Talk:Ed Pastor

message: I noticed your changes to Ed Pastor, and I don't think I agree with them.
First, I don't see what is gained by not using the header attribute for a table.  It centers the topic and makes it clear what office is being shown.  Am I missing something here?  To have the topic just a patch of text means that it looks out-of-place and might get removed by somebody not knowing its purpose.  It just doesn't look as good.
As for combining rows in which the same candidate ran...  it's a trickier issue, and while it doesn't look bad on the Ed Pastor article, I think it has problems elsewhere.  Consider the article Mike Sodrel; with Sodrel likely to run again in 2008, theoretically both columns should be continuous rowspans with Sodrel & Hill's names, except they trade off who wins and who loses.  It'd be awkward at best to show this in continuous columns, and would look strange to have the columns randomly cut off for a loss when it's the same person (as in Baron Hill's article).  The best compromise, in my mind, is to list the person each time - it is a new election, after all.  No need to worry about awkward 2-3-1-4 odd rowspans coming up; just a nice clean grid.
I'd be fine with moving this discussion off to the Congress Wikiproject's talk page if you want to. SnowFire (talk) 21:41, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Electoral history table style

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Ed Pastor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080730201058/http://clerk.house.gov/member_info/electionInfo/index.html to http://clerk.house.gov/member_info/electionInfo/index.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:09, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Ed Pastor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070418164412/http://www.azsos.gov/election/VoterReg/Active_Voter_Count.pdf to http://azsos.gov/election/voterreg/Active_Voter_Count.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070329023507/http://www.azsos.gov/election/PreviousYears.htm to http://azsos.gov/election/PreviousYears.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070105005758/http://majoritywhip.house.gov/meet_team.html to http://majoritywhip.house.gov/meet_team.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060914145239/http://www.vote-smart.org/issue_rating_category.php?can_id=H0101103 to http://www.vote-smart.org/issue_rating_category.php?can_id=H0101103
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:45, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Pastor is such an exotic, oddly spelled complicated name. You're right, we need a goddamn sound spelling.--2601:5C0:4280:3D40:A9D9:CF07:6273:46D2 (talk) 15:04, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sound spellings 

message: I am finding that many of the citations purporting to back claims about his political positions do not mention either him, the issue, or both. They are generic pages about some lobby or his voting record or endorsements. It would be helpful to see deeper links, or specific stories about how he actually voted here. 2600:8800:1880:188:5604:A6FF:FE38:4B26 (talk) 04:15, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations too general for specific political issues