lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Bernard II, Duke of Saxony

message: "Though he was a critical ally of the Danes, so fundamental to Henry's wars in the Low Countries, Bernard was on the brink of rebellion until the death of Adalbert. The remainder of his reign, however, was quiet." Well, Bernard died 1059 and Adalbert 13 year later, in 1072. All in wrong order. Or?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hilmer B (talk • contribs) 09:05, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Strange Statement
Talk:Tropical Storm Carrie (1972)

message: This article is now the topic-of-the-day (today's "featured article") for 09-03-2022.  In context, the article states: "In general, damage from Tropical Storm Carrie and its extratropical remnants was light."    Gee old weather data is NOT important, especially with almost zero impact.  Not really anything I find of human interest or historical significance. This "Climate Change" mentality on mainstream articles in WP is one reason I no longer support WP.  I have many other issues, but IMO this weather-related article needs to die and WP needs to offer "featured articles" relevant to  something that still impacts today's society.   WP has done better in my past experience, and I might contribute again as soon as soon as they get their act together.     WP is political, and when the day comes when I feel it is balanced, I will contribute again.     Most "featured article"s seem to be picked at random.   IMO focus on relevance to today.   
 --2600:6C48:7006:200:B056:6066:1296:EF0B (talk) 00:28, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:   Is this all you got for Article of the Day?  

message: Is there any more impact? The only damage mentioned is a collapsed structure, but that alone wouldn't total to over $1 million (1972 USD). 3 people died from boating accidents, but was it from collisions, rough seas, or something else? All sources need to be converted to . It needs a good copyedit, but all in all, not too bad for a storm in this time period. Hurricanehink (talk) 18:26, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll cpe soon as for the Cite Web, no dice (too complcated, looks like a confusing mess when seen in edit mode, easy to forget what to put this and that every time). Storm05 18:45, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, but you'll have to learn how to do it eventually. It's not too complicated when you learn each thing. First,  without having to put the entire cite web back in. Then, start the template for cite web by putting  after the url, and  at the end of the reference. All together, that example would look like this.  It seems complicated, but once you try it and get used to it, it's easy. Hurricanehink (talk) 18:54, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

text: "No significant impact" says it is a waste of time to even read it.   Thank you WP for posting this trash - unimportant and not relevant even today. DeRavenSay (talk) 00:42, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Todo
Talk:Bernard Walther

message: I'm not entirely sure which one should be the correct title, but this article is a duplicate of Bernhard Walther, and some merging should definitely occur. Carom 22:00, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, but it was merged in the wrong direction. Article title is Bernard; first line is, correctly, Bernhard.David Brooks (talk) 20:24, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Now fixed. David Brooks (talk) 22:21, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Now we have Talk:Bernard Walther (here) and Talk:Bernhard Walther. -- Matthead  Discuß   22:38, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed Merge
Talk:Rebel Yell (song)

message: "Rebel L" video could be found at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VjbpuK_H2VY (at least on 6-8-07  --Bridgemo 02:42, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: While that might be true, need I remind you, No original research. Segin (talk) 07:30, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

message: I find it odd that the various track listings and chart ratings for the cover by Scooter would appear on this page. It just doesn't look right. It should be cut and moved to a separate article. Segin (talk) 07:33, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scooter cover 

message: 2021 they used the song in the Trailer for Call of Duty: Black Ops: OUTBREAK TRAILER
Source (Official YouTube for Call of Duty): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHBzHS87w6k
Munchman1984 (talk) 06:10, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another for In Popular Culture.
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Dominican Republic

message: I'd appreciate your input on this topic to resolve some long disputed issues about modern Taino movements. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Taíno#Request_for_Comment_on_Modern_Taino_Identity Poketama (talk) 22:49, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  RFC on modern Taino people 

message: Quality assessments by Wikipedia editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a  parameter to , which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.
No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to , and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.
However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass  a new  parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 16:50, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Project-independent quality assessments 

message: Hello WikiProject Dominican Republic: 
WikiProject Women in Green is holding a  month-long Good Article Edit-a-thon event in October 2023!
Running from October 1 to 31, 2023, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) edit-a-thon event with the theme Around the World in 31 Days! All experience levels welcome. Never worked on a GA project before? We'll teach you how to get started. Or maybe you're an old hand at GAs – we'd love to have you involved! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films) during the event period. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least 31 countries (or broader international articles) by month's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts. 
We hope to see you there!
Grnrchst (talk) 12:57, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Women in Green's 5th Edit-a-thon
Talk:Sex and the City (newspaper column)

message: This page is misnamed. This book is not a novel; it is a collection of semi-autobiographical essays.
I'd suggest moving the page from "Sex and the City (novel)" to "Sex and the City (book)".
99.226.49.67 (talk) 06:37, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I completely agree. I'm going to move it, now. -Sky Blu 2 (talk) 21:42, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Book

message: Appling me 203.171.108.24 (talk) 05:50, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Xnxx.com
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Korea/Assessment

message: I think this doesn't provide enough detail; it feels weird to mark so many articles as "low importance."  Thinking of a new scale like this:
1st class.  A key entry point to Coreana.  (= current "Top")  Examples:  Korea, Korean Peninsula, North Korea, South Korea.
2nd class.  High-profile or central articles.  Includes individuals with a very high international profile, primary administrative divisions, keystone articles for major categories.  Examples:  Seoul, Economy of North Korea, Ban Ki-moon.
3rd class.  Major topics.  Includes higher-profile individuals, most secondary administrative divisions, any category-main articles.  Examples:  Gyeongju, Korean name.
4th class. High granularity, covering a small topic area.  Includes lower-profile individuals, most tertiary administrative divisions.  Examples:  Yulha-dong, Jjigae.  
5th class.  Extremely high granularity, covering a very small topic area.  Likely to be difficult to expand, and may be a candidate for merging into a broader article.  Examples:  Jipyeong-ri, Budae jjigae.
-- Visviva 13:57, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Have implemented the above. -- Visviva 10:39, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Revision

message: Why not use the standard assessment color codes? -- Prove It (talk) 14:25, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, those colours were chosen solely by me, when I updated  with the previous scales. After adapting the standard, I decided to leave those colours, because they are similar to the standard (except for FA). Do you think it is necessary to use the standard? eDenE 01:27, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's preferable but certainly not necessary.  It makes no difference at all for those who work only on the Korea project, but if they contribute to multiple projects its a distraction ... particularly now that some pages are showing the official statistics. -- Prove It (talk) 15:52, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment color codes
Talk:National Register of Historic Places listings in Litchfield County, Connecticut

message: I fail to see the sourcing or the usefulness of the asterisking of several places in this article, added in this diff by Polaron.  It seems to be about postal mailing addresses for places.  I currently believe the Winchester town identifier, with no qualifying asterisk, is accurate.  I will pause for discussion but expect to remove this. --doncram (talk) 16:49, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  neighborhood stuff
Talk:Bernhard Stavenhagen

message: Apparently there is a book (I think?) about his wife:  by Gerhard Kohlweyer, published in 2007 by Weimarer taschenbuchverlag, Weimar. (Available in preview on Google Books, id RTFj7Ve-IzAC .) Schissel | Sound the Note! 20:40, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Agnes Stavenhagen
Talk:National Register of Historic Places listings in New Haven County, Connecticut

message: Hello all... 
An image used in the article, specifically :Image:Gianttower.jpg, has a little bit of a licensing issue.  The image was uploaded back when the rules around image uploading were less restrictive.  It is presumed that the uploader was willing to license the picture under the GFDL license but was not clear in that regard.  As such, the image, while not at risk of deletion, is likely not clearly licensed to allow for free use in any future use of this article.  If anyone has an image that can replace this, or can go take one and upload it, it would be best.
You have your mission, take your camera and start clicking.--Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:58, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image needs replacement 
Talk:Bernhard Witkop

message: Berhard Witkop died November 22th 2010, see http://www.leopoldina.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Presse_Newsletter/Newsletter_2011_01_Englisch.pdf page 10, left column. -- Aspiriniks (talk) 15:45, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  death 
Talk:Bernt Notke

message: mentions a possibility that Notke was not born in Pomerania. I don't have access to the sources cited there, but is it a viable hypothesis or just an opinion of the author of the website? --Sander Säde 11:16, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthplace? 
Talk:Architectural sculpture in the United States

message: *Robert Graham
from the list od architectural sculptors.  Althought his gates at the Olympic Stadium might be considered architectural, I can think of little else and don't feel (yes, this is about feelings) that he is in the same league as the others listed.  Please feel free to convince me otherwise.  Carptrash (talk) 21:39, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  I just cut this out 

message: I just removed "These can be either functional or purely decorative, although in most cases due to their placement on facades of older buildings these ornaments were structural in nature." from the article because it's incorrect.  In masonry buildings maybe 10% of the architectural sculpture was structural in any way.  You have the odd set of caryatids or atlantes that might support a porch or something like that.  The vast majority of sculpture was either cornice figures or finials, riding on top, or bas-reliefs or spandrels panels, admittedly part of the cladding but not structural at all.  --Lockley (talk) 18:11, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  removed a sentence
Talk:National Register of Historic Places listings in Tolland County, Connecticut

message: Working on creating/improving articles for all the entries here.  Draft articles, written by a program drawing on NRIS database, are available at Talk:National Register of Historic Places listings in Tolland County, Connecticut/drafts.  Please help!
BTW, to check last 500 edits of these articles (and of other links from the list-article), see 
Recent changes --doncram (talk) 18:52, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  article drive 
Talk:Daniel Myron LeFever

message: The following info was placed in the references/links area for some reason.  Did not know where this would fit in the actual article. 
Concerning the "Lefever Nitro Special" side by side 12 ga. shotgun I own, I just want to verify that on the barrel of my gun it says "Lefever Arms, Branch Ithaca gun company, Ithaca New York." These are the low end guns designed and made by Ithica using the lefever name for name recognition in marketing the product.  
--Scarlett Lily (talk) 20:33, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misplaced Information
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Russia/New article announcements/2005

message: I do not see how my signature in an announcement of somebody else's article serve any usefull purpose. Thus, I indend to sign only announcements of my own articles and/or my opinions about articles abakharev 04:33, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Signatures in announcement 

message: I usually have been trying to announce all Main Page references to the Portal articles in the URGENT ANNOUNCEMENT section. This include WP:DYK, current events, FA. The announce sits here during the appearance of the article on the main page (for WP:DYK it is usually 12..15 hours). When the article is removed from the main-page, I have been removing the announcement (obviously there is a lag sometime). There are two reasons to announce references of the articles:
#Appearance of the article on the main-page is a kind of recognition of the collective work of our Portal's editors. People who edited the article might want to see it on the main page while it is here. Thus, announcements are suppose to lift our morale.
#Articles referred on the main-page page are highly visible and often attract a lot of editors. Among them maybe vandals and good-intentioned people without proper knowledge of Russia, who made silly mistakes. Thus, it is   worth to monitor the article while it is referred on the main-page.
On the other hand, obviously these announcement may distract the users from more important announcements and they make already long article even longer. I believe these are the reasons User:Mikkalai asks to stop these announcements. Obviously decisions either way, would not be a catastrophe. Please comment. abakharev 08:53, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mainpage appearence of the articles announced here?
Talk:E. Frederic Morrow

message: I agree with Wikipedia policies on sourcing and citing.  But my tiny addition to this page creates a dilemma, one I'm sure has come up before.  I went to Bowdoin College.  When I found conflicts between perfectly reputable newspapers and magazines on where E.F.M. went to college, I inquired, and found that he went to Bowdoin, but had to return home to assist his family before he could graduate.  He's dead, but my inquiry could be an invasion of privacy.  Even if I were willing to post my source's name (which I'm not), what is the source-ing value of a private email?  Even if I called his survivors and asked them (and they happened to know the answer), why should anyone believe a posting that "I talked to them?"  Tim Stagehand 14:09, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Greetings,
I have encountered upon several resources stating his birthday is in 1906 and 1909, with the months of September and April as possible. Is anyone able to verify when his actual birthdate and death date are so we can confirm this? Thank you.
Kevin9217 (talk) 18:09, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth and death date dispute?
Talk:National Register of Historic Places listings in Missouri, Counties C

message: I noticed the Dick-Kobel Homestead in the Cooper county list is shown as being in Jamestown.  The Jamestown page lists it as in Moniteau County.  Is it the town that's incorrect here or should this whole line be moved to the Moniteau list?  HornColumbia (talk) 17:33, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I looked at  and it looks like it is correct on this page as shown in Cooper county.  Jamestown is just the nearest town, and it is the next county over.  HornColumbia (talk) 15:33, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Whew! :) --doncram (talk) 16:38, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dick-Kobel Homestead in Jamestown
Talk:National Register of Historic Places listings in Missouri, Counties D–I

message: Wilshire Apartments in Springfield was on old list, but not Elkman generated table.  Investingation shows it's coded "DR" which means "DATE RECEIVED/PENDING NOMINATION".  I'm not sure whether to add a delisted box for that, or just disregard it.  I am choosing disregard, for now. Lvklock (talk) 22:07, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Greene County
Talk:National Register of Historic Places listings in Missouri, Counties J–K

message: The following Boundary Increases need to have articles/infoboxes started incorporating all the info from each into one article:
*Independence
** Harry S. Truman National Historic Site
** Harry S. Truman National Historic Site (Boundary Increase)
*Kansas City
** District III
** District III (Boundary Increase)
** Old Town Historic District
** Old Town Historic District (Boundary Increase)
** Old Town Historic District (Boundary Increase II)
** Old Town Historic District (Boundary Increase III)
** Row House Building
** Row House Buildings (Boundary Increase)
** Walnut Street Warehouse and Commercial Historic District
** Walnut Street Warehouse and Commercial Historic District (Boundary Increase)
** West Ninth Street-Baltimore Avenue Historic District
** West Ninth Street-Baltimore Avenue Historic District (Boundary Increase I)
** West Ninth Street-Baltimore Avenue Historic District (Boundary Increase II)
:That was a note of mine from a long time ago, methinks.  Only first set has been done so far, others are currently appearing as red-links. --doncram (talk) 18:31, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: FYI, I just made a new listing for National Register of Historic Places listings in Jackson County, Missouri. So if you have anything to add to Kansans City, add it there. ----DanTD (talk) 20:11, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: development
Talk:List of places with "Silicon" names

message: It might be good if the page defined some sort of solid requirement for inclusion. I would propose something simple like "has been described using the nickname in a source that is not self-promotional". Silicon Beach (Bournemouth) would fail this criteria, for example - it seems to be only referred to as Silicon Beach by people promoting tech sector investment in Bournemouth, with no external traction. -155.63.200.55 (talk) 21:37, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur Michaelmalak (talk) 03:12, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Qualification Requirements

message: The www.tbtf.com/siliconia.html page is no longer being updated. It hasn't been since 2001. The page owner doesn't reply to e-mails anymore. The copy at silicongulf.net has a more updated one.
The recent edition of Silicon Cape follows the launch of  http://www.siliconcape.com a non-profit initiative that was a trending topic on twitter on the 8th October 2009
~~  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.223.60.60 (talk) 07:54, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Out of date info

message: Tech Valley (New York) takes is name as a play off "Silicon Valley", would this be relevant to this article even if it is not a place that uses "Silicon"? It does take its name from that of Silicon Valley as most of the other places on this article do, such as the Silicon Forest and Silicon Alley in Oregon and New York City.Camelbinky (talk) 00:43, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tech Valley 

message: Hi, could someone please rollback the recent vandalism and restore this version? Thanks. -- Horst-schlaemma (talk) 09:33, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: There are a number of entries, such as "Cyberabad" and "Health Valley", that are not actually "Silicon" names. There are two ways to clean this up:
#Remove any names that don't include "Silicon" or some pun or rhyme thereof
#Revise the list inclusion criteria to somehow allow for these entries. This would have to be done carefully so as not to overlap with List of technology centers.
Any thoughts? Ibadibam (talk) 20:36, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: We could just rename the article, thou it might get a little bulkier then. Suggestions? -- Horst-schlaemma (talk) 21:25, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems like there should be a broader reorganization of this list and the technology centers list. I'll propose a merge. Ibadibam (talk) 21:36, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Good proposal, thank you Ibadibam. -- Horst-schlaemma (talk) 13:05, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Places that do not meet the list inclusion criteria
Talk:National Register of Historic Places listings in Missouri, Counties Ste.–Z

message: ;research issue / editing issue:
*What are two dates for Ste. Genevieve HD.  Should probably be one entry with 2 dates properly described.  Was there are boundary increase in 2002?  Article needs a little work, it describes 2002 as being the NRHP listing date which is probably incorrect. (Yes, i agree.  Maybe this constitutes an NRIS error to be reported, that it is listed twice?)
::My guess is that the original is an NHL district, then there's a boundary increase that's just an NRHP district. Not sure how to present it.  I'd probably add a second stripped infobox to the article for the boundary increase. Lvklock (talk) 03:36, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Ended up adding second date and ref number to existing infobox, and mentionaing boundary increase in text.  If someone has a better way, feel free. Lvklock (talk) 03:59, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Ste. Genevieve County
Talk:1993 German Grand Prix

message: I'm no writer so I'm not going to rewrite this, but the description is very inaccurate.
Brundle certainly does not spin off right after Senna does, and stays in 4th until he receives a stop-go on lap 12.
Berger, Senna and Patrese all swapped places within a few corners, not within 3 laps as stated.
Hill doesn't spin off when his tire bursts, is goes, he maintains control, and then goes off half a lap later as he is coming into the stadium.
Prost and Brundle received stop-go's for cutting a chicane on lap 1, Brundle took the penalty on lap 12 and Prost on 10. His stop-go was nothing to do with the overtake, according to commentary by Murray Walker (no onscreen FIA confirmation though). 82.13.35.10 (talk) 23:58, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccurate Description