Talk:Cypriot Second Division

message: The information on the page is not from reliable sources and there doesn't to be a list anywhere on the net. I need help finding all the winners.
Anarxia 21:23, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Winners

message: The league was played in two groups until sometime in the 50s. The page needs a format section that describes the previous formats.
Anarxia 21:23, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Format

message: The image :Image:Cfa.gif is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here.  In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.  Please check
:* That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
:* That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --08:00, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image copyright problem with Image:Cfa.gif

message: The 1966-67 season itself does not appear to be notable. This content should be developed at the parent article, Cypriot Second Division and then spun out. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:29, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[1966–67 Cypriot Second Division]] 

message: The 1967-68 season does not appear to be notable itself. This content should be developed at the parent article, Cypriot Second Division, and then spun out. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:33, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  You're hardly an objective editor. You're a Cypriot, a football fan, and you've created a number of these articles, too. From the look of it you've never edited outside this subject. Please read WP:NSEASONS. Bottom line, please be aware that those of us at WP:NPP are going to find these unsatisfactory articles. You should be concerned that an outside editor does not approve. Chris Troutman (talk) 01:34, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  I am always concerned about wikipedia policies and rules Chris, but obviously i can't be aware of everyone of them. I have to admit that i didn't knew that many individual seasons could be merged all in a single article, as i didn't involved in any similar (merging) case in the past. In all cases i was involved, when an article was considered as not notable, it was proposed directly for deletion. I have only two quick questions to ask, if you can help me: (1) That two seasons articles (1966–67 & 1967–68) are not considered notable because they lack sources or information, or just because they are "second division" articles? I mean they need improvement, or will not be notable whatever changes to be made? For example, this season's article 2014–15 Cypriot Second Division, which includes more information and sources is notable? (2)That question is just for encyclopedic purposes: In WP:NSEASONS, says that "multiple seasons may be grouped together in a single article". That means a new (specific) article will be created and will include all seasons in it (and a link to this article will be included in the parent article), or all these seasons' information will be added directly (inside) to the parent article? Can you provide me a link to a similar case article (which already was merged), just to see how the new articles are look like in these cases? Thanks in advance. Marios26 (talk) 05:50, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  To answer your first question, almost any subject found on Wikipedia should pass WP:GNG. For the subjects that don't we can presume notability based on Subject-specific Notability Guidelines (SNG) like WP:NATHLETE. When the subject doesn't pass an SNG  and doesn't have the sources to pass GNG, it's not notable at all and ought to be deleted. Merging the content is way to consolidate under a few sources until it can be better developed per WP:SPINOUT. I don't follow sports so I took a look around at other articles in order to answer your second question. I found plenty of examples like 2004–05 Isle of Man League of similar practices so these articles are exactly in keeping with the norm of WP:WikiProject Football. It doesn't surprise me articles written ostensibly by fans are dominated by cruft. I can't show you a better example. I guess I need to take my complaint up with the WikiProject. Chris Troutman (talk) 04:38, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

text: Perhaps you should re-read what I already wrote. Chris Troutman (talk) 15:43, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[1967–68 Cypriot Second Division]]