lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Legal release

message: This section with the text:
:It is common for contributors to "double sign" release forms. This is a standard, necessary and highly recommended procedure.
Had been annotated by an IP user with: 
:NPOV: In the history of this page, the comment about "double sign" appears to have been added by an angry individual referring to a specific incident he experienced, and has since been edited down to something that looks more neutral but really is meaningless since the term "double sign" is not defined here or in any legal dictionary, and since "common" is inconsistent with "necessary".
Given that, I've moved it here.  If someone can find a source for "Double signing" we can add it back in.  A brief google search didn't bring up anything for me that wasn't attributable back to Wikipedia.  -- Siobhan Hansa 16:51, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Double signing 

message: The third sentence of [the lede of] this article -- at least, in this version of the article -- is about 112 words long (including two parenthetical phrases). I might be off by a little bit, but even if I counted wrongly, I am pretty sure that it [the number of words] is somewhere up there in the "triple digits". 
=== Possible breakup? === 
That sentence might be a good candidate for being broken up into two or more sentences. 
=== "release" probably should be "releasee" -- right? === 
Part of that Herculean sentence says:[...]  the release wishes to use the images, sounds or [...]
IMHO, the word "release" there, probably should be "releasee". (right?)  
Note that the word "releasee" is used correctly in the first sentence [in the lede] of this article. (along with the word "releasor"!) 
Any comments? --Mike Schwartz (talk) 00:44, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Run-on sentence (also: "release" vs. "releasee" )  

message: Part of that Herculean sentence says:[...]  the release wishes to use the images, sounds or [...]
IMHO, the word "release" there, probably should be "releasee". (right?)  
Note that the word "releasee" is used correctly in the first sentence [in the lede] of this article. (along with the word "releasor"!) 
Any comments? --Mike Schwartz (talk) 00:44, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "release" probably should be "releasee" -- right? 

message: A merge was proposed years ago, but I see no discussion. Seems like a good idea;  After a merge, model release should redirect to a section of this page  legal release#Model release.--Elvey(t•c) 06:15, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge?
Talk:Lophotrochozoa

message: After 10 years it's still a hypothesized taxon. Dysmorodrepanis (talk) 05:12, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs rewrite

message: @User:‎Chiswick Chap
Dicyemida are probably a sister group of Gastrotricha, so they are part of Rouphozoa, not Lophotrochozoa sensu stricto, see The phylogenetic position of dicyemid mesozoans offers insights into spiralian evolution (2017). Note: Lophotrochozoa sensu lato (as in Phylonyms. A Companion to the PhyloCode, 2020, ISBN 978-1-138-33293-5), containing also Gnathifera and Rouphozoa, are named by the synonym Spiralia in enwiki.
--Petr Karel (talk) 08:35, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Which is what you should have explained and cited in the article, with page number. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:42, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dicyemida
Talk:Madewood Plantation House

message: Photos and/or photo uploads are needed.
*HABS photos may be available for this site.
*NRHP photos linked in article are not taken by NPS employee, but are stamped NRHP property. Hence public domain status is unclear.
*New photos would be helpful.
I have added a couple photos from my own personal stash. However, I am a novice and not good at formatting. I would appreciate if someone could help me out and get the photos to look a little better on this page!
Elambeth (talk) 15:25, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Photos
Talk:Iru (food)

message: This is the same food as sumbala, it even says on the sumbala page that the Yoruba word for sumbala is Iru.  I think the two articles should be merged.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ElVacilando (talk • contribs) 04:41, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.--A12n (talk) 01:17, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

text: Agreed. RikSchuiling (talk) 09:40, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

message: Is Iru (Yoruba) which is used in cooking and made from fermented African locust beans (Parkia biglobosa) the same as African Griffonia ?Ashade1 (talk) 10:44, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: No.--A12n (talk) 01:17, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  African Locust Beans and African Griffonia 

message: The redirect Iru (food has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Utopes (talk / cont) 20:51, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Iru (food]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Nora S. Unwin

message: The University of Oregon gives permission to use the material at the NWDA site for this article.  Email has been sent to permissions-en. Mdazey 17:09, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Permission

message: It is not clear that Elizabeth Yates is either of the persons to which the link leads. Orphan status could be improved if the actual author page is definitely known. The link should be to an author, not a disambig page. --DThomsen8 (talk) 22:04, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Elizabeth Yates, children's book author
Talk:Leland College

message: A previous version of Leland College article was identified as a copyright violation copied from
here.  Actually, that shows some rearrangement of its sentences.  To me it seems the previous version of Leland College article was copied from here instead, which has the sentences in the same order and has some other text that appears to have been copied.  Anyhow, let's start over.  Into a new temporary article, I put the NRHP infobox and a link to the second source. doncram (talk) 02:59, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Copyvio version deleted and replaced with the reworked article, good job :) Jeepday (talk) 01:41, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: New version of Leland College article
Talk:E. M. Delafield

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 17:15, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: Some well-meaning editor is worried that this article draws heavily on www.starcourse.org/EMD so might be a copyright problem. Don't worry - I am the author of that website. NBeale (talk) 16:20, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The page has been blanked again pending verification by the processes set out for these circumstances. These were already linked on your talk page. Once the release is displayed, the text can be restored. Please do not restore it prior to verifying licensing. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:21, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright Concerns

message: I am so impressed with this entry, it is very well-written, I like it very much, particularily the descriptions of her books.  I am reading "Consequences" now and will be able to add a synopsis for the book.   Rissa, copy editor (talk) 05:04, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consequences 

message: Is the character "Rose" from the Diaries based on Margaret Mackworth, 2nd Viscountess Rhondda?  Thank you. Rissa, copy editor (talk) 05:10, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Rose" from the Diaries
Talk:Old Louisiana State Capitol

message: http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_ewpEPV7ANWI/SWw4z2v_mkI/AAAAAAAAJ2c/tovg3vRPdWQ/s1600-h/ocap2.jpg  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.185.101.135 (talk) 16:48, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Lovely spiral stair 

message: I have added a photo of the Old State Capitol, which I took 4 September, while in Baton Rouge visiting some family.  The photo certainly isn't the best photo, but one I hope will suffice for the time being, until a better one is obtained. Avazina 03:45, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo Added
Talk:SOCOM U.S. Navy SEALs: Tactical Strike

message: Remade the page. You could have just reverted the copyrighted material.  But it is a Legit game --Cs california 09:10, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: RE: Copy Vio

message: You guys need to put the box art on the page because we all know that's not what it looks like. I would but I don't know how.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.163.161.227 (talk) 04:49, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New cover 

message: Seriously. Thats unreadable.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.198.204.144 (talk) 11:40, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wall of text storyline. 

message: Can somebody PLEASE put a watch on this? First the weapons list dissapeared (yet it's perfectly fine for fireteam bravo 3) and then somebody deletes any mention of the games better ratings in exchange for poorer ratings from reviewers I've never heard of.
I've a suspicion that a certain kind of person who likes FPSs too much is vandalising it because they didn't take the time to learn the greatness of this game as a strategy game.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.97.233.99 (talk) 23:21, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Firstly, a list of weapons shouldn't be in a Wikipedia article, as per  Wikipedia:NOTGUIDE. If there was a notable weapon that large parts of the gameplay hinged upon, such as Half-Life 2's Gravity Gun, that would deserve mention. Real-world weapons, with no unusual functionality or signifigance, don't derserve to be listed here.More importantly, since "Metacritic" has Tactical Strike averaging at 72%, I feel the current selection of reviews adequately reflects this score. Michael Baptista (talk) 23:08, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Content
Talk:Holy Sepulchre Cemetery (Cheltenham Township, Pennsylvania)

message: I'm on a fixed income and I burried my father2years ago.I don't have a lot of money to buy a new head stones
Someone told me to ask if you have any head stones, I'm looking for a flat one.maybe a chip on the corner that won't be noticed when placed or maybe one that has the name Robert and no one picked it up or a sample.I have300dollars.please let me know if you can help me.Ty  Kathleen Graham (talk) 15:59, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cheap or discount head stones
Talk:Radio Wimbledon

message: The radio rights have been given to IMG starting with the 2012 Championships, and it willbe included with video rights as part of something called "Live@Wimbledon". The type of coverage will be similar, but it will be a different program, with mostly different presenters/commentators. Here's the information for it: http://www.wimbledon.com/news/press-release/2011-Live-at-Wimbledon
And details: http://www.wimbledon.com/content/documents/about/Live@Wimbledon-breakdown.pdf
--Kcpajor (talk) 19:38, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Radio Wimbledon is no more

message: It would be good to get some more info on the individual presenters if anyone has any.82.44.101.55 17:21, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good page but... 
Talk:GvSIG

message: Im rewriting the article to make it readable.
Please revise as nessisary.
--Leif.t 17:22, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revision 
Talk:Love Is Strong

message: The B-sides on this single are not from the album Voodoo Lounge, and given that the infobox notes that the single is from Voodoo Lounge, inferring that the B-sides are from the album is understandable. I believe the non-album status should be noted, specifically in the infobox, and some don't. Let's try and reach a consensus. (SweetTaylorJames (talk) 03:28, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Notation of non-album B-sides
Talk:Connected (RBD song)

message: I have removed the Notability warning from the article.  I was the one who originally attached it.  According to the notability guidelines, an album is notable if the group is notable, and I believe the group matches that definition.  I am vaugly concerned with the possibility of conflicts of interest and the possibility of WP:OR, but at this point I cannot justify the notability warning on this article. --Mdwyer 17:27, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, the rule says an album is notable if the group is too. But it doesn't mean someone should make an article for every song featured on that album. And this song is like any other song on the album. It is just a rumor if this song is going to be released, as many speculations go round the fact the new collaboration with the Black Eyed Peas will be the new single. I think the notability tag should remain there. Luigi-ish 21:00, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah.  Yes, you're probably right.  However, perhaps a merge would be more in line?  Or even an AfD?  I'd support either. --Mdwyer 05:29, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Doncaster PSB

message: "...principally covering the line from London to Edinburgh..." I think this statement implies that the signalbox controls the whole route from London to Edinburgh, but the article then goes on to mention other signal boxes at Kings Cross and Peterborough.  Would it be useful to indicate how much of the route is controlled from Doncaster? 195.92.101.11 17:29, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Lurs, Alpes-de-Haute-Provence

message: details for new article taken mostly from the French wiki --NSH001 17:34, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Production part approval process

message: ==Penalties==
What penalties could be imposed to vendors for not doing a PPAP on a part for changing to a regrind or outsourcing component parts?Tj63069 17:41, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Questions

message: What penalties could be imposed to vendors for not doing a PPAP on a part for changing to a regrind or outsourcing component parts?Tj63069 17:41, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Penalties

message: Hello, the text says Version 4 March 1st 2006 but not of which standard! Can somebody clarify this? --Master on EN (talk) 08:36, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Version 4 March 1st 2006

message: How can PPAPU stand for "production part approval process"? What does U stand for? Aidanr444 (talk) 08:44, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Production part approval process (PPAPU)
Talk:List of Mirmo! characters

message: The English cast for this show cannot be right.  It incorporates actors from far too many different localities.  It looks more like a fan's wish list than the actual cast list.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.28.11.128 (talk) 01:52, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  English Cast 
Talk:Neomura

message: Why is there a wikispecies link?  They're still mucking about in 4-eukaryote-kingdom-land.  There is no Neomura article in wikispecies.  Werothegreat 01:53, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They have both Cetartiodactyla and Artiodactyla articles. They don't explain that only let write articles from one source. If a taxon exists it must have an article for explaining what it is. 83.45.216.23 17:45, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What?  Artiodactyls are mammals.  We're talking about the supergroup that contains Archaea and Eukarya.  There is no page on wikispecies for it, so there is no need for a wikispecies link at this time.  Werothegreat 01:49, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see the difference between having two incompatible proposed clades at ordo level and at superdomain level. 80.30.232.210 18:10, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It isn't incompatible.  There just ISN'T A PAGE FOR IT ON WIKISPECIES YET.  So there is no point to have a wikispecies link to a page that does not exist.  Werothegreat 17:46, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikispecies link? 

message: Is there any specific reason that an image of a leech is what represents this clade? It seems rather silly to simply place a picture of any arbitrary organism simply for illustrative purposes. Tan  |  39 02:13, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I myself was wondering why, of all possible members of Archea and Eukarya to carry the torch, the honor falls to the almighty leech.  The choice really sucks. - 96.255.251.122 (talk) 02:32, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Image concern

message: Hi. I think this article should explicitly specify whether the Neomura taxon is simply an artificial\conventional taxon, or, contrarily, it is based on a natural (real) taxon as well. --Faus (talk) 13:27, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Question about Neomura as a Taxon Superdomain

message: An article published online January 2, 2020 is a recent defense and extensive elaboration of the neomura hypothesis. 
* 
HTH. DCDuring (talk) 16:44, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: "DOI not found" (a search for the title finds a copy on ResearchGate, which I grabbed rather the seeing whether the publisher's copy was paywalled or not). Lavateraguy (talk) 15:13, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: T C-S's 2020 defence and elaboration of neomura hypothesis

message: There's yet another variant of the hypothesis I can think of: that the eukaryotes emerged from within the archaeans (which seems to be the consensus now), and that the archaeans in turn emerged from within the bacteria, making the traditional taxa Archaea and Bacteria both paraphyletic. Neomura would simply be a synonym of Archaea (including the eukaryotes) in this view. (Admittedly, I really like this idea aesthetically.) Is this possibility still a viable hypothesis? --Florian Blaschke (talk) 00:00, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  One-domain hypothesis
Talk:Parlange Plantation House

message: There is a serious problem with the dating of this house, several sources concur that the main structure is from 1820 or later:
HABS: http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/r?ammem/hh:@FIELD(DOCID+@BAND(@lit(LA0022)))
Kingsley, Karen. Buildings of Louisiana, Buildings of the United States. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.  ISBN: 0195159993  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wistungsten (talk • contribs) 05:14, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Age of Building
Talk:Tony Cetinski

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 17:48, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Category talk:Tribes of Assam

message: This category should be renamed either :Category:Ethnic communities of Assam or :Category:Communities of Assam.  Tribes are classed so after the relevant schedules of the Constitution of India.  There are a number of demands by different communities for inclusion in these schedules.  So Wikipedia should replace "Tribes" with either "Communities" or "Ethnic communities".  Chaipau 18:01, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename category
Template talk:English Football League seasons

message: I just aligned the rows so that the pipes (|) and the years 01, 11, 21 etc are in line. I also added  at the start of the rows ending in 1900 and 2000 to counter the additional two digits. Furthermore, I changed the title bar link to the best mainspace alternative.  Sʟυмgυм • т • c  18:04, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ch-ch-changes

message: Just wondering why this template was created when Template:The Football League seasons has been around since August 2006.  - Dudesleeper ·  Talk 19:23, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The difference is where most of them go to. Kingjeff 20:34, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Why are all of the seasons in the middle of this template redirects to seasons in English football? - Dudesleeper ·  Talk 20:47, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Were those seasons not canceled because of the war? Kingjeff 21:02, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, yes, the war. Basil! - Dudesleeper ·  Talk 21:04, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplication 

message: I wondered if the template might look better divided into groupings, rather than as one big list. I was thinking maybe something like this:   Any comments welcome. --Jameboy (talk) 00:18, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Idea
Talk:Indatraline

message: Balnibarbarian (talk) 01:24, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi there, also not a chemist but it does seem like the superposition principle can also be applied to pharmacology as a way to determine drug concentrations in the body after multiple doses of many drugs, among other things. You are right that the linked Wiki does not discuss this at all, maybe it should? I ultimately wound up removing that line entirely because the other provided citation did not seem to have anything to do with superposition. Pesto the Cat (talk) 16:40, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Superposition

message: Indatraline is the title, followed by „Indatraline hydrochloride (Lu 19-005) is an antidepressive agent and…“
Why are we now talking about the hydrochloride salt of indatraline and not about indatraline? StrangeCreamBrew (talk) 03:26, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title and initial name.
Talk:Laura Plantation

message: The source mentioned for Alcee Fortier collecting Brer Rabbit folktales at Laura Plantation mentions nothing about Fortier's contribution to folk lore NOR of his association with Laura Plantation.  Is it enough to say he "may have" collected these folk tales without a specific source quoted?  We need something less vague.  Mrbentley (talk) 02:28, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brer Rabbit? 
Talk:Neonatal isoerythrolysis

message: The redirect Fading kitten syndrome has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  JoelleJay (talk) 21:23, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Fading kitten syndrome]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Television stations in Omaha, Nebraska

message: I want to merge three articles: Television stations in Omaha, Nebraska and Radio stations in Omaha, Nebraska, and Print media in Omaha, Nebraska to create a more comprehensive article called Media in Omaha. I think that would be a better type of article for a media market the size of Omaha, and allow readers a more comprehensive scan. – Freechild (¡!¡!¡!¡) 21:22, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger
Talk:Wallington Hall

message: The house at Wallington is called 'Wallington', and not the commonly misused name of 'Wallington Hall'. The building itself has a hall in it that was created when the courthard in the middle was covered over during one of the rebuilds. -  Rupertcheswright (talk)
: This claim would seem to be correct (as per Rupertcheswrightthe National Trust page on Wallington. — Grstain | Talk 19:28, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hello! During late June, July and some of August, I'm working on a paid project sponsored by the National Trust to review and enhance coverage of NT sites. You can find the pilot edits here, as well as a statement and contact details for the National Trust. I am leaving this message when I make a first edit to a page; please do get in touch if you have any concerns. Lajmmoore (talk) 15:59, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  National Trust pilot 

message: Really feel like article is limited, and does not discuss the handover from the Trevelyan family to the national trust, as well as other factors - like the housing of evacuees during WW2. I am personally do not know in enough detail to expand the article, but i think it would be worthwhile if someone could! Habat1165 (talk) 19:12, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs more modern detail.