lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ocelot

message: Include Minecraft in the article. The ocelot is one of the mobs in that game! 174.24.104.56 (talk) 03:29, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: That doesn't seem a sufficiently notable fact about ocelots as a species for it to be included at this page, although it may well be suitable for the Minecraft article if it's a really notable fact about the game. Which it may or may not be; I don't know, but I'd suggest that that would be a better place to ask. Anaxial (talk) 06:45, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minecraft 

message: In the article, the ocelot described by Pucheran as the type specimen for Felis albescens is attributed to the locality "Brownsville, Texas," citing the source "Pucheran, J. (1855). "Description du chat bai et du chat albescent; et remarques sur les caractères et sur la distribution géographique de plusieurs autre chats (Description of bay cat and albescent cat; and remarks on the characters and the geographic distribution of several other cats)". In Geoffroy St.-Hilaire, I. (ed.). Voyage autour du Monde sur la Frégate la Vénus commandée par Abel du Petit-Thouars. Zoologie. Mammifères [Travel around the World on the Frigate Venus commanded by Abel du Petit-Thouars. Zoology. Mammals] (in French). Paris: G & J. Baudry. pp. 137–155." 
Nonetheless, this source directly attributes the specimen to Arkansas (page 149). Though "Arkansas" may refer to a broader area than currently encompassed by the modern U.S. state, this location could by no means be confused with Brownsville, Texas. This record is obviously of a northern specimen and representative of a key extirpated population far in the north of the species' historic range. This error should be corrected and the record should receive proper analysis and representation in the literature surrounding the species. Kowalske (talk) 02:38, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misattribution of Pucheran specimen 

message: There are less than 120 ocelot in Eastern Texas. There is a move to translocate some Mexican ocelot to renew the USA group. There is a political roadblock but the landowners support it. 108.7.229.85 (talk) 01:21, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: If you have a reliable and independent source with this information, please proceed to update the article, or post a request here with the source and what text you'd like added or changed. - UtherSRG (talk) 19:25, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ocelot in the United States of America  

message: There needs to be a sources for coyotes preying on wildcats similar in size of it. I doubt a coyote would go after an ocelot. 47.197.29.147 (talk) 00:49, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ocelot predators.
Talk:United States Secretary of the Air Force

message: Peter Geren is now the Acting Secretary
Shouldn't this be "Secretary of the United States Air Force" or just "Secretary of the Air Force"? Paul 03:07, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: His title is "Secretary of the Air Force" , but since wikipedia is not limited to the United States, I think, that for clarification, "United States" should be part of the article.  Perhaps "Secretary of the United States Air Force" might be better. --rogerd 04:47, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Since the Secertary of the Air Force falls under the Secretary of Defense, the former directly serves the latter.  Thus should we list the Secretary of Defense at the time under "Served under" rather than the President?  The military revovles around reporting to your direct superior, even though the President is more widely known and of course the Commander in Chief. Minutiaman 22:43, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Why not "Administration(s) served under" instead?RicJac (talk) 20:19, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Served under" categorization 

message: Please see Talk:United States Air Force if you are interested in this matter - whether there should be two articles or one.  -- John Broughton   (♫♫) 02:29, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the USAF and the Department of Air Force the same? 

message: This sentence:
"The Secretary of the Air Force is appointed from civilian life by the President"
may be misconstrued as the appointment is for life. I'm pretty sure this is not the case, thus it should be clarified. I don't know enough about the topic to make the changes, though. GregCovey (talk) 19:33, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification needed 

message: Wilson will start sometime after May 10, 2017. She steps down effective May 10, 2017 from South Dakota Mines. Please don't change until then. Corkythehornetfan (ping me) 21:23, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heather Wilson
Talk:Norristown High Speed Line

message: On the route map on the right sidebar--but not the table of stations in the article--"County Line" links to the wrong County Line Station.  Specifically, it links to the defunct SEPTA Regional Rail station of that name, rather than County Line (SEPTA NHSL station).  I don't know how to edit the map, but if someone does, they should fix this.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.252.6.166 (talk) 09:21, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed Amphipolis (talk) 17:02, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Oppose.  While there is significant overlap in the two topics, there are enough distinctions to keep the articles separate, most notably the Strafford Branch of the P&W, which would be inappropriate to only include on the NHSL page.  To emphasize the historical link, have a see also link to the P&W at the beginning of the History section of the NHSL article.  --CComMack 19:53, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The Strafford Branch is the only difference between the original system and the NHSL. Otherwise it was just a continuous process of change, with a name change along the way. --SPUI (talk) 13:00, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested merge with P&W

message: While the line resembles a rapid transit line, it is legally an interurban railroad under the jurisdiction of the FRA.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.5.122.1 (talk) 20:45, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  FRA Railroad Status
Talk:Harpers Bizarre

message: Thanks for cleaning up the false starts I had on this page.  I'm still new at all this!  Having the "Harper's Bizarre" point here as well seems like a good idea, given that I got messed up on the spelling when I was still writing it.
--Wencer 19:56, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent Edits 

message: The article states: "...and the band broke up after their last album was released in 1969."  I own an LP by Harpers Bizarre on the Forest Bay Company label called "As Time Goes By," issued in 1976.  Petersen, Scoppettone, Yount and James all appaer on the album, with only Templemann absent.  The tracks are: "Introduction/Cowboy" (G. Smith);  "As Time Goes By" (Herman Hupfeld);  "Down At Papa Joe's" (J. Smith);  "Everynight" [sic] (Paul McCartney);  "Society Strut" (Mack/Van Gleason);  "Lullaby of Broadway" (Harry Warren/Al Dubin);  "Speak Low" (Kurt Weill/Ogden Nash);  "Banana King Louie" (John);  My Melancholy Baby" (Keller/Van Gleason);  "Beechwood 4-5789" (Stevenson/Gordy/Gaye);  "That's the Way It Was (from Dvorak's 'New World Symphony')" (Bocci/Frost-Keller/Van Gleason);  "Back In the Saddle Again"  (Whitley/Autry).  Rich 06:12, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discography addition 

message: Is the change in the Chattanooga Choo Choo lyrics verified as a drug reference? It seems a natural conclusion based on comparison with the original lyrics. Why else would they make that change? But unless a band member has verified that this is intended as a drug reference, I would not make the assumption.Jkolak (talk) 07:07, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Drug Reference

message: "Neither Randy Newman, Van Dyke Parks, nor Harry Nilsson were ever members of the Tikis or Harpers Bizarre."  Then why is Randy Newman listed under Past members in the box on the right side of the page? 68.134.232.137 (talk) 18:55, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Past Members
Talk:Toyota Industries

message: Removed this bit: "It is the parent company of Toyota Motor Corporation." I seriously doubt that. Christopher Mahan 19:58, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:21 Ramadan

message: I asked Irishpunktom why he added the disputed tag and he replied on my talk page with:
:Hey, The reason I added the  is because I've always understood that all muslims believe that the first revealaton occoured on the 27th of Ramadan, or the Laylat al-Qadr.  But i'm not 100% on this. --Irishpunktom\talk 09:36, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  The exact date of Laylat al-Qadr is disputed by Shia and Sunni scholars. There are differing reports even within one particular Islamic sect. Adamcaliph 17:31, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

text: I agree with the above comment as it is not known for sure the exact date the Quran was first revealed and any mention is pure speculation.  Also, the Gregorian date used in the article seems to be incorrect following a quick conversion using multiple convertors via a google search.  August 10, 610 apparently coresponds to Ramadan 15, 13 B.H, which would make August 16, to be Ramadan 21.  Nonetheless, it should be noted that the date may be off by a day in either direction.  Pepsidrinka 02:30, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:Parapsychologists

message: I thought that the term parapsychologist was reserved for people who study and research the paranormal, like Susan Blackmore and Tenhaeff, not for mediums and people who claim to have parnormal powers, like Gerard Croiset. Andries 20:18, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Susan Blackmore has now given up on parapsychology, after many years being a known skeptic in the field, so should she still be included here? ACEOREVIVED 19:49, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Should Susan Blackmore still be here?
Talk:Moscow Kremlin Wall

message: As it is, this article is very hard to read. It needs proper paragraphing, and perhaps some sub-headings, to improve readability. JDH Owens talk | Esperanza 20:21, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: I propose that the article be merged with Kremlin Towers. -- Kuban kazak 18:39, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge Request
Talk:Post-processual archaeology

message: Well, we can all definitely tell where this author is coming from. I do find this synopsis to be very much in 'one camp', and I am seeking to dispute the objectivity of this article. 
Yet rambling on and ruffling my feathers wont solve the issue, so I shall work on a counter article.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.52.14.18 (talk) 6 October 2005
:Please work on the existing one instead. I agree that much of the article seems to have been edited by someone with a one-dimensional view of post-procesualism, I've been putting off digging out my theory books to tackle it for ages now. I may make a start at the weekend. adamsan 21:56, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quality of the article 

message: "Postprocessualism has become dominant in Europe, with some archaeologists speculating that the rise of postprocessualism there may be a direct result of anti-American sentiment."
This seems like a pretty bizare claim. Does anyone have references to tie it to a specific individual? VoluntarySlave 04:25, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  anti-americanism 

message: Where are all the examples of how post-processual theory has been applied to the material record. This is so far nothing but a polemic on theory.
76.170.1.189 (talk) 22:14, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Apparently Ian Hodder in an unreferenced entry in Çatalhöyük #Archaeology.—6birc (talk) 16:32, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Examples?

message: It's great to see someone whip the archaeological theory articles into shape, I think it's very hard to write them in away that's not made completely unintelligible by jargon, but this manages it. It might be an idea to put in a discussion of some of the main sub-strands, which would also provide some more concrete examples of post-processual interpretation. Overall I think this is a really good article though. Maybe you should submit it for GA review. —Joseph RoeTk•Cb, 11:54, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: As the editor responsible for pretty much all of the recent additions and tidy up, many thanks for your kind words. I think there are still some more things needed to it, for instance an expanded criticism section, so would advise against submitting it for GA or any other review just yet.(Midnightblueowl (talk) 10:40, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reassessed
Talk:List of military awards and decorations of the Gulf War

message: I need to come back and reformat this page like:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Awards_and_decorations_of_the_United_States_Army
I have images of some of the medals that don't have their own page, but no criteria.  This would be a a good way to get these documented.  In my spare time --Gadget850 20:23, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:Penthouse Pets

message: It appears neither Holly nor Suze Randall were ever a Penthouse pet. Recommend they be removed from this list. Dpimco 20:35, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong names

message: Is "models who have appeared in the centerfold" absolutely synonymous with "Penthouse pet of the month/year"? -Raybnay (talk) 19:25, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: The definition of who is included
Talk:Ricardo Maduro

message: I certainly agree what was there at the end of the second paragraph was in need of change. What was there implied that Maduuro and his Congress were being successful against the gangs, which is evidently not true, but is now been completely reworded in an more neutral way, SqueakBox 20:47, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: How can it be determined if they are being successful fighting against the gangs? One of the factors is the number of people that have been imprisoned (which has already been included). What other factors can be taken in consideration here? We can't just say "widely" not only because it is POV but because we are not mentioning the factors why it is not being successful. --Vizcarra 20:59, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: POV
Talk:General National Vocational Qualification

message: I must make clear that in order to enter Intermediate GNVQ you must pass the Foundation GNVQ or a minimal set of GCSE's at D or E grade. The Foundation GNVQ does not need entry qualifications, sometimes open to interview before the student begins the course. 
Draig goch20 20:48, 6 October 2005 (UTC)

message: "Generally Not Very Qualified". This is bias toward one view. Not everyone thinks the GNVQ is low in quality, there are people that I know have entered some good places of work with an Intermediate. Some people would disagree with this, though not many.
:Where is the evidence that this was said, because the GNVQ was not even an equivalent of the A-level, and I was educated with a GNVQ myself and got further. People are generally becoming stupid every day. Amlder20 18:02, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  The old GNVQ was ok, but it was no different to your average GCSE/A Level. A GCSE exam can be retaken in November or January, depending on your exam board, the same with A levels, but no one claims these courses to be useless (unless your old and feel young people are having it 'easy').  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.11.223.222 (talk) 19:16, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias 

message: I'm not sure that removing the text completely is a good idea. There is a common misconception that GNVQs aren't worth four GCSEs. Weren't GNVQs originally designed for those who struggled with A-levels, or wanted to re-enter the curriculum at a later age? Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry 02:12, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Not worth much"

message: "GNVQs were used in a lot of schools in Wales in three dominant subjects: Engineering, Health and Social Care and Leisure and Tourism.". Your correct, but you missed out the subject of Information and Communication Technology, which was a widely used GNVQ course in the South of Wales.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.11.221.164 (talk) 13:57, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  GNVQ in Wales 

message: Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 22:58, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help search for [[WP:RS|Independent, reliable sources]]
Talk:Blawgers

message: So far, so good.  I like how the unnecessary has been pared away - I started the Legal subsection of Blog, which was narrowed appropriately and then partly copied and reclipped here.  I like what's been done.  I would also note that "Prawf" as in law Prof has some traction, due in large part to the PrawfsBlawg but predating it.  Most other neologisms, as noted, have not been successful to date.--Eh Nonymous 20:51, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Darrell Issa

message: Issa's campaign released advertisements that highlighted Carl Demaio's sexuality. Demaio was also a candidate for the 48th district and Issa defended his campaign ads stating that the campaign was taking headlines from newspapers. Could an article on said scandal get inserted to the page? 2600:8801:FB13:6B00:7EBF:94CA:BBB8:65D4 (talk) 01:31, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a request for a contribution to this page ￼ 2600:8801:FB13:6B00:7EBF:94CA:BBB8:65D4 (talk) 01:34, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Carl Demaio campaign ads
Talk:Red-eye gravy

message: : The flour is added to the ham grease drippings to make a white gravy, not a red-eye gravy. The white gravy is then peppered.
-Wayne County, Mississippi
* Indeed. Anyone who found that this page does not describe the food they were looking for, is probably looking for  sawmill gravy. I'm adding that as a "See Also"... ExOttoyuhr (talk) 23:14, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment 

message: What is your reference? I am a native Mississippian and I've never heard of it. Many Mississippians are opposed to the use of alcohol on religious grounds. Historically, wine has not been widely available. When alcohol has been available, it has usually been corn whiskey. Maybe you found one recipe for it somewhere, but that does not support this generalization.BinkyGee (talk) 02:23, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Mississippi variation uses red wine in the place of coffee.
Talk:Potsdamer

message: The generic term is shandy; merging would give both articles richer context. --Wetman 21:01, 6 October 2005 (UTC)

message: I don't know if the names vary in different parts of Northeast Germany, but I spent a month in Brandenburg and they called beer mixed with woodruff or berry limonade a Potsdamer.  If you know that it goes by other names, go ahead and add them, but what I wrote isn't incorrect.
As for merging it with shandy, that seems like a fine idea.  I'm a bit of a n00b, so I wouldn't know how to do it.  --Doctor Love 22:47, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maybe incomplete, but not wrong
Talk:John de Taxster

message: It is quite difficult to find articles concerning de Taxster and his chronicle online. I was unable to find other sources outside of websites that had the same Catholic Encyclopedia article. I'll work on finding additional information. --Caponer 21:23, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The reference to Everisden is probably based on outdated scholarship. Charles Matthews 19:35, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Alpha Kappa Alpha

message: I have just created and published a new article, List of Alpha Kappa Alpha chapters. There is some missing data, especially related to inactive collegiate and graduate chapters. If you know of sources for this information, please help improve the list. Thanks. Rublamb (talk) 04:13, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of chapters 

message: , an editor just removed a "non-bidirectional navbox" that is,  Should this otherwise be adjusted on the other side?  I don't fully understand the use of the term, bi-directionality here, but suspect that Alpha Kappa Alpha should have this template.  Would you look at this? Jax MN (talk) 22:45, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with the change. In *general* for navboxes, only those pages *with* the navbox on it should be linked from the navbox and vice versa. (See Wikipedia:BIDIRECTIONAL) I've actually removed/added links and removed/added templates to reach that. (In fact I have done so within the last day with colleges which are *part* of Universities in Maryland) I do leave a *few*, for example, the Professional Fraternities navbox has a link to the NIC since a few have migrated there and :Template:Phi Beta Sigma articles does have links to Howard University and NPHC. But for Alpha Kappa Alpha to include a navbox to the list of all NPHCs, I would probably have done the exact same edit myself.Naraht (talk) 23:42, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

text: In fact, I even found a tool that enables me to check for that balance, https://templatetransclusioncheck.toolforge.org/index.php?lang=en . In fact the new preferred documentation for Templates includes this. See :Template:Minnesota Vikings roster navbox for an example.Naraht (talk) 23:46, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Template:HBCU still isn't completely balanced, but the remaining three are "parts" of HBCUs with some level of independence, I'll have to think about whether to add them to the template, drop the template from those articles or neither.Naraht (talk) 00:04, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

text: Yes, those are pretty much the reasons why I removed the HBCU template. Indyguy (talk) 00:13, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  HBCU template
Talk:Undecidable

message: Undecidable means not decidable, decidable has a disambiguation page, so we might want to redirect undecidable to decidable to give it the same disambiguation variants), rather than to decision problem. Anyway, I don't see a reason to make decidable and undecidable asymmetric in terms of dismbiguation. Could perhaps someone help in these rearrangements, I don't feel experencied enough to perform them.--Imz 22:06, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: So one asymmetry is that "undecidable" is sometimes used to mean "independent"; that's why I've turned this into a (separate) disambig page. "Decidable" to mean "not independent" is rarer. --Trovatore 18:24, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: dab
Talk:Developed economy

message: This article was redirected to Developed country as a result of an Articles for Deletion debate. The discussion can be found here. -Splashtalk 22:06, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Articles for Deletion debate

message: Monto QR retirar de cuenta debito 0000001123456702 177.226.106.218 (talk) 20:07, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cash money autority 900507 $20,000,000.00 USD
Talk:Timeline of aviation in the 18th century

message: "1785 - Richard Crosbie makes several unsuccessful attempts to cross the Irish Channel in a helium-filled balloon."  Considering helium wasn't discovered until 1868 and wasn't isolated chemically until 1895, I _don't_ think this is likely.  Hydrogen, perhaps?  Source material would help. Tevildo 22:12, 6 October 2005 (UTC)

message: The entry for 1780 indicates that the USAF was founded during the American Revolution, and the citation merely reads "D. J. Trump." However, President Trump had misspoken when he said those words, so I'm not sure why they are shown here as if they were fact.ArmageddonAviation (talk) 12:00, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible False Citation