lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Florida State Road 9B

message: Kind of a funny note, but if you go south of the "stub," there's a message. It says "Go Jags." 
http://maps.google.com/maps?q=30.183008,-81.513975&num=1&t=h&sll=30.183224,-81.512021&sspn=0.005119,0.00795&ie=UTF8&ll=30.183335,-81.513759&spn=0.005119,0.00795&z=17&iwloc=A 98.211.196.23 (talk) 06:24, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That "sign" is no longer present, since the construction began.  Allen 21:06, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Random note 

message: I've removed the "written in the wrong direction, rewrite based on mileposts" tag, as apparently this route is going to be mileposted from north to south, starting at the I-295 junction - so the current writeup is correct. FDOT works in mysterious ways... - The Bushranger One ping only 18:15, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The problem is that USRD articles ares supposed to be written in west–east and south–north orientations. Check with Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U.S. Roads for more information. Allen (Morriswa) (talk) 18:37, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: USRD articles should be south-north or west-east as mileposts are generally done that way. All articles should be that way to keep consistent including exceptions. See Atlantic City Expressway as an exception. Dough4872 18:49, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Except in this case that would be both against the mileposts, and would be confusing on account of the road being built from north to south; you would have to describe part, then "go back" to describe the yet-unbuilt part. - The Bushranger One ping only 20:59, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: USRD articles are not bound by going south-to-north or west-to-east, even if 98% of the articles are written that way.  Following the mileposts, whenever they are assigned, is just fine. –Fredddie™ 22:37, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I did not see any reliable source in this article to confirm the highway is inventoried or posted in any particular direction. How about we wait until the highway actually opens before we pass judgment on its order of operations?  VC  23:10, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I did notice that most articles were written South to North. Being that this road is being built in phases north to south, with no real final southern terminus planned, I couldn't figure out a logical way to start the description from the south.  If someone figures out a clean way to write the description in the opposite direction by all means do it.  Just wanted to be bold and get something moving here. Also, would love to see where you found that they are numbering it north to south.  Makes sense as it would be a pain to renumber the whole thing every time they move the southern terminus. - Aalox (Say Hello • My Work) 15:10, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

text: IIRC, it was a diagonal highway that was signed north-south, but mileposted east-west. –Fredddie™ 23:33, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: M-115 (Michigan highway) is it. Imzadi 1979 →  00:38, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mileposts and route description direction
Talk:Interstate 895 (Rhode Island–Massachusetts)

message: Should Rhode Island Routes 37 and 128 be mentioned in the existing pieces section of this page? Since when you look at corridor on the wikimedia map, you will notice that all of RI-37 and all of RI-128 are part of the planned I-895 corridors. NintendoTTTEfan2005 (talk) 21:15, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rhode Island Routes 37 and 128
Talk:Huangpu River

message: Is there any information available as to the reason for the very brown color of the river？ Considering the fact that it is the major source of tap water in Shanghai， should it be a concern for those of us who are living here and running the water over our bodies in our showers？  There is a tremdous amount of commercial travel on the river (indicating polution from oil and fuel) and it‘s banks are covered with trash。 
Again, my concern here is really just the source of the brown in the river's water.  Is it just rediculously poluted from factories and commercial traffic, or is it simply a muddy river?
Can't directly answer you concerns, but the Chinese government has done some major clean up efforts on the Huangpu. It used to be filled with plastic bags a few months ago, I didn't see them any more when I was last there. That being said, I don't think very many sources of fresh water are just pumped directly into the tap. I'm sure they go through SOME kind of filtration process. It MUST, because the water that came out of the tap in my Pudong apartment was fairly clean, NOTHING like the river itself.211.114.56.153 04:48, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Messier 13

message: I'm no expert, but M13's distance from us suggests it's in the Milky Way's Local Group. If so, this should be mentioned in the article. Perhaps M13 should also be added to the List of Milky Way's satellite galaxies. Cheers 203.1.252.5 (talk) 04:18, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I just added this point with 2 citations, and afterward I noticed your suggestion here. Let me know if all is well! I placed the extra info under "Characteristics".  Culveyhouse (talk) 01:51, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Local Group 

message: The caption in the image gives a radius of 84 light years but the first line of the "Characteristics" section says "About 145 light-years in diameter, M13 is composed of ...". While the profile is not sharp edged, surely the two figures need to be consistent for whatever boundary is being used. George Dishman (talk) 18:59, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arithmetic?
Talk:Interstate 196

message: Since this was a featured article I'm posting this FYI ... I upgraded the data in :commons:Data:Interstate 196.map. The road is much smoother, has the correct post-2020 eastern terminus and dual carriageways.  As a bonus, clicking on a segment gives its N/S/E/W direction. This change is unnoticable without clicking on the infobox map, but better overall for a cost of ~6 KiB KelleyCook (talk) 04:48, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change to infobox map
Talk:Dark Empire

message: This article is over-detailed in it's plot summary and needs clean-up. anyone want to have a go ?  --Allemandtando (talk) 19:24, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with 108.49.193.22. People who are interested in this kind of stuff need the information to be there to read. In fact, some parts of the article need some more info, or are in need of revision. LightandDark2000 (talk) 07:05, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: As it stands, this current version is better off being read in SW Wikis, not here when it needs an out of universe perspective. Unless anyone has violent reactions, I'll start hacking away. Try to stop me, especially that anon. --Eaglestorm (talk) 14:55, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article needs clean-up 

message: A-9_Vigilance redirects to this page, but the page makes no mention of it. It should probably be removed or the article re-written to include information about it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Uncledrax (talk • contribs) 18:30, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  A-9 Vigilance redirection 

message: TIE Fighter Boats redirects to this page, but the page makes no mention of it. It should probably be removed or the article re-written to include information about it.200.142.86.219 (talk) 15:32, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  TIE Fighter Boats redirection 
Talk:Enrique Mosconi

message: More data on YPF and Mosconi here. I haven't finished translating the bio provided in the main source, so anybody, be my guest... --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 16:53, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article needs expansion on other aspects of Mosconi's personal and professional life. Additional sources are needed, any help will be appreciated.  Regards, DPdH (talk) 12:50, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources for expansion 
Talk:Interstate 296

message: I know this is a featured article (I praise whoever wrote it for their hard work), but do we really need an independent article about a route designation with nonexistent shields, and entirely overlaps with another highway? I would think anyone unfamiliar with the topic who wants to read about "that highway just north of the center of Grand Rapids" is going to search on Google for "US 131", since that's what the signs say and presumably what everyone calls it.
Looking at the precedent on other articles about roads in the US, we seem to just combine hidden designations like this one into the articles about the roads on which they overlap with. For example, Interstate 595 (Maryland) redirects to U.S. Route 50 in Maryland, Interstate 587 redirects to New York State Route 28, New Jersey Route 700 redirects to New Jersey Turnpike, just to name a few. 
I want to get some answers before I actually propose a merge (there could be some good reason that this is a stand-alone article that I am not aware of), but I'd like to hear from the "experts" what motivated the creation, let alone FA nomination, of this article. 150.250.5.24 (talk) 02:25, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: @150.250.5.24: part of I-296 is not concurrent with US 131 in Walker, so it doesn't "entirely overlap[] with another highway". There are two separate exits along that non-concurrent segment. Additionally, the detailed history of why the I-296 signage was removed would be either overly detailed in the history of US 131, or it would be so summarized that it would be lost in the shuffle. Imzadi 1979 →  05:03, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why this article?
Talk:Ray Gun (magazine)

message: Is it Ray Gun or Raygun?  Both seem to have currency in various corners of Wikipedia, including this article. Chick Bowen 16:56, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: it's Ray Gun. page moved, links to page updated. (hopefully i did that all correctly. my first move..) --Quiddity 23:11, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Implant (medicine)

message: peri-implantitis would mean inflammation of the implant!! What that does that mean? At the most it could be inflammation of the bone or the soft tissues that cover it, including periosteum. BDB 17:04, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It's inflammation around (peri) the implant. JFW | T@lk 17:08, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I understand what you are trying to convey. But I felt, and still feel the usage of the term is not appropriate. Could you pleasecite a reference? BDB 18:16, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: When searching pubmed, the term per-implantitis seems to be in use but almost exclusively for dental implants. --WS 13:48, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peri-implantitis 

message: I'm removing  - Not all medical implants are prostheses. ~ Booyabazooka 19:32, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with prosthesis 

message: Overall, I believe that the "Implant (medicine)" article has to be updated to incorporate information, such as the FDA classification of medical devices since implants fall under medical devices. The improvements that I would like to make pertain to the section: Complications. I would like to further expand on the human body response to implants as well as considerations that biomedical engineers and manufacturers have to take into consider when choosing the proper materials for implants.
(Jwm22-NJITWILL (talk) 03:46, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible Sections to Improve 
Talk:Polish–Lithuanian union

message: The following items are not acts that directly affected the relationship between Poland and Lithuania, so I'll remove them from the article.
* 1795 - Third Partition of Poland
* February 16, 1918 - Lithuania declares independence
Appleseed 17:11, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Shouldn't this be at lowercase 'Polish-Lithuanian union - since there was never an 'offical' Union until PLC?-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  23:56, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: Is the current name of article shouldn't be List of Lithuanian-Polish agreements or similar? M.K. (talk) 10:14, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Poland–Lithuania which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 18:16, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Interstate 696

message: The end of the first paragraph under "Route description" says, "East of this interchange, cargo restrictions have been enacted for the next 10-mile-long (16 km) segment of I-696; no commercial vehicles may carry flammable or explosive loads."  No explanation is given.  I suggest it be pointed out that the restrictions in this segment are due to the roadway being below surface level, and the expected increase in the amount of time and difficulty in accessing any vehicle involved in a fire or explosion in this segment. --Thomprod (talk) 16:41, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I found an obscure source with the reasoning, including a tidbit about a fire caused by vandalism under one of the park plazas during construction that concerned officials about the potential intensity of a fire under those plazas. (While the retaining walls are a concern, I think it's the plazas moreso that create the situation that leads to the restrictions.) Imzadi 1979 →  16:18, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: While possible, note that the Lodge carries the same restrictions in the section that is below street level, but lacks the plazas that 696 has. Thomprod (talk) 15:59, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Route description addition:  Why the restrictions? Suggestion
Talk:Train of Many Colors

message: "The term "Original When New" only helps if we know when the cars were new.  Any chance the actual years represented could be put in, instead? --Badger151 (talk) 18:44, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original when new? 

message: When does the train of many colors come out? Are there specified times in the year, based on sports events, or is it unpredictable? Shouldn't we have something about this in this article?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.90.78.101 (talk) 19:39, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  When?
Talk:Burgess Park

message: I really cannot believe that the park is "one of the largest public parks in South London" - Greenwich, Brockwell, Battersea, Dulwich, and Clapham Common are all as big, if not bigger! Peter Shearan 17:43, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  I also am unsure how Abercrombie came into it? The London Plan was 1944, and this park didnt arrive until 1973 after the canal closed surely? Also the text of the article was almost entirely lifted from the Southwark sheet, and didn't make entirely clear the connection between the canal and the park. A map would be helpful, I think. Peter Shearan 18:45, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've added a map in to help illustrate, thanks to the data from OpenStreetMap. dankarran (talk) 09:41, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Sonny Emory

message: It appears that most of this article is copied verbatim from  http://cdbaby.com/cd/sonnyemory  Stizz 21:16, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur, and not only that, while meaning absolutely no respect to the subject of the article (and I've heard some of his work and it IS *very* good), there's a lot of marketing-like lingo ... it almost sounds like it was written by his manager or a concert promoter.  Unfortunately, as present I don't know enough about Mr. Emory to feel like I could do the article much justice.  I'll give it a brief go, but no substantial changes... RenaissongsMan 05:09, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Infringement?
Talk:Drewry's Bluff

message: I was the original writer of both article on Drewry's Bluff, the difference being the apostrophe after the "y" in the first word. As suggested, one has ben changed to a redirect of the other. Here is the duplicative text which was deleted to create the redirect. Sorry for the confusion, folks.
:::Mark in Historic Triangle of Virginia Vaoverland 18:37, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Interstate H-2

message: I just removed the following statement:
:A notable fact of the highway is that the speed limit is 60 mph, a speed not commonly seen in the United States for speed limits.
::That is also incorrect, the speed limit on the Interstate H-2 is actually 55 mph in both directions for the entire stretch of the highway. Kerri Ace (talk) 01:13, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Fixed some minor information details regarding exit 7. Kerri Ace (talk) 01:13, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Is that how it's signed? --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 01:34, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Exit 7 on the northbound H-2 is referred to as either "Leilehua Golf Course Road" or "Mililani Tech Park" in different signs. Kerri Ace (talk) 01:37, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Per WP:ELG, only items that are listed on signage should be mentioned in the "destinations" column (hence why I asked). All other destinations have to be moved to the "notes" column. --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 01:40, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, okay. I'll fix that. Kerri Ace (talk) 01:45, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for understanding. I made a few tweaks to the entire exit list (mostly removing an unnecessary rowspan cell and fixing obsolete formatting); feel free to evaluate. --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 02:07, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks good. I'm new to editing, if you couldn't tell. I appreciate the help. Kerri Ace (talk) 02:16, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem; if you have any more questions, feel free to ask me on my talk page or at WT:USRD. I'd welcome you to Wikipedia, but I see one of my fellow USRD "comrades" beat me to it. =) Regards, TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 02:21, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Exit list
Talk:Interstate H-3

message: That is NOT the standard okina. It does not render on common browsers as anything but a blank box, and therefore cannot be accepted at Wikipedia - Marshman 04:58, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:New Spring

message: I would like to read the Wheel of Time series, but I don't know which is the best order to read the books.  Beginning with The Eye of the World or New Spring.  Your help would be great.--Moosh88 18:59, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: My advice would be to start with The Eye of the World. Starting with New Spring is not a good idea and can ruin some things IMO. Eric119 02:14, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your help!  I figured that it would be best to start with the first book. --Moosh88 07:38, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  ? 

message: The Graphic Novel section sugggests that it was published.  To the best of my knowledge it was not, and cannot be purchased anywhere. Chris411 (talk) 12:17, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Spring #6 

message: Removed these from the EL section, should be refs for a reception section:
* booksforabuck review
* bookloons review
* dragonsworn review
* harlows review
* rpg review
* sfsite review
Nikthestunned 13:36, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception section
Talk:List of intrastate Interstate Highways

message: I know it's a 3-digit interstate within California, but since it is the only 3-digit primary intrastate interstate, (let me repeat: primary) could we make a notable exception for Interstate 238? --Geopgeop 07:40, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: But, it's not a primary interstate.   --Holderca1 16:11, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interstate 238 

message: It says in the article "nothing says an Interstate has to truly be inter-state". However, according to my now-gone copy of Webster's New World Dictionary (bought sometime in the 60s IIRC), inter- means both "between different things" and "inside the same thing". Therefore, that statement should be edited.
:The system is the Interstate Highway System. Most people know inter- as between. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs)  22:20, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you sure you don't mean "intra-"? Anyway, I have 2.5 years of Latin, and even back then, inter pretty much meant multiple things. I've never seen "intra" so far in Latin though. Bottom line is that the most well-known meaning of inter contradicts these routes. --Chris 00:22, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition of "inter" 

message: This seems to be a bit of trivia, best mentioned in a few sentences in Interstate Highway System. --NE2 09:52, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Does this need to exist as a separate page?

message: Since this article covers Interstates, I moved the intrastate U.S. route table to Talk:United States Numbered Highways#Intrastate U.S. Highway table transfer. Mapsax (talk) 05:13, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  U.S. route table moved
Category talk:User la-N

message: Consensus was to keep, nominated 5 hours after previous close. See archived discussion for details. ∞Who?¿? 19:14, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Cfd 7 Sep 2005

message: Consensus was no consensus, no change. See archived discussion for details. ∞Who?¿? 19:14, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Cfd 31 Aug 2005

message: There are no native speakers left on the earth. Therefore, this is a waste of disk space, quite simply. --Île_flottant~Floating island (talk) 00:23, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Late to the party but indeed, this category should not be available. -- Alexf(talk) 18:17, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  This should be deleted 

message: Wikipedia:Categories_for_deletion/Log/2005_August_31#Category:User_la-N resolved to merge Native Latin speakers to Professional. 
I have merged the contents, but have redirected rather than deleted the category page, in order to assist in cases where users specify la-N in their babel boxes. In such cases, la-N should be changed to la-5. – Fayenatic London 09:50, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you are referring to  . J3133 (talk) 15:56, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thank you, you are evidently correct! – Fayenatic London 16:19, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Category merged
Wikipedia talk:Using Wikipedia to gain legitimacy

message: I wonder if the "new proposal" part of this should be split off.  I think we could use a  guideline cautioning against using Wikipedia to promote new ideas.  I know this is already covered in great detail in WP:NOR, but something brief and newbie-friendly might be good.  Friday (talk) 19:43, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Philippe Séguin

message: Internationally, he is a renown ally of the Quebec sovereignty movement. Never heard about that. Sources? David.Monniaux 19:47, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Selenium dioxide

message: The Safety section of the article is misleading. Selenium dioxide is classified as toxic and its adverse effects are well documented. The article makes it sound like ingestion of selenium dioxide is harmless.
131.111.185.34 (talk) 09:43, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Safety needs reworking 

message: "It was also used as a toner in photographic developing" It "is" also used as a toner, not "was". 
https://www.ilfordphoto.com/1143207
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9NqWAuwZpss  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.93.146.80 (talk) 12:50, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use as toner