lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Desert Patrol Vehicle

message: The Jeep and the M151 are COMPLETELY different vehicles.
This is a Jeep:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/b/bf/JeepwwII01.jpg
This is an M151:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d8/JeepFrontM151.jpg
The two vehicles are so dissimilar it's not even funny. I'll just mention the obvious stuff: The M151 has a steel sheet-metal uni-body structure, unlike the original Jeep which was a steel tub bolted onto a steel frame. Additionally, the grille designs between the two vehicles is completely different. The Jeep was a WWII-era design; the M151 was a Cold War vehicle. The Marine Corps used modified M151s as Fast Attack Vehicles, not Jeeps. They are not the same thing. CeeWhy2 05:17, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Jeep vs. M151

message: an AT 4 is not a rocket Launcher, its technically a recoilless rifle.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 156.110.35.146 (talk) 23:52, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  AT 4 

message: I found some pictures of the "seal dune buggy", I wonder whether this is a different version of the DPV (exterior appearance seems different; also note the large platforms next to buggy) Then again, I might be wrong as comparisation is quite difficult because of the blackness of the vehicles.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.246.180.130 (talk) 09:24, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Seal Dune buggy

message: Considering how the article seems to be concentrated more on the FAV than the DPV, I suggest that maybe we should make a seperate article on the FAV and have this article mainly based on the DPV. Currently also Fast Attack Vehicle redirects here. Nohomers48 (talk) 21:49, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Due to recent changes in the article it is no longer needed to divide this article. Nohomers48 (talk) 06:30, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Fast Attack Vehicle

message: The two articles that I have found are in contradiction. A third source needs to be found to verify which information is correct. Globalsecurities.org state the vehicle has a 130 Hp engine while the about.com article written by a US military contributer, states the vehicle has a 200 hp engine. A third or even fourth article would be very helpful if someone is able to locate one. If not the sources must be evaluated to determine which has a higher credibility on the subject matter. I'm working on it every now and then but feel free to help out.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by Smith0790 (talk • contribs) 22:14, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Source Cleanup

message: What is it  now: A maximum of 60 miles per hour as in the Quick-Facts-Box? Or does it travel up to 80 mph, as in  the Performance-§ in the text?
And BTW, the aircooled "Volkswagen-Engine": Happens to be a flat-four or what? 46.114.6.106 (talk) 08:12, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Top Speed
Talk:Steve Bellán

message: "Other than Bellán in Troy, the league was lily-white."
:That line remains in the article, the gist of a few sentences that I have otherwise deleted, beginning "More than fifty years before Jackie Robinson."  Is there any reason to doubt that Bellan was lily-white? --P64 03:01, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Bellán was white.  Until 1900 the Cuban League was a segregated, whites-only league. BRMo 03:14, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  lily-white 

message: Several sources give October 1, 1949 as the DOB, such as [Wikipedia]- which includes two good references (one from the student registry at St John's/Fordham, the other from his passport).  I have changed it here to the more specific date.The Original Historygeek (talk) 20:15, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops! Yes, BRMo- I meant that to be 1849, not 1949! The Original Historygeek (talk) 22:14, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  DOB
Talk:Rhombidodecadodecahedron

message: <BLOCKQUOTE>
In 1994, the Flemish geometrician Hayward Grümiswald Schmeitenschtült discovered a revolutionary way to use the rhombidodecadodecahedron as a disco ball...
</BLOCKQUOTE>
Tom Ruen 03:02, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I just lol'd big time. Professor M. Fiendish, Esq. 14:08, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed nonsense
Talk:Milemarker (band)

message: This article was nominated for deletion with an outcome of "speedy keep". Capitalistroadster 04:36, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: AFD nomination

message: Satanic Versus is not a full-length album. It was promoted as an EP, and only has six songs. 
However, it is a very good EP.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.172.52.211 (talk) 22:26, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Satanic Versus
Talk:Borderline (magazine)

message: I flagged the page as having Marketspeak but checking the link I see a lot of this is because the key sections (like the opening and closing sections) are lifted verbatim from here. Given the obvious copy violation and the tone of the content I think this needs a radical rewrite. (Emperor 11:38, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I am intrigued by that claim as I have no vested interest (I'd not heard about it before stumbling across it on a general tidy-up) and if you, or any other user, has concerns I did then they are free to ask for a second opinion on the Comics Project talk page but I can assure you my only interest is making all the entries as high quality as possible. Reading the comment below and double checking edit history you are right that the blog post is actually taken from here which is fine (I missed it as the text was tiny) and you'll notice I didn't actually flag this up as actual copyright violation - I was expressing a concern. That said the entry is still written like an advert and needs to be re-written to fit with the standards expected of an encyclopedia. Again if you think I have some kind of agenda then you are welcome to request further opions on the Comics Project talk page and I'd be more than happy to go with the consensus opinion from there. (Emperor 21:46, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copy violation?
Talk:Timeline of the Japanese invasions of Korea (1592–1598)

message: Let's get rid of the biographical contents in the timeline. (Wikimachine 14:49, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Some of the dates here appear to be using the Koreanlunisolar calendar and some of them appear to be using the Gregorian calendar.  Is someone who understands the Korean calendar far better than I interested in rationalizing this and listing which is used?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:602:8800:988A:B4FB:6B44:90AA:DF9D (talk) 04:10, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Dates?
Talk:Epistle of Barnabas

message: The Epistle of Barnabas should be put on the internet for free, and made easy to find.  The Gospel of Barnabas is available that way, and many people I suspect mistake it for the the Epistle.
:This anonymous reader has not looked through the article's External links. --Wetman 05:20, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm puzzled about the presence of these three navigation templates at the end of this article:
Since the Epistle of Barnabas does not appear to belong to the RC canon of the New Testament, why are these templates here? Thanks. --TraceyR (talk) 20:00, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Part of Roman Catholic Canon? 

message: First, thanks for editing the other cites!  And in general, adding in sourced journal stuff is cool.
That said...  I think this might be UNDUE?  The Journal of Theological Studies is Oxford's in-house arm, and John Finnis is an emeritus at Oxford.  An emeritus publishing outside his area of expertise, too - he's obviously interested in a lot of stuff, but his main area of expertise is theoretically law.  Nobody else argues for such an early date, and it doesn't make tons of sense - if it was written between 30-70, why would the rebuilding of the Temple be put in the future tense?  The Second Temple would have been right there.  Along with the million and one reasons to place this in later Christianity rather than the earliest Christianity.  I think this source is sufficiently off the rails that we just shouldn't include it at all.  (But...  don't want to make it seem like I'm defending the current state of the article, if you're interested in adding sources it'd be great!  Just...  not this one. ;-) )   Any thoughts?  SnowFire (talk) 01:47, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: @SnowFire: Thanks for your comment. I didn't know about who John Finnis was, but I was impressed after reading his article as he makes a very detailed case for his thesis. He also makes a case for understanding the reference to the rebuilding of the Temple as a vaticinium ex eventu description of Zerubabbel's reconstruction of the Temple of Jerusalem. I don't know if my addition of Finnis' article is UNDUE; I personally think of it as a piece of recent scholarship reassessing prior work on the topic. It was also published in a very prestigious, peer-reviewed academic journal published by Oxford University Press. That said, I don't know if that is sufficient to establish his theory as significant enough to deserve a mention in Wikipedia. What is your opinion about this? Potatín5 (talk) 21:56, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Finnis source
Talk:Orders of magnitude (density)

message: Shouldn't the average human density be 0.9xx kg/m^3? Since humans are capable of floating in water I doubt the density will be close to 1000.--2ltben 03:22, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Human density

message: There seems to be uncertainty about the actual density of iridium and how it was calculated.  See the article on iridium for the info.
: -84user (talk) 15:23, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Iridium

message: Is two orders of magnitude too low. 10e-14 torr is about 80 pPa which is sth like 1e-16 Pa. Not sure how to edit tables so sorry for not correcting it myself.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.173.154.109 (talk) 20:41, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Best vacuum from a laboratory (1 pPa)
Talk:Kruder & Dorfmeister

message: Although Tosca and Peace Orchestra are undoubtedly related to K&D, should their respective discographies and other information be included on the K&D page? Both have pages of their own. Smilesfozwood (talk) 22:01, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I've rename the section to try to better reflect its current content. -- Bovineone (talk) 17:56, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Tosca and Peace Orchestra

message: The history section pretty much says absolutely nothing about their history.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.5.188.169 (talk) 13:16, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I've rename the section to try to better reflect its current content. -- Bovineone (talk) 17:56, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: History
Wikipedia talk:Department directory

message: The substantial recent edits to this directory seem to have largely lost the concept of "departments" which were presumably the main reason for this directory as distinct from the various other directories.  Previous editors have presumably found some value in such a concept, so I wonder whether some discussion may have been wise before removing the previous content? --David Biddulph (talk) 05:34, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: We seem to have this problem in  few places..plus many links no longer go to what editor are useto. Moxy (talk) 05:12, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: After looking at this quivk....we have some real problems...aside from the content being off,,,redirects all messed up...the talk page link at Wikipedia:Directory takes us to here. Thinking a mass revert may be best....going to look at this more before I do more reverts.Moxy (talk) 06:53, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Very useful   (talk) Truthspeakerknows (talk) 03:00, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edits to this directory
Talk:Pennsylvania Route 29

message: Agree.  Other articles such as US 422 are split into two sections about the two different 422s.  --myselfalso 03:29, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: More examples of articles about routes split into two segments include New York State Route 24 and New Jersey Route 440. --TMF T - C 04:39, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I really like what this article has turned into.  --myselfalso 18:37, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nice Job
Talk:Mal Sharpe

message: Open Source (radio show) recently did a show with Mal Sharpe as a guest.
Guests: Jesse Thorn, Mal Sharpe, and Robert Thompson. 
Subject of discussion: Cringe humor, Coyle & Sharpe, Borat, Colbert Roasts Bush.
Open Source is produced in association with UMass Lowell and Open Source Media, Inc., and airs on American Public Radio. 
It is licensed under Creative Commons.
In the interests of full disclosure, I'm a producer with the show.  
I leave it to an admin to discern whether this should be included as a relevant reference. 
If this is the improper way to offer references, please let me know. Thanks, La Rue w. ROS 19:12, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mal Sharpe interview. 
Talk:Bruce Haack

message: changed the section title  'From Party Machine to Death Machine' to 'From Death Machine to Party Machine'. Death Machine came out much earlier than Party Machine. and i guess OP was thinking it was a good idea because Haack died slightly after, but i like the idea that he was thinking about death for a while, but, over the years, he became more interested in parties. anyway, it's all chronological now.
-----
Why is Bruce listed under the Norway project? As far as I know, there's no connection. 76.24.29.157 (talk) 18:29, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "From Death Machine to Party Machine" 

message: test  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.125.110.223 (talk) 20:47, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  *I 

message: the article about the documentary is currently a sub-stub! should really be merged with this unless further developed.  --Kaini (talk) 23:35, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge 

message: test  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.125.110.223 (talk) 20:47, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  *I 

message: the article about the documentary is currently a sub-stub! should really be merged with this unless further developed.  --Kaini (talk) 23:35, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge 

message: I'm no expert on the subject, and it's pretty ingrained in the article, so I'm not going to change it, but saying that Bruce was going to U Alberta at the age of 12 sounds not quite right to me.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.67.7.35 (talk) 00:34, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  University at 12? 

message: This edit, representing most of this article, appears to be a massive copy-paste copyvio from pages 228 and 229 of this book.  Planning to revert to the prior state, and allow the article to grow appropriately.  -- Scray (talk) 17:01, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Concern about copyright violation
Talk:Mouse on Mars

message: The intro says
"Their music also utilizes live conventional instruments such as strings, brass, drums, bass and guitar."
Is this meant to that when they perform live they make use of conventional instruments?
Or is 'live' used as a kind of adjective here, such that the sentence effectively means they use conventional instruments in their music?
if it's the former, I'd suggest a change like
"In their live shows, they also make use of conventional instruments such as strings, brass, drums, bass and guitar."
if the later
"Their music also utilizes conventional instruments such as strings, brass, drums, bass and guitar."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamesrcole (talk • contribs) 09:03, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ambiguity 

message: I added an image, does anyone have any live photos of them? Anything is better then this one.Andrzejbanas 06:55, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I had a couple I took at one of their shows in 04, but they weren't very good photos... I'll see if I can find them though. --141.154.19.5 22:23, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The page doesn't have "(music band)" or something like that added to the title. Should there be a disambiguation message on top of the page? I don't think there are other pages on Wikipedia with the same title, but there is at least one other "Mouse on Mars" (a cartoon). In fact, I've never heard of this band... 82.30.217.33 (talk) 14:56, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation? 

message: The redirect Sonig has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Jalen Folf (talk) 06:52, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Sonig]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Kid606

message: The reference to collaborations and participations includes links to Arial and DISC neither of which are the right targets. I guess they don't have their own pages. -- Beardo 05:45, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Groups 

message: * https://web.archive.org/web/20180519012104/http://www.rojaro.com/searchname2.php?name=kid+606&searchtype=exact&maxhits=100
czar 10:15, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  More sources to ILL
Talk:Stanley Adams (actor)

message: Removing this description since, while technically accurate, is neither sited nor NPOV. Size, unless cited, shouldn't be included in such an amateurish manner. Chalchiuhtlatonal (talk) 23:16, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: The Rotund Adams

message: Do Trekkies invade every one of these articles? It seems as if every article on anyone with a glancing connection Star Trek has that listed as the main thing they're "known for".  I feel like putting this up front every damned time tends to diminish the rest of their careers. MrNeutronSF (talk) 09:34, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Star Trek Star Trek Star Trek ... enough!
Talk:Tim Burstall

message: I have added citations from the obituary I had...but haven't sourced existing statements not covering by the obituarySterry2607 (talk) 23:14, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.milesago.com/Obits/burstall-tim.htm. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Money emoji💵Talk💸Help out at CCI!  15:01, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Surrounded by Thieves

message: I removed the deprecated review parameter from the main infobox and inserted the reviews into article space, per []. First time using this format, let me know if you spot any problems or feel free to fix them yourself. Fean (talk) 07:56, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  New reception section 
Talk:The Art of Self Defense (album)

message: I checked both the original and the repress and both albums say The Art of Self Defense (no dash). I suggest this be moved to The Art of Self Defense (album). Any objections? Olliegrind 03:06, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No one seems to object so I moved the article. Olliegrind 19:28, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:This Way for the Gas, Ladies and Gentlemen

message: I was adding to Reading List for Literature not written in english for wikiversity, and discovered that there is no entry for what is perhaps the most stunning of all Holocaust narratives, with the possible exception of MAUS and the unexpurgated version of Anne Frank's diary.  funny, horrifying, and unshirking, This way for the gas is an unforgettable read, and people should know about it.  --Smithgrrl 04:14, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: September 2006
Talk:Flying Phantom Ship

message: Here is Japanese Wiki page for this movie:
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E7%A9%BA%E9%A3%9B%E3%81%B6%E3%82%86%E3%81%86%E3%82%8C%E3%81%84%E8%88%B9
Could anybody add it?
85.223.255.200 04:01, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: While reading the article and curious as always i have found that the link near by was pointing to the wrong article. This is the right article  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.100.203.109 (talk) 02:07, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Invalid link near "Directed by"
Talk:Vic Perrin

message: This article states that Vic Perrin was the original narrator at Spaceship Earth at Epcot. This attribution lacks any citation to a source. 
The Wikipedia article about Spaceship Earth states that upon its opening in 1982 "the attraction featured actor Lawrence Dobkin as the narrator along with a very simple and quiet orchestral composition throughout the attraction."  Perrin is nowhere mentioned as the narrator. 
The Orlando Sentinel report of his death mentioned his voice was heard in the preshow at the "Exxon pavilion."  See https://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/os-xpm-1989-07-07-8907070487-story.html  This is likely a reference to the original version of the Universe of Energy (prior to the Elen Degeneres show), which was sponsored by Exxon.  
Unless someone can provide a citation to the original statement, it should be deleted.
Jnmwiki (talk) 15:48, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Epcot