lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ray Magliozzi

message: The top of the article states that Ray was born in 1949; but the link at the bottom associates him with 1948 Births.
Since I don't know which is correct, I did not make a change; but if someone knows, a correction would be wise.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by David305 (talk • contribs) 16:05, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article for Arlington, MA includes Ray Magliozzi in its list of notable residents/people.  Is this true in any way?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.93.198.77 (talk) 18:21, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arlington, MA 

message: I'm proposing we merge the articles for Tom and Ray Magliozzi. Look, I love these guys, but their articles have a great deal of redundancy, and I think it would be better to address them jointly. I have no real preference on a name for the joint article, although Tom and Ray Magliozzi, Magliozzi brothers, or Click and Clack would probably be best. There's ample precedent for such an arrangement: see :Category:Articles about multiple people. If you have one, please state your preference for a joint article title. --BDD (talk) 21:54, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:The Gashlycrumb Tinies

message: Okay, I went ahead and added the list of the children and their fates.  Feel free to tweak it to perfection, but let's not take exact lines from the book, as that would violate copyright.--み使い Mitsukai 05:40, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with whoever deleted the list that there should be no list, but I don't think copyvio is really the reason I'd use.  For one thing, this article links directly to a scan of the entire book: clearly a much worse copyvio if indeed the book is still copyrighted.  But also because it ruins the suspense of the book if you can read it all before you see the pictures.  <FONT COLOR="#800000"><B>Haplolology</B></FONT> Talk/Contributions 01:23, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  List added
Talk:Bariolage

message: In the minuet of Joseph Haydn's Symphony #28, the same note is repeated many times while alternating from fingered on one string to open on another.  It sounds a bit different than when the note is repeated on the same string.  Is this another form of "bariolage" or is it called something else? DavidRF 20:12, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it's bariolage, since it is a rapid alteration between notes on different strings. It doesn't matter if the notes played on the different strings are the same or not; it's bariolage in any case. +ILike2BeAnonymous 01:30, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can this apply to the case where the same note is repeated on different strings? 

message: "In the following example, from a violin sonata by Handel,[1] the second measure is to be played with bariolage."  Who says so?  Handel gives no such indication, and although it would be reasonable to assume that open A's are intended, 2000 1000 2000 1000 is just as likely a fingering. 
87.115.254.180 (talk) 00:22, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who says so? 

message: FYI, Baker's 1907 Dictionary of Musical Terms defines bariolage as a "waistcoat pattern" produced on sheet music by a series of cadenzas. Hyacinth (talk) 21:15, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Citing Stainer and Barrett, as it happens (this would be Stainer and Barrett's A Dictionary of Musical Terms, 1876). As it stands, this is completely incomprehensible (to me, at least). Further investigation indicates this is not quite accurate, however. Stainer and Barrett say that "bariolage" is a French term for a medley, which in turn they define (on page 50) as "a cadenza, or a series of cadenzas, whose appearance forms a design upon the music paper, a 'waistcoat pattern' as it is called by performers". Clearly a different sense from the stringed-instrument technique, though (just barely) comprehensible in the context of the original meaning of the French word: "a strange mixture of colours".—Jerome Kohl (talk) 06:23, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: "Waistcoat pattern"

message: Is it bariolage if the technique is applied to guitar? I've only seen this term applied to bow instruments or other classical instruments. Also, none of the many songs with guitar bariolage are listed under "Twentieth-century extensions". Most famously, AC/DC's guitarist uses this technique throughout their song "Thunderstruck".
I can think of several more rock and heavy metal songs that use this technique on guitar:
*AC/DC
**"Thunderstruck"
*Avenged Sevenfold
**"Hail to the King"
*Children of Bodom
**"Silent Night, Bodom Night"
**"Towards Dead End"
*Iron Maiden
**"Wasted Years"
Not sure if any of this info can be added, but I was curious if it is legitimate to call this technique "bariolage".
— Tha†emoover†here (talk) 07:30, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guitar bariolage?
Talk:Nucleomorph

message: Shouldn't this belong to :Category: Organelles? --Kupirijo 20:13, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: this article uses the term organelle. --JWSchmidt (talk) 20:38, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Organelle

message: Only found in a few photosynthetic eukaryotic protists.  Are we making all photosynthetic eukaryotes plants?  I don't think so.  KP Botany 21:40, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Plants banner

message: Am I right in assuming that the nucleomorph lies between the membrane(s) enclosing the prokaryotic photosynthetic apparatus and the membrane(s) enclosing the eukaryotic part of the plastid?
This article would benefit from illustrations. How about a TEM or SEM showing the nucleomorph in its plastid? How about a drawing?
Solo Owl (talk) 11:09, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Morphology
Talk:Libertyland

message: Things Change pretty quickly. The TRex (Joyland Wichita) Group. Now have announced that they wont be buying the park now. . The mentioning of them not buying the park is at the bottom of the article. Unless Something Changes I am rewriting the Recently Section. Sawblade05 20:13, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  TRex Purchase Falls Through

message: There needs  to be pictures of the rides because if they don't have pictures then the peolpe might not wont to go. On the Six Flags wikki page they have pictures and that made me and my family wont to go twice then me and my other side of the family went and had fun cause we had pictures.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 170.211.109.195 (talk) 15:59, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  where are the pictures? 
Talk:Quake II missions

message: Gamefaqs  probably has more than enough source to be compared and stated as source, right? Anyone willing to compare here and there and say that there is a source? 189.5.136.36 20:14, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

message: Allow me to explain why I opposed the PROD:
*Previously, the mission article was part of the original Quake 2 article as viable information. However, when the article became too bloated, it was outsourced to a separate article. While I do believe that the article could use a deletion or a merger, a PROD is not the best way to do this. It is a better idea to take the case to AfD, where the community as a collective can debate on the issue safely. I have no doubt that this would be considered a case of controversial deletion. That being said, I'm willing to hear an expanded argument based on policy and previous examples. If the argument stands well enough, I would not contest the deletion, under the exception that you grant enough time for me to preserve the information. I can think of a few communities that may benefit from this information.--WaltCip 14:45, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opposed PROD
Talk:Slip (treatment)

message: Have a problem. Created the article, but did not create the articles' title (it was on a request list at WP:PSY). How can I remove addiction from the title, or at least put it inside brackets? For the term is also used in some eating disorders (though I admit its most prominent use has been in drug addiction disorders). Cheers! Raystorm 20:14, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Do a page move. Just select the "Move" tab at the top of the article and you have the option to choose the title you want. NeoChaosX  (talk, walk) 20:19, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! :) Raystorm 20:34, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Changing article name
Talk:Rusty Cooley

message: Yes, that's his real name.  
Actually it is not . His birth name is Russel   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.198.56.149 (talk) 19:53, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I re-did the ALS link so it no longer links to the ALS Disambiguation page. It now links directly to the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis page. Crashedata (talk) 21:06, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-link ALS link 

message: Is it just me or does the Protone Pedals section appear to be a blatant advertisement for his signature pedal? 136.142.110.17 (talk) 21:20, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protone Pedals section 

message: This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because it does credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject. — 99.57.11.0 (talk) 10:22, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contested deletion 

message: I've just added two new issue tags because this article reads like a resume and makes several statements about the person without actually imparting information. There are also some claims made about album credits that I've been unable to verify.
This article has previously been considered for deletion due to a lack of subject notability. The decision was to keep it, but I suspect that if this was re-written to be truly neutral there wouldn't be enough material left to constitute a full article. Cloventt (talk) 04:36, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multiple Issues
Talk:Three Gorges

message: pictures people??!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
Yeah, this is considered one of the best scenic places of China and there are no pictures at all of them?
We REALY need pictures.
** How about some information about the environmental problems this project has caused! 128.187.0.164 22:24, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Three Gorges Dam is a separate article and only a fairly small summary of it as it relates to the Three Gorges is appropriate here. I don't think merging would be a good idea at all. Richard001 (talk) 08:51, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Pictures

message: A representation of the Westernmost gorges appears on Chins's currency,the back of the paper 10 yuan in stead of 5 yuan.Is it?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.183.104.12 (talk) 04:16, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct a mistake.
Talk:Revenue Act of 1862

message: I have for years been searching for the text of this law to translate... and the search is not yet over. The search engines are under the impression it is findable here. Is it? 
I see up in the top right that this seems to have interested the translation folks here too.   SO WHERE IS IT?  
I found some Kill-Aaron-Swartz legalese-bait links, but no cheeze. That's the deal? translator (talk) 16:09, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is the text so well-hidden?
Talk:Wilson–Gorman Tariff Act

message: All through this page are assertions that are not supported by cited sources 2600:387:F:5730:0:0:0:6 (talk) 20:11, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsupported statements
Talk:Billy Sanders

message: Does anyone know the chapionship held in the late 1970's at Hackney which was won by Billy, he had a match race run-off to win, this was one of the greatest races I have seen.
why on earth should this be deleted? Not only was Billy Sanders an Australian international who starred in a championship winning team in 1976, he committed suicide while at the top of his profession. It's pretty famous where i live thank you very much. 
Also, this is a missing link from pages where he is already referred to. . The article has this note on it 
"There are very few or no other articles that link to this one.
Please help introduce links in articles on related topics."
so i fill in a link and someone tries to delete it?
: Well, the article didn't say he was in the championship winning team, or that he was famous, or that his suicide came at the top of his profession. It's not enough for someone to be notable - the article has to say they were, and cite reliable sources that back up that claim. -- Finlay McWalter | Talk 01:16, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Le Roy, New York

message: I changed the outbreak date to reflect 2011 instead of 2012.  You can read the official report which states that the investigation started in October 2011:  24.225.23.137 (talk) 07:37, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changed outbreak date from 2012 to 2011 
Talk:Shrek (sheep)

message: Is this still a current event? --Candlewicke Consortiums Limited 20:31, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No.-gadfium 20:45, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I would argue that it was never really an event anyway.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.89.206.18 (talk) 23:47, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

text: It wasn't considered important news here either. It was a "human interest story" (yet more proof that I'm not human - I wasn't at all interested). Grutness...wha? 00:26, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: The children's board book "One Sneaky Sheep" tells the story of a sheep named Nigel who evades the farmer because his coat is too beautiful to sheer. If my web search is right, the book is not related to Shrek.  AndrewHZ (talk) 21:40, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Book

message: The sources for the article are inconsistent. They say Shrek was nine or ten years old when he was sheared in April 2004, and that he was sheared again on his tenth birthday in November 2006. These dates are approximately 30 months apart. Clearly, he can't have been ten years old on both dates. Perhaps the age of a sheep cannot be readily determined and the media/owners were simply guessing an age for him. Thanks to Grant for pointing this out.-gadfium 03:53, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Inconsistency

message: Doesn't look much like him, perhaps because he is shorn and cleaner than usual; what do you think?
:Follow the photo to its flickr page and read the comments underneath. Schwede66 22:43, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the photo Shrek?
Talk:Early Jurassic

message: AMK152 proposed in edits of 27 December 2006 a geotimebox for this article.  I feel that the box information that is appropriate for the article is already contained in the footer, and that other information can be supplied where important, by links from the text.   See discussion at Template talk:Geotimebox. --Bejnar 20:31, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[User:AMK152|AMK152's]] Geotimeboxes

message: One problem with a focus on the British lower Jurassic ie the Lias, is that the article does not then present a balanced global view on the topic of the article title. cheers Geopersona (talk) 20:07, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lias
Talk:Revenue Act of 1916

message: The following material appeared on Emergency Revenue Act of 1916, a page I redirected to this one.  Based on (many) other pages created by the same author, User:Eucharistman, this material is probably accurate, but is unsourced.  Posted here for future reference.  
Meant to “soak the rich,” it raised the Underwood rate but eliminated payroll taxes.  Southern and Mid-Western Populist Democrats intended to make sure that if there was no alternative but to acquiesce in the President’s Preparedness Program, big businesses, which they suspected of secretly hoping for war, would pay for it.  To quote Rep. Warren Worth Bailey (D) of Pennsylvania: “If the forces of big business are to plunge this country into a saturnalia of extravagance for war purposes in a time of peace, it is my notion that the forces of big business should put up the money.”  The act doubled the normal income tax rate from 1% to 2%, and established a munitions profits tax of 12.5% on gross receipts of net profits of 10% or higher.  It was progressive in that for the 1st time it established an estate tax of 10% on incomes higher than $50,000.  It raised surtaxes on incomes over $40,000 from 6% to a maximum of 10%, and increased the surtaxes on incomes over $20,000 to a maximum of 13% which, with the normal tax rate of 2%, set the maximum income tax at 15%.  It also created the Tariff Commission to collect expert information for Congress on the “administrative, fiscal, and industrial effects” of U.S. tariff laws.  It was passed to give the government added revenue in the event of war, and it raked in more than $250 million.  It did get rid of the stamp and telephone taxes contained in the Emergency Internal Revenue Act of 1914.
--Lockley (talk) 04:21, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Text from merged page

message: This Act was passed in September 1916.  The US entered the war in April 1917.  Not sure what to make of that.  Andrew Gradman talk/WP:Hornbook 20:04, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The entry of the United States into World War I greatly increased the need for revenue."
Talk:National Board of Review: Top Ten Films

message: Shouldn't this list cite a source/reference, per WP:V? - Walkiped (T | C) 00:06, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What's the source?

message: Somebody is vandalizing this page by putting the movie Die Hard in every year's list over and over again.  Please do something about it!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.79.75.159 (talk) 09:54, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: A user has also vandalized the best films of 2012 by inserting The Dark Knight Rises over Argo. H.AFI.17 (talk) 15:25, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism!

message: Most of the films are preceded by a "#".  I wonder what it means?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pdgillen (talk • contribs) 15:53, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  #? 

message: I noticed that the list for 2007 had 11 entries, so I checked the National Board of Review's official site and they did not list Atonement as one of their top 10 films. In fact, they didn't recognize it for anything, thus I'm removing it from the list here.
S. Luke (talk) 05:33, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007 

message: National Board Review selected the best films as early as 1920 ("Top 40"): https://archive.org/details/widsyearbook192100wids/page/227/mode/1up Maybe a mention should be made in this article? StjepanHR (talk) 00:47, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  1920 films 

message: For some reason news sources say RR was in the top ten, but for some reason Spider-man is in here 2A02:C7E:401C:9400:8046:70F7:A7EA:1B5 (talk) 18:50, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Red Rocket
Talk:Turgesius

message: I've tried to revise the article, sorting out inconsistencies (where possible) using the link http://www.nalanda.nitc.ac.in/resources/english/etext-project/history/ireland/book-2chapter2.html, which appears to have provided the wource of much of the original article's material.  That document is unable to give any definitive account of the death of Turgesius so I've set out a couple of the possibilities. Tt 225 23:25, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Revision

message: See talk:Thorgest for discussion. Finnrind 13:03, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposing merger with [[Thorgest]]

message: How can he have founded Drogheda in 911 if he died in 845. What's going on here? Retroplum (talk) 16:47, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  845 and 911
Talk:Late Jurassic

message: AMK152 proposed in edits of 27 December 2006 a geotimebox for this article.  I feel that the box information that is appropriate for the article is already contained in the footer, and that other information can be supplied where important, by links from the text.   See discussion at Template talk:Geotimebox. --Bejnar 20:35, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[User:AMK152|AMK152's]] Geotimeboxes
Talk:Revenue Act of 1932

message: The text of the Act linked in the footnote is heavily redacted, which is in keeping with the focus of this article. However this article is linked from the Fuel Taxes article and the section dealing with the tax on gasoline is part of the missing material. The full text of the Act (including the missing sections) can be found at http://legisworks.org/sal/47/stats/STATUTE-47-Pg169b.pdf, so perhaps changing the link in the footnote would be good. 68.207.123.27 (talk) 19:01, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Footnote
Talk:Revenue Act of 1935

message: Needs discussion of impact of bill, evaluation of effectiveness.
Nothing about the tremendous success of this bill?  How it lifted millions out of poverty while punishing those who had profited from the financial meltdown of the great depression?  One would think it was a bill about curb setbacks or drainage standardization.
-G (talk) 14:09, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Claiborne Pell Newport Bridge

message: I'm not a regular at this article, so will leave it to others to place or not place this new image. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 06:52, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: New image needing placement

message: In particular, this statement "Before the bridge, Jamestown was a "summer-resident town" accessible only by ferry," is false - the Jamestown Bridge was built in 1940. 131.128.199.211 (talk) 15:24, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Impact on the Region" section could be improved