lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Acenocoumarol

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://arno.unimaas.nl/show.cgi?fid=13850, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2017971, others. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 00:04, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Acriflavine

message: The CAS number is 65589-70-0, but CAS has no structure diagram, which is unusual. Is the structure of this really the one shown in the article? --Itub (talk) 15:03, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  CAS number 

message: "In an animal model, acriflavine has been shown to inhibit HIF-1, which prevents blood vessels growing to supply tumors with blood and interferes with glucose uptake and use."
Is this sentence trying to say that HIF-1 prevents blood vessels growing, or is it trying to say that the inhibition of HIF-1 prevents blood vessels growing?
203.13.3.93 (talk) 01:51, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ambiguous wording
Talk:Acrivastine

message: I would think mergeing "Semprex D" into the acrivastine page is a good idea.  It's not usual for drug brands to have their own page unless they are especially notable or common eg. Tylenol  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.67.34.50 (talk) 20:05, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Merging. – Acdx (talk) 16:26, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge Semprex D

message: No evidence other than the fact I just bought some at Sainsburys here in the UK. "Benadryl Allergy Relief Acrivastine", no need to see a pharmacist. Just taken off the shelf alongside certirizie and loratadine, and taken to the check-out.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.149.159.48 (talk) 14:56, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can now be bought over the counter in the UK 

message: What makes it unsuitable for treating seniors? 83.104.249.240 (talk) 21:17, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not for over 65s 

message: Trade name Lynnyoung48 (talk) 14:26, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's the action for this medication
Talk:Acute toxicity

message: Just wanted to announce the creation of a new Toxicology Task Force under WikiProject Medicine. Feel free to come and sign up. Thanks -- Jrtayloriv (talk) 04:06, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Toxicology Task Force
Talk:Adele Balasingham

message: For more details: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SAR23/Terrorism_%26_Terrorist_Tagging_are_POV_%26_Subjective
SAR23 15:15, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terrorism & Terrorist Tagging are POV & Subjective 

message: The war has been over for more than a year now and the LTTE largely dismantled. What is Mrs. Balasingham up to now? Is Sri Lanka seeking her extradition for war crimes?
--King ravana (talk) 06:42, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs to be updated
Talk:Adalimumab

message: Should Behcet's disease be added, or added under the heading of Uveitis? Disclaimer, I am not a medical brain, and am suggesting this on the talk page because I take it for BD, understand many others do and understand there is quite a bit of literature on this. So, I'm obviously not the right person to make a change to the article. I was thinking a sentence of two with citations could be added to the Uveitis part along the lines of "For example, uveitis associated with Behcet's disease". But not sure if that is on or off label use. Could some smarter people than me suggest whether this addition is warranted and the appropriate way to do it.
* 
* 
*  SiJoHaAl (talk) 07:50, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Behcet's disease 

message: Simponi, aka golimumab, was recently approved, making four TNF inhibitors...  Ronabop (talk) 05:19, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Golimumab not listed? 

message: This article reads in places like marketing material for this Medication,
"Adalimumab, like its TNF inhibitor competitors, infliximab, etanercept, certolizumab pegol and golimumab, has proven versatile in its effectiveness in treating several conditions."
this is not encyclopedic or is it? I'd try a slightly more neutral tone --Triple5 (talk) 10:19, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marketing material 

message: Do biosimilars like Expemtia, ABP 501 have same molecular formula etc as Humira ? Are either decorated with sugars ? Do we plan to cover all biosimilars in the article about the original biologic ? - Rod57 (talk) 14:45, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do biosimilars like expemtia have same molecular formula etc 

message: eg. says Novartis and Amgen biosimilars (to Humira) are now available across Europe. Also says some companies have agreed with AbbVie to not market their adalimumab biosimilars in USA until 2023. - Rod57 (talk) 09:12, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biosimilars now available in EU (but not USA) - Competition 

message: The image in the infobox is just a cartoon rendering of a generic IgG. It contains no features or details specific to adalimumab, and I can find no link to adalimumab in the image page on Commons. I have removed it from this article because it doesn't add any particular value. TenOfAllTrades(talk) 21:51, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed image 

message: The New York Times story by Robbins cited in the article is a major story about how the price of Humera (adalimumab) has risen to >$80,000 a year, which makes it unaffordable to patients without good health insurance. This is as a result of a patent strategy that was designed to "make it ore difficult for a biosimilar to follow behind," according to an AbbVie executive. For example, in 2014, AbbVie got a patent for a method of treating ankylosing spondylitis with a 40 milligram dose, adding 11 years of patent protection. There are many articles in WP:RS and WP:MEDRS about pricing and patents, which are hardly mentioned in this entry. I think it should go in. Any objections?  Nbauman (talk) 18:53, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  NYT story on price, patents
Talk:Alagebrium

message: Considering that the drug is not for sale by the company and probably never will be, flagging the article as advertising is inappropriate.  It really should be pulled. (talk) 14:37, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, I meant the tag should be pulled.  Keith Henson (talk) 21:40, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertising
Talk:Kachari language

message: Outline grammar of the Kachári (Bårå) language as spoken in District Darrang, Assam : with illustrative sentences, notes, reading lessons, and a short vocabulary (1884)
https://archive.org/details/outlinegrammarof00endlrich
Rajmaan (talk) 23:03, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outline grammar of the Kachári (Bårå) language as spoken in District Darrang, Assam : with illustrative sentences, notes, reading lessons, and a short vocabulary (1884)
Talk:Alfaxolone/alfadolone

message: Hi, I intend to add some information to this page on mechanisms and clinical use. I would also like to replace the drug box with a more up to date version. This would mean using a new compound image from Pubchem. I'm not expecting any objections so I will go ahead and make the changes but do let me know if you have any problems at all. Cheers   --IcyEd (talk) 12:01, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article expansion 

message: The drug box was recently changed. It does look better without the IUPAC names but I think the picture and chemical detail should come back. These are available separately, but the information has a unique entry on pubchem. The chemical data did appear to be a 1:1 mixture of the two however, not 3:1, so I'm open to suggestions. --IcyEd (talk) 10:59, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Drug Box
Talk:Amidrine

message: Would like to see the name changed to Midrin, as that is what it is most commonly referred to. I have no idea how to begin that process of changing the name, so I will leave it here for someone to see at a future date. Thanks! Aglo123 (talk) 00:17, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name change to "Midrin"? 

message: https://migrainedisease.com/news/midrin-and-equivalents-for-migraine-say-good-bye/
links to FDA letters are included in article  Genetikbliss (talk) 21:54, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discontinued again
Talk:Amifostine

message: The article needs to say the mechanism of the drug!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.189.182.28 (talk) 01:29, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I asked at WP:PHARM, and User:Mikael Häggström has added a section.  Thanks for your comments, Walkerma (talk) 18:37, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Amrinone

message: actually being used anywhere? From what I've read it has been withdrawn. JFW | T@lk 08:33, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this 

message: Seems a bit of a riddle, not sure it's even right... 81.158.152.189 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 22:51, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mechanism of Action 
Talk:Amurca

message: I suppressed an inappropriate and approximate source from a Texan blog on gardening. The only relevant "information" it contained regarding amurca, "Varro can be credited with discovering the first chemical weed killer in the first century BC ", is wrong, as Cato the Elder already described the properties of amurca in detail more than a hundred years earlier (besides, all this must have been well-known much before that time, and to "credit" with this discovery anybody from this period simply because he wrote about it is unjustified. Sapphorain (talk) 17:36, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suppression of inappropriate source  

message: This article makes use of citation markers in round brackets throughout the text without any references. 82.132.247.131 (talk) 20:54, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of citation markers without sources
Talk:Amylmetacresol

message: The first reference for this article (used extensively to back up claims such as saying amylmetacresol is oxidized to a carboxylic acid) is: Haberfeld H, ed. (2020). Austria-Codex (in German). Vienna: Österreichischer Apothekerverlag. Neo-Angin-Pastillen.
I've been looking for a while now and I can't seem to find the source or author anywhere. Is there a better citation that can be found online? I can't find any evidence that AMC is oxidized before being eliminated and excreted. Figarocat (talk) 10:41, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  First reference is difficult to locate
Talk:Love Is a Crime

message: Chart trajectories have no place in Wilkipedia. I removed them from all of Anastacia's pages, but I see someone has undone my changes here. To quote Wilki policy from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:MUSIC/CHARTS
A song/album's chart trajectory should not be included in an article, even if it is verifiable. Including the chart trajectory constitutes an indiscriminate collection of information. Chart trajectories should instead be briefly described in the text of the article or in a table for charts.
Guylikeu 14:56, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trajectories
Talk:Andrographolide

message: Sometimes a stub is more than nothing. 
For me it was helpfully because I bought some medicin in China against diarreha whitout any idea was in it. 
Und thanks Wiki I take it...
ATLANTIS (talk) 17:33, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

message: The article says that this compound is "effective against certain cancers", which seems unlikely to me.  Unless there is reference to a clinical trial that showed effectiveness I will remove this statement shortly. ChemNerd (talk) 23:53, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Cancer
Talk:Anidulafungin

message: "Glucan synthase is not present in mammalian cell walls and therefore is an attractive target for antifungal activity."
Do mammalian cells have cell walls? Isn't it confused with cell membranes?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.29.161.94 (talk) 18:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mammalian cell walls? 

message: Would be nice if article stated that this is taken intravenously, as that is quite fundamental info about the nature of the drug:
"ERAXIS for injection is a sterile, lyophilized product for intravenous (IV) infusion that contains anidulafungin" -- http://www.rxlist.com/eraxis-drug.htm
Zarkme (talk) 06:09, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oral / Intravenous 

message: I believe the formula of anidulafungin needs revision. The carbon atom in position 22 should be replaced by a nitrogen atom as is evident eg from the IUPAC name of the compound.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.193.91.201 (talk) 14:03, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formula 
Talk:Antenatal steroid

message: Quote: "A study in 2020 suggests exposure to maternal antenatal corticosteroid treatment is significantly associated with mental and behavioral disorders in children." diff
As I understand, the current practice at Wikipedia is to use secondary sources (reviews, books) and not primary sources (study reports). Does this recently added sentence comply with Wikipedia's sourcing policies? ---CopperKettle 04:47, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Association with behavioral problems 

message: Hi everyone! I thought it could be a good idea to have some sort of comparison on how different countries address antenatal corticosteroids, so I made a table summarizing some of the national guidelines. I could only do so for guidelines published in English, however. Does anyone have any thoughts or feedback, as I am a novice Wikipedian :) --Alir29 (talk) 01:11, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comparing National Guidelines Recommendations
Talk:Nevil Maskelyne (magician)

message: Could I find out a bit more about the connection between Maskelyne and the Anglo-American Telegraph Company?  That's inconsistent with the New Scientist article ( which is such a cool story I wonder why I haven't heard of this before). I think there was no relation between Anglo-American and Poulsen, either - at least in the US, Cyril Frank Elwell had bought the rights to the Poulsen arc converter. --Wtshymanski (talk) 16:49, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: There are other links that support Maskelyne having been a manager of the AATC, such as this. Unfortunately, the link given is pay-walled. Feel free to improve on the article in any way you can, including improving links, but I do think the information about Maskelyne and AATC is correct, and documented. ubiquity (talk) 14:58, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Patents?
Talk:Apraclonidine

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement.  Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. --Minimac (talk) 17:02, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Araroba powder

message: The article states:
The drug is a feeble antiparasitic, and has been used locally in the treatment of ringworm. 
This is an awkward sentence because it refers to Araroba as an antiparasitic, and then refers Araroba's use in the treatment of ringworm.
Ringworm is not a parasite:  the article on dermatophytosis explicitly states that the 'most common term for the infection, "ringworm", is a misnomer, since the condition is caused by fungi of several different species and not by parasitic worms.'
Araroba may be a feeble antiparasitic, and it may be used to treat ringworms, but connecting this two ideas is invalid reasoning.
2603:3016:1708:31E0:A48F:E00A:8E09:7F02 (talk) 20:39, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I broke up the sentence and put some distance between the two pieces of information. Hopefully it is better, if not, feel free to adjust it. Lalaithan (talk) 04:27, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Antiparasitic versus ringworm
Talk:Area under the curve

message: What about at least a link to another common use as the area under the Receiver_Operating_Characteristic curve? Uncoolbob 16:42, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  AUC (ROC) 

message: What about removing this article beacues it AUC is just a retard's name for an integral?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.128.173.162 (talk) 12:10, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove
Talk:Argyrol

message: "silver protein" — ???  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.208.234.206 (talk) 18:28, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  There isn't even a chemical formula 

message: The current article, with reference to Schack 1963, says Barnes bought out Hille in 1907; Lindsay 2011 says he bought him out in 1908 after a court case.  Which should be preferred?
Frenezulo (talk) 17:58, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  When did Barnes buy out Hille?
Talk:Diclofenac/misoprostol

message: I love how someone finally added the pregnancy warning now that a major research study 'outed' Wikipedia as being a poor source for seeking drug information and how this vitally inportant piece of information was omitted before. Dryamaka  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.215.94.13 (talk) 21:25, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dangers
Talk:Asparaginase

message: Research suggests asparaginase reduces the production of acrylamide, a potentially dangerous compound that is created during the high-temperature frying and baking of starchy foods. --Iiaiiappa (talk) 20:28, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm aware of WP:COI and thus would like to raise to the community a portion of this article that I think could be improved. Can you please consider updating the "Medical" section in the article to add the below text under the third paragraph (chronological order)? 
* What I think should be changed: 
“On July 24, 2006, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration granted approval to pegaspargase for the first-line treatment of patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) as a component of a multiagent chemotherapy regimen. Pegaspargase was previously approved in February 1994 for the treatment of patients with ALL who were hypersensitive to native forms of L-asparaginase. 1,2
On December 20, 2018, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved calaspargase pegol-mknl, an asparagine specific enzyme, as a component of a multi-agent chemotherapeutic regimen for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in pediatric and young adult patients age 1 month to 21 years. This new product provides for a longer interval between doses compared to other available pegaspargase products. Calaspargase pegol-mknl has received FDA orphan drug designation.3,4”
* Why it should be changed: A later approval of a medication using asparaginase is included in this section, and I believe it is important for the public to be aware of the others. 
* References supporting the possible change (format using the "cite" button):
1. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17766659/
2. https://www.cancernetwork.com/view/fda-approves-oncaspar-first-line-all
3. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/resources-information-approved-drugs/fda-approves-longer-acting-calaspargase-pegol-mknl-all
4. https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/906923
Micaela at Ruder Finn (talk) 17:35, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I reviewed your edit request, and honestly, I do not see any reason why we shouldn't add your text. Your edit request is APPROVED, as long as you stick to the text requestedd of course :). Craffael.09 (talk) 22:02, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

text: Done   ℰmi1y⧼T·C⧽ 10:31, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit to Asparaginase Medical Section 

message: Hi! We should probably include a controversies-style section detailing the maelstrom of issues with asparaginase that have cropped up over the last few years-- particularly as it's been causing harm to patients, failing to work properly, etc. 
It's apparently notable enough to receive a shoutout in Nature's daily briefing (https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-02200-9) which is about as prestigious as journal reporting gets. 
Here's a detailed report: https://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/stories/2023-01-25/the-drug-was-meant-to-save-childrens-lives-instead-theyre-dying   Atomic putty? Rien!  14:58, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Endemic and ongoing quality-control issues
Talk:Auranofin

message: This edit  from Oct'06 by a new user clearly has language style of a data sheet (ie copied & pasted here). Mechanism of Action and Pharmocokinetics seem almost direct lift from http://sitesv2.cornerdrugstore.com/healthContent/drugInfo/showMono.aspx?cpnum=50&gname=Auranofin#kin . Likewise side effect list clearly a direct lift from a data sheet and the use of non standard  as a bullet point clearly indicates a copy & paste from another website. As per WP copyvio policy, material removed on sight. 
The edits since  have added no extra info appart from a spelling change and german interwikilink, which I will now restore. David Ruben  Talk  20:49, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio removal

message: The structure shown has 34, not 35, hydrogen atoms and no positive charge.
Also, under Amebiasis markedly should be marked.
69.72.92.62 (talk) 04:52, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formula
Talk:Azelastine

message: This article lacks NPOV and reads like a marketing brochure. The clinical efficacy section looks particularly cherry-picked.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.160.99.48 (talk) 08:58, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

message: "The elimination half life, steady-state volume of distribution and plasma clearance are 22 h, 14.5 l/kg and 0.5 l/h/kg respectively (based on INTRAVENOUS and ORAL administration data)". 
Most eye drops and nasal sprays instructions say twice per day administration.
ee1518 (talk) 10:28, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is T1/2 = Half life meaningless in eye drops or nasal sprays?
Talk:Cristian Ledesma (footballer, born 1978)

message: He is 1973 born or 1978 born? Matthew_hk tc 09:34, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Age
Talk:Benzalkonium chloride/lidocaine

message: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1423035795405403605
There are several commercials here where the cream is sold as a ladies' facial clenser & softner to be applied twice daily to prevent anything from happening to the face instead of applying it after the damage has been done. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.17.118.100 (talk) 10:18, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bactine Medicated Skin Cream
Talk:Juan Pablo Carrizo

message: If you don't have a source, it doesn't go on the page. Alexrushfear 12:42, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No source no talk. Matthew_hk tc 07:47, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Lazio