lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Muhammad ibn Abi Bakr

message: That San Beck reference is completely unreliable. He is not a respected scholar -- he's just some woo-woo New-Age astrology guy. That sort of reference detracts from your statements rather than supporting them. Zora 05:31, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Post scriptum 

message: Have you noticed how i work to keep all your work, i never revert blind, rather incorporate your work, but you just BLINDY revert anything that you have not writen yourself?--Striver 03:33, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Striver, the stuff you add is usually unreferenced, referenced to websites that don't reference their statements, Shi'a-POV, or completely beside the point. I don't have to leave your writing if it's sub-standard, and all too much of what you contribute IS sub-standard. Zora 03:56, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Zora 

message: Hi, just telling that I am improving the article by adding reliable secondary sources and removing primary sources. If some of my edits are disruptive, can discuss here  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.63.138.237 (talk) 19:32, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improving the article
Talk:Arron Asham

message: Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
- No, nothing is missing however there is only a single sentence on his personal life therefore more can be added on his education, past events etc.
Check a few citations. Do the links work? Is there any close paraphrasing or plagiarism in the article?
- Yes all the links work. No I didn't find any plagiarism as many of the sites are showing stats on his career.
Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
- Yes everything is relevant to article topic as well as all information in each sub-heading.
Ddalanyi (talk) 02:11, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Anzu Mazaki

message: This article as it stands has eight images.  Eight.  While WP:NFCC doesn't state a specific number, since it's supposed to be as baroad as possible, I've asked before on WP:MCQ and the response wsa that a max of 2-3 images, even fewer with a shorter article.  The most obvious fair use one is the one that identifies her.
Now, specifically, we don't need two images of her from the magna.  At least one should be taken out.  Second, there are three images that show her character design.  Again, per 3a, two of the three need to go.  They should also be moved up to the character design section.  Despite there being a couple of paragraphs of commentary, I don't believe that removing the images would be "detrimental to that understanding" (WP:NFCC#8), and thus they should go.  And the two images that simply show her name change from "Anzu" and "Tea" are pure eye candy; all the reader needs to know is that her name (obviously) was changed. hbdragon88 22:12, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overuse of fair use images
Talk:Dirac equation in the algebra of physical space

message: I seriously question the need for writing a whole article on the Dirac equation using a certain formalism - also, this can easily get out of hand: articles on Einstein's equations using various formalisms, Schrodinger equation etc... ? Let's not fall into the trap of writing a textbook here (there are other places where that can be done - Wikibooks). If this topic needs to be discussed, then surely it can be included in the Dirac equation article itself. MP   (talk) 09:02, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this article needed ?
Talk:Craig Baldwin

message: this link-- http://www.disinfo.com/archive/pages/dossier/id303/pg1/ -- has a great deal of information on Baldwin and his significance. 141.155.136.90 03:10, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: anyone doubting his significance is a false flag black ops technician from the hollow earth. just saying.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:08, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Significance

message: Moved this from the article page - as I'm not sure this is appropriate for a biography article. 
* Eco, Umberto. Travels in Hyperreality, trans. William Weaver, New York, 1986, p. 142.
* Debord, Guy. The Society of the Spectacle, (Detroit, 1977).
* Debord, Guy and Gil J. Wolman, 'Methods of Detournement', Situationist International Anthology, ed. and trans. by Ken Knabb (Berkeley, 1981), p. 12.
* Dery, Mark, Culture Jamming: Hacking, Slashing and Sniping in the Empire of Signs. 
Madmedea 23:31, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggested Readings?
Talk:Mike Bales

message: Alright whoever did the most work into this article, great job! But may I ask a question as to why a player of Mike Bales' calibre has a nice long page including results from every single game? Just wondering... Croat Canuck 03:27, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, whoever wrote the article got it right off of the Goaltender's website (I'm not sure of the URL though) --Hasek is the best 00:19, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Thoroughness

message: Can somebody fix up the unorganized stat table and switch the type to the standard one? Thanks. --Hasek is the best 00:19, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stat table?
Talk:Hypotonia

message: is Hypotonia serious enough to affect your health?
:It can be, depending on the seriousness of the case. MamaGeek (talk/contrib) 17:43, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: questions

message: External links on Wikipedia are supposed to be "encyclopedic in nature" and useful to a worldwide audience.  Please read the external links policy (and perhaps the specific rules for medicine-related articles) before adding more external links.  
The following kinds of links are inappropriate:
*  Online discussion groups or chat forums
*  Personal webpages and blogs
*  Multiple links to the same website
*  Fundraising events or groups
*  Websites that are recruiting for clinical trials
*  Websites that are selling things (e.g., books or memberships)
I realize that some links are helpful to certain users, but they still do not comply with Wikipedia policy, and therefore must not be included in the article.  WhatamIdoing (talk) 06:26, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: External links

message: I deleted the passage on MCT8 that was near the top of the article as much of the advice was in bold and non-encyclopedic. This article should comply with Wikipedia policy and not be like a online forum for mothers with babies.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gavin77 (talk • contribs) 06:32, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bold passage offering advice 

message: Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) Disease Vet2be1973 (talk) 03:55, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unlisted cause 

message: "Infants who suffer from hypotonia are often described as feeling and appearing as though they are "rag dolls," a "sack of jello" or a "pillow full of puddin'"
puddin'? Are these rather idiomatic phrases necessary? 3 of them? Seems like some troll added the puddin' bit.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.239.85.50 (talk) 23:06, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slang phrase 

message: Wolf–Hirschhorn syndrome causes Hypotonia, as cited in this Wikipedia article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.125.95.82 (talk) 00:22, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another Genetic Cause
Talk:Alain Boublil

message: It seems to me that a lot of the information on this page should either be deleted or moved to Les Misérables (musical).  Why should Boublil's page have all these statistics about Les Miz?  Admittedly it's his greatest success, but it seems out of proportion here.  The stub at Claude-Michel Schönberg is more balanced. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 03:34, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, Miss Saigon says it opened in London in 1989, which I think is right.  I've changed this page to reflect that info.  By the way, yoh Rowe|Josiah Rowe]] (talk • contribs) 22:56, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Delete or move info?
Talk:One Perfect Day (2004 film)

message: Has this really been released in the US??!! If so, then I won't need to leech it off of ed2k, I can watch it on the big screen!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 
 Family Guy Guy 03:34, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Starman (Ted Knight)

message: The novel King's Ransom by Ed McBain, and thus the film High and Low, parallel the plot of the Starman story in Adventure Comics#81.
23:25, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: High and Low

message: According to Jack Burnley's foreword in The Golden Age Starman Archives vol. 1, Gardner Fox was not involved in creating Starman. Starman was created during an editorial meeting. Burnley created the sketch, the name, and the gravity rod. The editors at the meeting (Whit Ellsworth, Murray Boltinoff, Jack Schiff, Mort Weisinger,  and Bernie Breslauer) each contributed some aspects as well. Fox was not involved and did not write the first story either (which is credited as unknown in the Archives book). I'm changing the article accordingly with citation. --JamesAM (talk) 00:08, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Created By 

message: The article makes it sound as if Ted Knight's home was Opal City when the JSA comics were being published, but the Opal City article says that was a modern invention. Do the old comics ever give him a hometown? This sentence should be rewritten to clarify that Opal City is a retcon. Aristophanes68 (talk) 02:15, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opal City?
Talk:Gotham Central

message: The second paragraph was garbage. Claiming that it was "deliberately crudely drawn" demands a source, and the rest of it was an awkwardly written assertion of two major themes. If thematic or any kind of critical information belongs in the article, it's either with specific stories or with an analysis section that would need sources not to be original research. 66.245.1.87 00:22, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The series appears to have been collected twice, with each collection grouping the issues into different TPBs. For example, the 2004 "In the Line of Duty" is 128 pages long (#1-5), but the 2011 "In the Line of Duty" is 240 pages (#1-10). I'd like to add this, but I can't find a good reliable source for which issues are in what volume. Any help would be appreciated.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.126.2.205 (talk) 13:20, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Collected Editions 
Talk:Brummbaer

message: * This article appears to have been created by the person it describes. However, Bruumbaer does
seem to be a notable person, from an initial internet search. But wikipedia is not a resume database, and this article needs to be rewritten in the style of an encyclopedia, and in a way which gives better context to why we should be interested in Herr Bruumbaer. Bwithh 03:43, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Redshift/Archive 2

message: I wonder if the redshift of light from distance galaxies is also a consequence of the fact that the space between the source and us has expanded as the light travelled through, "stretching" the waves out. Is that effect at work at all, and if so, how big is its effect compared to the Doppler effect? --AxelBoldt
:I think (but don't quote me on this) that they are just two different ways of looking at the same thing. - AdamW
It is the effect. The doppler effect isn't happening in this case. To be more specific, the doppler effect is the result of the movement of the source through space, while expansion of space is separate, and it is so in the article. Hackwrench 17:03, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Stretching

message: I am not sure if an infrared shift was ever observed (wikepedia doesn't seem to have any mention of it), but if retreating objects result in their wavelegnths being stretched depending on their speed, than it seems an object expanding at a rate faster than those we observe red shifts in should be only visable as infrared light.  If someone has any knowledge of this, reply. Raskolnikov The Penguin 23:52, 2005 July 17 (UTC)
:Redshift and infraredshift would be the same thing, if Infrared Shift were actually a term. All electromagnetic  waves are shifted towards expansion. Hackwrench 03:27, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Infrared shift?
Talk:Adept

message: Summary of adept is highly skilled.
Ok, seeing as how no one was doing anything with this page, I have added to it. I'm looking forward to adding more later.
Zos 08:10, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I have rewritten the introduction as well as the tag on the disambiguation page to reflect the more generalized concept of an 'adept' in the Western Mystery Tradition (replacing the former concept specific to Magick [sic] - a term which only applies to a subset of that tradition). Going with the existing sectional flow of the article, I've added a section for Authors. Included so far: Blavatsky, and Bailey. Will add: Leadbeater and Crowley when time allows. Rewrote the HOGD section, complete with references. Will rewrite the AA section soon. I hope someone can drop some more info on the other two sections, as I have no info on them at my disposal. Most of the (neo-)theosophists and neo-rosicrucians adhere to the standard of an Adept being at or above the fifth initiation (having mastered the four elements and either mastered spirit, or about to do so), so I'd like to see some info explaining why Setians and the other group deviate from that tradition. Regards. -- webbj74 19:30, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Generalized/Refocused Adept Article
Talk:Rootless cone

message: So which is misspelled here?  The title or the word in the single sentence?  I presume the title is correct, but I will leave it to someone more knowledgeable to say. Unschool 03:56, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Misspelled?

message: *
*Bruno, B.C., Fagents, S.A., Hamilton, C.W., Burr, D.M. and Baloga, S.M., 2006.  Identification of volcanic rootless cones, ice mounds, and impact craters on Earth and Mars: Using spatial distribution as a remote sensing tool. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 111(E6) 
*Fagents, S.A. and Thordarson, T., 2007. Rootless volcanic cones in Iceland and on Mars. The geology of Mars: Evidence from Earth-based analogs, pp.151-177.|Harvard doi:10.1017/CBO9780511536014.007
*Boreham, F., Cashman, K., Rust, A. and Höskuldsson, Á., 2018. [Linking lava flow morphology, water availability and rootless cone formation on the Younger Laxá Lava, NE Iceland. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377027318302063] Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 364, pp.1-19.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2018.08.019
ChaseKiwi (talk) 13:56, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible references to improve
Talk:General Lamarque

message: This article as it currently stands appears to be a direct quote from Les Miserables by Victor Hugo.  I cannot find any evidence on Google that a General Lamarque ever existed outside of that story, however I am not sufficiently expert to know for sure. --Dglynch 04:03, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fictional character? 

message: Jean Maximilien Lamarque is a real person who now has his own article.  Is it appropriate to redirect General Lamarque there?  --Aophite
:I think it is, and I will do so --Dglynch 20:41, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a fictional character
Talk:Black (people)/Races of Egypt

message: REad the most recent comments from the white people article in reference to Middle Easterners trying to blend in with the White population. NO I did not write it, nor did I conspire to have someone make this up. --208.254.174.148 23:25, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mr. Egyptian  

message: These are comments removed by Esperanza with this explanation: 
"Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Bratschetalk | Esperanza 02:35, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing comments in the Talk Page
Talk:Bengal famine of 1943

message: * Did Churchill Exacerbate the Bengal Famine? (The Churchill Project at Hillsdale.edu)
* I am too exhausted by all this, and by the insular fake that is FAC (yes, it's all an oversized fake, Wikipedians... stop believing in FAC as legitimate.. no Santa Claus, no Easter Bunny, and definitely no legitimate FAC)... too exhausted to ever, ever, ever look at another source again. I decline. I refuse. No sources. Ever.
* I also won't pursue this thread after starting it. I'm done with this.
* But this Hillsdale page is gonna keep popping up. It's a fairly skillfully-woven fig leaf thrown over actual events. So I'll start this thread to let others examine its contents.
**A few errors jump out:
# Check the chronology of the events listed very closely! That page has Churchill requesting wheat for India after the food crisis was abated. 
# The Hillsdale article likes to make the point that India as a whole had a surplus of grain. But there was not a famine across India as a whole. It was just Bengal and Orissa.
# Suggesting that Churchill helped the crisis by appointing Wavell is deeply misleading. Wavell fought Churchill and the Cabinet. Wavell threatened to resign at one point. Wavell also had absolutely zero positive to say about Churchill. I don't recall the quotes... you can look them up.OneOffUserName (talk) 00:55, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Errors etc in the "The Churchill Project"  article
Talk:Stratton Brothers case

message: In case you have a hard time reading the article in The Times in the main article page, here is an enlargement of the image on the page, as well as its continuation:
I'm currently transcribing the whole thing to clear up the more obscure passages. RashBold 04:21, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of rivers of Minnesota

message: *Perhaps the list of Minnesota Rivers page would be easier read if it was divided into a table or columns.  Maybe the state could be broken into regions, and have a seperate table for each region.  It is easy to lose your place when you have to scroll so much.  Unlike others have mentioned below, I think all rivers and steams should be included in the list.  I know this is a tedious tasks, and I don't expect it to be accomplished anytime soon.  Only as more people begin to contribute their personal knowledge about individual streams is this likely happen.  I have only just begun contributing to Wikipedia, but these we a few of my thoughts.  --Andercee 22:17, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There are actually two lists: List of Minnesota rivers and List of Minnesota streams.  CJLippert 02:38, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Readability

message: *I'm not sure these branches need be included on the list, and certainly not in wikilink format.  (Black text would suffice.)  Generally, headwater forks and branches are dealt with in the main article (there are some exceptions that can be found on wikipedia, which I think should generally be merged, but even the fairly major upper branches of the Potomac River are dealt with in the Potomac River article).  Listing these forks as wikilinks that all link to the same article may leave some readers with the expectation of separate articles (and the resulting annoying discovery that they don't), and also makes the list more difficult to read.  If they must be included, I'd propose changing them to black text and using double asterisks for an outline format. Malepheasant 04:24, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: West Branches, South Forks, etc.

message: So far, the List of Minnesota Rivers is growing.  However should the rest of Minnesota streams be added, possibly as a separate page "List of Minnesota Streams" encompassing brooks, creeks and rivulets?  Should all these rivers (and streams) pages also include the USGS HUC (Hydrological Unit Code)?  If HUC were provided, should a list given by HUC be given their own listing pages as well? CJLippert 18:18, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other Streams and HUC 

message: I moved the alphabetical list section after the watershead sections, since that is the way it is done on other states.  I added a note to explain watershed versus drainage area.  I also added asterisks for the rivers and streams that are designated trout streams.  There is a category for these streams but it made sense to add it here too.  I also used the List tree template so that there are lines connecting.  This was done on several other state listings and added to the readability.   I also added an intro that shows the total number of streams in Minnesota and introduces the watersheds.  -- Talk to G Moore 17:53, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Updates
Talk:Sanjawi

message: I edited it, but according to what is written 80,000 people is a small town in Pakistan.  Looks like a misplaced decimal point to me. RJFJR 04:30, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The population of 80,000 must be for the tehsil, an administrative subdivision of the district, not for the town. Pahari Sahib 06:32, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Population
Talk:Scatterbrain (band)

message: * Shows what I know :)  Great job guys!  --Schalicto 04:37, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of albums 

message: According to the Napster biography page on this artist , it's the same band.
However, from what I can gather here the Scatterbrain albums "Infernal Angel" and "Psionic Distortion" are not from the same artists as noted on this page. I am not sure of the best way to update the page to reflect this information.
JaST 11:55, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Scatterbrain" also applies to other bands
Talk:Table tennis grips and playing styles

message: Started the thing. Feel free to add to it, especially pictures for the grips. If you see a player's name in the wrong category, and you're quite sure about it, please move it to the right place. There could potentially be a new "styles no longer used frequently" section for things such as pure defense, the Seemiller grip and Cai Zhenhua's same colour spin/antispin switcheroo. Jimworm 05:05, 4 November 2005 (UTC)

message: Why is the penhold called a "Japanese" position? They did not invent it, consider NPOV? -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs  07:30, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: As far as I can tell, the penhold section mentions both the 'chinese' and 'japanese' variant of the penhold grip. These are just general designations, used by table tennis racquet manufacturers all over the world to indicate the difference between the round blades with a short handle and the square blades with a sculpted handle. If anyone has well-sourced info about who 'invented' a particular grip, then that would be highly appreciated. Wit (talk) 15:47, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Penhold 

message: It's difficult to make sense of the Attacking Chopper section, as the focus soon switches to the "defensive chopper" with no explanation of how they are different. If the attacking chopper is defined by his/her willingness to give up the initiative, it's also difficult to understand in what sense the style is attacking.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ricklaman (talk • contribs) 12:35, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attacking chopper 

message: The placement of the jpen section makes it sound like it's just another  type of playing strategy. I think that within the jpen users, there are many different types of styles that fall under the styles you mentioned right above the jpen section. I think it's inaccurate to sum up all jpen players as one style. I'd rather not edit this and let the author make the call. KTSFanclub (talk) 22:09, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello KTSFanclub and welcome to the WikiProject Table tennis... you are welcome to improve the content and the quality of the table tennis page, in particular if you know details about jpen styles you are invited to include this information in the page. However all inserted information should be referenced. --Cialo (talk) 12:44, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Jpen

message: I know basically nothing about tabletennis, and this didn't help.
Badly needs pictures of all the grips  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.241.79.218 (talk) 05:10, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  means almost nothing without pictures