lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Jutta Kleinschmidt

message: Kleinschmidt is cred '01 as being first woman to win the Dakar, & gave Mitsu their (record) 6h. She debut '95 as co-driver to Jean-Louis Schlesser.  Trekphiler 07:34, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Shpants

message: This deletion decision was nominated for review on 14 Dec 2005.  The review discussion is appended below.  As I sought to close out the deletion review, I discovered a number of factors which had not been addressed either in the original AFD nor in the Deletion Review.  First, the original "shpants" article was used as source material for the article now at Three quarter pants.  The existence of "three quarter pants" was substantiated during the original deletion discussion.  It's appropriateness for inclusion has never been challenged.  Since the contents of the article (at whatever name) were used to create an article that we apparently are keeping, we must preserve the attribution history in order to preserve GFDL.  Second, since the deletion, this page has been re-created as a redirect to Shpant - a dictionary definition of a Yiddish word (an article which itself was created since this discussion began).  On my own authority as an ordinary editor, I am transwiki-ing the Yiddish dicdef to Wiktionary and replacing it with a soft-redirect.
Having cleared up the shpant page, I return to the shpants page.  While there are several complicated and error-prone ways to preserve attribution history without preserving the history of the original article, I find no burning reason to go to all that extra work.  Redirects and disambiguation pages often serve as nothing more than mechanical pages to support our GFDL requirements.  The article history contains nothing patently offensive or even untrue except the assertion that the word "shpants" is associated with this product.  Accordingly, I am going to exercise my discretion and override the majority opinion of both the original AFD and of the Deletion Review discussions.  While the majority opinion was clearly in favor of deletion, I can not reconcile that decision with our requirement to preserve attribution history.  I am going to restore the history of the shpants article and remake it into a disambiguation page with links to both wikt:shpant and three quarter pants.  I will include a specific explanation of the reasons for doing so.
If someone really wants go through the alternative steps to perserve attribution history, then I will not object if the history of shpants is again deleted.  I also will not object to the re-deletion if three quarter pants is deleted.  Until then, however, this seems to be the cleanest solution.  Rossami (talk) 07:33, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Critical mass (software engineering)

message: Until coming across this article I'd not heard "critical mass" used in this way in reference to software. It doesn't seem that this is a widely accepted as the specific meaning of "critical mass" especially since it can be used in many ways, for example when achieving a "critical mass" of users. 
This article seems to assert authority from a single blog post, and so IMO this article probably shouldn't be here.
 - Catskul (talk) 17:31, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "critical mass" concept penetration/authority 

message: I added the Causes + Avoidance areas + wrote up some stuff off the top of my head that seems to apply. Might have some spelling errors. David Ashley 07:45, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: As content it is great, but the style is nonencyclopedic, I think. So great stuff, but must be rewritten to a more encyclopedic form. Specially the avoidance-section. An encyclopedia should not tell the user what to do or even talk to user at all. So changing it to passive would obviously be the first step. --Easyas12c 12:51, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Good points! Feel free to edit it or cut it mercelessly. I was just throwing some ideas out. David Ashley 16:54, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this page has now enought content. So I changed the expert-request to a clean up-request for the tone. --Easyas12c 00:24, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added some stuff 

message: While correcting the tone and cleaning up the article, sentence fixing one bug introduces one plus epsilon bugs was changed to fixing one bug can easily introduce several more bugs. The latter serves great as a loose explanation, but the earlier is the actual definition used in field of software engineering. I think the article should have it too. I'm just not sure how to add it again, and I still have not found a literal reference for the definition. --Easyas12c 10:02, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: While editing the article for tone, I was completely unable to find any reference to the "one plus epsilon" statement.  If you can find me a reference or expert which explains that, I can easily edit it back in.--Mmason 14:03, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The definition used in computer sciense 
Talk:Paul Blanshard

message: I recently did some research on Brand Blanshard and found your new article on his brother Paul informative and interesting.  Thanks for creating it.  Two suggestions: (1) At the end of your blockquote explicitly identify the work associated with "p. 4"; (2) in para 4, instead of saying "the book version" identify the book by name. WikiPedant 07:45, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Paul Blanshard was also an eugenist.Even in 1950 decade, his books and speaches were supporting eugenics.Agre22 (talk) 23:50, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Paul Blanshard was also an eugenist

message: The grammar and syntax are atrocious.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.147.241.181 (talk) 02:07, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is garbage! 

message: Unlike his fraternal twin brother, philosopher Brand Blanshard, Paul Blanshard was and remains one of the most polarizing figures in U.S. history. To coin a phrase: History is war. It is frequently a battleground, and necessarily so in a real-time, online, People's Encyclopedia. Prior versions of this biographical sketch had the pendulum swung into the zone of apoplectic vitriol, yet no calls for so-called Neutrality were forthcoming at the top of the article. The concept of neutrality has all but disappeared from journalism and expecting it here seems slightly Pollyanish. Sources, for example, are not neutral. Is the Catholic Encyclopedia neutral about Paul Blanshard? The best achievement of neutrality was displayed by Pope John XXIII, who invited him to attend Vatican II. 
In a printed encyclopedia, the biographical sketches of Brand and Paul would appear contiguous to each other, and each man would be better understood by readers who examined both articles.    
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.82.60.165 (talk) 15:24, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality and Paul Blanshard 

message: The entry states that Pope John XXIII invited Paul Blanshard to cover Vatican II. Not only is this unsourced, how plausible is it that the pope would invite someone, who at the time, was often described, and not just by Catholics, as an anti-Catholic bigot? Did Blanshard even make this claim himself?
Bronxpolwatcher (talk) 21:18, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Pope Invited Blanshard to Vatican II?
Talk:True north (geography)

message: Currently, in 2002, Polaris is at its closest approach to the celestial north pole. 2,000 years ago, the closest star to the celestial north pole was Thuban.
:What does "Currently, in 2002" in that sentence signify? Does it signify that the sentence was written in 2002 or, that so far, to this date (even still in 2006, as I type) 2002 was the closest approach? The sentence really is difficult to parse. -- Cimon avaro; on a pogostick. 12:42, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  I have a different nit to pick... 

message: how can the egyptians (and where is it documented) have been able to align the pyramids with true north by a margnial error of 3minutes, if there was no way of knowing what was north and south??  [[Great Pyramid of Giza]
--Brownarthur (talk) 11:33, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  egyptians and the true north
Talk:GMC Denali

message: I think this page should be merged with both the GMC Yukon page and the GMC Envoy page. There's simply nothing here that can't be explained on those aforementioned pages. --ApolloBoy 08:06, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes you can, the Denali is mentioned on the Chevy Tahoe page, I'd much rather see that remark on the Tahoe page expanded rather than the Denali having its own unnecessary page. --ApolloBoy 08:27, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger? 

message: Rather than discussing it in timeline form, why not organize it by model?  The sections would be model names instead of car names.  Bok269 15:56, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That is a good idea. I'll see when I get around to it- otherwise go ahead! Regards, Signaturebrendel 05:44, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Format 

message: The third line had this line:
"To clarify, Denali is in Alaska, not Yukon"
This seems very out of place. Does anyone agree? It doesn't even seem to be relevant information to the article.
I propose removing this line.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.26.183.200 (talk) 03:56, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  First Lines
Talk:Burnett Secondary School

message: The main page content style, was not entirely up to standard.  A few sentences were deleted to rectify that. Dgiraffes (talk) 06:33, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Honours of Scotland

message: I was told, years ago, that the circlet which forms the base of the crown, was the one that Robert the Bruce wore at Bannockburn. Is this nonsense?  --ML5 (talk) 11:40, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Robert I of Scotland|Robert]]'s circlet 

message: Stuart Kelly in his book 'Scott-land the Man Who Invented a Nation' p 160, reports that the whole 'discovery' episode was stage managed by Walter Scott. The idea that the regalia had actually been 'lost' was false. Their location in Edinburgh Castle was public knowledge, the chest had even been opened earlier, in 1794, and its contents checked. The chest was opened again the day before the 'offical' discovery in 1817 by Scott and associates in a kind of dress rehearsal for the 'real' discovery. Kelly implies that the whole thing was a kind of PR stunt for Scott's latest historical novel which was about the regalia and its supposed loss. Cassandra  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.12.104.103 (talk) 10:46, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The Crown Room was opened in 1794 by an official looking for old documents, but he didn't open the chest, which was rumoured to be empty. Scott obtained a royal warrant to open the chest in 1818. Officials wouldn't have let him break down the wall and open it without the king's authorisation. Firebrace (talk) 23:51, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discovery or PR Stunt? 

message: Re Avrea Sacri olei, etc., it is to be remarked that this is English Wikipedia, not Vicipaedia Latina, and users cannot be expected to construe Latin inscriptions without assistance. A translation ought to be forthcoming, surely?
Nuttyskin (talk) 21:53, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ampulla inscription
Category talk:Jewish chess players

message: Is this list appropriate for Wikipedia? -- Fplay 08:46, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: In the page on Jewish chess players you have ommitted the name of Robert (Bobby) Fischer - rather a major oversight, would you not say? Of course, he is in Wikipedia, but there is no link to this page. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 4.227.200.21 (talk) 20:44, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Name
Talk:Activity diagram

message: In UML 2.0, all flows into an activity must be active. So, this diagram would not get into the first activity. as the flow from the decision node is not active when the first activity is attempted to be entered.
Technically the diagram is valid, it just can't execute.
In UML 1.x, a flow can't be split without using the fork bar. This diagram has a fork caused by unlabeled split node. -- Mjchonoles 08:56, 30 December 2005.
The diagram at the top right should have open arrows rather than filled ones.  There is a bit of confusion due to some incorrect diagrams in the UML spec itself.  See Spec 1.5, page 2-180.  Compare ibid., pp. 3-155 to 3-168.  See also Spec 2.5, page 395, immediately following fig. 15.4, which states "An ActivityEdge...is notated by an open arrowhead line connecting two ActivityNodes."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robtrodes (talk • contribs) 16:53
I think you should create two diagrams modeling the same thing, one in UML 1.x and one in UML 2.x to illustrate the differences.
208.49.239.6 (talk) 13:54, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diagram is not valid UML 1.x nor UML 2.0 

message: How is this different from flowcharts, apart from forking and joining?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.243.133.165 (talk) 15:44, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That is indeed the most important difference. Rp (talk) 16:54, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Difference from Flowcharts 

message: The chart is missing an arrow head194.176.105.141 (talk) 12:32, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing arrow head
Talk:Catch My Disease

message: I just wanted to ask, if anyone knows... where was it number one? I don't think it was...
139.168.118.157 08:58, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  [untitled] 

message: I changed the live version info a bit. He doesn't just change the names of the bands in the third verse, he also changes the venue in the second verse, and then usually the drink to make it still rhyme.Demonofthefall 12:08, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Live versions
Talk:Elissa Steamer

message: The second link on this is broken. Maybe replace it with another updated link? Cici.d (talk) 07:36, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I removed the Notability template today, as it is not warranted. In July 2014, Steamer remains the most prominent and well-known female skateboarder in the history of professional skateboarding.--Soulparadox (talk) 06:06, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability template removal 
Talk:Down by the Bay

message: Just so you know,
If you attempt to read the lyrics in Leetspeak, you'll simulate reading it in its original form at 6 or so years old! Try it. See how hard it is? When you read a children's song in Leetspeak, you get a feel of how hard it was to read it in plain English back then. --Shultz 09:11, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Leetspeak

message: The song "Yialo, Yialo" is featured in a cafe scene in the Guns of Navarone.  When I first saw the movie this was the first song I thought of.  Worth mentioning the movie?150.203.110.103 (talk) 15:57, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guns of Navarone 

message: Why are the words fish and dish links in the Lyrics section? It seems like something that should be removed. Lothp (talk) 03:13, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fish and Dish 

message: the lyrics example list is longer than necessary. im going to read through them for meter and remove the ones that i feel *suck*. i would like to chop it by half. objections? ViniTheHat (talk) 02:10, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  lyrical pruning. 

message: Why and where does this article need additional citations for verification? What references does it need and how should they be added? Hyacinth (talk) 06:47, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional citations

message: I'm just researching the song and curious if Raffi's assertion is enough to definitively pin down the origin and date of the song. Is there any other evidence?
Submersible (talk) 22:26, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  song is from England circa 1914-1918?
Talk:Moonsault

message: The "Moonsault senton bomb", a backflip with a senton bomb end. --KingOfDX (talk) 09:38, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  And... 

message: I notice that the asai moonsault is described but there should probably also be mention of a springboard moonsault on an opponent inside the ring being known as a lionsault in the U.S., as that is what everyone in wrestling calls it. Even wrestling schools and the wrestlers themselves call it a lionsault.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.255.175.250 (talk) 07:01, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I suppose, isn't this named after Chris Jericho who associates with lions and who frequently performs it? It says here that moonsaults are frequently performed from the top rope, he normally does it from the middle rope, but by 'normally' I take it that we can also count presses done from the middle or bottom ropes too? Just so long as we're talking slams and not stuff like how John Morrison bounces off the rope to deliver kicks or something. Tyciol (talk) 16:30, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lionsault 

message: The word 'moonsault' is used in all these headers. While using the full name bolded in the section would be great, do you guys think it might be okay to omit the mention from the actual section titles itself? These aren't needed since 'moonsault' is inferred and simply 'double' or 'corkscrew' would suffice so people know what they're talking about. This would make directing people to the section easier since it's less to type out, and it allows stuff like redirecting Corkscrew moonsault to Moonsault#Corkscrew instead of Moonsault#Corkscrew moonsault which reads excessively. Tyciol (talk) 16:27, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Variations section naming

message: I don't have time do to the thinking but it may be worthwhile to add a section about Eiji Ezaki's career ending injury when performing a springboard moonsault. --Marc Kupper|talk 02:40, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eiji Ezaki injury 
Talk:Joint lock

message: Someone could add a section about how the usage of joint locks is perceived in courts as a form of self-defense, if anyone happens to know anything about this (I don't).---Marcus- 09:42, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Joint locks and self-defense

message: Should there be so many joint locking articles? There is a separate Chin Na article and there are individual articles for the following:
* Armlock 
* Compression lock 
* Grappling_hold 
* Leglock 
* Small_joint_manipulation 
* Spinal_lock 
* Wristlock 
The Chin Na article is obviously written from the Chinese martial arts perspective, but there are only so many ways to apply a joint lock - should there be separate articles? I ask the question as I am open to answers. Womble bee 14:25, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?
Talk:Space–time block code

message: I checked it against the original paper "Space–Time Block Codes from Orthogonal Designs." Matrix element (2,3) and (6,3) needs to be negated.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Csboyer (talk • contribs) 02:25, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect 3 antenna STBC 

message: The "Decoding" section in the "Space Time Block Code" section contains a mistake: 
"One particularly attractive feature of STBCs is that maximum likelihood decoding can be achieved at the receiver with only linear processing." 
The sentence is wrong because only ORTHOGONAL STBCs enjoy this feature. Quasi-orthogonal STBCs cannot use this advantage, and their loss in performance (as long as linear decoding is concerned) is also due to this. Therefore also in the Quasi-orthogonal STBCs section this point (ie: impossibility to perform ML detection with linear processing) should be pointed out.
147.162.2.222 09:58, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Decoding 

message: Why does the "Rate 1/2" code for 3 transmit antennas contain an S4? This doesn't make sense. It also appears to be a Rate 3/8 block code.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.207.237.68 (talk • contribs) 18:16, 20 November 2006
:Well, that's just the way that STBC works. It distributes 4 symbols over 3 antennas, and does not transmit them all in each time-slot. There is no particular reason why it should, after all. You can easily check that it is orthogonal (CC^*=I). So it takes 8 time-slots to transmit 4 symbols, and is a rate-1/2 STBC. (Also, check the cited paper, [6]). 137.222.189.198 16:05, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  3 transmit antennas 

message: Many say that Alamouti code has been adopted in various global standards such as:
* IEEE 802.11n
Can somebody list all the other possible standard?
S. Jo 10:27, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Related standards 

message: Can somebody provide an example of the diversity criterion? I find it pretty hard to understand and it doesn't have any citations at all in that section.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fcastillo (talk • contribs) 04:17, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diversity
Talk:Ngāpuhi

message: Removed from article: "They were thought to be named after the many (nga) feathered canoe decorations (puhi) which canoes that arrived into New Zealand dropped of in this area." There are several theories about the origin. Most concern either chiefly female virgins (puhi) or people whose names started with Puhi, not canoe decorations. Nurg 10:15, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Origin of name

message: I dont think that Ngati Hine should be given the title of an Iwi.This will damage the funds given to the northland tribes due to there being more than one Iwi with in the Peowhairangi region.This doesn't seem right.I have Ngati Hine in my blood but I still have to disagree with these claims that Ngati Hine is an Iwi.Ngati Hine should always and will always be a sub-tribe of Ngapuhi-Nui-tonu
*I moved the above to here as it seems more of a discussion than a central part of the article.   My impression was that Ngati Hine felt they could manage their own affairs more efficiently than Ngapuhi.  ping 07:24, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Ngati Hine

message: Is it correct to refer to Ngapuhi's "claim that sovereignty was not given up". Surely this claim is only made by a small minority of activists, and cannot be a mainstream, much less majority, view?124.197.15.138 (talk) 05:30, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sovereignty 

message: The 2013 census may have shown 125,601 people describing themselves as of Ngapuhi ancestry. That is not the same as the number "registered"- the census obviously does not register tribal affiliations, as such.Royalcourtier (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 22:32, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Numbers 

message: If arguably the most dominant woman athlete on the globe isn't notable I don't know who is.2602:306:33A6:14E0:EC3E:E5D7:782F:E280 (talk) 16:42, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Portia Woodman not Notable? 
Talk:Dan Murphy (musician)

message: I don't think this part is true:
  After losing the ability to play guitar in a car accident in 1998 and separating from his wife 
 (former Miss Oregon USA[1]) Jennifer in 1999, Murphy withdrew from public life and returned to
  Australia to pursue a career in photo journalism. He is currently studying media at The 
 University of Adelaide and is rumoured to have adopted a younger identity.
By the way, did this guy really start in the band Soul Asylum when he was 12? 
Rogerthat 10:24, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This bloke has got the American Murphy mixed up with an Australian Murphy. Rogerthat Talk 03:42, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled