lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of stations in London fare zones 7–14

message: This is confirmed in the 2008 fares document.  MRSC • Talk 12:39, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Zones 7, 8 & 9

message: Could the article explain the way in which 7 to 9 are ancillary? Are they actually that, or are they just zones?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.189.103.145 (talk) 10:16, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: ancillary

message: These stations are all outside Zone 6 but accept Oyster ticketing, should there be something in the article that reflects this, other than "TBD"? Nordic Nightfury 14:37, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: We need WP:RS for those. --Redrose64 (talk) 21:03, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Merstham - Gatwick

message: Would it be possible to show these stations on a map as per here?  Crookesmoor (talk) 09:03, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Not easily. The  at List of stations in London fare zone 6 works from , which covers all but one of the stations listed in that article - and no others (the category doesn't have Heathrow Central railway station but the Heathrow stations are strange). However, for List of stations in London fare zones 7–W, there is no category that is common to all of these stations, but also does not include any stations not listed here. For instance, Amersham is in  and Bushey is in , but there are no categories that both of these are in. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 13:31, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map 

message: Can someone move it to its correct alphabetical position (as tables are easy to 'dislocate'). Jackiespeel (talk) 17:44, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Just mark from one new-row marker |- to the next, omit either one of them, cut, and paste elsewhere. . --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 20:57, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Some things require more practice than others to see how they 'work' and it is quicker to ask (which occasionally leads to other things being 'dealt with'). Jackiespeel (talk) 10:21, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bushey Station 

message: I would like to move this page to List of stations in London fare zones 7–9. Firstly, there is no such zone W; this article only refers to zones 7–9. The official name for this article is Zones 7–9, and I don't understand why this page is called List of stations in London fare zones 7–W when the ideal name would be Zones 7–9. It is not possible for me to make a proper move since the page title already exists as a redirect to this article, and  reverted me when I tried to make a cut and paste move. Can someone either delete the redirect List of stations in London fare zones 7–9 so I can rename this article normally, or simply discuss here the reason for the strange title? C2A06 (About • Talk • Edits) 08:06, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I reverted you; and I explained why at your talk page. There I also directed you to the requested moves process. You have since removed the message, but it's still in the page history, . --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 08:42, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Page move to [[List of stations in London fare zones 7–9]]
Talk:Tramlink route 2

message: *This article needs to be written\rewritten from a neutral point of view. 
*Sauces Sources are not cited
*The history is more of a route description so this needs to be split and sorted. 
Simply south (talk) 22:43, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Things 

message: The difference between namings is the way the name is said, for example Tramlink routes is the combined naming, whereas Tramlink Route 2 is the actual name of the single route and as a noun, all words should have capital letters. Nathan A RF (talk) 16:06, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect to the correct naming 

message: I have found that the other route pages are now redirects to the main Tranlink article - would this be easier? The route itself has marginal claim for inclusion on WP...? IamMattDavies (talk) 10:46, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Make redirect
Talk:Raspberry and cream tart

message: This looks suspiciously like it belongs in Wikibooks Cookbook, it's just a recipe rather than something that deserves a Wikipedia article. Unless someone can find multiple, independent sources talking about it? FlagSteward 20:03, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think it's a recipe typical of any particular culture and probably does not merit its own WP article. Badagnani (talk) 06:39, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Transwiki?
Talk:The Sect of the Phoenix

message: Is it reasonable to regard this article as a stub, implying that it should be lengthened? This policy will lead to the absurd situation where articles pertaining short stories are longer than the stories themselves!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.13.147.249 (talk) 05:13, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

message: Did Borges actually mention a homosexual experience in an interview? That doesn't seem like him at all from what I know of him. I got the impression he was quite private about stuff like that. There's no citation or anything.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.22.1.19 (talk) 05:29, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Homosexuality 

message: This article in its current state is clearly heavily biased towards one interpretation and not written in a neutral style at all.
:I'm not sure whether (or which way) it's biased, but the tone is surely wrong.  Evidently, whoever made these changes wanted to promote his pet ideas (which may or may not be right, and may or may not be standard), and wrote this like a pedantic literary debate, not like an encyclopedic article.  On the other hand, fairly precise references were provided, which is the main reason why I didn't felt right to simply revert the changes.  But if you think you can rewrite the article so that the information and references provided by these changes are preserved but the tone is made right and the bias you discern is removed, that would certainly be good. --Gro-Tsen (talk) 18:35, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias
Talk:Royal Docks Heritage Railway

message: Although proposed to happen around North Woolwich railway station this pipe-dream is not encyclopedic material for that article. I have brought all its details, beloved by some, into its own article whose deletion, considering that it was it a sandcastle overcome by the incoming Crossrail tide, I should not oppose.--SilasW (talk) 10:09, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  No redirect 

message: I am opposed to deletion.  This was a genuine project, although it did not come to fruition, and it is of historic interest. Biscuittin (talk) 21:48, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Keep article 

message: The equivalent page on London Wiki  can be used for the material if deletion of the WP article is re-proposed. Jackiespeel (talk) 22:20, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  London Wiki
Talk:List of Shaman King characters

message: Though this may come up as alarm to some, Takei has stated in his Kang Zeng Bang reprint of volumes 3 & 4 that he is Pirika's partner spirit. Haftorang 23:04, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Torara

message: I propose some of the characters be merged into this section as some of the articles are totally unreferenced. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 02:14, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I wouldn't be opposed.  They could probably be summed up in a paragraph or two in this article without any problems. Hewinsj (talk) 16:33, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with some of the characters being merged, however Joco and Hao have been merged, which I believe to be a mistake. Yes, this falls under WP:I like it, however Joco has no information left and is simply described as an African american shaman. It neglects to metnion any of his relvance to the story. Hao is decribed as the main antagonist, but is only a few paragraphs, while his followers have a page to themselves. His character was the source of huge analysis on human nature, and a deeply rooted backstory. Likewise, several characters that were not part of the main cast still have pages (Yohken, Yohmei, Mikihisa, Matamune, etc.).SandSan (talk) 22:08, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: When did Chocolove murder people,he looks nice  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.163.15.26 (talk) 02:07, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Murder?
Talk:Hatsuno Station

message: I created this outline article to turn red links blue.  I plan to continue working on it in the future.  The goal was to get at least a starter article going for stations that don't have one at all.  If the English is bad, please fix it.  Thanks.  Hosikawafuzi 17:22, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Creation of the Article
Talk:Momponai Station

message: I created this outline article to turn red links blue.  I plan to continue working on it in the future.  The goal was to get at least a starter article going for stations that don't have one at all.  If the English is bad, please fix it.  Thanks.  Hosikawafuzi 17:23, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Creation of the Article
Talk:Onnenai Station

message: I created this outline article to turn red links blue.  I plan to continue working on it in the future.  The goal was to get at least a starter article going for stations that don't have one at all.  If the English is bad, please fix it.  Thanks.  Hosikawafuzi 17:23, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Creation of the Article
Talk:Toyoshimizu Station

message: I created this outline article to turn red links blue.  I plan to continue working on it in the future.  The goal was to get at least a starter article going for stations that don't have one at all.  If the English is bad, please fix it.  Thanks.  Hosikawafuzi 17:23, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Creation of the article
Talk:Teshiogawa-Onsen Station

message: I created this outline article to turn red links blue.  I plan to continue working on it in the future.  The goal was to get at least a starter article going for stations that don't have one at all.  If the English is bad, please fix it.  Thanks.  Hosikawafuzi 17:24, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Creation of the Article
Talk:Sakkuru Station

message: I created this outline article to turn red links blue.  I plan to continue working on it in the future.  The goal was to get at least a starter article going for stations that don't have one at all.  If the English is bad, please fix it.  Thanks.  Hosikawafuzi 17:24, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Creation of the Article
Talk:Otoineppu Station

message: I created this outline article to turn red links blue.  I plan to continue working on it in the future.  The goal was to get at least a starter article going for stations that don't have one at all.  If the English is bad, please fix it.  Thanks.  Hosikawafuzi 17:24, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Creation of the Article
Talk:Richard Carlson (actor)

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: Move. Cúchullain t/c 19:06, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Obviously there are no "edits" allowed on the discussion above, but I assume commenting is still okay. The idea that an obscure author of books no one I know (including me) ever heard of is somehow "more popular" than an actor who starred in two television series seen and remembered by millions and which played in syndication for two decades in every broadcast market in the word -- ridiculous. And dismissing his work in features as "B-movie appearances" is like dismissing the other guy's work as "several phony baloney New Age pamphlets."Ted Newsom (talk) 18:58, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move
Talk:Jamal Tirawi

message: Does anyone have any further information on Tirawi, especially on his contributions to governance at the PLC?  Also, bio information like DOB, wife, family, education, etc?  
All I can find are the news reports I have referenced and similar.  I'd like to flesh it out. Bigglove 17:30, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bio information needed
Talk:Lee Bailong

message: The character's name in the English version, "Lee Pai-Long", is NOT a Cantonese pronunciation of "Lee Bailong". It would be closer to "Lee Bak-Lung" or something similar. Anyways, I've removed that bit. --Mewarmo990 02:06, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's some weird thing about the romanization, using the older system that gave us "Peking" and such. --Raijinili 19:29, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

text: Also, Pailong is easier to say in English. Which might be related to the above system. --Raijinili 19:31, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Cantonese" pronounciation... not.
Talk:Dale Van Sickel

message: I am confused about his yearbook picture, "1930 Seminoles". He went to Unv of Florida, per the article, which is the Gators. The Seminoles are Florida State. Is this a typo? Or did he have an association with a different team called the Seminoles? IAMpandaCorn (talk) 02:18, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seminoles
Talk:Mongolian Latin alphabet

message: Does your computer display the 2nd "z" properly? Mine shows a little rectangle instead. Gantuya eng 17:38, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Mine displays it, but in a different font from the others. OS is WIN XP, browser is IE7. Yaan 17:41, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks perfectly fine on Vista with Firefox 2. You need a complete enough Unicode on your system. --Latebird 21:16, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Copied to MS Word looks fine, but on MS Internet Explorer I always have troubles with the accented Latin letters. Gantuya eng 01:03, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Latin script

message: Does anyone else think it would be a good idea to give the sample text in cyrillic and in a transcription from trad. Mongolian? Yaan (talk) 13:01, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It would at least be good to provide a translation to it. V85 (talk) 22:52, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Sample text

message: Sorry - just passing through, and in the middle of something, so no time to figure it out to my satisfaction to make changes, but should point out this is wrong.  The 'Latin character law' in the national archives actually is from 1931, not 1941.  (1941 is roughly when Cyrillic was adopted.)  I'd change this, except I can't confirm either the February or March dates, and don't really have time right now to rewrite the whole thing.  Just thought I'd point this out if someone is watching the page, has references and/or time.  Danzan Bagsh (talk) 15:25, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've changed the date to 1931, with a proper source. The rest of the article is still problematic. --Gregor Kneussel (talk) 10:07, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect date

message: "The orthography of the Mongolian Latin ... preserves short final vowels." If that is true, how could this happen? And what are we to make of that?  I have removed the unsourced sample text. Please do not re-insert without a proper citation. This article is rather useless in its present form. --Gregor Kneussel (talk) 04:33, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sample and orthography 

message: In my opinion, the Mongolian and Buryat scripts are confused here in the article. Yes, the Buryat language until 1956 was called the "Buryat-Mongolian language", but still these two languages ​​developed differently. Therefore, the written language of the Buryat language had nothing to do with the Mongolian language.--Modun (talk) 14:40, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Latin script of 1931-1939 years
Talk:Ceann Ear

message: Haswell-Smith: 231ha; List: 203ha; Gazetteer: 357ha (also H-S for group). OS shows high point (17m) at SW end; not Coilleag Mhòr nan Dàmh in NE. Does anyone have further info? Finavon (talk) 19:25, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Area & height
Talk:Alphabet effect

message: I put the original db-copyvio tag on this article -- I'd like to request that it NOT be deleted until we can figure out if this is original text or not -- turns out some of the sources may have taken it from Wikipedia, but more investigation needs to be done.  Is there a way to mark an article as maybe/maybe not a copyvio? -- ArglebargleIV 17:39, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's pretty clear that the alleged source site is really just a Wikipedia mirror. -- intgr [talk] 09:53, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright violation?
Talk:Cielo Vista Mall

message: Cielo Vista Mall is in Exit 24 or 25, IIRC on the I-10. Sunland Park is on Exit 11, and that is on the West side of the city. So it is impossible for Sunland Park to be "20 miles from downtown El Paso". It is more like 10 miles or less.
Mexican Border is about 5 miles if you count distance from the Cordova de las Americas international bridge (exit 23 on I-10, and definitely less than a mile from there to the actual bridge), but it may be even less to the actual border. Though in practice, 5 miles would be pretty accurate. 148.244.43.169 17:39, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Google maps route via I-10 is 14.2 miles. Dicklyon 17:42, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Change the numbers as you see fit. I took the 20 miles figure from the mall's own info. No big deal to me. Realkyhick 19:53, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 20 miles from downtown
Talk:Scorpion (disambiguation)

message: Just so we're clear as to why "scorpions" is redirected here; it is long standing Wikipedia precedent that plural versions of terms that have a Wikipedia article or disambiguation pages be re-directed to the primary term page. Besides, the frist 2 pages (19 listings) of Google search results for "scorpions" brings up 13 related to the arthropod and 6 are related to the German band . "Scorpions" is just as much of a general term with multiple meanings as "scorpion."  It's for cases like this are why there are disambiguation pages. --Oakshade 17:42, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There are currently 119 mainspace links to Scorpions. Of those, 102 (86%) are intending to refer to the band. There is an overwhelming case for redirecting Scorpions to Scorpions (band) (I have already added a redirect warning on that page back to Scorpion (disambiguation). If you disagree, I suggest you take it upon yourself to correct all 102 links. Then you'll be in a position to argue. If you're prepared to do that, then I'll take on fixing the remaining 17 to point to Scorpion. Colonies Chris 13:11, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll do a few, but because editors of those pages made an error doesn't mean a proper re-direct must be adjusted to be an improper one.  Over time, those editors will correct those links.  --Oakshade 00:40, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

text: I did more than a few.  Most, if not all, of the "Scorpions" non-talk page links meant for the German band go directly to that band's article instead of here now.  --Oakshade 01:39, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Scorpions

message: In french this word is written Scorpion and not Skorpion. Thanks to redirect the language link in the good direction :
http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scorpion_(homonymie)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.190.21.247 (talk) 08:33, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Bad link
Talk:High score Scrabble

message: I'm desperately trying to find sources but this variant disappeared so long before the Internet became popular, I can't get anything! Mglovesfun 17:52, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Check with the organizations that held this type of tournament. MMetro (talk) 00:55, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:TilEm

message: Just started this page. Needs more information. Shruti14 (talk • contribs) 17:56, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: New Page
Talk:Chamela-Cuixmala Biosphere Reserve

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.parkswatch.org/parkprofile.php?l=eng&country=mex&park=ccbr&page=sum. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moneytrees🌴Talk🌲Help out at CCI!  23:56, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Nazi book burnings

message: Would it be appropriate to link to Disco Demolition Night in the ‘see also’ section? It was a promoted burning of media that some have claimed was rooted in homophobia and racism that resulted in a riot. Victor Grigas (talk) 23:28, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm inclined to think no as the scope and seriousness of the topics are very different. The Disco Demolition Night article does have a quote comparing the event to Nazi book burning though.Citing (talk) 16:05, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disco Demolition Night? 

message: — Assignment last updated by Audreyed03 (talk) 21:32, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I've edited this a little.  I'm not sure that citing your own essay is a sufficient source, although you have also mentioned the newspapers concerned. If anyone wants to bring the full cites for the newspapers in, that would be a good thing.  All the best: Rich Farmbrough 13:24, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: German History, 1900-1945

message: I've set the above mentioned section within a couple of more generic headers.  The US response is documented in various places, this link to the Holocaust Museum web site is a good starting point, though it jumps about in time, and focuses on Jewish and anti-Nazi reactions.
It would be good to get a wider viewpoint, including the rest of the world.  It would also be good to see the matrix for the 1933 burnings, I.E. how does this compare to other countries and other times.  All the best: Rich Farmbrough 13:24, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Response in the US