lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ballyronan

message: I've tried to rewrite this article using the guidelines set out by WP:UKCITIES. Unfortunately the NINIS site is not online at the moment. I think I heard on Newsline a couple of weeks ago that it had been hacked. Hopefully it will be online soon, as obviously the Demography section is a bit lacking! I'm not sure if there is much available information for history - if nothing can be found we can just scrap that header anyway. 
To Derry Boi: See my edit summary for my last edit to Ballyronan for the POV concerns ;-) 
Regards, EJF (talk) 20:29, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Good job. Article certainly looks a lot better after your clean up. Also noticed NINIS was down myself, but I remember from past experience that they didn't have data for Ballyronan anyway, cause it has less than 500 people. But I think you can get info for any settlement if you contact them directly, not sure where you do this though. Derry Boi (talk) 22:03, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There seems to be an e-mail address on the NISRA site for queries for information not on the website. I think I'll e-mail NISRA on Monday to ask if they are willing to disclose some of their stats for Ballyronan. I think the Freedom of Information Act should cover such a request. The only problem with using the stats would be the "original research" aspect. I suppose the ref will have to be something like 1. Information provided by NINIS to User:EJF via e-mail under Freedom of Information Act 2000. Information accessed 2008-03-01   But I suppose I'll cross that bridge when I come to it! I've dropped a note on Ardfern's talk page, as he appears to have got pop. stats for small villages like Killinchy in the past. EJF (talk) 23:04, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite - Need info on Demography! 

message: This article will have to be monitored on a more frequent basis-some of the edits are totally pointless.DColt (talk) 18:15, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Random and irrelevant information. 
Talk:Banagher Horse Fair

message: ------------------------------------------------
I just deleted some one-sided comments ("Long reign the horsefair"), that were violating Wikipedia's striving for being neutral. Still, this whole article fails to explain why the Irish government would want to shut down a historic horsefair. Were there problems about the health or safety of the horses? Did animal rights protesters from big cities get involved? If so, what arguments did they have? Why could protester's arguments be legitimate? What sort of arguments plead in favour of the supporters of the horse-fair? Did the supporters of the horsefair try to register their event as cultaral heritage on the Unesco-list of endangered traditions? The article reads as promotion for the horsefair and protest against the Irish government and/or people from big cities like Dublin. This article fails to meet the criteria of an entry in an encyclopedia! Please help to improove.
--------------------------------------------------  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.233.148.29 (talk) 20:59, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
Talk:Whole-body vibration

message: It seems to me there are two different thing going on in the article.  One is just whole body vibration as a phenomena that may be work related and have certain effects on the body.  The other is some kind medicine or therapy thing, possibly alternate or complimentary.  Might it be reasonable to separate the article into two different ones, dealing with each?  I'd keep the name for the work-related one, and add (Therapy) or some such for the second. Rjmail (talk) 01:09, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know if it makes sense, because then you'd have to add a third one related to WBV exercise or workout.--Gciriani (talk) 03:09, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I was thinking one would be dedicated to the effects from the environment, and the other would be on WBV used as a therapy or whatever.Rjmail (talk) 15:00, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

text: It looks like there were already two articles, one was Vibration training, which then has been merged.--Gciriani (talk) 15:46, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that is unfortunate. Rjmail (talk) 15:48, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the distinction is pretty clear in the current article layout. Mikael Häggström (talk) 06:30, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  WBV types 

message: Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) should apply to this article, and there are a great multitude of reviews/secondary sources for this topic. When looking at ones made during the last 6-7 years I found these:
*Whole-body vibration platform training in patients with neurodegenerative diseases (Cochrane 2012)
*Whole body vibration training for adults with fibromyalgia (Cochrane 2017)
*Whole body vibration in sport: a critical review (J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2014)
*Whole body vibration and athletic performance: A scoping review (EurJHM 2014)
*I also think the Mayo Clinic article is a good source: Is whole-body vibration a good way to lose weight and improve fitness? (2017)
*And for occupational exposure: Low back pain among farmers exposed to whole body vibration: a literature review
Thus, I think we should use these reviews to replace all primary sources that fall within the same scope. Also, is there any other relatively recent review that would be fitting? Mikael Häggström (talk) 16:37, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Mikael Häggström (talk) 15:01, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replacing with reviews 

message: After applying the same principles as in section above, not enough material remained in those articles to justify a wp:fork from here, so I merged them to here. Mikael Häggström (talk) 15:47, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge from [[Power Plate]] and [[Galileo (vibration training)]]

message: It is a moot point whether there should be an hyphen between whole and body. Arguments for no hyphen: that is what I see in the article lede at this moment; this page on the HSE website spells it once with an hyphen and four times without. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:44, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hyphen or not
Talk:Barn United F.C.

message: Roberto Carlos 62.74.61.114 (talk) 18:16, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roberto Carlos
Talk:Trope (philosophy)

message: Who says? Trope theory seems to be its own thing, or there are those with nominalist or realist leanings within the approach. It would be nice if someone who knew more about this could revise it.184.77.32.182 (talk) 04:10, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trope theory in analytic ontology a branch of nominalism? 

message: Is WikiProject Philosophy written just for technical, analytical or academic philosophers or does it seek to capture the entire range of philosophical experience/history for an encyclopedic audience? If the latter, it might be good to write some "hooks" into this article on the trope entries on literature, music, religion and mathematics, or even to combine several of these entries into a single composite entry.
Ralohmann (talk) 12:54, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Just for Philosophers?
Template talk:Pantera

message: I'm surprised that Pantera's three videos are summed up in one article like this. As though they only made one video, just because they happened to re-release them all on one combined DVD at a later date. It's like having one article for Rambo or Star Wars because those trilogies were later marketed as single discs.--Jeff79 (talk) 12:32, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Rambo and Star Wars do have one article, along with an article for each film in their respective series. No one has yet gone to the trouble of making an article for each Pantera video, though. Nufy8 (talk) 16:56, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  3 Vulgar Videos from Hell????
Talk:West Virginia National Guard

message: #1) Regarding the insignia in the information box on the right labeled "Identification Symbol:"
A) There is no such thing as an "Identification Symbol"
B) That is the Distinctive Unit Insignia of the WV Army National Guard Element, Joint Force Headquarters, and it should be used in the body of article to replace the insignia described next in #2.
#2) Regarding the image in the body text directly under the subhead "Organization" of main section "WV Army National Guard" (image has a musket, axe, and powder horn)
This is the insignia of the WV National Guard, which comprises both the WV _Army_ National Guard and the _Air Force_ National Guard. It should be used in the Info box described in #1 above.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by MrStiv (talk • contribs) 19:13, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transposed Insignias
Talk:Belfast quarters

message: Why is this not included?Mooretwin (talk) 22:30, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Linen Quarter 

message: Infecting Wikipedia with the pretensions of the developers in Belfast? I'd laugh at that, but then I noticed how they've spelled "February". So I'm laughing at that instead.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.170.59.212 (talk) 22:40, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Grim, grim, grim
Talk:Adequate remedy

message: I added some information regarding Adequate remedy and change this to full article from the stub article. Feel free to discuss if there is more information to add or change. Thank you --Mr.priono (talk) 03:58, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

message: Nazi Germany was defeated in 1945,at the end of world war || in reaction to the terrible violence of the war,world leaders met to discuss how to promote a better world through international co operation.in 1946 a world 🌍 was called united nations organisation was formed. 41.116.233.178 (talk) 16:59, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The United Nations Organization
Talk:Bishop of Kilmore

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was moved to Bishop of Kilmore, as no actual objections have been raised. Aervanath (talk) 12:52, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Diocese of Kilmore (Church of Ireland) → Bishop of Kilmore — The article was originally titled Bishop of Kilmore but was moved to Bishop of Kilmore (Church of Ireland), then I moved it to Diocese of Kilmore (Church of Ireland). In the meantime Bishop of Kilmore has become a disambig page. I've been going through the Irish bishop articles and am trying to create some consistency with them - Archbishop of Cashel, Bishop of Derry, Bishop of Killaloe, etc., they all include the pre-Reformation, Church of Ireland and Roman Catholic bishops. The article now includes the pre- and post-Reformation bishops. Could you please move Diocese of Kilmore (Church of Ireland) back to Bishop of Kilmore, its original place. Thanks. - Scrivener-uki (talk) 22:32, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move? 
Talk:Black Mountain (Belfast)

message: Hello! During late June, July and some of August, I'm working on a paid project sponsored by the National Trust to review and enhance coverage of NT sites. You can find the pilot edits here, as well as a statement and contact details for the National Trust. I am leaving this message when I make a first edit to a page; please do get in touch if you have any concerns. Lajmmoore (talk) 13:44, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  National Trust pilot
Talk:Eiffel Forum License

message: Since the license requires copies of itself to be distributed with all works licensed under it, we may assume that it may be freely distributed verbatim, and hence may be included in Wikipedia without copyright infringement. Moreover, the more widely distributed a license's text is, the better it is for that license.
I have changed the wording about how the licence may be included to de-bias the position that CC/OSI licences carry any special legal weight.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.75.128.182 (talk) 13:10, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Bohola

message: There is no red-light district in Bohola.  The picture and references are from Amsterdam.  The crime rates are also incorrect and should be removed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.80.54.192 (talk) 17:01, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bonniconlon, County Mayo

message: Recent edits have removed the (unsourced) sentence "Bonniconlon was previously within the bounds of County Sligo, when the Sligo border went as far as one shore of the Moy in Ballina". On investigation, I believe this removal was justified (albeit lacking elaboration in edit summaries or on Talk). The sentence was partly correct: the Sligo border did formerly extend to the Moy. But this did not, I believe, include the Bonniconlon area. 
The county border redrawing took place under the Local Government (Ireland) Act 1898. Three electoral districts/divisions (ED) were transferred from Sligo: Ardnaree North, Ardnaree South Rural and Ardnaree South Urban. If the ED boundaries have not changed then all three EDs are on the River Moy. But Bonniconlon is/was in Kilgarvan ED.
The site mayo-ireland.ie appears to be a scholarly resource for Mayo history. Their main Bonniconlon history page doesn't mention county boundaries, although covering those years. The site also includes an extract from Samuel Lewis' Topographical Dictionary (1831). It says: "...KILGARVIN, a parish, in the barony of Gallen, county of Mayo...". Kilgarvin has long been the (civil) parish/electoral division including Bonniconlon. And was formerly the village name.
Other resources mention/question Bonniconlon having been in Sligo, such as the Ireland Byways blog in their section on Bonniconlon. The blog seems well-researched but the county boundary issue could well be WP:CIRCULAR.
I'm leaving these notes both out of interest and in case the subject crops up again. Declangi (talk) 02:21, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formerly in County Sligo?
Talk:Right to work

message: Ummm... how is prohibiting discrimination based on property ownership an inherently fascist belief? Shouldn't such a claim point to references that makes that argument.
Also, if Adolf Hitler, Benito Mussolini and Joseph Stalin all championed the idea of prohibiting discrimination on the basis of property ownership, shouldn't there be citations supporting that? Links to published writings or speeches in which they did so.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.210.127.1 (talk) 07:02, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Unconstitutionally social misbehaviour of being a capitalist nation lacks in lawful employment.
Greed for property and being a human. Refer: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Right_to_property
Put the greed for property in an empty body and adopt social behaviour. "Government is an empty body".Work for an empty body named as "Government".
Unemployment is unlawful categorized under unconstitutional."None should be unsatisfied by employment".
Being human does not mean that people have humanity unless they follow.Unless the right to work is given to all people there is inhumanity.
A country develops socially by the "People" and not by an "Individual/Personal".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 106.67.61.7 (talk) 09:23, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pretend to be constitutionally employed. 

message: To agree is to love and be happy  that means you love the idea and you don't have any fault against it 
Types of agreement 
1 Frensham
2 Good will 105.112.69.253 (talk) 05:46, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Agreement
Talk:London Controlling Section

message: My grandfather, who was in the US military (Army Intelligence), was in what he called the "London Control Section", a joint British/American group that did things like the "Bodyguard of Lies". I am thinking that the "London Controlling Section" may have been the command for the British side of the London Control Section. I'll have to dig up my copy of "Bodyguard of Lies" to check. Allens (talk) 13:53, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: From his letter, it sounds like he was part of Operation Bodyguard. Fascinating times. If you're looking to start an article, one on Bevan would be a good one! Verne Equinox (talk) 22:45, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  Operation Bodyguard? Oh, yes - part of the Man Who Never Was scheme (he and several other people were combined into one for the film, IIRC), for one thing. (Operation Mincemeat needs listing under Operation Bodyguard, BTW; will have to work on that.) He also knew about a mission organized by the London Control Section (but wasn't directly part of) in which they sent skitroops and SEAL-equivalents to Scandinavia to intercept a heavy-water shipment that was meant for the German atomic bomb effort. I strongly suspect he went to his grave with things he couldn't tell about, given that he was part of gathering data on the German atomic bomb effort, among other things. Allens (talk) 01:27, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  London Control Section? 
Talk:Patriotismo metro station

message: Please see the proposal at Talk:Metro Chilpancingo for an example of a different infobox to use in these Mexico City Metro articles. 67.86.64.52 (talk) 22:34, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  infobox 

message: The veracity of the sentence "Metro Patriotismo is also known as the station where four transsexuals were murdered in 2006" contained in the article is dubious, as I will explain in the two points below.
1. This information is not in the citation given, the cited article is actually about a photographic exhibition regarding same sex couples held in Centro Médico station, not even in Patriotismo station, although they belong to the same line, Line 9.
2. After thoroughly searching for news or articles about this murder, nothing was found, leading to the conclusion that this is just 
false information, since it could not be proven to be true by any references.
Therefore, I will proceed to remove this sentence (and its reference) from the article.
—Cocu15 (talk) 16:55, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed false information
Talk:Let's Have a Party

message: Some time ago, I split the information about the rag of the same name into an article of its own. Graham87 07:49, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Article split
Talk:The "Hitler Myth"

message: I created an article Hitler (Kershaw books) so we can add information about all of Kershaw's books related to the Nazi regime. At the moment only two of his books have articles. Why not mention all of them in one article?--OZZY19455 (talk) 15:56, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Nice idea for an article, OZZY19455. Though I wonder about the practicality of a merge since this article is now pretty long. Would content be lost? Would it create a WP:WEIGHT problem in the target article? Also why is this article not linked to from the other? There is nothing wrong with two articles, if that is what is required by the length of the content. But if you think it can be merged and no real loss of content, that is OK also.  -- GreenC 17:09, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  It's my first article. I want the article to be predominantly about Ian Kershaw's two-volume biography of Adolf Hitler. However, I also would like it to include all of his other books that are about the Nazi period. If you could contribute to my article then I would be forever grateful.--OZZY19455 (talk) 21:06, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I do not think that the articles should be merged, since "The 'Hitler Myth'" has a significance and impact quite apart from Kershaw's excellent biographies.  In any case, if you're serious about a merger, you should make a formal merger request. See WP:Merge.  Beyond My Ken (talk) 01:26, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Beyond My Ken, I think you are right. I think the article I created should be only about Ian Kershaw's two-volume biography and only briefly mention the other books he has written about the Nazi regime. What do you think of the article I created at the moment?--OZZY19455 (talk) 20:52, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I haven't yet given it close attention, but right off the bat I'd say that you should have a section about the 2008 one-volume abridgment Hitler: A Biography, with a new preface, focusing on the ways in which it differs from the two-volume version. Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:49, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for your recommendation. I created a section about the abridged volume. If you have any spare time and you are willing to then I would like it if you could help me expand and improve the article.--OZZY19455 (talk) 17:26, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge this article into my new article
Talk:2007 Kenya riots

message: One more end-of-year crisis in Africa, after:
*Chad in Dec. 2005 and
*Somalia in Dec. 2006--TheFEARgod (Ч) 13:26, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

message: "2007 Kenya riots" is not a very good title for this page. For starters, the riots are likely going to persist into early 2008, and for seconds, "2007 Kenya riots" provides no information as to whether the riots are about a football match or a disputed election result. Unless someone objects, I'll probably rename this page on the morning of Jan 1st. if my pessimistic predition holds true Brianski (talk) 13:43, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK let's keep 2007 by then. What was you thinking to add? Maybe 2007 post-election riots in Kenya?--TheFEARgod (Ч) 13:55, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This article is too short and lacks specifity. I suggest we merge it with the presidential electron results article, with the heading aftermath. It would look better then and would be more adaptable. ALSO, I dislike the entire style and tone of the article. It doesn't sound right when I read it. It feels more like a news report transcript, not an article.JoshHuzzuh  Talk  16:08, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  title 

message: I have merged this article with the presidential election results. JoshHuzzuh  Talk  16:28, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I would prefer that we restore this article. The riots can't be properly covered in detail in an article on the election. Everyking (talk) 19:09, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Merging makes sense to me for two reasons - First, the two are inextricably linked. Second, the news is breaking, and making decisions about what will is encyclopedic will require a little bit of time to elapse for historical perspective. That said, at some point it will perhaps make sense to revive this page Brianski (talk) 16:17, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course they are linked, but the riots are a major topic in their own right and need a separate article for comprehensive coverage. We don't need "historical perspective" to see what is considered notable by Kenya and the world right now. Everyking (talk) 16:54, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merged

message: I'd also prefer to have a separate article for the riots, and the article should be named 2007–2008 Kenyan SOMETHING -- either "protests" or "riots" or "demonstrations" or ... —Nightstallion 02:02, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: For those who care, it's re-split at Clashes in Kenya (2007–present). —Nightstallion 12:57, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Title and merge
Talk:Brown Bag Films

message: This company seems notable, but the body of the article looks more like promotional material than it does something from an encyclopedia. 184.144.167.152 (talk) 04:37, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  advertising 

message: Whole article could do with better third party refs Dakinijones (talk) 19:17, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  History section lacking refs
Talk:Bruff RFC

message: Page is duplicated with better material under Bruff R.F.C.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dickler (talk • contribs) 00:01, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well spotted. I have redirected the article to Bruff R.F.C.. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 01:01, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplication