Talk:Fadak

message: Under the Abu Bakr's rea subsection, someone has added a response from a Shia blogsite. Highly unnecesarry, as it has already been stated in the same subsection that the shia disagree with the mentioned explanation. Altering the subsection was in this case about one thing: Propaganda. 194.239.178.165 17:54, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "However, these hadiths were never heard before the incident of Fadak, and no one had ever heard them except Abu Bakr."
The above mentioned is a lie! If this were the case, it would not be narrated with a sound chain by the Shia infallible imams now would it? 194.239.178.165 17:59, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Propaganda 

message: The hadith from Bukhari quoted under the 'Umar's era subsection has already been dealt with in the article, and in fact, in no way does it support the claim that some property who was originally the property of Abbas and Ali was restored to them. Therefore, i have deleted it. It actually says:
'Umar said, "Be patient! I beseech you by Allah by Whose Permission the Heaven and the Earth exist, do you know that Allah's Apostle said, 'Our (i.e. prophets') property will not be inherited, and whatever we leave, is Sadaqa (to be used for charity),' and Allah's Apostle meant himself (by saying "we)?" The group said, "He said so." 'Umar then turned to 'Ali and 'Abbas and said, "I beseech you by Allah, do you know that Allah's Apostle said so?" They replied, " He said so."
 
I guess you did'nt even care to read it.
Sa.valikian, in the future, you should participate on the talk pages instead of just writing something in the article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.239.178.165 (talk) 08:25, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yet more shia propaganda 

message: I deleted some sections from the "Ali's Era" section.  I deleted the hadith quoted from al-Shafi, since the citation did not pan out.  Al-Shafi is a four-volume source available on-line, and if a proper citation from that book can be found it can be added back to the article.
I also deleted the subsequent reference to taqiyya, and its definition and rejection by most Sunnis as being irrelevant.  If the purported hadith from al-Shafi is found to be properly cited and a reference to taqiyya needs to be made a hyperlink to an article on taqiyya would be more appropriate than a tangential, and hence incomplete, reference in the current article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.135.96.197 (talk) 18:56, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: what about it today

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests October 2011 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:42, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Fatimah callig.gif Nominated for Deletion

message: The article has both spellings intermingled. The Wikipedia article is at Fatimah. This is way outside my area of knowledge and there might be a reason for it, so I didn't want to make the corrections myself. If someone who has the background could fix it, the article would be better. Thank you. SchreiberBike (talk) 00:52, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fatimah or Fatima 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Fadak. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927013047/http://www.answering-ansar.org/answers/fadak/tafseer_dur_almanthur_v4_p177.jpg to http://www.answering-ansar.org/answers/fadak/tafseer_dur_almanthur_v4_p177.jpg
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:49, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Fadak. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060516223630/http://www.balagh.net/english/ahl_bayt/fatima_the_gracious/49.htm to http://www.balagh.net/english/ahl_bayt/fatima_the_gracious/49.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929094548/http://www.answering-ansar.org/answers/fadak/fadak_of_al_zahra.pdf to http://www.answering-ansar.org/answers/fadak/fadak_of_al_zahra.pdf
*Added  tag to http://imfi.ir/english/lib/pro_ahl/fatima/fadak_in_history/index.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:44, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: In the next few weeks, I'll hopefully revise the article to replace the primary and other unreliable sources with reliable secondary sources. Albertatiran (talk) 13:06, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Primary sources 

message: This article switches between the Sunni and Shia view almost haphazardly. 2001:1970:5163:1200:0:0:0:E6B (talk) 01:06, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Differentiation between Sunni and Shia sources.