Talk:Nuclear artillery

message: The proper name for 'nuclear artillery' shells is AFAP, Artillery Fired Atomic Projectile.
Elde 07:51, 31 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  AFAP 

message: I think that the Atomic Annie has enough information around it to be made into a full-sized article. AllStarZ 14:23, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Atomic Annie

message: I think the text needs re-organising to follow either a time line or to group calibres together, eg 203mm before 155mm.
230mm was not a 'specialised' howtzer, it was a standard one (initially M115 towed, then M110 SP) although some armies only used it dedicated to the nuclear role.
I'm also fairly confident that the W33 yield information is wrong but don't want to say more.  Incidently I think W33 was 'build to yield', the required yield was actually assembled in the field, the weapons were not held in an assembled state and unlike some (later) weapons the yield was not 'dialed'.
Projectiles also had a M number as well as the W number for the weapon. It should probably also be stated that they were all designed for airburst.
Nfe 11:27, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: W33

message: What is the source for the novel assertion that 'nuclear artillery' means the nuclear projectiles?  This is certainly NOT the terminology used by those Western nations that had/have nuclear artillery.Nfe (talk) 01:53, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nuclear Artillery

message: Nuclear short range missiles is not nuclear artillery. Or change name of the article or do not write spare Gnomsovet (talk) 23:35, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Short range missiles consisted on arms several NATO armies in artillery subdivisions but were Short range missiles rather then artillery and on agreement 1987 subjected to liquidations, but Nuclear artillery and nucleus projectiles no.For example 1st Cavalry Division ("First Team") uses tanks but A1M1 not horse. ;)Gnomsovet (talk) 14:05, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

text: Artillery have gun barrel or other the tube, usually metal, through which a controlled explosion or rapid expansion of gases is released in order to propel a projectile out of the end at great speed. But missile lanced from missile pad is missile.Gnomsovet (talk) 03:32, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

text: Read INF 1987. All Pershing and BGM-109G Gryphon was liquidated on this agreement. In 2001 USA have done attempt to break this agreement within the framework of project GERAGnomsovet (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 03:14, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  short range missle is not artillery 

message: Landmines? Jesus Christ. The article mentions these near the top but there is no further discussion of them. Is this really true? If so it needs a source in the article, and some elaboration would be even better. Thanks. Old Man of Storr (talk) 20:33, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nuclear landmines 

message: North Korea can't manage to get a successful nuke blast under ideal conditions in a static test, and we're supposed to believe they have a functional miniaturized ruggedized warhead that can be used in an artillery gun?
Someone has been drinking the Kim-ade.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.127.152.206 (talk) 07:26, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  North Korea?   

message: From the article "use in an 8-inch-diameter (200 mm) artillery shell." 8 inches is 203mm. I can't see anything wrong with the convert command used, but the conversion is off. Seems the command goes 25x8 instead of 25.4x8, maybe someone with a bit more proficiency with the command could look into this?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.8.5.95 (talk) 17:43, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. (Hohum @) 22:26, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  convert error