lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Cornell

message: copied from talk:Cornell University. 24.63.125.223 19:21, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm pretty confident that the vast, vast majority of people who would search for "Cornell" in wikipedia are looking for Cornell University. JDoorjam 17:05, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  That may be true, but I'm sure many people (perhaps even a "vast, vast majority of people") who are not familiar with them would also confuse the two institutions, thinking that Cornell College and Cornell University are related (as Harvard College is the undergraduate division of Harvard University). 24.63.125.223 17:42, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

text: I concur.  Only once in my many edits have I found a misdirect of "Cornell" to "Cornell University" when the link should have gone to "Cornell College". --Xtreambar 17:26, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I don't doubt that, but not all Wikipedia readers are informed editors who know the distinction between the two.24.63.125.223 17:42, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

text: You are missing my point. Let me try to explain it another way: the number of Wiki users who visit the Georgetown University page, seeking Georgetown College or the University of Georgetown is probably slight as well. Nonetheless, the clarifications at the top of those articles adds useful information that is relevant to the article, regardless of a user's intended destination. The purpose of an encyclopedia entry is to expand knowledge and such clarifications help in that regard. 24.63.125.223 19:09, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur, especially as I think this has become more so true almost 2 decades later. Kirby1016 (talk) 21:46, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Cornell" redirect/disambig
Talk:Residential area

message: Re adjective/noun: that's what I thought.. I've always heard it referred to as either a "residential zone" or "residential area". Perhaps the page should be moved to one of those titles? -- Hadal 09:42, 22 Mar 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: "he acts like a residential", i.e. one who unfamiliar with an urban area (aka "Resident"). Considering how stubby it is, I don't know that it matters, but residential has more than two links to it. Ronabop 10:22, 22 Mar 2004 (UTC)

text: It has to do with land use and zoning. A residential area is usually zoned to permit only dwellings; although, natural patterns of settlement may result in a residential area. Fred Bauder 16:34, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Achilles

message: The redirect Achillean has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  MikutoH (talk) 00:37, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Achillean]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: — Assignment last updated by Mythologicalcreature8817 (talk) 04:18, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: HUM 202 - Introduction to Mythology

message: — Assignment last updated by Lindseybean28 (talk) 21:25, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: College Composition II
Talk:Electromagnetic spectroscopy

message: In reply to Bensaccount: my feeling is that spm is more specific to near-IR/visible/near-UV and to the study of spectra in the narrow sense of the word. Time-resolved spectroscopy and fluorescence spectroscopy would not really fit. Anyway, this is a rough feeling, it is probably not an official definition. -- Hankwang 11:08, 22 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Spectophotometry vs. E.M. spectrometry

message: I removed the link to Wien's law, which was left dangling after this edit by Dkroll2 — seems to me that someone who knows his stuff might want to bring it back somewhere appropriate. Fbriere 21:08, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wien's law]] 

message: Should gamma nuclear spectroscopy be included in this article?  David R. Ingham 07:15, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gamma rays 

message: I have never heard of a class of spectroscopic techniques referred to as 'electromagnetic spectroscopy', and this article did nothing to clarify what such a class would consist of. The article refers to a variety of spectroscopic concepts and applications that are all already better explained elsewhere. I feel this article could be deleted and the term redirected to the Spectroscopy article.ronningt (talk) 21:21, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Propose Deletion
Talk:National Labor Relations Act of 1935

message: The article seems a little heavy on the legal framework and history of the legislation.  It provides little detail on how the act actually works in practice.  I recommend adding this component to it.
:Duly noted--we have added satellite articles on procedural issues. At some later point I'll try to give a rough outline of the practical impact of the law relating to unfair labor practices, to the extent that they are not covered under particular headings such as secondary boycott, but any summary will have to be once over lightly, given the complexity of the law in this area. -- Italo Svevo 22:08, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestion

message: I have edited the material below because the original was incorrect as to the NLRA. The main principles may be found in section 1, the policies and findings of the NLRA, being careful to identify those parts that were added in later amendments.Emunah Emet (talk) 17:40, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Principles of Wagnerism

message: Perhaps Longshoremen v. Allied Int'l, Inc. should be added to the infobox?--Goldsztajn (talk) 00:16, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Longshoremen v. Allied Int'l, Inc 

message: I believe the quote at the end of the "Exclusions" section is misleading and irrelevant.  This page is about the National Labor Relations Act of 1935, and the quote at the end of "Exclusions" is referring to the Social Security Act of 1935 - so it is irrelevant.  Moreover, the reference from which the quote is sourced concludes that the Social Security Act was NOT motivated by racism ("The author concludes that the racial-bias thesis is both conceptually flawed and unsupported by the existing empirical evidence."), so I think the quote is misleading.
I have read that the exclusions of the NLRA of 1935 WERE motivated by racist considerations (the NY Times recently stated this point-blank in an article about the United Farmworkers Union).  I was looking for evidence of this and stumbled on this page, which doesn't clear up the issue, for reasons mentioned. NYZack (talk) 21:01, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Racism
Talk:Bermuda

message: Diabetes is a big problem in Bermuda….how are they dealing with that??? 208.98.205.14 (talk) 05:21, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't exactly agree with your information on Bermuda because this article states that St. Georges is Bermuda's capital when St. Georges hasn't been since the late 1900's. Hamilton is the current capital. In no offense do I mean this letter. In addition, we Bermudians don't wear hula skirts and live off of coconuts. Bermuda is pretty much America but smaller and the beaches don't look like cement. 209.240.34.214 (talk) 16:33, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

text: If someone wants to take on 208.98.205.14's concern, this might be one place to start: https://www.paho.org/en/search/r?keys=diabetes%20in%20bermuda#gsc.tab=0&gsc.q=diabetes%20in%20bermuda Dgndenver (talk) 13:38, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diabetes in Bermuda 

message: Magna Carta doesn't require 'the' in front of it. See the Magna Carta talk page. I tried to change this, but my change was reverted. Random56653 (talk) 01:44, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I replied over at Talk:Magna Carta#Use of 'the' and italics when referencing Magna Carta. –Novem Linguae (talk) 02:00, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Magna Carta 

message: Shouldn't St. George's be the largest city in Bermuda? Hasayo (talk) 23:37, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Largest city
Talk:Clark hall pub

message: Sounds good to me... - Luckyluke July 2, 2005
*See discussion at Talk:Queen's University#Merging Clark Hall Pub and Grant Hall --pm_shef 01:07, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge into [[Queen's University, Canada]] ? 

message: Seems more appropriate.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.48.120.27 (talk • contribs) 00:51, 5 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why Not Merge into [[Queen's Faculty of Applied Sciences]] ?
Talk:Gerhard (cartoonist)

message: Has anyone ever thought what a strange answer Gerhard has to give when people ask him what he does for a living?  'Yeah, I draw the backgrounds for a black and white comic about a talking aardvark.  Oscar Wilde was in it, and once the aardvark became Pope.  No, the pay's not bad.'
My question is, how does he pronounce his name? Willbyr (talk | contribs) 16:29, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm assuming that's a short i, like in gift.  Thanks! Willbyr (talk | contribs) 23:42, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:United States congressional delegations from Arizona

message: This page's layout doesn't make any sense; the congressmen are listed alphabetically (they should be listed chronologically); and the dates listed are their birth/death dates (very confusing; the dates of their appointments would be much more appropriate--especially if positioned AFTER their office!)  Furthermore, the should be broken down by House and era (e.g. Territorial vs. Statehood). Iroll 17:48, 22 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lomonosov Gold Medal

message: "...the USSR Academy of Sciences and later the Russian Academy of Science..."
Same Academy or two different?  --Rj 17:48, Mar 22, 2004 (UTC)
:Same. See updatd artcl. Mikkalai 08:07, 4 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Old talk
Talk:Aldridge

message: Latest figure for population I can find is in 1981 (link off article); anywhere more recent? Matt 18:20, 22 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Population

message: Just to add Aldridge a village. Please stop adding false information. Thank you JoshuaIsTheFalco (talk) 17:04, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Constant editing
Talk:TRAC (programming language)

message: removed from article by Jerzy·t 06:32, 2005 August 17 (UTC):
:==External links==
*TRAC Foundation
As of 16 Aug 2005 this link gives:
 Gone
 The requested resource
 /
 is no longer available on this server and there is no forwarding address. Please remove
 all references to this resource.
And now it's been sucked up by a pornographer.  I'm disappointed that Calvin's children didn't keep his legacy alive.
I added back in a link to the last "good" version of that page archived at the Wayback Machine.64.196.90.242 (talk) 19:53, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken ext lk 

message: HOPL now runs out of hopl.info (Bruce Axtens, Librarian, History of Programming Languages) 180.216.77.145 (talk) 09:13, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  HOPL 

message: I created a TRAC T-64 implementation at https://github.com/gmilmei/trac64. Perhaps somebody tries it out and makes a link to it on this page.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.254.94.144 (talk) 08:52, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  TRAC T-64 implementation
Talk:The B-52's (album)

message: I've read that Cindy Wilson's and Kate Pierson's vocals so reminded Lennon of Yoko Ono's style that this album was a prime factor in luring the Lennons back into the studio after roughly five years hiatus. May or may not bear mentioning here. PurpleChez (talk) 21:52, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  John Lennon
Talk:Steven Hassan

message: There are 3 archives for this talk page:
* Talk:Steven Hassan/Archive 1 (2007-2023)
* Talk:Steven Hassan/Archive 8 (2021 & 2023)
* Talk:Steven Hassan/Archive 9 (2023 only)
I don't know how 8 & 9 got created, nor how to get them back into an appropriate sequence. If anyone knows how to do this (technical-wise), please can you repair the issue? Thanks.    ▶ I am Grorp ◀  03:21, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. And the duplicate threads in Archive 1 that were also in Archive 2 (formerly Archive 8) have been removed from Archive 1.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  12:05, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks for fixing that, SMcCandlish. I couldn't have done it (correctly). I've set the archive counter (above) from 9 to 3.    ▶ I am Grorp ◀  18:09, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archive mixup 

message: Is it not historically relevant and important to include that in 1976 Steven Hassan was "deserted" by the Unification Church? And that he was no longer a member of the church at the time of his "deprogramming"?
The book "Prison or Paradise" records these facts historically quoting Hassan directly and the book is cited as a credible source elsewhere in this bio. Doesn't this established fact add meaningful historical context to the "deprogramming"?Rick Alan Ross (talk) 16:49, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical Question 

message: https://culteducation.com/group/1379-steven-alan-hassan.html
Most of the material there is published by CEI (the org. founded by Hassan critic/competitor Rick Alan Ross, under one domain name or the other). But not being "neutral" source material (there really isn't any such thing) doesn't preclude all use of it within WP:DUE lines. And at very least it gives suggestions on what to look into in sources that are not connected to Hassan–Ross disputation.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  08:19, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  CEI's collected material on Hassan
Talk:Core competence

message: We currently have two articles on the same topic, Core competence and Core competency.
So, I'm putting one as a redirect to the other. I've chosen Core competency as the one to keep because:
* it's a lot older
* to me it reads better
But, I'll try and incorporate some of the text from Core competence into Core competency.
Below is the text of Core competence. --257.47b.9½.-19 21:15, 22 Mar 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Linear filter

message: I started some cleanup. The section looked rather out-of-date and did describe only one implementation method of one algorithm. The specialised article Digital filter should give the details, but this will some work. -- Pjacobi 16:44, 5 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Digital signal processing 
Talk:Growth rate (group theory)

message: Shouldn't the generating set T be required to be finite? Otherwise you end up taking logarithms of infinite cardinals (which is possible, but not with the ordinary definition of logarithm that seems to be assumed here). --Zundark 21:16, 22 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The growth rate is ok, but I realized that defs of polynomial growth and exp growth here are not exactly standard.
I want to fix it, but do not have books arrownd at the moment. (so I will make changes only in September) Tosha 12:42, 16 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Problem

message: The opening sentence says:
: 
: In group theory, the growth rate of a group with respect to a symmetric generating set describes the size of balls in the group.
: 
What are balls in a group? Michael Hardy (talk) 19:58, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's referring to metric balls in the word metric Kaoru Itou (talk) 01:10, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Balls
Talk:Fontanelle

message: The text mentions the posterior and anterior fontanelles, but the diagram indicates an occipital and frontal fontanelle. And it spells it "fontanel". I'm guessing the diagram is copied and pasted from some old text book and the terminology has changed since it was published.
Perhaps the diagram could be photoshopped to make the terminology consistent throughout the article? --DominicSayers 09:14, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The diagram is from Gray's Anatomy, and a more august source you really couldn't find - but these are fairly old plates, and terminology has indeed changed since.  If there are multiple spellings then the article should detail both; equally if things have new names then the article should reflect old and new.  That way someone coming looking with the old name in mind can learn the new one.  We can't realistically photoshop the gray's images, as there are over a thousand of them. -- John Fader 11:43, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discrepancy in terminology between text and diagram 

message: Quote: "Human beings are not the only mammals to struggle with birth defects." 
WTH? Its not a "DEFECT" its a feature that allows your head to grow to full size if it was all solid bone, human head would remain the size it is at the moment of birth. Also, im not sure this thing about "dogs" and their "feature" even belongs in tho this article.
80.220.201.10 (talk) 17:42, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "IN DOGS" 

message: Much more information can be added from Age of Closure of Fontanelles / Sutures. Interested editors may refer to this source.DiptanshuTalk 08:35, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  ref name CARTA
Talk:William Jackson Palmer

message: I don't know how to move an article, but the name of this article is now wrong, unless you know something I don't. His name was William Jackson Palmer, correct?
Punkche 22:20, 22 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Article naming

message: We need an article on Dr. William Bell, his partner who founded Manitou. Chris 21:27, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: requested article

message: "He hired Greenwood again as chief engineer in May, only to have Greenwood robbed and murdered on a survey near Mexico City"
This line isn't cited, so I couldn't verify, but I doubt Palmer had Greenwood murdered. I found a couple of obituaries from the time that made it sound like a random robbery and the killers were unknown. If the author of that section is still around, can you check your sources? Agatehawk (talk) 23:12, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greenwood murder
Talk:Table Mountain

message: Table mountains  was recently  burned Night Knight 801 (talk) 03:30, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Table mountains 

message: Tafelberg 41.150.212.52 (talk) 17:53, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Afrikaans 

message: The redirect Black Table has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Robert McClenon (talk) 16:10, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Black Table]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Academy Award for Best Adapted Screenplay

message: The books Crossfire: the Plot that Killed Kennedy & On the Trail of the Assassins are NOT novels but non-fiction books and should be listed as such.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.10.92.186 (talk) 01:02, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion 

message: The article doesn't address how this award is supposed to be judged. Is it intended to reward the film that is best-written (from among the nominees)? Or, is it intended to reward the screenwriter who was the most talented at adapting the film? So for example, let's say there's a movie that everyone recognizes as having the most ingenious plotting and dialogue of any movie ever made, but the movie was adapted from a play without changing very much, the play was already so good that the screenwriter hardly did any work, but then there's another nominee in the category where the movie is based on a great novel that everybody always believed to be unfilmable but then the screenwriter found a way to adapt it into a great movie such that the process of adaptation was clearly ingenious although the final script judged by itself as a script was merely great, not excellent. Mathew5000 (talk) 03:00, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  what is the award really for? 

message: This article is tagged for merging with Academy Award for Best Original Screenplay, but there doesn't appear to be any proposal outlining the rationale on either talk page. What would be the benefit of arbitrarily lumping together two separate awards, both of which already have very long articles? Ribbet32 (talk) 01:40, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: It seems that there were two years when original and adapted screenplays were lumped under the same award: 1929/30 (the 3rd awards) and 1948 (the 21st awards). An original screenplay won in 1929/30, and an adapted screenplay won in 1948. As it stands, we're not treating the two anomaly years in the same way, and I think we should. The 1929/30 award is listed on the Adapted Screenplay page (even though the winner was not adapted); it does not appear on the Original Screenplay page at all. By contrast, the 1948 award appears (without a note) on the Adapted Screenplay page and appears with an N/A nominee list on the Original Screenplay page.
My hunch is that the two anomaly years should appear in full on both pages, but the winner should be marked with a special diacritic (separate from the normal ‡) which indicates "winner of an award with both original and adapted screenplays as nominees." Thoughts? Johanna(talk to me!) 02:34, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The 3rd and 21st Academy Awards
Talk:Bad Company (album)

message: The song Bad Company, must be one of the only songs where the band name, album name and song name are all the same. The only other song like that I know is Black Sabbath.--Richy 15:06, 20 May 2005 (UTC)

message: I propose merging Can't Get Enough (Bad Company song) into this article.
WP:NMUSIC says, "Notability aside, a separate article on a song is only appropriate when there is enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged to articles about an artist or album."  While the song did chart at number 5, unless there is some reason to believe that there is more information available that could create more than a stub, we should simply merge this into Bad Company (album).  Qwyrxian (talk) 04:03, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: Not sure where it should go, but the link for "Ready for Love"  points to a German group Cascada.  I am assuming this is a BAD Company original and if Cascada did a remake it would point to Bad Comapany or Mott the Hoople, who ever did it 1st.  If Cascada made an original with the same name, then link should not exist.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.74.52.191 (talk) 20:11, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  incorrect Link 

message: June 26 is too late for the release date, since it was already the 10th best selling album in the UK in the June 15 album chart. I already changed it once, but it was changed back (without cite or comment), so I'm just going to leave this info here. PatConolly (talk) 22:52, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release Date
Talk:Prequel

message: Is there an alternative to "prequel"? That portmanteau bothers me. John Link (talk) 01:03, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternative to "prequel"? 

message: The Magicians Nephew cannot be the earliest prequel in literature, off the top of my head there is an example from 1952, The Crown of Violet, a prequel to The Hills of Varna.  There may well be other examples. PatGallacher (talk) 12:46, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Earliest prequel
Talk:Yevgeny Mravinsky

message: Which of 5, 6, 8, 9 and 10 are the "three" symphonies premiered by Mravinsky?
This reminds me of the famous old schoolboy howler: "Beethoven wrote 3 symphonies, the 5th, the 6th and the 9th".
JackofOz 00:53, 23 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is there a good reason why we spell it it "Evgeny" in the title? (It's "Yevgeny" in the lede, btw).  WP:RUS says that E (Russian letter) is romanized as "E", except at the start of words, when it becomes "Ye", and gives Boris Yeltsin as an example of what to do.  --  JackofOz (talk) 06:43, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No objections (or even comments), so I've moved it.  --  JackofOz (talk) 21:26, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Evgeny vs. Yevgeny