lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Electric-field integral equation

message: Someone should really correct this article - its factual content and the way it's written. First of all, there is virtually no introduction - what's the article about? I couldn't really figure out - the equations in the first paragraph are certainly not general Maxwell's equations of an electrodynamical field. Probably they are equations for a harmonic E-M wave, but it should be explicitly stated! Otherwise the reader may find it confusing to see things like "rot E = H" (!) etc. The notation is also unclear. The rest of article should be rewritten, because it's technical and and the same time vague.
--MichalKotowski (talk) 17:08, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: This article definitely needs to be corrected

message: I removed a remark saying that the EFIE is a Fredholm integral equation of the first kind "because" the current appears only under the integral. This is a, rather common, misunderstanding. Integral operators in the classical Fredholm theory are compact operators. The distinction between first kind and second kind Fredholm integral equations makes sense only if this restriction on the operators is respected. If the only criterion would be that the unknown "appears under the integral," a simple transformation of the Green function (adding a shifted Dirac distribution) would allow one to transform a first kind equation into a second kind equation and vice versa. In general, the singularity of the Green function determines whether the operator built on it is compact or not. Bas Michielsen (talk) 10:30, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fredholm integral equation ? 

message: I'm a PhD student who works in this area (computational electromagnetics), and I spent the whole summer working through the electric field integral equation. The derivation done here is very different from that in much of the literature. I would like to do a serious overhaul of this derivation, and to provide a lot of context to it with example problems, if the community would appreciate it. Any thoughts?
Thanks.
Brimacki (talk) 02:34, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I would say, go ahead and make this article in something correct and readable. Thanks in advance. Bas Michielsen (talk) 07:22, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heavy revision possible? 

message: I came across this page and immediately wanted to edit it.  After reading the talk comments it appears that someone has picked up the task but the most recent date is 9/2014.  Based on the comments related to this article it seems like an EFIE specific page should at least reference a more general treatment that includes the MFIE and CFIE to address the resonance issue for closed surfaces.  EFIE is sufficient for an open surface so this page stands alone but it definitely should be improved.  Drdrbergman (talk) 15:03, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Status
Talk:Kartia: The Word of Fate

message: I was searching for 'Rebus' the japanese title which comes up with nothing this needs to be taken into account.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.150.103.101 (talk) 15:00, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Rebus
Talk:Structural equation modeling

message: SEM-Net is a large and longstanding email listserv of people who are interested in Structural Equation Modeling. A group of them, led by Leslie Hayduk, put together a set of suggestions for content for the article. They do not have a lot of experience editing Wikipedia, so they gathered the material and emailed it to me to ask for help converting it to Wiki Markup. I am nearly done with this in my Sandbox, and I will start moving content over to here (Talk page) or to the main article. Suggestions or help moving content both welcome!
Prof. Eric A. Youngstrom (talk) 18:36, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestions from the Membership of the SEM-Net listserv 

message: Hey , I don't think that directing folks to the software implementations of the method counts as a link directory 
WP:LINKSTOAVOID. 
>Researchers using SEM employ software programs (such as Mplus, lavaan (in R), LISREL, OpenMx, SPSS AMOS, Stata)
Would you be ok if we changed the external links to bluelinks?
> Researchers using SEM employ software programs (such as Mplus, lavaan (in R_(programming_language)), LISREL, OpenMx, SPSS AMOS, Stata)
I think that way we wouldn't lose the important information about software without feeling like we're advertising, which I think is your concern
Mason (talk) 12:29, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Making a list of external links to software is exactly a link directory, and exactly the sort of thing we shouldn't be doing. I also don't agree that lists of examples should be present. I don't feel this is 'important information' since Wikipedia isn't supposed to be a site that recommends particular software to users. - MrOllie (talk) 12:35, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, ok. I can see where you're coming from. Let me think about it because as someone who teaches SEM, these are pretty much "all" the major software implementations that researchers use. I've found that folks are much more receptive to applying techniques if they're already familiar with the software. Mason (talk) 12:45, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

text:  Looks like we both missed the section on software, lol. Structural_equation_modeling#SEM-specific_software. I'll putt the missing information there.Mason (talk) 12:58, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Software 

message: E.g. cyclic dependencies are allowed. Could you add more, including literature on it? Biggerj1 (talk) 21:08, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discuss Differences to Bayesian Networks
Talk:Freeverse Inc.

message: Freeverse Software is a leading developer of entertainment software, specializing in Mac games. Based in New York City, Freeverse titles have received numerous awards including a MacWorld Game Hall of Fame, two MWSF Best of Shows and three Apple Design Awards in 2004. Its original characters have appeared in TimeDigital, Wired, and Animation World magazines, as well as in national television commercials for Blockbuster Video.
:I'm going to move this into the main article.--Kryptknight 17:43, July 22, 2005 (UTC)
::As of April, 2005, Arcane Arena ceased to exist. arena.freeverse.com is no longer a running server. Adding that information to the article. GofG 03:21, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Portal talk:Russia/DYK

message: *...that Emperor Nicholas II of Russia was billed 3,250 rubles for the Rosebud egg, the first Fabergé egg he presented to his empress consort Alexandra Fyodorovna? 
* ...that the phrase of Soviet sniper Roza Shanina "I will return after the battle" would be paraphrased in a book title?  
* ...that Vostochny is the largest eastern port of Russia. The port has year round navigation and has a deep water port, suitable for handling large tonnage ships?
* ...that after Peter the Great's reform of the Russian military, serf recruits, and their children born after the recruitment, were liberated, with the boys being sent to specially created Garrison schools? 
* ... that the predecessor to the Imperial Russian Navy first sailed during the Second Azov campaign of 1696 under Peter the Great?
* ... that the Soviet Red Army's T-10 heavy tank was originally named IS-10 for Iosif Stalin (Joseph Stalin), but renamed in the climate of de-Stalinization, after Stalin's death in 1953?
* ... the fictional spy Stirlitz was brought up in Gorokhovets "near the Volga River" according to the Soviet TV series Seventeen Instants of Spring? Plans have been discussed to erect a monument to him in downtown Gorokhovets?
* ... that Nikolai Bugaev, father of Andrei Bely was the founder the Moscow Mathematical Society? Through Bugaev's star student, Dmitri Egorov, many famous Russian mathematicians, such as Andrei Kolmogorov and Nikolai Luzin, directly "descend" from Bugaev-- and thus from the Prince of Mathematicians, Carl Friedrich Gauss? 
* ... that Josef Gusikov invented a xylophone made from wood and straw and became a European sensation playing it in the 1830s? 
* ...that Kirill Eskov named a genus from the Linyphiidae spider family discovered by him in 1988 after Marsh Kikimora, a female spirit in Slavic mythology.
----
Putting above stuff here until I get a chance to reformat with an automated/randomized version.  Cirt (talk) 08:49, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Older version of DYK list 

message: *Portal:Russia/Did You Know Articles (Check against WP:Recent additions). Cirt (talk) 05:44, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archived hooks from prior manual version 

message: *April 23, 2006: Microdistrict
*January 9, 2007: Tsiolkovsky State Museum of the History of Cosmonautics
*January 10, 2007: Kira Kirillovna of Russia
*April 12, 2007: All Saints' Church, Daresbury
*April 25, 2007: Encyclopedia of Domestic Animation
*April 28, 2007: The Bronze Horseman
*June 2, 2007: ASNOVA
;Note
These were previously listed at WP:RUSSIA, will check against WP:Recent additions and the main list and add into rotation here. Cirt (talk) 22:03, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  To add to list 

message: Here are some other hooks, will have to check against WP:Recent additions to see if these historically actually appeared at T:DYK, and then add them into rotation. Cirt (talk) 08:18, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Some others
Talk:Perodua Myvi

message: :This article was nominated for deletion on June 10, 2005; the consensus was to keep. For discussion, please see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Perodua MyVi.
----
Why should it be deleted? This is a major breakthrough for Perodua. It's a key car for them and this deserves a special article on it compared with other previous mediocore models. --Haniff 06:40, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: i believe the savvy and the myvi cannot directly be compared to one another, even though they were launched almost at the same time. the myvi is a supermini, and the savvy is a compact car. The savvy should compete with the likes of the perodua kelisa, instead. but i guess it's a matter of how you see it
so do you think myvi should compete with Getz? --Haniff 09:02, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: err no, i like it despite knowing nothing of the "Toyota" whatever POS. in fact i dislike "Toyota" >:P but their marketing and product sense is definitely impressive compare to SOME other car makers. imo, P2 is doing well with it because they targeted the market with a product they want: good prices yet provides acceptable quality and support. it is not they are good, just no one else is doing it better. Akinkhoo (talk) 16:01, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  myvi and savvy different class altogether 

message: The Perodua Myvi (M800) will be rebadged as a Toyota Passo in 2023. Derwydd74 (talk) 10:01, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Perodua Myvi (M800)
Talk:Giovanni Ambrogio Figino

message: See also :Image:Gerolamo Figino.jpg. Lupo 06:43, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tetraquark

message: I notice that dibaryon is about a hexaquark particle of the same kind of configuration as a baryon doubled... and not about a two-baryon composite particle. dimeson would seem to be the equivalent term form this 4-quark particle of the same kind of configuration as a meson doubled... but "dimeson" seems to be about composite particles composed of two mesons? Seems like inconsistent terminology? -- 65.94.77.36 (talk) 23:23, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: "dimeson"?

message: According to X(3872) article, one tetraquark configuration is the diquark-antidiquark configuration, but statements about Z(4430) seem to say it is a doubled-up meson? -- 65.94.77.36 (talk) 00:36, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Rename the article to bimeson please. Hcobb (talk) 02:31, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: [[diquark]]-antidiquark

message: Not making the edit as I am by no means an expert on this subject, but in July 2021 CERN reported the discovery of the Tcc+, which contains cc. I think this means that the sentence in "History and discoveries" that reads "The existence and stability of tetraquark states with the qq (or QQ) have been discussed by theoretical physicists for a long time, however these are yet to be reported by experiments" should either be removed or updated, right? Tpth (talk) 03:35, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: {{overline|q}}{{overline|q}}QQ discovery confirmed?

message: CERN announced discovery of "first-ever pair of tetraquarks" here. Should it be added to the article? ElfDecker (talk) 08:07, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discoveries on July 5th 2022
Talk:Karameh

message: This is now a copyvio from . Can it be both on WP:VFD and WP:CP? Rasmus (talk) 07:13, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This has now been fixed by User:BD2412. (talk) 14:06, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio

message: This article has been kept following this VFD debate. Sjakkalle (Check!) 10:38, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  VFD debate 

message: I have removed a sizable chunk of material that was copied directly from this source, without attribution or indication of permission. bd2412 T 05:44, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio material removed 

message: Removed copyvio material from this website posted to this talk page without attribution or indication of permission. I shall explain - The law of the U.S. (and most countries) gives an author ownership of his work. Wikipedia users can not post such an author's work anywhere - not in an article, nor in a talk page - without permission (unless it is just a small snippet, like a quote, which would be a "fair use"). If we were to do so, the author would have the right to sue the person who violated his copyright by posting the material, and in the U.S. could seek statutory damages of up to $150,000, so obviously it is very important to us to keep our users from holding themselves out to be sued, and to keep Wikipedia from getting drawn into such litigation. You are welcome to summarize the work of another author in your own words, and to quote sentences from another author, so long as you indicate that it is a quote and identify the source. bd2412 T 14:33, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: More copyvio material

message: ENOUGH SAID...2 WEBSITES DOES NOT A SOURCE MAKERabrams20 22:19, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  TRY USING SOURCES 

message: There has been a lot of text deleted since I last edited this article in the summer, but I can't find any reasons for this deletion here or in the edit history. Anyone able to explain?
Lapsed Pacifist (talk) 04:33, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Material relating to the Battle of Karameh was moved to that article, as explained in an edit summary. -- Nudve (talk) 07:03, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Missed that, sorry. Lapsed Pacifist (talk) 23:23, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Text deletion
Talk:Suzanne La Follette

message: I see this says she was a conservative journalist, although according to this site, she was a libertarian feminist.  Which was it?
Allixpeeke
La Follette was never a conservative, always a libertarian. See Presley article at http://alf.org/papers/LaFollette.shtml
The appropriate citations have been added to article. 
Emmaspooner (talk) 02:27, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conservative of Libertarian? 
Talk:Caspar Wistar (physician)

message: This makes absolutely no sense - the article says he was born in 1761 but his parents in 1764 and 1765? - Quirk 07:22, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: The article states that Wistar served as a chairman for "the Society for the Abolition of Slavery".  I don't find this organisation in the wp.  However, I do find "the Pennsylvania Society for the Abolition of Slavery", alias the Pennsylvania Abolition Society.  Is this what the article should refer to? JoergenB (talk) 20:49, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, link now corrected. --DThomsen8 (talk) 01:05, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which abolitionist society? 
Talk:Jake Baker

message: Hello, sorry that I left this so incomplete - I'm tired. Perhaps more interested parties would like to help clean it up? I'll be on later to do more work. Conradrock 07:32, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'll be back 

message: Jake Baker is non-notable outside of this case. The article was therefore merged to United States v. Baker on October 12, 2007, per WP:BLP1E. A "Mergeto" tag had been on the article for the prior two months with no objections raised. Iamcuriousblue 17:13, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merged to [[United States v. Baker]]
Talk:Amen.

message: The French wikipedia says it was filmed in 2001
IMDB says it's 2002
the realisator's page says it's 2003.
WTF ?
Ok, let's take the average ^-^ Flammifer 07:34, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date 

message: Amen is a Greek word, not a Hebrew.--205.215.119.4 (talk) 12:49, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Check your sources 

message: The article should maybe consider providing relevant criticism of the film's historical value, especially since it has apparently created a cultural phenomenon of people uncritically taking the movie at face value, without ever really questioning whether Pius XII may really have been a Darth Vaderish accomplice to the entire Nazi regime and its crimes against humanity. It doesn't really help when you have several modern historians such as John Cornwell, Saul Friedlander and Michael Phayer who are willing to paint an excessively bleak picture of the late pontiff in order to advance their own personal agendas of imposing changes on the modern Roman Catholic Church. Much of this negative historiography has alrwady been critcized by other historical writers in books like The Myth of Hitler's Pope by rabbi David G. Dalin. ADM (talk) 17:51, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical value 

message: I added information about the plot, I dont think it needs to be requesting expansion anymore--Pace2Pace (talk) 03:56, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion
Talk:Louella Parsons

message: This needs a photo, some instances of scandals she discoved or famously reported on, and the article needs to flow more. --Alexs letterbox 07:44, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Work needed

message: In the listing under 'Spouses', you say 'Henry W. Martin (1926-1964; his death)'. But in the main article, you say 'They remained married until Martin's death on June 24, 1951.' Valetude (talk) 17:28, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  3rd husband 

message: I included this line in my redraft of the lede, as I think it's important to define the particular quality behind the notability: 'Parsons possessed an uncanny gift for sensing scandal, and her dramatic scoops could make or break an actor's career.'
Why has this been deleted? Valetude (talk) 21:25, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Defining characteristic 

message: from the article: 'her columns were read by 20 million people in 400 newspapers worldwide'. 
However, juxtapose this from the article: 'her Los Angeles Examiner column came to appear in over six hundred newspapers the world over, with a readership of more than twenty-million'. 
Can we make up our minds, here? I mean, is it '400 newspapers', or is it 'over six hundred newspapers'?
I might suggest that even 400 is probably an exaggeration.DanLanglois (talk) 06:41, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  how many newspapers!? 

message: There's an error here. I can't find a 2001 version of Leaming on Worldcat, and the quoted isbn is for David Nasdaw's biography of Hearst. KJP1 (talk) 11:35, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cite 18
Talk:Glyphosate

message: I propose merging Glyphosate-based herbicides into Glyphosate. The two pages have a total overlap and maintaining both is extremely challenging. Glyphosate Herbicides are the main use of Glyphosate so a sub-section there would suffice plus merging most of the rest. We also have Roundup (herbicide) that can accomodate some specific content on that specific product (although it should probably be merged as well as Roundup=Main Glyphosate-based herbicide=Glyphosate in a bottle).    talk 14:24, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: * Merge – see reasoning above    talk 14:33, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

text: *Would make more sense to merge Roundup with Glyphosate-based herbicides. Glyphosate per se is just a chemical, and the article shouldn't be contaminated with all the branded herbicide noise. Bon courage (talk) 14:46, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

text: *:Glyphosate is a chemical that was invented by a company for specific use as an herbicide. It is not a "just a chemical". This article can't avoid covering that fact. We have some pages that drill down into the details of what I assume you are referring to as "noise" such as Monsanto legal cases and Roundup (herbicide) that should be linked from this article.    talk 17:39, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

text: I agree with Bon Courage that if a merge was going to happen, this article should remain as-is and to instead merge Roundup (herbicide) → . Roundup is just one of many brands now with all the generics out there and being off-patent for around 30 years, and the owners of that brand aren't even the dominant producers of glyphosate anymore. Ironically, the more generalized title Glyphosate-based herbicides that is being proposed to be merged here would have more staying power and feasibility to navigate what was discussed at the RfC than Roundup (herbicide). KoA (talk) 16:15, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Glyphosate-based herbicides]]

message: Stauffer Chemical patented the agent as a chemical chelator - 
the source listed does not support that claim  see also https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6132386/ 156.146.156.168 (talk) 19:16, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for catching that mistake. I made this edit, to correct it: . --Tryptofish (talk) 21:15, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccurate sentence
Talk:Innate behaviour

message: If "behaviour" redirects to "behavior," shouldn't "Innate behaviour" redirect to "Innate behavior" and not the other way around?  Not to mention the fact that the article uses the American spelling throughout. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Chachob (talk • contribs) 00:46, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Alive at last 18:30, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect spelling
Talk:Mel Brooks

message: This may seem like an odd request, but where can I find a list of voice acting roles Mel Brooks did? I already know a few, such as Bigweld from Robots, Wiley the Sheep from Jakers!, and Grandpa Mel from Special Agent Oso, but I want to know his full voice acting discography so 1: I can see if he was in anything else because I think I heard him in other projects but don't know for sure, and 2: so I can include them on this page. If that's not too much to ask. If it is, don't bother. I mean that. Triviatronic9000 (talk) 03:28, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: See the list article Mel Brooks on screen and stage, and note the roles marked as "voice". Dimadick (talk) 11:09, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you kindly, friend. Triviatronic9000 (talk) 21:37, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Voice Acting Roles 

message: Someone as famous and prolific as Mel Brooks should have a filmography on his Wikipedia page.
I was going to add it myself, but every time I edit/add to a Wikipedia page, it gets undone by admins. Dwilliamsiddall (talk) 17:50, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: You will find it on Mel Brooks on screen and stage, which the page links too.CRBoyer 18:19, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I just spent several minutes looking for it. The link could be displayed more prominently in the article, rather than buried under "Acting credits and accolades." Given that Mel Brooks is well known as a filmmaker, his filmography is incredibly well hidden. 81.105.46.48 (talk) 19:08, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

text: Did you look under Acting Credits and Accolades?CRBoyer 19:40, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, that is perfectly clear from my comment, and the point stands. 81.105.46.48 (talk) 09:00, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  There is No Filmography on this page