Talk:Child Protection and Obscenity Enforcement Act

message: What does the law say about the dislcaimer?  The Jade Knight 04:59, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disclaimer? 

message: I'm wondering if the list of companies that provide 2257 software violates the WP:EL policy.  Normally we don't have such lists of external links even if they're helpful.  The link to the Free Speech Coalition is better because it's a nonprofit industry organization, and they probably link to the software vendors somewhere from their site.  I added a link to ASACP because they're active on this.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikidemo (talk • contribs) 02:07, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links 

message: Can someone explain what "facially invalid" means? Does it mean the whole statue becomes invalid, or does it mean, just in this appeal? i.e. what does this new finding actually mean for 2257 recording keeping? Does one have to do it anymore? etc. This should be covered in more depth in the article Bilz0r 10:31, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: IANAL, but my understanding is that it means the statute (or in this case, section 2257) is not a valid law and cannot be enforced. Basically, any court in the 6th District which has a case brought before them on 2257 should throw out the charges based on it. I agree, we should have a short explanation on that, or perhaps an article on the term facially invalid itself, though we might need a lawyer to help draft it properly. -- Kesh 12:35, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Facially Invalid 

message: tuvaletiniz olayım bayanlarsınırsız çişiçerim  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.225.226.169 (talk) 00:08, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  slm 

message: I have noticed on a few non-US websites, the legal wording for 2257. An example is the British company Babeworld TV. Their disclaimer page, which was work-safe at the time of accessing, is  (the rest of the site is not work-safe). I could understand that a website being hosted in the US will need to comply with the law but am doubtful that this is always the case. The article ought to mention the extra-judicial application of the legislation and the way in which it overrides, or has a chilling effect on, other countries' ages of majority and minimum ages for pornographic modelling, both of which are often lower than in the US. 87.115.101.180 (talk) 16:03, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extra-judicial application of 18USC2257? 

message: This article is not up-to-date. A federal judge upheld the law in July 18, 2013 in FREE SPEECH COALITION, INC. et al v. THE HONORABLE ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. (see ruling here). Pretty much cementing the book-keeping requirements. (This likely has big consequences to Wikimedia Foundation and all the porn hosted in commons as well as they are now definitely required to maintain documents proof for all actors). --65.78.114.251 (talk) 01:05, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  not up-to-date 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Child Protection and Obscenity Enforcement Act. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://avnonline.com/index.php?Primary_Navigation=Web_Exclusive_News&Action=View_Article&Content_ID=278754FSC
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.freespeechcoalition.com/FSCView.asp?action=preview&coid=1044
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20071800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2007/E7-13500.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110725185948/http://www.communitydefense.org/cases/20100727.pdf to http://www.communitydefense.org/cases/20100727.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071220065803/http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov:80/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr;sid=c400d3f7be6a08a261ddf625e1187d09;rgn=div5;view=text;node=28%3A2.0.1.1.30;idno=28;cc=ecfr to http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr;sid=c400d3f7be6a08a261ddf625e1187d09;rgn=div5;view=text;node=28%3A2.0.1.1.30;idno=28;cc=ecfr
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:09, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Child Protection and Obscenity Enforcement Act. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120907220743/http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr&sid=35f5aa2b3b8abd10a735b3fbb9e0b2c5&rgn=div8&view=text&node=28%3A2.0.1.1.30.0.17.1&idno=28 to http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr&sid=454a81363130b6c9a4195f01f3ad6ffe&rgn=div8&view=text&node=28%3A2.0.1.1.30.0.17.1&idno=28
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120305060531/http://www.freespeechcoalition.com/pressreleasesmedia/114-fsc-request-delay-of-implementation-for-2257-revisions.html to http://www.freespeechcoalition.com/pressreleasesmedia/114-fsc-request-delay-of-implementation-for-2257-revisions.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090423092820/http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr&tpl=%2Fecfrbrowse%2FTitle28%2F28cfr75_main_02.tpl to http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr&tpl=%2Fecfrbrowse%2FTitle28%2F28cfr75_main_02.tpl
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr%3Bsid%3Dc400d3f7be6a08a261ddf625e1187d09%3Brgn%3Ddiv5%3Bview%3Dtext%3Bnode%3D28%3A2.0.1.1.30%3Bidno%3D28%3Bcc%3Decfr
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:40, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Child Protection and Obscenity Enforcement Act. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://archive.is/20130126114027/http://www.informationlaw.com/blog/Federal-Judge-Dismisses-Free-Speech-Coalitions-2257-Suit.htm to http://www.informationlaw.com/blog/Federal-Judge-Dismisses-Free-Speech-Coalitions-2257-Suit.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:31, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Large parts have been declared unconstitutional in 2018. https://www.freespeechcoalition.com/blog/2018/08/08/fsc-scores-major-legal-victory-in-2257-record-keeping-case/ --SamWinchester000 (talk) 04:12, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lawsuit of 2018