lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Moodiesburn

message: The section on the Auchengeich mining disaster seems to have been moved from the Auchinloch article. That article is currently in :Category:Coal mining disasters in Scotland, :Category:1959 disasters in the United Kingdom, :Category:1959 in Scotland and :Category:1959 mining disasters, although as I have noted on its talk page as it now makes now reference to the disaster it is questionable whether it should still be in them. However should this article now go in these categories? An alternate possibility would be that a separate article on the disaster could be started if someone had the resources to create it. I would welcome thoughts on this. Dunarc (talk) 20:50, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't know a whole lot about the disaster or its location but a quick look shows the colliery was just to the west of Moodiesburn, and the monument is located there too. If there was no other significant settlement between the mine and Auchinloch it would be OK to mention it in its article and no doubt there was a few miners at Auchengeich who were from Auchinloch and other nearby villages, but geographically and culturally there's no doubt in my mind that it 'belongs' to Moodiesburn. So I have removed the cats and photo (also on Moodiesburn) from Auchinloch, but I don't know if it would really be appropriate to add the cats to the general Moodiesburn article either. An alternative (something of a bodge job, not sure if it would be officially approved of, but anyway) could be to create a redirect for Auchengeich mining disaster or similar to hold the categories. At present, a standalone article with just what's in the Moodiesburn section would be pretty weak. Crowsus (talk) 01:43, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks Crowsus. I agree with the approach you have taken and think there would need to be more on the disaster for either a redirect or a separate article. Dunarc (talk) 20:25, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Auchengeich mining disaster and categories
Talk:Maziacs

message: Public Domain version of Maziacs for Atari ST is to be found in the archive "Diskette AM 111" at http://www.deltalabs.biz/atari-pd-serie-am-101.htm --Friedels (talk) 12:52, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maziacs for Atari ST 
Talk:Arts of Iran

message: You are missing major categories of Iranian art from this page including theatre, dance. If this is not a page about these other things and is strictly about Iranian visual art perhaps the title of the page needs to be amended? Jooojay (talk) 07:38, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it should be Arts of Iran - plain "art"=visual art on Wikipedia. I will probably move it if no-one objects. Somewhere we need an actual history of Persian art, which this isn't. Johnbod (talk) 17:28, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Subjects are missing from the Iranian Art page
Talk:Florida Lotto

message: The Florida Lotto page should have the game's logo. 216.179.123.52 17:20, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

message: Hello, 
I redirected (or merged) Florida Lotto to Florida Lottery. 
Thanks! ~Corkythehornetfan (talk) 02:42, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: REDIRECTED [[Florida Lotto]]
Talk:Prodrive F1

message: On June 12th, we may well find out that Prodrive's application to the 2010 Formula One world championship has been rejected, and we'll end up trimming this down and re-merging with Prodrive. The team doesn't exist yet. Making a separate article seems to assume it will become an F1 team, and that's nothing more than speculation. Spute (talk) 21:43, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's mainly a historical thing. Prodrive was selected as the 12th team for the 2008 season, so it seemed fairly likely that they would compete and hence fairly reasonable to create an article. But then they didn't compete in 2008. From memory we considered/discussed deleting the article during 2008, but there was a chance that they might compete in 2009, so we thought rather than delete the article and then possibly have to recreate it a short time later, we'd let it stay until we saw whether they would be competing in 2009. Which (as we now know) they aren't. I suggest waiting until June 12 - if they're on the list for 2010 then we should keep the article; if they're not, then we should merge it back into Prodrive. DH85868993 (talk) 22:42, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this article really necessary?
Talk:Cajeme

message: Do we really need that enormous list of all the municipal presidents?  It seems like trivia to me.  Wouldn't economic and social information be more important?Vogensen 17:36, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This is not a list of "politicians" but of municipal presidents, that is, chief executives of this municipality. It is 100% relevant although you're welcome to add more information on economic and social information. --Vizcarra (talk) 05:15, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: List of Politicians too long
Talk:UCLA Bruin Marching Band

message: The USC Trojan Marching Band performed in both the LA Coliseum and the Rose Bowl on Septemeber 23, 2000.  After the USC vs. SDSU football game at the Coliseum, the entire band boarded buses for the Rose Bowl to play for the premiere of Disney's Remember the Titans.
Item should be removed from trivia, as it is false.
Dschwart 17:12, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  False Trivia item 

message: There needs to be a third party reference.  en.wikipedia is not a reliable source (see WP:RS).  --Rocksanddirt 20:42, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding the Sudler Award 

message: * The band has new unforms, lighter blue color at the Sept. 20 football game. Ucla90024 (talk) 17:59, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Uniforms

message: Suggestion to add the artist to these songs since they have more than one artist's version.
* Jungle Love
* We're Not Gonna Take It
* Movin' On Up
* Can't Stop
* Stronger
Forkemdevils (talk) 19:49, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: UCLA Tunes

message: Need to open https://uclaband.com/history/detailed-history/chapter-09/ to identify copied text. Automated comparison tools don't work as UCLA page delivers text via javascript. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 20:33, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  1111172534 copy violation
Talk:Cygnus X-3

message: In the second sentence which reads "Although it is only the third brightest x-ray source in the constellation after the famous Cygnus X-1, it is much further away on the far side of the galaxy and is obscured by intervening interstellar gas and dust near the galactic plane," does the second it refer to X-1 or X-3?
:It refers to Cygnus X-3.  Cygnus X-1 is about 7,000 light years away and its companion star HDE 226868 is 9th mag (ie, bright), while Cygnus X-3 about 30,000 lt-yrs distant, and so heavily obscured by interstellar dust and gas that no object is visible at all except in the infrared. Wwheaton (talk) 20:07, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Ambiguity

message: This page has improved substantially since the refimprove tag was added 2008-May, and a number cites have been added. I am removing the tag. If you disagree, please use the fact tag for explicit instances.
Robsavoie (talk) 01:26, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations 

message: For a non-expert like me, this recent one-sentence section is a non-sequitur. After re-reading the entire article and still finding no previous reference to V1521, I finally spotted it in the infobox. This should be made much clearer, but I won't have time to work on it for a while.  Perhaps Marshallsumter can take a look? Robsavoie (talk) 15:33, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  V1521 

message: Is there an objection to include a paragraph about the theory that ancient cultures were aware of the cygnus system as a unique place in the cosmos?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.53.73.41 (talk) 17:20, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: No, not until it can be buried at the end of a massive article, insignificant as the fringe theory that it is.  Maybe not even then.  Lithopsian (talk) 14:59, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The Cygnus Mystery" by Andrew Collins 

message: Paragraph 4 begins with the following sentence: "It has also received attention because it is one of the few sources of ultra-high-energy cosmic rays, with energies in the 100 - 1000 TeV range" with a reference to the following page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultra-high-energy_cosmic_ray The latter one defines ultra-high-energy cosmic rays (UHECR) as particles with a kinetic energy greater than 10^18 eV, which I believe is correct, see, e.g., http://uhecr.sinp.msu.ru Since 1 TeV = 10^12 eV, the above range 100-1000 TeV equals to 10^14-10^15 eV, which is far below energies of UHECRs. Thus, either the energy range must be fixed or the reference to UHECRs omitted.
More important, in case an author really means that Cygnus X-3 is "one of the few sources of UHECRs", a reference must be provided since I believe not a single source of UHECRs is currently known for sure, see, e.g., one of the latest reviews on the subject: http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.0575
213.131.12.28 (talk) 12:30, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I reworded that sentence. Ruslik_Zero 07:17, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A minor mistake (typo) concerning energies of cosmic rays
Talk:The Road To Audition

message: This is a poster-child for why tv episodes should be redirected, including practically every single one oft he "elements to avoid" that are listed below as part of the episode guideline. If this is substantially rewritten with an eye to out-of-universe style, focusing on the critical reaction, and eliminating the
* Trivia sections: 
* Quotations:
* Lists of featured music or song lyrics:
* Technical errors and continuity issues ("bloopers" or "goofs"):
then it should indeed stand alone. Until then, it violates WP:EPISODE and should be redirected. and WP:EPISODE is, given the extent of fancruftcreep, a hugely important guideline. Eusebeus 17:51, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have been involved with the WP:EPISODE guideline for a sustantial amount of time. Thanks, Addhoc 17:54, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That clears it up, thanks. Eusebeus 17:55, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: REDIRECT

message: In case no one noticed (which I know you didn't) the review process has started, and this episode is the first (sorry that you get to be the guinea pig) and it would be good for all regular editors (and any passerbys) to follow the link here for the discussion.   BIGNOLE   (Contact me) 23:01, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Pssst
Talk:Economy of Western Sahara

message: The Activist PR type listing of very Scandinavian grocery store that ostentasiously indicates it's not buying X, Y or Z from Western Saharan territories is not encyclopedic. Nor are unverified emails cited by activist websites. It's trivia. A paragraph discussing cessation of business deals where W. Saharan products are suspected to be involved is encyclopedic. The present text is Agit-Prop. (collounsbury (talk) 23:27, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non Encyclopedic Trivia 

message: This article has multiple issue, primarily its not WP:NPOV and the sourcing is to one site Western Sahara Resource Watch which describes as an activist group to campaing against corporations working for Moroccan interests. Gnangarra 13:55, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  WSRW 

message: Why would an area where solar energy could be developed profitably continue to produce ALL its electricity from fossil fuels? 
However, in the article, we read:
Desertec is an energy project launched in Munich in 2009, consisting on the use of solar and wind technology in the Sahara desert, with the aim to provide that energy generated to African and European countries.
In April 2010, a Desertec spokesperson confirmed to the English newspaper The Guardian that the project will not be placed in disputed Western Sahara, saying: "We want to confirm… officially that our reference projects will not be located in the West Sahara. When looking for project sites, Desertec Industrial Initiative will also take political, ecological or cultural issues into consideration. This procedure is in line with the funding policies of international development banks."Maung, Z. Solar giant Desertec to avoid Western Sahara. The Guardian. 2010-04-23
Now if any other new electricity generator contributes from renewables at least 1% of the electricity that is consumed in Western Sahara, the electricity consumed there is no longer completely (100%) drawn from fossil fuels.  Hasn't that happened yet, in the face of the SDGs?  I suggest that this article should be updated. MaynardClark (talk) 22:44, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Energy sources 

message: I read through the above, and I'm still not sure about the precise COI concern--is the worry that someone who posted here was a member of the activist group cited several times in the references? I'm going to try to remove some of the activist citations and replace them with news, but in any case it seems a little redundant with the neutrality warning. So I moved the latter up to the top and removed the former for now. I will work a bit more to try to improve this issue, too. FloridaSammi (talk) 19:03, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI warning
Talk:Raghuraj Pratap Singh

message: A new section in name of "Allegations and Controversy" has to be created
The below source from (Tehelka Magazine, Vol 9, Issue 16, Dated 21 April 2012) can be sourced and put out in the wiki article for inline reference.
* The Raja Who Stole From The Poor  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.178.178.19 (talk) 22:57, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: New section to be created
Talk:Nordish race

message: this article should not me merged with nordic theory because the nordish race is a term coined by a white nationalist and not an anthropoligist. Richard mcculloch coined the term nordish race and he is not an anthropoligist and has no related qualifications and is a self confessed white nationalist and he aims to nordicize the british by ignoring theyre mediterranean element. Nordish race is based on geographical origins, nordic race is based on physical similarities thus they are based on totally different criterion and thus cannot be linked or merged. Nordic race is used and was invented by anthropoligitsts, nordish race was invented by a white nationalist who is not an anthropoligist.
:It seems this distinction between Nordic and Nordish is even confusing to the editor above. Anyway, we both seem to agree on the distinction to be made between an anthropologically oriented article and a politically oriented article. What's in a name! Indeed, Nordish race is coined for political reasons and belongs fully to Nordic theory. I suggest a simple redirect would do, but to be sure you could check for some valuable additional information I missed so far (maybe the origin of this denomination Nordish race would need extra emphasis in Nordic Theory). Rokus01 18:30, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Spring-Ford Area School District

message: I know that this incident happened, but to protect the school's legal rights and to keep this content up there, whoever added this chunk of information needs to cite the information from a reputable source (not a blog for instance).  If you don't know how to add footnotes, look it up, the wikipedia people are very friendly when it comes to their own formatting.
Joeperry85 18:33, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation of "Controversy"
Talk:Create (TV network)

message: A network is a system of connected nodes.  ABC, CBS, NBC and FOX are all networks of local broadcasters, who are generally free to show other programming, such as an important local news story, or to decline carriage of a show they find unacceptable for reason of content. 
Most cable channels are NOT networks. There is one, count 'em, one program sent out by the channel, and cable companies act as CATV - community antenna television - utilities.  
I realize that many cable channels use "network" in their name, such as CNN and ESPN, but that's like Pennsylvania calling itself a commonwealth.  They are really a state, and even the state constitution refers to elected *state* officials, and Jerry Sandusky's source of fresh meat is NOT called "Penn Commonwealth University."
When not part of a title, the word "network" should be reserved for actual networks (and Create IS one) and "channel" used for other cable content providers. 2601:D:A380:C9:1D54:2D36:C0EA:5614 (talk) 09:52, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Network vs Channel

message: , I am not sure how you consider this sentence to not make sense: "Some were taking a channel independent." Independent station (North America) doesn't carry a network. Since a station now has multiple channel it doesn't make sense to say "independent station" unless the whole station is programmed independently. The next sentence gives an example of this occurring with WETA: " A well known station, WETA, dropped Create on its .2 channel for an independent how-to channel in January 2012." Spshu (talk) 12:53, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your reply. The grammar of that sentence still doesn't sit well with me. I'm restoring it in the text, but if you could add anything that makes its meaning a bit more clear, that would be great.Jessicapierce (talk) 17:42, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: , OK, I took a shoot a rewrite, give me some feedback if you would. Spshu (talk) 21:32, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: That makes a great deal more sense now. Thank you for taking the time to do that! Jessicapierce (talk) 22:00, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Independent
Talk:William Hulme's Grammar School

message: I changed the translation of the motto slightly. As it was told to me on my first day at WHGS, the motto is, inter alia, a pun on "whom/Hulme".--ukexpat 02:14, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Motto 

message: I love the table on the organ. Has anyone got any more detailed information? --OhNoPeedyPeebles (talk) 20:41, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: The School's organ

message: Is the Kim Booth listed in the Notable alumni section, the Tasmanian politician or another Kim Booth? – ukexpat (talk) 15:06, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Fuck knows --95.146.238.186 (talk) 19:42, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the insightful reply. – ukexpat (talk) 20:02, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kim Booth 

message: The pictures of the buildings need to be smaller.----Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 07:12, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You can fix that yourself. – ukexpat (talk) 14:43, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Buildings, images of

message: At present there is a discussion relating to the renaming of this category. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at this discussion page. Please note that the discussion is not a majority vote so contributions should be based on Wikipedia policies and independent sources. Cjc13 (talk) 13:29, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category:Old Hulmeians renaming
Talk:USNS Salvor

message: I'm not certain that I agree with recent changes to the "Operational Accomplishments" section. I saw the note indicating that items in list format might be better rewritten into prose. I also suppose that a narrative operational history that includes the items from the list in context might be a better way to present the information that was listed there (something that I have been working on writing), but I don't know that I agree with the idea that is is better to rewrite a list into what is really still just list in paragraph format. I do like the new towing table, however. 
--Pamcwill (talk) 18:43, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Operational Accomplishments 

message: Some images that could be used in this artice, or a Safeguard class article:
Image:Towman_2-4_rs50_drawing.jpg
Image:Salvman_12-17_ars50_bow_lift_arrangement.jpg
Image:Salvman_12-18_ars50_bow_stern_lift.jpg
Image:Salvman_6-30_beach_gear_rigged_ars50.jpg
Image:Towman_l-2_ars50_tow_machine.jpg
Image:Towman_4-4_tow_room_fairlead.jpg
Image:Towman_2-1_ars50_bulwark.jpg
Image:Towman_4-26_norman_pins.jpg
Image:Towman_4-22_towing_bows.jpg
Image:Towman_4-25_stern_rollers.jpg
Image:Salvman_8-29_beach_gear_on_ars50.jpg
Image:Salvman_9-4_pulling_beach_gear_tug_combo.jpg
Image:Salvman_8-5_pulling_with_direct_winches.jpg
Image:Salvman_8-18_beach_gear_ground_leg.jpg
Image:Salvman_8-25_spring_buoy_ground_leg.jpg
--Pamcwill (talk) 18:56, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images for future use 
Talk:USS Sampson (DDG-102)

message: Any such mention in the article should have a spoiler warning.  I haven't read the book yet, but many crew members are listed in the "Prinipal Characters" section.  So expect a fairly major role. Will (Talk - contribs) 10:09, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Might not be sufficient enough for WP:MILPOP. -  theWOLFchild 15:39, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  DDG-102 appears as the USS James Greer in the [[Jack Ryan]] novel ''Commander in Chief''
Talk:Babbitt, Nevada

message: I created this entry based upon research I did for a local Museum in Hawthorne, Nevada, over a period of several years. I'm not sure how to cite sources for this research, as I was the researcher, and much of the material here is not somethinbg I can point to, as much is based upon aerial photographs, old blueprints, interviews, and material from a small local paper whose archives are not available digitally.
MrNeutronSF 18:54, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I lived in Babbitt, Nv. from 1947 to 1951, at 117 Saratoga Ave. The one thing that is not mentioned is the Town center. It was located east of the Bowling Alley. The Town center consisted of a Bank, Barber Shop, Post Office, Grocery Store, Drug Store and Beauty Shop.75.170.67.12 (talk) 16:36, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Town CenterI 

message: The Town Center was called "Babbitt Court" and is listed as such in contemporary phone books (see references). The entry does contain references to the facilities.
As to what was north or east of what, Babbitt was aligned so its short axis was along a NNE line. As such, the commercial shops section was NNE of the Bowling Alley, which was itself NNE of the Community Center and the facilities that flanked it. The Theatre was ESE of the community center. As the blocks were not aligned with respect to North-South, stating one block is east of another can lead to error.MrNeutronSF (talk) 06:50, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Babbitt Court and NSEW directions 

message: The following is the exact location where the facilities were located: The Bowling Alley, between Ranger Ave & Lexington, and 20th and 21st St., facing Lexington. Babbitt Court was located between 20th & 21st street, and Lexington Ave & Essex Ave. The Bank & Barber Shop faced 20th Street, Post Office, Grocery store, Drug Store and Beauty Shop facing Essex Ave. The Movie Theater was located between Ranger Ave & Saratoga Ave,and 21st & 23rd street as 22nd street did not go thru. g.anderlohr, 1947 to 1951  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.125.115.27 (talk) 19:06, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Babbitt Court
Talk:J. Storrs Hall

message: Why did he completely and totally abandon sci.nanotechnology? 71.165.163.42 05:39, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Elmer H. Wene

message: This article was started using public domain information from the Biographical Directory of the United States Congress.  LarryQ 18:56, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled