Talk:Euronews

message: RTE is listed as a founder, and later as one of those who joined SOCEMIE in 1997 along with the founders.  Obviously a small rewrite or correction of this section is needed, but I don't have the information needed --garryq 10:54, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  RTE, founder or no? 

message: What happened to this particular program?  Did EuroNews discontinue it? --  Denelson83  23:25, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good question. Do they air it only on weekends? I might be wrong but I can't find it on the EuroNews website anyway. --giandrea  23:31, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Only on weekends I believe.  84.192.117.13 16:06, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Perspectives 

message: Euronews was removed from the Canadian Bell ExpressVu service in April 2007. I've been unable to find a published citation for this, but as far as original research goes, I can turn on my receiver and confirm that this is true. ExpressVu has not yet updated its channel lineup file to reflect this change. Mike Doughney (talk) 20:08, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Availability 

message: It has been brought to my attention that some users have been continiously reverting content from an anonymous contributor, despite the fact that this user sourced his content.  I've examined his claims and the source he listed has indeed been used in the intro section of the article for nearly a year now.  That the source currently is not yielding a result isn't sufficient grounds for a full removal of this new content -- the website is clearly genuine and a reliable source, and I suggest we give it some time to correct this internal error it seems to be facing at present.  At any rate, I see no reason why this content should be removed.  DieOfGoodLuck (talk) 20:06, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow,what a coincidence. Rien.  20:09, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Could you be more specific, please? DieOfGoodLuck (talk) 20:10, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  But of course. Your "anonymous contributor" is a vandal who was blocked 3 minutes before you started defending his additions (see 84.192.127.254). So whoever has "brought it to your attention" is a) VERY fast and b) possibly not the most reliable source of information. There's also a point c) but I need to do some more research before I can be sure about that. Maybe later. Rien.  20:24, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It should be noted that when  was blocked, account creation was also blocked, so new Wikipedia user accounts cannot be registered from this IP until after the block expires.  Also Dead external links may be relevant to this discussion.  --Kralizec! (talk) 20:36, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  As per WP:PROVEIT, I originally was more inclined to follow Rien's reasoning in settling this dispute.  However, the continued reverting of what appeared to be a good faith edit on the baseless grounds of vandalism resulted in a minor sympathy vote for the anonymous on my part.  At any rate, the guidelines in matters such as these are clear.  My proposed solution is that we keep the disputed content in the article until roughly two or three days after the anonymous user his ban has expired.  If the anonymous by that time is not able to replace the defunct link with another/new reliable, published source, I will remove the disputed content from this article in the same way I recently did with a similar (and related) case in the BBC World article. DieOfGoodLuck (talk) 20:57, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Two small remarks and then I'm done with this.To DieOfGoodLuck: Mentioning "baseless grounds of vandalism" is stretching it a bit, in my opinion. Any anonymous user that replaces other users talkpages with shut the fuck up and fucking idiot because they don't agree with him, has, in my book at least, lost all credibility. Further edits by such a user will be seriously scrutinized. And so it was rather striking that this anonymous user first removed stuff from BBC World and then inserted it into EuroNews. Looks like vandalism to me, so I reverted it. To:Kralizec! I know new accounts can't be created from a blocked address. That's not what I said or implied.But anyway, I'm not here to defend EuroNews. I'm sure the article has plenty of contributors that will take good care of it. They'll remove stuff if they believe it shouldn't be here. I only got here because I was tracking a vandal, no more, no less.  Rien.  21:49, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding the recent additions to the article's criticism section 

message: I rarely see anything reported from Greece. --Leladax (talk) 16:24, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  It seems to regard "Europe" to be Central Europe 

message: I would like to see some sources on Euronews's policies regarding the Mideast Conflict, and whether or not people think it is pro-Israel/pro-Palestinian. . ADM (talk) 08:06, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Mideast Conflict

message: Is the programmes section in lowercase for some special reason? 87.219.84.28 (talk) 00:26, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:   Programmes section 

message: I changed the launch date of Euronews because Euronews didn't exist in 1986. It was actually founded in 1992 in Lyon as a European Broadcasting Union initiative by a group of 11 European public broadcasters. -- CTWPerfection (talk) 00:51, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Euronews in 1986? 

message: I am 'Modern Cromwell'. I have remeoved viwer figures from the text. 
References supporting them were Euronews documents - hardly neutral.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Modern Cromwell (talk • contribs) 00:25, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  that sounds like your original research; find a peer-reviewed source stating such critiques. And its charter actually does state "The Contractor shall be independent of any instruction, pressure or request from any EU Institution, any EU Member State or any other State or Institution in all matters concerning the content of its “EU Services” as defined by the Contract. ... Programme content must be produced without any pressure from any EU institution, political party or business entity. ... euronews journalists therefore undertake to “resist every pressure and (…) accept editorial orders only from the responsible persons of the editorial staff”  ... euronews remains impartial while carrying out its European Missions to Inform. Impartiality is defined essentially as the search to reasonably compare points of view within the bounds of fundamental democratic principles. This consequently enables the topic to be given a horizontal (for/against) or vertical (EU/national/regional) dialectic treatment." 93.139.148.156 (talk) 15:20, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Viewer Figures 

message: I've added cable channels but it does not show up in the template. too many maybe?! --Pedro (talk) 14:46, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Cable availability Template issue

message: There's a slow-motion edit war going on between me (sorry) and an unregistered user who keeps hopping IPs, making communication difficult. For that reason, here's a thread for discussing the issue behind the revert cycle.
*In September 2016, Euronews apparently ceased to be listed on the Freesat EPG. Nobody has been able to find a reliable source for this, but there we go.
*The IP user wishes to add the words "after the Brexit vote" (or similar) to the sentence in question. Yeah, it did happen after the Brexit vote, but so did a lot of things.
*I believe that adding the words "after the Brexit vote" implicitly links the two events.
*Nobody, myself included, has been able to find a reliable source that links these two events. Debates on various forums do not count according to Wikipedia rules.
*The IP user asserts that it is the responsibility of the person removing the unreferenced text to find a source that agrees with them. Of course, proving a negative is impossible and that way lies madness.
*The slow motion edit war is staying just under the 3RR for now, but eventually one of us will cross that bright red line; the IP has the advantage as they will just shift IPs if blocked. I can't.
I seek the opinions of the community here, for purposes of my own sanity ◦ Trey Maturin 17:49, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I did some quick googling and you can find a source on the Freesat and it appears as if it was due to a decision by the majority owner. Source found here. I proceeded to insert the source where it should be and modify the sentence, if I have done anything wrong feel free to notify me. Funkyman99 (talk) 04:09, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brexit and Freesat RfC 

message: I think that is a important change than made the article must be uptades. I made some changes already, but I think must be made a all article revision.
I only have two articles reference in spanish, but I think in the next days will be more articles in many languages.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fharlock (talk • contribs) 12:44, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for you changes, Fharlock! I've reverted the for now, as you've stated that the service has closed. It hasn't. There's just been some changes to the distribution system. I'll find a source for those and note them further down in the article. ◦ Trey Maturin 15:21, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Euronews NEXT model finish multilingual multiplex format 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Euronews. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120308144516/http://www.euronews.com/services/euronews-live-app/ to http://www.euronews.com/services/euronews-live-app/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:32, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified