lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Wicked fairy (Sleeping Beauty)

message: The article contains too much of the plot of Sleeping Beauty, which is more suitable for that article.  This one should be on Carabosse.  Also, the princess is not always named Aurora and so it is unsuitable to refer to her as such in the text.  Goldfritha 04:40, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi and Welcome to Wikipedia Goldfritha! The whole point of starting a stub like this is than many others can add to, and improve, the page.  Your contributions will be most welcome Giano 08:44, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

text: And the whole point of discussion pages is to discuss possible changes.  Goldfritha 01:10, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I fixed a bunch of it and tried to make it clear that the references are to a couple specific versions but the outline is usually the same.  Please improve it.--Dmz5 07:03, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Subject matter

message: Having looked at both Grimm and Perrault, I found no evidence that the fairy godmother was named "Carabosse" in either story.  Does anyone have a reference before I cut out those claims?  Goldfritha 18:56, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: The princess is not "Aurora" in many versions.  Since this article is about those versions, too, it is incorrect to refer to her as Aurora in the article.  Goldfritha 18:59, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "The princess" without any introduction leaves the reader wondering. In what version where the wicked fairy is given the name Carabosse, is the princess not Aurora? --Wetman 00:53, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The article cites both Grimm, who called her "Little Briar Rose", and Perrault, who does not name the princess at all.  She's the princess in Sleeping Beauty.  Goldfritha 02:29, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And while we're at it, she is not "Aurora" in "Sun, Moon, and Talia" -- she is, in fact, "Talia."  Goldfritha 20:14, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, Perrault does name a princess "Aurora" in Sleeping Beauty, but it is not Sleeping Beauty herself, but her daughter.  Goldfritha 18:05, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Aurora

message: "Carabosse" is not a noteworthy figure apart from the figure of the "wicked fairy godmother".  The article would be better focussed if it were retitled "wicked fairy godmother".  Goldfritha 01:49, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I'm moving it.  Goldfritha 22:57, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: This character is a "fairy"; this means that she is not a "witch".--78.149.103.128 (talk) 01:11, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Species

message: This page seemed to be a mix of Sleeping Beauty and unrelated wicked fairies. I've rearranged the page, removed and tightened some things (I don't see that the Fairy Godmother in Shrek is related to this character), added some more sources, and changed the title in an effort to clarify. Sgallison (talk) 00:03, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite and Title Change
Talk:Long-toed stint

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Calidris subminuta - Pak Thale.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on February 22, 2014. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2014-02-22. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:58, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Calidris subminuta - Pak Thale.jpg]] to appear as POTD
Talk:Regularization (physics)

message: There is also Implicit Regularization  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.78.146.30 (talk) 15:49, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regularization/Renormalization techniques  

message: This article is written vaguely, as if by someone who was widely read and copying without quite understanding what they had read.  It is ridiculous to have a citation from Bertrand Russell off-topic, and the sentence "The difficulty with a realistic regularization is that so far there is none, although nothing could be destroyed by its bottom-up approach; and there is no experimental basis for it" is so ungrammatical it is incomprehensible, although a very vague impression gets across that the parson is agin' it... 64.105.137.249 (talk) 08:37, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The Bertrand Russell citation seems to be part of a quote from Salam. The citation might be off topic but the quote isn't and the citation cannot be removed from the quote without seriously altering it. I don't know about the other phrase you objected to. Dauto (talk) 15:57, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  vague inadequate article 

message: Could you please add a simpler example to this article? I landed here via n-body problem, which cites the use of regularization to handle collisions in the n=3 case. The examples here all treat quantum mechanics, whereas the mathematical situation evidently also arises in far more familiar Newtonian situations. 83.160.106.234 (talk) 14:31, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Simpler Example
Talk:Global Environment for Network Innovations

message: Wikipedia requirement for notability: "a topic is notable if it has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works, whose sources are independent of the subject itself."  
These works are linked at the bottom of the page.--Jemecki 04:43, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: But also really needs to be updated! W Nowicki (talk) 23:02, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment from 2006
Talk:Magnolia warbler

message: I wonder about the first statement, that the bird was first identified in the 1800s, because there is a drawing of the bird by William Bartram that is dated 1757. See wikimedia file at http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Magnolia_warbler_bartram.jpg  — Preceding unsigned comment added by PatriciaT (talk • contribs) 17:31, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Mangrove swallow

message: What does the bird's habitat look like? Maybe an image of the bird in its natural surroundings could be added. – Editør (talk) 09:16, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I will look into adding that. Thanks! RileyBugzYell at me | Edits 17:35, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Habitat
Talk:Renninger negative-result experiment

message: "Diffraction from the inner hemisphere is expected."  If so then it's possible that the inner hemisphere of detectors does not detect the particle, and then the wave function partially collapses to an expanding hemisphere but with diffraction effects at the edge, and they cause the particle to miss the outer hemisphere of detectors as well.  Indeed, if the outer detectors formed a complete sphere, then the particle could trigger a detector in the outer sphere that's in the shadow of the inner hemisphere, because the wave function has diffracted round the edge of the inner hemisphere.  The particle would appear to have gone straight through the inner hemisphere without triggering a detector.  Does this mean that it's impossible for the detectors to be 100% efficient? Occultations (talk) 21:47, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: In real life, detectors are never 100% efficient. Efficiency depends on both the particle type, and its energy. Last I looked, photomultiplier tubes were 30-60% efficient.  Solid-state gamma ray detectors maybe similar. Cherenkov .. dunno, for very high energies, maybe they approach 95% or better not sure. linas (talk) 05:32, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thoughts about diffraction 

message: I do not know a great deal about QM in general, but wouldn't the ability of the wave function to place a particle outside of physical boundaries make actually closing the wave function without direct observation impossible? Even supposing a perfect sensor, quantum tunneling seems to imply that a particle with an eventual trajectory that intersects with the sensor might infact not come into physical contact with it. This possibility of tunneling (regardless of how remote it is) seems to require positive-result to verify the negative-result.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.191.168.228 (talk) 16:09, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thoughts about tunneling
Talk:Marsh sandpiper

message: The pictures taken in India don't look like a Marsh Sandpiper at all, more like a Wood Sandpiper to me – although I must consider the possibility of yet another species since I'm not that familiar with non-WP waders. --Anshelm '77 (talk) 20:11, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've moved the images to Wood Sand jimfbleak (talk) 05:16, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Tringa stagnatilis 2 - Laem Pak Bia.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on November 10, 2014. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2014-11-10. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:39, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Tringa stagnatilis 2 - Laem Pak Bia.jpg]] to appear as POTD
Talk:Marsh wren

message: I’ve read that the marsh wren is a common nest predator in red-winged blackbirds’ nests. Does this mean they feed on their eggs and/or chicks or simply that they steal nesting materials from those nests to build theirs? By the way, this data could be included in the article. I could provide the references. --Pablo.ea.92 (talk) 16:43, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nest predation 

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File: will be appearing as picture of the day on April 21, 2020. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2020-04-21. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:00, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:{{Remove file prefix|Cistothorus palustris CT.jpg}}]] to appear as POTD soon
Talk:Thick-billed longspur

message: Two comments regarding the common name of this species.
1. I don't think it makes any sense not to include "Mccown's Longspur" in the lead here. This is still a name that people know the species by, and will come here looking for. Compare Long-tailed Duck and Canada Jay which still list alternate names in the lead. This seems like a no-brainer to me.
2. More debatable, but I don't think this article should refer to "Mccown's Longspur" as a "former name". First of all, this isn't really true at the moment, many sources still use this name. The current article indicates that it is reasonable to expect that other sources will change (which it is), but this is speculative and unsourced.
More importantly though, I think this is kind of a misunderstanding of what common names are. They aren't determined by organizations, they are determined by what people actually use. In the case of birds, people generally follow the organisations quite religously, but this is one example where it seems possible that some substantial fraction of people will continue stubbornly using Mccown's. And while this is IMO insensitive/immoral/[insert adjective], it isn't at all incorrect. Thoughts? Somatochlora (talk) 00:33, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: If sources still use the name then call it an alternative name. Good points. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 01:18, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Virtually all sources in print still use McCown's Longspur. Per wiki:CommonName, this article should be called McCown's Longspur with thick-billed longspur provided as an alternative name.XavierGreen (talk) 17:32, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Print sources tell us that the most common name was Mccown's prior to last year, which is not in dispute. There is good reason to think that Thick-billed is the more common name NOW, which earlier sources do not tell us anything about. Similarly, IOC and eBird, which have not changed, do not make updates on an ongoing basis and have not yet had the opportunity. The only relevant sources for this specific question are ones that have been published or updated in the past ~9 months.Somatochlora (talk) 20:17, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

text: The IOC now uses the new name. 188.148.229.11 (talk) 08:20, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name Change 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: page moved by Somatochlora. –  wbm1058 (talk) 17:48, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: McCown's longspur →  – Both IOC and Clements/eBird now use this name. Limited data but from google scholar in the past the new name is nearly universal. Somatochlora (talk) 14:32, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 12 October 2021
Talk:Representation theory of the Poincaré group

message: Spinors do not transform unitarily from one inertial frame to another. Therefore, they cannot be interpreted as wave functions. The bra ket notation used in this paragraph is misleading and should be corrected, no?
In particular,  \psi ~\mbox{and}~ \phi  cannot be identified with  \langle\psi| and |\phi\rangle Dharam Vir Ahluwalia (talk) 11:36, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paragraph beginning with "In case of spin 1/2 particles"
Talk:Reprocessed uranium

message: Be sure to check out the CANDU article and talk page. I learned some things from the talk page that I have been unable to find elsewhere. --Neilrieck 11:21, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, it is a good article... which points are particularly relevant to reprocessed uranium though? --JWB 16:35, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Montezuma quail

message: I've heard in a forum that Megapodes, Guttera guineafowl, Roul Roul, Mearn's Quail and Ithaginis Blood Pheasants are polyandrous and that the Polyplectrons' ancestors were also polyandrous. This person on the forum is Kermit Blackwood, who has done comprehensive work on gallinate birds. His research revealed that Polyplectrons, Galloperdix, and Haematortyx should be part of a distinct family of galliform birds.
But perhaps Kermit's most impressive hypothesis is about the Green Peafowl. His research revealed that the Green Peafowl is actually a complex of several distinct species. He also discovered that the Green Peafowl are also monogamous (Red Data Book says he suggested this in 2000). Peafowl are also part of their own family with the Argus "pheasants".
Much of Kermit's work would be currently labelled as citation needed or no WP:RS, due to the lack of any RS right now. However, his findings will be published in the next few years. In 2000 he showed some of his literature to the Red Data Book, which accepted his hypotheses, not including anything listed above except for the monogamous thing, those hypotheses were not even made, but all sorts of other crucial information he had by far confirmed (unusual Yunnan form of Green Peafowl, Imperial Pheasant being a hybrid).Frankyboy5 03:24, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm afraid I don't follow the ornithological literature.  I hope someone, maybe you, will add this material when it's published.  The statement about the Montezuma Quail seems to directly contradict a source I used in the article, which says that coveys typically consist only of parents and offspring, but maybe it refers to the larger coveys.  Some day this will all be straightened out.  —JerryFriedman 04:49, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Polyandrous?

message: He told me it is not true polyandry but instead a complex helper system in which males related to the alpha male help him raise his young, defend him etc. Kermit even told me that Indian Peafowl do this in the wild! Only the alpha pair breeds.
:I'm afraid I don't follow the ornithological literature.  I hope someone, maybe you, will add this material when it's published.  The statement about the Montezuma Quail seems to directly contradict a source I used in the article, which says that coveys typically consist only of parents and offspring, but maybe it refers to the larger coveys.  Some day this will all be straightened out.  —JerryFriedman 04:49, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Not true polyandry...
Talk:Mottled owl

message: Is this bird in the Strix or Ciccaba genus? There seems to be a difference of opinion within Wikipedia and elsewhere. What is its official genus?  Dger (talk) 17:06, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Genus?

message: Wouldn't it be good idea to include a picture of a male and a female to illustrate this?  Hamish59 (talk) 09:35, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it would be nice, but such a picture is not available on Commons. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:15, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: A pity, particularly as this is the hook for DYK.  Hamish59 (talk) 14:56, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Even taking a look at the cited work that indicates the difference in sizes, they make no indication of what this difference is either. I would find this assertion to be questionable without more data. 198.84.200.21 (talk) 04:21, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  sexual dimorphism
Talk:Mountain bluebird

message: Hello, editors!
I'm working on a natural history project for an undergrad UC Berkeley class. I intend to make minor changes to this article -- specifically, add some info and references I found from a variety of reputable sources. Here is the bibliography I'll pull from/the sources I'll add:
Sibley, David Allen (2016). Sibley Birds West. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf. p. 344. ISBN 978-0-307-95792-4.
Scott, Lorne (1996). "Mountain Bluebird" (PDF). Canadian Wildlife Service: 1–4 – via OskiCat.
McArthur, SL (April 2017). "Local Weather and Regional Climate Influence Breeding Dynamics of Mountain Bluebirds (Sialia Currucoides) and Tree Swallows (Tachycineta Bicolor): A 35-Year Study". Canadian Journal of Zoology. 95: 271–277 – via EBSCOhost.
Bonderud, Erica (March 2016). "Female mountain bluebirds (Sialia currucoides) paired to more colourful males produce male-biased broods". Behaviour. 153: 367–386 – via Environment Complete.
"Winter feeding habits of the mountain bluebird (Sialia currucoides) in northern New Mexico". United States Department of Energy. 2008 – via EBSCOhost.
Let me know what you think,
Annabelle  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alreadydreaming (talk • contribs) 20:23, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plans for Edits and Bibliography Additions 

message: I saw a whole flock of them at Lancaster City Park today 1/3/2020. Beautiful and completely unexpected.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.138.89.20 (talk) 23:56, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  flock seen in Lancaster CA 

message: — Assignment last updated by Jessicaphillips10 (talk) 01:16, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Environmental physiology
Talk:RF antenna ion source

message: I'm not familiar with this area/topic, but the title of the article seems like it could more appropriately be "Radio Frequency antenna ion source" or ""Radio Frequency ion source antenna." Again, I don't know the topic well, so I may be off here. The description in the intro paragraph is vague in explaining what this is and what its specific function is.Barkeep Chat | $ 18:46, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: This article really doesn't explain to the least extent the working principle of such device, and
in particular how RF is used to induce ionic emission, how, where, etc.
The link supplied also is no longer available.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.58.162.209 (talk) 22:55, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tells nothing about the subject
Talk:Ring-imaging Cherenkov detector

message: move Anthony Appleyard (talk) 09:58, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Ring imaging Čerenkov detector → Ring imaging Cherenkov detector — A more common spelling, consistent with that used in other Wikipedia articles, including Pavel Cherenkov. Goudzovski (talk) 15:10, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: In the article ALICE is referred as one of five experiments in LHC, as long as I know the experiments over the LHC ring are four (CMS, ATLAS, ALICE and LHCb).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.29.154.17 (talk) 17:16, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Experiments in LHC

message: It might be worthwhile showing two RICH types, first focussing off a curved mirror and second proximity imaging as often used in conjunction with aerogel radiators. -- KlausFoehl (talk) 17:11, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  considered images
Talk:Truck camper

message: This article needs to be worked on so it doesn't read like an advert. -Will Pittenger 04:50, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I would say this problem is partially solved.  However, I think more of the first section needs to be moved below the TOC.  That would help with readability. Will (Talk - contribs) 02:03, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Wikify tag added.  This article definitely needs some cleanup.. statements like "probably the most versatile..." and "The differences between a 1/2 ton and 3/4 ton are not so apparent"  Needs wikified as well.PWdiamond 07:52, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

message: :Add any additional comments:
 —Swpb talk contribs 18:40, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: -PWdiamond 08:46, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: I need  information and references to complete this section. If you have information, references, links or photos please send it to this special mailbox that has been set up.   E-Mail me
(this comment by  moved from article page) --Versageek 16:59, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  History of The Truck Camper - sources needed 

message: I fixed some ugly spelling errors in the quoted section from Tom Wells.  I think this is still valuable information, but maybe it should be a different linked page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.98.243.15 (talk) 21:14, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggest moving quoted article to another page
Talk:Experimental testing of time dilation

message: Was this experiment done in Echo Lake or at Mount Washington (New Hampshire) ? the sites are 2863km appart, so it doesn't seem like it was done in both, and here and here and also here says it was done in Mt. Washington. I can't seem to find where it says that it was done Echo Lake. Although I don't have access to the original paper either right now. JunCTionS 15:26, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Actual place of the experiment

message: I know this isn't too relevant, but the facts are clear. Although everywhere else it reads that it was done in 1941 it appears this is only the publishing date since as you might see on the original article the submission date is December of 1940, hence the experiment was done at most in 1940.
I believe this change requires no discussion but I leave this note here for everyone else that might have read the common error JunCTionS 14:48, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Actual date of the experiment