lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:One-inch punch

message: "The One Inch Punch is immortalized as an ability of one of King of Fighters main characters, K' and Kula Diamond."  I wouldn't say a video game 95% of people have never heard of, immortalized the one inch punch. That's a bit far fetched.
:KOF was actually the number-two most popular franchise of fighting games for a good long while, second only to Street Fighter- it's just that its popularity was mostly confined to Europe. -Toptomcat 15:54, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hyperbole 

message: "As with most Chinese martial arts, the power for this attack comes from the Dan tian. The dan tian is an area about three inches below the navel from which all power derives"
This doesn't sound very scientific. It should probably be either removed or reworded. (It is claimed that.. etc) Debolaz 19:28, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Given to understand that the dan tian is the centre of mass? Therefore this seems logical to me. Leushenko (talk) 01:27, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dan tian? 

message: Jing4 (勁, Chinese for "power") must not be confused with the Taoist concept of Jing1 (精, Chinese for "essence"). They are too different words in pronounciation, writing and meaning. Thus, "emit essence" has nothing to do with fa jing. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 161.148.141.250 (talk) 18:41, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jing Confusion 

message: What's the point of this huge list of games that have some sort of 1" punch? I think no-one reading the article is really interested in this. Something along the lines of "Many fighting games incorporate the 1" punch as a move, like game1, game2,game3" is enough to convince that the punch is popular. Anything more is just not pointless. - SuperMidget (talk) 12:46, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove list of games 

message: IN a fighting game called "Touhou 12.3 Hisoutensoku" there is a character called Hong Meiling who uses an attack ressemblant to the One Inch Puch called "Scarlet Inch Crush" reference can be found in this page http://hisouten.koumakan.jp/wiki/Hong_Meiling section "Special moves: Alternative skill cards".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.6.185.47 (talk) 01:42, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  New videogame reference 

message: based on bruce lee legend, The upcoming movie; The green hornet (2011 flim) features kato. A heavily inspired by bruce lee technique. One inch punch will be in the film.--216.237.22.181 (talk) 22:36, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  new movie 

message: Pound force conversions are listed in kilograms, a unit of mass. They should either be changed to kilogram-force (kgf) or converted to newtons.
--Xavienth (talk) 04:00, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kilogram Force
Talk:Chitra

message: There have been a number of attempts to add mention of this artist to this page.  As I read Wikipedia:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages), this person should be mentioned here only if there is, or could be, an article (per WP:N).  A past article was deleted.  If this was a bad decision, it should be challenged by offering sources and turning them into an article, not by just inserting poorly formatted mentions of the name into a disambiguation page.  (If someone needs a place to work on the article while assembling the sources, a draft article can be placed as a sub-page of a User page, for example User:foo/Ramanathan). Kingdon 13:30, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chitra Ramanathan
Talk:Dan in Real Life

message: Thought you may be interested: Steve Carrell Dan in Real Life Interview. I work for ReelzChannel, and don't want to break the editorial guidlines.
IYou have an interesting career.  I condensed the plot description per invitation.Lynxx2 (talk) 07:42, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Steve Carrell Dan in Real Life Interview
Talk:Deal of the Century (draft plan)

message: Hi, Can I ask you to do copy edit of the article? Thanks a lot. Saff V. (talk) 05:57, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy edit 

message: ;Problem 1:
The article fails to state what the subject actually is. I don't know what it is so I don't want to draft something myself.
;Problem 2:
The current lead (probably unintentionally) implies that action by the US government can unilaterally effect a resolution to the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. That's just plain incorrect. How may times has the US Government tried and failed? Even with a perfect plan there is no reason to be confident that it could bridge the gap between the incompatible aspirations of both sides. (Readers can decide for themselves how confident they are that the current USA administration can come up with a perfect plan. That isn't really the problem though.)
;Problem 3:
The article is self-contradictory. It says that the plan (or whatever it is) is "being drafted" but it also says that it has already been sent out and that various people have already commented on it as if it were fully drafted. 
;Proposed solution to problems 1 and 2:
Change:
:"The Deal of the Century is currently being drafted by the US administration to resolve the Israeli–Palestinian conflict."
To something of the form:
:"The Deal of the Century is an insert description here intended to resolve the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. It is currently being drafted by the US administration"
The description needs to be something more specific than a vague description like "deal", "plan" or "proposal" (although those words are OK if used as part of a more complete description). I also think the word "intended" needs to be in there, although "proposed" might be a valid alternative. Without it, it implies that it is within the power of the USA to effect a resolution unilaterally. 
Problem 3 can be solved by rewriting the text to remove the apparent self-contradiction.
--DanielRigal (talk) 16:32, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for your attention and attention. I really appreciate you for nominating to issues and suggest the solution for them. As you said, the third one would be done by copy edit, but about the first two problems: I rewrote the lead. Please say your opinion. Also, I have searched. In result, You are right, it is a draft but anywhere the word of the draft has not been used. The proposal is more common.Saff V. (talk) 11:27, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Basic article failings
Talk:Dear Brigitte

message: It may be noted that, in the film's opening credits, 14 cast members are listed. Below is a reproduction of the form in which the cast is indicated:
   20thCENTURYF   O   X
TWENTIETH CENTURY – FOX                     PRESENTS                     A         CINEMASCOPE              PICTURE
James Stewart in
Dear Brigitte
A Fred Kohlmar Production
co – starringFabianGlynis Johns
Cindy / BillyCarol / Mumy
John WilliamsJack Kruschen
withCharles RobinsonHoward FreemanJane WaldAlice PearceJesse WhiteGene O'Donnell
  Ed Wynnss The Captain
The on-screen closing credits, however, list the names of five additional cast members, for a total of 19 billed performers. Below is a reproduction of the form in which the cast is depicted in the closing credits crawl:
         Cast of Characters
Professor Leaf..JAMES STEWARTKenneth............FABIANVina.........GLYNIS JOHNSPandora.......CINDY CAROLErasmus........BILLY MUMYUpjohn......JOHN WILLIAMSDr. Volker....JACK KRUSCHENGeorge....CHARLES ROBINSONDean Sawyer..HOWARD FREEMANTerry...........JANE WALDUnemployment Clerk.ALICE PEARCEArgyle........JESSE WHITELt. Rink....GENE O'DONNELLVon Schlogg..ORVILLE SHERMANSchool Teacher...MAIDA SEVERNBank Manager...PITT HERBERTSaleslady.....ADAIR JAMESONTaxi Driver.MARCEL DE LA BROSSE                      and                ED WYNN                       as               The Captain
                                                                            Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 08:59, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Cast listing in the closing credits adds five names to those listed in the opening credits
Talk:Box set

message: Many other things can be reffered to as a boxed set outside  "musical recordings, films, & television programs", such as boxed sets of games, toys, tools, etc.... Mathmo 06:39, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Nonmedia

message: This is really a "foo is bar" article ("a box set is a set in a box"). I'm tempted to nominate it for deletion but I know it would be kept. Perhaps somebody could make it less of a dictionary definition and actually tell us something interesting? To this end, I will tag with . --kingboyk 16:52, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: How about some history regarding the creation and marketing of box sets. Presumably they started with classical music and then baby-boomer genres. Hyacinth 22:55, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

text: "foo is bar"?? W guice 14:37, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's more "foobar is a bar of foo". boffy_b 15:46, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion

message: I request changing the spellig "theatre" to "theater" as well as changing "film" to "movies" in the title of section 3,"Television and film", because if you read further downh that section it does say "an 18-disc DVD box set of Shirley Temple movies" and not "an 18-disc DVD box set of Shirley Temple films" --Fandelasketchup (talk) 14:57, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling change request
Talk:Sai Ying Pun Community Complex

message: If this one is to be deleted because of not notable, many entities will be deleted.
This is one of very important historic landmark in Hong Kong.
It is famous in the city as it is considered as High Street Ghost House.
It also reflects how Government ignors the preservation of Heritage building.
Shrimp wong 06:44, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the tag.  The subject seems notable to me. Isomorphic 08:19, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Remove the tag
Talk:Dentist in the Chair

message: ...and I quote: "Several times that the film has been available on VHS and DVD have all been cut to 76 minutes, this has since been unknown why this is to be."
...call me pedantic, but I think the grammar used here (possibly even the SEMANTICS...) might need a bit of a tidy-up.
I'd do it myself, but I honestly don't know what the author is trying to get across...
82.5.68.95 (talk) 02:49, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Errrrr....what....?
Talk:Derek and Clive Get the Horn

message: I am an Australian. I am also a Pete & Dud fan. However, much as I would like to claim this film as Australian, it is fairly demonstrably not - despite the nationality of the director (American Beauty is not a British film, for example). Can we remove this from the Australian cinema group? 91.109.244.252 (talk) 17:27, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Australian" film??
Talk:Dirty Deeds (2005 film)

message: The link for the person who plays Kyle 'Wes Robinson' takes you to a page for an Australian cricket player who shares the same name but is not the same person.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.18.196.233 (talk) 02:53, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong link for Wes Robinson
Talk:Dunford Bridge

message: Displayed image size
In articles, if you wish to have a photo beside the text, you should generally use the "thumbnail" option available in the "Image markup", or approximately 200-250 pixels of width if you're doing it manually. Larger images should generally be a maximum of 550 pixels wide, so that they can comfortably be displayed on 800x600 monitors. 82.30.73.87 08:23, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll leave it as your 400 pixel image, 'cos it doesn't really seem worth arguing about, but I do dislike huge images dominating articles, particularly as if the size isn't forced, users can use their preferences to select the size they would like. Warofdreams talk 23:17, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Divorcing Jack (film)

message: I'm far too drunk to read all of this! :)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.238.188.55 (talk) 00:21, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot section too long?
Talk:Doc Hollywood

message: How can this movie be set in South Carolina and Georgia? I realize they are close to each other, but the article mentions Georgia State and then says it's set in South Carolina in the "Trivia" section. I'm watching the movie now to verify, but the article needs to specify with a resource/citation. TV Guide says it takes place in S.C. regardless if it was filmed in GA or Florida. Needs clarity, the article contradicts. Thanks! 63.131.4.149 (talk) 01:19, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: ?

message: Earlier today, I created a short section dealing with the claim that the plot of the film Cars was copied from Doc Hollywood.  The point is made in the quote from The Guardian article and we do not need to belabour the point with a lot of verbiage and a slew of references, most of which are to unreliable sources.  The point is made, and it is a minor point at that. ---The Old JacobiteThe '45 03:13, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The article does not need all the bloat you added, nor does it need 15 sources for this very minor story.  It is also ridiculous of you to fill half this page with your long, rambling response. ---The Old JacobiteThe '45 01:47, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Two points, and I will try to keep it short: the plagiarism aspect does not belong in the lede of this article because it is about Doc Hollywood, not Cars. Secondly, we don't need a dozen cites from second-rate sources as per WP:OVERCITE; however, a second citation to corroborate the claim wouldn't hurt (I recommend the Total Film reference since it is a respected film magazine) since it is a strong allegation. Betty Logan (talk) 02:18, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur - apparently, so does Karl. (Came here from WT:WPFILM) --Lexein (talk) 18:26, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cars plagiarism 

message: I think a small mention of Michael J Fox showing signs of parkinson's disease, in the production section of thie article would be good. Given the fact he's the lead actor of this film, as well as it being an event that majorly shaped his career, and heck even the future of parkinson's disease, I think a small mention is warranted. 97.84.86.83 (talk) 07:40, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mention of Michael J Fox developing parkinson's disease
Talk:Jeff McCarthy

message: An anonymous editor (IP 24.5.230.51) recently added this:
:Jeff just happens to be 66 years old and is a mediocre, but very patient, basketball coach.
A few minutes later, an anonymous AOL user (IP 205.188.116.203) changed it to this:
:Jeff just happens to be like 66 years old and is a very patient, focused basketball coach for youngsters.
I've removed it, for several reasons:
*It's uncited. If Jeff McCarthy coaches basketball, we should have a citation to verify it.  Same for his age.
*Whether he's "mediocre", "patient" or "focused" are all statements of opinion, and as such should be either avoided or cited (e.g. "The Amateur Basketball Coach Review called McCarthy "very patient and focused"," or something like that, if it's really notable.
*It's unencyclopedic in style.  If we can find a citation for McCarthy's age, the Manual of Style says that it's better to list his birthdate than his age (so that it doesn't need to be constantly updated).  So if he is 66, the article should begin Jeff McCarthy (born 1940) is an American character actor..."
Please note that if we can find a citation for either his birthdate or him being a basketball coach, these facts can be added to the article; but they shouldn't be added without citation.  Thanks! —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 07:09, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Age and basketball
Talk:Indigenous peoples in the United States

message: Isn't this redundant, given the article on Native Americans in the United States?
Yeah, a redirect wouldn't be out of the question.  In any case, this section - The Native Americans faced numerous instances of hardship at the time of the American colonization. They were outnumbered and had less technology than the invading Europeans; they were hunted down and killed. They were forced into reservations and much of their culture and history was lost. - while not entirely inaccurate, seriously violates nPoV... even if the page isn't set to redirect, that needs to be changed. Hossenfeffer 01:30, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Its not a duplicate topic, the US has more than one indigenous population, Native Hawaiians (and some other Pacific Islander Americans) as well as Alaska Natives.★Trekker (talk) 00:54, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Regional and national music/Assessment

message: I added the importance tag to the assessment template.  See for example Talk:Music of the Vatican City, which is currently the only one tagged (I'm assuming that's low).  I thought it would be worthwhile to discuss how to decide that.
The most controversial ones will probably be the "top importance" articles, so I am brainstorming a list of the probable "top" articles.
#African American music
#Andean music
#Arab music
#Music of Argentina
#Music of Australia
#Music of Austria
#Music of Brazil
#Music of Canada
#Caribbean music
#Music of Central America
#Music of Central Asia
#Music of China
#Christian music
#Music of Colombia
#Music of the Democratic Republic of the Congo
#Music of Cote d'Ivoire
#Music of Cuba
#Music of the Dominican Republic
#Music of Eastern Europe
#Music of Egypt
#Music of Finland
#Music of France
#Music of Germany
#Music of Ghana
#Music of Greece
#Music of Haiti
#Music of Hawaii
#Music of India
#Music of Indonesia
#Music of Iran
#Music of Iraq
#Music of Ireland
#Music of Israel
#Music of Italy
#Music of Jamaica
#Music of Japan
#Jewish music
#Music of Kenya
#Korean music
#Music of Latin America
#Music of Louisiana
#Music of Malaysia
#Music of Martinique
#Music of Mexico
#Music of Morocco
#Muslim music
#Music of Nashville
#Native American music
#Music of the Netherlands
#Music of New York City
#Music of New Zealand
#Music of Nigeria
#Music of North Africa
#Music of Pakistan
#Persian music
#Music of the Philippines
#Music of Poland
#Music of Polynesia
#Music of Portugal
#Music of Puerto Rico
#Roma music
#Music of Russia
#Music of Scotland
#Music of Senegal
#Music of Spain
#Music of South Africa
#Music of Sweden
#Music of Taiwan
#Music of Tanzania
#Music of Trinidad and Tobago
#Music of Turkey
#Music of the United Kingdom
#Music of the United States
(Different guy here, the above wasn't signed) OK I'm going to try assessing a lot... it's not an exact science but IMO Supranational and the "most important" genres and countries should be top, most of the remainder countries and genres should be high, small countries, regions like US states, and genres should be mid, the rest of the stuff (for example cities, Monaco, etc) should be low. If someone wants to tweak it, go ahead.
PhnomPencil (talk) 06:01, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importance
Talk:Roy Cazaly

message: He also possessed the capacity to kick a football over 65 metres. - Naturally, Roy would be able to do this, being Australian and all, but some people might want a reference for these claims
This article says that "Up there Cazaly" was used as a battle cry for World War II - but he debuted in 1911, and therefore it is not entirely out of the question that it was also used  as a battle cry in World War I (which seems to ring truer for me) - does anyone know for sure one way or the other?   ρ¡ρρµ δ→θ∑ - (waarom? jus'b'coz!) 07:19, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

message: The claim that he won Champion Of The Colony award is disputed as there is no evidence that such an award was ever given to Victorian footballers.
RossRSmith (talk) 12:26, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Football
Talk:The Delicious Dish

message: I think this sketch is a parody of cooking shows. According to whom is it parody of public radio in general? -Will Beback 07:24, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the official magazine of public radio, Current. See here and also a print-only article, Delicious Dish: Parody or Problem? in the February 5, 1999 issue of the Current newspaper. Calwatch 21:41, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for finding that. I've re-written the reference to summarize the source you linked. -Will Beback 23:07, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Actually, the print article agrees with the statement originally in the article, so I have reverted the article with that source. Calwatch 01:25, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Parody of what?
Talk:Mwesa Isaiah Mapoma

message: In my view, this article does assert the importance or significance of the subject, and consequently does not warrant speedy deletion. I think that being one of Zambia's leading ethnomusicologists makes him notable. Still, the article is a stub, and I would like to see it expanded, ideally with a list of his publications. TruthbringerToronto 07:29, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not speedy 
Talk:Dutch (1991 film)

message: It wasn't "on sale" but free. Please edit it. Thanks. The "free" sticker was over Ed O'Neil's eyes to mask his identity from being the same actor as seen in MWC. Macshill (talk) 06:53, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  MWC episode 
Talk:Paul Beliën

message: I added the NPOV-template. The present article is biased, and minimises the far right connections of the subject. (See discussions above) --LucVerhelst 10:34, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Biased? Oh wait, the article probably needs some prime minister saying that Belien is a "fascist," or is this not what you are saying? Intangible 10:56, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What, have you got a source for that, then ? --LucVerhelst 11:24, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The article is not biased. I'm removing the POV tag. Intangible 16:11, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You can't write a biographical article based on the subject's publications alone. That is called a hagiography, and is not encyclopedic. --LucVerhelst 16:16, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm sorry, but the article is neutral, like it or not. I'm removing the tag. Intangible 16:23, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV-template added 

message: This (for instance): "Belien received this appointment (...) because of his emergence as one of Europe's leading experts on lawful Islamism" looks pretty much biased ("leading expert") and dubious (can somebody explain what is "lawful Islamism"?). In fact the whole article must be read with a particularly critical eye. Much of the material in the article is supported by what seem to be unreliable sources (e.g. biased articles written by Paul Belien himself). --Edcolins 11:27, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, the data for this paragraph comes from the website of Islam Watch itself, and was not written by Belien. Stijn Calle 16:58, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have switched the statement to a quotation and sourced it. Kaldari 21:36, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biased and dubious material 

message: The correct name of this person is "Paul Beliën", not "Paul Belien" which is the Americanized variant of his name. Can someone please change that? I don't know how I can do it myself. Berchemboy (talk) 13:19, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong article title 

message: I am nominating this section for POV-checking. At present, the section describes the "1990 Baudouin abortion question" as the main reason for Beliën's dismissal, downplaying other motives (see the Knack article). --Luxem (talk) 08:54, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  1990 Baudouin abortion question 

message: I think Belien has been cited as a source for the conspiracy theory about alleged links between pedophile activists and freemasons in Belgium, a theory which was popularized after the Marc Dutroux affair. It would be a good idea to read up on his writings on those disturbing affairs and on Freemasons in general. ADM (talk) 09:32, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Pedophiles and Freemasons