Talk:King's Sedgemoor Drain

message: I have reduced the length from 12.5 to 10.5 miles. Otter quotes 12.5, while Skempton quotes 10.5 (8 + 2.5 through clay). Measuring the OS map suggests Skempton is right. Bob1960evens (talk) 15:02, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Length of Drain

message: Is the Eel-pass mentioned in the article the same as a Eel ladder?— Rod talk 19:48, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Also should it be glass eel or glasseel - looking at Eel life history I think it should be the later (but both are used in the article) - but a quick explanation about not being a separate species & probably European eels might be helpful.— Rod talk 19:55, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure of the details of an eel ladder, but there is a picture of the eel-pass on the BBC Somerset ref, if that would help you to judge. Bob1960evens (talk) 21:56, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eel pass 

message: Would anyone mind if we remove the mention of Brue Drainage Act? The acticle originally suggested the drain was authorised by that Act, but it wasn't. I left it in, but it seems a bit irrelevant. Bob1960evens (talk) 22:32, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: If its not relevant then I would agree it shouldn't be in there.— Rod talk 07:52, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Brue Drainage Act

message: I was just wondering why the info about the RSPB reserve & the birds to be seen wasn't in the wildlife section?— Rod talk 08:55, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Good thinking. I put it in course, since the reserve is not actually part of the Drain, whereas the eel pass and fish were, but it makes sense to move it.Bob1960evens (talk) 23:05, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  RSPB 

message: Assessed as C and low importance for WP:WikiProject Rivers.  Could benefit from expanding into structure as suggested at project page, although some sections may not fit as this is an artificial waterway. Jezhotwells (talk) 18:35, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It is difficult to see how most of the structure suggested by WikiProject Rivers would be relevant in this instance. Bob1960evens (talk) 17:20, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on King's Sedgemoor Drain. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111001084328/http://www.maygurney.co.uk/docs/newsletters/12-1.pdf to http://www.maygurney.co.uk/docs/newsletters/12-1.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110903071909/http://www.ada.org.uk/documents/CM08_ACE.pdf to http://www.ada.org.uk/documents/CM08_ACE.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090319222658/http://publications.environment-agency.gov.uk/pdf/G3-02-BGNW-e-e.pdf to http://publications.environment-agency.gov.uk/pdf/G3-02-BGNW-e-e.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:47, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified