lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:No Quarter: Jimmy Page and Robert Plant Unledded

message: I was one of the two didjeridu players on this video production. I would be grateful if my name (credited here) could be linked to my website: www.didjeridu.co.uk
Please contact me for any queries: sandy@didjeridu.co.uk92.238.36.56 (talk) 05:07, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  re "Sandy Lawson" 

message: Lacking reviews, especially critical reception at the time of debut. 
Jorel845 (talk) 00:54, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Critical Response
Talk:Stray Cats

message: This entire Wikipedia article seems to be very similar in wording to the copyrighted All Media Guide biography of the Stray Cats.
64.83.234.164 17:48, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright Violation? 

message: The article says Stray cats were heavily influenced by Bill Haley and the Comets. Strange that most of the interviews I recall tended to mention Eddie Cochran and Gene Vincent as being the primary influences. This would also explain the number of cover versions of Cochran and vincent tunes in the early days.
:as well as a song called 'Gene and Eddie'! 121.55.196.124 (talk) 07:09, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bill Haley????
Talk:International Association for Energy Economics

message: I am writing a short "non-copyright" page. MGTom 11:32, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

message: The intro and the History section are copy-paste from the www.iaee.org web pages. In addition to the implicit copyright of any work the iaee pages that were copied have an explicit copyright notice. JoeBrennan (talk) 14:41, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violation?
Talk:Mary Ellen Bamford

message: What were her birth and death dates?
* This page says 10 Dec 1857 - 21 May 1946.
* This page just says 1857 - 1946.
* This page, however, says 1877 - 1965.
Given that her first book was in 1886, that last link sounds unlikely. --Dori 11:34, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Dates of Birth, Death

message: The following was added to the article by  66.234.211.133 on 07:57, 13 July 2008. It's good stuff, but as it's not in encyclopedic format I've pulled it from the article and added it here. It'd be great if someone wants to look for reliable sources, write it up, and add it back to the main article. Dori (Talk • Contribs) 04:37, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits by [[Special:Contributions/66.234.211.133|66.234.211.133]]
Talk:Tagalog people

message: Similarities they're are both came from low land luzon 175.176.92.185 (talk) 23:59, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tagalog 

message: This is the talk page section for discussing whether or not this article is too long to read or edit (mostly edit) comfortably and what to split sections off into. Note that I've also added copy edit and expert needed tags. I'll be hands-off with discussion; good luck. Jarrod Baniqued (he/him) (talk) 06:05, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possibility of being too long
Talk:Pigs in a blanket

message: Would any one support a split of the article to Pigs in a blanket and Pigs in a blanket(UK) as they refer to fundamentally different recipes, one is about sausage wrapped in dough, the other is about sausage cooked in bacon. --Hq3473 (talk) 22:02, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Comment on old comment: That sounds like the Polish dish: Gołąbki, pronounced about gwumpke. 75.41.110.200 (talk) 17:40, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Split

message: Is the plural "pigs in blankets" or "pigs in a blanket"? 178.208.131.82 (talk) 14:15, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Pluralization

message: Pig in a blanket is pork wrapped in cabbage. That is a croissant dog, and it not necessarily pork. Most hot dogs are multi-meat.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.116.56.105 (talk) 15:18, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Where I come from, a hot dog wrapped and cooked in a croissant _is_ a "pig in a blanket", so you're incorrect. Lots of things are pigs in blankets. danzig138 (talk) 08:21, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  That isn't pig in a blanket 

message: Two different foods should be dealt in two different articles. I suggest that the article be splitted into Pigs in a blanket (United Kingdom) and Pigs in a blanket (United States) (or Pigs in a blanket (pastry)). --Scudsvlad (talk) 19:02, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The discussion has been open since December. If there is no further discussion I will be split the article. Spudlace (talk) 07:07, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

text: That is correct - I've never heard the British/Irish sausage and bacon thing called 'pigs in a blanket', it's always 'pigs in blankets'. Actually, even that name is probably less than 40 years old with the rise of supermarkets and Christmas catering - they were made long before that, but home cooks made their own, and they didn't really have a name. --Ef80 (talk) 18:54, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

text: @Tristanjlroberts Do you support the split if the splitted page (for the UK dish) gets the title Pigs in blankets? Because that would be nice. Scudsvlad (talk) 19:19, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Splitting proposal
Category talk:Storms

message: I'm trying to start a discussion here about the deletion of :Category:Storm. Back in September 2005 I moved several articles from :Category:Storms to :Category:Storm. I think the basis for this was that I was trying to separate the general "about types of storms and related stuff" articles from the historical "what happened in a particular storm" articles.
Now, going back to this several months later, I find that :Category:Storm has been deleted. Looking at the deletion log here didn't tell me much, so I had to rummage around the archives to find the debate here. The reason given was: "Category:Storms is used instead.".
I then wanted to check the history of :Category:Storm to see if I had put something on the category page explaining how it was supposed to be used, but unfortunately I can't do that because it has been deleted. It looks like people added stuff mostly to Category:Storms without realising that Category:Storm may have been more appropraite, and this led to the CfD listing when the clear separation began to blur once again.
So, after all that, I want to try and sort out is:
*Why was :Category:Storm deleted - the deletion debate explanation doesn't really satisfy me, as there seems to have been no consideration of why the separate category existed in the first place. It seems that the assumption was that these were duplicate categories. Would I be right to say that this assumption was wrong?
*What to do now? Recreating :Category:Storm is one possibility, but can anyone think of a better name for a category for the articles about the topic of storms, rather than the category for the history of storms? Maybe keep "storms" as the top-level category, and move all the "historical" articles to a suitable subcategory?
Any comments would be much appreciated. Thanks. Carcharoth 11:53, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The deleted category page contained only its parent categories until the deletion nominator tagged it for CfD and added This category is unused.  Use :Category:Storms instead. I'd assume the CfD voters thought it was a duplicate.  Looking at the situation now, it seems that :Category:Storms is mostly populated with articles about the topic of storms rather than individual historical storms while the subcategories of :Category:Storms include mostly historical events.   The parent category for historical events seems to be :Category:Weather events, so I'd suggest refactoring so that the events (by event type) are subcategorized directly under :Category:Weather events (skipping any intermediate storm or storms category), with :Category:Storms used for the general topic (types of storms rather than specific storms).  -- Rick Block (talk) 14:00, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I'll do that. Thanks for explaining that. Carcharoth 15:13, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Thanks, Rick, you beat me to the explanation.  --Kbdank71 17:35, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion of [[:Category:Storm]]
Talk:Garry Hobbs

message: Gareth Pelé? Source? Trampikey 11:56, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 12:14, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible sources for OOU section 

message: Trampikey has correctly identified that Enid may not be Garry's biological aunt, but I just wanted to mention her here so we don't forget about her, you never know when we'll need this information. She was mentioned in tonight's episode having sent Garry a birthday card. anemone│projectors 21:02, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Enid 

message: * - Groves compares Gary, talks about other things.
* - In depth interview about GaryRAIN*the*ONE BAM 01:34, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Robert Fassnacht

message: Robert Fassnacht was one of the few victims of the violent protests in the United States surrounding the Vietnam War. This is a very significant event in the history of the United States and he is a notable individual as a result. Many people are notable only because of their connection to one event. His connection to the Sterling Hall Bombing is covered in that article but that does not negate the value of this article.  That his entry is short is a result of two things:  1) his short and somewhat limited life:  he spent virtually every year of his life as a student.  and 2) his widow's ardent dedication to privacy.  None of this should mean that this article should be deleted.  Crunch 12:05, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Justification to keep this page 
Talk:Pandæmonium (Paradise Lost)

message: nope, leave it like this. good point of reference for people who want to know the etymology of the term.
* This definition sucks, as it makes no reference to Pan, the Greek with the goat trousers, from which "panic," also comes. Pan, meaning "all," comes from the Germanic "Pfanne."  Hosers!
:There is not enough information in the article to warrent its inclusion in WP, but the subject itself appears to be notable. I think a little work can be done to make it viable, but I definitely don't see the point in moving it Mrathel (talk) 17:48, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The proposal to move is NOT any kind of judgment on the quality of the article; it is only a suggestion that the article be located at a different title. Discussion should take place at Talk:Pandæmonium#Requested move. Propaniac (talk) 20:12, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Murphy Lee

message: Oppose.  Come on.  Murphy's Law (Murphy Lee album) went to #8 on the Billboard 200 and is certified Gold.  He's notable. 162 etc. (talk) 02:33, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I tend to agree with . A basic Google search shows plenty of WP:Reliable sources with significant coverage. Looks to me to meet WP:GNG. Though, I understand where the suggestion came from, as the article itself was/is in a pitiable state. I have added a blurb about his first and most popular album to the lead to show WP:Notability and removed the merge proposal banner. If someone with more rap knowledge wants to improve the sourcing that would be much appreciated. Thanks! Grey Wanderer (talk) 14:57, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge request?
Talk:Hanover, Pennsylvania

message: One of Hanover's primary industries Snyder's of Hanover maintains its german roots through its agressive marketing toward players of the card game Skat.  The name Synder may be a reference to Schnieder, a bonus or penalty awarded to the soloist in Skat when they either take more than 3/4 of the card points or less than 1/4 of the total points in a round.Watercat77 19:43, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  German Connection 

message: The South Western School Disctrict website verifies the spelling of "South Western" as two words. --Hojotoho (talk) 06:25, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Education 

message: This section needs some work. It currently is a list of external links to various companies' websites, a violation of WP:EXTLINKS and WP:NOTDIR. Any objections if I clean it up? Regards, P. D. Cook Talk to me! 16:05, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Hanover,_Pennsylvania#Places_of_interest|Places of interest]] 

message: This section reads like it was written by the local Chamber of Commerce and seems to violate WP:SOAP. There is very little information here that is unlike every American suburb or unique to this area. TBDuval (talk) 00:07, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Retail areas
Talk:Ted Alletson

message: copied from User talk:Motor 
Thanks for tips etc.
Alletson's a bit of an oddball, as he is only famous for what he did one day... other than that, he was one of life's failures, so copying the formatting from famous sportsmen profiles doesn't really seem to fit, to my way of thinking.
Then again, I'm the newbie!
Dweller 12:01, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I wouldn't create another article just for his innings yet. I noticed that you've added this article to List of cricketers... that'll probably bring a bit of attention from editors more familiar with the formatting and organisation of cricket articles. If that doesn't happen, then I recommend asking on Talk:List of cricketers for some advice. - Motor (talk) 12:39, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article formatting and style

message: I think it would help if the game situation was made clearer in this article. Am I correct in believing that Alletson ended not out and the match was drawn? TheGrappler 21:02, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Alletson was out for 189 and the match ended in a draw. It is believed that fielder was actually outside the boundary line when he took the catch. Tintin (talk) 05:30, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Game situation

message: AO Jones, the Notts skipper, tried to get Alletson to hit out again but he wouldn't.
Notts were in danger of losing the famous match.Alletson was essentially a fast bowler but his action was suspect.JimBakken (talk) 23:45, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alletson 

message: --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 08:46, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ooh look what I found!
Talk:Baron Grey of Ruthin

message: I'm generally in favour of trying to show the co-heirs by share where possible (as they are most likely to succeed with any termination of the abeyance) but I'm having some problems. The title falls back (after the deaths without issue of more recent terminations) on the decendants of the 2nd Marquess of Hastings.
He had 3 daughters with living issue (1/3 share each) Edith Maud Rawdon-Hastings, Countess of Loudoun | Lady Victoria Maria Louisa Rawdon-Hastings & Lady Frances Augusta Constance Muir Rawdon-Hastings:
*The first had a son then he had two daughters dividing their share into 1/6s. A whole 1/6th transferred to Viscount St Davids while the Countess's 1/6 was split between her 4 daughters giving them tiny shares each.
*Lady Victoria's 1/3rd appears to stay whole and decend through Mary Evelyn Bertha Emily Kirwan to Count Paul Lubienski Bodenham b. 1965.
*Lady Frances 1/3rd appears to stay whole and vest in (Lady) Anna Rhoda Marsham b. 7 Jun 1909 whose married status I'm not clear on. Failing her heirs it would fall on Sir Thomas Hare, 5th Bt and his daughters (of whom only one is certainly married and with a male heir.
Can anyone confirm that I have understood those correctly as if so we need to alter the article page (vide infra)
Alci12 12:19, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I note that one of the coheirs has just been deleted with the comment Deceased.  Should not her heirs be added, or is her heir already one of the coheirs? Peterkingiron (talk) 21:51, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It appears Lady Iona died without issue. Choess (talk) 03:40, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coheirs
Talk:Domino (card game)

message: It would be helpful if someone could explain the actual process of gameplay.  How are cards played?
204.128.192.4 00:20, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Entry doesn't cover gameplay experience 

message: I was introduced to this game through my wife's family (from Essex, though not sure where they learned it as her father's family reached London from Ireland via Canada). Their version starts with 7 of diamonds (rather than hearts) and you don't have to wait for the 8 to be played before playing a 6. 86.54.220.222 (talk) 22:11, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where it is played 

message: The article does not state what a player does on their turn. I mean, from this get the feeling that on a player's turn they play one card (as long as it is a legal move). In the version of the rules I've played, you can lay as many cards as you wish on your turn, if they can be played in sequence. Of course, this results in most people laying a single card on each turn regardless, usually up until their final turn when they can lay all remaining cards, in which they will---- rather than having to select a card to play each turn.
Is the as-many-cards a common rule in this game? 79.69.200.185 (talk) 23:02, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: cards per turn
Talk:Swedish Federation for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Rights

message: Shouldn't the title of this article be changed to Riksförbundet för Sexuellt Likaberättigande (the meaning of the acronym) or even something like Swedish Federation for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Rights (as RFSL translates their own name here)? Jobjörn 12:29, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Pro Milone

message: The Good article nomination for  has failed
:The article is unreferenced.  Worldtraveller 13:06, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Does it really need references? And what, references to chapters in the Pro Milone, precise references to Asconius' commentary...? I was going to add a few in, but it seemed rather pointless and superfluous given that this is just a general overview of the Pro Milone, nothing particularly specific. If I were attempting to explain its social and constitutional repercussions in the late Roman Republic, then yes, references would be helpful; so too if I was talking about the reasons for its more-regular-than-most analysis by academics; but as an overview I feel it pretty much stands for itself. Nevertheless, I'll add in some references when I have the time... Ω μα Δια!   Davers 14:58, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

text: It's close enough. :D I'll stick some Asconius chapter numbers wherever I can. As it's my first Wikipedia article I didn't realize that it was necessary to go so in-depth, especially offering references. Possibly some Quintillian stuff could be relevant? Di immortales! Davers 13:31, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:Good articles|Good Article]] [[Wikipedia:Good articles/Nominations|nomination]] has failed 

message: The  Latin phrase meaning "In time of war, the laws fall silent" was said by  Cicero in Pro Milone, according to Wikipedia, and phrased as "Silent enim leges inter arma". There should be a link, and the context of Cicero's expression should be briefly explored, either here or in that article. --Wetman 17:21, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Added. Hope it meets with your approval. I didn't want to go too in-depth but I agree that it deserved citing. Davers 14:53, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Inter Arma Enim Silent Leges]]

message: "Cicero even goes as far as to paint an amicable relationship with Pompey. Asconius, as he does with many other parts of the Pro Milone, disputes this fact, claiming that Pompey was in fact afraid of Milo, ..." Cicero claims that Milo and Pompey were friends. This is not a 'fact'. The only 'fact' involved here is the one that Cicero makes the claim.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pamour (talk • contribs) 21:03, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  use of language
Talk:Country Girl (Primal Scream song)

message: I thought official chart positions were only announced on Sundays? This was released yesterday and today is a Tuesday. aLii 12:35, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Chart position?

message: There is an awesome Black Sabbath song by the same name, I think if any of the two songs should get a page to itself then it should be Sabbath’s song. Its from
the album "Mob Rules"
====What about a disambiguator?====
Since this page is here already, I'd say: let's create a disambiguation page, listing both songs. Then a page about the song by Black Sabbath (which I agree is awesome! :)) will be needed.
Rafu 14:43, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Black Sabbath

message: Since this page is here already, I'd say: let's create a disambiguation page, listing both songs. Then a page about the song by Black Sabbath (which I agree is awesome! :)) will be needed.
Rafu 14:43, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What about a disambiguator?

message: any idea why the cover is the same as Chuck Prophet's Age of miracles? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 198.133.139.5 (talk) 15:50, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chuck Prophet 
Talk:And-inverter graph

message: This article could use a little bit of help. The first paragraph seems to be a contradiction; the first sentence describes a network, while the second describes the circuit being used as a data structure--which doesn't make sense, as a data structure is an abstract pattern while a digital network is a concrete computational unit. --Mikeblas 12:35, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup?

message: JA: A little bit of arrow-chasing reveals that the problem is worse than that.  Somebody, maybe in-divertently, maybe as a joke, created a redirect loop between digital circuit and digital electronics, and the page on digital network is just plain off-base from the normal use of that term.  Will work on fixing the mess.  Jon Awbrey 12:46, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup!

message: In the current version of the page, this sentence is a trainwreck:
"There is a growing understanding that logic and physical synthesis problems can be solved using AIGs simulation and boolean satisfiability compute functional properties (such as symmetries) and node flexibilities (such as don't-cares, resubstitutions, and SPFDs)."
Can somebody who thinks they understand what this sentence is supposed to be saying try to clean it up a little?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.0.49.227 (talk) 23:12, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The sentence was quoted literally from the ACM SIGDA article, indicating that the latter hadn't received too much attention. I tried to make the sentence syntactically correct with minimal changes, based on the abstracts of Bjesse.Borälv.2004 and Mishchenko.Zhang.Sinha.2006. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 12:28, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: What does this sentence mean?
Talk:Michael N. Barnett

message: Perhaps this kind of article would be better suited for your own info page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ivysaur (talk • contribs) 13:35, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Rotafix

message: it should be noted that the term "rotafix" comes from how it's named after the italian bike group that seems to be the main group of people using this method.  chaingang rotafixa. rotafixing is the verbed form.
: Is "Rotafix" a (registered) trademark, i.e. should it be "Rotafix™" or "Rotafix®"...?  If not a trademark, may "rotafix" rather than "Rotafix" be used...?  Regards, David Kernow (talk) 02:13, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  (Etymology) 

message: I put up a proposal for deletion for this article, because it is nonencyclopaedic, is a howto and is non-notable.  The article has since been edited, and now the tone is much better, but none of my objections have been really been dealt with.  It's still a howto on a non-notable subject, now it is just a better written one.  It would be far more at home on the [wikibook on bicycles].  There are a couple comments above stating the usefulness of this info, however they only serve to underline how it is a howto article and not a encyclopaedic one.  If it were housed on wikibooks it would be just a useful, and available, and it would be far more in context.  --Keithonearth (talk) 03:11, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  howto