lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hemiandrus

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 21:51, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 
Talk:List of locust species

message: Wouldn't this page be better merged with "locust"? Roy Bateman (talk) 06:47, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Dead right. I shall do so as soon as I get down to rationalising the articles on migratory locust and locust. JonRichfield (talk) 04:36, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Haslam, South Australia

message: Which is it? NinetyCharacters (talk) 09:29, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I would be inclined to go with village. It is such a small settlement and has no facilities to speak of, i can't see how it would be called a town. That being said, i don't think there is strict consensus on exactly what defines a town or village. Kare Kare (talk) 05:27, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Haslam was gazetted as a town in 1913 and as a locality in 2001 - please refer article.  Regards Cowdy001 (talk) 04:21, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Town or village?
Talk:CRC Churches International

message: The following articles are 'good article' class articles for denominations:
* Brazilian Catholic Apostolic Church
* Orthodox Church in America
* Russian Orthodox Church Outside Russia
* Pennsylvania Ministerium
There are no featured articles or A-class articles for denominations as yet.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Natebailey (talk • contribs) 10:33, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good articles for denominations (examples for improving this page) 

message: The Crusade Bible College, established in 1959 was re-developed into Tabor College in 1979 by then principal, Dr Barry Chant. Resource Christian Music was established out of Christian Resource Centre (Heatherton CRC) by Dennis and Nolene Prince in 1981.
The Revival Centres International group was the result of a 1958 schism from the Revival Crusade.
===Bibliography===
* 
* 
* 
[End of unsourced/self-published-sourced material. HrafnTalkStalk(P) 03:25, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Offshoot organisations

message: * 
* 
* 
[End of unsourced/self-published-sourced material. HrafnTalkStalk(P) 03:25, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Bibliography

message: I have substantially written the current article CRC Churches International and was hopeful that the attached tag and the disambiguation note within could both now be removed.Rob Nyhuis (talk) 06:15, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I haven't looked to the notability note, but for the disambiguation note, you haven't addressed the concern, probably because the concern isn't worded very clearly.  The sentence "Converted under the itinerant ministry of South African, Frederick Van Eyck, Harris' father became an Apostolic Church" ends with a link to Apostolic Church.  If you click on that link, you will see that that term refers to several different things, and most of our readers, myself included, have no idea which of those, if any, you are saying is intended.  If you can explain which of those (if any) is meant, it's easy to fix, for example, if "Apostolic Church" in this case were to mean "Armenian Apostolic Church", you could write Apostolic Church, which would show the same text, but have the link from "Apostolic Church" in this article point directly at the article at Armenian Apostolic Church.  I realize it's a bit confusing, but if you can tell me which if any of the specific topics listed at Apostolic Church is intended by the text here, we can fix it up in a jiffy.  --j⚛e deckertalk 19:56, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Full disclosure: I'm not Pentecostal but I go to an Assemblies of God church anyway, so if anyone disagrees with my assessment, they are free to revert.  I've reviewed the sources and determined there is enough for notability here.  Some of the sources are not independent though and I didn't review the material they are supporting to determine if they are appropriate or not.--v/r - TP 13:49, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update
Talk:Ghana Premier League

message: The link to Thomas Boakye is incorrect. That is a different person with the same name. One Thomas Boakye was Goalking in 1991 playing for Asante Kotoko. The Thomas Boakye who is linked to was born 2 years later. Does nobody check the links? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2a00:1028:8d1c:1bc6:5054:45ec:95e1:c4fb (talk) 20:51, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect link
Talk:List of birds of Italy

message: This revision replaces the previous primary source, Bird Checklists of the World (Avibase), with iGoTerra. These are the changes:
*Add a family and five species, delete 13 species, and revise tags per iGoTerra.
*Revise a name and correct errant sequences of species per Clements.
*Revise population status notes per Avibase.
*Revise the references, counts, and text to reflect the above.
Craigthebirder (talk) 15:30, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  October 30, 2020 revision
Talk:Eusebius of Alexandria

message: I took out "the Lord" in the sentence beginning "They deal with the life of..." and replaced it with "Jesus of Nazareth", which has a Wikipedia entry. I don't know how to put in a link, so would someone please do that and then explain to me how to do links. 
Thanks
Yo
YoMenashe (talk) 23:30, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  requires a link
Talk:Accessibility on Apple operating systems

message: Universal Access was the marketing name for a set of features. Now, Apple just calls these features "Accessibility", without giving them specific marketing name.
I have no issue with this article remaining as-is, but if anyone wants to refresh it, one option might be to move this to Accessibility on Apple platforms (or something similar), and add tons of stuff to that article covering each of Apple's OSes. There'd be tons of material. DFlhb (talk) 10:25, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Move boldly done. Several of our Apple operating system articles have entire sections about accessibility, yet these accessibility features are mostly identical across their OSes. Hence the move, which will allow us to build out this article, turn those sections into WP:SUMMARY-style overviews, and avoid the redundancy. DFlhb (talk) 16:21, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Universal Access
Talk:Basilides

message: I have deleted the unsourced sentence: 
"In all likelihood this 'Gospel' was compiled out of the canonical Gospels, the text being curtailed and altered to suit his Gnostic tenets, a diatessaron on Gnostic lines."
The "canonical gospels" were not distinguished from other accounts until centuries later. Basilides' writings were contemporaneous or earlier than at least some of the writings selected for the New Testament. The idea that the "canonical gospels" are historically accurate and other writings of the period are not is a contentious and far from generally accepted point of view even among Christian theologians, let alone scholars in general. Enon (talk) 20:08, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Writings - Gospel according to Basilides 

message: As of now, I am finished editing Basilides. My goal was to shorten the article, and to make it understandable. I believe I did just that. I also tried to remain unbiased. If anybody thinks I did a poor job, you can reverse my work.
Also, here is a list of things I think need to be fixed:
*Reference #1 (not clear)
*Reference #7 (I couldn't find a online addition to verify it, somebody needs to verify if that's a valid reference)
*Reference #15 (not clear)
*Reference #16 (Origen's Commentary on Romans is missing Book 4, so I think this is a bad reference)
*References #17, #19, #21-23, #25-26 (I couldn't find an online addition to verify these, somebody needs to verify if those are valid references)
*References #41-45 (I'm too lazy to verify these)
*Links to Theodoret's Compendium of Heretical Accounts, Psuedo-Tertullian's Against All Heresies, Origen's "Odes of Basilides", and the Basilidean Fragments of Clement of Alexandria would be great.
*At least three things are unsourced, get sources for those.Glorthac (talk) 02:30, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: MISSION ACCOMPLISHED

message: I have removed the  and replaced it with  because the current Wikipedia text no longer seems to include any EB text. 
Most of the text seems to be based on one source:
*
We have a simple rule for citing citations from a secondary source "say where you read it". I have put  on some of the citations because either I could not find them or they are derived from Hort but contain information that Horst does not include (or if he does it will take more time than I am willing to spend looking through his work), so I leave it to others to continue the work.
-- PBS (talk) 18:42, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Now, if the citations are verified, are they still considered secondary? At some point they should be linked to Wikisource. Kramden (talk) 19:28, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: April 2011
Talk:Heritage streetcar

message: The article states that the terms "trolley" and "streetcar" are interchangeable in the U.S.  I thought so as well, but was adamantly corrected.  It seems that a "trolley" can be an interurban, but a streetcar isn't.  Or wasn't. --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 20:29, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interchangeable? 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Lennart97 (talk) 14:04, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Heritage streetcar →  – All article titles in Wikipedia use "tram" instead of "streetcar" except those dealing with tramways of American cities. Requesting move in line with Wikipedia's naming conventions. linhart.stephen 13:35, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 5 July 2021
Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2007-04-16/A Wikipedia education

message: It may be worth mentioning that, in response to Larry Sanger's reported criticism of Wikipedia as being "broken beyond repair", a certain Robert Steadman from Matlock wrote a letter that was published in The Times on 16 April complaining that Wikipedia is riddled with errors and trivia, and some articles are controlled by cabals who push their POV.     
It is not clear whether the writer is the same person as the Robert Steadman about whom we have have an article.  Two editors with similar names ( and ) have been banned: the former claimed to be him, and the latter claimed to be the same person as the former.  After some problems (mainly about articles to do with religion, as far as I can see), the first was blocked indefinitely by InShaneee in April 2006.  The second was blocked indefinitely by InShaneee in July 2006 as a sockpuppet of the first. -- ALoan (Talk) 10:10, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, and Talk:Robert Steadman mentions another letter in the Daily Mail. -- ALoan (Talk) 20:20, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:USA Next

message: I have my doubts about the neutrality of this article, as I see a section full of negative commentary labeled "Criticism", but no similar section for positive commentary.  Is there no positive commentary on this organization, or rebuttal of the negative, even from its own sources?   F117-A 05:28, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I had trouble finding neutral sources. I did find a criticism on the Right and some mild support or neutrality from Christianity Today.--T. Anthony (talk) 03:47, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV? 
Talk:Miss Iceland

message: and in case of additions: http://is.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ungfr%C3%BA_%C3%8Dsland  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Comp.arch (talk • contribs) 10:41, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. Geraldshields11 (talk) 17:05, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  For right Icelandic names 
Talk:Loren Miller (libertarian activist)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Lightoil (talk) 14:51, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Loren Miller (activist) →  – The current disambiguator doesn't adequately distinguish Loren Miller, whom our article describes as a civil rights activist. I don't really care whether we use "libertarian" (a previous title) or "libertarian activist", but since the page has moved around more than once I figured I'd put it up for discussion. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 07:53, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 4 April 2024
Talk:Prostitution in Iceland

message: March 17 OF WHAT YEAR???  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.156.87.78 (talk) 05:33, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: The article said that the stripping have been banned, citing article that talk about the decision.  The articles were written close to the date of the decision.  It would be better if we can have reference that describe how the decision was implement, so we can see if the ban really happens or if there was just a decision that was not followed.
205.228.53.11 (talk) 14:51, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference on the ban of stripping 
Talk:Epiprocta

message: *Keep -- The dragonfly article is about a very familiar type of insect, so it's the kind of page that kids go to when writing reports for elementary school.  Taxonomy gets lost on pages like that.  On the other hand, when I'm surfing taxa I don't want to get a redirect to a mostly-irrelevant article. --Dan Wylie-Sears 2 (talk) 00:39, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sequela

message: So basically, "sequela" is fancy Latin for "consequence", right? —Nahum Reduta 10:21, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Loquacity

message: ...post-traumatic stress disorder may be a psychological sequela of rape.  
Need to cite a reference to this or use a better example.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 214.13.167.254 (talk) 08:29, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Poor Example

message: While the example given is certainly accurate, and such statements are often made; the term "sequela" is mainly used to describe the consequences of medical illnesses/diseases.  Rape is not an illness or disease.
How about giving a strictly-medical example, such as, "Infertility is often a sequela of cystic fibrosis"?  Or, "Rheumatic heart disease is a potentially deadly sequela of rheumatic fever"?  These sound better to me.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eztidun (talk • contribs) 14:48, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  I agree about the "rape" example 

message: Seems to me that this article belongs in wiktionary, rather than wikipedia. It's not am encyclopaedic entry or concept.
5.10.152.60 (talk) 10:08, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wiktionary 

message: The direct should be removed. 47.144.156.90 (talk) 17:31, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Post-viral syndrome directs here, but is not mentioned in the article.
Talk:Ajmer rape case

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
I have cleaned up this article a bit, but it needs a lot more work - and more sources. I also think the name of the article is inappropriate and propose that it be moved. "Sex scandal" implies to me some sort of lurid tabloid story rather than the very serious case of rape and blackmail described in the piece. Not sure about a new name, though. Any suggestions? -- TinaSparkle 10:52, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The only name I could find in the sources is "Ajmer sex and photo blackmail racket". Is that any improvement? --Stemonitis 18:33, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well the element that stands out the most for me is the rape element. What about substituting that word for sex to make the article Ajmer rape scandal? I don't think that would be POV-oriented and it would fulfill WP:PRECISION better then the current title. A very vague and generic option would Ajmer incident. 205.157.110.11 05:30, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

text: How about Ajmer rape trials? Joeldl 07:36, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

text: "Ajmer sex scandal" is also in the third source listed. We shouldn't be inventing a name for this; we should be calling it what the sources do, so our readers can find it. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 04:48, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ajmer Sexual Assaults?  Ford MF 15:29, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
It was requested that this article be renamed but there was no consensus for it be moved. --Stemonitis 11:10, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible renaming 

message: The article said that this incident took place at the Dargah of Ajmer, however it is not mentioned anywhere in the news paper article given as a reference. The article also does not mention any Chishty Farm House. I have thus deleted the line about where the incident took place.
103.240.193.48 (talk) 08:58, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where did it take place? 

message: As I was looking all over internet I could not find that it was rapes of Hindus only or including them kindly provide source I you can. Even though the chesti(a Muslim) was involved and Muslims were the rapist, no mention of victims to be Hindu only is present. Kindly improve this page. RashmikantT (talk) 08:20, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hindu Girls
Talk:Max Anderson (director)

message: The article said he directed it, but most sources (including our article on the film) say he didn't. Our article says he produced it, so I changed this article to say that and added a citation-needed tag. Feel free to edit/remove/whatever. --Colapeninsula (talk) 17:36, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Daybreak in Udi]] 
Talk:Antony Fisher

message: I have removed the quotes from Fisher's sister as they offer little real information and make this section very hard to read. It still has a stilted, bullet-point quality though. We should work to turn this section into good prose.Larrytheordinarydragon (talk) 17:59, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Early years
Talk:Michael Johnson (Australian politician)

message: he's on the ballot for the started election for Maiwar electorate in 2020 but i can find no campaign material. Irtapil (talk) 22:02, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maiwar independent in state election 2020 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Mike Johnson (Louisiana politician) which is of relevance to this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. TarnishedPathtalk 23:46, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion in progress
Talk:Africa Fighting Malaria

message: The Testimonial section seems to serve little purpose here. 24.126.105.239 (talk) 02:25, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It seemed like promotional material to me, and was added (or most recently added) by an employee of the AFM.  I've removed it for now.  An external link to this material would be acceptable, but its wholesale reproduction in the article is not.  --Plumbago (talk) 13:03, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Further to the above, the promotional material that I (and others) removed has been repeatedly restored (without comment) by what appears to be a single-purpose account (Greenerapples), that has now violated 3RR.  Hopefully they'll explain their actions here at some point.  Cheers, --Plumbago (talk) 15:43, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Testimonial section
Talk:Adam Smith Institute

message: I've made a few additions and amendments to this page, such as adding the founders' links with the Conservative Party and a few more details on the Omega Project, and have moved and changed the paragraph regarding Adam Smith International.  Details regarding AS International were previously uncited and had apparently been added by an employee of the organisation. The page is still a bit of a mess, admittedly.  I think it's made it less POV-skewed but would appreciate any comment.--JETM (talk) 17:00, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  updates, May 2009 

message: Anyone here know whether the Liberty League (UK) is still functioning?  Whether it has been folded into some other organization?E.M.Gregory (talk) 15:33, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Liberty League (UK) 

message: It may be a good idea to add a related section, assuming sources exist, —PaleoNeonate – 05:17, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Environment and climate change
Talk:Takashi Kondō

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: not moved (closed by non-admin page mover)  DannyS712 (talk) 05:16, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Takashi Kondō →  – His agency's official page for him spells his name, without a macron, as "Takashi Kondo". Tempjrds (talk) 03:51, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 11 January 2021 
Talk:Hanumappa Sudarshan

message: Amarrg 10:30, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

message: Have added photo and have modified the template suitably. 
Prashanthns (talk) 20:15, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo added 