lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:STS-26

message: In section 2, Mission Summary, we state that "The orbiter sustained only minor Thermal Protection System tile damage..." (2nd paragraph).  In section 2.3 Damage to Thermal Protection, we say that "Discovery suffered severe damage to its thermal protection tiles in the underwing area. Post-flight analysis showed that the impact of a 12-inch long piece of cork insulation during ascent was the culprit. The origin of the debris was the forward field joint on the right-hand SRB. The damage was such that, during re-entry, the thermal protection tile eroded almost completely.[2] A similar chain of events ultimately led to the loss of Columbia fifteen years later."
These two claims are in conflict with one another, but I lack the expertise to figure out which one is right. Banality (talk) 04:49, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistency - thermal protection system 

message: The article describes STS-26 as "the first mission with bailout capacity since STS-4" but says nothing more about it. On STS-4 the crew had ejection seats, which as far as I know were only fitted to Columbia. How did STS-26's baily capacity work, and how was it different from the system used post-STS4 / pre-STS-26? -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 13:07, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bailout
Talk:STS-29

message: Yes, this was the flight with supposed alien contact. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mYtHwvyCST4 at 7:53 on the video, Discovery says, "we still have the alien space craft under observance". Make of it what you will. DRAC250 (talk) 12:43, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The material on the "alien space craft" has been removed as it was unsourced.  This YouTube video doesn't impress me as a reliable source.  All the instances I could find of this were either speculative UFO websites or simply the 1 transmission taken out of context.  Claims that CAPCOM's response was to switch to another frequency are not backed up by any of the audio recordings I've heard.  Even if the quote is accurate it is likely explained by the fact that astronauts are well known to joke around with their fellow astronauts in the CAPCOM role.  Until a reliable source (newspaper, magazine, book, etc) is found mentioning this transmission, it shouldn't be restored to the article.--RadioFan (talk) 13:05, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Alien Spacecraft

message: Any thoughts on the inclusion of this link: https://www.flickr.com/photos/nasamarshall/3953790458/in/photostream/lightbox/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.111.77.195 (talk) 05:30, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tank re-entry video 

message: These should be added to the article, but it probably won't be anything groundbreaking. Definitely notable though. Here's a start:
* https://web.archive.org/web/20220313220247/http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/sun_darkness.html
SpacePod9 (talk) 12:20, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Effects of March 1989 Solar Storm on Discovery
Talk:Julia

message: JULIA could also be... "Jicamarca Unattended Long-term Investigations of the Ionosphere and Atmosphere"
REF = http://cedarweb.hao.ucar.edu/wiki/index.php/Instruments:jul  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.246.132.26 (talk) 16:47, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Scientific Installation

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved per request.  Favonian (talk) 16:08, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 18 March 2023 

message: https://wikinav.toolforge.org/?language=en&title=Julia indicates that in April '23, there were 2.1k incoming views, and outgoing 415 for programming language, 289 given name, 225 '22 TV series, 129 '68 TV series, 113 '77 film, etc, up to 14 destinations with 10+ clickstreams.
https://pageviews.wmcloud.org/massviews/?platform=all-access&agent=user&source=wikilinks&start=2023-04-01&end=2023-04-30&sort=views&direction=1&view=list&target=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julia (likewise April '23) shows programming language and '22 TV series at the top, but then the list substantially diverges from the other one.
One could probably make a graph to show the differences in correlation between page views and clickstream... anyone? --Joy (talk) 18:54, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  post-move
Talk:José S. Landaverde

message: *
*
* - self-published/not reliable, but possibly useful
*
*
*
*
*
--Cheeser1 (talk) 04:49, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible references to integrate into article
File talk:1984 Olympic games countries.PNG

message: It was china's first Olympics right? In that case shouldn't it be colored in blue? Leotolstoy (talk) 04:52, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, People's Republic of China made its first Olympics back in 1984. Can you please change it to blue. Thank You. --ApprenticeFan (talk) 13:54, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: China

message: This is the first Olympics for the United Arab Emirates the country should be in blue. Waseem7 (talk) 02:09, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: United Arab Emirates
Talk:Harry Shorstein

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:25, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: I must disagree with the changes made by User:Cuchullain. As the section reads now, there is nothing notable. This editor states he is "Toning down tangentially-related Brenton Butler material", when in fact, he removed the points that were notable. The fact that "Butler was acquitted by the jury in less than an hour." and "The jury also issued a statement that was critical of the arrest and prosecution." are significant. Cuchullain's text, "the State Attorney's office and JSO took the unusual step of apologizing to him" is an attempt to gloss over the fact that "Shorstein and Sheriff Nat Glover personally apologized to Brenton Butler and his family". Mgreason (talk) 02:09, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't appreciate your tone, Mgreason. The fact is that the Butler case is only tangentially related to Harry Shorstein and doesn't belong in his biography. His only connection to it is that it was one of many murder cases prosecuted while he was State Attorney, he did not prosecute it himself as far as I know (at least none of the sources you provided indicate that he did). Even if he did, all the details about the investigation and the jury's finding belong at the article for on the case, they do certainly do not need to be replicated at all the articles that mention the case (essentially the same text was inserted into the Nat Glover article). The wording of the material was also thoroughly slanted, something forbidden by NPOV and especially BLP. Finally, the source did not indicate that Shorstein and Glover personally apologized to Butler, it only says that their offices did. An encyclopedia article should not consist of random news items that mention the subject in some way.--Cúchullain t/c 18:21, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brenton Butler section
Category talk:Wikipedia external links cleanup

message: What does it mean that an article is in this category?  Does it mean there are too many external links?  That some external links are dead?  That some are linked to directly instead of in a reference tag?
Jarich (talk) 05:02, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: All of the above, as far as I can see. It's basically flagging that there's something wrong with the External links section that needs the attention of an editor for whatever reason. Greggers (t • c) 20:07, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does this category mean?
Talk:Opoutere

message: Ōpoutere would be correct 161.29.156.11 (talk) 23:40, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It would be, but we only use macrons in geographical titles where that's the official nameo, and there is no official name for Ōpoutere.-gadfium 23:46, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  macrons
Category talk:Thought

message: How do we notice our 'Thoughts?' 
If we desire to notice our thoughts, the first step is to be aware of that we have thoughts. The next step is writing down our thought of the moment. Identify the emotional, psychological and physical effect of the thought. We might want to follow through in our thought where this thought is leading us, the thoughts will actually give us detailed messages, ask our thoughts, “What are you trying to tell me?” They’ll happily give us additional information to help us decode their meanings. We have noticed our thought and allow it stay, while keeping an objective distance from it. The thing to remember is that we cannot deal with these thoughts on their own level; we cannot overcome thoughts by more thoughts. Our thoughts under the gaze of concentration and observation reveal its own nature; by carefully observing, objectively, we see how thoughts have come into existence, those who are aware of their thoughts become skilled at reading the meaning of what we are getting caught up in. Continue working on observing our thoughts, soon is going to be evident to us our thoughts penetrate daily and that produces this feeling, can it ever end. Unless we acknowledge the existence of thoughts, and understand the enormous significance of it, to end thoughts completely is the most difficult thing to do, before we can go into the question of ending thoughts, we must understand what thought is.
   
===== What is Thought? =====
 
What we call thought is the result of thinking. Our thought often communicate messages to us, they do these in two ways first they whisper in our ear so that we are hearing it, second way in which the thought show us is by physically arranging for us to feel it, this skillful communication is thought and the feeling from effect of the thought should be faced. When we see the first sign of thought otherwise feeling that tend to drag us down, instead of letting feeling have their way, we must try to notice our thought. Our feeling can be stopped through the method of observation and recognition of our thoughts.   
gita  (talk) 03:40, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is Thought? 

message: What we call thought is the result of thinking. Our thought often communicate messages to us, they do these in two ways first they whisper in our ear so that we are hearing it, second way in which the thought show us is by physically arranging for us to feel it, this skillful communication is thought and the feeling from effect of the thought should be faced. When we see the first sign of thought otherwise feeling that tend to drag us down, instead of letting feeling have their way, we must try to notice our thought. Our feeling can be stopped through the method of observation and recognition of our thoughts.   
gita  (talk) 03:40, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is Thought? 

message: Because they are already under the tought's treeZipodu (talk) 17:01, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  I remove cognitive science and mental processes categories
Talk:Concordat of 2002

message: "...and devolves authority over all religious matters to it, including matters outside the Church."
Can someone explain what this means?  Does the Church have some sort of legal authority over non-believers? --Jfruh (talk) 20:12, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "outside the church" 
Talk:List of compositions by Charles Ives

message: In no other composer's list of compositions is there such an obvious attempt at discrediting their work. This introduction goes even further to sow doubt and even questions Ives honesty. I attempted to reword this intro keeping the spirit by noting the difficulty in dating his works while omitting speculation and jealousy expressed by the young Elliot Carter (1939) who had had the privilege of visiting Ives at his home. My rewording was deleted and only served to strengthen someone's resolve as they, whomever it was, apparently feels obligated or takes joy in emphasizing the difficulties in chronologically listing the compositions of Ives. This type of information, perhaps worthy of consideration, belongs on the Charles Ives main page, not here or at least not represented in this way. In general, Charles Ives has received less recognition than deserved for his pioneering work. I wish James Sinclair would write this introduction.  Xno007 (talk) 16:31, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Promoting Misleading Information
Talk:WQCD (AM)

message: Per the WP:Disambig page, "If only a primary topic and one other topic require disambiguation, then disambiguation links are sufficient, and a disambiguation page is unnecessary." Since the radio station call letters are the primary identification and the acronym for a defunct railway system is a secondary identification, a hat note is sufficient and requires no more steps than would a disambiguation page for people seeking the War Department Light Railways. - Dravecky (talk) 08:44, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rationale for deletion of disambiguation page
Talk:Church of Christ (Brewsterite)

message: Are any of these early LDS denominations Church of Christ Rigdonite, Godbeite, Parrishite, etc. related to the Churches of Christ?  I attended a Church of Christ in SC one time and found some amazing similarities to the LDS views regarding Apostacy.  I heard they were related, but does anyone have more conclusive evidence, or is it just circumstantial in relation to the Restoration Movement?
Reds0xfan (talk) 06:06, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sidney Rigdon was a Campbellite minister before he converted to Mormonism, I think. Apart from that I don't think there is any direct connection, apart from arising in America around the same period of time. Snocrates 07:10, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:1983 Lucanamarca massacre

message: The following was added to the page; i'm moving it here as it's not part of the article, but may have some meaning or purpose: "just i want to add, a note that also Olegario Curitomai Father and Mother was killed by the ronderos of Lucanamarca".  Cheers, LindsayHello 03:49, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personal additions 
Talk:TCI

message: There's a line for Total Comfort Insulation that appears to be more of an advertisement than a reference to another article.  I had removed it previously, along with some realphebetizine, but the person who put it there originally reverted the whole change.  I realphabetized the list but kept the line in, although it really does not belong unless there's an article entitled "Total Comfort Insulation" here in Wikipedia that it can refer to -- without such an article, and just a reference to someone's name, it looks like advertising, which I believe is prohibited.  I'm not going to start a revert war -- someone else can delete it if appropriate.GreatScott (talk) 06:18, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Advertising
Talk:Minimates

message: The Minimates with C3 feet (feet with holes in the bottom), are mostly compatible with LEGO, MegaBloks and C3 building blocks. However C3 feet are a relatively new feature, and do not appear on the the older versions of Minimates (like the 3-inch figures and the earlier Marvel waves).203.87.224.222 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment was added at 08:07, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  are they compatible with LEGO building blocks?

message: The Minimate article is becoming awfully long just because of the lists. Perhaps it's high time the main Minimates article focused on the history of the line itself with just brief discussion of the licenses involved, and the released-items lists split off into another article entirely?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Axilog14 (talk • contribs) 02:23, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I completely agree with you. I am, however, to busy on Wikipedia, and too lazy, to help you out. Spongefrog, (talk to me, or else) 19:32, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

text: I think the easiest thing to do would be to seperate the Marvel Minimates to their own page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.161.82.172 (talk) 14:54, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate page for the Minimate lines? 

message: Art Asylum appears to be notable primarily for creating Minimates, and otherwise fails WP:NCORP. Pburka (talk) 13:38, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Art Asylum]] 
Talk:Ngaju language

message: I'm uncertain if these should be added to the article itself. I put them here so the editors can at least find them. Some more further reading material and/or additional more in-depth information and references would be a nice addition to the article though.
Sample texts:
* https://giusbuyuttigoi.blogspot.com/2012/10/uder-dengan-bakei.html
Dictionary-like sources:
* https://www.kapuas.info/2010/07/kamus-dayak-ngaju-indonesia.html
* https://maltuskatingan.blogspot.com/2014/12/kamus-bahasa-dayak.html
* https://id.wiktionary.org/wiki/Lampiran:Kamus_bahasa_Indonesia_%E2%80%93_bahasa_Bakumpai
* https://abvd.shh.mpg.de/austronesian/classification.php?node=Austronesian,%20Malayo-Polynesian,%20Greater%20Barito,%20West,%20South,
Linguistic data:
* Glottolog: https://glottolog.org/resource/languoid/id/ngaj1237 (Glottolog is part of a larger collection of datasets: https://clld.org/datasets.html)
* Etymological wordlist: https://www.trussel2.com/ACD/acd-l_n.htm#Ngaju_Dayak
* Numbers in Austronesian languages: https://www.zompist.com/anes.htm  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tom9358 (talk • contribs) 12:03, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some sources
Talk:Washington State Democratic Party

message: --The Sharon Smith link under the Vice Chair goes to a page on a Socialist/feminist with no reference to the Democratic party, the State of Washington or her position in the party.  Is this the same person? RCPayne (talk) 23:18, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: A disambiguation page has been created for the numerous Sharon Smiths.  — CactusWriter | needles 09:55, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong link
Talk:Arthur Bambridge

message: I cannot find any trace of Arthur Bambridge in the lists of Royal Academicians, neither RA nor ARA. I am therefore tagging for fact. Man vyi (talk) 18:11, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've gone back to my original sources and I can't find this cited anywhere, so I have removed it from the article and removed Bambridge from the Royal Academicians category.  If I should find that the original article was correct, I ill re-instate this content, duly cited.   Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 19:34, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! Man vyi (talk) 06:32, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Royal Academy 
Talk:Bill Orwig

message: Any information on whether Bill Orwig was related to 1957 Michigan Wolverines football captain Jim Orwig from Toledo?http://bentley.umich.edu/athdept/football/fbcapt/1957capt.htm Cbl62 (talk) 06:39, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Jim Orwig
Talk:High Performance Storage System

message: I'd like to propose that the redirect "HPSS", which currently links to Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone, to this page instead.  Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone has other shorthand redirects (HP1).  HPSS has been the name of this product since its inception more than 15 years ago.  Finally, appealing to correctness from popularity, a quick Google search of "HPSS" reveals that 8 of the first 10 entries are information about this entry. This acronym is the common name of the product in both verbal and written language, just as IBM is the name of common name of the company in both written and spoken language.  - Michael.meseke (talk) 06:42, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It is now a disambiguation page, which makes sense to me. As per the "common name" guidelines, I would be willing to wager that naming Harry Potter is more common the entire world than this very specialized technology. W Nowicki (talk) 23:18, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Acronym

message: Of promotional web site http://www.hpss-collaboration.org/hpss_collaboration.shtml
Not good. W Nowicki (talk) 23:18, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Cut-n-paste?
Talk:Ranger 3

message: In the meantime - Has it impacted anywhere? Disintegrated during atmospheric reentry? Is it still orbiting the sun? (NASA's "HORIZONS" Database seems to have no objects named "ranger"...) --BjKa (talk) 10:49, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: For those who are curious, it is still in a heliocentric orbit according to NSSDCA. No specifics about the parameters are given.--Cincotta1 (talk) 02:13, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where is it now? 

message: Hi there! I am busy translating the article into Afrikaans and found that the article refers to a hig gain antenna, a omnidirectional antenna, a turnstile antenna and a TM antenna. Were there four antennas on the craft or did the auther get his facts wrong? Please advice! Regards! Oesjaar (talk) 14:33, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The antenna issue...
Talk:Ranger 4

message: Please see my question and comments at the Science RefDesk. —Mathew5000 (talk) 14:55, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I elected to insert NASA's coordinates. I'll leave it to someone else to accurately convert them in North/East format, if it seems worthwhile. Cmholm (talk) 08:16, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinates of Ranger 4 crash site
Talk:Duty of care (business associations)

message: Seems a little NPOV-shy. I think the elements of the argument are related to the article, but written pretty poorly.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Manys (talk • contribs) 18:08, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Criticisms Section

message: — Assignment last updated by Skkblaw (talk) 20:14, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Undergraduate Law and Ethics
Talk:Ranger 7

message: The article describes the problem--LoX and fuel venting, combined with a flimsy cover over the umbilical connection.  But it doesn't say what the fix was (apparently it was not to do s.t. other than vent at booster separation, because that is said to have been observed. Mcswell (talk) 02:19, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: What was the fix?
Talk:Ranger 9

message: Noticed an IP user changed the spelling of the material used to construct the spacecraft.  My first thought was to revert without mercy, but then I started thinking:
Aluminium is the IUPAC spelling, and it's the one most of the world uses, and it's how the article on the metal is spelled.  On the other hand, it was a US spacecraft, so perhaps the US spelling should apply within the article. Almostfm (talk) 04:54, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Alumin(i)um