Talk:Project Milo

message: This article seems to have a severe lack of full stops!!! PureLegend 17:59, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No..this article appears to have a lack of confirmed details. I'm deleting all of the made up crap. Grymsqueaker 10:15, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Ugh

message: Um the article first says it's a codename for a game currently being developed. It then goes on to explain the project stopped and was replaced. It sounds as if the second is probably correct, but perhaps it's all rumours and the article should just be deleted in the absence of reliable sourcing Nil Einne (talk) 19:55, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: True. The article claims it may have been replaced by Fable 2, however it gives a link to an updated site which now says "Peter was talking about Fable 2 in ways which sounded a lot like another secretive Lionhead project known as Dimitri, leading us to speculate that the two peojects had become the same game. Today we can reveal that this is NOT the case!" ~ http://games.kikizo.com/news/200610/015.asp -- I am erasing the rumours.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wixpert (talk • contribs) 06:59, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Um what? 

message: I've moved the article after spotting the correct spelling at a number of sources, Edge, Eurogamer and Lionhead's own website. - X201 (talk) 09:12, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move 

message: Game will not be released, according to an MS exec. Article should be amended or most likely deleted.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.99.15.253 (talk) 17:41, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: That was two days ago, from an ill informed PR. The story has moved on since then. And even if it was only a tech demo that would still not be criteria enough to delete the article. We have plenty of articles for cancelled games, the criteria for inclusion in Wikipedia is not if they are released but if they are notable. - X201 (talk) 18:39, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tech demo, won't be released 

message: since milo and kate is in development hell and no release date this is vaporware shouldent this be nentioned in the artical?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.175.144.84 (talk) 07:08, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Have you read the whole article? In several parts it debates whether or not it's a real game...Sergecross73 msg me  13:15, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

text: I'm very aware of what vaporware is, and that it doesn't just apply to games. The article debates whether or not its a game, a tech-demo, or if it's ever really supposed to be released at all, much like the term vaporware. It essentially discusses it without using the actual term itself. And the term kind of has a negative connotation, so don't be surprised if people who believe it's "a real game with a future release" take it out. I'd provide a reliable source if I were you and wanted it to stay in the article... Sergecross73 msg me  12:41, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is vaporware 

message: I could be wrong, since I’m no gamer, but I was under the impression this was one of the most famous hoaxes in gaming. Certainly, the concept sounds far fetched to me, and I’ve seen the video and at one point the water begins to "interact" BEFORE the woman in it reaches her hand out. It still hasn’t been released, of course. And I always thought this was well established as a blatant hoax. Am I wrong in that? I mean, I 100% believe it is, but I understand that’s not enough and we would need a source for a claim like this, which is why I’m asking here. --StrexcorpEmployee (talk) 11:57, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is this article written as if it’s real?