lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Cửu Long province

message: Article needs literal meaning of this province name, and Han Tu. Badagnani 08:27, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This province was created in 1976 when Vietnamese did not use "Han Tu" for a very long time. So, why does Cuu Long need note for it's name? So if you please, I would like to remove the "Han Tu" from this article. Rungbachduong (talk) 00:00, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

text: You are right! Because this province's name was derived from the "river" (in fact, a river system) vi:Cửu Long Giang (九龍江) which was named before 1945. Rungbachduong (talk) 00:11, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Literal meaning/Han Tu
Talk:Ninh Bình province

message: Article needs literal meaning of this province name, and Han Tu. Badagnani 08:27, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Literal meaning/Han Tu
Talk:Hòa Bình province

message: Article needs literal meaning of this province name, and Han Tu. Badagnani 08:29, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Literal meaning/Han Tu

message: :Hòa Bình province →  – Revert capitalization to pre-Kauffner status and current consensus. NVanMinh (talk) 17:54, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 
Talk:Magdalo

message: *Support – disambiguation would be prudent. — •KvЯt GviЯnЭlБ• Speak! 02:55, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Splitting the article

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: page moved.  Arbitrarily0 (talk) 02:38, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Magdalo (disambiguation) →  – WP:NOPRIMARYTOPIC. Shwcz (talk) 22:06, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 2 November 2022
Talk:Association of Software Professionals

message: Here are some references as to the ASP's notability.  They don't really go in the article and I'm not sure where else to put them - hopefully this is right.
* ASSOCIATION OF SHAREWARE PROFESSIONALS: ASP members wa walk away with top honors. on M2 Presswire, , August 6, 1999.
*  Association of Shareware Professionals (ASP) Announces New Author Standards. on Businesswire, August 7, 1995.
* SHAREWARE: A MATTER OF TRUST PAYMENT? OPTIONAL. COPYING? NO PROBLEM. THAT MAKES IT WORK. Page C01, The Philadelphia Inquirer, June 21, 1993.
* PERSONAL TECHNOLOGY TECH REPORT ON TECHNOLOGY : Single CD-ROM offers giant haul of shareware, The Atlanta Journal and the Atlanta Constitution.
* TAKING SOFTWARE FOR A TEST DRIVE SIDEBAR: TO GET THERE FROM HERE The Boston Globe, October 27, 1995.
* PERIPHERALS;A Bountiful Grab Bag of Programs New York Times, April 30, 1996. 
* SOFTWARE; They Give It Away, Get Plenty Back New York Times June 13, 2001.
These were all sourced through Google News, which I believe makes them reputable sources for Wikipedia purposes.  Unfortunately many of them are pay-per-view but the article summary on Google News demonstrates that they are relevant. They all refer to the ASP in non-trivial ways. --Irrevenant [ talk ] 08:54, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The ASP currently has more than 800 members worldwide, and each of these members are either professional software companies or services used by software developers. Those members will have contributed to most of the applications currently running on your computer.Wallumbase (talk) 08:45, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Motion control

message: I can't find anything on the web mentioning (undefined) "Trans-mutational vector mapping" except for echos of this article, so I removed it. 67.122.210.104 (talk) 03:26, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: What's this?

message: 'This profile need not be salted, but it must be an animated function'. What is a salted profile? What is an animated function?
Added by another: Yeah, that's what I came in to "Talk" to ask too! I think salted is a mistake... And I (a mechanical engineer) personally have never heard of an "animated function".
109.152.26.89 (talk) 21:03, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Salted profile 

message: Merge this, Linear_actuator, Servomotor with Servomechanism etc... too small on it's own to be useful.
[User]: Macdaddy 87.114.239.214 (talk) 16:39, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  MERGE
Talk:Clan Rattray

message: Although I think they are unconnected, does anyone know of a link between Rattray, Aberdeenshire (in Buchan) and Clan Rattray? Originally it was referred to as Rettre and had a Comyn castle in the 13th century. Bobbacon 09:21, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Gal district

message: Even the author belongs to one of the "involving sides" the information is interesting enough. For those who can read in Russian
http://www.viu-online.ru/science/publ/bulleten20/page5.html  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Segnor Bugatti (talk • contribs) 17:10, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Information about ethno demografical history of Abkhaz regions inc. Samurzakan
Talk:List of prime ministers of Lebanon

message: It seems that Nureddin Rifai tendered his resignation a mere three days after accepting his post. This is reflected in numerous news sources that can be found in Google's news archive. I'm not sure when Karami was named to replace him (like 28 May). It is true that his cabinet first met on 1 July, but this means that he had to have taken the post earlier than this. Menaus (talk) 20:09, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Birth is supposed to be before death  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.30.202.36 (talk) 05:18, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The birth and death dates are reversed. 

message: Tammam Salam's name to be added on the list only after his to-be-formed government receives confidence from the Lebanese parliament. A.h. king • Talk to me! 13:26, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tammam Salam 
Talk:Ukrainian Studite Monks

message: Who authorized these brethren to call their establishment a "lavra" and when? --Ghirla-трёп- 10:04, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

message: This is not an objective historical treatment.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.161.203.6 (talk) 15:39, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tendentious Article
Talk:2007–08 Inter Milan season

message: This article is pretty poor, unsourced, full of unconfirmed players (Rivas and Cesar, for instance) and even wrong (how about the Barcelona shirts???). The squad template is quite ugly as well to me, it makes absolutely no sense to include birth date, total club appearances and goals in the "2007-08 season" article, these are info that might somewhat fit solely on List of F.C. Internazionale Milano players. I don't even want to comment about the start and end date for the players' contracts (where are the sources? what is the usefulness of this information?). In the end, please change the team colours, this is not Barcelona. And there is no prose content. --Angelo 10:15, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Squeeze Play!

message: There's still a lot more that could be said on this page, but at least I got the basics down for now. Skibz777 10:39, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Epistemic possibility

message: or similar modal terms that are sometimes confused (such as may be and might be),
# Hitler might have been victorious in World War II
# Hitler may have been victorious in World War II
Although these two statements are often confused with one another, they mean two different things
... this is ridiculous. "Might" and "may" do usually mean the exact same thing, and these sentences can mean the exact same thing. In a very specific lingo (like the topic of the article), assigning contrasting meanings to two words that are normally synonyms can certainly be useful; but to say that the people who are unaware that somewhere someone has decided that in a specific lingo the words should have contrasting meanings, are just often acting "confused", is... dumb. --VillemVillemVillem (talk) 03:42, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confused 

message: I don't find this rain example to be very enlightening. To me, the problem is that you are using two completely different sentences to try to show the distinction between epistemic and metaphysical possibility:
"It's possible that it is raining outside" vs. "It's possible for it to rain outside"
Of course they each mean something different, because they are completely different sentences. A better example is the Hitler example, except that I think you could go one step further and make those two statements exactly the same by using "might" or "may" in both of them, instead of each word in one sentence.
Doing so helps to show that the distinction is purely in terms of the epistemic or metaphysical possibility of the statement, and not just a trick of semantics (as I think the previous commenter is referring to in his confusion about might/may). --JohnJSal (talk) 21:34, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  It's possible that it's raining outside
Talk:Atlantis (Marvel Comics)

message: This article needs more context to show why this topic is notable.  When was this location created?  Who created it?  Which issues did it appear in?  How did it have impact on the real-world? For an example, see the lead of Atlantis (DC Comics). --Elonka 15:02, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Context needed
Talk:DragonMech

message: will someone who has actually played this game or wrote anything herein about it, please fix any references to Dungeons & Dragons to clearify that this game is not D&D related exactly but is a d20 fantasy game, and not an offshout of D&D. this will lead people to confusion where it states so many references to being D&D. i have cleaned up some to say that it is a d20 system game but as more is added or some things i missed they should be not so closely tied to D&D save for the genre or the fact that they are d20 system creations. shadzar|Talk|contribs 10:45, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Atlantis (Aquaman)

message: I moved it from a merge with Aquaman to a merge with Atlantis, as it seemed more appropiate.  Any thoughts?
Duggy 1138 (talk) 05:25, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, this is the right place to merge the stub to. - J Greb (talk) 11:43, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

text: Agreed. Moerge here. Certainly better than last proposal, which was to move that to Aquaman. ThuranX (talk) 12:44, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 
Talk:Haryanka dynasty

message: Following is a part from the article Shishunaga dynasty
 
both this haryanka dynasty and shishunaga are said to be the founder of magadha empire in 684 BC.. Which one is correct?--sunil 10:47, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Edits have been made. Haryanka is the correct founder succeeded by Shishunaga. Salilb (talk) 07:03, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Where does the Pradyota dynasty fit into this chronology?  I have added Pradyota dynasty to a new "See also" section, because I am uncertain where it fits into this Wikipedia article.  The Wikipedia article about the Pradyota dynasty says: "most of the Puranas (except a manuscript of the Brahmanda Purana, preserved in the University of Dhaka) say that this dynasty succeeded the Barhadratha dynasty in Magadha".  Does evidence prove that that is wrong, and that instead the Harynaka dynasty succeeded the Barhadratha dynasty?Anythingyouwant (talk) 01:43, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Pradyota dynasty

message: look at the map, the Haryana dynasty didn't rule over Bengal, where is the controversy? The lead literally says Magadha. At least have a base knowledge of Indian history before reverting me.193.60.198.37 (talk) 14:34, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I admit, it was a poor revert. Apologies. Talk page discussion is never a bad thing. – Teratix ₵ 23:01, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bengal
Talk:Hyunmoo-3

message: Since South Korea is a signatory to the NPT as a non-nuclear weapon state, it is illegal for it to acquire nuclear weapons. Therefore, this missile cannot legally carry a nuclear warhead.
Any reference to a nuclear warhead must be subtantiated or else must be removed from the article.
Also, the article says that South Korea canot produce weapons with a certain range/payload according to MTCR. This is untrue. South Korea and other MTCR nations cannot buy or sell technology beyond the payload/range restriction in MTCR, however, they are free to develop indegenous technologies without any restrictions.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.164.212.189 (talk) 18:22, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the meaning of nuclear warhead 

message: Is the missile subsonic or Mach 1.2? Design doesn't look supersonic to me with that wing. Hcobb (talk) 02:06, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speed issue
Talk:Raul M. Gonzalez

message: I supplied the citation link of suspension added the external links to prove the profile and add the latest news.
--Florentino floro 11:07, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This page was a mess and tagged for cleanup. I removed a lot of basically irrelevant details, for example, news items in which Gonzalez was mentioned but not prominent. I also took out a lot of stuff that was written in the midst of an event that is now finished, so the speculative bits stopped making sense. There was a whole lot about the kidney transplant that I trimmed down to a couple sentences that seem to me to tell the story. It's not perfect, but it's a lot better. axschme (talk) 04:24, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Major Cleanup

message: You all need to decide one standard last name. Each paragraph has something different. — Wyliepedia 05:51, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gonzalez, Gonzaléz, or Gonzales? 
Talk:Infanticide (zoology)

message: Perhaps it would be good to note that this is again fitted into the Gene-centered view of evolution in that the males of females would not invest in offspring when they suspect cuckoldry. There should be some reference to extra pair mating and infanticide as well. Just some comments for a good start to a needed article. Shyamal 10:09, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parental investment 

message: Can this Easter creation be incorporated here - Egg tossing (behavior). Does not seem to be enough there for a distinct topic/article? Shyamal (talk) 06:27, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's too specific to merge here, but an article on ovicide/infanticide and siblicide in birds would be suitable. Someone would have to create one though. The book by Hausfater and Hrdy has a chapter on the subject. Richard001 (talk) 06:24, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?

message: See http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/beta/evolution/killer-instinct.html --Espoo (talk) 12:10, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  important info 

message: Or is there a separate article for animals that deliberately destroy the fetus? It seems like it would be relevant but likely to cause problems because people might argue that abortion is not "infanticide", although the principle remains the same, and the morality of the action should have no place in a zoological article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.226.67.84 (talk) 01:01, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Would a section on abortion be relevant here? 

message: The lead image is of a group of lions.  However, they are not performing infanticide.  I think a photo of animals performing infanticide might be beyond the acceptance of most readers, however, perhaps the "Ethology" box should be the lead image.__DrChrissy (talk) 13:28, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead image is not specific
Talk:Sanctuary (Star Trek: Deep Space Nine)

message: Does it really matter which actor is related to who? Maybe on the -actor's- page.
Lots42 11:16, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The plot seems to mimic that of the Jews and Israel. A people searching for a promised land, but finding a land that is already inhabited.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 23.91.148.2 (talk) 02:52, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Israel
Talk:Empty name

message: Should be better integrated with the definite description article (which currently doesn't link to this one). AnonMoos (talk) 12:10, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

message: Lots of languages make a narrow and wide distinction in "to be," just not English, apparently.--Levalley (talk) 00:09, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two senses of "to be" 

message: My brain locked up. In what sense does Pegasus not exist??  We have a whole WP article on something that doesn't exist? There's something very fundamentally flawed with this article... it needs some major re-write. 
The entire first section, about Pegasus, Odysseus and Aristotle, is utter blarny-stone, some kind of crapola written by someone high on pot. WTF!?  This whole thing stinks of a put-on or forgery or a test to see if wikipedia is full-of-crap type experiment...  
Just to be clear: although Pegasus was never composed of physical, quantum-mechanical atoms, clearly, Pegasus exists in the noosphere, as otherwise we would not have an article on him.  The name "Pegasus" is a referent to the vast network of writing containing the word "Pegasus".  Thus, clearly, the "name" Pegasus clearly refers to something.  So is this article about:
*The meaning of the word "exist", as a theory of the quantum-mechanical assemblage of atoms at some point in time?
*Is it about the trustworthiness of archeological evidence, viz. whether we have good reason to believe that Aristotle once walked the earth?
*Is it about fraud in naming: viz the attribution of texts to Aristotle that may not have been written by him?
*Is this article about a linguistic problem of "naming things"? viz a linguistic problem of determining whether two different uses of the word "Aristotle" refer to the same historical figure, or whether one of the uses refers to my dog, named "Aristotle"?
*Is this article about a philosophical problem of "naming things", such as naming universals such as "chair", "tree", etc? 
*Is it about sense perception? I have direct, sensory experience of things that generalize to "chair", "tree" (which also "are named" but "don't exist"??)  whereas my sensory experience of Pegasus is limited to Hollywood films and children's books?  If you are Platonic, then "chair", "tree" and "Pegasus" all exist.  If you are not Platonic, but are a linguist or "knowledge engineer", then you know of the existence of texts that contain these words...
*Is it about something else?
I strongly suspect this article is about the latter option, about "something else", but the confounding factors of what it means to "exist" and to "name", means that most of this article is an un-interperable word salad of vague, undefined terms; some poetic allusion to some vague concept...  linas (talk) 16:37, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pegasus ????
Talk:Kettering

message: In the section on Early History, the following sentence appears: "About 500 BC the Iron Age was introduced into the area by a continental people in the form of the Hallstatt culture...". I don't think that's a widely-held view of archaeologists now, for 2 reasons. First, the Iron Age is held to be from 800BC onwards, and secondly, the idea of 'continental migration' is very much out of favour, as there's no evidence for it. I suggest something more like "After the social and technological changes which mark the beginning of the Iron Age around 800BC, settlement in the area seems to have increased, and a Hill Fort was constructed at Irthlingborough 16km (10 miles) away around 400BC. However there is no evidence of occupation at Kettering itself." Or, even completely removing that part and just saying (after mentioning the sparse "Palaeolithic, Mesolithic and Neolithic" finds, "There is no evidence of occupation in the immediate area in the Bronze Age or Iron Age."
Markaeologist (talk) 11:38, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beginning of Iron Age? 

message: In the Roman section: "Like most of what later became Northamptonshire, from early in the 1st century BC the Kettering area became part of the territory of the Catuvellauni, a Belgic tribe, the Northamptonshire area forming their most northerly possession".
However, in the Catuvellauni page, the tribal area doesn't extend in Northamptonshire at all. So, what's the evidence for and against the tribal area of Northamptonshire? I propose a re-write saying that it isn't known if the Kettering area was part of the Catuvellaunian or Corielatauuian area - unless someone does know, in which case I'll bow to superior knowledge. Markaeologist (talk) 12:07, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roman period 

message: I presume Hayfield Cross School did open in 2015 but I have no source for this. Can anybody provide one and make the necessary alteration?
Spinney Hill (talk) 09:15, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Education 

message: Have removed the expanding notice, this was very old + not relevant has its criteria, as been satisfied. Devokewater 16:57, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Expanding notice

message: This section needs to be moved entirely to List of people from Kettering to tidy up. Devokewater 10:09, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved everything to List of people from Kettering, eradicates dupication Devokewater 16:55, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable people

message: Sean Dyche has already been included on the List of people from Kettering, he does not need to be included on here too. Regards Devokewater 17:42, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Sean Dyche
Talk:White Bluffs, Washington

message: I am questioning the value of this line in the article: 
"Plutonium produced at Hanford was used to produce the atomic bomb dropped on Nagasaki, Japan on August 9, 1945."
This isnt really an article about the history of the Hanford works, so much as of the town of White Bluffs.  I understand that the history of White Bluffs is inextricably intertwined with the History of the Manhatten Project, but this factoid probably belongs in the main article about the Hanford works, and not here.  If there arent any objections, i will remove it.  Nothingofwater (talk) 17:39, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference to Hanford Plutonium 

message: AOL Hometown closed down, so the page indicated here isn't available.  If a replacement source is available, cool, but I don't think people will find it hard to assume on their own that the Government levelled the orchards and fields to build out these reactors on their own.  If there's no objections, it should be safe to delete. 209.180.155.14 (talk) 22:35, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:Environmental philosophy

message: I'm reviewing your article as part of the article creating process for Anthropology of Environment and Society at Mount Allison University. I think the Modern History section added a lot of important contemporary information on environmental philosophy, but it would be interesting to find out about more environmental philosophers and more dates of events in the history of environmental philosophy. I'm not sure why contemporary issues with the environment have their own section as you could just link to the main article of List of environmental issues or have them in a paragraph (or lead section) rather than bullet pointing well-known environmental issues. Also, the list of main issues in the lead section might fit better in an added section to the article. The additions seem well referenced and the content neutral. The article has been very well improved. Chaoticallyc (talk) 16:24, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Review of Additions

message: Might want to explain the picture.  Also might want to work on quotation format (if the lists are quotations). You could discuss / explain the history of this philosophy a bit more too. 
Srorourke (talk) 16:01, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: MTA Peer Review