lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Glenfield Mall

message: As is being discussed at the talk page of WP:LOCAL, there are concerns that there shouldn't be articles about individual shopping malls unless there is something extraordinary about them, which has been covered in non-local press.  Is there anything about this particular mall which meets that standard?  If not, I recommend that this information be merged into the article about the parent community. --Elonka 20:24, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There are concerns, but until there is consensus, you don't get to go about the encyclopedia trying to enforce your views on others against their will. If you want to get rid of this perfectly notable article, do it through the proper processes. Rebecca 09:35, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  The  tag seems like a much gentler way of addressing an article, than submitting it for deletion.  The tag I placed said effectively that the article should have additional references added, or be considered for a merge. Why do you think I'm trying to "get rid" of it? --Elonka 11:07, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Myriads of articles on Wikipedia need references, and there is no reason or justification for applying a much higher standard of referencing to shopping centres because killing them it is your particular fetish at the moment, as this distracts effort from places where it is genuinely needed, such as biographies of living persons. I also object to merging this article in any circumstances (merging counts as getting rid of it in my book, since its content would not fit in any other article). Rebecca 12:09, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I see no reason to let a bad article stay on Wikipedia simply because there are other bad articles in existence, or because other areas need work.  If an article doesn't have any claim of notability, and doesn't have any solid references, it should go. --Elonka 19:49, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  The article does have a claim to notability - it is a large shopping centre of importance to many people. It is, as such, in the same basket as any other article without references - there is, at present, no policy or guideline allowing their deletion on that basis. Rebecca 00:03, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Oppose deletion as per Elonka's comments. MadMaxDog 06:53, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability concerns
Talk:Cape Elizabeth Light

message: Added Pictures, keep up the good work guys! --Dk69 04:49, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Pictures Added

message: I removed the information about the intensity of the light:
:"The light uses a second-order Fresnel lens, and projects a beacon with an intensity of 4 megacandelas. This is currently the most intense light of its kind in New England."
as (a) I couldn't verify it and (b) it cites the prior second order fresnel lens, which is no longer in use, see http://www.uscg.mil/history/docs/CG_Classical_Lens_in_Operation.pdf    Jameslwoodward (talk) 01:29, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Light Details
Talk:Hayati (album)

message: *hayati is also the name of a species from the fictional series Animorphs Nicoleta (talk) 02:37, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: need disambiguation page
Talk:Fort Gorges

message: I'm curious why there's no citation on the "Widely considered unsafe to visit" I don't believe that is supportable.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.45.180.203 (talk) 19:23, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 16:51, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008
Talk:MC Tee

message: If anyone knows what happened to/where MC Tee is currently, please contribute to this page! There was a reference to Mantronik getting back with MC Tee on the http://www.cheebadesign.com (Fan site) website, but it doesn't appear that anything came of it (that I can tell). Sundevilesq 20:36, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current whereabouts? 

message: imdb.com reports that Emden was born in Haiti.  That fact needs to be included in this article.  Please do not remove unless you post another reference/source that shows otherwise.  We can incorporate that in if we need to. Sundevilesq 16:57, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hatian born 

message: Accusations of sexual offenses should be backed up with (credible) sources.195.241.246.130 (talk) 15:11, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sex offender status 
Talk:Neil Campbell (musician)

message: Wot no discography? Or is finding out all those obscurities too daunting? Totnesmartin 20:40, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: ...and only two done. Still, the discog is up. Totnesmartin 16:21, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

message: Neil does not appear on the following:
Zene/Salivating Regina 7" (this was Simon Wickham-Smith and some US guys)
Alarms - C46 cassette (this was me and a couple of other people, but no Neil)
Live In Greece 1992 - cassette (this was Jim Plaistow, Sharen Woodward, and a woman they met in Greece)
It should also be noted that we like leaving mistakes in, A Band history is supposed to be vague
(there was one gig that I can't even remember what year it happened in or what it was called, for example)
Also, is there to be no inclusion of the ASC CDR series?  
Stewart Keith  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.9.52.55 (talk) 19:09, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: A Band discog

message: Hows about adding Neil Campbell/ Sticky Foster 8" lathe cut (for Sticky FOster's vanity box)
Details below from http://www.altvinyl.com/details.asp?rId=19434 
*artist    	 neil campbell & sticky foster
*title   	live at RRRecords / long distance moan
*format   	8"
*record label   	alt.vinyl
*release year   	2006
*catalogue number   	av003
*featuring john olson (wolf eyes) as MC on side 1. Pressed on ultra ltd (150) 8" clear square uncut lathes...a beauty. The third release on our own alt.vinyl label..
¬¬¬¬ Sticky Foster —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 41.209.100.114 (talk) 22:25, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Totnesmartin 23:19, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:   neil campbell & sticky foster: live at RRRecords / long distance moan 8"  

message: There are now 120 items in the discography, and there is probably more stuff out there. Should we include everything, and if not, where should we draw the line? Totnesmartin (talk) 16:47, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That's probably a good idea. Actually, it's definitely a good idea! Totnesmartin (talk) 22:22, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discography 

message: My late brother was Vince please get in touch. I was trained as a classical musician .
Angela 2A00:23C8:5218:F201:E18F:2E1:AD4C:9E33 (talk) 20:55, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vincent earimal
Talk:Stereogum

message: this article needs to be cleaned up!
Wasn't the site bought by Buzznet?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.56.64.138 (talk) 13:40, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This list:
* Infuential Music Executives from Condé Nast Portfolio, September 2007
* Bands' Net Gains from New York Daily News, August 2007
* Music Web Sites Sponsor Concerts, Albums from Associated Press, July 2007
* The Insider: Scott Lapatine from The Austin Chronicle, March 2007
* Moguls Of New Media Power List from the Wall Street Journal, August 2006
* "The Dean of music blogs." - TMZ, July 2006
* #7 Best Music Website - Entertainment Weekly, May 2006
* Music: The Rise of the 'Yupster' - Newsweek, January 2006
* Best Of The Web - Forbes, 2005
* Readers Poll Winner: Best Blog - Spin Magazine, 2005
is basically a bunch of dead links and publicity spam.  A list of every time the subject gets mentioned in the media may be of interest to their public relations department, but it is not encyclopedic.  WhatamIdoing (talk) 23:03, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rm publicity spam
Talk:Double helix

message: The structure and content of the article was completely revised. Almost all of the changes I made are accompanied by scientific references. 
--Naturespace (talk) 23:58, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: May 2008

message: The late philosopher George W. Roberts, then of Duke University, with his colleague the mathematician Bill Pohl, published a paper in the Journal of Mathematical Biology "Topological consideration in the theory of replication of DNA" (Vol 6, No 4; Oct 78; pps 383-402; Springer Verlag) with the thesis that DNA forms a "Twin Helix" instead of a "Double Helix". The two strands of a Twin Helix are not topologically connected; imagine two slinkies, side by side, and slid together. The strands of a Double Helix are connected; imagine two straight wires side by side, then twisted together from the ends. They can not be slid apart without being first unravelled.
The arguement is that the Twin Helix would be thermodynamically feasible for enzymes to seperate. At the time, X-Ray Crystalography was not sufficiently advanced to indicate the precise topology directly. One can hope that by now the issue has been resolved by someone.
 
The Twin Helix hypothesis may seem simplest and therefore likliest, but it was not accepted by the molecular biology community at the time.
Peter H. St.John, M.S. 20:41, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes

message: That the guy who came up with the idea of the double helix was at the time under the influence of LSD. Any truth to this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Craigboy (talk • contribs) 02:21, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No.--HoneymaneHeghlu meH QaQ jajvam 04:08, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  See Snopes for more information, it seems the answer is more complicated. 87.66.103.114 (talk) 12:44, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rumor I heard on late night VH1 programming 

message: I changed 'based on work by Rosalind Franklin' to 'stolen from...' as it is fact that Maurice Wilkins saw Rosalind Franklin's work which showed the double helical structure and told Crick and Watson her findings, aggravated by her patience and thoroughness. Feel free to debate this, but I feel this is historically accurate. -Rich  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.100.4.112 (talk) 17:27, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: My alteration

message: I have reworded the text dealing with Rosalind Franklin. That she died before they were awarded and that they are not awarded posthumously are both facts. Whether she would have got one had she lived is more pov. There are reliable sources that say her work deserved one, but only three are awarded in each subject each year. Her death means that we will never know whether the third award would have gone to her or Wilkins. Rjm at sleepers (talk) 20:18, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rosalind Franklin and the Nobel Prize
Talk:Tiny Toon Adventures: How I Spent My Vacation

message: Should the article mention that a broadcast premier featured a radically edited version of this film?  Reviewing my archives, I taped the primetime premier of "how I spent my vactation" that had most musical numbers and the buster and babs subplot removed; I think to fit in a one hour time slot.--Kencaesi (talk) 19:19, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: What would be your reference? Youself? That wouldn't fly - plus, the information about the actual original broadcast airing (as four separate episodes) is already in the article. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 20:18, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  information of alternate edit of film 

message: I've got two sources, one saying the film was unrated and one saying it was rated G.  Does anyone who has a copy of the movie know if the box has a rating on it? Gak Blimby (talk) 03:45, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rating 

message: I am considering nominating this article to Featured Article candidacy. If anyone has any concerns about the quality of the article, please write it down here so I or others may address it.  If there are no concerns raised, I will nominate the article.
Gak Blimby (talk) 18:35, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I am nominating the article Gak Blimby (talk) 21:10, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomination to FA status 
Talk:Cartel des Gauches

message: i actually have no knowledge of french political history but have done some editing on this page simply because it needed it badly. if anyone does know about this subject please help spiff up this article.  because of my lack of knowledge in the area the following part was not edited but badly need fixing "The following day, the radical-socialist president of the council Edouard Daladier had to resign before the pression of the street". i'm not sure what the original writers intent was but it has been lost in translation. --Tainter 20:42, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Predictive medicine

message: Article created as a basis for providing information about predicitve medicine (needs more info). Pvosta 20:45, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: what about predicting whatwill happen in the person's entire lifetime using genes?
do this deny genetic memory?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.246.14.122 (talk) 19:50, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  now what about predicting what will happen next using gene
Talk:Central Dauphin East High School

message: --71.240.154.206 20:26, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Independent secondary sources are needed to include information like this in articles. --DThomsen8 (talk) 15:11, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversy
Talk:UCD Quinn School of Business

message: Who on earth wrote this page? Almost every piece of info given was wrong! I fixed most of the errors, but the official name of the school is The UCD Quinn School of Business, but I don't know how to change the title.
I agree -- the article was horrific, now it's just uninteresting. There is no record in the entire Internet of any wealthy businessman named Loughlan (most likely misspelled for Loughlin) Quinn, although there is an Irish Government Minister with a similar name.
216.194.3.94 20:15, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Amazing-Man (Centaur Publications)

message: Does anyone know if this character is still in the public domain? It was my understanding that once a character like this fell into public domain, that's where it stayed but an acquaintance who is doing some inking on Marvel's new "Iron Fist: Immortal Weapons" stories said he is pretty certain Marvel now owns John Aman. Can anyone clarify whether the character is still public domain? I think the information would be important to the article. 64.222.94.132 (talk) 13:33, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess no-one knows. I would think that as you say, the original character is public domain and always will be. Anything that Marvel (or anyone else) later added I would think is copyright though. -- Beardo (talk) 23:25, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Still Public Domain?
Talk:The Grease Megamix

message: Year of release According to the Guinness Book Of Hit Singles, the Grease Megamix was released in December 1990. Is the article referring to a different mix released in 1998, or is it a reissue of the 1990 track? Knaw 20:53, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

message: According to an edit made in April 2008, the article states: "The DJ that created this was Joe Masciantonio from Outstanding Bass Productions for Philadelphia radio station Q102. It aired during a show called the 12 Noon Workout."
This info is wrong. "The Grease Megamix" was done by Phil Harding and Ian Curnow of PWL Productions. This is clearly stated in Phil Harding's book "PWL - From The Factory Floor" and Phil Harding has confirmed this to me personally. They also did "The Grease Dream Mix" in 1991.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.186.244.118 (talk) 13:30, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong info
Talk:Count Basie Center for the Arts

message: Having a list of all the musical acts and comedians who've played the Count Basie is silly.  It would be a very long list, it would never be accurate, and it wouldn't tell you anything meaningful.  Better to just mention a few artists who've established some kind of special relationship with the theatre and leave it like that.  Look at Radio City Music Hall, Beacon Theater, State Theatre, New Brunswick ... none of these articles try to list every act that's played in those places.   Wasted Time R 21:06, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: List

message: . . . specifically, [by whom?] and [specify], seem to come almost verbatim from . I'm coming into this article with very little background, and was mainly here to cite a quote, but it, and a fair bit of the article, is from there. Arcendet (talk) 17:15, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The statements with wiki-tags . . . 
Talk:Flying a fixed-wing aircraft without control surfaces

message: This is a fascinating article, but at present it reads slightly like a "how to" guide, which wikipedia is not. Also, the current title is fairly cumbersome. I wonder if this can be tidied up a bit. Very interesting all the same! -- FP (talk)(edits) 11:39, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That is why it has been proposed to be merged with Flight controls. --Pilotboi / talk / contribs 05:08, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

text: Template goes on the article space. I've moved it. Chris Cunningham 14:41, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "How to" guide?
Talk:Later (talk show)

message: Currently the article lumps all forms of Later together.  Should the article be split in three, such that each permutation has its own article?  At a minimum, such a move would make doing the infobox easier, because the shows had totally different staff.  Also, imdb thinks of them as separate shows (well, at least differentiates between the Costas show and the other two), such that you'd really need multiple imdb entries in the same infobox.  Could get confusing if anyone does a serious expansion of the article.  CzechOut 07:30, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split necessary? 

message: I distinctly remember during the final weeks of the Post-Costas/Pre-Kinnear era (when they continued to use Costas' set), that David Allen Grier had a similarly strained interview with Christopher Guest. It may be noteworthy as another milestone of surprising episodes. --69.124.112.126 (talk) 05:56, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Acrimonious interviews other than ''Snyder vs. Stern''
Talk:USS Honolulu (SSN-718)

message: If the Honolulu is newer built than the crah damaged San Francisco, why is it being decomissioned and cut up for SF repairs cannibalization? Logically they should keep the undamaged hawaiian running instead. Makes no sense to me. 82.131.210.162 10:00, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The San Francisco was newly refueled before it hit the wall. The Honolulu was still running on the fumes of the initial reactor load out from when she was first built.  Cutting the bow off the Honolulu and putting it on the San Francisco was cheaper than cutting the reactor out of the San Francisco and putting it in the Honolulu.  Putting a new bow on a ship is something the Navy has entirely too much practice with but changing out reactor plants like that would have been an entirely new endeavor and therefore risky.  ThomasH1966 (talk) 19:38, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The Navy has (or had) zero experience at replacing the entire bow (and all the included systems) of a submarine.  According to a friend who worked the project at PSNS, they were literally writing the book as they went along. 2601:600:C87F:C9E6:A970:1CE:8999:1AEC (talk) 18:08, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Braindead? 

message: According to the Naval Vessel Register  there is no decommission date. I've marked for citations where needed. Especially the dubious being cut up for parts. --Brad (talk) 03:11, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Status? 

message: This is the wrong ship’s crest. It was the original design but not the one used for the life of the ship 107.127.14.24 (talk) 23:34, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have a source that confirms that and shows the correct one? - wolf 03:36, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: history.navy.mil 2600:6C55:6800:1738:B586:CE7:14F2:FC7D (talk) 16:54, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a website. Do you have link to a specific webpage? - wolf 17:55, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ship’s Crest
Talk:Roman siege engines

message: I am wondering how you would be able to build a modern day scorpio
:Almost certainly possible, but this is probably not the right place for discussing it! LegesRomanorum (talk) 09:34, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  How to Build a Scorpio 

message: The "Legionaries" line doesn't seem to make any sense . Is this the case or am I just crazy ? ToxicReap (talk) 19:04, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammar In the Scorpion Subsection 

message: Hi everyone - I was reading through this article and liked what was covered and organized. The types of engines covered cover a lot of the basic technologies. It would be nice to see more references to them used in battle or in specific texts but other than that great. I was wondering though if a Roman Corvus could be considered a type of siege engines? I know it is used mostly in maritime warfare but it was designed to break through and provide passaged through the defensive structures on a ship's deck that sometimes included wall like fortifications. I totally get that this is a minor aspect compared to the others mentioned on this page but wanted to know your opinion on the matter. Thanks No1Knows (talk) 03:41, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible things to add? 

message: This article mentioned ballistas firing rocks of up to 78kg, would that be even physically possible considering that you can only store so much energy in sinew/rope? This is not counting the absurd size the machine would need to be.2001:569:7019:0:F1B0:A305:8A07:9FBE (talk) 16:28, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Giant ballistas even physically possible?
Talk:Whatever U Want

message: The infobox on this page has now been changed to the new standard detailed in WikiProject Songs.  Please do not revert to the old style infobox.  Alex valavanis 00:51, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox Conversion
Talk:Driver License Agreement

message: Nut cases and conspiracy nuts who write Wikipedia articles  ????? Thelude 21:17, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: INTERSTATE compact (YOU GUYS LEFT OUT "INTERSTATE COMPACT WITH LINK TO WIKIPEDIA ARTICLE ON THIS SUBJECT.  I ASSUME IT IS A "INTERSTATE COMPACT".  IS IT?)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.244.63.133 (talk) 06:19, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: INTERSTATE compact (YOU GUYS LEFT OUT "INTERSTATE COMPACT WITH LINK TO WIKIPEDIA ARTICLE ON THIS SUBJECT.  I ASSUME IT IS A "INTERSTATE COMPACT".  IS IT?)
Talk:Ethal

message: I've expanded this article with as much information as I can find about this character. However, as this article is still so short, I'm unsure about taking off the stub tag. Arbadihist 21:17, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is Sid Uamuin Ethal's wife? my copy of the Aislinge Oenguso says, in reference to Caer: "Cáer Ibormeith daughter of Ethal Anbúail from Síd Uamuin in the province of Connachta." Does this mean that Sid Uamuin is her mother or that Sid Uamuin is the name of the particular place in Connacht from which her father hails? After all, Bodb the Red's palace is called Sid ar Femuin. Can anyone clarify this? thanks Fergus mac Róich 16:31, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sid Uamuin
Talk:Lincoln-Herndon Law Offices State Historic Site

message: This article has received some potentially interesting information about Seth E. Tinsley recently, which may be better suited to an independent article about pioneer entrepreneur Tinsley. Bigturtle 21:22, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The site http://www.state.il.us/hpa/hs/Herndon.htm no longer links to anything. Google gave me http://www.illinois.gov/ as the State of Illinois website. I have changed this. Calineed 20:57, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  State of Illinois website