Talk:WBCN (FM)

message: :Image:WBCN-FM.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 03:22, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:WBCN-FM.jpg

message: I'm going to revert the IP address who added back all of the unnotable alumni to the list, based off the idea of what should be notable for a University alumni which is similar to a radio station. A list like this should not be exhaustive but rather an emblematic list of notable examples.Curtis (talk) 01:59, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps the history on the website should but this is an encyclopedia. Nothing should be added that isn't verifiable and also notable. In the case of this article only certain people in the alumni section are notable. Generally on wikipedia lists of people like this are limited to emblematic examples (i.e. the most notable people that are unique) this is not the place to have a list of everyone who has ever worked for a radio station.Curtis (talk) 22:52, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Station Alumn

message: Is defunct the proper term for WBCN, as the station still exists, but is now HD only?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.88.213.74 (talk) 19:13, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks to whoever changed the title back
70.88.213.74 (talk) 20:28, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Defunct?

message: I'm removing the section called "2011: Attempting a Comeback" from the article, as the entire section lacks WP:RS, and is mostly WP:TRIVIA.  It is totally without sources (let alone reliable ones), and contains, at best, original research by fans, and possibly insider information.  It started out with the dubious statement "WBCN began a slow and thought out campaign to attempt to return to an analog and HD1 digital station."  The programming called "WBCN" is CBS Radio.  If CBS Radio wants to move a playlist to an analog station and change its callsign to WBCN, it will do so; it doesn't need to "attempt" it.  Likewise, CBS Radio telling people they should listen more often to a CBS Radio audio feed is not notable.  It also contained trivia such as what website was redirected to what else on what date, and what dates specific programs were moved around; see WP:TRIVIA and WP:NOTNEWS.
In addition, the rest of this article has very few sources also.  The information, as interesting as it looks, has no evidence, and so needs to be removed as lacking WP:reliable sources and WP:Verifiability so that it doesn't get passed around further, unless someone comes up with sources for all of it soon.  A year and a half without citations is quite enough, and it seems that, instead of paying attention to the maintenance tags, people just keep piling on more and more unsourced detail instead. --Closeapple (talk) 04:58, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  2011 return 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on WBCN (FM). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080511170136/http://www.radioandrecords.com/Conventions/con2007/awards/indexFinal.asp to http://www.radioandrecords.com/Conventions/con2007/awards/indexFinal.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:04, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The 1969 broadcast was not of the March 'Get Back' acetate. It was a broadcast of a tape copied from an earlier compilation acetate, never intended for release, and for reference purposes only. It's a distinct disc, with different versions to the Get Back acetates. See here for example: http://www.beatlesource.com/bs/mains/audio/GetBack/comp1/kumback.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:32FD:5600:ACC9:28B3:7668:18F9 (talk) 20:53, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in Beatles section 

message: As a general practice, Wikipedia radio station articles should detail the history of radio stations by the licenses. There honestly exists no reason for this page to be separate from that of WWBX. On August 12, 2009, WBCN simply changed their call letters to WBMX and format from rock to AC; the now-defunct internet/HD subchannel bearing that name wasn't really related but could be considered a successor to said station. Nathan Obral (talk) 02:36, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 11:50, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging WBCN (FM) to WWBX 

message: History of WBCN in the 50's and earlier 60's seems to be missing from this article. Is there any reason for not including the place WBCN played as the Boston hub of the Concert Network pre 1968?  
I would add that when WBCN switched format from classical/concert music to rock, the owners, studios, and transmitter location all stayed the same.  (Personal knowledge.)
MyNotes: Work-in-progress
https://www.bostonradio.org/stations/26897 seen 22Oct2020
WBCN first took to the airwaves in May 1958 as a standalone classical FM known as the “Boston Concert Network”. WBCN was part of a group of “Concert Network” stations, including WXCN 101.5 Providence (now WWBB), WHCN 105.9 Hartford, WRCN 103.9 Riverhead, N.Y., and WNCN 104.3 New York (now WAXQ). WBCN's studios were then located at 171 Newbury St. in Boston's fashionable Back Bay neighborhood.
By the late 1960s, WBCN began to feel the competition from other classical outlets, including WGBH 89.7 and WCRB/WCRB-FM. WBCN began leasing out time at night for ‘underground rock’ broadcasts, under the name “The American Revolution”. The first rock song heard on WBCN, on March 15, 1968, was “I Feel Free” by Cream.
Within a year, WBCN had become a full-fledged rock station, and classical music was history on 104.1. 
Olddog55 (talk) 23:55, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  WBCN History pre-1968