Talk:Inter-process communication

message: Why SOAP is in the list of 'platform specific APIs'?!
Samokhvalov 11:21, 04 Mar 2006 (GMT)
:I've moved SOAP and XML-RPC to the 'platform-independent' list, along with Internet Communications Engine. Perhaps more controversially, I've also put that list into chronological order. Cheers, CWC(talk) 14:44, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Platform-independent inplementations

message: The German version of this article seems much more well-written. How about replacing the English page with a translation of the German? 194.237.142.21 12:22, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Is there any way we can do it without obliterating too much of the content?  I kinda like having a list of IPC APIs and methods. Root4(one) 19:10, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  German version 

message: Who says that all OSs can Handle files? --92.198.37.119 (talk) 07:42, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Quite right.  While I cannot name examples, I expect there are systems that support threads but do not support files.  Interrupt-driven systems like the early Palm OS might qualify.  I have changed the reference from "all operating systems" to "most".  --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 10:29, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Files

message: Hmm, the article is very Unix-minded, I've just included link inmailbox article to here but it is not mentioned here, in vulgar terms the mailbox is a object of messaging mechanism. You create can create a mailbox and receive the messages from any processes, knowing its ID or in other cases have a pointer to it's contorol block, also when you try to receive a message you pass execution to other tasks. This kind of communication does not fit anywhere in any method described in here. While its implemented in uC/OS RTOS and Windows(message queue fits, but it's process-global). Gnomz007 01:39, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Mailbox

message: would it be possible to provide single sentence descriptions of these techniques? Saganatsu (talk) 14:35, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: These should be on the main table. Either that, or completely revamp the article with a heading for each major communication type, along with a link to the main article on that type. I think that would greatly improve this article. Compynerd255 (talk) 19:34, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  what are these techniques? 

message: One of the most important IPC mechanisms is not mentioned - Monitors (see Wikipedia page).
02:39, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: According to this article's heading, monitors are worth mentioning, since they coordinate multiple threads (but not multiple, memory-independent processes). However, monitors are very similar to mutexes as well as sephamores, so all three of those should be lumped together into the same category instead of mentioned individually. Compynerd255 (talk) 19:34, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Monitor (synchronization) 

message: IPC Shouldn't be mixed with Services, The web is based on a (client/server) design, of course there's a communication between the two, but you can't consider it a standardized general method for communication between processes, it has a specific target with a limited set of applications, Of course PHP developers would not agree as "MOST" of them don't know the security breaches they create constantly with their lazy code style and their lack of CS information, please don't mix both as most system designers would agree with me.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.41.228.245 (talk) 17:46, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  How would someone consider the web as an IPC Method? 

message: Is it important to include whether a particular method is supported by Windows 9x and/or NT based kernels and distinguish between the two?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.19.110.144 (talk) 13:56, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Approaches:  Distinguishing between Windows NT and earlier Windows systems 

message: Is it really useful here to list approaches have no description and no examples? If there are no examples, how do we know anyone is even using approach? GeneCallahan (talk) 13:26, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Table of Approaches 

message: JSON representation 2403:6200:8827:DE41:5DF:FEBB:4DAA:3680 (talk) 19:57, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inter-process_communication