lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Tu'i Malila

message: I would very much doubt that this named tortoise is in the family Cheloniinae. As most of the members are sea turtles. but i fixed the link to point to that subfamily anyway as i really don't know. sunja 01:38, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correction 

message: :This particular tortoise was given to the royal family in either 1773 or 1777, the exact date is not known. It remained in the care of the Tongan royal family until its death by natural causes on 1965-05-19. This means that upon its death, Tu'i Malila was either 188 or 192 years old
The number of years given as the age of the animal at death is the difference between the year it died and the year it was offered as a gift by Cook -- not necessarily when it was born. Thus, unless it is known that it was born in that same year -- which then should be specified in the text -- the age-at-death given should be considered the minimum possible age it reached. --Cotoco 11:05, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks to user 70.110.204.93 for adding "at least". --Cotoco 19:58, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age at death 

message: Congratulations on the picture, which is a classic; the bemused body language of the people as they contemplate the small aged lump on the ground speaks volumes about the monarchy, colonialism, tortoises, and the interactions thereof. -Ashley Pomeroy 15:14, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: I have just discovered another page on the same topic (created in February 2007), I am transforming it into a redirect, and leave this link towards a last version before redirecting. Nothing very useful seemingly - a non sourced assertion according to which the tortoise would have been blinded in 1918, if somebody wants to reuse it... French Tourist 21:20, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Double page - making a redirect 

message: "c. 1777–May 19, 1966" (...) "death on 19 May, 1965"
Can anyone clear up the discrepancy? 83.132.98.135 01:16, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction in dates 

message: Hello -
I'm fairly unfamiliar with what level of "significance" is needed to include an "In Fiction" section,
and am on the fence with this:
Philip K. Dick's famous novel "Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep", which is the basis of the even more famous movie "Bladerunner", opens with a brief epigraph quoting a 1966 Reuters new clip about Tu'i Malila's death https://www.shmoop.com/do-androids-dream-of-electric-sheep/epigraph.html.
Does that make the grade ?
Doc ocelot (talk) 21:01, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Significance of opening passage in Androids Dream of Electric Sheep
Talk:Pacific Air Forces

message: U.S. Pacific Air Forces → Pacific Air Forces – Proper name of the USAF Major Command.  --Pmsyyz 01:38, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: *Do any other countries have Pacific Air Forces? Philip Baird Shearer 17:19, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: Deleted the line: "( in United States' government terms - the countries in this area would mostly dispute any USA 'responsibility' in respect of their particular areas)".  As far as the national interests and international commitments of the United States go in this region of the world, the Pacific and Indian Oceans are, indisputably within PACAF's "area of responsibility," and I'm not sure which "countries in this area" dispute that. 61.34.55.133 00:57, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Responsibility" 

message: I have added the unreferenced template to a number of sections in this article . For such a large detailed article it needs inline citations.  I note in the reference section it says "This article includes content from ..." Please see the articles Western Allied invasion of Germany and the Operation Matterhorn to see how the text that comes from a  public domain work of the United States Government can be cited. --Philip Baird Shearer (talk) 17:53, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Now that citations have been added :-) there is another problem :-( Any books that are cited need page numbers to be included in the in-line citations. --Philip Baird Shearer (talk) 13:47, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Adding the unreferenced templates

message: "Gen. Lori Robinson became the first woman to lead a U.S. Air Force Component Major Command when she succeeded Carlisle during the ceremony."  http://www.af.mil/News/ArticleDisplay/tabid/223/Article/518657/robinson-takes-command-of-pacaf.aspx  — MrDolomite • Talk 21:14, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  2014-10 new commander
Talk:Nellie Cornish

message: This article survived a Vote for Deletion. It was requested that the article be expanded, however. The discussion can be found here. -Splash 01:43, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope, the link can't be found there. I'd like to hear the reasoning. 67.169.127.166 (talk) 14:32, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vote for Deletion 

message: As of today, this biography article is mostly primary sources - using Cornish's own autobiography. The article was tagged for clean up, see WP:RS. Jooojay (talk) 19:39, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: * Under life and Work section, please add after this setence: "She returned to Seattle, where she founded the Cornish School in 1914."
* Add the following text with citation:
** "In 1918, Cornish invited poet Maurice Browne and actress Ellen Van Volkenburg to found a theater department at her school. The Brownes were founders of the Chicago Little Theatre, which they closed in 1917. The department, with its incorporation of scenic design, music, and dance in its productions, became central to Cornish's plans to ally the arts.
Greg Henderson (talk) 16:33, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Greghenderson2006: Do you have a independent source for this? Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 19:59, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

text: — Antrotherkus Talk to me! 20:47, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text:  Please replace 2nd source stiked out with this as an indenpendent source.
 Greg Henderson (talk) 20:18, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request - add info
Talk:Burr puzzle

message: Most Burr Puzzle discussion I've seen has defined the solution as taking apart the puzzle, not putting it together.
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 155.212.27.134 (talk • contribs) .
:Probably because taking it apart is easier than putting it together, and if you know one, the other is just the reverse. --ssd (talk) 13:04, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are the pictures reversed? 

message: how about the origin of the puzzle? Xah Lee 12:08, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  origin 

message: I made a puzzle called the two-piece knot. is it a burr or is it "knot"?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.185.3.0 (talk) 23:16, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  two-piece knot  

message: This is Edakoodam. It is in Kerala before 16th century. So This page must be redirected to That page. --Ranjithsiji (talk) 11:43, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Not per WP:COMMONNAME. (Hohum @) 16:23, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edakoodam
Talk:Charles S. Howard

message: This article survived a Vote for Deletion. The discussion can be found here. -Splash 01:54, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vote for Deletion 
Talk:Karl Sverkersson

message: Why are the first 6 Karls not mentioned in the legendary and semi legendary kings?
:They were all just called "Carolus", and all six were described briefly and in complimentary terms, but not enough to include in what you asked about. The timeline is so extremely silly (thousands of years) that it's not worth mentioning. There are no actual legends about any of those characters. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 11:07, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legendary/Mythological 

message: Ok, I answered this on the Reference Desk page, but I'll repeat it:
The answer is that Charles VII (Sverkersson) was the first historical king named "Karl". The other 6 were inventions of Johannes Magnus in his book Gothorvm sveonvmqve historia, where the author provides a fictuous list of Swedish kings since the Fall of man. The first king to actually use an ordinal number was Erik XIV, who used Magnus' list. The reason these kings are not listed in the "semi-legendary" or "mythological" kings is that the source is too recent, and not even the most nationalist of historians have believed it since the 18th century. The mythological kings on the other hand are from more contemporary sources like Beowulf, and are harder to disprove. 
An related anecdote is that when Karl XIV Johan became the first Swedish king of Norway, the Norwegians insisted on calling him Charles III, since Norway had only had 2 "Karl"s before him. The king wished to be the XIV in Norway as well, and pointed out that it shouldn't matter since Sweden hadn't had 13 "Karl"s before him, either. As something of a compromise, he was more commonly referred to as "Karl Johan" in Norway, without any ordinal. (Oslo's main street is named after him.) --BluePlatypus 19:15, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ordinal number 

message: Is he the same person as Kol Sverkerson? Ardric47 01:18, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes I think so. / Fred-Chess 21:54, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplicate article? 

message: Did Johannes Magnus invent the House of Munsö, or did he not refer to the kings of that house in his work?
Fred-J 08:57, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I confused Karl with Erik. Question withdrawn. / Fred-J 09:12, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Invented kings 
Talk:Past Lives (Black Sabbath album)

message: According to the back cover of the 2010 reissue of the album: DISC ONE: Recorded in Manchester and at the Rainbow Theatre in London 1973*.
     
         Apparently the date of this show was the 16th of March 1973.
Could anyopne provide souce for this?
83.10.88.109 (talk) 19:33, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  First disc source.
Talk:Paul Graham (programmer)

message: I have seen this hierarchy around, and find it and its associated figure compelling.  But reading this article, I am wondering why this discussion has such notability, such that it warrants an inclusion in the article.  I don't challenge the inclusion, I merely ask for additional development that supports why it is important.  Is it famous?  Why? Where? etc. The supporting citation is to a blogging essay, hardly the sort of substantive citation for Wikipedia. Bdushaw (talk) 22:03, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I’d also like to know. It seems that any popularity it enjoys presently has in part to do with it being included in this Wikipedia article, which makes it seem self-promotional rather than gaining popularity on its own merit. Louie Mantia (talk) 23:12, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

text: I found it coming from here Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions at the top of this page the diagram is there with the a link to this page. At first I thought that was really cool a programmer came up with this but something just feels off that this concept would be novel when behavioral psychology has a couple hundred years of a lead on this developer to coin something like this. I will spend some time looking to see if I can find a older concept that this is derived from or a reason it was specifically chosen for the rules page. Maxinfet (talk) 23:52, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

text: It doesn't. No RS notability. I've removed it unless and until some is shown - David Gerard (talk) 21:59, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

text: is it not funny how the hierarchy of disagreement section damages both the credibility of this article and it’s subject at the same time. 141.0.145.227 (talk) 22:22, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Graham's hierarchy of disagreement? 

message: Paul Graham’s career may span creating startups as well as academic research, though the last few lines of his Career section appear to be… notes about things he’s doing that are unrelated to his career. To me, it almost reads like a news feed from his own website: Paul stopped inviting people to events, Paul stepped down, Paul announced something. I feel like there should be more substance here (if there is substance). From what I can tell, Paul has written essays (which, I’d love clarification on whether these are ‘essays’ or ‘blog posts’) and done little else career-wise since about 2014 when he left YCombinator. Louie Mantia (talk) 23:26, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: yeah, it's basically fan posting. Graham is notable, but that doesn't mean blog posts of no particular real-world impact should be in the article - David Gerard (talk) 22:47, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Career 

message: The redirect Paul Graham (computer programmer has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Utopes (talk / cont) 20:47, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Paul Graham (computer programmer]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:The Essential Allman Brothers Band: The Epic Years

message: The Essential Allman Brothers Band: The Epic Years is the correct title. Teklund 11:26, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Move
Talk:Baiken

message: Lots of references to body parts being weaponry in Dororo, Dororo, I'm just thinking that's a reference.
*Speculation. Danny Lilithborne 23:20, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is Baiken related to/inspired by Osamu Tezuka's Dororo, Dororo. 
Talk:True History of the Kelly Gang

message: Wow! Someone has been busy...I mean its great so much time has been dedicated to this article but really, these "PARCEL"(does this mean "Chapter"??)sections are just over the top!
They are all over the place, and their need is questioned.
Look, this page has been severely ovelaoded by someone's ego. Any one seriously interested in the Novel and Wikipedia will see that these "parcels" are totally uncalled for.
Wikipedia is not the place for frustrated writers and students with b grade essays to unload.
I am removing the BULK of this stuff, and if you have issues take it up with WIKIPEDIA, do not revert!
[mangonorth]'''
I haven't got time right now, but someone needs to take a razor and sticky tape to this article...
~~mangonorth~~
Note that using  on this article is not intended to imply that Ned Kelly was in fact a criminal, merely that he was treated as one by the authorities, and that no better stub category currently exixts. DES 02:23, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: well he robbed a couple of banks--Mongreilf 16:35, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: It was a massive CLEAN UP not VANDALISM

message: The plot summary obviously isn't too long so I've removed the  tag. --Tony Sidaway 05:23, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot summary

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on True History of the Kelly Gang. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070831020001/http://www.mirroroftheworld.com.au/imagination/ned_kelly/video_carey.php to http://www.mirroroftheworld.com.au/imagination/ned_kelly/video_carey.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
 Perry Middlemiss (talk) 09:03, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 
Talk:Nonverbal learning disorder

message: I've removed a ref "supporting" the claim that ICD-10 doesn't classify NVLD.
#The reference removed was to single code on an ICD-10-CM look up service website; ICD-10-CM is technically not the ICD-10; but an adaption specifically used in the USA. 
#Whilst I could have, instead, changed the link to WHO's ICD-10 online browser; WP:BLUESKY and WP:SYNTH suggest doing so wouldn't be needed/appropriate (depending which you want to apply)
 Little pob (talk) 12:10, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  ICD-10 

message: — Assignment last updated by Rahneli (talk) 17:05, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Psychology Capstone

message: Incorporate more historical information? Such as where the term NLD/NVLD started? BrainUnboxed2020 (talk) 22:45, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mykelbust and Johnson
Talk:Love Sculpture

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Diannaa (talk) 23:35, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:John 21:15-19

message: I have redirected this article, for the time being. It is simply a primary source with two lines of summary and two lines about how it is used at popes funerals. No independent citations are supplied to establish notability, and I'm not sure every single bible verse read a pope's funeral deserves it's own article on that single criteria alone (an article on pope's funerals that mention all the verses seems much more appropriate, and after searching we have Funeral of Pope John Paul II which mentions this verse). We have to keep in mind that wikipedia is not a primary source. If this article can be brought up to basic standards, I'd totally support it's inclusion, but for now, I strongly believe the previous article doesn't meet standards and the redirect is superior. -Andrew c [talk] 22:40, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect
Talk:WAITS

message: Link to the musician Tom Waits maybe? In order to aid people who search for 'waits'.
:You can add a disambiguation link at the top if you like. 70.186.172.75 (talk) 04:32, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed! H.dryad (talk) 20:30, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tom Waits
Talk:Islam in Ghana

message: 124.29.194.160 20:05, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect information
Category talk:Robin Hood

message: Robin Hood is charakter, who is a part of English folklore, but not Juraj Jánošík and Zorro of course. These characters need other category, maybe :Category:Heroes by nationality and Juraj Jánošík is a part of :Category:Slovak folklore :) See :Category:Slovak heroes Przykuta 12:18, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  English folklore
Talk:WorldNetDaily

message: https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/inside-the-spectacular-fall-of-the-granddaddy-of-right-wing-conspiracy-sites/2019/04/02/6ac53122-3ba6-11e9-a06c-3ec8ed509d15_story.html Inside the spectacular fall of the granddaddy of right-wing conspiracy sites] and . Doug Weller talk 13:29, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Very sad situation, I understand your concerns Edotor (talk) 14:18, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  2 WAPO reports in 2010 about financial problems, authors not being paid, etc. 

message: Google Search results for wnd.com redirect to a Malware Warning page with: "Warning — visiting this web site may harm your computer!".
User:Newslinger falsely claims this addition is WP:OR, yet it is cited, (I did not archive it), but now I get " 403. That’s an error." ...the googlebot noticed  .... 0mtwb9gd5wx (talk) 04:41, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Look, you need a (reliable) source, such as a newspaper or similar, to write about  this - not just your research. Mvbaron (talk) 06:38, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

text: As WP:OR states,  I reverted your edit (Special:Diff/1108022969) after verifying that the link you cited led to a 403 error page, which made your edit unverifiable. Please verify your source before accusing others of making false claims.Additionally, using a primary source in the manner that was done in Special:Diff/1108022969 to notate a temporary Google Safe Browsing warning constitutes undue weight. Google Safe Browsing flags and unflags many websites every day, and in the absence of reliable secondary source coverage, it is not noteworthy to mention in a Wikipedia article that a particular site is flagged. — Newslinger talk 06:38, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  '''Malware Warning''' 

message: No one has said. Doug Weller talk 10:19, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  What was redacted? 

message: The editors who hover over this article may not agree with the editorial stance of WND but it is not a fake news website. The article's false, libelous, biased description of it as a fake news website should be removed immediately in accordance with long-established Wikipedia policy. 2601:147:C400:1BE0:75EF:6A26:B6A8:1312 (talk) 23:55, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the  template. M.Bitton (talk) 00:00, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 4 May 2023
Talk:HMS Lady Nelson (1798)

message: "H.M.S. Lady Nelson" or something? --Wetman 04:25, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I pondered this, and decided against it on the grounds that a) the real Lady Nelson would, if she had a page, be listed under her first name and last name, rather than her title (Lord Nelson is on here as Horatio Nelson for example); b) she doesn't have a page anyway.  The usual disambiguation for ships seems to be in the form of Loch Ard (ship) or James Craig (barque) which would make this "Lady Nelson (brig)" if it were to happen... but at the moment my preference would be to leave it, and perhaps put a pointer to a page for the person if/when one is created.  --Skud 07:35, 14 July 2005 (UTC)

text: * The current name, "HMS Lady Nelson (1798)", is almost certainly incorrect.  HMS is a prefix for ships, not brigs.  Geo Swan (talk) 22:11, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article currently says:
The USA did go to war with Spain -- the Spanish-American War, Teddy Roosevelt's "Splendid little war" -- but it was almost 100 years later.
The USA's first declared war was with Tripoli, in 1805, and was confined exclusively to the Mediterranean.  
So, I request clarification of this passage.  Geo Swan (talk) 22:11, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: ''"American war against Spain"''?

message: There is information in the history of the above redirect which could be used to expand this article, or could possible be a stand-alone article if enough independent reliable source material is found.  —Anne Delong (talk) 21:10, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Lady Nelson (replica ship)]]
Talk:City on Fire (1987 film)

message: I altered the claims that Reservoir Dogs was based on this film.  I own both films, and they're not as similar as urban legend would have it, though if someone wants to add more specific examples, that would be illuminating. --Misterwindupbird 04:59, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: yeah, the story's the same, but the tensions are different. most of cof is the robbery; the rendezvous is like thirty seconds where the boss says "it must be him he's new." we might try a "city on fire and resevoir dogs" section, discussing both the exaggerated reports of similarity, and the actual similarities. Nateji77 16:03, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, there is peer documentation from a 90's issue of FILM THREAT in an article by Zimmerman, who used to be the reviewer for local Detroit mag ORBIT. This is why Tarentino wears an Orbit T-shirt in Pulp Fiction. MMetro (talk) 10:44, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled