lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Oldsmobile Silhouette

message: This is a near idential corporate cousin of the Chevrolet Lumina APV and the Chevrolet Venture. Much of this article is a near clone of the Chevrolet Lumina APV  article and should be merged with it. One section of this article needs to be merged with the Chevrolet Venture article. Novasource 15:35, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with [[Chevrolet Lumina APV]] and [[Chevrolet Venture]]

message: The manner of writing seems to be highly biased against the subject in question, and has no citations. I'm not willing to remove such a large segment, but.. Perhaps someone with a bit more authority could take a look at it? That Thing There (talk) 07:10, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marginal success section 

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 03:42, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]]
Talk:Saturn Relay

message: I would really appreciate it if someone could add an image to this article. I've found some at  , but I'm still getting the hang of uploding images and it would save me alot of aggravation if someone else did it. Thanks- Bavaria 07:23, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Image?

message: Despite GM's marketing, as a corporate clone of the Chevrolet Uplander, this vehicle is still a full blooded Chevrolet Venture and does not merit its own article. "Despite the change in name and outward style, the Chevy Uplander does not represent a full redesign of the Venture -- passenger and cargo space are nearly identical."
Novasource 15:37, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with [[Chevrolet Venture]]

message: Actually, they are completely different vehicles. How is a 3.4-litre V6 that has 185 hosepower at 5,200 rpm similiar to a brand new, redesigned, and remastered 3.9-litre V6 that has 240 horsepower at 6,000 rpm?? Plus, space is still bigger, and almost all of the things are different.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.234.26.170 (talk) 11:41, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Actually, completely different
Talk:Pontiac Montana

message: The bit about the 1998-2005 model talks about the 'superior' pricing, handling, acceleration, etc. over a Dodge Caravan. Have GM employees been futzing around?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.95.151.48 (talk) 01:57, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe it. I have removed the POV. Karrmann 04:08, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Remove bias

message: Despite GM's marketing, as a corporate clone of the Chevrolet Uplander, this vehicle is still a full blooded Chevrolet Venture and does not merit its own article. "Despite the change in name and outward style, the Chevy Uplander does not represent a full redesign of the Venture -- passenger and cargo space are nearly identical."
Novasource 15:37, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with [[Chevrolet Venture]]

message: The Pontiac Montana is having a facelift to attract more buyers  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.224.49.238 (talk) 01:12, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not that I know of. It was cut from the US market, and is surviving in the Canadian market for one more year until they close the plant it is built at. I haven't heard anything about a facelift, nor about it surviving past the 2008 model year. Karrmann 10:23, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Facelift 

message: How do i send you a source from an e-mail i got regadrding the discoutation of the Pontiac Montana Sv6 which they say there is no immediate plans to cancel the Project
which was sent from GM Canada To my E-mail considering i ask them some info on this
:Emails wont work, it must be a source that anyone can verify, see WP:RS. --Daniel J. Leivick (talk) 08:55, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pontiac Montana 

message: If someone ever adds a sorce that says it wont be discounted i will laugh in your face karrmann because ibelive them more than you you are full of shit
leave this article alone or i will report you 
F  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.1.206.186 (talk) 17:05, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: How about the other way around. Leave this article alone or I'll report you. Karrmann (talk) 20:40, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pontiac Montana 

message: Doraville Assembly is closing i know that
but it does't mean that the Pontiac Montana will be discountined according to there website which i looked at recently stated that there are plans currently right now to move the vheicle to a different location in Canada i Belive ..
but time will tell i as hopng maybe you could it as present for canada for the time being  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.224.59.58 (talk) 03:58, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pontiac Montana Doraville Closure 

message: would like to know if someone has had a vibration problem with the montana 2002 model have changed alot but still there  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.104.14.223 (talk) 00:46, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  vibration uin car at above 60 miles per hour
Talk:Opel Sintra

message: This is a near idential corporate cousin of the Chevrolet Lumina APV, Pontiac Trans-Sport & Oldsmbile Silhouette and should be merged with it. Novasource 15:40, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, this isn't a corporate cousin of the Lumina APV, this is more similar to the Chevrolet Venture/Pontiac Montana/Oldsmobile Silhouette triumvirate of U-bodys than anything else, but this was the Opel/Vauxhall version that flopped.  I don't think it should be merged with the Lumina APV, since the Lumina APV actually pre-dates the Sintra.  -Daniel Blanchette 15:31, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with [[Chevrolet Lumina APV]]
Talk:Assateague Island

message: There are many signs stating that "Wild Ponies Bite & Kick" and that you shouldn't feed them or any of the other wildlife.  I've lived minutes away from Assateague my entire life on the Eastern Shore of Maryland, and I wanted people to be aware of this. I see people feeding the ponies almost every time I visit the refuge, everything from Peanut Butter & Jelly sandwiches to Snickers Bars, and it has to stop. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Smowk (talk • contribs) 15:41, 22 January 2006 
___________
someone should move that pony picture. it blocks text in safari. 69.143.13.254 00:58, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

message: Please keep this in mind when editing articles. This article contains a bit of advertising and a warning basically telling people to read signs and not feed the wild ponies. I'm sure the later was done with the best of intentions but this is an encyclopedia. This is not a place to advertise or post public service announcements.-Jeff (talk) 10:26, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikipedia is an encyclopedia

message: Assateague is remarkable for its wealth of bird life. The ponies are there and attract many tourists, and it is amazing to see them there in the wild; but you also see many people with scopes and binoculars on the roadside looking at birds. I think that aspect could be better represented in the article, and I'll add some things when I have time and references at hand.
Nathan43 (talk) 01:29, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Wildlife on Assateague

message: There's no map. I feel like there ought to be a map.-Ich (talk) 03:12, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Map?
Template talk:Non-free with permission

message: What is the point of this tag, if the image can be used under fair use, why would we ask for permission? They could say no and we don't need it. It just confuses people making them think they can ask for permission for wikipedia only, then use this tag, when  is the correct tag to use. - cohesion 00:04, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Exactly. Someone put this on an image which I had uploaded with the express permission of the copyright holder (my lecturer). But the fair use bit is irrelevant, it's simply an authorised use. Is there a more appropriate tag for the situation I'm in? Psychobabble 03:29, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The tag you are looking for is , but that means we cannot use the image. Wikipedia can't use images that we have sole permission for, they need to be freely licensed, for example under the GFDL or Creative Commons or usable under fair use. See the image use policy for more info. - cohesion 23:08, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

text: If the image was distribute as part of a Electronic Press Kit, then Wikipedia as part of the mass media is given permission to use the image. This does not extend to third parties. --Petri Krohn 00:00, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Right, so what benefit does this tag add that the normal fair use tags and rationale lack? - cohesion 23:08, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: NFCC#2, for one thing. It's not infringement if the copyright owner wants us to use it. -Nard 21:11, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ha, I'm still watching this :) Ehh, I dunno, it's not very often that #2 is the only thing that is wrong with an image. I don't care that strongly, it's not bad, just useless imo :) - cohesion 01:45, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

text: Oops, that was wrong.  --Thinboy00 talk/contribs @988, i.e. 22:42, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  what's the point 

message: I have removed the 'deprecated image copyright' tag as it was added without discussion or comment. As far as I can tell, tagging it as deprecated is incorrect, as there exists no substitute for this template, and it is still being actively used. Additionally, per the May 2009 deletion discussion, it appears that the community still supports the use of this template. LK (talk) 04:07, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template still in active use 

message: Before proposing for deletion, will proposers please read through the previous deletion discussions? It's pretty clear that some still find this template useful and see a reason to keep it. Also, if proposing for deletion, please make sure to link to the previous deletion discussions in the proposal. LK (talk) 09:11, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion proposals

message: "fair-use image tag" is not linked. It says you need one of these. I think it should be linked here Wikipedia:File copyright tags, to look like this; fair-use image tag--Wyn.junior (talk) 17:23, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interlink needed
Talk:Buick GL8

message: Buick recently unveiled a new version of the GL8 called the GL8 Century (which is likely either the 4th gen of the GL8, or a very heavy 2nd facelift of the 3rd gen). Figured it should be added to the page. 2601:602:B00:71C1:3C1B:1A15:41AB:8D4C (talk) 11:41, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Generation (or heavy facelift)
Talk:Asteroid impact avoidance/to do

message: * Add Footnotes
;From AID nominations page:
* Very important topic, with big media resonance. Solid, uncontroversial, and interesting topic, with lots of information available on it and strong connections to many other articles. Reorganise, expand, and add a few images, and it could be wonderful. --Fangz 10:13, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Christopher Blair

message: I don't remember Bluehair in WC1 being a silent protagonist - he's always making comments in the briefings and debriefings. --70.252.212.69 16:10, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Houston Post

message: According to the Handbook of Texas entry on the Houston Post (see link on article page), the Hobby family/business sold the paper much later than 1983, so I deleted that bit of information.—Bellhalla 16:24, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What does this picture have to do with the Houston Post???Rlbarton (talk) 18:52, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, good question. I can't find anything on them, either. TexianPolitico (talk) 20:33, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Red Head Widows 
Talk:A Moment to Remember

message: I cleanup up his entry, rewrote the synopsis so that it was lest pov and a little more concise. Probably still needs someone who saw the movie to go over it.  I just went on what was there. I'm removing the cleanup tag because it's probably ok now, though an expert's attention would be good for content checking --Lendorien 22:35, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup
Talk:Mustafa Ahmed al-Hawsawi

message: The above referenced page is much more complete and clearly refers to the same person
:This is not a move, but a merge. —Nightstallion (?) 09:16, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess it's technically a merge, but I don't recommend retaining ANY of the information on this page. I just want to put in a redirect. Which I have now done. jackbrown 17:21, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: shrugs Fine. —Nightstallion (?) 09:47, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hey!  What is the big idea censoring the information that phone records showed Al-Marri called Al-Hawsawi was sufficient to justify classifying Al-Marri as an illegal combatant?  --  Geo Swan 07:02, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Whistler, British Columbia

message: I'm doing some manual Timezone verification, and this is one of a few pages that either has nothing, is missing some data, or has wrong data. The PDT information was not there so I added it.  Enjoy :)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.67.138.44 (talk) 04:05, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Daylight Saving TimeZone information missing 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Not moved. WP:SNOW closure (no pun intended).   -- Calidum 17:26, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 28 February 2021
Talk:Prince Rupert, British Columbia

message: It appears to be of a Regional District, or...federal riding?  This is not a point-location map as with other BC towns; I've never liked the basemap used for these anyway, but Prince Rupert does definitely not include the Charlottes...Skookum1 07:10, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The yellow rectangle marking the city location wasn't very obvoius on that map. It should be clear now, with a dot overlaid on the regional district map. Qyd(talk)15:14, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Map is wrong...

message: Should Prince Rupert Harbour be merged under the Transport-Seaport section? I think it should... Sebastian32 03:23, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge [[Prince Rupert Harbour]]? 

message: Uh, "City of Rainbows"?  You have to have sunshine to have rainbows.....is that a city slogan?  It should state it that way; "known as" implies/states that other people know the sobriquet; I'm from BC and I don't.  A similar rain-country pitchline is "Rainbow Country" for the Chilliwack-Upper Fraser Valley area.  At least they have more than 100 days of sunshine.  Which brings me to teh family from South Africa who were granted asylum in Canada so their sunlight-allergic kids could play outside (i.e. in Prince Rupert).  I don't have a cite or I'd add the story.Skookum1 (talk) 12:52, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Weather section

message: *I wuz lookin' in BC Archives and found this very cool pic.  If used, license after trimming off frame can be .  This is the description of the image..Skookum1 (talk) 21:17, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: cool pic

message: Some data of designed maximal capacity and actual traffic, both for containers and other goods, would be a good addition here. 
http://www.rupertport.com/container.htm states a design capacity of 500,000 TEU/year. But giving only the design capacity without the actual traffic would be rather odd, IMHO.
--Pjacobi (talk) 17:21, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Harbour data 

message: I'm not grasping the meaning of the reference to "the" great circle route.  The article states:
"Located on the Great Circle Route between eastern Asia and western North America..."
and later:
"It is located along the Pacific Great Circle Route between Asia and the west coast of North America;..."
But this seems incorrect.  According to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_circle,
"For any two points on the surface of a sphere there is a unique great circle through the two points."
Which means that Prince Rupert is not unique in being on a Great Circle path from Asia.
Also, I can't find reference to a "Pacific Great Circle Route" going through Prince Rupert.  I found this map of a "North Pacific Great Circle Route" but even that passes south of Canada.
I think the referenced parts of the article should be removed or cited.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.248.164.37 (talk) 11:23, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The" Great Circle Route
Talk:The Joys of Yiddish

message: the original quote for the riddle goes as follows:
The first riddle I ever heard, one familiar to almost every Jewish child, was propounded to me by my father:
"What is it that hangs on the wall, is green, wet -- and whistles?"
I knit my brow and thought and thought, and in final perplexity gave up.
"A herring," said my father.
"A herring," I echoed. "A herring doesn't hang on the wall!"
"So hang it there."
"But a herring isn't green!" I protested.
"Paint it."
"But a herring isn't wet."
"If it's just painted it's still wet."
"But -- " I sputtered, summoning all my outrage, "-- a herring doesn't whistle!!"
"Right, " smiled my father. "I just put that in to make it hard."
-- Leo Rosten, "The Joys of Yiddish"
is it OK to add it to the main page from a copyright's point of view?
Looks like fair use to me.  Added.  --John Cowan (talk) 19:06, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: More information comparing the editions would be great to have. Can't seem to find much online though -Dan Eisenberg (talk) 05:12, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The Joys of Yinglish states (on page xi): "This is an entirely new book. It is freshly conceived and freshly written, from this page to the last. It is built upon the foundation of the Joys of Yiddish, which was published in 1968, and Hooray for Yiddish, which appeared in 1982". Seems to contradict lead of article and I may go in and correct soon. -Dan Eisenberg (talk) 19:43, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  More information comparing the editions would be great to have.
Talk:Bon Voyage

message: Could you please add under Other Uses Category: 
Bon Voyage, a family travel magazine founded in 2009 in Brussels, Belgium
also
External Links
Bon Voyage Magazine,www.bonvoyagemagazine.com       Sheridanbecker (talk) 11:15, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: In every terms, the French bomber is the greatest trick the Grey’s incredible series 2600:8800:7181:FDE0:44BF:73A1:FEC5:DF1F (talk) 18:21, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

message: At present, the page claims that bon voyage is a French phrase meaning "goodluck". This is incorrect: it actually means have a good journey. Bonne chance means "good luck". I'm changing this and moving the definition to the top of the page until someone proves otherwise. --Jrothwell (? | !) 18:33, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Good luck?

message: I'm not sure it's the right place to write that, but, be careful.
"Bon voyage" means literally in french "Good trip" ==> "Have a nice trip".
"Good journey" is "Bonjour" or "Bonne journée" in a goodbye way.
As I'm a french guy, I couldn't let that going on.
Cheers  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.221.175.178 (talk) 14:51, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Bon voyage" means literally "Good trip"
Talk:Egg War

message: I changed "flavour" to "flavor".  My rationale, eventhough the manual of style indicates that the article should retain the original variant, was that that is but one of two concerns, the other being consistency within the article.  The article uses "Common Murre" (eventhough the redirect to Common Guillemot is avoided in the link), which is the American name.  What won the tossup for me was that the article discusses an event that occurred exclusively among U.S. companies, and the relatively common argument that articles about the US should US spellings and British (or Australian or whatever) articles should use British spellings.  Tomertalk 16:38, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: AmE vs BrE

message: Unfortunately, there is no Wikipedia article for this term and I can't a definition on the Internet. I presume that it is a government-issued financial warrant, but I am unsure where the "school" part comes in. Can this be made more clear in the article? Thanks, GentlemanGhost (talk) 23:08, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  School warrant
Talk:Jehan Alain

message: * I've rewritten his biography, based upon web research, together with liner notes from Marie-Claire Alain's Erato CD-set (Erato-2202-45402-2 + 2292-45508-2) and Helga Schauerte's Motette CD-set (Motelle CD-11301 + CD-11311).  Alain's and Schauerte's notes do not coincide completely in every detail, and I've tried to keep the text in the middle-of-the-road where they disagree.  I've retranslated the dedication from the Litanies but I'm not sure that I've translated the last line's delicious ambiguity very well.  Suggestions welcome.  Does anybody know if any of Jehan Alain's photos and drawings can be scanned and used here?  Copyright information is difficult to locate.  Next job is to write something useful about some of his works.  Anybody up for that? Robindch 13:11, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: All the allusions and references to Jehan Stefan must be deleted : this guy, who uses a pseudonym, is not a famous musicologist at all. He just wrote a few words on an Internet forum. He is absolutely not notable, his work is recognized by nobody. I will undertake the deletion of his absurdity catalog soon if nobody did it by then. Mutatis mutandis 17:08, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have the AWV catalog to include in their place?  I'm not a musicologist and I'm not in much of a position to judge the issue one way or the other. Robindch 21:48, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately, I'm not a musicologist, I'm just musically interested by Alain's works, and I haven't got the AWV catalog. But using Google, the only thing I'm *really* certain about, is that mentionning the name of Jehan Stefan is out-subject and nonrelevant ; his work was only to spread his catalog all over the Internet thanks to Wikipedia, although it is a complete OR. To finish, in order not to lower him to much, I don't translate you what he wrote here... Mutatis mutandis 12:34, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

text: Your version is by far superior, and I'll go ahead and do it myself, if you're not around (it's already September).  I came to the article wanting to see if it contained details of his death in action, which was a heroic one (reminding me a bit of Albéric Magnard, who probably would have been better off leaving the scene).  Nicolas Slonimsky has an account of it in some detail in his innocently-named Book of Musical Anecdotes.  Antandrus  (talk) 23:24, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

text: I've gone ahead and done it.  I expanded the account of his death a bit, using Slonimsky and the current article in the New Grove (he received the Croix de Guerre for his action). Antandrus  (talk) 00:18, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled