lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Coptic Catholic Patriarchate of Alexandria

message: what does the accent do in Stéphanos that distinguishes it from Stephanos? --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 01:25, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see any Google hits for Stéphanos I, naming him instead Stephanos, but I do see consistent hits for Stéphanos II. If that is how they are covered in the WP:RS then that is how Wikipedia covers them, and it isn't our business to analyze the underlying linguistic rules. Elizium23 (talk) 01:53, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: does it affect the pronunciation? --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 17:16, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  first name 

message: "all Coptic dioceses, mostly in and around Egypt (where all its sees are)"  It seems that either the sees are all in Egypt (one interpretation of the sentence) or in and around Egypt (another interpretation).  In either case, what does "mostly" mean?--Richardson mcphillips (talk) 17:20, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  where are its sees
Talk:Roger Etchegaray

message: What’s missing from this entry is his role the Council which, in addition to what is said in this excerpt from the CEF biography, brought him to the attention of Paul VI. Here’s the excerpt:
 Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 13:17, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vatican Council 

message: Please feel free to add them back to the article by adding reliable source--DBigXrayᗙ 14:01, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need sources
Talk:Dalmuir

message: "There have been rumours that Robert Thompson, one of the ten-year-old boys who murdered Liverpool toddler James Bulger in 1993, is currently living in the area, although there is no concrete evidence to suggest this."
If there's no concrete evidence to suggest this, do we really need it in the article? Or are these pervasive rumours that are of great significance to the community? If so, could we have a citation please? =) --Lor 21:47, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fine by me, I'll take out speculation now. --Lor 08:38, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Kokkari

message: You have a beautiful town. I wikified your page.  KarenAnn 21:50, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The result was: Merge as proposed. --B. Wolterding 16:58, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems like a perfect merge. I would do this without waiting too long unless you receive a negative reaction shortly. --Stormbay 21:22, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Fine. I usually wait at least a week to give others the chance to weigh in; if there's no further response, I will merge the text then. --B. Wolterding 11:48, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposed (Tsamadou Beach) 
Talk:Valerie Wilson

message: novak still calls her by this name as of yesterday. kzz* 21:57, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

message: The allegation, that Armitage outed Valerie Wilson (ne Plame) is still a debatable point. Simply because Richard Armitage thinks that he was the person who initially divulged her identity does not mean that he is in fact the person who initially outed Plame to Novack. In fact Novak, despite the fact that Armitage has pointed the finger of guilt at himself, has not agreed that Armitage was his first source of the Wilson/Plame information. Wjbean
Yes, he has.  Read here:   Unschool 23:31, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Armitage 

message: Hi, I left the note below on the discussion page for 216.179.123.145, thinking that you'd see it there.  But you must be using a non-static IP, so I guess I should have just left it here.  Please read this and respond.  Thanks. Unschool 17:25, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Valerie Wilson, lottery winner
Talk:One-place study

message: Both of the external links listed on the bottom of this article looks rather stale, but I don't know of any good directory of one-place studies on the Web. If it exists, I'd love to hear about it.. --leifbk 22:04, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes -- the link to Hawgood's website under "References" has been removed by him because it was becoming out-of-date. I haven't seen a replacement, nor does Hawgood seem to be updating it. --Michael K. Smith (talk) 15:43, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Agostino Cacciavillan

message: WikiProject Biography ratings by Auroranorth 12:10, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Newspaper from the future

message: I changed the date of the Wells story from 1918 to 1931: if you read it (it's on Project Gutenberg Australia), you'll see it's set in 1931, and refers to 1931 as the present day. I take that at its face value, as there's this sentence:  Or, again, one might suppose he had really seen into the future with a sort of exaggeration of those previsions cited by Mr. J.W. Dunne in his remarkable "Experiment with Time.". And that was published in 1927    Malcolm Farmer 22:05, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

message: Perhaps the best thing to do with this somewhat narrowly focused article is to develop a more general article on Newspapers in fiction, and merge it into that as a section. bd2412 T 23:16, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible merge/refactoring.
Talk:Herbert Silberer

message: I´ve beefed up this page on Sliberer and included a brief analysis of his book. I´m probably one of the few people who have a) heard of him and b) have read his work. He was clearly a remarkable man and unjustly neglected in the history of psychoanalysis. I hope this article will encourage someone to read him. ThePeg 22:32, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Patrick J. McGrath

message: Can some citations be provided here and then maybe a rewrite if notable? Thank you, --Malerooster (talk) 21:09, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversey section over Mel Gibson and the passion of the Christ and what have you. 
Talk:Bergen (disambiguation)

message: I say we make Bergen, Norway the article for Bergen and link to Bergen (disambig) from that page. Which means some has to move Bergen as it is now, to Bergen (disambig) and Bergen, Norway to Bergen.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.108.198.181 (talk • contribs) 
:I certainly wouldn't oppose. The location in Norway must by far be the best known of the different possibilies, but I'd like more input on this one. If others agree, it might be a candidate for WP:RM. Valentinian (talk) 16:05, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Bergen, Norway is the absolutely most prominent of the places. As far as I can tell all other Bergen places are either towns or places that are called more than Bergen. Arsenikk 22:39, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Agree. Bergen, Norway is by far the most popular and obvious target. All others are small places qualified by district or geography (eg rivers). See the expansion of the page Bergen on the other possibilities. The German page has more links not found in the En wikipedia. Welsh 21:16, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Support. Seems sensible. Cordless Larry 16:05, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: ;Australia
*Bergen, New South Wales, a suburb of Sydney
**Bergen train station, a station of the city of Sydney
;Canada
*Bergen, New Brunswick
*Bergen, Newfoundland and Labrador
*Bergen, Nova Scotia
**Bergen-Halifax-Dartmouth
*Bergen, Ontario
;New Zealand
*Bergen, New Zealand
;United Kingdom
* Bergen, Bristol
* Bergen, Cornwall
* Bergen, Northamptonshire
* Bergen, Nottinghamshire
* Bergen, Tyne and Wear
Please feel free to readd once the page has been created or there is an associated blue link. Thanks, France3470 (talk) 20:31, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Items removed per [[WP:DABRL]]
Talk:Tina Wood

message: I'm fairly confident she was born in  North Carolina and returns there for holidays (as discussed on a old episode), however I cannot find a source.  I do know the last edit had this Wood confused with this Wood.  AC/DC tribute band.  Sthuper lame. ->Btl 22:16, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The origins of the Wood 

message: I think someone should change the info. Tina has made a post at channel 10 recently.
http://www.on10.net/blogs/tina/Download-and-Vote-for-your-favorite-Video-Game/Default.aspx  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.160.17.246 (talk) 23:03, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tina Wood info
Talk:Yellowbook

message: In a recent edit, anonymous user 12.175.119.20 stated that he "Removed innaccurate edits, mostly regarding distribution." [sic] It would appear that he removed ALL information regarding distribution, sales practices, environmental issues and just about everything else, leaving what is basically a self-serving 'advertisement' for Yellow Book.
Rather than delete what was stated in the expanded article, it would be more useful if he could add his own view of Yellow Book's distribution practices or environmental practices, etc. Or, if he believes there was a specific factual error, then please contribute by adding a more accurate version. Please note that some of the distribution information in the 'expanded' article (which you deleted) came directly from Yellow Book's official website.
Dave5358 (talk) 14:54, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: An anon editor
Talk:Quasi-phase-matching

message: This a great article but it isn't general enough.  Quasi-phase-matching is a general technique that can be used in any nonlinear interaction in any medium - not just a two-wave mixing process in crystals. It can be implemented by creating a periodic structure in the nonlinearity of the medium, or, less commonly, the refractive index of the medium.  I'll try adding some more info--J S Lundeen 22:18, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Lake Nokomis

message: So Nokomis.... it looks like either a fetus, or badly-deformed kidney or a hipbone.... Hmm.
--Ryanjcole 22:19, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ambrose Spencer

message: * Wasn't sure about which one to fix the redlink with.  Either Lyons (town), New York or Lyons (village), New York.  Couldn't find much either way, just a rootsweb article, but it didn't have any sources either -- MrDolomite | Talk 22:20, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Lyons, NY
Talk:Epic of King Gesar

message: I have added a section of the translation by Herrmanns (fascinating but in every sense havy book!) and the corresponding reference. Left the unreferenced-mark because I don't know the source of the remaining material in the article and don't have the time to check it. Nannus 22:21, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article Geser seems to be about the same thing.  Can we merge it in to this article?  --HughCharlesParker (talk - contribs) 10:08, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's similar, and undoubtedly related, but it's not the same thing.  The Epic of King Gesar is a Tibetan Buddhist text, the Geser Epic is a Mongolian Tengriist text. -- Takwish 19:09, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: But they are the same story.  Surely that means that we should have one article about it.  Of course, the differences, comparisons etc should be brought out in the article.  --HughCharlesParker (talk - contribs) 15:34, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from Geser 

message: I've nominated the Oral transmission section for a POV-check as the prose is less than neutral, and the supporting citations sketchy at best. —Viriditas | Talk 12:55, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems to me that the citations tag is more appropriate. Its not that the language is not neutral, it is that it makes claims that should be substantiated.Sylvain1972 (talk) 15:51, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oral transmission 

message: The claim appears twice that the epic has over a million verses and/or takes weeks to recite. For example:
"Combining the variants together, the epic is perhaps the longest literary work in the world, containing over 20 million words in more than one million verses. A given Gesar singer would know only his local version, which nonetheless would take weeks to recite."
First this combining of variations wouldn't be valid unless they are distinct stories with non-overlapping verse. Second, it's difficult to believe a person can memorize "weeks" worth of verse.
These statements need to be fact checked and references added.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.36.152.32 (talk) 12:52, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Supposed Length 

message: From the current text: "It was this text which formed the basis for the first Western-language translation, published by the Moravian missionary Isaak Jakob Schmidt in 1836.[78] A German translation followed in 1839."
So what language was the first 'western' translation?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.232.250.50 (talk) 14:14, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Russian. His Подвиги Гессер-Хана was published in St.Petersburg that year. This was then translated into German.Nishidani (talk) 14:29, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  First Western Translation - what Language?
Talk:Hypertriglyceridemia

message: I also found this paper interesting Omega-3 fatty acid supplementation accelerates chylomicron triglyceride clearance — Preceding unsigned comment added by  (talk • contribs) 
:True, but contradicted by some other sources. JFW | T@lk 12:49, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Omega 3

message: It would be good, if reliable citations are available, to say in the article whatever is known about whether exercise is helpful in treating this condition. If nothing for sure is known either way,I say it would be of value to say that, at least.--Richard L. Peterson71.198.176.141 (talk) 06:12, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I might be able to add something on the basis of the new guideline, but in the absence of data from there we should limit ourselves to WP:MEDRS-compatible secondary sources. JFW | T@lk 12:49, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Exercise

message: In addition to the new Endocrine Society guideline, perhaps this review might be useful: doi:10.1503/cmaj.060963 JFW | T@lk 15:19, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Another one about pancreatitis, but I can't retrieve the article: doi:10.1097/MOL.0b013e3283319a1d. JFW | T@lk 23:00, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review 

message: I have removed the following, because it is likely to be conflicting with the CPG paper, or at least will need recalibration:
Wondering how to approach this. JFW | T@lk 12:49, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Atherosclerosis

message: doi:10.1016/S2213-8587(13)70191-8 in Lancet Diab Endocrinol. JFW | T@lk 10:53, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  European Atherosclerosis Society Consensus Panel 

message: doi:10.1210/er.2014-1062 Genomic approach. JFW | T@lk 23:40, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Endocrine Rev
Talk:Capitol Broadcasting Tower Columbia

message: I think the city and/or the coords given for the tower might be wrong.  The coords are very far from Columbia, North Carolina.  Are there two Columbia, North Carolinas?  --Shanedidona 22:26, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Coords

message: Hate to confuse things, but perhaps it cold ultimately to clarify them. As I write, I am able to see one of the tallest broadcasting towers I have ever seen, yet I'm in Columbia, South Carolina. I expected to find this tower on the list but it's not, unless perhaps South Carolina is the correct state for the tower in question.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.12.74.131 (talk) 02:21, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Coords

message: To my knowledge Capitol Broadcasting does not own a tower at Columbia, NC. I could be wrong, but I don't think Capitol owns any media outlets that far east to warrant a broadcast tower. There is a large TV tower at Columbia owned by UNC-TV. It is a very large tower and very closely resembles the WRAL TV tower near Garner. The Columbia, NC I speak of is in Tyrell County. Dm46607 07:09, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Ownership
Talk:Joi Internet

message: I used to work for this company. It was run by Israelis Yarov "David" Egosi and his son Yassef.  They got in trouble with the labor board as well, for not allowing people to take lunch and for re-adjusting their pay schedule several times during the course of business without notifying their employees. ----Julien Deveraux 22:30, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:NACCO Industries

message: Lacking any mention of Kitchen Collection in this article to indicate that it is a NACCO Industries brand name, I'm redirecting it to kitchen utensil. Wbm1058 (talk) 20:57, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Undid my redirect: confirmed that, per , Kitchen Collection is a NACCO Industries subsidiary company. Wbm1058 (talk) 14:19, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kitchen Collection
Talk:Netscape Public License

message: What does this mean:
Its most notable feature is that it gives the original developer of Mozilla (Netscape, now a subsidiary of Time Warner), the right to distribute modifications made by other contributors under whatever terms it desires, including proprietary terms, without granting similar rights to those other contributors in respect of the contribution of the original developer.
Okay so I can get through the first part. It gives Netscape the right to distribute others' changes to the source however it wishes. Is the second part supposed to mean that third parties are not allowed to redistribute the Netscape code? Theshibboleth 22:31, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: What?
Talk:Trust (business)

message: This contradicts what is said on John Jacob Astor's page. 
Make consistent or delete.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by DoctorBakerFineShoemaker (talk • contribs) 03:56, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: March 2014

message: Cartels and trusts are somewhat different - a cartel is a formalised oligopoly. So I oppose merge
:I oppose as well. BoojiBoy 15:18, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: July 2006

message: Redirected to trust law. This is obviously a POV fork and the information in this article should be included in trust.70.31.95.62 (talk) 21:18, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Not a POV fork; a distinct usage of the term. A 19th century "trust" is not a "trust company" in the modern sense.--Srleffler (talk) 17:15, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: September 2009

message: Question: my son had a 10th grade homework assignment with a question about the Standard Oil Trust.  We went to the Standard Oil wiki page, then to this Trust page for the answer, but didn't find it.  So here is the question: if Standard Oil (for example) was already incorporated, why was it converted into a trust?  What is the advantage of a trust over other corporate legal structures for large monopolistic businesses?  In a similar vein, Srleffler's statement of the difference between a 19th century "trust" and a modern "trust company" should be elaborated on in the article --tfdavisatsnetnet (talk) 02:00, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: October 2013
Talk:Special Commitment Center

message: "It is controversial in that it allows the involuntary commitment of people who have served their judge-ordered sentence." This sentence needs a citation and rewording that makes it clear who finds the practice controversial. (I'd expect maybe the News Tribune may be somewhere to look for a verifiable citation).
This article should probably be merged into McNeil Island Corrections Center if an article shows up for it. Whitejay251 22:40, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it is not part of the McNeil Island Corrections Center.  It is run by the Department of Social and Health Services.  Yllt (talk) 23:24, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Theodotus of Ancyra

message: I'm pretty sure this page should become a disambiguation page pointing to Theodotus of Ancyra (martyr) and Theodotus of Ancyra (bishop). But since I'm no expert, and the only reference to (bishop) I found in my brief Google search was Britannica's article, I don't feel like creating a two-line dab page and a stub myself. I only got here trying to find Theodotus of Antioch anyway. --Quuxplusone (talk) 20:48, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed split
Talk:Lumen gentium

message: Someone has suggested, without giving any reasons in support of his idea, that the article "Subsistit in" in Lumen Gentium be merged here.
*Oppose  "Subsistit in" is an important concept in its own right, requiring a separate article of appropriate length, not a mere section of another article.  In view of the shortness of the Lumen Gentium article, merging the other material into it would turn it into an article on "subsistit in" but with an inaccurate title.  Lima (talk) 06:35, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: There should maybe be an article about Belgian theologian Gérard Philips, since he generally thought to have been the original ghost writer behind Lumen Gentium, having composed the first draft.   ADM (talk) 13:50, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, the first draft was composed by a committee.  For example, Yves Congar was the primary author of the first draft of sections 1-8 (in Chapter 1) and sections 9, 13, 16, and 17 (in Chapter 2).  According to Congar, Philips did write more than any other single person, and he may deserve an article, but it would be an oversimplification to call him the author.  And the term ghost writer isn't really appropriate; the authors' names were never publicized, but neither was it a secret that the bishops didn't do most of the writing themselves.  In fact, it was well known during the council that the periti (including Yves Congar, Henri de Lubac, Karl Rahner, Joseph Ratzinger, Willy Onclin, Joseph Lecuyer, and many more) were doing most of the actual writing of the documents.  The bishops debated the theoretical content while their periti composed most of the text at the direction of the bishops -- but it was only later that Catholic scholars learned some details of who wrote which parts. — Lawrence King (talk) 01:05, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Gérard Philips

message: Lumen Gentium's Nota explicativa praevia has its own article.  There is a discussion about whether this article -- Nota Praevia -- should be kept as it is, renamed, or merged into the Lumen Gentium article.  If any editors have an opinion, please chime in at Talk:Nota Praevia#RfC: Is "Nota Praevia" a good title? — Lawrence King (talk) 22:30, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate article for the ''Nota explicativa praevia'' 

message: Must this be seen as an unreliable source, given the stature of Christopher Butler, one of the most influential bishops at Vatican II, who is writing his reflections on this website?  Jzsj (talk) 03:15, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:SPS stipulates that  Upon investigation, I would say that 'vatican2voice.org' meets this kind of requirement, and we can safely consider it to be reliable for this kind of subject matter. Elizium23 (talk) 03:23, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bishop Butler's commentary on Vatican II