lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hung Shui Kiu

message: I am surprised to read the newspaper Wah Kiu Yat Po from year 1966, that claims Hung Shui Kiu is an important town. It also claims there were 20,000 people lived in the area that surrounding the town. Compare to Sai Kung Town, nowadays still have 10,000 population only, this wiki article should improve the history of the town before it was announced to be the next high-rise new town development in the 2010s. Matthew hk (talk) 13:43, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:SummerSlam (2007)/Archive 1

message: The two dates listed in this article are contradicting.  Which one is correct? Eric42 22:52, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: SummerSlam 2006 is on August 20th, this is about SummerSlam 2007. Learn to read, and sign your posts. TJ Spyke 22:00, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

message: Where is the link from WWE that its location has been moved? TJ Spyke 00:33, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location 

message: Did anyone see the poster that I saw with Cena and Triple H facing off one it. Anyone know if it's real or fake gravediggerfuneral
:The only poster i've seen had Rey Mysterio on it. No poster has been released by WWE, so any you see are most likely fake (although in the past I have seen some very good fake posters that looked real). TJ Spyke 03:19, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Poster

message: WWE was running promos this past week.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nign0g1 (talk • contribs) 
:It's not notable. Besides, we have no (confirmed) info on which members will be there or what they will be doing. TJ Spyke 21:20, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not focusing, it just mentions them (and briefly). TJ Spyke 02:33, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

text: We don't really include stuff like that in PPV articles. If they wrestle in a match or somehow are involved in a match (like interfering or being in the corner with a wrestler), they may end up being included. Hell, they might be noted anyways in the note section after the PPV. Right now though, there isn't anything worth noting. So we may end up noting their involvement (depending on what they do), but not yet. TJ Spyke 03:48, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Why no Jackass info?

message: Are you sure that this is the real poster? On the tv-add, the Summerslam logo is different than in that poster. --84.249.219.50 16:41, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The poster is right from iN DEMAND's website, so I doubt it's fake (since i've never seen them post a fake poster). It may not end up being the final one, but it's not fake. TJ Spyke 22:28, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, usually iN DEMAND's are not fake, but I think it should be changed, cause like the IP said it looks photoshoped. -- Kings bibby win 22:40, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

text: It's also on WWE's official affiliates page: http://www.wweaffiliates.com/images/300x450sslam07.jpg. Chuck Quizmo 01:37, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poster is fake? 

message: Bam Margera wont be albe to make it due to his liver injury --User:Atomic Religione
:And? It hasn't been confirmed which of the Jackasses (using it both ways) will be there. TJ Spyke 00:01, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: And if it has, is their a source. BTW, good one TJ Spyke. (haha) -- Kings bibby win 22:37, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bam 

message: What is this mean???? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.244.187.103 (talk • contribs) 
:A vandal added it. Lrrr IV 02:19, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edge VS Finlay????
Talk:Khlong Saen Saep boat service

message: The top section of this page seems to be significantly plagiarized from http://khlongsaensaep.com/about-history.html. Or maybe the Khlong Saen Saep's official website plagiarized Wikipedia. I'm not sure, so I'm just going to point it out here.
As of 19 January 2016, the text from the boat service's website is as follows:
----
The Khlong Saen Saep Express Boat service operates on the Khlong Saen Saep in Bangkok, providing fast, inexpensive transportation through the city's traffic-congested commercial districts. The service has a checkered reputation, due to the polluted water in the khlong and the haphazard nature in which the service is operated.
The 18-kilometre route is served by 100 boats of 40-50 seats, and operates 5:30am to 8:30pm daily on weekdays (7pm at the weekend). Prices are 8 to 20 baht, depending on distance travelled. The service carries about 60,000 passengers per day. It is run by a company called Family Transport.
----
And the top section of this article is as follows:
----
The Khlong Saen Saep Express Boat service operates is a fast, inexpensive ferry service on the Khlong Saen Saeb in Bangkok through the city's traffic-congested commercial districts. The service has a checkered reputation due to the polluted water in the canal and the haphazard nature in which the service is operated.
The 18-kilometre route is served by 100 boats of 40-50 seats, and operates from 5:30am to 8:30pm daily on weekdays (7pm at the weekend). Prices are 8 to 20 baht, depending on distance traveled. The service carries about 60,000 passengers per day. It is run by a company called Family Transport.
----
They're not identical, but they're extremely similar.
ToddBradley (talk) 12:39, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I doubt the operators would consciously advertise their own checkered reputation and the polluted water. The site was first crawled by the Internet Archive in 2013; Wikipedia's dates to 2007. It's most likely the site copied from Wikipedia. Legal action could be considered, but I think the hilarity of the situation is quite enough punishment. --Paul_012 (talk) 11:37, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  massive plagiarism
Talk:Hart House Debating Club

message: If anybody actually ends up reading this article, and before you complain about it, know that this is a work in progress.  I'm currently working on rewriting and expanding the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Squishy bananas (talk • contribs) 
:I will put the actual disclaimer tag on there. If you need any help give me a call. And remember citation's are the heart and soul of Wikipedia! :-) ScarianTalk 18:05, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Disclaimer

message: I see no good reason for this to be a stand alown page, All but the last line is repeated at Hart_House (University of Toronto)#Hart House Debating Club - I will add that line to the main page and set this as a redirect - if anyone later wishes to expand this from a stub feel free. Codf1977 (talk) 12:23, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Stand Alone
Talk:List of fictitious kings in Korean genealogies

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved   (t · c) buidhe 06:20, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: List of legendary monarchs of Korea →  – As seen in articles Gyuwon Sahwa and Hwandan Gogi, the Dangun kinglist presented here is a twentieth-century pseudohistorical fabrication. (The Dongguk Tonggam, a reliable primary source, only mentions three kings.) As fictitious characters in texts not even a hundred years old, they are hardly "legendary." It is my opinion that the entire Dan'gun king list fails WP:NOTABILITY, but if others disagree I'm fine with keeping the section and moving it to "List of monarchs in the Hwandan Gogi" or somesuch.
The Gija Joseon king list and Mahan king list are copied from the (also fictitious) jokbo of the Cheongju Han descent group. The Cheongju Hans have laid claim to descent from Jizi since the early seventeenth century (first relevant document 1617, although as late as 1508 the Cheongju Hans did not believe themselves to be descended from Jizi, per Kang Min-sik 2013). The Haengju Gi and Taewon Seonu descent groups also claim descent from Jizi and these forty-nine fictitious kings up to "King Won of Mahan".
The fact that the Gija Joseon king list is several hundred years old could justify its notability, but a list of kings mentioned only in the genealogy of three fairly minor descent groups is hardly a "list of legendary monarchs of Korea".
The Bukbuyeo kings are from Gyuwon Sahwa or Hwandan Gogi and IMO should be deleted.
I therefore propose that all sections except "List of Gija's heirs in Gojoseon" and "Mahan" be deleted for failing WP:NOTABILITY (or moved to their own article), and that the remaining section be moved to "List of fictitious kings in Korean genealogies" with an introductory section summarizing how these three descent groups came to have these fictitious genealogies. Karaeng Matoaya (talk) 09:35, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 18 June 2020 

message: Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia. Just a note about your recent edit; the kings you added back, with the exception of Buru, are ones universally recognized in historical scholarship as fictitious twentieth-century fabrications from pseudohistorical works (위서) such as the Hwandan gogi and the Gyuwon sahwa. They are not even fabricated figures who might still be notable due to their presence in Early Modern Korean genealogies (jokbo), as the Gija Joseon kings are; there is in fact not any evidence that anyone believed in them prior to the twentieth century. This is why they were removed.--Karaeng Matoaya (talk) 02:52, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Readdition of twentieth-century fabrications
Talk:Yeshiva Toras Moshe

message: Is the Rabbi Nachum Persovich listed of Mir, which is spelled on Wikipedia as Nochum Partzovitz? KLdd15 (talk)   — Preceding undated comment added 10:34, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

message: could you please explain why you are violating WP:NPOV with your recent edits attacking YU? Thank you, Yoninah (talk) 21:03, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't understand your question.  The anti-Y.U. stance is a long-standing school policy, articulated as recently as last week by one of its faculty.  If you are concerned about people attacking YU, you should address your question to Dr. Meiselman or Mr. Kornreich.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kalman613 (talk • contribs) 04:01, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The yeshiva may oppose Y.U., but the way you phrased it in the article violates Wikipedia's policy against inserting point of view into articles. Also, the Slifkin Challenge blogspot is not a reliable reference, so I removed it. Anything that appears on Wikipedia must be neutral and balanced. Yoninah (talk) 10:11, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

text: It has nothing to do with who Kornreich is. Blogs are not acceptable sources on Wikipedia. Yoninah (talk) 13:08, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

text: Being a faculty member is actually not enough to consider the use of his self published material.-Serialjoepsycho- (talk) 00:21, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: YU diatribe
Talk:Mérida flowerpiercer

message: Diglossa in the  links to a DAB page. It should link to Diglossa (bird). Could someone who knows their way around the deeper recesses of the template fix this, please? (See also Slaty flowerpiercer; those are the only two pages affected.) Narky Blert (talk) 12:32, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: ''Diglossa''
Talk:McDonald's Championship

message: I removed the sentence above. The analogy made no sense. It related to another sport, and there were no actual commonalities between the MscDo and the FIFA: local clubs are not countries, FIFA world cup is an established tournament, etc..  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.222.29.183 (talk) 05:44, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  It was somewhat equivalent to [[football (soccer)]]'s [[FIFA Club World Cup]], although smaller in scale.  
Talk:Muckie

message: This page makes no mention of the origin of "mucie":
That it is based on unusually large objects found during sonar scans of the lake, with the intent on measuring local fish stocks.  At least thats what I read in the newspaper.69.47.36.38 (talk) 22:31, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "Mucie"
Talk:Leviathan and the Air-Pump

message: Article is currently a chapter-by-chapter summary of the entire book. Very (very!) nicely done, but I don't think it's right for Wikipedia. Needs less paraphrasing of the book and OR interpretation, and more third-party sources. Publicly Visible (talk) 02:39, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multiple Issues April 2012 

message: Hi all, I am going to start working on this article. It has about a million reviews, some of which I added to further reading. The article should rarely if ever cite the book itself, that is what all the reviews are for. The reviews are secondary sources independent of the book and its authors, therefore they are reliable, the book and other content written by the authors is not reliable as they are not independent of the topic. Reviews that were not published need to be removed and reviews from non-notable persons should be given less weight (space) than reviews from notable persons. A great deal of original research needs to be removed and replaced with statements supported by the book's many reviews. I will work on it as I have time. Thanks! Footlessmouse (talk) 01:18, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: To really emphasize this, there are two articles I found published in 2017 in Isis that this whole article should be built on:  "The Reviews of Leviathan and the Air-Pump : A Survey" and  "A Second Look: Leviathan and the Air-Pump : Editor's Introduction" everything else is supplementary information at this point. This is an ideal book article precisely because there is a tertiary source that has summarized the reception for us and extensive literature analyzing the book's style, themes, and content. There should be no primary sources used here at all. Footlessmouse (talk) 01:23, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Issues December 2020
Talk:Resting spore

message: Resting spores are not the same as Chlamydospores. This page and the Chlamydospore page need serious help, but the two topics should remain separate, imo. TelosCricket (talk) 20:42, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: If the community decides to merge the two articles, Chlamydospore should be subsumed under resting spore. TelosCricket (talk) 20:44, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Merge
Talk:Taras Filenko

message: I believe that I have added in this work all that I am capable. I hereby declare it ready for tweaking :) Pianoman7692 23:17, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Initial Completion of Article 
Talk:James Renner

message: His work "Amy: The Search for Her Killer" is an amaing account of investigative journalism. The book reveals many important facts previously not disclosed to the public and certainly will be an aid in the State of Ohio finally arresting and prosecuting the heinous murder of this young girl. Deleting his entry from the Wiki is a disservice to those of us who use Wikipedia for the first stop for clear and concise information on the web.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.228.78.3 (talk) 20:05, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  James Renner has created an important work of investigative jouralism 

message: Yeah, this guy has shown a pattern of third person self-promotion.  If someone else who is not obviously him finds his biography worthy of being typed up then so be it, but what's on here is clearly penned by it's subject.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.231.57.157 (talk) 06:08, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: James Renner has created an important work of investigative journalism. His work "Amy: The Search for Her Killer" is an amaing account of investigative journalism. The book reveals many important facts previously not disclosed to the public and certainly will be an aid in the State of Ohio finally arresting and prosecuting the heinous murder of this young girl. Deleting his entry from the Wiki is a disservice to those of us who use Wikipedia for the first stop for clear and concise information on the web.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.228.78.3 (talk) 20:05, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  It would probably be much longer if it was an autobiography, and since it has references to back it up, the article will certainly be kept. --GouramiWatcher (Gulp) 23:47, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delete it
Talk:Benfotiamine

message: Can anyone confirm Benfotiamine's solubility? The article lists it as lipophilic (fat soluble), yet the solubility chart at the bottom of the page lists it as water soluble. Other online articles also indicate that it is fat soluble. As far as I know, these are mutually exclusive categories, but I could be wrong.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.135.62.123 (talk) 20:06, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Per my understanding, benfotiamine is a special fat-soluble form of B1. B1 is typically only water soluble. Note that a substance can also be fat and water soluble, although there is no indication that benfotiamine is such a substance. --IO Device (talk) 18:42, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

text: benfotiamine is a fat soluble form of thiamine. B1 is tradiitonally considered water soluble because most B1 is in the thiamine form. So, technically your articles are correct. But the one that labels B1 as water soluble is talking about regular thiamine. The ones calling it fat soluble are referring to benfotiamine.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.203.61.192 (talk) 22:12, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Solubility 

message: I have Wörwag Pharma produced milgamma and it contains B6 vitamin. How can it be another name for the Benfotiamine (B1)? --85.253.98.60 (talk) 18:32, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: there are various combination drugs as the article now describes. all of them contain benfo, per the refs. Jytdog (talk) 23:26, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Milgamma 

message: As of October 2018, this study published in 2016 is still the most recent human study about taking oral Benfotiamine for a long time. 300mg/day benfotiamine given to Alzheimer patients for 18 months. No other doses were tested so it is impossible to know the optimal dose yet.
Impressive benefits, but only 5 humans participated in the study!
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27696179
Can someone say anything about impact factor or other reliability score of the journal where the research was pusblished? 
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=%22Neurosci+Bull%22[Title+Abbreviation]
And reliability of the authors? Authors were all Chinese people.
There are some interesting animal studies about Benfotiamine & Type 2 diabetes etc, one can read them at Pubmed website.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Benfotiamine
--ee1518 (talk) 10:30, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alzheimer & Benfotiamine
File talk:Population growth rate world.PNG

message: bots wanna does not have a declining population its due to cross over 2 million people by the end of the spring of this year 2010 WHEN THIS WAS MADE IT HAD A POPULATION OF 1.8 MILLION. NOW GRANTED THERES ALOT OF ELBO ROOM IN BOTSWANA BUT ITS STILL BECOMING MORE CROWDED AND NOT DECLING AS INDICATED ON THIS MAP.
99.51.212.6 (talk) 03:20, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, Botswana should be coloured green, not purple. --Roentgenium111 (talk) 17:55, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Botswana 

message: from 2009 to 2010 the population of Japan has a hugh decrese of nearly one million people casue japan has almost no major imigration and falling birth rates and a large elderly population.
99.51.212.6 (talk) 00:07, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  japan 

message: I saw moldavia had the fastest declining population growth , yet on the map it's blue? plz change it  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bezuidenhout (talk • contribs) 16:51, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moldavia
Talk:Pioneers (missions agency)

message: The article says:
"Pioneers seeks to mobilize teams to glorify God in unreached peoples by initiating church-planting movements in partnership with local churches." 
Is this unbiased? The language reminds me of "advertising".
Also, it seems somewhat illogical that a people may be unreached yet have local churches in their midst. I would suggest a knowledgeable editor rewrite at least this part of the entry. Denis (talk) 18:00, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV
Talk:Magnetic Hill Zoo

message: This is not a B-class article, which by definition should be "almost ready got Good Article Nomination." It is not even close to being cited well enough (the rule of thumb I use for zoo articles is 4 citations for start, 8-10 for C, and 15-20 for B, though this is flexible if other aspects are spectacular). It is also missing an "Exhibits" section (all it has is a list of animals), an "Other facilities" section, and a "The future" section. It also does not have any pictures of the zoo -- all the pictures are closeups of animals that could be anywhere. Please see the WPZOO rating criteria in the banner. It fails four of five criteria. I will leave it as C for now, though normally I would not even upgrade it to C-class without more thorough citations. Donlammers (talk) 00:59, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:Assyrians in Russia

message: I would love to find out the burial place that happened in 1928 of this person:
John daniels from Geloo 2601:642:4B80:81C0:1CE3:7F96:7DA1:834 (talk) 07:18, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Burial place of  assirian people in Moscow
Talk:Yeshivah Gedolah Zal

message: The edits I made were not due to POV problems.  I changed the writing style to be more encyclopedic and I removed the names that were not major admins.  I'd like undo this diff but will wait for comments.  If a different edit that accomplishes the same goal of an encyclopedic tone is suggested that would also work.  Thanks Joe407 (talk) 15:05, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I see. Can you please explain why you think that the detail about the admin. should be omitted? Yehoishophot Oliver (talk) 01:22, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: From what I've seen on WP, university articles do not give a comprehensive list of faculty, but rather will list top administrators and perhaps a few independently notable faculty.  The same holds true for primary and secondary schools.  There is no need to list each 3rd grade teacher or high school coach.  I feel the same should hold true for yeshivos.  For a yeshiva, the key players should be listed:  Rosh yeshiva, mashgiach, (in this case also the mashpia), and if there are independantly notable rabbonim then they should be noted as "notable faculty".  What I saw in this article was a list of every rebbe.  I'm sure that Rabbi Mordechai Szmerling and Rabbi Shmuel Lesches are wonderful rabbeim but I don't think that they need to be noted in an encyclopedia article about YG.  If you take a look at the diff in question you'll see that I left the main admins both current and founding.  Does this sound ok to you? Joe407 (talk) 05:16, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I see what you're saying and accept it. Though you left out the part about Reb Zalman Serebryanski, who was definitely a founding admin. Yehoishophot Oliver (talk) 17:23, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.  And Reb Serebryanski is there.  Thank you for your input. Joe407 (talk) 05:13, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:   Administration