lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Climax, Minnesota

message: Here is a link to a USA Today article about the superintendent and the ban.  I am not sure how the formatting should work, so I did not add it myself. http://www.usatoday.com/news/offbeat/2004-02-13-town-shirts_x.htm 207.67.73.40 (talk) 16:44, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

message: In this edit, I reverted the collective effect of three edits changing the founding date. I made the revert during a WP:Huggle session after briefly having seen only the third of the three edits and seeing that it apparently mangled the footnoted cite by removing the closing  tag. Huggle reverted the series of three edits, not just the final edit.
The reverted editor questioned this on my talk page, and I took a closer look at this. I see
*Before the reverted edits were made, this older version of the article said that the town had been founded in 1896, and was named after a chewing tobacco company.Cited as a supporting source was 
*After the reverted edits but before the revert (disregardng the missing  tag), the article would have said that the town had been founded June 10, 1871 by Ole & Ingrid Estenson and was named after a chewing tobacco company. This PDF of a page from this 1976 edition of Pioneers of the Valley, a publication of the Polk County Historical Society, was cited in support.
I suggest that regular editors of this article come to a consensus here about what the article ought to say and what source or sources ought to be cited in support, considering WP:DUE. Wtmitchell  (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 03:59, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Founding date 

message: What, no mention of the famous Fertile woman? Sca (talk) 15:10, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Ha
Talk:Eastern Iranian languages

message: :As opposed to the Middle Western Iranian dialects, Middle Eastern Iranian preserves word-final syllables.
What does this mean?  Did the Western languages drop many entire word-final syllables from the parent language(s), which were maintained by the Eastern?  Or is it supposed to say "vowels" or "consonants" instead of "syllables"?  Otherwise the sentence makes no sense, since all words have to "end with syllables." — ˈzɪzɨvə (talk) 00:50, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Word-final syllables" 

message: This article was based on Ethnologue, which in turn follows Linguist List. These organizations undertake to maintain a current classification of the world's languages (whichever ones they can reach). Linguist List assigns an ISO code, which Ethnologue adopts. WP likes Linguist List, perhaps because it too likes to be culturally up-to-date. Being up-to-date, however, means frequently changing. Since this article and all the other related articles were created and abandoned by their editors Linguist List has done a double-take and has reclassified the Eastern Iranian languages as well as making a few other changes. So, our articles are not up-to-date. I suppose the original editors are still in shock about it. No one is working on these articles. We do have to be brought up to date and most of them needed clean-up anyway. I am doing some work in this area, very slowly. But, that is what generally is mainly wrong with them, apart from the usual reference and book citation clean-up required, and the over-condensation introducing ambiguity. That's what they need.Dave (talk) 12:22, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Ethnologue double-take

message: I've nominated the two categories for Northeastern and Southeastern Iranian up for deletion: Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 December 30#Northeastern and Southeastern Iranian. – Uanfala (talk) 15:09, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Northeastern and Southeastern Iranian categories up for deletion
Talk:Earl McRae

message: This needs to be written in a more encyclopedic tone, and to cite some sources. Sources shouldn't be hard to find. DES (talk) 05:43, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Reference # 1 to the Ottawa Sun (the only reference, at this time) is broken. 76.10.169.132 (talk) 21:48, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken link
Talk:The Sweep

message: Unless there are any real objections, I'd like to clear this page and have it redirect to 2007 NBA Finals. The Sweep is barely a week old, which hasn't given it enough time to enter neologism territory. And this doesn't seem like a case of the curse -- a highly overmatched team got beat. Cleveland curse games don't include every playoff loss. The article itself is nothing more than a summary of the games that's already found in the Finals page; any other commentary would be unverified and original research. Please let me know what you think. SliceNYC (Talk) 21:06, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If the article remains unsourced, I'd rather see it nominated for deletion. Redirecting it would lend credibility to the neologism. I'll put a prod tag on the article now. - EurekaLott 15:08, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good idea. SliceNYC (Talk) 00:53, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect? 

message: *The Curse of Cleveland
*Spurs Take 3-0 Lead Over Cavs
*With Sweep of Cavaliers, Spurs Are Champions Again - this archived New York Time article requires payment but appears to use "The Sweep" when I saw the result of a Google News Search.
However "The Sweep" doesn't need a full article and could be used within the Cleveland Sports Curse subsection.  This article as-is is redundant as there's the 2007 Finals article.--CRiyl 00:52, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Can't we redirect this already to 2007 NBA Finals? The Shot was certainly more notable than this, since it's replayed over and over again after all these years. --Howard the Duck 04:18, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources?
Talk:Ella Cruz

message: For others interested, this is about this image removal, where Davey writes: (Rm image - character images should be on the chaarcter articles only). I don't think that's true. For example, look at John Wayne where not just the first, but nearly every single photo, is of John Wayne "in character". The point of a photo is to tell the user what the article subject looks like. This photo does that. I mean, I might be able to see the argument that if Cruz were heavily made up in character that it doesn't really tell the user what she looks like, if we had a better one, but in this case, (a) we don't have any other image, so this one is clearly better than nothing, and (b) in it, she just looks like herself. In fact, I'm not so sure she is "in character" - she is being interviewed about her role in the movie, it's not an excerpt from the movie, I'm not at all sure that is her costume in the movie, it's just a hooded sweatshirt, are you sure that isn't just something she threw on between scenes? I haven't seen the film, have you? --GRuban (talk) 19:54, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: - I've self reverted ? .... Character images uploaded to WP can't actually be put in any article except the character however I wasn't aware that this A) was taken from YT and B) uploaded to Commons hence why I reverted, Regardless of whether the face is shown or their whole body It still should only be on that article however all that doesn't apply here, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 20:00, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing "in character" image? 

message: Hello, my fix on the page was removed, it was the "and is", it was supposed to fix a issue that might conflict with the left side of ref. [3] that only uses a comma? official_frar (talk) 12:35, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why my fix in the page is removed?
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Victor Cass

message: I recommend that the article on "Victor Cass" be maintained. Although Mr. Cass is best known locally and regionally, he is in a category--"Mexican American writers"--that is far from overflowing with information. Most likely any Hispanic author in our American society today is better known regionally than nationally or internationally. Such authors are extremely under-represented in the media, in schools, in bookstores, etc., despite their American heritage, as is the case with Mr. Cass. A review of Wikepedia articles on the Hispanic authors listed in this category underscores the dearth of information on and exposure of such folks. Mr. Cass is not on the scale of Sandra Cisneros' fame...yet. But he has received more publicity than the Google search revealed. Wikepedia has the opportunity with Victor Cass' case to do something unique in our information society today: to provide knowledge on an important but emerging and developing group of people--MEXICAN-AMERICAN WRITERS--who might not otherwise have any stage on which to make themselves known. Instead of deleting writers like Victor Cass, Wikipedia should be making the effort to provide needed information on every other Mexican-American writer listed in his category. Be a pioneer, Wikepedia! Thelma Reyna 06:08, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is not Wikipedia's job to be a social pioneer.  It is to be an encyclopedia, and as such is not a publisher of first instance; I recommend a view of WP:NOT.  As such, it is not only dreadfully arbitrary but outright racist to promote articles on random non-notable authors just because of the color of their skin.  The best way to save this article is to provide evidence of the publicity you claim which satisfies the requirements of WP:RS and WP:BIO.  Failing that, if Mr. Cass has the notability you believe he has, that will eventually come out in the whole rest of cyberspace.  It just won't be on Wikipedia before that time.    Ravenswing  12:47, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Dracula – Entre l'amour et la mort

message: I noticed there are some issues with this article;
Some of the English doesn't make sense, je suis bilingue alors si quelqu'un aimerais une traduction.
ex: " The musical ran Quebec province,"  Please let me know what you meant to say.
I interpret it as meaning "The musical was performed in the province of Quebec, Canada."
Big Dan 02:42, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor corrections 
Talk:Al Gallodoro

message: Where this article says that Gallodoro's father taught him clarinet using the "Albert method", as a clarinetist myself I'm fairly certain that this must mean the "Albert system", an old key/fingering arrangement for the clarinet which was still around in the first half of the 20th century but isn't commonly used in the U.S. any more, except by some Klezmer players. See Albert system. However, since I don't have any evidence to back up this reading, I'll just leave this comment. DSatz (talk) 13:44, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Albert system clarinet
Talk:Cardisoma

message: This news is a bit old, but this information could be useful for layman editors like me: two species that were once in Cardisoma no longer are as of 2016. C. rotunda and C. hirtipes are now in a new genus called Tuerkayana. Other members of the genus include T. celeste and T. magnum (formerly Discoplax).
Source: https://bioone.org/journals/Zoosystema/volume-40/issue-sp1/zoosystema2018v40a26/Review-of-grapsoid-families-for-the-establishment-of-a-new/10.5252/zoosystema2018v40a26.short
TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 02:34, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Tuerkayana
Talk:Juno (film)

message: In the Reception section, replace X  with Y 
But I would rather have this account be out there than  silence being misinterpreted". 
ie use the  template so that it is clear to editors that the formatting and punctuation was quoted directly from the original source, (without bothering ordinary readers with side commentary they do not need to care about). -- 109.79.161.90 (talk) 18:02, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: User:CanonNi (talk|contribs) 01:45, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 11 April 2024
Talk:Monthly Playboy

message: Why is this article named 'Monthly Playboy'? At least the issue in the article has the text PLAYBOY in capitals.
And then some smaller text (probably month & year, maybe price also), but only about 1/10 in size. It is not even readable as the picture is so small. 82.141.95.39 (talk) 02:16, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Okay, so I found out there once was MONTHLY Playboy, which is directly connected to the US Playboy - ceased publication a few years ago. But there is also WEEKLY PLAYBOY which still exists but is not connected to the US Playboy. Weekly Playboy explains this, but this page does not, so it should be at least added with a redirect or something? --VArakawa (talk) 14:33, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weekly/ Monthly Playboy and confusion
Talk:James Morrison (fiddler)

message: Can counter rev please explain why (apart from the obvious) he considers one of the most famous fiddlers of all time to have questionable notability!--Vintagekits 21:49, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, right, is he?  Sorry.  I just saw there was only two sources and they didn't seem that notable at that.  If he genuinely is please feel free to remove the notability tag. --Counter-revolutionary 21:57, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: So thats your criteria for adding notability tags then is it? I'll remember that! You added it so you remove it.--Vintagekits 22:02, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I bet you will but all articles are judged on their merits...I would've thought the most famous fiddler "of all time" would have more than two (fairly trivial) sources. I'll remember your above comments should the notability of a number of articles be questioned by you.  There's no need for a quid pro quo operation. --Counter-revolutionary 22:17, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Your right, the article isnt near finished but the info on this website should provide you with plenty of information to flesh out the article. regards--Vintagekits 22:38, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Asti wine

message: Why does this say "formerly known as Asti Spumante" when a quick Google search is enough to assure the reader that it is currently known by the full name and no other, except perhaps in slang? 64.60.100.162 (talk) 10:49, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heading? 

message: OK, so we know where this wine comes from. But what is it like? The taste, aftertaste, aroma, etc? How does it compare with other similar wines? Etc, etc. Cema (talk) 08:42, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Describe wine
Talk:PBMR

message: This was a two-way disambiguation, but only one of its branches was a Wikipedia article, the other was an external link. If an article or stub is written on the company, then the disambig could be restored... but IMO the company is only notable for this one project, so the content would probably be better added to the pebble bed modular reactor article. Andrewa 07:09, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Not a disambiguation page
Talk:Favorskii rearrangement

message: I am just editing the German article on the :de:Faworski-Reaktion and am somewhat surprised that here Favorskii reaction and Favorskii rearrangement are given as synonymes for what is the German :de:Faworski-Umlagerung. Why is the reaction involving an alkyne and a carbonyl moiety omitted in the English Wikipedia, while it is well present in English chemical literature? --Dr. Dscho 07:13, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Favorskii reaction
Talk:Wooden Heart

message: An infobox was requested for the 1961 Joe Dowell recording at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Missing_encyclopedic_articles/List_of_notable_songs/14. — Preceding unsigned comment added by InnocuousPseudonym (talk • contribs) 21:02, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What's up with the genre labeling of this song as "Blues" ? This is a folk song, or, at best, a pop version of a folk song. It's not blues at all.Ugo1970 (talk) 14:56, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have a reference for that? As far as I know, the words belong to "Fred Wise, Ben Weisman, Kay Twomey and German bandleader Bert Kaempfert." Plasmic Physics (talk) 21:22, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre: Blues?
Talk:Comp Ace

message: I want to add this site in Ex links.
http://83
1rec.blog99.fc2.com/blog-entry-39.html  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.221.248.237 (talk) 17:13, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That link is blacklisted, so it's impossible.--十八 22:35, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Link
Talk:Word Freak

message: I have classified this article as a stub. It also needs to be referenced so I have added an unreferenced tag. Capitalistroadster 08:08, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Classified stub
Talk:Western Hills

message: Is Jade Spring Mountain (:zh:玉泉山) located in the Western Hills? Badagnani 15:52, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Jade Spring Mountain]]

message: In addition to the Haidian District, do the Western Hills comprise any of the Changping District, the Mentougou District, or the Fangshan District? Badagnani 16:22, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geography 

message: *Proposal - Merge Xishan Mountains into Western Hills. More commonly used English usage. Badagnani 16:53, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal
Talk:1492 papal conclave

message: I'd just be careful with the Allegations of Simony section - it's NPOV leaning towards not exactly neutral - that's all. Cheers, Corvus coronoides 23:58, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The top image needs a fair use rationale. Epbr123 00:07, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's used in all the conclave articles. I'll add one that applies to all of them. Savidan 00:23, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA Review 

message: One annoying thing that is starting to impact historiography outside of Spain is Catalonian historical revisionism. I'm not a Spanish historian, however, saying that Borgia's nationality was Catalan is hopelessly out of touch. I changed it to "Kingdom of Valencia," which was part of the Crown of Aragon, but if somebody really wants to put something closer to nationality, Aragonese might be more accurate. That being said, I think listing "nationality" in this particular era is a little absurd.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:300:8100:6BDE:457E:6F37:F1DB:61D5 (talk) 19:34, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Catalan Nationalism 

message: According to the Vote count section, on the first ballot there were "nine votes for Carafa, seven for Borja, Costa, and Michiel, and five for Giuliano della Rovere", while on the second there were "nine for Carafa, eight for Borja, seven for Michiel, and five for Giuliano della Rovere". That makes 35 and 29 votes, respectively. But there were only 23 electors. Can anybody explain this discrepancy?  95.44.50.222 (talk) 13:49, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discrepancy in vote count
Talk:Soma (song)

message: VIRTUOSO?
Are you kidding or what?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.6.244.50 (talk) 12:51, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "VIRTUOSO" guitar solo? 

message: This article is only a stub and most likely can't be expanded. This obviously needs to merge with the Siamese Dream article. --Mrmoustache14 (talk) 20:19, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:NTO

message: One list of acronyms has 41 NTOs.  Non traditional occupation is there but not Non traditional outlet.  Google gives 6 hits for No Tom Order of which four are this Wikipedia article or its copies, the other two are uninformative past pages, one with a we-have-moved redirection to a site which appears inaccessible or non-existent.  All that lacks sources and references. The article might benefit from some excision.  
Neither of the editors adding Non traditional outlet and No Tom Order bothered to amend the restrictive category chemical compounds. (Note for misunderstanding jumpers-in: The top two NTOs are such compounds. The other two NTOs are not.) --SilasW 09:05, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Talk
Talk:My-Otome Zwei

message: Trying to improve the Zwei page now that the final episode has been released, a good benchmark would be the Oh My Goddess! (OVA) page, feel free to do any corrections. Agent Low 09:32, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Separated from the project info box.じんない 02:42, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Improve
Talk:Person or Persons Unknown

message: The premise of this episode is remarkably similar to the 1995 UPN series Nowhere Man.
Apart from this, the premise is quite similar to Philip K. Dick's novel Flow My Tears, the Policeman Said. 77.46.182.227 09:18, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Agreed.  This should be removed if it can't be sourced to something that discussed this specific episode.Arnold Rothstein1921 (talk) 13:56, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Seinfeld material removed.Arnold Rothstein1921 (talk) 16:30, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Monte Iberia eleuth

message: According to National Geographic in 1996 this is the second smallest frog (and amphibian) after the Brazilian Gold Frog. See my comment on the Frog discussion page  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Anshelm '77 (talk • contribs) 18:40, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second smallest 
Talk:Portland Hospital

message: The info about this particular baby being born at this hospital does not seem to have been confirmed. Tacyarg (talk) 00:04, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed that it has not been confirmed by the Sussexes. A lot of papers, rightly or wrongly, are reporting on it. Dormskirk (talk) 08:32, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Archie Mountbatten-Windsor]] 

message: I feel coverage of deaths is too long, if we are to compare it with the total body of the article. Cinadon36 07:33, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is there undue weight to certain deaths that took place at Portland Hospital? 

message: I dont get the reasoning. The whole list looks  like original research anyway...Cinadon36 07:37, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should there be a different list for royalties and others at Notable births section?
Talk:Districts of China

message: Although this article is quite short, it is still confusing since the concept of district in PRC is different of that in ROC. For reducing confusion and maintaining consistency, I propose for splitting this article into three. One is about ancient China and in general form (may be named District (China)), another is about PRC (may be named District (PRC)), and one is about ROC (may be named District (ROC)). QQ (talk) 12:53, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I was bold and did it. The previous arrangement in one article was too confusing. Heroeswithmetaphors (talk) 12:25, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The districts in ROC and PRC are highly relevant. It's good to maintain a main page for District (China) to introduce the general information. I have added District (ROC) and District (PRC) as the main articles for the relevant sections in District (China). Hope this is fine for us. --Neo-Jay (talk) 05:49, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal for splitting 

message: Note that this is entirely incorrect. The current article on Government of the Han dynasty discusses districts as subdivisions of the counties and is translating an entirely different term. — LlywelynII 17:13, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Historical sense
Talk:Phyllis Brooks

message: Regarding this text: Brooks was born Phyllis Weiler (some sources cite Phyllis Steiller as her birth name.)  there is something odd. If she were born Weiler or Steiller, how come her brother was writer Norman A. Brooks? If she wasn't born with the surname Brooks but both she and her only known sibling carried that surname then it may have been via adoption by a stepfather. Just conjecture I know. More info should be available from ancestry.com next time I go to the library. For now "birthname" speculation should be left out, IMO. Quis separabit? 16:17, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Birthname
Talk:Queen Elizabeth II Centre

message: There have always been rumours about government or military bunkers and tunnels underneath this building, which was constructed at the height of the cold war and also during a period of internal civil strife. The fact that the government retains direct ownership despite 30 years of privatisation is also odd. Does anybody have any WP:RS info about this? --Ef80 (talk) 12:27, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bunkers