Talk:India–Pakistan cricket rivalry

message: we are missing details about the twenty20 matches. Both teams played each other twice and once in the finals. There is no information about this  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.150.44.160 (talk) 21:39, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Twenty20 

message: The entire article is biased, depending on the nationality of whoever wrote what bit. The article does not come anywhere near Wikipedia's quality standards. Grammatical mistakes, non-neutrality, hyperbole, and stupidity is replete in the article and equally distributed across contributions from both countries. Harish.alagappa (talk) 06:02, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Bias and Lack of Quality

message: In the Memorable moments (Pakistan) please add this:
"At Kolkata in 1989, India breathed a sigh of relief when they dismissed Miandad cheaply during another Pakistan run-chase and Pakistan were left standing at 161/5 needing 77 runs of nearly 6 overs. But like a bolt from the blue came Salim Malik, who smashed 72 from 36 balls from No. 7 and shepherded the tailenders past the target."
Mohammadahadgul (talk) 18:12, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Non-neutral wording. Please make more neutral, then submit another edit request. Also, please make sure to include a reliable source citation. Thank you. – Ajltalk 20:31, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request from Mohammadahadgul, 28 March 2011 

message: I'm moving the two section on 'memorable moments' to this talk page because it was largely unsourced, was poorly written, and looked to have POV issues. Nev1 (talk) 18:18, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Memorable moments

message: * In the 1986 Australasia cup final in Sharjah, Chetan Sharma, famous for getting a hat-trick in a 1987 World-Cup, was about to bowl the last ball of the match with Pakistan needing four runs to win. He bowled a low full-toss outside the leg-stump, which was hit for six by Javed Miandad. This made Sharma a villain in the eyes of Indian fans, while Miandad was hailed as a hero.
* In the first test match of the Pakistan-India test series in 1999 India needed 271 runs to win in the fourth innings. With only Tendulkar putting up resistance, with his dismissal and the score on 254, Pakistan tightened the screws and forced an Indian collapse winning the test match by 12 runs.
*In a test match at Niaz Stadium, Hyderabad (Pakistan) on 14 January 1983. Javed Miandad scored an unbeaten 280* for Pakistan against 83' World Cup wining side of India and as a result Pakistan beat India.
* The 1999 tri series in Australia was a famous one for Pakistan. Although Pakistan did not win the series they were able to beat rivals India in 3 out of the 4 matches they played against India.
* A sledging incident involving Javed Miandad and Kiran More where Miandad famously imitated More during a match by jumping up and down on the pitch. A scene questionable, but equally hilarious.
* Saeed Anwar struck a superb 194 against India in Chennai, India in 1997. The match was won by Pakistan. It is one of the greatest innings played by a batsman in an ODI breaking Sir Viv Richards previous record of 189*.
* Opening batsmen Saeed Anwar struck a match winning 188* against India in the Asian Test Championship in 1999 in India. Pakistan went on to win the match due to this knock.
* In the Wills trophy final played in Sharjah, Aaqib Javed claimed a hat-trick against India with his best bowling figures of 7/37 off 10 overs. It's the only hat-trick in Cricket in which all three batsmen were out lbw. Aaqib, only 19 years and 81 days at the time, remains the youngest cricketer to accomplish this feat.
* During the third and final match of the 1997 ODI series between India and Pakistan, which was level at 1–1, Ijaz Ahmed completely dominated the Indian attack smashing 139 not out off only 84 balls. His brutal onslaught which included 9 sixes and 10 fours helped Pakistan chase down a target of 216 in a mere 26.2 overs with 9 wickets remaining.
* The first test match of the Asian Test Championship played at Eden Gardens, Calcutta from 16–20 February 1999 is arguably the most controversial test encounter the two nations have ever played. The match was and has remained the best-attended cricket match in history with total attendance of around 465,000 people. The game is particularly remembered due to the extraordinary performances by Pakistan's Shoaib Akhtar for 4/71 and 4/47, Saeed Anwar for 188 not out for batting throughout the second innings. Controversy ensued when Tendulkar was run out in the second innings to which the Indian crowd reacted angrily to. It resulted in them causing a riot and the police and officials having to remove most of the crowd and the remainder of the test having to be watched with the stadium near empty, Pakistan eventually won the test by 46 runs.
* Pakistan defeated India in the second match of the Carlton and United Series on 10 January 2000, with Waqar Younis and Saqlain Mushtaq making a 43 run partnership and scoring the winning runs off the last ball of the match.
* Pakistan won their first ever win in an ICC event against India in the 2004 Champions Trophy in England. With Mohammad Yousuf (Yousaf Youhanna at that time) struck a beautiful knock of 81* and took Pakistan to the winning line.
* In the 2003 Videocon Cup, in Amsterdam, Shahid Afridi before the start of the match claimed that Irfan Patan was no match for him and he would hit a 6 off the first ball. Shahid Afridi came with Yasir Hameed as the opening pair to the match, and Irfan Patan was the opening bowler. Yasir Hameed made 1 run and rotated the strike to Shahid Afridi, in which he smashed a 6 off Irfan Patan. The ball landed outside of the stadium and was lost in the nearby stream and a new ball had be brought in....
* Salman Butt scored five out of seven centuries of his career against the arch-rivals India. He scored his debut century against India at BCCI's Platinum Jubilee Celebration in 2005 at Eden Garden Calcutta which Pakistan won by six wickets.
* In the fifth ODI in Kanpur, 15 April 2005 Shahid Afridi smashed a 45 ball century making him first and third on the list of fastest centuries in ODI cricket (moved down to fourth after Mark Boucher's 44 ball century in 2006).
* In the 2006 Karachi test, Pakistan came back from 39/6 in the first innings to win the match convincingly by 341 runs. Thanks to Kamran Akmal's knock of 113 in the first innings and Mohammad Asif's figures of 7/126.
* Pakistan won a memorable 2006 series in India. After losing the first two ODI's, Pakistan went on to win the next 4 ODI's clinically claiming the series 4–2. It was a famous win for Pakistan as they were hinted as the weakest Pakistani team to tour India.
* Pakistan beat India in 2009 edition of Champions Trophy by 54 runs.}}
Pakistan beat India by 180 runs in 2017 ICC CHAMPIONS TROPHY FINAL  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 39.37.142.176 (talk) 17:26, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Memorable moments (Pakistan)

message: Enigma05 (talk) 22:49, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ridiculous 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on India–Pakistan cricket rivalry. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add  after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
*Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.nytimes.com/2005/03/07/sports/07iht-cricket.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:51, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Substituted at 18:53, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment

message: Anuragrana18 (talk) 15:12, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone please undo the above user's last edit to the article. Thank you. 117.192.5.135 (talk) 15:17, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: They can't edit the page, so how could it be undone? —MRD2014 ( T  /  C ) 22:44, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 18 June 2017 

message: Please update the ODI record with result of the 2 latest matches played as part of the ongoing Asia cup.
Result summary
Team	   Mat	  Won	Lost	Tied	NR
India	   131	  54	73	0	4
http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/records/team/results_summary.html?class=2;id=6;id=7;type=headtohead Sandykop (talk) 08:46, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: The page's protection level has changed since this request was placed. You should now be able to edit the page yourself. If you still seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details.--B dash (talk) 02:44, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 24 September 2018 

message: Per MOS:FLAGS I've removed flags again from the article. They aren't needed here - if we had lots of different countries then perhaps; we don't. 
Colour is a bar to web accessibility - it stops users with accessibility issues being able to read the page, especially tables, effectively. Please don't re-add it. Blue Square Thing (talk) 06:37, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: ^this needs to be read. It's important. Blue Square Thing (talk) 19:32, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flags and colour 

message: THIS IS WRONG AND FACK NEWS. 2405:205:C8E7:74AD:A502:A159:B4C9:212 (talk) 03:50, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Cannolis (talk) 05:20, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 29 October 2021 

message: The main summary article box is showing T20I wins for Pakistan 6 and India 2 whereas it should be the reverse with "India 6 and Pakistan 2". This is obviously not an unintentional error. I am not sure how but this article will likely need an higher locking tier in the future. Changing the statistics here wont change the actual record for whoever keeps making this changes.
:Thanks. That was someone being an idiot. I've reverted it. Blue Square Thing (talk) 16:39, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Or thought I had, but failed dismally and reverted someone who'd made the change. This is half the problem with stats based articles imo... Blue Square Thing (talk) 16:41, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

text: Well, as I wrote it, I doubt that'll be an issue. I think the section probably needs more historical context and some balance - did one of the old Pakistani bowlers (don't recall which one) also do something stupid on social media recently? The whole cricket diplomacy bit probably needs stuff added about as well - it's in the lead so we should have it in the article body as well. Given the importance of the sport in southern Asia and the way in which the two countries have interacted through it beyond the cricket pitch, I think this is probably important to have in the article. Blue Square Thing (talk) 16:39, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

text: I'm not quite sure that I follow the argument here. How would you rewrite the section? Blue Square Thing (talk) 16:39, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correction and a suggestion on "9	Wider public reaction to the rivalry" 

message: Under summary of results, where the tournament wins by each side are listed, the World Championship of Cricket is not listed. India had won the tournament, Pakistan has not. I also think adding test maces would be a positive change to the article. India has 6 to their name, Pakistan has 1. 
World Championship of Cricket - https://www.espncricinfo.com/series/benson-hedges-world-championship-of-cricket-1984-85-60849/india-vs-pakistan-final-65731/full-scorecard Stright16 (talk) 20:27, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tournament Missing 

message: The article is about sports and the there is a line in the lede "After each terrorist attack in India, it was revealed that these terrorist attacks were planned by Pakistan, ISI, and Pakistan-based terrorist organisations."
It completely fails WP:NPOV and WP:UNDUE. Also the sources appended are mostly from Indian websites and content of the sources in question appears to contain extremely biased or inflammatory language, and does not meet the standard for reliable and neutral sources. The line has to be removed from the lede in the very least. 39.41.180.160 (talk) 19:05, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Violation of WP:NPOV and WP:DUE as well as WP:COATRACK.