lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:If Not for You

message: You're right - it is notable. Still, the article could use padding out a bit - is every song written by these two notable? Why this one in particular I'm not contending but the article could use expanding with the reasons why! Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry 04:40, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion

message: This whole sentence does not make much sense, because of much garbling (typographical errors)? Also, this sentence seems to say that the Top 40 is very different from the Hot 100, which is rather obvious, or that the orders from 1 to 40 on both of the charts is quite different, which might be quite true - or not.
The top 40 chart performance on WLS[24] was much earlier than, and very different from on, the Hot 100.24.156.77.8 (talk) 07:31, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: This whole sentence does not make much sense

message: What does this mean? Please explain: "Basing her version on the Harrison arrangement rather than Dylan's arrangement." Please explain in terms that ordinary laymen can understand, and not just experts in music.24.156.77.8 (talk) 07:36, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does this mean? Please explain. 

message: Wasn't the song transformed into a children's book, with Zimmy credited as the author?PurpleChez (talk) 17:05, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for that. I've just added mention in the article. JG66 (talk) 17:39, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Book
Talk:Keith Mansfield

message: Funky Fanfare = Soul Thing? I'll look into the liner notes to see which song was actually sampled..  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.68.197.111 (talk) 16:46, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Which "Superstar Fanfare" piece was used for the Worldvision Home Video, Media West and Crown Movie Classics jingles?
WikiPro1981X (talk) 17:59, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Worldvision Home Video, Media West and Crown Movie Classics Jingle 

message: Mansfield, according to Game Show Wikia, also did music for the 1980's CBS game show Press Your Luck. Song sheet included in this ref: http://gameshows.wikia.com/wiki/Press_Your_Luck
But here's something better: he also did some songs for the adult film "A Girl's Best Friend," as detailed at IMDB: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0082452/soundtrack ElMeroEse (talk) 04:20, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other Works 

message: The article repeatedly refers to something it calls "library music recordings" without explaining what these are. I've been a professional musician all my long life, working in rock, jazz, and classical idioms with a graduate degree in music theory and published works, and I have no idea what this is supposed to mean. TheScotch (talk) 22:08, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: "Library Music" in this sense is refferring to Production Music Philedmondsuk (talk) 20:17, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  “Library music recordings”?
Talk:Golda Och Academy

message: None of the individuals listed have Wikipedia articles, and no sources are provided to demonstrate that these individuals meet the WP:BIO standard. If references to newspaper and magazine articles articles can be provided to demonstrate notability AND a connection to the school, I will be more than happy to assist you in adding the sources in the required format. Until this information is provided, they need to be removed from the article. Alansohn 21:44, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notables

message: This article is one of a  number selected for the early stage of the trial of the Wikipedia:Pending Changes system on the English language Wikipedia. All the articles listed at Wikipedia:Pending changes/Queue   are being considered for level 1 pending changes protection.
The following request appears on that page:
Comments on the suitability of theis page for "Pending changes"  would be appreciated.
Please update the Queue page as appropriate.
Note that I am not involved in this project any much more than any other editor, just posting these notes since it is quite a big change, potentially
Regards, Rich Farmbrough, 00:05, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Pending changes
Talk:Glaphyra

message: This woman had an unknown daughter who likely was the Virgin Mother with Cleopatra's son who went missing from historic record.
I can't stop thinking of literature associated to Instagram and my 2020 rough sketches regarding King Herod and Mary.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 156.155.69.78 (talk) 18:52, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

message: It seems to me that Herod Archelaus was within the law as I read it in Deuteronomy 25. Am I missing something? Since this event occurred between 6 BCE and 6 CE, the answer can't be that he was violating the Talmud, which wasn't begun until the Yeshivas were established in Galilee in 70 CE. Any light on the subject would be welcome.
Pete Hardy (talk) 22:28, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  How did the marriage of Glaphyra and Herod Archelaus violate the law of Levirate marriage? 
Talk:TAS2R38

message: Despite citing multiple valuable sources on TAS2R38, this page was inadequate and lacking information.  I expanded it into three sections: "signal transduction", "PTC sensitivity", and "PROP bitterness, sensitivity, and alcoholism".  I used most of the sources already cited in the references with the addition of several primary articles referenced in cited review articles.  I created links back to the main "taste receptor" page and linked out to other Wikipedia articles to make the scientific jargon understandable to inexperienced readers.  I also added external links to the TAS2R38 Gene Card and the TAS2R38 OMIM page.  Previously, the page was a stub, but I have expanded it to encompass several basic but crucial aspects of the TAS2R38 receptor.
Kelsiejaness (talk) 02:38, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion
Talk:Taste receptor

message: Expanded the "taste receptor" page to provide details about general gustation, signal transduction, and each class of taste receptors. This way people looking for an overview on taste (and particularly taste receptors) can use this page rather than a particular receptor page, which may be too specific. Linked out to other Wikipedia articles for clarification of scientific terms. Sources used were generally those found on the pages of specific receptors and/or cited in the "taste receptor" page already. This page was a stub and is now greatly expanded. 
Kelsiejaness (talk) 02:24, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion

message: The possibility of a fat receptor's existence was presented, and the targets were identified. Primary research to support claims was included.
Pjuviler (talk) 10:21, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: ‎ Thanks for your additions, however per WP:SCIRS and WP:MEDRS, what are needed are secondary sources (i.e., review articles) not primary sources to support claims.  Fortunately there are a number of relevant review articles (see for example , ).  Several proteins have been proposed as fat taste receptors, but as the reviews make clear, the evidence is not definitive.  The Taste_receptor#Fat section needs to be written so that it is consistent with the conclusions of the reviews. Boghog (talk) 18:07, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Fat

message: This article needs reviewing regarding umami. 
If this is a taste then it should be in the list of tastes. It is not.
3.1 Savory or glutamates
3.2 Sweet
3.3 Bitter
3.4 Sour
3.5 Salt
3.6 Carbonation
3.7 Fat
If the authors are trying to change the name to Savory then say so. This is problematic because savory refers to other herbs etc and other tastes that are not Umami and Umami is the recognized name.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.103.184.76 (talk) 19:04, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: umami

message: It appears that scientists may have discovered that water does, indeed, have a taste (in that it stimulates taste receptors). https://curiosity.com/topics/what-does-water-taste-like-science-finally-has-an-answer-curiosity/
Nsayer (talk) 18:23, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Water
Talk:KBWS-FM

message: FCC ownership records filed with the acquistion identify the new owner of the station as Armada Media – Watertown, Inc.  There is no mention that Stone Media is a subsidiary of Aramada Media.StreamingRadioGuide 01:14, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Theatre Three

message: Theatre Three was founded in the very late 1960s.  (Its website says 1969.) 
As I recall, it was actually a sort-of "spinoff" from the Brookhaven Lab Theater Group at in general, and from the very successful series of on-site revues called "Showstoppers", in particular.  These productions directed by Jerry Friedman (a BNL programmer who occupied the office across the hall from mine, in  the Applied Mathematics Dept.)  Jerry later left BNL to study psychology at Stony Brook, later earning his doctorate and setting up a practice.
Some time after "Showstoppers" was taken "on the road" with great success, Theatre Three was formed.  My understanding was that the "Three" was for the "Three Village" area, where the group was located - in various locations - before obtaining the current building; however, I am not certain about the name.  
In the early days of Theater Three, many BNL Theater Group regulars were involved, including Ronny & Julie Peierls, Bob Marr, Graham Campbell, Mike Losquadro, and others (including myself).
Bradlee Bing, a teacher at Longwood High School (just outside BNL) later became "Artistic Director" of Theatre Three.  Other teachers were involved, but I don't think the name came from that.  (If "three teachers" can be verified as the origin of the name, then I apologize for removing it and ask that it be restored.)
I'd be glad to supply further information and history
(party from my collection of old programs, etc.)
My email address is bam@abcdunlimited.com
<BR>
Tripodics 22:00, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Note
Talk:Savage Model 99

message: I am not allowed to upload images from my account yet, but I took a photo and uploaded it to imageshack.  Here is the image.  If anyone could upload it that would be great.
http://img100.imageshack.us/img100/2103/pc070091cx0.jpg
This article says "at one time or another" and listed the calibers the Savage 99 was chambered in. Why not give specific years for when it was first chambered in each caliber?
What a crappy photo - whose idea was it to use a black and white catalog advertisement of a figure holding a model 99?  He may as well have a pop gun for all anyone can tell.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.215.237.71 (talk) 22:08, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo 

message: The article states that Savage invented the detachable magazine in 1908, but others, like the Short-magazine Lee-Enfield used detachable magazines previously. Should this be removed?
Drumminor2nd (talk) 23:07, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure. Probably it just needs rewording, it actually claims he invented the "modern" detachable magazine, and there is a patent, so some investigation and rewording is probably necessary. AliveFreeHappy (talk) 23:34, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible issue 

message: I have several additional issues with this article:
-The intro paragraph talks more about the .300 Savage cartridge than the rifle, which is more appropriate in the .300 Savage article than in the Model 99 article.
-Who says Savage is best-known for the Model 99? There is no reference for that. That is a very subjective statement, and if no-one objects, I will remove it. 
-The article states "The Model 1895 was the first lever action designed to shoot high-powered cartridges with spitzer bullets, nitrocellulose powder and berdan primers." There have been other lever-action rifles for these types of bullets, such as the Winchester Model 1895. Which came first? 
-The idea of discussing the Savage 1895 inside an article about it's decendent seems backwards. Would it not be better to either have a separate article on the 1895 or have the Model 99 as a sub-section of the 1895, rather than the other way around? Drumminor2nd (talk) 01:28, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead-in and other issues
Talk:Cryptogenic organizing pneumonia

message: It's my understanding that BOOP is an outdated term and that the COP is more widely accepted. However they are the same disease. COP is being used more widely because it describes the disease a bit better and is less readily confused with Bronchiolitis Obliterans. At least that's what Robbins Pathologic Basis of Disease states.
The above is true and the articles need merging.--24.214.167.195 23:39, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "BOOP" is a valid histological finding. However it is no longer a diagnosis. "COP" is effectively "idiopathic BOOP". The use of the term "BOOP" to mean "idiopathic organising pneumonia" is indeed obsolete. However the histology is not. The terms should be kept separate. Axl (talk) 13:17, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

text: A family member just received a diagnosis of BOOP from a Bronchial specialist.  So I would say that BOOP is still a valid diagnosis, even in mid-2008. 68.239.125.201 (talk) 00:46, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this move has been long overdue. I'm making an official move request below. Mikael Häggström (talk) 20:08, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Renaming to "Cryptogenic organizing pneumonia"

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: Moved. Clear need for move and no opposition after relist. (non-admin closure) –Ammarpad (talk) 09:39, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia →  – Both the American Thoracic Society and the European Respiratory Society hold that "Cryptogenic organizing pneumonia" is the prefered clinical term for this disease, and for multiple reasons (as stated by Dail and Hammar's Pulmonary Pathology, 2009, page 64):
*Avoid confusion with bronchiolitis obliterans, which may not be visualized in every case of this disease.
*Avoid confusion with constrictive bronchiolitis
*Emphasize the cryptogenic nature of the disease
The terms are about as common on Google ("bronchiolitis+obliterans+organizing+pneumonia" and "cryptogenic+organizing+pneumonia"). Mikael Häggström (talk) 20:08, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 12 January 2018
Talk:Indira Gandhi Zoological Park

message: *There appears to be some factual inaccuracies and confusion has arisen due to similarities in the names - this article is about Indira Gandhi Zoological Park, located in Andhra Pradesh, whereas some contents pertain to another park named Indira Gandhi National Park, located in Coimbatore district, Tamilnadu. I will study the matter further and sort out the contents. Others having knowledge of these two parks are requested to edit suitably. --Bhadani 14:22, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Pelargonium littorale

message: Full citation is 
In English: 
It is understandable that there would be some confusion as to who is the author. But in the end it is pretty straightforward. Who published the description is irrelevant. The author is the person who wrote the formal description. Therefore the name of this plant is "Pelargonium littorale Endl." as stated by APNI, not "Pelargonium littorale Hugel" as incorrectly stated by FloraBase. It is optional to include the person who came up with the name, so "Pelargonium littorale Hugel ex Endl." is also acceptable.
Hesperian 12:34, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I will use your second suggestion, this gave some support to my initial decision.  Thanks for clarifying that part. I will check the references more thoroughly, there are a couple of things I need to sort out with the species. Cygnis insignis 14:36, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Daniel Garrison

message: The information on this website was taken from the Bioguide of the US Congress, a public domain website. Unfortunately, Infoplease also uses the same free information. I have previously spoken with the manager of the bot that tags pages as such, and he said that there is no way to fix the bot so that the info won't be shown as taken from Infoplease, because bots are not yet that advanced. Please go to the Bioguide of the US Congress to find the original source of the information Mr. Vitale 22:10, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:International Accounting Standards Board

message: Almost all sourced to IASB website. Needs major press coverage, including of EU boards, structure of holdings, and opposition to US rules. Hornplease 22:11, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sourced

message: pls l real need your asditance on my study am mike Roberty the acco9unting student  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.138.8.212 (talk) 12:16, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  teaching leaning 
Talk:Ocean escort

message: Are or have there ever been "ocean escort" ships in other navies? If so, this article needs work as it's US-centric right now. - Ageekgal 22:25, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Still in need of work. DPdH (talk) 12:50, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: A brief Google search (discounting WP mirrors) shows only a few photos of Russian ships on history.navy.mil that are called "ocean escorts" by the Naval History & Heritage Command. These are the "Riga" and "Petya" classes, built circa 1954-65. A look at the WP articles for these classes (which are titled "frigates") shows that these classes' Russian designation of storozhevoi korabi translates to "escort ship" or "sentry ship". So the Russians and some of their clients had/have some vessels contemporary with the USN ocean escorts that were called "escort ships" by them (depending on translation) and would be on the small end of frigates internationally. The "Riga" and "Petya" classes were about the tonnage of the USN "Claud Jones" class or RN "Blackwood" class and much smaller than all subsequent USN ocean escorts. A look through Conway's 1947-95 shows that both RN and Soviet escort-sized ships are called frigates, while the French had corvettes. I recognize there's room for interpretation here, but I'd say that only the USN had ships that were called "ocean escorts" by the owning navy. RobDuch (talk) 06:31, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Worldview? 

message: What does the littoral combat ship have to do with this topic? It seems simply advertising or padding. 88.152.172.123 (talk) 18:17, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The US littoral combat ship 

message: Should not the Oliver Hazard Perry class be included in this? Although they never had the DEG hull classification, they are the direct design descendant to the Knox class. 192.88.94.10 (talk) 12:49, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Include Perry class?
Talk:Lozier

message: The Adirondack Museum hosted a talk described as
:"Lozier, An Automotive Legend Hidden in the Adirondacks" by Anthony Vaccaro at the Adirondack Museum, Blue Mountain Lake, NY.  
:A talk on the rapid rise and fall of a great bike, boat and automotive company that beat the best in the world on the lake, on the streets, and on the track.
It would appear that our article is lacking the "on the lake" part.  Anyone have any info on this?
Mwanner | Talk 22:13, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Template talk:Textile

message: Do we really need this? It is just an abbreviated list of fibers, and seems to serve only to make the template longer, in my opinion. We already have a link to fiber at the bottom in 'related'. Also many of the fibers listed are rarely used in fabric. Loggie (talk) 17:54, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Textile fibers section

message: I recommend removing Capilene from this list. It only redirects to the Patagonia article, which doesn't mention Capilene at all. I can't find anything on the internet about Capilene except from Patagonia here, and it doesn't strike me as dramatically different than textiles produced by other companies, which simply don't bother to name their products. However, I don't know much about fabrics. Sondra.kinsey (talk) 13:20, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capilene
Talk:Endotherm

message: endotherm has more meanings than the biological meaning cold-blooded.  It is also used in thermodynamic settings as a related word to endothermic.
-- 141.212.142.247 22:19, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article fails to mention which classes of living things are endotherms. Using Special:WhatLinksHere/Endotherm I see:
* Mammal
* Bird
* The tuna and Butterfly kingfish
* The only endothermic plant seems to be the Rhizanthes lowii
I noticed the statement "Since dinosaurs are also presumed to have been endotherms, the lack of small species and great number of known large species in North America was unusual." on the Hesperonychus article. A few of the articles on dinosaurs said they were presumed to be endotherms. Dinosaur#Physiology leans towards they being endothermis while Physiology of dinosaurs leaves this as undecided. Of the dinosaur articles I looked at the one for Plateosaurus was the least unambiguous on the subject being endothermic. Other articles used "... were presumed to be endothermic." --Marc Kupper|talk 00:56, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who are the endotherm?
Talk:Loudoun Castle

message: What the hell? I came here to look for information on the castle, not a theme park! Lianachan (talk) 01:49, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: As did I. Mnealon (talk) 14:29, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Perhaps it should be split into two pages, one for Loudoun Castle, and one for Loudoun Castle Theme Park?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zcomuto (talk • contribs) 17:29, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Huh? 

message: I have split the article into a new page on Loudoun Castle (theme park), and this page on Loudoun Castle, to address the above concerns.  Thanks, Jonathan Oldenbuck (talk) 11:56, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Split

message: No word on why and how the castle became a wreck and who owned it when that happened.  I heard it was destroyed in a fire in 1941.  That's something that should definitely be in the article, together with a little detail on what happened between the 1890s and the eventual dereliction of the house.
:My thoughts exactly.  Why is it ruined?  Was it overtaken by a sudden calamity such as a fire (as stated above) or the decline of the fortune of its family and subsequent fall into decay?  72.106.153.181 (talk) 00:33, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  How Ruined?
Talk:Canada Cup (curling)

message: I have assessed this as a Stub, as it contains only the basic information on the topic, and of low importance, as it a highly specialized topic within Canada. Cheers, CP 14:48, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: updated to start class.  PKT(alk) 14:08, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:Sterling K. Brown

message: I've removed some POV material that was not supported with citations -- if objective third-party sources can be provided to back up these assertions, by all means return them.  Accounting4Taste 22:20, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV material 

message: In September 2008, Brown was in "Righteous Kill" with Robert DeNiro.  That needs to be added in as a film role.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.150.110.99 (talk) 05:29, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Righteous Kill
Talk:Canadian Junior Curling Championships

message: I have assessed this as a Stub, as it does not cite any sources and does not contain much prose. I have assessed this as low importance, as it is a highly specific topic within Canada. Cheers, CP 23:14, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: thank you @arjayjay  for correcting my two corrections, on this and one other page!
I was having some trouble (as proved by the result) either with the editor on my phone or with my own eyes this morning. I have checked Wikipedia for "went on to to" and it is now clear. jw (talk) 18:16, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  /* typo */