Talk:Super Bowl XLIII

message: Nothing here on Comcast's porn interruption?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.218.220.25 (talk) 01:33, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There should be. At the moment, a Google search for "superbowl" gives this. Someone should add it in.   Aaron  ►  07:10, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

text: Oh, wait. It already is. Disregard.   Aaron  ►  07:19, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

text: Noone cares  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.19.188.183 (talk) 03:20, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Porn Interruption?

message: Does anybody know what the two songs that were playing when the teams ran out onto the field?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.87.126.196 (talk) 10:04, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Team Introduction Songs 

message: Seriously, cut that shit out. Some of us come here for information. 68.52.243.143 (talk) 02:26, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Graffiti 

message: I need someone to find out what the First Song was.
: Playhacker (talk) 01:22, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bruce Springsteen songs 

message: Someone can add this Spanish broadcasters?:
Spain --> Canal+ (TV) and Cadena Ser (radio). More info here: http://www.elpais.com/articulo/radio/television/Canal/SER/Superbowl/acontecimiento/deportivo/ano/EE/UU/elpepirtv/20070204elpepirtv_4/Tes/.
Thanks.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.224.26.146 (talk) 01:17, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  International broadcasters (Spain) 

message: Taiwan --> Videoland Television Network TV. The info in the page is wrong. Super Bowl broadcaster in Taiwan is the sports channel of Videoland Television Network. Please correct this. Thanks!   
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Chi3x10 (talk • contribs) 06:37, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  International broadcasters (Taiwan) 

message: I wanted to add a trivia section, but the article is locked for some reason. 
The piece of info I have is that this is the first Super Bowl since XVIII to feature two previous Super Bowl winning Quarterbacks (Warner with Super Bowl XXXIV and Rothliesberger with Super Bowl XL). I did my research for this on wikipedia, and I do not know how to site that. Thanks.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.136.181.234 (talk) 21:09, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia is not a reliable source and therefore cannot be cited. However, I've also heard that on television and I would be willing to bet it is in an article somewhere out there; if someone is willing to find that article then it could be cited. blackngold29 23:22, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia 

message: I cut out a bunch of headers for the second time. They aren't needed for a single line of text. It's a waste of space and it extends the table of contents far more than needed. Grsz11 18:42, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Headers 

message: Super Bowl XL (February 5th, 2006)was highly controversial due to what many fans and sports journalists considered very poor officiating.
I feel this is an important subtopic of the Pittsburgh Steelers Super Bowl history. I would like to see someone write a non-partisan paragraph to be included in the Steelers section of this Wiki. I've been registered on Wikipedia since March, 2007, but haven't edited, so I'm locked out. Thank you in advance for any help in this.
Suggested links are referenced on this Wikipedia page:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reaction_to_officiating_in_Super_Bowl_XL
Thanks, again!
Richeee (talk) 00:56, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It has nothing to do with this article. Grsz11 00:57, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

text: I agree, that game and anything involved with it (including that POV article) is completely irrelevant to this game and article. The vast majority of this article is uncited and could be improved before we start dragging other stuff into it. blackngold29 14:59, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

text: Who would've replied the same either way. Thanks, Grsz11 01:33, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

text: All non-Steelers fans are encouraged to comment as well! blackngold29 01:57, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy surrounding the Steelers last Super Bowl appearance.  

message: Reference 17 - the link goes to the wrong page.  The website is http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/other_sports/american_football/7018632.stm - the current revision has an l at the end (as in stml).  Would change it myself, but article is locked. 86.149.200.10 (talk) 19:45, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Zzyzx11 (Talk) 05:31, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  reference 17 needs fixed 

message: I wanted to reference the opening line posted in the Super Bowl pre-game notes section to this source: http://www.point-spreads.com/football/012609-current-super-bowl-odds.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by Oddspub (talk • contribs) 
:. I added it to that section's third paragraph where it does talk about the spread. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 05:27, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening Liine 

message: announcement here: http://sport.france2.fr/sports-us/51060773-fr.php (live starting at 00:10h CET)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.89.176.73 (talk) 11:09, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: «O73» 20:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can someone please add France 2 to the list of Superbowl 2009 broadcasters in europe 

message: Channel 10 are televising Super Bowl XLIII starting at 10am Monday AEDST.
Go Cardinals!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.23.239.106 (talk) 12:02, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coverage in Australia 

message: I've found a lot of articles that supposedly say this game has been dubbed "The Recession Bowl" because of the economy's effect on commercial advertising and even ticket prices for the game. Here are links. I don't know where to put it all in the article, but I thought I'd help out and give a warning instead of having somebody delete it and say it wasn't relevant. I believe it is relevant to include the effect of the recession on the game.
NFL lockout real possibility in 2011, Super Bowl feels boot of global recession, Goodell: NFL, partners not immune to recession, Super Bowl Parties, Corporate Functions Fall Victim To Economy, Super Bowl XLIII Commercials Have No Best Bets: Advertisers’ Buzz Not a Sure Win in the 2009 Recession Bowl, Finding meaning in Super Bowl darkness
conman33 (. . .talk) 20:48, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I actually went ahead and added a section. Please don't delete it because like I said this is important to the article, if anything just move the info around in the article or merge into a new section. conman33 (. . .talk) 21:12, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Recession Bowl" 

message: Personally, I like to call that Antarctica.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 161.6.149.74 (talk) 18:54, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anartica 

message: TV3,Ireland is broadcasting the Superbowl  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.42.118.152 (talk) 21:58, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broadcasting 

message: Gen. David Petraeus should be listed as being involved with the coin toss, as he was actually responsible for tossing the coin. I can't edit since I just registered.
:(Jj04 (talk) 00:00, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in the Infobox 

message: I have a request for semi-protection in case of vandalism, because Super Bowl XLIII is is a popular sports event (I think) RYAN 3000 (talk) 02:35, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The article is already semi-protected due to vandalism. – wodup – 02:43, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for semi-protection 

message: "Ford, Chrysler and General Motors, the Big Three automobile makers, decided not to purchase television advertisements following the three companies' business struggles in 2008 and early 2009."
I heard from a friend of mine that they were required not to advertise as part of the bailout. Does anyone have any information on this? It wouldn't make sense with all the Cadillac advertising on the NFL website. kevinthenerd (talk) 11:17, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have heard nothing like this, and would strongly discourage anyone from adding any information to this effect unless authoritative reliable sources can be found. GlassCobra 14:40, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Big Three Automaker Commercials 

message: All slots were sold? I counted atleast 7 local commercials. Were those always intended to be local programming or were they unsold slots? Grsz11Review 18:32, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I heard there was a 1-second commercial by a beer company, and there was also supposedly a one-half second commercial from a local broadcaster.  If true this should be added to the Commercials section, with data on how much they cost and what the reaction was like.  Tempshill (talk) 19:59, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know why my station would have local commercials and not elsewhere. Meaning there had to be atleast some spots that were reserved for the local station to broadcast their regular commercials at regular price (as they didn't reach any wider of an audience than usual). As for the 1-second commericial, I'm not sure how much it cost. Grsz11Review 04:56, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commercials 

message: This is a section that in my view should be added to the page. It is definetly a point popping out in more and more sources. I am new to wiki editing, and i don't know how to add it myself, so i wrote it here.
With five seconds remaining in the game, the ball was knocked out of Cardinals' QB Kurt Warner, and, after falling to the ground, caught by a Pittsburgh player. It was ruled a fumble on the field, which resulted in a change of possesion and consequently ended the game. Many football fans and news outletshttp://www.pasadenastarnews.com/opinions/ci_11612268http://www.examiner.com/x-1483-Minnesota-Vikings-Examinerhttp://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/02/02/AR2009020202809.htmlhttp://bleacherreport.com/articles/118524-why-cant-the-pittsburgh-steeles-ever-win-without-controversy/page/2 noted that a booth review should have been conducted, since there had been a chance that Warner's arm was moving forward at the time the ball came out, which would have changed the play call from a fumble to an incomplete pass. If proved true, that would have given the ball back to the Arizona Cardinals for a play from Pittsburgh 29 yard line, with five seconds remaining. While there were other ambiguous calls made by the referees during the game, this was the most debated.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.190.223.139 (talk) 11:27, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Why would they have gotten the ball at the 29 yard line? If reviewed and overturned, it wqould have been an incomplete pass with the ball returned to the previous line of scrimage? I personally thought it should have been reviewed, but that it would not have been reversed--Tom 14:12, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It would have been at the 29 because of a dead ball personal foul against Pittsburgh after the end of the play. I still cannot find a definitive source to answer whether or not an actual booth review was conducted or not. I've seen claims both ways, but it was an awfully short amount of time between the end of that play, and the next play where Pittsburgh took a knee to end the game. And the referees never stopped the game or indicated that the previous play was under review. I think there were a lot of people watching at home who were confused by this as well. Rpine75 (talk) 15:50, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: According to ESPN's PTI a booth review took place, but they deemed the call correct and did not believe it necessary to buzz the referees. If something like 84.190.223.139's comment it added it needs to state the specific outlets, as "many football fans and news outlets" is POV and fan opinions generally aren't notable. blackngold29 16:11, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

text: Strongly oppose any inclusion of facts somehow elevating any kind of "fumble controversy." The sources are quite suspect, and I highly doubt we'll see any coverage in reliable, big-name outlets. The game's over, people; move on. GlassCobra 16:16, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think we should cook up a controversy ex nihilo. The fact that the Cards got away with holding all game; Larry Fitzgerald's bobbled catch that was ruled a TD; the Kurt Warner fumble - all these are really irrelevant. Playing endless counterfactual games ("What if the refs called holding on the Cards? What if the Fitzgerald drop had been called correctly?") is nothing more than a useless mental exercise. 64.111.153.16 (talk) 05:54, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Kurt Warner fumble controversy 

message: The sentence below that reads the fifth one scored (safety) is incorrect. It needs to be changed to the 'sixth' one scored. But this article is semi-protected, so I am unable to make the correction.
Statistics
In Super Bowl XLIII, Arizona and Pittsburgh combined for the fewest rushing attempts (38) and the fewest rushing yards (91) in Super Bowl history.[45] The Cardinals outgained the Steelers in both passing yards (374 to 234) and total yards (407 to 292), but committed 11 penalties for 106 yards. Arizona's safety in the fourth quarter was only the fifth one scored in Super Bowl history,[46] and the first one earned by a penalty against the opposing team in the end zone.[citation needed]  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Superbowlfanatic (talk • contribs) 18:01, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Checking the source attributed to that sentence (a New York Times blog), it seems to corroborate everything except the part about the safety. However, I was unable to find a source that said how many safeties there have been in a Super Bowl. If someone can find a source to back up what the above user is saying, I would support the change. GlassCobra 18:09, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Factual Error in Statistics section of this article regarding the safety scored in Super Bowl XLIII 

message: Hungary's Sport1 is wrongly listed among radios, it's a TV. 
Their presenters Richard Farago (play by play) and Sandor Szabo (color comm) were in Tampa. It was a full length live broadcast starting 23:45 CET
Sport1 is the home of NFL in Hungary for 5 years and they have just signed a contract to broadcast NFL for the next four years in Hungary
Thanks  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.131.218.12 (talk) 22:27, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  International Broadcasters - Hungary 

message: Should there be a reaction or "reception" section?
--Dtothediesel (talk) 19:43, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: "Reaction", because "reception" sounds like it was a hit movie or album and it got lots of praise from critics. It even sounds like some other sort of reception or speaking of Super receptions, something like this. But that's just the football fan in me speaking. conman33 (. . .talk) 05:16, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reaction 

message: The NFL announced on Feb. 5, 2009, that after reviewing the game, Darnell Dockett had 3 sacks, tying Reggie White for most sacks in a Superbowl.  Can someone edit this in the main article.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Raiderbarry (talk • contribs) 00:32, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Darnell Dockett Credited with 3 Sacks 

message: If there is going to be a game summary in the lead, I don't really care, can it at least be written without all the POV color commentary thrown in for effect? I trimmed some of it, but it really could use a complete rewrite. Thanks, --Tom 19:54, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, I didn't notice it had significantly changed since I originally added that short summary in the lead section at 06:47, 9 February 2009 UTC. Cheers. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 23:53, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem! Thanks, looks much better. Cheers, --Tom 13:35, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Lead section

message: can someone please fix the last paragraph of the "game summary" section, which currently incorrectly states:
"Pittsburgh got the ball back on their own 22-yard line with 2:37 left in the game and two timeouts remaining. On their first play, a holding penalty pushed them back 10 yards. Roethlisberger then completed two passes to Holmes for 27 yards. After an 11-yard reception by Nate Washington and a 4-yard run by Roethlisberger, he completed a 40-yard pass to Holmes at the Cardinals 6-yard line. Two plays later, Holmes caught a pass in the corner of the end zone and managed to land his toes down right before falling out of bounds for a touchdown. After a booth review, the touchdown pass was reversed with 35 seconds remaining. Following an interception, Warner completed a 20-yard pass to Fitzgerald and a 13-yarder to J. J. Arrington, moving the ball to the Steelers 44. With 18 seconds left, Warner prepared to attempt a Hail Mary pass with five seconds left. Warner threw a TD pass to Fitzgerald sealing the Cardinals' first Super Bowl title."
obviously incorrect.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.91.118.68 (talk) 16:39, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  game summary ERROR (to say the least) 

message: I put in a link under game summary for a couple of websites (on of them was SI.com) proclaiming XLIII to be the best Super bowl ever.  If that view holds up (I suspect we will see the usual rash of such lists as Super bowl XLIV approaches) we can perhaps consider putting better references (meaning: not snap decisions by reporters the day after the game) and moving it up to the lead section. --Legis (talk - contribs) 20:24, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Best ever?

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Super Bowl XLIII. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090121180038/http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com:80/2009/football/nfl/01/18/superbowl.odds.ap/index.html?eref=si_topstories to http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/football/nfl/01/18/superbowl.odds.ap/index.html?eref=si_topstories
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090202134317/http://www.sacunion.com:80/pages/sacramento/articles/11464/ to http://www.sacunion.com/pages/sacramento/articles/11464/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:10, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Super Bowl XLIII. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090205210646/http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com:80/2009/football/nfl/super-bowl/02/03/ratings.ap/index.html to http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/football/nfl/super-bowl/02/03/ratings.ap/index.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090131011019/http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com:80/2009/football/nfl/super-bowl/01/26/nfl.ap/index.html? to http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/football/nfl/super-bowl/01/26/nfl.ap/index.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090202183733/http://www.newsday.com:80/sports/football/ny-spglaub316018744jan31,0,1578688.column to http://www.newsday.com/sports/football/ny-spglaub316018744jan31,0,1578688.column
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090206221021/http://www.sfgate.com:80/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2009/01/04/entertainment/e142556S95.DTL to http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2009/01/04/entertainment/e142556S95.DTL
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090202063720/http://sport.france2.fr:80/sports-us/51060773-fr.php to http://sport.france2.fr/sports-us/51060773-fr.php
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090202213558/http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com:80/2009/football/nfl/super-bowl/01/28/refs.ap/ to http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/football/nfl/super-bowl/01/28/refs.ap/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:24, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Super Bowl XLIII. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110610223247/http://www.cnbc.com/id/28898650/site/14081545/for/cnbc/ to http://www.cnbc.com/id/28898650/site/14081545/for/cnbc/
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110610223247/http://www.cnbc.com/id/28898650/site/14081545/for/cnbc/ to http://www.cnbc.com/id/28898650/site/14081545/for/cnbc/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:45, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Super Bowl XLIII. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080208151923/http://www.tampabaysuperbowl.com:80/news_tampa_logo.htm to http://www.tampabaysuperbowl.com/news_tampa_logo.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090204065410/http://news.steelers.com:80/article/102648/ to http://news.steelers.com/article/102648/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090203031702/http://news.steelers.com:80/article/102703/ to http://news.steelers.com/article/102703/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090204062947/http://news.steelers.com:80/article/102742/ to http://news.steelers.com/article/102742/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090206024647/http://www.nfl.com/superbowl/story?id=09000d5d80e334ba&template=with-video-with-comments&confirm=true to http://www.nfl.com/superbowl/story?id=09000d5d80e334ba&template=with-video-with-comments&confirm=true
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090129090704/http://tampabaysuperbowl.com:80/media_faqs.htm to http://www.tampabaysuperbowl.com/media_faqs.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090206233627/http://myespn.go.com:80/blogs/nfcnorth/0-3-180/Practice-squad-extravaganza--Packers-and-Lions.html to http://myespn.go.com/blogs/nfcnorth/0-3-180/Practice-squad-extravaganza--Packers-and-Lions.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090202010423/http://msn.foxsports.com:80/nfl/story/9158128/Finding-meaning-in-Super-Bowl-darkness to http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/9158128/Finding-meaning-in-Super-Bowl-darkness
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090207112001/http://7tv.ru:80/schedule.xl to http://7tv.ru/schedule.xl
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090206232244/http://news.prnewswire.com:80/ViewContent.aspx?ACCT=109&STORY=/www/story/01-21-2009/0004957985&EDATE= to http://news.prnewswire.com/ViewContent.aspx?ACCT=109&STORY=/www/story/01-21-2009/0004957985&EDATE=
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:53, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 15 external links on Super Bowl XLIII. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.tampabaysuperbowl.com/news_tampa_logo.htm
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://news.steelers.com/article/102648/
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://news.steelers.com/article/102703/
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://news.steelers.com/article/102742/
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.tampabaysuperbowl.com/media_faqs.htm
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/football/nfl/super-bowl/01/26/nfl.ap/index.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090130113218/http://www.point-spreads.com/football/012609-current-super-bowl-odds.html to http://www.point-spreads.com/football/012609-current-super-bowl-odds.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://myespn.go.com/blogs/nfcnorth/0-3-180/Practice-squad-extravaganza--Packers-and-Lions.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/9158128/Finding-meaning-in-Super-Bowl-darkness
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090203134645/http://www.azstarnet.com/sn/hourlyupdate/278448.php to http://www.azstarnet.com/sn/hourlyupdate/278448.php
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=%2Fn%2Fa%2F2009%2F01%2F04%2Fentertainment%2Fe142556S95.DTL
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://7tv.ru/schedule.xl
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://news.prnewswire.com/ViewContent.aspx?ACCT=109&STORY=%2Fwww%2Fstory%2F01-21-2009%2F0004957985&EDATE=
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090207052037/http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/World-News/Porn-Clip-Interrupts-Super-Bowl-Broadcast-In-Tucson-Arizona-Fans-Exposed-To-X-Rated-Movie-Scene/Article/200902115215795?lpos=World_News_First_World_News_Feature_Teaser_Region_0&lid=ARTICLE_15215795_Porn_Clip_Interrupts_Super_Bowl_Broadcast_In_Tucson%2C_Arizona%3A_Fans_Exposed_To_X-Rated_Movie_Scene to http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/World-News/Porn-Clip-Interrupts-Super-Bowl-Broadcast-In-Tucson-Arizona-Fans-Exposed-To-X-Rated-Movie-Scene/Article/200902115215795?lpos=World_News_First_World_News_Feature_Teaser_Region_0&lid=ARTICLE_15215795_Porn_Clip_Interrupts_Super_Bowl_Broadcast_In_Tucson%2C_Arizona%3A_Fans_Exposed_To_X-Rated_Movie_Scene
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090203134645/http://www.azstarnet.com/sn/hourlyupdate/278448.php to http://www.azstarnet.com/sn/hourlyupdate/278448.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:42, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on Super Bowl XLIII. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090203112812/http://www.nfl.com/superbowl/story?id=09000d5d80e63488&template=with-video-with-comments&confirm=true to http://www.nfl.com/superbowl/story?id=09000d5d80e63488&template=with-video-with-comments&confirm=true
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120226055159/http://news.steelers.com/article/102330/ to http://news.steelers.com/article/102330/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090202173227/http://www.raiway.rai.it/index.php?lang=IT&cat=73&showNE=107 to http://www.raiway.rai.it/index.php?lang=IT&cat=73&showNE=107
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090205003629/http://affiliates.westwoodone.com/content/technical-clocks/sports/Super%20Bowl%20Format.pdf to http://affiliates.westwoodone.com/content/technical-clocks/sports/Super%20Bowl%20Format.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090327052959/http://blog.transforumer.net/2009/02/02/pitt-riots-for-steelers-sixth-super-bowl-victory.aspx to http://blog.transforumer.net/2009/02/02/pitt-riots-for-steelers-sixth-super-bowl-victory.aspx
*Added archive https://archive.is/20090207113028/http://www.pittnews.com/news/pitt_crashes_the_party-1.1353326 to http://www.pittnews.com/news/pitt_crashes_the_party-1.1353326
*Added  tag to http://www.pittnews.com/opinion/letters_to_the_editor_response_to_the_riots-1.1355106
*Added  tag to http://www.pittnews.com/news/1.1370808-1.1370808
*Added  tag to http://www.pittnews.com/news/rioting_not_just_a_pitt_thing-1.1372667
*Added archive https://archive.is/20120715005715/http://news.steelers.com/article/105667/ to http://news.steelers.com/article/105667/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:03, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion:
* Ray Jay1.JPG
* Ray Jay3.JPG
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:07, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion