lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Sex tourism in the Caribbean

message: Hi: 
I have created this page as part of a course project.  I look forward to hearing comments and suggestions as this is my first Wikipedia posting.  Also, I will be adding additional information within the week. 
Thanks
--Lex72 (talk) 01:48, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The problem here is that Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought. There may be room for an article on this subject but it will need to have a completely different form. I'm not sure where to refer you for help but perhaps you can leave a note at Talk:Sex tourism. As it stands, the article should probably be deleted. Pascal.Tesson (talk) 19:14, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

text: I agree Pascal. Nobody has touched it since you and I have now redirected the page to sex tourism. Thanks, SqueakBox 21:52, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Bliss-stick

message: Obviously I've placed the hangon tag, seriously - do a google search before tagging articles such as these, very notable company in kayak world. I will continue to expand, though it's hard to reference with us kayakers prefering to get out there and do it rather than write about it :-) -Pumpmeup 02:06, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Tag was removed by me - I know how naughty I ar, but hey it was gonna be removed by someone else in the end, right? -Pumpmeup 02:40, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: RE: csd
Talk:Barrineau Park, Florida

message: Hey all, I'm the WikiProject Cities assessor of this article. If feedback is what you want and need, come to my talk page and give me a holler! --Starstriker7(Say hior see my works) 22:10, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Myth of Prometheus (Piero di Cosimo)

message: I tagged the last part of the article; my only beef is that it belongs elsewhere than in an article about a 16c painting. Sparafucil (talk) 02:15, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  VernoWhitney (talk) 14:25, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:UEFA Euro 2008 broadcasting rights

message: How much has the BBC paid for the rights? Will it become cheaper after the disqualification of all British teams? 83.135.36.156 (talk) 02:46, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Section header inserted here

message: Those deals need revising. For example, I couldn't find any information about broadcasting contract with Afghanistan's Sports' channel on UEFA.com or on Google. It's not listed here, so it might have been added by a vandal. Artyom (talk • contribs) 20:32, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revision needed 

message: Why aren't there separate UEFA Euro 2008 broadcasting rights in England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland? --88.76.233.158 (talk) 13:26, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Broadcasting isn't divided up like that in the UK. Timrollpickering (talk) 21:43, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  United Kingdom 

message: Surely this article would be a perfect place for more in-depth coverage of the blackouts that occurred during the Germany vs Turkey semi-final? It should be moved to UEFA Euro 2008 broadcasting, but to me this seems like the optimum place for it. – PeeJay 22:07, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  TV blackouts during GER-TUR 
Talk:Second Great Migration (African American)

message: ==Untitled==
I think we should combine the Second Great Migration (African American) with the Great Migration (African American) within one article, and differentiate between them within the article.  Otherwise it is too confusing.  Th Great Migration article leads with the total number of migrants for both migrations, but is mostly about the first Migration. I know there is more material for both the first  and the Second Migration.  It would be easier for readers and editors to find and easier for people to contribute if all the material were in one place.  What do you think? --Parkwells (talk) 15:20, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Combine Migration pages and differentiate within article?

message: I think we should combine the Second Great Migration (African American) with the Great Migration (African American) within one article, and differentiate between them within the article.  Otherwise it is too confusing.  Th Great Migration article leads with the total number of migrants for both migrations, but is mostly about the first Migration. I know there is more material for both the first  and the Second Migration.  It would be easier for readers and editors to find and easier for people to contribute if all the material were in one place.  What do you think? --Parkwells (talk) 15:20, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I feel like this is still too small of a section to be able to combine; and, it's able to be more than just migration.  This specific article can connect to Civil Rights in America, and that's a whole new can of beans if you know what I mean.  So, I think that it needs to be fleshed out before we move or connect it.  FUNFUNFUN (talk) 16:24, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: RE: Combine Migration pages and differentiate within article?

message: This article is hit or miss on whether to capitalize 'southern' and its right-angled counterparts. There is probably a Wikipedia standard, but I don't know it.
99.203.28.95 (talk) 04:57, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  capitalization uniformity
Talk:Gimbi

message: Is this page a copright violation? See the discussion at User talk:CorenSearchBot#CorenSearchBot is Broken. -- llywrch (talk) 03:20, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Penstemon digitalis

message: The reference to a finger shape is indirect. The species was originally described as Pentstemon (sic) Digitalis and the specific epithet--the capitalization indicating it is a noun, not an adjective--is a direct reference to the genus Digitalis. In fact the article title is "Pentstemon Digitalis. Fox-Glove-Like Pentstemon": https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/487579#page/180/mode/1up  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.129.117.130 (talk) 22:48, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Specific epithet
Talk:List of current National Hockey League broadcasters

message: There's a startling lack of Bob Cole here.-Wafulz (talk) 03:30, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Better format needed?

message: I know that Michel Langevin is no longer the play-by-play for the Senators game as I think he left for CKAC or another Montreal station. I don't know however the name of the new play-by-play announcer at that station, but I'm removing Langevin.--JForget  20:54, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind I've found it here --JForget  21:01, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: CJRC
Talk:Certified wireless network administrator

message: What organisation is responsible for this certification?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.154.131.202 (talk) 12:32, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Kit Bakke

message: it might be beneficial to to use "she" or "Bakke" instead of Kit. Lalalajane (talk) 03:41, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bakke not Kit

message: I am questioning the use of the phrase that Kit Bakke was a 1950's girl.  Although I'm sure it was not your intention, it seems a bit condescending.  Also, I wonder about the necessity of describing the bread-winning dad and the stay-at home mom.  Is that really important in a Biography of someone?Ossu (talk) 21:47, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Seriously, to a great majority of readers, that term would have no meaning whatsoever. Who's got an idea for a better way to put that? Murderbike (talk) 02:24, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Maybe say something like her parents performed the traditional roles of working father and stay-at-home mother and ... some how this influenced the direction Bakke took in her life. Lalalajane (talk) 22:57, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  a 1950's girl? 

message: I mean it's interesting, but you know...does everybody who was part of Weatherman need to have an article?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.182.183.175 (talk) 08:22, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did this person do anything notable? 

message: An infobox might benefit this article.  It might also help highlight the notability of this individual and her contributions.Historytrain (talk) 16:50, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: An Infobox
Talk:Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology

message: ADEUYI AYODELE OLAWALE ,wishes to apply for reseach M.S.schorlarship programme under the department of material scence aand Engineering.I graduated from Institute of science Laboratory Technology[physics/Electronics Engineering]Lower credit grade, Final Diploma equivalent to BSC/BTECH and Associates member of Nigerian Institute of Science Laboratory Technology[AISLT],IF MY APPLICATION IS GRANTED I WILL BE GREATFUL.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.78.63.66 (talk) 11:26, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  HI
Talk:UEFA European Championship video games

message: Hello! Does anyone know any information about the Euro 2008 videogame? Thanks. --vonusovef (wha?) 04:04, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What about Euro 2008?

message: I couldn't find any sources that the 88 and 92 games exist. Add these entries back if you can find sources:
*Euro'88, by Gremlin Interactive was the first game to replicate the European Football Championship, including only the 8 teams present in the final stage with accurate rosters and stadiums.
*Euro'92, by Gremlin Interactive was the second game to replicate the European Football Championship, including only the 9 teams (with Yugoslavia) present in the final stage with accurate rosters and stadiums.
--Mika1h (talk) 14:06, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: 88 & 92
Talk:USS Wanderer (1857)

message: There's a lot of great information here, but I think that some of the writing needs to be smoothed out a bit. Check the articles in the "Warfare" section at WP:FA to see examples of what we are striving for. Phrases like "after a pleasant visit" and other "chatty" turns of phrase should be phased out, towards making this a more neutral encyclopedia article.  Also, I'm concerned for copyright reasons.  If this information was taken from a US government site, that's fine, but if there's exact wording taken from a copyrighted book, then that needs to be changed immediately.  Other than that though, this is an excellent addition to Wikipedia, and thanks for the work! :) --Elonka 17:58, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Tone

message: Doubt has been cast on whether this is in fact an image of the "Wanderer" of 1857, or an earlier British schooner of the same name which had been wrecked in 1851.  
See message (and excuse the Wikipedia dig) at https://lists.queensu.ca/cgi-bin/listserv/wa?A2=MARHST-L;194ed108.1102
At present no further discussion on that forum. Davidships (talk) 02:20, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: The Image of "Wanderer"

message: Hello all - It seems to me like the two articles USS Wanderer (1857) and The Wanderer (slave ship) ought to be consolidated into one article, because they are both about the same ship, albeit during periods when the ship was put to different uses. Could editors more familiar with the subject matter please comment on this? (Posting this comment on the talk pages for both articles.) Thanks. KConWiki (talk) 19:01, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge - Agree - the ship is the same, and it only confuses issues to have two articles.Parkwells (talk) 17:34, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

text: Merge - Agree - the 2 pages should be merged --Legenderfox (talk) 04:05, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Consolidation of articles?
Talk:Electronics Australia

message: It was certainly very sad to see a great true enthusiast's magazine with an impeccable pedigree watered down to a glossy consumer publication designed for the technically illiterate with too much money.  What once was at home on the technical experimenter's bench was retargeted at the coffee table or doctor's waiting room with predictable results.  Heaven knows what possessed the publisher to make such a idiotic decision.  A saving grace is that at least in Australia we have Silicon Chip which by and large is in the same mould as Electronics Australia.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.167.157.158 (talk) 10:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Very Sad Demise
Talk:Apical ectodermal ridge

message: Sources needed for attention required above SriMesh | talk 04:52, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources
Talk:Network utility

message: I don't see any justification for using a plural article title here.  WP:SINGULAR.  I will move from Network utilities to Network utility and add hatnotes to disambiguate from Network Utility.
Sorry, forgot to sign.  I've made the move. Set theorist (talk) 02:37, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is this article title pluralized? 

message: Hello spray! 
I never, never never seen you before. glad to see you here!
Cheers!
213.59.138.164 (talk) 09:13, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  spray
Talk:Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research

message: I've upgraded the article from "unreferenced" to "badly referenced."  It's a new organization, so truly independent sources basically don't exist.  However, it appears to be a major player, so IMO it's worth a short article.  WhatamIdoing (talk) 21:21, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: The majority of this article is directly lifted from various parts of the CIBMTR website. I've flagged it for now, and will keep chipping away at resolving this issue.
Outoftheazul (talk) 04:45, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Best I can tell, all the text in this edit was copy/pasted from the CIBMTR website. Rolled back to the version before that edit, which shockingly is June 2010. I did a quick search for sources in the intervening 10 years, but didn't come up with much of anything. I'm not doubting the group is noteworthy, I think these types of organizations just don't attract all that much press. Ajpolino (talk) 02:14, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy/Paste Issues
Talk:Southside, Berkeley, California

message: The population density figure is startling, surpassing that of Manhattan.  As a city planninng student and resident of Berkeley, I find it doubtful.  I understand that your number estimate comes from the census, but as Southside is not neatly defined by any census geographic area, there must have been some other type of analysis to produce that figure.  I would further guess that the analysis was flawed.169.229.138.16 (talk) 21:58, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that it is a startling number, but I think when you consider the area being covered, it is a reasonable estimate.  The area mentioned, roughly Bancroft to Dwight, Fulton to Panoramic, is only about 1/6th sq. mi., which with this density amounts to about 5000 people living in the neighborhood.  As a resident of the neighborhood, this sounds pretty reasonable.  As a side note, most of Manhattan is 3-4 floor single homes, only a few portions of it are covered with high rise buildings, but this is the image that comes to mind nonetheless; thus comparing the density to Manhattan can be misleading at best.169.229.69.157 (talk) 07:31, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Population density?

message: I removed the recent addition because it grossly misinterpreted this source multiple times, while the part about Greek life people not knowing basic life skills was inaccurate and completely unsourced.--Jasper Deng (talk) 16:31, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additions by [[User:Rona roti]]
Talk:Naultinus

message: Whoa!This puppy is in dire need of a clean-up... Expect some new additions in the next few weeks. Kotare (talk) 05:04, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: 3 years later I finally got around to doing it! Looks much better I think, a little more work and it could be bumped up the scale to a better "article quality" class.Kotare (talk) 05:47, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

text: Thanks for your input man. I don't know of any published information about the Codfish island Naultinus;I have just talked to a DOC guy who has seen them on the island (they're freaking rare - he saw 3 over a total of 300 hours of searching) and an american biologist who is doing the genetic work on them. I've e-mailed him with a whole bunch of questions, also asking for additional info about the "Yellow lipped Gecko". DOC scientist Rod Hitchmoguh did a big phylogenetic study of NZ geckos like 8 years ago and I'm getting in touch with him to source that.. I'd like to get an image of that cladogram for this article - not quite sure how to create one though but will cross that bridge when I come to it. Will start carving up "Distribution and habitat" and "Taxonomy" once I start collecting resources for the latter section and yeah, it will be a bit tricky. this is really satisfying though, think I might be overdoing it a bit, however, it's late and I have to get up to go to work in 7 hours; might be time to take that "wikiholics test", haha.Kotare (talk) 11:59, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Article needs work

message: It seems to me that the table comparing Hoplodactylus and Naultinus is wrong, it has Hoplodactylus:Arboreal, on foliage Naultinus:Terrestrial, sometimes on tree trunks.  The other way around surely?  The table has shown this for years, am I completely wrong?  Has someone checked all the other entries?  --Tony Wills (talk) 19:02, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The same table is used on the page Hoplodactylus, with the same apparent error.  And from that article it sounds as if it should read "not purely arboreal and will forage on the ground" for "Hoplodactylus" and "Arboreal" for "Naultinus".  If it is to be exactly the same table, then it should just be created in one place and transcluded into both articles so that the tables never get out of sync from local editing.  But I would prefer that the columns were transposed for this article, and put "Naultinus" first. --Tony Wills (talk) 19:15, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who is in the trees?
Talk:T. G. Richards and Company Store

message: The longitude and latitude reported in NRHP infobox differ from those reported in the Elkman infobox generator for the site.  Which are correct?  To get the Elkman output, visit Elkman infobox generator and search on Richards in WA. doncram (talk) 16:43, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Geo-coordinates
Talk:Bolivia, New South Wales

message: why do the correct coords show so far south ? Dave Rave (talk) 00:34, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: had 18 in the coord, but 181 in the info box, silly me didn't see it Dave Rave (talk) 03:27, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  coords 
Talk:Magic mouthwash

message: I can't find any mention of this on the Internet. I think I will delete it. Lou Sander (talk) 03:56, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done! Lou Sander (talk) 18:51, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Snow wash 

message: Some drugs and drug categories are mentioned in the text about the most popular formulation, then again in the list of common ingredients. There was previously inconsistency in making them into links (or not) in either place. I've wikilinked every mention of any drug or drug category in this small section. Though in some small way this "clutters" the section with links, it makes it easier for lay readers to follow all these specialized terms. Lou Sander (talk) 18:51, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Links in Formulations section

message: While there are no studies on Mary's Magic Mouthwash, as a dentist who has prescribed it multiple time and has now had the opportunity to use this myself, I am pleased with the results of usage.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.103.147.15 (talk) 16:26, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The plural of anecdote is not data. 98.119.149.245 (talk) 04:04, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Efficacy
Talk:Badli

message: I don't think a ref be needed to tell a place, a well known industrial area of a city. Still the ref is cited from Delhi Govt, Official web site, that it is a well noted Ind area of North zone of Delhi.
Secondly, all know here that Delhi Engg College is situated at Badli, what a ref is required, Still it is cited fm Wikipedia itself.
: Ashish Bhatnagar (talk) 05:33, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Note:  Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 03:49, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Delhi Addition
Talk:Adhir Kalyan

message: The article states that he was born in 1983, but the imdb page indicates it was 1984. 72.195.189.98 (talk) 08:19, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: DOB

message: Why is Adhir kept on being referenced as Pahud in the article? Is that a nickname? 24.153.219.99 (talk) 01:21, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Pahud?
Talk:My Number One Doctor

message: From this point on, I don't think it is it safe to note the airdate. Scrubs might go into reruns for a bit, and as we all know, that WGA strike might end scrubs as we know, it might be better to leave the airdate not noted from this episode onwards, unless there is a reference stating such. Vinay S. (talk) 06:23, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Airdate