Talk:Condominium (international law)

message: *
That was not quite the same: On 14 May 1912 Russia and Norway agreed that Svalbard Island is to be neutral territory (article now sort of a stub; word from Latin neuter, 'neither', in stead of by both). On 9 February 1920 the World Court awarded sovereignty to Norway. 
14 August 1925 Formal assumption of sovereignty by Norway (Svalbard Territory). Fastifex 17:45, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, just wasn't sure of its exact status. I tend to think of it as Norwegian territory, with Russian tolerance. Mind you, Russia was in a state of civil war in 1920, so could hardly put a good case. --MacRusgail 20:38, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Svalbard]]?

message: Why are there asterisks after Masstricht and Northern Dobruja? I cannot find anything on the page to indicate what they mean - and wikipedia doesn't generally use asterisk footnotes, if that's what they're supposed to point to. - DavidWBrooks 13:02, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Getting no answer, I have removed them. - DavidWBrooks 11:21, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Asterisks?

message: I can't find explanation neighter in this article, nor in Aland. Alinor 06:53, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  why Aland is listed as principality? 

message: I don't think this is true:
* * The Tumen River is a condominium between China and North Korea.
Roadrunner (talk) 19:33, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tumen 

message: The former New Hebrides was an Anglo-French condominium, with executive formally appointed by the King of Spain, which was problematic during the Second Spanish Republic and Francoist period.  This should be covered.  75.216.20.178 (talk) 22:19, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The New Hebrides 

message: I've removed Brčko District from the list of current condominiums, because the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republika Srpska are not sovereign states, and the article itself defines a condominium as "a political territory (state or border area) in or over which two or more sovereign powers formally agree to share equally...". The Office of the High Representative also dismisses the idea that Brčko is a condominium. There are, however, reliable sources that describe it as such. Some of these, however, clarify that it is a "quasi-condominium" or a "substate condominium" at odds with previous use of the concept. Cordless Larry (talk) 09:26, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brčko District 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Condominium (international law). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111004005739/http://www.minefe.gouv.fr/fonds_documentaire/notes_bleues/nbb/nbb270/entente_cordiale.pdf to http://www.minefe.gouv.fr/fonds_documentaire/notes_bleues/nbb/nbb270/entente_cordiale.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:59, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Does the service tunnel qualify, as it's shared between the UK and France? REH11 (talk) 18:15, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Channel Tunnel]] 

message: The article defines a condominium as "a political territory in or over which multiple sovereign powers formally agree to share equal dominium and exercise their rights jointly, without dividing it into "national" zones."
Then the first example the article lists is Antarctica. Antarctica is divided into national zones, and thus, by this definition, is not a condominium.
Clarification needed - either the definition needs to be adjusted for accuracy, or Antarctica should be removed from the list.
Jade Phoenix Pence (talk) 06:31, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you are correct, for the reason you give and for other reasons in the Treaty. The 'condominium' article tries to get around this by using the term 'de facto condominium', which is a catch all phrase open to opinion. But there are enough parts of the Treaty that clearly do not envisage joint sovereignty that even calling it a de facto condominium is stretching it. Roger 8 Roger (talk) 07:39, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

text: Dispite the various territorial claims, none of those territories have sovereignity. All relations in Antarctica are jointly govereigned under the Antarctic Treaty System, which makes it fit the definition of a condominium. Lgnlint (talk) 07:34, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is Antarctica really a "condominium" if it's divided? 

message: :
Should Switzerland be removed from the first sentence? —Tamfang (talk) 22:02, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bodensee