Talk:Hylidae

message: Some tree frogs lay behind unfertilised eggs as food for the tadpoles, which has become so dependent on these eggs that they can't survive without them. I am just curious; are these eggs different from the fertilised eggs in more ways than just not being fertilised? Are they more nutritious or have more yolk or something?
: They probably are not different in those repsects.  -Pgan002 03:08, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you provide a reference for the statement that many tree frogs lay unfertilized eggs as food for their tadpoles? -Pgan002 03:08, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think he/she has confused poison dart frogs for tree frogs. --liquidGhoul 06:10, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unfertilised eggs

message: I've added details about the family Rhacophoridae which are usually considered treefrogs together with the Hylidae. Is there some reason for having excluded them? Otherwise the distribution map should be altered to include them. Paul venter 20:08, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They have their own article. Tree frog is most common for Hylids. It is useful to include in the article that the common name is shared with a few other families, but since this is the most common usage of it, it has the article name. --liquidGhoul 20:28, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've altered the distribution map as well, but if the consensus is that this article should only deal with the Hylidae, then it will just have to be reverted. Paul venter 21:25, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rhacophoridae

message: I was wondering if tree frogs are poisonous?  Thank You, Linda Nichols smalllinda@tds.net —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.129.241.137 (talk) 01:57, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tree Frogs 

message: When we get more information for this page the pictures will be cleaned up right? Just wondering -- IvanTortuga 19:07, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean Up

message: The smallest frog in the world was about 0.4 inches. Some frogs can stretch there feet so there whole body is 3 times bigger than before  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.81.77.210 (talk) 15:30, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  frogs 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hylidae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071024033938/http://research.amnh.org/herpetology/amphibia/index.php to http://research.amnh.org/herpetology/amphibia/index.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:42, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This article is extremely inconsistent in terms of the inclusion of the Pelodryadidae (Australasian Tree Frogs).  Historically they were considered a subfamily of the Hylidae but they are usually now considered their own family.  The "Taxonomy and systematics" section makes no mention of the group and does not list any of the included genera, but the distribution map includes the group and there are examples and images of Pelodryadids elsewhere in the article.  Furthermore, there is no article for Pelodryadidae so this information is currently not included elsewhere on Wikipedia as far as I know.
Is someone able to fix this up so that either:
*The Pelodryadidae are completely included here and there is a note on the alternative classification OR
*The Pelodryadidae are completely excluded here and given their own article, with a note and link to the new article
1.136.109.0 (talk) 06:13, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pelodryadidae