lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Greek love

message: __TOC__
== I take back all comments here ==
Let this be whatever anyone wants as I could care less now.--Amadscientist (talk) 02:47, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Go for it. I am tired of dealing with this mess of POV.--Amadscientist (talk) 07:48, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh...I think I can help with this.--Amadscientist (talk) 06:56, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: A good portion of this can go to Neoclassicism.--Amadscientist (talk) 06:56, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

text: Any merging of content must have a linkback in the edit summary to the article content originates from when placing in the new article! This is a minimum requirement. Please do not merge content on the Warren Cup. I dispute this information. Almost all of it. I have detailed my concerns in the history but the article was returned to this version out of frustration. It clearly has only silent consenus for this version, no different than the other version before it.--Amadscientist (talk) 06:56, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

text: Agreed, as long as the material didn't already originate from that article. A few editors had been doing cross over work on those and a few other articles.--Amadscientist (talk) 06:56, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

text: You need not do this. Merging of content does not require a consensus or a deletion but a simple redirect. It can be done with a bold edit or a merge proposal can be made for a more solid consensus to keep it redirected. It's already been moved but moved back for more discussion.--Amadscientist (talk) 06:56, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

text: By giving notice to the projects, especiall Classical greece and rome, you should get a reaction.--Amadscientist (talk) 06:56, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

text: Overall I would be cautious about what you merge. this article has so much POV that it could seriously upset some editors to introduce this content. I would suggest an explanation after and merging of content. I also highly recommend you familiarize yourself with the merging process at WP:WPMERGE.--Amadscientist (talk) 06:56, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

text: merging with Romanticism is a very bad idea. No historian of Romanticism gives one tenth that much attention to Byron & this topic. Rjensen (talk) 07:04, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

text: *Support future merging of the current edit with Pederasty in ancient Greece'Greek love' concerns the reception of ancient Greek pederasty and it should therefore be the end section of the other article. However the other article is now in worse shape than this one and I don't think there is a general willingness to improve it. So any attempt to merge seems premature for the moment. Oh and I was User:McOoee previously. Now I am Sir Gawain McGarson (talk) 11:38, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

message: I found that the mixture of citation styles has led to excessive unnecessary duplication in references, while the bibliography list is incomplete. I'm proposing use of the ref name system for multiple citations, with inline page numbers, and have made a start on this. However, there's a lot of work to go. Please either help out or bear with me! Bjenks (talk) 05:54, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mode of citations
Talk:Hitchcock, Oklahoma

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.okhistory.org/publications/enc/entry.php?entry=HI019. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:01, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Jacobi identity

message: In my browser (Firefox 1.5), the first occurrence of \operatorname{ad} in this article appears literally (as \operatorname{ad}), whereas the others appear correctly.  Is this just a problem with my browser (or maybe a timeout while waiting for the content to render?), or do other people experience it too?
:That's my comment above, I just forgot to sign it.  When I view this from home (using the same browser -- in fact, the same profile), \operatorname{ad} appears correctly, so it must've just been my connection speed.  JadeNB 04:16, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  <code><nowiki><math>\operatorname{ad}</math></nowiki></code>
Template talk:RD Archive header

message: FYI If this template copied the exact date math from Template:Reference desk navigation it's going to be subject to the same currentyear glitch as the older template--172.166.213.97 21:09, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Bug

message: The header will now point to the current desk when it determines that there is no existing archive page newer than itself. This is because when editing live transclusion pages, you could only move foward to 2 days before the current date. Now you can move forward to the current date.  freshofftheufoΓΛĿЌ  01:32, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transclusion 

message: I'm going to change the code of the NextMonth template to this:

and after that I'll do the same to the tomorrow templates as a fix to the problem when the year changes.
I'm pretty sure the code is sound, but I have a reputation for making silly coding mistakes so can someone just confirm that it's OK? The pseudo code would look like this:
if CURRENTMONTH is 1
 print calculateDate(month) + " " + CURRENTYEAR
else
 print calculateDate(month and year)
end if
This way, if the bot calculates NextMonth for January in December (it shouldn't), the #time function will automatically roll over to the next year (normal), and if it calculates NextMonth for January in January (it passes "December" as a parameter, so this is possible, and the bot should be doing this at 0:00), the year will default to CURRENTYEAR and won't roll over (added). I'm tired, I should only be attempting this with a clear head.  freshofftheufoΓΛĿЌ  08:57, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Bug fix

message: Sorry I kind of disappeared there without finishing off the fix before the new year. I still don't plan on being active for a while, but I just wanted to say thanks to VP and Martin and all for fixing up that mess that I really should have averted long ago. Later dudes.  freshofftheufoΓΛĿЌ  04:23, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Bug Fix 

message: Unless there are objections, I intend to rename this template to RD Archive header (and for the monthly header also). --Steve Summit (talk) 13:55, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename
Talk:201 (number)

message: Not sure why this redirects to 200 (number).  I can make this into a stub.  Notary137 21:17, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Upon further review, it will stay a redirect.  There is information in 201 (number) that warrants it (for now).  Notary137 21:22, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect? 

message: The binary value of 201 shows as 001(subscript-2), the ternary value shows as 10(subscript-3), etc. These are wrong, as are the various other values below these.
The binary value should be 11001001, for example.
I looks to me like the html generator, when reading the "201" value, converts it incorrectly.
I'm using a recent version of Google Chrome.
Dr Smith (talk) 19:08, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  broken values in generated number box
Talk:Jerry Haynes

message: Dudes! A wonderful start. Could there be more work on Mr. Peppermint? This needs to be the best it possibly can be! Can we get another assessment? A little mollusk (talk) 04:26, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Richard Lathe

message: Editors should be aware that there was a sensationalist newspaper article on Lathe published in 2002.  This was later retracted due to a paucity of facts but not before being syndicated to a number of other publications.  Please exercise due caution. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 23:43, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cautionary note

message: As far as requests to re-word information, this needs to be done by the requesting editor in the form of "Change x to y using z". This should include the verbatim text from whichever part of the prose which the affected citation being changed covers.
 
	A verbatim description of the old text to be removed from the article (if any)
	A verbatim description of the new text to be added to the article (if any)
	A reference which verifies the requested change
Please change:
*The Sun's diameter is 25 miles.
to read as:
*The Sun's diameter is 864,337 miles.
using as a reference:
* 
As Wikipedia is a volunteer project, requests such as these are generally expected to be structured in this manner. FYI.
Regards,  Spintendo  19:50, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Reply 18-MAY-2019

message: Some of the external links in the bottom of the article are broken (e.g. the ones linking to New Scientist, the ones linking to Times). Please can someone have a look at those links and have them fixed. I gave it a quick try to edit, but, I do not want to link incorrectly. Thanks Ktin (talk) 03:59, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  External References - Broken Links
Talk:Johnny Basil

message: Moved as uncontroversial Duja 07:17, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 
Talk:Nicola da Urbino

message: A search reveals an article on this guy from Brittanica, but as I have no access I have no way of accessing the article - if somebody could, and would incorporate it into this, I'd be most grateful. --AlbertHerring 21:26, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like we may have the right facts but the wrong name, that this article is about Nicola da Urbino, and that Pellipario was the progenitor from Caste Durante of the Fontanas. But I can't get hold of the Negroni article that is essential. So I tagged my own edits! --Wetman 22:48, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Castel Durante is the old name of the town of Urbania, that is in the Province of Pesaro and Urbino, in the region Marche. At the time the town was in the Duchy of Urbino, but NEVER in Umbria. --193.205.129.164 09:27, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marche not Umbria
Talk:WrestleMania VII

message: He did NOT have Andre the Giant as his manager,so please stop posting that he was.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.86.226.18 (talk) 07:08, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Big Boss Man
Talk:Robust regression

message: Some of the sections of this article appear to be plagiarised e.g. the section "History and unpopularity of robust regression" has been copied and pasted from "Predictive Modeling and Analytics" By Jeffrey Strickland Vardasnejonas (talk) 15:06, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

message: I don't think they should be merged. The only real connection I see is that the errors-in-variables model page uses the word "Robust" in one of its headings. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tolstoy the Little Black Cat (talk • contribs) 12:47, March 14, 2007
:I agree - it certainly shouldn't be merged. Also, the original errors in variables page really needs to be greatly expanded. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.251.0.7 (talk • contribs) 05:15, April 17, 2007
::I agree that a merge would be a very bad idea.  Baccyak4H (Yak!) 14:41, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I removed both tags, since the consensus is against it.  --GargoyleMT 13:17, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with Errors in variables model 

message: As often the critics is bound to nothing but averaging. Is that the path to excellence? You could well replace the 'jargon' and the 'citation' tagsas well as the merger proposal with a 'stupidity' tag. Please contribute or stay out. Wireless friend (talk) 07:43, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nuisance to criticize without capability to improve 

message: States that least squares "clearly" marks some interesting points as outliers, but I don't agree.  Could this text be clarified?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nixphoeni (talk • contribs) 17:44, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outlier detection 

message: The "Book by Rousseeuw Leroy" text where the "vague" marker has been placed could be Rousseeuw and Annick M. Leroy, "Robust Regression & Outlier Detection" (1987) as in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_set#Classic_data_sets
194.94.136.34 (talk) 12:48, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vague marker
Talk:Orange Blossom Trail

message: I've lived two blocks away from OBT for two years now. I've pretty much been able to delineate the unofficial red-light district based on where the strip clubs and hookers hang out. Most of the area is blighted economically compared to the rest of the city: a number of stores have failed recently. Cwolfsheep (talk) 04:30, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrote article
Talk:Principal Pixiefrog

message: I redirected this article because this is the same info from List of characters from My Gym Partner's a Monkey. There's no need to make an article about this character because the article has plenty of room for it. Also, I see that the info wasn't copied well (capitalization errors, etc.) and that there were no spaces between some of the words.Squirepants101 21:50, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirected
Talk:Ventura County Line

message: I was curious as to why a user put the importance tag on this article.  I added a reference which confirms the notability, but I've never seen this tag on a commuter line in a major metropolitan area and didn't think it was necessary.  It could use some clean-up, though. --Marriedtofilm 21:55, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Everard Green

message: Supposedly there is further information available within ...
* Who Was Who in Literature, 1906-1934. Based on entries that first appeared in Literary Yearbook (1906-1913), Literary Yearbook and Author's Who's Who (1914-1917), Literary Yearbook (1920-1922), and Who's Who in Literature (1924-1934). -- billinghurst (talk) 16:09, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Terra

message: The claim that 'Terra' is 'the standard used to mark Earth on language-independent starmaps' not only has no reference cited, it's also patently absurd. To the best of my knowledge there is no such thing as a 'language-independent starmap' in the first place (a Google search for that term turns up virtually nothing but this very page, and other pages that quote from it), and a STARmap wouldn't show the planets of our solar system anyway. I propose removing this line. FireHorse (talk) 14:15, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 'Language-independent starmaps?'

message: *The entry about the use of terra in science fiction is obviously not approriate for a disambiguation page (see Wikipedia:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages)), but it contains useful information. I will eventually reduce the entry to a one-line description, but I'd like to give notice here beforehand.  Terra (science fiction) could be created fairly quickly and could probably be cited fairly easily if someone wants to take a crack at it.--Hraefen Talk 22:17, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Terra (science fiction)]]

message: Rather than continue the edit war, I propose letting the link to KH stand, since the Terra character is notable enough to be mentioned in List of Kingdom Hearts characters. --Scaletail 20:49, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Kingdom Hearts
File talk:Bristol Premier Combination Football Logo.jpg

message: I have changed the licensing logo of this image to a more accurate tag. The  more clearly defines the genre of this image than just the tag . This also improves the categorization of this image considerably as there are amny different types of logos relating to different fields of encyclopedic content. The category of this image is further classified as belonging to :Category:Football logos. --Siva1979Talk to me 22:21, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Reason for change
File talk:Essex Olympian Football League (crest).jpg

message: I have changed the licensing logo of this image to a more accurate tag. The  more clearly defines the genre of this image than just the tag . This also improves the categorization of this image considerably as there are amny different types of logos relating to different fields of encyclopedic content. The category of this image is further classified as belonging to :Category:Football logos. --Siva1979Talk to me 22:23, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Reason for change
File talk:Ecfl.jpg

message: I have changed the licensing logo of this image to a more accurate tag. The  more clearly defines the genre of this image than just the tag . This also improves the categorization of this image considerably as there are amny different types of logos relating to different fields of encyclopedic content. The category of this image is further classified as belonging to :Category:Football logos. --Siva1979Talk to me 22:26, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Reason for change
Talk:Neustar

message: I added additional sources to the page and edited the section about their former registry services, as that has now been purchased by GoDaddy. I've updated the section about the acquisition to bring it up to present tense. I've removed the "Needs Copyedit" tag as well. Pizzarush (talk) 01:17, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits, including GoDaddy Acquisition of Registry Services 

message: I propose that Neustar IP Intelligence be merged into Neustar. The subsidiary does not appear to be notable independent of its parent company, so it does not warrant a stand alone article. Searches of the usual Google types, HighBeam, and EBSCO found only information from the company, press releases, a blog, a "sponsored post", and brief mentions in a few lists of commercial geolocation databases such as in this book. The content of the subsidiary article can easily be explained in the context of the parent, and doing so will not create problems of size or undue weight. Worldbruce (talk) 07:19, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, seems like a good idea. Ditto for DNS Advantage, although that might just be deleted.  Thanks for any  thoughts. W Nowicki (talk) 17:06, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

text: Oppose - The Neustar article seems fairly big. Probably best to keep them separate. 16:56, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

text: Mergers of both units to Neustar completed. Kbrose (talk) 01:05, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: Propose to update the Neustar logo to the current brand. Logo is appearing (incorrectly) Internet-wide when sourced from the wikipedia page.
Correct logo can be found at: <ref> https://ns-cdn.neustar.biz/creative_services/biz/neustar/www/base/img/hp/ns-logo.png 
Logo use can be seen at: <ref> https://www.neustar.biz/resources/corporate/about-neustar-fact-sheet.pdf 
Thank you community!
````breed
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.79.170.250 (talk) 14:37, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo 

message: The paragraph on Rodney L. Joffe seems to have two problems. (1.) It  unbalances the section, but more importantly (2.) appears to violate Wikipedia:Neutral point of view policy. For example, it makes statements like "discredited Trump-Russia collusion investigation" linking only the counter-narrative. The cited sources are biased, especially RealClearInvestigations. In  November 2020, The New York Times reported that "Real Clear became one of the most prominent platforms for elevating unverified and reckless stories about the president's political opponents, through a mix of its own content and articles from across conservative media." .  I have corrected the "discredited" sentence, but the problem remains, and needs more attention. --Bejnar (talk) 15:32, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rodney L. Joffe
Talk:Awbare (woreda)

message: This page is a victim of repeated vandalism. Please give it protection. It really needs it.
Thank you
MustafaO (talk) 02:12, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request to protect this page from repeated vandalism
Talk:Colm O'Rourke

message: In one part of the article it is stated that Colm was born in Aughavas.Co. Leitrim......later on it is stated that he was born in Edgeworthstown Co. Longford. Both of these cannot be true so which is the correct one? 51.37.255.107 (talk) 23:26, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: As per source it appears to be Leitrim is his birth place. Updated article to reflect this. Dubarr18 (talk) 06:36, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Born in Edgeworthstown or Aughavas...which is it?