lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Falsity

message: * Support — Appears to be a good idea at the moment. Right now this article gives short shrift to the logical and factual meanings, with a bulky list of ethical infractions, some of them borderline or outright specious, e.g. "prying into the correspondence of others", which would seem more antithetical to honour or trustworthiness than to truth. Of course, if the antonym section of Truth grows beyond a certain size it will be time to split it out again.
:One example of factual falsity would be a musical string whose overtones do not ring true with the fundamental note. "Truth" in this case is physically impossible to attain, although most newly manufactured strings come close enough for all practical purposes. __ Just plain Bill (talk) 20:03, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, the emancipation of dissonance, where no tone rings ever really rings true, and all music is falsity.HkFnsNGA (talk) 19:01, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

text: Oppose - There may be more to falsity than can fit into a truth article.  But then, I was one of Alonzo Church's students, and I may have a "warped" perspective.  For example, "warped" would be better discussed under "falsity", than "truth".  I suggest asking the merge question at the "truth" talk page to get more opinions.HkFnsNGA (talk) 18:59, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Truth 

message: On 6 January 2019 at 13:33, the first line 'Falsity (from Latin falsitas) or falsehood is...' was changed to 'Falsity (from Latin falsitas) or vonkwo gist is...' - I've never heard of 'vonkwo gist' and can't find any other reputable reference to it online. Since it's survived a number of revisions, is there anything to it?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.174.8.204 (talk) 16:17, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Vonkwo gist'?
Talk:Zahar Omar Hamis Bin Hamdoun

message: These links to the page numbers within the OARDEC documents may be useful to other contributors.  Geo Swan (talk) 20:55, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Another useful source is the The Guantanamo Docket it is an interactive database provided and updated by the New York Times. The database is searchable and has the Pentagon documents (CSRT and ARB) included. Additional documents and reliable New York Times research regarding the detainees at Guantanamo are also provided. This is the link to the documents and research regarding Zahar Omar Hamis Bin Hamdoun. IQinn (talk) 12:50, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  rough work 
Talk:Balkan Pact

message: You said rv good faith edit, not sure why you have added "history of Athens" here. Athens is not mentioned in the article. But I think everybody knows that. If you suspected that, at least you could use . I'll be happy if you can behave more constructively. Thank you. Takabeg (talk) 09:03, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Welcome to the real world Takabeg. I had never heard of a  tag and I could not think of a more polite way to rv that edit. I could not behave more constructively. Moreover, I still don't understand why it is worthy of inclusion in to history of Athens. So what if the treaty was signed in Athens. Big deal!  Nipsonanomhmata  (Talk) 23:39, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Balkan Pact
Talk:James T. Vaughn Correctional Center

message: It is located in the Philadelphia project because New Castle County is in the Philadelphia area.
WhisperToMe (talk) 21:01, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Delaware Court of Chancery

message: I have revised the entry to acknowledge that the reforms in England were prompted in part by the abolition of the New York Court of Chancery in 1847. More detailed investigation would be needed to confirm whether other American states abolished their Courts of Chancery between 1847 and 1873, or whether they did indeed follow the English reform.Ntmr (talk) 11:37, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  History of Courts of Chancery 

message: The court expanded to seven total (one chancellor, six vice chancellors) several years ago. I don't know how to edit, but here are some sources:  
https://technical.ly/civic-news/court-of-chancery-expands-for-the-first-time-since-89/
https://courts.delaware.gov/chancery/judges.aspx
https://www.delawarepublic.org/politics-government/2018-09-20/two-court-of-chancery-judicial-nominees-announced
https://courts.delaware.gov/aoc/annualreports/fy18/doc/AnnualReport2018.pdf (bottom of pdf page 7, marked as page 5) 68.81.43.93 (talk) 17:34, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for flagging this problem. I've updated the article. You have the ability to edit the article directly – see Wikipedia:FAQ/Editing for help, and be bold! Adumbrativus (talk) 02:52, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The Court has one Chancellor, who is the chief judicial officer of the Court, and four Vice Chancellors."
Talk:Helms Athletic Foundation

message: If the Foundation started in 1936 why are records from 1901 being included? In the John Wooden thread there is a statement that he won the Helms Foundation basketball championship with his team in 1932. Isn't it more accurate to say these schools were NAMED later?
Was there a predecessor or predecessor name for Helms dating back to 1932?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.214.92.242 (talk) 00:16, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questioning data for this entity before its founding in 1936 

message: Can anyone make a list of all the basketball champions named by the Helms Athletic Foundation from 1901 to 1938 (the years before the NCAA tournament).  I searched all over the internet and could not find a list.  If you could just point me to a source I will go ahead and do all the work, if you would prefer it that way.  Thanks. Seancp 16:43, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Got this from a blog, so it needs to be properly sourced.  Don't ask me what the asterisks mean: Hoof Hearted 21:46, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  This looks like the reliable source of the list, and confirms what the blog said.  I'll go ahead and add it.  Hoof Hearted 13:43, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of all Helms basketball champions from 1901 to 1938? 

message: Jon Scott is a subject-matter expert in college basketball history, in particular University of Kentucky basketball. He publishes a website, BigBlueHistory.net, which is a container for a very large amount of his work. An internet search for “Jon Scott” and Kentucky basketball turns up numerous instances, including major newspaper accounts, of his work being cited, not only for its accuracy, but also for its premier status as the foremost and most exhaustive compilation of its kind. His website is not a fan blog or a blog at all. Self-published expert sources may be considered reliable when produced by an established subject-matter expert, which Jon Scott clearly is. At the particular web page cited in this article, Scott also acknowledges collaborations with other reliable experts Phil Porretta, Patrick Premo, NCAA head statistician Gary Johnson, the LA84 Library (which holds the former records of the Helms Foundation) along with “numerous other historians”. Jeff in CA (talk) 03:16, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jon Scott is an established subject-matter expert
Talk:Ballot Act 1872

message: "Status: Repealed"
It obviously isn't, at least in the sense that its provisions carry on today in some law or other. This article and others relating to the same situation should really read "Status: Superceded". Harfarhs (talk) 17:23, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The usage of repeal in this article is correct and is supported by multiple reliable sources. If you have sources to support the usage of superseded as a status of UK legislation then please provide them. Road Wizard (talk) 21:59, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Status
Talk:Family court

message: Does anyone know to what extent this page should go into detail about family court. Also should it include examples of many countries, as I've noticed there are pages for family court systems in specific places. MasteroftheWord (talk) 15:14, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It would be helpful to add some information about how family court has allowed officials to ignore family violence and rather have it be considered a "family matter" Warnerlm1 (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Only if you have reliable sources for such an assertion. --Orange Mike | Talk 00:00, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Details
Talk:Saifullah Paracha

message: Replaced transcluded image with inline image -  tag as per dispute on Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption. Geo Swan 14:01, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replaced transcluded image with inline image - {{tl|npov}} tag as per dispute on [[Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption]] 

message: I removed this unreferenced section  from the page because of BLP issues. Can be added back when referenced. IQinn (talk) 09:10, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  unreferenced section 

message: It seems like the section on heart surgery ought to be expanded. As it stands, the section is a single sentence and a source. The details of the surgery might be added. Alternatively, the section, or single sentence as it were, might be collapsed into another section, although it isn't obvious what section is appropriate for containing health information of this type. GeoffreyZanders (talk) 08:23, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heart Surgery
Talk:Delegata potestas non potest delegari

message: When it is said that this principle subsists in the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom: there are in fact two jurisdictions in the United Kingdom, that of Scotland and that of England and Wales (which encompasses Northern Ireland, and is generally followed in the overseas territories).  Does the principle apply to both?  The article should make this clear.  Deipnosophista (talk) 19:59, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: United Kingdom

message: Should there be some reference to subrogation here? In continental jurisdictions subrogation is allowed for powers of attorney. Everybody got to be somewhere! (talk) 20:42, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subrogation
Talk:Delegation (law)

message: Does this article relate to a particular jurisdiction? Is it US law? Are there material differences between different jurisdictions? It's hard to find any info on delegation as a legal concept, so I would be very grateful for any further explanation from those who know. Thanks. Westmorlandia (talk) 12:16, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jurisdiction? 

message: Hello, I am employed by Boston University's Fineman & Pappas Law Libraries. After reviewing this Wikipedia page, I believe that information from one of our faculty's scholarship might provide a valuable addition to this page. I would appreciate it if this requested edit could be reviewed.
Add to end of Administrative Law section: Concerns often arise when law-making powers are delegated to agencies in administrative law because of agency heads are not elected by the people.  However, there are many times when delegating law-making authority to an agency is appropriate, especially when the legsilature lacks the capacity or expertise to handle a randomly evolving issue that affects multiple jurisdictions 
Cf2022 (talk) 18:26, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Would you mind fixing the ref by using a canonical name per WP:REFNAME, as they are both the same citation? Alternatively you can indicate the page number, if that's suitable.  It improves readability and user-experience, while keeping the References section shorter.  Thank you ! Ferkijel (talk) 07:51, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some Proposed Changes
Talk:Delfina and María de Jesús González

message: I am puzzled why this Mexican related article has been assigned to the WikiProject United States rather than WikiProject Mexico. I have now added the latter WikiProject but suspect it should be removed from the former. Can anyone explain why not? Is the original assignment a mistake? - Cameron Dewe (talk) 23:53, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject membership
Talk:Family law in Japan

message: The section "Background" is digressing from the subject: Family law of Japan. I think this is to be deleted. 
The modern Ie system (since Meiji era) is no more a background of family law of Japan after drastic postwar revision in 1947. A family register system can be traced back to over a thousand years before the modern Ie system. 
This section comes from Ie (Japanese family system) - revision as of 26 July 2006. Neither of the two have changed much in the content, which I'm questioning as in Talk:Ie (Japanese family system)#Tag "Original Research". --Dumpty-Humpty (talk) 04:06, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Tag "Delete Section"
Talk:Delinquent

message: This article is goddamned stupid.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.31.6.101 (talk) 02:22, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: And yet on the Russian wiki, this is a featured article.  It's strange that so much more attention has been paid to the concept there... Esn (talk) 20:51, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The Russian article's title literally translates to "personality of a criminal". I'm not necessarily sure this is the right link. Daniel Case (talk) 03:22, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: despair-its noun-a giving up or loss of hope  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.199.3.53 (talk) 01:00, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Despair 

message: Project 41.114.35.117 (talk) 11:54, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Life Orientation
Talk:Salah Abdul Rasool Al Blooshi

message: I reverted a recent edit  as per this discussion.  Geo Swan (talk) 06:13, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  revert  -- see talk 
Talk:Salah Al Bandar

message: There are too many references for such a short article. I suggest we expand the article and lose many of the references. --Buster7 (talk) 03:19, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: Can anyone confirm that this is the same person as the Cambridge City Councillor?  The link confims that the name is the same but no more Septimus ii (talk) 00:17, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: UK Politics

message: It would be interesting to include some of the controversy around salah Al Bandar's comments on Nahla Mahmoud   I will have a go when I've the time PhilMacD (talk) 14:40, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to Nahla Mahmoud 

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement.  Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. 💵Money💵emoji💵Talk💸Help out at CCI!  00:24, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:Salah Muhammad Salih Al Dhabi

message: We are running two articles of ISN 572.
*Salah Muhammad Salih Al Dhabi and 
*Slah Muhamed Salih Al Zabe
Salah Muhammad Salih Al Dhabi is the alternate name of Slah Muhamed Salih Al Zabe so i will merge this article here into Slah Muhamed Salih Al Zabe in a few days.  
Anybody who thinks it is not a good idea? IQinn (talk) 06:46, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge?
Talk:Salary Grab Act

message: .  Your effort was appreciated, but when I went to make edits I was visually overwhelmed by the dozens of templates and hidden text mixed in with the narrative text, making it very tedious to navigate.  I make it a general practice to put templates in the Sources section, and link to them with a simple citation/link in the narrative, using e.g. |ref=jenkins and Jenkins, p.123. Most if not all the material in the narrative can be and was covered with the existing sources. The previous existing sources are actually more reliable than newspaper clippings, which often don't have any name attributed to them, as compared to the original sources. i.e.History texts and journals written by established historians. Don't mean to sound prudish or anything, but Calhoun, Jenkins, Nonnenmacher, etc, are probably the best and most recognizable sources available on this topic. In the event that they can't support a given item I'd welcome a newspaper source, esp if can offer something the other sources can't.  Hope this is acceptable for you. Again, many thanks for your interest and efforts. -- Gwillhickers (talk) 01:16, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Too many templates

message: The article now makes good use of all the news sources you've provided -- listed in a footnote, with a reference to them after the statement about, "... the general public and the press." In several instances they are used as citations. ' Best, Gwillhickers (talk) 00:40, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Newpaper sources
Talk:Demise of the Crown

message: .. appears nowhere in the Jargon article the phrase is linked to. Is this supposed to be a sign of how specialist a bit of jargon it is? 12:33, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: just a very bad bit of editing on my part.  Thanks for noticing it. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 00:52, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Lerm term"
Talk:Bank Charter Act 1844

message: This Act applies, and continues to apply, in Scotland and Northern Ireland Mauls 21:32, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I had thought it was under English law - private note-issue in Scotland and NI hasn't been stopped, so how does it continue if this act applies UK-wide? Did the Bank Notes (Scotland) Act 1845 and Bankers (Ireland) Act 1845 have anything to do with this? Would be interested to know.
--Cnbrb 12:07, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Section 11, Restriction against issue of bank notes, specifies only England and Wales, which explains everything.Cnbrb (talk) 14:13, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Scotland and Northern Ireland
Talk:Astounding Award for Best New Writer

message: I corrected a few things in the article - the award is for writers of both SF and fantasy, not just SF, for instance. I also tried to make the text more Encyclopedic and moved the links to the bottom. VJDocherty 16:46, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarifications 

message: Is it correct to refer to the award as the Astounding Award when specifically referring to winners before it was renamed?  I'd think it would be more accurate and clear to talk about the Campbell award in those cases. Putting "the [year] Astounding Award (then called the John W. Campbell Award)" each time seems clumsy. Very happy to refer to it as the Astounding Award in generic cases, but it seems to me that in, say, 2017, the winner specifically received the Campbell Award. TSP (talk) 11:03, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming 

message: If this name change stays, then the pages with this category should presumably also be updated? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:John_W._Campbell_Award_for_Best_New_Writer_winners
I dunno if there's functionality/tooling to make this easier than manually updating 40-odd pages individually? ErsatzCulture (talk) 23:46, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Author category 

message: The Eligibility and voting section reports that the given criteria for an author to be eligible are specifically defined ... but says nothing about when a writer is or is not "New".
Given that more than one writer has been nominated in more than one year, it would be interesting to know.
AndrewA (talk) 12:34, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.  (Writers are eligible for two years, beginning with their first professional sf/f sale.) Dan Bloch (talk) 22:07, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eligibility - When is a writer not New ?
Talk:Salem Abdul Salem Ghereby

message: I removed the "Identity" section with the "Captive  189...", there i no good reason or need for such a section in this article and it was dehumanizing and based on WP:OR by WP:SYN. IQinn (talk) 13:08, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Identity 
Talk:Bank holding company

message: It would be great if someone with advanced knowledge of the role of bank holding companies could explain the significance of financial companies converting into bank holding companies as a strategy to get through the crisis.  This marks a major progression in the role of bank holding companies and should be addressed in the article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ranever (talk • contribs) 01:12, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Credit Crunch 2008 

message: According to the definitions on this article, the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 created and defines what is a Bank Holding Company.  The article needs to be reworked to take an overall perspective on what is a BHC, I think the BHC Act of 1956 would make a good subsection to this article.  Also, the description of a BHC has been misinterpreted from the legalese on the FDIC act, let's work the articles together and then find a broad definition that actually makes sense. Ranever (talk) 00:34, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose. Please keep Bank Holding Company Act, which is about an importance piece of U.S. federal banking legislation. Bank holding company is a worldwide article, which can summarize this one. Bank regulation in the United States can also summarize this one. -Pnm (talk) 04:35, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Convention Relating to the Status of Stateless Persons

message: On 3 October, I saw that only 63 parties were named as parties to the Convention.  I therefore replaced that list with the list on the Treaty Collection page, which claims that there are 83 parties, but lists 88 (including the Holy See).  I have NOT: (1) examined the Treaty Collection list to distinguish between types of parties; (2) updated the 'categories' at the bottom of the page; or (3) updated the map of parties at the top of the page.  I welcome correction if I have made any errors: I do not know about the treaty, and have just performed a technical edit. Colin Rowat (talk) 20:48, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct listing of parties to the Convention 

message: Sorry, goofed in the reason: I meant MOS:TITLECAPS not WP:TITLECAPS. Knr5 (talk) 20:04, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move
Talk:Demurrage

message: The topic of this article is demurrage. The topic of this article is not the term 'demurrage.' --95.34.3.209 (talk) 00:44, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use/mention error
Talk:Bankruptcy discharge

message: I added to the opening section a while back the following: "The debtor's credit report will retain evidence of the bankruptcy discharge for seven to ten years." The citation link was removed as "not meeting WP:RS as a source". 
So here's the question: if the citation was untrusted, then why was the fact retained? Alternately, if the fact was good, why was the citation of that fact removed? Just trying to understand how things work around here, thanks.
Yankeerudy (talk) 20:06, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I did remove the statement as I could not easily verify the statement. Flowanda | Talk 02:30, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation question 

message: — Assignment last updated by EF1007 (talk) 00:21, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Advanced Legal Research
Talk:Salinas Sports Complex

message: Since the use of the rodeo grounds as a Japanese American internment camp is currently the only piece of miscellaneous information on this page, I am changing the title of this section to focus on the assembly center. If anyone has other items to add, feel free to change it back; it just seems odd to have a list with only one bullet point.MartinaDee (talk) 00:03, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Miscellaneous information --> Salinas Assembly Center