Talk:Night Watch (Discworld)

message: I removed this paragraph added by MartinRe because I don't think that the Coates character is important enough to appear in a synopsis and because I don't see what's so surprising (or important) about his "From how far back?" comment. (The image in my mind here is 'Fierce warrior from ancient, barbarian times' which has been used for Vimes-in-action in previous books.) 85.182.9.134 12:13, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair point. The image in my mind when I read Coates's comment originally was a "you too?", but I may be reading too much into it. I think Coates has an interesting part in the book: he's the only one who knew the real Keel; he was a key revolutionary; he is unfraid of Carcer, argueing with him about harming young Vimes; When he resigns, Vimes/Keel talks to him about "revolutions always come around again" (circle of time reference?). Coates also dies in the battle just like Keel/Vimes. He's also very sure ("Yes. I can.") he can imagine what it would be like if Carcer was allowed to stay in this time. (understanding or foreknowledge?) I've have wondered whether Coates is a mirror of Vimes/Keel, only his task was to make sure the revolution took place correctly. All in all, probably a little too  tenuous to have in the article, but I still feel there's more to Coates than meets the eye. MartinRe 15:56, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Ned Coates

message: The following piecew is removed, since it was added by an anon with many vandalism edits, hence this addition requires independent verification.
:Young Vimes believes Vimes to be the real Keel, allowing Vimes to teach Young Vimes the lessons for which Vimes idolised Keel. Essentially this means that Vimes taught and idolised himself, not Keel. 
:The novel climaxes in the Revolution, hinted at since the start of the book. Vimes baracades a few streets to keep people safe from the rebels, but the baracades are pushed forward gradually during the night to encompass the surrounding streets, until Vimes is under control of more of Ankh-Morpork than the rebels.
mikka (t) 19:40, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I beg to differ. Lu Tze specifically tells Vimes in the book that Keel DID teach Vimes. The actual explanation is spread over several pages in my edition, but suffice it to say that Vimes is in a parallel universe of sorts. Hence, Vimes did not teach himself, but another incarnation of himself in this parallel universe. Watercleave (talk) 11:02, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Addition by a vandal

message: I see from the history that this was cut in the middle of a large and beneficial edit, but why is the book no longer regarded as a parody of Les Miserables?  While the modified version ("A great deal of the plot is inspired by civil uprisings like the Paris Commune of 1871 and comparable ones, as depicted in Les Miserables, for example") is correct, the book has very strong ties to Les Mis in particular (see LSpace's comments) - while many are coincidental, the references to loaves of bread and the inverted definitions of justice imply a much stronger link. I'm not going to put it back in myself, but if this convinces anyone else then they can. Tyrhinis 10:49, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That entire section (along with most of this article in fact) is original research and should be sourced or expunged but I don't have the time or the energy to do either at the moment but just something to bring up. Cat-five - talk 02:52, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Moreover the novel is rather somber in tone, especially for a Pratchett novel.  Pratchess knows how to write parody, and this isn't an attempt to do so. --Anticipation of a New Lover's Arrival, The 03:39, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parody of ''Les Mis'' 

message: "It is stated that the event which caused Vimes and Carcer to be sent into the past was a major temporal shattering, the implication being the cause of Vimes going through time is that he was caught in the explosion at the same instant the glass clock struck and time froze in Thief of Time." That's a bit original, eh? Vitriol 16:56, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Only a bit... they talk about a lightning bolt hitting a clock shop in Cunning Artificers and stopping all the clocks in the shop at once, which would tie in very strongly, and Lu-Tze's dialogue when he's explaining the situation to Vimes suggests that, if it's not happening as part of the fallout from TOT, then the Men in Saffron have managed to have another serious event pretty damn fast considering their previous record of competence. The fight that LZ and Lobsang find on the way to Jeremy's shop (where LZ warns him not to touch the hovering arrow) isn't mentioned, true, but Ankh-Morpork's a big city, I'm sure they can have more than one arrest at once.  Tyrhinis 17:13, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If you really want, you can cite the Annotated Pratchett File for support for the above statement. --Kerowyn  Leave a note  19:21, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Buh? 

message: Somebody has remarked on Talk:Life on Mars (TV series) that Sam Tyler and Sam Vimes seem to have remarkably similar experiences.  I don't think it's likely that one influenced the other, however, because the basic concept of Life on Mars seems to have been roughed out in the late 1990s, but the program wasn't made until the mid-noughties, whereas Pratchett seems to have conceived and written this 2002 novel in his usual timescale. --Tony Sidaway 23:06, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I second this line of inquiry.  LoM was written (originally) in ~1998, but not broadcast 'til 2006.  Meantime, NW was published in 2002.  Either it's a remarkable example of parallel development, or someone talked to someone.  I wonder if Pratchett's been asked about it? Srain (talk) 09:04, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Well, considering that Life On Mars has now turned out to be something completely different...Lots42 (talk) 23:01, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Life on Mars (TV series)]]

message: On the strength of what is this classified as Libertarian Science Fiction? I think it's miscategorized.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 136.159.187.3 (talk) 19:10, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: On the basis of it winning the Prometheus Award in 2003, presumably. 205.167.180.130 (talk) 20:52, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Whatever you may think of some libertarians, the Prometheus has gone to a surprising range of novels by a variety of authors, by no means all Randroids or even Friedmanites. --Orange Mike  |  Talk 19:43, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Libertarian Science Fiction

message: :Image:Night watch discworld.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 00:58, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Night watch discworld.jpg

message: There's currently a serialised radio adaption on BBC Radio 4 - Does anyone have any info on that that can be added to the article? (Not a big diskworld fan, myself, but I was hooked after the first episode of the Radio play) 81.149.182.210 (talk) 22:00, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: BBC Radio Adaption

message: In what year did the Glorious Revolution of the Twenty-Fifth of May take place? Can we tell? --Orange Mike  |  Talk 19:41, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The Discworld uses a strange method of named years, and not numeric dates, as far as I can tell. FOr example, most of the books take place in the Century of the Fruitbat. Watercleave (talk) 11:08, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  What year? 

message: I'm currently planning to rewrite and source this article, if anyone could provide any sources that'd be great, I'm specifically after stuff on development of the book, rather than reviews. Cheers! Rehevkor ✉ 18:09, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re write 

message: The last paragraph of the lede section, about the cover illustration of the British edition, included the following sentence:
: Kidby pays tribute to the late artist by placing him in the picture, in the position where Rembrandt painted himself.
I have changed it to 
:Kidby pays tribute to the late artist by placing him in the picture, in the position where Rembrandt is said to have painted himself.
removing the tag and adding a link to Talk:The_Night_Watch#comment_on_trivia_item. 
That section discusses the hypothesis of Rembrandt's self-insertion:
: First trivia item states: "Rembrandt cleverly included himself in the painting. In the background, slightly above and to the left of the Captain's head, all that is visible of him is an eye, a nose, part of a forehead, and his painter's beret." Agreed that trivia does not belong; though artist's self depiction in famous painting might fit in narrative and not be considered trivia. However, no citation is provided and the curatorial materials at the Rijksmuseum note that *some believe* this figure to be a self portrait, but experts are not in agreement about it.
The entire Trivia section has since been removed, sometime after being renamed "Other Representations". --Thnidu (talk) 02:51, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kidby tribute to Kirby 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Night Watch (Discworld). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121016210347/http://locusmag.com/SFAwards/Db/Prometheus2003.html to http://www.locusmag.com/SFAwards/Db/Prometheus2003.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061115000919/http://www.locusmag.com/SFAwards/Db/Locus2003.html to http://www.locusmag.com/SFAwards/Db/Locus2003.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:51, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: background and publication section has rembrandts picture of a nightwatch which says in its memo: "The book's cover parodies Rembrandt's The Night Watch." this seems to be an erraneous assumption. the cover (picture at the top of the article) is a close remake, could be called a tribute, or reminiscence, or epigonism, whichever suits you but, has nothing satirical or caricaturistical about it, without wich theres no reason to call it a parody. 89.134.199.32 (talk) 20:04, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  wrong assumption