lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Template talk:G7-Foreign

message: Have the Russian Ministers all been fired? Therequiembellishere 02:33, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

message: There are plausible reasons for modifying the navbox templates at the bottom of the page at G8.  An opportunity for discussion needs to be part of any process which precedes change. Three arguable improvements are:
A. Combining two of the current navboxes at the bottom of the page?
:* template name coould be —Template:G8?  At present, this is a redirect to Template:Db-g8, one of the Speedy deletion templates
:* new template would be similar to —Template:Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation
:* this would mean removing  —Template:G8 nations?
:* this would mean removing  —Template:G8 summits?
B. Deleting the current leaders navbox? 
:This is a poor subject for a navbox because leaders change irregularly over time.  The functional utility of this navbox is not greater or better than one which only shows member nations.
:* this would mean removing  —Template:Current G8 Leaders?
:* this would mean removing  —Template:G8-Foreign?
:* this would mean removing  —Template:G8-Finance?
:* this would mean removing  —Template:G8-Defense?
:* this would mean removing  —Template:G8-Justice?
:* this would mean removing  —Template:G8-Interior?
C.Standardize/harmonize to "G8" without hyphen? "G7" and "G6" without hyphens?
: Only G-15 must have a hyphen, consistent with the group's official web site?
D. Perhaps decision-making may be helped by comparing an array of similar groups and templates?  
:*21 in group> Template:APEC? 
:*Template:Current APEC Leaders?
:
:*18 in groupp> Template:G-15 nations?
:*Template:Group of 15 Leaders?
:
:*8 in group> Template:D8 nations?
: 
:*4 in group>Template:BRIC countries?
:*Template:Current BRIC Leaders?
:*Template:BRIC summits?
:
:*3 in group>Template:Trilateral meeting?
:*2 in group> Template:G-3?
:
:*No navboxes yet> G77•G33•G24•G10•G5
:
*20 in group> Template:G20?
*Template:Current G20 Leaders?
*Template:G-20 leaders' summits?
:
:
*9 in group> Template:G8 nations?
*Template:Current G8 Leaders?
*Template:G8-Foreign?
*Template:G8-Finance?
*Template:G8-Defense?
*Template:G8-Justice?
*Template:G8-Interior?
*Template:G8-Central Bank?
*Template:G8 summits?
What is the best next step for this article? for similar articles? --Tenmei (talk) 23:51, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Navbox consensus
Talk:Tokyo Ska Paradise Orchestra

message: Until someone can find something to back up the claim that they can be considered a ska punk band, I'm removing it from the genres list. If you've heard any of their music, its pretty obvious that there are no elements of ska punk present besides an occasional increase in speed (which alone, of course, does not make it qualify). Glassbreaker5791 02:56, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ska punk? 

message: The following has no sources:
*Their cover of the classic Tetris theme song is often mislabeled on file-sharing sites as being performed by Less Than Jake, The Toasters and Reel Big Fish, among others.
*Upon beginning work on their 8th record, Arkestra, Tokyo Ska Paradise Orchestra decided it was time to bring in another vocalist after the death of original singer Cleanhead Gimura. Cleanhead's younger brother, Rui Sugimura, was brought in to sing, but it did not work out- Sugimura was gone within a year.
Can sources be provided? If so, I don't think it's trivia (Trivia being unimportant information), so please incorporate the material back into the main article. - Tbsdy lives (talk) 22:45, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced material 

message: I have added a timeline of band members. I haven't used the timeline template before so if you see anything wrong with it please make corrections!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ambo 100 (talk • contribs) 16:03, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timeline help required
Talk:Octopus Pie

message: I've updated the page to around what I wanted, since it is only starting out and hasn't got the same available content as other web comic pages. I plan on adding either an image or sample strip, providing I can get consent of the Author.Vimy 101 04:08, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :I'm not sure this is going to meet the notability requirements for web content, but I'll give you a while to improve it. -- Flyguy649 talk contribs 03:07, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability Discussion 

message: if you go to the site it no longer updates regularly. it's a good comic but i wonder if it meets the notability requirements. maybe this page should be recommended for deletion? 128.153.207.152 (talk) 03:31, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The update schedule has Changed 

message: It was badly overdue, like 2 years overdue. Feel free to fix it up if anybody touches this page anytime soon. 74.67.122.72 (talk) 22:18, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updated The Plot Arc Section 
Talk:The Light Brigade (The Outer Limits)

message: It would be interesting to find some citable materials about the origin of the story.  Original research would suggest the weapon featured, as well as the mission itself, is more like the "Little Doctor"" of Ender's Game, than the Hiroshima bomb as described in the current article.  If anyone has a verifiable source for this, it would be a nice inclusion. Exerda 02:56, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Inspired by "Little Doctor" of ''Ender's Game''?
Talk:Peter Duncan (Australian politician)

message: The article is deficient in that it does not contain mention of this topic, sources about this http://www.samemory.sa.gov.au/site/page.cfm?u=648 (see SA Law Reform) and speech at Homosexual Histories Conference, Adelaide 13-14 November 2015‏ https://www.facebook.com/peter.duncan2/posts/10158221448003136 Alex Sims (talk) 00:52, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Homosexual Law reform 

message: There is an autobiographical piece at https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10156093998775205&set=a.409935210204&type=3&theater worth mining for facts Alex Sims (talk) 01:00, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Time as attorney general
Talk:Book cover

message: Book covers & Fair use
I think this might be vthe appropriate place to discuss
the Copyright issue of the Fair use of Book covers.
:At least one editor thinks Wikipedia does not have the right
to use copyrighted book cover in articles about the Author or the book itself/
:What do you think?
:Yours truly, --Ludvikus 03:09, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:USS Rogers (DD-876)

message: Where can I obtain a roster of crew members on the Rogers between 1953 and 1960?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by E1montez (talk • contribs) 15:12, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  crew of uss rogers between 1953- 1960 

message: As she is now a museum ship (hopefully "forever"), I think this article should be moved to "ROKS Jeong Ju". José Luiz  talk 01:47, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move
Talk:USS Stribling (DD-867)

message: I must dispute the incident concerning the French submarine.  I was a sonar tech on board and had worked closely with the ARL crew and the sonar mods.  At no time was sonar ever notified of such incident.  I have kept in touch with an EW that was on board during that time and does not know of any such incident.--75.206.175.109 (talk) 02:50, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I will look into this today and make any necessary changes. Thanks, - Samf4u (talk)  15:42, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Head and Master law

message: Currently, this page introduces no information beyond what's present at Kirchberg v. Feenstra, and it seems unlikely to me that it will evolve far beyond that. In the context of a more in-depth discussion of that case, mention of the 2015 Supreme Court decision on same-sex marriage seems reasonable; but in a separate stub article it comes across much more WP:COATRACK to me. Anyway, the general concept of a "head and master law" seems simple enough that it doesn't require a separate page for explanation - unless there are more examples to be discussed? 76.64.33.209 (talk) 08:37, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd think the history of these laws would exist somewhere and be enough to make this into a full article, unless it was very rare to explicitly codify coverture.  As far as merger: I would think that the concept of patriarchial legal identity in general would have its own article somewhere, but I don't know what its name would be.  I can't find it, though I've found articles on other subtopic of it: coverture (the common law subtopic), marital power (the civil law legal system subtopic), baron and feme (a subtopic of coverture). --Closeapple (talk) 12:37, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger
Talk:Gaikoku bugyō

message: Given the current status of this article, I'm uncertain about adding the following list:
The prefix kaibō-gakari meaning "in charge of maritime defense" was used with the titles of some bakufu officials to designate those who bore a special responsibility for overseeing coastal waters, and by implication, for dealing with matters involving foreigners -- for example, kaibō-gakari-ōmetsuke which later came to be superseded by the term gaikoku-gakari.Beasley, p. 323.
List of kaibō-gakari
:
* Toki Yorimune (1845-1846, 1855-1858), kaibō-gakari-ōmetsuke.Beasley, p. 341. 
* Arao Narimasa (1852-1854), kaibō-gakari-metsuke.Beasley, p. 331.
* Izawe Tadanari (1854-1858), kaibō-gakari-metsuke.[see above]
* Iwasa Masayoshi (1856-1858), kaibō-gakari-ōmetsuke.Beasley, p. 334.
:List of gaikoku-gakari
:
* Oguri Tadamasa (1859-1860), gaikoku-gakari-metsuke.Beasley, p. 338.
* Izawa Tadanari (1858-1863), gaikoku-gakari-ōmetsuke.[see above]
* Ikeda Nagaaki (1861-1863, 1863), gaikoku-gakari-metsuke.[see above]
For the time being, I'm parking the list here ....  --Tenmei (talk) 23:13, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: ''Kaibō-gakari''
Talk:Yahoo! Music Unlimited

message: Has Yahoo Music To Go been canceled?
It appears that it has, and I've added a new heading and revised opening paragraph. I verified that there are no live links available to purchase the service and referenced a recent article in WSJ that hinted at its discontinuation. Whosten 17:28, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Van Tran Flat Bridge

message: @Pi.1415926535, This is my response to the GA review. First and foremost, thank you for reviewing this article. I apologize for the piecemeal response, hopefully my notes are coherent.
*Length and coverage: 
::*Simply put, this is all I could find. For posterity's sake, I re-reviewed WP:LIBRARY's database, Newspapers.com, and Google Scholar again before writing this response. I found a couple of sources to fill out the history/buttress citations. I'm really having to dig deep on this one.  
*Relevance: 
::*Removed explicit address
::*Removed nearby location sentence
::*Changed to footnote
*Support for claims:
::*Bendo Bridge was built in 1860 but not actually placed in service till 1913 (it was originally built in a separate location and later modified). Every source I've found says Van Tran Flat is the oldest.
::* ACK!! Sloppy!!! I had FN 1 and FN 2 swapped around, fixed. 
::*I separated the sections into description and history. I made mention of the conflicting lengths.
*Citations: 
::*Per Wikipedia:What the Good article criteria are not, citation format is not a GA concern (Although I myself am guilty of demanding it in some reviews myself). Regardless, I cleaned these up. 
::*Cite 7 is a text version of a historical marker (information on editorial standards). While yes it's a user generated site, the historical placard from which I'm citing is not, I added a note in the ref to make this clearer. 
::*Citations 1 and 5 come from a reputable source (new york state covered bridge society) and a WP:BLOG justification is easy enough here. They are a nonprofit who works for the restoration and documentation of covered bridges in NY state.
*Other Issues:
::*Gallery is used in order to avoid MOS:SANDWICH
::*External Link section removed
::*Expanded the infobox
::*Coordinates appear to be correct when I checked
🏵️Etrius ( Us) 03:39, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA review response
Talk:Arion (disambiguation)

message: Arion is also a japanese electronics brand that makes effects pedals for electric guitar.  As far as I know they've been around since the 80's.  They're discontinued chorus pedal (the SCH-1 model, not the current SCH-Z) is highly sought after.
--Bfarb 04:00, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. I added a link to Arion (company) -Solarstrider (talk) 18:02, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arion Effects
Talk:Chestnut-headed bee-eater

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Merops leschenaulti - Kaeng Krachan.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on March 11, 2013. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2013-03-11. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:23, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Merops leschenaulti - Kaeng Krachan.jpg]] to appear as POTD
Talk:Stafford–Manchester line

message: Would it not make sense to merge this with the Stone to Colwich Line into this and rename the article Stafford and Colwich to Manchester Line? I thought that since both routes had a common history it would make sense to combine them. And it would avoid the need for the Stone to Colwich stub article. G-13114 (talk) 03:12, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible renaming

message: I'm not sure I understand why this article has been created as it is, as the line between Stoke and Colwich Junction, is and always has been more important than the Stafford branch as it has always been the route used by London-Manchester expresses. I would propose one of several actions:
# We rename this article the Manchester-Colwich Junction line and create a new article for the Stone to Norton Bridge branch and merge the existing Stone to Colwich Line article into this.
# We combine this with the Stone-Colwich article and rename this article as something like Manchester-Colwich Junction-Stafford lines.
# Like 2, but we combine this with the Stone-Colwich article and rename this article as something like West Coast Main Line - Stoke-on-Trent routes 
# Like 3 but Stoke-on-Trent routes (WCML) or Stoke-on-Trent branches (WCML).
I personally would favour 3 or 4. Does anyone have any thoughts? G-13114 (talk) 19:36, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: In general I prefer not to make up our own names, like you have suggested above, and to go with what reliable sources identify the separate routes to be and how they are known. Also, have you placed links to this discussion on any relevant project pages? I know previous rail line rename/merge proposals have resulted in considerable debate. Rcsprinter123 (yarn) 15:36, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Absent sourcing that either uses different names or lumps these two lines together, I think they should be left separate. I will remove the merge proposal templates, because there doesn't seem to be consensus almost two months later.  — Amakuru (talk) 09:20, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal for renaming and merger
Talk:Wang Jiaxiang

message: I agree - It meanders from the point, has very bad English grammar (Whether this is due to incompetence or simply bad translations) and lacks titles etc.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.146.132.119 (talk) 11:09, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit needed 

message: carried out their policy of extremism and leftism, the CPC suffered enormous losses in their rebellion against the Kuomintang and had to retreat from big cities to their base in Jiangxi. Then Wang got promotion to be member of Central Bureau of CPC, Foreign Commissioner of China Soviet Republic Interim Central Government, and then Director of Political Department or General Commissar of the Chinese Red Army.
Bo Gu and military advisor from Comintern Otto Braun (Li De) still applied the policy of leftism which resulted in the CPC's great loss in their military confrontation with Kuomintang army in their base and Long March began as an excuse for withdraw. It was in the course of Long March, Wang began to realize the cruel reality of revolution was much different from anything he read in books. He showed his friendship to the so-called old CPC members such as Mao Zedong and Zhou Enlai. When they were in litters and held discussions about the future of the Chinese revolution, they had made a plan to change the status quo. Subsequently in the Zunyi Conference, Bo Gu and Li De were dismissed command in military. As reward for their defection, Zhang Wentian replaced Bo Gu as General Secretary of CPC, and Wang took the military command by a three-men group with Mao and Zhou.
this was entirely unsourced and poorly written.Happy  monsoon day 01:47, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: moved out from the article
Talk:Sub Noize Records

message: This page should not be deleted due to the fact that I am currently working on it. I need to find the information as to make it worthy of it's own page, but that is taking a bit longer then expected. This page should also remain up due to the fact that it is a significant section to the Kottonmouth Kings Wikipedia Page.
: I've put an under constuction tag up which should give you a few days to fill in the article.  --NeilN 04:32, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There is now a lot of POV language in the article which needs to be removed. --NeilN 13:02, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Ian A. Anderson

message: The long list of all details on every record is outside the usual practice. If records are significant they should have an article of their own and if not just the title in a discography will do.--Sabrebd (talk) 00:48, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What insturment(s) does Anderson play?  (missing from article)Acwilson9 (talk) 22:04, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  What insturment(s)?
Talk:Resin dispensing

message: The lemma is "Resin casting", but the article only describes "resin casting system". Resin casting is often made by hand, by mixing resin and hardener manually and pouring it into a mold. 62.80.30.162 (talk) 10:29, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I very much agree. This article is good, but the contents is too specific for the title. Even the bolded text in the lead says "Resin casting system". If there are no objections I plan to move this article to Resin casting system and create an article here that deals more with resin casting in general. There should be enough material in Garage kit and Designer toys to get something stubby started about the hand-casting process. Siawase (talk) 11:34, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: By coincidence I just recently talked to specialists. I am the original author of the article and my native tongue is German. I had chosen "Resin casting as" lemma, but always felt a bit uneasy about the wording. I did not realise, that you started to discuss the name as I, guided by a private discussion, decided to better rename it to "resin dispensing". As you can see, I changed the wording consistently in the whole text. With my change your problems are gone as well, I presume.
--Peter Wöllauer (talk) 10:36, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: After a quick googling it does seem like (apart from wikipedia) "resin dispensing" is more commonly used for the type of automated system this article describes, while "resin casting" is more commonly used for the soft mold hands-on method. Resin despensing system still seems like a better article name to me though, since that is what the article describes, not resin dispensing in a more general sense. Siawase (talk) 10:58, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resin casting (system)? 

message: Yet another process, often used in hand poured castings, is placing the filled mold in a pressure tank which is pumped up with air to at least 60 PSI to eliminate air bubbles. Bizzybody (talk) 05:43, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Pressure casting
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Online travel in australia

message: The Australian travel scene is massively missing content within Wikipedia! It is all biased to an American theme and does nothing for the Australian audience. This is a very topical subject currently particularly with the increase of interest in Low Cost Carriers and Australia finally opening up to the world. Developers are specifically interested in online technologies, what has been used and what is being used with web 2.0 Perthflights 04:39, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Dota Gozen

message: Gozen is a title, not a surname. Tomoe Gozen has the same title. It's kind of like the equivalent of "Lady" or "Dame." All instances of using it should be replaced with "Dota." Using it as a surname is like referring to people like Lord Byron as "Lord" throughout the article instead of "Byron."  ForestAngel (talk) 20:00, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gozen
Template talk:Relevance fallacies

message: Argumentum ad lapidem appears in the template twice, eh. Varlaam (talk) 04:18, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Already fixed. BTW, it was easier to fix it than to comment it. Scarbrow (talk) 08:18, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Argumentum ad lapidem 

message: "Tone policing" is a neologististic term with no substantial academic commentary. It's status as a fallacy is tentative at best and it should be removed.Scyph (talk) 23:07, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi and welcome!  I noted your removal and would like to hear a little more.  The tone policing article does contain two reference citations from two schools, which should satisfy at least the beginnings of academic commentary.  Also, while I understand Brink's misgivings, tone policing isn't the only autological fallacy, is it?  And while that might be considered a "flaw", it doesn't seem to negate the undesirable situation of trying to avoid a person's point of view by focusing upon the tone of their voice, does it?  Paine Ellsworth  put'r there  09:27, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tone policing
Talk:The Owl in Daylight

message: This article is absolutely misleading. It suggest that Dick had clear ideas about what he could have written hadn't he died in March 1982. Well, he didn't. It's true that he suggests plot outlines and ideas in the letters contained in Volume 6, but he did that for other novels before that, and what he actually wrote was always different from the outlines in the letters. Dick did not write chapter schemes, plot outlines, etc. He simply took notes of ideas, concepts, things he found interesting, but without planning a plot; then he suddenly started writing and finished the novel in few weeks. The novel was what he wrote down in a sort of trance, not what he described in his previous letters. Go and read the plot outlines of VALIS: they bear almost no relation to VALIS, and vaguely resemble ALBEMUTH. But vaguely. They talk about another novel, actually, that he imagined but never wrote. All in all what you find in the letters is what he thought was a good viable plot in the moment that he wrote the letter, but he changed his mind so often! So this article should be way more careful in its description of what Owl could have been−and never was, because Dick didn't even start it. He felt sick and tired in autumn 1981, and he was afraid that the effort of writing another novel could kill him. Read those letters in Volume 6 and you'll see!--93.40.63.32 (talk) 16:50, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Inaccurate Article

message: Is there anything anyone can cite at all from any official or even semi-official source (other than imdb.com) about the supposed movie being made? Worloq 04:53, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Movie