lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Sir William Johnson, 1st Baronet

message: From the article:
:"Sir William Johnson and Catherine Weissenberg were never married and so their son John was illegitimate and should never have inherited the baronetcy. This has now (in 2013) been brought to the attention of the Ministry of Justice at the House of Lords in London by a 5 x great grand daughter of Catherine Weissenberg."
O'Toole, extensively cited in this article, goes into this question of whether or not the couple was legally married. He presented pro and con sides of the topic, but as far as I remember, could not reach a definitive answer with the data at hand. Are you saying that this question has been settled? How so? Thank you, Wordreader (talk) 16:39, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weissenberg & Johnson marriage 

message: O'Toole wrote about Sir William being the inspiration for James Fennimore Cooper's iconic Leatherstocking Tales "Hawkeye" character. As a younger man, Johnson was agile (prior to his gunshot wound), adventurous, had an affinity with the Natives, and traveled throughout the Iroquois lands, dressed in a Bohemian-style mixture of European and Native clothing (as pictured in the West portrait assigned to Guy Johnson, but thought by O'Toole to be of Sir William). If someone has O'Toole's book and can look up the page and wording, I think that this is a fairly significant bit of information. Thank you, Wordreader (talk) 06:02, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hawkeye. 

message: This is a copy taken from the same lost portrait that the info-box etching is copied from, only in delicious color! And due to the Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp. copyright decision, it is ripe for plucking. (I've read that uploading images to WP is very complicated, so I haven't tried to learn how as yet.) http://www.nyhistory.org/exhibit/sir-william-johnson-1715-1774
All the best, Wordreader (talk) 04:37, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Color version of info-box portrait. 
Talk:Ziying of Qin

message: The Chinese Wikipedia offers three theories to Ziying's Family relation with Qin Shihuang, yet it is not present here. Should we translate from there?
:Yes. Better if there are sources, though. — LlywelynII 09:26, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Family Relations

message: I don't think that "handed over" is justified; no traditional historical account has him as "handed over," and it would be sheer speculation to write that.  (See Shi Ji's account at .  It stated simply that Xiang Yu killed him; it said nothing about Liu Bang handing him over.)  --Nlu 13:13, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Check the Book of Han (汉书) where this is accounted in fuller details. All historians agree that he was handed over. Check the Cambridge History of China were this is explained. Liu Bang had promised Zijing that he wouldn't be mistreated, but due to the insistance of Xiangyu he had to relinquish Zijing to Xiangyu who killed him. Hardouin 01:04, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whether he was "handed over" by Liu Bang 

message: Apparently, there's some contention about this, but the article should lead with the name of the article. If you really feel that it should start with "Ying Ziying" or "Ying Ying", come here and get a move approved first. Please bring more stats to justify the move than Nlu did above. Personally, I would support a move to Third Emperor, since that's what he's most famous for, but we'd still need to look at whether that's the name everyone else uses. — LlywelynII 09:43, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Lead

message: There is a photo for ziying on commonos its :File:Ziying (Qin dynasty).png Can you use it in The Article  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moataz zintani (talk • contribs) 10:41, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hi
Talk:Rule of Three (Wicca)

message: Being as this is an article on 'Rule of Three (Wicca)', specifically, I would propose that the section titled "Anthroposophy" does not belong here and should be removed.  It is not relevant Rule of Three (Wicca) and this is not a space for comparison of supposedly similar principles in other works, philosophies, and religions. This article is specifically for the "rule of three" in Wicca.  Being as there is no connection between the article's subject and Anthroposophy, that section should be removed from this article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.67.79.87 (talk) 19:49, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anthroposophy 

message: Where it says "when thou receivest good, so equally art bound to return good threefold" does not seem to say that one will get threefold good return but that one is bound to return/do threefold good. Of course, the English is weird, but this seems to be what it means, not what the article appears to say (skimming). Original author explanation available? Misty MH (talk) 05:15, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct interpretation?
Talk:Alemdar Mustafa Pasha

message: Please add some information about Alemdar Mustfa pasha family, siblings, ancestors, sons, and grandsons.   what happended to them after his death?   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.36.32.33 (talk) 06:54, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Hi Jagatai, just some pointers:
* If you start a paragraph with a space or spaces, then the Wiki software displays the text as if it were a computer program, which is why those shaded boxes and fixed-width font were appearing. There's a good article on markup at Wikipedia:How to edit a page which describes this.
* In the English language, the regnal numbers come after the name of a ruler, not before. So, it's Selim III, not "III. Selim".
* The conventional style in typed English is to place a single space after a punctation mark, so it's like the space after this comma, and not like this one,which leaves no room.
regards,  --BillC 00:59, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some points 

message: Does anyone know if this is the same person referenced by Layard here?--Cdogsimmons (talk) 17:17, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Injeh Bairakdar Mohammed Pasha
Talk:FHA insured loan

message: Should the section of credit history be revised to include the more technical fact that lenders set credit minimums, not the FHA? Source: FHA loans --EricERCC (talk) 18:34, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Credit Minimums

message: I came here hoping to find something about FHA tax credits.  Where in Wikipedia is this topic covered?  --Vaughan Pratt (talk) 21:14, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: FHA tax credits

message: I've removed some of the discussion about Revenue Ruling 2006-27.  Firstly, the ruling most certainly did not label the programs as "scams".  That word was used only by a web site that reported the ruling (the citation to which I also removed).  And second, the ruling did not identify any particular companies.  Instead, it merely described the type of transaction that was being ruled upon.  NewYorkActuary (talk) 21:35, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Down-payment grants
File talk:Sendai, Miyagi Test Map.png

message: Personally, I like the one on the right, it seems the cleanest to me.  Nice to know it's GNU, too.  If we agree, I'll go around and add that to all the MIyagi pages, colored appropriately, of course. :)
Idle note: Perhaps we can use this map to show intraprefectual train lines in Miyagi as well.
-William McDuff 01:19, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Oglebay Park

message: Not that this really adds anything to the article (hence why I'm on the Talk page), but when I was a kid, the thing I remembered most about Oglebay Park was the indoor swimming pool, which had a tropical theme and a (plastic) rock wall with two waterfalls in the kiddie section. I just thought it was the coolest thing. Eventually, they stopped running the waterfalls, but I'm not sure why. --Birdhombre 01:50, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, I didn't mean the pool was at the "park" itself; it was part of the Wilson Lodge, and I think the outdoor pool was right outside the big glass windows. I haven't been there in a few years, so I can't remember exactly. --Birdhombre 17:28, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A large section was pasted in from here and because it violated copyright it has been removed. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 04:46, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio

message: What's the deal with that huge add about the Baka Memorial Golf Tourney? I understand that golf is a huge part of culture at the park , but is there some way we could integrate that into a smaller section? There are MANY sporting events at the park, and if we add a new section for every one, the article will soon have more about sports and less about the park itself. Any suggestions?
Morganismysheltie 03:49, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Golf tournament add?

message: I would like to help make this a better article and get it out of the "Start-class". Any suggestions on how to accomplish this would be appreciated, as would any help. Thanks! Morganismysheltie (talk) 21:17, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improving the article's quality 

message: How much walking is there at the zoo? My husband and I are both handicapped and need to see if we can walk it. 173.218.226.225 (talk) 07:46, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zoo
Talk:Thomson's Translation

message: "Thomson's translation of the entire Greek Bible, excluding the Apocrypha, . . . "  Please, read that statement again and, I believe, you'll see the problem with it, namely, Thomson's work does not represent a translation of the entire LXX.  Please, revise accordingly..Mwidunn (talk) 17:47, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: No, it is not the complete Septuagint

message: : Thompson's was the first English translation of the Septuagint published, and was considered by British biblical scholars to represent the best in American scholarship.
When I read that, I started laughing. In all honesty, I don't know what that means, given that British scholars often had little respect for American scholarship, often for good reasons. Does this mean they gave it grudging respect, but it still wasn't up to British standards? --Prosfilaes 02:03, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Sorry, but I don't understand the statement "It was published in one thousand sets of four volumes each." Does it mean the work is four-thousand-volume long? Or that it was published in sets of four volumes and that they sold one thousand copies? I guess it is the latter case.  Aldo L (talk) 03:17, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Total extension of published work 
Talk:Sisters Minor of Mary Immaculate

message: I did a Google search on the religious congregation and see some material to put together an encyclopediac, NPOV article.
To the person who started this article: Hi.  I see you are a new user.  It's great that you are contributing to Wikipedia, and I'm glad we can work together to create a good encyclopedia article on this religious congregation.
You are new to Wikipedia, so you may be unfamiliar with all of our policies and guidelines.  Some of the more experienced users know more about these policies and guidelines and can help you in writing this article.
One of these things is that articles have to have references.  If you do it in the proper manner, it is fine to say that this order is "abusive physically, spiritually, and mentally, and sexually", as well as neglectful.  But we are writing an encyclopedia article here, so we have to keep that in mind.  Let's say you know of a newspaper or magazine article that talks about how this religious congregation is mentally abusive as well as neglectful.  Then you should tell us about it.  Then the article can say "According to So-and-so Magazine, the Sisters are mentally abusive as well as neglectful.  One example the magazine article gives is John Doe and Jane Doe, who were mentally abused and neglected by the Sisters".  Actually, even what I just wrote is not the best example, the best thing is to give examples.  Like to note exactly what the mentally abusive and neglectful things happened to John and/or Jane Doe that was mentioned in the magazine article.
So that's just an example of how we can build a better article.  Let's work together to do this.  For now, let's leave the initial content you put up in the discussion page. Mr. Know-It-All 02:06, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:Henry W. Grady

message: Is anyone active in this page?
I Have found good material to add to it, and if no one wants to do it I guess that responibility falls on me Gnirts 02:15, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Active?

message: The book I have before me lists his birth as being on May 24, 1850.  The article differs on both the date and the year.  My source is kind of old, but does anyone has any way to explain the discrepancy?  Badbilltucker 21:50, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I vote for your date based on his entry in the New Georgia Encyclopedia.--Roswell native 01:53, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Year of Birth?
Talk:Imaginary (sociology)

message: The article is still full of jargon, and seems like a mash up of book introductions. The language needs to be simplified, and the sources increased. Media studies is also a major area that studies the imaginary, which might deserve a separate article. --StraboVarenius (talk) 00:39, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

message: Imaginary as presented in this article is not limited to sociology but is also major anthropological concept.--BMF81 10:21, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  anthropology 

message: Some, if not most, of what is written would be impossible for laymen to understand.  Take the quote above.  What does "constituting" mean?  what does an "established reality" mean? ie. are there other kinds of reality?  What are "systems of meanings"? can you give  examples?  what does it mean to "represent" this system? --RedHouse18 21:27, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comprehensibility?
Talk:Phillip Aspinall

message: I think I found a RS about his views on same-sex marriage: "In a letter to a member of Australian Marriage Equality Archbishop Aspinall confirms that the Anglican Church continues to believe marriage is the union of a man and a woman. (Letter attached)/ But he also says the Marriage Act already contains religious protections that will continue if one of the three Bills before parliament becomes law./ Archbishops Aspinall stated: “I am advised that the Marriage Act 1961, as it stands, contains adequate protection for religious freedom. In particular, section 47 of the Act provides that a minister of religion is not obliged to solemnize any marriage, and the amendments proposed in the three Bills now before Parliament do not affect this protection.”/ The Archbishop also condemned some of the language used against supporters of marriage equality, and joined Australian Marriage Equality in calls for a respectful debate:/ “I am concerned to promote respectful dialogue among people of diverse views, and I would, of course, eschew any defamatory comments made against supporters of same-sex marriage.” The Most Re’d Dr Phillip Aspinall stated."
In a letter to a member of Australian Marriage Equality Archbishop Aspinall confirms that the Anglican Church continues to believe marriage is the union of a man and a woman. (Letter attached)Mistico (talk) 15:16, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Views on Same-sex Marriage
Talk:Jordan Danger

message: The Photo's have been put in, this article no longer exist unless offers of expandation of this page come to this point.
:?????? I'm a bit confused by what you wrote above.--Azathar 06:19, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds perfectly sound to me, by Wiki standards - indeed his command of English makes me think he's a senior editor of this fine webpedia.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.129.224.141 (talk) 00:25, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why does it list Dirt as a movie? It's a television series? It even links to the Dirt (Tv Series) ?95.96.130.141 (talk) 22:18, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Movie list 

message: I am almost certain that I saw her when i glanced the young and the restless  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.74.196.200 (talk) 01:22, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Why does this site list Jordan Hinson's middle name as "Danger" when other sites (e.g., https://www.tvguide.com/celebrities/jordan-hinson/bio/281721/ and https://www.imdb.com/name/nm1836666/bio?ref_=nm_ov_bio_sm) list her middle name as Danielle?  As of Sept 26, 2018, she was still referring to herself as "Jordan Hinson" (https://www.filminquiry.com/interview-jordan-hinson/).  I know her twitter account has changed to @JordanDanger, but a cursory hunt via Google has yet to explain the name change.  All I know is that referring to her as "Jordan Danger Hinson" is obviously incorrect.  If anyone does happen to know why she changed her name, it would make a good section to this Wiki page. 63.153.99.86 (talk) 05:10, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Danger vs. Danielle
Talk:Kanye West production discography

message: What happen to the song Bittersweet him n john mayer was working on it!?!?!? - 68.163.230.44 18:08, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Bittersweet?

message: Danm it! That song is hard to find. It took me three hours to finally get it. It well worth it. Pacific Coast Highway 23:18, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  This Love 

message: Kanye West didn't produce this, according to the liner notes. What is your source? --FuriousFreddy 16:05, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poppa Was a Player 

message: kanye ghost produced for a lot of joints with D Dot. should those be included? if not, then the fact that he was ghost producing to get his start should be mentioned--Jaysscholar 00:45, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  ghost production 

message: i think i finally got the correct sample. heres my source: http://www.the-breaks.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=12088&highlight=kanye+vegas
--Jaysscholar 00:35, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  family business 

message: does that sample jimmy castor or gino vannelli's "i just wanna stop" they are so similar its hard to tell.--Jaysscholar 20:19, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  we dont care 

message: Can somebody reduce the subheadlines it's too many just bold it--hottie 19:03, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Reduce subheadlines

message: This page doesn't mention Estelle (singer and rapper) anywhere - I thought he had a major input into her upcoming album? -Anthony- (talk) 10:35, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Estelle 

message: Wouldn't it be best if all of this information is sourced? Because on the category, it has tracks that I don't think they were announced at all. Like Timbaland's production discography, the section of upcoming releases has sources to some of the artists. I'll remove the information with as far as I know to fit this idea in there. Version before my edit:  --Esanchez(Talk 2 me or Sign here) 00:01, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  2. Speculated Upcoming Projects 

message: Doesn't seem to be a count of how many songs he's made. Should be added in the top bit. Apologies, just a regular user, not sure the exact manner these edits should be made.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ethanbyrne (talk • contribs) 20:36, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Total discography count?
Talk:Hatfield Quality Meats

message: This seems like a clear example of company adveritsing and only very limited as a contribution to the database of neutrally-presented information that is wikipedia
:As one of the main contributors to this page, I would like to know what you think makes this page advertising. If you see things that are POV, please change them. I will be the first to admit that this is my family's company, but the article didn't exist, and it is a noteworthy company, so I created it. If you know more that you'd like to contribute, by all means, please do. MicahMN | Talk 14:36, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Town square

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: no consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover) – MaterialWorks 21:49, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Town square →  – A town square is a particular type of square. The scope of the current article appears to cover squares in general; hence, the current article title may not be appropriate. WikiEditor50 (talk) 01:51, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Architecture has been notified of this discussion. - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 02:36, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Urban studies and planning has been notified of this discussion. - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 02:36, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 21 July 2023
Talk:List of Billboard Hot 100 top-ten singles in 2004

message: Please see BillBoard's methodology for determining the rankings. I don't feel as though there is anything subjective in their rankings, meaning they can't really claim copyright on the rankings themselves since it is strictly statistical information. Hersfold (t/a/c) 19:29, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright 
Talk:Jason West

message: I'm worried about this article- it's poorly written and seems to have almost no sources for information that really isn't relavant to a biographical article. I'm going to remove a lot of information that's unsourced, and try to add where I can with information from the New Paltz wiki, WikiPaltz. But I don't think the edit war over his page there is relevant to his page here, because from what I remember he wasn't any of the people engaged in the edit war. But somebody who's read his book and/or has more information on him should probably edit. Nicole Javaly 21:20, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Nadi

message: Howdy All. This poor page has seen a lot of smoke without a lot of major contributions. As a former Nadi-an (and occasional Wikipedian) I wanted to do something to give the props to the old hometown. I'd like to hope that any expansions done have more pure info & photos of the lovely place. Some of the edits looked like it was being cut apart for no particular reason. I'd love to see it grown with love. Many thanks to those who have kept it clean & swept. TJ 04:08, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: () 
What's going on with this pronunciation, particularly the space in the middle? Can anyone confirm how htis placename is pronounced? Flapdragon 12:18, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see the Fijian language article for details.  The /t/, /d/, and /q/ are pronounced with a preceding nasal consonant, which is not written.  The space in the middle is to show where the syllables break. You could also consult User:Xorkl000, a native Fijian.  David Cannon 20:26, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 

message: I think that we will require disambiguation page for this. As Nadi may have multiple meanings. I am able to find out two meanings. 1) Nadi pariksha and 2) Nadi, Fiji.I am not aware as how to create disambiguation page. I am will try to learn it. In the meanwhile may I request people who know about it to help? Thanks in advance. --Abhijeet Safai (talk) 12:00, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation page needed? 
Talk:Mainau

message: The owner of the island is the Swedish Count Bernadotte - which nation holds sovreignty?  Nik42 04:11, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It's worth noting he was (dead now, it needs updating. However I believe it's still his estate) a former Swedish prince. He lost his priviliges due to marrying a commoner. The count title is actually from Luxembourg. In any case, yes: The island is German from what I've heard. --BluePlatypus 21:08, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled