lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Craigievar Castle

message: was craigevar built over an older structure? Anlace 20:37, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: i know this part. i mean over a really older structure. eg 13th to 14th century. cheers. Anlace 12:35, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There was a news report about this recently (January 2010), about the remains of an older structure being visible in the masonry when the 1970s harling was removed. I think the date mentioned was 15th century - but whatever the date was, the current text is inaccurate in suggesting that the castle is just early 17th century. It is only its final form that dates from the early 17th century. This is important because the form of Craigeivar castle is often presented as having come from reasons of vanity: the Forbes family perceiving there to be status gained from living in a castle-like structure. But the evidence now exists that a "real" castle (from an age when castles still performed a defensive function) lies at the core of Craigievar. Meowy 17:23, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

message: I have removed this article from :Category:Reportedly haunted locations in Scotland as the article appears to make no mention of ghosts or other paranormal activity associated with Craigievar Castle. If any reliable sources mention reports/legends of hauntings or similar activity being recorded and indicate that this is a significant part of the Castle's story, then obviously this could perhaps be added to the article with citations and the article put back in the category. However, as it stands there does not seem to be good reasons for the article being in the category. Dunarc (talk) 19:28, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Haunted category
Talk:San Cristóbal de las Casas

message: The article in spanish has been updated notabilly. Who will traduce it?
: I started, but there is a lot! Delve in everyone. ¡Todos, ayuden! A1437053 07:06, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Translation from Spanish Needed

message: I've removed the following statement from the history section, which seems debatable:
Scholars believe that the Maya initially migrated from the lowlands and settled in the highlands only after the collapse of the "Classic" Maya civilization.
Linguistic reconstructions at least rather have it the other way around, ie Proto-Mayan(s) dispersing from the Chiapan-Guatemalan highland regions into the lowlands. If anyone has suitable refs to the contrary, it can be modified appropriately.--cjllw | TALK 08:32, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: The former title is fine, because there is no other city with the same name, so no need to disambiguate them.  Unless there is a specific conflict with an established style guideline for similar articles (maybe a Mexican cities wikiproject or similar would establish such a guideline?), I don't see any reason to move it to a "city, state" title.  See WP:NAME:CITY for clarification: as explained, “The general rule is to name an article about a city or town with a name that does not conflict with any other town or concept as city name.”  --jacobolus (t) 17:31, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  keeping title "San Cristóbal de las Casas" instead of "San Cristóbal, Chiapas" 

message: The two external links, one was the official site was a dead link.  The other was disabled  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.85.162.199 (talk) 19:00, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed Two External Links 

message: This external link has been added numerous times.  It is almost completely devoid of useful information, its only purpose seems to be to promote three low-end hostels.
Horstvonludwig (talk) 16:46, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  aboutsancristobal.com 

message: The Mexconnect source seems to be very unprofessionally written and I think some of the information it gives may be questionable. What do you think? 69.235.201.176 (talk) 13:14, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  It is a published newsletter with a issn number.Thelmadatter (talk) 21:32, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mexconnect =
Talk:The Grey Zone

message: I have read about a Sondercommando revolt at Aushwitz.  In the film the Grey Zone, at the end all surviving members of the revolt were shown being shot.  I  what I read, it said they were killed by the SS using Flame Throwers. What is correct?
D.V. Wilcox
171 Poinsett Dr.
Sumter, SC 29l50
::If you read Dr. Nyiszli's book, Auschwitz the story is given there. If I recall correctly, all the escaped prisoners were hunted down in the surrounding forests. I think that all of them were eventually killed. I don't recall any mention of flame throwers. 66.108.105.21 17:06, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Read
Talk:New Jersey in the 21st century

message: Anyone have ideas for additional topics that should be discussed on this page?  Here's two.  Please add to this list. --ChrisRuvolo (t) 20:45, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional topics? 

message: Hello all, I was wondering if we should add the 2024 North Jersey Earthquake to this list.
In general, this list seems to have not been updated with events since Hurricane Sandy. It's missing Bridgegate as well. ItzSwirlz (talk) 02:05, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding the 2024 New Jerey Earthquake
Talk:Momentum (TobyMac album)

message: I noticed in the article, it mentions that artists like Joanna Valencia and TruDog are featured on songs, but the track listing has no info on that. Is there a reason for that?72.74.136.49 (talk) 22:00, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The actual wording is "music artists to appear on this CD include". It doesn't indicate that they're featured. As for "Tru-Dog", he's not even mentioned in that section, he's mentioned in the guest appearances section, and it's clear on which track he appears. It should be referenced though. Are you just wondering on which tracks each of the listed artists appear? Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:06, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Featured Artists
Talk:Pregabalin

message: Text explains no direct action on GABA (A or B) receptors, which is fair.
At the same section, there is a glorious figure of a GABA receptor and pregabalin molecules as if they are agonists on it, and a caption that only says "Pregabalin is not a GABAA or GABAB receptor agonist". Why have a figure showing it as agonist just to say it is NOT an agonist? The figure serves no purpose at all.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.11.230.77 (talk) 09:26, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: @86.11.230.77 what is the adult does of Pregabalin? 41.57.95.36 (talk) 00:28, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Pharmacology

message: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2791798/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Govedo321 (talk • contribs) 19:17, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: 9 year old primary source; not useful in Wikipedia. See WP:MEDDEF and all of WP:MEDRS. Jytdog (talk) 22:55, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  pregabalin blocks formations of new synapses,  drastically reducing the potential for rejuvenating brain plasticity. 

message: Hae mach 105.196.173.82 (talk) 06:41, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  How mach  

message: I refer to the edit https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pregabalin&diff=1208934179&oldid=1208821290
I visited the User talk:Publishedarticles and found out that other editors consider that "it appears as if your primary purpose on Wikipedia is to add citations to research published by a small group of researchers". While this may be true, but this particular edit, in isolation, seems to be relevant and compliant. If the administration considers that the user Publishedarticles violates the rules of Wikipedia, than the administrators will take administrative action. Still, that edit is OK in my opinion. If you think that this edit is not OK, please give your argument other than that it was done by a user suspected in adding citations to research published by a small group of researchers. Maxim Masiutin (talk) 17:02, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I provided a reason in the edit summary. This is WP:CITESPAM. Publishedarticles has spent years adding references to papers by Jamir Pitton Rissardo and it is apparently their sole reason for editing here. These edits are self-promotional. They have racked up warnings over the years yet continue to do so. Per policy the links should be removed and the user warned which is what happened here. Upholding policy is not the sole domain of administrators.  ThaddeusSholto (talk) 17:10, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for the explanation, I didn't know that all the articles are by Jamir Pitton Rissardo. Your explanation makes sense, thank you again! Maxim Masiutin (talk) 17:28, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[User:Publishedarticles]]
Template talk:Alaskatasks

message: I've started the categories page, following the example on Hawaii, but I'm not sure I understand what the shortcut to history is on the Alaska tasks page. Utah has an example, an outline of Utahan history, but no links. What do we want to do with this? How do we update the tasks list? Deirdre 20:53, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure I completely understand... are you asking how to edit what appears in this template/to-do list?  If so, that's at [ Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Alaska/to_do]If not, we can start an outline of Alaskan history by simply typing text at that page.  If your question isn't either of those two, then I'm really confused (sorry!).... let me know.  —akghetto talk 03:16, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, not how to edit it, rather, what is the link from the Alaskatasks template to History supposed to be? what is the purpose of the page we would create there? If we want to create an outline of Alaska history, as you indicate, and as appears to have been done on the Utah page I linked to above, that's easy enough. If so, would this be useful? would we want to make links from that page to different history articles and subsections about Alaska? I guess I'm asking what the envisioned point of such a page would be. I can see how a thoroughly linked outline could be useful as a navigation guide and a way of organizing articles we'd like to see along with those we already have. Hope I'm being clearer here. Deirdre 06:21, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Aahhh!  The "History" redlink two links to the right of the recent changes link, ON the template.  Above the to-do list?  Got it (at least, I hope I understood this time ;) ).... to be honest, I copied that template over from the Hawaii page I believe when I started the project to begin with.  Looking at Hawaii though, they too have a red-link.  Looking at Utah's use of the page, it's rather hard to tell what they use it for.  A template?  The beginnings of an article?  I'm not sure either.... Regardless, I don't really see the need for it at this point.  If you want to keep it, I'd be fine with that, I just didn't pay attention to that detail when I copied over.  One thing I do rather like is Michigan's use of "Project Divisions" .  I could see this being of great use - for us to coordinate our collective work within the divisions.  What are your thoughts? —akghetto talk 06:53, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yuppers, you got it. I'm finding more examples to draw from on the Portal:United States page, so I'll look into that. I think the Project Divisions idea is great. Go for it. Deirdre 07:47, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Welcome to Diverse City

message: The version of Burn For You on WOW 2007 was a remix, the Shortwave Radio Mix specifically, from Renovating Diverse City. I've made the appropiate change. --ToyoWolf 03:03, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Burn For You on WOW 2007 

message: There are only 16 tracks on Diverse City not 17. There is no remixed version of phenomenon on there I will remove it. The K.O. King (talk) 15:43, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phenomenon 

message: I see that MOC, a featured artist on the track "Catchafire (Whoopsi-Daisy)", doesn't have her own Wikipedia page, nor mob-action, another featured artist on the album. I don't know how to make a Wikipedia page, but does someone here know? If so, can you please make one? Thanks.209.213.155.16 (talk) 22:23, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: To create an article you should make sure that the subject meets either the general notability guidelines, notability criteria for musicians and ensembles or some other guidelines. Then create an article with all the referenced information you can find. With that said, neither MOC nor mob-action appear to meet any notability criteria so I think that's why they don't yet have an article. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:51, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  MOC and mob-action
Talk:Gene Autry

message: During the 1980’s, Autry hosted a show on The Nashville Network on Sundays, which showed his movies. I checked the article and didn’t see a reference to it. Since TNN is defunct, it may be difficult to come up with anything substantive, but it would add a little more info to the article if anyone can dig it up. /johnfromwv 75.108.209.204 (talk) 23:33, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  TNN 

message: User:Tillywilly17/Be Honest with Me
I wrote an article on Gene Autry song from 1941. I don't believe I have the power to move it into the main directory. Can an admin please help me out?
Note: it started out as a translation, but bears no resemblance to the original Tillywilly17 (talk) 01:08, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Be Honest With Me
Talk:List of public libraries in Ontario

message: Hello, I hope this start-up page will lead to many of the libraries in Ontario having articles written for them at the WIKI and linked to this master list of Ontario Public Libraries.  
* "Build It And They Will Come" SirIsaacBrock 21:09, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Initial Comment

message: North York Central Library is actually part of the Toronto Public Library. Therefore, I am not sure if they should be on the same hierarchical level. Is there a consensus about shifting North York Central Library one level below the rest of the listing items? Gerogia 20:17, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  North York Central Library 
Template talk:User yi

message: I don't have the character set and couldn't edit this anyway but wouldn't mameloshn be better than muttersprach for this template?
:As I understand it, mameloshn is another name for the Yiddish language, while mutershprakh is the Yiddish word for "native language". So "English is my native language" in Yiddish is English iz mayn mutershprakh; English iz mayn mameloshn would be nonsense. If I understand the situation correctly. Angr/talk 14:26, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Beyond Belief: Fact or Fiction?

message: I cannot tell which is the correct title, with or without the "?"
Imdb is without the "?" http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0138956/, but Episode guide has the "?" http://epguides.com/BeyondBelief/ .  It seems pretty evenly divided, but I would go with Beyond Belief: Fact or Fiction (no "?") as suggested by the title credits http://epguides.com/BeyondBelief/logo.jpg
Google unfortunately does not distinguish "?" so a googlefight doesn't work --Reflex Reaction (talk)• 21:16, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Correct name?
Talk:Stradbroke Island

message: I believe the more common name is Stradbroke Island, for example in newspaper articles such as Sydney Morning Herald of 10 Jan 2006.  Wikipedia:Naming conventions states: "Generally, article naming should give priority to what the majority of English speakers would most easily recognize, with a reasonable minimum of ambiguity, while at the same time making linking to those articles easy and second nature."  
Unlike Uluru, where the indigenous name has wide acceptance and recognition amongst Australians, the indigenous name for this island is not much known to those of us not from Queensland, nor used in the press.  I think this article should be named Stradbroke Island in accordance with the Wikipedia naming policy.--A  Y  Arktos 21:17, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of article
Talk:Probation (workplace)

message: This is clearly related to the concept of "academic probation", and perhaps someone should write about this. Izzycat 21:17, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. But in a way, all new employees are placed on "probation" uuupu
during the first few weeks with a company (for reasons stated in the article). Academic probation is usually given to a college student who is teetering on "flunking out" (that is, they had poor grades during a semester, and are given a semester to "shape up"). [[Briguy52748 18:56, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

message: oooooooooooojNo one has cared to add real resources to this page. Each business has a different probational period and does not represent the general idea as a whole. 64.113.124.158 (talk) 03:15, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggesting deletion of this page.
Talk:Aristotelian theory of gravity

message: Is there support for Aristotle using the term "center of the Earth"? This presents not only a spherical view of the Earth (which, yes, had already been suggested by others), but also would account for people being able to walk "upside-down" on the "other side" of the Earth - my reading suggests people had great difficulty with Antipodes, believing one would "fall off" in such nether-places --JimWae 20:37, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Aristotle, like all the ancient greeks, knew that the Earth was round. He mentions well worn arguments for this--- namely that you can see further from a tower, or equivalently that you can see a tower from further away, or a ships mast before the ship. The dependence of the distance you can see on the height of the tower is D=\sqrt{hR}, the geometric mean of the height h of the tower and the radius R of the Earth, and a few measurements from towers allows you to estimate the radius of the Earth.Likebox (talk) 22:23, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

text: I see your point, but it was my impression that Aristotle thought that the Earth was round because it was agglomerated on the center of the universe in a uniform way, all the "Earth" element fell to the center and made a sphere. So he didn't think that the Earth attracted heavy objects, rather that the Earth was sitting right where all heavy objects would most like to be. This leads to the no-falling-off condition.Likebox (talk) 08:03, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fall to center of earth? 

message: It seems to me that this article has a mistaken title and should be merged with other Aristotelian articles.  There was no theory of gravity when Aristotle was alive, and hence there is not Aristotelian theory of gravity.  This is not to say that Aristotle did not try to provide reasons why objects fell to the earth, rather, this is to say that his reasons had nothing to do with gravity defined as the force of attraction between all masses in the universe.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.245.232.197 (talk) 05:55, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Aristotelian Gravity" makes no sense
Talk:Gossamer (Looney Tunes)

message: As much trouble as the anonymous category vandal has caused in the past, I have no problem adding :Category:Fictional monsters to this page. It fits. — BrianSmithson 21:42, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Categories

message: I know Gossamer isn't a Disney character, but does anyone recall seeing what looks like him walking to the horizon in Fantasia? Orthografer 02:02, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: During which segment? — Brian (talk) 02:34, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fantasia 

message: At the end of this article it states that Gossamer appeared in a Weight Watchers commercial.  This is not true.  The character that appears in the commercial is called a "Hungry Monster".  He may look like Gossamer, but is a separate character created by Weight Watchers.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cairnben (talk • contribs) 18:15, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weight Watchers 

message: Why isn't this article titled "Rudolph (Looney Tunes)"? According to the article, the name Gossamer does not appear until the monster's third appearance. The "Later appearances" section is vague regarding the character's name. I propose either a clarifying statement ("...was named "Gossamer in all later appearances...") or changing the article's title. Brendanmccabe (talk) 13:12, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: just found the cartoon on youtube...recorded relevant part on audacity, pumped up volume, set on infinite loop playback...it's Bruda or Brooda... 71.162.113.226 (talk) 15:27, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  dig the wax outcha ears... 

message: Gossamer's original name was Bruda in Water, Water Every Hare. 50.159.185.82 (talk) 15:46, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gossamer
Talk:Interactive Storytelling Game

message: I just did a major edit to the initial (and nearly orphan) post.  It still reads like an advert for the ISG linked at the bottom of the page.  Is this page even worth the effort of saving and cleaning? The Bearded One 04:34, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: This page is a mess

message: Here's a real kick in the pants: I just read through my downloaded PDF version of Fantasy Imperium, and right there on page 11 of the .pdf (page 1 of the Introduction) is the quote, "Fantasy Imperium is a Historical Fantasy Role Playing Game set in Medieval Europe."
Since the term "Interactive Storytelling Game" does not appear in the text of the game itself (though it is on the website), I nominate this article for deletion. The Bearded One 06:47, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Nomination for Deletion

message: I don't understand the redirect. In the AfD discussion we had proposed redirects to
Role-playing game, Interactive storytelling Storytelling game and  no one mentiond redirect to Interactive fiction yet it ends up pointing there.
It its OK with people I'd like to change this to a four way redirect. --Salix alba (talk) 12:25, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Strange redirect
Talk:Bogor Palace

message: Agree with proposal, sensible to merge Istana Bogor, Bogor into Istana Bogor. Curiously enough, both articles were created on the same day by the same IP, and contain much the same text.--cjllw | TALK 21:55, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal

message: Shouldn't this article be called "Bogor Palace" seeing as this is English Wikipedia? If nobody objects, I'll move it. After all, the Eiffel Tower article is not called "Tour Eiffel". Davidelit (talk) 18:00, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yup - agree. But I don't agree with Around Indonesia --Merbabu (talk) 13:51, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Move proposal
Talk:Lutheran Student Movement – USA

message: Well well well... looks like I'm not the only person who was interested in there being an LSM page on Wikipedia.
It looks to me like somebody was just waiting for the page to pop up so that he or she could make additions to make the page even more accurate.
And given the nature of the additions, especially that link to that one site where Lutherans are apparently hot, I'm guessing that that person might just well have a site dedicated to an addiction to him... Jimmy 21:55, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:National Car Museum of Iran

message: You claim that Hitler has visited Iran, but I can not find any reliable sources on the Internet that he did so.
82.70.40.190
----
Aytakin, Any proof of Hitler's visit to Iran? or it is only a typo!
It is very important to support the article with valid and reliable sources / links. 
82.70.40.190
:My only proof is the tour guide in the museum. --(Aytakin) | Talk 21:12, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Any sources for the "history" section? Or is someone just making this up? Especially the bit about the Arab prince. 1000 cars for $5m USD is $5,000 a car, that is absurdly underpriced. I suspect someone has made this up.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by BardiaSaeedi (talk • contribs) 07:30, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cars sold to Arab Prince