Talk:Great French Wine Blight

message: The article states:
* "Over 40% of French grape vines and vineyards were devastated over a 15 year period, from the late 1850s to the mid 1870s." 
* "Production of wine in France fell from 84.5 million hectolitres in 1875 to only 23.4 million hectolitres."
I assume that the last statement should be "Production of wine in France fell from 84.5 million hectolitres to only 23.4 million hectolitres in 1875." to make more sense, but I'm not sure, also the 40% and 84.5 to 23.4 sounds a bit wrong, but might be correct with a from and to year, also a ref would be nice.  --Stefan talk 14:09, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phylloxera says "total wine production fell from 84.5 million hectolitres in 1875 to only 23.4 million hectolitres in 1889!" --194.174.73.33 (talk) 14:37, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistancy? 

message: I have reviewed this article according to the requirements of the GA criteria and have placed the article on hold at this time until the following issues are addressed:
#""Reconstitution" (as it was termed) of the many vineyards that had been lost was a slow process, but eventually the wine industry in France was able to return to relative normality." Single sentences shouldn't stand alone, either expand on this or incorporate it into another paragraph. Fix all other occurrences within the article.
#:Well, I fixed that instance.  (that one, at least)
#"The only description of the disease that was given by these wine growers was that it 'reminded them distressingly of "consumption"'." Add an inline citation for where this quote is from.
#: -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 06:42, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GAN review: On hold

message: Since the above issues were addressed, I have passed this article as a good article according to the requirements of the GA criteria. Continue to improve the article, making sure that all new information is properly sourced. Also, to anyone that is reading this review, please consider reviewing an article or two at WP:GAN to help with the large backlog. Instructions can be found here. Keep up the good work, and I hope that you continue to bring articles up to Good Article status. If you have any further questions about this review, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks Nehrams. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 06:26, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA passed

message: This article talk page was automatically added with  banner as it falls under :Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 06:24, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:FOOD|WikiProject Food and drink]] Tagging

message: Substituted at 16:40, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Great French Wine Blight. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110717235415/http://www.wampumkeeper.com/wineblight.html to http://www.wampumkeeper.com/wineblight.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:54, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This bit from the article (as of November 2018) doesn't make sense biologically:
: it is largely considered to have been a species of Daktulosphaira vitifoliae
Daktulosphaira vitifoliae is a species. You can say either "considered to have been a species of Daktulosphaira" or "considered to have been Daktulosphaira vitifoliae", depending on just how exact the suspicions about the culprit are. But as is, it doesn't make sense. --Saforrest (talk) 09:06, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Species identification 

message: Someone told me that this blight not partially destroyed vineyards but destroyed the total wine culture in Europe?
145.129.136.48 (talk) 11:24, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Great French Wine Blight