Talk:Built environment

message: This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 05:54, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests January 2012 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 03:17, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Bosphorus Bridge Night.jpg Nominated for Deletion

message: By its lead, this article focuses on the term "built environment." It should thus discuss the way the term "built environment" is used in academia. Necessarily, this includes examples of what studies consider well-designed or poorly-designed built environments, but the article currently focus too much on sustainable development topics advocated by people that study the built environment, which is logically separate. Knight of Truth (talk) 18:14, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not broad enough 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Built environment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://Street%20Smart%20Walk%20Score
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081122061610/http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/book.asp?ref=9781405161107&site=1 to http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/book.asp?ref=9781405161107&site=1
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081217063313/http://www.lawlectures.co.uk/bear2006/chynoweth.pdf to http://www.lawlectures.co.uk/bear2006/chynoweth.pdf
*Added  tag to http://designinghealthycommunities.org/,
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:55, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Built environment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120511085256/http://www2.walkscore.com/pdf/WalkScoreMethodology.pdf to http://www2.walkscore.com/pdf/WalkScoreMethodology.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:04, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I agree with Knight of Truth's comment from 2015. The meaning of "built environment" itself is under-explained and focus is given instead to conversations about the built environment in the public health field. I would recommend expanding or rewriting the lead, history, and modern built environment sections so that base knowledge of the concept is established before delving into more specific examples. The first sentence is also a close paraphrase of the first Google result for "built environment" and is not cited as such, which makes me question the validity of the citations. Echoing Knight of Truth again, more attention should be paid to academia.
The public health section has a lot of good information that I think could be distributed. For example, walkability has a larger range of effects beyond public health (e.g. accessibility of schools, public transit, social connectivity). That info could be placed in a broader section, or even given its own header and expanded in more directions than just public health. 
As for the rest of the article, I think the focus needs to be adjusted to support the core information.  The public health section should be shortened and the landscape architecture section should be expanded, and other relevant examples should be included to round out the scope. Overall, the subsections should give equal weight to the examples that show the breadth of the built environment and how it is incorporated in every aspect of the man-made world. Emilyp99 (talk) 14:43, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broaden scope and adjust focus 

message: I made some general comments above, and I've now begun some research to start working on this page. The built environment is often discriminatory against minorities or people of low-income, which I'd like to highlight. Check out my user page for more thoughts and a list of sources I'd like to use, and feel free to comment on my talk page! Emilyp99 (talk) 22:18, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the addition of “Prominent features of the built environment” sections were very useful and clarified some information, as well as brought some aspects of social justice into the article. I also think the restructuring and adding physical activity to a new section titled “Impact on the built environment” was a good idea. I know that more additions to the article will be made, but I would focus on expanding the housing and segregation section, and the public health section. I also believe that it is very important to make sure that the information you add fits in with what is already there to prevent redundancy and to create a flow of ideas. Overall, great job and keep up the good work -Angelalin79 (talk) 16:57, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

text: Greetings! I wanted to offer some feedback I identified after completing a peer-review of this article. As a whole, it does a great job of providing more comprehensive insight into the concept of the Built Environment and does a wonderful job of highlighting intersectionality throughout it as well. This article could be potentially improved by expanding on a more global perspective and potentially restructuring the “Prominent features…” section to reduce redundancy. Asmaley (talk) 17:08, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Revision Plans and References

message: Subheadings should be lower case. Viriditas (talk) 08:42, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  MOS