lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Poplin

message: You can rotate things, and I think "vertical warp and horizontal weft" is just describing what "warp" and "weft" usually mean when describing a loom. What is that qualifier even supposed to be distinguishing poplin from? Are we just saying it's woven, and has two possibly-distinct types of fiber in it, or are we actually claiming that the warp is specifically "vertical" and this is somehow different from some other fabric? Wikiseebs (talk) 16:31, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: What does that even mean?

message: The first paragraph of this might be 1911 Britannica - can someonve verify? - PKM 17:16, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That may explain the inconsistency with later in the article. The first para talks about half silk, and later all-cotton is mentioned. 71.175.28.121 (talk) 01:53, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Source
Talk:List of U.S. cities with large Filipino American populations

message: So there is no Filipino Americans in the South? I bet there is some. —Preceding unsigned comment added by  68.89.166.181  (talk • contribs)  13:28, 19 November 2006  
*Virginia is part of the South and Virginia Beach is part of Virginia. Virginia Beach has a significant Filipino American population. --Jmumman (talk) 20:29, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Wikified as part of the Wikification wikiproject! JubalHarshaw 19:07, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikified

message: last edit was in 2006. Census date is 2000. It's almost 2010. Woah, i see dusts and spiders everywhere!
Bulhis899 (talk) 01:55, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs updating
Talk:Richard Grindall

message: Highly untowardst...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.5.229.37 (talk) 23:27, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why has background on Grindall forebears been weirdly left out?
Talk:Northland Primary School

message: Just being curious, I decided to take a look at the web site of Northland Primary School ( http://www.northlandpri.moe.edu.sg/ ), and I noticed that a lot of the content under the About Us section on their web site were also in this article. Suspicious, I decided to do a bit of investigation, and after some digging I have decided to tag this article as a possible copyright infringement. On their web site a copyright notice is clearly stated at the bottom. I'm not sure whether the content from the Milestones section onward are copyright infringements since I'm unable to find them on the web site, so I have decided to exclude it for now. --A.K.R. (talk) 04:47, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for detecting and listing the problem. I have deleted back to the last verifiably clean. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:20, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Listing Article as Possible Copyright Infringement
Talk:Fantasyland

message: Under the Disneyland attractions listing, it says there will be a new tinkerbell ride in 2008. There is no citation, nor have I seen anything around the die-hard Disney fans boards about this. Unless there is a cite, we will need to remove it. Shinku Hisaki (talk) 07:52, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The rumors say it won't be a ride, but just a simple meet and greet.  --blm07 17:25, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll need to dig up the reference, but I do recall something more formal and in-print regarding it being a meet & greet. Tiggerjay (talk) 16:31, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Tinkerbell ride?

message: Why is there no list of shops in Fantasyland of the Magic Kingdom, when it is listed for the Fantasyland in the other Disney parks?--TimothyJacobson (talk) 10:48, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Shopping

message: Also, all the restaurants in MK Fantasyland were listed in bold.  I have restored these to normal font--TimothyJacobson (talk) 10:49, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Bold

message: Since the recent announcement on Tuesday, January 18, 2011, regarding the Fantasyland expansion in the Magic Kingdom, the names of new attractions coming as part of the expansion have been added, along with dates of when these attractions will open. Closing/reopening dates have also been added to attractions that will be affected by the expansion. As the updates are much appreciated, sometimes the improper dates or names are mistakenly added or changed. I believe I have corrected all existing errors, as well as added citations. Before changing these, please reference this posting on the Disney Parks Blog for more information on the Fantasyland expansion.
Also, I have removed the Storytime with Belle attraction from the listing because, according to this posting on the Disney Parks Blog, the final show was on September 12, 2010.
Thanks! --Jclavet (talk) 23:53, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attractions Affected by the Fantasyland Expansion in the Magic Kingdom 

message: Hi all, I'm starting to start a real article about Fantasyland at the title above, with the username eventually dropped, of course. Just developing it there, so that it can be polished enough to qualify for DYK, when it's ready.  --  Zanimum (talk) 18:16, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[user:zanimum/Fantasyland (Magic Kingdom)]]
Talk:Greek administration of Smyrna (1919–1922)

message: The events described in this text take place before 1923, but was it first published before 1923? The Blight of Asia, the source of this text, seems to have first been published in in 1926. This will need to be cleared up before this work can be moved to Wikisource. --Benn Newman 21:38, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The text from "The Blight of Asia" is not a candidate for copying to WikiSource as it is still under copyright protection and will remain so until 2018.  See the "Copyvio" section below for details. --Richard 06:34, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copying to Wikisource 

message: I am responsible for copying the text from "Blight of Asia" which is now being claimed to be a copyright violation.  Although I did not think it was a copyright violation at the time that I copied the text, I now recognize that it is a copyright violation and have rewritten the article to address the copyvio issues.  The rewritten text can be found in Talk:Greek administration of Smyrna (1919-1922)/Temp.
When I created this article, I thought I had two defenses against claims of copyright violation: an "expired copyright" defense and a "fair use" defense.  After some research this evening, I have discovered that I was wrong about the "expired copyright" defense.  The book was copyrighted in 1926 and the copyright was renewed in 1953.  The renewal was good for 47 years and thus would have expired for 2000 except that Congress passed a law in 1998 extending all copyrights in force by 20 years.  Aha, now I have learned why works published before 1923 are clearly in the public domain and those published afterwards may not be.
I still maintain that there is a "fair use" defense based on lack of substantial copying.  The text in question is only 5-6 paragraphs from a book that is 28 chapters long.  However, since it was never my intention to leave the copied text as a lengthy verbatim quote from the book, I have taken this opportunity to rewrite the text.  I believe the rewritten text addresses the charge of copyright violation.
--Richard 06:34, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree the rewritten text addresses the problem.  I don't know the exact procedure here.  But I have no objections to you replacin the the text and removing the template.--BirgitteSB 19:16, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio
Talk:Brent Michael Davids

message: Who were his composition instructors?  Badagnani 01:59, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Instructors 
Talk:Downtown Disney

message: The coordinates (linking to toolserver) are wrong; they point to the similar-named "Downtown Disney" in Walt Disney World in Orlando, Florida. I don't have experience with toolserver, so I'll let someone else perform the magic required -- Katana (talk) 22:37, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinates are wrong, point to Florida 

message: The cumbersome list of *every tenant ever* does nothing to add to the page and, as I pointed out, goes against WP:DIRECTORY - I added relevant tenant information on the page when I previously cleaned it up. As such, reverting the page back to having the massive directory is not helpful nor relevant. I'm restoring my edits, should the previous directory return then I will get a final ruling from administrators. Swishyhair (talk) 04:54, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tenant List / Directory
Talk:Disney's All-Star Sports Resort

message: I removed the links from the textbox.  They had linked named hotel area to the wikipage of the sport that they corresponded to.  I felt this is not an appropriate link. Gblaz (talk) 16:03, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Legend of Zorro (anime series)

message: This article should be merged with The Legend of Zorro (cartoon) as the information is more in depth and accurate. Dwanyewest (talk) 23:28, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. I merged (more like redirected) it here, since this article came first.--Nohansen (talk) 14:12, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Disney's Yacht Club Resort

message: This would all be very nice for a brochure, but this isn't one. What these Disney resort pages need is info like: Who was the architect and how can it be described architecturally? 212.204.134.138 18:07, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why does the mention of Crescent Lake link to a page of articles, none of which pertain to the Crescent Lake in Epcot? I am going to remove that link unless there are any objections.70.91.35.27 (talk) 17:02, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crescent Lake? 
Talk:Walt Disney World resorts

message: I removed the non-free images (resort logos) from this article because they were being used as decoration rather than illustration and there is no fair use rationale for their inclusion.  The images will remain in the individual articles of the resorts they represent since their illustrative use is appropriate in those articles.  -Thatdog 18:50, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 

message: * This should probably be deleted, or rather the content merged into appropriate articles.--Rtphokie 03:28, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What's the final step of a merge? A redirect. --NE2 03:32, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Has the merge been performed? If so, then redirect away.--Rtphokie 04:00, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion discussion
Talk:Fantasia Gardens

message: I am continuning to revert the edits made by an unregistered user that are conversational in tone, unreferenced, unencyclopedic, and not written according to the Wikipedia:Manual of Style. These edits would be appropriate for a personal blog or a fan page, but they do not belong in an encyclopedia article. If this continues, I will protect the article from editing by unregistered and new users. Ground Zero | t 13:23, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: This is still an encyclopedia, folks

message: The Walt Disney World website is not a reliable source. Please see Wikipedia:Reliable sources for more information. This article is not referencedd to any relaible sources. Ground Zero | t 13:27, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: As an unregistered user is edit-warring onthis article instead of discussing the issues I've identified above or trying to address them in his/her edits, I have had to protect the article from editting by unregistered and newly-registered editors. Ground Zero | t 15:43, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Semi-protection
Talk:Magic Kingdom Resort Area

message: I removed the non-free images (resort logos) from this article because they were being used as decoration rather than illustration and there is no fair use rationale for their inclusion. The images will remain in the individual articles of the resorts they represent since their illustrative use is appropriate in those articles. -Thatdog 20:23, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 
Talk:Animal Kingdom Resort Area

message: ==Untitled==
According to the Official web page https://disneyworld.disney.go.com/resorts/#/animal-kingdom-resort-area/
the Animal Kingdom Resort Area does not include Pop Century or Art of Animation resorts.
Any objects to this being corrected?
Craigthomas1 (talk) 23:14, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Correct resorts

message: According to the Official web page https://disneyworld.disney.go.com/resorts/#/animal-kingdom-resort-area/
the Animal Kingdom Resort Area does not include Pop Century or Art of Animation resorts.
Any objects to this being corrected?
Craigthomas1 (talk) 23:14, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Upper Cross Street

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: Victor R Savage, Brenda S A Yeoh (2004), Toponymics - A Study of Singapore Street Names. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Darylgolden(talk) Ping when replying 03:39, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Zeitgeist (ensemble)

message: Hi, GhostPirate, thanks for your interest in this page but it would be nice in future if you wait more than 30 seconds before tagging.  It takes at least a minute or two to get an article readly.  Okay?  Badagnani 21:51, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed it. Rettetast 22:02, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Summer Catch

message: The edits that I plan to make are rather simple. I plan to add a soundtrack subheading and I will include the list of songs and the artists that sing them. The second edit I will make is to add a production subheading. In this section I am going to talk about how the baseball field that was used in the movie was actually built from a field that had been abandoned for about twenty years. The movie was also not filmed in New England because the spring season was too cold so the actual production site was in Southport, North Carolina. Within about 8 weeks the field was complete with batting cages and a press box ready to film. The majority of the people casted for the roles of the teammates were actual minor league baseball players. Only seven of the 35 people casted for the roles of the teammates were actors. The baseball players had to attend a four-week training camp within which they learned how to ignore the cameras on the field and to feel or act more as a team. All of the actors and baseball players had legitimate baseball practice everyday.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bostonredsox313 (talk • contribs) 17:29, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Production/Soundtrack Subheading 

message: Looked up this article and noticed the plot summary was very short, and there was a little note requesting a better summary. So I watched the film in its entirety, and whipped one up for it. I did my best to not be too long, but not too short either. It can be difficult to tell at times what is too much and too little. So if anyone who oversees this page and feels it needs less, feel free to take a few points out. Like I said, I did my best. I also tried to include some of the summary that was already there, the beginning and the end of it. Aidensdaddy2k9 (talk) 05:36, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot Summary
Talk:CEPAS

message: file::c:File:FlashPay (ArrowCard).png Reason:This is an image of a commercial payment card, not "uploader's own work". subpage:link 
Message automatically deposited by a robot on 09:16, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  File nominated for deletion on commons
Talk:Intelligent Parking Assist System

message: ipas is also a wireless network standar 200.126.81.82
This section says that Toyota invented the technology, but “How Self-Parking Cars Work” by Ed Gradianowski http://auto.howstuffworks.com/self-parking-car1.htm says that Volkswagen demonstrated the technology in 1992.  (Kkraz (talk) 02:16, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: IPAS

message: This article was merged from Advanced Parking Guidance System per request, pending 3 months now--being bold; reasoning being, the technology is the same, either IPAS or APGS; it is marketed as IPAS internationally, the same system as APGS in the US; and the early version was IPAS, later version IPAS/APGS. SynergyStar (talk) 05:55, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Above history merged from Talk:Advanced Parking Guidance System. SynergyStar (talk) 21:17, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merged
Talk:Five Dollar Bob's Mock Cooter Stew

message: This is my first time really editing a page on wiki. I used the album itself as a source, plus the information provided on http://www.amazon.com/Five-Dollar-Bobs-Mock-Cooter/dp/B000002MNE?tag2=gp04-20 under Product Details. I feel that I should source this at the bottom, but it may look inappropriate to have a link to buy the album at the bottom of this entry. Not sure what to do, thanks 24.96.242.143 17:56, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've found two different listings for the track times. While it is only a few seconds differing on most of the tracks, the first two tracks have listings that are noticably different.
http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:sgdjvwdta9tk --- has one version of the track times
http://www.buy.com/retail/product.asp?sku=200735499&loc=&sp=1 --- has the other version of the track times
I've listed buy.com's track times as I own the EP and those are the times on mine. I'm not entirely sure what the difference is about and if I don't end up researching that myself later, it would be nice for someone to figure that out. Thanks.Crio3mo 21:21, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Track Times
Talk:Kryoburn

message: The intention was to have the article expanded - I'm not entirely sure what warrants whether or not a band should be placed on Wikipedia, but in my opinion Kryoburn seem known enough to have an article on them, which is why I believe the article should be kept. Thank you for your consideration.
Vekter14 22:03, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Immunes

message: Immune is a rank. This shouldnt be in unit types list. - —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.197.22.80 (talk • contribs) 
: Your comment is unsigned. Don't forget to sign with four tildes. Are you able to provide a cite for this please? I do not believe this is a rank since it extended across different duties such as engineering, surgery etc, it is more accurate to describe this as a unit type in opposition to infantrymen of the link of the main legions. Cheers - PocklingtonDan 20:59, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Disagreement

message: I have kicked off the proper citation method with a single example. Maybe Cruggieri can update the rest as they seem to be adding some good material and obviously know more than I do about this subject. Matt Beard (talk) 15:31, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Citing Sources

message: Does the current image show immunes, or just general Roman soldiers? If the latter than it does not belong here. Matt Beard (talk) 15:33, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image
Talk:Pigeon post

message: "The pigeons carried two kinds of despatch: official and private, both of which are later described in detail." In the section on Paris looks as if it may be lifted from a different source without proper attribution. Later in this section we do not really find official and private separately described in detail. While the section has attribution to a source (a book) it reads as if it was possibly lifted from a book and merely transcribed into wikipedia. If this in fact comes from the book, then the way it is currently used would be in violation of copyright law.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.0.91.3 (talk) 00:03, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Potential Copyright infringement

message: I don't really know anything about the subject so I'm not going to do a write-up, but if anyone sees this the opening paragraph seems to have had a chunk of it cut out, or something...
Deptstoremook 20:43, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The opening paragraph was left into its place by SlipperyHippo in an otherwise sensible edit. I wrote a short new opening paragraph and moved the sentece to its original place. --MPorciusCato 06:47, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

text: Pigeon post is the use....was good English. I'm changing it back. Sting au Buzz Me... 11:26, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Unclear opening paragraph

message: The post-related material at Carrier pigeon is proposed to merge into this article (if any of it needs to be retained), with the remainder merging to Homing pigeon, to which the emptied article title would redirect, and to War pigeon. This merge was first proposed (at Talk:Carrier pigeon) in September 2009 and was unopposed, but did not get performed. 
Please centralize discussion, at Talk:Homing pigeon#Proposed merge 2.
 — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  13:29, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Partial [[Carrier pigeon]] merge 

message: How did the pigeons pass their days? 120.89.104.232 (talk) 03:11, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  English
Talk:Sri Temasek

message: I was wondering what "Gazetted" means as a verb: it appears to be particularly focus on this one cultural context. Is there anyway a wiki-link could make this meaning more clear to readers?Sadads (talk) 20:32, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: As far as I am aware, this is standard English usage. It means "to publish in a gazette" – see "wikt:gazette#Verb". — Cheers, JackLee –talk– 20:38, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gazetted as a verb? 

message: The article states that no prime minister has ever lived there, but goes on to say that Lee Kuan Yew did stay there "in 1965 for a short time for security reasons".  Would it be more accurate to have the intro say that no prime minister has ever lived there, except on a temporary basis? --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 21:38, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Never lived there 
Talk:The Dancer Upstairs (film)

message: Although I have found numerous movie reviews which refer to the antagonist, Ezequel, as an "anarchist," these seem to refer to author bias.  No references to "anarchy," "anarchism," or "anarchists," are made within the movie.  The only references made focus on authoritarian socialism, or communism.  As such, I am removing this from the "Anarchist Films" Category.--Cast 08:47, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Anarchist Films?