lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Point system (driving)

message: Also, when did it go from 3 years to 4 for speeding points? Law on the Web gives more details on when the 4/11 year rules apply. Dalavich 15:51, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 3 to 4 years

message: This article does not mention the system used in France. 82.46.50.115 (talk) 11:30, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: France

message: I thought law breakers in NSW lost points rather then accumulated them? Ryanwiki (talk) 07:31, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: New South Wales

message: According to ARD Tagesschau on 1 May 2014, the German points system has been rescaled (see table):
Old penalty points	New penalty points
1–3               	1
4–5               	2
6–7               	3
8–10              	4
11–13             	5
14–15             	6
16–17             	7
≥ 18              	8
Sources needed. Thanks. --Marianian(talk) 14:22, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  New points system in Germany 

message: link invalid  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.8.206.133 (talk) 22:22, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  footnote 24  

message: I came here looking to see the origins of this system and which countries were first, second, etc. The article says at the start that Germany introduced their system in 1974 and New York introduced one around the same time, implying they were first. However, further down it seems Victoria had a system in 1969. When did the UK system start? I think the article would be improved hugely by a section on the history of the system across the world. 188.141.10.11 (talk) 17:01, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Article improvement: history of point system

message: i dont have time for this now... but in case anyone is interested.
http://www.in.gov/bmv/2374.htm 
Rue-chan (talk) 00:21, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  indiana is missing 

message: The wording of the lead should be changed to avoid talking about "accumulation" of points as the sole method of losing a license. In some countries, such as France, you are assigned a certain number of points when you receive your driving license, and with each penalty for breaking a traffic law, one or more points is removed from your license, and when you have no points left, you have no license. Mathglot (talk) 18:36, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subtractive point system
Talk:Kurkure

message: I am suggesting a move to Kurkure. If any one has any objections, post them here or on my talk page. If there are no objections, I shall carry out the move on October 9. The Silent Contributor 10:51, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Page move

message: How Kurkure made. I need to know.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Girishduppalli (talk • contribs) 11:37, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: @User:Girishduppalli I have added the details. Komchi (talk) 16:26, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kurkure ingredients 

message: I oppose inclusion of this "Controversy" section, as the reference consists of a corporate FAQ page unequivocally denying malicious unsubstantiated rumors. Random rumors and a company's denial of the rumors is not a "controversy" and is unworthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia, in the absence of coverage in reliable, independent sources. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 21:33, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: , if I reliable source of the controversy then will it be worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia? Komchi✉☆ 15:58, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy section 

message: @Adamgerber, the Pakistani version of this product is actually copied from your country India's, believe me. And also the Pakistani Kurkure is fake, as for example the flavor 'red chili jhatka' is actually copied from India's 'Masala Munch' and 'Hyderabadi Hungama', I can't address the other Pakistani Kurkure flavors as 'namkeen', they are not worthy of it. Fayaz Rahman (talk) 07:13, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Pakistani version
Talk:Agranulocyte

message: Are agranulocytes the same as PBMC? Should these articles be merged? --LasseFolkersen 10:59, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I also believe the term is archaic. It is still used in Spanish, albeit it will surely be overshadowed by the more recent and perhaps accurate terms. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 20:40, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

text: "PBMC" is still commonly used in the lab. My wife works on infiltrating PBMCs in HIV peripheral nerve, and that's the terminology that most everyone uses. NeuroJoe (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 14:06, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[PBMC]] and [[Mononuclear leukocytes]] 

message: I'm not sure where the idea that monocytes are agranulocytes came from. There's a source here that clearly states they're granular, and the wiki page on monocytes says they have granules as well. Granulated monocytes also agrees with the hematopoietic lineages, and there's no reason for them not to have granules, since everything in the lineage has them as well. Perhaps this misconception derives from the above commentary that "agranulocyte" is an uncommon and poorly defined term. Daemyth (talk) 01:23, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Monocytes are granulocytes 

message: This article is misleading.  While the statement that T cells cells are crucial to the immune system due to its immune memory is not false, the exclusion of B cells and even natural killer cells from the concept of immune memory creates the impression that T cells alone are responsible for immune memory.  Any reader that reads this page will come away from it, thinking that T cells are the only part of the immune system that has facilitates immune memory. 197.229.2.247 (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  T cells are not the only cells with immune memory
Talk:Carlton Draught

message: Does this really need such extensive links to advertising? --Pleasantville 11:36, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertising links 

message: Asahi of Japan is the parent company. Any reference to Carlton as the owner organization is misleading. 58.171.19.69 (talk) 09:21, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ownership
Talk:Diana (Spooks)

message: Why does this page exist? There is no information on ... anything ... 83.151.197.97 11:25, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: expanded - work in progress. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 11:57, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is also as an example for providing an episode page for each episode of Spooks. User|Neddyseagoon 21:29, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why?
Talk:Peripheral blood mononuclear cell

message: Isn't this the same as a agranulocyte? Shouldn't it be mentioned that there is a whole article about them? --LasseFolkersen 11:30, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: so? what do do with it.
Obviously, with a space elevator you can achieve artificial gravity: the question is, who or why et al would try to explain how to  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:4DD7:A13:0:843D:27B6:EE6C:C385 (talk) 08:23, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  yes i got from somewhere blood type zero negative
Talk:Cronton

message: No offence meant, but who is "famous person" Dylan Thompson?
Exile 11:33, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Famous Person Dylan Thompson' 

message: I live in Widnes, and it's well known that footballer, Joey Barton, lives in Cronton. Maybe we should mention this?
Jake.rhcp.utd 20:01, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Joey Barton 

message: the article says that it is in Merseyside yet the infobox says Cheshire. Which is it?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.234.184.77 (talk) 20:38, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merseyside or Cheshire?
Talk:Lev Kulchitsky

message: from the tableau you can sea the Order 1 dg. of St Stanislaus end 3nd dg. Ste. Anne.88.139.183.187 11:38, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orders 

message: Is there any good reason why this shouldn't be moved to Lev Kulchitsky, a more appropriate romanisation?  --  Jack of Oz  ... speak! ...  19:05, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, there is no problem with that.ISasha (talk) 19:17, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks.  Moved now.  --  Jack of Oz  ... speak! ...  19:32, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kulchitsky?
Talk:Stephen Friedman (economist)

message: Other article indicates information which should go here. Also, this (primary) article should be renamed "Stephen Freidman (banker)" or something otherwise suitable, as his PFIAB appointment was a short part of his career. Facts707 (talk) 04:38, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree with Merge proposal, as it more relevant for the person than the bank. Klbrain (talk) 15:42, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: The "Richard Friedman"-link does not lead to the right Richard Firedman. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.109.248.245 (talk) 17:50, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Richard Friedman 

message: I am so sorry that I forgot to explain my edits before I saved all my changes. I will explain here what I did: Stephen Friedman is quite an important person- there is tons of info on him. When I first saw his Wiki article there were almost no citations, at all. So I decided to look up everything, re-write for clarity and interest, and cite all the sources. I added almost no new information, so I invite editors to look this man up and add to his page. He is really an important man in the world of government and finance.Jiminycricket55 (talk) 10:02, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revision of article
Talk:Christian Friedrich Ludwig Buschmann

message: please, needs correction to put it to readabe English--Jpascher 11:44, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I regret to say that you are mistaken, but before I put the Cleanup tag back I will look at the article myself to see if I can help it along. HeartofaDog 15:22, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

text: I have done as much immediate clean-up as seems necessary, so won't re-tag it, and I have enough German to compare the corresponding article at de-Wiki, which I have also done, but if you are able to fill in some of the gaps and redlinks, of course that would be very good. In particular can you check the details of Prof Buschmann's "family history" that you mention: I have added details of his book(let) on Friedrich, but the family history seems to be a different work, which I wasn't able to track down in the time available.HeartofaDog 16:07, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

text: I'm glad it's OK. I've changed the para on JC Schlimbach as per your additional inf. HeartofaDog 11:13, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Please do some corrections on typing and style, because i had to change some of the information based on new enlighten, after spending a lot of time with the original handwriting.--Jpascher (talk) 16:46, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Update
Talk:North Vista Secondary School

message: Hello there! This article appears to be written like an autobiography, at least to the school in question. There is lots of first person talking and bold text highlighting 'Missions' and 'Visions'. Please write it to read more like a proper encyclopedic page :)
--RabidJackal 11:45, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think it's much of a problem as it's mainly confined to the mission and vision portions which could be in the first person. —Sengkang 16:48, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Autobiograpy 

message: This page has been under constant valdalism since the end of March. Is there a way to restrict editing of this page to accounts that are older to curb this vandalism?
Graphpaper 13:24, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Continual Vandalism 

message: A good start article. You now need to focus on the referencing and use the recommended referencing style so that the references are incorporated within the text. Ask at WPSchools if you need any help. The article must be written in your own words and you must acknowledge your sources. I note for instance that most of the history section has been copied and pasted from the school's own website which is in breach of copyright. You must also adopt a neutral point of view and make sure that any contentious claims (eg, the illustrious alumni) are backed up with references. I would expect a much longer list of alumni from such a prestigious school. The pictures would be much better incorporated into the text rather. You need to explain some of the initials in the achievements section (SYF etc) as these are meaningless to anyone outside Singapore. Have a look at some of the existing school B class and featured articles for some ideas on layout. Ask if you need help. Dahliarose 17:43, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assess
Talk:Rondò Veneziano

message: It's been 23 years, admittedly, but...wasn't La Serenissima used for ITV programme trailers, rather than BBC?  I'm loathe to edit the main article unless anyone else can corroborate this one, but that's certainly my memory...David Brider 16:08, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: ITV

message: I am quite sure they had their first appearance in an evening show live on German TV in Summer 1979, performing "San Marco". 2003:C8:9737:B400:69A6:ED36:30FD:1A0F (talk) 19:06, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  First appearance in Germany
Talk:Big Bend (Florida)

message: we may see a jump here for a little while. --Sm8900 (talk) 19:14, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  note 

message: When did the term/phrase "big bend of Florida" come into existence?
I lived in Gainesville for a few years and never heard "big bend" in reference to Florida, only Texas. 2600:8800:395:B000:6912:65CF:576B:F1F9 (talk) 18:03, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't say when I first became aware of the term, but it has been decades. I see several mentions of "Big Bend area" and "Big Bend Coast" in The Geology of Florida, published in 1997 by the University Press of Florida. I have also found that the Big Bend Seagrasses Aquatic Preserve was established in 1985. I am sure the term was in common use well before then. Donald Albury 19:10, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

text: Come to think of it, I probably first became aware of the term when I lived in Tallahassee in the mid-1970s. - Donald Albury 19:15, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The term
Talk:List of major springs in Florida

message: I am presently rewriting the article and have increased the spring count from 37 to 109, plus adding basic data and photographs. Expect to put in production on February 1st, 2013. 
Mgrē@sŏn 20:04, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: * With that more precise and limited scope, I'd be able to give it a second check for FLC and likely my support.--ColonelHenry (talk) 16:11, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite 
Talk:Bunnahabhain

message: The mention of Black Bottle seems to be pure advertising blurb as opposed to fact. Certainly when I lived in Bunnahabhain I'd never heard of Black Bottle so to call it the spiritual home seems like a recently invented marketing ploy more than anything else.
This is a terrible article re: npov. I don't have time right now to work on it, but I'm at least removing the phrase "offering stunning views of the neighbouring islands of Jura and Mull, Bunnahabhain is a secluded paradise surrounded by natural beauty" from the first paragraph.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.236.75.82 (talk) 05:03, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Simon Clark (novelist)

message: This page has been looked at by 2 editors - one of whom assessed it with the reviews included. Another editor adjusted the reviews to make them more balanced. But now a third editor has come along and deleted them altogether!! I've put them back - I don't see why they should go until all 3 agree.S.tollyfield (talk) 18:02, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: S.tollyfield, your nomination of the article at DYK will not be approved with the Critical reactions section as it is now. Since you've restored it by reverting my edit (and in doing so removed a number of other edits that were fixing a severe overlinking problem as well as properly italicizing book titles), I have tagged it with the appropriate template. Sections on critical reception/reaction are not supposed to be a series of quotes; the text is supposed to summarize the general reaction in your own words, with perhaps a short phrase quoted from the various reviews in question. Printing chunks of reviews is not only unencyclopedic, it can violate fair use rules if too much of the original is used. In this case, WP:Blockquote would also come into play. BlueMoonset (talk) 18:34, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

text: It is better, yes, without the large quotes. However, only the first of them, on Darker, does the job properly, where your words describe what the reviewer said with only a bit from the actual reviewer. The rest just give very short quotes from the reviews of each book without any summarizing of review content by you. It's probably fine for DYK now in its current form, but if you want to take the article further, you'll need to do more work. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:15, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Critical reactions section
Talk:Gerry Lenfest

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Heidijane 12:35, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: I'm not sure why "The deal was completed with the help of Dilworth Paxson lawyer Richard L. Fox" is significant to understanding Lenfest's donation of the Philadelphia Inquirer. That a lawyer would negotiate this deal is routine and obvious, and neither Dilworth Paxson nor Richard L. Fox are especially noteworthy. The source only briefly mentions Fox, and gives very little detail about his role in this. If additional sources provide any context, they could be included, but right now this appears to be an attempt to promote Fox or his firm at the expense of WP:NPOV. Grayfell (talk) 02:00, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Richard L. Fox.
Talk:Free City of Lübeck

message: I created this entry to reduce confusion between Lübeck the city and Lübeck the former independent city-state. Any historical links to the Lübeck (city) entry, when they really refer to the state, can now link to here instead. At the moment, a lot of the text here has been taken from the city entry, but it's a start. — 52 Pickup 12:36, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

message: Large blocks of text were copied and pasted from Worldlingo.com website entry.  Needs to be rewritten. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.41164.58 (talk) 05:39 19 May 2010 (UTC)
:No. Not a copyvio. The alleged source is a Wikipedia mirror. Vyvyan Basterd (talk) 19:44, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Plagiarism
Talk:Canons of Renaissance poetry

message: This article is mis-named as it is just on English poetry. Furthermore, there is, oddly, no article on English renaissance poetry, or Elizabethan poetry, though there is one on the Metaphysical poets. This is reads more like a scholarly paper (or student essay) than an encyclopaedia article. I suggest that it be re-written to focus more on the poetry, and with just one section discussing the canon. Otherwise it should be part of a much wider discussion of the topic, The Canon in literature. Rwood128 (talk) 18:02, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: On further thought it would probably be best to merge this article with Western canon. Comments? Rwood128 (talk) 19:09, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: As there has been no objections I will complete the merge shortly. Rwood128 (talk) 13:04, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page title
Talk:Athens, Vermont

message: Hey guys, I'm the WikiProject Cities assessor of this article; if you need advice on how to improve it, just come and give me a holler! --Starstriker7(Say hior see my works) 05:54, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Volume-weighted average price

message: technically - VWAP is similar to a moving average, but...
It DOESN'T MOVE like the ordinary MA, the periods are usually set at 1 day
and don't consider the previous day, the open counts the same as the close, etc.
The use of VWAP is very different than the use in finance of MA (comparing execution cost vs. "predicting" future prices).  In short they are different enough to have seperate articles. 
NO to merger.  Smallbones 12:51, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

message: Sigma is not defined in formula. Its not apparent if you're intended to create a summation of price or volume
for sigma.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:A601:A0C6:1200:5D59:AE71:31B0:56C2 (talk) 20:54, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sigma is not defined

message: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=932699  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.160.54.162 (talk) 13:30, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  should this open acces paper adder to the reference ?
Talk:1. X. 1905

message: John Warrack in the notes to Firkusny's recording of this piece for Deutsche Grammophon claims that he "seized the third movement from the alarmed performer at the final rehearsal".  The accounts agree but I personally don't know if they come from the composer's autobiography? The pianist of the premiere's (Ludmila Tucková)? A witness' account? Schissel | Sound the Note! 12:54, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not stated in the article, and I personally do not know. Brambleclawx
 22:59, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: would it be OK to publish an external link to this beautiful orchestration of 1.X.1905?
http://www.universaledition.com/Leos-Janacek/composers-and-works/composer/2012/work/13092
:No problem, Universal Edition is a reliable music publisher. The information on the orchestration is interesting and it should be surely mentioned in the article. I can't imagine this beautiful piano piece orchestrated. I want to listen to that! :) --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 16:45, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The piece was recorded by the the Netherlands Radio Philharmonic Orchestra conducted by Claus Peter Flor. The recording has been broadcast a few times, but (sadly) has not been released in CD format.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stevey-22 (talk • contribs) 07:39, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

text: Absolutely no problem, feel free to improve the article. Unfortunately I can't find the orchestrated version online. It is very interesting for me, as Leoš Janáček is one of my favourite composers. One of my homes is situated approximately 150 metres from his grave :) --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 08:47, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: The "Structure" section does not discuss the structure at all. It merely tells the names of the two movements.
Either someone with a musicology background should write a section about the structure of the work, or the section should be retitled "Movements" or something similar.
2601:9:2780:1E3:221:E9FF:FEE0:8C3C (talk) 07:23, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Structure section 

message: What is a "renewed premiere"?  The premiere of the first two movements was clearly in 1906 in Brno. The 1924 performance was of the same two movements - it would seem that it was just the 2nd performance (or the 1st in Prague). Davidships (talk) 17:55, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you're right. "renewed premiere" is just an unfortunate phrasing for "second performance". Maybe User:Vejvančický, who created most of the article in May 2008 and used this term, can explain. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 02:01, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I've changed the phrase. I think that back in 2008 I used direct translation of the phrase in my Czech source. The phrasing "renewed premiere" ("obnovená premiéra") is frequently used in Czech language. Btw Michael Bednarek - your surname sounds a bit "Czech" as well... :) Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 10:40, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the explanation and sorting it out. Davidships (talk) 14:39, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Premiere