lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Roman Catholic Diocese of Bunbury

message: Should this article and similar ones be renamed, eg to "Bunbury (Roman Catholic Diocese)" --Oscarthecat 07:03, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename

message: I agree - this would be more logical.  Good suggestion. Raymondwinn (talk) 16:45, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Agree with Rename Suggestion

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Melbourne which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 12:30, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: The Bishop of Bunbury (Roman Catholic) page seems to duplicate what is on this page. All other Roman Catholic diocese wikipages include their ordinaries as a section, and not as thier own page. Jherschel (talk) 10:41, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge discussion
Talk:New York State Route 9X

message: US 9X was almost certainly a map error in the NY Times. The same map shows US 1A and US 9A, while photos published a week later clearly show those as state routes. --NE2 05:47, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: In all likelihood, probably a typo. Will get as soon as I can. Mitch32(Wikipedia's worst Reform Luddite.) 22:20, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Error
Talk:Tangambalanga

message: I'm moving the rather unlikely pronunciation  here. Can anyone confirm? (My problems with it: only stressed on the 1st syllable, and 1st 'n' is pronounced as an "n" while the 2nd as an "ng".) — kwami (talk) 22:25, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It is certainly TAN(not tang)-gambə-LANG(not LAN)-ə. The town is often called "Tan-Gam" for short. -- Mattinbgn (talk) 07:38, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  pron
Talk:ASI

message: برنامه خیلی خوبی هرشب ما فقط به آن نگاه می کنیم و خیلی طولانی شده و اگر شد از این فیلم های ترکیه نمایش بدهید  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.185.149.209 (talk) 06:28, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Interstate 78 in New Jersey

message: This article is well written and has a lot of useful material.  Unfortunately, it doesn't quite meet the standards set at the various WikiProjects, or the exit list guide.  I'll get around to major rewrite in the next few weeks, any help in the meantime would be much appreciated. -- NORTH talk 07:09, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I completed the cleanup.  I took out some of the dates from the route description section because they made it too wordy and confusing, and would be more appropriate for a new "History" section.  Also, if we were to expand this article, the brief mention of the construction on the express lanes east of Route 24 could be expanded into a "Future developments" section. -- NORTH talk 08:59, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup tag
Talk:Warhawk (1986 video game)

message: You are invited to participate in Talk:War hawk#Requested move 21 May 2019 about whether War hawk should be moved to Hawk (foreign policy). R2 (bleep) 16:26, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[War hawk]]
Talk:ASX (disambiguation)

message: I suggest redirecting this page to Australian Stock Exchange, as thats what the vast majority of people will be looking for if they come to this page. We could then have a line at the top of that article that says something like 'asx redirects to this page. for other meanings, see this page'
Comments welcome. THE KING 04:34, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestion
Talk:Venture Church Network

message: This article could use some MAJOR revision. 75.92.62.160 (talk) 00:55, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:ATB

message: Seriously, is this german DJ really that well know that he should get the ATB page? I came here looking for the Active Time Battle page, and I'm sure more people come here looking for something other than Andre Tanneberg or whatever his name is than come looking for him. 76.226.137.145 (talk) 20:40, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should the disambig page be made the default ATB page? 
Talk:Spousal privilege

message: The UK section refers to both spouse and wife without clarifying which applies. In the case of a same-sex marriage, does testimonial privilege apply to both partners? The Wikipedia definition of “wife” explicitly states that a wife is female. This piece implicitly suggests the same in that it consistently refers to “she.”
Do husbands have testimonial privilege? If not, in a same sex marriage how is it decided who is the wife and who the husband.
== US only? ==
Yes, this US only. It is derived from the Common Law so it likely is shared with British law, although I am not certain. The question about children does not appear to have been answered by U.S. courts. The text of the rules is pretty clear so any young child that is able to testify (they just need to be able to understand the difference between truth and non-truth) will likely disqualify spousal immunity protection. I suggest that anyone citing the FRE or other rules of evidence paste in the actual rule if it is short. This one qualifies.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.80.180.70 (talk) 20:21, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it does exist outside the USA. For example, in the Netherlands it does exist for partners, children, and family 2nd and 3rd degree (art 219 wetboek van strafvordering, https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0001903/2020-07-25#BoekTweede_TiteldeelIII_AfdelingVierde_Artikel219) Teun Spaans (talk) 20:41, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Same sex marriages

message: Yes, this US only. It is derived from the Common Law so it likely is shared with British law, although I am not certain. The question about children does not appear to have been answered by U.S. courts. The text of the rules is pretty clear so any young child that is able to testify (they just need to be able to understand the difference between truth and non-truth) will likely disqualify spousal immunity protection. I suggest that anyone citing the FRE or other rules of evidence paste in the actual rule if it is short. This one qualifies.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.80.180.70 (talk) 20:21, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it does exist outside the USA. For example, in the Netherlands it does exist for partners, children, and family 2nd and 3rd degree (art 219 wetboek van strafvordering, https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0001903/2020-07-25#BoekTweede_TiteldeelIII_AfdelingVierde_Artikel219) Teun Spaans (talk) 20:41, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  US only? 

message: Shouldn't it be made clear that the actual existence of spousal privilege varies from state to state?  It's not a blanket thing across the US.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.123.141.244 (talk) 03:24, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: varies state to state

message: Is there a reason that this page has no citations and no "needs citation" tags? Raptortech97 (talk) 21:49, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations
Talk:Solar Dynamics

message: What advertising?  I personally know I don't advertise for anybody....  If this article was deleted--- how can I now even review the article I wrote to see what can be changed to remove the "Advertising" looking statements????
This page wasn't even brought up for discussion as far as I know to allow for changes to be made.  The REASON I created this article were two main reasons that were supported by a third additional reason.
One--- Solar Dynamics was given government-incentives (in the early years of the country) by the Barbados Government, and it was seen as one of the areas the "Father of the Nation" wanted to see as a way to propell the post-independence Barbados economy.  Secondly, I've also noticed that some Wikipedians are privately charting country articles (on a nation by nation process) Seen on either here -or- here. Some countries are starting to add a section on energy conservation.  As such, any stats in the article were merely statistics of what each of the 3 major Barbados Solar hotwater heater companies were claiming to have actually installed in the country. CaribDigita 07:33, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Clayton Counts

message: this does not comprise an article and does not meet Wikipedia rules for notability 
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by April Winchell (talk • contribs).
:(This was originally posted by Kurt Benbenek, who is a troll.  He used April Winchell's name, but is not her.  Kurt had his own Wikipedia entry deleted for lack of notability, and has since been posting as people in the outsider music community, such as Otis Fodder, Irwin Chusid, and Clayton Counts on the WFMU message boards, as well as many talk pages on Wikipedia.  He has also attacked several Wikipedia pages in the past.)
:The initial deletion proposal was made from a fake account, by someone who dislikes Mr. Counts.  It meets the Wikipedia standards for notability insofar as Mr. Counts has been mentioned in Rolling Stone, American Songwriter Magazine, the Boston Herald, the Chicago Sun-Times, the Chicago Reader, Lumpen Times, the Onion, E! Online, the Austin Chronicle, Entertainment Weekly, and USA Today.  I will get references up and expand the article.   
:TrevorPearce
I suggest you include these mentions, with reasonable quotes (i.e. not too long) and referenced. See Anna Svidersky and Mark Bellinghaus for examples. Tyrenius 16:56, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article
Talk:Grand Duke Boris Vladimirovich of Russia

message: Bold text
Why is Zenaida referred to as his "mistress"?. She was a widow and he was unmarried so surely this term is quite wrong.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.40.227.226 (talk) 20:54, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mistress 
Talk:Grand Duke Andrei Vladimirovich of Russia

message: This article should, by rights, be Grand Duke Andrei Vladimirovich of Russia, which was his actual title. I see someone has moved it, but Grand Duke Andrew is not correct. --Bookworm857158367 (talk) 17:05, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Russian royalty is frequently referred to by English names. Charles 17:47, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: But the most correct version of the name is Andrei, not Andrew. The style in recent years has been to use the Russian translation of the name rather than the English version of the name. I want to see this article moved back to Grand Duke Andrei Vladimirovich of Russia. --Bookworm857158367 (talk) 18:11, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Most correct according to you? Charles 18:28, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The books I've seen published about the Romanovs in recent years have used the Russian forms of the name rather than the English: Andrei instead of Andrew, Kirill instead of Cyril, Maria instead of Marie, etc. That's what I'm going on. It also seems more respectful to use the form of the name that is used in the country they were from. --Bookworm857158367 (talk) 19:00, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

text: Yep. All of the Romanov biographies I have from the last decade or so use the Russian forms of the name. --Bookworm857158367 (talk) 03:04, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of this article 

message: A mistress is a woman who has a continuing sexual relationship with a man married to another woman. Given that the GD married only once, how can he be said to have "married his mistress"? Ordinary Person (talk) 04:49, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the proposal was Move.  —Wknight94 (talk) 01:36, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mistress?
Talk:Ahmet Rıza

message: It seems to me that Ahmet Riza and Ahmed Riza are about the same person, although the overlap in the respective descriptions, apart from the identical names (the spelling difference is unimportant), is confined to two items: prominent membership of the Young Turks, and concern about the condition of Ottoman peasantry. There can be no doubt that :tr:Ahmed Rıza has the same subject as Ahmet Riza, although the birth year differs by 1: in both cases AR is named as being the publisher of Meşveret. Both the Turkish article and the Ahmed Riza article further indicate an affinity with France.  --Lambiam 18:44, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure, let's merge them. --Adoniscik(t, c) 08:04, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

text: Merged. --Sulmues Let's talk  13:18, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  2008 merge proposal 

message: Proud... thanks for coming to terms for once and shortening your recent POV addition. Now we are going to take that part from the lead and put it somewhere else. You must understand that the universe is not divided into "Armenians and the rest". In other words, WP has no reason to look at everything, from the biography of a Turkish statesman to the simple pomegranate fruit, leave aside the Armenia article itself, from an Armenian POV. This article is about a great statesman and his attitude towards that issue you have added is not part of the lead of this article. So please change its place yourself and let us keep the peace in this area. --E4024 (talk) 21:45, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead 
Talk:Yahoo! Screen

message: Details can be found here:
http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/video/notices/ugc-notice-07.html;_ylt=AkInwdZQoGeq8jfWoVIqsjr6XyN4
-Anon  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.69.203.12 (talk) 03:54, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of service of Yahoo! Video

message: What's with all the headers but no info? Was someone planning on filling these out? -Fez2005 07:45, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have no idea why these were left empty here for three months, but I have removed them. -- Satori Son 04:12, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Empty headers

message: Given the fact that none of the programming from Yahoo! Screen appears on Yahoo! View, how exactly is this the "de facto" successor?. All Screen material is on Yahoo! TV. View is completely unrelated. 128.151.71.16 (talk) 20:23, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Yahoo! Screen

message: they arent all the same like Yahoo! Video and Yahoo! Screen are completely different services. They should be split into their own pages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lyanbox782 (talk • contribs) 
: Tentative oppose. The only reason given is "completely different services" which in itself isn't compelling enough. Had the page been large or unwieldy, sure. Now it's so small I see little reason to create three even smaller pages. CapnZapp (talk) 16:22, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should we split all of Yahoo's video services into their own pages
Talk:Northern Rivers, New South Wales

message: The article for North Coast, New South Wales should be merged with this one as the two regions are the same thing.
The map on this page shows the various recognised regions of NSW well.
This page describes the geographical area of the region well: note how it says "[j]ust north of Coffs Harbour..."
Coffs Harbour is part of the Mid-North Coast of NSW, not the Northern Rivers. The Northern Rivers is recognised as starting from the Clarence River catchment area, which begins just south of Grafton in the Glenugie area. It extends to the Tweed River on the Queensland border. Peter1968 07:46, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Armenian volunteer units

message: According to the lead: "its ranks were primarily made up of Armenians from the Russian Empire, though there were also a number of Armenians from the Ottoman Empire"
This sentence is not sourced. Out of the 150,000 troops in the Armenian volunteer units, do we (at least roughly) know the % of etnic Russians, ethnic Armenians from the Russian Empire, ethnic Armenians from the Ottoman Empire, ethnic Armenians from elsewhere, and others? A455bcd9 (talk) 10:24, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ottoman Armenian volunteers in the Russian army
Talk:The Essential Eddie Money

message: Some of these songs have articles...Daniel Christensen (talk) 18:21, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Hyperlinks
Talk:Bahaeddin Şakir

message: St. Bahattin Şakir was a great poet. 
"Tüfek patlamasın
Asker yapmasın
Ermeni kalmasın
Büyüklerin derisini yüzmek
Güzel kadınları seçmek
Kalanları sürgün etmek."
Why cannot we thank him for the huge step forward we, mankind as a whole, owe him? 
Apocolocynthosis (talk) 20:25, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Umarım günün birinde onurlu bir insan çıkıp da Ermenilerin Ruslarla işbirliği halinde Anadolu'da Müslüman Türklere Kürtlere Araplara çerkezlere ve çeçenlere yaptığı soykırımı da söyler 151.135.218.55 (talk) 19:45, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Writing classes
Talk:1889 Bashkale clash

message: hmmm ... POV, original research, couldnt find much on the incident, except from racist genocide denial sites. hmmm ...
and article still needs to be copy editted 72.79.62.219 00:51, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The sentence quoted below, the 3rd and last sentence of the first paragraph of the article, is completely ungrammatical and unintelligible. If the editor who originally posted it is still available it would be advisable for him/her to rewrite it so that it makes sense. Otherwise, it would be best to delete it from the article to maintain an encyclopedic standard. "The event was important as it was reflected on main Armenian newspapers as the recovered documents on the Armenakans showed an extensive plot for an uprising." Diranakir (talk) 01:06, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Last Sentence in Lead Paragraph
Talk:Battle of Bitlis

message: Per the Milhist infobox template, results should be simply x victory or inconclusive. Additional statements should be included in the article body, not the infobox. I simplified the results to match this, but after reading the article itself, I am not entirely clear that this was an Ottoman victory. Perhaps it would be better to write inconclusive?  Annwfwn (talk) 18:02, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Results
Talk:Rob Tornoe

message: *01. Get involved at [WikiProject Comics]. I let the Wikipedia:WikiProject Comics know I added this cartoonist and asked for their help and advice. 
*02. Linked my username and this cartoonist to their links (in hopefully the right places. Ronbo76 08:43, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: To Do List

message: # Come to a consensus about the organization of comics-related articles
# Coordinate the editing of comics-related articles
# Develop comics-related articles into authoritative, high-quality reference material, making Wikipedia's comics coverage better than any existing reference book!
# Follow our standard for the interpretation of copyright and fair use as it applies to the comic book articles. (See #Copyright for more information.) Ronbo76 08:55, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Goals

message: Reference #1 reflects comic strips drawn by Rob Tornoe which depicted Peanuts on January 4, 2007 and Al Gore on January 3, 2007. Eventually those strips will no longer be displayed on the referenced site page.  Ronbo76 03:11, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference #1 
Talk:Red Carpet Massacre

message: Did anyone hear the rumour that the new album is called Gloss?
:Yep, I've heard it.  The name was invented (along with many others) as a joke on the DD.com message boards.  Somehow an Italian fan group picked it up, and the rumour ended up being printed in Italian media, and now is being picked up in some English media again.  :)  Not that I wouldn't put it past Duran Duran to actually pick it as a title....it sounds like a DD album, doesn't it?  Anyway, just a rumour for now -- they're being very close-lipped about the album this time around (and you can be sure they're trying not to let any demos leak like last time, too!)  — Catherine\talk — Catherine\talk 07:50, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Album title "Gloss" 

message: This is just way too much.  Not only should these images not appear anywhere but on the articles for the singles, but they are way too huge and all of the information shown here should already be in the individual articles for the singles.  All of this is absolutely not needed here - it looks like a fansite. - eo 20:54, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Singles section - OVERKILL

message: It's not a reliable enough source to put in the article yet, but a party-goer notes that the name of the album is going to be Red Carpet Massacre -- see http://notesonaparty.blogspot.com/2007/06/night-with-duran-duran.html
Youtube clips from the Hammerstein Ballroom show include Night Runner, The Valley, Box Full of Honey (and Lonely in your Nightmare, for good measure!) — Catherine\talk 21:02, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Red Carpet Massacre

message: The creation of a message board is not notable.  Forums are created for a billion different reasons.  It certainly does not merit its own header in the article and it most certainly is not more notable than the departure of a key band member during recording (as was mentioned in this edit summary ).  I have no idea what the Bashing Forum is, but it certainly is not official, i.e. directly related to the band's official website or the website of their record label, so it does not belong here. - eo 16:56, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Bashing Forum"
Talk:1909 Ottoman countercoup

message: At times reads like an opinion peace.  This is an encyclopedic entry.  People forget.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.229.112.98 (talk) 22:51, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too opinionated 

message: Some notes for future reference. The distinction between this article (subject = the military mutiny & "countercoup") and the 31 March Incident (subject = just the putting down of the "countercoup", review this diff) seems artificial and may be OR. There also seems to be some disagreement among sources as to whether this was a true counter-coup/revolution or a political crisis.
*Bedross Der Matossian (Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal Journal, 2011), writing on the context of the Adana massacres describes the narrative currently given by this article "The counterrevolution was not a spontaneous outburst by dissatisfied elements in Istanbul; rather, it was organized by oppositional elements mainly represented by conservative religious circles within the empire" (p.153). A large number of cites are provided to support this statement on pgs. 164–5 (endnote 7).
*Britannica describes the original mutiny itself as the 31st March Incident and describes its cause as "the discontent of ordinary soldiers over their conditions and their neglect by college-trained and politically ambitious officers and from what they regarded as infidel innovations ... encouraged by a religious organization known as the Mohammedan Union", as well as "the weakness of the government [which] allowed the mutiny to spread". 
*Victor Swenson (Journal of Contemporary History, 1970) attacks "the conspiracy hypothesis" and emphasises the military and political failure of the CUP in Istanbul (p. 184). He describes the incident as a "military insurrection ... permitted to expand into a major political crisis by the collapse of Huseyin Hilmi Pasha's government, which took no steps to suppress of control the uprising". He writes "The conspiracy theory of the uprising was deliberately advanced by the Committee of Union and Progress in order to justify the march of the army and to preserve the CUP's prestige and reputation" (p. 172).
Extra sources:  . Lots more on JSTOR. Jr8825 • Talk 03:50, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming/disagreement in sources 

message: You seem to be unnecessarily reverting my edits, A cypriot-islamist is a type of islamist, I'm trying to make it clear. People usually don't notice that  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.79.162.223 (talk) 20:53, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please do not do this 