lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Far from Showbiz

message: This stub used to be sorted under world music, now it's being called rock? These guys haven't "rocked" for several years now.  I don't get it. Filter1987 02:34, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Jason Nevins

message: I think I heard in a Documentary mentioning his "It's Like That" remix, that he didn't get any money from the massive sales of the single, he only got a few thousand dollars for the original remix fee and Run-D.M.C. got all the money (royalties). So maybe this should be mentioned (if my memory is not faulty on this). --Hibernian 20:27, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have mentioned this and provided a reference, cheers. --Freikorp (talk) 14:28, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Money 

message: his father is of turkish descent  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:908:191:5FA0:130:6E41:E88C:903C (talk) 19:10, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  turkish descemt
Template talk:Campaignbox French Revolutionary Wars Royalist Revolts

message: I think we should have a text page providing overview of causes, events, and results of the various revolts against the revolution.  But not wanting to repeat my mistake with the italian campaigns, I will start by asking, does such a page, (or something like it) already exists?  If not, where is some good text from which we might start a page?  Gomm 20:28, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Revolt in the Vendée, is the only page I know of that covers revolts against the French Revolution.--Bryson 20:47, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Text page for [[Revolts against the French Revolution]]
Talk:Genshin

message: Genshin impact 118.103.138.104 (talk) 11:44, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genshin
Talk:Avocet Line

message: I don't really see a reason for these two to be separate articles. I would propose a merge but have no idea how and don't have much time right now; hopefully someone with more time will pick this up and do something. --Muzer (talk) 01:14, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should this be merged with [[Exmouth branch railway]]? 

message: The article states that a number of things are the case. For example "[Exmouth station] is the fifth busiest in Devon." This turns out to be based on a 2009 document, i.e. 14 years ago. Is that true today? I don't know, but it's fundamentally unwise to use these statements without some time-based qualification. Can someone update it and add a time statement, please? Afterbrunel (talk) 18:06, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not able to take a good look myself at the moment, but it could be replaced with, say  etc. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 18:19, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of unqualified present tense
Talk:SC Besa Pejë

message: Making redirect to the former name: FK Budućnost Peć. FkpCascais (talk) 01:45, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect 
Talk:Night Moves (Bob Seger song)

message: Night moves is one of the most brilliant songs ever made and combines multiple instruments and forms of singing. It is brilliant and yet simple altogether and that is why it was so influential to rock n' roll. Bob Seger is a lyrical genius.
B-Bob?  Is that you?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.117.28.162 (talk) 05:58, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Riviera Line

message: To edit the route diagram go to  Geof Sheppard (talk) 13:53, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

message: This proposal is linked to the proposal to split Reading to Plymouth Line into 3 articles.  The Riviera line is not a specific physical line but a branding used first by Wessex Trains and now First Great Western I think the articles should be more about physical lines  than route branding and this article and in terms of physical lines this article will be duplicating the section from Exeter to Newton Abbot so this will be covered by Exeter to Plymouth Line with Newton Abbot to Paignton Line covering other section. ZoeL (talk) 12:10, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The stations do have the branding yes but this is route branding by a TOC and is not related to pyshical lines so the article should be about that only and should not list route availability and freight gauge, Newton Abbot to Paignton is route GW620.  An altenative would be to retain this article for details on route branding and split the content that deals with the physical lines.  ZoeL (talk) 13:10, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: But your reference shows Exeter to Plymouth to be part of a "Fordgate to Penzance" line (Fordgate is a tiny little place near Bridgwater, it has never had a junction or station) Geof Sheppard (talk) 07:28, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The original route was GW100 Paddington to Penzance via Box, this was split in 1999 into 3 routes.  Fordgate is where control changes from Bristol PSB to Exeter PSB.  Mileages are still calculated from Paddington to Penzance via Box and the line designated main on track diagrams uses that route. ZoeL (talk) 14:22, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed split
Talk:Tamar Valley Line

message: Could we have a discussion about the route diagram before being bold and just replacing it?  In my mind the old version gives a better representation of the geography of the line, and also helps to interpret the history which is rather complex due to the complete diversion of the line between Devonport Junction and St Budeaux. Geof Sheppard (talk) 07:27, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't just replace it; it still exists (Template:Tamar Valley Line). The complicated nature of the original RDT was, although of a higher detail, quite a mess to get through; so I stepped in and created a simple route diagram (Template:Tamar Valley Line RDT), that shows stations and connecting lines. Gradually, I intend to use information from the original to update the simple route diagram, to a higher detail and standard. --Kevin Steinhardt (talk) 10:40, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've reverted to the original diagram while we discuss this. If your finished version is going to be more detailed and informative, would you consider developing it to that standard before removing the existing map? AlexTiefling (talk) 10:50, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

text:  That sounds like a good idea. --Kevin Steinhardt (talk) 12:01, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. Apologies for being a little brisk. AlexTiefling (talk) 14:55, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Route diagram

message: I suggest that the RDTs here and here should be merged to form one, or one deleted. Nathan A RF (talk) 16:22, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge RDTs
Talk:Ooze

message: A debate whether the article should be deleted or not has been setteled. At the end it was agreed to keep, but reformat it so it looks more like a disambiguation page, not an article. It is now newly reformated. Kamope  | userpage | talk  |  contributions 21:27, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent news (about the article Ooze) 

message: NVJBLGIUYIFJUIUTIYYIUU2GYKLFKIGKVFHJJUOTUIFI6RG5467GJVKFJFGHGHNJUVGJHHHGRYDERHJFIKTG3456780902QCDGCFVVFHGGGBVXJTU7E6Y5TRTED6YNBNHYIHKIDJEDJHHFGYGHGG     GL,CJGUF,HIGIGJASDFGHYWERT345TY4T346DFFCDXTTEYTTSZ XCBGJHGHOOZXCTEKIRR8W6TRTREE4467556TURFDYYDYDUFUUGTGGFGIGIJKGKMKKKGLKHYJVGVKJVGBVG---242Y67887687676C,MDJDCHGBFGGFH.HTFUYGUGTJGFUTUFJGHHBHGVGVBBBBHVVVGBHHHHHJJJJIKFIRUIDUED2Y6REUFGUHCXUSDIED8KDFCUCYTRT8R74RY7UY3TT47UY7URUUFGFBEYAFEYFEUEFGDFSDUYYRGITYEFFGGYSFRGXXYTDYN FUUF7EHYDFDSXYXCYYFYS676Y877-34456772211556677U88878987889878765432YICFMJNVFHVCGCVGGYYTRHJUFJHHHHBHHG,THLHGKGBGGKGJUHYGFUYYHHGVGHF        GFITGIIUURTFJ            YUYUYFUURFI5   YRT34RE887676     GHFHEGHDS    FYTHGUGJH6HUHPYFTIYUFYUY23446Y            YLGKHGHHVJHJGHHGBJGHGH      GJFJFKT     HJVJGJG  HYJGJHBGHG      FRRURYYRUY5T                   DERHDBNFJHGTHJH     JHHJJH      JUOUIJJJKJ  MJOIUUYYGFNJGHFKIRTURUYRURUTIT5I8YIUYYU8I765TY6TTR4RETRI8UI67TY78776745Y6IIKJIO9000900P-00998876GGB          RFKOIEIEJHRE         BUDH            GKGKY      HYTUTGTG       VBURYTRYU   YBVJGTYH;LFLPOGOLF        JHHYGYHUYYU77     BGBYURYH0  HGJHJHJJGJ    HJJHGHHJ        HGHJHJJHGGFGGF      HUJTFHYFG      FUT       ZXCVB        GIRITUFT5YQF3    VFUGTJGHYHHNNBBHGJBGNH                        VHCHRY             HHDJCDVF            BHGFYRYYT8H0FGDHFJFHYRYG                             HTUFRU     GT5UF5    BHGJH     GHBC HG    HHGFGTFHD8     YTKTIYTGU           TYR     FTR      YHRY     GTTTYT     YRUF    VGF     GGGHHTGUTYDIEJWFUHFJVCNCGVVVBVVVVVCGTTRUTUGVGF5               UDJUIDEGDGFGDXGFHFG           VBHCP  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.183.47.101 (talk) 03:38, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notes from users
Talk:Full House episodes (Season 3)

message: There's a quote from this episode that I'm not sure if it's completely accurate. It involves Danny seeing D.J. & Kimmy and saying he didn't want D.J. going to school "...dressed like Jessica Rabbit".
WAVY 10 20:51, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Back to School Blues

message: On "Our Very First Telethon", what was the name of the song D.J. was singing?
WAVY 10 14:08, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name That Tune 

message: Some of these episode synopses are big enough to go on their own page.  WAVY 10 12:45, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode Comment
Talk:Stamp duty

message: I suggest we split the UK section into a new article (Stamp duty in the United Kingdom) and go with just a summary here that references the main article. Morphh  (talk) 20:28, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Does Stamp duty land tax really merit an article separate from the UK stamp duty section? Given its current small size. I would suggest Stamp duty in the United Kingdom, with SDLT merged into it. If someone can expand SDLT later, it can be split off again. (Mind you, I think I'm biased towards less, but larger, articles) J.Winklethorpe talk 10:39, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this makes sense. Morphh  (talk) 15:31, 01 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Morphh  (talk) 1:59, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Split UK

message: As an American who remembers my history classes "stamp duty" brings to mind the Stamp Act. Is there any relationship between this form of taxation and the taxes Britain imposed on the American Colonies, or is it just a coincidence? 129.93.161.219 (talk) 19:50, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stamp Act
Talk:Newton Abbot

message: '...Work parties have made a start on clearing the canal to asses....'
I'm pretty sure 'assess' was the intended word, but I'm no expert on this subject so I have left it as is for others to enjoy...er, correct.
70.171.3.221 (talk) 08:38, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. After enjoying the wrong word, I've corrected the spelling, but you could have been BOLD and made the change yourself. I'll post a welcome message on your talk page. —SMALLJIM  11:39, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I suppose if you are going to build a new hospital on a flood plain, it makes sense to site it above some old mineshafts. Ning-ning (talk) 16:34, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  '...Work parties have made a start on clearing the canal to asses ...' 

message: There is a pothole outside the train station ugh 2A00:23C8:A75A:9601:5DEE:F1F2:EF5C:8507 (talk) 21:41, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pothole
Talk:HJ Shipbuilding & Construction

message: Who wrote this article? CHI was a shipbuilder that existed in 1930s. 'Hanjin Heavy Industries Co. Ltd' is correct name.
It sounds like an ad  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.162.77.10 (talk) 17:32, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chosun Heavy industries?
Talk:Crenshaw House (Gallatin County, Illinois)

message: This discussion is somewhat incomplete, because it leaves out the fact that free blacks were not permitted to reside in Illinois, and the penalty for doing so was sale into slavery.198.229.212.20 (talk) 23:51, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion of Status of Free Blacks in Illinois
Talk:Kingsteignton

message: I reinstated my Kingsteignton Weather website, which I can only assume was mistakenly deleted by Joe Edworthy when he completely removed the entire external links section. Other external links can be reinstated by interested parties.
As an aside, although I have no interest in football whatsoever, I found the information he added about the Kingsteignton teams to be pretty good. Yet he deleted that too. DaveBrit (talk) 23:40, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Probably worth a mention:
https://rammcollections.org.uk/object/l94/
©Geni (talk) 06:31, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Kingsteignton figure
Category talk:Irish rebels

message: What exactly is an 'Irish rebel'? What do you have to do to qualify? 
Rbreen 20:56, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I was thinking the same myself!--Vintagekits 18:11, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've been doing my best to categorise these people according to the organisations they belonged to/events they were involved in. This is far more objective than labelling them with a term that's hard to define. The same applies for :Category:Irish revolutionaries.--Damac 23:27, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Turán graph

message: Isn't this also known as a complete k-partite graph?  At least Bondy and Murty (1982) call it that.  Perhaps Turan's name was used for this graph after that publication?  Should the article at least mention the name complete k-partite graph? 67.175.166.240 16:20, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think a complete k-partite graph is a more general family of graphs in which the sizes of the parts need not be nearly equal. But I will look into finding a way to work that terminology into the article. —David Eppstein 16:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Triangle-free graph

message: I changed the bound for the A^3 algorithm to O(n^3) instead of O(n^{2.376}).  2.376 is the best-known exponent right now, yes, (see here), but it hasn't been implemented anywhere (this is mentioned on the link), and using n^{2.376} instead of the classical and recognizable n^3 is confusing or misleading to anyone who doesn't follow recent developments in numerical linear algebra. Charibdis (talk) 01:12, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I undid your changes since the article makes no sense after them. In particular, the n3 matrix multiplication algorithm is slower than the m1.41 time bound of the other algorithm, even for dense matrices, so it is nonsensical to say that the matrix algorithm (without the fast matrix multiplication techniques) is an improvement on the other algorithm. —David Eppstein (talk) 02:48, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  re: triangle-finding problem 

message: We need a reference for "An independent set of √n vertices in an n-vertex triangle-free graph is easy to find."  This would imply that the 5-cycle is 3-colorable.  Should it perhaps be the floor of √n ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gruberan (talk • contribs) 21:29, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that except for K2 and C5 it's the ceiling, not the floor. The reasoning is that, if its maximum degree is Δ, then either \Delta\ge\sqrt n in which case we find a large independent set as the neighborhood of one vertex, or \Delta\le\sqrt n in which case by Brooks' theorem there exists a Δ-coloring and one of the color classes is large enough. The exceptional cases for Brooks' theorem are the odd cycles and complete graphs, but the only ones of those that cause any problem are K2 and C5. I agree that a source for this reasoning would be appropriate. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:00, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Independent set of size √n
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Skepticism/List of articles related to quackery

message: This article was nominated for deletion, and was copied here before it could get deleted, in case it happened. The starting copy here is from this version. Please continue to develop it with good sources. If it gets deleted, all record of the original list, its talk page, and all user contributions, will disappear, and we will be left with this copy. Use it and develop it. -- Fyslee 21:05, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relevant notes
Talk:Exmouth

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Support as nom 71.106.183.124 (talk) 03:22, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: Use of the term "regeneration" to describe the destruction of the Strand seems inappropriate. It's a marketing term used by the consultants employed by the council to put a positive gloss on what has been a highly unpopular change. (And similarly, the Council's further "regeneration" plans for the seafront deserve mention... Mhkay (talk) 00:20, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regeneration 
Talk:Elizabeth Griffith

message: I wanted to make a note that there is a lack of in-line citations on Elizabeth Griffith's page. While sources are listed under references, 
where the sources were used in the informational sections is missing. 
Willfm (talk) 16:03, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Source Information

message: I have a question: as there is a Theatre Project, does this article not need a theatre category tag in order to be attached to that project? I understand that the Irish Playwrights tag covers the territory, but my question is about making a connection to a project. scribblingwoman 21:06, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have just added . -BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 01:31, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: The opening claims that E Griffith is best known today for her edition of Shakespeare's comedies published in 1775.  This does not seem to be true, and I can find no record of her editing Shakespeare's comedies.  She wrote The Morals of Shakespeare's Drama Illustrated in 1775, but I don't know that that is her highest call to fame.  See ODNB article by Elizabeth Eger. LLRungegordon (talk) 20:41, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shakespeare
Talk:Mick Barnard

message: Despite the writing credits on early Genesis albums generally being printed as simply "Genesis", this is only for public consumption - by checking in the PRS/MCPS Alliance database, you can see the official legal copyright percentage shares for songwriting credits on everything. This info is not in the public domain, but as a PRS/MCPS I took the time to look it up. Mick Barnard does not own any copyright share on any old Genesis song. On "Twilight Alehouse", Anthony Phillips actually owns a share. Hackett owns a share on every track on Nursery Cryme, and it is actually Collins who is not credited on some of them. It is difficult to satisfy WP:VER on this point, as the info is not in the public domain, however that is no excuse for breaking WP:NOR instead.--feline1 (talk) 18:34, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed -- Wikipedia copyright rules need to govern how this is presented.  Plus, if we attempted to actually track down the actual composers of each piece, we would open an endless can of worms, since Genesis continued to re-use bits of material in their rehearsals and writing for many years.  There are instrumental bits on Trick of the Tail that date back to the "cottage" era when Banks-Gabriel-Rutherford-Phillips were writing.  The new box set has the four long-lost "Jackson" songs that demostrate that bits of the Lamb date to the Phillips days as well.  Furthermore, bits of "The Musical Box" guitar work appear on a 1969 demo tape that Phillips included on his Archive Collection Volume I.  And of course, even after they began to give specific writing credits, the listed author was usually just the composer of the basic song (lyrics, melody, chord structures), and the recorded arrangement included contributions by the whole band. — Lawrence King (talk) 06:23, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Writing credits
Talk:Stonehaven railway station

message: This article, although a stub, is fine as it is. It forms part of a large set of articles which fall into the railway station category.
:Article is so tiny it should be merged into Stoneybrook article.--Light current 21:43, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose - This article as per first poster, this article forms part of the large set of railway station articles. Stewart 22:17, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose - Same as above, no reason for this to be merged. --Dreamer84 00:26, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Shirahadasha

message: User:Shirahadasha
      Run 21:09, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

message: One user participating in this RfA, User:Foundby, was later discovered to be a sockpuppet of the banned User:Endgame1.  Note that his questions concerned how to deal with suspected sockpuppetry. —Dgiest c 19:11, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Post-closing addendum
Talk:Portable Sounds

message: I found this image on toby's website on a banner. I would think it's some kind of Deluxe Edition cover slip, but does anyone actually know?
Jcpizzadude 13:42, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternate Cover? 

message: Alright, the lead single, Made to Love, was the first, followed by I'm for You. One World would be third, then Lose My Soul. The last two are No Ordinary Love and Ignition. But where does Boomin' fit in? I figure probably right after (or before) One World. But then again, I'm probably wrong. Anyone else know anything? Free (talk) (HRWiki) 00:22, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, I think Boomin' was after Made to Love. Free (talk) (HRWiki) 00:24, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Getting the Singles Straight
Talk:Lord of the Beans

message: So once again at a VeggieTales article we find another ridiculous cast list:
For those unfamiliar with how encyclopedia's work, we do not make statements like "Jimmy Gourd as Leg-O-Lamb", because (you ready for this?) Jimmy Gourd is not a real person. Cast and characters should be either presented in an "Actor as Character" format or a "Character, portrayed by Actor" format. The VeggieTales "Character as Character" format fits neither of those formats. See MOS:TV#Cast for more information. I'm preserving the list here, but boldly cutting it from the article as being inconsistent with proper encyclopedic tone. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:30, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Before this page was entirely deleted, I had changed the page to "Voice Actors" (Vischer, etc) and then who they voiced. Something anyone could easily have done. Ckruschke (talk) 18:16, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ridiculous cast list