lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Public Netbase

message: Hey, most of the references in this article are links to project pages of Public Netbase (world-information.org, netbase.org etc.)
I don't think that counts as secondary sources. I mean, I guess it's ok to link to descriptions of the projects, but this article needs way more additional sources. Interstellarpoliceman (talk) 12:12, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: Way too short. Not comprehensive enough. Need more detail. Lead should summarize the article, not be a recitation of facts. Refs are off to a good start.Rlevse 00:56, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Lede has been reformatted and some other tweaking.  Will see what further information is available to expand beyond current structure.  Serpent's Choice 06:32, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: GA tips

message: Rlevse appears to have left the project, so I'm going to be bold and pass this.  I feel it meets the Good Article criteria.  Although it's short, it's very well-cited and appears to cover a narrow topic in reasonable depth.  I suspect it's simply too short to become an FA, but for further improvement, I would recommend a copyedit to polish the prose.  If there are any other sources to be found, expansion would be welcome, but it's quite possible there's not much more to say that's encyclopedic.  Thanks for your hard work, and congratulations. Shimeru 07:26, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Good Article

message: This article shows how exciting and important Netbase was until the nasty government took away all its money.  It reads like an apologia from Netbase itself.  jnestorius(talk) 00:42, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have substantively reverted this to a previous version of the article.  While some of the removed material may be able to find its way back in, the general tone of the reverted edits had a noticeably non-neutral bias and sparse-to-no referencing.  I'd be happy to see a better, more comprehensive timeline of the events they were involved with - especially those with multi-national impact, but the article needs to guard its neutrality and ensure proper sourcing in order to accomplish that goal.  Serpent's Choice (talk) 03:53, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 
Talk:PhpWiki

message: I just deleted "PhpWiki is a fork of UseModWiki." diff PhpWiki was written from scratch in php, usemod was written from scratch in perl. Both developer communities worked together featurewise in the first years and established (together with MoinMoin) the defacto wiki standards, which didn't come from c2. --ReiniUrban 14:38, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Progressive Democratic Tribune

message: What is the relationship between al-Minbar and the Democratic Progressive Tribune - Bahrain? AndrewRT(Talk) 14:46, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: al-menbar is the Arabic word for "the tribune". —MK (talk) 22:44, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks understand now AndrewRT(Talk) 23:32, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Al-Minbar 
Talk:Chess Live

message: Dec. 3, 2006.  For the past 4 days, I can't access the Chess Live program or their web page.  What happened to them.  Did it close?—Preceding unsigned comment added by Donelsonj (talk • contribs) 
:I can't speak for their server but the website is fine. BlueValour 16:50, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Open or closed?

message: This page had a screenshot of v4.2 of the client but was deleted on June 3, 2010 because a fair use rationale was not provided. Since the server no longer exists, obtaining a new screenshot is pretty much impossible now. I think it would be beneficial for the article to have this screenshot but one needs to go through the undeletion process to first get it undeleted. If someone wishes to pursue this, view a revision of the page dated April 10, 2010 or earlier to see the file link. RedWolf (talk) 04:55, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleted screenshot
Talk:John Marshall (filmmaker)

message: See this.
Media anthro 14:58, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a balatant copyright violation from http://www.newenglandfilm.com/news/archives/05june/marshall.htm.  The page has been blanked and is now listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems. Moondyne 14:56, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Resolved. Given the extensiveness and repetitiveness of copyvios throughout the history back to its first creation, it has been replaced with a GFDL-vio free and copyvio free fresh start. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 01:57, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  the text of this article is all taken from another site
Talk:Driffield

message: Autochthony queries: is it possible to have a rough time-frame [e.g. 'late March' or 'mid-September' for this locally significant event?  Autochthony queriesd - 2216z 2011.01.25.  86.129.157.144 (talk) 22:15, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Only six years later but I've added this. It seems to be each August. Lineslarge (talk) 19:51, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Driffield Steam And Vintage Rally 

message: The article states The town is home to the country's largest one-day annual agricultural show,. Is "the country" the UK or England? (I'm thinking of the Great Yorkshire Show, which is England's largest agricultural show, but is outclassed in visitor numbers by both the Royal Highland Show and the Royal Welsh Show). Either way, the claim requires citation. 213.122.91.121 (talk) 22:37, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I've clarified and added citations. It's the UK. Also those other shows you mention are multi-day. Lineslarge (talk) 15:25, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Driffield Show - clarification 

message: I'm assuming the record temperatures are an average for a 24-hour period?? As I've been in Driffield in the middle of summer & it was considerably warmer than just over 22C? It must have been warmer this summer (2018)?, for the 'literal' figure?
: Above comments have mostly been addressed. I've annotated to show this. Lineslarge (talk) 16:40, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Climate

message: The section about Driffield beck confuses the Beck with the West Beck.  The beck runs through town parallel to the main street into the canal at river head, while the west beck runs (clue is in the name) to the west of town, then runs alongside the canal until they both reach the river hull.  West beck has fishing, the beck that goes through town has no fishing.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.190.121.248 (talk) 20:11, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beck / west beck confusion.
Talk:Finnish Rapid Deployment Force

message: The article says:
"The tests are relatively easy, consisting of only basic physical, intelligence, psychological and English tests, and are designed to weed out only the worst-suited applicants."
If over 50% of the applicants are not accepted every year. Does it mean that over a half of the applicants belong to the worst suited-category.
Cruiserweight 15:05, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article is quite outdated, needs to be updated with current information. I added a notice for it.
Amisderbi (talk) 18:09, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wildly outdated article
Talk:Katharine Susannah Prichard

message: The acknowledgement in the body of the article has been removed - it is not usual practice in articles - and the info is available from online sources anyway  SatuSuro 15:08, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Edits
Talk:Sulh

message: * "Classification of Lands in the Islamic Law and Its Technical Terms." A. N. Poliak. The American Journal of Semitic Languages and Literatures, Vol. 57, No. 1. (Jan., 1940), pp. 50-62.
* "Sulha Peacemaking and the Politics of Persuasion." Sharon Lang. Journal of Palestine Studies, Vol. 31, No. 3. (Spring, 2002), pp. 52-66.
I was searching JSTOR and I came upon them.  I don't know much about sulh so I can't say they are representative.  My previous exposure to the concept was in the form of "dar al-sulh".  The first article relates to that moreso.  The second talks about reconciliation after murder, specifically, and tells us that sulha is any specific instance of sulh.  I didn't read it all but it is a completely different meaning (it seems) but still one of relevance.  It also gives a more varied sense of the word "suhl" than just "truce"... since it's used as "peace making" and in the sense of that article (which is on an inter-personal level) it is not temporary (from what I gleaned).  This doesn't make the political dimension non-temporary (as Jeffery below briefly points out) but it is of interest in terms of what the word means.
* "The Political Importance of Islam." Arthur Jeffery. Journal of Near Eastern Studies, Vol. 1, No. 4. (Oct., 1942), pp. 383-395. 
This one equates dar al-sulh and dar ul-`ahd as the "world of allies".  They had to pay tribute.  It was temporarily and could be broken by the imam with "due notice" (p. 5).
Well, this was my attempt to educate myself a little about the subject.  If any of you have access to JSTOR or these journals through some other means I recommend maybe reading some of it and using them to write the article. gren グレン 15:10, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Articles
Talk:2007 Belgian federal election

message: I thought the date hadn't been set yet, are you sure that the elections will take place on June 24? --Ganchelkas 15:18, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Aye:  and . —Nightstallion (?) 17:06, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

text: Election had to be held before Tuesday 19 June 2007, otherwise alle elections would have been illegal an unconstitutional (Dobby-fc 15:43, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Election date

message: Marginal parties should not be dealt with, per WP:NPOV. There are many other parties that fielded candidates for the Senate (like Stijn, Resist, etc), equally marginal, equally deletable. I think it is best to concern ourselves here to parties which got elected, or which had already parliamentary representation. Intangible2.0 17:18, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  marginal parties 

message: It becomes increasingly clear that this is one of the more intense and long crises in the political history of Belgium. This crisis is also quite difficult to understand for most non-Belgians. Perhaps it deserves a separate article in which the formation can be discussed in more detail? Sijo Ripa 12:14, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, the government formation deserves a separate article. I'd suggest, analogous to the articles on Dutch cabinet formations: 2007 Belgian government formation as the title. It will be tricky to maintain NPOV on some issues though, as the media in both parts of the country sometimes have completely opposite views (Example: the Francophone newspapers blame Leterme for the crisis, whereas the Flemish newspapers blame Milquet).--Ganchelkas 13:30, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I created the separate article. Sijo Ripa 14:00, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Separate article for government formation?

message: A lot of the CNN articles were removed from the website; additional references are necessary.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fishbob (talk • contribs) 23:44, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Immigration and Checkpoints Authority

message: This sentence in the article is incomplete: "The Passengers Restriction Ordinance was introduced newcomers other than those born in Singapore or Malaya." Please help.--Vsion 00:12, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  incomplete sentence 

message: Awards and decorations of the Immigration and Checkpoints Authority doesn't seem independently notable of the authority, and can be merged in. Klbrain (talk) 17:40, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Template talk:'Allo 'Allo!

message: This navbox may be to wide on many displays. Note that the category box simply contains a list of categories separated by " | ", leaving it to the browser to make the categories flow to just use the number of lines needed, leaving pipe characters at the start or the end of a line in place. That would also be a better solution for this navbox. Shinobu 15:22, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Too wide
Talk:Doomsday prediction

message: I admit that I used Wikipedia:original research (my own experience) for the following sentence that I added
:"As of 2006 such prophecies turned out to be untrue." 
If anyone has a source for this then please add it. Thanks in advance Andries 15:26, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not worth keeping at all. I don't even remember any significant doomspday predictions about June 6. Fan-1967 15:33, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I admit that this article has no added value or negligible added value to Wikipedia in its present form. Andries 15:35, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe someday someone may produce a worthwhile article on the subject of such predictions. Can't see anything here worth salvaging. Fan-1967 21:01, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What about making this entry into a redirect to Last Judgement. The term doomsday disambiguates among others to that entry. Or redirect to doomsday? Andries 21:11, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Let's go with Doomsday and let the reader pick from there. Fan-1967 21:12, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Gregor and the Prophecy of Bane

message: This article has incredibly numerous issues with it; I can't even begin to describe it.  I don't have time to rewrite it now, so I'll just add the tag and hope that someone else does it until I get back.  Dealer Camel 21:11, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: General Page Disorder

message: This article needs some serious help. Here are the four biggest issues:
* References must be added, particularly in the "Reception" section.
* The reception section needs to be redone, as it is identical to the like-named section in Gregor the Overlander
* The plot summary needs to be expanded somewhat.
* A "see also" link or section should be added, especially with regards to characters (since there are no other wikilinks to List of The Underland Chronicles characters).
2ReinreB2 (talk) 03:10, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Four big issues 
Talk:Fruitbearing Society

message: When exactly was there a language academy in Britain? I never heard of it. --dunnhaupt 15:27, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Britain

message: Actually, this list is an English version of de:Liste der Mitglieder der Fruchtbringenden Gesellschaft. Could anyone look and correct it? Regards,Jeff5102 (talk) 12:13, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: An article that consist of mainly redlinks might be a nice challenge, but nobody seems to be up to that task. A list of redlinks is of little use to our readers; to them it's just a list of names, and since names don't change in translation, it does not need to be mirrored and maintained across languages. Most article linking here are actually linking to Fruitbearing Society, which indicates that a general article is much more needed. I therefore suggest to rename this article to "Fruitbearing Society", cut down the list to only those members that actually have (or really should have) articles, and refer to the full German list in a hatnote. — Sebastian 15:48, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

text: List pruned and page renamed. Also changed links to this page. There was, not surprisingly, not a single true link to the "list"; all were meant to point to the society. Moreover, the interwiki links did not link to the list, but also to this article. But I have to admit that the list is still quite long. I think we can leave out the flowery German names, since they are already in the German list, and provide arguably no value to an English speaker. (Some of them are hard to understand even for a German speaker such as me.) That will allow running the list in columns. — Sebastian 01:56, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

text: On second thought, maybe a category would be better than the list. Since this list is only sorted alphabetically anyway, that would provide the same information. — Sebastian 02:31, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  German article 

message: I'm baffled that this article uses an English translation of Fruchtbringende Gesellschaft as its title. No one who publishes on this area uses an English title rather than the original - at best an English translation sits as an explanation between parentheses. In fact it's not even clear that this is the correct translation (Fructifying Society is more accurate in my view). This article needs to be moved to Fruchtbringende Gesellschaft. --Pfold (talk) 10:20, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title
Talk:Elaninae

message: Since the family is has Falconiformes as the Order should the subfamily be consistent? JohnCastle 15:30, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

message: The lead says they are "hovering raptors", and "all are specialist rodent hunters"; but that might only be true of Elanus. The articles for the other species list different prey: bats (bat hawk), insects (scissor-tailed kite), reptiles (pearl and swallow-tailed kites). Also, the page for pearl kite says that it swoops on prey from a high branch, with no mention of hovering. 
I'll try to adjust the wording.  Any suggestions on how to give a generalized description that covers all the species? 
Pelagic (talk) 19:23, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hovering rodent hunters? 
Talk:Radio France Internationale

message: There are a lot of inaccuracies in this article, with unnamed sources or no sources at all, or simple hearsay, like the reference of president Guelleh's alledged phone call to remove an article from RFI's website
81.57.186.38 15:41, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Khooni Darwaza

message: The page on Khooni Darwaza says three princes were shot.  However, the articles of princes Mirza Abu Bakht, Mirza Mughal, Mirza Abu Bakr, and Mirza Khizr Sultan says each of them was shot.  That is four.  So, which is it, three or four princes?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.114.35.7 (talk) 20:34, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect 

message: Note:  Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 04:03, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Delhi Addition 
Talk:Gregor and the Marks of Secret

message: Why is this considered just a stub?  What sort of expansion does it need? It seems like a good summary to me. Saugart (talk) 18:01, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is considered a stub because the only section it has is a Plot Summary one. It need to be expanded so the article has more than one section. Prottos007 (talk) 02:32, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

message: 1. Get this page some references. The original books (listed on  Amazon here),  the wikia, Suzanne Coliin's website  here, and Scholastic's site  here are all excellent places to start. Secondary sources should come next, and will require slightly more work to find.
2. A "reception and awards" section should be added, much like the sections in Gregor the Overlander.
3. Overhaul the "plot" and "prophecy" sections. "Plot" needs to be shortened and generally cleaned; "Prophecy" could use a little formatting help.
4. A "see also" link/section could also stand to be added, especially to include List of The Underland Chronicles characters somewhere in the article. The same thing could be achieved with wikilinks within the article on character names.
2ReinreB2 (talk) 03:27, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Work to be done:
Talk:Gregor and the Curse of the Warmbloods

message: The first 10-15 lines of the plot seems to be copied right out the back of the book. Can someone rewrite it and make it actually sound like a plot summary instead of a paragraph copied from the back of the book?Prottos007 (talk) 02:22, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, I take back the part about the 10-15 lines. The whole plot summary seems to be comprised of MANY different parts from summaries from backs of different books...Prottos007 (talk) 02:28, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot Summary 

message: Step one: Get this article some references. At the very least, cite the original book,  Scholastic's page on the book, and  Suzanne Collins's page on the book.
Step two: Completely overhaul the "reception" section. At the time of writing, it consisted of one sentence of  original research.
Step three: Fix the "plot" section. Clean it up, shorten it slightly.
Step four: Add a "see also", especially in regards to List of The Underland Chronicles characters
2ReinreB2 (talk) 03:18, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Issues Resolved I went ahead and took care of these things and more, because I plan to nominate this article for Good article review. Check  here for a general summary of my edits and the   page history to see my exact changes. If you think GA review is a bad idea, please say so either here or on my talk page. I'll watch both. 2ReinreB2 (talk) 20:48, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Work to be done: 

message: As noted in the GA review, Goodreads is not a reliable source for reviews. It is also not reliable for information about editions. Both reviews and edition information are supplied by users without editorial oversight (WP:SPS). Edition information is even worse because it's cited by the article as a fact, not an opinion. Please source information about the editions to a reliable source (such as a library catalogue like WorldCat). – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 22:45, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Goodreads
Talk:Mühlheim am Main

message: I have worked on other articles that are stubs of cities or people that are not english or american. If people are willing to put in the effort to translate these pages. Even if these are crude translations done with free translator programs on the internet, people can do the manual labor and fix the grammar. If you have comments on this please post on my talk page as this pertains to many articles. Sometimesseespeople 17:06, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Machine translation
Talk:Mössingen

message: Translated from dewiki--Buchbibliothek (talk) 18:52, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Will be further revised the next days--Buchbibliothek (talk) 15:00, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The ref problem has been resolved by now. There was a surplus <ref> tag in the remainder of non-translated German text. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 11:48, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Coments

message: Inserting photographs is very simple, if you translate "Datei" to "File" and additionally "mini" to "thumb":
*German: 
*English: 
--NearEMPTiness (talk) 11:55, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photographs 

message: *Foto Oeschingen by David Buck
*Foto New town hall by Michael Fiegle
*Foto Bird protection center by Unreife Kirsche
*Foto Memorial plate by Furfur
Thanks a lot.--Buchbibliothek (talk) 18:41, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your efforts on collating this list. However, as far as I know, it is not required to list the photographers of pictures shown in Wikipedia articles, because their names are easily accessible by clicking onto the picture. NearEMPTiness (talk) 20:39, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fotos Copyright 
Talk:Münsingen, Germany

message: Translated from G. Wiki. Buchbibliothek (talk) 19:21, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

message: Since the grammatical construction appears to be more similar to German, I have modified it a little. I have not changed the "message" or deleted any part, I have only modified the language.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:D5:FF3B:F07D:F4A5:CEF0:9689:CF91 (talk) 09:09, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Style of language