lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:James Stewart (footballer, born 1883)

message: There is a discussion going on about moving the James Stewart dab page to James Stewart (disambiguation) to make room for moving James Stewart (actor) to James Stewart on the basis that the American actor is the primary meaning of "James Stewart".  
That would mean anyone looking for the topic of this article (or any other "James Stewart") by searching for "James Stewart" would get sent to the article about the American actor rather than to the dab page.
The discussion is here.  --Born2cycle (talk) 20:07, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the American actor the primary use of the name, "James Stewart"?
Talk:HMS Montagu (1901)

message: I'm the culprit responsible for the uncited quote from the light keeper.  Unfortunately, when I checked the sources I had included it wasn't there and a new search a few days later failed to find it. A Lundy websitesays the keeper "had to forcefully point out the Officers mistake"   I'm pleased to see the article has been considerably expanded but whilst there are loads of references to the quotation now, I'm also concerned most look like copies of this article. Any suggestions? JRPG (talk) 16:55, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Light Keeper quote and copied text

message: Apologies to user 94.1.4.15, I didn't recheck the source before reverting.  Thanks to Simon Harley for correcting.  JRPG (talk) 08:48, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Following my earlier mistake and having just checked the BBC college of journalism website, I note that the correct RN term is "dismissed the ship"  not "dismissed from the ship" as in the source. I'll change it and add a note. Regards JRPG (talk) 21:41, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Operational history:Grounding and dismissal from ship. 
Talk:Zamboanga City Special Economic Zone Authority

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement.  Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 22:36, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Back from Eternity

message: I dont see how the allegation that Bostwick murdered Tommy's father holds water.
A:  from the "introducing" converstaion, Bostwick is a trusted leutenant to Tommy's father.
B:  Bostwick gets on the plane with Tommy, and gets off with him at Pamama.
C:  Bostwick was looking to have Tommy go on from Panama to Boca Grande by himself.  He gets that arranged with the airline/airport people, then seems to be trying to get back to Tommy's father ( where he thought he ought to be in the first place, from "A" ).  He then reads a paper where he sees that Tommy's father was killed.  He then rushs back to be with Tommy.  If he had killed Tommy's dad, there would be no need to change his mind, he would ( presumably ) already have known that Tommy's dad was dead, and therefore, no need to change his mind/plans.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.197.181.149 (talk) 16:08, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bostwick murders Tommy's father? 

message: I was thrown off the page before I could finish commenting on my edit.  What I wanted to say was, "It's Spangler, not Spanger."  Tightened things up a bit too (we already know they're a couple.)  (See IMDb.)  Kostaki mou (talk) 21:34, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spanglers
Talk:Lumpers and splitters

message: Obviously, I should provide such examples myself, but can't get to that right now and I didn't want to let the thought go that it really could use some examples. Thanks! Bob Enyart, Denver KGOV radio host  (talk) 14:41, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  A couple examples in the biology section would help 

message: Mathematicians like Tim Gowers and Freeman Dyson have written about a distinction in mathematicians between those who prefer to build overarching theories that apply far and wide, vs. those who prefer to attack individual problems, using any fine details available. In Dyson's eloquent words,
This seems to have a place in Lumpers and splitters#Usage in various fields.
A Lesbian (talk) 15:24, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lumpers and splitters in mathematics
Talk:Gül Mosque

message: The page name is half-Turkish (Gül) and half-English (Mosque). This is so for many of the pages about Turkish buildings. Ideally it should be either Gül Cami (Turkish) or Rose Mosque (English). This also affects other pages - for example, Boğaziçi (Turkish) University (English) instead of either Boğaziçi Üniversitesi (Turkish) or Bosphorus University (English). Presumably this is something that has been deemed easiest for users...?  Ealinggirl1954 (talk) 20:48, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I would say easiest for readers. :-) "Mosque" identifies the object category, "Gül" is the native name. In the scientific literature, this "mixed" convention is used for example by Semavi Eyice. "Gül Camii" sounds maybe better for us who know some Turkish, but doubt that the average wikipedia reader knows what a Cami is. BTW, there are hundreds of articles whose page name is "Church of X" where X is the native name (Italian, Spanish, etc.) of the church's saint. "Mosque of the rose" is the English translation, but it is hardly used in the scientific literature. Another reason for not using translated names is that you don't know how far you can go. What should we do with "Eski Imaret Mosque"? Should we name the page "Mosque of the old soup kitchen"? ;-)  Alex2006 (talk) 18:57, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Gül Mosque' mixes Turkish and English
Talk:CRP

message: Certified Risk Planner  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.155.211.15 (talk) 08:43, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Widefox; talk 09:29, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  CRP 

message: I've created
:* the currently-red link to "CRP-Bangladesh", 
which does NOT reflect any misunderstanding on my part, underlying this seemingly obviously superfluous red-link. It would be routine to use CRP-Bangladesh as a red link for  Centre for the Rehabilitation of the Paralysed (in general, or even for the one of that name in the Savar Upazila region of Bangladesh). And it was not such a horrible idea (at the time it was done, and at least for now) for our colleague who did it to have pre-empted that title by making it a blue-linked Rdr to a section about the region the center lies in. (Especially not if there should be an article out there already invoking the "CRP-Bangladesh" link. I haven't checked if that's the case, bcz it doesn't change the appropriateness of what will (perhaps) eventually happen bcz of my quasi-fix of the problem that the Rdr enables.)   The problem i refer to is that the ideal way of dealing with situations like getting users looking for info on that CRP to the single sent we have about it 
::(to wit this one:
::: The nation's one and only specialised rehabilitation hospital, the CRP-Bangladesh centre for the rehabilitation of the paralysed,[10] is located in Savar, about 1 kilometre (0.62 mi) from Savar Bazar.
::in the accompanying article)
is for now far from efficient (for users) if we embody such a "sub-stub" as a free-standing stub.  (And also that i'm not willing to be distracted to the extent of being the one who does the needed topic-area research, in a field where my expertise is pretty close to zero.) The solution to that problem is my creation of Centre for the Rehabilitation of the Paralysed as a red link fulfilling the role that might otherwise have been filled by the above-mentioned Rdr to  Savar Upazila.  That enables the hopefully obvious choice of the (eventually-a-)quick-fix retargeting of the (previously and for now) barely functional CRP-Bangladesh Rdr from Centre for the Rehabilitation of the Paralysed (CRP-Bangladesh) to a presumably-longer-than-one-sentence 'graph (among the handful of 'graphs that already focus more widely on other aspects of the region).--Jerzy•t 06:53, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  CRP-Bangladesh
Talk:Wheeler's delayed-choice experiment

message: There seem to be multiple confusions in this article: first, as to what Wheeler actually believes, and secondly, the ideas surrounding retrograde influence, not to be confused with retrograde causality (retrocausality). So for example in the  two-state vector formalism (TSVF) there is a backward-time component, but it is not causal. It would seem that the Wheeler experiments are fully consistent with TSVF, but this is not mentioned or discussed here. 67.198.37.16 (talk) 18:47, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Retrograde but not "causality" 

message: The article doesn't say. Same thing looking up wheeler quotes on the famous person quotation websites. They quote people but don't say where the quotes came from. It's so frustrating! I need to know for something important I'm writing. 2600:8801:BE31:D300:A8FF:7572:5B76:92C8 (talk) 00:24, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where do the Wheeler quotes come from? Books, papers, interviews, lectures? 

message: I removed an unreferenced (and unverifiable) claim that "experimenters generally say".
The entire point of the subject of this article is comparisons of hypothesis, not polls of personal opinions. Johnjbarton (talk) 14:46, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "experimenters generally say"
Talk:Llanrhychwyn

message: In the quote taken from "The National Gazetteer of Great Britain and Ireland" is Llanberris a typo or an old spelling of Llanberis?
:It is an old Anglicized spelling - it was quite common at one time to double up on consonants, such as "Bettws" (with 2 T's) or Carregog (2 R's) where the modern spelling has the correct single consonant.  Hogyn Lleol (talk) 09:47, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical references 

message: St Rhychwyn church is one of the oldest in Wales, and is Grade 1 listed. Needs an article to itself! Llywelyn2000 (talk) 07:15, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: New article needed
Talk:Clarksburg, Maryland

message: I felt that this was an increasing issue that has really taken hold of the "census-designated area", or something like that, and since it was such a big issue it should be included. I didn't include all the information about the school issue because I personally felt that getting too deep into the issue on a encyclopedia would make it a political page, where politicians can use it as ammunition against each other, although I think did that with the table.
Snakehr3 (talk) 09:40, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: School Enrollment Issue

message: One of the focal points of the new development in Clarksburg is intended to be the downtown Clarksburg Town Center.  Originally slated to be completed years ago, construction has still not yet begun.  The original developer, Newland communities has been fined by the Montgomery County Planning Board for "more than 400 unauthorized changes to plans for Clarksburg Town Center's unbuilt downtown"http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/11/AR2010011103834.html.  Residents are also considering legal action due to special tax assessments in order to pay for new construction being placed on them, lobbied for by Newland homes.http://www.gazette.net/stories/10202010/damanew224052_32534.php
TheAndruu (talk) 21:02, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Worth mentioning Town Center controversy? 

message: On John Clark's wife gravestone the name is spelled Clark. Please
S e 2603:6081:D00:803:E9A1:838:3C6E:17A2 (talk) 20:31, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of town founder Clark no e
Talk:The Mediator

message: Someone needs to find some sources that indicate that this is a dystopian series.  I read this series some time ago and The Mediator almost gives no background on the surroundings of the characters.  There is no dark descriptions of anything; on the contrary, I remember phrases such as "sunny day in Carmel, California" and the like. hbdragon88 (talk) 22:15, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dystopian 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.thebewitchedreader.com/2016/01/happy-new-year-new-releases-im-excited.html https://downtherabbitholeblog.com/2016/04/08/author-spotlight-meg-cabot/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  — Yours, Berrely • Talk∕Contribs 15:29, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Ameritech Cup

message: There is a long, ongoing discussion at WP:Tennis about the tournament tables found in tennis articles on English-language Wikipedia (e.g., this type of table). The discussion is about whether the "official sponsored name" of a tournament - such as Pacific Life Open - or another tournament name without the sponsor - such as Indian Wells Masters - must be used in those articles. Please join the discussion here. Thanks.  Tennis expert (talk) 09:04, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for wider input on discussion at WikiProject Tennis
Talk:Penny from Heaven

message: I think this article shouldn't go through the entire plot of the story. If you'd like to keep it, I'd suggest adding spoiler tags to the article. Also, the article needs to be slightly expanded in some way. ~ Anonymus Wikipedian —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.240.26.184 (talk • contribs) 11:48, 19 June 2008
:
:Wikipedia does not include spoiler warnings. Please see WP:SPOILER. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 18:10, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Moorgreen Hospital

message: I can't find Moorgreen Hospital on the list of buildings maintained at Historic England . The Daily Echo article mentions the workhouse and two gatehouses as "...locally listed..." with no grade number. I don't think the wikipedia article's accurate. 2A02:C7C:D5F6:A300:A453:A87E:7AE1:4464 (talk) 12:36, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Amended in accordance with the source cited. Thanks. Dormskirk (talk) 12:43, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks both. That's so strange, I wonder where we got the grade II from. WaggersTALK 16:13, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grade II listed
Talk:Queen Alexandra Hospital

message: The number if beds was recently changed from the cited 997 to 1200.  The figure of 1200 is actually available (currenlat  however that refers to Portsmouth University NHS Trust which is a superset of QA and may or may not include beds at QA.  In one or two taxiing(loosley) of family for QA visits / outpatient check / work (covering car brakedown) in 2021 I observed double decker Xelabus's on the Fort Southwick shuttle in lieu of stagecoach but more relevant a new build on my favourite North Car Park that may have completed and increased beds above 997.  Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 21:24, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of beds January 2022
Talk:Royal South Hants Hospital

message: Commensurate with the dissolution of all PCTs effective 1st April 2013 (H&SCA) , the site is no longer owned by SCPCT.
I believe actual ownership of the site itself has transferred to NHS Property Services (PropCo) however there is now more than one provider at the site. Solent NHS Trust provide community and mental health services, Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust provide further community services and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust provide acute services, albeit with most having moved over to Southampton General Hospital. There is also now the Royal South Hants Minor Illness/Injuries Unit http://www.royalsouthhantsmiu.nhs.uk/ run by Care UK
81.107.206.139 (talk) 17:37, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  SCPCT dissolution - New providers at site 

message: In updating links to the renamed University Hospital Southampton (UHS), I have also removed the following wording: "It still retains some University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust departments such as out-patient Orthopedics, Diabetic Retinal Screening, The X-Ray Department, The main Pharmacy, Dermatology, ENT, Audiology and a Tuberculosis Service", and just said that it retains a few University Hospital departments.  While it probably did retain these services at the time of the last reconfiguration, there has been a progressive move of UHS services away from the RSH to the other UHS sites.  The UHS website says only that "a small number of our services" are provided at the RSH and I have not been able to verify exactly which ones remain. I have posted the old wording here so that other contributors can investigate further if they wish. Sixsevens (talk) 17:59, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  UHS services
Talk:Southampton General Hospital

message: In the info box against 'Emergency Department' it says 'Yes Accident and Emergency'.  This is technically incorrect, the department is not referred to as an A&E, it is simply an Emergency Department.  My understanding is that the 'accident' name has been removed to try and dissuade people from turning up with a grazed shin etc.
I can't see how to edit this info though...?
Ride the Hurricane (talk) 15:55, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: For reference by other editors, yes it is just called the Emergency Department at this hospital. However, the addition of "Accident & Emergency" for UK hospitals is built into Template:Infobox hospital and cannot be removed from individual articles at this point. CT Cooper · talk 23:14, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accident and Emergency 

message: I have added an NPOV tag because this section gives only one side of the story. Biscuittin (talk) 08:32, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: This section has been edited twice by UHSComms (talk) - the user's only contributions to Wikipedia.  Does this pose a conflict of interest and should their edits be revoked? Zen78 (talk) 12:26, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I have attempted to add some unbiased and referenced extra detail to the clinical situation, although I'm not a Dr.  The CPS and Malaga part of the section need expanding. Zen78 (talk) 21:53, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe this NPOV tag should be released as NHS finally decided to pay for the treatmentLpele (talk) 21:43, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think the tag should be removed yet, since there are still developments in the story. Zen78 (talk) 08:22, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy
Talk:Polstead

message: There is not enought content in Bell's corner for it to be an article. It would be far better for bell's corner to be part of polstead. Now Merged. Wilbysuffolk Talk to me 20:51, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: None of Bell's Corner, Bower House Tye, Whitestreet Green or Polstead Heath contain any meaningful content, so merging them all to Polstead seems worthwhile. Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk) 23:08, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The Bower House Tye article has been recreated in January 2012 with no meaningful content. My undoing of this was itself undone, and the following edit added detail of little note, so I bring the discussion here. Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk) 14:32, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, Whitestreet Green has been recreated, again with no content of note. Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk) 14:33, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  Oppose all. Enough content for a stub. Even in Poland and The Netherlands they consider it a separate article worthy so it's quite odd the English language version shouldn't for British hamlets. As a geographic place (hamlet) they're all notable. There is more content added to the articles although more is always welcome. Agora (talk) 17:30, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: But there is no content other than such a place exists and has a few listed buildings. No notable info whatever. Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk) 21:56, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  Well the info itself is notable. I agree it's not much, but in my opinion enough for a stub. Agora (talk) 07:52, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  Listed buildings aren't that notable, for instance there are over 100 in Lavenham and the same goes for Long Melford. Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk) 07:56, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

text: I've merged the article again due to clear consensus. Wilbysuffolk (Talk to me!) 22:30, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger
Talk:Long Melford

message: He used 'Long Melford' as a synonym for boxing, or fighting "Do you use [practise] Long Melford?". Arthur Conan Doyle mentions it in his parody of Borrow 'Borrowed Scenes'.  Why is this?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.153.224.95 (talk) 23:17, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: George Borrow

message: I feel that there is little merit in having a separate article for Rodbridge Corner. It has a tiny population, little of significance has happened there (as far as I am aware) and it is effectively  part of Long Melford the village. It is definitely part of the parish of Long Melford, and since the Long Melford article covers both of these it seems best to put it in this context. Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk) 09:43, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think you are misrepresenting ILEW if you are suggesting his/her comment in that discussion was in favour of writing about all of them. Quite the opposite. But regardless, the number of listed buildings in Long Melford has absolutely no bearing at all on this discussion. Nancy talk 07:31, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, being Grade II listed does not indicate notability. As I state in the discussion that Crouch, Swale refers to I wrote that such buildings are not remarkable and the editor is completely misinterpreting my comment. Regardless, though there may be much of merit to have content on in Long Melford there is little to nothing in Rodbridge Corner and hence my suggestion that it does not need a separate article. Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk) 10:56, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rodbridge Corner 
Talk:Ioflupane (123I)

message: Excuse me, but I'm very new here.
In what way is this spam? DaTSCAN is the tradename of a commonly used diagnostic agent. I don't work for GE, I work in a hospital, in part with patients with Parkinson's! I'm sure some of them would like to dig up information on the drugs they are given.
A little guidance would be useful rather than deleting my hard work! Jonnylaney (talk) 11:14, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah sorry. I was too hasty. I have run my formatting script over your article to clean it up for you. Cheers, Sting_au  Talk 11:27, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem, I can see how it could appear to be advertising at a quick glance. No harm done. Thanks for your help Jonnylaney (talk) 11:30, 23 November 2007 (UTC)