Talk:Lee Chapman

message: "Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Lee Chapman. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Dan1980 21:05, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dan1980's exact comment, accusing me of vandalism. 

message: I think that to include his accusations of Wifebeating are perfectly valid. I know little about football, but I have heard of him for the simple reason that he allegedly hits women. At the end of the day, the news reported it so it should be on the information about him. —Preceding unsigned comment added by MagnusPyke (talk • contribs) 
:Me too. I watch football and Chapman was a well known player. But he was nothing special, and he would be forgotten about now if it were not for the allegagtions against him. His wife claims she was injured after having sex - at the least that should be included. 82.35.59.204 07:31, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Magnus Pyke chipping in his 2 cents 

message: Both edits were very badly written. The first cited no sources and the second linked to a single article in which Leslie Ash clearly denies the allegations.  The second edit contained contradicting statements making it nonsensical, and I therefore would class this as vandalism.
If you can write a mature, professional section regarding the allegations then I would be happy to leave the comments in the article, however as they were the comments failed on some or all of the following policies and guidelines:
*Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons
*Wikipedia:Libel
*Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not
*Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
*Wikipedia:Citing sources
By the way, I find it very suspicious that two new user accounts have been set up within minutes of each other and that their only contributions are on this talk page and the same article (The Law of the Playground).
My advice to you "both" would be to thoroughly read Wikipedia:Guide to writing better articles and the above mentioned policies and then re-submit your comments in a manner that is suitable for inclusion on Wikipedia. Dan1980 19:28, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Response

message: I don't know what was said originally, but surely highlighting accusations is perfectley acceptible? At the end of the day - he was accused of it. Therefore it should be part of his biography, should it not ? --MagnusPyke 09:35, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Stupid Boy, Pyke

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Lee Chapman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120214110820/http://www.chamoisfc79.fr/visiteur/historique/ex_joueur.php?id_joueur=45 to http://www.chamoisfc79.fr/visiteur/historique/ex_joueur.php?id_joueur=45
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:24, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Lee Chapman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://www.thisisnottingham.co.uk/Forest-stars-recall-Hillsborough-horror/story-12261264-detail/story.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111116232520/http://www.growingbusiness.co.uk/a-game-of-two-halves.html to http://www.growingbusiness.co.uk/a-game-of-two-halves.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:40, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified