lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Kussmaul breathing

message: "..presence or absence of.." is a tautology. Please clarify.
Jimmy Hers (talk) 18:55, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Liver enlargement 

message: I've read that pregnant women show Kussmaul breathing, but this article does not explain why (or even mention it).  —anon
Pregnancy is not the cause..may be some other underlying cause Kapilgarg81 (talk) 05:48, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Pregnancy

message: What is the opposite of Kussmaul breathing, i.e. short, shallow, slow breaths (as opposed to shallow but fast breathing, which is a third condition)? All three conditions (are there more?) should link to each other in "See also" sections so that readers can navigate easily between the articles and compare/contrast the conditions. — SMcCandlish   Talk⇒ ʕ(Õلō)ˀ  Contribs. 21:33, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Anecdotal reply: I have an occasional breathing pattern (happening now and the reason why I'm reading these articles on respiration) in which my breaths become short, shallow and slow for a while. This leads to a need for a sudden deep breath (presumably due to an excess of CO2 in the blood) which is followed by apnoea for several seconds after which the shallow breathing restarts. This occurs without consciousness. Bringing attention to my breath and trying to breath "properly" doesn't seem to help much or for long. From reading the Cheyne-Stokes respiration article, it sounds somewhat similar to that pattern but ten minutes of reading does not an expert make so I make no claim of a diagnosis. What I'm suggesting, however, is that short, shallow, slow breathing could not be maintained unless it's entirely adequate (presumably the body would be very much at rest), thus it's likely to be part of a larger pattern. 79.79.248.65 (talk) 13:00, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Opposite
Talk:1978 Georgian demonstrations

message: No problem with that starts to every one which is a timeline of the smart kids   have a   celebration 🦊 41.116.90.39 (talk) 18:30, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think anyone has the slightest idea from that gibberish what you are trying to say - do you have a Reliable Source to discuss to improve the article? HammerFilmFan (talk) 19:47, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  English languages...
Talk:The Lantern Bearers (Sutcliff novel)

message: A well deserved award. Her books are good. I haven't read them all but of those that I have read this was the best. The sibling "reunion" in the latter part of the novel is particularly poignant. The writing and the issues raised make this a book of interest to all readers, not just young adults. -- Derek Ross | Talk 07:07, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Carnegie medal

message: Here and at Rosemary Sutcliff I have introduced as a source [ref name=taliesin] the 1986 "Modern Arthurian Literature" interview. I have barely utilized it --here only concerning the children/adult and the Arthurian dimensions of classifying the novel. It should be used intensively, at least concerning influences and origins. --P64 (talk) 00:38, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Interview
Talk:Die Ärzte (1986 album)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Celia Homeford (talk) 13:46, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Die Ärzte (album) →  – Repeating the RM of 2010: "There's more, e.g. Die Ärzte (2002 album), so necessary to be more precise here." After 11 years, someone boldly moved it back a few years ago (without even bothering to provide an edit summary).  should either redirect to Die Ärzte or there should be a dab page created at Die Ärzte (disambiguation) as previously suggested. The pageview ratio is only about 3:1, plus there is . —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 12:22, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 26 April 2024
Talk:Warrawong, New South Wales

message: While this will always be a subjective determination, I do not think that this article is correct in saying that "Warrawong is known to locals as the upper-class part of the Wollongong area."
I have lived in Wollongong all of my life and in justifying my opinion I would point out that Warrawong is next to Port Kembla, the rusting industrial heart of the city. Many of its houses were built for the workers in the BHP steel works and these are mostly small fibro cottages. 
The area is not considered wealthy or exclusive. --Mckinlayr 10:11, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Wombarra, New South Wales

message: doesn't double r harden the a, barr as in barrow, not like far ? wom-barr-ah, not wom-bahr-ah ? but, ask the locals Dave Rave (talk) 09:54, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: parramatta, cabramatta, not pah-ra-matta Dave Rave (talk) 09:55, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  sound it out
Talk:Wollongong Showground

message: The issue of renaming stadium articles was previously discussed twice at Wikipedia:Australian Wikipedians' notice board. These discussions are now archived at Wikipedia:Australian Wikipedians' notice board/Archive 28#Stadium naming and Wikipedia:Australian Wikipedians' notice board/Archive 30#Stadium naming pt 2. Consensus to move this article to Wollongong Showground was reached during the second discussion. Therefore, a move now should be uncontroversial. --AussieLegend (talk) 13:09, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Move completed due to consensus reached here and [[here.  The Windler  talk  07:50, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 
Talk:Crown Street, Wollongong

message: Note: There is a proposal at WT:AURD#Move_articles_to_bracket_disambiguation to rename this article (and others) to conform to the WP:AURDNAME guideline – specifically, using brackets instead of a comma for disambiguation. - Evad37 [talk] 08:42, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation style
Talk:First-generation warfare

message: Alternatively, it has been argued that the Peace of Westphalia did not solidify the power of the nation-state, but that the Thirty Years' War itself ushered in an era of large-scale combat that was simply too costly for smaller mercenary groups to carry out on their own. According to this theory, smaller groups chose to leave mass combat—and the expenses associated with it—in the domain of the nation-state. (Above misread's the source - "the Thirty Years’ War itself showed that war had become extremely costly to wage, even for major powers.28 Thus, the sheer expense of organized armed conﬂict tended to push it beyond the capacity of smaller states and many nonstate actors, who sought to avoid it except, of course, to participate as mercenaries." p. 9. The state is a concept going back to at least the 16th century, while the nation-state becomes key starting around 1789.) - 24.231.54.204
:There doesn't seem to be any misreading of the source; the source disputes the idea that, after Westphalia, mass combat was left to nation-states. But the US Army is not the end-all authority on military history and theory; the idea does exist, disputed or otherwise, and is worth mentioning. I don't think two sentences is undue weight. Kafziel Complaint Department: Please take a number 22:19, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved from article
Talk:Chris Hani Secondary School

message: Victuallers 10:32, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Crawford College, Durban

message: Victuallers 10:37, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Crawford College, La Lucia

message: Victuallers 10:37, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

message: Crawford College, La lucia started in 1999. During the construction and early years there was huge floods in the area because the school is built on valley.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pegthepegger (talk • contribs) 07:17, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Begginings 
Talk:St Botolph's Aldgate

message: Please see the article on Henry Grey, 1st Duke of Suffolk regarding the survival of his mummified head, which was moved from Holy Trinity to St. Botolph's in 1899. The history I've found takes it up only to 1920. What with the Blitz and the 1965 fire, do any of you Londoners happen to know if the head is still in existence? --Michael K SmithTalk  12:51, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: The Head of the Duke of Suffolk
Talk:Maru-a-Pula School

message: mid as rare for this country. more ? pics? Victuallers 10:43, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: I am a student of Maru-a-Pula School and I find this page about my school too short for people to learn more about it. It is nesecery for us to add imformations about number of students/staffs,annual activities, rooms and any other basic imformations--张雨涵 (talk) 15:39, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expanding content
Talk:Mobile (TV series)

message: Removed spam advertising link * Mobile TV
86.5.117.70 (talk) 10:15, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed Spam Advertising Link 

message: I have expanded this slightly, attempting to explain a little bit about the plot and characters involved. However, I'm not sure whether I have the name of the detective accurate. If anybody knows for certain, perhaps they could edit the article and make the necessary corrections. Thanks. Brochco (talk) 13:16, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  I expanded this
Talk:Monisha Unni

message: Why is Monisha's name is in Kannada and not in Malayalam ? --Anoopkn (talk) 18:30, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Conservatory Water

message: www.centralpark.com is one of several websites dedicated to Central Park. Someone is passing from page to page, carefully deleting this link. Rather than get involved in some rixe over this, I'm leaving it deleted. Before someone was inclined to delete it, without a word to anyone, as "spam", it should have been carefully looked at. --Wetman (talk) 18:44, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: www.centralpark.com

message: I am curious as to why this sculpture doesn't have its own article? It is very famous and there is plenty of coverage to justify a larger article. SmileyFacedShogun (talk) 21:11, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alice in Wonderland Sculpture
Talk:Godfearers

message: Many thanks especially to User:Timothygough for fleshing out this topic so interestingly. 82.6.114.172 10:58, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've added some information here. I don't feel it's necessary to cite any new sources, as Tucker's article handles this topic nicely. This is a fairly generally accepted summary of this group.
D.Lacasse (talk) 07:11, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Content 

message: Why is the Bible template included on this page? This article is not about or related to the Bible. If no one disagrees I will delete it.
--Editor2020 (talk) 00:11, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bible template 

message: I blanked the portion of the article which was copied from a webpage. While I generally assume good faith, when it comes to matters of copyvio, we must side on respecting the owner of the content. Anyone can come along and make a username to claim to be an online blogger, and there is no way for us to verify that fact. We have the OTRS system in place to deal with such matters. If users want the full text, or portions restored, they must have verification that the copyright holder has released the content under the GFDL (adding a GFDL licensing on the blog can be substituted in lieu of OTRS). That said, I feel the content is problematic for a number of reasons. It is filled with one person's original conclusions, and thus violates WP:NOR. While there are some references to scholars here and there, it is almost a hopeless task for us to try to track down in-line citations for all the content. On top of that, the tone and overall prose needs much refining for it to be encyclopedic. -Andrew c [talk] 21:58, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio 

message: Is "Godfearers" a Christian or Jewish term, or both?
"Godfearers" appears in the Christian New Testament and is primarly a Christian term. It is not primarly a Jewish term, but it is a topic of Jewish discussion, such as in the Jewish Encyclopedia. 75.15.199.116 (talk) 19:46, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Many words appear in the New Testament that are not Christian terms. The word refers to a Jewish concept, for which there is no Christian equivalent. Why would it be a Christian term? DJ Clayworth (talk) 19:47, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There appear to be only two references cited by this article. The Journal of Biblical Studies and F. F. Bruce. Those are both Christian sources. Obviously, this is primarily a Christian term. 75.15.199.116 (talk) 19:51, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point. Is it possible that the Jews have another name for it? DJ Clayworth (talk) 19:53, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

text: That would be useful information to add to the article. Then the article becomes more than just about Christian usage. DJ Clayworth (talk) 20:08, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Category:Christian terms
Talk:Trans World Sport

message: We ought to have more on this, Transworld Sport is something of an institution! I remember watching it as a child if I was up at about 6 or 7 in the morning. Can anyone find when it started, who's involved in its production, if it's a foreign programme that's given English commentary for UK audiences (I don't recall ever seeing the presenters, just a constant stream of video clips with voice-overs), etc? 84.13.132.115 11:00, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion request
Talk:Serena (wife of Stilicho)

message: This article makes no sense at all.--BSkliarWard 11:01, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: As Theodosius was an only child, and his mother Thermantia was his father's first and only wife, Serena's mother or father must have been from an earlier marriage of Thermantia, thus making her only a half-niece of Theodosius. (Theodosius was not an only child. He had an elder brother, Honorius,who had two daughters, Serena and Thermantia, both of whom were adopted by Theodosius and taken by him to Constantinople when his brother died.)
I have removed this paragraph from the article. It contains two conflicting statements, neither of which is referenced or sourced. Either version of reality may be reinserted into the article when soures are provided. If sources say both, then the conflicting accounts can be mentioned, with appropriate sources. --Iacobus 05:48, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Found information on Serena's parentage, inserting in article with reference. --Iacobus (talk) 23:58, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Theodosius an only child? 

message: If the sack happened in August 410, why would Serena be executed for the matter in 409? PrehistoricWalker (talk) 00:17, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: She was executed a year before the Goths sacked Rome at a time when Alaric was blockading the city, causing a foot shortage. Olympiodorus of Thebes wrote she "was thought to be the reason for Alaric's march on Rome". RMcPhillip (talk) 22:03, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death year?
Talk:Roughness length

message: It seems silly to me to tag this page as 'unclear to many readers'.  The subject of this page is a technical concept, and demands a technical explanation.  The page seems to me to be well written, and as simple as possible given its subject.
I entirely agree - it is a somewhat difficult concept which is only really of interest to those taking a fairly detailed interest in atmospheric physics. About the only thing I would add are some typical values for different terrain etc with the corresponding wind profiles over say 0 to 10 metres. Colin Mill (talk) 11:04, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening heading

message: e.g. The logarithmic velocity profile U=\frac{U_*}{\kappa}ln\left(\frac{z}{z_0}\right) guiltyspark (talk) 21:44, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs section on fluid applications
Template talk:Lacking ISBN

message: It would be a good idea if this also added articles to a category, by month, as does  Andy Mabbett 11:04, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Category

message: I have created a new template, , based on this one, for lists of books that lack not only ISBNs, but author, publisher and/ or date of publication. Andy Mabbett | Talk to Andy Mabbett 14:23, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  new template - Biblio 

message: The tool that add ISBNs automatically links to no longer works. --Guthrie (talk) 19:53, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: And it's still down eight months later. I'll remove the link. --McGeddon (talk) 10:27, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

text: Actually, the bot seems to have moved to http://toolserver.org/~verisimilus/Bot/DOI_bot/doibot.php, so I've fixed the link instead. --McGeddon (talk) 10:31, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  tool not working 

message: It would be great if this template looked up the rest of the information for the reference based solely on the ISBN. This would eliminate innumerable typos, missing info, etc. A second parameter (beyond the number) would be a page #/range. ISBNdb.com provides a REST API for such a purpose. Lfstevens (talk) 18:28, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Look up the link contents using the isbn 

message: A bad ISBN formerly -- a couple of months ago? -- generated a red link. Is that still the case? Varlaam (talk) 09:34, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad ISBNs 

message: I just added a tracking category, :Category:Articles using the ISBN template incorrectly, to find incorrect uses of the form .  the primary source seems to be from people translating articles from other languages (e.g., French) where :fr:Modèle:ISBN does something different.  we should consider renaming this template to  or something more descriptive. Frietjes (talk) 15:50, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Frietjes I totally agree. -- Magioladitis (talk) 18:45, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename this template 

message: Greetings and felicitations.  The template's code includes the option to make the template specific to an article's section, but this is not mentioned in the documentation.  Would someone please be so kind as to add a mention of this? —DocWatson42 (talk) 16:51, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Adding you as you were the last editor to work on this template and are still active. —DocWatson42 (talk) 23:20, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request: Update the documentation
Talk:Lemko Republic

message: Regarding maps:  the Paul Magocsi article references "The Origins of the Lems, Slavs of Danubian Provenance: Memorandum to the Peace Conference Concerning Their National Claims (Paris, 1919)" with a "fold out map".  This might be a definitive version of the greatest extent of territory claimed by the republic,  I can not find a copy.  OCLC is 235988962.  You could claim that the republic actually governed the Lemko-speaking ares of the north slopes of the Carpathians, west of the Dukla Pass,or perhaps west of the San  in the southern parts of the Galician counties of Nowy Sacz, Grybow, and Gorlice.Pustelnik 02:03, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This area was definitely part of Austria-Hungary before WW I.  Why is someone trying to delete this flag?  Please explain.Pustelnik (talk) 12:52, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Former Flag

message: The map showing the location of the republic looks quite odd, as if taken from a computer game or so. The area that is supposed to show the lemko republic would rather be the western part of Galicia, even extending into Silesia. That can't be quite right. I will try to get a better map at some point. -- Hierakares (talk) 09:20, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map inaccurate 

message: There are 2 image files with the name "Flag Of The Republic Of Lemko" On Commons, one is in Russian posted in 2015, and the other is from 2019, with the name in English, which one is the correct flag and which font?. 
 Jaztie não é árabe (talk) 22:05, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It is possible that one is the flag of the West Lemko Republic or Komancza Republic, which wanted to join West Ukraine, however was invaded by poland. 47.229.144.239 (talk) 02:45, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which is the correct flag?
Talk:Istanbul Agop Cymbals

message: Despite what the brochures may claim and music shop assistants may tell you in good faith, any metallurgist (or probably anyone with significant training in any branch of chemistry) will tell you that it is not nowadays possible to keep a cymbal alloy secret. Sorry! Andrewa (talk) 10:56, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Secret alloys
Talk:Manteno State Hospital

message: The Morgan cottage was demolished several years ago around 2015. I grew up exploring this place and am very familiar with the history and the buildings. 50.44.68.146 (talk) 13:47, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Morgan cottage
Talk:London Buses route 114

message: It's not possible to verify any of the statements in this article as it does not cite the sources from which it was drawn.  Wikipedia's Key Policy 6 - reliable sources - places justifiable emphasis on this to avoid the inclusion of original research, factual error, or inadvertent copyright violation.
A very simple solution is for the original editor to include the sources from which the article was drawn, and thus give these their due credit. --apc 11:22, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not trying to get rid of the page, but it is important that it gives a direct credit and reference to the source of the information on it.  Specifically, the information box and the route listing - these are identical to information on another website.  Wherever these entries come from, the source needs to be approached for permission to reproduce them, and if it is granted, credit clearly given.  This needn't be a big deal - it's quite likely that they'll give you permission without any trouble.  There's even a standard Wikipedia copyright request form you can use.  But if the page is left like this, there is a risk that the original source will complain about copyright violation and deletion will swiftly follow.  That would be a significant problem, as the information boxes and many of the route listings for other routes seem to use the same source without crediting it.  --apc 15:10, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Bangladesh Liberation War

message: It is not known how much Paramilitary forces were there, but a source tells us 280,000 on the West Pakistan and East Pakistani Collaborators, we don't know how much were in this conflict, but the whole number 280,000 has been put up. RevolutionaryPatriot (talk) 00:50, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paramilitary Force Number is Unknown but still featured on the infobox 

message: Why is the UK listed? The Box should only be kept with the 3 powers, Soviets, US and Chinese. The UK i understand were selling weapons to both India and Pakistan, it did not support a party against another, certainly not Pakistan against its own insurgency either. I don't think mere sale of weapons was this particular article's rule precedent policy for listing a country in the support by section. RevolutionaryPatriot (talk) 19:25, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Support Box  

message: Add this movie at section In popular culture because is the only one I was able to find in English and watched
Pippa (2023)
Link: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pippa_(film) KnowledgeKeeper161 (talk) 05:52, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion