Talk:Qutb Minar complex

message: This page need to be merged with Qutub Minar or removed --NEWUSER|CARPEDIEM (talk)  12:49, May 22, 2005 (UTC)
:Nope, I don't see why. There's a substantial article over there.--Bobak 20:53, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: obviously, this name is used only in the article in "current science". You cannot find it in "Current Contents" or the "Web of Science". There must be a  more familiar name for this kind of rust (delta-FeOOH). Plehn 16:17, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misawite 

message: i feel that the iron pillar, being the most amazing and curious wonders of the world, shall be demerged from this article and started as an separate one.
also it sometimes tends to give a feeling that both the minarets are somewhat related (to the ignorants).
the article of qutub complex shall be merged with Qutub Minar with a mention of iron pillar, but the iron pillar deserves a separate article in its own headings. anyways lookin forward to ur suggestions.
nids 20:17, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  different page for iron pillar 

message: I believe that the correct spelling is Qutub and not Qutb as used in this article. Would welcome opinions on this before someone makes a change.
:Since it is not an english word and is based upon a person's name, both are prevalent -- Lost(talk) 09:41, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Qutb or Qutub? 

message: "...despite harsh weather. Its unusually good corrosion resistance appears to be due to a high phosphorus content, which together with favorable local weather conditions..."
This statement is a bit contradictory. Does anyone have an idea of whether the weather is good or bad there?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.110.150.67 (talk) 19:46, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whether the weather will whither 

message: Note:  Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 04:05, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Delhi Addition 

message: It has been discovered that this book:
*Gupta, Om. Encyclopaedia of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh. Gyan Publishing House, 2006. , 9788182053892. 
Contains significant amounts of material plagiarized from Wikipedia articles. (Some other books from the same publisher also have this problem). There is no practical way of determining which material came from Wikipedia, and which came from other sources. Further, widespread plagiarism is an indication of poor scholarship. For those reasons, and according to Wikipedia policy, WP:CIRCULAR, I will deleting all citations to the book. However I will not delete the material that cites it, as there's no indication that the material is inaccurate. For more background, see WP:RSN#Circular references: Gyan Publishing and ISHA Books, or the archive after it goes there.   Will Beback  talk   22:53, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Encyclopaedia of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh

message: Hello,
I have changed the following sentence:
However, many historians were unanimous regarding the fact that Qutb ud-Din Aibaq like many other Muslim rulers, had a pathological bigotry and distaste towards henotheistic values, and intolerance on cultures considered anathema in Islamic dogma, which had impelled him to vandalise those historic monuments.
This is because the source does not mention "pathological bigotry", "vandalise", etc. Also, the language used seems anachronistic and may fall under WP:NPOV and WP:Label. The source is actually a blog post disputing mainstream historians' account, I am not sure it is really worthy of inclusion in the first place seeing as the article has generally good standards of sourcing everywhere else.
183.89.30.247 (talk) 05:23, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Pathological bigotry" 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Qutb complex. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101214044938/http://archnet.org/library/sites/one-site.jsp?site_id=7605 to http://www.archnet.org/library/sites/one-site.jsp?site_id=7605
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:21, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: It is requested to the administrators to make the page at least semi protected. We can watch repeated editing without sources in this page. kindly see few last editings. pl make it correct. Pinakpani (talk) 16:14, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chance of Vandalizm 

message: I undid this move, because Qutab is not the most common spelling in reliable sources, or elsewhere, for that matter (see WP:COMMONNAME).
Google Books search results for:
* "Qutab complex" -wikipedia: 186
* "Qutub complex" -wikipedia: 1030
* "Qutb complex" -wikipedia: >3000
The Archaeological Survey of India also uses "Qutb". A discussed move is better than a unilateral move in this situation. Feel free to file a move request at Wikipedia:Requested moves. utcursch | talk 22:19, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: utcursch My bad! I agree.  Thank you for correcting it. Hisham (talk) 01:32, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title