lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Diana Thater

message: I do not understand your reasoning.  There are many articles on Wikipedia about important contemporary visual artists. When I search Wikipedia I find entries for Bill Viola, Stan Douglas, Jeff Koons, Mike Kelley these are all Diana Thater's contemporaries.  As it states in the first paragraph she has won a Guggenheim, been in three Whitney Bienneals, the Carnigie International and Many other museums. She is in the permenent collections of the Whitney Museum of American Art, The Tate in London and MOCA Los Angeles to name a few.  She is considered extremely noteworthy in the contmeporary art world.  I have linked her to many institutions that have their own Wikipedia pages. I really do not understand this judgement.  I would aslo like to mentiuon that when I search say Johnny Cash, Keith richars, Sean Connery, Tom Crusie and on and on and on they all have wikipedia pages are biased against the visual arts? Just because you my not personally be familiar with it doesn't make it unimporatant.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Eddiesmom (talk • contribs) <!Eddiesmom (talk) 01:53, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Rest assured you're not alone in your confusion. Similar observations have been made at: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diana Thater. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:04, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diana is notable 
Talk:Epithelioid Sarcoma

message: I am a Epithelioid Sarcoma Survivor (16 years) and I was at first told that my tumor was just a wart and that 'kids warts are never cancerous'
:I've made the attached page into what's called a "redirect" since we don't need two identical articles except for spelling; I've followed the usual spelling conventions for the title.  If someone types in either spelling, they'll get to the article.  Accounting4Taste:talk 17:46, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Karen Newman

message: I just removed a section about how she sounds nasally (with examples) when she sings the Star Spangled Banner. --Fahqall (talk) 00:18, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: Something's not right with the official website link on the bottom of the page.
Rungladwin (talk) 02:32, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official website link
Category talk:IBM PC and compatibles memory architecture

message: I'm redirecting this page to :Category:X86 memory management as that category is a superset. Also, I'm removing this as an entry within computer system categories, as this topic is a microprocessor-based feature/limitation. Those computer system level categories ought to use :Category: x86 architecture instead. Dyl (talk) 17:55, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Lou Ann Barton

message: For anyone who wishes to fill out the needed citations, etc., here's a possible start: https://www.austinchronicle.com/gyrobase/Archive/search?Search=lou+ann+barton     Acwilson9 (talk) 22:27, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations 

message: I know this can be a catch-all term, but in cleaning up this article, and the whole category on Women Record Producers, how is she a record producer?  Besides her own records, where I understand lines are blurred, but of course the artist has a say in how their album comes out.  Has she produced other people's records? Lyrelyrebird (talk) 12:56, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Record Producer
Talk:River Sheppey

message: Assessed as start and low importance for WP:WikiProject Rivers.  Needs a map and could benefit from expanding into structure as suggested at project page. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:03, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:N. C. Wyeth House and Studio

message: Some of the information listed here about the N. C. Wyeth House and studio is actually about the Andrew Wyeth studio. The Andrew Wyeth studio opened in 2012, not the N. C. Wyeth studio. Please contact us at the Brandywine Museum of Art for further information.  Museum@brandywine.org. 2601:41:C401:2920:5153:BF28:627C:EA61 (talk) 01:17, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for posting this on the talk page. Unfortunately, editors will probably not be contacting you at the address provided, as Wikipedia articles are supposed to reflect what has been published in reliable sources, not what companies have emailed to specific editors. If you would like the requested changes to be made, please supply sources to support your changes, and outline specifically what you would like changed. Z1720 (talk) 17:36, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request edit
Template talk:Chronology Topics

message: As of this writing, I'm just trying to get the ball rolling on connecting the disparate elements about Time and Chronology across Wikipedia.
My intention is to create another cross-referencing template for Time, which will cover units and methods of measurement, (like years, months, etc. and clocks, horology, etc.) but will also list the most general of Chronology topics, since Time supercedes Chronology in concept. 
This template, as it now stands, will need adjustment and editing as its development and range of coverage develops. -- Yamara 18:02, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Note on the creation of the Chronology Topics template
Talk:Trinchesia zelandica

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 . It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:58, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Dharma combat

message: There's a contradiction; the picture shows Linji (of Rinzai sect) but the text says Dharma combat is typical of Soto sect. This is probably not intended? I'm trying to find a reliable source to say it's more typical of Rinzai.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.54.172.124 (talk) 13:33, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Soto/Rinzai
Talk:Hossein Kalani

message: file::c:File:Persepolis Takht Jamshid Cup 1973.jpg Reason:Copyright issues, cropped from magazine and 50 years have not passed. subpage:link 
Message automatically deposited by a robot on 09:14, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  File nominated for deletion on commons
Talk:Seven Second Summits

message: Has anyone actually completed this list, or even seriously attempted it? I don't know of anyone who has stated this as a goal. If possible, the article should say one way or the other. -- Spireguy (talk) 18:09, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: He has since admitted that his claim of summitting K2 was false and he has yet to climb Mount Tyree. However, since someone is actually trying to accomplish this feat, I would say this supports, and I recommend, keeping the article. Racerx11 (talk) 03:57, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The thorough people at peaklist.org consider Puncak Mandala (aka Juliana Peak) to be 4760 m high, rather than the 4701 m given in our wikipedia article. This would make it loftier than Puncak Trikora (aka Mt Wilhelmina), in wikipedia listed as 7450 m. Peaklist's estimate is based on (enhanced) SRTM data, which (unenhanced) shows in for example google terrain view. Click your way to the closest terrain view of those two peaks (I've corrected the coordinates on both sites) and you'll see that the highest contours around the old queen's peak (Trikura) are only 4680 m and those around the younger queen's peak (Mandala) are 4720 m. Unless a peak is a spire, the contours tend to be on average 40 m below the summit. Trikura doesn't look very sharp, and it may be only around 4720 rather than the advertised 4750 m. Mandala is more isolated and harder to approach (it will take a few weeks) than Trikura, so this may not be welcome news for would be second summit ascenders. Check for example here for an account on how hard it is to get to Mandala; this site also lists reasonable heights of 4760 m for Mandala and 4730 for Trikura (the climber planned to climb both). Afasmit (talk) 00:47, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Peakbagger.com also lists it at 4760 m  so you may be on to something. I for one would support the change if you want to move that direction. I dont know if you want get more sources confirming it, maybe get another opinion or two from other editors, or just go ahead and be bold and make the change and see if it sails. Either or is fine with me.--Racerx11 (talk) 02:51, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I just ran across this  and this . This puts another wrinkle into things eh?--Racerx11 (talk) 04:18, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

text: Actually this may be nothing. This peak, Ngga Pulu, lies very close to Puncak Jaya, on the same ridge I think. Therfore it is likely it lacks significant prominence and may be just a subsidiary top. If so it can be ignored in a list such as this.--Racerx11 (talk) 04:44, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I've created a List of highest mountains of New Guinea. Outrageous amount of work, but perhaps with the help of Viewfinder and other experts it can become the standard list for Australasia / Oceania, as he and I seem to have done with the list of highest mountains. In that case the "seven second summits" people will eventually follow suit ;-) Afasmit (talk) 10:54, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Good work on the list! Very well done.--Racerx11 (talk) 01:42, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: List may be incorrect
Talk:N'Dambi

message: 'Biography'
I do not seem to get the format right for the biography data. They are systematically deleted. I cannot write as well as the editors at Concord, but I tried to keep it digestible and sourced.
I think the quality of the following sources is good (links are in the main wiki):
Dallas Observer. N'Dambi interview[ you must suppose Gilbert's read through it, before it was published]
and Yahoo music: well known source
confirm the data:
Name of Birth Chonita Gilbert
Date of Birth 1970
started singing with Badu in 1996
marriage from 88-90 or 91, one son
This is consistent with these sources, and it is the same everywhere you look, which includes interviews with ndambi herself.
The only source for a different date of birth is user BlueKeymgt. If you check the Dallas Texas State Records site (without paying, you can get a list of chonita gilberts, some with dob, you indeed find entries Chonita Gilbert from Dallas, age 40. If this is the same chonita as N'Dambi, the dob should become 1969. I cannot find any source to this, however, and this would be becoming own research anyway. I think it should be 1970 for the time being, as all the sources say so. Kohir-gabr (talk) 17:24, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The main part of the text is copied directly from
 www.concordmusicgroup.com/artists/Ndambi
There is a lot of name-dropping, and it is kinda essayist. Does not seem encyclopedic to meBluekeyagcy (talk) 13:27, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I did a large rewrite on the article. I added citations and addressed most of the concerns about it being too promotional. Marshall Stax (talk) 09:51, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyrights
Talk:Glenn Roberts (basketball)

message: This information is not yet completed with work still in progress. All information here can be confirmed with documentation. Until sources, links,etc. are posted, please direct any queations to Bill Lane, Sports Editor of the” Kingsport Times News.” E-mail him at blane@timesnews.ne
Moved by Toddst1 (talk) 18:11, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Moving talk from article
Talk:Nadia Oh

message: Hey, she has some new music she just tweeted. Here's the link
http://soundcloud.com/nadiaoh
Ec2031 (talk) 21:38, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: According to her Spotify bio/description she has allegedly retired from music, the bio was posted by her so I assume it's official, though she recently released a new song, do we have any info about this? 82.42.121.25 (talk) 21:06, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Retirement/New song
Talk:Smile (bank)

message: "Award-winning" ? Reference needed  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.98.254.212 (talk) 17:29, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: One of these? ? 80.192.35.108 (talk) 21:16, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Since there is an article on Wikipedia on the grin (go to Smile), surely this page needs a disambiguation notice. Vorbee (talk) 18:58, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Article on noverbal communication
Talk:Charles Neidich

message: This page could use a bunch of edits -- it still reads like a biography lifted off some promotional Web site. Philosophygeek (talk) 00:59, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Marko Topić

message: Stop changing his birthplace!  It is not Oštra Luka by Sanski Most, it is Oštra Luka near Orašje.  Which means that his birthplace is also not in the Republika Srpska.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.144.160.23 (talk) 07:21, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Computer-supported collaborative learning

message: I removed a paragraph from this article that appears to have been taken from How to evaluate NSCL processes? A new conceptual framework. This source is dated 2005, well before the article was started, so I assume it is the original. WeisheitSuchen (talk) 21:54, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright Violation

message: As part of a collaborative writing project in our computer-supported collaborative learning class at the University of Texas at Austin, my team and I rewrote this article. Of the 3 of us, 2 are seeking a doctorate in Instructional Technology and 1 is seeking a master's degree. Please take full advantage of the collaborative learning experience and make improvements to this article.Kootron (talk) 02:41, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Rewrite

message: The information about MOOC should be added to the article as it's an example of the computer-supported collaborative learning.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.87.122.54 (talk) 09:21, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: MOOC
Talk:Taja Sevelle

message: Editing by Sock Puppet and/or Taja Sevelle
The following statement appeared on the Taja Sevelle page for a lengthy period: 
"I am Taja Sevelle and the information below is verifiable by me. I have entered all of the information listed below. Any adjustments to this information are not authorized by me, Taja Sevelle."
Editing of a Wikipedia page by the subject of the page is prohibited. Further the claim of identity does not substantiate the identity of the claimant. Finally, Taja Sevelle - presuming that was indeed who made the edits - does not have the authority to 'authorize' edits to Wikipedia.
Unverifiable content submitted by this user has been removed. CouplandForever (talk) 23:43, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, no.  Editing of a Wikipedia page by the subject of the page is not prohibited.  However it is discouraged and if done, must be performed with caution.  You should review WP:COI.  Toddst1 (talk) 14:41, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I tried to edit the Taja Sevelle page, but my edits were deleted and I don't know why. I thought I sourced correctly... 
Any advice/tips would be greatly appreciated :)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by LackofPies (talk • contribs) 03:43, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need some help editing
Talk:The Woman in the Web

message: I think this article might be named wrong? IMDB and the original newspaper advertisement name this movie The Woman in the Web, not A Woman in the Web. Should we rename the article or is there a reason for the difference? Nesnad (talk) 15:52, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Good spot - I've been bold and moved it. Thanks. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 17:58, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Title
Talk:Bradley Aerobat

message: What's "VW power" ?  RJFJR (talk) 18:42, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It`s Volkswagen air-cooled engine. RobertoRMola (talk) 19:17, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: Moved from bottom of article to talk
There are no examples of this aircraft. "Bradley Aerospace" is a maildrop in Chico California.
There are no builders' groups for this aircraft.
:There are LOTS of examples of this aircraft (check google or http://www.bornrich.com/bradley-ba-100-aerobat.html, for instance). The link http://www.bradleyaerospace.org/ seems to be off, indeed. The groups are formed when 2 or more people decide to construct something. Since someone have a set of plans, sky (pun intended) is the limit. Kits, otherwise, are non-existent, anymore. RobertoRMola (talk) 19:25, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Snooky Lanson

message: Shouldn't there be some mention of how he picked up the "Snooky" nickname?  [signed] FLORIDA BRYAN  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:3:1000:5B1:9227:E4FF:FEF0:BBDE (talk) 06:27, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nickname derivation?
Talk:Dilbit

message: Good article. Written by an oil industry insider?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.231.86.128 (talk) 15:30, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

message: This article is structured in a way contrary to most wikipedia articles. The topics should not be questions, but rather adhere to normal wikipedia article structure naming conventions. 74.66.227.183 (talk) 03:51, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why questions for article structure? 
Talk:Live in Barcelona (Elton John video)

message: This DVD is great, but it doesn't contain one song - "I Don't Wanna Go On With You Like That". It was performed by Sir Elton at this concert. Does anybody know maybe there was some re-edition of this DVD?
77.123.115.72 (talk) 18:36, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This is an uncontroversial move: 'Elton John' isn't a part of the album title and needs to be moved to the correct title. However, the move cannot be done without administrator help, as the edit history of Live in Barcelona (Elton John DVD) is too long, so I cannot move this article myself. Xnux the Echidna 02:37, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Parsecboy (talk) 13:53, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:Belizean Writers and Poets Society

message: The principle of notability is that a subject has received "significant" coverage. That is not evidenced with one source. Otr500 (talk) 01:00, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sourcing
Talk:Perfect Gentlemen

message: Are people sure that the group's album The Perfect Gentlemen, came out in 1993? Amazon and Billboard both have the album marked as 1989
:Fixed Chubbles (talk) 18:49, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: If someone with the knowledge could make a disambig page, that would be great. When I typed in Perfect Gentleman, I was taken directly to the page of the Wyclef Jean song. Since there are trwo different topics with the same name, a disambig page would be useful. 
Also, it might be useful to have a link between Maurice Starrr (Sr.)'s page and this one.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.19.21.38 (talk) 01:13, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect
Talk:Judgment (mathematical logic)

message: The current article contains this text:
:For example, if p = "x is even", the implication
:: (\vdash p)\rightarrow(x \pmod 2 \equiv 0)''
which is clear-as-mud and/or wrong. I suspect the parenthesis is mis-placed. I suspect it should be
: \vdash (p\rightarrow(x \pmod 2 \equiv 0))
If I try to read the former, with the bad paren placement, I start with (\vdash p) which can be readily recognized as a tautology: from nothing at all, from thin air, I can prove that p is true. Since its a tautology, p is always true. So this reduces to true \rightarrow(x \pmod 2 \equiv 0), which is blatently wrong, unless x is restricted to be a member of the set of even natural numbers.  For example, x must not belong to the set of quadruped furry animals, because x \pmod 2 is not even well-defined for furry animals.
The second form with re-arranged parenthesis, makes slightly more sense, but is still ill-defined.  There, the reading starts with p\rightarrow(x \pmod 2 \equiv 0), so that p is now some proposition, might be true, might be false, who knows, but whenever p is true, then if follows that x \pmod 2 \equiv 0.  Presumably, it works out that whenever p is true, then x is even.
Oh, hang on. It also says: For example, if p = "x is even",... and so perhaps this is meant to be the definition of what p is? In that case, simple substitution works.  That is, perform the substitution p/ (x\!\!\!\! \pmod 2 \equiv 0) aka [p := (x\!\!\!\! \pmod 2 \equiv 0)]. The first formula gives
: (\vdash (x \pmod 2 \equiv 0))\rightarrow(x \pmod 2 \equiv 0)
which is insane because  (\vdash (x \pmod 2 \equiv 0)) is not a tautology.  The second form gives
: \vdash ((x \pmod 2 \equiv 0) \rightarrow(x \pmod 2 \equiv 0))
which obviously is a tautology, and totally acceptable.  So I'm editing the article to correct what seems to be an obvious error.   67.198.37.16 (talk) 15:48, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: No, I'm just gonna bulk remove that. This content appeared due to a merge that should not have been performed in the first place. Its crazy gobbly-gook; it was incoherent from the get-go. 67.198.37.16 (talk) 22:17, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  How should this be understood?
Talk:Fountain Lake Farm

message: Photos and/or photo uploads are needed.
*HABS photos do not seem to be available for this site.
*Some of NRHP photos linked in article are taken by NPS employee, hence should be public domain and can be used.
*New photos would be helpful.
:Photo had been uploaded when you made this request. It had been placed in John Muir's article. There's a "NO TRESPASSING" sign at the entrance to the farm. I did not trespass. I did take a picture of the entrance, which I added to the article. Royalbroil 05:39, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Images of the natural features in the landmarked area that are in the public park would also be nice. Magic♪piano 16:24, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Photos
Talk:Union jack

message: The 'J' of Jack should be upper-case.
At the moment this page re-directs to Union Flag, and re-directed from Union jack appears at the top of the page for what I would guess is most users. This page used to be titled Union Jack.
It is important to correct this as the term appearing in lower-case does not refer to the Union Jack in the context of the British flag, or royal banner of the Commonwealth. Correct-o-pedia (talk) 18:48, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:John Frost (SAAF officer)

message: Normally I don't like using website sources. Any book sources would be greatly appreciated, I do not have any detailed literature on this pilot Dapi89 (talk) 18:50, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: I was thing of putting this up for Did You Know, possibly along the lines of "Major Jack Frost, the highest scoring ace of the SAAF disappeared in 1942 and his plane and body have never been found". Any comments? Grant | Talk 02:55, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did You Know