lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Royal Spanish Football Federation

message: Why has this article been reverted to English title. Body is not known by this name. Next somebody will be changing Real Madrid to Royal Madrid or Atletico Madrid to Athletic Madrid. When will this stupid discrimation against Spanish language stop.--86.135.160.97 20:22, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This isn't a discrimination, don't forget this is the English Wikipedia. As the Wikipedia:Manual of Style states, the article title should be in English (see Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English)). But I don't like "Royal Snpanish Football Federation" neither. The most common term to refer to the RFEF in the English language press is "Spanish Football Federation"), (but I've also found "Spanish Football Association"). Therefore, from my POV this article should be renamed to Spanish Football Federation, like the Italian Football Federation. Best regards --surueña 10:41, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done: moved from  to Spanish Football Federation. --surueña 07:50, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article title

message: The correct date when RFEF was founded is 1913, not 1909. The president of RFEF (Villar) distorts the date, because in 1909 has founded the first Footbal Federation in Spain (Federación Española de Clubs de Foot-Ball, Spanish Federation of Foot-Ball Clubs). Because many problems, FECF broke up and founded the RFEF. In the Spanish version of this article is more explained. --Hectordonis (talk) 16:04, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect date
Talk:Yorktown High School Theatre

message: I'm concerned that this article is unencyclopedic.  It goes into depth about the course structure of a specific department within a local public high school.  The curriculum itself is not particularly notable for its unorthodox teaching style or capable results.  Wikipedia should be kept a place to present notable or socially important topics and issues.  After seeing some comments on the discussion page of YHS proper, I am more confident in believing that this may not be appropriate wiki information.  This isn't an online course catalog, but a repository for notable human knowledge and culture.  Thoughts/input?  Sdej 20:23, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: Note that this page was nominated for deletion and it was decided to Merge/Redirect the article. The content was not deleted and the material can be found in the article history:  --Jh12 (talk) 14:32, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge/Redirect to Yorktown High School Theatre
Talk:Nándor Wagner

message: Most of the article meets WP:NPOV but there are some exceptions such as "His figures of the Silk Road are the best example how to connect the styles of East and West." and "This road of the “Garden of Philosophy” shows development of human kind and time gives us the question for necessity of new common law of the world and opens the door to think for future." -- Antaeus Feldspar 20:44, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Wagner's composition of Silk Road has been introduced more in detail adding a photo and explanation of the thema and sculpting styles he used. His words about the Garden of Philosopy were told in Hungarian so the sentence was retranslated in the hope to meet WP:NPOV. 
Nethexe
:That's a good change, thank you. -- Antaeus Feldspar 16:40, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  to meet WP:NPOV
Talk:Ernst Fetterlein

message: One source was the following: — Matt Crypto 20:45, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Extract from Madeira 2004

message: My understanding is that Fetterlein held both the rank of "admiral" and "general."  I can't think of the source anymore, but I believe that under the "Tsarist Table of Ranks," the rank of "General-Admiral" was an honorary rank the equivalent of a "Field Marshal" rank and that is what I believe Fetterlein's "honorary rank" was in the Tsarist civil service, i.e. "higher than a general or admiral."
You might want to further research this point. Thomas R. Hammant 21:04, 28 August 2006
: Thanks for the correction; do you know of any publication which mentions that he was "general"/"admiral"? — Matt Crypto 14:40, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In this article it is mentioned that Fetterlein hold civil service rank of "Статский советник" (Civil Counsellor / State Counsellor). It is one grade lower then Rear Admiral or Major General. During the first world war Fetterlein was briefly employed by Russian Navy, but his Navy rank is not clear.DonaldDuck 09:38, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ernst Fetterlein
Talk:David Dingwall

message: Just a note that I removed the concluding sentence from the article that accused Dingwall of lying during his testimony as I feel it's NPOV.  He says he quit, as do several others, and a judge concluded he was forced out.  Leaving aside whether both might be true, I don't believe it's for this article to conclude whether one person or another lied.  --Otter Escaping North 12:59, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, definatly...this article was for some time the target of partisan trolls...I tried to clean it up, but wouldn't be surprised if some were left in.  Good work.Habsfan|t 14:29, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:United States congressional delegations from Louisiana

message: We have to put in party designations.  Color-blind readers can't necessarily see them.  See Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Formatting issues.  Color can be left in, but we need to have also the (D) and (R) for the parties.—Mark Adler (markles) 20:56, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Colors

message: The 2008 race for the 4th district has not been called yet.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.155.191.53 (talk) 05:48, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 4th House District

message: What's the basis for designating Michael Hahn a "Unionist"?  He identified with the radical Republicans, but there may be something I don't know.  Rammer (talk) 03:02, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unionist? 
Talk:United States congressional delegations from Kentucky

message: We have to put in party designations.  Color-blind readers can't necessarily see them.  See Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Formatting issues.  Color can be left in, but we need to have also the (D) and (R) for the parties.—Mark Adler (markles) 20:57, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Colors

message: The 4th and 5th districts are reversed for the past several decades.  This should be fixed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by LanternLight (talk • contribs) 16:43, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Errors
Talk:United States congressional delegations from Alabama

message: We have to put in party designations.  Color-blind readers can't necessarily see them.  See Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Formatting issues.  Color can be left in, but we need to have also the (D) and (R) for the parties.—Mark Adler (markles) 20:57, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Colors

message: Does anyone know who Franklin P. Glass is?  Bioguide and political graveyard don't have him.--Rayc 14:15, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Franklin P. Glass 
Talk:Advertising network

message: I propose merging Ad serving into Advertising network. I think the topic of Ad serving largely overlaps with this article and details on ad networks' history, functionality and optimisation can be included to this article. PaulT2022 (talk) 13:51, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 20:06, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:United States congressional delegations from Mississippi

message: We have to put in party designations.  Color-blind readers can't necessarily see them.  See Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Formatting issues.  Color can be left in, but we need to have also the (D) and (R) for the parties.—Mark Adler (markles) 20:58, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Colors

message: It is not clear what are the differences between Class 1 Senators and Class 2 Senators. Would someone place a definition. I would if I knew. I suspect it refers to junior and senior senators, but am not certain. Thanks.Skywriter 17:20, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Simply put, senators are elected every 6 years; since we have elections every two years in the US, these are staggered. Every two years, 1/3 of all senators are up for re-election. So there are three classes; Class 1 was the group whose first term ended 1791, Class 2's first term ended 1793, and Class 3's first term ended 1795. This means that all of the first class 1 senators only had a term of two years. And this continued, just add 6 years to each of the above years to find out when each class is up for re-election. (Class 1's term is up in 2007) This should be added somewhere. --Golbez 18:19, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Class 1, Class 2 differences

message: Sorry, but I can't quite figure out how to get the table formatting correct so that it shows both Senator Lott and Senator Wicker serving during the 110th Congress. Any help? I appreciate it.
Oregon Bear (talk) 23:55, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Adding Senator Wicker
Talk:1997 NASCAR Winston Cup Series

message: I remember hearing Mike Joy say during the 1998 Daytona 500 that the roofcams had been banned in 1997 before being brought back with approval for 1998. What prompted the ban? Was there an accident that broke a camera off a car and sent it into the grandstands? Maybe some concern from the teams about too much drag? I know they used to be quite noticeable in size before they figured out how to reduce them to the size of a Tic-Tac. 184.100.22.102 (talk) 07:25, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This was due to aerodynamics, and NASCAR wanting them all to be equal.  Eventually they ran with the roof camera pods on all the cars, whether they were carrying a camera or not. --Bluorangefyre (talk) 08:30, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roof Cameras
Talk:United States congressional delegations from Arkansas

message: We have to put in party designations.  Color-blind readers can't necessarily see them.  See Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Formatting issues.  Color can be left in, but we need to have also the (D) and (R) for the parties.—Mark Adler (markles) 20:56, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Colors
Talk:No Fences

message: I've removed the "Background" section. The entire content of the section was an unsourced quote from a now-defunct Angelfire page (wayback machine copy can be found here), and the only hits on Google for the quote are from copies of this entry. If someone can find a source, feel free to re-add. --KnucklesKnave (talk) 04:57, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed "Background" section
Talk:Johnston diagram

message: Who were Johnston diagrams named after?  Was it the British logician William Ernest Johnson?  Note the different spelling.  See Scientific phenomena named after people.  DFH 12:36, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Which logic tutorial link?  --Lambiam 20:07, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who were they named after? 

message: Is the only difference with Venn diagrams that the overlap of the circles represents A∧B instead of A∩B?  --Lambiam 21:37, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Difference with Venn diagrams 

message: * This is how the article was started in 2002, by an IP (207.6.192.108) which now resolves to British Columbia.
* The original stub basically explains that Johnston diagrams are exactly the same thing as Venn diagram, only for propositional logic instead of set theory.
* The original stub links to [logictutorial.com], a site registered by Russell Johnston in British Columbia. 
* Regardless of whether the idea of renaming Venn diagrams when using them for propositional logic has any merit (I don't think so), it certainly makes no sense to name them after the author of this dubious site.
* The article has been tagged as completely unreferenced for 2 1/2 years, since November 2006. 
* The article has been tagged as orginal research for 1 1/2 years, since January 2008. 
Consequently, I am prodding this article. --Hans Adler (talk) 23:25, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion rationale
Talk:Church of Anthrax

message: I'm curious as to why the album is categorized as free jazz.  While there may be some improvisation here I'm not sure any of it (much less the entire album) qualifies as "free" . -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 05:28, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd forgotten that I had brought this up, but it was almost 6 years ago.  I have gone ahead and removed "free jazz" from the infobox. In any case it wasn't otherwise mentioned (nor sourced) in the article's text. -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 20:59, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Free jazz?
Talk:Coritiba Foot Ball Club

message: <BR>
Help to improve articles related to Brazil in Simple English Wikipedia. If you are not fluent in English, that is the right place.
<BR>
----
Can't agree on every aspect of the 'AtleTiba'.. and it has an awful lot of Atlético creation history, and not that much about the Atletiba.. Kevinklop 21:18, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

message: Shirt --> somehow the shirt stripes became grey too.. what happened??Kevinklop 11:16, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In my computer, using Mozilla Firefox, the shirt stripes are okay. Possible it is an Internet Explorer bug. See this Firefox screenshot. Regards, Carioca 19:49, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Shirt
Talk:United States congressional delegations from Georgia

message: We have to put in party designations.  Color-blind readers can't necessarily see them.  See Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Formatting issues.  Color can be left in, but we need to have also the (D) and (R) for the parties.—Mark Adler (markles) 21:19, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Colors

message: In updating entries for Georgia's Senators, I think that John Macpherson Berrien (D-R) is incorrectly listed as a class 2 senator from 1829-1831.  Those were the years that he was the US Attorney General. Surely, he didn't do both.  Looks like the cong. bio site incorrectly states that in search, but Berrien's actual bio contradicts that. Any good sources to check this out? I'd also like to see if there were any interim Senators between Berrien's later resignation in May 1845 and subsequent reelection on November 13, 1845.  Would someone mind confirming/disproving my oberservation before I edit? --Roswell native 04:50, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is an old request. I've corrected the listing. He was a Class 3 senator during this time according to Congressional Quarterly's Guide to Elections. However, I can't seem to figure out the rows and columns in the table to make it display properly, so George M. Troup is listed twice in a row. Anyone care to take a stab at fixing the table?Dcmacnut 04:37, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: John Macpherson Berrien (D-R) incorrectly listed for term as Class (2) senator?=

message: Some of the 114th Congress reps. are listed incorrectly and the table is formatted wrong. Could someone fix this error? MB298 (talk) 04:37, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Table errors 
Talk:Desertshore

message: ... so, who did play trumpet? BridesheadRecarpeted (talk) 10:49, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  all other instruments except ...
Talk:Stanford Shopping Center

message: Current version reads........
Since the land is owned by the University, the Center is often criticized for failing to appeal to students. The management of the Center does not deny the mall's elitist focus with its predominantly upscale retail offering.
The "often criticized" aspect appears to be unsubstantiated.  If there are no objections, I'll remove it.  JXM 21:22, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If there's a university somewhere in the world whose students can find nothing to complain about, Wikipedia should have an article about it.  --Vaughan Pratt (talk) 11:25, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Appeal to Students

message: The distances from San Francisco and San Jose are given as:
:The Center is approximately 45 minutes from San Francisco and 30 minutes from San Jose.
I suggest replacing this with distance in miles, as distance expressed in terms of drive times are ambiguous, and are not deterministic. --Ragib 01:40, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur.  The shopping center can be as long as 1 hour from San Francisco and 45 minutes from San Jose depending upon the traffic and where exactly one's trip originates in those cities. --Coolcaesar 06:30, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distance
Talk:Mistaken Identity (Kim Carnes album)

message: This is the UK sleeve of the album. Anyone got a decent high-res pic of the US album cover? InternationalHit2 23:28, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Great Way Government

message: I disagree because the regime(s) are most commonly known as the Wang Jingwei Regime or the Nnanking National(ist) Government, not the "Dadao government".
Furthermore, there are conceptual differences between the Dadao government (1937-1940) and the Wang Jinwei Regime. If any mergers were to occur at all, then these articles are best united under a title like "puppet governments under Japanese occupation" or something like that.
Finally, this article (Dadao government) is poorly written and seems to be talking about governments half the time and flgas the other half. It does not source Chinese language versions of proper nouns, and many transliterations do not appear to conform to any standard system (Pinyin or WG). The title does not fully reflect the contents. For some reason, the original author appeared to think that describing a flag is sufficient to describe a regime. However, he or she appeared to have neglected to put up pictures of these flags which are so central to the article as it stands.
In conclusion, the Wang Jingwei Regime and the Chinese Reformed State are different to the Dadao government. They are better known than the "Dadao government". Those articles are also much better written than the "Dadao government". Therefore the proposed merger is not appropriate.--Sumple (Talk) 21:26, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Article was a complete mess. Hopefully it is now better. --MChew (talk) 15:44, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Re: Merger proposals

message: How is the dadao govt possibly a republic? A republic has to have its head elected... and the Japanese appointed people right? I dont know, but I'm betting it was not a free and fair election. Maybe puppet govt is more appropriate Ottawakismet (talk) 19:56, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Republic
Talk:Script for a Jester's Tear

message: I feel that there is not enough content in the individual song articles to justify separate article pages.  Any special info about individual songs should be kept on the main page until the main page gets too long or complicated.  I don't feel strongly enough to nominate them for deletion myself, though. Also, the links to The Web and Grendel go to inappropriate Wiki pages instead of to song pages, so I de-Wikied them for now.  Thatcher131 04:34, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's reasonable. Song articles should only be created if the songs were notable in some way. Danceswithzerglings (talk) 16:22, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Song articles
Talk:Fugazi (album)

message: From the article: "According to Fish, the band's vocalist at the time, the title refers to a slang term from the Vietnam War; see the main Fugazi page."
What do we see on the main page? Nothing related to Vietnam - should we remove this link?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.32.130.211 (talk) 20:13, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Main Fugazi page 
Talk:The Dream of the Blue Turtles

message: The bit about Children's Crusade comparing World War I with heroin addiction seems to be based on a single mention of poppies in the song lyrics. This has nothing to do with heroin, but the bygone practice of selling poppies to support World War I veterans (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moina_Michael). A similar reference occurs in The Beatles' Penny Lane, in which a pretty nurse is selling poppies from a tray.
Kids today.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.213.238.209 (talk) 15:54, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Children's Crusade and Heroin Addiction 

message: Moon over Bourbon Street is based on Interview w/ the Vampire and there was a lot of talk about Sting playing Lestat.  Just wondering if any of that should be worked in there anywhere?
:Consider it done! --Aguerriero (talk) 02:48, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  anne rice 
Talk:Clutching at Straws

message: The "concept" section quotes no sources, but seems fairly accurate. However, this bit stands out: "lack of commercial success as a singer in a band". I'm pretty sure I've read Fish saying - and it's also supported by the lyrics - that Torch is a writer. Hence the references to the pen ticking away, and to Jack Kerouac. Jules TH 16 (talk) 08:57, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The character Torch
Talk:Seasons End

message: I removed the following line from the second paragraph:
: "At this point in Marillion's career, the band was still huge and had a much larger worldwide following than it has today."
Maybe if someone finds a proper source for that claim we can put it back. 87.206.116.54 (talk) 18:34, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry but that's nonsense. "Huge" is not a well-defined word, and they were never "huge" on the same scale as U2 or Oasis. Still, their previous albums had reached no. 1 and no. 2 and had spawned top ten hit singles, they outsold arena dates across Europe, etc. All of this is easily verifiable. That said, the article is in bad need of attention. Instead of telling us about the actual album, it's waxing lyrical about Steve H's childhood, previous bands etc. That belongs in Steve Hogarth or Marillion, not here. Jimmy Fleischer (talk) 14:42, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

message: I wrote the comment above three quarters of a year ago, and nobody replied or did anything about it. I've therefore taken care of this myself. Just in case someone still wants it, here is the text I removed: 
------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
Jimmy Fleischer (talk) 10:59, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed material 
Talk:This Strange Engine

message: This article mention "one of Germany's largest hitlists" ... can we have a name for it? Which hit list ? - Pernambuco 22:41, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed this now. There's just one official chart in Germany, no smaller or larger "hitlists". I don't remember hearing the song on the radio ever so the statement appears unfounded. BTW, the person who wrote this also reported that "Memory of Water" was a single, which is obviously untrue and further undermines their credibility. It's hard to believe that this went unnoticed for so long. kate theobaldy 11:21, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Radiation (album)

message: "the band set out to make a quick album due to money and time limits and this somewhat shows on the album." Sounds quite plausible, but is there any evidence to support this? If not, it should be worded in a more neutral way. Jimmy Fleischer (talk) 20:30, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: POV?
Talk:With a Little Help from My Friends (Joe Cocker album)

message: Happy is not listed in Cocker's discography. A big mistake in Wikipedia.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.54.224.126 (talk) 20:01, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  It’s called Cocker Happy, not Happy, was released in 1972, not '72 or '73, and is listed under that name on Wikipedia here. Also, finding that something isn’t on Wikipedia isn’t a mistake, so much as that nobody has got around to writing it yet - and you are perfectly free to add an entry if you want to… Jock123 (talk) 15:01, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where the heck is the Album "Happy" . In 1972 (or 1973) Joe Cocker released an album called Happy !
Talk:Lasse Kukkonen

message: Since this got picked up by James Mirtle, I'll remove the Tourette's reference until there's some hard evidence about it. Google didn't show up anything that would substantiate this. Ruo-kone 22:34, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tourette's syndrome / Living person bio policy 