lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Malebolge

message: This page duplicates much of what is in Inferno (Dante). Is there any reason for a separate page on Malebolge? Radagast3 (talk) 09:52, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree with , lots of overlap with Inferno (Dante)#Malebolge. Perhaps merge into Inferno article and redirect? Spirit Ethanol (talk) 22:48, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why exactly does this page exist? 

message: Some relevant old page history can be found at Talk:Malebolge/Old history. Graham87 01:17, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old page history
Talk:Market place

message: Definition come from http://www.investordictionary.com/definition/marketplace.aspx (copyright ?)—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.157.131.196 (talk • contribs) .
:Actually if you look at the bottom of that page, it states "The article above is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. The article is derived from The Free Encyclopedia.com".  And if you follow the link to The Free Encyclopedia.com, that article states at the bottom "This article above is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. The article may be derived fully or in part from Wikipedia.org".  And if you click on the Wikipedia.org link, you end up at Marketplace.  I think that's all kosher, if a little confusing. It's all Wikipedia mirrors.  - BanyanTree 17:12, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Still I would say definition must be acompanied by the name of person who gave it.We must also provide references.Why not to stick to Philip Kotler's Version who is an authority on this subject.Holy|Warrior 12:31, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  copyright 
Talk:Queensway (Hong Kong)

message: This road is only one section of a larger road. There was only one sentence unique to this article.  I've merged that sentence to Queen's Road and redirected this article there.  SchmuckyTheCat 09:48, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: They are, legally speaking, four roads. The Queensway, in particular, does not share part of its name like the other three do. — Instantnood 19:20, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is one road.  That they are called "Way, Central, East, West" is irrelevant.  This one sentence stub article does not contain any information that can't be in Queen's Road. See that talk page for more details of why. SchmuckyTheCat 21:24, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You've got their Chinese names, don't you? — Instantnood 18:42, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: or heck,  SchmuckyTheCat 18:29, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Queensway Road

message: What made Hong Kong Government change both English and Chinese names in 1967?  — HenryLi (Talk)
:See next section Onanoff (talk) 06:14, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why the name changed in 1967? 
Talk:Splatterhouse 2

message: Please stop changing the fact that this game was released four years after the original. Gingerfield rocks 09:51, 16 January 2006
:You are missing the point, which is why I have continued to revert your info (while not entirely incorrect, it is just being tacked onto the wrong section). The Story section is detailing the story of the game, not the release of the cartridge itself. Simple as that. The physical release date (in year only) is clearly visible in the opening paragraph. So, I'd ask of you to please stop changing the story section's time frame.TheMonkofDestiny 06:18, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:When in Rome (2002 film)

message: Haha, the sardonic air of this article is just wonderful.
Agreed.  Please keep it this way!  :D 
(Looking over the edits, I'm afraid the Plot heading will be edited later, so for the record it is currently one sentence and reads "90 minutes of filler material sandwiched between 2 minutes of plot each side."  --71.107.217.63 18:20, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

message: I've seen this movie a few times, so I added a bit extra to it. Me too.
This article is fail.
There is nothing relevant to this movie at all. I'm so editing this...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.26.45.149 (talk) 08:30, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added Extras
Talk:Indian Kashmir barrier

message: #REDIRECT Talk:Line_of_Control
India got that idea for israel???
Where have you found that?
I see someone has moved this from Indian Kashmir Barrier.  Could they move it back please?  The Indo-Kashmir Barrier implies India shares a border with Kashmir and so is not NPOV.  The barrier is Indian.  It is in Kashmir.  It does not divide India from Kashmir. Lao Wai 10:00, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *Agreed , a user has already merged it to Line_of_Control#Indian_Line_of_Control_fencing --DBigXray 12:22, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Gravity roll

message: The current description of the technique doesn't make any sense to me.  Anyone want to try to clarify it?  dbtfztalk 01:20, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, it's understandable now.  What would really be cool is an audio clip of what it sounds like.  :-)  dbtfztalk 03:05, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I just watched the Johnny Rabb video linked to from the Freehand technique article.  It shows in great detail how the technique works, and is very helpful.  I really think that the two articles should be merged, as has been suggested, though I'll leave that to someone with more expertise on the subject.  dbtfztalk 03:22, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Huh? 

message: Why and where does this article need additional citations for verification? What references does it need and how should they be added? Hyacinth (talk) 21:16, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional citations

message: Perhaps this article would be suitable to merge as a section of the blast beat article, since it is essentially a variation of the same sonic goal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vortiene (talk • contribs) 19:30, 25 November 2013
:I think it should be merged. A Google Books search for "'gravity roll' 'drumming' -wikipedia" turns up 0 results (while taking "drumming" out of quote marks turns up 138, most of them auto-generated content & unrelated to music). Hyacinth (talk) 04:39, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?
Talk:Song and Dance

message: WOuld love to know the srouce for the Leyton Orient story - and do you mean the whole of VARIATIONS? I have not heard the tale before.... is it urban myth? Robsteadman 10:08, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

message: If I'm not very much mistaken, that's the song listing for Tell Me on a Sunday -- not the first act of Song and Dance.  At least, not the Bernadette Peters Broadway version.  I think it might be the Marti Webb version, before things were streamlined and made to be coherent.  I could go in the other room and check my CD's, but I'm not in the mood right now.  When I do, I may fix this.  MusicMaker5376 20:09, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Song listing 

message: I remember this song being part of Tell Me On A Sunday.  Was this song removed for Song and Dance?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by DaDoc540 (talk • contribs) 
:As far as I know, it was.  —  MusicMaker 05:33, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Last Man In My Life'' 
Talk:Adrian (costume designer)

message: Are there any photo's of the man? Even Edith Head has 2.Why is the filmography in backwards chronological order? And why are so few of these (mostly major) films linked? -- Jmabel | Talk 10:35, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Edited filmography to chronological order as part of another edit, though it's really a stylistic choice, so I won't object if it's reverted. As to the lack of film links, I think the reason was to avoid creating a block of redlinks (only those films with existing articles were linked, I notice.) GeeJo (t) (c) •  22:02, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

text: So many non-Garbo films have been permitted to creep into this "filmography" that it should be deleted and a link to a dependable on-line filmography substituted. --Wetman 02:43, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled comments 
Talk:S-50 (Manhattan Project)

message: There are references for the Philip Abelson article that might be useful here and vice versa. I think also that the references here might be used to correct some confusion in the Philip Abelson article about his exact involvement with naval nuclear propulsion. I think it understates his early work while overstating (until I changed some things) his later work during the Rickover era. --A. B. (talk) 17:14, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Philip Abelson]]
Talk:Arnaldo Antunes

message: Uh wow. This is actually a much fuller article than the one at Portuguese Wiki. How bizarre!--T. Anthony 10:44, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bausch & Lomb

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover)  ASUKITE 15:38, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Bausch & Lomb →  – The actual company name and used in all other parts of the article Qwv (talk) 22:53, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

text: This is a contested technical request (permalink). Steel1943 (talk) 05:22, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  Pinging participants in the WP:RMTR discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 05:23, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

text: That seems like it might run afoul of MOS:TM. The company itself is also not completely consistent in its usage. The footer of their website says "©2022 Bausch & Lomb Incorporated" and the headline of their SEC 10Q filing says "BAUSCH & LOMB CORP filed this 10-Q on 08/04/22". The Wikipedia article is also not completely consistent it has about a dozen instances of "Bausch & Lomb" in it. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 05:16, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 1 September 2022
Talk:Farsightedness

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) -- Maddy from Celeste (WAVEDASH) 15:02, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Far-sightedness →  – This term is used more often without that hyphen than with the hypen. See this ngram. Move per WP:COMMONNAME. – Treetoes023 (talk) 03:56, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  British English doesn't use the term "farsightedness", it uses the term "long-sightedness" (which does have a hyphen). – Treetoes023 (talk) 03:37, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 25 November 2023 

message: The comment about IOL being the “best” solution needs better discussion and suppprt. Mjs92117 (talk) 14:27, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: will look--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 17:23, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsupported assertion about IOL
Talk:Scleral lens

message: Contact lens is currently nominated to be improved on Wikipedia:Article Improvement Drive. Please support the article with your vote. --Fenice 10:51, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Improvement Drive

message: I think this needs to be tidied up a bit to get rid of the Jargon. If I Was a patient who was told I would be getting Scleral Lenses, then I wouldn't have any idea what any of this means. 
Superzekystarship (talk) 19:25, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Less Jargon 

message: no mention of 'terrien's marginal degeneration'. Due to corneal thinning Scleral lens should be an option as form of treatment once standard corrective lenses (glasses) become non-effective.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Balkor2 (talk • contribs) 16:13, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indications for use 

message: Is there a way to limit external linking? I'm new to wikipedia editing, there's got to be a way to do it. If you look in the article history, there have been links added to random external websites somewhat frequently 65.34.203.193 (talk) 16:16, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links to commercial websites
Talk:Nearly God

message: Why does the song title "Black Coffee" link to an older song? It should link to a specific article about that recording of the song, not an earlier version. Otherwise, it should not be a link.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.8.122.250 (talk) 19:09, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Black Coffee Link 

message: Some tracks of this album (especially the ones featuring Björk) are really slow... i would say 'deep'. "Keep Your Mout Shut" for example, it lacks any beat before the minute mark. And "Yoga" is a single tape loop all the way (made with some really odd samples).
I would incorporate "Ambient" and "Abstract music" to the genres' section. Do we need a source for that? 'Trip-Hop' is such a generic term.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.220.233.211 (talk) 02:15, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Album genre
Talk:Wives aboard Noah's Ark

message: The following content and its source are being edit warred over; it is being removed on the basis that the source isn't reliable and restored on the basis that the source is reliable. 
I agree that the source is not reliable.  But to resolve this I will open a a thread at RSN to get community input.  Will post a link here after I post there.   
The Miautso people of China preserved in their traditions the name of Noah's wife as Gaw Bo-lu-en.
For now, please leave this out.  If it is validated at RSN we will of course restore it. Jytdog (talk) 17:40, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: done. see Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Miao_people.27s_tradition_of_the_name_of_Noah.27s_wife Jytdog (talk) 17:42, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

text: Any of them a WP:RS? The article has too much unsourced material in it already. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 21:00, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

text: You can take your pick from the ample references to Truax.  Also if this helps convince you on good faith at least some of them really do have an authentic legend of Ndrao-ya and his sister Go Bolwen, check out this telling I found https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VsagNsgBSnY
172.58.224.242 (talk) 22:36, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The content above is getting rejected thus far at RSN.  Truax will also be found to be unreliable.  The youtube video is not reliable.  Please read WP:RS; please stop bringing unacceptable sources. Thanks.  Jytdog (talk) 22:37, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Miao people tradition
Talk:Moderation in Islam

message: I'm having a hard time finding good external links on this subject. Also, I believe the word also refers to the middle finger... Any Arabic speakers are welcome to add this meaning if it is the case. Thanks. --LeoNomis 11:19, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You're probably having a problem finding links on this subject because you're looking for the wrong word.  The word you need to look for is not "wasat" --- it's "wasatiyyah" (wasaṭīyyah) (وسطية).  I'd go ahead and make the correction for you, but I'm not sure how to go about correcting the title of your article --- perhaps you know how to do that.--Akhooha (talk) 23:31, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: You both appear to be correct. Bearian (talk) 18:44, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources and terms 

message: proposed merging this page with Moderate Muslim in February 2020.
* Oppose. This page appears to be about the concept of moderation within Islam. I don't have prior knowledge as to whether there are good sources on this topic or whether this is a well-developed concept within Islam, but the first three cited sources are enough to persuade me that this is potentially a notable topic. There is no reason to merge discussion of a concept within Islam (this article) with Moderate Muslim, which is about a modern dichotomy of moderate vs. extremist groups within Islam. Daask (talk) 15:04, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal with Moderate Muslim
Talk:Denton

message: It's wonderful to have found so many Dentons, but I wonder if every one of them need an article to themselves? I am trying to cover all the East Sussex villages at the moment - hence my change for the Sussex one: it is just a small part of the town of Newhaven. It seems to me that it would simply end up as a permanent stub! Peter Shearan 11:21, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  in addition I have also changed some of the others for similar reasons: giving a location for each of those I changed. And note that St Helens is Merseyside, not Lancashire; and surely Newcastle isn't Northumberland? Peter Shearan 11:43, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Zou Lunlun

message: *Article is promotional and POV
I think this article needs serious editing, or deletion in its current form. The article is almost completely copied from the subject's commercial/personal website, and reads like promotional material or is an advert. Also there are no references or citations. LDHan 14:57, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have made some edits to improve NPOV. LDHan 11:07, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

text: This page does need serious editing or partial deletion.  I think Zou Lunlun or an agent acting on her behalf has edited many guzheng related articles on Wikipedia through adding links and association of her name or picture in an effort to promote herself.  This is very dangerous because such information may be misleading as to who the most representative guzheng musicians really are. Clearlens 20:41, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Australia Card

message: Just to make this very clear, I'll go to prison before I accept a bloody Australia Card! And I am not joking. - Ta bu shi da yu 11:46, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And to think they laughed at me when I put "is still the subject of strong views" in the article!  -- Kevin Ryde 22:28, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There have been rumblings of reintroducing the idea...  --Elliot k 05:44, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: (If a new version gets up it's probably best to start a new page.  The original card has a goodly long story to it, when someone wants to tackle that.  -- Kevin Ryde 22:27, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've had a go.  --  JackofOz 23:02, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Strong views

message: We are actually running a business called The Australia Card with the website; www.theaustraliacard.com.au  I wonder. would it be possible to list us under " See Also"  with a reference to our card as otherwise many visitors may just continue looking for other alternatives and we miss out. With best regards, Hans SanderMuhcow (talk) 21:07, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: No sorry, not possible or permitted.  Wikipedia is not a place for business promotion or advertising. --Dmol (talk) 23:26, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Australia Card  

message: Most countries have some form of national identity card and with such a card it would be a lot easier to remove people in Australia illegally. Paul Benjamin Austin (talk) 00:57, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Should this be mentioned?  In a word, No.  Private opinions about such a matter have no part to play here.  --  Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 05:04, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  Wasn't actually my opinion. Psephos said this when criticising the Liberals for blocking it in 1987. Paul Benjamin Austin (talk) 05:32, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  question... should this be mentioned?
Talk:Einstein solid

message: This page seems ok but writing the formula in terms of hyperbolic functions is odd. More frequently in text books it the heat capacity is expressed as exponentials (cf. Deby model wiki page).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lgmac (talk • contribs) 12:10, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dispute 

message: ... Harmonic Oscillator??
Why not QHO?
--131.174.17.91 (talk) 17:27, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  SHO?? 

message: {\left(q+N^{\prime}-1\right)!\over q! (N^{\prime}-1)!} = {\left(q+N^{\prime}\right)!\over q! N^{\prime}!}
is not an approximation... is it?
--D昌양 (Talk) 18:13, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Wait, my bad. It is. --D昌양 (Talk) 19:28, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  approximation 

message: The article currently includes the line, "Although the Einstein model of the solid predicts the heat capacity accurately at high temperatures, and in this limit [equation], which is equivalent to Dulong–Petit law." This is not a complete sentence. Shankar Sivarajan (talk) 01:53, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sentence Fragment
Talk:Mother of Mine (film)

message: Multiple sources say that the World Premiere of Mother of Mine was at the Toronto International Film Festival in September 2005 (, ). I traced that claim back to this official press release where TIFF claims Mother of Mine as a world premiere. However, the review in Variety  states "Reviewed at Haugesund Film Festival, Norway, Aug. 20, 2005". The official press kit  from FilmMovement also describes the film as an official selection at the "New Norwegian Film Festival Haugesund 2005". I am thinking that, contrary to what the press kit says, Mother of Mine was not truly an official selection at the 2005 Norwegian International Film Festival but rather was included in the "New Nordic Films Market" () that is under the auspices of the The Norwegian International Film Festival Haugesund. If it screened in that "Market" in 2005, as opposed to a regular screening at the festival, then maybe Toronto was justified in claiming it as a world premiere? Mathew5000 (talk) 10:42, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  was world premiere in Haugesund or in Toronto?
Talk:Southern Taiwan University of Science and Technology

message: See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/History of Southern Taiwan University of Technology. I have made a cursory check for copyvio content but did not find any. If you spot any, please delete it on sight. Johnleemk | Talk 12:15, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: Even if there's no copyvios here, there's still a lot of unencyclopedic stuff to be taken out, and a bunch of unneccessary images to be sent to IfD. -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 17:20, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: I've remove text as copyvios. In places this is word-for-word the same as the source site. In others, the text appears to have been machine translated into another language and then back into poor English - this is still a violation of copyright. Copyright details can be found at the main homepage, http://www2.stut.edu.tw/ CLW 11:45, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvios 

message: The article about Shin Wen-Bing, a former president of Southern Taiwan University of Technology, may be deleted unless reliable references are added to the article. Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shin Wen-Bing. Perhaps an interwiki link could be added to the Chinese-language article on this person if one exists. --Eastmain 02:52, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Shin Wen-Bing]]