Talk:Austin Nichols

message: Does anyoen know where we can get some good, meaty info on Austin? Dev920 15:14, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good article 

message: The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.
*Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.[?]
*If there is not a free use image in the top right corner of the article, please try to find and include one.[?]
*Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space -   between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 1 Mile, use 1 Mile, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 1 Mile.[?]
*Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.[?]
*Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.[?]
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Davnel03 21:06, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Automated Review

message: According to the Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria, non-free images may only be used in an article when they "significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic" of that article (criterion #8). In the article about Austin Nichols the images :Image:UtopianSociety.jpg and :Image:Glory road.jpg fail this criterion. Both images are only used for decorational purposes and do not increase the readers' understanding of Austin Nichols, therefore they should be deleted from this article. – Ilse@ 11:35, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-free images 

message: In the section 'Acting Career' (sub-section 'Box office and critical success') the movie Thanks to Gravity is described as 'obscure and panned'. On what authority? Rotten Tomatoes? Because the movie doesn't even have a rating there. And the reference to Film Threat? It actually gives the film three and a half stars, saying in the last line of the review that the movie, "...eventually wins you over like one of [the main character's] debate arguments."
Now, I personally thought that the movie was sappy and uneven, but of course, that doesn't give me the right to come on Wikipedia and describe the movie as 'obscure and panned' when, although that might be true in my mind, isn't supported by secondary sources (as far as I can see). 
I'm not a regular editor of Wiki pages, so I'm not too sure what the protocol is, but I think that particular phrase should be deleted, until a proper source is found, especially since the current one supports the contrary.
And yes, this article is really about Austin Nichols and not Thanks to Gravity, but each article should aim for accuracy and balance in all of it's sections.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.45.205.119 (talk) 14:58, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Obscure and Panned' Really? 

message: An image used in this article, File:Austin nichols.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 21:22, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Austin nichols.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: Hello! Another editor has suggested that this article may need to undergo a featured article review. Below is a copy of the editor's concerns. Nikkimaria (talk) 15:28, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: FAR