Template talk:Terrorism

message: I removed it as irrelevant. A co-editor has a different opinion. --JokerXtreme (talk) 14:04, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  US-led Campaign War on Terror's relation to this template's subject 

message: Currently, the link to Saffron Terror is from the Hindu link under the Religious section in this template. However, Saffron terrorism isn't a religious terrorism, it's a political one, as the article states. It is based around Hindu nationalism and Hindutva. This is political/nationalist terrorism, not religious. It should probably be moved around in the template. It's more a subsection of Right-wing terrorism. SilverserenC 04:29, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I've gone ahead and moved it myself. I don't think anyone is really going to comment on here anyways, so I might as well just make the change and then respond to any disagreement if it occurs. SilverserenC 18:53, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: That's kool... Yep, be bold :p. There's only 48 watchers anyways, hehe.    ~ AdvertAdam  talk 08:59, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: * I have added Hindu terrorism along with Buddhist and Sikh terrorism as the Safforn terror is not entirely an political terrorism. Part of it is a religious terrorism. Thanks, --- Buzzzman 19:10, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hindu (Saffron) terrorism in the wrong place 

message: This template is one of the worst I ever seen. Terrorism is not a end by itself, it's a mean some organizations tried to achieve its goals. By that, it should not be treat isolated of the others, but in conjunct with the context inserted. Jack Bufalo Head (talk) 14:29, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Worst template ever 

message: As previously denied, I attempted adding a "Most Wanted" area; which is in my opinion, a part of Terrorism. The Code is in development, though reverted, I am asking the community if a "Most Wanted" area should be incorporated. It includes article links such as: Saudi list of most wanted suspected terrorists Twillisjr (talk) 17:30, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Most Wanted" Area Request 

message: Shouldn't it redirect to Anarchism, like would happen if we typed anarchist in the search box? TimTempleton (talk) (cont) 21:43, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why does anarchist here redirect to [[Propaganda of the deed]] 

message: In a recent edit, the image below was added to the top of the template. That edit was later reverted, citing issues with the ways that thumbnail previews use the image. Should the image be included in the terrorism template?
*Option 1. Yes, the image should be included atop the template. (as in this revision)
*Option 2. No, the image should not be included atop the template. (as in this revision)
— Mhawk10 (talk) 07:00, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Delete the template. ~ cygnis insignis 03:59, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: That can't be done here, you'd have to go through WP:TFD. --Aquillion (talk) 22:21, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfC: Terrorism image 

message: *Option 1. In general, it is a good practice to include related images atop many sorts of sidebars. There is no image of terrorism that is more iconic and appropriate than that of a plane hitting the World Trade Center on 9/11. If we're going to have an image to represent the subject, and we should, then the image of the 9/11 terrorist attacks seems like the most appropriate one. — Mhawk10 (talk) 07:00, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Delete the template. ~ cygnis insignis 03:59, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: That can't be done here, you'd have to go through WP:TFD. --Aquillion (talk) 22:21, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion: Terrorism image

message: As the article Hindu terrorism does not describe this as a religious terrorism, and as it is not categorized as religious terrorism, this sidebar should also not link to it under religious terrorism. Only when the article describes "Hindu terrorism" as religious terrorism should it be added in this way in the sidebar. The sidebar and similar such templates should not make claims that go beyond what the article says. —Alalch E. 08:09, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Category:Hindu nationalist terrorism is categorized as :Category:Religious terrorism. At the risk of stating the obvious, "religious nationalist" anything is just a subdivision of "religious" anything. It is all religious nationalist extremism, which is still religious extremism, just one level down. Religious nationalism is politicized religion, as that page explains. Under Religious_nationalism#Muslim_nationalism it has Hamas, the Taliban and al-Shabaab - are you saying that because these might be Muslim nationalists, they are not Islamic terrorists? Iskandar323 (talk) 08:20, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I wasn't aware that this category which you created recently was added to the Religious terrorism category. I understand that you created the category under this name when you thought that the title that I had boldly moved to was adequate, and that you want the category to ultimately be named Hindu terrorism. The article has to say that Hindu nationalist terrorism or Hindu terrorism have a religious motivation for this topic to be categorized as religious terrorism. A sidebar can not say it for the article. Categories should not imply statements not given explicitly in the article. Definitions are given in prose not implicitly, in navigation templates and categories.—Alalch E. 09:13, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, well I believe I have made the connection plain now with an array of reliable sourcing. Iskandar323 (talk) 09:29, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you.—Alalch E. 10:47, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclusion of "Hindu terrorism" as religious terrorism