Talk:The Blueprint

message: I don't think an encyclopedia should be labelling something so subjective as a music album as the 'best' album by Jay-Z. Remove it.
:I agree. The reception section reads like an ad. I'll try looking over this when i have time. Kulukimaki (talk) 19:29, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: The best?

message: songwriters for the second song, TAKEOVER include the members of the band THE DOORS (even the late jim morrison). probably the songwriters should only include those who prepared THIS song and not those who wrote the song from which a sample is taken to create this one.
John Densmore
Robby Krieger
Ray Manzarek
Jim Morrison
24.232.74.200 (talk) 23:02, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: songwriters

message: :Image:Girls, Girls, Girls (Jay-Z).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:33, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Girls, Girls, Girls (Jay-Z).jpg

message: :Image:Song Cry.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:54, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Song Cry.jpg

message: How do we know that the misspelling of renegade was indeed a mistake and not Artistic licence? I can't see any reason for it to be deliberately spelt wrong but is it safe to assume it was actually a misprint/typo? Is there another source which spells it correctly? -- Borb (talk) 18:06, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renegade/Renagade 

message: Transcription of NME review (Kessler, Tim. 41. October 6, 2001) using Google News Advanced Archive search:
Dan56 (talk) 12:52, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: NME review

message: Transcription using Google News Advanced News Archive Search. The Washington Post (Fields, Curt. T.06. September 21, 2001) review of The Blueprint (2001):
Dan56 (talk) 08:18, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: The Washington Post review

message: i added the article but somehow someone deleted it and redirected it to here. its not the same album.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.177.76.242 (talk) 06:17, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  BP Collectors Edition 

message: I check pages listed in :Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of :The Blueprint's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "SWE":
From Eminem discography: 
From Jay Z discography: 
Reference named "SWI":
From Kanye West discography: 
From Jay Z discography: 
From Nas discography: 
From Bad Meets Evil: 
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 05:41, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphaned references in [[:The Blueprint]] 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on The Blueprint. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.rollingstone.com/artists/jayz/albums/album/216039/review/6067649/the_blueprint
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091215050757/http://blog.rhapsody.com/2009/12/100-best-pop-albums-of-the-decade-20-11.html to http://blog.rhapsody.com/2009/12/100-best-pop-albums-of-the-decade-20-11.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080517051324/http://www.stylusmagazine.com/reviews/jay-z/the-blueprint.htm to http://www.stylusmagazine.com/reviews/jay-z/the-blueprint.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:32, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on The Blueprint. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for https://www.rollingstone.com/artists/jayz/albums/album/216039/review/6067649/the_blueprint
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050425010646/http://www.exclaim.ca/index.asp?layid=22&csid=1&csid1=2325 to http://www.exclaim.ca/index.asp?layid=22&csid=1&csid1=2325
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120604051250/http://www.rollingstone.com/music/lists/500-greatest-albums-of-all-time-20120531/jay-z-the-blueprint-19691231 to https://www.rollingstone.com/music/lists/500-greatest-albums-of-all-time-20120531/jay-z-the-blueprint-19691231
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:23, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Scott Storch. No he does NOT appear on this album. However he does appear on The Blueprint 2: The Gift & The Curse. BUt NOT "THE BLUEPRINT"!
I have the original album, I have looked through the credits back and forth, up and down, inside and out. NO Mention of Scott Storch. Give credit where credit is due people. The Blueprint 2: The Gift & The Curse YES The Blueprint NO!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.133.97.9 (talk) 08:42, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scott Storch...? No! 

message: I believe this album was the first “thing,” song or otherwise, to enter the National Recording Registry that was created beyond or in the year 2000.  I believe we should include that in the article, after the last sentence on how it was inducted in 2019. 2600:1700:AA98:4010:80D5:C732:FAED:1FF9 (talk) 19:12, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  First Piece of Art from the 2000s to be Entered in the National Recording Registry