lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Pro Patria Union

message: I don't have reference, but I followed closely the Estonia politics when this happened, and the Liberal Democratic Party was never part of the National Coalition Party 'Pro Patria'. It was in electoral alliance with the four constituent parties, but didn't join the unified party. Later it merged into the Reform Party.--213.243.158.185 14:19, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I looked it up, the Liberal faction in Riigikogu was formed on November 8, 1993. so far they were probably members of PP faction. But as for parties, I have to study it... --Constanz - Talk 14:24, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: =Liberal Denmocratic Party

message: www.isamaaliit.ee does not exist.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.235.62.140 (talk) 20:55, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: non-working link
Talk:Batman: Year Two

message: I would correct this myself if I had the issue numbers handy, but this article is just WRONG about what this story originally was. It first appeared as four consecutive issues of Detective Comics and was never, at any time, a mini-series in its own right. PurplePlatypus 09:28, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  It wasn't a mini-series!!! 

message: This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject.  If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class.  The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject.  Comics-awb (talk) 15:34, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Comics B-Class Assesment required

message: Should there be a mention that this was his first real breakthrough work?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.246.88.162 (talk) 11:03, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Todd McFarlane

message: As this B-Class article has yet to receive a review, it has been rated as C-Class. If you disagree and would like to request an assesment, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment and list the article. Hiding T  14:51, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: C-Class rated for Comics Project
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history/Peer review

message: hi,
where can i find the peer review details for the indo-pakistani war of 1971, as i felt that it deserved better than that.
anyways please put forward some suggestions for its elevation in ratings.
nids 06:28, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Replied on user's talk page. Kirill Lokshin 12:20, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Broadly speaking, no article can get A-Class without being properly cited.  That tends to be the main factor holding things back.  This particular article also needs the list sections at the bottom cleaned up, and should be lengthened accordingly.  Fundamentally, though, there are a lot of very important articles; unless people are interested in improving them, they're not going anywhere.  Kirill Lokshin 11:34, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: where do i find the peer review details for 1971

message: I tried adding military brat for peer review, but it is not showing up on this list... did I do something wrong?Balloonman 08:37, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Replied on user's talk page. Kirill Lokshin 14:18, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Military Brat]]
Talk:Sushil Kumar Modi

message: A suave learned experienced down to earth simple loveable faithful attractive calm composed loyal personality 
Mr Sushil Kumar Modi 
Please help the poor needy 
Take special care of our women folk 
Every womenfolk is our mother 
Sir 
With your knowledge and experience please please please empower the women folk of our country 
Any job openings in the Govt /Public /private sectors should be
notified to the eligible citizen all over India
Thanks please Sir 223.186.20.210 (talk) 09:28, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sushil Kumar Modi
Talk:B. S. Yediyurappa

message: Some sourced information about the above subject was added by me with relevant citations.https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/bengaluru/tesla-drives-into-bluru-with-new-co/articleshow/80239716.cms But I learnt that this edit was reverted by User:DaxServer with unexplained reasons. This has been a down-sliding development in my editing experience.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Souryadeep630 (talk • contribs) 12:14, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: @Souryadeep630 Yes, I've read the source. But the source never attributed the registration in Bangalore to efforts by Yediyurappa or by his government. Thus this addition, regardless of when and where Tesla registered, doesn't belong in the article of B. S. Yediyurappa, but it should be added to Bangalore or Economy of Bangalore or Economy of India or a related article. (This was also posted on my talk page. The discussion shall continue here.) -- DaxServer (talk) 12:35, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tesla Inc was first registered in bangalore during Yediyurappa's tenure
Talk:Anglo-American Committee of Enquiry

message: This is almost certainly a copyright violation. --Fang Aili 20:15, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

message: This article is misnamed, and inferior to the article about the Committee at the properly named location.  I am deleting the content and creating a redirect. -- kaosfere 17:44, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misnamed and inferior
Talk:Virbhadra Singh

message: Other than the "Audio CD Controversy' there isn't any citation in any section. I appeal to remove this article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by --Aryan wiki (talk) 09:29, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I see lots of references. Do you not see them?  Blue Rasberry (talk) 14:22, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you just do a major expansion on this article and add lots of referenced material? Wow! What an improvement!  Blue Rasberry (talk) 14:24, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Remove article

message: This is a biography of a living person. There have been numerous attempts to remove content relating to what appears to be an ongoing court case, eg: this. The detail that is being removed certainly seems to be undue weight but that does not mean that we should sanitise the article. One or two sourced sentences would be ok. It should also be noted that information is being added that is unsourced, and scripts are being added despite a recent RfC that determined they should not be for India-related articles. - Sitush (talk) 11:59, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  BLP issues
Talk:Vilasrao Deshmukh

message: http://aajtak.intoday.in/story/vilasrao-deshmukh-profile-1-704768.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.135.238.200 (talk) 08:47, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Due to recent death, Its better to semi-protect the article? I am seeing many I.P Address users changing and dislocating the info AbhiSuryawanshi (talk) 11:33, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Requests are to be made at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. Have made one already. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk)  12:07, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-Protect 
Talk:Mark Pivarunas

message: In reading this article I was amazed at the skill with which Mark Pivarunas' true background was avoided. Welcome to anyone who cares to get into the issue of documentation/verification, because there's a wealth of it out there.
To semper fi - I know you are the one editing this article, so much for your "covert operations". Just for your info, the info you are adding is not documented and you could be sued for libel. If you want it added, you need to use credible 3rd hand sources and add them properly. If not, leave the article alone!
George Wagner 06 06 06
George, I do loving playing with your enlarged head. Aside from that, Markie would be terrified at the can of worms you are opening. Keep it up, and you are going to find exactly where this faker's combat boots have been, what churches he has stolen from (rescuing?), and why he carried a .357 magnum around in his briefcase. The transcripts are available. Do you want to see your favorite "bishop" exposed?
You have yet to prove anything, and, I seriously doubt that you can. Next, I have a great idea as to who you are and I will know for shure in a few days. You talk the talk, but you have nothing behind your sail. All the changes that you made are not cited and will be deleted.
George Wagner 16 Jun 06
: I removed the most biased statements.  The encyclopdia should not attribute motivations to people.  Gimmetrow 20:10, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I added it to this page and a few others, including Schuckardt, as an experiment to get some feedback.  The *only* feedback I got was at the Schuckardt page, where three anons objected rather quickly, so I removed it from all the test pages but this one for the sake of comments. If you have any comment about wording, etc. it's welcome.  I also will not object if you remove it from this page.  Gimmetrow 20:34, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Pawan Kumar Chamling

message: This article has been cleaned to make it more encyclopedic. Please improve it by adding neutral information. Wikipedia does not allow propaganda in its articles. Read this before editing: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (Saildew (talk) 15:09, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Updated
Talk:N. D. Tiwari

message: Some parts of the paragraph are too graphic . Words like blow job are not needed in an encyclopedia.
173.3.205.190 (talk) 15:50, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: POV

message: There is a reference in article that N D Tiwari was known as Bada Tharki. This bad language. Please remove.
203.122.29.170 (talk) 19:10, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed. --regentspark (comment) 19:48, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request on 27 July 2012 
Talk:Neiphiu Rio

message: Note:  Project Banner with Nagaland workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Puducherry or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  Amartyabag  TALK2ME 10:15, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Nagaland Addition
Talk:Bactrosaurus

message: The referral of Cionodon kysylkumensis Riabinin 1931 to Bactrosaurus is after Nessov (1995). Norman and Sues (2000) found this assignment unjustified and C. kysylkumensis has been sunk as a junior synonym of Levensovia transoxiana by Averianov and Sues (2009).
Hans-Dieter Sues and Alexander Averianov. (2009). "A new basal hadrosauroid dinosaur from the Late Cretaceous of Uzbekistan and the early radiation of duck-billed dinosaurs." Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 276(1667): 2549-2555. doi:10.1098/rspb.2009.0229
Nessov, 1995. Dinozavri severnoi Yevrasii: Novye dannye o sostave kompleksov, ekologii i paleobiogeografii [Dinosaurs of Northern Eurasia: new data about assemblages, ecology and paleobiogeography], Scientific Research Institute of the Earth's Crust, St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia: 156 pp. + 14 pl. [in Russian with short English, German, and French abstracts].
Norman, David B.; Sues, Hans-Dieter (2000). "Ornithopods from Kazakhstan, Mongolia and Siberia". In Benton, Michael J.; Shishkin, Mikhail A.; Unwin, David M.; and Kurochkin, Evgenii N.. The Age of Dinosaurs in Russia and Mongolia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 462–479. 68.4.61.168 (talk) 17:15, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cionodon kysylkumensis 

message: How is Bactrosaurus "an early relative of Lambeosaurus" if the former is from 70 Ma and the latter from 75 Ma? Dave Norman's An Illustrated Encyclopedia of Dinosaurs (1985) says Bactrosaurus is from about 100 Ma (p. 116). I imagine this is outdated info? SaberToothedWhale (talk) 22:52, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "An early relative of Lambeosaurus"?
Talk:Bagaceratops

message: That first external link seems to be at the end of the articles for Bagaceratops as well as other small members of the Ceratopsia (Archaeoceratops, Bainoceratops, Leptoceratops, Montanoceratops, Prenoceratops, Breviceratops, Lamaceratops and Platyceratops), despite the fact that it only addresses the group in general (mainly the larger forms), and has very little, if any, relevancy to smaller forms like Bagaceratops, Breviceratops, etc.--which are known from Asia, despite the fact that American dinosaurs are the subject of the link.
Said link offers no information on the small forms whose articles link to it, so if you follow the link expecting to find information on one of these small forms, you end up scrolling halfway down the page just to realize that there is no information relevant to that dinosaur at all! Wouldn't it be better just to put that link on the article about Ceratopsidae, or even just dinosaurs in general? Instructing someone to scroll halfway down the page to find the information they want, when that information is very basic and probably already present on Wikipedia anyway, is tedious (for the reader) and unnecessary. 71.217.114.221 22:12, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a reasonable point.  I'll take it off the basal ceratopsians. J. Spencer 22:57, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove link? 

message: Hi, I would like to discuss...
As brought up here by , this paper from 2019 synonymized Gobiceratops, Lamaceratops, Magnirostris and Platyceratops into Bagaceratops. Unless anyone knows of any serious opposition to this, we should merge all these taxa like we did earlier with Nanotyrannus and Stygimoloch   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  17:33, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge discussion
Talk:Raman Singh

message: with chhattisgarh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Chhattisgarh or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 11:31, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/chhattisgarh workgroup Addition
Talk:Belgacom (ISP)

message: Considered a vanity article, using words as "the most successful portal", "grows beyond expectations". How is this verifyable ? Where is the NPOV ? ... DéRahier 20:20, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Chopped material on skynet (which is just a former company now part of Belgacom. RJFJR (talk) 17:11, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bahariasaurus

message: Correct me if I'm wrong, but Ekrixinatosaurus is described as being around 36ft in length. Ekrixinatosaurus was an abelisauroid ceratosaurian, so the comment that Bahariasaurus may have been the largest ceratosaur can't be right. Can we look into this and make any necessary corrections? -- Myrddin_Wyllt 11/19/12  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.224.227.201 (talk) 19:09, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Was bahariasaurus larger than t.rex, or t.rex was larger? ~~Dinosaur Fan~~  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dinosaur Fan (talk • contribs) 00:32, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: To date, T. Rex is considered the heaviest theropod that was a biped. More material is needed for Bahariasaurus to get a realistic 'feel' for its size.50.111.3.59 (talk) 10:16, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  T. rex 

message: Given the taxonomic uncertainty over Bahariasaurus, I consider it misleading to have a single life restoration on the page. I think there are two options here: either the page should contain a montage of life reconstructions of the different clades Bahariasaurus could belong to (carcharodontosaur, megaraptor-style Deltadromeus, elaphrosaur-style Deltadromeus, etc.)—ideally, all illustrated by a single artist in the same style—or it should contain no life restoration at all. Providing only a single life restoration is a violation of due weight, so I have removed the life reconstruction that was previously on this page. Ornithopsis (talk) 18:56, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Illustration
Talk:Chidambaram Subramaniam

message: *Article needs improved English syntax/style and sources.  —ERcheck @ 03:24, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup comment
Talk:Bambiraptor

message: Despite of mentions to size, it is never directly stated. --Extremophile 23:23, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  lacks size and weight information 

message: :"His decision was influenced by the cladistic viewpoint that because the skeletal structure of Bambiraptor closely resembled that of true birds, it must have had feathers due to phylogenetic bracketing."
That isn't how phylogenetic bracketing works. John.Conway 11:26, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed.--MWAK (talk) 11:24, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Phylogenetic bracketing and feathers 

message: Maybe I missed it, but I don't see that the animal was named after the Disney version of Bambi specifically. Is this sourced? Or should the link go to a more generic understanding of the character? Thmazing (talk) 17:21, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source of "Bambi" 
Talk:Krishan Kant

message: This article is a political whitewash. ⟳ausa کui × 08:49, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well it definitely has POV issues. I'm flagging it for that. Jasphetamine (talk) 01:06, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The sparse sourcing combined with the flowery style this article has going on leaves me uncomfortable with how it portrays the subject. Maybe he was a saint, but I'd expect any politician to have had some conflict or controversy at some point in time. Jasphetamine (talk) 01:18, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Jasphetamine, I've worked on this article for a couple of weeks now, and it looks like I've fixed the flowery-style writing. I've added additional sources and removed the outrightly hagiographic language. Please could you have a look and remove the neutrality tag? I understand that I can remove it myself but I usually prefer a second set of eyes / peer review. Thanks, Happy Hogmanay,  Boselaphus (talk) 22:48, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure, I’ll look over it now. Jasphetamine (talk) 22:54, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

text: It is still a little disorganized, but other than that you have significantly improved this article. Definitely tamed down the POV and improved the tone. Good stuff. Jasphetamine (talk) 23:07, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV issue 

message: Ghsgsvvb 2401:4900:26ED:17FB:0:54:5413:2D01 (talk) 07:16, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Qualification of APJ Abdul kalam 
Talk:Dimetrodon borealis

message: How come the other Dimetrodon species are redirected to Dimetrodon but this species isn't a redirect to Dimetrodon? Magnatyrannus (talk) 18:16, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Magnatyrannus because it has a unique description history and is relevant to Prince Edward Islanders, being heralded as the island's resident "dinosaur". Logosvenator wikiensis (talk) 00:18, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: That is why I put dinosaur in quotes. Logosvenator wikiensis (talk) 16:48, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why does this page exist?
Talk:Chief Election Commissioner of India

message: I congress changed its name to congress organization in March 1969 by the syndicate &Indra named it congress I on her expulsion. How the inc is running elections with its original name & symbol of congress I with no renewal is it legal? 2600:1700:F1E0:F980:A47C:DA41:4128:AA09 (talk) 09:00, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Laws to misleads the voters in the name of Indian National Congress started by A H Hume
Talk:James Michael Lyngdoh

message: I had pointed this to User:Soham321 earlier as well while editing Narendra Modi that as assembly is dissolved by the Governor and not by the Government. Government (Chief Minister) recommends the Governor and it is binding on him. There are few exceptions which may be referred from this case: Mahabir Prasad Sharma vs Prafulla Chandra Ghose. The actual power is in hands of the Government but legally and constitutionally the suggestion that Gujarat Assembly was dissolved by the Narendra Modi government. - Mohit Singh (talk) 23:21, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dissolution of Assembly 

message: There is an RfC on the question of using "Religion: None" vs. "Religion: None (atheist)" in the infobox on this and other similar pages. 
The RfC is at Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion. 
Please help us determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 19:46, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion|Request for Comments]] 
Talk:Assembly election results of Mizoram

message: Note:  Project Banner with Mizoram workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Mizoram or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  Amartyabag  TALK2ME 01:14, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Mizoram Addition
Talk:Bellusaurus

message: The skull pictured is a sculpt and is not based on any fossil material from Bellusaurus itself. I think that it would be best for the image to be removed.
Lythronaxargestes (talk) 19:19, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed, there isn't exactly much room anyway. FunkMonk (talk) 21:30, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image choice
Talk:Elections in Odisha

message: Note:  Project Banner with Orissa workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Orissa or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 06:32, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Orissa Addition
Talk:80–85

message: This album is out of print. In 2004 a Remastered version with a duplicate track listing was put out called 'How Could Hell Be Any Worse', not to be confused with their original 1982 release.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.157.158.161 (talk) 06:17, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Album is out of print {{resize|60%|({{Abbr|Posted without title|Title added by User:Askarion on November 26, 2023}})}}

message: A couple times when I went record shopping to look for any CD, it appears that this album is probably out of print. I was looking at some Bad Religion albums and on the "new" section, it didn't have 80-85. So, this is why I added the "out of print" reference to this article. Also, when I go to any other record store, the new section didn't have 80-85 either. 69.12.166.40 00:43, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Isn't this album out of print?
Talk:Bihariosaurus

message: I've provided the original description for Bihariosaurus as follows:
F. Marinescu. 1989. Lentila de bauxita 204 de la Brusturi-Cornet (Jud. Bihor), zacamint fosilifer cu dinozauri [Bauxite lens 204 from Brusturi-Cornet (Bihor Co.), fossil excavation with dinosaurs]. Ocrotirea Naturii si a Mediului Inconjurator 33(2):125-133.
The holotype of Bihariosaurus is rather fragmentary and thus is a nomen dubium (Posmosanu and Popa 1997; see Galton 2009 for an overview of ornithopod remains from the Early Cretaceous Bauxite beds of Cornet, Romania). 
Posmoşanu, E. T. & E. Popa (1997) - Notes on a camptosaurid dinosaur from the Lower Cretaceous bauxite, Cornet - Romania. Nymphaea, oradea, 23-25 : 35-44.
Galton, Peter M. (2009). "Notes on Neocomian (Late Cretaceous) ornithopod dinosaurs from England – Hypsilophodon, Valdosaurus, "Camptosaurus", "Iguanodon" – and referred specimens from Romania and elsewhere" (pdf). Revue de Paléobiologie 28 (1): 211–273. 68.4.61.168 (talk) 15:29, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference