Talk:Battle of Chawinda

message: The territorial changes section says that  
While the source cited to it doesn't say that it was captured during the Battle of Chawinda, rather it was captured in the Sialkot region. So it should be removed as the Indian advance was halted at Chawinda they didn't gain any territory in this battle. LiamKhan469 (talk) 21:11, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: This appears to be a fair observation of the actual battle. Cinderella157 (talk) 23:50, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Then please remove it.LiamKhan469 (talk) 15:45, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Not done: Request was made by a user banned for sockpuppetry  bop34 • talk • contribs 12:12, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Territorial changes 

message: In light of the sources mentioned below, should the result be changed from "inconclusive" to Indian defeat or Pakistani victory? Thanks --101.53.225.41 (talk) 20:04, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The sources that describe it as India's failure they at best fall in the Indian Defeat interpretation. If editors disagree with adding newspaper then I have no problem with it.-101.53.225.41 (talk) Blocked sock
*101.53.225.41, what is your brief and neutral statement? At over 8,000 bytes, the statement above (from the  tag to the next timestamp) is far too long for  to handle, and so it is not being shown correctly at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/History and geography. The complex formatting may be exacerbating the problem. The RfC may also not be publicised through WP:FRS until a shorter statement is provided. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 22:00, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  Link to the 2015 RfC, where the consensus was for "Pakistani victory" before it was removed post the one-sided 2018 "RfC". Mar4d (talk) 14:22, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  RFC: Should the result be changed to Indian defeat or Pakistani victory 

message: *Comment sources that describe India failing to achieve operational goals at this battle do no necessarily conflict with the "inconclusive" interpretation. I'd be curious if there are any military journals that look at this outcome. Since this is generally a contested subject, I suggest avoiding newspapers like The Independent or The Diplomat. The independent even says "what has been regarded as a victory" which begs the question, regarded by who? -Indy beetle (talk) 20:24, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The sources that describe it as India's failure they at best fall in the Indian Defeat interpretation. If editors disagree with adding newspaper then I have no problem with it.-101.53.225.41 (talk) Blocked sock
*101.53.225.41, what is your brief and neutral statement? At over 8,000 bytes, the statement above (from the  tag to the next timestamp) is far too long for  to handle, and so it is not being shown correctly at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/History and geography. The complex formatting may be exacerbating the problem. The RfC may also not be publicised through WP:FRS until a shorter statement is provided. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 22:00, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  Link to the 2015 RfC, where the consensus was for "Pakistani victory" before it was removed post the one-sided 2018 "RfC". Mar4d (talk) 14:22, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey (Should the result be changed to Indian defeat or Pakistani victory)

message: As already mentioned, an RFC concluded that it was a Pakistani Victory. The decision was further reviewed and consensus was once again in favor of the RFC - Pakistani Victory. 
The participants of this short talk page discussion concluded the battle was inconclusive. 
Should the result of the Battle of Chawinda be "Pakistani Victory" or "Indian defeat"? Joooshhh (talk) 19:29, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  RFC on the Result - Pakistani Victory/Indian defeat 

message: Please add the following sections
 ==Other 1971 battles in the vicinity==
* Battle of Asal Uttar
* Battle of Chumb
* Battle of Chawinda
* Battle of Ichogil Bund
* Battle of Kasur
* Battle of Pul Kanjri
 == See also ==
* Indo-Pakistan Wars
* Operation Grand Slam
Thank you. 
119.74.238.54 (talk) 03:53, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made.  Spintendo  04:32, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 18 December 2023