Talk:Hannibal (2001 film)

message: The bio section of the page claims that "This was the first movie Moore was actually required to fire a gun." and is even backed up by production notes, but Moore was in the 1995 Richard Donner Film "Assassins" where she fires a gun on screen twice.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.74.111.87 (talk) 13:52, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Julianne Moore's first time firing a gun? 

message: The categories place this movie in comedy categories!  Other than Hannibal Rising, this is the only of the Lecter movies I haven't seen, but could someone make it clear why this is considered a comedy? 71.243.181.204 05:55, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It could be considered a black comedy.--CyberGhostface 21:59, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  COMEDY??? 

message: Template: has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. --CyberGhostface 21:59, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  TfD nomination of Template:{{ucfirst:Hannibal Lecter films }} 

message: Recently, this article has gotten ridiculously long with unneeded information and atrocious spelling and grammar.  Can someone please do something about this?  I am working on grammar, but I may need help. Dr. Hannibal Lecter 18:48, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Length 

message: The very end of the film, which shows Hannibal on the airplane with his arm in a sling is supposed to be one of the biggest character revealing elements of the whole series.  It's implied that rather than cutting off Clarice's hand, he chopped off his own, which could be considered a display of his love for her.  Yet, this is conspicuously absent in the plot summary.  Would anyone mind filling it in? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Stottpie (talk • contribs) 22:27, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Or maybe just a thumb (cutting an entire hand to get out of handcuffs seems too stupid thing to do for someone as intelligent as Dr. Lecter)))  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.82.32.27 (talk) 03:27, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  More about the ending.... 

message: *Christopher Reeve was offered and turned down the role of Mason Verger, but he regretted it when Gary Oldman won rave reviews for his performance. Reeve then signed on to play reclusive . Virgil Swann in two episodes of the popular drama show Smallville.
*Although the character of Jack Crawford appears as a minor character in the novel, he does not appear in the film, although is mentioned in a deleted scene as having passed away between films.
*In a scene inside the Italian police offices, a television screen can be seen in the background with a game of soccer on. The match shown is not of Italian soccer, as one might assume, but is actually an English Premier League game with former Aston Villa player Julian Joachim clearly visible on the screens.
MasterA113 03:53, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed Trivia Section 

message: Krendler reads the postcard supposedly written to Clarice and then says, "Sounds like him to me." If you read the card, you can clearly (maybe you have to pause it) see the words "sounds like him to me" as the last sentence. Obviously that wasn't supposed to be on the card. I just thought that was interesting; I wonder if they put it there on purpose. 24.10.97.60 09:29, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Has anyone else noticed... 

message: This article easily fulfills the GA criteria with its extensive citing, comprehensive citing, and decent quality of prose. Suggestions for improvement: check the quotes in the Themes section and make sure the syntax/grammar/flow is correct - I wasn't sure the proper format for multiple quotations like that so I left them alone. --Meowist 04:10, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Passed

message: GA article huh! My days and stupid amount of hours working on this must have paid off then. From a "start" to "GA". Whataboutbob 13:17, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Thanks!

message: It should be joint origin from the UK, seeing as the director and main star are British
:I might be wrong, but I think country of origin is based on where the production company is located and where major production work is done.  A British director and star does not make a movie British, it just means they worked on a movie made elsewhere. -Etoile 17:12, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  UK 

message: I was surprised by the article's implication that the carousel at DC's Union Station was placed there because Ridley Scott requested it.  It seems more likely that the movie made good use of the "Turn of the Century" carousel, a temporary Union Station exhibit sponsored by The History Channel.  -Etoile 17:18, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Union Station Carousel 

message: :Image:Hannibal knife.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 10:39, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Hannibal knife.jpg

message: :Image:Ridanddino.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 23:11, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Ridanddino.jpg

message: :Image:Ridleygram Hannibal.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 23:36, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Ridleygram Hannibal.jpg

message: :Image:Clariceandhanniballift23.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 14:27, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Clariceandhanniballift23.jpg

message: :Image:Alovemoment562.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 07:40, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Alovemoment562.jpg

message: :Image:Krendler&Claricehannibal.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 03:12, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Krendler&Claricehannibal.gif

message: :Image:Julianneoncar45.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:37, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Julianneoncar45.gif

message: :Image:Pazzicafeshades.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 17:29, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Pazzicafeshades.jpg

message: The whole thing is absurd. Humans who eat human brain will get Kuru (disease) and certainly an educated man like Lecter would know this. 216.153.214.89 (talk) 18:05, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Not necessarily. My understanding is that the brain that's eaten must be infected with prions for the disease to be tranmitted. Most brains don't contain prions, so he's pretty safe. In the same way, not all people that eat cow brain get CJD (harldy any of them in fact), because not all cows have BSE. Furthermore the wiki artice on kuru  states that merely eating the brain matter is usually insuffient to cause infection. So all in all brain eating is pretty safe so long as one doesn't make a habit of it. Grcaldwell (talk) 11:58, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Safe for the person doing the eating, mind you. Lampman (talk) 18:25, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure what the point is of having this section at all since it's hardly relevant and entirely wrong. Shiggity (talk) 22:18, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brain eating? 

message: This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review.
The article is generally well referenced, with WP:RS. There are some issues with the structure of the article, and other minor things, that could still be improved:
*"Plot" – see tag
*"Cast" – needs discussion of individual characters
*Different quotation styles are used
*"It's not exactly a romance there is that element. There's that erotic element in the story. I'm told. Ridley says it comes across very clearly." – this quote needs a citation
*Gross – these number are almost always misleading, since they do not figure in inflation
*Metacritic and Rotten Tomatoes need refs
*"Differences from the novel" – this section is inflated and crufty
*I notice that a lot of pictures have been removed due to lack of fair use rationale. The article could really benefit from a picture or two.
Lampman (talk) 18:22, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA Sweeps 

message: There are entirely too many names in the infobox.  It should be reduced to the 2-4 legitimate stars, like Hopkins, Moore, Liotta, etc. ---RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 02:39, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Actors in infobox 

message: ... that is, the Blu-ray copy within "The Hannibal Lecter Collection."  Not sure about other releases, since this is the only one I own.  It probably should be mentioned as the article states Oldman decided to go unbilled and presumably did so in the theatrical release.  Shiggity (talk) 22:15, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gary Oldman is credited in at least one version 

message: To User:Dayewalker I added this section becuse it is actually useful it tells the reader of the chapters in the movie and provided ample detail. it does not encrouch on th eplot section. i added it as a sub- section, futhermore it is also hidden. wpuld you please suggest why this section should not be in teh article. 
 
Kind regards
User:InExcelsisDeo
:We do not go into chapter-by-chapter detail, nor do we generally put "in-progress" type content into an article, nor do we hide large blocks of in-article content. Please read WP:FILMPLOT and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (writing about fiction), and if you would like to work on content like this in an "in-progress" manner please do it in your userspace rather than in the middle of an article. --IllaZilla (talk) 03:33, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: thank you for that, i shall finish the section onmy user page then place it back. To --IllaZilla why is this section unwarranted please provide detail. thank you  — Preceding unsigned comment added by InExcelsisDeo (talk • contribs) 03:37, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Because it's indiscriminate detail. —Mike Allen  03:41, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

text: why must you answer a question with a question, dont reply that your question warranted further question. thank you  — Preceding unsigned comment added by InExcelsisDeo (talk • contribs) 03:42, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Please don't readd this - it will continue to get reverted, regardless.  We don't do that sort of break down here.  WP:FILMPLOT, WP:Writing about fiction, MOS:FILM all cover how we do detail plots in film articles.  If there are points in the plot that need to be expanded upon, we can discuss that.  If there are reliable sources covering some kind of analysis based on the DVD chapter titles (which would be odd since it was also release on VHS but ok) then that is also something that could be discussed.  But I can guarantee you that any similar section will be deleted, whether it is work-shopped in user space or not.  Millahnna (talk) 03:44, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'll echo the links above, InExcelsisDeo, please read those. A plot section should be a summary, there's absolutely no need for DVD chapters and excessive unsourced detail. Dayewalker (talk) 03:47, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It is also worth perusing WP:PLOTSUM too. Betty Logan (talk) 06:28, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added Chapters Section 

message: I understand the English and the Italian, but when in the film do we hear German and Japanese?  I do not recall any parts of the film that take place in those countries, no any characters who speak those languages, certainly not in any significant manner.  Unless someone tells me something different, I am going to remove these languages. ---RepublicanJacobiteTheFortyFive 15:12, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Looking back through the history I see that the languages were added by HenryShepherd last December without explanation.  So, I simply removed them.  If I am incorrect, as I said, someone let me know. ---RepublicanJacobiteTheFortyFive 15:24, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Languages in infobox 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on Hannibal (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930171355/http://comment.independent.co.uk/leading_articles/article253462.ece to http://comment.independent.co.uk/leading_articles/article253462.ece
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070225002414/http://archives.cnn.com/2001/SHOWBIZ/Movies/02/08/hannibal.review/index.html to http://archives.cnn.com/2001/SHOWBIZ/Movies/02/08/hannibal.review/index.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061018234328/http://www.screenwritersutopia.com/modules.php?name=Content&file=print&pid=116 to http://screenwritersutopia.com/modules.php?name=Content&file=print&pid=116
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070314204447/http://www.tracksounds.com/reviews/hannibal.htm to http://www.tracksounds.com/reviews/hannibal.htm
*Added  tag to http://www.classicfm.com/article.asp?id=223575
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070917122005/http://www.countingdown.com/movies/1203/news?item to http://www.countingdown.com/movies/1203/news?item
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071011214840/http://www.bfi.org.uk/sightandsound/feature/84/ to http://www.bfi.org.uk/sightandsound/feature/84/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041228083806/http://www.timeout.com/film/dvd/63664.html to http://www.timeout.com/film/dvd/63664.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:35, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hannibal (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090226192110/http://uk.movies.ign.com/articles/035/035937p1.html to http://uk.movies.ign.com/articles/035/035937p1.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:27, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hannibal (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070917042236/http://uk.movies.ign.com/articles/035/035935p1.html to http://uk.movies.ign.com/articles/035/035935p1.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:28, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified