lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Complementary sequences

message: As much as I am aware Golay complementary sequences have no connection to Golay codes. Golay complementary sequences are pairs of sequences of lenghtt 2, 4, 8, 10, 16, 26, 32, ... with some special autocorrelation properties. Golay codes are perfect error correting codes of length 23. The only thing they have in common is the name of the autor.
So I propose to remove the section "See also" containing Golay codes and related links. This is similar to putting links to the Complementary DNA sequences in the "See also" section just because the word complementary appears in both terms.
I propose to put a link to "Maximum length sequences" (or m-sequences or PN-sequences) instead. I intend to do that after writing a section comparing Golay complementary sequences to PN sequences.
Budisin srdjan 18:49, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The "see also" section of an article serves to list other topics that a reader might reasonably be interested in. Insofar as they are named after Golay, and concern sequences of binary digits, they seem related enough to be included in a see-also section. Adding complementary DNA sequences to the see-also list would be entirely appropriate, precisely because the phrase "complimentary sequence" appears in both of them.  By contrast, phrases that appear directly in the article should not be placed in the see-also section.  Thus, it would be wrong to put "maximum length sequence" in the see-also section.  linas 03:49, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

text: I've changed it to N-k-1.  For a shift of k, where k=0,...,N-1, the sum should contain N-k terms.  Since the lower limit of summation is 0, the upper limit should be N-k-1. Will Orrick (talk) 04:48, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
Talk:USS La Jolla

message: Should this page for this sub talk about the construction problems which led to the sacking of Admiral Rickover?
From the Rickover page:
Beyond any personal enmity or power struggles between the two naval leaders, it was Rickover's advanced age, singular focus and political clout regarding nuclear power, and strong, near-insubordinate stance against paying the fraudulently inflated submarine construction claims that gave Secretary Lehman substantial political capital to have Rickover retired. A moderate loss of ship control and subsequent depth excursion during the sea trials of the newly constructed USS La Jolla (SSN-701) – over which Rickover had direct supervisory control – provided Lehman with the final impetus for ending Rickover's career. Slowjoe17 (talk) 13:03, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rickover 

message: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ships#Bulk stripping of pennant numbers? Andy Dingley (talk) 12:52, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stripping pennant numbers
Talk:USS Baltimore (SSN-704)

message: Did this ship partake in any action during it's run?  Would love to read more... Dinkytown talk 17:45, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  History? 

message: Why the short life span? Anyone know? Others subs in this class are running for more than twice that time... -  theWOLFchild 18:20, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Only 16 years? 
Talk:Pope Valentine

message: Who is Louis-Marie DeCormenin, and how reliable is he? In a 1857 tome he says "...rumours declared that Valentine and Eugenius were involved in an illicit relationship. Forty-nine years later, Horace K. Mann says, "With the death of Eugenius, the Roman clergy, nobility and people all acclaimed Valentine as being the most worthy to occupy the Apostolic See." ---If someone rumored to be in an illicit relationship with the pope is acclaimed as the most worthy successor, what does that say about the other candidates? Mannanan51 (talk) 23:17, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Louis-Marie DeCormenin was a staunch critic of the Papacy and the Catholic Church. His work on the History of the Popes contains much that is critical of the individual popes, and relates many stories about individual popes that are salacious in nature. Whether the facts DeCormenin quotes are true or not, they are sourced from original sources, which he cites, and he is a useful counterpoint to the magisterial work of Horace K. Mann, who was a staunch Catholic, and whose work deliberately excluded such material. For an encyclopaedic article, it is appropriate to include material from both approaches, so long as such material is identified as such. Oatley2112 (talk) 07:12, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rumors
Talk:USS Hyman G. Rickover (SSN-709)

message: While not flattering, Rickover's own comment on the sub bearing his name should be added.  143.232.210.38 (talk) 01:15, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: What was it?WiseguyThreeOne (talk) 04:15, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: "It's not an aircraft carrier." --Rickover 198.123.52.220 (talk) 21:57, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Now that's funny. What the hell, Carl Vinson got one named after him.WiseguyThreeOne (talk) 02:16, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I realize this is an old thead, but gotta ask; is this legit and is there a source? - wolf 21:11, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Rickover Comment on Commissioning
Talk:Ruth Vincent

message: Are we sure this depicts Elsie? It doesn't look much like it to me, and the source site doesn't say what character Vincent is playing, though her name is mentioned apropos of a YoG revival. Tim riley (talk) 16:51, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The same photo (although cropped differently and brightened) is so identified in Wilson and Lloyd's Gilbert & Sullivan, the Official D'Oyly Carte Picture History, p. 73, 1984.  But I certainly see what you mean. Do you have an alternate theory?  I just looked at every photo of her on the G&S Archive, and none match, although curiously a very large number of her photo links there, especially postcard links (at least half a dozen) seem to have gone dead. -- Ssilvers (talk) 17:17, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Now I look at the volumes on my shelves there is a picture of Ilka Pálmay in a pretty much identical get up as Elsie in 1897 in Mander and Michenson's Picture History. One wonders what Percy Anderson was thinking of, but I think it's Elsie all right. Tim riley (talk) 17:28, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I suppose this would be the wedding dress in Act II finale?  -- Ssilvers (talk) 17:44, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture of Ruth Vincent as Elsie Maynard
Talk:Chrysler Town & Country (1941–1988)

message: Word is, the '41 T&C was the top-$ Mopar. Worth a mention?  Trekphiler 03:45, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Priceline.chrysler

message: Is there a source, that calls 1951-1959 cars the second generation?.. How can such different cars, as 1951 (which were essentially based upon 1949 design), 1955 (revolutionary Forward Look) and 1957 (Forward Look phase II) be regarded as one generation?.. By the way, the first generation was in fact two different models: 1941 (with its direct postwar incarnation) and 1949, with 4-in longer wheelbase and changed body style. The 1960 model would be therefore not the 3rd generation, but rather the 5th. Pibwl ←« 12:39, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Generations
Talk:USS Chicago (SSN-721)

message: On the article USS CHICAGO SSN 721 , IT IS STATED THAT THIS IS THE FOURTH (4th) SHIP WITH THAT NAME. THAT IS NOT RIGHT. THERE ARE FIVE (5) OF THEM:
*USS CHICAGO CA 14     DEC 5,1889 TO 8 AUG 1921 (SUNK)
*USS CHICAGO CA 29     APRIL 10,1930 TO 30 JAN 1943 (SUNK)
*USS CHICAGO CA 136    AUG 20,1944 TO 6 JUNE 1947 (RECLASSIFED NOV 1,1958
*USS CHICAGO CG 11     MAY 1,1964 TO JAN 31,1984
*USS CHICAGO SSN 721   OCT 13,1984    STILL SERVING THIS GREAT COUNTRY... 
THANK YOU      WILLIAM D. PADGETT RM3 SERVED ON THE MIGHTY "CHI TOWN" 1965-1968 ,ACTING "MASTER AT ARMS USS CHICAGO REUNION COMM" (70.179.147.216 (talk) 18:10, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: CA-136 and CG-11 are the same hull and considered the 3rd USS Chicago, so there have only been 4. See Chicago III, the US Navy's Dictionary of American Fighting ships, by the US Navy which discusses the 3rd USS Chicago CA 136 / CG 11. And also the CG 11 (ex-CA 136) page on the Naval Vessel Register.  --Dual Freq (talk) 23:06, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  USS CHICAGO SSN 721
Talk:Jackie Ormes

message: I'm currently working on this page to get it up to standards (and remove some content which appears to be copied from another site). --Kynn 04:23, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done now. How's it look? --Kynn 15:27, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

text: Reference: Black Women in America An Historical Encyclopedia Volumes 1 and 2, edited by Darlene Clark Hine Copyright 1993, Carlson Publishing Inc., Brooklyn, New York 
--Kynn 13:53, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Work in progress 

message: Moving this here. It seems to be copied from one of the pages cited, and thus isn't used directly. If I can find a copy, I will look it up:
: Reference: Black Women in America An Historical Encyclopedia Volumes 1 and 2, edited by Darlene Clark Hine Copyright 1993, Carlson Publishing Inc., Brooklyn, New York 
--Kynn 13:53, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference 

message: Sources vary on her year of birth and her date of death. :( --Kynn 15:26, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates of birth and death
Talk:Max Greevey

message: In s01e06, Logan refers to Greevey as "detective" even though he was already stated to be a sergeant. Is it ok to call a sergeant that or was this just a lapse in script? 68.61.251.72 (talk) 00:38, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Rank

message: Was Greevey's first name ever referred to as "Maxwell" on the show?  I can only recall him ever being called Max, and even if his name isn't just Max, it could be short for Maximillian. - Charity 03:55, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Maxwell?
Talk:USS Alexandria (SSN-757)

message: : Moved here for greater visibility and (hopefully) review and comments.
: Cheers, --Joe Sperrazza (talk) 18:17, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming, placement & format of list of Commanding Officers section 
Talk:USS Asheville (SSN-758)

message: If you have any information on the USS Asheville (SSN-758) please send it to me at subman758@aol.com.  I would really like to complete the list of COB's, and Find out the Missing  XO's Names.--Subman758 (talk) 05:16, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Remember what WP:OWN says. -MBK004 16:45, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: ''Seeking Information on USS Asheville''

message: I'm not Navy, I'm Air Force, but nevertheless, do you really think that publicly identifying your shipmates on something that can (and is) read globally by anybody is a good idea? If this were my unit my CO would have my hide for this. Just something to think about, fella.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.213.207.141 (talk) 23:25, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  OPSEC 

message: Much of the narrative in the history section of this article is of no historical value. I question whether future generations will be enriched by the knowledge that on a day in August 1999, the crew ate hamburgers, or that in April 2000, they went swimming. Thest things may be true and relevant, but constitute a level of detail appropriate only for letters to Mom, not for an encyclopedia entry.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.14.46.66 (talk) 17:32, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical value? 
Talk:USS Jefferson City

message: Russell Harris, 1992-1993 
Michael Flentje, 1993-1994 
J. Shelton, 1994-1994
Marty Smith, 1994-1997 
Sean Sullivan, 1997-1999 
Ronald Steed, 1999-2001 
Dean A. Richter, 2001-2004
Daryl Caudel, 2004-2006
John D. Zimmerman, 2006-2008  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Happigolucki (talk • contribs) 22:44, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Past Commanding Officers
Talk:José Antonio Yorba

message: This line was removed from the article:
:Jose Antonio's Great grand son was US Army General George Smith Patton Jr.
Though it is true that Benjamin Davis Wilson, grandfather of George Patton, married Yorba's daughter Ramona, it was from his second marriage to Margaret Hereford and their daughter Ruth's marriage to George Patton, Sr. that General Patton descends. See Benjamin Wilson's Legacy
--Magi Media 03:57, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:USS Springfield (SSN-761)

message: I am looking to talk to someone who may have served with my son on the USS Springfield 2006/2007.  His name was Steven A. Jones.  He passed away on 9/21/09, and I was hoping to connect with people he may have been friends with, or worked, or talked directly with him.  He was a quiet young man, and may not have been among the popular crowd, but he was a kind person, and may have become close friends with someone there, who may care and want to know he has passed. Please help me.
Betty  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.231.117.42 (talk) 18:17, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did you know my son? 
Talk:Meteorological Service of Canada

message: Why was this article moved to Meteorological Services of Canada? The branch is officially called the Meteorological Service of Canada, not Services. Look it up for yourself: 
--hfx_chris 03:58, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've moved it back to Meteorological Service of Canada. --hfx_chris 04:06, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name -- why the move? 
Talk:Pope Leo V

message: This article says that:
[Leo V] was deposed and murdered, presumably strangled by Christopher, who was in turn executed by Pope Sergius III (904–911) in 904.
but the article on Pope Sergius III says:
[Sergius's] nemeses, Pope Leo V (903) and Antipope Christopher, both died in 904, allegedly strangled in prison on the order of Sergius,[10] a claim that the Catholic Encyclopedia called "extremely doubtful."
-- 202.63.39.58 (talk) 00:07, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradicts other articles
Talk:Concrete Angel

message: This is a true story, as Martina HAS said so, herself. Martina's mother was abusive, so remember, this is her lifestory. 
Martina told everyone it was true on an inclusive interview with ET Canada, in 2007...
George K. Archibald (talk) 02:44, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The music video is here. Regarding the version in the current edit (15:39, 2011 October 28‎ 72.200.219.249). The video does not show the two alone together. That the boy is dead at the time of the funeral is certain; his cause of death is not given. My interpretation is the girl being unhappy in life is befriended by an angel who attends her funeral and continues to be her friend after her death. The fatal beating of the girl having had nothing to do with their relationship.1archie99 (talk) 13:55, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Clarifying and correcting my earlier edit- Since the boy was an angel and had no physical prescence the mother could not catch them alone together as the article edit states. When I stated that the boy and the girl were not shown together I was talking about the mother looking for a reason to beat the girl; there is per the video no reason and the boy sadly watches from the vacant house as the little girl suffers the fatal beating from the person who should be caring for her.1archie99 (talk) 16:59, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:   Music video 

message: This is also the title of a song from Gareth Emery and Christina Novelli (which does not have its own wiki page, but is discussed in both of their pages).  As it stands today, the Gareth Emery/Christina Novelli is being played constantly on multiple radio stations, even though it is a couple of years old.  While I don't propose giving their song a wiki page, would it be possible to have a disambiguation that points back to their pages?  When I was trying to get info on their song, search keep bringing me here, which was confusing since I hadn't even realized there was a prior song with this title. Potatman (talk) 23:08, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation needed?
Talk:USS Michigan (SSGN-727)

message: The first eight Ohio's, including Michigan, were equipped with Trident-I.  The first four, including Michigan, were converted to SSGN's.  The next four were converted to Trident-II.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:600:C880:34E0:7892:2D68:2AD0:F600 (talk) 18:55, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong missile
Talk:USS Florida (SSGN-728)

message: "In 1997, Florida's skipper, Commander Michael J. Alfonso, was relieved of command 'because he had been unable to foster an effective command team so necessary to the success of the U.S. submarine force.'"[4]
"Florida's command history for 1997 states:..."
There is no explanation of why the captain was relieved of command. Why cite an incident, if you're not going to explain it? 2604:2000:1580:415A:1920:48F:A553:49A1 (talk) 05:57, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Incident is cited, without clarification
Talk:USS Kentucky (SSBN-737)

message: I just restored the Commanding Officers section which I originally added.   This list was removed by a prior editor with a reason of "no reference provided".   The reference for this information is the Welcome Aboard pamphlet given to visitors.  Many other facts are on this page without specific reference noted either.  If there is some other reason for removal, let's discuss it on this page prior to making a blanket deletion.--64.126.51.212 (talk) 01:14, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I just realized I was not logged in when I made the comment above and the related edit.  I'll vouch the above comment and reference were made by me.--P Todd (talk) 01:16, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The removal was blanket because not every commanding officer is inherently notable and this is not a webpage just listing every single piece of information about the ship, for that the sub's officers can do that if they wish on their own bandwith. Also, I do not believe that a pamphlet provided can be properly cited in accordance with our policies. Accordingly until a proper citation can be provided that meets all of our policies I have removed the section. Please do not restore it until such criteria can be properly met. Please bring this up at WT:SHIPS if you disagree. -MBK004 03:57, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: True that every commander individually is not notable . . that is why each commander does not have their own wiki page.  To have their own wiki page, they would need to be notable.  I believe it is; however, notable who the commanders of a ship have been.   I will bring this up at WT:SHIPS.  The reason you deleted was because you did not believe I provided a reference that is in accordance to our (I'm one of the "our's" too) policy.  I provided such a reference.  I could provide you with a physical copy if you so desire.  Then you bring up a totally different reason, that of notability.  I will raise it in the other location and get a second opinion as to why these fine men should not be recognized.--P Todd (talk) 04:44, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commanding Officers Section 
Talk:Armenian Border Guard

message: The Armenian Border Guard is a part of the Armenian National Security Service and does not belong to the armed forces!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.255.44.182 (talk) 15:55, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Here the actual sleeve patch and symbol of the Armenian border guard service
[]
If you can read Armenian you will see that the border guard service is part of the Armenian national security service.
Vahram  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.142.243.1 (talk) 20:00, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Dimension (data warehouse)

message: I've tagged this with  because the present article is basically incomprehensible. Given a data set, what is an "item" in that data set? A variable? An observation? How does the example relate to the given definition?  --LambiamTalk 04:18, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Expert needed

message: It seems pointless to have the two articles separate, considering the small content of each. Data warehousing would seem to be a small subset of dimension table. 
Virtuald 06:15, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It does not make sense to put them together either. Not every dimension table is a dimension! Maybe in a (small) relational world it does.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.178.209.212 (talk) 11:28, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It is, in fact, the other way around: not every dimension gets implemented as a dimension table. (A degenerate dimension, for example.) Still, I'd agree with Virtuald: no sense in keeping the articles separate. GregorB (talk) 00:00, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Support, but the target article should be Dimension (data warehouse), covering both nicely. -DePiep (talk) 19:47, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

text: Support, I'm going to look into this shortly and do as DePiep suggest. Those two articles need to be merged because (a) it's an important subject, (b) there is a lot of literature available. Going to merge them into this article because these are both stubs but this article is a bit less stubby and more generic. RonaldKunenborg (talk) 21:33, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

text: Support, I agree with RonaldKunenborg
Ensslen (talk) 03:12, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

text: Disagree: Dimension table is by far the better article.  Items of value from this article (if any) should be merged into that. --66.161.59.254 (talk) 03:45, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

text: Support, I agree dimension and Dimension Table are not too different from each other to have different pages  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aman861 (talk • contribs) 09:07, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with [[dimension table]]
Talk:Pope Celestine IV

message: According to his article, Pope-elect Stephen is nowadays not consered a legitimate pope, since he died before his coronation. According to this article, Celestine IV also died before his coronation, so why is he considered legitimate when Stephen is not? /Ludde23 Talk Contrib 14:29, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The law concerning the papal elections has been changed in the meantime. When Stephen was elected it was neccessary to receive episcopal consecration to assume the papal office. After the Decree In Nomine Domini of Pope Nicholas II (1059) the elect could have exercised papal office immadiately after his election, no matter whether already bishop or not. Besides, it is neccessary to distinguish the rites of episcopal consecration and of coronation. Celestine IV received episcopal consecration in 1238, three years before his election to the papacy, because in this year he became bishop of Sabina. He died before coronation, but not before episcopal consecration. Stephen was not a bishop when elected pope. CarlosPn (talk) 18:07, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why does he count? 

message: I fixed the reference to "Matteo Orsini" to correctly point to the Senator who was alive at the time and heavily involved in the conclave that elected Pope Celestine IV.  However, I can find no reference to his excommunication by Celestine anywhere on the net.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.0.5.72 (talk) 14:47, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Excommunication of Orsini? 

message: By and large I really liked reading this article, but it doesn't seem like a Wikipedia article about pope celestine iv, more like an article about the issues surrounding his coronation and the papal spat with Frederick II. I would rewrite it, but I know nothing about the subject except what I have learned here. 49.197.228.50 (talk) 01:06, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Very informative, but confusing  

message: A bit suspicious I'd say. A lot of poisonings going on in this time. 24.190.10.91 (talk) 13:55, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cause of death fatigue and old age at 61?