lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Flora Lion

message: I am the original researcher and writer of the Flora Lion biography which has been wiped out to be replaced by one paragraph purporting to start over on a low-priority biography basis.  The bio represented hours of research in original sources and presents much factual information which could be lost forever unless rediscovered, which given the subject is highly unlikely.  For all its limitations it is all that is available anywhere on the internet.  I will attempt to restore it and hope the vandals leave it alone until they are prepared to improve it.Fishface42 (talk) 02:29, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flora Lion biography wiped out.
Talk:Great Doxology

message: Someone added the  tag to the sentence: "St. Hilary had been banished to Phrygia for four years (c. 356) by the emperor Constantius II because of his defense of the faith against Arianism." The editor left no comment here on the talk page, so I would like to address the issue. It seems to me that the sentence in question is actually a statement of historical fact rather than an opinion. Hilary's banishment was a result of his defence of orthodoxy. Unless someone can show how the statement is POV, or provide a conflicting scholarly opinion, I think the tag should be removed. Any input is welcome. MishaPan 13:43, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's biased. It privileges one doctrine (Athanasianism) over another (so-called Arianism). Jacob Haller 14:06, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: POV-statement
Talk:Haroon-ul-Islam

message: Why some user change the word from "Martyrd" to "Death"? Please respect for the words as used in the context as per the local region, religion etc. Remember, Enclyclopedias are neutral. If you don't like the word Martyrd put in brackets (Death). Muhammad Shoaib 14:42, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: see WP:NPOV for exact details about neutrality. --TheFEARgod (Ч) 12:34, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changing words
Talk:National Limited

message: I today added the (currently second) paragraph about the challenge of the Appalachians on the Limited's route. I rode the train several times in the early 60s and as more occurs to me I'll add it for your consideration and comment. 164.106.201.50 14:45, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Route details 

message: I doubt that the train survived until 1971. It still appears in the April 27, 1969, schedule under the name "West Virginian" (still bearing train numbers 31/32) that ran between Cumberland and Parkersburg only. The equipment ran through from/to Washington, but westbound combined with the Capitol Limited (train 5) and eastbound with the Shenandoah (train 8). The name "National Limited" was gone by then already. No traces of the train can be found in the October 26, 1969 schedule. The "West Virginian" was gone by then, too. --Thogo 18:37, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: You're entirely correct. I've been meaning to add these corrections to the article. Are these schedules online, or in your personal collection? Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:44, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Huh, didn't notice there was an answer, sorry. ;) The schedules are printed in Official Guides that are in my personal collection. --Thogo 17:44, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Survival until 1971??
Talk:Greek Byzantine Catholic Church

message: There is currently an RfC at Wikipedia_talk:Naming_conventions_(Catholic_Church)#RfC:_should_this_page_be_made_a_naming_convention that may be of interest. Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk  23:46, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Catholic Church naming conventions RfC 
Talk:Reflected-wave switching

message: The article says "its amplitude is added to that of the original pulse".  I don't understand.  
Is the following true: "The pulse duration is long enough that the original pulse is still present at the receiver when the echo of the pulse bounces back, hence they add in amplitude."  Not terribly clearly written, but am I close?  
Kentborg 14:51, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I also found the above unclear and a diagram would surely help the explanation. It seems to assume that the microstrip continues past the receiver to a non-terminated end, and the continued length serves as a quarter-wave resonator. This means that the timing of the voltage overshoot depends on the position of the receiver on the microstrip. Does this also mean that the closer a receiver is to the transmitter, the longer the delay before it recognises a pulse? Cuddlyable3 (talk) 09:43, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
Talk:John Aylward

message: Discussion for J.J. Aylward
Often I just go to Wikipedia and skim a filmography.  In his blurb Aylward's work in ER is discussed.  However ER is omitted from the filmography.  Anyone want to fix it? Theresavalek (talk) 17:18, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I haven't found out which character he plays at but he was in Yellowstone please look that up and correct it thank you 72.78.82.17 (talk) 21:24, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  he was in Yellowstone 

message: he played father Bob for two episodes if I could send you the pic I took I would I got it off the IMDb page 72.78.82.17 (talk) 21:27, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: As far as they are under a free license, you may upload it via commons:Special:UploadWizard to Wikimedia Commons. Thanks, A09090091 (talk) 21:31, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yellowstone update
Talk:Ragunan Zoo

message: There are several enterances to Ragunan Zoo. West enterance is one of several enterances. Only the main enterance is interconnect with city-transport facility, TransJakarta Corridor 6 bus. The main enterance is open for entering in all its operating days. Other enterances are open to serve more visitors on peak operating days, such as weekend days or holidays.Antongkwok (talk) 22:51, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Enterances
Talk:Center for International Forestry Research

message: WP:RS and in article WP:CITE SatuSuro 14:44, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Please help

message: This article, as well as the 16 articles on CGIAR and its sub entities in the article's infobox, appear to have been copied directly from their websites, and are written like adverts.  I've totally rewritten one, but most need to be removed and rewritten for copyvio alone, not to mention the fact that they are all incredibly POV.  
If you're looking for a research project, here's a good one.  I'm also removing the "start" tag from these articles, as an unreferenced copyvio doesn't meet "start" criteria.  T L Miles (talk) 17:13, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Single source / Press release /copypaste

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.cifor.cgiar.org/about-us/science-for-forests-and-people.html, http://www.cifor.cgiar.org/about-us/our-vision-and-aspirations/cifors-strategy-2008-2018/a-strategy-for-a-new-era.html and other sources. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:57, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Permission verified; content restored. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:44, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: The two organizations merged into one on Jan. 19, 2019. I have updated this on the CIFOR page, but I'm not sure if the two separate CIFOR and ICRAF pages should be merged or if a new page should be created. tellingtales 18:06, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger of Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) and World Agroforestry (ICRAF)
File talk:Starbucks.png

message: There is now one Starbucks in the Netherlands, at Schiphol airport. Obviously the first of many... But anyway, it has a Starbucks and should be colored green. I would do it myself but I have no idea where to start. SergioGeorgini 14:59, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind. I managed. SergioGeorgini 12:46, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Starbucks in the Netherlands

message: There are 4 starbuks now in Amman, i would like you to add it to the map.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Maenshawa (talk • contribs) 04:07, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Starbucks in Jordan
Talk:Constitutional history of Colombia

message: Dear Fernando,
I was working on translating the spanish version of the article with this name and trying to improve it with references, as well as including other things I think are important.  At the moment I have it completely translated and I was reviewing it when I saw this version.  If you compare it with the one in spanish, you will see this one is just a brief summary.  I hope you don't mind including things from your version in mine.Andrarias 20:57, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:Orthodox yeshivas

message: Why is this category called "Orthodox yeshivas"? Is there another kind? The lead article is just  called Yeshiva. --Redaktor 15:01, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, not because there is no other kind (The Conservative Yeshiva being the most prominent counter-example) but because Category:Yeshivas should exist on its own, inclusive of any institutions that consider themselves yeshivas, Orthodox or no.--DLandTALK 13:26, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Proteinopathy

message: How about cystic fibrosis? Should that be on the list? Bendž|Ť 15:02, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: note

message: Suggest the link to gain-of-function research be removed. Toxicity of proteins has nothing to do with gain-of-function research.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.126.3.193 (talk) 03:29, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: note
Talk:List of Guggenheim Fellowships awarded in 1966

message: There are many years of these list of Guggeheim Fellowships that have not been wikified.  I can understand why because of the tedious chore of puttng asterisk before each names.   Has any wiknet designed a software that can asteriskized before each name automatically?   Pjt48 15:05, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Quasispecies model

message: Hi. I have added a citation to a reference that already existed in the text (now it is Ref #1 & #15 ("molecular quasispecies (1988)");  How do I re-use the same reference again and remove the duplicate?.
omermar 08:05, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: re-reference

message: Could somebody please clarify in the Alternative Mathematical Formulation section 
the approximation \dot{n}_i\approx n'_i-n_i, thanks! Posted March 2, 2008.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.90.180.147 (talk) 14:03, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: n'_i is mentioned in the article as the new state after reproduction. The change per generation time is then n'_i-n_i. --Flinz (talk) 11:29, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled

message: This page is rather technical; can someone who is an expert with the mathematics make it a little more accessible by either adding a section or providing a clearer explanation?  As a biologist I'm not certain I'm qualified to translate it, though I think I understand. OcciMoron 15:10, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I am not an expert on the math but I spent a few years working in a lab with a couple of guys who were, and I think I picked up enough in discussions to make a reasonable English-language description.  I've inserted a blurb at the top and added the section "Simplified Explanation". IdahoEv (talk) 08:54, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Technical/Accessibility 

message: The article uses versions of the phrase "the fitness of an individual genotype becomes meaningless" three times.  This is a silly simplification of an observation about the functioning of a quasispecies.  The genes that contribute to the survival of the quasispecies are fit; that is the definition of fit.  The more fit the genes that make of the quasispecies, the more fit the quasispecies itself.
There is a true point to be made about the interaction of genes within the quasi-species.  No individual gene is capable of self replication, so it is the combined effects of these genes that contribute to survival.  This does not appear to be the point the article is making.  This is still fitness of the individual, because the quasispecies is the environment of the gene.    Randall Bart    Talk   20:25, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Meaningless
Talk:Second Fleet (Australia)

message: Rated as start, needs to be checked to upgrabe to B Pustelnik (talk) 14:01, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rating

message: I refer to reference 2. "Our Austral.". The Argus (Melbourne, Vic. : 1848 - 1956) (Melbourne, Vic.: National Library of Australia). 27 January 1940. p. 8 Supplement: The Argus Weekend magazine. Retrieved 27 January 2012.
The Argus does not reference its article, so the information presented can only be taken on face value. A more contemporary source for the same information seems required.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bookly (talk • contribs) 01:02, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-contemporary reference problem
Talk:Internal standard

message: — Assignment last updated by RS UBC800 (talk) 21:00, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: My main priority in improving this article is identifying more sources that support its current claims and to add in-text citations that show what references each piece of information corresponds to. I will discuss chromatography and ICP-MS in more depth and expand the article with information regarding ICP-OES. There is also an opportunity to rearrange and reformat the article, including moving GC-MS examples to the section on chromatography. If warranted, I will add relevant images to this page as well. Whishhper (talk) 07:18, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: CHEM 300
Talk:Dumb Britain

message: What happened to this page? It used to be so good (if uncited). Surely saying it's from Private Eye is enough?--193.52.140.6 15:21, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

message: ... it's been cannibalised!
I move to restore all the old information here. GWP 10:01, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  I agree... 

message: Using examples here comprises at best spam and lack of content, and at worst copyright infringement. I am merging it with List of regular mini-sections in Private Eye. Jdcooper 17:46, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Using examples
Talk:Court of Cassation (Belgium)

message: The article on the French Cour de Cassation speaks - rightly in my opinion - of "quashing" the disputed judgment rather than "annulling" it. Might it not be better to use "quash" rather than "annul" in the Belgian case too? Everybody got to be somewhere! (talk) 17:23, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello, I basically rewrote (and seriously expanded) the entire article over the past month. I mostly used the word "annul"; I don't know whether the choice for either word makes an important difference though. Do you think the "annulling" should be replaced by "quashing" everywhere in the article? --Brentjee (talk) 01:40, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Annul or Quash 

message: Hello everyone, sorry if the history tab is a bit of a mess, but I've rewritten and seriously expanded the article over the last month. If any cosmetic corrections are in order, do not hesitate. Same if you spot any mistakes (but I don't think there are any right now). I've also tried to properly reference all parts of the article, and due to the large amount of references I've divided them into three headings (legislation; journal articles and publications; other references i.e. websites). User:TAnthony, you put up a template asking for more references about a month ago. Given that I've added about 50 sources in the meantime, can I remove the template? Kind regards, --Brentjee (talk) 01:40, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major revision (and expansion)
Talk:Stymfalia

message: What do you think of adding the following picture to this article, a map of the region of Corinth, from the Greek wiki? Darth Viller (talk) 15:06, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Map

message: I have marked this article as in need of an update; excavations performed by Orlandos were incomplete, and new research from the Canadian Institute has rendered a lot of information presented in this article inaccurate or incomplete.  Hector Williams has published further information on the "Lower Town" and substantial information on the sanctuary in particular was published in 2014.  Moreover, to properly present these findings in this article I would suggest that it perhaps be divided into more precise sections beyond the extant "History" section.  I will try and make these changes myself in the coming weeks/months; any (cited) help would be very much appreciated. Cuneiform Prattler (talk) 18:31, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Work needed
Talk:Boxy an Star

message: What about some sample of its "futuristic vernacular style", all within fair use, perhaps from the book jacket or promotional material? --Error (talk) 16:15, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sample
Talk:Palace of Justice, Brussels

message: It seems you got "approximately 1.1 million Euro" from an online converter, but this is a meaningless figure: today a large one family home with pool and 2nd flat in the basement will cost one million Euro, while this palace would cost today more like 150, 300 or even 500 million Euro if it is a state building project. Probably the 45 million BEF in the article are BEF from 1870, so you can't just convert them to Euro with an online converter. The rule against OR has a function: that no one can make up something senseless and just write it in WP. So if you don't have a serious source about the relation in value between BEF of 1870 and BEF of today, better you don't write anything at all.  2003:F5:6F06:DF00:41D2:1EBA:1630:84C5 (talk) 20:05, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  approximately 1.1 million Euro
Talk:2-Norbornyl cation

message: Hello. I will be adding a lot more sections to this article in the next few days: I have done a lot of research and would like to make this page even better. I am happy to take any comments/suggestions on how to make this page even better!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jcal730 (talk • contribs) 07:35, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Major Additions, December 2013

message: I think that the figure on norbornyl brosylate solvolysis is very informative. Unfortunately the paper by Winstein/Trifan cited (doi:10.1021/ja01176a536) does not actually investigate endo-norbornyl p-bromo-benzenesulfonate but simply states that investigations are underway. They instead use the endo-tosylate. Would you be able to either change the figure to account for this or provide the citation for a later paper in which the endo-brosylate is discussed?
Would you be able to change the carbon in the acetate to more accurately depict its geometry. It is typically not drawn in a linear fashion.
Finally, could you add the racemic indicator to all three main structures in this figure?
If you do not have time to make these edits, I'd be happy to do them if you send me the source code for the figure.
I also find the second figure in the original article quite informative. Jcal730 (talk) 19:35, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Norbornyl brosylate solvolysis.png

message: Further evidence for the non-classical model was obtained by tracer studies in which two carbon atoms in the norbornyl skeleton were replaced by the radioactive carbon 14 isotopes (Scheme 4) . The primary solvolyis reaction product was derivatized by reduction with lithium aluminium hydride and oxidation with sodium permanganate to the dicarboxylic acid followed by a Curtius rearrangement expelling carbon dioxide. When the acetyl anion is indeed able to attack both C1 and C2 positions of the symmetrical norbornyl cation 2 then 50% of the generated CO2 will contain 14C. The experimental value in this experiment was 40% and in order to account for the presence of 14C in other positions (a scrambling process) the nortricyclonium cation was postulated which is basically a face-capped norbornyl cation allowing hydride shifts.
Jcal730 (talk) 16:22, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs citation to go back in article
Talk:Romanov impostors

message: By my opinion, these people were impostors, not claimants.
Claimant, as is in Wiktionary, is "One who claims; one who makes a claim."
Impostor is "Someone who attempts to deceive by using an assumed name or identity."
Maria Vladimirovna, Grand Duchess of Russia is claimant to Russian throne , because she can be Empress of Russia. Other claimant is Nicholas Romanov, Prince of Russia, because he can be Emperor. Both are descendants of czars and validity of their claims depends on different views on law. And of course, both are not impersonators.
But people like Alexis Brimeyer, sentenced by court to jail for impersonating, are only impostors and impersonators.--Yopie 17:19, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Impostor or claimant 

message: Well done ! It's a good thing the article has been changed from Romanov Claimants to Romanov Impostors. "Claimant" signifies that they have some legitimate claim, that is not the case with any of these people. They were all impostors and the vilest was Franziska Schanzkowska.
The change in the article name was long overdue.
Well done !
Tovojolo (talk) 22:47, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Romanov Impostors

message: The link on the page is to 'the wrong person' - impostering the imposter? Also the paragraph needs restructuring (Marina could not marry herself). Jackiespeel (talk) 16:43, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Michael Gray
Talk:Access Industries

message: Hello, I am new to wikipedia, and not 100% up on the formatting.  If I have made a mistake, please contact me, I will respond immediately.  Thanks, NY Smitty
Nysmitty 15:50, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

message: https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/business/story/2020-02-06/warner-music-group-files-for-ipo-in-the-latest-sign-of-music-industry-resurgence
https://www.billboard.com/articles/business/8550416/warner-music-group-ipo-valuation-share-price-analysis
There are reports that Access industries will make a decision over WMG to go public with an IPO.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:640:C600:3C20:6426:3707:415:677E (talk) 23:57, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Warner Music Files for IPO in 2020

message: https://www.fiercebiotech.com/biotech/rare-disease-biotech-passage-bio-nabs-deerfield-management-veteran-as-ceo
https://www.genengnews.com/news/gene-therapy-developer-passage-bio-files-for-125m-ipo/
This is a second IPO filing Access Industries has made in 2020.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:640:C600:3C20:E031:31D5:7631:B0A2 (talk) 14:00, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Access Industries files IPO for Passage Bio

message: Hi, I work for Access Industries and plan to propose updates to this article and related articles. I'm looking forward to working constructively with the other editors here. As I also explained in my edit summary, since Len Blavatnik is no longer the chairman of Access Industries, as can be seen from the Leadership page of the company's website, I removed that statement from the article as a straightforward, uncontroversial edit. Happy to discuss here if anyone has questions about this. Thanks! C at Access (talk) 13:30, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Len Blavatnik is no longer chairman