lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Watling Street

message: I reverted an edit that moved an image of the Street as a green lane (near Crick) from "History" to the info box because [imo] it does not give a reasonable impression of Watling Street as it is today. The image of the Street in Canterbury is actually a lot more typical but I doubt that too many people would support the idea of that image being featured in the infobox. If we are to have an image, it seems to me that we should first week consensus of what it should be. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 17:20, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image in the infobox 

message: Although a car goes slower round a bend, I don't think a river does. The volume of water past a point in a river is approximately constant, or it would back up and form a lake. DMichael6 (talk) 16:40, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bend in river 

message: is this place to be linked? -- 2001:4DD5:4643:0:8039:1C4F:D3FD:4586 (talk) 00:53, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: As it is north of Wroxeter, it probably doesn't qualify as Watling Street. However the table showing the route of the Antonine Iter II had Mediolanum as 'unknown' without explanation (which may just show how long ago it was written). I have just added it: if there is an issue then it can be explained here. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 11:18, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Mediolanum (Whitchurch)]]
Talk:Airbus Beluga

message: I think the lead needs to be heavily reworked - right now it mentions the entry to service date of its successor aircraft, but not even the entry to service date of itself! My attempt at this has been flushed out entirely without discussion (on the apparent basis that it covers material mentioned in the article aka what a lead is supposed to?), so I guess it's up to somebody else to try to reform it to decently cover its subject. Kyteto (talk) 19:33, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reworking the lead
Talk:Zwan

message: Looks like there is a mistake "In the May 27, 2005 edition of Entertainment Weekly, Billy Corgan gave his version of the reasons behind Zwan's breakup."
Maybe it's not 2005, but 2003?
Avel791
Definitely 2005. The EW article was regarding Corgan's solo album, but it was also one of the first times he gave reasons for Zwan's demise to a large media outlet (as opposed to his own blogs, etc.).
Pumpkingrrl
"The album was largely viewed as a disappointment for various reasons" -- Judging from the reviews linked to on the album's page this statement is rather biased.
:I agree, all the reviews I've seen have been positive. Cookiecaper 04:24, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I've always heard that it was a disappointment too; from what little I've actually heard of Zwan, maybe because it was mainly fans of the Smashing Pumpkins expecting something equally melancholy?  Regardless, it seems to have been not that big of a success *commercially* (to quote the  album page: "Although it reached # 3 in the US, it didn't have staying power in the charts."), whatever the reasons for that were (bad marketing? lack of drive from the band? 01 couldn't say). Now whether that justifies the statement or not?  At best the statement is still a bit misleading in some ways, although accurate in others. Probably should be reworded a bit anyways.  Phil Urich 01:40, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mistake? 

message: On the inside of the CD booklet, it lists "BILLY BURKE" as GUITAR/VOCALS instead of BILLY CORGAN.
Thought that was interesting.... --Orbzon 01:53, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Billy Burke 

message: People just want to hear SP and there is alot of that here, but also something different. Beats Gish or MCIS hands down. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.230.42.21 (talk) 22:37, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  It's a shame because "Mary Star of the Sea" is a really great CD 

message: I think that the term supergroup is sorely misapplied. 01 never even heard of this band until today, and 01 was into the Pumpkins and the alternative scene. 70.22.154.184 (talk) 16:07, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Supergroup? 

message: It's not clear how _A Perfect Circle_ is related at all, or as an "associated act". Please clarify or remove ... (That James Iha is in APC really has nothing to do with Zwan.) -- Newagelink (talk) 19:17, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Associated Acts? Not clear what association exists, regarding A Perfect Circle
Talk:Dorothy McGuire

message: No mention of Fonda, Stewart, Leland Hayward, Margaret Sullavan... Selznick did not "bring" her to Hollywood, he didn't even know her at the time.  Selznick does not bring completely unknown provincial hick actors to Hollywood.Wjhonson (talk) 16:53, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Biography

message: Although her obits in reliable sources like the NYT and the Guardian say 1918, census results (she's listed as 3 and a half in 1920 and 13 in 1930) and the Social Security Death index  indicate 1916 to be correct. Crisso (talk) 18:03, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Birth year
Talk:NFL

message: I reverted the edit back to the 15 August 2003 version, because it was not discussed. I would argue that "NFL" should redirect to National Football League because it is a exteremly common abbreviation here in the United States. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 00:09, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect to [[National Football League]]

message: We should change it to the National Forensic League because jocks are stupid and they don't deserve another win.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.199.21.95 (talk) 02:45, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Obviously, you are very biased by saying "jocks are stupid and they don't deserve another win". Just read the discussion above as to why it currently redirects to National Football League]]. Also, the fact is that when you enter "NFL" into Google, it immediately lists pages pertaining to the National Football League. You have to go through a number of pages in the search result to find the first web site about the National Forensic League. Regards. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 17:46, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  National Forensic League 
Talk:Premier of Tasmania

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Premiers of Victoria which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 15:00, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Polygraph

message: A lot of space in this article - most of the section “Society and culture” - was taken up by recounting TV shows in which a polygraph is used to supposedly solve a case or reveal the truth. IMO this coverage was way excessive and added little or no relevant information to the article - and most of it was unsourced to boot. I have provided sources for a few of the more directly relevant items. The others were detailed retellings of a particular episode of a TV show in which a polygraph is featured, either to reveal the truth or to fool the machine. None of them was referenced and I have deleted them all. Anyone object? If so, please explain why you think they are significant and provide references. -- MelanieN (talk) 17:14, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  TV episodes 

message: I don't know what you mean by "are 98% effective". Effectiveness is neither reliability nor validity, so I don't know what you mean. I cannot make heads or tails of it. How do you define effectiveness? How do you measure it? What are WP:RS for it? What you wrote is grammatically correct, but it does not have meaning. In plaintext: tell us where did you read that polygraph examinations are 98% effective. Tgeorgescu (talk) 23:02, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Effective 

message: I am moving the following uncited material here until it can be properly supported with inline citations of reliable, secondary sources, per WP:V, WP:CS, WP:IRS, WP:PSTS, WP:BLP, WP:NOR, et al. This diff shows where it was in the article. Nightscream (talk) 17:41, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It is true what you say, but it needs a source. tgeorgescu (talk)  22:49, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Service: That refers to this reinsertion of one of the paragraphs below. --Hob Gadling (talk) 08:57, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Uncited material in need of citations

message: Even though a few sources are cited, should it really be referred to as "junk science"?  This doesn't sound very neutral. 2601:49:8400:26B:F89F:F8CE:B532:A6BB (talk) 14:01, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: "Neutral" does not mean "some say this, some say that" on Wikipedia. It means "follow where the sources go". See WP:FALSEBALANCE. --Hob Gadling (talk) 14:13, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Junk science"?
Talk:100 Club Punk Special

message: "and punk music was enjoyed.  It is where Vicious recieved the nickname Vicious when he beat Nick Kent, a jouralist who didn't like the Sex Pistols, to a bloody pulp with a chain and so Johnny Rotten christened him "Vicious" there at the festival."
Historically inaccurate & POV article that needs a major rewrite/expansion.
THIS FESTIVAL OCCURED ON THE 20TH AND THE 21ST, NOT 21ST AND THE 22ND. I HAVE CORRECTED THIS.
Does anybody agree with that statement? It's a long time ago now but I was at the first night and I'm pretty sure it wasn't a Sunday. Also, the details of the glass-smashing incident, particularly the degree of injury involved, were obscure at the time, and as far as the Vicious / Kent fracas is concerned, as far as I know the only primary source for this story is Kent himself. Finally, can anybody confirm the running order for the first night? As I say, it's a long time ago but my recollection has always been that Siouxsie was up first, then the Subway Sect. BTLizard 10:48, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The first night was on a Monday. I was there and I'd come straight from school. MY memory suggests that Subway Sect were on first and Siouxie on next. (But I could be, er, wrong...)81.141.82.218 (talk) 21:23, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening Comments 
Talk:Doom (1993 video game)

message: When did it release in Japan and Australia. Hellonature (talk) 21:00, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  DOS version in Japan and Australia 

message: I think we should be using the genre in this case. From WP:VG/SHORTDESC: 
 Popcornfud (talk) 17:05, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm good either way, so if you feel strongly I'll revert myself. --PresN 18:21, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm kind of fine with either too, just trying to follow the guidance. IMO it's slightly more useful to add the genre to help people identify the article I guess. Popcornfud (talk) 18:50, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shortdesc 

message: I'm a bit surprised this article doesn't mention that the NeXT-based code was also easily ported to other Unix systems running X.  ID's David Taylor (his initials are the "ddt" in the secret codes) and I got together to run his IRIX (SGI's Unix) port on an SGI Onyx RE2 at Origin Games (also in Austin, like ID) where it ran well at 1280x1024, possibly the single most attractive run of the game on anything at the time. Alex North-Keys (talk) 22:05, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: It's listed at List of Doom ports, along with the Solaris port he did; the only reason the Linux port is listed here but not those two is that I don't have a good reliable source for him doing it- using the usenet post for the linux port is honestly stretching things quite a bit as it is. --PresN 04:26, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doom was also ported to Unix by ID
Talk:Yamanashi Prefecture

message: (Flower, Tree, Bird) are very vague translations. I tried to get more information and locate the botanical name for them but it looks like there is very little information available in English.
Especially the prefectural tree (Kaede; 楓 or カエデ) seems to have to many different names and variations according to The Maple website. 
Any hint or better translation is welcome. 
synthetik 15:44 Feb 16, 2003 (UTC)
I wonder if it is really necessary to be so specific with the city symbols as to even add the botanical name, which is of no interest to the majority of people. I think a general english name for the bird, flower should be more helpful. Does anyone really care about the subspecies? Who cares very much about the city symbols anways. I don't think it's necessary to put such big effort in it. Just my two cents. Cheers Geofrog 03:29, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The prefectural symbols 

message: I was wondering if it would be a good idea to add information about radiation effects of the leaks of the Fukushima nuclear power plants.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiation_effects_from_Fukushima_Daiichi_nuclear_disaster  — Preceding unsigned comment added by BeeQC (talk • contribs) 03:23, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Radiation effects?
Talk:Politics of Trinidad and Tobago

message: A number of "time-related" statements need updating by someone who is familiar with the current situation: 
>In recent months a new political presence has emerged...< : that "recent" was added in September 2006 (!)
>with recent time [...] elections [...] fast approaching on the 5th November, 2007..< : added in October 2007 (the elections in question have, presumably, approached and long gone past by now)
Other amendments need making to this section -- ("defunked" --> defunct, although "lapsed" or "former" would probably be better; possessive "it's" --> its) -- but the time-frame needs adjusting first. -- Picapica (talk) 16:17, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need for updates 

message: So, I'm no expert and that's why I have to ask...  What is former supposed to refer to in this line from the 4th paragraph: "Led by former Winston Dookeran, the majority?"--UESPArules (talk) 02:40, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question on this 
Talk:Stress

message: I want to add a page describing geological stress.  Should I add a redirect, or edit this page directly and remove the stuff about disambiguation?   cferrero  — Preceding undated comment added 16:15, 16 February 2003
: I haven't looked at what CF eventually did on the accompanying main-namespace page, but just for the record geological stress does not exist, and the answer is "No, neither of those possibilities you mention." --Jerzy•t 02:15, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: None of these  are what someone looking at Stress should expect, even tho the list may be useful to editors adding useful lks to articles on the pages they should expect.
* Tensile stress
* Compressive stress
* Shear stress
** Extensional stress term for normal stress in rheology
** Longitudinal stress term for normal stress in acoustics 
**Flexural strength
:== See also ==
** Stress management, techniques for coping with personal stress
*** Critical Incident Stress Management
I'm not taking the time to thoroughly clean up the page; some others probably deserve similary treatment.--Jerzy•t 02:15, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removals 

message: I wnt abut effects of preesure on strees and strain Sattucharan (talk) 04:49, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biology 

message: Stress (Swiss musician) should be moved to Arts, entertainment, and media - Music--Sun-kid (talk) 20:05, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I've moved Stress (musician) and Stress (record producer) to Groups and musicians. Thanks for pointing this out. —Bruce1eetalk 21:01, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  wrong category
Talk:Isaac Deutscher

message: The chronology of the section on Deutscher's anti-Stalinist activity, his expulsion and the publication of "The Danger of Barbarism over Europe" needs clarifying. We need dates for each of these three deveopments. Tamara Deutscher's preface to "The Non-Jewish Jew & Other Essays" is unclear on the sequence and contradicts Marxists.org's entry for Deutcher (see http://www.marxists.org/glossary/people/d/e.htm#deutscher-isaac ). We don't know when exactly "The Danger of Barbarism over Europe" began to appear in the underground CP papers. It was unlikely to have been in 1933 because it seems the KPP had expelled Deutcher by this stage and he'd likely be denied access to the underground presses from which the "The Danger of Barbarism" was published. It appears that "The Danger of Barbarism" was Deutscher's reaction to, rather than a cause of, his expulsion from KPP.
58.172.104.13 (talk) 01:05, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: This looks like a person who made a lot of enemies both at the left as at the right side of politics, people and countries.  Was his sudden death ever investigated? How did he die?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.125.148.175 (talk) 20:17, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: We certainly need information as to why he died.--Jack Upland (talk) 22:28, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Enemies 

message: Why is there so much information on this?--Jack Upland (talk) 22:28, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Israeil and Judaism 

message: I read his Stalin biog in my youth and I recall that there were a series of introductions which showed the evolution of his views over the years (all of which were printed, but it was in an edition after his death so I've no idea if he would have approved). Might be worth a note if somebody has a copy to hand.Paulturtle (talk) 01:32, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: As far as I know, from the time Deutscher wrote his Stalin biography till the day he (Deutscher) died, his view of Stalin remained fundamentally the same. His 1966 preface to the second edition states "I have seen no reason to alter my narrative or interpretation of Stalin's career." --Ismail (talk) 10:27, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stalin biog & evolution of views
Talk:MTV

message: Why does this article introduce MTV as a music video channel? MTV describes itself (more accurately) as reality shows and celebrity news.  Worldbook1967 (talk) 06:05, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  MTV Format  

message: Can the history of The Real World be added to MTV’s page? JanetintheUK (talk) 05:19, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree! I’m astonished that there is no mention of this program on the page. 2600:1014:B08F:5309:2866:C78B:A4EB:8F39 (talk) 20:22, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Real World 

message: With already existing sections on animation, adult or otherwise, where is the mention/link to the already existing wiki page on Liquid Television? 2001:861:8B80:6ED0:F196:7C98:BA26:44EA (talk) 08:39, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where is Liquid Television reference?
Talk:America's Cup

message: This page says that there were 8 cutters and 7 schooners in the first America's cup, but on the document about the first America's cup it says that there were 8 cutters and 9 schooners in the race. Can someone please clarify this?
Thanks, Kaizo block (talk) 16:48, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  First America's cup 

message: I don’t understand how Conner’s win-loss record is given as 13-5 when he lost 4 races in 1983 and 5 in 1995. Shouldn’t it be 13-9?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.80.236.247 (talk) 15:34, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Dennis Conner’s Record

message: I suggest to move the history section to its own page, as it is very long and only leave a brief summary in this page (comparable to the history section on this page: 38th America's Cup). This allows to focus the Americas Cup page more on general information and summary's that are more relevant to most users. Additionally, this allows to shorten and focus the pages for the Americas Cup editions, which are full of unnecessary general Americas Cup information that should be on this page.
If no one disagrees I would implement this change in the coming weeks. V.Glas (talk) 12:57, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move history to its own page
Talk:List of Royal Navy ships

message: I recognized that Royal Navy probably referred to the United Kingdom.  Finding the category does indicates "Ships of the United Kingdom", but it isn't stated in the lists of ships I've looked at.  Is it that obvious to English speakers that it isn't needed, or should/can it be added?  Please be kind, I'm new to Wikipedia!
Hello - I wanted to pass along to you a very comprehensive list generated by Gordon Smith of Naval-History.net, in part from data gathered by the Old Weather project.  Here is the link:  http://www.naval-history.net/WW1NavyBritishShips-Dittmar3WarshipsA.htm  If you have any questions, please feel free to visit the Old Weather forum site - Oldweather.org.  Yours - Kathy Wendolkowski 216.15.44.249 (talk) 18:57, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indicate United Kingdom? 

message: Please see Lamalcha.  There is one comment on HMS Forward that says it was sold in 1869...that would have to have been after it was bought back from the Lamalcha, who seized it and sold it in 1863 or '64.  As that article says, which I got from a book called The Lamalcha War which I browsed in a BC Ferries bookshop one day, this was supposedly the only major defeat of the Royal Navy from the Crimean War to the end of the 19th C, maybe to the start of the Great War.  I'm wondering if there are any Royal Navy histories on this incident that might augment that page; a Lamalcha War article may be split off from it, so the more detail the better.Skookum1 (talk) 07:53, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  dabs on the Forward and Satellite for 1863
Talk:Rohan, Middle-earth

message: :
Roch-hir-rim is "horse-master-folk", and Roch-and is "horse-land"; is "Land of the Horse-lords" given in canon? —Tamfang (talk) 17:22, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed, the etymology section is sufficient. Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:51, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Horse-lords
Talk:Epistemic community

message: Relation between such communities and logic as a process being debated at m:Logic_and_Wikipedia
How does Peter Haas fit in. --Vegalabs 18:52, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

message: This article does not help the uninitiated at all. The first sentence reads "An epistemic community may consist of those who accept one version of a story, or one version of validating a story."
The first sentence should begin with something like "An epistemic community is ...". Maybe completing the sentence with "a group of people who share a view, even though they do not really form a community, as they may not even know each other" would do. I did not edit the page myself because I did not really undestood the article so I might have gotten all wrong.
Please, if you do know what "epistemic community" is, change at lease the first sentence.
190.160.133.87 20:21, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article urgently needs cleanup; if you know the subject matter, please help 

message: This section on epistemic communities is very problematic and misses a huge portion of the theoretical debate put forward by others such as Ernst Haas or Emanuel Adler. It also misses the empirical discussion about it with regard to epistemic communities working on nuclear deterance or environmental issues, as well as differentiating epistemic communities from other knowledge/ information groups such as transnational advocacy networks.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lior.herman (talk • contribs) 10:55, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Very problematic