lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Vexillatio

message: Grazzi for the help mi Amici:)
--R.D.H. (Ghost In The Machine) 02:32, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Grazzi

message: The Roman emperors had from the time of Augustus had at their disposal unit in Italy and in the city of Rome. 
???  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:8109:9D80:5C68:20CF:3FAF:B4A1:9EB3 (talk) 19:27, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  ???
Talk:Promoter

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Promoter which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 05:00, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Promoter (biology) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 01:00, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Equatorial Africa

message: Equatorial Africa has some established historical meanings like French Equatorial Africa that are much more restricted than all of Black Africa.
Also, it is not obvious to someone seeing the term that it is supposed to include Southern Africa.--JWB 02:38, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: I want ti know about the animal their features etc.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.93.221.222 (talk) 12:21, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  african wildlife in equatorial region
Talk:Karl von Müller

message: Thank you to Rolfmueller for adding the picture link.
--R.D.H. (Ghost In The Machine) 03:34, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "Selfless and chivalrous until the end, a major concern of his final years was the welfare of the surviving Emden crew."
A bit emotionally charged and therefore POV for a biog. I do not doubt the man's honour, but such language is not really appropriate. Also, this article needs sources!!! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Psidogretro (talk • contribs) 20:07, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 
Talk:Battle of Bedriacum

message: Thanks to SimonP for the redirect.
--R.D.H. (Ghost In The Machine) 03:34, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The map shows Arabia as a Roman province - however Arabia was only added under Trajan about 40 year after the battles of Bedriacum.--Kmhkmh (talk) 04:25, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No it doesn't, Look again.--R.D.H. (Ghost In The Machine) (talk) 11:37, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  To see what exactly? Arabia is still displayed as a part on the Roman empire, so i'm not sure what you are trying to say here. Note, i'm talking about Arabia Petraea and not the Arabian peninsula.--Kmhkmh (talk) 16:37, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You clearly said Arabia above, not Arabia Petraea. So, being a reader and not a mind reader, how was I to know your meaning. I suggest you take the matter up with the map's creator. The reason I added it to this article was to illustrate which provinces supported which Imperial candidates. Towards that end I think it serves the purpose of the article.--R.D.H. (Ghost In The Machine) (talk) 10:34, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  First of all I said "Arabia as roman province", i.e. the roman province arabia, which is well defined term. Moreover what matters here is not really whether my first comment might have been misleading or ambiguous to you or in general (miscommunication happens). What matters here, is that we have an factual error (in the map) and the discussion page of the article is exactly the place to inform about that and to discuss it. Also it should be clear despite the current map being clearly beneficial, that in the long run this needs to fixed (by whoever) - factually false information has no place in WP.--Kmhkmh (talk) 17:25, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  P.S: Another problem with the map the or its thumbnail is, that it doesn't say anything regarding the red area.  Was it neutral territory? Or did it simply cite with whoever was in Rome at the time? Or just undefined? What's with allegiances that switched (Vespasian for instance and his supporters entered the game late)?--Kmhkmh (talk) 18:18, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

text: Well, my friend, you have two options: Either fix it yourself or (as I stated) get in touch with the creator. Those red areas, I presume, are Armenia and Mesopotamia, which swayed between being aligned with Rome and Parthia.--R.D.H. (Ghost In The Machine) (talk) 15:33, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: error in map
Category talk:Rail transport stubs

message: Another new stub subcategory, this one for Korea. slambo 11:33, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: A through F is done, I started on G. slambo 11:33, 12 October 2005 (UTC)

text: G is done.  slambo 11:35, 12 October 2005 (UTC)

text: H through M is done. slambo 13:26, 12 October 2005 (UTC)

text: N through S is done.  slambo 13:34, 12 October 2005 (UTC)

text: T through Z is done.  slambo 13:38, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Korea-rail-stub 

message: All European rail stubs covered in Slambo's scratchpad are sorted; a second pass through the category may be called for, but I'm not doing it tonight.  --CComMack 02:16, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I sorted a few more into it today for entities that cross international boundaries in Europe.  There are probably more that could go in there too, but I don't see them right now. Slambo (Speak) 18:09, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Euro-rail-stub

message: Sorted the remainder of the biographies from US-rail-stub into US-rail-bio-stub. Slambo (Speak) 18:09, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: US-rail-bio-stub

message: In adding the new stub category for Europe, I've reorganized the listing here, but it sort of breaks the classification (under "Rail transport by country": Europe is not a country!).  Also, I wanted to ask here before actually recategorizing :Category:French rail stubs, :Category:Polish rail stubs, and :Category:UK rail stubs to be children of :Category:Europe rail stubs if there's any reason to not do that.  In the meantime, on to sorting!  --CComMack 01:04, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure, as long as we list them on the main rail stubs category page, I don't see much of a reason not to.  They are part of Europe last time I looked.  I'll take a look at the hierarchy listing later today.  Slambo (Speak) 11:07, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Category hierarchy of {{tl|Euro-rail-stub}}
Talk:Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point

message: I go to Cherry Point often and used to live there. This is a pretty good article. However, we might need an article on the (Naval Air Depot) NADEP Cherry Point and Marine Corps Auxiliary Landing Field Bogue Field. These three installations are close to each other; in fact  NADEP is on the Cherry Point base and Bogue is a 45 minute drive away. - Hoshie.Crat 03:57, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I also wonder who was actually deployed in OEF from Cherry Point in those first months after 9/11, as I was on that mission, and we didn't have any Marines. I also note that there's no attribution to the claim that Marines and Corpsmen were involved. Raininja (talk) 03:49, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Nice article, but...
Talk:Anurag Dikshit

message: Hey, please do a Google search before deleting this. OK, he has an unusual name but it is his name.
: Okay, I Googled his name. Maybe add some more to the post to make it noteworthy. One sentence does not make a good Wikipedia link. 'Expand it--Barista | a/k/a マイケル | T/C 04:09, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  Better :-) still needs some work, but much better. --Barista | a/k/a マイケル | T/C 04:27, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: The last name 'Dikshit' is pronounced as dhikshith. Both the 'D' and 't' in the name have a 'Dh' and 'th' sound to it. Someone familiar with IPA please change this in the article. --Mgtm7m (talk) 16:06, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciation

message: Remove Protection from this page Shiwgndf (talk) 18:59, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: and not just because you did not say please - The protection will expire on 22 February, until then you can request a specific change in the form "Please replace XXX with YYY" or "Please add ZZZ between PPP and QQQ".Any such request should be supported by your citations to reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. - Arjayay (talk) 19:46, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove Protection 

message: Please remove redirects because it’s voiding to Presenting other articles. Bytexincc (talk) 18:37, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove Redirects
Talk:Mary, Queen of the World Cathedral

message: I've added the weasel tag in regards to the March 7, 2000 protest in the church.  The paragraph, while factually correct, reads very NPOV. If somebody can fix it before I can, that would be great.  Dspserpico 03:19, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weasel Words 

message: I'm confused about the date on which it was recognized as a monument. The article states May 14, 2006, the leaflet of the cathedral mentions May 14, 2002, the website of the government (Parks Canada, Federal heritage) mentions March 28, 2000. So, what is it?
Jurjenb (talk) 16:48, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  National monument status 

message: This does not make sense. Auxiliary bishops are titular bishops. Since the text does not mention ordinaries, I must assume that that is what was meant by "titular" but since the text also does not cite a source, I am powerless to ascertain the truth of my assumption! Elizium23 (talk) 07:40, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Titular/auxiliary bishops buried?
Talk:Burr Ridge, Illinois

message: Why on earth is there a list of stores?  What's the relevance?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.167.199.122 (talk) 23:08, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Arthrogryposis multiplex congenita

message: Although the above is mostly accurate, from what I have found out since I was old enough to both understand and investigate the condition further, there are several things in the above that I would disagree strongly with.
Firstly, as I understand it from what I have discussed with the specialists responsible for treating me, the majority of cases are actually leaning towards the severe side, with even the minor ones having quite heavily restricted joint movement, and even in the rarest of mild cases it can limit your career options and hinder your performance in life.
Also, from my understanding of the condition, it is also genetic, and can potentially (but not always be passed on)  
(I myself (Mark Fox) Suffer from it in what can be considered to be a very mild case which left me unable to use my fingers at all until quite a late stage in my childhood. 20 years on from the initial diagnosis, I still lack the full use of my fingers, and still suffer from pain after extended periods of activity)
:The preceding comments were entered into the article by Madon.  I have moved it to the talk page.  -- JamesTeterenko 04:12, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Thoughts of a sufferer of this condition
Talk:Brainpower

message: This article was unsuccessfully nominated for deletion.  See the record at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Brainpower.  Postdlf 04:18, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/His Majesty, Richard lake, King of The Sakonta Tribe

message: To whom it may concern,
I would like to make it known to everyone out there that reads this website, that this "tribe" was created by me, Richard Lake, as nothing more than a fictitious game as a youngster. I thought it would be fun, and it was... as a game: NOTHING MORE THAN A GAME. My parents and family had no bearing in the "game," although they did find it fun in a way, but knew that in the end, as did I, that is was nothing more than a make-believe game. I would furthermore like to make it known that I in no way acknowledge the Sakonta "tribe" as a real tribal or ethnic group, but rather signify that "Sakonta" was created by me as a fun way to experiment in politics, but was NEVER meant to be taken seriously. The fictitious tribe of Sakonta was dissolved years ago. Thank you all for understanding that Sakonta was never meant to be anything other than a fun way to experience politics in a fictional/reality way. In no way did I ever believe that Sakonta was a REAL country or tribe. Please regard ANY information concerning The Sakonta Tribe or People or Nation as nonsensical and make-believe, for it was NEVER meant to be taken seriously. :) I hope no "harm" was done. I wish everyone the best. Lskr (talk) 10:22, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Zuo Ci

message: This article was unsuccessfully nominated for deletion.  See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Zuo Ci for a record.  Postdlf 04:27, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This really is what Wikipedia is for.  This article has moved on an amazing amount since the first version, which was unsuccessfully nominated for deletion.  Andymc 21:33, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amazing work
Talk:Nonexistence

message: The result of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nonexistence was "Redirect to existence."   There are a number of IPs, some static, some dynamic that have been changing this to redirect to "Nothing" in violation of established consensus.   If someone wants to change this, please start a proper WP:RFC here with reasoning to change this consensus.  Thank you.  Toddst1 (talk) 18:36, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please stop changing redirect without consensus
Talk:Chamber tumulus

message: Disagree: Merging Chamber tomb with all of its related subcategories would create a rather unwieldingly big article that's hostile to future extension
Whatdoitypehere 04:36, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that there are lots of subcategories that should remain on their own pages but do not chamber tomb and chamber tumulus refer to the same thing? My understanding is that they are both generic terms for prehistoric tombs with burial chambers in them and as I can't see any reason to keep them separate, should they not be merged? adamsan 10:25, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: comments
Talk:Agaric

message: I copied this article from the Standard American Encyclopedia of 1905.  Its copyright has expired, and the text is in the public domain.  -- Dominus 04:39, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source 

message: I have changed this to redirect to Agaricales, because most of the incoming links seem to intend that meaning.  I have also made a note at that article that the common name can be ambiguous.  — Pekinensis 21:19, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect
Talk:Ode to Psyche

message: I remember this page being here at some point in the past, perhaps it was deleted. I assure any skeptics that this article can and should be expanded; there is a fair bit of commentary on it in my volume of Keats but I confess that I scarcely understand it, due to a lack of knowledge on the mythology involved. I'm sure, however, that someone could come along and discuss Keats's perspective, the symbolism of the poem, and its meaning with regards to his worldview and Romanticism. --Tothebarricades 04:55, July 23, 2005 (UTC)
:The page that was here wasn't a proper article, just a copy of the source text.  See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Ode to Psyche.  The text was transwikied to Wikisource. —Cryptic (talk) 11:01, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment by [[User:Tothebarricades.tk|Tothebarricades]]
Talk:Celebrity Fit Club

message: I think it should be spilt into two articles.. Do you aggre? --eddie 20:43, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split? 

message: It's not true that Carnie Wilson (Season 4 U.S. version) will be the first contestant to have had gastric bypass. Ralphie May (Season 1 U.S. version) has had it. Several sentences under "Season 4" need to be edited or taken out to make an accurate statement. 24.99.184.158 04:31, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gastric bypass 

message: I found the use of nicknames and/or first names only difficult to follow. Such as the use of "Ant" in the season three discussion about Jeff Conaway as well as only using the first name to start off the discussion about "Jeffs Exit" and then no qualification as to which jeff is being discussed (Jeff Rudom?) until the section where the individual in question refers to himself as "Jeff Conaway". Who is Ant anyway?I already forgot 11:58, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Using nicknames 

message: I noticed that, in the section concerning US Season 4, alternative cast members to what has been officially announced on the VH1 site have been added, in a very confusing method.  Also, the source from which this list was lifted has confirmed that one person that it speculated on is actually dead.  Perhaps this should be removed completely for the official cast list? Wyldphyre 18:00, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speculation and formatting 

message: I added a "Citation Needed" to the Season 5 section. Is there any official release that states that these will, indeed, be the contestants on the next season?  If so, it needs to be added here for cross-referencing purposes. --ClintFord 15:18, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Season 5 

message: I'd like to reintroduce the idea of splitting the article into two: one for the British version, a second for the American version. I'll cite a couple of examples of British shows remade in the US that might serve as good reference points:
* The Office: Because both series - The Office (UK TV series) and The Office (US TV series) - have been successful and are different enough, they both deserve pages of their own. See also: Queer as Folk.
* Men Behaving Badly: on the other hand, this series was only successful in Britain. The American version was quickly cancelled. Fittingly, there is only a mention of the US version on the page for the UK show; nothing more is needed. See also: Iron Chef (from Japan).
In the case of Celebrity Fit Club, both versions of the series have been successful and - I would argue - deserve their own pages. Doc502 16:22, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split discussion (again)?
Talk:Ruben

message: This originally was redirecting to Reuben but then was changed to redirect to Reuben (Bible). Since Reuben is a disambig page that also points to Reuben (Bible), and since someone searching for the sandwich or the band are as likely to misspell them as someone searching for the Bible character, I changed it back. -- Zawersh 05:21, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect destination
Talk:Lzop

message: I did a fast comparison "lzop 1.01" vs "gzip -1" on a 173 MB text file:
* gzip -1 .. -9, resulting file sizes are 53.5 .. 42.5 MB;
* lzop -1 .. -6, resulting file sizes are 65.5 .. 66.0 MB;
* (lzop -7 .. -9, resulting file sizes are ~48..47.0 MB)
More interesting, compression+decompression times are (Athlon 2300+):
* lzop -1..-6:  compress time 6.7-7.4 sec (25.9 MB/sec) ; decompression time ~1.3 sec (133.5 MB/sec);
* gzip -1:      compress time    12.9 sec (13.4 MB/sec) ; decompression time ~3.1 sec ( 56.0 MB/sec)
So, lzop is about 1.9 x faster on compress (vs gzip -1), and 2.38 x faster on decompress (vs gzip -1),
for the faster modes (-1 .. -6, all about the same), at the cost of a 23% larger compressed 
image (vs gzip -1) in this case (53.5 MB (gzip), 66 MB(lzop)).
Note that lzop -7 .. -9 modes are very slow on compressing (even 2-3x slower than gzip -9 !!),
but the filesize is still slightly worse than e.g. gzip -5 (average mode);
decompressing speed is as good as for other levels (~ 7 sec).
[so, if reasonable compress times are important for you, not only decompress times, don't use levels -7 .. -9 (consider gzip); 
if compression time does not matter, but fast decompression is important: use level -7 .. -9]
Note2: lzop modes -1..-6 and -7..-9 are similar (in resulting size); [-2..-6 are even exactly the same mode!]  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.43.95.214 (talk) 08:53, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Small Benchmark

message: I fail to see how lzop itself is notable. LZO, the algorithm, yes, but lzop the utility? Not really.
76.119.157.207 (talk) 05:57, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability (or lack thereof)
Talk:Frankfort, Illinois

message: Any specific photo requests? 75.34.192.48 (talk) 23:44, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is no need to list individual names relating to relatively minor local crimes, see WP:BLPNAME and WP:BLPCRIME. These people are living persons and Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons applies here even though this is not a biography article. Listing crimes in the lead section of an article is also not needed or appropriate see, WP:LEAD. Unless they are someone on the level of Al Capone or Ted Bundy there is no need for the names to be here. --Dual Freq (talk) 17:45, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Names 

message: I added information to the page about the Frankfort Bluegrass festival held every second week in July. I also added a link to the festival. 
http://www.frankfortbluegrassfest.com  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mandnalynnsunshine (talk • contribs) 22:16, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Information added 
Talk:City Building (series)

message: Should this article include CivCity: Rome?  It seems like it might be a similar style game.  I've never played it but I'm just wondering.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.231.48.33 (talk) 20:44, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: CivCity: Rome

message: I have removed the below chunk of text from the article. It contains information which should be distributed to the individual game articles, not kept here. Run! 19:06, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Excess information

message: Should the actual article be renamed since it doesn't include an actual full listing of city building games, but just those that have been published by Sierra?
For example Anno2070 and it's precursor are both of a similar style with the same kinds of mechanics, but aren't listed.
If you broaden the scope to include other city building series with different mechanics, like Sim City, then it would be even better.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.5.137.70 (talk) 08:12, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article only contains Sierra published games 