Talk:HiPER

message: This article has gone through a recent peer review and most of the comments were in terms of readability. I have attempted to incorporate them where possible. The article has also been reviewed by one of the principle researchers on the topic, who "signed off" on the factual accuracy (and pointed out a few gr and sp's too). Only minor edits have been carried out on the article for some time now.
The peer review did note a potential problem during GA, that there are only two refs, only one of which is linkable, and is not used as an in-line. The last point is due to the fact that the vast majority of the factual items in this article are taken from the linked source, so using an inline would be "redundant" because it would be repeated for just about every statement. The only exceptions are those that came from e-mails with Mike Dunne (as noted). The peer reviewer mentioned that I might want to place these here, I'd like to know what you all think. I am open to suggestions on this issue.
Maury 20:48, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Note to GA reviewers

message: For this to gain GA status, there must be inline citations. I'd say one per paragraph would suffice, but as many as possible are better. Even if the citations are very repetitive (they're all from one source), you should still put in-line citations. Take a look at California Gold Rush, a featured article. Even though there is one book cited like 25 times, in-line citations are given and page numbers are given after every sentence or two. That's what you should aim for. Go. Be Free. Jolb 01:59, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The only problem is the citation this work was taken from is an e-document. There aren't really any pages. And you don't tag is as lacking citations because of this.  Maury 03:14, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  In-line citations 

message: This article is good except for thre lack of inline citations. I understand there is currently discussionm about what to do but as of now this article doesn't meet the GA criteria and I am therefore failing it. If you feel that this review was in error feel free to take it to a GA review. Tarret 14:43, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Taken to GAR and fail endorsed. See the link in the article history for further comments. Geometry guy 20:06, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Failed

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 8 external links on HiPER. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100527191346/https://lasers.llnl.gov/programs/nif/how_nif_works/ to https://lasers.llnl.gov/programs/nif/how_nif_works/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110927140724/http://www.nuc.berkeley.edu/thyd/icf/IFE.html to http://www.nuc.berkeley.edu/thyd/icf/IFE.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080617120937/http://www.nuc.berkeley.edu/thyd/icf/target.html to http://www.nuc.berkeley.edu/thyd/icf/target.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080914105547/http://www.nuc.berkeley.edu/thyd/icf/driver.html to http://www.nuc.berkeley.edu/thyd/icf/driver.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101205144210/http://www.hiper-laser.org/pressandpr/journalarticles/atzeni_et_al_april2008.pdf to http://www.hiper-laser.org/pressandpr/journalarticles/atzeni_et_al_april2008.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110722152649/http://www.hiper-laser.org/docs/tdr/HiPERTDR2.pdf to http://www.hiper-laser.org/docs/tdr/HiPERTDR2.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070306025615/http://www.hiper-laser.org/docs/technical/HiPERoverview.pdf to http://www.hiper-laser.org/docs/technical/HiPERoverview.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070306080236/http://www.hiper-laser.org/docs/publications/Lasers.pdf to http://www.hiper-laser.org/docs/publications/Lasers.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:26, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified