lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Sensual Phrase

message: Removed character descriptions per WP:CP, as they were a direct copy from an envy.nu fan site (blacklisted so I cannot add the link). Do not place them back! Ninja neko 07:19, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed the 'special volume' section as well, that was also a direct copy from this site. Ninja neko 07:24, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed character descriptions 

message: That the anime series really is a different story with something of the same premise really does need to be addressed by the article. The statement that was removed was, yes, unsourced, but it shouldn't be that hard to find a WP:RS comparison, given just how different the two forms are. —Quasirandom (talk) 02:04, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed it from the plot because I thought the same statement was in the anime section already. Looking now, I realize my brain was mixing the chapter list with the main article, so I've put it back. Agree the differences need coverage. :P -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 02:05, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anime adaptation
Talk:Jean Passepartout

message: Whare did he work earliar 2409:4060:398:4AE1:0:0:6C7:18AC (talk) 15:52, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whare did he work earliar 

message: Is passepartout black or white? 47.214.7.141 (talk) 18:07, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Passepartout is White and French BobsmartyIIII (talk) 16:29, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Color of passepartout
Talk:Yvette Carte-Blanche

message: Isn't the statement that Mimi and Yvette also became good friends a little dubious? They spend several episodes fighting with each other, eg over the Spirit of Nouvion competition.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.12.30.143 (talk) 13:03, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Magnus the Pious (Warhammer)

message: The in-universe template is here to reflect the ways in which this article's current form appears to be at odds with Wikipedia's guidelines on writing about fiction.
Please don't remove that template without addressing the underlying concern; if you disagree that this article needs cleanup based on the guidelines, please discuss it here. --- User:scbomber (no worries -- only bombs in netrek 04:51, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: In-universe
Talk:Dictionnaire de l'Académie française

message: What relation does this dictionary have to the Dictionnaire de la langue française, better known as Littré? Colin McLarty (talk) 11:51, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Obviously, this is a very old question, but if anyone is still wondering, the Dictionnaire de la langue française is a publication by Hachette, originally compiled by Émile Littré back in the mid-19th century. While he did use the Academy's dictionary as one of his sources, he was not limited to it, including many new words (technical terms, colloquialisms, etc.) not found in it. The [French Wikipedia article] has more information on it. Mahousu (talk) 01:41, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Relation to Littré
Talk:Petit Robert

message: What is the proper title for this work?  I found various editions with different titles
* Le nouveau petit Robert : dictionnaire alphabétique et analogique de la langue française from WorldCat
* Le petit Robert from Google Book
* Petit Robert French Dictionary - Le Petit Robert  from Amazon
DutchTreat (talk) 14:18, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: Could a review of the older, larger dictionary be summarized here so the reason for and the manner of production of the smaller version could be set in its own historical context? (where are the editors of this book, in fact...missed clarification opportunity...!) 
Also, a listing by date of its editions and the editors with primary oversight for them would be of interest. In working from one version, an interesting article in my own line of work seems to have cropped up sometime between the 1969 and 2008 versions, and it would be good to know if that were part of any deliberate efforts to amplify entries in certain areas, or just a random windfall.108.20.41.15 (talk) 09:49, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editions and Background 

message: Grand Robert and Le Robert (dictionary) are missing articles to complement Petit Robert -- 64.229.88.43 (talk) 07:44, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Dictionaries
Talk:The Canadian Encyclopedia

message: I removed that claim from the opening line; the CE is anything but authoritative; it's full of errors, omissions, and reads like a comic-book history in spots, oversimplified and dumbed-down and grossly p.c.-ified.  I've seen better and more accurate copy in everything from Western Report and MacLean's Magazine to The Onion.  When I wrote to them to confront them about some REALLY sloppy errors on a certain group of articles, I got a letter back saying pretty much "well, OUR researcher has a Ph.D - what do you have?"  That Ph.D wasn't worth the UBC toilet paper it was printed on, IMO.  They've since changed the content in question - but still haven't got it right.  And it still reads in worse point-form than an elementary school textbook......  "Authoritative" is something like the Brittannica; the CE just ain't.  "We know better" was teh attitude I got, when they didn't know anything at all; that's "pretentious" not "authoritative" Skookum1 (talk) 21:23, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: The CE is NOT "authoritative"

message: Not sure why this was moved from the proper name to one without "The"....but The is part of thr official name.Moxy (talk) 07:13, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong title
Talk:Quid (encyclopedia)

message: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/europe/frances-favourite-encyclopaedia-falls-victim-to-wikipedia-784420.html  —Preceding unsigned comment added by LA2 (talk • contribs) 10:14, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Information has been added to the article.  -- John Broughton   (♫♫) 13:41, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: .../... but there are still too many links inside our wiki referring to this obsolete quid.fr site that imho a robot is the only solution to remove all of them. ONaNcle (talk) 08:50, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  2008 edition discontinued
Talk:Hoboken catalogue

message: Why on Earth is this page entitled 'Hoboken-Verzeichnis'? What does that even mean? Would a better title not be List of works by Joseph Haydn? J Milburn 16:17, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It was meant to be analogous to Mozart's Köchel-Verzeichnis.  There was a call on the Talk:Joseph Haydn to convert the german version of this page to English so I did it.  I'll bring up the name issue with those guys.  DavidRF 16:44, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, thanks. J Milburn 16:50, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

text: No. Nor is a Volkswagen a Folk Wagon for English speakers. Dig it?
75.180.34.240 15:24, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Köchel-Verzeichnis currently redirects to Köchel catalogue, consequently I moved this page to Hoboken catalogue. --Francis Schonken (talk) 07:07, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you.  Opus33 (talk) 16:44, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name

message: What is the meaning of the letter S after some musical compositions? I only know Opus,Kochel,Deutsch,and BWV.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.250.212.129 (talk) 00:48, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Query?
Talk:Charles Augustin Sainte-Beuve

message: "Marcel Proust took issue with this contention and began an essay meant to refute it. Proust's essay eventually developed into À la recherche du temps perdu." 
Well, not quite. Around 1909 Proust completed (although it seems to not have been published until many years later by Gallimard) a long set of essays titled "Contre Sainte Beuve" whose opening words are "Every day I set less store on intellect". English translation by Sylvia Townsend Warner (Chatto and Windus, 1958). Many of the themes of À la recherche were mooted in these essays. See George Painter's biography. Xxanthippe 23:11, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Contre Sainte Beuve

message: Reads like it has been copied from somewhere, possibly from a non-English source.  Badly written.  What can "the Premier lundis of his collected Works" possibly mean?  He was an "acute sufferer" - er, from what exactly?  Maybe a history of the Port-Royal abbey counts as literary research - but why?  The reader gets no sense of what he did or why he was an "important" figure.KD Tries Again (talk) 21:56, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs attention
Talk:Julien Louis Geoffroy

message: He took orders and for some time was a mere usher, eventually becoming professor of rhetoric at the Collège des Quatre-Nations.
Why 'mere' ?  Seems a gratuitous put-down to all the impoverished teachers who no doubt did their best.
... he published, with Fréron's brother-in-law, the abbé Thomas Royou (1741–1792), a journal, L'Ami du roi (1790–1792), which possibly did more harm than good to the king's cause by its ill-advised partisanship 
Enormously typical and stereotyped suggestion of wretched old ginks who resent any writing or practice on a cause they personally oppose, who should prefer such advocates would just shut up. Claverhouse (talk) 08:42, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Mere'
Talk:Objections to evolution

message: Young Earth creationist Kent Hovind blames communism, socialism, World War I, World War II, racism, the Holocaust, Stalin's war crimes, the Vietnam War, and Pol Pot's Killing Fields on evolution, as well as the increase in crime, unwed mothers, and other social ills."
Blames them on what or for what?
Young Earth creationist Kent Hovind blames communism, socialism, World War I, World War II, racism, the Holocaust, Stalin's war crimes, the Vietnam War, and Pol Pot's Killing Fields on evolution, as well as the increase in crime, unwed mothers, and other social ill" 86.191.214.39 (talk) 07:16, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: ….Hovind blames [long list] on evolution, as well as [short list]. Not entirely easy to parse, but conveys the information you asked about. Sjö (talk) 08:18, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it is easier to read now. --Hob Gadling (talk) 08:28, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Hovind

message: "This, then, is the general statement of the second law of thermodynamics: 
	the total entropy of any system plus that of its environment increases as a result of any natural process." 
						 Physics, Principle with Applications, SIXTH EDITION, p. 425, D.C Giancoli, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey,1998 
This excerpt from a physics text book is at variance with: "The claims have been criticized for ignoring that the second law only applies to isolated systems." LEBOLTZMANN2 (talk) 19:14, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello , I'm not sure I understand what the problem is. Both statements agree. If your issue is that the words "isolated system" are not included in the first quote, It's most likely because it is presented as a general statement in the introduction of the book. And if not, here is an other source for the definition that explicitly mention it . And again, since trying to apply the second law in a non isolated system doesn't make any sense anyway, it's obviously implied even if not mentioned explicitly. --McSly (talk) 21:45, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

text: In the ten years since your first attempt at inserting creationist pseudoscience into the article, neither physics nor biology have changed enough to make evolution suddenly contradict the Second Law. --Hob Gadling (talk) 08:58, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Isolated systems
Talk:Felix Jaeger

message: How old is Felix? In the latest book, Manslayer, there are several hints that Felix is not aging, and he is obviously pushing at least 40. Is there a reason for this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.133.17.21 (talk) 20:05, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age? 

message: In the second paragraph, the article states "The eldest son of the wealthy Jaeger family, Felix [...]". However in the books he has at least one elder sibling. 
From the book Skavenslayer by William King: 
* The question interrupted the flow of Otto's ranting, as Felix had intended it to. His brother stopped, turned around and looked sharply  at his younger brother. (p.185)
* "You always did take those hero tales you read too seriously, little brother." (Otto to Felix, p.240)
72.12.152.229 (talk) 22:52, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Order of birth?
Talk:Les p'tites Michu

message: Once again we have an article on a French work written up entirely from the point of view of an English adaptation. Even the role creators given are English not French! Would we do this to the Mona Lisa? Give the Andy Warhol version rather than Leonardo da Vinci's? -- Kleinzach 00:23, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Furthermore the London cast have now been credited with being the role creators! What is going on here? -- Kleinzach 00:36, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Writing up a derivative work instead of the original! Again!
Talk:André Antoine

message: I've added the complete list of Antoine's theatrical works.  There are several hundred, and I organized them as clearly as I could.  I welcome feedback from others about a more suitable way to organize, but I think it's important to keep the full list, as Antoine is, in part, notable for the sheer volume of work that he produced.  I will edite the body of the article to reflect this soon. ÇaCestCharabia (talk) 05:02, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added complete list of theatrical works
Talk:Dean Village

message: Dean Cemetery should be incoporated into this article. David Lauder 16:32, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

message: Is this the Dean village mentioned in Robert Stevenson's Catriona, a few hours walk to the north ofvthe old town?--Dipa1965 (talk) 22:03, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Catriona 
Talk:Marta Brunet

message: The person has been named in the linked page as a person of importance in the area.  Leaving it as a stub may allow others to expand the article to relect itsimportance.--JAXHERE | Talk 16:38, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've tried to expand it some even though I'd never heard of this woman before. I'm glad it wasn't deleted as coverage of women and Latin Americans are both a bit spotty. She's certainly a notable Chilean woman writer so far as I can tell.--T. Anthony (talk) 05:56, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Calcium silicate

message: Calcium silicate is CaSO3.  Calcium orthosilicate is Ca2SO4.  The data given is a hodgepodge of both.  Edits needed.  24.199.200.234 (talk) 15:16, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry it is! Charge balanced and well characterised.--Axiosaurus (talk) 10:02, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Here we have another chemistry article covering multiple materials (see calcium sulfate).  The inclusion of a data box encourages editors with limited knowledge to add mis-matched data from various sources that do not necessarily apply to the box-title formula.  Data boxes should only be added to articles in which the subject compound is uniquely defined. . . .LinguisticDemographer 12:48, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Multi-substance article

message: Why is the diagram a redlink, and is it even possible to make a diagram for this compound? Badagnani (talk) 08:25, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diagram 

message: I noticed that the "Passive fire protection" section is very similar to a section on this page: http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/Calcium-silicate http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/Calcium-silicate but I don't see attribution on either site.  The Wikipedia section seems to be an abridged version of the Nationmaster section, so I'm guessing Nationmaster had it first.  Neither article cites a reference for this information. Agrjlc (talk) 20:28, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The Nationmaster site credits Wikipedia at the bottom - and it appears to be a copy of the Wikipedia article as of 20:34, 3 November 2006 complete with the ...make a bomb big enough to flatted a hoose.' vandalism. :-) Vsmith (talk) 20:52, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attribution? 
Talk:Marta Colvin

message: The person has been named in the linked page as a person of importance in the area. Leaving it as a stub may allow others to expand the article to relect its importance. --JAXHERE | Talk 16:40, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Txiki Begiristain

message: I've moved this article from Txiki Beguiristáin because, as 91.84.219.129 has correcly pointed out, the name was spelled incorrectly. The spelling "Begiristain" is consistently used by El País, punctilious in these matters, and is also the spelling found in Spanish Wikipedia. It is true that "Beguiristain" is sometimes seen in the Spanish press, but this seems to be a  Castilianization which, though widespread, is erroneous. Googling for the two spellings reveals an enormous majority of spellings without the U, and many of those with the U are English-language sites whose authors might well have been misled by this lamentable (though understandable) error in Wikipedia.AdeMiami (talk) 17:02, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling of the name
Talk:Raimundo Lezama

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Page moved. (closed by non-admin page mover)  Jerm (talk) 01:20, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Raimundo Pérez Lezama →  – WP:COMMONNAME is just "Raimundo Lezama" or just "Lezama", doesn't use paternal surname professionally. Sources on page: 1, 2, 3. Ortizesp (talk) 00:11, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

text: Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. GiantSnowman 11:30, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 12 April 2021
Talk:Norfork Tailwater

message: Hi, I just tried to categorize this page in "Arkansas Rivers" but it still lists the "uncategorized" tags at the bottom. I am a noob. How do I remove that? Pcrh 16:41, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: While I understand the article can be improved, much (not all) of what you deleted was legitimate info about the river. I was actually in the process of editing it down to a more reasonable article and adding the note about the flooding when you just reverted to the current stub. If you are going to take it upon yourself to improve an article (and I agree, it needed improvement), you might at least consider filtering what is there for value before you delete--or consider adding something of value to the article yourself. Respectfully, Pcrh (talk) 23:36, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Your recent reversions removed the citation notes. You also replaced the rather useless image of your hand. What I deleted was quite simply unsourced WP:OR and promotional in tone. If you wish to add material to the article, then do so using reliable sources. The article should be made a redirect to Norfork Dam and any sourced, non-promotional material merged there. Vsmith (talk) 00:26, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I suppose the info about places to stay on the river was promotional? OK, though it was useful info. What about the number of the Corp of Engineers to learn when the river will be high because of electrical generation? Promotional? The useless picture of my hand was a picture of a fly I was holding, an imitation of an insect that lives on the river. Again, I thought this was useful info and relevant to a river whose main economic benefit to the state/area is the sport fishermen it attracts. Re unsourced material, wiki prefers to delete this rather than find the source? Seems again discretionary as to what is "unsourced" information. I don't expect wiki requires a cite after every single sentence (this is not the standard for other articles, at least). This is your game, clearly, but I would respectfully observe that, by the standard you imposed on this article, many other articles on wikipedia (even exemplary articles) should be hacked too--lots of info without a cite. And you also kept uncited statements in the stub you left, which seems inconsistent with your reasoning for the other deletions. How exactly do you, as arbiter of this article, decide which unsourced material stays and which unsourced material goes? If there are no cites, why not delete the entire article? Also not sure why this article should be merged with the dam article. The river and dam are two separate items. If you want to delete the article completely and redirect to the dam, I guess it would solve all your problems! Go wikipedia! Pcrh (talk) 17:44, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent Deletions
Talk:James Joseph Brown

message: Why is this chap significant?
87.254.78.113 16:47, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. --KenWalker | Talk 02:43, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment
Talk:L'Apocalypse des animaux (album)

message: Introducing L'Apocalypse des Animaux by Vangelis. Enjoy, and happy editing.Gardener of Geda 16:50, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: First Wiki entry

message: I always wanted to know the purpose (or meaning) of that strange pre-ending of Creation du Monde. While listening to it you think "now it's fading away because it's the end", and suddenly we are back into the main part. What happened during the recording? (I don't know if it is on every version of Creation du Monde, I still have the L.P.). DannyJ.Caes (talk) 14:28, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Strange pre-ending of ''Creation du Monde''
Template talk:TranslatePassage

message: Hi. This template automatically creates a link to English. Unfortunately, that page is a dab page. Please change this template (I would if I knew how) to create the link as English instead. Thanks. --Tkynerd 16:53, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind. Fixing the template was easier than I thought, and I verified that the change worked on the page (Tokusatsu) that was giving me trouble. --Tkynerd 16:55, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please don't link to dab pages! 

message: Doesn't seem to explain how to add template to article. Peter jackson (talk) 14:37, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  How? 

message: I hope this feedback is helpful:
* The instructions say (in a box with an "i" graphic) "This template should always be substituted (i.e., use ).", but later say "This template should be transcluded, not ed." before immediately saying "Example:  ~~~~"
* Also that last example indicates that the substituted template should be signed, which is not appropriate if this template is to be added at the head of an article.
Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:37, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing instructions
Talk:Javier Casas (footballer, born 1982)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
----
:Javier Casas →  – no clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC Joeykai (talk) 00:42, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. GiantSnowman 15:11, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 10 September 2021