lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Shabnam Tolouei

message: It says that she is banned from acting in Iran because of her religion, but it doesn't say what that religion is?  is she Muslim? Christian? Druze? Jewish?? what? -- Ļıßζېấשּׂ~ۘ  Ώƒ ﻚĢęخ (talk) 00:03, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Religion 
Talk:The Beautiful Lie (album)

message: For the sake of contrast in the review section, here is a link to a negative review. As an editor at Crawdaddy!, and to comply with COI guidelines, I am not posting the link to this review. However, I would like to recommend it on its merits, and hope that an editor will find the time to examine the review and—if he or she sees fit—post it to the professional reviews section. I appreciate your time. Crawdaddy! (negative) 2008Asst. Editor, Crawdaddy! FenderRhodesScholar | Talk 17:44, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: review suggestion
Talk:Meagre set

message: Is a non-meagre set in English also called a fat set? I know that it is (translatedly) called this in German, at least by my own lecturer on the subject... If this is English too, it should be noted somewhere, I think.--93.133.222.51 (talk) 19:06, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Not in my experience.  --Trovatore (talk) 19:33, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Fat set

message: : In any space X, the union of any family of open sets of the first category is of the first category.
This is either trivial, as there are no open sets of the first category, or deeply misleading.  Yes, I understand that it is properly referenced; I suppose the author of that book uses nonstandard terminology.  The Banach Category Theorem says that a set that is locally meagre is meagre.  --Yecril (talk) 06:07, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Banach Category Theorem 

message: The first of 'Meagre subsets and subspaces' under 'Examples and sufficient conditions' I believe has a mistake.
Specifically the direction "only if" in "A singleton set is ... a non-meagre subset if and only if it is an isolated point"
For a counterexample, consider the coarse topology with 2 points. The only 'nowhere dense' set is the empty set, thus the only meagre set is the empty set. However singletons are not open, therefore points are not isolated.
I am considering changing the line to "A singleton set is always a non-meagre subspace (i.e. it is a non-meagre topological space). If it is an isolated point then it is a non-meagre subset, while the converse holds for T1 spaces.", with no reference (unless somebody points one out of course).
Ggshaw (talk) 20:52, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect Example (corrected)
Talk:Mean absolute error

message: Mean absolute error has the same units as the quantity being measured, so it's more like standard deviation than variance, isn't it? Parksy 18:38, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the same way. I hope someone can talk about it a little bit more. Jackzhp 11:53, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "the mean absolute error is similar to variance"?

message: Is the mean absolute error sometimes called mean unsigned error (MUE)? Or is there a difference?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.198.95.238 (talk) 10:42, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  same as mean unsigned error? 

message: We don't seem to define m before the sentence: "Provided that the probability distribution of X is such that the above expectation exists, then m is a median of X if and only if m is a minimizer"? Or maybe I'm missing something. Is m the MAE? Lionfish0 (talk) 07:53, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Optimality property
Talk:Mereotopology

message: I've:
*Selected the GEMTC of Casati and Varzi (1999) as a paradigmatic mereotopological system, and added the section describing it;
*Expanded the references and linked as many references as possible to online texts;
*Rewritten much of the remainder of the entry.
I am very open to suggestions that another system (such as that of Roeper 1997 or Cohn and Varzi 2003) should be briefly described here as well, or that GEMTC should be deemphasized.
I would also welcome additions that would improve how this entry connects with the large corpus of received mathematics, especially topology and set theory. I know no topology, but admire from a great distance the subject and the people who have contributed to it. Those who gave us so much of basic topology, e.g., Hausdorff and the Poles, were also close to the founders of set theory, mereology, and mathematical logic. Kuratowski definitely comes to mind.Palnot (talk) 18:57, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Additions I would welcome

message: The article mentions point-free geometry, and I'd like to see some commentary relating this to pointless topology. linas 15:32, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Point-free topology
Talk:Shahrnush Parsipur

message: She mentions several women in a kind of genealogy of women writers she see herself a descendent of. see  - some of these articles for linking? Smkolins (talk) 15:26, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  something about a writer's genealogy she wrote for herself.... 
Talk:Metalogic

message: In my opinion Metalogic  and Philosophy of Logic - as the terms are used - relate to distinct (if sometimes ralated) issues & the articles should not be merged. Godel's incompleteness theorem for instance is itself a metalogical theorem; its significance might be an issue in philosophy of logic.
--Philogo 13:06, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: agreed. Pontiff Greg Bard (talk) 11:07, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thinking about it, the article should probably be a quasi-disambiguation dealing with formal logic, as it consists of model theory and proof theory.  We also need a citation for use of the term, and some citation for its importance in the field (whatever field that might be).  So a merger is inappropriate but stubification might very well be.  — Arthur Rubin |  (talk) 17:49, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: oppose merge

message: godlessness: against the supposed and metalogically unfounded precosmic cosmogonous personhood
ἀθεότητα ἀθεότης godlessness αθεότητα αθεότης
:::We don't have a metalogical page on the subject.
# is personhood self-causal? some physicists claim that pretopological spaces are self-causal
# even if personhood isn't the most important quality/attribute of god, that constitutes him even less self-coherent; rhetorical persuasion isn't supperior than metalogic
:before you nuke IRAN, don't be IRAN (a cosmological personocrat); before you nuke the Russian President, don't be a cosmological personocrat like him
:commies are cosmologically antipersonocrats, but at the same time hardcore political personocrats; and their philosophy of atheism is metalogically inferior than that of the free world  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:587:4102:6800:B4C6:1C57:B36A:8117 (talk) 22:24, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: We can't do anything with that unless secondary reliable sources are cited with specific points to improve the article (or to support your proposed article).  This page is not a general discussion forum.  Thanks, —PaleoNeonate – 00:21, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''make page'': [[Metalogical analysis of God]] (not a [[simple (philosophy)]]) according to [[information theory]] and [[mereology]] due to memories and thinking processing 

message: Does anyone know what this is supposed to mean? Maybe someone was trying to make a point, but what? The word is just meta+logic. How is μεταλογική an English term? I'll delete it unless there are reasonable objections. Volunteer1234 (talk) 03:10, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  (Greek [shaped after the English term] μεταλογική: μετά "follow on after"; here used for deeper causal analysis + λόγος "reason") 

message: * Chinese: 元逻辑
Please create the Chinese page, or even pay a translator.
It is important!!!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:587:4124:7400:B971:AE19:BF2B:D35B (talk) 15:09, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translations
Talk:Hamad bin Mohammed Al Sharqi

message: I have completed a copy edit of the article, and added a "confusing" tag because I did not understand the phrase "exceeding allocations of similar small Emirates". Perhaps it can be clarified. Happy editing! -Samuel Tan 02:47, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Copy edit (July 2008)

message: I'd like to see a picture of him.  Retro Agnostic (talk) 10:00, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs picture
Talk:Mian–Chowla sequence

message: This is an extremely poor explanation. The article should be rewritten.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.221.29.97 (talk) 23:12, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I think that is an extremely poor assessment and you should rewrite your criticism. Why is it a poor explanation? Is this a topic you learnt from another source and you find a specific flaw with the way it is explained here? Or is the topic something you don't already know and which after having read the entire article you still don't understand? Or is there another problem I haven't identified? CompositeFan (talk) 19:36, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Explain it Better
Talk:Shaista Shameem

message: , in your edit summary here I think you're getting things backwards. Yes, we don't have a source saying her father moved out after Partition, but neither do we have one claiming he did before, and as far as I can see we don't have a source explicitly ascribing Pakistani descent. The burden is on those adding adding contentious categories to provide a source. – Uanfala (talk) 10:36, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Uanfala. Please refer to the following source, as quoted: Her father was from Multan, in what is now Pakistan, and her mother was born in Fiji. It mentions Multan and Pakistan as her father's place of origin. As such, I don't see the contention in categorising her under Pakistani descent as that is what the source identifies her as. If the source had mentioned anything to the contrary, I think it would have been apparent but I am not seeing the case here. WP:BURDEN applies equally (in fact more so) on the contrary claim also. Kind regards, Mar4d (talk) 15:25, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, so the wording implies that her father emigrated before Pakistan came into existence. Had a reliable source explicitly described her as being of Pakistani descent, that would have been fine. But this ascription is not made by any source, but by a wikipedia editor. I'm sure you must be aware that this is not a good idea. – Uanfala (talk) 20:41, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pakistani descent
Talk:Stormont Vail Events Center

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved   — Amakuru (talk) 01:31, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Kansas Expocentre →  – Move over redirect per WP:NAMECHANGE and WP:COMMONNAME, the venue has completed its name change and local press releases and news articles refer to the venue more frequently by the new name. (Although the former page title of Landon Arena could also be considered the common name as the arena within venue has not changed names, but as the article has some other info about the venue too, using Stormont is fine too.) Yosemiter (talk) 15:22, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

text: This is a contested technical request (permalink). GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 17:30, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 11 August 2021
Talk:Shalom Dov Wolpo

message: Is he really anti-Zionist or anti-Secular? It is confusing considering his party had ultra-nationalists. ShimonChai (talk) 23:31, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anti-Zionism?
Talk:Intrust Bank Arena

message: Per this edit by , the WP:COMMONNAME for the arena appears to be just "Intrust" not "INTRUST" per independent sources as shown in in this basic search and this. Yosemiter (talk) 17:38, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intrust name
Talk:Shane Koyczan

message: This article has been tagged for speedy deletion, based on the assertion "that Shane Koyczan seems to be about a person, ... but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia."
Shane Koyczan is notable as a founder and a pioneer in the field of contemporary spoken word. Two assertions included in this article support my claim. First, this article states that "Together with Mighty Mike McGee and C. R. Avery, he is the co-founder of spoken word, "talk rock" trio, Tons of Fun University (T.O.F.U.)" (my emph.). Assuming T.O.F.U. remains significant, information about its founder ought to be so as well. Second, a referenced assertion puts Mr. Koyczan as the "first Canadian to win the Individual Championship title at the [2000] National Poetry Slam." As firsts in any sport or competition are of historical and statistical significance, the life of the pioneer who attained that honor ought to be briefly recorded.
Since these assertions do indeed "indicate how or why the subject is notable," this article should not be deleted. - Digipoet 15:32, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I see that a notability tag was placed on the Tons of Fun University article in February 2007. In the five months that have passed, these concerns have not been addressed. I add that, like this article, Tons of Fun University is entirely lacking in references. Without sources, a biography of a living person is certainly  open to speedy deletion. I write this recognizing my past contributions to this article. Victoriagirl 16:18, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The speedy deletion of this page is contested.
Talk:Missing data

message: Ironically, this article is missing information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.195.90.156 (talk • contribs) 
The section on questions to ask about missing data seems more appropriate to an undergraduate research methods text than to an encyclopedia.  Randomactsofaffect (talk) 18:23, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Questions to ask about missing data

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: page moved. Macr86 (talk) 02:31, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
A remarkably quick closure of a so-called discussion. An obvious question would have been, and still is, what to do about :Category:Missing values  . Melcombe (talk) 14:41, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

text: Yes, this was closed too quickly. It is not the only (or the most) controversial close by this editor. I agree with Qwfp's reason for the move, though. I'd support moving the category too. --Avenue (talk) 22:49, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

text: I have place a cfr request for renaming the category. Melcombe (talk) 16:39, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename 

message: The reference list starts off with numbers and then goes to dots.  I don't know how to fix this, but it doesn't look right.  PeterLFlomPhD (talk) 20:20, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  References issue Suggestion
Talk:Office of Secure Transportation

message: I tagged this as POV because it seems to have been written by a government employee.  I do not know enough about the subject to make any edits except grammatical and stylistic, so I leave the WP:NPOV fixing to others. − Twas Now ( talk • contribs • e-mail ) 03:43, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tagged as POV 

message: Even though it was cut and paste from government sources, it doesn't seem POV to me.
Roadrunner 13:52, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing tag 

message: I propose merging this article with the main National Nuclear Security Administration article.
It is an office of the Defense Programs division of NNSA. Kazari (talk) 10:52, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger
Talk:Shanna Collins

message: The article says she was born June 10, 1980, "although she claims to be three years younger".
After a little searching, the only birthday for her I can find is June 10, 1983 (even IMDb says this).
Due to the possible damage this could have on her reputation, I am changing the birth year to 1983.
If anyone actually finds a reference that says she was born in 1980 but does claim to be born in 1983, please bring it up here. Thanks. Sentient Planet (talk) 16:51, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthday
Talk:Lucas Luhr

message: Lucas Luhr or Lucas Lühr?  The359 03:44, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The second. --Pc13 08:07, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Luhr himself doesn't use an umlaut.  Check out the German version of his official website (), the Audi site (, 1st paragraph), and the ALMS site ().  At any rate, most places just use "Luhr" so that should be enough to satisfy WP:COMMONNAME. --Spyder_Monkey (Talk) 00:32, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Shannon James (model)

message: This and other Wikipedias in other languages have been relentlessly spammed by anonymous IPs based in Israel (where the domain is registered) for many months. It's gotten sufficiently bad as to warrant addition to the spam blacklist and I have removed a number of these links in anticipation of blacklisting:
*Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spam#modelsobserver.com (permanent link)
*:meta:Talk:Spam blacklist#modelsobserver.com (permanent link)
Most, but not all, had been added by the site-owner.
If an established, high-volume editor sees value to the specific link I deleted from this article, please let me know and it can be evaluated for addition to the spam "whitelist"
--A. B. (talk •  contribs)  03:21, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: modelsobserver.com links
Talk:Moore method

message: Here is an earnest question: while Moore's racist views definitely should be included in his biography (there is no denying them), how is this relevant for the associated "Moore Method" wikipedia page?  Do we also add to any mention of MLK the fact that he was unfaithful to his wife (while a being a priest of all professions), or that he plagarised his dissertation?  No, because, those things are not relevant to most discussions of MLK's life and teachings.  
For these reasons I recommend we remove "racist" from this page (but not from his biography).    — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.167.195.36 (talk) 09:59, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: E. H. Moore racism

message: I've heard that R.L. Moore, and another great "discovery learning" educator Arnold Ross, were both influenced by the teaching style of E.H. Moore.  (R.L. Moore was a student of E.H. Moore, and Arnold Ross was a student of Dickson, who was a student of E.H. Moore.)  If this is true, and anyone can supply details, it might be an interesting addition to this article.Singularitarian 10:25, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: E. H. Moore influence?

message: (Modified) Moore Method is becoming quite popular these days. Is a list of people who use this technique beneficial to the article? 76.84.126.187 (talk) 20:25, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I assume you are questioning whether we should keep the "Current usage" section, as opposed to offering to add more examples. I've just tagged that section with . I don't object to keeping a few notable (and cited) examples, but the list has grown too large to be useful, IMO. - dcljr (talk) 22:59, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of Moore Method Users
Talk:Multiple (mathematics)

message: The page is really messy. I did a few style corrections but it'll require a complete rewrite. I don't have time at the moment but if someone does, do not forget to mention about the greatest common multiple - thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stdazi (talk • contribs) 08:50, 30 May 2007
:Some cleanup done, not by me. Melchoir 19:33, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops. I spammed. =( 209.247.21.231 (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 01:04, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

text: 0 may be a natural number, according to Natural number. What does it matter whether 0 is a natural number or not anyway? Brian Jason Drake 07:52, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

text: By that property, 0 would always be the least multiple of 2 numbers.Do you mean the least common multiple? That's defined to be positive, unless at least one of the original numbers is zero. Brian Jason Drake 06:19, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup required 

message: Someone changed "whereas" to "where as". I thought it was "whereas" and the top results in a Google search for "where as" all seem to have "whereas". Brian Jason Drake 07:31, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "whereas" or "where as"? 

message: If, as is stated in the Properties section, a multiple of a number is the product of the number and a natural number then 0 and -14 are not multiples of 7 because 0 and -2 are not natural numbers. The question is: Does a multiple of an integer have to be the product with the and an integer, a natural number, or non-negative integers? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.19.196.175 (talk) 18:19, 15 January, 2009 (UTC)
:Perhaps what the author meant was that multiplying an integer by a natural number was one way to obtain a multiple of that integer, though not necessarily the only way. (An anonymous user has since changed that point in the article to refer to integers only; I have then reworded that point for clarity.) Brian Jason Drake 09:54, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multiples: products of integers or natural numbers? 

message: I lowered the rating of this page to Start (from a B) for several reasons. There is confusion as to whether the term is referring to integer multiples or to more general multiples. The examples do not clarify the issue, but rather compound the confusion. The properties list is a bit short. The references are just dictionary sites except for the last one which is just a glossary list for a state education department (as an aside, this list has so many errors in it that it must be considered unreliable ... that it is a state document reflects very poorly on the mathematical education in that state.) These are not the kinds of issues that a B-level article should have. Bill Cherowitzo  (talk) 19:41, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Start Class

message: Submultiple redirect here, but there's nothing. Olli Niemitalo (talk) 09:21, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: This redirect is wrong. As it is a WP:ORPHAN I'll propose to delete it. D.Lazard (talk) 16:10, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Submultiple
Talk:Multiunit auction

message: Multiunit auction == combinatorial auction?
nybbles 01:04, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Greetings. I wonder why this piece has been labelled a mathematics stub. In my humble opinion, it belongs to the field of Economics stubs... This is not an attack on mathematicians. I'm sure they're working much more than we economists in game theory and other related topics... But this topic is within scope of Mathematical Economics. Mechanism Design, to be more precise. I would like to hear your comments before making any edit. Pallida  Mors 11:41, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mathematics stub? 

message: Multiunit auction has two forms: Uniform price auction and Discriminatory Price Auction. Both can well be described on page. Timelezz (talk) 00:17, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge: [[Multiunit auction]]+[[Uniform price auction]]