lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Cello Concerto No. 1 (Saint-Saëns)

message: It seems as though, for a non-musician coming across this article, there is a lot more technical detail than might be wanted or needed. This could scare away general classical music listeners or readers from reading it. Perhaps, as the saying goes, less would be more here.  Jonyungk (talk) 03:42, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too much technical detail? 

message: I cannot find any reference to support this anywhere on the internet.
It's been tagged with "citation needed" for a long time. I think it should be removed, but I don't know if bots will immediately revert it if I do so, so some more experienced editor should probably take care of it.
--84.119.42.103 (talk) 13:46, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rachmaninov Schostakovich quote
Talk:Piano Concerto No. 5 (Saint-Saëns)

message: A previous editor gave statements about first recordings of the work. This cannot be corroborated. Michel Plasson conducted an Orchestre et Chœurs du Capitole de Toulouse performance in a ca. 1968-1970s recording on Columbia Records.Dogru144 (talk) 23:01, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Promotion of modern renditions?
Talk:The Dying Swan

message: *At the moment the "background" section is by far the longest and contains all sorts of material, beyond what i would call 'background' to this ballet. A section with such a name should contain only background material - the circumstances in which the ballet came to be created; the cultural content of ballet at that time into which this piece was introduced (for two examples). Material relating to its actual choreography; critical reviews and commentary - these should be in other sections.
*For 'plot summary', I symphathise with not trying to improve on someone else's prose, but no-one is likely to support having a section that contains just a big quote. Has no-one else written about the plot and/or is there no way of improving the summary?
*'Performance history' should cover more than just the first performance. Some of the material from the section "Non-traditional interpretations and adaptations" may belong here.
*There should be a section on critical reception and legacy.
These are just some of the issues editors are likely to be asked to address. hamiltonstone (talk) 06:37, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Issues I suggest for addressing prior to GA review

message: What is the date of the premiere, 1905 or 1907 ? The source used (note 5, "The Dying Swan". Oxford Dictionary of Dance. Oxford University Press) give 22 December 1907, not 1905 ?
--BeatrixBelibaste (talk) 13:23, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  1905 or 1907
Talk:Catulli Carmina

message: Whereas Carmina Burana is a favourite showpiece for amateur choirs, Catulli Carmina is simply too difficult for them.  An amateur choir performing Catulli Carmina would need to maintain its pitch throughout the unaccompanied central section (lasting some 15 minutes); any deviation from the original pitch would be exposed as soon as the orchestra returns for the final section.
86.4.253.180 (talk) 03:33, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible reason for lack of popularity 
Talk:Piano Sonata No. 2 (Ives)

message: This is a pathetic entry. Most glaringly, the 2012 Dover Edition of the sonata is not at all "updated," as the article says, but is merely a reprint of the superceded 1920 edition. Kylegann (talk) 03:30, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Drury
Talk:Greek traditional music

message: This is an article about Greek traditional music. The difference in meaning between "folk" and "traditional" is not trivial as they describe the extinct vs. extant versions -- respectively -- of the same kind of music. --kupirijo (talk) 10:23, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: * @Kupirijo, from what sources do you draw your conclusions? Folk music does not cease to be folk music, whether it exists or is extinct. The same can be said about traditional music. The only rule that should be applied in this case is consistency in naming articles. And at the moment, 95% of the articles have the title "... folk music". Traditional music articles refers mainly to those cultures where folk music is intertwined with classical/art music. There are only a few such articles, and they are all of Asian cultures. Solidest (talk) 20:25, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename to [[Greek traditional music]] 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. No opposition for two years. Rationale is also reasonable (closed by non-admin page mover) Megan B.... It’s all coming to me till the end of time 19:54, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Greek folk music →  – This is an article about Greek traditional music. The difference in meaning between "folk" and "traditional" is not trivial as they describe the extinct vs. extant versions -- respectively -- of the same kind of music. kupirijo (talk) 01:10, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 1 February 2022
Talk:Three Places in New England

message: The composer's booth brthday?   Literal?    100th?   (Can't see how the keyboard got to it, but unless it really is "booth".....Culduthel (talk) 12:36, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

message: Is there a reason for footnote 3?  It's a permalink to an old version page.  Why not link the text to the current page rather than footnote? Apesbrain (talk) 15:50, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggested Edit: "The Three Places" Section
Talk:Righteous Kill

message: That plot summary is wrong. I just saw the movie and that is not how the movie goes at all.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Woahwoahme (talk • contribs) 18:56, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot is Wrong!

message: Cast section needs fixing  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.83.225.219 (talk) 06:46, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I am sure that their names are mentioned quite early on. -- Beardo (talk) 05:56, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Cast section

message: Source of confirmation for Shamele Mackie AKA Papoose's role in Righteous Kill
http://smartenupnas.com/2008/02/29/50-cent-interviews-max-b-papoose-remy-ma/  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.125.78.12 (talk) 19:40, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Shamele Mackie

message: I pulled this:
> , but it will be the first in which they've shared significant time onscreen together.
The two shared quite a bit of screen time in Heat. 'Significant' is pretty subjective, so this really falls into opinion.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.114.192.225 (talk) 17:06, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Significant screen time

message: Shouldn't the video game based on the movie be mentioned?  I think it came out even before the film did. — Frecklefσσt | Talk 16:27, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: The Game

message: Does this even merit a mention ? -- Beardo (talk) 05:54, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stockwell Tube
Talk:L'isle joyeuse

message: The score sample of the opening of this work contains an error - the last d should be a d sharp (as noted in a comment which I have moved from the article to this talk page. Philip Howard (talk) 08:23, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Xanthoxyl < 04:46, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Error in sample
Talk:List of compositions by Claude Debussy by Lesure number

message: This list uses Lesure's 1977 catalogue. Confusingly, he did a "revised" catalogue in 2003 that totally renumbers everything!  see http://www.debussy.fr --feline1 (talk) 19:14, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Ok, so I'm done the list as I know it, but the dates are still the old ones, and it's a bit inconsistent. Thank you Saguaro-sun for jump starting this. ♫ Melodia Chaconne ♫ (talk) 15:25, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reduxing the list
Talk:The 100 Scariest Movie Moments

message: This page has come under scrutiny for possible acts of vandalism.  The top 3 "scariest movie moments" were inconcise with the listing found at the Bravo website found here: http://www.bravotv.com/The_100_Scariest_Movie_Moments/index.shtml.  I fixed the vandalism but the site is now in need of a description of the three scenes in question. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ToledoSuperman (talk • contribs) 02:42, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The stats section is a very hard to read and excessively linked pile-up of
statements that would be much better of put into a table format, e.g. as
a listing of person:number-of-entries:name-of-entries.
88.77.189.22 (talk) 07:47, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This apparently was fixed. Looks fine now. Rivertorch (talk) 23:45, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stats 

message: I've added a WP:SPEEDY tag to the head of the article. The list itself is certainly a copyright violation, as I doubt reprinting it counts as fair use in any way. The Stats section likely violates WP:OR, and the list of interviewees probably doesn't meet the standards of WP:N. I've notified Edgehawk, as he is the only non-IP user to have recently edited the page. Given that I am a relatively inexperienced user, I apologize if I've incorrectly tagged the page and would appreciate further advice as to the best way of dealing with this. As a note, 30 Even Scarier Movie Moments, which this article links to, is probably G12 too, though I'll wait to see the reaction to this before I tag that. Cheers, Archaeo (talk) 11:28, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding Speedy Template 

message: Why isn't the full 100, or at least part of it, printed in this article?  Some guy above mentions copyright violation but you Wikipedia people are too strict on copyright.  Why doesn't Wikipedia move its servers to a country in Europe with more sensible laws about copyright where knowledge comes before the "rights" of big business?--109.228.75.116 (talk) 18:57, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Per WP:NFC, Wikipedia should not include "A complete or partial recreation of "Top 100" or similar lists where the list has been selected in a creative manner. Articles on individual elements from such lists can discuss their inclusion in these lists." - this may well be too strict, but it's the current consensus on this kind of content. --McGeddon (talk) 17:56, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

text: Wikipedia hasn't changed its stance on including copyrighted content since 2012 - the article can mention elements of the list, but should not include the whole thing. --McGeddon (talk) 08:50, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where's the list?
Talk:Neo kyma

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. per the rationale given by Solidest, and HumanBodyPiloter5's statement that this title is misleading. (non-admin closure) VR talk 03:07, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Greek New Wave →  – The original spelling is widely used in English for the genre, so it has to be the main name of the article Solidest (talk) 23:54, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

text: courtesy ping on opened discussion. -2pou (talk) 00:49, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

text: This is a contested technical request (permalink). 2pou (talk) 00:48, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: 'Greek New Wave' is unsourced at the moment. The first source is completely on Greek, the second mentions 'neo kyma' spelling only. Google gives 25 200 results for "greek new wave", where half of results are about cinema movement or new wave scene, not about this folk genre. "Neo kyma" gives 38 000 results for me, and the results seem to be entirely music-related. Looks pretty uncontroversial for me. Perhaps the only question here is to use WP:DIACRITICS or not: Neo kyma / Néo kýma. Solidest (talk) 01:28, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 25 November 2021
Talk:1930 NSWRFL season

message: The Grand Final's team lineups has "St George Dragon Slayers" for the St George team's name. Is this citeable?--Jeff79 (talk) 03:07, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  St George Dragon Slayers? 
Talk:1932 NSWRFL season

message: I'm using the Whiticker and Collis for the team line ups and I think the forward pack numbers/positions need to be fixed. Frank Curran was a prop but is at lock on this list on the new 8-13. I won't pretend to be any good at putting them around the right way, in fact I go cross-eyed. Would someone care to fix it? •Florrie•leave a note• 12:31, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, I made myself a template to decode and I think I have it right. Still went cross-eyed though. Please check in case I buggered it up. •Florrie•leave a note• 13:20, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Position numbering
Talk:Music of Epirus (Greece)

message: *Songs from Politsani
*Epirus Music
*Epirus singing
*Unesco
*polifonia
Category:Albanian music
Category:Greek music
Megistias (talk) 20:44, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I am changing it,references and all?Megistias (talk) 21:24, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: External links

message: I've restored the formed title 'Music of Epirus' since the latest move, apart from being pov, was performed without any discussion and a proposal (similar fashion like in Pyrros Dimas recently).Alexikoua (talk) 11:54, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move
Talk:Leventikos

message: The last para says:
The Levendikos dance performed in Petroussa is very different from the one in Florina.
(my emphasis).  This is the only occurrence of the spelling in the article, although one of the external links also uses -nd- instead of -nt-.  Could somebody please explain why these different transliterations exist?  yoyo (talk) 14:50, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Variant spellings in transliteration 
Talk:List of compositions by Alban Berg

message: I have added the movements names of the Op. 5, but I am not sure about them. Someone can confirm or correct these names?
* Vier Stücke, Op. 5, clarinet and piano, composed 1913, published 1920
** MaBig ?
** Sehr langsam ?
** Sehr rasch ?
** Langsam ?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by KDesk (talk • contribs) 04:15, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Op. 5 movements 

message: What is the purpose of the names in parentheses?  For example: "Spielleute (Henrik Ibsen)" - what does Ibsen have to do with this work?  Jtyroler (talk) 07:33, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Names in parentheses 

message: for a more "complete" list of all (non scenical) Works see: http://albanberg.resampled.de/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:C7:E3DF:7501:CDEB:2352:5823:1E64 (talk) 08:01, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not at all "complete"!!!!!!
Talk:Give a little nibble

message: This advertising campaign is almost forgotten. Wendy's has had very few ads that did not work out.
:I'll let this one go.  I mistook this for a hoax, hence the Speedy Delete tag .  Next time, though, please do not remove the tag yourself; instead add  underneath it.  SuperDT 06:08, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

message: I honestly can't see this expanding beyond the two paragraphs. Would a merge to Wendy's be in order? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 17:28, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:List of compositions by Ernest Chausson

message: ==Untitled==
I suggest that this page be merged with the Ernest Chausson article. I'm not sure how to do that yet so if anyone knows how to do that-perhaps they could do it? --Godfinger 18:48, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge Proposal

message: I suggest that this page be merged with the Ernest Chausson article. I'm not sure how to do that yet so if anyone knows how to do that-perhaps they could do it? --Godfinger 18:48, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: does that mean, in general, four solo voices, or chorus? Clarity would be nice. Schissel | Sound the Note! 01:03, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Four ... voices"? 
Talk:List of compositions by Felix Mendelssohn

message: A lot is missing here especially choral works, see this link http://www.classical.net/music/composer/works/mendelssohn/stage.php#sac . If anyone has time, could they update it please. Thanks!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by FlyingScotsman72 (talk • contribs) 12:02, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A lot missing!
Talk:List of compositions by Gabriel Fauré

message: Is there an opus number for the Messe Basse? If so, it's missing from here. On the other hand, maybe there is no number - a google search doesn't show any number being given.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.194.171.29 (talk) 03:41, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Messe basse opus number?

message: It would be helpful if this list contained dates. IXIA (talk) 06:24, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Dates

message: "9 preludes, Op. 103 (1809-10)"? I don't think those dates are right, since that was before he was born.... --97.115.131.148 (talk) 04:54, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong dates? 

message: The entry for opus 71 seems highly questionable. I am not a cellist, but I have found little real evidence for a solo Papillon. It seems to me as if it might simply be an error for the Papillon for cello and piano, opus 77.  In addition, I have seen some indications that the Theme and Variations, Op. 73, might have originally occupied the 71 slot - which would mean that it now should be empty.  Is anyone able to shed light on this?
For opus 81 we seem to have no entry at all these days.
Neither of these numbers are in the list of numbers that Nectoux states were not used. I don't have access to the full version of Nectoux's book, however, so I don't know if he sheds any light on either of these cases.  Possibilites include them representing earlier versions of pieces that ended up with a different number. Alternatively, it might just be that they are particularly obscure pieces that have not entered the repertoire. Orfeocookie (talk) 15:40, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed both 71 and 81 don't exist. I don't have the book now (it was a university library borrow) but I used the list in Gabriel Faure: A Guide to Research () for my own purposes and those were missing. ♫ Melodia Chaconne ♫ (talk) 17:13, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  Okay, thank you. I've found out that there's a copy of Nectoux's book available in a library nearby, so I might see if it sheds any light as to WHY the numbers are missing. Because the text on non-assigned opuses (9, 53, 60, 64 and 100) also says that "some works which in the end remained unpublished, notably some of his transcriptions, were given a number".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Orfeocookie (talk • contribs) 01:12, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opuses 71 and 81 

message: There is a new catalogue of all of Fauré known works by Jean-Michel Nectoux, identifying 201 works by a new "N" number. Sadly all the libraries are still closed here in Germany, so I haven't had the chance to look at it. Is there any objection to include the N numbers here? intforce (talk) 21:53, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nectoux catalogue
Talk:List of compositions by George Enescu

message: If any of the works are in the Public Domain, then each of these works with this status should be marked as such. Given that Enescu died in 1955, there is some time left until all of his works will have lapsed into the Public Domain, assuming the standard/widespread copyright term of life+70+1 years. -Mardus (talk) 16:40, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Why should they be so marked?—Jerome Kohl (talk) 23:35, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Public Domain status of works
Talk:The Dirtwater Dynasty

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Indignant Flamingo (talk) 00:39, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:List of compositions by George Gershwin

message: Gershwin recorded many improvisations of his songs on piano rolls and tapes, many of which have been transcribed to sheet music.  Should these be included here?  Asmeurer (talk  ♬ contribs) 02:41, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  improvizations? 

message: I'm listening to Michael Tilson Thomas' arrangement of (and premiere recording of) Gershwin's Melody No. 40, entitled on the disc as "Violin Piece". Anyone know enough about this composition to add it to this page? pbryan (talk) 22:02, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gershwin Melody No. 40 (a.k.a. Violin Piece) 

message: I do not see Gershwin's song "Swanee," with lyrics by Irving Caesar, listed in this article. Published in 1919, it was his first big hit and purportedly his all time best seller. Rickbal (talk) 04:57, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It's there -- from 'Works featuring original Gershwin songs for shows by other composers': "1919 - Capitol Revue - "Come to the Moon" (lyrics by Lou Paley and Ned Wayburn); "Swanee" (lyrics by Irving Caesar)" AND "1920 - Sinbad - "Swanee" (lyrics by Irving Caesar). As performed by Al Jolson". So yeah. ♫ Melodia Chaconne ♫ (talk) 06:19, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gershwin's Song "Swanee" 
Talk:List of compositions by Giovanni Bottesini

message: There is in circulation a one-movement B minor concerto that is actually the F-sharp minor concerto's first movement, transposed.
My reference is a letter I wrote in June of 1979 shortly after having studied scores in the Ricordi archives
and in the Milan Conservatory. I have the letter, but don't know what good it would do to reproduce it here.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Treethinker (talk • contribs) 16:55, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  The B minor concerto 

message: Ali baba is listed as an Opera and under Orchestral as an Overture.
Let's eliminate the Orchestral listing? 190.109.64.39 (talk) 15:45, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ali Baba
Talk:List of compositions by Giovanni Pierluigi da Palestrina

message: Is the Mass for four voices on L'Homme armé, the Missa Quarta, also sometimes (confusingly) also called the Missa l'Homme armé (I think but am not sure that I've seen mentions of "Missa L'Homme armé à 4 and à 5, the Dover score on being clearly the à 5, the à 4 one being presumably the Missa quarta, the one performed by Pro Cantione Antiqua and broadcast some while back on Concertzender (listening to that archived broadcast now) being I'm guessing the à 4 since it does not match the score of the à 5)... or is the L'Homme Armé à 4 yet another work not listed (perhaps due to dubious sources)? Schissel | Sound the Note! 14:21, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Missa quarta