lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Nikephoros III Botaneiates

message: This is a minor error, but one that should be resolved if the article is to become a GA or higher. The article uses a mix of  and , which render the sources differently (commas instead of full stops, for one thing). One or the other should be chosen for all sources. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:19, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. -- Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 20:26, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistent citation format 

message: There is considerable confusion over the chronology of Nikephoros Botaneiates' rise to the Byzantine throne on this page, across the various language versions of the page, and across other Wikipedia pages which address the same subject.
The amount of different dates I have now seen for each stage borders on comical. For example, sources/pages variously give the start of his revolt as June 1077, July 1077, October 1077, November 1077, January 1078, and (as this page currently has it) July 1078. I won't bother running through the various contradictory dates for Botaneiates' entry into Nicaea or the contemporary revolt of Bryennios the Elder.
As best I can understand things, and this is mostly going off of Eric McGeer's footnotes in his recently-published translation of the Skylitzes Continuatus, these contradictions have emerged from differences between the Histories of John Skylitzes, Michael Attaleiates, and Nikephoros Bryennios the Younger. He admits furthermore that "The chronology of Botaneiates' acclamation is not fully coherent".
However, he states with something of an air of authority that Botaneiates began his revolt in October 1077 and Bryennios the Elder in November 1077, and that the date of his entry into Constantinople was indeed March 24, 1078 (as this page currently has it).
It seems worthwhile for an experienced editor to comprehensively go through all of these pages and at least make sure they are offering consistent information. The claims on this page about revolts beginning in July/October 1078 which cite an online 'Encyclopedia of Roman Emperors' are certainly incorrect given the unanimous agreement elsewhere that Michael VII was overthrown by March 1078.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.168.5.157 (talk) 17:37, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chronography of the Revolt
Talk:Odo II, Count of Blois

message: There seems to be an inconsistency in familial relationships.  The second paragraph lists two wives, Matilda and Gunnora, but at the end of the article, four children are listed by his second wife Ermengarde.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.200.63.204 (talk) 20:22, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ida of Formbach-Ratelnberg

message: The family tree of Ida is of another person. You may remove it or create the right one. Thank you, Aris de Methymna (talk) 12:54, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Hey! I'm not very familiar with the subject of this article, but if you're able to information about why you know it's wrong, and possibly even a replacement tree, that would help us greatly to get it fixed quickly. :) TheDragonFire (talk) 13:32, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: That family tree was added by  several years ago so I'm pinging her for her input.  It does appear, however, that the family tree actually shows the ancestry of Leszek the White, a great-great grandson of Ida.  I would suggest removing it since there's very little in the article about Ida's ancestry but Mychele Trempetich may have a better idea.  She is still apparently active in these matters.  Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 14:53, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Family Tree 

message: I'm unclear as to the basis upon which Ida's purported parentage in this article rests. Formbach and Cham were not at all the same lineages, Ratpoto IV of Cham is not known to have had any children by this name, and the only source I'm aware of that discusses her paternity, Europäische Stammtafeln, identifies her as the daughter of Thiemo (Dietmar) II of Formbach. Additionally, Charles Crawley has identified a serious problem with the co-identity of Henry Jasomirgott's mother Ida and the daughter of Thiemo II of Formbach, namely the latter's death in 1040, making her at least ~20 years older than Leopold II, which, as Crawley notes, renders this identification highly improbable.--Masque (talk) 20:25, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like the source of the assignment is Wegener. However, it's pure speculation. I think there needs to be some discussion of this in the article.--Masque (talk) 22:28, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ancestry and Parentage
Talk:Ilghazi

message: ==Untitled==
Any thoughts about moving the page to Ilgazi? Gazi is the Turkish spelling. Cretanforever 05:37, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think Ilgazi should redirect here. DenizTC 10:31, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It does now. Adam Bishop 20:56, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Any thoughts about moving the page to Ilgazi? Gazi is the Turkish spelling. Cretanforever 05:37, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think Ilgazi should redirect here. DenizTC 10:31, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It does now. Adam Bishop 20:56, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Oldřich, Duke of Bohemia

message: Plese, before move of page, use this talk page. English sources use Oldrich, see , Historical dictionary of the Czech State p. 295, or Britannica--Yopie (talk) 12:52, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: 15 books call him Ulrich, while 5 call him Oldrich. If you need a more detailed analysis of the sources, I'll gladly provide one but, as it stands now, it seems fairly clear that his name is usually anglicised - much like Frederick of Bohemia is not called Bedrich. Surtsicna (talk)
*Note, that 7 books of 15 with "Ulrich" are more than 100 y. old and thus are unusable.--Yopie (talk) 15:14, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

text: That still leaves us with 8 books with "Ulrich" as opposed to 5 with "Oldrich" and precedents such as the above mentioned Duke Frederick. Surtsicna (talk) 14:18, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It was a typo. You did not have to wait two months to respond. I will request a move. Surtsicna (talk) 18:06, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The infobox says that his mother was Emma of Melnik, whereas the article text states that Adiva was his mother. No source seems to be provided for either claim. Unless a source can be found, I think both claims should simply be deleted. Nikolaj1905 (talk) 12:37, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who was his mother?
Talk:Iorwerth Drwyndwn

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. SandyGeorgia (Talk)  02:29, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:Ioveta

message: I always hate these single-named articles about medieval people...everybody's got to be "of" somewhere, I think. Probably not going to win that argument though. Nevertheless, Runciman does call her "Joveta of Bethany" on one occasion (probably where I got the name from, although I changed it to Ioveta). Runciman's index lists her as "Joveta (Yvette) of Jerusalem". Latin and Greek Monasticism in the Crusader States by Bernard Hamilton and Andrew Jotischky has "Yveta, Abbess of Bethany". Her name is also spelled various other ways (Yvetta, Juditta). The recent article by Erin Jordan calls her "Iveta of Jerusalem." Adam Bishop (talk) 17:45, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:Isaac Komnenos (son of John II)

message: As this person's date of death is not definitely known surely we can come up with a better title for the article. PatGallacher (talk) 00:34, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I shortened this sentence:
:
It now reads:
:
I removed the extraneous details about the event being anomalous (that seems clear from the background for this nomination being unclear, and the later part about primogeniture not being decisive implies this) and about historians providing extensive speeches and explanations (without more detail, this doesn't tell the reader that much; the "forced to" bit makes it sound like Byzantine historians are a bit inept). Since I don't have the original book, I wanted to let you know in case I misrepresented the the book.
I will note I can see an argument for mentioning the event was an anomaly, if some measure of comparison can be given. Ideally it could state something like "This event was one of N exceptions to primogeniture in Byzantinian succession, with X and Y being other examples". eπi (talk | contribs) 15:20, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contemporary Byzantine historians...
Talk:Small print

message: Mouseprint is on the exact same topic as this article, and should be merged into here.  It is a more extensive article than this one, but uses a much more obscure word for this topic.  --Xyzzyplugh 14:02, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There is also an article on fine print which probably could be merge into or from... AndrewRH 18:01, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Matilda of Anjou

message: This is given as both 1154 and 1158. Do we know which is correct? Valetude (talk) 17:21, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of death 

message: Marriage to a Norman does not make you Norman. It DOES make you whatever consort of whatever title that spouse might have, but it does NOT make you Norman. Nor does it make you English... Ealdgyth - Talk 14:07, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: She was not Norman...

message: Her date of birth is given as 1106, yet her parents marriage was 1110. There is no mention of this ambiguity on either this page or her father's page. 2A00:23C8:3B02:4E01:A1B0:C58:A797:D32F (talk) 15:05, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: None of the information appears to be referenced. So, it could all be guess work. --Kansas Bear (talk) 15:44, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

text: In response to your query, I will change her year of birth to 1111, since we know her parents married in 1110(found a source but have not added it). I have yet to find any reference to her date of birth, however she is mentioned in 1113 concerning an arranged marriage/betrothal(Hollister, page 231). --Kansas Bear (talk) 19:24, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of birth
Talk:Otto, Count of Savoy

message: I see several dates of birth: 1010, 1020, 1023. The versions of this article in different languages are inconsistent. The version in Italian uses 1010/1020. The version in English uses ~1023. The version in Spanish uses 1010/1020 but also ~1023, which makes no sense. The version in French uses ~1023. The version in Portuguese uses 1010.
ICE77 (talk) 06:38, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Several dates of birth
Talk:Petar Snačić

message: The other day I saw Neven Budak on TV say Franjo Rački had said he misspelled his name, and that there's a record of a Snačić noble family in Trogir. This should probably be mentioned :) --Joy [shallot] (talk) 19:34, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it is said on the documentary that Racki misread his name in one section of Cartular of Supetar, where all the bans were named. Er-vet-en (say) 16:05, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Svačić -> Snačić
Talk:Joseph Kimhi

message: this article is copied and pasted from the Jewish Encyclopedia (https://jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/10993-mordecai-b-isaac-kimhi#anchor22); the paradigm 'stem' that he is said to have borrowed from ibn Ezra is the root שמ״ר (the script is not selectable on the Encyclopedia web page, hence the omission) 70.117.56.250 (talk) 01:34, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Good catch. Done, except that I omitted the gershayim that you included here but that doesn't appear in the source you linked to. Largoplazo (talk) 10:39, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  šmr
Talk:Jutta

message: Hi Jutta, 
I was looking up my late aunt's name (she died young at 32, but accomplished a lot - was psychologist and created brooklyn hotline for women in distress)  and discovered that Jutta is Judith. I HAD to fix the entry and add Yitty, and theres only one Jutta I know of... so.
Happy winter, Moshe. Pashute (talk) 11:31, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hi Jutta, hope you forgive me 

message: In describibg the anchorress's cell, it speaks of a small window where food was to be passed in and "refused" to be taken out.  I'm pretty sure the noun "refuse" was intended rather than 'refused" the verb.
Laura in Memphis--70.156.34.118 (talk) 14:49, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammatical error (small one, granted, but it changes the context altogether)
Talk:Qatran Tabrizi

message: Qatran Tabrizi is Azerbaijani not Persian. Because, when he lived Tabriz was Territory of Azerbaijan--Rovshan.95 (talk) 19:35, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: He was an Ancient Azeri language from Tabriz . Before Turkification of Azerbaijan , local population talked in a language that was a branch of Iranic languages .If by territory of Azerbaijan   you mean the Az.republic , that republic is very new among the nations of the world and through out the history , the Azeri ethnics have been a part of Iranian nation .--Alborz Fallah (talk) 05:50, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

text: Turks were not even close to majority in Iranian Azerbaijan in 11th century, as attested by medieval Arabic Islamic historians of the time such as Hamdallah Mustawfi and Al-Moqaddasi, the inhabitants were native Persian speakers. Turks didn't even get control of Azarbaijan region until 1050 AD, so how could this man be azerbaijani? Just because your people colonized the lands you currently occupy does not mean those lands were always turkic, your people are recent immigrants and nothing more. --Qahramani44 (talk) 08 December 2018  —Preceding undated comment added 02:37, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Leopold V, Duke of Austria

message: There is no such name as Luitpold in German. Leopold is the correct name which is also used in the german wikipedia. Please change that. Thank you.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.121.16.51 (talk) 22:19, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, there is... don't you know the Luitpoldpark in Munich?--MacX85 (talk) 19:06, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Luitpold vs. Leopold
Talk:Musée Rodin

message: The garden figures significantly in All the Devils Are Here by Louise Penny, 2020. Kdammers (talk) 20:39, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legacy
Talk:Reginar IV, Count of Mons

message: Should title be Regnier IV, Count of Mons?; currently spelled as Reginar, which is a possible variant; no justification in text; no LC hits; 11,000 hits in Google for name Reginar so definitely a possible form.--FeanorStar7 09:22, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Title of article
Talk:Lý Thái Tổ

message: Was this the king who renamed Vietnam "Đại Việt"? If so, shouldn't the article say this? Badagnani (talk) 04:28, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Đại Việt 

message: In Song dynasty's "Dream Pools Essay" (Meng Xi Bi Tan), it said that Ly came from Fujian. I did not read the book, but there are some studies show that he probably came from Southern China.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.171.158.154 (talk) 01:38, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  about Ly's ancestor 
Talk:Richard II, Duke of Normandy

message: Does anyone else think that the "peasant insurrection" mentioned here is actually referring to the peasants' revolt of 1381 under another Richard II, King of England, of the house of Plantagenet? When I searched online for peasant insurrections and Duke Richard II of Normandy, all I get is excerpts copied from Wikipedia. Jescapism (talk) 05:30, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Cnut didn't "force" Emma to marry him! There were protacted contract negotiations while Emma was safe in Normandy particularly in stating that any future son from the union (the later Harthacnut) would inherit ahead of Cnut's sons Sweyn and Harold. Someone with time can cite the Encomium Emmæ Reginae.TheMathemagician (talk) 12:06, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Life
Talk:Reserve head

message: Nice article, and great photos.  It seems a bit odd having the table of contents coming near the end of the article, after the main body of text: is there some way of having an introductory para, and then a heading that encompasses most of the text, such as 'Description and history' or such like? That will bring the table of contents up to near the start of the article, where a reader would expect to find it! 86.140.131.87 17:14, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Excellent idea -- the way to do that is to add section headings. Have just done that, and the Table of Contents now appears near the top. Glad you like the article! Captmondo 17:36, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Table of contents
Talk:Hampshire and Isle of Wight Wildlife Trust

message: Hello,
I'm seeking advice on whether it's useful to add more information about the history of the Trust, or more information on individual nature reserves (e.g. as per Herts and Middlesex Wildlife Trust's page)
Thanks
Lianne at HIWWT (talk) 09:47, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  History of organisation and/or detailed information on reserves
Talk:Marbodius of Rennes

message: The article calls him Marbodius, Marbodus and Marbod. Can someone clean this up?93.36.190.241 (talk) 19:27, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: Marbod's name strikes me as possibly Celtic (see section on Maroboduus page), hence suggestive of Breton ancestry - although the spelling would be irregular. Rennes of course changed between Breton and French hands but Anjou not so much. Is anyone familiar with any discussion on this? Lowernios (talk) 12:52, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:Roger de Beaumont

message: Roger de Beaumont is the direct ancestor of Alexander Hamilton and some Miller families through de Meulant.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.121.206.54 (talk) 17:39, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know who these people may be, yet I imagine there have been many Millers ( including cognate names ), and many Hamiltons around the world.  But good for the aged gentleman, decrepit at the age of 50 in 1066, for having so many descendants. Claverhouse (talk) 00:20, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Descendancy
Talk:Rotbold II, Count of Provence

message: Sorry - but just to note that this page is a mix-up between Rotbold III and Rotbold II - please mend the hyperlinks.  Note it says Rotbold II was the son of Rotbold II. Apologies if I'm not editing this page correctly.  Good work otherwise, everyone!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.154.183.122 (talk) 17:13, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Salih ibn Mirdas

message: This is to let people know that this article has been scheduled as today's featured article for December 27, 2019, and specifically paging the FAC nominator(s), . It would be good if someone checked that the article needs no amendments. The main page blurb text can be viewed and edited at  Wikipedia:Today's featured article/December 27, 2019.—Wehwalt (talk) 18:17, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops, meant .--Wehwalt (talk) 18:18, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi  and other interested editors. This is to let you know that as a part of preparing this article for TFA I will be lightly running an eye over it for MoS-compliance and grammar, and possibly tweaking a little of the language to ensure that it is at it's very best for its appearance on the main page. If you have any queries about any of the edits don't hesitate to let me know. Thanks. Gog the Mild (talk) 13:35, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Have at it,  —Al Ameer (talk) 19:31, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Well that was pretty much a waste of time. An interesting article, impeccably written. Nice one. Gog the Mild (talk) 22:41, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Main page appearance 

message: Abu ali Salih ibn Mirdas was died in 1029. LIPUROUT (talk) 03:54, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  abu ali Salih ibn Mirdas
Talk:Matthew, Count of Boulogne

message: According to this article and that of Philip, Matthew was 13 years elder than Philip, but in the article of their father Thierry, Philip ranks the first, and in history, it was actually Philip who succeeded Thierry, not Matthew. As they were both legitimate, if Matthew was elder, he should be the eldest son of Thierry and become the successor. What is more, Thierry married their mother Sibylla in 1139, and the first wife of Thierry (Suanhilde) died in 1132, how could Matthew be born in 1130 by Sibylla? Versions of other languages refer that Matthew was born in 1137, but for the sakes above, it is also doubtful.——Heinrich ⅩⅦ von Bayern (talk) 03:19, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: The year of birth must be wrong!
Talk:Muhammad I Tapar

message: Can someone provide sources for use of the name "Mehmed I."  Every source I've ever seen uses "Muhammad" or something more like "Muhammad" than like "Mehmed" for the subject of this article.  I know "Mehmed" is the modern Turkish form of "Muhammad," and that the subject of this article was a Turk, but it doesn't follow from that that he's normally known in English as "Mehmed."  In fact, it doesn't apparently follow that he's known as that in Turkish, since the Turkish wikipedia article is at "Muhammet," not "Mehmed."  So I'd like for some citations of what actual reliable sources use. john k (talk) 00:44, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: In Turkish, Tapar means "he worships" or "worshipper". What is the source for the claim that it means "he who obtains, finds"?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.176.100.81 (talk) 21:04, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Almost a decade old comment, I know. But for people who are wondering the same, here's a source for it  --HistoryofIran (talk) 17:02, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last name
Talk:Sancho VI William of Gascony

message: The article says that in "Spanish: Sancho Guillén).
I can´t understand how it is known in Spanish a person that it is unknown for the spanish, originary from a country that it´s beyond its frontiers, and that it is unrelevant in Spain´s history.
Moreover when in that time, there was no Spanish language at all.
It says also that "His reign is most notable for the renewal of Gascons ties with Spain".
As far as I know, at that time he only could keep relations with his neighbours at the other side of the Pyrenes, and only with the cristian ones.
It says that "Sancho was a son of William II Sánchez and Urraca of Navarre and relative of Sancho III of Navarre and he spent a portion of his life at the court of that king in Pamplona."
It´s impossible for him to be son of Urraca "of Navarre", because Navarre existed since 1150, and at that time, his mother was a little bit death.
It says that "It is possible he even submitted Gascony to the suzerainty of Navarre".
And the posibility should not be reflect in the article. Just because that it is not a fact.
May be he invented the powder, but if there are not evidences...
The fact is that Navarre did not exist at that time, like "Urraca of Navarre".
It says that "He certainly never paid homage to the king of France."
And that is a truth for all the Persons that lived in that epoch. The reign of France was not born at this time. And the Franks divided in three reigns Charlomagne´s empire.
So neither Franks, nor French. 66.81.169.203 (talk) 10:58, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  ¿Sancho Guillén in Spanish? ¿Urraca of Navarre?