lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Ha-Ha Brothers

message: I'm a little bit curious about Juumonji's scar and where it comes from. At first I assumed it came from when Hiruma beat the Ha-Ha Brothers up, but then I saw that it appeared on Juumonji's cheek for two panels before the beating. However, ONLY two panels. I'm thinking it's an error but if you look through chapter 1 of the manga you'll see that Juumonji clearly does not have a scar on his right cheek for many panels. Does anyone have any information on this or is it just an error on the artist's part?
EyeshieldsRWin (talk) 03:23, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Juumonji's Scar
Talk:Davis College (New York)

message: I have books that belonged to my late Aunt June Snyde. 1946-1956 would live to send somewhere. There are 11 books 2601:98A:4301:2410:C8B6:5502:45A6:7610 (talk) 16:37, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Roberta Sparkuhle 2601:98A:4301:2410:C8B6:5502:45A6:7610 (talk) 16:38, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Theologue books
Talk:Allison Silverman

message: I've edited the page to update her emmy status.  She was part of Colbert's writing staff that won in 2008, which would also presumably increase her nominations from the eight mentioned in the article.  Her emmy history can be found on her imdb site, http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0798881/awards - someone with more editing experience than I have will have to add the cite to the article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Modronlove (talk • contribs) 00:23, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Emmy
Talk:Mallory O'Brien

message: Last Name
The article claims that because we are introduced to Mallory before Leo and his wife divorce and that since Leo's wife uses McGarry it shouldn't be assumed O'Brien is her maiden name. Why not? Just because Jenny McGarry doesn't explicitly use her maiden name doesn't mean Mallory wouldn't for one reason or another, ie to avoid people realizing who her father is.
Spikethehawk (talk) 01:35, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Rearrangement reaction

message: I never liked how chemists treat atoms as little specs of things with well defined positions,energies and momenta. The part where it discusses fluid movement along the bond vs the arrow formalism ignores another mechanism that happens quite often. Tunneling. Its easy with a hyrogen and in fact many of the reactios that we were taugh inolve ,for example, the exchange of a proton with the solvent in fact are much simpler. Another example of the delocalized nature that protons can easily take on can be found in carboxylates. Considering heavy metal ions have been shot at a defraction grating and produced interference patterns, its not a stretch to expect that large multi carbon groups could do it under the right curcumstances.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.180.134.66 (talk) 20:28, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Tunneling
Talk:Order of Our Lady of the Good Death

message: — Assignment last updated by FinnMal (talk) 19:14, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Modern Brazil
Talk:Pericyclic reaction

message: I highly recommend editors to also consider consulting the book about Pericyclic Reactions written by Ian Flemming.
I also recommend editors to also consider consulting the two books produced by Francis A. Carey and Richard J. Sundberg about Advanced Organic Chemsitry. The two books are split into two parts "Part A: Structure and Mechanisms" and "Part B: Reactions and Synthesis".
Zyvov 02:06, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Carey and Sundberg 

message: I recognize that ene reactions are often classed as group transfers.  However, according to the Woodward and Hoffmann sense of the term group transfer (transfer hydrogenations from 1,4-cyclohexadiene and such), group transfers should refer to reactions with no net change in the number of sigma and pi bonds.  In contrast, the ene reaction forms a sigma bond from a pi bond.  For this reason, I've included them in the table as a basic reaction type, and corrected the bond changes involved in a group transfer to 0 and 0.  Incidentally, this process is not even mentioned in "Conservation of Orbital Symmetry" (probably because the correlation diagram approach is hard to apply to the ene reaction). 
I think it's debatable whether cheletropic reactions deserve their own category.  The net bond change is the same, and superficially, the orbital interactions are analogous.  However, there are unique issues arising from how to analyze trajectory and orbital overlap, so it's reasonable to consider them separately.
Does anyone have a good reference for dyotropic reactions and how to analyze them via the standard techniques (i.e., correlation diagram, frontier orbitals, aromatic TS)?
Alsosaid1987 (talk) 16:45, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cheletropic and ene reactions (and group transfer)
Talk:Department of Health (Philippines)

message: Anyone know what has happened to this?  It used to live on DOH website, but not now.  John of Cromer in China (talk) mytime= Tue 14:24, wikitime=  06:24, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Society of Public Health History (SPHH) 

message: Hai doc evening....pwde mag ask.pwde pah mka prenatal. 6months nah 49.146.39.12 (talk) 10:27, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mhars 

message: Local literature processed food 136.158.11.95 (talk) 04:28, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Research 

message: FACTORS AFFECTING FILIPINO FAMILY’S PREFERENCE TOWARDS ORGANIC AND PROCESSED FOOD IN DALIG- ANTIPOLO CITY 136.158.11.95 (talk) 04:28, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Research
Talk:Bike Caucus

message: --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 06:21, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: What merging? I already used that site as a source in the other article, I don't see what's left to merge unless you want to copy their mission statement word for word, or list all 164 members. What is still here that needs to be merged? --YbborTalk 14:29, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Which one is to die?  I see that BC has the shorter name than CBC, is made much longer due to its list, and has its sources in an improper style.  I think, however, that CBC ought to be the survivor because that names official, better publicized elsewhere, and more descriptive.  Jim.henderson (talk) 20:43, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Dream Pod 9

message: The subject of this article published four undeniably Notable games, is covered in Designers & Dragons, and was one of the largest game publishers in the 1990s. Notability is not temporary. Newimpartial (talk) 19:54, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  PROD removed
Talk:Fame Academy series 1

message: I've just been reading this article, and it turns out that the link Kevin Adams goes straight to an article about an American Lighting Designer. Right now, I am thinking of creating an article of him, but I attempting to find his date of birth, birth place, and most of the information of his career. Can someone please help me out on creating this article? (call the article "Kevin Adams (fitness coach)") Thank you for reading.--TPercival (talk) 16:27, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  About creating an article of fitness trainer Kevin Adams
Talk:Action! (programming language)

message: This is from old version:
:This allows great speed, but limits the amount of code that may be compiled.
All compilers have limits of code. I suggest delete this. Tdc6502 (talk) 05:23, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Programming 

message: * Several coders: in Atariki
* New graphics modes in new games: - Nowe tryby graficzne Atari po 36 latach (YouTube; PL; 2015)
* About making new games on Global Game Jam (fragment): Heaven 2015. Atari vs. Commodore feat. SOS & TDC (YouTube; PL; 2015)
Tdc6502 (talk) 03:58, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  References to "Action! today"
Talk:List of Auburn High School people

message: The article says that Auburn was the 77th best public high school and the 28th best non-magnet school in 2006 according to Newsweek.  Newsweek did say this (actually when I look at the Newsweek site I get 78th for 2006), but this is a misleading statistic for several reasons.  From 2003 to 2008, Auburn's ranking was 238, 211, 78, 299, and finally 376 this year.  So these rankings are not very stable.  Moreover, Newsweek's formula is a debatable measure of merit.   It calculates the number of AP exams (and similar) taken divided by the number of graduating seniors.  This does give you some rough picture, but it means that a school ranks higher if it lets students drop out, than if those same students graduate without taking AP exams.  It also takes no account of whether students do well on AP exams, only whether or not they take them.
The ranking by SchoolMatch is also questionable.  SchoolMatch gives credit to a school if its teachers are paid less, and if area real estate is cheap, but its students still perform well.  Again, their formula for student performance matters a lot, but this one isn't properly documented.  Even if the formula were sound, and even if the ranking were stable, how much praise does a school deserve for the situation that they have in mind?  It may be a logical reason to buy a house in the district.  But if students do well in a school that's run on the cheap, then maybe the students and their families deserve more credit than the school itself.
Auburn High is a fine school and it's nice to have this page for it.  But tossing around statistics loosely is a bad way to praise anything.  Greg Kuperberg (talk) 17:47, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  These school rankings are dubious
Talk:Banque du Caire

message: The bank has identified some proposed corrections and improvements to the article. They understand that they should not be making these corrections themselves due to conflict of interest issues, so requests that independent editors carry out the changes.
-Type: Egyptian private-sector bank
-Industry: Banking and financial services
-Products: financial services, consumer banking, investment banking, corporate banking,
SME banking, global transaction banking, financial institutions, -Net income: 2.5 Million
EGP.
In the head office section: the phone numbers need to be updated to +20222646401 and our
hotline is 16990.S Philbrick(Talk) 13:33, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested corrections
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/John Gohde 2

message: This case should be named John Gohde 2. --Kaypoh (talk) 02:43, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment by uninvolved [[User:Kaypoh|Kaypoh]]

message: Just looking at the provided diffs, I don't see anything worth making a case over here. -- Kendrick7talk 03:45, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment by uninvolved [[User:Kendrick7|Kendrick7]]

message: User:John Gohde is sort of the canonical, Platonic-ideal violator of WP:SOAP and WP:BATTLE. While his editing has been intermittent, it is marked not only by extreme disruptiveness and tendentiousness, but most recently by encouraging other editors to game the system by recreating deleted material (), canvassing (), and just plain lameness (, , ). Really, the community ought to be able to handle an obvious case like this with a simple indef-block/community ban, but given the background perhaps ArbCom is the best venue. Whether or not another 1-year ban is considered, there ought to be clear ArbCom-sanctioned zero-tolerance for this particular editor's shenanigans with swift escalation to an indefinite block, given how well-documented, refractory, and long-standing his poor behavior is. MastCell Talk 07:14, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Addendum: While it is encouraging that User:John Gohde is now willing to participate in this "mob, Iranian justice system", I find it odd to complain that WP:DR has been bypassed. This user has been the subject of 2 prior Arbitration cases, and the problematic behavior at the core of those cases remains demonstrably unchanged. I don't see what an RfC would conceivably accomplish given the level of refractoriness we're talking about here. MastCell Talk 19:10, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Statement by peripherally involved [[User:MastCell|MastCell]]

message: I've found John Gohde to be extremely contentious on Complementary and alternative medicine and Talk:Complementary and alternative medicine, where his behavior has definite ownership issues, and where he demonstrates a lack of understanding of WP:CON and WP:TALK (especially WP:AGF).  In my dispute resolution attempts with him, he simply ignored my concerns and instead choose to assume bad faith on my part and make accusations about my behavior.  Instead of following any regular dispute resolution methods, he started creating a page listing problems that he had with others, including myself. --Ronz (talk) 23:38, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: More sour grapes. -- John Gohde (talk) 15:02, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Statement by peripherally involved [[User:Ronz|Ronz]]
Talk:Ukrainians on the Soviet Union national football team

message: I found something in this version of the article: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ukrainians_on_the_Soviet_Union_national_football_team&oldid=559054414 that does not make sense. 
At the end of the section http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ukrainians_on_the_Soviet_Union_national_football_team#All-time_records , I found an "as of" that says [quote:] "As of 7 July 2013."   
It seems to me that either the month is wrong, or the year, or something.  Today is only 10 June 2013.  That "as of" date ("7 July 2013") is in the future. 
I do not know how to fix it.  Someone who knows the intent of that "As of 7 July 2013." entry, might be able to offer some advice. 
Just "FYI".  --Mike Schwartz (talk) 02:28, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "future tense" (?) "as of" date -- (does not make sense)
Talk:Season of the Witch (song)

message: Aren't there numerous metal songs with the same name, but completely different lyrics (if any lyrics)?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lLxmPOWmlJs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aIngvpxwWy4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nDkRPN1qKhs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WyzmrRKFdis
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LVydh48h3yY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QPmnykQXYHA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=snDaTXNOlYM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VJuHcYRho5w
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QSeGXkvVrZo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wHmLXxxx4e0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=laBjQrF4GQY
Conner Fields2600:8804:7500:15C0:3D3C:395B:F5B6:2B39 (talk) 23:04, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Metal Songs with the Same Name

message: See dissension above. There is a disagreement between editors, myself included, about a previously included Lana Del Rey section in the article and to what degree the information should be included in this article. Thoughts from other editors are appreciated.
Include
Don't Include
Include Revised Version
ThereWillBeTime (talk) 07:38, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfC on Inclusion of Lana Del Rey section 

message: The article currently states that the song was recorded AND released in September 1966.  Yet the US album on which it appears was released August 26, 1966, according to the Sunshine_Superman_(album) article.  So one or the other is wrong (if not both).
And it was extremely rare, in any event, for a song to be released in the month it was recorded in the 1960's, due to production schedules.  Can this be made more accurate?
Sojambi Pinola (talk) 16:27, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Recording and release date may be before September 1966 --inconsistent dates in Wikipedia 

message: "Season of the Witch" should be the title of this article, not "Season of the Witch (song)", and other uses listed under "Season of the Witch (disambiguation)".
Other uses are subsequent to Donovan's song, and most refer to it directly. Doug butler (talk) 22:12, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Primary topic
Talk:All-Pro

message: Hello! I would like to request an infobox for the All-Pro team in the National Football League.
The information that I would like it to have should be pretty basic, I just don't know enough about the coding.
I would like for this information to go on the page for each YEAR (for example 1999 All-Pro Team), and I can fill in the details after the fact. I would like to have the following information on it if possible:
*season = [nfl season]
*league mvp = [player], [position], [team]
*hall of famers (or HOFers) = [player], [position], [team]
*previous year = [previous year's all-pro team]
*next (or following) year = [next year's all-pro team]
That's pretty much all we should need. I mainly just need the "previous/next" option to easily navigate from year to year.
Once this is set up, I can copy/paste all the info going back to the beginning of time. Thanks!
Bill shannon (talk) 22:06, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox request

message: The All-Pro designation, while not officially sanctioned by the NFL, is generally considered a more prestigious honor than the NFL's official all-star designation, a Pro Bowl recognition: a minimum of twice as many Pro Bowlers are selected as first and second team All-Pro slots combined, and Pro Bowl selections often drop out (including all Super Bowl players since 2010), allowing a lesser player to also receive the honor by default,
The underlined sentence is confusing.  If for example, both the first and second AP teams have 5 players each, does this mean there are at least 2 * (5 + 5) = 20 Pro Bowlers?  Is there a source for this formula? Artificial Nagger (talk) 03:40, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It's likely WP:OR, but it might be somewhat close as 88 intitial players were selected for the 2022 Pro Bowl, before replacements were named for Super Bowl and injuries.—Bagumba (talk) 05:22, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prestige  

message: Honest question; why don't we cover the PFF or SI All-Pro teams, among others? The Kip (talk) 19:45, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: They would need to have independent coverage, whose mention on the page would not be considered WP:UNDUE. —Bagumba (talk) 01:35, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why do we limit it to solely the AP, PFWA, and SN?
Talk:Glasshouse (British Army)

message: I served in the British Army up until the end of 2011, and EVERYONE referred to the prison at Colchester as the Glasshouse. So the claim that this term is rarely used is not correct.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.245.167.51 (talk) 02:44, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur with the above. I served on joint operations with H.M. Forces in Germany and at Fort Lewis, WA (USA) many times during my (US) army career (1971 to 2001). Glasshouse was used very frequently. We Sustain Tjlynnjr (talk) 01:00, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  Agreed on the above comments and I have removed it because the text was copyvio anyway. The joy of all things (talk) 11:45, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
Talk:Don't Give Up the Ship (game)

message: This article needs a thorough scrubbing. For one thing, the title of the game is wrong - there is no published edition where the title ends in an exclamation point. The cover image should be of the first published version, the Guidon edition. Also planning to include a shot of Mike Carr running this game at Gen Con recently. Also warrants more Arneson - mentions of the unfinished "Ships of the Line" which was to be the campaign rules for DGUTS, more on the pre-publication editions, of Gygax and Arneson playing together in Arneson's Napoleonic campaign, etc. Just putting this as a courtesy in case anyone is watching and seriously objects to this plan.
Disconj (talk) 05:26, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Planning to redo this
Talk:Fando y Lis

message: Since it's an informative source (as questionable as it is), shouldn't the reason for the riot be mentioned as well?--178.168.50.2 (talk) 14:43, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cause of riot
Talk:Ford Model U

message: "automatic retractable behind."?  Trekphiler (talk) 15:40, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Nice butt
Talk:Clover Industries

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved to Clover Industries per WP:NOGOODOPTIONS.  Don't like it?  Propose something else, but I'm confident this is likely to stick. Kudos to  for the suggestion. (non-admin closure)   В²C ☎ 04:02, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Clover (dairy) →  – The South African company does not exclusively produce dairy goods, and the current title is also ambiguous with Clover Sonoma. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:20, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

text: Alt titleClover Industries natural disambiguation, a bit better Snowmanonahoe (talk) 18:48, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 25 April 2023
Talk:SS Ionic (1902)

message: Masts, sails and electric lights: From 1889 on, when Teutonic and the first Majestic entered service, White Star's ships' masts were no longer rigged to carry sail; the advent of twin screws was thought to do away with the need to carry sails.  Although she in fact had four masts, Ionic was not equipped with, and could not uses, sails.  Electric lights had also been standard on White Star ships for even longer; ships as early as Coptic (1881) were lighted by electricity.Mab819c (talk) 00:25, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled

message: The infobox says that the ship was scrapped in 1937, but the history section gives the year as 1936. Which is correct? Eastmain (talk • contribs)  07:30, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of scrapping
Talk:CNH Global

message: The statement that Claeys was the first  European company to produce  self-propelled combine harvesters is not correct. Bolinder-Munktell in Eskilstuna, Sweden launched its first self-propelled combine harvester, the  MST-92 in 1951, a year before Claeys. --Sigmundg (talk) 12:42, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The first European self-propelled combine harvester 

message: I am making a bold review of the page. Many content does not have a reference and the structure of the page itself is messy. Suggestions are welcome.
I will also try to fix the ossue with fair use rationale.Smagliola (talk) 18:28, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Bold review

message: This appears to be a company PR release. I cite the boring and comprehensive list of awards as an example. Only the company would know this information. There is little information that is not self serving and I suggest the article be identified for what it is. A CNH press release Nnoddy (talk) 10:34, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should this article be identified as a CNH publicity release. 

message: Fiat industrial no longer exists - it has been renamed CNH Industrial Itemirus (talk)  13:49, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: That's what I meant; since the assets of the two companies have been consolidated into CNH Industrial, we should merge the relevant contents and create a new article.--Itemirus (talk)  18:53, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

text: I've already created a stub: CNH Industrial.--87.16.237.202 (talk) 16:30, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Fiat Industrial]]