. Thanks for your participation. -- CQ 22:58, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Community
Talk:Još Hrvatska ni propala

message: Možemo stavit i pjesmu "Ciciban". Otprilike je jednako poetična i vrijedna. :) Jakiša Tomić 22:59, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Dr Gonzo, I must say I like Joy's original translation better. Maybe it wad tad less literal, but at least it had a rhythm. The original Croatian lyrics are difficult to parse anyway, so I don't think too literal translation is called for. Duja 00:56, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Translation

message: Is the anthem in any way related with the anthem of Poland Dąbrowski's Mazurka or is the similarity purely coincidental?
:No. "Hej Slaveni", anthem of former Yugoslavia sounds like anthem of Poland. This song has no connection with Polish anthem. What is similarity you are talking about? Jakiša Tomić 10:25, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I see now. I think that is coincidental. There is similarity only in first few lines. Jakiša Tomić 10:27, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I doubt it's coincidental—authors of the time apparently liked to copy each other :-). At least the leading verses were likely overwritten from Polish anthem (although I don't have sources to prove). Duja 11:20, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe you are right. If we compare him with Stanko Vraz, Gaj wasn't good poet at all. He was enthusiast and politician.  Jakiša Tomić 12:49, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Polish anthem
Talk:Yacyretá Dam

message: The correct spelling is Yacyretá (even though it is not correctly spelled by guaraní ortography rules). Should this article be renamed to correct this situation?
:Done :) . Bruno18 07:12, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling

message: Accordingly to this other source, it is only the 12th largest, not the second largest
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_the_largest_hydoelectric_power_stations  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.136.97.87 (talk) 01:39, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ranking 

message: "Numerous protected species have been affected in one the few spaces in which they survive in Argentina and Paraguay, including deer, pampas, capybara, herons, bogies and vacarés"
There are several possible issues with this sentence:
1. Are deer protected species in Argentian and Paraguay? Was this area really of the few spaces in which they survive?
2. 'Pampas' is a region and not an animal.
3. As for herons, the same question applies as in (1).
4. What is a "bogey"? The entry for Wikipedia refers to a wagon or a phantom. Perhaps this should be clarified. 
5. Also, there does not seem to be any creatures called vacarés, as far as I could tell, on a google search.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.70.67.5 (talk) 14:49, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  bogies and other animals 

message: Is any information about this organization available? I am not finding any, but this may just be me. Thanx.
RayKiddy (talk) 22:38, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Information on the Bi-National Entity?
Talk:Yılmaz Büyükerşen

message: == Photo ==
Would you please add a photo, if possible?
I added the photo myself
Aegeansun 23:19, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: Would you please add a photo, if possible?
I added the photo myself
Aegeansun 23:19, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo 
Talk:Sensitive compartmented information facility

message: I just typed in SCIF to discover that we already had this term here.  Just to point out, SCIF also stands for State Compensation Insurance Fund in California and Strategic Community Investment Fund on Prince Edward Island.  We need a disambiguiation page here, though I'm not experienced in creating this.  --Coolcaesar 23:11, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: We need a disambiguation

message: This article (or whoever wrote it) is unfortunately guilty of American (Tunnel) Vision/AmericEarth. SCIF is not unique to the US, it's not a US specific term or facility. Australia, New Zealand, UK and probably many other English speaking countries ALL have SCIFs.
It would be good if this article could be edited to reflect that SCIF is a generic termed used by most english speaking western countries, and not a US specific/ONLY term; and remove it from the "US PORTAL" come on guys. Basic research would show this.
Australia: https://www.aigroup.com.au/globalassets/working_securely_with_defence_guide-1.pdf
NZ: https://www.gcsb.govt.nz/assets/GCSB-NZISM/NZISM-v2.7-December2017-Part-One.pdf
UK: https://www.scif.co.uk/ KarmaKangaroo (talk) 15:18, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  SCIF Countries 

message: A non-biased image depicting a Skif should be used so as to not look as if trying to sway potential public opinion around skif's by using the current political climate around Mar-a-Lago as the only example imgae available. 2601:1C0:5501:3590:5431:203:828E:FAE3 (talk) 01:23, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image replacement 

message: The article claims that there was a SCIF at Mara-Lago but several news organizations have said in reports that there was not. Are the sources credible? The CNN article uses Trump's press secretary as the source which possibly not be credible. 2601:152:980:9BA0:198:EF4D:8A1D:3127 (talk) 13:51, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mobile/Temp SCIFs
Talk:Mary Rockefeller

message: I think this article should be deleted. Mary Rockefeller had no historical importance whatsoever other than married to a rich capitalist and politician. This is trivia. The fact that she was Nelson Rockefeller's first wife is mentioned in the wikipedia article about him and that is all anyone needs to know. Prb4 20:58, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion
Talk:Loser (Beck song)

message: In the music video section, it says:
"The moment where Beck is wearing a storm trooper mask is often censored for copyright reasons."
However, is there even any evidence of an uncensored version where he's wearing a "storm trooper mask" or should it say that it is always censored? Crazyeditor23 (talk) 18:02, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Music video clarification? 

message: Potentially include in the "Composition and Lyrics" section that "soy un perdedor" from the chorus is Spanish for "I'm a loser", which is the next line. MCPro1239954 (talk) 08:55, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Composition And Lyrics
Talk:The American Economic Review

message: I have deleted that obscure article by Friedman. I was unable to find it in EconLit. Furthermore, Friedman had no publication in AER in that year. --85.116.203.105 23:26, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: obscure article by Friedman

message: I'm not sure if Headbomb's latest revision was a good move.touché! Per the website, "The" is not italicized, which makes me wonder whether 'tis really a part of the title. --Eisfbnore • talk 17:25, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The" part of the title
Talk:Martingale representation theorem

message: Can someone provide a definition of the term "previsible"? In appears in a few other articles, seemingly without definition. Melcombe (talk) 15:06, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition required 

message: I propose to merge Integral representation theorem for classical Wiener space into Martingale representation theorem. It mostly just duplicates the material here, but something from the second section may be rescued. Hairer (talk) 15:25, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: There is a confusion what is Martingale representation theorem and what is Ito representation theorem. The article should state the former one and not the latter.
For didactic reasons, it would be good to have a section about the Ito repr theorem, since they are very much connected. The difference is not huge, but making the differences clear can help to better understand the theorem.
I think it is okay that the bulk of the article is about the continuous version, though, it could include jump processes too. Zsocca (talk) 23:30, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification of the topic
Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/TheKingOfDixie

message: I'm unfamiliar enough with the RfC process to not know where to put this summary, so putting it here ....
As should be apparent, this is not a dispute about the content of the article.  (I happen to share a certain revulsion for the subject matter.)
It is a dispute over the behavior of User:TheKingOfDixie.  They have ignored other's edits.  They refuse to consider discussion.  They are fixated on including this text.  They have indulged in attacks on other users, by imputation that all opposing them are "Metzger's followers".  
At the very best it can be said that they are ignorant of, and uninterested in, the behavioral norms of WP.  So, what to do?
Shenme 23:33, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Summarizing by [[User:Shenme]]
Talk:Pereiaslav Agreement

message: I think this should become a disambig for Treaty of Pereyaslav (1654) and Treaty of Pereyaslav (1659). Any comments?--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 23:34, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I object. --Ghirla -трёп- 08:40, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And why?--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 15:02, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

text: This is so evident that hardly needs discussing. --Ghirla -трёп- 07:11, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

text: This sounds like a good idea.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  07:27, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Depends on the context of those articles. We should read them and when needed, pipe those inks to appropriate disambiguated articles. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  17:08, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: dab

message: Britannica is only one tertiary source amidst a plethora of WP:RS. Before making WP:BOLD moves such as changing the article name to "Pereyaslav Agreement", discuss them. Google Scholar returns this for "Treaty of Pereyaslav", this for "Pereyaslav Treaty", and this for "Pereyaslav Agreement". I'd say that it's a hands down win for "Treaty of Pereyaslav", or at least some convolution with the use of "Treaty" as opposed to "Agreement". For the sake of consistency with the 'other' Treaty of Pereyaslav, a discussion needs to take place. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 00:34, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussing bold moves 

message: This article has been given the WP:POINTy treatment by one particular . Please note: WP:OR, pointy edit summaries like this to justify WP:POV changes to content are not appreciated... as are the edit summaries for trashy tags like this, this, and this added with no edit summary. Personally, I don't care if the editor doesn't understand the etymology of the word "Ruski" when ethnic groups who emerged from the old Rus' state continued to identify as the Rus' (not "Russians"), but his/her own ignorance of the history of these regions is not an excuse for WP:BATTLEGROUND trashing of article content. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 01:06, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: THe real point is that both you and User:Lute88 have been destroying the encyclopedic character of this article, as is obvious from your multiple reverts here. Just stop making statements that are not supported by RS, i.e. start complying with WP:V, to start off. Then read WP:NPOV, and start complying with it.Axxxion (talk) 13:05, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  I respectfully disagree. POV, and especially pointy ruPOV are a lot more harmful to wiki.--Lute88 (talk) 14:53, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pointy editing practices
Talk:John Martin (painter)

message: User Articulator1789 edited the article to state that the painting "Fallen Angels Entering Pandemonium" was formerly accredited to John Martin. All articles I can find still attribute it to him - can someone point to an article that supports Articulator's claim? BeastmasterGeneral 01:26, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Fallen Angels

message: I read somewhere that in the 1930's Martin's works were offered for sale, asking only for 74.94.150.197 (talk) 17:15, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Loss of Significance 

message: I'd suggest that Henry Warren could remain red-linked in the main image caption, as he is a likely candidate for an article. Martinevans123 (talk) 13:06, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Henry Warren  (1794–1879)
Talk:Bill

message: Bill O'Reiley should be included in this article.
and bill goldberg Sailor cuteness 17:09, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Guys, you should be bold and add these people yourself! --[[User:Elwood j blues|eluded already. Either way, next time be bold and add it yourself :) --elwood_j_blues (talk) 22:06, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

text: Well, some of us don't know HOW to add things. Daisy134 (talk) 17:26, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ommited People 

message: The page should not include people with the first name 'Bill', or it would become long and, realistically, useless to people looking for an entry. The personal name section should be confined to people whose last name is Bill, or who are known by no other name (such as the founder of Alcoholics Anonymous). hamiltonstone (talk) 23:46, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Bill as a first name

message: Should also be included in this article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.15.206.69 (talk) 02:25, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Bill as [[beak]]

message: should bill nye be added? technically, his first name is 'William,' so....   Daisy134 (talk) 17:26, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bill Nye
Talk:Abdulhakim Arvasi

message: Abdulhakim Arvasi is my grandfather. Although it is nice to see that my grandfather is included in Wikipedia, there are many things to be corrected what is written on my grandfather. I will do only couple couple of them for the time being. I hope correction will be made and informations, which will be given myself will be taken into account. 
1) some of pictures shown are not my grandfather`s pictures.
2) He passed away when he 86 years old. He had many students and followers. He never mentioned, even his son my father, Ahmet Mekki Ucisik never mentioned on anyone replacing him so that it is not correct to characterise anyone as his the best student. Thus neither Huseyin Hilmi Isik nor the others is the best student and replaced him. Especially when he was alive he said to many his followers that his post will not be given to anyone after he passes away.
3) His ancesstary goes to Prophet Mohammed. He was Ottoman and later on (as of 1923) Turkish Republic citizen. His family came to Anatolia from Bagdat after bagdat was damaged by Hulagu 700 years ago during Sultan Orhan Gazi, 2nd Ottoman Sultan. Orhangazi offered his family to rule of country, but that family preferred to enlight people.  
I will write more if corrections I made kind would be taken into account.
Dr. A. Hikmet UCISIK
Professor at Bogazici University
Istanbul  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ucisik (talk • contribs) 17:16, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: So? Good for him :) Baristarim 14:44, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: I quoted from the books of Hakikat Bookstore in Istanbul. In English versions of these books it is stated that whoever wants to copy and distribute books of Hakikat Bookstore is given the permission to do so. Suleyman Habeeb 00:00, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: So? Good for him :) Baristarim 14:44, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article
Talk:Spizzenergi

message: Created - this is a work in progress Ianguy 00:02, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Over two years on and this article is still a stub! I'm hoping to pay the article some attention in the next few days. I would very much appreciate any help with the editing. Yozzer66 (talk) 23:03, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The band was called Spizzenergi NOT Spizz Energi. And the band was called Spizz Oil before that and NOT The Spizzoils.  The history should be 
Spizz 77 (1977), 
Spizz Oil (1978),  
Spizzenergi (1979), 
Athletico Spizz 80 (1980), 
The Spizzles (1981-1982), 
Spizzenergi 2 (1982-1983),  
Spizzorwell (1983), 
Spizz performed as "The Last Big Future Show" in 1984, 
Spizz's Big Business (1985-1986), 
Spizzsexual (1986-1987), 
Spizzorbit (1988-1989), 
Spizzivision (1989-1990), 
the band then performed occasionly as Spizz Oil again in 1990-1993 with just Pete Petrol and Spizz in the band. 
In 1993 Spizz started using the name Spizzenergi again for his band, except for a xmas single released in 1994 under the name Spizzmas.
Gang of Four were pretty well established by 1979 when I saw them - to lump them with the Smiths that late on isn't really accurate at all, and conflates far too much...217.146.113.81 (talk) 20:23, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Spizz 77 is Spizz solo, "Spizzoil" is a duo (Spizz & Pete Petrol), the *band* this article should be about started with 'Spizzenergi' (1979), continued as 'Athletico Spizz 80' and 'The Spizzles' and ended with 'Spizzenergi 2' (-1983) - E-Kartoffel (talk) 18:35, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spizzenergi 

message: I am more than happy for the above person to go for it with the changes (don't forget to use 4 ~ (tilda's??) to sign your work Ianguy 10:56, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes
Talk:King Baggot

message: "the first "film stars" to be given billing, a marquis, and to be promoted in advertising."
I don't know much about the film industry, but isn't "marquis" supposed to be "marquee"? 24.118.231.159 (talk) 01:55, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling?