lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Patricia Broadfoot

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. --KenWalker | Talk 04:40, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Azumanga Daioh Original Soundtrack, Volume 1

message: The track listing is how it is written on the album, not on the official website (which doesn't seem to support unicode). Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 15:21, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: First header
Talk:Patricia Churchland

message: I added her to the neuroscientists category at Commons, but noticed she wasn't included here. Richard001 (talk) 03:02, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neuroscientist? 

message: Hi all editors.  I'm working on a thorough revision of this article that will add new sections for biography, philosophy, and Awards and Honors, and perhaps more if I come up with it.  I'd be happy for help!  My only request is that we collaborate on it, as I'm putting this together in my sandbox at the moment. --Grapplequip (formerly LAR) (talk) 20:08, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major Revision 
Talk:Martyrs of Gorkum

message: Please conform to the guidelines and normal usage. The references section is supposed to be called "references", nothing else. Sources and references are the same thing. Either say "this article incorporates text etc.", or give the link, or both (even if they are the same, you're not contradicting, only giving more information). The way it is now is confusing. And please go to the talk page instead of reverting, it's very impolite. And I had noticed that it was the same source. Piet 15:22, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: If they were executed on 9 July, how is it possible that they "arrived at Brielle 13 July" ??? I realize that's what the Catholic Encyclopedia source says, but it certainly doesn't make any sense. howcheng  {chat} 21:01, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates 

message: I see 1865 here, but the article for Nicholas Pieck, one of these martyrs, says 1867.  Please reconcile, and put a note in this talk section when that's done.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.63.16.20 (talk) 15:22, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: While a number of sites mention 1865, I suspect they got their information from this article. Oxford Reference says 1867. More persuasive in an article regarding a picture commissioned for the canonization, "...as part of the grand celebrations to mark the 1800th anniversary of the martyrdom of Peter and Paul AD67. Have changed it to 1867. Mannanan51 (talk) 04:28, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year they were canonized
Talk:Pain for Pleasure

message: Ehm... update this. --Scotteh 15:22, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "Pain For Pleasure started after Steve Jocz wrote the lyrics to Pain for Pleasure in five minutes while taking a crap..." -- I mean WTF?? --Scotteh 17:27, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Update

message: Pain For Pleasure was formed as itself in 2000 when Sum 41 were looking for a way to play metal and punk because the musical preferences of the members of the band... what is that about Pain is dead and that they formed en 1960s, the article also talks about hippies... I don't understand
*In the free dvd which came with the special edition version of 'Does this look infected' it had a documentary on Pain for Pleasure. It explains that they met at a hippie commune and that Pain died in hoping to become a legend, but he failed to come back to life Khurs (talk) 17:19, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: this 'Documentary' was fictional. [The Spooky One] | [t c r] 05:32, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I am aware. The part of 1960 formation was to do with the fictional side.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Khurs (talk • contribs) 21:46, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  ¿? 

message: "Reportedly, Pain is dead now with Pleasure's departure being described as him being "nowhere to be seen"." 
Eh? What is that supposed to mean? I didn't see any mention of Pain or Pleasure being actually people.... 75.177.131.250 (talk) 03:03, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eh? 

message: this article really needs to be re-written. With a new lead and a new body section. - -[The Spooky One] | [t c r] 20:01, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite

message: This article's content would be more useful in Sum 41 than as a freestanding article. Pain for Pleasure seems to lack notability separate from Sum 41. To quote the description on (the now-deleted) :File:Painforpleasure.jpg,...they are an alter-ego band, who doesn't play live. They are featured in a Mockumentary on a bonus DVD from a Sum 41 album. This is really the only coverage they have had.If this is correct, the treatment of Pain for Pleasure as a separate entity may be an in-joke, and therefore not suited to a freestanding article on Wikipedia. Regardless, this article would still fail WP:GNG (and probably WP:MUSIC) due to lack of coverage in independent, third party sources. / edg ☺ ☭ 12:16, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. The alter-ego band is not notable enough to have its own article. I'm fine with merging it with Sum 41. Timmeh! 20:02, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Beguiler

message: As written this is too dependant on a knowledge of D&D terminology. RJFJR 15:23, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that a certain amount of "insider" knowledge is required on some page... The alternative choice is to flag every single insider word and each have its own page which would clutter things immensely. I've gone and cleaned up some of the more "esoteric" references and tried to make things more generic. --Laxrulz777 18:14, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Terminology
Talk:Timeline of Chinese astronomy

message: Could someone with some expertise take a look at this UNESCO Courier article, "The observation of sunspots - history of Chinese science", it seems the first observation of sunspots occurred earlier than 28 BC. -MrFizyx 15:23, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  History of [[Sunspots]] 

message: I suspect this article could be further improved if someone were to fact check the unreferenced claims. Specifically, I think that the earliest record of meteor showers likely predates 687 AD by quite a lot -- the Perseids have been observed for around 2000 years, for example, and I found a website (http://www.essortment.com/all/meteorshowersl_rmmu.htm) that says the Lyrids were 1st observed in 15 BC! Also, 2 dates are given for earliest record of solar eclipse: Oct. 22, 2137 BC (surprisingly accurate!) and 776 BC; both can't be right.DoctorEric (talk) 17:47, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Redundant and Questionable Data

message: "613 BC - In July, a Comet, possibly Comet Halley, is recorded in the Spring and Autumn Annals (秋七月，有星孛入于北斗)."
Halley's comet did not appear in 613BC Wikitrumpets (talk) 22:19, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Halley's Comet
Talk:Patricia Hodge

message: Just corrected the parents' details. The article claimed that Eric was the 'owner / manager' of the Royal Hotel and Marion simply his wife. In fact the sources say that Eric and Marion were joint manager and manageress. They did not own the Royal, which originally belonged to the Great Central Railway, then the LNER after Grouping, then British Rail in 1948. It was bought from the British Transport Commission in 1949 by Hewitt Brothers, the big Grimsby brewery. Hewitts was taken over by United Breweries in 1960 and United merged with Charringtons in 1962. In 1964 the Royal -- where Edward VII and Queen Alexandra once stayed as Prince and Princess of Wales -- was closed and demolished to make way for the Cleethorpe Road flyover. The Hodges were seemingly the last managers. https://www.grimsbytelegraph.co.uk/news/nostalgia/last-orders-at-the-royal-702766 
http://breweryhistory.com/wiki/index.php?title=Hewitt_Brothers_Ltd Khamba Tendal (talk) 17:18, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parents
Talk:Patricia Hollis, Baroness Hollis of Heigham

message: The only source I can find is the one: originally given by User:Drimze, from the much-hated Daily Mail. Is there any better one, or should that section be deleted as being unsourced for a year? Martinevans123 (talk) 13:36, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Alan Howarth, Baron Howarth of Newport|Howarth]] "controversy" 

message: Now that the Baroness is no longer with us, questions of political infleunece are less important. If anyone does have time to attend to sourcing, could they also therefore improve the chronology, please? The fact someone stood for election and lost really isn't the primary importance, unless it is, making the question whether she even deserves a meme more relevant.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.250.135.238 (talk) 13:15, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chronology
Talk:William Congreve

message: I think the controversy regarding the correct wording of his most famous line (is it "savage breast" or "savage beast") is merited.  
Mal7798 14:02, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: ''Breast'' or ''Beast''

message: "Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned" - they always taught us it was from William Shakespeare! 93.219.142.144 (talk) 06:29, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: And they taught you wrong, I'm afraid.  This line is frequently and widely attributed to Shakespeare, but that is wrong. BabelStone (talk) 13:41, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hell hath no fury - I thought it was from Shakespeare 

message: It is generally  understood that William Congreve was born in Cork, Ireland where his father was working and that he was not born in Yorkshire as he claimed.
It is also believed that he was born in 1672 and not in 1670.
An interesting link regarding this is www.irishwriters-online.com/congrege-william/
I suggest that perhaps the article should be amended to reflect the doubt regarding his place and date of birth.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beanneadair (talk • contribs) 12:53, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: That page simply states that he "was born in 1672, not 1670 and not at Bardsley, near Leeds in England, as he claimed" without giving any evidence or citing any source.  I have done a Google Books search and I cannot find any source that corroborates the doubts about his place and date of birth. I don't think we can add this to the article unless there is a reliable source to back it up. BabelStone (talk) 16:05, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

text: Upon further investigation, it seems that Samuel Johnson doubted Congreve's claim to have been born in Bardsey, Yorkshire ("Neither the time nor place of his birth are certainly known; if the inscription upon his monument be true, he was born in 1672. For the place; it was said by himself, that he owed his nativity to England, and by every body else that he was born in Ireland."), and berated him for disowning his native country (see here).  However, Edmond Malone later found a baptism entry for Congreve in the Register of Bardsey, in the West Riding of York that would seem to prove that he was not lying when he said he was born in England: "William, the sonne of Mr. William Congreve, of Bardsey grange, was baptised Feb. 10, 1669 [i.e. 1670 by the modern reckoning of the new year]" (see here and here).  I suspect that Samuel Johnson is to blame for the continuing belief amongst some that he was born in Ireland.  I think it is worth adding a note about this to the article. BabelStone (talk) 13:14, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I have now added such a note. BabelStone (talk) 13:35, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Place & Date of Birth
Talk:Patricia Ireland

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. --KenWalker | Talk 00:52, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: Photo is not of Patricia Ireland YettaGratch (talk) 17:47, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo 

message: Reference to The Advocate article is inaccurate YettaGratch (talk) 17:49, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccurate Biography 

message: Patricia Ireland has been blocked; she has never edited an entry or interacted on Wikipedia in any way YettaGratch (talk) 17:50, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Patricia Ireland Blocked
Talk:Image gradient

message: I found the definition of the gradient to need further clarification:
The gradient of an image is given by the formula :
:\nabla f=\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}\hat x + \frac{\partial f}{\partial y}\hat y,
where :
:\textstyle\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}  is the gradient in the x direction
:\textstyle\frac{\partial f}{\partial y} is the gradient in the y direction.
For instance:
What is \hat x?
What is \hat y?
Are these unit vectors?
And, should there be a link to computing the discrete gradient for the definition of the gradient for the x and y directions?
I was honestly confused here.
FAdmMatt (talk) 07:46, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing 

message: This article contravenes the convention that "dark" image regions represent "low" values and "bright" image regions represent "high" values.  Should simply reverse the sense of these words and the accompanying graphic.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Kennyhunt (talk • contribs) 16:24, August 17, 2006
:This has recently confused a poster to the sci.image.processing newsgroup, so this certainly needs fixing. I suggest somebody copy the images used and take their negative. Then it will make sense. HairyWombat (talk) 14:21, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  From white to black 

message: These two articles give different names to the same thing.  As gradient is the more common term, they should be merged here, and color progression change to a redirect. --jacobolus (t) 21:56, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Changed #REDIRECT at Color progression from this article to the article Color gradient. This is more appropriate, as this article isn't really anything to do with colour. HairyWombat (talk) 01:53, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge from color progression 

message: "The Sobel operator represents a rather inaccurate approximation of the image gradient"
The image gradient is the gradient of an assumed (not uniquely defined) function.
What does it mean to be inaccurate? Surely we can construct a continuous function that takes on the discrete pixel values and matches the sobel derivative, then the sobel value would be exact and anything else would be inaccurate.
That statement needs to be cited and explained or removed.  Likewise
"It turns out that the derivatives at any particular point are functions of the intensity values at virtually all image points"
is nonsense without some further assumption about the nature of the assumed continuous function.
99.56.163.151 (talk) 23:23, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I tend to agree with both of these criticisms - from what I have read, Sobel is not an accurate way to detect edges... but edge detection is not what this article is about. And as you mentioned, the gradient is not globally dependent in the general case. I will remove the second sentence and rewrite the first. Smitty121981 (talk) 15:21, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  inaccurate ??
Talk:Patricia Lynne Duffy

message: Oddly, this article does not mention Duffy is a synaesthete, although Synaesthesia#Grapheme_.E2.86.92_color_synesthesia does.—msh210℠ 21:33, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have so far been unable to find evidence that APA Review of Books is an actual publication.  Please help if you are able. 
Cerebrum appears to be a publication put out by the Dana Foundation.  
Some of the article wording is lifted directly from the subject's website and will need rewriting.  Kirby777 (talk) 03:58, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Publications
Talk:Patricia Manterola

message: Patricia Manterola was NOT born in 1970. She was born on April 23, 1972. Among others, the following well known websites so prove it:
http://www.grandesestrellas.com/estrellas/patricia-manterola/
http://entretenimiento.univision.com/celebridades/article/2010-07-01/bio-patricia-manterola
http://www.ideasnopalabras.com/2010/04/efemerides-musical-dia-23-de-abril/
http://www.biografias-de.com/patricia-manterola
http://www.imdb.es/name/nm0005184/
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0005184/
http://www.askmen.com/celebs/women/actress/patricia-manterola/index.html
http://especiales.tvn.cl/festivaldevina/2009/galerias.aspx?IdC=32929
Rafa XIII (talk) 18:08, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year of birth of Patricia Manterola
Talk:Patricia Morrison

message: "Claiming that monies were not paid as due from Eldritch". Sure, "monies" is a real word, but isn't it supposed to be used for example if you talk about several different types of currency? Not, as here, when discussing payments at several different occasions. Well, I guess Patricia might have been (not) payed in both pounds and dollars but wouldn't "money" be better? Just a thought - no biggie.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.114.47.83 (talk) 21:34, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Money vs Monies

message: I can't find collaboration on the statement that Gray left The Damned because he was injured by a fan.  I did find a statement indicating that he was dismissed because of an on-stage tantrum in 1996 at:
http://www.answers.com/topic/the-damned-band
Perhaps both are true?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by CLSwiki (talk • contribs) 19:01, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Morrison joins the Damned & Paul Gray's departure? 

message: The main text states, "Morrison played on ... The Sisters of Mercy's 1987 album Floodland [13][14][15] ...", but I can't see anything in these references stating she played bass on the album. 143.117.195.67 (talk) 13:23, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It would be good to find an interview where she states categorically that she did play and/or write on the album. 82.71.31.179 (talk) 18:16, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Morrison on Floodland
Talk:Tricia Nixon Cox

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. --KenWalker | Talk 19:09, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
* Oppose - There is already a redirect page at Tricia Nixon that points here, it's not appropriate to change the canonical article to use a common form of her name RainbowCrane  | Talk 20:00, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *Actually, that would be appropriate, per WP:UCN. Support move. Dekimasuよ! 15:15, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Patricia Paay

message: The vast majority of this article covers several different threads of information that contain no sources at all, let alone proper references to the information cited. For example, the information about her youth, family lineage, marriage, career details, etc., contain no references and there is no easy way for the reader to determine if the details are legitimate.
Furthermore, some of the information is pertaining to other people, such as Adam Curry and their daughter Christina Curry. Information about these other people, beyond their mere identities and relationship to the subject, does not belong on this page and should be moved elsewhere, if valid.
In summary, this is a biographical article and is supposed to be held to high standards. It has been marked as lacking proper references since February, 2010. Nearly five years later, this has still not been done! Also, I can see where many edits of this page have occurred since that time, but the edited data is still mostly lacking of citations. If proper references are not added within the near future, I will take it upon myself to remove the potentially invalid information (whole sections, if appropriate) which is in violation of the guidelines.
I welcome comments about this. FCGreg (talk) 10:10, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggesting deletion of majority of this article 

message: The Dutch version of this page implies that there is/was some controversion over whether or not Paay actually is Honey Bee. It doesn't make it clear what the details are, but states the singles credited as Honey Bee are actually by Ans de Bie. I found this link: http://www.discogs.com/artist/2043051-Ans-De-Bie
Perhaps some fraud by Paay; perhaps just misreading by an overzealous fan. Honey Bee/Honey Pie. An easy mistake.
Paay/Pie and Bie/Bee would certainly make punny sense to me 87.208.70.193 (talk) 19:52, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Honey Bee
Talk:Patricia Tallman

message: Ms Tallman has played many uncredited roles. Look out for her in the first Austin Powers Movie. Ms Tallman walks up to Austin at the beginning of the movie in the dancing scene. Austin punches her to the floor. Ms Tallman spoke of filming The Living dead Movie; 'There was this Extra who was in full Zombie makeup following me all around between shoots saying "we're coming to get you Barbara, Barbara we're coming to get you"'. Director Tom Savini spoke of watching Ms Tallman perform some of her stunt work; 'I've seen her jumping into freezing cold water from a height, I tell you I felt cold just watching her hit that water'. She works with charities helping children.Johnwrd (talk) 23:26, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure why this info is included here, it's too trivial for the main article and is all unsourced. I have removed some of what you've added per WP:BLPNAME. --Jezebel'sPonyoshhh 15:05, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia 
Talk:Patricia Wrightson

message: The second and third sentences of the lead quote the second and third sentences of the obituary by Julia Eccleshare (ref name=Guardian). The source is cited at that point but the material is neither paraphrased nor marked as quotation. I haven't looked further. 
The caption of the photograph that heads the obituary is "Patricia Wrightson was accused of exploitation." That pertains to her use of Aboriginal legends: ... "As fashions changed, she later received criticism for doing so." That deserves some coverage here --and also in our book article The Nargun and the Stars, of course. 
--P64 (talk) 19:16, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of source [ref name=Guardian]
Talk:Patricia Zentilli

message: Could use a photo.64.131.176.162 03:45, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I used to email her, and she sent me an autographed 8x10.  She was really nice to me.  I was on her short list of myspace friends once, and I made the mistake of asking if she had auditioned for "Monk," which I thought she would have been perfect for.  She immediately dropped me as a friend.  :-(  184.15.255.48 (talk) 22:21, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: I think Patty auditioned for Monk
Talk:Patricio Patrón Laviada

message: There is a note from the Mexican Daily "El universal", (In Spanish)where Patricio Patron Laviada and his brother Alejandro Patron Laviada are linked to drug trafficking. 
In the note, talk about an inform from  the Pentagon an  DEA : "Caballero Andante", where, Alejandro has identified with the alias "La Vaca", ("The Cow"). 
This information its very important, isn it? Armando  201.103.154.71 (talk) 22:24, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  nexus with drugs trafficking.