lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Plasma Pong

message: 'Unfortunately' seems like a pretty strong value judgment.  Why not say 'fortunately' instead?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.4.139.149 (talk) 18:56, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Soviet Unterzoegersdorf

message: Added media references, reviews. 
Removed notability mark. Any further references needed? K-pachs (talk) 13:17, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The intro paragraph currently includes this:
Debates triggered by postmodern culture have directed monochrom's attention towards questions of representation and relevance of "history" and stories. With Soviet Unterzoegersdorf a fictitious and misplaced handling of the past and the present is being discussed and put to use. In this regard, the project is also taking part in the production as well as the criticism of cultural and collective memories.
Monochrom transformed the basic theoretical concept into various projects.
To which my first response is "WTF?"
This text does not belong in an introduction. It is more a review of the product. It sounds like it  has been lifted from a website, or even an essay about the game. And it's POV.
82.39.226.226 (talk) 12:17, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The intro 
Talk:Spawn installation

message: What would be the best way to word an analogy between spawn installations and DS Download Play? --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 00:53, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  DS Download Play 

message: That game had an option to "install a network-only copy" 31.181.108.0 (talk) 05:33, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colin McRee 2.0 (2002) 

message: Clonk Rage requires purchase to enable extensions and the ability to host network games. However, if extensions are enabled in the hosted scenario and the host allows free players, any free player can enter that game. 31.181.108.0 (talk) 05:52, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clonk Rage
Talk:Eram Garden

message: Eram is  an ancient lost city in Rubaa Al Khali (the Empty Quarter) desert in the South of the Arabian Peninsula, mentioned in Koran as "Eram Dhat Al Emaad" or  "Eram (one) With the Pillars" meaning a city with lofty buildings, which was built & populated by an Arabian tribe, extinct now, called 'Aad' in 'Al Ahqaaf' area, not known now. They were destroyed along with their city by a sandstorm in a direct punishment from God, when they rejected the Prophet Houd sent to them to guide them to His Paradise in the Hereafter. Eram does not mean paradise. Q:89:6.  Q:69:6-8, Quran.com Ilaila (talk) 20:44, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eram 
Talk:Luna (tree)

message: There is an inconsistency regarding when "Luna" was vandalized.  The article on Julia Hill says it was attacked in 2000, the artle on "Luna" says 2001.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.135.50.134 (talk) 21:28, 25 August 2007‎ (UTC) 
:True, I did notice an inconsistency; newspaper articles confirm 2001.Alexriehl13 (talk) 01:09, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Several articles state that Thanksgiving weekend 2000 was when they first noticed that Luna was vandalized.  2001 was when the bracings and cablings were put on.  CoffeeSweet  03:37, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: *It's fixed now in the article!  Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:48, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of vandalism

message: How old is Luna? This article says 600-1000, the article Julia Butterfly Hill says 1500.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.104.39.2 (talk) 21:02, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: *Luna is about 1000 years old according to most of the references in the article including Ms. Hill's book. :)  Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:48, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age
Talk:Ted Frank

message: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ted_Frank&type=revision&diff=739233160&oldid=734717321 
For some reason, people have been adding incorrect edits so that the page ceases to identify my correct employer. The article embarrassingly focuses on several non-notable cases while ignoring national press coverage for much bigger victories and accomplishments. Many many sources at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Collect#Ted_Frank if someone would like to edit this mess of an article, which Wikipedia for some reason calls "good." at this point, it's so misleading as to be a real BLP issue, especially because I've seenreporters who rely on this nonsense instead of reality . Theodore H. Frank (talk) 12:11, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: It's really unfair to me how badly out of date this article and the CCAF article is and I can't dare edit it. Theodore H. Frank (talk) 05:08, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, new home page and photo. https://cei.org/content/ted-frank Theodore H. Frank (talk) 05:26, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wildly out of date 

message: «Frank objected to the settlement on the basis of being one of the estimated 129 million Google users in the United States. Google has called Frank a “professional objector.”» https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-usa-court-google/u-s-supreme-court-to-hear-google-privacy-settlement-dispute-idUKKBN1I11G0?il=0
Does this fit somewhere in the article? --Nemo 15:12, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for your suggestion. When you believe an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes.  Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the edit this page link at the top. The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills.  New contributors are always welcome. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons you might want to).  TJRC (talk) 23:45, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Google case
Talk:Shit Creek Review

message: This entry was nominated for deletion on the grounds that the topic lacked notability and violated Geogre's Law.
On notablility: "In general, the text of an article should include enough information to explain why the person [orin this case entity] is notable" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(people). I believe the article clearly does that already, but I will add more material to that effect. One criterion posited for 'notability' is 'The person has demonstrable wide name recognition': "Shit Creek review" currently yields 2680 Google hits, and is widely referred to and discussed on online poetry forums. Furthermore it provides pdf archives of its editions and has a stated policy of producing an annual print edition. It includes articles and poetry by well-known published poets and writers such as A.E. Stallings, R.S. Gwynn, Tim Murphy, Alan Sullivan, Rhina Espaillat, Lee Passarella, Wendy Videlock, Robert Clawson and many others. It is frequently cited as a publishing credential by authors both online and in print. As to the comment 'Only an online magazine': is it then proposed to eliminate the entire category 'Literature Websites'?
Addressing the issue of Geogre's Law: 'Geogre's Law: A law attributed to User:Geogre and most frequently referred to in Articles for deletion. Paraphrased, the law states that there exists a strong correlation between the lack of proper capitalization of a person's name in the title of a biographical article, and the failure of the subject of that article to satisfy the criteria for inclusion of biographies.'--If this is a fair summary, it must apply to the title: presumably because that is in quotation marks. I would appreciate some advice on how to edit the title to remove the quotation marks.
Update: I think I rectified this title issue by using 'Move Page' to move the entire article to a title without quotation marks.
Marmosite 21:36, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Tbo 157

message: User:Tbo_157
      run at Sat Aug 25 21:37:49 2007 GMT
Category:	1
Image:	2
Mainspace	714
Portal talk:	3
Portal:	149
Talk:	97
Template talk:	1
Template:	18
User talk:	306
User:	38
Wikipedia talk:	89
Wikipedia:	220
avg edits per page	3.38
earliest	18:03, 13 April 2007
number of unique pages	484
total	1638
2007/4 	21 	
2007/5 	1 	
2007/6 	62 	
2007/7 	770 	
2007/8 	784 	
Tbo_157's editcount summary stats as of 22:35, August 25th 2007, using Interiot's wannabe Kate's tool. (aeropagitica) 21:39, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:The Look of Love (ABC song)

message: Should mention the music video, with its Edwardian / Music Hall / Mary Poppins chalk painting sequence / Carnival sideshow / Punch-and-Judy influences... AnonMoos (talk) 02:14, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Music video

message: Not sure the man is "gorging an absurd amount of spaghetti".  He seems to find some kind of electrical plug in the spaghetti (have never understood that part). AnonMoos (talk) 01:22, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: spaghetti
Talk:WKBO

message: The following commentary was originally posted by editor "Tportzline" in 2017, and is more appropriate for the Talk page:
::Over the years, several national publications which feature historical information about radio and television stations have stated that WKBO’s original air date was prior to 1925 - as early as 1922.  However, the publishers did not cite authoritative sources for their claims, nor did they provide a detailed analysis from "day 1" to WKBO.  Because of this, some radio history enthusiasts have drawn their own conclusions by stating that WKBO is an outgrowth of one of Harrisburg’s pre-1925 stations, either WBAK or WABB, making the station older than it really is.  Nevertheless, a careful examination of federal records and local newspaper articles makes it clear that:  a) There is a direct timeline leading from present-day WKBO back to WPRC, and b) WPRC operated concurrently with WBAK, WABB and WHBG when it appeared in October 1925, proving that these stations were separate and distinct.
::To provide further clarity, WBAK existed from 1922 Evening News, April 27, 1922 to 1934 Harrisburg Telegraph, April 28, 1934 and used the same call letters throughout its 12-year duration.  (WBAK was converted to a state police dispatch station in 1934 ).  WABB operated from 1923 Harrisburg Telegraph, April 19, 1923 to as late as 1927,DOC Radio Service Bulletin, December 31, 1926 also using only one call sign.  (WABB's assets were sold at an auction in 1928 Evening News, October 27, 1928).  Because WBAK and WABB overlapped with WPRC when it arrived in 1925, and because there is no record of these stations ever sharing or exchanging call letters, ownership or management, it is reasonable to conclude that WPRC was never part of WBAK or WABB, thereby establishing October 12, 1925 as the correct original air date for WPRC and ultimately for WKBO.-- Transferred by Thomas H. White (talk) 14:02, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commentary about WKBO's origin transferred from main page
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Introductions/Archive 1

message: Hello. The WikiProject Council has recently updated the Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory.  This new directory includes a variety of categories and subcategories which will, with luck, potentially draw new members to the projects who are interested in those specific subjects. Please review the directory and make any changes to the entries for your project that you see fit. There is also a directory of portals, at User:B2T2/Portal, listing all the existing portals. Feel free to add any of them to the portals or comments section of your entries in the directory. The three columns regarding assessment, peer review, and collaboration are included in the directory for both the use of the projects themselves and for that of others. Having such departments will allow a project to more quickly and easily identify its most important articles and its articles in greatest need of improvement. If you have not already done so, please consider whether your project would benefit from having departments which deal in these matters. It is my hope that all the changes to the directory can be finished by the first of next month. Please feel free to make any changes you see fit to the entries for your project before then. If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you.   B2T2 13:53, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Project directory 

message: Hello, all. It was initially my hope to try to have this done as part of Esperanza's proposal for an appreciation week to end on Wikipedia Day, January 15. However, several people have once again proposed the entirety of Esperanza for deletion, so that might not work. It was the intention of the Appreciation Week proposal to set aside a given time when the various individuals who have made significant, valuable contributions to the encyclopedia would be recognized and honored. I believe that, with some effort, this could still be done. My proposal is to, with luck, try to organize the various WikiProjects and other entities of wikipedia to take part in a larger celebrartion of its contributors to take place in January, probably beginning January 15, 2007. I have created yet another new subpage for myself (a weakness of mine, I'm afraid) at User talk:Badbilltucker/Appreciation Week where I would greatly appreciate any indications from the members of this project as to whether and how they might be willing and/or able to assist in recognizing the contributions of our editors. Thank you for your attention.  Badbilltucker 18:51, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia Day Awards
Talk:The Beat Club

message: Hello, I am the user who created this page. I made it with a friend because we thought The Beat Club needed a page. It may seem like advertising because, well, there weren't many sources we could find. :) I am editing it to be more of an article, and would greatly appreciate a more experienced user making it up to Wikipedia's high standards of truth and quality. And making it "The Beat Club" would be nice. (No sarcasm meant there, btw XD).74.225.226.20 22:02, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: origin

message: This seems like a starter article made by unregistered users. Anyone willing to adopt this one? :)Leslie Granger (talk) 03:18, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Edits
Talk:Joel Glazer

message: Add to end of career section after “sneaker soirée in 2011”...
“In Manchester, by contrast, he is rarely seen and widely hated.”
Here’s the relevant source reference: https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/sport/football/european-super-league-joel-glazer-20415059 86.30.163.37 (talk) 21:36, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: "Widely hated" breaks our neutral point-of-view policy. Pupsterlove02 talk • contribs 21:41, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 19 April 2021 

message: Remove award "5 time premier League champion" he has never played in nor coached in the premier League. The owners of a football club to not have the claim to be a champion. 46.208.54.206 (talk) 05:30, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Specifically, reliable sources that support your second sentence. Egsan Bacon (talk) 06:57, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 22 April 2021
Talk:Raid (video games)

message: While the WP:TONE aspect of the section is easier to fix (use of 2nd person pronouns to talk to the reader), the NPOV issues are a bit worse. The entire section is written in an almost didactic manner, warning of the dangers of raiding in some games. At the very least, the opinion needs balancing, and definitely needs further substantiation in reliable sources than three posts across two blogs. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 20:32, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Health risks section 
Talk:Marcela Carena

message: My concern about notability is that the guideline that is WP:BIO has not been satisfied. Until it is satisfied, the template is appropriate. Not every scientist is notable. That even goes for the ones who do complex and admirable work as I'm sure Marcela Carena does. Erechtheus 23:00, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:BIO]]/Notability
Talk:Claiborne–Annapolis Ferry Company

message: I'm not sure what the naming conventions for historical entities are, but given that this was more recently known as the "Chesapeake Bay Ferry System", wouldn't that be a better name for the article?  There is the fact that it was known as the "Claiborne-Annapolis Ferry Company" longer, so I'm not sure which it should be called, like I said, I don't know the naming convention.  So if anyone knows which one it should be called, let me know here.-Jeff (talk) 02:53, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name? 
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/WikipedianProlific

message: Edit stats for WikipedianProlific as of Sat Aug 25 22:11:03 2007 GMT. --Boricuaeddie 22:13, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit stats

message: No doubt people will be asking me what lead me to the conclusion that there was no consensus. Well, firstly, all the arguments in the oppose section are credible and sensible, as are the arguments in the support section. However, most of the neutrals agree with the opposers, and speak of WikipedianProlific not being ready for adminship. When factoring those neutrals as opposes, it seems much less like a consensus to promote. As such, I do not believe the community has conclusively decided to promote WikipedianProlific this time. --Deskana (talky) 00:45, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  My closure
Talk:Modern Cornish

message: The extract quoted appears to be in the author's original spelling, complete with e.g. odd word divisions etc., without any modern standardisation. It is therefore an example of historic late Cornish -- actually the last extended text written by a native speaker. It is not, as is suggested, an e.g. of any of the various RLC systems devised by Gendall, Kennedy etc.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.153.100.37 (talk) 16:01, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Golden Axe

message: Wasn't his name " Death=Adder " with the equals sign ?
Just askin'  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.0.64.68 (talk) 16:59, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death Adder 

message: When I have the adequete sources i'm going to be adding a section to the main page about Gilius being involved in the TV show 'Good Game'. If anyone has objections feel free to edit the post before I put it up around December 2012.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by HistoryJet (talk • contribs) 00:26, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gilius in popular media 

message: The redirect Golden Axe (series has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Utopes (talk / cont) 06:59, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Golden Axe (series]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Far Cry

message: Jack Carver redirects here so I added more discussion specific to the character.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.134.45.218 (talk) 05:07, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 1 

message: If the first three games share a similar or even same senario, please indicate this.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.1.136.164 (talk) 14:05, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 2 

message: has already provided multiple reliable secondary sources to show this, both in the article and on 's talk page. With so many sources calling it a spin off, that's what we need to show here. The fact that not every source states clearly "spin off" is irrelevant, unless they are specifically referring to it as a part of the main series, which has not been demonstrated. -- ferret (talk) 12:08, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you stupid too? How many webpages are going to deliberately say "This game is a part of the main series". You wouldn't even see that in Call of Duty or AC. 207.161.234.95 (talk) 12:14, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Because reliable sources recognize games like Unity as a main installment instead of a spin-off. Whether we are stupid or not is not important. WP:V is the most important one here. AdrianGamer (talk) 12:28, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Far Cry Primal as a spinoff. 

message: I feel like this should be added 2001:569:BE3C:3200:7CE2:44F5:C0EC:929D (talk) 19:39, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Added as a callout in the FC3: BD section, but I would not elevate it as a "title' in the FC series. --Masem (t) 19:45, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trials of the Blood Dragon 

message: I have made a draft for Far Cry 7, if anyone is interested they're free to add to it. ★Trekker (talk) 22:53, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Draft for 7th game
Talk:Andrew Duncan

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Andrew Duncan (Disambiguation) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 24#Andrew Duncan (Disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Steel1943 (talk) 16:50, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Andrew Duncan (Disambiguation)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Church of All Saints, Yekaterinburg

message: There is a statue of a couple carrying what appears to be a flag in front of the church. Can anyone offer any information as to what it represents? When it was erected, by whom, etc.? Thanks, Dr. Dan (talk) 05:02, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Statue 
Talk:Bachke Rehna Re Baba

message: I have no idea why it does not appear the IMDb link from the infobox, although it is added. Desiphral-देसीफ्राल 22:31, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Solved, a small syntax problem. Desiphral-देसीफ्राल 23:21, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Artaxerex

message: I note Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Artaxerex, which shows use of multiple accounts. At Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Confirmed sockpuppets, request for block one admin determined that there is no current reason to block any of the accounts because of this.  GRBerry 04:29, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That thread is now at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive285#Confirmed sockpuppets, request for block inter user sniping appeared in the thread after I note it; I don't see any admin saying that they cared.  GRBerry 18:41, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Statement by GRBerry 

message: I have made a statement about this whole case here. Let me just make clear that Artaxerex does not deserve to be banned. Although he did make some mistakes initially when he first joined wikipedia, many of the subsequents accusations against him are unfair. I am very impressed with his knowledge about the subjects he edits and hope he will continue at wikipedia. --- Melca 19:53, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Statement by Melca