lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Very Small Array

message: I've removed the following from the article:
:The Very Small Array was a humorous working name used in comparing it to the Very Large Array near Socorro, New Mexico, but in the end it stayed. Other potential early names for the array included the very British title Quite Small Array.
While a nice bit of information, I can't find a reference for it. If anyone can provide a ref for it, then it can go back on the article page.
Also, the external links:
* One of the first high-resolution images of the cosmic microwave background
* 2002 News report about the VSA
The first, while pretty, doesn't add anything more to the article than is already provided by the links to the Jodrell/Cambridge webpages on the VSA. The second is a fairly shallow news report, the content of which is given much better both in the article and in the journal references. Mike Peel 03:40, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed content from article 

message: Why is 2/3rds of the article in Past Tense and 1/3rd in Present Tense? 
IceDragon64 (talk) 01:14, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Past Tense? 

message: A gallery would do good for this article and enhance visualizing this array 2605:A601:A13D:2600:E532:339C:85F4:2661 (talk) 09:53, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gallery needed
Talk:Vibration isolation

message: This article needs to add a discussion about vibration isolation in general.  As it is written right now, it seems to give undue weight to NSM vibration isolation; it reads like an ad for Minus-K, and uses some figures of theirs.    — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oskay (talk • contribs) 23:50, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality/balance/content

message: I see no reason for the page Vibration-isolation to exist, it is merely a fork of this one. v-i is not an english expression. Greglocock (talk) 00:56, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I support the merge proposal, but I disagree that vibration-isolation can be characterised as a fork.  It contains entirely different material - none of it copy-pasted from here at a quick glance.  It therefore needs a proper merge rather than a simple blank and redirect as suggested by calling it a fork. SpinningSpark 08:38, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, sorry, the /title/ is a fork, the content is differnet. Actually the passive section of v_i needs expanding and much of v-i can be added into it. It does need rewriting, but that is no big deal, the images are useful. Greglocock (talk) 11:37, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal

message: :The theory of operation of NSM vibration isolation systems is summarized, some typical systems and applications are described, and data on measured performance is presented. The theory of NSM isolation systems is explained in References 1 and 2. It is summarize briefly for convenience.
Looks like the abstract of a scientific paper - Copy Vio ? --195.137.93.171 (talk) 01:18, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright SPIE ?
Talk:Owl's Head (Franconia, New Hampshire)

message: Couple of points:
1) The mountain doesn't really have a name.  Check GNIS or any official map:  "Owl's Head" refers to the bump at the southern end of the ridge, about a mile from the summit (that's a long distance for New England peaks).  The idea of calling the 4025' summit and/or the whole mountain "Owl's Head" apparently started with the AMC peak-bagging list.  It's never been official, and even the AMC's own maps don't use it consistently.  The summit is most properly known as "Unnamed Peak Above Owl's Head." One recent AMC map has coined the name "Owl's Head Mountain", which I think is an elegant solution.
2) The evidence is overwhelming that the 4025' true summit was at most *re*discovered.  All the old maps have it at the right spot, it's just that the trail, which was created by hikers following the AMC list, ended before reaching that spot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.232.182.67 (talk) 14:16, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Warm dark matter

message: Thanks to all the contributors to this article, it has now been translated in French.
Hop ! Kikuyu3 (talk) 18:13, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thanks 
Talk:List of parks in Ottawa

message: Britannia Park links to the wrong thing (a park in the UK)
There are 728 records in the open data portal that can be combed for parks includes name, size, etc
link data.ottawa.ca parks  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mkevlar (talk • contribs) 15:43, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Any feeling on whether this is considered a park? --Padraic 15:57, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Nepean Point]] 

message: There are a bunch of City of Ottawa parks that are all noticeably absent.  Conspiracy? I hope not.
Here are a few that I know of 
Clarence Maheral (formerly Pump House Park)
Rickey Place Park
Hope Cloutier Park
Frank McDonald Ball Park
Pdc50 (talk) 12:14, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The list is incomplete. Please feel free to add to it. -- Earl Andrew - talk 13:19, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kanata Parks
Talk:Wave propagation

message: It is stated in this article that:
The universal wave equation is:
:v=f\lambda=\frac{\lambda}{T}=\frac{\omega}{k}
With all the units beautifully clarified, however this is a dispersion relation; not a wave equation:
:v=f\lambda=\frac{\omega}{2 \pi}\frac{2 \pi}{k}=\frac{\omega}{k}
where v is the phase velocity.
The wave equation depends on the physics of the system being modelled.
Also, we must not forget that in a more dense material, EM waves travel slower than in a complete vaccum. I think this article needs major re-working, possibly starting with how a wave propagates. I'm going to work on something to expand this stub also (derivations of wave propogations). Possible candidates being - sound waves in a medium, waves on a guitar string and co-axial cable waves.
--Ukberry (talk) 13:56, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Technical Accuracy of Article - My Concerns 

message: I deleted the following paragraph from the article, because it is in general not correct: 
"Since classical information and quanta of energy is sent via wave packets (which must consist of a broad range of frequencies), the group velocity cannot ever be greater than the speed of light in a vacuum. This restriction does not apply to the phase velocity and so it can travel faster than the speed of light without violating the laws of special relativity."
In some circumstances, the group velocity can exceed the speed of light in vacuum, e.g. in a higly absorptive medium. This is possible because in general, the speed of the information is NOT equal to the group velocity. See, e.g. Dispersion_(optics). Sorry, I don't have time to rewrite it more accurately.
Nøk, (discussion) 131.220.167.159 (talk) 11:37, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Group velocity can be faster than c
Talk:Weber bar

message: Seriously? We're to believe that Weber made valid detections but that LIGO can't? 
I don't feel that the article represents anything approaching scientific consensus in the idea that his claims were valid.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.223.19.6 (talk) 22:22, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Re-asses his claims'?
Talk:Weyl transformation

message: Per WP:BRD and WP:EW, please discuss your edits to Weyl connection before you end up blocked. Chris Troutman (talk) 16:20, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Go ahead and block me.  Just leave me alone.  Tito Omburo (talk) 19:24, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weyl connection
Talk:Wigner's theorem

message: This page is unsatisfactory because it does not actually state the theorem in question; it just talks about it. John Baez (talk) 13:10, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

message: I rewrote it from scratch. I think about including a proof outline. Suggestions (and corrections and additions) are most welcome. YohanN7 (talk) 08:13, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite 

message: I have somewhat advanced plans on including a detailed proof, specifically Bargmann's proof. The rationale is as follows:
*Since the theorem is of fundamental importance, its proof is not automatically out of place, in spite of it being longer than one line.
*The theorem was left unproved for over 30 years in the eyes of some (but perhaps not in the eyes of Wigner and Bargmann).
*Bargmann wrote the proof (he essentially spelled out Wigner's original proof in detail) perhaps mostly due to his frustration over fellow researchers indicating that proof of the theorem requires heavy machinery.
*The theorem was proved in painful detail by very elementary means, meaning that it is accessible to most visitors of this page. Senior high school mathematics suffices!
I think that the four bullets outweigh that Wikipedia doesn't usually include mathematical proofs. The proof is notable in the very sense of Wikipedia's use of the term, and is also described as such in several of the sources I have read. YohanN7 (talk) 13:28, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proof
Talk:Single-grain experiment

message: Is "Single-grain experiment" should have a capital at its the beginning? I've changed it for now. Michaelas10 (T|C) 21:40, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: I think the opening paragraph should give a one-sentence summary of what the experiment actually was. AdamBiswanger1 20:40, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Opening paragraph

message: This article says Dean Henry wouldn't agree, then later says Henry (now a Dean) relented. This needs to be fixed.
Liastnir 13:30, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dean when?
Talk:Mount Washington Auto Road

message: Most of this entry should be from the cd that is given out at the base of the mountain. If I can find my coppy, I will procede to edit it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.193.129.99 (talk) 03:26, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: As the Auto Road is privately owned (https://mountwashington.org/the-mount-washington-auto-road/) should this be clearly noted in the summary and the article removed from the New Hampshire Highway System category which describes itself as the public roadway system in New Hampshire? Overturn 91 (talk) 00:36, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ownership of Road
Talk:I Love You Baby (2001 film)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) The Night Watch (talk) 19:48, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 11 February 2023
Talk:Sticker art

message: A subcategory on sticker poetry would be good. Or a mention of it. Kevin Doran 13:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sticker Poetry

message: the site dislays a majority of stickers, to be used in a variety of locations:
http://www.mixthemessage.com/epages/Store3_Shop2472.sf
and thereby I believe being quite unique, surely needing to be added to a section on sticker art is a website about sticker art  —Preceding unsigned comment added by I'mvominit (talk • contribs) 15:12, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: pure sticker art

message: This section is currently a list, entries are constantly being added without references. (see WP:TRUTH) Could someone write some prose with references to replace this easily abused list? Grim23★ 21:36, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable sticker artists and campaigns section 

message: www.stickertrading.com is closed, so this needs an edit or a new link. Dan Bollinger (talk) 14:16, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  defunct link 
Talk:Saint-Eustache, Quebec

message: The battle of Saint-Eustache was opposing the Patiots, led by Doctor Chenier and the British troops, occupying Lower Canada at the time. The battle was not balanced where the British circled the few Patriots remaining taking cover in the Church (located on the shores of "riviere des milles isles". The british army set the church on fire after shooting cannon balls at the front wall (still visible today). The Patriots surrendered and were shot, hung and displayed in the village to scare the population about standing up against assimilation of french culture in Quebec to British imposed culture. There is a famous case that took place in the last night of the battle where a french teenager, not involved in the rebellion, was standing on the porch of his parents house and was shot by a British soldier for absolutely no reason. The case went to trial and was turned in favor of the british.
In a way, this unknown history fascinates americans. French speaking people left in Lower Canada by the French (France) had to find ways to protect their culture (still fighting today). Had Saint-Eustache been located closer to America, a sense of protection might have occured.
In this year, 1837, other battles took place (St-Denis, St-Charles - along the Richelieu river on the south shore of Montreal). British had weapons and troops and could crush any resistance. The army was cruel and without mercy. 
Many quebecers feel today the need to separate from the English Commonwealth. Separation would be an answer to the events of 1837, where fathers of the quebec culture were assaninated.
Tourists are invited to visit Saint-Eustache to view the Church and what British troops did to it. When touching the walls of the church, people can still feel vibes of this famous night of 1837.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.216.61.102 (talk) 16:37, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:XENON

message: essendo un quotato critico della fisica moderna mi sono sempre ispirato alla massima autorita' nel campo  della materia oscura vale a dire niente di meno che sua santitata' darkman chi e' che non conosce darkman. Con cio ribadisco a tutti gli appassionati che il giorno 11 novembre 2015 siete tutti invitati al gran sasso presso L'Aquila esperimento xenon se non vi fanno entrare chiedete pur tranquillamente di paolo aprile , e alla fine dell'innaugurazione ci sara un rinfresco nella vicina autogrill a pochi chilometri direzione roma, siete pregati di rimanere le vostre previsione pauli wolfgan si wolfgan no per quanto riguarda l'atterraggio della della materia a canto al proettore di ologrammi installato al piano terra chiaramente dopo aver visitato il piano 1 e 2 vi aspetto. 
oggi 29/06/2015
it is not a noble gas whatsoever
 98.252.150.236 (talk) 17:46, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Couldn't the lead mention why xenon is used? If it's because, "Electrons in liquid xenon have a uniform drift velocity.", and that's important, then shouldn't something like that be in the lead?  UnderEducatedGeezer (talk) 06:44, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uh, why xenon? 

message: The Collaborating Institutions section is just a long list of universities. Is this relevant information? Would anyone who doesn't work for those universities care?Sbierwagen (talk) 01:41, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Institutions 

message: — Assignment last updated by Amelia.binau (talk) 17:19, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Astroparticle Physics
Talk:Richard Foss

message: I'm surprised I even have to defend this article. It's not a vanity article. I'm not him and don't know him. The omission appeared obvious. Richard Foss is a published science fiction author, and Wikipedia is generally fairly comprehensive in referencing such. A web search will turn up fairly numerous references to him in most if not all of his occupations. I discovered he did not have an article when I created the article for The Enchanter Completed: A Tribute Anthology for L. Sprague de Camp, a book containing one of his works, from which all the other contributing authors did have articles. Keep the thing. I and I'm sure others will build on it. BPK 21:48, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Defense of article in response to speedy deletion tag 

message: It might be questionable whether only one SS in Analog is enough to warrant an entry.  But speedy delete?  No way.  Besides, the story was an award nominee.  This alone is enough for me to have an article on the guy.Kdammers 23:40, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-instate article
Talk:Ataşehir

message: As stated in the topic, this photograph is not of Ataşehir, and is therefore unrepresentative of the topic. 171.66.12.226 (talk) 22:40, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed the picture as it was added by a blocked sockpuppet Shadow4dark (talk) 02:43, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  IFC (The Preview Picture) is not in Ataşehir
Talk:Fatih

message: The article rambles off topic (a municipal district) to provide confused summations of history (often out of section context) of the development of the old city of Constantinople, and does so laced with subjective qualifiers.   Much of the article needs to be recompiled, drafted, or junked.Mavigogun (talk) 05:10, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Absolutely agree (actually I wrote the same sometime ago...) By the way, this article deals with the old Fatih, before the incorporation of Eminönü... Go ahead! Cheers, Alex2006 (talk) 05:35, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bloated, Redundant 

message: Many of the pages for Istanbul suffer from the same problem which is that they conflate two completely different things - the specific neighbourhood with the name and the wider district with the same name. Also true, for example, of Beykoz and Üsküdar. In each case there needs to be a disambiguation page leading a) to the area withe the name and b) the district with the same name. I can easily sort this out once I'm allowed to make pages myself and not just correct the existing ones. Until then it is almost impossible to improve pages like this. I'm British so I'll compare it to conflating for example, Stafford with Staffordshire, or Hereford with Herefordshire. But I live in Turkey now so the distinctions are perfectly clear to me.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ealinggirl1954 (talk • contribs) 19:41, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need to separate out Fatih, the local area, from Fatih the adinistrative district
Talk:Küçükçekmece

message: I came across this article when I found a W icon in the middle of the sea off the coast of Romania in Google Maps. I removed this bogosity...  ... richi (hello) 14:58, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Coordintes wrong

message: Lütfen arkadaşlar burayı dünya okuyor, ne demektir "much crime in dirty streets where men gather in badly lit cafes to play cards, drink tea and smoke cheap cigarettes" yahu? Adamın cebine para koysan, git Türkiyeyi kötüle desen o da nihayetinde bunu yapar...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sabun (talk • contribs) 14:41, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bu sayfadaki bilgiler kasıtlı mı ?
Talk:Himalaya with Michael Palin

message: The edit history of this article is to be found in the redirecting page Himalaya: Michael Palin. Hoverfish 22:02, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit history

message: There was some concern I believe at the portrayal of Tibet, in particular the degree of (or lack of) religious freedom.  It's summed up in this letter on Free Tibet:
http://www.freetibet.org/press/himalaya/palinletter.html
Is this worth mentioning in the main article?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.142.7.219 (talk) 12:15, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Portrayal of Tibet
Talk:Yariguies Brush-finch

message: * Set up merge request. Reasons: Yariguies Brush Finch was the first article, it is better structured, and while non-US convention is to hyphenate composite vernaculars, the correct version as per HBW SOP would be "Yariguies Brush-finch" anyway. Dysmorodrepanis 22:04, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: hi,
i had a bot remove my shared AP photo (that CNN, NYtimes, etc. all have used) because they did not like my source info.  however, this is clearly a rare species in an obscure part of the world.  how in the heck are we supposed to obtain a legit photo for this topic???
:You might try asking tdonegan@proaves.org or b.huertas@nhm.ac.uk whether they'd be willing to give one out to put on the Commons under CC-2.5-SA-BY. That way, all Wikipedians could use it. Dysmorodrepanis 22:23, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Have added an illustration in response to request on my talk page. I am not very familiar with South American Atlapetes finches, so please let me know if any modifications are needed in the illustration. Shyamal 04:49, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  how can we have a legitimate pic to accompany this article?
Talk:Eric Olsen (writer)

message: I'm still working on this page.  Need to get more biographical info (like date of birth) and will add to the 'significance' if needed.  No question Eric Olsen should have an entry.  He has the largest and most diverse group blogs/magazines on the web.  His site - blogcritics - has a higher Alexa ranking than Instapundit, and deserves and entry here as much as Glenn Reynolds does, certainly.
==
OK, but must it read so suspiciously like a resume? --68.4.32.233 10:46, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:AlltheWeb

message: Hi kids, the Mighty Obbop here. I use Alltheweb.com for picture searching. It is my belief that the results are better than the Google pic search. But, something seems to be going on. Clcik on www.alltheweb.com and a redirect leads to here: http://livesearch.alltheweb.com/
Is the old Alltheweb gone? I hope not!!!!! Obbop the Mighty told yah' this. 209.50.1.94 22:43, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

message: Does anyone know why any search on AllTheWeb that includes the word “mail” results in a page saying “Sorry Gone” and no search results?
I've been using AllTheWeb for at least 10 years now and still prefer it over any other (not that I've really given others a try).  However, the above "Sorry Gone" comment is what brought me to this site as I was searching for more information too.  I did report it to AllTheWeb many years ago, but apparently they don't care.  I just discovered today the "Sorry Gone" message appears when searching on the word "reply" as well.  This is actually becoming a pain when having to search for email issues.  I really, really wish they'd fix it!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.105.3.11 (talk) 17:19, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sorry Gone! 

message: Didn't alltheweb used to have a cool audio search? When was it dropped? Around 2005? Was it after yahoo! bought it? Or did it have to do with post-Napster copyright questions?
--Escier (talk) 20:49, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Drop of audio search? 
Talk:Tripartisme

message: What is the basis for calling this either "The Three-parties alliance" or "Three-parties", both of which strike me as very odd English? - Jmabel | Talk 22:44, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: 1. I assume it has been written by a non-native English speaker (probably French), as there are some rather odd turns of phrase.
2. More seriously, no citations/references whatsoever.
WikiReaderer (talk) 23:09, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problems with the article... 

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
*Support This seems to be a forced, artificial translation. I notice other editors opposed to the title in the first section on the page. A quick search for  suggests no one else is using this term (or at least that it's ambiguous). --BDD (talk) 18:14, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey