lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Law of Northern Ireland

message: To fall in line with the likes of English law, Welsh law, and Scots law, this article should be renamed to Northern Irish law, with Northern Ireland law redirecting to the new title. — JivanP (talk) 00:24, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the current title (Law of Northern Ireland) is more appropriate, because it refers to the law that "applies" in Northern Ireland, rather than law "made" in Northern Ireland. The Law of Northern Ireland is made up of a mixture of law passed in Northern Ireland (Northern Irish law), Ireland (pre-1922) (Irish Law), London (UK law) and Brussels (EU law).5.179.64.117 (talk) 10:58, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename article to "Northern Irish law" 

message: I propose merging Northern Ireland legislation into Law of Northern Ireland. The former doesn't appear to have enough material to justify an article of its own, and is merely a part of the latter. 212.129.81.72 (talk) 20:30, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Release from Agony

message: wheres the artwork for this album?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.178.21.30 (talk) 17:24, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Artwork?
Talk:Bharat Nalluri

message: hallo Bharat,
iam raghunath babu,s/o kosaraju madanagopalarao of repalle,brother of dr.ramesh babu,which early years he was algeria and at that time he came to your resm also.yor sister manju & your brother suresh & yor father chandramouli mamaiah,& mummy both are well known to me.If u remember me give me mail to my mail add. krbabu5068@yahoo.com
now iwas staing in hyderabad since 30years.
thanking you
RAGHUNATH BABU KOSARAJU.
:I'm not sure this is exactly the best way of trying to contact Nalluri directly — I doubt whether he even knows this page on him exists. Your best bet would probably be to try and get in touch through Kudos Film & Television, for whom he has often worked. Their contact details can be found here. Angmering 14:24, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:EuroBasket 1987

message: the current Version is completely wrong, is the version that is vandalized by blocked troll--2A02:587:4401:687E:8462:109D:48CA:79C (talk) 15:57, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  current version 
Talk:Hem

message: The section on hem repair seemed to have been copied from , in violation of copyright. I have reverted the article to the version immediately previous to the addition of the copyvio material. --Alvestrand 19:38, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violation 

message: I think this article would have better flow if the "Hem types" section opened with a list of hem types. As a reader, I would expect a list of hem types under this section so that I could see them all in one place. I've added a few of the most common hem types.  YellowDocMartens (talk) 18:27, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add List of Hem Types 

message: Home science grade  5 41.81.141.127 (talk) 18:42, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Home science grade 5
Talk:Toro Rosso STR2

message: This page is created to replace Scuderia Toro Rosso STR02 due to the team confirming that car name is STR2, not STR02.MonkeyMumford 13:44, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

message: Is it okay to remove the "Cleaning" tag now that the article has been tidied a little bit.  This would then allow the text to go alongside the information box, and that in itself would make it look a little tidier.  Just wanted to ask instead of just removing.
Cheers
Formula1fanatic 19:09, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleaning 
Talk:Robert Hunter Morris

message: Something is making it's way around the internet (maybe for some time) about a Scalp Act decreed by Morris: "On April 8, 1756, Governor Robert Morris enacted the Scalp Act. Anyone who brought in a male scalp above age of 12 would be given 150 pieces of eight, ($150), for females above age of 12 or males under the age of 12, they would be paid $130." StanlyKupp (talk) 01:37, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scalp Act of 1756
Talk:Repeated sequence (DNA)

message: — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raspberry Neuron (talk • contribs) 18:01, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

message: Considering adding genetic reasons for repeated sequences such as improper crossing over.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ElliotGrady (talk • contribs) 23:15, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ideas
Talk:Otto Warburg (botanist)

message: Why is there no eleborate writing in this article on the extensive role and influence of Otto Warburg in International Politics as President of the World Zionist Organisation. For instance the primary goal of the World Zionist Organisation was creating a homeland for Jews in Palestine. For this they had to get compliance with countries ruling Palestine. Since Turkey would not complie they had to dismantle the Turkish power in the region, in which they clearly succeeded by funding the Entente against the Centrals. The World Zionist Organisation also had an extensive role in the creation of the Balfour Declaration of 1917 and the Paris 1919 negotiations leading to the treaty of Versailles and the new World order after WW1. Which eventually were the precursors of the second world war and the tensions in the middle still not solved until now (Which they are now trying to solve by creating Western powerbases in Afghanistan and Iraq, and by stimulating and arming democratic revolutions within the arabic world). 82.169.234.28 (talk) 10:08, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Role of Warburg in International Politics 
Talk:Warburg family

message: why is that part in the intro talking about the Warburgs financing Hitler in bold?Dickmojo (talk) 13:27, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Starting a bank takes a lot of money, where did the Warburgs get their money from?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.165.137.199 (talk) 16:44, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: SOURCES OF FINANCE
Talk:Circular DNA

message: Ist the mentioned odd twisting, giving a Moebius strip, really possible?  AFAIK the two strands run in opposite directions, so the covalent closure would need to connect 3' with 3' ends or 5' with 5'. --Ralf Muschall (talk) 11:29, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moebius 

message: Circular DNA is also found in the form of plasmid DNA. I feel as though you should mention that form of DNA because it is circular. Then perhaps give an example of organisms with plasmid DNA.  Arjbajarj (talk) 05:48, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestion

message: This page has previously been a short article and then a redirect, but per consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Molecular and Cellular Biology#Circular DNA, I've converted it to a disambiguation page. Adrian J. Hunter(talk•contribs) 13:44, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Conversion to dab
Talk:The Conclave

message: I've just added the part about the magazine being launched which should (despite not actually having an issue out yet) stop the page being deleted - I forgot all about the magazine when I first wrote the article, and I don't have an intimate knowledge of wiki rules®ulations, so I didn't realise something like that was needed, my fault. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sherrif of Bat Country (talk • contribs).
:Publishing an "Internet magazine" does not meet any of the criteria listed at WP:WEB. --Pak21 14:03, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: How is this not yet published magazine either "well known" or "independent of the creators" (of The Covenant)? --Pak21 08:13, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:DNA shuffling

message: Wow this is a 1:1 copy of the reference linked to (it's a Science website). Good job there. I say...copyright...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.132.45.30 (talk) 16:52, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, this page really should be reworded to avoid plagiarism. Pdcook (talk) 18:33, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm going to go ahead and remove that stuff from the Science article. Pdcook (talk) 17:04, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:DNA adduct

message: I think someone with the knowledge should rewrite the article. The definition makes it seem as if a chunk was separated from DNA and bound to a chemical. --CopperKettle 05:02, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Unclear

message: Not all the DNA adducts are cancer-causing. DNA can form adducts with anticancer drugs such as cisplatin, oxoplatin, etc... 
Draentropia (talk) 10:28, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  It is not OK
Talk:DNA ladder

message: Do not merge. The dicussion on this merger can be seen on DNA laddering dicussion page. But to reiterate the point, a DNA ladder is a tool in molecular biology. And DNA laddering is a phenomena observed when a cell undergoes apoptosis. The two are identical to one another as a vegetable is to a vegetarian. 
--Perneseblue (talk) 23:50, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It is, however, same as the DNA section on Molecular weight size marker, so should be merged with that one. Hzh (talk) 09:12, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:A-DNA

message: Please link to the German Artikle A-DNA (de.wikipedia.org)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.206.64.26 (talk) 18:42, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [Untitled] 
Talk:DNA laddering

message: Yes, they should be merged.  When I created DNA Laddering, there was an existing DNA Ladder but it was a redirect to DNA electrophoresis.  I changed it to a redirect to here.  Somebody undid that redirect and started adding adding the information there.
I don't really care at which place the info lives.  But there can't be any significant difference between them.
David.Throop 00:07, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I'm convinced—there's good reason not to merge.  Instead, each article should at least briefly mention the other and explain the difference.David.Throop (talk) 13:17, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

text: Alright I take it it's only still there because no one's been watching this page that often. I'm going to remove it. Somewildthingsgo (talk) 19:11, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging

message: Suggest that DNA Laddering be removed from the lab technique category as it is not a technique but rather the result of one. Alberrosidus (talk) 21:37, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, the assay used to create the laddering is known to me as the "DNA ladder" assay, but there is already another article by this name. So although the laddering is technically only a result of a technique, I think the category should be kept, as the article is not only about the result, but also about the technique itself. -- Shinryuu (talk) 11:29, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Category
Talk:Exogenous DNA

message: Are there any uncommonly used methods of artificial transection? I re-arranged the sentence "Commonly used methods of transection are..." to put the subject, transection, at the front. To simplify it I took out "commonly used" in favour of "methods... include". It's arguable that the list is not exhaustive and the ones mentioned are the commonest or easiest. I added "artificial" since the list did not include, e.g., viral infection. 
Finally, I unravelled the string "artificial transection methods" into "Methods of artificial transection" to put the most meaningful words at the end of the phrase where they are easier to remember. The first pattern requires the reader to hold "artificial" and "transection" in mind, then apply them to methods, then go on. The second pattern lets the reader comprehend the two halves of the phrase in order.
--Monado (talk) 16:37, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commonly used methods? 

message: Should not Plasmids be mentioned somewhere within this article? They link to the transformation page, so I would assume they are some sort of Exogenous DNA. I don't know enough about the subject to write about them myself. Lee (talk) 00:42, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plasmids?
Talk:Sticky and blunt ends

message: If anyone is knowledgeable on the subject it would probably be a good idea to include the definition and an example of "frayed ends" as well.
--Peter K. (talk) 20:28, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion for additions 

message: Biologicalworld.com has spammed wikipedia like no tomorrow. He is a site of only a few pages and a LOT of adsense. Not much information is given except for "protocols" which are not referenced, and cannot be trusted from a site of that quality. 
check: Links from Wikipedia
The following have been cleaned up:
*en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasmid
*en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gel_electrophoresis
*en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green_fluorescent_protein
*en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homology_(biology)
*en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HeLa
*en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protease
*en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Restriction_enzyme
*en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petri_dish
*en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Structural_domain
*en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trypsin
*en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oligonucleotide
*en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transmission_electron_microscope
*en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agar_plate
*en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calcium_phosphate
*en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disulfide_bond
*en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denaturation_(biochemistry)
*en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNA_ligase
*en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wild_type
*en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tissue_culture
*en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transmission_electron_microscopy
*en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reporter_gene
*en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northern_blot 
*en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protein_engineering
*en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sticky_end/blunt_end
*en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taq_polymerase
*en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protein_domain
*en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coomassie
*en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Native_state
*en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_Hamster_Ovary_cell
*en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peptidase
*en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visking_tubing
*en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streptavidin 
*en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microtiter_plate
*en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subcloning
*en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ion_exchange_chromatography
*en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermal_cycler
*en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bovine_serum_albumin
*en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phosphate_buffered_saline
*en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glutathione_S-transferase
*en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HEPES
*en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ortholog
*en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proteases
*en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salting_out
*en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fetal_bovine_serum
*en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proteolytic_enzyme
*en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNA_end
*en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supernatant
*en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ABTS
*en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conserved_sequence
*en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peptide_mass_fingerprinting
*en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dithiothreitol
*en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uranyl_acetate
*
*
*
*
and many more Sciencetalks (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 03:07, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spamming Wikipedia 

message: The article title refers to both sticky and blunt ends, but the lead section only defines the sticky ends. Χρυσάνθη Λυκούση (talk) 07:04, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blunt ends
Talk:DNA-binding protein

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
In reading this article I realized that the introduction begins with explaining what DNA-binding proteins are, but also includes description on major grooves, minor grooves and functional groups that are not presented in more detail throughout the body of the article. Could simplifying the introduction lead to a better understanding of what the content will focus on? 
Soccer920 (talk) 03:48, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Feed Back Regarding Introduction
Talk:Thylakoid

message: I'm suggesting to merge granum into this page. I'm not sure how much there would be to say about grana besides the fact that they are stacks of thylakoids. - tameeria 14:27, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Do it.  If we have more to say later we can split the article.  Its much better to have these related topics on the same page. David D. (Talk) 16:20, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Found another one: Thylakoid lumen probably should also be merged here. - tameeria 17:41, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Agreed, both of them are tiny articles and more like definitions. David D. (Talk) 18:11, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

text: I've done the merge. The article might still require a bit of cleaning up for duplicated statements etc. - tameeria 18:58, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge 
Talk:Minimum Security

message: Why is this article noteworthy enough to be included in an encyclopedia?   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.196.205.92 (talk) 07:56, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability? 
Talk:Receptor tyrosine kinase

message: It would be helpful to have a picture of the RTK on the surface with the different parts labeled.  Maybe even a diagram from receptor to phosphorylation and back.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.23.69.71 (talk) 18:59, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled 1

message: "Receptor tyrosine kinase" and "receptor tyrosine kinase protein" are apparently names for certain receptors.  Why are they not called "tyrosine kinase receptors"? Unfree (talk) 12:14, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Why is this receptor not called a receptor?

message: One of the easiest to understand and clearest articles I have read on wiki.  Thanks to the author for putting up a description that even a layperson can understand.  -jorgekluney  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.53.46.141 (talk) 17:11, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Very Clear

message: How do I add a picture that i made to this article? Tahmmo (talk) 13:12, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled 2

message: I added information about how ligand binding is important for initiating or stabilizing receptor dimers, which is an important step allowing the signal to move through the plasma membrane. I wasn't sure if I should add additional information about how after the first tyrosine of the cytoplasmic side of the receptor is phosphorylated by its partner, additional phosphorylation steps(either cis or trans) can occur that will allow SH2 and PTB binding. 
Maximus155 (talk) 21:18, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Signal Transduction 

message: I thought that the addition of a specific example of a ligand may have made it less clear because (a) this was a ligand that many readers may be unfamiliar with, (b) this ligand does not interact with the insulin receptor that is used as an example in the preceding sentence, and (c) it seemed like extraneous information IMHO. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Biolprof (talk • contribs) 20:10, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverted "structures" edit 

message: Shouldn't the mechanism of phosphorylation of Tyrosine be at least explained, if not also illustrated, either here or in the article  "Protein phosphorylation"? lifeform (talk) 20:09, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Tyrosine phosphorylation mechanism

message: Dimerization is an important aspect of the RTK pathway. Would have loved if it was more emphasized in the article Ncameron2013 (talk) 19:18, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dimerization

message: Could have incorporated more of the historical events that led to the discovery of the RTK Ncameron2013 (talk) 19:16, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled 3
Talk:Alcohol in the early modern period

message: I emailed David J. Harmon, the author of the text on which this article is based and putatively the same person as User:David Justin who created the page, to make sure this wasn't a copyright violation. He responded, "I posted those articles with the understanding that I relinquished copyright by doing so." --Flex (talk|contribs) 14:17, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright status
Talk:Cat registry

message: This page shares content with Messybeast.com's articles about cat registries.  Messybeast is the author of both.  This is not copyvio.Messybeast 14:17, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

message: I don't think "The Traditional Cat Association" belongs here with the respectful cat associations. There have been too many controversies regarding its pedigree practises, authoritarian management and bussiness oriented attitude. The hidden link that leads right to their website is at least inappriopriate 83.7.171.184 (talk) 23:37, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: link to TCA
Talk:DuPre Excelsior Mill

message: I don't think this was a Mellow Mushroom; I remember it being an independent pizzeria with a movie theater.  Can't find a source to back this up yet, but if anyone else remembers that can make the correction, I welcome your input. Hzoi 14:20, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Answered my own question: first Mellow Mushroom opened up on Spring Street and is still there.  This was an independent pizzeria at the mill.  Hzoi 18:04, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I do not know where you could find the information, but there was, at least at one time, an old Mellow Mushroom sign out by the back entrance. --Ars Sycro (talk) 01:54, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

text: My mother, who regularly attended the club in the 80's and 90's, has mentioned a Mellow Mushroom previously being located in Heaven to me several times, but I don't know anything else about it or where you could find an article on it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 63.3.71.10 (talk) 02:07, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Former Mellow Mushroom? 

message: I really want to go to a concert at the Masquerade this coming April, but I've heard it's kind of seedy. Confirm/ deny? 74.160.40.239 (talk) 12:00, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sketch?
Talk:Gravelle foster child abuse cases

message: http://fox8.com/2014/03/03/caged-kids-reach-2-million-settlement-with-stark-county-insurers/ Hard to follow, and may not be notable enough. Yes? No? Mapsax (talk) 17:23, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should this be included? 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved.  – robertsky (talk) 03:58, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Michael and Sharen Gravelle →  – As I noted in the AfD, there is a notable thing to be covered here: the child abuse cases relating to the abused by Michael and Sharen Gravelle. The two individuals themselves played a large part in the cases, and court proceedings from the pre-2003 abuses appears to have spanned both the criminal trial as well as a civil case. This foster child abuse case led to legislative change, and I think it's easily got WP:LASTING notability as such.
The current article is a pseudo-BLP; its title purports to be about two criminals, but the article itself is really about the crimes. Changing the title to reflect that this is about the abuse would be an improvement over the current state. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:34, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Biography has been notified of this discussion. UtherSRG (talk) 11:57, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography has been notified of this discussion. UtherSRG (talk) 11:57, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Ohio has been notified of this discussion. UtherSRG (talk) 11:57, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

text: Support. PARAKANYAA (talk) 12:53, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 19 February 2024
Talk:Guilford, Connecticut

message: I would like to see a more comprehensive history section and possibly some better list of institutions, including churches, perhaps.  However, I'm not sure about the wiffleball link! Albany45 14:31, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. As historic as Guilford is, it should certainly have a comprehensive history section. I will try to start a history section when I have a moment. Regards,MarmadukePercy (talk) 06:17, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

text: Faulkner's is not one of Guilford's islands. MarmadukePercy (talk) 03:12, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps not, but a good photo of Faulkner's would be a more appropriate choice than Green Island.  We need a better photo of inland Guilford, too. --Albany45 (talk) 19:55, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments