lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Peretz Hirschbein

message: I see there is a request for adding his name in Yiddish. I will admit to being illiterate in Yiddish. I see that the Hebrew article is entitled "פרץ הירשביין". Is that the correct Yiddish spelling of his name? - Jmabel | Talk 02:40, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not quite. The first name would have the vowels indicated (פערעץ), but the second vowel of his surname requires diacritics I don't have. Will come back to this. -- Deborahjay (talk) 11:34, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Listed name
Talk:MorphOS

message: There need to be more clarification about this in the article.
Which elements of MorphOS are open source? Or which elements of MorphOS are proprietary.
This article is somewhat confusing. Very sad that there aren't many pieces of information about this Amiga-like operating system.
Komitsuki (talk) 01:11, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: mixed proprietary and open source?

message: Be good. I've unprotected because there seem to be no ongoing discussions. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 06:03, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Unprotected

message: I was reading the beginning of this article, stating that MorphOS is an open source operating system.
However, the box on the side states that MorphOS is closed source.  Which one is it?
-mogchr 12:27 GMT -5:00
:Mixed. The kernel and many core OS functions are proprietary and closed source, but then the desktop Ambient and I think some other portions are open source. DanielM 00:59, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Contradition: Open Source or Closed Source?

message: Informations about MorphOS releases are both in simple table and text bellow (which contains mostly the same informations). I would like to join both groups in single table. Any objections? Pavlor (talk) 10:44, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Doubled informations about MorphOS versions
Talk:Jesse Colburn

message: Jessie or Jesse?
Which is the correct spelling of his first name? This needs to be fixed... 84.66.67.187 08:45, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Just noticed this myself. According to his website, the spelling is 'Jesse'. Have moved the page... --Kurt Shaped Box 19:59, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: spelling 

message: The official website link is dead now... and i"m removing it. --Starryboy 15:50, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Just to make a note...
Talk:Layne Beachley

message: Not an encyclopedia article. - Mike Rosoft 09:08, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have removed some material that states her birth name, and who she was born to, as well as speculation that she joined surfing to cope with personal loss. None of this is sourced, and I don't see how we can justify adding the material without any sources, especially as this could be false. - Tbsdy lives (talk) 10:37, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uncited material 

message: The following is unsourced information:
*Her aggressive surfing style has earned her such nicknames as "The Beast" and "Gidget". 
*She founded Aim For The Stars Foundation to financially help girls and young women achieve their ambitions and help  them in life.
*In August 2006 she successfully reclaimed the world's number one ranking for the first time in over two years by winning the Brazilian leg of the world tour.
*One of her favourite beaches is believed to be Long Reef, a popular beach in Sydney's Northern Beaches of Australia.
While this is interesting, we can't use it unless you provide a source. Also, none of this is really trivia, as trivia by its definition is "unimportant information" - it therefore shouldn't be in a trivia section but instead the information should be incorporated into the main article. - Tbsdy lives (talk) 10:39, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further unsourced material 
Talk:Posen Conference

message: *Strongly oppose: Simply on the basis that even though there is an association, Posen Conference and Posen speeches are not the same entity. I'm rather surprised I have to point this out. The Posen Conference, while indeed encompassing the speech Himmler made on October 6, is entirely separate from the speech Himmler made 2 days earlier to a completely different audience. Furthermore, Himmler's speech on October 6 was just one item at the Posen Conference - additional features of that conference would be largely irrelevant in an article about Himmler's speeches, but entirely pertinent in an article about said conference, hence the need for 2 articles. WilliamH (talk) 12:14, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Leng (plateau)

message: In the Epic of King Gesar Ling is Tibet. This epic was known since the 19th century and is from Central Asia.--36.97.187.230 (talk) 20:24, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Origins

message: I sought to correct the incongruity described in the first comment up on this page, then realised  that the two main sections are largely redundant, so I've now merged them.  In addition I've moved the reference by another author to a section with the Stephen King name-drop.  Ordinarily I'd ask first, but seeing as the remark above pointing out a blatant mistake went unanswered for nearly four months, I'm guessing that this page is as abandonned as the Plateau of Leng itself... Thermaland 20:23, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merged two sections
Talk:100 Huntley Street

message: Anyone who knows about if Mr. Bombay or any others who were old hosts please fill in the details. 129.97.224.85 11:19, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cal Bombay was a host? 

message: Moira needs an article on Wikipedia - then her name could become wikilinked on 100 Huntley Street.  (Note Wikipedia's Moira Brown is a Canadian right whale researcher.)  The first step is to decide how people would find this Norma Brown - go to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_people_with_surname_Brown#History.2C_philosophy.2C_and_religion and come up with a unique article name - this is where I'm not sure what would be the appropriate label for her - but it would be under History, philosophy, and religion - possibly Moira Brown (television presenter). Important to get that right to avoid future confusion if a redirect is needed. 
As a native of Peterborough, Ontario she can then be added to http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Peterborough%2C_Ontario&action=edit§ion=27
--User:Brenont (talk) 16:37, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moira Brown (née Hunt) 

message: No mention of why Ron Mainse was off the air for almost 6 months??130.63.125.71 (talk) 03:41, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: GORD DRIVER's PONZI SCHEME
Talk:Sosumi

message: What is the Japanese character/word "sosumi," as referenced in the article? I'm assuming there isn't one, so that should be mentioned.
:There isn't one, but it makes a convienient fiction to get a lawyer off one's back. --Carnildo 19:59, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, if you check http://www.omniglot.com/writing/japanese_hiragana.htm You can figure out the exact characters.  My computer doesn't have the Japanese IME right now, but tomorrow when I get on a iMac at school I might try to translate the romaji into hiragana, unless somebody else can do it before 8:30 am ADT. --Ampersand2006 ( & ) 00:24, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Here it is: 祖すみ at least I think that's it... --Ampersand2006 ( & ) 11:31, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It doesn't really mean anything in Japanese. You'd be best off using katakana: ソスミ. The hiragana is そすみ. The 祖 character you mentioned before is a kanji that's pronounced as "so", but it doesn't really make sense to use it here. 195.241.69.171 (talk) 19:02, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japanese? 

message: Howdy. Wikipedia noob here! Why is this article in the category Macintosh Firmware? I mean, I don't believe Sosumi, which is a sound file, has anything to do with firmware... SkiSkywalker 04:37, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Firmware? 

message: Howdy! Seasoned Wikipedia fan here. I just wanted to explain why I re-removed the mention of Wall-E from the article.
Sosumi is one of several alert sounds that came with System 7, for when the software needed to alert you. In contrast, the startup chime featured in Wall-E is one of several sounds that have been embedded in Mac firmware over the years, to be played early in the startup process. Sosumi is not a startup chime. The cited interview with Jim Reekes covers both sounds; it does not say that Sosumi was used in Wall-E.  ⫷ SkiSkywalker ⫸ (talk) 18:54, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sosumi is not a startup chime 

message: The article mentions that the sound was going to be renamed but the name was left intact for Big Sur. I can't verify this, because as of 11.2.3 (20D91) it's called Sonumi. I'm not sure if I should remove the claim or if the change was made later. --Steven Fisher (talk) 23:06, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sonumi 

message: I assume the sound hasn't changed since release until Big Sur. I was thinking about making a fair use file of the Sosumi file from OS X Mavericks. Is it worth a fair use usage? Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 05:47, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sosumi as a sound itself
Talk:Gestational carrier

message: The carrier is not the mother, either in genetic material or by a life long committment to raise the child.  There needs to be a strong line between the carrier and mother.  Too often in todays society such terms lead to legal battles, next we would see a gestational mother wanting rights with that child, because she too to is a mother to him or her. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.62.38.151 (talk) 13:33, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  A good term
Talk:Rose (Doctor Who episode)

message: The title of this article is ambiguous despite having a parenthetical disambiguator, and one would think if anything the character would be the primary topic of "Rose (Doctor Who)", since she appeared in multiple episodes beyond this one, and this title would redirect there. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 10:47, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: this is a fair point. I'm curious if we should make similar provisions for Timeless (Star Trek: Voyager) to Timeless (Star Trek: Voyager episode) to differentiate from Timeless (Doctor Who) which redirects to Timeless (Cole novel)?-🐦Do☭torWho42 (⭐) 09:01, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Umm... no... that's a completely dissimilar problem, since Doctor Who is a separate franchise from Star Trek (let alone Voyager)... ? Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 09:53, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind then!-🐦Do☭torWho42 (⭐) 16:06, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is the title not [[Rose (Doctor Who episode)]]? 

message: There are at least two different professional books which have been published, specifically examining both the 'behind the scenes' real world development of 'Rose' and the thematic elements which make it up. These are not versions of the story itself, but are (semi) academic studies of the episode as whole, written by people unconnected with the creation of the story on television, and are primarily made up of critical analysis.  I added this detail to the page but one editor keeps changing/undoing the section to headline it first 'Commercial releases' alongside dvds etc, and then 'Printed releases' alongside the novelisation.  
These are clearly not the same thing but the user in question is unwilling to engage in discussion (ignoring/deleting an attempt to open a dialogue on his talk page and adding no note to his reversions/changes).
Life is too short to keep coming back here (and on other Doctor Who pages) to revert his changes, but perhaps I'm missing something - sis the consensus that something like the Complete History or The Black Archive books on 'Rose' are in fact somehow versions of the story itself?  If that is the consensus, then fine, but it'd be interesting to know if I'm wasting my time... 
I've put the page back to what I think the more useful layout for now. StuartDouglas (talk) 15:13, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Critical Analysis
Talk:Battle of Rivoli

message: This article could do with a complete rewrite.  It is quite inaccurate as it stands.  Unfortunately, it misleadingly makes use of a book by Burton, which was re-published in 2010 (making it appear modern) but was first issued in 1912.  It is completely outdated, and makes some statements that could only be made by someone who has never seen the terrain, or looked at the best sources available (such as the Oesterreiches Militaerische Zeitschrift).  In short, the article is not to the standard we might hope to see from Wikipedia these days.  If I have time, I may place an article about the battle on my own website, rather than try to rewrite this one. 
Dr Martin Boycott-Brown (talk) 10:33, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs rewriting
Talk:Comparative literature

message: Isn't this text a bit to Anglo-centric? Surely, comp. lit. exists in other language and cultural spaces too. (E.g. Komparistik in German)
:Fixed --Dpr 10:01, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Chrominance

message: __TOC__
 I wonder how chrominance was defined. How did they come up with this particular color plane, as you can find it with YUV? Why is red in the upper edge, and purples on the red side? There must be some logic behind that. Thanks, --Abdull 13:16, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)

message: I don't think SMPTE has said anything on this, but would it sort of make sense to call it chroma?  For one, it rhymes with luma.
On the other hand, chroma is an ambiguous word since it means something else in the Munsell color system.  Chrominance may mean something other than video chroma if you're talking about the chrominance in Lab color space.  This unfortunate ambiguity aside, the terms luma and chroma do make more sense than luma and chrominance.  In my opinion. Glennchan 05:24, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's often called chroma.  But I'm not sure what the story is on that.  It was called chrominance for a long time, as luma was called luminance.  Did they change both?  Or just luma?  Beats me. Dicklyon 06:55, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A book by Hazeltine laboratories staff (they were part of the original NTSC committee) uses the terms luminance.  However, they recognized the difference between "luma" and luminance (the luma video page, which you've read, describes this difference).  I think they use the term chrominance, although I may be wrong.  I think they also used the symbol "Y' ", but again I can't remember.Glennchan 05:54, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chrominance should be called chroma? 

message: Article- see the difference between chrominance and chromaticity  Glennchan 06:06, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Your link is bad.  But your point is true.  However, though they are different in detail and not 1:1 related, they are both luminance (and hue) of a sort. Dicklyon 06:32, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chrominance not the same thing as the saturation described on the wikipedia saturation page 

message: Monocolor broadcasting may be the technology of the past. But still, the color killer should also be mentioned while discussing the color burst. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 08:22, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Color killer 

message: AFAIU, chrominance has two components, Cb and Cr, luminance has one (Y). The example shows only two images, one of them Y (luminance), the other obviously Cb. So the example description is wrong, or the set of images is incomplete.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.38.2.58 (talk) 08:03, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incomplete Example Images ?
Talk:Rif

message: As you can see I have carried out an overhaul of the Rif article. Among other things I have moved the list of Rifain tribes to the article on Rifains. This is because the Rif article is a mountain article and deals with the mountain rage itself, as opposed to the Rifains. On another note, what do you think of the history section? Other articles on mountains don't seem to contain a history section. Elostirion (talk) 04:26, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Tribes/History

message: I've removed the section on race was added last spring as it was an unattributed copy/paste (w/later modifications) from the Riffian people article. The source for the content is an outdated publication by Carleton S. Coon from 1939. If material on the people of the region is added - the content should be based on relevant modern sources. Vsmith (talk) 03:01, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Riffian people 

message: Rif doesn't include all Tangier or Tetouan  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.49.166.177 (talk) 14:59, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  The map is wrong 
Talk:Seifert–Van Kampen theorem

message: :Section added. —Nils von Barth (nbarth) (talk) 20:15, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sufficient conditions 

message: It would be nice with a couple of examples of applications. YohanN7 (talk) 18:48, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: eh, examples are nice, even better if they are somewhat interesting. that computation of π1(S^2) is a trivial one; both A and B are disks. maybe we can replace the e.g. Mct mht (talk) 04:08, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

text: I added another calculation, the n fold torus, but its formatted quite badly so it would be great of someone better at this could make it more concise and more aesthetically pleasing. I also might have made a few errors so it would be great if someone could help proof read it. LkNsngth (talk) 04:43, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I tried to make it more aesthetically pleasing and got completely carried away. I want to say that your argument was correct. Orthografer (talk) 07:02, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you did a good jobLkNsngth (talk) 17:12, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sample Applications 

message: It would be nice if this article had a history section, at least to explain what was done by Seifert and what by van Kampen. Algebraist 23:46, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Seconded. Sam nead (talk) 13:58, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: This page should include a proof of the theorem. There is a concise/intuitive proof using descent here: https://www3.nd.edu/~andyp/notes/SeifertVanKampen.pdf  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.220.45.91 (talk) 04:34, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  Why do you feel that this article should include the proof? Here's the relevant Manual of Style page. siddharthist (talk) 07:38, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proof 

message: Under Examples -> 2-Sphere: What is the product $\cdot$ used in $\pi_1(A) \cdot \pi_1(B)$? What is the map $\Phi$?
It would also be extremely helpful to identify why $\ker \Phi$ appears here, since quotients are not mentioned anywhere else in the exposition (except perhaps implicitly as added relations in the amalgamated product).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dzackgarza (talk • contribs) 22:41, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undefined notation/maps
Talk:List of administrative divisions of Beijing

message: Hi, I'm new here. The  Most wanted page said that a list of districts was needed for Beijing, and I had a book about Beijing, and have been there a couple times. I don't know if I did right in creating this. If not, sorry. --Zero37 14:14, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Atriplex

message: Should this be moved to garden orach?  "Red orach" and "garden orach" are listed as synonyms for Atriplex hortensis in several places, but I seem to find more references overall to "garden orach".  In particular, ITIS seems to consider that to be the primary common name.  Also, I believe that "garden orach" is the literal translation of the Latin name.
Pekinensis 14:24, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: :The two Atriplex species listed for birdwatching in the Lower Colorado River Valley are:
::*Quail bush, Atriplex lentiformis
::*Saltbush, Atriplex polycarpa
:(I just started a category for the LCRV, the lower Colo. Riv. Valley.)--MMcAnnis,YumaAZ--Mmcannis 21:19, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Lower Colorado River valley Atriplex

message: please no common names in the taxabox species list. these can go into a "Species" section in the text. --Sarefo 11:01, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  taxobox 

message: I learned in a class that a Canadian sp. and a Mexican sp. hybridized on the Bonneville Salt Flat of Utah to produce a 12n polyploid. Does anyone know anything about this? Ninjatacoshell 17:25, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genetics 
Talk:Secondary market

message: The primary market is an investment market; the money goes to the company.  The secondary market is a speculative market; money does not reach the company, it merely pays off the gamble made by speculative investors and pure speculators.
:But it is an investment for the buyer of the security and the company not only cares where it sends the dividends, share holders also control the company. Nshuks7 (talk) 19:05, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Primary:secondary::investment:speculation

message: Is there an example of a (popular) primary financial market which is not a secondary market as well? Nshuks7 (talk) 19:05, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Reasonable doubt?

message: The definition of Securities include Derivatives, and the definition of Financial Instruments include both Securities and Derivatives. It looks like Financial Instruments is the only term required to avoid redundancy and confusion.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 160.83.42.136 (talk) 12:55, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Securities and Financial Instruments
Talk:The Logic of Scientific Discovery

message: I've removed this sentence. It seems to be a perfectly legitimate bit of technical jargon in the academic study of the philosophy of science, but without any cross links or "see also's" to explain it or give context, it is meaningless to me and probably to the average reader. 
Please discuss here. It should be linked and expanded before any reinsertion.
Dpbsmith (talk) 14:27, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: "Falsification also comes to replace convention as a marker of the problem of demarcation."

message: I don't think that statement is correct. A rewrite suggests significant changes to the original. But LoSD is a direct translation - Popper even states in the translators' notes: 
Dahauns (talk) 22:02, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm I don't know... The following paragraph explains that the English version adds appendixes and notes with corrections, expansions, and author's changes of mind, so maybe the base text was only translated, but I'm not sure about the whole product. Certainly it would have been a second edition if the original had been in English and all the new material had been incorporated into the main text. --ExperiencedArticleFixer (talk) 00:42, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: 'Popper rewrote his book in English from the 1934 German original'
Talk:List of health departments and ministries

message: Why non-ministries are removed ? They do not bear the name ministry, but they are commonly referred to as ministries.  — Instantnood 14:35, Mar 23, 2005 (UTC)
:If they do not bear the same name, why would they need a disambiguation page?--Huaiwei 14:47, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: That isnt what disambiguation pages are for. There is such a thing called "categories" for that.--Huaiwei 15:09, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)

text: The UK health department was formed after a merger of the Ministry of Health and the Ministry of Social Security way back in 1966. Has the Hong Kong health bureau ever been officially called a Ministry? Either way, this is not important. A disambiguation page refers to similar names. Not similar "old names" unless there is a SEPERATE article for it, nor is it for "commonly called yet unofficial" names for a governmental department.--Huaiwei 17:30, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Ministries?