Talk:Downforce

message: Sorry, any full bodied car can easily create more downforce than an open wheeler, especially if you think to an full bodied single seater like the late CanAm cars. If stock cars downforce is limited its for practical or aesthetic consideration. Ericd 21:12, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

message: :Image:Wierdwings.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 01:51, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Wierdwings.jpg

message: Is the purpose of the downforce done to prevent the nose of the car from rising up? or does it actually increase the friction seen at the wheels?
My gut feel is that the purpose is simply to keep the nose down and prevent the car from flying. A greater downforce/wheel grip can be done by simply increasing mass of the car, and the only time one needs that downforce is when there is a sudden brake, in which case, the downforce itself will drop so .... does it really help at all?
I do not see why a car speeding on a road will skid if the brakes are gradually applied nevermind the aerodynamics.
hehehe well they do use air conduits at the base and inverted wing shapes, but wonder what if it was just a "pipe" which turns upwards at the back..  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alokdube (talk • contribs) 07:21, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Downforce does increase the friction of each wheel, increasing the grip. This is preferable to adding mass, since extra mass reduces acceleration and increases braking distance. The key benefit of downforce is to greatly increase the grip available when cornering. Bobcousins (talk) 22:20, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  purpose 

message: I don't understand te WS x H x AoA part of the formula.. I'd say that for an angle of 0 and for an angle of 90 (or pi/2) the downforce should be zero. So instead of just an angle I'd expect an expression like sin(a) * cos(*). What exactly is meant by H? is it a constant or is it a function of the AoA?
80.56.157.138 (talk) 19:57, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  How to read the formula? 

message: ive added some information i think is useful to many readers. Methods of adding downforce is something i believe the orginal page lacked and this opens the door for future expansion. Ian117harris (talk) 23:41, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding downforce to street cars