Talk:Gwanggaeto the Great

message: CHINESE GOVERNMENT SHOULD ACCEPT " KORGURYO KINGDOM" AS KOREAN TERRITORY. YOU CANNOT CHANGE HISTORY. HISTORY IS TO LEARN FROM THE PAST, PRESENT, AND FOR THE FUTURE.
WHAT CHINESE GOVERNMENT DOING WITH " NORTHEAST PROJECT" IS VERY VERY STUPID. TRUTH WILL ALWAYS PREVAIL. IT CAN ONLY CREATE FRICTION BETWEEN KOREANS AND CHINESE. 
IN THE END CHINESE WILL LOSE. LIKE TIBET, TAIWAN, CHINA ( WEST COAST PROVINCE) UIGHUR PROVINCE, AND MANCHURIA ( KOREA). THE WORD CHINA OR CHINA LAND IS VERY
SUPERFICIAL LAND ONLY WAY CHINESE GOVERNMENT TO KEEP CONTROL 1.2 BILLION PEOPLE BY HAVING " COMMUNIST REGIME". EVEN COMMUNIST REGIME DON'T TELL THE TRUTH ABOUT
CHINESE HISTORY. CHINESE GOVERNMENT IS KILLING THEMSELVES MAKING THEMSELVES LOOK VERY VERY STUPID. IN THE END KOREANS WILL WIN.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Population6 (talk • contribs) 01:50, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disputed history 

message: some of this seems like someone began to rant about Korean history...especially that huge chunk without references.
--Heero Kirashami (talk) 19:50, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  er... 

message: There is no citation for Gwanggaeto attacking Ainu peoples. Is it implying there were Ainu settlements in Manchuria/Southern Siberia?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rekishiotaku (talk • contribs) 12:24, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ainu? 

message: The title, Gwanggaeto the great has to be changed into Emperor Gwanggaeto since the rulers of Goguryeo were called "Taewang" from the reign of Micheon.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.101.9.93 (talk) 09:52, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The great? 

message: If we see the texts written on the wall of the tombs of Goguryeo, or the stele, we can know that Goguryean rulers used the title, Taewang. So Emperor Gwanggaeto is right.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by World historia (talk • contribs) 10:45, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: No, You are Wrong. The academia, including Korean, consider Goguryeo as Kingdom, Not Empire.--121.167.254.156 (talk) 11:24, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Emperor is right.

message: I undid the recent page move from Gwanggaeto the Great to Emperor Gwanggaeto per WP:COMMONNAME. "Emperor Gwanggaeto" has only two hits with Google Books and only one with Google Scholar.
:
:
--Kusunose 02:41, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent page move 

message: Since people seem to be move-warring in the middle of an RM, I've move-protected the page for a while.  If I see it resume upon expiration of the move protection, I'll block whoever it is.  Use this time to sort out the RM, and note that my protection isn't an endorsement of the this title; I merely think that a page should stay in one place during an RM, and this is where the RM was started.  The Blade of the Northern Lights  (話して下さい) 03:08, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move protected 

message: References added in each section of the paragraphs. Certain paragraphs challenged were cited or removed in case there are no plausible references or any written data. --Mar del Este (talk) 02:32, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: There has been an edit war here that includes multiple anonymous editors inserting the same material. The edit seems to revolve around Korean v. Chinese versions of history. Is one side more accurate, or can the two versions be brought together somehow? Thanks, Aristophanes68 (talk) 19:56, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Obviously, I wasn't implying that all Koreans and all Chinese think the same way, but that the arguments seems to revolve around whether to describe the events and people of Goguryeo as basically Korean or as part of Chinese history. Aristophanes68 (talk) 02:38, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for comment 

message: *Comment Can you please phrase the RfC question more specifically? For example, by giving us two or three different versions to discuss? Seraphim System (talk) 04:38, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Obviously, I wasn't implying that all Koreans and all Chinese think the same way, but that the arguments seems to revolve around whether to describe the events and people of Goguryeo as basically Korean or as part of Chinese history. Aristophanes68 (talk) 02:38, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Threaded discussion

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Gwanggaeto the Great. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160603115730/https://www.aoewd.com/index.php to https://www.aoewd.com/index.php
*Added archive https://archive.is/20121205023224/http://www.megapass.co.kr/~hsg1000/b60.htm to http://www.megapass.co.kr/~hsg1000/b60.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:58, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: but was defeated both times
change to:
but were defeated both times68.40.122.133 (talk) 16:06, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  minor fix 

message: westen = western 2603:8000:D300:D0F:C066:DFF9:D743:49D7 (talk) 22:07, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Tollens (talk) 22:23, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 23 April 2023