lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Crash and Burn (1990 film)

message: I started this page, and I wouldn't have bothered if I hadn't read the following article at badmovies.org.  The link I added was removed as "linkspam" although I have nothing to do with that site and came across it via a Google search.
Review at Badmovies.org
Seriously, I don't want to start a "flame war" or whatever wiki-equivalent there is, so I'll just leave this note on the talk page.
Kiodane 03:16, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sandy Hollow–Gulgong railway line

message: While the Bylong tunnel was physically complete, but railless, road traffic unofficial used it as a shortcut that avoided the road over the terrain.  As the tunnel was straight, westbound and eastbound flashed their headlights to determine which car/truck had right of way.  Eventually the Roads made this official with proper signs.  When the railway was completed around 1984, road traffic reverted to the route over the range.
Tabletop (talk) 23:50, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tunnel used for road traffic 

message: What are the lengths and gradients of the tunnels on this line?    Tabletop (talk) 07:02, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tunnels 
Talk:Nankin-machi

message: Shouldn't this article be at Nankinmachi instead of "Kobe Chinatown"?  I can't say I've ever heard it referred to in that way before. -- Exitmoose 03:17, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name of Article

message: I have tagged this article for cleanup due to the poor grammar making it incomprehensible. AstroMark (talk) 16:11, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup
Talk:Margaret Fulton

message: Just a note on the books credited to Margaret Fulton. Some books that appear to have been written by Margaret Fulton were actually reissues of books by other authors, with Margaret Fulton's name added ; this can be verified by searching the international catalogue, OCLC, and even some titles in Libraries Australia. For example, Margaret Fulton's book of party cooking was originally written by Norma McMillan and published as The Sainsbury book of party cooking (sbn 9780861780426) ; Margaret Fulton's book of Chinese cooking was originally written by Caroline Ellwood and published as The Sainsbury book of Chinese cooking (sbn 0861781317)
St0dgel0dger1 (talk) 05:49, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Claude V. Ricketts

message: Added details of Ricketts' service at Pearl Harbor and his role in saving West Virginia from capsizing during the attack.  I believe it is significant since (1) it was a prominent event in Ricketts' career, widely referenced in later literature, and (2) Several sources, one of which I referenced in the article, credit Ricketts' action with preventing the loss of the ship, which would have substantially increased the death toll at Pearl Harbor.
152.133.6.2 (talk) 20:36, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:Early modern European cuisine

message: I would put the subsection about Italy before that about France. In fact, this article is about history and Italian cuisine was the European leading cookery during Renaissance, before when France became the leading cookery since the age of Louis XIV. So, I think the order of arguments should show the logical and chronological order of facts. Lele giannoni (talk) 16:34, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I tend to agree, but some rewriting would be needed- which it is anyway, imo. Johnbod (talk) 23:31, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Order
Talk:South Wales Gas Pipeline

message: Out of interest, was the eastern junction to the national network at Corse affected by the flooding ? John 11:58, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Effects of 2007 flooding ? 

message: Good to see an article about the pipeline, thanks. While investigating todays earthquake I came across this -
Which appears to indicate a cluster of seismic activity in the area. What precautions have been designed in ? -- John (Daytona2 ·  Talk ·  Contribs) 09:23, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Earthquake protection ? 

message: I have made a few changes to some details in the section about environmental concerns as it contained a few factual inaccuracies eg detail re Fforest Fawr Geopark. Also the tone of parts of the article is inconsistent with Wikipedia and does not adopt an NPOV stance. I have therefore deleted one or two debatable items. Geopersona (talk) 20:32, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Might also be worth mentioning that in many places you can't see where the pipeline was buried, which rather destroys the environmental arguments!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.44.165.172 (talk) 18:41, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The above comment suggest that in other places you can! Some environmental arguments are sustained, some are not, but this is not the place to debate the merits or de-merits of the pipeline, rather to provide info on the pipeline and indeed record what debate did go on. Geopersona (talk) 05:38, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Environmental sensitivities 
Talk:Samuel Eilenberg

message: Samuel Eilenberg was also a famous dealer in Indian art. (See, for example, Peter Freyd's obituary http://books.nap.edu/html/biomems/seilenberg.html.) Maybe someone who knows more about this than I can add this in somewhere.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.104.54.40 (talk) 22:53, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Anna Maxwell

message: Connection to Greenwich, Connecticut
John Stewart Kennedy's banking firm was later passed on to his nephew, J. Kennedy Tod, who continued Stewart's interest in the well-being of Miss Maxwell and the Presbyterian Hospital nurses. Eleanor Lee writes that beginning in 1901 and continuing through 1913, Mr. Tod made available Innis Arden, his estate in Greenwich, Connecticut, to the nurses as a summer retreat, and that from 1906 through 1913 the nurses had the exclusive summer use of the Innis Arden Cottage, a beachside cottage there. Maxwell was photographed with her nurses at Innis Arden Cottage in 1907 and 1911 by Dr. C. Irving Fisher, the Presbyterian Hospital's medical director and an accomplished amateur photographer. Many of Dr. Fisher's photographs of Maxwell and her nurses, including photographs of them at Innis Arden Cottage, survive in the archives of the George Eastman House, Rochester, New York. Upon Tod's death in 1925, he left his estate, Innis Arden, to the Presbyterian Hospital, which later sold it to the town of Greenwich, Connecticut, where it is now known as Greenwich Point.
*Removed as uncited and appears unrelated to subject of the article. 06:01, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relevance to article?
Talk:Metropolitan Fire Brigade (Melbourne)

message: I am starting the cleanup of this article. --Mikecraig 03:38, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Have done a bit of cleanup, still need assistance with expanding the history of the MFB --Mikecraig 01:27, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good to see that there is more info being put into the article. --Mikecraig 05:06, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: Plenty of info there but it looks like the whole thing has been lifted from another publication. Doesn't really fit the Wikipedia style as per the essay note that has been put there. Unless it can be reliably sourced and summarised I propose removing it. --Jim09 (talk) 02:33, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  EMR section 

message: 1891 - first Chief Fire Officer Kstar5300 (talk) 04:08, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chief Officers and Chief Fire officers
Talk:Electrical, Electronic, Telecommunications and Plumbing Union

message: Sections of this article contain highly emotive language, e.g:
...stuck two fingers up at the TUC.
They were entirely duped.
Which leads me to suspect that the article could be more neutral in its outlook.
--Smallbone10 (talk) 22:14, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV Check 

message: If you abbreviate 'Electrical, Electronic, Telecommunications and Plumbing Union' you get EETPU, not EEPTU. The temptation in trade unions is to include TU, and EEPTU was a common mistake, but it is wrong; as some of the union's opponents put it in the 1980s, it's easy to remember because it ends with 'Pu' which is the chemical symbol for Plutonium which a lot of its members were engaged in making in nuclear power stations. Sam Blacketer (talk) 08:29, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Abbreviation

message: I have listed this article for deletion. It is poorly written, full of opinionated nonsense "sticks two fingers up at the TUC" to name just one example, it has no sources or references whatsoever and doesn't really have any importance or notability. Thank you Christian1985 (talk) 00:13, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I and another editor have  successively removed the deletion tag. There was a possibly poorly supported paragraph that might need better sourcing, but deleting the whole article was totally without justification. That an article may be prejudiced, is in any case a reason for editing, not deletion. DGG ( talk ) 02:51, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion
Talk:1901 Boston Americans season

message: It says that Boston was eliminated from pennant contention on Saturday 9/21/1901 when they lost to the Tigers.  They went into that game 9 games back in the W column.  They had played 127 games to that point.  How many games were left on the schedule?
It looks like the AL ended some games as ties for whatever reason, and counted them as losses for both teams, which is ridiculous.  They should be finished until there is a winner, even if it must be continued on another day.
So since they lost to the Tigers that day, they were still 9 games back since the Sox lost that day, and now played 128 games, 130 counting 2 ties.  If it were a 138-game schedule, then it makes sense that that game eliminated them, albeit with the 2 ties counting as losses.  But the Brewers played 139 games that season, so it doesn't make any sense.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.73.132.54 (talk) 18:29, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  How many games were supposed to be played in the 1901 AL season?
Talk:Rationalization

message: why are there here two different spellings of the word? is it acceptable to have an s?
:Check American and British English spelling differences under Greek-derived spellings.Zebulin (talk) 19:20, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In English men A-Levels at least, rationalisation is removing the irrational only, with the separate term "realisation" for removing the imaginary part.
212.219.189.230 18:34, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  In ` k e e k s <3 Mathematics
Talk:Temple blocks

message: Temple Block, particularly the capitalized version of the phrase, needs to link to the disambiguation page. A Temple Block is not "automatically" assumed to be a wooden fish! Keizers (talk) 17:11, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: What is this redirect???

message: How about this page is moved specifically to Temple block (instrument) with a redirect for Temple blocks (instrument)? Personally, I don't care too much about the redirects as long as it's recognized that modern temple blocks are distinct from the muyu. Why? I Ask (talk) 19:14, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: A compromise

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: no consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:24, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Temple block →  – Needs disambiguation as several locations are also named Temple Block Why? I Ask (talk) 20:18, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

text: This is a contested technical request (permalink). GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 16:05, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 17 February 2022
Talk:American Society for Mass Spectrometry

message: I noticed the previous ASMS meetings had been removed. While I agree Wikipedia is not a directory, ASMS is a major scientific society that have had significant impact on many fields of science with many breakthroughs first presented at the ASMS conference. For many other scientific societies and awards, such lists are included in their Wikipedia pages. Another example would be major sports events, which are typically also listed. ASMS is the major conference in the field, with 7,000+ attendants and 3,000+ presentations every year. The deletion seems wholesale and without proper motivation. Will undo it until convinced (on this talk page) these sections should be removed.
MagnusPalmblad (talk) 10:22, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Unencyclopedic list
Talk:Noel Gayler

message: The original references to Squadron VX-III (VX-3) contained a link to a Wikipedia page that refers to a Sony consumer product by that designation. I removed the bogus link. There is currently no Wikipedia article on the Navy's experimental jet fighter squadron VX-III. Moshe95 (talk) 17:03, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Course reserve

message: Current stub sounds like a dictionary entry. Davidwr 03:58, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Move to Wiktoinary??
Talk:Drug intolerance

message: The first paragraph is without citation and quite likely wrong. It states things rather black and white w/o the sort of discussion this requires.   To stand, it will need to be pretty well referenced and explain why the underlying mechanism why you cannot tolerate a medication (which you may never know--but you will know you are intolerant of it, because, well you cannot tolerate it) is a defining feature.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.73.1.89 (talk) 08:15, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that the leading paragraph has problems. I disagree with the claim that "Drug intolerance or drug sensitivity is a lower threshold to the normal pharmacologic action of a drug;" it's not about a threshold to "normal pharmacologic action," but rather a lower threshold for toxicity/ADRs. It would probably be worth discussing the concepts of TI, ADRs, and therapeutic effect. Biochemistry&Love (talk) 04:13, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  First paragraph--move to strike the whole thing 

message: I think it would be useful to distinguish drug intolerance from drug sensitivity. Drug intolerance isn't necessarily due to drug sensitivity, which I see as an example of a physiological drug intolerance (which could be genetic in nature or due to clinical circumstances, like a DDI or a disease state that alters the ADME properties of a drug, inducing a complication like metabolic acidosis). 
There's also the case of what I might call psychosomatic drug intolerance, which is more of a subjective (and idiopathic?) cause of drug intolerance. Just as different people have different pain tolerances, so too do people have different tolerances for dealing with the adverse effects from their medications. For example, while opioid-induced constipation may be tolerable to some individuals, other people may stop taking an opioid due to the unpleasantness of the constipation even if it brings them significant pain relief.
Any thoughts on this? Biochemistry&Love (talk) 19:05, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Drug intolerance vs. drug sensitivity

message: In the first paragraph, the article states that drug intolerance "is not to be confused with a drug allergy, which is a form of drug intolerance, but requires an immune-mediated component." In this case, the circle labeled "drug allergy" should be completely inside the circle for "drug intolerance" in the venn diagram since drug allergy is a form of drug intolerance. William2001(talk) 03:30, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed! Thank you for pointing that out. I've adjusted the image per your suggestion. ―Biochemistry🙴❤ 23:44, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  First paragraph and the venn diagram does not match
Talk:WZAM

message: I don't know when the station signed on, but it only became WMVN on 8/26/1982. Before then, I was also WUPY (yes, they screamed out "Whoopee" on the air). A talk show called "Telephone Time" aired in the morning with Jay Jennings. That was the late 60s and early 70s probably. I'm not updating any of this because I was a kid and don't have a good enough recollection to update an encyclopedia entry. But I remember it... my mom was a loyal listener. So I'm updating the info on the sign-on date...Goeverywhere 17:32, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sign-on Date 
Talk:Cactolith

message: nice to see one of my favorite geological terms - also found in the AGI (American Geological Institute) Glossary (or Dictionary) of Geology,(published in 1980's) and not, as I recall, attributed to Charley Hunt.
Thanks, Jude Gassaway Jude Gassaway (talk) 19:03, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Piassava

message: This is copied from an old dictionary. Davidwr 04:09, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Move to Wiktionary??
Talk:Graphic designer

message: Graphic designer 102.128.131.209 (talk) 10:06, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Graphic designer 

message: Hi. My name  Ali Mughal. 103.141.158.4 (talk) 17:58, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arts. 

message: — Assignment last updated by Alexa0406 (talk) 14:41, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Composition II
Talk:Belgian Red cattle

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Alentejana Cattle which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 21:30, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Kitchen Confidential

message: ----
I'm not so sure that the book and the TV show need to be on the same page......  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.194.28.132 (talk) 13:23, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

message: Should never in a million years be in the same article or even spoken of in the same breath. Softlavender (talk) 04:00, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done: Created a separate article: Kitchen Confidential (television series). Softlavender (talk) 04:30, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Jeez Louise, please separate the book and the TV show

message: There are a lot of links that point to the book that should point to the TV series. I don't have the necessary tools to enable me to do this quickly, but I'm hoping someone can disambiguate the pages. 24.41.47.147 (talk) 20:20, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Linking
Talk:LimeSurvey

message: I noticed today that version 1.8 was released.  I am updating the side bar of information, but other changes may be necessary based on new features. --Computermacgyver (talk) 04:49, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: v1.80 Released
Talk:Basella

message: I've seen this genus referred to as Basilia. Is this an error? — ℜob C. alias ᴀʟᴀʀoʙ 20:15, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Basilia? 

message: 4 of 5 are from South-East African and another is all the way from India, I think we may have the wrong source as India..  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nick12506 (talk • contribs) 14:34, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Locations correct?
Talk:Franciscan Complex

message: I removed this section:
:Archaeological recovery of Franciscan chert prehistoric tools from Native American sites in the western USA acknowledges the use of Franciscan material as a diagnostic indicator of rock source and thus the presumption of ancient trading patterns among tribes. For example finds of Franciscan chert in Central California suggest extensive trade between tribes of the San Francisco Bay Area with Chumash peoples.C.M. Hogan, 2008
While it is certainly possible that there was "extensive trade between tribes of the San Francisco Bay Area with Chumash peoples", this is not supported by the reference --  -- which says nothing of trade.  San Luis Obispo County has abundant outcrops of Franciscan rocks, including the Morro Bay area, the subject of the reference.  Anyone feel free to put this paragraph back if there is a better reference, i.e. one that specifically traces that particular chert to the San Francisco Bay Area.  (The first sentence of the paragraph may indeed be true; we just need a different example.)  Cheers, Antandrus  (talk) 04:40, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Prehistoric tools section removed

message: Should this be added to the article as a sub section under Description Meghomita (talk) 17:36, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: yes good idea Christierowe (talk) 16:08, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversies related to "defining the architectural units of Franciscan Complex" 

message: Should this be added as a subsection under Geological History Meghomita (talk) 20:28, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: yes good idea Christierowe (talk) 16:12, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversies related to "defining the age problems in Franciscan" 

message: The "assemblage" is not modern stratigraphic nomenclature Christierowe (talk) 16:08, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title of article should be Franciscan Complex 

message: Trying to update the Description and Geological History section with more updated references from journal articles. Will add some new pictures to highlight the rock types and outcrops of the Franciscan. The lead section and the information box will also be updated to include the above mentioned changes Meghomita (talk) 19:44, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trying to update the Description and Geological History Section
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/SFGiants

message: User:SFGiants
      run at Wed May 2 04:33:37 2007 GMT
Category:	9
Help:	1
Image:	11
Mainspace	1543
MediaWiki talk:	1
Portal:	1
Talk:	127
Template talk:	7
Template:	69
User talk:	139
User:	126
Wikipedia talk:	25
Wikipedia:	180
avg edits per page	1.45
earliest	19:58, 7 August 2005
number of unique pages	1547
total	2239
2005/08 	69 	
2005/09 	32 	
2005/10 	152 	
2005/11 	536 	
2005/12 	330 	
2006/01 	49 	
2006/02 	173 	
2006/03 	178 	
2006/04 	30 	
2006/05 	21 	
2006/06 	8 	
2006/07 	15 	
2006/08 	43 	
2006/09 	72 	
2006/10 	118 	
2006/11 	240 	
2006/12 	100 	
2007/01 	16 	
2007/02 	14 	
2007/03 	7 	
2007/04 	16 	
2007/05 	20 	
SFGiant's editcount summary stats as of 05:33, 2nd May 2007, using Interiot's wannabe Kate's tool. (aeropagitica) 04:35, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Paxtang, Pennsylvania

message: The section about Paxton Presbyterian Church is lifted almost word for word from the church's website. Some of the language needs to be changed if it is to be considered an encyclopedia article. PurpleChez (talk) 14:27, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright violation

message: The "Paxton" and "Paxtang" referred to in the history does not refer only to the present day borough of Paxtang, but to a much, much, MUCH larger tract that once covered a large portion of Dauphin County and has since been divided into Upper, Middle and Lower Paxton Townships, several other townships (Susquehanna, maybe, and perhaps the Swataras), and several boroughs. [user:PurpleChez|PurpleChez] 7/17/14  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.118.65.34 (talk) 18:49, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 