lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:St. Augustine Monster

message: Very nice scholarly page, but yeah OK I think it could be more usefully entitled "St Augustine Carcass" or similar. Better than a merge.
Tullimonstrum 16:47, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: If it was an octopus or a squid, the giant bird-beak would identify it. For such a huge invertebrae, the beak should be one meter (yard) large! No beak, no monster, so it was most possibly a rotten whale. 195.70.48.242 08:48, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There were initial reports of a "mouth". I will add a quote as I work through the article. Mgiganteus1 11:19, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bites your head off 

message: Why is this catagorized as paranormal?  This is not pseudoscience like astrology or creationism.  This is a carcass that washed up on the beach, nothing "paranormal" about it. L0b0t 12:39, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmmmm, I'd agree with you. Removed it for now. Someone should start WikiProject:Cryptozoology. Mgiganteus1 12:59, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: For the moment, Cryptozoology is covered by WikiProject Paranormal. --InShaneee 18:33, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

text: Paranormal is a very broad term which refers to a variety of physical and psychical phenomenon, including cryptozoology.  It's not really a synonym for supernatural.  A paranormal topic is one which cannot be explained by science at the present but may be explained in the future. Zagalejo 02:40, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paranormal?? 

message: Should the St. Augustine Monster have an animal infobox.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zachbarbo (talk • contribs) 18:49, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox 

message: , I removed :Giant octopus, :Seven-arm octopus and :Lusca from the See also section in 2018 because I thought they were unrelated to what turned out to be a decomposed whale carcass. Although it was initially thought to be an octopus, these articles don't have any information that's relevant to the St. Augustine "Monster". –dlthewave ☎ 16:39, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: , interest in this carcass stems almost entirely from the fact that it was believed by many, for more than a century, to be the remains of a gigantic octopus. It think it makes sense to direct readers to the actual largest known octopus species (seven-arm octopus and Enteroctopus). As for the folkloric Lusca, it is a supposed giant octopus that has often been linked to the St. Augustine Monster due to geographic proximity (though this is not discussed in the article at present). mgiganteus1 (talk) 17:03, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Octopi in See also
Talk:Stade Brestois 29

message: Is there any explanation of why they are called "29"?
:29 is the code of the département of Finistère, in which Brest is located. 98.209.116.7 (talk) 04:22, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stade Brestois "29" 

message: The redirect 2023–24 Stade Brestois 29 season has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Dl.thinker (talk) 10:46, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:2023–24 Stade Brestois 29 season]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Stade de Reims

message: The redirect 2023–24 Stade de Reims season has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Dl.thinker (talk) 13:19, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:2023–24 Stade de Reims season]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Tampere United

message: Probably sources there to get further into the club's 2010–2011 issues. — LlywelynII 10:28, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Dan Tan]]
Talk:Toulouse FC

message: The actual TFC club was founded in 1970. The former TFC, founded in 1937, was disbanded in 1967 (merge with the Red Star). Forget the club claiming (same name = same club...) and check history books about that topic... 85.69.175.172 (talk) 14:43, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  1937? 

message: Hi Toulouse fc was wondering to ask how if I wanted to join the team? 197.184.183.40 (talk) 17:42, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'm Jonathan 

message: "The city was left without a big side in 1967 when Toulouse FC sold its players and place in the French top flight to Paris outfit Red Star, but three years later a new club, Union Sportive Toulouse, rose from the ashes" - this suggests that the club was founded in 1970, and the name history section matches that.  So where does the formation date of 1937 come from......? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:43, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date confusion 

message: The redirect 2023–24 Toulouse FC season has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Dl.thinker (talk) 10:48, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:2023–24 Toulouse FC season]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:It Takes a Family

message: I didn't put an NPOV template on the article because it appears there is a good-faith effort at NPOV. However, it is a distinctly non-NPOV result when one summarizes each viewpoint in a single sentence, then gives a long block quote to a notable favorable opinion. I expect that given Santorum's own notability, there is probably a more high-profile review that could be cited for the other side. Also, with or without such a review, the Dobson quote seems unnecessarily long; more importantly, on second reading, I see that it doesn't address the book at all. I'm going to replace it with a summary indicating Dobson's personal endorsement of Santorum in connection with the book; after all, Dobson's influence is such that the action of endorsing is itself notable. Lawikitejana 21:56, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Update: Used two positive reviews and two negative reviews, all from major sources — tried to choose representative and well-written critiques for both sides and keep the length somewhat balanced. Lawikitejana 04:23, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question the approach to citing criticism 

message: This is a non-fiction work, yet it is labeled as a "novel" in the sidebar.  Does "novel" mean something other than the obvious in the context of "Media Type", the category in the sidebar under which this book is classified as a novel?  LeoO3 20:48, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Novel? 
Talk:UN Käerjéng 97

message: Must be incorrect as no mention is made of the second qualifying round that they supposedly played in  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.60.238.38 (talk) 00:02, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: European record
Talk:Valenciennes FC

message: The logo clearly shows the letters AFC, yet there is no mention of that elsewhere in the article, so why does the logo show AFC and the article say FC everywhere? - MTC 15:39, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's "VAFC", "VA" being a common local abbreviation for Valenciennes. --171.16.4.4 15:27, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  FC or AFC? 

message: The club have a new logo. --Gluggy (talk) 13:22, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Logo
Talk:Star Wars Databank

message: Ok, so I did a bit of fixing up to the article, hope more stuff will come to it :) Stealth (talk) 01:16, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fixed Up 

message: I know we can use the source, as it is an official, reliable source, but do folk from Lucasfilm write the entries, or do fans? That wasn't really addressed above - you know, with citable refeences that back up the statements. As I see it, this is what we need cites for:
# Who the heck is Pablo Hidalgo, and does he write the majority of the entries? Cite that, please.
# If he does, why was given this massive task? Cite that, too.
# Do fans actually contribute to the entries? Cite.
# It was mentioned that they go through a "rigorous" fact-checking exercise.  Please provide references that note that process, please. I think we are all familiar with crap being shoved out the door and onto the store shelves with numerous bugs/plot holes. or just plain wrong stuff in it. Therefore, some idea of the process is helpful.
# Canon isn't a consideration to Wikipedia. We add anything, so long as it can be solidly, reliably cited. Without citations, info cannot remain. - Arcayne (cast a spell) 09:35, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Okay, who writes the Databank entries?
Talk:Barak 1

message: Barak 1 and Barak 8 are different systems. I suggest splitting the article. Flayer (talk) 19:09, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Some one has splitted into 2 different articles, since. --Wisdood (talk) 14:06, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Splitting the article
Talk:Honbasho

message: In two places page says pairings are "determined by win-loss records." I would like to know in what way. --ChrisMiddleton (talk) 02:52, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: All it means is basically those who are doing well and challenging for the championship will be matched against each other to create excitement and help determine who wins. Also those who are aiming just to get their majority of wins will sometimes be paired so only one will get it and go up the ranks next time and the other will go down. I'll see what sources I can find and add something to the article.-- Pawnkingthree (talk) 13:13, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: @Pawnkingthree Could you find some sources for this? I also noticed it while watching ozumo, but I cannot find a source. Emilio.Berti (talk) 10:43, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Emilio.Berti Just a quick note to say I've seen this and will look for a source. Pawnkingthree (talk) 13:19, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  How does "win-loss" matching work? 

message: Why does the paragraph
:A bye is only possible if a wrestler has withdrawn due to injury from a scheduled bout; the result is that his opponent wins by forfeit. If a withdrawal^[clarification needed] results in an odd number of wrestlers in one division, the schedule is filled in by pairing a lower-ranked wrestler against a higher-ranked wrestler from the next-lower division.
claim that clarification is needed?  It seems clear to me.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Will Mengarini (talk • contribs) 14:33, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: They were asking in what circumstances a wrestler can withdraw without penalty. There is no such thing as a withdrawal always results in a loss, so I've re-written it to make that clear.-- Pawnkingthree (talk) 20:48, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bye clarification needed?
Talk:List of anti-tank missiles

message: Hi, can anyone please confirm the criteria for inclusion in this list? Is it by country of "origin" (where the missile was developed/created), by "manufature" or by "use"? The article itself says nothing about this.  Thanks & regards, DPdH (talk) 03:52, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Focus of this list: by Country of "Origin"? 
Talk:IWGP Junior Heavyweight Championship

message: I know that wikipedia is about being official and everything, but shouldn't the title changes that occured in WCW be removed from the list of champions with maybe a little note of the unofficial, unauthorized booking that the title received while in WCW?  TonyFreakinAlmeida 21:38, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title changes in WCW
Talk:Nulka

message: The referenced Mk 47 Nulka Launcher seems to be missing a digit or a wrong number?  USN launching systems are usually in the two-digits, (I.E. NSSMS GMLS Mk 29, SRBOC Mk 36 DLS, VLS Mk 41/48, RAM GMLS Mk 49, SLQ-49 Rubber Duck DLS Mk 50, or Nulka Mk 53 DLS), whereas individual launcher units (part of a system) are in the low three-digits, (I.E. NSSMS GML Mk 132, SRBOC Mk 137, RAM GML Mk 144).  [Sometimes, the designations of systems, subsystems and major units/components are found to be used interchangeably in some casual conversations or online webpages].  I believe that when Nulka is integrated into SRBOC Mk 36 DLS, the system becomes DLS Mk 53, but the launcher retains Mk 137 designation with a new modification (Mod) number.  Lockheed Martin's 2007 online pdf data sheet (PIRA#MAN200612001) shows a Mk 137 Mod 7 launcher as part of Nulka DLS Mk 53 Mod 1.  Not sure if there is any stand-alone version of Nulka that does not piggy-back the six-tube SRBOC Mk 137 launcher.
144.183.224.2 (talk) 23:21, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mark Four Seven 

message: Up to date now, really how many USN ships (alone) have Nulka?  I recall just 1 USNR Spruance class destroyer getting it temporarily installed, and then removed, as a modification to support more realistic at-sea testing in later 1990's, and that operational testing and evaluation (OT&E) could not determine that the system was effective enough for the money.  And then not much scuttlebutt about Nulka.144.183.224.2 (talk) 23:38, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some, 100 - - - or none (0)? 

message: The article currently reads that the TV show was erroneous in its depiction of the Nulka being deployed. It seemed to me to mimic what is seen in BAE's own  video.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:304:4497:5020:43D:E77:113B:35F (talk) 23:30, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Last Ship depiction of Nulka 

message: If Americans knew what "ponce" meant in British slang (and there's more than one meaning), I think they'd have chosen a different name: USS Gayboy, USS Pimp, USS Scrounger  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.146.53.41 (talk) 04:44, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  USS Ponce
Talk:Dobu Island

message: Ruth Benedict's book Patterns of Culture Chapter 5 describes the society of Dobu -- society revolves around getting the better of other people by cheating, poisoning, or practicing sorcery on them while worrying oneself sick over the virtual certainty that others are getting the better of oneself by cheating, poisoning, or practicing sorcery on oneself. Benedict evidently did not study them at first hand -- can someone cite Benedict's primary source?
:Not sure about that author's source, but try this ethnography:
::Fortune, R. (1963). Sorcerers of Dobu: the social anthropology of the Dobu Islanders of the Western Pacific. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
:I haven't seen it myself, but it's cited in a book I'm reading that has a passage on Dobuan culure, which sounds very interesting. 18:36, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Bofors STRIX

message: Why is it named Strix?  TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura 22:04, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: It's an Owl, likely by association with them precisely locating and silently striking their prey even at night. Arno, 87.139.7.40 (talk) 13:39, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's in a name?
Talk:Fujiko Fujio

message: Oy, but the crediting of the works is a muddle, with many joint works (or at least officially credited under the join penname) being listed under one or the other only, including Doraemon. Any help sorting out the lists appreciated. —Quasirandom (talk) 16:51, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Works 

message: For whatever reason, this page has been vandalized on numerous occasions. Since Fujimoto and Abiko are not politically controversial figures in the least, it would be respectful to refrain from trashing the page repeatedly, especially as Fujimoto is deceased and by all accounts was a good family man.
I've rewritten the entire page with material from the Japanese Wikipedia page as a starting point for expansion and sensible editing. Apparently it's still going to get vandalized with meaningless Cantopop references. Just quit. Jun Kayama  00:05, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undoing Vandalism 

message: As Jun Kayama mentioned, this page has been vandalised many times in the past and is still affected by the same today, so my suggestion to prevent this from happening any more is to protect or semi-protect the article if possible. Let me know if this is a feasible solution, thank you. VP Gerudo (talk) 09:39, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  A suggestion to prevent further vandalism.
Talk:Anna Nardini

message: Why does the Anna Nardini article has to disappear? There's no need to make it disappear. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 129.175.172.72 (talk • contribs) 09:45, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It did not "disappear," it was merged and redirected to List of Gilmore Girls characters. Shannernanner 09:48, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Chico Freeman

message: Does anyone know if Chico is his given name or a nickname arising from being the son of Von Freeman? Cheers! --Technopat (talk) 07:43, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Given name or nickname? 

message: Support split - Discography section takes up close to one third of the page and should be split to a new article entitled Chico Freeman discography. --Jax 0677 (talk) 18:44, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chico Freeman discography 
Talk:Miwa Nishikawa

message: Your article is very comprehensive and covers her in great detail. It made me want to watch her films. As for my edits I took out a few words here and there but really only had an issue with your use of the word blockbuster. It seemed to promotional to me so I took both instances out and reworked the second one to make the sentence flow better. Overall it was very well done but maybe adding a table of her awards would help to prove her credibility/notability. Good luck! Journoloaf (talk) 15:24, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review 
Talk:Miyabe Keijun

message: After readin the Japanese article for this page, I've come to conclude that these articles are about the same person, just using separate names. Because this is the name used in the Japanese article, I think it should be used here, as well. Douggers (talk) 03:13, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I performed the merger after I realized that the name has two readings. I went with the reading given in the jawiki article. Douggers (talk) 14:34, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Tennessee Volunteers football

message: It would be appropriate to at least mention Tennessee's program as the origin of the Fulmer Cup. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.132.221.96 (talk) 20:16, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fulmer Cup 

message: I have recently noticed this article has been semi-protected, but for some unknown reason.
There has been no public discussion of a request to do such protections. However, due to the current events amongst the debacle of the head coach replacement scandal. This isn’t a nationwide issue, it’s an issue of the state of Tennessee, predominantly the eastern division. Please, if you request article protection, create a new discussion to explain why you did. Averagetennesseejoe (talk) 05:14, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protection of article 

message: This article is currently 93.940 kB.
:WP:TOOBIG gives:
> 100 kB	Almost certainly should be divided
> 60 kB	Probably should be divided (although the scope of a topic can sometimes justify the added reading material)
Options include addressing non-standard sections and those with sourcing issues. UW Dawgs (talk) 22:13, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP:TOOBIG 

message: Bill Cowher as coach? 184.20.220.172 (talk) 22:11, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bill Cowher as coach
Talk:Laser cannon

message: I think I agree with your merge proposal because I'd rather this content be clearly within a "Star wars" page. I don't know much about how fictional pages are handled in wikipedia, personally I'd be more comfortable knowing the title itself reflected the fact that the page is fictional material.  Madeleine 13:45, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 
Category talk:American Buddhists

message: Suze Orman is listed here as an American Buddhist.  Can anyone cite a source for her being Buddhist?  If so, the citation should be a part of the biography on her Wikipedia page. --Enkido 22:17, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

message: His wikipedia biography says that he was ordained as a buddist monk.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonard_cohen  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.196.236.87 (talk) 06:24, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Leonard Cohen is a Buddhist and should be on this page.
Talk:List of melee weapons in the Star Wars universe

message: Rewrote most of the article, made it uniform; now, I'm proposing that we move this to List of Star Wars melee weapons or List of weapons in the Star Wars universe or such, whichever agrees with naming convention. I'm thinking of List of melee weapons in the Star Wars universe; see articles such as List of Combine non-combat technology in Half-Life 2. Also, I'm not sure where the book citations could be referenced; I'll try to contact the editors who added them and see if they know. Master of Puppets Call me MoP!☺</sub></span> 00:27, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite, proposal
Talk:LORA (missile)

message: LORA is also an acronym for "Level of Repair Analysis" per Supportability Engineering description at Lockheed Martin.  192.31.106.34 (talk) 02:44, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Level Of Repair Analysis

message: :There have been reports of this in more reliable media than R/T. The technology extends to several other boxed quasi-ballistic missiles, and also less sophisticated weapons such as the Klub K and Chinese and indeed U.S. systems. Seems WP:POV to single out LORA. Also unbalanced in not providing other sources touching on WP:UNDUE, which discuss the new development on a multi-national scale. Willing to discuss a more widespread use of sources and the addition of this info to other weapon systems articles. Also a rewording. Seems R/T is rattled basically. Irondome (talk) 04:39, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Proliferation concerns' 
Talk:Saitō Dōsan

message: This Article appears to be either IN PROGRESS as a translation or up to a PROOFREADERS NEEDED point.  Could the last worker on this Article reassign the briefing to In Progress or Proofreaders Needed from Translation Requests, whichever is appropriate? - B.C.Schmerker 08:20, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think so. At least some parts, such as an infobox and the references section do not seem to be traslated. Dalobuca 02:56, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overall
Talk:Musō Soseki

message: Most info taken from the Japanese version of the page. Please continue to add and back up info. Thanks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Liashi (talk • contribs) 02:56, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion 

message: I'm not at all versed in Wikipedia rules and conventions, but it seems to me that more and more people are sneakily adding mentions of products on wiki pages. Books are the easiest and most common offense, IMHO. The paragraph "English Translations of Mucho Mondo", as well as the previous paragraph also mentioning a book, seem obvious attempts at plugging products. Anybody can search the book section of Amazon or other online booksellers websites for "Soseki" or "Mucho Mondo"... I will wait a couple of days to see if any Wikipedia expert comments this before attempting to remove these superfluous lines.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.77.23.42 (talk) 12:20, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Covert advertising for books in wiki pages 