Talk:Altamont Corridor Express

message: this article is purely start class. to become B class under wiki calif proj stds it needs more breadth including: history, route elevations, ridership, fare structure, ecology on route and associated references and images. Anlace 22:24, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds good.  However, make sure that it is clear that it's temporary and that a bus bridge is available.  Thanks.  --Nlu (talk) 02:25, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: I think a map would be useful here, I know on other pages people have used SVG I have lat/lon data for the ACE route which I used to make http://www.stanford.edu/~jvittes/bayareatransit4.html I can send someone the lat/long data if they wish. I may look into SVG myself though if nobody contacts me. --JVittes 23:04, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Here is a map, I allow anyone to use it for any purpose, and release it to public domain. . Here  is the SVG I used to make it, again, I allow anyone to use it for any purpose, and release it to public domain. --JVittes 07:28, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Excellent map!  You should upload it to commons, and tag it PD-Self, so that we can use it on the various Wikimedia projects.  --CComMack (t•c) 20:05, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  map is available at: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:ACE_map_2.png, released to public domain. --JVittes 22:58, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map 

message: I know it's not the greatest source, but accoriding to San Jose Mercury News, the average weekday ridership (not that there is weekend service) is 2,973 for June 2006. I was thinking of mentioning the ridership levels somewhere. --JVittes 16:25, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ridership Numbers 

message: In June of last year the following change was made:
"Tracks are owned by Union Pacific, and ACE frequently experiences long delays as a result."
was changed to 
"Despite the fact that the tracks ACE runs on are owned by Union Pacific, ACE rarely experiences long delays as a result."
This sentence needs to be rewritten. ACE does have an poor on-time performance. So far this month it is at 77%. The rewrite in June seems to be a pro - Union Pacific position. There is ample evidence that many of their delays are caused by Union Pacific.
Tuyvan 06:50, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delays 

message: :Image:ACE Logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 04:10, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:ACE Logo.gif

message: As the above comment mentioned, there's a good deal of info that seems stuck 2 to 3 years in the past on this article. Heck, even the dropping of the midday round trip is poorly shoehorned in and still treated like a future event, after the dates given. I implore anyone who keeps a local eye on this service to also keep an eye on this article. As an east coast guy checking this article to learn about the system in the first place, I am left with a very sketchy and dated understanding. 
On a semi-related note, does anyone else find that the routebox template appears excessively wide, making reading the text difficult? oknazevad (talk) 05:31, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article needs updating 

message: According to this site Altamont Commuter Express will change its name to Altamont Corridor Express and will start using a new logo.  In October 2013 the 15 year anniversary of the service will be celebrated. Pedro Xing (talk) 05:16, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  name change and rebranding 

message: Ace is helping to get North Valley Rail established. This would be passenger rail service from Sacramento to Chico. I think this should be included in this page. I tried to add a sentence but it was reverted. https://www.trains.com/trn/news-reviews/news-wire/proposal-seeks-to-launch-commuter-rail-service-north-of-sacramento-calif/ Thehusband (talk) 19:43, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Thehusband: ACE is not "helping to get it established". This proposed service would terminate as the same station as the proposed ACE station. Worth mentioning on Natomas/Sacramento Airport station, but not here. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:21, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  North Valley Rail