Talk:Suspended sentence

message: I'm not at all concinved that the description given is applicable to the situation in English law.  Here, I'm pretty sure I've heard the news media report things like "He was sentenced to a six month prison term suspended for two years" and I'd always understood that it was carrying out the sentence that was suspended, rather than the sentencing that was suspended.
Also not at all sure about the link between suspended sentences and probation...
Roy Badami 10:37, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Bit late to be responding but no, it's the sentencing which is suspended in UK law also. In that example after 2 years they don't go off an serve 6 months, if the reoffend within 2 years the 6 month sentence becomes enacted (as well as anything due for the subsequent offences) --81.104.39.63 (talk) 18:53, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  In that case the article is unclear. I read it as saying only sentencing was delayed, ie. the sentence still had to be declared and then carried out at the end of the term of suspension, not that the sentence would only be enacted if another crime was commited within the period of suspension. 92.237.4.111 (talk) 14:53, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

text: This appears to be about styles of policing, and not specifically about suspended sentences. --Snigbrook (talk) 11:29, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  US centric? 

message: I believe this article is confusing a suspended sentence with a deferred sentence. In Vermont, deferred sentencing allows the judge to suspend passing of the sentence. A suspended sentence, on the other hand, has been passed but the execution of the sentence is suspended while the offender is on probation. G. Csikos, 8 December 2009.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.245.238.133 (talk) 06:05, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suspended versus deferred sentence 

message: I suggest that the term "suspended" should be defined.  One can probably guess that a suspended sentence is a sentence which has been suspended, but the meaning of suspension should be made explicit. 129.31.242.90 (talk) 20:00, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Keeping me in suspense 

message: As a European citizen, I don't have much information about the US-law and can't really define the difference between "Suspended sentence" and "Probation." It would be great to find a short information about it.
Thank you, --R0T421 (talk) 15:41, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Difference to Probation 

message: Is this true? I read this a while ago and it appears to contradict the statement, could someone please verify.
----
Case study: Tran, Ng & Le
Tran and Ng were students at the University of Technology, Sydney, who developed a free music download site using MP3 technology. Le subsequently assisted in making copyrighted material available on the site. The site was said to have received some seven million hits. The matter was first investigated by MIPI and a brief was handed to the AFP before charges were prosecuted by the DPP in the Central Local Court in Sydney in December 2003. As no money or trade was involved, the charges were brought under s 132(2)(b) for knowingly distributing copyrighted work, to an extent that affects prejudicially the owner of copyright, for a purpose other than trade. Ng and Le were sentenced to perform 200 hours community service. Tran was assessed as unsuitable for a community service order and was fined $5000. Tran and Ng each faced an additional charge reflecting their longer-term involvement and were convicted and received prison sentences of 18 months, suspended for three years.
An application on behalf of MIPI to be represented in the hearing was refused. MIPI advocated a full-time custodial penalty. It also sought an order for costs, which the DPP declined to put to the court. MIPI had estimated the loss caused to copyright holders by the defendants to be in the vicinity of $200 million, whereas the AFP gave an estimated loss of $60 million. On this point, the court found that the loss suffered was 'substantial' but could not be quantified with precision.
http://www.aic.gov.au/publications/current%20series/htcb/1-20/htcb003.html
----
121.209.51.191 (talk) 11:45, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Australia - Suspended period cannot exceed original sentence. 

message: I believe that the Commonwealth law concept of Discharge (sentence) should be merged with this topic since the legal concepts appear to be analogous.
Divercth (talk) 16:53, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I see there has been no discussion of this. I also disagree with it - a suspended sentence is still a sentence, it is just one which is not enacted. A discharge does not constitute a conviction and therefore is substantially different.  --Super Nintendo Chalmers (talk) 14:46, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger Proposal 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Suspended sentence. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20140204022539/http://www.premier.vic.gov.au/media-centre/media-releases/7964-next-stage-of-suspended-sentences-abolition-begins-today.html to http://www.premier.vic.gov.au/media-centre/media-releases/7964-next-stage-of-suspended-sentences-abolition-begins-today.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:19, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified