lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Albert Czech Republic

message: I am  THOMAS FITZPATRICK  - British subject   working in Prague for unicridit bank (contract finishes in April 2016.) 
 
Details of the incident – AT PANRAC Shopping center   Albert Hypermarket.
 
On Sunday 13th December at about 1pm I was walking fron the checkout after buying and paying for two pair of socks.
 
I was forcibly stopped by two men who said something in Czeck and then in English -- ”you are in trouble you must open your bag someone has senn you put sports equipment in your bag.”
 
I said that I would not open my bag and they took it of me and opened it . They searched it and found nothing.
 
I asked to see the manager but they said no I could not dio that.
 
I walked to the manager’s office and one of them pushed me back.
 
They all said they could not speak English and just laughed at me. 
 
There were many people watching.
 
I went to the information desk in the shopping centre and they gave me a form to fill in which I did and they sent a copy to the hypermarket manager and gave me a copy.
 
Then I went back to the hypermarket manager and he gave me a letter in CZECK which said that I has been falsely accused of sdhoplifting.
 
I gave a copy of this letter to  the Information desk and kept the original for myself.  
 
 
Thomas Fitzpatrick
Room 302, Attic Hotel Prague 4.
 
IT Consultant at Unicredit Bank  Filadelfie building Prague 4
 
Note  The email address that I am sending this from is my official Unicredit one.
I am on the 3rd floor, section C.
 
This is the reply I received for this email from AlBERT HQ in Prague.
 
Dear Mr. Fitzpatrick,
we understand your point of view, however we do not take the responsibility for the behaviour of the employees from the tenants in a shopping mall Arkády Pankrác.
As far as I have the information from the supermarket, the Store Manager is apologising for the personal once more, which is obviously written in a letter in czech language.
Thank you for your understanding.
We wish you a very Merry Christmas.
S pozdravem / Best regards
Renata Fikerová
Center Management/Marketing
 
Arkády Pankrác  
Management centra 
Na Pankráci 86 
CZ 140 00 Praha 4 
 
ECE Projektmanagement Praha s.r.o. 
Na Příkopě 859/22, 110 00 Praha 1 
Phone: +420 225 111 114
Fax: +420 225 111 130 
 
www.arkady-pankrac.cz 
www.ece.com 
Not taken responsiblity for their own employees actions.
This from a major international supermarket chain - unbeleivable
but one hundred percent true. I have all the document to prove it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.122.80.40 (talk) 11:10, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:AIC Limited

message: The logo in the article does not seem to apply to this company. I left it in place in case I'm wrong, or it's a joke or a clever piece of vandalism. Lou Sander (talk) 02:56, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong logo 
Talk:Air conditioned clothing

message: The article appears to be mixing units of power and energy to an extent that it is not possible to tell whether Air conditioned clothing actually saves energy (using 4000 watts is using 4000 watts (as it runs), using 4000 watt-hours over am 8 hour period is an average of 500 watts). My guess is that the power used is a lot less than 4000 watts, that's a lot of heat to get rid of!  -98.175.217.74 (talk) 17:13, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Airlines for America

message: The removal of any material from this section must be discussed out first. This article is not an ad for A4A. Insidentally they have an account and are working this article. I refuse to allow them to capture their own article, or sign buddies up to do it for them. --100.44.104.5 (talk) 00:50, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Continual Removal of Criticisms Section

message: Given that the Air Transport Association’s stub-class article only contains very basic information, ATA would like to expand the content.  In the interest of ensuring the page's neutrality, we would like to know if any other editors would like to work with us to update this article.  If there is no interest, we will work to ensure that our revisions fall in line with Wikipedia's standards of neutrality, no original research and verifiability.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lanekedc3 (talk • contribs) 21:45, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In the vein of full disclosure and transparency, it is important that a criticisms section is a part of this article. I've taken the advise of previous editors and modified that which was pending and added it back to the article in NPOV fashion. --67.53.166.50 (talk) 17:21, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Criticizms section added

message: Updated broken links to correctly go to the ATA website and removed paragraph on seasonal forecasts because the information is no longer accurate. --Lanekedc3 (talk) 15:11, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outdated content 

message: A link should be provided to ATA chapter numbers?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.99.95.34 (talk) 09:55, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[ATA chapter numbers]] 
Talk:Spirou et Fantasio (comic book)

message: I reverted the recent move as I think WP:NCC#Disambiguation between media types states the opposite of the action. This article is not what you'd expect to find at Spirou et Fantasio (comics), and refers to one obscure publication, properly media disambiguated with the present name. MURGH disc. 18:19, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Page move

message: I believe this album has been reprinted by now, albeit only in a limited edition. 惑乱 Wakuran (talk) 19:46, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: "Republished"
Talk:ATPCO

message: i want to know more about ATPCO. what i believe the information given in the article is not enough. please eleborate more things.
Regards
Jaswinder Kaur
No mention of United States v. Airline Tariff Publishing Company???  It is mentioned very briefly in United States antitrust law but there is no discussion of it there either.
Frank MacCrory (talk) 04:00, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Please change the title from "Airline Tariff Publishing Company" to "ATPCO" as it's better know in the airline and travel industry.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by RSpolter (talk • contribs) 20:11, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request edit
Talk:Aladdin Industries

message: I reorganized the article this date, having found it a jumble of out-of-sequence half-truths.  I also changed the description from Aladdin being a "manufacturer" to to the vaguer term "vendor", as it is not clear from the Aladdin-PMI Web site, whether they manufacture anything anymore.  The link to their company history page, accessible from the site map, links back to the site map; they seem to be cagey about saying anything regarding their manufacturing operations or source of products sold under the Aladdin name.  My guess is that they've shut down most, if not all, U.S.-based manufacturing and are now simply importers of Aladdin-branded junk made in China.  Short of performing original research and calling Aladdin-PMI directly for information, that's all I can do for now. —QuicksilverT @ 17:18, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  History and product line 

message: The article Aladdin (food & beverage containers) ought to be merged into this article. The two articles are clearly about the same subject. -- John Broughton   (♫♫) 23:02, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree that should be merged, but argue for the reverse direction because the brand continues, while the company has folded (15 years ago). Given that the proposal is rather old, I've done this boldly. Klbrain (talk) 08:58, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 
Talk:Alenia Aeronautica

message: I've removed the redlinked hatnotes per WP:HAT#Non-existent articles: 
:Hatnotes should not be used for articles that do not exist since the notes are intended to point the user to another article they may have intended to find. The exception is if one intends to create the linked article immediately. In that case, consider creating the new article first, before saving the addition of the hatnote.
I don't see why hatnotes to the actual butterfly articles could not be used, since the genus is usually included in the scientific names. However, as I do not understand the specifics of Nomenclature Codes, I did not try to write a hatnote myself, lest I incure the rath of the "experts". 
Condescending and antagonistic notes/summaries such as "If you do not understand what "codes of nomenclature" are, do not even *think* about removing the redlinks, OK?" are not very conducive to cooperative editng. Futher such notes will be treated as uncivil. and reported in the apporpriate place. Thanks. - BilCat (talk) 22:43, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Hatnotes

message: I just removed a large section, which was mostly taken from the Alena homepage (i.e.). Furthermore the removed text was unbearable marketing bladder-dash. --noclador (talk) 06:29, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violation and Marketing speak
Talk:Alkermes plc

message: Having checked this article, most of it seems to be taken from press releases, which is a copyright problem. There are also a fair few versions of close paraphrasing. I've removed what I can, but what's left may need to be rewritten as well. The Cavalry (Message me) 23:33, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry for the delay. I will revise this article per your comments ASAP.Michael Leeman (talk) 19:34, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problems 
Talk:Prostitution in Hong Kong

message: I find the source for the following UNRELIABLE, but for the sake of free-encyclopedia, I mention it here anyway. Perhaps some experienced lawyers can find RELIABLE source. Tony85poon (talk) 08:54, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree about zonaeuropa.com being unreliable sources. The article links to three other sources. That said, I don't think the source backs up the text in the article "The laws of Hong Kong currently allow classified ads for prostitution and websites that allow clients to make appointments with prostitutes." The defendants were found guilty in this case so this does not point to the ads being legal. There was also further action against Sex141 in 2013. --John B123 (talk) 16:20, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Appointments
Talk:Vachel Lindsay/to do

message: Hi... I am not sure this is the right page to respond, but I wrote the original Vachel Lindsay article.  I have material to back up comments... but honestly this is the first time that I have written something that has been critiqued in this way... so I would welcome some guidance of what you are actually suggesting that we add here.  Much has been written on Lindsay; it just struck me as amazing that nobody had written on him here.  Regarding the quotation of the poems, I can give the citations.  Regarding the racism allegations, I tried to hit a balance between those critics who have lambasted Lindsay for racism with those who, like me, feel he was fairly enlightened for his time and was a fine poet. If I erred here, help me in cleaning this up.
As a professor, I tried to tone down the scholarly aspect of my usual writing... that said, if I toned it down so much that this has become unacceptable as material, I would be happy to modify it.  I simply need some direction that is a bit clearer than "Every single part of it qualifies as original research"... In short, what DOES qualify as reliable source material... I can provide this to whatever extent and in whichever format the wiki editors suggest.
David A. Victor 14:34, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I am not saying its OR, it just appears that way because the source information is too ambiguous. Add some inline citations and that will go a long way toward fixing the problem I think. I know what I put up is kind of vague I will try to do a more thorough review later today or tonight. : ) See Wikipedia:Reliable sources too. I am sure you have reliable souces to back up everything in that section and like I said I didn't mean that it was original research but as is now it would qualify just because of the amibibuity of the sources. That's all. See Springfield, Illinois to check out the clean up there. This isn't a bad article just one that needs to be documented better.A mcmurray 17:24, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Bharatpur Airport

message: hello, there .dear sir i would like to know about the finance payment system. what is the total cost and the way of payment.the intake method and session too. I would be patiently waiting your replay.Thanking you.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dipesh Tamang (talk • contribs) 04:22, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  financial system 
Talk:Sol Garfunkel

message: Does anyone know what Sol Garfunkel is doing now? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 61.38.192.57 (talk) 01:51, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What Garfunkel is doing now 
Talk:Jiří Tibor Novak

message: WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 01:05, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: Books published by Oxford Univ Press and Macmillan ... seems pretty mainstream stuff.  I am just starting the research and filling in the bibliography.  Stumps 01:54, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: 991 Ghits, sounds potentially notable to me. DWaterson 23:56, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Argument against deletion
Talk:Gokak agitation

message: Hi, can anyone add additional info about the movement from here: https://www.deccanherald.com/special-features/karnatakas-defining-moments-the-gokak-movement-and-kannada-pride-919589.html, a reliable source. Master Sam 77 (talk) 12:29, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition of info
Talk:Ted Fest

message: Why the paddy power links on this article?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.152.97.151 (talk) 20:40, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

message: ...yet it still seems to be taking place annually. Equinox ◑ 20:24, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  No details for years since 2011?!
Talk:Ford Fox platform

message: Does anyone know where the name (Fox) was derived from?
Pretty simple, the body style changes are designated by the following 
1965-1966 A or ALPHA body
1967-1968 B or BRAVO body
1969-1970 C or CHARLIE body
1971-1973 D or DELTA body
1974-1978 E or ECHO body
1979-1992 F or FOX body
This Fox platform article is someone's a dreamed up crap.. do a little research on Ford and Mustangs before posting.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.252.241.34 (talk) 01:30, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

message: "The Fox Mustang is one of the most popular Ford platform vehicle still on the road today."
I don't think this is true anymore, I very rarely see a fox on the road that isn't mine.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dragon574444 (talk • contribs) 04:09, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Asserted popularity

message: Glad someone corrected the page to list model years instead of "production" and also labeled the heading correctly. Readers should not be guessing why a timeline is one year short of when actually introduced. Some editors are lost on the differences between a production run (1978-2004) and that of model year timeline (1979-2004). If I could buy a Fox Mustang for Christmas in 1978 and drive it home before New Year's 1979, that car definitely didn't come out in 1979 nor did Ford start building, marketing, and selling them in 1979. It's simply just the model year designation, because the official 1979 model year ran from October 1978 to September 1979. MYs are essentially a selling season. Pretending otherwise is obtuse. Therefore, I suggest ALL automotive articles make this distinction or anything listed "production...", will be correctly reflected as the actual production period.I couldn't care less about how someone "feels" about that, unless they correctly list such info under MY, model year(s) like recently done on the main page. Americans are not the only readers of Wikipedia, so everything must be harmonized, so that European, African, or Asian readers, will know correctly that Mercedes-Benz introduced the 300E in 1985 to US (same year as Europe) in spite of its 1986 model year designation. Or that the S550 Mustang was already available from August 2014 to USA, unlike 2015 in export markets, 2016 in some. I've made my point, as I support the recent changes to the main page.--Carmaker1 (talk) 22:59, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timelines
Talk:Ensamble Gurrufío

message: Whoever (User:NIu) nominated this article for deletion is basing such proposition on just an assumption, not on actual experience. I quote: "Doesn't seem to be sufficiently notable". In contrast, I have watched Gurrufío in actual performance, several times. I wrote the initial article (which is still incomplete) on the basis of the extraordinary brilliance and quality of the ensemble in question (and I've been to concerts worldwide, I assure you), and as a musician I know what I'm talking about. But don't believe me. Ask a professional, a celebrated musician, such as Leo Brouwer, or Carlos Barbosa-Lima, or Alirio Díaz, what do they think of the Ensamble Gurrufío. You would be surprised. I don't see the point in the reasoning about "their releases were independent releases": So what? Moreover, I hope to have news soon, as I am in contact with the group, and plan to add a wealth of additional information, and will ask their permission to upload sound clippings to Wikimedia Commons. After having listened to them, I guess some minds will think twice about this article's deletion. The same goes for the article on Cheo Hurtado.  Regards, --AVM 02:03, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article has been nominated for DELETION (!!!???)
Talk:Thomas Cup

message: There are some extremely bad usage of grammar in this article. Is it alright if I make some edits?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.131.209.102 (talk • contribs) 
:Be BOLD and do it - no permission required. Awyong J. M. Salleh 02:10, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Most of the grammatical errors should have been corrected at this point (March 19, 2008). Badmintonhist (talk) 06:04, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammar 

message: You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:In the news § Remove ITN/R: Sports cleanup.  Currently this event is listed at Wikipedia:In the news/Recurring items, meaning that it has been judged significant enough that, if nominated, it will always be posted to the In the news section of the main page (subject to article quality being sufficient). However as it has not been nominated recently as proposal has been made to remove it from that list. If the proposal is successful, the event may still be nominated but the nomination will debate the significance of the event as well as article quality. To avoid splitting discussion, please leave your comments in at the linked discussion rather than here. Thryduulf (talk) 20:41, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposal related to featuring this event at Wikipedia:In the news
Talk:Dysarthria

message: Please do not copy and paste from http://www.d.umn.edu/~mmizuko/2230/msd.htm. See WP:COPYRIGHT ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 05:37, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  do  not copy and paste 

message: --The  wikifyer's corner 18:42, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy-edit 

message: Any reason why this unregistered editor can't edit the article?  I can't see any "padlock" symbol. All I wanted to do was to replace a dead external link with one from the UK NHS.--217.155.32.221 (talk) 11:40, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Locked article? 

message: Neuroprosthesis for Decoding Speech in a Paralyzed Person with Anarthria Mapsax (talk) 23:25, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Of note 

message: :: Dys- (difficult) +‎ arthr(o)- (vocal articulation) +‎ -ia (condition). -- 92.10.212.58 (talk) 15:51, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology 

message: Monkey clim on the tree 2405:EC01:1002:BFB1:1:0:E72A:BC5C (talk) 14:22, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Monkey
Talk:List of gnostic terms

message: I think the article is useful.  There are many many articles on wikipedia which refer to gnosticism, gnostics or gnostic topics.  The gnostic article itself already has a fairly large vocabulary section and that isn't going to be nearly enough.  A simple lookup table seems to me to be useful.  I can't see any real harm in it and there is considerable need.  Wikipedia is not adverse to useful lists.  You claim about glossary is not part of wp:not.  I see no reason for deletion.  jbolden1517Talk 02:13, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it is covered Wp:not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_dictionary. Specificly mentions lists, limiting them to disambiguations of words with multiple meanings and multiple articles. Frankly, they should go in the section on Gnosticism. The ones which have main articles are too long and should be shortened, as there is no need to duplicate the information. That would shorten the article and allow the inclusion of additional terms. IPSOS (talk) 02:21, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I have no problem with a merger if there is broad support.  jbolden1517Talk 02:55, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

text:  Well its been a while.  The "wikipedia is not a glossary" isn't policy.  Articles like list of poker terms, List of baseball jargon show this this was not atypical and both have gone to AFD.  I'm removing the merger discussion.   jbolden1517Talk 13:19, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion / merger
Talk:Acca Larentia

message: I think they're really ugly, and should be replaced with something else.  I just can't think of what right now.  I do however think it important that the three divergent traditions regarding her mythology should be separated in some way by headers, or by something.  Any ideas?  Ford MF 08:23, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. No ideas; just rewrote subheads. Hope they're OK. Cynwolfe (talk) 00:17, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: "Mythological history" headers
Talk:The Wichita Train Whistle Sings

message: I find Nesmith's explanation of the album being a tax write off very suspicious. It seems an unlikely item to be a valid claim ("I decided to make a recored album instead of paying you any tax...!"), but extremely likely to be something he'd pay for out of his own pocket, with or without his accountant's blessing. His agenda seemed to run 1. join The Monkees, 2. take over The Monkees, 3. start solo career while still a Monkee, 4. leave The Monkees. Since Hal Blaine was interested enough to ask why he was spending so much cash, I can see Mike being reluctant to confess this was his escape plan. MartinSFSA (talk) 11:38, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tax write off or career move? 

message: "which makes the sound harsh and over-bright." Many people prefer the sound of vinyl. Would the writer describe the sound of the vinyl in the same terms? If not, then why would a vinyl-to-CD transfer sound worse than the vinyl itself? Kanderso (talk) 13:35, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sound of the CD