Talk:Ozone Disco fire

message: The burial grounds of many cultures are often dressed up by folklore. Tales of 'ghostly apparitons' and 'quaking earth' make millions at the box office to this day. I think advertising the idea of alleged 'paranormal sightings' does an insult to the many, different people who lost their lives that day - most of whom could probably care less for such baseless fantasy. When is comes to human tragedy, I think Wikipedia is beyond boogeymen. Instead of contributing hocus pocus to every plane crash site, or burning building we should be looking at ourselves, not unicorns.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Douglas84 (talk • contribs) 11:22, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paranormal 

message: The coordinates need the following fixes:
* Latitude seems OK.  Longitude appears to be wrong and puts the disco in the middle of a forest in Quezon Province.  
Correct longitude should be approx. 121°02′09″ E
Tom
Tomnteena (talk) 09:31, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: — TRANSPORTERMAN (TALK) 20:01, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error 

message: There having been no response to the  tag since 5 Dec 2009 and having searched for the high-quality sources required for this exceptional claim, but not having found any, I have . Best regards, TRANSPORTERMAN (TALK) 21:00, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paranormal sightings section removed 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 03:27, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I think NOYEAR handles these sufficiently well. Many of these are sufficiently well-known that they do have that historic perspective you cite above. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 01:43, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: How was this set of articles chosen? By membership in :Category:Nightclub fires and the subcategory :Category:Nightclub fires started by pyrotechnics? Only 3 articles in those categories currently have the year. There are other nightclub fire articles that weren't nominated e.g. Coatzacoalcos nightclub fire and Rhythm Club fire, which I found in :Category:Fire disasters involving barricaded escape routes. Most of the nominated articles have the name of a particular nightclub (Denmark Place fire and Yaoundé nightclub fire are exceptions). It doesn't seem likely that fires in a nighclub with a particular name would be a recurring event (following a fire, it isn't likely that a building would be restored to a nightclub with the same name it had before the fire). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Plantdrew (talk • contribs) 03:08, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Template: Club fires, fires subcategory. Pilaz (talk) 15:51, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

text: Comment - how about including the year in parentheses AFTER the name? (I don't know if naming conventions recommend against this?) This type of info is what I think is usually tried to be included in the "Short description" field to help users disambiguate or better find what they are looking for. ---Avatar317(talk) 22:56, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: And yet your argument seems to be that, in the cases of the articles listed, one of the criteria (WP:CONSISTENT) should be prioritised over effectively all other criteria (WP:NATURALNESS, WP:RECOGNIZABILITY, WP:CONCISE)? To what end? To impart information in the titles themselves? To make the category easier to sort? Not swayed. I don't see the case for adding WP:OVERPRECISION to those titles. Mine remains a recommendation against large-scale renaming of all nightclub fire articles.... Guliolopez (talk) 23:36, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 20 October 2022