lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Fra Lippo Lippi

message: This is my initial attempt at a page for Fra Lippo Lippi--the painter, not the band.  
What it still needs (obvious needs):
*Citations
*Image of Lippi, and his paintings
:Perhaps disambiguation pages that point to Fra Lippo Lippi (Artist) and Fra Lippo Lippi (Painter) --Grinning Fool 17:55, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, more to the point, a disambiguation page between the band and the artist.  I have used the word artist and painter interchangably.  Perhaps that is a mistake.
Disambiguation pages complete.  Citations for the painter complete--65.254.3.2 12:09, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Beacon Mountain

message: The more I think about it, the more that the incline railway deserves its own article per WP:NRHP. Any objections? If not, I'll do it in a few days. Daniel Case 05:24, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There are no objections, it is so moved. Daniel Case 03:16, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Madagascar dry deciduous forests

message: Are there only three distinct isolated forests, or are there more, but only three are mentioned in the article? Deuar 20:44, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: excellent point. ive revised the intro to reflect the fact that there are numerous forests within this biome. the basis of selecting three is that many of the forests are not discussed in the literature, some not even defined, named or catalogued (possibly not even cited) in prior works. this is a very unexplored region! cheers. Anlace 22:11, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A very nice article. We need more of this! — mark ✎ 18:20, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are there only 3 forests? 
Talk:Nevėžis

message: I am not an expert in etymology but have done some research in river names and can safely state that the unreferenced etymology given in the article is purely fantastic folk etymology. Probably this hydronym has to do with hydronymic root *nep.Aldrasto11 (talk) 08:03, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology 
Talk:La Paloma

message: This is also a town in Uruguay.Bronayur 04:06, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uruguay 

message: I have added the  tag. This article has numerous issues, including the publishing of the lyrics, lack of references, a trivia section, and an excessively long list of movies.
88.77.159.142 (talk) 05:57, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  cleanup tag added 

message: La paloma venne registrataa a Madrid  proprieta' artistica di De Iradier nel 1859.
Quindi è errato dire che il motivo è del 1861  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.20.95.41 (talk) 12:53, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  origin of La paloma 

message: I am here preserving the following paragraph that had been removed because of "unreliable source":
:==Most recored song?==
:Guinness World Records lists Yesterday by the Beatles as the most recorded song with apparently about 1,600 recordings. It has been suggested that "La Paloma" has more than 2,000.
I assume that "trikont" is judged to be the "unreliable source". The paragraph, however, does not claim that "La Paloma" is the most recorded song - a difficult status to ascertain in any case -; it is just questioning the claim concerning "Yesterday" in view of the long popularity of "La Paloma". I am sure there are other candidates, among them possibly "White Christmas, Happy Birthday" and "Amazing Grace". The removal of the paragraph - based on a judgment of the reliablity of the reference - deletes a recognition that there some controvery about the "most recorded" claim, and that "La Paloma" may belong to the candidates.Ekem (talk) 15:55, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed it, as the accepted most recorded song is Yesterday. The Trikont link is to a record company. I don't see this as a reliable neutral source as it's essentially ad copy and they would have a vested interest in establishing the claim to sell the CD. If other sources could be found to at least establish that there are claims for La Paloma, I don't have a problem with including it in the article. I have no idea what criteria Guinness Book of World Records uses and there certainly is the possibility of a systemic bias in favour of an English-language song over a song that may be on numerous small or obscure (to English-language audiences) record labels. I don't think this is a big deal in either case, however as the claim is established for Yesterday and is generally accepted, we would need more than a commercial source. freshacconci talktalk 16:25, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Re: Most recorded song?
Talk:Raisbeck Aviation High School

message: Hey, fellow Wikipedia users,
It is Johnny Russell. I have just finished adding some courses to the AHS Wikipedia page. If anyone finds an error or a gap in my course list, please feel free to fix it.
Also, we should get the school logo up in here. That would greatly improve the appearance and content of this page.
Peace out, mis hermanos.
--johnnyrussell (talk) 22:12, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  We should get a logo up in here. 

message: one of the better secondary school articles from Washington State.
for a class project, it would be great to add additional sources to the few, more mundane, facts that remain uncited.
have a wikipedia day, kids.
Augmented Seventh (talk) 21:10, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  great article
Talk:Chieveley services

message: The article says:
Chieveley services is a UK motorway service station on the M4 motorway near Newbury. It is owned by Moto. Although it is owned by Moto, it is no longer signed from the M4, as Reading services are nearby. You can still access it from M4 J13 though, and it is also useful for traffic on the A34.
Which kind of raises more questions than it answers:
* Why 'although'?. Does Moto normally get some form of preferrential signage?.
* If it is on the M4, why do you need to access it via another road?.
* What is near?. Reading services must be at least 15 miles from Chievely.
-- Chris j wood 18:21, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup needed 
Talk:Tamamo-no-Mae

message: Recommend the merger of the two articles, as they are essentially facets of the other.  Also recommend a partial merge of stuff from Sessho-seki, with that becoming a fork article.  Any thoughts?--み使い Mitsukai 18:21, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger

message: Hi.
I was wondering; does the legend explicitly say if Tamamo-no-Mae was truly plotting against the Emperor, as the astrologer claimed, or is there room for ambiguity on whether or not she was (intentionally or otherwise) trying to harm him? 
As in, could the astrologer have been trying to get rid of her, or something? --Nerroth (talk) 23:56, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The article says "an kind nine-tailed kitsune", so if it meant to say "a kind nine-tailed kitsune", then she had no real malice in her.  But the article also says her boss was using her to try to kill the Emperor.  So yeah... she was intentionally plotting against the Emperor, but I. at least, am inferring she had no choice in the matter.  No wonder she became an onryō after Miura-no-suke killed her.  173.180.75.13 (talk) 10:02, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Illness question 

message: The page states:
Stories of Tamamo-no-Mae being a legendary fox spirit appear during the Muromachi period as otogizōshi (prose narratives), one of which is titled Tamamizu monogatari (or "The Tale of Tamamizu") [1]
I seem to recall that tamamizu monogatari is a completely separate story about a kitsune falling in love with a girl. It is possible that tamamo-no-mae is mentioned as a prominent fox spirit but I highly doubt the appears as a character, in which case the phrasing here is misleading.
My Japanese is not nearly good enough to consider checking this myself, but I did find the Japanese language page for 玉水物語 (tamamizu monogatari) makes no mention of 玉藻の前 (tamamo-no-mae). Additionally, neither does the quoted source [1] (https://rmda.kulib.kyoto-u.ac.jp/en/item/rb00013653/explanation/otogi_01)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tsukiyomin (talk • contribs) 14:19, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, this looks like it's totally unrelated to me. It doesn't seem like anything was taken from that story either, other than just linking it to this page. I wouldn't have a problem with removing that link/reference. Osarusan (talk) 05:39, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, given some elements, I would not be hugely surprised if there was some kind of link there as far as the literary or folkloric development, but they're definitely not the same story and I don't have any hard evidence or sources on this. 2602:61:7B5B:401:EC47:29C9:5B25:F974 (talk) 22:13, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  On the mention of tamamizu monogatari
Talk:Mixtón War

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*support, sounds quite reasonable to me. No issue with a move. --cjllw ʘ TALK 13:31, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: While it's a minor detail, it is not "dubious" as an editor has claimed.  Ritual cannibalism was common among the Indians of Mexico.  The specific reference which I will add to the text says of Juan de Arce that "le mataron, y asado se le comieron" which I would translate as "they killed him and they ate him roasted." I don't claim to speak perfect Spanish, especially 18th century Spanish, so if somebody wishes to contest that translation, fine.  Or if this particular passage is considered too trivial to include in a Wikipedia article I will remove the reference and simply say, "they killed him"  However, the fact that the Indians ate Sr. Arce would seem to me to be an useful indicator of the Indian's hatred of Arce and hatred of the Spanish in general. And it would seem also that their hatred was well justified.  User: Smallchief 22:28, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It is of course true that many mesoamerican peoples practised ritual cannibalism - but there are very few cases in which this is known to have happened to Spaniards. I think it is problematic because those kinds of statements were often made by spanish officials about Indians in order to justify their extermination - I would say that the value of the claim depends very much on the kind of documentary primary source the claim stems from. That is what I would like to know more about in order to evaluate the claim of this particular case of cannibalism. Could y provide information about the source that Padilla, D. Matias de la Mota used to back up the claim? Where did he, writing 200 yers after the event know it from? Also how would their eating him be indicative of a special hatred if they usually ate their enemies? ·Maunus·ƛ· 22:44, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Roasting and Eating Juan De Arce
Talk:Santa Monica College

message: I don't doubt SMC is a good school, at least possibly the best community in California. However, this article consisted only of positive content about SMC and made me feel like there is information suspression and hence not NPOV... Samuel Curtis 18:25, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A vague sense of something being wrong is NOT sufficient grounds for a POV tag. You need to name something concrete that can actually be fixed or discussed. --Calton | Talk 20:14, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

text: I agree there might be some astroturfing to promote the college's sports programs, but it requires work on your part to improve upon the article. Elryacko (talk) 23:15, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  Have you even been to college, dumbass? you got no authority to make a judgement.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.234.139.9 (talk) 02:03, August 30, 2007 (UTC) 
Seems like sourcing on the transfer rate is a bit dated. Source #3 is dead and source #2 is from '07. 98.182.22.36 (talk)   — Preceding undated comment added 10:12, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

text: I look forward to your edits. int21h (talk · contribs · email) 02:34, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV issues

message: The newspaper doesn't meet WP:N independently, but could be a worthwhile section here. Boleyn (talk) 14:58, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Support. Thank you for looking for a place for this content @Boleyn. If someone can build it out someday, great, but for now, this looks like the right thing to do. jengod (talk) 17:19, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

text: Support - This is a good idea. - UtherSRG (talk) 18:45, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal: [[The Corsair (Santa Monica College newspaper)]] to here
Talk:Furongian

message: I have found no evidence that a major paleobiological or geologic group endorses this term as a substitute for the Upper/Late Cambrian period of the Paleozoic era on the geologic timescale.
Please comment.
 --- Remark by Dr.Bastedo 
:It is used on the printed version of the 2004 International Geologic Time Scale of the ICS.  I have not checked the on-line ICS. --Geologyguy 18:48, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Talk:Furongian
Talk:Relaxation technique

message: While cleaning up, I deleted some text and a couple of links.  I deleted the two-sentence section "In the media" because media attention to the subject was discussed elsewhere in the text.  The links I deleted were to commercial sites that offered relaxation products, but no particular information about techniques.  Pastafarian Nights 18:32, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: My preference is to list references in the order they appear in the article; that they are currently web-only references first, and in alphabetical order overall is purely coincidental.  Pastafarian Nights 00:00, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: References boldly formatted. - - MrBill3 (talk) 22:33, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  References rationale 

message: I deleted masturbation from the list of techniques.  While I'm sure plenty of people do use masturbation to relax, I'd be mighty surprised if it appeared on any other list of relaxation techniques.  I think including it makes the article seem less serious, rather than more encyclopedic.  If some other source suggests masturbation as a means of relaxation, I think it'd be fine to put it back in, with a citation.--Pastafarian Nights 18:25, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleting Masturbation 

message: I've removed it from the list of techniques - maybe there should be a section on Relaxation technique during  Labor and Childbirth (or a seprate article) but it can't be clasified as a relaxation technique.  Zabdiel 14:03, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleting Labor and Childbirth 

message: Body scan meditation is a specific and ancient aspect of Buddhist meditation. I tried to look up information about it, but through a series of forwards, it ends up here, a deleted article that is not relevant to Buddhist body scan meditation techniques. maybe someone can fix?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.241.60.51 (talk) 10:06, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  There is a mistake with the forwarding 

message: — Assignment last updated by Johnshopkinsuni (talk) 18:39, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Communicating the Fundamentals of Epidemiology
Talk:.38 ACP

message: The .38 ACP is the 38 Super.  There is no reason for a second article.  It's covered under the 38 Super article just fine.  Please discuss it here instead of getting into a revert war.--Asams10 18:33, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think its covered there enough. It may be a development of it, but they are not always compatible. They have different introduction dates and history. I don't think it hurts to have a small article here with a link to the main article at .38 ACP. Ve3 19:08, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

text: In fact its not covered at all there, with only one small mention;that is not fine. Ve3 19:17, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Look I just really think it can stand on its own as article, as much as it may be overshadowed by .38 super. There are just so many things that true for one that are not for the other. Wheather a merge was a good idea would depend on how it was done, I certainly am not ruling it out-I just don't think it is the right direction. 04:23, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Allright tell you what, we will do it your way. I think you have had enough arguments of late on here... Ve3 05:47, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  The .38 ACP is not the 38 Super anymore than the .223 Remington is the 5.56 x 45 mm NATO. They should each have their own articles. Arthurrh 03:14, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect

message: Article says it was first used in 1897, but designed in 1900? Sounds like it should say it was designed in 1897. Jimhoward72 (talk) 08:34, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  1897 or 1900?
Talk:Cleft chin murder

message: Why were these known as the "cleft chin" murders?  Did the perpetrators and/or victims all have cleft chins?  Was it metaphorical?  This is a glaring omission.  For all I know, the answer is well-known in the UK but for a more global persepctive, this information should be included. --Icarus 18:33, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There are plenty of google references to the name: http://www.stephen-stratford.co.uk/chelft_chin_case.htm states that the taxi driver had a cleft chin, hence the name. Note it refers to it as murder in the singular. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by TheoGB (talk • contribs) 11:26, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleft Chin Murder

message: I've read more about this murder and the film made about it featuring Kiefer Sutherland and after re-reading Orwell's essay I am 99% certain that only one victim was claimed. I am going to create a Cleft Chin Murder page and edit the information with some cited refernces and redirect Cleft Chin Murders to there.Surferwoz 13:28, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Page Re-Direct and Edit Proposal

message: Where did this all take place? There is a lack of information regarding locations. FruitMonkey (talk) 18:01, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This all took place in England, as the page says more than once. —Paul A (talk) 05:56, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: England is a relatively large place. 24.164.163.77 (talk) 14:24, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The article no longer even mentions England all hint of a location or scene of a crime appears to have been removed from the article. Precisely where a crime takes place is a rather significant piece of information as it determines which legal jurisdiction investigates and prosecutes the case. Even saying London is not precise enough because are we dealing with the Metropolitan Police or the City of London Police, for example. So Where did this happen? - Cameron Dewe (talk) 11:49, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Near Staines in Middx. Quick ref added. --Mervyn (talk) 12:25, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Location
Talk:The Scottish Play

message: Seeing as there seems to be users intent on adding the Chris Rock and Will Smith incident, despite the edits being reverted with the reason being it has nothing to do with the curse, might it make sense to at least temporarily put protection on the article? The HenBasket (talk) 03:43, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The reverts appear to have been incorrect, and now it's properly cited, so probably no need. JackHahne (talk) 09:19, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Recent changes to the page have now been "memed"  on social media so it wouldn't surprise me if there are more edits incoming, but it doesn't appear protection is warranted at this time. You can alsways file a report at requests for page protection if it there is ongoing edit warring or vandalism. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:35, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protect page? 

message: I'm planning to add subheadings to the Historical Mishaps section of the article itself. It will be categorized like this: 
3. Histocical Mishaps 
3.1. 1849 Astor Place Riot 
3.2. Death of Harold Norman 
3.3. 1964 D. Maria II National Theater fire 
3.4. (not sure what will this be called, but it's about the film Opera being affected) 
3.5. Death of Bantcho Bantchevskey 
3.6. (not sure what will this be called, but it's about Alex Wolff telling Ari Aster not to say the play's name) 
3.7. Will Smith-Chris Rock Slapping Incident 
Any suggestions / ideas? Weareblahs (talk) 13:19, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subheadings on "Historical mishaps" 

message: The curse is referenced in the musical Hamilton, in the song "Take a Break" the title character says "I hope you'll understand my reference to another Scottish tragedy without my having to name the play. / They think me Macbeth..." This song is immediately followed by "Say No To This", the beginning of the Reynolds affair that ruins Hamilton's career, implying that the character's use of the Scottish Lord's name here actually does invoke the curse. Should this be included in this article? 144.121.150.162 (talk) 15:58, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hamilton
Talk:Guadalupian

message: I have found no evidence that a major paleobiological or geologic group endorses the use of this term as a substitute for the Middle Permian period of the Paleozoic era on the geologic timescale.
Any comments?--- Remark by Dr.Bastedo
:International Commission on Stratigraphy  uses the term.--Akrasia25 (talk) 01:19, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guadalupian 

message: I created the article from various sources as well as wikipedia. Permian, Therapsid, Olson's Extinction, Wordian, Roadian--Akrasia25 (talk) 12:53, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed redirect
Talk:Kuda-gitsune

message: There seems a myriad of Japanese Mythology articles in which, once you take away the Popular Culture references, the article is nothing more than a couple of sentences, unsourced, that give no more information that whatever copy-right violated image accompanying the article might suggest. Kuda-gitsune is no exception. What happened? Did everyone who rides the short bus get hold of a computer and obsessively list their favorite InuYasha episodes? (uncited, unreferenced, with only the term Popular Culture as justification to it being here?) Wiki deserves better than that. I'd love to see actual academic researchers treat this site as legitimate research and not a joke's punch line for: "what do kids suffering from ADD edit in their spare time?" Duende-Poetry (talk) 17:33, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: I Feel Like A Broken Record

message: From the article: "Kuda-kitsune or Kanko ("pipe fox") is a creature supposedly employed by Japanese kitsune-tsukai, those who use foxes as spirit familiars. Its use is described in various books, as follows:
"In the Sōzan Chomon Kishū the kuda-gitsune is described as a rat-sized fox which can be kept in a pipe."
Was there supposed to be a list of book titles here?  After "follows:" Rissa, Guild of Copy Editors  (talk) 20:30, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is something missing here?