Talk:Chickasaw Turnpike

message: #Is it reasonably well written?
#:A. Prose quality:  
#:: 
#:B. MoS compliance: 
#:: 
#Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
#:A. References to sources:  
#:: 
#:B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
#:: 
#:C. No original research: 
#:: 
#Is it broad in its coverage?
#:A. Major aspects:  
#:: 
#:B. Focused: 
#:: 
#Is it neutral?
#:Fair representation without bias: 
#:: 
#Is it stable?
#: No edit wars, etc: 
#:: 
#Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
#:A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
#:: 
#:B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 
#:: 
#Overall: 
#:Pass or Fail: 
#:: 
This article is beautiful. Hard to say there's any problems with it. It meets all criteria for GA status.Mitch32contribs 20:09, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good article review 

message: I'm pleased to close out the WP:USRD A-Class review as a promotion with 5 net supports (5 supports, 0 oppose). Imzadi1979 (talk) 05:29, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Promotion to A-Class

message: This article will appear as the selected article on the U.S. Roads portal for the month of August 2008. --CG was here. (T - C - S - E) 22:05, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I forgot - Isn't there a template for the top of talk pages that states what you just said?  Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 22:11, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Portal:U.S. Roads]]

message: If we can, three things should be fixed:
#The press release from the Oklahoma Legislature has a dead link. Ideally, we should find an archived copy someplace.
#Based on that release, we have a construction cost figure in the article. We need the year of reference for that value. The article previously used the Consumer Price Index tool from the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis to convert that to 2008 dollars. For capital expenditures such as this, we should use the US Nominal Gross Domestic Product per Capita index, which we can automatically generate using . However, we need the appropriate year of reference, which I set to 2002 for now based on the date of the press release.
#One of the news articles without an external link is missing a page number. If possible, that should be added to complete the citation.
Imzadi 1979 →  15:06, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Three fixes before TFA day 

message: Hello editors. My wife frequently suffers from insomnia, and one thing we've discovered is that reading from Wikipedia is an effective way of . . . boring her to sleep. To that end, I have been reading Wikipedia articles to her when she needs it and I've got a computer handy. Just after I finished reading List of common misconceptions, I had the idea that I could help out the community by recording the reading of the article, and contributing to the WP:SPEAK project. I plan on recording this article, soon (probably the next time she needs some help sleeping and I've got a computer). Don't expect an amazing reading, but it'll be something. I'm working under the assumption that something is better than nothing. McKay (talk) 04:13, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: It has been uploaded. McKay (talk) 04:39, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spoken Wikipedia 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Chickasaw Turnpike. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://archive.is/20070704010824/http://www.lsb.state.ok.us/house/news5819.htm to http://www.lsb.state.ok.us/house/news5819.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:43, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Looks like this older FA is in pretty good shape, although there are a couple spots that needs a slight-touchup.  There's a single sentence in the route description that lacks a citation that should be super easy to cite.  is sourced to a 2002 source - a more recent source would be nice to support the only two-lane turnpike, and a more recent source for usage figures would be nice, if available. Here's a 2014 source - I don't know where to hunt for a more recent one. A citation for the notes in the exit list would also be nice.
Overall, this is in pretty good shape.  Marking this as satisfactory at WP:URFA/2020, with this note. Hog Farm  Talk 00:16, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  FA notes