lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:NASCAR Xfinity Series at Charlotte (fall race)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: not moved. Per consensus (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 02:18, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: NASCAR Xfinity Series at Charlotte (fall race) →  – Place here your rationale for the proposed page name change, ideally referring to applicable naming convention policies and guidelines, and providing evidence in support where appropriate. If your reasoning includes search engine results, please prioritize searches limited to reliable sources (e.g. books, news, scholarly papers) over other web results. You don't need to add your signature at the end, as this template will do so automatically. Zrcook610 (talk) 00:58, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 18 December 2022
Talk:NASCAR Xfinity Series Championship Race

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: not moved. Nominator has been blocked as a sock and there is consensus against the move. (closed by non-admin page mover) echidnaLives - talk - edits 08:02, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: NASCAR Xfinity Series Championship Race →  – New merging Zrcook610 (talk) 12:43, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

text: Relisting comment: To form a clearer consensus echidnaLives - talk - edits 09:41, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 18 December 2022
Talk:NASCAR Xfinity Series at Homestead-Miami

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 02:18, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: NASCAR Xfinity Series at Homestead-Miami →  – Place here your rationale for the proposed page name change, ideally referring to applicable naming convention policies and guidelines, and providing evidence in support where appropriate. If your reasoning includes search engine results, please prioritize searches limited to reliable sources (e.g. books, news, scholarly papers) over other web results. You don't need to add your signature at the end, as this template will do so automatically. Zrcook610 (talk) 01:03, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 18 December 2022
File talk:Euskara.png

message: I was trying to find the meaning of the numbers in your :Image:Euskara.png but I see that you do not have this exact map on your web site.
Could you enhance the description?
--Error 22:58, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Meaning

message: Your site claims all copyrights for you, but the image page tell CC-BY.
Are you sure that is what you want?
--Error 22:58, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright
Talk:Michael Okpara

message: This article is a rearrangement/paraphrase of the article at OnlineNigeria, which was originally just copied and pasted. WQUlrich (talk) 20:39, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Single Source
Talk:Ray Heatherton

message: This is a formatting mess.  I've had a small go at it, and I've foud out that the guy is niotable.  But the article is unreadable.  It looks to me as though itwas written that way on purpose, though I suppose it is possible that it is a bad copy and paste from some website and may possibly be a copyvio.  At presnet itls too hard to make a judgement  Fiddle Faddle 22:58, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have commented out the following passages, which do not relate directly to Heatherton. If someone can make a good case for restoring them, please do so. 
*Also in the cast were future comedy veterans Imogene Coca and Sterling Holloway. The show ran for 158 performances, closing on October 8.
*whose instantly recognizable moniker (and the title of his 1930 film vehicle) was "King of Jazz"
*The star broadcaster, known for discovering and showcasing new talent,
*the almost-instant classic 
*—long before Frank Sinatra's hit recording revived it in the 1960s
*Also in the cast of Babes were the Nicholas Brothers, future headliners Dan Dailey and Alfred Drake as well as former child star Mitzi Green, with whom Ray performed the "Funny Valentine" number. The show opened at the Shubert Theatre on April 14, 1937, moved to the Majestic Theatre on October 25 and closed on December 18 after a good run of 289 performances.
Eddie Blick (talk) 03:54, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trimming content
Talk:Más y Menos

message: The powers section needs a heavy rewrite, as it currently juxtaposes the Cartoon, Cartoon's comic, and DCU comic versions into one mangled section. The cartoon and cartoon's comic continuities haven't addressed the speed force, while the DCU has. Tis should all be sorted within the article to reflecthte different versions. ThuranX 15:57, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean-up needed 

message: Final Crisis #5 features a spanish speaking metallic man with Manos' colors. I wonder if it is related. Lots42 (talk) 09:01, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Final Crisis #5 

message: they're good, but not as good as Kid Flash.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pborri (talk • contribs) 16:24, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Um...did something get deleted from your comment? Lots42 (talk) 01:39, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The twins 
Talk:Belgian Holocaust denial law

message: I have moved and remaned "Belgian Negationism Law" to "Belgian Holocaust denial law", because the word Negationism is little used in English  and when it is unlike the French word Le négationnisme it is not Holocuaust specific (see Negationism). So using it here particularly with a captial "N" in the title creates a neologism. --Philip Baird Shearer 15:39, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Negationism and neologism
Talk:Michael Pelkey

message: Maybe this should be moved to a more proper title. The article is not about the guy, it's about the jump. Pascal.Tesson 23:25, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Move?
Talk:Austria women's national football team

message: Have cut this section, as at the moment it's just creating a mass of red links ! thisisace 22:10, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Rafael Carrera

message: I would like to make clear that Gral. Carrera was not exactly an native guatemalan person. There is written evidence that he was actually, a mestizo person, belonging to the low class of the New Guatemala's City. He, obviously has, as the 95% of guatemalan people, some indian bloodline, in some degree, but it is incorrect make an statement as one of them. --Dardón López J.R. 01:44, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: The article currently said that Carrera took the style "president for life" in 1854.  Of the article's two citations, one yields a "404" and the other (Catholic Encyclopedia) says he became president in 1854 and president for life seven years later.  As El Presidente would say, "¿qué?"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by TypoBoy (talk • contribs) 15:30, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  date of "presidency for life" 

message: This article includes many citations to Fernando González Davison's novel "La montaña infinita : Carrera, caudillo de Guatemala", which does not appear to be a reliable source. According to Worldcat, this book is "fiction" and is a "historical novel". A fictional work should definitely not be cited in a Wikipedia article about an actual historical figure. Why has this source not been removed?113.29.228.232 (talk) 04:44, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Montaña Infinita 

message: In the infobox "1st President of Guatemala" is not enough. He was reelected after 4 other presidents. Aminabzz (talk) 13:39, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  1st and 5th President of Guatemala
Talk:Bag of Oats

message: The page was turned into a redirect with no explanation. The 2nd time it was turned into a redirect and said "don't revert unsourced content." Most of the information (as with many album pages) is sourced from the album sleeve. If you feel this is not notable enough to be on WP that is a different argument, but the infobox and tracklist info does not need a source. BeastmasterGeneral 12:45, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I reinstated the info and removed unsourced content. The remaining content is from the album sleeve and I could add a source to the album sleeve if necessary. BeastmasterGeneral 12:48, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Saying it was turned into a redirect without explanation is disingenuous, the article has been tagged as unsourced for over a year. I'll redirect the article unless citations to reliable sources are added. PhilKnight (talk) 13:40, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The current article lists only information that is found in the CD booklet. On all the other album pages I have viewed this information is not cited. If you want I can add a cite to every line or section saying that it came from the booklet. I removed the unsourced tag since I removed all information that was unsourced and not found in the booklet (tracklist, band name, record label, year, line-up). I feel changing the article to a redirect is sidestepping the current system of deleting/merging articles. BeastmasterGeneral 18:26, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the verifiability policy "If no reliable, third-party sources can be found for an article topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it." Consequently, unless citations to third-party sources are included, the article should be redirected. PhilKnight (talk) 18:47, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Turned into redirect
Talk:United States Air Force in Thailand

message: "Out of the Thai bases flew the most extraordinary air-combat team that had ever been assembled."
Really? The most extraordinary *ever* assembled? This whole paragraph seems rather over the top in its writing style. Unless there's objection, I'd like to eliminate a bit of the puffery here and replace it with a little Plain English.
Winterbadger (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 17:54, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peacock wording 

message: ...is lousy. Needs to show all of Vietnam, at least, and label all other countries. Labels need transparent bg (or at least tight to text, like Ubon & Nakhon). WP used to have such good maps ~ Sadsaque (talk) 04:16, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map 

message: KC-135 aircraft on Young Tiger deployments rotated to Takhli RT Air Base, Thailand, for air refueling operations (typically F105s)
173.30.145.6 (talk) 23:15, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  RT Airbase at Takhli 

message: In addition to the 388TFW was the 7th ABCCC.  Flew C-130's with a command and control capsule loaded and controlled the air power into and out of the zone.  24 hour coverage 7 days a week.2601:280:5A80:3A00:9C42:BE4A:6F32:F0DF (talk) 23:55, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Korat 

message: I was an air force security policeman stationed at U-Tapao in 1974/75.  The title "air police" was changed to security police in 1966.  We always carried weapons, and I never heard of them not carrying weapons at any time prior to the time I was there.  Not only did we carry weapons at base entry points, but the units that defended the base perimeters carried M-16 rifles, grenade launchers and M-60 machine guns. It's possible that the Thai public and press were not told this, but it's not reality.  A quick search engine check will show plenty of proof to the contrary. ￼ 2601:5CB:C300:8480:5D02:6E4E:94B6:D8D7 (talk) 19:41, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Thai air police controlled access to the bases; U.S. air police who helped them did carry weapons."
Talk:North Korea women's national football team

message: I wonder; Will Kim Il Jong be sending his wonderful, Magical, Invisible Phone along with the team to this one as well?--Subman758 (talk) 17:26, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Magic Invisible Phone 

message: I think the unreferenced material added in this edit (by an editor with the improbable name of ) is unsuitable for the lede section.  If actually true, can it be moved to a more suitable section?  Astronaut (talk) 18:10, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lede section 

message: Sorry, by all means, half of the article focuses on making fun of North Korea. Seriously, grow up western world! Not only making fun of their coach, and being arrogant... the article goes even furhter, e.g. who effin' cares if Kim had 5 holes-in-one in golf when reading an article about a soccer team?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.84.125.50 (talk) 20:08, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: If you see unencyclopedic content in an article, you can remove it, using the "edit" function. And I quite agree: This is an encyclopedia article, not a humour website. Aridd (talk) 16:21, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bashing North Korea?
Talk:Mexico women's national football team

message: There reads: The team has a professional league, the Super Liga Femenil de Futbol
Sounds very strange. I doubt the team has it. I assume the Mexican Football Federation "has" it. Or is that some kind of saying/phrase which is normal in English language? 82.141.126.42 (talk) 06:07, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  team has a league? 

message: There are two sub-sections in the players section that seem to contain information largely irrelevant to the national team. Few directly refer to player records playing for the national team; rather, it's a mix of club-level/amateur accomplishments and post-retirement careers. These should be included in individual player/team pages. Mightytotems (talk) 10:50, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Unless there are objections, I've removed those not relevant to international level. Mightytotems (talk) 12:04, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Irrelevant information in players section
Talk:Morocco women's national football team

message: Flashscore records Poland as the upcoming first opponent for Morocco. However, Google lists only Canada as the friendly opponent for Morocco. Moroccan media doesn't mention the name of Poland on its friendly list in October, nor even Polish media mentions it. So instead of adding "Poland", wait until there is a confirmation from FRMF. HiddenFace101 (talk) 09:18, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Morocco will play with two or just one in October?
Talk:Netherlands women's national football team

message: I took the data (the columns #, Player, Caps, and Goals) for the current squad from the KNVB supporters website , but I think the numbers (#) are wrong and the numbers of goals (Goals) seem much too low. – Editør (talk) 22:42, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current squad 

message: Mid 2017 the KNVB (Dutch football union) created a specific, official, logo for the women team see e.g. . The logo is very similar to that of the men's squad but featuring a lioness rather than a (male) lion. The current page feature the male team logo (note that this is not the official logo of the football union which can be found at the top of the KNVB article. So my question. Can we provide the official women's team logo here? (I dont have a good, copyright free image version nor do know how to get it) Arnoutf (talk) 19:32, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do we have the official lioness logo image? 

message: Because these days, because of Covid, we have the situation where a qualifying campaign already starts before a previous tournament has been played, section 4 Overall official record, is getting harder to follow. Since there are no dates in that section, I propose we put the qualifying results directly before final tournament results. --Dutchy45 (talk) 15:26, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ordering of tournaments and qualifying campaigns 

message: I originally overhauled the FIFA world rankings section, to have it look like this 1. Another editor changed it fairly quickly to what it looks like now. I thought that was not an improvement, but since I have zero interest in embroiling myself in a edit war, I left it as is. However, since then it has continued to bug me so I decided to take this here, to see what others think? Dutchy45 (talk) 04:07, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Your version is terrible on a mobile device. This talk page is unlikely to get much traffic, so I think if you want to raise it at the appropriate place, that is Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football. Matilda Maniac (talk) 23:45, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I wasn't aware of the mobile device problem. Something to think about (thank you). If I decide I still want to go through with it, I will first bring it up at the project. Dutchy45 (talk) 04:11, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  FIFA world rankings section
Talk:New Zealand women's national football team

message: I found in rsssf.com saying that New Zealand women team join Asian Women's Championship and won in 1975 at Hong Kong. Any idea? --Manop - TH 08:28, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  First match  

message: The new name is the "football ferns" --Kingliam1 12:44, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Name 

message: In the last revision I edited, I found duplicate named references, i.e. references sharing the same name, but not having the same content. Please check them, as I am not able to fix them automatically :) 
* "OFC" :
** 
** 
DumZiBoT (talk) 05:07, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bot report : Found duplicate references ! 
Talk:Norway women's national football team

message: i personally watched the last world cup the team participated in and i remember that they made it to the final but lost there.84.213.45.196 (talk) 23:07, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: This IP lives in a fantasy world and has spread various fabricated lies about Norway across a variety of Wikipedia talk pages. And to answer their comment above, in 2011 it was Japan vs USA in the final. Wes Mouse | T@lk 03:05, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  there appears to be a considerable number of errors 

message: :File:Norges Fotballforbund - Norway Norge.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a non-free use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
-- Marchjuly (talk) 00:34, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for File:Norges Fotballforbund - Norway Norge.png

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Norway women's national under-20 football team. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 19#Norway women's national under-20 football team until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Seany91 (talk) 14:39, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Norway women's national under-20 football team" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Philippines women's national football team

message: Don't they use a different kit compared to the men's team? I think they use an all-red away kit with white sides, which they used in the recent AFF Women's Championship. Please check. Bernejay (talk) 06:41, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kit 

message: I changed the box to show a new high FIFA Ranking of 67th in the rankings released 12 July 2019.  However, the box still gives a date of 29 March 2019, and I don't know how to edit Reference 1 to change the date.  The link to the rankings is the same, but the date the rankings were released and retrieved needs to be updated.
EvanJ35 (talk) 12:52, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: You may refer to Template:FIFA Women's World Rankings, although I haven't updated the rankings myself to since this template has been introduced. Someone else updated the rankings already after you posted your concern here. I'll be reverting back the template, but the updated rankings should still reflect.Hariboneagle927 (talk) 05:46, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Ignore the last part. The rankings are now updated. Updating the rankings though the module takes time to reflect on the articles themselves.Hariboneagle927 (talk) 05:53, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  How Do I Edit The References? 
Talk:Scotland women's national football team

message: How can this be the case when they have never qualified for the UEFA Women's Championship? Yesterday they got beaten 4–0 at home by Norway. Målfarlig! (talk) 13:18, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: That is an unprovable peacock term and has therefore been removed. Although it is fair to note that they left out some of their better players for yesterday's game . Jmorrison230582 (talk) 13:23, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: "One of Europe's strongest teams"
Talk:Portugal women's national football team

message: Hebdbdbdbzv vdh3ue 59.89.227.114 (talk) 17:02, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Portuguese 

message: H 204.195.98.106 (talk) 03:05, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Has Portugal ever won the women’s world cup