lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Salim Mansur

message: Other than the fact that Mr. Mansur is a rather conspicuous professor, a writer, a Director of the Center for Islamic Pluralism, and a consultant, the article does not say a word about the man himself: his bio data are missing, and the reader is left ignoring his ideas and accomplishments, if any, and thus is also left in doubt about whether this person even meets notability criteria.  The article is in bad need of enhancements, and I don't know is there's a tag for that. --AVM (talk) 17:59, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Nothing personal

message: I often see that designation, as here regarding the Robert Fulford reference, and have always wondered what it could be -- after all, who is that prescient? Makes me wonder whether it's like the abuse of "citation needed", meant to declare an agenda. In any case, I input the author and title in my DuckDuckGo and instantly got a very live link to the article at Fulford's website: http://www.robertfulford.com/2009-11-21-mansur.html (retrieved 20181128). I probably should put that in the article, but I want to leave "alive" the question: just what is a "permanent dead link"? alacarte (talk) 18:37, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is a 'permanent dead link' anyway?
Talk:Samuel McIntire

message: Like the situation with the Childe Hassam painting Rainy Day on Columbus Avenue, Boston some of the federal furniture by Samuel McIntire sells for more than the house that might have been involved. The remaining individual brownstones in the Childe Hassam painting have not received as high an appraisal as the painting. Individual pieces of furniture built for houses Samuel McIntire constructed sometimes now exceed them in value.RichardBond (talk) 12:34, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Samuel McIntire furniture vs house values 

message: — Assignment last updated by Olsensamj (talk) 19:39, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Architectural History
Talk:Samuel A. Eliot (minister)

message: From one of our sources, namely: 
"In 1889, after graduation, Eliot married his stepsister, Frances Hopkinson. The couple had seven children." 
Frances Eliot Fremont-Smith is a candidate daughters (here sister).
Ethel Cook Eliot is a candidate daughter and daugher-in-law (sister, sister-in-law). See Talk:Frank Fremont-Smith, and perhaps also Talk:Samuel Atkins Eliot, Jr., where I cross-post. --P64 (talk) 02:44, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Family
Talk:Samuel Kohs

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://www.magnes.org/collections/archives/western-jewish-americana/kohs-samuel-papers-1916-1982. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  VernoWhitney (talk) 03:17, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Samuel Oldknow

message: The reliable sources noticeboard consistently comes out against using Rootsweb/Ancestry etc because of their user-generated content and, believe me, there are a lot of amateur genealogists out there who are quick to publish and slow to check. Should this article be using Showmyroots as a source, as it currently does? I fail to see the difference. - Sitush (talk) 10:04, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citing Showmyroots 

message: It comes from the possible following WP:reliable sources:
* From Here to There: Steering Your VMAP– Mark Oldknow, 33° GC (scottishrite.org);
* the book titled Samuel Oldknow and the Arkwrights which affirms "it is also uncertain how far his initiation as a Freemason at the Lodge of Benevolence in 1787 may be taken as evidence of his persistence in the paths of liberal theology" (p. 232);
* the Doric Lodge which claims he was a "Christian gentleman", as well as the article titled Freemasonry in Murple (oldknows.com website). 
It seems to be the same information could be source directly in the WP article, at least with concerns to his bond with the liberal theology which made his Masonic initiation more than probable.Theologian81sp (talk) 14:02, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category:English Freemasons
Talk:Kotwali Thana (Dhaka)

message: I noticed that the population figure was based on 1991 census. May someone please update the population figure. I read in Banglapeadia that the population is "Population 620,450; male 63.21%, female 36.79%; Muslim 88.96%, Hindu 10.78% and others 0.26%." but there is no reference and there is no year of census when this population figure was taken. This is important in urban studies. As we can see, based on Banglapedia's figure, the population density of this Dhaka Kotwali Thana is 299,734 per sq. km. That's the highest I encountered so far in country division. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yanbugay (talk • contribs) 07:01, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  updated population figures
Talk:Keraniganj Upazila

message: The following coordinate fixes are needed for
—202.134.13.132 (talk) 16:02, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I've tweaked the coordinates a bit to move them nearer the center of the upazila; but since you haven't specified what you think the error is, I've taken no further action. (Note that this article is about the whole upazila, not about the town of Keraniganj.) If you still think the coordinates are incorrect, please repost the  template with an explanation of the error. Deor (talk) 11:37, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error 

message: A population figure from 24 years ago, for an area in a conurbation that is expanding rapidly, is neither use nor ornament.  Has nobody got access to the figure from the 2011 census?  Skinsmoke (talk) 12:03, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population 

message: Hsjsjjsjsjsjsjssjsjjs 95.74.1.160 (talk) 11:21, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population Keraniganj 

message: I would like to request concerned editors to add more notable people from regarding upazila and please add the reference from Keraniganj Upazila's language and cultural page. Besides I have added some names and you are requested to add the reference from upazila's page.  Mohammad Ali Rplsc (talk) 19:55, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable People
Talk:Gulshan Thana

message: Gulshan, Dhaka is on the same topic as Gulhsan and Gulshan. It clearly requires a merge. Besides, "Gulshan, Dhaka" should be renamed as Gulshan (Dhaka). - Aditya Kabir 11:45, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It appears all the information from them is already here. I think Gulhsan is a misspelling, but I'm going to redirect it to Gulshan and make that make a disambiguation page. This page is fine where it is, as per WP:NC:CITY, unless there's a standardisation for Bangladesh that I've managed to miss. Lawful Hippo 17:14, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Shifted from Talk:Gulshan (Dhaka)
Now this page needs to be merged with Gulshan Thana.-Arman Aziz 07:22, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Check out Talk:Gulshan Thana for the discussion. Aditya Kabir 06:18, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

text: And, the amazing statistical description we have on this page seems to be a bit dated (these are 1991 data). So there may be differences between the articles. Aditya Kabir 08:42, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge? 

message: In the map of Gulshan Thana, there has been an error. The node that denotes GULSHAN CIRCLE 1 is actually GULSHAN CIRCLE 2. On the other hand the node that denotes GULSHAN CIRCLE 2 is actually GULSHAN CIRCLE 1. These two numbers (1 & 2) need to be swaped. Therefore, the node with the T&T Office has to be GULSHAN CIRCLE 1. Wish to draw the attention of the concerned people.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Gulshan.png
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulshan%2C_Dhaka —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 202.72.41.15 (talk) 09:04, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been corrected. Cheers. Now the map should be fine. Cheers. Aditya Kabir 18:25, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  MAP ERROR, Gulshan, Dhaka 

message: Do we really need a list of corporate headquarters here? What encyclopedic purpose would it serve? Aditya(talk • contribs) 06:08, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coroprate HQs
Talk:Samuel Renshaw

message: I have added my personal experience to this entry. I actually was able to exceed the 700 WPM limitation of the filmstrip machine at the end of the experiment..with over 80% reading comprehension ( tests were given during the experiment. This spoiled my casual reading though. It was great for college...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aeb1barfo (talk • contribs) 04:48, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Dhanmondi Thana

message: Should this category be set? Sarcelles (talk) 20:36, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No, that would be incorrect. In fact, the area is one of the higher class areas in Dhaka. --Ragib (talk) 21:43, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Category Slums
Talk:Sándor Kőrösi Csoma

message: First, in Zangla he was living in the royal palace (Kharkongma), and not in a monastery (Gonpa). This is a common misconception. Even Ervin Baktay who later found Csoma's room identified it wrongly as a monastery.
Second, it seems to me there is a bit if chaos regarding his name. In Hungarian names, family name is first: "Csoma Sándor". "Kőrösi" is an addition usually used by nobles (the Csoma family was an empowered, poor noble family) that denotes the place of origin, or original family estates, respectively in this case the village of Kőrös. The "-i" suffix means "from", and has the same role as the word "de" in the English writing, which, if we keep the Hungarian name order should be Csoma Sándor de Kőrös, and if we use Western name order, it comes out Sándor Csoma de Kőrös. Thus, I don't think the article's title "Sándor Kőrösi Csoma" is correct, and also through the article the form used is varying. However I am not really experienced in Wikipedia so I would let the correcting to someone more competent. --- Best wishes; Storm, a volunteer from the palace restoration in Zangla 62.201.73.100 (talk) 23:30, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sandra Mackey

message: Highly regarded? Her books are panned by critics... This needs an edit. --Ibn al Hakim (talk) 11:45, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Being named to The New York Times list of Notable Books of 1989 counts as 'highly regarded'. 2603:6011:7812:700:A989:DF92:1F63:164B (talk) 14:46, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Samuel Prout

message: This:  'The collection sold at auction in 2010. Some materials at Plymouth Museum.' is not good English.  Can someone please improve it?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.185.217.10 (talk) 15:02, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I have.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.169.107.99 (talk) 16:52, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quality 
Talk:Scott Sagan

message: Who are Chuck and Michael in the first paragraph? The reviewers cited?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 171.66.56.140 (talk) 20:26, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

message: Hi All,
I was wondering if Scott Sagan is related to Carl Sagan?  Especially b/c they are/were pro-nuclear disarmament.  I suspect a number of folks viewing Scott's page would be curious about that as well.  Perhaps a line or two in the biography section would be in order.  A mention, as in other Biography sections, of Scott's birthplace & the names of his parents.  Then a sentence to the effect of 'Scott is the 3rd Cousin (or whatever) of Dr. Carl Sagan' or, if there is no known relation, 'Scott does not have any known familial connection to Dr. Carl Sagan.'  Thanks.  SaturnCat (talk) 09:27, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is Scott Sagan related to Carl Sagan?
Talk:Boalmari Upazila

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://en.banglapedia.org/index.php?title=Boalmari_Upazila. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Rubbish computer 15:31, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Madhukhali Upazila

message: Prior content in this  duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://en.banglapedia.org/index.php?title=Madhukhali_Upazila. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:04, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Shad Saleem Faruqi

message: Global research is a self-published advocacy site. The source was written by the article's subject and as such this is non-notable self promotion, which is not encyclopedic. It has been discussed on RSN before - see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_1#globalresearch.ca GoGoTob2 (talk) 21:23, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Faruqi's publications should be split from the reference section and put in a separate section called "Publications". I have opened a new RSN thread to discuss globalresearch.ca: WP:RSN#globalresearch.ca. GabrielF (talk) 16:14, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: yes, that sounds right. GoGoTob2 (talk) 17:17, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 
Talk:Michal Neuvirth

message: damngod, his eyes are sooooooooooooo awesome. (L)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.129.137.42 (talk) 20:35, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: is he part Asian? 98.192.200.202 (talk) 02:51, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Schenker AG

message: This is a big company. I don't know much about it but I'm sure I can find something notable! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Moonlight Mile (talk • contribs) 07:00, April 16, 2007
: I removed the speedy deletion tag, since some degree of notability seems to have been asserted (it wasn't when I tagged it).  However, I feel that the article needs independent citations to establish notability.  Just being large is not a criterium, but it suggest that there might be evidence elsewhere.  I'll see if I can find some appropriate tags to attract other editors. --Pekaje 09:24, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  There's a German article but I don't speak German--Moonlight Mile 02:16, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "Schenker is responsible for land, sea, and air transport"
Uhhh, what else is there? Underwater? Is this trying to say that the rail system is operated by one division and everything else by Schenker? Maury Markowitz (talk) 20:39, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ummm
Talk:Samuel Webbe

message: Who is this "Barbaudt" and is that really how you spell his name ? -- Derek Ross | Talk 00:11, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Barbaudt

message: His setting for "Veni Sancte Spiritus" is the one best known to Catholics outside of the plainchant version
This unsourced claim (inserted by an anon) may or may not be true for some English Catholics, but as a non-English Catholic I have never even heard of it. Torzsmokus (talk) 10:29, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Veni Sancte Spiritus
Talk:Samuel Webber

message: Some of this information does not agree with writeups at Harvard and WikiTree. I just became aware of this as I am researching the History of Harvard (see Samuel Webber) with respect to New England's influence. jmswtlk (talk) 19:18, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, there is a mix up. Samuel #1 did not marry his daughter-in-law. It is correct that Samuel #2 was as distinguished as his father. jmswtlk (talk) 19:21, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bio discrepancies
Talk:Samuel Whitbread (1764–1815)

message: The article's claim that "after Fox's death, Whitbread took over the leadership of the Whigs" is at odds with List of United Kingdom Whig and allied party leaders 1801-1859. Opera hat (talk) 22:39, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whig leader 

message: The manner of his death at his own hand is not mentioned. 92.25.154.192 (talk) 16:22, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death
Template talk:Public universities of Bangladesh

message: Numbers are redundant. This is a navigational templates. Please look at other such templates to see that the convention is NOT to have numbers there. --Ragib 19:17, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Numbers

message: Government Saadat College is a university? How, and since when? Aditya Kabir 13:59, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *Saadat College is not a university. It never was, and probably will never be. Please, stop adding it to a list of universities. Aditya Kabir 03:50, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Government Saadat College 

message: I have changed the name Patuakhali Science and Technology University from Patuakhali University of Science and Technology. As this is the name according to UGC. And I've created the article with this name.As PSTU has no website, the name and the article should be checked. So, Help.Thank you. Tanvir che (talk) 16:30, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: PSTU

message: I've changed the name to Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University according to the official website and created the article.Tanvir che (talk) 18:44, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: HMDSTU

message: There are 4 more public universities are left. They need to be created.--NAHID 19:12, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Number of public universities
Talk:Samuel Youngs

message: This appears to duplicate the article Samuel Young (Sleepy Hollow). Which is correct? Boleyn2 (talk) 18:18, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: The reason I PRODded this article is because although his story inspired a film, it doesn't seem to make him notable himself. I saw teachers as coming under the section, and criteria, given below on WP:BIO, which, from the article, he doesn't seem to meet:
Scientists, academics, economists, professors, authors, editors, journalists, filmmakers, photographers, artists, architects, engineers, and other creative professionals:
The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by their peers or successors. 
The person is known for originating a significant new concept, theory or technique. 
The person has created, or played a major role in co-creating, a significant or well-known work, or collective body of work, which has been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film, or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews.''
The person's work either (a) has become a significant monument, (b) has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) has won significant critical attention, or (d) is represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums, or had works in many significant libraries.
He could also, possibly, be considered under:
Any biography
The person has received a notable award or honor, or has been often nominated for them. 
The person has made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in his or her specific field.[7]''
However, although there is the film, he has not made a widely recognized contribution in in his specific field, whih is education. Boleyn (talk) 22:00, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  ProD
Talk:Samuel Zimmerman

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from the corresponding article at the Dictionary of Canadian Biography online, which is not compatibly licensed. See their terms of use. Infringing material has been removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:17, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed