lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Masculism

message: There is a request for comment at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Gender studies#Navigation templates: masculism related to this page. Please join the discussion there. Thank you. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 23:03, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The RfC has ended, and is archived at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Gender studies/Archive 5. --Sangdeboeuf (talk) 00:55, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Navigation templates RfC 

message: I propose the merging of Meninism into Masculism. Both articles are already quite short, and I think that the subjects of both articles are doubtless similar enough to justify a merger. —Entity137 (talk) 09:17, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this might be a good idea. I think we would just have to make sure the discussion of the actual term meninism, apart from the discussion of the term masculism, is discussed somewhere in the article. BappleBusiness (talk) 00:37, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

text: I concur, there's no reason for this article to exist separately. LΞVIXIUS💬 18:56, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

text: I agree the two pages should be merged. Chrisisreed (talk) 14:39, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: There is nothing in the article about gender discrimination related to conscription and military service. Arty32 (talk) 07:17, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably because the sources don't mention it. You are free to add such material to the article that is supported by an independent reliable source. --Sangdeboeuf (talk) 23:04, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conscription and military service 

message: Might be nice to include feminist perspectives about masculism, since the article includes masculist perspectives about feminism. For instance, many feminists would argue in favor of men's rights and say that women are not the only people oppressed by patriarchy. And others might make critiques of "men's rights" as a distraction. 4kbw9Df3Tw (talk) 03:13, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Feminist perspectives
Talk:Motherboard

message: * www.computerhope.com/wmic.htm
 Windows wmic command line command
 BASEBOARD	 Base board (also known as a motherboard or system board) management.
"baseboard" seems to be a somewhat official Microsoft Windows WMIC term, so it deserves to be mentioned in the lede.-71.174.188.32 (talk) 17:18, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  baseboard 

message: the text that say pcie or what it is points i believe at an agp slot.84.212.111.156 (talk) 11:48, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  think i found an error in the picture in the top right 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Parentboard. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  signed, Rosguill talk 19:01, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Parentboard" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Montana

message: This section heavily references the Montana Field Guide website. The references are not consistent: each stat within one sentence cited while the next sentence has no citation at all. Could the citations in the text and in the references be cleaned up by citing the field guide at its index level instead of within each section? MountainBarley (talk) 04:05, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flora and Fauna References
Talk:Mr. T

message: I agree with mentioning his name at birth and the way he shortened it when his father left but to continue through the page referring to him as "Tureaud" is disrespectful. He had his name changed legally at 18 to Mr. T and that is the name that should be used. Nathanieloffer (talk) 02:04, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  Rkkdb (talk) 13:19, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Respecting the person by using their legally chosen name 

message: M. T appearing in a 2023 Skechers footwear ad 2601:202:100:77D0:F445:B51F:A913:9D72 (talk) 02:28, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The section devoted to Commercials, totally leaves out one of the funniest Skechers Footwear ads in 2023. The spokesperson reminds viewers "there is no T in skechers," at which Mr. T enters the scene asking what the spokesperson is talking about, points down at his footwear (Skechers) and says "here's a T in skechers," and proceeds to show off several other styles of skechers.
Talk:Metrizable space

message: I am pretty sure that that the space is submetrizable means that it contains a metrizable subspace or the space is homeomorphic to such a space, but I couldn't find (by means of quick google search) a reference to back this. Does anyone confirm this? Without defining Submetrizablity we can't go deep into the metrizable problems in my opinion. -- Taku 03:40, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Submetrizablity 

message: Most texts, Dugundji being an example, consider normality to be a stronger separation axiom than regularity, not weaker. But then this is normality as T_{4}, and regularity as T_{3}. Without some clarification in this article, it isn't clear what Urysohn actually said.
Further, this article needs style editing--or is it just me who thinks articles on general topology should avoid sounding flippant?
198.54.202.102 (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 15:14, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Separation Axioms

message: Under Tychonoff's assumptions X is in fact normal: second-countable implies Lindelöf, and Lindelöf + regular implies normal (this is Tychonoff's lemma). Tychonoff's contribution (his Lemma) was therefore more general than to just extend Urysohn's Metrization Theorem.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.32.45.74 (talk) 20:54, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tychonoff's vs. Urysohn version 

message: Hi guys, I'm a bit unclear on what the \tau in the tuple (X,\tau) is; can anyone shed some light on this? Do we approach this bracketed form similar to tuples in measure theory? thanks. 174.3.155.181 (talk) 20:28, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Assuming you are referring to the lead: \tau refers to the topology on the space X under consideration. I hope this helps clarify. Definitely add in clarification to the text if you think this is unclear. Zfeinst (talk) 22:32, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Definition

message: Semi-metrizable/Semi-metrisable/Semimetrizeable redirect to Metrizable space (they used to redirect to Metrization theorem before that page was moved to Metrizable space), but semi-metrizability is not defined at the target page, and apparently never was, at least I didn't find it in the article history. Can someone please add the definition? Thanks! – Tea2min (talk) 11:27, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Semi-metrizable" not defined
Talk:Mac operating systems/Archive 1

message: This article is pretty weak the way it is (which includes the stuff I wrote) and Mac OS history is weak the way it is.  Is there a reason why we don't merge these two together?  It's hard to talk about MacOS without talking history. Fuzheado 00:22, 25 Sep 2003 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Mac OS history 

message: I do not feel comfortable enough to change it but it is the applications that are classic not the operating system
Freeware 16:04, 17 Nov 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: Classic, strictly speaking, is the name of the environment used to run Mac OS 9 and its applications on Mac OS X.  The term has been generalized to refer to both "Classic applications" and "Mac OS Classic", which may not be strictly correct but is nonetheless generally understood.Drernie 19:43, 18 Nov 2003 (UTC)
thread_title:  Applications, not OS, are classic 

message: I think the software list could be split into OS X and classic.  Perhaps also moved to a seperate page.  As it approaches becomming comprehensive it would be huge list...  :Flimsyq 21:26, 7 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, Actually I think it would be a sensible move to create a separate page, List of Macintosh software, which can be linked from several Mac related entries. I think the inclusion of these lists (of which there are several scattered on different pages), actually doesn't enhance these articles, and is problematic due to the sheer potential length of the list. The list should be broken down into sections - Currently released by Apple, formerly released by Apple, and third parties. Graham 22:51, 7 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Splitting software list 

message: "Until the advent of the G3 era systems (the so-called "new world" machines),"
This is not correct. The first G3 machines were old world, for example, the G3 233, 266 and 300, and the Powerbook G3 series, called "Walstreet".
How about "The return of Steve Jobs, ushering in the new world ROMs, USB, Firewire, and banishing floppy drives and ADB peripherals and serial printers." Castlan 13:38, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: That doesn't sound very encyclopedic, that sounds more like something from a story passage. I've made a more basic change to the sentence that makes it correct. — Wackymacs 13:55, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  New World Machines
Talk:Musical instrument

message: I noticed the definition in this article says: "A musical instrument makes sounds. Once humans moved from making sounds with their bodies—for example, by clapping—to using objects to create music from sounds, musical instruments were born."
This excludes the human voice. However, most articles on Wikipedia about singers list in the info box that one of their instruments is "Vocals". 
I would like to see consistency on Wikipedia. Would it be best just to amend this one article to conform to all the articles that consider Vocals an instrument? --Diligens (talk) 22:45, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The best place for that discussion would either be the talk page of , or one of the Village Pumps. Nikkimaria (talk) 23:54, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should VOCALS be Considered a "Musical Instrument"? 

message: Musical instruments of Israel mostly perform during their religious activities. Aerophones, membraphones, percussion and chordophones instruments are its types 119.93.223.239 (talk) 14:00, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I will be astonished to be shown a source claiming that there is so little secular music in Israel that saying "Musical instruments of Israel mostly perform during their religious activities." is anywhere near accurate. Just plain Bill (talk) 14:23, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Israeli instruments 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Field instruments and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 7#Field instruments until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  signed, Rosguill talk 15:14, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Field instruments" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: "Technology" (not to be confused with high technology) is an integral aspect of musical instruments, esp. in their design and construction. fgnievinski (talk) 05:17, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see anything at that article that is both sourced and appropriately placed here. Some of the details could, if sourced, be added to their respective specific instrument articles (eg timpani). Nikkimaria (talk) 03:03, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

text: That article is pretty much a nothing burger, and I doubt there's much to merge. I would perhaps just blank and redirect. Why? I Ask (talk) 05:41, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, there's nothing worth salvaging in that article. Blank and redirect. Popcornfud (talk) 12:33, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

text: Blank and redirect. Jacqke (talk) 17:15, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Music instrument technology]] into [[Musical instrument]]
Talk:Mumia Abu-Jamal

message: ' 'Beneath the Mountain: An Anti-Prison Reader,' ' published by City Lights Publishers. 3/19/2024. ISBN 9780872869264. Jane199923 (talk) 23:06, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Heart (talk) 00:59, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 19 May 2023 

message: Rapper KRS-One made a song named "Free Mumia" in his 1995 album. Perhaps someone could add that in there if that's allowed Hasayo (talk) 18:45, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Representations in popular culture - KRS One song 

message: This is my second time writing, I'm hoping you can submit this under his Written Works. This is a forthcoming title from City Lights Publishers to come in 2024. 
Beneath the Mountain: An Anti-Prison Reader. City Lights Publishers (2024), ISBN 9780872869264. Edited by Mumia Abu-Jamal and Jennifer Black. Janesane33 (talk) 21:14, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 11:00, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 31 May 2023 

message: {{subst:trim|1=
Could you please move "Beneath the Mountain: An Anti-Prison Reader, City Lights Publishers (2024), ISBN 9780872869264” under “Written Works” on Mumia Abu-Jamal’s Wikipedia page to the very top of that list instead of the very bottom? Mumia’s previous works are listed in reverse chronological order so this change would just ensure that pattern is maintained. 
: Xan747 (talk) 21:35, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 5 July 2023
Talk:Monk (disambiguation)

message: Comments concerning the subject "Monk" transferred to the relevant article, viz. Monk. 00:45, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

message: If Monk is notable enough to appear in List of programmes broadcast by CITV it is also notable enough to appear here. The fact that people confuse it with the detective show is another reason to include it and this gives people the opportunity to write the article, no questioning the subject matter is notable. Thanks, ♫ SqueakBox talk contribs 20:27, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: citv
Talk:M. C. Escher

message: On the main wikipedia page, if you start typing in "M.C. Escher", it will offer suggestions, including this page.  The title of the suggestion it brings up is:
   M. C. Escher
   Dutch graphic artist (1898-1792)
Death year is obviously a typo.
:Thanks for reporting this. I've corrected the  which had the incorrect date. MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 15:42, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death date is incorrect in a hidden field. 

message: Video on YouTube: Metamorphose (link not permitted).
"... documentary about M.C. Escher' life produced by CINEMEDIA in co-production with Nederlandse Programma Stichting (NPS) and Radio Netherlands Television (RNTV) in 1999." 
I'd be happy to see an External Link to this. Thanks. Marty Mangold (talk) 02:44, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  On the whole we try both to minimise lists in External links, and to avoid linking to videos. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:43, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional External Links 

message: Under section titled “Mathematically Inspired Work”, please change the word “disconnect” in “Escher's work is inescapably mathematical. This has caused a disconnect…” to the word “disconnection”.  “Disconnect” is a verb; “disconnection” is the noun that should be used here. 2600:6C4E:1400:BBE:C141:7192:2FB0:E635 (talk) 04:26, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. However in the USA, Merriam-Webster for instance lists it also as a noun, with definition and example, and it gives a specific sense which is correctly used here. In the UK, Cambridge Dictionary does the same. Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:44, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 27 March 2023 

message: Unless others disagree, I propose to add a link from "counterchange symmetry or antisymmetry" in the Legacy: in mathematics and science section, to the newly created article Dichromatic symmetry. GreatStellatedDodecahedron (talk) 13:06, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  Seems good! Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:58, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Counterchange symmetry or antisymmetry
Talk:Mössbauer effect

message: Is there a reason someone removed the umlaut from Mössbauer? -- Matt Stoker
Umlauts are not Wikifiable. Meaning you can't put brackets around it and make it a link. Same goes for most special characters. --MemoryHole.com
You can make it display, just not actually link: Mössbauer Spectroscopy links to the first term and displays the second, like so: Mössbauer Spectroscopy. The linking is supposed to be resolved I think with .92, but I'm not sure. --KQ
Fine, but why not leave the umlauts in the unlinked text? -- Matt Stoker
:With MediaWiki 1.5 we don't have such a problem anymore (as I've understood), so I just was bold moved the page a moment ago. I hope it's fine. — Pt (T) 23:27, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Note that it's not the rays which are behaving in a certain way. It's due to the properties of the gas/metal target. X- and gamma rays are both forms of electromagnetic radiation, and they do overlap somewhat, but generally speaking gamma rays have higher energy, which is why the effect happens only for gamma rays. I can't say I understand the Mossbauer effect enough to give you specific wavelengths, but I'll put it on my to-do list. You may want to check out what HyperPhysics has on this (the link in the comment above yours). - mako 02:45, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Miscellaneous 

message: Could someone give it English subtitles?
:I'll second that request.  I assume the Chinese characters say something like "Photon counts" and "Energy [MeV]" for the vertical and horizontal axes, respectively. -- JeffreyRMiles 21:20, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Graph

message: There should be a notion as to why the Mößbauer Effect is so awesome that its used even though it has some very inconvienient requirements (like very low gamma decay energies for room-temperature meassurements). It would be visible in the graph, if it had english text.
The reason is: The energy resolution of the method is positively awesome.
You can get resolutions in the sub- ueV range, for total energies in the 10keV range.
There is no other spectroscopic methods that accurate.
: seconded. I was also hoping to find a description of the use of the ME on Cobalt-60? gamma rays that showed the energy gain(=frequency increase) as the gamma rays fell some tens of metres. Rod57 (talk) 14:53, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Stuff 

message: I would like to see a section explaining what the Reverse (or Inverted) Mossbauer Effect is.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.191.244.247 (talk) 19:02, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverse Mossbauer Effect? 

message: Cheers - Williamborg (Bill) 20:40, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Stockpiling references for later use on inline citations

message: Mossbauer Effect experiments helped to prove Einstein's theory that time is relative, and I expected to read about that here, but it's not covered. I can't add it because I don't know enough. Can someone who knows more please add something? Richard75 (talk) 19:45, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: You probably have in mind the Mössbauer rotor experiments. Tercer (talk) 14:45, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relativity
Talk:Messiah

message: How can Jesus be the Messiah and therefore the anointed one according to Surah 3:45 indicating a special, superior place for him and also in the same verse be the "WORD of God" while Muslims claim that he was only a prophet? Furthermore, he was also born to a virgin Mary confirming the christian position. But if Jesus has no human father who else could be his creator/father other than God? Why do Muslims reject the christian term "son of God" for him? Also Jesus spoke in the cradle(Surah 19:27-33) and was able to create life by turning clay into a living bird(Surah 5:110). 
Hardly the work of a prophet only. There are multiple indications in the Quran that Jesus was much more than just that. 80.131.61.141 (talk) 16:29, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: This talk page is for discussion of how to improve the article, not a forum. PepperBeast (talk) 19:58, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Islamic contradiction
Talk:Mushroom

message: I am wondering whether, in addition to the "References" and "Literature Cited" sections, this could do with a "Further reading" section. The book "The Octopus Book of Mushrooms" could go here  - it is quite a good guide to common mushrooms, and depicts which mushrooms are poisonous, which are inedible and which are edible. Vorbee (talk) 17:19, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Further reading

message: I am sorry to report that Google were placing your photo of fly agaric above search results for pizza recipes, under the heading of "pizza toppings", until I pointed out their error. Please consider editing the content of this article to prevent similar, potentially fatal, mistakes. Images can easily be circulated out of context and not everyone in search of a good photo will read the accompanying text. Bergamo Moth (talk) 15:38, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a Google issue, not a Wikipedia one. — The Hand That Feeds You:Bite 13:56, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misunderstanding 

message: "Fliegenpilz" is not a German name for the toadstool, as the etymology section suggests, but the German name for fly agaric specifically. It's a small edit, but since the article is semi-protected I can't change it, maybe someone else could? Alabandic (talk) 21:58, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology Edit  

message: I think the use of the word, to denote rapid growth, e.g., "to mushroom," arises from the phenomenon of a, "mushroom cloud."  If so, it wouldn't have applicability to the biological species, regardless of how bounteously they propogate.71.171.17.159 (talk) 07:12, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The term existed long before nuclear weapons existed. — The Hand That Feeds You:Bite 18:32, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Growth 

message: Mushrooms communicate with each other with electrical signals that match up to 50 needs,https://www.theguardian.com/science/2022/apr/06/fungi-electrical-impulses-human-language-study?utm_source=pocket-newtab Lmharding (talk) 03:16, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  New discovery announced