Talk:Decembrist revolt

message: Under which date should the event be listed? Old style, new style, or both? Currently it is listed under December 14#Events. BACbKA 10:05, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  The date 

message: I propose changing the phrase "exiled to Siberia and the Far East" to "exiled to Siberia, Central Asia, and the Far East."  Unfortunately I don't have the documentation anymore, but in the city where I used to live (Ust'-Kamenogorsk, Kazakhstan) we attributed some of our civic development to exiled Decembrists who moved there.  They made the town a lot better (is the story) -- they built the first firehouse, with a little watchtower on top; they say it made a big difference in a day when the structures were almost all wood and the town often suffered devastating fires.  I learned this years ago at the local history museum there, I've moved since then, and these are all recollections from memory.
Arguably at the time Kazakhstan simply WAS just another chunk of Siberia, but I don't think that's the best label to use anymore.  And I have this notion that the exiles scattered about Central Asia, not just to this one city.  Does anybody have more data about this??
LandruBek 12:16, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Although Kazakhstan was a part of the Russian Empire in the 1820s, most of the rest of what we call "Central Asia" wasn't. We would have to be quite specific about our terminology if we were to add other places of exile. Ahasuerus 16:28, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Exiles also went to Central Asia? 

message: British Dan:
I was wondering if anyone could help me? The article refers to Herzen, Pushkin, Neksasov and Tolstoy all honouring the Decembrists in some manner. Could anyone specifically point me in the direction of the relevant newspapers, poems and novels in which this is done? Many thanks.
::Pushkin wrote several moving verse epistles to his friends the Decembrists; the first volume of his Sovremennik opened with "The Feast of Peter I", a disguised plea to the tsar to grant a pardon to the Decembrists. Nekrasov wrote a tedious narrative poem "The Russian Women", about the Decembrist wives who followed their husbands to Siberia. Tolstoy authored "The Decembrists", a novel which gradually evolved into "War and Peace". I'm not sure about Herzen, but "My Past and Thoughts" opens with his (and Ogarev's) vow to carry on the campaign started by the Decembrists; the cover of his London periodical shows the silhouettes of those Decembrists executed after the rebellion. --Ghirla -трёп- 06:47, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  In literature 

message: Why is there no explanation on how the rebel group became known as "The Decembrist"?
If it was because the revolted in December, then the name "Decemberist" would make sense, but without the "e" there, "Decembrist" seems arbitrary and unnatural.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.75.71.133 (talk) 01:39, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The name "Decembrist" 

message: The opening of the article makes it seem as if the motivations of the Decembrists were simply a preference for one monarch over another, implying that the revolt was akin to a royal squabble. In fact, the article goes on to state that they had much greater ambitions, hoping to reform Russian government and society. They simply attempted to take advantage of the confusion surrounding Constantine's public announcement. Their professed loyalty to Constantine was just a method for accomplishing their goals; a way of justifying their rebellious actions at a time when challenging the monarchy was an act that bordered on heresy. The opening should be changed to better reflect the character of the revolt.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.5.85.111 (talk) 07:36, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Opening

message: Who erected the monument to the Decembrists in St. Petersburg -- the Soviets? It would be interesting to know this, with something about the motivation for it, and to have a translation of the plaque text pictured in the second photo.
Sca (talk) 15:20, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, the Soviets. The motivation was to glorify the first revolutionary movement in Russia. The plaque text is as follows:
 Upon this place
 on 13/25 July 1826
 were executed the decembrists
 P. Pestel
 K. Ryleyev
 P. Kakhovsky
 S. Muravyov-Apostol
 M. Bestuzhev-Ryumin
BACbKA (talk) 01:32, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

text: Ugh... no, I don't, sorry :-( as for the above information on motivation, the only source I had is what I had learned at a school in St. Petersburg (then Leningrad), so, naturally, it's rooted in Soviet propaganda. BACbKA (talk) 10:47, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  "In 1940, a monument was erected on Dekabristov Island where the 5 hanged Decembrists had been supposedly buried. In 1975, another monument was put at the place of execution." Source: Saint Petersburg Encyclopedia --Petercorless (talk) 21:00, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Monument

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Decembrist revolt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050214132911/http://decemb.hobby.ru/ to http://decemb.hobby.ru/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:35, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The lede says:
:Russian army officers led about 3,000 soldiers in a protest against Tsar Nicholas I's assumption of the throne after his elder brother Constantine removed himself from the line of succession.
This incident is not referenced in the article. We aren't told the circumstances. Valetude (talk) 20:59, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs explanation 

message: The lead paragraph is confusing.  It should summarize the essence of the conflict, but it uses coup, rebels and conspirators to descrobe, I presume, the same group of people.  It uses loyalists to describe the other side, while the set up is that it wasn't really know exactly who was tsar.  In the same vein it mentions that the Tsar's envoy was killed, but again who was tsar was in dispute - Constantine was supposed to be the tsar and he had declined, but no one knew it?  So was it Constantine's envoy who was killed or Nicholas' who had seized the throne so to speak.  I hope someone who knows what happened can improve the lead paragraph.  I think I worked it out and have made suggestions for editing the lead paragraph below: 
Alexander's heir apparent, Constantine, had privately declined the succession, unknown to the court, and his younger brother Nicholas decided to seize power as Tsar Nicholas I, pending formal confirmation. While some of the army had sworn loyalty to Nicholas, a force of about 3,000 troops tried to mount a military coup in favour of Constantine. The rebels (pro-Constantine) were weakened by dissension between their leaders, but confronted the loyalists (pro-Nicholas) outside the Senate in the presence of a large crowd. In the confusion, Tsar [Nicholas'] envoy was assassinated, and the loyalists responded with heavy artillery which scattered the rebels. Many were sentenced to hanging, prison or exile to Siberia. The pro-Constantine conspirators became known as the Decembrists
Scarykitty (talk) 03:02, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead paragraph is confusing

message: Is the "Prince Eugene Obolensky" the same as "Prince Obolensky" the same as "Eugene Obolensky" - none of which have any link or page - the same as Yevgeny Obolensky ? Could someone corral all these Russian princes? (Note also the linked page doesn't mention half the details mentioned in this article!) Shenme (talk) 01:16, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article confusing?... yes