lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Embedded C++

message: I'm removing the part which said A criticism is that EC++ is intended for use with 32-bit architecture instead of focusing on the big market of 8/16-bit microcontrollers.. If you follow the link, you see that it's (a) the usual "oh, C++ code is too big and slow for my sysem!" critisism, (b) it actually hopes EC++ will fix that and (c) the text is from 1997 and it's not clear that it's relevant thirteen years later.
JöG (talk) 20:51, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  well, it's been almost another 3 years, I think we can remove that criticism now.  At least the 8/16 bit CPU market is no longer the "big market", even in embedded systems. With 32 bit CPUs now available in 48 pin packages, I don't think anybody is reasonably expecting to use C++ in any flavor if they're still using an 8-bit CPU. If that's removed, do we really need a criticism section at all? Nerfer (talk) 16:09, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing bad quotation 

message: Isn't it a sign of stability ? EC++ is stable since 2002, sounds good to me. agr 21 July 2010
:No, it's a sign that the website isn't maintained anymore. If this really still is the official website, then that is a pretty good indicator that Embedded C++ isn't maintained anymore. No news for eight years has nothing to do with stability. Has anyone checked whether some companies still support compilers for it? – Adrianwn (talk) 17:25, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment on EC++ website not updated since 2002 

message: Apple's I/O Kit appears to be the most significant project using EC++, and is currently maintained.  c.f I/O Kit Fundamentals: What Is the I/O Kit? "[I/O Kit] is based on an object-oriented programming model implemented in a restricted form of C++ that omits features unsuitable for use within a multithreaded kernel." --April Arcus (talk) 22:53, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  No mention of Apple's I/O Kit? 
Talk:Qawwal Bahauddin

message: Looks like most of this article was plagiarized from http://www.sufikalam.com/index.php?page=mypage&op=openPage&id=6&title=Ustad-Qawwal-Bahauddin.
When I have time, I'll try to do a complete rewrite (unless someone else can get to it first).  --Sarabseth (talk) 12:21, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagiarism
Talk:Minder

message: This disambiguation page is so that the various meanings of the word 'minder' can be given on its own page - instead of as a 'footnote' on the Minder television series article page (where the disambiguation section was originally given fo the word). Figaro 09:35, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

message: Most of the cited sources are not about this topic, but are primary sources using the word "minder", and from the uses in these sources the content of this article is synthesized.  --Lambiam 20:31, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original research 
Talk:Loki (C++)

message: I propose to merge Loki into Modern C++ Design. I think that the content in the Loki article can easily be explained in the context of Modern C++ Design, and the Modern C++ Design article is of a reasonable size that the merging of Loki will not cause any problems as far as article size is concerned. 74.101.43.105 (talk) 15:08, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:The Alvin Show

message: An IP editor has taken on the task of overlinking Ross Bagdasarian, Sr. and Ross Bagdasarian, Jr. and blurring the line between the two. Changing, for example "After Ross Bagdasarian, Sr.'s death, Ross Bagdasarian, Jr. took over" to "After Ross Bagdasarian's death, Ross Bagdasarian took over" results in the nonsensical "After Ross Bagdasarian's death, Ross Bagdasarian took over".
:
The IP editor has been making this change repeatedly across numerous Chipmunk articles and, of course, ignoring all of the reverts of the changes, attempts to contact them, etc.
:
I will be reverting the changes, escalating warnings as if the IPs are one editor, blocking as needed and requesting edit protection of the impacted articles. - SummerPhDv2.0 15:47, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disruptive overlinking
Talk:State Committee on the State of Emergency

message: If you tried to overthrow the US government, you would be either imprisoned lifelong or lose your life. Isn't it interesting that of these eight, 7 are living enjoyable lives after trying to "overthrow the government".
217.17.192.96 09:18, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: what is "enjoyable"? What is the fate of the GKChP members? Why did you classified them as Gang of Eight? Were they trialed? If not, they are innocent, aren't they not? Not caught - not guilty, right? Aleksandr Grigoryev (talk) 18:11, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Does the name of the prison these men were sent to need to be linked every time it appears?  Isn't once, or once per section, sufficient?
75.216.116.2 (talk) 02:36, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proper linking?
Talk:Off topic

message: Ive updated the page a bit and will probably do so a bit more in the next few days.
Added a bit more information regarding usage of the term "off topic," and some new external links. 
--Wump 09:22, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

message: Perhaps you can add an Off Topic link to the opposit of On Topic :) Anker99 01:51, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Off-Topic Link 

message: People don't write "on topic" posts, they write posts, which may be "off topic" or not. ie: on-topic is defined only as an opposite of off topic. Off topic posts are marked as OT, whilst On-topic posts are not marked. If there are no objections, I will convert it across in a week or so. --BP 10:41, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is back-to-front. 

message: I could not quickly come up with any references for the paragraph I added about OT ban policies.
Any experience list manager could could tell one this but a survey would need to be done 
(and probably has been) but I have not found it...  The article should / does cover both
on-topic and off topic.  I did not even notice that my seach to off-topic was redirected to 
on-topic.  Artcile naming policies may dictate... Fholson 16:26, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  OT ban policies 

message: Why is the title "Off topic" while the content text uses "off-topic" ?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.82.9.156 (talk) 06:47, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consistency 

message: Shouldn't this page be called off-topic if every mention of the term uses the hyphen?--Adûnâi (talk) 01:32, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move request to "Off-topic"
Talk:South Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee

message: South Memphis had an economic boom in the 1970s? Are you people just making stuff up? Also, the Arcade and Civil Rights Museum are in South Main, not South Memphis. These are two entirely different neighborhoods.
 
I am adding a Points of interest section, but for now am leaving everything else unchanged.
Moved content removed by User:Dralwik to the Downtown Memphis, Tennessee article.  This article needs expansion. BobJones 22:21, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:The Wailers Band

message: This is a valid article in its own right. Redirecting this article to Bob Marley disfavors the other members of this band. If you dislike this article, then you'll have to go through the AfD procedure to have it deleted or redirected. --Ezeu 09:30, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  redirecting to [[Bob Marley]] 

message: It's been suggested that these are really the same band operating with a slightly different name. If that is the case, they should probably be merged. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:24, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger 

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: accepted. – GorillaWarfare talk • contribs 03:11, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The band members of "The Wailers Band" got mixed with the members of "The Original Wailers" as both bands definitely DON'T have the same lead guitarist and Aston Barrett is still active member/frontman of The Wailers Band and not a past member, it appears as if someone has merged both musician-lists into one...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:42:2C29:9100:41E3:A85E:5CAA:4884 (talk) 21:59, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Page name
Talk:Fgets

message: Perhaps my mention of this function is controversial.  I guess it's less magic than mmap.  
http://mailman.oclug.org/pipermail/oclug-devel/2004-July/000054.html
My main point was to note the cumbersome nature of the fixed sized buffer.  The Gnu implementation of comm (Unix) contains this function. - MaxEnt (talk) 07:56, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: readlinebuffer()
Talk:Maggie MacDonald

message: If Elaine MacDonald isn't her mom (or I very slightly suppose an aunt) I will eat my shirt, but that's not a usable source and I can't presently get one... a Standard-Freeholder article mentioning Elaine following in Maggie's footsteps? Samaritan 09:36, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmmmm. Are you asking whether such an article exists or not, or stating that one does and asking if someone can provide a copy of it for reference purposes? I admit that this isn't quite definitive, but the recent NOW cover story on our Maggie does make ref to "her teacher/labour activist mother" (). Bearcat 07:19, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Whether, though it would be staggering if the Cornwall press hadn't even thought to mention their relation (or even hypothetical lack of one)... Samaritan 08:35, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Like daughter like...
Talk:Riparian forest

message: Shouldn't this article be combined with Riparian strip? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.48.140.145 (talk) 09:37, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge to riparian strip?

message: upon what authority does riparian refer to "non-flowing" bodies of water. i have only seen it used to denote the fringe of a flowing water body. Anlace 05:42, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: non flowing water bodies

message: I don't see the distinction between to be significant enough to separate out, at least in the condition of the article as is.Apothecia (talk) 00:14, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge to riparian zone

message: I like the article  but I wonder why the uppermost photo (Atlantic salt marsh) is attached here as it has nothing in common with a riparian forest. 
In my view the photo would be helpful in an article on salt marshes, e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salt_marsh Hana Cizkova 19:01, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Atlantic coastal salt marsh is not a riparian forest 

message: — Assignment last updated by BlueHorse2000 (talk) 18:38, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: ENGW3307 Adv Writing for the Sciences
Talk:Daggett, California

message: Added some information. I'm a relative of an employee at the SolarI facility, and eventually the plant may require its own article, at which point I will move all relevant info.  
Also accidentally checked the "minor edit" box. 
 --Wump 09:47, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:The Bootleg Beatles

message: I'm in the process of creating a timeline of the band, but does anyone know when the changeover between Rick Rock and Hugo Degenhardt (Ringo) happened?
Booglamay 19:04, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ...sorted! Booglamay 00:51, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lineups 
Talk:Ushi-oni

message: I understand that those of us with no first-hand exposure to Japan outside anime and mangas will think that listing monsters that vaguely resemble Ushi-oni is somehow important. It isn't. First, nothing in Mod Ref is referenced, which means it shouldn't be there to begin with. Secondly, it embarrassing to the rest of us since it gives undue weight to things that are the definition of trivia. Once you break open an actual book (hint, hint) and do some frikkin' research that would stand up to academic inquiry (and if you're not old enough to know what academic research requires ... how sad and cute!), in other words take Japanese mythology seriously, then whatever you come up with should and will go into this article. Anything else needs to be drop kicked and deleted.Duende-Poetry (talk) 20:20, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Nuking the Mod Ref Section From Orbit (it's the only way to be sure)
Talk:Dreros

message: *Information had been lost in re-writing the opening statement, which I have recast. Dreros passes without mention until the ninth-century Byzantine grammarian Theognostus De orthographia. If an earlier mention of Dreros is located, that should be a noteworthy addition.--Wetman (talk) 16:12, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Council of Nablus

message: Is it possible to link to the full text?  I don't know if the Vatican or others have digitized it... anyone interested in looking into it?  Jouster 13:31, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I couldn't find it online...well, actually, the full text is in that Speculum article, but not everybody will be able to access that. Should we link to it anyway? Adam Bishop 16:15, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No link to the full text, but I've now summarized the canons more fully. They are pretty short so sometimes it feels like I might as well have just translated them directly...but I don't think this is the appropriate place to do that, so I hope this is a good compromise. Adam Bishop 04:07, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Full Text 

message: Is the Pagan who signed this document as chancellor the same as the Pagan who was butler? Srnec 06:35, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops, I meant to answer this like four years ago...no, they're not the same guy. Adam Bishop (talk) 09:18, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Pagan
Talk:In the Woods...

message: In Encyclopaedia Metallum, the Demos (first two) are shown the other way round: Name 	Type 	Year 	Reviews
Isle of Men 	Demo 	1993 	 
Rehearsal / Demo 02.93 	Demo 	1993 	 
HEart of the Ages 	Full-length 	1995 	8 (89%)
…
Lincoln J. (talk) 09:46, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discography 

message: Real psychedelic black metal would be like Orassi Pazuzu and they sound nothing like them. Please call them "Atmospheric black metal", "progressive rock" "avant-garde metal", etc. But calling them Psychedelic black metal is 100% incorrect  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.62.251.17 (talk) 18:11, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The article currently has only one reference, which refers to the band as being in this genre both in the headline and in the article. If you can find reliable sources which demonstrate that this is incorrect, please feel free to bring them here for debate. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 13:17, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  This band is NOT psychedelic black metal.
Talk:Patrick Harper (fiction)

message: In the "Character" section, we currently say
:These are also the reason that he has been risen from rifleman to sergeant and then sergeant-major.
Um, what does "these" refer to?
Also, the wording seems wrong. Should we use "has been raised" instead of "has been risen"?
:These are also the reason that he had been raised from rifleman to sergeant and then sergeant-major.
Similarily, in a preceding sentence, we should probably have "gave" instead of "had given":
:... seven-barrelled Nock gun that Sharpe gave him as a present
Cheers, CWC(talk) 00:56, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification requested
Talk:Anti-Americanism/Archive 20

message: I have reverted to the original lead paragraph on this because I felt the changes were opening the door to everything we wanted to not have off the top: POV statements, semantic points which invite a qualifier etc.
"Consistent hostility" is not perfect but I'll stand by the initial change. If you can't say it in two or three sentences don't say it. Save it for use of the term. Marskell 23:19, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: When I revert I always make a talk comment as I did below. This is not disrespectful. Marskell 12:50, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead 

message: "Anti-American sentiment" redirects here. That seems wrong to me. The article as it is currently framed is about unreasonable or excessive hatred of the United States government or society. Anti-American sentiment is something that can be quite reasonable.
I'm new to this area of Wikipedia, is there an article that details the various criticisms of U.S. hegemony, culture and government policy?
Ben Arnold 04:31, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anti-American sentiment 

message: The fact that theres a recent study that shows that there are more obese people in Finland and Denmark doesnt mean that people form the US wont be stereotyped as "fat" from now on; thus, the description of the article (while most likely of some use someplace else) doesnt fit where it was placed, and I have removed it. 12:14, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Obesity 

message: The "History" section of the article contains various instances of anti-Americanism, some of which spring from prejudice but many of which are plain criticism of contemporary American politics. Samuel Johnson's charge of hypocrisy, for example, is properly a judgment rather than a prejudice. With that in mind I have changed "Prejudice against the United States (and at times the North American continent) has persisted since the country's original settlement, with criticisms varying greatly in content and motive," to "Strong feeling against...". I think the last part of that sentence already captures the variety of motivations, bona fide or not, for anti-American sentiment. Oliverkroll 20:58, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism / Strong feeling 

message: In archiving I noticed a post from a while ago that I hadn't responded to at the time regarding our first pic. Given that it's presumably two Americans protesting a specific issue rather than a non-American caricaturing the country as such, is it actually a good choice? The North Korean and Catalan pics are cluttered together. Maybe drop the Vietnam pic and move one of those up? Marskell 15:21, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. The Vietnam picture is too frequently read as a POV implication. Tfine80 22:43, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pic
Talk:Commercial broadcasting

message: The article states that "public broadcasting where programming is largely funded by government or public donations is more common elsewhere [i.e. outside of the Americas]." While public broadcasting is indeed more common there, commercial broadcasting has achieved at least parity with public broadcasting in most of the world. This article, on the other hand, implies that commercial broadcasting is dominant only in the Americas. While that was the case at one time, it is no longer true. Most countries have so-called dual broadcasting systems, with commercial and public broadcasting existing side by side, but even in Europe, if one were to add up the audience statistics of commercial vs. public radio and television services, the results would, in many cases, show that public broadcasting is no longer the dominant form of broadcasting, at least according to that definition.
Yes, the Americas are different because they have always been dominated by commercial broadcasting (public broadcasting has traditionally had a marginal role there), but we cannot really imply that commercial broadcasting isn't a major force elsewhere. The 1990s, after all, were a decade that drastically changed the international broadcasting landscape.
I open this up for a discussion. If there are no responses, I will take that as permission to make the changes myself.
WorldWide Update 19:42, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Furthermore, the nuetraility of the article is beyond dispute; The tone of the overall article continuously harps on the "public vs private" issue to leave the impression there is something "wrong" with priavte broadcating. It's political granstanding, nothing else.65.100.56.249 (talk) 21:28, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Public vs. Commercial Broadcasting 

message: I moved the sentence below here from the lead, since I couldn't copyedit it without adding weasel words.
:"Today, it is considered the dominant global model of television and radio."--Miniapolis (talk) 01:58, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsubstantiated material 

message: This channel is public-owned, from RTVC.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.66.14.194 (talk) 21:43, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  EXCLUSION FOR CH. 1 (COLOMBIA)
Talk:Parking enforcement officer

message: I would like to see something in this article about so called "Parking Nazis" which are parking officers on college campuses throughout the United States. According to a search I did on Yahoo, the term is very common. I know at the University of Utah, Parking nazi is the common term given to the officers. Milonica 22:11, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I beg to differ: calling someone a "Nazi" in reference to a perceived zealousness in enforcing rules and regulations, is indeed derogatory. I would question that calling a "parking enforcement officer" a "meter maid" is derogatory.Wschart (talk) 19:57, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Parking Nazis

message: Is there an articel on people who read power/gas/water meters? I haven't been able to find it, but it should have a disambig link on this page. 76.117.247.55 (talk) 02:46, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about the other kind of "meter reader" 

message: This article should not be merged as neither "traffic warden" nor "parking enforcement officers" have a consistent international meaning. At the least, both articles require clear separation and identification of nation-specific content.--MBRZ48 (talk) 01:52, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger with Parking Enforcement Officer 

message: When did traffic wardens arrive? Certainly not with the Road Traffic Act 1988, the plage was well established by 1988.  I  remember the scum in or about 1970. Froggo Zijgeb (talk) 20:35, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advent of traffic wardens in the UK 

message: Placement of critical negative material in the lead re. "nazis", stab proof vests, target-driven fining approaches etc. is NPOV and gives undue weight to a partisan (eg. selfish car-owning) view of these workers.  Will change the article and move it to a subsection accordingly.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.144.47.95 (talk) 21:00, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Critical negative material in the lead 

message: There's no mention of the word "Windscreen" or "Windshield Wipers" in an article on Parking Enforcement Officials?  Maybe a more specific job description should be provided.70.81.138.34 (talk) 04:31, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can't find the word "WINDSHIELD" in the article.
Talk:RAF Polebrook

message: Looking good! Isopropyl 11:24, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

message: Polebrook and grafton underwood articles both contain the information that 'they both' were host to the aircraft that flew the first missions during WW2. I beleive it was grafton- can someone with a source clarify and amend them?----  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.153.241.122 (talk) 18:35, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  duplication of information? 

message: The following coordinate fixes are needed for
Current location for RAF Polebrook is almost 2 kilometers off west from the centre of the former base.  By searching around Google Earth I have located Hangers J and T2 (identified in RAF Polebrook Wikipedia image) still errect at the following coordinates:
52°28'08.08"N 0°23'29.13"W.  Based on the aerial image provided in the wiki article Hanger J is pretty much in the centre of the base and tag should therefore be ajusted for it.
—99.246.99.59 (talk) 18:42, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error 