lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Quiet title

message: Material on this page was merged in from quiet title action, which now redirects here. BD2412 T 21:54, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Attribution

message: If you have some knowledge on Quiet title, could you please share how exactly you go about getting quiet title.  The steps involved, etc.  This would be very helpful! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 216.31.35.47 (talk) 19:11, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Getting Quiet Title 

message: Article currently reads: "Quiet title actions really have no applicability where a registration system is in place ..."
I believe that the word "really" is unnecessary to the meaning of the sentence, vaguely un-encyclopedic in tone, and should be removed.  Any objections?
Karl gregory jones (talk) 02:33, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Really" unnecessary 

message: See the two following statements within the article. The first is incorrect. The second is correct:
1.) An action to quiet title is a lawsuit brought in a court having jurisdiction over land disputes, in order to establish a party's title to real property against anyone and everyone, and thus "quiet" any challenges or claims to the title.
2.) Quiet title actions do not “clear title” completely. They are actions for the purpose of clearing a particular, known claim, title defect, or perceived defect.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Neetchah (talk • contribs) 21:17, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradictory Information Provided
Talk:Ute Mountains

message: I created this redirect page after starting the article offline and then realizing an article with the same purpose had been created under the "Ute Mountain" name. I intend to edit the "Ute Mountain" page. 
I will also place redirects under the alternate names "Sleeping Ute", "Sleeping Ute Mountain" and "Sleeping Ute Mountains" as all these names appear on various USGS quads and reports as well as on Garmin Mapsource and Topozone.com with some confusion as to what is the range name and what is the individual peak name within the range.
--Chris Foran 21:55, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Stack unwinding

message: This article doesn't yet mention what I think of as stack unwinding: following stack and frame pointers so as to find the stack frame for a particular function, starting from some called function (possibly nested many levels deep).
I don't know enough to write this part of the article, and it may or may not be distinct enough from "function stack" to warrant preventing the suggested merge. --Mike Van Emmerik 22:01, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm in favor of a merge, moving everything to function stack.  Alternatively, this could be sent to exception handling or continuation.  Thoughts? --Mgreenbe 23:12, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Sleeping Ute Mountains

message: I created this redirect page after starting the article offline and then realizing an article with the same purpose had been created under the "Ute Mountain" name. I intend to edit the "Ute Mountain" page. 
I will also place redirects under the alternate names "Ute Mountains", "Sleeping Ute Mountain" and "Sleeping Ute" as all these names appear on various USGS quads and reports as well as on Garmin Mapsource and Topozone.com with some confusion as to what is the range name and what is the individual peak name within the range.
--Chris Foran 22:03, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Centro Shopping America Trust

message: The wordings on "currently" is most certainly outdated, and should be placed in time. If the company is notable (and I guess it is) the article should be expanded, but the external links-section looks a bit overloaded to me. // Konvalj 02:32, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: The result of AFD was No Concensus.  See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Galileo Shopping America Trust. RJFJR 19:28, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: AFD
Talk:The Leaves

message: Data per WP:MUSIC:
* Billboard album chart peak #127 (Hey Joe)
* Billboard singles chart peak #31 (Hey Joe)
No other chart singles or albums.  No awards.  No major tours recorded.  Two albums released plus one 1982 compilation. Jim Pons went on to play briefly with The Turtles and Frank Zappa, but according to AMG this work was insignificant ocmpared with The Leaves.
Nationally borderline per WP:NMG but probably qualify due to local notability in California.
Just zis  Guy, you know? [T]/[C] (W) AfD? 22:07, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I don't have a copy, but long ago my body had an original pressing of the Hey Joe album and the back liner notes had the same story of the origin of the name that Nuggets had later. 
FWIW, between Hey Joe, and Bill Pons' later career, the band is notable enough for an article.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:602:9a00:1d4b:2562:a5f5:9f49:1ba5 (talk) 06:19, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Band Name
Talk:Fantasy literature

message: After starting editing this article, I realise that there is a parallel article History of fantasy, which focusses also on literature. Can anyone explain why WP needs these two articles? As far as I can see the previous merge discussion doesn't include this duplication of subject matter. Rwood128 (talk) 17:15, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: See also Fantasy: "History" . Perhaps History of fantasy should also be re-named "History of fantasy literature", as there is also the article Fantasy which deals with all media. This would reflect the contents of "History of fantasy" less ambiguously. Rwood128 (talk) 17:32, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: See these comments . Rwood128 (talk) 13:41, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplication with "History of fantasy" 

message: There are sources citing Sword of Shannara being the first paperback fiction to be in the New York Times bestseller list.  Whilst a minor point, I feel that since it was published in 1977, long before many other High Fantasy novels that its an important landmark to put into the article.
http://www.randomhouse.com/features/brooks/author/bio.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.7.5.89 (talk) 23:07, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terry Brooks overlooked in the history section. 

message: I felt article Islamic_literature is in bit of neglect so I added my note on talk page there, requesting to take note of Talk:Islamic_literature#Article_review. If possible requesting copy edit support. Suggestions for suitable reference sources at  Talk:Islamic_literature is also welcome. 
Posting message here too for neutrality sake
Thanks and greetings
Bookku (talk) 08:05, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Requesting wider attention

message: This article really needs a total overhaul. It's incredibly small, frankly, for such an expansive topic. It is incredibly shallow and far too narrow in its focus. I came here intending to add details about Chinese fantasy literature only to find out that there's not even a single reference to the topic! To say nothing of Japanese and various other national fantasy literatures. Reference to wuxia, for instance, belongs here, as well as shenmo. 
Philologick (talk) 08:19, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @Philologick: You might be looking for Early history of fantasy, which has a more international focus. Olivaw-Daneel (talk) 01:16, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

text: @Olivaw-Daneel: No, that's no less a shoddy article. It frankly amazes me that something as popular as fantasy has such dismal pages on Wikipedia. Even the wuxia page is better, despite being a little-known genre in the West!
Philologick (talk) 06:56, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  This needs a total rewrite
Talk:Owen Glynne Jones

message: The classic Abraham's picture of O.G.Jones  must now be 106 years old or more. Does this mean it's now Public Domain??? Linuxlad 22:21, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Later - I think the news is bad - UK copyright subsists from 70 years after death of last creator I believe, and George Abraham died in 1965.... Moreover, according to Hankinson most of the Abraham photos he reproduced (in 'Camera on the Crags') now belong to the Fell & Rock. Anyone know different??? Bob aka Linuxlad
Wikipedia is based in the US so US copyright law applies. Works created before 1923 are in the public domain in the US; see Public domain#Expiration. Gdr 15:52, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright

message: Was Glynne Jones actually born in Wales? If so, where? Linuxlad
Nope. London. See revised text. Silentrunner 03:00, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: where born?

message: Shall I put up the photo mentioned above? Silentrunner 03:02, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm trying to recollect the similar issue of copyright on the Napes Needle pic. (see Great Gable). My recollection is that Fell & Rock (FRCC) own it and it's current even the State of Florida's relaxed terms. Will check. :-) Bob aka Linuxlad 07:21, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright issue revisited
Talk:Kho khuat

message: If both ข and ฃ are pronounced [kʰ] initially and [k] finally, why was the distinction even created to begin with? What kind of phonemic/phonetic distinction did they originally reflect? Siúnrá (talk) 18:32, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I understand that the majority consensus is that there was a distinction that was probably lost around the 14th–15th centuries. The theory is that ฃ used to represent /x/, but became merged into ข in most Tai languages of the region. Anthony Diller 1988 covers this; there are a few others as well. --Paul_012 (talk) 05:30, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Difference in pronunciation
Talk:Clackmannanshire

message: This article is cluttered with infoboxes!  It needs to be expanded so the boxes don't interfere with each other's positions. Roy Al Blue 22:37, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Montgomery Improvement Association

message: As one of the two organizations that played critical roles in the Montgomery Bus Boycott, the Montgomery Improvement Association does deserve to be studied and recorded in its own entry; much of what relates to the MBB should be moved there, but the MIA article needs to be expanded by research into the MIA itself, and must balance out the entry on the rival pro-segregationist White Citizens Council which itself must be retained. Also, even if there is some information overlap, the MIA entry must be retained. Again, the MBB page ought to include more information on the Claudette Colvin case and the Browder v. Gayle case integrated into it. WikiSceptic 04:58, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I must say that I agree with WikiSceptic on the fact that the "MIA" deserves it's own article. But the information is redundant. Hence the suggestion for the merge. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk. 22:42, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  '''Strong Keep''' 

message: On February 1, 2006 this article was completely rewritten by an editor with no entries on either his home page or discussion page.  On February 4 and 5, a large amount of Timeline was placed in American Civil Rights Movement (1955-1968) and American Civil Rights Movement (1896-1954) by a similar "editor" - at least one line entered was completely bogus (and I so annotated it).  That editor no longer exists.  I will be advising administrators. Simesa 01:59, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible Bogus Entries 

message: Well, this article wasn't looking so well...so I tried to fix it up the best I could....but it looks like it requires more assistence. If someone else could help me out here...that'd be great. Thanks! Codejkoolguy 17:45, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fixing Article
Talk:Cañada del Oro

message: Another editor recently substituted "glen" as a translation for Cañada, and that is one meaning -- but makes no sense in local context.  Our article notes that "As early as 1880, the Cañada del Oro was labeled "Gold Cañon Creek" on American maps".  Another meaning of Cañada is ravine or barranca (Google Translate lists barranco, quebrada, cañada, garganta, encañada as "ravine" in English). So I think Cañada in context is best translated as "Canyon"  -- perhaps this was a local variant in colonial Mexican Spanish? I used to live near the Cañada, and always heard it translated as Canyon -- and the Cañada drainage is indeed a canyon (or ravine), where it comes out of the mountains. --Pete Tillman (talk) 22:23, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation of "Cañada" 
Talk:Studland

message: Someone who knows what he is doing what want to repair the map on this page, as it appears to me to show a yellow dot floating somewhere in France. — Grstain 23:03, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: What browser are you using?  It's working fine in Opera.  The best place to discuss this would be at Template:GBthumb.  Joe D (t) 01:25, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks AOK to me in Internet Explorer. Jeff Fenstermacher 01:26, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

text: And it looks okay to me now, also in Internet Explorer. It was probably one of those great mysteries of life. — Grstain 14:36, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Map

message: I have been there on Knoll beach, and I have noticed that the sand is the usual golden only in the top layer; the sand underneath is much darker (as you can notice digging a hole in the sand). Please notice that this is not due to the sand being wet, as it keeps this colour also once dry. Does anyone know why is the sand darker? Wx8 22:03, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sand Colour

message: Hello! During late June, July and some of August, I'm working on a paid project sponsored by the National Trust to review and enhance coverage of NT sites. You can find the pilot edits here, as well as a statement and contact details for the National Trust. I am leaving this message when I make a first edit to a page; please do get in touch if you have any concerns. Lajmmoore (talk) 17:49, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  National Trust pilot
Talk:John F. Sattler

message: This is my first REAL contribution to Wikipedia, well not really mine.  I took it from the Marine Corps website.  Feel free to edit.  Sadaukar 23:09, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Contribution
Talk:Symphony (grape)

message: The "white wine" page is a redirect to "wine."
Making a "white wine" wikilink in the article creats an ambiguation.
Perhaps edit the "white wine" page by writing an article about white wine, removing the redirect.
Gjs238 23:25, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Seleucia (disambiguation)

message: As you'll see by the history, this was a consolidated page, with 4 cities, and redirects for those cities back to this page.  Not good form. 
After consultation with the Help Desk, split text into the several existing redirects, and added as many more as could be found in the current Wikipedia, making this a true disambiguation page.
The form of many references was just Seleucia <region>, so that form was adopted for the main titles (or future redirects to whatever the current city name).  
But another common reference form has an intervening "di", "in", "of", etc.  That requires yet another 3 or more redirect pages each, or hand editting the links.  Since this disambiguation already required visiting nearly 100 of the existing links to this page, opted for embedding the pipe.   William Allen Simpson 23:25, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Corbeil, Ontario

message: It looks like the entry for this small town is complete. If not, before expanding on Corbeil, I say start articles on onther nearby palces like Astorville, Derland, Nosbonsing and Trout Lake, Lake Nosbonsing, and the La Vase River.   Cafe Nervosa | talk 23:28, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree. Much more can be said about Corbeil -- Earl Andrew - talk 23:40, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Someones listening.  Good.  How about the other places named?  They don't even have stubs started. Cafe Nervosa | talk 23:43, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: With time, of course :) -- Earl Andrew - talk 01:15, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Shanna Compton

message: This article survived an Articles for Deletion debate. The discussion can be found here. Owen× ☎ 23:28, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Articles for Deletion debate
Talk:Unforgettable

message: "What links here" used to show :Uładzimir Karatkievič, :Bill Holman, :Irving Gordon, :John Dahl, :Great American Songbook, :George Hurrell, :Callum Keith Rennie, :Kim Cattrall, :Lorna Luft, :1952 in music, :Billy Fury and of course, :Nat King Cole. Alf melmac 23:31, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Str8 off tha Streetz of Muthaphukkin Compton

message: Can someone fill in the production notes of who produced each song please  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.17.221.123 (talk) 06:47, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Producers 

message: Several books state the proper title case as "Str8 off tha Streetz of Muthaphukkin Compton" (like the article title) although, a couple capitalise the "o" in "off" like so: "Str8 Off tha Streetz of Muthaphukkin Compton". I am making changes to the article content based on these books. Please excuse the lazy referencing (I'm exhausted); I'll come by later to clean up after myself (or feel free to do it for me ;) ) I came back. Fred Gandt · talk · contribs 02:30, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Album title case
Talk:Nepidae

message: If I'm not mistaken, that section is entirely irrelevant & I'm removing it. This page deals with Nepid "Water Scorpions", which are a kind of insect. Hibbertopterid Water Scorpions were arachnids & were indeed related to terrestrial scorpions (although somewhat distantly). I will remove the section and place a link to the Eurypterids in the article. - Wyvern J. Wynderunner 01:05, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ancient Super Scorpions??? 

message: I checked ITIS, and as far as I can tell there are only three genera in Nepidae, namely Curicta, Nepa, and Ranatra, not 14 as stated in the article. Also I think the language could be simplified and that it should be made clearer that these insects have nothing but the common name and a vague similarity in common with actual scorpions. 213.112.196.179 (talk) 20:14, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of genera, difficult terminology, and clearer separation from real scorpions 
Talk:Andorran and the euro

message: The information I added was in the following email:
Dear Mr MYNAME,
Thank you very much for your question on the monetary negotiations with Andorra. These negotiations are still under way, though they have lost some momentum. A date for the possible conclusion of a monetary agreement and the issuance of euro coins by Andorra has not yet been proposed. As a consequence, until further notice there will be no "Andorran euro coins".
Kind regards, 
HISNAME
which I received from the Directorate General for Economic and Financial Affairs when I asked about this issue. Just FYI.  ナイトスタリオン ✉ 23:54, 1 December 2005 (UTC)

message: Hi, there's a discussion currently ongoing about the potential renaming or merge/redirecting of this and other articles at Talk:United Kingdom euro coins#Crystal Balls that you may want to look at.  I suggest that further discussion remain there.  Thanks. Pfainuk talk 12:24, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion at United Kingdom Euro Coins

message: The lead is extremely clumsily written. It looks as Andorra currently is using the Franc and Peseta abandoned by their home countries. Surely already Euro is the de facto legal tender? 惑乱 Wakuran (talk) 19:52, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Clumsy lead
Talk:Harrow

message: I fixed a few dozen redirects.  They all pointed at Harrow.  Some were for the tool so were more broken after the move than before.  The remainder were for the school, the college, the borough or the place in London, so those are now all better off than they were before.  Someone knowing more about the UK than I will need to fix the rest of them, as they're still ambiguous to me. Tedernst | Talk 03:32, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  links after redirect 
Talk:Union Day (Romania)

message: The WWI poster has no reason being there. It is about Romania's war entry, a good two years before. Also, the event marked is about Transylvania's union with Romania - it was the date of Transylvanians attending an Alba Iulia gathering, where they expressed their wishes to be part of Romania. (As such, the choice for the event was quite a misnomer, since the gathering itself did not provoke Transylvania's union per se, nor were its demands respected by the succeding Romanian governments - such as the request that the region be given full authonomy inside the Kingdom.) There is a nuanced connection with Bessarabia and Bukovina: Transylvania was the last of the three to join, and since this is thought to have happened following Dec. 1st, the date was extended to mean the "fulfilling of Romania's unity". Note: southern Dobruja IS NOT part of that arangement - it was an integral part of the kingdom since late 1913. I will get to reviewing the page at a later date. Dahn 23:58, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I fully agree with Dahn. Is anyone against removing the poster from this article? (Btw, I inserted the image into the Ferdinand I of Romania article some time ago, I guess it belongs there more than here). Mentatus 14:41, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The [[WWI]] poster

message: Cine v-a invatat istorie fratilor, astia de ati scris ca Regatul Romaniei s-a unit cu Transilvania, Basarabia, Bucovina si Dobrogea? Pai Regatul se uneste cu provinciile sau provinciile se unesc cu Regatul? Si cand s-a unit Dobrogea cu Romania (sau Romania cu Dobrogea, dupa cum ati scris)? Dobrogea de Sud a fost ocupata de Romania in al doilea razboi balcanic (1913) si deci n-a fost nici o unire a Dobrogei in 1918. The Vindictive 15:10, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cine cu cine s-a unit
Talk:Mickey Mouse universe

message: I think this should be renamed from "Mickey Mouse universe" to "Mickey Mouse & Friends". Mickey Mouse & Friends is the official name Disney uses for the universe with Mickey and his pals. The name is already used on the infobox so why not the article name itself?
Abuelo456 (talk) 19:18, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: "Mickey Mose & Friends" is actually the term used to design the combination of the Mickey Mouse universe and the Donald Duck universe. The term is mostly used when it comes to animation, since the boundaries between these two universes are less rigid and the characters often appear together, but the distinction is very important when it comes to comics. I think the article should be updated to explain this. --Newblackwhite (talk) 12:34, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

text: The article talks extensively about the "Mickey Mouse universe" rather than a particular franchise. Mickey Mouse & Friends is marketing-speak and sounds like the title of a series. Renaming the article would be confusing for readers. Toughpigs (talk) 18:00, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename this article

message: Shouldn't Pluto be moved to the section "Non-anthropomorphic supporting characters"? After all, he's the only non-anthropomorphic character listed in any other section than that one. JIP | Talk 22:03, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I think he's in the "Protagonists" section because he's a lead character; that section isn't split up into anthropomorphic vs not. Toughpigs (talk) 22:55, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pluto 

message: Mickey's cousin in "Love Trouble" was named Millicent van Giltmouse, not Madeline. This is evident in the dialogue throughout the story. 32.215.234.97 (talk) 13:27, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mickey's cousin in "Love Trouble"