Talk:Prospect Bluff Historic Sites

message: Confused.  The last section says that the U.S. built a new fort on the site of the old Negro Fort in 1818, and named it Fort Gadsden.  However, when they destroyed it two years earlier it was in Spanish territory.  According to Wikipedia's History of Florida, the U.S. didn't cut a deal for Florida until 1819 and didn't take ownership until 1821.  So ---- did we just up and build a fort on foreign territory?  If so, it seems to me that would require an explanation, like "In spite of Spanish ownership of the grounds, the U.S. built ...... etc."  Or is the date wrong?  Whatever it is, it seems like there's more of a story to be told regarding the politics of how Ft. Gadsden came to be built.  69.229.127.207 13:53, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rebuilt fort 

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class.  Referencing and appropriate inline citation guidelines not met.    --dashiellx (talk) 15:26, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Fort Gadsden. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927042842/http://tps.cr.nps.gov/nhl to http://tps.cr.nps.gov/nhl
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070605234857/http://www.history.navy.mil/faqs/faq56-1.htm to http://www.history.navy.mil/faqs/faq56-1.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:46, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Fort Gadsden. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090502192646/http://tps.cr.nps.gov/nhl/detail.cfm?ResourceId=1214&ResourceType=Site to http://tps.cr.nps.gov/nhl/detail.cfm?ResourceId=1214&ResourceType=Site
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:03, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Fort Gadsden. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120520010346/http://www.southernhistory.us/majblue.htm to http://www.southernhistory.us/majblue.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040803134408/http://www.southernregion.fs.fed.us/florida/recreation/index_apa.shtml to http://www.southernregion.fs.fed.us/florida/recreation/index_apa.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:52, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I'm going to make the changes referred to above. Some of Fort Gadsden Historic Site will be moved to Battle of Negro Fort > Negro Fort. Give me a week, there's a bit to do. deisenbe (talk) 03:47, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Working on these articles 

message: The area of the fort was just described as both two and seven acres, and some speculation about time zones as a sign of remoteness was just restored. neither belong in the article. While it is possible to source remarks about 15 foot high parapets, there was no such thing in the strict sense. Loose or metaphorical usage should not be linked to a stricter definition. Qwirkle (talk) 13:56, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent reversion