Talk:Michelle Tea

message: :Image:Michellteasmile.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 11:12, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Michellteasmile.jpg

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Michelle Tea. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080724153633/http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA318539.html to http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA318539.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100131083143/http://www.lambdaliterary.org:80/awards/previous_winners/paw_2004_2006.html to http://www.lambdaliterary.org/awards/previous_winners/paw_2004_2006.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:11, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Why is she categorized as a prostitute (in this article and in the Commons gallery)? The article only implies she writes about prostitution. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 13:37, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Good question. I removed the category as I could find no evidence in the article's text our sourcing that this was an appropriate description. Safehaven86 (talk) 02:58, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. I was about to do the same. Meters (talk) 03:00, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Did a bit more digging, and turned up this SF Gate source. It says: "Novelist Michelle Tea wears her difficult past like one of her multicolored tattoos: It may have caused her pain, but now she can point to the rather dazzling results. The onetime prostitute and drug abuser smiles with the radiance of Miss America as she greets participants of her monthly Radar Reading series at San Francisco's Main Library." So it appears she's written about being a prostitute in her memoirs. But this source, and a discussion of her past as a prostitute, doesn't appear to be in the article yet. It doesn't make sense (or comply with WP:BLP) to have the category without the corroboration in the text. Safehaven86 (talk) 03:03, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: That would seem to be a reliable source, quoting the author herself, if anyone wants to add it. I'm not going to do it. Meters (talk) 03:11, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Prostitute?

message: I fixed a couple issues and moved stuff around, but this entry could really use a more thorough edit. It's out of date (Tea now lives in Los Angeles; other than a brief cite there's no discussion of her newest book Black Wave and no mention of her work with the Feminist Press) and poorly organized. "Recent work" starts with an entry about something she did in 2003, over 15 years ago. "Academics" is pretty thin.  There's nothing on her books, only "spoken word and magazine writing," and that section is pretty scattershot too. 
It might make more sense to organize it as books, editorial/curatorial work (RADAR, Sister Spit tour and imprint, Amethyst Editions/Feminist Press imprint, MUTHA Magazine), and other work, including the XOJane column and the Valencia movie. Other ideas welcome, though. I am a small anonymous editor and I don't have time or spoons to do this right.2601:643:8005:8140:45F:A889:D763:3A98 (talk) 21:52, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Out of date, needs a clean-up edit 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Michelle Tea. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100424192346/http://www.afterellen.com/archive/ellen/People/michelletea-interview.html to http://www.afterellen.com/archive/ellen/People/michelletea-interview.html
*Added archive https://archive.is/20131030095952/http://www.radarproductions.org/valencia-the-movies/ to http://www.radarproductions.org/valencia-the-movies/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:26, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018)