lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Category talk:Latter Day Saint missionaries

message: Hey!  There is already a Category:Mormon missionaries category.  This category is a duplicate.  Any entries in this category should be moved to that one and this one deleted.  It is much more mature and populated. — Frecklefσσt | Talk 13:24, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope. Read the descriptions. "Mormon missionaries" is a subcategory of this one and is specifically for LDS Church missionaries. A subcategory of it is also :Category:Community of Christ missionaries. This category is for individuals who don't fit nicely into either—i.e., they were Latter Day Saint missionaries prior to the 1844 succession crisis and can't rightly be classified as Community of Christ or LDS Church missionaries. Snocrates 04:41, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Duplicate category

message: One thing I like in :Category:Mormon missionaries is when I can specify :Category:Mormon missionaries in Canada or :Category:Mormon missionaries in the United States.  Since this is a parent above all that, should it have its own geographic subcategories, such as :Category:Latter Day Saint missionaries in the United States? Rich jj (talk) 23:30, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geographic subcategories 

message: I just discovered this category since I had assumed all Latter Day Saint movement missionaries were included in :Category:Mormon missionaries.  Didn't pre-1844 church members accept the informal moniker "Mormons"?  Are they more distanced from the term "Mormon" than the LDS Church?  Some people in other Latter Day Saint denominations are referred to as Mormon, such as R.C. Evans, formerly RLDS, in the title of his Forty Years In the Mormon Church: Why I Left It.
Anyway, I think the problem is just that I never thought the word "Mormon" in :Category:Mormon missionaries referred to only The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.  Should it be called :Category:Missionaries of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints?  Maybe that's too wordy for a category, but it's already used for :Category:Bishops of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, and that is the most specific name for the church.  What should be done?  Does anybody else really care?  Rich jj (talk) 23:46, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Just to add to the mix, note that Mormon missionary redirects to Missionary (LDS Church), which is specific to The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. I've thought about this before, and I agree that the names are not ideal and the distinction is a little bit strained, but in light of the many subcategories of , I'm not sure that :Category:Missionaries of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints could work across all of these. But I'm also not sure what would be better. I'm not much help here. Good Ol’factory (talk) 10:36, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ambiguous category names
Talk:Post-chemotherapy cognitive impairment

message: i have just gotten used to footnoted references. That way each idea or factum is tied to a cite below. After I added my input, I noticed that wasn't the scheme being followed.  Is the goal to ultimately use footnoted refs? If not, then I"ll conform my addition.Godspeed John Glenn! Will 13:30, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: references

message: I've removed the following links from the main page - they can be used as references, but aren't good choices for external links and should be linked as in-line citations for the sources.  I'll try to integrate later today. WLU (talk) 12:06, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved possible sources 

message: * 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
Stored to add.  WLU (talk) 20:04, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pubmed sources 

message: — Assignment last updated by Dandelions-love-to-fly (talk) 19:23, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello everyone, I am adding to this talk page to explain the edits I am adding for my Wiki Education assignment. I am adding a section on cancer related cognitive impairment to the supportive care (formerly psychological aspects) section of this article as it is a common complaint for breast cancer patients. I think it would be very beneficial to have this on the Wikipedia page as it is often an unexpected and distressing experience. I was trained on how to add to a medical article such as this, and I hope you find my content to be helpful and in line with the existing content in the article. Thank you and it is nice to work with you all of this! 22ilovecats22 (talk) 05:23, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: The Impact of Cancer
Talk:The Revolt

message: The first sentence of this article says "The Revolt ... is a book about the militant Zionist organization Irgun..." It is customary to give a book's publication date, yet only the date of the book's first English translation is provided. Also, one guesses the book was written in Hebrew; it would be nice for the article to confirm this guess. Page Notes (talk) 02:25, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  When was The Revolt first published? 

message: By the first half of the 19th century , the east india company had brought major portions of India under its control.One hundred years after the Battle of Plassey, anger against the unjust and oppressive British Government took the form of a revolt that shook the very foundations of British rule in India.While British historians called it sepoy mutiny , Indian historians named it The Revolt of 1857. 223.230.131.213 (talk) 08:56, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The revolt of 1857
Talk:Marshall Eriksen

message: How about his fascination with Nessie and the fact that futur bald Marshall ends up catching Nessie as seen in the newspaper headline in "We're not from here"'s future scene—Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.133.139.5 (talk) 13:40, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nessie

message: Does anybody know how long he studied the law school and how old he was when he finished? For how many years does a person in  U. S. study a law school?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.151.83.161 (talk) 16:44, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Law School 

message: There appears to be an edit war going on as to whether he went to "Wesleyan University" or "Ohio Wesleyan University."  Yes, these really are two different universities, and Ohio Wesleyan is correct - the name of the school is clearly visible on a diploma in his office in "Not a Father's Day."  I can provide a screenshot if necessary.  To the person who keeps editing the article to say Wesleyan instead of Ohio Wesleyan, what is your reason for doing so??  Meadowlark527 (talk) 01:44, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  alma mater 

message: Season 4 ep 10 reveals that he is an extremly good fighter. He beats an experienced fighter (who was able to beat three guys alone before) without a scratch. He hates fighting though.
83.216.242.110 (talk) 02:39, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  pacifistic street fighter 

message: Forgive me if I'm not familiar with standard practice, but is there a reason the image is of the actor at a promotional event, especially since he has a look there Marshall never had during the show? Wouldn't it make more sense to use a promotional still or a screenshot of Marshall rather than a random picture of the actor?
Larkmarn (talk) 15:39, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture isn't of Marshall Eriksen
Talk:2666

message: Was the book published in 2004? The earliest copy I can find is 2006? Fothergill Volkensniff IV (talk) 15:42, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  2004 or 2006? 

message: re: this section removed from the article to here:
:The book was published posthumously in Spanish in 2004 to tremendous acclaim, after what appears to have been a bit of dithering over Bolaño’s final intentions — a small result of which is that its English translation (by Natasha Wimmer, the indefatigable translator of “The Savage Detectives”) has been bracketed by two faintly defensive statements justifying the book’s present form.
There is no problem discussing this aspect, but it needs to be sourced and re-worded. As is, it reads like original research. I've read the intro and ending and it wasn't "faintly defensive", in fact it is very direct what the situation is and why they did what they did - no artificial scandal needed. He wanted to 5 volumes to increase sales over a longer period of time to provide support for his wife and family, while his executors felt the novel was more aesthetic as a whole.  As for there being a "a bit of dithering", that needs to be sourced and clarified exactly what "dithering" means - who said what where when and why, otherwise this just reads like a gossip column. 71.191.40.106 (talk) 01:47, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 1 vs 5 volume author intentions

message: The section here that is described as a synopsis is nothing of the sort. It needs relabeling, but it would be cavalier for me to do this, I think. Macphysto (talk) 10:06, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Focused on the unsolved and still ongoing serial murders of Ciudad Juárez
Focused? The novel isn't focused on anything. Yet, how does one say it? Fothergill Volkensniff IV (talk) 01:39, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Synopsis

message: Isn't there a mention of the year 2666 in The Savage Detectives? Belano _is_ the narrator of 2666 acording to Bolaño's notes on the book. --Crio de la Paz (talk) 22:45, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Title
Talk:Behind the News

message: During what time period was the show simulcast on the Seven Network (or HSV7, the article isn't clear)? matturn 14:44, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not aware of any simulcasting to commercial stations sorry - do you have a rough time you remember this happening, ie 80's? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danielmee (talk • contribs) 03:55, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Simulcast

message: Hello, I work at Behind the News and we would like to help improve the article about us. Our 50th anniversary is coming up next year and we have done a lot of research which we would like to see reflected in the wikipedia article. I don't mind doing it all but I believe Wikipedia prefers if someone else verifies or validates the information. We plan on creating a Googledoc which will contain all the information for review - is this an ok approach? We can also engage other organisations like NLA or Trove if needed too? I will attempt to contact the WikiProject Australia page too as suggested above. Daniel Mee 03:55, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Australian television#Updating the Behind the News article. Kb.au (talk) 07:19, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: 50th anniversary research
Talk:Ed Beard

message: Just gonna drop this bookmark here against the time when I or somebody else can chase down proper sources and add it to the article (or maybe earn Josephine her own article, who knows?): http://www.geneamusings.com/2016/06/is-this-best-census-record-ever.html - 73.215.157.183 (talk) 12:47, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Josephine DeMerritt
Talk:Enrique Villanueva

message: The coordinates need the following fixes:
* Write here
N 9.27639, E 123.6472
195.229.241.177 (talk) 11:32, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. Deor (talk) 12:19, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error 
Talk:List of cities and municipalities in the Philippines

message: Statistcs of each municipality?121.1.37.149 (talk) 05:47, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Replaced list with table. Sanglahi86 (talk) 20:26, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article currently has 445,538 bytes  of wiki-markup, which makes it far too big. What's the best way to split it? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:15, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  As main contributor to the large table back then, I agree with P199 that the 2010 population and per annum growth rate columns be removed. I removed such columns. Although I personally think the barangay count column should be preserved. Instead, I would suggest that the PSGC column be also removed as it is merely an identifier used by the Philippine Statistics Authority and not useful for comparative purposes. Besides, PSGC changes might not be updated like the current version of the table still having both Negros Occidental and Negros Oriental under the now defunct Negros Island Region (180000000). –Sanglahi86 (talk) 09:57, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I agree that the PSGC code is also not useful here. Regards, -- P 1 9 9  ✉ 14:12, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page size 

message: I see that Bali province's cities are missing from the list. According to Denpasar, it is capital of Bali, is classified as "City of Denpasar" and has population of about 900,000. So it would rank 6th on the list. Any good reason for not having it on the list? I could not think of any. 86.115.119.234 (talk) 13:58, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Uhh, because this is a list of cities and municipalities in the Philippines? —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 14:02, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bali (and maybe others too)?
Talk:Flora of Colombia

message: Is this not excessive at all? I mean, it is very long, and overwhelming.... Aero 04:06, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, as I suggested above. Richard001 06:18, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gallery 
Talk:Slovenian Parliament

message: This article should be deleted, as the institution simply doesn't exist, neither legally nor functionally. There is only the National Assembly and the National Council, but they are separate and independent bodies. They only share the same building, which is called the Parliament. edolen1 14:28, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This is correct, although it is not unusual for a bicameral legislature to not be institutionalized as such (compare, e. g., the parliament of Austria). Still, I would propose to insert an explanatory note, so as to address this issue. --Alib (talk) 14:23, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The article should cover the history since the convention of the first Slovenian parliament in 1945. Constitutions changed a lot since then. --Eleassar my talk 17:18, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: The Slovenian Parliament as an institution doesn't exist

message: I removed the statement by France Bučar, as it doesn't relate strongly to the topic, as it is more about politics in general than just the parliament. Also, I imagine similar opinions can be found about the politics of most democratic states. User332572385 (talk) 18:23, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed France Bučar statement
Talk:Man: A Course of Study

message: I have no idea why this should be proposed for deletion. I only created this stub in response to an entry in the requested articles section under 'education' in wikipedia. I assumed that the organisation wanted this article/stub. If it doesn't, then someone should adjudicate the situation. Otherwise, I was wasting my time. --Train guard 14:42, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm suspicious of the prod. To a Brit it all sounds pretty normal, in fact my daughter who goes to one of the top private schools here is explicitly taught on a spiral curriculum and many of the ideas in this article are regarded as mainstream. Notability can sometimes be a very parochial concept. andy 18:31, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Deletion
Talk:Ulleskelf

message: Survey of English Placenames (online) thinks the "kelf" element in the name makes more sense if it is understood as "skelf" as in other similar names (e.g.Raskelf). which suggests the current word "shelf" i.e a piece of flat land above water - which certainly is a feature of its site - which belonged to a Scandinavian named Ulf.  Presumably a calf could still have grazed there but would not have been a permanent featureDelahays (talk) 19:36, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Oxford Dictionary of British Place Names by A.D.Mills says "shelf or ledge of a man named Ulfr" (and says, in its glossary, that "skelf" is "shelf of level ground"), which is very like the source you found. The calf thing was added in this edit, the edit summary of which is "Kelf does not translate from any of the modern scandinavian languages so I tried Icelandic using google translate". That's etymological nonsense, and utter original research. I'll change it to what Mills says; if you can add a ref to the source you found, as corroboration, that would be valuable addition. Good catch in noticing this. -- Finlay McWalter··–·Talk 21:31, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Etymology

message: We really should have a proper reliable source for the claim that A Touch of Frost was filmed here. The IMDb page makes that claim also, but Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources#IMDb notes that IMDb is generally not considered to be a reliable source. If someone as access to a copy of the episode, and the production credits in the episode support this, that should be acceptable per WP:PSTS (it's a plain fact requiring no analysis, and it's not contentious). -- Finlay McWalter··–·Talk 00:56, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''A Touch of Frost''
Talk:Disodium octaborate

message: Roach Prufe is boric acid, not DOT. It should not be listed as one of the products containing DOT. http://www.copperbrite.com/MSDSRoachPrufe.pdf  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.33.53.115 (talk) 01:17, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disodium octaborate tetrahydrate 

message: 5/22/2013- corrected broken link to Allergy_DOT_Study.pdf  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.254.20.30 (talk) 00:01, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  references 

message: Propose a section for the use as a fire retardant.--Wikipietime (talk) 14:41, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fire Retardant Use
Talk:List of World War II weapons of Italy

message: I propose to merge this page with the "Italian Army equipment in World War II" because topics are largely duplicate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trurle (talk) 16.09, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
:Agreed, as far as I can see there is nothing listed in the Italian Army equipment in World War II article that is not a weapon. DerbyCountyinNZ  (Talk Contribs) 02:27, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:Propiconazole

message: Spoke to a licensed, certified arborist today and she said that Propiconazole is the only treatment scientifically proven (thus far) to effectively prevent and treat oak wilt.  This information should be included.Tym Whittier (talk) 21:54, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Tym - Don't expect someone else to do your editing.  You cannot use what someone told you.  If you think something should be added, objective truth and accuracy is not the standard.  You need to be able to cite a reliable reference to support any assertion for this encyclopedia.  The standard is verifiability.  See WP:CITE. Eschoryii (talk) 07:46, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Only Treatment for Oak Wilt
Talk:Apple mosaic virus

message: The link to reference #2 on the reference list does not work. The page is not found. --EthosNap (talk) 01:49, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference #2
Talk:Pulsating theory

message: I would like to move this page to Pulsating universe since the current title is not really accurate.  It's not a theory in the scientific sense, so much as a natural consequence of existing theories (the Big Bang and General relativity).  I've never seen/heard it referred to as the Pulsating theory in a scientific context. Cosmo0 15:17, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I've taken a look at the article history and there doesn't seem to be much active interest in the article, so I'm just going to go ahead and do it.  If you object, write on my talk page. Cosmo0 15:23, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Move to Pulsating universe
Talk:Asparagus virus 1

message: I think that someone should edit this part of the page because it was really really really hard for me to understand and more than half of the words in it, I didn't know what they meant. If I knew what it meant I would try to edit that part myself, but I couldn't even start to comprehent what it meant, so I think that someone else will have to do that.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Snow pea lover (talk • contribs) 02:47, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the note, , the language is technical but doesn't appear to be misspelt or confusing. It does, however, need proper referencing and  suspect a copyvio but the content predates the only identical source I could find by almost a decade. The article doesn't seem to need a copy-edit though. Cheers, Baffle☿gab 00:55, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  The part about Physicochemical and physical properties
Template talk:H. G. Wells

message: Is this non-fiction? To quote its first words:
:There are works, and this is one of them, that are best begun with a portrait of the author. And here, indeed, because of a very natural misunderstanding this is the only course to take. Throughout these papers sounds a note, a distinctive and personal note, a note that tends at times towards stridency; and all that is not, as these words are, in Italics, is in one Voice. Now, this Voice, and this is the peculiarity of the matter, is not to be taken as the Voice of the ostensible author who fathers these pages. You have to clear your mind of any preconceptions in that respect. The Owner of the Voice you must figure to yourself as a whitish plump man, a little under the middle size and age, with such blue eyes as many Irishmen have, and agile in his movements and with a slight tonsorial baldness--a penny might cover it--of the crown. His front is convex. He droops at times like most of us, but for the greater part he bears himself as valiantly as a sparrow. Occasionally his hand flies out with a fluttering gesture of illustration. And his Voice (which is our medium henceforth) is an unattractive tenor that becomes at times aggressive. Him you must imagine as sitting at a table reading a manuscript about Utopias, a manuscript he holds in two hands that are just a little fat at the wrist. The curtain rises upon him so. But afterwards, if the devices of this declining art of literature prevail, you will go with him through curious and interesting experiences. Yet, ever and again, you will find him back at that little table, the manuscript in his hand, and the expansion of his ratiocinations about Utopia conscientiously resumed. The entertainment before you is neither the set drama of the work of fiction you are accustomed to read, nor the set lecturing of the essay you are accustomed to evade, but a hybrid of these two.
Surely the presentation of a fictitious essay by a fictitious essayist is a fiction. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 16:38, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: A Modern Utopia
Talk:Viorica Agarici

message: The article says 52 Ro were awarded this weird stuff (which is discriminatory against homos, religiously intolerant, and sexually moralistic). My only issue with this is that the article on RAN lists 53 Ro and 73 from Moldova. The number of 53 is not consistent with the number being given in this article; moreover, I wonder if there were any Romanians among the 73 listed for Moldova. When I say Romanians, I mean people who identified themselves as Ro--and in those days, in R. of Moldova, they probably did so more often than they do today.. --Thus Spake Anittas 23:09, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Righteous Among the Nations
Talk:Barley yellow mosaic virus

message: This article is six years old and still has no references. The unreferenced content may be challenged and removed. MrScorch6200 (talk) 03:49, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Refrences 