Talk:Immortal Technique/Archive 2

message: The Silenced Revolution article exists, so this article really ought to link to it. I've put it back. Tim Ivorson 2006-06-30
Please stop removing it. If the The Silenced Revolution article should not exist, propose it for deletion. If it should not be listed under albums, move it elsewhere. Otherwise, it must remain where it is. Tim Ivorson 2006-07-03
In the absence of comments other than mine, I'll view wholesale removal of the bootlegs section as vandalism, unless The Silenced Revolution link is placed elsewhere in this article or until that article is deleted. Tim Ivorson 2006-07-07
yo that so-called bootleg is mp3 only available from peer to peer networks. since when is stuff like that part of an artists discography? i mean if it was a proper pressed cd boolteg sold on the street, ok... but thats a different story. --80.134.169.135 15:28, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: ''The Silenced Revolution''

message: text says 1978 but the box says 1979?
--80.134.182.178 20:30, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  year of birth? 

message: whoever changed the year: can you please cite your sources?
until then, i changed it back to "late 2006", as IT said 
in a recent radio interview. --80.134.130.199 20:19, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007? 

message: Who's sure his birthday is February 19?  On IMDB it says March 31, and it previously said the same here.--Tainted Drifter 04:13, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: yeah, but also, who's sure the year is '78 not '77 or '79? thats all the years i saw so far --80.134 16:39, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthday 

message: can someone rv the last 15 or so edits to a previous version?? I don't know how to Cavell 03:33, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Poor Quality and vandalism

message: After reading through the article, I noticed that it had quite a few spelling, grammatical, and formatting errors in addition to the neutrality disputes and unsourced statements already noted.  The introduction is also far too long and most of it should be deleted or moved elsewhere in the article.  I thus added a general cleanup tag to the article.  I may work on it myself if I have time, but it would be great if someone else could try and help as well. Rg998 16:37, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup Tag 

message: Hi. I see that 80.134 has removed a link to an interview with the article subject. It seemed like a good link to me. 80.134, could you tell me more about your reasoning? Thanks, William Pietri 00:09, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interview link 

message: Can we get some verifications on the prison charges? Was he really convicted of rape? Where can I get some information about that? Seems like something as big as that should be cited. Admiralakbar 04:36, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prison Charges 

message: HF, can some one please put the page back to the way it used to be?? I dont have Vandalbot. PPL please, this is an ENCYCLOPEDIA, not a coffee shop hen fest. Let's try to make this atricle sound like one.. Cavell 20:18, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism

message: In the Prison section of the article it used to say that he went to jail due to several cases of assault and rape and now it just says its assualt.  Why did someone take it off? did he not go to jail for rape and someone just made it up or did some fan of his take it off because it made him look very, very bad?. OR did he go back in time and not rape anyone anymore?
*Unless someone can provide a reliable source according to WP:RS, information like that is heresay. If a reference cannot be found to back up such a claim, then it will be removed. Cavell 05:06, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rape 

message: The CNN poll used as evidence that Immortal Technique's views on is specifically labelled "non-scientific" and is not the same as a professionally designed and supervised survey.  This is the disclaimer below the poll results when you click on the link:
This QuickVote is not scientific and reflects the opinions of only those Internet users who have chosen to participate. The results cannot be assumed to represent the opinions of Internet users in general, nor the public as a whole.
Unless someone has a more credible source, we need to remove the "mainstream" modifier from the sentence. --Tjss(Talk) 03:46, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  9/11 Views Mainstream?