lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Béla Király

message: The last sentence (part of which is quoted in the title) of the Section World War II & Post-war Imprisonment needs correction since Imre Nagy was not in the government until October 23, 1956. Mateat (talk) 02:41, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  In September 1956  the government of Imre Nagy paroled him 

message: This section writes that "On October 30, 1956, Király-led revolutionaries attacked the building of the Central Committee of the Communist Party." While the attack did happen, I do not believe that the attacker's were led by Király. The communist source János Berecz and the Russian source Oleg (misspelled as Olef in the references) Filimonov writing sixty years later are not reliable sources. Mateat (talk) 03:03, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Role in the 1956 Hungarian Revolution
Talk:Red fox sparrow

message: I'm starting to revise this page. I recently broke it into sections though the article is currently lacking critical information in several areas. Under Behavior I hope to add Diet and Reproduction if I have the time. If you would like to start these sections please feel free! I'd also like to see the description fleshed out with length, wingspan, and a slightly better description of plumage. The information on geographical distribution is good but I'd like to eventually see a section titled "Distribution and Habitat" to bring it in line with other articles. The vocalization section is another possible place for contributions. Kirkmona (talk) 16:48, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I took care of a better physical description. More to come. I'm also working on other sections. Here's a To Do list. Feel free to help.
* Conservation Status
* Diet
* Reproduction Though I'd like to see footnotes for first paragraph. More detail welcome as well.
* Habitat
* Vocalization-recording of call/song
Kirkmona (talk) 17:37, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

text: Updated to do list. Kirkmona (talk) 19:48, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Revision
Talk:5.6×52mmR

message: Does/did the .22 savage really have a 1:12 twist? This would be a little bit too long for the typical 71 grs bullet. 
All .22 Savage / 5.6x52R rifles I have ever seen had twist rates between 1:10 and 1:11 ...--82.83.56.94 (talk) 08:43, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  twiste rate 

message: Since the .22 Savage was the original and the 5.6x52R the copy, I think this article should be named after the Savage with the 5.6 redirecting to it, not the other way around.
*DONE... --RAF910 (talk) 22:24, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Name
Talk:Bingley Grammar School

message: Learn how to do a ref tag... and get rated higher Victuallers 11:16, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:The Birley Academy

message: tell us more about the school in Pwani Mchangani. Why no wiki page? More Victuallers 10:16, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bishop Barrow Trust

message: Not a school but good Victuallers 10:20, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:6.5×47mm Lapua

message: The article mentions a "donut problem" resulting from loading the same cases over and over, in the description of one of its images, which I find very long for an image description. It would be interesting if this  text could be moved and explained in better detail in the article body instead, so that the average person may understand what this "donut problem" is. 176.154.184.23 (talk) 08:03, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The "donut problem" is probably not much interest to anyone other than reloaders, and casual reloaders probably aren't even aware of it.  It will be difficult to find proper sources, as it is mostly discussed and debated among reloaders on specialty forums.   The donut problem results from two phenomena working together.  One, at the junction of the shoulder and neck, the neck is stiffer so it gives more resistance to expanding when the bullet is seated.  Some reloaders like to seat the base of the bullet slightly below the base of the neck and can feel the bullet snap into place.  This alone doesn't cause problems because it is only a slight increase in tension and can help maintain consistent "bullet pull."  Two, resizing causes some material to flow into the neck causing it to be thicker near the shoulder.  This is the dreaded "donut."  This is because firing expands the case, and sizing the case back down causes it to lengthen, pushing material into the neck.  This is why you have to trim the neck after sizing. These two together can cause significant resistance to seating the bullet past the base of the neck.   The increased tension can hold the bullet so tightly pressures can spike well above normal, causing damage to the firearm and rupturing the primer. DrHenley (talk) 17:10, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Donut problem? 

message: Yes, it may be fantastic that Mike can shoot tight groups and that there's more to come. This is an encyclopedia and you should use appropriate phrasing. Until then, it stays out. MikeTango (talk) 21:33, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Dear anonymous editor,
Talk:Ben Greenman

message: Bibliography section has been imported from now-merged Ben Greenman bibliography and is being tidied up using cite templates. Capitalization and punctuation follow standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, as much as Wikipedia templates allow it. ISBNs and other persistent identifiers, where available, are commented out, but still available for reference. This is a work in progress; feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 04:04, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography
Talk:7mm-08 Remington

message: How does this round compare to the 7x64mm round ballistically/weight wise/precision etc?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.194.186.128 (talk) 13:00, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  comparison with 7x64mm 

message: Does an english major want to take a hack at this sentence before I do??
"Medium burning rifle powders usually work best in the 7mm-08, The 4895's or varget."
Msjayhawk (talk) 04:54, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Really??

message: As newbie, I only just realised I could post this question here.
I've placed a couple of charts comparing relative performance of various 7mm-08 cartridges next to this section. If the author of the text posts the muzzle velocities, Ballistic Coefficients, Sectional Densities of the cartridges they refer to in the text, I'll do the calculations and amend the charts to include them instead. I could also include the other calibre's mentioned in the text, i.e.; 270 Win, 30-06, etc.   I think if we did this it would make for a better article. What do you think? JohnM ZoomNoodle77 (talk) 21:41, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cartridge Comparisons 
Talk:Ben Ikin

message: Why did he retire? is the age correct? Londo06 13:08, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it was all the injuries that cut his career short.--Jeff79 19:26, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ben Karlin

message: The reference cited to support the claim that "Karlin has been instigating lawsuits against creative peers/partners such as Benjamin Wallace" (http://www.observer.com/2008/oenophile-row-brooklyn-stoopmates-race-produce-wine-fraud-flick) does not mention any litigation.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.84.65.92 (talk) 02:51, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:7.62×45mm

message: I tried to clean up the dimensional issue as best I could. I took the Howell book as best source, definitely more authoritative than Cartridge Corner, which while it lists sources at the end doesn't say what data came from which source. And I tried to list the conflicting info better in a subsection of the article. I may add a table instead of the current format, which is still confusing. Arthurrh 02:18, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dimensional Discrepancy 

message: This, like the AK47 round 7.62x39, uses .310 or .311 caliber bullets.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rrw-racing (talk • contribs) 22:11, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional Deminsional Discrepancey 

message: I can't understand what relationship the 7.92×33mm Kurz round has with this article.  If there's no reason to include it in the "See Also" section I'll remove it next time I come through here (unless someone beats me to it.) 67.150.62.155 (talk) 00:45, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Done 4.156.81.150 (talk) 17:24, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  7.92×33mm Kurz 

message: Is there a source if this is an Intermediate cartridge? FSbiran (talk) 08:00, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intermediate?
Talk:Rebecca Oppenheimer

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Natsubee 17:08, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: — Assignment last updated by BaileeJackson (talk) 15:34, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Gender and Identity in STEM
Talk:Ben Shenton

message: This article is sourced mainly by election manifesto, BBC Radio Jersey website news and the Jersey Evening Post, the main newspaper for Jersey. No personal information about the individuals family - even if it appears on the manifesto, and is therefore in the public domain - is mentioned here in order to preserve privacy. The exception is the subjects father, who was a major Jersey politician, therefore referenced in the public domain.
--TonyinJersey 09:37, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ben Stevenson (dancer)

message: I deleted this:
"Stevenson is most noted for his choreography for the La Esmeralda Pas de Deux (1982), which is today a repertory staple with ballet companies all over the world."
I was pretty certain his was original, but to be sure I went back and checked and it bears no resemblance to the commonly (from every country I've ever seen it) done version.
Funambules (talk) 17:31, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: what's this about
:In nature there's no blemish but the mind;
:None can be call'd deform'd but the unkind:
:Virtue is beauty; but the beauteous-evil
:Are empty trunks, o'erflourished by the devil. ?? i removed it  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.33.240.179 (talk) 23:01, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wha..? 
Talk:7.92×107mm DS

message: I notice mention is made of "German-made Hagler bullets". The only thing I can find is a reference to a Hermann Gerlich (better known for his work on the Squeeze bore principle used for anti-tank guns), who apparently designed a "Hagler 280 HV Magnum" (does this refer to the ammo or the rifle itself?) in 1928 or so. The article on the Danish Schultz & Larsen arms company also mentions Gerlich.
Any additional information regarding Gerlich or what a "Hagler" bullet/rifle is would be appreciated. Russ3Z (talk) 17:10, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hagler bullets?
Talk:Ben Thompson (actor)

message: Has anyone got any proof that 22nd February 1992 is indeed his date of birth? if so can you add the link to the article, as i can't find any sources anywhere. Cheers Thenthornthing 14:20, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: D.O.B

message: Someone needs to find out his real date of birth with the article now giving two different dates of birth! (Strassenbahnhaltestelle88 (talk) 11:48, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Contradiction
Talk:Ben Turner (footballer)

message: I think the Ste White Ste White thing needs a source. Haddock420 (talk) 16:03, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Southern brown kiwi

message: Wikispecies seems to have Apteryx australis lowryi , not sure who is right. --Tony Wills (talk) 03:27, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Found a copy of the source cited by wikispecies, Bulletin of the British Ornithologists' Club, clearly has lawryi named after Sir W. Lawry Buller, so that's clear (to me :-) --Tony Wills (talk) 09:19, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apteryx australis lawryi 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
Hi, not sure what heading this follows under but just wanted to note I added a wikilink from Stewart Island under Conservation to the Geography of New Zealand article.Cnb8201 (talk) 11:07, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, Cnb8201; no need to leave a Talk page note when you add a wikilink, just note it in the edit summary. Actually, that Stewart Island link would be better pointing to the Stewart Island article, so I'll change it. Giantflightlessbirds (talk) 12:01, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added link
Talk:Ben van Oosten

message: Carpimaps (talk) 11:00, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:8 mm caliber

message: In Talk:8x57_IS#7.92mm_dispute, the designation of German 8mm calibres as "7.92" are tried to be resolved and sourced.
--Dingo (talk) 20:00, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "7.92mm" designation of unknown source 

message: .32 Colt needs added/linkedMzmadmike (talk) 09:20, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  .32 Colt should be here 

message: The redirect 7.92 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Okmrman (talk) 21:21, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:7.92]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:North Island brown kiwi

message: The population of this bird is shown to be about 35,000 on the bird species fact sheet, but only 25,000 on the Save the Kiwi website.--Jackoutofthebox 12:42, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The birdlife.org (I think thats what it was) had a 1996 citation I believe. Save the Kiwi was closer to 2007 #'s the last I checked. Teak the Kiwi 23:37, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflicting sources 

message: I added an external link to a YouTube video I myself shot and posted of a North Island Brown Kiwi feeding in the wild in daylight, a very rare video indeed!  There is no copyright issue.  I would think that people coming to this article would want to get to such a video easily.  It was removed by an automated Wikipedia YouTube link removal bot, but since there is not, per Wikipedia, a blanket ban on YouTube links, I undid the removal.  If I've violated policy (which I've read and tried to understand) then my apologies and some greater power than me, human or machine, may remove it again and I'll let that stand.  
Dchandler (talk) 08:54, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  External link to YouTube video 
Talk:8mm Remington Magnum

message: The name 8 mm Remington Magnum is incorrect. the correct naming convention for this cartridge is 8mm Remington Magnum. Please rename or move this page to the correct title. DeusImperator (talk) 17:58, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrectly named article 
Talk:Benedetto Aloi

message: Born in New York City, Aloi is the son of former Colombo caporegime, or captain, Sebastian "Buster" Aloi.''
There's no citation or article of Sebatian Buster Aloi. There's also no citation on the birthplace of Benedetto. His brother's article (who was born 2 years part) claimed he was born in Brooklyn. Meanwhile, this article claims he was vaguely born in New York City (which is not specific by any means). TomNyj0127 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 03:34, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  No source or credibility to following comment
Talk:8×56mmR

message: You don't Swage down, you draw down. You can't swage a bullet down, that's not what that word means. (This applies to bullet terminology/jargon, not machining in general.) You can draw the bullet through a sizing die, but it's going to induce core separation in soft point hunting bullets because the jacket has more spring to it than the lead core. 
74.41.114.178 (talk) 12:14, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Swage up, draw down
Talk:9×21mm Gyurza

message: This source claims the cartridges are not interchangeable
https://modernfirearms.net/en/handguns/handguns-en/russia-semi-automatic-pistols/sps-sr1-sr1m-eng/ FSbiran (talk) 22:50, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interchangeability
Talk:9.3×62mm

message: Someone added a neutrality tag without a topic on the talk page per convention.  Unless there is a reason why this article is tagged as such, it really needs to be removed.  Surv1v4l1st (Talk|Contribs) 16:18, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality tag? 

message: This is not a military round. How does it fall within the scope of the Military history WikiProject?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.18.65.190 (talk) 22:34, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Military history WikiProject 

message: 9.3 x 74r Why?  Digitallymade (talk) 03:39, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  9.3 x 74r Why? 
Talk:Automatic Colt Pistol

message: Where is the citation for the assertion that ACP stands for Automatic Cartridge Pistol and that Automatic Colt Pistol is incorrect? These were all Browning cartridges produced for Colt's and bear that company's name just as other cartridges of the day were name (e.g., .38 S&W, .38 Colt New Police, etc.).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ana Nim (talk • contribs) 16:26, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added a source - there are numerous that all say the same thing. AliveFreeHappy (talk) 16:35, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

text: Someone removed the ref, so I've added yet a different source. There are literally hundreds of books that state this obvious fact for those who remain unconvinced. AliveFreeHappy (talk) 16:28, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced
Talk:Benjamin D. Santer

message: Added the link to the Frederick Seitz wiki page.Masmit (talk) 15:17, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair enough. Far too much of this article, proportionanly, is given over to the "controversy" though. It was only SEPP trouble making and attention seeking William M. Connolley (talk) 20:31, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Is too much spent on the controversy, or too little spent on his research? I think that the article in its present form does a very sketchy job of informing the reader about Santers work. If this section were filled in, the article would read much more easily.71.243.119.32 (talk) 10:27, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  added link 

message: I'm not sure how McIntyre is NOT considered a reliable source as to his own email correspondence and FOIA requests. Perhaps I misunderstood the comment.71.243.119.32 (talk) 10:18, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Santer McIntyre Controversy 

message: In this article it is described how Santer and his team at the IPCC manipulated scientific review and publication processes in order to noticeable discredit a third party research. The science that Santer was doing does not look like it is based on arguments for discussing a thesis but rather by ordering publications and "friend-of-a-friend" dutys for impacting on others scientific well - needless to say there were put a few nasty fingers on some very doubtful statements in the text. Would you expect that from a scientist when someone else pops up and says "you computer model might be complex and whatever, but it does not meet with the measurement data thats available out there in the world.", would you extect this from Santer? In contrast you would expect him to do more research, check his data, models and so on, and the others methods and reasoning. Thats science. Was Santer still a normal behaving scientist at that time? I doubt this. --Alexander.stohr (talk) 20:49, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, but that article is not a reliable source for biographical information, and your comments are a serious breach of our WP:BLP policy. Please do not make accusations about living persons that is not supported by some very serious reliable sources.   --Kim D. Petersen (talk) 15:43, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Santer vs. Douglass 

message: Can you please make these edits for me?
Please replace Ben Santer's photo with this more current one. it is in the public domain
 http://pcmdi.github.io/about/staff/santer/stil_32425_GAK_Ben%20Santer_Q5I0377_006.jpeg
from this site
http://pcmdi.github.io/about/staff/santer/index.html
Photo was taken in 2014 by George Kitrinos/LLNL
Also, please list this article under "References and Notes"
Real Climate, "Close Encounters of the Absurd Kind," by Benjamin Santer
http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2010/02/close-encounters-of-the-absurd-kind/
128.115.190.46 (talk) 20:33, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  request edit
Talk:Ben Whitaker (politician)

message: Some personal facts are wrong.  How can I get the corrections printed?  (I am his widow) Pettigrue (talk) 20:22, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Publish the corrections elsewhere, for example on substack or twitter, then edit the article here and link to the published corrections. 185.194.184.52 (talk) 19:15, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  ben whitaker, politician
Talk:Benjamin Woods Labaree

message: This article looks like an ordinary resume seemingly about an ordinary professor. It has failed to even attempt establishing notability. Cheers!  <BR> --50.58.142.76 (talk) 07:22, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: See WP:AFD if you want to nominate the article for deletion. Capitals00 (talk) 07:36, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  But is he notable?
Talk:Benji Vaughan

message: This page had the WikiProject Albums banner at the top. I removed it: the article is about a person, not a recording.  — AnnaKucsma   (Talk to me!) 13:28, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ditto. Regards, SunCreator (talk) 13:07, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Album banner
Talk:Montana Grizzlies football

message: There's dissent between fans of the Griz and fans of the Bobcats as to which team should be mentioned first in the rivalry.  Because the page is Montana Grizzlies football, it makes logical sense to default to the Griz perspective on the naming controversy.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 161.7.59.24 (talk) 22:01, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Switched to Griz - Cat
Talk:Benny Mardones

message: I removed the claim that the song "Into the Night" is "about a 16 year old girl but not from a romantic point of view" because it was unsourced and would appear to be very difficult to support from the lyrics. ("If I could fly/I'd pick you up/I'd take you into the night/And show you a love/Like you've never seen...") If an actual source shows up, that can be added to the article. I also removed the claims that the song is the 27th or 28th most frequently played song on the radio and is played at least once a day on the radio in every major city in the U.S. because they were unsourced and seemed very difficult to confirm. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 07:29, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: First off, the section is poorly written, and as the cleanup note suggests, is not written in an encyclopedic tone.
This section of the article should go into discography. If someone disagrees, it should be rewritten and be placed below "Personal Life".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by XXBludnmunyXx (talk • contribs) 22:27, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: "Into the Night" section of the article
Talk:Berkant Göktan

message: HI all this is VASCO AMARAL FROM PORTUGAL
After doing some contributions to the article, i noticed that the infobox is (i know it's because of the picture, and picture are always good) bigger than it should and so the article is more compressed and tougher to read. SOMEONE SHOULD LESSEN THE SIZE OF IT, THANK YOU VERY MUCH IN ADVANCE!!!
REGARDS FROM PORTUGAL,
--217.129.67.28 14:02, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  GÖKTAN'S PICTURE
Talk:Bernard A. Newcomb

message: In looking for citations to support the article, it appears that article derives almost entirely fromt the American Foundation for the Blind website's donor bio page.
This needs to be fixed. 842U (talk) 15:51, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: plagiarized from the AFB.com donor bio?