Talk:Continental union

message: While I agree with Zebulin above that this article shouldn't exist, I'll say this at least:
The basis for putting Australia on the list is that it occupies an entire continent. However, it is the only sovereign state on the continent, and there are no treaties/"whatever"s binding it to cooperate with other sovereign states on that continent (trivially). 
The argument that Australia (the sovereign state) itself is some kind of federation is irrelevant, as the members of the federation are/were not sovereign.
I have been bold and have removed it. "The burden of evidence lies with the editor who adds or restores material." (WP:VERIFY).
That said, I don't think the article should exist---the same page says "If no reliable, third-party sources can be found for an article topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it." 130.195.5.7 (talk) 05:20, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The EU should be removed from the list too, then, because it's not in itself an entire continent but rather it's a part of the continent of Eurasia. (NB: The reason Australia shouldn't be included on the list is beacuse Australia, rather than the Australian states, have sovereignty. France has foreign missions in/to Australia, but Victoria has no missions in/to France. That I think accords with the intuitive definition of why the EU is different from the Commonwealth of Australia. Still, for an Australian, the EU does have many similarities with a country, and maybe one day it should be dropped from the list; but that day isn't today.) —Felix the Cassowary 20:50, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Please point us to those third party citations OrangeCorner. I have lived in Australia for over 60 years. Never heard it referred to as a continental union. Lonelywurm above referred to "current usage". If there is any current usage that describes Australia as a continental union, it really must be cited. I hold pretty much the same thoughts on the other CUs mentioned, but claim less expertise on those areas. I really suspect that, as Zebulin suggested earlier, the total lack of relevant citations should surely lead to the whole article's deletion. HiLo48 (talk) 06:52, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Australia, Pt II 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Continental union. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090116092625/http://europa.eu:80/scadplus/glossary/commercial_policy_en.htm to http://europa.eu/scadplus/glossary/commercial_policy_en.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120415004713/http://www.africa-union.org/ to http://www.africa-union.org/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:06, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Continental union. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090503210549/http://www.africa-union.org/official_documents/Speeches_%26_Statements/HE_Thabo_Mbiki/Launch%20of%20the%20African%20Union%2C%209%20July%202002.htm to http://www.africa-union.org/official_documents/Speeches_%26_Statements/HE_Thabo_Mbiki/Launch%20of%20the%20African%20Union%2C%209%20July%202002.htm
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://europa.eu/scadplus/glossary/commercial_policy_en.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070813045214/http://www.consilium.eu.int/cms3_fo/showPage.asp?id=414&lang=en&mode=g to http://www.consilium.eu.int/cms3_fo/showPage.asp?id=414&lang=en&mode=g
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091005025403/http://www.comunidadandina.org/sudamerica.htm to http://www.comunidadandina.org/sudamerica.htm/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:08, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has left the European Union, and the map should reflect this.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by User.name.here (talk • contribs) 01:35, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Edited and uploaded a new version of the image. Not sure whether it would be better to include lighter coloring for former members, especially since South America has been almost entirely split. Also, the image caption says "2013", much outdated now. --Vipz (talk) 15:55, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

text: It seems that I cannot recolor South America's shapes like I can do for EU ones in the image for that matter. --Vipz (talk) 16:17, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brexit 

message: The Legend only has 3 description even though it has 5 colors on the map. Doremon764 (talk) 21:30, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding other Legend Colors