Talk:BCPA Flight 304

message: Shouldn't this article have an infobox on the right that is used for all airline incidents and accidents? Paris456 00:30, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I recently interviewed, in person, the BCPA Station Manager on duty the day of the crash of RESOLUTION and he stated .........
Do not delete these important historic facts. The station manager is alive and well, living in New Zealand and would verify such statements ! Resolution Man (talk) 20:20, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletions re Kapell and death of passengers

message: I have started a transcription project for the accident investigation report. .  It is over on a sister project, wikisource, so you will need to create an account there. John Vandenberg (chat) 10:37, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks.  On wikisource, there is a yellow button near the save button which permits the contributor to mark a page as proofread, or "verified" as the second pass.  I have roughly verified a few, and constructed a unified text: s:BCPA Flight 304 accident investigation report which can now be used as an authoritative source.
I have now proofed read page 3 and marked it as such. I have also gone back to page 2 and inserted the missing words from the bottom of the page so that it now runs on correctly into page 3. Hope this is helpful. Ruths9396 (talk) 14:55, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

text: On this Wikipedia page, I have marked two sentences as being sourced to the investigation.  Keep adding "" to the end of any sentence which comes from this source.  We will then be left sentences which are based on some other source. John Vandenberg (chat) 13:27, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Civil Aeronautics Board Accident Investigation Report

message: I can't be bothered anymore with this banter.  I am an expert on this crash and if you don't take my word for what I KNOW to be factual contributions, then I don't have time to waste convincing "doubting Thomas' "  I am not angry anymore...just tired of this tech. talk ! CASE CLOSED !Resolution Man (talk) 18:00, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It is not a case of doubting Thomas - Wikipedia is a tertiary source.  Dont worry with the tech talk; that will soon pass once we have touched up the technical aspects of the article.  Then we will be begging for domain knowledge to assist us. John Vandenberg (chat) 05:54, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: UNBELIEVABLE RED TAPE

message: I do not toss off 'opinions'....I post facts.
No other person here, commenting, has a connection to RESOLUTION...so why would you even question what I contribute ?? You folk seem bent on spoiling readers interest ! I cannot fathom your motives ! I mean that !! I cannot understand why you would foil me at every turn....but I will say you have worn me down !  It is hardly worth my time anymore...and for those to whom I could have imparted "loads of info" on this crash, forgive me...I am tired....very tired !Resolution Man (talk) 22:49, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: NOT OPINIONS

message: Do not remove this info.  RUTHS : Call the FAA at SFO airport.  These figures were released by rep. from that location. It is also a Geo-Cache position...use your Garmin, Ruths.Resolution Man (talk) 19:01, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: ResolutionMan, pleas read up on proper formating of posts on Wikipedia before your further use.  Ruths9396, I can vertify the crash site coords as I have been been there as well in the last month or so.  The placement of the geocache does not warrant placement on this webpage as it has nothing to do with the actual event.  Post it on geocaching.com, not Wikipedia. Check-Six (talk) 19:49, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: VERIFICATION OF CO-ORDINATES

message: Why do you two CONTINUE to spoil my posts of interesting information ??  Have you some reason I do not know about that you CONTINUE this vandalism ?? This site is intersting to those interested...why hold back info. that NEITHER of YOU really care about ??? And a geocache has "nothing" to do with the crash...??? Get off it, this is WHERE it happened...reason enough to post the info.
Where can I report your deleting ???....bet you won't give me THAT info.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Resolution Man (talk • contribs) 21:27, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: HERE WE GO AGAIN !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

message: ...."not undocumented trivia" :):)....Not from me....I am the source, so nothing has been written down before this so I am the origin of the info. Chicken or the egg....it has to begin somewhere !!
Enjoy the holidays, lads ! (talk • contribs) 
:Which Wikipedia expressly forbades - as previously discussed. Check-Six (talk) 22:03, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: NO FURTHER COMMENT...at this time !!

message: I was just granted permission to place an official plaque to the passengers and crew "on the mountain" and it will be erected within six months of this date!  A great Christmas present for me and all those who have helped me reach my goal !Resolution Man (talk) 21:20, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Congrats - but please refrain from redacting the 'discussion' page. They are a matter of record for Wikipedia sake. Check-Six (talk) 00:39, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: LATEST NEWS

message: Hello! I read the edit summary in regards to this article. I added the New Zealand project because the airline, British Commonwealth Pacific Airlines, was a joint venture of Australia, New Zealand, and the UK. With multinational airlines I typically put all of the countries' WikiProjects if there is an accident involving said airline. For example, Linate Airport disaster has the WikiProjects of not only Italy (where the accident occurred) but also of Sweden, Denmark, and Norway, because SAS is a multinational airline of those three countries. WhisperToMe (talk) 21:29, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I see. Thank you for the clarification. Schwede66 21:35, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Zealand project