Talk:Group sex

message: "In one notable exception, some regard a case with two men and three women with the three foci of activity being the first man and one of the women, the second man and another woman and the third woman having sex either with one of the man-woman pairs, the other pair, or with both women, or, most commonly, rapidly cycling through all three of them, to be a special case which is not an orgy but rather a 3-on-2, cyclic ménage-à-trois, horseshoe orgy, or other terms which vary widely with locale and group"
Wow, that has to be the worst run-on sentence I've read in all of my years on Wikipedia...
I'd also like to add that the mention of the prevalence of fantasies of bestiality here seems unjustified.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.206.231.119 (talk) 00:23, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Worst sentence I've read in ages 

message: Is there a source for the limitation to "consensual" in the change to the intro "Group sex is consensual sexual behavior involving more than two participants. Forcible group sexual behaviour is termed gang rape"?  Both sentences seem to be wrong to me.  Group sex need not be consensual, and gang rape is usually taken to mean several agents successively having non-consensual sex serially with one victim, which is not the only form of non-consensual sex involving more than two people.  But anyway, citations needed here.  Kenilworth Terrace (talk) 17:02, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consenusality 

message: "Orgy" is an embarrassing Clampettesque term for sex between more than 2 people, the neutral, objective designation of the semantic content. Sex party should just be deleted or worked up in a different sense, currently this is all in conflict with Group Sex to which the other two should have any unique content merged and then become redirects to it. 72.228.177.92 (talk) 04:48, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge ORGY into Group Sex

message: ..and merged "sex parties" into this article. It's okay to boldly revert my actions. --I dream of horses (T) @  20:59, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  I've boldly assumed consensus... 

message: I reverted the 10 September 2013‎ edit which removed the subheading for "Rainbow party", thus restoring the subheading.  Reason:  without the subheading, the "Rainbow party" text appeared to be in the "Key party" section, and the two are unrelated.
Furthermore, I suggest that the "Key party" section be moved from this article ("Group sex") to the "Swinging" article (since, according to this article, key party participants pair up and go elsewhere, so it's not really "group sex" as the article defines it).  Or move it to its own article?  (Rainbow party has it's own article, though nobody even knows if they ever existed!)
Also, I changed the redirect for "Lock and key party" which used to point to this article, because that kind of party is unrelated to group sex or to key parties (despite the similar name).  However, a previous version of that page contains information about key parties that should probably be preserved somewhere (but was deleted when the entry was changed to a redirect).  -- 64.130.10.13 (talk) 20:46, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Key party and Rainbow party 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Group sex. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120220130453/http://www.4healthyliving.org/05aug.htm to http://www.4healthyliving.org/05aug.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:55, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The pictures are in all probality not from Fendi. See Wiki "Fendi" in other languages and "talk" of English "Fendi". Stephanie  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:87:4A08:1325:F5AF:7BD9:8A19:B6B2 (talk) 18:52, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fendi 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Group sex. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090612170120/http://www.psych.ubc.ca/~dellab/RESEARCH/DarkTriad/APA2004Howelletal.pdf to http://www.psych.ubc.ca/~dellab/RESEARCH/DarkTriad/APA2004Howelletal.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120204165221/http://www.theswinginglife.com/vocabulary.htm to http://www.theswinginglife.com/vocabulary.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304115244/http://www.contilaw.com/pleadings/EEOCvMitsubishsi.htm to http://www.contilaw.com/pleadings/EEOCvMitsubishsi.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121103200204/http://mattoonhistory.home.mchsi.com/Timeline/1950s.htm to http://mattoonhistory.home.mchsi.com/Timeline/1950s.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100707061617/http://www.nyclu.org/case/doe-and-roe-v-reid to http://www.nyclu.org/case/doe-and-roe-v-reid
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:37, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Group sex. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091126013815/http://viewer.zmags.com/showmag.php?mid=rqqwpg to http://viewer.zmags.com/showmag.php?mid=rqqwpg
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:47, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Is there a clinical term for someone who has a sexual fetish for orgies or group sex?  For example, sapiosexuals, from the Latin root "sapien" meaning wise, are those sexually attracted to clever people.  There's no shortage in the list of paraphilias, but I haven't found one for this, (see also: https://thoughtcatalog.com/sylvie-quinn/2018/05/sexual-fetishes/) and IMO, it should be included in this article. ~ JasonCarswell (talk) 19:50, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: We would need an academic WP:MEDRS source. Crossroads -talk- 01:11, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is there a clinical term? 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Fuckfest and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 8#Fuckfest until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Hildeoc (talk) 00:46, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Fuckfest" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Isosceles Lock and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 23#Isosceles Lock until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  61.239.39.90 (talk) 03:43, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Isosceles Lock" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]