lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Gary Richardson (lawyer)

message: OK--what do you think?  This is my very FIRST contribution to the WikiProject Oklahoma.  Hope it meets Wiki standards.  By the way, if this guy DOES try and run for Governor of Oklahoma again (this year, 2006), I will note that in the article. User:ProfessorPaul 23:38, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: OK, this is a good beginning

message: OK--good people, I found out Richardson will not be running. I noted that in the article and cited the source (he did not file). Maybe he will enjoy sitting this one out! User:ProfessorPaul 01:37, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sorry I took so long

message: It's articles like this that bog down Wikipedia with useless facts.  Just because he ran for governor and is an attorney does not make him a person of interest.  Gary Richardson has is own biography on his firm's site, along with a resume on another site.  I feel that this article is simple self-promotion or soapbox reading.
Refer to BLP1E:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:BLP1E#Articles_about_people_notable_only_for_one_event
"Wikipedia is not a newspaper. The bare fact that someone has been in the news does not in itself imply that they should be the subject of an encyclopedia entry. Where a person is mentioned by name in a Wikipedia article about a larger subject, but essentially remains a low-profile individual, we should generally avoid having an article on them."
:Anonymous editor, is your concern about notability or verifiability? You added a verifiability concern-related template to the article, but your comment here challenges the individual's notability. --King of the Arverni (talk) 13:21, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment from random citizen
Talk:Neo-Aramaic languages

message: I'm deleting the claim that the Zohar is an early neo-Aramaic text; as this article clearly states, neo-Aramaic refers to vernacular--that is, spoken--forms of Aramaic. The writer(s) of the Zohar knew Aramaic only as a literary language, and mostly through ancient Aramaic texts.Bws2002 (talk) 01:57, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Zohar?
Talk:New Mexico Museum of Space History

message: Shouldn't this article list the entrants? Glocks Out 19:50, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It should. If you have infomation on this, you can add the entrants to this article as well. --Siva1979Talk to me 19:51, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Entrants

message: As far as I can see the Hall of Fame is only actually part of the museum.  Shouldn't this article be moved ? -- Beardo 14:23, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Move
Talk:70th Infantry Division (United Kingdom)

message: Noticed the peer review so did a typo and spell check. Is it General officer Commanding or General Officer Commanding for the header? RegardsKeith-264 (talk) 05:21, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I noticed that too yesterday, I will check Joslen etc tonight to make sure.EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 09:06, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  CE
Talk:Tunbridge Wells railway station

message: This article lacks any sense of the architecture or history of this railway station! Considering that it was in part the railway that led to the importance of the town as a known spa (even though it had existed since the late 18th century, the railway brought more tourists); and the fact that it is now a commuter town; isn't even touched upon - just the dreary set-pattern of explaining a railway station in the UK. And the article on the town barely mentions it at all - just as a "see also" note. No wonder that there are moves afoot to get some sense into it all - see here! Peter Shearan 07:17, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Surely there is more!
Category talk:American musicians by state

message: This is pretty confusing... there doesn't seem to be any specific way these pages are done. Audiori 19:58, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is another category- American musical groups by state.  I think it would be better if bands or groups went into American musical groups by state, and individual musicians went into American musicians by state.  Even better would be if both were renamed such that "United States" replaced "American", but it would be tedious without some automation. --Easytoremember 06:51, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Other category

message: Im approaching this as a participant in the Wikipedia:WikiProject Punk music. I've seen these pages go back and forth several times. Also i notice that Illinois is not listed, whats with that. As for the "list vs. category" debate i dont see why BOTH are valuable, (and related articles should link to each other) 
theres my penny's worth. Xsxex 12:39, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yeah it needs to be organized
Talk:Memorial to Polish Soldiers and German Anti-Fascists

message: I don't know whether it's worth mentioning in the article, but 1972 was probably the high point of relations between the GDR and Poland (they instituted visa-free travel, among other things), with Erich Honecker and Edward Gierek both relatively new and popular. Perhaps "Built amid a climate of improving relations between East Germany and Poland..."? I'll think about it.  ProhibitOnions  (T) 19:59, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Relations between Poland and the GDR
Talk:Paycom Center

message: Much of the content in the article is spoken in first person and is not organized. Grammer edits have been made to correct the present issues. Subtitles for the Hornets and arena improvements have been created to help organize and clean up the article. Kcuello (talk) 13:56, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Grammer / Organization issues

message: The sentence immediately followed by the fifth reference, "The arena is owned by the city and operated by the SMG property management company and has 18,203 seats in the basketball configuration, 15,152 for hockey, and can seat up to 16,591 for concerts." However, the article SMG (property management) shows that the company became defunct in 2019. Therefore, the sentence seems to be in need of an update. Intolerable situation (talk) 02:19, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can someone update this?
Talk:Philbrook Museum of Art

message: This article now meets the requirements for Class C. Bruin2 (talk) 16:54, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Article classification
Talk:Amrita Arora

message: * why IMDb is an exception to the apparent commerical link policy of WP?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imdb
Is it because the filmography apparently is being borrowed from there? Because need not be necessarily from the IMDb. There are umpteen numbers of other sites which give you filmography of actresses more accurately. 
Is there any special deal between WP and IMDb? is reference a reason for including IMDb in External links?
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 219.64.73.49 (talk • contribs) .
*The IMDb is a well trusted (across ze internets) database, and the IMDb article clearly states: The IMDb website consists of the largest known single accumulation of data on individual films (including complete cast and crew listings), television programs (including complete cast and crew listings), direct-to-video product and videogames reaching back to their respective beginnings, and worldwide in scope.. -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 20:20, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Amrita has been Kareena Kapor's best friend for a while now! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.117.145.154 (talk) 23:00, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kareena 
Talk:John Olerud

message: why is the photo of him as a Red Sox? Most people will remember him on the Blue Jays or Mariners
seriously.. somebody put up a mariners or a blue jays picture. 
Why is he listed as never having played in the minor leagues?  A rehab stint still counts as minor league service.
"John Olerud became a Christian after having a brain aneurysm." This is an awfully ham-fisted segue. Whomever tacked on this statement, please find a more artful way to to add it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.72.150.138 (talk) 18:24, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: When is Olerud eligible for induction into the Hall of Fame, and what is the talk on whether he'll make it in or not? 66.49.191.98 (talk) 22:39, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Hall of Fame

message: I removed the stuff about his houses' un obstructed view as non notable nd undue weight. If this turns into some widely covered story, than maybe revisit in the future. Thanks, --Malerooster (talk) 16:09, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Obstructed view "material" 
Talk:Stade Toulousain

message: I have added some info about the clubs football team to this article. However more info is needed. This team seems to be now defunct and from what I can see the club currently only has a rugby union team. The team competed in the French Cup in 1919 but I can find no trace of it after this. Does anybody out there know the rest of the story ? Djln --Djln 11:33, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Lions (United Rugby Championship)

message: Why did they actually change their name? What was the reason given?
*According to the Golden Lions, they conducted "in-depth market research". In other words, it was a branding exercise. Here's my take on the rationale: Before 2005, the two main unions connected with the franchise were the Golden Lions and Free State Cheetahs. The Cats roster drew heavily from both unions, and they split their home games between Johannesburg and Bloemfontein. When the latter team became the core of the new Vodacom Cheetahs franchise, the main reason for using the "Cats" name disappeared. All home games are now in Jo'burg, and a large majority of the players on the Super Rugby side are now drawn from the Golden Lions (although the two other unions associated with the Super Rugby side have feline nicknames, namely Leopards and Pumas). — Dale Arnett 01:40, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Lions?

message: I'm pretty sure the Lions away jersey is red- could someone change this in the image? ronan.evans 13:02, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Jersey

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Crusaders (rugby) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 06:30, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
*Support. Per nom. Yes, Lions (in rugby) to those of us outside South Africa means British (and Irish) Lions, not some new-fangled "franchise". -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:34, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Rugby Australia

message: how can there only have even been 14 Indigenous Wallabies. Clearly shows the lack of focus and not creating opportunities for indigenous communities. It also shows why the NRL and AFL kick the ARU in growing the gane by far. Also why the wallabies amhave been weakening for the past 2 decades. 2001:8003:7405:2301:94C3:B4E2:ED76:1D5F (talk) 09:16, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indigenous Wallabies
Talk:New Zealand Rugby

message: I'm surprised that there isn't a list of officeholders included. I'm just reading an obituary for Archibald Hawke and it says that "he was president of the New Zealand Rugby Union in its second year". It might be good to start a list of presidents; heaps of editors will have a book about the history of rugby union in New Zealand on their bookshelf. Schwede66 20:25, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Officeholders 

message: Can you people not see that the problem with the All Blacks at the moment is the coaching staff.Nothing has changed from Hanson to Foster and because of that the rest of the rugby world has caught up.We need fresh new ideas in coaching and game day plans to put us back in front of the pack.If not it will be goodbye to the world cup.Listen too the people 2001:8004:12C2:47C3:B5B:79C5:F126:7E09 (talk) 05:02, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coaching
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Proposed deletion patrolling

message: Please see the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Proposed deletion#Flawed. Looks like some patrolling is warranted. ~Kvng (talk) 14:19, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flawed 

message: After gaining some experience patrolling, I have streamlined my approach. The instructions in  require a lot of editing for each deprod and I just couldn't keep up. Here's my streamlined approach. Keep in mind that editors are not required to give any justification when deprodding so this streamlined approach is still goes well beyond policy requirements.
# Use Linkclump on WP:PRODSUM to open a batch of soon-to-expire prods in tabs
# Use WP:TWINKLE/Tag feature
## Uncheck  (and  if present)
## Leave a clear deprod rationale in the Twinkle Reason field. A common rationale I use, for instance is "Deletion contested, consider merge or redirect to  as preferred WP:ATD". This rationale will be saved as an edit summary.
# For articles without evidence of notability that have a clear parent topic. I often go straight from prod to redirect by replacing the article contents (including prod tag) with a redirect to the parent topic. For example, non-notable albums can be redirected to an artist or discography article or section and non-notable books can be redirected to their author's article.
~Kvng (talk) 17:36, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Streamlined patrolling 

message: I've been at it again and I've been keeping stats. In March I reviewed 627 proposals and deprodded 229 (37%) of them. 29 (12%) were then sent to AfD and at AfD 11 (34% of AfDs, 5% of deprods) were deleted. 35% of deletion proposals in March were not worthy of deletion. Without patrolling we're unnecessarily deleting 7 articles per day. ~Kvng (talk) 23:13, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  March patrol stats
Talk:Romania national rugby union team

message: Its a fact that Romania was the best European team outside the Five Nations Championship from circa 1960 to 1990, and the entry claims that there were "rumours" that they were invited to join in the 1980s but declined. I would like to ask for any RS that addresses properly the question and if these "rumours" were more then just that.Mistico (talk) 23:00, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Admission at the Five Nations
Talk:Zimbabwe national rugby union team

message: What exactly is that referring to? -Elmer Clark (talk) 19:50, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Barbarian F.C. --MacRusgail (talk) 20:31, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Match vs. "barbarians?" 
Talk:Samoa national rugby union team

message: If the New Zealand side is named by its moniker on Wikipedia, shouldn't this article be renamed Manu Samoa, being that it is the official name of the side? --Bob 15:21, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Depends if it's better known by Manu Samoa or just Samoa. I'd say just Samoa. - Shudde talk 02:05, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

text: Are the Samoan national team know more commonly in the Southern Hemisphere as Manu Samoa? Otherwise I feel the lead needs shifted around a bit. PeemJim86 (talk) 22:30, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Manu Samoa

message: Should the 2017 bankruptcy be in the lead section or just the main body? Mobile mundo (talk) 23:55, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  2017 Samoan bankruptcy
Talk:Georgia national rugby union team

message: Shouldnt there be a French flag next to Claude Saurel? I thought he was French? Narrasawa 03:39, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There was, he is and there is again. Somebody added some data to this page but also made wholesale deletions with no reason given. For some reason they put a Georgian flag next to a Frenchman. GordyB 16:32, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Coach flag

message: From all the sources I found, I think Georgia is still a third tier rugby union nation.81.193.220.58 (talk) 16:41, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Second or Third Tier ? 

message: This is highly dubious in the first place, and considering that the article used to source it is dated after revisions which include it, I'd say this is another case of the BBC cribbing nonsense from WP. If a better source can be found this can go back in. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 18:20, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I added it, it was commonly said in the British media at the time (including the BBC). It was taken from a copy of Rugby World that I had (and have subsequently thrown away). This is almost certainly not a case of a lazy hack copying from Wikipedia.GordyB (talk) 20:29, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Here are two articles from 2003 that mention this: , . Korg (talk) 21:52, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Wow. Well, if that's the case then I suppose this is worth reincluding. Still, it might be worth investigating if these five-year-old figures are still current. (and whether "eight rugby pitches" literally means what it says; there are more than that in my home town.) Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 08:45, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "only eight rugby pitches" 

message: What win? What competition?--Dixtosa (talk) 12:50, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Best result-one win 
Talk:Jorge Porcel

message: I have added sections and an obituary. Capitalistroadster 20:35, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Edits
Talk:Golden Lions

message: The history section seems to stop at 2007. We should move on to include their recent history and the coming Lions match. Anyone with knowledge of the team could augment this area nicely. --Cougzie (talk) 15:04, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Eastern Province Elephants

message: * 2 errors: 1 - the infobox refers to "club information". It is not a club, it is a rugby union. 2 - in the article "rugby union" links to the game. There should be a seperate article for the concept. 196.215.18.105 (talk) 14:13, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Errors=
Talk:Worcester Warriors

message: This reads to much like a fansite. If you are the gentleman (or lady) with an IP address and no sign in name, then thank you very much for your contribution. It is very difficult to find info on Worcester Rugby on the internet, but could you please read NPOV.GordyB 21:23, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: POV bias

message: Worcesters women players are frequently international winners as well ... but no mention of them here Victuallers (talk) 15:42, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Women

message: When I was looking for details on Worcester RFC I'm forwarded to this page.
Are the current Worcester RFC one and the same?
If so they're not mentioned at all. The article suggests that the club simply disappeared.
If not, then I shouldn't be redirected here when searching for "Worcester RFC".
http://worcesterrfc.rfu.club/ KenSharp (talk) 22:03, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  Worcester RFC split away from the Warriors only recently. I think 2016. So the article probably hasn't been updated since. The grassroots Worcester RFC wouldn't be considered a generally notable club for its own article I think. Unlike Wasps or Gosforth it didn't really achieve anything notable in the amateur era, and unlike Sale F.C. are not notable as a new entity.  If you wanted to edit the article to add a section on the split and change the re-direct to that section I think that would be entirely appropriate.Skeene88 (talk) 12:26, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Worcester RFC
Talk:European Challenge Cup

message: I think this part should be more developed, since this tourmanent seems more opened to teams outside the Six Nations then the Heineken Cup.Mistico (talk) 22:36, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposals of Enlargement

message: This should be mencioned, if there are any current proposals for the return of Scottish teams, even semi-professional.85.240.23.57 (talk) 17:30, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Return of Teams from Scotland

message: The entry refers the possibility of the entrance of teams from Germany and Russia, in particular, at the European Challenge Cup, but they will not be joining for the 2011/12 edition. What is the current state of the proposal of expanding the competition to other countries for now? I didn't find any reference to this at the official site of the European Challenge Cup.Mistico (talk) 00:23, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion Proposals
Talk:RC Toulonnais

message: Currently the section Emblem refers to Félix Meyol, previously unmentioned, along with the date of 1921, and only in the following section Stadium is there an explanation of who he was and how he relates to the club, with a date of 1920. I propose that these two sections be swapped, so that both the dates and the references to Meyol make more temporal and narrative sense. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 2.121.162.83 (talk) 08:54, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two sections out of order?
Talk:Seán Sherwin

message: Does anyone have any verifiable information on whether this Seán Sherwin who joined Kevin Boland in Aontacht Éireann is the same person as the other Seán Sherwin who was later National Organiser of Fianna Fáil, and whose attendance at Kevin Boland's funeral was noted in the Irish Independent?
There is a lot of interesting material on the other Seán Sherwin:
*A libel case against the Sunday Independent Newspaper
*FF organiser awarded just £250 in funds plea libel case
....
--BrownHairedGirl (talk • contribs) 20:41, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The same person?
Talk:Rugby union in England

message: Macho ? Ddfree 17:15, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[England women's national rugby union team]] 

message: I removed this as stated in the edit summary as by definition the first rugby match would have been an all_Rugby school affair. If the anonymous editor has a citation then an amended form of this edit can be added to the article as the first game played by non-Rugby schoolboys is notable.GordyB 16:16, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference to first game

message: Does anyone know exactly how many professional teams there are in England? Obviously there's the Guiness Premiership, but I was wondering how many below this level are professional? It might be an idea for the article to mention this number, and compare it to other countries in Europe and around the world. Lord Cornwallis (talk) 00:43, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There are plans to reduce the size of National League one and make it full time professional.GordyB (talk) 16:05, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Proffesional Teams

message: in the intro, it is stated that it is a popular myth, etc. but there is no mention of why this is a popular myth nor why it is a myth and not a fact. this needs to be explained and cited, or else removed, given an encyclopaedia is not a collection of myths nor trivia. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 13:58, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  origins of the game 

message: The word "Women" does not appear in this article (except in the info box), so should it be renamed Men's rugby union in England or amended to include mention of the Women's game ? - Ânes-pur-sàng (talk) 07:01, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Women