lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Earl of Dunmore

message: Should this page be categorized as Category:Baronetcies? -- Cimon avaro; on a pogostick. 22:40, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Text states "As a male-line descendant of the first Marquess of Atholl he is also in remainder to this peerage and its subsidiary titles" Iirc the Dukedom has a remainder to the heirs male of the father of the 2nd marquess so the earl is in reminder. Can someone check the remainder? AllsoulsDay (talk) 16:14, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This is correct per Burke's (1832). The Dunmore line appears to be the last remaining cadet branch in remainder to the Atholl dukedom, since the extinction of the Nairne line in 1837. Choess (talk) 15:38, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remainder
Talk:Brett Maher (basketball)

message: The information contained in this section was taken from an interview conducted by EntertainOZ -(the link to which was provided in "Resources"). Although amusing, I don't really see the value in having e.g., "What [Maher] would do with his last $20" on his Wiki page. No doubt that he would have a different answer to such a question if asked now. The link should remain as a valid resource, but surely more fruitful information could be gathered for the main body of text. --Wayniac 20:05, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Regarding (Removed) Trivia Section
Talk:Sydney Entertainment Centre

message: Removed the bit about Linkin Park because no one cares - 211.30.230.15 (talk) 09:05, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Linkin Park 

message: Don't know who removed it last time, but someone added this crap again, so I removed it because it really is irrelevant.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.216.118.184 (talk) 04:21, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Linkin Park Again? 

message: The article states that the centre was due to be demolished on 1 January 2016? Has it been demolished since I can't find any sources? Xwejnusgozo (talk) 00:16, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Demolition?
Talk:Spod

message: Shouldn't this be a disambiguation page? Some of these meanings seem completely unconnected to me.
82.10.238.54 (talk) 18:39, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: As comments above note, this page is rather poor.  It's more an advocacy of Talkers than an article about the term "spod".  It needs to define the term much better, as well. -- Heptite (T) (C) (@) 05:17, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overhaul needed
Talk:Serpopard

message: I was looking at the excellent photos of the Narmer Palette in the Oxford History of Ancient Egypt (, pgs 48 and 79-80) and wondered: The Palette dates from ca 3000 BC. So does Arabian domestication of camels.
Given the Semitic appearance (big noses, curled (?) hair) of the vanquished foes on the palette, it looks to me like serpopards are based on nth-hand reports of camels ... notoriously foul-tempered creatures, with a smell that repels horses (and perhaps other animals).
-- Jon Shemitz 04:05, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inexpert Speculation 

message: Since so little information exists, perhaps the fact that a serpopard, a creature of roughly this description, appears in Final Fantasy XI under the name Serpopard Ishtar should be mentioned. That's all I know about it and haven't played the game, so I'll leave the choice and writing to someone who knows.
--209.159.176.244 23:00, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  FFXI 

message: The Serpopards from Uruk and the Serpopards on the Narmer Palette are clearly the same invented creature. Both of these artefacts are from around 3000 BC. The Narmer Palette is one one of the first examples of the use of hieroglyphs. They demonstrate cultural contact between Uruk and Egypt at this early time in Egyptian history. Anyone got any refs that say that? Aarghdvaark (talk) 08:23, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link between Mesopotamia and Egypt
Talk:Patricia Janus

message: Dear Pearle, 
You and your colleage DMG413 added cleanup tag to this page. I "cleaned up" the article and left the tag but notice that you have since re-added the April 2006 date. What, specifically, do you and DMG feel needs to be "cleaned up" vs. "expanded"?
Also as a general question, I'm curious why a Search for the article by "Patricia Janus" doesn't produce an actual 100% "direct hit" even though the article IS linked via the Index.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Oldpoet (talk • contribs) 23:05, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I disagree with the reassessment of this article as a B-class article. It doesn't really seem to fit that level. Probably should be at Start level at most. And the importance/priority level for the Poetry project might not be a Mid. Just wanted to question it and not simply revert the edits so we don't get into an edit war. What's the reasoning behind the changes. Thank you. -- JoannaSerah (talk) 23:10, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I've re-rated it start-class. It does not meet the b-class standards as per Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment#grades guidelines. The article is not suitably referenced. The article does not reasonably cover the topic. INeverCry  02:25, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Project class, importance
Talk:Courtney Solomon

message: Just saw American Haunting. It really sucked, eh. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.201.223.135 (talk) 05:43, 11 January 2007
Removed the part about Solomon helping direct the 2nd D&D movie. He had nothing to do with it, in fact, several people at WoTC claim he is not even allowed to own any D&D material.
Martinj63 21:22, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 2007

message: Do we add Executive Producer credits or not? --Lexein (talk) 17:08, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: 2012
Talk:Cape May–Lewes Ferry

message: I have suggested that Delaware (Cape May-Lewes Ferry), New Jersey (Cape May-Lewes Ferry) and Twin Capes (Cape May-Lewes Ferry) be merged into this article. Joelito 23:17, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds good to me. --Boothy443 |  trácht ar 04:39, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merges

message: The article curretnly includes this sentence:
:Because of the ships' shallow displacements, the ships appear almost barge-like, sitting directly atop the water, from a distance.
Please excuse the question of an ignorant landlubber, but how does a ship look like it's sitting atop (rather than in) the water?  If the M.V. Cape May were modified to have a "taller" hull (i.e. one that extended farther down into the water), then weighed down with extra ballast to compensate, so that the same amount of boat showed above the surface, wouldn't it look exactly the same? How can a boat look like it has a certain amount of draft (since draft is, by definition, the part you can't see)?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.44.94.154 (talk) 01:59, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The part I can't see looks small" 

message: I added a knots conversion to mph. Some people do not know what 1 knot converts to--Kopicz 02:02, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added 
Talk:Fox Sports World Canada

message: Is it possible someone could post a schedule for the programming on FXSW?
That would be really helpful, considering I can't download the sched on the 'official' website.--J3wishVulcan 23:35, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What is the relationship to the reactionary US Fox network? Varlaam (talk) 01:00, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fox 
Talk:Nick Denton

message: "He was once featured in a Vanity Fair photoshoot." Please, this is so offensive and pathetic, how do all these internet sports people end up on here looking for status?
peakdetector 1/31/07 11:34am
Is it really appropriate for Jason Calcanis to be editing Nick Denton's page? Plus, the stuff about Valleywag seems unbalanced and unsourced. Attacking spouses and love interests, c'mon, its a gossip site. I'm taking it down.--Delasky 23:39, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move To Delete 

message: It seems like there's a new "controversy" related to one of the Gawker Media sites every week. Are they really notable in an article on Denton? --Gotophilk (talk) 21:49, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should the Controversies section be merged into the article on Gawker Media? 
Talk:Synovial osteochondromatosis

message: Discussion and verification of permission is archived at Talk:Jumper's Knee. Melchoir 23:41, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: Evidence of synovial chondromatosis being the same as this article: They read/describe the same thing (from my general understanding), the eMED link  talks about synovial osteochondromatosis (SOC) and shows references that talk about both synovial chondromatosis AND SOC as if they are one and the same and finally:  has a reference indicating SOC as a reference (the article in German... you can clearly see it is talking about SOC), while this "whonamedit" link came from the synovial chondromatosis DDB link. The only objection would be this:  and this:  which seems to classify them as two seperate things. Any experts that can assess this would be greatly appreciated. Cheers!Calaka (talk) 11:21, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge Synovial chondromatosis into here
Talk:Tasmanian Devil (DC Comics)

message: Is it worth mentioning the joke origin from Who's Who? Hugh himself describes it in great detail in Justice League Task Force #16, probably just to annoy Triumph. Daibhid C 23:57, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Alternate origin

message: I deleted the mention of Tas in 'Justice' because research shows that James Robinson won't be writing anything with the word Justice in it until October 2009. Let's wait until the issue comes out, okay? Thanks. Lots42 (talk) 18:53, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: What are you talking about? Issue 3 is already out.... Aristophanes68 (talk) 21:55, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Further research has revealed -very- contradictory information. Lots42 (talk) 00:00, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Now I'm curious. Is it classified too? Are you reading about Robinson taking over the JLA series later on? Maybe that's what's starting in October? Meanwhile, his Cry for Justice series is halfway through.... Aristophanes68 (talk) 03:21, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'm not exactly sure what you mean. All -my- research turned up was that nothing Robinson wrote with the word 'justice' in it was going to show up until October 2009. Since that month is not here yet, I deleted said info. Wikipedia Is Not A Crystal Ball and all that jazz. Lots42 (talk) 10:07, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  What I Deleted 

message: I seem to recall that Tas' last joining of the Guardians was because his brain was washed. Noteable if true. Lots42 (talk) 17:22, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note to self 
Talk:SAPHO syndrome

message: Chronic Recurrent Multifocal Osteomyelitis should not be redirected to this page.
Although there are a few experts that think crmo is childhood sapho, many disagree.  Many consider it an autoimmune disease.  The real problem is that this article will not help parents whose children suffer from crmo.  I actually wrote a very good article about crmo with footnotes and scholarly journals.  After I saved it, it simply was no place to be seen.  I would like somebody to write a good CRMO article that knows how to make it appear in wikipedia when either Chronic Recurrent Multifocal Osteomyelitis or CRMO is queried. 
Rivcal (talk) 07:17, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Discussion and verification of permission is archived at Talk:Jumper's Knee. Melchoir 23:42, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Permission 

message: This article was categorized based on scheme outlined at WP:DERM. Calmer Waters 11:37, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article categorization 

message: The article lacks the ICD-9 and ICD-10 Codes for the disease. It would be appreciable if someone could find the codes and put them on the article.DiptanshuTalk 16:12, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  ICD-9 and ICD-10 Codes
Talk:Neuropathic arthropathy

message: Discussion and verification of permission is archived at Talk:Jumper's Knee. Melchoir 23:42, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Permission 

message: I agree with the merger tag, as they both describe the same disease. The Neuropathic arthropaty article is written better than the Charcot Arthropathy article, and thus care should be taken to not disturb its material too much.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.239.52.169 (talk) 19:24, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree too. Mikael Häggström (talk) 15:44, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger with Charcot Arthropathy 

message: I don't see the reason for the use of the picture of the ulcer, also I feel that (if it is kept) it should be further down the page so that is not on view as the page opens in a browser - it is unexpected & gruesome. Alanthehat (talk) 22:16, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree this is not that gruesome as far as ulcers go, but I don't think the picture is appropriate as I don't think this is a foot with charcot neuroarthropathy. There are better pictures of an ulcer that is caused by classic rocker bottom seen in neuroarthopathy. This one is not labelled as a charcot foot, does not appear to have a rocker bottom, and is really more typical of a decubitus ulceration in its location. Neuropathy might play a role, but when I think of these ulcers, this is not what I see. 2600:6C86:9240:7:2053:F410:3DF6:BD9B (talk) 22:00, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Appropriate use of images 

message: I am in serve pain in the left foot and leg. No longer stable.my right painful red and active. But question is how i can i tell if my foot is back in trouble of getting hurt worse ?
Biladl common ?? 
Thank you
Tina  Maryjaneroc (talk) 09:28, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biladial and reacuring charcot neuropathy
Talk:I reject your reality and substitute my own

message: This article should probably be put in wikiquotes but unfortunately it isn't easy to catagorize as it belongs to more than one source. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kc7yuw (talk • contribs) 
:I disagree. This is an article about the quote itself and its history. EVula 22:11, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Should be elsewhere
Talk:Segond fracture

message: Discussion and verification of permission is archived at Talk:Jumper's Knee. Melchoir 23:42, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Permission 

message: It is possible an image from http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k5712206r could be used to illustrate this article. I am unfortunately not in a position to determine that. Bnf has a free non-commercial use doctrine so the image can go on wikipedia (plus it is pre-1923 so could in essence do so anyway).CFCF (talk) 21:37, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Free images?
Talk:Downtown Loop (Kansas City)

message: "Each exit in the highway loop is numbered 2" - yeah, ok, but: Why? It doesn't seem to be something obvious like "all on the same mile". There must be some reason, because otherwise it could just use letters without the totally redundant number.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:9E8:2B3C:9500:8AD6:3843:31A4:EEA7 (talk) 11:19, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why only "2"?
Talk:Cairo Mississippi River Bridge

message: While I would not object to a few sentences about the general transportation history of the area, the details in the current first paragraph of the History section don't really seem relevant to the bridge itself. The bridge was built well after slavery was outlawed; no connection is purported between the steamship disaster and the building of the bridge, and even Twain's remarks on the region are unconnected with the bridge itself. Ullpianissimo – (talk) 01:19, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Irrelevance of historical incidents
Talk:Gulfside United Methodist Assembly

message: what is wrong with this atricle?
:the church is a non-notable institution.  i find limited hits on google and nothing asserting that the church has some notability to the wider world.  By the way please put the AfD tag back.  AfD tags should not be removed.Montco 00:21, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hi Jacqui.  I think it would help the article if you could add your sources to the article.  (I've created a spot near the bottom.)  Bucketsofg 01:49, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jacqui, can you cite your sources? 
Talk:John Hurt

message: Where was John Hurt actually born? It is generally agreed that John Hurt was born in Chesterfield, Derbyshire. A user recently made an edit, claiming that Hurt was born in Shirebrook. --81.135.63.31 (talk) 10:32, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthplace
Talk:Julie Walters

message: I feel that this is a misrepresentation, as Julie Walters is surely considered a grande dame of the British film and comedy scene...I am sure she has been awarded in recognition of hr various TV, stage and big screen roles...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.165.171.161 (talk) 18:03, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 'Unsung heroine...'

message: I feel this should be altered to Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone as Julie Walters is a British actress, and within the United Kingdom this is what the film is called, as is the book as per J.K.Rowling, the author of the work of literature's decision. The film is only called Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone within the United States , and India.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.110.108.14 (talk) 20:19, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have corrected this. It would appear that users keep changing it back. ~~ [ジャム][t - c] 16:47, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone

message: Added the inclusion of the excellent drama (in my humble opinion) ' A Short Stay in Switzerland',
TerrificInTahoma (talk) 03:16, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update to 2010 

message: Smethwick is part of Sandwell, though it used to be in the county of Staffordshire.109.145.147.230 (talk) 10:06, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Smethwick, Staffordshire
Talk:Timothy Spall

message: This filmography is missing A LOT. I'm going to start working on adding everything, but it will take a while. Mrmoocow 01:59, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Two other BBC 4 TV series which are not mentioned, and which form the trilogy with Back at Sea are All At Sea, and Somewhere At Sea. 86.17.111.203 (talk) 15:19, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Filmography 

message: Forest Hill is in the Borough of Lewisham - very urban and far from suburban.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.149.97.85 (talk) 14:02, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Jim Michael (talk) 01:43, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Forest Hill, London|Forest Hill]]

message: The entry for his role as Barry Taylor in "Auf Weidersehn, Pet" (AWP) said that the character was a "gormless Radish".  Whilst I agree somewhat with that statement, the use of the two words isn't that helpful here because, in my experience, they are expressions used solely within the UK and hardly as much in the USA etc.  So, I've edited it to "awkward" which I think is better.  Whether or not it is, I think it ought to be close to the spirit of the description of the character in AWP.  I also edited the link to the WP AWP, which didn't work properly. Twistlethrop (talk) 04:56, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Barry Taylor a "gormless Radish" ... 
Talk:James Chance and the Contortions

message: a) The article has the line "The African-American band members of "the Blacks," later separated from Chance and formed the band defunkt." There is a connection between the bands, but I'm not sure this is the best way to put it.
b) Can someone fix this article title to "James Chance and the Contortions"?  I don't know how, and too lazy to learn right now, but the current title "Chance & the Contortions" is just wrong. "The Contortions" would be correct as well, if less clear.  Thanks.  171.159.64.10 00:29, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 2 things

message: Moving the following paragraph that failed verification to talk:
Simon Reynolds, author of Rip It Up and Start Again : Postpunk 1978-1984 , wrote 
:And although "affection" is possibly an odd word to use in reference to a bunch of nihilists, I do feel fond of the No Wave people. James Chance's music actually stands up really well, I think. (Listen to James Chance & the Contortions, "Contort Yourself," 1979.)  
Toddst1 (talk) 12:06, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Failed Verification
Talk:The Return of Godzilla

message: From the English Wikipedia article for the Showa era:
"The Shōwa era (昭和, Shōwa) refers to the period of Japanese history corresponding to the reign of Emperor Shōwa (Hirohito) from December 25, 1926 until his death on January 7, 1989."
From the book Godzilla 1984 Completion:
"The last Godzilla movie of the Showa era leading to the Heisei era.
This is the fourth installment in the HJ Books and Tokusatsu Completions series, featuring the Godzilla series. This time, we will focus on "Godzilla" (released in 1984), the last film of the Showa era. As in the past series, the book will focus on materials that have never been made public before, such as photos from the collection and treasured materials, and will include new interviews with the cast and many of the film's staff, making for a dense and varied content."
From the Japanese wikipedia page for this movie:
"This is the last Godzilla film released during the Showa era, as the next film "Godzilla vs. Biollante" and later films were released during the Heisei era."
Sydney Perkins (talk) 19:31, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Showa era

message: Made a minor edit to correct a spelling. "Nuclear power plant" was misspelled twice with the unintentionally funny "planet" instead of "plant." Toroca 18:32, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I don't see a need for a rewrite. It looks accurate to me. If it's "hateful" to tell the truth about something, then sure, it's hateful. But I see it as honest, instead. Toroca (talk) 02:56, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling

message: Plot synopsis appears to be based on the 1985 American edit, "Godzilla," rather than the original 1984 Japanese Film "The Return of Godzilla." 68.38.29.93 (talk) 14:11, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Synopsis
Talk:Half Moon Investigations

message: *It says the book was released in June 2006 (rather, will be released), but I'm holding it in my hand right now, and it most certainly isn't June. --Thrashmeister 00:33, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release Date 

message: Do we really need every character in the list? There are a lot, and most are so minor they don't really add to the article by being there. (Also, doesn't April Deveruex's comment count as a spoiler?) Ayries 15:18, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Character List

message: It says that the book is American!!! This is a complete lie, it's 100% Irish and the UK should be included too, but the author of the book is not even slightly america, so it should be taken down.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.149.129.189 (talk) 19:14, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It was published in the US first. I have clarified the infobox which focuses on the first edition information. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 16:52, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: American?