lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Axiom schema of specification

message: Concerning "unrestricted comprehension", PlanetMath's "comprehension axiom" says: 
:In theories which make no distinction between objects and sets (such as ZF), this formulation leads to Russel's paradox, however in stratified theories this is not a problem (for example second order arithmetic includes the axiom of comprehension).
This sounds correct to me (for a stratified theory, I'm thinking primarily of Russell and Whitehead's theory of types), but our article does not include this qualification, saying instead:
:This axiom schema was tacitly used in the early days of naive set theory, before a strict axiomatisation was adopted. Unfortunately, it leads directly to Russell's paradox by taking P(C) to be (C is not in C). Therefore, no useful axiomatisation of set theory can use unrestricted comprehension, at least not with classical logic.
Can someone more knowledgeable than me reconcile the above, and edit the article appropriately. Paul August ☎ 21:20, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, you weren't talking about NF. Hmm. Well, second-order arithmetic isn't a (general) set theory, exactly. I'm really not all that familiar with the system of Principia. --Trovatore 21:30, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Unrestricted comprehension and paradoxes
Talk:Bidwell Park

message: There's way too much unencyclopedic trivia in the timeline.  Gene Nygaard 21:35, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Keetoowah/Evidence

message: The evidence on this page warms my heart. Editors who care so deeply about keeping article content that they err only in their edit commnents. Nothing inappropriate in the text! Don't get me wrong, I think Keetoowah should be admonished for his remarks, but certainly not punished in any way. He was preserving article content, first and foremost!
Sam Spade 21:47, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Warms my heart

message: This user continually pushes his own pov on articles, sometimes with specious arguments, othertimes with overly long comments, other times he goes for direct insults and so on. I'm not sure just how the arbitration process works, so I'm posting thoughts here for discussion and will study up on arbitration. Arbitrators would please see Keetoowah's editing at Ward Churchill (many archives of discussion should be skimmed over); also observe his editing behaviour at Air America Radio. Summary-- Keetoowah does not seem at all interested in being part of the Wikipedia community, but rather he seems to view the project as an adversarily process in which he stuggles to win at, seemingly, at any cost. Calicocat 03:37, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Keetoowah just can't get along with others
Talk:The Adventures of Shirley Holmes

message: (cross-posted to Television WikiProject)
I'd like to see this article become featured, but unfortunately I lack the time nor the skills to write a stunning article. However, the linked fan site has a few bits of behind-the-scenes info and repeated guest star Leslie Wolos and main star Meredith Henderson may be available for questions through their personal websites. I would like to invite anyone with a passion for Canadian children's television to get this article in a top-notch state. If it ends up featured, I'll award the people who made major contributions to the article with a personal award. - Mgm|(talk) 21:49, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I know both the creators of this show and would gladly help this article in any way I can. Please inform me what information is needed and so forth to allow this article to flourish and become featured. --Glitchd (talk) 15:18, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Request to get this to featured status

message: The article bills Molly Hardy as a sociopath. Does it have any evidence to support this? I personally have never watched the program so I'd prefer someone with more experience to rectify this inaccuracy.
Anon
*It's not an inaccuracy. Several characters refer to her as a sociopath within the show. - Mgm|(talk) 09:24, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Molly Hardy

message: Just found an old Fox Family Worldwide affiliates meeting I recorded off C-band in 98. Seems they were touting this show, under the name of "The Shirley & Bo Detective Agency", as being part of their Saturday mornings on the relaunched Fox Family Channel. Never happened, of course, but interesting to note.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.74.224.249 (talk) 06:19, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Fox Family Channel

message: I have added an Episode List to this page. Maymichael2 (talk) 23:27, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Edits
Talk:Third Dáil

message: I have removed the reference to the implicit recognition of the Third Dáil status for the following reasons:
* The presence, absence or numbering of Hansard style records is unrelated to official thinking on the legitimacy of the body itself - the UK Parliament had no official record for most of its existence.
* The official website of Dáil Éireann does not exactly duplicate the organisation of the printed Official Report in its tables of content.
* The numbering of the Official Report has more to do with the technical production of printed and bound volumes than official thinking as to the status of the Dáil.
To take the last point first, historically Volumes have not covered a fixed period of time, or a fixed volume of business. Instead the decision to start a new volume and print a bound version of the completed volume seems to have been rather arbitrary until recent times. As a result some Volumes were printed in A and B sections to keep within manageable size, while other volumes are relatively slim.
In addition account must be taken of the Gazettes. Firstly, the Official Gazette of the First Dáil, in which (according to the Official Report itself) the Official Report of the public sessions were to be published and made available for sale.
Also Iris Oifigiúil which replaced the Dublin Gazette on 31st January, 1922, during the Second Dáil, as a result of the Adaption of Enactments Act, 1922 (I don't know whether this contained the Official Report of the Second Dáil, but it seems a likely candidate).
Bound volumes of the Official Report for the first two Dála were not produced until much later, after the practice of producing bound volumes of the Official Report was well established. A volume was produced for the First Dáil, one for the Treaty Debate, one for the public sessions of the Second Dáil (both before and after but not including the Treaty Debate) and one for the private sessions of the Second Dáil. If I remember correctly, of these volumes, the Treaty Debate volume was actually produced first, with the other volumes produced some time later.
A further complication is that private sessions of the First and Second Dála, prior to the Treaty Debate, are not in Hansard form but rather in Minute form.
And that brings me to my second bulleted point. The official website aims to provide a date ordered table of contents. To do this for the Second Dáil in particular its combines multiple bound volumes into logical volumes. Speaking as one involved in this decision, it was decided that the timeline of the debates as they switched between public and private sessions was more important that the physical bound volume in which the session had been published.
Attempting to infer "implicit recognition" of anything from this would be a mistake, and particularly so when compared to the status of Acts of the First and Second Dáil in Saorstát Éireann.
--------------------------
Féar Éireann: I've replied to our respective changes on my talk page.Andrew L 01:35, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:1918 United States Senate elections

message: While the text of the article says, "The Republican Party gained control with a slim 2-seat majority after picking up a net six seats", the box at the right indicates a tie 48 to 48 Democrats vs GOP. (PeacePeace (talk) 16:26, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Good. But still some explanation is needed. Why is there still the 48 to 48 tie indicated in the box? Were the special elections part of the 1918 election? (PeacePeace (talk) 16:36, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  There, I've made some changes.  Instead of my explaining it to you here (where it's less useful), can you figure it out now from the article? —GoldRingChip 19:58, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Obtuse Article
Talk:Monads

message: This is written from very, very, very limited exposure to Monads whilst involved with Pugs. Much rewrite/cleanup would be good!
----
From the article:
*A function ("bind") is required that takes:
**A monad containing type A
**A function that converts from a type A, to a monad of type B and returns a monad of type B.
This looks like a special case of faulty parallels ("returns a monad of type B" would seem to pertain to "A function that converts..." --22:50, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
Template talk:Featuredpicturetools

message: BrokenSegue removed the links to the Commons at the bottom of this template. I restored them. My rationale is:
* Both Commons and English Wikipedia are Wikimedia projects. We promote these projects constantly through sister project templates. Since a sister project template is not appropriate on the pages where this template is used, these navigational links make sense.
* The Wikimedia Commons is particularly important to promote, as we want to encourage uploading and nominating free content on the Commons. The Commons is also frequently cited in FPC discussions, so it's good to have handy links clearly visible at the top of the page.
* English is the main language used in FPC discussions on the Commons. That means there's a natural interest of people working on the English Wikipedia to also look at the featured pictures on Commons. These links are convenient for people for whom Commons is part of their "wikiflow".
--Eloquence* 22:19, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: this last compromise is fine. Broken S 01:55, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Small Business Server

message: This article should describe small business servers in general, not a redirect to Microsoft Small Business Server.
Yuhong 22:19, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Small Business Server 

message: However the information at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NetWare#NetWare_4.1x_and_NetWare_for_Small_Business:_Novell_begins_to_recover AND Windows Small Business Server are not very accurate either. The install disks for the products say Novell Small Business Server versions 4.1, 4.11, 5.0, and 5.1 which became Small Business Suite 6.0 and 6.5. Although Microsoft BackOffice Server predates Novell Small Business Server, the bundle discount pricing of the Microsoft Small Business BackOffice Server offering is modeled on the Novell package.
Shjacks45 (talk) 02:36, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Novell Small Business Server should not be redirected to Microsoft Small Business Server
Talk:Harold MacGrath

message: I listed his books made into films like this:
*The Place of Honeymoons (1912) - (1920 film)  
It doesn't look the best so if someone can come up with a better presentation, that would be appreciated. - 22:22, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've done considerable editing, based on what is here, but the article needs inline citations to support its assertions. I don't have the time to try to work at that.Parkwells (talk) 03:25, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Edited
Talk:Soft count

message: I tried to fix up the grammar and make the sentences more clear. Is copyedit still needed? The pi pirate 03:17, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think so.  I made a couple of very pedantic changes and deleted the tag. Kcordina 15:23, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening comments 

message: I believe that this is simply a dic def.  Soft count is the process of collecting and counting paper currency.  This is the opposite of hard which involves coins and metal tokens.  So unless there is something I'm missing I'll likely tag this for AfD.  I would do a transwiki but I don't believe the current content is correct or worth keeping.  Vegaswikian 07:08, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importance and accuracy
Talk:Marvels

message: Sheldon manages to climb to the top a skyscraper and photograph the wave pushing its way over the Brooklyn Bridge and much of New York (in some of the most amazing artwork ever seen in comic books).
have to question the Neutral Point of View of that last part...12.47.223.8 22:28, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It's true though. The art is amazing, and nothing that you'd expect to see in a comic. Satan's Rubber Duck 12:44, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Seeing as the story "Ruins" is somewhat related to Marvels, shouldn't it be expanded on, or even given it's own entry?
Sera404 21:50, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marvel Ruins 

message: I recall reading in Wizard a few months (even possilbly a year or two ago), an article on Marvels 2.  Whatever happen that it wasn't published?  A possible sequel might be nice to add to the article. 66.109.248.114 20:08, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It has been published about a year ago, I think it was called Marvels: Eyes of the Camera.  I'm surprised that Marvel fans hasn't start building an article after the first issue of the mini-series.--NeoBatfreak (talk) 22:15, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Marvels 2

message: Everything in this article is a spoiler...and i don't know anything about spoiler tags.
--66.215.17.13 04:22, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Spoiler tags?

message: I've heard that many of the events witnessed are direct references to things that happened in the original comics (I actually clicked over to learn more about them and didn't see anything). If this is true, it would be a very valuable resource to add to this page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.139.144.66 (talk) 20:11, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: References to original works

message: Requesting a new article for the sequel Marvels: Eye of the Camera --NeoBatfreak (talk) 04:23, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marvels: Eye of the Camera
Talk:Golden rule (law)

message: "In Rex v. Sigsworth (1935; Ch 89) the court decided that a son who had murdered his mother could not inherit her estate under s.46 of the Administration of Estates Act (1925), even though there was only one literal interpretation of the word "issue" used in s.46."
im not seeing how the meaning of the word 'issue' was relevent to the case -- can someone who knows about it explain, please? --Dak 07:40, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  use 

message: Wikipedia Precedent describes Adler v George as a Narrow Method application of Golden Rule. Yet here it is presented as "The leading case on the wider approach"! Naytz (talk) 03:08, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Well spotted. I have corrected the text in Precedent.  --MichaelMaggs (talk) 16:17, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adler v George / Narrow v Wide  

message: The court cases that were used to support the article were dated back to the 1800's. In this case, improvement of this article would possibly be to include contemporary court cases that utilize the Golden Rule.https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Golden_rule_(law)&action=edit§ion=new  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andersonbriana4 (talk • contribs) 21:52, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Evaluation 

message: Of what importance is golden rule 141.95.52.237 (talk) 20:23, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It allowed the court to arrive at common-sense judgments in the cases mentioned, and others. MichaelMaggs (talk) 21:10, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Of what importance is golden rule
Talk:Lowrider bicycle

message: Why dies this wiki not mention the true history of lowrider bikes which were started by Mexican American kids?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.82.217.84 (talk) 02:54, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

message: I'll be the first to admit I know nothing at all about low rider bicycles.  I've tried to clean this up, but I'd like someone who knows the topic to check if it's still accurate.  Also, is the proper form "low rider" or "lowrider"?
--Alynna 22:49, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: on google did anything come up? --Maoririder 14:46, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Both terms appear, although if I google "low rider bicycle" I also get google asking me if i meant "lowrider bicycle".  I've been unable to find a definition, though -- just ads and people describing in great detail how they decorated their bikes. --Alynna 15:25, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  expert attention needed 

message: any fan of the b-boys (that has little other association w/ the term) thinks of professor Booty when they hear this phrase. that's what it is. skizznologic3.3 05:28, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[check Your Head]] 

message: Why is there no mention of the history of lowrider bikes? Started by Mexican American youth to emulate the lowrider cars seen in their neighborhoods. Sadly, we are never given credit for anything. Including this. Lowrider culture is Mexican American culture. Period. 76.82.217.84 (talk) 02:57, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  No mention of the history
Talk:Francis A. Nixon

message: Has a source been able to provide a location for that gas station?  It would be interesting if one was still there, and doubly so if it was an AM/PM. knoodelhed (talk) 00:11, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Francis' gas station in Whittier
Talk:Motormark

message: This article seems full of rumours and is quite badly written. Needs a rewrite! --81.242.213.114 10:21, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: According to their Yahoo group the band has split, but it looks like they're now part of a band called Fake Fang?  Someone might want to have a look! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.112.33.241 (talk) 19:49, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Band Breaks Up 

message: I'll accept my edit summary was overly brief and unclear: my intention was to say that the subject apparently fails WP:BAND, only noting additionally that there are currently no sources and I couldn't find any indicating anything more than their existence - but that wasn't clear from my summary. I may not be employing the correct search terms to find anything more significant but, searching again, nothing I can find notes anything more than their existence and nothing remotely approaches WP:BAND. If I've missed material genuinely indicating notability, do please add it but unless and until I think the article is appropriate for AFD. Mutt Lunker (talk) 10:29, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Three years on - I've looked at the deletion discussion, which was closed as keep, and the sources identified then. I tend to agree that notability isn't established. Tacyarg (talk) 17:20, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:List of Michigan county name etymologies

message: We could use maps which show the evolution of the county names and lines over time.  I think the piece would be improved by that.
7&6=thirteen (talk) 01:32, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Maps needed

message: Dear BKonrad:
Interestingly, even as you were deleting my informaiton about the Kent in Kent County, Michigan as "extraneous", I was having another gentleman delete an internal link to List of Michigan county name etymologies as 'irrelevant' to the entry on the Toledo War.
With respect, one can fairly deduce the hows and whys of the Michigan county name changes.  This ties in perfectly with the cabinet counties, and shows the undying gratitude of a grateful state.
You are just as wrong on this one as is the gentleman on the Toledo War.
I understand relevancy.  It is my job.  But this relates to the major thesis of the article.
One has to think about the total picture, and presenting it in accord with accuracy and recorded history.  I did that here.
Think about it.  I know you can do right on this disagreement.
Best to you.
7&6=thirteen (talk) 23:55, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Extraneous information on the lawyer Kent of [[Kent County]]

message: I put in the following in the article:
The differences in meaning would appear to be (at least in part) due to the difference between a literal translation and a more contextual interpretation. Place names that are devoid of (remembered) history, context, persons or place are subject to infinite debate, since by definition all of the participants are dead, and actual documents showing their intent are rare or no longer existent.
My question is whether "persons" or "place" should each be singular or plural?  Which would better convey the thought?
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks.
7&6=thirteen (talk) 00:11, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: A question of grammar and syntax

message: You merged this.  You didn't bother to notify contributing editors of the proposal.  I was a major contributor.  Viewed most charitably, this was an oversight.  Viewed more crudely, this was rude and a breach of etiquette.  Either way, I dissent.  It is now a matter of record, as is your protocol.  I trust this won't happen in the future.  WP:AGF.  Happy editing.  7&6=thirteen (talk) 03:43, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  When you were merging/deleting this article, proper etiquette would have been to notify contributing editors.
Talk:Charoset

message: I can see that the forty ingredients - forty years recipe/story has already been tagged "dubious", and I'd like to add my own puzzled question: what was the 40th ingredient before bananas were introduced?? Emika22 (talk) 17:34, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  40 ingredients, bananas 

message: Purim is 30 days BEFORE passover, so leftovers for humnasheen 11 months later isn't logical nor in my experience something that exists.Aviwollman (talk) 09:11, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leftovers 

message: While not in Song of Songs, grated ginger is specifically mentioned to be added. to enhance the resemblance to mortar made with straw. https://cdn.fedweb.org/fed-90/2/5778%2520%25202018%2520%2520%2520PASSOVER%2520%2520Haroset%2520%2520workshop%2520%2520%2520%2520new%2520%2520%2520%2520%2520%2520%2520%2520%2520%2520%2520%2520%2520%2520%2520%2520%2520%2520%2520%2520%2520%25203.pdf 
https://aish.com/48960481/
Ginger is one of the more common ingredients, globally. (Present in nearly every major tradition mentioned, and amazingly, currently absent from the page entire.)
Drsruli (talk) 22:23, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ginger
Talk:What We Did on Our Holidays

message: I own the US version of this album (SP-4185 released by A&M). It has the title "Fairport Convention," and a cover picture of the band sitting on a pile of leaves. But it seems to have the same tracks.
Chris Loosley 04:24, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Differences between British and US releases 

message: One of the citations in the article says that the album includes covers of obscure folk-rock artists, but the only two cover tracks are of Bob Dylan and Joni Mitchell--hardly obscure.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.161.240.138 (talk) 05:27, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment on article 

message: St. Peter's Church, Westbourne Grove? The only church on Westbourne Grove is the Baptist Church? So presumably this was St Peter's, Notting Hill, even though it's actually on Kensington Park Road? Martinevans123 (talk) 23:35, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:   "The Lord Is in This Place..."
Talk:Hoshiarpur district

message: Why's it called Hoshiarpur if it's spelled Hushiarpur in Panjabi? Also, it seems to actually be spelt Hushiarpur in Hindi?? I believe the same word in Persian is also spelt with a u. Anyone know?? Nlsanand (talk) 06:39, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  spelling 