Talk:IRCnet

message: logo is wrong. compare ircnet.com (not related to the network, just fans) and ircnet.org  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.245.220.240 (talk) 19:12, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: That is not entirely correct. ircnet.com was run and endorsed by network administration as well as ordinary users. There was never an official website, whoever owned and managed a most credible website with a ircnet.* domain for the network had the advantage. --Aghors (talk) 15:56, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo 

message: "IRCnet mostly consists of Finnish communities." Could someone please verify this? Scoo 17:20, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Mostly Finnish users

message: sorry.testing  —Preceding unsigned comment added by AseanChat (talk • contribs) 11:12, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  test 

message: Plenty of sources exist, although many seem to be written for Nordic and German press outlets. Considering that this article's been flagged for a ref cleanup for over a year, I'd say it's overdue. Anyone feel expert enough to take it on? http://www.google.com.np/archivesearch?oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=com.ubuntu%3Aen-US%3Aunofficial&client=firefox-a&hl=en&q=IRCnet&ie=UTF-8 MrZaiustalk 16:48, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: Article tells IRCnet doesn't operate services to service channel or nicknames, but it has implemented mode +R since at least 2005, which allows OPs to set hosts for the network to reop, should the channel end up into OPless state.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.100.83.191 (talk) 20:01, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Me again. I added list of all services, but left the passage about +R be even if that's not a proper service from the network point of view. It's still in characteristics subtopic, even if that makes it look a bit messy.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.100.83.191 (talk) 19:32, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. It appears that one of Wikipedia's bots removed your addition because it contained what looks like email addresses.  Is the information you added available in a reliable source (non-blog, non-wiki, non-forum) anywhere? --Lexein (talk) 21:04, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: What about +R?

message: Do you think the info about bots being "generally prohibited" is still valid? I'm on several big channels that have bots, have had for years. This has been so at least from 2007.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.100.83.191  (talk)  16:39, 30 June 2011 
:Do you have to get approval, or do people just run them? Whatever info needs updating in te article, please provide a reliable source. Otherwise, just discuss it here. --Lexein (talk) 20:56, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Bots

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on IRCnet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110322175909/http://www.irchelp.org/irchelp/ircd/ircopguide.html to http://www.irchelp.org/irchelp/ircd/ircopguide.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:24, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified