Talk:Tagès

message: I have edited the article and believe it has now reached NPOV. Nikos 21:40, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: But I was not successful so I put the spam tag on it, had no choice but to do so.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by JasonHockeyGuy (talk • contribs) 18:11, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  I tried editing it to make it sound more like an article and not an ad 

message: Before it said "the copy protection system deleted NPCs from the game" which is of course mince.  It's the game developers who caused the NPCs to be deleted.  It also wasn't clear that the next sentence (the one talking about false positives) therefore meant the game was silently triggering this behaviour.  Reworded to make clear. For what it's worth, tages claim on their webpage not to do blacklisting of emulator products; I'm not qualified to determine the truthfulness of that (or whether it only applies to their new products and not old ones, or whatever)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.41.11.155 (talk) 03:59, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reworded the witcher part a bit 

message: I am the original author of this article, written two years ago. I will no longer contribute to wikipedia due to the ongoing abuse of my work.
Goodbye.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.179.124.95 (talk) 17:41, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Everyone is a contributing author to the article, that you initially created the page gives you no special privilege or consideration, and the fact that you have continually attempted to prevent changes that were initiated by multiple other editors (most of whom intended to bring the article in line with encyclopedic standards) shows that you don't really understand what Wikipedia is about. Have a look at WP:OWNERSHIP, for starters. But if you're serious about leaving (this time), never mind that and have a nice day. Ham Pastrami (talk) 20:33, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

text: You are entitled to that opinion, of which you are the only editor thus far to hold. Knowing how a copy protection system works is factually neutral and pertinent to the topic. That people dislike DRM doesn't affect the neutrality of the information (plus, Tages isn't necessarily DRM, it's just copy protection). Omitting this information is tantamount to protecting the vendor's commercial interests, which is absolutely non-neutral. The comparison against open source here is a straw argument, a copy protection system can be made open source, but vendors choose not to because obscurity is the backbone of these systems... and that fact is another valid criticism of these systems. See Security through obscurity. Ham Pastrami (talk) 02:30, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Goodbye 

message: Seriously, can't you see that everyone should just agree with him?  What is this thing, some sort of exercise in socialism or something?  This guy wrote this article 27 years ago in a single titanic act of transcendent Truth and all you morons clearly don't know what you're talking about, so Mr. 79.179.124.95 should be the final arbiter of truth on this subject, and who are you anyway to edit what he wrote?  He's some random IP address somewhere and he SAYS he's unbaised and that's good enough for me, why do you people always have to nitpick about "neutrality" and "factual criticisms", can't you see you're making someone on the internet upset?  So upset that he doesn't just leave, he ANNOUNCES that he's leaving!  Only people who are Really Important announce they're leaving, so this guy MUST be really important!  Someone track this guy down and tell him to come back, wikipedia desperately needs more giant egos to get into pointless edit wars about unpopular copy protection schemes!
P.S. if anyone deletes this edit I will TOTALLY write an angry comment about leaving.  Possibly several times, in case the first one doesn't make you feel enough remorse, though I can hardly see how it couldn't.  I'll make a separate heading and everything, in case you guys want to discuss it for a while or something.  Don't worry, I won't actually leave, I'll obsessively come back and check on it just to make sure you're really sorry.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.196.168.18 (talk) 05:48, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll leave flowers by both your Wikigraves T_T (119.224.18.251 (talk) 01:17, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oh no guys, what have you done? Anonymous IP guy is taking his ball and going home! 

message: "The Tagès copy protection system is incompatible with multiple versions of the Microsoft Windows operating system, and is employed on CD and DVD discs."
Should that read "... is compatible with multiple versions ..." instead of incompatible? Or is this software I really don't want on my PC?
94.30.69.91 (talk) 16:42, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeeeeeeeeeah, you don't really want Tages on your computer. I mostly avoid games with it, it just makes life unnecessarily more complicated. (119.224.18.251 (talk) 01:18, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Tages is incompatible with at least the version of windows I'm running (win7 home premium 64bit). I installed a game and windows displayed a warning every startup about an incompatible driver being disabled to ensure system stability, even after I uninstalled it. 121.212.7.160 (talk) 15:48, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incompatible? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Tagès. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070615215952/http://www.cdfreaks.com:80/reviews/Another-Tages-blunder to http://www.cdfreaks.com/reviews/Another-Tages-blunder
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070707131354/http://sirdavidguy.coolfreepages.com:80/tages.html to http://sirdavidguy.coolfreepages.com/tages.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:45, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Maybe add a list of games that use Tages or SolidShield as it's now apparently called?
Source: PCGamingWiki
====Tagès====
*Moto Racer 3, 2001, Delphine
*The Chronicles of Riddick: Assault on Dark Athena, 2009, Atari
*James Cameron's Avatar: The Game, 2009
*Nail'd, 2010, Deep Silver
====SolidShield====
*Crysis 2, 2011, Crytek
*Need for Speed: Shift 2 Unleashed, 2011, Electronic Arts
*Dead Space 2, 2011, Electronic Arts
*Anno 2070, 2011, Ubisoft
*A Game of Thrones: Genesis, 2012, Focus Home Interactive
Inferno986return (talk) 20:50, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of games that use Tagès DRM 

message: *Crysis 2, 2011, Crytek
*Need for Speed: Shift 2 Unleashed, 2011, Electronic Arts
*Dead Space 2, 2011, Electronic Arts
*Anno 2070, 2011, Ubisoft
*A Game of Thrones: Genesis, 2012, Focus Home Interactive
Inferno986return (talk) 20:50, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: SolidShield