Talk:Westchester, Los Angeles

message: The Theme Building and E. Noyes architecture on the Otis campus are, in fact, rather relevant and significant to both local residents and the general public. Well, OK, maybe just the architecture geeks care so much about the IBM building. Still, it is important and worth including.
:Please sign your contributions by striking the tilde key (~) four times. Sincerely, GeorgeLouis (talk) 19:36, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Otis buildings

message: I grew up in Westchester in the 60's and 70's. We always considered the 405 as the eastern border of Westchester. Anything east of that was Inglewood. Also we considered Pershing Dr. the western limit of Westchester even though I believe theres a street sign on Manchester near Westchester High that says "Playa Del Rey". Dr. Morbius 21:28, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Borders of L.A.'s neighborhoods are notoriously undefined. We need a source for the one used in this article. Sincerely, GeorgeLouis (talk) 19:35, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Borders of Westchester

message: This article really needs sources. There are many statements that are simply opinion, pure and simple, and others which may be true, but we have no way of checking them. Sincerely, GeorgeLouis (talk) 04:59, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. I lived in Westchester from 1970-1978 and there was no "covenant-enforced segregation" that I could see. I went to Westchester Lutheran School on Sepulveda Blvd., and it was definitely not white only! In fact, I think I'll go back and edit that statement out; it's inflammatory and unsubstantiated.Henitsirk (talk) 01:37, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

text: I also agree.  The first few sentences of this article states a lot, but has no sources to back it up. It should either be sourced, or deleted.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.167.231.182 (talk) 03:03, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

text: Agreed with above and that more sources are needed, even for seemingly trivial statements such as "Westchester is becoming more eclectic" that stand out as being possible original research without something to verify it ... cheers, --guyzero | talk 17:15, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources needed 

message: Some recent changes involved some good updating, but let's not just delete the 2000 figures taken from Mapping L.A. Yours, GeorgeLouis (talk) 16:08, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The references to American Fact Finder are quite opaque. They don't seem to lead to pages concerning Westchester. GeorgeLouis (talk) 16:14, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Apparently, this old geezer believes anything from the LATimes and whatever news it publishes.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.249.57.108 (talk) 04:17, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent changes 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Westchester, Los Angeles. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100707164120/http://www.la84foundation.org/6oic/OfficialReports/1932/1932s.pdf to http://www.la84foundation.org/6oic/OfficialReports/1932/1932s.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:12, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified