lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ansbert (6th century)

message: This whole article is full of statements that are highly doubtful. None of the sources and quotes comes from a contemporaine source. Take for example the date of bearth of Ansbertus. The article gives 2 possible dates. However the primary source that is used gives NONE. More over that very primary source is doubtful. It is contradicted by another source. All problems concerning interpretation of the sources are given by Christian Settipani in his book Prehistoire des Capetiens. The article however adresses none of these problems and gives an account of the primary source that is rather dubious and not in line with the familytree Settipani gives in this book.
On the other hand this article sais interesting things like that Arnoald was margrave of the Scheldt. This may be true, or not, but what I would like to see is a primary source for it. You see, dear Alex, when I place a tag for additional sources this is not because I doubt, or question the fact, it is only because I think that an additional source may be useful, for example for students who need such a source, or for people that are interested and want to learn more. Placing of a tag for additional sources is NOT a negative comment on the work done by a previous editor. And I hope you are not against giving extra information? After all man is only born once, not twice and it may be interesting to see why this article gives two dates of birth. johanthon (talk) 13:59, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The use of sources, such as [[Christian Settipani]]

message: The Waldrada link on this page concerns Waldrada as the wife of Chlothar II.  Either that reference is incorrect, or this page's contention that she is a wife of Chlothar I is incorrect.  In other Wiki articles, it appears that Chlothar I was the husband of Ingund and they in turn were the parents of Blithilde, the wife of Ansbertus, the Gallo-Roman Senator. 
Wstander (talk) 14:55, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Waldrada attached to incorrect Chlothar 

message: "The chronological problems with the line as presented, have led modern genealogists to try to re-construct the line in various ways to fix them."
I would, and I am sure others, would like to hear more on this, as it is currently only a vague pointer to a problem. This Statement itself leads to the need of expanding it. Else it is superfluous. What are the Chronological Problems? Who has reconstructed it? And in what other ways aside from the one example? Collision-Shift (talk) 03:34, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chronological Problems 

message: The Clodius link goes to a generic Clodius. Is there a specific Clodius that could be more specifically mentioned? --Stultiwikiatext me 12:36, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clodius wikilink
Talk:International Actuarial Association

message: This seems to be copied directly from a website. That may be an issue. -- Avi 16:37, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yup, copyvio out of http://www.actuaries.org and thus removed. -- Avi 16:41, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright violations

message: This is a branch of the IAA. Not notable on own merits Rogermx (talk) 21:19, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[International Association of Consulting Actuaries]] into [[International Actuarial Association]] 

message: Part of IAA.  Not notable on its own Rogermx (talk) 21:20, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[International Association of Consulting Actuaries]] into [[International Actuarial Association]]
Talk:Paulie Provenzano

message: I think a picture of Paulie in civillain clothes and/or at least one with speech bubbles, would work much better. If I could get on it (no scanner) or knew what the heck I was doing (no clue) I would. Lots42 00:08, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: I think the name of this article should be changed.  He was never called Omerta.JoeyFNK (talk) 02:36, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Name Change 
Talk:Monstra

message: I'm redirecting this to go to [Glossary_of_ancient_Roman_religion#monstrum]]. The current stub is an orphan, it's unreferenced, it's been tagged for ages, and there is no reason to believe that some individual character from a comic book has notability by our standards. A redirect to X-men is an option, but not one supported by Google Books, which gives 189 hits, most of them impertinent, for "monstra" and "x-men". "monstra" and "monstrosity", on the other hand, has almost 5,000 hits, of which the first ten are already to the point. Drmies (talk) 15:50, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It can be merged to the new characters lists; if you want a redirect, you can move this to Monstra (comics) first. 129.33.19.254 (talk) 00:37, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect
Talk:Antoon Jozef Witteryck

message: In this edit summary, instead of the Biographie Nationale de Belgique, I meant the related but distinct Nationaal Biografisch Woordenboek. I can't seem to link directly to the entry but it can be found by going to this page and searching for "Witteryck". – Arms & Hearts (talk) 14:17, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Continuation of my edit summary...
Talk:Aquilla B. Caldwell

message: It seems from the Lewis West Virginia history book, and the gravestone photographed in the findagrave article that he actually used his middle name and only his first initial. I'm not sure when I'll have time to check the West Virginia reports, but I'm pretty sure the other photograph in teh findagrave article has the signature of a different man (who also spelled his first name differently) and who lived in the upper Susquehanna valley in Pennsylvania.Jweaver28 (talk) 15:44, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name change
Talk:Groundscraper thrush

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Psophocichla litsitsirupa (Etosha).jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on November 14, 2015. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2015-11-14. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:59, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Psophocichla litsitsirupa (Etosha).jpg]] to appear as POTD soon 

message: The redirect Turdus simensis, has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Plantdrew (talk) 19:58, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Turdus simensis,]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Break Ya Neck

message: It's a minor viral hit. Reads like the kind of thing the guy in the video himself would write.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 177.102.121.17 (talk) 23:58, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the Watsky bit relevant at all? 
Talk:Armin Vilas

message: Armin Vilas died a few years ago in Salzburg, Austria.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.169.40.10 (talk) 15:17, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
File talk:石林正门.JPG

message: what did they write and why?
:What does this question mean?
::The writing you see in the foto says: Stone forest [you read it, according to ancient chinese writing rules, from right to left]. The sign marks the main entrance of Shilin. --Tschips (talk) 08:23, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: Why does the sign say 林石 instead of 石林? Badagnani (talk) 02:17, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The writing you see in the foto says: Stone forest [you read it, according to ancient chinese writing rules, from right to left]. The sign marks the main entrance of Shilin. --Tschips (talk) 08:23, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Name on sign
Talk:Madawaska River (Ontario)

message: I stopped the redirects and created separate entries for Upper Madawaska River Provincial Park and Lower Madawaska River Provincial Park. Padraic 16:53, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

message: I have added a few references but they are commented out for the moment; for some reason the Atlas of Canada site is down on the weekend, again, so I can't added all the correct parameters to them. I anticipate being able to do so within a few days once the AoC is up again. --papageno (talk) 18:36, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commented out references 
Talk:Dravidian civilization

message: Wiki Raja 08:17, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Dravidian civilizations

message: Please stop isolating south india from the rest of the country. You guys are dragging other South indian states along with you.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.48.204.40 (talk) 19:04, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  is it a seperate type of civilization? :o
Talk:B. C. Binning

message: Perryadamjones (talk) 17:34, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Binning 
Talk:Pimpin' All Over the World

message: Alternate version of the song?
I've heard an unedited version of the song where as the song fades out, what sounds like Katt Williams describes people who aren't " Pimpin' "....any details? 66.57.20.114 17:05, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

message: Is it really necessary to have the lyrics here? It just takes up space and you can find it on any other sites that specialize in lyrics 65.34.235.27 03:54, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Lyrics?

message: Nothing in the lyrics describes hatred of women in general. What the women do in the song is voluntary, and therefore, it's not truly misogynistic. 131.191.64.130 (talk) 00:05, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Casually misogynistic?
Template talk:Former PGA Tour Events

message: We Wikipedians who are going to be working on these articles should agree to some guidelines for dealing with such issues as (1) The name of the tournament changed slightly from year-to-year (e.g. 1963's Thunderbird Classic Invitational was called Thunderbird Invitational in 1959) (2) The tournament was absorbed into or merged with another event (e.g. 1969's Danny Thomas-Diplomat Classic merged with the Memphis Open to form 1970's Danny Thomas Memphis Classic)
I propose a standard set of guidelines (please feel free to add to or modify this because I'm sure I haven't thought of every problem that may come up):
*Give the article the name of the last (most recent) version of the event, or in the alternative, the name under which it was played the most.
*Earlier names of the event should be redirects into the article.
*For events that are no longer played but were absorbed into events that have their own article, put these as a redirect to the article, and add relevant content to that article - rather than create a new article.--Hokeman 17:06, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Standardized Guidelines/Format for creating and maintaining articles out of this Template 

message: :Please add to this 
*The Seattle Open Invitational was called the Seattle World's Fair Open Invitational in 1962.
*The U.S. Professional Match Play Championship was called the Liggett and Myers Open Match Play Championship. I think the year of the name change was around 1971.
*The tournament sponsored by the Carling Brewing Company in the 1950s and 1960s had a bunch of names. It was called Carling's Golf Classic and then Carling Golf Classic and then Carling Open became the Carling Open Invitational which became the Carling World Open sometime between 1960 and 1964
*The St. Petersburg Open (PGA Tour event) became the St. Petersburg Open Invitational
*The Lucky International became the Lucky International Open
*The St. Paul Open became the St. Paul Open Invitational in 1957
*The Eastern Open became the Eastern Open Invitational in 1957
*Lucky International became Lucky International Open in 1962
*The Philadelphia tournament was called the Philadelphia Open early (like 1920ish) then became the Philadelphia Enquirer Open(like late 1930ish) then became the Philadelphia Daily News Open in the 1950s; and then became the Whitemarsh Open Invitational which became the Philadelphia Golf Classic which became IVB before finally going defunct. All the Philadelphia tournaments should be kept together in the same article
*The Coral Springs Open became the Coral Springs Open Invitational--Hokeman (talk) 19:33, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Special notes to consider when creating articles out of this Template
Talk:Ben Becker

message: jewish background of Ben Becker: http://www.maschiach.de/content/view/778/120/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.136.106.253 (talk) 20:00, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
Talk:Pangrati, Athens

message: This article is about the neighborhood Pagkrati in Athens, but misspelled as Pangrati. All of its contents have been copied and improved in the correct article. Hence, this article could be deleted.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimzoun (talk • contribs) 11:40, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestion for deletion, and expansion of the article Pagkrati
Talk:Bernhard Rosenkränzer

message: Could any of the external links pages provide any sources to strengthen this article? 45Factoid44 (talk) 20:05, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: I was the webmaster for, and a beta tester of, the now discontinued Ark Linux, and I still hang out in their IRC channel, where their head developer still appears. He has NEVER mentioned merging with Mandriva, nor can I find evidence of this in Google. If nobody can provide such evidence, I shall remove this claim from the article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pikidalto (talk • contribs) 22:48, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proof of claim that Ark merged with Mandriva? 
Talk:Bert Bos

message: Alright, sorry, but my reference is not working... if someone could make it work, that'd be great.
--AlanH (talk) 10:42, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference for him being chairman... 
Talk:List of Mock the Week episodes

message: would it be worth noting the winners like in HIGNFY? ATMarsdenTalk · {Semi-Retired}  21:46, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If anything, the table needs clarification, since it's confusing to read. HaikenEdge (talk) 04:51, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  I like to say that I wonder if noting down winners and such is really important.  I know that HIGNFY is fine to retain info on winners, but the winners on this show seem practically picked by the host, regardless of scores at times.  I don't think keeping tabs on the wins and such is relevant anymore, and that this should sub-article of Mock The Week should revert to just detailing the list of episodes, retaining info on the guest performers on each team. GUtt01 (talk) 20:29, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeh the points are meaningless, always have been. DOB has said so. (Do I have a refernce for same, no) Bogger (talk) 19:19, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Winners?
Talk:Justin Russo

message: Was he really born in 1989? It's quite strange to see a 7-year-old kid playing on an album!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.12.167.87 (talk) 22:19, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Absolutely not, he's in his 30s now, maybe 79 rather than 89?  More like 1975ish (mid 30s) to me tho, judging by pictures.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.97.98.188 (talk) 22:26, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting to note, re: birthdate: the actor who plays the character named "justin russo" on the Disney TV show was born in 1989.  This is surely a mistake.  I'm updating it to state 1976, because I believe that is correct, though I am unable to find 3rd party verification; however, though it's unverified, it is much more likely to be true than what it currently states, which is wildly inaccurate.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.97.98.188 (talk) 22:34, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Birthday
Talk:Bibo Bergeron

message: Content to be added from other section. Please hold
198.2.93.215 (talk) 23:48, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. I have viewed the sources, and these seem credible to me. One difficulty is that these sources are in French, and have to be easily translatable by readers. This article can also be expanded from the article on French Wikipedia. I hope consensus will be reached —CrafterNova [ TALK ]  [ CONT ] 07:12, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

text: I found the French version of Chyler Leigh's article, let's see if this is valid example here —CrafterNova [ TALK ]  [ CONT ] 05:44, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Practical application of non-English citations
Talk:Affect control theory

message: See Wikipedia:Harvard referencing. I am sorry that I upset you. I hope that you feel that the changes you made were constructive. My concern was with adherence to "Harvard-style" footnoting. To partially atone, I will edit a couple of the footnotes into closer compliance. I can't add page references, but you could. Or you could wait until someone chooses to make a specific challenge to a statement. You might want to consider which other articles would benefit by a "see also" or in-line reference to your page. DCDuring 17:25, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The references and further reading section should be integrated. -- Mdd (talk) 11:47, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations
Talk:Prince Adalbert of Bavaria (1828–1875)

message: Alexandra and Adalbert, the youngest two children of Ludwig I and Therese of Bavaria,  died on the same day (21 September 1875) and in the same city (Munich), at the ages of 49 and 47, repectively, but were buried in two different cemetaries.  
Of the 9 siblings:
Mathilde died in Darmstadt, presumably buried there, 
Hildegard died in Vienna, presumably buried there,
Adelgunde died in Munich, but was buried in Vienna (where she had lived in exile with her husband),
Maximillian II, Otto, Luitpold, and Alexandra were buried in the Theatinerkirche (Munich),
Adalbert was buried in the Michaelskirche (Munich),
and the infant Theolinde's death and burial are unknown.
My question is why wasn't Adalbert buried in the family crypt in the Theatinerkirche?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.82.249.253 (talk) 15:26, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deaths of Adalbert and his sister, Alexandra
Talk:Lawrence Downes

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/opinion/editorialboard.html?_r=0. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:23, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Jonathan Landman

message: I just started adding references to this article. I cam across one and saw that most of the writing is taken word-for-word from the source that I found. I'm working to reword this, perhaps using a timeline, or a list for the work history.  I just wanted to give a heads up, in case anyone wondered why I was revising such a large section of the BLP.
Mollifiednow (talk) 03:26, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewording work history
Talk:Saint Paul Municipal Grain Terminal

message: Does anyone know if the photo is of the correct building? When I took it, I made an educated guess.--Appraiser (talk) 18:40, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think it is. I think it is the old abandoned looking building in this picture. ~ Eóin (talk) 23:03, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you're right. I'll try to get a clearer close-up at some point.--Appraiser (talk) 13:56, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture
Talk:Anglican Diocese of Argentina

message: I see that no one has objected to my information.  Would anyone object to my altering the title of the article to reflect my understanding?  If I don't notice an objection within the next week or so, I'll alter it to comport with what I understand the correct title to be.  (I note that there are no links given to this article, so impact should be minimal.)  Firstorm (talk) 18:01, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title? 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved.  Extraordinary Writ (talk) 07:38, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Anglican Bishop of Argentina →  – The history on this page refers to the diocese; consistency with other articles on Anglican dioceses in Global South to have "Anglican bishop of" redirect to "Anglican Diocese of" rather than vice versa (eg Anglican bishop of Jerusalem, Anglican Bishop of Abuja) Dclemens1971 (talk) 16:03, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 7 March 2024
Talk:Roman Catholic Diocese of Nola

message: I removed the Italian Republic flag (of 1946) icon from the Infobox, in accordance with several sections of WP:ICON; specifically (quoting),
* Generally, flag icons should not be used in infoboxes, even when there is a "country", "nationality" or equivalent field: they are unnecessarily distracting and give undue prominence to one field among many....
*Flags make simple, blunt statements about nationality, while words can express the facts with more complexity. [The Italian flag removed was that of the Republic of Italy, not created until 1946. Since 1984, Italy has no longer had a state religion.]....
*Do not rewrite history. Flags should not be used to misrepresent the nationality of a historical figure [including some bishops], event, object, etc. Political boundaries change, often over the span of a biographical article subject's lifetime. Where ambiguity or confusion could result, it is better not to use a flag at all, and where one is genuinely needed, use the historically accurate flag.
Vicedomino (talk) 03:52, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed flag of Italian Republic from Infobox