lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Twice a Fortnight

message: As this article is about a television series. I feel that it could be better covered as part of a TelevisionWikiProject.
Is a TelevisionWikiProject proposed for some time in the future, for television programs?  Thanks. Figaro 00:05, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

message: Does it really deserve a template box like that ?  Seems excessive. -- Beardo 07:45, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Why would it be excessive? Garion96 (talk) 22:11, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template box 

message: Twice a Fortnight was a BBC Radio programme. Not a TV programme. Signature tune: "Twice a Fortnight, twenty-four hours a day / Twice a Fortnight, shout hip hip hooray! / One and one makes two / Twice a Fortnight, Twice a Fortnight, Twice a Fortnight we love you." During broadcasts it often referred to itself as "Twice a Fork-knife". Casablanca58 (talk) 15:24, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  TV or Radio show?
Talk:Empire Earth: The Art of Conquest

message: Fixed some material which I felt was inadequately written. Also transferred the campaign summaries from the Empire Earth page to this one. Finally, deleted the "initial reactions" because it was heavily biased (not NPOV) and I felt wasn't worth keeping. Also added the sidebar and uploaded the picture cover. This page is really becoming something interesting. Thunderforge 04:15, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: :GA review (see here for criteria)
#It is reasonably well written.
#:a (prose):  b (MoS): 
#It is factually accurate and verifiable.
#:a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
#It is broad in its coverage.
#:a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
#It follows the neutral point of view policy.
#:a (fair representation):  b (all significant views): 
#It is stable.
#:
#It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
#:a (tagged and captioned):  b lack of images (does not in itself exclude GA):  c (non-free images have fair use rationales): 
#Overall: 
#:a Pass/Fail: 
Good job; it could stand for a copy-edit and some more research/expansion for FA, but it's definitely GA material. — Deckiller 03:05, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: appears no significant copy edit has been done so I'll take a look at it now  --carelesshx talk 13:42, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Copy edit done, normalised spelling to US English as per WP:ENGVAR. Removed inuse tag, added LoCE tag to talk page. Notified User:Clyde Miller to proofread  --carelesshx talk 16:56, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GApassed
Talk:How to Irritate People

message: Check TV shows "The Frost Report", "At Last the 1948 Show" and "Do Not Adjust Your Set"
This one-episode special was made by David Frost's production company and included many of the participants in the above.
Also the touring show "I'm Sorry I'll Read That Again" will assist in your understanding of the genre and participants.  I don't think video exists of ISIRTA exists, but the audio has been released commercially - I have the LP record, and it's probably going to have been released on CD.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheBustopher (talk • contribs) 13:51, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  At Last the 1948 Show
Talk:Full Circle with Michael Palin

message: Is there any known reason why they totally skipped Middle America? They took quite some detours to visit as many countries as possible pretty much everywhere along the journey, but then they jump from Ecuador to Mexico, skipping Panama, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Belize, Nicaragua, Honduras, ...  WHY? After all, that makes the "Full Circle" rather a "Broken Circle". --80.134.69.190 (talk) 18:13, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Why did they skip Middle America?
Talk:The Money Pit

message: I'm reasonably sure that the ending sequence is a shot of Villa Vizcaya, but Miami is not listed as a shooting location...  ComputerGeezer (talk) 00:13, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Paraguay, Rio, or Miami

message: — Assignment last updated by RAT1981 (talk) 21:25, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Honors English 250H VL1
Talk:Turner & Hooch

message: hooch was brindle, right?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.82.110.73 (talk) 03:42, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Brindle?

message: How come the summary makes no mentions of Hooch's death or Scott and the Veterinarian getting married? Matthew Cantrell (talk) 22:56, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Summary 

message: Thanks. 18:53, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please add Wikilink to [[Dogue de Bordeaux]] 

message: My name is Mark Shuler and I was a featured extra (wedding photographer) in the wedding scene. The two other French mastiffs were named Barry and Egor and they were rotated out with Beasley.  My recollection is one was better at barking, one was a jumper, and Beasley was in most of the close ups.   At least two 50lb bags of bird seed were used for the bride and groom's exit of the "Church" which was a refitted real estate office.  Filming of the wedding scene took three days to go from Hooch running across the street to the commandeering of the vehicle to chase the suspect. (At the time I was an actual wedding photographer as well as an actor)  
73.200.172.197 (talk) 20:22, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:13, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 7 April 2016 

message: (Scott had earlier speculated that Amos' murderer must of had special experience in killing as the stab wound performed on Amos ensured total discretion).
"must of' should be "must have" Tikatu (talk) 03:48, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Done Grammatical error only. —KuyaBriBriTalk 04:24, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 13 May 2017 

message: The article states, "A pilot for a Turner & Hooch television series, starring Tom Wilson and Beasley the Dog, was made and ran as a part of The Magical World of Disney."  Yet when you click on the link to Tom Wilson, it takes you to an article about an actor who died in 1965.  Either you have the wrong Tom Wilson, or this link is faulty.  67.45.112.95 (talk) 17:31, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to "Tom Wilson" is faulty. 

message: Change Disney+ premiere date from July 16 to July 21, 2021. Reference https://tvline.com/2021/06/16/disney-plus-release-day-wednesdays-schedule-change-loki/ Acohena (talk) 00:51, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Done Corrected the date, as described by the article. Mason 39 (talk) 04:57, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 20 July 2021
Talk:Transgender flag

message: This is my personal anecdote.
The creator of the flag posted it on their website in 2008. The wiki article was made in 2006, so it was known before then.
I nominated the wiki article for deletion in 2011. That deletion discussion identified all the references to the flag which we could find on the Internet at the time. As the references show, the flag really did not exist in published media at the time. It was unknown.
Wikipedia's article for transgender gets a lot of pageviews. It is one of the most popular articles in Wikipedia, and probably the single most consulted source of information on the concept of "transgender" in the world. After this article got established showing that flag, the flag eventually became the illustration for that article and a minor illustration on many transgender articles. From there 100s of millions of people saw it over the years as the official trans symbol since Wikipedia said it was. It is a case of circular reporting. There were other trans symbols, but Wikipedia adopted this one. I think it came to Wikipedia from Tumblr, which was more popular at the time and which was a very LGBT+ community and platform.
About the conversation for which symbol is the official trans symbol - it is this 1999 flag, because Wikipedia is the global authority which decides such things, and we decided on this flag in 2011. If Wikipedia views are a proxy of uptake then this one is 100,000 times more popular than all the others put together. It felt really odd at the time keeping it but I think things turned out well. The flag is highly recognizable and most people love it. It is a great symbol.  Bluerasberry (talk) 00:30, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: This should probably be added to the list of citogenesis incidents. Flounder fillet (talk) 01:33, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I added it at special:diff/1217309410/1226069955  Bluerasberry (talk) 11:32, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Origin of popularity is Wikipedia
Talk:Radio Flyer (film)

message: What year does this film take place exactly??? The '60s/'70s? It had that sort-of feel to it. And would it be considered a nostalgic film? Ace Fighter 18:50, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Time Period

message: I know this is hard to believe, but I do recall at one point someone was going to make a video game based on this movie that was going to involve moving around in the wagon and shooting things.
This game, however, never came to be released and was supposedly scrapped during it's production. Again, may be hard to believe, but it's true. ^^; --Ralf Loire (Annoy) 17:16, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nah, that's totally believable. There was a whole spat of licensed video games like this based on movies or cartoons that make no sense so I believe it. 166.198.111.49 (talk) 07:19, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Video game 

message: Should there really be a section speculating possible hidden meanings? If so, should it be put in its own section?
My opinion is that the section is not needed. It is pure speculation, and any hidden meaning has been denied by the director. If this were a star wars film or any other such film, the information given by the director would be considered canon.  Hr.VankerTalkContrib 05:47, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speculation 

message: Who is Shane?! Multiple parts in the Plot it mentions a Shane. There is no Shane in this movie. 2603:9001:6303:2C7:415A:8940:D9AC:8C3D (talk) 16:00, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot
Talk:The Celluloid Closet (film)

message: This article seems to be incorrect.  The main article for this name should be about the book.   A disambiguation page should lead to Celluloid Closet (film), containing this article, as it is about the book. Qvamp (talk) 20:51, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  bad entry 

message: the list of films is amazingly incomplete.  is there a reason why the person who did it didn't indicated that?  does anyone care to watch it and complete it?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.162.133.132 (talk) 07:56, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  If  you noticed  it was incomplete then presumably you know which films are missing! Why don't you help fill in the blanks! Jackbox1971 (talk) 17:16, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've just added significantly to the list of films discussed; I think the list is now complete. I noticed in the history of the page that the film list has alternately grown and shrunk. On at least one occasion all films were removed with the complaint that the list was too long. A complete list is long, and an incomplete list is shorter--which is more desirable? DaveDFW (talk) 18:12, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  film list 

message: I was thinking about changing the list of films in the movie to be a sortable table with columns for year, title, (and maybe director or writer)? Would this be useful so that readers can at a glance see the chronological order of films presented and to get a sense of what time periods of cinema were talked about? Umimmak (talk) 01:27, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Film list - sortable table?
Talk:The Polar Express (film)

message: Hello! I"m wanting to possibly promote the article to GA status, however I would like to know what specific improvements people think should be made to it first so that it isn't a waste of GA reviewer's time if the article is no where close to GA. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 21:10, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improvements to the article 

message: The marketing section is missing that the movie was explicitly marketed to evangelical pastors by WB as a preaching tool:
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2004/12/is-the-polar-express-an-evangelical-film.html Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 20:04, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to add it then. Being "retired" doesn't stop you from making WP:BOLD edits. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 20:14, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Christianity metaphor 

message: Within the Plot section, can someone add the songs when they occur and who sings them. 2607:FB91:99A:870D:8CEA:6B21:7C66:BCD (talk) 15:21, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Songs 

message: The hobo is almost identical to A-No.1 North Americas famous Hobo-Tramp. Watch Emperor of the North. 2601:8C0:702:8DC0:34A3:91E3:649A:9278 (talk) 17:14, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: What/Where/How? Need more details on the change or addition you are suggesting. Also, are there sources discussing this "Hobo" connection? --GoneIn60 (talk) 18:31, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hobo 

message: Marketing->The Polar Express Experience: the last sentence of the first paragraph states “2015 was the final year of operation for the Polar Express Experience and Wild Arctic has since operated on a year-round schedule.” and should state ”2015 was the final year of operation for the Polar Express Experience and since then Wild Arctic operated on a year-round schedule until closing in 2020. ” Sources: Wild Arctic page, https://www.orlandoweekly.com/arts/seaworld-orlandos-decrepit-wild-arctic-simulator-isnt-long-for-this-world-30118835 152.208.60.158 (talk) 10:08, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 17 December 2023 

message: For all the editors that keep adding this to the lead, please stop. This is an early development that may or may not ever see the light of day. Typically we wait until sequels enter production before we mention up in the lead. The same should be done here. If you disagree, discuss your concerns here. --GoneIn60 (talk) 22:02, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Sequel information
Talk:The Absent-Minded Waiter

message: "Martin also recreated this sketch during one of his hosting appearances on Saturday Night Live in the late '70s."
All of Steve Martin's '70s appearances are now on DVD & this statment is not true.
The closes sketch has Gilda Radner & Steve Martin as customers & Dan Ackroyd as an annoying waiter.KaBluie (talk) 14:46, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
Talk:The Absent-Minded Professor

message: The unhphenated title was apparently taken from IMDb. The movie poster (and proper grammar) spells it with a hyphen, as does TVGuide.com/movies/.  Since IMDb is only partly reliable, and TVGuide.com is generally more credible since it's done by professional journalists and editors rather than hobbyist volunteers, I've added the hyphen. Does anyone have a video of the film itself for final confirmation? -- Tenebrae 17:42, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I have a video, complete with hyphen.MarianKroy (talk) 20:19, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

text: At least one version of the movie has the title:  The AbsentMinded Professor  with the M capitalized and no space between the t and the M.  Black and white version at https://archive.org/details/TheAbsentMindedProfessor1961Xvid   agb  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.233.167.63 (talk) 19:54, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Hyphen

message: Should it be said to be an original film? It seems to bear a striking resemblance to the Walter Tevis story The Big Bounce.
http://www.gutenberg.org/files/23153/23153-h/23153-h.htm  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nickpheas (talk • contribs) 16:23, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The Big Bounce was published in Galaxy Science Fiction, February 1958. This was three years before the movie.  The source for the bouncing energy was different.  This story is readily available.  agb  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.233.167.63 (talk) 20:06, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Walter Tevis short story

message: According to the Wikipedia article Absent-minded professor, the film is based on the short story A Situation of Gravity by Samuel W. Taylor. WilliamSommerwerck (talk) 14:08, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The movie version at archive.org has as the last of the opening credits:  Screenplay by Bill Walsh based on a story by Samuel W. Taylor.  agb  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.233.167.63 (talk) 20:31, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Samuel W. Taylor short story
Talk:The Happiest Millionaire

message: Moving here, per WP:PRESERVE, til it can be reliably sourced
;Disneyland influence
The songs "Let's Have a Drink on It" and "Fortuosity" are used in the Main Street USA loops at the Disneyland-style parks.
The phone booth Mrs. Worth uses to make a call still exists. It is located inside Club 33 at Disneyland Park. Guests of the Club can use it to make phone calls.
Some of the décor and set pieces from the "Let's Have a Drink on It" bar set were salvaged and placed into the Café Orleans restaurant in Disneyland's New Orleans Square.
Steve Bartek, composer for Disneyland's short-lived "Rocket Rods" attraction, created a special arrangement of the Sherman brothers' "Detroit" song as part of the waiting area entertainment.
-- Jytdog (talk) 19:07, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced 

message: While the Walt's People book series is self-published, Didier Gheiz is a top Disney historian, who wrote the officially licensed They Drew As they Pleased 6-book series. This is a rare exception to self-publishing, where it's still quite valid to cite.  --  Zanimum (talk) 23:00, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Didier Gheiz
Talk:An Act to amend the Copyright Act (38th Canadian Parliament, 1st Session)

message: This article has to say the session and parliament of the bill; there have been many bill C-60s.  It doesn't even give a year now.  Arctic Gnome 05:13, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  When? 
Talk:The Kids Are Alright

message: There is so much overlap between this page and The Kids Are All Right that I think a single dab would suffice.  I think this falls under WP:DABCOMBINE. Hoof Hearted (talk) 13:31, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Support, many readers wouldn't know which spelling they wanted, so it makes sense to combine them. Leschnei (talk) 11:49, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Kids Are All Right
Talk:Patent Act (Canada)

message: Added history and purpose information to the page. More work can be done by adding to the notable cases, and other sections. I am not sure if all the citations on the history are required, I pulled most of it from one source. Perhaps that can be cleaned up at some future time.
S3307a (talk) 05:09, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
Talk:The Rolling Stones Rock and Roll Circus

message: I dispute the claim that Led Zeppelin was to be included. None of the sources listed substantiate this claim. They were a newly-formed and unknown group at the time in the middle of a UK tour without a released album. They were still billed as the "New Yardbirds" for most of 1968. In his biography, Glyn Johns says that he asked Mick Jagger to listen to the Led Zeppelin I album, but he refused.  Rrhea2 (talk) 18:26, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Led Zeppelin? 

message: "The Rolling Stones Rock and Roll Circus is a film released in 1996 of a 11 December 1968 event put together by The Rolling Stones - is this article about the film, or the event itself? Did the event have a name? It's a little point, but it might be useful for clearing up categories etc. -Ashley Pomeroy 18:09, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thing, or thing of thing 

message: It's just my opinion, but the unlikely convergence of 4 of history's greatest rockers on one stage as a single supergroup seems to merit its own page.  If they hadn't given their group a name, it could go either way, but since they did name it, I believe it should stay.Originalname37 (talk) 18:09, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: well said. Kingturtle (talk) 13:26, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do Not Merge the Dirty Mac 

message: describes the (unique) recording of this (unique) event. The album and the recording session are not two different things; so why two articles? MrDemeanour (talk) 08:17, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why two articles
Talk:The Man with Two Brains

message: If I remember correctly, Hfuhruhurr is pronounced [hʌˈfɜɻ] (huh-FUR), and Uumellmahaye is pronounced [juˈmɛɫmeɪ] (yoo-MELL-may).
--Yuunli (talk) 06:26, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronounce

message: Although it is never addressed, the plot to the film closely resembles the plot to Edgar Allan Poe's short story "Ligeia."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.90.230.115 (talk) 14:24, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Connection to Edgar Allan Poe's "Ligeia" 

message: What, if anything, is the connection between this Hfuhruhurr and the one mentioned in Hfuhruhurr? 86.132.221.234 (talk) 22:40, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  I am utterly mystified
Talk:Little Shop of Horrors (1986 film)

message: Not that I think it should go into the article (since it would only be trivia), but I cannot find out who is pictured in the Dentist's shine to his mother, when Steve Martin sings (speaks) the line "Oh, Mama". I know it's a male actor in his 40s~60s who was fairly famous in the 1960s and 1970s, but I can't remember who, and sources like IMDB.com are no help. Any ideas? — Loadmaster (talk) 21:53, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe I have found the identity of Mama (after seeing a recent showing of Support Your Local Sheriff). It is most likely veteran actor Henry Jones . — Loadmaster (talk) 19:42, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mama's picture 

message: Little Shop of Horrors is an American Video Game Developed and Published by RDI Video Systems - Released Through Microsoft Corporation for The MSX in 1986.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:6EF1:57D0:91B9:256B:79BD:73F1 (talk) 15:34, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you provide any evidence of this? Googling for it only turns up things that are written in the same style that you used above. Trivialist (talk) 01:06, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Video Game Released 

message: I noticed that the plot to the original ending is buried in the production section and is not particularly well-written. Is there any  protocol for when an alternate ending is prominent enough to be included in the main plot section, as on the page for I Am Legend? Specialsam110 (talk) 20:14, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original/alternate/Director's Cut ending
Talk:Flubber (film)

message: Front cover says "U" whilst article says "PG". Which countries? which is right?--82.152.248.87 (talk) 23:15, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Intended audience/rating

message: "After a battle filled with slapstick violence (which culminates in the Flubber entering Croft's body and fatally ejecting itself from his anus)... "
THE GUY DIED FROM SHITTING FLUBBER?!129.139.1.68 (talk) 19:07, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Death by flubber

message: Shouldn't Great Oaks be listed in the "Production company" part of the infobox? It also produced the movie.
2605:6000:120E:E1D3:0:222A:66BC:2530 (talk) 19:50, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Great Oaks Entertainment