Talk:EADS

message: EADS is not a consortium, while Airbus used to be one. A consortium is just an alliance of companies, EADS is a single company. David.Monniaux 23:54, 2 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Company, not consortium

message: In my attempt at improving the layout of the subdivision section, I tentatively outlined the Mil. Aircraft div. as consisting of Eurocopter and Dassault. Is this correct or not, and if not could someone more knowledgeable fix it? --Wernher 23:24, 15 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Military Aircraft division

message: Hey, thanks ≈1.0E06 to H1523702 for entering the two EADS airplane photos into the artice; IMO, they greatly improved it (made it much more visually appealing)! :-) --Wernher 23:54, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Great aircraft pictures!

message: Anonymous edit before mine rearranged the locations (and broke the layout slightly by eliminating a ).  Rearranged and added Spain to match the listing on EADS' site:
the road to the formation of EADS was paved with many partnerships and joint projects at Aerospatiale Matra, CASA and Dasa
European Aeronautic Defence and Space Company EADS N.V.
Le Carré · Beechavenue 130-132 · 1119 PR Schiphol Rijk · The Netherlands
EADS Deutschland GmbH · 81663 Munich · Germany
EADS France S.A.S. · 37, boulevard de Montmorency · 75781 Paris Cedex 16 · France
EADS CASA · Ava. de Aragón, 404, 28022 Madrid · Spain
From History of EADS: European Partnerships
-- JHunterJ 12:43, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Locations

message: This article says EADS holds 75% of Airbus, but Airbus says Airbus is jointly held by EADS (80%). --Abdull 18:14, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, even the main body text of this article says 80% too, which is correct. The 75% was my mistake when updating infobox. Nice catch. Mark83 18:35, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Airbus percentage 

message: One should perhaps get some external links documenting the 'arms dealing' criticisms of EADS -- the criticisms shouldn't just stand there as is.--Wernher 14:23, 28 Nov 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Criticisms should be documented

message: I have several pieces of coursework due at the moment so I dont have time to check, and/or cite all the statements here, but the article needs to be referenced properly. Aslapnatickle 13:32, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Inadequate Citing

message: I've seen the company referred to this on a number of sites. Is there any difference between it and EADS proper? Does it develop projects independenlty of EADS France or EADS Italia?  74.106.24.62 (talk) 07:22, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: EADS Deutschland?

message: Shouldn't ATR be listed as one?
:Yes it should and it is. Xionbox₪ 06:56, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subsidiaries 

message: An editor is very keen to add the word "dutch" to the opening phrase "The European Aeronautic Defence and Space Company N.V. (EADS) is a global pan-European aerospace and defence corporation" to turn it into "The European Aeronautic Defence and Space Company N.V. (EADS) is a global pan-European dutch aerospace and defence corporation". To me this doesn't seem appropriate. The article already says where the company is headquartered, and the section EADS#Financial_information doesn't seem to support describing it particularly as a Dutch company. I'm not going to revert him again at this stage, but the views of other editors would be welcome. - David Biddulph (talk) 11:19, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: EADS is not a dutch company, I think the name says that already. I fully support what you wrote. --Julian H. (talk) 17:47, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Describe as "dutch" in opening sentence?