Talk:IPhoto

message: All those features but it can't rename files...  Ojw 15:48, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: can't rename files

message: http://store.kopykake.com/cgi-bin/oldstore/KJSPE.html
I've been doing some research and it turns out that the iPhoto name was brought from Ulead. Anyone care to put up the history about this. Uleads iPhoto is now the ever popular Photo Impact after the Apple buyout. --Shrimpcrackers 08:23, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  iPhoto name was brought from Ulead's iPhoto Express and iPhoto Plus 

message: Sure it can. It can rename the file name itself ("dumbname_001.jpg"), or you can give it a title that will be used within iPhoto. To rename the file itself, just click the image, click the "info" button in the bottom left, and make the necessary adjustment. Of course, the file name is largely irrelevant in iPhoto. Title, keyword, date, and other meta-data is more useful for searching, sorting, etc. Just don't dig through the ~/Library/Pictures/iPhoto folder and try to find and edit the file name manually. That would be hard to do, because of how iPhoto internally organizes the photo library. Nothing on a Mac is hard to do, so it is clearly the wrong way to do things. If you ever find something hard on a Mac, take a step back and try a different approach or use the built-in help menu -- you'll often find an easier way. 
For example, to import a photo from a website, you could control-click the photo and select "Save to desktop", close Safari, click on Go in the Finder menu bar, select Applications, double-click on iPhoto, click on File, click on Import, navigate to the deskop, select the photo, click open. 
Or, you could click and drag the photo to the iPhoto icon in the dock. 
It's up to you, really. 
--Kwnd 17:41, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Macs are easy, silly 

message: I did a bit of a re-write. Hope everyone likes it. Basically, I just wanted to clean things up. Kudos to previous contributors; I didn't have to add much at all. I did add a few links, but mostly just reorganized things a bit. --Kwnd 22:00, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-written 

message: Did Apple skip a version number, or is this an omission on the page?
: Ummm, I have iPhoto 3. It was bundled with many Macs, but never was downloadable or shipped as part of iLife. T3h 09:27, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Removed the mention of iPhoto 3.  If iPhoto 3 really existed, would you mind providing us with a source?  AlistairMcMillan 21:41, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yeah, Ulead iPhoto Express 3. Remember Apple brought the name from Ulead.--Shrimpcrackers 08:23, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

text: They jumped from 2 to 4 to keep the version numbers among all the iLife apps the same (presumably). This isn't true for Garageband, and later iWeb, so perhaps it's to distinguish the original apps from the later ones. Who knows, it's part of the Mac mystique ;) Kewpid 02:50, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

text:  According to the MacRumors iPhoto guide, that is exactly what happened. There never was an iPhoto 3. http://guides.macrumors.com/iPhoto .  Additionally, MacTidbits concurs that iPhoto 3 was never released outside Apple, but they mention the fact that there was a Help document included in iPhoto 4 entitled "What's New in iPhoto3" http://db.tidbits.com/article/07556  Curtis 00:42, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  No iPhoto 3? 

message: :Image:IPhoto Icon.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:08, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:IPhoto Icon.png

message: :Image:IPhoto6.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 19:44, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:IPhoto6.jpg

message: iLife 09 has not shipped yet. Although we can make a reasonable guess the final version will be 8.0, we do not have that in evidence. We also do not have a final build date. At a minimum, if these are going to be in the article we need references. I have been referred to the MOS on this, but I don't see where it says we should describe products not shipping as already released without references. --Steven Fisher (talk) 17:18, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: If you looked at my actual edit you would have discovered what my reference to the MOS about date linking was about, ie placing   around months and years, not about anything you're saying above nor was it specifically aimed at you. Nja247 (talk • contribs) 20:34, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right. I must have compared the wrong revisions. Thanks for the pointer. --Steven Fisher (talk) 02:29, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  iLife 09 

message: 1. iphoto 8 runs on tiger also
2. the iphoto 8 in the list ("bundled with ilife 9","face recognition") is in fact iphoto 9.
85.179.19.67 (talk) 20:24, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  iPhoto 8 : some errors 

message: Is there any value at all in saying what programs iPhoto is most often compared to?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.23.113.12 (talk) 15:59, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comparisons 

message: Hello.
Since Apple's 'Get a Mac' ads have been focused on iPhoto (more specifically, Faces) lately, I thought that people may come looking for more information. I've noticed that people have quite a bit (good and bad) to say about the new Faces feature.
For example, macworld (granted, perhaps not the most unbiased source in the world), had good things to say about the ability to recognize even blurry faces, and pictures taken of a child in different stages of her life, but also bad things about its tendency to identify "flowers, bottles, and other inanimate objects" as people, as well as making mistakes that even cross gender.
Is it worth mentioning any of this? The good and the bad? 209.90.134.252 (talk) 20:35, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should this include criticism of the 'Faces' feature? 

message: Why does the first paragraph say that iPhoto was first released in 2002? In the Version History section, it says that iPhoto 1 was released in 2001. Harmelion (talk) 12:51, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ummm