lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Mġarr United F.C.

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.mgarrutd.com/the-club/history. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.   — CactusWriter (talk) 06:53, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: Hello am David from Nigeria am good footballer.i need a help from your team to join so that my talent can help the team.thank you.here is my gmail.odeledauda4@gmail.com David,odele (talk) 02:21, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Footballer 
Talk:Preservation Foundation of Palm Beach

message: Regarding the question that someone put up the "is it notable" template. I would have to say that what this non-profit organization seems to have done (and please note that I am no part of it) is just as much as similar other organizations. There are Wiki articles about the Newport Restoration Foundation, the Aga Khan Historic Cities Support Programme, the United States Court Tennis Association, and the Berkeley Architectural Heritage Association - as a few examples. There is no question about their notability. On the other hand, Wikipedia has countless articles about fictional comic book characters, as well as obscure video games and songs marketed by commercial enterprises that would all fail any rigorous "notability" thresholds. I trust that other more astute editors will understand why I removed the template from this article. Cheers! — CZmarlin 19:56, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: I place a COI2 tag due to obvious issues. If this is in error, please remove it. Bearian 13:37, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict of interest
Talk:Buffalo Blizzard

message: This list is pretty long.  I don't feel that all of these players are notable.  Many did not have a big impact on the Blizzard or other parts of soccer.  If there are no objections, I will start reducing the list to include only "notable" players. KitHutch 20:03, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable Players?
Talk:Dischidia

message: What is the source of the species names in this list and how thoroughly has it been checked?  At least some--D. livida Elmer, D. diphylla Elmer, & D. apoensis Elmer--are not good names (these names were published without Latin descriptions or diagnoses, thus are not validly published). MrDarwin 20:06, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

message: Hello I am a college student working on an editing project, and I am going to make a few changes to this article regarding the structure and wording/phrasing. I also want to add a photo of a real dischidia. Cupcakehinata (talk) 18:33, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Go for it! Thanks for helping out. Steven Walling • talk 21:00, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Structuring
Talk:Area codes 317 and 463

message: Is there any chance that the code "317" was chosen because that was the number of soldiers who survived the torpedoing of the USS Indianapolis in WWII?
Yes that is exactly why. Well done!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.108.185.200 (talk) 15:45, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Jungle Book (1989 TV series)

message: I have seen both this and the Disney version of Jungle Book. This one is by far the much better of the two adaptations. This anime version of The Jungle Book depicts Mowgli's adventures in a much grittier and graver fashion, which clearly shows the struggle of Mowgli the man-cub as he learns to grow and become strong. I remember getting quite scared watching this at the age of 5.
It would be a shame to let such a great series vanish out of existence. Does anyone know where and how Jungle Book Shonen can be obtained? --Waterchan 01:32, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I, too, found the series to be quite intense, having watched it at an early age. Twipley (talk) 16:29, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

text: I've heard that some Italian versions (Il Libro Della Giungla) are circulating on eMule. Not that I would ever advocate illegal file sharing, of course... :-|  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lee M (talk • contribs) 11:19, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course, the Japanese version should be preferable over any other ones, for various reasons. The only issue being, the "play-asia" link not mentioning any subtitle presence altogether... Twipley (talk) 16:27, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Excellent series, but where to obtain?

message: Well I've found months ago, but be prepared to shell out some good amount of cash.
http://www.play-asia.com/paOS-13-71-a7-49-en-70-q5u.html
http://www.play-asia.com/paOS-13-71-a7-70-tcl.html
I couldn't even find a single episode off the internet for download. I only got Episode 49 from a friend who owns the whole series on VHS and DVD on multiple languages. I had to bug him for that episode, since I missed that on local TV (I regret doing so!).
:I've heard that some Italian versions (Il Libro Della Giungla) are circulating on eMule. Not that I would ever advocate illegal file sharing, of course... :-|  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lee M (talk • contribs) 11:19, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course, the Japanese version should be preferable over any other ones, for various reasons. The only issue being, the "play-asia" link not mentioning any subtitle presence altogether... Twipley (talk) 16:27, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Found them
Category talk:Jews by occupation

message: I was very surprised to see that this category lacked a category of "Jewish medical practitioners" and even more surprised that "Jewish psychologists" was not here (Abraham Maslow, Sigmund Freud, Alfred Adler, Melanie Klein, Victor Frankl and many others could start what could turn out to be quite a packed category...)ACEOREVIVED (talk) 23:00, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What the heck does the stuff like "2 C, 225 P" next to every subcat mean? If it's that unclear to our editors and readers, please remove these abbreviations. Badagnani (talk) 15:40, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: C = categories; P = pages. It would mean the category contains 2 (sub)categories and 225 pages. Good Ol’factory (talk) 00:13, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "2 C, 225 P"
Template talk:Ont Uni

message: Removed Ryerson, it's a polytechnic institute - look it up. It has limited authority to grant degrees but this does not make it a university, and hence it should NOT be on this template. Ryerson should be on the Ontario Colleges template, not the University template.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.42.104.147 (talk) 19:16, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You're wrong, and I've re-added it. J 17:21, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Very wrong, Ryerson has had full authority to grant degree's for almost 20 years.. get with the times pal  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.132.12.80 (talk) 20:22, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: See here:  I think this should be the source as to what declares a University to be a University... I don't believe any private universities in Ontario are actual universities...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.132.12.81 (talk) 13:01, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Ryerson
Talk:Alereon

message: The speedy deletion of this page is contested. The content of the original post was drastically modified to include only a generic description of the company and it's office locations.Alereon-tx 20:18, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Jayne Wisener

message: As she has a big role in an upcoming Tim Burton film, I think she qualifies as notable, even if no one knows who she is at the moment. -- User:flyingdics 16:21 1 August 2007
Agreed, she's a lead in a major Hollywood film--definitely qualifies as notable. She's already received multiple mentions in theatre and film magazines. I've gone ahead and removed the notability note. Dbarefoot 11:43, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 
Talk:Under the Jolly Roger

message: this book also one of my favs but but by the name of the title i expected there to be more action! but hey i can't complane the book was awsome and so were the ones before it and also afther it! this book was cute and advent]erious just like the following ones and sets the plot line!!! loved it! :-) ~ Anne G. (Moocow22)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.71.101.20 (talk) 15:49, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  adventurious!
Talk:In the Belly of the Bloodhound

message: ok... if you have not read this book yet then i highley sugest it this tale of friendship and strength really keeps the book going!!! towards the end of the book something happens which i wount tell you but some one dies and it was so sad i was crying throwgh the whole chapter!!!:-( although this book is a little discosting with nuditey and "Millers" the book was excithing and als  a riprouring abventure with Jacky Faber! :-) ~ Anne G. (Moocow22)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.71.101.20 (talk) 15:39, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  i loved this book!
Talk:Interquartile mean

message: Might one consider this the compliment of the midhinge? --Belg4mit 20:31, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comparison

message: Quote: In calculation of the IQM, only the interquartile range is used, and the lowest 25% and the highest 25% of the scores are discarded. These points are called the first and third quartiles.  Why are they not called the first and fourth quartiles?  There are two quartiles in between. Biscuittin (talk) 19:55, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question
Talk:Strong coloring

message: Someone who knows the specific papers should put the cited results due to Penny Haxell in the references section.  Adking80 20:35, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Haxell's references

message: In 
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012365X96003007?via%3Dihub
R. Yuster showed an example for graphs with degree Δ and and partitions of size 2Δ - 1 where there is no strong coloring with respect to this partition. He actually showed that with this partition there is not even one possible color. The accepted conjecture is that any graph is 2Δ strong colorable. Aharoni, Berger and Ziv proved that any chordal graph is 2Δ+1 strong colorable.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.176.86.190 (talk) 19:21, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Strong Coloring Conjecture
Template talk:Danish elections

message: I originally changed the template to say referendums rather than referenda. This was altered, and I have no reverted back to using referendums. My reasoning is that the name of the category the referendums/-da is :Category:Referendums in Denmark. This is consistent with referendum categories for other countries. Therefore, though I personally prefer referenda as a word over referendums, I think we should be consistent and use referendums in the template as well. After all, both forms are equally correct according to Merriam-Webster: . Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • &site=  count) 20:37, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Referendums or referenda
Talk:Itv.com

message: Please note that at the moment their is no longer a Weather or Shop on itv.com, however in the future they may be added again, but at the moment their is not. This is Drew 17:32, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: At www.itv.com/weather, it clearly states the site will be up and running soon, and there is an ITV Shop: www.itvsuperstore.com, but www.itv.com/shop doesn't redirect to it at the moment.GMctalk 20:52, 04 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Weather & ITV Shop

message: I notice my inclusion of the new ITV TV Guide was revetred. I put it here because ITV is a television provider and thus it feels entirely appropriate, SqueakBox 20:37, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: TV Guide

message: Please justify your reversion of ref'd & notable material here or it will be reverted. An edit summary directing me to my talk page is insufficient. Thanks, ♫ SqueakBox talk contribs 17:37, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: You work for TVGenius, so please stop sprinkling Wikipedia with name-drops to the organization. That is editing with a promotional bent. ThemFromSpace 07:40, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Reverting ref'd material

message: ITV Mobile was proposed for deletion, but I  have changed that to prose a merge into this article. Although the PROD had as part of its reason "reads like an advert", to me it reads fairly neutrally, though it could be better sourced, especially its history. Si Trew (talk) 18:22, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge
Talk:Tataviam

message: I'm disputing this implication based on the existence of primary sources like http://www.tataviam-nsn.us/.
KylieMBrooks (talk) 13:11, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The contemporary Fernandeño-Tataviam tribe in Los Angeles county is primarily Fernandeño.  The Tataviam ceased to exist as a separate, identifiable group in the first half of the 20th century.  Even then, virtually all Tataviam were intermarrying with Fernandeño and other Indians (and Europeans).  The only reliable linguistic records of the Tataviam language in the early 20th century were from people who only remembered a few words and phrases from their youth--they were already heavily intermarried at that time.  The use of the name "Tataviam" in the tribal name has more to do with making a claim to tribal ownership of the Santa Clarita valley (the only region of historic Tataviam occupation) in addition to the San Fernando valley.  The "Tataviam language" samples posted on the tribal website are Fernandeño, not Tataviam.  --Taivo (talk) 22:40, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page implies this Indigenous nation does not exist - false
Talk:WWGK

message: Unlike "ESPN Cleveland", the identifier of "ESPN 1520 KNR2" is unique to WWGK.  Compare to WTAM/Cleveland.  While branded "Newsradio WTAM 1100", that station also refers to itself as "The Big One"; think of a station's branding as analogous to an individual station's name.  "ESPN Cleveland" does not refer to a single station, but rather a pair of sister stations in the same radio market (one could argue that "ESPN Cleveland" refers to the whole of Good Karma Cleveland properties, including espncleveland.com and beyond).  Let's not make things any more complicated than they need to be.   Levdr1lp  (talk) 01:22, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Branding
Talk:Fire Pro Wrestling Returns

message: Where did the November 27th release date come from? I don't see anything on the IGN article mentioning a set in stone date. Th 2005 11:45, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not in the article itself but rather listed under the game info to the right. --  12:15, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

text: Must've missed that, cheers! Th 2005 12:47, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

message: The Great Muta
Tiger Mask (Any that are in game, with there changed names)
much apreciated if i get help.Gamemaster1026 (talk) 21:52, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I know The Great Muta and Tiger Mask IV (and I believe Tiger Mask III) are included, though I don't recall their fictional names. Jeff Silvers (talk) 07:31, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Check fireproclub.com for their 'FPW' names or to download the corrected roster. For someone who fancies himself a 'Game Master'...eh, nevermind. --EndlessDan 17:09, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are the folowing wrestlers in this, and what are there changed names? 

message: When is this game being released in Europe and the UK?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.46.141.127 (talk) 00:53, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As far as I know, the PAL version of FPWR is coming out around early February of next year (it has been confirmed that Australia will get it on 2/13/2008, but I'm unsure about the Europeans; more info here:  ). COOLRUNNER87 (talk) 05:03, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  EUROPEAN RELEASE DATE 

message: This article is written like someone was describing it to a friend. For example, "You" and "I" should never be used unless it's in a quote from someone. Basically everything after the Character customization section needs to be rewritten. TJ Spyke 18:15, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup
Talk:Brenzett

message: Up until the mid to late 80s the Garage in Brenzett was a classic Rolls Royce garage. A beautiful old filling station with classic car sales from a bygone era. 2A00:23C8:3C89:E401:33:7B67:5F68:6254 (talk) 18:06, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rolls Royce garage
Talk:Pascal Charbonneau

message: The comment that he lost his first round game to Dreev contradicts what Hoffman wrote in "Kings Gambit". There it says he lost to Ettienne Bacrot.
Also the book says PC is now married to Irina Krush.
     --Bob Solovay  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.189.22.28 (talk) 21:19, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Grasshopper (chess)

message: The main article for Fairy Chess Pieces listed the "nightrider" as the most popular fairy chess piece, while this article claimed that destination to go to it's subject, the "grasshopper."  I have changed both references to "one of the most popular," and suggest that in the future anybody who wishes to claim a certain piece as being the most popular cite their facts accordingly.  Rudy Breteler (talk) 21:37, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, this can be checked and backed by facts quite easily. The database of chess problems, WinChloe, has as a part probably the largest database of fairy chess problems. It is possible to filter out problems featuring any fairy piece and count them. Based on my experience, grasshopper and nightrider are by far the most frequent (i.e. popular) fairy pieces... I can do this count later, with database at hand. --Ruziklan (talk) 10:46, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Most Popular 

message: Fairy chess piece has low importance, yet this Grasshopper (a sub-element of Fairy Chess Piece) has mid importance. This makes little sense. 89.76.218.139 (talk) 12:00, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: True. I have changed the importance to Low. SyG (talk) 18:10, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The importance must be fixed 

message: Under Betza notation, the grasshopper is a pQ, notation (pQ). Double sharp (talk) 13:25, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops. That should be gQ, notation (gQ). A pQ would be similar, but would not need to jump to the square just after the hurdle, so with pQ at h8 and a piece at d4, (pQ)c3, (pQ)b2, and (pQ)a1 are all legal (and are its only legal moves). Double sharp (talk) 07:26, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Betza notation 

message: What's the value of grasshopper? 2A01:119F:251:9000:3044:5AA8:3B70:D88 (talk) 07:26, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Value 

message: Here and elsewhere, the cute icons ... They aren't "typical" unless you can find a source which says as much. (Can you even find one example in a chess variants publication where these have been used?) Also placement as lead image does not match the importance or value of the images. (In fact I don't think they belong in any article. Even the mann icons worked on recently. Where did these come from? Never seen them in any chess variant literature.) --IHTS (talk) 15:29, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cute icons 

message: I think the problem is supposed to start with "White to move" and should say "White mates in 8".
--2A02:908:4B11:8820:6D4B:ED56:C487:906C (talk) 03:53, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Example problem
Talk:And Now in Colour

message: "Footlights? That'll do nicely!" comedy at its worst.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.98.144.27 (talk) 21:42, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  God this show was dire 
Talk:Yoroi-dōshi

message: This isn't called a yoroi tōshi in Japanese.  It's called a yoroidōshi, as mentioned even in the body of the article.  Would someone be kind enough to move this?  -- Eiríkr Útlendi │ Tala við mig 23:48, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: PS -- I'm doing some copy-edit to fix spellings, etc.  -- Eiríkr Útlendi │ Tala við mig 23:49, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong title 
Talk:Broadley's flat lizard

message: Could this article receive a rating please? Shrewpelt 17:47, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rating

message: For international users, there is no reference to which country the toponyms fired out in the first few sentences of the article are referring to. One needs to scroll down to the categories to see that this animal is from South Africa.--Paffka 09:16, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  South Africa 
Talk:Parliament House, Canberra/148463410FGANComments

message: This article failed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of August 1, 2007, compares against the  six good article criteria:
:1. Well written?: Yes, the prose is nice and readable.  It manages to give a non-dull presentation of a building.  I really enjoyed the article.
:2. Factually accurate?: No, This is the main reason for failure.  There are no sources.  An article cannot be a good article without sources.  Furthermore, I believe sources should be readily available.  Some of the comments on the history part especially describe peoples opinions and these places should be sourced.  I will go through and tag facts I think need sources.
:3. Broad in coverage?: No, Thorough enough for a good article.  I think the history section is plenty thorough.  The description of the building is good.  I believe the article has room for some more information about modern building design and use.
:4. Neutral point of view?: Yes
:5. Article stability? Yes.  Although this article seems to be subject to a lot of vandalism, including recently some date changing vandalism which reinforces the need for sources.
:6. Images?: Yes. The images are extraordinary.  They're are enough and they are high quality and all seem to have proper licensing.  I would say the images are great for GA and possible even enough for FA.  I read the explanation for the impossibility of an aerial photo and that is regrettable.  Could you maybe contact government authorities and describe your need to see if they'll release a photo or point you in some direction?
When these issues are addressed, the article can be resubmitted for consideration.  If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to a GA review.  Thank you for your work so far. 
— Weston.pace 21:17, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Failed "good article" nomination