Talk:Southeastern (train operating company, 2006–2021)

message: Does anyone have a nice, recent photograph of a Class 375 Electrostar? We’re still using one with Connex logos as the header image. David Arthur 19:56, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: See talk at Talk:South Eastern Trains as well Pickle 00:20, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

text: I've replaced the above image with :Image:NewCross-375913-01crop.jpg - a photograph of a Class 375 with Southeastern branding photographed two days ago at New Cross station. Thryduulf 23:47, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Header photo

message: Read about the new timetable today ( [] BBC News and [] Southeastern website) - the 508s are to be replaced with 466s on the Sheerness Branch and Medway valley lines, among some other extra services. don't know if we can spin this into the article or just amend it when the change does happen ? Pickle 07:45, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Future 

message: New logo added by User:Rvd2007
Logo currently appearing on the official web site
:Is there any proof they are using this new logo? I know that the font is called Rockwell. Unisouth 09:36, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, what is the source for the new logo? It still has not appeared on their web site. David Arthur 16:48, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have just put a comment and since removed it on the other southeastern trains page!  The logo 'rockwell' can be seen on their newsletter leaflet available at train stations.  I prefer the old logo and not the new one.  --Screen42 00:45, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I completely agree with your comment about the new logo, it looks old fashioned, but not in a good way like Southern's logo does James MSC 11:30, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo 

message: Someone decided that the Class 375 goes as three coaches per set, when they are infact very wrong. The majority of all 375 sets come as sets of 4, and sometimes three. You can see most services from London Victoria to Ramsgate & Dover Priory with eight coaches, and seven on the rare occasion, consisting of two fours, or one four and one three.
I've changed it to look more appropriate.
The 376 is OK at the moment, because when in service they either operate as five or 10 coach configurations.
Alteran Ancient 18:40, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Class 375 Electroliner 

message: There seems to be some disagreement about the nature of the IKF. Let me nail my colours to the mast. The Integrated Kent Franchise is an amalgamation of the old South Eastern Franchise and the CTRL Domestic Services. For the purposes of accuracy on the succession box, I believe it is fair to treat the CTRL-DS as a franchise itself that simply did not run any trains. Is this fair, or am I talking out of somewhere unpleasant? Hammersfan 31/10/07, 13.17 GMT  —Preceding comment was added at 13:17, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nature of Integrated Kent Franchise

message: It's troubling that this article manages to mention "CTRL-DS" several times without either explaining the term or linking to a page which might explain it. Can someone who knows this stuff please fix it? Thanks. 92.234.10.126 (talk) 22:10, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: ‘CTRL-DS’ just means domestic services on the Channel Tunnel Rail Link (i.e. High Speed 1). I’ve added a definition to the appropriate section of the article. David Arthur (talk) 22:31, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Brilliant, thank you very much. 92.234.10.126 (talk) 23:09, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  CTRL-DS 

message: I proposing this because looking at the London 2012 this service, the St Pancras to Ebbsfleet shuttle during the Olympic games, is referred to is the Javelin®. See  I was looking at the page a view to moving it, but I feel that the information could fit in a couple of paragraphs on this page. Edgepedia (talk) 19:38, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Javelin Merger Proposal 

message: Should the sboxs now be bule? As Southeastern's colours are now bule it makes no sence having them still yellow after 3 years of Southeastern, it's not South Eastern Trains any more! Likelife (talk) 12:30, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  sboxs (rail starts) 

message: Just decided to put a few hours into overhauling the current routes, guiltlessly taking the template from the Southern TOC Article and summarising all of Southeastern's routes onto it. It should be error-free, but I may have missed something. If you do spot anything, feel free to correct it. I am only familiar with the Victoria and Chatham-based routes, so someone may have to look over the Charing Cross and SEML-based routes. Thanks Alteran Ancient (talk) 03:03, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overhauled Routes List 

message: Not sure if appropriate to add to Southeastern's page a section about the redevelopment at London Bridge and what looks likely to be terrible disruption to Southeastern services, the subsequent withdrawal of some of Southeastern's services, and the company's decision not to communicate these effectively to the affected public and not to offer appropriate / acceptable alternatives. They are major changes, a significant number of people will be affected: while Southeastern is not the only TOC affected (hence my hesitation), it does seem to be the worst at communicating with it's customers, and looking at various coverage it also appears to be the only TOC that is withdrawing entire services for years or in some cases permanently without providing decent alternative options. Billse10 (talk) 17:14, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: There's a new timetable planned for this December, and there has been some (local) criticism about the public consultation about this. ASAIK, the changes are currently with the DfT for approval. Not too sure about the rest of your comments though, surely the services changes around London Bridge are to do with the Thameslink Programme over which SouthEastern has little control? Edgepedia (talk) 17:53, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

text: The (obsolete) southeastern consultation document, section 7, goes into detail about these changes. Edgepedia (talk) 18:02, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  London Bridge redevelopment 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Southeastern (train operating company). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.southeasternrailway.co.uk/index.php/press_releases/press_releases/view/77
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:19, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Southeastern (train operating company). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070810131241/http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/rail/passenger/franchises/ikf/integratedkentfranchisestake3338 to http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/rail/passenger/franchises/ikf/integratedkentfranchisestake3338
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090419152425/http://www.firstcapitalconnect.co.uk:80/content/doc/timetables/tttl_book_pdf_ontime_final_ver.pdf to http://www.firstcapitalconnect.co.uk/content/doc/timetables/tttl_book_pdf_ontime_final_ver.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:32, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Relatively new Wiki editor here, I apologize if my cleanup tag is in error but I feel the performance section of the article needs to be discussed. To me, it reads more like a criticism section and a few of the references seem editorial in nature.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.29.246.30 (talk) 02:27, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: All of the references are verifiable (WP:V) and are from reliable sources (WP:RS) quoting industry normal passenger surveys. How is that not NPOV? --10mmsocket (talk) 08:58, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

text: And *never* apologise for trying to clean up an article by challenging its content. Thank you. We need more people to do that. --10mmsocket (talk) 08:59, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV - "Performance" section 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved; the old franchise to Southeastern (train operating company 2006–2021); the new franchise here.  Sceptre (talk) 18:19, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 8 October 2021 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved.  – robertsky (talk) 12:50, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Southeastern (train operating company 2006–2021) →  – may fit in accordance with WP:CONCISE. There is no other company that operated within this timeframe. This has been done with TransPennine Express (2016-2023) so I see no reason why this could be made shorter. The same could even be done with Great Western Railway (train operating company) to Great Western Railway (2015) or 1996. JuniperChill (talk) 10:09, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Trains has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 13:39, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject London Transport has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 13:39, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Kent has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 13:39, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 16 February 2024 

message: Because it feels more natural to say it that way, just like with Microsoft Flight Simulator (2020 video game)? and also because the years should go before the noun. Note that this is not an official RM. 
(forgot to say that Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK Railways has been notified by me 18:31 25 april 2024 UTC)
JuniperChill (talk) 19:24, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shouldn't this be titled [[Southeastern (2006–2021 train operating company)]]...