Talk:Law & Order

message: I'm removing this because it's confused and contains information irrelevant to the topic. It starts off with what could be a plot synopsis of any episode but becomes specific enough that it must be talking about a specific episode. It then takes a detour with some commentary on Colombia only to return to the topic. At the very least this needs the commentary stripped and citations for what is otherwise original research. -- BlindWanderer (talk) 23:22, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Not to assume bad faith, but I don't think this is an attempt to be constructive, but to smear prosecutors in general. It has absolutely no value.oknazevad (talk) 10:43, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot section

message: Hi. This message concerns one of the few major continuity errors I've noticed in the original L&O, which is probably why the error was made. The show began in either the 31st or 36st precinct, and may have moved to another precinct, before the 27 (I would have to watch a marathon of the early seasons to verify there was a second precinct before the move to the 27th). I do know that Capt. Cragen refers to working at both the 'three-one' and 'two-seven'  on numerous occasions, but I'm not positive I've seen outside shots where the precinct number 31 is ever shown. Between the precinct changes in early episodes, Captain Cragen's office doesn't change, thus the continuity errors, and the squad changes are never explained (likely because of how early in the series it was). I don't own the early seasons, but I would be willing to try and follow the precinct jumps if no one else can. Thanks! 173.62.8.152 (talk) 00:45, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: its the pilot Scranton (talk) 17:56, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: The 27 was not the first or only precinct L&O took place in

message: Grossly bigotted show that even launched entire studies showing massive bias against conservatives and/pr business people, and looky here on wikipedia and nothing to be heard. What a shock. I'm totally shocked.  And drowning in sarcasm. 68.115.53.79 (talk) 00:09, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: See WP:NOTAFORUM.  Probably should delete or hat this rant.  SkepticalRaptor (talk) 07:07, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  I agree with 68.115.53.79. Why is there a serious lack of discussion about the bias of the television show? Also, I've been a member of Wikipedia for a long time. If something is lacking from an article, it's fair enough to argue for its insertion. I totally agree there is statist bias in the show, beyond conducting legal police work. There are episodes where the police conduct illegal activities toward suspects. Also, the whole issue of people not understanding their "right to remain silent" throughout the show shows how this show is superficial. Throughout the years, I've held the belief this show's primary purpose is to instill fear of the government into people and keep them ignorant of the law. --Cyberman (talk) 07:13, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Where is the bias section?

message: I thought it was standard for most series to have one. 143.92.1.33 (talk) 00:11, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: No 'critical reception' section?

message: The Law segment and Order segment sections of the article both completely lack sources and make numerous unsupported claims with weasel wording (especially use of "usually" and "often"). Furthermore, the sections are excessively detailed and border on cruft. I've put up maintainance tags, but without sources the material should be trimmed significantly. Some guy (talk) 06:49, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: These sections remained unsourced for six months, so I removed them from the article. Some guy (talk) 02:50, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: The "segment" sections

message: Per other info on the first season of "Law & Order", and my memory, S. Epatha Merkerson was a guest star in the episode, 'Mushrooms'. Any particular reason why this is not entered under the 'graph' of characters and actors? Nasknit (talk) 08:00, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Was she playing the same character? If not, then it to ably doesn't warrant mentioning. oknazevad (talk) 19:18, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Law & Order listing of characters & actors

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: here. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Diannaa (talk) 20:11, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright problem removed

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Law & Order. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120923025125/http://www.mercurynews.com/entertainmentheadlines/ci_10868230 to http://www.mercurynews.com/entertainmentheadlines/ci_10868230
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100308110700/http://www.hollywoodreporter.com:80/hr/search/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1000937471 to http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/search/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1000937471
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:05, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: External links modified

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Law & Order. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100111054151/http://www.hollywoodreporter.com:80/hr/search/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1002576393 to http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/search/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1002576393
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:57, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: External links modified

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Law & Order. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110604154844/http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/television/features/e3ifbfdd1bcb53266ad8d9a71cad261604f?pn=1 to http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/television/features/e3ifbfdd1bcb53266ad8d9a71cad261604f?pn=1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:39, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: External links modified

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 9 external links on Law & Order. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100529122032/http://www.mediaspy.org/report/2010/05/15/law-order-cancelled/ to http://www.mediaspy.org/report/2010/05/15/law-order-cancelled/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100717005921/http://www.nbcumv.com/mv/ to https://www.nbcumv.com/mv/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100803195424/http://www.mediaspy.org/report/2010/07/31/us-law-order-is-dead-says-wolf/ to http://www.mediaspy.org/report/2010/07/31/us-law-order-is-dead-says-wolf/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091026022514/http://www.classictvhits.com/tvratings/1994.htm to http://www.classictvhits.com/tvratings/1994.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091109205105/http://www.classictvhits.com/tvratings/1995.htm to http://www.classictvhits.com/tvratings/1995.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100106211716/http://www.classictvhits.com/tvratings/1996.htm to http://www.classictvhits.com/tvratings/1996.htm
*Added archive https://archive.is/2012.06.29-043647/http://abcmedianet.com/web/dnr/dispDNR.aspx?id=052808_06 to http://abcmedianet.com/web/dnr/dispDNR.aspx?id=052808_06
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100131044226/http://abcmedianet.com/web/dnr/dispDNR.aspx?id=051909_05 to http://abcmedianet.com/web/dnr/dispDNR.aspx?id=051909_05
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061215090113/http://www.nyc.gov/html/film/html/locations/sets_law_and_order.shtml to http://www.nyc.gov/html/film/html/locations/sets_law_and_order.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:03, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Law & Order. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041024054944/http://www.nyc.gov/html/film/html/news/091604_commissioner_oliver_presents.shtml to http://www.nyc.gov/html/film/html/news/091604_commissioner_oliver_presents.shtml
*Added  tag to http://www.nydailynews.com/archives/entertainment/1999/04/30/1999-04-30_bratt_leaving__law___order__.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090302143240/http://www.tvguide.com/cheers-jeers/Cheers-Sisto-Lays-8673.aspx to http://www.tvguide.com/cheers-jeers/Cheers-Sisto-Lays-8673.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:43, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Law & Order. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091225174737/http://testpattern.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/18/274549.aspx to http://testpattern.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/18/274549.aspx
*Added  tag to http://insidetv.aol.com/2009/10/22/law-and-order-fictionalizes-taconic-tragedy-is-it-too-soon?icid=main
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:28, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Seems reddit's gone a bit crazy with competing claims to the source of the signature sound. — Nahum Reduta [talk|contribs] 05:56, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Donk donk 

message: Law & Order: The Complete Series boxed set. Pretty sure this is a bootleg release 86.41.149.16 (talk) 14:20, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Home Media 

message: Why is Frank Cosgrove listed as Senior Detective?  The relationship onscreen is not portrayed or documented.  In the new credits, only Hugh Dancy gets a "Starring" credit, even though Donovan listed firstScranton (talk) 14:23, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Frank Cosgrove 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:22, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
* 
You can see the reasons for deletion at the file description pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:52, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion 

message: The redirect Law & Order: New York has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.   Jay 💬 11:55, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Law & Order: New York]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: This quote used as a section title lacks context (and we probably shouldn't use cute quotes as section headers either). Nowhere in the article is this phrase explained, let alone sourced. I think this section has value, but should either be a subsection in Production, or a separate "Controversies" section. --ZimZalaBim talk 22:38, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Ripped from the headlines" 

message: In the first season of Law & Order George Dzundza, Chris Noth, Dann Florek, Michael Moriarty, Richard Brooks and Steven Hill were six of the original cast members. In the next two seasons Noth, Florek, Moriarty, Brooks and Hill are now the five original cast members. In the next season Noth, Moriarty and Hill are now the three remaining original cast members. In the next season Noth and Hill are now the two remaining original cast members. In the next five seasons Hill was the last remaining original cast member of the series. 2601:18C:8000:AAE0:19B6:BAEA:CFD4:112E (talk) 15:54, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Law & Order season 1 and 10 

message: What if season 5 episode "Virtue" aired on November 2, 1994 "Competence" the 9th, "precious the 23rd. season 9 "True North" aired on November 11, 1998 "Scrambled" the 18th, "venom" the 25th, "Punk" December 9. season 11 "Burn Baby Burn" and "Sunday in the Park with Jorge" both aired on November 22, 2000. "Teenage Wasteland" January 24, 2001, "Phobia" February 7, 2001, "A Losing Season" the 14th, "Swept Away" the 21th, "Bronx Cheer" the 28th, "Ego" March 14, "White Lie" the 21st, "Whiplash" April 4, "All My Children " the 18th, "Brother's Keeper" May 2, "School Daze" the 9th, "Judge Dread" the 16th, "Deep Vote" the 23rd. 2601:18C:8000:AAE0:4C1E:2FB3:B1C6:A572 (talk) 15:23, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternative in Law & Order switching episodes