Talk:Soldier of Fortune (video game)

message: Should this be split into two articles? Orange Goblin 11:00, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I reckon. —Pengo 05:42, 21 August 2005 (UTC)

text: I aggre it they need to be spilt. Bjweeks 04:43, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Soldier of Fortune and Soldier of Fortune II: Double Helix

message: You've got to me kidding me. It's Wolfenstein 2000.
(and as a result, it's probably the best mindless game I've ever played, same perhaps for Painkiller)
I don't understand why the PR dept insisted on marketing this thing as realistic and gritty (actually, I do - it was probably to try and stir up controversy), but even the developers clearly knew they were making a thrill-kill blastfest - there's even a level that has you fighting (neo-)Nazis in a German castle. They couldn't spell it out any more clearly.
Anyway, my point is that this ridiculous misrepresentation should not spill into the Wikipedia entry. I shall fix this later, I guess.--Gwilym 19:20, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Realistic And Accurate Shooter 

message: Gwilym, no offense, but I frankly don't care about your personal opinion, or the opinion of the guy who wrote the things about realism in the article. This is an encyclopedia, and for that very purpose, any opinionated statements should be excluded from any and all articles except in the event that they are annotated as quotes in the criticism section of a particular form of media. For instance, it is important to note the criticism a video game or book recieved from specific critics and general audiences, but the content in the encyclopedia should not denote a bias to any one of these criticisms. Therefore, I will change the criticism section to an unvbiased and objective list of seperate criticisms in quotations from specific critics, rather than what it is now: a biased and opinionated paragraph with no objectivitiy whatsoever. ManofRenown87 23:21, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism Section 

message: The locations section is a horrible mess. It's hard to read, disorganized, and just plain inaccurate. I made one change. The change I made was in the Sewers section. The original text said that the player is fighting against Serb insurgents and Russian "Peacekeepers". In fact, the player is fighting Serb insurgents ALONGSIDE Russian "Peacekeepers". The Russians role in the level is to help you, as their mission is the same as yours. In game, the target reticule lights up red when targeting Serb forces, but green when targeting Russian forces indicating them as friendly. At the end of the level, you meet with the Russian military leader in charge of the Russian campaign against the Serbians. He is also friendly in nature, and gives much helpful advice to John and Hawk.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.184.250.60 (talk) 03:42, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Locations Section 

message: In the paragraph about the violence there is a quote from some reviewer that states "one of my targets was on the floor, alive, yet gurgling softly through a hole in his throat". This certainly isn't featured in the game (at least in none of the versions I ever played). Enemies are either alive, in a short pain or death animation or completely dead and motionless. There is no such thing as people lying and suffering on the floor for several minutes making horrible noises. --188.106.103.101 (talk) 01:50, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The quote is a lie 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Soldier of Fortune (video game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131207042731/http://soldier-of-fortune.com/soffaq.php to http://www.soldier-of-fortune.com/soffaq.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:44, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Anyone who sees fit can remove the note at the top of the page. 2601:647:CB02:5034:A9D9:C859:43B3:99D4 (talk) 21:42, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  I believe the lede has been fixed