lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Honda Capa

message: The Capa wasn't just a concept, it's a production car.  It was sold from 1998 to 2002.  Why is it only listed as a concept from 1988 here?  The chassis codes are GA4 and GA6 (4WS).  I believe it was based upon the Honda Logo.
http://www.honda.co.jp/auto-lineup/capa/2002/
Here is the current look of the page for reference.  I'm going to edit it since I can't find any record fo a 1988 concept vehicle called the Honda Capa anyway.
The Honda Capa was a concept car developed by the car manufacturing company, Honda, in 1988, as a front wheel drive car.
Tqless 22:44, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Concept Vehicle?
Talk:WNNK-FM

message: The guy was a Howard Stern wannabe... and a very bad one, at that.  What warrants his getting his own section of the article?  My own theory is that Bond threw that in himself, the egotistical pig. 24.187.134.57 22:45, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why does Bruce Bond get his own heading? 

message: Does anyone have a means of verifying the pre-Capstar ownership?  I'm not 100% certain that it was Key Market, but I am positive that it was the same company that launched WKRZ in the 1980s. 68.83.17.105 03:20, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Verify Ownership 
Talk:Dr. Willard Van Orsdel King House

message: Rev/Mrs. Caroline KING Groshart, youngest daughter of Willard Van Orsdel King, and still living in this historic house. I still have most of Dr. King's research papers, and I can attest that the information given previously is indeed correct! For more information regarding the Mosquito-control portions of Dr. King's work, consult Gordon Patterson's book, "The Mosquito Wars".
This commentary was on the article page. Rather than deleting, I thought it might be useful to preserve the info here. --‖ Ebyabe talk - Inspector General ‖ 17:31, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved from main page
Talk:5 cm Granatwerfer 36

message: One of the external links on this page is outdated and the other refers to a modelling page? Seems to me there must be better references than that! I've deleted the second link, but would suggest improvement of this page. 
Also, very funny; The page is on granatwerfer 36, but the image says in small print granatwerfer 35. I'm not experienced enough to know which of the two references -wiki or image- is false. :-) Jobbew (talk) 09:43, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links outdated 
Talk:It's Still a Good Life

message: This article needs work, like maybe an infobox, better organization.  22:50, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Because as of the opening narration no one knew she had powers.  Fitfatfighter (talk) 07:11, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Anybody noticed it contradicts the plot? Audrey possesed her father's powers. GoodDay (talk) 16:48, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks as if this question was addressed just above. -Phoenixrod (talk) 05:02, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening narration 
Talk:160 mm Mortar M1943

message: There seems to be a mix-up of users of M1943 160mm mortar users, in particular India and Finland neither of which appear to have used Soviet 160mm mortars. India used 160mm Finnish Tampella mortar, apparently bought from Israel, reference 14 about India even specifically mentions this, and photos of Indian 160mm mortars show Finnish Tampella mortars (not Israeli Soltam M66). Finland also used the Tampella mortar, but made in Finland, as far as I know the Finns never used any other.
The references to Jane's Infantry Weapons 2001-2002 are now dead links so cannot be checked.
I suggest that India and Finland be removed from the list of M1943 users unless newer sources can be found that they did use them as available evidence suggests they didn’t. 151.177.73.209 (talk) 10:48, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mix-up of 160mm mortar users?
Talk:Third Army (Ottoman Empire)

message: The redirect Third Army(Ottoman Empire) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Steel1943 (talk) 07:10, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Third Army(Ottoman Empire)]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:2B9 Vasilek

message: 4500 of them was built in hungary ("Magyar autógyárak katonai járművei" - Dr. Bárdos András ISBN: 9639005959)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 160.114.153.181 (talk) 12:54, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: This link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fT50bMnbnPw
It's listed here as proving milita use in Donbass, but there is no 2B9 in the video anywhere. Early on there is an AGS-30 30mm grenade launcher, but no 2B9. I susgest it be removed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.68.78.192 (talk) 22:43, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  War in Donbass 

message: Vasilek is incorrect. ё is russian alphabet yo. 88.115.136.141 (talk) 10:54, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vasilyok
Talk:M2 mortar

message: Image removed.  The mortar shown was *NOT* a US M2 60mm mortar.  Even a cursory comparison would reveal major differences in the bipod configuration, it lacks the T&E mechanism of the US M2, the tube is quite different, and the breech cap is completely unlike that of the US M2.  The baseplate was also completely unlike that of the US M2.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.130.1.193 (talk) 01:31, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Image removed

message: move all Anthony Appleyard (talk) 16:07, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: M2 Mortar → M2 mortar — per concensus at user:user name one/Capitalization username 1 (talk) 02:34, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: I suspect this is a case of mistaken identity for the M2 4.2 inch mortar (which was a chemical weapons project), especially since this M2 mortar didn't fire any chemical munitions.  Unless anyone has a good reason for this I suspect the "U.S. infantry weapons of World War II and Korea" directory would be a better fit. 62.196.17.197 (talk) 08:40, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does anyone know why we have a big directory box to the "United States Chemical Weapons Programme" at the bottom of the page?
Talk:Lester S. Moore

message: I believe Lester S. Moore was part of the firm Blick and Moore before he worked on his own.  If you know of any reference material that discusses his association with Blick, please send me a message.  Thank you. MissionInn.Jim (talk) 20:30, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blick and Moore 
Talk:Decoration Day (film)

message: I actually remember seeing this movie on TV back then, and I would not even summarize the film such as this is. This could be any film, really, except for the two basic facts presented. The rest is glib filler (the character finds out something he doesn't know, etc) and appears to be trying to avoid "spoilers" which isn't the point of the plot sections of any movie on Wikipedia. 
The crucial discovery is the memory that an "American" platoon leader asked the character if he had "made all this", which was the clue (because "to do" or "to make" are different verbs in English, but the same in most European languages including German) that it was actually a subversive German special forces unit disguised to appear as Americans who had then shot him with a submachine gun. THIS needs to appear in the plot. Deliusfan (talk) 02:27, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot needs, well, a plot
Talk:National Institute for Certification in Engineering Technologies

message: I've just wikified this page as part of WikiProject Wikify - added tags, logo, introduction - but something just doesn't quite feel right about the POV. I may be wrong so don't be offended - but if anybody knows this area I'd appreciate you input. Madmedea 23:04, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been 4 months since a POV tag was added.  Is there still a dispute?  If not the tag will be removed. ndyguy 22:09, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV tag
Template talk:Governors of New Mexico

message: Intended for use on biographical articles about the governors of New Mexico.  Territorial and state governors are listed here.  King and a few others are repeated in the list, but that's an effort to keep the chronology correct.  See List of governors of New Mexico for the same list, with complete names.  --ABQCat 03:02, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Adaptive replacement cache

message: I kept encountering references to the "ARC" in the opensolaris zfs discussion.
This article needs more work, but I just want a place where I can find this bit of background.
I have yet to read the papers (link in the parent article), so I'm not yet quoting any claims about
the workings of the algorithm.  Maybe later this week.  Henk Langeveld 23:12, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: More work

message: Is it "Adaptive replacement cache" or "Adaptive Replacement Cache"? This article is inconsistent. --Mortense (talk) 18:00, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Adaptive replacement cache" or "Adaptive Replacement Cache" 

message: at the very bottom about VMware? Gisforgirard (talk) 18:39, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  is Caching Algorithm really a proper noun? 

message: L2ARC currently redirects to an article that, alas, never mentions L2ARC.
Should L2ARC instead redirect to the OpenZFS article or this adaptive replacement cache article, which at least mentions L2ARC?
--DavidCary (talk) 03:40, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  L2ARC 

message: This article mentions improved performance compared to the common Least Recently Used method, but doesn't go into any kind of comparison the performance. What are the advantages (and any disadvantages)? What are the best and worst case scenarios like? Probably better written by someone who's more familiar with ARC than I am (all I know is that the ARC in OpenZFS works extremely well). -- Haravikk (talk) 20:08, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  ARC Performance 

message: L'ordinateur cache une bombe dont les coordonnées sont Des entiers compris entre 0 et 100 inclus le joueur propose un point. si la distance entre la bombe et le point proposé est  inférieure ou égale à 10, le programme affiche "bravo", sinon le joueur doit proposer à nouveau un point. Le nombre d'essais est limite à 5 102.158.134.115 (talk) 17:36, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Idk
Talk:Johan van Stratum

message: Johan and Marcela separated amicably in 2018. 
There are no sources I can find that covered these 2 niche artists' personal life, and some furry auto-reverts my edit if I try to add the correct information. 
Maybe I will delete the entire section instead. 217.103.10.138 (talk) 19:09, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Me being a furry makes me no different from any other editor. I'm assuming good faith here in that you did not mean that as a personal attack, but please remember to comment on content, not contributors. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 19:35, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Rest assured, this little spat of ours probably cured me from investing time & effort in this site for years to come. 217.103.10.138 (talk) 19:43, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  3O Response: I came here from WP:3O and have no connection with the article's subject or either of the editors, I am commenting here as a neutral third-party. From what I see the issue is the addition of unsourced content such as this. Per Wikipedia's policy on verifiability, we do need to be able to verify that the information is true through a reliable source, and if one cannot be provided the content can be removed. This is especially true for content on biographies of living people such as this article. 217.103.10.138, if you can provide a reliable source that can verify that  is true, then that solves the issue completely and the information can likely stay in the article. That being said, that entire "Personal life" section is unsourced, which is a problem, so the IP is not wrong in removing unsourced content in this edit. I think if content being added to that section can be done with an attached reliable source, that can resolve this without further issue. I hope this helps. Aoidh (talk) 02:31, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Divorce
Talk:Remote collision

message: In my opinion the article describes the remote collision correctly but it essentially describes an effect, not the cause of the remote collision.
In fact, the term "remote collision" comes from times when repeaters (and hubs) were used on networks. If a collision occured on one segment connected to the repeater, the collision fragment together with the jam signal was transmitted by the repeater to the other segment. The collision was local at the segment where it occured in the first place, and remote at the other segment where it was propagated by the repeater.
The local and the remote collision are similar in that the collision fragment appears as a frame that is shorter than the minimum size and whose FCS is incorrect. The most notable difference between local and remote collision is that local collision violates the coding scheme while the remote collision does not. The signal on the cable may experience illegal levels (and perhaps timing) due to superposition of the signals coming from colliding NICs. However, these illegal signal levels will not get transmitted through the repeater - as the repeater regenerates the signal itself, it can never generate something that violates the coding scheme. Therefore, the remote collision indeed appears as a frame fragment that is shorter than minimum frame size, has an incorrect FCS but that does not violate the coding scheme.
This is what I have known about it - if there is anybody knowing better please let us all know. Paluchpeter 23:24, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The origin of the name "remote"
Talk:9.5×57mm Mannlicher–Schönauer

message: Quote: The word Schoenauer is often spelled Schönauer with an “umlaut” over the “o”
The whole letter "ö" is the "Umlaut", not only the dots on top, which are a symbol for an additional letter "e". The correct transcription for an "ö" is "oe", if no "Umlaut" is available: Mannlicher Schoenauer   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:8108:8B40:638:B43F:8C8F:85C1:1DFD (talk) 07:52, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Umlaut 

message: The classic African game round has a solid jacket.  I bought a Mannlicher 1910 rifle of this calibre in Zimbabwe, and saw two other such rifles there.  The ammunition for them was old Kynoch manufactured packets of 20.  I got three packets with the rifle, consisting of mixed soft point and fully jacketed.
I do not have access to references on the history of the round, but for Africa I believe the reference to hollow point may be mistaken. ChrisPer 05:00, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hollow-point??? 

message: Not sure about this, but I quess the cartridge was created by the steyr arms factory especially for the M1910, as they did with the 6,5x54MS / M1900/M1903, 9x56MS / M1905, 8x56MS / M1908, and finally the 9,5x57MS. I think when the M1910 got popular in Africa quite soon british ammmo-makers, having a huge market there, started producing it. They did the same with the 6,5x54 and called it .256 Gibbs, while the 8mm and 9mm versions never made it outside of continental Europe. I bought old Kynoch ammo with my rifle, and it´s marked 9,5mm Mannlicher Schoenauer, never saw a cartridge or a rifle marked .375 rimmless N.E., although the name is mentioned in every literature about the 9,5x57. Peter 92.248.110.7 (talk) 03:48, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: British sporting retailers imported the Mannlichers for sale to their customers, and on import they were all required to be submitted for British proof. The barrels were then stamped .375 R.N.E. at the proof house using hand stamps. ChrisPer (talk) 07:37, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin?
Talk:Attraction

message: Is Metaphisics deliberately misspelled? Bo-Lingua 00:37, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Typo

message: The French Wikipedia have an entry about a company in Quebec, Canada named Attraction (entreprise) and I wondered if it's possible to post an English version of it? Sd-100 (talk) 21:31, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attraction (business, entreprise)
Talk:Büsum

message: I saw that the page originally gave the distance to Heide as approximately 18 kilometers and this was changed to 20. Actually, it used to be 20, but since the road between Büsum and Heide has been rebuilt to bypass Wöhrden, the driving distance has indeed been reduced from 20 kilometers to 18 (confirmed using MapQuest). Therefore, I'm changing it back to 18. - tameeria 23:40, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hi all, I've tried to add an interwiki link to wikisource for Klaus Groth's poem Ol Büsum. The page exists at wikisource.org (). However, when I link to it using the interwiki linking, it redirects to en.wikisource.org, where the page does not exist and therefore the link ends up broken. Is there any way to fix this? - tameeria 21:08, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikisource linking? 
Category talk:Goldfish breeds

message: Note to editors. I created this  as a subcategory of  to be consistent with other pet animal categories, just as poodle belongs to  rather than  or British Shorthair belongs to  rather than . However, after moving the goldfish breed articles into this category, the  is left with no articles other than goldfish itself. Personally, I doubt that there will be any new non-breed goldfish articles in the near future. But since I am not an admin and can't delete pages, I left it just the way it is. If you are an admin and would like clean up the categories, I'd suggest deleting the  and move up this  to be directly under  in replacing of the . --Melanochromis 23:41, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  {{cl|Goldfish breeds}} vs {{cl|Goldfish}}
Talk:Felix de Andreis

message: https://archive.org/details/lifeofveryrevfel0000rosa/page/n9/mode/2up
will begin to incorporate this content if/when I get the chance, but other editors should feel free too. 
Maximilian775 (talk) 17:03, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Public Domain Biography of de Andreis
Talk:Deserts of Australia

message: The Pinnacles Desert; shouldn't be added? 89.211.185.69 (talk) 20:06, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Painted Desert, Little Sahara (Kangaroo Island), Sandy Desert Nat. Park near to Victoria (not a real desert, but arid climate)? Btw. the area of the Great Victoria Desert in the table is diff. from the article. RIMOLA (talk) 23:45, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Pinnacles Desert 

message: Is not entirely a  desert - unless there might be an authoritative WP:RS that says otherwise SatuSuro 08:40, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nullarbor plain 

message: I tagged this one for discussion, as it doesn't seem to be  a common name (per Google) and/or is poorly-defined: eg, the Central Desert Shire is in NT, and there's an old reference to a Great Central Desert in south central Australia, apparently now called the Tirari Desert in SA (Lake Eyre area. ???? --Pete Tillman (talk) 19:46, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Central Desert"?? 

message: I just looked up "bunyip" and "drop bear" through Google... looks like someone is having a bit of fun here, as these are mythical creatures, like a jackalope or Bigfoot. That should probably be edited. 108.66.122.193 (talk) 18:05, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: bunyip

message: In , the following para needs clean-up:
A large contiguous desert area is formed by the Tanami, Greater Sands, Lesser Sands, Gibson and Greater Victoria Sands in western Australia and a smaller one by the Simpson, Sturt, Strzelecki and Tirari Deserts in the east. Spatially isolated between Great Victoria Sand and Simpson lies the small Pedirka Desert, which spreads out over the geological Pedirka Sedimentary Basin. The Small Sandy Desert connects to the Great Sandy Desert and is similar in terms of landscape and vegetation. The Western Desert, which describes a cultural region of Australia's indigenous people, includes the Gibson, Great Victoria, Great Sand and Small Sand deserts in the states of Northern Territory, South Australia and Western Australia.
Most of the ...
 yoyo (talk) 09:21, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy-edit needed
Talk:Strzelecki Desert

message: According to the map of Australian deserts the Strzelecki Desert is positioned south of the Tirari Desert which is wholly contained in South Australia. Therefore the Strzelecki Desert cannot be part of Queensland. Birdsville, Queensland is on the edge of the Simpson Desert not the Strzelecki. - Shiftchange (talk) 03:13, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not in Queensland
Talk:Painted Desert (South Australia)

message: Is this a real desert (sources) or just hills: are the Anna Creek Painted Hills a part of the Painted Desert? Any information about the size/area (300 sqm)? RIMOLA (talk) 23:08, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Desert or mountains/hills? 

message: The usage and primary topic of  is under discussion, see talk:Painted Desert (Arizona) -- 70.51.44.60 (talk) 10:11, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: "Painted Desert"
Talk:Antiochene Rite

message: This article could be greatly improved by including pictures of the liturgy. Dgf32 (talk) 05:08, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: As it is not one extant liturgy, but the common ancestor of a family of liturgies that have been modified extensively throughout the centuries, there's no way to get a photograph of the single Antiochian Rite liturgy. Showing only one of the successors would create balance issues. As such, I have rremoved the photo request. It just can't be done properly. oknazevad (talk) 20:48, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Photographs needed
Talk:Battle of Tobruk (1911)

message: In English:
*"Battle of Tobruk" Mustafa-Kemal -Llc 2, both of them are Turkish book written in English language. 
*+ Kemal "Battaglia di Tobruk" -Llc 0
In Turkish:
*Mustafa Kemal "Tobruk Muharebesi" -Llc 4
*Mustafa Kemal "Tobruk Savaşı" -Llc (1)
Takabeg (talk) 05:26, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable ?
Talk:Trenton Six

message: This was wrongly wrote they were all innocent 86.31.80.36 (talk) 19:28, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Racism
Talk:HIV superinfection

message: I believe this article could stand to be expanded since its on a very important topic and it has much more that needs to be said and I think many people are interested in knowing more about it.qrc2006/email 23:58, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion

message: Recapitalized HIV Superinfection which is a single word and a proper noun. HIV Superinfection is a particularization, its not just any superinfection its "'HIV' Superinfection."qrc2006/email 00:03, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Move

message: The article says "there have been 16 documented cases of superinfection since 2002," then goes on to say "super-infection is common".
Given that the world population is 7.5 billion, 16 cases since 2002 seems far from "common," making this a glaring contradiction in the article. 75.163.140.80 (talk) 04:15, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Common?
Talk:Stream of Passion

message: Added a POV tag to the first section because of the clear bias in the section. The section as it is clearly attempts to favor the position of the band. --V2Blast 19:28, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias 

message: In the Stream of Passion article, it states that the song, "out in the real world" is the bands album "Embrace the Storm"'s only single, when truthfully, the song "Passion" was also released as a single from the album "Embrace the Storm".  I would appreciate it very much if someone would give the single "Passion" a little credit... Thank You
Coheedlover (talk) 20:31, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  There is and error in the Stream of Passion article 