lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Foothill College

message: I'd like to include information re the controversy surrounding the treatment of Ahmad al-Qloushi.  It's been covered in the documentary "Indoctrinate U", as well as the following article:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2005/jan/15/20050115-115940-9997r/
 
Before I add anything, I'd like to hear from interested parties.  Thanks. 74.60.172.249 (talk) 23:21, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ahmad al-Qloushi 
Talk:Homophora

message: I just totally replaced the previous entry for which there was no reference given, and for which I did not find justification.  It looked bizaar and if it wasn't bogus, it needs a reference.  O'RyanW (☺  ₪) 23:06, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was it bogus? 

message: I hereby propose that this article be merged into exophora with a redirect. It would be difficult to provide any more information with this article, hence it is a stub. If I recieve no response I may perform this merge, but am happy for this to be reverted if it turns out to be bad. User:Oliverbeatson 149.254.218.56 (talk) 14:35, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge Proposal (Exophora)
Talk:Foothill Ranch, California

message: This article flips back and forth between past tense and present tense.  Does Foothill Ranch still exist as a named place? - Elmarco 16:11, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind. My bad.  It was annexed into Lake Forest, I see that now. - Elmarco 16:13, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Many residents (myself included) still refer to the community by the original name. Usage seems to have made it's way into external databases, as usually validates as an address. pbannister (talk) 00:46, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is or was? 
Talk:Foothill Transit

message: The notes  about these buses are inaccurate.  While there is a preference to use them on the express lines and during off peak on the Silver Streak, they are used all over the system as operations require.  Some coaches were transfered to the Pomona yard for their express lines.  In exchange 1400 series buses were given to the Arcadia yard.  Which brings up another issue, while a part of the yard is in three cities, it is refered to as the Arcadia yard, because that is its address.  Saltysailor (talk) 08:46, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  1700 series NABI 42-BRT  

message: do they still operate them? I remember reading how they are no longer in use due to issues and were asking for a refund on those buses 2603:8000:5000:E9D2:F8BF:B68:36E4:3C7A (talk) 02:00, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proterra Catalyst
Talk:State Bank of Hyderabad

message: Laxmi D/o manappa eacnal Tanda 171.76.220.64 (talk) 04:06, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I want to chack my account balance 2409:40F0:101A:D2F3:8000:0:0:0 (talk) 15:15, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  62386328098
Talk:State Bank of Mysore

message: According to their website, the headquarters of the State Bank of Mysore is in Bangalpre, not Mysore. Therefore changing Category:Companies based in Mysore to Category:Companies based in Bangalore. Cfynn (talk) 17:24, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Based in Bangalore
Talk:Eclipse (mints)

message: There is some dispute over the best picture to use for this article:
thumb|left|250px|Eclipse-mints-orange-and-cinnamon-flavours.JPG or  
#As to the former, and not to impugn anyone, but on the grounds that you can't be too careful, I challenge this as being created by the uploader, as it is professionally staged (e.g., the boxes and mints are balanced with concealed holders, etc.). Pending more proof (more examples of the uploader's work, either here or on other web sites, and image information (camera, etc.) taken from the original image) I am dubious as the the provenance of this work.
#There is some dispute over which image is more free. Photographs are generally considered less free than drawings. The latter image, however, is creatively staged, which may make it a copyrightable creative work, but I'm not sure of this. Does anyone know more about this? At any rate, without knowing more I would guess that the latter image is more free.
#In the latter image, the inclusion of the black hole is intended to make the image more surely an original creative work. The inclusion of this element, although not strictly necessary, doesn't take anything away from the image.
Absent commentary to the contrary, my inclination is to restore the latter image. Herostratus (talk) 15:21, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I took the photograph of actual boxes of the product that I had purchased – you can see in the file's metadata the details of my camera, which is the same with most, if not all, of my other photographic contributions.  In similar respects with your concern raised, I believe that an actual shot of the real product is much better than a simple drawing of the product, and you can't get a better way to give the reader of the article an impression as to what the product actually looks like.  <B>S<SPAN STYLE="font-size:87%">EO75</SPAN></B> [talk] 00:22, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I'm convinced. Herostratus (talk) 18:12, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:Image:Eclipse mints.jpg]] versus [[:Image:Eclipse-mints-orange-and-cinnamon-flavours.JPG]]
Talk:NLC India Limited

message: Have done many possible changes to remove ad-like items. Have also added links to certain pages for easy access to the reader. Page warrants further improvement. Jn045 (talk) 17:31, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page looks like an advertisement
Talk:Foresthill, California

message: Sometimes the demographics get a bit silly. I quote: "... there were 1,791 people, ..., 0.06% Asian, ...". If you do the sums that 0.06% is one person! Sigh. -- SGBailey 20:09, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Demographics

message: The Note in the opening paragraph seems somewhat out of place, though I'm not sure of how to better incorporate that information in the article. It would also be useful if there were references to back up the claims being made in the note.
The last sentence, about 'Foresthill' versus 'Forest Hill' also should have a source. There is record of a 'Forest Hill' in Placer County in both the 1880 and 1890 censuses, and the spelling of 'Foresthill' for the current CDP first appeared in the census in 1980. I cannot confirm if the two places are the same, although I would presume that it is highly likely. Therefore, it would make sense that any references to historic Forest Hill be spelled as two words instead of one. If anyone can find a source that indicates when the spelling change took place, that would probably be best.
Reade (talk) 00:51, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening Paragraph 
Talk:Forestville, California

message: I removed the culture section, as the bands that were listed as having originated in Forestville were non-notable, and the other details were simply not encyclopedic (such as the dining habits of members of notable bands). 128.32.92.45 (talk) 23:17, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Deleted culture section

message: Hi fellow Wikipedians, 
I edited the School System section and added that El Molino High School was permanently shut down and integrated into Analy High School as follows:
With the start of the fall semester in 2021, the El Molino High School campus was permanently closed and its entire student body transferred to Analy High School in downtown Sebastopol. The West Sonoma County Union High School District office and Laguna High School, a continuation school, were relocated to the former El Molino campus. HLeditor (talk) 21:44, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  El Molino High School closed
Talk:Forks of Salmon, California

message: This is one of the most pristine parts of California, and is largely unknown. A picture of this beautiful area would suit this page. History of the gold rush in the area would be interesting. I plan to add information about recreation to the page--the whitewater kayaking in this area is fantastic.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Seek writ awe there (talk • contribs) 16:21, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion
Talk:Formosa Cafe

message: Reopened in 2019.
There had been some reports of a subsequent closure, but check yelp for most reent reports.
Here's the new website but you can see the archived website (as of 2009).
 Fabrickator (talk) 14:33, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  latest news as of 2023
Talk:Titan Company

message: * Disagree (weakly). If merge happens, it makes sense to have the watches a section in the industries; the other way doesn't make sense to me. --Alvestrand 05:57, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I have merged Titan (watches) with this article. I copied over some text that I thought was relevant. ɤіɡʍаɦɤʘʟʟ 22:50, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Merged Tanishq article with this one. ɤіɡʍаɦɤʘʟʟ 22:30, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal with [[Titan (watches)]] 

message: I had received the request to clean up this article from somebody who contributed to this article. Apparently, this page had promotional contents earlier and been rectified. However, since I am aware of the Titan Company, as I originate from India and this that I can contribute to this article with facts files.
Having said this, this is subject to my time permitting.
Thanks ! Ch.th (talk) 06:58, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: About updating the page
Talk:Fort Baker

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 18:21, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Fort Baker and Angel Island.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on February 26, 2011. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2011-02-26. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! howcheng  {chat} 18:11, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Fort Baker and Angel Island.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon
Talk:Fort Bidwell, California

message: Sources differ about the dates that the Army fort at Fort Bidwell was established and decommissioned.  Some times this happens.  Under Wikipedia:Verifiability, the appropriate action is to include both viewpoints.
Meanwhile, I'm currently trying to access actual Army records to see what they say. Downstrike (talk) 22:50, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It turns out that Camp Bidwell already has an article, complete with the relevant Army source citation.  It was Camp Bidwell, located near Chico, that was established in 1863. Downstrike (talk) 23:14, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discrepancies in History Section 
Talk:Union Bank of India

message: Marathi 2409:4042:E0D:143F:0:0:718A:414 (talk) 09:11, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Please refer to Marathi Wikipedia:  — DaxServer (talk) 10:05, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  UBI info in marathi
Talk:Fort Humboldt State Historic Park

message: This article is badly in need of citations to be done correctly. I appreciate the energy of the new editor recently involved in this article and the wealth of information coming into the article. I have shown an example of a recent addition to pave the way toward getting the citations properly coded so they arrive at the Notes section toward the end of the article. I hope this is both clear and helpful. Wikipedia rules do not accept parenthetical references in text. Norcalal 09:15, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations
Talk:Fort Jones, California

message: There is what looks like a personal communication cited and sections of flowery language.  Each statement of fact needs a citation, and this section is unfortunately quite lacking.  I looked for more briefly, perhaps a more intensive search would yield the sources of these statements other than personal knowledge.  Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:52, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: There are sources cited that are probably the ones for the history. Sadly not itemized with the statements. Need someone in that county or with access to said sources to look up and add the page references to the text of the history section where needed. 20:47, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: History section needs help
Talk:Fort Mason

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 19:50, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Fort Mason Center and Downtown San Francisco.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on March 27, 2011. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2011-03-27. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! howcheng  {chat} 18:46, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Fort Mason Center and Downtown San Francisco.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon 

message: While it was the core and HQ the redirect from "San Francisco Port of Embarkation" to this article is misleading at best. The SFPOE was second only to the New York Port of Embarkation in scope, size, troop and cargo shipped with functions far beyond the peacetime ones of the Fort Mason center. Need to develop the SFPOE as a separate article linking here. Palmeira (talk) 22:27, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fort Mason was not the San Francisco Port of Embarkation
Talk:Jindal Steel and Power

message: sir iwant to the steel sheet role were it is available  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.98.81.180 (talk) 09:16, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Logo is not there. New logo is 
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/07/Jindal_logo.jpg Shivan Pillai282 (talk) 07:03, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo updation
Talk:Fort Ord Dunes State Park

message: Updating importance of article from "low" to "mid" (as per Wikipedia:WikiProject_California/Assessment#Importance_scale - "Subject is only notable within its particular field or subject and has achieved notability in a particular place or area." state beaches qualify as notable protected areas, and notable in their particular geographic location.)
-- Charlesreid1 (talk) 14:58, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Changing importance to mid
Talk:Fort Ross State Historic Park

message: Why isn't the article using the Featured Photo version of the chapel?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Russian_chapel_at_Fort_Ross_(2016).jpg
2606:6000:FECD:1400:4434:916A:82F5:1234 (talk) 01:47, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo!?
Talk:Fort Ter-Waw

message: Dont know why it was deleted before but Fort Ter-Waw is the correct name for the fort on the Klamath River.  A state landmark site has the misspelling of Fort Ter-Wer and is in error, probably the reason for the misspelled  page name. I am working on California in the Civil War and Gold Rush Era, so I can find lots of confirmation of this if needed. I am fixing this on all pages linked to Ter-Wer. Asiaticus (talk) 16:11, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Fort Ter-Waw vs Fort Ter-Wer
Talk:Fort Yuma

message: In this article it says the origional fort was on the Arizona side of the river, then it was rebuilt in the 1850s on the California side. Since the fort was held by the Confederates at the beginning of the U.S. civil war, doesn't that mean the Confederates occupied a portion of California. --Aj4444 (talk) 04:14, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: As indicated in this article by the California Military Museum, it was the New Mexico territory that was held by the CSA, and not Fort Yuma itself.  Maybe this needs to be better worded.  Rather The California Column started from the fort itself, on the California side of the river. --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 12:28, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Fort Yuma

message: Was there really a fort established by the Confederates? I heard rumors that some Irish rebels built a fort there after the Union Army left the area. However, there seems to be no indication that the Union ever left Fort Yuma during the Civil War. The garrison had been suspecting a rebel attack at the fort for quite some time before the California Column made their advance. Fort Yuma was considered the key to California, and if the rebels captured it, California would fall. That is why it was considered a very important outpost and could not be abandoned. Also, I have done much research about this period and other than on wiki, I have found no other source saying that the Confederates established a base there. The small town of Arizona City, Arizona existed opposite of Fort Yuma, perhaps there were Confederate sympathizers there and maybe that is where this thing originated from. Someone has provided a source for the Confederate Fort Yuma claim though I have just finished looking over it and it says nothing about Irish rebels at a Fort Yuma in Arizona. Until reliable sources can be found, if there is any, the information regarding the Confederate fort should be deleted. I will wait a little while for a response before I make changes.--$1LENCE D00600D (talk) 00:07, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Confederate Fort Yuma
Talk:Project Madurai

message: Hello DaxServer,
Thank you very much for all of your contributions to WP. And also for taking your time to send replies.
Regd: reliability, verifiability for Tamil literature.
For ancient, other public domain works, sources of e-text are
1) Project Madurai
2) Tamil Virtual University now renamed as Tamil Virtual Academy
3) Tamil Wikisource.
Mainly availability of titles at all, and ease of access regarding specific citing as reference, significantly differs among the above.
Regd: Wikipedia:Reliable_sources#User-generated_content.
This is helpful: Wikipedia:Reliable_sources#Context_matters, it seems very helpful for WP  articles related to Tamil literature (ancient, other public domain works).
Thanks, by contributor 2know4power (talk) 18:52, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Project Madurai- reliability, verifiability
Talk:Fountain Valley, California

message: Fountain Valley has almost no land marks at all. But landmarks can also be about really famous places in Fountain Valley.Like for example any fun place that children like alot and go there many times and is always crowded.So there are not many famous land marks in Fountain Valley.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.108.156.83 (talk) 02:38, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Landmarks
Talk:Four Level Interchange

message: A marker for Sam Helwer on the Redwood Highway in Northern California states:
"By the 1940's he was Project Engineer for the world's first four-level freeway interchange in Los Angeles; and became nationally recognized as State expert on freeway interchange design."
Reference http://www.hmdb.org/marker.asp?marker=1558
While this could refer to a different interchange, "world's first" should be unique.  Can this be verified?
Charles Keith (talk) 18:59, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Project Engineer?
Talk:2121 Avenue of the Stars

message: Quote: "The building's lobby was also featured in the opening scene of the Keanu Reeves film Speed." There is no "lobby" in the opening scene of Speed. There's also no lobby in the first several scenes of Speed. This sentence should be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.152.248.35 (talk • contribs) 21:39, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you should watch Speed over again, there are in fact a few scenes which takes place in the lobby. Sullynyflhi 14:57, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is there a reason for this sentence to be in the article?
"The Fox Plaza was the last building that Pereira worked on before his death in 1985."
It doesn't indicate who he is, what significance this person has, and why we should care that he worked on it. After running a search on wikipedia with the name there were two guys with that last name that died in 1985. So all in all this is a useless piece of information that should be deleted - or it should be better explained with links.216.191.40.149 (talk) 20:21, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What? 

message: The  LA times says it is 34 stories. Is this a difference in terms of counting? Perhaps they are not counting the first floor, so it's 34 + 1, making it 35. Or is it just an error on Wiki's part? I'm  not familiar with architectural articles. Harizotoh9 (talk) 08:39, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  35 stories tall? 

message: Trimmed the video game examples. They don't seem notable, and don't physically involve the building at all. And it's likely OR and based on just seeing it. Renamed the section "filming location", certainly it being used as a filming location is notable. Added Variety source covering Die Hard. All of the other examples will need citations, and if none are found they can be removed. Harizotoh9 (talk) 09:21, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Filming location: 

message: As part of the sale of Twentieth Century Fox assets Disney took over the lease holder agreement for 2121 Avenue of the Stars but declined to rename the building; I believe there are no longer any Disney units there So with FOX and Disney out of the picture building I believe is going to be renamed 2121 Plaza or something like that 70.32.172.12 (talk) 20:52, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name change, Fox Plaza is no more
Template talk:Playmate

message: "Expression error: Unexpected and operator.html" reads part of the template description right now (though it seems to work well enough on individual pages?) - need work? Schissel | Sound the Note! 14:01, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Unexpected and operator?

message: This template is generating dead links. (e.g.  produces , but it should point to http://www.playboy.com/gallery/view/playmates-2007-6-brittany-binger-0). As I don't understand how templates work, I can't fix it. But until it's fixed, I've placed a note about it on the usage section of the template page and greyed out the instructions. TimofKingsland (talk) 07:08, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead links 

message: When is it OK to include this template in a Wikipedia article? Is it just for use in individual Wikipedia articles about individual, notable Playboy Playmates or in list articles of past Playboy Playmates? Guy1890 (talk) 01:18, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: Could the superfluous line break before the noinclude tag please be removed? Thanks, 24.77.42.223 (talk) 05:38, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: , and thank you for the good catch! P.I. Ellsworth  ed. put'r there 02:38, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 10 May 2021
Talk:Francis Marion Smith

message: I offer a link to http://freepages.history.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~paulhawes/Personal/McKinley%20History.pdf
65.191.127.86 (talk) 15:33, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Borax Smith's Oakland Estate 
Talk:Francis P. Farquhar

message: Francis P. Farquhar deserves a more in-depth page.  I will work on it, and I encourage others who share my interest in the history of mountaineering to work on it as well.  Thank you.  Jim Heaphy (talk) 03:04, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Francis Quinn

message: This article digresses quite a bit with the bits about all the other people like "George Burns won. . .blah, blah, blah." If there is no disagreement, I will edit this article to remove the non-pertinent information in five days. Morenooso (talk) 18:15, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spurious info in this article 

message: This article is no longer Stub rated. With some improvement, it should "B" rated. Morenooso (talk) 00:53, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Article rating

message: I moved external links to inline citations. The article needs lots of work. Also I removed neutrality template-the anon editor did not say why this article was not neutral in this talk page, except to say bias-editorial comment. Thank you-RFD (talk) 14:05, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation/Removed neutrality template