lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Irina Ionesco

message: * Is she related to Eugène Ionesco ? 83.157.233.95 07:47, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Eugène Ionesco
Talk:In the Flesh (Roger Waters tour)

message: 2002 setlist is incorrect.  24.161.108.255 08:04, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is he, in fact, Michael Kamen's brother?  I know he is NICK Kamen's brother, but I can't find any mention of a blood relation between Chester and Michael (or Nick and Michael, for that matter).
Mike the Pharmacist (talk) 02:37, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Chester Kamen

message: I was at the Mars amphitheater (Florida) gig in 2000 and watched the intriguing array of guitarists doing the guitar break in Money. I have a feeling that Waters had the bright idea of getting some local talent in for each gig to perform their renditions of that break. Does anyone have any knowledge of exactly what was going on here, or was the blunt I was offered even better than I thought? --Matt Westwood 22:12, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guitar break in Money 

message: Due to the confusion between the 1999-2002 and the 1977 tour, the title was changed as "In the Flesh (1999-2002 concert tour by Roger Waters)". If this title is not adequate, please improve it. --Toksoz (talk) 20:28, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  The "<i>In the Flesh (tour)</i>" title improvement
Talk:Dawn chorus (birds)

message: "Audible radio waves" ??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.152.170.30 (talk) 08:12, 6 June 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I was hoping to find out why birds sing at dawn. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.0.115.164 (talk) 17:48, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm still hoping - made the above comment months ago. Why do birds bother? I heard on BBC Radio 4 once that the amount of energy used in singing is proportional to the spare energy the birds have in the morning - so a comparatively mild night would lead to more singing, a cold night less. Do bird brains really sing because they are happy to have survived the night - I dount very much they are capable of emotions like that. I suppose a human analogy would be drivers honking their horns when the dawn comes - why would they want to do that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.3.46.91 (talk) 22:59, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

text: A little Googling produces this link http://www.bl.uk/collections/sound-archive/listentonature/specialinterestlang/langofbirds3.html with another theory of the reason for the dawn chorus. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.3.46.91 (talk) 23:04, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why? 

message: I have just added three examples of non-avian animals that produce a dawn chorus.  There is insufficient detail on these for a stand-alone article so I have added them here. Should this article now be moved to Dawn chorus (animals)? — Preceding unsigned comment added by DrChrissy (talk • contribs) 12:34, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move article? 

message: # It is insufficient to claim that the D.C can also be heard in the U.S.A. when it is a known fact in many if not most areas of the world 
# This article should include more descriptive/encyclopedic information about the Dawn Chorus before going in to lical detail 
Who can improve this ?  (I might be able to add information, but I have no access to comprehensive references to justify any changes)
jw (talk) 20:34, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  More info please, about the Dawn Chorus itself
Talk:Solar Tower Buronga

message: __TOC__
The article World's_tallest_structures  says the Solar Tower Buronga is in NSW.
The present article says construction will start in Mildura.
Mildura is in Victoria, albeit right on the border with NSW.
Buronga is in NSW.
There is clearly something wrong here.
:The EnviroMission website says Buronga in Wentworth Shire. Early proposals were to build it near Cullulleraine in Victoria, I think. Hence the confusion. --ScottDavis 15:04, 21 July 2005 (UTC)

message: The Solar One plant referred to in Heliostat works on a totally different principal - the solar panels concentrate the sunlight on a collector which heats water to generate power. The Buronga plant, if built, will use hot air to turn the turbines mounted in the tower. --Dagdaireland 11 August 2005 
See Heliostat which has a discussion about another solar power plant that also claims to be the first and one that has been in operation for many years.  Vegaswikian 23:42, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Worlds first 

message: See Talk:Solar updraft tower Talk:Solar updraft tower/Archive 2 for much discussion of this particular proposal. Andrewa 03:07, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: See also
Talk:William E. Boeing

message: "Boeing blew up" may not be the best choice of words (in the introduction). Perhaps "Boeing became furious"? Typometer (talk) 01:11, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Just wondering here, was he born William Boeing, or was he born Wilhelm Böing? The text suggests his father was named Wilhelm Böing, and never states what William's original name was, until it mentions him anglicizing it.83.233.216.105 (talk) 02:24, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Concur. He could well have been born "William Edward Böing". We need a reilable source that specifically say s he was born "Wilhelm Eduard Böing". His first and middle names may have already been anglicized, as was common for many American-born children of European immigrants of that time period. My grandfather's parents also emigrated from Germany to the US in the late 1800s/early 1900s, and to my knowledge his name was always spelled William, even though he had an obviously German surname. - BilCat (talk) 21:31, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  I agree. I haven't found any evidence that he was born anything other that William Edward Böing, so I added a need citation template to that part of the sentence. Thellomerca (talk) 17:35, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed, as it was still unsourced after 2 and a half years. - BilCat (talk) 02:46, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Birthname
Talk:PSNA College of Engineering and Technology

message: The orphaned article P.S.N.A.College of Engineering and Technology appears to be a duplicate, or subset, of this one, so I suggest it be merged here. -- KenBailey (talk) 08:50, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: ~ I've MERGED the two articles under PSNA College of Engineering and Technology. It's the same subject. P.S.N.A.College of Engineering and Technology is now a REDIRECT to this one, but the lack of a space in the article title ("P.S.N.A.College of...") makes me think it's better to DELETE that page per Wikipedia:Article titles. Happy Editing! –pjoef (talk • contribs) 10:03, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal
Template talk:British Rail Locomotives

message: Out of interest, is there any reason this template doesn't make use of the Navigation template? --Dean Earley 16:31, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template:Navigation 

message: I have created a new design for the template. It can be found below. The benifits of it over the current design are that it is collapsible, it has the v-d-e function, the layout is clearer and the template takes up less space on the page. 
I would like to hear the thoughts of other people first, and have a consensus reached on whether it should be implemented. If you wish to make any changes to the design, then please make a copy of the template below, then modify it. This means the templates can be compared against each other. 
I have also made similar proposals on the related templates here and here. 
--Jorvik 20:25, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redesign proposal 

message: I was wondering if it would be a good idea to change the template's colour scheme to BR's Rail Blue (#0B4559) or a relevant variation thereof? The current wikipedia standard is acceptable, but a change may increase identifiablilty, whilst also (if done to all BR-related templates) unifying the templates under one theme. GARETHenterprises© 17:41, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change the colouring of the British Rail related templates to Rail Blue? 

message: The template lists two class 41 articles, one for the HST prototype and one for the unbuilt class. What about the early warship design? They were withdrawn long before the 42s and never carried TOPS numbers. Some info and a picture are here  (just under the Hymeks). Tom walker (talk) 08:46, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The early Warship design were never assigned a TOPS class. According to the TOPS article BR was introduced to TOPS in a 1968 presentation, the five early Warships were withdrawn in late 1967.  Therefore to call them class 41 is not accurate. 68.147.37.149 (talk) 06:04, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: See my reply to you at Talk:British Rail Class 41 (Warship Class)#Correct Page Title. --Redrose64 (talk) 21:29, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Class 41 warship 

message: If this is a navigation guide to British railway locomotives built after nationalisation, where are all the steam locos, especially the BR standards? Murgatroyd49 (talk) 10:04, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Steam locos
Category talk:Days

message: Dumb Format
What is with the dumb format on the individual days pages?
I mean like October 20, that makes no sense at all in the English language. Shouldn't it be 20th of October or at least October the 20th?
October 20 sounds like October of 1920, like it is the 20th in a list of Octobers not days within October. - Josquius
A response: I think the current convention is as good as any.  The most important thing, in my opinion, is consistency.  - Pomakis 16:49, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
Template talk:Weapon-firearm

message: What is the difference from Template:Firearm--210.82.118.225 08:07, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I fancy this one over Firearm, but then I would, but go see Template:Weapon which seems more consistent with Template:AFV, and will probably replace "firearm" and "weapon-firearm" GraemeLeggett 10:00, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the difference from [[Template:Firearm]] 

message: A possible resolution to the issues/concerns/whatever above could be to use some "qif"s in the template, such that is a field is not populated, it doesn't show up at all.  This would give everyone the option of using something like "Wars" and "Rate of fire" when deemed appropriate, but if the info was not filled in, it wouldn't show.  Check the source for the company infobox template for an example.  Just a suggestion. The Deviant 22:48, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  How about using "qif"s?
Talk:Rob Harris (skysurfer)

message: Article has been kept following this Votes for deletion debate. Sjakkalle (Check!) 10:48, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is "lensed" a word? Maybe a different word would be more suitable, like maybe "videoed"? Thoughts? Rklawton (talk) 02:39, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Lensed
Talk:Disaster recovery and business continuity auditing

message: This topic is the same is Business Continuity Planning, and the content should be moved there (as the more complete article with the more common name) Proto 10:57, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: However, I think this topic is about auditing business continuity plans, while "Business Continuity Planning" is more about the plans themselves. Group6 22:09, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Therefore it makes sense that this becomes a section of the main Business Continuity Plan article. Proto 08:21, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  One thing, I tried to get the BCP article raised to featured article status and failed pretty spectacularly.  One rather difficult criticism was that the BCP article was too much bullet point oriented and not prose-y enough.  Given the nature of BCP, bullet points are very suited.  Incorporating the content from this article into the BCP one, would be encourage more bullet points in the BCP article and even less prose.  That said, all the of the auditable criteria detailed herein should be explicitly added to the BCP article.  Whether or not the DR and BCP auditing page will have a purpose separate to the BCP page is a different matter.  I think there probably is merit to both.  Revmachine21 13:14, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Business Continuity Planning 
Talk:Spiders (System of a Down song)

message: Does anyone else hear the painfully obvious similarity between this song and Toxicity? The rhythm is almost exactly the same, the only difference is the lyrics. Einstein  runnerDingdong! 23:51, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Toxicity? 

message: Does anyone know the name of the girl who is shown throughout the video???? I'll Probably forget to check this daily or for a long time so if you can send the answer to my E-Mail it would be greatly appreciated, JustinCTHXC@yahoo.com if not just post the answer here, Thank you in Advance  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.235.178.56 (talk) 02:45, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Girl 

message: This article called SOAD a 'Heavy Metal' band and included a hyperlink to the heavy metal page. I changed it to just say 'metal band' because they very much are not heavy metal. IDK why people keep thinking all metal is 'heavy metal.' Heavy metal is the type that led zepelin and judas priest make, ironicaly the least "heavy" type of metal. 2A02:A468:6043:1:3125:BD3F:2FC3:C132 (talk) 15:13, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Metal
Talk:Danny Keough

message: This article needs to be sourced and the notability of this person should be established.--Fahrenheit451 23:01, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. I tagged it as non-notable. I also removed the Project Scientology box since his religion is not even mentioned in the article. Imagine if every Catholic had a Project Roman Catholic box on their bios. Steve Dufour (talk) 15:39, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  -- Expanded the article w/ (35) sources, expanded info on Scientology.  Cirt (talk) 00:04, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks Cirt. I am still not sure that he is a notable Scientologist however.Steve Dufour (talk) 02:27, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You are welcome.  Perhaps, perhaps not.  But he is notable as a person.  Cirt (talk) 03:07, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Article not sourced and person of questionable notability

message: I've divided the article into sections to make it more readable, but the current layout is probably awkward. Ideally, the article should be rewritten and/or rearranged to conform more closely with the Wikipedia formatting guidelines for biographies. Laval (talk) 15:08, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Sections
Talk:Tumen (unit)

message: Is there any specific reason (other than incorrect transcription from cyrillic) why the unit of 10 is named "arban" instead of "arvan"? The latter would be a correct representation of the Mongolian numeral "арван". I don't expect the word to have changed in the transition from the classic mongolian script. --Latebird 14:22, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As I've just learned, the classic spelling does indeed transcribe correctly to "arban". Old languages can be full of surprises... --Latebird 22:48, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  arban vs arvan 

message: Huns were not Turks, nor are Turks Huns. Therefore, Huns should not be called Proto-Turks.--218.19.102.5 (talk) 14:17, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: unfortunately, Wiki does not run on unsubstantiated ballyhoo - it requires Reliable Sources from knowledgeable scholars that do research - pity, that, eh? 20:34, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience

message: It appears user 194.83.138.251, at 12.02 on 21 Dec 04 borrowed the entirety of an article on the history of the Institute of Psychiatry from their in house magazine, Viewpoint, published late November 2004. The article starts on page 13 of the PDF. Found through using Google to look up some text.
--Coffeelover 11:29, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Aguinaldo, Ifugao

message: Article has been kept following this VfD debate. Sjakkalle (Check!) 11:31, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Total power exchange

message: There's no obvious reason why this needs the "(BDSM)" disambig so will move to correct location of Total Power Exchange as there is nothing at that title other than a redirect here (WP policy not to have bits on the end where not needed and not part of a project). --Vamp:Willow 11:32, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: done. all links sorted and TPE restructed / corrected too! --Vamp:Willow 11:43, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)

message: Regarding merging with 24/7 (BDSM), it would seem to me that's an aspect of TPE and therefore should be a section within here.  (Or to put it another way, is there any case where 24/7 lifestyle wouldn't fall under TPE?)  -RJFerret 08:14, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging?
Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Disambiguation pages

message: Please express an expert opinion in Talk:Qasr#Agreed: ONLY places called solely Qasr to be listed. The issue is whether two-part names, such as "proper_name + object_type", e.g., [[<something> Prison]] and the likes, belong to [[<something> (disambiguation)]]. - Altenmann >talk 21:00, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The guidance for this is at WP:PTM. --Joy (talk) 22:30, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Generic issue about dab page items 

message: The redirect Mos:Dp has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Utopes (talk / cont) 21:50, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Mos:Dp]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect Mos:DP has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Utopes (talk / cont) 21:51, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Mos:DP]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect Mos:Dab has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Utopes (talk / cont) 21:51, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Mos:Dab]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect Mos:DAB has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Utopes (talk / cont) 21:51, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Mos:DAB]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Portal talk:Aviation/Anniversaries/June

message: This page is basically an experiment on my part, but if people want to expand its thats great too. What i want is to have a piece on the Portal:Aviation page that works like the Selected anniversaries does on the Main page.I'm not sure if it's possible without a lot of /'s (subpages?).If anyone could help that would be great. Trevor macinnis 12:20, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting idea, but I think it might do better as a series of subpages under the aviation portal. It doesn't add new information that isn't already in the "year in aviation" pages. Thank you very much for explaining your experiment here! FreplySpang (talk) 22:15, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Great Exhibition

message: "Queen Victoria and her family visited 3 times!"
Maybe such an exclamatory statement of the fact is not necessary?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.235.58.2 (talk) 16:29, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Exclaimatory statement 

message: "...whilst radicals such as Karl Marx saw the exhibition as an emblem of the capitalist fetishism of commodities."
Since Das Kapital was first published in 1867 and it was not up until then that Marx introduced his concept of commodity fetishism, I'm wondering whether this statement is at all true.
If it is though, I think it would be a very interesting fact to document properly and without bias.
Karl Marx, one of the most influential philosophers of the 19th century, shouldn't have words put in his mouth so lightly while being dispatched as a simple "radical".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.195.7.190 (talk) 02:03, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source? 

message: Since 3 February 2009 this article has reported that there were over 13,000 exhibits.  This was cited to a website called victorianstaton.com which contained that information at least as early as February 2000, and through 2013, though the website may now be defunct, see .  An IP editor just tried to change the number to 100,000, claiming it came from his history textbook, which was reverted as unsourced.  See .  
I see a 1999 book reporting 100,000 and other sources saying 13,000 (1973 book:). So which is it?  I suspect there is some definitional difference as well as some sloppiness somewhere which has led to divergent reports.--Milowent • hasspoken 19:48, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of Exhibits 
Talk:BC Žalgiris

message: It should NOT be "Kauno" Žalgiris, because "Kauno" is an adjective in Lithuanian, and this is an English-language site. It is also best to avoid adjectives when not necessary; for example, "Arsenal F.C." is not called "Londoner Arsenal". "BC Žalgiris" is the official name of the club and how it is referred to throughout the world. --Dryazan 12:36, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Name of the page

message: firstly Sonny Weems is missing even though the edit page shows him for incoming players. Someone else put him in but I do not know hoe to correct it. Secondly there are numerous mentions of Fifa when I'm sure it is supposed to be Fiba.24.36.110.176 (talk) 03:26, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: FIBA not FIFA and missing players
Talk:Black cat (disambiguation)

message: The Case of the Black Cat is not an ambiguous title, and it does not require disambiguation from the other uses listed here. The Manual of Style for disambiguation pages states, "On a page called Title, do not create entries merely because Title is part of the name." An exception could be made if The Case of the Black Cat was also known as just Black Cat or The Black Cat, but I don't see any support for that in the article. As an unambiguous use, The Case of the Black Cat does not belong on the disambiguation page.--ShelfSkewed Talk 20:21, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Case of the Black Cat 

message: Temple of the dog also have a song named "black cat", though i dont know if it's a cover or if any of the others is a cover of it.
could anyone look into this and add it to the disambiguation page?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.69.68.216 (talk) 18:52, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The problem is, this song, which apparently was never officially released, is not mentioned in the band's article, or in any related article. A dab page is not the place to assert a use that is not supported by an article, so before it can be listed on the disambiguation page, it must be included in a Wikipedia article.--ShelfSkewed Talk 19:59, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: thanks, ive already posted a comment on the temple of the dog page  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.69.68.216 (talk) 23:58, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: temple of the dog song