lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Crappie

message: One of the pictures in the article is captioned "a 'black-nosed' crappie". It would be helpful to know whether this is a third species, a subspecies, or simply a local Arkansas term for one of the species described. If the former, perhaps it might merit a section of its own. If the latter, perhaps the caption might be changed. --Haruo (talk) 04:56, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  species/varieties 

message: The notability is there for two articles, and plenty of reliable sources.  However, since this article does not yet have sufficient sourced material for two articles, I will remove the tag.Fishgeek (talk) 23:16, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Splitting Black Crappie and White Crappie

message: Where in the world can you find this fish? In the article it says that you can find it "in all of the lower 48 states", and I thought of the southernmost countries of Southern America, Africa and Oceania. It wasn't until I clicked the link that I found out that it meant "the lower 48 states of the United States of America". Therefore it should be stated whether or not one can find this fish outside the USA, and not only where in the USA one can find it.
So don't forget to write the articles from a general perspectve and not from an USAnian perspective.--90.177.152.103 (talk) 13:07, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distribution
Talk:1934 British Empire Games

message: People who know the subject, please vet the changes by known vandal 210.54.65.251.  -- Antaeus Feldspar 04:49, 3 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: See Talk:All-time medal tally of Commonwealth Games for discussion on this and other related merges. Kevin 04:52, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge 

message: There were 17 nations, so with 15 flags the page is two short - Hong Kong and ?? Will try to work it out! Hugo999 (talk) 06:53, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  All Teams 

message: "ss this was a breakthrough for women in sport that would one day lead to full recognition and programming for women's athletics on the international stage." -- Women's athletics had been at the 1928 Olympics and the 1932 Olympics. In 1932, GB, Canada and S Africa sent women; Canada had done so in 1928. jnestorius(talk) 14:35, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Well the text was a WP:COPYVIO of the CGF site, so I've expunged it. jnestorius(talk) 14:56, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious 

message: The lede says 17 but the list gives 16. Also, at Talk:Ireland at the British Empire Games#Irish Free State in 1934? I question the nature of the Irish Free State's presence. jnestorius(talk) 14:35, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added Trinidad to the list (dunno how to get the flag template to work). Still dubious of Irish Free State, mind; the CGF doesn't list it. jnestorius(talk) 14:56, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: 15, 16, or 17 teams?

message: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w8nd9tqaXR8 At around the 1:04 mark, the Newfoundland delegation appears to be using their red ensign.1982vdven (talk) 22:57, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Flag of Newfoundland in 1934
Talk:Hradec Králové

message: I don't know if it's trying to list streets or what, but I deleted the "Neighbourhoods" section on the grounds of "what the hell". 90.178.52.11 (talk) 15:15, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  neighborhoods 

message: "Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove" is linked to the article about "medical school". Brilliant.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.26.165.27 (talk) 12:23, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link 
Talk:Ş

message: Isn't Timişoara Romanian?  Thus it should according to the article be s-comma not s-cedilla.  In its own article it's spelt with s-cedilla, and the page is named Timisoara (i.e. plain 's', no redirects).  Joestynes 09:22, 3 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, but many OSes (using default settings) cannot display s-comma, including AFAIK all Microsoft OSes prior to Windows XP. bogdan ʤjuʃkə | Talk 17:47, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It's nearly impossible for the average reader to determine how this letter sounds in English.  It would help to have a common sense description instead of leaving it at the inscrutable "voiceless postalveolar fricative". Tmangray (talk) 19:31, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Insufficient Description

message: At least on eml.wikipedia, I can also see some ş usages in some articles and templates, can someone who speak it please explain, and if necessary, extend the article here? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:38, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Emilian-Romagnol]] usages?
Talk:Leonardo DiCaprio

message: I propose of updating the infobox photo to a more recent 2023 photo. EleniXDD (talk) 17:32, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  I propose of updating the infobox image. 

message: Remove Camila Morrone 2601:151:C300:F640:E429:8FAD:B725:F2DD (talk) 14:14, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: no reason given for the proposed removal. M.Bitton (talk) 14:51, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 23 March 2024 

message: The redirect Leo Di has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:22, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Fine friend 180.195.211.116 (talk) 07:13, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Leo Di]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: It says Leo won the academy award for best picture and best actor for Wolf of Wall Street. This is incorrect They were nominations and the language should be more clear. Thanks. Colforbind (talk) 20:54, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Myrealnamm (💬talk · ✏️contribs) at 21:30, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: This error was present when the request was opened but was fixed a few minutes later. Jamedeus (talk) 21:33, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 15 May 2024
Talk:Scotch pie

message: I deleted the comment "Much like shephard's [sic] pie".  I'm not sure what it meant.  Did it mean that a Scotch pie is much like a shepherd's pie (not true), or that shepherd's pie is served at football matches (something I can't confirm or deny)? --Heron 10:01, 3 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleted comment
Talk:Columbia (supercomputer)

message: I have contacted SGI regarding the copyright status of the images on their website. --  Ævar Arnfjörð [ Bjarmason]   10:51, 2004 Nov 3 (UTC)
Is "Lumen Christi is a bad school" supposed to be there...? :/ I'm new to this but that seems off!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.17.246.95 (talk) 20:07, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Railway roundhouse

message: [Barrow Hill, Derbyshire, England: includes a list of other worldwide roundhouses]was found to be a broken link  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rubi-Wan-Kenobi (talk • contribs) 17:32, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Broken links

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.warwickshirerailways.com/lms/curzonstreet_shed.htm. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Snowycats (talk) 05:03, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Legendary

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
* Support. I had previously suggested that there was no clear primary topic, but I think I was mistaken, and that this move would be good. However the mentions of Hagiography and the South English Legendary should be left in here.  Legend should be linked at the top, per MOS:DAB. HTH. -- Quiddity (talk) 03:48, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:World Park Base

message: This article looks pretty biased to me... anyone else think it needs to be objectified a bit? Grutness 12:49, 3 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Is this objective enough?
Talk:La Paz Department (Bolivia)

message: It seems to mean that La Paz Department is quite a separate entity from the city of La Paz, Bolivia, as much as New York City is from New York State.  They should remain two separate articles, with the material at the bottom of La Paz, Bolivia, being copied to La Paz Department, but probably still remaining on the city page as well for geographic context.
Agreed?--Pharos 13:06, 3 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Scott Interrante

message: can we have some dates, venues, tv shows listed? even any public performances. certainly must be dates for shows for magicians? can't quite see notability. has 1981 listing as a stunt perfomer on IMDB films database. no press quotes and dates? its just that for WIKI purposes the no doubt GREAT work of this guy does not register as notable. no hard feelings Tiksustoo 11:42, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  dates/names/venues..notability
Talk:Ice rink

message: I don't know how to edit a page or properly leave a comment. Your article on the first ice rink http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ice_rink seems to be different from the information here.
historyhouse.co.uk/articles/artificial_ice_rink.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.148.175.223 (talk) 11:01, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This may be a regional thing, but in the southeastern United States where I live, a "skating rink" can describe both a roller skating or an ice skating venue. These would normally be qualified as a "roller skating rink" or an "ice skating rink". Here in Florida, if not qualified, one would assume that it was a roller skating rink. 
I would have assumed when searching for "skating rink", that a generic article would have come up with links to roller skating and ice skating rinks. What gives?
:Right. I think I have fixed that. See skating rink. Miguel Andrade 04:53, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why did "skating rink" redirect here? 

message: I've rolled back some edits that look like product placement edits and are only supported by primary (company) sources. Any claims to largest ice rink need a reliable, secondary source. ʘ alaney2k ʘ (talk) 16:15, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I just cited the skatetheoval.com website in support of the "largest facility" claim before reading the discussion. Sorry, if you need to roll back. Jcflnj (talk) 10:59, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Product placement edits 

message: According to this old newspaper article:
*
So is this source incorrect or is the Wikipedia article wrong? -- PBS (talk) 12:40, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 
Talk:Microsoft Office SharePoint Portal Server

message: :Office SharePoint Portal Server, on the other hand, is a web application for building Intranets and Extranets.  You use it to build out internal sites with information of use to people around the company.  It does have a lot of project management capabilities, but it leans more towards the "strategic" side of things, as opposed to Groove which is more "tactical".  One nice thing about SharePoint is that people (management, etc.) can peer in on the status of a project without needing any software other than a web browser... permissions control is pretty flexible, too, and it has some workflow features like document approval and versioning that bigger businesses dealing with important documents will probably want.
:Microsoft definitely doesn't have their product literature sorted out with this stuff yet, so yeah, it's a bit confusing.  Groove is some pretty cool software though, much nicer than anything Microsoft has produced for team-based file sharing, synchronization, and project management.  Warrens 00:20, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Headline text 

message: This disambiguation page contains only 4 pertainent links.  1 of these links to a nonexistant page, and 2 of them appear to have been merged.  Sorting things by date does not appear particularly nessisary.  So long as there are no objections, I plan to rewrite this page.--Verdatum 13:53, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite? 

message: I came here to try and discover information about whether MOSS will meet my need for a combined Wiki/CMS to host process and procedure documentation. I'd welcome some information about whether MOSS addresses these functions. Hubris67 05:29, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  MOSS vs Wiki vs CMS 

message: I thought I would list a few blog links here for the article to link to 
- Matthew Cosier
:That's really not necessary, thanks.  Wikipedia is not a directory of links. Kuru talk 00:32, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blogs 

message: Removed a thinly disguised link to a site selling info on portal services.  Does not provide any useful information on this topic. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 209.115.26.19 (talk) 18:54, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  External references 

message: Features of SharePoint 
In general, SharePoint contains all of the features you would expect from a portal or collaboration tool: 
•	Browser-based customization of page 
•	Browser-based content administration 
•	Aggregation capabilities 
•	Document Repository 
•	Message board 
•	Ad-hoc data storage 
•	E-mail notifications 
•	Announcements, event calendar and contact list.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.225.35.3 (talk) 10:17, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bhavana Batwal 

message: I have removed the WikiProject tag, as this article is either a redirect or deleted. If you oppose, please restore the tag. Thank you, fahadsadah (talk,contribs) 15:55, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikiproject Computing
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Fact and Reference Check/Howto

message: This article is a rough draft of a Help document for empowering the workforce driving Wikipedia closer to being a quintessentially authoritative source for reliable information. The effort is very tiny so far, but if we come up with some uniform methods and tools for making the tasks easier for all contributers, perhaps we can get more Wikipedians on board. Quinobi 13:45, 3 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Talk:List of rivers of Asia

message: What makes a river "major"?  Is there any sort of rough guideline we should follow, in terms of what rivers should not be included?  Or would it be better to remove the word "major" altogether?Visviva 14:44, 3 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I'm not sure whether there is a viable way of organizing this list but one major way is by where their mouths are (e.g., flow into the Arctic Ocean, flow into the Black Sea, etc.).  Then organize in some geographic way (e.g., east to west for the Arctic ocean, clockwise for the Black Sea). Short description indicating the areas they (including tributaries) drain. Tributaries should not be listed unless they are very significant in their own right. So for instance one might have the [[Caspian Sea] then list the Volga River, Ural River, Sefīd-Rūd, Atrek,  Terek (river), and Kura (river) (I think this is the clockwise order).  On the other hand we could work on using the categories appropriately. --Erp (talk) 06:41, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Organization
Talk:Discworld II: Missing Presumed...!?

message: There's a duplicate page here: Discworld 2: Missing_Presumed...!?
Also, can someone who owns the game please check whether it is subtitled "Mortality Bites" or "Mortality Bytes"?  I've seen many iterations of both on Google searches (and Amazon.com thinks it's "Morality Bites"!).
:Looking at a number of game boxes; I'd say it's definitely Mortality Bytes!. -- Quoth 03:36, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This is a call to arms to make the Terry Pratchett article a Featured Article. It will greatly help the cause if all the side articles that link from it are of a reasonable standard. Terry Pratchett has around 40 side articles (ie the ones relating to his work) - I don't think they are all expected to be GA (Good Article) standard for TP to become featured, but certain basic elements will be looked at for sure. 
A full list of the sub articles is here on the TP talk page: I'm posting this comment on the talk pages of each article on the list. Editors reading may also like to help with the TP article too? 
The main issue, especially with smaller articles, is often a finding reasonable amount of citations, and prose can sometimes be a little  POV too. Coverage of the topic is probably less important, but of course it needs to be reasonably good. --Matt Lewis (talk) 15:24, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Making [[Terry Pratchett]] a Featured Article
Talk:Esterification

message: have you observed any esterified products with benzoic acid and sorbitol at a pH of 2.5-3.
Hi 
I have drawn 3 pictures of the mechanism of Esterification for the german articel about Esterification. I have not labelled them, so that you can use them for the english articel, too (if you like).
: Who are you? Where are the images? Cacycle 11:42, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Troodon

message: The page mentions that Troodon fossils there are from much larger species, but we should probably have the exact sizes listed  Crylophosaurus (talk) 20:36, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure if much has been published on it, and I suspect it will be named as a new genus, so the info won't belong here anyway in the end. FunkMonk (talk) 22:03, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: highly doubt it is a new genus, but okay  Crylophosaurus (talk) 06:26, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Even if it isn't a new genus, it might just as well be Stenonychosaurus. Better to wait until there's actually a publication that determines it. FunkMonk (talk) 13:44, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  There should probably be more information on the Prince Creek Remains
Talk:Hardwood

message: There is a list of hardwoods here as well afic names]]. Should these be merged, perhaps?
Ehn 15:50, 3 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed; several of the descriptions here are inaccurate too. I'd be inclined to discard them, and keep to the list at List of woods - MPF 23:14, 4 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: A List of Hardwoods

message: Does anyone know what type of wood this is? 24.203.137.181 03:45, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: I am not following the first sentance in paragraph 4. Can someone clarify what is meant by not safe?
"Hardwoods are generally not safe but far more resistant to decay than softwoods when used for exterior work."
Johnbroecher (talk) 16:58, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What? 1+1=yes (talk) 02:24, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification 

message: The first paragraph has vandalism with the last 2 revisions. The offending additions are in the introduction paragraph itself. The text: Allen Iverson is not as cool as Gerald Wallace.
cheesecake is awsome because  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.109.70.252 (talk) 18:31, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: Guys, I wanted to know what hardwood is ("wood that is hard") but instead I got "deciduous trees and broad-leaf evergreen" mumbo jumbo. Take a look at the entry for "engineered wood" and see how they define it right at the top. Even in Google, if you enter "engineered wood" define. But try it with "hardwood" define.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2800:40:28:67C:5532:8277:CBA9:8576 (talk) 19:47, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion 

message: "Hardwood is wood from dicot trees."
"Hardwood (which come from angiosperm trees)..."
Huh? This makes no sense. 1+1=yes (talk) 02:29, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistency 

message: In the "Chemistry" section, "consists" is misspelled as "consistis." I am unable to edit to fix this. 75.237.170.146 (talk) 14:16, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 14:17, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typo
Talk:Under These Rocks and Stones

message: As written the article claims the lyrics of "Surrounded" generated controversy. I don't remember any controversy, and looking at the lyrics myself, I don't see anything that might have been considered edgy or taboo even at the time. That's not to say it wasn't, but I'm thinking if the article is going to say there was a controversy, it should both explain the nature of the controversy and provide sources. 50.72.166.225 (talk) 02:00, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.  I removed this unsourced statement.  Hoof Hearted (talk) 14:48, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Surrounded" controversial?
Talk:V16 engine

message: Nobody mentioned the bugatti veyron in this article.
:The Bugatti Veyron has a W16 engine, not a V16. TomTheHand 01:18, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Bugatti Veyron

message: The earliest V16 I've ever heard of is one from a French manufacturer named Antoinette that built it for use in their Antoinette VII aircraft.  The Antoinette VII is listed as using either a 50 hp V8 or a 100 hp V16, so I wonder if the V16 might not be two of their V8s on a common crankshaft.
I have no solid references on the existence of such a V16 engine, and the best online sources I have found were model builders building models of the V16 version of the Antoinette VII.  Does anyone know of any reliable references to the existence of an Antoinette V16 in 1909 or 1910?
Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, SamBlob (talk) 00:17, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Antoinette V16 

message: does it have 16 pistons?????  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 197.225.76.31 (talk) 21:59, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  V16 engine 

message: One of the only modern production car with a V16 engine, and no mention of it in the article 103.249.89.37 (talk) 08:39, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: V16_engine#Production_carsYBSOne (talk) 14:12, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cizeta Moroder V16T 

message: — Assignment last updated by Ahlluhn (talk) 00:58, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: 4A Wikipedia Assignment