lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Flagg, Derbyshire

message: Hasn't the Plough closed now ?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.152.41.145 (talk) 23:29, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved   (t · c) buidhe 09:36, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 13 December 2020
Talk:The Great Book of Irish Genealogies

message: While Ó Muraíle's edition is obviously an edition of great scholarly importance, I think the information here should be merged with the article on Leabhar na nGenealach. This page could remain as a redirect to that page, since many people refer to the text by the English title. Let me know what you think! ANB (talk) 21:08, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: A merge seems sensible.  I don't mind in which direction --Rumping (talk) 11:55, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It would make more sense alright to have it merged. Jaqian (talk) 12:27, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed Merger
Talk:Paul Walsh (priest)

message: Would it not be better to put Walsh/Breathnach under the title 'Paul Walsh(Irish scholar)' or 'Paul Walsh(scholar)', as it is his scholarship rather than his pastoral duties for which he is widely known?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.77.86.100 (talk) 16:26, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Article title
Talk:First Class (game show)

message: Several nostalgia sites state that First Class was originally presented by a Louise Bachelor, but in the BBC Quiz Book the foreword by Debbie Greenwood reads:
"It really has been tremendous fun recording the first three series of First Class at the BBC in Glasgow"
This would suggest that Greenwood presented the show from the start, so I have removed references to Bachelor. Does anyone have any more information?
Danny Darko 19:16, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who is Louise Bachelor?
Talk:Ker–Frisbie doctrine

message: This logic is not controversial, recent, or particular to the United States. Israel made the exact same determination in 1961 over the abduction of Adolf Eichmann to Israeli soil. A person in a country is subject to the laws of that country, even if they were abducted and sent there against their will. Such people do not have immunity from prosecution. That is a jurisprudential fact in any country whose legal system derives from the Roman/English legal paradigm. Which is over half the planet. This logic does not legitimize the initial abduction, which can still be pursued as a crime in the country where it happened. However, the fact of the abduction cannot be used to declare a mistrial in the country of destination. --76.217.81.152 19:21, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:2002 Dudley earthquake

message: It seems there is a little uncertainty about the actual magnitude of this event. A lot of sources (including BBC  and USGS) say it was 5.0 on the Richter scale, this is because the BGS revised the magnitude a month later from the initial 4.8. However, the BGS have since revised the magnitude to 4.7  and other sources have failed to update their records, so it is known to many as being magnitude 5.0 (or 4.8). Considering the BGS was the main source of information to the BBC in the first place, i think 4.7ML is correct and should be used in the article. RapidR (talk) 10:29, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Without going into sources, 4.7 sounds about right and is probably generally-accepted. I was around 12 miles away from Rowley Regis when this hit. My girlfriend called to tell me that her bed just moved my entire house must've shifted some as well.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mere Mortal (talk • contribs) 00:01, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Magnitude
Talk:Mass deacidification

message: The earlier article on mass deacidification that I edited included a reference to something called the Interleaf Vapor Phase Process which has a passing reference in Henk J, Porck's introduction http://www.knaw.nl/ecpa/PUBL/porck2.htm. I cannot find any information on the manufacturer or the possible effects of this process. I would love any help in finding. 
The article desperately needs some links to newer research on mass deacidification. Lizzy Jasper 19:40, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

message: I wonder if the cost of digitizing a book with semi automatic page turning scanners can be even close to any chemical process.
It wood be good to have a comparison with what Google budgets for book scanning.
Idyllic press (talk) 23:46, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current digitizing costs? 
Talk:David Dodd Lee

message: Created a Talk Page.ReadQT 19:49, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mint imperial

message: "This article or other page provides no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. It is patent nonsense (CSD G1)."
I cannot really fathom how whoever added said notice came to that conclusion. It's perfectly salvagable, and it's insulting for it to be called "patent nonsense". Redrocketboy 19:50, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have Wikifiked the article, because in the frist vision, the article is more like a "nosense" than a correct article.  Brunoy Anastasiya Seryozhenko Messengers 19:56, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikifying is helpful, but I'm still unsure how it was "nonsense" (or "nosense")? Nonsense is something like "fghfghfghffgh" Redrocketboy 19:58, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems like Theresa knott redirected it. Redrocketboy 19:59, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:TheV0id

message: Don't Speedy Delete
Well, as soon as this page was created, as it had no links, it was hit with a template for speedy deletion.  I've added some links.  I will add citations soon.  The article is definitely noteworthy, as it deals with the subject of the largest online poker prize AND the largest poker cheating incident documented, which amounted to over $1.3 million dollars.  A cheat that big, and a tournament that big, certainly deserve to be documented and noted here.zadignose 19:50, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Bibliotheca Teubneriana

message: Isn't the Corpus Christianorum a comparable publishing venture? Adam Bishop (talk) 21:21, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comparable?

message: An editor has removed the images illustrating the series' typographic design and its history three times (isn't that a problem vis-a-vis WP:3RR? The most recent and specific edit summary cites "WP:NFCC #1,3,8." However, these are precisely the non-free content criteria that apply to the images you are insisting on removing. The images have (1) no free equivalent, (3) are minimal in number and extent, and (8) are important to readers' understanding of the topic. If there is any disagreement about the applicability of these three subjective criteria, let's discuss it here, specifically and at length, and with informed reference to the article's subject matter. I believe I'm applying these criteria in good faith and don't understand why I'm getting block threats on my user talk page. Wareh (talk) 15:38, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-free fair-use rationale for typographic illustration images
Talk:Drive Lock Assembly

message: This page is an experiment. It is my first Wikipedia page, hopefully the first of many. I am fascinated with things about outer space, so I thought perhaps I'd create a series of articles about space things that seem under-wikified to me, create a home for them, amass knowledge, pictures, diagrams, etc. Leofric1 20:06, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: An Experiment
Talk:Rediffusion Television

message: Is this right?  According to the 405 line article, Rediffusion Television was using the 405 line video standard, which was never capable of color.  Algr (talk) 16:35, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The content at the time was colour?
Talk:Engine swap

message: I've built a 1974 Super Beetle that had a 911 horizontally opposed flat 6 transplanted in the back, I got a kit that did the complete conversion.  This article is clearly wrong.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.139.153.28 (talk) 16:11, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  VW/Porsche myth 

message: 8m trying to desperately fond out if I can swap a 2006 3.8 Pontiac motor for my 2002 3.8 Chevy motor 172.58.27.47 (talk) 02:42, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Engine swap
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Rallyinspired

message: User:Rallyinspired
    run at Sun Dec 2 20:15:06 2007 GMT
Mainspace              11
Template talk:         1
User talk:             2
User:                  17
Wikipedia talk:        1
Wikipedia:             7
avg edits per page     2.17
earliest               15:14, 6 October 2007
number of unique pages 18
total                  39
2007/10  32
2007/11  3
2007/12  4
(green denotes edits with an edit summary (even an automatic one), red denotes
edits without an edit summary)
        Mainspace
2 Chrysler ME Four Twelve
        User:
15 Rallyinspired
2  Rallyinspired/News
   User talk:
2 Stormtracker94
              Wikipedia:
3 Requests for adminship/Rallyinspired
3 Wikiproject Green
If there were any problems, please email Interiot or post at User talk:Interiot
.
Based directly on these URLs: [1]
* The edit count was retrieved from this link at 20:15, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit count for Rallyinspired
Talk:Allen Buchanan

message: ==What to Include== MaynardClark (talk) 17:46, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

message: Links to Allen D. Buchanan are found on the Internet, but they are not yet redirected to this page.  That should be accomplished (speedily).
MaynardClark (talk) 17:46, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect

message: This entry is short of sources, and more details are needed about his philosophical work.  I hope others will contribute.Philosophy Junkie (talk) 22:01, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources, details needed
Talk:San Antonio

message: There's certainly more significant events about COVID-19 (earliest quarantine city, etc) that may be worth a mention, but mask policy is not significant.   The Alamodome Dirt controversy and the Applewhite Reservoir controversy are more worthy of discussion about San Antonio's specific history than a graf about mask policy which is of global concern.  There is not even a novelty about the policy specific to San Antonio that's not implemented elsewhere nor anything precedent-setting.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.33.177.210 (talk) 14:24, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is there a section about COVID-19 mask mandates in this article? 

message: We all know that average daily highs in July are no longer 95F.  It is disinformation to keep that chart in its current state. 2600:1700:EB0:7A20:71AF:FBB1:8A16:29FB (talk) 14:33, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Climate data is out of date 

message: I think we should highlight somehow, the city has a very short winter. And most days throughout February and March has a daytime temperature above 22.
kind of bordering a tropical climate. דולב חולב (talk) 06:18, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The January daily mean is 7 degrees below the border with tropical climate. And for Dec/Feb it 6 degrees away. Nighttime temperatures are below 10(50) for several days. It can’t border tropical climate. Brownsville in south Texas does border.PAper GOL (talk) 06:32, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Climate
Talk:Tschaikovsky Pas de Deux

message: How should the name of the composer of the music for “Serenade” be spelled? Most Westerners now spell it Tchaikovsky, but City Ballet took up, during Balanchine’s lifetime, the spelling Tschaikovsky. Why? Because that’s how the composer spelled it when he was in New York in 1891. (My thanks to the reader who sent me a copy of his Carnegie Hall autograph from the Pierpont Morgan Library.) 
:NY Times article by Alastair Macaulay, June 1, 2007
=== See also === 
* Official website Carnegie Hall
::— Robert Greer (talk) 20:51, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems strange that this article uses the spelling Tschaikovsky when the WP article on the composer himself uses the spelling Tchaikovsky.  There was (is?) a discussion on that article about the spelling Tchai... or Chai... but no mention of the spelling Tschai....  I've copied this comment to both articles.
* There are at least two different spellings of the composer's name(s) in current use on WP. I believe we ought to establish only one spelling and use it across WP. The lack of one is chiefly because discussions have not been focused in one place.  The controversy has been included - and to some extent resolved - independently on the discussion pages for at least two articles, with each spelling supported by valid arguments.   It seems best to continue the discussion and resolve the controversy in only one place, and that should be the discussion page for the composer himself, so I'll refer future comments to Talk:Pyotr_Ilyich_Tchaikovsky#Spelling of "Tchaikovsky" and ask you to make them there, please. Twistlethrop (talk) 14:59, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tschaikovsky vs. Tchaikovsky 

message: * Official website Carnegie Hall
::— Robert Greer (talk) 20:51, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems strange that this article uses the spelling Tschaikovsky when the WP article on the composer himself uses the spelling Tchaikovsky.  There was (is?) a discussion on that article about the spelling Tchai... or Chai... but no mention of the spelling Tschai....  I've copied this comment to both articles.
* There are at least two different spellings of the composer's name(s) in current use on WP. I believe we ought to establish only one spelling and use it across WP. The lack of one is chiefly because discussions have not been focused in one place.  The controversy has been included - and to some extent resolved - independently on the discussion pages for at least two articles, with each spelling supported by valid arguments.   It seems best to continue the discussion and resolve the controversy in only one place, and that should be the discussion page for the composer himself, so I'll refer future comments to Talk:Pyotr_Ilyich_Tchaikovsky#Spelling of "Tchaikovsky" and ask you to make them there, please. Twistlethrop (talk) 14:59, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  See also 

message: This section is full of personal comments and appreciations. It certainly shouldn’t be canned just for that, but needs to be seriously edited. 89.159.110.175 (talk) 06:52, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV: Notable performers
Template talk:Bursa Malaysia

message: As this is my first ever template in Wikipedia, I try to plan properly before creating it. Therefore, I discussed this matter in WikiProject Malaysia.
Still, I believe the best and relevant place to discuss this matter is here. I have a few doubts about this template that I hope will be solved.
# Currently, the external link to check the stock info is The Star Online. There is also another source of this info through Yahoo! Finance. The example for the latter is as follows: (MYX: 1818). Which external link do you prefer? (I prefer Yahoo!)
# Stock quotes in MYX are "officially" in 4-digit numbers. However there are some who prefer the alphabet form. Should I create another variable in this template for this? If available, the alphabetical form will replace numerical, but the link remains the same.
The reason I can't make the external link to the official Bursa site is because it doesn't support this kind of linking. So it's not an option. Also, the reason for not using the term KLSE, KUL, BURSA etc is because MYX is the official term and should precede the rest.
I appreciate your suggestions and comments on this template to improve it. Hytar 18:40, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Any feedback welcomed
Talk:Midland Revolt

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 16:53, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: It is interesting to note that 1607 was the year of Shakespeare's Coriolanus, which includes a food riot.
86.220.37.202 (talk) 08:41, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coriolanus
Talk:Walled City of Lahore

message: Not within the scope of WP Mil Hist just because it has walls.Cromdog (talk) 16:34, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Todd May

message: Hi. Todd May here. One small comment about the biography. I am referred to as helping to develop the program of "postanarchism." That is actually not a term I use, and it has come to signify something like "after anarchism." My own views are actually a melding of poststructuralism and anarchism, with no particular "post" part. This is a small point, and no one should go to great trouble to change it, but I have noticed that I'm getting referred to in other literature as among a group of postanarchists that I don't believe I belong in. Thanks.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Todd May Philosophy (talk • contribs) 
:Welcome, Todd, and thanks very much for taking the time to comment here. In essence, Wikipedia is a tertiary reference work, drawing entirely from existing literature, and as such is not well-positioned to right any wrongs. So, while for example our post-anarchism article makes clear the distinction between a post-structuralist form of anarchism and an "after anarchism", we can't ourselves contradict those sources you mention which identify you with the other postanarchists, as we are – by and large – amateurs unqualified to pass such judgements. Indeed, you have associated yourself or been associated without contradiction with Hakim Bey, Lewis Call, and Saul Newman in this interview, which makes characterising your position as distinct in this respect from theirs problematic. What we can do is report a disagreement in the literature, so if there is somewhere you have distanced yourself from that milieu in print or online, by all means point it out for us and we can integrate it into the relevant articles. In the meantime, I will try to clarify the characterisation in your biography. Please don't hestitate to comment if there are any other issues, problems or suggestions you might have with or for Wikipedia's coverage of yourself or anarchism in general. Regards, Skomorokh 16:08, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: Do we have enough sources to do justice to this topic? May has some coverage in Antliff's SubStance article, but otherwise has he received any significant coverage? The Political Philosophy of Poststructuralist Anarchism was reviewed in Ethics (philosopher journal) and Choice (very brief listings for librarian purchase recommendations), and his other books did not receive many major reviews, nevertheless with enough material for us to write about his career. Please pass along any sources czar 04:29, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Committee of Sixty

message: …Reference with the DeLancey Family, as of the wife married to Governor Cadwalader Colden, and James DeLancey whom assisted the creation of the committee of sixty. Are these DeLancey Family Members in charge with the Different Congress's of their time. And in a continuance held them through out the Revolutions of America. I shall continue with this formality of DeLancey in regards with Art Economics History and the DeLancey History Files, to search and research as to create a reference towards the causes of this junction, in consideration. And also with an adoption of any DeLancey course to be affiliated with any Congress reference, through the establishments of this reference in accordance with the research and basics of David George DeLancey Art Economics HistoryDavid George DeLancey (talk) 03:08, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:Miscellany for deletion/User:Prester John (2nd nomination)

message: It is totally acceptable within the rules to restore the correct time flow of the posts as well as correct indentation. In this case, a couple of user have – by mistake – indented their posts wrongly and posted a new post before an old post. I have simply corrected that. --Law Lord 20:56, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Acceptable edits
Talk:Iljinhoe

message: : The number of party members was about 800,000 - Given source is old type japanese language. no one can read given source. from a commonsense point of view, number of 800,000  Still not open to conviction. 
: also can't find other English & korean language source. Juice8093 20:58, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't eliminate citations. Seems to be vandalism. Non-English sources are OK. See WP:RSUE. Also, I added a bit of footnote to clarify. --Im mungk (talk) 04:25, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  There is a verifiable and reliable record that shows the number of Iljinhoe members were 90,000, by Japanese colonial government. See the article. Hkwon (talk) 15:08, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccuracy on the numbers of party members 

message: I think someone got the hanja wrong. It has to be 一進会, not 日進会. 800.000 up to 1 million members is what the Kokuryukai claims about the Iljinhoe in its "Secret History of the Japanese Annexion of Korea" at one point. I don't think this source should be trusted implicitly. --87.77.211.136 (talk) 15:01, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hanja
Talk:Ashby de la Zouch Castle

message: I just wanted to say I like what's been/being done to the article. It's great to see references being added and the range of high-quality  photographs really gives a good impression of Ashby. Nev1 (talk) 21:30, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: You are most welcome! Hopefully Kirby Muxloe Castle and some others will get the same treatment soon! Pahazzard (talk) 20:18, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent edits

message: The Hastings family suffered financially as a result of the war, and Ferdinando was imprisoned for debt in 1659.[37]
This came out of an update I've just finished on the 7th Earl; its my week for minor late 17th century politicians :) but Ferdinando died in 1656; maybe 1649?
Nice article.
Robinvp11 (talk) 13:01, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks Robin! Will cross-check with the source. Hchc2009 (talk) 18:07, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Checked and fixed; I'd mistyped. Nicely spotted! Hchc2009 (talk) 18:19, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Small correction
Talk:Artist's statement

message: 'Attribution theory predicts that if a person is told long enough that they are unable to interpret or perceive art that they will begin to believe and agree. '
no idea how to work this in properly into negative aspects --Meika (talk) 05:06, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: attribution theory=

message: This section is a good addition, but please refrain from original research.  (I know the whole stub is uncited, but it's one thing to give uncited general information about what the statement is; an original critique of the article subject does not belong in the encyclopedia. FWIW I agree that the artist's statement probably does more harm than good, artistically. Cyrusc 21:07, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: negative aspects section

message: What is the contemporary expected viewpoint for an artist's statement to be written?--24.187.77.211 (talk) 16:35, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  1st or 3rd person perspective