lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of high schools in Arizona

message: Some schools with no current data I can find have been removed as of mid-February 2012:
*Cornerstone Christian Academy. The most recent item I can find that mentions the school is from April 2010 in the local newspaper, and a directory listing from June 2009 includes a non-working website. I suspect this one closed quietly. The school is located with a church, and the church site makes no reference to any school but Sunday school.
*Phoenix School of Academic Excellence. The ASBCS has a log of closed charter schools from 2006 to 2010. This one says "Merged with another school site."
*Humanities and Sciences. This just doesn't quite fit right.
*E-Institute now says "various locations". It has Deer Valley, Grovers (Glendale), Metro (near Metrocenter mall), Surprise, Buckeye, Avondale, and Tempe branches. In addition, the name is now styled correctly. Raymie (t • c) 19:55, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removals 

message: I've gone through this article and cleaned up the entries that were external links to schools. This list now complies with WP:LISTORG. New entries should have a either an independent reference or an existing Wikipedia page. Philipnelson99 (talk) 01:09, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean-up and new entries
Talk:Churubusco Jr. - Sr. High School

message: Is the motto on the page really the motto? Because if so it needs citation, and it seems pretty negative.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by T-Money92 (talk • contribs) 20:10, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Motto 
Talk:Geography of Vatican City

message: I tried to clean the page up a little bit so that it did not look so much like (what it was) a direct import from the CIA.—MJCdetroit 13:00, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleaned up a little from CIA import version 

message: Hardly the most reliable source of information, but is it true that as claimed in Angels and Demons, that the square has been a bone of contention between the Vatican and Rome, and that Rome has periodically laid claim to it? --MacRusgail (talk) 19:27, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  St Peter's Square, disputed territory? 

message: Is there any point on having Natural resources and Natural Hazards sections in the article? All they say is that there is no resources or hazards. I think its a bit pointless having them there. Ross Rhodes (talk) 13:45, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Un-needed sections
Talk:Arizona Music Educators Association

message: This article appears to be of an appropriate length for the subject matter under discussion. It is also appropriately categorized and wikified. 
By nature, stubbing and tagging articles devalues them, giving them an aura of unreliability. As part of my personal campaign to free up articles that have been stubbed and tagged without cause, this article has been disenstubified. 
If any editor disagrees, and would rather re-stub it than improve it by adding actual content, please discuss here. The Editrix 15:07, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  De-stubbed
Talk:Chandler High School (Arizona)

message: Given the Wolves' football championship this year, anyone feel like dropping in info on CHS athletics?  I'm otherwise occupied or I'd do it myself.  (Plus I'm not exactly an unbiased reporter here (CHS '97 but didn't actually letter in any sports LOLOL). Cheers and Wolfpack Pride from Austin, Texas! 
-- Miwa * talk * contribs ^_^  23:14, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Athletics, anyone?
Talk:Wai khru ram muay

message: Please bear in mind, that the Wai Khru ceremony is not only limited to muay thai, but is an important ceremony held each year to "pay respect to the teachers". See here  ore here . --hdamm 13:09, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah!!  Thank you for pointing that out.  I was going to suggest that the Wai Khru have an individual entry to emphasize its function outside of the context of Muay Thai!!.  Noiseman433 21:41, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

text: See here: Thai greeting. --hdamm (talk) 09:13, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wai Khru 

message: I totally agree that this article should be merged with the Ram Muay article.  They cover practically the same content. Patiwat 05:42, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article merger
Talk:Staten Island Yankees

message: What is this teams pre-Staten Island franchise history?  It is NOT the Oneonta Yankees (which was the NY Penn team that the Yankees were affiliated with before moving to Staten Island).  The Oneonta franchise remains in Oneonta, now affiliated with the Tigers.
Were the 1999 SI Yankees an expansion team?  I think that needs to be addressed in this article.
Milchama 11:28, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  SI Yankee lineage? 

message: The team logo posted is incorrect, there should be the text Staten Island underneath the Yankees text.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 153.2.247.33 (talk) 12:28, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: A look around their website shows no use of the "Yankees" script logo. The Uncle Sam on bat logo seems to be the actual logo. I have changed the infobox logo image accordingly. NatureBoyMD (talk) 19:47, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Team Logo
Talk:RAF Bassingbourn

message: I could not locate a definitive source for the history of this station. The article reflects details gleaned from a variety of text and visual sources. Havelaar's book was excellent for its aerial photographs of Bassingbourn. Roger Freeman provided details of Class A standards and construction dates. The RAF squadron history acted as a "reverse directory" for details on the base. The ATF Bassingbourn website was invaluable for gelling it all together and I hope someone will do a related article on ATF Bassingbourn (I don't know if I can do it justice, although I am fascinated by a regiment that targets basic training specifically for 16-year-old recruits). I do want to give credit to the 91st Bomb Group Association web page. On its extensive page of stories about the 91st was an article by Kathleen Dodkin, who was a secretary for John Laing & Son during the building of the airfield in 1937-38.--Buckboard 13:13, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The best source is Bassingbourn (Airfield Focus No 2) by Hamlin, John F. and Simons, Graham M. Publ. GMS Enterprises, Bretton, Peterborough, UK. 1992. Yes, it's a book you have to find in a library. Sorry, I don't have a copy.--Lidos (talk) 08:40, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: Thanx for the photographs--they add much to the article. However their captions were incorrect in a number of ways and were corrected. BTW, the first number of the serial number on the tail is the year, i.e. 231909 is (19)42-31909.--Buckboard 06:23, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Photos

message: I addded a link to 94th_Bombardment_Wing_(World_War_II) but this page 3.2 refers to it as a Group? Which is correct?--Lidos (talk) 08:36, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  94th Bombardment Group
Talk:WFUN (AM)

message: This article is nothing more than a puff advertising scribble for the current station going by these call letters and about which there is nothing special or noteworthy. This present article should be deleted or modified to show that WFUN-AM in broadcasting history belongs to the station in Miami, Florida which supplied the djs and format ideas for Swinging Radio England and helped to create the sound of the "Swinging Sixties". That station does have a history of note and this current entry is but a joke inserted into Wikipedia like free advertising. There is a wealth of broadcasting history about WFUN in Miami that is worth reporting and knowing.
:Comments such as indicating that the current WFUN is "non-noteable" do not conform to Wikipedia's NPOV. The radio station currently broadcasting on 970 kHz is noteable to those in the radio industry and listeners in northeast Ohio and northwest Pennsylvania.  The station's history dates back to the early 1940s, and it even spawned a television station during the 1950s when UHF stations like it were doomed. The article otherwise conforms others created for Wikipedia:WikiProject Radio Stations, although it is a stub and it should be expanded.
:The history of WFUN in Miami is important, but its detail doesn't belong here.  It belongs in the article on WAXY.  Please note that the current Wikipedia naming convention states: "Where a station has changed call signs, please put the station's entire history in its current call sign".  See Wikipedia:Naming conventions#North America. There is no article on WAXY.  I suggest that you write an article on the history of the radio station on 790 in Miami.  This should include the rise and fall of WFUN there, the change to WNWS and the present-day WAXY.--Hillrhpc 03:40, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Paseo de la Reforma

message: This section needs to be expanded. I moved some of its content to the "Today" section because it seemed to belong more there. It should have the main buildings, styles and more info. Carlosr chill 00:26, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Architecture

message: I think Reforma is the longest avenue in the world. There should be some mention of this in the article. A source is needed though.
Paseo de la Reforma is not even the longest avenue in Mexico City. Carlosr chill 06:48, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Longest Avenue

message: "This wide avenue runs in a straight line, cutting diagonally across the city"
— northeast-southwest or northwest-southeast ? --Jerome Potts (talk) 07:49, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bearings 

message: Should we create :Template:Paseo de la Reforma to display entries in :Category:Paseo de la Reforma? ---Another Believer (Talk) 23:26, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: If they are allowed to coexist, yes. (CC) Tbhotch™ 05:15, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure, same as Template:Pearl District, Portland, Oregon and :Category:Pearl District, Portland, Oregon for example. ---Another Believer (Talk) 13:22, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

text: temple sarvy 2001:4490:4885:5E22:55E5:44AE:7760:DDCC (talk) 07:03, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Navigation template
Talk:Harrisongs

message: Looking at the list in Category:Music published by Harrisongs, it appears that every single GH song from 1969 onwards is categorised as a Harrisong. Perhaps this has come about from cutting & pasting categories from one song to another, but it's just not correct, of course − "Sue Me, Sue You Blues" and "Try Some, Buy Some" from the LITMW album were published by Harrisongs, as was "So Sad" from Dark Horse, but rights for the rest of LITMW's songs were with The Material World Charitable Foundation, and the other GH songs on Dark Horse as well as all his compositions until Brainwashed (I think) were published by the Ganga/Oops set-up (ie, dependent on territory). I've added mention in this article that Material World Charitable Foundation was administered by Harrisongs Ltd, as stated on LITMW cover artwork, and because of that administrative link I've also retained (or reinstated) in relevant LITMW song articles the category Music published by Harrisongs category − not totally accurate, I realise. But is there some way of fixing the appearance of each and every post-'69 song in the list, globally, so that none of those Ganga/Oops (now Umlaut) titles are included, does anyone know?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by JG66 (talk • contribs) 00:55, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect inclusion of post-1973 George Harrison songs as "Harrisongs" 
Talk:Charan Singh (disambiguation)

message: The previous Charan Singh (guru) article was deleted after being a copyvio. Thus, I've reverted the redirect back to a disambiguation page, and I'll create a stub for Charan Singh (guru) for now (since I don't know much about the topic), and let someone who has better sources give more information about it.
Arun 13:22, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Possibly. I didnt know it had been deleted. However, I do not think that the majority of links to Charan Singh, either now or as the India-related content on WP grows, will be to the Radha Soami Satsang guru. So I am going to put in a link on top of the PM Charan Singh article to the stub for Charan Singh (guru). Hornplease 17:42, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mount Graham International Observatory

message: The sentence: The only significant Telescope on the mountain (the Large Binocular Telescope) is still not operational after decades. has GOT to be removed, since the  Submillimeter Telescope is clearly significant. Disagree and revert my other edits if you must, but there's no way you can get away with that one. Either way it doesn't matter, the LBT is partially operational now and will soon be completed. 67.82.47.139 22:28, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Erroneous Statement 
Talk:Mount Graham

message: "Since a determination by the Keeper of the Register in 2002, Dził Nchaa Si An, as it is known in the Western Apache language, ranks as the largest and most extensive (~330,000 acres) property listed on or formally determined eligible for the National Register of Historic Places."
Hardly. The Adirondack Park and Cape Krusenstern National Monument and Archeological District, both designated National Historic Landmarks and thus listed on the Register, are larger. Daniel Case (talk) 20:11, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error 

message: This may turn into relevant information, either for this article or for one of the observatories:  Power~enwiki (talk) 00:02, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fire
Talk:The Grateful Dead (album)

message: Is this song derived from Rollin' and Tumblin' by Gus Cannon? J04n (talk) 17:03, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It comes from a rendition of New Minglewood Blues by Noah Lewis' Jug Band. This song, along with Sitting On ... and Viola Lee Blues, were highly admired by the band in their beginning years, especially by Garcia. These would be "re-imagined" version when played by the band. In later years, their version of Minglewood would change again, be retitled as All New Minglewood Blue and was on their album Shakedown Street. -- moe.RON Let's talk | done 19:14, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New, New Minglewood Blues 

message: Couldn't one say that this version was directly influenced by Junior Wells version with Buddy Guy. They sound more similar to each other than this one does with the original.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.65.72.233 (talk) 23:13, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good Morning, Little Schoolgirl 

message: / edg ☺ ☭ 19:32, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contemporary review 

message: The album also displays large blues influences, and much of it can be seen as being "blues rock." Various sources describe the music as sich, including Allmusic.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.105.147.206 (talk) 21:29, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre addition
Talk:Cumulus Media Networks

message: Can i suggest that this page is moved to ABC Radio (United States) and this become a disambig. This is what was done with ABC Kids. The bellman 13:36, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I suggest that we not. After all, ABC Radio shows in Australia are often labeled 'Radio National.' Besides which, it may be a moot point after the upcoming merger. —Joseph/N328KF (Talk) 14:28, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  ABC Radio AU/US 

message: I have removed the statement "'ABC Radio is a radio broadcasting unit branded by the American Broadcasting Company" and replaced it with "ABC Radio is a broadcasting unit of Citadel Broadcasting Corporation". The American Broadcasting Company has absolutely nothing to do with ABC Radio anymore, Though The Walt Disney Company is a minority owner (Less then 5%) in Citadel Broadcasting all operations and programming are done by Citadel. As far as the ABC Radio trademark is concerned I believe that in the agreement between Disney and Citadel, Citadel has the perpetual right to use the ABC circle logo without further compensation. Simon Bar Sinister 19:35, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion of edits by [[User:Simon Bar Sinister|Simon Bar Sinister]] 

message: This article should be renamed as above because that is the proper name of the subject of the article. Unless someone provides a strong and cogent reason not to so I will do the move shortly. Albatross2147 (talk) 03:25, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  ABC Radio Networks 

message: The list of ABC-owned stations really should be split into a separate List of radio stations owned by ABC. Given that it is solely a list of stations that have been owned or managed by ABC in some form, including the post-2007 holdings comprising just ESPN Radio and Radio Disney stations (since this article is about what eventually became Citadel Media and then Cumulus Media Networks, the stations that stayed with Disney/ABC after the sale of the non-Radio Disney/ESPN stations and networks to Citadel aren't exactly on-topic here), and its significant size, such a split seems overdue. (There's a few other updates that happen to be needed too, but that's another matter.) --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:50, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split proposed
Talk:Sharjah FC

message: The website of the team is Sharjah Club, and according to UAE Football League official site, it is Al-Sharjah Sports Club as Football just a section of the club. http://www.uaefa.ae/emir_clubs.php
Matthew_hk tc 10:58, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: I need to play from Sharjah fc 94.200.3.4 (talk) 16:13, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  How can I join this club
Talk:Alejandrina Cox incident

message: MILH , would you please follow WP:MOS? ☆ CieloEstrellado 02:26, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Following WP:MOS

message: Beyond its lack of a neutral POV, the problem with this article is the language used. It's not encyclopedic. The article's writing is great for a miscellaneous magazine, but not for an encyclopedia, where the writing is more fact-based and less colorful. ☆ CieloEstrellado 17:00, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The problem with this article
Talk:Ian Collins (footballer)

message: I'm not so sure that the "OAM" should be in the article name. Wikipedia articles dont tend to place distinguishments like Dr or Sir in front of names, so why OAM? Also, most OAM recipient articles dont include it (see :Category:Members of the Order of Australia). Thoughts? Remy B 13:45, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I thought it sounds better than Ian Collins (businessman and Australian rules footballer)...because it wasn't just in one area that he was notable. Rogerthat Talk 00:20, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think Ian Collins (businessman) would be a suitable disambiguation. I dont think anyone would want us to list every occupation in the article name. Remy B 08:32, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening heading 

message: Hi! I've been able to source most of the article, but I don't have a specific source for the break he had due to injuries in 1970. If anyone has something for that it would be neat if they could add it. :) - Bilby (talk) 04:38, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Referencing
Talk:Chiricahua Mountains

message: added history section but it needs lots of work and expansion.
BAlvarius (talk) 16:50, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: "Citation Needed." I grew up there and I've neither seen nor heard of armadillos anywhere near the Chiricahuas. Iroll (talk) 21:06, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Armadillos

message: Hi, Your page is good. And her is what I think you should change: 
if your put the graphs in one side. 
have a numbered figures. 
refer to hour figures in the text.
Sadeghm2010 (talk) 22:46, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Class
Talk:Superstition Mountains

message: "Ka-Katak-Tami " crooked top mountain  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.98.239.123 (talk) 22:18, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment 

message: Most articles on significant mountains explain the geology of the area, what type of mountains they are, how old they are, but there is nothing here. 
There is also no reference to whether the mountains are open for recreational use, what kind of limitations there might be, etc. 
This information would really enhance this article. Newjerseyliz (talk) 12:11, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geology? 

message: Can the usual bureaucrats please stop removing this nickname please, this is one of the local nicknames for the mountain range.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.151.87.162 (talk) 16:33, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Soups
Talk:Santa Rita Mountains

message: On this article is clearly says at the top that the Santa Ritas' Mount Wrightson is the tallest in the Tucson area (some 9,400 feet) while the Santa Catalina Mountains article says that Mount Lemmon is the highest in the Tucson area (9,100 feet). Can somebody correct this, I dont consider myself to be the best person to do it. I think it is more of a matter of perspective, rather than a mistake, being that Tucson begins at the base of the Catalins while the Santa Ritas are at the other end of the valley, 40 miles from Tucson. Thanks--$1LENCE D00600D (talk) 23:19, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Contradiction
Talk:Option time value

message: Since theta is (according to the Greeks:
*The theta measures sensitivity to the passage of time (see Option time value). \Theta is minus the derivative of the option value with respect to the amount of time to expiry of the option, \Theta = -\frac{\partial V}{\partial T}.  
the following sentence seems confused.  
"Note that theta does NOT reflect the sensitivity of the time value to the amount of time to expiry."
I think there's something behind it, but...
---------
Yeah, especially since the text states that
"Time value is simply the difference between option value and intrinsic value. Time value is also known as theta, or extrinsic value"
Theta is the sensitivity to the time to maturity. This is not the same thing as time value as it is defined in this text. I originally thought that 'time value' did indeed just refer to theta and went to check it here on wikipedia. Now I don't really know which is which, so I'm not comfortable updating the text. I think it's clear, though, that the text both defines time value as theta and as the part of the option value that is not intrinsic. So, yeah, the text is wrong and should be changed.
Willi5willi5 (talk) 12:30, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed sentence

message: The graph at the bottom right had "at time value t" in the title.  Both axis have the units of dollars however.  Is this just meaning "at any time t"? 
Techphets (talk) 13:20, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Question about graph title

message: Does the option graph only demonstrate IV as related to a call option? If so it should be labeled as such.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.98.45.142 (talk) 22:36, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Option Graph Question 

message: TV does NOT decay exponentially.  In fact NOTHING decays exponentially to zero. An exponential decay asymptotically approaches zero but never "gets there". TV is typically approximately equal to the square root of the time remaining to expiration.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Humanzgnome (talk • contribs) 17:13, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  NOT an exponential decay
Talk:Crusade in Jeans

message: I can read  that the person who made this article was clearly based on the 2006's movie. Isn't "Dolf Vega" it's Rudolf Hefting, in the book.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.148.125.69 (talk) 16:21, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong, Wrong
Talk:San Servolo

message: Much of the first version of this article is a translation from http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Servolo, though I could not verify a couple of sentences, so I left them out.  
Documentation for the "Ma ti xe de S. Servolo?" (Are you from S. Servolo?) bit:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.econ/browse_frm/thread/9607345e898ee1dd
Broken image link corrected. --Jo Rossi (talk) 16:56, 13 July 2010 (UTC)