Template talk:Category more

message: This has a different, and in my opinion, better, way of linking to the main article. Brianjd 08:36, 2004 Dec 24 (UTC)
It's Read the main article on Adages.... If all categories did this, there would be a lot of duplicated boilerplate text.
However, are you referring to the visual things, such as the expansion of the link onto the whole sentence? --Joy [shallot] 13:12, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:Category:Adages]] 

message: I removed the word "please" from this template.  Usability studies in general find that every extra word in a message like this dramatically reduces the number of people who actually read it.  "Please" is a standard example of the kind of word not to include in this kind of message.  dbenbenn | talk 23:08, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed "please" 

message: No idea why that's protected: . Omniplex  21:00, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected 

message: Hi, I wish to put forth my thoughts about this template.
Would it helpful to include the link to the subject matter that is being recommended? I feel it would certainly help and saves copying and pasting the word/phrase..
thanks 203.214.2.144 13:50, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where's the all-crucial wikilink? 

message: This template seems overly wordy, with "please see the article about Foo"; what's wrong with just, "please see Foo"? —RuakhTALK 20:32, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overly wordy? 

message: Please, add sl:Predloga:Članek ktgr 1. Thanks a lot. --Eleassar my talk 12:09, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done in a moment. Luna Santin 19:31, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Interwiki

message: Not all pages are articles, maybe this should be changed to For more information, see the page about .
Or even (as suggested by someone before) For more information, see .
Simply south 20:38, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Cheers. --MZMcBride 03:47, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article 

message: Sometimes newer users are trying to use/understand this stuff.  "page " is not a page I can simply goto; where is it? tooold (talk) 15:12, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  For more information, see the page about {{{1}}} 

message: Image:Symbol a class.svg
It would be similar to what GA and FA have allready. Nergaal (talk) 04:14, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please add this image to the A-class

message: I added a usage example to the documentation page, and a note discouraging usage of this template.  and  should be used in preference to this template in most cases. The only functionality this template has that they don't is the ability to pipe the link, but catmore links on category pages should generally not be piped. Rather, the text needs to refer to the actual title of the linked article. We aren't telling the reader to go read about a topic, we are referring the reader to a specific article, by name.--Srleffler (talk) 02:40, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Usage notes and deprecation 

message: I believe this is a dablink, and should be marked up as one. Code:

For more information, see .


Please update the template. Thanks. —Ms2ger (talk) 16:09, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That sounds right. , cheers. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 16:41, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dablink 

message: The /documentation should note the "Cat" aspect. Today it is: why is the word "Cat" in the template name at all? DePiep (talk) 18:52, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Good question.  I am assuming it is the same reason why we have  instead of just .  Otherwise, we could just merge this with  or .  I don't have a strong opinion either way, but there seems to be some history behind the division between article hatnotes and category hatnotes. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:24, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I do understand there are reasons for different hatnotes (and indeed do merge them when possible ;-)). It's just I do not understand the usage from /doc here. I do not search any change, I only ask for better /documentation. -DePiep (talk) 19:33, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, in that case, go ahead and update the documentation to make it more clear. Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:41, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, but I am the one that doesn't understand it. I could only add "this template seems to be needed when... " etc. Also, it has to do with hidden cats. I ask my fellow nerds to document their specials. I might be asked the same elsewhere for sure. -DePiep (talk) 19:46, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The documentation should be almost identical to , with the only difference being the wording of the hatnote ("for more information" vs. "the main article").  Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:54, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: You are kind and gentile to lead me into the clarifying level, but that would help only me. Any clarifying answer you type here, could & should be in the /doc right away. I resist the invitation to improve /doc myself: I am not to WTFM (unless I like doing it).  -DePiep (talk) 20:02, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, I would rather not do it either, since I don't really think this template is necessary to begin with.  Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:05, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: When one doesn't like doing it, one don't have to! Is half the Wikifun. I suggest closing this thread. -DePiep (talk) 20:09, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cat? 

message: There was a template called Template:Cat more multi until someone converted it into Template:Cat main multi, which was recently merged into Template:Cat main. By copying the source of Template:Cat main, I have recreated Template:Cat more multi. It only has one transclusion which I have added. Can somebody please merge it into this template in the same way as Template:Cat main multi? McLerristarr | Mclay1 10:53, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay. Will do. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:50, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. McLerristarr | Mclay1 10:52, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template:Cat more multi 

message: The sandbox has been nominated for deletion -- 65.94.79.6 (talk) 02:27, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Template:Cat more/sandbox]]