Talk:SunRocket

message: Article has already been through AfD on 02:29, 2 October 2005, result was DELETE. Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/SunRocket Monkeyman 00:24, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy

message: SunRocket is a major VoIP company with $34 million in venture capital, and perhaps 50,000 subscribers.  This current article needs serious help, but I do not think that deleting it is the solution.  At VoIP there are many less well-known companies listed.  Deletions should be pursued systematically, rather than picking on just one company among many.   Jehochman 05:19, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean Up

message: Please don't deface the article with non-NPOV content. The article was deleted once (let's not repeat that). Also, the subscriber base number will be deleted unless a credible source is found. (Cite your figures please!)   Jhessela 04:26, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: Added that SunRocket offers E911 to over 98% of users, DO NOT REMOVE Locust43 23:32, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  E911 

message: I have no idea why the version of the SunRocket article I worked on was deleted.
I got rid of the old talk page because it is no longer relevant.
The revived-again article in its current form is horrible, and will be fixed. Jhessela 18:22, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've restored the old talk so that people who come in to work on this article can easily review the talk history. I am guessing that somebody will notice that this article was already deleted twice, and won't be very amused that it's back from the dead, in worse shape than ever. If you want the article to survive, please add facts, with references.  Use NPOV and document why the company is noteworthy.  I personally feel Sunrocket is worth an article, but unfortunately the two prior articles were AfD'ed. Jehochman (Talk/Contrib) 02:15, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  A new start? 

message: The article is self-admittedly old. Therefore it is no longer relevant for being used as it was."04:46, 29 June 2006 McA...(Reverted. Jhessla, you hardly have a reputable record with Wiki. Please do your research on SR first..."I have a blemish-free Wikipedia record, and believe I am in compliance with all official Wikipedia policies regarding the removal of the DSL Report article link. I have done research on SunRocket, but that isn't relevant.
Please leave the personal insults to yourself next time.Jhessela 02:19, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I linked to the latest reviews of SunRocket on DSLreports instead, which may solve the problem. --John Nagle 23:04, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  DSL Reports article 

message: It's been nominated for speedy, and consensus was to delete it. It's got support from Locust43 , which is about as good as having WillyOnWheels support your article. It's an advert for a non-notable company. 
I've nominated two other VoIP company articles for deletion. PLEASE review WP:CORP and follow it with 
# External links that show notability 
# Expansion of article to show why it needs it's own entry.
Otherwise, G11. --In ur base, killing ur dorfs 16:19, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This article meets "Criteria for companies and corporations" guideline number one. I will add references for some of the information in the article. Jhessela 04:37, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Why is this article still here?

message: This article is not notable. It does not cite any verifiable references and/or sources.
(Pasca 03:00, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This article meets Wikipedia's stated requirements for notability ("Criteria for companies and corporations" guideline number one). Lack of sources is not a criterion for deletion (the article is tagged appropriately). Jhessela 16:36, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speedy Deletion 

message: The only reason the Broadband Reports link is even in the 'External links' section is because it solved an earlier "neutrality" dispute.
User reviews aren't necessary, and the article certainly doesn't need more than than one review site listed. Broadband Reports has been around for a much longer amount of time than your site, has more reviews, covers a wider variety of topics, has name recognition, and is generally respected. Its link stays. Jhessela 05:03, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WhichVOIP.com 

message: The person who nominated the article for speedy deletion is trying to make a WP:POINT because two articles about VoIP services they created were nominated for speedy deletion. If anything, this should be taken to AfD. However, I feel that this article has established notability, and does not appear to be an advertisement to me. --Адам12901 Talk 05:26, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speedy deletion on 28 March 

message: Here's a list of the reasons for my edits / reverts:
1. Your additions to the key_people part of the infobox are superfluous. You are also incorrectly formatting the Wikipedia links.
2. "Coworkers" doesn't need a hyphen.
3. "Ten" doesn't need to be changed to "10".
4. Your text in the products part of the infobox was long-winded and my original text was grammatically incorrect, so I rewrote the section. Jhessela 21:03, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  72.197.209.45 / 12.154.85.131 

message: Technically, couldn't the company be considered defunct? They are no longer taking customers. No phone calls are accepted. All of the phone service is slowly going down (mine still works partially; it is the same for most customers). I would consider the company, as of now, to be defunct. - SnuckOnTE 19:17, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Defunct Company 

message: It is good for Wikipedia to have up to date information about Sunrocket's shutdown. However, this doesn't relieve us of our responsibilities to write in an encyclopedic tone, and to always cite sources. Please do not use this article as an up-to-the-minute place to track rumors and dispense advice. Before I cleaned it up, this article falsely claimed that Sunrocket filed for bankruptcy. A quick fact-check would reveal no sources for this claim. Rhobite 20:07, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rumors and updates 

message: Part of the article states that's unclear as to whether or not service to the customers has been terminated. Being a former customer of this service,I can confirm that service was not cut off but transferred to a company called Teleblend who perpetrated a fraud on thousands of the former Sunrocket customers. If you want the details of the faud I'd be happy to provide them but I'm not sure it's relevant to the article.
Chuckh1958 (talk) 17:18, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confirmation 

message: For an article with this much discussion, it doesn't answer a fundamental question, WHY DID THEY SHUT DOWN? It needs to be addressed.  Family Guy Guy (talk) 02:59, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uninformative article