lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ocean Waves (film)

message: I think I've found the plot summary for the sequel in English, but I need someone who has read the book to confirm it.  David Bailey (talk) 15:22, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot summary for sequel 

message: The first release of the film in an English speaking country will be titled Ocean Waves according to the UK BBFC website.  The book still hasn't been released as an English translation yet... does it's title carry precedence in this case, or does the UK film release title take over?  Should this article be renamed as a result?  David Bailey (talk) 21:14, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  UK Release Title 

message: I couple of weeks ago I saw that the BVA stated that it was pulled from schedule, I contacted Optimum Releasing and they stated that it will be released in 2010 to accompany the theatrical release of Ponyo in the UK. Tmvde (talk) 19:45, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  UK Release Date 

message: The links i have given were from a site that was one of the very important site related to the topic. In that case it was about studio ghibli. Now the link i have given was from onlineghibli.com which is no less popular than nausicaa.net if not more. And there is no need to promote the site as it is even more popular than the nausicaa.net and it is the first result in the search engine.And i absolutely know about the no-follow system or rule of wikipedia.And that site actually verifies the character list as it actually gives pictures of the artists and it has many other infos like music pieces etc.And this site also has been there for 10 years so it is one of the most important reference site to the topic. The problem is i do not know how to use the reference template[and also do not have access to] that is why i needed to give the external link. We all need to improve wikipedia so review my suggestion.Nibir2011 (talk) 16:30, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  i think this reference can be added 

message: What we have right now is far beyond what can reasonably be called a summary. The objective is to describe the major plot points, not to provide an abridged screenplay. People should still have a reason to watch the movie after reading.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.168.176.62 (talk) 13:40, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The first version of the plot section was twice that length and was written before the film was made available in the US, so that American Ghibli fans could read about and understand the film. Once the US DVD release came out, we trimmed it down. The being said... it may be due a bit more editing to bring it under the recommended 700 words. David Bailey (talk) 12:30, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  Plot has now been trimmed down to 800 words. Anyone else fancy a go? David Bailey (talk) 12:08, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot SUMMARY
Talk:List of American political memoirs

message: This list is a work in progress.  Please don't delete it.  Matatigre36 21:00, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes

message: Having just discovered the list of works by heads of state or government, I added some links to this article and indicated that memoirs by heads of state could be found there.  It's nice to discover that I am not alone in my interests. Matatigre36 02:16, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a red link, both here and in the article. Can someone fix it?--DThomsen8 (talk) 19:25, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another related list already in existence 

message: Some lists of books have been added to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. You can find the discussions here. RockMagnetist (talk) 22:13, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alert: lists of books in Articles for deletion
Talk:Northborough, Massachusetts

message: Eli Whitney was born in Westborough at a time when Northborough was actually a part of Westborough.  However, the part of Westborough he was born in is still in Westborough, so he was never from Northborough. AmbExThErMaL 21:02, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Editorial Note

message: I edited the history of the town's site.  It was incorporated on January 24, 1766...not June 24, 1766 as previously posted. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tommym27 (talk • contribs) 15:10, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit of History page 

message: "Northborough can sometimes be spelled Northboro, although the version with the "ugh" is more popular."
speaking as a former resident of the town, I strongly disagree with this statement.  It seemed to me that the shorter spelling was more popular, and the longer spelling merely more official.  (Or, arguably, old-fashioned.)  At the least, the article should say there's some disagreement over the name.
:I've edited the sentence to remove the claim about what's "more popular". AJD 15:01, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In an encyclopedic article official is important, and there is no more or less or "old-fashioned" to it. It's my understanding that Northborough is the name of the incorporated town being discussed. "Northboro" is a shortcut spelling or may have originated as a phonetic alternative (the same has occurred in neighboring Marlborough), but in any case, repeated use doesn't make it accurate. declair 16:50, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling 

message: should this be mentioned in the article? 109.150.45.129 (talk) 15:17, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assabetville
Talk:Pennsic War

message: There should be at least a link to the East Kingdom website, http://www.eastkingdom.org/
Casey Rousseau 21:02, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

message: Can I get a reference to Pennsic being its own town? Lelek 15:12, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pennsic being its own town 

message: Well, I was there, and helped build it.  I linked to a set of photos I took of the construction, but apparently this was not considered "reliable."
The fort is visible on google maps:
http://maps.google.com/?ie=UTF8&ll=40.978554,-80.139138&spn=0.001891,0.004495&t=h&z=18
Derianlebreton (talk) 21:01, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source for the fort 

message: Article has been tagged for needing sources long-term. Feel free to reinsert the below material with appropriate references. DonIago (talk) 13:58, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced information 

message: The Pennsic War was originally between the Eastern Kingdom and the Mid-Realm, as stated.  It coincided with an attempt by Pittsburgh to get a waiver from the rule (then) that entire states went into kingdoms: Philadelphia had the first canton in Pennsylvania, and naturally took the state into the Eastern Realm.  Pittsburgh, where the Allegheny and Monongahela Rivers join to form the Ohio, which flows westward to the Mississippi, felt itself more a mid-western city, and wanted to join the Mid-Realm.  Roughly at the time of the First Pennsic War, the rule that entire states go into kingdoms was affirmed, and Pittsburgh was sentenced to remain in the Eastern Kingdom, leading to the tale that the casus belli was possession of Pittsburgh, with the loser getting it—false, but it makes SUCH a good story!  I see that the rule against dividing states has been abandoned, and that western New York, western Pennsylvania, western Maryland, and West Virginia now compose the kingdom of Æthelmearc, the "Noble Borderland" between the Eastern Kingdom and the Mid-Realm.  According to the Pennsic War website, Pennsic 46, a few months ago, was fought between the East/Mid/Ealdormere Alliance and the Æthelmearc/Northshield Alliance; the Eastern website does not mention the Pennsic War for 2018.  How shall we improve the article? J S Ayer (talk) 02:27, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who are the belligerents?
Talk:11th century

message: I would like to thank user:Jagged 85 for contributing new pics and information to the article! Very nice.--PericlesofAthens 04:59, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Additions

message: The entry starts with some stuff that isn't even a sentence. This is the way it looks on my commputer:
[[Image:East-Hem 1100ad.jpg|thumb|300px|Political boundaries in Eastern Hemisphere at this is fake  Kdammers (talk) 16:08, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  The entry needs fixing.
Talk:Moorfields railway station

message: Because of the one-way loop on the Wirral Line in the centre of Liverpool, there are no services direct from Liverpool Central to Liverpool Lime Street (as they've already been there), so the claim that Moorfields is the only Merseyrail station with services to all others is correct.  It's a bit pedantic and a bit of a technicality, I know, but it's still true!  --RFBailey 21:11, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Only station with services to all others 

message: Regarding an edit of 23 July 08..text was added about refurbishment and a new 8 storey Commerce Centre. What was this referring to ? I havnt used Moorfields for a while however i am unaware of any new building or entrance. At the back is the Family Court but that is not connected. And exactly did the editor mean a building to be built called Commerce Centre or was this a slight incorrect ref to Liverpools main business district? If anyone has any ideas it would help as i dont agree with it. Babydoll9799 (talk) 19:10, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: "Refurbishment"
Talk:Peace Breaks Out

message: It would be nice to see this article developed instead of being merged with the article on John Knowles.Manufracture 21:12, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Live from Dakota

message: I've made a few edits.
   · Added the tracklisting
   · Added the UK release dates (Feel free to amend to make more grammatical etc. James Fitzy 21:15, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits 

message: I have added the album cover for the album. Mporcheron 23:07, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Album Cover
Talk:Cove

message: It seems to me that a cove is a type of bay. A cove is always a bay but a bay is not always a cove. Am I right? Or is there something special about a bay that seperates it from a cove in some cases? I'm pretty sure that sometimes a bay is a cove. My main point is: shouldn't this info be on the page about Headlands and bays under "types of bay"?--Matt D 21:22, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Shouldn't what be on the Headlands and bays page?  The information in this page, or an explanation of when a bay is a cove?  If you mean the former, no, if you mean the latter, probably yes.  To geographers and earth scientists a cove has a narrow entrance, often because it forms on a concordant coastline.  A bay is any area of water with land on three sides, and more often than not forms on discordant coastlines.  Colloquial use of cove varies a little though (and I think that fact still needs to be mentioned on this page).  I don't recall hearing a geographer describe a cove as a type of bay, so I can't be sure if it technically is. Joe D (t) 23:16, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  When, if Ever, is a Cove a Bay? 

message: Valleys in the Appalachian Mountains are also called coves.  Appalachian cove is also a specific type of ecosystem.  For a good example, see Cades Cove.
The point where a wall meets the floor is also referred to as a cove.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.201.162.187 (talk) 21:39, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Appalachian cove
Talk:Adversarial process

message: :Placed in a competitive dyad, onen often seeks to apply the role of victor and failure. This is typically an attempt to gain or display leverage in some form, whether commercial, social, or otherwise.
Not quite clear how the above fits in, and the last sentence seems controversial (i.e. needs a source. Removed from the article and remanded to Talk. Christopher Parham (talk) 21:29, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

message: I pulled the following because it relates to Wikipedia, but breaks the fourth wall in terms of referencing Wikipedia. (see CFD for wp:mcg for example why we don't use wikipedia for this purpose.) I came to this page via a Meta-Wiki page and nearly didn't realize I had left Meta-Wiki.
Some view the wikipedia as an adversarial process, since alternating edits to an article are often seeking to balance what is seen (by each author in turn) as an extreme point of view.  The idea of wikipedia:neutral point of view inherently assumes that such adversaries will eventually converge to some kind of agreement, more or less the same assumption as is made in supply-demand curves in economics.  However, like economics, an underlying political economy wherein influence and power is traded, limited access to tools, fears of censorship or the need simply to allocate more of one's time to 'the real world', probably have just as much to do with where a dispute ends, as does any kind of 'balance'.
In this respect, Wikipedia is no different from political, economic, or court competition:  those who have time and skill and friends and resources tend to prevail.  This remains the most fundamental objection to adversarial process, and so most efforts to improve it, e.g. electoral reform, try to balance the resources available to both sides to make their case, and provide maximum opportunity for unpopular but valid views to make their way into the forum to be considered.  In general, economic processes do this better than any other, as new information is incorporated in market prices often within minutes of some important event - due to the adversarial process of buyers and sellers - but also due to the consensus on credit, clearing and pricing systems, without which the entire market would simply dissolve into a puddle.
-- Guroadrunner (talk) 03:15, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Pull 'em U Save 'Em
Talk:Iodine heptafluoride

message: I disagree with the statement that IF7 is chemically inert.
Any other literature I have read on IF7 state that it is a very powerful fluorinating reagent.  It will react with glass and water. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.42.209.81 (talk • contribs) 
:Fixed now. Physchim62 (talk) 00:20, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

message: The data presented is incomplete and inconsistent with the text. If IF7 sublimes at 1 atm, does that happen at 4.8 °C (1 atm)? If so, the text about the narrow liquid range is meaningless, at normal pressure. If the triple tempature is really 4.5 °C, then how high is the corresponding triple pressure? /80.71.135.103 (talk) 12:06, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sublimation at 101 kPa? 
Talk:Harry Gordon (entertainer)

message: This is my first article so I hope I got it right. I don't know how to do the references/citations yet, but I'll find out and come back and do those later. Joeygirl 21:36, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I could help you out with the details. Don't worry too much about formatting! Melchoir 21:40, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Saw this article on the wikify list and did some work. Never heard of Harry Gordon before, but that's part of Wikipedia's appeal: finding out things you never knew. Casey Abell 17:43, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Thanks, Joeygirl. I am so pleased to see an article on the "Laird". I've enjoyed hsi comic songs on 78s for many years without knowing much about him. It's nice to have a bit of background. -- Derek Ross | Talk 06:12, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Company town

message: (pinging top article editors still active) 
It's probably to be expected with an article this old, but over the years, the article has accumulated a variety of citation styles. It's kind of a mess. The article began with a non-templated Harvard style, but it looks like that was the only option at the time. 
I propose to make it consistent using CS2 (and Template:Rp when appropriate, such as the Crawford refs). I wanted to solicit feedback first though, in case any of its top editors object. Schazjmd (talk) 18:02, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't have any strong preferences as long as sources are accessible to the reader. Adding the rp template seems like a really good plan. LoomCreek (talk) 18:23, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  Good idea. Rjensen (talk) 21:07, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

text: I've modified all of the refs to use the same style. I removed items from  Bibliography that were used as citations, and renamed the remaining entries in that list to Further reading. One of the old Harvard refs relied on a bibliography entry that had gotten removed somewhere in the intervening years, so that was fun. Hope this makes the article a bit easier to edit and simpler for readers to find the right sources. Schazjmd (talk) 14:17, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation style
Talk:Hibiscus grandiflorus

message: I believe that most of the original text is a copy violation of the web page elboricua. I have added a taxo table, some links to wikispecies and to elboricua web page. This page should remain but needs editing... --Francisco Valverde 21:44, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *I have rewritten the entire article and eliminated the copyvio tag. Joelito 21:57, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio???
Talk:Emblem of Turkmenistan

message: Ehm, why is this coat different than the one on the Turkmenistan article? -- Obradović Goran  (talk 21:45, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I am removing the cite tag-the round version was the one on the national article prior to 2006, no cite needed as was in Wikipedia itself, both are in use. Chris 05:45, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: From 1991 until 2003, the round arms was used. But I have not seen the round arms used at all, except on us (and maybe a few college websites). User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 06:00, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I also thinking that the round arms have different colors than what we have now, so I am going to remove this again. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 06:04, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Now, I am going to find the Turkmen Law from 1992 and see if that sheds any light on the colors. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 06:47, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Cool! And brother, your diligence on this, your great graphics and your sturdy, polished post-Soviet articles are most appreciated, if I've not said so before. Chris 06:53, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Graphic completed, uploading now. I looked at some of the Turkmen stamps from 2001 and found the correct image. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 07:15, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: arms shapes and cite tag

message: The word "cotton" occurs only once in the article, where it has the pattern of discussing something already introduced elsewhere. But it isn't. So we don't know anything about it, and, especially, we don't know why the number of ?"bolls"? is seven.2600:1700:6759:B000:1C64:8308:33BC:E2D6 (talk) 03:38, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs elaboration on the cotton
Talk:Functional integration (neurobiology)

message: Is there a cite for this? "How Brains Make up Their Minds" by Walter Freeman? Anyone?
I got my conception of Functional Integration from some of Karl Friston's reviews.
Anishpotnis (talk) 23:47, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, hi. I'm working on this page as part of an assignment for an introductory neuroscience class at my college. I'm aware of the existence of a few scholarpedia articles on similar topics, but I thought there existed a niche here for a somewhat less dense discussion on how medical imaging data is collected/analyzed/used.
Anishpotnis (talk) 23:54, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Citation you asked for
* 
You will need to copy  the edit version and delete all of the <>! and -- . Hope this helps dolfrog (talk) 20:32, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Student assignment

message: Hi, a reference to an article just giving the title and "Nature 2008" is not very useful, given the fact that Nature has 52 issues/year. If you use the  and  templates, we have bots that can fill in the rest (and add DOIs and such, so that there's a clickable link leading directly to the article cited). Hope this helps. Thanks. --Randykitty (talk) 11:46, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:Prehistoric civilizations

message: The initial page I put up was brutally deleted and replaced by a redirect to "Prehistory". The notion described is a valid claim worth attention of historians and philosophers. If you have reservations regarding the content, improve the page, but do not just delete someone else's post, please. That does not make a good name for Wikipedia. --Tjfulopp 22:05, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Cardinal spline

message: I added an example perl function. I ported it from a mathlab function. I have tested it. I am going to add a picture I created with this perl function. HighInBC 23:01, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the code display is uneccessary and distracting, I vote for removal or better: maybe you could put it somewhere else, let it be hidden by default or something like that.Berland 07:22, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed it, as the code is already placed in the image description. Berland 21:39, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Code example 

message: I have added a graphical depiction to the page, the perl source code for this image is on the image's wiki. Comments welcome. HighInBC 23:02, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Graphical Depiction
Talk:Pierre Péan

message: :His biography L'Homme de l'Ombre (Man of the Shadows), of Jacques Foccart, de Gaulle's advisor for African matters, owed him a trial for libel, which he won.
*What does it mean who won what (I can not find an English language source over the libel)?
*Does this mean: Jacques Foccart, de Gaulle's advisor for African matters took Pierre Péan to court for libel over his biography on him called L'Homme de l'Ombre (Man of the Shadows). The case revolved around xyz and ** Jacques Foccart won and was awarded costs and substancial financial compensation
** Jacques Foccart won minor damages but his reputation was damaged.
** Jacques Foccart lost
--Philip Baird Shearer 22:08, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Jacques Foccart

message: The part about Lybia seems to be pretty NPOV to me. Especially in that it presents Péan version as the accepted truth (with the use of the word "revealed", for example), when it is actually very controversial. The description of the other books seems to be more balanced, with the use of "alleged", and the precision that Péan views are controversial. I'll try to rephrase the Lybia part along these lines. 130.54.130.67 (talk) 06:55, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV:Lybia

message: I think this article might need some extra protection due to the recent book of Pierre Péan on Bernard Kouchner. I don't know how to ask for it, anyone reading this...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arnaud'Amiral'Montiel (talk • contribs) 17:37, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Not necessary, whilst Péan's biography is properly referenced in relation to the new book.---PJHaseldine (talk) 22:06, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Protection
Talk:Dark adaptor goggles

message: strange article, I am not sure it is correct
Pflatau 22:15, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that it's strange but what do you feel is incorrect about it? Thanks. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 22:29, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This page and Red adaptation goggles seem to be about the same thing, though I'm not sure how to compose the merged article.--MDude (talk) 00:53, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal