Talk:Legal financing

message: Litigation funding appears to describe an identical concept.  Saligron 11:28, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redundant with existing topic 

message: Spam content and links continue to be reinserted and reverted. Non-notable and blatant commercial websites and self-serving "associations" do not meet WP:EL or WP:RS; source content to legitimate, independent news reporting meeting WP:RS, and discuss edits here first. Flowanda | Talk 08:04, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It still partly looks like an advertisement for the phenomena. Could be rewritten. --82.131.110.10 (talk) 00:09, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  May 2011 -- spam content and links 

message: It seems that Litigation Funding (UK) and Legal financing cover the same ground.  Since articles are about things and not terms, having two articles about the same thing is a form of content forkery.  It also appears, by the edit history of the redirect litigation funding that this merger has already taken place in the past. — Æµ§œš¹ [ãːɱ ˈfɹ̠ˤʷɪ̃ə̃nlɪ] 12:42, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The Litigation Funding (UK) page been greatly expanded over the almost 4 years since this merge proposal was last discussed. Given this (referenced) expansion the proposal to merge no longer seems tenable, as it discussed UK-specific law that would unduly swamp the target. Therefore I'll remove the merge tag; if there was interest in a merge, perhaps a new discussion could be started.Klbrain (talk) 12:37, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal

message: The article Pre-settlement_funding has little content and is duplicative of this article. Arllaw (talk) 03:35, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm also proposing again that the Litigation funding article (mentioned five years ago as being a UK-specific article) be merged as well. They are on the exact same topic, and being a worldwide project we generally do not silo our topics according to how they apply to different countries. Although a "litigation funding in the United Kingdom" article would be technically possible, there is so much overlap with this one, and the content of that article is so much poorer, that I think it would be better to simply port any useful information from that article to be a subsection here. It would take a fair amount of work, but I don't think it would be controversial … I think anyone who feels up to the task should just be bold and do it. - Wikidemon (talk) 00:54, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger Proposal 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Legal financing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111207025034/http://www.americanlegalfin.com/FactsAboutALFA.asp to http://www.americanlegalfin.com/FactsAboutALFA.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:12, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The pages on Litigation funding, Legal financing (this one) and Champerty overlap. Also 'litigation finance'. Room for at least one merger.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.119.117.119 (talk) 07:52, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: for Litigation funding. I note that Champerty is now at Champerty and maintenance. Klbrain (talk) 13:28, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overlapping pages