lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Chuang Chou

message: just wanted to double check this: isn't Chuang Chou the same person as Zhuang Zi? they both were taoist philosophers who lived 4th century bc, and although the wikipedia article on zhuang zi does not list chuang chou as an alternative, the wikiquote article does. in the event that they are the same person i would suggest that this page be removed.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Xooz98 (talk • contribs) 10:35, 18 October 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Whatever was inaccurate about it, was inaccurate from out of a compendium of philosophers and nothing to do with my eclectic selection of quotes there of. Nagelfar 09:17, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
Talk:West Coast Region

message: "To New Zealanders the term "The Coast" invariably refers to the West Coast of the South Island, and "Coasters" to those that live there"
~ really? i lived in Christchurch for 22 years & never heard anyone refer to it as "The Coast" or "Coasters". Maybe West Coasters refer to themselves like that, but not other New Zealanders.
--- Yeah I agree, I have lived in new zealand for 19 years and I have never once heard anyone from the west coast being referred to as a "coaster".
Kotare 22:15, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Links are okay, but as 1 and 2 were basically identical, I removed one. But the reference is certainly given now.MadMaxDog 08:16, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "The Coast"

message: I reverted the inclusion of this external link because the site appears to be commercial - the photos are for sale. Kahuroa (talk) 05:15, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Commercial photos
Talk:Baldwin I, Margrave of Flanders

message: There is something wrong or unclear:
# Baldwin is created first count of Flanders in 862
# he eloped with Judith in 863
# he is made count of Ghent after the recognition of the marriage by king Charles
I assume that count of Ghent and count of Flanders could be the same. But I don't understand when he is made count - before or after the marriage. --Nk 11:14, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC
Also, Raoul is listed as being born about 10 years after Baldwin's death - Not sure how that can be accurate??  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.251.250.210 (talk) 19:03, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Except from "Gestis Comitum Barcinonensium" therare not any more evidence that Guinidilda d¨Ampuries was daughther of Baldwin
There are more evidences, that Guinidilda was a local woman (Septimania) probably daughther of  one Borrell  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.36.137.5 (talk) 09:03, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guinidilda is not a  daughther of Baldwin 

message: Baldwin I "was the son of Odoacer. Odoacer was the son of Enguerrand delle Fiandre. Enguerrand delle Fiandre was the daughter of Liederik."
Enguerrand is a male French name, so could impossibly have been someone's daughter.
And why mention Enguerrand's name in Italian?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.118.147.64 (talk) 12:31, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Enguerrand
Talk:Europa (wargame)

message: I created this article with content taken from Drang nach Osten, because I think the explanation of the political/historical concept and the description of this game should be kept separate. Whether or not this game is significant enough to have its own article is another question that I do not want to decide. I have never heard of this game nor of its authors, but others may have a different opinion, of course. --Thorsten1 11:52, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article had its origins when material about DNO was removed from the article about the historical Drang nach Osten, so the article contained some very specific material about DNO that IMO is not appropriate to the article that now covers the whole Europa series (e.g., number of counters). Also, I don't think all the facts are correct; someone seems to be confusing the "16 km" with the 16 miles actually used by the system. However, I'm preserving it here in case someone doesn't want to discard it and doesn't want to have to dig through the article history to find it. Some of this is still covered by the article; I just didn't want to cite incomplete sentences here. — B.Bryant 20:41, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  DNO-specific stuff deleted from the article 

message: Onership of the trademark, if any, is disputed.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:52, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: One of the (multiple) problems is that trademarks can only be maintained through use of the trademark. If you cease to produce products (games, magazines), the trademark ceases to be valid. Updating a website every few years is not the same as being in business. The comment in 2009 may also have been a reference to the Cory Manka lawsuit against HMS which was since settled. Its unfortunate that the article doesn't mention any of the non-HMS-associated "after Europa" projects and efforts. 198.45.174.250 (talk) 17:07, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trademark 

message: Anyone care to explain what in the article is original research. I didn't see any. 12.12.144.130 (talk) 22:18, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  original research? 
Talk:Golden goal

message: Is it right, that football matches used to be ended with a golden goal without a time limit?
Does anyone know any more about that?
:Certainly never in soccer. In American football they used to have sudden death without a time limit Dankru 22:26, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other methods 

message: * 2002 World Cup (with golden goal).  3 matches decided in extra time.  2 matches decided by a penalty shootout.
* 2006 World Cup (with no golden goal).  2 matches decided in extra time.  4 matches (including the final) decided by a penalty shootout.
The same pattern holds if you look at a wider range of tournaments, including the UEFA cup.  Golden goal is significantly more successful in getting a result in extra time and avoiding penalties.
Surely it's better to decide a match by a golden goal than a penalty shootout?  Idiots.  Grover cleveland (talk) 05:43, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Why the heck did they abolish Golden Goal in football (soccer)??

message: : Disagree Having the Silver goal article separate is the most appropriate, as it is not the same as the Golden goal concept. 24.63.105.208 (talk) 15:27, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree Golden goals and silver goals are similar concepts and were introduced around the same time in association football (soccer). Silver goals can just be a separate section within the article. Both articles need some work anyway, especially the silver goal article. 11:47, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

text: Agree this should be merged --Pretty Green (talk) 09:18, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge article [[Silver goal]] into [[Golden goal]]

message: There is an instance of a golden goal being scored in a Youdan Cup tie of 1867 that predates the one scored by The Wednesday in the Cromwell Cup final by nearly a year. It was reported in the Sheffield Independent of 26/03/1867 that the Youdan Cup second round tie between Norfolk Park and Broomhall on 23/02/1867 went to extra-time. The tie was won by Norfolk who managed to 'kick a goal' within two minutes of the restart. see here Youdan Cup - The World's First Football Trophy
Tuskom (talk) 16:51, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical Context 

message: There’s some duplicate material; golden goal is essentially synonymous with sudden death. —Wiki Wikardo 14:58, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge? 

message: The inclusion of baseball in this article seems tenuous at best.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bcostley (talk • contribs) 01:33, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Baseball
Talk:Giuliano de' Medici, Duke of Nemours

message: When you say "is the genealogy correct?", what specifically are you referring to? There have been a number of errors in the Medici pages caused by the repetitive names - e.g. I just fixed the death date of Giovanni di Bicci, whom someone had confused with Giovanni di Cosimo. I could easily believe there is another one somewhere! However, AFAIK everything on this page is correct at the moment. I do know there is some historical controversy as to whether Alessandro is the son of Lorenzo II or Cardinal Giulio; Wikipedia is currently going with the theory that he's of Giulio, but I personally have no strong views either way. Noel 14:30, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: As for me, I was just struggling to disentangle second-hand sources. "Correct at the moment" is good to hear! Wetman 22:10, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)

text: I'll make it 1478/1479 til we can establish whether this is simply the familiar Old Style/New Style contradiction about the start date of the year. Wetman 22:10, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)

text: Oops. The version that's so familiar-- simply because I'm a New Yorker-- is the 16th-century studio copy at the Met. I thought the original was famous, though I've only known the copy all this time. The triple portrait is indeed a better-known painting, I agree. Wetman 22:06, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text:  Hmm, I wonder where the original is? I don't recognize it (but then again Renaissance art is not my strong suit). I tried doing a web search for it, but there was too much other stuff in the results. This page shows a better image, if you want to link to it. Noel 22:50, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)

text: Sometimes "famous" originals get lost, like Michelangelo's Leda but stay famous through copies and prints and interpretations. (That link doesn't look good on my browser: tobacco-red). But this "famous" needs to drop out of the entry. Wetman 00:33, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Lorenzo de' Medici (1463–1503) - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 11:01, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Pocket Full of Kryptonite

message: All tracks written by Spin Doctors except for track 6 by Eric Schenkman/Graham Clark/John Fitting/Simon Lambert; track 8 by Spin Doctors/John Bell; track 10 (Hard to Exist) by Spin Doctors/John Popper/Aaron Comess. This information is from the liner notes, but the individual names are from lyric sites since the notes list the writers as A. Comess (e.g.). I am unfamiliar with how to create a citation link, so instead I will ask someone who DOES know to a) determine the usability of this information and b) add it.
http://www.metrolyrics.com/more-than-she-knows-lyrics-spin-doctors.html
http://www.metrolyrics.com/off-my-line-lyrics-spin-doctors.html
http://www.lyricsbay.com/doctors_spin_hard_to_exist_lyrics-spin_doctors.html
Please be aware that these are lyric sites and there may be pop-ups/unders. I am not associated with these sites and have found them via Google searches.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bwanderson (talk • contribs) 23:31, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Songwriting credit corrections
Talk:Mescalero

message: Shouldn't the language information be moved to a new page, Mescalero language? That would make sense to me.
: – Benjamin 18:09, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  ok: Mescalero language. peace – ishwar  (speak) 19:20, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Isn't there a more neutral word than "hostile" to describe native Americans actively resisting the violent infringement of their tribal territory or the coerced taking of their land?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ocdcntx (talk • contribs) 23:45, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Isn't there a more neutral word than "hostile" to describe native Americans resisting the taking of their land?  

message: I am working on updating the culture section of this page to add more information on men's and women's roles in hunting and gathering. -Dan4735 (talk) 22:12, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I have updated the page with information about men's and women's division of labor, as well as kinship patterns. Dan4735 (talk) 00:16, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes to culture section 

message: If someone has a wealth of time and energy, this article should probably be split into articles about the historic Mescalero Apache band and the Mescalero Apache Tribe of the Mescalero Reservation. Yuchitown (talk) 03:58, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ethnic group / Tribe today
Talk:Infantry (video game)/Archive 1

message: Stop deleting this article to suit your own needs.  This is getting ridiculous having to put information back in there.
: Tag your comments.  Assuming this is regarding FreeInfantry: The legality of that link hasn't been disussed yet. // 3R1C 22:16, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sony Modifications

message: The "Funny Stuff" article his horribly POV.  I'm removing it.  Someone can feel free to edit it and make it less bias.  I'd take care of it, but I'm dealing with a different article 3R1C 00:35, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: POV Section

message: Criticism section is rather POV
:agreed.  removed because there isn't a legit piece of info in it 3R1C 02:21, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Critcism NPOV status

message: Stop blanking out the free server links. 3R1C 13:24, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism

message: In October 2005, Weeks was laid off again, and it is largely speculated that the aforementioned decrease in user subscription is the reason for Weeks' removal.
According to who? Are there any sources to back that claim up? Statement was completely unencyclopedic and was removed.  11:27, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: That's hardly true at all // 3R1C 14:08, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  speculation
Talk:Daphne Moon

message: I moved the spoiler notice because the biography section refers to Niles and Daphne's marriage etc. 
82.40.75.55 21:42, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Spoiler Move

message: There were only 10 seasons of Frasier, yet the article counts 11. It also claims that, in the first episode of the 10th season, Daphne and Niles get married, which is untrue. I don't know what episode it is, but it must be in the 9th season (not yet released in the US). If someone is in the know, please correct this.
:Check your facts.  There are indeed 11 seasons of Frasier.  The 11th season had a full 24 episodes.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by RainnIceberg (talk • contribs) 07:05, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Season Discrepency 

message: There's a reference to that date that needs a bit of elaboration: "In the first episode of Season 10, Daphne and Niles marry in a small, private ceremony in Reno, Nevada. In Season 11, they have their first child, David, in the final episode of the series, "Goodnight, Seattle". He is named after one of the show's producers who died on September 11, 2001."
I think it should say "died in the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001" if that's the case. Or it should specify how he died if there was some other cause. Also, including his surname would be helpful. Pha telegrapher (talk) 17:00, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sept. 11, 2001 

message: There's a passing (picture) reference to Prince Charles(?) in season 2 episode 17.  Anybody think this is worthy of a mention? - Acq3 (talk) 22:17, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prince Charles 

message: I'm pretty dubious that Lisa Maxwell did anything more than a reading for the Daphne Moon part.  In Ken Levine's blog, show creatior Peter Casey notes Jane Leeves was preapproved by NBC, and Kelsey Grammer (who was originally hesitant to have an English actor in the role), approved her after doing a reading alone with Leeves.  Maxwell isn't mentioned at all.
http://kenlevine.blogspot.com/2010/12/how-frasier-came-to-be.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Calliaume (talk • contribs) 14:44, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lisa Maxwell 

message: This article was tagged with a  tag in 2015, which I have removed. In §Biography, the point of reference for historical present seems to be when the character is introduced in the show. The first few paragraphs leading up to it seem to be backstory, which seems appropriate to be left in past tense. —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 18:25, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyeditor passing by 

message: The Show Must Go Off
Hooping Cranes
Docu.Drama
It Takes Two to Tangle
Forgotten But Not Gone Goojrr (talk) 11:38, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Absences
Talk:Anne Stuart (daughter of Charles I)

message: Princess Anne of England was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was KEEP.  9 votes to keep, 1 to merge and redirect, and 7 to delete, some of which endorsed merging content but weren't clear whether the redirect should be kept.  Postdlf 01:08, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Orphaned, three-sentenced article for someone who died at the age of four over 350 years ago.  Given that children of famous people today often don't deserve articles based on who their parents were, I don't see how this is any different. -- Graham  ☺ | Talk 17:07, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Princess Anne of England]]

message: When I moved the article, one of the reasons I cited was there being a lot of English princesses named Elizabeth. Of course, I meant princesses named Anne. Surtsicna (talk) 23:32, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correction 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. Unopposed. (closed by non-admin page mover) – MaterialWorks 13:46, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Anne Stuart (1637–1640) →  – Per WP:CONSISTENT with Elizabeth Stuart (daughter of Charles I). Or, the other page should be moved to Elizabeth Stuart (1635–1650). estar8806 (talk) ★ 14:56, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

text: Support per nom. 2601:249:9301:D570:1877:1728:C421:31DB (talk) 18:44, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 7 August 2023
Talk:Solomon ibn Gabirol

message: Hi. I saw that you recently tagged this article for possible "original research". Could you be more specific? I'm currently doing major edits / additions to the page, and so far, all my edits have been directly and explicitly citing the "Davidson" source, down to the specific page number. So, if you were referring to my additions as possible OR, that's not the case. 
—Boruch Baum (talk) 17:31, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Boruch Baum. There are several paragraphs and even entire section without inline citations/unreferenced and as such seemed to me like possible original research. I'll assume good faith and remove it, but adding these would be a good idea. Otherwise great job on the article. Robvanvee 19:53, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  no original research 
Talk:Organizational theory

message: I am putting in a redirect to organizational studies, since none of this stuff is really organizational theory as it is currently studied. Instead, most of these links are to ways of organizing things. I am open to suggestions, however. --Goodoldpolonius 03:37, 21 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: * A postmodern study is definitely necessary here. Additionally, the section criticizing Weber's theory seems to be focused on refuting criticism rather than fairly stating arguments against his system. We have two ears and one mouth, so we should listen more than we say... By silence, I hear other men's imperfections and conceal my own... Better to trip with the feet than with the tongue. (talk) 21:35, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect

message: This article is full of useless verbiage - needlessly long-winded and repetitive. Additionally, it is riddled with grammatical disagreements in number. It reads as if it was written by a single writer who liked using many words when few will do, and who had trouble distinguishing singular and plural. I suspect that the writer was not a native speaker of English.
I'm about to make many scattered changes to fix this; I hope I don't accidentally change its meaning while doing so, or cause other damage. 
Ooh, this is a good one: "the [...] context in which organizations arose [...] allowed [...] for the development of organizations".
Well, I guess so... chuckle
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.202.224.109 (talk) 10:05, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs rewriting 

message: The article is in need of some work, that is for sure. The opening paragraph contains redundancies, incorrect grammar, almost no citations, and no links to external pages. The rest of the article follows this pattern.
The subcategories cover a variety of topics, however as others have pointed out, there is information missing (Postmodern Organizational Theory). Some of the subheadings also need to be corrected for grammar. 
The paragraph about the criticisms of Weber's theory contain almost no citations in the text, there are three cited sources for that sub heading, but there's no indicator as to where one piece of information came from where.
Overall, a rewrite of a lot of the information could be used, references are needed, citations are needed, grammar needs to be corrected, information needs to be added, and links to other relevant pages would be nice as well.
Randzeo (talk) 20:09, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Evaluation 

message: Modernization theorist Frank Dobbin states "modern institutions are transparently purposive and that we are in the midst an evolutionary progression towards more efficient forms".
Tragic for Dobbin if this shouldn't actually be rendered: 
Modernization theorist Frank Dobbin states "modern institutions are transparently purposive" and that "we are in the midst an evolutionary progression towards more efficient forms".
— MaxEnt 17:13, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Frank Dobbin's spurious "that"