Talk:Herbal cigarette

message: The warning from Health Canada states that they don't recommend herbal cigarettes as a long term alternative to tobacco use due to the dangers of inhaling smoke of any kind, but it doesn't state what those dangers are. Therefore, I removed the part of the paragraph that states that users of herbal cigarettes still risk lung cancer and heart disease, as the supplied link does not support that statement. 99.192.7.90 (talk) 12:14, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: While herbal cigarettes may not include tobacco and thus nicotine, the burning process however still produces tar and possibly other substances, which are inhaled and which thus represent a considerable health risk. lmaxmai (talk) 19:06, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

text: Why was it removed, it does not seem to be present anymore. lmaxmai (talk) 19:06, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Health Concerns

message: The claim that the benefits of smoking herbal cigarettes may outweigh the harms really need something to back them up.  The specific claim for mullein (even with the word "may") seems particularly unfounded.  I did a quick search but found nothing to really support this.  I put a "citation needed" tag there for now, in case someone else knows what the support for this claim is.  Skalchemist (talk) 18:10, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Health Benefits

message: Why is there no mention of actors smoking herbal cigarettes in motion pictures with scripts calling for "smoking scenes"?  It was my understanding that actors are prohibited by law from smoking tobacco in their workplaces, and thus any cigarettes seen being smoked on the Silver Screen are actually herbals.  Is this correct?  -Grammaticus Repairo (talk) 23:21, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Usage in Film Industry

message: There's no indication in the article as to which country the brands originate from. Clarification would be nice. 94.192.52.244 (talk) 19:36, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Brands

message: There was a sentence claiming that filtered herbal cigarettes were invented in 1990, and referenced BBC article. It looks like the sentence was dropped in after the first lines describing what herbal cigarettes are which is referenced in the BBC article. 20s of Googling finds an article from 1976 talking about herbal cigarettes, although it is not clear that they have filters http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=a_BVAAAAIBAJ&sjid=R-EDAAAAIBAJ&dq=herbal%20cigarettes&pg=3715%2C749677 I doubt that adding a filter to a herbal cigarette in 1990 would qualify as 'novel' or 'inventive'. If you wish to revert the edit, please provide a source. 60.240.207.146 (talk) 14:53, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious claim of a 1990s invention removed 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Herbal cigarette. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120102091847/http://tobaccodocuments.org:80/bw/1178391.html to http://tobaccodocuments.org/bw/1178391.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:15, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Herbal cigarette. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20111230051651/http://www.honeyrose.co.uk:80/prod.html to http://www.honeyrose.co.uk/prod.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:27, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Herbal cigarette. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120111132116/http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/breakingnews/metro/view/20080119-113485/Herbal-cigarette-may-help-smokers-quit to http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/breakingnews/metro/view/20080119-113485/Herbal-cigarette-may-help-smokers-quit
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:42, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: "Many prop masters use and trust Honeyrose Herbal Cigarettes as their #1 choice for use in creative movie smoking scenes that involve actors  and crew members" reads as an advertisement and should be removed. 37.160.68.54 (talk) 14:03, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality 

message: Many prop masters use and trust Honeyrose Herbal Cigarettes as their #1 choice for use in creative movie smoking scenes that involve actors   and crew members. Herbal cigarettes can carry carcinogens. Khkronen (talk) 19:26, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed Cigarette Ad for Honeyrose 

message: The user "HerbalCigarettesQuitSmoking" has undone the previous edit by user Khkronen and reinstated their unequivocal brand advertisement in the article's opening paragraph. I'm no Wikipedia expert, but I don't believe putting citations to the company's own website makes it any less of an advertisement. Can someone who knows how to handle this sort of thing please handle it. Ibexe31 (talk) 08:05, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Reverted the edit and blocked the user for blatant promotion. RickinBaltimore (talk) 17:20, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cigarette Ad in the article