Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Norse history and culture

message: Dear Norse fans, 
I noticed that your project page has a rather out-dated list of recognised content. To get it up-to-date all you need to do is post

into the relevant section and the kind bot will fill it in and keep it up-to-date. If you want to see what it looks like, the most recent bot update is here, which page I will keep intact for a week or so for you. Ben MacDui 19:06, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Free gift of recognised content lists 

message: Hi all, I'm looking for collaborators on improving the articles on the heroic figures from the Nibelungen/Volsung legend. I've already significantly expanded the articles for Sigurd and Brunhild, and am almost "done" with Gudrun. I don't know the Norse material all that well though, as I'm mostly familiar with the Middle High German traditions and scholarship. For this reason none of these articles contain a summary of their character in the Norna-Gests þáttr, for instance, because I just don't know where to look for that information. My sources on Germanic heroic traditions usually just dismiss it as late and contain the barest summary.
Anyway, I'm starting to run out of steam, even though Hagen (legend) and Gunther are two obvious priorities. I'm also committed to rewriting the article Nibelung, which shouldn't be as tedious as summarizing all of the texts in which, for instance, Gudrun/Kriemhild appears. I'd like to put together a page on Germanic heroic legend in general in the future; such a page is currently missing on Wikipedia. I'll have to scale back my activities here soon though, as I'm starting a new job in August and I might not have much library access from mid-July to August 16. I'm very grateful for whatever help anyone can give me.--Ermenrich (talk) 18:27, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Looking for collaborators on heroic figures 

message: I've started working on a revision of the (pretty terrible) legends section over at Huns in my sandbox. Anyone interested is welcome to participate, and also participate in the discussion over at Talk:Huns.--Ermenrich (talk) 22:39, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  started work on a revision of the legends section of [[Huns]] 

message: T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk 09:36, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiJournal of Humanities published first article  

message: As some of the articles involved in this discussion (WP:VPIL#What to do about OMACL links?) involve the topic of this Wikiproject, I'd appreciate any help or input y'all might have. -- Finlay McWalter··–·Talk 18:18, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  What to do about OMACL links? 

message: Please see: Talk:Kildin Sami orthography#Requested move 21 December 2018 – multi-page RM primarily about diacritics in an endonym.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  19:22, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sámi vs. Sami vs. Saami 

message: Please see Dan (king).  I had thought about submitting to WP:AfD, but I figured it is better to let those who know the sourcing to do something about it first.  --David Tornheim (talk) 10:55, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dan (king) -- completely unsourced for almost 10 years 

message: Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for information on WP1.0 web tool 

message: I have nominated Battle of Svolder for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm  Bacon 02:11, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  FAR notice 

message: I'm pleased to report that the article Germanic heroic legend is now live! Please help in adding links from appropriate articles dealing with Germanic heroic legends.--Ermenrich (talk) 15:11, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Germanic heroic legend 

message: A RfC has been opened at Talk:Odal_(rune)#RfC_CPAC_stage_Odal_shape.  The question is, "Should the article mention the that some sources noted the CPAC stage had an appearance similar to a Odal?". Springee (talk) 03:35, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfC CPAC stage Odal shape - at [[Odal_(rune)]] article 

message: I have nominated Sviatoslav I for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm  Talk 23:41, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  FAR notice 

message: Maybe somebody would like to add a rating to Germanic heroic legend for this project?--Ermenrich (talk) 13:35, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rating for Germanic heroic legend 

message: Hello friends! WP:Medievalwiki is holding an open session tomorrow - Wikimania's Unconference on Monday 16 August at 12pm (UTC). We'd love to chat to more medieval wikipedians! Lajmmoore (talk) 20:08, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikimania 

message: Please comment at Talk:Earl#Split article? to give your opinion on whether text on the Scandinavian jarl should be moved to Jarl (title), which currently redirects to Earl. Thanks. Ltwin (talk) 01:56, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should Earl and Jarl be split? 

message: There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Auðr (mythological character)#Requested move 21 August 2022 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. – robertsky (talk) 00:50, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move at [[Talk:Auðr (mythological character)#Requested move 21 August 2022]] 

message: Quality assessments by Wikipedia editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a  parameter to , which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.
No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to , and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.
However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass  a new  parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 17:31, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Project-independent quality assessments 

message: The redirect Danish America has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  -- 65.92.247.66 (talk) 23:34, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Danish America]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: There is a requested move discussion at Talk:House of Bjelbo#Requested move 27 May 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 12:16, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move at [[Talk:House of Bjelbo#Requested move 27 May 2024]] 

message: There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Philip of Sweden#Requested move 29 May 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 01:08, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move at [[Talk:Philip of Sweden#Requested move 29 May 2024]]