Talk:Local-loop unbundling

message: I came to this page looking for information on a claim that I'd recently heard about the FCC reversing its position on LLU and allowing ILECs to not lease loops to competitors, and that this consequently had reduced the carriers that customers could purchase (for example) DSL service from, in some areas. I have no idea if this is true or not, but I wondered if someone could confirm or deny; the information on LLU in the U.S. in the article is a little sparse, and it would be nice to just know what the current situation and climate is like, and what direction things look like they're going in. Any volunteers? --Kadin2048 04:27, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for clarification: FCC Reversal? 

message: The purchase of AOL UK by Carphone Warehouse (CPW) for £370m has significantly changed the UK LLU market making CPW the leading LLU operator. </br>
* It should be noted that the acquisition process is not due to complete until the end of December 2006 {primarily due to EU competition authority clearance) and so it is unlikely that CPW will release much information on plans for LLU until 2007.</br>
* It has also been stated in the press that AOL UK Audience business will remain a distinct organization and brand but it is not yet clear if the AOL UK Access business (that the LLU programme is part of) will be fully integrated into CPW.
;References
:#
:#
:#
Ashley VH 22:40, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sale of AOL UK 

message: I believe that this article is incorrect, did LLU in the EU not 'officially' start on the 30th June 1987 with a green paper suggesting that telecoms should be opened to competition? 
Which I think was followed on the 28th June 1990 by 90/387/EEC and 90/388/EEC? 98dmalcolm 20:08, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Origins of LLU in the EU

message: I am quite interested in how Hong Kong has reversed it's stance on LLU. My understanding is that the Type II Interconnection policy they had in place from 1995-2004 requires service providers to negotiate interconnections between themselves on a commercial basis. And now they are withdrawing this requirement.
I guess you have to know some of the context that this legislation was introduced - apartment blocks were built, and connected by enterprising companies to their networks. With an explosion in the number of seperate networks, none of which were inter-connected, there was a problem where being connected to the network would not guarantee point-to-point interconnectivity from one building to another.
But I believe that most importantly, incumbent operators have the opportunity to extract monopoly rents, and consumers were stuck with the provider who serviced their buildings. Offering consumer choice = a good thing IMO, and preventing abuse of market power is something the public expect regulators to do.
My guess is that after 10 years or so of mandatory LLU, the industry has become so used to interconnecting and "peering" with one another that they do this as a matter of normal course of business, and even without stimulus from the industry regulator, they would do this to maintain the status quo (you peer with me, I peer with you). Izamryan 06:45, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: LLU is a necessary evil?

message: "Prices are set through a market mechanisms." Should it be "a market mechanism" or "market mechanisms"? Either way, what does it mean, if anything? Dadge (talk) 00:28, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: United States

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Local-loop unbundling. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081202153609/http://www.ictregulationtoolkit.org//en/Document.2904.pdf to http://www.ictregulationtoolkit.org/en/Document.2904.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:23, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Local-loop unbundling. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071117061320/http://www.beehive.govt.nz:80/ViewDocument.aspx?DocumentID=25636 to http://www.beehive.govt.nz/ViewDocument.aspx?DocumentID=25636
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150709014106/http://ec.europa.eu:80/competition/liberalisation/overview_en.html to http://ec.europa.eu/competition/liberalisation/overview_en.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130514034337/http://www.mlltelecom.com/what-we-do/local-loop-unbundling to http://www.mlltelecom.com/what-we-do/local-loop-unbundling
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:53, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Local-loop unbundling. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051128052756/http://www.call4change.co.nz/ to http://www.call4change.co.nz/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130217221535/http://www.broadband-reviews.com/broadband-availability/ to http://www.broadband-reviews.com/broadband-availability/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:40, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Canada's CRTC has also mandated LLU, so there should be a section detailing this.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.162.133.241 (talk) 05:48, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canada