lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Pepsi

message: Changing the logo to the updated one. Yagasashi (talk) 04:56, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: New logo is already added to the article, just not in the Infobox yet as the new logo only comes in effect from fall of 2023. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 16:43, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 29 March 2023 

message: The Pepsi logo has been changed
Source: 
https://edition.cnn.com/2023/03/28/business/pepsi-new-logo/index.html Graceisreal (talk) 08:51, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: New logo is already added to the article, just not in the Infobox yet as the new logo only comes in effect from fall of 2023. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 16:43, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 29 March 2023 (2) 

message: Currently, the 2023 logo is used in the infobox. However, the 2014 logo is still in use  and not due to be replaced by the 2023 logo until this fall (and even later outside of North America) . I think the article should use the logo that is actually being used, since that reflects the product better. The article makes it seem like the logo has already changed, especially with the "used from 2008 to 2023" caption below the 2014 logo, when that's not the case. Thoughts? (I would just go revert it myself, but my account isn't autoconfirmed yet) C. A. Struck (talk) 05:58, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Update: Amusingly, making this comment gave my account enough edits to be autoconfirmed. Seeing as there have been no replies, this doesn't seem to be a contentious issue, so I've gone ahead and made the changes I've described. C. A. Struck (talk) 04:25, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo in infobox 

message: Was wondering if this could be used as the Pepsi can featured in the infobox until the new one is uploaded, the logo is almost the same as the new logo just different letting of the Pepsi text. If not it's okay, just wanted to get a general consensus of everyone's thoughts before just putting it there.
Thanks
 Brotherbenz (talk) 01:24, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pepsi can logo 

message: Add blue Pepsi to variants.  https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pepsi_Blue  2607:FEA8:6000:69C:812C:DB74:1C82:F02B (talk) 09:09, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: The variants, including Pepsi Blue, are found at List of Pepsi variations. Capybara Fan (talk) 16:19, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 7 January 2024 

message: points. (June 2022)
Pepsi is a carbonated soft drink with a cola flavor, manufactured by PepsiCo. It was originally created and developed in 1893 by Caleb Bradham in the United States, and became known as Pepsi-Cola in 1898, before shortening to Pepsi in 1961. As of 2023, Pepsi is the second most valuable soft drink brand worldwide behind Coca-Cola; the two share a long-standing rivalry in what has been called the "cola wars".
 41.113.36.234 (talk) 16:37, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pepsi 

message: is a good drink ever 196.191.177.127 (talk) 09:36, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is a good soft drink ever
File talk:Baoshan1937-Asahi-01.jpg

message: Why is this page protected?Pedant 20:49, 2005 Jun 25 (UTC)
:Have you seen the history? ;) It was protected at the same time as The Rape of Nanking (book).  I think it wasn't unprotected at the same time because there's not much legitimate work to be done on image pages. Mark1 04:49, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Pedro Pablo Abarca de Bolea, 10th Count of Aranda

message: Charles III was King at the time, Jesuits etc. was down to Monino. Added dates and referenced the Motin de Esquilache riot for future link/redirect. Alf 20:50, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I just did a fairly extensive stylistic edit dealing with grammar & syntax.  The word "indulted" remains.  I would guess that it should read "indicted," but I'm not about to edit on the basis of a guess.  Could "insulted," too.  Perhaps the original writer will return & be so kind as to clarify.
Terry J. Carter (talk) 00:53, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indulted? 

message: OK--my edit didn't 'take' the first time because the slave servers were catching up; I just re-edited, though I still have a couple of questions.
Terry J. Carter (talk) 00:58, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indulted Redux 

message: Removed military History tag as subject of the article is not notable for his military exploits but rather his political and diplomatic deeds and is therefore out of scope. --dashiellx (talk) 19:53, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 
Talk:Next Magazine (Hong Kong and Taiwan)

message: Why does this article use scientific notation when denoting currency and circulation? Tlönorbis (talk) 06:55, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Scientific notation

message: Just for interest: which magazine has the highest readership in Hong Kong? :) -- Jerry Crimson Mann 21:47, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It is difficult to say... But I am sure that this magazine is not the highest readership in Hong Kong.--Eno TALK 00:25, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Their is currently an RfC opened for this media to determine what kind of source it is. The RFC can be located at Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#RfC:_Next_Magazine_(Hong_Kong_and_Taiwan)  
Galendalia CVU Member \ Chat Me Up 17:47, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: RFC Opened on this media
Talk:Categoricity

message: links. I hope that here "cardinal" means cardinal number. Also, does "infinite cardinality" simply means "not finite"? Oleg Alexandrov 22:23, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep. Thanks. - Gauge 21:49, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  thanks thanks. :) Oleg Alexandrov 22:23, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)

text: I'm moving this to 'categoricity', anyway: nouns trump adjectives here. Charles Matthews 16:44, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Dexterity

message: Is it really appropriate to mention a board game? -anon
:It would be more appropriate to have a disambiguated page Dexterity (Dungeons & Dragons) but there would be so little content that it is hardly worth it. This page alone has virtually no content. Run! 17:03, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Appropriate? 

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot 05:01, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-02-1 Automated pywikipediabot message
Talk:N. R. Narayana Murthy

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: not moved. One could argue this should be closed as no consensus. Yet: though not a formal oppose, the only comment in more than a month provides evidence for an WP:ARTICLETITLE with "NR"; I see no rebuttal from the move proposer. If there is any information I am unaware of, please feel free to bring it to my talk, and I will reconsider the close. (non-admin closure) Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 15:10, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: N. R. Narayana Murthy →  – As per WP:COMMONNAME. No matter how you look at it, Narayana Murthy is the common name. It should be obvious and unanimous. Barely are there any sources cited in the article that don't refer to him as Narayana Murthy Appu (talk) 16:34, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject India has been notified of this discussion. — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 18:11, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Computing has been notified of this discussion. — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 18:11, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Business has been notified of this discussion. — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 18:11, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

text: I mean... is it? Seems like it's actually the current title that's more common.  ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 18:18, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 27 August 2021 

message: Is he Murty, as in the headline, or Murthy, as in the text? 86.4.118.201 (talk) 07:40, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: Vikash  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:4043:4E89:60B7:5D55:A9E7:8D67:D7D4 (talk) 14:26, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hindi
Talk:Fatted calf

message: Shouldn't this be fattened calf? —Salmar (talk) 23:35, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling 
Talk:Santa Cruz Futebol Clube

message: Why Santa Cruz Futebol Clube was redirected to Santa Cruz (football club)? There was absolutely no need for that. I think that will be better to redirect Santa Cruz (football club) to Santa Cruz Futebol Clube. Santa Cruz Futebol Clube is the official name of the club, so, is better to simply rename the article Santa Cruz Futebol Clube, because all of the other Brazilian clubs articles use the official name of the clubs. --Carioca 22:04, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: 2011 national women's champion Gerimex changed their name to Santa Cruz FC for the 2012 Bolivian women's football championship. Is the team connected somehow? -Koppapa (talk) 07:28, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: No. It is just named after the city of Santa Cruz de la Sierra. I found nothing in my Google search. --Carioca (talk) 19:10, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, thank you. -Koppapa (talk) 19:13, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Women's team?
Talk:Illusion of control

message: I'm editing this article as part of my History & Systems of Psychology course at Shenandoah University, in conjunction with the APS Wikipedia Initiative.
Sources I will be using are listed below:
Matute, H. A. (2011). Illusions of causality at the heart of pseudoscience. British Journal Of Psychology, 102(3), 392-405.
Presson, P. A. (1996). Illusion of control: A meta-analytic review. Journal Of Social Behavior & Personality, 11(3), 493-510. 
Wohl, M. E. (2009). Illusion of control by proxy: Placing one's fate in the hands of another. British Journal Of Social Psychology, 48(1), 183-200.
--JBelkin24 (talk) 00:49, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing for School Project 

message: Manipulate people or someone with illusions to deceive them for example a poor men tell a rich men he can  multiply his money but want his money. Mabuya2007 (talk) 17:42, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Illusions
Talk:The La's (album)

message: Rate Your Music do not have 'Professional reviews', just ordinary people with ordinary opinions.--MartinUK 22:04, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Rannamaari

message: Is "Rannamaari", the proper way of spelling this word? I have seen it spelt many different ways, eg: "Rannamari" and "Ranamari", the latter being seen most often in modern literature.
:I don't think there is any official spelling for it. When written as Rannamaari, it is the exact romanization of how its locally pronouced. But I think the spelling Rannamari would be more appropirate for it, and keep the current title as a redirect page? --Oblivious 23:30, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: Motion l 06:59, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rannamari vs Dragon of Silene
Talk:Architecture of Russia

message: — Assignment last updated by Soviethistorian (talk) 16:59, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Imperial Russian History
Talk:Battle of Borodino

message: In the article, the statement "On 18 August Kutuzov arrived at Sarevo to greet the army" is referenced to a Vietnamese book. The book is referenced many times in the article, so I assume it's an important work on the subject. However, I cannot find a location named "Sarevo" anywhere near Borodino. There is one well to the east of Moscow, but Kutozov could not have greeted the army there before the battle. So here is the question: was there a mistranslation somewhere here (Russian-->Viet-->English), or is this just wrong? IF wrong, can we find the correct location? If not, the location should be removed. -Arch dude (talk) 17:32, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point. A correct spelling of this village is Tsaryovo-Zaymishche (direct transliteration gives "Tsarevo", the first "T" was lost, which resulted in "Sarevo". In general, if this source contains such a mistake, it makes sense to replace it with something more reliable. I'll try to check it.--Paul Siebert (talk) 21:30, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

text: Do we know that the Vietnamese book is reliable? I don't read Vietnamese, but it strikes me as odd that an article on the Battle of Borodino would rely so heavily on Vietnamese-language sources. Kate Riley2019 (talk) 02:45, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sarevo? 

message: The header to this article prominently states 68,000 dead, a blatantly erroneous number, presumably written by someone who didn't understand the meaning of casualties in battle (killed, wounded, and missing). This error is even clearly contradicted by the both the Casualties section of the article and the sidebar numbers.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.140.75.108 (talk) 18:00, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  68,000 casualties not 68,000 dead 

message: I'd be inclined to err on the side of caution and just list the range of proposed troop numbers (and casualties), since so many respected and eminent scholars appear to disagree. From Chandler, Duffy, Soltyk, Adams, Zamoyski, Lieven, Lejeune, and of course Caulaincourt - none appear to give the exact same figures. 
I like the approach of Dwyer, who simply says:   - Dwyer, P. (2013). Citizen Emperor: Napoleon in Power 1799-1815. Yale University Press. (p. 383)
So I would propose using Dwyers very cautious estimates: 103,000-135,000 vs 125,000-155,000
Likewise with casualties:
 (p. 385)
 (p. 385-6)
Although, Zamoyski writes:  - Zamoyski, A. (2004). Moscow 1812: Napoleon’s Fatal March. HarperCollins Publishers. (p. 287-8). 
Given that the speculation resulting from Kutuzov's remarks is only hearsay, we can safely put that aside. Although if I'm being consistent, I must insist on adding the lower figure of 28,000 to the range that Dwyer lists.
So I would propose for casualty numbers: 28,000-35,000 vs 40,000-50,000.
- EnlightenmentNow1792 (talk) 10:41, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Troop strength and casualty figures
Talk:Mimi Fariña

message: Should there be a section on how HOT she was back in the day? She made her sister Joan look like curdled poo.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.176.249.232 (talk) 19:21, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No. It isn't encyclopedic, and would sound like POV. I had the same question once when covering Cat Stevens. --leahtwosaints (talk) 01:07, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hotness
Talk:Adriano Panatta

message: The article needs to be made more neutral in tone or have claims cited by multiple secondary sources. Issues include:
#"...He is widely considered to be one of Italy's greatest ever tennis players..."
#"...some fans consider him to be among the best clay court players in tennis history..."
#"...He became a successful European junior player..."
#"...Despite his power and perfect technique..."
Please remember this is an encyclopedia, not a sports almanac or tabloid newspaper.  The Rambling Man on tour (talk) 07:20, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 

message: I was a ranked junior Player in Italy and a tennis fan in general. The article about Panatta is not biased but in my opinion expresses widespread opinions about Adriano Panatta by those tennis fans that had the chance to follow his career at the time he was an active player. 
While Panatta's career did not last as long as that of other world renown tennis greats, he was indeed one of the best players of his time on clay. Panatta defeated Borg several times and even defeated a very young and talented Connors. 
Let me consider the contested statements above one by one:
#"...He is widely considered to be one of Italy's greatest ever tennis players..."
-- In Italy this is certainly true. There isn't one Italian I ever spoke to that does not consider Panatta the greatest Italian player ever. The runner up would be Nicola Pietrangeli but most italian fans would agree that Pietrangeli is a distant second.
#"...some fans consider him to be among the best clay court players in tennis history..."
-- This is certainly true as well. "Among the best" is the key word here. He is not the best ever, but certainly he should make anyone's top 10 as judged by the caliber of players he defeated or had close matches with during his clay career.
#"...He became a successful European junior player..."
-- That he was. Where success is defined as winning junior tournaments, he was one fo the best in Europe at that time.
#"...Despite his power and perfect technique..."
Panatta's worst characteristic was his moodiness and consistency, but even a Panatta on a bad day had exquisite, classical tennis style and he was certainly a powerful player.
In fact, Panatta was one of the last pure "Serve and Volley" players to defeat the baseline machines of the time on Clay (Borg, Vilas, etc.).
By the late 70's it was clear that 2 handed backends and a baseline, top spin game would be the wave of the future, yet Panatta still played his serve and volley game in an impeccable manner. Panata could have starred in a 1950's film on "How to play tennis" as his style was very much based on the styles of the previous generation (Stan Smith, Rod Laver).
67.172.190.169 (talk) 03:30, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Rebuttal to the comment above
Talk:The Boys in the Band (1970 film)

message: Friedkin's film Cruising was described in this article as "widely panned as being a horrible and homophobic film".  It's well-established that it was widely criticized as homophobic.  It's not well-established that it was widely called "horrible".  Before we include such a value judgement we should be surer that it was that value judgement that was made and that someone who thinks the movie was horrible isn't exaggerating others' reactions to it. -- Antaeus Feldspar 23:59, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Adverse criticisms

message: I removed the sentence "Among the major critics, the notably homophobic Pauline Kael, who despised Friedkin and panned everything he made, was alone in finding absolutely nothing redeeming about it" because it makes three fairly strong, broad assertions without providing any evidence. Kael's article does not seem to mention homophobia, so where is this coming from? Bhumiya (said/done) 03:05, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Pauline Kael

message: Thanks for uploading or contributing to :Image:LeonardFrey.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Papa November (talk) 23:40, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for [[:Image:LeonardFrey.jpg]]

message: --12.213.80.54 (talk) 16:02, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  Honestly, at least the $2,695 should be removed. That's just a ridiculous thing to even have up there. 74.96.75.228 (talk) 23:41, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Can this possibly add up?/Box office
Talk:Heritage Christian University

message: Could someone cite some sources about the legal issues Heritage has had in the past?  A quick Google search didn't come up with much.  --Ichabod 00:13, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Legal issue sources
Talk:Fiber crop

message: ::I would like to see the length and bredth of hemp fiber added to the table. I recall the fiber length being on the order of meters, not millimeters.
:::David Haight 04/06/2014  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.98.244.78 (talk) 16:59, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: @ 2405:201:2E:1030:90C5:CAF2:F4E4:9773 (talk) 12:45, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thanks Wikipedia 😁
Talk:CDP

message: ----
CDP also stands for Command Decisions Paintball.  A paintball field located in Taylorsville North Carolina containing 40 acres of playable wooded areas and two speedball fields.  www.cdpaintball.com
Richmond Pharmacology, in association with UCB,is conducting a medical trial for Multiple Sclerosis patients with Relapsing/Remitting.
This study aims to find out more information on what the optimum dosage is to give to MS patients.
For further information please look at www.trials4patients.co.uk  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.36.106.121 (talk) 14:57, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Administrator intervention against vandalism

message: User Mys_721tx cancel and revert the blocked page without any reason in 3 times and more. 183.179.129.14 (talk) 04:18, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I cannot warned him by myself 183.179.129.14 (talk) 04:20, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

text: Please see the banner at the top of this page. Also your report makes no sense. Geardona (talk to me?) 18:42, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Report user Mys_721tx
Talk:Odd Nordstoga

message: WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive
With some references, and maybe an infobox, it could be a B.
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 18:39, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: The cleanup tag was added with this revision. It's likely that the concerns that were behind the tag have been taken care of since. I'll remove the cleanup tag, though if anyone feels it requires further cleanup, feel free to state your concerns here and add the tag again. Delta Tango • Talk 22:30, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 
Talk:David Krumholtz

message: For some reason I always thought that it was Adam Goldberg that played Lucy Knight's killer in "E.R." -- I didn't know it was the "Numbers" guy :o Can someone (who is better at Wiki-editing than me) please add that to the table of roles, the year was 2000-- see Lucy_Knight#Death 199.214.26.8 18:26, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: wow, it was *him* that played Lucy Knight's killer in "E.R."

message: Removed "Jewish" from Wiki Article, per recent tweets by David Krumholtz via @DaveKrumholtz on Twitter.  On July 19, 2011 David states "RT @jurrasicave "@DaveKrumholtz so, uhh, are you Jewish?" Nope. Azerbaijani on my mom's side, Italian/Filipino on my dad's.", and on July 29, 2011 David states "FOR THE LAST TIME, I AM NOT JEWISH!!! I am Latvian-Persian on my mom's side, and Guatemalan-Welsh on my dad's side. Luv Jews though."  This statement was in response to a number of fans discussing his ethnicity. Colin Hanks via @Colin_Hanks on Twitter comments @DaveKrumholtz i didn't know you were Jewish" to which David replies "@Colin_Hanks I know, I totally don't look or sound or smell or taste or move jewishly." The twitter comments contradict the citation "The Right Type" by Naomi Pfefferman originally sourced in the Wikipedia articles "David Krumholtz and List of Jewish actors".. in which David is quoted as stating "I'm a nice Jewish boy.... These kinds of things shouldn't be happening to me."  --KDSRRGurl (talk) 03:44, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Update: Added "Jewish" back to article... Hours later David posts: I'm Jewish. --KDSRRGurl (talk) 06:12, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Ethnicity