Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Queensland/Archive 1

message: Perhaps something should be put onto this page to let people know that this project is now covering its scope. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 10:07, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If you have a change in mind, my advice is just make it then put it up for discussion if you think it might be controversial. Chances are it probably won't be. This goes for just about any change in here - in creating this I really just copied what we'd done at WP:NSW to make sure we wouldn't reinvent the wheel, but nothing's set in stone. As for scope - one big reason for incorporation is that I felt that the Sunshine Coast, Pine Rivers, Logan etc needed the same attention as the Gold Coast and in a larger sense are quire able to be grouped with it as urban entities near or impinging on Brisbane. Orderinchaos 14:18, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link from former Wikiproject:Gold Coast 

message: I'm thinking articles from WikiProject Brisbane should also be tagged for this project - it's one extra parameter in , and my bot could get it done relatively fast. Opinions? Dihydrogen Monoxide (H2O) 07:03, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you do that for WikiProject Townsville articles? It would save a bit of work. WikiTownsvillian 10:44, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm running the Brisbane one now, and I'll do Townsville afterwards (I didn't know there was a project). Could I get a link to the main category (a la :Category:WikiProject Brisbane articles)? Dihydrogen Monoxide (H2O) 09:39, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

text: Category:WikiProject Townsville articles. WikiTownsvillian 09:43, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

text: Cheers.  I'll run it next time I get the chance; it's about halfway through Brisbane now.  If you like, you can request another bot do it.   runs one that can do this sort of thing.  Or you can wait for me :) Dihydrogen Monoxide (H2O) 09:57, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, forget about CO - but yeah, you can ask for someone else to do it if you're inpatient. Dihydrogen Monoxide (H2O) 09:58, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

text: A Botop.  The bot is running now. Dihydrogen Monoxide (H2O) 08:53, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  - All Brisbane articles done, I'll do Townsville now. Dihydrogen Monoxide (H2O) 06:50, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Brisbane articles 

message: I just completed a substantive re-write of Federation Walk, which had been seemingly abandoned for some time. I'm no longer local having relocated back to the US so I'm sure there's some information I've missed so I'd appreciate any other eyes interested to have a look at it. I realise it's only "supported" by WP Queensland, but I'm assuming some locals might have some information to add. Thanks! Travellingcari (talk) 04:20, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Federation Walk]] 

message: As you may have heard, we at the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial Team recently made some changes to the assessment scale, including the addition of a new level.  The new description is available at WP:ASSESS.
*The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.  
*The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.  
*A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.  
Each WikiProject should already have a new C-Class category at :Category:C-Class_articles.  If your project elects not to use the new level, you can simply delete your WikiProject's C-Class category and clarify any amendments on your project's assessment/discussion pages.  The bot is already finding and listing C-Class articles. 
Please leave a message with us if you have any queries regarding the introduction of the revised scheme.  This scheme should allow the team to start producing offline selections for your project and the wider community within the next year.  Thanks for using the Wikipedia 1.0 scheme! For the 1.0 Editorial Team, §hepBot (Disable) 21:18, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes to the WP:1.0 assessment scheme

message: Wikipedia 0.7 is a collection of English Wikipedia articles due to be released on DVD, and available for free download, later this year. The Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team has made an automated selection of articles for Version 0.7.
We would like to ask you to review the articles selected from this project. These were chosen from the articles with this project's talk page tag, based on the rated importance and quality. If there are any specific articles that should be removed, please let us know at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.7. You can also nominate additional articles for release, following the procedure at Wikipedia:Release Version Nominations. 
A list of selected articles with cleanup tags, sorted by project, is available. The list is automatically updated each hour when it is loaded. Please try to fix any urgent problems in the selected articles. A team of copyeditors has agreed to help with copyediting requests, although you should try to fix simple issues on your own if possible. 
We would also appreciate your help in identifying the version of each article that you think we should use, to help avoid vandalism or POV issues. These versions can be recorded at this project's subpage of User:SelectionBot/0.7. We are planning to release the selection for the holiday season, so we ask you to select the revisions before October 20. At that time, we will use an automatic process to identify which version of each article to release, if no version has been manually selected. Thanks! For the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team, SelectionBot 22:37, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia 0.7 articles have been selected for Queensland 

message: I thought this WikiProject might be interested. Ping me with any specific queries or leave them on the page linked to above. Thanks!  - Jarry1250 (t, c) 22:14, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Milestone Announcements

message: Hi!  I'd like to draw your attention to the new WikiProject coordinators' working group, an effort to bring both official and unofficial WikiProject coordinators together so that the projects can more easily develop consensus and collaborate.  This group has been created after discussion regarding possible changes to the A-Class review system, and that may be one of the first things discussed by interested coordinators.
All designated project coordinators are invited to join this working group.  If your project hasn't formally designated any editors as coordinators, but you are someone who regularly deals with coordination tasks in the project, please feel free to join as well. — Delievered by §hepBot (Disable) on behalf of the WikiProject coordinators' working group at 06:22, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinators' working group 

message: This is a notice to let you know about Article alerts, a fully-automated subscription-based news delivery system designed to notify WikiProjects and Taskforces when articles are entering Articles for deletion, Requests for comment, Peer review and other workflows (full list). The reports are updated on a daily basis, and provide brief summaries of what happened, with relevant links to discussion or results when possible. A certain degree of customization is available; WikiProjects and Taskforces can choose which workflows to include, have individual reports generated for each workflow, have deletion discussion transcluded on the reports, and so on. An example of a customized report can be found here.
If you are already subscribed to Article Alerts, it is now easier to report bugs and request new features. We are also in the process of implementing a "news system", which would let projects know about ongoing discussions on a wikipedia-wide level, and other things of interest. The developers also note that some subscribing WikiProjects and Taskforces use the display=none parameter, but forget to give a link to their alert page. Your alert page should be located at "Wikipedia:PROJECT-OR-TASKFORCE-HOMEPAGE/Article alerts". Questions and feedback should be left at Wikipedia talk:Article alerts.
Message sent by User:Addbot to all active wiki projects per request, Comments on the message and bot are welcome here.
Thanks. — Headbomb {ταλκκοντριβς – WP Physics} 09:35, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:Article alerts|Article alerts]]

message: I've just created this, and I'm slowing adding this category to applicable articles.  I'll probably eventually add subcategories as other region categories do, but at this point I'm not rushing. :-)  I also don't quite agree with the NW Qld region article being named Gulf Country, but that's another issue altogether.  If anyone notices me doing anything obviously stupid in regards to the new category, feel free to slap me about and point me in the right direction.Johnmc (talk) 10:33, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Good job, looks fine. There might be more electoral divisions to add. If you want to change the name start a discussion on the Gulf Country talk page about moving it. A name change to North West Queensland might be best so that the overlap into NT can be excluded from the article.- Shiftchange (talk) 23:41, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Creating "North West Queensland" category. 

message: This article was created by User:Johnpaullangbroek -- not the actual politician, but almost certainly another sockpuppet of Universe Daily (see Wikipedia:Long term abuse/Universe Daily for details). I've cut this article back to a stub because of reliability concerns; I invited editors here to have a go at expanding it into a useful, reliable article. --A. B. (talk •  contribs)  21:44, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: redirected to John-Paul Langbroek. -- Mattinbgn\talk 21:53, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[John Paul Langbroek]] 

message: I was wondering what other project members believed were this projects 5 highest priority tasks. I would list getting the following done.
#Queensland to Good Article
#Economy of Queensland to B class 
#Mary River to B class History of Queensland to B class
#Geography of Queensland to B class
#Mackay, Queensland to B class
- Shiftchange (talk) 22:06, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Priorities

message: Last month I tried to fix Brisbane Busway stations that were listed in both a parent category and a subcategory. I found in that case there was another overlap with the :Category:Public transport in Brisbane that has to be fixed. Earlier this month I found many Queensland power stations listed in both a parent category and a sub-category. I fixed that only to discover another overlap with the :Category:Buildings and structures in Queensland. I have just discovered many :Category:Indigenous Australian communities are listed in subcategories as well. I wanted to bring this to the attention of editors because correcting this over-categorisation is a tiresome task and seems to be systemic. I don't know why this is happening because categories have always been hierarchical. - Shiftchange (talk) 03:15, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Over-categorisation 

message: This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 03:49, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP 1.0 bot announcement 

message: I was trying to fix the bad layout that has occurred since the Assessment Table was expanded, but I wasn't successful.  Could someone else fix it? - Shiftchange (talk) 13:29, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Page layout

message: There is a discussion about the article's name of GLNG, a Santos-led Gladstone-based LNG project. Your input is appreciated. Beagel (talk) 16:59, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  GLNG 

message: I have been assessing the importance of WP:QLD article for a few months now. It is down from 1500 to around 320 with only biographical articles remaining to be assessed.  It would be great if some other WikiProject participants helped with the rest so we can join Western Australia (24 un-assessed articles) as the only other state or territory with assessment complete. - Shiftchange (talk) 10:20, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Big thanks to Commander Keane and anyone else who demolished this backlog.  I'm going to continue rating Brisbane articles and ensure the backlog is tended to from now on. - Shiftchange (talk) 07:30, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessing importance 

message: I've done a bit of work on the article of rugby league and association football coach John Harbin. I'm trying to find out some information on his playing career as well as (presumably) his academic life. One of the refs in his article suggests he studied a teaching degree and he is referred to as a sports psychologist, which seems to suggest he had some sort of tertiary education. Any help would be appreciated. Hack (talk) 15:45, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  John Harbin 

message: Version 0.8 is a collection of Wikipedia articles selected by the Wikipedia 1.0 team for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone.  Articles were selected based on their assessed  importance and quality, then article versions (revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the WikiTrust algorithm.
We would like to ask you to review the Queensland articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (♦) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8 with the details.  You may wish to look at your WikiProject's articles with cleanup tags and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Monday, October 11th.
We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of October, 2010.  As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as One Laptop per Child and Wikipedia for Schools to extend the reach of Wikipedia worldwide.  Please help us, with your WikiProject's feedback! 
For the Wikipedia 1.0 editorial team, SelectionBot 23:31, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Toowoomba and the Sunshine Coast clearly need inclusion and maybe Bundaberg as well. What do actual Queenslanders think? -- Mattinbgn (talk) 00:15, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Toowoomba - definitely, Sunshine Coast - yes, shame it is still start class, Bundaberg - possibly, though the article is a bit of a mess. I would suggest Economy of Queensland as well. In the meantime I will work on Bundaberg, Sunshine Coast, Coral Sea and Q1 to get them towards B class. I notice Torres Strait Islands needs references too. - Shiftchange (talk) 01:01, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Queensland articles have been selected for the Wikipedia 0.8 release 

message: I have created together with Smallman12q a toolserver tool that shows a weekly-updated list of cleanup categories for WikiProjects, that can be used as a replacement for WolterBot and this WikiProject is among those that are already included (because it is a member of :Category:WolterBot cleanup listing subscriptions). See the tool's wiki page, this project's listing in one big table or by categories and the index of WikiProjects. Svick (talk) 21:27, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject cleanup listing 

message: G'day Guys,
Yeah you won the State of Origin. Yeah Lockyer's a legend. Time to move on. I suppose I have to watch AFL or Soccer or something (Lacrosse? Bah).
Can someone please have a look at Petrie Terrace State School? It's an old public school that desperately needs expansion to satisfy notability requirements. If anyone can have a go, that'd be fantastic. -danjel (talk to me) 07:23, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: No evidence of notability provided or likely. I suggest deletion. -- Mattinbgn (talk) 07:30, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmmm positive attitude! The notability can be provided for, because the school is one of the oldest in the state. If anyone else would like to have a go, that'd be great. -danjel (talk to me) 08:24, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Petrie Terrace State School]] 

message: I noticed many articles were citing CHIMS incorrectly (using sessionid, not mentioning the publisher or work, etc.) so I created , very similarly to  and  to ease referencing. I'm going to apply it to the 90ish articles citing this source. I'd be happy to hear any comments. Cheers. --Muhandes (talk) 08:56, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This is handy, thanks for setting it up. Is it possible to add Retrieved on date to this template? - Shiftchange (talk) 06:07, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:Template:cite CHIMS]] 

message: There is a list of articles that need or might need to be tagged with |QLD=yes|QLD-importance=low on their discussion pages.  The list started at 3,422 entries and I have done about a quarter of them over the last 5 months.  Could some other participants in the WikiProject help? - Shiftchange (talk) 14:04, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help wanted 

message: If there are any sport fans lurking around, Wikimedians to the Games is a collaboration drive to improve Australian Paralympic articles, with the most active contributors having an opportunity to go attend the Paralympic Games and to cover the Games behind the scenes with a press pass.  The top two contributors will get their airfare and accommodation paid for. :) The drive official starts on 10 January 2012. --LauraHale (talk) 10:03, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikimedians to the Games 

message: If you're participating or considering in participating in Wikimedians to the Games, you may be interested in attending the events below.  They may provide an opportunity to get information to write a Wikinews article or to take pictures for points on Commons.  If you're not participating, it would still be great to see people attending these events to take pictures for use on Wikipedia and Wikinews.  If you do decide to attend, consider hosting a Wikimedia meetup at the end or the evening of the event, or even just letting HOPAU organisers know you are planning to attend.  If you leave a message on my talk page, I can help you promote the meetup. :)  If you need help with organising attendance because of transport cost issues or accessibility in terms of wanting press access, again please get in touch. :) --LauraHale (talk) 06:56, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Events

message: Bus transport in Queensland has a huge number of proposed mergers going back to 2010. Ewe blokes should sort it out. Cheers mate. Al from NZ. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 09:29, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Better to take this to WP:AWNB. -- Mattinbgn (talk) 22:16, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, consensus may be achieved that way. - Shiftchange (talk) 23:49, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

text: Yep.Ok. Can do. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 00:14, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overdue work 

message: The University of the Sunshine Coast (together with its previous VC/President) has been given a rosy write-up by . . . an employee of the University of the Sunshine Coast. Perhaps some disinterested people here could keep their eyes on this article, whose spam-encrusting has been going on for years. (Cross-posted from WP Education in Australia.) -- Hoary (talk) 00:59, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Continuing self-promotion of the University of the Sunshine Coast

message: Hi folks - anyone with any interest - there is a new Australian project Wikipedia:WikiProject Australian Roads - please have a look. sats 02:02, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Australian Roads

message: There are still many Queensland national park articles with derm.qld.gov.au ext. links in infoboxes, references and ext. links sections which need updating to nprsr.qld.gov.au.  Central Queensland parks have been done as well as various other ones.  Help with this would be great. - Shiftchange (talk) 05:03, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  National parks ext. links 

message: G'day there! Mind having a look at this submission? Cheers, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 17:13, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  AfC submission 

message: You are invited to participate in Wiki Loves Pride 2014, a campaign to create and improve LGBT-related content at Wikipedia and its sister projects. The campaign will take place throughout the month of June, culminating with a multinational edit-a-thon on June 21. Meetups are being held in some cities, or you can participate remotely. All constructive edits are welcome in order to contribute to Wikipedia's mission of providing quality, accurate information. Articles within Category:LGBT in Oceania may be of particular interest. You can also upload LGBT-related images by participating in Wikimedia Commons' LGBT-related photo challenge. You are encouraged to share the results of your work here. Happy editing! --Another Believer (Talk) 20:25, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:Wiki Loves Pride 2014|Wiki Loves Pride 2014]] 

message: Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment on the WikiProject X proposal 

message: Hello everyone!
You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!
Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.
Harej (talk) 16:56, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject X is live! 

message: Our first Australian conference for Wikipedians/Wikimedians will be held 3-5 October 2015. Organised by Wikimedia Australia, there will be a 2-day conference (Saturday 3 October and Sunday 4 October) with an optional 3rd day (Monday 5 October) for specialist topics (unconference discussions, training sessions, etc). The venue is the State Library of Queensland in Brisbane. So put those dates in your diary! Note: Monday is a public holiday is some states but not others. Read about it here: WikiConference Australia 2015
As part of that page, there are now sections for you to:
* indicate your interest in possibly attending the conference (this is not a binding commitment, of course) 
* add suggestions for topics to include in the conference: what you would like to hear/discuss (again, there is no commit to you presenting/organising that topic, although it’s great if you are willing to do so), or indicate your enthusiasm for any existing topic on the list by adding a note of support underneath it
 
It would really help our planning if you could let us know about possible attendance and the kind of topics that would make you want to come. If you don’t want to express your views on-wiki, please email me at kerry.raymond@wikimedia.org.au or committee@wikimedia.org.au 
We are hoping to have travel subsidies available to assist active Australasian Wikipedians to attend the conference, although we are not currently in a position to provide details, but be assured we are doing everything we can to make it possible for active Australian Wikipedians to come to the conference. Kerry (talk) 00:19, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Folks, just letting you know we will not be proceeding with Wikiconference Australia 2015 originally proposed for 3-5 October 2015. Thanks to those of you who expressed your support. You are free to attend the football finals instead :-) Kerry (talk) 08:12, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiConfererence Australia 2015 - Save the date 3-5 October 2015 

message: Hi there!  Wikimedia Australia is organising a meetup on Saturday August 22 at 11am at the SLQ Café in South Brisbane, and we'd love for any Wikipedians living in or near Brisbane or just passing through to come along.  A list of people interested in coming, and a discussion space has been created at Wikipedia:Meetup/Brisbane/8.  Hope to see you there! Kerry (talk) 03:42, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brisbane meetup 

message: Come along! Kerry (talk) 20:30, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Brisbane meetup

message: Hi, Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/The 5000 Challenge and the wider Wikipedia:WikiProject Oceania/The 10,000 Challenge are up and running based on Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge for the UK which has currently produced over 2300 article improvements and creations. If you'd like to see large scale quality improvements happening for Australia and Oceania like The Africa Destubathon, which has produced over 1600 articles in 5 weeks, sign up on the page. The idea will be an ongoing national editathon/challenge for Australia but fuelled by a contest if desirable to really get articles on every state/territory and subject mass improved. After every 100 articles done for Australia this would feed into the main Oceania one. I will start a 1000 one for your state if there is the support. I would like some support from wikipedians here to get the Challenge off to a start anyway with some articles to make doing a Destubathon for Australia and Oceania worthwhile! Cheers.♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:14, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: New 5000 Challenge for Australia

message: Queensland editors' opinions are requested at Talk:Queensland#drum line program to kill sharks. Mitch Ames (talk) 11:00, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  drum line program to kill sharks 

message: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Queensland_Alumina_Limited - any enterprising patriotic QLD editor able to save this from AFD ?  JarrahTree 00:20, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  anyone? 

message: If you are in or near Brisbane, please join us on Sunday 10 December 2017 any time from noon to 4pm at The Edge at the State Library of Queensland. For more details and to sign up, please go to the meetup page. See you there! Kerry (talk) 21:56, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brisbane meetup - Sunday 10 December 2017 at The Edge, State Library of Queensland 

message: If you are in or near Brisbane, please join us on Saturday 13 January 2018 any time from noon to 4pm at The Edge at the State Library of Queensland. For more details and to sign up, please go to the meetup page. See you there! Kerry (talk) 05:26, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Brisbane meetup: Saturday 13 January 2018 at The Edge, State Library of Queensland 

message: The reason I am contacting you is because there are one or more portals that fall under this subject, and the Portals WikiProject is currently undertaking a major drive to automate portals that may affect them.
Portals are being redesigned.
The new design features are being applied to existing portals.
At present, we are gearing up for a maintenance pass of portals in which the introduction section will be upgraded to no longer need a subpage. In place of static copied and pasted excerpts will be self-updating excerpts displayed through selective transclusion, using the template .
The discussion about this can be found here.
Maintainers of specific portals are encouraged to sign up as project members here, noting the portals they maintain, so that those portals are skipped by the maintenance pass.  Currently, we are interested in upgrading neglected and abandoned portals. There will be opportunity for maintained portals to opt-in later, or the portal maintainers can handle upgrading (the portals they maintain) personally at any time.
=== Background ===
On April 8th, 2018, an RfC ("Request for comment") proposal was made to eliminate all portals and the portal namespace.  On April 17th, the Portals WikiProject was rebooted to handle the revitalization of the portal system. On May 12th, the RfC was closed with the result to keep portals, by a margin of about 2 to 1 in favor of keeping portals.
There's an article in the current edition of the Signpost interviewing project members about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.
Since the reboot, the Portals WikiProject has been busy building tools and components to upgrade portals.
So far, 84 editors have joined.
If you would like to keep abreast of what is happening with portals, see the newsletter archive.
If you have any questions about what is happening with portals or the Portals WikiProject, please post them on the WikiProject's talk page.
Thank you.     — The Transhumanist    07:52, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject collaboration notice from the [[WP:WPPORT|Portals WikiProject]] 

message: On April 8th, 2018, an RfC ("Request for comment") proposal was made to eliminate all portals and the portal namespace.  On April 17th, the Portals WikiProject was rebooted to handle the revitalization of the portal system. On May 12th, the RfC was closed with the result to keep portals, by a margin of about 2 to 1 in favor of keeping portals.
There's an article in the current edition of the Signpost interviewing project members about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.
Since the reboot, the Portals WikiProject has been busy building tools and components to upgrade portals.
So far, 84 editors have joined.
If you would like to keep abreast of what is happening with portals, see the newsletter archive.
If you have any questions about what is happening with portals or the Portals WikiProject, please post them on the WikiProject's talk page.
Thank you.     — The Transhumanist    07:52, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Background 

message: Hello! Your WikiProject has been selected to participate in the WP 1.0 Bot rewrite beta. This means that, starting in the next few days or weeks, your assessment tables will be updated using code in the new bot, codenamed Lucky. You can read more about this change on the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team page. Thanks! audiodude (talk) 06:49, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP 1.0 Bot Beta 

message: A new Newsletter directory has been created to replace the old, out-of-date one. If your WikiProject and its taskforces have newsletters (even inactive ones), or if you know of a missing newsletter (including from sister projects like WikiSpecies), please include it in the directory! The template can be a bit tricky, so if you need help, just post the newsletter on the template's talk page and someone will add it for you.
:– Sent on behalf of Headbomb. 03:11, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A new newsletter directory is out! 

message: Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for information on WP1.0 web tool 

message: Hallo 
just south of Staaten River there might be this other river. I ask you to investigate a bit about this neighbour (see map). It might be wishful thinking by the explorers or this river has disappeared since then. --Bahnmoeller (talk) 22:31, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[River Van-Diemen]] 

message: Hello everyone, I created a template  and created a category called, Wikipedians in Mackay. However, since it's empty and unpopulated, it has been proposed for deletion. If anyone here is from Mackay, could someone please add the category.
Your help is very much appreciated. AussieCoinCollector (talk) 20:47, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is anyone here from Mackay 

message: I've had a look at the Google Maps 3D imagery for the area indicated by the coordinates for the Gympie Pyramid article, and compared them to the photo. I can't see anything even vaguely resembling the photo. What gives? -- The Anome (talk) 09:49, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The photo concerned is of Walsh's Pyramid, near Cairns.Nickm57 (talk) 10:27, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: This strikes me as really peculiar; there really isn't any way someone could confuse the two if they shot the image themselves, as the two sites are over 1400 km away from one another. I've nominated the image on Commons for deletion: see here. -- The Anome (talk) 18:38, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gympie Pyramid photograph vs. maps 

message: Hi everyone, I am a student currently enrolled in a subject which requires the improvement of a stub article. I am writing on 'Hetty Johnston', a Queensland politician and child sexual abuse advocate. I would really appreciate your advice and feedback over the coming weeks as our edits and contributions will make up our final grades for the subject. Thank you so much!Husseyp (talk) 10:49, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: ok, but you might need to ping me (what I just did to you) to take a look at it from time to time. Which uni? Which subject? Kerry (talk) 11:31, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Student Assignment 

message: Hi all.
Some time in 2018 the Department of Environment and Heritage Protection (Queensland) got "MoG"-d and is now under a name that I can see has never been created as an English language Wikipedia article.
What do you think we should do here? 
* Simply WP:MOVE "Department of Environment and Heritage Protection (Queensland)" to "Department of Environment and Science"?
* Keep "Department of Environment and Heritage Protection (Queensland)" as a historically important agency with stand-alone article and create Department of Environment and Science with mention of it in that article?
* Add all the history of "Department of Environment and Heritage Protection (Queensland)" to a new article Department of Environment and Science?
Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 12:38, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Our approach federally has been your suggestion #2, but our coverage of state government departments has been fairly limited and IME people have just done #1. Ideally it would be good if we expanded to cover state departments in the same way we do federally, but we're so far from that that it'd be a bit of an oddity if you did #1 here - I'd just move the article. I would suggest that it's not helpful to move extremely generically titled departments to undisambiguated titles - there are a bunch of extremely similarly named government departments in other jurisdictions, it's pure coincidence that there is not already one with that title with a Wikipedia article, and unnecessarily making editors read the article to work out the jurisdiction has always seemed pointless to me (because the title gives no hints whatsoever what the subject is without disambiguation). The Drover's Wife (talk) 16:38, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Option 2 is the best way to go. If the new article for the current department uses , then it can use the preceeding1 field to point to Department of Environment and Heritage Protection (Queensland) which can have an added superseding1 field to point to the new article, so the two are properly related to one another. I note there are preceeding2, preceeding3 up to preceeding6  is there are multiple predecessor departments, and similarly for sucessor departments. Kerry (talk) 01:17, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Before finding this discussion, I did option 1, originally moving it to the undisambiguated title before reading this section and moving the article to Department of Environment and Science (Queensland). Per the referenced annual report, it appears to have been just a straight rename and reconfiguration. I have no connection to Queensland whatsoever. I found out about this situation because of my edits to Proserpine River, which were inspired by this edit to Proserpine, Queensland. That page is only on my watchlist because of boosterism that also affected the Townsville [page,  which I'm only watching because of this (much of the text relevant to that edit was later removed). I've had to do updates long after the fact to Western Australian articles, too. Graham87 16:42, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:Department of Environment and Heritage Protection (Queensland)]] is now [[Department of Environment and Science]]  

message: If nobody comments at
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Environmental_threats_to_the_Great_Barrier_Reef#Good_article_reassessment
in the next few days I am going to delist the article as no longer good. Chidgk1 (talk) 12:39, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Duh I forgot I cannot because it is community reassessment. Please could someone decide and close this. Chidgk1 (talk) 08:45, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Environmental threats to the Great Barrier Reef 

message: Hello. I was wondering if someone from this WikiProject could provide feedback on this rough draft User:Sydneycastle/sandbox. I am an employee of the company and would like independent feedback as to whether the draft can be improved. Any comments would be very much appreciated. The strongest sources that I believe establish notability are The Australian August 2021, Courier-Mail September 2021, Australian Financial Review August 2021, Financial Review July 2021, Australian Financial Review November 2020, and Money Magazine (AU) July 2021.
Thanks very much in advance for your thoughts. Sydneycastle (talk) 22:15, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Feedback on draft