lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Legio X Fretensis

message: :Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
*Support, as per nomination--Panairjdde 21:14, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: Since the whole matter seems to be if Caesar's Tenth legion became X Fretensis of X Gemina, why don't we create three articles, one for Fretensis, one for Gemina, and one for Caesar's Tenth (Tenth Legion, if you like)? The former articles will start with augustan reconstitution of the legions, while the latter will deal with Caesar's legion and the "succession problems".--Panairjdde 10:39, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Since it's clear that this'll just end in an edit war otherwise, that seems like the only real option here. --YankeeDoodle14 16:36, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, moved. The text for Caesar's legion is to be added to Tenth Legion, which Legio X redirects to.--Panairjdde 17:06, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal for compromise 

message: Silva was the commander that besieged Masada, he took over after Lucilius Bassus' illness in Judea. apparently Bassus is included as a notable commander yet Silva is not.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.14.222.49 (talk) 15:12, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  I Suggest that Lucius Flavius Silva should be added as a notable commander 

message: The poet David Jones made this note, and I wonder if it has historical substance:
"The Xth Fretensis is said to have furnished the escort party at the execution of Our Lord. It will also be remembered that the Standard Bearer of this Legion distinguished himself at the landing of Caesar's first expedition into Kent (Commentaries iv, 25)."
p.s. I see the second point is covered in Legio X Equestris. Shtove (talk) 13:57, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jesus and invasion of Britain 

message: The Jewish Temple was actually 600 feet south of southern wall of the Haram esh-Sharif, over the Gihon spring. If you actually read Josephus instead of dismissing him offhand, you will see the Jews are worshipping at the western wall of Fort Antonia.Josephus said Fort Antonia completely dominated the Temple mount from the North. He dedicated his book to Emperor Titus and King Agrippa. He also attested to his own veracity. Please read Wars of the Jews objectively.￼ 2601:194:381:7C0:50F7:B284:F074:EDD8 (talk) 19:05, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fort Antonia: The Jewish Temple
Talk:HP LaserJet 4

message: I've still got one of these things, bought new in 1994, and it's going strong as of December 2006.  The self test page shows 39,043 pages (78 reams) printed.  Hardly any jams or problems.  Fabulous piece of engineering.  I'll have to give this thing a proper burial in my back yard when it kicks the bucket. -Timvasquez 02:26, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: They are extraordinary printers. Mine's been in daily (light) use for over 30 years now. Only 44k pages printed, but still.... Dorset100 (talk) 13:47, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Lifespan

message: I too have one. Recently the paper started crinkling at the output, and I have had to gently help the paper out of the exit rollers or it would start to jam. I removed the paper exit section, took off the shiny surface on the rubber rollers with sand paper, put it all back together, and I have a new printer. The motor burned out last year, and for $15 from Ebay, was able to get it going again. Great printer. 21:34, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I'm now having the same exact problem (paper occasionally crinkling), as well as some unexplained jams where the page would get stuck about 1/4th of the way out the slot to being deposited in the output spot or midway through the feed (under the toner).  I'll have to give your sandpaper idea a try... maybe it's the same sort of issue with rollers.  Man, I can't believe I'm still using a 17-year old printer as my main home office printer... I can't say that about ANY other computer equipment I have.  The engineers who designed the HP4 really need some proper recognition.  -Rolypolyman (talk) 19:32, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Problems with aging
Talk:1580 Dover Straits earthquake

message: It seems that most of the geologyshop reference comes from Varley - it would be better if as much as possible of the article could have inline references from a "paper" source such as Varley rather than a non-inline reference to a commercial website. 81.109.183.49 (talk) 12:02, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Referencing
Talk:Legio X Gemina

message: *I know that the tenth fought at Jerusalem. However, I think that it was a different tenth. According to Caesar's Legion, Gemina was the less famous of two legions called the tenth. It seems as though someone put the info for Legio X into this one by mistake. --YankeeDoodle14 21:30, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Stephen Dando-Collins is a rather peculiar historian, since he forgets to cite his sources and comes up with a lot of unknow facts. As long as these claims are not backed, please refrain from adding infos from his books to these pages.--Panairjdde 20:59, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What do you mean? He has one of the longest reference lists I've ever seen. --YankeeDoodle14 21:48, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What is the reference that supports the claim that X Equestris was renamed X Gemina and not X Fretensis?--Panairjdde 09:28, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Exactly. --YankeeDoodle14 04:22, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: ??? "What is the reference that supports the claim that X Equestris was renamed X Gemina and not X Fretensis?" is not a yes/no question, it requires the name of the reference used by Dando-Collins.--Panairjdde 09:25, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Read your question again. You are the one who has asserted that Equestris and Gemina are the same legion, not me. --YankeeDoodle14 17:03, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: So, exactly what are you disputing? You put a tag on the article, are going to explain why?--Panairjdde 21:48, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I dispute that Equestris was later refashioned into Gemina. As I have said many times before, Equestris was refashioned into Fretensis. However since you (Panairjdde) dissagreed and refused to let me edit the articles to that effect, I agreed to keep all three articles seperate. However you are going against your promise here and are trying to keep them together now. Care to explain why? --YankeeDoodle14 20:58, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: So, what is your proof that Equestris became Fretensis?--Panairjdde 21:20, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Still no answer to this fundamental point. We are splitting the article because this Dando says it is Fretensis and not Gemina, yet no proof until now of this.--Panairjdde 15:19, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Different tenth?

message: :Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~ 
:What is the survey about?--Panairjdde 21:19, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "Split this article, yes or no?" --YankeeDoodle14 19:19, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It was already splitted, what are you complaining about?--Panairjdde 11:13, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Jason White (Green Day guitarist)

message: This article is a bit of a mess.Jacknife737 21:36, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The article needs some serious clean up 

message: Still needs some cleanup because of the personal dates  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kongr43gpen (talk • contribs) 17:46, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean Up 

message: There is a little box with info which seems to be correct until "Sexuality: Trisexual".
So he's into animals or shemales or sumtin?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.197.13.157 (talk) 22:27, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sexuality 

message: Ok, couple of nits to pick here:
1. Do we really need a whole section just for one tattoo?
2. Why is the personal information in such small text?
3. What happened to the picture?
I will do all the work. I would just appreciate it if anyone could help me with any of the above questions. Rock drum (talk) 17:17, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nitpicking 

message: Does anybody have a free image of Jason White? This article could really do with it. Rock drum (talk·contribs·guestbook) 18:10, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: http://photobucket.com/images/jason%20white%20green%20day/ Joseph507357 (talk) 18:24, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: Someone said he was in 4 previous videos before 21 Guns and said they excluded the live music videos  but included 21 Guns in the examples. I fixed it but am still confused. They list "Last of the American Girls" as a music video but I don't think there is a video for that song. I din;t know why there would be but if there is can someone clear that up for me and the article?Jason Shew (shewy) (talk) 00:52, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, you'd be right in thinking that "Last of the American Girls" has not yet been released a music video, but, it will be soon. http://tweetphoto.com/10412596 Rock drum (talk·contribs·guestbook) 17:16, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Music Videos 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. First move enacted as proposed, second move generated no consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover) EggRoll97 (talk)  14:52, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Why not, Jason White (guitarist) and Jason White (singer). Seems to disambiguate them enough Mewhen123 (talk) 00:05, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Green Day has been notified of this discussion. Polyamorph (talk) 07:27, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Biography has been notified of this discussion. Polyamorph (talk) 07:27, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 27 October 2023
Talk:Zavallılar

message: I added an infobox to this page. I've never seen this movie nor do I speak Turkish, I was only going by the information already posted, so I may very well be wrong. Jgamekeeper 21:36, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Georges Thierry d'Argenlieu

message: Does anyone else know of other officers, French, Naval or other that was a priest?
V. Joe 20:46, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Query

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 14:21, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008
Talk:Order of Liberation

message: The introduction states that "The last award was bestowed on January 23, 1946." but the article then goes on to mention two further awards, in 1958 and 1960. I'm unwilling to change it without knowing what actually happened, but perhaps the introduction could be reworded?
Teut (talk) 14:55, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last Awarded 

message: The article on Fourragere states that it is worn under medals, and that the Aiguillette is worn over the shoulder.  Is it possible that the wrong word was used in the picture title?
Peter (talk) 13:20, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title of picture of Fourragère 

message: This article's title is in French and not in accordance with the  instructions found in WikiProject Orders, Decorations, and Medals.  No translation to French should be used unless the award is known Worldwide by a specific and historic name, I am correct?  The "Légion d'Honneur" is a good example of an award's name that should remain in French, but is this particular one that well known for this? Fdutil (talk) 14:50, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Salut François.  WP:USEENGLISH is the guiding principal here, unless the common name is in another language, and is most prominently used.  The most prominent example that comes to mind is the Virtuti Militari.  Most any other name is so uncommon, no one would know what you are talking about.  I think this article title should probably be in English and that the name should be Order of the Liberation.  I add the "the" since that is what the Musée de l'Ordre de la Libération uses as an English translation.  EricSerge (talk) 15:39, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree except "the" doesn't sound right in English bofire "Liberation".  One of the intricacies of the English language.  I know this seems funny (weird), but it gives it a french accent. Fdutil (talk) 17:29, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, you're right.  When I say it out loud, it sounds odd.  I guess I mentally gloss over the french accent in the written word.  EricSerge (talk) 23:12, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: "Order of the Liberation" is perfectly correct English usage for this award. Use of the definite article ('the') makes it a specific liberation, in this case liberation from German occupation in World War II. Failing to use the definite article makes it generic and implies a usage that this award doesn't have. AusTerrapin (talk) 16:18, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with AusTerrapin on this point. Invertzoo (talk) 18:19, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: DISCUSSION on article title
Talk:Philippe Kieffer

message: The link for "North Fleet" in the paragraph describing Kieffer's early war service seems to link to a Russian naval formation. Is there an appropriate article? Maybe the fleet has a different name in its modern formation? 2607:FEA8:601:EB00:610F:CD21:9E32:1BD3 (talk) 16:56, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  North Fleet link error
Talk:French submarine Surcouf

message: Hi all,
We received an email a few minutes ago regarding this article, and a possible error in it:
If someone more knowledgeable on the subject could evaluate these concerns and make any necessary edits to the article, it'd be much appreciated.
Regards,Daniel (talk) 08:31, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested change/error fix 

message: The second to the last sentence of the main part of "Fate" states "The wreck lies 3,000 m (9,800 ft) deep at 10°40′N 79°32′WCoordinates: 10°40′N 79°32′W."  However, the first sentence of the sub-section of "Fate," "Theories," states "...her wreck has yet to be discovered..."  The reference for the location of the wreck is in French, which I don't read.  So, has the wreck been found, or not?
Wjl2 (talk) 08:43, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Seconded. This is quite confusing. I checked the reference, but it doesn't help: It says that the sinking after the collision with the "Thomson Lykes" is "the official story" - of the French Navy or who it doesn't say - and also gives no further evidence or source for any of this. My guess is that someone just took the position which "Thomson Lykes" reported for its collision and checked the depth on a map. But aren't we all glad that we can cite a source, however crappy it may be?
The coordinates are the approximate location of Surcouf's (supposed) collision with the Thompson Lykes.  Her wreck has not been located.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.182.35.81 (talk) 04:16, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wreck found, or not? 

message: The article says that the french naval forces mostly "accepted willingly" the British ultimatum to "re-join the fight against Germany, be put out of reach of the Germans or scuttle the ships." This is not particularly helpful as it stands now. Which of the three did they eventually do? All of them? (With different decisions for different units of course being possible.) Or was there a majority for one of the options?
But this article is about the Surcouf. Obviously it complied with none of the options, or why did British forces take the boat with a fight? But still it is not included in the "notable exceptions". All this is quite confusing at the moment, and needs to be cleared up. --BjKa (talk) 17:42, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  1940-07-03 

message: The article states that the guns were in a turret, which would mean the housing could rotate. Is this true?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.47.46.243 (talk) 00:53, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  8" guns in a turret?
Talk:Honoré d'Estienne d'Orves

message: Outside of the lack of cited references, I have no complaints or criticisms on any particular point - just needs expansion overall, if there is any to be had. LordAmeth 00:55, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: WP:MILHIST Assessment
Talk:Dog on the Tuckerbox

message: Does anyone understand the Wikimedia Commons graphics file system?
The "three shades of grey" photo of the bullock team at the unveiling of the monument in 1932 cleaned up quite nicely, and I was "apparently" successful in replacing the previous version (25kb to 38kb), but it looks identical to the earlier version and definitely not what I uploaded. I tried uploading the modified picture under a different name but it was rejected as being identical to an existing file, i.e. the one I had just added. Any ideas? Doug butler (talk) 23:35, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bullock team photo
Talk:Jules Dumont d'Urville

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 11:39, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: I'm not sure that I used the appropriate template to tag the section "In the Aegean Sea", so please correct if wrong. I believe some clarification of the respective roles of Voutier and Dumont in the discovery of the Venus de Milo is required. The article as it presently stands completely eliminates Voutier from the story, and hands the distinction of discovery to Dumont, who appears to have been very keen to promote the idea. However, I am not a skilled historian or scholar and believe that somebody more knowledgeable than I am should review the section and, if necessary, rewrite it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wjl72 (talk • contribs) 21:32, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The discovery of the Venus de Milo. 

message: The claim that Dumont d'Urville named the island of Adele after his wife (cited in a supposedly reliable source, The Encyclopedia of New Zealand) cannot be true. The name of the island appears on Freycinet's map of Australia published in 1811 (based on earlier expeditions in 1801-04), which was well before d'Urville had even sailed for the first time (1814) or married (1816)! More likely an apocryphal story someone made up, possibly d'Urville himself. Vacarme (talk) 18:12, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Adele island
Talk:List of Assyrian musicians

message: This is a list of musicians rather than an article. All the musicians have been linked, though most links are red.
In my opinion, this list has been wikified to the degree it can be. Therefore, I am removing the wikify tag.  KarenAnn 21:45, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is allsow other musicians in this list that is not Assyrians. If you are serious: look first at the bakground of the person and then write.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.66.239.125 (talk) 20:37, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other musicians in this list 

message: Common practice is that lists such as this are limited to those  notable  enough for Wikipedia articles, as shown either by having them, or by being clearly eligible,. The list needs considerable trimming.    DGG ( talk ) 00:18, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: work needed

message: I propose to merge List of Assyrian musicians into List of ethnic Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs. I think that the content in the former article does not warrant its own separate Wikipedia page, since the list of ethnic Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs page keeps a list of all notable Assyrians in all fields, including music. Furthermore, even though the List of ethnic Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs page has a section for Assyrians in all fields of notability (politics, athletic, media, business, etc) when you get to the musicians and composers section, it just redirects to this page. I don't see why we can't just put this list under the musicians and composers section since it's currently empty with the exception of a redirect to this page. Thank you. Ninos2576 (talk) 06:34, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger Proposal
Talk:Dry drowning

message: Hi.
Sorry but this article is deeply flawed.
Dry drowning implies drowning with no liquid entering the lungs, supposedly due to laryngospasm while immersed in a liquid. Once profound hypoxia emerges then the spasm is broken and water flows in. That's all!
What is described at some length is negative pressure pulmonary oedema which is a seperate process though is can also occur in the setting of laryngospasm.
Also the list of causes given is ridiculous and largely related to causes of hypoxia and ventilatory dysfunction...
A quick glance at the references confirms that this article could do with a wee bit more work!
-Rory.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.61.68.252 (talk) 13:58, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: comment

message: A foodconsumer.org article Boy dies of "dry drowning" on the same incident as the one mentioned above had some info about warning signs:   "...there are three signs to notice in a child who is at risk of water entering the respiratory system, namely difficulty breathing, extreme tiredness, and changes in behavior." and they sited Dr Daniel Rauch from an appearance on "TPTODAY". Mscalora (talk) 02:42, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Warning Signs 

message: Read a similar story here http://people.com/human-interest/four-year-old-dies-dry-drowning/ which claims that the cause is from lung irritation in response to an amount of water in the lungs, proceeding to fill them with fluid (for some reason). However this doesn't appear consistent with the causes on this page.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.230.130.6 (talk) 15:25, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: This news article (fr) refers to the same death. http://www.webmd.com/children/features/secondary-drowning-dry-drowning distinguishes "dry drowning" as immediately after coming out of the water vs "secondary drowning" which can occur up to a few days later. Another webmd reference is her: http://www.webmd.com/children/news/20140602/dry-drowning-faq  Neither of these are medical research articles, but webmd seems to be serious in terms of science-for-the-public websites. A merge into drowning seems reasonable to me, unless someone with enough knowledge feels that a WP:SPLIT is justified. Boud (talk) 08:02, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: A merge to drowning with redirect would probably be the best way out of this. I will tag with the proposal • • • Peter (Southwood) (talk): 20:38, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  June 2017 event + references + merge probably needed
Talk:Julien Cosmao

message: A nice start; I especially like the inclusion of Napoleon's quote. The intro needs expansion - despite being accurate and concise, no intro should ever be that short. And the overall text could use some copyediting and expansion. But, a very nice start. LordAmeth 07:53, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: WP:MILHIST Assessment

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 14:58, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008
Talk:Philippe de Gaulle

message: In the Honours section, it says, "Philippe would not have been undeserving of this honor, given his immediate engagement in Free France and his service in the army for five years..."
Yet the rest of the article elaborates on his service in the navy, not the army, and says he served from World War II until his retirement in 1980, obviously much longer than five years. 108.69.222.31 (talk) 19:39, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article is confusing re: military service