Talk:Tekken 6

message: Will it be 720p on consoles? Recent rumors say not.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.118.10.62 (talk) 09:32, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The back of the PS3 box says 720p, as does my Sony Bravia. 86.14.47.193 (talk) 23:36, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resolution 720p? 

message: I think we should split up the playable characters with the non playable characters  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.55.202.251 (talk) 02:51, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Characters 

message: Wil Panda be in the Tekken 6 console version?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.55.202.251 (talk) 22:10, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Panda 

message: http://www.gamestop.com/Catalog/ProductDetails.aspx?product_id=75109 says the psp version is going to be realesed on november 3 2009  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.162.246.75 (talk) 22:28, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  realese date 

message: I thought the PSP version was going to feature all the updates of Bloodline Rebellion PLUS extra stuff not found in the console version. If Alisa and Lars are console only characters then shouldn't there be a link posted?
ASmiley (talk) 14:51, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Console Only Characters? 

message: Jinpachi Mishima isn't playable! He's still a Tekken 5 character! Lasttiger (talk) 20:42, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You can play as him in the PlayStation 3 version of Tekken 5: Dark Resurrection. Not the other ones. Erigu (talk) 07:49, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not all characters from Tekken 5 and Dr are playable 

message: In my opinion the "Gameplay" section needs to be fixed without having that huge box taking up so much space.  Adamdaley (talk) 04:49, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  I have fixed the box and grammer.  The information of the first paragraph needs to be verified against it's sources.  Adamdaley (talk) 04:57, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gameplay Section 

message: Despite all the good reviews, several fans of Tekken hated this game. I can see why, and although I don't actually hate it, I am disappointed in this installment.
The Top 6 Reasons for negative reception:
1. Horrible Online Lag (although this is being fixed in an upcoming patch for the game).
2. Virtually none of the fighting system changed from Tekken 5.
3. Questionably Long Loading Times.
4. Unfair Boss Battles. Jinpachi from Tekken 5 wasn't too much of a hassle, but if a lot of people are complaining about Nancy and Azazel, then I think the developers went overboard with them.
5. Scenario Campaign (a horrendously long, brutally difficult, and extremely repetitive beat-em-up) being the main portion of the game instead of Arcade Mode, which the game is supposed to be like.
6. Disappointing Character Endings. Face it, there were too many joke endings in the game, and most of them didn't even have anything to do with a character's main story. The endings were OK in Tekken 5, but this is unacceptable.
We put a negative reception portion in the Reception section a while ago, but then Wikipedia deleted it without giving a reason. Normally I like Wikipedia, but I hate when they act like this. I would like a valid reason as to why the negative reception was deleted in the first place, and I would like permission to repost it in the Reception section. 
People need to know the bad side of this game. If you need proof of it, ask ANYONE on the Official Namco-Bandai Forums and they'll gladly say why they hate the game.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.227.220.139 (talk) 13:21, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Somebody deleted all of that probably because "some fans on a messageboard" has absolutely no encyclopedic value and is not a valid source by any means. If you like this place, you should be aware of how it works, and what it is/isn't. And one of the things it isn't, is a place for a fan or fans to voice their dissatisfaction, valid as it may be.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.210.42.36 (talk) 16:16, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Negative Reception 

message: Tekken 6 has co-op just like scenario campaign, i think that shold be included............  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.4.109.214 (talk) 00:08, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  CO-OP 

message: Why is Bloodline Rebellion merged in T6 article? Both are different games as far as I am concerned. 112.198.79.68 (talk) 15:02, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bloodline Rebellion 

message: All of the numbers strongly indicate "mostly positive."  By definition, Metacritic aggregates the scores from a number of different sources.  That it has an 80 Metacritic score by definition means that, on average, the response has been mostly positive.  Similarly, all of the rest of the numbers are over 80%, some as high as 95% on their respective rating scales.  Yes, there are complaints (a whole paragraph of them) but the overall tone is more positive than mixed.  If you have some sort of numerical or other reliable reason to object, please explain here.  Qwyrxian (talk) 01:59, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mostly Positive vs. Fairly Mixed 

message: Whoever wrote the last part of the plot summary was obviously a Jin Kazama fanboy. I changed the Nina quote to make it more neutral, actually more accurate to the original ending. Plus, just to free himself of a silly little curse sounded like a pathetic excuse for Jin to cause all that trouble. If you watch this video, Jin talks a bit about how he hated corporate oppression of the people, and I expanded that to make it so he really was working for the greater good.
If you think I'm wrong and delete the addition, please explain why. 66.227.220.139 (talk) 21:30, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jin's Selfless Act? 

message: I check pages listed in :Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of :Tekken 6's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "ReleaseDate":
From Project X Zone: 
From Tekken 7: 
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 06:56, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphaned references in [[:Tekken 6]] 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Tekken 6. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090813233440/http://www.mcvuk.com/news/35343/Tekken-6-to-arrive-October-30th to http://www.mcvuk.com/news/35343/Tekken-6-to-arrive-October-30th
*Added  tag to http://www.e3.net/games/?game_id=26
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://andriasang.com/comvhq/namco_bandai_earnings/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:42, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Avoid reverting consecutively and avoid discussion. It could lead to a block. The cameo characters don't add anything to the characters section since we only post playable characters. It's pretty much WP:Fancruft as no regular reader would understand how are they related to the game. Same with Tekken 3, and its lack of narrative. Quit it with the reverts considering and lack of comments.Tintor2 (talk) 22:37, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems to be Gamecruft as it is just Excessive fictional detail listing all of the characters that made a brief appearance.  Spy-cicle💥  Talk? 22:49, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I will speak later, have just written a long text on another discussion page and have no strength or desire to express myself here. --- TheKerberos01 (talk) 00:50, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: There's no reason to stress over an article like this considering your edit summaries. Think about the guidelines and what articles should be looked as an example to follow. See Tatsunoko vs. Capcom: Ultimate All-Stars which became Featured. Better talk with a bigger group here until a consensus is formed.Tintor2 (talk) 00:24, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cameos