lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Lilium michiganense

message: I changed the picture for this plant. Im sorry if it upsets anyone, freely change it back. But I believe this picture shows a better view of the plant than the previously posted image. -- IvanTortuga 06:11, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture

message: This photo may be of use in the eventual development of this page, since the pattern of leaf whorls on the stem is the most obvious feature distinguishing the North American michigan lily from the Eurasian tiger lily.Douglas W. Jones (talk) 03:08, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whorled leaves 
Talk:Limnophila sessiliflora

message: Hii 114.79.143.74 (talk) 09:29, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  H
Talk:Lingonberry jam

message: I changed it from lowbush cranberries to mountain cranberries because the wikipedia page on lingonberries says that its a fallacy.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.17.44.239 (talk) 20:49, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Which inland? The inland of scandinavia?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:908:D943:8980:3934:FB37:C91A:762D (talk) 08:18, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "lingonberries are plentiful in the forested areas of the inland"
Talk:Lollo rosa

message: Lollo rosa is a variant spelling of Lollo rosso. In 2006, Lollo rosso was  with a redirect to lettuce on the grounds that there was unlikely to be enough about a variety of lettuce to justify an article. I propose we do the same with this orphan page. Grafen (talk) 08:55, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge/replace with redirect
Talk:Nonribosomal peptide

message: Is this term equivalent to polyamino acid.  The non-ribosomally produced amino acid polymer cyanophycin is one of a class I read of under the name polyamino acid. Whether yes or no, the article should clarify this point. ike9898 19:35, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Intro says "While there exist a wide range of peptides that are not synthesized by ribosomes, the term nonribosomal peptide typically refers to a very specific set of these as discussed in this article." - no source! So what are the wide range of peptides that are not synthesized by ribosomes and not covered by this article ? - Rod57 (talk) 14:34, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  What are the other peptides not made by ribosomes
Talk:Maple decline

message: I have added a last sentence to this article in an effort to ameliorate the Chicken Little and wolf-crying aspects of this article, which appears to be the direct result of two "papers" appearing in any Google search on the topic. These papers do not describe a disease or syndrome or even a widely noticed phenomenon, but a set of conditions or symptoms which affect all trees, or plants, or animals, for that matter. I may be wrong, but I'm of the opinion the articles in question have been blown out of proportion and have manufactured another "thing to worry about" where none existed before.
Contrast, for instance, Sudden Oak Death, the Emerald Ash Borer, or Chestnut blight, all widely known and studied factors affecting certain and specific trees.
"The Cult of the Amateur" strikes again. What's next? 
"The Plants in my Garden" Decline?
Nickrz 14:06, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A google scholar search shows there is a vast literature on maple decline (or sugar maple decline). No doubt we could do a better job of summarizing it (including things like forestry data on prevalence, or lack thereof, of maples over time). Kingdon (talk) 18:49, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crying Wolf
Talk:Deserted medieval village

message: Does not state status if exactly three houses.  --Daniel C. Boyer 19:40, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Old talk page posts

message: This article was merged into Abandoned village. I have undone this merge because the topic of DMVs is a very large and important one in British archaeology. This article requires expansion by specialists, not removal.
--Agrestis (talk) 09:42, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverting Merge 

message: I hate to be the pedantic person to bring this up, but.... Article intro says, if there are less than three buildings, it is considered deserted, more than three, it is shrunken. So what if there are exactly three buildings? If the source has a better explanation we should copy it. It should be "three or more" or "four or more" and "three or less" or "two or less". At the moment it is not clear what a site with exactly three buildings is considered, it is not massively important, but, a small alteration of words would clear up the ambiguity and make it clear. If the source is also unclear, then...I don't know.  Carlwev  22:46, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  More or less than three?
Talk:The Loves

message: This is not a spam/advertising page! It's part of a mini-project of mine to create at least a stub article for 'major' bands on the UK indie scene (arbitrarily defined by myself as having been active for at least five years with at least two non self-published album releases). I am well aware that the article is missing is some basic information (such as the band members' names!) and that it will require major expansion.  Iridescent 19:41, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Litsea cubeba

message: What language is the name may chang from? It somehow looks Chinese, but the Chinese names I found googling 
the net are 山鸡椒 shān jī jiāo and 木姜子 mù jiāng zǐ. 87.123.92.121 00:18, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Etymology
Talk:Roman Kostrzewski

message: Request for Comments
There is an RfC on the question of using "Religion: None" vs. "Religion: None (atheist)" in the infobox on this and other similar pages. 
The RfC is at Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion. 
Please help us determine consensus on this issue.--Guy Macon (talk) 09:33, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:   [[Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion|Request for Comments]]
Talk:Mesclun

message: "Chives" are not part of "mesclun".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.124.116.101 (talk) 08:07, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

message: Removed this paragraph from the article:
:In Hawaii, similar greens are grown in the region of Waimanalo on the windward side of Oahu.  Because of their origin, a similar salad mix called "Nalo Greens" is popular in Hawaiian cuisine.  Mesclun salad mixes are also grown in many other parts of the Hawaiian Islands, for example MA'O Organic Farms in the Waianae area of Oahu, Kailani Farms in Kilauea on the island of Hawaii and Kauai Fresh Farms in Kilauea, Kauai.
Based on some web research, it seems that "Nalo greens" refers to one Hawaiian farm's general output of baby mixed greense.  There's some evidence of generic usage of "Nalo greens" as a type of salad mix, but I didn't find any good sources for that. Nalo Farms does sell a number of specific, named mixes, like Dean’s Greens, Asian Greens, Healthy Greens, and Koolau Mountain Greens. Bottom line, this seems to be a specific brand of salad mix rather than a regional type of mesclun. If more info is available that indicates differently, great! --Tsavage (talk) 20:55, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Nalo greens"
Talk:Momordica

message: The text "studied in nine non-insulin-dependent diabetics and six non-diabetic rats" suggests that the study was performed on nine humans and six rats.  I'm guessing this is not so, but someone who knows for sure should probably remove the extra "s" there. /85.228.39.204 (talk) 08:13, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Human trials? 

message: please name some  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.14.65.150 (talk) 23:31, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  low glycemic substances that sweeten bitter lemon
Talk:Hotchpot

message: "Abolished by s1(2) Law Reform (Succession) Act 1995 in intestacy cases from 1st January 1996".  Please specify jurisdiction. --Legis (talk - contributions) 19:48, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The 1231 part of this article seems to have originated with a single law professor (Infanti) at Pitt, who uses the term to refer to his own version of the process of determining taxability of 1231 gains.  Can anyone else find references anywhere to this?  Note that if you search the web, you'll find several instances of this Wikipedia article being quoted verbatim.  Neither code, regs, nor tax cases I can search contain this word at all.  I do find reference in Virginia family law, which is hardly relevant to Federal tax law.  I recommend deleting the tax section of this article. Oldtaxguy (talk) 02:37, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recommend deletion of tax parts
Talk:Momordica balsamina

message: Is it edible? Badagnani 09:45, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edible? 

message: thumb|right|Ripening fruit
I have removed the following paragraph from the article, until someone certifies that the Tagalog amapalaya is M. balsamina and not M. charantia:
:In the Philippines it is called "ampalaya" by the Tagalogs. It is a popular vegetable in the island of Luzon where it is mixed with other vegetables to make a stew. It is also sauteed with either shrimp, meat, pork, chicken and served with thick gravy.
Also the picture at right was taken from the Momordica charantia article but may be of M. balsamina. --Jorge Stolfi (talk) 22:06, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed disputed material pending verification
Talk:Neocinnamomum

message: This  pagw http://www.umsl.edu/~renners/Laurales%20clocks2005.pdf for this cite: "Pollination biology
In most Lauraceae, the staminal appendages and staminodes are nectariferous. Pollinators comprise a relatively broad spectrum of bees, flies, and beetles but also other insects (Kubitzki and Kurz, 1984; Endress, 1990; Forfang and Olesen, 1998). However, some genera have staminal appendages that lack a nectariferous function (e.g., Aniba, Licaria; Kubitzki and Kurz, 1984), and a few genera have lost their staminal appendages altogether (e.g., Anaueria, Mezilaurus, Williamodendron; Rohwer, 1993) as is probably also the case for the fossil flower. Pollen seems to be the only compensation offered to visiting insects in these nectarless representatives (Kubitzki and Kurz, 1984). Small pollen-collecting Trigona bees (Meliponinae) are reported to be the main flower visitor of the nectarless Aniba and Licaria as well as of Mezilaurus at the time of anther dehiscence (Kubitzki and Kurz, 1984; van der Werff, 1987). In closely related families where no nectar is present in the flowers, other pollination systems with pollen-feeding beetles or gall midges are present (Monimiaceae, Lorence, 1985; Siparunaceae, Renner et al., 1997)...."
83.44.49.151 (talk) 11:34, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I've tried accessing this pdf document but have failed twice; I get a window telling me the file may be damaged or corrupted. Therefore it is currently invalid as a potential reference,  at least to me anyway. PaleCloudedWhite (talk) 22:04, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: That;s odd, I can't get it now either, but did access it about 12 hours ago (for the Potoxylon page). The first page is accessible here, but of course that is much less informative than the whole article. Nadiatalent (talk) 23:41, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  ref: http://www.umsl.edu/~renners/Laurales%20clocks2005.pdf
Talk:Noxious weed

message: It should be more diverse and applicable  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.90.226.91 (talk) 21:01, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have hidden the section about Idaho. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 03:02, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  This artical focuses too much on idaho 

message: The term "noxious weed" is used in the New World, but not the UK or Europe, but a similar concept exists there.  WP is a catalouge of concepts not of term (for that see wiktionary).  Therefore I propose a merge with weed control.--Kevlar (talk • contribs) 16:09, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: – Wbm1058 (talk) 17:39, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge 

message: I'm a bit surprised at the article only talking about noxious weeds in the English speaking countries. Is 'noxious weed' a specific, legal term  or someting alike within those legal systems?
Because similar concepts exist at least in a couple of non-English speaking European countries as well, but I'm not sure whether they differenciate between invasive species and species declared as noxious weeds (which doesn't strictly imply invasive species).
Thank you, whoever is able to shed some light onto this! :)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.147.75.78 (talk) 10:53, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is 'noxious weed' a specific term in western anglophone countries?  

message: I want to make it say "Noxious Weeds". Booklover1018 (talk) 16:47, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can I add and s to the title of the article?
Talk:Quercus texana

message: I propose changing the common name for this species to Nuttall's oak and Texas red oak.  These are the accepted common names on well respected sites such as  Flora of North America Flora,  USDA Plant Profiles, and  Trees of North America.   According to those sources, the common name Buckley's oak (currently used in this article) applies to Quercus buckleyi  (See:  Flora of North America, USDA Plant Profiles, and  Trees of North America.   Personally, I do not like the common name Texas red oak for current-day Q. texana, since this species occurs mostly to the east of Texas and that common name was only adopted because of the Q. texana/Q. buckleyi misidentification.   But I also concede that it is important to have the Wikipedia article agree with the current-day literature.  And yes, the Q. buckleyi page should also be revised based on this discussion.  Comments please.  Pinethicket (talk) 21:30, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Common names 

message: Does Quercus texana Buckley really occur in North Carolina as commonly as was indicated in the added reference, or is this a misidentification and/or referring to some other species, like Quercus palustris? see page in the reference: G. Pinchot & W. W. Ashe's 1891 "Timber trees and forests of North Carolina". For Q. texana, there is a single county near the east coast on BONAP, nothing on USDA PLANTS, and nothing in FNA. —Hyperik ⌜talk⌟ 22:16, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: My understanding is that the name Q. texana has long been confused/misapplied. I wouldn't trust any source that isn't very recent. Plantdrew (talk) 23:21, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Occurrence along east coast
Talk:Oak apple

message: From what I remember of these guys, the insides are actually pretty cool looking.  It would be nice to have pictures here of a cut-open gall. --71.62.74.115 (talk) 11:50, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Addendum:  I found a picture online, but it's user-contributed, and I'm not sure of their site's image policy. --71.62.74.115 (talk) 11:57, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  How about internal/cutaway images? 

message: The section on ink uses the term but does not define it. Is it a synonym of "gall"?
IAmNitpicking (talk) 05:23, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gall nuts?
Talk:Jokhang

message: The Tibet Post is claiming the Chinese authorities are in the process of demolishing it - anyone heard anything to corroborate that? Max sang (talk) 22:54, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Still Standing?

message: Was the Jokhang Nyingma and then Gelug? Is it considered pansectarian?Sylvain1972 19:50, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Over the centuries it was fought over and under the control of many different rulers and sects. The best source is: Gyurme Dorje, Tashi Tsering, Heather Stoddard and André Alexander (2010) Jokhang: Tibet's most sacred Buddhist Temple. London, Thames & Hudson.  - a large profusley illustrated volume.  Chris Fynn (talk) 17:45, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Sects?

message: The location needs correction to 29.653048, 91.132049.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.246.146.83 (talk) 15:18, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Coordinates
Talk:Oleanane

message: :Feild & Arens, The ecophysiology of early angiosperms, Plant, Cell and Environment 30: 291–309 (2007)
cites
:Nakane et al, Fern constituents: triterpenoids from Adiantum capillus-veneris, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin (Tokyo) 50: 1273–1275 (2002)
for the presence of oleanane in ferns. The former also mentions its presence in Bennettitales, which would be among the candidates for the sister group of flowering plants. Lavateraguy 19:23, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Oleanane in ferns
Talk:The Black Tusk

message: Is there a way to move all the photos below this page to Wikimedia Commons? There's more photos of Black Tusk on Commons rather than on Wikipedia and I think it would be more appropiate, especially because of the photo layout problem. Black Tusk (talk) 19:59, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Photos

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Black Tusk 4.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on April 19, 2012. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2012-04-19. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! —howcheng  {chat} 17:50, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Black Tusk 4.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon 
Talk:Orthosiphon

message: May be called: 貓鬚草, or 化石草. Hongthay (talk) 03:38, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chinese Medicine 

message: aristatus = stamineus? Oddly enough, there are two separate articles for these 2 names.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 160.111.254.17 (talk) 12:24, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  aristatus/stamineus
Talk:Nicholas Kehoe

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- HornandsoccerTalk 01:49, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Zaïko Langa Langa

message: A discography section would be nice. Zazaban (talk) 22:36, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done - finally. DBlomgren (talk) 03:09, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discography 

message: Should it remain as is or should the name actually be Zaïko Langa Langa? I have no opinion as I know nothing about this band it's just that it struck me as an odd redirect to have for no reason and as such I hope that somebody more knowledgable might be able to clear this up. Thanks. Keresaspa (talk) 18:28, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name 

message: Article still has a lot of Neutral Point of View issues - opinions should be either deleted or given citations from relevant sources who are not connected with the band.  For example, see 2nd & 3rd sentences.  Also, imperfect English style and grammar (esp. wrong tenses of verbs) could use cleaning up.  Acwilson9 (talk) 21:48, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV
Talk:Libidibia ferrea

message: Hi, could someone please change "it's" to "its" near the end of this article?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.66.27.197 (talk) 13:07, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening heading 

message: Is "Pao Ferro" supposed to be capitalized? The article title is, but the article itself is inconsistent.Chickencha (talk) 15:14, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalization 

message: The wood database lists Pau Ferro as the common name for Machaerium scleroxylon.
https://www.wood-database.com/pau-ferro
Also, the guitar parts supplier stew-mac equates Pau Ferro with Machaerium scleroxylon.
Libidibia ferrea and Machaerium scleroxylon are in the same family, Fabaceae (legumes), but different genus.
Does anyone have a source for the assertion that Pau Ferro is a common name for Libidibia ferrea?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by GregHolmberg (talk • contribs) 02:23, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The consensus of companies that sell "pau ferro" lumber for guitar building and other uses is that it refers to Machaerium species. How did we arrive at the idea that Libidibia ferrea is used in guitar building? 2601:647:CC00:30E0:E0B6:4201:F54E:157F (talk) 17:19, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pau Ferro: Libidibia ferrea or Machaerium scleroxylon?
Talk:Womb Realm

message: For Womb Realm somebody gave the meaning of "garbhakosa-dahtu" (Skt. garbhakosa-dhatu), but for Diamond Realm you gave the meaning "vajradhatu" (vajradhatu). Is this knowledge or is this an error?
By giving those different words people may think that those realms are of different qualities, the womb realm with a "body" (kosa) and the Diamond Realm without a "body". 
Is this what teaching says?
:Austerlitz -- 88.75.80.63 (talk) 18:03, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Questions
Talk:Gladiolus murielae

message: I'm pretty sure this is a Gladiolus. However, the descriptions seems to be a little off. Besides, Abyssinian gladiolus is a common name and not a scientific name.--Lenticel (talk) 06:42, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  move and other edits 

message: According to the World checklist of Monocotyledons  (by Kew Botanical Gardens) Gladiolus callianthus Marais, 1973  is a synonym of Gladiolus murielae  Kelway, 1932 .  JoJan (talk) 18:40, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  synonym
Talk:Pease pudding

message: There seems little reason to declare it a specifically NE English dish. 
Used to be popular in London as evidenced by reference to it in the theatre show Oliver set in Dickensian London and well known such regions as Dorset 2A00:23C6:2003:DE01:21B6:D18C:D67D:A4B1 (talk) 18:12, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regionalllity
Talk:Persian berry

message: From Cyclopaedia of Practical Receipts 6th ed. (1880), p.762 (image 775):
:The unripe berries or fruit of the Rhamnus infectorius. They are imported from France and Persia; those from the latter country being esteemed the best. Some writers state that the Persian berries are the product of a distinct species, namely, R. amydalinus. They are chiefly used for dyeing morocco leather yellow. Their decoction dyes cloth, previously mordanted with alum, tartar, or protochloride of tin, of a yellow colour; with sulphate of copper, an olive; and with red sulphate of iron, an olive-green colour.
I assume the amydalinus is a printing error for amygdalinus, though Rhamnus doesn't list anything by either name. Hv (talk) 16:08, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added reference
Talk:Jamyang Khyentse Wangpo

message: *Cousens, Diana. The Visionary Lineages of Jamyang Khyente Wangpo 
B9 hummingbird hovering (talk • contribs) 00:09, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  An excellent source to iterate this article 
Talk:Persian melon

message: I made a bold edit to redirect this article to Cantaloupe.  I was watching an episode of Sanford & Son (S2, E3) and Aunt Ethel (she pre-dates Aunt Esther) compared the size of her gallbladder to a Persian Melon.  I looked up Persian Melon and the original Wiki stub suggested the fruit was Cucumis melo, which is the same binomial nomenclature as the Cantaloupe.  I'm no botanist, so if I made any unfortunate assumptions, they were made in good faith, and I hope my fellow Wikipedians will forgive me. :D  Cyphoidbomb (talk) 08:26, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it's not so simple as going with the scientific name, but your redirect makes some sense. Not all Cucumis melo are cantaloupes (most melon varieties come from this species). "True cantaloupes" are a variety that doesn't show up outside of continental Europe, but various other orange flesh varieties of Cucumis melo are often referred to as cantaloupes, as the cantaloupe article mentions. Persian melons are orange fleshed, so it seems reasonable to merge with the current cantaloupe article which takes a broad definition of the term. Plantdrew (talk) 22:02, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect