lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Bob Elson

message: This article has been reverted by a bot to  as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) This has been done to remove User:Accotink2's contributions as they have a history of extensive copyright violation and so it is assumed that all of their major contributions are copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. VWBot (talk) 05:55, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 

message: This article has been reverted by a bot to  as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) This has been done to remove User:Accotink2's contributions as they have a history of extensive copyright violation and so it is assumed that all of their major contributions are copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. VWBot (talk) 12:59, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 
Talk:British Rail Class 98

message: The example given is poor.  Can we work out a real duplication?  46200 Princess Royal is not preserved, though 71000 Duke of Gloucester is.  46100 Royal Scot is preserved but that's only 6P/7P (not sure), not 8P.  Any other ideas? Tony May (talk) 22:27, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I maybe have an example: LMS Crab No. (4)2700, and Black Five No. (4)5000.  The black five has worked the main line, I'm not sure about the Crab.  Both are class 5 and end in 00.  But the next question then is which is the real 98500? Tony May (talk) 23:47, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I thought maybe 76079 and 80079 would fit the bill here as both should be numbered 98479 by the scheme but 76079 has the TOPS number 98476, presumably taking its cabside number's first two digits rather than the last. A better example is 60800 which should be numbered 98700 on TOPS. This number's allocated to Britannia (70000) but as 60800 has an alternative identity of 4771 it carries 98771. I also notice that LMS Compound (4)1000 and GWR 9600 should both be 98400 but the GWR loco is 98457 reflecting its history as a development of the GWR 5700 Class. None of these examples have numbers increased by one to obtain the last two TOPS digits. Maybe the section should be altered to mention these alternative numbers but this is something I worked out rather than having any other reference for it. Patrick lovell (talk) 20:36, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  real example? 

message: The list of steam locos fails to distinguish between power classification (e.g. 5MT, 8P) which is a key part of the number, and the engineering classification.  So Duchess of Sutherland for example is an LMS Coronation Class engine and power class 8P. Tony May (talk) 18:43, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Failure to distinguish between [[power classification]] and engineering classification 

message: Aren't Bittern and Royal Scot (possibly others) missing from the list? Tony May (talk) 13:00, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added Bittern from the uksteam.info website . Royal Scot hasn't got a TOPS number allocated yet, so I've left it off. —  Tivedshambo  (t/c) 21:01, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Is my memory failing me? Didn't Royal Scot run on the mainline during the 1970s though before being stuffed and mounted at Bressingham? Tony May (talk) 19:08, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Possibly - I think uksteam.info only lists locos that have run since that website was set up in c. 1996. —  Tivedshambo  (t/c) 19:20, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing
Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Hogeye

message: Should Hogeye's comments be in Section 1? I was thinking of moving them but wasn't sure of the procedure. --Tothebarricades 00:53, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC)
:I'm not sure also. How about putting them on a subheading within the "Response" section, since that's where he is supposed to write at? (He made sure to sign all them to avoid confusion, but I agree they would be better moved to a separate subsection.) --cesarb 00:59, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

message: This has been re-listed.  Does it need additional certification?  What is the status of this RfC?  Jkelly 20:38, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I reverted the relisting and created a new one. --cesarb 23:07, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: In that case it is not clear to me that User:Albamuth can certify it, as User:Albamuth was citing attempts at resolution before the block of User:Hogeye, and have not attempted any further resolution since User:Hogeye's return.  It does seem to me that this is the same dispute, interrupted by User:Hogeye's being blocked.  Jkelly 23:18, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Relisting?
Talk:Gastrovascular cavity

message: Platyhelminthes are not radially symmetrical.  This article seems to be about cnidarians, so since Platyhelminthes are equally gastrovascular, the article needs to be rewritten to reflect this. --Eric Forste 01:06, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Done, although information about the flatworms still needs to be added. Also, since gastro-vascular is an adjective, this aticle is better placed at Gastrovascular cavity or Gastrovascular system - Marshman 01:10, 6 August 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Capillary

message: I can't believe this entire article was destroyed. However, I know that people can reverse edits. I, at this time, do not know how to do this. Please someone fix this! 
:Fixed. Please see WP:REVERT for more information on doing this yourself.--Werdan7T @ 20:22, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandelism 

message: the sub-section might benefit from --Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 18:02, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: therapeutics

message: needless separation already covered on target page Iztwoz (talk) 10:37, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Sinusoid (blood vessel)]] 

message: Most if not all of the information here is covered in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capillary#Sinusoid . This page can be merged now.
SadmanTariq (talk) 18:36, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  About merging with [[Capillary]]
Talk:Maponos

message: I have pulled the following:
: Entries in the University of Wales' reconstructed Proto-Celtic lexicon (http://www.wales.ac.uk/documents/external/cawcs/pcl-moe.pdf ) suggest that the name is likely to be ultimately derived from the Proto-Celtic *Makwonos , a phrase with the Proto-Celtic semantic connotations of ‘The Youthful Lad.’
because it conveys little information. It points to a dictionary but does not say what words there have actually been used to derive the etymology. Further, the lexicon itself notes that no Gaulish material has been added to the lexicon so far.
Instead I have added a more detailed etymology, with references.
--Nantonos 17:51, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Etymology
Talk:Pluckemin, New Jersey

message: Legit redirect. Remove speedy tag. Denni☯ 01:40, 2005 Jun 21 (UTC)
Pluckemin is its own place inside Bedminster. Having the redirect discourages forming an article. --SPUI (talk) 03:57, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect discusssion
Talk:Janice Kawaye

message: Do you guys like Ms. Kawaye's voice?  I found this off a website:
Ms. Kawaye's promo Mp3--BigMac1212 03:35, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: EVERYONE has a right to edit this page. Please read WP:NPOV & WP:OWN. Thank you John Sloan (view / chat) 17:14, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Janice's Voice 

message: It's has come to my attention that a certain someone keeps undoing the photo of Janice Kawaye that Grey DeLisle Tweeted this photo of them together, & this link is proof of that fact:
:https://twitter.com/GreyDeLisle/status/864949016273891328
So until this kind of Vandalism stops, I need to know who keep doing this, cause the person goes my these wiki editor guest # accounts:
:66.112.118.126 
:66.168.28.207 
They're the same person, & are vandalizing this article without seeing the facts & the Knowledge that its really her, & that's the truth.  Norozco1 (talk) 02:47, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: It's the work of The Love Pony trying to evade its block. That user has been told many times to stop jumping to conclusions a lot. — FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 03:24, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

text: Oh I see, well that makes since. :/  Norozco1 (talk) 13:27, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Janice's Photo 

message: She also voice the Japanese mouse Miko of Capitol Critters, but it hans't been listed.2600:1700:6841:4980:10CE:1C1A:CBFC:28E1 (talk) 17:28, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing shows
Talk:That Was the Week That Was

message: The last line in this article currently reads: "ABC television in the U.S. is planning to revive That Was The Week That Was (http://abcnews.go.com/sections/primetime/Entertainment/Wanted_TW3_040702.html) for its new season of Primetime Live, beginning in September 2004."
Does anyone know if this revival actually occurred? We need to update this article. Fernando Rizo 02:01, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What is the basis of David Frost exposure/popularity in the US in the 1960's?  Presumably the famous UK BBC TW3 series were not seen by the US audience then.  How famous/successful was the 1964-65 US version of the show?  Exactly what was the role of David Frost in this version?  Is this the basis of his exposure/popularity in the US?  Where was the US version produced?  Did Frost come to the US to participate? -69.87.204.114 11:11, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  David Frost in the US 

message: The previous contributor (below) is correct. It seems there should be two separate entries for TW3. Perhaps "That Was the Week That Was (U.S.)" and "That Was The Week That Was (U.K.)."  I suggest this rather than (NBC) and (BBC) because there were at least three distinct American TW3s. Of principal interest, of course, is the NBC-TV series of 1964-65 (plus a 1963 pilot). Not as important *in its day* as its BBC namesake, but arguably more influential as a predecessor to Saturday Night Live (esp. Weekend Update segment), The Daily Show, etc. There was also a one-shot ABC special ca. 1985 starring David Frost and Anne Bancroft, and the aforementioned segment on ABC's Primetime a few years ago. 152.75.174.47 (talk) 14:22, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternate Versions 

message: This Hour Has 22 Minutes, created by Newfoundland comic Mary Walsh, has been running since
 1992...
The Wikipedia entry for This Hour Has 22 Minutes gives the year as 1993. Dick Kimball (talk) 16:57, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternate versions 

message: Why does one joke from the broadcast of Saturday 20 October 1962 get so much attention? It was hardly about an earth-shattering subject, and hasn't passed into the history of comedy? DJ Clayworth (talk) 20:28, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Saturday 20 October 1962 

message: Why "That Was the Week That Was" rather than "That Was The Week That Was" (which is how the linked BBC article is written)? -- SGBailey (talk) 12:56, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:Tishrei

message: Is there a reason that all the hebrew months are still listed as stubs? They look fairly complete to me. I know they're short, but there really isn't a lot to say about a month other than the holidays that fall in it. True but there is more like the biblical events.
Very, true.  I'll delete the stub template, becuase it is a very thourough article that deals with everything relevant.  Theonlyedge 23:13, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

message: There are many things that happened during each month of the hebrew calendar. I'm working on compiling all that happened for each day of the Hebrew month. This is what I did for the month of Tevet - Tevet#This_Month_in_Jewish_History. Bachur 03:34, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jewish History 

message: I have removed the common era dates from the entries for the sixth day of creation and first sin.  The date is not widely accepted as being accurate nor is there conclusive evidence.  To be clear I am not saying it is not true I am merely saying that because less than a majority of people/groups can agree then it should not be presented as fact in a dictionary setting.
I did not remove the in article comment about there being no evidence that the first sin happened on the same day (sixth day of creation).  At some point this statement should be harmonized with the event happening on the 1st.
[Edit, forgot to sign]
Teran Wanderer (talk) 19:21, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Common Era dates 

message: There is a to-the-point  discussion here (Cheshvan talkpage). Please take a look before adding items. You are most welcome to contribute. Thank you, Arminden (talk) 12:47, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which events belong on the list - and which don't 

message: It says civil year starts in Tishrei, which is October. Is this true? 174.242.131.146 (talk) 09:36, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'm confused about civil year starting in October?
Talk:Phuket International Airport

message: * I read in the news that 20 airlines used to serve the airport before the 2004 tsunami struck, but currently only eight do.  Does anyone have the knowledge to update the list?  Jendeyoung 02:14, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think that this article should be protected due recent acts of Vandalism.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.198.91.173 (talk) 18:29, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protect from Vandalism 

message: Somebody please clean up the destinations section, lots of irrelevant stuff there.
223.207.71.133 (talk) 14:37, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Destinations section needs a clean-up 

message: Somebody please do the clean-up! This is the most inaccurate airport article in Wiki!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 171.5.7.65 (talk) 20:48, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean-up 

message: Why have the incidents and accidents which have occurred since 16 / 09 / 2007 NOT been reported? 2403:6200:8871:9DB2:CF7:130A:3394:543F (talk) 01:41, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incidents and Accodents
Talk:Honorius of Thebes

message: Of which Thebes? Thebes, Greece, or Thebes, Egypt? –Hajor 02:16, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this is not known. All we know is that he was qualified "of Thebes" in works refering to him (Agrippa's De Occulta Philosophia 1531 and Trithemius' Polygraphia 1518) a.k.a. Thebanus. He may as well be legendary.Nyctophilia 09:28, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Honorius of Thebes
Talk:Granite

message: Quartz exists in two forms, the normal α-quartz and the high-temperature β-quartz, both of which are chiral. No mention of which kind is found in granite - the α-quartz is the more common.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.243.106.82 (talk) 20:09, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The transition from alpha to beta quartz is conformational only; no bonds are broken. As a result, the transition is never supercooled. Beta-quartz always transforms to alpha-quartz below the transition temperature, so quartz in any rock at room temperature is always alpha-quartz. I don't see a need to discuss this in this article. --Kent G. Budge (talk) 02:08, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quartz is not ONE thing - it has different forms
Talk:Boondocks (expression)

message: Of course I can't speak for others, but I landed here while searching for the real (geographical) boondocks, as well as the song.  I was wondering if there were other uses for the term that I'm not aware of, and sure enough, I'd never heard of the show and/or the strip before (I'm sort of immune to pop culture, since I don't watch much TV, etc).  Anyways, I wanted to know how the term came to to mean a completely different thing in the song than the common use in referring to a rural location?  In the song, the lyric it is stated that the boondocks is "the side of town I was born in" and not a rural location at all.  Is this a colloquialism, obscure, or obsolete usage?  Any insight?  Anyone?  Naas-T (talk) 19:51, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  How I got here
Talk:Hani people

message: I thought the capital of Yuanjiang county was Yuanjiang town. Is that true? What is Geiju? Babelfisch 02:07, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geiju 

message: The wikilinks are to languages. What should be done?
Sarcelles (talk) 10:23, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section on Subgroups 
Talk:Jino people

message: Hottentot, I don't think that they are ever spelled "Junuo". Any sources for that? Babelfisch 02:51, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: My source is from the Paul Noll Chinese Minorities page, specificially the section called Alternate Minority Spellings in China. ---Hottentot
this article needs to tell about their language and religious beliefs. Gringo300 11:56, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Junuo? 

message: Basic information to add to this article (in order that it be properly encyclopedic): a few words about the Jino language, and a mention of the term Loloish. 173.88.246.138 (talk) 23:42, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: To add to article
Talk:Piano Sonata No. 12 (Beethoven)

message: Do you think anyone could actually upload this piece of music in .mid format???  --LowLifer 02:56, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

message: The source is 'Beethoven' 2nd ed. by William Kinderman, page 100, OUP, 2009, ISBN 0–19–532825–7. If someone well-versed with wikitags can format that within the article, it'd be appreciated. - Gyan (talk) 14:28, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  On the marcia funebre 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Piano Sonata No. 1 (Beethoven) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 13:15, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Note the date of the foregoing notice. The discussion, now long closed, concerned whether to move the sonata articles to new titles incorporating opus numbers. The conclusion was not to do so. Drhoehl (talk) 23:30, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: the-sires 2A01:4C8:60:5945:1:2:D077:FE10 (talk) 03:59, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  in-place-discovery
Talk:Relvar

message: This probably needs to go to wikitictionary, as it doesn't seem to fit in wikipedia. --Apyule 03:25, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: And it can be lucky if it survives in wiktionary. It's an artificial term, coined by one person, and never *ever* used elsewhere. I'm actually only writing this because I'm annoyed that I was sent here from the Candidate key article, which is using the term 'relvar' a few times. I mean come on, even the book itself (the only place where this term is seriously used) says "we should warn you that the term relvar is not in common usage". I say this article (and the references) should go. -- Scratchy (talk) 01:55, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The term also appears in Date's Third Manifesto 69.70.21.218 (talk) 20:13, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

text: I agree with Scratchy, as I was directed here from Superkey and this article had degenerated into an article more concerned with delegitimizing the use of the term than with explaining what it was supposed to mean.  I think this article should be replaced with an article for relation variable--which currently redirects to a generic page. M. Frederick (talk) 04:14, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

text: A major problem with this article, before the changes I applied on October 3rd 2013, was that it claimed relation variable to be Codd's original term.  In fact Codd used the simple term relation to refer to variables of that ilk as well as relations. Date (and I, jointly, as it happens) decided to use "relation variable" to maintain a clear terminological distinction between the two concepts and avoid the ambiguity that had previously pervaded the literature (and, alas, still does) back in the 1990s.  And after we had written "relation variable" a few hundred times we quickly realised that an abbreviation was needed.  Actually, the term relvar has caught on to some extent, such that sometimes I even see it used when relation was the right term!
AndrewWarden (talk) 15:47, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Chris Eagles

message: Why has this been moved? I appreciate it's his full name, but Wikipedia pages rarely links to a full nam is they use a different abbreviation. See Wikipedia:Naming conventions (common names). If no-one raises any objections over the next few days, I'll move it back. HornetMike 15:36, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name move
Talk:Masaru Emoto

message: Hi guys
Sorry, I have to wonder, is there anyone behind you, or it's really the way you think? Anyway, what about a chance to just report unbiased facts, rather than personal and unfounded opinions? Humanity welcomes! Cheers!
Cmcordova (talk) 02:46, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: - see the section Masaru Emoto#Scientific criticism and the article Pseudoscience - Epinoia (talk) 02:57, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scientific facts vs personal opinions 

message: In order to be more balanced, this article should note the double blind experiment found on PubMed:
reference:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16979104/
DLPELF (talk) 17:36, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Coauthored by the subject, this may well fail wp:sps.Slatersteven (talk) 17:38, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article does not include available supporting experiment from PubMed 

message: Hello,
In reading the biased current Wiki article, I felt compelled to look elsewhere to see if Mr. Emoto's theories had been more thoroughly tested elsewhere and I found this on Pubmed:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16979104/
which somewhat supports his hypothesis. In order to present a more balanced view, it should be provided as a source, as well. 
DLPELF (talk) 17:46, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Coauthored by the subject, this may well fail wp:sps..Slatersteven (talk) 17:49, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, Wikipedia doesn't do WP:FALSEBALANCE. --Hob Gadling (talk) 18:59, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article does not include available supporting experiment from PubMed 

message: Article here dated March 2023 proves the OIUAM is still operational despite being unaccredited by the India government. 2605:59C8:6EB:C010:700B:ADEE:DFF:1638 (talk) 08:35, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: That was in march last year. Slatersteven (talk) 12:19, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article is incorrect re: OIUAM shut down