lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Don Hutson

message: from the main page ,"Hutson is still often considered the greatest wide receiver ever, above even Jerry Rice." is clearly an opinion and not provable as general consensus.  It should be stricken.
Re-wording sounds like a better idea.
Buc 15:56, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Better yet, why not "the greatest rceiver of his era and one of the greatest wide receivers ever?"  --Chancemichaels 20:55, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment 

message: Anybody know why the previous image was deleted?  I believe that a good fair-use argument was made for it, unlike the current one which is by Vernon Biever (although he is not credited on the image page) and still under copyright.  The copyright claim on the new image is suspect, to say the least (sports poster?).   --Chancemichaels 02:54, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: :Some agree that Hutson could have been one of the best wide receivers ever if he had played in the modern era.
Some agree that getting kicked in the balls is pleasurable. I've seen videos of it. That phrase means nothing. But if you're going to us it here, give some citation for it so it means more than "I think". "Although many consider Jerry Rice as the best receiver ever some critics believe Hutson could have been as good as Rice if he'd played in the same era." is nearly as bad, but it belongs in context at least.--Insomniac By Choice 11:13, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explain to me what this even means 

message: Supposedly, Clarke Hinkle kicked the field goals and Hutson kicked the extra points. Cake (talk) 20:12, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Hinkle was 15/31 in extra points in his career. Strange stuff. He'd be more accurate with today's extra point distance. And Hutson led the league with 3 field goals made in 1943. Perhaps the war had taken all the good kickers. Lizard (talk) 20:44, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Hutson and Hinkle
Talk:Axel Rappe

message: How come Axel Rappe was not a member of parliament when he was Minister for War? And where in NF does it say that he wasn't? – Elisson • T • C • 07:59, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: A member of the government was appointed by the prime minister (and the king) whereas members of the parliament are and where elected by the people allowed to vote. Thus - you don't and didn't have to be an MP to be qualified for Ministerial offices. If he had been elected an MP, NF would have mentioned it, but they don't. Still not convinced? //M96hardh (talk) 14:10, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Member of parliament
Talk:Major (United States)

message: It doesn't look like an oak leaf. It looks more like a sycamore leaf. Any explanations on the leaf design?
Compare:
* Oak Leaf
* Sycamore Leaf
205.174.22.26 (talk) 02:54, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Oak Leaf

message: :: I removed the wikproject law enforcement tag because of extremely limited LE content. This article fits  much beter in the military history wikiprojectEMT1871 16:16, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: WP:LE tag removal

message: : During the American Civil War, there were third majors, second majors, and first majors. I can find mention of these but no other information so if anyone has some insight into these sub-rankings please let me know. Otr500 (talk) 17:54, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Union Major
Talk:Bhakti Thapa

message: I added a bunch of twinkle tags, and there were existing unresolved ones dating back to 2012. In particular, the article uses a single source, which is itself an opinion piece. The source is not referenced inline, and much of the material does not come from that source, leaving the bulk of the article unsourced and not in an obvious way. Like its single source, the article uses very anachronistic writing style, and is difficult to read.
I don't know if this article is salvageable. It may be time to turn it into a stub. Dovid (talk) 03:14, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major problems with the article 

message: A.D मा रहेछ , बि .सं. भएको भए । 43.245.93.2 (talk) 17:06, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  अनुरोध ।।।।
Talk:Plain of Bagua

message: I had suggested moving the section "Route to Huallaga Central: The plain of Bagua" to the article, "Plain of Bagua".  It looks the content is an exact repeat, probably somone copying things out of one & into the other (I'm not sure which).  If the main article is too long, it makes sense to create a separate article, but leave a "Main" reference with a summary in the original article.
This note is in response to Evelyn Zuñiga on my talk page & I don't have the direct address, so can't place a talk message there.   Please delete the merge suggestion if it doesn't make sense.  Thanks.Skumarla 23:51, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggested merger
Talk:Billingshurst

message: Guidelines at Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements state that ideally the civil parish should be the catch-all article, avoiding single line articles on every village and landmark within the parish.
Therefore, I suggest that villages within the parish with a one or two sentence article, ie Coneyhurst & Five Oaks to be merged and redirected to this parish article. ++ MortimerCat (talk) 06:20, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: Is there link to Billingsgate, name in London?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.151.113.142 (talk) 20:21, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: No, they are named after different people Periglio (talk) 21:53, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Billings 

message: An IPA transcription for Billingshurst was added in this edit  which was reverted with the explanation of  unsourced WP:OR. It has been replaced with the addition of a 'source' which does not give the IPA transcription. Can anyone find a reliable source for this or another version of IPA transcription? Some discussion has already taken place at  User talk:SovalValtos#Reverted edit - Billingshurst IPA.SovalValtos (talk) 08:59, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source for IPA transcription
Talk:Chilwell School

message: This page initially existed as "Chilwell Comprehensive School", and was then renamed "Chilwell School". It was deleted summarily on Sept 24 2006 (here  for log), and is now being recreated with improved information with permission from the deleting admin. Akradecki 23:53, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

message: For the record, the film Another Day once had its own article, and was up for AfD, the result of which was to merge into the school article. Akradecki 00:01, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: ''Another Day''

message: Reference 1 is broken. Would http://www.standards.dfes.gov.uk/specialistschools/excel/GO.xls?version=1 be a useful replacement? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Victuallers (talk • contribs) 17:50, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've replaced it with this. Tom H 01:20, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Specialist school

message: Rated as Start and low and added these comments to the schools project.Victuallers 15:12, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Added new content and an infobox with logo. More changes/new content to come. Hopefully we can get up to a B soon... Tom H 22:25, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Content changes requested by school have been made. Logo was taken down due to copyright, but with any luck there'll be one back up soon. Tom H 23:57, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Quality Rating
Talk:General Glory

message: His origin sounds similar to Quality's Miss America. 
20:37, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Origin similar to that of Miss America

message: Consistently? Huh? Lobo beat him up in one issue. Lots42 (talk) 06:46, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Lobo

message: Exaggerated patriotic values? I don't get it. The guy loves his country. Lots42 (talk) 09:47, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does this even mean?
Talk:Pennsylvania Route 145

message: The article history looks a bit unstable at the moment, if I or someone else reviews this article, will it not be changing much in the future? Just looking out for the stability criteria in WP:WIAGA is all.Homestarmy 00:55, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've put the article on hold, the stability problem doesn't seem malicious or anything like that, and after this I think it'd count as a stable article. Homestarmy 21:24, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hmmm....

message: It's been 9 days since Homestarmy put the article on hold and it looks like the article's stayed pretty stable since  then as he wanted, with just a couple added references and such. I'm going to go ahead and pass this article. Krimpet (talk/review) 01:28, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA review 

message: Perhaps before nominating this again, we should send this through full Peer review instead of just Highways PR. —Scott5114↗ 14:39, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.  --myselfalso 22:33, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Rt. 145 contraversy - JA10 Talk • Contribs 19:09, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Next step 

message: Missing are:  Braden (spelling?) Field, later known as Max Hess Stadium, was the home of Allentown's Class A minor league baseball teams (Cardinals and Chiefs). The stadium was on the site of the current Lehigh Valley Mall near the intersection of MacArthur and Grape.  "North 7th Street Extension" was the name commonly used in the 1950s, if not earlier, for what is now MacArthur Road.  Two Guys from Harrison was a large men's clothing store on MacArthur Road near Eberhardt Road that caused a major controversy in the 1950s by selling goods on Sundays in violation of Pennsylvania's "Blue Laws."   MacArthur Road was also the site of two radio stations--WKAP was on the west side of MacArthur just north of Rt. 22 across from the mall and WSAN just east of MacArthur on Mickley Rd. Also, on the northwest corner of MacArthur and Grape was the site of Allentown's first television station, a UHF station that was short lived. And today, several successful radio stations are based in the office building near the northwest cloverleaf at Rt. 22Allreet 22:52, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional Historic Topics

message: This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. You have to wonder why there is nothing about the history in the lead though? This means the lead is not entirely a summary of the article. Lampman (talk) 00:02, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Sweeps
Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers/Archive 57

message: Discussion moved to Wikipedia talk:Only make links that are relevant to the context. bobblewik 08:18, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do we need to link really common units in each article? 

message: is there any policy on linking dates?. [or linking stuff, in particular what NOT to link] if so could someone point me in the right direction. its absolutely rediculous that thousands of pages are littered with links to years and dates, when those days have very little to do with the page. so a PS3 is released on november 11th '06.. does that mean anyone viewing the page will find a link to information about all the stuff thats happened on november 11th throughout history? NO!. nor are they likely to be interested in a 2006 page. Its not like there isn't a search feature if you are really interested in it. IMO its link spamming and only serves as self promotion for the date pages and WP. link spamming is so prevelant in WP its just accepted, and it shouldn't be.</rant> ~ Bungalowbill
:That is covered in the Dates section of this guideline. -- Donald Albury 14:43, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately, the techs who programmed the auto-formatting for dates thought it would be a great idea to use the same procedure and visual appearance as the general linking system in WP. That is one reason that the whole project suffers from linking disease, where trivial chronological links are made for no good reason at all, and with considerable disadvantage WRT readability, visual appearance, and the dilution of high-value links. I think that you're confusing the two functions. I'm now inclined not to use the autoformatting function for this reason. Tony 14:44, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Linking full dates to enable preference settings is a courtesy to other readers, and I heartily support it until a better solution is offered. There are been attempts to discourage linking of bare years (which I have also supported), but there are sufficient editors supporting such links to leave the guideline in a neutral position on the subject. You can always try again to change the guidelines, and I would be happy to see bare year links discouraged in the guideline, but I'm not going to take that fight on again so soon. I'm too busy with other things. -- Donald Albury 15:14, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

text: See also: http://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4582 --MattWright (talk) 15:19, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date Links?!
Talk:Millicent Min, Girl Genius

message: Please help edit this stubby thingy. Thanks!
i agreeDrewx1 (talk) 02:08, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Help!
Talk:David A. Granger

message: The article should include a section regarding foreign policy, including the current territorial dispute with Venezuela. --Jamez42 (talk) 21:46, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Foreign policy 

message: Congratulations Guyana, democracy restored https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:EmilePersaud 19:25, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Find the reports and get this guy into the history books 

message: I just noticed that someone (I'm guessing the fella above me EmilePersaud) edited this article a while ago to refer to Mr Granger as a dictator. Now, for all I know, Granger might've been a terrible president (I'm not Guyanese and I don't follow Guyanese politics). Regardless, no one should edit Wikipedia articles to reflect their own political beliefs. In a world where even people who are dictators by all metrics aren't referred to as such on Wikipedia (for good reason, unless it's an official title it's basically an opinion) I find it rather unfair that some random former president gets called a dictator which at best is rather debatable. Keep your beliefs outside Wikipedia, please. (Edit: Oh my God it gets worse, this article has been vandalised to hell) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Civi108 (talk • contribs) 21:16, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: As a matter of fact, user:EmilePersaud has never edited this article. Keep your suppositions to yourself. Meters (talk) 04:40, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Don't change people's wikipedia pages based on your own opinions about them
Talk:Monokote

message: Merge with Ultracote? -Toptomcat 00:06, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Bob Ostertag

message: Did he do some work for The Yes Men? He's thanked in the end credits to the film. Badagnani 01:09, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, he definitely is, but I'm not sure to what extent.  He's in the Yes Men's book, as well. Drewcifer3000 01:20, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  From the bio on his website "He is rumored to have connections to the shadowy media guerrilla group The Yes Men." Haha, my professor is so awesome. 128.120.166.196 20:58, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[The Yes Men]]

message: Bob Ostertag did and still does an important work with Canadian filmmaker and researcher Pierre Hébert. I'm adding some references to the article on that subject.Marinaestelagraca (talk) 20:14, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Living Cinema]]
Talk:Ace (musical)

message: This needs clean-up.  There is a lot of info available on the Web; I am sure there is considerably more information easily available to be added to this article when someone has time.  Best regards, -- Ssilvers 03:19, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Now there is a better synopsis, which seems to follow the 2008 script.  But the musical numbers are from the 2006 production, so that's sort of confusing.  I would delete the names of the cast members who are essentially ensemble, if possible.  -- Ssilvers (talk) 02:28, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Synopsis; other info
Talk:Ducarius

message: I wouldn't ordinarily suggest removing an article merely because of length, or lack of it -- but this is ridiculous. A single sentence? And it's unlikely in the extreme that anything further ever could be learned about this guy. All that could be said about him is already stated in the article on the battle itself. I urge this page be deleted. --Michael K SmithTalk  22:19, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope, this article deserves to stay. First off, he was a noble - which is already far more significant than the thousands (tens of thousands?) of municipal politicians that we have articles on. He is made more famous by his deed of killing a consul, and i did hear of a couple of Renaissance plays that speculate on his later life. So there you have it - quite enough significance, and why go around deleting stuff? We have articles on far more silly things that are voraciously defended because they are modern. HalfdanRagnarsson (talk) 13:55, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:Eduard Dietl

message: Interesting - he seems from the list of ranks to have started as an enlisted man. Unusual in the German Army of that era.
:Not entirely - the British and Russians were much more class-conscious than, say, the German or American armies of the pre-WW1 era. Germany was in fact a rather progressive country in matters of government, education, etc until the 1920s. It was difficult for a German enlisted man to achieve officer status, but not as hard as is commonly (now) believed. Engr105th (talk) 17:43, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The article says that he entered the army as a ""Fahnenjunker"", which is comparable to an ensign in British usage.  It's an entry point for someone who wishes to obtain a commission.  So he didn't start as an enlisted man, he started as what amounts to an officer candidate.  Best regardsTheBaron0530 (talk) 15:42, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Up from the ranks

message: Rewording to avoid repetition. Original:
On 23 June 1944, Dietl, along with generals Thomas-Emil von Wickede, Karl Eglseer and four other passengers, was killed in an air crash in Austria. The Ju 52 aircraft carrying Dietl, General der Infanterie Thomas-Emil von Wickede, General der Gebirgstruppe Karl Eglseer, Generalleutnant der Gebirgstruppe Franz Rossi and three other passengers crashed in the vicinity of the small village of Rettenegg, Styria. There were no survivors.
Proposal:
On 23 June 1944, the Ju 52 aircraft carrying Dietl, General der Infanterie Thomas-Emil von Wickede, General der Gebirgstruppe Karl Eglseer, Generalleutnant der Gebirgstruppe Franz Rossi and three other passengers crashed in the vicinity of the small village of Rettenegg, Styria. There were no survivors.
 Skjoldbro (talk) 20:28, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: The page's protection level has changed since this request was placed. You should now be able to edit the page yourself. If you still seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 14:32, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 15 December 2018
Talk:Model railroad layout

message: OK. i've got this going, lets see what we can do
--Alexander101010 00:12, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: C J Freezer (long time editor of a model railway magazine in UK) refers to 'rabbit warren' layouts as in the text. Murray Langton (talk) 18:20, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Edward Fegen

message: This page says the action with Scheer lasted three hours; the external link page says 22 minutes. Does anyone know which is correct? And shouldn't it be on the Jervis Bay page, and/or the HX 84 page as well? Xyl 54 (talk) 17:23, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Time elapsed 

message: Also, the references all lead to other WP pages; that's a bit naughty. The links should be under "See Also", and the references, if there are any, should be published works. Xyl 54 (talk) 17:26, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: I've started a talk thread on HMS Jervis Bay to try to reconcile the differences between it, this thread, and Convoy HX 84. User Xyl 54's post from 2008 highlights one problem. Narky Blert (talk) 01:23, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistencies 
Talk:Skyworks Solutions

message: I don't understand how this link relates to Skyworks Solutions. Rlneumiller (talk) 10:04, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove ==see also== link to "open source wireless drivers"? 

message: total assert of sky works is amazing 105.245.166.137 (talk) 19:59, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Total assert
Talk:Elfriede Rinkel

message: The writing in this article is unidiomatic in several places. I will attempt to fix it, but can't do so just now. Matuko 06:59, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy Editing 

message: The entry says that she was deported to Germany and that the German authorities were notified. From there it says that she lived on a farm for a while and then went to Switzerland. Was she ever put on trial and convicted of any Nazi-related crimes in connection with her admitted service as a dog-handler? If not, what is her status? Can someone clarify that please? 2605:E000:CA45:AA00:74DC:5F1A:B7A1:AE50 (talk) 11:21, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was she convicted of any Nazi-related crimes?
Talk:Emilio Esteban Infantes

message: I am a user of Wikipedia in Spanish and I note that this comment: "This name uses Spanish naming customs, the first or paternal family name is Infantes and the second or maternal family name is Martín" is incorrect. The first or paternal family name is Esteban-Infantes as it is a compound surname.Ángel Matilla Candás--83.45.102.72 (talk) 07:54, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  An observation
Talk:Loughborough University

message: From the article I don't see what is notable about this particular department, surely it can be covered in the university article Aloneinthewild (talk) 22:29, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Any resolution to this, it seems to be fine by lack of disagreement given how long it's had  Shadowssettle(talk) 19:52, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Loughborough University Department of Politics, History and International Relations]] 

message: The substantive part has no references, and many assertions more like promotional copy.  There are two cited numbers right at the end which could equally well be given for other departments.  I don't see any reason for a separate entry for this department, and certainly not for this text.Chemical Engineer (talk) 21:53, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Department of Politics, History and International Relations 

message: Your article says Lord Pilkington was only chancellor upto 1980, but he presided over my graduation in 1981.
Alun Palmer, student reg. 76,109.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elektros (talk • contribs) 22:31, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chancellor
Talk:Ernest Gordon

message: STUB CLASS....That's a compliment!!
This article needs a total overhaul'''
Bacl-presby 00:10, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 
Talk:F. H. Maynard

message: While http://www.theaerodrome.com/aces/nzealand/maynard.php is centered on World War I, it also contains some info on family background.
Georgejdorner (talk) 22:13, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resource available 
Talk:Ginny Capicchioni

message: In 2007, Ginny became the first American goaltender to start in the Presidents Cup.[2] 
The link is the PGA tour event and the citation is a redirection site.....  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.202.155.2 (talk) 00:42, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Presidents cup?
Talk:Francisco Javier Castaños, 1st Duke of Bailén

message: Chess Club and Chess Club Tournament...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.39.97.250 (talk) 11:30, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Childish vandalism...