Template talk:WikiProject Catholicism

message: Admin, please changed "Roman Catholic Church" to just "Catholic Church." This is more accurate since "Roman Catholic" means only the Latin Church and the project encompasses East & West. CanonLawJunkie (talk) 15:09, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit request

message: Catholicism 101 was not formed from the Christianity project. Dominick (TALK) 17:59, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: earlier comment

message: If one interprets "is a subproject of" to mean "spawned from" or "spun off from", then the above comment is germane.  However, if one interprets "is a subproject of" to mean "is logically a subordinate component of" based on the inherent epistemological structure of the two concepts "Catholicism" and "Christianity", then it would make sense to have "WikiProject Catholicism" be a subproject of "WikiProject Christianity".
We have defined WP:AZTEC to be a subproject of WP:MESO which is a subproject of WP:Pre-Columbian.  That's not a chronological ordering, it's a logical (epistemological) ordering.
The text of Template:WikiProject makes a plea that WikiProjects not be "orphans".  I think this is an unnecessary concern.  There is some value in indicating the logical hierarchial relationships between WikiProjects but I'm not sure that doing so is as important as the author of the WikiProject template seems to think it is.
Thus, I don't much care whether or not the logical relationship of Catholicism and Christianity is embodied in the descriptions of the two projects since it is really a second-order issue.  So I'll not work very hard to push my POV on this one.
I'm also tired of having every little thing contested.  It's just not worth that much effort.  If it's important to people to not have WP:Catholicism 101 be a subproject of WP:X, then fine - let it go.
--Richard 19:56, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Depends on your definition of "subproject" 

message: The papal emblem seems to appear as "HAZ COM" in the current version of the template.  This seems to have begun when the template was shrunk down recently - for some reason the picture didn't scale down further.  Any ideas why?  I like Centrx's version - I'm all for keeping templates small - but it looks rather odd right now.  I'm using Firefox 1.5, do other browsers render it the same?  I'm not with the project so I hesitate to "fix" it.  Thanks, Walkerma 07:41, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem with icon? 

message: Hi. Someone could please give me the details of this class used in this template, class="messagebox -talk". Specially the bgcolor and the border color. Thanks again. Mauro do Carmo 12:02, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've just found this other class, class="messagebox disputed metadata", if someone know how I can see the css of those two classes, and let me know, I would appreciate. Thanks again. Mauro do Carmo 12:45, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Class= "messagebox" 

message: Does anyone else agree that the image in the banner should not have a black background? From the  of the image, it looks like someone deleted the original image (which I remember did not have the black background) and it was replaced as quickly as possible, but with a black background. I propose changing the image file to :File:Emblem_of_the_Papacy_SE.svg, which would look like this:

-shirulashem(talk) 00:44, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes I agree with you, it is better like it was above. Please somebody change it back. - Yorkshirian (talk) 15:20, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

text: Done. - Trevor MacInnis (Contribs) 16:12, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

text: The reason it has it on that page is because that page is the actual project banner template itself. Take a look at the Template Documentation on that page, under the "About this template" section. -shirulashem(talk) 23:57, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I see. Thank you.Pollinosisss (talk) 00:35, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: Admin, please change the "IMAGE_LEFT" parameter to: Emblem of the Papacy SE.svg  -shirulashem(talk)
:Done. - Trevor MacInnis (Contribs) 16:12, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit Request 

message: Template:Project_Catholicism contains a project banner. Only talk pages should have them right? Could an admin please remove it? Thanks, Pollinosisss (talk) 14:07, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The reason it has it on that page is because that page is the actual project banner template itself. Take a look at the Template Documentation on that page, under the "About this template" section. -shirulashem(talk) 23:57, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I see. Thank you.Pollinosisss (talk) 00:35, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another Edit Request 

message: that is the end of this article. Here you'll find some sites that we think you'll appreciate, just click the links over  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.190.61.7 (talk) 22:46, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Um, I'm afraid I don't actually understand this comment? Could you be a bit clearer please? John Carter (talk) 22:51, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  quinceanera dress lynnwood wa 

message: Could someone temporarily remove the full protection from this template so that I could be merge in the Canon Law project? I would leave instructions on how to fix this, but it would be easier for me to temporarily tweak the template if possible. Thanks! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 02:42, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: This would require an admin to do...however, the 'normal' way to accomplish this would be to edit Template:WikiProject Catholicism/sandbox to the desired form, and then ask an admin to 'subst' it to the live template. Revent (talk) 02:52, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: True, I forgot to even check that out. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 03:17, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

text: . I have simply copied the content from the sandbox into the template. Ping me if it is not right. JohnCD (talk) 10:56, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I just noticed on a couple pages that there seems to be quite a few red linked WikiProject Catholicism categories being generated. Someone might want to take a look at that. I was going to create them but since there has been some recent changes to this template I wasn't sure if that was intended. See article as an example.Kumioko (talk) 03:26, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request 

message: I have created the misssing categories like :Category:Catholicism articles needing attention to structure but looking at the numbers of articles in those categories it looks like the template is going a bit over the top. Agathoclea (talk) 16:28, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I turned off the "Display Start" so it will only show on the B-Class articles. Otherwise, 5,000+ articles are too hard to whittle down! Funandtrvl (talk) 00:34, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  various categories 

message: Something isn't working right with this template. When using class=B, it shows up as C-Class. Ardric47 (talk) 14:54, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Class problem 

message: "Wikipedia:WikiProject Catholicism/tasks" under "Catholicism task list:" should be removed. It is a non working link.
OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 04:47, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the  template. What if it was meant to be created? —cyberpower ChatOnline 07:45, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  Finally found the right "To-do" page for the template. Funandtrvl (talk) 00:25, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 24 July 2014 

message: Replace
 
 |TODO_LINK  = Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Catholicism/to do
to
 |TODO_LINK  = Wikipedia:WikiProject Catholicism/to do
per WP:NS. Sawol (talk) 13:56, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  TODO_LINK 

message: Change
: |TF_1_LINK        = Wikipedia:WikiProject Catholicism/Canon law Task Force
to
: |TF_1_LINK        = Wikipedia:WikiProject Catholicism/Catholic canon law task force
-
Change
: |TF_1_NAME        = the Canon Law task force
to
: |TF_1_NAME        = the Catholic canon law task force
-
Change
: |TF_1_LINK   = Wikipedia:WikiProject Catholicism/Canon law Task Force
: |TF_1_NESTED = Canon law
to
: |TF_1_LINK   = Wikipedia:WikiProject Catholicism/Catholic canon law task 
: |TF_1_NESTED = Cath. canon law
The task force has been recently renamed. Veverve (talk) 15:52, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Why are changes like this not being made in the sandbox first? This will avoid code blobs clogging up the talk page. I've synchronised it for you: it hadn't been touched since 2014. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 16:18, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

text: sorry if the above came across as brusque. Please could you make your changes to the sandbox (linked above) and then reactivate the request? This is also to ensure there are no mistakes, because I think there is a word missing in your request. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 11:47, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  done. Veverve (talk) 13:20, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 14:55, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 11 November 2021