lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Grallator

message: Anyone mind if I replace the ichnobox image at some point? The glare can be quite distracting, and I'll be in access of new specimens tomorrow (as well as a hypothetical model we could use...?).
Crimsonraptor | (Contact me) Dumpster dive if you must 01:48, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Go ahead! J. Spencer (talk) 03:03, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added a title to this thread for formatting purposes. Abyssal (talk) 05:21, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, Abyssal. It's the Rutgers Geology Museum, in case anyone was curious. They have a whole trackway of Grallator, so a good one shouldn't be too hard to find :) Crimsonraptor | (Contact me) Dumpster dive if you must 14:32, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

text: I now have two footprint photos, plus the model. Will upload ASAP! Crimsonraptor | (Contact me) Dumpster dive if you must 20:06, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Taxobox image replacement

message: Can we at least make mention to the fact that it's obviously a wastebasket [ichno]taxon?142.176.114.76 (talk) 02:07, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Ichnotaxa are form taxa, not meant to actually represent a certain species, but a certain type of shape or mark of print. You can't have a wastebasket form taxon. Grallator is not supposed to be the name of an animal, it's supposed to be the name of a certain common footprint shape, which could have been made by any number of animals that happen to have similar feet or modes of walking. Dinoguy2 (talk) 13:12, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wastebasket
Talk:Polybutadiene

message: See this diff. jonkerz ♠talk 04:13, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed HTML comments 
Talk:Illinois State Police

message: I'm just wondering what purpose does the "Core Values" section serve in the introduction. It seems unnecessary and more promotional than informative, and it takes up a significant amount of space in the beginning, where I believe it should be a brief overview of the agency. If anything, the core values could be moved down lower in the article. For now, that's what I will do, and I'll await further input from others. Dominik W. 16:14, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question regarding the "Core Values" section in the introduction. 

message: Can one of you IP anons explain what your issue is with including Lieutenant Rich Kozik in the list? His death is cited as "on duty". Why do you guys keep removing it? He is not the only one on this list that that had a medical issue. I suppose an option is to completely remove the list. As far as I can tell, the list includes deaths caused by rather routine vehicle accidents, falls, aircraft accident.  -- Dual Freq (talk) 18:18, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fallen Troopers list
Talk:Angarrack

message: Removed final paragraph - poor grammer +  Kate Winslet no longer lives in Angarrack + ReferPeteTheHead is not of general interest
Spelling's not so good either. 
But if it celebrates its bicentenary this year, will this be kept up to date next year? Afterbrunel 19:19, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The year varies in the references. One is 1834 and the other 1843. I suspect one is a typo but do not know which is the correct year at the moment. Jowaninpensans (talk) 15:14, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Year of first chapel
Talk:Nerve growth factor

message: Sorry but I removed the two paragraphs that seemed to highlight (since they were in the first paragraph) some relatively suspect claims for NGF:
1) That NGF in the saliva helps in wound healing.  First of all, human saliva does not have NGF.  Secondly, skin does not have TrkA receptors.
2) That NGF is involved in romantic feelings.
Of all the many validated roles for this neurotrophic factor, it seems highlighting these two seems to trivialize it, and make the whole page seem somewhat unscientific.
Gacggt 21:55, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Proposed directive on criminal measures aimed at ensuring the enforcement of intellectual property rights

message: Dsol 11:43, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: When do they vote on this?

message: I have cleared up the whole text, adding a few new sections and a summary of most common critical remarks, as they are heard in the press and in the academic articles. 
I urge anyone interested in this subject to look at the legislative observatory (EU Parliament) and compare the original text with the subsequent amendments. It is astonishing how many amendments have passed and how truly appalling the original text is. --As286 10:22, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes

message: Sentences like "By rather wide academic, business and consumer consensus, IPRED2 is badly drafted." appear to be blatant neutrality violations. Please cite your sources. "All Wikipedia articles must be written from a neutral point of view, representing views fairly, proportionately and without bias." Thanks. --Edcolins 19:58, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:Neutrality|Neutrality]] 

message: According to http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/file.jsp?id=5263692, the directive has been withdrawn? 
"As announced in Official Journal C 252 of 18 September 2010, the Commission decided to withdraw this proposal, which had become obsolete." 78.72.181.116 (talk) 16:19, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Withdrawn? 
Talk:Airbus A330 MRTT

message: I propose changing the infobox image to a more representative photo. I have one which depicts the full capacity of the Voyager (ie refuelling 2 aircraft at once) and also thorough the more conventional probe and drogue method used by most nations. It is: RAF Voyager KC2 refuels two Tornado GR4.jpg J.Weir3 (talk) 21:49, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed image change
Talk:Parliamentary borough

message: I would dump the two seat bit and merge the rest into Borough constituency --Henrygb 22:00, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. The two-seat stuff is irrelevant and belongs at List of multi-member constituencies in the United Kingdom and predecessor Parliaments. For the rest, just redirect to Borough constituency (or rather to the place that redirects to). jnestorius(talk) 19:35, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Amar Chitra Katha

message: I'm not sure the list of issues is necessary.
:Those who find one necessary can find it at List of Amar Chitra Katha comics. NRPanikker (talk) 02:21, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article.  If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class.  The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject.  Hiding T  10:26, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: B-Class Assesment required

message: No source is given for the number of people that follow Tinkle. In addition, no source is given for "purely organic reach".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by X5163x (talk • contribs) 03:54, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  No source for Tinkle's Facebook 

message: The criticism section is overly outdated and needs updation most of the issues discussed as criticism have been addressed as mentioned the response section. There is no need to detail these outdated issues but should be trimmed to better address the present scenario. AnM2002 (talk) 06:54, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism section needs overhaul let's discuss
Talk:Ceylon Workers' Congress

message: "The Celon Indian Congress Labour Union was founded in 1940 as the labour wing of the Ceylon Indian Congress (CIC), itself formed in 1939... the Labour Union was renamed as the Celon Workers' Congress. It became a trade union with a seperate political wing, rather than vise versa, in 1950. In 1977 the CWC's political wing became a political party (also called the Ceylon Workers' Congress, and in effect indivisible from the union) and the union/party president Sovumiyamoorthy Thondaman, was returned to parliament..."  (Trade Unions of the World).
I don't have any direct knowledge of Sri Lanka and its politics, so I'm going to wait before tackling this. If anyone has ideas about the best way to put both the union and the party together in this article it would be helpful. --Bookandcoffee 22:01, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Union and political party
Talk:Gavin Bryars

message: I (joekafka) have been trying to make an edit to this text for some time, but my edit gets reversed, and I recently got blocked by an administrator for 'Edit warring'. My point is simply that Gavin Bryars arranged rather than composed the work 'Jesus Blood Never Failed Me Yet'. It is universally accepted that Bryars used a recording of a homeless man singing as the basis for his work. That recording is of a work by an unknown composer. Bryars looped part of this work and did a (wonderful) arrangement of it, but he is not responsible for writing any part of the melody or text. Bryars himself does not claim to have composed melody or text. Without the recording of the homeless man there would be no corresponding work by Gavin Bryars. Bryars' work was inspired by - and built upon - someone else's composition and someone else's performance. The composer of the piece and the man who sang it are almost certainly no longer alive, and if they were, it is improbable that they would try to correct this error here, but I would like to do so on their behalf. Joekafka (talk) 12:05, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: FYI, in classical music a setting of someone else's melody does not automatically reduce the setting down to a mere arrangement. Moreover the melody in question is unatributed FOLK item. Johann Sebastian Bach routinely used someone else's melodies for his COMPOSITIONS. 'Nuff said.--Galassi (talk) 12:40, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  It is not that unconventional. In any event you would have to demonstrate a reliable source arguing that it is a mere arrangement, in order to get it mentioned here. --Galassi (talk) 14:38, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Concerns over article content
Talk:Dunstable Downs

message: This article was recently moved from "Dunstable Downs" to "Dunstable and Whipsnade Downs" because that is "the official title, listed by English Nature as a Site of Scientific Interest".  However, this ignores the general Wikipedia policy on names which is to use the common name rather than an official name.
But first it is necessary to decide what this article is about.  Is it about the hill that attracts lots of visitors, which even the National Trust calls "Dunstable Downs", and which happens to be part of an SSSI?  Or is it about the SSSI called "Dunstable and Whipsnade Downs"?  In the latter case, the article should be clearer about what makes it interesting to scientists (I guess it is the flowers and butterflies), as well as saying it is a popular destination, etc.
In any case it may be desirable to check exactly what area is covered by the SSSI designation. JonH (talk) 16:57, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: [Copied from User talk:JonH] Hi there, I've just read your comments at Dunstable and Whipsnade Downs and I must admit I've probably made a right royal cock up. To be honest I would support an article that would incorporate that that it's both a National Trust managed area and a SSSI, otherwise we would end up with two articles broadly saying the same thing. Info as to why the area is a SSSI can be easily obtained, from English Nature and added (you're right, it's the flowers and butterflies!). As for the actual article name, well I'm not sure who has the most clout the NT or English Nature so perhaps this is an article for WP:COMMONNAME. Incidentally the NT lists it as Dunstable Downs and Whipsnade Estate. However as an alternative, you could name it Dunstable Downs and have the full title in the intro like this school near me. What do you think? Regards --Starrycupz (talk) 22:19, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename 

message: Hello! During late June, July and some of August, I'm working on a paid project sponsored by the National Trust to review and enahnce coverage of NT sites. You can find the project edits here, as well as a statement and contact details for the National Trust. I am leaving this message when I make a first edit to a page; please do get in touch if you have any concerns. Lajmmoore (talk) 20:30, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  National Trust pilot
Talk:A-2 jacket

message: If someone has one please feel free to post it, but please only post photos of WWII era jackets, or vintage photos of pilots wearing A-2's. I don't want this article to become an advertisement for any current manufacturer.
:BOO! After reading this article, I went on to read about Indiana Jones, the Fonz, and mondern takes on the A-2 jacket. I think there should be more pics, and more coverage of it as a fashion topic. --69.61.218.88 (talk) 04:25, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I found an old wartime advertisement that should be in the Public Domain, uploaded it and posted it. I'm not even sure that the company still exists today. Enjoy :-) אמר Steve Caruso (poll) 19:52, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

text: WOW, this is a really poorly referenced and neglected article.  Ken, if you're still around, you need to cite your references. This honestly seems like Original Research, and of course, there is WP:NOR. I'm here because I'm trying to research a jacket and all I have to go by is one person's 'extensive search' on Wartime production, yet no clue what sources he is searching, or what methods, or access that are possible.Centerone (talk) 00:12, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: If we're being honest the majority of the article is boring drivel. It's unsourced, uninteresting, and just goes on and on and on. Even with sources it would be a mixture of personal reflections and unnecessarily prolix descriptions of trivial manufacturing variations in thirty-year-old civilian imitations of a mutable military contract. If only the effort had been spent sourcing a decent colour image of the jacket! Just one picture. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 11:51, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Eurasian bullfinch

message: The external links section isn't really appropriate as all of these will probably have some information useful to this article as prose. See Wikipedia:External_links#Links_normally_to_be_avoided point 1.
*ARKive - images and movies of the Eurasian bullfinch (Pyrrhula pyrrhula)
*Eurasian Bullfinch videos, photos & sounds on the Internet Bird Collection
*Ageing and sexing (PDF) by Javier Blasco-Zumeta
Moving here if someone would like to complete this!
Nikthestoned 09:06, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links 

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Pyrrhula pyrrhula female 2.jpg +1 will be appearing as picture of the day on December 12, 2017. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2017-12-12. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:14, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Pyrrhula pyrrhula female 2.jpg]] +1 to appear as POTD soon 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Eurasian bullfinchs and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 8#Eurasian bullfinchs until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  William Avery (talk) 13:22, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like a female Northern Cardinal to me! 2603:7081:2339:8613:CD6A:27A1:6095:E8EE (talk) 17:28, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Eurasian bullfinchs" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:European Kingfisher

message: The name "Common Kingfisher" is far more widely known than
"European Kingfisher".  Google searches yield
*"Common Kingfisher": 138K pages 
*"European Kingfisher": 552 pages
Also, IUCN as well as other web resources such as
birdguides or 
Internet Bird Videos
show Alcedo atthis as "Common Kingfisher" and do not mention the name "European Kingfisher". 
Unless there are other reasons, I would feel that the page should be moved to Common Kingfisher which seems overwhelmingly the most prevalent
usage. mukerjee (talk) 10:24, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Change of Title
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject User scripts/Scripts/WikiBreak Enforcer

message: The talk page has it, but not the project page. Anonymous from Stack Overflow (talk) 10:23, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Department of Fun notice should be added to the article 

message: I think we should add some ways like: request in the user talk page of an interface admin or email an interface admin (it's hard because users are logged out, or get an email address for email an interface admin like global block appeals) for people who want to hide their IP address. Thingofme (talk) 13:59, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Pehaps an ARB-COM style email feature allowing us to contact interface admins. ---CX Zoom(he/him) (let's talk|contribs) 13:51, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: We should have some email like User:Interface administrators to email, because now IP address can reveal private information. Thingofme (talk) 03:27, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A way to request restore for mistake 

message: "In cases of errors, an interface admin can remove the script from your user JavaScript page for you."
This is simply inaccurate and a waste of resources. In case of errors, you should go to https://en.wikipedia.org/Special:MyPage/common.js?safemode=1 , as this simply disables all user scripts. QuickQuokka [⁠talk • contribs] 11:13, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: That will not prevent you from being kicked back out of your account. Izno (talk) 21:07, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  How so? ?safemode=1 literally disables ALL user JavaScript, and I don't see how the WikiBreak Enforcer is any different. QuickQuokka [⁠talk • contribs] 00:39, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Because safemode does not persist in navigation. Izno (talk) 03:10, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 8 August 2023 

message: turn the Script under Copy the code under Script below between /*** BEGIN WIKIBREAK ENFORCER ***/ and /*** END WIKIBREAK ENFORCER ***/. to regular text to remove the redundant link. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 14:56, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I fail to see the purpose of doing this. * Pppery * it has begun... 13:26, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 18 August 2023 

message: Urdu interwiki link is wrong and nonetheless leads to a non-existent page. Please remove it. Best regards, ─ Aafī (talk) 08:52, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:51, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 29 February 2024
Talk:The Crow: City of Angels (soundtrack)

message: * Interview  1996-09: Vol 26 Issue 9 Review ... some praise ... "But the abundance of derivative third-wave alternative alternabands [...] ultimately renders this album a lame duck in Crow's clothing. Author: Lorraine Ali. 
* Sound and vision book. Curiously, it says the album went to number 1 in the Billboard charts, but at the moment this Wikipedia article says it peaked at #8
* Spin magazine 1996-09: Vol 12 Issue 6 "For eight songs at least, The Crow: City of Angels soundtrack (Hollywood) is rock’s oddest and best since Batman Forever." Archive.org registration required. 
* Korn book includes a brief mention (p82) of their thoughts on doing the mainstream thing of being on a soundtrack album
As I was looking for sources related to the film I also found a few things about the soundtrack along the way. Hopefully they will be of some use to anyone interested in improving this article. -- 109.78.210.152 (talk) 01:52, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Plumbago

message: From what I can recall from college, "Plumbago" refers to the blue flowers, not a cure for lead poisoning (lead poisoning was not known of until much more recently!) SB Johnny 16:36, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I wondered about that, too.  This article is likely the source of that information.  I've also found other references to "Plumbago" as being a term for "Blacklead."  I don't know what the ultimate source of that information is...  I'll do some digging and see what else I find.  Thanks for bringing this up!  -Rkitko 00:59, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OED derives the name from the colour of the flowers, but as the name dates back to Classical Latin at least, that may be uncertain. The lead poisoning cure may be a later idea, perhaps developed from the doctrine of signatures - MPF 11:38, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I won't be spending time looking this us, but lead has been historically used to make blue in alchemy, etc. SB Johnny 11:43, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Latin name meaning? 

message: Food Plant of Zebra Blue butterfly.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arundhati.mhatre (talk • contribs) 09:23, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Usage 
Talk:Urbanate

message: This article should not be deleted. It provides valuable information. That information is important to the understanding of Technocracy. Although some self promoted self generated material is obviously here with so many links to TechCa, this article is salvageable. This new file makes a difference already http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dfx7rfr2_29n46jr9
A Place To Live In. Wilton Ivie Technocracy Digest Nov.1955.  It is a clean file with no baggage and the information in it is very valuable. Although most of the content here is self generated original conclusion stuff, this article can be pared down and streamlined into something good.(skip sievert 22:36, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Skip, why did you put this here? You yourself have stated many times that Urbanates are not even mentioned in the Study Course, so why do you think that it is relevant to put a link to the Study Course here? --Kolzene 01:49, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to Study Course 

message: To a John Darvill essay that mentions Urbanates. 
http://www.technocracy.org/Archives/Time%20For%20Decisions-r.HTM
Time For Decisions - Urbanates -  John Darvill 1998 skip sievert (talk) 18:39, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Added a link

message: This edit by John Quiggin was reverted false edit summary by that user. This user it is noted is wikihounding information related to this article also... note here on that subject from Economics project page. skip sievert (talk) 03:58, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect
Talk:Jim Hurtubise

message: I removed all of the references to his first name only. Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (biographies), this is discouraged because "The use of the first name gives the impression that the writer knows the subject personally, which, even if true, is not relevant.". Also, in my opinion, it makes the article read like a People Magazine fluf-piece.  --rogerd 03:09, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of first name 

message: Citations needed for common knowledge, including all finishing orders for Indy 500?  Some of the citation requests I can understand, but other open-wheel (and other) auto racing stubs don't require this sort of citation.  Twohlford (talk) 02:11, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  citations always needed? 

message: Per the template documentation, cause of death should be included only when significant to the subject's notability - that bar isn't met in this case, as he's not notable for not dying in a racing accident. Heart disease is a leading cause of death for men of that age and qualifies as routine. Nikkimaria (talk) 15:08, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heart attack