lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Thomas Stoltz Harvey

message: I recommend Driving Mr. Albert for further reading.
:I don't recommend it and who are you? The book's author trying to help book sales?  Mr. Albert, incidentally, is the nickname Thomas Harvey had for Einstein's brain. Here's an excerpt from Driving Mr. Albert that the New York Times had which describes Thomas Harvey's theft of Einstein's brain during the 1955 autopsy.  Here, the New York Times said, the author "shares a bit of the pathologist's ghoulish greed:"
::He [Thomas Stoltz Harvey] cracked the skull like a coconut, he removed a cap of bone, peeled back the viscous meninges, and snipped the connecting blood vessels and nerve bundles and the spinal cord. And then, at last, there it was. A huge, rough pearl. He reached with his fingers into the chalice of the man's cranium and removed the glistening brain. TL36 (talk) 08:59, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: A Travel Book

message: I personally recommend Carolyn Abraham "Possessing Genius" (ISBN number 1-84046-625-1) as this is a more detailed book.  
I hope there are other people who visit this page?  Claire Lawton
I just read an article in discover magazine that Harvey kept Einstein's brain in a jar labeled Costa Cider. I'm too lazy to cite the magazine, but I think that should be in the article.Celsiana 16:38, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is fascinating 

message: I am amazed and disgusted that no one in authority even considered pressing charges against this man.  Instead, it's like he is celebrated for committing a double felony.  Other than the weight of Einstein's brain, there is little, if any knowledge, to be gained by the dissecting work done by subsequent pathologists.  I can't help but think of some of Josef Mengele's worthless experiments.  How enragingly ironic.TL36 (talk) 08:30, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thomas Stoltz Harvey is guilty of both theft and desecration of a corpse
Talk:Synthespians™

message: Per the fair use criteria for the English Wikipedia, it would be better if this article simply linked to the original cover, which we already do via the citation for that fact. Provided no one objects, I'll delete the image hosted here and remove the link.--Sean Black 23:06, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.--Sean Black 18:19, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original cover. 

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
* Oppose The ™ is part of the title, it's not being used in the same sense as the examples above. -- MisterHand (Talk to the Hand|Contribs) 15:54, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Union Bay Natural Area

message: Summary: +, cit, so cl, rephrased; see Talk. Explication: See Talk:Seattle, Citing sources.
Suggestion: Rename article to "Union Bay Natural Area" or "Union Bay Marsh" since these are the names by which the famous feature of the area is most widely known, redirecting University Slough. (The UW car park and athletic facilities are more dominant : ) Cf. article. The U. Slough, though the largest of three connected with the lake, is not otherwise navigable or otherwise particularly prominent in the Union Bay Natural Area (UBNA). (Ed. --GoDot 18:52, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good idea --Lukobe 20:41, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Would there be any community objections to my doing a simple overhaul of the citations in this article, putting them all into citation templates and fixing the existing templates that are throwing errors?
It seems like the references and bibliography are split between manual APA citation and templates, but the templates aren't compatible with APA because they don't accept "n.d." in the date field. So I think the fastest way to make progress on the cleanup flag is to redo the citation formatting. RiparianCryptid (talk) 07:06, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation format
Talk:Battle of Plum Point Bend

message: I recommend that the name of this article be changed to Battle of Plum Point Bend, which seems to be the consensus among historians writing about it, when they bother to name it at all. 
:Jack D. Coombe, Thunder along the Mississippi. calls it the "Battle of Plum Point." p. 124.
:Gary D. Joiner, Mr. Lincoln's brown water navy, calls it the "Battle of Plum Point." p. 67.
:Spencer C. Tucker, Blue and Gray navies, calls it the "Battle of Plum Point Bend."
:John D. Milligan, Gunboats down the Mississippi, calls it the Battle of Plum Point Bend." pp.64ff.
:Civil War naval chronology does not name the battle, but says only that it took place at Plum Point Bend. p. II-62.
:Raimondo Luraghi, A history of the Confederate Navy, likewise writes only that it took place at Plum Point Bend. p. 169.
To defend the present name, I can find no sources other than Captain Walke's drawing that accompanies the article referring to it as the "Battle of Fort Pillow."
PKKloeppel (talk) 13:43, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 
Talk:Blood Order

message: The inscription is UND JHR HABT DOCH GESIEGT, please see  and . Thanks. —SHININGEYES 01:17, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: the phrase "...und ihr habt doch gesiegt" is translated wrong. a proper translation would not be "...and yet you have conquered" but "...and you were victorious after all". M. Krohn 17:22, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Translation

message: "Unlike other medals, the ribbon was worn on the right breast of the uniform tunic in the form of a rosette."
The Blood Order medal is obvious in Maurice picture but I don't see this medal in the Dietrich picture even when it is enlarged.  Where is it in the picture?
69.228.15.120 (talk) 06:56, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Medal in Dietrich picture?
Talk:TIMED

message: Propose move/rename of this page to the full name before there is another TIMED to confuse it with. - Rod57 (talk) 01:19, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Propose move/rename of this page to the full name 

message: There seem to be conspiracy theories about this satellites results - so could we have more detail on "SABER had a flaw in its optical filter that caused it to overestimate water vapor levels; this error was discovered and the data were corrected" - eg. When and how was the error discovered? How was the correction or recalibration done ?  - Rod57 (talk) 01:24, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  More detail on the optical filter error and correction please
Talk:Maarten Stekelenburg

message: Wouldn't it be Van der Sar?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.241.230.232 (talk) 10:05, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 1st Choice keeper for holland?

message: ...according to the article, but it says Stekelenburg made his debut in 2002, and van der Sar left Ajax in 1999... I'm assuming Ajax didn't play without a keeper for a couple of seasons, so I'm going to try to edit that out without butchering the intro too much. BulbaThor (talk) 14:11, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  He replaced Van der Sar in Ajax team... 

message: He now plays for A.S. Roma  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.17.224.197 (talk) 21:41, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transfer to A.S. Roma 
Talk:Joris Mathijsen

message: Adding up the appearances for Willem II from the various seasons, I arrive at a total of 127 appearances. In the infobox, the total is stated as 128. There must be an error here somewhere. --Coyets 12:31, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in the statistics for Willem II 
Talk:André Ooijer

message: i noticed his international career according to the infobox began in 1999. however, he was also featured in the 98 WC team. i presume it is because he did not play then... Chensiyuan 11:16, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: when he got his first cap

message: I'm not much inside the soccer scene, but is oranje spelled correctly here? I use the American spelling of orange to describe the color and fruit, but it provides no citation or link to another article at that specific point. CosmoBurst (talk) 04:41, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is "oranje" spelled correctly?
Talk:Louis William, Margrave of Baden-Baden

message: ==Untitled==
The title is wrong. He was Margrave of Baden (a state), not of Baden-Baden (a town). I have altered the references in the text.
:Someone seems to have done a revert. It's all over the place now. It's a soup sandwich now. I just started to fix it, but links, etc. need to be changed -- huge problem. This is completely screwed up at this point. 155.213.224.59 (talk) 19:37, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: The title is wrong. He was Margrave of Baden (a state), not of Baden-Baden (a town). I have altered the references in the text.
:Someone seems to have done a revert. It's all over the place now. It's a soup sandwich now. I just started to fix it, but links, etc. need to be changed -- huge problem. This is completely screwed up at this point. 155.213.224.59 (talk) 19:37, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Indestructible Man (novel)

message: The Plot summary voailted copywrite laws.(Black Dalek 19:58, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

message: Is the "Grant" bit a reference to Cy Grant, or to the fact that Francis Matthews based Captain Scarlet's voice on Cary Grant? Daibhid C (talk) 21:28, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Grant Matthews
Talk:Biomega (manga)

message: Dropping here:
*ANN: vol. 2 Right Turn Only Right turn only vol. 3 vol. 4 Right Turn only vol. 5
*Mania.com: vol. 2 vol. 3  vol. 4 
*CBS4: vol. 3-4
*CBB: vol. 4
*AA: vol. 2
*Manga Life:  vol. 4
*AICN:vol 3-5
--KrebMarkt (talk) 18:54, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review(s) 

message: I'm not sure about names. In the french edition by Glénat Niarudi is Nyaldee which is (I believe) a more correct name interpretation.
Anyone with more knowledge on this?
--82.224.89.45 (talk) 10:32, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name spellings
Talk:Lucas Prata

message: This page was previously deleted.  See this link: --Alan 01:30, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion log 

message: By the information in the article, the artist seems to meet the criteria in WP:MUSIC, having released two albums for example. I am removing the notability tag.
But the article definitely needs sources in order to be verifiable. Also, it is hard to extract the relevant information, since e.g. a list of albums. including label, is not clearly given, and many claims are vague and/or unsourced. 
Sorted as part of the Notability wikiproject. --B. Wolterding 17:28, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  notability, references
Talk:Cookie grabber

message: That's all fine and all, but ... how does it work? How can I prevent it? Does it only work in IE? Quite short stub. Even for a stub.
Where can I download this?
I added a fact tag because I felt a 1 sentence declaration of creatorship seemed a bit dubious. If it is a generally accepted fact, please revert my tagging. 24.205.34.217 16:24, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Electrical treeing

message: We could do with some pictures of treeing. In the mean time how about including the Lichtenberg figure photo?--Light current 01:34, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I do have a picture of a polycarbonate insulating plate from a trigatron that has extensive tracking (2D treeing) that I can make available. I also have a particularly good 3D Tree-shaped Lichtenberg figure within a cube that I could also make availablefor this page. Will try to add over the next few days...  Bert 03:57, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

message: Some nice treeing ther Bert!--Light current 17:47, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nice trees! 

message: Water tree is a description of the same phenomenon under a different title, and could usefully be merged here. --Wtshymanski (talk) 21:09, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Well...yes. Like, every textbook on the subject, ever?  How about page 260 of Hugh M. Ryan (ed.), High Voltage Engineering and Testing Second Edition, The Institution of Electrical Engineers, 2001 ISBN 0 85296 775 6 ? This talks about trees in insulation as a result of water and electric fields. --Wtshymanski (talk) 15:00, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Try not to be so condescending when responding to other editors (WP:CIVILITY).  That you might have an entire bookshelf devoted to the subject does not mean that the rest of us do.  I looked it up in an online encyclopedia which told me they were not the same thing, hence the request for a supporting reference.  If you have such evidence, then there is no problem, is there?  I B Wright (talk) 16:11, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia is not a reference for Wikipedia. Every time I express an opinion on something I know nothing about, I get called on it and usually feel foolish. --Wtshymanski (talk) 16:31, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I did not claim that it was.  However, it is you that is claiming that they are the same thing.  If that is the case, it requires a reference (which you seem to have). I B Wright (talk) 17:15, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

text: Incivility is something at which Wtshymanski is the master.  You may care to read this and this for a rivetting accout of all his editing faults. 86.159.159.194 (talk) 17:07, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Strewth!  I had no idea, possibly because I have had minimal interaction.  How come the admins have taken no action following all of that? I B Wright (talk) 17:15, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Bill Sikes

message: This is simply a question, for no reason in particular. I'd like another person who read the exceptional book Oliver Twist to tell me their opinion. I was under the impression that Sikes did love Nancy, but subconsciously- he didn't know it until he was haunted with guilt of his murdering her. Even then, he still didn't know it too very well. Can someone tell me if I'm right or wrong? 2603:7081:6901:9C3A:2C42:95E6:121E:95B6 (talk) 15:49, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I would say that Bill did possess romantic feelings for Nancy but was incapable of portraying them in a 'normal' way. He was clouded by his delusional entitlement fuelled by his toxic masculinity and capabilities of killing anyone in his way. Bill like many own didn't know what he had until he lost it. 84.67.67.244 (talk) 17:48, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does Sikes l0ve Nancy?
Talk:List of The West Wing broadcasters and home video releases

message: Does anyone know where more up to date dvd release scheduals can be found? For example region 4 season 6 & 7?
Tmothyh 01:42, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is now a complete series (seasons 1-7) R2 set, apparently available since 6-Nov-2006 according to http://www.amazon.co.uk/Complete-West-Wing-Seasons-1-7/dp/B000I8OC08
As for the R4 query, EzyDVD indicate a release date of 2-May-2007 for Season 6 (http://www.ezydvd.com.au/item.zml/792078), but there is still no release date for Season 7.
--J-- 01:01, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  DVD releases
Talk:Zandalee

message: Previously this article claimed that Zandalee was the only "double x rated" movie Nicolas Cage ever was in. The idea of a "double x rating" is just hype used in the adult movie industry and would not have been used in relation to a mainstream film such as this, particularly given that Zandalee came out after the X rating had officially been replaced by NC-17. --Metropolitan90 01:45, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:David Laliberté

message: This page is meant to cover the subject David Laliberte as a professional athelete, including his transaction and movement throughout the league.
How is my sourced and accurate editing referring to his trade to Anaheim considered vandalism?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.39.32.81 (talk) 18:59, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It was a mistake on my part. I overlooked the accurate information in the article that was referenced. Sorry! Logan (talk) 19:01, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  David Laliberte trade to Anaheim
Talk:Thomas B. Fargo

message: The scope of this page is to pay homage to Admiral Thomas B. Fargo for those that have served with him during his career. Personally, I served with for Admiral Fargo in the 90’s at COMUSNAVCENT/COMFITHFLEET on his staff and bear witness to his success as an intelligent, wise and committed leader to his command and the personnel that served under him. Admiral Fargo is a one-of-a-kind individual that inspired others to be the best that they could be. He provided everyone with the hope of success and the chance to prove themselves to the best of their ability. Simply writing this letter should give testament to any reader that Admiral Fargo was inspirational. Should anyone have the opportunity to meet and talk with Admiral Fargo, his personality will prove to be infectious and motivational. I was honored to serve for Admiral Fargo and would recommend anyone else to post their comments.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mati71 (talk • contribs) 18:04, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Testimonial 

message: The second link is broken.
Basesurge (talk) 08:08, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  In Re: "References"
Talk:152 mm SpGH DANA

message: There are some POV problems with the first paragraph, and it's nowhere noted what country originally designed it - necessary for statements like the first sentence of the development history. Also, in regards to the first sentence, certainly the Soviet [I]SU-152 was earlier - is the development wheels instead of treads? This should be emphasized. I wouldn't know enough, however, to go about researching this.
TitoLeibowitz 02:01, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It was designed in Slovakia, as far as I know. --Ondrejsv (talk) 19:32, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Czechoslovakia's defense industry structure was anything but atomic. While it may have been assembled in Slovakia, parts of any sophisticated equipment were produced and designed all over the country. Ihosama (talk) 11:09, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: FYI, these are now in operation in Ukraine, if someone can update the map Yellowmellow45 (talk) 18:26, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map and figures update 

message: Here, and most outside sources agree that DANA is based on the T815 chassis, first produced 1983; the T815 page also mentions this fact. However, DANA was designed 1976, and produced 1980, so this does not add up. Additionally, the T813 (predecessor to the T815) page states that DANA is based on it aswell, so what is it? It is clearly based on the Tatra heavy vehicles, that much is clear, but the "how so" of it is not. Nickolas Ryan (talk) 04:30, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timeline inconsistency between pages
Talk:List of frigate classes of the Royal Navy

message: As this is a page concerned with frigate classes, rather than individual ships, would it perhaps make more sense to separate the List of sail frigates of the Royal Navy section of the article into its own page, as it has the potential to become very long. Martocticvs 17:16, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of sail frigates 

message: Is the Surprise that has just been added to the list of sail frigates a genuine vessel or the fictional one?  There are no references at all in the article, so this and the other statements can't be checked Viv Hamilton 21:57, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you.  I have taken the unreferenced template off the page.  Viv Hamilton 08:08, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

text: I've corrected the link - the article is named HMS Surprise (1794) in accordance of naming ship articles with when the ship was built Viv Hamilton 12:33, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

text: Now that the article name has been changed, I've changed the link to 1796, from 1794 so that it links direct to the article rather than via a redirect.  The point before, was that the link was wrong so showed as red, as though an article didn't exist and it didn't direct the reader to the article Viv Hamilton 14:00, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  unreferenced template 

message: I reverted the assessments under MILHIST and SHIP.  The assessment pages of both projects state that lists are assessed as for other articles (other than progressing to featured list).  The assessment should not be NA, which should be used for templates and disambiguation pages that do not need assessing.  Viv Hamilton 08:29, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Project assessment 

message: Should it be 1799 or 1800 instead?--Filll 12:58, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leda class date 

message: She is missing from the list of frigates.  Her is her individual information:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Naiad_(1797)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.201.133.223 (talk) 16:24, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  HMS Naiad 

message: 1794 Artois Class. Is there any information on the fate of this ship?Geoffreybrooks (talk) 17:30, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  HMS Diana 

message: Does this section of the article really add anything? It is incomplete and seems to only repeat information given earlier in a more useful manner. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 16:04, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sail frigates – alphabetically
Talk:Henderson State University

message: This is a pretty pathetic article for my old Alma Mater. 1 paragraph on the history, then a page full of the embarassment of the Jones years prior to acquisition by ASU and the meth scandal?  Then nothing but sports and alumni? I don't mean to criticize someone for their efforts, but are you proud of this final product?  No desire to flesh it out any further? If there's any other contributors that can dedicate time to this, it would be most appreciated. Greyspeir (talk) 22:38, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your suggestion. When you believe an article needs improvement, please feel free to change it.  We encourage you to be bold in updating pages, because wikis like ours develop faster when everybody edits. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. You can always preview your edits before you publish them or test them out in the sandbox. If you need additional help, check out our getting started page or ask the friendly folks at the Teahouse.   ElKevbo (talk) 23:14, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wow
Talk:Believe... There's Magic in the Stars

message: --Linklewtt 02:19, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

message: 24.227.251.148 (talk) 17:57, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. NiciVampireHeart 18:03, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 16 March 2015 

message: [Entire article text removed]
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.227.251.148 (talk) 20:46, 17 March 2015‎ (UTC)
: Not done: You have not provided any reliable sources that Believe is coming back for the 60th anniversary (hint: it isn't), and you appear to be evading the block of User:Phillip Pham. --Ahecht (TALKPAGE) 21:25, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 17 March 2015