lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Wolfe Creek Crater

message: "The crater was featured in the 2005 horror film Wolf Creek, the plot of which included unusual electromagnetic activity in the surrounding area."
How true is this statement?... And would this statement be true for surrounding area's?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Matthew.wills (talk • contribs) 08:00, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  electromagnetic activity? 

message: For some reason, the coordinates link is spot on for Google Maps, but about 30 km off for Google Earth. I tried to correct it, but to no avail. Can anyone help? Iantnm (talk) 14:36, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinates 

message: I'm definitely not an expert for this. But the "Wolfe Creek crater from the air" photo looks very different from what the satellite modes of Google Maps or Bing Maps show (opened those via the coordinates link in the article).
E.g. on the satellite photos there is no sign of the rocky area which is being visible on the right site of the crater on the photo. And the crater on the photo looks like much bigger than 800 meters (if I had to guess, I would say the crater on the picture has about 10 KM of diameter - have a look at the rivers).
As said: I'm no expert on this. Maybe the rocks god just covered by bad weather and mudd...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Wolfe_Creek_crater_from_the_air.jpg
KolAflash (talk) 16:22, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The information with the Satellite photo states that the image is about 6.45km across and scaling from the image the crater is about 11% of the image width. This would make the diameter about 720m diameter, which is close enough, given measurement inaccuracies, from a small image. Lkingscott (talk) 14:39, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect photo!? 

message: There are two very different weights given in the article, so which one is right?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:908:C63:9680:E5FD:3F5B:183D:191C (talk) 07:33, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Updated weight according to size and Portsmouth university reference. Lkingscott (talk) 14:31, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct weight? 

message: As many other sources still show the 300,000 year old age, I expanded the age explanation, with reference to the Portsmouth University research. 
Note also that the weight according to the same research is 14,000 tonnes which better matches the diameter. I.e. a spherical iron meteorite with 7.874 tonnes/m3 density of iron would be slightly more than a 15 metres diameter sphere.Lkingscott (talk) 14:27, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Updated weight and expanded age explanation
Talk:Nage people

message: I don't know why we still get this type of condescending "anthropological" (i.e. imperialist) reference to smaller nations in the world; but it would be better if the Nage were referred-to as a people -- which they are -- and their so-called "primitiveness" instead spoken-of as pre- something-or-other. Or even stone-age. Nothing condescending about that -- if true. No reference is made here to how they actually live their lives today.
And I wouldn't doubt that this "tribe" used to have a much larger national territory at some time in the past, before the growth of empires, for that matter.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pazouzou (talk • contribs) 07:15, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Reworded "primitive tribe" -> "indigenous people". — Indon (reply) — 07:23, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  And just who's primitive here?
Talk:Murmillo

message: The murmillo armatura does not fight the secutor (in fact, the secutor _is_ a murmillo with a different helmet, specialised for fighting the retiarius). I should know: I'm the murmillo on the current reenactment photographs (July 07). ;-) Murmillones are paired with the thraex, the hoplomachus and (very rarely) the provocator.
Muddles about gladiator armaturae are admirably resolved by having recourse to the published works of Dr Junkelmann.
:No and no. Your Latin seems pretty suspect, as the proper plural of myrmillo (not murmillo in my sources either) is mymillonis (and you couldn't even be bothered pluralizing the names of the other gladiator types: thraex->thraecis, hoplomachus->hoplomachi, and provocator->provocatores). Calling the gladiatorial types armaturae, which simply means "armors", also has no attestation I can locate.
:Junkelmann, while seemingly a hero to reenactors is often wrong about Latin--mainly as he seems to want to give names to things irrespective of historicity. See the extensive discussions of this under retiarius: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Retiarius#Spongia_.3D_Shoulder_Guard.3F, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Retiarius#Balteus, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Retiarius#Manica.67.101.119.99 (talk) 22:41, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Murmillo's opponent 

message: To avoid confusion the gladiators in the reenactment photos should be labeled since only one of the gladiators is a murmillo (example: on the left is a murmillo gladiator paired with a thraex on the right side.)
The mosaic is misleading. It does not (as the caption states) depict a Murmillo. The two gladiators are clearly equites, not Murmillo.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stewydragon (talk • contribs) 21:49, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture captions 

message: "murmillo was a type of gladiator during the Roman Imperial age. The myrmillio"
Is it "murmillo" or "myrmillio", or are both correct?  Thanks.  Wanderer57 (talk) 17:37, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm seeing both in the dictionaries, but the "y" seems to be more common and therefore favored.67.101.119.99 (talk) 22:49, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Wiktionary has mirmillo as the standard English spelling, myrmillo as an alternative form and mirmillo also as the standard Latin form and murmillo and myrmillo as alternative forms. The whole article should be corrected. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/mirmillo#English217.138.41.74 (talk) 11:36, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling question 

message: 18:42, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yup. Daily Fail. -- ChrisO (talk) 18:53, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did someone use this wikipedia entry without accreditation? 

message: The 3rd century Roman mosaic would be more likely a depiction of two equites fighting on foot. 
Murmilliones rarely fought themselves and used slightly different equipment.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.113.103.164 (talk) 16:02, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  3rd century Roman mosaic
Talk:Michael Petroni

message: Please add a.season 2 it was awsome. Cast was amazing. Stories were relevant. I loved it and have been promoting it to my family and friends. 2600:6C52:4840:3294:CDB9:C862:3A1D:CEAC (talk) 18:21, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Season 2 Messiah
Talk:Antenna arrays

message: Both of these items are the same thing (phased arrays use constructive interference).  The only distinction is size and spacing of the elements.  By reciprocity, the array can be used for receiving or transmitting.  Whether the signal is astronomical or earth-bound is simply based on where the array is directed.  We should eliminate the disambiguation page, just use a redirect, and ensure that the explanation is appropriate. Nimur 11:53, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Phased vs. Interferometric
Talk:Sikh philosophy

message: this article seems to be about peoples own projections and ideas
~  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Balvinder1 (talk • contribs) 23:37, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: poor article

message: I have a problem with the following paragraph. The implication is that animals are capable of the same level of consciousness as humans. I am not aware of any such belief in Sikhism. The implication is also that Sikhs animal worship. This is not true
:#God’s spirit: All creatures have God’s spirits and must be properly respected. Show love for all living things. Mistreatment or harming of any living creature is tabooed and forbidden. Remember, your next birth may be as a different animal. 
::Sikh's acknowlege that God is within those who are capable of being a Gurmukh, i.e. those capable of higher consciousness, on our planet there is only one creature capable of this, and that is the human.
:::To the poster of this section:
I don't believe that Sikhs believe that God is only within beings with "higher consciousness." That statement, in fact, defies the foundations of Sikhism. Japji Sahib clearly says:
"hukam rajaa-ee chalnaa naanak likhi-aa naal
Says Nanak, By Abiding by the Command of God, which is written along with everyone!"
You are right in implying that Sikhism does not acknowledge that animals are of the same level of consciousness as humans. I don't think that that's what the section that you quoted implies at all, though. What it implies is simply that we must respect all living things. (71.166.8.176 (talk) 06:04, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: God's Spirit?

message: I don't recall a statement that said sikhs cannot touch Muslim women?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.48.244.45 (talk) 04:04, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It was an edict from the 10th Sikh Guru preventing Sikh men from having relations with Muslim women. This was more to do with preserving relations with Muslims, who do not allow Muslim women to marru out of thier religion. SH 07:21, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Muslim Women

message: Proposal to merge Prohibitions in Sikhism, Three pillars of Sikhism, Five Virtues and Five Thieves into this article.
* Merge - The content in the Prohibitions in Sikhism, Three pillars of Sikhism, Five Virtues and Five Thieves articles can easily be explained in the context of Sikh philosophy Tindy1986 (talk) 22:50, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger Discussion
Talk:High Bridge (Appomattox River)

message: The Columbia-Wrightsville Bridge across the Susquehanna River in Pennsylvania was over a mile and a quarter in length, making it the longest railroad bridge and the longest covered bridge in the world at the time of its construction in the early 1800s. It was burned by the Union army during the Gettysburg Campaign to prevent Gordon's usage. The High Bridge was the longest railroad only bridge, I believe.
regards! 
Scott Mingus 12:13, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The High Bridge is less than half the length of the Walkway Over The Hudson, formerly the Poughkeepsie-Highland railroad bridge. The Pennsylvania Railroad Bridge is 1400' shorter than the Poughkeepsie bridge. RussNelson (talk) 12:28, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Longest bridge?

message: There stood two different bridges east of Farmville, Virginia. The second was built in  1914 while the original bridge supported by bricks carried rail traffic. When the new bridge was completed it was opened to traffic on 22 June, 1914 and the old bridge described in this article was taken out of service and dismantled shortly thereafter. 
This is detailed on the National Railroad Historical Society Blue Ridge chapter web page
http://www.blueridgenrhs.org/articles/High_Bridge.htm
They were fortunate enough to snag on eBay about 70 glass negatives of the construction of the replacement bridge taken by its engineer.
Boteman (talk) 05:59, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Two Bridges
Talk:Jeu des petits chevaux

message: Is the interwiki link to the French version an acceptable reference?--Niels Ø (noe) 12:20, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I don't believe so as WP cannot cite itself. See WP:Cite Gillyweed 21:24, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References tag?
Category talk:Beauty pageant winners

message: The new article titled, "Beauty Pageant Winners" should NOT be deleted. Every effort should be made to maintain it. The category functions wholly as an extended article that widens the scope of the pageant industry due to the prerequisite of which entrants must qualify: it represents a canon of individuls who have actually won noteworthy titles. In comparison, the category titled "Beauty pageant contestants" differs widely: being a pageant contestant allows for any entrant who has ever walked on a pageant stage to qualify, whereas the former lends itslf as a comprehensive list of people who have actually won notable titles. In addition, although wonderfully written, articles such as "Miss America Winners" sharply limit the list to a specific organization. Without the existence of the "Beauty Pageant Winners" category, noteworthy pageant WINNERS would not have a combined category to serve as the canon of noteworthy individuals. I implore you to please make every effort to block its deletion.
Open24hrs 12:21, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Yongsan Electronics Market

message: I added a link to IPark Mall within this marketplace area. It is not a commercial endorsement, so please don't take it as such. It is only intended for the reference content. I will try to add more links to other buildings and shopping malls in the area as I find them them. --220.76.15.39 (talk) 15:36, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: links to shopping malls
Talk:Philippine Merchant Marine Academy

message: re Naval and Coast Guard Commissions are these active or reserve commissions, i.e do graduates have to serve an active term in the Navy or Coast Guard before being released to civilian service or are they immediately free to pursue a civilian career but can be called up for active service only if needed. (I'm sorting out image files in Commons and in two minds as to how appropriate it would be to place PMMA in the Military of the Philippines cat).KTo288 (talk) 03:33, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Naval and Coast Guard Commissions

message: I wonder what happened to the site.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.104.84.25 (talk) 05:54, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  PMMAYER.NET 

message: I am a Pakistani and I want to get admission in Marine Academy what is basic qualification? can I get Admission and what about fee? can any body send me details, i just passed my secondary school certificate examination. Danish Qamar
thank you
 qamarkasmiri@yahoo.com  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.82.194.239 (talk) 10:28, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Admission 

message: Good day Sir/Mam , 
I would like to inquire about my son do you have a Senior Highschool course ?if you have  how can i apply in yourschool ? what are the requirements ? Hope you will reply .
Regards , 
Marilou Marilou Capulla Segovia (talk) 00:50, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inquire
Talk:Philippine Normal University

message: What does 'normal' refer to in this context - basic all-around education? Secular education as opposed to a religious school? Thank you, Feather Jonah II (talk) 07:35, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: See Normal School.Naraht (talk) 11:17, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Normal' 
Talk:Philippine Women's University

message: The ff. parts of the article sound like adverts/buzzwords and peacock terms:  "The Philippine Women's University... promotes Christian education and inter-faith ecumenism in the character formation of our learners...", "...with emphasis on the PWU Core Values of spirituality and ethical professionalism, cultural heritage and leadership in women's education, and professional competencies for global citizenship toward sustainable development", "PWU has proven itself to be an enduring institution", etc. I'm not familiar with the policy regarding these. Anyone more experienced care to comment on this, or direct me to what I can do to correct this?
Galacticninja (talk) 06:57, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parts of the article sound like adverts/buzzwords and peacock terms
Talk:GE Money

message: Reading over this article, it reads like an advertisement/promo piece, almost like it was copied from a GE website or something. Anyone else think it is a bit less than neutral? The entire article is basically a list of where the company operates, without any real information, nor reception/criticism (despite it being under some like most credit companies), etc. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 20:19, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality
Talk:NextCard

message: * OPENERS: SUITS; CASH ONLY, PLEASE
* U.S. Seizes Bank Business Of Web Credit Card Issuer
* Luxury Sites Revamp Credit Plans
* Luxury goods e-tailers hope new credit plans will move pricey merchandise
Jlevi (talk) 22:15, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible sources
Talk:Butter pie

message: This article should reference "UK" or "Britain" somewhere in the first paragraph.  I read most of the article before I realized where butter pie originated (the info box on the side does have the country reference, but I usually don't start reading an article by reading that box).  Anyway, I'm sure the cities referred to in the article are well known to the locals but the rest of us could use some help.  Thanks.  
By the way, it is a good article, containing all of the info I was looking for.
N0w8st8s (talk) 14:54, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: As the original author I am delighted to read comments of people who are pleased with the article. So many Wikipedia articles are controversial. AIUI the pies do contain butter although it is not the main ingredient. Also the statement that the pie doesn't exist outside of Preston and South Ribble is not entirely correct - last October I was on a course in Manchester where "butter pie" was served. I will make a slight change to the article. Rugxulo 23:46, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 
Talk:Summer (Subtle EP)

message: jesus, give us a chance... W guice 18:11, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: infobox
Talk:Life (Andy Hunter album)

message: Is this album really considered to be a studio full length album?  I was just about to change the infobox so that the type was EP but I wasn't sure what the rest of the editors thought. jesusfreak210 (talk) 01:16, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Album Type 
Talk:Paletten

message: In  I wrote "calculation" in place of "cancellation". One could only refer to the penultimate issue of a cancelled magazine. Removed reference to an issue being "current". You should assume that what you write may be read today, tomorrow or in 100 years. Notinasnaid 13:24, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This change was repeated by anonymous editor 69.84.124.173 on 4 Match 2007. In the absence of discussion, I have reverted it. I have left the rest of the changes (except an unnecessary link to Swedish Wikipedia which was already there as an Interwiki link) intact. Notinasnaid 21:10, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note on a change to remove "penultimate" 

message: This seems to be a bit of an advertisement. It is not very encyclopedic. Nice there is lots of material though. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.181.201.147 (talk) 21:36, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not NPOV
Talk:Graham King

message: Part of this article was lifted from  so I removed the copywritten portions. The article now needs to be expanded and properly cited, so I welcome editors to do that. Regards, Daysleeper47 (talk) 14:11, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagerism 

message: Is there a reliable source for his birth date that is not indirectly copied from Wikipedia or IMDB? On Dutch Wikipedia we were unable to find one, and an anonymous contributor insists that the correct date is actually 19 September 1961. I'd suggest removing the birthdate if there is no reliable source for it. effeietsanders 05:27, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I see that you added the date in a longago era. Do you happen to recall the source you used for this? It has propagated over the internet since... effeietsanders 18:12, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Considering Kaveh hasn't contributed since 2009, you may not get a response... BOVINEBOY2008 17:23, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  I realize that, which is why I posted it here rather than their talkpage. But if you know someone else who may know? I see LoC mentions December, but not sure how reliable that is (i.e. if they independently verify or may have based on imdb etc -- this historical version suggests they took it from imdb themselves.). effeietsanders 17:28, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source birthdate
Talk:Barnum's American Museum

message: There's actually a ridiculous amount of information available on this museum considering its age. I added some but there's more if someone wants to tackle it. TRAVELLINGCARIMy storyTell me yours 19:43, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: Whilst researching pages of the New York Daily Tribune, January 2nd., 1860 I took note of the fourth block, fith column advertisement for Barnum's American Museum. The admittance fees were (quote) '25 cents; Children under 10, 13 cents; Parquet, 13 cents extra'. The link to the page :  http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030213/1860-01-02/ed-1/seq-1/  . If anyone can explain the 'Parquet' admission fee I'd be most interested to hear from you! MZionC (talk) 19:42, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Daily Tribune Advertisement, 1860. 
Talk:Boston Consulting Group's Advantage Matrix

message: Hi, I think this link should be added as a reference to the article. I'll leave it to a more experienced editor to add. I need to play in the sandpit before I try edit any article pages myself :) Anyhow here's the link http://www.bcg.com/publications/files/Experience_Curve_IV_Growth_Share_Matrix_1973.pdf 123.208.35.102 (talk) 15:02, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

message: It seems to me that this reads like an advert for BCG. I find sentences like "Apart from the fact that it has not suffered as badly at the hands of later popularizers, the particular advantage of this matrix" particularly alarming. I don't really know anything about what constitutes improper behaviour on wikipedia, but it seems like some of this language extends to other BCG articles.
Quevenski (talk) 11:10, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questionable neutrality
Talk:Christian Cook

message: Why isn't there an image in the infobox given that one appears in the article? Don't see why cropping Cook from the photo would be a problem if there are no other free pics available. Cavie78 (talk) 20:52, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Image
Talk:Éleuthère Irénée du Pont

message: This page has been the subject of massive, consecutive vandalism. I rv to last non-vandalized edit.
Consider protecting the page!Veronica Mars fanatic 14:01, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like it has calmed down. Everything related to the French Revolution seems to get at least occasional vandals. When this is ongoing, semi-protection is probably the best choice. In the future, if this comes up, see Wikipedia:Requests for page protection: that will get a rapid response, which a comment on the talk page typically will not. - Jmabel | Talk 17:09, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Under Children from "Sophie" there is a link to "Samuel Francis Du Pont" which is not one of Éleuthère Irénée children but a nephew.
I am not sure how to fix that. I don't know if Sophie was a daughter (with the same name as his wife) or not. Also, I am not sure if "Samuel Francis Du Pont" should be erased from the page or somehow referred to differently.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rehud (talk • contribs) 06:34, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Samuel Francis Du Pont
Talk:Clifton Cathedral

message: The Info box dwarfs the article. Is there not a degree of duplication with a map (not very useful) plus repeated references to coordinates (which give links to much better maps)? Occuli 18:54, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info box 

message: This article is well-written, well-illustrated and well-referenced. It's certainly not Start Class. I've given it a B. I think it would easily make GA, and possibly more. KJP1 (talk) 12:23, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  B class