lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Jim Chu

message: Should info be added about his being deployed for the 1994 riot? He was one of the officers interviewed on TV at that time. 65.94.47.63 (talk) 11:25, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: 1994 riot info?
Talk:309th Maintenance Wing

message: On October 18, 2012 the article on the 309th Troop Carrier Group was made a redirect to this article and the material there was moved to this article.  However, article history for the 309th Troop Carrier Group prior to that date remains with that article.
--Lineagegeek (talk) 20:29, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: 309th Troop Carrier Group

message: The article on the 426th Bombardment Squadron should be merged into this article.  Unlike the other squadrons assigned to the group, the 426th had no separate history from the group, and even that history was shared entirely with the group for two years as a training unit during World War II.  No separate notability.  --Lineagegeek (talk) 18:53, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Lineagegeek (talk) 21:36, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger
Talk:Moros, Zaragoza

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Moros, Zaragoza, España, 2013-01-07, DD 11-13 HDR.JPG will be appearing as picture of the day on March 22, 2017. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2017-03-22. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:24, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Moros, Zaragoza, España, 2013-01-07, DD 11-13 HDR.JPG]] to appear as POTD soon
Talk:95th Air Base Wing

message: There is a separate article on the 95th Bomb Group (not the 95th Bombardment Group, which redirects to this article).  It is a stub with little information on the group during World War II, but does have a couple of items that are not in this article.  Most of the information, however, duplicates or paraphrases this article.  --Lineagegeek (talk) 19:42, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Since the merger seems uncontested, I will do it.  History for the 95th Bomb Group prior to this date will remain with that page  --Lineagegeek (talk) 13:00, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger of 95th Bomb Group Article 

message: Is/was it also called the "95th Bomb Group"? If so, why is this not mentioned in the article? 76.189.141.37 (talk) 02:10, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: 95th Bomb Group
Talk:State University of Tetova

message: In the infobox, it states that the "State University of Tetova" is a former name (former, aka no longer used, right?) while the top of the infobox uses "University of Tetovo" and the article's body uses "University of Tetova", and the article's title is that of the former name "State University of Tetova" instead. This is confusing. --- ❖ SilentResident ❖ (talk ✉ | contribs ✎) 12:51, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree, applied changes.--AirWolf talk 22:54, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official VS former or is it just an alternate name?
Talk:89th Airlift Wing

message: There are two sections here covering the same topic. Also, the Components section lists groups and squadrons separateley so you have to guess what squadron goes with what group. I propose to fix that, and will start out doing so, by eliminating "Units." The information should be transferred to Components. However, the squadrons should be under their groups. Also, I like the format of Units better so I will put Components in that format. If there are any other suggestions of course we can discuss. These are only small changes, easily altered.Botteville (talk) 01:32, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Changed my mind. The components section is actually history of components, while Units is current units. I'm trying to figure some way of flagging the difference. For now I will concentrate on UNits.Botteville (talk) 01:49, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: UNits and Components duplication
Talk:Water injection (oil production)

message: I've hardly come accross an article on water injection that talks about its negative effects, for example, if your company is forced by regulation to re-inject all produced water when the reservoir does not need it.
Can someone shed some lightOdigweo 16:51, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

message: When water is injected does it effect on drinking water?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.106.246.198 (talk) 19:56, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Water injection
Talk:81st Training Wing

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on 81st Training Wing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070215223950/http://www.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123025910 to http://www.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123025910
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
 --Lineagegeek (talk) 21:34, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified
Talk:Athematic stem

message: As is, this page appears little different from the article "vowel stems" and could be merged.  However, if the page was to discuss Indo-European theme vowels as sometimes having lexical influence (e.g., IE thematic stems with ĕ or ŏ sometimes indicating action), the page might become more distinct.  I do not know enough yet to write that myself; I only know that such might be written. Delvebelow 16:55, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article could really use an example of a word which is athematic. I think I understand what "thematic" means from the Latin example "rosa" given in the article (I suppose the phenomenon is either the same as, or related somehow to, the way verbs in Spanish fall into -ar, -er, -ir classes?) — but given that this article is about "athematic", it really ought to provide an example of an athematic word, preferably also in Latin, for comparison. --Quuxplusone (talk) 21:14, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Example?
Talk:University of Limpopo

message: SO-VE-NGA
So - SOtho
VE - VEnda
NGA - tsoNGA
These are the 3 Nationality Groups who formed the backbone of tertiary education provision at the University.
 Gazankulu - was a homelnd in the former South Africa.
Dr Zakes Motene
South Africa
drzkmotene@mweb.co.za  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.207.47.60 (talk) 19:25, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:List of geographic names of Iranian origin

message: This is a list for all the geographic names of Iranian origin, regardless when the terms were invented. As long as the name is used, it belongs on the list. Nagorno Karabakh is partly derived from Iranian languages, therefore it belongs. I reinserted it.Hajji Piruz 21:56, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Parishan, do not bring the Karabakh dispute onto this page.Hajji Piruz 15:10, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hello. In the bigger countries such as Iran where there are hundreds of place names of Iranian origin, I think its best just to list the main ones, such as the major cities or regions, instead of all of them (that would be too much!). For the rest, we can just refer people to the main pages, such as List of Iranian Cities. What do you guys think?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kalifo (talk • contribs) 20:38, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Iranian places names
Talk:British Columbia Sheriff Service

message: In reviewing the page, only two references are noted at the bottom and only one in-line reference is cited. The information in in-depth and the majority of additions were made by user:96.50.106.162 and user:24.108.67.100, both of whom geo-locate to the Victoria region of British Columbia, adding suspicion that the additions were made by someone with close connection to the subject. Shoman93 (talk) 19:05, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flagged for cleanup/close connection editor
Talk:University of the Virgin Islands

message: Since by definition to be a HBCU an institution had to have been founded prior to the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and UVI was founded in 1962, is it correct to say that UVI is the last such institution founded?  If so, shouldn't this be mentioned in the article?  2600:1004:B11D:8AA3:0:57:334D:E401 (talk) 21:29, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last HBCU?
Talk:58th Special Operations Wing

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on 58th Special Operations Wing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070401033357/http://afhra.maxwell.af.mil/rso/rso_index.html to http://afhra.maxwell.af.mil/rso/rso_index.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
  --Lineagegeek (talk) 23:12, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified
Talk:57th Wing

message: A French Croix de Guerre should be added under the unit decorations color template.  The 57th Wing was awarded the French Croix de Guerre as a unit in  WWII for actions from Oct. 1942 to May 1945.  The color scheme for the Croix de Guerre is four broad green stripes on a purple mauve background.Silver Bayonet (talk) 04:48, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Croix de Guerre
Talk:Bastion fortress

message: I propose to merge the articles Bastion fortress, Star fort, and Trace italienne. These 3 articles discuss the exact same thing! In stead of 3 fragmented articles, the combined info could be very comprehensive. I suggest merging the info to Bastion fortress: it seems to me as the most fitting title. -- P199 17:03, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal
Talk:46th Test Wing

message: On 27 June 2012, the article on the 46th Bombardment Group was made a redirect to this page.  The only unduplicated information (an image and a footnote) were transferred to this article.  However, article history prior to the date of redirect emains with that article.--Lineagegeek (talk) 16:00, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: 46th Bombardment Group

message: Custos libertate? 
To be perfectly honest, not only "custos" should not mean "guardians" (but "guardian", as already stated); even "libertate" is an ablative case, therefore cannot be translated as "of liberty", an expression which would rather suggest a genitive, i.e. "libertatis".
The whole thing is dubious, and should be double checked on a proper source, I think. --Filippof (talk) 21:23, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Troubled motto
Talk:Grave Danger/merge archive

message: *merge makes sense to avoid 3 entries for 2 episodes. Unless it is decided that we should just have one entry for both I suppose. (Emperor 23:47, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Note: I have added the delightful image of intestines here because I am drafting a new, merged article and need somewhere in articlespace to put it. Editus Reloaded 14:19, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds good. Rather than piping it might be better to do with a redirect on the individual entries page. Also to clarify my vote I agree with the merge of the others inot here moved to this address: Grave Danger (CSI episode). Seems like a consensus? (Emperor 13:52, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, then. Redirects from the individual articles to he relevant sections of this one. As you say, this seems like a consensus so I will do that now. BTW, opinions on the new version of this page? Editus Reloaded 14:21, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Space Launch Delta 45

message: The operations section, which could explain their responsibilities is so brief (shorter than the symbology of the shield/logo!) that it does not explain what SLD45 does or is responsible for. Do they ensure range safety, do they do weather reports and assess weather related launch criteria ? Do they ensure launches don't collide with other objects in orbit ? What else ? - Rod57 (talk) 20:17, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Operations section is too brief
Talk:33rd Fighter Wing

message: many public domain photos are now available of f-35s in 33d FW markings - perhaps it is time to update the photo appearing in this article?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.158.48.13 (talk) 11:10, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  update f-35 photo 
Talk:University of Novi Sad

message: The literal translation of "Univerzitet U Novom Sadu" would be "The University IN Novi Sad", and not "University OF Novi Sad". Just thought you should know.
Mátyás (talk) 15:19, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Univerzitet '''U''' Novom Sadu 

message: *  - template for user pages of students and graduates of the University of Novi Sad.
 --Comparativist1 (talk) 22:01, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Template
Talk:Gordon the Tramp

message: This has been edited, to include people from Bournemouth and Mysterious people. In passing and speaking to Gordon people have commented that he hasn't actually revealed much about his own life, a                  long with the facts that not many people know much about him and that he is known for telling the time, thus makes him a mysterious individual  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Unionx (talk • contribs) 12:56, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit to Categories
Talk:Soft Construction with Boiled Beans (Premonition of Civil War)

message: I do beleive that the figure in the painting is grabbing itself by the breast. If you look closely, you can see a female nipple. Perhaps this was a statement that the rebels were being too harsh in their attempt to gain prosperity (represented as milk) from the state (the grimacing figure with the breast) 198.111.167.146 (talk) 22:12, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Noticed Something

message: The given interpretation seems to be written by someone less than professional, even going so far as to use the word "realistic" as opposed to life-like, thus attributing this painting to be of the realist movement. Perhaps some revisions should be made to the analysis section, or at least some words replaced to give off the intended meaning and make the overall page look more professional. 
ChocoRokk (talk) 20:42, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Weak interpretation
Talk:EADS Mako/HEAT

message: I was wandering what will be the final name for this trainer jet, It could be: AT-200, or Mako or H.E.A.T. or just all AT-200 Mako MigeruMadorido
(88.15.112.120)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.15.112.120 (talk) 18:37, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The proper name 

message: The Mako has been canceled over three years ago - therefore the article is not just not up to date, but there is nothing more to come. --noclador (talk) 15:18, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cancellation 

message: Is there a reason behind the German military continuously abandoning projects developed by their own country? The Luftwaffe is currently stuck w/surplus T-38 trainers. The MAKO would be a better bargain than the Eurofighter.96.238.134.140 (talk) 10:56, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: German Defence Industry
Talk:Autism Research Institute

message: I had a COI with ARI about six months ago and wrote most of the current article-text. I noticed that a new consensus has emerged to make the page about ARI, rather than DAN! exclusively. As I mentioned here last month, I originally wrote an article about ARI last year, that I trimmed back to focus on DAN! based on prior consensus for a DAN! page. Now that consensus has shifted back to an ARI article, I think this original draft, while still heavily focused on DAN!, might be more reasonable as a general ARI page. It doesn't make sense to have an ARI page, that's really exclusively focused on DAN!, though it may make sense to have one heavily focused on it if it is the main thing they are notable for. CorporateM (Talk) 18:53, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  ARI page versus DAN 

message: I have some concerns about this article after reading this. I put a tag for now. Karlpoppery (talk) 03:48, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not all view points 

message: This article is the subject of a discussion on the Fringe theories/Noticeboard. KarlPoppery (talk) 20:47, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fringe theories/Noticeboard 

message: I would like to see the article restored to its April 2017 form, which I think was much more informative.  This article is not just about DAN.  The editor who trimmed it seems to be mostly inactive lately, so I want to see if anyone else has thoughts to share. Thanks, —Soap— 19:51, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restore?
Talk:Chimborazo Hospital

message: The coordinates are wrong. It takes one to an area far from Richmond. If you search for Chimborazo Park it takes you to the correct location. I don't know how to fix it. CsikosLo (talk) 19:39, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinates 

message: During its military existence wasn't there a brewery on site too? In the 1860's beer (and spirits) would have been seen as medicinal after all. 165.120.193.246 (talk) 18:52, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chimborazo Hospital
Talk:Gary Madine

message: The comment "Madine's antics in Carlisle and his arrogant attitude towards life has made him very unpopular in the city, in particular being arrested for being drunk and disorderly on a night out in Carlisle. Also the rivalry struck up with a groundsman at the club, which resulted in Madine bottling him in Time bar late one Saturday night did not aid his cause"  Needs to be referenced I think.
Whilst I don't doubt its authenticity, it really is just rumour at the moment and could do with backing up with facts.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.140.133.155 (talk) 17:06, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Madine's alleged antics 

message: are those Sheffield Wednesday stats proposterous to anyone else? 143 goals in 88 games are you sure? needs amending  — Preceding unsigned comment added by QueenAlexandria (talk • contribs) 18:37, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism

message: The page is locked "to prevent vandalism" but it also prevents correction. His goals scored for Coventry is plainly wrong. Mackemsteve (talk) 08:55, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page Locked
Talk:Vermont Technical College

message: I have removed the NUMEROUS Hartness Library links, and simply left the Hartness Library link.  StanBrinkerhoff 01:28, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Library removed

message: This is written like an ad, past the Student Clubs section.  A p3rson ✉  21:28, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 
Talk:Washtenaw Community College

message: Vandalising pages on wikipedia using your community college's network, pretty funny. Vandalising your own college's page using the college's own computers, pretty dumb.  You know they can work out who was logged on at the time these edits happened. Dumb dumb dumb!
 Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. And that will mean your whole college will get blocked. So students won't be able to do their assignments.  Oh, by the way, you spelt initiative wrong. And Whipper Snapper.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.22.115.105 (talk) 01:04, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism of wikipedia 

message: Am I the only one who thinks this page currently reads like it was written by Washtenaw's marketing/public relations teams? Amyipdev (talk) 00:38, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reads like an ad
Talk:The Used's Second EP

message: I suggest we merge the two pages, and perhaps rename it "Unnamed EP by The Used" or the like.  At this point, we certainly aren't getting a second EP in early 2008 when we haven't even gotten one yet!  Judging by Jeph's comments, anyway, looks like there is only going to be one.--Wehwalt 03:08, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal
Talk:Kill the House Lights

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Thursday's Next Release and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 3#Thursday's Next Release until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Regards, SONIC678 21:13, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Thursday's Next Release" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Inspector Cramer

message: I have modified the discussion of Cramer's attitude toward Wolfe, partly because I don't think it was accurate and partly because it was unattributed. I have also deleted the external reference in support of the statement that most Nero Wolfe fans do not accept Lionel T. Cramer as the character's full name -- a couple of postings to a Yahoo group do not constitute evidence of non-acceptance by most fans. I believe that the reference to Stout forgetting that he'd christened Cramer as Fergus comes from McAleer's bio, but I don't own that; perhaps someone who does can confirm and reference. I've added some material and references, and provided the exact quote regarding the black orchids. TurnerHodges 17:52, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Edits to Cramer's article

message: I'm uncomfortable with the statement that Goldsborough gave the name Lionel to Cramer. It needs a citation. The external reference to a Yahoo group, which I have deleted, pointed at some postings, one of which mentioned that the post's author had searched unsuccessfully for a reference to Lionel in the corpus. Again, that is insufficient evidence on which to base the claim that Goldsborough was responsible for the name. For the present, I've left the claim in place because I can't prove it isn't true.TurnerHodges 18:27, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cramer's Forename
Talk:Moscow Declarations

message: See edit Revision as of 03:13, 4 April 2007 (edit) (undo) Irpen  UN was founded in 1945, there could not have been UN declarations in 1942
The term United Nations was being used by the Allies of World War II for their alliance before the treaty was signed formally creating the Charter based UN. See the introduction in Allies of World War II 'During December 1941, Roosevelt devised the name "United Nations" (UN) for the Allies, and the Declaration by United Nations, on 1 January 1942, was the basis of the modern UN (Douglas Brinkley, FDR & the Making of the U.N.). Hope that clears up this issue --Philip Baird Shearer 17:55, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: United Nations

message: Why didn't China sign the "Statement on Atrocities" part? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  16:46, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: China

message: The very last point about Churchill drafting much of the document is certainly not clear in the website attached. I'd go as far as saying this page is quite innaccurate on the Moscow Declatration - or is at least missing a lot of information. There is no reference here to Stalin's dislike towards to French and none about his logger-head approach to Churchill on some evening. This is confirmed in the link attached to the page.
Louis Williams  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.46.18.225 (talk) 15:54, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsure of this page
Talk:Tu Veneno

message: The redirect Natalia Oreiro Tu Veneno(2000 album) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Steel1943 (talk) 23:22, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Natalia Oreiro Tu Veneno(2000 album)]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]