lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Bharhut

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:52, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition 

message: The Bharhut remains in the Kolkata Museum have a dark brown shiny polish, that makes it hard to get good photographs. This polish, apparently some chemical substance, was not there when the sandstone remains were excavated, as you can see from the photos of the excavation. The polish many have darkened with time. Are there any records that show what is the material applied and if it can be removed? 
Incidentally this polish is not there in the panel in the Freer Gallery of Art. 
Malaiya (talk) 23:29, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Polish on Bharhut remains in the Kolkata Museum

message: The word "Hindu", was unknown in India then. I have not come across the use of term "Hindu" with a meaning with the exclusion of Buddhists (and Jains) before the late 19th century British census, and the definition given by Bal Gangadhar Tilak. It appears that the concept of religions being mutually exclusive and mutually incompatible was not common in ancient India.Malaiya (talk) 23:46, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: "Shungas are known to have been Hindu monarchs"
Talk:Bhartruhari Mahtab

message: Note:  Project Banner with Orissa workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Orissa or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 07:01, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Orissa Addition 
Talk:Bhatt

message: Is the surname Bhatta a variant of this? (For example Jayarasi Bhatta and Kumarila Bhatta.) Rigadoun  (talk) 18:51, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Bhatt is an entirely different clan from the Bhat (the latter normally pronounced as Bhaat). Hence the following line is incorrect/irrelevant and should be removed, as it creates confusion: 
"Bhat were also known to keep genealogies of Rajput kings. The most common surnames for the Bhat caste are Barot, jaggas and Rao." 
For example, Barots, jaggas and Rao are entirely different clans and have nothing to do with Bhatts. I am surprised that someone has mixed in everything here.—Preceding unsigned comment added by  (talk • contribs) 
:It'd be nice to have a source for that.  WLU 02:14, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bhatt and Bhat are different. 
Talk:Bhau Daji

message: I removed the notability template because (a) he has an entry in the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica, over half a column long, (b) Mumbai's oldest museum is named after him. David Brooks (talk) 18:52, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: I believe this page should be merged with another page written on the same topic: Bhau Daji Lad. 
I have a bit of a concern over the spelling of the last name. In this article it is spelt 'Laud'. At the museum named after him, it is 'Lad'. Can we add the name in Devnagri script as well to clear any confusion?
Also, the meaning of this sentence in the "Medical career" section is a unclear: "He also tested the value of drugs to which the ancient Hindus had ascribed marvellous powers, among other pathological subjects of historical interest investigating that of leprosy."
Can someone rephrase it? Rohini (talk) 21:04, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging and  other issues 

message: can you explain this change you did on the page? Link was going to the page of republic of India, that is, India and I wanted to fix it in Indian which is for the people who have Indian ethnicity. Can I make these changes here? -- Harshil want to talk? 05:57, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Indian will bring you on a disambiguation page. The correct link is Indian people. But generally we put Indian. Indian people is also OK. --Gazal world (talk) 06:20, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can you explain this change?
Talk:Maharaja Krishnakumarsinhji Bhavnagar University

message: . Pranjal Joshi (talk) 09:16, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Needs sources before it can be added, see WP:ALUMNI. --Muhandes (talk) 10:00, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable Alumni
Talk:Bhilala

message: Indian government publications are often not reliable for caste, just as the "states" series of People of India should also be avoided. They tend to plagiarise Raj era sources without attribution and they tend to be infused with political considerations, rather as happened with the NCERT controversy. - Sitush (talk) 10:10, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Government publications
Talk:Bhimtal Lake

message: Note:  Project Banner with Uttarakhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Uttarakhand or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article  --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 13:19, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Uttarakhand workgroup Addition 
Talk:Indian Airlines Flight 410

message: I think this article can't be a biography due to WP:1E. I suggest retitling it as 1978 Indian Airlines Hijacking. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 09:19, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Suggest naming it to Indian Airlines Flight 410 if it doesn't, meet WP:1E . Username006 (talk) 04:37, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: welp it's now Indian Airlines Flight 410 🔥HOTm̵̟͆e̷̜̓s̵̼̊s̸̜̃🔥 (talk・edits) 00:07, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page title
Talk:Bhotiya

message: Note:  Project Banner with Uttarakhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Uttarakhand or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article  --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 13:19, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Uttarakhand workgroup Addition
Talk:Bhajji (Food)

message: Can anyone explain why this article is at 'Bhujia' when that isn't even mentioned as an alternative spelling in the article itself?  It seems to be a vastly minority usage.  TSP 15:49, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location 
Talk:List of astronomical interferometers at visible and infrared wavelengths

message: This page is quite non hard-core astronomer unfriendly.  I can recognize a few of the wavebands but the rest are mysteries to me.  And attempts to lookup wavebands in Wikipedia seem to return nothing (maybe a shortcoming in wikipedia).  I would like to suggest that a complete review of the article be done to identify terms which may only be well understood by astronomers and provide links to (or create) pages for definitions that can be interpreted by people with a good science education but a lack of training in the sub-discipline of astronomy.  For example -- what frequency ranges are the J H and K bands (among others) include! -- this could easily be resolved by the creation of a wikipedia "wavebands" page.  It is useful to not that if one is going to include an informative table -- one should provide links to explanations for what the columns are discussing (to the best extent possible) for non experts to be able to follow the discussion.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by RobertBradbury (talk • contribs) 17:12, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Wavebands

message: It would also be useful to have a multi-part discussion of the limits of interferometers.  Part (a) would discuss the math involved in reconstructing reasonable images; part (b) would discuss the limits that are required to detect objects of certain sizes at certain distances.  For example -- how far apart would the detectors need to be (at what distances in terms of l.y.) to actually see the construction of the Pyramids on earth?  Or the Empire State building?  And of course how far apart or at what distances could advanced technological civilizations actually "watch" individuals walking around on the streets of New York? (assuming solar-system scales) where the information might be quasi-real time -- but not galactic scales where the information would be ancient history.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by RobertBradbury (talk • contribs) 17:23, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Limits

message: PRIMA has now been officially abandoned by ESO so it should not appear anymore in the list.
On the other hand, PIONIER is available on the VLTI with 4 telescopes and should be added.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.47.252.106 (talk) 13:59, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: List
Talk:Bicholim

message: Bicholim_conflict Is this a hoax ? -- Raghith 04:58, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bicholim conflict. --Horcrux92 (talk) 16:16, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: May be Bicholim natives can provide more authentic on this matter. -- Raghith 06:22, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

text: This Goa:Into the Mainstream is a reference given.-- Raghith 08:43, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  About a Hoax 

message: : Bicholim is a city and a municipal council in North Goa district in the state of Goa, India. It is a town in the territory of Goa ....
Is the bold phrase purely redundant, or does 'town' and/or 'territory' mean something distinct from what's mentioned in the first sentence? —Tamfang (talk) 20:21, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Five years went by. I removed it. —Tamfang (talk) 23:34, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  a city in the district in the state, ''and'' a town in the territory?
Talk:Bidar Sultanate

message: Would user:Gulejane45 care to explain why they continue to remove the Bosworth source and the information it supports? Their information "Azerbaijani Turk" is unsourced. --Kansas Bear (talk) 03:34, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of reference and referenced information 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) BilledMammal (talk) 15:32, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Bidar Sultanate →  – Bidar Sultanate is a PoV fabricated named, whereas Barid Shahi dynasty is more common per Ngram . Note the fact that Ngram is not even available for Bidar Sultanate. Imperial[AFCND] 13:37, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 5 May 2024
Talk:Bihar Movement

message: I am going to write whole article again. join me. --Nizil (talk) 22:31, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: whole article re-written to support upcoming DYK with Nav Nirman movement article.-- Nizil (talk) 18:51, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: edit

message: Nothing 103.49.116.203 (talk) 08:18, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jo moment 

message: अंजली  2402:8100:259A:8670:0:0:33DE:5ED (talk) 14:40, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  राजनीति समाजशास्त्र अर्थशास्त्र हिंदी कलास12 

message: Anjali 2402:8100:259A:8670:0:0:33DE:5ED (talk) 14:41, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  राजनीति समाजशास्त्र अर्थशास्त्र हिंदी कलास12 

message: राजनीति समाजशास्त्र अर्थशास्त्र हिंदी क्लास 12 2402:8100:259A:8670:0:0:33DE:5ED (talk) 14:42, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  राजनीति समाजशास्त्र अर्थशास्त्र हिंदी कलास12
Talk:Henninger Brewery

message: I suggest changing the article's name to 'Henninger Brewery' to be specific.  The name is in much broader use.  It's easy to adjust links to 'Henninger' in the articles referenced herein, and it's unlikely that there are many other links to this page. James J. Peterka 03:16, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bihari Muslims

message: —Preceding unsigned comment added by Islamuslim (talk • contribs) 21:13, 29 March 2010
looks like the BJPs , Communists and Christian Missionaries have pissed all over this article.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.93.161.219 (talk) 06:33, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Please assume good faith. While there may be editors with anti-Islam motivations, the vast majority of your fellow editors, myself included, are here to write an encyclopedia and nothing else. Edit warriors, on either side of a dispute, are not tolerated for very long. Your personal observations are not verifiable and can't be used to support claims in the article. If your observations are widely held, there will be reliable sources which make those same observations. If you want to improve this article, find those sources and add content based on those sources. Cheers, Celestra (talk) 16:25, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit Wars 

message: Pasting in blocks of unsourced text in place of the existing text is not reasonable. The infobox is a nice addition, though the information is largely unsourced. The other changes remove criticism and a wikilink (which admittedly should be moved to a See also section.) Can you please cooperate to include your positive additions and corrections without this wholesale replacement? Thanks, Celestra (talk) 15:21, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent changes 

message: CELESTRA ...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.93.202.24 (talk) 10:16, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: None of that seemed to have anything to do with improving the article, so I removed it per WP:TALK. I reverted your edit from yesterday because it made several detailed claims without sources. Please provide sources for the claims which you make in the article. Thanks, Celestra (talk) 15:13, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  IP editor 

message: They are quite active on this page. Please can somebody clean this article. Thanks Triplespy (talk) 10:58, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Christian Missionaries
Talk:Bihu dance

message: V 103.120.59.14 (talk) 13:32, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bihu dance
Talk:Bijoy Krishna Handique

message: I've reorganized the biography  sections, however, there is not much about his pre-Parliament work, and sections for early work before he became a Minister of Mines. The school creation thing needs context (how did he start the school? what work did he do before then?) The bulk of the Minster of Mines section contains controversial information.  The article should be just a summary of his major work in Parliament, with some chronological aspect over the particular terms. This information should be compressed and summarized better with sufficient references, and then rewritten in a neutral, balanced tone.  Once that's ready you can resubmit for copyediting. -AngusWOOF (talk) 19:28, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The references should be redone in cite web format instead of "all the references can be found here" or "more information can be found here" links. -AngusWOOF (talk) 17:44, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs neutrality and referencing 

message: It might be helpful to list his career highlights using Lok Sabha subsections:
10th Lok Sabha (1991) 
11th Lok Sabha (1996)
12th Lok Sabha (1998)
13th Lok Sabha (1999)
14th Lok Sabha (2004)
15th Lok Sabha (2009)
16th Lok Sabha (2014) (if he plans for re-election and is successful)
Why is Rajya Sabha mentioned in Volume 3 2004-2014? -AngusWOOF (talk) 12:15, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: He did not get re-elected for the 16th Lok Sabha (2014):  -AngusWOOF (talk) 22:00, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Sectioning by Lok Sabha

message: I moved this section here as it contains POV statements and needs to be completely rewritten. -AngusWOOF (talk) 18:17, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy over mines 
Talk:Biju Janata Dal

message: Note:  Project Banner with Orissa workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Orissa or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 07:00, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Orissa Addition 

message: This article is a load of crap. It's full of unsubstantiated claims, namecalling, and other partisan drivel. I would write something more intelligent myself, but I'm afraid I know nothing about these people.Kelisi (talk) 15:58, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rubbish
Talk:Biju Patnaik Airport

message: Note:  Project Banner with Orissa workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Orissa or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 07:25, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Orissa Addition 

message: There's an IP vandal who is repeatedly removing Chennai from the destination list of AirAsia India. , , , . The reference cited clearly lists Chennai for the entire winter schedule, despite that this IP repeatedly removes Chennai from the list. It's probably time to protect the page from further disruption by these IPs who I believe is the same user. — LeoFrank  Talk 05:01, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  IP vandal removing Chennai from AirAsia India 

message: Why is there no mention on Terminal 3? Someone20111 (talk) 09:46, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terminal 3 
Talk:Bikaner Camel Corps

message: * "was dismounted in 1974 and underwent conversion into standard infantry"
* "is the only camel cavalry operated by present day armed forces"
Pick one. You can't have both. --BjKa (talk) 13:07, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  What now?? 
Talk:American Congress for Truth

message: Are there references which confirm this organization's notability?  Right now the only source on the page, is the group's own website. --NovaSTL 03:19, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "American Congress For Truth" gets 51,000 hits on google . I started this page some days ago and I have not had much time to develop much as I am working on other articles, but I should get to this in due time.--CltFn 04:14, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: This article easily meets notability guidelines. Please don't redirect it to other articles.
In addition to meeting the "Google test" and other criteria, the organization's web site includes the board of directors which is mostly composed of notable people: R. James Woolsey, Jr., Paul E. Vallely, Walid Phares, Kenneth R.  Timmerman, Robert Spencer and John Loftus. This list should be included in the article (I may work on it some day).
It's true that the article needs more elaboration, but redirecting it is plainly wrong.
-- Gabi S. 16:34, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability (2) 

message: Hello. According to its website, the organisation has changed its name to ACT! for America Education. It should therefore be moved. If nobody objects, I'll eventually move it, Ajnem (talk) 08:15, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  ACT! for America Education
Talk:Bilkis Dadi

message: The lady is notable enough, though I agree as WP: BLP1E. I have accepted it in its current state and to flagged for cleanup. It is a borderline acceptance and I feel it is useful to allow the community to decide. Fiddle Faddle 19:32, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Acceptance at AFC 

message: This could use some citation and copy edits. Aditya(talk • contribs) 07:15, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some improvement
Talk:Birla Public School

message: Note:  Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 06:47, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition
Talk:Birla Vishvakarma Mahavidyalaya

message: DUPLICATE = http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birla_Vishwakarma_Mahavidhyalaya  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sanlight (talk • contribs) 22:15, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

message: . 103.251.217.164 (talk) 01:45, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  KBIT ( Faculty of engg & tech. MSU ) 1890 is the first engineering collage in Gujarat.
Talk:Bishapur

message: Name of this article should be changed to "Bishapour". Because "pur" in "Bishapur" can be read like "a" in "also". But is should be read like "u" in "ruin" or "o" in "who". Shkuru Afshar (talk) 22:35, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changing name of the article to "Bishapour"
Talk:Bitra

message: Note:  Project Banner with Nagaland workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Lakshadweep or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  Amartyabag  TALK2ME 10:52, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Lakshadweep Addition 
Talk:Randy Bass

message: Being that it's just one person's opinion, there can be no question that it doesn't belong on Wikipedia, right?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:2D80:5503:2400:C407:F373:CDBD:9112 (talk) 00:58, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, the tone of that note is way off.  If there's sources out there that indicate as such, I think there's room in the article to discuss to what extent there was any sort of deliberate efforts to prevent him from breaking the record.  As it stands now, the notes section is all unsourced conjecture 2601:249:600:62D0:59E1:41F9:9F55:1D78 (talk) 04:32, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Someone put an opinion-filled note at the bottom of the page
Talk:Betawi language

message: For the example kaga, it is spoken kaga and not kage, maybe this is non betawi but can anyone can confirm this 125.164.17.92 (talk) 01:44, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anyone can confirm things 
Talk:After the Rain (film)

message: The reception section erroneously refers to a review of an adaptation of a manga series whose title is merely the same in English: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/After_the_Rain_(manga)
Do we have accurate info to replace the mistaken info? 2601:1C0:4400:3090:21C9:8B50:E6B5:8FEB (talk) 17:23, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception section has the wrong info.
Talk:Furuhata Ninzaburō

message: I've noticed that the Japanese episode list has completely different titles than this page. I'm planning to update this page with the Japanese titles, but I'm wondering if it's worth keeping the English titles as well. Do they come from anywhere in particular, or are they mostly colloquial? Planetbox777 (talk) 19:34, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title Sources
Talk:Bodoland Territorial Region

message: I would like to request experianced wikipedians to kindly create a map for Bodoland highlighting the current BTC districts and the proposed districts for the new state.
Swift User 72 (talk) 07:04, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for new Bodoland map 

message: The information in Protected tribal belts and blocks in Assam seems to relate to the history of this region. Jbh Talk 16:35, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Weak oppose on the grounds that its unclear that the area or scope is equivalent. I've added a 'see also' to the history section in order to establish a link, but I think that more evidence for their equivalence is needed before merging. Klbrain (talk) 07:23, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merge

message: Why the German language map of India use in this page shows India inside China ? BodoSingh (talk) 23:25, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why the German language map of India use in this page shows India inside China ?