lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Leonard Rossiter

message: The box says his first marriage (to Josephine Tewson) ended in 1961; the text says that in 1962 he was still married to her. Which is right? PrivateSponge (talk) 10:23, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Dates of first marriage

message: Concerning recent additions, while there are not the same standards as with a living person, it does not mean people have carte blanche to include every bit of gossip that crops up.
A lot of names are being bandied about in the wake of the Jimmy Savile scandal, as is always the way with such high-profile cases, and we should be extremely wary of reproducing rumours here (even on talk pages).
I can think of few things to accuse somebody of worse than has been suggested by one editor here, and I'd suggest it would take a lot more than an anonymous source in the Sun to include it. If something comes of it, things may change, but if it remains as an isolated and unsubstantiated rumour it would set a very bad precedent to include it.
Whatever your views, please discuss contentious edits on talk first. BearAllen (talk) 10:22, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, WP:V and WP:UNDUE still apply after a person has died.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 11:29, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  A word of caution 

message: It isn’t true that he "broke into film roles with Billy Liar” since he was in two prior films, including a more than trivial part in This Sporting Life.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.46.211.151 (talk) 01:00, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Correction  - Polly Tunnel (talk) 11:43, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Entry into film
Talk:Nephthytis

message: This page apparently lists Arrowhead Philodendron, Nephthytis, and Syngonium podophyllum as the same thing.  It says:
:This species appears to have been cultivated as a houseplant since the end of the 19th century. It’s been confused botanically with an African genus, Nephthytis, which it resembles. Even though the American species were reclassified in 1879 to their own genus, the original name stuck as a common name.
So Syngonium podophyllum is the new name?  And the old was something Nephthytis? — Omegatron 14:51, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name change
Talk:Philodendron

message: (Dead link removed) This page  apparently lists Arrowhead Philodendron, Nephthytis, and Syngonium podophyllum as the same thing.  It says:
:This species appears to have been cultivated as a houseplant since the end of the 19th century. It’s been confused botanically with an African genus, Nephthytis, which it resembles. Even though the American species were reclassified in 1879 to their own genus, the original name stuck as a common name.
So Syngonium podophyllum is the new name?  And the old was something Nephthytis? — Omegatron 14:51, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name change  

message: At one place in the article it says all parts of the plant are poisonous.  At another place it says the fruit is edible.  I'd change it, but I don't know which statement is incorrect.
66.188.107.113 (talk) 02:27, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edible? 

message: I rated this a B-class, but it could definately be rated much higher if it had more pictures. For Philodendrons the variability of leaf and growth habit is so variable that an article like this really needs alot of pictures to illustrate the explanations.  Chhe 21:28, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rating

message: Reliable sources, such as Plants of the World Online here, say the genus occurs throughout most of South America, contrary to the recently added map. Peter coxhead (talk) 20:40, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distribution map 

message: Why is Monstera Deliciosa used as an example of Pinnation in the genus when it's not a member? I think the writer saw the common name and got confused  2600:1004:B187:EBFC:300D:39B8:3468:6791 (talk) 20:08, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. Peter coxhead (talk) 09:25, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Monsters Deliciosa listed as example
Talk:MSXML

message: MSXML 3.0 has namespace MSXML2, but MSXML 2.5 has namespace MSXML. Thus they are not compatible. It is required to verify correctness of "CLSIDs and ProgIDs it exposes have been subsumed by MSXML 3.0" AZiubin (talk) 16:20, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Compatibility issues

message: Can someone give examples for Windows-native XML-based applications? --80.139.14.165 (talk) 21:58, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  XML-based application? 

message: I realize that an article titled MSXML is bound to be pretty technical in nature but I'm wondering if it could be somewhat less so.
For example, would it be reasonable to expect the article to address the questions "is it safe to uninstall MSXML from a Windows XP system?" "What might stop working if MSXML is uninstalled?"
Thanks, Wanderer57 (talk) 00:52, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dumb questions 

message: Please open a new section in order to discuss the security importance of that piece of code in modern Microsoft OS's since Vista (7,8). There is an urgent update for this core code as well as the core of Visual Studio among others in order to quickly close some fatal open in-hooks. Please give us a comprehensible view of embedding this parts (XML cores) in that modern design (W7,8)
Thanks for your really important work to bring enlightning in a quick changing IT world...
--Cosy-ch (talk) 07:02, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Security Issues 

message: This article should be deleted as it is not notable and there are no independent sources  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.142.216.205 (talk) 08:54, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed deletion
Talk:Leslie Stevens

message: Is it "Stevens" or "Stephens"? The spelling alternates in the article. 47.213.168.8 (talk) 21:52, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Daystar Productions. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 15#Daystar Productions until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 12:06, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Daystar Productions" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Lewis Nash

message: I just came to add an infobox to this article, but found so much POV and promotional sounding commentary that I began to move some of it. I also added inline referencing to get things started there. This article needs a lot of work.. and yet, there's plenty of info about Lewis Nash so I really wonder why it isn't further along. --Leahtwosaints (talk) 23:47, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: POV and other issues

message: The text for Lewis Nash was so sickly promotional in it's wording, that I found the text nearly intact from Lewis Nash at All About Jazz.com http://www.allaboutjazz.com/php/musician.php?id=9750). I did my best to remove it all -well, in some cases, I did find refs for the text which I inserted. Keep looking at what I left in the article, and remove anything that seems inappropriate. --Leahtwosaints (talk) 19:41, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violation? 
Talk:David Leebron

message: Wait a second - I thought Norman Hackerman was the first Jewish president of Rice - he signed my Rice degree.  I think Leebron is the SECOND Jewish president of Rice.  Not that it really matters - both got there based on performance.  And I'm not Jewish (far from it).  P.S.--And Leebron has a long way to go to match Hackerman - Hackerman was involved in the WWII atomic bomb project - he was an expert in corrosion.  Leebron, you've got some catching up to do.109.154.5.232 (talk) 11:52, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Leebron "first Jewish president of Rice"
Talk:David M. Medina

message: *North Texas Pentecostal church Pleasant Glade Assembly of God vs. Laura Schubert, June 27, 2008ap.google.com, Texas high court rules exorcism protected by lawchron.com, Court reverses judgment against church in exorcisms--Florentino floro (talk) 10:53, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Some notable opinions
Talk:David McCarty

message: There isn't really a need to separate the "Fact" and "Trivia" categories on this page, since they're being used in basically the same way. I think the list of position players who have pitched would work better as a Category that links to all of the players than as a segment on an individual player page. I'll leave it as is for now, so the WikiProject-Baseball folks can work with it. BigKennyK 02:57, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia/Fact 

message: Why wasn’t McCarty mentioned as a World Series Champion? He DID play with the Red Sox the entire 2004 season and he’s mentioned as one in many tributes after his death. Smokiewight (talk) 15:02, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  World Series
Talk:David Meece

message: This page lacks sufficient citations. I left material there but note that it lacks references. The citations that are there rely very heavily on secondary sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emjaikey (talk • contribs) 07:17, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. I added an additional source, and recognize that much source material lies in inaccessible print material (as he was a regular topic in print magazines such as CCM Magazine, Campus Life and other Christian sub-culture publications of the early 80s when the subject enjoyed his heyday. The fact that he has nearly two pages of coverage in  leaves me with confidence that there is more out there. What is concerning is the close phrasing to both the subject's own bio page and sections of Encyclopedia of Contemporary Christian Music. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:23, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations
Talk:David Van Os

message: This article has no sources, is horribly written, and reads like a campaign PR piece. TuckerResearch (talk) 18:26, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Issues 
Talk:Miss Cyprus

message: This article is a translation from the Miss Cyprus article in the German Wikipedia (Feb 17, 2006) 14:05 --176-617 17:04, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lise Mayer

message: IMDB and http://www.spokeo.com/Lise+Mayer+1 states that Lise Mayer was born in 1957 not 1959. I'm not confident that either are suitable for citation so I have added the comment here rather than on the page. Also note that the Google search page also states that Lise Mayer was born in 1957 and not 1959 (Where is this information gathered from?).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.243.149.59 (talk) 03:07, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of Birth Error?
Talk:Liza Goddard

message: Goddard was in a sitcom circa 1977 as Lilly Brown, wife of pianist Matt. I don 't remember the show's name.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.244.236.47 (talk) 10:08, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: You probably mean Yes, Honestly from 1976-77 in which she ploayed Lily Pond Browne. Just a thought, but you'd probably get a quicker answer to your questions if you asked at WP:REFDESK. It has been established specifically for this purpose. CHeers TheRetroGuy (talk) 19:22, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Matt and Lilly Brown 

message: If you take a look at this clip from 1969: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8B9LZxSvs6o&feature=related , the announcer refers to her as 'Eliza Goddard' (33 seconds into the clip), but she is credited (end credits) in the programme as 'Liza Goddard' (if you carry on watching this short clip. I don't know if the announcer made a mistake, or if she changed her name to 'Liza' for professional purposes...
99.171.230.171 (talk) 20:16, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  ELIZA Goddard?? 
Talk:Ooh I Love You Rakeem

message: Damn, this is just hilarious!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Madstarrr (talk • contribs) 17:47, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Funny 

message: Please get myisha jhonson to stop stalking me throwing at me everyday Help help drone out of controle 2600:8801:B813:BB00:4006:535D:8908:EF8D (talk) 16:16, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elizabeth Young targeted by your drones!!! 

message: Did you use you're drones to let myisha talk while 2600:8801:B813:BB00:4006:535D:8908:EF8D (talk) 16:20, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Locked up. She chases me for fun what else could come between you two? Elizabeth Young
Talk:Dax McCarty

message: Jon, here's the source:  DemonJuice (talk) 22:02, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: And one from the Timbers:  DemonJuice (talk) 22:06, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Perfect! I hadn't seen that until now. Sorry for the pedantry. Just as a matter of interest... how do we show this? Do we list Portland as one of his cluba even though he was only on their books for, what, 2-3 hours? --JonBroxton (talk) 22:07, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think the Timbers should be in the infobox at all. DemonJuice (talk) 22:08, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. --JonBroxton (talk) 22:10, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trade Source
Talk:Dayton Independent School District

message: What do you guys think of them? FoxOfTexas (talk) 22:16, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent changes in dayton 
Talk:Dayton, Texas

message: Gov. Price Daniel was the grandson of General Sam Houston.  A biography of Daniel's life has been preserved in detail by his nephew, Dan Murph - author of "Texas Giant: The Life of Price Daniel" .  The hardcover includes an introduction by Pres. George W. Bush.  StationNT5Bmedia (talk) 02:46, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gov. Price Daniel born in Dayton, TX 
Talk:Richard McBrien

message: See Category talk:Dissident Roman Catholic theologians for a proposal to remove Fr. McBrien from that category.  -- Cat Whisperer 17:08, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category Dissident Roman Catholic theologians 

message: I thought it was appropriate to add the words "by some" into the phrase "and is considered to be a dissenter from church teachings." It now reads "and is considered by some to be a dissenter from church teachings."  I thought it was a small (but needed) change, considering that Fr McBrien is surely not considered a dissenter by all (or even necessarily a majority).  With the definition of whether or not he is dissenting being relatively subjective, I think it is in keeping with the encyclopaedic nature of wiki to add the words.
David-Ryan (talk) 13:02, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dissent  

message: I was 90% certain McBrien was a Holy Cross priest, not a priests in the diocese of Hartford.  Can anyone verify this?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ThomistGuy (talk • contribs) 00:13, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah he was diocese of Hartford. Odd of course because he was at Notre Dame which is CSC. Jjazz76 (talk) 03:31, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Congregation of Holy Cross 

message: I came across this article from google and I noticed that there are citations needed for the section "criticism of popes." I believe that all of the uncited quotes came from the same article in catholiculture (http://www.catholicculture.org/culture/library/view.cfm?recnum=6710).
Here is the source for each of the quotes individually:
"Some of my liberal friends just say he’s a disaster and can see nothing good that he’s done"
Source: Bob Keeler, "Pope John Paul II: His Legacy," Newsday, April 3, 2005
"thousands upon thousands of Catholics in Europe and the United States would roll their eyes and retreat to the margins of the Church"
Source: Daniel Williams and Alan Cooperman, "Conclave Begins with Day of Ritual," Washington Post, April 19, 2005.
"watching 115 men in liturgical dress. There isn’t a woman among them"
Source: "Special Report," April 18, 2005, ABC News Transcripts (available on Lexis-Nexis)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.233.163.79 (talk) 02:57, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources for Criticism of Popes
Talk:Dirichlet eta function

message: The factor 1-2^(1-s) is zero for s=1 AND also for s=1+2*k*Pi*i, k integer. 
So ...
1) The eta function has zeros on Re(s)=1, which do not show up very clearly on the color plot (which looks like a plot of zeta(s) instead).
2) The eta function cannot be used to define the zeta function at s=1+2*k*Pi*i, for k integer.
If you agree with this, please edit the page, and if possible provide a clearer plot.
The French Wikipedia page is already corrected: http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fonction_z%C3%AAta_de_Riemann 
Jacques Gelinas  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.67.50.57 (talk) 02:25, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two relatively minor corrections 

message: Hello- 
would it be possible to explain, what the "n" means in the Borwein-formula?
Thanks -
Gottfried Helms
--84.138.235.250 17:07, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: my guess would be that n is an arbitrary number, and the algorithm is improved in the limit as n -> infinity. Scythe33 01:14, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parameter in Borwein formula 

message: I removed a line from the bottom of the article stating:
The general form for even positive integers is:
\eta(2n) = (-1)^{n+1}{{B_{2n}\pi^{2n}(4^{n} - 1)} \over {(2n)!}}.
Carifio24 originally posted a different version of the equation.  The version I have removed was a later attempt by Carifio24 to simplify the expression.  However, he must have simplified incorrectly because the two equations give different results.  At any rate, I don't think either of them are correct, because eta for a positive integer should always yield a positive value. If anyone knows the correct formula, please add it in! 66.243.144.178 (talk) 03:30, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  General form for even positive integers 

message: Could we just enclose the proof of the relationship between the Riemann zeta function and the Dirichlet eta function?  It's a very simple proof, one that wouldn't take up much space.  
Furthermore, when the eta function is defined  in the Dirichlet series expansion, couldn't the first couple terms of the series be given?  It makes it much easier to get a feel of the series. My 2 Cents' Worth (talk) 17:08, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Connection to Zeta Function 

message: I don't think this is a good phrase, and if there is no objection I can rewrite the paragraph and rework sentences like "Thus the eta function has five countable infinities of zeros, while the zeta function has only three", which don't really make much sense. One problem is that if RH is true, the claim is simply false. Gene Ward Smith (talk) 00:53, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infinites of zeros 

message: I think there is a mistake in this image. Since the dirichlet eta function can be expressed in terms of the zeta function as \eta(s) = \left(1-2^{1-s}\right) \zeta(s), it can't have any zeros where the zeta function doesn't. All its zeros should be in the line with real part . Blackbombchu (talk) 00:51, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mistake in dirichlet eta function image
Talk:Texperts

message: Disclaimer: I am not an independent party, as I have worked for RE5ULT as a contractor for a couple of years now. For that reason I am adding this note here, as I don't think it is appropriate that I make changes directly to the page itself. However, if no one responds after a while then I will update the page directly.
The final sentence of the first paragraph reads, "The service is similar to Issuebits' Any Question Answered." This together with a factual inaccuracy on the Any Question Answered page suggest that RE5ULT's 82ASK is in some way a derivative or copy of AQA. However, 82ASK was launched on 3rd August 2003, pretty much creating the market sector, approximately nine months before AQA was launched on 22nd April 2004. The best source on this is a PMN article from 30th April 2004; although it is no longer online the Internet Archive's Wayback Machine has a copy of it.
It would be more appropriate if the reference to AQA was dropped from the first paragraph and put at the end instead, as a similar service which subsequently entered the market. DZR 17:08, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed! Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry 20:00, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Minor niggle

message: I have inserted the Template:Out of date banner at the top of this page for a couple of reasons. 1. The article suggests that this company or service is growing at a rate of 20pc per month - the reference for this is an article written in a UK newspaper The Sunday Times published in 2007. Although I'm sure this was factually correct at the time, I assume that this type of business is open to many threats in the market, and therefore that this 2007 reference may be out of date. 2. The website listed for this service is Texperts.com, which does not exist. Perhaps it once did, although I cannot find reference to it on the internet. TehGrauniad (talk) 14:14, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Out-of-date information
Talk:International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty

message: Any independent confirmation that this organisation ever existed? 
It sounds suspiciously like the ICDISS whose existence is contested
194.129.60.10 17:09, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And the article was created by User:Liliana Dioguardi. I've added a hoax tag as an alert. JQ 21:32, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

message: The ICISS is a quite legitimate Canadian-championed commission, which had widespread global participation. It was created in direct response to Kofi Annan's challenge to prevent another Rwanda. It is notable for proposing a redefined notion of sovereignty and reorienting the humanitarian intervention debate on 'responsibility to protect'. This article could thus use expansion (although a lot of the "responsibility to protect" article is directly related!). hodgetts 03:45, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion Needed 

message: The current version of this article shows a very strong bias against the Commission, which is not backed up with any sources. Can any action be taken on this? 129.125.176.90 (talk) 13:24, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias 

message: The ICISS is a legitimate organization that provides facts and backing of UN Decisions. This articles needs to be cleaned and the pov needs to be removed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.199.242.142 (talk) 14:10, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major Organization and Clean-up 

message: Without getting into a rant about Adam Smith's  'until all empires are destroyed' concept of using the methods of Imperialism, and other anti-american rants,
the section associating Bush's decision in iraq, with this seems incomplete if-true.
"just cause" as a phrase, has been used by many different kinds of americans, over a long time, under or with many different kinds of claimed-authority or claims-of-justification.
Provide MORE DETAIL, or-remove. 120.21.167.200 (talk) 07:49, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "just cause", is too small a quote, even if there is more to the part about Bush's decision
Talk:Lynda Lee-Potter

message: What on earth is a "aperçu"? Secretlondon 10:56, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Clever insights basically.87.113.199.215 (talk) 22:23, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds a bit biased to me. Why are these statements "clever insights"? They are hardly profound and I'm not sure there's anything clever about saying some people are nasty to au pairs. 82.25.177.179 (talk) 12:11, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Deep Eddy Pool

message: I don't know much about assessment either (though I helped get New Carissa to FA status), but I have some general editing questions/comments about the article: 
*Doesn't "swimming pool" imply "man-made"? (or, as I prefer to say, "artificial")
*What is this "diving baby" of which you speak? 
*Some more wikification might be in order, but other than that, like BigrTex said, this looks really good. It's at least a B-class, I think. If I have time later I can give it a more thorough going-over if you want to try to get it to GA-status or beyond.
Yours in NRHP-itude, Katr67 22:43, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your efforts, SteveHopson 22:55, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Questions