Talk:Paulina Rubio

message: I have changed the word "string" to "ribbon" as in [she], ie, Rubio was asked to cut the "string".Mark Preston 05:55, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Regular English Usage

message: *Keep - Sources added, why someone is deleting the new sources?. I also think the subject is notable in its field . User eddyvirto 09:30,4 april 2007 (UTC)
There is no section for the PAU-LATINA album. It talks about Border Girl and skips to Ananda. ShadowBoxer 07:50, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  What About Pau-Latina? 

message: I added a paragraph in the "Ananda  to present" section relating to Paulina's performance in Oslo, Norway at the Nobel Peace Prize ceremony. PopolVuh! 06:30, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Nobel Prize Gala

message: does any one know the actual sales for Paulina's 1st albums? i have read that La Chica Dorada has sold a little over a million in a magazine and i know for a fact the 24 Kilates has been certified gold in mexico at least.
Can someone please post she recently performed on jay leno show to sing "ni una sola palabra"
becoming only the 2nd artist allowed to sing in spanish.
PAULINO ROBIO SOLD 10 MILLION COPIES??????OH GOD.....THIS IS TOTALLY FALSE...SHE HAS SOLD 13 MILLION.ARE YOU CRAZY?20?ALSO,PLEASE PUT THE SITES WHERE YOU FIND THE INFORMATION THAT YOU GIVE.20 MILLION IS NOT TRUE.HERE WE DONT WRITE WHAT WE LIKE BUT WHAT IS CORRECT,NOT DEPENDANT ON HOW MUCH WE LIKE A SINGER.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.74.126.212 (talk) 09:20, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  SALES 

message: Will not be permitted. All items added must be in accordance with Wikipedia:Verifiability. Ronbo76 08:32, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits without citations to record sales and other facts. . . 

message: Generally, weasel terms are statements that are misleading because they lack the normal substantiations of their truthfulness, as well as the background information against which these statements are made. Weasel terms are the equivalent of spin in the political sphere in British English. Saying that one artist is the best or a generalization like, "it has been decided" without citing a neutral POV veriable source will draw attention to your edits. Wikipedia is not a fansite where unsubstanitated rumors can be written.  Ronbo76 17:05, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Weasel word]]s will be looked at carefully

message: All editors may wish to review my post above this one. To make it easy for you, I wrote:
:It was interesting to see this Paulina Rubio URL on her official website. This is a messageboard there with a link back to this article and its author states, 
::::::"I used Paulina’s Wikipedia article as a reference for most of the album sales figures. It doesn’t list all of them, but it is a start. Here is a link to that article: (Wikipedia link not included.)"
I will not pretend to be an expert on this matter but ask that editors consider this when seeing record sales posts.
:I should add, that the artist is probably not responsible for the messages on her website message board. Ronbo76 17:04, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note to all editors why this article might be receiving anonymous IP edits - her official website message board has a link back to this article 

message: I will discuss with other editors the number one way to cut down on the number of vandal edits - the elimination of album sale numbers. Gold, silver and bronze sales are more easily tracked achievements.  Ronbo76 04:09, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elimination of album sales to improve this article 

message: :Image:Paulinapaulina.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:58, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Paulinapaulina.jpg

message: :Image:Ananda.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 02:22, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Ananda.jpg

message: This section needs significant work: it's out of order, has a number of grammatical errors and there's too many 1-sentence paragraphs.  IKrolm (talk) 07:24, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Gran City Pop

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 15:24, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Paulina Rubio at the 2011 Latin Grammy.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: Every time I make an edition in this article, were Paulina Rubio is known as The Queen Of Latin Pop with at least 15 references all over the world in several languages, this user  revert it, please I request from blocking this user to make any edit to this article, since this user doesn't offer any reason for revert these edits. He just simply erase it. Please help preventing this user  from making any edit to this article.
This are the references where Paulina Rubio is named as the "Queen of Latin Pop":
http://www.teenvogue.com/story/selena-gomez-paulina-rubio-collaboration-2017
http://www.harpersbazaar.com/culture/art-books-music/news/a19621/selena-gomez-paulina-rubio-new-music/
http://perezhilton.com/2016-12-28-selena-gomez-paulina-rubino-new-music
https://books.google.com.mx/books?id=_UeiAgAAQBAJ&pg=PT289&dq=Paulina+Rubio+Queen+Of+Latin+Pop&hl=en&sa=X&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Paulina%20Rubio%20Queen%20Of%20Latin%20Pop&f=false
https://books.google.com.mx/books?id=EL__aCS77e0C&pg=PA263&dq=Paulina+Rubio+reina+del+pop&hl=en&sa=X&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Paulina%20Rubio%20reina%20del%20pop&f=false
http://www.idolator.com/7654159/selena-gomez-recorded-song-with-paulina-rubio
http://www.prosieben.de/stars/news/selena-gomez-nach-rehab-neues-duett-mit-superstar-051183
http://qn.quotidiano.net/2007/06/02/15638-rubio_alza_gonna.shtml
http://www.nrj.fr/artistes/selena-gomez/actus/selena-gomez-va-faire-son-retour-en-musique-avec-paulina-rubio-343659
http://www.billboard.com/articles/columns/latin/6671058/premios-tu-mundo-winners-nicky-jam-daddy-yankee
http://www.telemundo.com/shows/2015/09/17/paulina-rubio-daddy-yankee-reik-y-mas-se-unen-la-lista-de-cantantes-para-la?image=7162676
http://www.europafm.com/noticias/musica/nuevo-duo-paulina-rubio-selena-gomez-haran-colaboracion_201612295864fb100cf211d2a9fefb4a.html
https://books.google.com.mx/books?id=EL__aCS77e0C&pg=PA263&dq=Paulina+Rubio+reina+del+pop&hl=en&sa=X&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Paulina%20Rubio%20reina%20del%20pop&f=false
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D-y9JVaTny8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=96qQjoSpfcc
And in my edition I mention Paulina Rubio is the top-selling mexican artist and  always erase it:
https://books.google.com.mx/books?id=iw4EAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA16&lpg=PA16&dq=paulina+rubio+shakira+biggest+selling+singer&source=bl&ots=lsHh3t5M6G&sig=3lv0wPf03Y43i7ltRhOn3IGYeGc&hl=en&sa=X#v=onepage&q=paulina%20rubio%20shakira%20biggest%20selling%20singer&f=false
:User  has notified about this article in the Spanish Administrators' noticeboard and doesn't proceeds (is a different article). I will answer here:
*He said that I just reverted him without any reason. It's ironic, because I removed some statements on December 12 with a edit summary ("Bias. PEACOCK context. Also, top-selling Mexican female maybe in Nielsen figures (and is not update information)"). But actually he reverted my edition without any reason or at least without making a edit summary since today.
*However, I oppose about the version that he restored. Why?: some references like YouTube not meets the criteria of verifiability. It's a PEACOCK context also, because even artists like Thalía, Shakira or Gloria Estefan have been named with this honorific nickname several decade ago and by international press and more than Paulina Rubio.
*The reference about "top-selling mexican artist" (in United States) is not accurate information now. Since 2008, Thalía has sold more than Paulina Rubio according to Nielsen. Even, I think that she has more certified units.
If you see, there is not vandalism. Contrary, you started reverting without any reason and I explained why this version needs to be delete. Regards, Chrishonduras (Diskussion) 09:18, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: That is more incredible. I just arguing the point about Thalía (ref 2008) vs Rubio (ref 2005) in sales. Who has oldest news?. This is not reason to be a "Thalía fan" or "Paulina Rubio hater". Please Assume good faith. And yet, is realible, is from Billboard.com and they have a section when a reader asked about sales or something from this section. However, you see with a realible source that Rubio is not the best-selling female artist in United States or can you provide a update about this statement, please?. 
Please stop making disruptive editions or you can be blocked. Thanks, Chrishonduras (Diskussion) 16:45, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: So, what's the point about your comments?. This is Paulina Rubio's article, not Thalía's article. You're creating disruptive editions here. And... "top-selling Mexican female pop singer in the market" in which market?, United States?, Worldwide?. Reference said: "according to Nielsen SoundScan, Paulina is -after Shakira- the top selling Latin femela pop artist in the market". Where operates Nielsen SoundScan? for Mexico, Europe or Worldwide? I think that is only for United States/Canada. Doesnt makes sense this statement in the lead or in any part. And at least, in the context that you wrote Queen of Latin Pop is PEACOCK. There is not mention why and I can gave you opposite and a major context for other artists with this nickname. Chrishonduras (Diskussion) 08:17, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism from user {{u|Chrishonduras}} 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:08, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion 

message: She's best known and referred to as "the golden girl" not only as "the queen of latin pop" so it should be included too in the main topic since its one of the most famous characteristics of her. Moonlight Entm (talk) 05:36, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  In the main topic should be golden girl not only queen of pop