Talk:Levonorgestrel-releasing implant

message: Let's all work on reaching a consensus for a new infobox to be placed on each individual birth control method's article.  I've created one to start with on the Wikipedia Proposed Infoboxes page, so go check it out and get involved in the process. MamaGeek (Talk/Contrib) 12:26, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Infobox for individual birth control method articles 

message: I would like to treat this parameter the same on all the hormonal contraception articles.  Please read my opinion and discuss this issue at Talk:Combined oral contraceptive pill#Weight parameter in infobox. LyrlTalk     C   21:30, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weight gain parameter in infobox 

message: Hi everyone, I'm no expert at all in editing Wikipedia articles, I found 5 modifications that were only vandalism and tried to remove them, but I don't know if I was doing it correctly. Could please somebody take proper care of that? Thanks and I'm really really sorry if I made any mistakes.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.125.76.55 (talk) 07:30, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: The medical notes section says "Insertion by untrained doctors had higher rates of local scarring and resultant difficulties in removal". This is not surprising. What is meant by "untrained doctors"? Does this mean 3rd world doctors? does this mean doctors who are not trained as doctors? does this mean doctors who have not been specifically trained in Norplant I/II installation? 
This looks a lot like non-specific fluff trying to reassure potential users that scarring and removal difficulties do not occur when a competent doctor administers the product. Without any reference or statistics this is getting close to saying scaring and removal difficulties occur only if the doctor administering the product is not competent. I will remove the note.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.90.123.21 (talk) 02:54, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Medical Notes section 

message: Norplant has been discontinued in the United States for good reason. So, why is it being dumped on poor and unsuspecting Third World women? If it is not good enough for US women, it should not be marketed anywhere. Aren't our sisters around the world experiencing the same problems, complications, and side effects, perhaps with less access to medical care?
108.101.22.188 (talk) 07:19, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Third world countries 

message: how long does this side effect take for norplant,if you thunk your pregant  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.11.65.102 (talk) 19:38, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  how? 

message: This section is almost completely based on a single source by Dorothy Roberts. This section should be completely rewritten to summarize relevant work on the subject rather than the single source. VQuakr (talk) 09:09, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Didn't do any research, but rewrote to reduce emphasis on Roberts and remove some editorializing. Corrected two facts that seemed to be wrong: the philly.com editorial seems to be careful to not outright endorse incentives, and the Baltimore program seems not to have "enforced" the use of Norplant. Rolf H Nelson (talk) 04:38, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy section 

message: This article has mentioned here at the WP:NPOV noticeboard. OlYeller21Talktome 05:45, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOVN 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Levonorgestrel-releasing implant. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20020209132924/http://www.rxlist.com/cgi/generic2/norplant_ad.htm to http://www.rxlist.com/cgi/generic2/norplant_ad.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:02, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Levonorgestrel-releasing implant. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://erc.msh.org/dmpguide/resultsdetail.cfm?language=english&code=LEV75S&s_year=2014&year=2014&str=75%20mg%2Frod&desc=Levonorgestrel&pack=new&frm=ROD&rte=SC&class_code2=&supplement=&class_name=%28%29%3Cbr%3E
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120905222505/http://www.popcouncil.org/pdfs/jadelle_monograph.pdf to http://www.popcouncil.org/pdfs/jadelle_monograph.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:01, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified