Talk:Board of Deputies of British Jews

message: This is a good article, but it really needs to be more heavily sourced.Jamal (talk) 23:22, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: References?

message: Yours truly,--Ludvikus 16:01, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: old talk

message: *Sharon Sadeh, Palestinian charity sues British Jewry over terror slur reprinted from Haaretz, March 25, 2004.
::I'm embarassed I didn't even notice it was a David Irving page since his name is all over it. On the other hand it is an interesting test of conclusions reached in these four Reliable Source Board discussions on Reprints of Reliable Source articles, documents by less or non-reliable sources:  #1,  #2,  #3,  #4
::And of course one can always just take off the link!
*As for the Interpal press release: "InterPal wins Libel Case Against Board of Deputies of British Jews," Interpal, News release 22 December 2005, accessed 9 February 2007. 
::Meanwhile this is what has been said about Organizations Quotes about self, press releases:  #1,  #2 
Anyway there do seem to be other sources, especially on the press release. When I get a chance. CarolMooreDC (talk) 08:38, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources of Interpal Suit vs. Board

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Board of Deputies of British Jews. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131023155653/http://www.bod.org.uk/live/content.php?Category_ID=14 to http://www.bod.org.uk/live/content.php?Category_ID=14
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:10, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Can editors please provide justification for the assertion that sources 13 and 14 are unreliable. This assertion seems equally partisan and arbitrary.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.179.208.92 (talk) 22:15, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unreliable sources 

message: On the article about the Catholic Church, for example, we mention the activities of misbehaving priests, not only in the body of the article, but in the introduction. Shouldn't the same be applied here, in regards to Mr. Greville Janner, who actually led this organisation? Claíomh Solais (talk) 14:22, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greville Janner's alleged misbehaviour 

message: I reverted this + added a secondary source at some distance from events. continuing coverage of this does not mention Livingstone's relationship with the Evening Standard (or Daily Mail), and this is irrelevant to the Board's protest over this language. Icewhiz (talk) 07:14, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edits 

message: This is quite a long list and rather dominates the article; I do not see such a list in articles on other organizations. Perhaps it should be made into a new separate article. Jontel (talk) 06:54, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Give list of past presidents its own article?