lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Huang Fei Hong

message: I added some sections and rearranged content a bit, but I think the article needs a bit more cleaning up.  Definetely needs some sources.  Mtelewicz 22:14, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Added sections

message: I've always believed that the more popular romanization of the name was the Cantonese Wong Fei Hung.  Almost all of the Wong Fei Hung films are Hong Kong productions in Cantonese.Dspserpico 03:28, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wong Fei Hung or Huang Fei Hong?
Talk:Ciáran Whelan

message: What year was he captain 2002?
:Not sure. 2002:Coman Goggins, 2003: Ciáran Whelan 2004: ?, 2005:Paddy Christie, 2006:Colie Moran. Im not sure if they're right, but thats what I think it was, meaning he was 'an captaein' in 2003. Correct me if I'm wrong.--Play Brian Moore 03:43, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  What year?
Talk:The Sacrifice (2005 film)

message: A nicely done advertisement for an as-yet unreleased film (the first feature film for its makers, Dunkirk Studios).  There are half a dozen more significant films with this same title (one in 2003, one in 2004, etc) listed at IMDB.  There is no IMDB listing for this film yet.  If it gets released, an article may be appropriate, since the threshold for inclusion at Wikipedia is very low, so I'm resisting the temptation to AfD the page. Slowmover 22:19, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I know this was a long time ago, but I'd just like to set the record straight: The Sacrifice was released before this article was created. However, its release was very small, and formal DVD sales did not start until somewhat later. Having seen this at Gaylaxicon, and having taken part in many VfD discussions myself (what's now called AfD), I felt that the movie was substantial enough in terms of being screened at a number of notable events on the East Coast in MA, FL, and NJ among others. It's certainly not as notable as a limited-release indie film, but not everything that's notable enough for Wikipedia is. The article is not an ad, though I suppose it has some effect in that respect. If there's anyting about the article which anyone feels is not up-to-par, feel free to fix it. -Harmil 02:17, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Jour de fête

message: It's not "unclear" which version is which. There are three different versions of the film:
*The b/w version released in 1949.
*The 1964 version where Tati added a framing narrative of a painter who adds paint by hand to individual image parts of particular shots in the film by painting on the filmstrip.
*The 1995 restored living-color version co-funded by German ZDF. ZDF had actually gone back into the vaults and took the three different Thomsoncolor strips (red, green, blue) and printed them according to 1990s standards, like a classical Technicolor film.
It's pretty obvious at just a glance which version you're looking at. Here's a source with comparison shots of all three versions, plus an even newer BD telecine of the 1995 version:  --2003:EF:1700:B464:F469:E833:7086:4D82 (talk) 15:26, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not "unclear"
Talk:Speedy Trial Clause

message: The supreme court has ruled that you cannot appeal on the grounds of the denial to the right to a speedy trial before the trial has been held: UNITED STATES v. MacDONALD, 435 U.S. 850 (1978).
In a later decision they held that the right to a speedy trial commences after indictment - not after suspicion or first arrest: UNITED STATES v. MacDONALD, 456 U.S. 1 (1982).
Both cases are in the neverending legal saga of Jeffrey MacDonald. Both decisions overturned 4th Circuit court decisions.user:badtypist
Basrker v. Wingo actually proposes a 4 part test: Length of delay, reasons for the delay, the defendant's assertion of his right to a speedy trial, and the prejucdial effect of the delay on the defendant.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.40.173.210 (talk) 21:12, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The term "speedy" is incredibly subjective; depending on context it could mean milliseconds or eons. This article does not provide that context.162.218.212.1 (talk) 15:26, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Actual time-frame
Talk:Salem Street Burying Ground

message: I was able to verify the claim that this is on the National Register of Historic Places. ; search for state MA, name "Burying" and it is the 7th one on the list:
"MA   	 Middlesex   	 Salem Street Burying Ground   	 Medford Sq.   	 Medford   	 1981-08-27"
Peyna 22:29, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  National Register of Historic Place 

message: What does the following passage mean:
The details of 35 graves have been documented. Starting from the Burying Ground's northwest corner and working eastward, the graves were selected for documentation in alternating groups of five (five were chosen and their data recorded, the next five were skipped, the following five chosen, and so on). The information collected included first and last names, ages, birth dates (when available), death dates and gravestone iconography. Also included were any pertinent titles (Deacon, Captain, Major, etc.).
Where is this information documented? Why weren't all graves documented?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Onlynone (talk • contribs) 20:43, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Documented Graves
Talk:Parallel evolution

message: Why is there a "bee hovering in flight" image on the page? There's no mention of bees in the article. Did they evolve in parallel? --Kaz 22:31, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It was orphaned when a convergent evolution example (hovering bees vs hovering hummingbirds) was removed.  I will remove it. StuRat 05:39, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

text: I agree.  I wanted to add some examples but had no way to know which of these three cases they were, so just guessed.  I would think even a scientist would have difficulty determining if things evolved from "similar" or "different" starting points, and at the same time, or not.  I would prefer a single article, under "parallel evolution", which includes the other two terms.  Those articles could then be redirects here.  To me, it's like having one article on cars which includes mentions of front-wheel drive, rear-wheel drive, and all-wheel drive, versus having different articles on front-wheel drive cars, rear-wheel drive cars, and all-wheel drive cars.  The different articles would be excessive. StuRat 12:46, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Wouldn't these closely related articles on convergent evolution, parallel evolution and divergent evolution be better treated as one article? There seems to be a lot of repetition between them and none of the articles are very long by themselves. Richard001 (talk) 11:31, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge? 

message: The article contains the following example of parallel evolution:
"The extinct pterosaurs and the birds both evolved wings as well as a distinct beak, but not from a recent common ancestor."
Why is this example included? The last phrase seems to disqualify it (according to the definition in the intro), and the Convergent evolution article contains the same thing as "a classic example" of convergent evolution.192.249.47.204 (talk) 19:17, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The text was added September 2008. You could try editing the article or ask for opinions at WT:WikiProject Evolutionary biology. Johnuniq (talk) 23:35, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad example? 

message: The hyperlinks in this paragraph need, IMHO, some attention.
The word "mole" in "likewise marsupial and placental moles" links to the "marsupial mole" page.
"flying squirrels" links to the "Sugar glider" page.
And "mice" links to Antechinus.
Masonmilan (talk) 12:18, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parallel evolution between marsupials and placentals 

message: What does it stand for? Threonine is the most obvious candidate, but there are 2 others with names starting with T. The Crab Who Played With The Sea (talk) 19:42, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  T undefined in parallel/divergent/convergent diagram legend.
Talk:Membership history of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints

message: What are secondary sources for full membership? I know that there are (year and country picked at random) things like "a 2001 survey of religious membership in Australia" which is used as a counterpoint, where the LDS church reported membership of 460,124 members and based on the survey membership in 205,000. But that says nothing about estimates for Tonga or France.Naraht (talk) 14:56, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Secondary Sources
Talk:Pamela Willeford

message: My original stub included
: She was one of two women in the party, which included the wife of neither man.
based on the Huffington lk (the only ext lk i put in, in that edit).  She treated at as one among two men & two women (besides of course the Secret Svc contingent), and A. H.'s site implied reason to suspect that each man was, uh, escorting one of the women.
Our article on the incident makes the non-security party 5, not four, which (if true) IMO makes her approach pretty tenuous. I'm removing the associated language (even tho it might be justified if our article turns out to be wrong about the pair of sisters being there).--Jerzy•t 22:37, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Composition of his party 

message: _ _ Re the most recent edit, the hunting party numbered 3, and Dick Cheney hunting incident needs correction in that regard.  The Armstrong sisters sat in the car, and were no more part of the hunting party than were the Secret Service team.
_ _ BTW, this is a main article. If you think of Dick Cheney hunting incident as this one's main article, you seriously misunderstand WP.--Jerzy•t 16:22, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  3, not 5, hunters 
Category talk:Charismatic and Pentecostal Christianity

message: From the category page:
:Do not list Charismatic or Pentecostal denominations here. Denominations may be found here.
:Only notable churches should be listed here - do not list any individual church that is not well-known.
That doesn't make any sense.  Categories are meant to be used.  If something isn't notable enough, then it should simply go thru AfD.  But if it fits into a category logically, it ought to be filed here. NickelShoe 22:39, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. The churches could all easily be added to the :Category:Pentecostal denominations or its subcats; also, the second qualifier is kind of redundant, given the existing notability guidelines. John Carter 01:38, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Not using categories?
Talk:List of writers from Northern Ireland

message: Surely this should be called list of Northern Irish Writers instead of Northern Ireland writers, a list of American writers wouldn't be called list of America writers. I would fix it myself but I don't know how to.
There are all kinds of political implications to calling someone 'Northern Irish,' so the current title is a good effort at ignoring them. Having said that, "Writers of Northern Ireland" is GRAMMATICALLY incorrect, implying that Northern Ireland is the SUBJECT of their writing. Can we please change it to the equally apolitical, but more grammatically accurate, "Writers FROM Northern Ireland"? Thanks BlackMarlin (talk) 13:17, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]]
Talk:Bruce Jones (comics)

message: Didn't realize someone had changed it to "aka" when I reverted it to "a.k.a." — I thought I was fixing something I'd written myself.  I couldn't find any guidance about the term at Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style, though that page does mention the Chicago Manual of Style — whose official page  doesn't say antyhing about the term. Since it's an abbreviation for "also known as", and not the word "aka", I'm wondering if the periods might not make it clearer? -- Tenebrae 22:58, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: A.k.a.

message: Is Bruce Jones best known for his recent Hulk run?  Nothing against those comics, but I suspect more comic readers remember his prolific 1980s output.  The article itself doesn't establish what makes the Hulk run special, other than that sales went up some unspecified degree, which is hard to put in context without sales figures for his other comics and novels.  If the criteria was quantity, Jones' the screenwriter may have had the largest audience.  --AC 09:05, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Possibly" best known for the Hulk? 
Talk:Brit Awards 2006

message: Now that the results are announced, as well as the winners being in bold, perhaps the accompanying pics ought to be of the winner rather than just another nominated entry's pic? --OscarTheCattalk 22:59, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's sometimes difficult to get images that have an acceptable license, so hopefully someone has some screencaps.  violet/riga (t) 09:57, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Pics

message: It would be very hard to justify a Fair Use rationale for applying copyrighted images on this article. Please study Wikipedia guidelines before adding pictures that aren't free. Most of the images that were used to illustrate this article have now been removed. __meco 11:07, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair Use images should not be used 
Talk:Nuke (Squadron Supreme)

message: Isn't he more of an analogue of Captain Atom?
::Possibly. DC brought Captain Atom (from the Charlton Universe) into the DC Universe during Crisis On Infinite Worlds (April 1985-1986), where as Nuke was created in Squadron Supreme issue 1 (late 1985). However, Captain Atom would not be a member of the Justice League until around 1988/1989(?), which is why most consider Nuke to be the Squadrons version of Firestorm (The Nuclear Man), who had been a Justice League member before Nuke was created. Also both have nuclear powers.Scarlettspiderg 21:01, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Alaa Abdelnaby

message: I don't see how this article meets any reasonable criteria for inclusion. Are we really looking to include articles on all the hundreds of thousands of athletes that have ever played professional sports? That's about the only notable characteristic of the guy, which is no offense, we just don't need articles on everybody. - Taxman Talk 23:04, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: @Bgwhite, why did you revert my edit on his current broadcasting job? This is what he's doing now. Jeff Worthington (talk) 03:05, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current Work
Talk:Ordination exams

message: Ordination exams are not exclusive to the PC(USA).  The article should either be expanded to reflect that, or this article should be moved.  raekwon 23:08, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Please indicate which other denominations that are known to have such exams then, so that they can be added. Badbilltucker 16:41, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Melkite

message: The fact remains that Melkites -- and, for that matter, Lebanese and Syrians of all confessions -- consider themselves Arabs, are recognized as Arabs by Arabic nations and speak Arabic.  To assert otherwise is a futile attempt to deny reality.
*They can consider themselves anything they want. Just because some Melkites see themselves as Arabs does not mean that they are of Arab ancestry. Most Melkites I know don't consider themselves Arabs, and rightly so. They just speak Arabic. Deny it all you want, but they are not Arabs. They're ancestry is non-Arab, like it or not! Thanks!
* Well, what ARE they, then? Do tell.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.78.255.105 (talk) 02:57, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: There are Christian’s who trace themselves to the pre Islamic arab Ghassanids who lived in the levant in 3rd century. 174.65.225.68 (talk) 15:12, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The etymological meaning of "malkaya" (Syriac) and "malaki" (Arabic) is "royal / kingly", from the root word "malik" which means "king".
Pertaining to the Melkites, it means "imperial" by extension, not etymologically.  The strict etymological meaning of "malkaya" and "malaki" is "royal / kingly".
The term "king" was perhaps applied by the Semitic people at that time to the Byzantine Emperor because they had no equivalent political office of an emperor in their own society.
Simply highlight the Arabic character for "malaki" in the article, right click, and choose "translate with Live Search".  It is translated as "royal", and not "imperial".
--Archestrategos (talk) 02:14, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Malkaya and Malaki

message: Page could use a demographics section, if the data is available. Mooonswimmer 16:31, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Demographics section
Talk:Solefald

message: in my opinion, i feel the pictures look like they are all over the place and sparatic. it just doesnt look right. User:panasonicyouth99 - 11:13, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Pictures

message: "Black For Death: An Icelandic Odyssey Part 2" it's not released yet.
--Judas 14:51, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Releases

message: <S>This bio is just a word for word copy off the band's myspace page, which would be painfully obvious to anyone who followed the link. That's a problem, right?Kgppra17 15:24, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Myspace 
Talk:Saab 17

message: There seems to be some confusion in the operators section. Was it Austria or Australia that operated the Saab 17? Now it lists Australia as an operator, but the Austrian Air Force as the arm that operated it. Uhu219 11:24, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Appears to be corrected by now. Austria operated a single aircraft for a brief time as a target tug. Per80 (talk) 00:27, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Operators

message: What´s the difference between Numbers built and Total production run? I suspect they mean the same thing, but they give different numbers. 1 September 2007  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.231.58.98 (talk) 00:29, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Numbers

message: Linking national origin is more properly a discussion for WT:AIR - from a quick survey of various pages, I cannot find any consistency, nor any discussion on the matter in the archives. Some pages are linked, others are not.
As for the name, wiki standards state that all caps is only to be used if the letters are read individually, regardless of the company's usage. That said, Saab AB is incorrect for the time period, as the AB in Saab means the same as the AB added afterwards - so it should be simply Saab. Spelling out the full name isn't all that useful either since there were several unrelated Swedish companies that used the same or very similar names, while Saab is distinct and recognizable. - NiD.29 (talk) 20:18, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  linking national origin and company name.
Talk:Deathmate

message: This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject.  If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class.  The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject.  Comics-awb (talk) 16:18, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Comics B-Class Assesment required

message: As this B-Class article has yet to receive a review, it has been rated as C-Class. If you disagree and would like to request an assesment, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment and list the article. Hiding T  13:54, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: C-Class rated for Comics Project
Talk:Wizard Entertainment

message: As this B-Class article has yet to receive a review, it has been rated as C-Class. If you disagree and would like to request an assesment, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment and list the article. Hiding T  14:50, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: C-Class rated for Comics Project

message: Anyone know why the name change took place again? Jedispyder (talk) 03:54, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wizard World Chicago name changed back to Chicago Comic-Con 

message: Wizard magazine has ceased publication after nearly 20 years, laying off its remaining staff and canceling freelance assignments. Its sibling publication ToyFare also has closed.Breaking: Wizard and ToyFare magazines fold  One-Time Runaway Success Story Wizard Magazine Folds 'Wizard' and 'ToyFare' Magazines Canceled -- R.I.P.  Mr JM  02:49, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: No Longer A Publisher

message: The article's name must be changed to Wizard World because the company's new name is Wizard World, Inc. Omegatiger121 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 18:57, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name Change 

message: Is there any good reason why Wizard (magazine) isn't merged into this article? FunkMonk (talk) 21:03, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Wizard (magazine) here 
Talk:First Republic (South Africa)

message: I'm uncomfortable with the title of this page as the terms or concepts of "first/second/third republic of South Africa" are not in general use, and suggest a particular, narrow view of the country's history. This impression is borne out by the fact that the original author has been banned from Wikipedia for a long series of controversial postings and clashes with other Wikipedia contributors.
I have replaced the pages about the second and third republics with redirects to the main South African history pages.  There was nothing new on these pages that is not covered on the mainline pages, so I felt comfortable deleting them.
On this page, I have removed the odd terminology and one-sided interpretations from this page, as well as some repeated information. The rest, relating to the declaration of the Republic of South Africa, is covered on the History of South Africa in the apartheid era page. 
The only links to these pages were created by the original author from disambiguation pages like First Republic. I've removed them, since the terminology is not in general use. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zaian (talk • contribs) 23:19, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Edward Sugden (Methodist)

message: "down the foundings of the college including the Sugden Principle." The what? Rich   Farmbrough. 23:20, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Query
Talk:Lambeg drum

message: Re:  this text:  The drum is sometimes also called "tibbies," "slashers," or "killymans."
Is this for more than one drum (all these terms appear in the plural, with final "s"), or is it for just one drum?  Badagnani 18:05, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A kilogram is about 2.2 pounds, so whatever is written in the article now is wrong.  Yes, it should be fixed, by someone who knows the exact weight the drum really is.  Badagnani 22:56, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: I would query the claim that Lambegs have not been paraded in Belfast for 50 years. I'm pretty sure I saw one in the 12th this year. Can we at least change it to 'rarely'? It's pretty difficult to prove that something hasn't happened once in 50 years... --Helenalex 21:28, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  not in Belfast? 
Talk:Demographics of Syria

message: Levantines are native to the Levant area, not Armenians, Assyrians, Druze, Turkmen, or Arab, and Arabs are native to the Arabian Peninsula, not to the area of the Levant.
Despite intermarriages and the influence of religion and language, the DNA still differs, the traditions differ, and the culture differ (despite both technically being Arab-speaking Levantines and Gulf Arabs are not the same)
The qualifications for an ethnic group usually require a unique history, culture, appearance (which is subjective), DNA markers, and language (In this case, it is a distinct accent). Mr1Elis (talk) 11:48, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The native ethnic group in Syria
Talk:Pete Morisi

message: The reference to his dates of birth and death links to a Social Security Death Index search on his Social Security number.  This seems like an inappropriate use of personal information to me.  Should this be deleted? Jkgree (talk) 20:47, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death reference