Talk:Jingle All the Way

message: What?  That makes no sense.  I'm not even sure what whoever wrote that meant to say.  (Not to mention the mixture of American and British spellings.)  67.22.194.36 00:10, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticised for satirizing everything that is wrong? 

message: Way too long-whatever happened to the term "synopsis"?!160.81.133.194 19:23, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I wrote a much pithier plot. Dear, 69.122.155.216, I don't really think that such an enormous plot is necessary- do you? Bantosh 20:46, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guess someone wanted to write a novel! 

message: Whenever the edit ban is lifted please replace Twin Cities with Twin Cities.  Thank you.--Appraiser 19:09, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: whenever

message: I'm kinda sad this page sucks because Jingle had probably the best and most scenes filmed within the Twin Cities compared to other films taking place in Mpls which featured generic stuff and sometimes actually in greater MN not here. I'm surprised no one has really done anything to that point which is why I come to Wikipedia for movie stuff in the first place. But yes please change it to Twin Cities .:DavuMaya:. 14:20, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lawl 

message: Why is the running time listed as 103 min when it's really 88?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.253.64.213 (talk) 02:42, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Running time 

message: I am removing the Comment regarding Nostalgia Critic's reaction to the movie from the reception section. NC is a funny guy, but I wouldn't put his opinion to the same level as that of Roger Ebert or any of the more widely known film critics. If his opinion is warranted in the article one could then also argue the opinion of countless internet-based critics to be used in reception sections of film articles as well.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.253.69.199 (talk) 05:22, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nosalgia Critic 

message: For easy access: discussion on inclusion of a cast list between myself and , originally held largely between our talk pages. (If there is a fancier way of doing this, then someone can go right ahead) Gran2 22:32, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: They are already a lot of film articles that have cast sections as is, no matter how trivial and redundant some of the editors see it and it isn't like IMDB.com at all. It's not like every credit cast member are on those articles. BattleshipMan (talk) 19:49, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm sorry, but I don't really see how that is a valid reason. 'Other articles have it' is, as I have said, not automatically a valid reason. There are plenty of articles which don't have one (like Sense and Sensibility (film)). I have also supplied clear support from the WP:FILM guideline stating it is not necessary. As is, it is frankly confusing, as well as totally pointless, as you've listed the characters which only appear in the opening show-within-a-show scene, with no explanation of this. Unless you can show me clear policy or consensus support for it, I'm going to remove it. Gran2 19:59, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: You can't just like remove every cast sections in every film article, no matter how anybody would see how it is. They are already too many other film articles that have cast sections, despite how pointless some editors would see it. They are some cast sections that have brief characters descriptions on there as well. BattleshipMan (talk) 20:06, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Again, just because other articles have something doesn't mean they all should. I have supplied an example of another good article which doesn't. I have shown you, clearly, from the film guidelines, that it is not compulsory. When the article was passed as a good article, the cast list was not there. It was not there because it didn't need to be there. It still does not need to be there. It is not compulsory. Gran2 20:16, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: They are cast sections with actors that have reliable sources on an unknown number of film articles. That's another thing you should know about that. BattleshipMan (talk) 20:22, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: And again, I don't see what that has to do with this. I know. I know other articles have cast lists. That's fine. In a lot of articles, it works. They have nice cast lists with lots of real-world info. That's great. Other articles, like this one, don't do that, because they don't need to. As I have said, four times now, that other articles have something does not mean all articles must. For the fourth time, the policy says it is not compulsory. The policy says that including them in the plot is more than fine for cases like this and is much better than a simple, barren list. I'm sorry, but I'm really, really struggling to understand what your point is, other than that you like them. As said, they can be helpful, but not in this case. In this case it is pointless. And, again, as it is not in any way compulsory, it should not be included if it is pointless. Gran2 20:54, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cast list dispute 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jingle All the Way. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130524055753/https://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/c/F3/361/361.F3d.312.01-2721.01-2668.html to https://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/c/F3/361/361.F3d.312.01-2721.01-2668.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:43, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The redirect Put that cookie down now has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Utopes (talk / cont) 09:29, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Put that cookie down now]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]