lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Touch rugby union

message: Grinner, can you put this up for speedy deletion?
: Any page which is requested for deletion by the original author, provided the author reasonably explains that it was created by mistake, and the page was edited only by its author.
I think the situation we have now, with Touch_rugby redirected to touch football is much much better. Anyone who plays touch rugby calls it touch rugby, thus, touch football is really where they want to go! All we need to do is explain there are non codified varients of the game.
The problem with touch rugby, wasnt simply its title, it was duplication of the content. This page will only encourage that to happen again. Also, there is  no such thing as touch "rugby union" :) POds 06:24, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok i'll do it POds 05:17, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Chevrolet S-10

message: I would like to see more info on the available styles (like the LS) and what the differences were.
HOW MANY S10 STEPSIDE PICKUPS WERE BUILD IN 2001, RED IN COLOR  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.201.235.58 (talk) 22:14, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info on available styles 

message: I propose that this page be merged with Chevrolet S-10 as these two products are so closely related, unless the technology and design of the two vehicles are significantly different.  
Rrostie (talk) 01:11, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose - The design is significantly different: The S-10 is a pickup truck and primarily a work vehicle while the S-10 Blazer is a truck-based station wagon and is primarily a family vehicle. They're as different as the Chevelle and the El Camino. Sincerely, SamBlob (talk) 02:21, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

text: Support - The pickup and the SUV are very closely related as the nominator mentioned. Also, the pickup had three different body styles (single cab, space cab, dual cab) that are quite different in themselves so including the three- and five-door SUVs would hardly be of harm. OSX (talk • contributions) 12:58, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

text: Oppose per Samblob. Additionally, while the nominee mentions the fact that it was related to the Chevrolet S-10, he overlooks the connection to the original Chevrolet Blazer. ---------User:DanTD (talk)  14:34, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

text: Oppose - The design is significantly different: I own a S-10 Blazer and know the S-10 Pickup as well. There are several significant differences even pointed out in the Service Manual and the Drivability and Emissions Control Manual. There are mechanical differences and the electrical systems differ as well. Body differs and options are not the same. Then there is also the name: S-10 Blazer is only used for the SUV style while the pickup is never referenced as Blazer. error_401 (talk) 21:42, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger Proposal S-10 Blazer

message: The article on the EV is largely unsourced. A WP:BEFORE does not show that this vehicle has been the subject of significant coverage on its own. Finally, the criteria of WP:PAGEDECIDE seem to argue in favor of a merger with the main article. Accordingly, I propose a cleanup of the unsourced content and subsequent merge with Chevrolet S-10. JBchrch talk 22:06, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose; notability as the world's first electic pickup truck. I've added some references in support. Klbrain (talk) 08:27, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

text: ya 2601:681:4201:CDC0:E972:E39B:F5F3:A728 (talk) 14:29, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Closing, with no merge, given the uncontested objection and no support. Klbrain (talk) 12:07, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Chevrolet S-10 EV]] into [[Chevrolet S-10]] 

message: When should they be replaced ? 166.199.168.4 (talk) 08:58, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coil packs on 2.2 engine
Talk:Rupert Jee

message: Does anyone know anything about this?  He hasn't been on for so long has something happened to him? 71.169.67.54 07:50, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: One of the people he was messing with got mad and pulled a knife out on him, so now he doesn't do those segments anymore. -- POWERSLAVE 06:25, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow, do you have a source for that?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.215.209.148 (talk) 06:29, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why hasn't he been on The Late Show for so long? 
Talk:Milliampere-hour

message: Any objections to this article being moved to Milliampere-hour instead of the abbreviated Milliamp-hour? LX 06:58, September 7, 2005 (UTC)
Why not merge this with Ampere-hour in fact? LHOON
:Good idea. It is done. --Heron 21:12, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:The New Scooby-Doo Movies

message: Would it be possible to include complete information (perhaps in the table?) as to which of the special guests were voiced by themselves, rather than by some other voice actor? At the moment, there is only partial information in the Notes and the overview.  StephenBuxton 15:54, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: People are requesting to merge the episode guide of "The New Scooby Doo Movies" with the main page of "The New Scooby Doo Movies". I do not think this is right because it would make the main page absolutely massive! Please consider my suggestion. Thx! User:Lv123jv456 22:29, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: What "people"? Where? Dr.Who (talk) 12:12, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Request

message: I think I saw another speacial guest. PLEASE REPLY TO THIS QUESTION/COMMENT --Hello, I'm a Wikipedian! (talk) 17:40, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  About this 

message: Since there will be no more episodes of this in the foreseeable future, it's reasonable to merge back the episode list.  I'll do so in the next week if no-one objects.  The Rambling Man (talk) 19:28, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger 

message: The series has ended production in 1973 since the series only lasted for 2 seasons. I think that the episodes would be transferred to the main article where it can fit in one page since there are not too many episodes. 47.33.102.18 (talk) 18:40, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[List of The New Scooby-Doo Movies episodes]] into [[The New Scooby-Doo Movies]]
Talk:Scooby-Doo and Scrappy-Doo (1979 TV series)

message: The most obviously missing part of this article is about the complete failure of this concept and in general how badly this show sucked. As well it could delve into how "adding a cute new character" to shows is an indicator that they have already failed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.93.14.152 (talk) 14:10, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suckage and Failure
Talk:The 13 Ghosts of Scooby-Doo

message: Can you really say someone as young as flim-flam is really a con artist? a scamp or trickster, maybe, but 'con artist' implies criminality.
I'd say so. Flim-Flam is constantly looking for ways to profit by bamboozling and fooling people. 74.131.12.239 (talk) 03:45, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Con Artist? 

message: While he is never named, the Travel Agent is the one who sends the gang on the ghost voyage, and he's later revealed to be the captain. I think that qualifies him better as the main ghost villain in this episode. Edit? Evilwillhunting (talk) 03:47, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ship of Ghouls - Main Ghost? 

message: Wasn't this show left at a cliffhanger? I've always felt there was a missing episode. There had to be more then 13 planned cause if you count them only 12 ghost were returned to the chest. Who was the thirteenth and why was it never captured and what happened to the episode? JamesAlan1986 (talk-contribs) 09:06, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cliffhanger?
Talk:Qantas Flight 1

message: The ATSB report contains several photographs of the accident. I am unsure as to the copyright status, but they would be very useful in illustrating the article. Other photographs were taken by a Qantas pilot and are widely available on the web. --Jumbo 07:23, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photograph 

message: The kangaroo route is a term to denote flights between Europe and Australasia; these flights generally have a stopover along the Southeast Asia flight corridor. Flights along this route are considered to generate high yield for airlines; this is due to the large population of European ancestry in Australia and New Zealand, along with the long distances involved. However, because of agreements between the various governments along the route, the number of airlines allowed to fly the route has traditionally been restricted. The name refers not only to the kangaroo, native to Australia, but also to the fact that the journey was traditionally accomplished with at least two "hops" due to the stopovers, alluding to the kangaroo's means of locomotion. --Jumbo 07:49, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hops on the [[Kangaroo Route]] 

message: This article is still a jumble of general info on Qantas' flagship route/flight number and specific info about a particular incident that happened to an aircraft that was operating that route at the time. I attempted to clean this up once before by sorting the general info to the top, then having a section about the 1999 incident, but my edit was reverted as most articles about flight numbers only mention the last time it flew. In the case of QF1, the last time it flew is always within the last day or two! Am I the only one who thinks the article needs work? --Scott Davis Talk 14:34, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article still confused
Talk:Tuxtla Gutiérrez

message: ===Two articles in one?===
Does this information refer to the city or the municipality of Tuxtla Gutiérrez?  In the introduction it seems that the article is about the former, while the "Municipal" infobox would indicate that it is about the municipality - the City of Tuxtla Gutiérrez is the capital of the municipality of the same name, and takes up 40% of the area of said municipality.  Does this need to be two separate articles? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Parallel or Together (talk • contribs) 7 Sept 2005
:I guess no one wants to change this into two separate articles (one for city and one for municipality).  Either that or no one cares.  I am fine with it either way.  I also made some more edits (sorry to be confusing by making so many small ones, I just went section by section).  I made some changes that I hope makes the article easier to read, but which might lose the original meaning in some cases (I have pointed these out in the article itself as hidden text, such as aguacil --> governor and something in the section about climate that I now forget). I hope no one has a problem with the changes; feel free to find better ways of saying whatever I've said.  And I don't like the red links, but I didn't bother doing anything about them. -Parallel or Together? 06:42, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: The article in spanish has been updated notabilly. Who will traduce it? (Jan 9, 2006)

message: Does this information refer to the city or the municipality of Tuxtla Gutiérrez?  In the introduction it seems that the article is about the former, while the "Municipal" infobox would indicate that it is about the municipality - the City of Tuxtla Gutiérrez is the capital of the municipality of the same name, and takes up 40% of the area of said municipality.  Does this need to be two separate articles? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Parallel or Together (talk • contribs) 7 Sept 2005
:I guess no one wants to change this into two separate articles (one for city and one for municipality).  Either that or no one cares.  I am fine with it either way.  I also made some more edits (sorry to be confusing by making so many small ones, I just went section by section).  I made some changes that I hope makes the article easier to read, but which might lose the original meaning in some cases (I have pointed these out in the article itself as hidden text, such as aguacil --> governor and something in the section about climate that I now forget). I hope no one has a problem with the changes; feel free to find better ways of saying whatever I've said.  And I don't like the red links, but I didn't bother doing anything about them. -Parallel or Together? 06:42, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Two articles in one?

message: * Cuisine of Tuxtla Gutiérrez: 10% done, but it has a lot of food names i don't know  -- Doviende 17:28, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: linked articles needing work

message: I speak Spanish fluently, but I have trouble with Nahuatl words like "tuxtla". How do you pronounce it? --Revolución (talk) 00:03, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciation
Talk:List of Test cricket hat-tricks

message: Alok Kapali only took 6 test wickets.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.189.80.23 (talk) 13:59, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fewest test wickets 

message: Just for the record, I think Barlow's was the only hat-trick in the 1970 RotW "Tests" (I had mistakenly added that Australian Garth McKenzie took one in the fifth match, at The Oval; despite the scorecard -  - 1971 Wisden says that he didn't).
On South African rebel tours, there were (at least) two hat-tricks in the 1985 tour by Australian led by Kim Hughes, both taken in the third "Test" at Wanderers by South Africans, Garth Le Roux and Clive Rice.     The other tours were in 1982 (English team led by Graham Gooch), 1982 (Sri Lankan team led by Bandula Warnapura, Arosa Sri Lanka), 1982-83 and 1983-84 (two West Indian teams) and 1990 (English team led by Mike Gatting).  I'd be grateful if anyone could add further details of hat-tricks in the "Tests" on those tours. -- ALoan (Talk) 20:16, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: While RoTW teams were extremely strong, it is doubtful whether any of the rebel teams were representative of the real first XIs from their country or near Test class Tintin (talk) 04:44, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

text: That was a one-day match. Tintin 10:59, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Other "Test" hat-tricks

message: Shouldn't the Test number column contain the number of the Test so they can be compared against eachother, rather than the Test in the series which I don't see much use for. Tony2Times (talk) 12:57, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Test #

message: Aren't all hat-tricks notable, making this just a pile of (unref'd) trivia under another name? Lugnuts (talk) 17:46, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, no single Test hat-trick is more notable than another in my opinion. AssociateAffiliate (talk) 21:10, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

text: Yes. Not useful in this format. I'd suggest most could be abbreviated into a notes column at the far right of the table. Discretion would need to be used; taking one on your birthday is interesting but not necessary. The oldest/youngest, slightly more so. Mentioning 4 in 5 balls etc could stay. Info such as players to take more than one: two options, either give them a (1)/(2) after their name in column one, or just mention them in the lead. And add the references yes.—User:MDCollins (talk) 00:30, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section titled Notable Test hat-tricks 

message: Possibly by an Indian cricket 'fan', Broad's hat-trick v India 9#39 on the list) has been deleted incorrectly and potentially maliciously.
Broad's hat-trick (2011 against India) taking the wickets of Mahendra Singh Dhoni, Harbhajan Singh and Praveen Kumar, should be reinstated. Shrpa01 (talk) 11:04, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page has been edited to remove Stuart Broad's hat-trick v India
Talk:Major Dhan Singh Thapa

message: The article on Major Dhan Singh Thapa is copied as is fromt the copyrighted source . See Copyrights#Using_copyrighted_work_from_others Please *rewrite* the articles that you find. The current contents will need to be removed soon. Tintin 07:29, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Uh, oh. Looks like the *citation* is not under copyright. Sorry. Tintin 07:31, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: To  202.63.117.23

message: Hi, I removed the template as the template is only for the award pages and not the awardee pages. Also, none of the awarde pages sport this template. ---Gurubrahma 10:33, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  removal of template  

message: As Dhan Singh Thapa now has two pages, this page should be merged into the other one (there should be no titles in article names). This page can then become a redirect. Thanks, ::Supergolden:: 11:59, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Shvernik Commission

message: *Z. Serdyuk == ? Сердюк Зиновий Тимофеевич, С 1961 1-й зам. председатель Комитета партийного контроля при ЦК КПСС, 
*N. Mironov == ? Миронов Миронов Николай Романович Зав. отделом административных органов ЦК КПСС
mikka (t) 07:36, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing names
Talk:Singhbhum district

message: *A useful link: Singhbum on EB 1911. --Bhadani 07:58, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: with Jharkhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Jharkhand or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:54, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Jharkhand workgroup Addition
Talk:17th parallel north

message: 17th parallel north seems to be a perfectly adequate home for all of the information in Seventeenth parallel, which could be changed to a redirect page.  The pages for other parallels are of a similar format, e.g. 49th parallel north which holds a lot of information on the US / Canada border. Bazonka (talk) 16:31, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have now made the merge. Bazonka (talk) 20:34, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Health board (Ireland)

message: I would question the need for this article.  I have personally never come across the phrase being used in the Irish media, and a Google search only turns up wikipedia-sourced content, as well as something to do with some series of fantasy books.  Also, the health boards are no more.
Surely it would be better to have an article on the health board system, which could include this content and a note about the "Eleven Kingdoms" nickname - although I'd like to see some evidence that this nickname was widely used. --Ryano 08:41, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It was quite a common term by the opposition for some time and a google search is not always definitive in nature. If you want to rewrite in terms of the 1970 Health Act then by all means. Djegan 09:06, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  I may do that if time allows, although I'm not much of an expert on the area.  Perhaps the term "eleven kingdoms" predates my interest in politics, but I've searched the archives of Dáil debates and it doesn't appear to have been used in the house at least. --Ryano 09:41, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: I
Template talk:PIE

message: so far, a clone of :Template:IPA, with the possibility to add customization options. dab (ᛏ) 08:49, 7 September 2005 (UTC)

message: Shouldn't this template add the article to :Category:Articles containing Proto-Indo-European-language text‎ like ?
--Error (talk) 20:45, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category:
Talk:HD-MAC

message: todo: copy/move some details from the HDTV article.
I remember seeing 16:9 MAC-transmissions from the winter olympics in 1992. Where those HD-MAC or just wide screen D2-MAC?
I saw the demos in Paris. These were true HD-MAC, but could also be seen with D2-MAC receivers as the system was designed to be compatible. I have modified some details in the article based on the ETSI specification. Also,
i have insisted on front video projectors rather than retroprojectors, because this is the way it was set up at both
sites i visited in Paris (FNAC and Eiffel tower). I suppose it is possible that some other sites had rear projection TV sets, and those are mentioned for the world exposition in Seville in some of the links i have added, so i left it in the article, but fixed the internal link that only led to "television sets".
A "full HD" picture must be 30 ° wide in the field of vision. For HD-MAC that only transmitted 1440 pixels horizontally, this is down to 24 °. This still requires a big image, though, so i guess video projectors were used wherever possible in receiving sites.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Metazoaire (talk • contribs) 20:48, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Freddie Calthorpe

message: Is he on e of eth Gough-Calthorpe family? Andy Mabbett 09:12, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Going by the name, I'd guess yes. See also Henry Blofeld. Maybe you could write in and ask Blowers (although he won't be on TMS for the coming Test), jguk 12:01, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Gough-Calthorpe family
Talk:Administrative divisions of Bihar

message: I can't find much information about this district; it is not listed as a district of Bihar by India's national information centre  or from the Bihar state website . Most of the mentions of the district found on google are copies of this one, although one can find mentions of Naugachia District in articles in Indian newspapers. Anyone have any insight? Tom Radulovich 17:12, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Navgachia District

message: Dear fellow Wikipedians,
I have provided link for details regarding districts... So please remove the  <<template for citation required>>. Cheers ANUPAM DUTTA 15:03, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links/Citations
Talk:Steven Spielberg/Archive 1

message: elpincha 22:24, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree ... much of Spielberg's work transcends national borders to portray the human side of matters ... the "patriot" tag does not fit. CES 03:45, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: About: "He is noted for the patriotism of his work"

message: Steven spielberg biography might be merged with this one. There are a number of links that may also be useful as research material  --WCFrancis 29 June 2005 01:38 (UTC)
:The page as it appears right now. I put it on VfD and so far it has gotten only merge votes. At the close of VfD, I'll put a redirect on the article page. --WCFrancis 6 July 2005 21:01 (UTC)
::Redirect now in place  WCFrancis 21:39, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Misnamed article on Spielberg
Talk:Bilgiri Hills

message: I propose to redirect the present page to the more complete and comprehensive entry at BR Hills. I have chosen that name because that is the most common way it is said. I have added details from first-hand experience of my 2 year stay in the hills. 
Please give  me your comments?
Forgot to singsign..... Prashanthns 19:21, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Shivanasamudram

message: Since there has been no objection raised, I will merge.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by BostonMA (talk • contribs) 
:I support the merger with the caveat that Shivanasamudra be retained as the article and that Shivanasamudram be made into a redirect (Google test as of date places the former slightly ahead of the latter). --Gurubrahma 14:01, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I did make Shivanasamudra the article and Shivanasamudram the redirect.  However, the history says that Shivanasamudra was created 21 December 2005, while Shivanasamudram was created 11 November 2003 and had significantly more edits. --BostonMA 14:25, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge