Talk:EverQuest II: Kingdom of Sky

message: You Didn't Release Finished Raid Content when DoF Came out. (Broken Raids, No itemization of Raid zones, Nigh Impossible Encounters, Missing Raid Mobs.) You Didn't Release Finished Tradeskilling Content when DoF Came out. (No t6 Recipes for Some classes, No T6 Imbues, No T6 Fabled Crafting, Cut and Paste Crafting) You Didn't Release Finished Guild Progression Content when DoF Came out.(No Guild lvl 40 Mounts, Titles, or Rewards, no T6 Writs)
6 Months Later
Raid Content - Still Broken (Poor + Broken itemization, Djinn master, Pedestal of Sky, Missing Siyamak, Raid Mob Reset Bug) Tradeskilling Content - Still Broken ( Still no t6 Advanced T6 Carpentry, No Crafted Fabled, No Imbues for Throwing Weapons, No Variety in Crafting) Guild Content - Still Broken (Meager Guild level 40 Mounts, No Special Items, 2 Weak titles)
Now you expect us in 6 Weeks to Embrace a New expansion so you can sweep all the Broken DoF Content Under the Rug? You expect us to Grind 10 More levels and Replace all the T6 Raid Fabled that people barely have with T7 Rare Crafted? You Expect us to Ignore the Fact that in 6 Weeks, Major Content Blocking Bugs which have been in the Game for 6 Months STILL haven't been fixed?
Will Carpenter's Have T6 Recipes by Feb 21st? Will we Have High level T6 Writs before Feb 21st? Will the Djinn master Be beatable before Feb 21st? Will Level 30 Legendary Items STILL have More thoughfull and relatively usefull procs then T6 Raid Fabled? (Regeneration II anyone?)
If SOE answers no to ANY of these questions, DO NOT RAISE THE LEVEL CAP. A whole new tier = SOE can ignore these problems and sweep them under the rug. IF the expansion comes out, HOW long do we have to wait for the now "old" content to be fixed?? How long. Who will Answer that question.
Where is the Accountability with your Dev Team. Where is the Pride in your own game, and the Pride of releasing an awesome finished game with meaningfull content, because Honestly someone who is proud of what they do and works hard to please there customers wouldn't possibly release a game in such a state.
Ergo the Dev team must not care about their own game, that's the only reasonable explanation. Anyone who takes pride in their work would never allow this to happen.
:You realise that this page isn't administered (or in most cases even known about) by anyone at SOE, right? GeeJo (t)⁄(c) • 02:42, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Feedback 

message: :Image:Qeynosguard.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 08:00, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Qeynosguard.jpg