lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Mack

message: I removed the following unreferenced claim: "Popular urban myth holds that the vernacular term "Mack" is a corruption of the word mackerel, originally derived from French, but is used as slang for a pimp due to the mackerel's tendency to guide other fish to their mates." If someone can document this, feel free to add it back into the article in an appropriate section. --Junius49 (talk) 18:55, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mackerel 

message: The article states: "the main character was actually a real life former pimp". Is Max Julien a former pimp, or is the character he played based on a real-life former pimp? Please clarify. Nietzsche 2 (talk) 12:51, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed that claim (per WP:BLP). --Junius49 (talk) 19:00, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pimp 

message: This article is poorly developed, sourced, and consists mostly of a plot summary. It needs to be rewritten with information on the film's production and release added to the article as well as the plot section needing to be trimmed down significantly. There should also be more reviews from notable critics added to the article as well and uncited sources either deleted or given proper citations. There is so much work that is needed in order for this article to meet Wikipiedia's guidelines and standards of a well developed, and properly sourced article.--Paleface Jack (talk) 17:18, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Mack (film). Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  ___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 12:17, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The Mack (film)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Rolando Masferrer

message: It's not referenced, and there's absolutely no consensus that this is true.  I have almost exactly no opinion on Hoffa, but the Wikipedia lead claims he's a trade unionist.  In any case, allegations that he was involved in organized crime do not necessarily support that he was a boss.  Interpreting his conviction as such would be 1. siding with a controversial case on Wikipedia, and 2. an improper synthesis--lots of people probably go to jail for tampering, but are not necessarily mafioso.69.94.192.147 (talk) 22:35, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Changed reference to Jimmy Hoffa as a mafia boss
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Alexander Marquardt

message: I think that this is nothing more than power-tripping by a user with nothing better to do than discuss the content of someones page. Would the page for "Jennifer Lopez" not also be considered a vanity page. But because you happen to feel the opinions of Hollywood adds validity to documenting the accomplishments and life of this woman that she deserves a page over a spublished author in an MBA program?
: You should know that all comments placed here will be ignored.  Any comments relevant to the discussion must be placed in the project page.  You might also want to spend some time reviewing Wikipedia:Votes for deletion before you jump in.  Rossami (talk) 19:25, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Infanta, Quezon

message: Either the name is from Infant Jesus or from some Spanish Infanta.
I doubt that somebody would remember an Infanta of Philip II in the 19th century.
--Error 03:08, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: value of Infanta 49.145.15.129 (talk) 11:30, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Esp
Talk:Roman Catholic Diocese of Mainz

message: This is the English wiki, surely the English name should be the main one used. Magjozs (talk) 14:31, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  migrate to Mentz? 

message: also to be corrected on other wiki pages 82.50.193.53 (talk) 18:40, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  dioecesis moguntinA (female word)
Talk:Neandertal (valley)

message: see also Talk:Neanderthal
I killed the redirect to Talk:Neanderthal, because this is the discussion of Neandertal which is a valley. This is different from Neanderthal which is a species. -- 84.132.67.2 (talk) 15:11, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, there should be a suggestiong-redirection, since the similarity to the names, as well as the relatively unknown name change.Stormfin (talk) 01:05, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --64.149.41.61 (talk) 20:28, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

message: "There are questions about if these remains are of the Neandertals? In these excavations like I mentioned earlier two cranial pieces were found one, a left zygomatic and partial body and second, a right piece of temporal bone. These pieces have been seen as a perfect fit to the Neandertal 1 calotte. Although these pieces are not specifically from the Neandertals. These findings may or may not be relatable to the Neandertals but have similar characteristics to them."
- Poor language and written from a first-person point of view. 83.250.244.66 (talk) 10:56, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Language use
Talk:.so

message: (from WP:RM)
====.so (domain name) → .so====
See .au discussion below. -- Netoholic @ 22:03, 2005 Feb 8 (UTC)
* Support --Tony Sidaway|Talk 21:07, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Page move

message: See .au discussion below. -- Netoholic @ 22:03, 2005 Feb 8 (UTC)
* Support --Tony Sidaway|Talk 21:07, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [[.so (domain name)]] &rarr; [[.so]]

message: I can't see what the paragraph about ml.org has to do with the .so TLD. I suggest that it should be deleted unless the owner can come up with some kind of relationship. Sfgreenwood 09:07, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You're joking, I presume. Look at the whois - the .so TLD is still under the control of the defunct ml.org - aka Monolith Innovations. That's why it's down. So yes, it has a very clear relationship, sadly. --205.150.76.42 22:27, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

text: The DNS listed on ml.org's registration finds no such machine as "mercury.ml.org" - I tried them all... --66.102.80.239 05:24, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: ml.org

message: The page at nic.so still exists, the article needs to be updated to reflect this.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.224.100.113 (talk) 19:00, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: At the moment, every domain name server for *.so is unusable, except for mercury.ml.org which has been unreliable at best. By all means, be italic in editing pages to add any new information, but .so does not look promising at the moment. --66.102.80.212 (talk) 22:39, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  nic.so still exists 
Talk:.au

message: (from WP:RM)
====.au (domain name) → .au====
The domain name is primary usage, and aligns page naming with the 200+ other ccTLDs. .au is currently a redirect to this page. File format usage is very much secondary, and is disambiguated. -- kjd 14:13, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Page move

message: The domain name is primary usage, and aligns page naming with the 200+ other ccTLDs. .au is currently a redirect to this page. File format usage is very much secondary, and is disambiguated. -- kjd 14:13, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [[.au (domain name)]] &rarr; [[.au]]

message: what about .oz in future?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.242.81.170 (talk) 03:23, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: dot OZ is the TLD (Top Level Domain) custom made for Australians, but still available to everyone. dot OZ is targeted to those who may want a  domain with the cultural association with Australia, but without the requirements of .com.au, net.au or org.au registrations.
What would be an appropriate way to include this information in Wikipedia?  It's not part of the .au TLD, but it is a current TLD for Australians designed to take the place of the one that was migrated to .oz.au.   Shamino (talk) 02:11, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: .oz

message: There is no need for those 3 business to be named in the article. It add nothing to the quality of the content and the link seems to be doe to get higher SEO.
(who cares if they were the first to be certified, as all business must now be certified).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.47.158.38 (talk) 06:16, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove 3 names of businesses that were the first to get certification
Talk:Photography in Taiwan

message: Perhaps wedding photography in Taiwan can also be introduced here?? :)  Mababa 04:39, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: are you talking about 婚紗攝影? Is that a unique Taiwanese phenomenon? I know there are plenty of stores like that in Taiwan but I'm not sure if it's something unique Wareware 06:45, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Wedding photography industry

message: Part of this article, Exposing Taiwan's celluloid, should get incoporated.Mababa 07:07, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Taiwan photography history

message: Moved article from "Photography of Taiwan" since we are discussing a regional style of photography and not photographs of an island. --Jiang 01:16, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved article
Talk:James M. Wayne

message: PedanticallySpeaking had written that James Moore Wayne was succeeded by Joseph Philo Bradley, remarking that the seat was abolished in 1867 but recreated in 1869.  The seat was indeed abolished, but there's no reason to associate this seat with the one created in 1869.  John Catron's seat was similarly abolished by the same law that abolished Wayne's seat, and only one seat was created in 1869, so which of these two seats would be the one that's recreated?  The answer is that the seat created in 1869 is a brand spanking new seat and has nothing to do with Wayne's seat. — DLJessup 04:41, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Successor 

message: A temporary subpage at User:Polbot/fjc/James Moore Wayne was automatically created by a perl script, based on this article at the Biographical Directory of Federal Judges. The subpage should either be merged into this article, or moved and disambiguated. Polbot (talk) 00:02, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Bot-created subpage
Talk:Joseph P. Bradley

message: PedanticallySpeaking had written that Joseph Philo Bradley was preceded by James Moore Wayne, remarking that the seat was abolished in 1867 but recreated in 1869.  Wayne's seat was indeed abolished, but there's no reason to associate that seat with Bradley's.  John Catron's seat was similarly abolished by the same law that abolished Wayne's seat, and only one seat was created in 1869, so which of these two seats would be the one that's recreated?  The answer is that the seat created in 1869 is a brand spanking new seat and has nothing to do with Wayne's seat. — DLJessup 04:44, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Predecessor 

message: The American National Biography says that he had no middle name, although the middle initial "P" may have been chosen to honor his father Philo.  I'm going to move to "Joseph P. Bradley" and change this. john k (talk) 03:42, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: A temporary subpage at User:Polbot/fjc/Joseph P. Bradley was automatically created by a perl script, based on this article at the Biographical Directory of Federal Judges. The subpage should either be merged into this article, or moved and disambiguated. Polbot (talk) 16:15, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Bot-created subpage
Talk:Shazbot

message: Is this article really meant for an encyclopedia?  There is no explanation of what it is, though I assume it is a word.  Also, it's kinda hard to explain this word, considering that it was just kinda made up.  If anyone else agrees, inform us here, and perhaps we shall put it up for a vote for deletion.  Cabhan 04:48, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Dunno about you, but I found it useful when I needed it. 67.171.100.105 16:15, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Encyclopedic? 

message: "Shazbot! I just points gamed the Shazbot out of those people! I'm oh so yobbish!"
This sentence doesn't explain its context at all. What's points gaming? And where has anyone ever said, "I'm oh so yobbish!"? (There are no Google hits for that sentence.) Does this relate to video games, or sports, or what? NeonMerlin 03:59, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yobbish?! 

message: Shazbot is also used in gaming e.g. Starsiege Tribes. Shouldn't this be listed as well?--Rootbeerjunky (talk) 06:12, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gaming
Talk:Battle of El Caney

message: Given that El Caney was a peripheral combat in the overall Battle for San Juan Hill, a plain and obvious American victory, I've analysed its outcome in the greater strategic context and labelled it "Indecisive", in the same way that the Australians can win some localized battles at Gallipoli but still lose the battle overall. My rationale is this: there was little doubt that the Spaniards would cede the hill at El Caney. It was a question of time: Lawton planned to overrun tEl Caney quickly and surge south to outflank the Spaniards at San Juan. Vara del Rey prevented this. -- Albrecht 05:02, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: (Note: not sure if you realize that I did not write the article text; nor am I convinced that your comment was added with a view to improving the article in any meaningful way) The "indecisive" label is both fair and accurate. Taking an enemy position isn't grounds for victory if the place had value only in context of a larger simultaneous battle. Fundamentally: Vara del Rey succeeded in his objectives; Lawton failed in his. Where's the victory in that? As for the "properly led" comment, I think the problem here has more to do with weasel words and the lack of a citation than with any particular POV. The statement is essentially true, as many historians have indeed remarked: the war was lost by atrocious strategy at the political and army bureaucracy levels, not because of any human or material quality lacking in the Spanish troops or field commanders. El Caney is a good example of this. Albrecht 02:53, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

message: The Americans are not destined to beat the Spanish Army. They need overwhelingly(10 times to be exact) better resources to overcome a teenage Spanish Soldier
Yet we kicked your Spanish butts right?--Az81964444 (talk) 03:10, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Spaniards are moslty if not all are winnners. 

message: who i should feel sorry for, the Americans who suffered 3 times more dead than Spaniards or Vara Del Rey's bravery.
: It depends, if in the Thermophile battle you felt sorry for the Persian dead.. --213.37.71.217 (talk) 14:55, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The lesser of two evils 

message: Out of almost 10,000 men, 81 dead and 360 wounded is not a phyyric victory. It was a costly victory for the U.S. obviously but not phyyric.--Az81964444 (talk) 03:13, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Phyyric Victory
Talk:RoboSapien

message: "without recourse to wheels on within its feet" - is that even English? If so, what does it mean? Sounds like a typo... Vocaro 09:51, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I am not sure if there is a correlation between the 'Robosapien' toy and the mentioned soccer match. I do not think they're related, and I'd recommend we remove this section. What're some other editors' thoughts? BBFanToys (talk) 18:29, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing 'Other Uses' Section 

message: i know i already added some as you can see, but should i remove it or keep it there? to me, it makes sence but i really dont know if i should keep it up or take it down, a mention of it was here before so i guess it's ok???? vote what you think about my edit, is it good, or bad?
RedGreenAndBlue (talk) 19:09, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should fakes be added to this page?
Talk:The Hindenburg (film)

message: Moved in accordance with naming conventions ("movie" isn't part of the title, so don't capitalize it). Everyking 05:30, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved

message: large section of this article have been lifted word for word from IMDB.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.107.70.60 (talk) 12:25, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: plagarism

message: Joe Spah* (miscredited or erroneously credited in other sources as Joe Spahn)
The correct name is Joseph Späh (Spaeh) with an Umlaut! 217.111.104.103 (talk) 07:58, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: wrong credits

message: Shouldn't the following be edited to reflect that they were the last two survivors alive (and presumably that there is now one survivor alive) rather than removed completely?
:He was one of two remaining survivors of the crash as of May 2012. The other being Werner Doehner, who was 8 at the time of the disaster.Marsch, Stefanie. "Werner Franz überlebte den Zeppelin-Absturz 1937 (Translation: Werner Franz, survived the Zeppelin crash in 1937) (in German)". Saabrücker Zeitung, June 6, 2011. Retrieved: July 14, 2011.
sheridan (talk) 06:32, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: removal of last two survivors
Talk:Coleco Telstar series

message: This should be moved to Coleco Telstar, because the article refers to the series of Telstar units and not the cartridges for the Telstar Arcade --24.114.252.183 06:10, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)

message: If I am not wrong the Coleco Telstar color variants like the Telstar Colormatic, Telstar Colortron and Telstar Gemini are some of the first consoles which show color, and the only first generation consoles which show color. mcjakeqcool Mcjakeqcool (talk) 12:29, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No, Atari's Pong's were color as well. --Marty Goldberg (talk) 14:09, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

text: What?! Atari's Pong was in color, how I thought that game was in black and white! mcjakeqcool Mcjakeqcool (talk) 17:34, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Coleco Telstar varaints=color

message: I had a Coleco Telstar unit that looked identical to the Telstar Alpha except it had a jai alia game substituted for squash. Wouldn't doubt the game was the same, just named differently. Internet research leads me to believe it was a (possibly rare) model 6030.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Xot (talk • contribs) 12:51, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Telstar Alpha variant? 

message: I, too, had the variant on the Alpha, which can be found on the Pong site mentioned at the bottom of the article:
http://www.pong-story.com/coleco_alpha.htm
Here is text from the above link:
"The Telstar Alpha (model 6030) was released in 1977. It is a classic from Coleco, and uses the AY-3-8500 game chip. The system plays 4 games in three difficulty levels. It is the successor of the three older models (Telstar, Telstar Classic and Telstar Ranger), and only differs by its case and fourth game (JAI-ALAI, also known as SQUASH). Like the first Telstar, this system was sold in large quantities as it was cheap. It was also released in Europe as the "Telstar Alpha Europa"."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.74.252.74 (talk) 18:58, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jai Alai 

message: The article is missing a few informations, mostly about history. You could take over a few informations from the French article. Maxeto0910 (talk) 22:02, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing informations
Talk:Human rights in North Korea

message: why is this being discussed on the page for human rights WITHIN North Korea if this action is explicitly being blamed on the Chinese government? Chinese response to North Korean refugees is a separate issue.  209.33.103.36 (talk) 16:57, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "forced abortion"  

message: The only source I'm seeing to back this statement up comes from Freedom House , which at least needs attribution given that it's a US funded think tank. Looking at their newest report , North Korea isn't even the worst.
I'll give people time to respond before being bold and changing this. Thanks.Stix1776 (talk) 14:55, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, change it.--Jack Upland (talk) 23:59, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Worst in the world" 

message: Hi @Gdeblois19
I see that you reverted my edit, saying that it was in the following paragraphs. Could you please provide a source for "globally", as I'm not seeing it in the text. Thank you for your efforts.Stix1776 (talk) 15:29, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Globally condemned"
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Conscious evolution

message: Think of conscious evolution in these terms before you jump to the conclusion that it should be deleted. 
1. Imagine that I take a flu virus, remove its genetic material, then reinsert into the flu virus the genetic equation which would ultimately modify dna in such a way as to repair the telemarase each time a cell replicates, then I infect you with this virus and as a result the virus amplifies itself infecting almost every cell in your body. Your aging process slows down to such a pace that 300 years is added to your life. Imagine how much you could contribute to wikipedia ;)
:The analogy of a virus trying to infect the body of Wikipedia, and trying to convince the host it was in the host's best interest, is indeed apt. Jayjg (talk) 16:45, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Eugenics is a subset of conscious evolution, they are not one and the same. Transhumanism is a subset of conscious evolution, because the hijacked (huxley was a eugenicist) version of transhumanism rejects conscious evolution. Conscious evolution does not discriminate, it embodies all philosophies, all view points, all strategies of real tangible transformation towards Godhood! Dnagod 02:14, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: You still don't get the point of all this.  We have articles about plenty of theories and beliefs that most wikipedians find offensive or ridiculous.  The difference between those and this is that with those, there is actually something substantial for a non-adherent to identify and write about from an outsider perspective.  We can say, "X people believe Y because Z.  A people say B about Y."  Those articles are acceptable because they don't advocate—they report.  Your article is such a POV sermon, however, that not only is it utterly failing to report, but no one else but you even understands it.  How would you describe it if you didn't believe in it, and weren't trying to convince someone of its worth?  That's the mindset you have to get into to write effectively on here.  It also doesn't help that you have this knee-jerk tendency to accuse anyone you disagree with of being a member of the Jewish cabal.  Postdlf 03:16, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Fragaria

message: It's time to put the redirect back to Strawberry.  The strawberry page has improved substantially since the redirect was removed.  If there is no objection in the next week, I'll put the redirection to strawberry back into place.Nereocystis 07:07, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect to strawberry again

message: there is no mention of this variety of the fruit. the term redirects to a disambig page, i will redirect it here.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:40, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Wild strawberry

message: * Amil-Ruiz, F. et al. ”The Strawberry Plant Defense Mechanism: A Molecular Review”, Plant & Cell Physiology (2011),52(11):1873-1903.
--Ronz (talk) 21:53, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Centralized discussion at Talk:Cranberry#Moved_from_article:_Review_articles_on_possible_health_benefits. --Ronz (talk) 03:03, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Potential reference

message: Yupp, thats why I came to english wiki. Just to get more of your french useless jibberish...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.251.171.229 (talk) 03:38, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: French Illutration

message: This derives from the Latin word for strawberries and has nothing whatsoever to do with "fragrant" or "fragrance" (wikt). I left the previous mistake in place, assuming that an editor picked it up from a bad source or that it represents a commonish misconception. If it was simply a single editor's OR mistake, it's fine to remove it entirely. — LlywelynII 11:15, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Etym