lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Akwesasne Indians

message: https://www.indiantime.net/story/2023/03/02/sports/akwesasne-junior-b-lacrosse-team-announces-new-name/41769.html Turnerathomas (talk) 19:58, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Akwesasne Indians Change to Akwesasne Thunder
Talk:KNRK

message: Please refrain from removing verfiable encyclopedic information from this article.  If you feel that the information is presented in a biased or incorrect manner, please address your concerns here on the article's talk page so that everybody can work together and come to a consensus. --Billdorr 23:22, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Perhaps snide isn't the best word to use here but there certainly needs to be some sort of adjective in this spot. Their comments were very cruel, obnoxious and made light of the man's brutal death. I think snide is, perhaps, the most apt. If anything, what they did might even deserve a harsher description. Constablequackers (talk) 08:24, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Edits to the Marconi/Nick Berg Controversy section

message: Using the word snide adds a non-neutral analysis of the commentary that occurred in 2004. I think it should be removed to just say that there was commentary. Thoughts? ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs)  15:38, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  Perhaps snide isn't the best word to use here but there certainly needs to be some sort of adjective in this spot. Their comments were very cruel, obnoxious and made light of the man's brutal death. I think snide is, perhaps, the most apt. If anything, what they did might even deserve a harsher description. Constablequackers (talk) 08:24, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:NPOV|NPOV]]
Talk:Radiotelephone

message: Re this edit, after some searching, I was surprised to learn that "tit" is old British military slang for a push-button:  "A push-button. E.g."Come on, hurry! Push the tit, we're running out of time - fire evrything we've got at them!" [Orig. Military use]",  "To squeeze the tit is to fire a machine gun or press any small button.",  "Military slang - A button that is pushed to fire a gun or release a bomb." - LuckyLouie (talk) 02:09, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: That's probably valuable if you are a WW I Brit geezer but in the context of today's equipment, it's less than useful :) Not worth fighting about, however, so grab them titties if you like :)  116.231.75.71 (talk) 13:49, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  PTT switch Comment 

message: — Assignment last updated by Smiths23 (talk) 15:18, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Media Culture
Talk:M20 recoilless rifle

message: See also the M29 Weasel. Why? 172.190.8.128 (talk) 08:46, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the M29 Weasel page, the "M29C Type A" variant had a center mounted M20 as its armament.  I'll leave it, and add a note to the link explaining as such.  I'll also include a link to the M18 recoilless rifle, a smaller caliber model of the same era. Wingman4l7 (talk) 10:20, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  See also... 

message: I doubt, if HEAT range was 6.4 km - maybe HE. I have no precise sources, but effective HEAT range anti-tanks would be around 300-400 m. Pibwl ←« 08:56, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Range
Talk:Jesse Sheidlower

message: - Moved from Hippie (etymology). —Viriditas | Talk 04:41, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Ref for inclusion

message: I'm planning to do some expansion of this article.  I know Jesse Sheidlower in real life through the OED SF citations project; I mention it in case it could be seen as a conflict of interest. I'll only be adding material I can source properly. Mike Christie (talk - contribs -  library) 00:45, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Planning to work on this article and notice of possible COI
Talk:List of Blade Runner (franchise) characters

message: Roy Batty? Minor?172.201.26.87 14:29, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's cos none of them have enough information to get their own articles.  Joanna is the actress that played Zhora.  At the time, Joanna had a snake, so she used her own snake in the film. Not too sure about the marijuana bud, but if it can be cited...-Malkinann 20:37, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Disagreements

message: This article could really use images for each or at least most of the characters.  Nswinton\talk 14:26, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Images?

message: None of the replicants/andys are discussed in terms of the novelization ("Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?").    —Preceding unsigned comment added by Evilmoxie (talk • contribs) 08:59, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Book Vs Movie 

message: I added a bit about initial plans to represent Dr. Eldon Tyrell as a Replicant, but it was reverted because I cited an inappropriate reference. The reference is a YouTube video with interviews with people who actually worked on the movie. So the source is fine. If the contention is that it's an inappropriate thing to mention, I disagree because other character bios on here refer to alternatives.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Philosophistry (talk • contribs) 01:27, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: A YouTube video, whomever is in it, or its subject, is not an appropriate reference.  Please find another reference, from an appropriate and notable source, if you want to include that information. ---RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 02:13, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternative Character Development 

message: The text of the description of Gaff seems eerily similar to that found on BRmovie.com's website:
http://www.brmovie.com/Profiles/BR_Char_Gaff.htm  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.162.1.41 (talk) 19:13, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original Text? 

message: I find the section about Gaff highly suspect.  The origami figure he makes is a crane, not a chicken, and although he clearly does not like Deckard, there is no indication whatsoever that he considers him a coward.  There is a very simple explanation for his dislike: Gaff despises replicants, and he knows that Deckard is one, as evidenced by the origami unicorn he leaves outside Deckard's flat (indicating that he knows about Deckard's dream).  DES (talk) 19:45, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gaff 

message: This needs expansion with the major new property, Blade Runner: Black Lotus, which explains some of Niander Wallace's traits -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 08:17, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:SODOIT. Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:09, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Black Lotus
Talk:Chilean Air Force

message: After reading 
    and are seriously looking for an attack fighter role to go along with the F-16 to make 
    up the strongest, powerful and intimidating fighter tandem in South America.
I decided to remove
    to make up the strongest, powerful and intimidating fighter tandem in South America.
because the statement was unverifiable. Besides, I am chilean and I am unaware of this. If anyone has a source for this phrase, please accept my apologies and re-insert the sentence in the article. --_N_e_g_r_u_l_i_o 06:37, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weasel words / unverifiable statment 

message: Someone posted that Chile actually purchased more than 30 Eurofighter Typhoon fighters. I couldn't find news about this specific purchase.
According to several news sources, Chile is interested in acquiring these planes and there have been meetings between the Chilean AF commander in chief and certain european operators of the aforementioned aircraft but considering the fact the last purchase consisted in a very limited amount of F-16s --which are considerably cheaper than the Eurofighter aircraft--, which is, in total, priced in a value equivalent to all the current Chilean F-16 fleet combined, I realized that the claim was indeed unlikely and probably untruthful, so I removed it.
Retinoblastoma (talk) 03:10, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Post about 30+ Eurofighter Typhoon purchase 

message: The 15:29, 29 July 2010 Dave1185 version of this article is translated into Chinese Wikipedia.--Wing (talk) 13:31, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation into Chinese Wikipedia 

message: Should the Airbus A400M also be added to the Future aircraft section of the article since in 2005 a DOI (similar to the one of the KC-390?) was signed? Best regards, Get_It (talk) 23:57, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Future Aircraft: A400M 

message: The Chilean Air Force have 3 ex RAF E3D's one is a spare for parts 86.17.137.107 (talk) 19:49, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  E3D
Talk:International Software Testing Qualifications Board Certified Tester

message: Hello,
this is the translated version of the german site .
I need to adapt the american prices and the online syllabus.
As I see also the literature citation I need# to transform.
Will do so in 10 minutes.
My eyes needa little rest :-)
--Erkan Yilmaz 23:46, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: translation of german version

message: Hello 220.227.67.171, 
about your text: "However entire syllabus is not covered in the above mentioned books." (from 08:09, 13 November 2006)
:I moved the discussion point here, to discuss here first. The list of books is what is referrenced by ISTQB itself.
:A list of useful books is available in the english syllabus on page 40-42.
:Since CTAL uses also CTFL-knowledge and is more practical you can find more info there.
:Veenendaal and Spillner 2005 are referred as extended reading.
:There is no doubt, that there are many books which are good.
:So, which books you also would referr?
:Why not discuss here?
:CU soon, --Erkan Yilmaz 21:32, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: text removed: "However entire syllabus is not covered in the above mentioned books."

message: I just did a lot of cleanup, the text seemed very 'translated', so I tried to just make it more natural sounding.
I don't think I actually changed the meaning of anything - if anyone disagrees let me know. Jtowler (talk) 11:26, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup
Talk:Nordea Bank Polska

message: The corresponding article in the Polish Wikipedia was deleted as an advertisement and as POV.
*01:28, 30 wrz 2006 TOR (Dyskusja | edycje) usunięto "Nordea Bank Polska" (EK - reklama, POV) --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 23:50, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Polish article deleted
Talk:Soul Food (TV series)

message: oh my god malinda rocked in soul food series. i am such a huge fan of the show. i am now looking to find where i can purchase the whole collection  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.75.88.176 (talk) 06:34, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  malinda
Talk:Gustavo Leigh

message: Is the reference to lobbying by nazis and extreme right fair or accurate? Leigh was neither extreme right nor a nazi, and i doubt that it was just those tiny groups who would have opposed his facing charges.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.197.15.138 (talk) 03:11, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lobbying by nazis and extreme right?
Talk:Pool Malebo

message: I looks like a meteor crashed into the earth at Malebo Pool.  The feature may be an impact crater.  00:08, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What is the reason for the depression? Some old impact craters on Earth have a ring, filled with water. For example Manicouagan and Siljan. A structure on Mars, similar to the Pool Malebo, is shown here: HRSCview data explorer. -- Zumthie (talk) 22:15, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Dear Deidre

message: NPOV: "Problems are probably made up" seems a rather biased opinion. So, too, "semi-serious". This doesn't necessarily reflect consensus. 62.30.77.61 00:16, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. I don't think the problems are made up. I might change it later. — AnemoneProjectors (talk) 09:57, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

text: I personally don't read Dear Deidre, but I think claiming that the problems are mostly fake is a pretty serious allegation. Therefore, I am removing the majority of the second paragraph from the article. By the way, Wikipedia is based on facts, not personal opinion. — AnemoneProjectors (talk) 21:22, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

text: Being bold is a good thing. Original research is a bad thing. — AnemoneProjectors (talk) 10:52, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

text: Well, at least you tried to find sources. However, those reviews are still based on personal opinion. Saying that the problems are made up, without proper citations, is potentially libelous. — AnemoneProjectors (talk) 12:16, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

text: Whether or not you claim to know a fact is irrelevant. However, I'm willing to revert my edit (and reword as necessary) as you have provided a link to the Wikipedia definition of an opinion. By the way, reading today's problems doesn't make me think it's not entirely genuine... I hope this dispute is now resolved. Thanks for a great debate. — AnemoneProjectors (talk) 18:51, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK thanks for that. I think your rewording has improved the POV. Interesting debate, I learnt a lot about WP policies :) --Hopex 19:20, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
MediaWiki talk:Nextn

message: Unfortunately, we can't rename these to "earlier" and "later" since they are also used in Category listings, which are not chronological.  See Bugzilla:4777 and Bugzilla:5310 — Omegatron 00:20, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: (I fixed the links in Omegatron's comment above.) --ais523 16:35, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "Earlier"/"later"?
Talk:Congolese Air Force

message: A short erly 2007 convisation was archived.--86.25.54.31 (talk) 22:38, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Archive

message: I've just seen in the Times a few days back a report that said all the MiG 15's were scrapped in 1988 and 1989. --86.25.49.183 (talk) 00:30, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They were scraped.--86.25.51.206 (talk) 17:11, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: MiGs

message: An Ilyushin IL-76 in Congolese markings was seen in January landing troops from the Republic of the Congo (Brazzaville) as part of the force which intervened in the Central African Republic. The photos can be viewed on www.militaryphotos.net on page 62.SASH155 (talk) 02:14, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  IL-76 transport in Republic of Congo (Congo Brazzaville) markings seen landing Congolese troops in Bangui, CAR
Talk:Alypius of Alexandria

message: I think the name of this page should be changed to "Alypius of Alexandria", since there is no evidence that Alypius was a writer of music. This would match the other pages about Alypius of Antioch, Alypius of Byzantium, Alypius of Thagaste, etc. Alternatively, it could be "Alypius (writer on music)". But the first is better. Kanjuzi (talk) 11:06, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur. "Music writer" is an odd locution, to start with. In my experience, it is a typewriter adapted to music symbols by Cecil Effinger or, spelled as MusicWriter, to a company marketing MIDI-based notation software. Secondarily, this links to a disambiguation page on Wikipedia where neither of these is mentioned, but offers five different meanings, only one of which applies to this particular Alypius.—Jerome Kohl (talk) 22:32, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I have boldly changed the title, since this does not seem to be controversial. If anyone disagrees, I am sure they will not hesitate to say so.—Jerome Kohl (talk) 22:43, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:Blanche of Lancaster

message: The dutch have written alot about Blanche, more than we have, they must have someone over there who is an expert on Blanche of Lancaster.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.31.204.166 (talk) 19:55, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other countries with this article 

message: Can anyone justify the "Lady and the Unicorn" image used at the top of this article? It's certainly not of Blanche, and, beyond showing an idealised medieval lady, has very little to do with her: wrong country, and over a century after her death. I think it should be removed. GrindtXX (talk) 14:21, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree as it's very misleading and has nothing to do with her whatsoever. It reminds me of an image chosen to illustrate a book cover just to make it attractive.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 17:11, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: No votes for keeping it: I'm taking it out. GrindtXX (talk) 17:16, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been tagged as probably Blanche of Lancaster. It would be nice to maybe have it in a section which discusses whether or not it is her, but it's not necessarily needed. As for pictures/portraits of her; there is probably only one; her grave that was destroyed. Perhaps that could be put up within the article. Is there an upload of that on Wiki? -- Lady Meg (talk) 23:24, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Why not try on Commons? Perhaps it's over there. I agree an image of Blanche-even her grave would enhance the article.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 12:59, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The Lady and the Unicorn is not likely to be based on Blanche as the tapestry (which is Flemish) dates from the late 15th century, well over 100 years after Blanche's death. Have you sources that claim it was based on her? If so add the section to the article.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 08:39, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I've now added an image of the tomb, but it isn't suitable as a 'portrait':– quite apart from the fact that Blanche is quite a small element of it, it's notoriously inaccurate in its details (it shows Blanche with a 'Tudor' style headdress, for example). The 1641 manuscript drawing by William Sedgwick on which it's based is a bit better, but I don't think there are any copyright-free versions of that around. GrindtXX (talk) 21:59, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image
Talk:Edmund Mortimer, 5th Earl of March

message: Strange, he should have been king over Bolingbroke. his claim is superior to Bolingbrokes, through Lionel, the second son of Edward II. Benkenobi18 (talk) 12:40, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: UKexpat, thanks for the Wikisource-inline edit. I didn't know how to do that. NinaGreen (talk) 16:47, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikisource-inline
Talk:Eleanor of Lancaster

message: The year of Eleanor's birth was changed from 1311 to 1318. Why was the year changed? Can someone please provide evidence to support the new date?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlwynJPie (talk • contribs) 13:30, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of birth 

message: The poem refers to the effigy figures as a "tomb", but the effigy figures are a "memorial", not a "tomb".  When the article refers specifically to the title of the poem, the word "tomb" must be used; however, the word "memorial" is more accurate when referring specifically to the stone effigies.  We cannot even be certain that the stone effigy figures are Richard FitzAlan, 10th Earl of Arundel, and his wife Eleanor of Lancaster. 
These pictures are not of a "tomb", but a "memorial".  Richard FitzAlan, 10th Earl of Arundel, and his wife Katherine Mortimer were not buried at Chichester Cathedral.  They are buried at Lewes Priory.  I contacted Chichester Cathedral to clear up the confusion.  (I had a source that cited Richard's will, stating burial at L)ewes.  Then there are these pictures and Wikipedia articles that show the Chichester effigies as being a "tomb".)  Below is the text of the email I received from Canon Dr Anthony Cane, Chancellor, Chichester Cathedral; Sent: 30 July 2014 10:46, via the Chichester Cathedral Education Officer. 
:"The Cathedral was severely damaged during the English Civil War.  In the nineteenth century the Cathedral had a number of monuments that had been vandalised or were badly decayed, and not necessarily in their original positions.  In 1843 the Dean and Chapter decided to have the ‘Arundel tomb’ restored.  The mutilated figures had been lying on tables against the north wall of the north aisle for two centuries.  They were then moved to their present position and restored.   This, I suggest, makes it most unlikely that there is any burial material there.  In any case, we do not know for certain who the figures are, as there is no contemporary attribution.   The date and features of the tomb make the attribution plausible, but not certain.
::Canon Dr Anthony Cane
::Chancellor, Chichester Cathedral"
--Ninanta (talk) 21:24, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distinction needs to be made:  Not a "tomb" but a "memorial"
Talk:List of companies of Scotland

message: Rather than finding ways to add to an already large list, should we start building the pages of Scottish Companies that don't appear to already have a Wikipedia article? 30/09/06
:Both! The list is very, very far from being comprehensive. --Mais oui! 06:52, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I did some article cleanup. I removed listings to redlinked/deleted articles. I also removed entries that were clearly WP:COI additions, and removed listings of external links per WP:EL and WP:NOTDIR. P. D. Cook Talk to me! 15:37, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup
Talk:Bremen-Vegesack

message: sorry, your refs pls ?
in farge, in blumenthal direct, in bremen city, at deschimag, finndorf missler neuenland ... and ... and ... serveral more
don't delete because "it is somply wrong" give me referneces please -- Sebastian scha. (talk) 07:47, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Sebastian ,sorry that I was mislead. The only relevant subcamp I thought of was the U-Boot-Bunker Valentin in Blumenthal (Rekum, to be precise), which was not only a shelter, but a building for site submarines, too. The subcamp you´ve mentioned existed as one of approx. 100 for Neuengamme, and being one of 1634 total, all figures according to the sources you´ve mentioned. So, my editing remark "It´s simply wrong" was wrong. But the reason why I was wrong is still there: the Vegesack subcamp was not at all as important as the Bunker camp was. For that reason, it doesn´t belong in the article. I should have put that on the talk page rather than reverting, that´s right, and has happened now. Greetings, --Joachim Weckermann (talk) 09:16, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Hi Joachim, I answered on your talk. It is very complicated  to find informations about these subcamps and severeal webpage are combining them at all. If I found more information (sources), I will expand it or delete the entry myself immediately. -- Sebastian scha. (talk) 09:51, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  camp 

message: Some 74 Type VII U-boats were built by the Bremer Vulkan shipyard at Vegesack. – Sca (talk) 14:29, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: WWII

message: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schulschiff_Deutschland some correction is needed (sorry...I am not sure HOW to do it): the ship has been transferred from Bremen-Vegesack to Bremerhaven...two or three years ago 2A02:8109:3B40:38C8:BAFD:9450:4FBE:50DA (talk) 15:16, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schulschiff_Deutschland
Talk:Finnish Border Guard

message: Finnish Border Guard is part of FDF, and FDF newer adopted G36 rifle, service rifle of border guards is Sako RK-95TP.
correct me if im wrong (i prefer not, after 12 years on border guards)
--81.209.127.10 (talk) 08:22, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Deleted the old photo. Newer Finnish Border Guard van:
http://www.intermin.fi/rvl/bulletin.nsf/bydate/DE8C80CDBFDD5015C225742C0045A09A/$file/RVL_auto.jpg
88.114.60.17 (talk) 00:27, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The reconnaissance patrol members are described as both "conscripts" and "volunteers" in the same sentence.  Which is it?  Conscripts are volunteers are, by definition, mutually exclusive.
173.32.76.120 (talk) 14:42, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conscripts vs volunteers 