lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Iced coffee (Australia)

message: I think that this should be put in as a section of iced coffee, but with the point that the coffee is mixed with milk rather than water in pre-packaged drinks sold in Australia. - Richardcavell 12:08, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The reason I didn't do this is because the other article is referring to a completely different sort of beverage (the method of production and contents are both different).  The only things they have in common are a) they contain coffee, b) they have the same name. I don't think they should be in the same article any more than the various types of plants called mimosa are in the same article. A disambiguation page would not be a bad idea. Robert Brockway 20:47, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion 

message: Since nothing has been said for over a week about the matter and no sources have been cited, I have added the information from this article to the main article at Iced coffee under Iced_coffee#Australia with a  tag after the unsourced text.  I'm going to turn this page into a redirect since the same information is in the Iced coffee article unless there are any objections (i.e. this article can become more than just a stub). — Indi [ talk ] 15:40, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update
Talk:Microsecond

message: could we add that it is sometimes written with the greek symbol μ mu ? Olivier --134.130.140.116 11:22, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:1 E-18 s which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RFC bot 21:49, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in process

message: I removed this uncited dubious entry, because it made no sense ("a fifth"... of what?)
* 4.63 microseconds – a fifth (a 60th of a 60th of a 60th of a second)
feel free to work out what it was supposed to mean, and put it back fixed.
I also removed this;
* 277.8 microseconds – a fourth (a 60th of a 60th of a second), used in astronomical calculations by al-Biruni and Roger Bacon in 1000 and 1267 AD, respectively.
which is also nonsense, and the references did not appear to support it either ("fourth" (and, for that matter, "fifth") were not used in the context of seconds, and every time they were used, it was hyphenated, like "fourth-part", in the context of an actual sentence explaining what it was a part of.
: In reply to User:120.151.160.158 who removed the bits about "fourth" and "fifth" -- I am pretty sure it means 277.8 μs is the result of dividing an hour by 60, four times, or 277.8 = 1 hour / (60 ^ 4). Likewise 4.63 μs = 1 hour / (60 ^ 5). From looking at the Google Books version of the al-Biruni book, I also realized that this follows a logical progression from "seconds" and also explains why one abbreviation for seconds is two little apostrophes. If you will, hour = zeroth. Minute = first. Second = second. 16.667 ms = third. 277.8 μs = fourth. 4.63 μs = fifth. Furthermore, Sexagesimal says 'Until at least the 18th century, 1/60 of a second was called a "tierce" or "third".' Some references are given. I believe that 1 μs is something like 12 sixths, 57 sevenths, 36 eighths.
: Despite figuring this out, I'm not sure how to work this back in to the article. --Officiallyover (talk) 17:05, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: probably should be defined better on the Second#Based_on_subdivisions_of_the_moon_cycle article and linked to that Alanbelllibertus (talk) 15:03, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  nonsense removed
Talk:Guangde

message: Please at least mention which country this county belongs to. It will help sorting the stubs and as such enable speedier expansion of the article. --Soumyasch 11:25, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Web scraping

message: Quote from article: "A web scraper is an Application Programming Interface (API) to [...]" But is this correct? Isn't a web scraper more than just an API? -- 194.39.218.10 (talk) 14:58, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: A web scraper is generally a program. The API aspect in the article is misleading. Have removed it. Jmccormac (talk) 07:23, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "A web scraper is an API" - is this correct?
Talk:Shock the Monkey

message: I'm sorry, where does who get the idea that this song has anything to do with Milgram? Source, please? rjrjr 00:49, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair point, I've not seen any source that states unequivocally that Gabriel was referencing Milgram with the song or even its title, so as part of expanding/infoboxing this article I've modified the wording to say only that some people cite a connection (rightly or wrongly), and that fact can be sourced. Cheers, Ian Rose 16:05, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

message: The Peter Gabriel discography page at Wiki had numerous erroneous chart peaks and was uncited.  I have extensively edited the discography and started a section for discussion of potential factual disagreements on that talk page.  Answers.com is a site that simply mirrors Wiki articles and doesn't independently verify their accuracy.  I happen to know that the free portion of billboard.com is often incomplete and it is possible that it is also occasionally wrong.  RIAA.com is also incomplete.  They list "In Your Eyes" as Gabriel's only Gold or Platinum single, when surely "Sledgehammer" was certified as well, to cite one example.  However, neither our suspicion nor our educated guess, that "Sledgehammer" went Gold, or that a given single charted higher or lower than a previous editor has stated, is enough to add it as fact to the article.  We have to find a source for it first.
One way to find such a source is to discuss any disagreement with cited article content here on the talk page.  If another editor agrees or has their interest piqued, they may help you do your research to prove or disprove your claim.  Chances are that among those reading the talk page for a given subject are people who not only have personal knowledge of the subject but access to legitimate, accurate sources such as (in this case) a trade publication collection or a paid website subscription, and they could not only confirm but cite as fact such suspicions.  (I personally have an extensive collection of '80s and '90s Billboard magazines, but as they are currently inaccessible in storage, I depend upon the free portion of billboard.com for now.  I do not have the 1982 issue(s) that would confirm or deny your suspicions about this particular peak.  I venture to guess you won't be happy to learn that my sources state the UK peak given here was even farther off than the U.S. peak you're debating; instead of #8, it was #58.  The upside of that is, it did better in the larger market of the U.S. than in his native UK.
"Shock The Monkey" is one of my favorite tracks of Gabriel's, of that entire year, and I'd venture to say the whole decade, and it's a shock to learn it wasn't the international pop hit it should have been, or likely would have been a few years later.  I hope my addition of other U.S. chart appearances ameliorates any sense of disappointment or injustice!  Abrazame (talk) 03:17, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chart peaks
Talk:National Heads-Up Poker Championship

message: Not that I don't like the bracket view, but it is going to make this article huge. ♣♦ SmartGuy ♥♠ 14:43, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Brackets

message: the structure of the tourney with its very fast blinds doesn't really allow for skill in play. might not be interesting to lay person watching but i think  it is important to include
::Why? It's really not that notable. --ECWAGuru (talk) 20:36, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flipament 

message: Is it honestly necessary to have both the tournament brackets and the expanded results immediately afterwards? It just seems redundant to me (not to mention it makes the page difficult to look at). --ECWAGuru (talk) 20:38, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: True. One of them should go. -Koppapa (talk) 13:29, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: IMO, the brackets are far nicer-looking. JaeDyWolf ~ Baka-San (talk) 22:46, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Results
Talk:Guilty Pleasures (novel)

message: I've rated this as a start class article.  IMHO, the article needs:
#Info for other releases
#Other covers
#More detailed description of minor characters
#Links to any verifiable reviews
#An overall check for any other items missing from the template
#Work out disambiguation issues with Guilty Pleasures.
I know that we don't normally edit other's text, but please feel free to add or strike items above and add a note below regarding any amendments. TheronJ 16:06, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: To do

message: * Added disambiguation note. TheronJ 16:16, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes regarding amendments to list
Talk:Rebecca Riggs

message: Rebecca Riggs of Farscape is a different actress to actress Rebecca Rigg.
Rebecca Riggs is not married to actor Simon Baker.  Simon Baker's wife is Rebecca Rigg. 
Unfortunately, because of the similarity of their names, these two Australian actresses are being continually mistaken for each other, including by the Internet Movie Database, where the two actresses have been largely credited with each other's roles.  Efforts have been made to bring this matter to the attention of IMDb, but nothing has been done as yet about the problem to correct it.
Although their names are very similar, the two actress are totally different from each other in appearance. Figaro 13:38, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ipswich Motorway

message: can you cycle on this motorway? I am considering riding to work from macgregor to oxley, but the only route that is within a good distance (11km) goes along this motorway, Thanks.--115.64.208.203 (talk) 16:54, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Some exits on the motorway have been closed permanently according to the government. These include the Chalk Street exit Outbound at Redbank and the Brisbane Road exit Inbound at Redbank. These are the only exits (to my knowledge) that have been permanently closed so far. The McEwan/Tessman Street intersection at Riverview is also slated for closure within the next year (2011). I would remove them myself from the table, but that template doesn't like me for some reason. Jdenm8 (talk) 02:28, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Exit Closures

message: The TMR reference map shows the transition from Ipswich Road to Ipswich Motorway as occurring immediately to the south of the Kenway Street intersection in Rocklea. This is shown as the end point for Ipswich Road in its article. This article needs changing to match.
While the TMR list of roads shows road U16 ending at Goodna the reference map shows it ending in Gailes, concurrent with the change from M7 to M2. I have shown it as Goodna in the article, as it is possibly correct, eg. it might end at the Gailes / Goodna boundary (Woogaroo Creek). Downsize43 (talk) 23:01, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extent of this road
Talk:Knights Templar today

message: The AfD on this article has closed, the result was merge, per Elonka's suggestion to split the content between four different articles. I have no specialist knowledge about this topic, so I'll leave the merging to the people watching this article. --bainer (talk) 00:57, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the admin cleanup.  I'll go ahead and keep an eye on the article content, since I've been re-reading all my Templar books lately. :)  --Elonka 19:49, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: AfD closed
Talk:Victoria Park, Glasgow

message: I'll add more to this later; need to go out otherwise I'd do it now. If anyone else wants to make a start:
http://www.glasgowmuseums.com/venue/index.cfm?venueid=2
http://www.gnws.co.uk/glasgow/park/victoria.htm
http://www.glasgow.gov.uk/en/Residents/Parks_Outdoors/Parks_gardens/victoriapark.htm
I used to play Ultimate there when I was at Uni so I have a fair idea of its location, size etc. Nach0king 12:57, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Ajisukitakahikone

message: See Aji-Shiki - could this be another name of this deity ? If so, it might be worth to merge both lemmas. ----Erkan Yilmaz 19:16, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: merge ?

message: While doing some research with the hope to add some citations into Shinto related stubs on here, I discovered the Aji-Shiki page and was working on it. However, it appears, based on the Japanese wikipedia page (ja:アヂスキタカヒコネ), that Aji Shiki is just another name for Ajisuki per the opening sentence of the article. Also, I found that story about the same Ame Waka Hiko under a book using the Aji Shiki name. Therefore, I am suggesting a merge of the two articles. LlamaDude78 (talk) 14:03, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger Proposal

message: How the heck this god is a child of Okuninushi ( a Kunitsukami ) and brother to Take-mikazuchi ( born from Izanagi's blood and an Amatsukami ) at the same moment, without even being Izanami's child? --151.97.150.236 (talk) 14:46, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uhm 

message: This page is formed off by two different deities, and merged because of some kind of error!
* Take-mikazuchi, Raijin and Amaterasu are brothers ( They all are born from some parts of Izanagi! )
* Ninigi-no-Mikoto is the Grandson  of Amaterasu. He later descended from the Heaven to Izumo and substituted Okuninushi as ruler of Izumo
* Okuninushi isn't related to Izanagi or Izanami, neither their childrens 
As such, there are two gods forming this page
* The one brother to Take-mikazuchi and Raijin, born from Izanagi
* The one who is the child of Okuninushi
That are both pretty obscure, but different gods! --151.97.144.245 (talk) 08:18, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unmerge the two different deities.
Talk:Emergency Action Message

message: It should be mentioned that the photo is from the movie "Crimson Tide" and is not a photo of a genuine EAM.
Basesurge (talk) 01:14, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo

message: Someone recently pointed me to a broadcast and told me it was an EAM. It wasn't in digital mode. It was someone saying something in the NATO phonetic alphabet. It was just random letters, but it was certainly not digital mode.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.35.197.10 (talk) 16:49, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Digital mode? 

message: Hello all!
From reading the source that was cited, Skyking messages and EAM messages are both sent to nuclear forces. If that can be confirmed by other sources or knowledgeable folks, I would suggest that this portion be clarified. EAMs are described as being the orders to nuclear forces, and Skyking messages ones which can override them... but as someone totally unfamiliar, I immediately wondered what the heck could be more of a priority than orders to nuclear forces. 
Also, I would suggest another source be found. The one given is a PDF written by a radio enthusiast and has several very significant typos causing contradictions. Again as an outsider, it seems to have very little credibility.
Stay warm, stay safe
Liastnir (talk) 22:12, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relationship between Skyking and EAM
Talk:Kunado-no-Kami

message: A phallic god? Where the hell does that kinda nonsense come from? Alas, I smell the, erm, inovative reinterpretations of fact by pantheon.org or youkaimura.com behind this. Will look into this and rewrite it. For the time being, I'll delete the phallic nonsense, though. TomorrowTime 19:55, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phallic?
Talk:2002 FIFA World Cup hosting controversy

message: There are so many things unrelated to the naming dispute.--Mochi 13:05, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you name which ones and then we can edit them appropriately? I've already taken out the reference to the ticketing problem.--Sir Edgar 23:41, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Shouldn't this article be named Football World Cup 2002 hosting controversy? CG 13:32, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: I just did lots of work the the external links, which should make the article more accurate.
HaloPwnage 01:33, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: This article has been fixed
Talk:Daikokuten

message: What is it?--Dangerous-Boy 09:22, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indian counterpart? 

message: I read that he is identified to the shinto Okuninushinomikoto, and indeed their attributes are the same (mallet, headdress). Should be mentioned in both articles (I'll try to dig up a ref.)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.107.163.49 (talk) 11:39, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  okuninushi no mikoto 

message: I'm finding that deities such as Fudo Myoo and others are getting absorbed into the original Hindi names and finding this very cumbersome when I do the editing.  As indicated by preceding talk topics, this deity whose name Daikoku means "great black", has his origins in Mahakala, the great black destructive aspect of shiva. But he has been naturalized in Japan beyond recognition, and also conflated with Ohkuninushi (as mentioned in previous topic), because Daikoku could also be written in a way that can be pronounced Ohkuni.  I may not work on this article at this time, but this pieced of information is definitely stated in certain books I've examined. Kiyoweap (talk) 09:09, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do not try to merge this with Mahakala 

message: daikokuten is mixture of Shinto and the Buddhism. 220.96.4.14 (talk) 22:37, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  daikokuten is mixture of Okuninushi and Shiva. 
Talk:Hachiman

message: Did Hachiman actually exist?--Splashen (talk) 16:21, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Historical Person?

message: An article that you have been involved in editing, Hachiman_Shrine , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going , and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Jrhoadley (talk) 03:25, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge discussion for [[Hachiman_Shrine]]

message: The article reads like it has been literally translated from Japanese. It's beyond my purview to fix it, but several sections are ungrammatical and/or unclear. 99.116.23.134 (talk) 00:23, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article English quality
Talk:Upington

message: I'm busy with a mjor overhaul for this page.
=== All ready done: ===
*Infobox
*Introduction
*History
*Geography
=== Currently busy with: ===
*Demographics
*Economy
*Tourism
*Communications and media
*Sport
*Education
*Transport
ETA for completion: 10-05-2009 martiens (talk) 14:16, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major overhaul 

message: *Demographics
*Economy
*Tourism
*Communications and media
*Sport
*Education
*Transport
ETA for completion: 10-05-2009 martiens (talk) 14:16, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Currently busy with: 

message: Beefart says. The dates in the first sentences are in conflict. Can somebody please resolve and provide a citation? Thanks. Captainbeefart 13:23, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Conflicting dates

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). (See Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2010 May 15.) Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:29, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: Unless someone provides demographic information about Upington (not it's municipality) then I will delete the demographic section, since that information should only be used on the article of the municipality unless used for comparison on this page. Bezuidenhout (talk) 23:03, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I think removing it is a good idea. It is highly unlikely that we will see future census data for individual towns/cities as it is all done on municipal level. --NJR_ZA (talk) 05:17, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Then how did people get demographic information at Stilfontein or Vanderbijlpark (see their demographic sections). Bezuidenhout (talk) 08:20, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Demographics
Talk:Kagu-tsuchi

message: The current title of "Kagu-tsuchi" is incorrectly hyphenated.  Etymologically, this name comes from three parts: kagu, an Old Japanese root verb meaning "to shine"; tsu, the Old Japanese possessive particle; chi, an Old Japanese root meaning "force, power".  If hyphenated at all, this would be "Kagu-tsu-chi".  However, rather that this is a name, and is treated as an integral term, I propose moving this to Kagutsuchi.  -- Eiríkr Útlendi │ Tala við mig 16:30, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed move
Talk:Ninigi-no-Mikoto

message: Hyphenation introduced in this edit seems wrong.
Ninigi's god name is consisted of these parts: [Ame(heaven)-nigishi(prospers)]-[kuni(land)-nigishi(prospers)]-amatsuhiko(heavenly god)-hiko(male god)-ho(rice, meaning he's a god of harvest)-no-Ninigi(name)-no-Mikoto(honorific), where two "no" are separators between the modifiers, name and honorific. --61.12.236.42 (talk) 07:26, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong hyphenation

message: The page tells us his parents, and that he's a Grandson of the Sun Goddess.  But it doesn't say which parent was her kid.--JaredMithrandir (talk) 02:54, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'd like to know more about his Genealogy?
Talk:Gynocriticism

message: This word is malformed according to the morphology of the Greek language. AnonMoos 13:26, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Without a reliable source to say so, that would be original research. Robofish (talk) 16:32, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Talk:Ōyamatsumi

message: (Just moved article from "Ōhoyamatsumi", to which the following applies.)
According to the Japanese entry, which is likely to be reliable, the name of this entity is the obvious reading (spelling out the kana syllables):
O-o-ya-ma-tsu-mi. The 'h' is no doubt a trace of the informal (and actually quite idiotic) Romanisation scheme in which "long vowels" are written by appending 'h'. (Idiotic, because it's impossible to tell if the 'h' is simply the start of the next syllable.) Since Wikipedia uses macrons in conventional Hepburn Romanisation, the title should be: Ōyamatsumi. If some historical document includes an anomalous version this could be mentioned, but only if the name has somewhere caught on in English contexts. Imaginatorium (talk) 06:34, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mysterious 'h' in the title
Talk:Proto-Ionians

message: Apart from the Faucounau stuff, "Proto-Ionians" seems to be a bona fide term in historical discussions on the Origin of the Greeks in the 1880s to 1920s period. This probably doesn't merit treatment in a standalone article but should become part of a larger discussion of the "Origin of the Greeks". --dab (𒁳) 14:27, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability