Wikipedia talk:Indic transliteration

message: Dear Wikipedians,
We apreciate your valuable contribution in article named Wikipedia:Indic transliteration scheme on english WIkipedia.
We at Marathi Language wikipedia do not have enough expertise to update IPA related info in our article, specialy we have been unable to import/update IPA templates and do not know how to use IPA symbols.Please click here-this link- to provide help to update "IPA transliteration for Indic Languages" article for  Marathi wikipedia
We seek and request for help in updating above mentioned article and would like to know relevant resources and refferences in respect of Devanagari and IPA .
Thanks and Regards
Mahitgar 16:08, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Seeking help and contribution

message: I was wondering about the Devanagri character य़. If its phonetical value is really the same as the undotted version's, then what use does it serve? Sephia karta 03:26, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: To whoever added that last explanation: In which language is य़ pronounced like [ʒ]? I've never heard anything like this in any language that uses Devanagari, but I would love to know of it if there is one. As far as I know, this letter is simply the Devanagari equivalent of Bengali-Assamese য়, which is used to mark hiatus between vowels, or to mark [e] when in coda position. This is different from the Bengali-Assamese য, which is pronounced [dʒ] or [z] depending on the language, dialect, and speaker. --SameerKhan 07:33, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  य़? 

message: We have run into a situation in Hindi-Urdu where words from the two registers are being compared by taking examples of formal Hindi and formal Urdu. This would be fine except that the two are written in different scripts. If different transliteration techniques are applied, simple words like hain (हैं, ہیں) show up in differing forms (haiṃ, haiṉ). This actually hurts the purpose of the comparison. So, there is a critical need to define a guideline that requires the comparison of two Indic languages to conform to the same transliteration/transcription technique such that words identical to the two languages be rendered similarly in order to facilitate proper comparisons. Opinions on this are invited. --Hunnjazal (talk) 04:02, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Common transliteration to compare vocabularies and wording

message: There is a short vowel known as saṁvr̥tōkāram (Malayalam: സംവൃതോകാരം), or kuṯṯiyal ukaram (Malayalam: കുറ്റിയൽ ഉകരം) in Malayalam and kuṟṟiyal ukaram in Tamil, represented in ISO 15919 by ŭ; in the former, this short vowel is represented, instead of the virama, by the candrakkala depending on the context. This character is missing from the guide. Also missing is the visarga, represented by ḥ. I would have added these two characters, but I do not know which section to add it to.
Reference: 
--Joshua Issac (talk) 12:36, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vowel ŭ 

message: Should we move the "Wiki" system for Bengali transcription (see Talk:Bengali alphabet#Romanization issues among other places for discussion, and (past versions and talk page of) Romanisation of Bengali) be moved onto this page, or a subpage?  There is controversy regarding its OR status, but at least the spirit of WP:OR#Translations and transcriptions might allow for such schemes.  ʙʌsʌwʌʟʌ тʌʟк 22:42, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I needed to find a good romanization for Bengali that deals with the inherent vowels legibly (as opposed to a strict Indic transliteration). I had hoped that the community would have accepted one for use on the Wikipedia and was surprised to see no consensus list. But is the Romanization used in Wiki articles regularly this one? -- Evertype·✆ 18:49, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bengali transliteration/transcription 

message: I made the following changes to put down the phonetic values and transcription for the Assamese letter  (besides a minor correction in the Devanagari column). Chaipau (talk) 07:45, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assamese letter ক্ষ 

message: As per the my understanding of whats mentioned here Wikipedia:Indic transliteration the word रघुवंशी becomes Raghuvanshi. What are your views on this.
I have tried the same in google translate which also follows transliteration I got the same result.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Neha.thakur75 (talk • contribs) 17:54, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The relevant discussion is underway at :Talk:Raghuvamshi. General Ization Talk   18:13, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transliteration of रघुवंशी  

message: Transliteration scheme using apostohe to differentiate 
. Vowels
a a' i i' u u' e e' ai o o' au m' : r'
most confusion occurs in long and short vowels
consonants
k kh g gh ( * )
c ch j jh    (* )
t th d dh n'
t' t'h d' d'h n
p f b bh m
y r l l' v
s' sh s h'
___________
notes
* not decided
l' ళ  ( finds use in telugu and marathi)
r' ఋ  ( r as in rishi  r'shi)
n' ణ    ( as n in krishna kr'shn'a)
s'  శ    ( as s in sri s'ri' )
sh ష   (  as sh in bhaasha bha'sha)
h' హ  ( as h in hari  h'ari)
t' త  ( as th in thatha t'a't'a)
th ఠ ( as th  in pujapaath pu'ja'pa'th)
m'    nasal as in chand  ca'm'd'  
Suggestions hopefully useful for proper pronunciation of romanised indic wotds. 183.82.235.2 (talk) 15:34, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  simplified scheme suggested