lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Houston Stewart Chamberlain

message: Direct citations and attributions should be left in the article especially if made by people at the time who knew Chamberlain and had significant knowledge of his writings. David Lauder 21:01, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: [HSC's letter] ...that the magnificent Ludendorff openly supports you and your movement. [Wiki] Chamberlain's letter—which made him into the first celebrity to endorse the NSDAP—caused a media sensation in Germany...
:His letter references Ludendorff. So Chamberlain could not have been the first celebrity to endorse the party. Valetude (talk) 22:22, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  First celebrity to support NSDAP 

message: HOW THE FUCK YOU WRITE THIS MANY WORDS AND NOT MENTION THAT HE THOUGHT HE WAS POSSESSED BY DEMONS. According to William L Shirer, The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich. I mean, just even mention it as mental illness yo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.129.222.101 (talk • contribs) 06:33, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: That is a very easy question. The answer is here: WP:RS. --Hob Gadling (talk) 07:51, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Excuse me 

message: This is an extremely thorough article that also repeats itself many times. There is also a high number of direct quotes from Chamberlain's writings in proportion to other articles about historical figures. I wonder if it could be edited to be more concise. Asiaperdue (talk) 15:35, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: My thoughts are that anyone looking up Chamberlain is going to want to have all of this information. Daydreamdays2 (talk) 01:25, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too detailed 

message: I updated the main paragraph referencing Bethmann Hollweg & annexations to remove some significant exaggerations and factual misstatements: 1) The Septermberprogramme's aims did not even come close to "annexing much of Europe and Africa"; the much more modest goals are laid out in the document cited in the footnote; 2) There was nothing resembling a military coup in 1916, just significantly more influence on the military's part. The reference I cited to Bethmann refusing to endorse the generals' annexation demands at Kreuznach is one proof of their (non-dictatorial) limitations; 3) The Reichstag Peace Resolution was not a response to Bethmann Hollweg being forced to resign. It had been in work before then; see the Bethmann Hollweg article, last paragraph of "Prussian electoral law reform"; 4) I reluctantly removed "the Chancellor and" from the Field p. 388 citation because it makes no sense in the temporal context. Where the quote is used, the chancellor is the new one, so there is no reason why the military would be at war with him.
Anyone have any objections to the update?  GHStPaulMN (talk) 02:45, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bethmann Hollweg 

message: Is he a Hue-sten or a How-sten? 99.228.43.228 (talk) 22:15, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation
Talk:Nalmefene

message: The article mentions the ketone of naloxone being replaced with a methylene for greater binding affinity but kind of implies that's the only substitution (though it doesn't say it out right). There's clearly a difference between a cyclopropane and propene substituent as well, hanging off the Nitrogen. What's the significance of this? Should this be made clearer in the text comparing the two drugs (at least to mention the additional difference). 88.145.11.241 (talk) 01:26, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cyclopropane vs propene as well 
Talk:Howard Caine

message: I haven't compared every sentence word-for-word but it appears that this article was cut and pasted from imdb.com. Rsduhamel (talk) 17:53, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible copyright violation.

message: The article talks about Howard Caine, but in the second paragraph he's called Cohen. Typo or name change?
Tschüss! CQuake (talk) 17:05, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Caine or Cohen?

message: Would it kill someone to put a picture of Howard in the article? If I knew how, and had the time I would. Do we have to Google for every picture when one can be uploaded to WP? 2602:306:320A:AF0:25E7:62B2:79B9:7913 (talk) 04:27, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Done -NowIsntItTime(chats)(doings) 05:09, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo?
Talk:Howard Chandler Christy

message: Please use the holdings of the Pritzker Military Museum & Library to improve this article. TeriEmbrey (talk) 19:24, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: PMML holdings

message: I've removed for the second time a superlative that represents unsourced opinion. Christy was undoubtedly popular as a portrait painter in the 1920s, but is there a robust consensus of scholarly sources that would justify calling him the most popular? By what metric—international renown, or number of commissions, or sales prices—is his popularity being measured against that of contemporaries such as Philip de László, Kees van Dongen, Gerald Kelly, Moise Kisling, Tamara de Lempicka, Jacques Emile Blanche, Eugene Speicher, Augustus John, etc.? Ewulp (talk) 00:33, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Most
Talk:Hydroxocobalamin

message: Regarding "Commercially it is made using one of a number of different types of bacteria."
And the comment "only one? which one? and never by any other types? is there a source that says exactly this: i.e. it's a *unique* type of bacteria it's being made by?"
Have you read the source? What do you think it supports than? In my opinion it is clear. This stuff is made by bacteria. A few types of bacteria can be used. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 01:35, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Wording
Talk:Howard I. Chapelle

message: This article should be under "Howard Chapelle", which is what people call him.  I propose renaming it.--Doug.(talk • contribs) 03:03, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Common Name 

message: I only noticed this page when I made a reference to Phil Bolger's passing (today) on Bolger's biographical talk page.  I do not think that Chapelle's importance as a historian and educator of the American sailing Renaissance can be overstated.  His designs distilled the essence of the meaning of American traditional sail.
The idea that the ships and other vessels he documented, or designed, are outdated and old-fashioned, and hence insignificant, ignores the fact that far more science was applied to merchant and inshore design during his period than since.  Added to this is that the architecture of his period was also art--a concept so lost to engineering today that it seems radical.  But it isn't; it is conservative in the truest sense.--John Bessa (talk) 22:28, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chapelle's Importance
Talk:Stargate School

message: just gave this article a major overhaul and added headers and references. i will continue cleaning up this article.76.25.49.63 (talk) 23:08, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  gave this article a major overhaul 

message: I am pretty sure that the application process is affected by gender. Now Stargate is not sexist, but they want to maintain a balance between boys and girls. Should this be added? 76.25.49.63 (talk) 19:57, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Gender? 

message: Hey there, my name is **** **** and I am a student at Stargate. After searching online for the school, I noticed that there was a wikipedia page. When I read the page I noticed that there was a lack of information and the article was basically a stub. The information present is information that anyone could find by doing a simple search. Therefore, I made it my mission to update the page with the necessary information and I've decided to expand it to include information that only a student/parent/staff member would know. This will be a process, but I will continue chipping away at it through the school year. I plan to add a section that describes the curriculum and the "adroit" program, and I have a few more ideas for sections such as a sports/clubs section, awards and recognitions section, and a student body section. Throughout the year, I will expand the summary section and keep all the information in the article up to date and relevant. It seems like I may be the only active editor on here, but if anyone else has questions and ideas please email me. Also, feel free to update the article yourself with anything that I've missed. 
--Colorado Legend (talk) 14:42, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Overhaul
Talk:Nicomorphine

message: A lot of this one is written mostly ok, but there are some oddnesses (enhanced "bang"?), namely lack of medical / pharmaceutical citations, so I added a few.  I'm having trouble finding a good overview of the pharmacokinetics of this one via oral route if anyone else can get some eyes on it, not too much information easily searchable here.  They Terk Err Jerbs (talk) 03:16, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pharmacology and Sourcing
Talk:Acetyldihydrocodeine

message: The structure currently depicted has one undefined stereocentre - (technically because of the ring system, the configuration is set by stereocentre in another part of the molecule). I've updated the InChI and CSID etc, can someone update the image? --The chemistds (talk) 10:26, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Structure needs correcting
Talk:Diacetyldihydromorphine

message: I'm sorry but there are some mistakes in this article. I'm going to keep it short as much as possible:
'Diacetyldihydromorphine (...) as a more potent form of diamorphine (Heroin).'
'diacetyldihydromorphine is actually less potent than diamorphine'
'Paralaudin is fast acting and longer lasting than diamorphine'
'perhaps because it is metabolised more slowly'
The second example might be a bit off as it is written that it is fast acting, not faster than heroin. Anyway check out the first one. I'm not going to edit this article because it is a complete mess at some points. Someone wrote it while on heroin? Just a joke.
Tripleffect (talk) 03:00, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Just of note, the second example isn't contradicting whatsoever, if that is the point you clarify at your amendment below or not is unclear to me. Yet speed of onset needn't mean how quickly metabolized into inactive constituents, or how quickly 'offset'. Nagelfar (talk) 06:39, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Misinformation

message: Is it really necessary to put "(heroin)" after every mention of diamorphine? I personally found it to be distracting and annoying, it steals from the main idea. In the real world of academic/scientific/scholarly articles, you only have to do that once... Seems like one editor was a little overzealous? Anyway, I won't speculate, but I don't feel it's necessary to "clarify" that 4 separate times in an article that's scarcely 2 paragraphs long. Taking out all of the parenthetical asides except the first.
72.128.67.81 (talk) 16:39, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Really Necessary?

message: As was pointed out above: the article contains a contradiction in that it claims that diacetyldihydromorphine is both more potent and less potent than diamorphine. Both statements appear to be referenced, so the issue might be the precise interpretation of "potent". AxelBoldt (talk) 14:23, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction
Talk:Howard Pyle

message: I removed this:
: In the chapter, "Robin Hood and the Tinker", Pyle mentions King Harry, a king who was greatly separated, historically, from the era in which Robin Hood lived. King John was the King of Robin Hood's era, reigning in the absence of Richard the Lionheart, who was absent from England, fighting in The Crusades.
I haven't checked who Pyle mentions as king, but otherwise, this is pretty much wrong from beginning to end.  Niether Henry II nor Henry III is much separated from Richard and John; the first is their father and Richard's predecessor, while the second is John's son and successor (although this would be after Robin's outlawry ended).  Also, John was not king when Robin was an outlaw (if, as stated elsewhere, Robin made peace with John's predecessor Richard), since he claimed only the title of Regent while his brother Richard was alive.  That said, it is correct (however irrelevant now) that Richard was absent in the Third Crusade.
Now, if Pyle mentioned King *Edward*, that *would* be farther removed from Richard and John; and he might well have done so, since the earliest Robin Hood stories to mention a king mention Edward (either Henry III's son and successor Edward I, Edward I's son and successor Edward II, or Edward II's son and successor Edward III).  Without a text of Pyle to check, I've removed the whole thing.
—Toby Bartels (talk) 09:09, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  King Harry 
Talk:Acetylmorphone

message: Wouldn't an acetylated variant of Oxymorphone be an acetylated morphone too and thus share the name as it is exactly? Is there a reason that the name is not consequently ambiguous as I notice (Oxymorphone cannot be acetylated possibly?) I only wonder if Acetylmorphone of this type is infact more properly named Acetohydromorphone. Nagelfar (talk) 04:22, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: The Article Name
Talk:Howard Swearer

message: An episode of the Today Show featured UMich (large Midwest school) and Brown (small Northeast school). Bryant Gumbel broadcast from Michigan, while Jane Pauley covered Brown. At one point, Gumbel listed off a bunch of Michigan alums. Pauley, who hadn't prepared her own list, asked Swearer for some notable Brown people. Swearer settled back in his chair, smiled sweetly, and said, "We prefer not to brag." 130.111.39.47 (talk) 20:17, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Swearer on Today Show
Talk:5-Me-MiPT

message: Most importantly, the previous title, 5,N-Dimethyl-N-isopropyltryptamine does not follow Wikipedia's Concision guidelines (it is longer than necessary "to identify the topic to a person familiar with the general subject area".
In addition, it does not follow the following guidelines from the top five article title guidelines:
* Recognizability: those who are not experts in the field may recognize 5-Me-MiPT but not 5,N-Dimethyl-N-isopropyltryptamine
* Naturalness: people will search for 5-Me-MiPT, not 5,N-Dimethyl-N-isopropyltryptamine
* Consistency: by and large articles for substituted tryptamines (4-AcO-DMT, 4-AcO-DPT, etc.) use the new format, not full IUPAC chemical names.
I will be going through the Cleaning up after a move checklist in the coming days. Thanks! Repylom (talk) 01:00, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title change
Talk:Howard Spring

message: Sampson's Circus (Faber and Faber, 1936)(rare bookseller says novel  was Commended runnerup for the inaugural Carnegie Medal. Now this article includes a longer statement with a reference.
The reference does not identify commended author Howard Spring except by name. The U.S. and German national libraries (External links) do not catalog this book by Howard Spring, 1889-1965. WorldCat (Ext links) does catalog this book by the same author as others covered in this article.
This is all I know about Spring's contribution to children's literature. --P64 (talk) 16:27, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Children's literature 

message: All of the mentioned titles are in English. The article should say that he wrote exclusively in English, if true. Given the Wales and Cornwall mentions, descriptions, categories we should probably say whether he was a speaker or reader of Welsh or Cornish, too. --P64 (talk) 20:58, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  English-language 

message: H. V. Morton says that he and Howard Spring sailed to Placentia Bay to witness Churchill meet with Roosevelt to forge the  Atlantic Charter.
Did Spring ever write about this voyage? Morton certainly did.
Morton also said Spring was 'living aboard a yacht' or houseboat or some-such during that period, 1941.
Anybody ?2001:44B8:3102:BB00:400D:E9EC:5CAE:6AFB (talk) 04:50, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Placentia Bay
Talk:Desoxypipradrol

message: It would not fall under the analog act in the United States as pipradrol is schedule IV and the analog act only applies to drugs similar to schedule I and II drugs. I don't know about Australia's or New Zealand's analog laws so I just took "the USA" out of that sentence.
:Wouldn't it still fall under the Federal Analogue Act according to "(ii) which has a stimulant, depressant, or hallucinogenic effect on the central nervous system that is substantially similar to or greater than the stimulant, depressant, or hallucinogenic effect on the central nervous system of a controlled substance in schedule I or II"?--Astavats (talk) 21:51, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: From what I understand, the courts have consistently interpreted the act to require subparagraph i to apply in addition to subparagraph ii. Subparagraph i requires a substance to have a substantially similar chemical structure to a schedule-I-or-II drug to be considered a "controlled substance analogue". The closest chemical structure to desoxypipradrol in schedule I or II is methylphenidate, which is missing an entire carbon ring compared with desoxypipradrol. Since "substantially similar chemical structure" is not defined by the act and is a rather vague, subjective notion (in the opinions of some legal scholars - unconstitutionally vague), and since the case law regarding this act is relatively sparse, it could be debatable whether this substance is an illegal analogue or not. In any case, it's true that its much more clear similarity to pipradrol cannot be used as a basis for considering it illegal in the United States.MattTweedell (talk) 20:26, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not Illegal Under USA Analog Act 

message: There's absolutely no references and it's hard to really find much on it.  This sounds a lot like someone speculating with a ton of original research.  The use for ADHD is probably reasonable enough to stay, but I honestly think both those paragraphs should be gone.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Verdafolio (talk • contribs) 18:35, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recreational Drug 

message: I reverted all of this. It was poorly written, unreferenced and contained a lot of opinion and original research.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Testem (talk • contribs) 12:54, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reversion from  76.220.9.234's edits
Talk:Parahexyl

message: Please use the references template. It looks better, you get DOI or pubmed links and it is even faster ;)
Just get the pubmed ID, then copy&paste it here
http://diberri.dyndns.org/wikipedia/templates/
and done!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Panoramix303 (talk • contribs) 14:35, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:The Tokyo Zodiac Murders

message: I think there  is a fault in the plot description
Should not this passage: 'which he will do by cutting his 2 daughters, 2 of his 3 stepdaughters and his 2 nieces up'
actually read something like:
which he will do by cutting up: one of his 2 daughters; all 3 of his stepdaughters; and his 2 nieces' 
You have the plot say that one of the painter's stepdaughters gets to live because his daughter is not a virgin.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.219.18.82 (talk) 11:08, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Anacronyism

message: This word is mainly a typo. 
If not it's a neologism.
  
If it existed it would be better defined as "a friend who you've known for a long time, and still hang around with, but can't remember why". Or something.
pablo ::  ... hablo ... 19:58, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know where he came up with the spelling that he did, but his description matches that of backronym, and Wikipedia is not a dictionary anyway. So we agree that the article should be deleted. Is there something you don't agree on? Leebo T/C 20:00, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Nitazoxanide

message: Did the drug company write this entry? An "impressive series of controlled trials"? Pleease.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Walker.andrew (talk • contribs) 12:01, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

message: I'm working to improve this page, as it is still under need of a lot of improvment. There is a lot of information about clinical trials that have ended, some recently. If anyone wants to help clain up the clinical trials that would be a lot of help. There are several statements that are not well sourced. I'm not sure I can handle all of this myself but I will be doing what I can.Hardkhora (talk) 19:40, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improvements 

message: An editor tried to jam the citation into the reflist section, I kludged it into the proper place, but I'm not exceptionally good at entering citations. Anyone want to help clean that up? Thanks.Wzrd1 (talk) 16:45, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fixed an incorrectly entered reference 

message: I noticed that in 2016, the claim that nitazoxanide is a "broad-spectrum antiviral" was added. What's the current status of this drug? Based on a limited search, it appears that nitazoxanide may show in vitro activity but is still considered experimental in humans for diseases caused by viruses. Shouldn't there be some clarification of the "broad-spectrum antiviral" claim? ScienceFlyer (talk) 19:47, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The publication supporting the claim that nitazoxanide is a "broad-spectrum antiviral" is authored by an employee of the same company developing the drug as an anti-viral. The conflict of interest doesn't necessarily invalidate the reference, but I think it's worth noting. ScienceFlyer (talk) 20:36, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Antiviral?
Talk:Eticyclidine

message: Can anybody explain what the deal is with wiki-editors choosing super obscure names as the heading for a chemical compound. They did that same thing with 4-AcO-DMT by calling it O-acetylpsilocin, I understand both are correct but O-acetylpsilocin is about 500x less common. The same goes for eticyclidine...that names occurs about twice in scientific literature, as opposed to "PCE" which is the common recognized name for the compound. I vote the name be changed to PCE.Valerophenone (talk) 22:51, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Name
Talk:Insulin glulisine

message: The topic is marked as needing an expert in pharmacology. While this would be ideal, the main issue is that the article is only a stub. A knowledgeable non-expert could improve it greatly. (I could do it but unfortunately I don't have time.) Paleolith (talk) 20:53, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  really need an expert?
Talk:Frodo Lives!

message: It's a cute little memory, but not encyclopedic material. I don't think it even deserves to be merged into :Tolkien fandom. --Orange Mike 20:02, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems OK to me. It is informative for readers and is now well referenced. Carcharoth 12:58, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Not notable
Talk:Hydroxyprogesterone caproate

message: FDA expert advisory committee voted 14-1 to recommend withdrawing accelerated marketing approval because required post-approval studies did not confirm efficacy.  https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2022/10/19/makena-preterm-birth-fda-advisers-black-women Fhobbs (talk) 19:28, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Efficacy in Doubt
Talk:Mepyramine

message: I wonder why this isn't a good sleep aid. It seems the half life is very low in animal models? Danski14(talk) 12:58, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Half life? 

message: Not sure how this article rates as high importance, as mepyramine has been rarely used over the past 25 years or more.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.209.49.58 (talk) 07:27, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's in Midol. Recalcitrancy (talk) 16:48, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Importance
Talk:2C-B-BZP

message: Where did the 2C-B-BZP nomenclature come from? 2C specifically refers to the two-carbon chain adjacent to the amine. Despite this compound's superficial resemblance to 2C-B on the phenyl side, this is strictly not a 2C compound. --24.0.124.181 (talk) 04:18, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: Good theory Anil yadav IAS student (talk) 19:13, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bio