lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:River Cherwell

message: Hi.
This article seemed a little too long on its own... I hope the subsections are okay... if anyone wants to rename them (etc!) feel free to jump in right away!--NeilTarrant 21:24, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Fine by me.. I did go on rather! But you typed 'Shipman' instead of Shipton... well, the former has been in the news this week! Incidentally, can someone explain why the photo was removed? Andy F 02:32, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: @Redrose64 Re your admonition please be careful how you fill in ref params: I use Provelt. I think there are way more important lapses to be corrected on this WP , for example the glaring LACK of sources on this page, dont you think ? Wuerzele (talk) 19:07, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: So there aren't enough sources - that doesn't give you an excuse to add malformed refs, as you did in . Why on earth would you think that  are sensible parameters? --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 22:21, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: @Redrose64 "an excuse to add malformed refs"? Excuse me, Provelt  did it. Adding a source needed  flag is what anyone SHOULD do here. Now Thank you for your time and have a good day, esp finding sources, if you are so concerned about improving WP.--Wuerzele (talk) 19:01, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: As shown at Wikipedia:User scripts, you take full responsibility for any action you perform using any user script. So please don't blame ProveIt. If there is a bug with ProveIt, it may be reported at Wikipedia talk:ProveIt. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 19:18, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  ref parameters
Talk:Elenari

message: Besides not mentioning that this article is on a ficticous race, it also contiains very little information on this subculture (if it qualifies as one).  This returns 663 hits on Google, meaning that it should (probably) be kept, but it needs major changes. Benji 21:53, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Article needing attention

message: I added info on The Corruption and someone removed it claiming I needed to cite a source.  The Elenari FAQ already speaks of it and the source has already been cited.  I think The Corruption's relationship to the Elenari is a significant thing to mention.  I think it should be back, but please rewrite the entire thing if you don't like what I wrote.  Thodin 15:17, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I've done a bit of a rewrite and put it back - please feel free to expand and correct it though, this isn't exactly my area of expertise. :) Vashti 21:37, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: The Corruption

message: I found this from another article, so I don't have much familiarity here.  I wasn't sure which parts of the articles are talking about the Otherkin and which were talking about Tolkien's Elenari.  Particularly, do both groups speak the Elenari language?  Help from other editors is appreciated.  Friday 05:16, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This article deals entirely with the otherkin group who call themselves the Elenari, and not with any of Tolkien's works. Vashti 09:44, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Context?
Talk:Telepolis

message: I put in stuff on 1st printed edition. --hughey 22:12, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: The price was given before the reorientation of the magazine. After 911 Telepolis became a very different, very nasty thing. Honestly, nowadays I would consider it the german breitbart. Sounds like a joke: it once started as a left-wing publication. After the reorientation in 2001 they startet to bring left-wing-conspiracy-theories into right-wing-bubbles and after little adoption they where quickly accepted by the far-right movements like Reichsbürger, Querdenker and so on. Thus proving that the political spectrum is a circle where extremists meet at one point. Crass Spektakel (talk) 01:01, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Talk:Undeath

message: infection: Vampires/werewolves(not exactly undead as they are alive)
Werewolves should not be placed here.  They are not considered "undead" by anyone's standards.  Vampires, on the other hand, are reanimated human corpses returned from the grave to drink the blood of the living.  Although Anne Rice's "vampires" may be living-creatures(?), traditional vampires are most definitely as un-dead as any zombie or mummy.  Until Dracula came along (and for a good long while after), they were just zombies with fangs! --Corvun 22:16, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Symbiogenesis

message: December 3, 2020, Purificación López-García and David Moreira submitted a paper, The Syntrophy hypothesis for the origin of eukaryotes revisited, published in Nature Microbiology, in which they proposed a symbiosis of two bacteria and an archeon as the origin of eukaryotes. I found their proposal utterly convincing and highly recommend a reading of it with a mind to including it in Wikipedia's article, Symbiogenesis.
Reference
Purificación López-García, David Moreira. The Syntrophy hypothesis for the origin of eukaryotes revisited. Nature Microbiology, 2020, 5 (5), pp.655-667. Retrieved from https://hal.science/hal-02988531/document 70.106.237.8 (talk) 18:51, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  Added. The article needs further work now to distinguish current from historic hypotheses; but concepts specific to eukaryogenesis should really be in that article, rather than here which is covering symbiogenesis of all kinds and at all periods. Chiswick Chap (talk) 11:29, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: To add to what the Chap said, this article very much needs updating with recent findings regarding the Asgard archaea. In just the past few years, genomic studies of this archaean group have produced broad scientific consensus that eukaryotes originated from symbiosis between an Asgard archaean and an alphaproteobacteria. The alphaproteobacterial origin of mitochondria has been known a long time and is well-described here. The Asgard archaean origin of the eukaryotic cell is a recent discovery and is almost entirely absent. 2019 paper presents some of the central findings of this discovery. A2soup (talk) 23:25, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text:  Um, I repeat: the origin of the Eukaryotes is Eukaryogenesis --- NOT the subject of this article. And my username is CC, thanks. Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:20, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal: Origin of Eukaryotes Is Symbiosis of Not One But Two Bacteria and an Archeon 

message: How should the proposed nitroplasts be represented in this article?
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.ado8571 2600:8806:3606:C500:7714:DB06:B410:9C2 (talk) 02:22, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: On the basis of one primary research paper? Cautiously, minimally, likely not at all until independent confirmation arrives? Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:01, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text:  See next item: added, given there are now at least 2 papers. Chiswick Chap (talk) 05:58, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nitroplasts 

message: Two lifeforms merge into one organism for first time in a billion years
‘The first time it happened, it gave rise to all complex life,’ scientists say
Anthony Cuthbertson  | Independent | 2024-04-26
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/algae-evolution-agriculture-plant-history-b2535143.html
Enquire (talk) 19:27, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Cryptic. The article doesn't even name the original paper, but I've found it and added a brief section. Chiswick Chap (talk) 05:57, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two lifeforms merge into one organism for first time in a billion years
Talk:Nonverbal communication

message: Nonverbal communication represents two-thirds of all communications. – how exactly was this number achieved? The sources don’t seem to mention that.--Ąžuolas (talk) 10:46, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Importance

message: May want to consider adding information, especially in education, about the emergence of accessibility and screen readers and how they effect nonverbal communication.Clmoody1 (talk) 17:37, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding in section on accessibility and screen readers 

message: Does communicating through media outlets cause confusion due to lack of visual nonverbal communication?
Vmm1234! (talk) 19:47, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nonverbal Communication question 

message: The WP:LEADSENTENCE and the rest of the lead could do a better job at defining the scope of the article . For example, I assume this article does not include sign language, and yet, I don't see anything in the title or the lead that would exclude that from the article. Mathglot (talk) 06:33, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scope of the article 

message: Proxemics and other topics are explained twice in the article. Can someone edit it? 
I have other plans at the moment and I am not yet wiki-savvy. Lamadesbois (talk) 20:53, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redondance 

message: Difference between verbal or non ver
bal 2409:4051:4E0D:734F:0:0:C40A:E114 (talk) 16:41, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Behae182 

message: — Assignment last updated by Disembodied Poetics (talk) 21:02, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Criticism as Praxis

message: — Assignment last updated by Geminigoblin (talk) 15:04, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: 2023SP Communication Research Methods

message: — Assignment last updated by Malharami (talk) 22:52, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: MIT 398 Intercultural International Communication

message: — Assignment last updated by Mdg076 (talk) 20:35, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Communication Theory

message: — Assignment last updated by AidanPBSC (talk) 15:41, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Honors SPC 1017 Fall 2023
Talk:Luna Lovegood

message: Discussion ported over to Harry Potter WikiProject: Merge Proposal Luna Lovegood and Neville Longbottom. As this discussion is redundant;y repeated over at Neville Longbottom, it is best to consolidate the discussion at the wikiproject level. - Arcayne (cast a spell) 12:33, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge Proposal

message: I can remember at least for a time ago characters had a "first mentioned" or something if they were mentioned in a book before appearing. I looked at Sirius Black and he didn't have it left but a line read "Sirius was first mentioned briefly in Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone", Does something similar get mentioned for Luna and Xeno mentioned in Goblet of Fire as "the Lovegoods" and that they hadn't gotten tickets to the World Cup? — chandler — 17:52, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  First appearance, both Luna and Xeno. 

message: I have a few things that I think should be mentioned in this article I will change some of these things myself, I'm just making this so people know why I edited them.
1) Should Luna's middle name be included at the beginning of the article? The articles for Ron Weasley and Hermione Granger both included the character's middle names in the first sentence,but the Luna article does not include her middle name, Elizabeth.
2)Luna and her father are mentioned in Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire, page 73 (chapter six.) In the article on Sirius Black, the first paragraph mentions that Sirius Black was alluded to in book one, so I assume a similar statement would be helpful for this article. 
3) In the other articles for major HP characters,the section at the beginning included "full name" before "Spouse" and after "House". Assuming these articles have the correct formatting, a full name should be included in that section.
This is all I can see right now, I hope this is helpful.
--71.36.193.251 (talk) 01:30, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: You have repeatedly added that supposed middle name without any reliable sources to back it up. Please stop. —El Millo (talk) 01:46, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

text: Pinging @Icecream94826 in case he/she wants to comment. @71.36.193.251, please provide a reliable source for you middle name addition or it will be removed. — Twassman [Talk·Contribs] 02:08, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It's actually the opposite. It will be added (or kept) once it has a reliable source. The status quo is not including it, and unsourced content recently added should be removed at once. —El Millo (talk) 02:45, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

text: I've checked the Harry Potter wiki, which seldom requires reliable sources for inclusion, and it isn't even included there. —El Millo (talk) 02:49, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestions for the article
Talk:Pedro de Mendoza

message: Could possibly add the map from [es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gobernación_del_Río_de_la_Plata_y_del_Paraguay here] to clarify the limits of the territory. The Spanish article has much more information on him, if anyone can translate it, but it doesn't seem to be a stub article either. -LlywelynII (talk) 07:33, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corrected information about the Grant 
Talk:Mary Elizabeth Lease

message: The claim in the intro that she supported both temperance and woman's suffrage needs a citation. Richard White in The Republic for Which it Stands: The United States During Reconstruction and the Gilded Age, 1865-1896 states the following on page 748 of the paperback edition:
Mary Elizabeth Lease of Kansas -- "Queen Mary of the Alliance" and perhaps its leading orator -- denounced demands for prohibition and women's suffrage as absurd. The key was economic reform.
White cites Charles Postel's The Populist Vision where he writes on page 95:
Mary Elizabeth Lease, the "Queen Mary of the Alliance," left St. Louis ridiculing the demands for prohibition and suffrage as "absurd" when compared to the economic reforms needed by the farmers. Lease would later earn a reputation for erratic and vindictive positions. But on this point she shared ground with those who believed that suffrage and politics were secondary to the economics of women's liberation.
This doesn't preclude her endorsing the policies but everything I've seen has put her as someone who was not a vocal advocate of either policy. Jleberle (talk) 00:58, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Temperance and Suffrage Support
Talk:St Joseph's College, Hunters Hill

message: What happened during the period 1968-70? No headmaster during that period? If so, then surely a Deputy would have been in charge? In any case, there ought to be an explanation in the article's text.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.168.141.14 (talk) 11:48, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: It's empty because as for the period 1894 to 1955 I didn't have the detail. I had hoped by now that a current student would have filled it in. I seem to recall there's an honour roll on display at the College somewhere. -Sticks66 13:13, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: List of Headmasters

message: I was just wondering why the major sub-headings are the size of the article heading: i propose that every sub heading should be one size smaller - and will endeavour to edit the article in this fashion right now. Rcm 10:29, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Headings

message: The :Image:JoeysHH1930s.jpg doesn't look much like Joey's main building and the landscaping bears no resemblance to the terrain around the school.  I assert that this photo is not of Joey's in spite of the contributor getting it from the State Library archive. I will remove if anyone agrees with me -Sticks66 (talk) 11:56, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photograph 

message: This article is one of a  number selected for the early stage of the trial of the Wikipedia:Pending Changes system on the English language Wikipedia. All the articles listed at Wikipedia:Pending changes/Queue   are being considered for level 1 pending changes protection.
The following request appears on that page:
Comments on the suitability of theis page for "Pending changes"  would be appreciated.
Please update the Queue page as appropriate.
Note that I am not involved in this project any much more than any other editor, just posting these notes since it is quite a big change, potentially
Regards, Rich Farmbrough, 00:08, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Pending changes

message: This article, particularly in the co-curricular section, seems very much like a promotion of the college.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.164.152.137 (talk) 09:29, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  More promotional that informative?
Talk:New Norway

message: I changed Bobblewik's conversion from km2 to hectares for clarity because agricultural land is simply not refered to by the km. Especially given this location and historical context.--Bookandcoffee 16:40, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Found this very good writeup on Norwegian settlement and also this from the U Sask.Skookum1 (talk) 10:26, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  resources for expansion
Talk:From the Screen to Your Stereo

message: So umm, the article mentions a bonus song on the vinyl record, but what is it?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.121.34.248 (talk) 15:45, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The article has been updated to include that information. 23.30.58.238 (talk) 19:33, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Vinyl Bonus Song?
Talk:Mad Season (Matchbox Twenty album)

message: See Talk:Mad Season (band)#Requested move. —Centrx→talk • 03:06, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: Hi there! I think I've made a right mess of the table. Darn. 
But besides that, I'm positive I heard "Crutch" on my local rock station when this album came out. Did anyone else?
Bufftractor53 09:43, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Um

message: Does anyone know where the picture on the album cover comes from? (It looks like it's from some classical painting.) -- 128.104.112.106 (talk) 20:17, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Album Cover 

message: does this have any correlation to the band of the same name?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.17.152.183 (talk) 21:22, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  mad season  

message: I included the post-grunge label on Mad Season, I had a source were the reviewer from Billboard said that, On Mad Season, the band nerves up another slick collection of R.E.M. and Pearl Jam influence post-grunge classic rock. That same source is a Billboard magazine review, it is massively similar to the pop rock source, the pop rock source is also a billboard magazine review but what makes the pop rock source so special and the post-grunge source which is pretty much a billboard magazine reviewer just like the pop rock source so fake? When it's also reviewed by a professional reviewer?( Strangeguy91 (talk) 01:35, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Post-grunge label source is similar to the pop rock source.
Talk:More Than You Think You Are

message: I noticed in the "personnel" section, it doesn't credit Kyle Cook as having played banjo on Unwell. Is there any specific reason? I have this album and I can't help but notice the banjo solos in the song. I watched the video on YouTube many times and I saw Kyle Cook playing banjo towards the end of the video. I also know that the banjo isn't used very often in popular music. I consider this song to be "alternative music" between the banjo and the French Horns. Is there any specific reason why they didn't give Cook credit for playing the banjo? If so, explain.--Kevjgav (talk) 02:48, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kyle Cook playing banjo on "Unwell" 
Talk:Yourself or Someone Like You

message: Not one song on the CD talks about DOMESTIC VIOLENCE.. sorry.. hard core matchbox fan... I find the need to correct the wikipedia.  Push is about a girl finding it hard to deal with the emotional struggle whithin herself.  So she is explaining to the other half of her relationship that since she has dealt with emotional problems in the past, she will take it out on him/her or whatever EMOTIONALLY.  Push you around, means to walk on you, take advantage of, TAKE YOU FOR GRANTED. And its the GIRL doing the pushing.. first two words.. listen up are..  SHE SAID.. 24.238.252.14
I rvt it back, b/c some previous author was adding a certain air of POV when describing the fan response.  Critical reception and album sales don't necessarily have a positive correlation. --Madchester 16:50, August 18, 2005 (UTC)
#You didn't revert just that part; you reverted my corrections to links, style, etc.  I've had this from adolescent users; that an admin should behave this way is unacceptable.  I'm taking this to AN/I. --Mel Etitis  (Μελ Ετητης) 17:35, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: In my last edit, I changed the name of the from 'Twenty' to '20' simply because that is the name used for this album alone. - Thanks, Hoshie 21:43, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  band name 

message: There are at least five singles from this album:
* Long Day
* Push
* 3 AM
* Real World
* Back 2 Good
But I also thought that Girl Like That and Busted were also singles.  Can anyone confirm this? Geeky Randy 04:24, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Singles 
Talk:Mazda R360

message: In reality this car is heavier than the documented 380kg.  One of these cars is owned by a family member and on a weighbridge a few months ago the car was 440kg (to a resolution of 20kg).  The previous registration sticker (dated 1978) listed the weight as 430kg. The user manual for the car says 380kg, but this does not agree with the measured weight.  If you want any specific photos taken for this article please let me know via my talk page. John Dalton (talk) 07:12, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Weight in article is incorrect?

message: The first model of the Mazda R360 came with a 4 speed manual gearbox Michae86l (talk) 21:53, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  First generation Mazda R360 (KRBB) 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.mazdar360.com/history. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  John of Reading (talk) 08:52, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed