Talk:Archduke Wilhelm of Austria

message: Most of this article is hardly legible, it is written in English with a heavy German syntax.
Asaphx (talk) 06:37, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The grammar is still poor. It looks to me more as if orginally written by a Russian or Ukrainian speaker. I made some corrections but sometimes I may not have correctly deciphered the meaning of the original writer. [Note added later: I see the article was started by a Ukrainian editor. It's a great article, I think!] Richard Gill (talk) 07:51, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Language

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Archduke Wilhelm of Austria. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928092241/http://www.ucrania.com/article_read.asp?item=183 to http://spilka.webua.org/library/habsburg.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:35, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: An editor is attempting to remove sourced information without consensus: .  Information came from the work of a highly regarded historian and specialist in the field, Timothy D. Snyder.  Facts are confirmed by reviewers of this book, such as historian Brendan Simms, who in his review wrote " Who can resist a hero, Wilhelm von Habsburg, who "could handle a sabre, a pistol, a rudder, or a golf club" and who "handled women by necessity and men for pleasure": .   I'm not sure "give more viewpoints" means.  Are the facts correct or not?  That book is one of only two biographies written about the man - the other is from the 1950s and is not easily available.  Since the source is reliable we can assume the fact is correct.  As for the claim of WP:WEIGHT, it consists of 4 sentences in a fairly lengthy article.  
I note that this editor has previously attempted to remove information about a Ukrainian nationalist that can be perceived as negative (though objectively there is nothing actually negative about being gay).  Here he did the same thing: .Faustian (talk) 03:53, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The information is sourced, and Snyder's work is scholarly, not some sort of mere 'subjective opinion' (as suggested by the editor trying to remove it). The content is absolutely relevant to Wilhelm's biography as it speaks to his move to Paris, ongoing persecution and despondent state of mind, then final self-exile to Vienna. Removing salient content because someone doesn't like it is blatant censorship. If the editor in question finds it offensive it's their problem, not Wikipedia's. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 06:22, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

text: The British The Independent newspaper is own by the KGB officer Alexander Lebedev. It is a well known fact. The discreditation of the Ukrainian liberation movement is the main priority of the Muscovites. Aleksandr Grigoryev (talk) 18:44, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The Independent was a locomotive of the Russian propaganda under the British banner that criticized the 2014 events in Ukraine. Aleksandr Grigoryev (talk) 18:47, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of sourced information 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:07, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion