Talk:Rashid Rida

message: The link to islamic modernist is empty. Are there no islamic modernists? Make a stub for that please. - Pernambuco 06:12, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article quotes an assertion that Rida was a freemason.  A citation is needed for this; specifically, of which lodge was he a member?
The same problem and question applies to articles on Jamal-al-Din Afghani and Muhammad `Abduh.
yoyo (talk) 16:18, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Claim of freemasonry 

message: These two movements seem to contrast, the one oriented toward the founders of Islam, the other to modernizing Islam, yet Rashid Rida is cited as following both. Can this be clarified? HGilbert (talk) 16:46, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: According to his views, he definitely wasn't a Salafi. The only reason why he is probably described as a Salafi in this Wikipedia article is people citing western writers who seem to not understand the difference.--Crazyketchupguy (talk) 14:20, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Salafi and Islamic modernism 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Rashid Rida. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071019095103/http://www.quranicstudies.com/article84.html to http://www.quranicstudies.com/article84.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:39, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20210220014044/https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229771951_Rashid_Rida%27s_Legacy. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  ƒirefly ( t · c ) 10:37, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: This page has one of the worst formatting I've seen on this website Hellbat31 (talk) 22:12, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, it's pretty grim - so much so that it's hard to know where to even begin in improving it. Iskandar323 (talk) 22:23, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formatting