Talk:Sodium–sulfur battery

message: __TOC__
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was move. -- tariqabjotu (joturner) 02:10, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

message: :Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
*Support, avoid abbreviations. --Dhartung | Talk 11:49, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: Which is the inert metal used in Sodium-sulfur batteries ?. --HybridBoy 13:28, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inert metal 

message: Unless I just missed it, it seems two important items are missing from the main article: Who invented it?  Patents?
Perhaps someone who either lives in or frequently visits Japan could take (or otherwise legally obtain) GFDL-copyright-compatible pictures of the installation referenced in the article.  In fact, an entire subsection of this article could be legitimately devoted to the topic.  (e.g.: How old is it?  Who built it for them?  Any maintenace problems so far?  Cost to build?  Cost to operate?  What will happen when it is time to retire the units?  Are they recyclable, or rebuildable?)
Are there any other installations?
Badly Bradley 15:51, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  A few suggestions to Greatly Improve the article 

message: This page uses incorrect units for capacity throughout most of the page. The capacity of a battery cannot be measured in KW or MW, because these are units of power, not of energy. The numbers quoted on this page are therefore mostly meaningless. Further research is required to find out what the correct units should have been: the most obvious possibilities being MWh or MJ. These differ in size by a factor of 3600, and so it is important to find out which one was intended.
--Kevin Cowtan (talk) 13:29, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confused units throughout 

message: MIT Professor Donald Sadoway is developing a liquid metal battery based on Magnesium / Antimony chemistry. See: http://www.ted.com/speakers/donald_sadoway.html  and http://www.ambri.com/
Because the term “liquid metal battery” redirects here, this alternative chemistry should be mentioned, or  “liquid metal battery” should present a disambiguation page. --Lbeaumont (talk) 01:40, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Magnesium / Antimony chemistry 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Sodium–sulfur battery. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110927211033/http://techon.nikkeibp.co.jp/article/HONSHI/20080924/158411/?P=3 to http://techon.nikkeibp.co.jp/article/HONSHI/20080924/158411/?P=3
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081203181413/http://www.greencar.com/features/features21/ to http://www.greencar.com/features/features21/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:55, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018) 

message: Have someone try to make a punctuation change that is obviously a correction. You will notice that 100% of the time it is auto reversed or undone by someone as being unnecessary or irrelevant. Any changes that you attempt to make no matter how simple are rejected. This system is broken. You need to use some sort of AI heuristics or something to determine if changes are reasonably relevant and applicable and quit allowing everybody to just delete other people's changes. It's time to come into the 2020s. 174.212.208.57 (talk) 15:44, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia doesn't work