Talk:Sisyphus

message: Shouldn't this be the page first linked to, instead of the Pink Floyd song of the same name??? EunuchOmerta 03:28, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: There is an Irish example of this myth, 'Salisbury Sisyphus', 1887. Type this into google and you will find an old newspaper article in which the Sisyphus punishment is compared to the the punishment like trouble of fixing the problems of Ireland. It is an interesting and historic reference to the myth and should be included.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.44.79.15 (talk) 22:18, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Irish example

message: Right now it says: "When Hades came to fetch him, Sisyphus put him into fetters, so that no one died till Ares came, freed Hades, and delivered Sisyphus into his custody." But I had understood it was not Hades but Thanatos who came for Sisyphus http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thanatos That would also make more sense. (The Dutch and German versions of this page both mention Thanatos as well in this context)
(I've changed it, the above now only is what it said before)
:Right now it says: "Zeus then ordered Hades to chain Sisyphus in Tartarus. Sisyphus slyly asked Thanatos to try the chains to show how they worked. When Thanatos did so..." -- This is starting to make no sense.  Did Thanatos just show up after Zeus asked Hades to do it?  I don't care if it was Thanotos or Hades but this is hard to read.  I am going to change the first "Hades" to "Thanatos" so that it reads consistently.  If anyone sees fit to change it back, make sure it still makes sense. -- abfackeln (talk) 21:52, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Thanatos or Hades

message: Currently there is a piece of the intro that says "Today, Sisyphean can be used as an adjective meaning that an activity is unending and/or repetitive. It could also be used to refer to tasks that are pointless and unrewarding." The second sentence seems repetive and seems to overlook the meaning that Albert Camus lent the tale in his essay The Myth of Sisyphus. Unless there is an objection, I'd like to remove the second sentence and replace it, so that the paragraph reads: "Today, Sisyphean can be used as an adjective meaning that an activity is unending and/or repetitive.  To those familiar with Albert Camus, the term may also refer to a sense of contentment following such an activity." Alphachimera (talk) 14:17, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Introduction

message: Currently there is a piece of the intro that says "Today he is seen as fictional though the Ancient Greeks believed in him." I would think that is obvious the Greeks believed the myth. Also, "Today he is seen as fictional" is a pretty big assumption with no proof that no Zeus worshippers exist today. I'm going to delete it. Lesssthan (talk) 20:56, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Myth 

message: Maybe Wikipedia needs a second spoiler template that says ENORMOUS UNNECESSARY SERIES-RUINING SPOILER WARNING instead?
Seriously, isn't that a seriously big spoiler for an article that isn't actually about Dark Tower or Stephen King? My eyes completely skipped past the spoiler template. I was planning on reading that series, too.. --Kalthare 06:32, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If there's no objection, I'm going to remove the Dark Tower spoiler. --Kalthare 22:12, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dark Tower 

message: Anyone any idea why the 'biog' section was removed (11th September), wholesale? Without it, the whole Sisyphus business loses its sense and the current very brief allusion neither does the story justice nor supplies the punter with the reasons for the punishment of Sisyphus. Furthermore, the article is supposed to be about Sisyphus, after all. - Ballista 05:07, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There has got to be some better word that can be used than "Biography", which rather makes it seem like Sisyphus was a living person. Robert K S 06:00, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biog of Sisyphus removed - why? 

message: I've always found this dynamic gif a nice succinct summary of the Sisyphus legend. --Dunstan talk 10:36, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sisyphus Legend - a Summary

message: I like the animated gif.  Anyway, the references in the article are not listed at the end of the article.  Does anyone have the information to add them?--Kenneth M Burke 02:16, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: Can anyone define the "solar theory" which is referenced by this article?  It links to solar deity which does not explain it. -- Beland 17:29, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like the "solar theory" bit is a direct-quoted remnant of of the EB1911 text.  Lacking proper citation, that text should probably be obviated away with a more cogent, attributable analysis. Robert K S 19:52, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Solar theory 

message: Sisyphus is the Latinised form of the Greek name Sisyphos. The article should be renamed to that and Sisyphus should redirect to this page. All references of Sisyphus in the text should be changed to Sisyphos. Although this guy is well known by his Latinized name the article should use the real one.
Gerd Eichler  —Preceding undated comment was added at 07:54, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No. — Chameleon 01:51, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: Heracles is listed in the section "Other figures in Greek mythology punished by the gods include:".  Is this accurate?  How was he punished?  Did I miss something? -- abfackeln (talk) 22:13, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Heracles punished?

message: This article seems heavily concerned with how cool Zeus is in comparison with Sisyphus. Can someone please remove this bizarre bias?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.41.76.193 (talk) 20:42, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  no POV 

message: The actual recited myth mentions no boulders at all. --193.166.137.75 (talk) 06:09, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Bad continuity

message: Triangle is given as an example of Sisyphus in popular culture without any details regarding this being given. The article for the film makes no mention of anything of this sort, either. Can anyone knowledgable of the movie provide some indication of why it should be mentioned here? Ravenicus451 (talk) 15:46, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed a mention of Triangle being a "retelling" of the story. It is not. The myth is mentioned in the film. I don't think this is the location to have a list of any film, story, book, etc that references a particular mythos.AbramTerger (talk) 20:13, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Triangle (2009 film) in Popular Culture

message: There is a homophonic error in the article where it refers to the tv episodes featuring Sisyphus. It says that he slept with another man's wife in order for her to 'bare' a child to be his heir, where 'bear' is in fact what she would do.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.83.133.250 (talk) 18:43, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error 

message: I changed the pronunciation from /ˈsɪsəfəs/ to /sɪsɪˈfʌs/. The main difference being in how to pronounce the "y". This letter is pronounced in all sorts of different ways in English: as /eɪ/ ( like the pronoun, I, e.g. dynamic), as /ɪ/ (like i in in, eg. amethyst) or as /ʌ/ (like a u in us, e.g. bathycolpian — can't think of a better example, sorry—). The OED gives the "y" as the "i" from "is", while here it was as "u" from "bus". I have only heard it as the former and not like the latter, so must concur with the OED. Minor differences are regional, as some parts of the US will read "us" as  /əs/ not /ʌs/; the same goes for the "y" which may be read /ɨ/ — there is little difference between /ɪ/ and /ɨ/. --Squidonius (talk) 23:23, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests February 2012 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant 
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:09, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Sisyphus Modern Interpretation.jpg Nominated for Deletion

message: "Ephyra (elder name of Corinth)"
While the word 'elder' is technically correct the usage is archaic. Why not just use the word 'older'? It's clearer and clarity is always preferred in expository texts. This sort of pedantry stops the reader in his tracks while he questions the author's motive: did he wish to demonstrate his erudition or to add a certain tone to the article, maybe the author is not a native speaker of the language, maybe he's a D&D aficianado. Who knows? But the point is it interrupts the flow and induces the reader to add a new section to the talk page. If in doubt consult a style manual, there are many to choose from and they all agree:  never use an archaic term when a perfectly good modern equivalent exists.75.157.135.57 (talk) 05:39, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: You realize that you don't need to make a whole new talk section for a non-controversial, one-letter change to the article, right? You can just edit it yourself. This page isn't protected. It almost seems as though you're talking about yourself with the whole "This sort of pedantry stops the reader in his tracks while he questions the author's motive: did he wish to demonstrate his erudition or..."  -- Fyrefly  (talk) 16:57, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Ha ha. You got it in one Fyrefly. It's my sport, it's my hobby, it's my curse. The hand of God came down and smote me and He said, "Be critical, be very, very critical." To which I replied, "Redundant intensifiers are bad style. One 'very' will do."75.157.135.57 (talk) 09:49, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pointless archaic pedantry? 

message: The entire content of the box is incidental, at best, to this article about Sisyphus. Does anyone object if I remove it? 81.135.67.84 (talk) 17:25, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why does this article contain an info box about the Greek Underworld? 

message: Well, where is the misunderstanding about someone being a parent and someone being a child and not to exclude any one else someone being a relative. It would be interesting to how is it to undo something that is so fundamental--relastions. How can you undo something such as who is and who is not your relative?
Oh, he gave his sperm but he is no longer my father since yesterday.66.74.176.59 (talk) 07:02, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: It is very difficult to understand what you are saying because your sentences are ungrammatical.  When a father and son are dead, that is in the past, so we say "X (father) was the father of Y (son)".  Please listen to others when point out issues with your edits since there appears to be issues with the use of English. --I am One of Many (talk) 07:42, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

text: Hi. I came here from Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style#Is or was. You may wish to join that discussion, since it’s explicitly about your edits. Anyway, while I agree with the logic behind your edits (death doesn’t end blood relations), Wikipedia’s style is to use past tense for the dead. (I don’t believe that applies in the case of this article, since mythological beings like Sisyphus never actually lived, but that’s beside the point.) But rules can change; maybe we should use present tense for blood relations. That MOS talk page would be a great place to get people talking about it and considering it. —174.141.182.82 (talk) 15:14, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "He was the father of Glaucus" 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Sisyphus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://religionandscience.sites.yale.edu/about-us
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:27, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: As far as I can tell, Kierkegaard does not mention Sisyphus in any of his writings. The quote in the article does not mention him, the context of the quote does not mention him, nor does any other work of his that I can find. Therefore I am removing the reference to Kierkegaard from the article. OneGyT (talk) 20:00, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kierkegaard does not comment on Sisyphus 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Sisyphus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110629173245/http://www.oup.com/us/companion.websites/0195153448/studentresources/chapters/ch25/?view=usa to http://www.oup.com/us/companion.websites/0195153448/studentresources/chapters/ch25/?view=usa
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:40, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The article describes Sisyphus as a king of Ephyra, today known as Corinth.  This association between Ephyra and Corinth is debatable, and it seems to come exclusively from the research of Sir James George Frazer, as footnoted and retrieved.  Following the link to Wiki's own article on Ephyra, you arrive at the page for Cichyrus, for which Ephyra was an earlier name.  This article makes no mention of Corinth (or Sisyphus, though it does detail a number of other myths associated with the city).  Likewise, the Corinth article describes no association with Ephyra or the Sisyphus myth.  Based on excavated ruins, the present-day location of Cichyrus/Ephyra seems to be in the area of Ioannina, which is quite a ways away from Corinth.  So, something is not right here. 
Aside from this particular issue, perhaps this demonstrates that the Sisyphus article should be reviewed and updated generally, as I worry it relies too much on the work of a 19th century mythology scholar not privy to 20th century archaeology or any other more recent and relevant work.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.156.136.229 (talk) 14:04, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location of Sisyphus' Kingdom 

message: I see no reason to have Sisyphus (dialogue) linked in the "see also" section. That page is linked in the disambiguation page already, and the name is the only thing that connects the pages. I'm removing it, and unless I get pushback here, I will revert future additions of the link and if they occur frequently I will add hidden text in the article alerting editors not to add it. OneGyT (talk) 22:22, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sisyphus dialogue in the see also section 

message: This page states that the king (Sisyphus) was punished by Hades this is incorrect, he was punished by Zeus tho roll the boulder uphill IN Hades.￼ Davekat1976 (talk) 15:41, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong, wrong, WRONG