Talk:Reviews on the Run

message: I vote we change the name to "Reviews on the Run", since the show no longer uses the "Judgment Day" name. -- VederJuda 20:57, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I say just go ahead and do it.  It seems that it's only known as Judgment Day in the U.S. and as Reviews on the Run everywhere else.  Even though I'm from the U.S. and originally knew of the show as Judgment Day I agree that the article should have the more widely used name. --TheKoG (talk|contribs) 15:57, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Agreed, especially since when the show returns to the US, it will be called "Reviews on the Run" --Elwood00 T | C 15:59, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. —Nightstallion (?) Seen this already? 18:02, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Oh God, I hope this doesn't come back to the US. Shouldn't this article have a section about criticisms? Like how they don't review games on the show, they just give their personal opinions? The show sucks in general, but that's just my opinion. But the fact that they admittedly don't give fair reviews ought to be mentioned somewhere. 68.181.224.25 20:36, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Only if you can source it. Perhaps you should review the show rather than just give your personal opinion. ;) 75.16.230.111 (talk) 22:33, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Name Change

message: :Image:JD whole.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 23:41, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:JD whole.png

message: Sorry, maybe I missed the episode, but it sounds like someone edited that one in as a prank.. - NemFX (talk) 03:47, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Abdi-malli Omar?

message: The status on whether the show is still in production is needed without original research. It's still airing, but are they still producing it? --Jack Zhang (talk) 20:13, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: status of new episode production is needed

message: This article really needs a Infobox. Henshin86 (talk) 17:49, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox

message: It appears someone removed Arkham Asylum from the Double 10s. It was originally given 9.5 and 10 but it was reviewed again for the PC and received two 10s. Scott even said he felt bad for giving it a 9.5 originally. I've included the link to the review if there are any more doubters. JaziB (talk) 00:19, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arkham Asylum 

message: The show has received a major redesign in it's logos, designs, ect. Could somebody please change the logo to represent the current one, and make a section about the redesign? Thanks.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.180.52.10 (talk) 19:36, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redesign