lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Department of Natural Resources (disambiguation)

message: Though this seems more like a disambiguation page, this is still an article. Perhaps a little information on what the "general" definitions of what the DNR is like would be good. Then in the body, the collection of links. Zchris87v 07:52, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: General article

message: Hello, I would like to propose to merge the US portions of this article with Department of Environmental Protection and Department of Environmental Management, creating a new List of environmental agencies in the United States. A sample may be seen at my sandbox page. Any comments or suggestions? Thanks, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 14:57, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Retract: I've gone ahead and created the new article, List of environmental agencies in the United States, incorporating material from this and several other stub/ disambiguation pages. The remaining question is whether there is a continuing use for this and those other pages. Thanks, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 21:22, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed partial article merge
Talk:War Powers Act

message: Something is not right here.  There is already a page called Trading with the Enemy Act.  This page, called "War Powers Act", is also about the Trading with the Enemy Act.  Some past versions of this page claimed the two are the same, but I can find no external source to back that up.  The current version doesn't even claim the TWEA and WPA are the same.  A quick search of the US Code shows there was a "Second War Powers Act (of 1942)" and that the 1973 War Powers Resolution indeed also called itself a "War Powers Act".  So shouldn't this page be about the two or three laws actually called the War Powers Act, and not the TWEA?
The only War Powers Act that I am familiar with was in 1973, which required the president to report to Congress within forty eight hours after sending troops to a foreign conflict or increasing the amount of troops in a foreign country.
I am looking at my history book and it says, "War Powers Act of 1941" Gave the U.S. president power to reoganize the federal government and create new agencies; to establish programs censoring news, information, adn abridging civil liberties; to seize foreign-owned property; and award government contracts without bidding"...uhm... I think whoever posted the previous comment is right and this section needs a new name and the actual info for the War Powers Act should be inputed.
Since the 1973 Act of Congress referred to as "The War Powers" Act has nothing to do with "Trading wth the Enemy Act" It is pretty obvous the TWEA stuff if it exists elsewhere can safely be deleted from this section.Awotter 21:25, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's just completely baffling, in my opionion.  The content of this page should probably be moved to TWEA, and this page redirect to disambig page with the WPA of 1941 and the WP Resolution of 1973 mkehrt 22:47, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:B.C. Bill

message: I added B.C._Bill_Cover_Art.jpg as the primary means of visual identification of the game referenced within the article, and did so under the fair use rationale that it is minimal usage of non-free content, in low-resolution format, used in a limited way in a single article.  
Sjc196 (talk) 12:24, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:B.C._Bill_Cover_Art.jpg
Talk:Wigner effect

message: I just rewrote the article. My primary source was sections 7.11-7.13 in a book called "Nuclear Reactor Engineering" By Samuel Glasstone and Alexander Sesonske, Copyright 1963. I'm a bit unfamiliar with citing books on wikipedia so please feel free to help me. Vicarious 23:04, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Source

message: I heard it called "Wigner's disease", which I thought was a nicer name. I googled and Wigner effect is preferred now.Likebox (talk) 20:51, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Wigner's Disease 

message: Can someone relate this to the Wigner effect?Lbertolotti (talk) 10:51, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Random Matrices and principal components
Talk:PolyHeme

message: The company developing this product has gone out f business.  See the wiki page for http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northfield_Laboratories   — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cogorno (talk • contribs) 19:54, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: note

message: This article seriously needs to include the negative side of it and the controversy. --Michael.Niemann 23:07, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: From what I've read, the so called "controversy" is only related to the non-informed consent issue that was raised by Senator Grassley.  Even then, it only has to with the FDA, since the FDA allowed Northfield to start and proceed with the current trial, Northfield follows the law here and did nothing wrong.  What controversy are you suggesting, the ANH trial?  Have you read the external links at the bottom?  Before the phase III trial started, the FDA and many participating trauma centers and the Institutional Review Board (IRB) have reviewed the datas from that trial and allowed the p.III trial to proceed, ie. they must have concluded that the results of the ANH trial was inconclusive.  Besides, in the current trial, if you had read, there have been 4 different occasions during this phase III trial where the Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC), who has an unblinded look at the trial progress for any safety problems or any anomolies, still recommended the trial to proceed.  I suggest we should remove the neutrality tag. Disclamer:  I own NFLD stock and am an advocate of Polyheme, I have read much about the product and the company itself. --Sir Vicious 20:08, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: This

message: It is my feeling that the neutrality tag should be removed for now, purely because the disputing user has not replied, and therefore there isn't really a dispute. If he were ever to return, it would seem appropriate to me to add the template again, and reopen this debate. However, he isn't here, so it is no longer disputed. Additionally, perhaps when the article is rewritten per below, adding all the information you stated above might be sensible, as it is all events in relation to this product. --Xyrael T 11:37, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:3O|Third opinion]]

message: Umm, this article is directly copied from , the first result of a Google on "PolyHeme", and the manufacturer of the product. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Leapfrog314 (talk • contribs) .
:True, user "2005-12-03 02:02:48 69.137.90.8" lifted most of the content from their site.  Anyone up for a re-write or re-wording? Sir Vicious 19:50, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I plan to rewrite this. —Xyrael / 17:04, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And I've done so. Hope it's okay. —Xyrael / 18:03, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Gracias, gracias :). Sir Vicious 03:20, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio?
Talk:Kya Kehna

message: * NDTV --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 02:21, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Articles
Talk:The Muckrakers

message: Yes it should be.
Merged that is.
:Disagree It is ridiculous to propose merging a disambig with one article it links to. ReverendG 02:25, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yes. 

message: This is THE BEST METAL BAND EVER! My favorite song by them is "Black" from their ep "The Album's Off". Muckrakerfan (talk) 05:30, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Muckrakers
Talk:War and Remembrance

message: *I'm Deleting the "Plot Introduction" section because its full of original research and unsourced statements.  It did contain a good quote by the author (also unsourced).  If it's a real quote and anyone can find the source it should be put back in.--Gyrcompass 01:25, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

message: Yes - I came to view the miniseries and research how much the network LOST...And i'm reading through names that might as well be "Cyclops" cause I didn't read the book...my research is strictly finance.  Please Split.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.4.102.127 (talk) 07:07, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree - are you able to do the work. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page) 14:16, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

text: I agree too, though I'm fairly new to editing and am not excited about trying to do it.  They need to be merged pretty badly though, the book and miniseries are two completely different things and would do much better as separate articles.--Gyrcompass 01:55, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Split article?
Talk:The Winds of War

message: I suggest moving info about the miniseries to a new, separate article. --Danielos2 23:18, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree here also, can you do it. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page) 14:18, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

text: See https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/miniseries: all one word and no hyphen. Toddcs (talk) 00:27, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

message: Is it really necessary to have two separate "See also" entries to Wouk's War and Remembrance, one to the book and the other to the miniseries? The former should suffice. A reader who follows that link to the article about the book will be naturally directed from there to the miniseries as well. Toddcs (talk) 00:21, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  See also
Talk:Pitcher's mound

message: Merged into baseball field Judgesurreal777 23:23, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merged

message: It looks like this page was de-merged, and a large portion of baseball field was copied and pasted here. I don't suppose it's really necessary unless this page is going to be expanded significantly beyond what's on the baseball field page... Chubbles 00:26, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: De-Merged?

message: I do not think that the articles should be merged because I think we should have a article on each part of the baseball game! Afterall baseball is one of the most popular sports! Why not have an Article? I mean if we have articles on swearwords why can't we have a simple article on pitchers mound —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.229.236.252 (talk • contribs)  00:26, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The problem is, this article contributes nothing. It's completely pasted out from the baseball diamond article. If the pitcher's mound is to have its own article, it needs to have information beyond what's on the baseball diamond page. Chubbles 23:28, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The point of the merge was to consolidate the content and make one better article. If baseball field gets to Good Article status and there is so much sourced information, then it should be made into its own article. Otherwise, why should we have a stubby article? Judgesurreal777 00:59, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Unless there are further objections, I'd like to restore Judge's redirect. Chubbles 01:32, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: It SHould not be merged
Talk:Masters of the Universe (film)

message: Cheers. --CaptainNtheGameMaster (talk) 10:36, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Talk page archived
Talk:Gribbly's Day Out

message: Does anyone have any info about the Acorn Archimedes remake? --Trevj (talk) 11:30, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! I guess that from the year, it ought to be possible to track down a review or something. -- Trevj (talk · contribs) 07:03, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  -- Trevj (talk · contribs) 09:57, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legacy
Talk:Assumption College School

message: Anyone besides myself know anytihng about ACS?--AeomMai 04:51, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I do. i graduated from this hell on earth. i'd be glad to tell you of the various illegalities that go on within those walls, if you want.  RingtailedFox • Talk • Stalk 04:55, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  ACS 

message: there are many schools in Thailand using the name "Assumption" , 
for example . -- 61.19.241.43 10:56, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assumption College Schools in Thailand 
Talk:Félix Malloum

message: This article does not state his date of birth, only the year. The French article states 10 September, the German article states 13 September. Correct & improve (talk) 16:19, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Software Star

message: This game was also available for the Amstrad CPC series of home computers (464, 664 and 6128).--Peter Knutsen 10:47, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Also an Amstrad game
Talk:François Tombalbaye

message: IMO, this article and the article "The Tombalbaye Regime" should be merged. Thoughts? Josh (talk) 20:43, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Josh, the one you pose is a good question, I've long been thinking about it. The only problem is that the era of Chadian history 1960-75 and his biography don't completely coincide (as wouldn't a biog of Bush and the 8 year of American history during his presidency), even if there is a considerable overlapping due to the personalism of his rule.--Aldux (talk) 15:16, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I believe that pre-independence period of his bio should be considerably expanded and the text split into chapters. There should be many interesting details of his political struggles during ascent to PPT presidency and eleminating his competitors afterwards. After such an expansion I believe no one would want to merge these articles. Verdi1 (talk) 21:14, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  This is a good point, even because, to tell the truth, I ordered Sunday Bernard Lanne's Histoire Politique du Tchad, 1945-1958, which should treat in detail the beginning of his political career.--Aldux (talk) 21:23, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

text: It's a question I've posed myself, but I ended to discard it on the ground that most scholarship in the tiny field of Chadian studies by far prefers "François", and so as the most commonly used name, even after his death, I've kept it there.--Aldux (talk) 22:42, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed
Talk:Abéché

message: Ya, like, dey got lions, tigers, crocodiles and snakes running on the streets. :-) RocketMaster (talk) 17:56, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Running on the streets? kidding me!!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.147.156.182 (talk) 09:04, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No tigers in Chad. None!--DThomsen8 (talk) 00:53, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  The most dangerous place on Earth? Yeah, right!
Talk:Precision Club

message: The reason why Precision bids generally do so well is because few people are equipped to deal with the system.  In most American clubs the system users are required to provide a suggested defense against the system, which they usually just say: "Double for majors and No trump for minors."  Needless to say this is hardly the most effective defense against the system.
:Please sign your articles with four tildes for us to know who you are. Mario Fantoni 05:24, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  I disagree. 

message: I my experience Precision is successful at club level and lower due to two main reasons.
Firstly, limited understanding by Beginner to Advanced level opposition, and a degree of intimidation as such opposition assume that if the players have taken the trouble to learn such a complicated system then they must be quite good.
Secondly, the fact that the first round of bids are limit bids establishes a maximum level that the bidding should go to.  This means that the partnership rarely gets into trouble due to having overbid.  Admittedly the partnership is also less likely to find game contracts based on distribution. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 198.54.202.250 (talk) 18:42, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  In addition 

message: One reason why Precision is not very popular in America is because some clubs still require players using Precision to use the "Alert" before some very known variations like the "Gambling 3NT" (used to show 24-27HCP) and 1C - 1D not meaning 4-4-4-1 (Impossible Negative). "Alerts" make the bidding clumsy so nobody likes them. Mario Fantoni 05:23, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  A reason for impopularity 

message: I think it's pretty clear that the article has some serious NPOV problems.  Describing Precision as more precise than other methods or using phrases like "Experience has shown..." are not appropriate.  Put up some quotes of authorities saying how wonderful Precision is.  I've already put up some quotes from authorities saying it sucks; and let's leave it at that.200.121.172.211 (talk) 22:58, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Have to agree with this. There should be sections for "advantages" and "disadvantages" or similar. Precision certainly has its critics; combining a strong club with 5 card majors means the 1D bid has to do a lot of work. MaxBrowne (talk) 03:46, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV
Talk:Selle Français

message: 1. WBFSH Interstallion survey  Good source of information on goals and procedures.
2. "The Opening of the Selle Francais Studbook"  article by Bernard Le Courtois.
3. NASFA website  please regard "About the Selle Francais" with caution.
4. French Sport Horse Breeders Society ANSF website  Good source.
5. National Stud's information card on the Selle Francais 
6. 2007 WBFSH Jumping rankings  #2 thanks to Ideo du Thot (Arioso du Theillet), Ionesco de Brekka (Dollar du Murier), Ilostra Dark (Palestro II/Ecolit), Itot du Chateau (Le Tot de Semilly), Ideal de la Loge (Dollar du Murier), First de Launay (Laudanum)
7. 2007 WBFSH Dressage rankings  #16 thanks to Diabolo St Maurice (Plein d'Espoir IV), Galant du Serein (Apache d'Adriers)
8. 2007 WBFSH Eventing rankings  #2 thanks to Galan de Sauvagere (Joly Jumper), Espoir de la Mare (What A Joy), Jolly Hope de Treille (Sioux de Baugy), If You Want II (Major de la Cour), Lord de Ligniere (Hand in Glove), Literal (Queribus).
Countercanter (talk) 00:42, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links for the ambitious 

message: No problem it seems. I'm not the main author for the fr-version, article have been mainly writtn by Eponimm. --Tsaag Valren (talk) 12:36, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fast review
Talk:Brompheniramine

message: Look on any drugstore chain website, and you will see Brompheniramine containing drugs (all marketed as cold remedies I could could find) are READILY available. Dimetapp is one heavily marketed brand, still containing this as an active ingredient.  
This article says "It is rarely available over the counter" notice "rarely". Was this a typo or did someone try to mislead on purpose? At any rate, I am changing it. Retran (talk) 06:27, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Availability
Talk:Affinity chromatography

message: I think a section on Lectin affinity chromatography would be good somewhere here.  However, I don't know enough about it and I don't have time today.  I have removed a brief mention of Lectin Affinity from the IMAC section.  --Fatsug 00:58, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lectin Affinity? 

message: Affinity chromatography seems to be the same thing, except re-invented by biochemists instead. 129.97.246.125 (talk) 00:06, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ligand exchange? 

message: I have just shortened and clarified the lead section and added a reference to Bio-Rad's page on affinity chromatography (they are a major player in this field).  With all due respect to the previous authors, this page is a train wreck and needs major revision to improve clarity and simplicity.  I am going to make edits to this page over the coming weeks and will update this talk page as I do so.  WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 00:48, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problems with clarity 

message: I aim to create a new article about this what do you think?
Dye-ligand affinity chromatography is one of the Affinity chromatography techniques used for protein purification of a complex mixture. Like general chromatography, but using dyes to apply on a support matrix of a column as the stationary phase that will allow a range of proteins with similar active sites to bind to, refers to as pseudo-affinity.  Synthetic dyes are used to mimic substrates binding to the active sites of proteins which can be further enhanced to target more specific proteins. Follow with washing, the process of removing other non-target molecules, then eluting out target proteins. The column can be reused many times due to the stability of immobilized dyes. It can carry out in a conventional way by using a column or in high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).
The dyes are immobilized on the column matrix effectively, since usually the dyes link to a monochlorotriazine or dichlorotriazine ring (triazine dye). This type of dyes works well especially on a support matrix with hydroxyl group such as cross-linked agarose. The dyes used in this type of chromatography are inexpensive and generally available as they are from textile industries called reactive dye. It contains chromophores that are often attached to a triazine ring. 
; Discovery
The serendipity discovery of dye-ligand ability is from a blue dye called blue dextran. The blue dye is used as a void volume marker for a gel filtration column. It shown that the dye has a property to bind to some certain proteins like pyruvate kinase and elute out with the void volume. Later, it was found that "cibacron blue FG-3A", reactive dye link to dextran, is respondsible for the interaction with the proteins.
; References 
— Preceding unsigned comment added by U6181299 (talk • contribs) 06:53, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dye-ligand affinity chromatography 

message: I found an incomplete citation for the affinity chromatography. I will add the page.Pinguin destept (talk) 19:21, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing page in a citation