lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Vladimir Golenishchev

message: The article mentions Golenishchev's time at university, but does not specify which years he was there or what he studied. Did he specifically study Egypt, or a broader range of history? Jadrzd (talk) 17:40, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Years attended university and topic of study? 

message: Are there any sources that can be found that we can link to in his life section as currently there isn't a single citation in that entire section. Also is there a way to update source 2 as the link no longer works.
MatthewAYoung (talk) 17:40, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Matthew! I have added a few more sources that include information on his family life. I will look into source 2 to see if it can be updated. Alohr77 (talk) 17:35, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Finding Sources 

message: — Assignment last updated by K8shep (talk) 16:15, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: History of Science

message: Hi! In the next few weeks I will be adding information and making changes to the main article. I have been exploring multiple sources and plan to slightly restructure the main page. Alohr77 (talk) 16:23, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I will also be doing the same throughout the article Bdesmond01 (talk) 16:29, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding information to the main page
Talk:Digital sampling

message: This article starts off defining the basic process of digital sampling, fundamental to digital audio and video, but then goes on to talk about 'sampling' in the sense of taking music samples.
Perhaps it would be better to split off Sampling (music) for the latter. --Lindosland 14:38, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sampling (music) article 

message: The link to Sampling (music) seemed off-topic, leading to a different subject than what someone who reads this article would want. Is this better? I've changed it to a disambig up top, which is admittedly more intrusive. I'm also not sure I've used the correct terms. --edgarde 16:18, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  disambig / See Also linkage 

message: Much of what was written here about quality being limited by sample rate was jsut plain wrong, and served to propogate a common misunderstanding that is being used to market 'Hi resolution' audio.  I intend to expand this article to properly cover that issue and others relating to the basic sampling process. --86.135.221.168 15:04, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  sample rate 

message: I've added some information about these subjects.
By the way, I've removed the word "amplitude" from the very first sentence, because, to my opinion, it was not very correctly used (an amplitude is not a signal itself, but rather an absolute value of the signal's complex envelope).
Ring0 17:25, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sampling theorem and Anti-aliasing filters
Talk:Tschaikowsky (and Other Russians)

message: I don't think it's true that no accompaniment was written for this song; I've been in a production of Lady in the Dark and this song certainly had accompaniment in our score (as well as notes written for the melody); and I have several recordings of the song, including one by Danny Kaye, in which accompaniment is played.  AJD 14:39, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

message: So, if the title of the song is "Tschaikowsky (and Other Russians)", and we go to the trouble of pointing out that Gershwin used the "Tschaikowsky" spelling instead of the more usual "Tchaikovsky" - then, why is the article titled simply "Tchaikovsky", in apparent flagrant contravention of this?  Not even "Tchaikovsky (and Other Russians)", just "Tchaikovsky".  
If it's usually referred as just "Tchaikovsky", and with that exact spelling, we need (a) to make that fact explicit, and (b) a citation for it.  --  Jack of Oz [your turn] 06:11, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree should be moved to Ira's full title "Tschaikowsky (and Other Russians)". --Mervyn (talk) 11:23, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Article title
Talk:Royal Victoria Dock

message: The first sentence of History states "The Royal Victoria Docks are 14 kilometres (8.7 mi) from London Bridge, and 36 kilometres (22 mi) from Gravesend". This is presumably meant to be the distance by River, as the Royal Victoria Dock is definitely not that straight line distance from either of these two points (more like 7 km and 25 km respectively); however, the distances given do not appear to correspond to a reasonable measure by River either - both are overstated. Does anyone have the book cited, to confirm? --DavidCane (talk) 21:02, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Distances from London Bridge and Gravesend
Talk:Church service

message: This article needs expansion. Some ideas someone can start with:
* Describes types of major types of church services in detail such as those of Catholic, evangelical, Pentecostal, Jehovah Witness, Quackier, Mormon, and other churches. 
* Discuss the employment of singing as a part of many church services including the use Gospel choirs.
* Some info on statistics regarding attendance at services would be nice. Also their have been various articles discussing why attendance levels have risen or fallen. Also their should be surveys available that would indicate why some people who identify as Christian don't go to church on a regular basis. 
* Discuss the special services that many churches offer on special religious holidays such a the Catholic "Midnight Mass" or the Eastern Orthodox alliterate Easter program. 
* Some churches operate out of people's home. Discuss how their program varies in contrast to traditional churches with pews and an alter.
--Cab88 14:53, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Service of worship should be merged here. --JFH (talk) 21:03, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge discussion 

message: There is no basis for differentiating evangelical worship services from worship services in other branches of Christianity. Evangelical worship services have no distinctive characteristics, and the variation of worship services within Evangelicalism is similar to the variation of worship services within Christianity in general. Daask (talk) 23:18, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: User:Daask, I agree with you have said here and support the merger of Worship service (evangelicalism) into this article. The article on Worship service (evangelicalism) seems to be related mainly to worship in contemporary megachurches rather than even properly covering worship in evangelical churches, which may range from Anglican to Baptist to Methodist to Plymouth Brethren, etc. I hope this helps. With regards, AnupamTalk 03:06, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Worship service (evangelicalism)]] into [[Church service]] 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Public worship and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 17#Public worship until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  signed, Rosguill talk 17:21, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Public worship" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Guiding Light (1937–1949)

message: I have recently found on-line via both the Internet Archive from the Library of Congress and a website entitled American Radio History via a magazine that was in use for quite some years, Radio Mirror, and some more information for the story lines for The Guiding Light from the radio years, including the years 1937 to 1949.  Much of what is written is from Irna Phillips herself, in a novel format, and it looks as though the story line information from 1937 to the end of 1940 is fairly well intact (it becomes bit spotty afterwards, but I can find some more information other places.)  I won't mind quoting the resources and some of these resources would also help in clarifying some backstage comings and goings and issues during that time period.  Including the fact NBC cancelled the series twice (the third time brought back by CBS), change in sponsorship, and then back, and for a time part of The General Mills Hour, where stories got interwoven by Phillips with stories and characters on her other two serials Today's Children and Woman in White.  So, I am wondering if people would be interested in me, starting with this time period, and hopefully moving forward all the way at least into the 1990's with improving the story line summaries and the what was going on backstage or behind the scenes?  I would also like to start to do something, starting with this time period, moving forward, in the summaries that I would want to seek approval to do so (don't know if others writing about other serials might pick this up) that I saw in writings of a book about soaps in the 1970's of introducing new characters by having their names written in all caps?  Example:  Such as introducing characters as:  MARY RUTHLEDGE.  
--Petjbr03 (talk) 02:05, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Dates
Talk:Guiding Light (1950–1959)

message: Please correct the error in this section. GL began Television broadcasts in January  25 1952 (55 years ago today in fact) 
Please do not link individual years, per Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_%28dates_and_numbers%29#Date_formatting and WP:CONTEXT. The exception is if the year is from a different decade than the previous article, for example referencing something which happened in the previous or next decade. Then, the year should be piped to the appropriate article:
 1962
KillerChihuahua?!? 14:54, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Dates

message: Fascinating info here, but NONE of it has a source. Anyone know where this info about Irna & the color episodes, and Irna being asked to combine GL and SFT...where is that all from? 2601:241:8103:C79D:98B5:A186:6AFC:E98D (talk) 15:58, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations 

message: Plot development sections for TGL in each decade are long, poorly written, and riddled with bad grammar, and impossible to read run-on sentences. I took a hard brush to all 4,628 words of this section and came back with a respectable 4,206. While it is possible to cut more, I'm not sure we should. For one, this is attempting to summarize 10 years of plot development for a show that has been poorly preserved given its place in history. Any details cut here may end up lost forever. I'm not even clear on the source of this original plot summary as it seems to have been written almost stream of consciousness from someone's memory.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xedrix (talk • contribs) 17:18, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I have scripts for all episodes from 1952 to 1959. I could do a proper summary. If you could give me guidelines on word count and maybe go over it for me to see if it is appropriate. 121.200.7.156 (talk) 08:04, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

text: Also everything up to the line "On a date with Bob Lang" happens previous to the television show. The first weeks has Meta in New York with Trudy after a separation with Joe. Kathy moving out and Bill also in New York over seeing Gloria's tv show. 121.200.7.156 (talk) 08:58, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot Development Rewrite 

message: Many errors here. I have scripts of the show from 1952 - 1959 and much of this information needs to be corrected. 
Rev. Dr. Paul Keeler did not appear on the television version until January 12, 1953 played by Melville Ruick. Ed Begley was never on the television show but the radio show only. I have deleted his credit.
I have added dates where possible for other characters. Many listed under the original cast were not there the first week of the television show. 121.200.7.156 (talk) 08:03, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Characters
Talk:Guiding Light (1960–1969)

message: Please do not link individual years, per Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_%28dates_and_numbers%29#Date_formatting and WP:CONTEXT. The exception is if the year is from a different decade than the previous article, for example referencing something which happened in the previous or next decade. Then, the year should be piped to the appropriate article:
 1952
KillerChihuahua?!? 14:54, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Dates
Talk:Justin King (guitarist)

message: Does anyone here know what the deal is with the song "Change?"  As far as I can tell, it's not on any of the albums listed here, but he's done a video for it (as I'm sure every fan knows) and it gets quite a lot of google and youtube attention.  Can someone who knows the story here update the page to reflect any info on it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.255.179.119 (talk) 00:28, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The song "Change" first appears on the "Bright and Dirty Lights" EP. And given that the video shows James West, it was recorded sometime during or before 2005. I'm not sure what more of a story there would be other than they clearly posted it online to get attention for the band. -- Scott Dial (talk) 01:01, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Change" 
Talk:Guiding Light (1980–1989)

message: Please do not link individual years, per Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_%28dates_and_numbers%29#Date_formatting and WP:CONTEXT. The exception is if the year is from a different decade than the previous article, for example referencing something which happened in the previous or next decade. Then, the year should be piped to the appropriate article:
 1972
KillerChihuahua?!? 14:55, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Dates
Talk:Guiding Light (1990–1999)

message: Please do not link individual years, per Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_%28dates_and_numbers%29#Date_formatting and WP:CONTEXT. The exception is if the year is from a different decade than the previous article, for example referencing something which happened in the previous or next decade. Then, the year should be piped to the appropriate article:
 1982
KillerChihuahua?!? 14:56, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Dates
Talk:Guiding Light (2000–2009)

message: Please do not link individual years, per Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_%28dates_and_numbers%29#Date_formatting and WP:CONTEXT. The exception is if the year is from a different decade than the previous article, for example referencing something which happened in the previous or next decade. Then, the year should be piped to the appropriate article:
 1992
KillerChihuahua?!? 14:56, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Dates

message: And yet again someone copied the list from SOAP OPERA DIGEST. Don't do it, people. Its a copyright violation, and it does not present the information in encyclopedic format. Add and edit, but DO NOT USE the Current, Recurring, Coming and Going format. Do not cheat and copyvio paste from Soap Opera Digest or from any other site. KillerChihuahua?!? 03:04, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cast

message: So is someone ever going to put a non-SOD cast list up?
EDIT: Fine, I'll do it myself!—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.64.64.130 (talk • contribs) 22:17, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It was there until someone vandalized the article here. KillerChihuahua?!? 02:04, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The invisible cast 

message: First of all I love the new look of the show.I would like to know more about the town you are filming in. And I would like to now about the mansion and the grounds arround it its so beautiful.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.4.90.121 (talk) 17:52, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The real world 

message: Guiding Light (2000–present) should be Guiding Light (2000–2009)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.169.161.1 (talk) 16:40, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: title
Talk:Lloyd's List

message: I have removed the merger suggestion from this page. As one of the longest continuously published newspapers in the world, Lloyd's List should not be merged into an article about a company that was created less than ten years ago. It woulf be like merging 'yoghurt' into 'Danone'. CanadrianUK (talk) 10:37, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Lloyd's List deserves its own entry

message: The title is now Lloyds List. But the paper's heading says: 'Lloyd's List'. This being alseo the right way of speling, innit, I suggest to change the title into Lloyd's List. It takes a swapping, since the suggested new title is now a redirect. -DePiep 14:56, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Title correction

message: User:Btball has tagged this page to be merged with Informa because that is now the parent company.  Considering Lloyd's List has a very long and distinguished history, and still operates under its own name, I see no reason for a merger. That would be like merging Vought with Carlyle Group just because they were bought out.  And even if there was a name change, Lloyd's List is still notable for its history, just like there is a separate Lockheed article from Lockheed Martin. Joshdboz (talk) 19:41, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree, merge disapproved. We don't do by owner DePiep (talk) 16:42, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: --— Safety Cap (talk) 16:22, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox request
Talk:Al Batinah Region

message: elaborated the article with info abt wilayats.Bharatveer 05:45, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ad Dakhiliyah Governorate

message: I have listed the wilayats of the region.Bharatveer 05:25, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I used your list, as well as other sources, to create a navbox. — Jdcollins13 (talk) 18:57, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: New section
Talk:Ellie Lambeti

message: Lots of red links.  Article would benefit from help with someone more familiar with the topic or with transliteration issues in general.  Some of these links may just be transliteration problems. Csari 15:09, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Faisal bin Turki, Sultan of Muscat and Oman

message: Sayyid and Sayyida are the correct official titles for the Omani royalties. They are the equivalents of prince/princess, duke/duchess, etc. The down link bellow redirects to the page of the council of minister in Oman on the official website of the Omani news agency (ONA). You can obviously view that the deputy prime minister (who's a member of the royal family) is entitled (H.H Sayyid Fahd bin Mahmoud al-Said). The same thing is indicated with the next two individuals from the council and the fifth and sixth as well.
http://omannews.gov.om/en/web/ona/the-council-of-minister  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.98.114.159 (talk) 07:43, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sayyid/Sayyida not Sheikh/Sheikha!
Talk:Ad Dhahirah North Governorate

message: I have listed the wilayats with some info on regional center.Bharatveer 06:05, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Are Ad Dhahirah, Az̧ Z̧āhirah and Adh Dhahirah just different spellings of the same name?  Are they used in different situations?   Could someone clarify, please?  Thanks! --Mpwrmnt 08:51, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Different spellings, same region?
Talk:Musandam Governorate

message: I have corrected the Area and Population figures (1993 census) . I have elaborated on the administrative divisions. Bharatveer 04:52, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Area and Population figures

message: I read somewhere that the Musandam penninsular was the site of an old British telegraph relay station, which was so "off the beaten track", and extremely hot, that people sent there went "Round the bend" or insane, the origin of this term. Any further info would be welcomed, please contact Steve.Owad-Jones@oilsearch.com.au
:I don't know whether you are still reading there, but this refers to Telegraph Island a little off the shore. I took a picture which is on commons at . -- Arcimboldo (talk) 04:28, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Old British telegraph relay station

message: The map shows Musandam as an island and not as a peninsula. Can someone please correct the map; I do not know how to do it.--Genossegerd (talk) 13:28, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've forwarded a request (for UAE border outlines) to the original creator of the map.  Perhaps a request at WP:WikiProject_Maps may be in order as well. -- ToE 04:58, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, I am sorry for the confusion. I thought at the time that drawing it so would make it better. I guess I was wrong. I will try to Fix the map asap. --Tarawneh (talk) 11:07, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map 

message: Musandam Governorate is mostly the Omani part of the Musandam Peninsula, not the peninsula itself. Part of the peninsula is ruled by the United Arab Emirates. Leo1pard (talk) 09:52, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why I separated ''Musandam Peninsula'' from ''Musandam Governorate''
Talk:PhilSports Stadium stampede

message: Just suggesting a few questions for the article. Some may already be answered, and some do not really need to be answered, at least for now.
*Who owns/operates/maintains the PhilSports Complex? Is it private? If yes, who is involved? Is it the government? If yes, which department or agency is involved? 
*When was the last upgrade of the facility? Was the facility good enough for the event, or just the best choice in a list of not so good facilities? Is there an inherent flaw in the design of the area? If yes, what did the facility management do to remove the flaws?
*How did the event organizers and facility management respond to the accident? How did the emergency response units respond to the accident? 
*What are the efforts of all the parties (public, private, and welfare groups) involved in minimizing the risk of such accidents from happening again? What is the "state of the nation", regarding the country's other like designed and built facilities? Are there any other facilities like PhilSports Complex? Are there any safety hazards in other facilities? If yes, what is being done?
--Noypi380 17:21, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Questions

message: Most media outlets cited a group of boys screaming "BOMBS!" as to the cause of the stampede. Maybe we could try and source and add it? Julz the wizkid 02:59, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bomb 

message: In the 2007 edition of Guinness World Records, the incident was cited as "the greatest death toll in a game show".
Please PINPOINT the article of Guinness World Records about this. I don't read books. If it can only be found in books, please state the page and the 'chapter'.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Triadwarfare (talk • contribs) 12:22, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please indicate sources 

message: This page says 74 deaths, but the 2006 article says 61. Which one is it? --66.67.187.203 19:45, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  which article says 63? all of the articles i see in this article say either 73 or 74. I am going to change the total to 73 since that is what the article used as a cite for the total casualty count says harlock_jds 19:50, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistent 

message: I'll move this to PhilSports Field stampede in a few days unless someone objects since PhilSports Arena specifically refers to the basketball indoor arena, not on the football field outdoors. --Howard the Duck 09:09, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move 

message: The Daily Inquirer issues released right after the stampede might give more info. I don't have time to read all the articles but please do include new info. 
February 5th https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=83UE6yvegO4C&dat=20060205&printsec=frontpage&hl=en
February 6th https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=83UE6yvegO4C&dat=20060206&printsec=frontpage&hl=en Septembertank (talk) 01:46, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add more sources.