Talk:Caoimhe Butterly

message: I read today an article about Caoimhe Butterly and was surprised that so much information are scattered online and no entry for her on wikipedia. I started this article, but do need help to clean up and get the rest of the info into the article. The critics part is next, feel free to help. Abountu 23:29, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The entry is a pathetic puff piece, glorifying a sleazy ideologue with no conscience whatsoever.
I thought Wikipedia was supposed to be an encyclopedia, not a lefty glorification poster.
The line "Butterly is a pacifist who is a member of the International Solidarity Movement (ISM), an organisation that seeks non-violent alternatives to armed intifada by mobilising international civil society” comes from artilce "Front line life of an Irish peace crusader" by Michael McCaughan, published in The Observer on Sunday 7 April 2002 and reprinted by the Guardian. It is referenced and all, but it is blatantly false.
ISM is anythng but what is described here. Its support of arch-murderer Arafat destroys all its credibility as a pacifist organization. ISM is led by Palestinian "handlers," or undercover supervisors. 
In 2003 press conference its leaders said peace will come when Zionism and Israel are destroyed (by that standard, Hitler was a pacifist.)
ISM tried to hide Islamic Jihad terrorist Shadi Sukiya, who was arrested in their  office in the West Bank in March 2003. An arms cache was also found in an ISM office. Two suicide bombers who bombed Mike’s Place, killing three people, gained entry into Israel under the auspices of the ISM. At the second annual conference in 2005 in Michigan, Sami Al-Arian, was guest of honor, chants included "Itbakh Al-Yahood!" (Kill the Jews!)
What does one do when a properly referenced entry is, together with all the references, blatantly false? 75.82.32.165 (talk) 00:04, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Ninety-nine percent of this article is propaganda for a bloodthirsty, anti-Semitic terrorist. 70.23.177.216 16:23, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is this? 

message: "reverting version with misspelling of the name of the subject of the article, deleted sources, and POV-pushing. Conservativevoice.com publishes EDITORIALS, not neutral articles; that fails WP:RS"
User:John Broughton
:If you go through the article's history, you will see that, contrary to your claim on my talk page, I did not <I>insert</I> any misspellings. Unbeknownst to me, the misspellings had been in the article since its first version. Rather, I undid Wnjr's c------d, POV version, which brought the misspellings back in (along with my otherwise improved version), whose correction had been the only constructive edits he had made. So much for the insinuation that I had vandalized the article. The claim that I made the article POV is ludicrous. I had inserted a tiny bit of balance into what had been an exercise in pure propaganda; now it is back to pure propaganda. As for <I>The Conservative Voice</I>,[http:theconservativevoice.com] it publishes both neutral news articles and commentary.
:70.23.199.239 06:32, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A source called "The Conservative Voice" is not conservative, but neutral?  Forgive me if I don't find that assertion credible! Pustelnik (talk) 03:32, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Response to User:John Broughton

message: It's not that the article has a POV problem (although it has), it's the bulk of its content being a unencyclopedic narrative that is strictly speaking off-topic in a biographical article - while, perhaps, being on-topic in the Battle of Jenin article, for instance (but again not in the narrative form). GregorB 13:27, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV and off-topic 

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 23:41, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]] 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Caoimhe Butterly. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://solasbhride.ie/feile-bhride/2004/afri-conference.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130618043555/http://www.commondreams.org/headlines02/0407-02.htm to http://www.commondreams.org/headlines02/0407-02.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090402054109/http://www.commondreams.org:80/views02/1127-04.htm to http://www.commondreams.org/views02/1127-04.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060821214838/http://www.counterpunch.org:80/butterfly1123.html to http://www.counterpunch.org/butterfly1123.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:27, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This isn't an encyclopedia article, it's an advertisement. 2604:2000:9046:800:7990:524A:3448:3897 (talk) 09:05, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Caoimhe Butterly. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140314165158/http://www.catholicworker.org/historytext.cfm?Number=4 to http://www.catholicworker.org/historytext.cfm?Number=4
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.commondreams.org/views02/1127-04.htm
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.counterpunch.org/butterfly1123.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:49, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified