lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Aura's House

message: The style is currently in need of an overhaul; I'll do it myself — the template was a reminder to me (though if someobne beats me to it I'll not complain). --Mel Etitis  (Μελ Ετητης) 10:03, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean-up needed

message: I am one of the volunteers for Aura's House, so I thought I would add a bit more info about the projects.  However, I'm trying not to make the entry too 'promotional,' rather just informing people of what the site has done so far.  This is my first time editing on Wikipedia, so I'll try to fix the style as I become more familiar with the mark-up language.  Zoemason 23:52, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've gone through the article introducing Wikipedia mark-up and re-organising a little.  The only major change was the removal of details of the samll projects (partly because I was unsure of mentioning individuals and their donations in an encyclopædia, and partly because I assume that the list is likely [hoped] to grow considerably). --Mel Etitis  (Μελ Ετητης) 08:38, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional info

message: Zoemason, thank you for your attention to the neutrality of the article. But it's getting very detailed and promotional. FreplySpang 20:03, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In particular, the use of the 1st person ("Our goal is to...") is unencyclopedic and implies that Wikipedia supports this charity. I tend to be draconian when I clean things up, so it might be better for someone else to take a pass first. FreplySpang 20:06, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: I took all the non relevant dollar information and worked to reword the text so it is not as promotional.  I feel the data is necessary to show the history of Aura's House.  Like any other organization there are key dates for events and for Aura's House these are our key events and dates.  If you have a page that you would suggest is similar and you would like us to follow I would be happy to adjust to a new format, however removal of the text I think is extreme.
Thanks and I look forward to your input.
Mike, Aura's House Partner Mepler 22:37, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reply 
Talk:Gunboat diplomacy

message: Surely the phrase "gunboat diplomacy" originated with the fleet of Matthew Perry?  Has anyone researched this? Slac speak up! 10:09, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Diplomacy

message: Looks like somebody screwed up with the picture HTML code in the current version. Taavihooah (talk) 11:57, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: definately the mathew perry thing with Japan should have its own page in wiki
Anyone else think the paragraph on 'Modern contexts' lacks neutrality in its tone?  Chwyatt 09:00, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure if it's bias, but "The term "gunboat diplomacy" has been superseded in many circles by the more euphemistic "power projection"." is an odd sentence; "Gunboat diplomacy" traditionally is the threat of force, "powere projection" means to actually use force. The example given of CLINTON'S use of the militry during the Yugo Civil Wars shows both terms, diplomacy by the E-3's and projections from Tomahawks. I submit that should be clarified, but I don't really care much. 152.121.19.13 (talk) 03:47, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modern contexts 

message: I hardly think this fits in with the theme of the article at all. Moreover, it looks like original research.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.33.100.29 (talk) 09:35, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  APEC Papua New Guinea 2018
Talk:Hinsdale South High School

message: Hello, I reverted previous edits [ for NPOV. Politepunk 10:20, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverted edits for NPOV 
Talk:Ready Brek

message: I always have my Ready Brek cold (which is much faster to prepare) and can report no ill effects. Stephen B Streater 10:26, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cold

message: They've had at least two notable ones: One was a little plasticine man with big eyes called Ready Eddie, from 1986 to ????. I have a Silver Spoon and Hand Puppet of him that you had to send off for. The one after that was a Red Dragon with the slogan 'central heating for kids'. 78.144.150.65 (talk) 21:19, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Mascots

message: I just removed the uncited reference that this product is aimed at under fives.
It was unsourced and as counter-evidence I offer this advert from 1982 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SVAvA6fP8Xw showing Ready Brek clearly being aimed at school-age children.
I Hate Banner adds (talk) 17:58, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aimed at babies and kids under 5? 

message: This article lacks what for readers who never came into contact with this product would be the most important information: 
What IS this? 
 
What form does the dry product have: Is it tender oat flakes, or a powder, or crumbles (like e.g. some versions of instant coffee/ ~ 'fruit teas'/ ~sahlep); of which colour? 
 
What fluid is it intended to be used with? 
 
What is the prepared stuff like, in texture/consistency and taste? 
 
As someone who does not know the thing, I can only guess, and my guess is, it might be something more or less slimey :-D – which does not have to be bad at all. I do know "normal" (obviously normal for *me* ;-) – I mean flakes made by just mechanically breaking and flattening the oat in a mill, no other processing) squeezed oat flakes and what they become e.g. thrown into (chocolate-) milk or boiled with a little water, but that doesn't tell me what this instant thing is like. 
 
I have read on Wikipedia for example a description of a traditional Asian (relatively thin/ soupy, if I remember correctly) rice 'porridge' or -slime :-) dish, and so can picture that dish in my mind quite well without having grown up with it myself. This kind of information is what I would like to get here, too. 
 
2A02:3031:16:268E:1:2:538D:B17A (talk) 13:19, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Description is missing
Talk:Starofash

message: I think the article meets importance because this person is the vocalist for an internationally known musical project - Peccatum.
i concur</br>
-panasonicyouth99
I concur -80.100.30.125 18:19, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I definitely agree. 100%, for that matter. BacktableSpeak to Meabout what I have done 04:03, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:New Alliance Party

message: This Alaskan page gives Fulani's running mate as "Burke" http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:_8EMDKy_3IYJ:www.gov.state.ak.us/ltgov/elections/partysta.htm  I had thought her running mate was Joyce Dattner.  Did she have more than one running mate in 1988? Esquizombi 10:51, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 1988 running mate

message: This page, along with Fred Newman and Lenora Fulani, are being made POV by advocagtes who are systematically removing most of the critical material. Help is needed to assure that this and the other pages are restored to NPOV status.--Cberlet 00:58, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Page being made POV by advocates

message: Specifically there was an alliance in the early 1970s between the New Alliance Newmann people with Lydon Larouche and the National caucus of Labor Committees, that they (the NAP Neuman group) has always tried to discount and cover up as they are both two sides of the same page. HOW DO I KNOW I WAS THERE the corpus delecti--Xaoskeller (talk) 00:32, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: MORE PAGE BEING MADE POV by advocates 

message: This page is little more than a biased fawning puff piece.  Let's talk about restoring the ample criticisms.--Cberlet (talk) 02:06, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disputed tag 
Talk:Mr Pye

message: I know there's a move against using a period after "Mr", etc., but the title of this book is clearly Mr. Pye and the article should be moved accordingly. 128.151.71.7 (talk) 12:07, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:Teen Age Riot

message: Is there any relationship between this song and the Ataris' "Teenage Riot"? Is one a cover of the other? Could this be cleared up in the article? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by VarunRajendran (talk • contribs) 04:06, March 15, 2006 (UTC).
*I looked up the lyrics to the Ataris song and it's totally different from Sonic Youth's, so they must just be different songs of the same name --Surachit 21:21, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Atari's version is cover?

message: This is claimed to be the only single from Daydream Nation so why in the single list on Sonic Youth's Wikipedia page is the song 'Candle' said to have been a single in 1989? It maybe a song of the same name but I doubt they would do that.
:B-side  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.125.110.223 (talk) 15:59, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: The Single

message: I think this clip deserves more of a write-up. The article already states that SY made it themselves, but maybe a run-down of who appears in it would be a very worthy addition. It's filled with their influences/muses/etc... Mocba! (talk) 03:14, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: The Video?
Talk:Dope

message: And we dare say "Wikipedia is not a dictionary". Alexander 007 11:22, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: March 2006

message: can we get some specifics on this sentence: "Cannabis, cocaine, heroin, or methamphetamine, depending on region and time-period"
The cocaine page does not even mention the word "dope." Shouldn't the cocaine page mention "dope" if dope refers one to the cocaine page?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 17.151.85.43 (talk) 21:00, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: March 2009

message: Dope has nothing to do with being illegal or not.  Pertinent to drugs it has to do with a primary effect being changing thinking.  SSRIs are a dope, for example.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.97.132.197 (talk) 19:30, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nothing to do with illegal
Talk:Fat-tailed gerbil

message: This article needs converting to encyclopedia style third person prose, with removal of prescriptive stuff like "You need to provide your ..." - MPF 11:26, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed and changed the parts with "you" in it. Peter Maas 21:03, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

text: The information itself has no copyright, only the text itself which has not be copied as far as I can tell. The theory and other information here can be read on several website, books and has been discussed on several forums. When you're missing a reference or information you're free to add it. Peter Maas 15:45, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 
Talk:Jeff Pillars

message: This article was originally tagged for merging into John Boy and Billy but contains information that implies the subject is notable outside of that context.  However, the article still reads as if the John Boy and Billy show is the subject's main notable contribution, and so needs cleaning up to address this imbalance. Waggers 11:35, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I've put the filmographies into the correct chronological order (they were upside down) and reworded the intro.  I notice that the previous (anonymous) editor prematurely removed the cleanup tag (although didn't discuss anything here - grrr!) but I won't risk an edit war by replacing it.  I think the only remaining requirement now is to check the links (for example, the Super Mario link goes to the game, not the film). Waggers 11:30, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup
Talk:Robert D. Raiford

message: This article was originally tagged for merging into John Boy and Billy but contains information that implies the subject is notable outside of that context.  However, the article still reads as if the John Boy and Billy show is the subject's main notable contribution, and so needs cleaning up to address this imbalance. Waggers 11:35, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup
Talk:The gadget

message: Was the Pu hollow?  Midgley 11:42, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Hollow

message: So should it not be capitalized: "The Gadget"??? Of course it should be.... right? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.217.199.196 (talk) 13:30, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Second this. The names should be, in order, The Gadget, Little Boy, and Fat Man. --Chr.K. (talk) 09:01, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No. It was a code word designed/designated not to bring attention to the actual device.  Capitalization would have drawn attention.  You can capitalize it post-facto, but not those guys in WWII. 143.232.210.38 (talk) 22:34, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Is gadget not a proper name (an individual bomb)
Talk:Bonnie Pink

message: Why doesn't it mention that she was a nude video model before she was a singer - heck I didn't even know she was a singer, I only ever heard of her as a girl who made a dozen or so nude videos in the 90's.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.133.66.87 (talk) 07:06, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: add that, as long as it's referenced and complies with wikipedia's standardsFoCuSandLeArN (talk) 19:36, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: nude video model?

message: and should be cut down into several sections.FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 19:37, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "history" section is too long 

message: Where she was born - Kyoto or New York? 37.113.19.131 (talk) 10:51, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mess in bio
Talk:Tállya

message: Somethings seems to be wrong in the Demographics section: As of the census of 2001, there are 2205 people residing in the village; 99.7% Magyars, 1.3% Roma, and 0.3% other. That's 101.3 percent all in all. -- Robert Weemeyer 11:56, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Demographics
Talk:List of ships of the line of Denmark

message: What do the numbers mean? --OpenToppedBus - Talk to the driver 12:02, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The number of cannons on each ship. It is a very poor list; no date is given, and some of the names are misspelled. E.g. it is "Løver" (lions). It's not even evident if the list relates to the Dano-Norwegian fleet or the Danish Fleet. Valentinian (talk) 21:25, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:1951 in New Zealand

message: This is my birth year and Triple J certainly didnt exist.. how do ya find time to revert my miniscule corrections while this huge mess is out here? does the end justify the means? do unto others as you would have them do unto you? clearly doesnt apply much, especially to NZ and most especially to local pages. moza 12:04, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: a true verifiable fact asdded once is not vandalism, but lots of false information left on pages could be called spam perhaps? whatever, its unclear why they stay.moza 15:17, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: huh?
Talk:Locomotives of the London, Midland and Scottish Railway

message: I have discovered that there is an existing article Locomotives of the North Staffordshire Railway but it had not been linked to this article. I have now linked it.  Biscuittin (talk) 10:21, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The NSR article contains a complete list of NSR locos. The LMS article contains a list of NSR locos transferred to the LMS. As these are different lists, I have not tried to merge them. Biscuittin (talk) 10:27, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah. This seems logical - the NSR will not have been alone in having withdrawn locos before 1923; perhaps only one or two of the really small companies will have managed to avoid withdrawing locos prior to grouping. Perhaps the LMS article should briefly summarise the inheritance, without going into detail. --Redrose64 (talk) 17:03, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, the current content is inconsistent, with some sections providing more information than others. Biscuittin (talk) 10:32, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  North Staffordshire Railway 

message: So where should the link point to? All your reversion did was restore an unhelpful link to a section that doesn't exist. Maybe you could fix the problem?—ShelfSkewed Talk 13:28, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Great locomotive cull 

message: At the end of the Preservation section there is a single line stating that "A smaller number of pre-grouping locomotives inherited by the LMS have also been preserved". There is no indication where this information came from. Is it possible to identify the source and provide a link to it?
Anotherbigal (talk) 08:31, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think it needs sourcing, there are plenty of examples such as: LMS No. 1000; LMS No. 5031; LMS No. 12322; LMS No. 14010; LMS No. 17916. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 09:10, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Preservation section
Talk:Modern era

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: no consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 01:10, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Modern era →  – Should be renamed to ether Modern period to be consistent with Early modern period and Late modern period. Also consider Modern history. Interstellarity (talk) 01:23, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 5 November 2022 

message: I've restructured this article and significantly trimmed it. Lots of material was simply copied inline without structure and also with careless reference management. The article is substantially smaller, but always references the main article for the given topic. My changes were motivated by maintenacne concerns, but also by worry for recency bias. While the George Floyd problem is part of a big trend in the US, it doesn't deserve six paragraphs here when the 9/11 attacks (and other attacks around the world) received only a mention in a single sentence.
Copied text remains, and probably should be converted to transclusion. -- Mikeblas (talk) 14:24, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I've moved a couple sections to be transcluded. I think this is better, but I remain concerned about this article and its scope. Seems like this should be about the era, not about the specific events in the era. That is, this should describe the times, which includes the effects of and the atmosphere created by the events of the era, not the events themselves. There are other articles for the events -- 2020s, 21st century, and 1998 for example -- no need to enumerate them again. -- Mikeblas (talk) 14:08, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trim, scope, recency 

message: I've tagged this article with  because it represents an almost exclusively US-centeric view and description of the modern era. -- Mikeblas (talk) 14:23, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Globalization

message: I've raised the problems in this and the related articles early modern period, late modern period and modernity in Wikiproject History. Thread can be found here: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject History#Modernity articles are a hot mess
I recommend a joint discussion for all these articles since they seem to suffer from very similar issues. Peter Isotalo 13:53, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Centralized discussion on modernity 

message: The redirect Western era has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Utopes (talk / cont) 01:55, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Western era]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Bill McLaren

message: Please stop adding MBE and OBE after his name. As "If one is appointed to a higher class within the order, one must return one's existing insignia in exchange for the more senior one, and cease using the juniorpost-nominal letters" Quoted from Order of the British Empire  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sacul72 (talk • contribs) 15:49, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Knighthood 

message: I believe he had a quite distinguished war service. 
He also had a daughter who died young which had a profound effect on him. He has an interesting personal history if anyone can help fill it in. Epeeist smudge 12:17, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  War Service & Daughter

message: Am I wrong, or Bill McLaren has been the commentator of the 1997 rugby video game "Jonah Lomu Rugby", with Bill Beaumont? Famous quote: "My goodness, that tackle could have put him in Ward 4" with the punchline by Beaumont: "I hope not, that's a maternity ward"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.48.9.20 (talk) 21:00, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: JLR

message: Someone has really buggered up this article. It's poor stuff.--MacRusgail (talk) 15:08, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: The article could do with some famous quotes by him, e.g. the one about a mad octopus. Also, did he really say 'They'll be dancing in the streets of Auchtermuchty tonight'? 93.96.236.8 (talk) 15:44, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Quotes
Talk:Children's film

message: I'm sure everyone knows the MPAA rating system knows that G means General Audience and that there is no rating that means Kids Only. However, the existence of "children's films" by this article contradicts this. Any clarification for this article?? Georgia guy 21:44, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  G rating 

message: Hi,
I am a student from University of Toronto, and I am doing a Wikipedia assignment for my computer science course. I edited this article in the sandbox I created, and the link to my sandbox is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:MillyChang/sandbox 
In general, I corrected some problems about grammar, spelling, cohesion in the original article.
MillyChang (talk) 00:44, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing Due to Academic Requirement 

message: I often notice that several children films often get negative reviews by critics mainly because they are only targeted towards kids and won't appeal to adults. I would like to add that to the article but I don't know if it's relevant enough. MonkeeJuice 10:08, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: critic reviews about children films

message: oliyewola priscilla oshin was born in 12 september 2001 and is 11  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.251.91.214 (talk) 22:00, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  ayomide oshin 

message: A complete rewrite on Family film and Children's film has been done at User:Robin klein/sandbox/Children's film or Family film.  As per discussion at [] the rewrite on Family Film and Children's Film along with the page Family film and the page Children's film) is to be merged and moved to Children's and Family film. Please help with the merge and move. Thanks Robin klein (talk) 00:06, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite of article and move and merge
Talk:Tvashtr

message: An association to the nordic Kvasir possibly through it's IE connections? 65.102.7.165 (talk) 00:55, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[kvasir]]? 

message: Prof Dr Branislava Bozinovic who spent 40 years in India, proved that Serbian/Russian is Sanskrit because 80% of all words are identical (even bad words)! Now, PURUSHA = DESTROYED at this very root... I have a feeling that all has been set upside down! There are no euro-indian languages, but there is Serbian that is almost identical to Russian : Serbian calndar is one of the oldeset. We live in the Serbian Year 7528 (=2019)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.155.46.15 (talk) 08:56, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: PURUSHA = DESTROYER in Serbian language

message: Like almost all vedic gods (for example Vishnu is Orion, Agni is Aries, Surya is Taurus, Indra is Hercules, Trita is Triangulum, Varuna is Aquarius, Mitra is Delphinus and so on) Tvashtr beneath the person is one of the 48 ancient known constellations, namely Auriga. 2003:F5:F746:F400:58FF:87C1:D9A3:FC2 (talk) 16:52, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tvashtr also is a constellation