lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:High priority free software projects

message: It is proposed that this article be deleted because of the following concerns:
* The subject matter is not notable enough for WP.
I disagree: it is relevant for the free software community.
* WP is also not a soapbox WP:SOAP.
Yes, but WP:SOAP itself says: "Of course, an article can report objectively about such things, as long as an attempt is made to approach a neutral point of view.", and I claim that the article is indeed a neutral description of the topic.
* It is also a duplicate of information on the FSF's web site.
This fact could make this article to be marked as a stub, but I don't consider this enough for deleting, because the FSF's web site is not a in Wikipedia. I have also added some information not on the FSF's web site.
* A sentence in the Free Software Foundation article is more then enough mention on WP.
This could lead to propose to merge this article with Free Software Foundation, instead of deletion.
Laurusnobilis (talk) 09:47, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge proposed. I don't see that this is a difficult call. Chris Cunningham (talk) 14:48, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, merge.  (If this discussion/strawpoll moves to Talk:FSF, feel free to copy to there my support for this merge.)  --Gronky (talk) 21:53, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Wathik Naji

message: :The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  
The result was keep, withdrawn by nominator, and move to Wathiq Naji. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:32, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Andy Baio

message: Full disclosure on potential conflict of interest: I (Flipzagging) started this page, and I know Andy Baio personally. I worked for him for a year, from about December 2006 to November 2007. We are not close friends but we are friendly. Following his departure from Yahoo, he is not my boss any more, and we only email occasionally.
I really feel that Andy Baio ought to have his own Wikipedia page, as he is a person of wide renown in the technology and blogging communities. When he left Yahoo, many people remarked that his going-away party was like a who's who of the so-called "Web 2.0" community. 
I have tried to make this first stab as objective as possible and provided numerous references. While there are a lot of links to Baio's blog, (Waxy.org) this is not an attempt to boost PageRank. It seemed necessary to provide proper citation.
--Flipzagging (talk) 09:52, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sycharth

message: The top line description should read "7 miles west of Oswestry". This section is not editable, it would appear. Verifiable through any map program e.g. Multimap old site 25,000 map.
217.205.89.7 (talk) 13:29, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 
Talk:Timeslides

message: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status:
1. Referencing and citation: pass 
2. Coverage and accuracy: pass 
3. Structure: pass
4. Grammar: pass 
5. Supporting materials: pass 
Nreive (talk) 15:39, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: In reception it states "The reason for Rimmer being briefly alive at the end of this episode is a popular area of debate among the shows fans", but no evidence is provided to support this. Even if a reliable source could be found, is it really a significant point in relation to the episode's reception? Dunarc (talk) 20:00, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I have no removed it as apart from the lack of citations it is arguably subjective and it is doubtful it can be seen a relevant to the reception of the episode (it was in the reception section). Dunarc (talk) 23:57, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious text
Talk:Carnage the Executioner

message: While saying something is from the Twin Cities might make sense to someone who lives there, there are dozens of places worldwide that label themselves as such. Might be an idea to confirm *which* twin cities this article is referring to? DermottBanana (talk) 00:39, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Twin Cities 

message: Hello my name is David Diaz and I am part of Carnage The Executioner's marketing team. I am inquiring to see what steps I need to take in order to make additions and changes on Carnage's Behalf. Thank you. Obnoxiouspizza (talk) 03:15, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi  you should propose edits on this talk page - please see WP:EDITREQUEST. -Kj cheetham (talk) 15:29, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major Edits on Carnage The Executioner's Behalf 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: not moved.   -- Vaulter 17:33, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Carnage the Executioner →  – technical move Lauraeshleman (talk) 15:13, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

text: This is a contested technical request (permalink).  — Amakuru (talk) 20:10, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

text: For more reason behind this request: I am a part of Carnage's marketing team and this request is from Carnage The Executioner himself. As a musician, he would like this page to align with how he identifies to his fans.  Lauraeshleman (talk) 23:44, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 19 July 2022
Talk:List of French films of 1930

message: To me, it makes more sense to alphabetize under the genuine first word in the title. Varlaam (talk) 05:39, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Le, La, Les 
Talk:Euranet

message: This topic currently has two articles about the same thing at different titles: European Radio Network and Euranet. They should be merged to a single article. Bearcat (talk) 15:01, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No worries...I've done that kind of thing myself before, too :-) Anyway, as a Canadian I'm not all that knowledgeable about this particular topic, but from what I can see my guess is that Euranet is the name that the network is actually going to use on the air — so if that's the case, then the article probably should be at that title. I've already posted this at WikiProject Europe if you think additional input would be helpful. Bearcat (talk) 15:46, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow, after reading the various press releases it's hard to know what the actual name will be. I suppose "Euranet" is somewhat language-neutral but the main announcement also seems to call this "Europe on the air" in all the languages I could translate. For now, I would suggest merging the content of Euranet into the better-written European Radio Network article and when it launches (or at least it's website launches) we can move it about, as required. - Dravecky (talk) 07:04, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge notice

message: The website and flickr account talk of Euranet Plus, not just Euranet. Is this a recent thing? Did they change their name? If so when? --1Veertje (talk) 00:00, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Euranet Plus
Talk:Jean Romaric Kevin Koffi

message: Does he has Italian passport? Matthew_hk tc 17:07, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Nationality

message: I don't have sufficient source to support the loan.  Matthew_hk tc 11:52, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Loan from Roma
Talk:The Necromancer; or, The Tale of the Black Forest

message: I tried to find and online version and didnt manage.I mean,the book is 214 years old,you CANT tell me its not in the public domain SOMEWHERE.
New Babylon 2 (talk) 13:18, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It is almost certainly public domain everywhere. There are copies in Internet Archive and Wikimedia Commons, and a transcription is being worked on in wikisource. -- Beardo (talk) 17:59, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Online copies

message: So, the article is clear, Teuthold's translation is deeply faulty. Yet, I notice that even the most recent De Valancourt edition is based on his text. Do we know if the German original survives and could be given a better translation? --Svartalf (talk) 11:57, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: https://www.amazon.de/Geisterbanner-Eine-Wundergeschichte-Lorenz-Flammenberg/dp/1979880190 -- Beardo (talk) 18:13, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do we know the original? 

message: The Northanger Abbey article says that the translator's real name was Peter Will. -- Beardo (talk) 18:14, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translator
Talk:Socialist Labour Group

message: The author(s) need to be more careful about their "facts", not to mention motives.
I'll limit myself to pointing out the need for two corrections:
Firstly, the Charlie Charalambous who writes for the Cyprus Weekly is not the same person as the Charlie Charalambous who was in the SLG, etc. Any basic search on the net will establish that the journalist in question has been writing for the Cyprus Weekly long before the ex-SLG member moved to Cyprus. FYI, the surname Charalambous is about as common in the Greek-speaking world as Williams is in the English-speaking world. Put this fact in the context of significant Cypriot emigration to/from Britain, and you have plenty of Charlie Charalambouses to sift through before making sweeping statements.
Secondly, the author(s) write "after the ousting of Charalambous", blah, blah. This is a complete fiction. The word "ousting" has a very specific meaning, implying a political fight ending in a conscious act. No such fight or act occurred, as anyone around at the time can confirm. The ex-SLG member simply moved to Cyprus from the UK for personal reasons. He did not break with the FI, and is still a member - which is more than can be said for Stefan Cholweka, to choose one name among the many mentioned.
Hambis07 (talk) 10:44, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Réseau des Bains de Mer

message: This article is under construction, please allow time for this before tagging! Mjroots (talk) 10:46, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: under construction

message: I've made a start, plenty more still to do though!. Mjroots (talk) 14:50, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Start Made

message: WikiProject France Assessment
This article was listed on WikiProject France under articles needing assessment.  This article has been rated start-class because:
*This is a great start and there are some references, which is good. I feel like some of the subsections could be expanded. Also, it would be interesting to see the notability/interest of this railway explained.
*There is a useful image.
Lazulilasher (talk) 18:38, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikiproject France Assessment 

message: Add section on Wars, and how lines were affected in the two world wars. Expand stations, add picture of each major station, add pictures of trains on the line. Expand freight section to cover other freight carried.  Add section on the line today, uses of trackbed, photos showing any visible remains.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjroots (talk • contribs) 09:17, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: To do

message: I have seen at least two references to the line closing in 1965. Do the 1947 and 1951 dates refer to the last dates the line was used, with 1965 being an official closure date, or is the 1965 date when the lines were actually lifted, having been left in situ since closure? Mjroots (talk) 14:20, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Answer found! The line saw occasional use until 1965. The sources were correct!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjroots (talk • contribs) 13:07, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Closure date?

message: Explain more about the World War II line to Ault and the Line de 100 jours.  Tristan Main (talk) 14:46, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: To Do
Talk:Jean-Jacques Chifflet

message: Many Shifflet, Shiflett, Shiplett and Shipplet families in western Virginia, USA, believe they are descended from the Chifflet family.
Are there any documents that can be cited ?  In recent years a few Chifflet have been visible on the internet.
G. Robert Shiplett (talk) 22:32, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Robert, if you have reliable sources that evidence this connection, you may want to list them at Talk:Chifflet. —Ringbang (talk) 14:35, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Virginian families 

message: Chifflet lived in the Duchy of Burgundy, which at the time was part of the Holy Roman Empire. Yes, it would become part of France later, but we should not retroactively place people in France who were not within the limits of France at the time.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:27, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Holy Roman Empire or France
Talk:Delay insensitive circuit

message: The idea of Dual rail encoding is preceded and was published much before the patent quoted. Don't pollute wikipedia...
You may be right. Could you tell us more? Where was it published (wp:v)?
--68.0.124.33 (talk) 15:25, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  history 

message: Please rename this page with "delay-insensitive circuit" : add a hyphen as there is compound adjective
Baba Arouj (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 10:15, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  rename 

message: Nobody including Alain Martin disputes that useful DI circuits can be
built from modules that contain unexposed isochronic forks internally,
as in the 1960's Macromodules project. Tom Verhoeff notes in his
doctoral dissertation that even simple logic gates such as an inverter
depend on internal isochronic forks to function. QDI circuits are
assumed in Martin's cited "Limitations" paper to be built from forks
and logic gates, so there's no rational justification to consider them any
less "limited" than DI circuits built from non-standard components.
Would you Wikipedia guys be cool with an outsider fixing this article
or do you like it the way it is? 78.32.159.157 (talk) 23:24, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for your suggestion. When you believe  needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes.  Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the edit this page link at the top. The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills.  New contributors are always welcome. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons you might want to).  --DavidCary (talk) 13:23, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  improve
Talk:Brahmagupta matrix

message: Hi. The Current Brahmagupta matrix formular is not accurate. It lacks a power sign. Please refer to Wolfram Website.
Regards,
Minh Tue.
I agree. See the B^-n to see what it should be. So I fixed it. Missing ^n is now in place.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.45.42.17 (talk) 14:00, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Mariah Carey videography

message: There are two videos for vision of love, however one isn't released( :D too lazy to search the interview but it's from mariah herself)... There are other unreleased ones I think... anybody got some info?  <sInsert formula herepan style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.179.115.20 (talk) 22:17, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: "Vision of Love"

message: Where is the video for O Holy Night? I believe it came out in 2000 or around the Charmbracelet era. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rt0VfiFxtHo&feature=PlayList&p=50B8E109F3E05F7F&index=0  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Puckeylut (talk • contribs) 17:32, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  O Holy Night  

message: A great deal of these directors are questionable.  Citing that Shapiro book seems to be an easy out for people who don't have an actual citation.  Most of those citations are false.  The directors who can't be correctly cited should be removed. 100.10.43.24 (talk) 05:12, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Music Video Directors 

message: I think the ETV videos are not official Carey's videos, they shouldn't be included here.--88marcus (talk) 02:34, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  ETV videos are not official ones.
Talk:Taxation in China

message: It seems about time to update the tax breakdown at the bottom of the article. It's from 1997 for goodness' sake! 184.100.134.202 (talk) 23:17, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Update

message: Easily-accessible online sources on Chinese topics can be difficult to find - China Tax Insights is a blog that seems pretty good, and seems to have some peer-reviewed articles on it as well. I think it is an acceptable external link. II | (t - c) 17:25, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is there a reason all the various kinds of taxes are capitalized in the Types of taxes section, e.g. "Value-Added Tax, Consumption Tax and Business Tax"? They're not proper names. ehn (talk) 15:41, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalization
Talk:Cristina Vee

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Not moved   (t · c) buidhe 14:41, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Cristina Vee →  - She prefers to be referred to by her full namehttps://twitter.com/CristinaVee/status/1327317827628371968?s=20 so we should change the page name accordingly.
– Link20XX (talk) 04:24, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 8 January 2021 

message: Per WP:CATDEF, do not add :Category:Nintendo people. She is not a staffer for Nintendo. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 13:18, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nintendo people
Talk:Takamine (guitar manufacturer)

message: Any idea how "Takamine" is pronounced? Thanks 89.148.43.17 (talk) 12:23, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Takamine Pronunciation? 

message: I don't believe Takamine makes Jasmine anymore. They no longer say "By Takamine", the Jasmine website makes no mention of it and they changed the headstock design. I am going to remove that line from the site. Here is the site to verify http://www.jasmineguitars.com/--Brian Earl Haines (talk) 02:06, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jasmine Guitars
Talk:Stick–slip phenomenon

message: Hi, any information out there regarding surging or pulsation of conveyors ?
:Hi i am investigating it now. So far it seems that there are 2 main parameters witch has the biggest influence. 1) the flexibility of the conveyor chain what is also often a result of the length. 2) the difference between static and dynamic friction.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnbroers (talk • contribs) 06:44, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slip stick effect on conveyors 

message: Not mentioning the most common and important application of a welcome 
sick-slip motion is ridiculous! Ever heard of making violin strings vibrate 
by the friction of the bows hairs impregnated by some rosin? 
And, less welcome: sometimes a pice of chalk on a blackboard?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.221.232.158 (talk) 13:20, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: In the examples section bowed instruments are mentioned specifically. Mikenorton (talk) 15:33, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Violins and Bows
Template talk:Most populous cities in the People's Republic of China

message: As creator of this template, I am requesting people to help make the template more accurate in its content. I created the list based on the information provided from Wikipedia itself; so I can't determine its accuracy.
Angcr (talk) 12:59, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accuracy of content 

message: 31 mln of inhabitants in Chongqing means in the "municipality" (district), composed with lot of towns, villages, cities, and Chongqing (City) proper, who is inhabited by 4,100,000 people. Also note that Chongqing Municipality (82,300 km²) is great as Austria (83,872 km²). So, IMHO, it could be also necessary to create another page, about the district.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.11.22.233 (talk) 23:23, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: A city of 4 million does not consider populous and a big city? Either that or i'm getting the wrong idea of what you're trying to imply here. Also, as stated by the creator of this template, the information may need some upgrading. --LLTimes (talk) 03:56, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Chongqing (the city and the municipality)

message: Our article on Hefei says:
:Hefei has an area of 11,434.25 km2 (4,414.79 sq mi) and, at the 2015 sampling survey, a population of 7,790,000 inhabitants, 5,484,000 of whom are urban.
Cities listed on this template reach down to Zhengzhou, with a population of only 3,677,000, but Hefei does not appear.  Why not?  —Mark Dominus (talk) 15:42, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where is Hefei?
Talk:Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives

message: There's more to be had from Whitehead, particularly on the work that JECFA does. Uncle G (talk) 13:03, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion 

message: This free paper (doi 10.1080/19440049.2013.795293) affirms:
It uses the present tense and the paper has been published in 2013. The lates report described in the Wp article dates back to 2005.Philosopher81sp (talk) 21:53, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is still active? 

message: The content on this page was replaced with more current and up to date work of JECFA. Various links are also included to guide the readers to databases where all of the JECFA reports can be found as well as pages with information on the various Codex Committees.  Benuni (talk) 14:56, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replacing current content
Category talk:Articles needing expert attention

message: If any editors would be willing to categorize this list by subject matter (even very broadly), it might be much easier for experts to find articles they could help improve.  Sorry if I'm missing something that would let me browse by category; I will keep looking.
:Go to :Category:Articles needing expert attention, where it is sorted by subject matter. Harryboyles 04:12, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:1,4-Cyclohexanedione

message: The depicted structure is that of quinone. V8rik (talk) 17:31, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 20:04, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  wrong chemical structure 

message: 1,2-Cyclohexanedione is used for Asparagine modofication, so is quite important in protein analysis  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.92.90.128 (talk) 15:57, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  1,2-Cyclohexanedione
Talk:Portchester railway station

message: "Announced today, Porchester railway station is to be closed down during the Christmas Holidays with the loss of one job. Rail customers are urged to use either Fareham or Cosham station instead."
Can anyone provide a source? Harper Collins is greater than j00 (talk) 13:26, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: not likley, sure it wasn't last winter's Portsmouth area resignalling or something ??? 91.109.230.127 (talk) 14:18, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Closure ?
Talk:Carlton Castle

message: Note that all the 4 refs given above talk about Castle Hill, Castle Carlton.    Castle Carlton is the name used on the OS map for a modern hamlet at Rookery Farm TF 3980 8368,   and for the DMV at  TF 3965 8353
Nowhere is the castle called  called Carlton Castle, though that name was used for the village/parish.quoting The Comprehensive Gazetteer of England and Wales, 1894-5  
Robert EA Harvey (talk) 20:53, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Name