lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Diego García-Sayán

message: This article needs to be translated and cleaned up, but the subject is most certainly notable. He's a judge with the Inter-American Court of Human Rights and a Chair of a U.N. Committee.Res05e (talk) 20:20, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I would suggest that you write a shorter article according to Wikipedia style in Spanish and upload it into the Spanish Wikipedia at :es:Diego García Sayán. Then it can be translated into English.  Andreas  (T) 20:57, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't speak Spanish. I'm cleaning up the English language version of the article.Res05e (talk) 21:11, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, my mistake.  Andreas  (T) 21:23, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

text: I'm going to translate it. --  Ketchup Krew   Heinz 57! 21:00, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of youth councils

message: Facts from Finland: 
-about 200 active youth councils
-about 60% municipalities have youth council
more info:
http://www.emory.fi/fi/lisamateriaalit/liitetiedostot/nuorisovaltuusto_englanniksi.pdf  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Teemuxs (talk • contribs) 17:06, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Youth councils in Finland
Wikipedia talk:Aircraft encyclopedia topics/2

message: Is the second aircraft designed by Eric Clutton refer Clutton-Tabenor FRED the Easy Too appears to have been a design only and none were built -  MilborneOne (talk) 20:28, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Concur - both the Jane's encyclopedia (p. 256) and JAWA 1977-78 report it as "under construction" (p. 507), but I can't find any later references to it. Maybe best to incorporate it into an article on Mr Clutton himself. --Rlandmann (talk) 01:05, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Bill Gunston reports it as having flown in 1983 () - I'll see what else I can find out. --Rlandmann (talk) 01:13, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Clutton-Tabenor Easy Too
Talk:Les Sylphides

message: The photo is for La Sylphide not Les Sylphides please take that photo out they are two different works.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.12.195.65 (talk) 01:13, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not a photo, and it doesn't claim to represent anything from Les Sylphides. It illustrates a section of the article which refers to La Sylphide. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 06:47, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Still it was the wrong ballet. I've replaced this with a more pertinent illustration of Anna Pavlova in Les Sylphides. Alfietucker (talk) 09:13, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Costume

message: The statement in the article that the Britten score was thought lost needs to be queried. He'd made the arrangement for the American Ballet Theatre when in New York at the start of the war so as to earn some money for living expenses. It was then recorded by the Ballet Theatre Orchestra under Joseph Levine on 13 October 1952 at the Riverside Plaza Hotel, New York, for Capitol Records. They issued it on LP (Catalogue No. P8193) and it was later issued in the UK on Music for Pleasure (MFP 2017) so quite why Britten's version was "thought lost" is not clear. The 'Grand Valse Brillante' from the score can be heard on You Tube ...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XpXsDE-4uNg
Other orchestrations also include an arrangement jointly made in the 1940s by the Boston Pops 'house arrangers' Leroy Anderson and Peter Bodge. It was recorded in 1946 by that orchestra under conductor Arthur Fiedler, initially on 78s and reissued later on LP (RCA LM-1919 & RD-27077). Four excerpts from this version were also recorded by Leopold Stokowski for an LP entitled 'The Heart of the Ballet' in 1950 (RCA LRM-7022 / HMV ALP 1133 / Cala CACD0547). Sir Malcolm Sargent conducted his own orchestration of 'Les Sylphides' at Covent Garden in 1962 and simultaneously recorded it with the Royal Opera House Orchestra for HMV's 'Concert Classics' label (SXLP 20049).
Philipson55 (talk) 10:17, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Britten orchestration
Talk:Alta Loma Middle School (South San Francisco)

message: If this article needs to be merged into one large article about South San Francisco's middle schools, please suggest whether or not it should be done.
Also, please provide some example articles.
*Please see WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. We do not need a discussion to redirect schools. If you check out the category you will see that several thousand redirects bear witnes to this procedure. Please remember to sign your posts. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:38, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consensus needed
Talk:Propagule

message: Propagule and Diaspore have distinct meanings with diaspore emphasizing the natural mechanisms for dispersion of descendant organisms in the wild while propagule is a technical term used in Pathology and Horticulture, among others.  These distinctions are best conveyed with the existing two articles. Bob (talk) 05:56, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing Article Merge Proposal 

message: The first paragraph of the article first implies generally that this might apply to any/all organisms, but then later mentions only plants, bacteria and fungi.  
* If the term only applies to those three types of organism, it should be made clearer / more explicit.  
* If, on the other hand, the term can be applied to (some) mammals, birds, insects, worms, protozoa, etc., then the list should be expanded, or at least clarified to make it obvious that the current listing of three types of organism is not exhaustive!  
Given that the second paragraph add mentions of viruses and protists, it seems that the initial list of three types isn't exhaustive, so I'll make a small provisional change.
—DIV (1.145.114.10 (talk) 01:48, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Organisms"
Talk:Imagination (magazine)

message: Hi User:Mike Christie, about the last note: "...Tuck and Nicholls both list Palmer rather than Mahaffey." Which source?--Jarodalien (talk) 16:20, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi -- Tuck is listed in the sources; Nicholls refers to the Encyclopedia of SF, the 1979 edition of which is listed in the sources. Mike Christie (talk - contribs -  library) 16:34, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: What's I mean is, which page, and this should be clarify inside that note.--Jarodalien (talk) 00:24, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right, it should.  I added the page number for the Nicholls, which was actually to Brian Stableford's article in the 1993 Clute/Nicholls encyclopedia when I checked.  My copy of Tuck is in a box at the moment and I can't get to it so I can't fix that one at the moment. Mike Christie (talk - contribs -  library) 13:17, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for go though all this trouble.--Jarodalien (talk) 14:20, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  need clarify
Talk:List of tall ships

message: Madeline and Manitou are properly in the list.  They are both berthed at Traverse City, Michigan.  However, the internal links take you to the wrong articles.  These need articles that relate to the ships, and disambiguation.  Welcome in Traverse City, Michigan also has the wrong article.  7&6=thirteen (talk) 13:16, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Internal links for [[Madeline]], [[Manitou]] and [[Welcome]]

message: Wikipedia is by defintion pedantic, so I should note that not all these ships are sailing, but just floating in dock.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.97.239.147 (talk) 23:17, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Some are in a drydock, not floating at all.--DThomsen8 (talk) 06:17, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: sailing today
Talk:Boris Barnet

message: There's no consensus in our community on bio boxes, especially the ones which contain no additional info and simply clutter the page. --Ghirla-трёп- 17:26, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you link to the no consensus debate?  I'm restoring it per WP:IBT.  Feel free to discuss this at the WP:ACTOR or WP:FILM talkpages. Lugnuts (talk) 17:36, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Here's what the community thinks about them. Many if not most established wikipedians are unhappy about the clutter. Anyway, WP:IBT instructs us to follow it except "where common sense and the occasional exception will improve an article". I don't see how the repetition of the text in a separate box placed in a corner of the page improves the page. Please explain your intentions. --Ghirla-трёп- 17:43, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: "The community" reads as one guy trying to push some agenda from 2.5 years ago!  If you feel strongly about them, maybe you could relist the template at TfD...? Lugnuts (talk) 17:49, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  42 people is not exactly "one guy". Each time the template was listed for deletion opinions were split pretty much down the middle. I can see no consensus for pushing it into every article by hook or by crook. --Ghirla-трёп- 20:52, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bio box
Talk:Holy Cross Church, Woodchurch

message: Can we have a list of C20-C21 rectors from the boards at the back of the church?
Basil Turvey
Raymond Wilkinson
...Tostevin
to date 20:52, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Rectors
Talk:Aakhri Daao

message: The film is officially a Hindi language production. Do refer the censor board certificate that appears before the opening credits.103.5.133.9 (talk) 00:49, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: See Talk:Salim-Javed. Maestro2016 (talk) 22:03, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Language
Talk:Richard McGowan

message: This article was marked for speedy deletion by an editor who questioned the importance of McGowan.  
C'mon, he's documented as the first American to set foot on Everest, and has multiple first ascents!  In the mountaineering world, and in the adventure travel industry, he is exceptionally well known. He deserves inclusion.
There seem to be editors who should be marked for speedy deletion.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jack-z (talk • contribs) 01:31, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Pharmacy school

message: Pharmacy school sounds somewhat unencyclopedic. I would suggest Pharmacy training to be a better title. If there is consensus, I will move the article in a couple of weeks. dramatic (talk) 21:32, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The names "Pharamacy School" and "College of Pharmacy" are UNIVERSALLY used in English-speaking countries, and the equivalent is used in French Canada. You have nothing to argue about.
"Pharmacy school" is what it's called. Trying to make it sound fancier or more "academic" serves no purpose. 68.52.132.34 (talk) 06:17, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Article title

message: Information on pharmacy education in Mexico is completely missing here. That is very pertinent because many Americans and Canadians go to Mexico to buy their medications. "Canadians?", you ask? Some Canadians go to Mexico for fishing trips, etc., and they go shopping while they are there. I met some in Tijuana. Americans shop for medicine a lot in places like Laredo, Ciudad Juarez, Nogales, Mexicali, and Tijuana. It would be nice to know what education is required in Mexico.
However, I do know that many, many medications can be bought in Mexico without a prescription.98.81.14.72 (talk) 22:51, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pharmacy schools in Mexico 

message: The article does not seem to be about a school or about schools in general. The subject seems to be about the qualifications required to be a pharmacist.
The article should be renamed to something like  — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 17:51, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong article title?
Talk:GamesRadar+

message: Are there anymore editors? Because in all honestly, most I know off the bat is from the podcasts and regular articles so I'm probably missing someone important. EDIT: Also keep a lookout for vandalism from fanboys. Stabby Joe (talk) 14:16, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  More editors? 

message: Can we request protection for this article? The vandalizing has increased literally moments after I greatly expanded to article. More to break seems to be the "logic" for some. Stabby Joe (talk) 16:06, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: This article is about a NN website and it relies almost entirely on primary sources.--180.172.239.231 (talk) 06:33, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  AFD 
Talk:Westfield (village), New York

message: I propose that the earlier form of the article name—Westfield (village), New York—be restored.  This will bring this article's title into line with those of all other New York villages.  An administrator's assistance is required, as a simple move over redirect was not possible. --Ken Gallager (talk) 14:46, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Support, although it's a pity the two can't be merged. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 20:58, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name change
Talk:Boobyalla

message: As a town, this should probably be titled Boobyalla, Tasmania per WikiProject Australian places but since it is a ghost town, I thought it best to seek consensus. -- Mattinbgn\talk 22:18, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Now moved. -- Mattinbgn\talk 06:47, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:Lardon Chase, the Holies and Lough Down

message: Hello! During late June, July and some of August, I'm working on a paid project sponsored by the National Trust to review and enhance coverage of NT sites. You can find the project edits here, as well as a statement and contact details for the National Trust. I am leaving this message when I make a first edit to a page; please do get in touch if you have any concerns. Lajmmoore (talk) 20:32, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  National Trust pilot
Talk:Cerulenin

message: If a person relying on rice for their diet consumes 2000 kilocalories = 550 grams of rice, and if all of the grains are infected with Sarocladia oryzae with 2.2 micrograms cerulenin per gram, and if all of the orally consumed cerulenin enters the bloodstream (very doubtful), then 1.2 milligrams of cerulenin are consumed, which even for someone only 50kg in weight is only 0.024 mg/kg, versus 30 mg/kg listed for the mice.  Wikipedia policy prohibits independent conclusion that the compound in rice has no effect on people or grazing animals, and in reality until you do the experiment you can never really know, but I thought this calculation might help editors who are tempted to speculate along this line. Mike Serfas (talk) 22:13, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Back of the envelope calculation

message: The structure for this compound is available here:
http://www.chemspider.com/Chemical-Structure.4445281.html --ChemSpiderMan (talk) 03:53, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Added, thank you. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 15:48, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  STructure is absent 
Talk:Windsor Great Park

message: Under Geography in reference to the River Bourne it is stated that "It runs through a number of ponds, particularly to the south. Chief amongst these are Great Meadow Pond and Obelisk Pond". A brief look at the map will show that it cannot run through both. They lie on different streams although it is not clear which is the Bourne. treesmill (talk) 12:15, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The River Bourne 
Talk:Windsor Safari Park

message: An anon editor removed the fact that Themes International plc also owned The American Adventure Theme Park.
I have been trying to confirm or disprove this. Unfortunately, Google-land is swamped by mirrors of this page, and nothing concrete was found to support the assertion. On the other hand, I did find LinkedIn entries for two senior people who worked at The American Adventure (under Granada) and then worked at WSP under Themes International. (see Marc W. Etches (especially) and Neil Protheroe) Just thought it worth mentioning in passing. -- EdJogg (talk) 12:49, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Themes International 

message: 'Windsor Safari Park was, however, proactive in dolphin research and conservation, employing a great many dolphin experts and academics.' Really? This sounds like SeaWorld PR rather than a true reflection of what actually happened at WSP.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.106.95.180 (talk) 08:56, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed it as being uncited and lacking WP:RS Plutonium27 (talk) 08:53, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Research' - puffery?
Talk:Miacis

message: This article about the extinct mammal, Miacis, has some major deficiencies that reduce its credibility; example: "genus of species", and a much too chaotic discussion of its contribution to carnivora.  As a college student in pursuit of a degree in the sciences I would appreciate it if this article could be edited into a credible account on the species.
Richard B
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.161.13.117 (talk • contribs) 23:28, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Although nobody ever answered this, I take it these deficiencies were addressed long ago? --Doric Loon (talk) 09:06, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Deficiencies

message: What species is depicted, ? Could it be what is now Gustafsonia? FunkMonk (talk) 18:47, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't have any species in mind, as I based it off of a reconstruction I saw in After The Dinosaurs by Donald Prothero.  I can go back and make a more specific reconstruction and identification for both Miacis and Gustafsonia.--Mr Fink (talk) 20:39, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Could be nice! Because it also seems one of the other species was moved to a new genus, Angelarctocyon. FunkMonk (talk) 20:42, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restoration? 

message: I've added a new section to deal with the myriad species assigned to this waste basket taxon. The table was based on a section in the corresponding article] from the Catalan Wikipedia. I've extend the table to include more species and added a column to give current status and additional information (e.g. assignment to new genera). I'm working on a cladogram to show the polyphyletic and paraphyletic nature of this genus. Jts1882 (talk) 14:06, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taxonomy section
Talk:Charles L. Whitfield

message: This article is supposed to show the history of Whitman along with how he progressed to become this famous scientist, and it is not. It must go into greater detail about how he became a scientist and his background history. This should be more of a bibliography and less like someone slapped on a couple of random facts. --A
nnmohh (talk) 23:20, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improvements 

message: I edited this article by spelling out numbers when needed and fixing a minor spelling error.--Jessicaloyd27 (talk) 22:10, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revisions 

message: The information you added was informative.  Maybe talk a little more into depth about each book or article.  Other than that, good job! --KellyPaige=Baller (talk) 14:16, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  psych 101 critic 

message: As you have said in your preivous statement, this article should be more about Whitman's history and how he became a reknown scientist. Although you're added sentence about his publications, which was well written I must say, you probably should include more about his background. Not only may it be interesting, it would help the reader understand maybe why Whitman decided to go into this field. --DieHardMcClain (talk) 15:23, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some Proper Advice 

message: This article as written is absolutely horrible. It reads like a self-promotion ("See his newest books below" in the lead? Seriously?), and indeed certain editors seem to have more interest in expanding the lists of books and external links than in actually discussing any of Whitfield's minority views on (for example) the validity of "recovered" memories. He was an important figure during the "Satanic panic" of the 1980s, as well (promoting the completely discredited idea that Satanic ritual abuse was a real and widespread phenomenon). In fact, were it not for the Satanic Panic, he'd be completely non-noteworthy.
My preference would be nominate this article for removal, but barring this course there must be some balance. As it stands one might believe nothing this man has ever written has been disputed in the least, when in fact (on recovered memories at least), his views have been rejected by a sound majority of professionals in that field. Were I in a less charitable mood, I'd call him a shameless woo-peddler. Wilford Nusser (talk) 13:09, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Self-Promotion / Not Notable?
Talk:Battle of Goito

message: Hi I was re-editing based on Embree, Michael's  Radetzky's Marches: The Campaigns of 1848 and 1849 in Upper Italy. Everything is fine except the Cite error: The named reference "ME" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). Could you help me fix it? Thank you. 2604:3D09:D07F:E580:A438:7495:7C5B:2C33 (talk) 13:31, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help need
Template talk:Brahmic

message: IMO this template is too large. Perhaps it makes more sense to add the family tree to Brahmic family, and replace this with a smaller, horizontal navigational box (or perhaps just leave it at the 'writing systems' navigational box.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Joost (talk • contribs) 12:35, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Template too large

message: Oriya language or script is a descendant of Brahmi script but not a descendant of Proto-Bengali script, please see the following categorization which says that Kalinga script is the precursor of modern Oriya script.  ସୁଭ ପା/Subhashish Panigrahi 16:21, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Please correct the tree

message: Three new Brahmic scripts were added with Unicode 11.0:
* Dogra (Unicode block)
* Gunjala Gondi (Unicode block)
* Makasar (Unicode block)
They should probably be added to this template but I'm not completely sure where in the tree they go.  Does anyone know?  Thanks. DRMcCreedy (talk) 04:08, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Unicode 11
Talk:Beath High School

message: Although the fifedirect link refers to the school as being non-denominative, this is not the correct term. From Wiktionary the definition of denominative is:
#deriving from a noun , or from an adjective
#being a name
Clearly non-denominational is intended. On reflection though, the link I inserted to non-denominational is not appropriate here as it refers specifically to non-denominational Christian churches. I will change the link to Religious denomination to indicate simply that it is not denominational, rather than imply wrongly it is linked to a non-denominational church. Mutt Lunker (talk) 23:03, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: non-denominative/non-denominational etc.
Talk:Stonehaven

message: Is he notable enough? Akerbeltz (talk) 21:46, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Ian Hardy

message: In his autobiography "Random Records" the early 19th century playwright talks about visiting the maritime town of "Stonehive." The memoirs were published in 1820 indicating that the name was in use for far longer than the current article suggests.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.109.209.226 (talk) 01:00, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  George Colman The Younger
Category talk:Prima ballerina assolutas

message: Is there objection to moving the prima ballerina assolutas category directly to the ballet dancers category? Doing so would make it more accessible. Robert Greer (talk) 23:06, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  move prima ballerina assolutas category to ballet dancers (crossposted to ballet dancers) 

message: A prima ballerina assoluta should not be placed in :Category:Ballerinas or :Category:Prima ballerinas any more than a general would be (redundantly) categorized as a colonel, major, captain and lieutenant. — Robert Greer (talk) 03:19, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  ballerinas vs. prima ballerinas vs. prima ballerina assolutas