lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Australian Recording Industry Association

message: I propose that Lady Gaga's entry for having 7 Top 5 singles from the same album be deleted, as ARIA (on which this page is based) considered "The Fame Monster" to be a completely separate release to "The Fame", and charted it as such. Consequently, it is misleading to combine the two for a chart record, when ARIA (and, indeed, Lady Gaga herself), considered them to be separate releases.  Katy Perry's "record" should be asterisked, too, as the album was re-released with additional tracks (Billboard prefaces her chart record when discussing it).  However, Katy's is a different situation to Lady Gaga's.211.31.244.187 (talk) 10:57, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lady Gaga - The Fame Monster was a separate release in Australia 

message: I can find no List of Australian No.1 Singles that has 'Hey Jude' at No.1 for 16 Weeks. The 1979 Billboard Article, that 
claimed that it was a 16 Week No.1, was wrong.
The Wikipedia Page, of 1960's Australian No.1 Singles, gives it no more than  13 Weeks at No.1. Another source gives it
14 Weeks at No.1. So, 'Fernando', by ABBA, is Australia's 'Most Weeks at No.1' Single, with  its 14 No.1 Weeks. 
'Hey Jude' is 2nd= with 'Gangsta's Paradise'.[[86.13.2.211 (talk) 22:46, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hey Jude - The Beatles 

message: Needs a new logo for ARIA. FireDragonValo (talk) 07:44, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  New ARIA logo 

message: I feel like it could use a pronunciation guide. Is it pronounced
- ah-ree-uh, like the musical feature;
- ay-ree-uh, more consistent with Australian English;
- ay-ar-eye-ay, where the  acronym is spelt like a string of letters
Being British, I see barely any reference to them in sources I am exposed to, so perhaps an Aussie might be able to help out and provide an RS/IPA? Couruu (talk) 15:10, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation
Talk:Olive Osmond

message: For a discussion on the proposed merge, see Talk:The Osmonds. –SESmith 04:46, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Propsed merge

message: "Perhaps the only dents in the their squeaky-clean image have been ...., and the family's campaign against the Equal Rights Amendment from being passed in Utah."
Explain why opposing the ERA would put a dent in their squeaky clean image?75.67.234.133 (talk) 11:04, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Gone. Fat&Happy (talk) 03:56, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: POV assertion
Talk:Aerdy

message: Despite what may be written in the unofficial Greychrondex, I believe you must subtract 1 from any pre-1 CY date, since there was no "year zero." If this is correct, the date of the Battle of a Fortnight's Length should be returned to -109 CY. Thoughts?--Iquander 00:13, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, I think they way that works is you subtract one when calculating the number of years passed, not the date itself. IE, from -100 CY to 100 CY = 199 years, not 200. For 200 years, it'd have to be either -101 to 100, or -100 to 101. Now, if we're calculating a date, we'd have to add one, thus 600 years ago from 596 would be -5, not -4. Of course, I'm no math wizard, but I'm sure we could find one to set us straight.-Robbstrd 03:29, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  That Pesky Year 0
Talk:TurboGears

message: I have, in the past, removed links from this page to the article about Django, and links to this page from the article about Django, on the grounds that these links are redundant; the category link for "web application frameworks" offers a much more complete and much more maintainable listing.
Is there a pressing reason to keep adding links to specific frameworks despite this? Ubernostrum 00:14, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Raising this question again; I've once again pruned links from the Django article, explaining on the talk page that it's much more efficient just to rely on the link to the frameworks category. Is there a pressing need to duplicate this information in this article? Ubernostrum 04:28, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

text: I'd think so, but I haven't had time to scrupulously police these things and I was hoping to wait until some sort of consensus had been reached. Ubernostrum 16:18, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inter-framework linking
Talk:Robot combat

message: MechWarfare resides in, but does not fit neatly in the definition of Robot Combat. This page discusses robot combat as a single type of competition since it was written prior to the advent of new types. The intent is to provide readers with an awareness of an evolving and developing community and event type, and possibly provide the genesis another page in the process. Brant Fetter (talk) 19:14, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not certain that the recent addition of 'Mech Warfare' fits well in this article. I would support a new page on the topic that links to the 'Robot Combat' page, but this is clearly a seaparate branch of robotics without direct relation to the style of robot combat discussed here. Run Amok (talk) 17:22, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

text: After due consideration, I removed the Mech Warfare sections from the article. It is only indirectly related to classic robot combat and should have its own article linked to the robot combat page. Run Amok (talk) 16:11, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subject Branch 

message: The 'unverified claims' tag added to the Robot Combat page says to look to the 'talk' section for guidance, but there is no guidance here. I would appreciate either guidance or the removal of the tag.Run Amok (talk) 23:24, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unverified Claims? 

message: Can robot combat be considered a sport?
--Fixuture (talk) 05:03, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I suppose it could be classified as either an e-sport or a motorsport, battlebots.com calls it a 'Robot Fighting Sport' JeffUK (talk) 21:19, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

text: Most people involved consider it a sport. I don't know how much weight that carries, though. ShadowLeopardBeetleweightGuy (talk) 16:31, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A sport? 

message: The link present for the following text leads to an orphaned article.  Yes I could just remove it but I thought I'd raise it via here instead in case anyone had a better link or disagreed.
* The sixth season of BattleBots in 2015 failed to explicitly exclude entanglement devices, which resulted in at least one controversial decision.
DNSLOC (talk) 07:54, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link not broken but content no longer present at the destination 

message: Including these weight classes kind of raises questions that aren't really addressed anywhere in the article. I know that Chinkilla is an Ultra Heavyweight which should at least be mentioned in that sub-article, but has there been an existence of robots or competitions that involve the Hyper Heavyweight / Tonweight and Super Tonweight classes? If not I strongly feel it should be noted. 2603:7000:6A00:23F7:74C6:380D:50B2:4FBE (talk) 18:08, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hyper Heavyweights and above
Talk:Hounslow West tube station

message: You know, I made a point of taking a photo just in case there wasn't one as yet ... it's a pretty awful photo, so if anyone can get a better one please feel free! Best place to take a pic would, I think, be first floor of one of the shops on the opposite side of Bath Road. I think quite a good photograph is possible - David Gerard 00:34, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo
Talk:Barry

message: Barold?  I've never heard of such a name. 23:30, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Barold? 

message: I just rm a "Fictional characters" section with:
* Barry Trotter, a parody of Harry Potter
* Barry Scott subject of Cillit Bang advertisements in the UK
* Barry Evans a fictional character in the soap Eastenders
* Barry Burton a supporting character in the Resident Evil series
Any of these entries should go into the main page again ONLY if the character is known as just Barry. Otherwise they have no place in a dab page about the single word Barry. --maf 22:44, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section removed
Talk:Deuce (song)

message: Is this cleaned up enough? GeorgeC 00:39, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:11th Marine Expeditionary Unit

message: I remeber the last location of the unit in 2003 was in Al-Hilla as my cousin was stationed before he returned.--Max Mayr 15:05, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2003  

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class.  Referencing and appropriate inline citation guidelines not met.    --dashiellx (talk) 18:00, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008
Talk:New Guardians

message: how can the new guardians pass on their genes to the next race by having kids, if they have a gay member.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.83.150.156 (talk) 14:48, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Errors
Talk:Measurement system analysis

message: According to my training and also the sources I can find online, the title of this article should be "measurement system analysis". That is: analysis of the measurement system being used in the given Six Sigma project, not the analysis of a bunch of options as to what measurement systems could be used in theory. 13:12, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Nobody objects - I'm going ahead JanCeuleers (talk) 13:54, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should be "measurement system analysis" (singular)
Talk:Francis Cammaerts

message: Thanks to all who have worked on this article. Capitalistroadster 01:02, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've responded to the header message and made substantial additions to the in-line referencing to this article. This added 1 December 2019 by User:Nihil_novi. I believe this has been enough to enable me to remove the header.
Editors, please review these changes. In the course of doing this I've also added additional information in a few places. 
Best Bob (talk) 15:09, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Extensive referencing
Talk:Cirrocumulus cloud

message: Atmospheric dynamics and wind patterns also contribute to the formation of the distinct cloudlet structure. The cirrocumulus cloudlets are often aligned with the prevailing wind direction and are regularly spaced due to the vertical wind shear present in the upper atmosphere. This shear causes variations in wind speed and direction at different altitudes, leading to the development of separate cloudlets rather than a continuous cloud formation.
Does anyone have a good citation for this effect that we could add to the article? I thought it was pretty interesting if true.
--Meekohi (talk) 16:40, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Effect of high altitude wind shear on cloudlet formation? 

message: That sure doesn't look like cirrocumulus; looks like altocumulus.  There's  be a better image out there.   The box dimensions need to be adjusted  of the info is showing up.  My wikiskills and time aren't up to that yet.  Tmangray 22:38, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed infobox (parse altitude data to "new" fields, add other infobox data). Dddstone 23:19, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image
Talk:VFA-115

message: VA-115 (U.S. Navy) should be merged into VFA-115 as they are one and the same squadron, and the period covered by VA-115 is also covered in VFA-115. Josh (talk) 23:44, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed and  Klbrain (talk) 23:11, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:EasyCruise

message: ...and use of a maid service who needs it during the stay but will incur an additional charge.
This doesn't make sense to me, I'm not sure if it means you have to pay for maid service in your room (I've been on a cruise, never seen it before, except for the high end cabins), or you something else.  The sentence needs rewriting. - MSTCrow 01:14, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi , the sentence means that while onboard the ship, you can pay to get your room cleaned. The rooms are always leaned after each guest disembarks. Hope that makes sense! 
Daylen (talk) 20:49, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Maid Service

message: I have removed the paragraph titled Controversy that details an unsuccessful challenge of manslaughter against a completely different company. It does not belong here! StephP 10:10, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Oil Tanker
Talk:Kentucky Route 44

message: Length by county, in miles. Progression is from west to east.
Jefferson	
*0.558
Bullitt  	
*26.286
Spencer  	
*19.063
Shelby   	
*10.398
Anderson 	
*13.888
Source:  --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 03:04, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Length notes
Talk:Kamay Botany Bay National Park

message: Much of this article's text was copied directly from a single source (https://apps.environment.nsw.gov.au/dpcheritageapp/ViewHeritageItemDetails.aspx?ID=5061543). Note especially the "Heritage Listing" section. I believe this is copyright infringement (despite frequent inline citations), since this source claims copyright of this information. Also, it's awkward to read. In-text attribution does not seem a practical solution.
To fix: article needs extensive rewriting to consolidate or remove copied text. Jayowyn (talk) 21:53, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copypasted from single source
Talk:Święty Krzyż Voivodship

message: This redirect is listed as both an alternate name and a misspelling. Is that correct? If so, what's the correct spelling? Wmahan. 01:21, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The spelling is correct but the name of the voivodship itelf is incorrect. --Lysytalk 05:37, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Smalleye squaretail

message: This article was based on the corresponding section in Ayling's Collins Guide to the Sea Fishes of New Zealand, and/or corresponding articles at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, none of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 08:49, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Golden-crowned warbler

message: Sabine's Sunbird  talk 01:32, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

message: :Second time this image has turned up here! jimfbleak 05:09, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It turned up again! Sabine's Sunbird  talk 17:54, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Weever

message: An anonymous editor added information suggesting that people have been known to cut off extremities which have been stung to relieve pain - quite frankly I find this ludicrous. I live in a popular tourist resort on the coast of Cornwall and have personally observed the results of weever stings and though nasty they are not *that* bad. But, I thought it should be left in since it is useful to debunk this sort of fallacy in an article. Trewornan 06:26, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I added the part about lifeguards but when I said they "deal with stings" on a daily basis I didn't intend to suggest that they get stung themselves that often. In any case I've removed it.Trewornan (talk) 03:02, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

message: Someone removed Weaverfish and put Justin Mathews in it's place. Any ideas why??  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.100.140.205 (talk) 00:08, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Justin Mathews
Talk:Cutlassfish

message: 69.22.242.15 (talk) 00:16, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add a section about use as food? 
Talk:Largehead hairtail

message: Please, mention the two subspecies of this fish eaten in Portugal. Namelly, the black variety is very common around the black seabed of Madeira.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.169.58.203 (talk) 19:07, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: That's the black scabbardfish, which is related (and somewhat similar in shape) to the largehead hairtail. 62.107.216.186 (talk) 13:49, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Black variety in Portugal
Talk:Kirsty MacColl discography

message: It isn't. Would it not be better to write the whole article, rather than just a line describing it, before publishing the article? J Milburn 01:33, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: yes more info is needed at the top of this page. OliverRoads (talk) 13:27, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

message: A page needs to be created on this new box set coming out this ocotober. OliverRoads (talk) 13:26, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  See that Girl box set... 

message: Need a page on this release. OliverRoads (talk) 13:27, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other People's Hearts (B.Sides 1988-1989)
Talk:Common triplefin

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --– Sadalmelik ☎ 08:13, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Mottled triplefin

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 05:03, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:New Zealand topknot

message: This article was based on the corresponding section in Ayling's Collins Guide to the Sea Fishes of New Zealand, and/or corresponding articles at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, none of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 00:55, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Scaly-headed triplefin

message: This article was based on the corresponding section in Ayling's Collins Guide to the Sea Fishes of New Zealand, and/or corresponding articles at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, none of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 04:05, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Bellapiscis medius

message: This article was based on the corresponding section in Ayling's Collins Guide to the Sea Fishes of New Zealand, and/or corresponding articles at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, none of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 03:27, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed