lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ashe

message: Please don't redirect it to List of Final Fantasy XII characters without going through proper channels first. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 23:26, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: What "proper channels" would those be? It's been discussed at length on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Final Fantasy as well as Talk:List of Final Fantasy XII characters, where the consensus was to merge (at least for the time being). – Seancdaug 01:03, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: With a transition period... --QubitOtaku (talk) 01:16, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: What was the whole protracted dicussion at both of the above pages if not exactly that? – Seancdaug 01:19, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The whole discussion was a waste of time for me, I don't think anything changed... we couldn't agree on how long an article should be before we allow its own.  We discussed a transition period to keep articles until the information was sent over, but that seems to be lost.  --QubitOtaku (talk) 01:28, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Qubit, we did agree on a transition period, but in the context of Final Fantasy IX articles. You had already agreed to wait until the release of Final Fantasy XII before revisiting this particular issue. I see you have since changed your mind on that point, but I am not telepathic and I can only assume that your comments reflect your actual opinions. And regarding the issue of "how long," while the particulars remained unresolved, I would once more point out that numerous character entries in other lists (notably List of Final Fantasy VI characters) are already longer than this article, and in the months that that has been the case, there have been no complaints. I apologize for any confusion, but I was frankly unaware that the question, as it related to the particulars of this article, was still unresolved. – Seancdaug 02:00, 25 December 2005 (UTC)

text: I meant with something like . Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 00:33, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, fair point. I was just being bold, and figured that there'd already been substantial discussion and consensus behind the merger (apparently, I was wrong, but that's another story...). – Seancdaug 02:50, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[List of Final Fantasy XII characters|List of ''Final Fantasy XII'' characters]] 

message: All else aside, it seems a little silly to have an infobox that communicates such little information: most of the entries are non-starters (are there even classes in the game, in the classic sense?), and the useful information that is there is repeated within the first couple of sentences in the article itself. Aesthetically, it just seems to clutter up the article without adding much of value. – Seancdaug 02:50, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do we really need an infobox?
Talk:Benefit

message: * Under English law it is an offence for A dishonestly to induce B to confer a benefit by doing some act, or causing or permitting some act to be done, on the understanding that the benefit has been or will be paid for: see Theft Act 1978.
As far as I can see, this just a statement that one form of theft is to defraud somone into giving you something, thinking it has been or will be paid for. The fact that it uses the word benefit is more a matter for a dictionary than an encyclopedia. If there is something more to this, it might deserve another article, but this page should just disambiguate and point to that. -- Jmabel | Talk 07:27, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Odd addition, cut

message: The Benefits of patrichal:
1. Without the Patriachal the family can ba complete.
2. The Patrichal is the head of the family.
3. Patriachal is the leader of one family.
Thank you!!
By: angelique blando!!!:)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.127.223.72 (talk) 00:33, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Benefit of Patriachal
Talk:Growth Hormone (treatment)

message: There is a comment in the article about use of insulin in conjuction with GH being dangerous.  I seem to recall a Body Builder (Samir Banouit?)dying of an insulin overdose shortly after the Arnold classic about 10 years ago.  Is this correct?64.128.36.73 17:43, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

message: User:Cavell contributed the initial paragraphs of this article to our large growth hormone article. I think it is an excellent topic and spun it off into its own article for enlargement. alteripse 07:29, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: source of new article
Talk:Atticus Kodiak

message: After edits by Walden15 that added a great deal of information along with many spoilers, I've reorganized the page.  The first section, Novels Featuring..., contains very few spoilers but gives enough info that someone wishing to learn a bit about the series and track down the books can do so.  This section has been edited to avoid spoilers.  The second section, Major Characters, not only has much of Walden15's info, but it also carries a big ol' spoiler warning.
If anyone has any problems with this organization, please discuss them here.Eric Qel-Droma 05:52, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewriting for Spoiler Protection

message: I am going to start building this page, if there are no objections. This will be the first time I've edited a wikipedia page, so please feel free to edit/amend it at will; I'll watch the changes and learn by example. Frailgesture 07:30, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Opening Post
Talk:Bethio

message: Can we get a reference on this?  The only hits seem to be Wikipedia mirrors.  --Dvyost 07:40, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Ganser syndrome

message: Why is this named Ganser syndrome?   Who is the namesake?--Hraefen 08:18, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Why

message: I think it would be helpful to point out the true association of psychosis in prisons which five times the population rate.
The results of this study have been confirmed by others: http://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/cgi/content/full/162/4/774
Notpayingthepsychiatrist (talk) 20:37, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  prevalence of true psychosis in prisons 

message: The current article says, "The syndrome tends to be more common in men (75%), with a male to female ratio of 4:1." Actually if 75% of people diagnosed are male, that's a ratio of 3:1, not 4:1. I don't have access to the 1967 British Journal of Psychiatry to check what the actual numbers are, or rather were 50 years ago.IAmNitpicking (talk) 19:37, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Epidemiology: proportions 

message: At the current state this article is at, its a mess, the contradiction of it being reffered to as a disorder, but then being assumed an excuse for prison inmates is confusing and messy, if one cannot be decided to be the actual definition, then the article needs to be divided up into the two different classifacations (dissociative and factitous, however the factitous part needs much clean up, as currently its very informal). if anybody has any other ideas please respond with them! ¿V0id? {have a great day!} (talk) 14:41, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orginization needed 

message: The term "hysterical" is outdated (and moderately offensive).
Suggest revision to replace with more modern term and/or note regarding terminology + internal link to page on hysteria. - Peach (talk) 19:14, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modernizing terminology
Talk:Putto

message: This article could be vastly improved with a photo or two... -Tim Rhymeless  (Er...let's shimmy) 08:22, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Photos

message: I agree with the proposed merger with "Amoretti" and there is also an agreement on the talk page for the redirect "Putti."Jlittlet 17:09, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?

message: I just wanted to say you, that amor or amoretto is not the same then putto. Becouse putto means in italian young boy and he atcs exsatcly in christian mithology and iconography. And Amor (in ancient Greece Eros), was a son of Venus (gr. Aphrodite) -and this is greek and later roman mithology - so please, don't make the same becouse is not the same - and I please you, bring your picture Venus with putto, out. Becouse he's not a putto bot an amor. Thank you. And I apologize for my bad English, but I really just can not see the mistake like this is.--Amazone7 01:41, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that the two articles should remain seperate, with links pointing to one another. MishaPan (talk) 21:20, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amoretto vs. Putto 

message: Doesn't the narrative of this article seem a bit too colloquial? "It would be too much to name..." etc. This seems to have been written by a fan of these statues or something, rather than a scholar.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.46.123.4 (talk) 21:09, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Too colloquial?

message: Hello everyone,
I don't know how to do this, but I think there should be a disambiguation page for Amoretti, e.g.
Amoretti = figure in Renaissance architecture, see Putto
Amoretti = sonnet cycle by Edmund Spenser, see Amoretti (poem)
Or something similar. Could somebody do this, please? Carmencantora (talk) 22:12, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation page
Talk:Broadcast delay

message: Maybe link to the article about the death broadcast on live television in 2004 that the text talks about? – Daniel Brockman 08:28, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The seconds-long delay should not be confused with the practice of recording a program (radio or television), broadcast in the Eastern portion of the United States, for later rebroadcast in the Western portion, generally in order to fit into prime time slots in both markets. This was commonly done as a more economically viable option to re-staging the entire program. Weeb Dingle (talk) 05:00, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  ought to be differentiated
Talk:Step function

message: I have removed the re-direct and given 'step change' an entry of its own. This is worth doing because the phrase is being adopted by the political propaganda people and the rest of us need to know what they are trying to say  so that we can ignore them in peace.  82.38.97.206 08:33, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds good, thanks. It is more appropriate that way than having that text in step function. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 17:09, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Step change

message: The current definition has all the intervals closed on the left and open on the right, but surely that isn't a necessary part of the definition? --ScottAlanHill 14:23, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. I guess one should mention that somehow. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 16:19, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Half-open intervals 

message: The lemma staircase function is a redirect to step function. However, this name does not appear in the article at all. Question: is this an equivalent synonym? --85.179.52.216 09:50, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Staircase function 

message: I removed the assumption that a step function must necessarily use half-open intervals. The function \chi_{[0, 1]} is an honest step function, for example. Also, I modified the notation 1_A to \chi_A\, which I think reads better. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 22:31, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent change 

message: Bullshit.
When people say step function, they mean Heaviside step function.
Either find some real references-- not just Wolfram-- or, better delete this article and make it a redirect. Geoffrey.landis (talk) 01:09, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delete and redirect.
Talk:Wife-carrying

message: Sorry. I thinkt that Wife Carring isn't dog word for this sport. What you think about "Carrying the Hag" bicause the lady isn't the wife but the hag...84.230.192.56 08:36, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Wife Carrying seems to be the english name for the sport, not a translation. --Easyas12c 08:27, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

text: Of course not, that would be ridiculous. --194.98.58.121 (talk) 11:57, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've moved some old page history that used to be at the title "Wife-carrying" to Talk:Wife-carrying/Old history. Graham87 08:50, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old page history
Talk:Paragon (band)

message: No reason for the hyphen to appear.
heavy metal-band = incorrect
heavy metal band = correct
203.214.112.124 09:01, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Move from [[Paragon (heavy metal-band)]]

message: Proposed on Wikipedia:Requested moves on February 25. Seems logical to me, and there is no opposition. The articles both had significant history following an earlier merge, so I have swapped them over, histories, talk pages and all. Andrewa 09:10, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Move from [[Paragon (heavy metal band)]]
Talk:David Powers

message: Warren Report, pp. 56, 59, 61, 64, 72; WC Vol 7, p. 473; The Witnesses, p. 39; Dallas Times Herald, 11/23/63, p. 2; Truth About the Assassination, p. 11
Just some citations I don't want to forget about. Gamaliel 09:14, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Would an interview with transcript with David Powers from 1986 be useful here as an external link? Focus of conversation is nuclear weapons policy. http://openvault.wgbh.org/catalog/V_8946E771A345459DA076BD20131B96CB (I have a conflict of interest; otherwise I would add it myself.) Mccallucc (talk) 15:01, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External link? 
Talk:RSO Records

message: Correct Trivia entry for BD Records (from "the 'Big Disco' company") to Big Deal Records (see movie: 0:14:50). There was no mention of "Big Disco Company" in the movie but there was a "Big Disco" title (0:32:57), which may have caused some confusion.
(Also added headings and section titles to the Talk Page. I read and tried to follow the guidelines; please correct them if I did it incorrectly.)
Uncle Bubba (talk) 11:27, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "BD Records"

message: Robert Stigwood Organisation redirects here, but it was not only a record label, it was a film and TV production company that was active mainly in the 70's. link This is only referred to in the line "RSO's movie version of Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band crippled the company." Tehw1k1 (talk) 18:56, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Robert Stigwood Organisation redirect
Talk:Microverse

message: In Peter David's Captain Marvel, it was revealed that a behind-the-scenes conflict between Baron Karza and Thanos had resulted in all of the Microverses being merged into a single Microverse. This, of course, impacts the Micronauts, Jarella's world from the Hulk's comics, Sub-Atomica of the Fantastic Four, and several other realms. Revisions are in order. DoctorWorm7 09:49, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Single Microverse 

message: As informative as these articles are, they would be more helpful if they included the issue numbers of the stories to which they refer.  For instance, where this article says "The first Microverse visited by the Fantastic Four was one which Doctor Doom had actually been sent to." it should say "The first Microverse visited by the Fantastic Four was one which Doctor Doom had actually been sent to (Fantastic Four #16)."
With this information one can easily find the year the comic came out (1963), the title of the story (The Micro World of Doctor Doom", and the names of the artists and writer, as well as other related info.Thetrellan (talk) 20:11, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which specific issues?
Talk:Mercedes-Benz W123

message: these cars are regarded by many as the pinnacle of mercedes cars, i'm surprised theres not more about that. its also said all over the internet that the diesel cars are just about the most reliable cars ever made, this is a story i've read more than once--Santahul 22:07, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: By me, for starters. There are a few outside my house, much to my wife's annoyance. ;) The article could really be expanded a lot, if we could find some better sources. I might have a look for some later. CiaranG 22:10, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

text: Having owned a W123 and a W124 for, respectively, 12 and 18 years, I tend to believe that overall the W124 slightly better than the W123. If the shock absorbers of a W123 are not in good condition, it  becomes a very lousy drive on wet roads, whereas the W124's multi-link rear suspension is much more forgiving. As for reliability... I really can't know. Both series are heavily over-engineered.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.39.125.251 (talk) 17:52, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

text: These things are bulletproof. My 1984 W123 was my daily driver for 7 years, and I still have it. The engines last over half a million miles, regularly. I've seen these things still operating as taxis in so many countries: India, Liberia, Kenya. I think more info on longevity needs to be in here. Skirts89 (talk) 15:20, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  reputation 

message: Three pictures of a German car, and all three are US ones? Not exactly representative of the car, particularly given the odd headlight design depicted.  --KJBracey 16:38, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need better pictures 

message: There's quite a strong United States bias on this page. I've replaced the infobox image with the one used on the German page. There is a heap of useful information at de:Mercedes-Benz W123 which could be incorporated into the article - for example, the second life of many European models in Africa and Asia is completely unmentioned here on en: so far. doco (☏) 05:13, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Systemic US bias 

message: The beginning of the article needs more specific information to explain the difference between W123 and its predecessor, W115. This article notes that W123 is 'larger', but what were the exact changes in dimensions? What motivated these changes? I'm told that mechanics prefer working on W123 compared to W115, that W123 was a more 'user-friendly' chassis -- though this might also have to do with the shift from the 615 to the 616 engine for the diesel models. 192.234.13.19 (talk) 17:14, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  more details 

message: Whatis  the best oil for w123 156.195.207.86 (talk) 01:32, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whatis  the best oil for w123
Talk:Ayr Pavilion

message: Since this article deals with an event that took place in an aircraft hangar, shouldn't its title be Hangar 13? QuicksilverT @ 10:15, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Why cant the doors on buildings be the x butten and the to enter a vehicle is y   or at least let me and others change itTigertank909 (talk) 04:11, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plz change 
Talk:Michael Mantler

message: SHould this page be called Michael Mantler?? Also, it needs wikifying, and according to his website he moved to the USA in 1964. Tim Fellows 10:22, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name 

message: A good bit of this page seems to be cut and pasted from mantlermusic.com. Unless express permission to distribute this content under the GFDL or a GFDL-compatible license is granted, this content must be rewritten or deleted from Wikipedia. --Dystopos 00:26, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In addition, the article needs to be cleaned up considerably — wikified, lots of capitals made lower case, etc. --Mel Etitis  (Μελ Ετητης) 16:49, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

text: See the the link GFDL --BNutzer 06:44, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:Copyrights|Copyright]]
Talk:Figure skating at the 1960 Winter Olympics

message: I converted these to tables:
Women's singles:
*Gold: Carol Heiss - United States
*Silver: Sjoukje Dijkstra - Netherlands
*Bronze: Barbara Roles - United States
Men's singles:
*Gold: David Jenkins - United States
*Silver: Karol Divin - Czechoslovakia
*Bronze: Donald Jackson - Canada
Mixed pairs:
*Gold: Barbara Wagner & Robert Paul - Canada
*Silver: Marika Kilius & Hans-Jürgen Bäumler - FRG
*Bronze: Nancy Ludington & Ronald Ludington - United States
Trekphiler 10:23, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  
Talk:Planetary romance

message: If merged, Planetary romance should be the main article, and Sword and Planet the see reference. BPK 10:30, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Sword and Planet vs. Planetary Romance

message: Should Aelita (novel) and Aelita be mentioned?
They provide an alternate and non-Anglospheric perspective.
--84.20.17.84 14:10, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: From the synopsis in the WP article, the novel would not seem to fit the planetary romance model very well--it sounds as close to Wells's First Men in the Moon as to the near-contemporary examples cited here (Burroughs, Brackett, Moore). RLetson (talk) 06:03, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aelita 

message: Shouldn't there be some source for their inclusion ? Isn't it OR to just include them ? -- Beardo (talk) 12:44, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of examples 

message: "It is difficult to find films that are recognized in critical references as being planetary romances, or that transparently satisfy the definition of being mainly planet-bound adventures."
Difficult for whom? Avatar, John Carter? 80.98.146.68 (talk) 13:51, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Note that the term is indeed pretty much absent from discussions of film/TV SF. It arose in literary criticism and even there is not all that often used. And the list of films that might "transparently" fit the definition is pretty short. RLetson (talk) 23:13, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Films 

message: I have proposed at Talk:Sword and planet that that page should redirect here.  See that page for discussion. Mike Christie (talk - contribs -  library) 02:03, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to redirect [[sword and planet]] here
Talk:East Asian calligraphy

message: Chinese calligraphy expanded over such a long time that I believe we should talk about calligraphers, either deviding them by the style they are known for (such as the grass hand) or by dynasty.
:Go ahead! (I forgot everything about shufa, bleh.) -- Миборовский U|T|C|E|Chugoku Banzai! 07:35, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need more calligrapher names 

message: This has been discussed in Talk:East_Asian_calligraphy. Opposition has only been voiced by one Wikipedian in 2006. In the most recent discussion, there were only proponents of renaming. Opportunity for opposition has been given. No opposition has been voiced. Asoer (talk) 01:03, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moving article contents back here.
Talk:Tara (Hindu goddess)

message: Need reference for the female Taraka. The male Taraka is generally known, although the details change slightly, such as being a Daitya. However, the mother of Maricha is Tataka, according to Vettam Mani, Puranic encyclopaedia. Imc 10:34, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Absolutely right. Needs splitting. Karthik.raman 04:22, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled
Talk:Illuyanka

message: In Greek, the tradition is to quote the nominative of terms in English text; in Sanskrit, the tradition is to quote stems, not nominatives. Hittite philology is younger than either Greek or Sanskrit philology, and both traditions may be observed. It is however more common, and more defensible, to use the stem forms, and we have so far tended to follow this on Wikipedia, see Wikipedia:WikiProject_Ancient_Near_East#Orthography. (illui)-anka to the best of my knowledge i thematic in Hittite, regardless of the stem classes of its cognates, ahi, azi, anguis. dab (ᛏ) 10:36, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: quotation form

message: :"The Sky God Teshub tells his son to ask for his eyes and heart as a wedding gift, and he does so."
Whose gift to whome? Next sentence Teshub has two eyes and a heart ... why? Who gives whome the two eyes and a heart? Clarification needed. ... said: Rursus (bork²) 18:39, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Huh

message: Hardly; PIE is not currently thought to have had long consonants. The Anatolian languages developed long consonants behind stressed short vowels (under circumstances I don't remember). Somebody should look this stuff up. David Marjanović (talk) 14:28, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proto-Indo-European -ll-?