lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:IMDb link templates

message: Please visit Template talk:Imdb name to discuss new capabiliy provided by  with a demonstration at . Thank you. – Conrad T. Pino 08:34, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template:Imdb name proposed edit 

message: Please visit Template talk:Imdb title to discuss new capabiliy provided by  with a demonstration at . Thank you. – Conrad T. Pino 08:34, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template:Imdb title proposed edit 

message: Please see Wikipedia talk:Identifying reliable sources#IMDB as a source? for a discussion about establishing a policy, guideline or central discussion on IMDB. Maurreen (talk) 03:40, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Discussion is now archived at Wikipedia talk:Identifying reliable sources/Archive_25#IMDB as a source?.--NapoliRoma (talk) 15:14, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  IMDB as a source? 

message: The IMDb has tons of events listed , so should these be made to work in the template? Sure would come in handy for awards programs.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.194.66.47 (talk) 22:16, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  IMDb Event? 

message: There are numerous articles on specific seasons of various TV shows, but most if not all have an external link that points to the show entry for the entire series. Worthwhile or is there another way to link to a season? --SCalhotrod (Talk) ☮ღ☺ 16:45, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  IMDb Season? 

message: …for discussion, , the removal of just the one template that allows easy linking to IMDB biographies. Reasoning: These are inappropriate personal, self-published information sources, rather than valid, WP:VERIFY-approved, independent, referreed/edited, and formally published sources of biographical information. We need to make the poorest manners of WP writing less easy to accomplish, not easier. Cheers. Le Prof 50.129.227.141 (talk) 14:08, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: I am proposing here

message: Why do we allow imdbname:... as an interwiki link. Doesn't this just encourage the use of IMDb as an inappropriate external link? WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:33, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I just noticed an article attempting to include such an external link inline, and was wondering the same... V2Blast (talk) 22:32, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm seeing this, too, for linking in filmographies to titles that do not have an article with imdbtitle:.... Is this okay or should this be discouraged/avoided or prohibited, but allowed for use in External links sections? – 108.56.139.120 (talk) 22:33, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why imdbname?
Talk:Sticky rice in bamboo

message: according to GNS,
Wikipedia:Requested_articles/Social_sciences/Geography,_cities,_regions_and_named_places/Kosovo/Region_04#Kraljane
this is also a place in Kosovo.
thansk,
mike
James Michael DuPont (talk) 14:45, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  place in kosovo 
Talk:Poikilocytosis

message: It would be nice if the echinocyte link actually went somewhere.  Can we just add a stub in the meantime to show echinocytes/burr cells are found in TTP/HUS?  71.234.109.192 08:41, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  burr cells 

message: What about anisopoikilocytosis? This is a form of poikilocytosis as well, and I feel it should be mentioned on this page. Dryphi (talk) 03:30, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anisopoikilocytosis 

message: What happens when you have anisocytosis and poikilocytosis Sarafagastya8 (talk) 07:56, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anisocytosis
Talk:Constitutional convention (Philippines)

message: Do we need four separate articles?  Maybe we should combine People's Initiative, Constitutional Convention (Philippines), and Constituent Assembly (Philippines), into Constitutional reform in the Philippines. --Bruce Hall (talk) 04:24, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging 
File talk:1933 Nobel Peace Prize awarded to Norman Angell.JPG

message: I didn't mean to make this into such a huge dispute ... I was only suggesting that someone could maybe send an email to the Nobel Foundation and ask them about using the image in Wikipedia. It seems to take 2-3 weeks for a reply.  But since it looks like no one here is volunteering to do that, I'll just do it. –panda 15:49, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Panda, I think that that would be self-defeating. The Nobel Foundation isn't going to condone the using of an image like this even if it is entirely legal to use. Remember, it is not prudent from them to grant permission with unknown third parties. It would be naive to expect a response like "Sure, feel free to use our trademark however you want." There are always serious implications for them dealing with unknown third parties. There is discussion on this image in several places now and only a single user has argued viehemently against its use. I also can't believe it has come to this point.  aNubiSIII (T / C) 16:33, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

text: Can't hurt though. What was/is the response? Monads (talk) 22:28, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The Nobel Foundation claims that the Nobel medals are copyrighted in the US and registered trademarks in the US.  See  and Talk:Nobel Prize for further discussion about this.  –panda (talk) 23:35, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Email the Nobel Foundation

message: #Please see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions#Nobel Prize (R) Medal images.  Thank you. --NYScholar (talk) 01:06, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Updates
Talk:Leader of the Liberal Party (UK)

message: Was he an official full leader or formally just an acting leader? Timrollpickering 09:14, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Grimond in 1976
Talk:List of Bollywood Movies inspired from English Movies

message: After seeing some english & hindi movies , i realised some similarities between them. Here are some of the hindi movies inspired from english movies.
NOTE--Most of the films i have watched myself and most of the comments in the relation section are mine only.
Angelofheaven 15:38, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That is WP:OR and that is my point. Please remove the OR from the article. Toddstreat1 15:41, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: But i am against it
1. 'Bollywood films and plagiarism' concentrate on all kind of plagiarism including copy of other indian language films .But my topic is concerning only international english films .
2. 'Bollywood films and plagiarism' mainly concentrate on 'plagiarism' in bollywood. But some bollywood movies do have copy of scenes or characters of hollywood movies, yet they donot come under 'plagiarism'. My topic covers those movies also as it uses the word 'inspired' instead of 'plagiarism'. 
3. 'Bollywood films and plagiarism' does not give relations b/w english & hindi movies.
4. 'Bollywood films and plagiarism' title is not so much reachable(according to my view)to normal people who doesnot know more  about 'plagiarism'.
Angelofheaven 09:59, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I understand what you are saying, but some of the movies you are mentioning are already listed in the other article. What if you create a new section in the other article with the title "Inspired from English movies" or whatever and redirect people from this article to the new section of the existing one? There often is a grey area between inspiration and plagiarism with an fluent transition. Actually I just found the other article by searching for your new one. Please also post your objections at the other talk page. Regards Tirkfltalk 11:02, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

text: I am re-adding the merge template as Angelofheaven cannot decide this unilaterally. Please do not remove it without consensus.  Toddstreat1 14:50, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge issue with  'Bollywood films and plagiarism'
Talk:Norwich City F.C. Hall of Fame

message: In line with other entries at :Category:Association football museums and halls of fame, I suggest this is renamed Norwich City F.C. Hall of Fame. --Dweller (talk) 10:28, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed rename 
Talk:The Dangerous Days of Daniel X

message: What are the other books in this series going to be called, and when are they coming out? There are obviously going to be more, because of the sections at the end that have a few chapters of what will come next. So why isn't it mentioned in the article that there are going to be sequels, even if the titles and release dates aren't known yet? We can still say there will be sequels, can't we?
Mollymoon (talk) 18:25, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Next Books? 

message: What does Milo Ventimiglia have to do with this book? He's mentioned as part of Jodi L. Israel's review in the Literary significance and reception section.
Mollymoon (talk) 18:27, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Milo Ventimiglia
Talk:Market value

message: who is a willing buyer?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.43.133.80 (talk) 13:15, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Willing buyer?

message: Someone is trying to sell me a truck through you using money order 108.36.118.219 (talk) 20:43, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Truck
Template talk:Euskal Herria provinces

message: I reverted all your modifications from yesterday for two different reasons :
* "Southern Basque country" is not equivalent to Basque Country (autonomous community) (since it includes Navarre too) ;
* I don't see any reason to use Basque names rather than English ones (see Talk:Basque people for a similar discussion. French Tourist 10:14, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert from mods by [[User:Deibid]]
Talk:Redeeming Love

message: It's as if this article was abandoned midway through creation! AshleyScripter {talkback} 19:38, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What happened here? 

message: I love this book and would recommend it to everyone! This is really a story of "redeeming love" that is only provide by our Heavenly Father. It is truly the heart of God to break down barriers in order to draw us near to him.  Patricia New (talk) 04:28, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Great Book
Talk:Rasputin (Card novel)

message: Old (incorrect) html-link: index.shtml
New updated link (not an html-page): OSC Publications List.pdf
But I'm not sure if it's allowed (certainly not recommended) to have an external link to a (external) file Clockworkske (talk) 13:58, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External link (bibliography) not up to date
Talk:Chelmsford Royal Commission

message: This section is in violation with the following Wikipedia policies:
WP:NPOV
WP:FRINGE 
WP:DUE
WP:V
Section violates NPOV and FRINGE, which says that “In Wikipedia parlance, the term fringe theory is used in a very broad sense to describe an idea that departs significantly from the prevailing views or mainstream views in its particular field. Because Wikipedia aims to summarize significant opinions with representation in proportion to their prominence, a Wikipedia article should not make a fringe theory appear more notable or more widely accepted than it is. Statements about the truth of a theory must be based upon independent reliable sources. If discussed in an article about a mainstream idea, a theory that is not broadly supported by scholarship in its field must not be given undue weight,[1] and reliable sources must be cited that affirm the relationship of the marginal idea to the mainstream idea in a serious and substantial manner.” 
Because of this, the edit also violates WP:DUE. The ramifications of and the historical body of knowledge on the Chelmsford Royal Commission are covered in the earlier parts of the article, which would be better fleshed out, because these are represented by the larger body of resources outside the Steve Cannane book. It skews the article to another direction which was not represented at all before the new “Legacy” section. The title of this section is also misleading. 
The section
“In Australian Writer Susan Gaeson's unpublished manuscript; Dark Trance, she reflects on a conversation she had with Ron Segal; the former president of the Australian Wing of the Citizens Commission on Human Rights, a Scientology affiliated organisation. In which he told Gaeson that he "was the mastermind behind the operation. It was he who decided to put Rosa into Chelmsford undercover” is not verifiable with the source: https://web.archive.org/web/20180302160356/http://www.susangeason.com/darktrance.html
This is not mentioned there at all.Coffeebreak80s (talk) 23:24, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
Talk:Child psychopathology

message: Assignment 9/12-I am a student participating in the Wikipedia Initiative for Psychology and was assigned to offer some suggestions on how to improve this page. I do suggest that more structure and fluidity be applied to this article. Wikipedia is designed to educate people of every education level. Therefore, simple and organized paragraphs would be more efficient. The diagnostic process discussing the DSM should be in its own paragraph, explaining how the DSM is used in regards to child psychological disorders. Irrelevant information is written under certain sections, such as the information under Treatment. A lot of that information could go into a paragraph discussing the differences in child psychopathology between genders.  BKeehan001 (talk) 00:23, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Child Psychopathology 

message: Parents are considered a reliable source of information because they spend more time with children than any other adult. A child's psychopathology can be connected to parental behaviors. Clinicians and researchers have experienced problems with children's self-reports and rely on adults to provide the information.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ballerbj (talk • contribs) 01:18, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition to Research and Theories 

message: A merge proposal including this article has been proposed. Join the discussion! --Xurizuri (talk) 08:40, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It's closed. --Xurizuri (talk) 09:29, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: — Assignment last updated by Racoon dolphin (talk) 08:43, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Gender, Race and Computing
Talk:Chinese Classification of Mental Disorders

message: What a great little article - found this very useful  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.83.142.156 (talk) 12:58, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Great! 
Talk:Copycat crime

message: The most obvious candidates for this article are these mass killings. Plenty of evidence of imitation in them, and well  covered in Loren Cunningham's 'The Copycat Effect' and Robert Cialdini's 'Influence: Science and Practice'.  Perhaps we could add the evidence for this category of crime being imitative? ChrisPer (talk) 05:28, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  School shootings and 'going postal' mass killings 
Talk:Cross-cultural psychiatry

message: I think this is a good start for an article; it's interesting and makes a valid points that describe the article's scope. But it currently reads more like an essay (It does have citations so I'm not complaining) I just think it can be broken up into different sections that tackle different points embedded with the current body of text.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.31.10.11 (talk) 00:29, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

message: Ubuntu is a word meaning having heart i for one would like to see the whole world practise.It is an important thing in many african cultures while it is suppose to be known in the whole universe 41.246.28.198 (talk) 12:47, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  ubuntu
Talk:Dynamic psychiatry

message: I don't think this article could say anything that couldn't be said in psychodynamics--Anonymaus (talk) 11:44, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe, but I hate it when Wikipedia confuses topics that have different meanings. Psychodynamics is the phenomenon, psychodynamic psychology is the study of the phenomenon, and psychodynamic psychiatry is the application of the study of the phonomenon to mental illness. One of the worst examples of such confusion leading to a very confusing outcome is Evolution which takes its topic as 'the theory of evolution', and then only considers one such theory. Evolution is the phenomenon, and there are, and have been, many theories. Once a topic is condensed like that, then editors argue for the exclusion of other theories on the grounds that they are not THE current theory. End result - there is nothing remotely resembling a satisfactory page on Evolution, the phenomenon. --Memestream (talk) 23:05, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Face time

message: Perhaps 'factors increasing/decreasing face time' gets at an interesting
dynamic, but as this article has developed, the section is being used as
a dumping ground for material of suspect relevance.  For example, while
Dyson and Negroponte may have studied face time, it serves their
contribution poorly to cite them as 'factors increasing face time'. 206.248.138.250 (talk) 05:31, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Sogod, Southern Leyte

message: 12.192.107.190 (talk) 20:32, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: Duplicate of below. —KuyaBriBriTalk 22:03, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 6 May 2014 

message: 12.192.107.190 (talk) 20:33, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. —KuyaBriBriTalk 22:03, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 6 May 2014 

message: 180.190.182.43 (talk) 14:39, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: as you have not requested a change.Please request your change in the form "Please replace XXX with YYY" or "Please add ZZZ between PPP and QQQ".Please also cite reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. - Arjayay (talk) 14:47, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 1 August 2017 

message: give me a little permission to makes some changes this article. HappyToHelp (talk) 18:18, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. The type of block for this article allows editors with accounts least four days old and at least ten edits to make changes.  If you meet those requirements, you will be able to edit it yourself.  Please note that any changes you wish to make must be supported by reliable sources that are included in the change.Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 19:32, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 14 October 2017
Talk:Intensive outpatient program

message: Article is currently poorly sourced to one article and a primary source, a link to a commercial website selling this treatment. Please help by adding secondary or tertiary sources, preferably to reputable medical citations, not tangentially associated with the article. Hopefully I will get a chance to look more closely and in the mean time, if this is a valid therapy, I invite editors with no conflict of interest to help improve this stub, because frankly as it stands it's an advert and should probably be deleted. Mramoeba (talk) 22:34, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poorly sourced
Talk:Frank Lake

message: *
:Austerlitz -- 88.75.203.240 (talk) 08:46, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Something new in here? 

message: we need clarification was it Vellore or Madras at this point in the story when Lake changed to psychiatric medecine MumbaiGlenPaesViolinStudent (talk) 14:03, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Christian Medical College Madras link goes back to CMC Vellore and not to CMC Madras
Talk:Life-process model of addiction

message: I wonder why Alcoholics Anonymous is listed here in the See Also section, as AA does not follow addiction as a life-process, but rather a disease. Oldefarquer (talk) 16:26, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've started a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine#Models of addiction as a neutral ground regarding this article and the  Disease model of addiction article. --Geniac (talk) 13:45, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion pointer 

message: Someone inserted the term "outdated" into the lead:
:: The life-process model of addiction is the an outdated view that addiction is not a disease but rather a habitual response and a source of gratification and security that can be understood only in the context of social relationships and experiences.
Has a consensus formed that this model is incorrect?  The Nestler citation doesn't seem to address this at all, never mentioning the words "disease" or "life".  Also, can a behavioral neuroscience question can be answered from a purely biological standpoint?  It's my understanding that biology and psychology are intertwined, and each can affect the other.  --Hirsutism (talk) 19:50, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Outdated"?
Talk:Madeline Levine

message: I work for the author's publisher and would like to propose that a bibliography section be added to this stub with all her books. Here is the information for that section, if this suggestion is deemed appropriate by the community.
Bibliography
— (1996). Viewing Violence. Doubleday ISBN 978-0385476867
— (1998). See No Evil: A Guide to Protecting Our Children from Media Violence. Jossey-Bass ISBN 978-0061824746
— (2006). The Price of Privilege, Harper ISBN 978-0060595845
— (2012). Teach Your Children Well. Harper ISBN 978-0061824746
— (2020). Ready or Not. Harper ISBN 978-0062657756 Jimhanas (talk) 15:31, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition of Bibliography Section
Talk:Max Fink

message: Articles
Max Fink has written hundreds of articles and chapters in books. It is not appropriate to list them all and why choose some? None of these look as if these are particularly relevant to his biography. At the moment it looks rather as if someone is trying to promote the work of D. Healy and TA Ban or Animula Publishing. If there is something that is particularly important to the biography of Max Fink, then it needs to go into the body of the article as a reference. For example it might be appropriate to add the last item on the list as a reference after the sentence "Early research included federal government funded research into the changes in brain waves (electroencephalogram) induced by electroshock, antidepressant and antipsychotic drugs, opiates and narcotic antagonists, and cannabis and metabolites." I don't know - I haven't read the article. Staug73 (talk) 12:07, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further reading