lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Passport Canada

message: *To my untrained eye, it looks like this article needs a cleanup.  The factual information, so far as I know, is correct, but the presentation's rather disjointed.  Perhaps sections on history, respectibility, security features, and recent news? Majromax 19:38, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: If you want to do that, knock yourself out. --Spinboy 20:07, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: *Wow, nice work as-is.  I plead lack of sleep for a reason to not edit now, but just the sectioning made an impressive visual improvement to the page. --Majromax 22:08, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: * Proposed to merge Canadian Passport Order into this page. Seems unlikely that one will be viewed without the other, as they dovetail into each other. There's already significant overlap (this page duplicates everything of substance in Canadian Passport Order). I came to update news concerning the passport order, and frankly it's a pain to have to do so twice in two articles. Also, although both this page and Canadian Passport Order discuss the same events, the information is presented in a slightly discrepant manner. I think it would be more efficient to just discuss the Order as one subsection of the larger article on Passport Canada, and this would ensure that there are no discrepancies between two overlapping articles about the Order.Rumplefurskin (talk) 14:05, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merge

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: official site. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 23:46, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Magnuson Act

message: if the magnuson act made it possible for 105 Chinese to come to America, where is the difference to the Chinese Exclusion Act?
I'm quoting from wikis Chinese Exclusion Act now "The Chinese Exclusion Act, signed into law May 6, 1882, followed revisions made in 1880 to the Burlingame Treaty of 1868. The revisions to the treaty allowed the US to suspend immigration and Congress acted quickly to implement the suspension.
The act excluded all but 105 Chinese immigrants per year to the United States for 10 years."
Somebody please checks it? Kinda fishy to me.
:I've added a source to the article. Immigration levels in those days were set based on the national heritage of those in the country in 1880s, and there were few Chinese in the U.S. then. -Will Beback 07:10, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Libertarian perspectives on capital punishment

message: Why does this page even exist? Shouldn't it be folded into a page on libertarianism?
:Ideally, yes. But the page on libertarianism would probably be about 70 pages long if we included all the subarticles (economic views, legal views, views on rights, anarcho-capitalism, minarchism, and views on intellectual property, Objectivism, privatizing natural resources, foreign policy, immigration and so on). As a compromise, the most important issues get a paragraph (or a bit more) and the less important ones get links to pages like this one with a sentence summarizing it in the main article.  If you have a better idea, I'd love to hear it, because this really isn't a perfect system. Dave (talk) 03:42, Apr 22, 2005 (UTC)
;This links from the section Libertarianism in the USA->issues->capital punishment. I believe the article would need to have a purely American subject and it is not an "issue" with the article. Warmallis0n (talk) 08:06, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  2005 comments

message: I think it would be good to talk about left-libertarian perspectives on capital punishment in the United States in this article. Left-libertarianism is not as prominent or well-known as right-libertarianism in the US, though, so I think the article should still focus more on right-libertarian perspectives. I also think this article could use some expansion, and more citations. Lastly, I don't think the article entirely follows Wikipedia's WP:NPOV guideline. The article and its tone is also written more like an essay in some ways. I put a NPOV template at the top of the page. JoeSmoe2828 (talk) 21:59, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Issues with article
Talk:Intel Ireland

message: Media Alert: Intel Starts High-Volume EUV Production in Ireland. Rjluna2 (talk) 17:58, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Media Alert: Intel Starts High-Volume EUV Production in Ireland 

message: Press Kit of Intel Brings Intel 4 Technology, High-Volume EUV Production to Europe. Rjluna2 (talk) 18:58, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intel Brings Intel 4 Technology, High-Volume EUV Production to Europe
Talk:Miksa Fenyő

message: I only found 4 hits with google - does he need this much detail? Biography entries like 'Miksa turned 80' seem a bit excessive. Could someone who knows more about him than me trim it down please? - Inebriatedonkey
-Due to the Cold War, including almost 45 years of information suppression on the part of the Stalinists and pseudo-Communists, information about famous historic Hungarian persons is only now beginning to appear in Western intellectual culture. That said, perhaps you should place this name in its Hungarian order on google, yahoo, alta-vizsla, etc... Input = Fenyõ Miksa . Let me know what you find and think. - Lightning-Feather 04:43, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Neo-Luddism

message: I've run across neo-luddite sympathies motivated by fear of a singularity or gray-goo type event. This is mostly just the logical extreme of the standard anti-techonology arguments, but it might be worth a mention, as some people are opposed not to specific technological improvements but utimately a sudden and pronounced loss of our control over them.
:: I think we should not pour the baby out with the bathwater. There is a lot of tech that is useful and harmless. The problem starts where access to bank accounts is concerned. All events in tech can be faked and that includes transfers, payments, and invoices. Stick with cash in normal day to day activities. The IT architecture is very costly in terms of money, time, and cyber insurance. We should not be hoodwinked by the software vendors who are the main beneficiaries. No doubt we need to wind it back, but not all. 2001:8003:A070:7F00:8862:E45A:8668:6185 (talk) 02:32, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Anti-singularity/gray-goo motivations

message: The content of this article seems overly focused on the Unabomber, clearly a figure that does not highlight the positive qualities a neo-Luddite might have. While Ted was most certainly anti-technology, why is he the most prominent “philosopher” of neo-Luddism in this article. While I agree he should be mentioned and discussed, the quantity of Ted focused content in this article would make the casual reader think that all neo-luddites share an affinity with Kaczinsky. Patdmulroy99 (talk) 23:51, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ted Kaczinsky 

message: The article currently says that Luddism "opposes all forms of technology." This contrasts with the Wikipedia article on the movement, which says, " movement of English textile workers which opposed the use of certain types of cost-saving machinery...."  Our article should be changed.Kdammers (talk) 14:19, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Luddites
Talk:Waterfall

message: As best as I can tell, the researchers section is totally useless/not at all in encyclopedic tone.  Does anyone object to deletion? JeanLackE (talk) 15:58, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Researchers 

message: Hello all! 
This article has been chosen as this week's effort for WP:Discord's #team-b-vital channel, a collaborate effort to bring Stub and Start class Vital articles up to a B class if possible, similar to WP:Articles for Improvement. This effort will run for up to seven days, ending early if the article is felt to be at B-class or impossible to further improve. Articles are chosen by a quick vote among interested chatters, with the goal of working together on interesting Vital articles that need improving.
Thank you! -- ferret (talk) 00:03, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Team-B-Vital Improvement Drive
Talk:Color agnosia

message: We could probably redirect this page to agnosia, which is a general page on different type of agnosia.
FTA "Failure to treat color agnosia may lead to brain cancer" This is not accurate. Failure to investigate may lead to late diagnosis of brain cancer.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jdanzola (talk • contribs) 16:08, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: redirect?
Talk:George E. Studdy

message: The following links appear to be a trivial set of commercial links failing ELNO. I have removed the links section on the basis of it becoming a linkfarm. If you are desperately keen that any of these websites get re-added to the article, please include a clear rationale here or integrate the link with an explanation of its significance in the body of the article.
Ash (talk) 17:44, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links 
Talk:Jim Morris

message: anyone have any info about a controversy he was in near the end of his stint in tampa? i think it involved religion.....
:A quick Google serach didn't find any information on it but will do some research. Zerbey 21:49, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversy

message: I heard this man speak last night. He's the best speaker I ever heard. Truly inspirational. He's also very funny. He's so good it seemed like only fifteen minutes but he actually talked for over an hour.Rlevse 10:15, 9 August 2007
: Dude, that's awesome. Yesitsnot (talk) 05:36, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Speaker

message: I'd like to know how to re-direct to this page from a search for "Jimmy Morris." I think this is valid because he is often called Jimmy, the main page lists it in quotes as a nickname, yet searching for "Jimmy Morris" doesn't bring up this page. Can someone take care of this and/or tell me how to do so? Michaeloz 05:12, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Added -- JHunterJ (talk) 15:27, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect request

message: he turned down the yankees to sign with the brewers?
what's the story behind that one? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.116.134.29 (talk) 09:00, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That's highly likely. Good job. Yesitsnot (talk) 05:43, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  turned down the yankees?
Talk:Physical schema

message: How about some good examples of both logical and subsequent physical data models?
"it was generally accepted that Oracle's architecture is best suited to enterprise & larger implementations," - This is opinion
This page appears to be biased toward Oracle DBMS' and provides a very simplistic view of Physical Data Models.  No consideration is given to DBMS function or application use and the impact on PDM design.   
Examples being OLTP (OnLine Transaction Processing) PDM's, EDW (Enterprise Data Warehouse) PDM's, OLAP PDM's or Data Mart PDM's.
"There are a great many other RDBMS systems out there, but these tend either to be legacy databases or used within academia such as universities or further education colleges." - Not fact.  Opinion.  Companies such as E-bay, facebook, tagged, K-Mart, Wal-Mart, Verizon, AT&T, and a number of banks all use DBMS technologies not mentioned in this article.
IBM's DB2 and UDB, Teradata's DBMS, SQL Server, Netizza, Greenplum, MySQL all have different features which impacts which type of physical attribute may be represented in a PDM.  Even within Oracle, there are two distinct offerings; Exadata for large scale DBMS installation and the basic Oracle DBMS offering.
The reference to Oracle should be removed from this page as should the references to the other DBMS'.  The article should focus instead upon purpose and types of PDM: IDEF1X, IE, DM, etc. and perhaps talk about the methods or tools available to create a PDM.
This page seems to be more a discussion or even a sales presentation for RDBMS instances, not a discussion about the physical data model.  Discussions should probably include the purpose of a physical model, the transformation of the logical model into a physical model, resoultion of sub-types, implementation of data types, physical instantiation of objects, space allocations, volumetrics and planning for growth.  Lots of topics to discuss, not which RDBMS implementation we use.  Also, physical models are not exclusive to relational modeling, so maybe this should also be more specific to a Relational Physical Model or the text should be more generic to include other types of databases, such as hierarchical.  Dan Galvin 14:49, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed the opinion pieces. prat (talk) 06:15, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opinion (removed) 
Talk:German Armed Forces enlisted rank insignia

message: Should the English translations be along side, for reference.  I don't know German, so this is on someone elses plate.--Mtnerd 21:37, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)

message: I always thought that Fähnrich was an ensign.  That would line up more with the note that a Fähnrich is an officer candidate AND it makes sense from an etymological view point: the root of 'Fähnrich' is 'Fahne', which is German for 'flag', similar to 'ensign', which along with being a rank is also another word for 'flag'. And just as a sidenote, Ensign Hornblower (from the Horatio Hornblower series) is translated as Fähnrich Hornblower (I know that doesn't actually prove anything, but I thought it'd be an interesting fact.) Cheers YggdrasilsRoot 18:56, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fähnrich translation
Talk:Saint seiya

message: Saint Seiya "cavalieri dello zodiaco" risulta essere divisa nei seguenti capitoli: 
- Galaxian War (La Guerra Galattica) [manga-anime]
- Sanctuary (Al Grande Tempio) [manga-anime]
- Asgard (Le nevi di Asgard)[solo anime]
- Blue Warrior (nevi del nord) [solo manga e riguarda Hyoga/Cristal]
- Poseidon (Negli abissi del mare) [manga-anime]
Oltre a questi vi sono anche gli anime :
- La Dea Discordia (Eris)
- L'Ardente scontro degli dei (Asgard)
- La Leggenda dei Guerrieri Scarlatti (Apollo)
- L'Ultima Battaglia (Satana)
- La dea Artemide
*To let you know, we already have Saint Seiya. Kappa 21:51, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mawlid

message: The sources clearly state that the shia popularised the mawlid. I see constant dilution of this assertion by vandals who change the wording, while unashamedly retaining the citations, even if it clearly contradicts the sources. Please stop or I will report you. 1.144.107.218 (talk) 06:11, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stop sunni-washing 

message: --2.50.232.179 (talk) 20:17, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maulid An Nabi was given as a holiday or celebrated in school in India and UAE mostly . The Present announced to celebrate mawlid an nabi in urdu also said as milad un nabi . 

message: I have recently removed an inclusion by a relatively new editor     due to undue weight (WP:RSUW) one author's, Nico Kapteins hypothesis. I think such undue weight makes neutrality (WP:NPOV) impossible in the article. Especially since his hypothesis is already summarized in the paragraph below. Indrooooz (talk) 01:20, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undue Weight on Nico Kapteins "hypothesis" 

message: This is highly problematic: 
“The history of this celebration goes back to the early days of Islam when some of the Tabi‘un began to hold sessions in which poetry and songs composed to honour Muhammad were recited and sung to the crowds.”
Because it deceives the ignorant reader into thinking that “poetry and songs” were recited in that particular day, as a celebration by the Tabi’un. While that is obviously not the case at all, poetry in his honor was recited the whole year around, there is nothing proven from the authentic Sunnah of the prophet Muhammad ﷺ nor the authentic sunnah of the predecessors that they took part in this celebration on this particular day. 
On the authority of the mother of the faithful, Aisha (ra), who said:
The Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said, “He who innovates something in this matter of ours (i.e., Islam) that is not of it will have it rejected (by Allah).” [Bukhari & Muslim] In another version in Muslim it reads: “He who does an act which we have not commanded, will have it rejected (by Allah).”
https://sunnah.com/nawawi40:5
Allah ﷻ says in Ma’idah verse 3: 
“….This day I have perfected for you your and completed my favor upon you and have approved for you Islam as religion…” Anon1777 (talk) 16:56, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a day celebrated at the time of the prophet ﷺ nor in the times of the Salaf as Salih (righteous predecessors). 

message: "Most denominations of Islam approve of the commemoration of Muhammad's birthday" The citation number [7] for this ironically states in the abstract that most in fact do not approve, and the second citation [8] does not refer to a primary resource regarding the religion of Islam but instead a broadly vague text which generally discusses all religions. The quoted claim is categorically false, a simple youtube or google search will completely invalidate it. The Prophet (pbuh) implicitly disapproved of large festival-esq celebrations other than the two Eids (Sunan Abī Dāwūd 1134) 74.215.221.14 (talk) 02:34, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  False Information
Category talk:User fa

message: I'm looking for an editor that reads Farsi who could verify the Farsi links on Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.  Another editor has questioned the links because they are not written in English, and the easiest way to end the controversy (and remove the  tag) is to have them verified.  I would be more than happy to offer my own services factchecking or finding sources on any entry in exchange.  Thanks! Vir4030 20:19, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's Farsi Links 

message: bejayin ke samteh chap "fa" ra bezari, bezar samteh rast.
e.g
This user speaks farsi   [fa]
not  [fa] This user speaks farsi
because farsi is a right to left written language.
--• Storkian • 18:13, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  REQUIREMENT
Talk:Flag of Samoa

message: The flag of German Samoa was not the first Samoan flag. In the 19th century, a nominally independent Samoan kingdom was recognised by Germany, the UK and the US. There was a Samoan flag by 1873, described as "a red flag with a white star". (see mention here, p.20) Aridd (talk) 19:51, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Earlier flag 

message: Samoa was under NZ military occupation, not "the control of NZ-forces".Royalcourtier (talk) 06:00, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  NZ occupation
Talk:Mesolect

message: Here's the opening sentence:
:A mesolect is a register whose character falls somewhere between the prestige of the acrolect and the informality of the basilect
If I hadn't just looked at some related articles, I would have had no idea, after reading that sentence, whether this is about styles of clothing or religious worship or schools for instruction in French cooking or military parades or what. Michael Hardy 22:33, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Instantnood, et al./Proposed decision

message: Neutrality recently proposed this: Given that this is generally a content matter and the dispute seems to have died down in recent weeks, I move to close.  I'm not sure what a motion to close entails, but I'm hoping the committee will issue some findings before dismissing this case.  I also strongly disagree with the statement that this is purely a content matter and the suggestion that the content debate has been resolved.
Granted, there are disputes about content going on that the ArbCom is not expected to get involved in. However, this case is in fact (at least partly) about policy: Do the naming conventions, for example, mean anything? Are they policy? Can they be enforced, and, if so, how? Does the creation of a large number of polls constitute a disruption of WP as alleged in the complaint? Etc. Those are clearly not content issues, they merely were sparked by an underlying content debate.
That debate has not "died down in recent weeks".  Rather, it was unilaterally abandoned by User:Instantnood while this case is pending. As outlined above on this talk page, it would set a rather worrying precedent if a user could be forced to abstain from an ongoing debate by initiating an arbitration request against him, while others carry on what they were doing unchanged. The lull in the debate is just that, a temporary interruption for the sake of the arbitration case. Dismissing the case by saying that the debate has gone away will likely not solve anything. If the case were to be dismissed without any findings or actions taken, the debate could easily flare up again.  We could be stuck in another infinite cycle: debate rages, arbitration is requested, dispute is put on halt by reasonable parties, case is dismissed because there seemingly is no dispute, parties start to engage in dispute again; rinse and repeat.  This could be avoided if the ArbCom were to make explicit what lessons should be learned from this episode. --MarkSweep 17:33, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Re: Motion to close
Talk:Brakspear Brewery

message: Im not 100% sure that triple and organic are ales as this is never stated explicitly- pypex
Yes, they are both ales. -Cheeselog3000 20:47, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Ales?

message: Should this not be under Brakspear Brewery? --Stlemur 04:23, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name