lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hissing Fauna, Are You the Destroyer?

message: It should be mentioned that this album has been fully leaked online. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.96.187.254 (talk) 16 November, 2006
Was this before or after the full album was made available here 
Khromatikos 04:54, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: surely there should be some mention about kevin barnes' separation from his wife, which seems a much more obviously underlying motif than the crazy georgie fruit thing.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.45.53.11 (talk) 13:43, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  album concept
Talk:The Huntingtons

message: So is it The Hungtingtons or Huntingtons? If it's the latter, the page will need moving. Also we shouldn't use all caps for the name. Changed. exolon 01:13, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This band sounds alot like the ramones. they were kinda like a Christian version of the ramones. Should we add that in? It would also help alot of Christian ramone fans who are searching for Christian music that is also of there kind. I was too one of those, then my friend told me about this band so I bought one of there cd's, and now i can't stop listening to them. I bought like all there songs on iTunes and everything. I feel it would help alot of Christian punks out there. What do you guyz think? --Mr. Comedian (talk) 23:07, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Ramones
Talk:Make Way for Noddy

message: The articles Gobbo (character) and Sly (goblin character) seem like unnecessary separate articles. -- NYArtsnWords 20:42, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe these goblin characters pre-date the Make Way For Noddy series - they first appeared in revised editions of Enid Blyton's Noddy books in the 1980s (replacing at least one golliwog character from the original, non-politically-correct editions). These articles should therefore be merged with Noddy, if anything. 217.155.20.163 23:03, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: The character descriptions were almost verbatim copies of the character descriptions from the Noddy website...copyright violation which could have gotten the whole article nixed. I've fixed it as best I can, and tried to include info about the characters' relevant traits. I've also cleaned up a whole mess of proofreading issues. This article could use more internal Wikilinks--I'll try to work on that next time, but if anyone else gets a chance, another pair of eyes would be great. Gladys j cortez (talk) 03:08, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Characters 

message: I'm not gonna lie, I'm honestly baffled to why this series never spawned a Blu-ray release. I'd absolutely love to see it in its highest quality yet. 2A02:8011:D017:91D:E4D9:9976:79D6:4524 (talk) 15:41, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  How come this was never released on Blu-ray?
Talk:Aaron Cassidy

message: The article is a copy and paste from this web page with a couple of words changed. It is substantially the same.  Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim  01:23, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

message: Much better, thanks.  Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim  01:31, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  wow 

message: This article is in desperate needs of fleshing out - Aaron Cassidy needs at least some biographical information and references as well. I broke the article up into sections and subsections, if that helps any. --Ozgod 05:50, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: February 20, 2007
Talk:Bill Ivy

message: Hello,
Quote:
"Ivy was touring back to the paddock with his helmet resting on the tank...:"
My comment:
Could you please name the source you took this statement from??
I'm sorry, but this "information" is "complete nonsense"!
Bill was far away from the pits, he even just passed the pits (approx. 
two kilometers away from the place where he crashed).
Absolutely no reason to take off the helmet there in the middle of the practise session!
By the way, unfortunately I don't have the time to visit the place of his crash today,
the 40th anniversary of his death. Exactly one year ago I was there.
30 years ago I proposed to establish a little memorial plate there, but under the
communistic "circumstances" there was no chance for it then.
Regards
Karl  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.210.49.86 (talk) 10:26, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Makin' It (song)

message: I thought that this song merited its own page because of its unique position as a theme song that lasted twice as long in the top 40 as the show lasted on the air.  There's not much information out there, so I'm going to do some research to get more information.  I'll add it when I have it, and include the appropriate references. Brad E. Williams 01:33, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Detroit Rock City.
Lafay 00:30, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I added that, as well as Cold Case and Fame. Brad E. Williams 13:23, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Also featured in...
Talk:Deinstitutionalization

message: There is another page with similar content, under the title "Deinstitutionalisation."
It probably would be appropriate to merge the two, and have some way for those searching for the alternative spelling to arrive at the correct destination. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jyaroch (talk • contribs) 
:Merged per suggestion. Jokestress 02:28, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page is similar to "Deinstitutionalisation" 
Talk:Pennsylvania Route 291

message: I find 'becoming a physically divided highway that was built in the 1970s".
Huh?  I am originally from Wilmington, Delaware, and remember Industrial Highway as the route from Chester to Philadelphia before I-95 was built in that area, and Industrial Highway goes back further than the 1970s.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.63.16.82 (talk) 21:23, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: When was this section built?
Talk:Everglades High School

message: Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim  01:38, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

message: lol LightSpeed1 23:03, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hey Everglades 

message: I believe there is more to add for both of these sections. LightSpeed3 06:07, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  I added a timeline and feats
Talk:The Toolbox Murders

message: This article is missing information on the film's production and should have some more reviews added to the reception section.--Paleface Jack (talk) 17:45, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article needs to be Expanded 

message: This article is missing a bunch of information on the film including information on the film's production, reception and legacy. As far as exploitation films are concerned this film is pretty significant and is mentioned in tons of books which also chronicle the film's production and other information, the most significant being the critically acclaimed NIGHTMARE USA: The Untold Story of the Exploitation Independents which also chronicles the film's production and release. There should also be more information on the film's legacy and its influence in exploitation cinema. I currently don't have any time right now to work on this page due to other commitments and projects, but if anyone is willing to do this and expand this article it would be much appreciated.--Paleface Jack (talk) 22:06, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion and significance 

message: There is no mention in this article on the film's controversy and only has an uncited mention of its role as a video nasty.--Paleface Jack (talk) 15:50, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy
Talk:Topusko

message: It is not possible that he visited Topusko in 1818, as he was born in 1830. Moreover he has never been Tsar.   His full title (or better: one of its incarnations) can be found on the linked page so I removed it here. -- WolfgangFaber 01:46, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Francis Joseph I
Talk:Loggernaut

message: Note to admin: there has already been signifigant support for a Merge, in a recent AFD discussion and no opinions have been voiced for no merge at the time of this writing, and, on that note, I voice my Support of a merge here due to brevity. i kan reed 01:48, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: First of all, as a rule of thumb, if it does not have an "author" and a "published date", then it's not a WP:RS ... an anonymous press announcement listing the speakers and the date of a reading does not qualify.
Second, the criteria to be used with this particular article is WP:Notability (web), not WP:Notability (organizations and companies).
Having said that, and having waded through the references provided, what I found was either trivial coverage (announcements), or coverage of the parent organization, i.e., the reading series with which it is affiliated, not the website itself.
What this article needs by way of Attribution is references to published articles that say, "This website is ...", and not just an interview conducted by email with one of the three authors featured at one bi-monthly reading that does not even mention the website ... the Willamette Week article may be WP:RS, but if you search it for "web", you get bupkiss, so it just does not count towards satisfying the "multiple, non-trivial" criteria of WP:WEB ... if this were instead an article about the Loggernaut Reading Series, then that would be a different story altogether (although it is still trivial coverage.) 
I'm sorry (sympathizing, not apologizing), but this looks like a candidate for CSD A7 speedy deletion, i.e., "Unremarkable people, groups, companies and websites." — 23:15, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability ... ''NOT!''
Talk:Frank E. Bauer Bridge

message: Is this the same thing as the Harlem Avenue Toll Bridge over in Category talk:Toll bridges in Illinois? I want to know if I can disambiguate it into this article.  Thanks! Gws57 01:52, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Harlem Avenue Toll Bridge" 
Talk:Acritarch

message: Where does the 2000-400 Ma range come from, acritarchs are present before, and after that time.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.238.140.203 (talk) 12:41, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Changed the end date to the present, from this ref , amongst lots of others. Mikenorton (talk) 15:18, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Now I've changed the start date to ~2500 Ma from this ref . Mikenorton (talk) 15:23, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

text:  If the end date is the present, the text should mention who they are now. Albmont (talk) 20:21, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Age range

message: that is the Mesoarchean - is that true? -- Hartmann Schedel II (talk) 20:46, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: If you refer to , no, that is definitely much later. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 06:44, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  3.200 million years 

message: Algabase has listings of Acritarch. There are a list of genera with family incertae sedis and also family Ooidiaceae with three genera This might be useful to update the article.
 —  Jts1882 | talk  09:31, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: It appears that our list comes from Fossilid.info. Can you tell if AlgaeBase has a different list? Also just because of family incertae sedis, does not mean it is an Acritarch. A similar classification may happen with environmental DNA, or low quality preservation. Actually it is Family: Acritarcha familia incertae sedis. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:48, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text:  Algaebase has a lot of genera that aren't in the Wikipedia article. The current Fossilid.info also has quite a few genera not in the article list, presumably due to updates. The article contains about 7 genera not in Fossilid.info, which might be because they have been removed from Fossilid or because editors have added to the list without proper sourcing (this happens too often). —  Jts1882 | talk  10:34, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Algaebase as potential source
Talk:John Marshal (died 1165)

message: Not sure how to deal with John's son, John.  It would be a lot easier if they had different names, but I'm pretty sure we don't need separate pages for them.  I wish I had a copy of Duby handy... Lordjim13 02:04, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: the infobox for the Lord Marshal says the incumbent held the position until 1199; neither John Marshal mentioned lives that long; any way to clear up the discrepancy by checking primary or secondary sources? --FeanorStar7 16:27, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox problem

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved to John Marshal (died 1165) (non-admin closure). Both in agreement that a new title is needed and Necrothesp has made a good argument that the original proposed title is ambiguous.  Jenks24 (talk) 10:27, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: John FitzGilbert, Marshal of the horses →  – Seems to be most often known via sources under this name.  A more succinct disambiguator seems to be necessary as well. Utopes (talk / cont) 00:59, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 8 October 2023
Talk:English Longhorn

message: The text says the animals are brown and white but the photo shows gray animals. Halfelven 20:03, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Color? 

message: There are several different breeds of Longhorns, such as the English Longhorn, Spanish Longhorn (which Columbus brought to the New World but which is now extinct), Dishley Longhorn (a separate breed developed by Bakewell), etc.  Someone should split this Article and clarify the several different major breeds, perhaps with a separate article for each breed or, at a minimum, one article with a separate section for each.  Oconnell usa (talk)
:[{Texas Longhorn]] has a separate article, I see no reason not to create articles on the others.  I think this one maybe should be renamed to "English longhorn" (or whatever official name is out there) and "Longhorn" or "Longhorn cattle" be a dab.  But, as I don't have the time to actually do this, i'll just put it out as a friendly suggestion. Montanabw(talk) 17:20, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split and Clarify 
Talk:Sellers Bros.

message: I made a couple editing changes - small structure type changes. But I have been reading and editing random pages now for a bit, and I have to wonder, why is this page here?  Why is this business notable?  How are they different from every other smallish grocery store???K67 (talk) 19:39, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Old page, but why is this company notable?
Talk:Archaeopteris

message: Hello, I wonder if the fern-like tree  ( http://www.cnn.com/2007/TECH/science/04/18/tree.fossil.reut/index.html   )
should replace this article's stance as the oldest tree, or lead to another page within the year when more news comes around.
Just a question. :-D
-2007, 8th April
A fairly minor point regarding this section "The genus Archaeopteris is placed in the order Archaeopteridales and family Archaeopteridaceae. The name is similar to that of the first known feathered bird, Archaeopteryx, but in this case refers to the feather-like nature of the plant's fronds."
The name Archaeopteris doesn't refer to feathers at all. the Archaeo part means "ancient" and the pteris part means "fern". In the feathered bird the part pteryx means "feather". --Stocksdale, 2014, July 6.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stocksdale (talk • contribs) 17:38, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
Talk:Tatra T3

message: Does
* Romania was induced by the Comecon likewise in the end of the 1960er years to order act RA cars.
Mean
*Romania was induced by the Comecon likewise in the end of the 1960s in order replace RA cars.
Tabletop 02:25, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meaning ? 
Talk:Pteridospermatophyta

message: I am not sure how this new 'Automatic Taxobox' works but it has managed to put Lyginopteridopsida as an order, rather than a class that it actually is.  I realise that the original version that I edited had the Gigantopteridaceae (family) as an order (inherited from the original version) but that was something I intended to fix.  Alternatively, it may be best to just get rid of this attempt at a taxonomic structure here.  Pteridosperms is not really a taxon in any meaningful sense, just a 'grade-group' of early seed-plants.  As it stands, we are developing two parallel but essentially incompatible taxonomic structures: one based around Pteridosperms, the other structured around more natural groupings such as Cycadopsida, Ottokariopsida and Ginkgosida.  CCleal (talk) 21:31, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I attempted a rewrite of the paragraph in question. I think that a discussion of the validity of historical paleobotanical terms may be beyond the scope of this article but feel free to expand upon my edits.Fascinoma (talk) 03:01, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: The taxonomy for Glossopteridales here and in the Gloss... article do not align. I will put a similar note in the talk for that article, and perhaps someone can sort this out. Here we have Pteridospermatophyta>Dictyopteridiopsida>Rigbyales (=Glossopteridales). There we have Pteridospermatophyta>Glossopteridales. 2001:56A:F0E9:9B00:6D65:DBCA:8828:2997 (talk) 02:01, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Glossopteridales
Talk:Leonora Duarte

message: I think the lead could be more concise. For instance, I believe information about her baptism can be moved to the biography section. I also think that the introductory sentence could better showcase the subject's noteworthiness. Currently it states:
"Leonora Duarte (1610 – 1678?) was a Flemish composer and musician, born in Antwerp."
Where I think it could read:
"Leonora Duarte (1610 – 1678?) was a Flemish musician and composer who wrote the earliest music for viol by a woman in the 17th century."
Ashedryden (talk) 20:31, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit lead section for brevity, noteworthiness
Talk:Duchess of Lorraine

message: There is so little to say about the trouvère that I see no reason to have separate pages for her and the duchess with whom she is usually identified. All the information fits nicely on one page. If you would like to change the redirect destination of this page, go ahead. Just remove the dabnote at List of rulers of Lorraine when you're done. Srnec (talk) 21:08, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Why a redirect?
Talk:Frost*

message: Speculation about second album removed.  Chatting to Jem Godfrey and the others in person on Saturday night he gave no indication whatsoever of any 2008 release, and the remaining members of the band certainly don't know about it.  I wouldn't put it in the article even if they had, not without another reference to cite for verification.  Please stick to verifiable facts... -- Cain Mosni 02:40, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, well, well - it may be that the source of the rumour is none other than Jem Godfrey himself.  After the set at the Scala on Sunday (and also in his blog) he dropped some fairly unsubtle hints that in fact 2008 is a reasonable time at which to expect another release.  Of course none of this is fit for the article itself. -- Cain Mosni 17:15, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Second album

message: The official website is no longer online and the domain is for sale.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.217.125.158 (talk) 22:18, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Website
Talk:Kitty Play Records

message: This article was vandalized and remained that way for over a year without any additional edits.  Given the relative inattention given to this article, I've semi-protected it indefinitely to prevent further vandalism. —Darkwind (talk) 07:11, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. —KuyaBriBriTalk 13:36, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected
Talk:USCGC Vigilant (WMEC-617)

message: Eustis was not given a non-punitive letter of reprimand. (What is that, anyway? How can a letter of reprimand not be punitive?) Eustis was cashiered by order of the president. The Coast Guard investigation board recommended court martial, but the president dismissed Eustis from service and cited the incident of Captain Isaac Philips on the USS Baltimore as precedent. 
One of my friends sat on the investigation board. We argued the propriety of Eustis's dismissal many times. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.229.94.101 (talk • contribs) 11:06, October 12, 2014
:Perhaps you could provide a citation from a reliable source. Personal anecdotes can't be used as a reference. --Dual Freq (talk) 12:29, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Eustis
Talk:Creodonta

message: Recent papers by Sole (2013, 2014, etc) have split Creodonta into two new orders. Spaulding et al. (2009) did present a Creodonta which was made up of oxyaenids and hyaenodontids.
: And it is worth noting that in Spaulding et al. (2009), Creodonta was the sister to Carnivoramorpha (though sampling of non-laurasiatheres was weak).
--------
That Hyaenodon is definitely digitigrade.
--------
I'm not certain "cats being fed a vegetarian diet would go blind" statement should be included. It's mentioned frequently in biology books for kids but it is somewhat correct and somewhat incorrect, I think. Domestic cats indeed cannot manufacture taurine and would go blind if they were to only eat fruit and leafy greens and the like, but I don't think this applies for grain-fed diets and those are also vegetarian. Afaik most dry cat and dog foods are made from grains, no meat! Perhaps we should just mention the inability to manufacture taurine and the necessity to obtain it from dietary sources to prevent blindness and death?  --singe@ix.netcom.com 4:30, 27 Feb 2007 (PST)
:It seems irrelebvant in an article about creodonts, it is sufficient to say they rareely eat vegetables. I removed the line. Sabine's Sunbird  talk 18:33, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  It's definitely irrelevant and suspect considering we know nothing certain regarding the digestive physiology of creodonts. 71.236.93.51 (talk) 00:10, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: New mammalian orders: Hyaenodontida and Oxyaenodonta

message: The hyaenodon is drawn with digitigrade locomotion.  Isn't it supposed to have plantigrade feet? (First poster, do you mean that it is or that it is supposed to?) 12.144.50.194 (talk) 22:45, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hyaenodon wasn't exactly digitigrade, but, according to this skeleton, , it wasn't plantigrade, either.  Some creodonts were fully plantigrade, whereas others were more digitigrade, just like modern carnivores, it seems.  That section about plantigrade needs to be rewritten.--Mr Fink (talk) 22:56, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Digitigrade?

message: A variety of dates are suggested in the text and taxobox, few of them supported by in-line citations. Can we get a bit of professionalism back, please? Macdonald-ross (talk) 05:24, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates 

message: The section on Extinction has some interesting speculation but unfortunately I cannot find any sources for them. The one listed source, "Elements of Geology," is to a broken link, and the citation does not have enough bibliographical information for me to find it otherwise. I'd greatly appreciate if anyone knowledgeable about these speculations provides sources. AnthroMimus (talk) 12:33, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extinction