Talk:State Duma

message: Numbers don't sum up. I guess 450 is max by constitution. In reality someone may, e.g,. die. So, what's  up with the tally? mikka (t) 21:18, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Math problem

message: Oppose merge with Duma. -- Petri Krohn 06:47, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: This article is not up to date. Russia just had a Parliamental Election. What are the CURRENT (2007) composition?--24.87.7.43 (talk) 03:18, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2003 numbers, not up to date. 

message: what about a cake diagramm?-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 14:37, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  cake diagramm 

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests December 2011 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 12:59, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I added a panoramic view where the building in not the prime subject of the photo and should pass the copyright restriction.  It is a Wikimedia photo of Menage Square.  24.241.69.99 (talk) 14:09, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Langman sto.jpg Nominated for Deletion

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Mkativerata (talk) 05:16, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on State Duma. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140227093258/http://pravo.gov.ru:8080/page.aspx?88303 to http://pravo.gov.ru:8080/page.aspx?88303
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161230022705/http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/cover_story/2016/05/the_thriving_russian_black_market_in_dissertations_and_the_crusaders_fighting.html to http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/cover_story/2016/05/the_thriving_russian_black_market_in_dissertations_and_the_crusaders_fighting.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120419092844/http://www.neva24.ru/a/2012/02/11/Partija_Zelenie_vnov_po/ to http://www.neva24.ru/a/2012/02/11/Partija_Zelenie_vnov_po/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:35, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Do we have a source for saying LDPR and Rodina have a formal confidence and supply arrangement with United Russia? The way the article is written implies a formal arrangement, and not just informal "systemic opposition" status often discussed with these parties, but I've found nothing in my searches that supports the existance of such an agreement. Please advise. --HighFlyingFish (talk) 01:54, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Seeing no sources, I'm going to remove the "confidence and supply" claim and list them as opposition. If this is going to be in the article it needs to be cited. --HighFlyingFish (talk) 02:43, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Confidence and Supply" 

message: Today, the EU announced that it will "extend restrictive measures to cover all the 351 members of the Russian State Duma..." who voted to "recognise the independence of the self-proclaimed Donetsk and Luhansk 'republics.'" They list the measures taken, although they did not mention names. You can find it here MagnoliaSouth (talk) 20:01, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: An entire section? No, I think absolutely not. And these sanctions only apply to those current deputies who voted in favour of recognition, this body in its current form exists since 1993. Mellk (talk) 20:11, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aren't the sanctions imposed by the EU worthy of a section in this article? 

message: There appears to be overwhelming evidence within this article to justify using the phrase "Rubber Stamp" to describe the Duma, presently. Do any other editors object to including this phrase in the article?
2600:387:F:4312:0:0:0:8 (talk) 00:42, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it can be mentioned in history section about its gradual transformation to a rubber stamp, since it was competitive in its earlier days. The slide to authoritarianism was gradual and I would say after 2011-2012 (when there was a surge of opposition and this was clamped down). Depending on what RS state. Mellk (talk) 18:24, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rubber stamp? 

message: Ejke 151.177.62.75 (talk) 21:22, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  eiie 

message: What the parties in Russia 2603:6080:5B09:A1DB:EFA1:707F:3991:2FF6 (talk) 15:47, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Russia