Talk:DNA methylation

message: This page should have visual aids to make the attachment location of the methyl groups more easily understood 173.20.25.72 (talk) 15:30, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Visual aids  

message: * Action of DNA methylation in modulating gene activity can take place at remote sites in addition to or in preference to promoter-proximal locations.  Though one news article reports this as 'unexpected', it's not really considering the known role for remote enhancers, locus control regions and other regulatory islands. User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 02:59, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference for consideration 

message: This page has been tagged as being too technical for most readers to understand since November of 2008, but the present page has been greatly improved since then, so I am removing the tag. Guy Macon (talk) 03:26, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tag removed 

message: DNA methylation may regulate memory, but it doesn't encode memories directly. I've altered the language to fix this. The New Scientist article really shouldn't be cited here, as it's pop-sci and not a primary source. --aciel (talk) 03:16, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Memory 

message: An expert opinion on notability would be useful at :Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Illumina_Methylation_Assay -- Jheald (talk) 15:25, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  AfD: Illumina Methylation Assay 

message: I would like to see more on the story of the discovery that DNA methylation was possible and that it does happen. Zaphraud (talk) 04:57, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discovery 

message: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/07/130705102037.htm
In part: "Salk researchers previously discovered that in human embryonic stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells, a type of artificially derived stem cell, DNA methylation can also occur when G does not follow C, hence "non-CG methylation." Originally, they thought that this type of methylation disappeared when stem cells differentiate into specific tissue-types such as lung or fat cells. The current study finds this is not the case in the brain, where non-CG methylation appears after cells differentiate, usually during childhood and adolescence when the brain is maturing." -- Jo3sampl (talk) 12:03, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  For consideraton -- persistence of DNA methylation 

message: Substituted at 12:40, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on DNA methylation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110106183728/http://www.neb.com/nebecomm/tech_reference/restriction_enzymes/making_unmethylated_dna.asp to http://www.neb.com/nebecomm/tech_reference/restriction_enzymes/making_unmethylated_dna.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:21, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: It's been proposed that histones and DNA methylation cause:
* the homologous recombination during meiotic prophase I not to be random due to the remaining misshape of the DNA (statistics aren't neutral).
:: This shouldn't normally happen. We all know that. "Shouldn't normally happen" is a dialectic phrase. We need proof in the lab, we cannot simply imagine that all goes statistically well. We should test it on corn and microorganisms.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:2149:841A:3C00:E933:DA24:7618:BE11 (talk) 02:44, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Misshaped DNA remainder to have meiotic prophase I sectioning impact

message: The below sentence in the article, shouldn't it be "substitute A for G"?
I wish to mean A arrives and G departs, which is what I think happens.
So T:G becomes T:A
"This results in a T:G mismatch. Repair mechanisms then correct it back to the original C:G pair; alternatively, they may substitute G for A, turning the original C:G pair into a T:A pair, effectively changing a base and introducing a mutation"
Polypipe Wrangler (talk) 04:40, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  wrong substitution?

message: Concerning DNA methylation, there's an article that reports on axon regeneration and vision in mice based on Oct4, Sox2 and Klf4 genes (OSK)-induced reprogramming.() Would any of the experts here care to work that into the article in an appropriate place? Thank you --Chris Howard (talk) 22:05, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  article on OSK-induced reprogramming 

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage.) Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://nanoporetech.com/applications/investigations/epigenetics-and-methylation-analysis https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/03/140327142453.htm https://genome.cshlp.org/content/24/5/821. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 05:15, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed