lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Troy Rutter

message: Okay, Troy Rutter is on the IMDB and has a small list of Hollywood credits, a book (available at brick and mortar bookstores and Amazon and stuff), among other things. He was already mentioned by name on the Bab5 page so I started a stub here. If someone can format this page a bit and clean it up, I can dig up and fill out other information (age, etc.) and categories. --Allen Huffman 04:56, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: (Reference to public address system page heard at a grocery store when there is a spill in a certain isle.) Okay, I haven't done a very good job formatting or making things properly.  If I could figure out how I "requested a page to be made" for another topic earlier, I would have done that and let someone else do the heavy lifting, but I guess I can pitch in.  But... Is it easier to clean up after a newbie than do it all yourself? --Allen Huffman 05:05, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean up in isle three...
Talk:Mojo (sauce)

message: This articles needs references to cite Wasakaka, which is quite different, as a kind of mojo. Also, mojo can not be made from "almost anything" as the key ingredients are pretty well defined. I propose that these recipes would be defined into a new section called "variations". --Teknad (talk) 14:24, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Mexican mojo variants also need to be included as well. In Mexico, mojo contains chipotle and/or jalapeno peppers. 71.168.230.90 (talk) 17:30, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mojo variations
Talk:Olla podrida

message: I have edited the Galician reference to this typical Castilian dish. Please, note that the original article still says that this is a Spanish dish from Burgos. Burgos is not in Galicia, but in Castile (Spain). Please, go to the Spanish Wikipedia entry about this dish for further reference: http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olla_podrida.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dulaman (talk • contribs) 17:24, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Olla podrida is not definitively a Galician dish 

message: Worth reading: http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/005359.html 98.115.255.240 (talk) 13:32, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Probably NOT originally "poderida" 

message: Podriða is closer to it, but it's not ð  but a devoiced d Athanasius V (talk) 20:00, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  IPA
Talk:Tarta de Santiago

message: I can find no trace of evidence for cake being used as a sort of ad hoc armour. Any connection between almendra and the phrase 'an armoured vehicle' is obviously silly. Almond, almendra and so on is Latin amygdala, Classical Greek ἀμυγδάλη, armour is Lat. armatura, from arma. As far as I can tell, the Spaniards would say "carro blindado" for an armoured car in any case (and Rommel might have spoken of a Panzerkampfwagen or Panzer for short. 
I suspect strongly this is innocent enough April-Fool's-Day type ragging, but ought to go. It's rather wittily written but it probably ought to go. 
In vague defence,  the German encyclopaedia Brockhaus has a joke entry on the Nasobem, a reference to a poem by Morgenstern and Pschyrembel's Clinical Dictionary has a joke entry on the Petrophaga lorioti, the Stone Louse of a skit by Loriot. So at least in Germany there is precedent for joke entries in good encyclopaedias.
Judgement call?  As I am not a user I do not have the authority to edit. Patrick Gray, near Tongue, Sutherland, Scotland.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C6:C089:E101:BD03:DD31:402C:45C6 (talk) 19:14, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Good catch, thanks! Unint (talk) 11:57, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rommel, Cake Armour and bad etymology 

message: The addition of the following was the sole contribution of an anon user in 2010.I'm deleting as it's impossible to find any online references to such and event and I'm of the view that it's a piece of tame vandalism.--FDent (talk) 15:38, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  World Baked Goods competition ??
Talk:Brazilianite

message: The edits of this page were prepared by Judy Machado for the course GEOL 3370, Dr. Jonathan Snow at the University of Houston.  Judymachado27 (talk) 04:30, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Bubble Bobble Evolution

message: Done. --Addict 2006 15:56, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture

message: Done. Just need to figure out how to put flags for release dates. --Addict 2006 15:57, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox

message: It's still known as Bubble Bobble Evolution in Europe. Source: Amazon.co.uk However, if someone can prove me wrong, feel free to provide evidence. --BPM (talk) 04:00, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a European Revolution.
Talk:Los Millares

message: Is it a "town"? What do excavators say? Judging by the reconstruction, the architecture looks undifferentiated, no visible zoning except for the different levels, no streets, co communal installations apart from the round kilns... More of a VILLAGE than a town. Does a sophisticated defensive wall make a village into a town? Honest question. ArmindenArminden (talk) 09:47, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Town? 

message: The original file is captioned "painting", here it says "model". Did anyone see it personally? How reliable and "official" is it, i.e. is it vetted by archaeologists? ArmindenArminden (talk) 09:48, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reconstruction: what is it? 
Talk:Spanish Renaissance architecture

message: Hello, I found this article via the "random article" server. It appears to have a single reference, but no inline citations. That's why I added the two relevant templates - no citations and one source. Curdigirl (talk) 21:19, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  One Source 

message: — Assignment last updated by Mpalomo1 (talk) 22:35, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Architectural History
Talk:United States Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution

message: Searching senate.gov, I find mention of the longer name United States Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights and Human Rights, but not of the shorter name United States Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution.  I see that the article has undergone some changes between those two names.  What is the correct name, and how can the name be verified?CountMacula (talk) 16:19, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The Judiciary committee calls it the shorter name:  https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/about/subcommittees Zsrocks04 (talk) 16:33, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the proper name of this subcommittee?
Talk:Liceu

message: Something else could be said about the (perceived) clsss-exclusivity of the pre-fire theatre.
Besides, I watched a former Flamenco dancer (forgot the name, she is heading some ballet or institution in Andalusia already in her 50s or 60s) who quoted Antonio Gades's criticism that the Liceu would stage horses before Flamenco. Apparently, the opera productions had included horses and other exotic props but no Flamenco.
--Error 22:06, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Though, as an aside, Maria Tallchief, probably the greatest dancer of the New York City Ballet in that era happened to be a Native American. But her dancing was entirely classical. - Jmabel | Talk 06:25, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Flamenco

message: From the lead: "one of the most relevant opera houses in Spain." Relevant to what? Seems to me an ill-chosen word, to the point where I don't know what this means to convey. - Jmabel | Talk 06:22, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, I just removed a similar (though more to the point) sentence from the lead: "It is one of the world's finest and biggest stage and acoustic settings for opera." This may or may not be true; it needs sourcing either way. I removed it to talk rather than simply adding a fact tag because of the blatant POV. Recognizance (talk) 20:04, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Most relevant" 

message: The theater's capacity is quoted at various points. In the lead it is said that it was the largest opera house in Europe. This is stated later as well but a different capacity is given. If both figures are right when did it change? -perhaps after the first fire or another refit. If one of the figures is wrong, which one Spinney Hill (talk) 18:04, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capacity
Talk:Enrique

message: Is it worth mentioning names like Ricky, given that it is a common nickname for Enrique?
In my head, Enrique is related to Richard since both names often use the same nicknames, even if the etymological root of the name isn't the same.
Probably not worth adding but thought I'd throw it out there for discussion.
-KaJunl (talk) 13:27, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Erasing an article's Talk Page, as you did to Talk:Enrique is considered vandalism of the encyclopedia. Please don't do it again. -- Alexf(talk) 22:08, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rick, Ricky?
Talk:Jacin

message: The spanish name is Jacinta(female) or Jacinto(male), like the flower named after the Hyacinth from Greek mythology. 
Jacin must be a diminutive for jacinta, but not a name, spanish name at least.
Jason, or Jasón in spanish, is another myth and a diferent name.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Joe Satana (talk • contribs) 16:46, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jacin-ta
Talk:Oak Lake, Manitoba

message: Where exactly are more references needed, I am from Oak Lake and I'll do my best to provide the necessary references.
Delox 05:20, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References needed
Talk:Space Station Tycoon

message: I heard that this game has been canceled during development; they mentioned it in an episode of the Wii Cast.  Can anyone confirm this? 142.55.138.52 15:17, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I too have an issue confirming this, about 15 years following your comment. Certainly it was presumably cancelled, but I found no source definitively saying it was. Mbrickn (talk) 07:53, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Cancelled?
Talk:Alfonso, Prince of Asturias (1453–1468)

message: The revolt of the prince of Austerias against his brother may have ended by his murder at the instigation of Henry IV. Ericl 20:44, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The Murder of Alfonso XII

message: Are you sure he was born in Tordesillas? There is some evidence that he, like his sister, was born in Madrigal de las Altas Torres.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Koppchen (talk • contribs) 10:45, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tordesillas 

message: Am I missing something? I found one book Medieval Iberia: An Encyclopedia calling him "Alfonso the Innocent". How about Alfonso of Castile, Prince of Asturias to disambuate between the other Princes.--The Emperor's New Spy (talk) 03:52, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: No, that's about it. On the other hand, how many encyclopedias have an entry for him in the first place? "Alfonso el Inocente" is quite common - but the results are in Castilian, of course. "Alfonso of Castile, Prince of Asturias" is definitely better than the present title. Surtsicna (talk) 08:57, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alfonso the Innocent
Talk:Cosme Damián Churruca

message: Multiple issues with this entry.  According to the account of the battle, Churruca did not die on the quarter deck but below, his leg was not ripped off by a cannon ball but badly hurt by one, his 2nd in command was already dead before he died, and the casualties are wrong.  100 killed, 150 wounded.69.66.250.189 (talk)   — Preceding undated comment added 22:55, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Enrique O'Donnell, Conde de La Bisbal

message: PLEASE NOTE: Henry O'Donnell and Joseph O'Donnell are not the same person! They are brothers. If you do not believe me then please see Charles Oman's History of the Peninsular War: Vol. IV and look in the index. Djmaschek (talk) 04:21, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment 

message: I don't understand (a) why this page has been renamed several times and (b) why a name is used that would be unfamiliar to English-language readers. In English-language histories, this able general is named Henry O'Donnell. Djmaschek (talk) 01:27, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Henry O'Donnell 

message: Are you sure  that this General and Joseph O'Donnell (younger)  are two different people?--Apr1 (talk) 15:15, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Joseph O'Donnell (younger)]] 

message: A contemporary French account published in 1816 states:
*.
Are we sure that EB1911 has the name correct as "Conde de La Bisba" rather than "le comte  d'Abisbal" (Count of Abisbal)? -- PBS (talk) 19:27, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Le comte  d'Abisbal
Talk:Hidalgo (nobility)

message: "the Romans, Visigoths Arabs and Cantabrians had all failed to conquer them, so they preserved their freedom, sovereignty and pre-Roman culture, beliefs and language longer than the rest of the Iberian peninsula.[14]" 
The reference given by no means deals with anything related to that phrase, pretty much the opposite, it is about the hidalguia in Cantabria. The basques surrendered to the roman empire without any resistance, whereas Cantabria was the last part of the Iberian peninsula that fell to it. With reference to the Visigoths, the Basques were part of the Duchy of Cantabria, with the same status as the rest in the duchy. There wasn't any war among Basques and Cantabrians in history, yet Cantabrians made historical raids against the Roman empire, which the Basques where part of.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.107.5.67 (talk) 08:48, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The earliest documentation of the term is from the 12th century, not the 7th, as noted in Joan Corominas extensive etymological dictionary (cited in the article as it now stands). The theories that it really is from "hijo de godo" or "itálico" are often bandied about, but I see no references, and the fact that it's the unsourced claim in the Spanish article does not make it so. Perhaps there were analogues to the hidalguía under the Visigoths, but again I see it in no sources. The hidalguía is a late medieval development.TriniMuñoz (talk) 19:39, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: As 217.127.191.232 said,  natives of Biscay were "hidalgos" only if they could prove "clean blood". But not only people of Biscay, also of Gipuzcoa (and lesser extent of Álava and Navarre). Here some information:
:The Hidalguía Universal (universal nobility, a proclamation that meant that anyone born in Bizcaia was of noble birth, however lowly they were), which was associated with a solar conocido (known ancestral home) formed a key part of Gipuzcoan society under the Old Regime. Fundamentally, it declared anyone from a caserío or ancestral domain to be of noble birth and therefore all their descendants were, according the phrase coined at the time, “free of any evil blood such as Jewish, Muslim or any other sect condemned by the Holy Office of the Inquisition”.
Can somebody change that info? Thanks! (contact)--Aazkasle (talk) 20:16, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Other basque people were also born "hidalgo"
Talk:Joe McDoakes

message: This article was not very comprehensive to me in presenting the subject, it is referenced, but the majority of them are for the cast and crew section.  Consider expanding the history a bit, and removing some OR statement and adding references.  You may also want to peer review it to flesh out more problems.  DoomsDay349 01:13, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Failed GA

message: Just for the record, I've removed this sentence:  The Joe McDoakes films were unique in that they were the only one-reel (10-minute) live-action comedies on the market, making them convenient fillers on moviehouse bills.  They certainly weren't the only Hollywood live-action one-reelers in production -- MGM's Pete Smith Specialties and Columbia's Three Stooges were other examples produced in these same years.  --Lockley (talk) 05:38, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  removed sentence 
Talk:Juan Manuel

message: I tried to clean up the original text into something that sounded less like a bad mechanical translation.  Unfortunately the most I know about the Duke is what I've gleaned from reading El Conde Lucanor, and I don't know where this text was taken from, so it's spotty quality at best.  Expert help desperately needed.  Shouriki 01:31, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  General cleanup 

message: The Spanish wiki states that Juan Manuel inherited the Grand Lordship of Villena and bears the title of Prince, Duke and Lord of Villena, whereas the Catalan wiki states that he is the Lord of Escalona, Peñafiel and Villena.  What precisely was his proper title(s), what was the title he was best known by, and why is this English wiki article specifically titled "..., Duke of Peñafiel"? o (talk) 06:31, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Juan Manuel had a big number of titles, as general in medieval nobility. He was Duke of Peñafiel (of course) and also Lord of Escalona and Prince of Villena, which means he was also Lord of all the towns which where included in the Seigneury of Villena. In Spanish he is known just as 'Don Juan Manuel' and in Catalan as 'Joan Manuel de Castella', and I think that the addition of 'Duke of Peñafiel' was in order to avoid ambiguity. However, that was not the more relevant title, as being Prince of Villena is not just a higher rank but it suposed to rule one of the biggest feudal states in medieval Spain. Qoan (tell me!) 12:03, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title? 

message: Hey guys, I suggest changing the name of the wiki article to Don Juan Manuel, which is the equivalent in several other languages (and how his modern editions are published), or to Juan Manuel. What do you think?Johannesemmanuelis (talk) 02:25, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move 

message: The Spanish versions of the titles of his works should be changed to the original Old Spanish versions.
El conde Lucanor however is probably a later title.
--Error (talk) 20:32, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spanish titles
Talk:Pedro Caro Sureda, 3rd Marquis of La Romana

message: There is a link to the Battle of Salamanca in the External Links. La Romana was dead by July 1812. It is recommended that the link be removed. Djmaschek (talk) 02:37, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment about External Link 

message: From the paragraph beginning with the Peninsular War breaking out, it would be most helpful to add the year after the day and month. Nor is it clear if the 6,000 soldiers left to him are from Blake's army or his own men rescued from the Baltic defenses on RN ships, or the amorphous Army of Galicia (linked to an article on the history of the region of Spain and not the army itself). One with access to the original sources could perhaps makes the small changes so this reads more clearly.  --Prairieplant (talk) 08:16, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  add years to dates, for less confusion in text
Talk:Prince of Belmonte

message: Prince or Princess? Were they not sure if the first prince was a man or woman? Also, shouldn't there be an of in there? The page should probably be moved to Prince of Belmonte, it is understood that when a woman holds a title it becomes the feminine.
[tk] XANDERLIPTAK 22:59, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: or? Do you have doubts? --Attilios (talk) 09:02, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Totally stupid article
Talk:Principalía

message: For Johnmperry:
Thanks for the excellent fotenote system that you have contributed to make this article look more scientific. Very good job. However, I have undone your edits of the article's layout since the result made a lot of vacant spaces. Do not worry if the illustration of the silver-inlaid salakot is in the photo gallery. It need not be in the sub-section on Class Symbols. What is more important is to have a good layout. Thanks again. --94.83.253.145 (talk) 20:11, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Layout and footnote system 

message: The following addition to the article is very interesting. However, due to lack of references, I temporarily transferred it here for discussion, until such a time that enough citations would make it suitable to be included in the article. Thanks for the one who made the research:--TLS MMM (talk) 20:18, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional section without references. 

message: This section was ommitted. This could be created as another page. To put it in this article would imply an infinite list of names that require verifications. 
A similar case of the same aim could be cited for the article Datu. --Humadapnon (talk) 17:43, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Principalia Names 

message: I would like to see this article develop more of the transformation of the principalia after the end of Spanish rule.  Obviously they didn't just curl up in a corner and stay quiet.  I imagine their first aim was always self-preservation (like the ruling communist party in China) with consideration of "the people" a long way distant.  
When the Americans arrived, it seems like they installed the same principales as mayor rather than gobernadorcillos, etc.  
To what extent did the principales form the freemasons, and vice versa?  And to what extent did the same principales become among the Political dynasties in the Philippines?
John of Cromer in China Philippines (talk) mytime= Tue 12:20, wikitime=  04:20, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  and then what? 

message: User:Rathfelder, 
In response to your position, I ask you to present convincing reasons why you are trying to remove the previous categorizations of the Principalia. The current categorizations are based on self-evident facts provided by published reference materials on history used in the article.
You must present more convincing historical refence materials to prove of the contrary, before removing the current categorizations. 
--Sulbud (talk) 10:52, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Rathfelder is correct here as it is a matter of categorization practice. With the article in the country-specific :Category:Filipino nobility, of which it is a subtopic, higher-level categories such as :Category:Asian nobility and :Category:Nobility are overbroad and redundant and should not also be applied to this article. Restoring those category tags here again would be against consensus-supported guidelines on categorization, and constitute WP:EDITWARRING. postdlf (talk) 15:40, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Categorization
Talk:Rafael Merry del Val

message: Merry del Val and Cardinal Merry del Val would be a good idea. --90.236.104.43 (talk) 09:42, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Creating redirects 

message: As the mentioned book has appeared in 1902, it does not have an ISBN. The ISBN system was created around 1970 only. (There seems to be a facsimile edition under the  by Book on Demand Ltd.; however, that is not the original edition, so it would be incorrect to add this ISBN to the original edition.) Therefore, I propose to remove the “lacking ISBN” template. -- David N. Jansen (talk) 12:19, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  ISBN is not missing, but does not exist 