lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Oilbird

message: It would be great to have a good picture of one of these birds, or one of the mass of them flying out of a cave at dusk.
:I agree. Unfortunately, the Trinidad site no longer allows flash photography, and the pics I took by torchlight were too poor to use. jimfbleak 08:11, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: managed to find one on Flickr! Sabine's Sunbird  talk 03:06, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: 138.238.41.70 had added some wording extolling the Asa Wright center as a world-renowned birdwatcher's haven. It seemed more like free advertising than relevant information to me, especially given that the center has its own page, so I reverted to something more like the original. (I left the change from "on" the center to "at" the center.)
--Lavintzin 22:20, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Asa Wright center 

message: I seem to remember (from when I assisted Dr. Snow while he was studying these fascinating birds in the 1950s) that the squabs had little hooks on the elbow joints of their wings by which they could cling to the rock walls of the caves. Can anyone confirm this, please, or, even better, provide some reference for it? Many thanks, John Hill 23:10, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hooks on wings of squabs? 

message: Rictal bristles should link to the paragraph about them in the Beak article. Only the word Rictal was linked, and it was to the dictionary definitions/disambiguation page of Rictal which had nothing to do with the Rictal bristles bird whiskers. 207.112.55.242 (talk) 13:58, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rictal bristles needs a link
Talk:Emona

message: Emona is mentioned in Koskova's "The Historian." Does this city still exist? What is it named today.
I came for the same reason. If I find out, I'll come post it.
: It's Ljubljana. But there is no mentioning of the city in the article about the book, you can fix that. --Tone 00:16, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:James Butler, 1st Duke of Ormond

message: 11th Bersaglieri Regiment. Either a mistake or tampering. vancouveriensis Vancouveriensis (talk) 04:53, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unit?

message: Could someone expert put this Irish Royal Army in the infobox? In 1641-43 there was also the "English Army for Ireland", that was a part of the then Irish Royal Army, all under Ormond's control.78.17.37.62 (talk) 21:32, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Irish Royal Army 

message: Can someone please clarify the sentence which states that 'Ormonde proclaimed Charles II'? Does it mean that Ormonde proclaimed his loyalty to Charles II? The meaning of the verb is unclear (to me). Buckyboot (talk) 11:00, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Commander of Royalist Alliance
Talk:Rice-A-Roni

message: It's false, this should be deleted.
I disagree. Rice-A-Roni is clearly a tasty and valuable option. Whoever says otherwise is a satanist.
It's not bad, and a lot better when you add some meat and fresh vegetables. It's good to have when there isn't time to cook from scratch.Saxophobia (talk) 13:13, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  False 

message: I'll give it a couple of weeks for consensus, but so far the two choices for main image are :Image:Rice-A-Roni.jpg and :Image:Ricearoni.jpg, neither of which are spectacular images, but which is less awful? Sherurcij (Speaker for the Dead)  05:57, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: First off, last I checked, many San Francisco cable cars still bear a Rice-A-Roni ad, including the Rice-a-Roni sponsored car from the rebuilding of the system in the 1980's.  Also, on the back of every box (as of this writing in 2006), it bears a indicium of a cable car with the text "The San Francisco Treat".  The lines about them dropping the tagline are at minimum need citation, and at maximum completely inaccurate based on simple observation.
From article: "In 1895, Italian-born immigrant, Domenico DeDomenico (1915-2007).[1] , moved to California"... please correct this.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.237.106.177 (talk) 04:55, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Inaccuracies in article

message: Should be mentioned that it was heavily promoted on 1970s TV game shows... AnonMoos 22:31, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Game shows

message: yum 64.229.208.75 (talk) 01:47, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  i love it. 

message: man i want some rice-a-roni 
2601:5C7:8101:7DA0:95FB:3C54:8E1B:5946 (talk) 19:20, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  its so good
Talk:Tony Award for Best Play

message: While it is certainly useful to have a list like this,  the article is sadly lacking in any other information, which is why I have added the 'context' cleanup tag to it. 
In particular it needs:
* Indication of where it relates to. I'm pretty sure it relates to Broadway, but I have no idea how wide the scope actually is. The article at present doesn't even say it's USA!
* Indication of who awards it, how and when.
* Explanation of the list: I guess that the listings from 1956 on indicate the winner and the other nominees, but nothing says so (and the comment at the top of this page is confusing). ColinFine 21:06, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup
Talk:Cutco

message: Copied reference from Case Cutlery to Cutco See former article's history for a list of contributors.  7&6=thirteen (☎) 18:57, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Attribution

message: See Talk:Vector Marketing#The Forever Guarantee 7&6=thirteen (☎) 15:27, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Related discussion
Wikipedia talk:Userboxes/Music/Proficiency/Adding

message: I wholeheartedly agree. You're right; this should be modelled after the language templates and the formatting should match exactly. Keep up the good work. I might be of some assistance, too. Krun 20:33, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Good idea

message: Bah, go right ahead. Not entirely sure I like the abbreviation for "piano", but I don't know what else could be used. Hermione1980 23:11, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Looks good!

message: I don't really care. ♥purplefeltangel 02:07, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your suggestion. I added some clarification as a final section above. The problem is that the User instruments categories don't have the naming consistency that the User languages ones do. For instance, :Category:User piano has 'pno' in the tag (thanks to Krun), and :Category:User organ has 'org' in the tag and as the code for the template (thanks to me). As I said above, pay attention to the name in the template if you want to use it. Ddawson 03:47, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Yeah, whatever

message: I like standarization and templates.  Trysha 05:07, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Good with me

message: Well, I don't see any opposition to this after several days. Plus, Krun went ahead and converted some templates himself. (Thanks for the help.) So I guess it's accepted. I'm still open to comment here, though. Ddawson 06:46, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Looks like it's a go

message: When I first saw the bass user templates, there was the basic bass one and the bass novice one... there always seemed like there should be more but I didn't want to interfere with someone else's project or anything. Thumbs up from me. mxdxcxnx T C 17:55, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: I thought it was supposed to be that way

message: ==Shirkers==
Different subject, but along similar lines: how about templates with which Wikipedians could categorize themselves based upon how much of the time they are supposed to be working is instead put toward Wikipedia editing? I created an example using :
:
This creates:
:
P.S. to DDawson: Sorry, I didn't notice you had closed the discussion before I posted this on your Talk subpage.
-- Gyrofrog  (talk) 21:45, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Other comments

message: Different subject, but along similar lines: how about templates with which Wikipedians could categorize themselves based upon how much of the time they are supposed to be working is instead put toward Wikipedia editing? I created an example using :
:
This creates:
:
P.S. to DDawson: Sorry, I didn't notice you had closed the discussion before I posted this on your Talk subpage.
-- Gyrofrog  (talk) 21:45, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Shirkers
Talk:James Allen (journalist)

message: I think this page name will have to be changed soon, despite James being a talented and immensely popular commentator. --92.21.252.10 (talk) 17:06, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ignoring the previous comment, it would be sensible to think of a new (encyclopedic) title. Any suggestions? Mark83 (talk) 22:31, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Possibilities include James Allen (Formula One) and James Allen (motorsport), although Wikipedia:Naming conventions (people) says "It is generally preferred to use a noun that describes the person, rather than an activity, genre, or affiliation (chemist, not chemistry)." Given that he's written three books as well as being a commentator, I guess James Allen (journalist) would also be appropriate. I think any of those three would distinguish him from the other James Allens. DH85868993 (talk) 12:03, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think James Allen (journalist) is an excellent suggestion. Mark83 (talk) 15:46, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  James Allen (Formula One Commentator) 

message: I see that James Allen's performance on Celebrity Mastermind is under the headings of Career/BBC
Is it justified to have this as part of his 'career'? I think it will be more suited in any other section. Khairul Islam 13:52, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Celebrity Mastermind 
Talk:Sita

message: 2407:5200:300:37AC:1D0B:4B2D:E69:CC06 (talk) 07:40, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. NotAGenious (talk) 08:43, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 17 July 2023
Talk:Gigue

message: This article isn't quite consistent with the articles on metre (music) and compound metre. As I understand it and as these articles say, 3/8 is a simple triple time, not a compound time. Andrewa 02:48, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: September 2005

message: I have never seen a gigue in 3/8 in my life, changed to 9/8 as it is much more appropriate for the period in which gigues would have been most common (baroque). Also changed from 6/4 to 6/8 which is the correct time signature —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 213.249.155.239 (talk • contribs) .
(Bach wrote several gigues in 3/8 -- see his 2nd, 3rd, and 5th Cello Suites, for example.) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 143.44.71.212 (talk • contribs) .
See also French Suites #2 and #3 (BWV 813 & 814) for gigues in 3/8. JeanneShade (talk) 00:03, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Time signatures 

message: The article for "Jig" says "The term jig was probably derived from the French 'giguer', meaning 'to jump' or giga, the Italian." and provides a reference: "J. Ling, L. Schenck, R. Schenck, A History of European Folk Music (Boydell & Brewer, 1997), p. 194."  This sounds much more likely than the 12th-century violin origin identified here.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by BryanFrazar (talk • contribs) 03:13, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The article on the giga -- as well as other sources -- suggests that the name of the dance and of the instrument are cognate. The German word Geige ("fiddle") is, incidentally, another cognate. -- Picapica (talk) 23:51, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology 

message: I removed this line today: "Composers known to have famously used the gigue include Christopher Jung and Noah Jung." 
Try a google search for either of these individuals. The only thing that comes up is this article. Safe to say this is nothing but spam.
174.109.220.146 (talk) 16:28, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spam removed 

message: What is the common tempo range for the tempo of a gigue? Shrillpicc100 (talk) 19:27, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Tempo?

message: Should there be a disambiguation or something about the character Giegue (aka Giygas) from the video game EarthBound?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.117.180.107 (talk) 19:52, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Earthbound/MOTHER 

message: The simple music examples are great but they could easily have an accompanying audio file for those incapable of reading music, even if simply rhythmic. ~ JasonCarswell (talk) 01:30, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Audio File?
Talk:Latin for All Occasions

message: Cave, vomitorus sum!
:That should be vomiturus, right? (I don't have the book.)
::Yes.--Jondel (talk) 23:34, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

message: Homo pulcher, a beautiful man. Good grief, what is the Latin word for handsome??? Uxor mea, Raquel (Rachel), femina pulchra mexicana est. Note: capitalizing mexicana is an anglo (English language) convention to which, as a native Dutch speaker, do not subscribe in any language other than English. The adjective mexicana is not capitalized in Spanish either. Peter Horn 00:55, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The author of this book obviously used a web translator or a shitty dictionary. Thanks to this book, I now have scrotal cancer. 76.95.40.6 (talk) 12:29, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Latin for All Occasions#Latin for All Occasions]]
Talk:Transcendence (philosophy)

message: The article is mainly about transcendence in philosophy.  An anonymous user has added a spirituality template which focuses primarily on spiritual meanings of transcendence that aren't related to this article.  It seems to me that perhaps there is a need for an article about transcendence in spirituality, to which this box is more appropriate.  Meanwhile, I'm reverting the article.  Perhaps the anonymous user would care to discuss on this page the justification for the spirituality box.  Jeremy J. Shapiro 03:21, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Spirituality box

message: I propose that we merge Transcendental philosophy into this article. Having both is confusing for readers, there's two different explanations of the same topic. CircleAdrian (talk) 03:01, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal

message: Currently, the opening sentence says:
‘In philosophy, transcendence conveys that the basic ground concept from the word's literal meaning (from Latin), of climbing or going beyond, albeit with varying connotations in its different historical and cultural stages.‘
But it is incomplete and it isn’t clear what should have followed so I cannot correct it. Can the author help out? Thanks. 
Tumblingsky (talk) 14:58, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening sentence appears to be ungrammatical.
Talk:Dicksonia antarctica

message: —Preceding unsigned comment added by 157.128.218.206 (talk • contribs) 
I don't know why this page is titled the Tasmanian Tree Fern.  Soft-tree fern is more commonly used. |
:The two terms seem to be used equally. I have moved the page to its scientific name for this reason. SCHZMO ✍ 23:42, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: earlier comments

message: Would it not be more appropriate to have a photograph of a large specimen in its natural habitat, rather that a rather small, sad looking one it a pot in someone's backyard? Glennnnn 01:36, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Definitely. Next time I get to Tasmania I'll take care of it. Only I don't think I'll get to Tasmania (at least not anytime soon). We need to find some Australian Wikipeidans who get down that way to get us a pic. --DanielCD 01:43, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. There was already a good pic at the commons. SCHZMO ✍ 23:29, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photograph 

message: This species name has been moved in the relevant plant catalgues to Balantium antarctica following a publication of 2012, as stated in "The Plant List" and the new LCVP (Leipzi catalogue of vascular plants).
See http://legacy.tropicos.org/NamePage.aspx?nameid=50183033
and http://www.theplantlist.org/tpl1.1/record/tro-50183030
The LCVP appears to be available as a download from Github only, for the time being.
Should this page be renamed and Dicksonia antarctica relay to it instead?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:908:695:36A0:3D4B:5AB3:6336:1A48 (talk) 00:23, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renaming
Talk:Gang Dong-won

message: Hello. Gang Dong Won's official English name is Gang Dong Won, not Kang Dong Won.
Please check YG's official page (http://ygstage.com/yg-profile/about?star=gang-dong-won). Also, please watch out for users who might want to change his name back to "Kang Dong Won".
Thanks! Yelkie — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yelkie (talk • contribs) 23:49, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official English Name is Gang Dong Won
Talk:East Asian age reckoning

message: The main image for this article contrasts "Korean age" with "Real age". Even though it's used by most of the world, it's still not ideal to suggest one culture's counting system is more "real" than another. Are there any alternate terms that might be more neutral? I'd ping the image creator, but it appears they're no longer active. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 15:57, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: This caught my eye as well. I would suggest "chronological age" as more neutral alternative. PerplexedPigeon (talk) 16:48, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Aljazeera uses "international system" and "western way". TIME uses "international standards" and "calendar age". BBC also uses "international standards". International standards and calendar age seem like useful and more neutral terms, depending on context. CMD (talk) 02:07, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: International age or calendar age are both much preferable to "real age". :3 F4U (they/it) 00:13, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

text: I've gone ahead and changed the graphic to say "International Age." The closest font I could find that matched was Bitstream Vera Serif Bold, if someone else decides to change it in the future. Mshron (talk) 14:25, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Real age"
Talk:Eureka Seven

message: terminology heavily influences in-universe style for this article and the setting section is not well summarized. Also some of the terminology can fit in the setting section. after that i highly suggest we remove the terminology section for the risk of keeping original research and in-universe style article.  
Also mecha is not the official genre given to and isn't even a genre, so that must be removed. 
another section that needs work is the video game section and the manga and novels section. those two areas definitely need some refs. 
i'll preserve this area but if it stays the same, then i will be removing all original research that appears to be fan added.Bread Ninja (talk) 16:40, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Setting and Terminology 

message: Eureka 7 V.1:New Wave has been afd for deletion.
Nominated for deletion; see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eureka 7 V.1: New Wave. Bread Ninja (talk) 16:56, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion 

message: *ActiveAnime: Movie DVD
*Mania.com: Movie DVD
--KrebMarkt (talk) 20:29, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review(s) 

message: Please visit the Animanga talk page to discuss. —KirtMessage 17:55, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Eureka Seven: AO]]
Talk:Derek Croxton

message: Hi. As the creator of this article, I am willing to suggest a different wording for the initial paragraph since after all it is not worth deleting the article into oblivion because of that. I apologize and admit to plagiarism.
Suggested New opening:
Derek Croxton, PhD, is an American academic specialized in History. He authored of several articles on military and diplomatic aspects of the Thirty Years' War. Croxton wrote Peacemaking in Early Modern Europe: Cardinal Mazarin and The Congress of Westphalia, 1643-1648. Doidimais Brasil 01:35, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright

message: In September 2005, this article was nominated for deletion. The result was to keep. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Derek Croxton for a record of the discussion. — Trilobite 03:56, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Articles for deletion
Talk:Anuschka Tischer

message: In September 2005, this article was nominated for deletion. The result was to keep. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anuschka Tischer for a record of the discussion. — Trilobite 03:56, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Anuschka Tischer is not and never was a professor, see her curriculum vitae. In nine years since her PhD she published only one scientific article and didn't achieve any academic promotion, especially not to a professor. Her article in the German Wikipedia was deleted after discussion because of lack of significance. --87.234.145.160 12:30, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Sorry, creating the article's deletion discussion page somehow doesn't work, although I proceed according to the guide. Could someone please complete the step? Reasons are above. --87.234.145.160 12:38, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Anuschka Tischer is relevant until you find someone else that understand half as much as her about the most cited international treaty in History. Doidimais Brasil 00:37, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Articles for deletion
Talk:Ukrainian language/Archive 1

message: If there's no objection, I'll remove the NPOV notice from this article.  —Michael Z. 17:49, 2005 Jan 14 (UTC)
: Never mind.  —Michael Z. 16:27, 2005 Jan 16 (UTC)
This talk page has not been edited since January 16 and the last major edit to the article is also from that date so there seems to be little interest in fixing the perceived lack of NPOV with the article, perhaps it is time to remove the NPOV notice now? I don't think it was intended to be permanently embedded in any article. --Biekko 21:02, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV notice 

message: Phrase removed:
:"Modern term for the country, Ukraine, is derived from the Russian word for border area, which had been used originally to denote "ukraines" in Karelia, Ural, and elsewhere."
First, it must be discussed in a single place, to avoid divergence, namely, in the Ukraine article. Second, I've never heard of "Karelia" called "Ukraina". I also never seen the usage in the plural form, kind of  "ukrainy Rossii" or something like that. mikka (t) 21:25, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Ukraine" 

message: Michael, thanks for your copyediting. Others, please help bring this to FAC. With grammar section rewritten, it should be ready. Now, re the poster. I think it is more than recruitment poster. It is also a Ukrainization poster. Mikkalai explained it well at Talk:Ukrainization#The_poster. So, should we make the caption say both? --Irpen 02:46, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Poster of [[1921]]