lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Bishop of Wakefield

message: There are forty-four diocesan archbishops and bishops in the Church of England, but only twenty-six are permitted to sit in the House of Lords. The Archbishops of Canterbury and York automatically have a seat. As do the Bishops of London, Durham and Winchester. The remaining twenty-one seats are filled in order of seniority in order of their consecration. It may take a diocesan Bishop a number of years before they qualify to take a seat. Until then, they are not a Lord Bishop, simply a Bishop. The Bishops of Sodor and Man and Gibraltar in Europe are not eligible to sit in the House of Lords.At present, the Bishop of Wakefield can not take a seat because his consecration is not high enough. Look at who can see sit in the House of Lords here. Scrivener-uki (talk) 16:13, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bishops and Lord Bishops 
Talk:Terdema Ussery

message: Pretty crazy that there isn't a single mention of Ussery being a convicted sexual offender and the numerous harassment suits revealed by Sports Illustrated.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.171.171.29 (talk) 21:34, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes it's very concerning that this reads as this mans resume as if he's applying to a job somewhere, it was even worse before so at least it's gotten better. This mans largest claim to fame by far is that he created one of the most misogynistic work places in sports, the fact that he was forced out & most of it was swept under the rug for PR purposes doesn't make it any less true, the case against him was very credible & there's many reputable sources covering the case. In fact if you google his name, or any combination of Terdema Ussery & Dallas Mavericks it's completely dominated by the this fact. 94.255.131.185 (talk) 13:20, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Talk:Flinders Ranges

message: Most of this material was previously in the article for "Flinders Ranges National Park".    it includes a lot of stuff about geography, history, mining etc  in the region ,   and nothing about the actual national park which includes only a small part of the flinders ranges. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eregli bob (talk • contribs) 
:Yeah good move, needs tidyup now tho. :: maelgwn - talk 11:24, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As you have noted, echidna are not marsupials.  Given that dunnarts and planigales are marsupials, rather than incorrectly classify those, I have removed enchidna from the list.  --74.70.151.200 (talk) 04:38, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: But how was it incorrect? Marsupials are as much mammals as are monotremes. 74.243.14.107 (talk) 23:42, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: User:Itsonlyme/History_of_the_Flinders_Ranges is a great article which could be used to expand this one. User hasnt edited in over six years, and email isnt enabled ;-( John Vandenberg (chat) 00:07, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abandoned draft 

message: Did you see this http://spaceinimages.esa.int/Images/2013/12/Flinders_Ranges_South_Australia  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.49.40.89 (talk) 04:50, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  New images
Talk:Toole's Theatre

message: In the infobox, we have fields for Opened, Closed and Years Active.  The last gives the same info as the first two.  Can we eliminate the repetition?  Best regards, -- Ssilvers 16:19, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox

message: I wonder if the present title is the best possible one? It seems to me that as the theatre was the Charing Cross Theatre for seven years, the Folly for five, and Toole's for fifteen, the last might be more helpful to the reader. I note that the well-known fan site Arthur Lloyd, The London Encyclopaedia, and the theatre historians Mander and Mitchenson have "Toole's Theatre" rather than "Folly Theatre" as their page/article/chapter headings. Grateful for people's thoughts on this. Tim riley talk 13:18, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I do enjoy a good folly, but I can understand if you plump for the toole... I think the latter is probably the better of the two here. - SchroCat (talk) 20:42, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: A casual review of the sources gives the impression that Toole's is the more commonly used name. It's probably not a critical change, as the alternate names should still be redirects to this one, but I think Toole's has more support in sources. Schazjmd (talk) 21:06, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Would it not also be logical as the last name the theatre had before demolition? KJP1 (talk) 06:02, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I too think Tooles would be better.  I seem to remember reading about this theatre during my Frank Matcham revamp; I'll have to try and dig it out.  CassiantoTalk 08:07, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

text: And now done. Tim riley talk 07:55, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title of article
Talk:Shipley (UK Parliament constituency)

message: The candidates can't be candidates until the poll is called. Before then, they're prospective candidates.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.189.103.145 (talk) 12:04, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The law has now been changed so calling a person a candidate no longer starts their expenses running. - Galloglass 12:33, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: candidates

message: The current analysis of the last election result is extremely poor and clearly written by a Labour supporter. The BNP got a greater share of the vote than the Greens, and there is no evidence provided or available to support the author's viewpoint.I have refrained from rewriting myself as a member of another party to avoid introducing further bias 87.194.56.53 (talk) 21:51, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: recent history
Talk:Eotriceratops

message: The reference for its size is the dinosaur size page. 122.105.220.129 (talk) 09:04, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed it, would still be nice to get a primary or at least secondary source rather than a news article. Dinoguy2 (talk) 11:10, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia can't reference Wikipedia 

message: thumb|left|This picture ( Triceratops-Eotriceratops size 01.JPG )is inaccurate in size.I think i made the body of Eotriceratops to big in picture "Triceratops-Eotriceratops size 01.JPG" ( left ). That's because i dont think the first version was accurate. But the new, "Triceratops-Eotriceratops size 02.JPG", i think i made the proportions right. If so, Eotriceratops would have been 9, 5 metres.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Conty (talk • contribs) 13:57, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New study of the size 

message: I have made the new size comparioson ( picture "Triceratops-Eotriceratops size 01.JPG" ) by oneself, and based the size on the skull. The skull of Eotriceratops is not just a bigger version of the Triceratops skull. For example, the Eotriceratops frill is proportionaly longer than in Triceratops, so you cant just simply scale up the size of Triceratops to Eotriceratops, only by base the size of the skull ( i tried to scale up Triceratops skull, and i came to the conclusion that if Triceratops skull was 3 meter ( 9 feet ) long, the hole body, from nose to tip of the tail, should have been about 11, 8 meter long). Because Eotriceratops skull had longer frill, it was probably not quite 12 metre long, but my study ( Im not a expert ) rather indicate a total body length of Eotriceratops to about 10, 5 meter. 
/Conty, 11-04-2009.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Conty (talk • contribs) 11:42, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New size 

message: Is the size listed accurate? 12 metres is really quite enormous, even for a ceratopsid, and I would hardly call The Sun a reputable source of reliable factual information. Hai ren (talk) 00:10, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the size accurate?
Talk:Avenham Park

message: Someone has replaced the picture of the Japanese garden with that of a pupil from Hounsdown School. That really should be sorted out...—Preceding unsigned comment added by NFreak007 (talk • contribs) 11:05, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:East Yorkshire (UK Parliament constituency)

message: Is there a definitive reference for this renaming?  Several external official-ish sites use the former name, which is apparently outdated?  e.g.
* Sitting MP's biography page on parliament.uk: https://www.parliament.uk/biographies/commons/sir-greg-knight/1200
* House of Commons Library Constituency dashboard: https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/local-data/constituency-dashboard/ - apologies for not being able to provide a link to the specific constituency
* Electoral Commission: https://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/our-work/our-research/electoral-data/2017-uk-general-election-results ; specific data hosted on Tableau: https://public.tableau.com/shared/QMSFP8RY5?:display_count=yes&:showVizHome=no
* Recent articles from the Hull Daily Mail: https://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/news/hull-east-yorkshire-news/how-mps-vote-theresa-mays-2321402 - "Another to back the PM is Sir Greg Knight, MP for East Yorkshire, ..."
* TheyWorkForYou: https://www.theyworkforyou.com/mp/11026/greg_knight/east_yorkshire
* The sitting MP's own site: http://gregknight.com/ - "Member of Parliament for East Yorkshire"
The only place I've so far found using "Yorkshire East" is the BBC: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/politics/constituencies/E14000683
This wiki page itself still has at least 3 non-historical references to "East Yorkshire" (intro paragraph, two in the infobox), which should really be changed if this indeed an outdated name.
NB: I'm definitely not knowledgeable enough to claim that everyone else is right and this Wiki page is wrong - I can easily imagine confusion arising from systems/data not getting updated, people having the old name ingrained, etc - but given how widely the apparently-wrong name is in use, perhaps this Wiki page should be more explicit about things?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ErsatzCulture (talk • contribs) 18:01, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  East Yorkshire or Yorkshire East?
Talk:Beverley and Holderness (UK Parliament constituency)

message: Map 1: the constituency is in the East Riding of Yorkshire, not 'Humberside'.
Map 2: This also needs changing. 'Humberside' no longer exists so should not appear on a map of England.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by MG291 (talk • contribs) 17:26, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It does not need doing as the boundary commission reviewed the boundary as though it was Humberside and that is what we use for the constituency. When the boundary commission review the boundaries under the East Riding of Yorkshire them we will change the mapping etc to match. So you need to wait for the boundary commission. Keith D (talk) 12:49, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Humberside' problem with the maps 

message: In the boundaries section, it states that Woodmansey was taken out of the constituency of Beverley and Holderness and assigned to Haltemprice and Howden. This is is untrue - it remains in Beverley and Holderness. 15:13, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, http://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/election-maps/gb/ suggests it's still in Beverley & Holderness, too 83.244.221.226 (talk) 17:08, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Woodmansey 
Talk:Ron Lynch (comedian)

message: What's the problem with the article?  Ron Lynch is certainly signficant enough and has a body of work spread over a significant amount of time that warrants an article.  Without adding any new content to any other article, 26 articles linked to this one at its creation.  This article was in fact sorely overdue.
Please describe in detail what's missing from this article that makes you want to delete it. Torc2 11:25, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy deletion
Talk:Charles Latham

message: The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.
*Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.[?]
*Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.[?]
*This article has no or few images. Please see if there are any free use images that fall under the Wikipedia:Image use policy and fit under one of the Wikipedia:Image copyright tags that can be uploaded. To upload images on Wikipedia, go to Special:Upload; to upload non-fair use images on the Wikimedia Commons, go to commons:special:upload.[?]
*Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at Wikipedia:Guide to layout.[?]
*This article is a bit too short, and therefore may not be as comprehensive as WP:WIAFA critera 1(b) is looking for. Please see if anything can be expanded upon.[?]
*Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.[?]
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Auroranorth 13:02, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Automated peer review 1
File talk:Shallow water waves.gif

message: This looks like a simulation of the linearised shallow water equations, not the full nonlinear equations - is this correct? 130.88.16.254 11:32, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: How can you tell? --82.166.251.178 23:34, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

message: See . Makeemlighter (talk) 13:16, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kept as FP
Talk:Parol

message: Will be working on this article on December so it would be a DYK during the Christmas season. :)--Lenticel (talk) 05:09, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Can i join yah? --βritandβeyonce (talk•contribs)  12:42, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

message: Does anyone have that widely publicized Christmas in the Philippines book? I think it's titled Pasko or something like that. That can be used as a reliable source. --seav (talk) 06:13, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, but you do know which book I'm talking about, right? Good luck on the DYK, I'll upload a papercraft parol pic this week. --seav (talk) 09:12, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry but our school's library will close this vacation so I can't help on off line sources. --βritandβeyonce (talk•contribs) 11:04, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Philippines Christmas book 

message: I had to remove the capiz shells in the intro since the thought talks about its traditional construction and the latter is only an innovation. --βritandβeyonce (talk•contribs) 06:25, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Content removal

message: Hook... Hook... Hook... Who can make a brilliant hook for the DYK? hehe. --βritandβeyonce (talk•contribs) 10:14, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's quite more interesting with the ALT hook. By the way, images in the parol page are not that good so adding it to the DYK nominees perhaps won't make sense. Maybe seav, titopao or any tambays can provide us.  --βritandβeyonce (talk•contribs) 06:33, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The hook would depend on the DYK admins' taste. Too bad we don't have an "award-winning" picture yet. Then again there's 4 days before Christmas. --Lenticel (talk) 10:49, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I thought they have already that pic? --βritandβeyonce (talk•contribs) 06:38, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hook

message: Those images I added, especially the electric parol are temporary. If you can find a better one, please change or add. Thank you. --βritandβeyonce (talk•contribs) 10:14, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added three of my photos. Feel free to rearrange. :) --seav (talk) 17:45, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I love the image; the one being trio. It's very nice. But it's kinda same motiff with the capiz shells. hehe. Nanghinayang ako. Sana, na-upload yun bago ito maDYK. =) 07:09, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Images
Talk:Gustaf Aulén

message: The subject is notable and the article should not be deleted. Aulen's work, Christus Victor, greatly shook up the way modern Christian theologians think about the atonement, and the title of the work has become a theological term in its own right. Aulen has an entry in the Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, 1st ed., Walter A. Elwell, ed. (p. 107), a very significant reference work.
I will contribute to the article if I have time. Sorry if I did anything wrong; this is my first post on Wikipedia.Sean Babu 11:39, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Jews Against Zionism

message: I was wrong i copied word for word from the main source of this article, i should have made it in quotes but now that this book has more sources that relies upon. I have rewritten the article, Talk:Jews Against Zionism (book)/Temp. So copyright infringement should no longer be of a problem.--יודל 11:42, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright problem
Talk:Leeds North West (UK Parliament constituency)

message: I think we should mention the proposed splitting of the constituency by the boundary commission. Gsykesvoyage (talk) 01:37, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  split after boundary comission
Talk:Alex Shagin

message: Not sure about the copyright of those images, they come from here  (click on alex shagrin's name), but it could be the uploader really is the copyright holder. RMHED (talk) 02:02, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Varsoda

message: VARSODA IS A PRINCELY STATE.RAJPUTS RAOL CHAVDA WERE THE RULER OF VARSODA.THER ARE JAIN BRAHMIN RABARIS AND OTHER COMUNITY.SO MANYTEMPLES OF EVERY RELIGION ARE IN VARSODA.
 BHUPATSINH MANSINH CHAVDA
GANDHINAGAR'''''
Mr Bhupatsinh, Please don't post personal details.. I will include temple and other details.. later on in proper English.
Thanks for your contribution.
Regards
Chandrapalsinh Ghanshyamsinh Chavda  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cpsinh (talk • contribs) 15:54, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Dharmatala

message: In the etymology section the first two opinion about possible origin of the name is not referenced (mentioned below), rather the two other referenced opinions are kept after that. The first two opinions: "Dharmatala means Holy Street. It is commonly held to derive its name from a large mosque which stood at the site of Cook and Company’s livery stables." "Some discern the name as a reference to dharma, one of the units of the Buddhist Trinity. There was a Buddhist temple at Janbazar, nearby." Sreerup Banerjee 06:56, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Hugo Riesenfeld

message: I have removed the "Expand German" flag from the Filmography section. The flag had been in place since 2011. I felt that this 10-year-old flag should be removed, as the section appears to be reasonably populated with a good number of Riesenfeld's film scores. If someone thinks the flag should be reinstated, please do so, with an explanation on this talk page as to why it was reinstated. Thank you. Erzahler (talk) 04:24, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Expand German" flag removed
Talk:List of Indonesian dishes

message: Suffer greatly from added unlinked items - this list will be broken up soon to separate unlinked items from linked -
if you do not understand please read carefully  WP:NOT - thank you SatuSuro 08:52, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Indonesian lists

message: When following red links - consitute WP:OR and WP:POV - as there is no connected WP:RS on this list.  SatuSuro 13:13, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Qualifiers

message: Excuse me, some of the dishes' region stated as from "Indonesia", here I replace it with term nationwide. But it is little bit confusing because the origin is particular but stated as nationwide (Indonesia).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 02Wahyudi (talk • contribs) 07:11, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Region
Talk:Mir Geribert

message: Every name has been redlinked. Rather than de-link myself, I'd rather some more competent editor remove all but the handful that may become articles in the near future. Wikipedia is not a Catalan prosopography. --Wetman (talk) 04:02, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed two redlinks that are probably worthless. (I can't remember why I created them in the first place.) I left the bishop of Barcelona and count of Cerdagne, since they should become articles. Since the viscounts were somewhat like mayors or maybe more important, I left them in since the modern mayors of Barcelona seem to have notability enough. I wouldn't have a fit if they were removed, though there is enough information out there for articles. Srnec (talk) 18:45, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems good to me. Yes,we aren't a prosopography, but there's usually something can be said about 11th century counts, viscounts, and bishops. Better a bit too many red links than not enough in my humble opinion. Angus McLellan  (Talk) 18:49, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Urania sloanus

message: Surely (speaking as a Latinist not a lepidopterist) the name should be the genitive 'sloani', and not what appears to be a masculine adjective 'sloanus' modifying a feminine noun 'urania'? Awien 16:33, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not a Latinist, nor a lepidopterist (although I am an amateur one). But you seem to be right. I’ll give you my best (amateur) lepidopterist answer: The specific epithet “sloanus” was given before the genus “Urania”. Meaning Pieter Cramer (1721 - 1779), who named the moth in 1779, was probably right at that time, but then Johan Christian Fabricius (1745 - 1808) changed the butterfly into a new genus (Urania) created by himself in 1807. Because Cramer was the first one to describe the moth, the name he gave is kept (in respect for him... he did discover the specie), but since the genus was “wrong” it is changed. I invite you to ask any questions you might have about my explication. Pro bug catcher (talk • contribs). 23:35, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well . . . Latin for 'Sloan's' is 'sloani' in the same way 'Hodgson's' is 'hodgsoni' as explained in the binomial nomenclature article, 'Commerson's' is 'commersoni', 'Lincoln's' is 'lincolnii', and so on. So whatever the history, 'sloanus' is atrocious Latin, and I suspect that if we went to actual printed nineteenth-century sources it's not what we would find, in spite of what we find on the internet. However, the natural sciences are not my field, so I'm butting out. Just before I go, though, the singular of 'species' is 'species', not 'specie' (Lewis and Short, A Latin Dictionary, p. 1736).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Awien (talk • contribs) 00:06, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

text: In response to Pro bug catcher, and to prevent the spread of incorrect information: When making a new combination (changing the genus to which a species is assigned), the author who makes the new combination must alter the specific epithet so that it grammatically agrees with the genus. Ypna (talk) 01:08, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Latin name
Talk:London Oratory

message: Why is this a separate article from Brompton Oratory?
:I hope I've clarified that in the lead. The London Oratory is the order, not the building. I also discovered a copyright violation - the material has been removed. It should not be readded as a copy of the website. Thanks Kbthompson (talk) 17:09, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled