lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Incorporated town

message: please provide a basis for the request or remove it.  Tomertalk 23:08, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: merge request

message: I think having the separate article is better. Merge? NO! Vaoverland 01:14, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I also vote no for the merge.  Not all towns are incorporated towns.  An incorporated town is a specific type of town.  For example, in Illinois, there are a few municipalities (like villages and cities) called incorporated towns; however, within the same state there are also unincorporated townships, which are sometimes simply called towns.  In my opinion, Town should actually become a disambiguation page.  Squideshi 03:53, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

text: There is a great deal of diversity between municipalities across the United States.  Each state has created their own version of what cities and towns (and villages and townships) do.  I would not merge them.  I also think that we should get a group of people interested in local government matters to get together and make a project of it.  Brian Sayrs 20:31, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 2 cents

message: There is currently a disagreement between the two references cited regarding which municipalities are indeed incorporated towns. I found at least two errors in the first reference (Name Index to Local Governments). It lists the municipalities of Annawan and Bentley as incorporated towns when the second reference (Incorporated Cities, Towns, and Villages of Illinois) and these municipalities' own official websites list them as villages. Both references are from sources ultimately published by the Illinois Secretary of State. I made corrections according to the second reference, as it was accessed at a later date and it appears to be consistent with the municipalities own official websites. I am going to contact the Illinois Secretary of State regarding the inconsistency. Squideshi (talk) 21:59, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Existing Illinois incorporated towns
Talk:Johnny Tremain

message: I haven't read the book, but there is a battle of Concord linked to Lexington, and I can find no google reference to a battle of concave. So I'm assuming it's a typo and fixing.Aaronchall (talk) 05:09, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Battles of Lexington and Concord/Concave?

message: Under what circumstances can this "Cleanup" tag be removed?  The article has been almost completely rewritten since it was posted.  Bigturtle 23:16, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: I dunno what's going on with this article, but I reverted it back to its most normal form (if anyone wants to change it back, check out proper wikipedia formating at wikipedia:help first.)  It was somewhat decent, with several sections and all, but then suddenly there was one giant, unorganized section, about eight summaries going at once.  then the infobox disappeared and suddenly it was a book report.  Whacky! ---Caesar
: Fixed (I hope). --Micahbrwn 15:21, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What the crud? 

message: Should it be added that the book we're reading in school has 269 pages instead of 288? There's different editions.
Is there really any need to list the number of pages at all? Karuseikaarie (talk) 02:00, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I have the book with me now,  269. 76.26.73.193 (talk) 11:39, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, the info box on the article states the number of pages (288), so I guess that one could and should change the number of pages.  But, first, which edition do you have?  It's possible that different editions might have different sized fonts.  Montgomery' 39 (talk) 21:07, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: By the way, the edition I'm reading in school has 322 pages.  So maybe someone should remove the info about the page numbers.  Montgomery' 39 (talk) 16:12, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pages 

message: What's with the "very very very fat?" I don't recall Johnny being fat.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryanmalik01 (talk • contribs) 00:20, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Obesity 

message: Johnny Tremain was the same age as Cilla and he had to marry her when he was older and so he liked her even if he wasn't going to marry her. When he left the house Cilla would but some food in his cup. He ran away because he brought some good presents and when Isannah got her present and hugged Johnny for the present she yelled ' LET ME GO JOHNNY I HATE YOUR HAND!!!"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.151.56.193 (talk) 02:39, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Information 

message: The following line was stricken from the article.
"By the way, Johnny likes apples and always ate the seeds, hence the myth of "Johnny Appleseed" was born."
I could not find a previous version when this change was added, but the legend of Johnny Appleseed existed long before this book was written.  The two stories appear to have nothing in common. 
DerekVF (talk) 08:05, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Johnny Appleseed
Talk:Jaish E Mohammed Islamic Fundamentalist Group

message: 2 points: 1) Most of this article doesn't make any sense and is totally inaccurate - "jaish-e-mohammed" doesn't mean in anyway at all "army of islam". the claims about being linked to jamiat-e-ulema are completely unverified and unjustified - unreliable sources like those silly american security websites just talk a load of cod's wallop based on some silly analysts' imaginations. 2) This article already exists in a better and more accurate and more detailed form Jaish-e-Mohammed. This article ought to be deleted, but i don't know how to put up one of those signs... Tanzeel 23:19, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have merged this article with Jaish-e-Mohammed.  As for your claims that the article is unsourced and unverified, there exists two links in the article that seem to agree.  By all means, please present some other sources on the talk page of the article if you wish to argue some of the points regarding the article.  -- malo (tlk) (cntrbtns) 18:23, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Adventures in Foam

message: Should it be noted that there appears to be a tracking mistake with the first CD of the Ninjatune re-release?  What I'm refering to is the fact that the track The Method appears to contain part of the end of Break Charmer and the actual song The Method appears to start 58secs into the track.  Can anyone verify this as a tracking mistake?  I've listened to it many times and it certinaly doesn't sound intentional, with Break Charmer being abruptly cut off and continued into the next track.  It is possible that this also occured on the original Ninebar release and CD1 of the re-issue is an exact duplicate. -MattWatt 23:05, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tracking Mistake 

message: I just now realized that the sample in Fat Ass Joint, where the guy say "I'd just like to kick back and smoke a fat ass joint", is taken from the track High Powered from Dr. Dre's album The Chronic.  It's right in the beginning.  I haven't listened to The Chronic in years and just noticed that.  Just passing on info I guess.  I don't know how this could be included in the article.  --68.227.106.55 (talk) 20:33, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fat Ass Joint Sample
Talk:Bricolage (album)

message: To what does "overseas" refer in this article? Britain? The US?
* Possibly the UK? Not sure what the editor meant.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.211.80.190 (talk) 23:54, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overseas? 
Talk:Permutation (Amon Tobin album)

message: Worth mentioning the upcoming 25-year anniversary rerelease Full Decent (talk) 18:17, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  25y
Talk:Supermodified (album)

message: Should this song be removed from the tracklist? Or at least a note included? It seems to have been wiped from the internet, probably because of a sampling-related copyright issue. It's not even listed on his Bandcamp.☣Yutsi — Talk/Edits 15:54, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Four Ton Mantis
Talk:Kill Bill Vol. 2 Original Soundtrack

message: I noticed that the tracks listedon the amazon.com product details are different than that of what is listed here. Can anyone offer insight in regard to that? 63.18.143.208 23:28, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Differences in track listing?

message: I linked the cover image "Image:Soundtrack -Kill Bill Volume 2-.jpg" to this article and I added fair use rationale and copyright information to image page.
Kresock (talk) 00:52, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Album cover image 
Talk:Life Model Decoy

message: What was the first reference to LMDs in Marvel Comics anyways? Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 10:03, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: First ref

message: I added an external link to a good bit of info on the LMD's.  It ought to help us flesh out this article if we can get any other sources to back it up.Lorddragyn (talk) 19:27, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: External links

message: Whenever they reveal what Coulson is on the TV show.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.227.77.90 (talk) 23:47, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Will need updated soon
Talk:Quintus Hortensius

message: Good article, but I have one bone of contention.  I feel the suggestion that Hortensius' daughter being noted as an orator is a little misleading.  Although it is true that she did speak up for the women of Rome when they faced an almost unprecedented taxation, I don't think she can be classed as an orator, which implies a profession, such as Cicero or Marcus Antonius Orator would be considered.  It would be like saying I'm a Driver just because I drive to work ever day.  Whereas a Driver might be considered to be more like someone such as Ayrton Senna or Michael Schumacher.  Just because I do doesn't mean I am, wouldn't you say?Aeneas10 (talk) 00:44, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hortensia the Orator 

message: According to Chris Scarre's Chronicle of the Roman Emperors (1995), Hortensius was executed during the proscriptions of 42-41 BC, and Emperor Augustus moved into his house, the so-called 'House of Livia' (p. 19).  (Repkow (talk) 14:38, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Execution of Hortensius 

message: There was no Social War but Allied War. Ignorants just copy this error and spread it. Oded  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.68.80.188 (talk) 18:05, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  [Social War] Allied War
Talk:Natasha Shneider

message: Does anyone have a source that shows that that she and Johannes are actually married?  This came up a few years ago on the Eleven mailing list, and I seem to recall that they were not legally married, and that, even though they have lived together for years, California does not have common law marriage.  Does anyone care to verify this? DLCinMaine 23:36, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Married?

message: She was a musician. Thus, she needs a musician's infobox. --Leahtwosaints (talk) 16:10, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infoox
Talk:Gilbert Burnet

message: There is a Dutch language wiki page on his second wife's grandfather, but for some reason it won't link. Possibly it would benefit from being translated into English?
:What do you mean Chris? There is no page for him anywhere???Le Sanglier des Ardennes (talk) 21:53, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: But could you direct me to Yr Dutch page? I can't find one at all, and 'twould be a help Le Sanglier des Ardennes (talk) 22:30, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

text: I tried that, and got a German page on someone else. I begin to believe there is none? Le Sanglier des Ardennes (talk) 22:42, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I had a look at the German page…I think the germans are confusing the twain. Le Sanglier des Ardennes (talk) 22:47, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Appolonius Schotte

message: See Aenmerkinge op de articulen... page 5
According to this publication he was in 1668 accused of being a rebel.Maggy (talk) 11:40, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Fugitive, rebel in 1668
Talk:Thomas-Jacques Taschereau

message: Here is a bit of background on the reason for the article.
The subject of the piece, Thomas-Jacques Taschereau, is the patriarch of a famous French Canadian family which is why I posted this stub. I did a number of the family as part of a project known as the DoCB Initiative. As with all articles I have started, I really hope someone comes along and improves it. Cheers! (Stormbay 23:45, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As discussed, it would really help if the beginning of the article, rather than just the talk page, set out the notability more clearly. Mentioning the DOCB thing would be good too. Good work Deizio 00:09, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  See  [[Wikipedia:Canadian wikipedians' notice board/Dictionary of Canadian Biography|DoCB Initiative]].
Talk:Amnesty

message: It is unclear here whether "public school" refers to a fee-paying school or a state-owned school. Perhaps "independent school" or "state-owned" school would be better. 143.167.238.103 04:27, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Public schools amnesty 

message: What is the stub tag on this article for?  What else is needed here? Mdotley 20:27, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stub? 

message: Amnesty 2001:4455:2E3:B900:7082:146C:B42:E19C (talk) 00:48, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amnesty 

message: Define amnesty 2A03:2880:20FF:14:0:0:FACE:B00C (talk) 21:16, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:Shaolin and Wu Tang

message: The description of the plot in the article does not resemble the film I've seen -- the film ends after the two students team up and defeat the Prince. There is no pool of acid, or anything subsequent (nor does everyone but these people die.) Up to this point, however, the films are similar. Are there different cuts of this film? (Also, discussion on IMDB suggests that other people have seen the version I saw. No one recalled a pool of acid.65.102.11.145 (talk) 21:16, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Bad plot summary?

message: This doesn't seem like a notable subject -- I don't see any references, and it seems likely that the plot summary was written by someone watching the movie and then writing a summary (rather than reference to reliable sources).  Are there any third-party references to this film that would make it notable?  Subverdor (talk) 04:49, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability?
Talk:Robeks

message: This one is an actual chain in the LA area.  I know it.  Bobak 23:57, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I just tried cleaning it and giving it a stub.  I didn't write this, but I do recognize the chain. Bobak 00:00, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed the speedy tag, as this article does not meet WP:CSD. The criteria for inclusion of companies and corporations are at WP:CORP; if this one does not meet these criteria, it can be deleted via WP:AFD. - Liberatore(T) 19:04, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have no bias one way or the other regarding to an AfD, I just thought it wasn't WP:CSD. - Bobak 19:19, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: STOP!

message: removed about 70% of the content of this article. it was mostly advertising stingers and diss-ings of competitors with every sentence ending in three exclamation markes. better to have less content than advertising content, right?
frymaster 16:30, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: advertising

message: deleted a section of advertising in this article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dookas27018 (talk • contribs) 04:20, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jan 2008 
Talk:Boxen (C. S. Lewis)

message: This is def a copyvio.  Looking back I reverted by accient, Fixed now. --Phenz 05:12, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio 

message: I hold the copyright to the material in question. I'll give permission for the material to be posted here as long as links are provided to each page the material is taken from. Previously a link was provided to only one of the two source pages. I reserve the right to approve (or disapprove) any editing of the material. Roverton 22:39, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  RE: Copyvio 

message: *For (As requestor) 68.39.174.238 23:20, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: Given that boxen is also computer jargon for something like "a collection of interchangeable computing hardware" (see this entry in the Jargon file: http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/B/boxen.html ) - do we need to disambiguate this entry? SlySven (talk) 23:52, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation
Talk:St. Lawrence Seaway

message: The International Level Bridge that appears in the diagram, and link below is incorrect.  This bridge is in Alberta, which is a long ways from the St Laurence River.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.31.100.81 (talk) 08:56, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update required. 

message: Most of the data below the St. Lawrence Seaway photo at the top of the page is for the St. Lawrence RIVER.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.247.70.162 (talk) 13:12, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update Required.
Talk:Charles Lennox Richardson

message: Saying that Richardson was "murdered" seems to imply judgment against the Satsuma bushi... I think "killed" is more neutral..  Tallasse 00:13, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is there really no better source (upon which so much content of this article appears to rely) than a German-language article that isn't available online from the looks of it? Even if it is the best source available, there ought to be others with at least something to say about Richardson and the situation. As it stands, the article gives nothing but Folker Reichert's view, with its accusations of arrogance etc, supported by appropriate statements from Richardson's uncle and the British Envoy to China, whereas I'm sure others at the time had their own views, not represented here; this therefore doesn't really seem balanced. Of course it's entirely plausible Richardson's arrogance was solely to blame; it would however be of value to have other sources and information included in this article, to my mind. I don't mean to suggest Folker Reichert's perspective and research are unqualified by any means (he has a German Wikipedia article even if not one here, which displays his academic positions at Yokohama University and Shanghai), merely that other authors might also have had something of worth to contribute here, maybe giving a more rounded view of things than what seems to boil down simply to 'Richardson was a boor; he deserved to be killed'.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.2.120.87 (talk) 21:59, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Folker Reichert

message: There are no eyewitness accounts from Clark nor Marshall that claimed he said, "he knows how to manage these people".  The article by Paul Martin in Japan Forward Sept 11, 2021, suggests that the incident occurred most likely due to lack of knowledge of the customs in Japan and didn't know the language and they fell into the situation by accident.  The article also states that "Richardson being arrogant and purposely antagonizing the procession...appear to be unfounded" and also letters from Richardson to his family make him out to be "incredibly dutiful son and brother.  He had been fined for an altercation he had with a Chinese servant while in China, but it appears to have been a solitary incident in which he took full responsibility insisting that the servant had been "insolent"." 
Clear the man's name, the anniversary is tomorrow 14Sept2023, 161 yrs ago. 63.97.36.15 (talk) 06:42, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestions of arrogance
Talk:Australian twenty-cent coin

message: I've never heard anyone call a 20-cent coin a "quinter". If it is an actual name for it, could somebody provide a source? 2001:8003:6C21:3800:5176:5ABB:23E4:F1C5 (talk) 05:42, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quinter
Talk:Hr 4437

message: It is so sad that a person that espouses the word of the wise can be so ignorant of the facts. Shame on you!! Shame on all individuals that are unwilling to research and communicate with us that have lived through LEGAL immigration and then you express an opinion that is hate against the legal immigrant. Shame on you for pushing your own agenda. SHAME ON YOU!!! Just goes to show the world that you are wrong, again!
 
I'm a legal immigrant. I have the permission of the American Government to be here. Someone you SLAP IN MY FACE by not supporting HR4437. I broke no LAW to enter this country. I have done those jobs you claim no American will do so that as to have a reason why we should let the ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS come here. Your ignorance should place you back into your mother’s womb so you could start life over. I'm positive you aren't even aware that you support the wrong cause. My family and I had to wait many years to get into the U. S. A. Now, after working three and four jobs at the same time, I have put myself through college and have four college degrees including a PhD. Unfortunately, the self-righteous will never understand.
 
Individuals, like yourself, completely misconstrue the facts and lie to the general public especially those that are poorly educated; specifically the illegals you support. You should be ashamed of your actions and I dare you to ever try to converse coherently to the LEGAL IMMIGRANTS of the AMERICA about this topic without looking as uneducated as you show yourself to be. You are not only foolish but I believe you can't explain your position without insulting the GREAT LEGAL IMMIGRANTS of America. 
 
WELL educated and willing to take the ILLEGALS AND SEND THEM BACK TO WAIT IN LINE AS WE LEGALS HAVE HAD TO DO!!
DumbFu**k you obviously dont know what you are talking about. I say that we let illegals stay they do no harm. They are the ones who picked the fruit that you eat. SO Fu*k you. As*hole
There is a non-copyright-infringing (I hope), less controversial (though far from perfect) article at H.R. 4437.  I believe that Hr 4437 should redirect to that article.
This is not a place to discuss HR 4437, but the neutrality of the article. I'm placing it in form of a rewrite, please do not edit about while I am going about this. blu_rav3 21:27, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:.380 ACP

message: The tables given for different loads' performance does not give barrel length, twist-rate and also how many rifle grooves were used. These certainly do make large differences in a cartridge's performance, particularly barrel length, so the table is completely useless to anybody who wants to get a good idea about .380 ACP's overall performance. Even if it didn't, it's redundant since there's already a ballistic performance table a scroll or two above it, which does tell its test barrel length, although it lacks information on bullet expansion and penetration. 2603:7080:413F:69C8:8B0C:FE01:8054:26AF (talk) 20:36, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Performance section is redundant and lacks critical information. 

message: "The .380 ACP cartridge was derived from Browning's earlier .38 ACP design, which was only marginally more powerful."  Qualify this statement.  There are no dimensional equivalents between .380 ACP and .38 ACP. Given that .38 ACP performs on par with 9mm Parabellum would represent more than a marginal increase in deliverable energy over the .380 ACP. 2600:8805:8000:3D:E5A2:3D48:54CC:1291 (talk) 00:26, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Design
Talk:Music of Florence

message: Hi, we are a group of musicologists (graduate students, faculty) engaged in a seminar on Music in Renaissance Florence, 1450-1520. We decided that instad of writing seminar papers we would contribute to the Wikipedia entry and make our work available to all. Please be patient with us, we are Wikipedia rookies and we will be doing a lot of clumsy editing over the next few days (Dec. 12- 20, 2008). Any help and/or feedback is welcome!
--Hoosiers602 (talk) 02:53, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]