Talk:Vegetto

message: Shouldn't we remove a lot of those and leave it to only the ones he actually used? Thanos6 22:51, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Special abilities 

message: Well it is said that Vegito may be stronger that Gogeta because of the Fusion Dance; however, with Goku's tail removed, Super Saiyan Gogeta's power may have been nearly equal to Vegito's.  As a fused Super Saiyan 4 Gogeta, there was no contest of power between the two.  Vegito seemed to be far above that of an unfused Super Saiyan 4.  Hmmm...I don't really know who's stronger since both powers demonstrate Old Kai's abilities. Smitheo1 21:15, 6 January 2006(UTC)
* Wiki-star: According to the Old Kia, the power of the potara is stronger than Fusion Dance. Therefore, Vegito is allready superior to Gogeta is everyway.
However, Super Sayain 4 Gogeta's power is immensley paramount. I would agree he's much more powerful than Vegito. But.....it's a debate!
Wiki-star 10:16, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: How can you be sure?--Suit-n-tie 18:44, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Old Kai states that Potara Fusion is stronger than the Fusion Dance, so if Vegetto went SSJ4 and fought SSJ4 Gogeta, Vegetto would win.--KojiDude (viva la BAM!) 20:57, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

text: Yeah, that, and the fact that Super Saiyan 4 Gogeta would be too cocky to use his devastating attacks.--Suit-n-tie 21:19, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vegito's Strength 

message: It is often said that in Vegetto, Vegeta is slightly dominant, while in Gogeta Goku is the dominant one.
Maybe this explains why Gogeta is taller than Vegetto, and why Vegetto is more arrogant too.  
It also explains why Gogeta is a mixture of the names of Goku and Vegeta, while Vegetto is a combination of Vegeta and Kakarotto, while the latter is never used by Goku but only by Vegeta.
What do you think?
Evilbu 22:00, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't understand what you guys are talking about. Both Vegetto and Gogeta look nothing like Vegeta.    He looks alot more like Goku then he does Vegeta. The whole section about Vegeta being dominant should he removed.--KojiDude 17:26, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, if Vegeta were dominant, Vegetto wouldn't look so happy.--Suit-n-tie 17:28, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vegeta's dominance 

message: * Wiki-star: I just finished cleaning, and editing the article. If anyone would like to enhance it they way it, by all means. But make sure that you enhance, and not eliminate. If you do eliminate, always provide a logical reason. Knowone will get down you're throat, at least you would've explain yourself. Thanks again!
Wiki-star 10:18, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Enhancements

message: This page uses a rediciously amount of "Fair Use" images. Please try to cut back on them, the legallity of using so many copyrighted images is highly disputed within Wikipedia, but more then likely it's not allowed under US law. (and this IS a US website and encyclopedia). - TheDJ (talk • contribs • WikiProject Television) 23:28, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair Use images

message: Ok, he is about as popular as Raditz by Google hits (less if you do + "Dragon Ball" or + "Dragon Ball Z") , and was around for around the same time. What makes him any more deserving of a page? Nemu 21:15, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, but i believe that you do not base "statistics" on how a character should or should not have a page! Why did you redirect Vegetto? Gooden 19:32, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect

message: Ladies and Gentlemen when we talk together and exchange knowledge, the information we gather as a team is ginormous! Please do not redirect the Vegetto page to a shorter, less informed section. If you believe this is the best way to go, discuss it first with the person or people who put forth the hard work to create the Vegetto article. Let's talk about it first! 
Thanks! Gooden 20:12, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It was already discussed on WP:DBZ. Nemu 20:15, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Could you more specifically direct me to the exact location of where this is being discussed. I appreciate the given link, but i've been looking everywhere! Gooden 20:23, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Here. Nemu 20:28, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Whew! I just got through reading all that jazz! So, after i finished reading that, i did not find a valid reason as to the justification of Vegetto's redirection. If you can tell me personally as to why you are redirecting this article, then that will be fine! Or, you can direct me to the person or people who are in charge, and let me talk to them. I believe this character is quite important, and he deserves his own article. So what do you choose to do? Would you like to talk it out right here, and come to an agreement? Or find some other way? The choice is yours my friend.  Gooden 20:37, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: He was on the list of characters to be merged, nobody disputed it after. He was merged. The end. That's all. Please don't drag this on. Nemu 20:40, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I have to drag this on. I don't see why you're doing this. You have yet to give me a valid reason as to your actions. I'm trying to talk with you on your reasoning. I believe i'm being fair. There are so many flaws in your case right now, it's not even funny anymore. I'm afraid if you do no provide a valid justification as to why you are redirecting this article, i'm going to use force. I do not want to go that direction. I'm a nice guy, just talk to me. Why are you doing this? Just because nobody said "hey, wait up" doesn't mean you should not stop! Please talk to me now! Thanks! Gooden 20:49, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Because, it was decided by WP:DBZ (about 20 regular people), that all characters on the merge list would be merged because of not being notable, having a small article, and various other reasons. This isn't a very hard concept. If you had actually read the discussion, you would know. Nemu 20:57, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes but WHERE! Where was this finalized? You're giving me a link to all this talking, all this disputes. To be honest with you, i don't give a dam about opinions. Give me the link to the blatant proof of this article being affirmed of redirection. THAT YOU HAVE SO FAR FAILED TO DO! And just what kind of MERGE LIST are you talking about? As far as i'm concerned, currently THERE IS NOTHING UNDER THE MERGE LIST. Once again, please tell or give me proof as to your actions! Gooden 21:06, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you sure you read the entire discussion? There was a list of articles to be merged, Vegetto and many others were on that list. And almost everyone was in favor of redirecting those characters to the various lists.--SUIT양복 21:10, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a point where it was on the list. If you had read it, you would know that they were taken off after being merged. Nemu 21:14, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Ok good! I understand that now. So Vegetto was a candidate on the merging list, fine. Now here is my next question: "Where is the verdict?" Where does it say that Vegetto will be redirected to a shorter less informed section because....? Because currently, i see more people against this action than for it. If you can provide justified proof of this, then i'm all yours! Gooden 21:20, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

text: You are annoying. Read the discussion. It clearly says all articles that aren't disputed at the end will be merged. Nemu 21:25, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

text: The discussion is over. Nobody else disputed it. You're out of luck. Start a discussion on the project talk page asking for opinions. Nemu 21:36, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Let's Think before we act