Talk:Massachusetts State House

message: The article is missing a considerable amount of history about the previous capital, the commissioning of the current building, and the subsequent expansion. -- Beland 01:27, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion request

message: ... And we call the capitol building for the place "The State House"... CaribDigita (talk) 14:23, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: It is funny. We say Mass is not a State-- (Yet is a Commonwealth)

message: The edit links are messed up on this page--they're appearing clumped at the bottom instead of next to the section headings.  Anyone know how to fix it?  Thanks! Asbruckman (talk) 02:04, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: formatting needs fixing: edit links

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Massachusetts State House. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/6AU5MXoXO?url=http://tps.cr.nps.gov/nhl/detail.cfm?ResourceId=580 to http://tps.cr.nps.gov/nhl/detail.cfm?ResourceId=580&ResourceType=Building
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:05, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I added... The Masonic Freemasonry cornerstone ceremony took place on July 4, 1795 and was presided over by Paul Revere - Deputy Grand Master of the Massachusetts Grand Lodge. 2601:589:4800:9090:653B:EC70:5899:F2D2 (talk) 13:07, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Masonic cornerstone ceremony took place on July 4, 1795 and was presided over by Paul Revere 

message: The account of the State House additions needs to be de-garbled and expanded. E.g.:
1. "The Commonwealth completed a major expansion of the original building in 1895. The architect for the annex was Bostonian Charles Brigham":
The 2nd sentence is a non sequitur. Were there two different projects—an "expansion" followed by an "annex"?  If not, and only one entity is being named, then reduce the 2nd sentence to: "The architect was Bostonian Charles Brigham."
2. "In 1917, the east and west wings, designed by architects Sturgis, Bryant, Chapman & Andrews, were completed":
a) Are you naming a single entity—an architectural firm called Sturgis, Bryant, Chapman & Andrews? Three entities—individuals Sturgis and Bryant, and firm Chapman & Andrews? Four individuals? If the latter, use the English word and.
b) You will have to explain how Bryant could be involved in a 1917 project when he had died 18 years earlier, in 1899.
c) At the risk of being obvious, identify all persons in a Wikipedia article by their complete names—Gridley J. F. Bryant.
Etc.
Jimlue (talk) 03:25, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: State House additions

message: Some weeks ago I removed a number of "In popular culture" items as unsourced trivia. Another editor has restored them -- now with sources -- but I'm concerned that what we now have is sourced trivia:
*The entirety of the source's  text relating to the Mass State House is  Aside from the fact that there's nothing about court houses or hospitals, how does this help the reader better understand the Massachusetts State House? Some scenes from movie X were shot there. So??? 
*The entirety of the source's text  is  Buildings such as state capitols, city halls, The White House, and the US Capitol are designed to be symbols of power; projecting power is their raison d'être. They're used in movies all the time for exactly that purpose, and pointing out any one particular such use -- though, BTW, there's nothing in the source about "featured prominently" -- is like pointing out, in an article on MacDonald's, that Officer Sullivan needed a quick bite so he stopped for a Big Mac. (If we had a source saying, "Strangely, the Massachusetts State House has never been used in a movie or book as a symbol of power", then that would be worth including in the article.)The sort of thing that would belong in the article is some version of  Unfortunately, that claim is from a promotional website ("On Location Tours: TV & movie-themed tours in NYC & Boston" ) which is nothing like a reliable source for such stuff.
* What's the source  says is  But since this source (a review of a community-theater Zoom production) is absurdly inappropriate, and can't even get the plot straight (Mr. and Mrs. M fly over the State House because they are abandoning the Public Garden), let's see what MWfD itself says :  That's not "featured", and though MWfD is the official children's book of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts , this is a trivial passing mention telling the reader nothing about the State House. (I wouldn't be surprised if some source turns up saying something like, "That even small children in the Boston area know and recognize the State House is seen in the fact that it's mentioned in the children's classic MWfD", and if so that might be worth including in the article. But we don't have such a source as things stand.)
*The text in the source (a game review)  is:
*:
:In other words, a passing mention in a sea of rambling trivia (and one giving no support to the article's talk of interior and exterior and destruction).
*The source (a four-sentence review ) invites the reader to  but doesn't mention the State House at all, though it's shown in a photo, as are the Bunker Hill Monument, Tobin Bridge, Old North Church, and other stuff you'd expect to see, just as you'd expect to see the Golden Gate Bridge in mutant-invaded SF, the Empire State Building and Brooklyn Bridge in mutant-invaded NYC, and so on. As with all the other overblown trivia entries above, the State House isn't "featured", and this is meaningless trivia irrelevant to the reader's understanding of the Massachusetts State House.
EEng 07:22, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Inpopcult trivia