lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:OSType

message: FourCC and OSType are not the same thing, as OSType does not exist on non-Macintosh platforms, and FourCC is encoded into AVI files in a different place than OSType.  Merging FourCC with this was a mistake.  – Andyluciano 19:11, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If they need separate articles, then they are different enough that the first sentence of this article should not claim they are synonyms. Fixed. --68.0.124.33 (talk) 00:20, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Macintosh bias: FourCC should be un-merged
Category talk:Wikipedia sockpuppets

message: I suspect Parav and Robin klein are sock puppets of Mar Thoma.86.138.184.113 22:48, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: earlier comments

message: I would love to see a list of the top twenty sockpuppeteers! There's been a case of a bloke who had 50 (!) sockpuppets in one of the articles I looked at. I really expected him to be in the top ten for employment of misdirected energies and time, but by golly some people have given him an arse-whupping in this list. One case with more than 400 socks! I don't even have that many socks in my bloody drawers...! Trigaranus (talk) 12:00, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ranking
Talk:Venskus

message: Why does my article have that paragraph at the bottom? Can I get it taken off? I didn't add it, and it doesn't have anything to do with the European resort I visited last summer. Why can't I edit my article back to the way its supposed to look?
:First, it's not "your" article. Once you submitted it to Wikipedia, it became the community's article. Second, that paragraph looks like it's on its way out, unless verifiable sources are produced. Third, you can't edit it because it's protected. I intend to unprotect soon. Hermione1980 14:25, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't mean to imply ownership, I apologize.
*source needed for the Project Venskus section, it looks a lot like the deleted vanity page from last week 
**(Anon preceded to make personal attacks and allegations against Reid A. I have removed them per WP:RPA. Hermione1980 17:48, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

text: sources for the Project Venskus are at www.ufck.org and www.omletteville.org -Reid A. 23:21, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: i see nothing related to Venskus on either website
Unless I see some more credible sources for this pretty soon, I'm going to unprotect and delete the section. Hermione1980 18:03, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Old talk

message: So far absolutely no verification has been given as to the information on Project Venskus. A cursory search on google reveals nothing. I suggest that the information be removed in seven days, on 24th December, if no verification is forthcoming. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Venskus--File Éireann 00:03, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds reasonable to me. Hermione1980 00:12, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Verify 

message: http://www.omletteville.org/ does not exist.
*-It did until It was referenced here-Reid A. 01:33, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Try doing a google search within the site, eg "project venskus site:ufck.org". Hermione1980 14:25, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Insufficient sources 

message: the information reposted from article dleted by Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Venskus is speedily deleted according to WP:CSD. Also, it belongs to the title  Project Venskus, not Venskus, since these are totally different topics. mikka (t) 21:56, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy deletion

message: Protection removed. 
User:reid: you are violating wikipedia policies: about deleted articles and about 3-revert rule. You may be blocked from editing for this. mikka (t) 21:58, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Protection removed
Talk:Pozzo (Waiting for Godot)

message: Where is a Steinway piano mentioned?
:The Steinway appears in later versions of the English translation, as well as the original German version. He says it right after claiming he left his watch at his manor, "on the Steinway".
:-Yossarian 05:44, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: That Pozzo could be Godot is mentioned not only by critics. I think the first instance of this is by Estragon in the second act.--24.131.209.132 03:30, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The 'Who is Pozzo?' section
Talk:Contrabass saxophone

message: How much does it weigh? 68.143.166.174 11:23, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weight 

message: I've heard that running a rubber glove up and down this instrument is originally how Godzilla's roar was created. If anyone can cite it, that should be added. --—Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.122.63.142 (talk • contribs) 
:Well, the creator of Godzilla's roar, Akira Ifukube, allegedly said the following: "I loosened the strings of a contrabass and pulled them with resin coated leather gloves. We slowed the speed and tried other things." (From this link.) So, while it doesn't belong here, it might be included in the article on double bass. ---Sluzzelin talk 19:04, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Godzilla
Template talk:WWIISovietAFVs

message: Added information on SU-14 which were produced in 2 exemplairs and on experimental SPG T-100-U which (1 exemplair) participated in fighting against Germans from closed positions in Kubinka.--Nixer 15:07, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some additions 

message: Yes it is not perfect. Better we should create a section "light tanks" and put sub-sections into it (but I dont know how to do this technically in the template). By the way, ACs also can be separated into light, medium and heavy (according to a list on one of Russian sites). 
Second, I did not mean "English-language terminology", but British classification. It was popular in the USSR some time before the war. There was also a German scheme, in which German "medium tanks" were the same class by their properties with Soviet "light tanks", German "heavy tanks" were actually the same class with Soviet "medium tanks" and German "super-heavy tanks" were actually in accord with Soviet heavy tanks.--Nixer 23:09, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Light tanks/terminology 

message: There's a new version for this template:Template:WWIISovietAFVS01.
Its already been posted on the Milhist Talk page and received no unfavourable criticism, so I'll be implementing the changes soon, if thats OK with everyone.
Raoulduke47 11:42, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  New version 

message: Why T-80 has a link to T-70? Is it a bug? Why is this template protected? Miraceti 09:44, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's protected because it is transcluded in a featured article. Apparently it will be unprotected shortly. GregorB 20:31, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

text: If it is a 'very different" T-80, it needs to be explained to avoid confusion. Currently, there are two links to T-70. Solarapex 23:35, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bug? T-80 

message: Shouldn't the Lend and Lease-Tanks providede by the US and the Uk added to that template? --Modgamers (talk) 10:03, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lend-and-Lease
Talk:Jerry Jeff Walker

message: if he was born ronald crosby, how did he come to call himself jerry jeff walker? can anyone shed light on this?--Alhutch 05:43, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know, but the 1967 album Circus Maximus (first album by the band of the same name) credits him as "Jerry Walker"; their next album, Neverland Revisited (1968) credits him as "Jerry Jeff Walker". - Jmabel | Talk 05:18, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  name 

message: Walker once appeared on The Tonight Show with Jay Leno. Leno opened his scrapbook to a poster showing Leno as opening act for Walker. Then he told Walker he did not get paid and had to hitchhike home because Walker failed to appear.
:Would you folks please "sign" and/or at least date stamp these tidbits?  Some of us like to know when the comment was made.  Thanks!  73.6.96.168 (talk) 09:31, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tonight Show 

message: Does anyone know what happened to Bob Bruno from Circus Maximus? He and Walker wrote most or all of the songs on their two LPs, but Bruno seemed to have dropped out of sight after their second album? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.72.105.146 (talk) 20:53, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bob Bruno 

message: I don't think country fits Jerry Jeff. I know that these labels are just marketing devices and don't represent anything technical about the music and I don't find "country" at all perjorative but I don't think many people think of him as country. Many country fans I know like his stuff but, like me, they don't categorize him that way. If anything, he's a folk musician, much as that particular label has been twisted and bent. 65.79.173.135 (talk) 15:37, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Country Musician 

message: Is it just me, or does much of this sound like a press release? It's also thin on references for an article of its length. Dgndenver (talk) 07:23, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: There is nothing new or unusual about the tone of this article.  If anything, it's lacking.  Compared to most other major artists, this article is very sparse and modest.  73.6.96.168 (talk) 09:32, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overall tone 
Talk:Henry W. Coe State Park

message: Regarding the merging of Henry Willard Coe, Jr. into the article on Henry W. Coe State Park, I think they should be left seperate, especially if someone can expand on the Henry Willard Coe, Jr. article. He's mentioned in the opening paragraph of the Henry W. Coe State Park article and I don't believe he needs to be discussed in further detail regarding the park's natural history, geography, climate, etc. al. A page dedicated solely to Henry Willard Coe, Jr. would allow a more expansive article on his life to be presented.
:True, this article probably isn't the best place for biographical info on Henry Coe. But is he deserving of a separate article at all? Is he notable for anything other than having a park named after him? -- Scott eiπ 07:46, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging articles 

message: Can anything be said about the state of cattle grazing in the park? I've encountered cows there, but I've heard nothing about it. -- Scott eiπ 07:49, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think they're not supposed to be there, but the rangelands in that part of the Diablo Range are often unfenced, with the narrow canyons and waterholes working to naturally limit the range of cattle on surrounding ranches.  A few steers may wander into the park from time to time. —QuicksilverT @ 15:13, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cattle grazing in park 

message: Why on earth is there a warning saying this article shows "how to" information?  I don't see it. -- Alan  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alandbrown (talk • contribs) 05:21, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  Some Wikipedians seem to love dribbling annoying warning tags all over the project, lacking the ability to make meaningful contributions themselves.  I've removed it. —QuicksilverT @ 15:13, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overtagging 

message: * At the end of the History section, please add the following information:
** Poverty Flat Site is a prehistoric village site located on the north and southern banks of the Coyote Creek, in Henry W. Coe State Park. The site contains fire-fractured rocks, human bone, as well as chips and flakes of obsidian mixed with chert. Poverty Flat Site was listed on the National Register of Historic Places on February 23, 1972.
 Greg Henderson (talk) 21:47, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit Request - Poverty Flat Site
Talk:Gōjū-ryū

message: Dear editors, I am proposing a new WikiProject Karate to bring together editors with knowledge of this martial art specifically, especially due to Karate becoming an Olympic sport I think it is time to focus energy on the roughly 3500 main space articles associated with Karate. Full description of the rationale and goals can be found at the link above, please comment, discuss (and join if you support this project!) All the best, Mountaincirque 10:18, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Karate Proposal at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Wikipedia:WikiProject Karate]]  

message: I've been prompted to remove some information by a recent edit in which the order of the kata was changed. They didn't appear to be any particular order either before or after the change but I'm sure someone will enlighten me. In any event, as the kata are all named below, I didn't see the point in repeating the information.--Ykraps (talk) 07:37, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edits Comment
Template talk:Patent law

message: First, I'm not doubting its significance, but I think it's only 1/2 the reason it should be on the template.  I'm wondering if there's a concept which might better target what this is meant to capture: the public's benefit from the patent law bargain.  Of course, that's not a very good name, but I think that that's the point.  We want an article which sort of covers the significance to the public of HAVING a patent law at all.  Is the only benefit really the sufficiency of the disclosure?  Or is it the i) disclore, ii) commercialization... (brain freeze, studying for Religion and the Constitution)... whatever else is out there? mmmbeerT / C / ? 23:32, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Sufficiency of the disclosure

message: A TFD on  was recently closed, agreeing in a merge to this template.  Are there any ideas here for which links should be included (I have no idea about patent law!).  You can see an earlier revision here.  Thanks Martinp23 19:49, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  TfD result 

message: I propose adding a link to patentleft. Or would that be against the rules because it's currently a "stub"? It seems like a very important concept that should be given more attention, in any case.
ArtifexCrastinus (talk) 05:02, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for your proposal. It's not a problem that the article is currently a stub. However, I would not add it to the template :Template:Patent law as patentleft is one particular way to license patents (and licensing is already in the template). But let's create a new template :Template:Licensing of patents! Here it is... --Edcolins (talk) 17:56, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition: Patentleft 

message: Hello anyone watching this template.  I changed the word "processes" in one of the info sub-boxes to "basic concepts".  The word "processes" also has a term of art meaning, i.e. methods.  So "basic concepts" seemed to be less confusing.  I look forward to any input on this - I am American and so my english might differ from others.Saltwolf (talk) 16:37, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the edit. Good point. I agree that the title "processes" was confusing. "Basic concepts" is fine but somewhat still confusing to me since let's say the concept of "novelty" is also a basic concept of patent law. What about "Basic stages", "Legal phases" or the like? --Edcolins (talk) 20:34, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing patent law template
Template talk:The Clash

message: I have decided to remove the pictures of the band members because to begin with, they were not very good pictures... and also This is not permitted under Wikipedia's policy on "fair use". See Wikipedia:Fair use, in particular the parts about not using non-free images for decoration, and not using non-free images outside of individual articles. IAMTHEEGGMANtalk 23:41, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed pictures

message: I am removing the tags after these as they ae not accurate. Guinnog 18:45, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: London Calling and Sandinista!

message: why are the libertines on the template?
76.119.232.174 (talk) 19:51, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They aren't. --John (talk) 19:57, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They reappeared again earlier this year - I have taken them out again. -- Beardo (talk) 23:45, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: The Libertines

message: A lot of the related articles are groups whose only link is that one of the members of the Clash was in the other group - that seems too loose a connection to me. We already have links to the articles about the members - if someone wants to follow their careers they can go there. -- Beardo (talk) 19:42, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Related articles
Talk:Tula Arms Plant

message: I have searched for articles on the Tula Arsenal but have come up with little info. There is a lot of info on the weapons manufactured there, but almost nothing I could find on the arsenal itself. So this is a stub written by me.--Cerejota 23:56, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Is KBP Instrument Design Bureau (located in Tula) the Soviet name for Tula Arsenal, or are they two separate weapons manufacturers in the same city? If it's the former, that might be why you're not finding much info under the "Tula Arsenal" name. — Red XIV (talk) 00:49, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

text: A lot of the information regarding this plant is under it's Russian name; Tulsky oruzheiny zavod (TOZ). Jonathen snake (talk) 13:55, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes, the Tula weapon factory is still working and TOZ is the trade mark. 91.155.110.111 (talk) 21:55, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Web searches give up little

message: I added their current logo (from their website).  I'm also hoping someone will be kind enough to add in the Tula stamp that they put on their weapons during WWII (5-pointed star with and arrow; example found  here.  A vectorized SVG would be awesome; this is an important part of the history of the plant.Faceless Enemy (talk) 00:59, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Logos and whatnot

message: I propose the TOZ-106 article be merged here as it does not seem to warrant it`s own article. Darkness Shines (talk) 15:08, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Strong Oppose.  Typically, manufacturers who make a variety of products and the products in question are not merged.  See: Glock vs. Glock Ges.m.b.H., SIG Sauer vs. the whole list of products on its page, Smith & Wesson versus its various products, etc. etc. etc.  Faceless Enemy (talk) 04:32, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: Reading an article on the Nagant repeating pistol, model of 1895 (Rus. револьвер системы Нагана образца 1895 года), in the Stanley Harris magazine Military Surplus, Volume 2, I came across a headline photograph of the same that shows that several Cyrillic letters were split up in ways not provided for in the coding of software used to support articles on the Web.  In the spelling of the Russian "Tul'skyy Oruzh. Zavod'," the "ы" is split and a hard palatization is used on "zavod'":
:Тульскій Оруж. Заводъ
Which leads me to believe "Тульский оружейный заводъ" correct as of 2013.  B. C. Schmerker (talk) 20:58, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note on a naming convention in the original Russian 

message: "From the early 1980s, the factory continued to produce the AK-47"
Since it's an unsourced paragraph, I imagine the author meant to say AKM and not AK-47.
Should this be changed?
Thom430 (talk) 11:10, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  AK-47 production into the 1980s?
Talk:Moscow Aircraft Production Association

message: Alright I'm no historian of aviation but I've gathered this much information from books and online. Alot of the links to non-existing wiki articles can probably be fixed if someone knows what the real names of these companies are because the transliterations of the cyrillic I dont think is very accurate. There is information floating about the wikipedia in about "Kamov is merging with Mil and Rostvertol to form Oboronprom Corp. in 2006." and i've found further information about a merger. seems some firms included within MAPO, the Mig section i think, will be merging with Sukhoi in 2006.Solidusspriggan 00:02, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tyler Christopher (actor)

message: WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 16:56, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: Unless and until Tyler Christopher confirms that he and Willis are a couple, there shouldn't be rumors about it in the Wikipedia articles. So far both actors have been adamant that they are not involved, and there is no way to verify the rumors that they are. D'Amico 00:04, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Alicia Leigh Willis Rumors

message: To the users who have been edit warrring in this article over the inclusion of Brienne Pedigo as Tyler Christopher's wife, please discuss your edits on the talk page here and obtain consensus, because reverting each other's changes for months without discussion and using sockpuppets to evade detection is not on. If you do not come to an agreement here, the article will remain protected. Somno (talk) 09:16, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit warring
Talk:The Book of Three

message: I wouldn't define Gurgi as a "man-beast". I think most people would interpet him as being humanoidal, but not human. 67.33.129.48 (talk) at 00:06, 18 December 2005
:Actually, Gurgi is never referred to anything except "the creature" or "the Gurgi." He isn't described as having particularly anthropomorphic attributes. I don't know where "man-beast" came from, but I believe it should be altered. Oh, and does the article still count as a stub? Hrkool 05:50, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed to say "humanoid creature" instead of "man-beast". Amalas 15:16, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well he can talk and walk but he isnt smart or anything so he is a huminoid 72.72.118.203 (talk) at 16:17, 31 July 2007
Gurgi, GHER-ghee, is listed in the Prydain Pronunciation Guide, 1999 expanded edition of The Foundling and Other Tales of Prydain‎. --P64 (talk) 16:20, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Gurgi

message: Found picture of first edition cover here along with The Black Cauldron. --Glimmer721 talk 01:34, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: First edition cover

message: :"This is the only time in the series that the companions visit the realm of the Fair Folk, or that Eilonwy attempts sorcery of any kind."
This pair of observations was in the lead paragraph. The matter certainly belongs in coverage of the Fair Folk and Eilonwy, and may somehow belong in this article. --P64 (talk) 16:13, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Uniqueness notes
Talk:Larry Parr (chess player)

message: Several unsubstantiated claims in this article by convicted  felon Sam Sloan.  Disclosure: I have less-than-cordial relations with both author and subject.  NPOV edit should be made by others. Billbrock 00:07, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "Larry Parr is a former editor of Chess Life and he has received more individual awards from the Chess Journalists of America than any other chess writer in its history. These exclusive articles provide fascinating details and inside information about the World Chess Championship."
The formatting suggests, it is a quote. By whom, and which is the source? Rook wave 00:47, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quote about Larry Parr 
Talk:Tour d'Afrique

message: Robert 00:10, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  AFD result - keep 

message: Could we write that it is the toughest bicycle race? It is hard to prove it, but when searching which one it is, I find races that claim themselves to be the toughest, but are much shorter and on much better road quality. Especially the Race Across America (3010 miles) is called that. Tour de France is 2200 miles. Both on asphalt.--BIL (talk) 12:29, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The toughest bicycle race 

message: I plan to remove the infobox about Notability after I added one more secondary source. --BIL (talk) 20:19, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability infobox