Talk:San Jose International Airport

message: I cant tell if the 45% in the 1st paragraph is correct or the 54% in market share.
Huskermax5 (talk) 01:01, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Error

message: Should this be moved to Mineta San Jose International Airport? The media seems to include his name in it now. --Jiang 06:19, 11 Jan 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: If the city has an accent mark in its name, does the airport? RickK 06:24, 11 Jan 2004 (UTC)
replies: text:  Let's just go by what its official website says. --Jiang 06:27, 11 Jan 2004 (UTC)

text:  It does have an accent. --Jiang 06:27, 11 Jan 2004 (UTC)

text: No one calls the airport by its full name. Reverted the page move --Jiang 05:10, 30 May 2004 (UTC)

text: What do think a redirect page is for? --James Anatidae 05:13, 30 May 2004 (UTC)

text: no.  It already redirects from Mineta San Jose International Airport and also from SJC Kgrr 07:13, 10 September 2005 (UTC)

text: I think the article name should reflect the official name of the airport, and have all previous names redirect to the new page. --Will74205 05:56, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Not sure why this page is titled for a name that's neither the official or brand name. San Jose International Airport isn't a name used anywhere. Airport master (talk) 23:41, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Article move?

message: Can someone post exterior and/or interior pictures of Terminal A and C? Construction pictures of the North Concourse would be good also. --Will74205 05:53, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Last time I was there, there wasn't really anything going on at all in terms of the construction of the North Concourse. It was just a fenced off area with construction trucks and whatnot. They've closed gate A1C, though, and when I go there, it's a nighttime. --User:butterfly0fdoom 16:43, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Pictures?

message: What is the history of SJC and 747s? That is how often have they landed there? and under what circumstances? Why don't the land there more often? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.254.97.10 (talk) 17:11, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Though the airliner runways 12L/30R and 12R/30L could handle the weight and are long enough, the compact layout of the runways and taxiways limit the wingspan of aircraft which can operate at SJC.  The largest is a Boeing 777.  American operated the daily non-stop flights to Tokyo using McDonnell Douglas MD-11 and later Boeing 777-200ER aircraft from 1992 to 2007.  And even then, aircraft as large as MD-11s or Boeing 757s can't operate on some adjacent taxiways when a 777 uses a taxiway or the runways.  See the wingspan restrictions at http://airnav.com/airport/KSJC (this page is a copy of federal publications about the airport).  Ikluft 18:39, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

text: I stand corrected.  I saw a Boeing 747SP take off from SJC at 4:18PM today (Nov 19, 2007).  This is an extremely rare event, though apparently not the first.  I looked up which plane it is on FlightAware.com and posted a screenshot so that it will be accessible here even after the web site where I got it expires the data about that flight.  With some net-sleuthing, some friends and I were able to determine this aircraft (previously N747FU, recently re-registered N747A) belongs to Fry's Electronics which is headquartered in San Jose.  I found a history of that airframe at 747SP.com.  It says N747A just got out of being repainted and overhauled on Oct 19 at San Bernardino CA and began making shakedown flights on Nov 9 following additional work in Victorville CA.   The FAA registration on N747A matches the street address of Fry's Electronics headquarters in San Jose.  In the process of looking for this, a friend also found photos of a previous 747-400 charter plane at SJC in Apr 2007 at airliners.net.  That page claims there was one previous 747 at SJC in the 1970's.  I noticed the airport publications at http://airnav.com/airport/KSJC now have new instructions for "unscheduled operations by Group 5 aircraft (B747) and larger" to contact the airport manager first.  And I checked the wingspan of a 747SP - it's 3 feet shorter than the 777-200ER which already operated out of SJC for the previously-mentioned Tokyo route.  Note that 747-300 and 747-400 models have wider wingspans, which will have some additional effect on airport operations whenever they are present.  So this changes the previous answer - 747's are still rare at SJC but now they're on the menu. Ikluft (talk) 04:33, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

text: Additional reference: "San Jose Ballet's head-turning move", San Jose Mercury News, Nov 21, 2007.  See the quote of an airport spokesman at the end of the article about two previous 747 landings at SJC before N747FU landed twice on Nov 19.  So the total 747 landings at SJC appears to be 4, and will now go up with each return of N747FU. Ikluft (talk) 01:57, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Spotted a pair of Delta 747 on the GA side a few years back.  Military charters for both, by the flight numbers. 184.23.131.229 (talk) 04:12, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

text: 747-8F has landed (video here) ... super bowl 50 charter (video) ... and a blurb about the military charters... 2x/yr.  One also brought Indian Prime Minister Modi on his visit to Silicon Valley. 184.23.131.229 (talk) 09:36, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  747 landing at San Jose 

message: I see on the revision history that there seems to be disagreement over which gates are remaining and which were removed at Terminal C for the Terminal B construction.  Let me point out the updated map of SJC Terminal C shows the terminal now has gates C1 to C14.  Whoever keeps saying that C12, C13 and C14 have been demolished, please wait until that happens.  Yes, eventually all of the current Terminal C (the original San Jose Municipal Airport terminal) will be demolished.  But let's keep an accurate pace with it.  Ikluft (talk) 05:03, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The Feb 8 construction update also addresses the Terminal C partial demolition to make room for Terminal B construction.  Some gates were relocated. Ikluft (talk) 19:03, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Demolition of part of Terminal C 

message: I added a pic of Terminal B departure hall, but the format is still bad. If someone with knowledge could look into this, I've run out of time. Mgw89 (talk) 06:38, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image formatting 

message: I've been looking at San Francisco International Airport's Wikipedia page and comparing it to Mineta San Jose International Airport's Wikipedia page. I noticed that right next to the destinations on SFO's page it has the terminals locations instead of the seperate airport dest lists. I propose that we make one huge dest list with all of the airlines, destinations and terminals. If you don't what I'm saying look at the examples below.
New Proposed version(example)
American Airlines| Dallas/Fort Worth, Chicago O'Hare |   A  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmumman (talk • contribs) 06:13, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Airport dest list 

message: On some other airports' it has destinations for cargo airlines. If you look at McCarran International Airport in Las Vegas, they have a dest list for cargo airlines. I propose we make another airport dest list for cargo airlines. Other airports that have dest lists for cargo that I know of are Narita International Airport and Delhi International Airport. I know that very few airports have this, but we should make a dest list for cargo airlines too.
New proposed dest list(example)
FedEx Express| Memphis, Indianapolis
UPS| Louisville, Ontario
Air Transport International| Toledo, Sacramento, Chicago/Rockford - Jmumman(Talk)
:Cargo destination lists are not easily verifiable. (Cargo doesn't care or know how it gets from point A to point B, and shippers don't care [critically] whether it takes 14 hours or 20 hours.) Cargo carriers are OK, but destinations, I think not. HkCaGu (talk) 08:45, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cargo Airport Dest List 

message: I went to Mineta San Jose Int'l Airport yesterday, and I saw that there were flights coming from Tucson, and Colombus. I was looking at the arriving flights and it said that both flights from Colombus and Tucson were operated by Southwest Airlines. Were those flights charters? On FlightAware it didn't say anything about those flights, I don't know if those flights were charters. Can someone please go to Mineta San Jose International Airport's Terminal A, and look at the screen where it has arriving and departing flights and see if those flights exist?
* Those aren't on Southwest's route map.  What can happen sometimes (and probably happened in that case since there was weather that day) is a flight may skip a stop where it will not be able to land, so that passengers for following stops don't also have to be delayed and the plane and crew can continue with the schedule where they need to be. For example, last year I heard on the radio that San Jose Tower asked a Southwest flight going to Little Rock if that was a new route.  The pilot answered that they were supposed to go to Vegas first - but the Vegas airport was closed for snow.  So they were going direct to their next stop. Ikluft (talk) 21:29, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other destinations 

message: I think we should make a section called Former Hub For... on the article. Considering that SJC was a former hub for American Airlines and Reno Air, I think people who read SJC's article should know that. I propose a section called Former Hub For...
Here's is probably what it would like(example)
Former Hub For...
American Airlines- ? year-? year
Reno Air- ? year-1999  
--Jmumman (talk) 03:24, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Former Hub For... 

message: I know that Frontier Airlines will end it's San Jose-Denver service. When Frontier Airlines pulls out of SJC, will Frontier take Republic Airlines with it?  --Jmumman (talk) 22:10, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Frontier Pulling Out of SJC 

message: I hear "CP Air" is going to start service from Carlsbad to SJC sometime in April 2011. Anyone have the specific date?
--Jmumman (talk) 21:57, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  California Pacific Airlines 

message: can anyone find an updated FAA diagram (the current one has Terminal C on it from 2005)? I've tried searching but haven't found one yet.
Gamer9832 (talk) 14:36, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  FAA airport diagram 

message: Alaska Airlines has just recently announced San Jose-San José del Cabo. Alaska Airlines is in Terminal B at SJC, but since the flight is going to be international won't the flight have to go in Terminal A's International Arrivals?
--Jmumman (talk) 18:48, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alaska Airlines goes international at Mineta San Jose Intl Airport 

message: I've found this page has information about SJC's busiest routes, on-time percentages, etc. We should use this info in some way. I don't know how we should use this info, but here's the link, Click here
--Jmumman (talk) 02:51, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Busiest routes etc. 

message: I see in the text "In November 2001, the airport was renamed after Norman Yoshio Mineta, who is a native of San Jose, its former mayor and congressman, former United States Secretary of Commerce and former United States Secretary of Transportation. In December 2003, the airfield was named after former mayor Ernie Renzel.[13]"
In the article about Renzel, the date stated is 2004.  In fact, the sentence in the article explains the distinction better...
How 'bout I fix that up?  Any opposition?
JByrd (talk) 19:08, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Airport/Airfield/Renzel 

message: The bit under incidents about AirCal 336 cleared for rwy 19R, landing on 19R, etc. can't be correct - SJC has no 19R.  Was there ever a 19R at SJC?  I doubt it - SJC is surrounded by highways and railways.  Titaniumlegs (talk) 08:01, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind - AirCal 336 was landing at John Wayne (SNA).  Reading comprehension.  However, this makes it a flimsy connection to SJC, given that the flight merely departed SJC, and the incident took place entirely at SNA.  Titaniumlegs (talk) 08:05, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  AirCal 336 on Runway 19R? 

message: in Sept 2009 the runway 11/29 was announced to be temporarily closed for 90 days; and then subsequently was never re-opened, instead the closure was continued until finally the runway was permanently closed and incorporated in a new widened taxiway W on the west-side of runway 30L. 
This closure was effectively closing the only general aviation runway in San Jose.
Thetilo (talk) 03:03, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Runway 11/29 Closure 

message: At some point, the homes in the area between hwy 87, hwy 880 and Coleman Road were all moved out because of overhead air traffic. I am curious when this happened. I'm sure there is a story there. Kortoso (talk) 00:29, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moving nearby homes 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on San Jose International Airport. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120304102307/http://www.sjc.org/about/newsroom/2010_releases/leed.htm to http://www.sjc.org/about/newsroom/2010_releases/leed.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:55, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: There is major construction going on on the west (general aviation) side of the airport.  See this article - http://www.flysanjose.com/fl/about/newsroom/2013_releases/WestSide.htm.  Somebody should update this article to mention it.  Cloudswrest (talk) 18:01, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  West Side Project 

message: I believe it is premature to mark this route as being discontinued based on the dubious and threadbare content in the reference that is being used for it. The reference has no comment from either Air China or the airport and appears to consist entirely of a quick analysis of changes in OAG or the airline's reservation system. Both OAG and the booking system are likely to change for many reasons at random and I don't believe it should be taken by itself as an indication of whether or not the route is suspended or cancelled. This is a very high-profile route for San Jose airport, so something as important as a Chinese airline pulling out would undoubtedly be reported by a more reliable and reputable source than some random blog. No one in any official capacity to comment on the status of this route is quoted. I propose we leave things as they were prior to KLM's edit until we have a better source for any changes to the route. --Resplendent (talk) 23:09, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Air China Service Status 

message: Just to help other editors recognize this, we seem to have a vandal who has been changing, among other recurring erroneous edits, the infobox "operator" field to read variations of San Jose Airport Commission or sometimes San Jose Airport Authority. It isn't clear why the anonymous editor has a fixation on this. Based on the other false edits from the anonymous IP, it's probably just meant to look plausible to delay getting reverted. The correct value for the "operator" field is to leave it blank because the owner (City of San Jose) is also the operator. The San Jose Airport Commission is a panel of advisors appointed by the City Council but with no actual authority. The City Council has authority at SJC. This incorrect edit caught my attention because I have served on the San Jose Airport Commission before. (If that's something that interests you, they accept applications from San Jose residents whenever there are openings.) You can verify it yourself at the city's "Airport Commission" page. Ikluft (talk) 23:28, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  San Jose Airport Commission is not the airport authority 

message: Hey everyone! Check out the new domestic destinations. The period from November 2018-October 2019 came out today  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.207.182.194 (talk) 18:28, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Busiest Domestic Destinations statistics 

message: Hey everyone, it seems that a user has been engaging in an edit war on this article page (Norman Y. Mineta San Jose International Airport), as well as the Delta Air Lines page regarding the status of SJC as a Delta focus city. The consensus from airline editors is that the airport is not a Delta focus city as of early 2020, and we've addressed this previously on the Delta Air Lines talk page and hidden text. Recently, the aforementioned editor has repeatedly added edits with poor spelling and sourcing, and despite being warned with no penalty, he/she engages in re-adding the deleted edits over and over again. This user seems to have a history of doing such actions to other pages, and has not responded to prior conversations on their user talk page as well. We ask for assistance in this regard to ensure the "no original research policy", as well as Wikipedia admins to escalate this case. Thank you.
Theoldkinderhook (talk) 09:23, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Comment: Here are four potential sources I found doing a simple Google search - Potential Source 1, Potential Source 2 (Paywall), Potential Source 3 Potential Source 4 Would any/all of these be considered sufficient? --Resplendent (talk) 15:28, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

text: Reply: For these articles, only earnings calls, direct interviews with top-level senior executives, and direct primary sources count. Unlike other airlines, Delta has a unique definition for what they define as a focus city. For instance, the current Delta focus cities (Cincinnati-Northern Kentucky and Raleigh-Durham) have flights to other Delta hubs and each other, as well as upwards of 7-10 additional flights to "spoke" airports. Some destinations, like Cancun, Las Vegas, and Orlando, are omitted in this list of "spoke" airports, as they are primarily leisure destinations. So far, SJC lacks the flight capacity to be a focus city, and there are no primary sources from Delta stating that it is one. As far as the sources you've kindly provided, it appears that a quote from a Delta official was blown out of proportion, as she was speculating/suggesting about what airports could be focus cities in the future. Theoldkinderhook (talk) 04:51, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disruptive editing/Adding of SJC as Delta Air Lines focus city 

message: So at this point there has been no announcement for when the routes I removed will be launched or resumed (or that they have permanently been discontinued). While airline websites seem to be our only source right now for a lot of this information instead of a more reputable news article, I think we need to set some kind of barometer for when they should be removed/re-added instead of just "it shows up as available on a booking engine/airline website for some date in the future."
Granted, this would mean anything not actively flying right now could be potentially removed, but there has to be a middle ground between "needs a news article citation" and "is or isn't available to book on an airline's website". --Resplendent (talk) 20:19, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Please remember Wikipedia is not a directory. There is no encyclopaedic requirement that every detail is absolutely up-to-date, I would just leave detail as it is until it becomes obvious it is either gone or staying.Andrewgprout (talk) 02:20, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  COVID-Related Route Suspensions/Discontinuations 

message: During the pandemic SJC lost the position it briefly held (in 2018 and 2019) as the second busiest airport in the Bay Area, seeing fewer passengers than OAK in both 2020 and 2021 (and also most years before 2018). In 2021 SJC saw 7,357,441 passengers, OAK saw 8,142,320 passengers, and SFO saw 24,343,627. This means the article should be updated to reflect that SJC is the third busiest airport in the Bay Area, probably with a note that SJC and OAK have jockeyed for the position in recent years. I'll make the update this weekend unless someone has a good reason we should leave as is. If it had historically been the second busiest airport I could see leaving it for now considering the pandemic, but it has not been and OAK saw a more rapid increase in passenger traffic by % growth than either SJC or SFO in 2021. --Cowboywizard (talk) 23:35, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  SJC is no longer the Bay Area's second busiest airport