lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Tatars in Bulgaria

message: The site below is my web site. You can see it in the url.
*http://members.fortunecity.com/timurberk/kirim/ttrbg/tammakale.doc
I have all rights to publish this work. It was given to me by its autors to publish it. Like this work, many works about Crimean Tatars can be freely published.
Look:
*http://members.fortunecity.com/timurberk/kirim/ttrbg/bgtatarframe.html
This site was one of the first sites of Crimean Tatars on the Internet. It was created in 1999.
If there are volunteers to translate it to other langulages, French, German, Spanish... they can use this article.--Timurberk 23:33, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately, "permission" is not good enough, since WP re-licenses its work under the GFDL. I'll try to see if I can sort this out. --Storkk 08:32, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

text: Could you please clarify what "...can be freely published" means? is it public domain or GFDL? or simply permission to publish? The first two are OK for wikipedia, and the third is not. If you could add a note to your website, saying that the contents are GFDL or PD, that would solve the problem. --Storkk 08:40, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

text: Oh... one more thing: the reason why in this case, the fact that it's your website and that you put the information here is not good enough, is because you aren't the original author. Therefore, although you may have permission to publish the work wherever you like, as I stated above, simple permission is not enough. Cheers! --Storkk 08:42, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright

message: I don't have a time to edit it completely. I am so busy these days.--Timurberk 23:33, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Current Work

message: Predi da slojete copyvio template pitayte editora za informacia. ;)--Timurberk 23:33, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm sorry for blanking the page, I've really overlooked that it's your website, although I couldn't have known it for sure. Thanks for the information you provided.  → Тодор Божинов / Todor Bozhinov → Talk 18:43, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Na Todor

message: It seems a bit strange the article is called Crimean Tatars in Bulgaria. Shouldn't it be called Tatars in Bulgaria? In almost all sources they are called Tatars, not Crimean Tatars.--Aldux 15:33, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename?

message: The section I tagged has many problems (use of jargon, grammar, voice problems); hence my tag. --Storkk 08:31, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: rewrite tag
Talk:Ana Marie Cox

message: It wouldn't make sense to merge this article with Wonkette, since Ms. Cox has now (just recently) retired from blogging, and the website is being handed over to new editors. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Spikyrat (talk • contribs) .
:That was the conclusion reached in Talk:Wonkette. --waffle iron 23:55, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that the ISBN number should not be in the body of the text, as it is not being cited. For purchase purposes, it's easy to find anyway. Now if there was a separate "Books" section, that would be different. -- Avi 17:46, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Then make that separate section, don't delete the information. Writing that she has a book, but not giving the ISBN is like writing that she has a web site but not giving the URL. "It's easy to find anyway" is a justification for not writing any information in the article at all, just saying "oh, search on the web for it". --AnonEMouse (squeak) 17:54, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:   -- Avi 18:03, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I don't think it needs fixing. She has one novel, making a separate section listing all her books seems unnecessary to me. I like it the way it is. --AnonEMouse (squeak) 18:07, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

text: Even better now. Full data including ISBN, OCLC, and LCCN in reference section with no prose interruption. -- Avi 18:09, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Good solution, thank you! --AnonEMouse (squeak) 16:07, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: The last sentence "Cox is young, and has no academic, diplomatic, governmental, or military experience" is highly inacurate.  If there are no objections, I'm removing it.  --MathewBrooks 15:12, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You could have just removed the "young" part. 76.229.223.171 06:37, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last Sentence 

message: Can anyone confirm that AMC graduated from the American Studies program at UC Berkeley? Siweiluozi (talk) 23:51, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Graduate education? 

message: In a video at Americablog posted 9/1/08, John Aravosis claimed Ana Marie now worked at Congressional Quarterly. Peacearena (talk)  —Preceding undated comment was added at 15:59, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Career
Talk:Billy Elliot

message: Isn't it about time that someone made an article for the musical? I'd do it, but, despite having seen it, I don't know enough and the website's not the most helpful. Cheers! —This unsigned comment was added by Willnz0 (talk • contribs) .
:I do believe there is a seperate article for that, which can be found here --JJMan 20:35, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Musical

message: The infobox was missing alot and had some errors, I fixed it all and did a little cleanup on the page. I made a plot section and will do a little more work to raise the page's rating. If you think I messed up or want some help, please write here or better, leave me a message Caf3623 04:59, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox

message: OK. I just added ALL of the nominations and awards that the film recieved from 2000-2001. It took forever. Also, I have looked over this article and really think that it can be upgraded to B-Class, so I changed the assesment on it to B. Caf3623 06:18, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The article should be Start-class, no offense to you on all your hard work but check out Wikipedia:WikiProject_Films/Style_guidelines for information that all articles need to even be considered for a higher class, B-class is very close to being complete. Cbrown1023 19:59, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Nominations & Awards/Class

message: Where did the information for the first part of the paragraph come from? I don't recall it being in the movie at all but maybe I'm wrong? --Breezy hwesta 09:22, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  plot 

message: It is stated that Billy has to miss ballet due to the strike.  I remember in the film however, Billy's dad finding him doing ballet and banning him from doing it any more.  Billy agrees and tries to keep his promise to begin with, but partly due to his mother's letter and partly due to his friend, and also due to his instructor, he goes to the audition in London and is accepted for ballet school.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.42.152.148 (talk) 17:40, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Accurate?
Talk:Battle of Hunterstown

message: * Ensured that this article is: within project scope, tagged for task forces, and assessed for class. 
* This article would benefit from:  expansion, sections (Prelude, The battle, Aftermath), in-text citations. --Rosiestep (talk) 18:32, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008]]
Talk:Battle of Hoover's Gap

message: I don't understand why the Tullahoma Campaign page is only about the Battle of Hoover's Gap. Randy Golden (talk) 13:05, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Campaign?

message: Ensured that the article is: within project scope, tagged for task forces, and assessed for class.  It would benefit from: expansion, sections (Prelude, The battle, Aftermath), and in-text citations.  --Rosiestep (talk) 17:36, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Hoover's Gap was the only actual battle during the campaign; all of the rest was maneuvering. Our normal practice is to have a separate campaign article that summarizes the actions in multiple battles, including a campaign map, if possible, but since this one has only one battle, we (I) did not bother. It is on my to-do list, but not at a very high priority. You are welcome to take a stab at it. Check out some of the other campaign articles, such as Gettysburg Campaign or Northern Virginia Campaign for examples. Hal Jespersen (talk) 16:45, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008]] 
Talk:Battle of Bull's Gap

message: Bulls Gap has no apostrophe in it. It is plural, not genitive. More than one bull. See e.g. Bulls Gap, Tennessee. --173.230.96.116 (talk) 05:53, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This is the name used by the National Park Service (see References). I also checked a biography of Breckinridge and Pfisterer's Statistical Record. In the last century, the US government has been systematically removing apostrophes from geographic names, which is probably what happened in this case. Hal Jespersen (talk) 17:37, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect article name. 

message: An unregistered editor added this information which I believe could either be a footnote or added here. This is the text: "A minor point of interest is the participation of Company A, 3rd Regiment Confederate Engineer Troops in the fight, losing three killed and four or five slightly wounded.  This was the highest documented loss for this service arm and they were rarely directly engaged in combat.  McCalla himself was absent on furlough and Lieutenant James Morrison commanded the company (Letter, Captain R. C. McCalla to his wife Margaret, November 28, 1864-RG703 in Auburn University’s Civil War Letters: Civil War in the American South as the Speake-McCalla Letters 1863-1865)." [97.125.133.243]
I'm removing it from the article and leaving it here for other editors to discuss. My inclination is to leave it as a note on the Talk page.
Spacini (talk) 19:06, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Footnote?
Talk:Battle of Blountville

message: This battle was in Blountville, not Blountsville. I renamed the article accordingly. Before I renamed it, I posted a query at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history/American Civil War task force#Basis for spelling of battle name?. My reasons for the renaming are fully outlined there. --Orlady (talk) 02:33, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renamed Blountsville to Blountville 
Talk:Battle of Fair Garden

message: Please note that the text is copied word-for-word from this article. http://www.cr.nps.gov/hps/ABPP/battles/tn029.htm Djmaschek (talk) 05:37, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Word-for-word copy
Talk:Battle of Fort Donelson

message: I intend to nominate this article for A-class as soon as I can figure out Wikipedia's labyrinthine procedures for doing so. If someone beats me to it, I will be happy to second the nomination. PKKloeppel (talk) 14:08, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  A-class 

message: "He attempted to convince his own rival, Don Carlos Buell, to take charge of the campaign as a means of getting his additional forces engaged, but despite Johnston's high regard for Buell, he was as passive as Grant was aggressive."  Does the first "he" refer to Halleck?  Or to Grant?  Johnston's sudden intrusion into the sentence muddies the waters, too.  And the last "he" - who does that refer to? Bertport (talk) 14:27, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I can. See revision. Hal Jespersen (talk) 03:12, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who can clarify this sentence? 

message: Shouldn't the text in the article reflect that Grants writes "I am sir, very respectfully, your obedient servant" as seen in the Grants reply picture next to text instead of simply "very respectfully
Yours" as it appears in the article currently? 2601:40:C601:4369:5A5C:672F:3242:C42B (talk) 15:30, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grants reply Text
Talk:Battle of Fort Sanders

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Kurz & Allison - Assault on Fort Sanders.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on October 19, 2014. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2014-10-19. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:22, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Kurz & Allison - Assault on Fort Sanders.jpg]] to appear as POTD 
Talk:Battle of Hatchie's Bridge

message: I realize this is based on what the government site calls the outcome of this battle, but how is it a Union victory when they attempt to cut off the retreat of a defeated Confederate army (from the Battle of Corinth), fail to do so, and suffer more casualties than the Confederates in the process of trying? 71.52.135.235 (talk) 22:59, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, the article (and the NPS page it copies) says "Ord had forced Price to retreat, but the Confederates escaped capture or destruction." Replace the names with Meade and Lee and you have the Gettysburg result as well. This is a stub article and definitely needs more information about the battle and its aftermath. Any volunteers? Hal Jespersen (talk) 23:58, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Union victory? 

message: The map shows the Tuscumbia flowing into the Hatchie in Mississippi. The Tuscumbia actually enters the Hatchie further north, in Tennessee, very near Pocahontas.  This is important.  
Young's Bridge crosses the Tuscumbia north of the state line.  Further west and also in Tennessee, Davis' Bridge, or Hatchie Bridge, crosses the Hatchie River.  This where the main action occurred.  The Confederates had to stop the Federal forces at both bridges, keeping the Federals west of the Hatchie and east of the Tuscumbia, while the wagon train went south, between the two streams, to cross the Hatchie at Crum's Crossing (which is a bit south of the state line).  The Confederates' success at Davis' Bridge enabled them to escape after their defeat at Corinth, and avoid being trapped between the two rivers.Gouldhagler (talk) 14:49, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: After looking at the satellite view in Gmaps, I believe the above assertion is true. It's likely that the map creator made an error and this does somewhat negatively affect the accuracy of this article. Unfortunately the map creator is no longer an active participant on Wikipedia. I'll leave a message on his talk page in case he pops by and send him an email, if his email still connects. Thanks! BusterD (talk) 19:21, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The map creator has replied to my email and expressed a willingness to adjust the map based on sourcing. Is there a reliable source upon which to base a contemporary location for the rivers and their meeting? BusterD (talk) 23:48, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The map is incorrect
Talk:Second Battle of Memphis

message: The writer confuses General Nathan Bedford Forrest, who led the raid on the Irving Block Prison, with his brother Captain William Forrest, who as an escort on that raid rode his horse into the lobby of the prestigious Gayoso House Hotel to arrest Union General Washburn, who escaped as described.
I lack the resources at present to fix this entry, so I invite someone to fix it up.  This article facilitated the common confusion by citing only the Forrest surname.  This error was then propagated to History_of_Memphis,_Tennessee#Civil_War, which I have remedied.
See http://tnsocr.org/chaptersofthetnsocr/5mariambeckforrest.html. Ray921 (talk) 04:30, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Battle of Mossy Creek

message: Short, needs wikification, sources. Carom 03:28, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:Third Battle of Murfreesboro

message: I cannot find any sources for that, and I've removed this claim in his bio, see Talk:Włodzimierz_Krzyżanowski#Did_he_participate_in_the_Third_Battle_of_Murfreesboro.3F. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 00:15, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Krzyżanowski's participation
Talk:First Battle of Murfreesboro

message: i was there during it and i got shot in the eye  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.49.8.113 (talk) 01:13, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Lisa the Tree Hugger

message: there is a level in the simpsons called lisa the treehugger.do you think this should be mensioned in the article?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mariofan1000 (talk • contribs) 11:15, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  failure to note the simpsons game 

message: What is the name of the song over the closing credits?  How about the song while part is Menu Ninja?  Is it part of the same song? 97.85.163.245 (talk) 23:29, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: "Spybreak!" by Propellerheads 1997 from the Matrix found at http://www.snpp.com/.  They have about every trivial fact about any Simpsons episode there.  97.85.163.245 (talk) 00:08, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Credits music 

message: When Lisa visits Jesse in jail, they have an exchange where he says "I'm a level five vegan. I won't eat anything that casts a shadow." I've come across "Level 5 Vegan" bumper stickers on more than one occasion and recently came across the phrase while reading. Alas, when I came to Wikipedia to discover which episode it was from, I was thwarted. I'd like to add the quote as I believe it serves to illustrate the assertion that Lisa "feels intimidated when she sees that he (Jesse) is more dedicated to environmentalism than she is". It is also, as far as I know, the only instance in the series where Lisa mentions considering veganism. Google gives 20K hits for "level five vegan" and 45K for "level 5 vegan". Currently this article mentions neither the cameo by Paul and Linda McCartney in the episode nor doesn't mention the word "vegetarian". Gobonobo T C 22:24, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Unless you can show the quote is notable, it shouldn't be included. Plus, it's stupid, when the sun is at a low angle, anything will cast a shadow. Also you're confusing Paul and Linda with Lisa the Vegetarian. Linda died 2 years before this episode. CTJF83 22:33, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: You're quite right. I was conflating the two episodes, so striking that. I believe the impossibility of food not casting a shadow is part of the humor. I'll see if I can't find sources that specifically establish notability of that quote. Gobonobo T C 00:11, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds good. CTJF83 00:19, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Vegan quote
Talk:Metro INOX Cinemas

message: I think there is something like 70mm movie and sound effect related to this cinema house. There is some grading of Cinema houses too. Metro would not be graded same as Alankar for example. A reference to black marketing of the tickets up to x times of original price, Number of weeks a hit movie (like Sholay) stayed in this Cinema and such kind of records might be hiding somewhere. This cinema has gone through upgrades, so there is some history there too. Npindia 23:45, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: History

message: acording to another wikipedia article 10 people were killed at this location by 2 pakistani terrorists during the 2008 attack on mumbai. the history section should at least mention this attack and provide a link to the page on the 2008 mumbai attack.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.27.126.209 (talk) 19:17, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  terrorist attack 
Talk:Inventor (patent)

message: Can anyone fill in what the law is related to inventorship in Japan?, China?, India?--Nowa 23:45, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Japan

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Deceased inventor. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 15#Deceased inventor until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Beeblebrox (talk) 18:07, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Deceased inventor" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Iraqi Intelligence Service

message: I've just begun an expansion of this article, beginning with history. When I have time, I'll come back and finsih of the history and begin with the rest of it. --Stretch 23:45, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Finished expanding history; still rather brief, but that's all I could find out there. I've changed the tag to Expansion, due to the fact that there's no information on techniques, structure, etc. I haven't seen any information of that sort out there, can anyone help? --Stretch 07:21, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Found structure information. Listed directorates/bereaus, will add descriptions as I have time. --Stretch 09:27, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved expansion tag to history section now that structure is finished--Stretch 00:46, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Battle of Ball's Bluff

message: Text and box casualty numbers do not match. I have Fed: 46killed, 198wounded, 529captured/missing, 100+ drowned; Conf: 36k, 117w in one source - Fed:49k, 158w, 533c, 100+ drowned; Conf: 36k, 117w, 2c in the Winkler book - and Fed: 49k, 158w, 714 c/m; Conf: 33k, 115w, 1m in the Eicher work. Any consensus out there? The last para of the 'Battle' section has other numbers and a cite, plus an added statement that needs citing. Kresock (talk) 00:46, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't have the figures, but you can cite approximates and then list the discrepancies in the footnotes. In the meantime, do you have the correct Eicher title in the Refs? Hal Jespersen (talk) 14:21, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm rereading Jim Morgan's book, and I don't see any final numbers. I'll see if he might shine some definitive sourcing light for us. BusterD (talk) 15:16, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Morgan does specify 553 Union prisoners (p. 178). BusterD (talk) 15:26, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Got a quick reply to an email from Jim. His best source is from Vol VII, Table XXXVIII of The Medical and Surgical History of the Civil War. US: KIA 223, WIA 226, Missing 445. CS: KIA 36, WIA 264, Missing 2. He differs from the chart in one specific: he can account for 3 CS missing by name. In Morgan's book (p. 183) he discusses why the 49 Union dead figure is incorrect. He estimates (p. 184) "the Union death toll at Ball's Bluff approached 250." I'm guessing there's overlap between the 226 wounded and the 553 prisoners. BusterD (talk) 16:17, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

text: Got it. BusterD (talk) 04:21, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: March 19 edits

message: The map of the battle area is very hard to interpret, even when enlarged. You would do better with a graphic representation of the area, showing Leesburg. Valetude (talk) 07:53, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  New map? 

message: Apparently both sides considered Leesburg specially important. Could we have the reasons for this? Valetude (talk) 12:10, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Strategically important' Leesburg
Talk:Battle of Big Bethel

message: This proposal is to merge Big Bethel order of battle into the Battle of Big Bethel article.
*Merge The Battle of Big Bethel is only 60k in size, which is not the biggest article size, i've seen. The merge would only increase by a small amount. scope_creep talk  12:38  24 August  2014 (UTC)
* Merge Per scope creep. TinaG (talk) 18:07, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: With the further explanation of the proposal, and comments of opposing editors below, I definitely oppose the proposal. Donner60 (talk) 02:07, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Into Battle of Big Bethel

message: You say: ...Brigadier General Ebenezer W. Peirce, a Massachusetts militia general of apparent bravery but no military training or experience.
His own wiki page says: Peirce enlisted in the 4th Artillery, Massachusetts Volunteer Militia, in 1843, and continued his service up to and including the Civil War.
Can you clarify? Valetude (talk) 01:33, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peirce