Talk:Glenbrook North High School

message: Glenbrook North High School survived vfd. See: Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Glenbrook North High School -- Wile E. Heresiarch 16:09, 14 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Votes for deletion

message: GBN also stands for Glenbard North High School -- a school in Carol Stream, Illinois — Ilγαηερ (Tαlκ) 02:40, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  FYI 

message: Per a user request I've moved the page back to Glenbrook North High School, which is the name used for the school in the introductory line of the article. If you want it renamed again please discuss it here and reach consensus before unilaterally moving it. --kingboyk 19:53, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page Name 

message: Is "life saving" a real club? It seems like a joke that someone just posted. 128.12.71.14 05:59, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Activities 

message: I am curious as to why the deletion of all mention the famous "Powderpuff" hazing incident by an admitted school pupil has gone unnoticed.
CatCrofts 00:27, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hazing Incident Deletion 

message: :Image:Glenbrook North High School shield.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 00:50, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Glenbrook North High School shield.png

message: This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 14:29, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating

message: The hazing incident section details something that happened over 5 years ago, and yet it's over 1/3 of the article. This seems to be undue weight, and should probably be trimmed down. Arthurrh (talk) 02:05, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree.  Seems appropriate, well-written, and of sufficient length.  Dmarquard (talk) 04:00, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hazing incident section 

message: The image :Image:Glenbrook5.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here.  In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.  Please check
:* That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
:* That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --02:39, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image copyright problem with Image:Glenbrook5.jpg

message: A nine-user debate on deleting Glenbrook North results in keeping the article for the notoriety of a female mud fight, while a four-user debate on deleting the GADGET (Glenbrook Aerospace Development Get-away Experiment Team)  results in deletion per nomination (which reasoning is documented as "a club at one high school is entirely non-notable").
So now we have five external links that promote sites like .  Meanwhile, there is no mention of the multiple science experiments flown from this one high school .  What other High School has such a flown experiment count, especially considering only 120 Shuttle flights? 
And a record of activities on the school web site?  
But, while this notable Hazing incident  and its cover up  ("...not make any book or movie deals about the incident...") continue the long tradition, educational outreach thru flown space science experiments reaches the end of a three decade life.   
Do my comments violate NPOV?  Perhaps.  For example, until now, I have not called for a scientific examination of the need for graphic coverage of the need for young females to smear excrement on their bodies as a result of high school ritual, administrator discipline, parental encouragement and alcohol.  Thus, from ,
    1. Use your experience: Consider the problem and try to make sense of it. Look for previous explanations. 
a) Alcohol+Females=>Shocking Graphics
b) "High school ritual"==Hazing
c) "Administrator discipline"=>"Reactionary behavior"
d) "parental encouragement"=="Become adults with alcohol"
If this is a new problem to you, then move to step 2.
    2. Form a conjecture: When nothing else is yet known, try to state an explanation, to someone else, or to your notebook.
a) Parents or students or both, do not have their needs 
met.  
b) They engage (inappropriately) in behavior that seeks a satisfying control of their environment and acknowledgment by their peers. 
    3. Deduce a prediction from that explanation: If you assume 2 is true, what consequences follow?
a) Consequence: rebellion against the authority whose rules suppress their environmental control needs, 
b) Consequence: rebellion against the authority whose rules suppress their acknowledgment needs, and c) Consequence: rebellion against the authority whose rules suppress their satisfaction needs,
d) Consequence: rebellion against the authority whose rules suppress their self-esteem. 
    4. Test : Look for the opposite of each consequence in order to disprove 2. It is a logical error to seek 3 directly as proof of 2. This error is called affirming the consequent. 
a) Opposite of 3a)= Embrace of the authority whose rules suppress their environmental control needs, 
b) Opposite of 3b)= Embrace of the authority whose rules suppress their acknowledgment needs, 
c) Opposite of 3c)= Embrace of the authority whose rules suppress their satisfaction needs, and
d) Opposite of 3d)= Embrace of the authority whose rules suppress their self-esteem.
Yet, the ultimate result to the hazing incident was for the parents and students to embrace the rules and authority of the administration, desiring to graduate, complying with the gag request, serving sentences for conviction of charges on assault, battery and provision of alcohol.
Therefore, the prediction is disproved, and the theory fails.
I also violate "No original research" here, so I am so glad I did this on the Talk pages and not in the article.
Then am I to conclude that Notoriety trumps progress?  And if so, on with the documentation of shocking orgy and excess?  Let's all ignore the progress of science education, because (ho, hum) exemplary science education is everywhere practiced well as a matter of course...  and let's face it, it IS very Boring... and life is more than bean counting photons... I'm so tired...  come on, let's give it up for a while...  Thank you Wikipedia, for letting me learn how to frame an argument... and   why my thoughts do not always fit into logic...  Outrage turns to ennui, and reflection reframes thought.  SalineBrain (talk) 18:01, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Great! Notoriety trumps progress, or Why delete GADGET, but not Glenbrook North & Hazing incident?

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Glenbrook North High School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090813224305/http://www.suntimes.com:80/sports/preps/highschool/649446,CST-SPT-spot14.article to http://www.suntimes.com/sports/preps/highschool/649446,CST-SPT-spot14.article
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:01, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: What is DECA? Kdammers (talk) 16:03, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  DECA 

message: Upd(eb)ate: 2016 Illinois champions, qualifying for the Tournament of Champions.  Since 1982, 18 state champions; since 1980, 13 national champions.(Glenview Announcements April 21, 2016, p. 13: "Glenview debaters heading to nationals" by Irv Leavitt.</font>) Kdammers (talk) 16:11, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Debate 

message: There have been many attempts by fans of the South Korean band "NCT" to add one of the members, John Suh, an alumnus of the high school, to the wikipedia page. Although he does not have an individual wikipedia page, his band does. Does this qualify him to be on the list of notable alumni, or should it be left alone? There are some members of Kpop groups who have their own pages, so that would seem to indicate that until he has his own page and gains notoriety for his individual accomplishments, he should remain off this list. What are your thoughts?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lukestepford (talk • contribs) 21:06, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notoriety of the alumnus and NCT Member Johnny 

message: Hi, I'm improving this article like I did for Northbrook, Illinois. I am going to largely base it off of other high schools' pages like Naples High School and Lane Tech College Prep High School. Feel free to help and fix any errors (especially with citing sources).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Meme Star27 (talk • contribs) 00:32, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revamping Article