lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Milnerton

message: Why exactly are Milnerton's palm trees infamous? I presume this was a simple mistake, and the palms that line the promenade were meant to be famous. I've changed 'infamous' to 'famous', if anyone knows of a widely-known unpleasant incident involving the palms they can revert it to 'infamous'. Booshank 17:20, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

message: The fist link in References and the second one in External Links are broken.  Those are the only ones tried, there may be more.2601:680:C601:3CD0:5086:D146:2006:3B19 (talk) 00:53, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken Links 
Talk:Escape crew capsule

message: Only four flying U.S. military aircraft have had escape crew capsules:[1]
    * The B-58 Hustler and XB-70 Valkyrie had individual encapsulated seats.
    * The F-111 used cabin ejection where both side-by-side seats were in a single 3000-lb capsule.[2]
    * Three of the four B-1A prototypes also used cabin ejection. They had a single capsule "roughly the size of a mini-van" [3] for all four crew members.
Uh, that's wrong...
Both the B-58 and the F-111 are retired aircraft. http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/aircraft/past.htm
The neither B-1Ahttp://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/systems/b-1a.htm and the XB-70http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/systems/b-70-can.htm never made it into service. 
The B-1B did enter service in early 80's but that uses conventional ejection seats. 
Nkuzmik 17:27, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Given that we are mentioning Thunderbirds here, is it also appropriate to mention the Starfury from Babylon 5 apparently having such an ejection system. Damburger 16:50, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Starfury 

message: This article is very american-centric. The Soyuz capsule is an escape capsule, also the Apollo system was similar. While they were not technically aircraft (except for the parachutes) they were crew escape capsules.WolfKeeper 18:50, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  American centric? 

message: I'm confused by the order of the words in the title of this article. Is "Escape crew capsule" universally used? Does no source instead use "Crew escape capsule"? The second seems more "logical".... Could someone familiar with the subject incorporate into the article a reference for this? Thanks! (sdsds - talk) 18:54, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Word order in title
Talk:Boilermaker Special

message: No photo available?  Hard to believe. . . (John User:Jwy talk) 20:52, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: Prior to the Reamer's rubber-tired vehicles, actual steam engines were employed for home games. They were from Mechanical Engineering's engine bay. A working engine would be run up to the football field and, like today, blow their whistles when Purdue achieved a goal. A commonly used engine, the Reuben Wells, a 0-10-0T, is now located in the Indianapolis Children's Museum.
Dan Bollinger (talk) 12:59, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Steam versions
Talk:History of rugby union matches between New Zealand and South Africa

message: I have changed this articles class from B to Start. Please see the assessment area of project rugby union for a more complete description of appropriate ratings. This article is more or less a list at the moment. Much more needs to be included for it to be B class. Please discuss before changing it's assessment. Thanks. - Shudda talk 23:04, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article assessment rating 

message: Maybe it would be better to call this List of All Blacks versus Springboks Test matches. I know it is a little long winded, but if it were a list it would basically be the same thing, with a lead section and maybe a paragraph summarising the history between the two. That way it could be nominated for WP:FAL without to many problems. - Shudda talk 23:02, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree..--Cometstyles 13:09, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name 

message: The rugby rivalry/friendship between NZ and SA is one of the greatest in the sport. The quality of the article would be greatly enhanced by discussing this. As a child growing up in a time when NZ didn't play SA because of apartheid there was a mystique about SA because it was the only country that had beaten the All Blacks in more games than it had lost to them. It would also be VERY interesting to see some discussion/analysis of why the winning ratio has flipped in favour of NZ since SA rejoined international rugby. 121.73.7.84 (talk) 05:36, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  More analysis  

message: Why starting in 2022 and not before, with Tri nations? Isn't counting Rugby championship wrong as it's not a series, it's within a tournament? 80.116.84.231 (talk) 21:30, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind, I saw it's two matches played both in the same place. That way works 80.116.84.231 (talk) 21:32, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rugby championship 

message: I suggest to bring in the Cavaliers tour of 1986 as it is a major moment in the two countries results. Results etc as it meant much to the Springboks and helped the All Blacks win the 1987 World cup. 
I also suggest to remove the 2022 series as it should not form part of the Series list between the countries. It merely inst a series. It was two matches that formed part of the Rugby Championship. otherwise you should include other years as well where two matches was played in one of the countries. 
I also suggest we a colom relating to the tri nations/rugby championship games each year. Maybe even the Freedom Cup as part thereof. Brenton Viljoen (talk) 08:33, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Pinchme123 (talk) 02:36, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

text: 1986 Cavaliers tour is not recognized, 2022 is two matches both played in SA, which didn't happen other Championship 79.40.205.141 (talk) 16:21, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 15 November 2023
Talk:Milk quartz

message: "Milk quartz or Milky quartz is probably the most common variety of quartz "
:Probably? Say who? Cite sources please. thadius856talk 17:46, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems that sentence came from Answers.com, specifically that article states "Milk quartz or Milky quartz is probably the most common variety of quartz and can be found almost anywhere. The white colour is caused by inclusions of minute gas bubbles and/or water during its formation."  Whoever started the article probably just used the first google result. This  has info on basic quartz, but does not mention 'milk quartz'.  It seems that while most of the internet notes that quartz in general is the most common mineral, few go into details regarding each specific type of quartz. Andyuts! 17:41, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
Template talk:NF-Board teams

message: I've updated all the NF-Board teams to just carry this template. The Non-FIFA teams template now only has non-FIFA and non-NF-Board teams, and is a lot less bloated. If someone can find the NF-Board logo, it'd be nice to put it on the template.
:What about the fact that Monaco left NF-Board in 2010? Still it is listed on the template. 85.217.22.170 (talk) 23:08, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Al-Nasr SC (Salalah)

message: Please change the name of this page from "Al-Nasar (Salalah)", to Al-Nasr Salalah.  The parenthesis in this page make it look really tacky.
Thank you. --Salalah4life (talk) 09:36, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Celtic tribes of the British Isles

message: Is there a way we can make a visual map of these tribes. I saw one once, I wish I could locate it, I believe it was on www.bbc.co.uk however my computer had a terrible virus a while back so I'm not sure if it's still on there or where it is or any thing! But, I'm not sure. Jim Bart 17:50, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article has now been merged with List of Celtic tribes as per unopposed proposal. Sarah777 (talk) 10:01, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Aww, this article surely had enough content...--Cameron* 17:25, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Nothing that I could see that wasn't included in List of Celtic tribes; and I spent some time and effort merging them. Sarah777 (talk) 22:31, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merged
Talk:Earl of Inchcape

message: Above the village of Wonersh in Surrey rises a single hill called Chinthurst. On the summit of that hill is a 4-storey circular tower said to have been built as a folly by Lord Inchcape in 1930. Sadly it is now a ruin. 
Questions, why did he built it there, who owns it now, and what is the connection between Mackay/Inchape and Wonersh/Surey ?
Michaelpwilliams@btinternet.com
The tower is known as Lord Inchcape’s Folly and was built in the 1930s. I understand that the top was built to look ruined, as opposed to having been damaged. The purpose is unclear but it was either a show of wealth and somewhere to entertain guests of the main manor house (Lutyens’ design Chinthurst Hill) although there is a rumour it was built to house the gardener’s pornography!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.227.176.43 (talk) 12:00, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
Talk:List of Touhou Project characters

message: This page needs to be updated as of August 13th 2023, as a new Touhou Project game has come out, containing multiple new characters, as well as updated art for some of them. 13 Rats (talk) 18:00, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Touhou 19
Talk:Virginia State Route 63

message: Additions:
;Wise
0.10 outside of St. Paul (1936)
This was added in 1922 (under Russell).
;Russell
10.10 (1936)
*1922 7.8? St. Paul to Dante
*1928 3.20 Dante towards Dickenson County
This adds up.
;Dickenson
15.80 (1936)
*1928 7.11 SR 114 near Fremont towards Dante
*1929 3.00 towards Dante
*1930 4.65 towards Dante
*1930-31 0.59 to Russell County
This adds up.
--NE2 18:15, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Old Man's War

message: This was the first book in Tor's recent drm-free eBook giveaway program. Should that be mentioned?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Personman (talk • contribs) 06:23, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Tor Free eBook Program

message: I took out this sentence "unlike Starship Troopers and The Forever War, where wars were fought against single alien species (the Arachnids and the Taurans)."
The first chapter of Starship Trooper is about fighting a different alien race ("the skinnies")!  In addition I think another alien species may have been mentioned in forever war (while since I read it).  Regardless, it wouldn't make much sense with just the one book so I removed the whole sentence. Makgraf 00:02, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  One Alien Race? 

message: I think we should have the John Harris cover for this page as both the Ghost Brigades and Last Colony have those, so it would continue the theme. Makgraf 01:23, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, it would make the articles consistent in thematic imagery. 70.55.90.218 (talk) 00:22, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.  They're both fantastic covers but as far as continuity goes it would be better to use the same style of cover as the other books in the series. 173.202.0.236 (talk) 07:57, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Is this it?  TJRC (talk) 20:21, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: @TJCR -- That's the one! 72.161.174.16 (talk) 23:49, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Cover

message: I would like some links & summery of discussions on this book and the technologies it hinges upon.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Litch (talk • contribs) 05:07, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Improvements

message: I think this article should be split into an Old Man's War franchise article to overview the four books of the series and the universe it takes place in. This article should be more focused on the book. 70.55.90.218 (talk) 00:24, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split 

message: So, 129.97.247.2, you keep attempting to add this: "There are, in fact, very few old people fighting in the war. Most of the essential soldiers are infant-clone hybrids, though this is never mentioned within the text."  Now, I think this is blatantly wrong, but I'm willing to be proven mistaken.  So the simple question is, if it's never mentioned within the text, how do you know?  The answer to that is presumably the reliable source you would need to make this edit and make it actually stick. —chaos5023 (talk) 12:19, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sourcing on edit-warred Ghost Brigades bit
Talk:Paul Young (singer, born 1947)

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
No consensus to move. The move while this discussion was open did not help.  Feel free to propose another move if appropriate and refrain from moves during the discussion. Vegaswikian (talk) 22:17, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Above request placed on behalf of this user, following request   - without offering any opinion on it.  Chzz  ►  18:25, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
I think it's better: "Paul Young (Mike + the Mechanics)" Juan Marley (talk) 06:38, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move
Talk:Iron Council

message: I think the claim that Iron Council draws on the western genre is misleading. There are elements of the genre in the quest for the Iron Council (particularly the character of Drogon) and in the depiction of the new railway, but they are very much subsumed by the fantasy and the Marxist-interpreted steampunk.--Jack Upland (talk) 07:03, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Western Genre?
Talk:Paladin of Souls

message: I have taken this article from 'stub' to what I hope is 'full' content. Do I remove the flags above, or is that someone else's job? Quantamike08 (talk) 16:36, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Article improvement
Talk:The Neanderthal Parallax

message: Robert's agent Ralph Vicinanza appears in Humans, taking a neandertal out for a book-deal lunch. thats cool, if you are a book industry insider.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 07:29, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Trivia

message: Surely this article should be structured around the three books, rather than around in-universe concepts. Wikipedia privileges the real world point of view, after all. Euchrid (talk) 23:04, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Structure

message: “This is interrupted by the mysterious arrival of a strange man, who despite the people who meet him believe is a Neanderthal.” 2601:985:180:F50:2D88:6ECA:A310:BB9A (talk) 11:01, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  What?
Talk:Blind Lake (novel)

message: I removed this from the article:
:Blind Lake is neither as narratively tight as its predecessor, The Chronoliths, or as ambitious as its Wilson's next novel, Spin. The plot line involving Tess is particularly clumsy and bears a striking resemblance to a Star Trek Next Generation Episode, "Imaginary Friend". As is typical of Wilson's work, though, the well defined characters and well conceived premise make the novel compelling.
Though this might be true (I've never read the book), it looks to be the very definition of POV. If someone wants to find some sources to back up this commentary, then by all means, add it back in. -- Antepenultimate 00:48, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV
Talk:Moving Mars

message: The major plot points are described correctly, but many of the secondary details of the story are garbled or confused.--JW Bjerk (talk) 14:41, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. I just read the novel, and the description here seems to be describing some a version of the book from an alternative universe, roughly similar but different in the details. Because of the factual errors I'm going to go and remove much of the plot summary and reduce it down to the high points. --71.163.150.202 (talk) 07:34, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

message: The original link to the Audio review was to "Antarctica" by Kim Stanley Robinson so I corrected it using the same reviewer but correct review.  From scratch, I would not have recommended this review myself as the reviewer spends the first quarter of the review plugging his own upcoming science fiction book! He does eventually review 'Moving Mars' —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.193.61.125 (talk) 11:39, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Audio Review
Talk:Islands in the Net

message: Obviously all these stray bold terms need to be de-bolded, copy-edit work is needed, and spoilers are not marked. I'll get to work on this article soon, but I'm new and hardly perfect at this sort of thing, help would be appreciated. The postcyberpunk article lists this book as one of the earliest, if not first postcyberpunk novel, and we should have an article of a quality that reflects the book's importance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yipely (talk • contribs) 08:15, 8 November 2006
:I've done what I can for having never read the book, but this still needs a lot more work. There's a whole lotta text there, but even though I just read the whole thing carefully, I still have no real good idea what the heck this book is really about. (What I mean to say is that the summary gets bogged down in names and specifics, and seemingly has little encyclopedic value - it could likely be a lot shorter and more to-the-point.) There were also several nonsense sentences that I left as-is (as I said, I never read the book). On a brighter note, check out that first edition cover art I dug up! Weren't the '80s amazing, folks? -- Antepenultimate 03:23, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup work 

message: Currently there is a link to the disambiguation page Red Cross in this article, when it discusses the Red Cross invading Singapore.  Can someone who is familiar with this book clarify which entity of the Red Cross is referred to there (if it is clear in the book)?  For example, is it the American Red Cross, the International Committee of the Red Cross, or something different?  If it's possible to fix that link so that it no longer points to a disambiguation page (which is always a goal), that would be awesome.  Thanks, -- Natalya 18:15, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarifying which Red Cross 

message: The Predictions section, while interesting, seem original research.
I'm not sure it should be here.
And still, could somebody introduce referenced comments linking this novel and the Azawad Tuareg rebellion in Northern Mali.
When I first heard of Azawad, I had dim recalls of this novel.
--Error (talk) 21:15, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mali
Talk:Seventh Son (novel)

message: Isn't "Seventh Son" a biblical and/or mythic reference?  It seems like there should be a seperate page about this.  See this web page: http://www.mystical-www.co.uk/7son.htm
--Animatorgeek 18:28, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mythical use of "Seventh Son" 

message: "Seventh Son" is also the title of a top ten, 1965 song by Johnny Rivers. The article on Johnny Rivers misdirects to this page. A disambiguation to an article on the song would be appreciated. Thanks! 66.17.118.195 16:23, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation Needed
Talk:Marooned in Realtime

message: This novel was the first to expound upon the idea of a Technological Singularity as both a solution to the Fermi Paradox and as a valid positive conclusion to the alleged problems predicted by Malthusians in the coming century. It is considered a seminal work in the transhumanist movement. --75.67.80.68 (talk) 09:36, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Raise Importance?

message: Why is there a "plot summary overly long" tag?  While it's not short, it contains no spoilers and neatly lays out the double-locked-room aspect of the mystery. An SF novel of this depth may require longer synopses than non-SF novels since much of the comprehensibility of the plot relies on concepts that require explaining. It may be desirable to shunt the parts of the summary that deal with technology into a separate section but, otherwise, is the summary really too long? rewinn (talk) 20:31, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Why 'Overly Long'?
Talk:Cuckoo's Egg (book)

message: If I remember the book correctly, the sentence should be: "It was not clear who fired the first shot, but the Shonunin, who had only recently become capable of interplanetary travel themselves, chased the damaged alien ship, which had lost the ability to jump through hyperspace, for two years before overpowering it." The humans had FTL drive but no FTL communication... The Hatani had no FTL. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.219.16.88 (talk) 15:44, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error?
Talk:The Big Time (novel)

message: Was the novel published in 1958 or 1957? In two different points of the article both years are indicated. I have the 1961 Ace Double edition, and it says that the novelette was published on Galaxy in 1958. Clute & Nicholls say 1958. If nobody has anything to say about that I'm going to eliminate the reference to 1957.--93.40.136.215 (talk) 20:41, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Year of Publication
Talk:Brian Hughes (musician)

message: By the way even though Brian Hughes is known for the synthesizer guitar music without words. I wanted to let you know That Brian Hughes has a rap song in "Here comes trouble (too)" in "Under one Sky"? It is a shouting rap song which took me completely by surprise because I didn't know he had a rap song with lyrics. Is this song Here comes trouble too about the 1992 L.A. riot? 
All his other songs I know so far are instrumental. Let me know if I can add the lyrics to "Here comes trouble (too)" because it is a word song. I'll be respectful and make sure it's part of the song thanks. CrosswalkX (talk) 15:59, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did you know Brian Hughes has a rap song called "Here comes Trouble (too)"?
Talk:Sheriff Hutton Castle

message: Description of site, references, cleanup of links. Malpertuis 18:50, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: To do

message: In the 'October 1480' paragraph is the Earl of Northumberland Henry Percy, 4th Earl of Northumberland - if so the redirect should be to him rather than to the generic Earls of Northumberland page. Jackiespeel (talk) 10:19, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification 

message: What sources are being used for this page? I see a lot of citation needed. Was it copied? A lot of info is missing and why are the Howards mentioned? — Lady Meg (talk) 06:40, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I have inserted some refs with regards to the Howards, and hopefully have covered off a fair few areas. I am still looking, so may have more to come. Regards. The joy of all things (talk) 11:33, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  What a mess