Talk:Vasectomy

message: The "Conceiving after vasectomy" describes artificial insemination as an option and later refers to in vitro fertilziation. Although both are assisted reproductive technologies, but I don't believe these terms are interchangeable.Jpberkland (talk) 09:08, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Artificial Insemination vs. In Vitro Ferilization 

message: Is there a specific reason why the right hand picture's in Brazilian Portuguese?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 177.18.42.161 (talk) 01:10, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brazilian Portuguese? 

message: Could someone put English language labels on the diagram. Thanks  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.229.216.245 (talk) 10:01, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Diagram

message: I've archived some more of the "stale" conversations on the page in the belief that this will be uncontroversial. If I'm wrong, I have no objections whatsoever to this material being restored. I would propose, once the article is unprotected and editing resumes, to archive most of the above, if everyone agrees. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:30, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It'd make sense to archive the dispute-aspect of the discussions and leave any constructive discussions regarding content as those discussions might be relevant to other editors here moving forward. That said, I'll leave it up to your skills as to what you feel should stay or go.  I noticed yesterday, that the article came available for editing again, thank you (assuming you did it:)). Dijcks | InOut  15:49, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Not I. Since I had permission, I would have done, but the protection expired just in time. :) I'll get to some archiving, then. It can be restored if I archive something prematurely. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:58, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Archived. The first archives is now pretty full, so I've gone ahead and opened archive 2, since I believe it will be used soon for the discussion above. Should I not be here, the content should just be moved to Talk:Vasectomy/Archive 2. Per Help:Archive#Cut and paste procedure, the template  should be reproduced at the bottom of the page as well, to help avoid people answering comments where they will not be seen. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:06, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Excellent, thanks again.  I hope to be able to start again with adding content that readers in particular will find useful! Dijcks | InOut  17:15, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Archiving

message: Mention if semen looks different, before and post . Jidanni (talk) 05:22, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Appearence of semen before and after operation 

message: The "Complications" section states "The risk of prostate and testicular cancer is not affected by vasectomy.[17]" However,  the "Risks" section of the Sidebar says "Moderately increased risk of prostate cancer, and more lethal form of this.[3]" I'm just a dude reading about this, so I have no idea which is correct. But it seems something should be changed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.107.75.193 (talk) 02:13, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The study cited in the sidebar received a number of published responses questioning its methodology and conclusions. I can't say that I researched this topic exhaustively, but it seems like the medical consensus is that there is no proven connection to the cancers. I'll update the article accordingly. Kane5187 (talk) 04:22, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

text: P.S. - did more research, and yeah, the one study we had cited alleging a cancer risk has been disavowed by the American Urological Association. I provided a second citation and removed all references to the idea that there's an increased cancer risk. Kane5187 (talk) 04:30, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistency re: prostate risk 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Vasectomy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160331161227/https://www.auanet.org/press-media/vasectomy-with-prostate-cancer.cfm to https://www.auanet.org/press-media/vasectomy-with-prostate-cancer.cfm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20170129050609/https://www.auanet.org/common/pdf/education/clinical-guidance/Vasectomy.pdf to https://www.auanet.org/common/pdf/education/clinical-guidance/Vasectomy.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120327213833/http://www.imccoalition.org/newsletter/2008_August_public.htm to http://www.imccoalition.org/newsletter/2008_August_public.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071206002919/http://www.earlowen.com.au/about%20vasectomy%20reversal.htm to http://www.earlowen.com.au/about%20vasectomy%20reversal.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:14, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hi, I wanted to discuss this a bit before editing willy-nilly. I think it would be very helpful to the intersex and trans people who use wikipedia and are trying to learn more about what options they have for parts of their transition. Some women have penises, and reading about a procedure for "male genetalia" is a bit distressing when you don't consider yourself male but have a penis. Thoughs? Trifyllii (talk) 19:44, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not to mention trans women whose state forces them to be sterilized before theyre eligible for medically transitioning using that state's insurance, so a trans woman trying to understand what that will mean for her and reading this article doesn't need that indication that this is for men, and having a penis makes you a man. Trifyllii (talk) 19:48, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

text: From what I remember from other discussions I've seen about this, male is used throughout Wikipedia to refer to sex rather than gender. The use of the terms men/women throughout the article is simply inaccurate though, so I will change them to terms regarding sex rather than gender.Herravondure (talk) 15:07, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

text: @Trifyllii Oh God cut the political crap. Thanks. 2.53.185.31 (talk) 20:50, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @2.53.185.31 how is it political to be thoughtful of people who are not like you? Trifyllii (talk) 00:34, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

text: Gender-neutral language does not inherently convey a particular viewpoint, political agenda or ideal. DashDashUnderscore (talk) 11:14, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-gendered language