Talk:The Fucking Cunts Treat Us Like Pricks

message: :Image:Fluxalbum.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 05:34, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added fair use rationale.--Michig (talk) 08:37, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Fluxalbum.jpg

message: I thought the album was called: "The Fucking Cunts Treat Us Like Pricks, The Fucking Pricks Treat Us Like Cunts" or that the two halves of the title were interchangeable. No RS for this (yet), just that "I was there". Tigerboy1966  12:55, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I wish I had been there. This article from Portuguese-language fanzine Cleópatra (2018) says disc 1 was titled The Fucking Cunts Treat Us Like Pricks and disc 2 was The Fucking Pricks Treat Us Like Cunts. That's not a RS but maybe someone has the album or a photo with the title/s? I think it's a pity that gender is so salient in the cover/title, but the Wikipedia article only mentions that it's about the sexual assault of a band member (without specifying genders) and doesn't say more about the lyrics or political intentions. From above fanzine article (my translation): this band achieved a very wide sound spectrum, even within a single album [which] makes use of sound collages from TV programs, conversations soundbites, loops that help to conceptually extend the album, because it's no longer just the instruments that make the music. [] The album was focused on exposing and denouncing 1980s misogyny in the UK and worldwide, but the band members thought that it's all more complex, that this patriarchal system results from a state that promotes war, media that manipulate information, religious fanaticism, capitalism, etc. The theme of sexual abuse and violence against women is central. At times the record makes you feel sick, both from the aggressive sound and from the horrible descriptions of rape cases and the victims themselves being exposed by police and courts and suffering veiled accusations [] But there are also references to [wars, The Sun, ecology, etc], issues addressed in a very pointed and explicit way.--95.208.211.114 (talk) 09:41, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Title