Template talk:NASDAQ

message: I don't know about that space after the colon. It looks better without it, just like "p.l.c." isn't "p. l. c.", "A.G." isn't "A. G.", and S.A. isn't "S. A.". - Jerryseinfeld 03:34, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Space

message: I suggest that we do not include parentheses here, in order to better combine with similar templates. For example:  (NASDAQ: MLEA, TYO: 8766) Shawnc 15:44, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Parentheses

message: See Template talk:Nyse#Reason for bold?. -- Centrx 18:20, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bold should not be used 

message: I do not think this should be put right after the company name. Wikipedia is not a stock trade website. Providing a link to Nasdaq is not that important. Put it in the infobox instead. --Apoc2400 (talk) 20:50, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Which infobox? I don't see an infobox at Shutterfly. --68.0.124.33 (talk) 11:14, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stop inserting in the beginning of articles 

message: Please, add interwiki :ru:Шаблон:NASDAQ. -- AVBtalk 22:47, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done, thanks. --Amalthea 00:11, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

text: * Thanks. -- AVBtalk 19:41, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  interwiki 

message: This template is adding non-article pages into :Category:Companies listed on NASDAQ - please add a  template to prevent this, as I have done in other similar templates, for example Template:Lse). snigbrook (talk) 19:36, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:43, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template adding non-article pages into article category 

message: NASDAQ.com is using a new link format for quotes pages.  The old format still redirects ok, but it's probably a good idea to use the current format in this template (symbol in lower case):  Example: http://www.nasdaq.com/symbol/aapl
Jim nasdaq (talk) 23:02, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. The template should not auto-cat, per WP:CAT, let alone the added complexity of having to chose the template. Rich Farmbrough, 00:41, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: About 10% of the articles had the explicit cat, the rest I am adding now. Rich Farmbrough, 19:08, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: And many were already incorrectly categorized by use of this template in navboxes. Rich Farmbrough, 20:40, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  New link format 

message: I followed a link from this template today and the target site http://www.nasdaq.com/symbol/xxxx denied me access unless I disabled my ad blocker. A large fraction of Internet users today are using ad blockers routinely and our readers should not be unduly inconvenienced when following our standard links to stock information from company articles. There are many publicly available sites offering the same information without hindrance, so I suggest that Wikipedia point this template elsewhere, for example https://www.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ%3AXXXX. Any comments? — JFG talk 14:47, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  NASDAQ site unreadable with ad blockers 

message: I propose a version of this template that allows multiple symbols so we don't have to use  anymore. This has been done with the TSX's template () already. Thus, Liberty Media's lengthy Nasdaq syntax would be simplified to  from , , , , , , and . Omegatiger121 (talk) 23:46, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multiple Symbols, like the TSX's tmeplate 

message: please change ((NASDAQ)) to ((Nasdaq)) 2601:541:4580:8500:516A:C7C6:4CF6:3533 (talk) 22:32, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Done  per Talk:Nasdaq#Requested move 27 January 2021. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:14, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  NASDAQ 

message: You are invited to join the discussion at WP:ELN § Templates being used to embed external links into articles. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:42, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion at [[:WP:ELN#Templates being used to embed external links into articles|WP:ELN §&nbsp;Templates being used to embed external links into articles]]