lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Cross Bones

message: Should this be in the category "Red-light districts in the United Kingdom" ? Winelight (talk) 21:42, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categories 

message: The references to John Constable's 'self promotional activities' and 'wilful reinterpretation' seem to be taking a deliberately provocative or combative tone. I would propose to edit the section to moderate these, if no-one has an objection, to simply state that Constable associates Cross Bones with the entry in Stow's work. Bamboo marimba (talk) 16:13, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  References to John Constable
Talk:Joe Brincat

message: He was a fantastic player, considered by many people as the best player in the world. 212.65.104.10 (talk) 08:25, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  His strategy in playing
Talk:Michael Falzon (politician)

message: While the disambiguation between Michael Falzon (actor) and this Michael Falzon was a move in the right direction I think we need another disambiguation from another Michael Falzon who was also a Maltese politician, an MP (1976-92), Minister (1987-92) and a candidate in the 2004 MEP election with the Nationalist Party.
Demdem (talk) 10:49, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need for further disambiguation 
Talk:Raymond Caruana

message: After living here for over seven years now, I know it's difficult to get a neutral point of view from anyone with the Maltese nationality, but this article was so incredibly biased that about half of it had to be removed. Nicholas Ellul died of an overdose, according to the newspaper article cited in the references. How did that all of a sudden turn into a suicide? Because that would suggest guilt, right? Had the author been on the other side of the political fence, he or she might have written 'he died under suspicious circumstances' which would have been equally biased.
The second paragraph reads like an advert for the PN and therefore doesn't belong on Wikipedia either, quite apart from the fact that it has nothing to do with the subject matter. If you want to refer to the violence of the 80's, make an article with all politically motivated violence and murders of that era. SeverityOne (talk) 19:39, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV
Talk:Graeme Sutherland

message: Hi. Just wondering what the source of "series 97" is for the debut episode reference. It's not in keeping with the series numbers for previous years' script covers - should be more like series 76. This might seem the most trivial question in the world, and probably is, but it is a show I'm researching and verification would be useful. Thanks.Iangreaves (talk) 13:23, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Week Ending
Talk:Nemali

message: There are Devastanam cottages behind the temple which are available on rent. The rooms are good enough for a night stay. You may also sleep in temple if you wish, fans are available in temple and you have to bring your bed and pillow to sleep.
If you are reaching Nemali by night better to have food in Wyra/Madhira/Khammam/Tiruvuru depending on the route you are coming from, there are no restaurants in Nemali. There are few small shutters of food stalls opposite temple but they dont operate till late in the night.
For the morning breakfast and tea walk into food stalls opposite temple which serve south indian delicacies like Idly, Dosa, Puri and etc..  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.111.223.43 (talk) 11:22, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: This information is more appropriate for WikiTravel than Wikipedia as Wikipedia is not a travel guide. -Drdisque (talk) 21:02, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accomodation at Nemali 

message: A must visit by the devotees of Lord Krishna Prasad Nukala (talk) 15:53, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lord Krishna 's temple town
Talk:Trond Kirkvaag

message: I had posted the  'banner' as I guess that Wikipedia may not be a tabloid site (is it?). If I am not wrong, then I may say that two items only could be integrated into the text:
*Trond Kirkvaag became involved in politics in the 70s, shooting a political campaign short film for the Rød Valgallianse (RV — Red Electoral Alliance) together with Klaus Hagerup Bøygen, April 2002: «Intervju med Dag Solstad” (Interview with Dag Solstad).. He usually didn't mix politics into his comedy skits.
*He co-wrote and directed a show for the trio “Tre kæll” (with Pål Nielsen, Øyvind Johannessen and Atle Jenssen) in 2001 and got involved with them in a campaign for strong health care reforms Dagbladet, June 2, 2001: «Latterlig helsereform» (Preposterous health care reform)..</br>
And though I have doubts about «Despite claims by the tabloid Se og Hør Se og Hør, June 22, 2007: «Skriver bok fra sykesenga» (He writes a book from his hospital bed)., he did not write or finish his autobiography from his hospital bed» being important, it may be relevant for the Norwegians or those who live there or read the Norwegian newspapers — especially tabloids like Se og Hør, VG and others. Should it be simply removed or should we have elements from it embedded in a sugar-free version? — Kanġi Oĥanko (talk) 13:40, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Vakkalagadda

message: I disgaree with most of the statements in this article. This is totally biased. Please provide the appropriate citations for the statements  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ppinnam (talk • contribs) 20:35, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Please provide the appropriate citations or please remove those contradictory statements which cause damage to the existing political parties.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ppinnam (talk • contribs) 01:48, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation needed 

message: Wikipedia is all about providing valid proofs. It is not about visiting the village and seeing all those developments over there. All the references you provided are not valid enough to show whatever mentioned is correct. Please provide valid references or remove those contradictory statements.
Ppinnam (talk) 14:34, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please provide valid references 

message: Development is an ongoing process. We cannot attribute success to a single group. Let's say tomorrow someone else is going to come to power and they just can't take the credit for the whole development unless it is a big revolutionary change. The result might be because of the ground work layed by the predecessors.
Since I can't provide a valid reference I am not going to give an one-sided statement in a site like Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a personal blog to express one's own ideas. So, if you can't provide a valid reference , Please don't put statements like "There is no development under CPI rule". You can have a neutral statement instead. 
Bottomoline: Reference needed.
Ppinnam (talk) 14:49, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation need to be there for statements in Wikipedia
Talk:Nude (art)

message: Target already has extensive history section. Much of content is duplicate. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 19:17, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose The impressive size of History of nude art and the number of sources suggests a separate article is warranted. Most of the content is clearly not copied from the main article. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 20:55, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Should the current section on history be shortened, the rest merged into the other article, and a hat note added to direct readers interested in more to go to the other article? — rsjaffe 🗣️ 21:18, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see why we can't have a large history section here, as well as a separate article with more detail. We do that for most countries. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 21:26, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

text: Actually this is the same guy who translated the very low-quality Sculpture in the Renaissance period.  This new one is 338,167 raw bytes, which is just too long. Neither of them are very high quality, but Nude (art) is better. The original Spanish text is quite good (much better than the sculpture one), & the refs ok (but all in Spanish), but the English phrasing, linking & so forth is poor. Johnbod (talk) 03:06, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

text: There's too much extra in the History one to do that, I think, but it does work as a subsidiary article. Johnbod (talk) 14:03, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

text: Yes - the English idiom throughout is shaky. I'd prefer the former. But let's leave that for now. Johnbod (talk) 16:13, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I hate to be picky so soon after my last proposed name change (to History of the nude in art) was accepted but, looking at the article again, would it not be more honest to call it History of the nude in Western art? --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 18:52, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Tucked away at the bottom there are actually sections on India (long, quite good), Japan and Africa. And Egypt & the Ancient Near East are covered. Johnbod (talk) 00:24, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[History of nude art]] into [[Nude (art)]] 

message: Wikipedia shoudl take a neutral stance, and a consensus has already been made on the section being named criticism instead of "issues"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.241.155.164 (talk) 13:10, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: ??Criticism seems less neutral than issues to me. Johnbod (talk) 19:29, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Appropriateness of the Term Issues
Talk:No. 216 Squadron RAF

message: https://twitter.com/RoyalAirForce/status/1151488533200351237
BlueD954 (talk) 14:14, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reformation 

message: I think this film  from about 15:05 might be relevant but I am not sure what the best use would be. Any ideas?SovalValtos (talk) 09:07, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Victoria Troop carriers
Template talk:Country data Republic of Texas

message: The two "Naval" ensigns should be changed to the new SVG versions (Same file names with .svg extentions; uploaded on Commons already). 68.39.174.238 (talk) 13:58, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Why is this template even protected? -- zzuuzz (talk) 16:45, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A week ago, User:East718 protected all the :Category:Country data templates (~900 of them), including very high-use ones with thousands and thousands of transclusions, but also very low-use ones like this.  I guess that was simpler than deciding what the dividing line should be.  Andrwsc (talk) 17:02, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: svg images

message: I added the Battle of Gonzales flag as a variant, mostly because I wanted to use it for my WikiCup 2013 flag. Yes, it's a bit selfish... but it's an awesome flag. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 04:18, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: "Come and Take It" flag
Talk:List of cities and towns in Finland

message: Can anyone provide the source of the population data used here?  It seems out of date.  The population of Lappeenranta was appx 72k (Jan 2011) not the appx 60k shown here.  The higher figure is taken from here http://vrk.fi/default.aspx?docid=4258&site=3&id=0  Would it be better to replace the table here with that one?
LookingGlass (talk) 10:39, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Data source
Talk:Gott strafe England

message: The phrase "Gott strafe England" is not taken from the poem "Hassgesang gegen England". 
The "Hassgesang" doesn't contain this phrase, which was created independently from the poem.  
Because of this I changed the passage in the article and I added an external link to the complete text of the poem "Hassgesang" in German and in English translation.
 
--Ausone (talk) 05:03, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Section title needs to be either Others' use or Other uses,  --Lineagegeek (talk) 20:43, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: B4

message: Hey, should we maybe add the fact that "Gott strafe England" is still used by the German imageboard pr0gramm.com to denote ("tag") images that show England in peril. These images are typically tagged with "Er strafe es" as well. You may see a collection at https://pr0gramm.com/new/gott%20strafe%20england  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.119.3.225 (talk) 22:18, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anecdote
Template talk:Avocet Line RDT

message: I changed the column of most of the connecting link names as it looks rather odd with the arrows for the Tarka Line (and Riviera line) off to the right of the page while the arrow for the main line is to their left, even though the geographic position is the opposite.
I haven't immediately reverted the reversion, but I don't think the current situation is appropriate. Geof Sheppard (talk) 14:10, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Connecting lines

message: While I recognise that the mile post change at Exmouth Junction can confuse matters, I disagree with the calculations of distances shown in this diagram. For example, according to my reading of the quoted reference, Exmouth Junction 170m 21ch from Waterloo and St Davids Junction is 172m 04ch . This makes them 1m 63ch distant, to which there is another 8 chains into St Davids station. This gives 1m 71ch or 1.8875 metric miles but the diagram currenlty shows 1.82 miles. There are some similar discrepancies further along the branch. Let me know if I have misread the mileages, otherwise I will correct the template shortly. Geof Sheppard (talk) 13:57, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Distances
Talk:Jon Almaas

message: Jon Almaas wife noe his fathers name can be eritten on Wikipedia, when som people in Wikipedis doesnt like that familys names is written  when they dont have their own pages on Wikipedia, because the are not "famous" enough. So then delete it. 188.113.95.213 (talk) 19:17, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Warning
Category talk:Wikipedia Mediation Cabal templates

message: errr, I just created this category. how did all those items suddenly get in here. this is strange. could some please help me figure this out? thanks! --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 14:15, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Took me a moment, but figured it. You've created the category, and inserted the category onto some of the templates themselves, such as . Some of those templates have been transcluded, not subsituted, onto certain other pages - that's to say that as the template changes, so the content of the other page changes. The new category of "Wikipedia Mediation Cabal templates" has thus been inserted by proxy onto those other pages. Hey presto, your brand new template page already has 127 pages in it. Hope that helps. Giles Bennett (Talk, Contribs) 17:00, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: gaaahhhh. thanks. I'll try to correct this. you're a genius. thanks so much. feel free to let me know of any other instances which you find. i may need some help with correcting this. thanks so much. sorry, everybody. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 17:03, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Category contents
Talk:Martens Clause

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 20:24, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: I am reverting this series of edits. The reasons I am doing this is beacause:
#The changes to the lead imply that it was brought in because of unlawful combatants, yet it was brought in because the minor powers did not agree that francs-tireurs were  unlawful combatants. The change in the lead presents the great powers POV as a statement of fact.
#I disagree with the moving of the cometary down to the end of the article, as what results is a first few sections that relies totally on primary and not secondary sources. The point about the comments by Rupert Ticehurs is his statements succinctly state the generally held opinions which it is easier to quote than risk copyright violations. Placing the statements at the end of the piece misses the point of why the statement are in the article in the first place.
#The new section section "Geneva Conventions" says "the Clause was repeated..." well no it was not the clause that was used in the Geneva Conventions the last sentence of the clause but dropped the phrase "among civilized peoples" (presumably as all nations are now considered civilized). I do not this that a section is needed for one sentence and there is no reason to mention the ICRC Commentary, as all it is saying is that under the Nuremberg principles the clause is now considered to be part of customary humanitarian law, this is better said in the mention of the U.S. Military Tribunal, United States v. Krupp. 
#If the Ticehurs cometary is moved back up the page then it already covers the this point made in the new paragraph on the ICJ (as the citation makes clear without an in text attribution which is made by the quote.
Having made the revert I will include couple of points mentioned above which I think would improve the article. If anyone wishes to re-add anything I have deleted an not reinstalled pleases discuss it and reach a consensus here on the talk page. -- PBS (talk) 23:29, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  August 2012 
Talk:Liarea

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 . It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:52, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Frank Steketee

message: With all due respect, "I remember" accounts such as this are almost always the product of someone's hazy memory:
There are press accounts of Steketee once having kicked a record 100-yard punt. According to one account: “I remember the Saturday Evening Post doing a writeup on U. of M. It told how Frank Steketee stood behind his own goal posts and made a punt which was picked up by the opposing team behind their goal posts.”  
I don't doubt that he made a long punt, but it's very unlikely that it was 100 yards. Even if the particulars of this account are true, the measurement of a punt starts from the line of scrimmage, which could have been as far up as the 10-yard line to still have him punting from the end zone.  It would be nice to see some corroborating primary account. Xuehxolotl (talk) 16:50, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that the account is not fully supported, and believe the language of the article accounts for the possibility that it is legend rather than fact.  Nevertheless, it is a part of the Frank Steketee story and legend and is appropriately included, subject to cautionary language.  If someone has the means to track down the referenced Saturday Evening Post article, that would be great.Cbl62 (talk) 16:54, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I came here with the same reservations. I think if an opponent picks the ball up in the end zone, that yardage would be included as well. But we are applying modern scoring standards to early-era football (also compromised by unofficial measurements and contemporary accounts) that make this anecdotal and would never be supported. As long as it's stated as it is ("reportedly") then it should be marginally acceptable.—Twigboy (talk) 17:59, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  100-yard punt
Talk:Haustrum haustorium

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 . It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  --Whpq (talk) 10:32, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Liareinae

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 . It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:52, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed