lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Mil Mi-6

message: Well, its obvious that Mi-26 is a really new helicopter, not a Mi-6 variant.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.9.33.238 (talk) 13:54, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You are 100% right.Agre22 (talk) 15:04, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed in both articles.--Piotr Mikołajski (talk) 15:10, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Mi-26 isn't a variant of Mi-6

message: Is there a variant of it being an ASW helicopter as it certainly looks like one? 68.202.26.86 (talk) 09:08, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  ASW Helicopter 

message: I seem to remember that back in the early 1990's, one of the variants was also thought being called the Mi-20 with the military. Not sure any more which one, but I think this was the Mi-6VKP. Anybody out there who can confirm or deny? --Antheii (talk) 14:06, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Variants; Mi-20?
Talk:Sviatopolk II of Kiev

message: Where was it recently demonstrated that Svyatopolk was illegitimate? I think that this reference should be added as a footnote or in a section titled "References" at the end of the article. --Theo  (Talk) 10:40, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mil Mi-4

message: AFAIK - it was copyed from helicopter that came to USSR as a gift from US President during Chrushev visit to this country. Can this be confirmed or smth?--Oleg Str (talk) 08:59, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it wasn't, as the Soviet Union never received such a gift. This helicopter is superficially similar to the H-19 (mostly because of the cockpit stepped-up above the engine compartment), as is noted in the article, but the mechanics are completely different, as are the size and technical characteristics; they are merely two different helicopters of a similar design. Asharidu (talk) 22:10, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Copied from American helicopter?
Talk:Foul Mile

message: I'd dispute this, since Battle is in East Sussex, and in fact is on the eastern border of the county (I'd guess more than 8 miles from the boundary).
Don't know who wrote the above - you should sign things! - but you are only half the distance! It is at least 17 miles to the west before West Sussex is reached. Peter Shearan 11:21, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Sabaragamuwa Province

message: I removed the following sentence, as I can't make out what it's trying to say:
In ratnapura city most popular for grms and sabaragamu maha saman devalaya
I've added a couple of details (as it stood, the article was enigmatic, to say the least), but it could probably be expanded considerably by someone who knows something about it... Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 11:40, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The name of the article has never been discussed here, so I moved it back to the original name pending discussion. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:59, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Myasishchev M-50

message: Data quoted from http://www.aviation.ru/Mya/#50 by the owner of aviation.ru
The article to which you have linked mentions only 1960, not 1957, but does not give a clear indication whether this refers to the original M-50 flight or the M-52 version. http://www.aerospaceweb.org/aircraft/bomber/m50/ suggests 27th October 1959. Adrian M. H. 21:25, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Could we clear this up? The article at present contradicts itself. Drutt (talk) 12:58, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In describing an Aviation Week article on Soviet nuclear-powered aircraft, this article states: "In reality, however, the article was a hoax." Really? This is established as fact? Citation? Given the difficulty in ascertaining what the Soviets were doing during the Cold War, there is no doubt that speculation might have carried the day with respect to this article, but a hoax implies that the magazine was intentionally attempting to deceive people. Doubt a reputable publication like Aviation Week would do that.
: Second that. 2A01:CB0C:CD:D800:247F:611:3DDB:4940 (talk) 14:12, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Hoax?
Talk:Tupolev TB-3

message: Data quoted from http://www.aviation.ru/Tu/#ANT-6 by the owner of aviation.ru
:Article completely rewritten with data from Shavrov. - Emt147 Burninate! 00:44, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Old talk

message: This article lacks page numbers to its citations and is missing a few cites, neither of which is acceptable for an A-class article. I propose to drop it to a C-class unless someone fixes its problems.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:45, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, it will drop to Start because MILHIST doesn't use C. -MBK004 23:52, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to delist from A-class 

message: by Boris Chertok, now in English as NASA SP-2005-4110 has some information about this plane's development and production 207.195.18.171 (talk) 11:20, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rockets and People
Talk:Tupolev Tu-2

message: The article seems pretty good, but a couple of things jumped out at me. The first is the year of production and entry into service, mentioned as 1941 and 1942, respectively. I've always been under the impression that, regardless of when they started building the things, the Tu-2 only entered service in 1944. On a related, more nitpicky, note, the line in the introduction about it being one of the outstanding aircraft of the war seems a bit overblown, if only because of its relatively limited time in service. I didn't edit anything in or out of the article, just thought I'd raise a point or two.--172.162.94.88 (talk) 01:44, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, after consulting my own very limited sources on the aircraft, it does seem that it was around that early in the war, but that it did not enter into widespread service until 1944.--172.162.5.40 (talk) 08:44, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  A couple of issues 

message: The bomb load seems very large for a twin-engined aircraft of the time. I know nothing - but are the quoted figures correct? Regards,Notreallydavid (talk) 23:51, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bomb load 

message: The map of operators does not include Indonesia, which is included in the list of operators. 122.150.92.52 (talk) 21:34, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: No source was provided for the Tu-2's Indonesian service.  I've added a citation needed tag.  We must first determine if the information is accurate before updating the map. - ZLEA T\C 21:51, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Operators map incomplete
Talk:Yermolayev Yer-2

message: Data quoted from http://www.aviation.ru/okb.php#yer by the owner of aviation.ru
I have completely revised and expanded this article and put it in the new WPAVIATION format.Petebutt (talk) 09:36, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Hi there, I was looking at this article (which I think is very good), and was wondering if there was a neater way to present the list of variants on this and other military aircraft articles. I experimented, and drew up the table below based on this list in this article - what do the prinicpal editors think, is this better than the straight list?--Jackyd101 (talk) 23:38, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggested table

message: DB-240, Yer-2/ACh-30B, Yer-2/AM-37, and Yer-2/M-40F  → Yermolayev Yer-2
The content of these article can easily be explained in the context of the main article, and the main article is of a reasonable size that the merging will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. These are all minor variants, none of which entered production. As an aside, all of these are incorrectly titled, as the Manufacturer's name is missing. - BilCat (talk) 17:58, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: None of these are worthy of their own articles and should be merged into this article.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:53, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

text: If you view them not worthy just tag for deletion, all of the contents of the pages come from here. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 21:52, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The content was COPIED from the Yer-2 article in the first place, so it isn't a merge (unless there is more content), just change to re-directs--Petebutt (talk) 01:24, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Some of them have their own infoboxes, and/or their own specs lists, so they do have some new content overall. - BilCat (talk) 03:13, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Specs are essentially irrelevant as the policy is for specs for variants should be written into text (where different). Info boxes similarly are irrelevant as any info in them can be incorporated in the text / variant section.--Petebutt (talk) 15:05, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: My point is mainly dealing with attribution, in which the user added to the information he copied. He didn't simply copy text from the main article. We both agree that the split articles shouldn't exist, and that's the main point here. - BilCat (talk) 15:23, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: These should all be merged, as none are notable or that unique in and of themselves, and the small amount of added content will easily fit into the parent article. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 23:43, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge discussion
Talk:Yakovlev Yak-2

message: Data quoted from http://www.aviation.ru/Yak/#2 by the owner of aviation.ru
Doesn't make sense...it was "...the fastest aircraft in the Soviet Union, able to reach 352 km/h (219 mph)" but after additional weight "...the maximum speed had declined to 515 km/h (320 mph)".  One of these two numbers is wrong...205.193.97.2 (talk) 15:16, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Good catch. I'd switched the mph and kmh values. Fixed now.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:25, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lavochkin La-9

message: Green is cited as a reference, yet Green states the first deliveries of the La-9 were just before the end of the war, which conflicts with this article's statement that the prototype was finished in 1946.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Karlwk (talk • contribs) 04:54, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Service Dates
Talk:Lavochkin La-11

message: So, the “developed from” section of the infobox currently has the La-130 listed, which was the prototype of the La-9.
My understanding is that the prototype of the La-11 was the La-9M, also called the La-134. The La-11 was developed once the La-9 was already extant, so why would it be developed from the La-9’s prototype?
Thoughts? MWFwiki (talk) 11:24, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  “Developed From”
Talk:Tupolev I-4

message: I used the Wayback Machine to archive a dead web. In the web was an article called "I-4", and it had some specifications for the aircraft. However, the specifications shown in the article were different, and there were two variants. One was called "I-4" and the other "I-4 Zveno". Could I edit the "Specifications" section? If you want to take a look, go to this link! RandomGuy3114 (talk), 15:43, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Specifications source?
Talk:Yakovlev Yak-1

message: The text of this article needs a complete rewrite for English, grammar, and historical details. I'll get to it eventually (just finished Yak-3... can't stand anymore Yaks for now) unless someone else wants to do it. - Emt147 Burninate! 00:23, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I ended up rewriting much of the article. Specs were changed to Yak-1b as the most representative type (Yak-1M was a Yak-3 prototype and as such had little to do with production Yak-1's). I-33 was taken out of the variants list for now because I couldn't find any information on it (and some places list it as a Yak-3 prototype anyway). - Emt147 Burninate! 08:45, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  excellent! few links for I-33 i could find:
* references I-33 as "Yak-3 M-106 (experimental)".
* I-33 - small series in 1943. retired as unreliable for engine faults.
* english
* english
--jno 10:33, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

text: So that's two for Yak-3 and two for Yak-1. I think we should hold out until something more definitive than websites with uncited sources comes along. - Emt147 Burninate! 17:20, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: yes, Stepanets and Shavrov give no point.
Just for fun: Yak-3 flight manual --jno 11:07, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: The lead-in praises Yak-1 so much it reads almost like an advertisement for the plane, yet the "Design and Development" section describes an almost total disaster, and even implies that the plane would never enter production if it wasn't for Yakovlev's familiarity with Stalin. 46.215.134.86 (talk) 05:47, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  There is some serious discrepancy between the lead in and the body of the article 
Talk:Coscoroba swan

message: Chile and central Argentina south to Tierra del Fuego and the Falkland Islands. In winter it flies north to central Chile, northern Argentina, Uruguay and the south east tip of Brazil. 
Hang on. Is it a swan or a duck? --Pauldanon 12:46, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It used to be classified as a true swan, now it is not. It is distantly related to a swan. But it is still closer to a swan, than closer to a duck or closer to a goose.
99.31.154.44 (talk)Nancy  —Preceding undated comment added 04:15, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Swan has another take on the degree of "swaniness" of the Coscoroba Swan.
188.100.204.101 (talk) 15:48, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction with swan
Talk:Robert Carr (disambiguation)

message: ----
It is proposed to move this page to Robert Carr (disambiguation) and then move Leonard Robert Carr, Baron Carr of Hadley (who is always referred to as Robert Carr, never Leonard Robert Carr) to this location, following discussion on Talk:Leonard Robert Carr, Baron Carr of Hadley. If no-one objects, I'll make the move in a week. Timrollpickering 12:47, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Yakovlev Yak-15

message: The aircraft in the Wadim Sadoroschny Museeum is a replica...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.37.166.242 (talk) 13:02, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Surviving aircraft 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources.  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 06:20, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Yakovlev Yak-17

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources.  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:14, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Jamie Stewart (singer)

message: Uh..did he really marry his cousin Caralee?
I thought it was someone else.
Is it important to note that he is bisexual?  This seems an odd inclusion in a 1 paragraph entry.
Yes, I think it's important.  If you listen to the lyrics in some of the songs in Xiu Xiu, he talks about being with a man sexually.  Oreo 8 March 2007
:Every bit as essential as the suicide of his father.  From a certain critical perspective, it's actually irrelevant to mention that he's actually also attracted to women.  If you put him in the generational/era category of Spencer Krug and Owen Pallett, for instance.  69.49.44.11 (talk) 09:50, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Married
Talk:Browning School

message: Can someone with current information update the page? The school no longer has 375 studentsWhiteknight666 (talk) 02:37, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Can someone confirm if Harison Ford went here? The school sends out bulletins about what other alumni are working on, and, as an alumnus, I can not remember seeing his name anywhere. If he was an alumnus, I'm sure the school would have mentioned it somewhere.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.116.85.246 (talk) 06:21, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alumni Abuse
Template talk:PreEuroCurrencies

message: In the template PreEuroCurrencies : 
*Other EU British pound 
In the template Currencies of Europe
*Western Guernsey... Pound sterling  
As for me, British Pound is beter, because the name of the country is in teh name of the currency. Marc. --Flafla89 14:08, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: British pound or Pound sterling ?

message: 
:I'm not sure why WorldCurrencies template was included here, but it was putting this page into categories, so I nowiki'ed it. Ingrid 22:55, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Currencies

message: Is there a reason why Gibraltar pound is here? --Chochopk 01:02, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes – Gibraltar is part of the European Union, and would introduce the euro the same way the UK would. —Nightstallion (?) 09:31, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Guernsey, Jersey, and Isle of Man are not? --Chochopk 19:05, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, they are not; in fact, they are not even part of the United Kingdom, technically speaking. —Nightstallion (?) 13:23, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you verify or list the source of your statement? --Siva1979Talk to me 01:41, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Take a good, long look at our fine article crown dependency; the UK's head of state just also happens to be the head of state of Gy, Jy and the IoM at the same time. —Nightstallion (?) 01:03, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gibraltar pound
Talk:DC++

message: I removed the addition of SababaDC for two reasons. Firstly, the list of mods is becoming a bit long. It already takes up a hefty chunk of the page. Secondly, there were just too many things listed for it. It looked a bit ridiculous. In that vein, I'm tempted to chop out some of the bullets from StrongDC as well ... --TheParanoidOne 23:00, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  SababaDC 

message: Why are hubs advantageous?  Why can't the entire userbase of dc++ be a single hub, so that one can locate just about any file?  It would be so much stronger if everybody on the network where connected, no? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.80.214.158 (talk) 14:59, August 30, 2006.
:The design of the protocol does not lend itself to that.  It could be argued that one of the Direct Connect's network advantages is being decentralized, allowing users to form their own communities based on whatever criteria they're comfortable with.  Your point about the lack of a global search is one I've seen before, and it has merit from an end user point of view.  --GargoyleMT 18:41, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Try to search with at least 10'000 users, and you will be overwhelmed with results, if your search-string is popular enough. You'll see the needed file with very first results, but the line would be immediately scrolled out of the screen (by sorting) as more and more results arrive. You just won't be able to select the file and start downloading until you finish to receive all those answers, which could take very long. Just image what if web search engines listed every site in a couple of million findings on a single page — that would be disastrous. :) 217.172.21.161 (talk) 08:03, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Hubs

message: The NMDC part of the article is incorrect. DC++ support even more specific information than that. IIRC, file names and users are supported as well. Anyway, it's an easy check in the source. My point is, does the NMDC protocol support everything that DC++ does, or does NMDC just support dchub://hub:port (as this info would be nice to know in the NMDC article)? I don't have a copy of the NMDC client so I can't check with that (and most results on Google seem to be malware). --Ullner 13:47, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Supported hub address URLs 

message: I don't know if its just me not knowing terms but it seems there was vandalism added at the same time the information itself was added in the greylink section, there are multiple mentions of hubs having balls and drugs. --ryan_the_leach (talk) 15:45, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism
Talk:SS Ohio (1940)

message: The original article was taken from here. I have removed most of the content to prevent copyright issues, and changed the rest. JoaoRicardo 14:15, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The book At All Costs link is the wrong book, there was no page for the right book. The right book was written by Sam Moses. Noha307 20:50, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  At All Costs 

message: I found that the previous versions did not emphasize the importance of this ship for the Maltese nation...i figured more ought to be said on this ship and the role it played in the war. Reuv 20:45, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major rebuild 

message: This is not ready.  It lacks a good description of the career of the ship prior to its final journey.  Other material is not in date order and is thereby confusing.  There is a also a touch of sentimentality in some of the text which is, after all, just about a ship. Hmains 00:51, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  good article 

message: The record as related in the second section doesn't 'add up'. The time (108 hours) and distance (1882 miles) means 17.4 miles per hour, not knots. (?) AMCKen (talk) 20:03, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That would depend on whether the distance quoted is in nautical miles, or statute miles. If the former, then knots would be correct; if the latter, then mph would be correct. Mjroots (talk) 13:37, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Speed record

message: I've swapped the 'entering Grand Harbour' and 'discharging' photos because the GH photo is better known, at least on the European side of the 'pond'. It is more dramatic and therfore more likely to get the attention (being above the infobox), of a browsing reader.  RASAM (talk) 22:51, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Swapping pictures 

message: There is nowhere called "Dunglass" anywhere on the Clyde.
2001:8B0:7B75:4D1E:745A:4659:C694:AA18 (talk) 23:53, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dunglass