lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:De Graafschap

message: 82.176.144.83 & 217.102.250.129 made nonsense/vandalism edits to the article. Both have been deleted One added the name of "Dirk Roodzant" who does have social media pages, to the article. If Dirk reads this by chance, he'll be interested.  Tapered (talk) 22:34, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism
Talk:MVV Maastricht

message: The redirect MVV has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Mirrortemplar (talk) 18:26, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:MVV]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:FC Volendam

message: The redirect 2023–24 FC Volendam season has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Steel1943 (talk) 14:51, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:2023–24 FC Volendam season]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Deportivo Alavés

message: Huh? The first paragraph says _Founded on 26 March 2004 as Sport Friends Club_ but the details frame on the side (and other references) show that the club was founded in January 1921. What's the issue here? Or were they re-founded after bankruptcy  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.9.101.234 (talk) 02:27, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Founding date
Talk:RC Celta de Vigo/Archive 1

message: I just corrected some minor grammatical errors on the page. Slaveofgod 23:17, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prepositions/articles 

message: I have removed the list of recent transfers, as Wikipedia is not a news service. Oldelpaso 11:40, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Transfers
Talk:RCD Mallorca

message: Michael Laudrup isn't a former coach and it's now known when he'll stop. His contract runs to 2012 by the way.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.82.249.149 (talk) 20:51, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Former coaches 

message: The redirect 2023–24 RCD Mallorca season has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Steel1943 (talk) 19:05, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:2023–24 RCD Mallorca season]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:CA Osasuna

message: Brilliant! Opening paragraph states the club was founded in 1920.
Then the History section opens up with the 2005/2006 season, genius!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Johntinsley (talk • contribs) 14:33, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: History

message: Why not add the Basque pronunciation too? Osasuna is literally a Basque word. The stress goes like Osásunà in Basque. 79.116.130.131 (talk) 06:30, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:   Basque pronunciation  

message: The redirect 2023–24 CA Osasuna season has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Steel1943 (talk) 19:11, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:2023–24 CA Osasuna season]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Sweet'n Low

message: Is there a downside to using Sweet'N Low? Are there any health problems caused (directly or indirectly) by (overuse?) Sweet'N Low ?
:The concern would be with Saccharin itself, and that page has pretty good coverage on said health concerns. Since this page links to Saccharin, there's probably no need to duplicate that information here. Dfrauzel 23:42, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I just wanted to add that this is not a forum for general discussion and that I, like most people on Wikipedia, don't have a local Vons or Kroger supermarket anyways. Eebster the Great (talk) 01:12, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Health concerns 

message: Sweet'N Low (why capitalized 'N instead of 'n'?) should be a Genericized trademark like Kleenex.  (In my professional opinion.)
I thought it was
:I don't think so.  I'd have to see some evidence it's typically used to mean "artificial sweetener."  In my experience, Splenda is the more common synecdoche.  Twin Bird (talk) 03:37, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Trademark WARS

message: not N--Mattprokopiloveyou (talk) 22:15, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  n' 

message: Okay, so you're not supposed to eat the delicious looking silica gel packets that come with your shoes, but Sweet'n Low has silica gel in it. What gives?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.104.57.14 (talk) 18:00, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Silica Gel 

message: Since the name is trademarked as "Sweet'N Low," why don't we have it as such?  I can't think of a reason not to move this, but I'll leave this up a bit.
There's a slightly bizarre section above (#3) that appears to have been the reason for moving it in the first place, but there doesn't seem to be any reason other than "it shouldn't be that way."  Twin Bird (talk) 03:39, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposing a move. 

message: It beggars belief that the name comes from an 1863 song rather than the song "Lida Rose" from The Music Man, a huge Broadway hit from the very same year that Sweet 'N Low was introduced (1957). See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wtn7KER4YgA#t=2m22s  Mark Taylor (talk) 02:33, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brand name derivation 

message: Why is there no reference as to the fact that its bitter taste way overpowers what little sweetness it actually has? The fact that it's colloquially known as Bitter'n Low? How aspartame was only invented because the only artificial "sweetener" in existence at the time was actually bitter? I mean, this thing reads like an advertisement for failing to mention its bitter taste.68.42.32.128 (talk) 04:25, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bitter'n Low 

message: My box of Sweet n Low…had 250 packets that were almost solid product per package…not granulated…box completely dry and no sign of water damage… 136.34.30.77 (talk) 01:05, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Complaints
Talk:Hurricane Dot (1959)

message: It's important that monetary figures include modern-day units accompanying them, as in "$6 million ($38 million in 2005 USD)".  This is pretty much equivalent to including mph and km/h units side-by-side.  However in some places (like in the last paragraph of the impact) that include lots of damage figures, this can get a bit tediously long.  Is there something we can do about it (in general, not specifically in this article)? — jdorje (talk) 02:32, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Money units 

message: I have upped the importance of this storm to mid-importance, per the CPHC summaries, which lists Dot as a "notable Hawaiian hurricane". – Chacor 07:28, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Have upped it to B-class as well, based on Coredesat's comments at the WPTC assessment page. – Chacor 05:34, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Importance

message: I am failing this because, while it's certainly a nice article, it just strikes me as being less comprehensive than it could be. It's a good start. But Good Articles need to be more than a good start.
I do understand that data here is kind of thin as we're talking a hurricane which didn't quite hit Hawaii almost a half-century ago. But more research could be done. There's got to be newspaper archives somewhere, the Honolulu Advertiser maybe, which could be looked up and cited to give a better idea of how Hawaii reacted to the storm and its aftermath. I strongly suggest you get this involved with WikiProject Hawaii. We need better history.
Also, the infobox picture needs to have the sea lightened. Frankly, with that blue as dark as it is I was about to wipe the dust over the storm track off my monitor when I realized it was Hawaii.
Good luck and, as usual, no prejudice against renomination. Daniel Case 01:23, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Failure
Talk:G0 phase

message: why isnt this part of cell cycle article? Nominaladversary 01:55, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: To get out of G0, required is a hormone? 129.180.166.53 (talk) 12:50, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  To get out of G0 
Talk:New England Interstate Route 9

message: An Interstate highway is a highway built to a specific design standard, including limited access (cloverleaf or the like exits an entrances), and designed for high speed and high volume use, like I 93 in MA and NH, or I 95.  Rt 9 is properly just a highway, not an Interstate Highway, having an article identify it as Interstate is misleading.  SailorfromNH 01:56, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not the modern Interstate highway system, but the 1920s New England Interstate Routes. Polaron 17:20, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Interstate highway?

message: On a 1925 Rand McNally auto trail atlas, the section of Route 9 between Brattleboro and Bennington has a special designation as the Green Mountain Pass auto trail. The symbol given is the black and yellow New England Route 9 pole marker shown in the article. The road is also labeled ⑨ for New England Route 9. - Parsa (talk) 00:25, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Green Mountain Pass
Talk:Grasshopper Club Zürich

message: As this is a multisport club, I've grouped the current information under a Football header, and left an empty section (with an "expand" tag) for "Other Sports". LukeSurl t c 20:34, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: You are right, they do have other sections with all sorts of sports. However, they are first and foremost associated with football. Thus, I think it is better to follow the German version of the article and have the main article about the football team with a section "Other sports" somewhere at the end. Wild8oar (talk) 11:24, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other sports 

message: "In 1893, Grasshopper became the first Swiss team to play in (what was then) Germany, defeating RC Strasbourg 1–0." False. RCS was founded in 1906 and the first international match played by AS Strasbourg (only active football team in Strasbourg in 1893) was versus FC Basel (june 18th, 1894). (100 ans de football en Alsace, volume 1890-1920, p.21). 85.69.175.172 (talk) 17:29, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  1893?
Talk:FC St. Gallen

message: Check the German article for the up to date one.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.5.229.20 (talk) 07:29, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong logo

message: St Gallen is the oldest existing football club in continental Europe, only if continental Europe excludes Copenhagen (which is on a island in Denmark). Kjøbenhavns Boldklub added football to their program on 24th October 1878, five months before St Gallen was founded. KB still have amateur teams and they form part of the professional club FC Copenhagen--Eujin16 (talk) 19:48, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Oldest existing football club in continental Europe
Talk:Neuchâtel Xamax FCS

message: According to fr-wiki, :fr:Neuchâtel Xamax FCS and :fr:Neuchâtel Xamax seems two clubs, probably phoenix club. Matthew hk (talk) 12:13, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neuchâtel Xamax FCS
Talk:White admiral

message: There is also another butterfly know as "white admiral" : limenitis arthemis (also sometimes basilarchia arthemis). The specie is present in North-America. It is also the official insect emblem of Québec, the sub-specie limenitis arthemis arthemis that is. This white admiral was discovered by Drury. Someone with a little more time should include this in the article. Although the two are in the same family they differ in appearance. Pro bug catcher 01:59, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: You can now add the other names and subspecies to the Red-spotted Purple article. Shyamal 03:17, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation link at the top of article
Talk:FC Zürich

message: Just a question about Vasquez. By international football terms, is he a Swedish or Peruvian player? I know was born in Lima and grew up in Sweden. Since he has played sevral under 21 games for the Swedish national team, should he not be "Swedish"? (I am not trying to take anything away from his Peruvian identity)?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.203.182.109 (talk) 16:04, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Andrés Vasquez

message: My opinion about the bias of this section corresponds with that of Fischbach.
I think it was wrong however, to delete it in its entirety. This section is part of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Clubs. It therefore has a clear right to exist. Wwicki 09:39, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Supporters section

message: Almost all articles on football clubs have links to fanclubs. To include them is part of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Clubs guidelines. I would recommend to everyone who disagrees to their inclusion, to do the following: Request a change here at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football/Clubs. For now, they can be included.Wwicki 12:14, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Fanclubs section

message: IMO this article should be moved to FC Zürich. -- Firefox13 21:01, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move article 

message: This section has been repeatedly added back in contravention of WP:V. Is anyone able to provide a precise source for these stats and include it in the article? I have tagged this as unreferenced. I propose to remove the stats finally if they are not sourced within the next two weeks. Fenix down (talk) 12:01, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Fenix down, are you fine with this suggestion? If yes, I may unprotect the article. --Leyo 11:30, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems fine to me. I have no problem with those sources being used and the page unprotected. Sorry for not speaking to you first Fischbach, I should have done before removing but got carried away what with unreferenced stats and seemingly random lists of notable players being a major problem across a lot of football club articles. Fenix down (talk) 20:36, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Player Records
Talk:Yverdon-Sport FC

message: I know the 2015 is a bold move which was reverted in 2019. However, it seem both version are plausible. In the official website, Yverdon-Sport, Yverdon Sport, Yverdon Sport SA (the legal name) are appeared. Even worse UEFA.com put FC on the front, while old news report on the same site put on the back with hyphen. Matthew hk (talk) 15:13, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:Chinese Immigration Act, 1923

message: "In November 2006, an Agreement-in-Principle to Highlight Chinese Canadians' Contribution to Building Canada was announced. Former Prime Minister Paul Martin also gave a personal apology for this Act."
When did this even happen actually? Last year? --User:Fitzwilliam 04:30, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Harper gave a speech apologizing for the Act yesterday, perhaps it was contained in the speech? Kilter 17:09, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Typo?

message: This article needs to be renamed to exclude the word "The". Deet 02:04, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename

message: Propose merging the article noted in the subtitle with this one, for these reasons:
# Skookum's comments in Talk:Anti-Chinese legislation in Canada are valid in my opinion.
# It's not like there is a lot of different types of legislation listed in the Anti article. It is limited to the immigration legislation, which is discussed in more detail (including the controversy) here.
Deet 14:46, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Makes sense to me. So, how do we now go about doing that?  Do we just cut and paste the info and then turn the old page into a redirect? Deet 23:48, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Exactly, but personally, I would change the merge tags and wait a week first. --Usgnus 23:57, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Anti-Chinese legislation in Canada]]

message: What are these? Could someone clarify and add to the article? 199.185.84.10 16:02, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Special Circumstances?
Talk:Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999

message: I have an alternate wording of section "2.3.3.2. Methods involving release into waterways after processing or treating meltwater". I think the act has been edited.
Waybackmachine (http://web.archive.org/) might have a copy dated Aug 13, 2007, but I do not have access.
The text removed is "Snow scraped from the road surfaces is filled with many different kinds of contaminants: oily residue from cars, trash and corrosive road salt. This makes it too hazardous from an environmental perspective to introduce into the water table."
Does anyone have a hard copy, a printing from the date of release to the public? If so, can you confirm or deny the editing. Thank you.--Mark v1.0 (talk) 17:59, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Editing of the C.E.P.A.
Talk:Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act

message: Hi,
The first line "...group of data protection directives that limit trade with nations not providing privacy protection equivalent to the EU directives.." is not accurate.  While PIPEDA was passed partially in response to EU legislation, that is/was not the primary motivation of the legislation.
From the Industry Canada website:
"The Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) is a new law that protects personal information in the hands of private sector organizations and provides guidelines for the collection, use and disclosure of that information in the course of commercial activity."
Source: http://privacyforbusiness.ic.gc.ca/epic/internet/inpfb-cee.nsf/en/hc00005e.html
I will try and re-write the first paragraph to reflect this.
--Davidley 20:46, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 2006 comment

message: Hello, 
I've added a couple sentences to the first paragraph highlighting the mandatory 5 year Parliamentary review required by PIPEDA.  I think this is a good thing to note, given that this mandatory review was an important point of discussion when PIPEDA was enacted.  The first review has already taken place and a second review is likely to take place in the next year or so.  
Asafari (talk) 21:13, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment by [[User:Asafari|Asafari]]  

message: The phrase "(typically pronounced 'pee-hip-ah')" appears in this article and the main article on PHIPA. Is this type of colloquial chit-chat really necessary. This is not an acronym that can be pronounced as a word. It's an initialism that is not spoken. Ok, sure, within the department originating this act, they might pronounce it pee-hip-ah, but to an outsider, there is no pronunciation.
I would remove it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.169.79.99 (talk) 02:49, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  (typically pronounced 'pee-hip-ah') - is this really necessary?
Talk:Glory (singer)

message: This article is far from neutral. It probably was lifted from a fan-page or something. Someone should work with it. Thief12 02:04, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think I already fixed most of it. Thief12 15:37, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Emergencies Act

message: "Furthermore financial institutions must on a continuing basis to determine whether any persons..."
This sentence feels weird. I feel like there should be a verb after "must" but I'm not sure what.Earl wilmore (talk) 15:14, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing verb? 

message: This section seems to be getting a little long.  Perhaps it would be best to spin it off into an separate article (or at least the parts about the reviews into the use of the Emergencies Act in 2022). There are essentially three ongoing reviews: the court challenge(s), the government inquiry, and the Parliamentary committee. I am not sure it will be appropriate for us to continue to expand details about these processes, and the response to them here. It will take over the article. It also seems too much to be dealt with at Canada convoy protest. Anyone have any thoughts on this?--Darryl Kerrigan (talk) 23:20, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section on use during the Trucker Protests, investigations 

message: Concerning the recent edits about the freezing of bank accounts and collecting of financial information from banks.  It seems that the court found both breached section 8, see the court's summary which states The Economic Order infringed s. 8 of the Charter by permitting unreasonable search and seizure of the financial information of designated persons and the freezing of their bank and credit card accounts. There is also note of this in the judgment though it seems more ambiguous (but see paragraphs 349-358). Also these paragraphs note that these breaches concerning the freezing of the accounts did not apply only to two defendants, but also to a spouse who held a joint account.  The collection of financial information applied to many others. Anyway, hope this provides some clarity. Some of the documents are certainly a bit confusing.-- Darryl Kerrigan (talk) 18:49, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section 8 breaches
Talk:Mircalla

message: What can this article provide that shouldn't be in Carmilla? Maestlin 02:07, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Even though it purports to be about the character, all it does is summarize the short story (poorly) and list adaptations. The same information is already in the article about the story, which is much better written and more complete. Is there anything of interest to add about Mircalla that is not in the Carmilla article and has no place there? Maestlin 17:27, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I can't see anything in this article that isn't already in Carmilla (with the possible exception of a "Carmilla films" entry or two). IMO, it can just be redirected immediately. - Motor (talk) 19:19, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Franklin Gothic

message: The original text for this article was taken from the copyrighted page here. Please do not restore it. —Chowbok 02:12, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyrighted page!

message: What shill wrote this thing? Dutchman Schultz (talk) 03:07, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: One Huge Ad for ITC?

message: Is this font realist or grotesque? The article is misleading... Al.ochoa (talk) 13:02, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which subtype? 
Talk:Holmdel High School

message: Reverted the information about Mr. Wisinski as it is true.
Johnkoryat 16:43, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy 
Talk:Phase IV (1974 film)

message: The text for the plot says:
Instead, Hubbs literally falls into a trap – a deep pit that the ants fill with earth.
I think they fill it with ants. We have been shown earlier that the ants are very efficient at decomposing animals. In a foreshadowing scene, using an actual recording that shows ants doing scavening that has been (obviously) greatly sped up for the film, a desert mouse that ventured near the lab is killed and completely disassembled in mere seconds by ant hordes. In the intro explainer, a large spider (tarantula) meets the same fate.
2001:7E8:C0C5:600:7FF4:EB1E:DCC0:C4D0 (talk)  — Preceding undated comment added 09:24, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Probably plot recounting error 

message: Remember when friends became "all about work"... and how porn is real regular in some ways... Solomon's advice in Proverbs "go to the ant... consider her ways and be wise"... anyway... workers and drones don't mind having a queen... she doesn't steal all the attention, just needs a little honeycomb sometimes... but one more reason I always look for a version of the Bible that includes the rich man's name being Dives, which means "fat" and "rich".  I guess Newly Worldly Orderlies don't want that being known or noticed.  Interesting movie. 2600:6C56:69F0:B400:2CEA:E29F:4014:CDE1 (talk) 01:43, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The rich man Dives mentioned in Luke 16:19. 2600:6C56:69F0:B400:2CEA:E29F:4014:CDE1 (talk) 01:44, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ants as symbols