lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Intercropping

message: but I cannot figure out how to add interwiki link. Hopefully somebody will add it. 76.119.30.87 (talk) 22:42, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Russian interwiki article is [[ru:Уплотнённые посевы]] 

message: Can someone please put the way on how the chilli peppers and coffee are intercropped? I think this will help.AceLuan54 (talk) 06:20, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help 

message: In this article it says that the crops benefits from mutualism, but instead it lists cases of commensalism.
Mutualism is when both creatures benefit, like with some birds and hippos. The birds pick meat out of the teeth of the hippo. The bird gets fed, and the hippo gets their teeth cleaned. 
Commensalism is when one creature benefits but the other isn't affected. Like a plant using another as structural support. Plant A will get help standing up, but plant B wouldn't be affected. Keetocato (talk) 06:44, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarifying
Talk:Premier's Reading Challenge

message: Hi! I assume that if you've found this page, you were researching the Premier's Reading Challenge, looking at recent changes, recently created pages, or just typed the title in, and then wanted to know more about what I've done with the page. I'll just need to explain what I have done, and what I need to do.
The original revision of this page was the result of about 45 minutes of research and typing. There are a number of things that I would very much like to get done with this article. There are a few issues which I need help with, however. These should be in the above to-do list. If you could help with any of those, it would be absolutely fantastic. However, if you are a researcher looking for information on this subject, I'm afraid that I can't offer too much beyond what's already on the page. I'm confident that as this page is improved, more information will become available to you, but for now, what's there is there.
And, as a note to administrators, please leave a note on my talk page if this page becomes the subject of a deletion discussion, or a speedy deletion tag. I would very much like to defend it.
Thanks - James SugronoContributions 06:24, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Welcome!
Talk:Oliver LeBoutillier

message: Hello, all,
Arthur Roy Brown did not submit a combat report claiming victory over Richthofen; his original combat report, which reported the fight as "indecisive" was then altered. Until his dying day, Brown refused to comment on whether or not he felt he had shot down the Red Baron.
This article, as presently written, is incorrect.
Georgejdorner (talk) 21:39, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brown did not claim victory over Richthofen
Talk:Geoff Powis

message: Retired All-Star IHL/NHL hockey player - He deserves a page, please do not delete. He IS a person of importance. How does a computer determine a human beings level of importance?
*It just so happens that I'm not a computer.  Just using one.  :)  Seriously, this is written as a memorial which isn't allowed.  On the other hand, take a moment and look at some other article on other players to get a feeling of how an article should be formatted.  What this needs is (a) removal of the memorial and (b) verifiable sources as to this player's history.  I agree that he's likely a notable subject, but the article is going to need some sprucing up.  Good luck and have fun.  --PMDrive1061 06:46, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Do not delete
Wikipedia talk:Notability (fiction)/Archive 7

message: A simple request. In the examples section, some examples concern deleted articles. The reader of this guideline should be able to read them in their deleted form. Only in this way can the value of the example be employed fully. Show, don't tell. User:Krator (t c) 23:58, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undelete deleted examples in subpage of this page 

message: "This page is 190 kilobytes long." Should we not consider activating MiszaBot II on this page? G.A.S  06:29, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: MizaBot II is really easy to use, but I would like to see some consensus before I copy the code.  Any preferences regarding how the archives are setup?  The variables are here.  Ursasapien (talk) 07:33, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: How about the same as for WT:N? G.A.S  08:24, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I went ahead and set it up.  Someone can revert if necessary.  Ursasapien (talk) 08:38, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archive
Talk:The Dream (The Orb album)

message: Do we know where this was released? I can't find it on amazon or hmv. Technohead1980 16:56, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Released?
Talk:Timbaland production discography

message: *The original version of this article incorporated text from the Wikipedia article Timbaland discography. -- But|seriously|folks  07:10, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Attribution

message: This section was originally titled "Upcoming Releases/Speculation". Per WP:V and WP:OR, there should be no unsourced speculation in this article. I'm not an expert on the subject, so could the editors who've been contributing to this article please provide references from reliable sources that confirm the existence of all these supposedly upcoming songs? Thanks. --Kurt Shaped Box (talk) 20:07, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Upcoming Releases" 

message: I was thinking about slightly changing the layout here to look more like this, as it's a little easier to read, and not cluttered by chart positions (which are rather trivial in this particular context). --Blastmaster11 (talk) 21:39, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remodeling 

message: Is that really called Timbaland feat OneRepublic and not the other way around? What goes around comes around and to be quite honest, Zomby changed the Reark song "Natalia's Song" a Lot more.. Let me know, so I'll just erase it. Robert Hales had the original on the hit YouTube video. I might be wrong Sucker for All (talk) 18:46, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apologize?
Talk:Schubert (disambiguation)

message: I think that most people who know of a "Schubert" probably think of the composer, so I reversed the recent cut-n-paste move of this disambig page to "Schubert".  I could not find a relevant discussion.  There may be an argument for the move: if so, then please nominate it at WP:RFPM.  Whatever happens, please don't do cut-n-paste page moves.  Thanks.  --RobertG ♬ talk 07:10, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Francois Schubert (listed on this disambiguation page as another "Franz Schubert") was born in Dresden in 1808 and is known for only one composition called "The Bee". Does anyone else know anything else about this composer or this information, and, if so, is it enough to write an article about him? Classicalkid87 (talk) 16:09, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Franz Schubert 2
Talk:Maureen Walsh

message: ... Maureen Walsh, English singer (see here and there). --Kolya (talk) 12:58, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maureen Walsh is not to be confused with ... 

message: Change:
In 2019, she argued against the right of nurses to have uninterrupted lunches and rest breaks, claiming that nurses "...probably play cards for a considerable amount of the day." [8] The Washington State Nurses Association denounced her statements as "incredibly disrespectful and patronizing."[9]
To:
In 2019, she argued that a bill to ensure the right of nurses to have uninterrupted lunches and rest breaks should be amended to exclude critical access hospitals that serve less populated areas, claiming that nurses at that type of hospital "...probably play cards for a considerable amount of the day." [8] The Washington State Nurses Association denounced her statements as "incredibly disrespectful and patronizing."[9] 73.97.106.80 (talk) 17:53, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Edit completedFrapsity (talk) 19:12, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 20 April 2019 

message: I didn't know that Wikipedia accepts and publishes opinions now. They may be correct, but they have lost a ton of credibility here. ANVIL9267 (talk) 21:05, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I reverted the edit.  Thanks for reporting! S0091 (talk) 21:10, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

text: It's called vandalism. It happens. No, wiki has not lost "a ton of credibility" for allowing an insult to a very minor state politician to stand for a few minutes. Don't be ridiculous. 199.247.46.138 (talk) 04:08, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I think they were referring to the editor who made the edit as the article is semi-protected for this reason. However, don't forget WP:GF, just because someone got upset about a sensational topic and made an edit in the heat of emotion doesn't mean there a bad person or a bad editor. Frapsity (talk) 07:04, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Imbecile? 

message: Shame on wikipedia for describing this sitting senator as an imbecile. Whether she is or not is immaterial. This is supposed to be a neutral site to get non biased information. Not the opinion of any author. 184.90.45.100 (talk) 21:11, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see comments above.  The edit was reverted. S0091 (talk) 21:16, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 20 April 2019
Talk:Her Majesty's Theatre, Sydney

message: Question - It says the theatre was named "Her Majestys" in 1927.  Wouldn't it have been called "His Majestys" - or isit the protocol to call theatres female? CaptKpsja (talk) 15:34, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 
Talk:Hazel Treweek

message: A lot of this article looks a little too much like the obit, no? Anmccaff (talk) 16:56, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: There's a tool to help check it; documentation on how to deal with it is at WP:COPYVIO (specifically WP:DCV); and the big honkin' red flag you can send up is . --Xover (talk) 02:53, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, .  Shows a nice solid 74% likelihood, with vasty chunks of verbiage shared.  Anmccaff (talk) 15:39, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio/plagiarism
Talk:ETC Group (eco-justice)

message: "Biotechnology: A variety of techniques that involve the use and manipulation of living organisms to make commercial products. These techniques include cell culture, tissue culture, embryo transfer, and recombinant DNA technology (genetic engineering). ETC group focuses on the social and economic impacts of new biotechnologies. ETC group is not fundamentally opposed to genetic engineering, but we have profound concerns about the way it is being foisted upon the world. In the current social, economic and political context, genetic engineering is not safe, and involves unacceptable levels of risk to people and the environment. For ETC group, the fundamental issue is control."
"We"? Is this article copy-pasted from ETC, or written by ETC? Either way, it seems extensive review/rewriting is needed. At the least, could someone please put an appropriate banner on this article? (Something about NPOV?) I'm not familiar enough with Wikipedia to know which banner would be appropriate.  -Mysterius 07:34, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV?
Talk:Rome: Total War: Alexander

message: *The original version of this article incorporated text from the Wikipedia article Rome: Total War. -- But|seriously|folks  08:03, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Attribution

message: Shouldn't the article have more to do with how well the game sold etc, rather than acting more as a gameplay guide? 203.59.21.211 (talk) 12:18, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Game Information

message: Isnt this a downloadable game?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.211.218.179 (talk) 12:51, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  BUY? 

message: I suggest renaming the article to Rome: Total War - Alexander. That's how MobyGames lists it, at least. SharkD (talk) 08:42, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: More discussion has occured here. SharkD (talk) 01:43, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename article 
Talk:Island 35 Mastodon

message: I added both Tipton County, Tennessee and Mississippi County, Arkansas as categories. Might sound strage at first because the two counties are separated by the Mississippi River. Well, most but not all of it. Read the article about Reverie, Tennessee. Island 35 is politically part of Tipton County, due to earthqakes in 1811 and 1812 the Mississippi River changed course and the island is now on the Arkansas side of the river, though still part of Tipton County, Tennessee. It is one of these anomalies. doxTxob \ talk 23:28, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: County categories

message: Same as above. I am not sure if the categories are appropriate, after all. The site of the island 35 mastodon was damaged by souvenier hunters even before it could be properly excavated and preserved. Today it is destroyed. But still, it was a site where an excavation took place. doxTxob \ talk 23:37, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Archaeological site categories
Talk:2008 Malaysian Grand Prix

message: Nakajima is meant to be on a 10 place penalty. Does the qualifying result mean he will start at the back of the grid? Mjroots (talk) 08:27, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, Nakajima starts last. Andy4226uk (talk) 15:20, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Nakajima's Qualifying

message: I've dropped the page to mid importance (F1) (see here), to conform with the Belgian one. Apterygial (talk) 10:19, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Importance
Talk:Ricsige of Northumbria

message: "Halfdan Ragnarsson appears to have retaken southern Northumbria for the Danes, corresponding with the old Kingdom of Deira, or the Viking kingdom of Jórvík, between the Humber and the Tees."
I am no expert on Northumbria in this era, but the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle for 874 states that "Halfdan Ragnarsson... conquered the land... and took winter quarters on the River Tyne... and often raided among the Picts and Strathclyde Welsh."
The Tyne is not in Deira but Bernicia. These were distinct territories and the evidence is that Halfdan was significantly north of Deira; and the Tyne are would fit with him raiding the Picts and Strathclyde Welsh. 
I think this article is misleading and needs rewriting by someone who knows the era.
Dantes Warden 86.140.142.236 (talk) 14:54, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Halfdan and Deira
Template talk:Chamillionaire

message: Chamillionaire's not in the remix.. watch the remix's video here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g8TumWD63yU .  He's not in the song.  I'll delete him from the list for now, if anyone has more feel free to chime in. --Josh1billion 08:23, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Draped Up (remix)
Talk:List of KDE applications

message: How is Eric a KDE app? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.148.150.161  (talk • contribs) 
:Yes, there are a few other applications which do not actually appear to have any proper ties with the KDE project, including Arora and Rosegarden. --A Missing Semicolon (talk) 12:34, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eric 

message: I have removed from the list 4 programs which do not seem to have any more affiliation with KDE. 
* Rosegarden does not have any KDE dependencies except for one optional dependency which can be fulfilled by Okular or any other PDF viewer. It also has no reference to KDE on the website.
* Clementine is based on Amarok but no longer has any KDE dependencies. There is also no mention of KDE on their website.
* Ring (formerly SFLphone) is platform independent and also has no mention of KDE on their webiste.
* Arora is not only no longer maintained, it has no KDE dependencies and does not refer to KDE at any point. 
A Missing Semicolon (talk) 14:12, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-KDE software 

message: TaskJuggler 3.6.0 has been released on 2016-03-12. How is this discontinued?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.140.160.240 (talk) 10:47, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved back. Marquenterre (talk) 19:33, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discontinued software 

message: http://kdirstat.sourceforge.net/ specifies that it was a KDE 3 application and is superseded by QDirStat or K4DirStat
Here are links to those
K4DirStat: https://bitbucket.org/jeromerobert/k4dirstat/wiki/Home
QDirStat: https://github.com/shundhammer/qdirstat  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.109.54.239 (talk) 09:10, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  KDirStat has been dicontinued
Talk:Dead checking

message: An IP address put some flags on the article which are totally unjustified. Removed until someone gives a reason for them. Supersheep 13:42, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: All 4 References in this article are not available. Please consider to remove them. Thanks.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.182.209.17 (talk) 18:05, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  References Unavailable
Talk:Murus Romuli

message: The article is copied directly from "The Ruins and Excavations of Ancient Rome" by Rodolfo Lanciani; Houghton Mifflin, 1897 - the only online source is http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=97545903
The book is clearly out of copyright so this isn't a copyvio. But there may be database rights issues. The Questia site carries the following notice: "You are not permitted to copy any portion of our site for distribution to others other than in the normal course of your personal or academic research." andy 08:41, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The book "The Ruins and Excavations of Ancient Rome" by Rodolfo Lanciani is available in full as PDF from Google Books. Other sources there may also be relevant. I'm no Roman Scholar, but I'm not a bad editor. I'll take a look at what's here and see if I can't organize it to fit standards better. Narasinha (talk) 12:58, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

text: Beyond the fact that the physical book itself exists, if the material is out of copyright, the database claims are entirely irrelevant to repetition of its contents. They would be within their rights to consider an 'infringer' a persona non grata and cut off further access to their system but there wouldn't be a claim against having the public domain material up elsewhere. — LlywelynII 00:27, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Copied from public domain text

message: I've done some copy-editing on the article, cleaned up the intro paragraph, added sources, and wikified. I believe this should take care of the clean-up notices for the time being, so I'm removing all four from the article (Copyedit, Wikify, Unreferenced, context). Narasinha (talk) 04:36, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup done

message: The huge blockquote from Lanciani is interesting but highly misleading. There's more in Lanciani that should be added back into the article with citation, but his objections against Tacitus aren't well taken. Tacitus says the route included the Altar of Hercules and ran along the base of the Palatine to the Altar of Consus. That pointedly does not involve drawing a straight line between the two endpoints. It is, in fact, the exact opposite of that. Similarly, the route hugging the base of the Palatine means that it would've specifically avoided the conjectural marshes complained about. The cippi weren't set up at the time (a walltheoreticallywas) but at a much later date before being removed entirely before the time of Tacitus. We don't need to shoot all that down ourselves if no one has bothered to refute him about this in print yet, but we shouldn't just hang up his blockquote as if it's authoritative and complete. — LlywelynII 00:27, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: More cleanup needed
Talk:Ktiv hasar niqqud

message: So that we can get a better idea of the effect of the rules, could someone who knows Hebrew update the article to include either literal (vowelless) and complete (vowelful) transliterations, or Hebrew with niqqud and complete transliterations, or some other combination thereof? It would be appreciated! —Felix the Cassowary 14:27, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Something like this? Dan ☺ 19:00, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  That was what I had in mind, thanks. Sorry for the belated thanks. —Felix the Cassowary 13:46, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Your belated thanks inspired me... Dan ☺ 22:48, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Even niftier. —Felix the Cassowary 12:29, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transliterations/niqqud 

message: This is the correct spelling according to the Simple Transcription Rules of the Academy of the Hebrew Language. מושא עקיף (talk) 02:24, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ktiv H̱asar Nikkud
Talk:Daejeon Station

message: Using uppercase Station for this is the consensus per Talk:Seoul Station#Requested move 2 May 2020. Sawol (talk) 10:51, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Daejeon Station
Talk:Bad Medicine Lake

message: My family owns an island near the center on the larger side of the lake. This island has very old steps made from very large pieces of stone that were certainly not shaped by nature and that could not have been made anywhere near the recent past. My family had owned the island since the late 60's and there weren't many residents there and my grandfather & family designed and built the home. The steps come up one side and it's strongly believed by my family that these rock steps were used for rituals of some kind... Either Native American or possibly even Viking... But why would the tribes build ritual ground on a lake they're afraid of? It's just one mystery out of many about this lake. 172.221.70.102 (talk) 15:18, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Very old manmade stairs, carved from stone, too difficult big to simply transport.
Talk:Iksan station

message: Can anyone find some more information about the explosion, please?  I'm having a few problems working out exact meanings in the Korean Wikipedia article entitled 이리역 폭발 사고 and located here.  Thanks. JPBarrass 09:15, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explosion 
Talk:1998 ICC KnockOut Trophy

message: I'm not sure about the statement that this was the first tournament apart from World Cups to include all test-playing nations. The World Championship of Cricket staged in Australia in 1985 included all seven test-playing nations of the time. Not an ICC tournament, but should the statment in this article be removed? --Bcp67 (talk) 20:45, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not the first?
Talk:Sierra Club v. Morton

message: I get that the article is making reference to the notion of Pyrrhic victory with that phrase, but it seems unusually metaphorical for a wikipedia entry. But I don't know enough about wikipedia to know for sure. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.99.105.195 (talk) 03:09, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  ...won the war?
Talk:Eucalyptus radiata

message: The distribution and map needs editing, they are found further south than that, see here --Hypo Mix (talk) 00:37, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: It was way off the mark, so I have removed it.--Melburnian (talk) 05:33, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distribution 

message: Euclid mentions that:
There is also description in the Pictorial History of BVS of E. Australiana used in the commercial production of oil. It's likely that at some stage 
Euc. Australiana was renamed to E. radiata subsp. radiata, no record of the change is extant, unfortunately.--Lmstearn (talk) 09:24, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eucalyptus Australiana