Talk:Eurovision Song Contest 1965

message: Hmm 2 things I have noticed whilst going thorugh things onm the score sheet there seems to be no 1 point vote for Belgium (loking at sources all the otehr scores add uo to what they shuld be), and i am getting conflicting data for UK score a coupkle of sources say 25 others say 26. Did Belgium somehow get allowed to give teh 1 point to the UK too? (Note one other source gives mad conflicating data that is defentaly wrong). -fonzy
well acording to this source i have found that has calimed to be veyr thougly checked Belgium awarded 6 to the UK which only suggests that it did btoh award teh 1 point and 5 points. -fonzy
:The scoring procedure was different this year. Every country was only allowed to give 9 points. The song that was awarded the most votes in the jury would get 5, the next 3, and the final song 1. If only 2 countries received votes, the country with the most votes received 6 points, and the other country 3. If only one song received votes, that country got all 9 points.
:Source: []
:Kumorifox (talk) 16:25, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: source: []  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rosertnom (talk • contribs) 11:05, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Score sheet

message: I think the phrase nul points merits an article of its own – particularly as it is likely to mystify anyone (specially a French-speaker!) who is unfamiliar with the folklore of the competition. The phrase is, of course, cod-French for "zero points" – but does anyone know who first used it? -- Picapica 19:57, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In the article it even appears as "null points" with a double "l", which isn't any language at all. Correct English would be "nil points" with an "i" ("nil" being the standard word for "0" in such sports as soccer) or "zero points", and correct French "zéro point" (singular, with an accent on "zéro") or "pas de points" (plural). It seems the British media got hold of the fake-French expression and started using it along with the correct French one "douze points" - which became famous because the scores were generally announced in the order English first and then French, so this was the culminating phrase uttered when a song received the highest number of points from a national jury. Since the phrase "null points" was never actually used (this is the only place I've ever seen it), I suggest that the quotation marks be removed and replaced with one of the correct English phrases, or simply "no points" or "no points at all".89.212.50.177 (talk) 11:56, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: "Nul points" is a colloquial term used within the Eurovision circles, such as fans, presenters, organisers - which is detailed at Voting at the Eurovision Song Contest#Scoring no points. Colloquialisms are permitted. Wes Wolf Talk  13:43, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''nul points'' 

message: As previously set up, the song titles linked only to an external site. There are, however, Wikipedia articles relating to many of these songs. My latest emendation is an attempt to incorporate these internal links as well as those external ones already included. My solution is probably messy and in breach of several Wp style guidelines, but it's a start... - Picapica 21:09, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Song title links 

message: :Image:ESC1965.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:02, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:ESC1965.jpg

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Eurovision Song Contest 1965. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120718022509/http://www.infosajten.com/esc/esc/swedishspokesmen.html to http://www.infosajten.com/esc/esc/swedishspokesmen.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:19, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Alistair Burnett was not the UK jury spokesperson. Further research would be needed to determine the name of the person reading out the British scores, but whoever it is, it is not Burnett. 212.2.180.165 (talk) 21:05, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not going to add Alastair Burnet back to the article, because it was unsourced before it was removed, but what leads you to believe that it's not him?  dummelaksen  (talk • contribs) 21:23, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Just listen to the clip! It's not him. Apart from that, in 1965, Alistair Burnett was the editor of the heavy weight political publication 'The Economist'. His only broadcast credentials were as an economist and journalist who fronted hard hitting political debate and investigative programmes. He later became the news anchor for ITN and fronted the BBC's General Election coverage. Anyone who thinks he spent an evening sitting around Broadcasting House simply to announce the names of three countries and a number for a total broadcast time of 15 seconds, when he didn't even work for the BBC, is probably the same person who invented that Tony Hadley was representing San Marino in 2017. Putting Burnett's name on this page is simply clever vandalism. 212.2.180.165 (talk) 09:24, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

text: Update: it was actually sourced from IMDb, but I don't think this is a reliable source so I'm still not going to add it back. Would still like to hear from User:212.2.180.165 though.  dummelaksen  (talk • contribs) 21:27, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: IMDB is almost as notoriously ridiculous as wikipedia and even wikipedia won't accept IMDB as reliable. The UK jury spokespersons for 1963 & 1964 were also listed with the bogus names of Michael Aspel & Pete Murray, neither of whom performed the task. I removed them also.212.2.180.165 (talk) 15:13, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  UK Jury Spokesperson