lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Alastair

message: * I think that the page is good but a bit biased because the spelling of Alastair is spelt Alastair when a more common version is Alistair. Mouseinthehouse 12:01, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

message: * I still think that the title of the page should be a more common version of the name. Mouseinthehouse 11:33, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biased 

message: * The article currently says that there are 27 variations, but more are being added. Should the number be updated to the number in the list, re-researched (change reference) or simply removed? Comments... Ajn91 12:03, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of variations
Talk:Pelorovis

message: this edit was done by altailepard, who has forgotten to sign in. If you have any questions, just ask on my talk.--Altaileopard 12:13, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, that hasn't been determined at all. It is a theory by promulgated by Henri Lhote who believed that the rock art in North Africa depicted hartebeest instead of Pelorovis. He took this, as well as images of elephants, giraffes and other species now restricted sub-Saharan Africa, to be easily explained by means of trips in spaceships which past people took with aliens. Leo Breman (talk) 02:11, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

message: The sentense "which first appeared in the Pliocene, 2.5 million years ago" is somewhat contradictory.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.81.1.234 (talk) 18:00, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  2.5 M.a. in Pliocene? 

message: Regarding "to be easily explained by means of trips in spaceships which past peoples took with extraterrestrial aliens" attributed to Henri Lhote, can anyone with access to the source verify this?   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  04:46, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aliens 

message: Now we're talking, I was reading a few more papers last night and must concede the taxonomic interpretation of Martínez-Navarro et al. is looking more and more compelling. See reference 5, 6 and these: Thoughts? Leo Breman (talk) 13:31, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: This genus is being treated as a synonym of ''Bos'' in newer lit

message: The article mentions Pelorovis going extinct 'even during the Holocene, 4,000 years ago'. Last time I checked, this was (possibly) true for Syncerus antiquus, which used to be within Pelorovis, so I'm guessing that's where that's from. Are there any sources that discuss actual Pelorovis sp. remains or rock art possibly dating to that time period, or does this just pertain to S. antiquus back when it was included within Pelorovis? If so, can this part be removed? Cathartornis (talk) 18:11, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: . Hemiauchenia (talk) 18:27, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extinction date
Talk:I masnadieri

message: i am compelled to write quickly, ignoring what are likely critical rules regarding commenting, so i shall say, merely, this: best synopsis EVAR.
66.117.148.60 07:44, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Luisa Miller

message: The article says: "There have been reasonably frequent performances at the Metropolitan Opera in New York from 1929 to 2006". I would not say so. After 6 performances of the first 1929 production in 1929-1930 there was a 38 years long gap! Source: MET database 89.77.33.100 (talk) 16:30, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, and have adjusted the text to reveal the 38-year gap. "Reasonably frequently" might apply from 1968 onward. Viva-Verdi (talk) 17:03, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Luisa Miller in MET 

message: Please add only commercial recordings, commercial historical labels, e.g. Naxos Historical, Opera d'Oro, Myto, Testament Records, or Marston Records, and live recordings released  and sold by opera companies and/or broadcasting companies themselves.  Do not add recordings with the "labels": Live Opera, Celestial Audio, Premiere Opera (and its earlier version Legato Classics), Live Opera Heaven, and House of Opera. They are not record labels. They are private bootleg companies that produce on demand copies of off-air recordings and others taped by private individuals during actual performances. Virtually all of them are copyright violations. All such additions should be promptly removed. Voceditenore (talk) 04:46, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Do not add bootleg recordings to the Recordings section

message: Hi, The YouTube videos are unavailable. --אמא של גולן (talk) 12:24, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Broken link
Talk:Stiffelio

message: See here. --Kleinzach 08:09, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Discussion started --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:13, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two navboxes with the same content 
MediaWiki talk:Allmessages/is

message: This should be Meldingar --Steinninn 12:17, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ... it is – 81.153.158.137 10:17, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yea, well. Now that I've fixed it with BetaWiki it is. But when I wrote the message, it wasn't. --Steinninn 12:10, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: atake 124.104.202.163 (talk) 06:52, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
Talk:Yoyogi Park

message: In the 1950s this was the sight of Washington Heights. I was an extensive housing area for dependants from the U.S. forces stationed in the area. It included Despensary, Theater, Chapel, PX, Commissary, Club House with pool, and Yoyogi Elementary School (which I attended). It covered the area of the park and the Olimpic area to the South. 00:14, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yoyogi park/Washington Heights 

message: "In the bid to host the 2016 Summer Olympics, Tokyo Governor Shintaro Ishihara announced plans to build a stadium -- with room for 100,000 -- in Yoyogi Park."
This is incorrect. The 100,000 seat main Olympic Arena would have been built on the waterfront, not in Yoyogi Park. the Proposed Yoyogi Park Arena would have been for volley ball.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Donlammers (talk • contribs) 01:57, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The proposed Yoyogi Park Arena 
Talk:Simon Boccanegra

message: Should the article describe the differences between the first and revised versions? At least I would love to know!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.186.20.153 (talk) 23:20, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: There is certainly no reason why not. Sometimes, as with Macbeth (opera) differences are noted in the synopsis.  If someone with a score of the early version or a recording of it could note the differences (one being the absence of the Act 1 finale Council Chamber scene), that would be useful. Viva-Verdi (talk) 23:50, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Differences between versions

message: thumb|150px|Carlo Negrini, the first Gabriele in the 1857 original
These three images were used without attribution to which revision they premièred. They were also next to a role table, and on narrow monitors, form a column above the role table three images high. If they're to be used, please, please put them somewhere else, and be very clear to which revision they're firsts from. Adam Cuerden (talk) 07:54, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Singer images 

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Giuseppe Verdi, Simon Boccanegra first edition libretto for the 1881 revision of the opera - Restoration.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on June 22, 2018. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2018-06-22. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:33, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Giuseppe Verdi, Simon Boccanegra first edition libretto for the 1881 revision of the opera - Restoration.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon
Talk:Harald Eiriksson

message: I was looking for refs for this article and found this that states he was a king. Could someone clarify? ErikTheBikeMan (talk) 19:55, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you have found Harald II of Norway, who also was a Harald Eiriksson. Both the names Haraldr (Harold) and Eiríkr (Eric) were common names among Norse royalty and aristocracy, so it's no surprise to find several "Harald Eiriksson" among them.--Berig (talk) 20:10, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok. ErikTheBikeMan (talk) 03:00, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Heinrik Haraldsson

message: I am not familiar with this period of Orcadian history, but initially I can see no evidence that this individual was ever Earl of Orkney. He is mentioned as a son of Harald Maddaddson in the OS, but not as earl so far as I can see, and he does not seem to be mentioned by Thomson (2008) or Muir (2005). Ben MacDui 17:10, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Earl
Talk:Toward the Terra

message: The anime character designs look nothing like the manga. Surely there must have been some critisism about that.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.161.122.193 (talk) 14:22, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Critisism? 

message: Before posting links. You guys should check first to see if the site exists. If it doesn't. Then don't post the link.Zeta Nova 10:44, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Posting Links

message: In the article i found 2 sub-article / entries for the 1980 movie.... One is titled "Movie" the other is titled "Animated film", since from what i read the two are talking about the completely same thing, i removed the "Animated Film" one, since it's contain less information than the former... Lolipedofin (talk) 01:13, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  2 entries for the movies 

message: I'd like to know where you found out that the manga has been reprinted by Square Enix in 2007. I'd like to add it on the French page of Toward the Terra...But I need to check the information first (I don't understand japanese...). 
- 82.67.61.214 (talk) 15:13, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Manga(Original one) reprinted?
Talk:Moral sense

message: I really wonder whether the current redirection of moral sense to disgust is appropriate. To my understanding, disgust refers primarily to a bodily feeling like hunger or thirst, whereas moral sense is more subtle, like the sense of sight, hearing, or even better intuitions about how the world works, how the space is shaped and the like. --Dan Polansky 12:41, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: But Wiktionary on disgust shows I was mistaken. Still, having a dedicated article on moral sense would be appropriate, wouldn't it? --Dan Polansky 12:44, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Moral sense should have it's own article.  The moral sense doesn't necessarily involve disgust, anyway.  On most accounts, it involves emotions of praise, etc. as well. The moral sense is primarily a faculty posited by moral sense theorists (also known as sentimentalists) that allows one to know moral truths.  It's a meta-ethical theory about the epistemology of morality.  I'm going to change the redirect from disgust to moral sense theory and try to get an article going on moral sense theories. - Jaymay 06:56, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect to Disgust?
Talk:Yang di-Pertuan Besar

message: I do not agree about merging this page because this page is about the term not the state of NS.Wai Hong 12:46, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, merging does not make sense. The title Yang di-Pertuan Besar is not unique to Negeri Sembilan as other Malay states and Indonesia uses it. I am removing the merge tag. --Eqdoktor 09:53, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Montévrain

message: I've updated the population based on the census numbers on this (official) page: http://www.insee.fr/fr/ppp/bases-de-donnees/recensement/populations-legales/departement.asp?dep=77&annee=2009#dep_M. Not sure how to cite it. I'll try and add that in later. 0x0077BE (talk) 19:32, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Prince Who Turns into a Frog

message: Very expansive article, but the tone is a bit POV and there's no references whatsoever. It also needs something asserting notability; links to reviews from reliable sources, news articles, anything even vaguely reliable. Lucky number 49 00:25, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability & References

message: Is this necessary?  This doesnt add any content to the article and it's more like a trivia thing than fact.  Eleoopy (talk) 02:34, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Title Section
Talk:Blændværk

message: I'm puzzled. I came across this page looking for examples of Danish-to-English translations in progress, only to find that the english article has more info than the danish. That the english article reads like a patch of gravel. And that there's absolutely no information on, say, when the movie is set: I'm guessing WW2, during the German occupation of Denmark, since I don't know why there'd be such a thing as a saboteur in there...   As you might be able to tell, I haven't actually seen the movie, but in this case, that's probably my strongest selling point: The article doesn't make me any more knowledgable on the subject!  Smolk (talk) 03:21, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's this? 
Talk:Laksamana

message: I'm sure that Laksamana is also a position in the Johor Sultanate. I'm not sure whether other Malay sultanates have this post. I want to change the leading sentence to some thing that's more appropriate. Any experts on Malay history? Please enlighten me.Wai Hong 12:58, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Use of the term
Talk:Flynas

message: edit has been reverted twice (, ), as it is not in line with one of the core content policies. More specifically, according to WP:VERIFY, sources should be provided when adding/changing information.--Jetstreamer  18:59, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Regarding unsourced changes, please note that I've reverted the last three edits in a row made by  (). The modifications are not in agreement with the sources already in the article. There's an ongoing discussion regarding the matter at WT:AIRLINE.--Jetstreamer  17:54, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced changes reverted 

message: * 
*
--Jetstreamer  13:43, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archived references not used in the article 

message: edit has been reverted again. Reference named ″Flynas takes delivery of first A330″ says ″Previously an all-A320 operator, flynas is leasing three A330s—two -200s and a -300—from Portugal’s Hi Fly″. The airline initially leased three A330s, two –200s and one –300. Crystal clear.--Jetstreamer  00:34, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I've crossed out the above comment. The IP was right: ch-aviation shows one A330-200 and two A330-300s were on lease from Hi-Fly. I've amended the text to reflect this.--Jetstreamer  01:26, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unreferenced changes reverted
Category talk:Squid

message: So far every squid stub is a member of both the "Squid Stubs" and "Squid" categories. The former is a subcategory of the latter, so do you want me to just remove the stubs from the main squid category and keep them combined to the stub subcategory? Abyssal leviathin 03:40, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Overlap with Squid Stubs
Category talk:Place name etymologies

message: Most of the articles in this category should be moved to "Etymology of ...". Catchpoke (talk) 04:35, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: go see a psychiatristCatchpoke (talk) 12:01, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: You're the one who made this topic while discussion was open at WP:ANI. If you're going to call hounding, you're going to be smacked with a boomerang again. – The Grid (talk)  04:19, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a talk page comment.  Why didn't he follow me here?  And now you are WP:HOUNDING me too so get lost! Catchpoke (talk) 19:26, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:RM]]
Talk:Nerf bar

message: Does anybody know what "NERF" in Nerf bar stands for?
It isn't an acronym. The NERF trademark for foam toys has been backronymed to mean Non Expanding Recreational Foam, but the nerf bar predates the Nerf toy. 202.64.222.170 (talk) 03:12, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

message: In 1950s hot-rod culture, the verb "nerf" meant to push a car to get it started, hence a nerf bar on the rear. With midget racers, nerfing was the only way to get it started. It was also spelled "knerf." 2600:4040:5D38:1600:A983:4ADD:CEB5:5EEE (talk) 13:24, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gimme a Push
Talk:Montilla-Moriles

message: I translated this page from the official Montilla-Moriles DO page (http://www.montilla-moriles.org/principal.html).
I suppose this is what is called a "stub", no?
I'm still not sure whether one is allowed to copy photos or not, so for the time being I'm playing it safe and not copying any! Slowly but surely does it!! --BodegasAmbite 13:28, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:The Education of Charlie Banks

message: It was made in Providence, RI, but somehow won the award for 'best film made in New York' at the Tribeca Film Festival?  Ford MF 23:14, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Film awards

message: By Bridgett Alden (BridgettAlden)
       😂LMFAO at Norman Wilner (of NOW)'s scathing, but oh-so-accurate, critique of Jesse Eisenberg's performance:       "blandly conceived version of the characters he usually portrays," adding, "He does the required stammering and shrugging... on autopilot." Omfg, Hilarious! He really does always play the same character! Hahaha              *************POSTSCRIPT*************: Oh, the Blasphemy! My laughter has become slightly subdued because a few moments ago, it suddenly dawned on me that Jesse Eisenberg's ONE character is simply a bile-laden, Teenaged (READ: bratty and entitled) regurgitation of Jeff Goldblum's brilliantly imagined and beloved "Overly-Explanatory, Eccentric Genius" character! In case anyone believes they disagree with me, and also as a courtesy to all of those reading this who've lived out their entire lives under a rock and thus do not know the character of whom I speak, I am ending my comment with a full description of said character for future discussion of this topic. I humbly give to you my written offering for what I think should OFFICIALLY be the newest Wikipedia Entry (filed under the "Pop Culture" Category). Please Enjoy and Discuss:                                                       The "Overly Explanatory, Eccentric Genius"  Character:  Jeff Goldblum's classic plebian AntiHero, ever preoccupied by his grandiose I.Q. and its accompanying assortment of lofty, "higher" ideas (of the sort we COMMON-minded folk find hard to grasp; but thankfully for us, and for the audience, he conveniently verbalizes all of his brain's timely and important info for us (ex: an uber-condensed "Idiots Guide to Quantum Physics", or maybe, say, his newly dreamed up instructions for How to Destroy the Alien MotherShip and Save All of Mankind) in brief and concise, explicit detail, AND THEN he (goddamnhelpfully) SAYS IT ALL OVER AGAIN (!), THIS time in "layman's terms"(rapidly and excitedly, keeping the viewer engaged). He possesses an innate and comfortable air of relatability, and tops it all off with natural comedic flair and timing. He is the ORIGINAL "Cool Nerd," and will never fail to delight us with ample helpings of the aforementioned stutters and stammers that, thanks to Jeff Goldblum, are now firmly imbedded in our Collective American Psyche and that we've all come to (rightly) expect from any Scientist-Slash-Nerd that's worth his "NaCl".  
  
BridgettAlden (talk) 18:34, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jesse Eisenberg & The Jeff Goldblum Connection
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Unification theory (2nd nomination)

message: However i have to say, as stated before that you might not like string theory because it is not proved bu you dont delete it: it is a theory!. and you might not like organicism and GST but it is a theory with over 50.000 scientists working on different versions of it.) - 81.41.234.221
:*Comment.  The problem remains that virtually all content of consequence in this article is scientifically wrong.  Not to mention that this reads like an essay.  If you can't provide sources for all or at least most of the information contained within (English sources, preferably), there is no choice but to delete this.  Someguy1221 10:02, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Prove that your philosphy is in any way notable and it can stay.  Someguy1221 17:07, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

text: And I might not be an expert on GST but I know enough science to recognize bollocks.  Someguy1221 17:08, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

message: * Delete, per WP:NOR and WP:FRINGE. Amazingly this article version looks rather different than the previously deleted one (are there two fringe theories by this name?), so CSD G4 doesn't apply. After deletion a disambih should be created, pointing to the topics in physics and artificial intelligence respectively. To the anom editor: I can't fully exclude the possibility, that there is something worth including in all this, but you just didn't get the message across in this attempt. Do some reading in Wikipedia, both articles and policies, starting with WP:5P. Ask at the Philosophy Portal for suggestions. --Pjacobi 21:42, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Even more
Template talk:Newcastle United F.C. managers

message: Just to remind everyone that the template does not include caretaker managers, so I've removed Nigel Pearson. Bababoum 13:59, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Caretakers not included 

message: Hi. I am involved for WikiProject Football in making good the article Bobby Robson. I have made all date ranges in the template XXXX-XX, except for span of centuries i.e. Bobby Robson 1999-2004. There was previously a mixture of styles. Thanks. Ref (chew)(do) 20:53, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Standardised date ranges 

message: I see no problem to add the caretaker into the list with notation.... Kkkc 03:44, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should we include caretaker
Talk:Ropucha-class landing ship

message: (I am argentinian, my english it s bad)
The Ivan Green class Landing Ship Tank it's the sucessor of the alligator class lst, but what it's the sucessor of the ropucha II lst. My opinion.....the ropucha II not have a sucessor or the ivan green it's a sucessor of the alligator class and the ropucha II class. Please respond/answer. Juakoblabla (talk) 14:25, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Ropucha II Sucessor

message: :: Copied from Talk:Russian ship Caesar Kunikov
In the video the number on the ship in the front resembles "58", a "1" is not visible however (scraped off? or completely different ship?), so if the decision is between only the two ships mentioned here, I'd say the Novocherkassk is the one in the back with the quite intense fire on the foredeck. However, one can also see a bit of smoke from the ship in the front (though that might only be smoldering debris blown over from the Saratov at the dock).--OBrian (talk) 12:32, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ropuchas from Berdiansk 

message: I left the ship as active because the cite provided links to this tweet , which states that is "likely beyond economic repair" which is different than "is beyond economic repair". The first is supposition and not backed by proof. The second would be fact. Therefore the cite cannot be used to back up that statement. Llammakey (talk) 18:34, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minsk 

message: What does 'BDK' mean, as in the caption "BDK Alexander Shabalin"? Nurg (talk) 22:48, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: BDK is a Russian acronym which means Bolshoi Desantryy Korabl (I may have misspelled that, I wrote it quickly when I took the note) which means Large Landing Ship.* Llammakey (talk) 00:07, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: BDK?