Talk:Committee on the Present Danger

message: This looks like yet another nail in the credibility of Wikipedia.  The bulk of this article (including the long stretch in quotes) is ripped straight from a "progressive" group's website, and not a responsible one at that.  Pathetic.
________
Ummm . . . . should American-Israel Public Affairs Committee be the American-Israeli Political Action Committee?  (AIPAC)  I would change it, but I want to be sure of the author's intention here.
Why are there so many quotation marks in this article? Is it copied from another source? -Will Beback 21:50, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There's this note near the end: Note: See original article for footnoted material, as well as other extensive information on CPD. What up with that? heqs 11:38, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds like the whole article is a copyvio from a page that doesn't exist anymore. This needs a complete rewrite (though most of the information copied seems both accurate and mostly NPOV). csloat 22:44, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The article has been largely copied from a website, RightWeb, which does have a Creative Commons 3.0 license. However, the failure to properly cite or footnote the contributions of that source does appear to violate WP policies. This is being investigated by experts with the copyright violation noticeboard.  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 08:54, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright violation or plagiarism?

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://web.archive.org/web/20021217213107/http://www.publiceye.org/research/Group_Watch/Entries-42.htm. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:42, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks again for your help! Cheers,  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 20:01, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: I'm going to add some sources and expand some of the sections on the CPD. I've just finished a PhD that examined the 1970s version of the group, so have some good sources to contribute.
nickblackbourn (talk) 13:06, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding Citations and Additional Information 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Committee on the Present Danger. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150813124828/http://committeeonthepresentdanger.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1744&Itemid=89 to http://www.committeeonthepresentdanger.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1744&Itemid=89
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160220161351/http://committeeonthepresentdanger.org/index.php?option=com_cpdfront&Itemid=90 to http://www.committeeonthepresentdanger.org/index.php?option=com_cpdfront&Itemid=90
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:36, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The Committee on the Present Danger has been "reborn", so to speak, as evidenced by https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=piT8Zmuo6J4, as well as https://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/2019/03/25/live-stream-blue-ribbon-team-launches-the-committee-on-the-present-danger-china%EF%BB%BF/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by AndreskX (talk • contribs) 20:53, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is in need of updating 

message: Good article in the NYT, which includes some quotes that would improve the WP:NPOV of the entry. 
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/20/us/politics/china-red-scare-washington.html</br>
A New Red Scare Is Reshaping Washington</br>
By Ana Swanson</br>
The New York Times</br>
July 20, 2019</br>
The administration paints the crackdown as necessary to protect the United States. But there are growing concerns that it is stoking a new red scare, fueling discrimination against students, scientists and companies with ties to China and risking the collapse of a fraught but deeply enmeshed trade relationship between the world’s two largest economies.
“I’m worried that some people are going to say, because of this fear, any policy is justifiable,” said Scott Kennedy, a China expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.
--Nbauman (talk) 22:52, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  NYT story