Talk:Social alienation

message: The link from the rather abstract philosophical discussion at the beginning to the everyday use of the term "alienated" seemed a bit odd. None of the examples relate to aliens from space. However, the examples were useful so I have removed some wording and added a heading "everyday use of the term". Itsmejudith 15:00, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Space aliens

message: Qoute;
"social alienation refers to the individual's estrangement from traditional community and others in general."
This means that social needs is measured exlusive by it's ability to re-confirm the worth of conservate culture. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.233.116.226 (talk) 03:37, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of neutrality. 

message: This article has no sources, is heavily biased towards Marxist social theory, and links "The Catcher in the Rye." No discussion is raised concerning the psychological aspects of alienation, and the overall tone of the article when discussing society is petty and pessimistic. The article's quality is low compared to the other social and psychological articles on Wikipedia. This is not a first-year Sociology course. jdyachimec 1:03, 21 October 2007.
Marx and the situation in the 1800's and 1900's but no information about the current situation of alienation.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.41.105.100 (talk) 08:30, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Lack of Content/Quality

message: atomism of modern society means that individuals have shallower relations with other people than they would normally.
Not correct. What does “ normally” refer to, what are “normal” social relations, and by what the “normality” of social relations is defined?   Atomistic social structure isn't “abnormal” it simply exists. The social relations in an atomistic social structure  are not “shallower” but weaker, more sporadic, momentary, contractual and  more formal, than in a traditional society.
This, it is argued, leads to difficulties in understanding and adapting to each other's uniqueness  
On the contrary. In an “atomistic” society people are “allowed” to be more unique, and to demonstrate their individual traits and habits in a bolder manner since they are not subdued to a coherent set of behavioral norms. The social structure, simply,  does not have the power to impose on individuals a set of restricting  norms and values  of behavior. Therefore there is no defined and clear guideline to conform to, therefore, “uniqueness” (whatever it  may mean) is not viewed as an irregular conduct of behavior that one should strive to understand and accept. Please note: 1. The writer of this segment did not explain this part (i.e. why do individuals have difficulties in adapting to each other) , basically because it is wrong and therefore inexplicable. 2. the writer refers the reader to the Wiki definition of “ Normlessness” , which is  a term  driven from what I have just explained.
I suggest using the  proper sociological term “individuality” instead of  “uniqueness”
--Cautious Pedestrian (talk) 03:57, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The definition is inaccurate 

message: There are likely many different kinds of alienation, which tend to correspond to every different branch of sociology (see List of sociology topics). There is linguistic alienation, when speakers of a different language tend to feel alienated, religious alienation, which has already been described by Marx, age alienation, when people are older or younger, sexual alienation, described by Freud, etc. These sub-branches of alienation ought to described more by using accurate resources. ADM (talk) 19:40, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Diferent kinds of alienation

message: I found a slightly different definition of alienation in Peter L. Bergers "The sacred canopy - elements of a sociological theory of religion":
"Put differently, alienation is the process whereby the dialectical relationship between the individual and his world is lost to consciousness. The individual 'forgets' that this world was and continues to be co-produced by him. Alienated consciousness is undialectical consciousness. The essential difference between the socio-cultural world and the world of nature is obscured-namely, the difference that men have made the first, but not the second (6). Inasmuch as alienated consciousness is based on this fallacy, it is a false consciousness (7)" (p. 85, paragraph 3)
I find the parts that I marked bold as the important effect of social alienation.
--217.216.59.41 (talk) 10:34, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peter Bergers Alienation 

message: Added on behalf on an unregistered user: 
This is unclear, can it be explained? "André Gorz, Albert Camus and Theodor Adorno, among others" what? - 75.18.212.90 
--GD 6041 (talk) 05:28, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  André Gorz, Albert Camus and Theodor Adorno, among others 

message: I'm going to make a change so it doesn't as directly revolve around Seeman's publication, but rather around proposed aspects of alienation (guided for now by his classification though) - so easier then to cover other aspects/views on it. Eversync (talk) 14:44, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Headings 

message: This section, called sources, is an External links section with another name that has grown out of control, so I have moved it out of the article into this talk page. Please see Wikipedia:External links and put only links back in that are in accordance with WP:ELYES or WP:ELNO, and please motivate why the link should be there. Thank you! Lova Falk talk 08:32, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: The first sentence of this article (see below) is incomprehensible. Where is the verb? What is Eric Fromm doing in it? Why is there a closing quotation mark but not an opening quotation mark? Please correct it.
:Alienation, a sociological concept developed by several classical and contemporary theorists,[1] Eric Fromm, by a low degree of integration or common values and a high degree of distance or isolation between individuals, or between an individual and a group of people in a community or work environment."
Many thanks, 194.94.133.9 (talk) 08:14, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incomprehensible 

message: Cyberbot II has detected links on Social alienation which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: local or global
If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locally or globally.
When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags.
Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
*http://www.robertankony.com/publications/impact-perceived/
*:Triggered by \brobertankony\.com\b on the local blacklist
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:28, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blacklisted Links Found on [[Social alienation]] 

message: Why is it placed in this template? davronova.a. 13:04, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aspects of capitalism? 

message: I noticed that an IP added a tag disputing the neutrality of the "Among returning war veterans" section back in 2017. I'm not sure exactly what the IP took issue with, but in my opinion, the whole section should be removed. In the first paragraph, most of the content isn't clearly related to social alienation, and most of the content that is more pertinent is full of weasel words. The second paragraph is a bit more encyclopedic, but seems to have too narrow a focus to be a stand-alone section here. Maybe with some changes it could be moved to another article on the Vietnam War.
Just thought I should look for some feedback before I started editing. Clarinetguy097 (talk) 04:16, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality(?) of war veterans section 

message: I dislike the structure where the lead, definitional sentence largely consists of quoted material. 
Social alienation is "a condition in social relationships reflected by a low degree of integration or common values and a high degree of distance or isolation between individuals, or between an individual and a group of people in a community or work environment".
This is not the only definition, by far. 
Furthermore, it makes the lead sentence almost impossible to edit or revise, because you can't edit inside quoted material without damaging the authenticity of the quote. 
What sucks about this particular quote is that the parse-tree is distinctly non-trivial, as you have to correctly bind the "and"s and all those "or"s, too. Nasty. — MaxEnt 20:13, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead sentence: too many ors jammed into a nasty oar lock