lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Theophilus P. Chandler Jr.

message: There are 6 NRHP-listed places which credit variations upon "Theophilus Chandler" as a name, which I assume all relate to the subject of this article.  They are (with spelling variations): 
*Bishop Mackay-Smith House, 251 S. 22nd St. Philadelphia, PA Chandler,Theophilis Parsons 
*Bridge in Radnor Township No. 1, Goshen Rd. over Darby Creek Broomall, PA Chandler,Theophilus P. 
*Compton and Bloomfield, 9414 Meadowbrook Ave. Philadelphia, PA and Whitemarsh, PA Chandler,Theophilus P.  
*Germantown Junction Station, 2900 N. Broad St. Philadelphia, PA Chandler,Theophilus P. 
*Stirling (Reading, Pennsylvania), 1120 Centre Ave. Reading, PA Chandler,Theophelus P. 
*Trinity Episcopal Church, 1108 N. Adams St. Wilmington, DE Chandler,Theophilus P. 
Not sure which of these are already covered in this article;  all are wikipedia-notable places and could/should be linked from here. --doncram 15:06, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: After visiting the linked articles for all but Compton and Bloomfield (currently a redlink), they now all have links back to this article.  Still not sure if they need to be added as outgoing links from this article.  Leaving that for anyone else to consider.  --doncram 15:16, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Compton was demolished in 1968, and this article has HABS photos of it. Does Bloomfield still exist? --BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 14:50, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  NRHP-listed works
Talk:East Midlands franchise

message: I haven't got time to update this article myself but Stagecoach have been awarded the contract. See DfT press release http://www.gnn.gov.uk/environment/fullDetail.asp?ReleaseID=293825&NewsAreaID=2&NavigatedFromDepartment=False and here's an article from the BBC http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/6229246.stm. Adambro 07:47, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I support the merger.  We don't need separate articles for this and the operator: both would be better explained in one place.  --RFBailey 22:36, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No.  Having two articles overcomplicates the situation.  While the franchise is technically separate from the company operating it, the two articles are essentially about the same topic.  Fragmenting (or duplicating) information across two articles is unnecessary and potentially confusing: this is an unfortunate trait that appears across many UK railway articles (take the Central Citylink page for example).  It is far better to explain things in context by just having all relevant information in one place.  Once the TOC becomes operational, Stagecoach Midland Rail (or whatever brand name they decide upon: the article can be moved when this is known) will be the most common name for the subject, so that should be the article title.  --RFBailey 22:20, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, but maybe later recreate this article with sufficient information, but that of the franchise and not the TOC. Simply south 11:23, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Merge We know basically nothing about SMR, so it shouldn't have its own page yet. Once some TOC-specific details emerge (especially its brand name, which may well not be SMR), we can switch to the precedent of having a TOC article that also describes the franchise. At no point should there be two articles like this. --Dtcdthingy 08:47, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger
Talk:Leslie Satcher

message: Are there any references to support the point that she is "well-known for publicly burning copies of the Bible"? (Her earlier career suggests that she once held conventional religious beliefs)Longhillman (talk) 06:28, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:1794 Treason Trials

message: Wouldn't it be better to link directly from the lead to Radicalism (historical) (from some part of "the British radical movement of the 1790s" for example), rather than relegating it to a "See also".  Doesn't the manual of Style suggest such sections should generally be avoided in favour of integrating the links into the article content?  David Underdown 15:25, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree completely. I just stumbled across the page while I was posting sections today and I wanted to remind myself of it. I haven't even thought about where to link it yet since much of this article is so new. Do you have a suggestion? Awadewit | talk 15:53, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well as I said, something like the British radical movement of the 1790s, depending just how much of that bit of text you feel needs to be in the link.  I just wanted to make sure you didn't haev some definite reason for not linking really, or I'd have done it straight away.  Could even go straight to the UK section of the (radicalism) article, but the background would probably be useful to people, and the UK bit's the first thing after the lead anyway.  Now I'll leave you to it before this Brit is tempted to dive into the spelling question... David Underdown 16:04, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't realize that exact phrase was in the article - I will go find it now. Do you want to work on this article with me? I just added a lot of texts to the bibliography and I despair of having time to read them all since I am busy writing my dissertation and writing other wikipedia pages. I would gladly capitulate on the BE question if it meant I had another editor to work with~ :) Awadewit | talk 16:09, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't really have the knowledge, I think I only came here because I saw your comments to Geogre on his talkpage, and I've read a few novels set in the period and thought I'd pick up a bit of background knowledge.  Besides, with The Proms about to kick off, I'll be a bit short of time for the next couple of months.  David Underdown 16:14, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds wonderful. Awadewit | talk 16:56, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  See Also/Radicalism link 

message: As far as I know, there were meetings in Copenhagen Fields in October and in November 1795. For John Gale Jones, I'd be interested to know of anything dating this print more accurately. Charles Matthews (talk) 09:29, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Gillray print date
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Business/Accounting task force

message: I am hoping, in the coming weeks, to focus on enhancing the wiki pages for the Big Four accounting firms. I would be interested in feedback from other editors about details that are missing from these pages, information that is inaccurate and other suggestions. I look forward to collaborating on these efforts. Icanseearainbow (talk) 07:26, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Enhancing the Big Four accounting firms pages 

message: An article that  been involved with ( Bond (finance) ) has content that is proposed to be removed and moved to another article (). If you are interested, please visit the discussion. Thank you. A. C. Santacruz ⁂ Please ping me! 15:42, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Splitting discussion for [[ Bond (finance) ]]

message: In reviewing the lead section of Cash, I noticed that we don't have a distinct article for the concept in accounting, as described in the lead of that article. Do members of this wikiproject think that a distinct article (at, say, Cash (accounting)) would be sensible? — HTGS (talk) 01:32, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cash 

message: Would it be possible to change the link in the section "Accounting Standards" that currently says "Generally accepted principles" and links to Accounting_standard (Redirected from Generally accepted accounting principles). 
My suggestion is to replace this link with, or add a new link in this section to the article Generally_Accepted_Accounting_Principles_(United_States)
The problem with the current link is that the page referenced did not go where I was expecting it to. But on the other hand it contains a list of articles for various countries so I got where I wanted just with an additional click. 
Thank you. 2601:642:4981:96E0:5193:EE9E:AC6F:F8EB (talk) 20:04, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request to change a link in the "part of a series on Accounting" navigation side bar 

message: I want to suggest the following as a project here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oil_depletion_allowance Starlighsky (talk) 02:32, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion for Oil depletion allowance to be a project
Talk:Rani Bagh, Delhi

message: Note:  Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 13:38, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Delhi Addition
Talk:Kapasan

message: Note:  Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 07:16, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition
Talk:Demographics of Karnataka

message: The pie chart does not match with the figures as given in the text (especially Christians and Muslims). What are the correct figures? --BertSen (talk) 23:46, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Religions in Karnathaka 
Talk:Artemis Fowl: The Graphic Novel

message: On the bottom row, the first two pictures, I'd say that's Root and Holly. The one in the middle is either Foaly, Mulch, or the troll; the one too it's right is most likely Butler. As for that last one, it's probably a goblin. I can't really say until I read the book, so I didn't add it to the caption. If anyone has a source that tells us whos pictures those are, please add the info. Thanks! --Wack'd Talk to me! • Admire my handiwork! 02:31, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, correct but rather trivial. This is an encyclopedia, after all, not the Artemis Fowl Wiki. Calvin 1998 (t·c) 00:01, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cover photo
Talk:Donation (Catholic canon law)

message: The redirect Donation (in Canon Law) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Veverve (talk) 12:22, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Donation (in Canon Law)]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Sant'Angelo in Pescheria

message: Categorization delas with the socalled Madonna della Grazie or Madonna with the Son that in the 13rd century was substituted to a previous Micaelic painting (source: p. 247). The church also hosts this picture and a Greek-like architecture which is typical  
But the main proof is that the Pope Saint Pius X suppressed the parish and moved it to the Collegiata a San Lorenzo in Lucina (source: guidasantuari.altervista.org).Regards, Theologian81sp (talk) 15:07, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Stop adding your own interpretations of sources, and your own point of view, to Wikipedia articles. --bonadea contributions talk 15:18, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: , The expression "Synagogue of Satan" is sourced in the encyclical Etsi multa luctuosa and I've to justify the related categorization.  Synagogue of Satan is the reality of the Satanist Freemasonry, as it is sourced in the aforementioned document. So far, it is justified by a reliable source and to censor its use is against WP:No censorship. More generally, users don't need a preventive permission by anyone to use expressions which are not insults. Just to give an example, let you have a look to the article of Barnabas (the current edit is linked tov 1032731377): I think expressions like "Paul took Silas as his companion" have a twofold ambiguity which worst than the expression "Synagogue of Satan". My textual can be replaced without the categorization. It was sourced by a reliable monography.Regards,Theologian81sp (talk) 15:44, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categorization:Freemasonry in Italy
Talk:Dynamic demand (electric power)

message: I like the clear explanation in this article, but I notice the Demand response article is conceptually very similar.  Is that incorrect?  If not, why shouldn't this all be in the same article?  -J JMesserly (talk) 00:08, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: They look like they are describing the same thing to me.  Yaris678 (talk) 16:56, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with [[Demand response]]? 
Talk:Smash product

message: Unicode has the symbol ⨳ for smash product. Is this a different smash product, or is this symbol just not mentioned in the article? —porges(talk) 08:55, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, that is the correct symbol, and it should be included in the article.  Senator2029 “let's talk”  19:54, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: That symbol is not displaying on my browser... and I thought I had a pretty complete set of fonts installed... User:Linas (talk) 17:15, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unicode symbol 

message: Please correct me if I am wrong, but I thought that the associativity of the smash product 
was not true for the whole category of pointed topological spaces but restricted
to something like locally compact spaces or something similar.
See also here.
Is there anybody who knows more about this? 
79.224.16.159 (talk) 18:50, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, something like that. Looks like someone already added comments from mathoverflow about this. This needs cleanup and fixing and exposition. User:Linas (talk) 17:20, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Associativity of Smash Product
Talk:Emperor Taizu of Jin

message: At the beginning of the fourth paragraph I am pretty sure it should be "Aguda rallied his tribesmen (around 2,500 men) at Lailiushui (來流水)" instead of "Liushui". Corresponding sentence in the Jinshi: "諸路兵皆會于來流水，得二千五百人。"(https://zh.wikisource.org/wiki/%E9%87%91%E5%8F%B2/%E5%8D%B72). --Britishclimate (talk) 23:11, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Liushui/Lalin River

message: This article seems to violate naming conventions.  If Abaoji should be "Emperor Taizu of Liao" then this article should be "Emperor Taizu of Jin"  ludahai 魯大海 08:57, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Naming

message: Can anyone confirm if he helped his father or brother to strengthen their clan? His father's name was Wanyan Helibo and his brother's name was Wanyan Wuyashu. How can it be possible that he helped his father (whose name is Helibo) Wuyashu? Did he have two names?
Blackangel25 (talk) 12:39, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: brother or father

message: In Chinese texts, his name is Āgǔdǎ, and in Old Manchu it is Agūda.  So where does this mysterious alternate reading "Akutta" come from?
Btawney (talk) 00:12, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: God knows. Google Books shows this spelling in a couple (older) books, that's it. I've reworded the "names" paragraph to indicate that it's a very rare spelling, much more rare than e.g. Wade-Giles A-ku-ta. Vmenkov (talk) 01:15, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Where does "Akutta" come from?

message: According to Liu Pujiang(Chinese:刘浦江)'s essay 'Doubts about truthfulness of the history of foundation of (Jurchen) Jin Dynasty' (Chinese: 关于金朝开国史的真实性质疑), maybe the era name 'Shouguo' didn't exist and the year 'Tianfu 1' is 1118AD instead of 1117AD. John Smith Ri (talk) 10:52, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  About whether the era name 'Shouguo' existed and when the era name 'Tianfu' start
Talk:Peculiarities of the National Fishing

message: I've created this article by doing a loose translation of the Russian copy. I've put the appropriate template in the page for now; I plan to remove it as soon as this page changed enough to no longer be just a translation, even if loose. IgorSF 09:00, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB.
Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 18:58, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "needs infobox" tag 

message: There are at least two more films in the series about the Russian bathing house called Banya. The the movies have erotic content though...--92.114.148.141 (talk) 19:42, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Banya
Talk:Apalachicola Province

message: If there is no objection in the next week, I intend to rename this article to Apalachicola Province (parallel to Apalachee Province). As noted above, "Apalachicola" is used much more often in sources to refer to a place or region than to a "people", and the most common name for the region is "Apalachicola Province". I have almost completed work on an article to be named Apalachicola (tribal town), which covers the second most common use of "Apalachicola", and complements this article. - Donald Albury 15:31, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moving article
Talk:Minokamo, Gifu

message: Perhaps some mention of the fact that this is on honshu?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.178.150.93 (talk) 15:04, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled

message: In June 2 2013, Minokamo mayor election held, which candidate Hiroto Fujii has elected youngest mayor in Japan.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 221.244.40.2 (talk • contribs) 15:04, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Minokamo Mayor
Wikipedia talk:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2007-06-15 Shoeless Joe Jackson

message: I have almost nothing to do with this edit war.  On June 1, I suggested that the parties stop edit warring.  On June 3, I made my last edit to the article, which was a pretty straightforward and simple edit.  Altogether, I don't think that I've made more than a half-dozen edits to the article over about 6 months.
I have avoided any contact with the article since June 3, mainly because I can't continue assuming good faith among the editors.  Quite simply, it looks to me like everybody involved is acting like children.
The only policy issue that I know of involves linking to a comercial site, that probably is spam.  The pictures of baseball cards are interesting, but they are there for sale.  The pictures of the cards themselves could have been uploaded and put in the article (the cards were published before 1923) EXCEPT that the pictures of the cards include watermarks or sales info.
Please leave me out of this.
Smallbones 09:12, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *This whole thing is disgusting, but lets please clarify one thing.  There is only one page where items are for sale.  Everything on that page is marked sold and the rest are not available for sale.  //18:58, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This page, right?  It actually looks extremely tame...I was expecting that you'd purchase things online.  It's basically contact information which can be use to buy stuff.  The absurdity of it all is that the similar link I mentioned (which I use to display a baseball card that is referencing a fact in the article, a fact that actually can be verified on said page) has links to 40 different online card sellers on it, which you can purchase cards from online.  Why am I not being criticized for this?  Oh, that's right, because it's not "my site".  It's a double standard for one user to criticize another for posting a link that may contain things that can be considered spam, but accept when another user links to a page that has lots of it.  All this has devolved into is one user making attacks at another for posting an external link that another user may or may not be involved in, a site that would have a conflict of interest if it weren't for the fact that OTHERS THINK IT IS AN ACCEPTABLE LINK!  One user doesn't think it is, and that user has turned all of this into a war.  It's just ridiculous...and ridiculously trivial. -- Transaspie 20:48, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

message: Be aware that the chief proponent of the website in question, User:Tecmobowl, has since been banned, along with his sockpuppets User:El redactor and User:Long levi. Tecmobowl has been demonstrated to be the owner of the site, although he has only admitted to "knowing" the owner of the site. Baseball Bugs 09:04, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tecmobowl banned
Talk:Host controller interface (USB, Firewire)

message: A host controller interface is a register level interface [...]
What's a register level interface? --Abdull 09:31, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Register level interface 

message: About 2 weeks ago I said this message in user Balrog-kun
I apologize this, because intially I was going to post this in discussion, but sinc eonly Abdull was writing something, I thought nobody else care about the article.
 Please DO NOT use Wikipedia as a form of advertise or to support anything. The intention of an 
 encyclopedia is to have a neutrality. (referring to the things that you added below under HCI 
 disambiguation)
 
 Host Controller Interface, an essential part of every Bluetooth subsystem is officially  
 abbreviated
 to HCI.  
  --Ramu50 (talk) 01:57, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  HCI 

message: No offense to previous authors but this section was too much a stream of consciousness.  
I've rewritten the first paragraph and integrated the second and third.  My technical knowledge is quite limited.  Correction of errors and further improvements in composition are welcome, ... PeterEasthope (talk) 15:03, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Enhanced Host Controller Interface 

message: As I understood, the article indicated that conformance testing by Intel helped to prevent incursion of proprietary features.  I would have thought that testing by an independent agent would be more effective.  Intel could introduce a proprietary feature and claim that the device was conformant.  Outsiders would learn otherwise only by finding a failure with conformant software, ... PeterEasthope (talk) 17:10, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intel hosted EHCI conformance testing ... 

message: While a hobbyist or a company with a smaller production run might implement some of USB in an FPGA, on PC motherboards the chips are manufactured by the millions. So they use custom silicon, integrated into the southbridge. With the cost of FPGAs and the commodity-scales of motherboards, an FPGA would be completely impractical. Even the block-diagrams of PCs show USB sprouting from the southbridge chip.
188.29.165.51 (talk) 22:53, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  FPGA
Talk:Inverkeithing

message: Hi, 
is it OK that I updated the page regarding the recent fire at the old primary school?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C5:3C16:5500:E8D5:9C87:9C7B:B483 (talk) 17:09, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  /* Landmarks */ - Update about old primary school (fire)
Talk:Widescreen signaling

message: This article seems to be erelevant only to PAL systems. Can anyone add the WSS description for NTSC  systems?
:The article does mention NTSC, but NTSC equipment seems to be unaware of the arrangement.  All DVD players that output NTSC signals (that I am aware of) do not include the information in the video signal even though they do when playing PAL DVDs. 109.153.242.10 (talk) 16:33, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Electronic Battle Weapon 9

message: Either I'm crazy, or EBW 9 was released well before EBW 8, which doesn't make any sense considering the article on EBW 8 says it was recorded in 2006, while it appears on an album that was apparently recorded in 1998.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.85.195.216 (talk) 00:20, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Issue with release dates?