lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Lydia of Thyatira

message: From Easton's 1897 Bible Dictionary (public domain):
:A woman of Thyatira, a "seller of purple," who dwelt in Philippi (Acts 16:14, 15). She was not a Jewess but a proselyte. The Lord opened her heart as she heard the gospel from the lips of Paul (16:13). She thus became the first in Europe who embraced Christianity. She was a person apparently of considerable wealth, for she could afford to give a home to Paul and his companions.
Centrx 02:17, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: in ortodox bible she is called Lydia of Macedonia or Macedonian woman named Lydia.
here's a quote from ortodoxwiki.org: The words of The Acts quoted below describe Lydia’s meeting with the Apostle Paul on his second missionary journey about the year 50. Paul and his companions started their journey visiting the established churches in western Asia Minor when he answered a vision in which he saw a man dressed in a Macedonian manner calling upon him to “Come over to Macedonia and help us.“89.205.2.29 (talk) 23:21, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Lydia of Macedonia
Talk:Electronic brakeforce distribution

message: component of electronic brake distribution ?
How  to work
* What? Janipewter 00:49, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

message: This article is factually wrong.  The "how it works" deals with the basic operating principles of ABS.  EBD is in fact a way of managing the braking effort applied to the wheels  - but only relates to differences between front and rear axles.  EBD does NOT "adjust" braking effort across a single axle!  -- Teutonic Tamer 17:11, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong descriptions 

message: After reading carefully this article, I think that the "how it works" description is like the Cornering Brake Control (CBC) system of BMW. The
only error is that CBC is an evolution from EBD, so it should be modified.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by K rakol (talk • contribs) 01:12, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not so wrong 
Talk:Asociación de Antropólogos Iberoamericanos en Red

message: sounds like kind of a loose wiki--Hacky 02:21, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've already linked both "AIBR" and "Asociación de Antropólogos Iberoamericanos en Red" to this article. --Kmp589 22:02, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Shubert family

message: The text below was stuck at the end of the article, and appears to be taken from another source, possibly copyrighted -LeflymanTalk 02:21, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed from article

message: My father, Georgie Price, under contract to the Shuberts, toured on what was known as the "Keith circuit".  There's a chapter about him in The Brothers Shubert.Unfree (talk) 16:09, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Keith Circuit

message: * what about some info on the current/ living  Shuberts?  --Mdukas (talk) 05:58, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Questions, comments, suggestions
Talk:Chrysler Saratoga

message: I have reverted 93JC's deletion of "instrument clusters" from the list of differences between North American-market Dodge Spirits and international ECE Chrysler Saratogas, 1989-1994. The differences aren't major, but they are present: The US cluster has a "BRAKE" warning lamp, while the ECE cluster has the ISO symbol for parking brake/brake failure (the last production run of US clusters had both the word and the symbol). The speedometer is calibrated and marked differently on the ECE cluster than it is on Metric versions of the North American cluster, as well. Scheinwerfermann 02:23, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: My very own Spirit ('90 Canadian-market ES V6) has the ISO parking brake/brake failure light. 1992-1995 Canadian-market Spirits featured the same 220 km/h speedometer as the Saratoga.--93JC 03:35, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

text: I'll have to trust you on the speedometer. Seems like a waste of time to have two completely different 220 km/h speedometers, but it doesn't surprise me. But my instrument cluster is bone stock, so on that point you're nuts. :p --93JC 13:36, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

text: It's a waste to have two different sets of regulations. It's hard to believe two different sets of calibrations are needed, yet quite easy to believe they exist. Know what I mean? I know there's a 200 km/h speedo: mine has one. Didn't know about the 240 km/h though. The Spirit has been in the family since new, so although it hasn't been mine per se I do know its history, and it never had the instrument cluster replaced. Besides, I'm pretty sure that set of warning lights is a separate overlay, not integral to the rest of the gauges.--93JC 19:28, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Instrument clusters

message: 1995 it is. Source of info: actual-vehicle VINs from 1994 and 1995 European-market Saratogas. Running these VINs through DC's build record database reveals them to have been built as Saratogas, not converted from US-market AA-cars. It appears Chrysler International largely stopped advertising the Saratoga after 1993, which is a little bizarre given that they were still making the cars, but isn't too far out of line with US practice: The Spirit and Acclaim were promoted in '89, '90 and '91, and somewhat in '92, but almost not at all in '93, '94 or '95. Scheinwerfermann 01:08, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Final year of AA-body Saratoga

message: The information that 1960 was the saratoga's last year untill the re-badged euro model in 1989 is incorrect. The Saratoga was available for purchase till at least 1964 as the Canadian model of the Newport/Windsor.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rhamzkull (talk • contribs) 01:01, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  1961-1964 Saratoga
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Infinity0/Evidence

message: Note: I believe that Kitteneatkitten is a sockpuppet. He's only had his account for a few weeks and apparently has a lot of vitriol for me that is unexplainable. It could even be infinity0 for all we know. Also, he accuses me of personal attacks, but can't provide any evidence of it because it never happened. RJII 02:28, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

message: Interesting to note that the only examples RJII can find of me making "personal attacks" are:
*Making a good-faith attempt to progress with the article 
*Being exasperated at his hostility 
*Ditto 
*Being frustrated at a vandal. 
Also interesting to note is that RJII even now refuses to acknowledge that he is extremely aggressive and uncompromising, instead accusing other editors (ie. User:Kitteneatkitten) of "a lot of vitriol" and sockpuppetry. I have exams and certainly no time to run a sockpuppet to annoy RJII, even if I had any desire to. -- infinity0 22:40, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Interesting evidence
Talk:Cadet College Hasan Abdal

message: alumni need blue linking
Victuallers 17:18, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled 

message: Following is needed in this article:
* College Color
* College Motto
* House Mottos
* Better Monogram
* Year of Establishment for each house
Asfandyar (talk) 16:51, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needed for this Article
Talk:New York State Route 16

message: I was doing some work on the I-190 exit list today, and in the process, I found myself wondering what path NY 16, which parallels the expressway south and east of downtown, takes through Buffalo. The trip-planning software that I use, as well as Google Maps, shows NY 16 entering downtown on Seneca Street, and continuing on Seneca past Swan Street's eastern terminus to Harriet Tubman Way then Swan then to Ellicott Street, where it ends at NY 5. The distance measurement in the Erie County NYSDOT traffic count, however, indicates that NY 16 remains on Swan Street from its start at Seneca Street to Ellicott Street. On the other hand, the DOT map shows NY 16 running north on Swan and south on Seneca.
Does anyone know which of these, if any, is the correct routing? --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 22:05, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Routing through downtown Buffalo?
Talk:Maxi (Soulcalibur)

message: What I've added is found on the old Soul Archive site. His profile there is much longer than the one translated officially. Besides Maxi's past and his training with Li Long/Zhang Wu, there's an overly detailed description of Astaroth's ambush on his ship. 
For the original place, here's the link: Old Soul Archive Maxi Profile
For a translated version, among other interesting things, check this link: Soulcalibur3.us translation forum
(Johnny Master 02:42, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: About the profile

message: Okay, this is pretty much just like the old character analysis section from before. I'm removing these for the same reason people from before deleted the character analysis section. If you want to find out why, check out Taki's and Kilik's talk pages. If people want a strategy guide, they should go to fansites. Mythmonster2 (talk) 06:25, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Gameplay
Talk:USS Randolph (CV-15)

message: Here is a 45 minute video about the 53-54 Mediterranean cruise. My dad was on board as a Skyraider pilot and LSO. I don't know where to put it on the page of the article. 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eFZ1_jlVDnE
Jackhammer111 (talk) 23:25, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It listed under "External links" (fyi) - wolf 04:36, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: cruise video
Talk:Christopher McKay

message: Some suggestions for improvement as the article is expanded:
*Template:Infobox Scientist should be added 
*Some basic biographical information required, including date and place of birth, further educational details, positions held with dates etc
*Lead needs expanding and should emphasise reasons for notability of subject
*Specific information on research should be added  
*Information on research should be expanded
*External link(s) present which could be used to expand article
Espresso Addict 09:53, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Review comments

message: As a "scientist", one of his significant and notable activities is authoring papers published in peer-reviewed journals (and other peer-reviewed modes). A list of his most significant publications should be included here.174.130.71.156 (talk) 00:51, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Publications
Talk:Districts of Nauru

message: Help altering the map would be greatly appreciated.  Only one thing needs changed.  "Nauruische Distrikte" needs to state "Districts of Nauru" or "Nauruan Districts."  The names of the districts and towns are exactly the same in English as German.  Thanks.  GilliamJF 02:51, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Map

message: Anetan is probably the most attractive district in Nauru.It consists mostly of related residents who look out for each other whenever needed.It also has a small Baptist church there,the only church in the district.Anetan is also known as the place where you find your rest(a.k.a. paradise) because of the cool breeze that passes through this district.If asked by a local where to find peace and rest they (if they know Nauru well)will recommend Anetan.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 113.20.73.12 (talk) 08:41, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anetan 

message: Meneng is a very beautiful district(Beau-elle's district).It is known  to be nice and inviting yet Meneng is also known to the Nauruans to be a very communist district.Through it all it is still part of Nauru and Nauru would never be complete without it.For conclusion one should know that MENENG IS THE BEST!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 113.20.73.12 (talk) 08:50, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meneng 

message: Aiwo is a place for tigers only.Its the hidden heart of Nauru it is what we called the 'BLACK & YELLOW land of the Jungle.We rule the land of Nauru.It exports phosphate out of Nauru it has the oldest harbour that is still going beautifully.Aiwo has a tennis,basketball court and a football oval(Linkbelt Oval).It is really fascinating and fulfilling to any one who seeks solace and pleasure.It is a place where one's true color is seen and aggression is all part of the game!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 113.20.73.12 (talk) 09:11, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aiwo 

message: I propose merging this article into the main Nauru article and redirecting to there. It's very short - it's basically a list and the conent could be better expanded (we could have more information about the role of the districts) if it was being seen by more people. Nauru isn't particularly well-known, and if a reader wants an overview of the country they are less to visit related articles. Additionally, the Nauru article could benefit from the map on this page, and it seems silly duplicating it both here and there. Does anybody oppose a merger? -- Peter Talk page 22:21, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Propose merger to [[Nauru]]
Talk:1st Provisional Marine Brigade

message: The first sentence states:
"The 1st Provisional Marine Brigade was a Marine infantry brigade of the United States Marine Corps (USMC) that existed..."
Later on, numerous non-infantry units are identified as part of this Brigade in its numerous inceptions. Although all U.S. Marines are considered to be infantry, I recommend that the first sentence be changed to:
"The 1st Provisional Marine Brigade was a United States Marine Corps (USMC) unit that existed..."
to properly reflect that many components in the Brigade were not primarily infantry.
As a former USMC officer with Military Occupational Specialties (MOS) designations in Motor Transport, Infantry and Tanks, I served in numerous Battalion Landing Teams (BLTs) and Marine Amphibious Units (MAUs) that consisted of numerous smaller supporting units around a larger infantry unit.
BTW. I believe Fehrenbach's This Kind of War can be used as a reference that the Brigade was called "The Fire Brigade" as it was used as the reserve for all major North Koreans attacks that threatened to break the Pusan perimeter.
Trivia: At that time, Marines leggings had a green side and a brown side. Marines were often passed the word "green side out" or "brown side out." After several defeats inflicted upon them by the Marine Brigade at Pusan, the North Koreans troops were told to avoid combat with troops wearing leggings. After the U.S. forces learned of us, the Marines were told "no side out," i.e. take the leggings off so the North Korneans would not know they were facing Marines.  Fehrenbach mentions this in his book (if I remember correctly).
Nice job on the article!
Thomas R. Fasulo (talk) 17:11, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Like all infantry units, this one is not 100 percent infantry. Instead, it gets its name because it is an operational unit designed to fight as an infantry unit. Like all units, it needs support forces but that does not change the nature of its job. —Ed!(talk) 05:01, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, every Marine is a Rifleman, only Marines with the 03 prefix for their MOS are Infantry.  I've only heard former Marines who didn't serve in the Infantry try to claim they could do my job in addittion to whatever their MOS was.  They sure weren't Infantry when they were riding in a HUMMVEE or smoking and joking in an air cooled office and I was humping 30 miles carrying 3/4 of my body weight in weapons and gear in 100+ degree heat!  :)--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 01:06, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  All Marines are infantry, but...
Talk:Morton N. Cohen

message: I have made a start but if anyone could provide more background, espcially to do with his position over the "Carroll Myth"  controversy, that would be helpful.
--Dee-Dee 02:59, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: After rewriting all 5 listings, I added 5 more from LC and WorldCat library records. (Relevant LC catalog records: pertains to 1958; 1960 ; 1965 ; 1979 ; 2003 US ed.)
Other LC records that credit Cohen, which cover 6 other works (not editions):
* 1960 writing guide 
* 1966 public address on Kipling 
* 1979 Nude studies (photos) 
* 1979 Russian journal of Henry Parry Liddon, LCSNA Carroll Studies #3 
* 1980 the Kitchins (more letters and photos), LCSNA Carroll Studies #4 
* 1982 Alice (exhibition) 
--P64 (talk) 18:09, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Selected works
Talk:Raminator (truck)

message: This article apparently recieved a major rewrite, and while the historical information appears to be true I question the validity of some of the popularity and "dominance" parts of the article. I admit that I am not a big fan of the truck (I am a Monster Jam fan and tend to follow those trucks) so I may be biased myself, but I just wonder what others think. Arenacale 03:05, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV Statements?

message: I agree that this article doesn't exactly seem neutral.  And what is "finickle?"  I've heard of "finicky," but not that. Kouvre 15:26, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: Cale
Talk:Barnes G-function

message: For the intervall [-2:-1] the function has negative values. For the intervall [-3:-2] the function has positive values.
You can simply check this by applying the recurence formula backward, starting at 0.5 to -0.5, -1.5, -2.5, ...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.237.39.220 (talk) 18:32, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  There is a error in the plotted graph
Talk:Battle of Cherbourg

message: Nice work!--Caliga10 13:12, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi there. On .de and on commons there are some nice images and on http://www.army.mil/cmh-pg/BOOKS/WWII/utah/utah.htm you can find very useful free (PD) text. Regards, John N. 13:21, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

message: I suggest deleting the Fiction section - it looks quite random, considering the huge amount of "Fiction" that deals with the topic. And it's not very informative, either. --Astat (talk) 14:20, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fiction 

message: Is there any patricular reason for the 'Result' in the Info box being an 'Allied victory'? On reading and editing the article, I can find no mention of any non American unit. Indeed, this quote from the intro: "American troops isolated and then captured the fortified port" seems to sum it up (as it is meant to). In the 'view history', I note that the 'Result' has changed once or twice between an 'Allied' and an 'American' victory. If the Americans were the only Allies involved in the Battle of Cherbourg, then doen't that make it an American victory?
RASAM (talk) 20:44, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Result

message: The coordinates giving in the article are nowhere near Cherbourg and in fact link me to a field in Northern France, almost 250 km from the site of the battle. Could someone please correct this as I am not sure on how. DragonFury (talk) 22:16, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  incorrect Coordinates 

message: And it's at the bottom of said article, i think it needs improving. Death Editor 2 (talk) 15:14, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  There is one reference in this entire article
Talk:Inishmore

message: I had a recent visit and the locals there say the the island is refered to as Árainn Mhór or Árainn. I have named the article as such.
:Thats irrelevant as to how its named here. Also, Arranmore is identically named in Irish, which would cause problems if the Irish name was to be used on the Wikipeda.  --Kiand 23:34, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: These are two totally different islands, so why would anyone suggest a merge? ww2censor 16:35, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed. I took down the merge tags and replaced them with hatnotes linking to each other. User:Angr 10:12, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  No merge 

message: The name is very generic Gaelic for "large island" and it's no surprise that there might be more than one of them.  Perhaps the best way to handle this would be with a disambiguation page?
:What other islands are their that in English are called Inishmore for which we would need a disambiguation page? If there are none then there is no need and no point. Perhaps on the Ga it might be needed. ww2censor 22:32, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation? 

message: that the name Inishmore "...was purposely made all most the same as it rival country's name out of spite..." need reference. That " 	
Inishmore is currently at war with it's rival country Ishmore mainly due to the changing of Robot Jitler's batteries here in Inishmore. " makes no sense. I have reverted these edits again, please do not add them without discussing it here first. Finnrind 11:08, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  recent reverts 

message: Nice image of the cross...but are these "arty" pics encyclopedic? (Sarah777 23:08, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: From a very outside point-of-view I would say no to that, I'd much rather have another picture that describes what Inishmore nature and/or buildings actually looks like. Nice picture though ;) Finn Rindahl 23:19, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: The painting by Dousseau is not of the seven churches. It appears to be a painting of Glendalough in Co. Wicklow.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.16.192.78 (talk) 11:52, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Would it belong to this category? Lotje (talk) 13:06, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong painting 
Talk:Saintonge War

message: This section claims there was a first Hundred Years War, from 1159 to 1259 (which is news to me!): There is no corroboration for this, and the only source given is a) unrelated, and b) doesn't seem to support the statement it's attached to. So I suggest if nothing turns up that it be deleted as original research. Thoughts? Moonraker12 (talk) 23:37, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical background note
Talk:Joey Scouts

message: when did joey scouts start up? Cached 11:40, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Singular measure

message: so why not call this article "mutually singular measures" like the first line says? --itaj 04:01, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  mutually singular 

message: let (\Omega,\Sigma), be a measurable space.
i'm talking here about real-value signed finite measures on this space.
let M be a set of measures.
let N be the set of all measures absolutely continuous with respect to a measure in the linear span of measures in M. i.e. 
N := \{ \nu : \exists \mu\in span(M)\ (\nu<<\mu) \} 
for a measure \mu i'll denote  {singl}(\mu) := \{ \nu : \nu\perp\mu \} . the set of measures mutually singular to \mu.
and for a set of measures L.  {Singl}(L) := \{ \nu : \forall \mu\in L\ (\mu\perp\nu) \} . the set of all measures mutually singular to all measures in L.
my question is if the above implies that  N = Singl(Singl(N)) 
i know this is true if there's only one measure in M, but i need to know about infinite set M, countable and bigger. --itaj 04:05, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If span is in the sense of vector spaces, then no.  Consider M:=\{\delta_n:n\in N\}.  Then \sum 2^{-n}\delta_n\not\in span(M) or N, but it is in singl(singl(N)).  (Cj67 23:39, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  a question
Talk:El Mariachi

message: Where is the source for this statement? "inspiring a new wave of young producers to film low-budget movies such as Clerks. and The Blair Witch Project."  I've personally never heard Kevin Smith mention Rodriguez as the source of his inspiration to Clerks.  Codus 18:41, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources
Talk:Bush Christmas

message: I just added in a brief plot summary plus updated the cast, however I was curious about the image used for the film on this page.  Looking at it, it would appear to be the video cover/poster for the 1947 version of the film, not the 1983 one this article talks about.  Does anyone know of an image that can be used for this film?210.50.176.124 (talk) 10:58, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Film image?