Talk:Depth psychology

message: I see all the online dictionaries refer to depth psychology as any psychoanalytic approach to the psyche, which may be technically correct, but a review of how the term is commonly used within the depth psychological community leads one to consider that perhaps it is actually the jungian approach that is generally referred to as depth psychology. other psychologies have depth, but its within the post-jungian tradition that the term is used to refer to itself. All to say, I find this page inaccurate, but am hesitant to go radically adjust someone else's entry because I, being a post jungian, may be mis-informed. On the other hand, also having studied within the psychoanalytic tradition, no one there refers to themselves as depth psychologists, so i continue to suspect that "depth psychology" actually refers to jungian and post-jungian schools of thought. Majicshrink (talk) 22:26, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  OTHER 

message: i removed " was strongly influenced by esotericism and draws on myths, archetypes and the idea of the collective unconscious." at the end of this article in an attempt to communicate the same idea with less vague and biased language. Majicshrink (talk) 05:14, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: speaking of biased language, why are the examples of nonspiritual aspirations att negative? Should i add religious zeolotry and terrorism as (the only) examples of spiritual aspirations?
Also, i fact tagged the b"only sane and whole to the degree that we take care of our environment" A branch of psych is really based on calling a large part of the populaion insane and not all there?!Dillypickle (talk) 11:21, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: i think this whole article is biased and inaccurate. it appears as if someone read a book by aziz and decided that represented all of depth psychology, without really understanding what they were talking about. sorry if thats harsh. it needs a ton of work to be nearer to accurate and unbiased. imho. Majirinki (talk) 23:36, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  edits 

message: How come all 4 references in "Related reading" are by the same author?--217.11.187.8 (talk) 14:55, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Who knows? Maybe Robert Aziz put them there and nobody thought of removing them. But I'll do that now. Lova Falk talk 14:17, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Related reading 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Depth psychology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130412130703/http://www.randifredricks.com/randi/depth.cfm to http://www.randifredricks.com/randi/depth.cfm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091109200038/http://www.itp.edu/ to http://www.itp.edu/
*Added archive https://archive.is/20081204114730/http://www.depth-psychotherapy-network.com/Consumer_Section/Orientation_Overviews/Jungian%20Psychotherapy/Harris_Jungian.htm to http://www.depth-psychotherapy-network.com/Consumer_Section/Orientation_Overviews/Jungian%20Psychotherapy/Harris_Jungian.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:19, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified