Talk:Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull/Archive 1

message: *This article was listed for deletion on 16 April, 2005. The discussion was closed with the result of no consensus.  This article will not be deleted. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 20:16, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Closed deletion listing

message: Wasn't his name "Junior"?
:That's Dr. Henry Jones Jr. to you! :P The Wookieepedian 22:32, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indiana's real name 

message: My Disney Shareholder information (I received in the mail today) told of a Lucasfilm production being filmed (two scenes) at Disney-MGM Studios Florida from June 21 to July 10, 2006. It listed Harrison Ford as one of the actors in the film but did not specify the film's name. I think its obviously Indiana Jones 4.Gwag
:Interesting Pictureuploader 00:18, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe it's a Star Wars production set in The New Jedi Order era. The Wookieepedian 02:55, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: We wished! Pictureuploader 07:05, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Filming a scene at Disney-MGM Studios Florida 

message: Here's a good reason to make this film, and to make a few more!: Indy and his dad drank from the Holy Grail in the 3rd movie! They'll live forever! Ya can't get rid of 'em! You can't stop making movies! (Unless the actors die) :(
KdogDS 02:46, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Exactly, because only an idiot would of forgotten that.
You would need to drink constantly from the Grail anyway. Not just once.
SRodgers--65.24.77.104 00:42, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explanation for film 

message: Although the previous script was rejected the part that said "re-uniting Indy's girlfriends from all three previous films" cannot happen in the possible new script. In two of the films they did survive, but, in the 3rd film Alison Doodley's(?) character died in that crevasse. It was implied that Capshaw's character went back to wherever she lived because they don't "rip peoples hearts out" or something like that, although she can still return, but the 1st film took place after its sequel (Yes I said SEQUEL there is no such a word prequel, get over it, anyway) so, wouldn't that exclude Capshaw's character, leaving only Marion Ravenwood (Karen Allen) for possible return?
SRodgers--65.24.77.104 00:34, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well my Oxford Illustrated Dictionary is quite specific that there is such a word as prequel, so it would seem to be you who needs to get over it.  Binabik80 00:29, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible Problem 

message: The section about the movie coming out in 2006 needs to be changed, as it is now late July. Also: http://m-w.com/dictionary/prequel
It's in the dictionary.
It's a real word.
64.136.196.67 06:33, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "June 2006" 

message: I've inserted a Footnotes section so references can be shown in more detail.  I've also added numerous requests for citation on various items in the article, such as the "rumored" titles, the "rumored" casting, etc.  If there is no citation for these in the next few days, they will be removed.  I will try to help locate citations for some of the items, but I would like to remind people that sources should be valid and not be the word of scoopers.  One citation I don't like, by the scoopier "Napier", could be replaced by a more authentic source.  Something like The Hollywood Reporter is fine.  Fan-based speculation is not suitable for this encyclopedic entry and should be purged where necessary.  We can lock down this article if we have the drive. --Erik 14:55, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleaning up the article

message: I remember checking this page a while back for the rumored cast and they all had citations (Variety, Hollywood Reporter etc) and now they've gone *sigh* Kim Meyrick
:Due to the citation requests being removed by another user after being posted for over a week, I've decided to go ahead and remove the rumored cast.  Wikipedia is not a rumor mill, and so-called rumored cast can be added back in with the appropriate citation if the information comes from the actors/actresses, studio, director, or producers. --Erik 23:19, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations were removed

message: Here's a recent blurb from CNN ... don't know how to work this into the article.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/SHOWBIZ/Movies/10/20/people.harrisonford.ap/index.html
 Em-jay-es 20:32, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent CNN news clip 

message: Can we please change this? It's not summer everywhere when it's released. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.172.4.44 (talk • contribs) 05:14, October 26, 2006
:I'm not sure how we can change it to reflect a universal sense.  The thing is, summer 2008 probably refers to the film being released in North America, so it's accurate in that way.  It depends on when ID4 would be released in other parts of the world. --Erik (talk/contrib) @ 12:33, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Summer of 2008 

message: I'm confused, in the status section of this page, it says that Ford, Harrison, and Lucas all approved  Koepp's script, and are moving forward with that. Whereas in the story section it says that Nathanson's story is the one that's being currently used. So is the story and the script two different things, because I thought they were the same. If so then something's off, because they can't be using both scripts for the film, like the article implies. WIKI-GUY-16 17:18, 9 November(UTC)
Nathanson wrote, and Koepp polished, as I've now dug up. Wiki-newbie 18:44, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nathanson or Koepp?

message: I've removed my (unwanted) contributions. I've reverted back to Wiki-Newbie's version, as he appears to be the 'owner' of this page and anything relating to the Indiana Jones character.Mikejstevenson 14:43, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not a close watcher of this film article, but I removed what was visibly inappropriate -- the unencyclopedic rumors and the fans' parody titles.  This doesn't mean your other edits are invalid as a result.  Wiki-newbie isn't the owner of this page, but he's improved the article tremendously since the film has been greenlighted.  Since I'm not familiar with the rest of the article's content, I've asked him to review anything useful that you might have removed.  Please don't consider the removal of unencyclopedic information as a personal attack on you; there are policies all editors need to adhere to. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 14:54, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert