lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Matalan

message: For full disclosure, I work at Matalan. I noticed there are a number of factual inaccuracies on the Matalan Wikipedia page and wanted to suggest that these are corrected in order for the page to be true and factual. This includes inaccuracies related to the following sections of the page: 1) the first paragraph of the overview; and 2) the “structure” section, due to their statement that the Hargreaves family are still the owner of the company, which is no longer true (source; source). Similarly, the “Management” section does not make clear there is a new Chairperson (source) and includes executives who are no longer with the company following a number of management changes (source; source: source: source). Finally, the number of stores cited in the overview section of the page is out of date (source). With those points in mind, in order to be true and factual, you may also feel it is necessary to update the “History” section of the page to reflect the latest developments. 2024-KP (talk) 12:38, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page inaccuracies
Talk:William Radford

message: This article deserves an image of the subject in question. This is to improve the quality of this article. Any addition of images would be most welcomed. --Siva1979Talk to me 19:20, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Image needed

message: This article misses key family detail in that William was step-son to William Clark (explorer), was related (step-cousin, brother-in-law) to two military Generals.  I propose to add this information with documentation in the near future. Seblake (talk) 16:48, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional detail
Talk:Void (band)

message: I substantially cleaned up the page, making it closer to Wikipedia guidelines, and added a little bit of information.  Can anyone provide any information on the Condensed Flesh release in 1992 - whether it was an official release or a bootleg? Chris Berry 19:23, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm fairly sure it was pressed with the band's blessing, but I can't verify it and their recordings have been heavily bootlegged anyway... Also, a couple of things in this article aren't really backed up elsewhere; according to the 20 Years Of Dischord booklet they disbanded in '84, essentially abandoning the sessions for 'Potion...' whereas the article asserts 1983 without citing a source. I've seen bootleg live recordings on Soulseek labelled for 1984 too, so I'm particularly suspicious of that. Also the Touch & Go bit needs to be clarified - who did they talk to? Was it in a zine? I'm not a citation bureaucrat by any means, but I'd like to know if this stuff has any real basis before making any major edits. Chris 00:05, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

message: Citation 1 at http://www.dischord.com/news/215 is completely unrelated to what it is attached to. Can anyone who has experience with this subject perhaps volunteer to find another reference (or just remove this one)?
Meltingwax (talk) 06:56, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation seemingly irrelevant
Talk:Friedrich Olbricht

message: Some sources seem to suggest that Friedrich Olbricht's rank in the army was that of Colonel General, and not merely General of the Infantry (one rank lower).  Was Olbricht's promotion to the rank of General of the Infantry in 1940 his last promotion, or did he get promoted later on (to the rank of Colonel general)? --L.Smithfield (talk) 16:22, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  What was his rank? 

message: Moving here for storage as this content is incited since 2010 and the subject is not mentioned in the linked article on the affair:
*Olbricht was one of few German military officers who supported the democratic Weimar Republic. His mistrust of the Nazis became apparent early on, particularly after the Beer Hall Putsch in 1923, when he stood together with Hans Oster, Erwin von Witzleben and Georg Thomas, who all distanced themselves from the growing National Socialist movement, worried as they were at the allure that the Nazis seemed to have for a lot of military men.
*In 1935, Olbricht was appointed chief of staff of the Fourth Army Corps stationed in Dresden. In 1938, he took over leadership of the 24th Infantry Division. That same year, he unsuccessfully advocated the rehabilitation of Werner von Fritsch, who had been disgraced as a result of an accusation of homosexuality (see Blomberg-Fritsch Affair).
K.e.coffman (talk) 19:06, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uncited content 

message: "Adolf Hitler and his commanders in the Wolfsschanze were able to broadcast a speech after the coup which in turn led to the quick demise of the coup as a whole."
Nonsense. Hitler's speech was broadcast after midnight (see Kershaw and most other literature), the coup had failed hours before. But radio did broadcast newsflashes that Hitler had survived a coup attempt. 2A02:AA1:1629:1926:BCDF:15E0:8258:CF3F (talk) 11:13, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timeline
Talk:Bendlerblock

message: According to this: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,347833,00.html , Cruise was allowed to film. The article is not clear on this. Proxy User (talk) 16:21, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tom Cruise movie Valkyrie 
Talk:The Afghan Whigs

message: An article on The Afghan Whigs in the Seattle Weekly (the article thru which I first learned about them) stated that Sub-Pop learned about them from one of their bands, who discovered them playing in an Ohio bar. Anyone else heard this story? Does anyone else know which band that was? (No, it was not Nirvana -- I would have remembered that.) -- llywrch 19:34, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sub Pop
Talk:Radio-controlled boat

message: I removed the detailed information about racing classes in the UK.  This might be a good subject for a separate article, but not for the overview of radio controlled boats.  Also removed the sentance about tethered racing as it is not relevant to the radio control boat subject. Seaphoto 03:15, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Racing Classes 

message: From Footy (model yacht) Kkmurray 04:07, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I can see a time when the article will need to be branched into sub categories (such as radio-controlled submarine.  For now, I would leave that article where it is, but put a link to it. Seaphoto 06:37, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

text: It is already linked in the "See Also" section.  I would not integrate it, as not all Model Yachts are radio controlled. Seaphoto 16:45, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe Footy (model yacht) should be integrated with Model_yachting#Radio_control.--Kkmurray 00:44, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Suggestion 

message: I am noticing the links section of the page is growing, with a lot of local clubs added.  I know that Wikipedia is not a collection of links, but perhaps if it gets to a certain size an article called List of Radio Control Model Boat clubs should be started and the majority moved there?  Or should we cull out all but national organizations, if even those?  Your thoughts? Seaphoto 03:57, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proliferation of Club Links
Talk:List of top international men's football goal scorers by country

message: He has scored 16 goals not 17. 2001:4645:B0B3:0:AD8A:D33C:E87E:1CD9 (talk) 08:07, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oday Dabbagh 

message: the list is missing the famous german striker Gerd Müller. You should add him too. 195.243.250.198 (talk) 12:10, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gerd Müller
Talk:Biorhexistasy

message: Does anyone know what language "rhexein" would be? - Jmabel | Talk 19:48, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "From rhexein" 
Talk:Jay R. Vargas

message: B-class on account of inclusion of picture, Medal of Honor citation, and various other extras. But the main core of the prose content is quite short. This is a bit more than "a good start", but I would suggest further expansion before nominating this for GA or A-class. LordAmeth 21:16, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: WP:MILHIST Assessment
Talk:Figaro (character in operas and plays)

message: I have moved this information to the Marriage of Figaro page as previously proposed. - Kleinzach 19:59, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional note on "''The Marriage of Figaro''"

message: I've removed this, as previously proposed, intending to put this information in The Barber of Seville page however, the latter has a long synopsis which obviates any extra additions. Everything here was effectively duplicated.  Kleinzach 14:05, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Section: The Barber of Seville

message: I've removed this, as previously proposed, intending to put this information in The Marriage of Figaro page however, the latter has a long synopsis which obviates any extra additions. Everything here was effectively duplicated. - Kleinzach 14:15, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Section: The Marriage of Figaro

message: This information already exists on the The Barber of Seville page, so I have removed it from here. - Kleinzach 23:00, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional information
Talk:The 2i's Coffee Bar

message: I removed an incorrect statement about The Second 2i's Club at 44 Gerrard Street. A club was located at that location in 1956, but it was called Fourty-Four Skiffle & Folksong Club, and its connection, if any, to Lincoln is unclear. This information is sourced from the book Roots of the Revival and from the Guardian. If anyone has further info, please add or correct. Noralambert (talk) 15:52, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: This page name is wrong - it should be the 2i's NOT 2I's. Thanks. Vera, Chuck & Dave 14:26, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I wrote a lengthy two-part article, based on literally months of research at the British Library and interviews, on the 2i's. It was published in Record Collector January and February 2007 editions, but it is not available through them online. However, I have published the full unedited version online at MySpace. If you google my name and MySpace, you should find the link. But it seems MySpace links are blacklisted, so I can't add it here. 
If anyone is willing to rake through the material I amassed and extend this entry, then fantastic, please feel free (I'd rather not do it myself, though I'd appreciate a credit somewhere!)
Thanks
Owen71 12:06, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major article available if someone can help me get it on Wikipedia 

message: "Did you know that !Little Richard` was refused a `set` by Paul! he said go dye you hair pink or something and may consider you! So he went out and did just that - then got a platform gig."
Although this is interesting, it needs to be verified with a reference and re-written in a neutral tone. SteveRamone 04:37, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Interesting, but needs a reference and NPOV
Talk:Iqbal Sacranie

message: I have jus updated this page and made it as neutral as possible!!
--Blueee 15:52, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is just way too much details for somebody who is not a major figure. I edited the Achivement section to include only major items.
Sgmiller 20:09, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed Excessive Detail
Talk:Communist Party of Spain (Reconstituted)

message: According to the FAS, this group had only a few dozen members, as of 2003. An organization that small can hardly be said to have both a "political wing" and a "military wing": it's clearly just one tiny group of people (tinier still, after recent arrests ), and GRAPO and the PCE(r) are clearly a single entity.  -- Karada 20:15, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:First of October Anti-Fascist Resistance Groups

message: According to the FAS, this group had only a few dozen members, as of 2003. An organization that small can hardly be said to have both a "political wing" and a "military wing": it's clearly just one tiny group of people (tinier still, after recent arrests ), and GRAPO and the PCE(r) are clearly a single entity.  -- Karada 20:16, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The articles ought to be separate. All claims as to the size of clandestine organizations might be disputed, but 2003 numbers cannot be the defining issue. GRAPO did play a role during the latter years of the Franco regime, and the PCE(r) and GRAPO are both significant to have separate articles. --Soman 12:02, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: This article is an aberration. All sources are hostile to the subject, the language is biased, there is much SYNTH and OR speculation, soem of the claims are not verifiable, and terms such as "band" are clearly not neutral. Perhpas only the few lines in the intro are neutraly presented, but then they are not sourced... can't win! We surely can make a better job of this world shattering topic. ;) Thanks! --Cerejota (talk) 03:07, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Total neutrality failure... 

message: It is not a maoist group.
this is much more acurate:
Comunismo, socialismo marxismo-leninismo, antirrevisionismo
For doing this crap it is better to copy&paste the spanish one  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.120.36.244 (talk) 12:31, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Maoist]] group 

message: The link sourcing GRAPO being labeled as terrorist according to The UE does, not work. A valid link must be found or the mention withdrawn.--Lembeye (talk) 18:45, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[List of designated terrorist groups]]
Talk:Girl Authority

message: Just a note to say that I have removed some [or an] image[s] from the page beacuse they were speediable under either:
*Category:Images with no fair use rationale
*Category:Images with no copyright tag
*Category:Images with no source
Or similar category. Iolakana|(talk) 15:51, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed deleted image(s)

message: What do Lynx and Lamb Gaede have to do with Girl Authority? Can someone enlighten me for a sec? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 134.241.58.253 (talk) 14:51, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion 

message: This article sounds like it was written by a fan 24.63.3.115 14:04, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV? 
Talk:The Company (Prison Break)

message: Isn't it "The Firm"? Psychomelodic (people think  edit)
:"The Company" was never referred to as "The Firm" in any of the episodes. Ladida 04:23, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Alternate name - The Firm

message: Why are Secret Service agents listed as working for the company?  Even Bill Kim is listed even though he works for President Reynolds who severed all ties to the Company after she killed Presedent Miller, and Kim worked for Reynolds after she stoped working for the company. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DanDud88 (talk • contribs) 17:29, 24 November 2006
:. -- Ladida 01:28, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Secret Service

message: In reality, "The Company" is the unofficial name given to the Central Intelligence Agency.
The above true? a ref maybe? Hanfresco 09:07, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  True? 

message: Well, after the tons of deletions, this article is worth to keep?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.211.51.62 (talk) 00:37, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notabilty
Talk:Emergence International

message: This page currently has no references (including further reading, although I don't have access to the Stores source) that actually mention the Emergence International organization, just homosexuality and Christian Science in general, and I can't find anything online besides their own website that has anything other than vague mentions of the organization; but rather than deleting the page as not notable, I propose that this page be moved to Homosexuality and Christian Science which doesn't exist yet. That way the page history can be saved and more on the topic can be added. Relinus (talk) 06:33, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed page move
Talk:Brian Lawton

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  MLauba (talk) 12:55, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:List of tallest buildings in New York City

message: Just an idea 65.175.106.2 (talk) 00:54, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: That would take a lot of effort. And every time an updated photo is added all the work would have to be redone. 71.62.176.24 (talk) 19:36, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Make Images Clickable 

message: I would like to add a section about the timeline, as the first construction boom in the 1930s came to a halt during the 1940s and 1950s, with the second boom in the late 1960s and early 1970s, and the current boom occuring as of 2022. But I need sources. Jishiboka1 (talk) 08:38, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Already covered in the history section 38.93.246.202 (talk) 03:19, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section about history of construction 

message: In the main list you omit One Manhattan West, which should appear as #16. Oddly enough, you include this tower in the list further down, titled "Tallest Building by Pinnicle", you have it listed as #18. I'm also still puzzled as to why it's #18 in that list and not #17 with the addition of 4 Times Square? Something doesn't add up? 2603:7000:BE01:D600:AD22:970:85E0:6EF2 (talk) 15:58, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I think I fixed it. 38.93.246.202 (talk) 16:41, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  One Manhattan West Missing in Main List 

message: Why is Empire State Building listed by roof height and not total height? It should be fourth tallest to be consistent with how other buildings on this list are measured. Pfotsch (talk) 15:03, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: U are correct but it will take too long to fix the whole list to pinnacle height 2607:FEA8:FDC0:8179:60D1:9A25:F2A1:FB3A (talk) 19:01, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: You are getting pinnacle and architectural height confused. The architectural height of the ESB is 1,250 ft, and for 1WTC is 1,776 ft. Presently, as of 2024, pinnacle height for the ESB is 1,454 ft, and for 1WTC is 1,792 ft. Pinnacle height includes  antennas and other elements that can be swapped or added/removed. The ESB's antenna has been previously swapped out as prior to 1985 it was instead 1,472 ft to its pinnacle. Whereas architectural height includes permanent elements of the skyscraper only. In short only architectural height is used, and the permanent spires of the BOA Tower and 1WTC are just a larger percentage of their height. Previously roof-height was sometimes used instead to avoid this confusion, however skyscrapers, such as he Burj Khalifa, have no clear delineation as to where the roof ends and the spire begins, and so that has largely fallen out of favor. Height to highest usable floor is still in widespread use however. 71.62.176.24 (talk) 19:33, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Empire State Building
Talk:Return to the Sea

message: The painting 'Sea of Ice' is on wikipedia on the artist's page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.57.127.10 (talk • contribs) 20:50, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled 1

message: I've seen the hidden track named various things.  "Bucky Little Wing", "Renaud", and "Untitled".  Are we sure Bucky Little Wing is the official name? Arsi 20:51, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled2
Talk:International Arabian Horse Association

message: This was recently deleted; should it remain?
2 Resignation of Brown
Brown volunteered to resign after controversy about his fundraising methods for defending against the lawsuits. Some of the lawsuits named him as a defendant, while others named the association, or both.
Brown claimed to be getting a lot of money for a defense fund for the organization. However he was also getting a lot of money for his own personal legal defense fund at the same time. On top of that, the money for the organization's defense fund never actually came in. This caused a big ruckus amongst the board of directors and so at the meeting where this all came out, he volunteered to resign.
This is all documented in an interview with members of the 'executive committee' of the association, in Arabian Horse World online (3).''
CoolGuy 20:55, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleted
Talk:Maple Flag

message: I plan to expand it. V. Joe 20:55, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Don't delete

message: If you would like to add any more information that is relevant, feel free.
Itchy01ca 22:34, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info 
Talk:Sherco

message: The Talk:List_of_motorcycle_manufacturers page seems to indicate that Sherco is a French, not Spanish company, so thats what this page says as well.
: In fact it's both Frnech and Spanish Pickle 19:04, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  April TBM 2006 says its both Pickle 07:50, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nationality 

message: Well "close to" is of course relative, but Nimes is at least 200 Kilometers away from the nearest Italy border. 192.166.198.50 (talk) 23:51, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Nîmes, France, close to Italy."
Talk:Ramberg–Osgood relationship

message: Need to mention true stress-strain curve vs. engineeing stress-strain curve
--------------  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.1.222.148 (talk) 09:40, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

message: I think this page needs some more information to make sense.  Jamescaf512 21:03, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: More information

message: There appears to be some confusion among editors as to the hardening constant, n, used in the Ramberg-Osgood equation. Both (n vs. 1/n) can be correct but the meaning is different. If the value of n is taken to be the Hollomon strain hardening constant then the R-O formulation should use (1/n). If n is taken to be a separate constant as defined in the original R-O paper it is actually equal to the inverse of the Hollomon strain hardening constant. See the link below (section on Ramberg-Osgood) for a good summary. I have returned the n values to their derivations in the original papers even though it may be less practical and using the Hollomon version of n.
https://mechanicalc.com/reference/mechanical-properties-of-materials
Bob Clemintime (talk) 17:56, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  n vs 1/n
Talk:Opération Daguet

message: I am a little bit surprised by the "AMX-30 of the French 6th Light Armoured Division": the current 6th Armoured Brigade does not have units operating main battle tanks like the AMX-30, but only light wheeled tanks, armoured troop transports and self-propelled artillery. Can anyone comment on this ? Rama 07:43, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Further, during the Gulf War, like the British, formations, units on operation ‘mixed and matched’ to bring together the best equipped, the full strengthened, and to make up shortfalls in personnel. Peacetime and paper formations and formations on operation don’t always match. Chwyatt 11:36, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Think 4 RD was assigned from the armored divisions in France for the op. Not from 7th Armored, and not from 3rd or 5th Armoured in Germany. Buckshot06 14:19, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  An AMX-30 of the French 6th Light Armoured Division 