lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:John Mashey

message: In case anyone comes back to edit this page, they might want to check Ed Wegman, Yasmin Said, Milt Johns Sue John Mashey For $2 Million.  Of course, as a blog, that's not RS, but it includes copies of various court records, and directions of how to get them if somebody wants to check. Of course, they are primary sources, which make them hard to use in Wikipedia, even of they are strong evidence in the real world. For instance, it is a fact that Wegman's complaint said what it did, although course that doesn't imply that what was said was true.  For example, some were trivially false:
'7. In March of 2009, Defendant John Mashey, via the web blog Deepclimate.org performed an analysis of the Wegman Report that purported to show plagiarism by Wegman.’  False: Dec 2009, Deep Climate, not me.
8. In March of 2010, based on Mashey's writings, Raymond Bradley, of the University of Massachusetts, made a complaint to Said's employer, George Mason University, alleging plagiarism in the report from one of Bradley's textbooks.’  False, based on work of blogger Deep Climate.
 
9. Two different committees investigated the charges and no plagiarism was found.  False, by FOIA  JohnMashey (talk) 22:33, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wegman and Said Lawsuits 2014-2015 

message: I don't know if you anybody can use any of these, but Big Data - Yesterday,Today, and Tomorrow was an invited talk 09/16/13 for a local meetup group, and then at Stanford 05/08/14, see video  and again 08/18/15 for IEEE Computer Society of Silicon Valley. JohnMashey (talk) 06:53, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Big Data - links to slides & video of invited talks 

message: The text says " trustee of the Computer History Museum in 2008." and cites the Computer History Museum profile, which doesn't give a date, but 2008 is certainly wrong.
The correct date is 2000, although the earliest Web page I could find easily was from 2003: 2003 Board.
My wife and I were actually recruited by Gordon Bell and Len Shustek in 1996 to get involved, and we were Founding Members (as per the board in Museum), but I doubt that's published anywhere.
A missing award is:
Mashey received Pennsylvania State University's  1997 Outstanding Engineering Alumni Award for Computer Science, the first for that department after it had moved to Engineering.JohnMashey (talk) 20:43, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error, in case any edits this page, plus missing award 

message: the over all way this is written, it sounds like ad advert for Dr Mashey and is in my opinion very inappropriate  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:197:D00:3CA0:FD75:2430:51B3:BCC5 (talk) 21:52, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: over all tone is in appropriately laudatory
Template talk:Brown Cabinet

message: I have revised the cabinet list in line with that at http://www.numberten.gov.uk/output/Page1371.asp, which involves knocking a few names off. Please note that being a minister in the government is not the same as being a cabinet minister! Grblundell 17:40, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

message: The template's groups weren't made for so many section within them and the format I tried out simply doesn't give an accurate portrayal of cabinet. When the "Alsos" and the "On agendas" are thrown into the mix we have an even greater disparity because they are can fit into any of the three categories at the whim of the prime minister after a reshuffle. There is also the problem of what order to list them because the order of seniority also changes based on the prime minister's whim. It was a good effort to show all former cabinet ministers but was ended up being cluttered and unattractive. All former ministers are on the Brown Ministry page which needs, unfortunately, a good deal more prose and better than I can give. Therequiembellishere (talk) 18:31, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reason for my rv 

message: instead of just adding the names of the ministers which most people outside the UK (probably withing too) will have no idea, i think it might be a good idea to summarise which ministry they have. For example: Darling (Exchequer), Miliband (Foreign [and Commonwealth])Lihaas (talk) 08:21, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  MInistries of ministers 

message: Now that Brown is out this template is in an odd state and we must figure out what we shall do with it.  I have come up with four possible options:
* Keep as is, showing the final cabinet.
* Keep in the current format, add former ministers (ex: Hazel Blears, Catherine Ashton, James Purnell...) in alphabetically.
* Move to a list form with different groups (see previous edits).
* Delete the template (pretty much the nuclear option).
Please add any other options which come to mind. -Duffy2032 (talk) 04:52, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Keep with final cabinet and also add in former Cabinet ministers under Brown, then it will be a comprehensive reference, supplementing Brown Ministry. The format could be improved though, a bare list of names is a bit odd. Shouldn't their Cabinet posts also be included, a la :Template:Tony Blair Cabinet? Fences&Windows 12:45, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: That would certainly be the preference, however the number of groups to cabinet positions could be disproportionate and there may not be enough room.-Duffy2032 (talk) 08:31, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

text: Good for a start. You should use that to replace the current template, though I still think the comprehensive approach is best for posterity. Fences&Windows 00:26, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: What to do
Talk:E for all

message: Holy mother of glossy advert. Did someone simply call a PR contractee and have them copy in the brochure? This is eye-wateringly advertorial, and needs some massive pruning and retuning.Dxco 17:43, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ahahah! Check the IP - this was written by someone from Young and Rubicam, an ad agency.Dxco 17:46, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Mind Game (novel)

message: Thought that it was best to move this rather than delete it as it will be easier to find citations for them than it will be to build a list of citations without them.
*Bookscan Bestseller List 
*B&N Mass Market Bestseller List 
*Walden Mass Market Bestseller List 
*B&N Romance Bestseller List 
*Walden Romance Bestseller List 
*Wal-Mart Bestseller List 
*Amazon Bestseller List 
*B&N Online Bestseller List 
*B Daltons Bestseller List 
*Borders Bestseller List 
*Siren Books Bestseller List 
*Reviewers International Organization List
perfectblue 17:45, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair enough. The reason I incorporated only three (the most notable, in my opinion) was that I thought the list too long and rather trivial. I might add that a title making the bestseller list of The New York Times most probably hit the B&N Romance Bestseller list and others. Victoriagirl 19:14, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Recently deleted content
Talk:Angle of the mandible

message: Easily represented in parent article Tom (LT) (talk) 20:59, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. I feel so. (P.S. I think External occipital protuberance and Inion are in similar situation - Certain place and its highest point.) --Was a bee (talk) 17:10, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Gonion]] 
Talk:Nasal bone

message: The introduction and "Surfaces" section are lifted directly from the original (public domain) edition of Gray's Anatomy, without attribution. Is this consistent with Wikipedia's policy? (I understand that it's okay to use public domain text like this, but should it be attributed?) Here's a link to the Gray's article http://www.bartleby.com/107/37.html Leonard of Vince (talk) 19:45, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copying
Talk:NATO bombing of Vardarska street

message: The picture in the opening infobox (debris crushing a Yugo) illustrating destruction on Belgrade's streets. However, the same picture appears on Kosovo War, and is captioned as damage in Kosovo. I don't know where the picture was taken, but it can't be both Belgrade and Kosovo.  Dchall1 18:10, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: today's aerial bombigs are carried out by missiles, also. --TheFEARgod (Ч) 10:47, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture and caption
Talk:Wendell Beitzel

message: This might be added with a better source:
: The Hon. Wendell R. Beitzel M’78/M’88 is being honored by the Garrett College Board of Trustees by renaming Garrett College’s Career Technology Training Center in Accident after him. Wendell retired from the Maryland House of Delegates on Jan. 11, 2023, after 16 years of service.
Pemilligan (talk) 20:33, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. -- Pemilligan (talk) 01:27, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible addition
Talk:Tullamore

message: Is it just me or does this seem a bit exaggerated? "and also played host to the 'World Sheep Dog Trials' in 2005 which attracted huge international interest in the region." It might be an internationally reknown thing, but "international interest in the region" seems to contradict each other...
I've changed that - and several other bits. Sarah777 (talk) 19:10, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Jamie Macpherson

message: Can the term "tinker-gypsy" be clarified please - are we talking about Romanis, Scottish Travellers (or Tinsmiths)? Mutt Lunker 21:57, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: tinker-gypsy

message: The extract from his sentence says that he was to be hanged on Friday 16th November.  However the 16th of November was a Saturday in 1700 by the Julian calendar then in use in Britain, and it was a Tuesday by the Gregorian calendar.  Also by the Julian calendar it was a Thursday in 1699 and a Sunday in 1701. PatGallacher (talk) 20:47, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of execution

message: *  —chaetodipus (talk) 07:06, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possibly useful source
Talk:Throat

message: The first reference link doesn't work, please remove. I dont know how.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.135.158.20 (talk) 07:40, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference 

message: , you removed the stub notice I added. What is your criteria that this article is not a stub? Did you go by numbers - 3 paragraphs, 15 sentences, 256 words, 1254 characters? Even going by the characters standard, this is a stub. Especially for a topic - Throat. Please justify.  Jay (Talk) 16:30, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes: three well-sourced paragraphs and a couple of useful illustrations, plus the fact that it has been assessed by other editors as "Start" (see talk page). There is no template to add to say "This article should be expanded", although there is the "This section needs to be expanded" template which you previously added. If you think this article is seriously inadequate, divide it into sections and label the section(s) which need expansion - or expand it. Or perhaps post here on the talk page to discuss what more you think the article should include. Thanks. PamD 16:45, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I only looked at WP:Stub and did not realize it runs contrary to the content assessment ratings. So are there rules that if an article has a content rating that is not stub, we cannot add a stub notice, or if an article is content assessed as not stub, an existing stub notice can be removed? I did not add the section expand notice though,  did.  Jay (Talk) 17:50, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

text: Added back stub tag as no response was forthcoming.  Jay (talk) 06:37, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: , stub sorter here; it is not a stub: multiple sourcing, multiple paragraphs, infobox w/ image. However, it is certainly on the border between start and stub so it is understandable. Curbon7 (talk) 06:44, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: So again, are you going by the content assessment ratings or WP:Stub?  Jay (talk) 07:28, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stub or not?
Talk:Old Spanish Trail (auto trail)

message: Mansfield was driving the trail, U.S. Route 90, when she was killed in the auto accident.  She was traveling from Biloxi, to New Orleans.  I'm unsure if that is "trivia" or "history" as it pertains to the roadway.
K3vin (talk) 00:50, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jayne Mansfield
Talk:Arrowhead Trail (auto trail)

message: The original route of the Arrowhead Trail was not along the US 91 alignment east of Las Vegas. It followed a route through Nellis Air Force Base, then along the hills and through the Muddy Hills to merge with Valley of Fire road. It went to St. Thomas which is now partially submerged under Lake Mead. The dirt road of the Trail still leads to the town. It crossed the Muddy and Virgin rivers south of the "Lost City" Anasazi site, then headed northeast along the east side of the Virgin river to Bunkerville and Mesquite. By 1930, the Arrowhead had moved north (passing through Crystal) along a path that eventually became US 91. -- Parsa (talk) 21:56, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arrowhead trail east of Las Vegas 

message: *
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*Arrowhead Trails Association incorporation: 1) https://businessfilings.sos.ca.gov/frmDetail.asp?CorpID=00083411 2) http://california.14thstory.com/arrowhead-trails-association.html
— ★Parsa ☞ talk 02:23, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 
Talk:Bankhead Highway

message: It seems to me that this section, before the state x state descriptions start, should include an explicit statement that the Bankhead name pre-dates all US and most state route numbers, and thus the descriptions given are modern approximations and would be gibberish to a traveler of the original auto trail. 
This is not to say that the state x states are faulty.  It just seems to me that a reader who is unclear about what an auto trail is vs what a US or state highway is might not grasp the important fact that the Bankhead Highway came long before, for instance, US Highway 78, and that the route of 78, like other highways mentioned, is sometimes so far removed from the original Bankhead that, for hundreds of miles, one might not even catch a glimpse of it from the modern route as described. Berberry (talk) 22:16, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Route Description

message: The current article seems well beyond stub status, and should be promoted to Start status. It needs a history section and some images, but exits and junctions are kind of meaningless for a pre-1926 highway. Also, the criteria for importance for auto trails needs to be different from modern road systems. Those criteria need to be discussed in the auto trails project page. I would suggest here that any auto trails shown on maps of the entire USA by Rand McNally should be at least high importance. Certain routes in that set that were the major named transcontinental trails should be given top importance. The Bankhead certainly qualifies for the latter. — ★Parsa ☞ talk 00:11, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quality and importance
Talk:Ministry of Railways (India)

message: सर, 
विदर्भ महाराष्ट के 18% लोगों को अपने घर जाने केलिए 
कोई भी गाड़ी नागपुर से उत्तर प्रदेश तथा बीहार जाने के
लिए नहीं है, एकमात्र गाड़ी गोंदिया से है जो नागपुर से 130
कीलोमीटर जाने पर मिलती है।
यदि नागपुर से नई गाड़ी चलाई जाए अथवा गाड़ी सं  15231/15232 को गोंदिया के बजाय नागपुर से चलाई 
जाए तो जनता को सुविधा भी होगी तथा दलालों पर रोक 
भी लगेगी ।
इस रूट पर प्रथम श्रेणी कोच किसी भी गाड़ी में नहीं है 
यदि यह सुविधा दीजाती है तो आय भी बढ़ेगी और बिना
टिकट चलने वालों को भी रोका जा सकता है।
नवीन पाठक 
नागपुर 
9823049283 001navin (talk) 20:17, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:     उत्तर प्रदेश तथा बीहार को नागपुर से जोड़ने के लिए । 

message: I propose to merge Minister of Railways (India) into this article, since there's not enough content to keep two separate ones. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 12:02, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: pls merge with Minister of Railways as no longer to create separate page for same thing. Add both pages content into one. Ayushmaan14 (talk) 16:23, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge and Delete this page with Minister of Railways (India) Page
Talk:Austin Grossman

message: The article says that "Soon I Will Be Invincible" is being made into a movie, but checking the Hollywood Reporter, which is an authoritative source for films in production,  it's not coming up in search. Added a  tag. --John Nagle 19:12, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need citation for movie 
Talk:Hayes & Yeading United F.C.

message: Players is bugged out? NotArsk (talk) 18:26, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Players
Talk:All-pay auction

message: Shouldn't there be something said about the only way to win an all pay auction is not to play, for example the dollar auction?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.255.83.121 (talk) 06:13, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No, because it's not true.  (If you and I are in a dollar auction and I know that your strategy is not to bid, then it's optimal for me to bid; I'll receive the prize for a pittance.)  A more correct warning would be, don't participate in an all-pay auction without taking into account that it is an all-pay auction -- but that's self-evident, isn't it?  Joule36e5 (talk) 04:25, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Never play an All Pay auction
Wikipedia talk:Notability (highways)/Archive 03

message: There are a good deal of articles about county routes in New York State. Are these notable? There is even a very active wikiproject for them. I am believing that they are notable. Smartyshoe 15:58, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: See the discussion above. But, based on my cursory examination of the discussion (and my own beliefs regarding non-statewide county route systems), the answer is no. --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 21:22, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

text: I think this guideline is more aimed at protecting the short one or two sentence stubs that are out there.  I think if you have a well written, well sourced article on one of these NY county routes, you shouldn't have anything to worry about.  --Holderca1 21:56, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Personally, I think this guideline should be discouraging the creation of the one or two sentence stubs, allowing articles to be created on intra-county routes only if there's actually something to write about (such as if the road is a former state or U.S. route). Now, I've just jumped into this, so I don't know where this is going, but those are my two cents. --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 04:13, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That was basically what I was trying to say, it is hard to write a well sourced article if there isn't anything to say about it. :) --Holderca1 10:41, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  County Road Question 

message: Two points....a)  please format the talk page as to where you want the third party comments to go; and 
b) I stumbled onto this quite contentious discusion from the request for comments page.  My first thought is that there seems to be confusion about the difference between the designation of a highway or road, and who maintains it.  In California, where I am the state government (CalTrans) handles the interstates, the US highways, and most of the state highways.  County and City governments handle the county highways (of which there are not really that many), some of the state highways, and all the regualar roads and streets.  Good Luck  Rocksanddirt 23:56, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding the request for comments
Talk:2007 Wimbledon Championships – Women's singles

message: Is there a better title for this article, one that doesn't involve the unconventional dashes? Italiavivi 19:23, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unusual naming format 

message: 23rd seed Venus Williams defeated Marion Bartoli in the final, 6–4 6–1. Williams, ranked 31st at the time, remains the lowest ranked and seeded player ever to win a Grand Slam.
Goran Ivanisevic won Wimbledon as a Wild Card entry, as his ranking would not let him even get to the main draw without qualification. I'm sure that must have been much lower, probably not even Top 100. Perhaps the sentence means lowest ranked winner of women's Grand Slam? 82.141.125.149 (talk) 00:55, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: And now, after looking the source and some other Grand Slam results, seems that it is only lowest for a woman and at Wimbledon. Though, as it is in the source: "lowest ranked at No. 31 and lowest seed at No. 23 to win at Wimbledon". Serena Williams won Australian Open earlier same year as unranked, so I think that is also lower. 85.217.44.122 (talk) 00:03, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lowest seed to win?
Talk:Hrvoje Ćustić

message: Although I don't speak Croatian, I think his name should be changed from Ćustić to Čustić. Maybe someone can verify this... --86.101.108.121 (talk) 11:07, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: I'm Croatian and it is "Ć", it's not "Č".. RIP :( --Amellonn (talk) 09:06, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 
Talk:List of liberal arts colleges in the United States

message: There is a significant number of instiutions on this list that are not, in fact, liberal arts colleges. These schools include research institutions (some rather famous, like Brandeis), smaller graduate-focused institutions, medium sized universities, medium-sized public universities (perhaps intended as liberal arts colleges, but no longer such), and no longer even existent schools. I have tried to remove all of the ones through to Massachusetts and will continue on from there, though there are a few border line cases that I have generally left in place (Loyola University New Orleans is an example). Some institutions, like Boston College, will likely pop-up again, so anyone who cares should keep an eye on the situation. Harel Newman (talk) 07:09, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Removing non-Liberal Arts Colleges

message: Although it's not a member of the Council of Public Liberal Arts Colleges, should we nonetheless consider Richard Stockton College of New Jersey a liberal arts college? --71.111.194.50 (talk) 19:37, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Richard Stockton College
Talk:Tumor marker

message: This theme doesn't work very well, or at least is not well explained.  Consider AFP, which seems to be rather intermediate between the two classes.  In babies AFP is normally elevated but in adults elevated AFP is a fairly good sign of something wrong.  Either cancer or liver disease.  I propose to rewrite this article to roughly "grade" each tumor marker by how sensitive and specific it is.  Some are very nonspecific, so can be used for screening but not diagnosis.  Some may be specific enough to be used for diagnosis. --Una Smith 12:32, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree the current classifications isn't that good. I'm changing it to "Tissue specific tumor markers" and "Other tumor markers" until a better solution is found. Mikael Häggström (talk) 11:24, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, I've decided to make a table of them, so that they can be classified by various modalities at the same time. Mikael Häggström (talk) 11:39, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Cancer- vs tissue-specific

message: Add Gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) per  Glow green for go: scientists develop cancer marker 28/11/11 12:13 CET by University of Tokyo's Yasuteru Urano?  99.181.131.33 (talk) 00:20, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add GGT? 

message: - Not sure about this - what would we call it? cancer and tumor biomarkers?  Some tumors are benign, and some cancers like leukemia are not tumors. - Rod57 (talk) 18:01, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested merge with [[cancer biomarkers]] 

message: Intro says "Most tumor markers are tumor antigens, but not all tumor antigens can be used as tumor markers." but no source. It would be helpful to know which tumor markers are not tumor antigens, and which tumor antigen can not be used as tumor markers, and why. - Rod57 (talk) 18:18, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relation to [[tumor antigen]]