Talk:List of Pokémon (221–251)

message: Tyrogue can evolve to any of 3 Pokemon. How can we get the infobox template to recognize that? Also, we're going to have the same problem with Gloom (Pokémon) when we get to it. -WarthogDemon 00:07, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: IMO, the Evolves To cell of the template should be modified so that it does not auto-link to whatever is put inside it; that cell should just be manually handled by page creators. That way, Gloom's Evolves To cell would have the code Vileplume / Bellossom, typed out like that. Erik Jensen (Appreciate|Laugh At) 18:11, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You know how to do that? I'm not good at making/adjusting templates. My experience ends with copy/paste. -WarthogDemon 20:16, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Can the names of the pokemon tyrouge evolves into not be separated by commas, with each of them linked seperately? -XxKibaxX Talk 20:19, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As far as I can tell, no. That just creates: Pokemon 1 Pokemon 2. -WarthogDemon 20:21, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm... I'll try it. -WarthogDemon 20:21, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It sorta worked . . . but it looks odd. -WarthogDemon 20:25, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not really that odd anymore. I'm almost positive that those tables are just that, tables, not templates. -XxKibaxX Talk 15:40, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tyrogue Problem 

message: Basic Pokémon are Pokémon that, when introduced, have no Evolved forms or Pre-Evolved forms. Baby Pokémon are Pokémon that, when introduced, have an Evolved form. They can't have Pre-Evolved Forms. So what do you call Tyrogue and Hitmontop? PMDFan (talk) 19:50, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: They are like Budew and Roserade in the 4th gen, kind of. Tyrogue was an interesting addition as a Baby Pokemon to evolve into the powerful Basic Pokemon of 'Lee and 'Chan. 'Top was added at the same time as Tyrogue, to be a third possibility of evolution, the harder one to get. When you got the Tyrogue in GSC, you thought "When its defense is higher, it's a Hitmonchan, if attack is higher, it's a Hitmonlee. What happens if they're the same???". Bottom line: 'Top is a Basic Pokemon, like the other two Hitmons, and Tyrogue is the Baby form of all 3. Hopefully this monologue helps. From the resourceful libraries of 2D Backfire Master (talk) 11:58, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another Tyrogue Problem 

message: Why don't any of the Pokemon mini-articles ever mention if they are obtainable in Colosseum or XD? You don't need that much detail about it, just to mention their presence as a Snaggable Shadow. 2D Backfire Master (talk) 12:40, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Um... woah. Like déjà vu and stuff..... Totally radical man! -sesuPRIME talk • contribs 13:44, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Just a Thought

message: I thought Mudkip was supposed to have a section on this article! Just because Mudkip has a meme doesn't mean they don't exist even in-universe! True, keeping Mudkip out of existence is one way to avoid mudkipz debates, but you guys are treating Mudkips like they aren't in anything at all! >:(
 19:25, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Some time ago, the number of Pokemon included in each list was changed; as a result, the Mudkip section went to the article titled List of Pokémon (252–280). This means that the talk page notice regarding Mudkipz needs to be moved to the proper location; I'll go ahead and take care of that shortly. --SoCalSuperEagle  (talk) 01:10, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  So, Mudkip doesn't exist at all even in-universe?!