lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:National Anthem of Uruguay

message: Does anyone now who Fernando Quijano is? His bio says he wrote this anthem but is not mentioned MeltBanana 23:54, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: *There are no sources to verify the claims:
1. That Uruguay has dropped the long form of its name
2. That Uruguay has renamed the national anthem "national anthem".
--M@rēino 23:12, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes.  I'm quite curious about which opera this comes from as well.  I heard the anthem at the World Cup this summer and the first thing that popped into my head was bel canto (I would have guessed Rossini, but that's only because I've heard more of his operas).DavidRF (talk) 17:26, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I found a link that implies it might be connected to one of the numbers in Lucrezia Borgia (opera). .  I'm not familiar with that opera so I wouldn't be able to recognize a direct connection.DavidRF (talk) 17:44, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Accuracy dispute

message: Saying "The national anthem of Uruguay is the national anthem of Uruguay" is completely redundant.
Anybody here know the official name of the anthem? Isn't it "Orientales, la Patria o la tumba" ?
If it doesn't have an official name, then we should start the article saying something like: "The National Anthem of Uruguay was composed by....etc etc" Frankman 14:03, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: First Sentence

message: The section "Public execution lyrics", unless they are sung only at hangings, might be better as "Public performance lyrics". Does this make sense?
:LOL! I agree. Changed it.  Frankman 21:21, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  execution or performance? 

message: Allegedly, he composed a national anthem for Uruguay. Anyone know anything about the circumstances, or what became of that anthem? Otto von B (talk) 02:54, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Camille Saint-Saens? 
Talk:Invariant speed

message: "Special relativity is crucially based on the concept of inertial frames (IFs)...The crucial mathematical discovery that made SR possible was that, if one is willing to give up the idea of absolute time...then a whole new family of transformation groups becomes possible...These are the various Lorentz transformation (LT) groups, each characterized by exactly one finite invariant speed; that is, a speed that transforms into the same speed in all IFs.  The Gallilean transformation turns out to be that limiting LT which transforms infinite speeds...Of course, Einstein picked that LT group which leaves the speed of light invariant--exactly the content of his second axiom."--Rindler, Relativity: Special, General and Cosmological"''
Relativity, insofar as the invariant speed is concerned, is purely mathematical, so it cannot be disproven by having things travel faster than the speed of light.  If anything did travel faster than light, then it would just mean that Einstein picked the wrong LT group. DonQuixote 00:02, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, but how is this relevant to the article?  ‣ᓛᖁ[ ᑐ] 03:46, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It's just stating that the invariant speed is independant of the speed of light—it just that they seem to coincide.DonQuixote 06:05, 20 November 2005 (UTC)

text: Er, excuse me, but I don't think that this hits the point. In the mathematical formulation of special relativity, there is exactly one invariant speed, fixed by the representation of the Lorentz group that you choose. It is then predicted by Maxwell's theory, and verified by experimental evidence, that this speed is the speed of light. So these concepts coincide (and that's not coincidence, that's a prediction of the theory). It doesn't warrant a separate article. --B. Wolterding 17:34, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Invariant Speed vs. Speed of Light

message: The article has been rewritten per the AFD.  Much of the information in the old version was unecessary, confusing, and/or not entirely correct.  I intended for the new version to do nothing more than answer the question, "What is invariant speed?"  Readers can follow the links to find out more, or hunt down a copy of Mermin's paper, which I cited, and which contains a very nice discourse on invariant speeds.  I chose not to summarize his conclusions on this page as that is already done in postulates of special relativity.  Someguy1221 05:57, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite
Talk:Red wine

message: There should be a fuller discussion of the chemical composition of red wine. MPS 00:06, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: chemical composition 

message: Not sure there should be an article about red wine at all. Especially if it is just a very partial list. Maybe something very brief, but I dont see how it could be much more than a stub. Write something better and remove the list to convince me. Justinc 02:15, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I now see that there is a lot of overlap between this and the article winemaking. Should they be merged? Bordeaux2000 10:47, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This article should only contain information that is unique to red wine. General information should be in the other articles. Entire books have been written just about red wine, so there is enough known information available for inclusion and citation. (Heroeswithmetaphors) talk 21:43, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: merge

message: This word occurs towards the bottom of the article in Red Wine. Has anyone ever heard of this term? Google threw up nothing. Jelf0 (talk) 15:32, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Given that the sentence it was included in was incomplete itself (and that I found no sources on how exactly the climate matters when choosing the type of press), I've just removed the sentence entirely for now. Hopefully someone will know more about this than Google and correct it, but I doubt it. Bruberu (talk) 17:51, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slothrating
Talk:Upper ontology (computer science)

message: I moved this information from Ontology (computer science) as it seems to deserve its own page.
I edited the intro to
"Also known as Top Level Ontologies, or Foundation Ontologies
In Information Science, an Upper Ontology is an attempt to create an ontology which describes very general concepts that are the same across all domains. The aim for this is to have a large number on ontologies accessible under this Upper Ontology."
I did not edit anything else.
--RickiRich 00:06, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Helene Kottanner

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Edofedinburgh 03:17, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Tamara Braun

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- KenWalker | Talk 07:26, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Grande Torino

message: In my opinion, this article should be merged with Torino F.C.: it talks about a historical period of the team. --Angelo 00:21, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: After a better reading of the articles, I have quite realized that it is much far from being an encyclopedical article. It is clearly seen from the eyes of a fan, and thus I classified it as nNPOV. And, at last, it also needs to be wikified (the English on the article is crappy). --Angelo 03:52, 20 November 2005 (UTC)

text: Appreciable work; congratulations! About the merge issue, I think we better discuss here on this talk page. --Angelo 01:25, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This article("Grande Torino") is around 5Kb, the article about the Torino F.C. is around 7Kb; even combined they are nowhere near too long. I agree that this article is simply about a historical period of the team; I say "merge".Skydiver 16:37, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  This is a possibility. --QuQuqquu99 (talk) 13:59, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: This seems to be a direct google-translate of the same page on Italian wikipedia , which is itself seemingly a copy of http://www.toroclub.it/storia/gt/egt.htm. Do we need speedy deletion?  crh23 (talk) 11:02, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-free content 

message: I don't know what exactly happened when this article was created, but I don't think I've ever seen a more shambolic article on this encyclopedia. I wouldn't even know where to begin to fix it. In fact I wonder if it would be better to simply delete it and have relevant information about the Grande Torino team on the Torino F.C. main article. Italia2006 (talk) 02:47, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Horrible article
Talk:Mijailo Mijailović

message: Moved from the article:
:Mijailovic (MiMi) attact Anna Lindh exactly 105 years after Luigi Lucheni (LuLu) murdered Elisabeth of Austria (September 10, 1898).
Important? Interesting? The inclusion of it will need to be argumented for.
— Sverdrup 15:47, 21 Mar 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Good! --Ruhrjung 16:05, 21 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  1898 assassination 

message: Since the subject of this article is notable only for his having murdered the Swedish foreign minister, I wonder if this article helps add to the murderer's notoriety and might better be renamed "Murder of Anna Lindh". Objectivesea (talk) 19:38, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Honestly part of the content from Lindh's page could probably be split off and merged with this one to make an article on her death. Provided there are later sources for it. PARAKANYAA (talk) 05:31, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should article be renamed?
Talk:Downhill Battle

message: This article has some MAJOR NPOV problems. They really jump out at you, but in particular I cite the statement:
:We've spoken with dozens of the people who've been targeted, and these lawsuits are literally driving families into bankruptcy.
Who does "we" refer to? Was this article written by a member of Downhill Battle? Is this line just missing quotation marks?
Personally, I'm a huge supporter of filesharing and independent music, but I think this article sounds like it came straight from the group's website. 71.136.50.128 00:35, 20 November 2005 (UTC)

message: The official Web site, Grey Tuesday, and Fort Culture sites are all 404s right now.  --65.148.149.61 08:28, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Still on-line? 
Talk:Christ King

message: I moved the article from "King Christ" to this page Christ the King in order to use the correct form of the title.  "Christ the King" is correct.  "Christ King" is not only an incorrect title for this article, but "Christ King" is not even used in English to discuss "Christ the King or the Feast of Christ the King". Dgf32 04:33, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  rationale for move
Talk:The Southwestern States (of the U.S.A.)

message: Most or all of the information here seems to already be in Southern United States. Any reason to keep this article separate? Owen× ☎ 00:55, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I read 2nd Way to Split the U.S.A. before posting the  tag. I don't think we should create a new set of articles just because you came up with a new way to divide the US. If other people feel differently, your articles will stay. Owen× ☎ 02:06, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging with [[Southern United States]]
Template talk:TSFfooter

message: Hello.  Could a sysop please change the links from WP:DYK and WP:POTD to Wikipedia:Did you know and Wikipedia:Picture of the day respectively?  Thanks.  --  TomPreuss 01:08, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Good plan - now fixed. -- Solipsist 17:26, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Good work.  Thanks. --  TomPreuss 07:46, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Fix links
Talk:Richard Hilton

message: We need very reliable sources for a WP:BLP which says "Never use self-published sources – including but not limited to books, zines, websites, blogs, and tweets – as sources of material about a living person, unless written or published by the subject (see below). "Self-published blogs" in this context refers to personal and group blogs. Some news organizations host online columns that they call blogs, and these may be acceptable as sources so long as the writers are professionals and the blog is subject to the newspaper's full editorial control. Posts left by readers are never acceptable as sources." Wargs.com is self-published, and NNDB doesn't look reliable at all as a source. Dougweller (talk) 07:32, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthplace 

message: In the Kathy Hilton article Paris has two children.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:8109:AB8F:7800:4F9B:3AD0:9E62:523 (talk) 00:19, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The grandchildren count doesn't add up...
Talk:Laconia, New Hampshire

message: How come the article doesn't contain any mention of Bike Weekend? And I'm not sure that being a research fellow at Caltech qualifies someone as notable... I'll take a look at that article to see if there is some better justification. Doesn't Jim Sessler (former attorney general) live in Laconia? Maybe thats Gilford. Hmm. AvruchTalk 17:15, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I was always under the impression that the name Laconia was chosen in part as a pun on Lake. Yes, its a good name with an old world connection, but it's also a city built on a lakeshore in a region known for its many lakes. I don't even know if it's true or not, much less have a citation for it, but if someone, say, from the local historical society could look into it, I'm sure it would be a nice tidbit one way or the other for the article. Also, I apologize in advance for not signing this comment, its literally been years since I've done anything with Wikipedia besides reading it and I don't remember how to sign off properly.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.173.97.49 (talk) 01:55, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible Pun?

message: Does anyone have any solid references/evidence Laconia, NH is named after Laconia, Greece? According to the official history on the city website it was named after the Laconia Company.
"The town's name was likely taken from the name of the original company formed by the Captain John Mason and the Masonian proprietors in order to sell parcels to the original colonists during the colonial era: the Laconia Company."
https://www.laconianh.gov/500/Laconia-History LtPinecone (talk) 05:48, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: With the proper qualifiers (e.g. "according to the city of Laconia", leaving in "likely", etc.) this information is usable. Feel free to update the article. Ken Gallager (talk) 12:57, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Namesake
Talk:USS Point Cruz

message: Claude:
Just put in the information in the article; then in the list of references at the bottom, put in the name of the document "U.S.S. Point Cruz, CVE-119 1954, Ship's Cuise Book", (or whatever the exact name of the book is), the date, and the authors (if known).
147.240.236.9 21:34, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  List in the references 

message: Added a photo of the flight deck my father gave me - he served aboard this ship as an electrician at the end of WW2. Like some of the other men, he smuggled a camera on board and took this pic.207.250.21.216 (talk) 00:34, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flight Deck
Talk:Four Sticks

message: This song is also notable for its highly unusual rhythmic structure. The verses are in 5/4, whereas the bridge passages are in 3/4.
(Different person's comment) I saw the transcription with 5/4 & 3/4, in an old Led Zeppelin song book, but a classical musician told me that the 5/4 really should have been transcribed as 10/8. I don't remember his explanation very clearly, but as I recall it involved the fact that relevant section's rhythm is ONE-two ONE-two ONE-two-three ONE-two-three. (Mission Impossible's theme is similar except switched around, ONE-two-three ONE-two-three ONE-two ONE-two). I asked him for an example of authentic 5/4 (besides Philip Glass) and he eventually came up with Paul Bowles' song with Tennessee Williams lyrics "I Walk on Gilded Splinters."
I cannot see how this can be 10/8. Perhaps a classical musician would expect all the beats to be on a beat, in which case ONE-two ONE-two ONE-two-three ONE-two-three fits, but doesn't really show the feel of the riff. 
In rock and blues the off-beat is often emphasised, so in 5/4 the beat is:
1   2   3   4   5   1   2   3   4   5
C#  D   E     G     C#  D   E     G      
It is because the last note in the riff is on the off beat that gives it a different feel.Other somgs that are in 5/4
I have an "official" music book for Led Zeppelin IV, and it labels the riff as being in 5/8. I, being a guitarist, agree with this, because that's how often the guitar riff repeats itself. I also find this the most easy way to count it when playing it. 69.156.38.100 11:19, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: At any rate, it is hard to dance to.  Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 03:29, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rhythm 

message: This Wiki article says that there was only one live performance in 1971, but there is video in Youtube of a live performance in 1994, with the Egyptian Ensemble and the London Metropolitan Orchestra. Grunte (talk) 18:32, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Live performance in 1994
Talk:Atari Forums

message: fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 12:26, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I've Wikified the list properly and removed the block of text in the blue box near the end of the article - it was utterly pointless. I had a go at fixing the grammar but to be honest the entire second half of the article is pontless waffle that could refer to any forum on the internet.--Ukdan999 02:03, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Ballon d'Or

message: There is a mistake on the list of wins by country as Brazilian players won it 5 times (Ronaldo x 2, Ronaldinho, Rivaldo and Kaka) and not 4. 81.109.65.193 (talk) 13:40, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: Could not find the error; the Brazil entry in Wins by country clearly states there are 4 winning players and 5 wins in total. Liu1126 (talk) 19:46, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 20 March 2024 

message: The redirect European footballer of the year has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 10:32, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:European footballer of the year]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect Balon de Oro has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 10:35, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Balon de Oro]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect Balon D´Or has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 10:35, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Balon D´Or]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Christine (Cholmondeley novel)

message: There used to be two (almost?) identical pages, Christine (book) and Christine (1917). The latter now redirects here. <KF> 01:55, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I found this page through Special:Mostcategories because the article contains too many categories.  Could someone please clean up the categories so that it makes sense.  (What is this article about?  Is it about a person or a book?  Could someone write an introduction paragraph that clearly states this?)  Dr. Submillimeter 18:04, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the categorization warning because it was inappropriate.  Still, the categorization is confusing. Dr. Submillimeter 18:50, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Strange categorization; Please clean up the categories

message: Can somebody with knowledge on this subject please write a percise introduction as to what this article subject is? It currently takes like three paragraphs to comprehend what exactly this article is about.  --Oakshade 04:18, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Introduction

message: Note that there was another writer who published under the name Alice Cholmondely.  Alice Mary Egerton, died 27 November 1868, married Reginald Cholmondely on 17 October 1867. Two posthumus books of poetry were published, both edited by her husband. - one, simply Poems by A.C., as Alice Mary Cholmondely in 1871 and Emblems, as Alice Cholmondeley in 1875.94.139.27.74 (talk) 09:44, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:   Alice Cholmondeley
Talk:Oppau explosion

message: Ammonium nitrate was known to be explosive, but experiments showed that a mixture with at least 45 % of ammonium sulfate should lose the ability to explode. Unfortunately, the concentration of ammonium sulfate could have been lower, which was possible due to quality issues in testing it.--77.182.171.38 (talk) 23:56, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not known to be explosive? 

message: Reference 1/"frenchdoc", the one by the French Ministry of Environment, cites the German Wikipedia article. We should take care to make sure that no circular referencing occurs or has occurred. Forewarned = forearmed! 
Thanks, Tomásdearg92 (talk) 02:00, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Circular referencing 

message: I thought when I first read about this one, that is was ammonium sulfate and potassium nitrate.  Both are, as well as I know, separately not explosive.  Or maybe both ammonium and potassium nitrates. Gah4 (talk) 02:48, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  potassium
Talk:Somersworth, New Hampshire

message: The article states that 0.96% of Somersworth's 11,477 people are Asian, yet I have a source that claims 1,500 Indonesian Americans live in this town. I added a link to the article regarding this Indonesian community, yet these numbers need to be reconciled, as 1,500 out of 11,477 makes the Asian population a minimum of 13% of the town. ~ 65.23.129.243 (talk) 20:32, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The source cited for this data is Raude Raychel, the head organizer for "Jakarta Fair".  This is not a reliable source for demographic data.  WP:USCITIES states "The US Census should be the primary source of demographic data." Magnolia677 (talk) 20:40, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I've updated the Census Bureau figures to the 2010 census. There has been a notable increase in the numbers of the Asian community, split between Asian Indian and "Other Asian", but nowhere near 1,500. The 2011-2015 American Community Survey estimate shows continued increase (to c.329 Indian and c.258 other Asian), but not enough to add to the article, since the margins of error are wide. --Ken Gallager (talk) 12:42, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

text: The 2020 Census redistricting data shows 871 people identifying as "Asian alone", which is 7.3% of the total population. The breakdown within Asian should be coming out later this month. Ken Gallager (talk) 14:23, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Demographic discrepancy