lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Cultural depictions of tuberculosis

message: In the deletion discussion linked above, User:Orlady suggested that this article be renamed tuberculosis in literature and art.  I think that cultural depictions of tuberculosis might be a better/more descriptive title.  Thoughts? -- Visviva 15:44, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: @Visviva @Orlady Almost 15 years later, I have moved the article as you proposed :) The previous name (Tuberculosis in human culture) was not consistent with most similar articles (also, the word human is pretty redundant). Tuberculosis in culture would be fine too, but again, I think "Cultural depictions of Foo" are more common than "Foo in culture". Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:41, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename? 

message: Beth died of congestive heart failure in the books, a common after-effect of Scarlet Fever. She did not have consumption. Reynardo (talk) 03:40, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Little Women
Talk:Sleeps with Butterflies

message: Thanks, PEJL, for changing this from "Sleeps with butterflies" to "Sleeps with Butterflies". When I created this page I inadvertently did so with the wrong capitalization and could not figure out how to rectify it.--Pisceandreams 15:56, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem. --PEJL 07:18, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Capitalization
Wikipedia talk:Requests for checkuser/Case/Bason0

message: : yeah, those are my other ID.  but, i do not act like 2 people. also, i did not discussion like other people. or protect my second ID i do not violation any rule. do you understand Sock puppetry mean?
: to admin. i report to this guy to 3rr violation. 
:*Three-revert rule violation on many page. i already warn his talk page.: Time reported: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Watermint
:* 
:* 
:* 
:* 
:* 
:he did not obey alphabetical order. dokdo's "d" is ahead of takeshima's "t". and this island governed by korea gov. also, korean people residence there. no japanese in that island.  this island contolled by korea gov. japan is just "claim". 
:in japan, they can't go to dokdo by ship and airplane. (they need permit by korea gov.) but korea can. i already metioned this to article's discussion page.
: 
:so, his change is clearly out of neutral point of view. i already warn him.
:also, he insert false information at . 
:he did not obey alphabetical order, and that image is not fishline.
: Please see Liancourt Rocks, 2005 in Japan, Korea, Usan-do. and many edit of his korea relation edit. This user Watermint has engaged in seriously edit war.Bason1 12:01, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

message: * :Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Bason0
* :Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Bason0
* Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Bason0
* Requests for IP check - Bason0 and anons at 11:58, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Known sockpuppet of Bason0
Template talk:Vishnu temples

message: Swamithope is neither famouse nor a Vishnu temple????!!!
A festival in Swamithope was celebrated with a holiday for thee districts. Is there any other Temple festival which is celebrated with holiday(other than local holiday)? Then see this link. It was among top seven. 
Is it not a Vishnu Temple? see this link. Ayya Vaikundar was the Avatar of Vishnu as per the scripture Akilam. Can you deny? - white dot...!!! 16:01, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Swamithope is not a famouse Vishnu temple. So removing it.--Redtigerxyz (talk) 11:17, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Take a look into the citations 4,5,6,7 of this article. The Car festival here attracts crowd from two states. Another festival in Swamithope (Ayya Vaikunda Avataram) was celebrated with a holiday for three districts. Is there any other Temple festival which is celebrated with holiday(other than local holiday)? - 117.97.139.0 (talk) 21:19, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

text:  Akilam is not a mainstream Hindu scripture, but a Ayyavazhi scripture. Even if a Vishu temple, Swamithope is not a famous' one. So removing it--Redtigerxyz (talk) 04:58, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Please note the reference provided above, and considering them Swamithope couldn't be argued as 'a place of no major impact' or not famous. - White Dot...!!!® 17:05, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

text:  The title is "Famous Vishnu temples", so only major ones must be included. --Redtigerxyz (talk) 04:00, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Swamithoppe

message: Just a question, but can't "famous" be seen as POV The World 00:44, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: It would be better to include temples state wise in India and make a separate Template for Divyadesams. Vishnu Temples doesn't mean Divya desams alone. The current form seems to be misleading. agasthyathepirate(talk) 09:00, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Support.Ssriram mt (talk) 15:19, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vishnu Temples may not include only Divya desams
Talk:European Syriac Union

message: I believe that European Siriac Union has nothing to see with the pro-KKK party GBH and that is a confussion with the Beth-Nahrain National Council.--83.33.219.234 (talk) 17:57, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: According to this , there was no downfall of the Mesopotamian Council, but instead ropean Syriac Union is a branch under the former. Is this correct? If so, then this needs to be fixed in the article. Chaldean (talk) 21:17, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Not clear
Talk:Dinosaur Jr. discography

message: Yes, I added an intro and a picture. Trying to model this article after other featured discography articles. Connör (talk) 15:46, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  inrto and pic 

message: Im removing it. Since I added an intro and picture, I think it no longer needs the tag. All it needs now is to cite sources, which i will take care of next. Connör (talk) 15:48, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ok, and that is done as well. this should probably be nominated for GA Connör (talk) 16:02, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  clean-up tag 
Talk:List of mountain peaks of California

message: Great list! And someone finally figured out how to directly link to NGS datasheets: THANK YOU!
Shouldn't this article (and similar ones) be named List of mountains in California ? hike395 05:12, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This article contains four sortable tables of mountain peaks.  List articles should ideally contain a single ordered list with perhaps some annotation.  --Buaidh 17:10, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: Great list but it is missing Mammoth Mountain, which should be both in elevation at 11.053 ft. and prominence at about 3.000 ft.
:Thanks, good catch.  Mammoth Mountain should be #29 on the elevation list, although it misses the prominence and isolation lists.  Yours aye,  Buaidh  15:42, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Mammoth Mountain

message: How come Mokelumne Peak seems to be completely missing from WP? Not "major" somehow?  Dicklyon (talk) 04:53, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mokelumne Peak 

message: New York Mountain is on the list but it is in Colorado. It's currently listed as #31 under, "The 50 most topographically prominent summits of California"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Mountain
2600:1700:7A51:10B0:B13E:688C:D8C2:A5D5 (talk) 15:44, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  New York Mountain is in Colorado 

message: Mount Muir is missing from the list. I'm not certain if this is deliberate or not, but Muir is a distinct separate summit nearly a mile south of Mount Whitney, and it is over 14,000 feet. Seems like it should be here. Lizardite (talk) 18:51, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: To be on the list, a peak must have at least 500m of topographic prominence. Mount Muir has 91m. — hike395 (talk) 13:27, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Mt Muir
Talk:Lombard Wikipedia

message: I went to the Lombard Wikipedia, browsed some Random Pages and all of them looked auto-generated by bots. There were cities in Italy, Catalonia and USA, a bunch of airports and articles about numbers.
Can anyone give a list of bots that were used on that Wikipedia? Otherwise "over 50,000" articles is quite misleading.
Don't get me wrong: I'm all for development of regional languages, and i sincerely mean the best to this developing Wikipedia. --Amir E. Aharoni 16:14, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I suggest you to contact it:Utente:Remulazz, he's mostly present on the italian wikipedia, so you can easily find him there. --Italian Viper (talk) 16:33, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bots 

message: An anonymous user removed notability and sources tags, saying that notability and sources are the same as for other Wikipedias. This is wrong: Wikipedias in many languages have been covered specifically by secondary sources. AFAIK this can't be said about the Lombard Wikipedia. Please correct me if i'm wrong by adding sources, not by removing tags. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 21:54, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability and sources
Talk:Completely Fair Scheduler

message: I guess the O(log n) CFS was introduced to the Linux kernel for performance improvements compared to the older O(1) scheduler, the computational resource compared being number of clock cycles/time. Yet, there should be a minimum number of processes (n) for which the performance of the O(log n) scheduler starts getting worse compared to a rather high-overhead, but still constant scheduler. Maybe this is for currently pathological examples, like thousands of processes. Can anyone say a few words about this? Thanks, --Abdull (talk) 08:20, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually the main reason for the new scheduler was not "performance" (e.g. scheduler overhead), but fairness. When CFS was first merged to mainline, it was actually slower than the O(1) scheduler even at low loads. However, compared to everything else that needs doing, scheduler overhead is usually insignificant. CFS has also been optimized since then, so it's possible that it's faster than the old scheduler now. But I don't know of any precise measurements of this. -- intgr [talk] 15:06, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  O(1) vs. O(log n) performance 

message: Sorry for the terrible commit message, accidentally pressed enter while still typing it. Meant to say: CFS was not inspired by BFS, nor could it have been -- BFS was begun over 2 years after CFS (August 2009 vs April 2007). As Molnár's email says, it was inspired by Kolivas's Staircase Deadline scheduler. See https://lwn.net/Articles/230574/. -- simxp (talk) 14:38, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverting BFS edit ('RV wrong eid)')
Category talk:Atheist theologians

message: There are very few articles in this category. It is debatable whether a category called atheist theologians is required. The Category Religious naturalists would be better. --613kpiggy (talk) 16:10, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

message: Surely Thomas J.J. Altizer should go here? ACEOREVIVED (talk) 23:24, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Altizer

message: Should Bart D. Ehrman be added to this list? Rollo August (talk) 19:17, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Bart D. Ehrmann
Talk:Jim Finney

message: There's a report of his death here but the exact date is not reported.  I'll edit the article now but it will need updating if there's a better report.--82.18.164.248 (talk) 05:41, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. I have moved the death reference to the bottom, as it is not an approved part of an article lead-in (introduces subject, establishes notability - dying isn't notable!) and tidied up a little. Thanks again. Ref (chew)(do) 21:09, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Death
Talk:Donald Trump's Real Estate Tycoon

message: If there's anything that makes this game notable, it's that it features a real-life entrepreneur. As for sources, I think that can be applied. For some reason, those who have editing this page didn't bother to put any. FoxLad (talk) 01:11, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Notability is not inherited Donald Trump's name on the software carries no weight when it come to the notability requirements. I agree no one put references in the article, mostly because there are almost no reliable sources about it. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 04:17, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: On the page, it simply says that this game was released for 'Mobile'. Clicking the link simply leads to the page for 'Mobile devices'.
Does anyone know what platforms the game was released for? 
76.164.146.89 (talk) 23:41, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The N-Gage QD was one of them. I added that to the page. Also, it seems that mobile devices and mobile phones are two separate things. The sources say it was released for mobile phones, so I changed that as well. AJFU (talk) 14:19, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification of mobile platforms 

message: I edited the lede of the article about 3 days ago to reflect the fact that Trump was a future U.S. president. These edits were reverted by , citing the rationale: "Not the case when the game was released, Trump became president this year, not in 2000." 
I countered with "No reason to not state that Trump was a future U.S. president. See Trump: The Art of the Deal, Trump: Surviving at the Top, and Trump: The Art of the Comeback. It would be inconsistent not to state the fact." 
Two days later, Lordtobi reverted my edits again, this time stating: "The game did not influence his presidency and vice versa. WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS on other pages, rather it should be removed there as well." Lordtobi then proceeded to remove statements that Donald Trump was a future U.S. president on Trump: The Art of the Deal, Trump: Surviving at the Top, and Trump: The Art of the Comeback, citing the same rationale.
I would like to generate a consensus on how to proceed here. CatcherStorm talk  05:57, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mentioning the fact that Trump is a future US president
Talk:Sonata for Solo Violin (Bartók)

message: This article needs to be renamed Sonata for Solo Violin (Bartok) or Sonata for Solo Violin (Bartók). Consensus? This won't do, however. Wikipedia:Naming conventions (pieces of music) - there are sufficiently many notable works by this name, the Bartók not the most famous by a wide margin as in the case of the Bach Mass in B minor for instance. So disambiguation is necessary from the start, not as an afterthought. Schissel | Sound the Note! 16:28, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I moved it. I hadn't even heard of this sonata before today though (although I'm not a Bartók fan at all, I've heard of almost all of his works). —  $PЯINGεrαgђ  18:52, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Mary Saunderson

message: We have two articles on the same lady. --Kleinzach (talk) 22:36, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge. Wrad (talk) 22:39, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, but in which direction? --Kleinzach (talk) 15:00, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone already merged them here because this version has more google hits. Wrad (talk) 16:07, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Mary Saunderson]] or [[Mary Betterton]]?
Talk:Naxos (city)

message: After a week on Naxos, in Naxos, I am still slightly confused as to the actual name of "the big city to the north of the island". Is it called "Naxos" or "Hora" (also sometimes spelled "Chora")?
From what I can google, it seems that "Hora" is generally used for "the biggest city" (capital?) on greek islands. So is it more like a term like village, town, city etc. describes a city rather than a name?
This section from the begining of the article only adds to the confusion:
Naxos City (Greek: Νάξος; Italian: Nasso; Turkish: Nakşa) is the capital of the Greek island, Naxos. [...]
The largest town is Hora, sometimes called Naxos City, with 6,533 inhabitants (2001 census). The main villages are Vivlos, Agios Arsenios, Glinado, Galanado, Melanes, and Kinidaros.
The second paragraph seems more to describe the Island of Naxos rather than the city, even though this article is, specifically, about the city. And it seems inconsistent first to refer to the city as "Naxos City", and next as "Hora".
--Mukke (talk) 19:29, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:New Democratic Party candidates in the 2008 Canadian federal election

message: I updated the candidates for Ottawa-Vanier and Ottawa South on the page. Athena18 16:38, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:New Democratic Party of Canada candidates, 2011 Canadian federal election which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 02:31, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bev Collins. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Bearcat (talk) 16:37, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Bev Collins" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:ISO 25178

message: References in the areal surface roughness literature to "watersheds" (plural) method may be specific to articles translated from the French. In English, the common term for the image processing technique is "watershed" (singular), and the article now links to the existing article on watershed segmentation. -174.63.125.43 (talk) 18:23, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: "Watersheds method"

message: I have deleted a commercial link that was not relevant (just advertising).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.251.62.109 (talk) 07:42, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The section on the new areal parameters is missing several parameters, including the fractal parameters and the surface versions of the profile parameters defined in ISO 13565-2,-3.  Also, can anyone lend any insight onto where the line is drawn regarding respecting copyright of the ISO publication? --Wikeithpedia (talk) 19:59, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: What do you mean by "where the line is drawn regarding respecting copyright of the ISO publication"? Wizard191 (talk) 20:34, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, ISO has a copyright on the standard itself.  Standard documents are usually both concise and technical, and so it can be difficult to accurately extract their content without quoting verbatim.  One clear example are mathematical formulas.  I am new to this whole area of copyright, and I don't understand it.  (For instance, I don't understand how a law that allows copyright of mathematical formulas cannot logically lead to some nonsensical situations.)  So I have been erring on the side of caution: under the assumption that any information already published here must have already been approved (by someone more expert than I am) for publication, I've only edited existing information in this article that I found to be inaccurate; I have not added any new information.  But I would like to add new information.  So I would appreciate any guidance anyone might have regarding legally/ethically publishing information about technical standards such as those from ISO. --Wikeithpedia (talk) 15:05, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I understand your difficulty as most reliable sources (RS) are well written and concise. However we cannot copy them verbatim as that is a copyright issue. Instead we must "put it in our own words" while maintaining the same meaning. It can be tough at times, but I'm sure you are up to the task. For Wikipedia policies and guidelines on the matter see: WP:PLAGIARISM and WP:COPYVIO. Wizard191 (talk) 16:04, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing parameters
Talk:List of tallest buildings in Pittsburgh

message: Market St.⧏  ⧐ Diamond Way 18:26, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes

message: To save time for myself, I won't go into any detail just yet, I know this was a fairly substantial revision, so please feel free to place any questions or requests for further improvement below. 
𝒬𝔔 23:57, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent Overhaul
Talk:List of tallest buildings in Nashville

message: If you are editing this Article, please, as a courtesy to others (including myself), add sources to anything you change up to add in this article in order for your information to be CREDIBLE. Otherwise, people should report any vandalism to an administrator (I myself am not one). 
With any sources on the page (I'll try to clean it up later), please make sure the sources are recent (~5 yrs max) for each building. 
Thanks a bunch
- Lchader  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lchader (talk • contribs) 18:06, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Friendly Reminder... 

message: This is a rather dubious claim.  What is the significance of 236'?
"There are at least 20 additional high rises in Nashville between 236 feet and 299 feet tall that are not shown here. When these are added to the towers standing 300 feet and above, Nashville has more high rises than much larger metros such as Austin and Charlotte."
In the Austin list of tallest buildings there are 25 buildings listed as being between 200' and 299' tall.
Additionally, if one were to search Emporis there are literally dozens of additional buildings in Austin 150' or taller, all of which are classified as high rises.
I will not do the homework for Charlotte, but until proven otherwise with sources this claim should be removed. 66.69.226.193 (talk) 00:04, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Claim made in "Tallest buildings" 

message: I strongly encourage those who continue to feel the need to engage in city boosterism, and make unfounded claims to find another outlet.  Wikipedia is not the place for this nonsense.  Unverified claims comparing one city against another does not positively contribute to any article. 66.69.226.193 (talk) 16:07, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not to beat a dead horse, but... 

message: Where is the Omni Hotel on this list? Gdw1948 (talk) 05:54, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Omni Hotel
Talk:The Dub Room Special (soundtrack)

message: It says "Inca Roots" on the Zappa.com page for this CD.
Either it's a typo or a subtle name change to reflect something-or-other (like Pink Napkins, Chunga's Basement, etc.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chickyraptor (talk • contribs)  16:54, 9 August 2007
: You are right! So until otherwise is known it should say "Roots" in the article.--HJensen, talk 20:44, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  According to this Forum, , "Roots" is a website typo, so it should be "Inca Roads".--HJensen, talk 21:08, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  The typo on the Barfko-Swill listing has been fixed.  Chickyraptor 02:37, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Hans Hertell

message: Puerto Rico can sign international treaties under the supervision of the United States. Please see this recent article on a treaty signed in 2009 with the Dominican Republic.. Hertell was present with Calderon at the signing of the treaty to repatriate illegal aliens. --XLR8TION (talk) 03:02, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Treaty Info

message: I have protected the article from further editing until I look over the situation later during the day. Only after a decision is reached will the page be unprotected. In the meantime, all issues will discussed in this talk page. Tony the Marine (talk) 19:06, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Protected

message: The page protected will be lifted. Both, User:XLR8TION and User:Wdouglas2, were notified to participate in the above discussion, see:  here and here. They were given enough time to participate and User:XLR8TION did while User:Wdouglas2 did not, therefore it is assumed that my suggestion as been accepted. Once implemented into the main article it is assumed that any further editing to the contrary will be considered as vandalism. Tony the Marine (talk) 22:34, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Unprotect and conclusion