lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:John R.F. Jeffreys

message: I've adjusted the category on this page for DoB - since 'early 1941' is established. For DoB, there are few candidates born, say, after 1900. Probably the best candidate is:
John R. F. Jeffreys born MAR 1916 3a 778 BARNET - John [R_] F JEFFREYS, mmn = Saunders
Can anyone confirm this or best still find a reference? Thanks, Ian Cairns (talk) 01:38, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of Birth
Talk:Eden's Crush

message: How come there is no picture of eden's crush
Icevirgo99 01:25, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: now it is.--Zingostar 16:08, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What happened!!

message: The article mentions that Eden's Crush "featured a multicultural membership of Dominican, Puerto Rican, Russian, Filipino, Hawaiian, Irish, German, and Colombian descent."  This is not only irrelevant (as it shouldn't matter what the ethnicities of the members of the group are, unless that was part of their appeal, in which case that should be stated) but also very misleading, considering Scherzinger is Filipina-Hawaiian-Russian.  It is racist to assume that because an individual is of a given ethnicity that her ethnicity will be represented in her music.  It very well may be, but nothing in this article indicates that.  If that is the case, there needs to be a section discussing how the group's multicultural makeup influenced the music.  Otherwise, it is mere fetishism.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sincizzil (talk • contribs) 23:34, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  multicultural ambiguities
Talk:Gods of Riverworld

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  VernoWhitney (talk) 12:35, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Frances Gifford

message: I added it originally based on a website claim (1st para.). Anon reverted the claim with the edit summary Frances Gifford was not related to Frank Gifford. Frank Gifford's biography (The Whole Ten Yards) lists an older sister Winona. There is no reference to Frances.
I do not take a position one way or another but it would be useful if someone else could confirm the anon editors information. —Moondyne 03:39, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sister of [[Frank Gifford]]?

message: The statement that has put Gifford in the American librarians and American women librarians categories seems to be "In 1983, Richard S. Fisher, a journalist for a film magazine, tracked Gifford down, who had lately been volunteering at the Pasadena, California, City Library, having apparently recovered." I know who counts as a librarian has some controversy, but the sentence and citation are vague enough that I'm not sure she can be classed as a librarian because of this? -- NotCharizard 🗨 01:34, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Librarian category
Talk:St. Ides

message: Beware the Ides of Malt...  Afalbrig 23:01, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: St. Ides is now a cannabis brand. They do not produce malt liquor in any capacity. See their website, which no longer lists any alcohol, only marijuana, and this Adweek article, the subheader of which mentions Pabst "relaunching St. Ides malt liquor as a potent, socially active cannabis line." Anotherage (talk) 03:17, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article needs full rewrite
Talk:French Frigate Shoals

message: This article needs a locator showing the position of the territory in the world. -- Beland 01:06, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oahu, Maui, and Molokai don't have maps showing their relationship to the other islands, do they? They do actually, and the individual NW islands would probably benefit from a map showing where they are in Hawaii as well (I think showing where they are in the world is probably unnecessary though) - fortunately :Image:Hawaiianislandchain USGS.png already exists and I don't see anything wrong with putting a copy in each article.  Kmusser 17:59, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Locator map 

message: They just read as long lists, and that's it. Most of the listed coral species either don't have links or are redlinked, while the birds are already mentioned and listed off in "Geology and ecology" (which I merged the two sections with in my first edit), with links and everything.
I removed the bird list, but I'm keeping the coral list because its information isn't listed in prose already; regardless, I put a prose template above it. AdoTang (talk) 18:25, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are the coral and nesting bird lists necessary?
Talk:Cape Colony

message: This infobox should be replaced by  Valentinian (talk) / (contribs) 03:43, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox update

message: Hi folks.  I've added this article to the SouthAfrica state template, and the template to the article.  If I've committed a major faux pas in doing so, please accept my apologies. Tevildo (talk) 15:32, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  SouthAfrica state template 

message: Since the British Empire was ruled by a King at the time, shouldn't the anthem read God Save the King?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Emil Kastberg (talk • contribs) 20:19, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yepp! Bingo. Seb az86556 (talk) 20:25, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  God Save the ''Queen?'' 

message: I think this article should either split into Dutch Cape Colony and British Cape Colony, or the infobox has to be quite different. The article itself is now about both the Dutch and British period, but the infobox is only about the British period. Fentener van Vlissingen (talk) 19:50, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Nobody has a comment? Fentener van Vlissingen (talk) 11:05, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I have been WP:BOLD. Fentener van Vlissingen (talk) 10:40, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox does not match the article 

message: This stub should be merged into the dis-ambiguous class-c article and a redirect should be created. Technical 13 (talk) 15:08, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: And what about Dutch Cape Colony, then? - htonl (talk) 15:22, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  The whole idea of creating separate articles by sticking the words "British", "Dutch", &c., at the front is almost certainly an ungrammatical "fad" (fashion)—nay "meme"—started by Anglophile Hongkong Chinese and Japanophile Taiwanese Wikipedians for revisionist political reasons, with no other known major example—as far as I am aware of—in Wikipedia without. --- 212.50.182.151 (talk) 11:37, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with "[[Cape Colony]]" 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: No consensus to move, majority of editors see it as the primary topic   (t · c) buidhe 21:07, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Cape Colony →  – The Cape Colony was not only ruled by the British. The Dutch have also ruled it before and it has a page called Dutch Cape Colony so therefore the page of Cape Colony which is ruled by the British should have its name moved to British Cape Colony. D4rkeRR9 (talk) 20:36, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  Did you just call it "British Cape Colony"? Walrasiad (talk) 03:43, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, they were disambiguating in context. The article has a hatnote for the same purpose. CMD (talk) 04:06, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 29 December 2020
Talk:Colombian Americans

message: For dedicated editors of this page: The "Related Groups" info was removed from all  infoboxes. Comments may be left here. Ling.Nut 23:03, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "related groups" info removed from infobox

message: Please consider contributing to the article entitled History of Latinos and Hispanics. Thank you! --JuanMuslim  1m 02:02, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: History of Latinos and Hispanics

message: I've added Jaime Manrique to the list of notable Colombian Americans given the large number of novels and other books he has published, which are of extremely high quality and have come out with leading commercial and university presses. Please consider helping to expand entry on Manrique, which is a stub.--Mgdelarosa (talk) 20:50, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Jaime Manrique]]

message: There has been spate of rollbacks by User:RichardWeiss to the articles , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , and .
These have been undone, since:
* the editor failed to provide any rationale
* the editor deleted sourced content
If you wish to engage in constructive behavior (e.g. questioning the validity of sources), a good place to start would be on the talk pages of the respective articles. Resorting to random drive-by reverts is generally considered unhelpful. Thanks.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.252.4.106 (talk) 11:50, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The same highly controversial paragraph has been spammed into 16 different articles. I don't consider the encyclopedia.com source reliable, the article dabs are very poor and the whole paragraph bordering on racist. ♫ RichardWeiss talk contribs 15:36, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Unexplained removal of sourced content

message: This article claims to list the top 10 states by Colombian population, then proceeds to list all 50 states alphabetically.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.125.148.30 (talk) 12:26, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Top 10
Talk:Kure Atoll

message: The article includes an image of Green Island from an airplane. Compared to the satellite view of the atoll, this island has the correct shape, but the runway shown in the satellite is not seen in the airplane view. Google's satellite view of Green Island also shows the runway. So, is this image of "Green Island" incorrectly labeled? KarlWK (talk) 05:10, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures 
Talk:Guglielmo Oberdan

message: Terrorism is a modern term, I don't think it can be used for Oberdan. Moreover, I think that definition is a little controversial, and probably biased: as concerns Wikipedia, I've found that definition only in the Slovene edition and here (by a Slovene contributor, by the way). And that's the first time I read Oberdan is a terrorist, and not simply an irredentist, related to the complicated and bloody history of the Italian unification. CorradoM (talk) 01:16, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Terrorist?
Category talk:Lists of scientists

message: Should the page titles for this entire category be changed to  "List of notable chemists [etc].
It makes the purpose clearer , and differentiates them from category, which is simple and automatically all the chemists who happen to have actual pages here.?
List of notable... is used for many other similar purposes. I suppose we in science can be distinctive and use ours the way it is, but it would be useful to have it said explicitly.DGG 03:59, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lion Country Safari

message: Shouldn't this be linked to defunct amusement parks? Ucrfl 19:18, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The park is still open.  Eli lilly 22:10, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Defunct?

message: Why was I redirected here from "Bubbles the Hippo" when the article does not mention her? She escaped from Lion Country Safari, enjoyed 19 days of freedom, mostly submerged in a pond, then was tranquilized with two darts (one being insufficiently effective), then died, 5 months pregnant, after being given yet another sedative. Nothing about her here. It would seem appropriate for her to be mentioned, but she isn't. WordwizardW (talk) 23:54, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: A user created the redirect in 2007. As that user hasn't edited Wikipedia since 2017, we probably can't ask them why they created the redirect but didn't add the story of Bubbles to the article. If you wish to, you can add the story of Bubbles to the article yourself. One source is here. - Donald Albury 00:11, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! WordwizardW (talk) 13:50, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why was I redirected from "Bubbles the Hippo" when the article does not mention her?
Talk:Neva Shoals

message: To prevent a future confusion, I'd like to state why Neva Shoals is in the :Category:Northwestern Hawaiian Islands but not listed on the page Northwestern Hawaiian Islands and not in Template:NWHawaiianIslands. Neva Shoals is technically a reef directly offshore of Lisianski Island, but not an island or atoll, which is why it is not listed in the template. Later, if we add a section to Northwestern Hawaiian Islands on reefs and banks, we can list it under that (same goes for the template). As to why it is listed under the category: while it is not a Northwestern Hawaiian Island, it is in the chain and needs a specific category to be in without the category being too specific (don't make a category called "Reefs and Banks of the NWHI"). 
For those who think I am analyzing this way too much, I kind of agree and I don't much like semantics, but that's the reason. If you disagree, please say so. SeanMD80talk | contribs 19:38, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discrepency
Talk:Villard Hall

message: Pictures from the Historic American Buildings Survey can be found at this link, along with data pages about the structure and its history.  I'd add them, except it's way too late at night right now.  --Elkman - (Elkspeak) 07:58, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Awesome, thanks for the tip! I'll check it out tomorrow as I should get to bed too... Katr67 08:04, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not very good with image copyright stuff--which tag do you use with these? Katr67 06:12, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I added one of the HABS pics. I just followed the copyright format of this photo. Do you think it could still use a contemporary photo? Power piglet 08:07, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Rotations and reflections in two dimensions

message: This assumes that the reflection is over the direct center of the shape. What about if the line has an offset?
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.179.121.2 (talk • contribs) 04:06, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What shape? —Tamfang (talk) 19:18, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: ancient question

message: Having this (short and mediocre) article be separate doesn't really seem particularly valuable to me. –jacobolus (t) 08:22, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can this just be merged to [[Euclidean plane isometry]]?
Template talk:Reporting marks

message: Template: has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you.
Do we really need this one along with Template:Reporting mark?  The only difference appears to be an 's', which could possibly be added to the other one.  Jason McHuff 04:06, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  TfD nomination of Template:{{ucfirst:Reporting marks }}
Talk:Sugar plum

message: i thought the nutcracker-variety were sort of stewed plums, caramel dipped, not just oval shaped sugar.
Justforasecond (talk) 01:53, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  sugar plums? 

message: So it seems there are two different things called 'sugar plum'. What about having an article for each?
11:24, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Candy vs fruit?? 

message: I read an interesting article (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/13/sugar-plums_n_2272029.html) that said the original sugar plum has no fruit in it at all, but is a sugar based candy with nuts (or pieces of nuts), in it.  However I cannot source the article (considering where it is) so I'm not including this in the main article.  I'll research this a bit more and if I find a source-able article, I'll add it then.  But if anyone can do so, please add this to the main article. 
If I'm wrong about being able to cite a Huffington Post as a source, then please feel free to add this to the main article.
OTOH, the comments section in the above article is also interesting. 98.203.248.103 (talk) 15:27, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sugar plum has no plum in it!
Talk:List of planet–satellite systems

message: What is the point of having the surface area of these systems (minus the gaseous planets) listed on here. It is an interesting fact though that the earth-moon system has the most area out of all the systems.--Sethhater123 04:08, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And even if you take Earth alone it will have the most area.--Planemo 10:57, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Surface area

message: Should these small (40 meter to 500 meter) bodies be included in the count of moons? the main article for Saturn lists it as having 60 confirmed moons as well as mentioning separately that it has ~150 moonlets which I don't believe is an official classification. Should we have this article stating this number (200) when most people will only consider moons to be the larger bodies moons?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.173.179.113 (talk) 03:17, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: They're satellites. No one said anything about moons. "Moon" is undefined by the IAU, but a lot of people think Jupiter has four moons, because 1-km chunks of ice don't count. And since every particle in Saturn's rings is a satellite, we of course need to specify the number of known satellites. kwami (talk) 05:56, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

text: Sure, if you like. But if you're going to count moons, you need to define what that means for the purposes of this article, and justify which count you choose. kwami (talk) 06:58, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  moonlets 

message: Merged into natural satellite. This list just duplicates the nav box, and included several systems which were not planetary. If we're going to include minor planets, as we were, we'd need to expand the list a hundred. — kwami (talk) 23:20, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  merged
Talk:List of ideologies named after people

message: I see that the words: arianism, Bahai, Buddhism, Calvinism, christianity are in this list.
Whereas I might defend the use both on the grounds that a religion can be considered an ideology, and that they imply, perhaps some would challenge them on the basis that they are perceived as religions, rather than ideologies. Perhaps some line of reason on why these are included might be in order? Or perhaps a more comprehensive title so that they might not be challenged? DanielDemaret (talk) 03:47, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Religions 

message: I removed Stalinism cause it's not an ideology. --130.243.148.247 (talk) 09:50, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stalinism 

message: I removed the "scientific" section. There is no such thing as "scientific ideologies". Either the main title should be changed (maybe 'systems' instead of 'ideology') or the page should be splittet with appropriate titles. Otherwise it is very misleading.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.72.152.157 (talk) 01:24, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Ideology is not the first thing that comes to people's minds when they hear the word science, right. But science, like other organised human activities, necessarily starts with selecting (sets of) ideas. And where there are different idea packages, there are ideologies. See also Ideology#Epistemological_ideologies. While so disagreeing with the claim that there are no scientific ideologies, I think you do have a point about the title. Others make likewise objections for other -isms listed here, so it seems there's a wider problem with the word 'ideologies'. 'Systems' would be a fine candidate. 'Movements' might also stir less controversy than the current title. Apdency (talk) 11:00, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scientific
Talk:David Ball (wide receiver)

message: It was requested that this article be renamed but the procedure outlined at WP:RM#Steps for requesting a controversial page move did not appear to be followed, and consensus could not be determined. Please request a move again with proper procedure if there is still a desire for the page to be moved. Thank you for your time! -- tariqabjotu 04:20, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lisa Kelly

message: Lisakelly.org IS Kelly's official website. It was launched in Feb 2007 but was hacked in Mar 2007 and has been down since. For the time being her old site will have to suffice but .org is official. Sharpvisuals 05:29, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, all I know is that the CelticWoman.com site links to the .com website, so for the time being, lets leave it as that.  There's no reason to link to a dead website. -- Huntster T • @ • C 07:41, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official website 

message: Lisa Kelly is her birth name, not Laoise Ní Cheallaigh. That is only the Irish Gaelic translation and since only a small percentage of Ireland are native Gaelic speakers, her name is Lisa Kelly.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.23.77.202 (talk) 02:16, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, you've raised an opposition and voiced some good points. All parties, please back away. Unless a citation can be provided for the Irish name being her birth name, let's leave it out of the infobox. Thanks. — Huntster (t • @ • c) 02:42, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth Name 