lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ingush language

message: I am certainly not a specialist, but other articles in Wikipedia (like Languages of the Caucasus) mention that Ingush is part of the North Central Caucasian languages, while the article mention it is part of the Northeast Caucasian languages. Maybe a specialist could resolve this. Thanks. olivier 09:13, Jun 25, 2004 (UTC)
:SIL says North Central and as far as the Internet goes they're the most specialized source. Wikiacc 21:40, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)

message: I thought Ingush was supposed to be a Cyrillic-written dialect of English, but I was wrong.
--68.103.31.159 (talk) 22:17, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: 68.103.31.159 You are searching in the wrong place. Search for Гацх Суяїлліс. 2A00:23C7:5882:8201:51A6:2C8D:2DAC:5403 (talk) 06:35, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Random crap 

message: The section concerning the Ingush alphabet is insufficient. The spelling (IPA) of the letters may divert from the Russian spelling.--Sae1962 (talk) 09:06, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ingush alphabet
Talk:Federal subjects of Russia

message: A discussion on a closely related topic may interest watchers of this page at Talk:Republics of Russia. There is a discussion as to whether a calculated total including the view of the Kremlin on the Donetsk and Luhansk regions of Ukraine should be included in the infobox and opening. Cambial — foliar❧ 11:03, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regions of Ukraine in infoboxes on Russia
Talk:Siegfried Alkan

message: I removed this paragraph from the article:
An interesting anecdote about Alkan's death: Supposedly he was reaching for his Torah on his bookshelf when it collapsed on top of him, killing him instantly.
This anecdote is about Charles-Valentin Alkan. Furthermore it is by many considered a myth. If anyone wants to write a couple of paragraphs about it in the correct article, do a Google Groups search for alkan bookshelf OR bookcase and you'll have plenty of research material.
Pladask 11:04, 25 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong Alkan
Talk:Charles-Valentin Alkan

message: Removed post-humous speculation from a source that shouldn't be in a Featured article:   (noting that the source is still used once in the article). SandyGeorgia (Talk)  14:19, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: That edit also removed a sentence that was supported by a second citation, Conway (2012), pp. 234–235. Was that intended or bycatch? As to marking S. McCallum as an unreliable source: that citation – McCallum (2007), 8, and n. 11. – consists of a quotation from Ronald Smith's Alkan: The Enigma (1976) and an editor's note, IOW not her voice. I suggest once this has been clarified in the citation,  is unwarranted. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 14:48, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Re-checking now ... SandyGeorgia (Talk)  14:50, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

text: Re. Smith: He doesn't mention kashrut in the quotation; it's the editors "possible explanation'. I haven't worked out who that editor is. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 15:44, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Post RfC

message: Basis of RfC: to determine appropriateness of material in article provided by User:Chip-chip-2020. Smerus (talk) 09:46, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The RfC statement is decidedly non-neutral, and at over 5,500 bytes, is a long way from being brief. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 13:01, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It cannot be brief because of the need to place the quote selected by Cc2020 in its full context. Best, --Smerus (talk) 15:34, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Did you read the paragraph beginning ? --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 15:41, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  Fair enough - I have rewritten the beginning so as to clearly separate (I hope) the issue from my comments.  I don't alas understand your quote - which paragraph are you referring to? Best, --Smerus (talk) 15:51, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: If you follow the link that I provided (either WP:RFCNEUTRAL or WP:RFCBRIEF, they go to the same place) it's the last paragraph of the section. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 16:30, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. --Smerus (talk) 17:36, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfC: Alkan and Masarnau
Talk:Breach of contract

message: Whoa.  There is content here that constitutes legal opinion instead of fact.  This needs substantial editing.  The red vs. blue pipes is an example.  I'll make a little edit for now, but this page needs clean-up.   Uberveritas (talk) 05:31, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It's not clear here which system is being discussed. I get the impression it's US, which is fine but it needs to be explicit. I don't know if and to what extent these descriptions (minor/material/fundamental/anticipatory) apply to UK law, or indeed laws of european countries, or indeed around all nations.
78.149.179.13 (talk) 19:14, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Country of applicability? 

message: Hi,Untold unsure about the luxury car insurance never added the car into the will of the heir and two parties in court to know who is the owner of this moving car , So I think the ruling Government is the owner of heir as let the car establishedment and import and export that car in documentary for itself not any of private or organisation or individuals or community in that country. MK slogans remains the ANC movement and it mark hudge impact to geopolitical institutions.The ANC BORN AGAIN Its Military never expelled from becoming the defence force of the South African Country since 1994 and before 1994 and Nelson Mandela played it wisely and we all adapt to that into the futures.Amooketsi on the way to win international law portal breaking news author and actors newsmakers .  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.113.228.89 (talk) 17:23, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Competition of Contract
Talk:Give Us a Clue

message: Removed the following.
:The most highly skilled of all was Lionel Blair. I can still remember how the tears of frustration welled up in his eyes during their Italian tour at not being allowed the use of his mouth to finish off two gentlemen of Verona.
Not only is this already on BJAODN anyway, but it appears to derive from the BBC Radio 4 comedy series "I'm Sorry I Haven't A Clue" where Blair's alleged antics are a running joke, so is probably a copyright violation as well.
Bonalaw 11:50, 25 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: With regard to my recent revert, the convention of lower case within titles for articles and prepositions is also observed within British English. For examples, see I'm Sorry I Haven't a Clue, Just a Minute, Have I Got News for You, etc. Chris 42 17:37, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move
Talk:House of Kinsky

message: According to MOS:INFOBOXFLAG, flag icons may not be useful in infoboxes: 
* Generally, flag icons should not be used in infoboxes, even when there is a "country", "nationality" or equivalent field: they are unnecessarily distracting and give undue prominence to one field among many.  
Therefore, I propose that the flag icons in the infobox be removed. -- Blairall (talk) 02:22, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of flag icons in infobox
Talk:Green (R.E.M. album)

message: I guess the personnel section on the wiki page is a copy/paste from liner notes, so perhaps the pianist is not credited. A quick google doesn't provide the info either Dhalamh (talk) 15:26, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who played the piano on "World Leader Pretend"?
Talk:Dead Letter Office (album)

message: I removed the words legendary and rare from the line describing Chronic Town since it's neither.
70.88.213.74 (talk) 18:33, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Chronic Town

message: I believe the quote is actually "I'm a man of men, by no means", which fits the satire in this version of the song.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.144.151.193 (talk) 23:45, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: King of the Road
Talk:Left Party (Sweden)

message: Does this article really need so many maintenance templates everywhere? Pretty much every section of it has either "Refimprove", "Unreferenced" or "Expand section", and the one on the lead is not even correct (the article has footnotes, plenty of them). I doubt most of them are even needed at this point, and even if they are, it would be better to have them as a unified "Refimprove" at the top. Geolodus (talk) 08:06, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:Tag bombing|Tag bombing]]?

message: As of yesterday (February 16th), the Left Party has officially voted to end the policy of seeking to leave the EU:
https://www.thelocal.se/20190217/swedens-left-party-drops-swexit-policy Culloty82 (talk) 16:56, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I think it's an exaggeration to say that they aren't eurosceptics anymore, but they do move towards a softer euroscepticism.Sjö (talk) 17:01, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  No longer Eurosceptic 

message: Doesn't seem to meet notability on it's own. Could be written into the 2000s section on the Left Party article alongside sv:Vägval Vänster. AlexandraAVX (talk) 18:54, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Support. I would agree that the article should be merged since it fails notability guildlines.`~HelpingWorld~` (👽🛸) 15:46, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

text: Support as the event is notable unlike the organization on its own. ~ lovkal (talk) 11:49, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

text: Done - UtherSRG (talk) 17:35, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Left Democrats (Sweden)]] into [[Left Party (Sweden)]] 

message: The Left Party about to have a congress, and the party leadership has proposed to drop all references to captitalism and socialism. If this goes though, wouldn't it be appropriate to remove socialism from the infobox and replace it with left-wing populism, as well as changing political position from Left-wing to centre-left to left wing? 37.247.3.22 (talk) 14:22, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ideology
Talk:Multiplexing

message: I made a small grammatical correction. --86.133.50.57 01:55, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Jan Girke 22:07, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have tried to address this issue in the introduction. Mange01 19:09, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  What Is Muxing Used For? (Explanation For Common People Required) 

message: This article is going to need a better introduction if it is to cover the non-electrical definitions of multiplexing.  There is even a form of DNA science which involves a method called multiplexing!
64.13.11.134 09:44, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There are roads with fractional numbers? Crazy Brits. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 87.162.30.226 (talk) 09:17, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broad range of definitions 

message: Is CDMA another basic form of multiplexing apart from TDM and FDM? Zuxy 09:47, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well CDMA is multiple-access rather than multiplexing. But the corresponding multiplexing technique is called code-division multiplexing (CDM), today forwarded to the CDMA article, but perhaps it should be forwarded to spread spectrum instead? Mange01 (talk) 18:04, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  CDMA 

message: This page could use a table of contents. That's all I'm sayin'. --74.62.116.35 (talk) 11:02, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Table of Contents 

message: bookslike  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.226.191.108 (talk) 07:27, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  bookslike 

message: This article is currently only about physical layer multiplexing. 
The TCP/IP model transport layer and the OSI model session layer also provides multiplexing, by dividing the data into segments, adding a port number. On the receiver side, the Network socket software provides demultiplexing.
As pointed out above, Virual LANs and IEEE802.11q provides multiplexing at the data link layer. 
How and where should this be discussed? Mange01 (talk) 14:17, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Higher layer multiplexing 

message: What does "chip times" in the Code-division multiplexing section mean? 204.210.242.157 (talk) 21:22, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "chip times" in Code-division multiplexing 

message: I don't think this would be too controversial, though I'm starting a discussion to make sure. The subject that is listed in Multiplex (TV) seems to be the same subject mentioned in Multiplexing. Most of what is in Multiplex (TV) could be added to the "Digital broadcasting" section of Multicasting. Steel1943 (talk) 02:18, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Stove

message: I am no expert on stoves but im pretty sure something is not a component of a stove. Maybe the components section should be removed entirely since there is a huge difference between how a gas stove works versus an electric stove Mopeyduke (talk) 18:41, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change components to include the actual components of a stove, instead of "something" 

message: This article includes references to:
# The earliest recorded stove was created in Alsace, France in 1490.
# The Ancient Egyptian, Jewish and Roman people used stone and brick ovens, fueled with wood.
# In 1735, the Castrol stove, or "stew stove"... was the earliest recorded wood-burning stove.
# The first wood-burning stove was patented in Strasbourg in 1557.
These cannot all be simultaneously true.
Electricat (talk) 13:55, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Invention of the stove
Talk:Reveal (R.E.M. album)

message: I'm currently working on the article in my sandbox. The current version of the article already has citations in the album infobox next to the release date for each single. This source is a PDF scan of an issue of ARIA listing singles that were to come out that week (in this example, "Imitation of Life", which it says came out on April 16, 2001). However, in one of the band's biographies, Perfect Circle by Tony Fletcher, lists the release date for this single as April 30. Which source should take precedence? I imagine the ARIA chart might since it was from the time that the single came out, and I guess that means it’s much less likely that someone misremembered the proper date. But maybe the biography is referring to the US release date? Thoughts? Elephantranges (talk) 01:33, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which source takes precedence?
Talk:Pendleton Civil Service Reform Act

message: ekh 02:57, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

message: this is unfair to Charles Guiteau.    —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.171.128.211 (talk) 05:53, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: What do you expect. He was a deranged office seeker who killed a US President. :) Nonamer98 (talk) 16:08, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disappointed office seeker 

message: Looks like the main text of this article
was taken from 
http://usinfo.state.gov/usa/infousa/facts/democrac/28.htm
:Yes, it does. In the main page, it shows copyright information, but I'm not sure if it has to do with the particular article used in the main text, or not.--ViolinGirl 15:44, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copied from government webpage 

message: Can't the "This article needs to be wikified" be removed. I'm new so I'm not sure. -Barry- 08:17, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Not yet. The article needs to be split into sections in order to be wikified. It also needs more in-depth information. Nonamer98 (talk) 16:10, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  It's wikified, isn't it? 

message: Should American Civil Service redirect to this page? It currently does yet this is hardly an encyclopedia entry for the American Civil Service. 
--Apolloourson 15:34, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  American Civil Service 

message: Should the Merit System page link to this page? The topics are very interrelated and the merit system page only has about three sentences? Also, one other thing to consider is that the Pendleton Act also gave the option for people to enter into government work through lateral entry rather than starting on the bottom tier of government work. (http://web.jjay.cuny.edu/~jlpeters/html/chapter_6.html)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smile234 (talk • contribs) 19:00, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merit System

message: The article currently says: "As a result of the court case Luévano v. Campbell, most federal government employees are no longer hired by means of competitive examinations." I don't believe this is true. That case (see the link) was not about, and did not void, the use of "competitive examinations" generally, but about a particular exam, which was then replaced. Perhaps someone would clarify that? 50.248.212.110 (talk) 22:30, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The significance of the "Luévano v. Campbell" case.
Talk:Dumpster diving

message: The Canadian Trespass to Property Act does not date "back to the British North America Act of 1867". That is an illogical connection, and factually wrong. The Act has nothing to do with the British North America Act of 1867, and would be a provincial not a national law.203.80.61.102 (talk) 04:09, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canadian Act 

message: This article was the subject of an educational assignment at Mount Allison University supported by WikiProject Anthropology and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2012 Q1 term. Further details are available on the course page. 
Category:Wikipedia Ambassador Program student projects, 2012 Q1
:Nice.
:So, what are the citations needed, again? 2600:8803:7F09:100:C9C8:9576:BC19:8747 (talk) 00:45, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment 

message: {refimprove|section|date=May 2023}}
 
 
The main purpose of a dumpster is to store garbage until it is emptied by a garbage truck and disposed of. Dumpsters can be used for all kinds of waste, or for recycling purposes. Most dumpsters are emptied weekly by a hired garbage removal service.
The main purpose of a dumpster is to store garbage until it is emptied by a garbage truck and disposed of. Dumpsters can be used for all kinds of waste, or for recycling purposes. Most dumpsters are emptied weekly by a hired garbage removal service  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Louis1001 (talk • contribs) 02:20, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dumpster  

message: — Assignment last updated by Trexler369 (talk) 23:48, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: INQ 120 What a Waste
Talk:Paulo Coelho

message: , the sentence I added says he was an anarchist and protested the government. The next sentence is about how the government treated him. How are they the same? czar 22:40, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: You made your edit on the strength of a not particularly informed remark made in some backwoods US publication. In the sentence that follows in the article one is given Coelho's own account of what happened: that he identified himself with left-wing thinking so prominently that he was picked up by government agents. If he didn't say there that he was an Anarchist, then by Wikipedia guidelines on trustworthy sources, you can take the other account as some garbled and unreliable misinterpretation. Sweetpool50 (talk) 00:02, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anarchist 

message: The table in the Bibliography section says that Aleph came out in 2010, but Aleph's page says it came out in 2011.  Which is true? Thunderhawk256 (talk) 13:23, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Aleph was released in Brazil, in portuguese, in July 2010. Source (news article in major brazilian news site, in portuguese): . At the time it was scheduled to be released in international markets (including Portugal, so it was not a matter of translation time) in 2011. The Aleph article infobox mentions the English version published by Harper Collins, for which 2011 is probably correct. I don't know whether the date in the lead of that article should remain 2011 or be changed to reflect the original release and conflict with the infobox. Fbergo (talk) 14:13, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aleph Date Discrepancy 

message: The paragraph starting with this sentence reads like a petty attack by a rival rather than a neutral statement of facts. Is there anything in this paragraph that we should keep? Uhoj (talk) 12:44, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: A cardinal rule on Wikipedia is that statements should be supported by a reliable source. You have just deleted a para supported by four sources because you do not like the sound of it. I have reversed you and will report your conduct to adminsitrators if you persist. Sweetpool50 (talk) 16:49, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  However, reactions to his writing have not been without dissension.
Talk:The Beastmaster

message: On the DVD, the director and producer discuss the film as having a $3.5 million to $4 million budget, not a $9 million one.
December 8, 2005:  Ok, we have a problem here.  The Graham Bond link goes to a Wikki article about the founder of British R&B who died in 1974.  Clearly this is not the same person as the actor who played the Ancient One in the 1999 to 2002 Beastmaster series.  How do we fix this?--GestaltG
:I've replaced the link by a new one to a new page Grahame Bond (actor), that you can edit if there are info you have on this actor. Lvr 10:32, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "and the series was noted for its beautiful natural scenery, its animal cast, inovative photography, attention to archeological detail, excellent character writing and acting, and its plethora of beautiful women" --unsigned
:As long as that has a reference, it would not be NPOV because it is stating it as someone's opinion, not stating it as fact. -- trlkly 16:17, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: This article needs some wikifying! 71.250.74.47 17:22, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Be bold, log in, and do it ;-) Lvr 21:24, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Meh, even the "log in" part is optional. You can stay an IP if you want. -- trlkly 16:18, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikifying 

message: I remember tracking the title down for this, and it's correct. The BeastMaster article title is not; BeastMaster was the name of the TV series, really honest. 355698 05:25, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No need to merge, I saw it. It's probably a shoe-in for "speedy deletion". The page is refering to the movie which has a page. I'll place the appropriate tag. Bignole 05:29, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: «Deleted BetaBot's message», since Image:The beastmaster.jpg has been deleted. -- trlkly 16:20, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:The beastmaster.jpg

message: I actually came to this page because I read (on another wiki) that this movie is a notable example of a PG rated movie that shows complete frontal nudity. I'd that information myself, if I had a verifiable source. If anyone can find one, please include this information. -- trlkly 16:23, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nudity 

message: If Demi Moore wasn't even in the movie, it's even less relevant than 'trivia' implies to mention that she met several times with the director. One can have some minor amusement speculating what might have gone on during those meetings, but I'm going to delete that statement. Centrepull (talk) 16:22, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia 

message: The tiger they used died from the toxic black dye they used on it, that's why the tiger in the sequel is normal colored.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.160.123.254 (talk) 12:33, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: The Tiger.