Talk:Piano Concerto in G major (Ravel)

message: Well, I did my best to rework it. The form section has been completely redone, and I think it's much more accurate now..
----
The form section REALLY needs a reworking.  "Strong, classical form"? "Loosely tertiary"? For such a wonderfully complex and beautiful piece, this section does not enlighten at all.  I think it should be removed. 24.68.50.92 (talk) 02:23, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Piano Concerto (Ravel). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060211084809/http://newyorkphilharmonic.org:80/programNotes/Ravel_PianoConcertoinG.pdf to http://newyorkphilharmonic.org/programNotes/Ravel_PianoConcertoinG.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:07, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: In the untitled talk section there is some discussion of the title for the concerto and article.  I think all agree the title should be in English.  In decades of music listening I have heard this concerto called "Concerto in G", far more than anything else.  So, why is that not the article title?  I'm asking because I'm surprised it isn't and I would like to know how the current title came to be.  But as for changing the title, I don't suggest it because it would seem to be more trouble than it's worth.  Zaslav (talk) 03:05, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Having just been adding some text to the article I too am not wild about the present title. Ravel undeniably wrote two piano concertos, one in G and one in D (for the left hand). I think our title here ought to be Piano Concerto in G (Ravel). I'd be happy to do all the fiddly rearrangements if this is agreed, but have any other editors got a view on the matter? Tim riley talk 21:19, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that the article title ought to be "Piano Concerto in G (Ravel)". In the case of almost any other composer, it would be "Piano Concerto No. 2" (or "No. 1"), but the Ravel concertos are never referred to that way, largely because they were composed concurrently.—Jerome Kohl (talk) 21:27, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

text: Some while ago Piano Sonata (Liszt) was moved to Piano Sonata in B minor (Liszt). Even though he only ever wrote one sonata, it's always for some reason referred to by its key. Just as Franck's sole symphony gets Symphony in D minor (Franck).  We could spend time working out why these things are as they are, but that wouldn't change anything, and we have to be guided by how these things are actually referred to out there in RL. So, this move gets my tick. --  Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 22:07, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for this, gentlemen. I'll leave it a day or two longer and then, barring objections in the meantime, do the necessary. Tim riley talk 12:02, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you, all.  I love this piece as well as the Gershwin concerto and most of what Ravel wrote.  Zaslav (talk) 02:02, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title