lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Glass-reinforced plastic

message: It would be helpful to know the mechanical principles of GRPs. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.47.161.206 (talk • contribs) .
:Done! Read it and change as you see fit.
:Atlant 16:25, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  GRP 

message: Do not merge: GRPs are only one kind of FRP, thus FRP should remain at least as a sort of disambiguation article.--Vierzehn (talk) 19:50, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There are further recent comments on talk:glass reinforced plastic.--Vierzehn (talk) 18:27, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

text: GRP is specific to fiberglass. FRP could be any fiber such as carbon-fiber, cotton-fiber, or even hemp. BingoDingo (talk) 04:00, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

text: I don't know about this merge. If anything, wouldn't glass reinforced plastics be a sub-category of fiber-reinforced plastics?Elliott Shultz (talk) 19:50, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That is what I wanted to express. I have removed the merge-tag. It would be nice, if both articles would be improved. However, merging would not improve them, especially if the merge would be performed in the suggested direction.--Vierzehn (talk) 09:25, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Absolutely. I'm going to snuffle around these (and a few other related) to see if they can't be filled out and cross-referenced more effectively. If you've got any suggestions as to what angle to attack this, let me know!Elliott Shultz (talk) 20:45, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging "[[fibre-reinforced plastic]]" into "[[glass-reinforced plastic]]"?

message: The description is pretty good, but it leaves out one vital step. The mold must have a releasing agent (wax, oil, etc.) so the cured GRP can be removed from the mold. BingoDingo (talk) 03:56, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Layup Process 

message: Article suggests polyester is the most common type of plastic resin used, which certainly looking at supplierfs of GRP-related materials does seem to be true, but as the article on polyester tells us, "polyester" refers to a family of plastics, not a specific one.  Would be useful to say which one -- I'd guess we're talking polyethylene terephthalate, but would like to be able to be sure. 212.159.69.4 (talk) 01:28, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Most likely you are right, but really a reference should be found to support that educated guess. Wizard191 (talk) 14:39, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Polyester? 

message: Any thoughts? My view is that polymer is the correct term, plastic is a "popular" and inaccurate term in this context...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chr blom (talk • contribs) 09:36, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Read polymer and plastic. Wizard191 (talk) 18:03, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Polymers vs Plastics 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Fiberglass which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 13:30, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Baileys Harbor, Wisconsin

message: Baileys Harbor was named after Capt. Bailey, who was one of the earliest visitors and the  "first" settler in the town.  However, there is no apostrophy in the name.  
Peter Jacobs, Town Supervisor, Baileys Harbor Wisconsin--209.62.168.106 21:51, 16 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  No ' 

message: I just made an edit to the Cana Island page.  The previously stated size of the island (at over 8 square miles) seemed gargantuanly wrong, given the photographs I have seen of the island.  I used Google Maps to estimate it, and from what I saw, Cana Island was just under 750 feet wide from West-East, which was its largest dimension for area, which would mean that it is less than .02 miles.  If there are any knowledgeable locals who can provide more accurate information, please be my guest and make a correction.  Please leave a message on my talk page if you need any technical help with that.  QuakerIlK (talk) 15:32, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Cana Island]] size correction
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Languages

message: I'd love to do an article on Digital extinction of language, but unfortunately I'm over-extended and about to be away anyway. This is a topic that is definitely receiving attention. My early take on it is that it has two senses: minority languages that don't have a presence on the web, but are not immediately threatened otherwise; i.e., they are spoken/written, and the "extinction" refers only to lack of a digital presence. There is also another sense, I think, in which even if the language is relatively okay now, pressure from competing languages which do have a web presence (even other minority languages, even if smaller/more threatened) will eventually cause pressure on the ones that don't, and could contribute to their actual extinction, not just from the web. There are good articles from plenty of reliable sources.
* 
Hopefully, someone will take this up. I have the (red-linked) title watchlisted; if you end up choosing a different title, please ping me to its talk page. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 20:09, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Digital extinction of language 

message: There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Chinese language and varieties in the United States#Requested move 31 March 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 14:14, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move at [[Talk:Chinese language and varieties in the United States#Requested move 31 March 2024]] 

message: I need a private-use language tag for the Anatolian family of languages to use in Template:lang. However, I am having trouble coming up with something that fits the format used for these tags. Some help would be appreciated. Antiquistik (talk) 17:31, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help required to create private-use language tag for Anatolian languages at [[Template talk:Lang#Code for Anatolian languages]] 

message: I seem to have waded into a minefield by restoring six example sentences at Franglais.  They were deleted last year and again after I restored them as "unsourced" and "original research".  I don't think they're research at all, and don't require sources as simple examples of something that's just been defined and cited to reliable sources.  But another editor is equally certain that they are, and do.  What we need now is other editors to weigh in and give opinions as to whether usage examples need to be cited to anything, or constitute "original research".  This seemed like a reasonable place to ask.  P Aculeius (talk) 23:31, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content dispute over usage examples at [[talk:Franglais]] 

message: There's currently a discussion to establish consensus on aspects including layout and sourcing on the Hokkien article. Input from folks would be appreciated. Remsense诉 21:47, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Hokkien]] article and infobox 

message: Please join the work on the content of Wikipedia:Stress marks in East Slavic words. - Altenmann >talk 12:59, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stress marks in East Slavic words
Talk:Air India Flight 182

message: More appropriate title as used in WP:RS sources is "1985 Air India Bombing: AI flight 182".
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-66909820 RogerYg (talk) 06:39, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change name or Split Article to "1985 Air India Bombings" 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Not moved. Per consensus, WP:AVTITLE is applicable. – robertsky (talk) 15:29, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Air India Flight 182 → ? – Current page Title is misleading & does not mention the main issue of the Bombing. 
This RFC is about: Should the name of this Wiki page be changed to include "bombing" either as "1985 Air India Bombing: AI flight 182" or "Air India Flight 182 bombing RogerYg (talk) 07:10, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfC about Changing page name 

message: The current lead sentence violated the lead sentence guidelines as per WP:AVINAME Style guidelines https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Aviation/Style_guide/Naming
* Where an aviation incident article does not use a common name or descriptive name as a title, and instead begins with the opening sentence: Airline Flight XYZ...., it should go on to immediately describe the notability of the incident in as few as words as possible. For this reason, it is not necessary in the opening line to clarify that the flight number may still be in use, or where it is normally scheduled to fly - this is because the normal flight or flight number is not the subject of the article. For example:
# Correct: Madeup Airline Flight 123 was a passenger flight from Somewhere to Somewhere Else, that on such and such a day, failed/crashed/blew up/was hijacked. 
# Incorrect: Madeup Airline Flight 123 is a regularly scheduled passenger flight from Somewhere to Somewhere Else. On such and such a day, the aircraft used on this flight failed/crashed/blew up/was hijacked. 
The lead sentence of this page followed INCORRECT guidelines and needs to be updated to CORRECT guidelines. RogerYg (talk) 03:09, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead sentence as per  WP:AVINAME
Talk:December 22

message: --mav 00:59, 1 Mar 2004 (UTC)

message: Moved birth from article:
*1980 - Phil Johnson, philanthropist, musician 
Couldn't verify. Lupo 12:07, 20 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Phil Johnson

message: Removed Brett Farve entry - considering the global importance of the other events listed, his achievement doesn't seem as appropriate. --mtz206 00:23, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC)
:Evidently this event has resurfaced and it still remains non-notable.  -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 20:37, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Brett Favre

message: I'm going to go ahead and put brackets around the years to wikify them.--Farquaadhnchmn 15:42, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Years

message: Kiwipete, In my edit summary, "random aviation incident" refers to the Korean Air Cargo Flight 8509. Anyways, here's why my inclusion of Falcon 9 flight 20 is warranted:
* Successful return and vertical landing of a rocket's first stage has never been achieved before.
* This is the first ever practical reuse of a rocket. The Space Shuttle has its spacecraft reusable, but refurbishing it cost more than building a new one outright.
* It does reduce the cost of spaceflight by a factor of two, i.e. not a fluke.
- CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 05:47, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think this meets either WP:NOTABILITY or WP:DOYSTYLE - there is no link to a wiki article specifically about this event. As you noted in your earlier edit, it is mentioned in 2015 in spaceflight, and I think that is the appropriate place for it. Thanks, Kiwipete (talk) 10:05, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: What the hell? I literally provided a link to the article on top called Falcon 9 flight 20. You're just being disruptive at this point. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 10:06, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:BRD]]
Talk:Jan O. Karlsson

message: Please provide sources for all quotes and info on this article.TheRingess 16:38, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Cite Sources
Talk:Troyes

message: "Troyes is also the home of the world-champion chocolate maker, Pascal Caffet. His creations have won a series of awards, which can be found on his website, http://www.pascal-caffet.com/. Unfortunately, this website is currently only in French."
* Why "unfortunately"? This statement is quite POV.
- 190.161.124.33 19:31, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Unfortunately" 

message: The red dot on the France map is not quite at its place. It should be at the center of Aube département. No very big deal, but still...Patch051 (talk) 18:43, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map position 

message: How did Troyes deal with its indigent population in 1573? Jagdfeld (talk) 17:17, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: 1573

message: Why not mention the "death cloud of Troyes" which killed several people in summer 1936? 217.255.77.232 (talk) 10:21, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I wish to know more about this fact! 185.183.227.131 (talk) 17:43, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death cloud of Troyes 
Talk:John Brunner (author)

message: I miss some stuff about his music, painting, organising festivals and member of the demilitarisation movement. Horst Emscher (talk) 21:29, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  more facettes of JB
Talk:Quebec comics

message: I moved this article from Bande dessinée of Quebec to Quebec comic strips because the "comic strip" is what users of Wikipedia will be typing in the search field.  There is no need for a French title if the English translation is adequate.Indefatigable 18:01, 22 Dec 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Reason for move

message: These new sections are taken from the Quebec comic strips article in the French Wikipedia :fr:Bande dessinée québécoise.
I'm not finished with this ! --BeauJoualMailbox 01:26, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding of new sections
Talk:Multiple cropping

message: This is similar to, and may be synonymous with, succession planting. I changed the original definition here, which stated that multiple cropping specifically refers to successive plantings, not not simultaneous. It seems, from looking online for definitions, that "multiple cropping" is a looser term, simply referring to growing more than one crop in the same place during the same season. That fits with the understanding I've had, though I haven't seen the term used much. "Succession planting" is widely used. It usually appears in literature for home/small-scale farm vegetable production. Tsavage 18:15, 22 Dec 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This page, nurse crop & polyculture are all very short and would benefit from being merged into each other or other relevant pages. I'm not well versed in searching either article merging or searching for the guidelines for specifics of wikipedia editing. Houdinipeter (talk) 18:33, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi  if you want to propose a merge of these pages, there is a useful information page here, stating why and how to propose a merger. There's also a WikiProject - WikiProject Merge that could be a useful place to find out more information or ask questions if you need more help. Basically, to propose a merger, you follow the instructions here. Alternatively, you could enable Twinkle on your Wikipedia account by clicking the Twinkle tick box on this page, then clicking save at the bottom. You can then go to the page you want to merge, click on the TW button on the right of the bar at the top of the article, clicking on the Tag option, scrolling down to the Merging section, choosing the correct template that you want and filling in the boxes that appear. This is quite complicated, so if you want some help proposing this merger, just ask on this talk page with which pages you think should be merged and why you think they should be merged, add a  template and some other kind editor will do this process for you if you so want. If you need any other help, or want to ask a question, just ask at my talk page or visit the Teahouse. Hopefully this helped, thank you!  Seagull123  Φ  20:52, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Page Length and Merging Suggestion

message: what are the reason of multiple crop farming konsa chapter 2409:4043:701:2B2B:0:0:28A3:88A5 (talk) 13:31, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Social science
Talk:Child marriage

message: A lot of quran only ( 100% quranist or just muslim who are rejecting some hadith will oppose you that the 65:4 didnt explicitly talk about child 
so they will tell you that the quran is actually talking about mature women who didnt menstruate yet and will reject all the tafsir( and even some hadith)
since they are just  regular "human" that can make mistakes .
But I have found a verse to prove child marriage DIRECTLY :
23. Forbidden for you are your mothers, your daughters, your sisters, your paternal aunts, your maternal aunts, your brother's daughters, your sister's daughters, your foster-mothers who nursed you, your sisters through nursing, your wives' mothers, and your stepdaughters in your guardianship—born of wives you have gone into—but if you have not gone into them, there is no blame on you. And the wives of your genetic sons, and marrying two sisters simultaneously. Except what is past. God is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful. 
so here in this verse the quran CLEARLY makes hallal  to marry your "stepdaughter which you have in charge "
You wouldnt have here in charge if she was a mature women.
I think muslims critics should add this verse to their arsenal even muslim quran only or who are rejecting all the bad hadith cant respond to that.
This is the first time I use wiki I am not sure If I this is the right place and the right manner to provide you this proof
But please think about  adding  this verse to this very good article that made me questioning my faith.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:E0A:3E9:A260:393F:4B75:9279:4294 (talk) 12:21, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "A additionnal verse that prove child marriage that  is missing in this article" 

message: The section on bride kidnapping doesn't demonstrate its relevance to this page. A kidnapped bride could be young or old, but nothing is said about that. It needs a source connecting it to child marriage or it should be removed. Zerotalk 10:26, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  bride kidnapping 

message: I get it. You guys clearly don’t want people to know about other sources, but what Mordechai A. Friedman said in his book. I can’t say he is wrong, but most sources that I read on Jewish marriage contradict what he said. The sources I’ve read said most married at teen years or early to mid or mid or mid to late or early to late. None said before 15. Some point out that Palestinian Jewish women typically  married in mid to late teen years while those in Babylon married earlier. Several sources said Palestinian Jewish women married 12-18. 2601:406:5101:F500:8889:EF3D:51CD:601B (talk) 16:30, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fixing an Error
Talk:Systems thinking

message: What can systems thinking be contrasted with? Is it linear thinking, sub optimization, or something else? Thanks! --Lbeaumont (talk) 13:43, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @Lbeaumont interesting question. out of the ones you listed, I think linear thinking. 98.167.75.109 (talk) 17:12, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @98.167.75.109 as well as Dualistic Thinking ie. binary logic 98.167.75.109 (talk) 17:13, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contrasted with... 

message: The Systems Engineering article links to here. The article should really stay because systems engineering is a very important part of engineering Starlighsky (talk) 22:52, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Systems Engineering links to here, Article should really stay
Talk:Lac repressor

message: Edited first sentence.  LacI is not an enzyme - it does not catalyze any chemical reaction.  
This could probably use a bit of work in general (I'll see if I can put something together little by little).  It seems somewhat vague for something which is the one of the first known examples of one of the fundamental concepts in biochemistry.  The search for the lac crystal structure lasted for decades.  I see the lac operon has a bit more detail.  This article should probably not describe how the operon as a whole works, but should probably focus on the repressor itself, its structure, and how it actually works.  --Rich0 02:29, Apr 25, 2005 (UTC)
Second paragraph of the Function heading is a bit misleading. The repressor protein is always produced, but doesn't always bind to the operator.  There are times when the repressor dissociates from the operator through sheer chance, through protein degradation, and other factors.  This leads to a small amount of the operon's genes being coded and present in the cell.  This small amount then facilitates uptake and digestion of lactose, which then results in the positive feedback.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.250.20.44 (talk) 05:34, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not an enzyme 

message: See here for discussion.Alun 05:12, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: ''lac'' operon merger

message: This sentence is (in my opinion) not right:
"This DNA binding causes the specific affinity of RNA polymerase for the promoter sequence to increase sufficiently that it cannot escape the promoter region and enter elongation, and so prevents transcription of the mRNA coding for the Lac proteins.[2]"
It never occurs in the linked paper, maybe this sentence was meant:
"When the inducer is present, the repressor binds less efficiently to the operator, which allows RNA polymerase to recognize its promoter and transcribe the genes necessary for lactose utilization."
In my understanding: 
The lac repressor binds to the promotor-region, when it gets inactivated it dissociates and the RNA polymerase can bind (and enter elongation).
But because i am still a student i don't want to edit this article, maybe someone, who knows more about this (and has the right sources) could do that.
Thx
HelgaBio (talk) 11:59, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Function 

message: Is it correct that this domains binds allolactose? I here have notes, from some textbook, where the COOH terminus binds allolactose. This may be
wrong, but perhaps the information on wikipedia is wrong too? Either way I think we should add more references there, simply to confirm it. 2A02:8388:1602:6D80:A584:D1E1:2690:10E6 (talk) 12:39, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regulatory domain