lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Guy Davis (comics)

message: He lives with two skulls of horses? Or is that a horse type I don't get with my inferior Englisch knowledge?—Preceding unsigned comment added by USER NAME OR IP (talk • contribs) DATE AND TIME
:I've attended an Artist Talk he presented, and he mentioned his love of the look of horse skulls and how he finds them more exotic looking than human skulls (hence why he draws them quite frequently, if you look at The Marquis, etc.) I wouldn't be surprised if he literally has two 'pet' horse skulls (akin to a pet rock).70.227.157.142 (talk) 17:45, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Horse skulls? 
Talk:Float (project management)

message: I'm marking this as a stub, not just because it lacks content, but also because it even more severely lacks textual content.  Much of the content is one big image, and I'm sure the information could be presented in textual form.  To get as much information as possible into a textual form would be sensible from an accessibility POV. -- Smjg 02:36, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

message: As someone who has come to this site wanting to know how to work out slack/float, I must say it has told me nothing of use. why not include an equation such as float = LS - ES? The diagram (which someone has suggested is incorrect any way) includes no information on ES, EF duration, etc. so it is not even possible to extrapolate how these figures are arrived at.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brentonjames (talk • contribs) 01:57, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  A definition please 

message: "Slack/Float" is basically an inherent feature of individual project/task/milestone scheduling.
This has come up over at the OOPM (openoffice.org) qa feature request list, as well.
However, given either Pert or other methodologies, this seems to be an inherent feature
of those methodologies.
To be precise, I would call this FUD, or a red herring, so to say.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.54.97.90 (talk) 19:51, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please remove 
Talk:Dunvegan Castle

message: Sounds like an advertisement for the castle rather than an informative article. 159.99.6.80 (talk) 03:51, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If anyone ever comes across an article that seems too much like an advert you can add a template like this one, at the top of the article. Don't be afraid to edit and improve articles.--Celtus (talk) 09:10, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Sounds like an advert

message: What about when it was build?  Who built it?  Who lived there?  Is this only a tourist attraction? No history here.Rstarcher (talk) 10:53, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: You are quite right, its not a great article. Why not have a bash at improving it? Jonathan Oldenbuck (talk) 11:52, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  No real information 

message: "Dunvegan Castle is the oldest continuously inhabited castle in Scotland" I just saw the castle featured on Globetrekker and they said its the oldest still inhabited in all of Britain. Should the wording be changed? --98.246.156.76 (talk) 23:36, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: If you can find a suitable reference, then yes. Ben MacDui 08:07, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Have you ever seen Globetrekker? I mean, I was curious if you think it would qualify as a good reference. --98.246.156.76 (talk) 01:37, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It is not the best reference in the world but it is better than nothing. However dunvegancastle.com themselves don't make the claim. I'd suggest adding something like "and possibly Britain" at the end with the globetrek reference. Ben MacDui 08:44, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Oldest inhabited in all of Britain?
Talk:Osco-Umbrian languages

message: Even though this is a site about languages, there is almost no actual relevant linguistic information here. I will start to add some of this, particularly from Buck, but also other sources, as I am able.Johundhar (talk) 20:09, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Impoverished site

message: I moved the following text here, since it is rather rambling and outdated. Someone who really knows about this might try to merge it into the appropriate articles, but I am guessing it's not worth it.  Chl 21:54, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Sabellic]] from 1911 Britannica

message: What on earth is the "Prestonian" language?  I thought I knew a little bit about this subject--but this is a new one to me....  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjhrynick (talk • contribs) 20:01, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems to have disappeared.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.146.195.47 (talk) 15:07, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: It might have been a feeble joke.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.146.195.47 (talk) 15:10, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prestonian? 

message: The box at the top of the page says "Spanish". Spanish is of the Latin type, but not immediately 
relevant to Oscan and the like.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.146.195.47 (talk) 12:22, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spanish
Talk:Weapons of Mass Deception

message: This reads as a somewhat biased article. Also, why is it listed under "Political Forgery"?
Isn't this a hoax, or an example of inaccurate statements or controversial issues? I thought this category was for faked documents.
Erm, shouldn't this page at the very least mention that indeed no weapons of mass destruction have been found in Iraq up to this day? --148.197.135.65 10:06, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV?

message: The "500 hundred" claim was irrelevant and misleading. The article is about a satarical commentary, not about the relevance of the Bush Administration's claims. Furthermore, the status of the weapons is highly suspect, and sources within the government are indicating they were abandoned and useless, no part of any stockpile.
I have removed the claim and provided a link to a page dedicated to the subject. --208.41.98.142 19:18, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misleading Statement 

message: This page used to be an article:
70.29.210.242 (talk) 09:18, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Instead of being prodded, perhaps it should just be reverted to article form. 70.29.210.242 (talk) 09:18, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Article
Talk:Legality of cannabis in the United States

message: I would have said this article was a POV fork, had another article existed. Right now the article only talks about this fringe theory that DuPont tried to make it illegal, but in time it should talk about the full history and current legality of cannibis in the US as the new title indicates. savidan(talk) (e@) 22:22, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This was actually a split off a section from the main Cannabis (drug) article (and the DuPont thing really isn't a fringe theory). --Rory096 03:35, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

message: This article is very small, only provides only a limited amount of information and can be referened on Legal issues of cannabis or Decriminalization of marijuana in the United States, so I am going to merge this article into those two article, then delete this article, unless anyone has any objections. -ChristopherMannMcKay 19:09, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The sourced information on this article is already on Legal history of marijuana in the United States. I propose this article is blanked and re-directed to Legal history of marijuana in the United States; does anyone object or have a better suggestion? Please offer your input. —User:Christopher Mann McKay 02:31, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Delete this article
Talk:Sheeda

message: Noting the similarity of Sheeda's pronunciation to that of the Irish sidhe seems a bit silly. Since sidhe is pronounced 'shee', the word Sheeda is about as similar to it as it is to the third person singular pronoun for a female. Or the word duh, which is used to express ones dismissal of the obviousness of something. Perhaps this is Grant Morrison's intent! Heck, Sheeda is a sorta rhyme of PETA. Clearly the name is intended to represent Grant Morrison's own vegetarian lifestyle! Sheeda is similar to Shaido. Is Morrison ripping off Robert Jordan?! If you change Sheeda around, it's Dashee! Kinda like the daisho that honorable samurai wore. Yes. Yes, I think it was Morrison's intent to tell us that the Sheeda like using two swords, one longer than the other. Hm. Sheeda ... wheat-a ... weetabix ... bic lighters ... lightning ... thunder ... thunder god ... Susano O No Mikoto ... the Kyoto protocol ... pollution ... smoke ... cigarettes. Yes. Yes, I see it now. The demonic race of the Sheeda are Grant Morrison's anti-smoking message. I gotta add this into the article ASAP!
Anyway. That it sounds like sidhe seems like a coincidence to me. More likely, the name Sheeda is a reference to the shedim demons of Judaic lore. 24.62.27.66 22:25, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, having read the latest Frankeinstein, apparently they ARE connected to the Irish legends of the sidhe. OH WELL! I still wouldn't say it makes a lot of sense, but hey, it's Grant Morrison. It doesn't need to. 24.62.27.66 04:14, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sidhe 

message: This whole section looks like original research to me.  I'm adding a citation tag, and we should consider removing it altogether.  It doesn't really seem to hold together, and it has the awful "some fans believe," which always means "the person who edited this believes."  I admit to using it myself many times. Pitr 05:53, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Meta-commentary
Talk:Imperial Hubris

message: There are a number of online book reviews available for this book.  Should they be placed in the external links? 204.210.35.48 22:26, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure; go for it!-csloat 22:30, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  book reviews 

message: Michael_Scheuer
"Imperial_Hubris":
"Imperial Hubris: Why the West is Losing the War on Terror".
hubris
David_Corn
Michael_Isikoff
< http://davidcorn.com >:
"Hubris: The Inside Story of Spin, Scandal, and the Selling of the Iraq War".
Hopiakuta 16:22, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Michael_Scheuer]] [[Imperial_Hubris]] [[hubris]] [[David_Corn]] [[Michael_Isikoff]] 
Talk:Villa Romano

message: Hi, in the Italian Wikipedia an article about this topic is currently going to be deleted, after some users verified that this villa has no encyclopedic value, no particular relevance, no reason to be mentioned in an encyclopedia. This applies to this page and to a group of articles all regarding Monteroni's countryside (these articles were probably created just for indirect advertising, since some of the villas are used for "bed and breakfast" services):
*Villa Romano - :it:Villa Romano
*Villa Carelli-Palombi - :it:Villa Carelli-Palombi
*Villa Urselli - :it:Villa Urselli
*Villa Bruni - :it:Villa Bruni
*Villa Saetta - :it:Villa Saetta
*Villa de Giorgi - :it:Villa De Giorgi
I'd dare suggest to check whether to delete it here too. - g 22:33, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Villa De Giorgi

message: Hi, in the Italian Wikipedia an article about this topic is currently going to be deleted, after some users verified that this villa has no encyclopedic value, no particular relevance, no reason to be mentioned in an encyclopedia. This applies to this page and to a group of articles all regarding Monteroni's countryside (these articles were probably created just for indirect advertising, since some of the villas are used for "bed and breakfast" services):
*Villa Romano - :it:Villa Romano
*Villa Carelli-Palombi - :it:Villa Carelli-Palombi
*Villa Urselli - :it:Villa Urselli
*Villa Bruni - :it:Villa Bruni
*Villa Saetta - :it:Villa Saetta
*Villa de Giorgi - :it:Villa De Giorgi
I'd dare suggest to check whether to delete it here too. - g 22:33, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Villa Carelli-Palombi

message: Hi, in the Italian Wikipedia an article about this topic is currently going to be deleted, after some users verified that this villa has no encyclopedic value, no particular relevance, no reason to be mentioned in an encyclopedia. This applies to this page and to a group of articles all regarding Monteroni's countryside (these articles were probably created just for indirect advertising, since some of the villas are used for "bed and breakfast" services):
*Villa Romano - :it:Villa Romano
*Villa Carelli-Palombi - :it:Villa Carelli-Palombi
*Villa Urselli - :it:Villa Urselli
*Villa Bruni - :it:Villa Bruni
*Villa Saetta - :it:Villa Saetta
*Villa de Giorgi - :it:Villa De Giorgi
I'd dare suggest to check whether to delete it here too. - g 22:33, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Villa Urselli

message: Hi, in the Italian Wikipedia an article about this topic is currently going to be deleted, after some users verified that this villa has no encyclopedic value, no particular relevance, no reason to be mentioned in an encyclopedia. This applies to this page and to a group of articles all regarding Monteroni's countryside (these articles were probably created just for indirect advertising, since some of the villas are used for "bed and breakfast" services):
*Villa Romano - :it:Villa Romano
*Villa Carelli-Palombi - :it:Villa Carelli-Palombi
*Villa Urselli - :it:Villa Urselli
*Villa Bruni - :it:Villa Bruni
*Villa Saetta - :it:Villa Saetta
*Villa de Giorgi - :it:Villa De Giorgi
I'd dare suggest to check whether to delete it here too. - g 22:34, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Villa Bruni

message: Hi, in the Italian Wikipedia an article about this topic is currently going to be deleted, after some users verified that this villa has no encyclopedic value, no particular relevance, no reason to be mentioned in an encyclopedia. This applies to this page and to a group of articles all regarding Monteroni's countryside (these articles were probably created just for indirect advertising, since some of the villas are used for "bed and breakfast" services):
*Villa Romano - :it:Villa Romano
*Villa Carelli-Palombi - :it:Villa Carelli-Palombi
*Villa Urselli - :it:Villa Urselli
*Villa Bruni - :it:Villa Bruni
*Villa Saetta - :it:Villa Saetta
*Villa de Giorgi - :it:Villa De Giorgi
I'd dare suggest to check whether to delete it here too. - g 22:34, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Villa Saetta

message: Hi, in the Italian Wikipedia an article about this topic is currently going to be deleted, after some users verified that this villa has no encyclopedic value, no particular relevance, no reason to be mentioned in an encyclopedia. This applies to this page and to a group of articles all regarding Monteroni's countryside (these articles were probably created just for indirect advertising, since some of the villas are used for "bed and breakfast" services):
*Villa Romano - :it:Villa Romano
*Villa Carelli-Palombi - :it:Villa Carelli-Palombi
*Villa Urselli - :it:Villa Urselli
*Villa Bruni - :it:Villa Bruni
*Villa Saetta - :it:Villa Saetta
*Villa de Giorgi - :it:Villa De Giorgi
I'd dare suggest to check whether to delete it here too. - g 22:34, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tai Solarin university of education

message: The new statement, "It is now the premier university of education in Nigeria, and second in Africa" (spelling corrected) seems POV to me, and unlikely to be true for so recent a university. Universities anywhere, and certainly in Nigeria, take time to become "premier". It needs a source. Until one is forthcoming I am deleting it. It can always be copied back from this talk page. --Bduke 22:37, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Bruce Gray (sculptor)

message: —Sango123 (e) 22:40, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

message: Note that this is apparently an autobiographical article that points to the author's own website as its only information source.  This is highly in appropriate for a Wikipedia article.  Perhaps the subject is worthy of an article.  However, the information sources used to support this claim for notability must come from some source other than a self-promoting website.  Rklawton 22:06, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Emma E. Booker Elementary School

message: Seriously, though, this is supposed to be an article about the school, I expected this article to contain information about the school itself and about the time when President Bush visited it during the 9/11 attacks. So, if a school is somehow related to 9/11 it's rendered worth less (or even worthless) for its own article? --84.249.252.211 22:40, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect 

message: Commons:Deletion requests/File:George W. Bush being told about second plane hitting WTC.png czar 06:23, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image deletion 
Talk:Take My Hand, Precious Lord

message: Aretha recorded a two part version that was release on her 1956 Songs of Faith Lp. It was also released as a her very first single the same year.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Miketlow (talk • contribs) 02:21, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aretha's first version date incorrect  

message: Take My Hand (song by Toto) is also the music used for the end-credits in David Lynch's Dune (soundtrack) but it does not have a specific Wikipedia entry and I cannot see how to add a cross-reference/disambiguating link for that... SlySven (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 12:27, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another disambiguation link needed? 

message: Would the original writings of Take my hand precious lord be worth anything ? 2600:1700:BA40:4DE0:5DFF:E357:A400:B4B9 (talk) 12:27, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thomas Dorsey
Talk:Augusto Monterroso

message: I wouldn't want to override a decision while I don't know much about the article's topic, so I won't change, only ask:
Is there a specific reason that this isn't marked as a stub?
I'm sure Senior Monterroso didn't get all this recognition for one 1-sentence story, as interesting as its concept may be, but the lack of other information or expansion on other information creates the illussion that most of what that man has created was this one sentence.
Until someone expands on it, I believe it deserves a "stub" tag to avoid such confusion..
p.s. just an anecdote: Technically, since the whole story is one sentence, quoting the whole sentence isn't "fair use". But I believe Wikipedia will be forgiven for that ;-)
(i'm joking of course)
AilaG 22:45, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stub? 

message: Is Monterroso's story really the shortest ever? Ernest Hemingway once wrote a story that read: "For sale: baby shoes, never worn." That's six words. See Flash fiction. Leo44 (talk) 22:24, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  shortest story 
Talk:Twins ballpark

message: Why does this page keep getting deleted? Jonathan 22:46, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Once the stadium bill is approved and signed by the governor let us know here and I'll unprotect the page. Since you didn't provide Wikilinks to the other proposed stadiums, I can't access their validity. But this article was deleted and protected because it was speculation and original research, not merely because the stadium doesn't yet exist.--Alabamaboy 20:43, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've unprotected the page. Best,--Alabamaboy 23:01, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Vassilis Tsitsanis

message: I think a new article should be written with a title of 'Vasilis Tsitsanis'. Vasilis is written with one 's' only and Vassilis is not an ISO represetation of the Greek name using Latin characters. Thus a lot of people will try to find out information using 'Vasilis' instead of Vassilis and will be confused.
*I strongly agree. Where does this "Vassilis" come from. His name is Vasilis Tsitsanis in whatever romanization of his name you can choose Brunswicknic (talk) 13:24, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Disagree. "Vassilis" is a common traditionnal romanization for Βασίλης (cf example , ,  and a lot more on Vassilios), probably for phonetical reasons (to match the pronunciation and avoid saying "Vazilis"). Furthermore the artist is known under this for of Romanization : https://www.amazon.com/Rembetika-Vol-3-Vassilis-Tsitsanis/dp/B001BJ65UI, so there is no need to adopt a purist attitude here.--Phso2 (talk) 16:17, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

text: Yes, thanks for the dialogue Phso2, people seem to have used it, yet in Romanization of Greek there is no mention of the double ss being a transliteration of sigma. Looking at the page Vassilios, there are a lot of Vassilis's. But nevertheless, the transliteration of the name is Vasilis Tsitsanis. I note Mao Zedong is given the now orthodox transliteration. And I repeat, in all transliteration schema listed for Romanization of Greek, including for Ancient Greek, single sigma becomes single s. I think we should respect the Greek name, not ignorant (not referring to a person, but to general lack of knowledge) and non-orthodox romanisation of it. This would not be the case for Greek migrants to other lands who adopt new spellings and become famous under that name (Spiro Agnew, George Michael for instance) Brunswicknic (talk) 10:57, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Transliteration is intended for scientific or technical purposes. Here it is not a transliteration, but a transcription, a less systematic way of rendering the original langage, with some advantages of his own (closer to the original pronunciation and more foreign-speaker friendly) and some drawback (less systematic and not reversible). It also "respects the Greek name" as much as others, and the Greek people given as examples use it.--Phso2 (talk) 12:05, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Function point analysis

message: From COSMIC homepage: "cosmicon.com expired on 11/04/2007 and is pending renewal or deletion."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.241.13.151 (talk) 14:05, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken link 

message: Maybe nice to add a reference to IFPUG on this page. Although both methods are quite the same, I think both should be mentioned. --Van der Hoorn 12:20, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  IFPUG 

message: From the article:
"All about the method Function Point Analysis may be found on the website of the NESMA and is not repeated here. Issues addressed include:"
In my opinion these issues should also be addressed on Wikipedia and not just as a reference to the NESMA website.
--Van der Hoorn 13:15, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explanation of method
Talk:Backbone network

message: Is there any need for this article in addition to Internet backbone and a Wiktionary entry? Nurg 22:50, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Is this article needed?

message: Yes we need this but we certainly do not need collapsed backbone, parallel backbone, distributed backbone, serial backbone. They should all be merged into here. It is much easier to compare and contrast if they are dealt with together.
And above all we need pictures - diagrams for each of the types of networks. — RHaworth  20:37, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge + pics 

message: need more explanation and reference.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sumitsharma8 (talk • contribs) 09:41, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  no merging needed, just need to expand it.