lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Mount Kumgang

message: I suggest a merger of this article with Kumgangsan Tourist Region for the following reasons:
* The two are completely interdependent, and
* the Tourist Region article merely describes the economic (and political) use of the area around the mountain.
Kokiri 30 June 2005 15:17 (UTC)
However, the range would be there whether the actual reigon existed or not. I merley suggest a re-structuring of the two articles - In particular, the movement of the infomation on tourism to the Kumgangsan Tourist Region page, and the addition of geographicla, as oppossed to economic and political infomation to the Kumgangsan page.
User: Bobkindles
: Agreed. --Menchi 3 July 2005 10:14 (UTC)
:Note: above was in response to Kokiri's suggestion, not the subsequent one. -- Visviva 12:04, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: If we knew anything at all about the political structure, population, etc., of the Kumgangsan Tourist Region, I would oppose this merge.  As it stands, though, it seems unlikely that the KTR article will ever come to contain anything aside from general information about the "Kumgangsan area" -- which may or may not actually be pertinent to whatever region is within the boundaries of the KTR.  -- Visviva 12:04, 13 July 2005 (UTC)

text: Opposed Generally speaking it's a bad idea to merge articles dealing with physical and political features into one.  The latter are transient and change while the former are stable by and large. Caerwine 16:11, 4 August 2005 (UTC)

text: Opposed Per Caerwine. Also this has been open quite sometime. Since nothing is done, maybe it's time to remove the tag. Davidpdx 15:23, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think a merger would be a good idea. This article covers the Tourist Region. There is no need for a separate article.--Jack Upland (talk) 05:12, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger 

message: This mountain has no co-ordinates. Also, somebody could write a short paragraph in the origin of the name Diamond Mountain, or the role of the mountain in literature/poetry in East Asia, or some of the legends that involve Kumgangsan… Kokiri 30 June 2005 16:08 (UTC)
:I've done the co-ordinates, but the stuff on the name and legends I haven't. Kokiri 13:30, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  More information that could be added… 

message: I removed the merge notice today. It's been open for seven months and only drawn three or four comments. Davidpdx 
13:38, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of Merger Notice 

message: I've changed the {coord} to 38°39′24.35″N 128°06′17.65″E which fits the Google Earth location and all the other attributes of the mountain. The previous {coord} took you to a valley within the DMZ. Coinmanj (talk) 23:43, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location 

message: Based on Wikipedia:Naming_conventions_(Korean)#Mountains, shouldn't this be moved to Kumgangsan? --Fujiiy (talk) 03:26, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:List of rivers of Ireland

message: I understand that the intention is to present those rivers which reach the sea in clockwise order (although this hasn't been done yet with those emptying into the Atlantic) - but what about the order of tributary rivers in relation to the larger stream? (Perhaps clockwise too, starting from the lowest on the right bank of the larger stream?) -- Picapica 17:40, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  List order 

message: :Do we need to have every spit, dribble and trickle in County Dublin as part of this article? One has to wade through (pardon the pun!) over a hundred such rivulets to access info on proper rivers!Johnnyf1nn (talk) 21:35, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dublin Rivers 

message: This article is very similar to the "Rivers of Ireland". I think it makes sense to merge the two articles. --Wanfried-Dublin (talk) 20:47, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with "Rivers of Ireland" - very similar 

message: Target standards for Wikipedia Lists:
* 1. Prose; overall, features professional standards of writing.
* 2. Lede; has an engaging lede, of appropriate length (not trying to be an article) that introduces the subject, and defines the scope, and inclusion criteria.
* 3. Comprehensiveness: comprehensively covers the defined scope, providing where practical a complete set of items, but at least all of the major items.  Where appropriate, has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information, of appropriate length, and taking account of any separate articles which might exist or be reasonably likely to exist given notability requirements, about selected items.
* 4. Structure; is easy to navigate and includes, where helpful, section headings and table sort facilities.
* 5. Style. It complies with the Manual of Style, including making suitable use of text layout, formatting, tables, and color, and with a minimal proportion of redlinked items, and has images and other media, if appropriate to the topic, that follow Wikipedia's usage policies, with succinct captions (and non-free images and other media satisfy the criteria for the inclusion of non-free content and are labeled accordingly).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.96.68.130 (talk) 10:36, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  List standards
Talk:Trans-Labrador Highway

message: For some reason the Gov't of Newfoundland & Labrador has removed the page (or possibly changed the name) for the TLH snow removal photos.  These were located from a link from the road conditions homepage for WS&T (http://www.roads.gov.nl.ca/roadreport-information.stm).  StormPost (http://www.stormpost.com) might be another source to contact if the link to the previous image can't be reestablished. Cheers, Plasma east 19:10, 19 Aug 2004 (UTC)

message: "The section from Churchill Falls to Goose Bay is not fully upgraded, and ordinary automobiles are not recommended for this section."
Is that old information or something? My brother made the trip along Route 500 to Goose Bay and back twice (in 2 seperate years) in a 93 Honda Civic. Only problems he had were a flat tire, loads of dust and a dented muffler. My mother and stepfather also made the trip one time in an 1986 Buick Century. 142.166.232.2323:14, 30 June 2006 
* I was just wondering the same.  I drove it back in 2003 in a Honda Civic and it seemed fine.  I'd say that section was a lot better than the Quebec road between Labrador City and Baie-Comeau! Perhaps should be deleted.Nfitz 16:37, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ordinary cars not recommended for Route 500? 

message: Is that Image:TLH warning sign.PNG photograph appropriate?  It's nearly 10-years old, and seems to date the reconstruction to Goose Bay.  You can pretty much drive much of it now at 100 km/hr without having to move the steering wheel much ... and I don't recall seeing that sign! Nfitz 16:45, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photograph of sign on page 

message: Is there a better photo that could be used that's not the same family vacation photo, twice?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.187.233.34 (talk) 16:10, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Family vacation photo? 

message: Can we add https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Route_500_(Terre-Neuve-et-Labrador) as a French version of this page? I don't know how to do that. Thanks!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.222.252.25 (talk) 03:20, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page translation
Talk:Flood geology

message: There are three short-footnote references whose source information is missing in the article: Snelling 2006, Wilson 2001 and Mathews 2009.  If any editors with more familiarity with the subject area than me can track the sources down, please add them in the "References" section at the end of the article.  Thanks, Wham2001 (talk) 17:43, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. tgeorgescu (talk)  23:26, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Excellent – thank-you! Wham2001 (talk) 16:24, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing sources 

message: The labelling as pseudoscience is not supported by the cited article, which does not provide an actual or multiple examples of the use of pseudoscience. Furthermore the cited article mixes up two examples for the use of pseudoscience. The article cited is not suitable to support the claim. 83.150.41.5 (talk) 14:03, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Which "cited article" do you mean? We have several sources for this ignorant claptrap being pseudoscience. --Hob Gadling (talk) 14:27, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  labelling as "pseudoscience" 

message: The 1980 eruption of Mount Saint Helens caused many prominent geological events which unfolded just as Creation science and catastrophism says they would. This is documented on YouTube by several different respectable sources. AAEexecutive (talk) 23:37, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Geological catastrophes happen, mainstream science does not deny it. However, creation science is pseudoscience. tgeorgescu (talk)  00:06, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

text: YouTube is not a reliable source. Dimadick (talk) 09:18, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

text: Okay. If you would like to get some reliable secondary sources that agree with the theory you set forth and add them to the article, you may. OverzealousAutocorrect (talk) 19:11, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mount Saint Helens
Talk:Gosu

message: Any proof (or evidence) that the term was used in gaming before StarCraft (and thus wasn't originally an acronym)?
: Any of Korean dictionaries will do that. :)  --Puzzlet Chung 07:20, 19 November 2005 (UTC)

message: This article looks really silly in its present form.  Any objections to splitting it? -- Visviva 08:18, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I support it. --Puzzlet Chung 04:11, 26 August 2005 (UTC)

text: Splitted. See pansori gosu. --Puzzlet Chung 07:55, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split
Talk:Aak

message: The Revised spelling doesn't seem very intelligent at all -- to not separate the two "a"s by spaces or hyphen.  In English, two a's in a row are usually simply one long "a," whereas clearly the word "aak" should be pronounced as two syllables:  "a-ak."  Badagnani 15:39, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revised spelling  
Wikipedia talk:WikiCrime

message: I would call the deliberate removal of good text "Wikitheft" instead of "Wikicrime". -- PFHLai 20:38, 2004 Aug 19 (UTC)
:Perhaps Wikitheft is a specific Wikicrime. But let's not dwell too much on the negative side of things. If this page is going to help develop Wikilove (and I think it might), it's going to be by making negative comments briefer, more concise, more dispassionate (I guess that means less passionate but somehow I like the other phrase better). Andrewa 16:30, 4 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Early chatter

message: I am posting to publicly recognize that I committed a wikicrime in the Colonel James Sabow article before it was blanked and rewritten.  My desire for wikijustice and my m:transwikian editing philosophy caused me to edit inappropriately in the hope of learning wikijustice by perpetrating its opposite.  Please accept my apologies. JPatrickBedell 19:51, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Confession of wikicrime in [[Col. Sabow]] case

message: Just merge this into WP:Glossary. This doesn't really serve any purpose as a separate page, and since most of it is rehash of other guidelines, it can just be compressed down into a 1-2 sentence definition, e.g. "Intentional commission of or a clear pattern of editing behavior that runs afoul of Wikpedia policies against vandalism, tendentious editing, disruptive editing, removal of properly sourced material against consensus, insertion of spam, self-aggrandizing claims, unverifiable claims, unsourced accusations about living people, ..." and just link to extant policies. — SMcCandlish   Talk⇒ ʕ(Õلō)ˀ  Contribs. 01:47, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree with merge rationale and not totally opposed to redirecting this to WP:Glossary, but I'm kinda siding with keeping this page as is for now, if nothing else than to serve as a navigational aid for new users. Considering this has a history that dates back to 2004 it's got some historical value as well, and although the term "WikiCrime" isn't really in common use on enwiki it has been in use for quite a while on other wikis. -- œ™ 08:52, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: The redirect Wikipedia:Wikicrime on wheels! has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Capsulecap (talk • contribs) 02:07, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Wikipedia:Wikicrime on wheels!]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Blackstreet

message: Yes for that is real madeleines! On No Dignity, it’s all about the times. My Paradise is catchy too! AdwenKnowItAll (talk) 01:47, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: The Band is known for auto-tuned vocals

message: ...the group disbanded and released Level II in 2003 (see 2003 in music).
:Hmmm. but you'll actually find it in 2002 in music. Which is right? --rbrwrˆ 20:45, 19 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:S.E.S.

message: Can someone make this into a disambig? Kokiri 11:25, 22 Aug 2004 (UTC)

message: I just merged this page, along with Ses, into SES, as per WP:NCDAB.  Jason A. Recliner (talk) 10:08, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, that link should be WP:DABNAME.  Jason A. Recliner (talk) 10:11, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Seo Taiji and Boys

message: His article needs some cleaning up. Anyone care to help me? I'm going to remove statements like -He will never again say that he will retire from music; it will just be a long hiatus if needed, but never a retirement.  
I'm sorry but that statement is laughable. You can tell it was written by a Fan Boy. I'm going to remove the unsourced fluff from this article.--BeckiGreen (talk) 18:41, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleaning up.
Talk:Kim Ki-duk

message: Previous content was copyvio from this page, inserted by an anon over a year ago. Kat Walsh (spill your mind?) 05:23, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio

message: In linking from an article such as List of South Korean films, does anyone have an idea how we differentiate between this Kim Ki-duk, and the director of Yongary? Dekkappai 18:49, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Two Kim Ki-duks
Talk:New Apocalyptics

message: John Gallen may be John Waller. Charles Matthews 21:34, 19 Aug 2004 (UTC)

message: This article drops some names, but completely fails to tell what this movement was about. It fails to mention, for instance, Dylan Thomas' own contempt for the movement, characterizing them as "intellectual muckpots leaning on a theory" — which, though not exactly complimentary, at least gives some information about them from the viewpoint of a leading poet of the day. rowley (talk) 17:34, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  But What Was It? 

message: The actor Leslie Phillips is linked from the list of 'Others'. His article shows no sign of poetry. Is the link correct (in which case the poetry could usefully be added to his article), or should it be unlinked? (None of those listed at Leslie Phillips (disambiguation) seem to be poets.) -- Verbarson  talkedits 12:18, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leslie Phillips
Talk:3200 Phaethon

message: Could this be an object launched from earth by a verneshot (recent theory
concerning mass extinctions)? -David L. Battle
: No. If Verneshots exist, they result in rocks with suborbital trajectories (i.e. the rocks are orbiting Earth and crashing bacxk again very soon afterward). Phaethon is not in orbit around the Earth, it's orbiting the Sun on its own independent path, millions of miles away from Earth. There's no way a volcano could fire a rock into that kind of orbit. The Singing Badger 22:07, 19 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Verneshot

message: *
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
--Stone (talk) 22:44, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: For this edit and commentary I need some further explanation, the corresponding wikipedia guide-lines, and maybe even an example to substantiate it. Please do so. Thank you. -- Rfassbind – talk  20:14, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: There's no policy or guideline either way regarding reference columns, as far as I'm aware, except for some users' preference for or against. Keep the columns, its not worth the headache. As for the issue I was referring to, columns coupled with infoboxes looks like http://i.imgur.com/od4C5hA.png. — Huntster (t @ c) 17:00, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

text: Hi , thanks for the comments. I think you are on the right track with moving refs to the  template. I absolutely prefer that method, though I'm usually hesitant to use it. I use a lovely little script from User:PleaseStand/References segregator that makes editing refs ridiculously easy, and assists in moving them to the LDR system. If you want, I'll handle that transition. If you're okay with  then I'll work with that (the reason I use them is that I use a code colouring script that breaks without the closing slash for some unknown reason). Also, don't ever think to sell yourself short; you do excellent work here. Conflicts occasionally arise, but that's why we talk them out and find useful solutions like this! — Huntster (t @ c) 07:28, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Used formats for wiki source code 

message: No mention of it being on the blue side? That it is blue is one of the unusual aspects of 3200 Phaethon. Some references (though here are a lot more, just grabbed the first 3 that didn't come from UR): • Astronomy • Newsweek • Fox— al-Shimoni (talk) 10:12, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blue 

message: A new paper shows it may be a sibling of the Geminids, rather than the parent:
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/PSJ/ac0d02
Suggest editing to show this. I would, but I'm on an unstable connection. :(
talk (talk) 02:33, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Geminids parent body update

message: And a paper proposing sodium may account for Phaethon's tail:
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/PSJ/ac0d02
Am I  to include references to this? JojoTNO (talk) 15:54, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sodium possibly accounts for Phaethon's tail
Talk:PictBridge

message: The PictBridge facilities would be welcomed by anyone with such a camera, a colour printer and a USB port on their computer.
I'd like to use something like that on my digital pictures stored within my computer to send them to my printer.
--217.146.127.25 23:20, 19 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Not possible; you would need to emulate a USB device, but PCs etc have only USB host ports & controllers. --Jkew 01:09, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is anyone doing a PictBridge emulation for Windows, Mac or Linux? 

message: Removal of the "open standard" claim from the opening paragraph:
* The applicability of that phrase to PictBridge is sufficiently disputed (see below) that it should not be part of the opening paragraph.
* The phrase "an industry standard from [CIPA]" already implies many of the ways in which PictBridge might be seen as an open standard.
Pjrm 12:41, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Various discussions related to PictBridge openness 

message: I removed text from the article because it seems to be copied from http://www.letsgodigital.org/en/news/articles/story_52.html. --Gia.cossa 19:19, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright violation

message: Msn kkhc!cu hey I fun he why c 2600:6C48:777F:939B:F4A6:EA0C:881E:687A (talk) 23:07, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mxsccnc
Talk:Troop

message: This article is still a stub.  Are there any plans to include the meanings from other countries, and a historical background? -- Allyunion 23:21, 19 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I've put in US usage (certainly open to correction), but historical background would still be nice. --Dhartung 17:42, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expand the article 

message: Needs more non-U.S. material. Check out this article at Grammar Girl's website since she has references that could be used. --Airborne84 (talk) 08:49, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs to adhere to [[Wikipedia:Systemic bias|WP:WORLDVIEW]] 

message: The lead refers to use in the Royal Horse Artillery to mean a battery (does it mean equivalent of a battery?) but this information is not included in the section on the British army lower down. In the Royal Artillery in WW2 a troop was a subunit of a battery, two or three to a battery and usually four guns; don't know if that is still the case. "Troop" now seems to be used as an historical honorific for a battery, eg N Battery (The Eagle Troop) Royal Horse Artillery Cyclopaedic (talk) 10:47, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  British artillery usage 

message: Hey, one question. This article does not mention the size of a Turkish troop. Could you guys please help me with figuring out if the Turks use squadrons and what the size is? Faithful15 (talk) 16:44, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Turkish Armored Troops
Talk:Transylvania in popular culture

message: Is there any good reason this shouldn't be part of Transylvania, the only page which links to it? Andy Mabbett 23:23, 19 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. --Apoc2400 21:52, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: earlier comments

message: "In animation:Transylvania is !'s residence.  This links to the article about the punctuation mark, while ! (disambiguation) does not mention any animated characters named "!".  Unless some context is given, this bullet point makes no sense.  Fishal (talk) 17:47, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "!"?
Talk:Hans Moravec

message: Todo: add information about Moravec transfer
Estocasticom: I don't speak enought english for do it, but someone should write in "popular cultere reference" about the issue 7 of the comic Transmetropolitan where they speake about human minds living in bush robot.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.32.7.135 (talk) 22:13, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: To do

message: Would anyone object to adding something like the following to the description of his Mind Children book?
Hans also outlined the neural substitution argument in this book, published 7 years before Chalmers published the same argument in his “Absent Qualia, Fading Qualia, Dancing Qualia” paper, which is often treated as the source of this argument.  While some may argue that correlation does not imply causation, it remains a fact that Chalmers used this argument in support of, and became famous for what he calls a “Hard problem of consciousness” while Hans was using this argument in this book in support of hard science in which there are no such ‘hard problems’.
Brent.Allsop (talk) 02:44, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I have been unable to verify your addition. Feel free to restore it with an appropriate citation. Daask (talk) 13:15, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proper Neural Substitution Argument Attribution 
Talk:Domain name

message: The section about the mistyped domain names has no sources. I apologize for worsening by adding a little more unsourced statements. I thought I could help by adding sources to the existing statements and maybe a little more. Here is one source: https://www.dummies.com/article/technology/programming-web-design/html5/how-to-avoid-common-mistakes-in-url-links-161123/ Cwater1 (talk) 22:06, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add sources about mistyped domain names section
Talk:Zone-tailed hawk

message: Sources so far: , , and personal observation.  —JerryFriedman 23:45, 19 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled