lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of Filipino male actors

message: This page should be moved to List of Filipino actors or List of Philippine actors, in keeping with our conventions for naming lists.  Which of these titles is more appropriate? --Idont Havaname 16:43, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: List of Filipino actors is more appropriate. --Howard the Duck | talk, 16:52, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Page move

message: Whichever Wikipedians have taken it on themselves to create this list, congrats. I know it was a lot of hard work, but there were too many names with red-links (a no=no) and names without articles. I removed them. The List of Filipino actors (which means Filipino male actors, as actresses have a different list) needs work. The alphabetization needs to be reviewed and there are female names on the list. 
But more importantly, I would say that all Filipino actors (male and female) should be on the same list, but only if they are sufficiently notable to have, and already have, their own articles created.
PLEASE: No more red-links, no more names which lead to disambiguation pages or to different individuals with the same name (i.e. Princess, Babalu, Carlos Diaz, Alicia Lane, Helen Morgan, Carlos Diaz, Alicia Lane, Babalu, Carlos Morales, Dan Fernandez, Diana Dean, Eddie Gutierrez, Eddie Rodriguez,
Geraldine, Gregorio Fernandez).
Also, keep vigilant for vandalism (there were several made up names with "perv" or "perve" (i.e. pervert) included - pure vandalism. 
Please contact me if you have any questions. I am not an admin, but I have several years of experience (on and off) on Wikipedia and I, like you, just want to make it as professional and worthy as possible.
Maraming salamat!! Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk) 15:16, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with Rms125a.  The Philippines is a country of talented actors and actresses and thousands have come and gone, but what good is this list if there are no further informations regarding those artists? We could fill this list with thousands of Filipino talents, but how could a contributor vouch that the name he/she is adding is a legitimate name? And as readers, how could we distinguished if a name is a real actor or just a made-up name by some vandals? Please help Wikipedia by writing a page about your actor before adding his name on the list. I am familiar with WP:REDLINKS but to preserve the integrity of Wikipedia, I am deleting the names with no articles yet or linked to a different person other than that actor. - Briarfallen (talk) 16:51, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: IMPORTANT NOTICE

message: Hi! Just Wondering. Why are there female (actresses) here in this article if they have their own article. This includes Camille Prats, Bea Alonzo, and others. This is all about Filipino Male Actors, NoT FEMALES. 
EncaGMA7 22:23, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved all actresses to the List of Filipina actresses last January 19, 2011. - Briarfallen (talk) 16:51, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Philippine Actors?
Talk:Chris Sabo

message: Does anyone know where the name "Chris" came from? 68.143.166.174 16:49, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: We need one. I remember the wraparound glasses, but I want to see them again. -Phoenixrod 17:40, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: * Where is Chris now and what is he doing?  70.179.175.141 (talk) 05:18, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Recently

message: Why nothing on his use of a corked bat and getting caught and ejected from the game? Rustygecko (talk) 07:56, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corked Bat
Talk:History of New York City (1898–1945)

message: A quick Google search fails to find anyone but Wikipedia claiming that Robert Moses was at some time director of PoNYA.  It isn't mentioned in our biography of him.  For the thirty years when Moses was at his peak, the similarly aggressive Austin Tobin was PA director, and the two occasionally had policy differences.  Does anyone offer evidence for the contrary? Jim.henderson (talk) 14:53, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Robert Moses directing Port Authority 

message: There is a reference to the creation of the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey in 1921, but the agency that was created was called the Port of New York Authority. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Port_Authority_of_New_York_and_New_Jersey. Similarly, there are references to the Port of New York and New Jersey, but the context seems to be during the period the port was called the Port of New York. I think acknowledgement of the current name would be fine, but the historical name should be in there too. I can trace some of the edits to mid-Feb 2015. Danchall (talk) 02:41, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Port of New York (original name) 

message: Template:NYC year nav has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. -- M2545 (talk) 13:29, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomination for deletion of Template:NYC year nav
Talk:Dubya

message: This may be a better place to redirect this to. --66.41.102.194 17:59, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[List of United States Presidential names]] 

message: We are doing a disfavor to the readership with a plain redirect to George W. Bush. I came to this article (Dubya) specifically because I wished to understand where the nick name comes from, what it means, and so on. I was only able to get some info by going to history and seeing the versions prior to the redirect (the ones by Barbara Shack).
Note that the George W. Bush article does not even MENTION the word Dubya (the word is simply not there). So people who wish to understand what 'Dubya' is are at a loss. This is NOT a dictionary issue. We're not talking about some simple definition of a word. In fact, I suspect most dictionaries would NOT have an entry for Dubya. It is very fair game in an encyclopedia IMHO. GustavoDuarte
:That information is in the George W. Bush article. The issue is that "Dubya" doesn't warrant a whole separate article. —Centrx→talk • 15:19, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plain redirect is wrong 

message: As this redirect is currently listed at WP:RFD, can an admin add  to the top of the page? Thanks. Hut 8.5 17:38, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. —David Eppstein 18:10, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

text: The list shouldn't have been changed. I've reverted the edits that caused the issue. Cheers. --MZMcBride 01:54, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request 

message: Can an admin fix this page to redirect to List of United States Presidential names#43_.E2.80.94_George_W._.28Walker.29_Bush? The current redirect does not point to the correct section.  Thanks, CrazyChemGuy (talk) 16:52, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. Hut 8.5 17:03, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editprotect; redirect broken 

message: Can an admin please (re-)fix this page to redirect to List of United States Presidential names#George_Walker_Bush? The current redirect does not point to the correct section.  Thanks, CraigBox (talk) 18:02, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed again. BTW, you have to remove the tl| from the code above in order to display the template - the tl is there so you can see what the template was without having to display it. Hut 8.5 21:50, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editprotect; redirect broken (again) 

message: Currently sorting redirects by placing redirect templates. Wish to add the following two templates:  and . Thanks. -- OlEnglish (Talk) 03:02, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Hut 8.5 10:43, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  request editprotected to add templates 

message: The contents of this redirect should be changed to:

#REDIRECT [[List of nicknames of United States presidents#George W. Bush]]{{R from alternative name}}{{R to section}}

because the target article has been moved to the indicated title. (And does this redirect really still need to be protected?) - dcljr (talk) 06:12, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: , and protection lowered. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 07:14, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request from Dcljr, 5 September 2010
Talk:Rules Enabling Act

message: I think 28 USC 2072 is more properly quoted as the Rules Enabling Act.  28 USC 2071 seems to speak to practice rules, as opposed to procedural rules.    —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.203.194.117 (talk) 02:43, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect

message: Can anyone find the citation for this Act?
That is: public law#?  U.S. Statutes at Large?  Something??
--Mark Adler (Markles) 17:17, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Citation
Talk:Craniosacral therapy

message: There's something worthwhile in this practice. The article is too negative. Similar to the article on paracetamol. 2A00:23C8:9FF6:DC01:7018:A24B:DE2D:E3F8 (talk) 04:10, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Good sources say it's a load of rubbish; so Wikipedia follows. Job done. Bon courage (talk) 07:32, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Altogether too dismissive an article 

message: This is a very opinionated portrayal of CST. The points about its veracity or effectiveness need to be stated factually as “it is alleged that this practice is focused on non existent criteria or that the existence of such and such are questionable according to some sources 2603:7000:8F0:8BF0:DA4:4F71:95BC:911F (talk) 05:31, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: See WP:YESPOV. Bon courage (talk) 05:45, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 3 December 2023 

message: someone needs to review this. It literally calls CST "quackery". 76.168.165.192 (talk) 12:59, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:BIGMISTAKE. Bon courage (talk) 13:06, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

text: Yes CST could be considered a more subjective experience for some but there has been extensive research throughout the world to support rhythmic changes in the body. This review is not only biased but equally misleading when the therapy supports thousands of people around the world. This reflection is one sided, ignorant and dismissive to a 3 dimensional therapeutic support system. RN Bc. Talking 113.163.156.102 (talk) 03:44, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Show us the published science supporting it, using WP:MEDRS as the rule. DMacks (talk) 03:51, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wildly biased article 

message: get rid of the word "non-existant" and other claims or there being no palpable rhythm, there has been many studies recording and measuring the movement of the cranial bones and the body's cranialsacral rhythym: https://www.iahe.com/docs/articles/Article__-_CranioSacral_Therapy_Research.pdf 2600:100E:B069:94F0:947:4ED2:5C08:ED34 (talk) 19:33, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Upledger is not a reliable source. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 20:02, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 21 May 2024
Talk:Sri Lankan independence movement

message: I wish to protest about the way British people are being portrayed in theese Sri Lankan articles. Please I want the British portrayed in a neutral way, not the one sided anti-British, Anti-Impieralist nonsense that already is here. Don`t give me any of your leftie politically correct nonsense. There is quite enough Anti-British drivle on this website and I call on all Britons here to stamp it out.
I am British - my ancestors fought in the British Army from 1856, in two world wars - and I should like to point out that there is nothing in these articles against the British people, but specifically against the British Imperial System. The associated article about Dowbiggin points out that it was the  the system itself and not Dowbiggin that created problems. I do not think that a 'neutral' stance can be taken about slavery. The men who took part in the Cocos Islands Mutiny had volunteered to fight fascism and found themselves at the butt end of the very racism they had joined up to fight. Surely, a system in which the Commander-in-chief calls his principal civil defence officer a 'black bastard' and is not even repremanded, is not commended by anonymous writer above? Vinodm 14:20, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Portrayal of the British

message: If  Lahiru k wishes to include his notion of “High caste in this article he should explain what is his so called “High caste” and also what then are “low castes”.
Wikramadithya 00:02, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:   [[User: Lahiru k|Lahiru k]] and his “High caste”
Talk:Albatross (1920 schooner)

message: The title refers to Albatros with one s, but in the article continiously speaks of Albatross with double ss. Dinsdagskind 17:33, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm currently taking care of that, please read the history of Albatross (ship, built in 1920). --Ibn Battuta 17:42, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Effective action

message: The image supplied before was misleading, as the diagram(s) shown do not arise in the expansions for any of the functionals discussed in this article. I have replaced it, trying to preserve the original intention and hopefully doing a better job at illustrating the relevant diagrams. Y!qtr9f 15:53, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is it possible to change the parenthetical comments in the following sentence to footnotes for the sake of clarity?
"Just as Z is interpreted as the generating functional (aka characteristic function(al)/moment-generating function(al) of the probability distribution function(al) e-S[φ]/Z) of the time ordered VEVs/Schwinger function (aka moments) (see path integral formulation), E (aka the second characteristic function(al)/cumulant-generating function(al)) is the generator of "connected" time ordered VEVs/connected Schwinger functions (i.e. the cumulants) where connected here is interpreted in the sense of the cluster decomposition theorem which means that these functions approach zero at large spacelike separations, or in approximations using feynman diagrams, connected components of the graph." 
84.142.53.39 (talk) 00:38, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Footnotes vs Parenthesis 

message: Clearly this article needs all of its sections fleshed out, however I feel that the "One loop approximation" section is severely lacking. Some explanation of what the equation means is really required, as well as explanation of the notation used. A reader without formal knowledge of the calculation may find S(2) unclear and may need it to be explained.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by PhysicsSean (talk • contribs) 10:58, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  One loop approximation 

message: Since this article has been around for years largely unaltered, I went on and rewrote it entirely. I used the previous version for key structural ideas and trying to keep the information around, albeit in a new form. I did however get rid of some things: I did got rid of the unreadable list of alternative names for the generation functional, as well as dropping de Witt notation since it is entirely redundant to have all equations around twice. 
I did however add new information too: elaborated on the three types of generation functionals to draw attention to their similarities and differences, showed how these can be used to find the full propagator, fixed up the one-loop approximation (finding a reference for it too), created some figures, added in-text references, and introduced some additional information relating to the symmetries of the effective action and the convexity of the effective potential. (Lonewolf709 (talk) 23:31, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Complete rewrite
Talk:Patrick Wilken

message: Patrick Wilken is a notable psychologist who has work published in peer-review journals and contributed substantially to the study of consciousness. His contributions are very well covered by the article. --EncephalonSeven 17:39, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a case for speedy deletion 

message: — JIP | Talk 10:21, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  AfD result 
Talk:Pink pound

message: The result was KEEP. --  ALLSTAR  ECHO 15:41, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They are in 2 different countries. Leave them seperate. --  ALLSTAR  ECHO 07:40, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. Although they are culturally distinct I believe they were born of the same genesis of showing the economic realities of the LGBT communities' impact in a well-written article could easily share that information. However, how pink pound and pink dollar each developed, were used within the LGBT community for empowerment and those who did business with the LGBT communities including marketers, advertisers, major corporations and all levels of government vary greatly  between the two countries rendering the histories, implications, uses in all forms and fields as well as the numerous sources as being two distinct paths sharing only the briefest of ledes. In short, there is overlap but it would do a disservice to both to merge. Perhaps once each is independently developed   comparing and contrasting makes sense but a merge is quite premature and would make for a poorer quality encyclopedia. Benjiboi 16:46, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge [[Pink pound]] and [[Pink dollar]]
Talk:GPS for the visually impaired

message: Please do not delete this article speedily.
This article was cut from the GPS article because it should be a separate article.  This article is not a duplicate of the information in the GPS article, because that information has been removed from that article and moved here.  This was requested by a user on the discussion page of the GPS article, and I also think this article deserves to be separated from the main GPS article.  Michaelfavor 17:53, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy deletion

message: say if any of these whizbang systems turned out to be practical, or were they too complicated for real use. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.201.31.246 (talk) 23:00, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  say how they went 

message: Can we get any images of what these devices look like 
Tydoni (talk) 20:14, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Images
Talk:Medical students' disease

message: *comment I always just assumed this phenomenon was an adjunct of the widely accepted 'premed's aren't very bright' theorem, perhaps a merge is in order--63.22.94.162 17:54, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: comment

message: I had included this:
:A jocular account (Celis, 2003) is given by a student writing in the StudentBMJ:
::Over the past 10 months, my girlfriend has had rectal cancer, diabetes, amebiasis, mesenteric ischemia, and even severe acute respiratory syndrome. No, she does not have familial polyps, she is not obese, she is not a senior citizen, and she has never been to Beijing. She is just a medical student. It all started a year ago when she began her clinical courses. After taking microbiology, she had an acute case of shigellosis. A day after passing endocrinology, she fell ill with a pheochromocytoma. And three months ago, having finished gastroenterology, her rectum had a malignant neoplasm, a parasitic infection, and haemorrhoids.
*de Celis, Enrique Soto Pérez de Celis (2003), "Studying with the Enemy," studentBMJ 2003;11:307-348 
It's not that there's anything wrong with it, but it doesn't add that much. It doesn't add anything factual, and it's not as funny as Jerome K. Jerome's account. So I'm taking it out. Dpbsmith (talk) 00:18, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Think maybe this doesn't add much to the article

message: Have had time now to have checked DSM-IV-TR regarding category for this article. (please don't come back at me with just dictionary def's or other psychobabel ) The authoring psychiatrist have -it seems- craftily made sure that it doesn't fall exactly into any of the existing codes, thus ensuring that they have not suffered from a psychiatric illness themselves ;-) Some of those checked through are: psychosomatic, somatoform (inc. conversion disorder, hypochondria etc), delutional disorder -somatic type.
Also, there are good neurological models to explain that  its a normal process of being made more aware of internal psychical perceptions that affects some personality types. Therefor it is a diagnosis for a certain temporary psychology phenomena.
Suggest that it's logical therefore, to be given the category & sub categories: Perception | Psychology | Illusion | Somatic | Diagnosis This will hopefully connect  the article into everything else, rather than let it hang out in the cold on its own.--Aspro 21:38, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Catagory

message: Would this article be better as a subsection of the nosophobia article? Ezeva (talk) 13:01, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Nosophobia
Talk:Munish Chander Puri

message: Can we get the full name of this person? Circeus 18:12, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: it's not impossible he might have been notable outside it within the academic community. I didn't doa check on that. Circeus 21:28, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Google Scholar has given me about 3 papers as citations, none of which date after 1995.  Furthermore, there's another MC Puri who is a biological chemist, so if this article stays, it needs to be disambiguated. So, basically, this falls under the category of obituary and really should be speedied. MSJapan 15:44, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

text: His biography is much more fleshed out now. I think it was a good idea to keep this article. I'm leery of the apocryphal story near the bottom though. Do we have a reference that he indeed spoke these words or performed this action? -- KarlHallowell 01:16, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was don't move unless proof is given that the proposed name is correct. —Nightstallion (?) 12:08, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: AfD Results Notice

message: *Reference Check here. Also checked with American Mathematical Society Database. This may not be accessible to all as subscription is required. Thats why its results are not there in Google search. Eclairs 14:56, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move: Mukesh Chandra Puri -> Munish Chander Puri 

message: I would like to request the above mentioned change. Kindly Help  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amoghhassija97 (talk • contribs) 18:19, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change of page title, Mukesh Chandra Puri -> Munish Chander Puri
Talk:Active vibration control

message: Some cameras now have anti-vibration features (Image stabilization).  Isn't this essentially the same technology?  Should there be a link?  NCdave (talk) 12:29, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cameras 

message: http://physics-animations.com/Physics/English/spri_txt.htm  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.121.204.129 (talk) 16:38, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible reference