Talk:List of pharmaceutical companies

message: An Archive of threads pre-dating 2014 (10 years as of 2024) appears at Talk:List of pharmaceutical companies/Archive before 2014.  The topic headings in that archive are:
* Source
* External links
* Organization of this page
* New User-space page created
* Things to do
* Big pharma
* SinoPharm
* Bayer Healthcare
* Where is entry No. 31?
* Total Revenues less than Net Income?
* Conflicting data
* Pfizer / Wyeth
* Page title
* Missing companies?
* Redundant lists?
* Merge with Pharmaceutical Industry?
* current news regarding China
Regards --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 01:36, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Talk page Archive 

message: This is a comment regarding whether revenues made by non pharma subsidiaries of companies should factor in in the ranking of "largest" pharmaceutical companies.
Johnson & Johnson might be the largest healthcare company in the world, but a large fraction of the revenues are not made by pharmaceutical products but cosmetics or healthcare products like lotions or mouthwash.
This skews the perspective in this list if you compare it to companies like Roche which don't sell any consumer products. 
I mean, is Neutrogena lotion a pharmaceutical product? Clearly not.
According to the German Wikipedia page JNJ is only No. 8 worldwide when it comes to pharma only sales.
I think this has to mentioned on the page somewhere that total revenues are listed and not necessarily pharma revenues.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.3.50.254 (talk) 07:27, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pharmaceutical / Healthcare profits ranking 

message: What would other editors think about trying to get this page protected so only auto confirmed users can edit? It's tedious - correcting the number of red links introduced (mainly by IPs) and its clear the edit warning doesn't work.. XyZAn (talk) 10:06, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Getting this page protected 

message: I do not think that the current list provides any benefit over a category based on current inclusion criteria and format.  The main inclusion criteria is that the company must have an article; the main format guide is that a listing should be a simple link to the extant article.  If either the inclusion criteria and/or format were revised, I think this list would add value.  For instance, if the inclusion criteria were to be expanded to include listings which have a reliable source attesting to their status as a pharma company. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 04:22, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Benefits vs. Category? 

message: Kindly add the following pharmaceuticals company 
UK MEDICA LIMITED Ukmedica (talk) 07:37, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 16 December 2017 

message: We Narwhal Data Partners Provide Wide Range Of Pharmaceutical Email List 183.82.17.253 (talk) 05:52, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Narwhal Data Partners has no article on Wikipedia, so can not be added to the list, as per the page note.  Red Jay (talk) 08:39, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 18 May 2018 

message: Please, include ESTEVE PHARMACEUTICALS S.A. in the list
Thnaks,
Xavier Xcodony (talk) 09:57, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Kuru (talk) 11:11, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 3 August 2018 

message: There is a Company Name Missing In the list
NAme of the Company is : DWD Pharmaceuticals Limited
Located in mumbai Sk5994 (talk) 04:47, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: there is no article with that name. If the company meets our notability guidelines write an article and reopen the request. Danski454 (talk) 10:13, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 16 August 2018 

message: Add Deurali-Janta Pharmaceuticals in the D section list of the pharmaceuticals company. It is one of the oldest and renowned pharmaceuticals company of Nepal
Also, it has a wikipedia and the link is provided below
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deurali-Janta_Pharmaceuticals Rockers495 (talk) 11:14, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Done – Thjarkur (talk) 01:52, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 15 August 2019 

message: Nordic Nanovector 31.208.144.17 (talk) 12:36, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: does not appear to have a Wikipedia article. aboideautalk 16:23, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 14 September 2019 

message: * Kris Pharma (2017– ) 1.39.196.55 (talk) 10:35, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Does not have a Wikipedia article yet – Thjarkur (talk) 12:45, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 7 March 2020 

message: Please add the following two companies
* Boehringer Mannheim (1817–1997)
* Buchler (1856– )
* Amersham plc (1946–2003)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Buenator (talk • contribs) 14:28, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 25 February 2021 

message: Add "Almus Pharmaceuticals" as a brand. It has been around since 2003 and now provides Walgreens Boots Alliance with their generic medication. Current valuation is over $1Bil USD.
 GIB19734 (talk) 11:15, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: Needs to be notable enough for a wikipedia article. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 11:24, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 1 October 2021 

message: Please add Kissei to the "Alphabetical listing—Active firms"before Kite. Tyler.weirick (talk) 07:47, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: casualdejekyll 19:45, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 3 February 2022 

message: Vial (Vial.com) 136.49.55.149 (talk) 18:25, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: WP:WTAF Cannolis (talk) 18:38, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 14 February 2023 

message: Reglagene Inc.
www.reglagene.com 64.196.201.13 (talk) 16:12, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: Reglagene, see WP:WTAF Cannolis (talk) 19:18, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 5 June 2023 

message: Not clear whether Corbyn, Stacey & Company should be added to the 'defunct' list.  What do people think?  My reasoning for addition is that it's description includes "firm of manufacturing ... chemists", which is kind of the definition of a pharma company in the small-molecules-are-king era.  Regards --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 01:25, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corbyn, Stacey & Company 

message: Wondering whether there would be consensus for inclusion of International Therapeutic Proteins in the list.  In past incarnations of pharma companies, the products of this company would fall under the "natural products" category, not a term used very often these days for big pharma units.  Thanks for your thoughts. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 01:54, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  International Therapeutic Proteins