Template talk:Naruto

message: On a minor note, wouldn't this info box be better placed at the very bottom of the page, rather than at the top of the See Also section? --Pentasyllabic 00:12, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Something 2

message: I think that linking to Genin, Chuunin and Jounin is unnecessary, since there is a link to the Ninja Ranks page. The Ninja rank page is not nearly as long as the Technique page (for which is makes sense to have links to the seperate parts of it). Also, why are there links to seperate articles for each rank? As it stands, there is not enough material on the Ninja Rank page to justify having seperate articles. Comments? ~MDD4696 (talk • contribs) 23:33, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I think Croatnik is planning to migrate the Konoha ninja by rank, as he's done with (Konoha) Jonin, they're not supposed to be articles on the actual ranks. --Pentasyllabic 00:06, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, that makes a lot more sense. ~MDD4696 (talk • contribs) 02:48, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

text: First, what does this have to do with Ninja Ranks? Second, walk up to some random average person on the street and ask, "What's the hand sign for the horse?" 101% of the time they won't know what you're talking about, and thus the phrase "horse hand sign" has no meaning to random average people. Next, walk up to some random Naruto viewer/reader and ask the same question. 99.999% of the time you will get the same reaction, and thus it has no meaning to the type of person that would know. Are my percentages off? Maybe, but most people will find no value in knowing the hand signs of some Naruto jutsu. ~SnapperTo 05:14, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Ninja Ranks

message: Though sorting by country affiliation does make sense, I think it rather problematically collides with how the average viewer would intuitively categorise the members of the roster. Team 7 is obviously supposed to be one unit, even if Sasuke happens to currently be in Otogakure. Similarly the rest of the rookie 9 and team Gai are also one unit, as the anime team constantly cares to remind us ("Discord Satellite" opening and "Ima Made Nando Mo" ending come to mind). So I changed the template to reflect the way I think people intuitively perceive the cast, which should be conductive to navigation (the template's purpose). --AceMyth 01:21, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Categorisation Change

message: How is he any less important than Zabuza, Haku, Tenten and the other couple of unimportant characters? Nemu 20:18, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sasori is not important by himself, but rather for the information he gives. I would consider Deidara far more important if we're going to be including individual members of Akatsuki. Sasori only existed as a clue to Sasuke's whereabouts. He does little on his own. Deidara, on the other hand, manages to defeat Gaara, fights Kakashi and Naruto, and is still alive to tell the tale. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 02:46, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And yet Zabuza stays? --tjstrf 17:23, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: He's the first real villian, something of a milestone to be sure. He fought the whole of Team 7 over a protracted period, not a single battle. Additionally, he's included with Haku, who's the subject of a ridiculous number of flashbacks (they really need to drop it). I disagree with including Sasori on his own because his appearance is insubstantial at best, and half of his duo remains alive. It also makes it seem as if his motives are somehow separate from Akatsuki, when they weren't. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 17:30, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Really, what we need to do is write the article on Itachi, (possibly Hidan as well in a couple weeks), make Akatsuki a sub-category of villians, and list them both there. --tjstrf 03:26, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I won't remove him for now, but I don't see his notability beyond his organization. I still think we should lump them so this doesn't result in too much in one section. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 02:41, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Bleh, but I will. Having Sasori by himself on the template makes it seem as if he's the most important member of Akatsuki or something. The Splendiferous Gegiford 18:19, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If it made you feel better, we could redlink the others for you. Not sure that would really help though. --tjstrf 18:26, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sasori

message: I decided to add Masashi Kishimoto to the header, for general purposes. - Malomeat 04:43, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Author's name

message: Given the recent happenings, would it be right to place him there temporarily? - Malomeat 05:20, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Kakashi to team Asuma?

message: ? --TheYmode 09:48, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Team Guy = Team 9??? 

message: What's with the empty Chakra articles.Sam ov the blue sand 04:09, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What's with the empty Chakra articles - they were put up to A. incurage information to be added and B. to serve as the template for the creation of new pages with information that was being added. someguy0830 removed them....instead of adding information.photodude 04:22, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe they should be added though but under one article not four it would be some useful info. And don't worry you're not the only one who has a problem with Someguy.Sam ov the blue sand 04:29, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no need for a separate article on it. It's fine being mentioned in others. Also, don't just copy and paste info from a site. That's plagiarism. Nemu 04:37, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I disagree with you based on the shear volume of information on chakra in the naruto world, and how importaint it is to jutsu's. what you suggest is like saying there is no need for a seperate article on each type of jutsu. photodude 04:35, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

text:  I will try to get a chakra guide up (I've been working on one for 3 year as part of a NarutoRPG WOD type game) that is if someone doesn't delete the information and links before I can post it. I agree 4 articles might be a bit much (but there is a lot of info on Chakra in naruto almost as much as there is on jutsu's) I wouldn't have tried for 4 articles if I knew how to link to sections of an article. I'm not well versed in writing whole articles for wiki.photodude 04:32, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What if I was to help make it I wouldn't copy and paste anything. I know how to (see X-49 Night Raven for example). Please.Sam ov the blue sand 04:44, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll even supply Sam ov the blue sand with all the info and images I have. that is if Sam ov the blue sand wants them photodude 04:45, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course I'll help and just call me Sam it's better than typing Sam ov the blue sand everyone else does.Sam ov the blue sand 04:54, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  ok Sam how should I send u the information. I can set up a FTP site or a http access page or email MSNim it to you photodude 04:58, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you put it on my userpage?Sam ov the blue sand 05:09, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  done and posted to your user page photoguy 05:27, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Controlling.doc chakra2 doesn't come up why? try posting it again.Sam ov the blue sand 05:40, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nameing error. the link should be fixed now photoguy 05:53, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

text: I've copied or wrote all of it since about 3 months after I started watching Naruto and started adding more when I started reading the manga. that was over 3 years ago. I had intended to produce a RPG game based on WOD rules so I have been anal about gathering data on all aspects of naruto. Cut what has to be cut to make an article (this is why i started making 4 or 5 articles) I'll put in what I can tonight; until I end my night and take care of my 6 stiches (read my blog for details and pictures) photoguy 06:05, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chakra 

message: Look I'm going to delete the Rookie Nine article I've asked about on the talk page and no answer. Objections anyone (I'm working on my spelling, yah).Sam ov the blue sand 00:22, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You're not an admin. You can't delete anything. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 00:28, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't mean delete I meant get rid of it off of the template. And I know I'm not an admin and I will never be one.Sam ov the blue sand 00:33, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Until the article itself is deleted, there's no reason for it to be removed from the template. ~SnapperTo 04:53, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree I'm sorry but I'm a new person for the better, I swear.Sam ov the blue sand 22:54, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rookie Nine 

message: I think since this is the English wiki show titles should be in English
:Yes I agree all the jutsu names are English so why not NHC?Sam ov the blue sand 23:16, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Wait never mind just looked at the Naruto Shippūden talk page wow talk about Talk Page War 1!!! Man that's alot of posts!Sam ov the blue sand 01:09, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naruto: Shippūden or Hurricane Chronicles? 

message: I think all noticable characters should have a link. That would include characters who are important, have put a major impact on the series, or have appeared several times throughout the series. This would include characters like Konohamaru, Iruka, Dosu, Zaku, Kimimaro, Suigetsu, Tobi, Baki, etc. I understand that we are all wondering if we should keep only the most important characters, or if we should keep all noticable characters. I think we should keep all noticable characters. That way, everyone will know which characters to keep in mind. The examples I listed above are definately characters that all Naruto fans should know about. What do you guys think?
:We can't add every "noticable" character to the template; we have links to character lists for a reason. // DecaimientoPoético 03:07, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Noticable Characters