lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Shayan Chowdhury Arnob

message: As suggested at the above AfD. Bubba hotep 19:53, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggested merge

message: information about his most famous song Shey Je Boshey Ache should be included in the article.Tarif from Bangladesh 18:29, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  The song deserves a separate article. --Zayeem  (talk) 10:43, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: info about song

message: The musician is by far one of the most popular artistes in Bangladesh. Hence, the quality of the article needs to be upgraded and a lot of informations needs to be added in the article. I'm suggesting a new sub article for this titled "Discography of Arnob" considering the amount of successful works by the artiste. --Zayeem  (talk) 10:43, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Zayeem, go for it. We need more deshi people who will pitch in with their own improvements to Wikipedia. --Peripatetic (talk) 11:22, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Status of the article 
Talk:The King's Hospital

message: Old for Ireland. This school needs a better page with complete refs and more pics. 400 years of history - there must be more ... alumni? Victuallers 19:54, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assess

message: Why is J. J. Butler notable? --BwB (talk) 08:11, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable Headmasters 

message: Do we have any details on fees. The website for this school only shows a deposit of €1000 (€3000 for international) I would imagine having a rough guage of what the cost for students attending today would inform alot of people on how this school was able to produce so many notable people.
Also is this a Church of Ireland only or is it accepting other religious groups. Eamonn Cooper (talk) 07:32, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Details missing
Talk:Red Wheel/Weiser

message: The references provided are actually writer's desk references.  I have the 2009 edition of the Writer's Market in my bookshelf at home.  They do not provide second party commentary, they are mainly a collection of primary sources on submission guidelines for publishers.  I've launched an AfD.Simonm223 (talk) 18:16, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: At Weiser Antiquarian Books we say much more about this company's oldest imprint and its founder Samuel Weiser than we say here. Perhaps some of the now-five "Famous authors" should be mentioned there as well as or rather than here, or their biographies should link the other article.
Now I retarget the personal redirect  to point there and I add the {WP Books} banner to both pages. --P64 (talk) 17:22, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weiser Antiquarian Books 

message: Weiser Antiquarian Books, now located in York, Maine (About Us), now uses "Samuel Weiser Publishing" to designate, evidently, what we call the publisher "Samuel Weiser, Inc." established in 1956
U.S. Library of Congress gives usage "S. Weiser" for "Samuel Weiser (Publishing)".
* 
No catalog records means none by the publishing company as creator (or author: writer, illustrator, photographer), which would be materials such as its own catalogs. I don't know whether the catalog can be searched effectively, or at all, for works by publisher.
The Polish NUKAT gives "Samuel Weiser, Inc.‏" "Samuel Weiser." "‏Weiser Books.‏" as tracing for a corporate name for the established form of a corporate name "Samuel Weiser Publishing.‏" (NUKAT|n 2013066787 at VIAF)
--P64 18:06 --P64 (talk) 18:13, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Samuel Weiser Publishing
Talk:Browning BDM

message: I have to laugh.  This article provides interesting and specialized information or some very rare firearms and it is criticized.  Well, I have searched the internet and have found only one external source with information on the same firearms.  Only one, and it is not an academic publication so it likely would not be considered to be an acceptable reference.  So what is a supposedly Web 2.0 Encyclopedia to do?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.246.225.67 (talk) 14:22, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:Estling Lake

message: I was wondering if anyone knows who Estling Lake was named after?  My maiden name is Estling and I am trying to do some geneology work on it.  
N.Thorne
There seems to be no clear answer to your question.  According to the book, Estling Lake Then and Now, it may have been named after the chief engineer of the project to build the 80 acre lake.  There is also the possiblity that the lake takes it's name from the term "east line" (which had to do with the railroad routes at the time) and this became Estline and eventually Estling.  Estline is the way the name appears on some of the old maps of the lake.
APG85 23:37, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Estling Lake Name

message: Se pueden meter al lago las personas a que numero se puede llamar o es publico 173.2.89.53 (talk) 16:41, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hola
Talk:AMD-65

message: No Pictures????  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.146.212.81 (talk) 08:06, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

message: imperial war museum london has one captured in Vietnam, was the first example of the type to be evaluated in the West. It shows signs of damage from Claymore Mine fragments.
http://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/item/object/30030077  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Man74 (talk • contribs) 23:36, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vietnam war 
Talk:Sara Northrup Hollister

message: See , and . Cirt (talk) 17:04, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding source for name 

message: Just leaving this here. Since someone thinks I'm stepping on their toes, someone else can do these edits if they want to, cuz I'm out.
* The Evans citation: Add 
* Add a timestamp to the "Secret Lives" citation:  (time stamp obtained via YouTube)
* I'm quote fond of using  in citations whenever OpenLibrary.org has an ebook version available (makes for easy verifications... and googlebooks sucks) and using  whenever there's a Wikipedia article for a book. Here are some better citation structures for four of the book used in this article. 
* Freedom magazine is blacklisted, so that might also suggest not quoting from it. Also, see WP:MANDY.
** If you decide to keep it, then cite magazine, not cite web (gives error message due to missing URL). Here's the URL if you're interested → 
* The citation using "5106C28" refers to a quote that comes from an obscure version of tape II, not tape I. Due to physical limitations of the tape material and recording devices, when Hubbard spoke longer than, say, 1.5 hours, his recordings wound up on two separate tapes. They were cataloged separately and sold to students as two separate tapes. If you do nothing else, at least say "part II".
** By obscure, I mean that three of the sentences in the quote ("Every effort was made to butcher my personal reputation. A young girl is nearly dead because of this effort. My wife Sara.") do not appear in some versions of the transcripts for the lecture. It is not unusual for the Church of Scientology to excise audio from a lecture and modify the published transcripts to match their revisionist histories. The version I was able to locate with the three sentences was a Word DOC file from 1998, origin unknown.
Grorp (talk) 05:09, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fixes someone else can do
Talk:Cowal Highland Gathering

message: * A history of the Cowal Highland Gathering (1957) . WL Inglis - can't find anywhere?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ostrichyearning3 (talk • contribs) 00:12, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Barrett M95

message: I know there are pictures of this, so can anyone put one on here?  It's a slick looking rifle.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pickledawg (talk • contribs) 17:18, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done!--Amendola90 (talk) 12:23, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: The picture shows two snipers from the Spanish Marine Brigade (BRIMAR). They belong to the 2th Landing Battalion's Recon Platoon (SERECO, BD II). They were covering a boarding party formed by fellow marines from the Special Operations Unit (Unidad de Operaciones Especiales, UOE). I  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.44.139.14 (talk) 05:39, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture caption
Talk:Benelli CB M2

message: Why on earth does this article go on about the "failure" of the G11? That sounds like they never got it to work right. The rifle did function, and would have been introduced in the German armed forces, but for the end of the cold war. Or, "Peace broke out" as we say. The project was cancelled mainly due to the German reunification, not due to technological issues. --88.67.162.191 (talk) 21:31, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  G11 "fail"
Talk:Lloyd Nolan

message: The phrase "freedom of religion to freedom from religion" is not just an opinion. It's ridiculous. I'm an attorney and that is a bizarre interpretation of the law.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.180.201.76 (talk) 22:58, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: In any event, that whole sentence is unsourced and is veering off on a peripheral topic not relevant to an article about Lloyd Nolan.  I took it out. TheBlinkster (talk) 04:48, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

message: I sincerely doubt that Nolan is known for Atlantic Adventure when that film is apparently so forgotten that it has no article on here, in contrast to the dozens of other films WITH articles.  Nolan played the father in A Hatful of Rain - he is way more famous for that than some obscure film from the 30s. Edited to add, 
I checked a couple references on Nolan and frankly this article is written in a pretty haphazard way. It needs fixing up.   I might do it at some point but if anyone else wants to take a crack at it in the meantime I think it could use some help. TheBlinkster (talk) 11:25, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Films he is famous for 

message: The link to The Caine Mutiny page is "Houk's classic  tale of military justice." but just above it references the play author Herman Wouk. Is that a typo that should be corrected from Houk to Wouk? 2601:640:C801:AC10:B73C:B6E9:18E9:AB6C (talk) 20:14, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Caine Mutiny Link
Talk:Marika Papagika

message: The page contents look exactly like this page http://www.violetta.demon.co.uk/papagika.html The Real Walrus 00:16, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: You may wish to cite this article "For the Record" which was printed in the Washington Post Magazine WP.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/08/13/AR2010081305087.html
Thanks, Rumjal. rumjal 05:20, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: For the Record
Talk:CZ 97B

message: This is a .45-caliber variant of the 75. I am proposing a merge back into that page. Koalorka (talk) 20:47, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 
Talk:Double rifle

message: I added sections and moved some stuff around. The page was one long paragraph but I don't know enough to contribute... Binarypower (talk) 22:01, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trying to wikify 

message: I know that Repeating Rifle isn't the best link for that particular sentence, but it is much better than "Shot Gun".  Sorry about my rather vulgar comment on that little change but I was thrown off by the seemingly thoughtless link.
If someone more knowledgable than I could change it from Repeating Rifle to something more appropriate it would be appreciated.  Fallenangei (talk) 20:15, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changed a Link from Shotgun to Repeating Rifle 

message: The article is more or less wikified, but it still requires citations. Given a few citations we can move it into start class -Deathsythe (talk) 19:52, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations 

message: I have undone the redirect by ansh666, whilst the article has massive issues, it is not only deserving independent of article status, but as far as I can see no process was followed.  Cavalryman V31 (talk) 10:53, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi. Please see WP:OR. While I do not disagree that this could have it's own article, it could also simply be expanded in the existing multiple barrel article. Regardless, whether its own article or an expansion of the other article, citations are needed, else it is original research. Normally, simply tagging it would suffice, hoping that work would be done on it, but this has been uncited for a decade. Onel5969 TT me 13:12, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect  

message: I have re-written the article from scratch.  Cavalryman V31 (talk) 10:34, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  New article
Talk:Dror light machine gun

message: The following is written in this article:  
"In 1946, the State of Israel.."  
I don't know what the guy that wrote that meant to say but obviously the state of Israel didn't exist in 1946 since it declared independence in 1948. Yochananz (talk) 17:35, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  An obvious mistake
Talk:FN CAL

message: There is a photo taken in 1978 by Joseph Elbert from the Miami Herald of Nicaraguan army troops loyal to Somosa fighting the Sandinistas, in which there is a soldier armed with a CAL; it can be identified because it resembles no other weapon from the period; the FNC was yet to appear. The rest of the troops are armed with M-1 Garands. The shot shows the men riding in an M-38 series Jeep, which itself is equipped with a pedestal mounted U.S. 57mm M-18A1 recoiless gun. Nicaragua is not a country generally acknowledged to have purchased the FN CAL.SASH155 (talk) 04:00, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo showing Nicaraguan soldier in 1978 armed with an FN CAL 

message: The article incorrectly states that the CAL uses 5.56 NATO.
This is not correct.  The CAL ceased production before 5.56 NATO came into existence.  The successor to the CAL was the FNC, which used the FN SS109 ball ammunition, derived from .223 Remington/5.56mm, but using a much longer, heavier bullet, in 1980 this was adopted as a NATO standard.
The CAL used .223 Remington (a round designed for the AR15 military rifle), usually identified as 5.56mm M193 for ball ammunition.  The practical difference is that the CAL used 1 in 12" rifling, which is insufficient to stabilise the much longer 5.56mm NATO projectile.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pavel Saccani (talk • contribs) 09:27, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cartridge/caliber 

message: Due to potential COI, using Talk to suggest addition to the article under ==Design Details==
Last sentence, after "A small number of FN CALs were sold to the civilian market in the US." propose adding the following:
This scarcity makes them valuable collector's items, with one being sold on GunBroker.com for $23,999.95 on 28 January 2024. LoVeloDogs (talk) 21:26, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed addition attesting to value
Talk:FN Model 1903

message: detail closeup in the image displays a faded arabic marking. how do you translate it?188.25.55.134 (talk) 18:50, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It translates to (police) with the same pronunciation, and the numbers are 7531  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Taiko 911 (talk • contribs) 12:01, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Detail in Photo 

message: model 1903 relates to the colt m1900. it would be nice if you could mention it. Paul188.25.55.134 (talk) 18:53, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  name ambiguous 

message: world.guns.ru (link mentioned in article) has much interesting info which would be nice in the article:
* "This pistol can be called as a forerunner of most semi-automatic pistols in the world, in one or another respect."
* "Significantly underpowered by modern standards"
* "Barrel is locked to the frame by several radial ribs."
It's a bit hidden in the mentioning of "blowback", but I think should be explicitly stated somewhere in the article that the barrel is fixed to the frame during operation, and that the breech is not locking in any way like they do in all modern handguns. Of course this is connected to the cartridge being considered as weak by modern standards.
--BjKa (talk) 08:40, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  more detail
Talk:FX-05 Xiuhcoatl

message: Footnote 4 is to a blog and appears to be broken. Surv1v4l1st (Talk|Contribs) 00:37, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Footnote 4 

message: http://www.tagesschau.de/inland/heckler-koch-waffendeal102.html (German only)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.61.116.104 (talk) 03:00, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: yeah Mexico paid 22 million pesos for technology transfer. the documents have been in the press, so the information that the project was aborted before any technology could be sold is wrong. --2.240.7.126 (talk) 23:23, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lawsuit against HK in Germany on basis of illegal export to Mexico 
Talk:Firing pin

message: Per merriam webster (https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ordinance) ordinance (with an "i") is defined as authoritative order or degree.  While ordnance (without an "i") is defined as military supplies including weapons, ammunition, combat vehicles, and maintenance tools and equipment (https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ordnance).  What needs to be done to have my change reverted back to accept "ordnance" without an "i"?  Thank you. Hillarin (talk) 03:41, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ordinance vs. Ordnance
Template talk:CNHI

message: This template was rendering poorly on small monitors, because of the included line breaks. I used  to prevent the individual wikilinks from being broken up by word-wrapping, and removed the line breaks. I imagine there might be a more efficient way to do this, though.  -Tobogganoggin talk 20:24, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I was the one who originally set it up with the hard breaks. The reasoning being, first, that I didn't like to see individual names breaking in the middle -- I like how you've solved that -- and second, that I didn't like the unbalanced look of having bullets separating a name from a line break (i.e., I think stylistically the line break should take the place of the bullet -- it's either one or the other). Given the presence of alternate display setups, e.g. small monitors, I don't think there's any easy way to solve my second problem, though, so this seems to be as good as it will get. ``` W i k i W i s t a h W a s s a p 22:45, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Line breaks 

message: The COVID-19 pandemic and its drastic effect on the newspaper business has caused CNHI to reduce the preint frequency of almost all of its daily newspapers. Some have even been reduced in two steps from daily to weekly. Therefore, we need to assess how we will rename the category headings in this template. I am currently going through all CNHI papers (as shown on List of newspapers published by CNHI) on a periodic basis to change the print frequencies or to indicate papers that have closed or merged with other newspapers. It's a big task, as the parent company is in serious trouble and making changes in virtually all of its properties. Realkyhick (talk) 06:45, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd view this as analogous to a WP article on a shop or restaurant that has closed because of COVID-19 -- would the lede say "is" or "was"? I think it all depends on the messaging accompanying the changes. If the company is pitching this as a temporary change, I'd say note the changes in the article but leave them in the template. If (or when) the company announces that these changes are permanent, only then delete them from the template. Just my suggestion. ``` t b w i l l i e ` $1.25 ` 21:46, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  No more CNHI dailies?
Talk:An Airman's Letter to His Mother

message: The article has a paragraph starting On this day Winston Churchill announced, in his "This was their finest hour" speech to the House of Commons.... But on which day? The only dates mentioned up to that point in the article are the date when Rosewarne died, 30 May and the date when the letter was published in The Times and that is only given as June 1940. Was the letter published on the same day that Churchill made that speech (18 June 1940)? If it was then that's a good coincidence, if it wasn't then that paragraph should be removed -- SteveCrook (talk) 02:51, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, the letter was published on 18 June 1940. But is the reference to Churchill's speech really relevant? The speech is about the start of the Battle of Britain. Rosewarne, and most British bomber crews, didn't take much of a part in that battle -- SteveCrook (talk) 02:55, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  On this day 
Talk:Gibraltar/Archive 5

message: There were rumors a few years ago about a possible stock exchange in Gibraltar, and there is a page in Wikipedia about it (GibEX). Did it materialize in the end? W2ch00 15:50, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Theres been speculation about it for a number of years, however the building has gone up next to the Natwest Bank and its going to open soon. --Gibnews 21:50, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[ Gibraltar Stock Exchange ]]

message: Apart from some members of the Royal Gibraltar Regiment serving, and geting medals for bravery in Afghanistan I'm puzzled what its got to do with us ...
--Gibnews 19:06, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Afghanistan ?

message: Please do not threaten me.  
Can I remind you of your comment:
:I would agree that the WikiProject Spain template is inappropriate for the main Gibraltar article, because Gibraltar isn't part of Spain, but Gibraltar's history plainly does come under the WikiProject's scope. Please put nationalism to one side - you can hardly argue that Gibraltarian history has nothing to do with Spain. -- ChrisO 13:43 10 February 2007 (UTC) 
What are we going to have next, Spanish flags on articles about South America, and Florida because at one time Spain occupied those lands?
The Gibraltar pages are about GIBRALTAR not Spain. But if we have to debate this lets do so, in the meantime, no provocation, and please no threats.
--Gibnews 20:55, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: ChrisO
Talk:Heckler & Koch MG4

message: I think it would be worthwhile to indicate that the HK MG4 fires from an open bolt. Gruppe B (talk) 04:03, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Open bolt? 

message: I have deleted a couple of citations to HKPRO.com. It is not a reliable source for Wikipedia articles because its articles are anonymously posted and there's no discernible editorial review process. See WP:V for general rules, and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Firearms#HKPRO/ hkpro.com for a specific discussion of this source.  Rezin (talk) 00:17, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  HKPRO 

message: This article's one citation is a dead link, and the others are just for saying 'country A uses X amount of MG4s'
it's still a stub imo. CR055H41RZ (talk) 12:54, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  No references
Talk:High Standard Model 10

message: In the mid 1960s, Crouch sold his design to the High Standard Manufacturing Company, who used their Flite King shotgun as the basis for the first model, the 10A. The Flite King was modified by replacing the stock, relocating the trigger assembly, and fitting a three-piece plastic shell around the receiver and first half of the barrel.
This section is wrong, given that the High Standard Flite King was a series of pump-action shotguns, and not semi-automatics, like the Model 10. 77.110.1.75 (talk) 14:49, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flite King 

message: someone could add the abbreviation "HS10" somewhere cause you can't find it on search that way, you have to search the whole name (high standard model 10) when at the time i only knew it as HS10 Erinalana (talk) 15:23, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  HS10