lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Art Institute of Pittsburgh

message: Founded in 1921, AIP is the oldest and most storied of The Art Institutes throughout North America...
What about 
 The Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts is a museum and art school... It was founded in 1805 and is the oldest art museum and school in the US. 
Or even Moore College of Art and Design, founded 1848. Or even
 In 1876, the Pennsylvania Museum School of Industrial Art (PaMSIA) was founded as both a museum and an art school. 
This lede overstates its case, just in Pennsylvania I have cited three examples that are far older, and probably there are others. Someone should revise the lede, but perhaps I am too partisan an advocate of Philadelphia to do it. --DThomsen8 (talk) 20:08, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oldest and most storied? 

message: Editors interested in this article may find the Teaching with Wikipedia Workshop that will take place at CMU on Aug 15 of interest. This workshop is open to general public, and is a joint imitative of CMU and Pitt). There will be another workshop held at Pitt in the Fall as well. It will cover how to include Wikipedia in one's course  (WP:SUP) and also how to become a Wikipedia:Campus Ambassadors. Pennsylvania has currently only one ambassador (myself) and it would be great if we could recruit at least several more. Ambassadors help course instructors, showing them how Wikipedia works, and interact with students. Many current ambassadors come from the body of students, faculty and university staff; it is a fun adventure, and adds to one resume/CV, to boot :) If it sounds interesting, feel free to ask me any questions, or to come to the workshop. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  20:33, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Teaching with Wikipedia Workshop at CMU (Aug 15) 

message: While doing some miscellaneous tasks on Wikipedia, I ran across a dated "mergeto" suggestion on The Art Institute Online to merge that article into this one, Art Institute of Pittsburgh. From what I see, it seems like since The Art Institute Online is part of the Art Institute of Pittsburgh system, that is the reason why it should be merged. What do you think? Steel1943 (talk) 04:00, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: This article contains a lot of irrelevant and biased information about graduation rate in the intro. Is this why this school has a wiki page? Because it's notoriously bad? If not, could someone more familiar with the topic fix this to only add these facts to a "controversy" section or make this information less defining? 12 July 2018 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rexlikescheese (talk • contribs) 
: Feel free to edit this yourself. LittlePuppers (talk) 03:25, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biased 
Talk:Ground parrot

message: A copy of the local Leader newspaper mentioned this a couple of months ago. Today I spoke with someone who was involved with the rescue of the animal (as it was attacked by a cat). I am not sure if I still have the copy of that paper for reference, but if we can reference the info I guess this capture should be added to the article. The opening paragraphs which mention neither parrot being found in Sydney today are probably a good place to make the note. youcantryreachingme 08:04, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Ground Parrot found in Sydney (Malabar) in 2006

message: Need an expert to clarify whether P. w. leachi is a separate subspecies or part of P. w. wallicus. Nurg (talk) 01:59, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Status of P. w. leachi 

message: Someone needs to take a better photo to use as identification for this bird!
--Grapeman4 (talk) 09:41, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Latest thinking is it is probably not valid. Casliber (talk · contribs) 20:29, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Photo needed 
Talk:HSAB theory

message: In the theory section, it is given that "soft acids react faster and form stronger bonds with soft bases, whereas hard acids react faster and form stronger bonds with hard bases, all other factors being equal."I think there has to be some difference between hard and soft acids/bases as they have different charcteristics.--Karthick Ashwath (talk) 15:08, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Something amiss in theory section of the article

message: Dùng thuyết vân đạo biên để tìm hiểu thuyết acid base cứng mềm (HSAB):
Khi xét đến acid base cứng mềm, thì qui luật donor và acceptor phải được hiểu và xét một cách linh động. Khả năng donor (ta tưởng tượng như một base) càng dễ khi HOMO có năng luợng càng cao, nguợc lại, khả năng acceptor (ta tưởng tượng như một acid) càng mạnh khi LUMO có năng lượng càng thấp. Điều đó có nghĩa là nếu HOMO có năng lượng thấp cũng như LUMO có năng lượng cao đều khó donor và acceptor, không đúng !!!
Trước khi giải quyết chỗ không đúng này, ta hãy lượt qua một chút về priciple of hard and soft acids and bases:
Pearson là người đã khởi nguyên lí acids bases cứng mềm (HSAB), nội dung nguyên lí như sau:
Acid cứng thì có thể phản ứng tốt với base cứng, còn acid mềm có thể phản ứng tốt bới base mềm.
Ta quan sát table một số acid và base cứng mềm thông dụng:
 
fig: Một số acid base cứng mềm thông dụng
Using the theory of <??> to understand the Hard Soft Acid Base theory: When dealing with hard soft acid-bases, it is key that the workings of the donor and acceptor are well understood in a robust manner. The capacity of the donor (thought of as a base) becomes greater when the HOMO is of high energy, conversely, the capacity of the acceptor (thought of as an acid) becomes stronger when the LUMO is of lower energy. This has the meaning that if the HOMO is of low energy and LUMO is of high energy, then the donor-acceptance is difficult - but this is incorrect!!!
Before we explain this incorrectness, let us examine a little of the principles of HSABs: Pearson is the one who created the HSAB theory, based on the principle: Hard acids can react well with hard bases, amd soft acids with soft bases. The following is a table of common HSABs.  Blnguyen  (bananabucket) 03:53, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Is this Vietnamese? Can anyone translate it? I've taken the liberty of changing the broken image links into external links. —Keenan Pepper 20:17, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. I can do it if you want. Blnguyen  (bananabucket) 00:43, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That would be wonderful. --HappyCamper 03:11, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

text: Except that some technical terms I don't know - I've lived in Australia all my life, and the dictionary doesn't help. You know that HOMO = Highest Occupied Molecular orbital, LUMO = lowest unoccupied molecular orbital right? Blnguyen  (bananabucket) 03:45, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yup. --HappyCamper 17:08, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-English text, looks like Vietnamese
Talk:Chen Jianghua

message: Why is the neutrality of this article questioned? As the author of this article, I personally think I showed no bias, but maybe I'm wrong. Hanuab 08:05, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality
Talk:Mela Lee

message: Hear me out, is it really necessary for her role in Durarara!! and x2 to be listed twice? I think it's redundant and that x2 is just a continuation of the first season. Hugosworld92 (talk) 01:27, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not necessary, unless she's voicing a new character or the seasons are far apart. Recommend removing that and just add "series" to the original entry. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 01:30, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Durarara!! and x2
Talk:National Service Scheme

message: http://www.nss.nitc.ac.in (National Service Scheme Cell, NIT Calicut)
H RANJITDA (talk) 10:40, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Related Websites 
Talk:Rastislav of Moravia

message: A question regarding, "...exchange Rastislav for the promise that he would rule Great Moravia."    Who is he?
Thomas Graves 08:07, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have twice removed the link to a Russian disambiguation page (there is no Russian page for this person), and twice robots have restored it.  I won't bother removing it again, but can something be done about this? Languagehat (talk) 22:17, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Bad Robot Edit

message: I think it is clear that Rastislavs reign lasted from 846 to 870. Barford is the only one who suggests that it ends in 869. --Trimnapaschkan (talk) 11:49, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, you are right. Borsoka (talk) 12:47, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Reign
Talk:Art Tripp

message: The person here is actually Art Tripp III. Check in many references; and in the Captain Beefheart page, and you find others refer to him as Art Tripp III, not as Art Tripp. Suggest that folks discuss this and come to a consensus, while the article is barely started, and can be still re-named! --leahtwosaints (talk) 07:12, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should this article have a new title? 

message: This whole article reads like it was written by Art Tripp himself, and includes opinions and views that border on self-advertising. 82.181.39.239 (talk) 15:46, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, it was written by him, or someone connected with him. He also edits under yet another user name, so that's borderline sockpuppetry. However, he doesn't use peacock language, and most of stuff is about right--I'm familiar with the Mothers' story. So, I removed both of the links to his chiropractic practice, and will probably come back and edit out some more superfluous verbiage. But it's not his advert any more, and that's good. Tapered (talk) 22:43, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV? 
Talk:August Wilson African American Cultural Center

message: This article is grossly under reported. Under the subsection, Debt, there is no reference to the controversies that surrounded the complete mismanaging of foundation funds, which culminated in criminal charges being filed. In addition, the article lists Dollar Bank as the current owner, this is no longer the case. The current owners should be listed and should include their vision for the future of the center.Mentor321 (talk) 02:01, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Excellent suggestions. It is hard to keep Wikipedia current when stories are rapidly unfolding. Do you have some sources/citations to share? Aolivex (talk) 21:48, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Critique
Talk:Headspin (song)

message: Headspin is a song Written by Toronto based singer Lukas Rossi, and performed by the band "Rise Electric".
The song was performed on the hit CBS tv show, Rockstar: Supernova 3 times.
Do we know for a fact it's about his mother?
Iamandrewssoul 20:43, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

message: This page seems to be a waste.  I have never heard of this band--they appear to be some group of obscure Canadians.  I bet they put this page up themselves to generate "buzz" for their lame band.  Hey!  Let's take this page down!!!24.14.33.171 (talk) 18:58, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is it needed? 
Talk:Avonworth High School

message: if Lucas Zarzeczny doesn't already have his own wiki article, i wouldn't consider him notable alumni
(Lucas Zarzeczny, finished 1st in the 2006 PIAA Class AA Cross Country race.) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Vicapowell39 (talk • contribs).
:New comments go at the bottom of a talk page. – Paschmitts 03:46, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: BBC stands for big black cock, this mean that you have a Big Black Cock. If someone tells you, “ you have a BBC” it is a compliment, now go find some BBC and suck it like a big girl 👧 74.111.171.116 (talk) 22:15, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  BBC
Template talk:The Flaming Lips

message: I was wondering why those specific songs were chosen for inclusion in the template? They're all pretty recent but the selection seems pretty arbitrary.  Also, I'm fairly certain Kliph Scurlock isn't considered to be a full band member (e.g. he doesn't play on their albums).--Lairor 08:19, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Excellent points, we'll be looking into that. --Rajah 02:53, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

text: I've added all songs which currently have articles to the band's template. Moreover, Kliph Scurlock does play on their albums. See his article for the reference. --Rajah 00:26, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: His article only says that he is credited on their Fight Test EP, which includes live tracks, reinforcing my point that he doesn't play on their albums.  He isn't credited at all on Yoshimi and although I don't have it with me I believe he gets a "special thanks" credit on At War With the Mystics.--Lairor 23:32, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  If one were to go to the Flaming Lips' official website, click on the "Band" tab and then on the "People" tab, one could see that Scurlock is listed, apart from the 3 core band members on the "supporting cast" page.--Lairor 16:55, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Specific Songs and Kliph Scurlock

message: I don't think that belongs on there. The template is about the band, not about this project. --Rajah 05:11, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: removed Wikiproject link on template

message: I just wanted everyone to know that this new format is described as the standard format for band templates. The former style was unelegant and easily-broken. As you can tell, I have a few band templates under my belt so I wouldn't worry too much about my having messed up this new format (it's happened before, but I quickly made the necessary changes). →  ( • ) 20:38, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New format 

message: There are a number of releases from 2011 that aren't listed in this template: "Two Blobs Fucking," StroboTrip, etc. (there's a list here which I believe is complete).  I'm not sure what the guidelines are around what to include in Templates, so I thought I'd mention it here rather than adding them all myself. Jd4v15 (talk) 03:52, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  New releases 

message: Is "Dooo It!" worth including as an entry? The song is produced by The Flaming Lips. ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:06, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[Dooo It!]]" worth including?
Talk:Michael Christian

message: I removed this line: "On 4 December 2012, Michael Christian and co-host Mel Greig initiated a prank phone call to London's King Edward VII hospital resulting in the suicide death of a nurse later on 7 December 2012. As of 8 December 2012 he is still employed by Sydney’s 2Day FM."
The person of this entry doesn't seem the same Michael Christian who prank called the hospital. The DJ is much younger. See the pics: http://www.elitesports.com.au/talent/media/michael-christian/ and http://images.smh.com.au/2012/12/06/3867811/729hosts-620x349.jpg 77.249.13.147 (talk) 20:28, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, good catch. --Bongwarrior (talk) 20:48, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  This former footballer IS NOT the radio presenter from the royal prank call controversy. Thanks for protecting it. Might need a hatnote to make it clear. The-Pope (talk) 00:43, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Another Michael Christian
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Log/2006 September 17

message: PLz. DON'T DELETE Spinosaurus Vs Rex,cuz NRC needs affilates/allies.
We will do anything Wikipedia,ANYTHING
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by NRC ADMIN (talk • contribs) .
:You don't plead to keep articles on Wikipedia. They are here only if they belong here. --Nishkid64 18:56, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plz keep [[Spinosaurus Vs Rex]],'''DON"T DELETE IT'''
Talk:Bernard Punsly

message: Listing actors in that order is bizarre. It's not alphabetical, it's not chronological, it's not in terms of talent. No one would classify Reagan with the other four in acting terms.
Is this list political and a really oblique way of saying that Punsly was a Republican?
Because when Punsly acted with him, the flipflopper was still a Democrat.
Varlaam (talk) 17:45, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Reagan ... Bogart

message: The "Index Record for Bernard Punsly (1923) Veterans Affairs Beneficiary Identification Records Locator Subsystem Death File", a primary source, lists his military service dates as, Enlistment Dates: "5 Mar 1943" (Army Air Force) and "4 Dec 1950" (Air Force), and Release Dates: "17 Mar 1946" and "11 Sep 1952". However, I found no reliable sources as of yet that state he served from December 1950 to September 1952. Accordingly, this period of service was not included in the article until a reliable source (preferably secondary) is included. Semper Fi! FieldMarine (talk) 16:03, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Military service

message: Although Punsly served in the army during World War II, there are no reliable sources found as of yet that state he in a war zone. More specifically, the sources do not establish defining role in World War II. Accordingly, "Category:United States Army personnel of World War II" was removed until a defining role is established. Semper Fi! FieldMarine (talk) 16:28, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: World War II
Talk:Check constraint

message: Added links to this page from:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Update_%28SQL%29
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insert_%28SQL%29
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SQL-92
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtuoso_Universal_Server
This article currently has the following examples
:Some examples of dangerous constraints include:
:CHECK ((select count(*) from invoices where invoices.customerId = customerId) < 1000)
:CHECK (dateInserted = CURRENT_DATE)
:CHECK (countItems = RAND())
What is "dangerous" with these check constraints? --Abdull (talk) 15:34, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Remark

message: Why does this article refer to UNKNOWN?  In SQL 'unknown' is represented by NULL, so surely this should say NULL? 80.41.77.9 (talk) 11:13, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: UNKNOWN?
Talk:Roslyn School, Palmerston North

message: I'm not sure that this article is notable as per Wikipedia:Schools. Cordless Larry 08:47, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You are absolutely right (even if Wikipedia:Schools is no longer in effect). See new section below. --B. Wolterding 19:11, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: The notability of this school is currently not established.
Not all schools are notable enough to be included in Wikipedia. The applicable guidelines state as the primary criterion:
:"A company, corporation, organization, group, product, or service is notable if it has been the subject of secondary sources."
That is, there must be independent publications (newspaper articles, scientific work, or other reliable sources) about this school for it to be notable. Currently, no such sources are cited. In fact, notability is not even claimed; that is, the article does not even state what makes this school more notable than other schools.
Please add such sources to the article in the near future. Maybe there are relevant newspaper reports about the "No hurting school" concept, or other press coverage in a national paper?
I understand that a lot of work has been done on this article since the notability warning tag was placed in last September. I am resetting the date counter for now. However, if notability is not established, the article might be deleted from Wikipedia in the future.
Sorted as part of the Notability Wikiproject. --B. Wolterding 19:22, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please establish notability
Talk:Virginia State Route 38

message: I haven't figured out when the whole route was added, so here's what I can find, and what I have written:
*5 mi Morven to SR 13 at Tobaccoville 03-1923-02 21, 06-1923-01 7
*4 mi extension towards Amelia 02-1925-01 4
*1.1 mi extension, Amelia north 05-1926-01 19
*10.82 mi Amelia towards Namozine 08-1928-02 28
*Dinwiddie, 7.00 mi Sutherland towards Namozine 08-1928-02 28
*2 mi extension towards Namozine 08-1929-01 16
*5.91 mi extension towards Dinwiddie County 12-1930-02 10
*0.84? mi extension, Namozine towards Petersburg 07-1931-01 70
*4.39? mi extension towards Dinwiddie County 07-1932-03 18
Total mileage is 9.63 from Morven to Amelia, 7.03+3.01+13.48 mi east of Amelia in Amelia County, and 6.93 mi in Dinwiddie County. This adds up east of Amelia. --NE2 08:47, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: History
Talk:Little House on the Prairie T.V. Series

message: The title should read "Little House on the Prairie (TV series)" to be consistent with Wikipedia practices. I don't know the best/correct way to fix this. I think one uses "move," but I'm not certain and don't want to mess things up! Lawikitejana 08:48, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect title format
Talk:Francis Fox (civil engineer)

message: Especially in the light of the possible confusion referred to in the above section, the page move yesterday by User: The Traditionalist does not seem to me to be helpful (and it reverses a 2007 page move in the other direction). WP:NCPEER specifically allows 'Sir' in the page name as a disambiguator. GooglerW (talk) 09:26, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Certainly, but it is always a better idea to use the good ol′ brackets. After all, the policy says that it may be done, so you must find a specific reason for it. Bracket disambiguation is always the primary means of disambiguation and only if it is not applicable other means should be used. Ironically, the example article cited at NCPEER has been also moved.--The Traditionalist (talk) 12:32, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name
Talk:Ethnic Chinese in Brunei

message: Suryadinata uses both "Chinese Bruneian" and "Bruneian Chinese" interchangeably; while the US State Department used "Chinese Bruneian" on at least one occasion. However, the terms are not widely known in any other source. Informally, "Bruneian Chinese" seems to be the preferred name based on Google hits (mostly on personal webpages or forums where people describe their background). Neither term showed up in a Google News search on 2006 Sep 17.
Neither term is likely to be confused to mean "Bruneians in China" since said population is likely quite small and as far as I can tell, apparently has never even had a newspaper article written about them.
Hits for Chinese Bruneian:
* Google Scholar: 1
* Google Books: 3
* Google: 136
Hits for Bruneian Chinese
* Google Scholar: 1
* Google Books: 2
* Google: 647
Given the small number of hits even on Google for either term, please do not move this page to "Chinese Bruneian" or "Bruneian Chinese" without some justification involving citation from various reliable sources. Note that analogy to terms like British Chinese or Chinese American do not qualify as citation. Thank you. cab 08:57, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why this article is not called Chinese Bruneian nor Bruneian Chinese 

message: what citizenship do they get then if not brunei? i know the prc can be quite picky about who they give citizenship to, particularly those who cant prove they had a parent who was a prc citizen.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.105.36.29 (talk) 09:54, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  citizenship
Talk:Michael Johnson (Australian rules footballer)

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Mike Johnson (Louisiana politician) which is of relevance to this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. TarnishedPathtalk 23:55, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion in progress