Talk:Kakashi Hatake/Archive 1

message: Does anybody have an idea of why his name is translated into "Scarecrow"? Why does he cover his face and does that have something to do with his name(does his appearance scare everybody away?)?  Does it have something to do with The Wizard of Oz? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.192.60.51 (talk • contribs) 19:35, 29 October 2005  (UTC)
If I remember correctly, Kishimoto named Kakashi Kakashi, because he liked the sound of it. The face-covering thing was because Kishimoto thought ninja should cover their faces. --JadziaLover 20:49, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the tankōbon extras, Kishimoto was split between naming him  or  to the very end.  He does not regret his decision. –Gunslinger47 22:51, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Scarecrow?

message: Is there a source for the Raikiri/Chidori distinction? My impression was they are simply two names for the same thing. --86.144.234.245 17:55, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, the data books. ～卍 JadziaLover 会話~投稿 卐～ 18:46, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It should be sourced in the article, then --86.144.234.245 18:51, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Raikiri

message: Whats the name of that move Kakashi does to summon the thunder clouds in episode 5 of the anime. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 216.190.247.165 (talk • contribs) 17:32, 23 June 2006  (UTC)
:It's unnamed... If it even IS a technique, anime tends to use colourful backgrounds to emphasize emotions, like the cliffs with the splashing waves when Lee and Gai does one of their little antics. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.228.148.172 (talk • contribs) 19:14, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Thunder Clouds

message: Hatake Kakashi → Kakashi Hatake – As pointed out in Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Anime_and_manga#Naruto_character_article_titles, the current names for articles about Naruto characters are inconsistent with the names used for other anime characters (Naruto characters use Japanese order for names, while most other anime characters have their name in Western order), as well not following the naming guidelines in WP:MOS-JA. 
DO NOT COMMENT HERE. Please participate in the centralized discussion at Talk:Uzumaki Naturo --Kunzite 01:50, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: How come Kakashi-sensei is nominated as a "fictional pervert"?!?! (Seriously, WHO did it?)
It seems like the requirements for being a "fictional pervert" is:
Fictional characters who:
# "Have knowledge of and have even tried out other forms of sex"
# "Are often seen spying in locker rooms"
I mean, Jiraiya deserves the title but... our beloved Kakashi-sensei?!?!
:Well, maybe if you count the fact that he reads "Icha Icha Paradise"... --Alexie 05:00, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The actual content of those, though more than likely perverted, is never actually seen. This guy does have a point, though. Reading porn, no matter how frequently, doesn't make one a pervert. Reading it in the open might, but again, we're not certain just what's in those novels. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 05:07, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You'd know what a pervet is huh Someguy? I'm not sayin' this to offend you, but I trufully believe that you have a great grasp of knowledge of the English language. Power level (Dragon Ball) 17:49, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Kakashi never seemed like a pervert. He just reads "Icha Icha Paradise". Someguy0830 has a point; "Reading porn, no matter how frequently, doesn't make one a pervert. Reading it in the open might". --Tadhg Plummer 13:56, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  fictional perverts?!?! 

message: I was wondering if the more experienced a ninja is the less he/she has to rely on hand seals, for example naruto uses a hand seal to initiate kage bunshin but whenever we see a high level ninja like kakashi use kage bunshin I see no hand seals.BLaCk 00:44, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's just a shortcut in animation. It would be tedious to animate all of the hand seals, so they omit them a lot of the time. Nemu 00:50, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ooh, that makes sense. They do it so often that I thought since theyve done it so many times that they remember the chakra molding required for the jutsu.BLaCk 23:32, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

text: I think Kakashi uses the hand sign for Kage-bunshin. It happens after Zabuza dies, and to fight the bandits. Lascoden 04:04, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hand Seals 

message: I don't know why but, shouldn't we show the image of Rin, Obito, the 4th Hokage and Kakaski from the anime from the 3rd's flashbacks, instead of the manga one. Cobalt 17:14, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: thats cool but can you get the pic? (if you can please do it).--Kenshin -Himura 20:58, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: nice.--Kenshin -Himura 00:19, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kakashi's photo with 4th team 

message: Is it just me, or is jounin spelled wrong? I'm guessing it may be a japanese to english spelling difference or something, but it's spelled "jounin" in the subs of the japanese version of the anime, and I just thought I'd ask. We try to have our facts right, right? ;) -Sinujutsu
:"Jounin" is never used in the article. It literalizes the long o sound of Jōnin. The romanized version simply uses "Jonin". It's like saying Hyuuga. Pointless. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 05:05, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Jounin

message: I attempted a massive clean-up of the detail in this article and reworked tons of otherwise unnecessary detail (deleting or otherwise moving it to trivia), but alas, my version was reverted back to its original. Why!? This article reads like a book report!!! 
Bad.
I'm hoping we can come to a reasonable compromise for personal reasons and also because the article is excessively LONG. I'm hoping we can work together to clean this section up. I propose:
*reorganizing of sections > why are history and the Parts 1 + 2 separate? Do we need a huge ABILITIES section when that can BRIEFLY be explained in the Background sect?
*removal of detail, or otherwise its transfer to trivia sect. > for instance
** "Kakashi also has another famous (or infamous, depending on who's been on the receiving end) jutsu called One Thousand Years of Death. Despite the verbose title, which is even longer when he actually uses it, this is simply an extremely sharp poke to an opponent's rectum with the index and middle fingers of both hands (the ninja version of a kancho), launching them into midair with humiliating pain. This is first demonstrated by Kakashi on Naruto during the Survival Training Exam. Naruto discovers the true purpose of the jutsu and uses it in a modified form during his fight with Gaara."
...I'm not quite sure what to say about that. It's funny, but...very out of place here.
PLEASE check out the following.
*Wikipedia:Avoid_peacock_terms
*Wikipedia:Article size
*Wikipedia:Guide_to_writing_better_articles
**"Readers may tire of reading a page much longer than about 6,000 to 10,000 words, which roughly corresponds to 30 to 50 KB of readable prose. Thus the 32 KB recommendation is considered to have stylistic value in many cases; if an article is significantly longer than that, then it probably should be summarized with detail moved to other articles (see Wikipedia:Summary style). For most long pages, division into sections is natural anyway; even if there is no "natural" way to split a long list or table, many editors believe that it should be done anyway, to allow section editing."
....PLEASE someone take the initiative and clean this article up! --Jc215flip 01:42, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  recent revision 

message: I have noticed today that I cannot find the information which I clearly remember to be here some time ago. After some history browsing it was discovered that TTN removed the whole section with the facts I was looking for (the whole section called "trivia" was removed on the 1st of September). I have put a part of those trivia back, and that was followed by a lightning quick reaction of TTN who reversed my edit with a rather weak argument "none of that is important".
Setting aside some thoughts in that section that I think are nice but not that important, I would like to draw attention to two facts (quoted from what used to be the Trivia section):
* Kishimoto can be quoted once saying that for a long while, Kakashi's name was supposed to be 'Enoki'.  	 
* As of the second data book, Kakashi has completed 197 D-rank, 189 C-rank, 414 B-rank, 277 A-rank, and 39 S-ranked missions.
Personally I think that the first one is just nice to know (perhaps we should add the "gozaru" bit, too), and the second item is something one might want to know and I can tell you it is not found that easily on the web. Perhaps TTN would care to elaborate on why (s)he thinks it is not important for the encyclopedia readers to know and/or some other contributors would care to express their opinions about whether these lines deserve their place in the article? --Ru.spider 18:17, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nobody could find a valid source about the Enoki bit, and the missions are unneeded "cruft." Nemu 18:25, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia: to be or not to be 

message: I have a pice of his real face in naruto http://sjl-static6.sjl.youtube.com/vi/eqt2kKcw2WQ/2.jpg
:Fake. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 21:42, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Looks like a low-res photoshop job. Uzumaki 18:52, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

text: His eyes are too small to see (it is on my computer.) But fake, nonetheless. // Sasuke-kun27 00:56, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Heh heh, well I guess my glasses aren't thick enough! ^_^ But still, you'd think there'd be a small glimmer of red. I didn't see it cuz I glued my face to the moniter trying to find it. But maybe the pic is so small because the person doesn't want to admit that it's fake. And the face is deformed, too. Okay, I'll stop now. Don't want to start an arguement, like the one in the Talk: Naruto Uzumaki page. Whew! ¡Adios! Kyo cat 01:06, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

text: Yeah, there's such a big difference between the two, meaning yours must be real. ~SnapperTo 01:43, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That image needs to be deleted for several reasons: it's not being used on any articles ("orphaned"); no copyright tag; extremely high possibility that it isn't even real... you guys get the idea. // DecaimientoPoético 01:47, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OrphanBot will find it eventually. ~SnapperTo 01:50, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pic of real face 

message: If the piledriver move that Sasuke hit Orochimaru with in the Forest of Death, and Naruto with at the Valley of the End is called Peregrine Falcon Drop, then isn't that the exact same move that Kakashi killed Roga Nadare with in the first Naruto Movie? It was not any Omote Renge I've ever scene. However in the Falcon Drop's article it notes the similarity due to the fact that they are both moves that drop an enemy on there head with the force of both combatants weight from a high altitude. But the move should be on Kakashi's moves list. Rayfire 20:59, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peregrine Falcon Drop 

message: Is it explicitly stated that Kakashi's promotion was due to a lack of manpower? If not, then Iorinyc is perfectly justified in removing that part. --Pentasyllabic 22:25, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  No, it was not stated explicitly and is therefore speculative. --Ru.spider 23:38, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kakashi's promotion to Jonin 

message: I thought that Might Guy was the strongest Jonin in Konohagakure , not Kakashi from the "manga databooks" as it says so on his ability section. Can someone shed light on this? – Power level (Dragon Ball) (Don't talk to me! I'm still a virgin... | I'm innocent - kidding)
:: If you compare the diagrams on pages 56 (Guy) and 94 (Kakashi) of the First Official Databook, you can see that in four of the eight parameters Guy beats Kakashi by a bit, and in the other four Kakashi is significantly better. However, Might Guy has never been given a chance in manga or anime to show such powerful moves as Kakashi does on a regular basis. Besides that, Kakashi is widely known in the world of Naruto (even in foreign countries), unlike Guy (a foreigner knowing him is shown only once, in anime filler). --Ru.spider 23:38, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  This perception might have come from the fact that when he's introduced, he holds a 50 to 49 lead over Kakashi in various contests. However, as is shown later these contests invariably range from sprinting to janken. These contests seem to happen regularly (such as the "Who can defeat more Ninja game they play during the Invasion of Konoha arc). It's difficult to say who is a stronger Ninja as they've never actually fought. 151.151.73.163 19:42, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: Question 

message: No offense, but how do any of us know that he can only use Lightning Blade four times in a day. He could have progressed(I spelled it wrong) during the time jump. I hope they don't kill off Kakashi like they did to Asuma.Sam ov the blue sand 23:38, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's entirely possible. Maybe we should mention the 4-time-a-day comment was from Part I.  Sphinxridd 20:46, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lightning Blade 

message: I have a question about the name of this technique, why not Raikiri? I understand the conventions of the English Wiki, but there are exceptions such as (jutsu) and it seems to me that the style of the English manga and anime is to leave the names of stylized jutsu such as Chidori or Rasengan in their original Japanese...so why the difference in policy with Raikiri? Actually now that I think about it Chidori and Rasengan were changed on this site too...why, when both versions of the manga refer to them as such? If we're switching everything over to english then should'nt we switch over terms like Kekkei Genkai, Jutsu, and Akatsuki as well? Their seems to be a double standard. I dont plan on altering anything without a consensus but I would appreciate a response on the subject.--Master Shan 16:11, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm fairly certain neither Chidori nor Rasengan have been unveiled in either the manga or anime. They have in the games, but we don't count those. In any case, jutsu names are Englishized for consistency and to prevent having to write out an entire line of text to make one link. Furthermore, the reason we use things like ninjutsu, kekkei genkai, etc, is because the English uses them as loan words in place of their actual translation. The same is not true of jutsu. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 16:16, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Viz calls Chidori "1000 Birds". Numbers are the new black apparently. ~SnapperTo 18:37, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Lazy bastards. Well, at least that justifies the convention. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 18:41, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ahh I see, for some reason I could have sworn the English Anime had gotten to Chidori, but I see now that they are just before. Well w/e I guess thats that, though for the record I believe Rasengan and Chidori sound much cooler than A thousnad Birds or Spirialing Sphere from and english perspective...and alot less lame and long winded to shout out in battle...but thats just imho.--Master Shan 02:00, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "Chidori" and "Rasengan" probably don't sound any more interesting to Japanese people than "One Thousand Birds" and "Spiraling Sphere" do to English people, as the Japanese probably think of the jutsu as what their meanings are (ie. "One Thousand Birds" and "Spiraling Sphere"). ~SnapperTo 04:37, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh I'm sure thats the case. But the fact remains in Japanese they are one word, not several and thus not long winded. Also I image translating them will mess with the lip flap syncronization...but w/e. I suppose we'll see the decision soon enough.--Master Shan 20:54, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's the good thing about Kakashi. He can talk all he wants and you never know how his lips are movings. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 20:59, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Lightning Blade or Raikiri?

message: sorry, this probably isn't the right place to ask, but i thought you guys probably know - After Kakashi picked up Naruto at the Valley of the End, he mentioned a previous fight that happened there and commented that Naruto/Sasuke's fates were similar to those 2 statues'. What fight was Kakashi referring to and who are those 2 statues? sorry for the random and dumb question! --Sphinxridd 04:10, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It was the fight that is said to have created the valley, which I imagine was between the two men depicted as statues (one of whom looks to be the First Hokage). ~SnapperTo 04:37, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: a random question

message: current arc seems to be a couple of chapters old. also, in 335, what did Kakashi give Shikamaru before Shikamaru's attach on Hidan? --Sphinxridd 04:48, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. –Gunslinger47 22:59, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Current Arc

message: Hey, the page disappeared. The only thing I see is "g". You guys need to fix that.75.71.168.102 00:49, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: that was taken care of last hour hit refresh or F5--Xiahou 00:51, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page Display 

message: Does anyone know how many times a day Kakashi can use Chidori? I know that he can use Raikiri four times a day.Jacce 20:23, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It doesn't matter. He never uses the former. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 21:16, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: But it would be fun to know88.206.159.226 12:13, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The point is, since he never uses it, we don't know. Retlor 12:10, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

text: Ok but if he never uses it, then shouldnt it be taken off the list of his SIGNATURE jutsu? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.185.163.37 (talk) 16:31, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kakashi and Chidori 

message: In the most recent chapter it appears that Kakashi uses Raikiri to finish off Kakuzu. Since he had already used it four times, shouldn't we note his increase in skill? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.152.161.152 (talk) 18:20, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: He doesn't name it, so it might not be the same skill. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 18:28, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Raikari skill increased? 

message: It it ever said what Kakashi's new Mangekyou Sharingan Jutsu is called? The warping one. 74.234.61.231 04:10, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No. Treima 04:20, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kakashi's New Jutsu 

message: http://groups.msn.com/SHAMANS-SHINOBIS/kishimotoscharacterdesigns.msnw if you see "Concept 2 - Hatake Kakashi" - you'll notice that there is an interesting piece of trivia about Kishimoto deciding on his appearance in the story and what to name him. I don't believe this is a fake or random site, as Snapper2 and Someguy0830 pointed out. I wanted to keep the trivia in the beginning of Kakashi's article with a citation needed , but Someguy0830 reverted me again and said that it still shouldn't even be mentioned. I disagree. Then why do we have quotes on Neji's and Hinata's articles that can have citations needed but Kakashi can't have one? Who can help out here? Power level (Dragon Ball) 01:37, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it is. It's certainly not verifiable. There is no point in leaving an indefinite citation needed. If this was real, I'm pretty sure a real source would have come up by now. It's just an internet rumor. Nemu 01:42, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Must I say again to find the volume/issue of whatever that the website got the information from? That would be an actual source. Also, Hinata and Neji really don't need the quotes that they have in their articles, so take them out if they bother you that much. ~SnapperTo 03:13, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this a fansite? 

message: Since this is a Japanese anime, and the Japanese name order is family name - given name, that is how the names should be written. Would you change the order of your name if you went to Japan? Yes, this is the English wikipedia, but it's not an English show. Correcting the names makes them incorrect, no matter what you've been spoon-fed by Viz and Toonami.
Also, quoting Wikipedia as a source for the information on wikipedia is really...stupid. I can't say that I'm right because I decided that; I need to have proof. Citing a link to a wikipedia page as proof that Westernized name orders are correct is illogical and rather childish. Quit it.
If someone can give me proof that Westernizing the names of Japanese characters in a Japanese show is actually the correct way to write them, I'll stop changing it. And, by the way, you can't cite the anime and manga as sources for that, because it's Japanese name-order in the scanlationed manga and fansubbed Japanese anime. Shikamarumode 21:45, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: We've discussed this. It's Western order. Why you may ask? First, read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:NeoChaosX/Naruto_names if you would. Once you read that, understand this. Dubbing companies > fansubbing and scantalation groups. Don't like it? I'm sure there's a forum you could complain to. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 21:49, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

text: Nice try, but you don't know what you're talking about, and you obviously don't want to read the link because it explains in all too certain terms why you're not going to get your way. You're simply trying to misuse Wiki guidelines to make your point valid, and it's going to fail. It's in Western order because it is officially dubbed as such in the English version of the anime, which is the predominant media of Naruto in English speaking countries. If you have a problem with that fact, you can take it up with them. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 21:59, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Would you like to try coming up with a reason better than "It originates from Japan"? This matter was discussed last year, and the community decided to use western naming order. It's tough cookies if you're late to the party, but you can't override consensus to meet your approval. ~SnapperTo 22:00, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll admit, I didn't read the link. That's my bad. I did read it now, though, and you're still wrong.
Westernizing Japanese names puts them into last name - first name order. Let me show you how.
First - the beginning, the initial, the one that comes before all others.
Last - the end, the one that comes after all others
Name - I'm sure you know what a name is.
Your first name would, therefore, be the name you give first when introducing yourself. It does not necessarly have to be your given name.
Your last name is the name you give last when introducing yourself. It does not necessarily have to be your family name.
In Japan, the first name - last name order is family name - given name. Westernizing it makes it last name - first name, which is, apparently, not supposed to be used on wikipedia. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Shikamarumode (talk • contribs) 22:11, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

text: I don't even know where to start. That is wrong on so many levels. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 22:16, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

text: The fact that you believe its right is sad. First name = given name. First name =/= the first name you use. I suppose you want to claim that James Bond's first name is Bond because he introduces himself as "Bond, James Bond"? Your argument is flawed in the total sense of the term. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 22:23, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

text: And it's sad that you're willing to twist the meanings of terms into something so obviously incorrect to suit your whims. I'll put this very simply. Even if that nonsense you wrote were remotely true, and anyone with an education can tell you it's not, your complaints do not even matter. To quote WP:MOS-JP: "For a modern figure (a person born from the first year of Meiji (1868) onward), always use the Western order of given name + family name for Western Alphabet, and Japanese Style family name+<space>+given name for Japanese Characters." Care to beat that? — Someguy0830 (T | C) 22:39, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: To add to that, Japanese uses family name + given name. An example of this is "Hatake Kakashi". English uses given name + family name. An example of this is "Kakashi Hatake". You're switching Japanese naming order to English and then switching it back to Japanese to try and make it seem like Japanese order = English order, which it doesn't. ~SnapperTo 22:39, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

text: Can't you read, or are you ignoring us in the hopes it'll make your argument valid? To quote WP:MOS-JP#Names of modern figures: "For a modern figure (a person born from the first year of Meiji (1868) onward), always use the Western order of given name + family name for Western Alphabet, and Japanese Style family name+<space>+given name for Japanese Characters." Click the link. Guidelines trump nonsense, which is all you've given us. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 22:57, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You need to abandon the idea of first name + last name, as it has nothing to do with the issue at hand and only seems to be muddling your argument. ~SnapperTo 23:32, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  On  the subject of name changes... 

message: Why does Kakashi keep his face covered? Is there any reason?
:Aside from his Sharingan-powered left eye, there has been no given reason as to why he wears a mask. Chances are, he just loves to look 1337. You Can't See Me! 02:45, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Face

message: Can anyone tell me if this is real or fake?(warning:possible spoiler)
http://www.u-blog.net/K3nny432/img/kakashi_232.jpgQuietDrive627 22:10, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Most likely fake. // DecaimientoPoético 01:00, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ya, probably fake, but he looks like hes about to own someone. KKIPPES 04:12, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  face spoiler 

message: "Current team 	Team 10 (Kakashi Hatake, Shikamaru Nara, Ino Yamanaka, Choji Akimichi)"
The current team in the Anime is Hatake Kakashi, Uzumaki Naruto and Haruno Sakura. —The preceding comment was added by Shizznizzle (talk • contribs • [/wiki/Special:Log/move?user={{urlencode:Shizznizzle page moves] • block user • [/wiki/Special:Log/block?page=User:{{urlencode:Shizznizzle block log])
:They're not considered a team unless they're formely organized into one. If Kakashi went out next with Team 8, then that's what would be put. As of now, he's on leave. Sephiroth BCR 06:34, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Current team

message: Shouldnt we update his abilities? It doesnt even mention all of his abilities pre-time skip i.e.- Hightened sense of smell, and Chakra gates. But after his improvements post time-skip the sections just woefully inadequate.--Master Shan 20:14, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You could try adding what you think needs to be added. You don't need permission to contribute to the article. ~SnapperTo 20:52, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Abilities

message: Image that display Kakashi Sharingan
a very disturbing tacniqe of his is 1000 years of pain in which he puts his hands into the tiger seal and shoves it up his oppenets rear sending them flying away
:First, learn to spell ("tacniqe" is spelled technique), use proper punctuation, and sign your posts. Second, what the hell are you trying to get at? // DecaimientoPoético 17:35, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: im adding the debut of other characters like kakashi i am adding his debut in part II —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jackjohnson15 (talk • contribs) 20:01, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  second debut  

message: We have yet to see Kakashi use chidori, so shouldn't it be removed from his list of SIGNATURE jutsu/kekkai genkai?24.185.163.37 21:20, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The fact that he created it means that it should probably stay on the list.Retlor 05:57, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: He performs it in Kakashi Gaiden as a teen. You Can't See Me! 03:52, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: So he did. I forgot about that.Retlor 18:43, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chidori removal