Talk:Inverse kinematics

message: This page was vandalized with the use of weasel words but is fixed.
===IK unimportant due to mocap?===
Not sure the line saying IK has any less importance due to Motion capture use has any merit at all. Ask any animator or technician for game development and using mocap as a *base* for animation is far, far more common than using raw mocap for animation data. IK is in heavy use to make characters' feet line up with terrain, hands line up with usable objects etc. The line adds nothing to the article, and if anything is disinformative and lacks perspective. Up for someone proving me wrong, but i'm removing it for now.--Decept404 14:06, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism

message: Not sure the line saying IK has any less importance due to Motion capture use has any merit at all. Ask any animator or technician for game development and using mocap as a *base* for animation is far, far more common than using raw mocap for animation data. IK is in heavy use to make characters' feet line up with terrain, hands line up with usable objects etc. The line adds nothing to the article, and if anything is disinformative and lacks perspective. Up for someone proving me wrong, but i'm removing it for now.--Decept404 14:06, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: IK unimportant due to mocap?

message: This article and Inverse kinematic animation share a number of redundant facts, and I think they're close enough in subject that they needn't be split into two separate articles.Chaos95 07:32, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge I'm surprised there are two articles on the same subject. — Frecklefσσt | Talk 11:59, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Proposal 

message: Inverse kinematics is important to robot path planning and control. Prof McCarthy (talk) 07:37, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I revised the section Robotics and 3D animation and changed its name to Inverse kinematics and 3D animation.  I commented out the original version in case anyone is concerned that I left out important material. Prof McCarthy (talk) 18:35, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revisions to article 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Inverse kinematics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/60uCFHqC2?url=http://freespace.virgin.net/hugo.elias/models/m_ik2.htm to http://freespace.virgin.net/hugo.elias/models/m_ik2.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:15, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I don't know if this problem came after the layout update or it was like this earlier, but the 'overview' section has a very large image template which makes a good portion of the first paragraph very unreadable. There are about two words per line approximately. I highly recommend a visual change, maybe use a lower dimension image or move it to some another heading, idk. Just do it! عبدالرحمن بن ركن الدين (talk) 02:48, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  This needs a visual upgrade.