lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Timbaland & Magoo

message: Got some actual interviews WITH Melvin, credible. One is a video interview. Should start a new page on him.
*Where are the sources? Niteshift36 (talk) 02:50, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: *Those are copyright violations. Niteshift36 (talk) 05:20, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: *Doesn't matter. Niteshift36 (talk) 00:41, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

text: *Trivial mentions don't make him notable. Aside from the duo, he's non-notable. Niteshift36 (talk) 00:44, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: *Again, so? Nobody said he isn't a producer. Being a producer doesn't make him notable. Significant coverage from reliable third party sources does that. Being on a list or myspace mention isn't significant third party coverage. Niteshift36 (talk) 15:28, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Urubamba (band)

message: Is there any substantive difference between this group and Los Incas other than a name change? If not, we ought to merge these articles. --GentlemanGhost (talk) 19:12, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I think they should be merged. Same band, just changed its name and then back again. Los Incas was the once and future name, so I think that should be the title. --Allen (talk) 01:36, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

text: It doesn't seem different enough from Los Incas to stand on its own to me. It mostly repeats stuff from that article, and anything not from there could improve it by being merged into it. A lot of sources I've seen seem treat them separately though, I don't really get why. --Jessietail (talk) 10:10, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge?
Talk:Vale of Atholl Pipe Band

message: For a considerable period this band performed under the title of ScotRail Vale of Atholl Pipe Band. Should a list of the various names (and corresponding dates) used be included in the article. Lavateraguy (talk) 17:37, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep - if you can get the info that would be great! Ostrichyearning (talk) 00:32, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: It's on the band's web site, but not precisely enough stated. Lavateraguy (talk) 09:21, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Titles
Talk:MULTICOM

message: I'm having trouble finding sources for this, due to other uses of the term, although I've seen it used in the ATC context. What's the difference between MULTICOM and UNICOM? --MCB (talk) 08:17, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources? 

message: I'll get to the information I found in Jeppesen's Private Pilot Manual in a bit.
Google "Aeronautical Information Manual."  For those non-pilots out there, that's commonly known as the back half of the FAR/AIM publication.  It's the collection of the things the FAA thinks pilots should know/do.  It'll be there.
What I find in my old flying textbook is this:  A UNICOM is a privately owned frequency.  The FAA has about a dozen frequencies it issues, and airports pay to use one.  At controlled airports, the UNICOM frequency is monitored by the FBOs on the field, so you can call and order gas or whatnot.
Most of the times you call a UNICOM, you're dealing with an uncontrolled airport.  The FBOs on the field will often monitor the UNICOM, but not always.  At an uncontrolled airport, the UNICOM frequency is the CTAF and pilots use self-announce procedures.  The UNICOM frequency for an airport can be found on sectional charts and in the AF/D.
MULTICOM is a single frequency, 122.9 MHz.  Some small, infrequently trafficked airports don't pay for a UNICOM frequency.  In such a case, you self-announce on the MULTICOM frequency, being sure to begin and end your transmissions with the name of the airport you're "calling."
MULTICOM isn't monitored by anyone on the ground usually.
This next bit is from personal experience
UNICOMs at uncontrolled airports have two functions:  for pilots to talk to eachother, and for pilots to talk to the FBO.  I typically phrase messages two different ways depending on who I'm calling:
When calling the FBO on a UNICOM, I'll say "Pinehurst UNICOM, Cessna...."  When calling other aircraft, I'll say "Pinehurst Traffic, Cessna..."
I'll always call a MULTICOM using the "Carthage Traffic, Piper..." phraseology.  I've heard other pilots doing that, and that's what I do.  From what I recall, that isn't contrary to the FAR/AIM.
Abowers87 (talk) 04:52, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Try a print source
Talk:Vanguard Cadets Drum and Bugle Corps

message: I would like to add a Shows by Year section and spruce up the page. Maybe add some pictures. Thoughts? Suggestions? Cheesewiz285 (talk) 19:12, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Updating/Adding sections to this page
Talk:American Piano Company

message: The link given for "the actual Ampico site" redirects to http://bibliquest.org/. I have deleted it.
The case history at 
http://www.pianolasociety.com/ampico.pdf
seems to document the company's demise, as part of the general consolidation of piano companies as described at the Pianola Institute link given in the preceding section.
Bn (talk) 03:28, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spam link
Talk:Eagles Postgame Live

message: I don't care what the final score may turn out to be.It is time to change Q backs and coaches. What Laurie is putting out on field is an embarassment!!!
Before we change QB, remember this battle cry from the past. "Better to risk with Liske, than conced with Snead".
   Easy Joe, Lansdale, Pa  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.151.62.183 (talk) 01:15, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Michael Echanis

message: There's no verifiable support for him being SF or Ranger, and a rank of E4 at discharge would suggest he was not SF.Mzmadmike (talk) 07:16, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Military qualifications 

message: I believe the current article's content is concise, accurate and easy to read.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Magmaster (talk • contribs) 01:45, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Working on it. An old friend of the subject added a lot of detail, perhaps too much. I'm cleaning it up as I can.--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 14:34, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

text: That is a true compliment from you, sir. I grew up reading your articles.--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 04:27, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article 

message: As the result of a fully documented recommendation packet presented to Black Belt Magazine by Greg Walker with the direct assistance and support of the Echanis Family, Michael D. Echanis was selected as the publication's Weapons Instructor of the Year (2013).  Formal announcement of induction will appear in Black Belt Magazine's December 2013 / January 2014 issue.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Magmaster (talk • contribs) 01:56, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Black Belt Magazine Hall of Fame Induction 

message: If he designed the Warrior Knife, why don't we have references to support this in the Warrior Knife article? – S. Rich (talk) 23:28, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: See references 2 and 3 in the design section in that article.--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 00:47, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. I missed his name in the last sentence.  – S. Rich (talk) 01:34, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Warrior Knife
Talk:Dallas Arbiter

message: Dallas Arbiter Ltd,
Sound City,
124 Shaftesbury Ave,
London W1.
*Fender
*Hayman
*Jedson
*Martin Coletti
*Torre
*Sound City
217.248.67.64 (talk) 14:02, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Address & Brands 1972
Talk:Henry Hunter (RAF officer)

message: I read a mention of a record flight of Hunter Brothers who stayed in the air for 23 days, being supplied food and fuel by other planes. Were these Henry and Thomas? --Ikar.us (talk) 15:46, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  23 day flight
Talk:Wilhelm Schimmel

message: The sentence "high quality concert grand pianos", even when sourced, is highly unnencyclopedic and it should be removed. --Karljoos (talk) 22:53, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Unsourced claim deleted - it only took eight and a half years...! JezGrove (talk) 00:28, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV

message: Are the claims that "The company is now fully owned by the Schimmel family" and "In January 2016, the Chinese Pearl River Piano Group took over 90% of the shares of Schimmel" contradictory? JezGrove (talk) 23:30, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the "fully owned" sentence and added a better reference for the 90% ownership. IGTaylor (talk) 22:33, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ownership
Talk:National Youth Theatre Company

message: As the Musical Director of NYTC I can say categorically that we will not be performing High School Musical 2 next year - the fact that it isn't available as a musical at all being the main reason for this.  So please stop editing this page to say that we are - as soon as we have selected a show, I'll update the page to let everyone know what it is.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.109.198.34 (talk) 23:37, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Prince Music Theater

message: I'm going there on Monday to see Toy Story 3 as per their website. I updated the article to indicate this.
-- User:Paulproteus.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.247.133.24 (talk) 12:56, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  It's still open 

message: Sadly, several persons who choose to remain anonymous have continually removed information from this article and added their own biased text filled with hyperbole. I am now trying to add objective, factual information with external references and citations so that this page can reflect the history and accomplishments of this theater company without bias. Perhaps that goal - in and of itself - reflects a bias? Nleekath (talk) 21:55, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trying to get to the truth of the matter 

message: As of May 2012, the Prince Music Theater has quite a bit of activity scheduled for the coming months. And it is most definitely still open. Nleekath (talk) 21:56, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  And yes, it's still open!
Talk:After the Storm (EP)

message: This album is not independently notable, and even if it was, WP:NALBUM recommends merging to the artist page when articles are unlikely to grow beyond a stub. Skeletor3000 (talk) 17:43, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect
Talk:American Choral Directors Association

message: I added the section . There are currently three composers which don't have an article yet: 
* Theron Kirk
* James Mulholland (composer) (His middle name is Quitman, but article name should not contain middle name per WP:MIDDLENAME, as it is not the most common format.)
* David Brunner (composer)
— Sebastian 06:11, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brock Commission 
Talk:Americana Music Association

message: This popped up as a suggested article to improve and it was in dire need of improvement. Most of the content was copied and pasted from the organisation's website. I've done an initial series of edits to remove that, but will carry on working on the article as it needs more doing, prob re-structuring too. Editing84 (talk) 11:22, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I have now removed the advert tag as the article has been improved a lot- with all the website originated content having been stripped out and the tone made much more neutral. Some other unsourced content also removed. It can still be improved but I no longer think the advert tag is necessary- please feel free to respond if you feel differently though! Editing84 (talk) 14:08, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Working on improving this article
Talk:American Association of Independent Music

message: The correct acronym is AIM right? Check musicindie.org 71.232.117.10 (talk) 02:09, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It should be A2IM. Gobonobo T C 21:38, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Acronym

message: Tagged for cleanup as the article reads too much as a PR piece. It even had a contact telephone in the body of the article! gidonb (talk) 01:56, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: In the Nick Lowe entry it says the association had a representative who testified to Congress about copyright. This entry should describe the association’s position on copyright. Nicmart (talk) 20:09, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright
Talk:Ulch people

message: Shouldn't this be "Ulches"? That would be the usual way to pluralize "Ulch" in English. 75.135.82.119 06:05, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: My Ainu: Spirit of a Northern People by Fitzhugh, William , Durbreuil (1999) book labels them as Ulchi. We have the same problem with the Oroks and Nivkhs (o'c my book calls them Nivkhi). They should probably be Nivkh people, so perhaps Ulch people would be better like the Ainu people and many other ethno articles. -Kain Nihil 07:47, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Also my Siberia: Worlds Apart by Mote, Victor L. (1998) calls them Ul'chi. -Kain Nihil 08:03, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd say Ulchi and Nivkhi are simply romanizations of corresponding Russian terms "" and "", which are plural of "" (ulch) and "" (nivkh).  Renaming the articles to "Ulch people" and "Nivkh people" should take care of the problem of pluralizing the terms in English and is a reasonable proposal.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 17:00, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Plural form
Talk:Canadian Amateur Musicians/Musiciens Amateurs du Canada

message: Noticed this article was moved in 2007 from the previous name "Cammac" to Canadian Amateur Musicians, putative reason given was policy on acronyms. Haven't been able to find the relevant policy, but I gather article names are supposed to use the most common English name. Would think therefore Cammac is the better name since this is what the organization uses to refer to itself, and how others speak about it. Failing that, "Canadian Amateur Musicians / Musiciens Amateurs du Canada", since the bilingual nature of the name is an integral part of the philosophy of the organization. Any objections if I move it back to "Cammac"? Martinp (talk) 15:10, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds good. Matches what is at , which is about as a reliable a source as you can get. Also matches, . Martinp (talk) 08:50, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. I would have thought "Cammac" would be better, but the MOS (Manual of style) frowns on acronyms. There are redirects. Martinp (talk) 08:54, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move from Cammac 

message: I don't know if CAMMAC still has an Ontario connection.  See CAMMAC website and the fact that CAMMAC Ontario Music Centre has been renamed Lake Field Music.--User:Brenont (talk) 04:42, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't know the details, but the Lake Field connection in any case seems looser (though there is still a Cammac logo at one place on its main page). However, Cammac does definitely continue to have a Toronto chapter with activities during the year, so there is still an Ontario connection of some sort. Martinp (talk) 14:35, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  CAMMAC Ontario
Talk:Confédération Internationale des Sociétés d'Auteurs et Compositeurs

message: CISAC needs a disambiguation page or, preferably, should redirect to the Stanford University Center for International Security article as the Confédération Internationale des Sociétés d´Auteurs et Compositeurs is not even a US-EN organization.
171.64.242.6 (talk) 22:16, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  CISAC disambiguation or redirect
Talk:The Chaser election specials

message: "however Firth was not present due to his leaving of the team"
Charles Firth was present in the National Tally Room on election night and did take part in several Chaser stunts. However he could not be included in any ABC footage as he was under contract to Nine Network. 203.7.140.3 (talk) 04:05, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007 series
Talk:Win–stay, lose–switch

message: In a prisoner's dilemma, does WSLS start by cooperating, cheating, or random? Does it consider mutual cooperation a win or a loss? --Thomas B♘talk 02:35, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Define the strategy? 

message: Is this actually called "Win-Stay, Lose-Shift?" Googling "win stay lose switch" gives me a mere 84 results, but "win stay lose shift" gets me 2,580. --Thomas B♘talk 02:36, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Actual Name Win-Stay, Lose-Shift?
Talk:Gesellschaft der Musikfreunde

message: Someone added this piece of info in the article.
:Antonin Dvorak became an honorary member in 1895.
Given the length of the article and the information it contains, I think that the inclusion of this sentence is disproportionate as regards the importance of the fact.--Atavi (talk) 08:08, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Antonín Dvořák

message: The German wiki article (:de:Gesellschaft der Musikfreunde in Wien) has been expanded somewhat, so I'll be copying some of that material over.  It includes (among other things) an alphabetized laundry-list of notable members.  Is this something that should be copied to this article ?  It's not quite trivia, but it's also a fairly long list.  I've summarized the notability of its membership in the current article.Magicpiano (talk) 13:14, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: de wiki article
Talk:International Trumpet Guild

message: Hello, We've now got this: "The 2010 ITG Conference took place in Sydney, Australia; it was the first in the Southern Hemisphere or in Winter (July is part of winter in the Southern Hemisphere)." I don't want to start a big fight but I'm not convinced we need that last bit. It is perhaps interesting/encyclopaedic/remarkable that the conference was in Oz for a change, but I am not sure that we then need to go on to point out that July's in the winter there. We haven't even elsewhere pointed out that it usually takes place at any particular time of year, in fact, so it's almost like that bit is setting up a tension with something unsaid, so it's unnecessary. And finally (sorry, I do go on a bit don't I) I am not sure that it is appropriate, in an article about a trumpet players' society, to have a digression on seasons and the Earth's tilt. If we went down that road there's a LOT more we could bring in like Jens Lindemann's Blackberry and the price of a cheesesteak in Harrisburg, but, with the best will in the world, I don't think it's called for. Cheers, DBaK (talk) 08:28, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, you can get rid of it.  I just figured one of us ignorant Americans would ask how July is in winter. Get rid of it. The Doomsday Machine!  (Blastoff!) 20:47, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Winter 

message: I'm all in favour of having more information on wikipedia but since the rewrite this article seems to have gone from poorly-sourced to unsourced. :) Can we pull it back a bit to have some of this information cited? DBaK (talk) 13:32, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Académie Charles Cros

message: The following does not respresent a worldwide view on the subject:
"L'Académie Charles Cros, the French equivalent of the US Recording Academy, is named in honor of Charles Cros."
I don't know how to reword it after removing the US reference, but perhaps somebody visiting the article will. Lethesl 16:49, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: A change
Talk:Connolly Youth Movement

message: The article reads as if it were written by a member of the group. Can anyone help to balance it out? --84.203.80.59 (talk) 00:09, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV? 

message: Points up for discussion are
- Is CYM an 'all-Ireland Marxist youth organisation' or 'far-left Irish youth organisation'
- Is CYM a MECYO attendee
- Is Issuu's archive of Forward correct
I will refrain from weighing in further than I already have.
Avitus27 (talk) 13:05, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit war discussion 

message: I noticed that the Connolly Youth Movement article had been removed from the Communist Party of Ireland category. I know the CYM disaffiliated itself from the CPI and understand the rational for the removal, but due to the two organisations sharing a 50 year history shouldn't the CYM article stay in the CPI category? Is there a Wiki convention on this? lijkel (talk) 15:02, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should this page be in the Communist Party of Ireland category?  

message: The term "we" is including multiple times throughout the article, written from the perspective of the group
These two sections, worst effected by this bias is literally named ConnollyYM, the name of the organisation
Comedy gold  — Preceding unsigned comment added by MatOregan (talk • contribs) 13:26, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  C'mon
Talk:The Latin Recording Academy

message: I've been doing some owrk on this page. In the infobox I entered some information. One part of it says that the Latin Academy's parent company in NARAS (Recording Academy). Is this true? I think it is but I'm not sure. If it is not true then do not hesitate to remove that bit of information. --MusicGeek101 (talk) 18:59, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Is LARAS owned by NARAS?

message: — Assignment last updated by Pthomas4 (talk) 20:03, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Writing Seminar I
Talk:Association of Hungarian Record Companies

message: Per naming conventions (WP:EN), titles of articles should be named in English, with native-language transliterations in the first line.  So, I'd move the article myself, but I don't speak Hungarian and wouldn't want to make a guess as to what the best translation would be. Drewcifer (talk) 22:33, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  English name 

message: Is there a list of number-one hits of 2008? (Samsonite Man (talk) 19:04, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of number-one singles of 2008? 
Talk:Maryland Music Educators Association

message: A few people have been going back and forth, reversing each others edits over the homeschool controversy which MMEA has found itself embroiled in.  I acknowledge that what's written must be impartial and accurate.  However, an encyclopedia is supposed to provide information, and MMEA is in the middle of a controversy over allowing homeschoolers, which is why I wrote a sentence at the end about it and added a clause at the beginning referring to it.  If those who are editing this article in different ways have a different idea about how to express the controversy, feel free to go ahead and reword it, but let's discuss our reasons for doing so as we work together on editing this article for maximum clarity, impartiality, and accuracy.  Swyilk (talk) 19:05, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reversing edits -- let's discuss 
Talk:50 Reasons to Hate the French

message: The chapter listing seems a bit overwhelming, but the headings give a good feeling for what's in the book.  I was thinking a selection of a few chapter titles might work better - maybe with a (very) brief summary of their contents if someone has access to the book.  -- SiobhanHansa 21:38, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chapter listing