Talk:Caviar

message: Why no mention of the second largest producer of caviar ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:E34:EFD2:6450:918D:6483:4AA5:B5BD (talk) 20:38, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: In Français, phrase "caviar au aumbergine" is used for unrelated puree made of cooked eggplants. 81.89.66.133 (talk) 16:32, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: what about France ?

message: It would have been nice if the article placed at least as much an importance to the scientific data regarding caviar as food 
as it did discussing its cultural/religious aspects! I came to Wikipedia to find this information but what a disappointment! 
What a shame on this so called encyclopedia - should be called a religiopedia!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.171.195.216 (talk) 01:36, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I did add a short paragraph on this, from my reading of the article I found, the ban is temporary right now, with the understanding that it will be permanent unless the countries involved come up with a good reply. If you can find a clearer source, or more news comes out, feel free to update it. Cheers, MartinRe 22:59, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Miscellaneous

message: The article claims that caviar is not vegetarian but since non-vegan vegetarian's eat eggs, and caviar is fish eggs then I would think caviar in and of itself would be non-vegan vegetarian objections by vegetarian based on cruelty to the fish objections related to the most popular means of harvesting the eggs. I think the reason why it's not considered vegetarian should be mentioned. --Cab88 
A new Vegan friendly caviar has arrived. It's called Vegan Caviar. It is made of seaweed and doesn't contain any animal or fish products. 
17:53, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Chickens aren't killed when their eggs are harvested, while sturgeons are.--66.32.233.224 12:06, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting.  Many who consider themselves vegetarians drink milk produced on a commerical scale.  Such milk is only possible through continual breeding for beef (or even veal) production. Dainamo 15:00, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Making the best of a bad situation, I suppose. A lot of people who don't approve of unmarried sex still enjoy nonsimulated porn. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.122.208.51 (talk) 14:36, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

text: ‌Being a Persian native speaker does not qualify you to comment on the word caviar. Khaay, from which comes Khaayeh, which I assume you know it as a native speaker, is a Persian word for egg and the root for the word caviar.  aliparsa (talk) 23:05, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Caviar  and vegetarianism

message: I changed "southern California" to "California".  I live in CA state and most of our sturgeon farms is in Northern CA and not Southern CA.  Stolt Sea Farm's sturgeon operation is by Sacramento .  White Sturgeon is also native here in CA, known as the Pacific sturgeon, Sacramento sturgeon, & California white sturgeon.  --  Adeptitus 17:32, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Caviar production in California

message: The article states:
The word "caviar" derives from the Persian word خاگ‌آور (Khāg-āvar), meaning "the roe-generator".
However, I've seen other sources, including Merriam-Webster Online , trace the origin to the Turkish word havyar.  It may be that havyar has a Farsi antecedent, or perhaps not.
The article refers to khag-avar, which it translates as "roe-generator"; but this source  also mentions the word chav-jar, which it translates to "cake of power" (ancient Persians used to eat it in stick form as a kind of elixir).
I am going to update the article to reflect these possible etymologies.  Maybe someone more knowledgable about Farsi, Turkish and eastern languages can weigh in.
guanubian 19:48, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Etymology of the word "caviar"

message: I still lack to catch the exact diference between caviar and roe. Is the point in its color (black vs. other), cooking/salting or something else? --Koryakov Yuri 22:51, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Caviar vs. Roe

message: The article states: "During the Prohibition, caviar were smuggled in special cases shaped to fit in boots to aid the smuggling."  I cannot find any mention of Caviar being banned during prohibition. I think that statement needs a citation. chavo 14:16, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Odd Statement RE: Prohibition

message: Why is caviar so expensive?
reply: numerous reasons
1. difficulty and quantity of harvesting, you only get a very small amount of it per fish. you get far more poundage of meat. the ratio is something like a few ounces of roe for potential caviar out of a 100 pounds of fish
2. only half the fish harvested have the potential for roe (it can only come from the female)
3. they have to be quite old to produce enough quality roe to be useful (10-20 year old females)
4. they cannot be fertalized or about ready to spawn (eggs deteriorate into unusable texture during mating)
5. not all species of fish have roe that tastes good enough to eat, many of the more common fish harvested for eating, are not used for caviar. or even more widespread is that they are simply harvested too young to produce edible roe.
6. there is actually a very wide range of prices. when people talk about the expensive ones ($100 and up per ounce) they often don't bother to mention that there are some which sell for $5 an ounce
7. they kill the fish to harvest the roe, which means they eventually deplete the number of 10-20 year old females available even if the fish being harvested isnt on the endangered species list
8. caviar is often considered an elitist delicacy, even though in past centurys it wasnt that big a deal. but what you find is that if you tell a rich person something is going extinct, they often want to eat it. some of the most expensive caviars are simply because some rich guy wants to eat the last of a species when there is almost none of that specific type of fish left on the planet
9. there isn't even that much demand for low price caviar; give an average person caviar and you'll find many people don't even like it. which is why you don't see large scale farming operations trying to maximize cultivation, they would rather harvest the rarist almost extinct fish and sell it to the stupid rich people who think paying $100 an ounce for something that tastes like salty snot makes them special  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.128.110.225 (talk) 21:32, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Relax... What this article consists of is a depiction of the fact that caviar IS considered, and this is sourced, the "ultimate roe" (and prices demonstrate that social construction), as well as, for many public authorities in the world, caviar is a name that can only be apllied fo sturgeon roe, and not to others as salmon or trout. The Ogre (talk) 14:00, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: And yes, the artcile does need some work and some trimmings, I don't have the time right now, but I'll get back to it. The Ogre (talk) 14:05, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Cost

message: On the radio (NPR?) it said that caviar from 1800's American fishing grounds was so cheap and plentiful that it was served for free in coastal bars like peanuts are today. Can anyone verify this statement? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Septagram (talk • contribs) 03:13, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Caviar in 1800's America

message: Hello people! This article urgently needs a good image of proper Caviar (that is Caspian Sturgeon Roe)! The Ogre 10:24, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done! The Ogre 16:13, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: Do we really need 5 pictures of caviar on one page? The page isn't even that large, it looks very overpowering. I'm sure one or 2 images is all that is needed.Ray harris1989 13:46, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Images

message: I thought it was interesting that the author of this article chose to group all Islamic Hallal (Halal) regulations in a single line "In Islam all sea or river animals such as fish are lawful and halal." This is obviously not the case and it should be noted that Muslims of the Shi'ite sect (not all) have guidelines that prevent them from eating fish that do not have scales. It should be noted that in iran, the roe is considered a type of egg product and that the fish itself is seldomely eaten due to Islamic restrictions.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shadowpoet (talk • contribs) 21:46, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I could not agree more.  I'm seeing this type of thing throughout WP with respect to Halal "regulations", Kosher "laws", etc.  Their application is FAR too broad, and obviously not true without exception.  Religious and or cultural dietary restrictions are far too complex to reduce to a single broad statement.  If the subject is going to be introduced, at least qualify it for accuracy. It would be better to leave it out all-together, IMHO. 73.6.96.168 (talk) 18:09, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Caviar in Islam

message: I recently heard that caviar is produced in an inhumane way. The article seems to support this idea, saying the fish are clubbed (stunned) and then the ovaries are "extracted". The article doesn't mention how the extraction takes place or how eviscerated fish is treated. I was told that they are simply tossed back to die, and, I guess, economically that might make sense. Anyone have details? — gogobera (talk) 22:50, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: production details

message: This article tells me everything I want to know about caviar -- except what it tastes like. --Captain Infinity (talk) 20:35, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Important info missing

message: There is no mention of not using metal spoons (other than gold) with caviar as it "imparts an off flavor" and if metal damages the flavor why is caviar sold in tins?  --Weetoddid (talk) 02:42, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: the tins receive a special treatement in order not no affect the roe. The Ogre (talk) 14:01, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Metal

message: Watchers of this page may be interested of a requested move on Talk:Black Caviar (horse)#Requested move, requesting that Black Caviar (horse) be moved to Black Caviar, which is currently a redirect to this article. Feel free to express your opinion at the requested move if you wish. Cheers, Jenks24 (talk) 02:56, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  May be of interest 

message: There are many google results of snail caviar. I think this is worth mentioning. Komitsuki (talk) 12:06, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Snail caviar? 

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests August 2011 
;What should I do?
	A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 13:20, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Egg sandwich.jpg Nominated for Deletion

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests October 2011 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 12:10, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Iranian caviar.jpg Nominated for Deletion

message: This assertion is made with no details or backup "So many of the fish were harvested for the caviar that by 1906, a ban was placed on commercial sturgeon fishing." It begs basic questions such as a ban where? Placed by whom?" Randal Oulton (talk) 13:08, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: 1906 Ban

message: Are these eggs that have already been sprayed by the male. I.e., would caviar grow into fish or are these eggs just containing the female contribution?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR)  08:28, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you're asking about insemination with male sperm.  Correct?  They're not "sprayed" with paint.  lol   I just think it's strange to avoid direct terms in order to make a statement more "palatable" - if you'll pardon the pun.  73.6.96.168 (talk) 18:13, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pre or post inseminated 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.blackstargourmet.com/The-History-of-Caviar_c_293.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Voceditenore (talk) 11:45, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: *Note This involved the removal of the entire "History" section. Please feel free to write a new one in your own words and using reliable sources with inline citations. Voceditenore (talk) 11:45, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: The Suppliers section contains a bit on Uruguayan-produced caviar that seems very much like an advertisement or, at least, the unreferenced words of a proud citizen.
Uruguay produces Black River caviar, some of the finest Acipenser Gueldenstaedtii (Russian/Iranian Ossetra) currently on the market.[citation needed] The production process is organic and 100% sustainable. The sturgeon is raised in 8,000 hectares of river delta, allowing the fish to live as conditions in the wild. This particular river delta is the best choice outside the Caspian Sea to raise Caspian Sturgeon.[citation needed]  Bth-root (talk) 11:02, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  UruguayCaviar 

message: Cyberbot II has detected links on Caviar which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: local or global
If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locally or globally.
When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags.
Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
*https://www.beverlyhillscaviar.com/suggestions.php
*:Triggered by \bbeverlyhillscaviar\.com\b on the local blacklist
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:24, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blacklisted Links Found on [[Caviar]] 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Caviar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20140323105807/http://caviarbase.com/caviar-production/ to http://caviarbase.com/caviar-production/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:51, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Says there are "four" varieties but then lists seven?  SquashEngineer (talk) 04:47, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Varieties 

message: "The American caviar industry got started when Henry Schacht, a German immigrant, opened a business catching sturgeon on the Delaware River. He treated his caviar with German salt and exported a great deal of it to Europe. At around the same time, sturgeon was fished from the Columbia River on the west coast, also supplying caviar. American caviar was so plentiful that it was given away at bars for the same reason modern bars give away peanuts - to make patrons thirsty.[12] "
the above paragraph is really missing the DATE/YEAR when the described events took place and the conditions descrbed existed. it is a widespread problem in wiki articles that you get a piece of story with no time references whatsoever. i know just whinning about it does not help, but i dont know what else to do. perhaps it would be useful to have a specific tag like the citation needed that could be used to mark the missing time reference needed points.
176.63.176.112 (talk) 13:21, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I take issue with the first 6 words.  I've been out of school for a while, but I'm fairly certain that the term "got started" is not proper English.  And "The American caviar industry ..." seems far too broad and unreliable.  The entire paragraph seems suspicious.  Just my .02 73.6.96.168 (talk) 18:18, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  section: varieties 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Caviar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to https://www.caviarhouse-prunier.com/index/index/loc/25/lan/1/International/en/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111017181755/http://www.marzetti.com/products/romanoff/product.php?bc=25&cid=18 to http://www.marzetti.com/products/romanoff/product.php?bc=25&cid=18
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110306142314/http://www.newzy.net/2011/02/15/russians-caviar-in-europe/ to http://www.newzy.net/2011/02/15/russians-caviar-in-europe/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140323165256/http://www.ifis.org/resources/features/sustainable-caviar-production-save-our-sturgeon%21 to http://www.ifis.org/resources/features/sustainable-caviar-production-save-our-sturgeon%21/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140304044433/http://www.awi.de/index.php?id=5946&type=123&filename=awi.pdf to http://www.awi.de/index.php?id=5946&type=123&filename=awi.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060529095608/http://www.cfbf.com/agalert/AgAlertStory.cfm?ID=408&ck=0D0FD7C6E093F7B804FA0150B875B868 to http://www.cfbf.com/agalert/AgAlertStory.cfm?ID=408&ck=0D0FD7C6E093F7B804FA0150B875B868
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130202231718/http://www.caviarkelp.com/the-process/ to http://www.caviarkelp.com/the-process/
*Added  tag to http://oukosher.org/index.php/common/article/kelp_caviar_receives_ou_kosher_certification/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:18, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Caviar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060214041052/http://cites.org/eng/res/12/12-07R13.shtml to http://www.cites.org/eng/res/12/12-07R13.shtml
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100903145655/http://presstv.com/detail.aspx?id=136154§ionid=351020102 to http://www.presstv.com/detail.aspx?id=136154§ionid=351020102
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:17, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Caviar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://www.christmaswhistler.web44.net/smithHistory/SmithBrosWhitefishCaviar.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121002151223/http://russian.lingualift.com/blog/russian-caviar-roe/ to http://russian.lingualift.com/blog/russian-caviar-roe/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:33, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Why is there literally zero information on the history of caviar? This is a terrible article for lacking it. I actually did a search and for some bizarre reason the Wiki articles on caviar all obsess about where it's made and who is responsible for making most but absolutely no historical information. 108.170.143.83 (talk) 18:31, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It is indeed a lapse! Lapses like this get fixed when someone like you or me decides to write a history section into the Caviar article. Got any interesting sources? --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇  20:41, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is there is no History section? 

message: Sentences in this section seem incomplete grammatically and are hard to read.
"In recent years Transnistria took a place in caviar producers list since there was built and put into operation modern sturgeon complex."
 "Design capacity of a fish-breeding zone is equal to 50-80 tons of commodity fish and 5 tons of caviar a year." SquashEngineer (talk) 12:36, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Industry 

message: Caviar apparently has 42 thousand calories in every tablespoon? That doesn't sound right.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.132.173.37 (talk) 01:03, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a matter of understandable confusion, thanks for the question. Unfortunately, Calories (capital C, what you're used to in nutrition, sometimes called large calories) are identical to kcal, which does equal one thousand calories (small calories, an energy amount in physics). Moreover, people aren't generally careful about capitalizing Calorie, and so in practical scenarios, kcal and either calorie or Calorie are usually synonymous. 2603:7000:AE3E:24A2:A822:EB4A:F7AF:FB9A (talk) 15:33, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  42 kcal 

message: Why is there no section on Iranian Caviar? Russia and Iran have historically been responsible for most of caviar production. 
Their Almas caviar is the most expensive in the world
I have found very good references. 
Anybody want to help?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robert.smith.syd (talk • contribs) 21:36, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Iranian Caviar