lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/FAs first

message: WP1.0 editorial team discussions – Core topics discussions – Wiki sort discussions – Work via WikiProjects discussions – Pushing to 1.0 discussions
I thought I'd try to something to encourage a review of FAs.  What does everyone think of this? Tuf-Kat 03:47, 28 October 2005 (UTC)

message: What about the featured lists, featured pictures etc? Will they be part of V1.0? Sorry if this question is answered somewhere already and I missed it, I haven't encountered this project before. Soo 14:31, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured lists etc 

message: This list is quite a bit out of date, as articles that have been de-featured still appear here, as well as articles that have been featured in the last 6 months. Perhaps getting a bot to help out would be a good idea? Titoxd(?!? - help us) 06:30, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Getting a bot to help out IS a good idea. --Siva1979Talk to me 19:17, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incomplete list? 

message: Is this project still active? It could be good to put an update at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team. Thanks. Maurreen 19:06, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Status

message: I'm putting together the list of articles for Wikipedia 0.5, the test release for Wikipedia 1.0.  I have so far set up a rough draft nominations page (the review process needs fixing there). Can you let me know which FAs should not be included, on the grounds of POV disputes, etc? Thanks, Walkerma 07:46, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  FAs for Wikipedia 0.5 

message: I was just reviewing the page, and noticed that the  template keeps appearing lots of times, with virtually no readable information.  I assume this is a change to a template that no one noticed here.  Could someone fix it?  Thanks, Walkerma 04:24, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Main project page looks very odd
Talk:Cannon Street station

message: A chap I knew said Cannon Street Station will have more CCTV cameras than some towns.
On looking - if they are small towns - he might be right.  Certainly each entry or exit appears to have a dozen or more, with many others scattered across the public spaces.  Are the staff subjected to such intrusive monitoring?
Worth including in the main article - or just a facet of life in London, UK, after the Blair/Brown government?
Autochthony queried.  20110303_2205z.81.132.188.132 (talk) 22:04, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: CCTV Cameras

message: The text talks about there originally being eight platforms and subsequently talks about the number of platforms being reduced from nine to eight. However it's not explained when the number of platforms was increased from eight to nine. I think that the history described at https://www.kentrail.org.uk/London%20Cannon%20Street%202.htm is accurate but I don't disagree with user Mattdaviesfsic that this source may fail WP:SPS. Can anybody provide an alternate reference to the number of platforms being increased from eight to nine? Thanks, Zin92 (talk) 05:30, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of platorms
Talk:Bruny Island (Tasmania)

message: there are too many location links here! Bruny Island is a tiny, tiny, tiny place in the world, and yet you expect a separate page on Fluted Cape, Simpsons Bay, etc etc? Why not make a page for the fish and chips shop and for each shack at Adventure Bay?
--User:tilgrieog
:It is a long-established Wikipedia consensus that all towns, no matter how small (including ghost towns with zero population), should have their own article. --Gene_poole 05:32, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Bruny Island is located in the southwest part of Storm Bay, so the answer would appear to be no. The small island/s shown is obviously Maria Island. --Gene_poole 21:30, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, thanks. I got mixed up with the scale of that map. So they didnt show Bruny Island separate from Tasmania - perhaps it is "Boreals Eylanden"  --Astrokey44 02:41, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Locations
Talk:Dwelling in the Fuchun Mountains

message: If the two parts aren't equal in size, they aren't properly called halves. Meeve 04:13, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a very good point i overlooked. Thanks! :) --Plastictv 16:50, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Halves

message: The shorter piece is currently on loan to the National Palace Museum in Taipei where, beginning on June 1, the two pieces are on display together for the first time since the painting was torn apart some 400 years ago:
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/photo/2011-06/02/c_13907996.htm
CNJECulver (talk) 12:21, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reunited at last 

message: The article mistranslates the name of the smaller piece as "The Broken Mountain". 剩山圖 should be (and always is, as far as I've seen) translated as "The Remaining Mountain". See, for example, Culture.tw, this China Daily article, and this page from the National Palace Museum in Taipei.
CNJECulver (talk) 22:01, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Note that even the China Online Museum link in the external links section, which is largely a cut-n-paste of this article, replaces "Broken Mountains" with "Remaining Mountain". I'm going to make the change. CNJECulver (talk) 22:42, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Broken Mountain" mistranslation
Talk:The Innocence Mission

message: Isn't calling one of their songs "Mazzy Star esque" POV? Jaberwocky6669 | ☎ 04:25, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Rosstown Railway

message: The information here on the running date differs by a decade from the information at List of closed Melbourne railway stations - which is right? Josh Parris # 04:32, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: All links I can find online, including the official Glen Eira City Council pages, say 1888.  Citizen D 22:18, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It could have been a slipup on my part; feel free to change it if the other sources say '88. I've had a half-finished major expansion of this article (well, when I started it, this article didn't exist), as well as an article on its founder, in the works for quite a while. When I get back to Canberra permanently in January, I'll dig out Return to Rosstown from the National Library and check it out. Ambi 10:59, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I've been meaning to get down to the Glen Eira library to check out that same publication purely out of fascination with Ross and the Railway story.  I actually live in Caulfield South (a block away from one of the reserves where the line once ran) so if you need any present day photos or first hand observations, let me know. Citizen D 04:08, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I've already started taking notes for articles on both Ross and the Railway; I suspect with another one or two days at the library I could well be able to finish them. Photos of the reserves would be fantastic, though, if at all possible. :) Ambi 04:44, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

text: Cheers Ambi.  I think it may be over-wikified but I'm hoping others will edit it as needed in regards to style.  More to come too. Citizen D 07:18, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Decade

message: Do we really need a Line Guide for a defunct railway line, that already has a great diagram, that may or may not have evern actually run a passenger train?  I'll leave it for a few days to discuss. Citizen D (talk) 21:51, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No discussion so removing Citizen D (talk) 00:35, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Line Guide

message: While perusing the maps in the vicinity of the Rosstown railway route I noticed roads that suggest another line (or at least a siding) heading south from the western side of Carnegie Station and likely bounded by Toolambool Road and Railway Road (a certain giveaway) and reaching the eastern end of Koornang Park. Perhaps a note regrading this line/siding can be added to the article. 58.108.61.206 (talk) 08:14, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @58.108.61.206 have a look at the route map in the infobox at the top of the page. The section you are referring to is the connection from Carnegie to the Sugar Works. According to my research, this section was never built (same with the connection to the Frankston line). -- ThylacineHunter (talk) 08:45, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was there a Rosstown siding?
Talk:Jeff Fenholt

message: There has been an "Unreferenced Section" tag on the "Departure" section of the article for more than two years. Perhaps the unsourced material in this section should be deleted, if no one comes forth with reliable sources to corroborate it.
In this connection I would like to point out that there are multiple web pages about Jeff Fenholt whose content is virtually identical to this Wikipedia article. Whether this article copied those pages or vice-versa, I don't know: but it's far from clear to me that any of those pages would qualify as legitimate sources.Chillowack (talk) 03:09, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsourced passages
Talk:Maffra

message: Is it possible Maffra is losing people?  We say it had 4,149 people as at 2006, but in the infobox it’s only 3,813 as at 2009.  Yet each figure comes from the same source, the 2006 Census stats, which would not know 3 years in advance what the 2009 population was going to be.  What’s going on here?  --  JackofOz (talk) 07:01, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The 2006 figure is the only population figure provided by the source. Now fixed. Melburnian (talk) 11:27, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Population
Talk:Peace of Augsburg

message: HELP WITH HOMEWORK....
How did both the Catholics and Lutherans violate the Peace of Augsburg?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.212.225.73 (talk • contribs) 
:This is probably too late for your homework (the above comment being added October 28, 2005)...however, for future reference, if you have a question along these lines, try asking here. Cheers!--24.58.164.194 17:53, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Does this actually belong at all:
Some historians argue[citation needed] that this late unification as a nation-state led to the extreme German nationalism in the 19th and 20th centuries, and thus indirectly to World War I and World War II.
?
It's certainly true that perfectly respectable historians argue that, and you could easily dig up a citation, but it's also highly speculative and not directly related to Augsburg, which was just one in a long list of events contributing to German disunity.
69.233.38.111 05:37, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  20th century nationalism? 

message: 'The Peace of Augsburg arrangement is also credited with ending much Christian unity around Europe. Before, the main religion was Roman Catholicism with a few practicers of Lutheranism.'
These two statements have an extreme pro-Catholic tilt. They are also unsupported by citations and, quite simply, false. 
Christian unity had ended long  before the Peace of Augsburg, as the preceding series of bloody wars made utterly clear. There were also far more than 'a few' practitioners of Lutheranism at the time. 
The prose suffers from a great deal of vagueness as well and reads like a high-school essay. 'Practitioners' is also spelled wrong. A writer who can't be bothered to spell check the work has no business tinkering with entries.  
RobotBoy66 (talk) 03:34, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clear Bias, Muddy Prose
Talk:Khanda (Sikh symbol)

message: I linked the phrase "spiritual soverienty" to "dogma". It's not the best choice, but it's the only one I could think of. Is there a better wiki page about the notion that various religious groups each claim to have final truth on religious matters? 
...
I'll go have a look at the "religious intolerance" page, and see if there are some links there more suitable.
Paul Murray 02:14, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  spritual soverignty 

message: The Khanda is well known among Indian warrior communities like the Rajputs and Marathas...in fact its use really begins with the Rajputs. But the page implies that its an exclusively Sikh weapon...please obtain pictures and text about the Khanda from Rajput sources and place it here.
Thanks.
respose to the above comment
How childish!Ajjay (talk) 09:59, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Khanda among other warrior communities 

message: The reference to the Iranian flag is relevant as is the Iranian language, so in order to clarify its meaning in Persian, it has been provided with references to the Iranian language.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.192.59.130 (talk) 12:58, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Definition of the word
Talk:The Underwater Menace

message: Did they get the year wrong in the episode, or is the article incorrect?Donald Hosek 23:26, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 1970 Olympics?

message: Its just been announced at a BFI screening that Episode 2 of The Underwater Menace has been recovered - I can only see news sources at the moment and am waiting for the BFI to publish something.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.251.252.94 (talk) 17:45, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This has been confirmed on the BBC website itself. – RobinHood70 talk 18:23, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode 2 recovered 

message: BBC have confirmed a release for this title.
Source: http://www.bbcshop.com/drama/doctor-who-the-underwater-menace/invt/bbcdvd3691 46.31.201.181 (talk) 16:35, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  DVD Release 
Talk:The Moonbase

message: I believe that the date of Part Four should be the FOURTH of March, not the third - the third would be a Friday.  The BBC's website gives the date as the fourth.  So, am I missing something, or is it just a simple mistake?  Steffan Alun 21:48, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Quite right - I've corrected it. --Brian Olsen 03:13, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of Part Four
Talk:The Ice Warriors

message: Is there a clearer picture out there? Me lkjhgfdsa 18:57, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Several.--SB | T 19:02, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Added one without having to change the caption.Litefoot 07:43, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 
Talk:The Enemy of the World

message: Just note for anyone who stops by, please keep the detailed plot summaries for serials containing lost episodes.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.111.76.31 (talk) 14:17, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see Wikipedia:Manual of Style (writing about fiction)#Plot summaries. If readers need a high level of detail, there are the narrated soundtracks in the BBC Audiobooks range, the Target novelisations (several of which are now available as talking books), and quite a few reference books. --Redrose64 (talk) 14:36, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot summary

message: It has been recovered 195.169.141.54 (talk) 17:25, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The article has been pulled (probably as it is breaking the embargo) => Spudgfsh (Text Me!) 17:52, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: independent.co.uk put up an article confirming an hour ago... and just took it down. Lost in time indeed. Joegoodfriend (talk) 20:43, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

text: ) Joegoodfriend (talk) 23:40, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: No longer missing

message: In addition to using split-screen, Patrick Troughton was doubled as both The Doctor and Salamander by the story’s stunt-man and fight arranger, Peter Diamond, to allow the two characters to fight while showing Troughton’s face (the scene was presumably shot twice, with a costume swap in the middle, and both versions intercut). Probably needs a citation, but could be added to the article. Jock123 (talk) 18:47, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Patrick Troughton Doubled… 

message: The article currently states that the change from 405- to 625-line recording happened in episode 3. While reading the latest DWM (#466), it states there that the recording found for episode 1 was a 625-line recording. I therefore think a change should be done. -101090ABC (talk) 10:14, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The BBC possessed standards-conversion equipment at this time, so that programmes made for BBC1 could be repeated on BBC2 (which was never 405-line). This might be a standards-converted copy. --Redrose64 (talk) 10:46, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change to 625-line standard 

message: The article is dated Friday August 16 2017, and is presented as an article from "last year" so it seems the episode takes place in 2018. Note that August 16 2017 will indeed be a Wednesday and not a Friday. 90.47.216.96 (talk) 12:56, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Newspaper article 

message: I've protected the page for seven days because of this dispute. Discuss the matter please, don't edit war. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 15:50, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected seven days
Talk:The Web of Fear

message: Hey, I found this article using Random Article and I cut down the humongous plot summary. I also removed the synopsis, here it is if anyone objects:
Some forty years after their first encounter, the Second Doctor, Jamie and Victoria discover that Yeti have invaded the London Underground. Help is at hand from an old friend - and a man who will become one.
Sorry if I messed up the summary, I tried to make it as short as possible by focusing on the Doctor, Jamie, and Victoria and removing all of the side stories and lengthy summary descriptions. I also put some of the backstory at the beginning of the plot summary part, instead of after the second paragraph. Intothewoods29 (talk) 21:56, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't worry about it.  There's a movement to prune the plot summaries -- it's just taking a while to get to each and every article. DonQuixote (talk) 03:05, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot Summary 

message: On October 10, 2013, the BBC announced that the missing episodes had been found in Nigeria. The footage has been remastered and will be made available via iTunes and DVD. Phillip Morris, director of Television International Enterprises Archive,  made the discovery by looking up the records of overseas shipments of tapes made by the BBC.
Prof Bernard Quatermass (talk) 17:01, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request on 10 October 2013 

message: This is not a blog or a fan page Hektor (talk) 17:33, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It was but the article has been pulled (probably as it is breaking the embargo) => Spudgfsh (Text Me!) 17:52, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Image of the pulled article for those that are curious.  128.210.146.208 (talk) 18:10, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: I call that a reliable source

message: Episodes 2,4,5,6 have been found of this serial, please ratify the fact that only one episode is now missing of this serial.http://www.doctorwhotv.co.uk/lost-doctor-who-classics-found-53619.htm  
Anthony "The Tweed" Carroll (talk) 18:41, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request on 10 October 2013 

message: https://itunes.apple.com/gb/tv-season/doctor-who-the-web-of-fear/id704945256
It says all the eps are on there. Even ep 3 which this page says is missing.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.136.192.38 (talk) 23:48, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a reconstruction using the soundtrack and Telesnaps. Nick Cooper (talk) 08:50, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Should this page comment on how well the story is doing in the UK, US, Canadian and Australian Itunes charts? It would be an interesting feature.Wiggs (talk) 10:38, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Personally I would say not; to focus on the iTunes performance of this story seems like WP:Recentism. It would be fairer for all of the story articles to include chart performance for all formats - VHS, DVD and downloads; but a big move like that should really be proposed at WT:WHO. Other things to consider include the reliability of various sources - see WP:CHARTS. --Redrose64 (talk) 13:37, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  itunes
Category talk:Nuclear test sites

message: Didn't the French test an atom bomb in the Sahara desert somewhere?
*In Algeria, yes, but unless we have a specific artilce about this test site I don't think it belongs in this category. Putting the entire country of Algeria in seems fairly misleading. --Fastfission 17:52, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: talk page items

message: The Allincluded tag was added to this category in 2009 without an explanation of why this category should not follow normal categorization practice.  Now that there is a list article I see even less reason for such a tag and propose to remove it. Comments? DexDor (talk) 19:50, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Allincluded
Talk:Top Gear (radio programme)

message: See Radio Rewind for a 1964-5 listing including Top Gear - and the name preceded the use of gear to descibe drugs or drug paraphernalia - Peeping Tom 24.6.07
This is not correct; the Beatles were on Top Gear numerous times in the early sixties.
: Top Gear didn't start until 1967, certainly not the 'early sixties'. --duncan 06:41, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

message: I can't imagine why the article needs to be expanded, or what more there is to be said about the show.KD Tries Again (talk) 19:21, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub?

message: Much about the programme in this (interesting!) BBC item on famous artists' first auditions for Auntie. Onanoff (talk) 00:27, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  BBC auditions
Talk:Non-suit

message: Demurrer... the problem with this merger is that non-suit is the legal term used in Canada and in British common law (and in other Commonwealth countries).  Demurrer is not used at all (at least in Canada).  I will instead make reference to this in the article... if that satisfies please remove the merger suggestion. Dyslexic agnostic 06:27, 28 October 2005 (UTC)

message: I included the concepts of demurrer as well as those of summary judgment.  The larger issue highlighted here is that general entries of legal terms and concepts are being made, but the fact is that there are large differences in law between countries, and within "common law" countries like Canada, the US, Great Britain, Australia, etc.  In some cases those differences need to by highlighted within the same article; in others, it may be appropriate to separate them into two or more articles. Dyslexic agnostic 20:36, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Adelaide Hills

message: * How do you add a town to the template: ? I'd like to add Clarendon and Mylor but can't find the template origin. ROxBo 21:33, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's located at Template:Adelaide Hills. If ever you come across a template with no edit link, edit the article on which it is transcluded and beneath the edit box you'll find a list of templates used in the article.--cj | talk 01:25, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of television shows set in Washington, D.C.

message: Editors may be interested in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of television shows set in Connecticut. Kappa 07:03, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: could somebody please read a article about it? i love the show, and after it will be written i would like to translate it to dutch. the show just started over here! FANSTAR 16:06, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Mister Sterling

message: Should news shows, especially locally based ones, be included in this list? Or was this intended to be a list of fictional shows set in DC?
✮ Fredo (talk) 05:25, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: News Shows

message: An editor has twice added "The Americans (Set in Falls Church, Virginia just east of DC."  Aside from being unsourced, Falls Church isn't in DC.  Magnolia677 (talk) 23:28, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced content unrelated to this article