lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Connecticut General Assembly

message: The article does not even say how long the Democrats have controlled the State Legislature in Connecticut.176.26.75.7 (talk) 09:42, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Not a very useful article

message: Someone should add to this entry. 163.192.21.43 15:49, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article says that an incumbant State Senator of Connecticut was elected on the Working Family Party. He is not listed in the seating chart. Why? --2602:306:39D6:CBA0:C879:E58B:DDBA:107E (talk) 03:12, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Working Family Party Not Listed
Talk:Jeffrey Cheah

message: would anyone just log on to wilipedia and search for tan sri jeffery cheah ? pls make this page useful insted of making it a "signiture book"
The author of the above comment may not possess English spelling skills or knowledge of Malaysian personalities. The entire article is correct in facts and is non-partisan in its content. This comment by Greg Barlow, Seremban, Malaysia  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.51.49.144 (talk) 13:05, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is a significant amount of conflict of interest editing going on. See contributions, Special:Contributions/175.143.107.237, Special:Contributions/Twnkle, Special:Contributions/Sunwayecomm. This prevents the article from being WP:NPOV. Some of the sources are also not independent. The whole article needs to be examined thoroughly. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 07:33, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict of interest editing 
Talk:Baltimore–Washington Superconducting Maglev Project

message: Why is this this page called "Baltimore-Washington D.C. Maglev"? Shouldn't be called the Northeast Maglev? The Washington-Baltimore maglev is just a section of the line.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:245:C101:6BCC:204C:CC51:3C77:46EC (talk) 20:03, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Renaming proposal

message: A prior author had misread the 2009 budget document.  The amounts given are in thousands of dollars. I have corrected this as well as changed the history to reflect the competition for federal demonstration funding rather than the Olympics being the original impetus for the project. Racepacket (talk) 03:44, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Maryland budget data
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/5 of spades

message: There is no reason for this article to be allowed to be continued it is about a card it might be more suitible for it to be under cards featured in a standard deck. So I believe this article should be deleted.
Has anybody seen the new James Bond film, Casino Royale?
The 5 of Spades plays an integral role in the outcome of the plot.
This is reason enough for this article to be reinstated.
LONG LIVE THE 5 of SPADES!
:::  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.156.134.149 (talk) 17:58, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
Template talk:Topheavy

message: I have edited this template in a way that makes it less POV.  The previous version essentially characterized text as strawman arguments.  Templates should not be used to characterize content in order to advance one side of a content dispute, even if the article may be unbalanced.  The Crow 15:56, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

message: Please list at WP:RM. Patstuarttalk|edits 21:08, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: Just wanted to use it for a section but couldn't.  Thanks. Carol Moore 13:08, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed.-Andrew c [talk] 17:02, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Should be article or section
Talk:Cross-Entropy Method

message: I'm confused as to why the text on User:Cross-Entropy Method is on a User Page rather than in article mainspace.  I would propose moving this to mainspace as Cross-Entropy Method.
Do you agree?
--Richard 15:57, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good idea. Do it. Encyclops 15:35, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Shanghai–Hangzhou maglev line

message: I have added a note to the article about the electro-magnetic radiation fears.  There is no scientific data cited about actual levels of radiation for Transrapid.   Transrapid and supporters categorically reject such claims and can cite measured fields to show it is groundless.  Without this the article tacitly lends credence to these claims.   The "fears" might have been real (so these reference can be left) but that does not mean the purported cause is real.
Tjej (talk) 03:03, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  electro-magnetic radiation fears 

message: This BBC article mentions a train travelling between Shanghai and Hangzhou, so it seems the  rail line is already built. Heroeswithmetaphors (talk) 12:52, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The BBC article refers to the Shanghai–Hangzhou High-Speed Railway. Ekem (talk) 15:19, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Aha! I'll add it over there then. Thanks! Heroeswithmetaphors (talk) 17:38, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: More clearly: In operation is the High-Speed link, i.e. "bullet train" with wheels. Maglev project was suspended. Tommasel (talk) 10:10, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  BBC article 

message: This article from the UK's Independent announced the opening of the line: http://www.independent.co.uk/travel/news-and-advice/china-opens-shanghaihangzhou-highspeed-rail-link-2116722.html
I was in the area one year ago (Nov. 2009) and saw the line under construction.  It's an above-ground line on pillars ranging from 20 to 40 feet in height depending on topography and obstacles.  One year ago there were only pillars in place for about half the distance between Hangzhou and Shanghai and a few short sections where they had begun putting concrete girders between the pillars.  It's mind-boggling to believe that they could have it finished and operating by now.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.244.232.254 (talk) 18:42, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rail line is open 
Talk:Swissmetro

message: Mere 12 minutes between Bern and Zurich by 500 kilometres per hour doesn't make any sense.
Shanghai Maglev Train reach 431 kmph (not test speed 501 kmph), but 30.5 km takes 7 minutes and 20 seconds, not 1 minute and 10 seconds. It is clear why. Tommasel (talk) 12:18, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. With a distance between Bern and Basel of 120km, a 12 min transit time implies an average speed of around 600km/h (which doesn’t take into consideration acceleration and deceleration time). I wonder where the math came from.Ferkjl (talk) 19:52, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: @Ferkjl I think that by pulling a vacuum in the tunnel, Swissmetro would be able to travel much faster. 120km in 12 min would be achievable with a constant acceleration/deceleration of 1 m/s^2 and a peak velocity of 943 km/h (262 s acceleration/deceleration duration) Sobservation (talk) 09:00, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speed 

message: This project is being revived under the name SwissMetro-NG (NG=New Generation, Neue Generation,etc.).
Numerous official reports, Speeches in Parliament, Decisions of the Swiss Parliament, Decisions of the Swiss Federal Council and other information are available as original documents on the website of SwissMetro-NG. (www.swissmetro-ng.org). Please update the Wikipedia article in English, German, French and Italian.
82.192.230.97 (talk) 16:20, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Requests for edits in other languages must be made in their respective versions of Wikipedia. Ferkjl (talk) 17:42, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Information, Project revival 
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/2026 FIFA World Cup

message: *Do Not DeleteThank you. It's about time somebody spoke some sense like the guy above. Not one single coherent point for deletion. Not one. Only people suggesting delete have no basis whatsoever. just the same tired old nonsense that 2026 is a long time away. Don't read it if it bothers you. please withhold stupid inputs about speculation. Leave the facts alone. This is an encyclopaedia. Palx 15:22, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Jonathan Ross (disambiguation)

message: recently changed this page from a disambiguation page to a redirect to Jonathan Ross (television presenter).  I think we should probably keep it as a disambiguation page, even though the Senator only served for a year (1899-1900).  Wikipedia's systemic bias is going to favor a contemporary celebrity over a historical figure, but that doesn't mean that a T.V. personality is automatically more significant than a Senator. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 03:33, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambig or redirect?
Talk:Richard Pigott

message: Pigott or Piggott? Bastie 16:04, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Piggott --TD 13:59, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Britannica has it as Pigott, as does the National Portrait Gallery. Bastie 10:34, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, the pig irony of it. It's been sitting there wrong for four whole years—what explains your "hesitency" to press the point?! Xanthoxyl < 01:06, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tama Toshi Monorail Line

message: Just wanted to put a note here since I think taking it out makes more sense than changing it.  I've removed the line:
"Large deficits from construction have caused the corporation to become insolvent"
from the intro since it's source is from 2006 (and now a dead link), while this report from 2015:
http://www.tama-monorail.co.jp/company/pdf/29jigyo.pdf
seems to indicate liabilities of ¥46.8 billion and assets of ¥76.6 billion (page 13).126.6.206.204 (talk) 23:37, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed insolvency section.
Talk:Tokyo Monorail

message: The companies' homepage shows a new logo, when was iut introduceed?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.7.64.54 (talk) 07:42, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

message: What is the full length of the route?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.232.64.159 (talk • contribs) 10:31, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is 17.8 km.  Thanks for noticing the omission.--MrFishGo Fish 02:34, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: In :ja:東京モノレール羽田線(Tokyo Monorail Haneda Line]], "Tokyo Monorail line" in this article is treated as one of :ja:東京モノレール(Tokyo Monorail) lines. (it's the fact). Should this article be changed to Tokyo Monorail Haneda Line?--Izumi5 02:40, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tokyo Monorail is a company, right?

message: I can't figure out how to edit the infobox template - or whether I am even allowed to - but could someone please correct the spelling of "Inaugration"?
DAJF 00:59, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. I can now see  how it works. DAJF 15:40, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox typo: "Inaugration"

message: I recently edited the page to change the ridership figure from 300,000 down to 120,692.   The 300,000 is cited on the web a lot and it appears to be the CAPACITY of the system.  If you let google translate this page (http://www.tokyo-monorail.co.jp/company/profile.html) you will see the correct figure.  I will add this as well to try to clarify the issue.   I will also adjust the main Monorail page.   It is still he busiest monorail LINE in the world; Walt Disney World Monorail is the busiest SYSTEM with ~150,000 passengers per day.
The ridership figures comes from http://www.tokyo-monorail.co.jp/company/profile.html.  On the page is a list of the 2011 "Per day by getting on and off station personnel" by station; if you sum all the figures given then divide by two (i.e. every passenger both enters and exits a station) the daily ridership for that year is 120,692.   
Tjej (talk) 14:36, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Ridership

message: https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2019/02/26/national/hanedas-international-terminal-renamed-terminal-3-amid-large-scale-renovations/#.XNhYORRKgdU --Truflip99 (talk) 17:31, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  International Terminal station rename to Terminal 3 in March 2020
Talk:Dave Dickenson

message: Is this really a stub at this point?  I reorganized the site a bit with the information at hand, and it looks pretty complete to me (especially in comparison with some "non-stub" articles like Marcus Crandell's).  I may return to flesh out some more info on Dickenson's professional career (the original editor did a great job on Dickenson's college career at Montana, IMHO). Sundevilesq 16:10, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:BeOS R5

message: What part of this article needs verification? I read over it and I believe it to be correct.
:The release date. Thats about it. --Kiand 21:46, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

message: The article claims that Haiku "includes features never implemented into BeOS, including: wifi support". BONE includes support for WiFi builtin, including the then-popular prism chipsets, and has a skeleton for support for other WiFi chipsets as well, for which drivers exist and were circulated. 75.188.220.130 (talk) 22:50, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Inaccurate statements about Haiku?
Talk:Pasadena (TV series)

message: According to the IMDb listing for this show, the last six or so episodes were not broadcast until 2005. Is this correct? 23skidoo 16:16, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK that's cool. But this should be mentioned in the infobox as that's where I got my first impression, not from reading down the artice. 23skidoo 00:55, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

text: If you check Template_talk:Infobox_Television#Usage, the number of episodes is number of episodes, not a history of which episodes showed where. That's why there's an actual article.x 15:26, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Broadcast dates

message: I think it would be better if you saved the logo of the series.  Avestaboy (talk) 17:04, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point. There doesn't seem to be a title card on Google, I'll try to grab one from the video.— TAnthonyTalk 17:10, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  — TAnthonyTalk 17:27, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo
Talk:Aziz Aslam Shaikh

message: This page could probably do with some of his more controversial stands on particular issues, or perhaps a mini-biography?  Maybe both?  I'll dig for the information when I get the chance, but I'd prefer someone closer to the Indian political scene to do some of the research into his recent political career.  Orethrius 16:20, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable Politician? 
Talk:Tappan, New York

message: The Video of the Old 76 House was not promoting or advertizing the restaurant. The person on the video was commenting on the History of the 76 House during the American Revolution and some of the other historical structures nearby....
Example the Reformed Church of Tappan, General Lafayette's house, John André's trial..... 
The video's showed pictures and items from that period. Notice that the video talked about the green door... but did not pan to promote the restaurant.  I found it interesting and thought others would also. Historically that is....
I have been editing - (adding, fixing,...) the hamlets, villages & towns of Rockland County. Thank you for monitoring these pages and removing items that are inappropriate.
192.203.40.251 (talk) 15:40, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I just added a link to a separate article on the The Old 76 House. ----DanTD (talk) 19:51, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old 76 House Video
Talk:Henry Gidney

message: Sometiomes, when I come to speedy delete, I find gems recommended for deletion. --Bhadani 16:25, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The page is moving towards copyvio. More cut & paste may invite its deletion. --Bhadani 17:19, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio
Talk:Gabby Giffords

message: Change last paragraph ...and will preside over the Rose Parade and the Rose Bowl game.[2]
to
...and presided over the Rose Parade and the Rose Bowl game.[2] 68.230.84.71 (talk) 03:02, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: The 2023 parade and game have not yet happened, so past tense not appropriate at this time RudolfRed (talk) 04:07, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The 2023 parade and game have now occurred — past tense is now appropriate. Jrfisher8 (talk) 15:56, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Updated to past tense. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:16, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 10 November 2022
Talk:Wayne Boden

message: He was rather young.  Can more detail be provided? —71.154.208.74 00:36, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: None. Based on the sources I checked there is no explicit cause of death. RashBold Talk to me 22:23, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Try the first link in the External links section. Also I do have a copy of the book mentioned in the References section.  21:49, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

text: Perhaps related to the foregoing discussion, I have placed an unreferenced tag on the article. I know that are a couple of sources at the bottom but they should really be linked in as footnotes don't you think? Some sourcing would go along way in clearing up any questions. JBEvans 17:56, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  “natural causes”
Talk:Dark green fritillary

message: My book calls it Mesoacidalia aglaia Pliny 16:32, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Latin Name
Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2006-07-17/In the news

message: Is David Letterman's reading of an entire Wikipedia article (cougar (slang)) on The Late Show the sort of thing that is appropriate for inclusion on this page? Michael Hardy 16:36, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it would be. When did it happen? We might want to include it in next week's issue. If you have things like this to pass on, they can be mentioned on the suggestions page. --Michael Snow 20:03, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thursday, July 13th, 2006.  See talk:cougar (slang). Michael Hardy 18:12, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

text: We do prefer to save new stuff for the next issue, since otherwise a lot of readers will miss the information. But thanks for pointing it out. --Michael Snow 18:40, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Lady Tremaine

message: hi i just need to point this out but lucifer may be a refrence to Lucifer or satan.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.65.20.115 (talk) 17:06, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  lucifer 

message: Found this via new page review.  A quick search in Google Scholar shows that this character is often the subject of study, indicating that it's certainly notable.  This article would benefit immensely if someone who is knowledgeable about the topic could do a quick literature review and summarize her significance in the study of English literature.  FalconK (talk) 05:55, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sourcing
File talk:David Barkley.jpg

message: This photo looks extremely doctored -- not by the uploader, but by the Army source.  Note the strange skin and eye colors, the different levels of focus, the jagged lines, the unusual lighting, etc.  Is it perhaps Army practice to use stock photos when no photo is available, or to colorize or cut and paste existing photos to match the modern format? --M@rēino 16:40, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I would guess someone in the army cut it out of a group photo, blew it up, and colored it... But that's just a guess. --Falcorian (talk) 16:52, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Yeah, I came here to check if this photo is not some prank... --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 18:40, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Hahah, I thought this was from a video game.
here is a better quality, b&w photo if anybody cares enough to do the work:
http://www.bragg.army.mil/82EO/Files/Culture%20&%20Observances/Hispanic%20American/Hisp%20MOH.pdf   -Murcielago 02:47, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Done.  (Obviously, that's the original, pre-doctored photograph.)  —David Levy 03:20, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:Professor Ratigan

message: I took the liberty of editing this page by taking out the part about that fake movie sequel and the James Earl Jones thing. I did this because I really enjoy the movie and the character Ratigan in particular. Vincent Price is just so awesome! Anyway, I hope that this edit was okay with everyone else.
HAs anyone else noticed the resemblance to Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper? 24.215.73.30 (talk) 00:28, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  ATTENTION! 

message: It's been expressed that this article be expanded, but I don't really think there's much more to say, so shouldn't this be merged into the Great Mouse Detective article, or shouldn't we create a page for characters of the film and stick this in? Just a suggestion...HadesDragon 15:38, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestion
Talk:Mendocino Brewing Company

message: I've reverted User:Beetstra's edit, because (s)he presented no evidence that a link to Beer Advocate is spam. There is no easily located blacklist, despite the edit summary; the template has not been removed or listed for deletion, and the link is not on Wikipedia's spam blacklist. Αργυριου (talk) 22:05, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  blacklisted link? 
Talk:Aphthous stomatitis

message: Personally I consider it the best treatment. For those who are not familiar with Policresulen, it is a liquid thing, when apply on the ulcer, it will cause an immense pain that makes me cry. But after that a layer of died cells is formed, and as such pain is completely eliminated. It lasted for about 24 hours. Golopotw (talk) 14:13, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Treatment should include [[Policresulen]] 

message: This image was recently added by User:SimplisticReps
A prior image was added by User:BedrockPerson who is likely a prior blocked account. 
We now have User:יבריב attempting to edit war it into place. May need to take this to SPI / ANI.
Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 00:58, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: Everyone I know calls this a cold sore. Maybe it's just the local dialect of my area (Hudson Valley, New York), but they clearly are not talking about herpes.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.206.181.191 (talk) 17:00, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other Names 

message: The information in thud article about the relation between aphthuos stomatitis and tobacco smoking is confusing and seems somewhat co tradictory, first saying that it is more common in smokers, then explaining why smokers are protected. In fact, this article and the German one both seem to cite https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4024130/ with contradictory interpretations. I think the German article is right in interoreting this as meaning smoking causes less sores. 2A02:8071:D84:A8E0:5826:D901:CBB2:8B5F (talk) 07:32, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Smoking