Talk:Vilna offensive

message: :Image:Polish army in Wilno 1919.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 08:33, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Polish army in Wilno 1919.jpg

message: Certain croup of polish volunteers insisting that tag should be removed because, there is no ongoing discussion. May I ask which WP official policy suggest and states that unsolved arguments stated previously and previuos discussion becomes invalid after some time? M.K. (talk) 13:45, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Am I understand correctly, you failed to present any rationale with regards of official WP policies, which support previuos edits that older unsolved arguments and discussion becomes invalid? I will wait for a while to receive more precise answer. M.K. (talk) 15:17, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Currently it is you who have failed to present any arguments. Tags require rationale, which is quite visibly lacking here. Removal of tags without rationale is perfectly in line with our policies.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  16:12, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Tagging

message: What is the intended meaning of this sentence in the lead: In the aftermath, the Vilna offensive would cause much turmoil on the political scene in Poland and abroad. --Lysytalk 08:03, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: What is unclear about it? It was covered, discussed and criticized (and supported) by many for various reasons.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  18:38, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

text: It was supposed to describe the aftermath section. Feel free to adjust it if you feel it sounds strange.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  19:43, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Much turmoil 

message: Hi, just noticed something you might want to address. The inline citations cite Davies, but there are two books by Davies in the references section. It might be a good idea to explain in the inline citation which one you mean.--Jackyd101 (talk) 15:26, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Unless otherwise noted, they refer to his WERS monography on the PSWar.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  16:30, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: One reads in the article following: "...The leader of the Polish forces, Józef Piłsudski, discerned an opportunity for regaining territories that were once the part of the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth, and since then were the part of the Prussia Empire, shaken by the 1917 Revolution and the ongoing Russian Civil War..." -- Vilnius, however, was never a part of Prussia Empire and there was no such thing as Prussia Empire at all. I think the reference here is made to Russian Empire.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.139.88.253 (talk) 08:48, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong reference to Prussia Empire?