Talk:Washington College/Archive 1

message: what criteria makes some alumni more important than others? either put none or all on the front page. WillC 21:34, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Important Alumni

message: Is it possible, now that most of the discussion is over and terms are reached for further editing are clarified, that we can delete some of this mess? D-Hell-pers 05:10, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleaning Up

message: So I got my hands on Issue 18 of 2005 (the issue of 'non-existence' and the one that probably will solve of all these citation problems of the fraternal hazing).
Quick citations from the article:
"The ELM received a story stating that the fraternity had already admitted to previous hazing practices in an amnesty program developed by the National Headquarters and have been given a "clean slate for being for being honest."
"[Province Representatives] had the current job of discuss[ing] the issues with hazing, and to help develop a new program for New Members."
"[Brothers of the Chapter] admit that [they] made a mistake..."
"[the current Brothers] were honest about the hazing, and were working on preventing it from happening again."
The article clearly states they were busted for a specific campus policy violation ... HAZING!  The article is (2) pages long describing that the brothers were honest in fessing up to their hazing activities (although we will never know how much they truly admitted) - were punished - had help from 'district' leaders to make things better - were at the time developing new Pledging Programs - and believed they could be trusted because they were truthful in owning up to their hazing rituals.
For all editors who appose reverting the revision back to the TRUTH, please state your business here.  After several days, the revision WILL be made unless discrepancies can be made & cited.WaC05 20:49, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Several days have passed, no objections stated.  Revision has been made. D-Hell-pers 23:06, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Yo I Got It

message: I have contacted Kuru to once again mediate this matter. There are still no reliable sources or citations to warrant a reversion of this article.
Additionally, after repeated vandalism of my discussion page, I took the effort to trace IPs, and run a thorough WHOIS of all parties involved not only with vandalizing my talk page, but pushing to edit this page. Ironically, they all come from the same Baltimore MD Comcast address.
Guesstimating that this could be (and probably is) the work of a single individual posting under multiple wiki accounts to try and give the illusion of consensus, I contacted Comcast to discuss their policy on online harassment from one of their customers. Not only can it result in loss of internet service, but they will additionally help the plaintiff file charges with the FBI's Cyber Crimes Task Force. 
While something this insignificant probably would only result in loss of internet service, let it be known, that if I am harassed anymore over this, I can and will provide Comcast with your information. I have saved all of this information, and you've left a horribly long trail here on wiki, that leads all the way back to your posts on Kappa Alpha Order's discussion page.
With that said, keep it clean here. Play by the rules, and I will not pursue action with your Internet Service Provider, Mr. Baltimore Comcast user.
Natural22 06:21, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Intervention

message: With the addition of some more references, now totalling (4), the fraternity issue can now be placed to rest. The proper, and final, revision has been made. D-Hell-pers 06:18, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What's amusing about this IP address bringing this "thought" up is the only edits it has made before this talkpage addition/article material deletion, were vandalistic attempts to delete the addition of a 4th fraternity, failure to acknowledge that the fraternity hazed by deleting the material, etc ... and now this.  How shocking this is to me, and probably all who look at this, that you would again attempt to delete the material.  Ironically, someone else at the school re-added the information, so I guess the WaC community does consider it to be an issue still.  I believe 24.whatever was correct in wanting to remove your non-sense again, but because s/he is not allowed to delete material I'll go ahead and put it into words that your opinion is what people don't care about, but this issue still stands. D-Hell-pers 04:27, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

text: You are more than welcome to try, as it was attempted in the past and turned down for being "bloggish."  Admins have asked for what is currently written on the article, not more or less (as long as the four citations were present).  But again, anyone can try again. D-Hell-pers 13:05, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know enough about the situation to do so (i.e. I don't go to WC), but anyone who attends WC should try to do so. Samwisep86 18:40, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fraternity Issue

message: Great American Wiknic - Chestertown, MD                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             	
	You are invited to the third Great American Wiknic taking place in Chestertown, MD, on Saturday, June 22, 2013 starting at noon! This is a chance for all of the wikipedians in the Eastern Shore to meet for an afternoon of fun and fellowship. This is a bring your own lunch event, if you have special treats you would like to share feel free to bring them. We would love to have you there!	
	                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    	
Message delivered by  Guerillero | My Talk at 20:02, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meetup 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Washington College. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120519054204/http://revcollege.washcoll.edu/firstcollege/index.html to http://revcollege.washcoll.edu/firstcollege/index.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:11, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Washington College presently has an employment advertisement for a "Digital Content Specialist" whose responsibilities include "monitor Washington College’s presence on the Web at other sites such as Wikipedia to ensure content is accurate and positive" (emphasis added).  When this individual comes on board they may need some guidance as to best practices for COI editors. Shock Brigade Harvester Boris (talk) 03:56, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Watch for COI

message: corrected spelling SliceLife (talk) 18:27, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: SliceLife