lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Khachkar destruction (second nomination)

message: Aivazovsky, why is the page causing problems now? Just leave it as is, I think it's OK the way it is. I don't understand this approach, first the page is created by Artaxiad for targetting and propaganda against Azerbaijan, next evidence of destruction in Armenia is provided, now both Aivazovsky and Artaxiad (who created the page) in tandem demand its deletion. Why? Folks, Wikipedia is not a propaganda machine, the article in its current state seems agreeable to me. We should rather make improvements to it. Atabek 07:18, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:TVN (Australian TV channel)

message: I've added some content to this page however it lacks reability - I need to return to clean up. Abeorch 23:42, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Cold War (Code Lyoko episode)

message: I do not see any citations, references or third party views on this subject. I note that most if not all wikilinks are to the core subject matter. It needs rewriting so that non-fans can understand the context. Lastly, the "...quotes" section; I guess ya had to be there, dude... LessHeard vanU 21:47, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  re Notability tag 

message: Why is this particular article any less notable than all the other episodes? The Watchtower 16:50, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clear this up please
Talk:Michail J. Makarenko

message: While I was actively surprised that every story that I read about Makarenko named him “Michail” rather than “Mikhail”, this is what they did.  He seems to have used “Michail” as his chosen transliteration from the Cyrillic.  Hence, I am restoring this page to the name that Miss Minerva gave it when she creäted it.  Mikhail Makarenko should be a redirect, as should Mikhail J. Makarenko. —SlamDiego 07:43, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:List of Mars-crossing minor planets

message: In the second paragraph the Martian perihelion distance is given as 1.58 AU, but this is incorrect as it is ~1.38 AU. The reference cited does not specify 1.58 AU as the Martian perihelion distance but rather the minimum perihelion distance for a shallow Mars crosser.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.169.114.163 (talk) 15:58, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Martian Perihelion Distance 

message: So, what is the reason for including a minor planet here? I counted a little under 1100 objects from the list.
List of minor planets tells there are 5750 mars-crossers. That means little over 4500 are missing here.
The article states "The known numbered Mars-crossers are listed here", but I think List of minor planets only has the numbered ones. 109.240.153.46 (talk) 20:46, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: There are 21,644 Mars-crossers of which only 5751 are numbered. The last MCA is 2021 SN and the last numbered one is 585874 (2019 WT2). The list was originally generated when there was a much smaller number. Most of the MCAs numbered above 100,000 will simply not be noteworthy asteroids. -- Kheider (talk) 21:27, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  reason for inclusion? 

message: New paper suggests they are more frequent on Mars: https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.02614 John_Abbe (talk) 21:57, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Frequency of significant impactors in dispute?
Talk:Singapore Open (badminton)

message: Cancelled, redirected here. Zoglophie (talk) 03:26, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  2020 Singapore Open
Talk:The Mormons (band)

message: I'm not convinced that this band meets WP:MUSIC's criteria for inclusion. The band has received one article in an independent, reliable source, a small write-up in LA Alternative, and an article in a student magazine. The band has a bare-bones All Music entry, a brief review in PopMatters, and some random mentions in various online sites. Seems like a borderline case. --Muchness 07:52, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: WP:MUSIC concerns
Talk:Loyang View Secondary School

message: The Arena segment should be removed, as this might cause hatred by Raffles InstitutionTimothy 06:56, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved.  Number 57 23:11, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Loyang Secondary School →  – Per the new official name of the school: https://www.loyangviewsec.moe.edu.sg/ 2406:3003:2000:3EBE:C1FE:ECBE:96FB:D850 (talk) 03:09, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 27 October 2021
Talk:3CR Melbourne

message: As per either a recent request at section for assessment requests or because this article was listed as fully or partly unassessed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/Assessment I have just now completed a rating of the article and posted my results to this page. Those results are detailed above in the template box. Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, I am unable to leave detailed comments other than to make the following brief observation: is a stub as per article namespace tag  However if you have specific questions, please write to me on my talk page and as time permits I will try to provide you with my reasoning. Please put my talk page on your watchlist if you do ask such a question because in the case of these responses I will only post my answer underneath your question. ALSO if you do not agree with the rating you can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it.--VS talk 08:03, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment completed for [[{{BASEPAGENAME}}]]

message: * https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/3CR_Melbourne  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.211.147.228 (talk) 20:31, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  * https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/3CR_Melbourne
Talk:Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property

message: The list of members is quite hard work to follow, and will need to be updated as countries join (or even leave?).  How about a link to http://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ShowResults.jsp?treaty_id=2 or http://www.wipo.int/pct/guide/en/gdvol1/annexes/annexa/ax_a.pdf, on the WIPO website, which will be updated by WIPO as the list of memebrs changes?82.25.124.92 (talk) 18:24, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point. I have removed the paragraph, which was almost illegible. The link to List of parties to the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property is sufficient IMHO. Thanks. --Edcolins (talk) 19:41, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link for list of members?
Talk:36 Quai des Orfèvres (film)

message: MR73, though another cop drama by Olivier Marshall with Daniel Auteuil, is not a sequel to 36 Quai des orfevres. Check for instance the name of the character played by Auteuil in the two movies on the Imdb. Hence, I remove the reference to MR73 as a sequel to 36 in the main page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.169.222.176 (talk) 16:00, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:St Martin's Church, Canterbury

message: Can no one add a photo of the church itself, instead of a load of Victorian graves that could be anywhere? Johnbod (talk) 00:26, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Oosoom Talk 20:01, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo 

message: This statement has so many problems, I don't even know where to begin. First, it's unverifiable as to whether it's the "oldest church in the English speaking world." There are older church sites within Britain that could compete for that claim. Second, people didn't speak English when it was founded! They spoke various Brythonic languages, or Latin, or some form of Anglo-Saxon, or Old English, or Middle English, but they didn't speak English as we know it, so it's silly to list that right in the title as it's claim to fame. And There are much older Christian sites in England, for example, Faversham Stone Chapel which dates to Roman times, so unless anyone has objections, I'm going to change this. Florimell1919 (talk) 15:50, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oldest Church in the English Speaking World? 
Talk:Lochiel, South Australia

message: Hello from the Great White North!  I marked a passage in this article as needing clarification today, but after having had a skim of District Council of Port Wakefield, it appears to me that the text in the Lochiel article should refer to Port Wakefield rather than just "Wakefield".  However, I'll leave this for an Aussie editor to validate and make the change.  Cheers! PKT(alk) 17:31, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "District Council of Wakefield"
Talk:The Thomas Jefferson Hour

message: The final sentence seems off, specifically the "brave" and "tomatoes" part.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.134.5.121 (talk) 00:20, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

message: Revised: Christopher Ursich (talk) 12:00, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outline of content to be added
Talk:Asymmetric cut

message: I've reverted removal of the link from the publisher name "Amacom" to the American Management Association. Please do not remove this link; it is informative. I did not myself know that "Amacom" was an arm of the American Management Association until I researched the matter while adding references to this page. Please leave the link in place so that readers who wonder (as I did) what "Amacom" is will not have to reinvent the wheel.
—Syrenka V (talk) 04:09, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of publisher link
Talk:Craig Melville

message: This article just looks like a resume at the moment - interesting as it was created by a user who's first edit was to create this article and only edits since have been to link to this article.  The TV shows and music videos are certainly notable, but I'm not sure if this implies that Craig Melville himself is.  It would also be nice to have some free text, rather than just a few lists. -- Chuq (talk) 01:14, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Wye College

message: can someone get all my changes back? I made masses and read a whole book on the sage of Wye College. All seems lost because a 'bot' did not like a link to wordpress.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.145.250.41 (talk) 22:26, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: One of 30+ articles created/edited for pay. I have tagged this for COI; the tag can can come off after an independent editor reviews for NPOV and sourcing.  Please leave a note here when you do that. Jytdog (talk) 05:16, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I Batterbu wrote most of this, and I was a humble student there once with no other conflict of interest. I read the book mentioned about the saving of the village.  188.30.193.152 (talk) 17:31, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: a) since you are the creator you should not remove the COI tag.  b) the COI tag is not due to your editing. Jytdog (talk) 18:05, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: COI

message: User:79.66.124.255 about these changes - you need to base changes on reliable sources.  Please see WP:VERIFY and [{WP:RS]].  Please discuss, if you don't understand.  Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 00:22, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sourcing 

message: the following entries to the "notable people" section are unsourced:
* Carolyn Hardy OBE, VMH; BA 1952; Chair National Gardens Scheme 1979-1986 and vice-chair Royal Horticultural Society for 10 years 
* Prof. David Leaver, Professor of Agriculture at Wye, and then Principal and Chief Executive of the Royal Agricultural College (until 2007).
* The gardener Christopher Lloyd, BA 1949, and lecturer until 1954.
* John Seymour, alumnus. Widely published exponent of self-sufficiency and small scale farming.
* Prof. Eunice Simmons, Pro Vice Chancellor Academic, Nottingham Trent University. (MSc & PhD Wye, Senior Warden of Withersdane Hall, and Lecturer until the mid 2000s)
-- Jytdog (talk) 23:30, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced 

message: I have restructured the article removing some duplication, hopefully to make slots for new material and sources. User:Ed1964|Ed1964]] (talk) 15:11, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restructure
Talk:The Original Battle Trolls

message: I've just finished re-writing the page (oy, headache!), and removing all but one image from the (lengthy) list.  The remaining picture needs a copyright attachment, and/or replacement with a more copyright-friendly image (it also needs to be downsized a bit, obviously) but I don't know how to do that without making a mess of things). 207.81.138.180 08:56, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I've helped a bit (and found some sources), but to everyone, read the extended image syntax for how to downsize the images. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 06:41, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm glad to see someone finally made this its own article.  I was just about to. I just added some more information and will eventually take a photo of some of the Battle Trolls from my personal collection. Cale 20:36, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleaned up the Article 

message: I was wondering if it should be renamed The Original Battle Trolls. "The Original" is pretty small, but it's definitely part of the entire name.  I might copy all of this article's info into a new one if that's the best way to go about it, and redirect this one. Cale 20:36, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Name Change
Talk:Paranormal romance

message: This article could use a few specific examples of the genre- Nitpyck (talk) 05:25, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Examples whether listed or described may help define the scope. So Undine (novella) and The Little Mermaid (novelette) should be considered. I wouldn't call those stories or their female characters "paranormal" and borderline examples do help define. See the next section --P64 (talk) 17:57, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  I hate lists- but 

message: This article defines "paranormal romance" broadly regarding its adjective, so that it is not a subset of paranormal fiction. I am not comfortable with that, it doesn't seem useful to me, but it may be how the term is used. We should explain.
This is a notice of my long comment at Talk:Paranormal fiction#Scope. --P64 (talk) 17:57, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Scope
Talk:Ciutadella de Menorca

message: Wrong information...
In 1558, the Turks under Barbarossa entered and decimated the city.
But Barbarossa (Ottoman admiral) died in 1546.
:I agree. The admiral of the Turkish navy was Piyale Pasha who was backed by Turgut Reis. This can be checked in the articles Turgut Reis and Piyale Pasha. I am going to edit the name of the admiral accordingly. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 12:31, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Herne Bay High School

message: Added some information, corrected some vandalism ("smells a bit" a few times on the page), edited the info box and removed the bit about the school rebuild as it wasn't in encyclopedic style.  If anyone knows about the Building Schools for the Future rebuild that might be useful?  If I get time to pop back and continue I will do. Joncojonathan (talk) 19:46, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sir Roger Manwood's School

message: There is no such thing as a Grant Maintained school in the UK today - this category of school was abolished in 1998. Does anyone know the actual status of the school today? It would be good to get this corrected. Timothy Titus Talk To TT 04:32, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A quick look at the link in the article give me "In 1999 the School assumed Foundation status" Pickle 16:34, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Status of School 

message: This is a major secondary school in Kent, and an ancient and very historic educational foundation. I am unsure why it has been tagged as possibly not notable? In any case, everyone else seems just to have ignored the tag since it was placed here several months ago. I propose that the notability tag be removed, but I'm inviting comments from others before I do so. [Incidentally, I am entirely independent of the subject - I have no connection with this school of any sort.] 
Timothy Titus Talk To TT 21:12, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: I cleaned out the Alumni section which was overlong. It's a good rule of thumb that if someone isn't notable enough to have their own article on Wikipedia, then they're not notable enough for an alumni list. I also removed entries such as Jules Laurens, who obviously has many talents, having been listed twice by anon IPs, as an erotic novelist and as a trainer of showjumping rabbits. I move the following here, since it's plausible that they may get articles at some point in the future :
86.31.189.25 (talk) 10:58, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alumni 

message: The recent additions are rife with notability issues, sourcing issues, and formatting issues.
We are taking the time later to wrangle this list into a tighter factual bulleted list.
Thanks for helping edit Wikipedia, Saintstephen000 (talk) 23:15, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent additions, Alumni
Talk:AvantGo

message: removed advertisement tag - I see nothing in the article that is not NPOV. Those who disagree could at least comment here on what's wrong. The "user can" statements might be reworded, but those are not "advocating" or "selling" the system. I've almost completely stopped using the system and have no interest in promoting it. It *was* my PDA "killer app" before getting live data service, but I rarely use it now.
Samatva 09:17, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What's not NPOV?

message: AvantGo was founded in 1997 - based in San Mateo.  It quickly grew to nearly 400 employees and went public on September 28, 2000.  IPO price was $12/share and it closed the day up $8 at $20/share - with a market cap of nearly $1 Billion.  On Dec 12, 2002, the company was sold to Sybase for $38Million - only a bit more than the cash it had on hand.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.180.34.69 (talk) 22:37, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Founded, went public and acquired 
Talk:Venetian mask

message: This article needs more pictures to help describe the various masks.--83.254.140.40 (talk) 13:17, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures 

message: There's definitely some POV issues with this article. It seems unlikely to me that the view of Medieval Venice as an objectivist's wet dream is the only one presented by historians.
It's not Medieval Venice as a whole that is being characterized, but the social occasions on which Venetian masks were worn. The statements here are fairly broad and general- used to disguise social status to allow participation in activities to some degree transgressive= perhaps very much or just slightly. I don't really see the problem.--WickerGuy (talk) 15:10, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 

message: The Carnival_of_Venice article contains a whole section about the different types of masks, while the Venetian_masks article (where it would belong) does not contain such information about the masks. Since the Venetian_masks article is linked at the beginning of the text about the masks, it might be wiser to move the mask type description from Carnival_of_Venice to Venetian_masks  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.194.115.191 (talk) 13:55, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  missing information that is misplaced in other article 

message: I thought this should definately be part of wikiproject italy, I've rated it as start for obvious reasons and I haven't rated its importance because simply, I don't know its importance to italy or outside italy.  I think its as important as the Carnival of Venice in some ways, but perhaps not because its a peripheriphal of that topic El.numbre (talk) 19:54, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikiproject Italy 

message: This article states that Il Canovaccio in Venice supplied the masks for "Eyes Wide Shut," however, the Web site of Ca' Macana, another Venetion mask-maker, states that it was the supplier of the masks.
There may have been more than one shop. However, the one listed is verifiable from independent (thrid-party) sources.--WickerGuy (talk) 15:08, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Who supplied masks?
Category talk:People by behavior

message: there are only 2 kinds of people? Cannibals and vegetarians? LOL --V. Szabolcs 09:24, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Still a pretty interesting cat in 2011 -- "Duelists, Groupies, Hermits...Humanitarians, Nazi hunters, Necrophiles..." Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky) 23:31, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: "...Activists, Ascetics, Beggars, Cannibals, Criminals, Duelists...Raw foodists, Squatters, Travelers..." Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky) 08:15, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: ...Barefooters, Beggars, Birdwatchers...Hermits, Hoarders, Hobbyists...Storm chasers and Streakers...Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky) 21:48, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
Talk:Native Tongue (Elgin novel)

message: “Of course, there are other equally valid ways of interpreting the results of Elgin's experiment: that women find their natural languages entirely adequate for self-expression; or so forth.”
Isn’t that exactly what she said?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jikybebna (talk • contribs) 13:56, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Of course 

message: — Assignment last updated by Wakingtiger (talk) 16:40, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Science Fiction
Talk:2007 Chinese Grand Prix

message: Why was Hamilton not penalised for dangerous driving whilst behind a safety car in wet conditions?
The re-analysis of the incident proved enough evidence to withdraw the penalty against Vettel, but why was the penalty not delt to Hamilton?
This issue must be adressed either here or in the 2007 Japanese GP article, its non-inclusion is propegating misinformation.
Its also worth mentioning that comments made by Hamilton about his treatment in Formula One during his debut season are unfounded. His off-track relationship with Alonso and penalties delt to McLaren have no bearing on how he, as a driver, has been treated by anyone else, in fact, the opposite is true in that he recieves a deserved ammount of praise for his debut season.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.190.196.150 (talk) 06:03, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: No penalties for Hamilton

message: Won't Alonso still be able to win the championship if he finishes 1st and Hamilton 2nd as they'd both have the same number of race wins? Marky-Son 16:21, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Correct. Although I'd dread attempting to verify related articles if there was then an Alonso win and Hamilton retirement in Brazil. 82.13.151.148 22:57, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2 points 

message: Didn't he crash with 29 to go? Meaning he crashed on Lap 27, not 24?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.8.107.97 (talk) 21:51, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sutil

message: I tried to improve the race summary, with a better description of the events that led up to Hamilton's retirement, which are barely covered in the current version.  Unfortunately, it was deleted within a minute because somebody deemed it original research.  Since when was writing a race summary original research?  The current summary has no citations, why isn't it original research too? 140.147.11.55 (talk) 19:35, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleted race summary 
Talk:Shiloh (Foote novel)

message: Hmmm . . . I'm thinking this article deserves to be of "Middle" importance, even if the quality is debatable.  Shelby Foote is one of the most well-known and respected Civil War historians in the U.S., and this book offers a cogent summary of his views while being a rip-roaring good read. Cranston Lamont 03:21, 21 March 2007 (UTC)