Talk:Panning (camera)

message: I did a few fix-ups.  Added a minor addendum to the computer section and the movie section, removed some bad wikitext and a nonexistent picture ref from the photography section, as well as literally describing the visual effect panning has on photographs.  It's too bad the picture went missing, that section really needs a picture in addition to a description.  I have no examples in my files that would be uploadable. 137.246.200.49 18:50, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fix-ups 

message: This article has a animated gif image, but this kind of animations presents some accessibility issues. The animation should only be activated if the user specifically desires so. —surueña 09:17, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accessibility issues 

message: :Any additional comments:
::I am relatively neutral on the name, although I agree that panning photography is not ideal. However, I think that it's a rather slight topic on the whole for an article, and probably would be better served being merged (along with a handful of other framing articles) to shot. But that's another kettle of fish... Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 07:30, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You could cover the cinema aspects in shot (filmmaking), but we'd still need to cover the still photo technique.  I don't know of a better place for it. Dicklyon (talk) 07:35, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, but that's fine - an encyclopedia is expected to have some redundancy along similar articles. However, panning in a motion picture is much different from panning in a slow-shutter still photo, for instance. Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 07:44, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: User:ESCapade has said on my talk page that "I figure out the four types of panning myself, it is just logical."  Therefore, since the whole article structure is now based on unsourced original research, it needs to be reverted or at least fixed up. Dicklyon (talk) 16:06, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur - if there are reliable sources that can categorize the "types" of pan, then sorting may be in order, but I'm somewhat dubious these will be found. If they are, however, then this definitely needs substantial prose work, because the current section is all but unreadable to me and seems to use non-standard jargon (at least non-standard to this field). Hmm. Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 20:08, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original research categories 

message: I'm continuing to write panning photography as review upon this article. Please do not use this page to review my idea. ESCapade (talk) 03:12, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review 

message: This is one of convergent panning photographs, that's the original raw file for download. Happy review, feel free to comment. Thank you. ESCapade (talk) 09:17, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original .NEF RAW file 

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:DTM Mercedes W204 DiResta09 amk.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on August 3, 2010. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2010-08-03. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! howcheng  {chat} 18:23, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:DTM Mercedes W204 DiResta09 amk.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon