lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Adam d'Ambergau

message: Hello, 
While I'm elated there is a page on d'Ambergau (wikipeia needs more entries on early printers, not to mention a quality history of printing, especially its formative years) I find this entry, though erudite, a little obscure. There is very little relating d'Ambergau to the history of printing, especially in the role of compositor, leaving a vague impression on the reader. Could the author (clearly a bibliophile) expand, as I have no knowledge of this aspect of printing and I'm backed-up on my own hackneyed research. Thank you Vonsnip 02:45, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Synthesia (video game)

message: *This isn't even the right word the correct spelling would be Synesthesia or Synaesthesia
So I'm removing the following:
Synthesia is the medical term for the rare ability to detect numbers and letters as colors, as well as in their traditional form. Its cause is not known, but some neuroscientists suggest it might be due to the brain combining multiple senses (for example, those of sight and sound, or taste and smell) into larger, all-encompassing senses, permitting a person with synthesia to perceive the world in ways most people cannot.
and redirecting to Synaesthesia where all of this information is already J E Bailey 02:45, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: * Should the features that are included in the current version be listed on the wiki page of Synthesia?
--DC64  — Preceding unsigned comment added by DC64 (talk • contribs) 03:39, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Features

message: * This article implies that for computer software, "open source" and "commercial" are mutually-exclusive.  Such is not the case. Pmocek (talk) 07:58, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Closing source 

message: *The article states, that it is for "as well as Linux using Wine".
Wine is not an emulator (strictly speaking) and it's impractical and misleading to list emulated platforms as done here. After all, almost every Windows application can be run on Linux using Wine with a little work. I don't know if there is some guideline or policy regarding the matter, but until someone better educated in this subject says otherwise, I'll remove this section.
DAud IcI (talk) 06:08, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: On Linux

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved to Synthesia (video game).. Per consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 13:54, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Synthesia →  – Since the article Synthesia (company) was created on March 4, pageviews have increased to levels similar to this article. I'm not sure, however, if it should be disambiguated as "software" or "video game". –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 22:31, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 7 October 2023
Talk:List of New Zealand–related topics

message: I've started this article to collect most of the major NZ related articles in one place. There are several existing countries (and some states and other areas) with these already. I've fairly happy with the format and sections now but plenty of content still to be filled in etc. Countries that seem to have good versions already include: The Philippines, Romania, Singapore, Spain , The UK, Taiwan and Finland. -  SimonLyall 02:48, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Wa$ted! is a New Zealand reality television show, which shows families their impact on the environment, and helps them to become greener in their daily lives. Maybe the article should be moved to "WA$TED!". -- Wavelength (talk) 07:35, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wa$ted! (orphaned article) 

message: What about Invasive species of New Zealand origin and Invasive species in New Zealand? Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 08:14, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: More Topics about NZ-related topics?
Talk:Sweet and sour pork

message: I think "Sweet & Sour Pork" (as opposed to chicken) is authentic.  The Americanized version uses a bright red sauce made from ketchup which is not-authentic.  The authentic version is a clear sauce and it served with some sort of Chinese greens (spinach like).  In Japan, this dish is known as "su-buta" or vinegared pork.
right now this is a poorly written recipe. if it was a well written recipe it would be a candidate for transwiki. there ought to be enough information out there for an article (history, variants, etc.) but i think that would involve replacing most of the current content. Nateji77 02:59, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course as it is a Cantonese dish, it is not on the traditional menus of restaurants specializing on cuisines of other Chinese provinces.  It is on the menus of restaurants in Hong Kong like the Regal Chinese Restaurants, Yung Kee, or on a more mass market level, Hsin Kuang Restaurants.  I have seen recipes on Cantonese cookbooks published in Hong Kong, and described as "common dish" such as The Food and Travel Weekly published by Hong Kong's Next Media.  http://opinion.atnext.com/viewthread.php?tid=873, http://motor.atnext.com/moPrintContent.cfm?article_ID='%23%2CW%3ERO_*!P%20%20%0A&CAT_ID=18, http://etw.atnext.com/template/etw/art_main.cfm?iss_id=629&sec_id=1000841&art_id=10022328 . (Some links require subscription) --JNZ 23:10, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Norwich University

message: Is Mack Hall missing from the article?
https://events.norwich.edu/mack_hall_962
https://www.jonesarch.com/projects/reinvigorating-the-academic-campus-core/
https://fffinc.com/project/mack-hall/
https://www.engelberth.com/portfolio/norwich-university-mack-hall/
(note, most images in these links are copyrighted and not free) 98.230.196.247 (talk) 14:28, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Buildings
Talk:New Union Party

message: The NUP is now engaged in something it calls the "Campaign for a Working Democracy."  I'm not exactly sure how to handle this in light of the article's content, which discusses the DeLeonist nature of the party; the current website of the NUP doesn't mention the word "socialism" or the names of Marx or De Leon.  This was launched with much advertising by the NUP and the suspension of their paper.  I'm going to begin substantial revision to reflect the changes; anyone who can fill in details would be very welcome to do so.  Cadriel 01:40, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Campaign for a Working Democracy
Talk:List of fictional people named Carter

message: The content here also appears in the article Carter in a section for fictional people.  It is identical, in fact.  
It is unlikely that two versions of the same list will always receive parallel updates, so it would be wise to have the information in only one location and have other locations point to it.  Toward that end, I am going to turn this page into a redirect to the page Carter.
Tobycat 00:23, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Duplicated Information
Talk:CPU core voltage

message: I rewrote this article and tried to use as much as I could from the previous one.  I dropped the references to "average" VCore because I didn't think it meant anything or referred to anything specifically.  There are plenty of modern processors that fall out of the 1.0 - 1.5 volt range, both higher and lower.  I think a list of VCores of CPUs (popular, modern, whatever...) would be a good addition to this article.
I know an Athlon 64 Winchester core runs at 1.4 Volts with a heat output of about 60 watts and an old Athlon XP 1700 Palomino runs at 1.7 volts with a heat-output of about 75 watts, Hi i am Pyro Computer Dude i made the above post and i am the original poster of this (used to be ip 24.bla bla bla)
:Right, that data would be good to have in an organized fashion.  I don't think we can make any categorical statement about the average CPU until we have data to referrence.  Also, don't you think the info about tom's hardware's overclock would be more in-place in the overvolting article?  Similarly, there's already a discussion of the problems with overvolting in the overvolting article... Psyno 19:46, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe in passing.  The article needs to be cohesive and shouldn't try to go beyond its scope..  It could be mentioned that the vcore is determined from an external source, and that that source maintains the voltage.  I still think the reference to the THG overvolt would fit in better on the overvolting page.  Psyno 23:07, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Please can someone merge VCore into this article?  As of right now, the VCore article is very underwhelming, but does have some good links.  I think there should be a merge and redirect. - JustinWick 01:20, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge VCore into this article 

message: This article needs more citations.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.117.96.229 (talk) 21:54, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations 

message: I suggest merging dual-voltage CPU into CPU core voltage.
While they are not exactly the same thing,
they are closely related so I think a single encyclopedia article can cover both topics,
with a single sentence describing the connection between them:
"A dual-voltage CPU is a CPU where the core voltage is different from the I/O voltage."
--DavidCary (talk) 14:40, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge 

message: I read the dual-voltage section and I saw that it was very outdated information. I added a new section that expands on the dual-voltage CPU notion to multi-voltage CPU.
I suggest that the article should be about CPU voltages in general, and not just CPU core voltage. Since there aren't any wikipedia articles about all the other voltages in a CPU and the article already contained the dual-voltage CPU section that also introduced other CPU voltages apart from the core voltage. It does make sense. Bonnom (talk) 12:58, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changing Article from CPU Core Voltage to
Talk:Lim Bo Seng

message: I doubt the Guy was named Onishi Satrou, Japanese doesn't have consonants tha stand without a vowel standing behind. So i think the name should be satou, a common japanese surname
I think that the guy the previous person mentioned was 'Onishi Satoru'. I think that 'Onishi Satrou' was a spelling mistake. xxx 09:54, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Apparently, his name was Davis, not Davies. Tualha 12:57, 10 July 2005 (UTC)

text: The Japanese marshal's name's written as 大西覚 in Kanji, and is read as Ōnishi Satoru. Lonelydarksky (暗無天日)  contact me (聯絡) 08:08, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Onishi Satrou/ Onishi Satoru? 

message: Please merge any relevant content from [ Lim Bo Seng's Downfall] per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lim Bo Seng's Downfall.  Thanks. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-08 21:24Z
SO SAD for limbo seng...
if the world was not having war in that long period of time , it would been peace ..
i had feel that he is a good and brave heroine of the world.
Should have take my hats off me  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.186.12.215 (talk) 06:50, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: seems merged. robertsky (talk) 19:58, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from [[Lim Bo Seng's Downfall]]
Talk:7 July 2005 London bombings memorials and services

message: I am going to work on this in a few days. I know that President Bush and other leaders visited British embassies. I will also list the half-staffing dates and nations. Zscout370 (Sound Off) 04:23, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Plan

message: The translation of the sign in Rome is wrong. I'm italian, but i'm not sure of the most correct translation. It says (literally) "Province of Rome. We are near (emotionally) to the suffering in London" It don't say that the palace is close.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.218.8.80 (talk) 12:12, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Translation
Template talk:2005 London bombings

message: Why are there links to pages that don't exist? You can't just expect that people will create them. joturner 04:48, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Future editors: I put the original in Template:Jul7Bom/Temp. --Dhartung | Talk 06:32, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Too Many Links

message: My thinking on future splits for the article runs to these: a "before" events article; an "after" events article; possibly a split-off of the investigation article; an "effects" article; and eventually, I suppose, a "rumors & misinfo" article. At this time I think that will cover what people are interested (by what I see being added to the main article). --Dhartung | Talk 06:32, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Template expansion

message: John, if someone objects to an edit, the usual thing is to take it to talk, not to keep on reverting to the new version. The image is clearly relevant and powerful. SlimVirgin talk|contribs 18:28, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, the lighting was poor because the person taking the image foolishly didn't think to take a professional camera and lighting with him in advance. But there you are, it's all we have. If you want to remove it, please seek consensus for that, but don't keep edit warring over an objection. SlimVirgin talk|contribs 18:49, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

text: Time magazine used it as one of their images of the year in 2005, by the way, which further suggests that very few would agree with your assessment of it. SlimVirgin talk|contribs 18:52, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

text: In 2005 the image brought some sight of the aftermath of the terror to the public, it really isn't a harrowing image though - has nothing on that 7/7 photo with the guy holding the cloth over the burning women's face. It is really only suited to the main bombings article in an appropriate section with the caption, "stuck 7/7 victims in broken down carraige." John Cengiz talk 19:03, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: John, please stop removing this. Someone proposed it for deletion because you'd orphaned it. SlimVirgin TALK|CONTRIBS 14:30, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It's somewhat rude of you to keep on reverting, John, and without discussion. BRD doesn't mean you keep reverting over objections. SlimVirgin TALK|CONTRIBS 14:55, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I have moved the image to the "7 July 2005 London bombings" article, where it has some purpose and context. John Cengiz talk 15:30, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Image
Talk:Thunder Force (video game)

message: If you happen to wander into this page: I've been pondering this for a little bit and I've come to realize that the more common spelling of the name is "Thunder Force" instead of the current "Thunderforce" and I wonder if the article name should be changed to  "Thunder Force" and the body of the article changed accordingly. What do you think, is this a good idea or am I overanalyzing and does it even matter? --- EXMaster 11:52 pm July 9, 2005
Ignore the above, I decided to go ahead and change the title. I don't think this is that popular of a page so I figured it wouldn't affect much and the "Thunderforce" spelling will just redirect now. If for some reason this change really pisses you off, then you can go ahead and change it back. (P.S. I'm going to list my sources for the article rewrite here soon, that should be up tomorrow or so.) EXMaster 02:51, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of space pirates

message: Two things:
*I didn't know whether to put it first name last name or last name, first name, since there weren't anyother entries with both first and last names.
*If Humma Kavula is a former space pirate by time he is seen, would he still be in the list?
Brian Sisco 04:56, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. - Centrx 01:07, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Ditto. I'm recommending this for deletion. --Awiseman 20:36, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Questions

message: This article badly needs cleanup. I'm going to remove everything without some kind of link to another Wikipedia page as a start. --AW 16:15, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: Why, exactly, are Reavers listed as "space pirates" in this list, while the main characters (the entire crew of Serenity, either directly or by association) are guilty of at least one act of space piracy every episode? Steamboat28 (talk) 14:28, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reavers

message: Should include the "Raiders" from Babylon 5 - no direct article to link to alas.
203.56.94.11 (talk) 04:45, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll look into that one too. --Historyday01 (talk) 06:30, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Raiders

message: 2 whole episodes centered around them, why no mention? 75.118.170.35 (talk) 16:10, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  My Life as a Teenage Robot 

message: Should The Outrageous Okona be listed here? If Han Solo qualifies, I don't see why not.
Also cf. http://en.memory-alpha.org/wiki/Pirate
(Have uguise heard of Star Trek? It's pretty cool, you should check it out.)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.101.56.72 (talk) 01:49, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Star Trek 

message: Get your act together and block that unregistered "Buttpiratry" user from vandalising this page.
I gave him a warning on his talk page that disruptive editing would get him banned. I hope it works. LoneWolf1992 (talk) 22:13, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hey, Admin! 

message: In The Martian, the character of Mark Watney gives an explanation of how he is technically a "space pirate" because he commits what is legally an act of piracy by commandeering a vehicle from another country without permission, while on another planet. I think we should include this. bd2412 T 03:56, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: bd2412, thanks for mentioning that! There is an entry now, but I haven;t added in that YouTube video yet, so I'll have to do that. Historyday01 (talk) 06:28, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  I don't know that the YouTube link is necessary in the article. BD2412 T 06:23, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps so.--Historyday01 (talk) 14:06, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mark Watney
Talk:Don't Be Cruel

message: In the article on the song "Don't Be Cruel," the statement "Presley reworked the Otis Blackwell demo and changed the music and lyrics, just as he did to other compositions by Blackwell. Hence the reason he received co-songwriting credit." is not verified.  Where is there proof for the statement?  My understanding has always been that Presley and/or his people took half of Otis Blackwell's writer's share of credit and royalties and probably at least 100% of the song's publishing as a form of "kick back" to have the song recorded by Presley - a not all that uncommonpractice then and now, though considered by many as completely unethical.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Peaches5 (talk • contribs) 03:16, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Information that is not verified 

message: On a Wikipedia page on the category of anti-war songs, "Don't Be Cruel" is on the list. Huh? Also, it's categorized in one of the boxes on the bottom of the "Don't Be Cruel" page as such- "Anti-War Songs".
Could someone please explain how "Don't Be Cruel" could be an "anti-war song"? It must be someone's idea of a joke. I don't get it. - Runt (talk) 13:28, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: How is "Don't Be Cruel" an "anti-war song"?

message: In a interview with Elvis Australia Freddy Bienstock, Elvis' music publisher, had the following to say about Elvis receiving songwriting credit on records like All Shook Up, Don't Be Cruel,...
"Although Otis Blackwell wrote 'Don't Be Cruel', 'All Shook Up' and 'Paralysed' himself, the label says 'Blackwell - Presley'. Elvis, it appeared to me, was doing nothing new: Al Jolson used to claim credits on songs he didn't write. Freddy disagreed 'It's not quite the same thing. In the early days. Elvis would show dissatisfaction with some lines and he would make alterations, so it wasn't just what is known as a 'cut-in'. His name did not appear after the first year. but if Elvis liked the song, the writers would be offered a guaran tee of a million records and they would surrender a third of their royalties to Elvis'."
Read the complete interview here: http://www.elvis.com.au/presley/freddy_bienstock.shtml  —Preceding unsigned comment added by DavidDoelen (talk • contribs) 20:56, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Songwriting Credit
Talk:Woodward's Building

message: New guy here, sorry I missed the first delete discussion. The Woodward's article is almost entirely cut and pasted from HBC's website.(see: http://hbc.com/hbcheritage/history/acquisitions/retail/woodwards.asp) Yes, it's well written, as people pointed out, but they paid someone for that quality. It's not very encyclopedic either, and anything worth saving from that could very well be integrated with this one. Just some thoughts. I don't know how to nominate something for deletion, so if any veterans out have the answers...Bobanny 02:18, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Delete Woodward's article

message: What's the controversy around the Woodward's demo? Big, ugly building blown up - isn't that a good thing? Seems kind of silly to even mention the controversy if the article isn't going to say what it's over.Bobanny 19:14, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: ...and will be incorporated into the rebuilt version...Bobanny 19:29, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversy?

message: I made a picture, which IMO gives a better overview of the destruction []. The license is as liberal as possible, thus it's not a problem if it needs to be cropped or otherwise edited.--85.126.128.10 16:10, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: destruction picture

message: Please stop removing the link to the primary source of information on the squat episode of Woodward’s unless you explain your reasons. The squat has been recognized, as the article now states, as providing “the political impetus to save the building". 24.85.240.167 (talk) 04:41, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: If you can find secondary source for Woodsquat, by all means include it. Wikipedia follows very strict guidelines on what's a reliable source and what's allowed as an external link. I see there's tons of reliable sources on the Woodsquat's media section. If you can cite one of them, it will be fine.  єmarsee  • Speak up! 04:57, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclusion of Woodsquat 

message: The overapplication of the lower-case "rule" in Wikipedia is an ongoing problem.  In this case, because of the apostrophe, the linguistic ambiguity of "Woodward is building" is present, but also the equivalent for other buildings in Vancouver would be the "Rogers building", "Standard building", "Wall centre", "Vancouver block", "Bentall centre", "Orpheum theatre" etc.  Or more widely, "Buckingham palace", "World trade centre", "Empire State building".Skookum1 (talk) 16:08, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see this move being controversial at all. Just go ahead and move it. Indefatigable (talk) 22:38, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  This was a case in which to be bold, so I did. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 15:07, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Should be "Woodward's Building"

message: It seems like this article is written mostly to shine a positive light on the new development, instead of focusing more on the history of it. It would be nice to see some pics of the building when it was fully intact, maybe when it was open. Irazmus (talk) 04:16, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of intact pics