Talk:Fishing industry

message: Removed cfdnotice, cfd has completed. --Kbdank71 17:28, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Overridden. Deletion was handled by underqualified wikipedians. No big deal, fortunately; this is the power of wikipedia: errors will eventually be fixed. `'Miikka 00:20, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: notes

message: The External Links section is getting abused. Before its too late, I would like to propose on checking these section. Or most probably, I'll put it on my To Do List. Bu b0y2007 06:16, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: External links

message: Fish factory redirect needed. I failed to quickly find any fish processing wikipedia articles. Please do something. Please  do not redirect to Fish industry without expanding the latter, because such redirect will be more harmful than useful by hiding the missing topic. `'Miikka 23:18, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK. I decided to handle it myself, since it seems like there is a mess now. True fishermen catch fish. Those who cannot catch fish, teach others how to catch fish. Those who cannot teach how to catch, write wikipedia article. `'Miikka 00:22, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fish factory

message: :Image:Pyat rublei 1997.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 11:27, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Pyat rublei 1997.jpg

message: There is an editing conflict going on with Geronimo20 regarding the use of the same image twice in this article (see discussion here, also here and on my talk page). - Wikigi | talk to me | 14:06, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Dispute resolved - Wikigi | talk to me | 12:37, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: Is it just me, or doesn't the inclusion of "traditional fishing" in an article that is supposed to deal with a global industry appear slightly misplaced here? One could even speculate that we are dealing with a particularly silly case of romanticization in order to play down the scope of what we are really talking about. For me, at any rate, this is highly irritating. -- Kku (talk) 10:43, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "traditional sector" 

message: Could we make it clearer already in the lead of this article how it is related to the fishery article? I see a bit of overlap between the two articles. It would be good to make them match together like a puzzle piece. Is the fishing industry article regarded as a sub-article to fishery? EMsmile (talk) 14:31, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relationship with [[fishery]] 

message: I see the FAO has chosen to include something they call recreational in "fishing industry". This has got the article into quite a tangle, as we sensibly distinguish industry from recreational angling (but we weirdly have a separate article on Commercial fishing, what is that about? Sounds like a merger would be in order there), and have carefully NOT talked about recreational in this article. But ... 
The only sense I can make of this mess is that when John Doe goes out for a nice relaxing day alone by the river with his rod, that's pure recreation, definitely not industrial fishing, so out of scope of this article. But when he goes down the angling shop and buys his gear, he's making use of a branch of the industry that supplies fishing equipment. And when he goes out on a luxury boat to chase after tuna in the ocean, he's again using a branch of the industry that profits from recreational/sport fishing. 
So, this article needs a section on recreational fishery to match the slightly surprising FAO definition. Chiswick Chap (talk) 05:52, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Includes recreational fishery ...