lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Safety Training (The Office)

message: I am going through several articles and changing instances of "Dunder-Mifflin" to "Dunder Mifflin" (no hyphen) as it is the proper "spelling" of the company name (see Talk page at Dunder Mifflin). Just leaving a note to say that I've gone through this page. :) Fieryrogue 17:03, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Dunder Mifflin

message: What's with all the references to long-sleeve t-shirts in this episode.  anyone know?
216.165.95.5 22:20, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Long Sleeve T 

message: As an occupational safety person, I am somewhat distressed to look for a work-related safety training article and find nothing but a discussion of a television program.  Do you suppose it would be okay if I write a "Safety Training" article discussing compliance with OSHA's regulations on training employees to work safely?  (tongue only partly in cheek)  Paulburnett (talk) 21:59, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  How About An Article on "Safety Training" As In OSHA Training? 

message: Very funny episode! The band "Camping in Alaska" samples dialogue from this episode at the beginning of "i just want to kickflip into the sunset and disappear." Could be relevant :) 192.249.3.142 (talk) 04:16, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pop culture section?
Talk:Karel Čurda

message: This article says 0.5 million Reichsmark whereas the Operation Anthropoid article says 1 million. Which is correct?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.254.147.84 (talk) 11:46, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: On the Czech version of Wikipedia, it is said that the bounty was 2 million Reichsmark and it was split this way: 0.5 million to Karel Čurda, the same amount to another prominent traitor Viliam Gerik, the rest was split between 7 German and 53 Czech minor informers.—dqd; 19:26, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Karel Teige

message: I updated the list of works using the Chech Wikipedia's cs:Karel Teige article as a source. That article included:
* Jindřich Štyrský, Praha 1948 (zakázáno, vyšlo v ineditním sborníku Znamení zvěrokruhu 1951)
I decided not to include this on the English Wikipedia article as Jindřich Štyrský seems to be the co-author and not the title. It's possible it's a book mentioned on https://slam-livre.fr/sites/default/files/catalogs/files/101_czech_20books_2012_202009.pdf which I'll copy here as it's a bookseller's catalog and thus updated periodically.
: 28 (STYRSKY) Lautreamont, Compte de, Isadore Ducasse MALDOROR Prague, Odeon/Fomek, 1929. Illustrated by Jindrich Styrsky. Small 4to. 123 pp., with 12 full-page illustrations by J.Štyrský Black paper wraps with a yellow and black printed Label. Deckled edge. One of a limited edition of 300, this being one of 51-300 on Antik paper. 123 pp., with 12 full-page illustrations in lithography by J.Štyrský. One of 300 numbered copies , of which nos. 1-25 were handcolored and signed by the artist; 26-50 printed on Holland van Gelder; and nos 51-300 on Antik paper.(Bibliofilská Edice, Odeonu, 8).
: One of the RAREST OF STYRSKY'S ILLUSTRATED BOOKS. Type and book design by Karel Teige. In fine condition.
: "Teige writes a study of the work of le comte de Lautreamont, which he appends to a selection from 'The Song of Maldorador'. Together with the poet Horejsi, Teige cooperates with Philippe Soupault on the translation and the preparation for a bibliographical edition of the latter's work. Teige also designs cover, the typographical arrangement, and the plates for the book. Illustrations are produced by Styrsky. Part of this study also appears in "Pisen o Maldororovi," ReD 2, no. 7 (1929): 229-234. In July, the book is confiscated by the censors for being morally offensive. but the publisher Fromek manages to sell all 300 copies. " Eric Dluhosch. .See (Bibliofilská Edice Odeonu, 8,).(See: Styrský, Toyen, Heisler, Paris 1982, pp.13-14; Poetismus p. 312).
That mentions a Teige plus Štyrský collaboration that likely should be included in the bibliographies for both people once some details are verified.
The dates mentioned in that seller listing though don't line up with a 1948 publication, banned by censors, and then released as part of a collection in 1951 that's mentioned on the Czech Wikipedia. --Marc Kupper|talk 21:12, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jindřich Štyrský
Talk:London Suite (play)

message: There is a move discussion in progress on User:Sebh007/London Suite which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 09:01, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: There is a move discussion in progress on User talk:Sebh007 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 09:16, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: There is a move discussion in progress on User talk:Sebh007/London Suite which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 04:31, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Aurora Central High School

message: Well done. You have an infobox and refs but more required to avoid deletion or merging with nearby schools. Your school deserves its own page. Victuallers 23:28, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: assess
Talk:Dream for an Insomniac

message: This movie title is wrong! It's supposed to be Dream FOR an Insomniac, not Dream of an Insomniac. That's why nothing is linking to it.
:fixed (not by me). needs expansion. Maybe someone who reads italian, german or polish could translate their articles. (theirs are better, which is weird)75.61.140.150 (talk) 06:27, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Article title
Talk:Katherine DeMille

message: I have commented out the "Hollywood Forever Cemetery" listing for "Burial place" in the article's infobox. The source that was cited says, "Cremated ... her ashes were returned to the family." Eddie Blick (talk) 03:52, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "Burial place" from infobox
Talk:Katherine Tingley

message: There are currently several groups of theosophists in the U.S., possibly the largest being headquartered at Wheaton, IL, and styling itself the Theosophical Society in America.  My understanding is that it is made up of the successors of the group of ~200 who left Point Loma and returned east in Tingley's time.  All NA groups seem to be on friendly terms, these days, buying each others' books, hosting each others' speakers, but they have so far never reunited into one organization.  My question concerns the original movement from NY to Point Loma.  Did that happen immediately when Judge and Besant fell out, or after his death, under Tingley's leadership.  As her ascent was kept secret for a year, I'm thinking there may have been sexist concerns about a female leader (despite historic female leadership!).  Also, she was already living at Loma with Philo, and she is usually credited with the move, but "Judge left..." implies that he left NY, so where did he take them, if not Point Loma?  The compond in Wheaton didn't exist yet, to my knowledge.  Anybody know? rags (talk) 10:38, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The group seems to have been sizeable and well-endowed: they built two schools, a clinic, and an orphanage in short order.   rags (talk) 10:43, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  split
Talk:Book collecting in China

message: I believe this topic is interesting, but does not justify an own article in the current state and should be merge to/with book collecting. --Poeloq 23:32, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: that's fine... just go ahead. Cheers.--K.C. Tang 01:12, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Doctor Father

message: The links are wrong. The target is a completely different topic.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.187.98.144 (talk) 08:50, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strawberry Bubblegum
Talk:Kazimierz Twardowski

message: By Polish (and Russian) Wikipedia, he died in Milanówek. Any sources? --Oop (talk) 09:23, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Place of death
Talk:Kees van Baaren

message: Just now, in a Zoom interview with Spektral Quartet, George Lewis said that he considers van Baaren to be "one of his musical grandparents", saying that he (Lewis) and Misha Mengelberg had listened to van Baaren recordings together.  Acwilson9 (talk) 01:59, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misc.
Talk:Kelvin Lancaster

message: For a criticism of Lancaster's theory of quality, see Peter Bowbrick, Limitations of Lancaster’s theory of Consumer Demand, PhD Thesis, Henley Management College, [1994.http://bowbrick.org.uk/Quality/peter_bowbrick_on_quality.htm] 
77.99.100.12 (talk) 13:36, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ken Wood (manufacturer)

message: Not sure why it says it doesn't cite any references because it is showing 3 references.  Also, the first part of the article (before I started editing it) appears to have been copied from http://www.makingthemodernworld.org.uk/people/BG.0126/ which is a reference in itself, isn't it? Johnalexwood (talk) 01:51, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Citing references

message: The recent addition of the prohometools link looks like spam to me?Johnalexwood (talk) 09:25, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Spam link?
Talk:Kenji Urada

message: Removed WP:PROD, This person appears to meet WP:N given that there are several articles that come up when searching his name.  If nothing else, notable for being known as the first person to be incorrectly considered to be the first person killed by a robot.  XeroxKleenex (talk) 01:36, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: XeroxKleenex "the first person to be incorrectly considered to be the first person killed by a robot" is nonsense. This unfortunate death was not the first one due to a robot, so arguably fails notability but could be included in the first death as a redirect to that article. I will mark as such. Widefox; talk 13:57, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm just not seeing the nonsense in it.  It's accurate.  Notability is established easily enough by the large number of internationally published articles claiming that he was the first person killed by a robot.  It's a short article, but he was also only notable for a single event, his unfortunate death.  That's still notable, given the publicity surrounding it.  I don't see the confusion, nor do I see the lack of notability.  I'll leave the tags in place, but I don't see why you feel they're necessary. XeroxKleenex (talk) 02:52, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

message: Kenji Urada is also a band.
:That appears to be true.  I haven't been able to find anything to establish notability, though to be fair I'm not terribly familiar with the music press.  If notability is established for the band, then I'd support moving this page to Kenji Urada (robot fatality) and putting a disambiguation page here, with links to the article about the person and Kenji Urada (band).  I'm not sure it's worth doing if the band article is just going to be removed for non-notability, this place is full of deletionists.  XeroxKleenex (talk) 15:47, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: So it turns out that the band is named for this Kenji Urada.  I'd say that actually adds to his notability.  I'm withdrawing support for moving this page, if the band becomes notable they can have Kenji Urada (band) and a link from this article.  Found that info here:  https://functionmusic.wordpress.com/2012/06/19/john-and-yoko-if-we-were-by-kenji-urada/?fbclid=IwAR2EDvFmZw3javtGZvXt-8mGcU5b9OiRavlKVO55p5zVKTbYCCgegBW4Khw - not RS enough to make it a ref in the article, but appears to be a valid explanation for the band name.  XeroxKleenex (talk) 08:03, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kenji Urada: the band
Talk:Non-penetrative sex

message: I cannot see photos Rajput joginder (talk) 09:28, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos 

message: Why did no one delete the painting of a monk having sex with a woman? I thought it would be considered offensive material in Wikipedia since there are a lot of Catholics in Wikipedia who would be shocked to see the painting, the monk is naked and having sex with a woman which is against Catholicism  --Eddiitt0 (talk) 16:35, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:NOTCENSORED, "Attempting to ensure that articles and images will be acceptable to all readers, or will adhere to general social or religious norms, is incompatible with the purposes of an encyclopedia." I see you also posted this on 4 or more article talk pages. --GRuban (talk) 16:47, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

text: Read the link I posted. We don't delete images solely based on whether or not they are offensive or whether or not we like them. --GRuban (talk) 17:38, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why it was not removed? 

message: thumb
 41.114.161.184 (talk) 23:20, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Cannolis (talk) 23:27, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 31 January 2023 

message: I don’t feed her
Matthew
mom
dad
Jesse
name 64.121.127.49 (talk) 14:58, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  I don’t be there 

message: Hey, everyone! I would love to know if the new section "Manual sex" and its source are good enough for this article? I created this because most people understand "mutual masturbation" as either two partners watching each other stimulate their own genitals or simultaneously stimulating each other's genitals. Please let me know if I need to fix anything! Autisticeditor 20 (talk) 23:48, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  New section 

message: Hello! I think Kunyaza should be mentioned under the Non-exclusively non-penetrative section, given kunyaza involves a non-penetrative and a penetrative phase in progression. This would open up conversation and help readers learn about other methods to reach full satisfaction. 108.46.18.172 (talk) 18:28, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better mention of Kunyaza
Talk:Andersonville (film)

message: I removed this bit from the Production section of the article since it has no source and doesn't seem especially relevant.
"In an interesting twist, one of Frankenheimer's good friends and favorite actors, Burt Lancaster died the morning of the first day of shooting, October 20, 1994. He and Frankenheimer had made several films together in the 60's and it depressed him. He was heard to say by his personal assistant "Why couldn't it have been Richard Harris?"."
Yojimbo1941 (talk) 14:09, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Frankenheimer, Burt Lancaster, and Richard Harris
Talk:Khuang Aphaiwong

message: Hi there, i noticed that the article claims that Khuang's second term was due to the victory of the Democrat Party. But this contradicts what is said here on two grounds: 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democrat_Party_(Thailand)
Firstly, the Democrat Party did not exist. 
Secondly, it says that Pridi had won the election, but rejected the nomination
I dont know which is more accurate, but the democrat party article seems more plausible, especially since, from what I know, the Pridi actually unseated Khuang merely 52 days later. 
Could the admin check and fix it?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Qwartz2003 (talk • contribs) 14:52, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Khuang's second term
Talk:Complement factor I

message: Please will somebody help by editing two details in the table summarizing the molecule:
1. The picture I uploaded does not show
2. The PDB link in the table under the available structures should point to PDB ID 2XRC
I have not found a way of editing the table!
Thanks
Pietro1968 (talk) 09:54, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The "infobox" has the wrong uniprot for Human. It should be P05156. But it is too cryptic for me to fix. 129.67.46.139 (talk) 10:30, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Uniprot code wrong
Talk:Berkshire pig

message: Why is it relevant that there are less than 300 purebred sows in New Zealand? Presumably, the majority of pigs are in Britain there 500 in fishland.-gadfium 23:38, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: New Zealand connection?

message: vandalism, perhaps just a nonsensical statement
"Today's animals descend from the herd maintained by the House of Windsor 300 years ago.[2]"
makes no sense.  is it vandalism ?Eregli bob (talk) 15:27, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know about vandalism, perhaps just ignorance on the original contributers part?
I have amended the section to better describe the area of origin, & removed the 'Windsor' reference, as it is inaccurate. If anyone knows more about the  Monarchy's role in breeding Berkshire pigs for 300 years, please edit accordingly. (The House of Windsor descends from the Saxe-Coburg-Gothas/Hanoverians, but didn't adopt the name until 1917, because of anti-German sentiment during the 1st World War).  Archolman 21:31, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Origins
Talk:Marigold (2007 film)

message: This is a charming film, I tried to explicate a little more. I am a little confused by the references to both Jodhpur and Jaipur, they are different cities, yes? I did not record the film so I couldn't check the references but I will watch it again soon and try to listen carefully. I deleted the part about the Maharaja (Prem's father - is that the correct title?) sending someone to fetch Marigold to the wedding - I believe it is important to write about what actually happens in the film in the plot section without referring to information that might be in the script but is not actually in the film.
 Beadmatrix (talk) 01:38, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot Theme and Summary

message: i was so enthusiastic to watch this movie, i watched it today.
its a really good movie. the way its presented, written, directed and acted.
it was flop, just because the indian crowds never accepts the movie that is either in english (due to communication gap) or high tech.  or might be if they are not "masala genre"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kay khan kakar (talk • contribs) 18:36, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  marigold (2007)
Talk:Complete Heyting algebra

message: Something looks a little strang to me. Morphsims of Frames are just said to be (monotone) functions preserving finite meets and arbitrary joins. But isn't it required for them to also preserve bottoms and tops?
For instance, given:
- A = {a, b | a ≤ b}
- B = {α, β, γ, δ | α ≤ β ≤ γ ≤ δ}
two complete lattices (with ∧ = min and ∨ = max), there is a function:
φ : {a ↦ β ; b ↦ γ}
which meets the conditions of a morphism of Frames, but for which we do not have φ(⊥)=⊥ or φ(⊤)=⊤.
So, should a morphism of Frames preserve top and bottom? If not, I think it should be noted, as it is noted that morphisms of Frames do not necessarily preserves implication.
Sedrikov (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 10:18, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Morphisms of Frames 

message: What is known about locale-valued continuous functions on point-set topological spaces? I am interested in locale-valued generalization of an ultrametric, i.e. such metric on a point-set space, defined by open "balls", that two "balls" can intersect non-trivially (unlike spaces with real-valued ultrametric), but the intersection must also be a "ball". Incnis Mrsi (talk) 11:47, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Locale-valued functions
Talk:CD46

message: How/Can we use the RNA expression profiles in the infobox to tell ? (Why are there 3 RNA expression profiles in the infobox ? Which are mice and which human ? Is one a foetus ?) Expanding the profile image seems to show that all tissue types express CD46 to some extent. - Rod57 (talk) 13:57, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which tissues express CD46 and expose it
Talk:Krunoslav Draganović

message: This article has extreme POV and has falsified facts contained within it. Using such stereotypes as ˝hyper-nationalist/Ustaše diaspora press is an obvious generalization and is the the subjective opinion of the person who edited this entry. No not everyone who fought and disagreed against Communistic rule were ˝hyper-nationalist/Ustaše˝ like this idiot would like everyone to make out. Stop putting you your Communistic POV into this article.
Secondly the remark that ˝up to 600,000 people were killed˝ is both unnecessary and proven to be unfactual through studies conducted by a notable Serb and Croatian researches who came to the same conclusion of up to 100,000 Ustaše victims during WW2. Unless you would like to verify the proper facts and thus include it, then I suggest that you do not include it as it has no bearing upon the main person in question and no bearing upon his activities. 
Signed OBJECTIVE TRUTH!!!!!!!!!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Objective Truth (talk • contribs) 01:26, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ladislas Farago

message: Faragó's wartime activities seem to have included a stint with N°3(X) troup of the British 10 Commandos. In  "The King's Own Loyal Enemy Aliens: German And Austrian Refugees in Britain's Armed Forces, 1939-45" by Peter Leighton-Langer (http://www.amazon.com/Kings-Own-Loyal-Enemy-Aliens/dp/0853036918/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1297620039&sr=1-1) Faragó is on the list of 125 men of this unit, and also later mentrioned as having been in 77 Coy of the Pioneer Corps, before recruited for SOE, but later moving on to the Commandos. Can't give you page numbers as I'm using a foreign language edition.
L'Etranger (talk) 18:10, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This is totally random, and the dates don't match, but could there be a relationship the subject of this article and this adorable moppet?
http://rememberme.ushmm.org/pages/child/ladislavfarago-259/ jengod (talk) 23:16, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mary, Lady Heath

message: I have corrected stated year of this marriage from 1928 to 1927, supported by Burke's Peerage (citation) and other annual biographical reference books.Cloptonson (talk) 14:48, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I contest the stated divorce year of 1930, the 1938 Burke's Peerage used in citation when I researched her husband's marriages indicates it as 1932 and gives no detail on the divorce proceedings beyond indicating he was the petitioner, so does not mention it being a "Reno divorce". Another source will have to be cited for the Reno nature.  I am delaying altering the year until I have heard from other users any explanation they may offer.Cloptonson (talk) 15:19, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Added two references to Reno divorce in 1930. MilborneOne (talk) 17:12, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you.  In the Family section, I have moved the citation to Burke's Peerage to just after the date of marriage to Sir James Heath, because Burke's Peerage does not name the alleged wedding venue, against which I have raised a citation need.Cloptonson (talk) 10:11, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Marriage to Sir James Heath

message: *Google Search : "Mrs. G. A. R. Williams." Lady Mary Heath -wikiXb2u7Zjzc32 (talk) 20:40, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: "Mrs. G. A. R. Williams." Lady Mary Heath -wiki - Google Search

message: The section on Heath's athletics career mentions her membership of a redlinked organisation called the International Olympics Council. Is this a separate organisation from the International Olympic Committee? If nobody objects within a couple of weeks, I'm minded to be bold and change the link ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 12:48, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm I haven't been able to come up with any online mentions of an IO Council, everything re-directs to the IO Committee. It must be an editing error. Good catch and yes do change it. MurielMary (talk) 10:02, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  Done: thanks for your input (I'm not much of a sports fan!) ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 17:58, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  International Olympic Council? 
Talk:Harriet the Spy (film)

message: :::When did this movie released on VHS, DVD, and possibly Laserdisc? --24.147.1.197 (talk) 22:04, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit Request 4/20/14 /Home Media Release