Talk:List of diplomatic missions of Russia

message: I remember reading that the SU had cut off ties to some African nations. Now, does that mean that the SU/Russia broke all diplimatic ties or abandoned the embassies? Or was it just a cut off of aid?
::Just because a country cuts off aid does not necessarily mean it has closed its embassy.  Kransky 02:53, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ties to countries in the developing world

message: Russia does have an office in Lingayen because during the 14th National Student Convention in Lingayen, Pangasinan my girlfriend Yelena (she`s a Russian living in the Philippines) lost her Russian Passport in Lingayen in so doing local authorities told her to go to the Russian office in Lingayen. I also accompanied her. Yelena showed the her Russian papers and the office passed on the info to the Russian embassy in Manila where we live. I even accompanied her.
::The consular list, maintained by the Philippines Department of Foreign Affairs, would be an authorative source.  It cannot substantiate your claims that Russia has any diplomatic presence in the Philippines beyond its Embassy in the Philippines.  Kransky (talk) 14:23, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Russia does have an office in Lingayen

message: I have re-introduced the formatted, sortable list into this article for the reasons below:
# It is my intent to eventually bring this list to featured list status. It would not be possible to do that with the list as it was before. As per Featured list criteria, this list complies with manual of style guidelines, it is well structured with sortable tables as per #4, it visually looks good by making use of the entire page, photos are constantly being added due to efforts by myself in reaching out to photographers from far-flung corners of the globe.
#:Oppose:  The current format complies with manual of style guidelines.  What you are saying about your format, and your efforts, just as much applies to other contributors.  I am not convinced that we would ever complete updating the 180+ articles to comply with the format you are suggesting, leaving the style of the articles to be inconsistent.Kransky (talk) 13:54, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for providing an opportunity to comment.  Kransky (talk) 13:54, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem Kransky, we are all here to create content in a collaborative setting, and to overcome any hurdles which may be placed in our way. Do not think that my comments are an attack on any editor or their contributions, they are merely my own opinions on how to better develop these lists in a way that will allow them to reach featured list status (I think that is the goal for all articles, albeit, some articles just aren't going to reach WP:FL or WP:FA status - an example is Moshonki, eh Ezhiki). So that you know Kransky, being upfront here, the guy with the long name is posting here as I have asked him for his opinion on the impasse which yourself and I have seemed to reach; I have not asked him for comment in his role as an admin (his opinion counts no more than yours or mine...well maybe just less than mine lol), but as what I regard as a prolific person within the WP:RUSSIA wikiproject and his long experience; it is not a gang up job or anything else, to be honest, surprisingly this is really the first time that he and I have really crossed paths, except for his nasty, nasty (joking) revert of my move of Anadyr (town) to Anadyr, and additionally due to his own efforts to create lists in which there are very few editors (in some case the only editor), and how he went about it, particularly in regards to getting a list to WP:FL. So just know that we can discuss this and hear each other's point of views, and weigh them up for what is in the best interests of the project overall. I will be responding to the above comments shortly. Cheers. --Russavia Dialogue Stalk me 22:18, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: One thing, I will be copying all of the above comments to the talk page of WP:FOR and I will post a message on all of the diplomatic missions articles talk pages to alert editors as to this discussion so that we can achieve a consensus from a wide range of people; because this will affect all diplomatic mission articles. Any objections to that Kransky? I am assuming that there won't be so I will be WP:BOLD and do so, and let us all please continue the discussion at the link which I will be posting in the very near future (few hours). I will ensure it is all copied in its entireity but will add info where needed to point out that this is due to this article. --Russavia Dialogue Stalk me 22:25, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-introduction of formatted, sortable list 

message: There is now a discussion at WP:FOR on the formatting and content of "List of diplomatic missions" articles. As this discussion ostensibly could affect this article, editors are encouraged to provide their opinions on the WP:FOR at this link - Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_International_relations#Formatting_of_diplomatic_missions_lists - please do not discuss on this article talk page as valid points for consideration may very well not be seen by editors at large. Thank you, --Russavia Dialogue Stalk me 00:11, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion at WP:FOR on formatting and content of "List of diplomatic missions" article 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of diplomatic missions of Russia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080925154719/http://www.ln.mid.ru/zu_r.nsf/straweb?OpenView to http://www.ln.mid.ru/zu_r.nsf/straweb?OpenView
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:41, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Does it still exist and what is its status? Xx236 (talk) 07:51, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strasbourg (Permanent Mission to the Council of Europe)