Talk:University of St Andrews Students' Association

message: A bit top-heavy, don't ye think? 
Also, the SSC bit will need an overhall next year once we've figured out who's sitting on there for the Design Team, and Ents will have to go, but we can worry about that later. Lordrosemount 19:16, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Aye, agreed, David. Flagged it with the  tag, so someone bothers to sort it out, or I'll do it when I get a spare minute! M0RHI 19:31, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: comments

message: Per precedent of other Students Unions (eg everything in :Category:English students' unions, :Category:Scottish Students' Unions and :Category:Welsh students' unions) being listed (as distinct from a student club), this article should not be deleted. There are sections that are unverified and have been either removed or tagged with citation needed tags (per WP:V). There is notable information in here, but it needs to be developed, note deleted, and certainly not speedy deleted. Contested on reasons of notability comparable to the 60-odd other Students' Unions and Students' Associations listed on Wikipedia. M0RHI | Talk to me 19:02, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy deletion

message: I have declined to delete via speedy. It makes at least a claim to notability. If the notability is contested, the appropriate course is to take it to Afd.
:I agree that this is not for speedy. It is a poor article that needs a lot of improvement, but speedy is not the way to go about it. Emoscopes Talk 19:15, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. There are sections that need a good culling, and tidying up, but I think the edits made over the past 3-5 days have not been in the best of faiths from a neutral POV, and have detracted from the main article. I'll start a big tidy. M0RHI | Talk to me 19:17, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: speedy

message: I have taken the liberty to produce User:Discostu333/Student organisations to faciltate discussion and formulation of a finished article to go at Student organisations at St Andrews University. Any particularly contentious issues should be discussed before contribution / revert at User talk:Discostu333/Student organisations. I hope everyone will see fit to contribute and make this article constructive and suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia . M0RHI | Talk to me 23:51, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge article

message: The unregistered user 86.135.217.151 inappropriately reverted some constructive additions I made earlier today about the activities of the Association, for the spurious reason that the sources I had quoted were offline. I have reverted this reversion on the basis that WP:CITE states clearly that offline sources are acceptable, and should be cited in a manner similar to what I've used (though if any other editor wants to amend the formatting of the citation, they can naturally be my guest), and I would also refer the user to Help:Reverting which states, If what one is attempting is a positive contribution to Wikipedia, a revert of those contributions is inappropriate unless, and only unless, you as an editor possess firm, substantive, and objective proof to the contrary. Mere disagreement is not such proof. See also Wikipedia:Assume_good_faith.
If these reversions persist, I should consider them vandalism; can anyone advise on the correct procedure to take in this case? Lordrosemount 20:43, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If you believe you are correct in your assumptions that the information added is notable, and indeed does not detract from the article, please be bold and reinstate. If this continues, and breaks the Three Revert Rule, you may wish to seek guidance with the admins there. Else, if you believe this is vandalism, do report it to the administrator's board for vandalism. Providing things don't detract from the subject matter of the article, are not frivolous, and meet other Wikipedia policies, do be bold. M0RHI | Talk to me 00:34, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reversion

message: It might be old, but not the oldest in the world as Uppsala Student Union is 15 years older. 82.196.164.9 (talk) 12:30, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not the oldest in the world