lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ancient Egypt

message: See Talk:Ancient Egypt#WP:URFA/2020. The article hasn't received sustained attention for a long time, and I fear our flagship article will lose its FA status without a concerted effort. Anyone who would like to help, please comment on the talk page. A. Parrot (talk) 00:50, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  FA status of [[Ancient Egypt]] under review 

message: I'd like to ask the experienced editors here to weigh-in with their opinions on the questions: ? I don't have strong opinions for or against it and the Roman period isn't one I have any useful familiarity with. Mr rnddude (talk) 19:12, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The discussion isn't centralized and is spread across several talk pages, though I think LindsayH's thread opening at Template talk:Pharaohs is probably the best place to discuss this as it's more centralized, if in the back-end. Mr rnddude (talk) 20:19, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  A request raised at [[Talk:Elagabalus]] and [[Talk:Caracalla]] 

message: Brought up at FTN where they are asking for an Egyptologist to comment. It's fringe, maybe too much self-sourced. Also, I can't find citations 7 and 8 to verify them or see if they mention Rohl.  Thanks. Doug Weller talk 11:37, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Shock horror! Rohl added those citations. In fact, Rohl wrote 22:5% of the page.Eg . Including, for example, "Thus, Rohl is of the opinion that none of these three foundations of the conventional Egyptian chronology are secure, and that the sacking of Thebes by the Assyrian king Ashurbanipal in 664 BC is the earliest fixed date in Egyptian history." WP:Who Wrote That is amazingly useful. Doug Weller talk 13:02, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[New Chronology (Rohl)]] 

message: An editor has suggested creating an article for the fragmentary king list from Ramesses II's temple at Abydos, not to be confused with the Abydos King List inscribed in Ramesses' father's temple. Please discuss in the talk page section linked above. A. Parrot (talk) 15:43, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Talk:Abydos, Egypt#Split proposed]] 

message: There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Egyptian Grammar: Being an Introduction to the Study of Hieroglyphs#Requested move 1 March 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. RodRabelo7 (talk) 18:37, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move at [[Talk:Egyptian Grammar: Being an Introduction to the Study of Hieroglyphs#Requested move 1 March 2024]] 

message: Hello,Please note that Ancient Egyptian architecture, which is within this project's scope, has been selected as one of the Articles for improvement. The article is scheduled to appear on Wikipedia's Community portal in the "Articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing! 
Delivered by — MusikBot talk 00:05, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!
Talk:Phonograph record/Archive 2

message: ====analogue disc record====
# Okay by me. -- Infrogmation 15:21, 5 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text:  To me, it seems slightly different from vinyl record, where vinyl is being used as an adjective (which would be imprecise, of course); in record (vinyl) the (vinyl) is acting more as a "disambiguator" to clarify the meaning, so it's not necessarily saying the article is exclusively about vinyl records. — Matt 15:39, 5 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Voting (vote for as many as you wish)

message: # Okay by me. -- Infrogmation 15:21, 5 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: analogue disc record

message: # I vote for this one.Graham 10:45, 1 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: gramophone record

message: # David Gerard 13:05, 1 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: phonograph record

message: #David Gerard 15:02, 1 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: record (audio)

message: #ALoan (Talk) 11:43, 5 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text:  To me, it seems slightly different from vinyl record, where vinyl is being used as an adjective (which would be imprecise, of course); in record (vinyl) the (vinyl) is acting more as a "disambiguator" to clarify the meaning, so it's not necessarily saying the article is exclusively about vinyl records. — Matt 15:39, 5 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: record (vinyl)

message: # Much historic use; unless people think this would be too confused with other types of discs, I think this would be good. -- Infrogmation 15:21, 5 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: disc record

message: #David Gerard 14:39, 1 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: other (see Brainstorming above)

message: ====gramophone record====
# If the article is to be moved, then here. (Have you thought about the hundreds of redirects and double redirects?) <KF> 12:02, 1 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Voting

message: # If the article is to be moved, then here. (Have you thought about the hundreds of redirects and double redirects?) <KF> 12:02, 1 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: gramophone record

message: # —Kate | Talk 14:55, 2004 Aug 1 (UTC)
#Or this one. Graham 23:12, 1 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: record (audio)
Talk:Gim Jeong-ho

message: I deleted the quote as it was without citation. Did Kim Jeongho say this? Straitgate 09:01, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:LP5

message: * Support. Preemptive disambiguation solves nothing by definition. If and when other uses of LP5 are identified, any issues of ambiguity should be resolved then.  --Serge 07:59, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: This article linked the BOAC of "Under BOAC" to the British Overseas Airways Corporation, and that article included the sentence: '"The seventh track on the album LP5 by electronic music duo Autechre is called "Under BOAC".' While it's true that BOAC does stand for British Overseas Airways Corporation, I think that, given the commonness of non-dictionary words in Autechre's titles, it is at best uncertain that this is what they had in mind when naming the track, so I've removed that link and sentence. Obviously it can go back if we've got a decent reason to believe that there's a real connection.  --Camembert (talk) 02:14, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  British Overseas Airways Corporation 
Talk:Incunabula (album)

message: Do not change the producer credit to Autechre, the albums credits Booth and Brown uniquely in its liner notes. That is the best source to use and we should follow WP:STICKTOSOURCE. Andrzejbanas (talk) 12:31, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Producer credit
Talk:Tri Repetae

message: The title is really more like Pseudo Latin than actually Latin; but I'm not comfortable enough with the subject to modify the article to reflect this. Peyna 04:11, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the sentence ""Tri Repetae" would look like it means "Three Repeats" in Latin, but like much of the latinate words Autechre uses, it is possibly intentionally misconstrued." because all it really seems to be saying is "I think it looks like three repeats" and the last part of the sentence is unfixably bad. Recury 15:42, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Latin
Talk:EP7

message: In general article titles are not to be preemptively disambiguated, and there is only on EP7 in Wikipedia (and in AMG for that matter). Unless someone is entering another EP7 at this moment, EP7 (Autechre ep) should be renamed back to just EP7. – edgarde 16:00, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Also noteworthy, this album is named EP7, but it is an album-length compilation of two EPs. What constitutes an EP is a grey area, but at over 70 minutes, this is at best only nominally an EP. Anyway, this band are known to favor ambiguous titles, so the naming may not even signify the band's own intent to categorize. – edgarde 17:33, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

text: The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was Move.  I'm confused why EP7 (disambiguation) was moved to EP7 just a few hours ago but I'm moving it back.  —Wknight94 (talk) 02:51, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  preemptive disambig 
Talk:Kappa Pi Kappa

message: Kappa Kappa Kappa was proposed for deletion. This page has an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was consensus not reached, merged and redirected to clear off vfd
Kappa Kappa Kappa cap a kipper in a copper cap. (non-notable Darmouth silly Greek letter society) Dunc_Harris|☺ 18:33, 24 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Early deletion discussion

message: * In "the brotherhood of Tri-Kap has remading a vote on the organization's leadership", what does "remading" mean? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:26, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  A query 

message: I edit and maintain a number of WP fraternity articles.  The May 2022 name change was noted in body text, as having been achieved after a period of "consensus building".  But that simple summary cannot fully communicate the considerable skill that went into this decision and resultant unanimity.  Bravo.  Name changes for any fraternal group are difficult.  This historic chapter pre-dates the Klan by 25 years as one of the oldest local chapters still existent. The very weight of history was an enormous counter-balance to the pressure to change, even considering today's acute social consciousness or fear of any taint of racism, (clearly unmerited here).  Yes, there grew a chorus of societal goading that doubtless was a big factor, still, for any organization there would normally be hold-outs, complaining that it was unfair to be forced to change...  But Kappa Kappa Kappa got the job done.  Hat's off. It was the right decision.  Jax MN (talk) 17:50, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consensus building
Talk:New York University

message: Second paragraph in the lead, first sentence should be “NYU’s main campus” not “NYU main campus” 2600:1001:B038:F900:EDCA:6BF1:F47F:6E99 (talk) 20:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks - good catch! ElKevbo (talk) 22:19, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 22 February 2024 

message: Academics > Schools and leadership incorrectly claims Andrew Hamilton as the current president of NYU:
"On March 18, 2015, Andrew D. Hamilton became the 16th and current President of NYU."
Linda G. Mills is the current president beginning July 1, 2023: https://www.nyu.edu/about/leadership-university-administration.html 216.165.95.155 (talk) 17:18, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 28 February 2024 

message: At the end of the second lead paragraph, after “admissions are considered selective.” add the sentence “The latest admissions cycle saw only 8% of offers of admissions made to 118,000 total applicants.” With a reference to this website (citation to be fixed accordingly). This is to give the reader a sense of the popularity of the school and how selective it really is. 2600:1001:B142:332B:4C6F:FF1:31E0:E2F2 (talk) 13:42, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: The information you have requested to be added is already stated in . If you think it would be helpful to add it to the lead as well, you would first need to achieve consensus before re-opening a request, as per edit request policy. Irltoad (talk) 17:56, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 18 April 2024
Talk:Edward VI

message: Much of this article seems to be about what happened to other people during Edward's reign. Many paragraphs do not mention Edward at all. I do not know what to do about it, but it does seem wrong to treat this article, which is supposed to be a biography, as an article about the general history of England from 1547 to 1553. We already have an article about the Tudor period. Surtsicna (talk) 18:19, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: "Prince" Edward established an educational system where corporeal punishment was forbidden. It should be such to this day, as Prince Edward traversed the London city in a Surrey with a box on the back that said something such as: "For the Prince's Projects," endeavors. For those that desire to be educated? Edward came to know that education was better than what the Commoner desired of their Children. 74.82.228.84 (talk) 21:30, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

text: Edward found that he had a suspected twin bother and may have been infected from a disease by his bother's dad. One would not suspect that the disease would come upon so quickly, though. None the less, his Brother and what Edward came to know of the lives of the Commoner. There was proof what the Lord was and it was found out that the Lord was not The Lord. 74.82.228.84 (talk) 21:13, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: An identical twins, they were, excepting the proof. 74.82.228.84 (talk) 21:18, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Edward was abused as a Commoner, but not as a Lord? God ForGive. 74.82.228.84 (talk) 21:34, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: God  ForGive even if was Known as a Lord? 74.82.228.84 (talk) 21:37, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not about Edward? 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Consensus to move as proposed, strong preference to follow WP:CRITERIA rather than the old guideline style.  (non-admin closure)  В²C ☎ 06:26, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Edward VI of England →  – Edward is well known as Edward VI. The latter title is more concise. Векочел (talk) 02:36, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Edward VIII of the United Kingdom & Edward V of England, would suffice. GoodDay (talk) 01:43, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 12 July 2021
Talk:AWOL

message: I think this is used in the British (and hence Commonwealth) military too. Dunc_Harris|☺ 18:41, 24 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It's also what you call AOL when it's gone AWOL and wont connect! 68.39.174.150 05:24, 9 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  AOL 

message: (I moved the following comment by 207.200.116.11 off the main page --Deathphoenix 17:54, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: FWIW, I looked in military.com and didn't find this term. --Deathphoenix 17:56, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  APWL 

message: I've looked through the list of articles that link to this page, and the majority of them intend the military meaning at Desertion (in fact I couldn't find any that don't intend to link to the military meaning or its colloquial derivative). This indicates to me that "desertion" is the primary topic, and I think redirecting to desertion, with a , is preferable to linking to the AWOL dab page. Your thoughts? --Muchness 06:14, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. The vast majority intend to link to desertion, and I'll change the redirect now. Dekimasuよ! 12:40, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect target
Talk:Newton North High School

message: Given that Wikipedia articles are not complete expositions of all possible details, the level of detail in this section is unnecessary, especially when the only thing the sources provided essentially show is that the school preforms plays.  There is nothing particularly notable or unique about this school's theatre program, which makes this level of detail completely undue and unnecessary. - SudoGhost 19:31, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: We're talking about a suburban high school, here. There isn't much to mention besides academics, facilities, administration, and extracurriculars: sports, theatre, and so on. Your characterization of the 'detail' on the theatre program strikes me as hyperbolic. Why, pray tell, would you want to remove relevant, valuable, and now sourced information from the encylopedia? If unsourced or 'unduly weighted' information is the problem, why not file away at the rest of the article (sports, house system, etc)? I don't want to make assumptions, but it seems to me that your issue is with the perceived unimportance of theatre, nevermind the fact that the program in question is large and - if one reads the sources more closely - notable for its heavy level of student involvement and autonomy. NauticaShades 17:30, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undue Weight 
Talk:Centrifuge Accommodations Module

message: In what context? What is this part of?
It was planned to be a part of the International Space Station. But, due in part do the Space Shuttle problems and cost, was cancelled.Ingres77 20:48, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Context

message: I don't know what specific uses were planned for this vehicle, so I hesitate to put this in the article, but an interesting use would have been to grow an animal from pre-natal to adulthood in 2g. I imagine it would develop a very low-center-of-balance skeleton, and very strong muscular system. [Such an animal would have the time of its life if returned to normal gravity, but would probably come to suffer aches as its body would not be designed for 1g. Certain body areas designed to "push upward" (such as the lower back in humans) would be over-developed in such an animal, and at 1g, they would be constantly pushing up too hard. Sometimes astronauts suffer lower back aches after a time while weightless.]Tragic romance 06:42, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The study of > 1 g effects on development would be very interesting, but it can be done on Earth.  Long term effects of 1/3 and 1/6 g cannot be done on Earth but could have been done on the CAM.  What a loss. 58.147.58.179 (talk) 06:09, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

text: It is unfortunate that this centrifuge, which was the heart of the gravitational biology flight program, was eliminated from the ISS program.  Not only was it essential for basic research, but it also formed the basis for understanding the physiological effects of short radius artificial gravity in a manner needed for effective human artificial gravity prescription.
-- 119.31.121.89 (talk) 22:21, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Specific Uses

message: At what stage is it canceled? Is it build, tested or delivered to NASA already? 212.36.8.100 16:58, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As shown in a photo in the article, the (barely built) shell is in a parking lot at Tsukuba.  It's not in launchable condition (not without several hundred million dollars in outfitting, anyways).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.138.116.38 (talk) 21:23, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current status 

message: When was it decided not to finish and launch the CAM ? Before or after NASA obtained ownership ? The scheduling problems, presumably, were a direct result of the impending retirement in 2010, announced in 2004. - Rod57 (talk) 19:22, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  When was it decided not to finish and launch the CAM
Talk:George Carlin

message: Is there an original source, or original sources, for the AV Club article "Is there a God?" cited?  A very large number of persons are cited within the article itself, and I wonder if the content was only ever originally published as such, or if these are drawn from larger interviews.  The only similar article from the publication that I've seen, with collections of 'polled' answers to a single question from so many persons, is "Who could you take in a fight?", published in 2003.
(Note:  The interviewer is still being titled 'The Onion' in both articles.) Zusty001 (talk) 06:43, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  AV Club article
Talk:Lost and found

message: Either dicdef or not-encyclopedic.  What else could possibly be added to it? ("porn stars who have found something at the lost & found?" perhaps? ;-) Terrapin 19:21, 24 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: From VfD

message: The text should highlight a recent trend, certainly in the UK, whereby Lost Property offices typically charge the claimer to get his/her property back.  This seems to have happened in recent years as places like railway stations have outsourced baggage storage and lost property to private companies.  --ЗAНИA talk WB talk] 23:13, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Charges
Category talk:English athletes

message: All these need to be added to :category:British athletes since they compete as Great Britain, apart from in the Commonwealth Games. Dunc_Harris|☺ 19:25, 24 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: And so this original category should have been retained, and :Category:British athletes made a supercategory of the individual nations, as I said on your talk page. -- Avaragado 19:44, 25 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Yale Repertory Theatre

message: From VfD:
Let's not just pick on Dartmouth. :) Seriously, though, this is just a stub ("Yale Repertory Theatre is part of Yale University") with an external link and has been so such since 1 June. Not notable, I think. See also: Yale Cabaret, Harvard-Yale sister colleges, Yale School of Drama, The Yale Society of Orpheus & Bacchus ... there may be more. --Elf-friend 19:39, 24 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: please don't use the incorrect, so-called "American" spelling. - Nunh-huh 03:55, 25 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, the "post-Noah Webster orthographical reform spelling that had been proposed in the UK but then suddenly got rejected by the British because an American was proposing it, as is discussed in Mencken's The American Language."  If the folks at Yale are using the -re, then that should be the article title, but they should catch up with the 19th century. :-) Geogre 12:59, 25 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair warning: you will be extremely disappointed if you tour America looking for a stage production in a theatre which calls itself a "theater". It's closer to a "stage" vs "movie" difference than a "UK" vs "US" difference; and even in movies it's about a 50% chance it'll be a "theatre". -- Nunh-huh 17:37, 25 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Note
Talk:Celebrity Cruises

message: This page reads like it's from a brochure. Can it possibly be cleaned up to be more NPOV?71.107.230.202 02:05, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Advert-like text

message: I've heard various explanations of the trademark X. Does anyone know what it really means?
:The Greek letter X ("Ch"), for Chandris, the original owner of Celebrity. Chandris used a similar (but not identical) funnel logo for ships in their liner service and for Chandris Fantasy Cruises. - Kjet 09:58, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The X 

message: 66.75.245.141 (talk) 04:14, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Chandris Lines was ocean liner operating subsidiary of Chandris Group that later became Chandris Cruises. Celebrity Cruises is a separate brand, created as a subsidiary of Chandris Group in 1990. Chandris Cruises continued operations even after Celebrity Cruises was founded, ceasing service in 1996. — Kjet (talk · contribs) 12:46, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chandris Lines 

message: This ship has now been launched by its German builders and is taking on passengers in England for its maiden cruise.  Please correct.--dunnhaupt (talk) 20:57, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Celebrity Equinox

message: The link that identifies the Celebrity Reflection makes no mention what so ever of that ship or name. In fact, the link provided indicates there are 4 Solstice ships, not five.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.128.172.62 (talk) 20:26, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Celebrity Reflection" 

message: Hi there, Celebrity Century is no longer part of the fleet. Can this be removed please.
Also, updated the CEO to Lisa Lutoff-Perlo.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.43.115.237 (talk) 15:01, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Celebrity Century