lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Highliner

message: Okay, the original fleet was not all St. Louis Car...the first 130 were...and later after St. Louis folded Bombardier built 30 nearly identical cars to allow the last of the 1926 cars to be replaced.  I think that might correspond to the 78/79 date given in the article.  Those dates definitely do not correspond to the rebuilding of the fleet which was, I think, in the 1990's.  One would not need to rebuild cars that were less than ten years old...think about it.  So that needs fixing.
Also, the 1926 cars were not heavyweights.  I think it would be fair to describe them as "heavyweight style."  But you'd be surprised how much aluminum was on those 1926 cars.  Rooftops...electrical conduit etc.
Anyway, I'm not making any changes, not yet anyway, as I would need to check to verify the exact dates and find cites etc.  But my info is correct to the best of my knowledge.Filmteknik (talk) 04:29, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Errors

message: Are the current bi-level fleet made by Nippon-Sharyo actually called Highliners as so stated in the article? It is my understanding that Highliner refers to the St. Louis Car and Bombardier cars of the 1970's, not the new N-S cars of the 2010's.N9jig (talk) 05:02, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: New fleet

message: I recently found myself poking around the Nippon Sharyo website and came across the naming scheme of what are generally known as the "Highliner 2"s. Turns out the three active models have three separate names, so I am considering to update the article to reflect this official naming scheme:
- "Highliner" - Metra Units Built 2005-2006 (https://www.n-sharyo.co.jp/business/tetsudo_e/pages/zusametra-emu2005.htm)
- "Gallery Type Bi-Level EMU" - NICTD Units (https://www.n-sharyo.co.jp/business/tetsudo_e/pages/znictd.htm)
- "'Highliner II' Gallery Type Bi-Level EMU" - Metra Units Built 2012-2016 (https://www.n-sharyo.co.jp/business/tetsudo_e/pages/zusametra-emu2017.htm)
Just thought I'd point this out and that I'm considering updating the article to fix this, admittedly a bit nit picky, fact. Piemadd (talk) 00:28, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The most common name for all of the METRA EMU's is "Highliner" and given the article's level of detail I would keep them combined. See how the page on  Silverliner and Arrow (railcar) are currently handled. In the case of Silverliner some of the individual classes are broken out into their own pages as enough detail was added.Sturmovik (talk) 01:07, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh I'm not saying we should split them out onto their own page, I'm just saying that the ones built in the early 2000s aren't Highliner IIs, technically speaking at least. Piemadd (talk) 22:56, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Highliner Naming Confusion
Talk:Microsoft Analysis Services

message: The latest edition, SQL Server 2014, is not mentioned. The BI Semantic (Tabular) Model is not mentioned. The displayed logo is for SQL Server 2008 (currently 6 years ago, nearly an eternity in IT). The "History" section stops at SQL Server 2005 (9 years ago ...). There is no mention of DAX as a query language. I'll gladly help updating this as soon as my current project is finished, but still: Where the hell are the BI professionals helping to update this article? Most of the info here is from ... what ... 2005? SplatMan DK (talk) 21:16, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Holy cow, how lang has it been since this article was updated?
Talk:SQL Server Reporting Services

message: Somebody keeps adding a link to Aspose Words for Reporting Services, which seems to be blatant advertising for a commercial product.  Is there any rationale behind having it?  It doesn't seem to have any place in an SSRS article. ShatteredArm 06:31, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: http://www.optimusbi.com/2012/10/17/report-server-role-management-ssrs/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.180.134.186 (talk) 08:14, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

text: While Aspose might not be part of SSRS, many SSRS developers do use it. I would suggest having a section specifically about third party plugins as the possibility to use third party plugins is an important part of how the core software is designed to be extendable.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.38.34.2 (talk) 09:18, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Links 

message: This page is quite lacking for something that is really starting to gain traction. I'll try to spend some time on it if I can. I have begun by added a few links that explain how people can integrate SSRS with their Java applications, etc. 81.134.144.135 (talk) 17:20, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia is not a manual. An article about software should explain its history, general applications, and relationship to other software, but it's not necessary (and possibly even harmful) to attempt to provide a user guide. Ibadibam (talk) 22:36, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  General thoughts 

message: It is administered via a web interface. Reporting services features a web services interface to support the development of custom reporting applications.
These two sentences say the same thing in different ways.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.59.221.42 (talk) 19:49, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening Paragraph 

message: This paragraph seems strangely written to me, with some grammatical errors too. I think it could certainly do with a rewrite by someone more knowledgeable on the subject than me.
Typically the reports are only revealed to users able to run them, and SQL connections in the source allow anyone to run with sufficient privileges. This is because configuring Windows Authentication through the reports execution is laborious and time consuming: a Server Principal Name record (requiring DOMAIN ADMINISTRATOR access) is created in Active Directory associating the Sql Server Reporting service to the user the service runs under on the server (a network user to facilitate querying the Active Directory)... and the service account user has to have the delegation option enabled, the server must be trusted for delegation too; the windows users wishing to run reports must be set to allow delegation - so Kerberos authentication protocols will be used. The reporting service itself has to have the configuration edited to enable Kerberos protocols... but then the reports will be secure and only display data the individual users are permitted to (based on SQL security configuration). 
165.225.81.41 (talk) 15:10, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paragraph in "Use" section
Talk:CodeView

message: Despite the fact that MikeMo wrote in the explanations to windbg sources, that "I don't know who owns CVEXEFMT.H"; we can assume that the author of all files with the prefix cv* is David Norris. The source is primary, but maybe someone can find a secondary one (WP:RS). Halfcookie (talk) 12:32, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  CodeView sources are present in the [[WinDbg]] sources
Talk:The Peace Museum

message: Is there a special reason why "The" is included at the start of the article name? My reading of Wikipedia:Naming conventions (definite and indefinite articles at beginning of name) is that this should be avoided where possible.— Rod talk 19:50, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Peace museum is a general article. You're right though. This article should probably be called Peace Museum (Chicago) but I'd like to hear another opinion before actually moving it. --Gimme danger (talk) 20:17, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The" in title
Talk:Microsoft P-Code

message: Shouldn't this article be written in the past tense? Medinoc (talk) 11:47, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Currency

message: The "VB P-code Information by Mr Silver" url is occupied by a doman sitter. And so, because of their farcial robots.txt policy, the Wayback machine refuses to show the archived page.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.206.162.148 (talk) 08:52, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken reference is broken by broken Wayback machine 

message: This article is a stub, it will never not be a stub, and it's tagged for lack of references.  It needs to be merged somewhere relevant.  (I tagged Visual Basic, but I don't have strong opinions or the right background for it, so pick whatever makes sense.) -- C. A. Russell (talk) 20:10, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I suggest that p-code machine might be a better target; agree that it is worth merging somewhere. Klbrain (talk) 12:55, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  Klbrain (talk) 00:04, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Visual Basic (or something)
Talk:Huntington Bank Pavilion

message: I propose renaming this article, from Charter One Pavilion to FirstMerit Bank Pavilion.  As referenced in the article, the venue was renamed a few days ago, so the article should be renamed too. — Mudwater (Talk) 16:15, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a done deal. — Mudwater (Talk) 00:07, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed rename 
Talk:House of Blues

message: Added the new Houston Location that will be completed next year, added a reference section. 
--Hourick 17:30, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition of location/link 

message: I've re-written the lead to make it slightly clearer. I cannot think that the lead to such a short WP entry could contain much more information, so I've removed the tag: 
:The introduction to this article provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject.
Please comment if you disagree. Mick gold (talk) 10:09, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead 

message: Wasn't the House of Blues used in the 2003 movie Freaky Friday when Lindsay Lohan played as the teenager in a band? 
DominiquesMusic (talk) 22:42, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  reference 
Talk:FxCop

message: What does the name mean and where did it come from?
Tzadik (talk) 14:33, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: What does the name mean?

message: As it stands there is nothing in the article as a reference or to establish notability. If someone has good 3rd party sources please add them. AliveFreeHappy (talk) 03:35, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Instituto Técnico Militar

message: Both articles are about the same entity. Hatchens (talk) 15:57, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not the same entity, the History really appplies to the building of Colegio de Belén, Havana. So, maybe, the other way around, the Instituto merged into Belen. There are no photos of the Instituto (can't get into the place, is closely guarded, I tried in 2017), little history of the Instituto Técnico Militar.  It can also be left as is, i.e. two pages. ovA_165443 (talk) 16:09, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Closing merge proposal; uncontested objection and no support. Klbrain (talk) 13:40, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Colegio de Belén, Havana]] into [[Instituto Técnico Militar]]
Talk:The Fireside Bowl

message: What we have for this place is really sad. It hosted the best of local independent punk for 10 years, and this is all there is and it's written without encyclopedic tone. Also, if you have memories of what it was like (same as I), you still need references to back-up what would otherwise just be opinionated descriptions. Opinions are not encyclopedic. There should also be information about what it's like now. --99.140.255.223 (talk) 18:48, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Improvement 

message: Seems a lack of notability, seems the article was written by a fan as a way to promote this place, not really what wikipedia is.--0pen$0urce (talk) 18:47, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable?
Talk:Jazz Showcase

message: I edited the external links section to add the club's official website.  Also, here is a web page that contains history of the club in some detail.  It may serve to validate some of the claims in the article in order to remove the banner.  But is this a "solid enough" reference?
http://www.chibarproject.com/Reviews/JazzShowcase/JazzShowcase.htm
Sblument (talk) 02:57, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Microsoft Research

message: The second paragraph says: "Microsoft spent about $6 billion annually in research initiatives from 2002 to 2010 and has spent from $10–14 billion annually since 2010" and then cites articles talking about Microsoft's R&D line item from the financials as evidence.  The vast, vast majority of MSFT's R&D spending is for development, so concluding that it's all being spent in "research initiatives" is incorrect.  This should probably be removed or substantially reworked. 65.102.177.19 (talk) 05:23, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Budget
Talk:The Chicago Defender

message: This article refers to 'Abbott' and his/her importance several times without ever giving a first name or title as though this text is a piece of a larger article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.57.209.142 (talk) 23:41, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article shares much with the PBS article at http://www.pbs.org/blackpress/news_bios/defender.html. --Bejnar (talk) 18:09, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I have no problem with you deleting possible copyrighted text, although you might have wanted to do so in a manner which didn't compromise the integrity of the article itself.  Perhaps actually replace the lede rather than simply delete it.Shsilver (talk) 19:48, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible copyright violation

message: "In just three years from 1919–1922[1] the Defender also attracted the writing talents of Langston Hughes and Gwendolyn Brooks."
The linked bio says Brooks was five at the end of 1922.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.9.18.224 (talk) 09:20, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Huh?  

message: The 2004 feature article "Black Is Back" in Editor & Publisher goes into some depth about the paper's reemergence in that era. Worth digging into it, for possible expansion of Wikipedia coverage.
-Pete Forsyth (talk) 22:10, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neglected source 

message: I have a story to tell 2601:46:480:12F0:107C:4B22:11E5:CC39 (talk) 21:41, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Veterans neglect
Talk:Chicago Democrat

message: I have a copy of an 1891 The Chicago Democrat. It is Vol58 No19.  It states it is a Jeffersonian Democratic paper that is in its 58th year of publishing. Meaning it started the same year as your article states The Chicago Democrat started 1833. But is being continuously published 30 years past the date given in your article 1861
      The paper is in the Library of Easton’s Castle. 1210 2nd Ave NW Aberdeen SD.  It’s front page can be viewed on Facebook at Easton Castle/O-TE-LA Conservancy.   Otela89 (talk) 01:19, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Years The Chicago Democrat was published.  

message: They do not care and gonna let them keep on doing. And clear there name not mine tho thanks... I have never done it. Wonder if they care about God or others. 108.147.101.59 (talk) 01:53, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:   political parties care about God
Talk:RedEye

message: This article could be renamed The (Chicago, Ill.) RedEye to match how the newspaper is cited.Bigturtle 15:01, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Renaming

message: Since I have a conflict of interest with the RedEye, I'll refrain from editing directly, but I will point out a few things here so someone else can come along and edit it:
* The circulation is now 250,000. This increased last December. (sources: , )
* It would be nice as well if someone mentioned RedEye's Internet strides such as their Google Wave experiment (source from Mashable  and it ended in April ), or the RedEye Royalty (a reader loyalty program of sorts ). This would need a bit more work, of course.
Thanks to whoever comes along. elektrikSHOOS 17:21, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've gone ahead and updated the number myself. If I have sources and I'm only updating a number, there shouldn't be an issue, but if anyone doesn't like it feel free to undo the edit. elektrikSHOOS 17:29, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article is woefully out of date
Talk:Rive Gauche Nightclub

message: I removed the lack of references tag and moved two speculative paragraphs to a new "Folklore" section. There are simply no additional sources available to verify the claims this article makes, but that does not mean it's not worth keeping. Moreover, the name of the cocktail waitress was removed for privacy reasons in addition to lack of notoriety. Voice of Reason 06:41, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Flach (submarine)

message: in spanish: http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Submarino_Flach
the article in which is based this page have several errors... the Santiago Times is not the best reference resource... please review it.
i.e.: the Flach was the ninth submarine in the world, not the fifth...
1º "Turtle", 1775, USA
2º "Nautilus", 1800, France
3º "Halsey", 1814, USA
4º "Brandtaucher", 1851, Germany
5º "Alligator", 1863, USA
6º "Plongeur", 1863, France
7º "H.L. Hunley", 1864, USA
8º "Ictini II", 1864, Spain
9º "FLACH", 1865, Chile
Where does that list come from? If it's from a reliable source, the article should definitely be changed accordingly. Yet for some reason I remember the "Brandtaucher" as the first submarine in the world, even though I can easily be wrong there. LoneWolfJack 09:17, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Triple Crown of Brazilian Football

message: Triple Crown is a term used by European team when they won the Champions'League, National League and National Cup. In South America, it should be Libertadores, National League and National Cup. Thus, no team have won this yet. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.108.137.234 (talk • contribs).
:According to a book, named É Campeão, by Vanderlei Luxemburgo and Ingo Ostrovsky, Cruzeiro is the only club to have achieved the Brazilian Triple Crown (Cruzeiro won the state championship, the national championship and the national cup). The fact is that the Brazilian Triple Crown is different from the European Triple Crown. A Brazilian club disputing Copa Libertadores is not allowed by the Brazilian Football Confederation to dispute the same year's Copa do Brasil (National Cup), so having an European-like Triple Crown doesn't make sense in Brazil. Check this link (in Portuguese language) and check the following news: news 1, news 2 and news 2. Please, discuss before making significant  changes to the article. --Carioca 06:26, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Triple Crown in Brazil

message: Can Flamengos run in 2019 be considered worthy of the triple crown? Winning the Campeonato Carioca , the Copa Libertadores and the Campeonato Brasileiro - Seria A in a years seem to be noteworthy to me (even though they did not win the Copa do Brasil). Any further objections? --LH7605 (talk) 18:33, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flamengo 2019
Talk:Adolph Dubs

message: The Arlingtoncemetery.net link  contains text that places Dubs in the Marine Corps, but the photograph of his tombstone specifies United States Navy. Lieutenant commander isn't a Marine rank, so I changed the branch of service to the Navy. If I'm wrong, we should change it back and put a note on the talk page so no one else makes the same mistake. Sgorton (talk) 23:01, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Branch of Service 

message: The article contradicts itself. Either two kidnappers were murdered after capture, or one was murdered and the other escaped. The article gives both inconsistent versions.122.59.167.152 (talk) 10:54, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Murder of kidnappers 

message: This article says nothing about its subject's family and early life, skipping from his birth to college graduation.  Who were his parents?  Did he have siblings?  Where was he raised?  Did he marry?  All of these issues should be handled in a biographical article. --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 17:38, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Family and early life?
Talk:Buck

message: 'Before' formal currency in North America, the informal currency was the hide of one fully grown male beaver - a buck.  ```` ItsACityOfApes (talk) 02:48, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi . If you have a citation for this, I suggest that you add it to the US dollar page, here, with the WP:RS. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 11:15, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Buck as slang for dollar 

message: *In Thermoforming and Vacuum Forming ,  "buck" is used as a term for the Mold/Form the Plastic Sheet is Drawn Over
*Would a redirect to those pages and/or a mention be a worthwhile addition?
--Eric Lotze (talk) 01:06, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use as a Term for The Form/Mold in [[Thermoforming]]
Talk:Bishop McNamara High School

message: I'd be surprised if the school didn't write this article themselves as kind of advertising; it's a little lacking in the NPOV, particularly in the history section. I'm flagging it.
Yeah, I added my name on the "Alumni" section. Paleridernightwolf 06:53, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:D. K. Holm

message: I have reviewed the resources to be found on mr. Holm's published writings. seems to me the bio is NPOV. VanTucky 05:54, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: auto bio tag removal
Talk:Global LGBTQIA+ Employee & Allies at Microsoft

message: I think there should be a disambiguation link added to the top of this file.  Just as if one person searches for KRZR on Wikipedia and is taken to the radio station KRZR, there is a disambiguation link and also a link to the MOTOKRZR article.  The same should be added here for the Samsung Gleam. Mattygabe (talk) 18:24, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add Disambiguation Link 

message: Would it be possible to get support from Microsoft for Scouting for All? --Puellanivis (talk) 14:03, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scouting for All? 