lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Azadi Square

message: Wouldn't "Shahyaad" be spelled شاھیاد not what is currently, written: شھیاد ? I am no expert in Persian just wondering. MirzaGhalib 06:53, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: شه and شاه are the same in Persian. 4nn1l2 (talk) 07:12, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

message: The major content of the Design and Architecture section is an extensive "quote" that was obtained from a source written in Persian. It seems the translation's quality should and could be improved. The way it reads, the quote might have come from an interview (I can't say this for certain) and due to this source, the narrative contains an ad hoc "stream of consciousness" content. Due to this, the quote's content is not the quality required for an encyclopedia article.  
I am not an expert in how translations are done; however, it seems logical that the translation should be rendered in standard grammatically correct English. 
Also, the article could be better served if the large amount of quoted material would be revised. The quote runs three paragraphs, and besides being presented in poor grammar, it lacks presentation organization. Some of the quoted information could be retained as quotes, but there is much information that could be written outside the quotes in a better structure so that it could be more accessible to a reader (and although "outside" of a quote, this material could be referenced to the original sources).
As the majority of this article is sourced from two articles written in Persian. It would be good to find other reference sources written in English or French or another language. More references could provide additional information to improve the article. Osomite 🐻 (hablemos) 17:19, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quality of Persian to English translation in the Design and Architecture section
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Graving

message: As Rklawton notes on this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Graving -- "graving" is indeed a neologism.  It could also be considered jargon, as it is peculiar to a particular group.  Self-described "gravers" use "graving" as a descriptive term for their varied activities, as described in the article.  In my opinion, the page should not be deleted just because the term doesn't yet have widespread usage.  It is thus far a relatively new hobby limited to those interested in cemeteries and GENEALOGY.  Many gravers have been contacted by people who were pleased to discover burial information on deceased relatives that has been placed on the internet.  This is a valuable genealogical tool, and certainly genealogy is not a page that would be considered for deletion.
countedx58Countedx58 07:10, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What you describe above pretty much amounts to the definition of a neologism - something not permitted here as an article.  If this (unsourced) information is useful to geneology, then it should appear in the geneology article.  Rklawton 14:53, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Delaware Extension

message: Status of the line in CT1000s (and equivalents):
*1884: 7.2 mi, Washington Avenue to Dock Street; 2.1 mi Girard Point Extension
*1900: 7.1 mi; 2.0 mi Girard Point Branch and 1.4 mi Schuylkill River Branch Extension from 1.6 mi along the GP Branch
*1923: 7.1 mi; 2.4 mi Girard Point Branch and 1.4 mi Schuylkill River Branch Extension from 1.9 mi along the GP Branch (same distance from Washington Avenue as in 1900); also 1.9 mi Connection to Schuylkill River Branch Extension returning to the Delaware Extension; 2.7 mi on Delaware Branch between junctions
*1945: 8.9 mi; 0.7 mi Girard Point Branch; 1.8? mi Old Greenwich Yard is the east part of the old line
--NE2 07:11, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Status

message: I have removed incorrect links to Delaware Avenue and Columbus Boulevard, but shown them here for future improvements.--DThomsen8 (talk) 13:23, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delaware Avenue and Columbus Boulevard 
Talk:William Porcher DuBose

message: Based on this individual being included in the Calendar of saints (Episcopal Church in the United States of America), I am adding the :Category:Anglican saints and the Saints WikiProject banner to this article. I am awaiting reliable sources which can be used to add the content to the article. John Carter 19:37, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Saints banner and category

message: What did he have to say that so impressed the British church and offended the American? Fccjr (talk) 14:00, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  What did he have to say? 

message: Please note that the removal of DuBose from the Episcopal Church calendar was on a trial basis and has not yet met final approval. (This will in all probability happen at the next General Convention so his page should get a revamp at that point in time.) https://www.vbinder.net/resolutions/113/finalization?house=HD&lang=en Spartacus007 (talk) 21:59, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trial removal from church calendar 

message: It seems that his white supremacists writings are notable because they have led to his removal from the Episcopal calendar. Perhaps some detail about these writings should be included in the Writings section of the article Karen-bmi30 (talk) 12:58, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  white supremacy in writing section
Talk:Two Prudential Plaza

message: Why didn't they make the spire 85 feet?  :( --Kalmia 07:28, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Spire
Talk:List of rivers of Oklahoma

message: We need to make sure this list is complete.  ProfessorPaul 07:31, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I was gonna ask that. --Mitternacht90 00:55, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Another article for "the Project"
Talk:New Light of Myanmar

message: I incorporated important changes based on Lintner's article: ‘All Lies!’: Myanmar Junta’s Clumsy Propaganda Has a Disturbingly Familiar Ring. I don't know if this is controversial or not, but Wikipedia is for publishing verifiable facts published elsewhere, and that's the case here. The previous version of this wikipedia page claimed that the older New Light of Myanmar was "nationalised in 1969" but there is no reference for that information. The previous version also gave 2 different years for the renaming of the government's newspaper, 1989 and 1993. I left only 1989 but I don't know for sure. --Bmaisonny (talk) 16:23, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bertil Lintner's article in The Irrawady of 16 Aug 2021
Talk:GreenStreet

message: Added list of tenants, added reference section. Went to House Of Blues section and added sentence and reference there. Expect an edit war there soon. :)--Hourick 17:35, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  added list of tenants 

message: http://www.bizjournals.com/mobile/houston/morning_call/2011/03/houston-pavilions-office-tower-gets.html
WhisperToMe (talk) 14:06, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mobile
Talk:Kingston 62

message: This is my first time legitimately creating a Wiki article (without expecting it to be speedy deleted...), so any input would be nice. Thanks! -- Vexion 07:47, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Houston Food Bank

message: I have attempted to remove puffery and advertisement-like material following Template:Advert as best as I could. But I will leave it to others to remove the template or to decide if I removed relevant material. For the authors who have been working on it, please look to other examples of food bank articles, e.g. Greater Boston Food Bank, for examples of what an encyclopedia article on the topic should look like and what information is relevant. Much of the language is best kept for the organization's own webpage, for example talking about "our" programs.BrightVamp (talk) 03:01, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing promotional material
Talk:WWC Universal Heavyweight Championship

message: I Upload some images from the WWC Unversal Championship from the clasic to the actual and a man called Martin H. report them like Copyright Violation when i give the credit for the photo owner 
Still making changes an i will report you OK???
NoelCruz (talk) 15:31, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Images from Universal Heavyweight Championship
Talk:Fuzzy routing

message: The existing external links.
# 36 H Liu, J Li, YQ Zhang, Y Pan:  "An Adaptive Genetic Fuzzy Multi-path Routing Protocol for Wireless Ad Hoc Networks" (2005)
#  8 R Zhang, X Zhu:  "Fuzzy routing in QoS networks" (2005)
# 14 R Zhang, K Long:  "A Fuzzy Routing Mechanism In Next-Generation Networks" (2002)
#  4 KW Wong:  "Fuzzy routing control of service request messages in an individual computing environment" (1995)
# Jason Schwier (These are class notes.)
There are enough reliable sources out there (particularly google books) that notability can be established, but single-digit citation counts don't warrant mention.  Lesser Cartographies (talk) 09:07, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Out of curiosity, where do these numbers come from? ~KvnG 15:24, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Google Scholar.  It has its limitation, but for computer science over the past 20 years the coverage is pretty much exhaustive.  Here are the search results for the first paper.  Lesser Cartographies (talk) 16:16, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation counts
Talk:Stanisław Nogaj

message: I wonder about the tense used in the phrase
"where he had been working at the camp's chancellery" 
Is this correct? It implies he was working at the chancellery before he was sent to the camp.
It would be easy to edit the article and replace those words with
"where he worked at the camp's chancellery"
But maybe I misunderstand. Pavium 08:20, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Wind chime

message: :from the second paragraph: In Japan [chimes] produce pleasant ringing sounds
Do chimes in other countries have some alternative use of which I am unaware?--Vlmastra 03:21, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Umm... 

message: Having to listen to your neighbours wind chimes is psychological torture. 78.151.137.230 (talk) 11:54, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Torture 

message: audio file "Windchimes.ogg" linked in article is actually the sound of thunder, not of a windchime.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.107.66.74 (talk) 15:38, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error Report/Correction Request
Talk:Cosmography

message: Nothing to do with 'cosmos' —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.168.181.63 (talk • contribs) 
The two are completely different topics. I think the person that suggested the merge got cosmology confused with cosmography. Cosmology is the study of the cosmos, while cosmography is completely different. --Адам12901 T/C 01:03, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possibly Merger with [[cosmos]] 

message: *Cosmography, The Third Book, Containing the Geography and History of the Lesser and Greater Asia, and all The Principal Kingdoms, Provinces, Seas, and Isles thereof. Lucian Sunday (talk) 12:29, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Third Book

message: The enigmatic expression "z ~ 1100" and obscure text concerning red-shift needs to be clarified. Since I don't understand it, I can't correct it. David Spector (talk) 13:56, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your comment. I deleted the paragraph. It was not related to the article. Johnjbarton (talk) 20:01, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  z ~ 1100
Talk:CTU: Marine Sharpshooter

message: Major rewrite completed. Need help fill out the infobox. -- Kschang77 08:36, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is Marine Sharpshooter on iOS the same game, at least a related game? RJFJR (talk) 13:17, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: iOS
Talk:Ableton

message: This is an automated message regarding an image used on this page. The image :File:Ableton logo.png, found on :Ableton, has been nominated for deletion because it does not meet Wikipedia image policy. Please see the image description page for more details. If this message was sent in error (that is, the image is not up for deletion, or was left on the wrong talk page), please contact this bot's operator.  STBotI (talk) 15:11, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: An image on this page may be deleted
Talk:Five Variants of Dives and Lazarus

message: Can anyone point to a credible source which substantiates that this piece is correctly titled ..ON... versus what I believe, and do find reference to, ....OF.... that is: Five Variants Of Dives and Lazarus, not Five Variants On Dives and Lazarus. In doing a Google, the only places which "ON" comes up are those places which directly copy the the content of this Wiki article.  With one unfortunate exception, the RVW society pages, correctly lists "OF" in the title in its listings of the works of RVW, but does also elsewhere use "ON" once when referring to it in a non-listing sense. All CD and LP recordings of it I have use "OF" and though I can't put my hand on it at the moment, I believe Kennedy in his book also uses "OF" so I would say ON is off and OF is it and this article should be renamed and the piece's title in the RVW article proper also be renamed. JackME 19:55, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect title of piece, and thus this article 

message: Does this article refer to the tune of Kingsfold? If so, it is valuable to mention that "Dives and Lazarus," "Star of the County Down," " Sing a Song of Bethlehem," "I Heard the Voice of Jesus Say," and "If You Could Hie to Kolob" all use this same tune. Kail Ceannai 08:50, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kingsfold Tune
Talk:Hubble search for transition comets

message: I placed both of these warnings on this page because the article reads like an unpublished journal article and because I was unable to find a journal article on this specific observing program when I performed a title search on "Transition Comets" using the ADS Abstract Service.  (The HST proposal returned by the ADS Abstract search does not count as a journal article.)  The list of participants needs clean-up (as many links point to individuals unassociated with this program), and it almost appears to violate Wikipedia's vanity policies.  (Pages on larger, more important surveys, such as the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, do not provide such membership lists.)  Dr. Submillimeter 08:59, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean-up and original research warnings
Talk:List of active United States naval aircraft

message: The United States Navy does not classify the Osprey as a helicopter and should be moved to either the transport section or under a unique tiltrotor section.  V instead of H in both the tri-service designator and Squadron designator indentify the V-22 as a type of short/vertical takeoff fixed-wing aircraft. Benroethig (talk) 13:05, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: See vehicle type section of this article 1962 United States Tri-Service aircraft designation system Benroethig (talk) 13:10, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  CMV-22B is not a helicopter.
Talk:Emile Paladihle

message: Sadly, I am away from my college library at the moment, and can only go by the limited stuff I find on the internet and by my memory.  In this case, I got the birth and death dates from classicalarchives.com, and the piece that he wrote is one that I've played before.  I think there's an accent on one of the e's in his first name--can anyone verify that? NorthernFalcon 09:14, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:1986 Australian Grand Prix

message: There's significant duplication of information between the opening paragraphs and the Race Summary section. DH85868993 06:10, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplication 
Talk:Faith like Potatoes

message: ==Untitled==
I removed text copied and pasted from the official movie site. The contribution action is appreciated but violates Wikipedia guidelines. Perhaps one can offer a precis of the site or book instead? - Lohanj 09:36, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion 

message: I removed text copied and pasted from the official movie site. The contribution action is appreciated but violates Wikipedia guidelines. Perhaps one can offer a precis of the site or book instead? - Lohanj 09:36, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:High misdemeanor

message: I was confused with the phrase "firing of one's house in a town". At first I thought that it was a typo, and possibly was supposed to be firing of one's [gun] in a town" or something similar. It took a little digging to find Blankstone's whole text:
1. Not only the bare dwelling house, but all out-houses that are parcel thereof, though not contiguous thereto, nor under the same roof, as barns and stables, may be the subject of arson b. And this by the common law: which also accounted it felony to burn a single barn in the field, if filled with hay or. corn, though not parcel of the dwelling house c. The burning of a stack of corn was antiently likewise accounted arson d. And indeed all the niceties and distinctions which we meet with in our books, concerning what shall, or shall not, amount to arson, seem now to be taken away by a variety of statutes; which will be mentioned in the next chapter, and have made the punishment of wilful burning equally extensive as the mischief. The offence of arson (strictly so called) may be committed by wilfully setting fire to one's own house, provided one's neighbour's house is thereby also burnt; but if no mischief is done but to one's own, it does not amount to felony, though the fire was kindled with intent to burn another's e. For by the common law no intention to commit a felony amounts to the same crime: though it does, in some cases, by particular statutes. However such wilful firing one's own house, in a town, is a high misdemesnor, and punishable by fine, imprisonment, pillory, and perpetual sureties for the good behaviour f *. And if a landlord or reversioner sets fire to his own house, of which another is in possession under a lease from himself or from those whose estate he hath, it shall be accounted arson; for, during the lease, the house is the property of the tenant g †.
b 1 Hal. P. C. 567. c 3 Inst. 69.
d 1 Hawk. P. C. 105. c Cro. Car. 377. 1 Jon. 351.
f 1 Hal. P. C. 568. 1 Hawk. P. C. 106. g Fost. 115.
* An attempt or preparation to set fire to one's own house in a town, though the fire is never kindled, is a misdemesnor... Christian.
† And it has been expressly determined, that if a tenant set fire to the house of his landlord, he is not guilty of arson. Breeme's Case, Leach, 195. 209... Christian. 
So what it is refering to is setting fire to one's own house in a town. BlankVerse 09:46, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: A better description needed
Talk:San Jose, Nueva Ecija

message: Don Canuto Ramos was the first Alcalde Municipal
--------
Hello.
http://michaelmanalolazo.forumotion.ca  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.217.47.240 (talk) 06:14, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

message: There is a discussion regarding the removal of the word "city" from the article titles of Philippine cities.  This may imminently affect the article name for .  For city names which are not unique, disambiguation alternatives are also being presented.  Formal request for page move may follow after a reasonable time of discussion.  If you wish to participate, please post your comments here.  --JinJian (talk) 04:53, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: <Cityname> 
<City>


message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Valencia City, Bukidnon which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 06:16, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Seductive Poison

message: He is a fringe theorist who writes statements such as"Jonestown was an experiment, part of a 30-year program called MK-ULTRA, the CIA and military intelligence code name for mind control."
Also, not notability has been establish for and LL Layton cite.Mosedschurte (talk) 02:05, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: John Judge is not a reliable source

message: Re , you were already blocked for repeatedly adding such irrelevant and unreliably sourced material here as evidenced again here.
They are not proper, and especially egregious given your proclamation before being blocked last time that "These edits here won't end. I promise you."Mosedschurte (talk) 18:11, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Please Stop Adding Ratical.org and Debbie Layton personal tidbits to book article

message: The page has been fully protected for three days.  Discuss content changes here rather than inserting or reverting them.  Thank you. Protonk (talk) 17:01, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page protected
Talk:Wall jump

message: Does the list of wall-jumping characters need to be here?  One might even argue against a few of them, and I don't know what it would add to the article itself.  The graphic works, of course, and citing them in a main body of text could do the same, but a stand-alone list wouldn't even come close to being exhaustive. IL-Kuma 10:52, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Should the characters in the Super Smash Bros. series which can wall jump in the games be included in the list of characters? 124.121.90.205 (talk) 12:27, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Super Smash Bros. wall jumpers.
Talk:Vigoro

message: Hi this page is incomplete, I intend to work on this over the next few days Actuarial disco boy 11:01, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Gibbs Aquada

message: What a great pity.Their products are not yet available.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.126.4.77 (talk) 11:08, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: pity

message: I'm pretty sure 1 hour 40 isn't the fastest crossing of the channel! The hovercraft used to do it in 50 mins 20 years ago, even the big ferries only take an hour and a half.  Maybe it's the fastest crossing in an amphibious craft?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.243.39.227 (talk) 18:01, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: speed
Talk:New South Wales State Plan

message: I have updated the page somewhat, and toned down the politics section. The cost of advertising the plan is relevant as are the Opposition comments (though a bit less so). As the Plan has been in existence for some time it might be useful to replace the costings criticism with Opposition criticism of the Plan content. Costings criticisms no longer an immediate political issue, while criticisms of the Plan content may well be.
I also removed the image which was hard to read, was not principally about the State Plan and when combined with the Opposition comments, gave too much weight to the costing criticism (the image was as prominent as the State plan image itself, and costing criticisms are not as important as the entire Plan).
I also removed the reference to consultation with bureaucrats. Various bureaucrats were required to attend the consultation sessions to answer questions from the public but they were not part of the formal public consultation process. Euryalus 04:00, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page update 