Talk:Battle of the Burning Plains

message: Main thing article is not stable. Since created only today. -- tasc talkdeeds 21:14, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Reason for GA failure

message: Battle of Burning Plains → Battle of the Burning Plains. Rationale: correct title is "Battle of the Burning Plains"
===Survey===
*Support, as proposer « Amina . skywalker (¿Hábleme?) 15:43, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. —Nightstallion (?) 08:42, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: *Support, as proposer « Amina . skywalker (¿Hábleme?) 15:43, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. —Nightstallion (?) 08:42, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: The Good article nomination for  has failed
:It doesn't discuss the significance of this battle outside the fictional universe.  Worldtraveller 12:17, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  read WP:Lead the current opening paragraph is insufficient in content for a GA article Gnangarra 13:34, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:Good articles|Good Article]] [[Wikipedia:Good articles/Nominations|nomination]] has failed 

message: There should be something about how the end bit is coppied from Star Wars, I put a it that said that on but it appears to have been removed by someone who is unable to comprehend that Paolini (basicly) plagerised, that person should remember that it is not only their opinion that matters on wikipedia.
I DO NOT want to get in to an argument with fans, but there has to be something about it. Shadoom1 06:42, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, but Wikipedia only posts verifiable comment; this piece of information is only your opinion, and not actually verified. As you can see, most of the article is adapted from the book itself, so it is totally verifiable. For more info, please see WP:V.  --May the Force be with you!  Shreshth91($ |-| ŗ 3 $ |-| ţ |-|) 16:24, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

text: I've removed the speculation per wikipedia policy. Please do not re-add your "I am your father" content. --May the Force be with you!  Shreshth91($ |-| ŗ 3 $ |-| ţ |-|) 05:22, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alot like "I am your father" 

message: I don't beleive that this article is a deleteable article, as it describes a major and important incident in a major book. The concerns of original research are laughable; as you can see, it is so highly referenced, and there is no OR part. The whole content has its source from the book. And this incident is definitely well-written, comprehensive, and is near GA level, so there is no question of a bad article. If you feel it's not-notable, maybe you would think it's more important than a pokémon character.  --May the Force be with you!  Shreshth91($ |-| ŗ 3 $ |-| ţ |-|) 10:28, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prod concern 

message: Having not read the books (but with a curiosity prompted by the critics' slamming of the movie), I looked to this article for understanding of this universe.  My biggest question is WHO WON THIS BATTLE?  Though the article states that the arrival of Eragon's kinsmen and the dwarves disheartened the Imperial forces arrayed against them, the very last line--after the description of Eragon's defeat at the hands of the other rider--indicates that the Resistance was thoroughly routed.  Which one happened, and if they were routed, what turned the tide back against the Resistance?  Thanks.  208.58.73.181 19:26, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If you think armies do not just melt away read Battle of Marathon. The Athenians won an army 5 times their size because it melted away 193.48.189.201 15:03, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outcome of the battle 

message: Unless links to either sites or printed material writing criticism of the battle are given this section will be completely revamped so as to comply with the NO ORIGINAL RESEARCH rule Ikokki 16:31, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism