lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Template talk:SS organizations

message: *We need a collapse "Hide" button on this template, it is to large. PianoKeys 14:38, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Preserving here by providing this link; my rationale was: "remove entries that are not SS organizations". --K.e.coffman (talk) 03:16, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. ---raid5 (talk) 21:50, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent edit
Template talk:Koryu

message: How about adding a link in the CE boxes to the Japanese timeline and era names? That would make it a little more utilitarian. Whatcha think??
220.26.47.47 04:47, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japanese year numbering and era timeline 

message: I missed the "no stubs" rule when editing...sorry.
Mekugi 11:07, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem - and also, both of those articles looked very close to Start-class to me.  Why don't you check out the assessment guidelines at WP:WPMA/A, make the necessary (probably very minor) improvements, and get them promoted - then they can both go back on the template. Bradford44 15:51, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sorry about the edit 

message: Togakure ryu, and unfortunately many of the other Bujinkan schools, are undocumented in terms of scholastic dates of origin. That is to say, there is no other references anywhere as to the start dates of the schools (or any other documents outside of the Bujinkan). Should these be included in the Navbox Koryu?? Additionally, these seem like stub articles that were upgraded to "starts" in order to put them in the box.
Mekugi (talk) 17:16, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Togakure Ryu 

message: Daito-ryu almost certainly is koryu. It is commonly accepted in Japan that Takeda Sokaku could not have invented Daito-ryu syllabus by himself in such a short time. Daito-ryu is a member of the Nihon Kobudo Kyokai and the Nihon Kobudo Shinkokai, the two largest and most important organizations in Japan for koryu martial arts. Daito-ryu's status as a koryu is unquestioned in Japan and by the largest koryu organizations there. It should be in the box.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Drosera99 (talk • contribs) 02:41, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no doubt in my mind that the art taught by the school known as Daito-ryu predates the Meiji era.  However, there is a difference between the age of the art and the age of the school.  There presently is no evidence that the school was founded prior to the Meiji era.  If we based the age of a ryu off of the age of the technical syllabus, all of the schools listed would be substantially older than they are listed as.  However, this template deals exclusively with the age of each discrete organization, which for Daito-ryu cannot be substantiated as being any older than the late 19th century.  If you can direct me to a reliable secondary reference that states otherwise, please do so. Bradford44 (talk) 14:09, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Daito-ryu 

message: Don't you think that this ryuha is need to be in the 19th century section? I think it is strange to find through the Itto-ryu article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tsubaki Sanjuro (talk • contribs) 12:17, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see the guidelines for adding articles to the template.  As soon as that article is has some references and is Start-class or better, it most certainly should be added to the template. Bradford44 (talk) 14:12, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Itto Shoden Muto-ryu
Talk:Domestic violence during pregnancy

message: I propose that this article be upmerged with the main Domestic violence article. In my opinion, there was no need to spinout content. There wasn't even a mention of DV during pregnancy in the main article. We should create a section at DV on this topic, and if we ever get to the point where we need to spin out content, decide on the talk:Domestic violence page, what content requires its own article. This article has very little prose and is just a series of lists. It is weak as a stand alone article, and isn't very encyclopedic. I believe that it would work fine as a section of the DV article.-Andrew c 15:09, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm okay with a merge. --Aude (talk) 20:24, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal
Talk:Yusul

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  VernoWhitney (talk) 04:33, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Tourism in Jordan

message: I'm not sure who originally said this-- but I agree. I think we should start working on a rewrite here. Eshcorp 15:23, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sounds like an advertisement

message: I think the article has already some good, but brief, information. 2 suggestions: use the tourism gram outline (see below), and check the source links (a couple of them are broken). Good luck! :)
1. Map of country's location
2. Background
* Land and Climate
* History
3. THE PEOPLE:
* Population
* Government
* Economy
* Language
* Religion
* Food/Diet
* Customs/Courtesies
* Holidays
4. TOURISM:
* Visa/Entry Requirements
* Currency/ Currency Conversion (country currency converted in USD, Canadian Dollars, Euros, Pounds, and Yens)
* Key Tourism Development
* Level of Tourism Development (e.g. hotels, infrastructure)
* Transportation Options
* Attractions
* * "Must See" Attractions
* * Secondary Attractions
* * Weather/Climate Concerns
* Safety/Security Concerns (e.g. crime, health)
* Environmental Concerns (e.g. air quality)
* Socio-cultural Concerns (i.e. cultural norms)
* Emergency Contacts
Czuni6 (talk) 02:59, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer Review: Edit Suggestions
Talk:Udayana

message: Manjurh 13:36, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The content above should be converted into a separate Wikipedia article Udayana (king). noychoH (talk) 22:29, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: King Udayana

message: The three pages: Udayanacarya, Udayanacharya and the present one, Udayana should be merged into one page as they deal with the same Indian Nyaya philosopher, named Udayana, and called Udayanācārya or "Master Udayana".
noychoH (talk) 22:29, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Merged content from Udayanacarya and redirected it and talk page. I stopped short of doing the merge on Udayanacharya since I think that content will need to be integrated more thoroughly into this article and I don't feel I have the expertise to do so. BrideOfKripkenstein (talk) 15:48, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal
Talk:1994 Football League Cup final

message: Why is Houghton down as a defender, always thought he was a midfielder. JimmyMac82 14:32, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's obvious - for the same reason that Cox is listed as a GK and McClair as a MF! I'll change 'em.  slυмgυм [ ←→ ] 17:32, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ray Houghton

message: The Road to Wembley section doesn't make sense... Man U seem to play an extra round. Villa go straight from Round 4 to the Quarter-Finals while Man U go from the Fifth Round to the Quarter-Finals. I'm pretty sure that in the League Cup the Fifth Round IS the quarter-final. Also, clubs weren't byed through to the Third Round when in Europe back then (both clubs were in Europe that season). Was Man U v Stoke actually a second round, second leg game and if so could someone please add the first leg score and correct the other rounds accordingly? Villafancd (talk) 21:38, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. – PeeJay 23:15, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  '''The Road to Wembley''' 
Talk:List of people educated at Christ's Hospital

message: I've redirected Laurence Sinclair to Laurence Frank Sinclair as I assume there aren't two different Air Vice Marshals with the same name who've won the GC.  However, that page says he attended another school.  Can someone clarify?  Rojomoke (talk) 09:20, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Laurence Sinclair 

message: David Norgrove is now Sir David. Also, to describe him as a 'businessman' is slightly misleading, as much (most?) of his life has been spent in the public service.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:4DD1:EB12:0:E8E4:E7A0:3401:ED90 (talk) 09:46, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  David Norgrove
Talk:Bartonella rochalimae/Silliness

message: :True enough... personally, I'm a Bartonella denialist reappraiser. I think the scientific community is ignoring and suppressing the clear evidence that Afipia felis is responsible for cat-scratch. Don't even get me started on Koch's postulates... MastCell Talk 00:26, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hah! I will sue you in a court of law in Trenton, New South Wales.... - Nunh-huh 01:21, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nunh-huh, I know it was a joke, but it's probably best not to threaten legal action on Wikipedia :-P. See WP:LEGAL. Nishkid64 (talk) 01:23, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You know, I wondered when I wrote it if someone would deliberately misconstrue it as a legal threat. It's a bizarre misreading that would not even occur to the person to whom the remark was addressed. Nishkid64, that was not a legal threat, as you acknowledge, so please don't suggest it is. I'm familiar with the rules here, and I really don't need your cautions.  - Nunh-huh 02:55, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, now I feel bad. Sorry, it was a silly joke, and now I've caused drama. I should have followed my own advice from WP:SARCASM... let's move on. MastCell Talk 03:32, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: We MUST use Smileys® when engaging in humorous discussion. Unorthodox capitalization and judicious use of evil laughter are also encouraged. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 03:44, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Think of it as a mellow drama. :) - Nunh-huh 03:45, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nunh-huh, I am just commenting on what it is. I know you said it jokingly, but even joke legal threats are a no-no on Wikipedia. People can easily make the mistake of taking your statement out of context, and that would definitely be problematic. Nishkid64 (talk) 16:20, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have to agree with Nishkid here. It's my experience that many people have some difficulty following threads. More importantly, what may seem obvious to the writer is not necessarily so obvious to the reader. Bear in mind that many wikipedian editors don't have an excellent understanding of English so implied sarcasm may easily be lost. At the very least, as others have mention one should use smileys and the like to minimise the possibility of confusion Nil Einne 06:00, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If people are having trouble following threads, and for some reason feel it is important that they follow threads which have no relevancy to them, they can ask to have them explained. This is especially true of those who "don't have an excellent understanding of English" yet feel it important to comment on threads they don't understand. - Nunh-huh 05:29, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

text: As MastCell said a few edits ago, let's move on. This has strayed off-topic long enough, everyone involved in this discussion has been around a fair time, and this is hardly productive. Enough is enough. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 15:47, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Destilando Amor

message: This is the most-watched telenovela in the USA and the article looks like a small child wrote it.  Compare Dame Chocolate, Zorro: La Espada y la Rosa‎, and El Cuerpo del Deseo. Can someone fix this thing?  Mosquera 11:32, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Let's clean this up!

message: In the first place, whoever wrote the thing above is kind of wrong. I am a 14 year old boy, and yes, I was the first one to do this article, cast list and most of the beginning of the story. And can someone explain why the article needs fixing??
: More reasons why Wikipedia has sometimes problems, 14 year old kids writing...72.200.29.102 03:07, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't worry about it.  I will try to tidy things yo.  Mosquera 05:53, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Take it back!

message: Shouldn't the title translation be Distilling Love? I mean the shows back drop is a tequila plantation, but I understand essentially distilling is concentrating to get the "essence." Regardless "Distilling Love" is what the title is in English. I'm not sure if "Essence of Love" is an official title translation but if it's not maybe we should replace it with "Distilling Love" instead. Pinkpineapple 03:03, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Essence of Love? 

message: THIS NEEDS EXPANDING PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! PLEASE SOMEONE EXPAND IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.127.236.147 (talk) 01:04, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  expanding 

message: It's showing on mainland Chinese television (CCTV-8), dubbed into Mandarin. m.e. (talk) 15:36, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chinese television
Talk:Estonian Self-Administration

message: Kids, please stop and try to reach a compromise. The name Estonian Self-Administration is at least correct translation of Eesti Omavalitsus (haven't had a chance to check sources), but it is as clear, that it was a puppet government without any real power. So, compromise - name it Estonian Self-Administration, but make it clear it was a puppet of Nazis. DLX 15:58, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Unacceptable.  Estonian Self-Administration is a name crying for context.  In context of the Nazi Germany's usage, this context was the context.  We can't, however, expect Wikipedians to accept the Nazi context; thus, this aspect needs to be made explicit in the title.  I can propose Estonian Self-Administration (Nazi puppet government), Nazi-Era Estonian Self-Administration or perhaps Self-Administration of Estonia during Nazi Occupation.  However, given that this particular puppet was fairly powerless and thus, of limited significance, I recommend discussing the whole affair in the article of Occupation of Estonia by Nazi Germany. Digwuren 17:37, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Puppet government is about the only thing the article says right now. I do not know how it could be more pro- puppet-POV. As for the name, this is what is used by the Estonian International Commission for the Investigation of Crimes Against Humanity. -- Petri Krohn 19:30, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit warring
Talk:Sam Grey

message: Sam Grey is an actress currently appearing in BBC drama Casualty as receptionist Alice Chantrey and is watched weekly by up to 9 million people. She's also modelled for big names such as Vogue, Burberry and Virgin Mobile.
Rheady 16:03, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Talk:Sam Grey
Talk:Meeting and convention planner

message: I've removed the following external links from this article per WP:EL and WP:NOT. Please discuss external links here before adding to this article. --Busy Stubber 18:00, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: External links

message: If the following are used as sources for text in this article, please link them to the text using inline citations for verification. Please do not create reading lists without discussing it on the talk page -- see WP:NOT. These books, magazines and websites could be used as sources for information in the article. This article is about the occupation of planning meetings and conventions. Please add cited information on the role and responsiblities of a meeting and convention planner. Thank you! --Busy Stubber 18:29, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Literature list
Talk:Siem Reap

message: A large portion of this article is a copyright violation copied from palmvillage.com which is a hotel site fer chrissakes  Hardly an authoritative site on Siem Reap town. I'll give it a day or two for courtesy and then it gets nuked. Paxse 16:15, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: old comments from 2007

message: The Coordinates on Infobox Settlement template of this article(13°N 21°E) seem to be wrong. Can any body check it? Best Regards. --Kiensvay | Kiensvay(Talk on kmwiki) 08:52, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request! 

message: I've been told by a Cambodian that "Siem Reap" means "siamese law". What's about?
I've been only thriough Takéo Province close to the Vietnamese border of An Giang, studying the Khmer Krom.
Takima (talk) 18:47, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No, the article is correct. It means 'Thailand the defeated' or thereabouts. Sean.hoyland - talk 02:38, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  meaning? 

message: Once again the guidebooks are being plagiarised for content - this time Nick Ray's old Lonely Planet article - anybody else feel like nuking it this time? Takers? --Paxse (talk) 17:02, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violation 

message: I personally think that this article is great, knowledgable and informative. I would say Siem Reap have many things to talk and describe about. An article could not meantion what it's all about. By Angkor Wat  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amoooorlin (talk • contribs) 02:26, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  info 

message: The following coordinate fixes are needed for
—203.144.73.170 (talk) 00:37, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: You haven't said what you think is wrong with the coordinates in the article, and they appear to be correct. If you still think that there is an error, you'll need to supply a clear explanation of what it is. Deor (talk) 17:25, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinates 

message: Siem Reap city 117.20.115.194 (talk) 15:35, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Siem Reap city 

message: Some of the information under 'attractions', 'notable sites near Siem Reap', 'local specialties' and 'transportation' read to me like an advertisment for tourism, especially the section detailing where to buy brandy in 'local specialties', and the instructions for how to get between Bangkok and Siem Reap in 'transportation'. Aloneonthisearth (talk) 00:32, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reads like an advert
Talk:Young Centaur

message: These are the Furietti Centaurs: dividing them into two articles, under obscure names has no defensible rationale. They were conceived as a pair, perhaps both ridden by cupids and illustrating the pleasures and frustrations of love, in youth and in maturity. How can they be considered separately? --Wetman 16:21, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: See response on Talk:Old Centaur. Neddyseagoon - talk 16:50, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Clockwork Orange (plot)

message: One would have expected this article to begin with a disambiguation sentence typically of the form "This article is about the such-and-such. For the whatnot of the same name, see blah blah blah". The title of this article makes it sound like the movie or novel "A Clockwork Orange" has a plot of such significance that the plot alone deserves its own article. How about "Clockwork Orange (British right-winger conspiracy)" or something like that?2604:2000:C682:2D00:4983:DD1:23A9:990 (talk) 21:29, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguration please =
Talk:Old Centaur

message: These are the Furietti Centaurs: dividing them into two articles, under obscure names has no defensible rationale. They were conceived as a pair, perhaps both ridden by cupids and illustrating the pleasures and frustrations of love, in youth and in maturity. How can they be considered separately? --Wetman 16:21, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, the Louvre one is only highly likely to have once had a (now-lost) pair, not certain, but I take your point and will instigate a merger, and then can you add something about Furietti?  I hadn't heard of them til now, and whenever they're referred to separately in UK museums (eg the label for the casts of them at the Courtauld) or academe, "Old Centaur" and "Young Centaur" are the commonly accepted titles, nothing obscure about it.  Neddyseagoon - talk 16:34, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Shepard, Alberta

message: Shepard has been officially annexed by Calgary. I'm in the process now of converting the article to conform with other Calgary neighbourhood articles. 68.146.47.196 21:02, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Converting to neighbourhood article

message: I have moved this article from "Shepard, Alberta" to "Shepard, Calgary" to reflect the fact it is now part of Calgary and to be consistent with the other neighbourhood articles on Calgary. Also, since none of the neighborhood articles belong to the Alberta WikiProject, in order to be consistent I've removed this article from that project. If anyone has a strong objection to my doing so, Please feel free to put it back. 23skidoo 20:35, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article move, removal from Alberta Wikiproject

message: It appears the City of Calgary does not officially recognize the former Hamlet of Shepard as an official neighbourhood (or community, which is the term Calgary uses in place of neighbourhood).  A listing of all official communities is located here within the Community Legend section on pages 15-20.  A key word search for Shepard results in two hits within this section – East Shepard Industrial and Shepard Industrial.  There are no hits for Shepard on its own.  Therefore, although annexed by Calgary, Shepard is not an official neighbourhood according to the City of Calgary.  This article needs to be fixed as a result.  If the article is revised such that it is only about the former hamlet, then a potential move back to Shepard, Alberta should be discussed. Hwy43 (talk) 18:24, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: As Calgary still does not yet recognize Shepard as its own neighbourhood, I think it is time to revert the previously undiscussed move and return it to Shepard, Alberta. Hwy43 (talk) 05:29, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: No, Calgary still doesn't recognize it, another census, and Sherpard is only mentioned as an industrial area. 117Avenue (talk) 07:10, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Did you mean to write "Yes, Calgary still doesn't recognize it..."? With the current "No...", the tone of the above seems to conflict with the edit summaries indicating a yes to the move. Please confirm a yes or no to the move. Thanks, Hwy43 (talk) 09:41, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I chose the negative because Calgary doesn't recognize it. The tone is lost in the writing. I am agreeing to move. 117Avenue (talk) 03:15, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. I'll request a move back over the redirect via WP:RM/TR. Hwy43 (talk) 05:24, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not officially a neighbourhood