Talk:Origins of the Sino-Indian War

message: wats with these indian in wiki being all so bias here. this article is such a bs  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.70.11.142 (talk) 18:56, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I commented out a very large number of broken references for "Garver", "Calvin" as well as ones for "Guruswamy" and "VKSingh".  Seems that the first two would be of great value if they could be found again.  Ogre lawless (talk) 22:23, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Provided a direct link to U of Harvard plus book citation for Garver - now we need page numbers for commented-out citations, which I assume were not present in the first place. Cheers, Rayshade (talk) 22:56, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Large number of broken references 

message: Substituted at 14:48, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Events leading to the Sino-Indian War. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090326032121/http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~johnston/garver.pdf to http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~johnston/garver.pdf
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.epw.org.in/articles/2006/09/10532.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:59, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Events leading to the Sino-Indian War. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071013172913/http://hinduonnet.com/fline/fl2018/stories/20030912002104800.htm to http://www.hinduonnet.com/fline/fl2018/stories/20030912002104800.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050326174852/http://www.hinduonnet.com/fline/fl2017/stories/20030829001604900.htm to http://www.hinduonnet.com/fline/fl2017/stories/20030829001604900.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20010209084245/http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/MONITOR/ISSUE3-3/lns.html to http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/MONITOR/ISSUE3-3/lns.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:56, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I have removed this line from the article sourced to Neville Maxwell:
(I suppose the citation is wrong and the editor wanted to cite Maxwell's book.) The statement is the usual cherry-picked claptrap from Maxwell and is not directly relevant to the topic of this article.
Parshotham Mehra says in a book review:
We see this selective cherry-picking here. Maxwell, who covered India throughout the 1950s as a BBC journalist, surely knew that Sikkim was a protectorate of India and Bhutan was a protected state of India. With some discretion, he might have also known how to distinguish between what is shown as part of India and what is shown in relation to India, like the map on the right here. But informing his readers of such niceties is not part of his plan.
Nor does he want to tell any truths remotely resembling these:
Hmm... Ladakhis as well. Oh, my!
I count 26 citations to Maxwell on this page, roughly 20% of all citations. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 01:18, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maxwell claptrap