Talk:Children's Discovery Museum of San Jose

message: This section really needs to be cleaned up.  Almost the entire paragraph is POV and needs to be toned down and/or rewritten.  For example:
*"This is EXACTLY what Legorreta had in mind" 
*"This building (and the nearby Tech Museum by Legorreta) give the City of San Jose two world-class structures of significant architectural importance." 
*"...diverting from the architects' intentions." 
*""The City of San Jose allowed the remodel contractor to "deface & vandalize" a master work of architecture. " 
*"it was built by the low bidder, who "value engineered" the water feature to the point of failure."
*"The building was later remodeled (2006-2007) by another low bidder, so it is destined for some future failures of some type." --SharkxFanSJ (talk) 18:41, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV issues with the "Architecture" section 

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests December 2011 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 01:19, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Children's Discovery Museum.jpeg Nominated for Deletion

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 04:15, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]] 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Children's Discovery Museum of San Jose. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121230060711/http://www.cdm.org:80/unboxed to http://www.cdm.org/unboxed
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081108034140/http://www.getchy.com/ to http://www.getchy.com
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:22, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified