lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Roberto Carlos (disambiguation)

message: Looking at the links to this page all but 2 are football related. Furthermore, there's currently 116 links to Roberto Carlos da Silva compared to 24 to Roberto Carlos (singer). Finally, a Google search for "Robert Carlos" football yields 2,950,000 results  while "Roberto Carlos" MPB only yields 182,000 . I can't help but wonder on what basis some editors are deciding that the two names are equally (or near equally) expected by users searching for, or editors linking to, "Roberto Carlos". --Daduzi talk 00:19, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Then search in Portuguese. I googled for "Roberto Carlos" and, from the first 10 results, 8 were about the singer. Here in Brazil, he is far more famous than the football player; mention the name without a sports context, and pretty much anyone will think of the singer. - Stormwatch 18:10, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That would be a good argument for disambiguation on the Portuguese Wikipedia. This isn't the Portuguese Wikipedia, however, and as such it's notability in English speaking countries that counts. And in those countries the singer is virtually unknown. --Daduzi talk 18:26, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is totally unnecessary. Alexsanderson83 (talk) 22:12, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

text: I definitely agree, thought it was weird that Roberto Carlos needs disambiguation. I will redirect to the footballer page, and move this page to a disambigation page. If anyone objects then please state here. Thanks.Feudonym (talk) 21:06, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is disambiguation really necessary? 
Talk:Joseph B. Davol

message: kinda confusing what to do hereDni 00:32, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Particularism

message: I think there should three different 'particularism' pages.
"Particularism (multiculturalism)" or "Particularism (cultural theory)"
"Particularism (epistemology)"
"Particularism (ethics)"
The ethics one doesn't exist yet, but for now, could somebody who knows how to do it split the first two apart?--Figureground 00:34, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. Right now this page merely combines several stubs. (And someone has added a few more stubs since the above request.) It's a problem because the meaning of the word is quite different from one usage to the next. Hmoulding (talk) 15:11, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Cashflow 101

message: Should the Boardgeek site posted at the external links below allowed? Looks like advertising to me.
:This has been hashed out before on other topics.  BoardGameGeek is a freely-available board game database that is funded by one banner add per page.  It even has its own Wikipedia entry, if you'd like to check it out. Val42 02:55, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Board Game Geek

message: A criticism section could be added. Some people have said that the game is a gimmick which offers no useful training in finance. I'll try to get sources for that Amit 04:34, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism 

message: I have removed the link to the profit advisors page. It has very little advertising, but doesn't really add any value to the page- the review is simply a description of the game similar to that provided here. WotherspoonSmith (talk) 12:25, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed profit advisors "review" link
Talk:List of Seattle Seahawks starting quarterbacks

message: I've added a new section to the page, focusing on the main quarterbacks in an attempt to address the concerns above. Please comment on it and how it should be used in the sucession boxes. --Don Sowell 22:24, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: New section

message: I'd like to list the dates of the first and last start for each QB, but there seems to be some difference of opinion on this information. SPecifically, the first start date has been removed from the list and replaced by the years the QB served. I'm thinking all of this information is good, but I'm not sure how to present it appropriately. Please discuss! --Don Sowell 22:20, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: First and last start date

message: I am going to change the table to the type that is on the Colts, Bears, and others starting Quarterback pages. Southwood Paul  (talk)  19:33, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Table
Talk:Harry Steinfeldt

message: Both articles are about the same individual.  Someone could determine which of the two spellings of the last name is accurate, and then merge the data from the inaccurately spelled name into the accurately spelled one.  Badbilltucker 00:47, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:Free BitTorrent clients

message: Looks to me like there's a conflict between the categories:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:BitTorrent_clients
and
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Free_BitTorrent_clients
Azureus for example counts as both, yet is only listed in the smaller Free BitTorrent Clients section.  It would be better I think to have a single pool for all BitTorrent Clients and then handle the free software issue as a subset.  Having a complete list would be clearer for the unitiated, and perhaps help in the construction and maintenance of a client comparisons page much like those for other software types such as Web Browsers.
--John Muir 00:55, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I just came on this page to say the same thing. I agree with John's comment. Let's reduce to just the BitTorrent_clients category and leave detail of whether free or not in the article (usually in the info box on the side). Especially because it's not clear whether 'Free' in the latter category title means free as in beer or speech. Oska 09:09, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Free software BitTorrent clients must have a "Free ..." category to be in.  Otherwise, they would go in the general :Category:Free software, and right now we're trying to break that category down because it is too big already.  One alternative would be to have a "BitTorrent implementations" category and put the free software BitTorrent implementations into a broader category such as "Free p2p software"? Gronky 10:34, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Conflict?

message: www.utorrent.com needs to be added to the list.
:uTorrent is not free software, it's proprietary freeware. Gronky 10:34, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  utorrent needs to be added 

message: what about Ares also! The new ares downloads torrents!
what about turbo torrent? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nachomanco (talk • contribs) 20:05, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Do those packages come with source code that recipients can modify and redistribute? i.e. are they free software?  If so, go to the artcles about them and add: ":Category:Free BitTorrent clients". Gronky 00:22, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Turbo torrent
Talk:Homer Public Library

message: Re: tagging the article: I could have sworn that I pointed out during the last AFD that there are numerous sources (albeit mostly print sources and of a localized nature) referring to the library during the 1940s–1960s era, which mostly agree that it was somewhat astounding that a community as small and remote (as Homer was at the time) could have such a high-quality local library.  I realize that they aren't as easy to find as the sources already found in the article, but this article is certainly overburdened with mentions of a "15 minutes of fame" episode.  Too much of Wikipedia is a curious snapshot in time as it is. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions  02:40, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Tag
Talk:ESFP

message: I just deleted the descriptions on all of these personality types.  A lot of them were copyvios from different sources, several of them being from http://www.geocities.com/lifexplore/ , where they may or may not have been copied from other locations.  Nonetheless, the three theories of MBTI, Keirsey Temperaments, and Socionics are quite different and require different descriptions of types, functions, relations, and other concepts.  Socionics especially differs from the other two.  The three theories should all be expanded upon in Wikipedia, but it is impossible to do this while there is a conglomeration of these three theories and they are treated as one and the same. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 00:59, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Type Descriptions 

message: I created templates for text that's the same across all 16 MBTI type articles to eliminate the hours of work it takes to update the same text 16 times. This is a recommended use for templates according to Wikipedia policy WM:TEMP. 
To edit the templates: 
1. Click the Edit link on the section of the article you want to change. 
2. Select and copy the title of the template page (the text between the double braces). 
3. Paste the copied text into the Wikipedia search box and press Go (not Search). 
This will take you to the template. Make sure that the changes you make to the templates are appropriate for all 16 MBTI type articles! (ENFJ, ISTP, etc.) ThreeOfCups (talk) 03:35, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Templates 

message: The MBTI, Keirsey Temperament Sorter, and related Jung Typology assessments use the original spelling, Extraversion, rather than the modern corruption, Extroversion. In this context, Extraversion is jargon and should be thus spelled. ThreeOfCups (talk) 15:02, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling of Extraversion 

message: For a discussion about the logo and border color, see Talk:Myers-Briggs Type Indicator#Remove or keep the fancy logos from the articles?. Please don't make a significant change to the logo or border color without discussing it there first. ThreeOfCups (talk) 19:35, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo and border color 

message: The other recreational pseudo-psychology systems Socionics and Enneagram of Personality have only a single article. In the meantime it would be beneficial to remove the references of "notable persons of this personality type" seeing as the Myers–Briggs_Type_Indicator is make-believe. 104.228.101.152 (talk) 02:12, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reduce to one article 

message: You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Myers–Briggs Type Indicator#Redirects and a new hatnote.  Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:18, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion at [[Talk:Myers–Briggs Type Indicator#Redirects and a new hatnote]]
Talk:ISFJ

message: I just deleted the descriptions on all of these personality types.  A lot of them were copyvios from different sources, several of them being from http://www.geocities.com/lifexplore/ , where they may or may not have been copied from other locations.  Nonetheless, the three theories of MBTI, Keirsey Temperaments, and Socionics are quite different and require different descriptions of types, functions, relations, and other concepts.  Socionics especially differs from the other two.  The three theories should all be expanded upon in Wikipedia, but it is impossible to do this while there is a conglomeration of these three theories and they are treated as one and the same. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 00:59, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Type Descriptions 

message: I created templates for text that's the same across all 16 type articles to eliminate the hours of work it takes to update the same text 16 times. This is a recommended use for templates according to Wikipedia policy WM:TEMP. 
To edit the templates: 
1. Click the Edit link on the section of the article you want to change. 
2. Select and copy the title of the template page (the text between the double braces). 
3. Paste the copied text into the Wikipedia search box and press Go (not Search). 
This will take you to the template. Make sure that the changes you make to the templates are appropriate for all 16 type articles! (INFJ, ESTP, etc.) ThreeOfCups (talk) 23:04, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Templates 

message: The MBTI, Keirsey Temperament Sorter, and related Jung Typology assessments use the original spelling, Extraversion, rather than the modern corruption, Extroversion. In this context, Extraversion is jargon and should be thus spelled. ThreeOfCups (talk) 15:01, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling of Extraversion 

message: For a discussion about the logo and border color, see Talk:Myers-Briggs Type Indicator#Remove or keep the fancy logos from the articles?. Please don't make a significant change to the logo or border color without discussing it there first. ThreeOfCups (talk) 19:37, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo and border color 

message: The other recreational pseudo-psychology systems Socionics and Enneagram of Personality have only a single article. In the meantime it would be beneficial to remove the "list of notable persons of this personality type" seeing as the Myers–Briggs_Type_Indicator is make-believe. 104.228.101.152 (talk) 02:08, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reduce to one article 

message: You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Myers–Briggs Type Indicator#Redirects and a new hatnote.  Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:13, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion at [[Talk:Myers–Briggs Type Indicator#Redirects and a new hatnote]]
Talk:ISFP

message: I just deleted the descriptions on all of these personality types.  A lot of them were copyvios from different sources, several of them being from http://www.geocities.com/lifexplore/ , where they may or may not have been copied from other locations.  Nonetheless, the three theories of MBTI, Keirsey Temperaments, and Socionics are quite different and require different descriptions of types, functions, relations, and other concepts.  Socionics especially differs from the other two.  The three theories should all be expanded upon in Wikipedia, but it is impossible to do this while there is a conglomeration of these three theories and they are treated as one and the same. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 00:59, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: yeah but i'm lazy. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 03:25, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Type Descriptions 

message: There's a discrepancy in the part about MBTI functions, in which sometimes a term is capitalized and sometimes not. I am unfamiliar with the system myself, however. --OGoncho (talk) 21:16, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Capitalization Discrepancy

message: I created templates for text that's the same across all 16 type articles to eliminate the hours of work it takes to update the same text 16 times. This is a recommended use for templates according to Wikipedia policy WM:TEMP. 
To edit the templates: 
1. Click the Edit link on the section of the article you want to change. 
2. Select and copy the title of the template page (the text between the double braces). 
3. Paste the copied text into the Wikipedia search box and press Go (not Search). 
This will take you to the template. Make sure that the changes you make to the templates are appropriate for all 16 type articles! (INFJ, ESTP, etc.) ThreeOfCups (talk) 22:56, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Templates 

message: The MBTI, Keirsey Temperament Sorter, and related Jung Typology assessments use the original spelling, Extraversion, rather than the modern corruption, Extroversion. In this context, Extraversion is jargon and should be thus spelled. ThreeOfCups (talk) 15:02, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling of Extraversion 

message: For a discussion about the logo and border color, see Talk:Myers-Briggs Type Indicator#Remove or keep the fancy logos from the articles?. Please don't make a significant change to the logo or border color without discussing it there first. ThreeOfCups (talk) 19:36, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo and border color 

message: The other recreational pseudo-psychology systems Socionics and Enneagram of Personality have only a single article. In the meantime it would be beneficial to remove the references of "notable persons of this personality type" seeing as the Myers–Briggs_Type_Indicator is make-believe. 104.228.101.152 (talk) 02:10, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reduce to one article 

message: You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Myers–Briggs Type Indicator#Redirects and a new hatnote.  Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:15, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion at [[Talk:Myers–Briggs Type Indicator#Redirects and a new hatnote]]
Talk:ISTP (personality type)

message: I just deleted the descriptions on all of these personality types.  A lot of them were copyvios from different sources, several of them being from http://www.geocities.com/lifexplore/ , where they may or may not have been copied from other locations.  Nonetheless, the three theories of MBTI, Keirsey Temperaments, and Socionics are quite different and require different descriptions of types, functions, relations, and other concepts.  Socionics especially differs from the other two.  The three theories should all be expanded upon in Wikipedia, but it is impossible to do this while there is a conglomeration of these three theories and they are treated as one and the same. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 01:00, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Type Descriptions 

message: I created templates for text that's the same across all 16 type articles to eliminate the hours of work it takes to update the same text 16 times. This is a recommended use for templates according to Wikipedia policy WM:TEMP. 
To edit the templates: 
1. Click the Edit link on the section of the article you want to change. 
2. Select and copy the title of the template page (the text between the double braces). 
3. Paste the copied text into the Wikipedia search box and press Go (not Search). 
This will take you to the template. Make sure that the changes you make to the templates are appropriate for all 16 type articles! (INFJ, ESTP, etc.) ThreeOfCups (talk) 23:05, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Templates 

message: The MBTI, Keirsey Temperament Sorter, and related Jung Typology assessments use the original spelling, Extraversion, rather than the modern corruption, Extroversion. In this context, Extraversion is jargon and should be thus spelled. ThreeOfCups (talk) 14:59, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling of Extraversion 

message: For a discussion about the logo and border color, see Talk:Myers-Briggs Type Indicator#Remove or keep the fancy logos from the articles?. Please don't make a significant change to the logo or border color without discussing it there first. ThreeOfCups (talk) 19:41, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo and border color 

message: "It also gives them a keen insight into situations similar to that of the ISTJ." Should not this be ESTP/ESFP, or in other words Se dominance? Otherwise it does not make sense. --Hartz (talk) 12:15, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Correction?

message: The other recreational pseudo-psychology systems Socionics and Enneagram of Personality have only a single article. In the meantime it would be beneficial to remove the "list of notable persons of this personality type" seeing as the Myers–Briggs_Type_Indicator is make-believe. 104.228.101.152 (talk) 02:09, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reduce to one article
Talk:Statistic (role-playing games)

message: Some thoughts about additional information that could be included in this article:
*Stats are increasingly often derived from items or "gear" acquired through extensive playing of the game. I think there should be some mention of this, and/or perhaps some link to a "gear"/"equipment" article, just not sure which one.... Any ideas? Benjaminmin (talk) 14:50, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ideas 

message: Some information present in the specific articles was deleted during the merge:
# Attributes (): The list of common attribute names has not been copied. (Any ideas where to put this except Wikibook Role-Playing?) The examples of attributes in common systems should be merged into the respective pages concerning the specific games systems.
# Advantages and disadvantages (): “a character’s Advantage can disappear due to events that unfold ‘in-game’.” – deleted. A general paragraph about the persistence or “changeability” of various stat types seems in order to retain this information.
# Powers (): The short list of examples has not been copied either.
# Skills (): Real-world example Wikipedia:Babel/Levels (language skill representations) could be incorporated into the article somewhere.
# Traits (): OK, GURPS’ wildcard skills are not really traits in the sense described here.
# Derived statistics (): Some copyediting but no substantial changes, although the list of examples is gone.
—TowerDragon 18:10, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Post-Merge 

message: I arrived on this page through "ability points". I feel that the phrase "ability points" deserves a page of its own and that it has a meaning beyond that of RPG stat. 
As I understand it, ability points refer to a feature in games, especially CRPG, which have a dual progression system - experience points (which btw have their own article) and a system of rules that allow players to receive new abilities. 
known examples include the Final Fantasy series, which features the job system (FFV,FF tactics, FF tactics advance),the magicite system (FFVI), the materia system (FFVII), the guardian force system (FFVIII), the equipment system (FFIX), the sphere grid system (FFX), the garment grid/dress sphere system (FFX-2) and the license board system (FFXII), all based on ability points, in all of these cases a separte notion from experience points.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.124.192.14 (talk) 10:52, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  ability points 
Talk:T. J. Tomasso

message: T.J. Tomasso is listed on the Revs 2006 roster as well as on the New Hampshire Phantoms 2006 roster.  Odd?  Incorrect? I'm know he's on the Revs, but he doesn't play... so could he actually be on another team at the same time?  Nah, right?  Any insights, guesses? --Loudsox 01:18, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:2-Aminoisobutyric acid

message: In this lemma the boilingpoint of the substance is mentioned te be about 200°C, while the German Wikipedia mentions a meltingpoint of over 300°C. I Cannot find an independ source for the value(s). Who is? T.vanschaik (talk) 09:51, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meltingpoint / Boimingpoint
Talk:New England

message: Some IP went into the demographic section and combined the numbers for "English" and "American" into one ancestry group without any proper citation. There is no source that combines these numbers into one coherent category. While it may be true that a number of people who select "American" ancestry have predominately English backgrounds (and this is more so the case in the Deep South), there are also Americans with mixed or vague backgrounds who select this ancestry, and a number of African-Americans also self-identify as "American" on the census (see here). So you cannot add these numbers together -you're grouping people who don't have the same ancestries or even the same race. Jonathan f1 (talk) 04:06, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original Research 

message: I would propose expanding one of the lede paragraphs, the one starting with physical geography, to include the USGS physiographic classifications of New England as a province within the larger Appalachian Highlands physiographic division. The digitized version of the physiographic map of the USGS makes it much easier to map the regions of the country. New England is one of seven provinces of the Appalachian Highlands, which together with Canada's Appalachian Uplands makes up the multi-country Appalachian Mountains. 
In the geography section of the article, the USGS physiographical map of New England can be included, which includes five "sections."  the New England Uplands, New England Seaboard Lowland, Green Mountain, White Mountain, and Taconic. Deanrah (talk) 13:40, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Physical Geography