lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Rock n Roll Jesus

message: This article had a section called "sound," but I removed it.  While this may seem like a drastic measure, the section read like a poorly written review rather than an encyclopedic article; it was full of run-on sentences and subjective statements.  Yes, there were also some factual statements describing the musical styles of each song, but even this information was relayed in a form that read almost like an advertisement.  The whole thing smakced of original research, and in any case, subjective statements have no place in an encyclopedia article.  Minaker 10:48, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: removing the "sound" section

message: Please review Wikipedia's copyright policy prior to adding material. Cutting and pasting from another site (billboard.com, ticketwood.com, rolling stone) is not allowed. If you wish to include the material you read there, you'll need to summarize, paraphrase, condense, (see the following: Cite your sources, Manual of style, Layout guide, First article, Article development and How to edit.
I have removed the following copyright violation material, please feel free to add it back in using the above guidelines. Ariel♥Gold 23:52, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright Policy

message: Congratulations and great job for cleaning up the copyright issues, and putting it into "Wikipedia" format! It looks much like the rest of the albums on the "Upcoming Releases list" now! Congrats! Ariel♥Gold 17:46, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Great job! 

message: This article needs some major work.... writing style/grammar is bad, lots of formatting fixes required, song titles should be quoted, etc., etc., reviews properly placed inside the album infobox.... - eo 15:21, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've done what I can to clean up the article and make it look like an actual Wikipedia article--removing spelling errors, non-NPOV statements, wikifying it, and adding references.  There may be a bit more work necessary to make it complete, but it doesn't look horrible now.  --CWSensationt 22:17, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup tag
Talk:Ibrahima Fall

message: In looking for info on Ibrahima Fall, the prominent Senegalese politician and 2012 Presidential candidate, I discovered that Ibrahima Fall the religious leader holds the title Ibrahima Fall.  I would suggest this combination of common names is shifted to a disambiguation page, with Ibrahima Fall (religious leader) and Ibrahima Fall (politician) as the first two (of likely many more) links.
I would appreciate any input at this point before any changes are made. T L Miles (talk) 19:11, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dasambiguation title may be needed 
Talk:Talibes

message: This needs some major editing, but I think there are parts which can be saved.  Street kids in Dakar are known as Talibes, and it's an outgrowth of traditional religious leaders and students living by alms.  But the word (it's just Arabic for Students) means everything from Madrassa students, to adult followers of specific teachers, sects, to students (religious and secular) to the Taliban in central asia.  So this needs to be re-written as West African (especially Dakar/Bamako) specific usage, and be about BOTH religious students, and street kids, both where they intersect and where they do not.  There are plenty of religious students (or followers of Marabouts) who are not children and/or do not beg.  As there are plenty of homeless Dakar kids who are not students.
Also, this article was written by some Christian missionary who seems to want to see all  (Muslim) religious teachers as exploiters.  Not only non-encyclopedic but also just wrong.T L Miles (talk) 18:36, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup goals
Talk:Niangara free-tailed bat

message: I think that this article should now be a start class as it fulfills all the required criteria (listed on the Bats task force page) and also contains all the information I could find on this particular species.
TheLordOfWikis (talk) 10:42, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: , I agree, thanks for the improvements! Enwebb (talk) 03:45, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Think that this is a Start
Talk:Anglican Diocese of Manchester

message: There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Anglican Diocese of Birmingham - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 21:41, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Not moved. No supporting comments, will re-open as a multiple move request including other dioceses metioned in discussion (non-admin closure) A.D.Hope (talk) 13:40, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Anglican Diocese of Manchester →  – The article's current name disambiguates it from the Roman Catholic Diocese of Manchester, which is located in New Hampshire, USA. My concern is that the current title implies that there is a Roman Catholic diocese of Manchester in the UK, when in reality the diocese of Salford covers the city. Disambiguating by location rather than Christian denomination makes it clearer that only one UK diocese is named after Manchester.
I've opted for 'Manchester (United Kingdom)' over 'Manchester, United Kingdom' as although the name of the diocese includes 'Manchester' it's an organisation rather than a place name. A.D.Hope (talk) 13:01, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

text: Comment – I'd prefer "England" as it is the Church of England, plus shorter. But neutral overall, as the current is WP:NATURALDAB. DankJae 23:43, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Either "England" or "United Kingdom" works, and I can't say I have a very strong preference either way. A.D.Hope (talk) 00:04, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 21 December 2023
Talk:Madagascar sucker-footed bat

message: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Asyuran/sandbox/My_sandbox
I have added some information to the article after reading some research papers. It's about the bats' habitat and diet. 
There is a link to the sandbox. Asyuran (talk) 21:28, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bangorian Controversy

message: I'm confused about the positions taken in this debate. My understanding is that the Hoadlian, and the Whiggis, view in general, was that of erastianism: not power flowing up from the people, but supreme ecclesiastical prerogative invested in the sovereign at the expense of the clergy and any independence or relatively autonomous jurisdiction claimed by the clergy. I guess erastianism could be interpreted in various ways (whether civil supremacy over the church applied to the crown, or to the crown-in-parliament). But the political implications of the erastian party, if I'm not mistaken, was to assert magisterial authority at the expense of bishops and the clergy--as such it seems less a diminution of the royal prerogative and more an assertion of civil authority over clerical. The fallout of the controversy led to the permanent preroging of convocation after all. Hoadly himself spoke of the Goerge I as "law-giver" on the order of Moses, justifying his right to sideline clerical authority and claim more exclusive power over religious matters.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.132.21.77 (talk) 19:35, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: confused
Talk:Zainab al-Ghazali

message: Not very relevant. Sounds like a meeting in some extremist society of mutual praise. Propaganda and bias i. m. h. o.
She's was a very major figure, whether you agree with her or not (I don't). I have updated and corrected it somewhat. Zainab/zaynab al-G are the same person so it should be merged. - rosabibi
Ok, I've removed biased material and added more material with well-recognised references. I'm crap at formatting however so it looks weird and I don't know how to fix it. Would be grateful if someone could help. - rosabibi  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rosabibi (talk • contribs) 22:22, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Boat boy

message: Let's look at google:
*boat girl
or 
*boat bearer
Simple enough. -- SECisek 02:27, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair play, I will add boat girl back.  The article cited on the page in the reference section uses "boat bearer". I have never heard Boat person in use.  Perhaps it is the Atlantic as bearer IS in common use over here.  What fun! -- SECisek 05:46, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Boat girl versus boat bearer
Talk:Small-toothed fruit bat

message: They are presented in the study : Bergmans, W., & Rozendaal, F. G. (1988). Notes on collections of fruit bats from Sulawesi and some off-lying islands (Mammalia, Megachiroptera). Zoologische Verhandelingen, 248(1), 1-74. (Look for Neopteryx frosti info on pages 21 thru 29). 
I suggest porting attention to table 3 : "Table 3. Measurements and weights of Neopteryx frosti Hayman, 1946. Those of the holotype are cited from the original description."
This study is available to read from google scholar.
Gimly24 (talk) 20:42, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weight of specimens and holotypes measurements.
Talk:The Human Resource

message: I've added this page along with slightly modifying The Dungeonmaster's Guide in order to match it. Bognan72 00:18, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Journey: The Adventures of Wolverine MacAlistaire

message: Was there really a second issue published of this title, or were there just the two variant printings of the first issue, one with brown ink, one with black ink? Rick Norwood (talk) 17:14, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the brown ink first issue was Journey:Wardrums #1--Nickpheas (talk) 20:57, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Journey: Wardrums 
Talk:Cambridge Camden Society

message: Is there any evidence that Pugin was "unequivocally condemned for his Roman Catholicism"  by the Ecclesiologist? There seems to be a certain  disappointment that his buildings didn't live up to his rhetoric, but  this seems more like just criticism than prejudice. Ruskinmonkey (talk) 20:11, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pugin 
Talk:Dark tube-nosed fruit bat

message: I noticed that references differ on the validity of this taxon.  ITIS seems to rely on data from 2000 or so, and classifies this as a separate species from Broad-striped tube-nosed fruit bat, while the more recent IUCN listing makes them synonymous.  I suspect there was a reworking of these species sometime between 2000 and 2008, but I have not been able to locate it nor verify its general acceptance.  If anyone has further information, clarifying it in the article would be appreciated. --TeaDrinker (talk) 14:47, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Synonymy with [[Broad-striped tube-nosed fruit bat]] 
Talk:List of Commonwealth organisations

message: I will note here that this phrase does not appear, by Google search, to be in use in reference to the organisations associated with the Commonwealth, which are rather referred to as Commonwealth organisations, Commonwealth Accredited Organisations or Accredited Commonwealth Organisations. I hope to rework this article at some point as such, but have no objection to another editor doing this sooner. thorpewilliam (talk) 06:08, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Usage of term "Commonwealth Family"
Talk:Twenty Five (The West Wing)

message: In The Dogs of War and Jefferson Lives, the Secretary of State is Lewis Berryhill, played by William Devane.  However, in the cabinet vote on the 25th Amendment in this episode, the Secretary of State's voice is clearly not that of Devane. Mohrr 00:26, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Chancery Court of York

message: There are several civil courts in the United States that are called "Chancery Court" or, collectively, "Chancery Courts."  They are listed in  Court of Chancery (disambiguation).
Chancery Court is also listed in that disambiguation page.  I took the liberty of moving its entry to the top line of the page and reworking the page so that the terms "Court of Chancery" and "Chancery Court" have equal status on the disambiguation page.  That is, "ABC Court of Chancery" and "XYZ Chancery Court" will be listed together if they fall in the same grouping.  Currently, there are two groupings:  [existing/active] civil courts and "former civil courts."  Any ecclesiastical courts with these names which have Wikipedia articles should be in their own section.
Proposal:
* Move Chancery Court to Chancery Court of York over the existing redirect.
* Retarget the resulting redirect at Chancery Court to Court of Chancery (disambiguation).
This discussion will be advertised at the following venues and possibly others:
* The talk pages of Court of Chancery (disambiguation) and Court of Chancery.
* Wikipedia talk:Redirects for discussion
davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 20:18, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recommend moving to [[Chancery Court of York]] and making this a redirect to [[Court of Chancery (disambiguation)]]
Talk:Church Commissioners

message: I propose that Church Estates Commissioners be merged into Church Commissioners. I think that the content in the Church Estates Commissioners article can easily be explained in the context of Church Commissioners, and the Church Commissioners article is of a reasonable size that the merging of Church Estates Commissioners will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. Davidkinnen (talk) 09:01, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: An unlikely name. 94.30.84.71 (talk) 13:23, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jermey Clack
Talk:List of programs broadcast by TLC

message: Please add more information, especially on early programming. 53180 00:40, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 2007 comment

message: Um, hello? I thought it was a show called Mystery Diagnosis.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.148.16.209 (talk) 08:07, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Also Happily Divorced. Loved that. 2A02:C7C:2E38:7100:50B4:1610:DE65:F713 (talk) 22:12, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  missing a show 

message: Noticed that in the "Reruns of Original Programming" sub-section under the "Current Programming" section that Counting On was included in that section (vs. "First-run original programming"). I remember seeing some speculation that TLC had not renewed "Counting On" even before the current situation with Josh Duggar surfacing; but had not heard anything whatsoever on its fate and was curious if anyone knew something more specific on the rationale for the decision. WAVY 10 Fan (talk) 22:16, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Counting On]] in the Reruns of Original Programming sub-section
Talk:Reformed Evangelical Anglican Church of South Africa

message: It would be interesting to show if there have been any proposals for the Church of England in South Africa, which follows a very Reformed kind of orthodox Anglicanism, to seek any form of affiliation with the Anglican Communion.Mistico (talk) 23:23, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible Admission at the Anglican Communion

message: The denomination has changed its name, and so this page probably needs to be moved. But I'm not sure whether it should be Reformed Evangelical Anglican Church of South Africa or REACH–SA. StAnselm (talk) 20:41, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Officially it looks as if they have yet to formalise the change. I think spelt out first then acronym - Reformed Evangelical Anglican Church of South Africa (REACH–SA). Paul foord (talk) 10:46, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe it was voted on at the 2012 Synod, and ratified at the 2013 Synod. It has changed on the website. StAnselm (talk) 11:25, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  New name
Talk:Communion of Evangelical Episcopal Churches

message: Hello, I have engaged  about his/her recent edits to this article and Independent Catholicism. I think that the present citations are unsuitable to sustain claims of links to the Independent Catholic movement, let alone nebulous things such as "a good relationship with Pope Francis". 2600:8800:1880:9A3:5604:A6FF:FE38:4B26 (talk) 20:51, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Due to continuing disruption, I have referred the matter to WP:RFPP for temporary semi-protection. 2600:8800:1880:9A3:5604:A6FF:FE38:4B26 (talk) 17:49, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Verifiability of claims
Talk:Faculty Office

message: I have removed some inaccurate and unreferenced content, removed some content which was merely repetitious, and provided references to what remains.
I am unsure whether further detail of the three principal jurisdictions of the Faculty Office needs to be set out here. There are links to Lambeth Degree and Notary public. The content of these seems to me to be accurate. One needs to trawl through other jurisdictions to find the content on notaries public in England and Wales, but what is there seems detailed and accurate. The content for special marriage licences, on the marriage licence page is, in my view, poor and inaccurate. I shall see if I can revise it. It needs to be noted that a special licence (issued by the Faculty Office) is considerably more wide-ranging than a common marriage licence (issued by the relevant Diocesan Registry). I have emphasised this distinction between the two in some referenced content that I have put in the Structure section of Church of England, as that was confusing the different sorts of marriage licence.
Could someone please put a link so that "Faculty Office" redirects to the Article page. That is what it is generally called. Although the Master of the Faculties can hear disputes, the bulk of the business of the Faculty Office is non-contentious.Ntmr (talk) 12:37, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for tidying up the introduction and changing the name of this Article. I don't feel, however, that "an organisation in English law" quite describes what it is. It is, in fact, quite difficult to define it. Do you think "a regulatory body in English law" would be appropriate? The functions that it performs must seem quite random until one looks at its historical origins. Although it acts mainly as a legal registry, it could (I think) still function as a court: if there was a dispute involving e.g. whether a notary was properly insured or qualified, the matter would be heard by the Master of the Faculties, who would then presumably be sitting as or in "The Court of Faculties". There is a possible analogy in that lawyers refer to grants of representation being made by the "Probate Court" when, in practice, the vast majority of grants issue as non-contentious business from the Probate Registry.Ntmr (talk) 18:19, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Ntmr, Feel free to be bold and make such relatively uncontroversial changes without discussing on the Talk page beforehand. cagliost (talk) 09:13, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revision of article
Talk:Pennington Biomedical Research Center

message: There should be some sort of important discoveries on this. 198.62.89.27 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 20:49, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The Center was criticized for accepting money from Coca-cola.https://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/09/28/coke-spends-lavishly-on-pediatricians-and-dietitians/ 
HLHJ (talk) 03:31, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism
Talk:The Marvelous Misadventures of Flapjack

message: I think someone should change some things of the character list 
Hello, I notice something off with this Wikipedia page, it puts long pointless information about minor characters,and less information about more important characters or recurring characters. For example, Sally Syrup has information about the episodes she was on (“Love bugs” and “the return of Sally Syrup”) than her characteristic (which I don’t blame in my opinion, she’s not a great character) and not much information on Flapjack’s adoptive mother, Bubbie, who is one of the main characters. So I think it should be noted about bubbie’s past of how she met flapjack, not the episode of where Sally was. That’s only one of the episodes. I think it should be changed to talk about the characters than the episodes they appeared on.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:16D0:5410:7451:6CC3:D481:30C6 (talk) 14:48, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Dean of the Arches

message: As List of Deans of Arches? -- SECisek 19:32, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Better to make it give a proper account of the office.Leutha (talk) 12:54, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename

message: Lord Mackay of Clashfern (ed.) (1997) Halsbury's Laws of England, 4th ed. Vol.14, "Ecclesiastical Law", 1273 says this is so and cites Coke and Burn. However, the two lists clearly diverge before Dodson. Anybody have any ideas?Cutler (talk) 21:20, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Identity with Master of the Faculties 

message: His article says he was appointed D of A in 1415. ODNB confirms this:He became dean of the court of arches by 21 February 1414, which explains why he was no longer the examiner-general by June. He was said to be still dean in 1428, but this is impossible.
We have another name currently.  Spicemix (talk) 23:25, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  John Kemp
Talk:Pteropus brunneus

message: , hey! At random, can you see obvious way that I might expand this article? ~ cygnis insignis 15:20, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: , yeah, it's a tough article since there's just the holotype. I think it looks reasonably complete as is, considering how little we know about it. Enwebb (talk) 14:26, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: , thanks for having a look, I'm a shocker for overlooking the obvi and a second pair of eyes is appreciated. It is interesting to me for that reason, a single specimen, a bit macabre when I think about it. ~ cygnis insignis 14:55, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion
Talk:Central Synagogue (Manhattan)

message: Just wondering about the need (?) for disambiguation?
* Central Synagogue of Aleppo
* Central Synagogue, Sydney
* old Central Synagogue, Moscow in Soviet days = now Moscow Choral Synagogue, correct?
In ictu oculi (talk) 10:42, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Also
* Birmingham Central Synagogue
* Yeshurun Central Synagogue
--ELEKHHT 12:36, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Central Synagogue, New York]]?

message: "After a fire in 1886, the building was restored by Ely Jacques Kahn.[3"
Kind of hard to do if Ely Jacques Kahn was born in 1884. He worked on the synagogue in 1946 according to his own page. 
Angecope (talk) 01:56, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ely Jacques Kahn 

message: For some reason, the NRHP map displays captions in a Slavic language (I think Czech?), so that (for example) Columbus Circle displays as "Kolambus Serkl" and Hell's Kitchen is "Hels Kičen".  The same problem arises on WikiData, and I suspect originates there.  I'm not sure how to fix this, so that the map labels are in English here on en.wiki.  Bernanke's Crossbow (talk) 05:30, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for bringing this up. Re. the map: it is displaying in Serbian due to an OpenStreetMap bug. There is more information about this bug at Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)/Archive 212#Serbian place names displayed on Manhattan maps, :phab:T230013, and :phab:T195318. Basically, the Serbian Latin-script text is overriding other Latin texts including English, and this issue can only be fixed on OpenStreetMap itself. Even more strangely, when looking at the OSM website directly, the neighborhood names are correctly displayed in English; this bug only exists on Wikimedia maps that use OSM data.This has been an issue for at least a month now, and I have no idea how to fix the bug over at OSM, but hopefully this gets resolved soon. Epicgenius (talk) 14:29, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map in 
Czech
 Serbian?