Talk:Star Wars Galaxies/Archive 4

message: If you're going to cite sources, cite them properly using the  and  templates. Jonawiki has created a lot of work for everyone with all of these improperly cited source's they've introduced in the last couple of days here. Beyond that, make sure your source is a reliable one as defined by WP:RS. We have a lot of cleanup work to do now. Roguegeek (talk) 23:22, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I will start trying to change the sources to the proper format, it will be slow going but it will get done.BaronJuJu 22:00, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proper citation 

message: Whatever other issues exist here, a large portion of this article needs cleanup and copyediting as it is not well written.--Isotope23 20:34, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, I recommend removing the rumor and conspiracy theory sections first. No real relevance to the current game.BaronJuJu 20:41, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Many citations use the url only format, and not the <ref=name></ref> format. Since the first citations use the more descriptive format, I think they all should. -Wizzard2k 21:28, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: I realize that no MMO has pissed off so many people, but people are letting their sheer hatred outweigh accurate information. I properly added and cited the most current batch of subscriber numbers - I certainly hope that they do not get deleted, and I hope that this page will have more integrity going forward. 206.222.52.18 15:17, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I modified the number to reflect 175K as stated in the MMOGchart SWG section. I also added the accuracy reference to show that these numbers are essentially "best guesses". While I don't agree that the subscriber number ssection should even be in this page, I agree it should be as accurate as possible. BaronJuJu 15:41, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

text: FWIW I believe the reason the numbers are so inaccurate now are due in part to the fact SWG was added to SOE's Station Access Pass, so many players who might have had multiple SOE accounts rolled them into one. -Wizzard2k 21:38, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Getting it right 

message: "And they should have gone for naught, because player Jedi had no business being in a game that was set during a period in the canon where there were no Jedi.[38]"
This statement is opinionated and is not fact. i suggest we remove it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.188.247.33 (talk • contribs).
It is a fact there were few jedi... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.89.50.200 (talk • contribs).
:It is fact that there were few known Jedi in the Jedi Order left. Also take into consideration the Grey Jedi existing the whole time. The only Jedi executed in Order 66 were the Jedi Council. NastalgicCam 18:09, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opinionated Statements 

message: metacritic has put several wrong links in this article and reference to have some pubs and increase its google rank.
If someone could clean this article it will be great. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 206.108.167.221 (talk • contribs).
:Care to point out examples? Roguegeek (talk) 11:35, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  spam need to be removed