lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Fishstick

message: Low importance C-Class article about a single fish product that is not a major contribution to American, Canadian or British cuisine. --Jeremy ( Blah blah...) 00:07, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WPFood Assessment 

message: I found some vandilisim on this page, was wondering if it was okay that i deleted it! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.133.203.125 (talk • contribs) 20:59, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure, thanks. Try to remember to sign your posts in the future, though. :) Merpin (talk) 16:51, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalisim

message: Do people really eat fishticks with syrup? It's quite probably my cultural bias speaking, but that just sounds...bizarre. Merpin (talk) 16:51, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Syrup?

message: do you like fishsticks?
oh, so do you like putting fishsticks in your mouth?
so are you a gay fish or something?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eric Forest (talk • contribs) 04:08, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for taking an interest in the article, but please note that the talk page is for taking *about* the article, not specifically about its subject. Also, please sign your posts. Thanks. SimonTrew (talk) 21:54, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: lol. Well, for the least some interest has been brought to fishsticks.--[|!*//MarshalN20\\*!|] (talk) 14:29, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  do you like fish sticks?
Talk:Votan

message: I have removed the recent addition placed in the article by , since its content seems to be a discussion or commentary on one aspect of this article, rather than an attempt to add encyclopaedic material to the article itself. Likely this was intended to be posted to the article's talkpage (ie here) instead; so am pasting the addition here below in full, plus adding Dreemw's sig to it for tracking. (ps. 'Aztlan' is a reference to the AZTLAN mailing list, now hosted at the FAMSI website. The discussions referred to can be read in the archives there).--cjllw ʘ TALK 07:19, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commentary/discussion transposed from article to talkpage 

message: Should we treating the unfound theories that Votan was linked with the people from Atlantis even worth mentioning. I am sure that there are serious experts on the field of Mayan mythology both could and should consulted instead.--96.46.201.195 (talk) 01:04, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  '''Review need'''
Talk:James S. Rains

message: It would be helpful if someone could add an image for James S. Rains. Red Harvest (talk) 06:32, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: 10 years after:
* 
* Gabriel James Rains
* James Edwards Rains
* James Spencer Rains?
* Searching a picture of Gen. James S. Rains, Civil War Talk
* Finally, LOC's Gabriel J. Rains was identified by the SNPG as James S. Rains
* Find a Grave already jumped on the bandwagon —  . --Taterian (talk) 01:27, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image Needed
Talk:National Resistance Movement

message: National Resistance Movement established participatory democracy through a policy of decentralisation and self-governance through local councils, <<leading to political empowerment of the people and social harmony>>.
By what metric? This is an unfalsifiable and unverifiable opinion.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1:927E:F6C2:955C:1CD:CBD7:EEB1 (talk) 11:28, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

message: isn't http://nrm.ug  the homepage of Nrm? Wikistallion (talk) 18:58, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  has party been dissolved? 

message: It used to be a Marxist-Leninist party but now is seen as right wing populist? Did the economic policies change? From what I can see, it's a syncretic party with left-wing economics but socially conservative, much like a lot of Eastern European socialist parties. 72.72.200.204 (talk) 14:31, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: While economics can be placed on a Right-Left spectrum, the political Right has never been universally defined as economically Right, rather the social and cultural positions are what such parties are truly defined by. IkonicDeath (talk) 05:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

text: https://votesonline.org/party/national-resistance-movement-uganda Describes it as formerly a marxist party that shifted to Right-wing populism and conservatism. It wouldn't be the only party to do so, Cambodian People's Party was original a communist party but became a conservative one. It should at least be listed as big tent, I don't see how saying the party is left-wing and bringing up "marxist and socialist" policies that don't even exist in the party anymore that has also descriminates against LGBT people which is generally almost always Right-Wing is going to help.  TYMR (talk) 16:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  How do we know it's right wing now?
Talk:Uganda People's Congress

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 22:50, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]]
Wikipedia talk:Fiction/Noticeboard/box

message: Figured this might be something interesting to test out, since there's been so many proposals and such recently. -- Ned Scott 06:46, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I would like to add the RfC on WP:EPISODE to the template.  Ursasapien (talk) 07:37, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

message: Is it okay if I add a mention of User:Pixelface/Fiction Survey 2009 to this template? It's still in my userspace because I would like input on it (edits, comments, criticisms, suggestions) before it goes live. Thanks. --Pixelface (talk) 17:55, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Fiction survey

message: WP:NOT#PLOT is a prohibition against articles that are comprised of plot summary only. If this probiiton were to be removed, it would suggest that articles that are purely plot summary would be allowable, and hence exempt from Wikipedia's content and style policies. --Gavin Collins (talk|contribs) 07:53, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot summary only
Talk:Kim Sơn district

message: What is the etymology of this place name? Badagnani (talk) 04:22, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Kim Sơn means Golden Mountain. And this is a new-founded district so that these is no Hán Tự.--AM (talk) 12:12, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Etymology
Talk:Labora Farms

message: Rearranged the references (but couldn't resolve an issue with the new command for listing references).
It seems that some material might be treated in one or two other articles. The article could have some basic info on location, for instance, as well as the agricultural and other productive activities of the project. --A12n (talk) 06:47, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revisions, comments 
Talk:Point Defiance Park

message: Comes off as wordy and casual, with numerous punctuation and grammar errors
.  Some interesting word choices too... "friendly stoners" is an obvious example.
 Well written article, reads almost like a travel brochure. I like it, but: "The Five"? Really?
 It is Five Mile Drive. Has always been called that. Signs indicate that and have for decades.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.253.103.151 (talk) 00:01, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Christy Woods

message: January 2020, There was serious miss information about the protection status of Christy Woods. It has no protection of any kind at this point. The property is simply owned by BSU and they can do what ever they want with it. While there are no plans to dramatically change the property, BSU has the right to do what they want when they want. The staff that manages Christy Woods are constantly working to protect the property and manage it as a botanical garden, but it doesn't have any special state or federal protections.  Making false claims of protection only brings unwanted attention to the property. We are forced to admit and clarify to those with the authority to seriously alter the property that it doesn't have any protection. This false information is doing far more damage than good.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.226.168.228 (talk) 16:02, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Land Protection
Talk:Education Reform Act 1988

message: This legislation was highly controversial, and an account of the politics of it is needed here, not just dry facts.  Deipnosophista (talk) 11:53, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  politics? 

message: London Government Act 1963 states that this act abolished the ILEA - but no mention here. Some clarification/addition needed. Jackiespeel (talk) 18:41, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Inner London Education Authority

message: This act never applied to Northern Ireland. Per SESC Briefing paper: Northern Ireland, December 2017: "The Education Reform (Northern Ireland) Order 1989 was the correspondent piece of legislation to the Conservative government’s 1988 Education Reform Act in England and Wales."
Algarve1233 (talk) 17:08, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Northern Ireland
Talk:Moses Fowler House

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.jconline.com/story/news/history/2016/03/18/moses-fowler-had-far-reaching-influence/81182194/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 20:05, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Airborne Surveillance Platform

message: Hi billcj,
I really thank for your efforts and i've been wondering how to add that template.
thanks,
I agree with your removal of the Aircraft oriented nature, but you've also removed the infobox, which i think housed budget, program start, test flight time among others.
But i have a small personal opinion though, doesn't JSF page has any images relating to the contestants or anything??
please do not take this offensively, 
I think some pictures to depicit the platform, rotodome, and other features should be presented to provide the visitor a real idea as to what it means.
Thanks
Swraj (talk) 12:49, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the comments. I forgot to leave the pic - sorry about that! I'll re-add it shortly. I tink it's the only one available, but any others that are leagally useable are welcome. As to the other info, those items need to be worked into the text in sentence form. Feel free to re-add them. - BillCJ (talk) 18:52, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  I welcome you changes, but.. 
Talk:Sycamore Row (road)

message: It is disputed whether the sycamores grew as the result of sprouts from a corduroy road. While the original historic marker at this site cited this story, a replacement marker calls their origin "uncertain."
https://www.in.gov/history/state-historical-markers/find-a-marker/find-historical-markers-by-county/indiana-historical-markers-by-county/sycamore-row/ mobilene (talk) 14:41, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of Sycamore Row unclear
Talk:Grissom Air Museum

message: This seems like a relevant factoid about the museum/base. I presume it tied to Gus Grissom, who died in the Apollo 1 fire the year before the change -- Was he known there, specifically, or was it just because he was from Indiana? OBloodyHell (talk) 09:46, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why the name change?
Talk:Autonomous county

message: Am I right that the Weixi Lisu Autonomous County appears twice on the list? Unless it's a case of two counties with the same name (and the same name for the administrative city), I think it's an error. If that's the case the number of autonomous counties in the article Autonomous areas of China should also be 116 instead of 117. --Thathánka Íyotake (talk) 01:39, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weixi Lisu Autonomous County 

message: Please add Ethnic composition--Kaiyr (talk) 11:01, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ethnic composition 

message: Please add Aspirant Autonomous counties of the People's Republic of China--Kaiyr (talk) 11:42, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aspirant Autonomous counties of the People's Republic of China
Talk:Hanford

message: I decided this should go directly to Hanford site, as many people call the Hanford site simply "Hanford." Most of the other links here are red links, and I believe people who type "Hanford" will usually want to go to Hanford site rather than to Hanford, California, Hanford, Washington (which no longer exists), or Hanford High School. I put a disambig link at the top of Hanford site to help any users who mistakenly end up there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Northwesterner1 (talk • contribs) 07:17, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The decision has been disputed.  Also, please do not do cut-n-paste moves. -- JHunterJ (talk) 19:06, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Model building

message: :The title is a bit ambiguous as it conjures up the picture of a model building, rather than building models LouisBB (talk) 07:33, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't quite grasp the difference between model building and building a models, please explain. TheKuygerian 00:35, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

text: The photo appears to be of somebody painting a miniature - not building a model  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.198.171.32 (talk) 07:14, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It does seem misleading. TheKuygerian 00:29, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

text: What if I keep the photo and change the caption? Change "A builder working on a model" to "A builder painting a model" TheKuygerian 00:33, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
Talk:Aquatic Volleyball

message: THIS GAME IS ALOT LIKE TENNIS,RACQUETBALL,PING PONG AND VOLLEYBALL IN A SENSE OF THE LETS, FAULTS,SERVE AND ROTATION. DUE TO SOME RULES BEING THE SAME IT DIFFERS BECAUSE IT IS PLAYED IN A POOL WITH A NET SEPARATING THE OPPOSING TEAMS IN MIDDLE. WITH EACH TEAM RECIEVING FIVE SERVES PER TEAM, TWO FAULTS PER TEAM, THREE SERVES PER PLAYER, THREE CONTACTS PER PLAY WITH THE BALL, THIS REQUIRE INNINGS LIKE BASEBALL. WHICH IN TURN DETERMINE WHO SERVES NEXT, WHEN ITS TIME TO ROTATE TO THE NEXT POSITION. WITH THAT BEING SAID THERE ARE EIGTH INNINGS, MEANING THERE ARE EIGHT POSITIONS, SEVEN RELIEFS SERVES, FIFITHTEEN PLAYERS PER TEAM. EIGHT INNINGS MAKE ONE SET, IN WHICH THE GAME IT SELF IS SCHEDULE FOR THE BEST 3 OUT OF 5 IN REGULATION, THE BEST 5 OUT OF 7 IN OVERTIME. OR THE FIRST TEAM TO WIN TWO SETS IN REGULATION OR THREE SETS IN OVERTIME. THE GAMECLOCK REGULATION IS 60:00:00 MIN AND IT RUN LIKE SOCCER TIME DURATION FULLTIME 00:00:00-60:00:00, PLAYCLOCK OVERTIME 03:00:00-00:00:00, 2ND OVERTIME 03:00:00-00:00:00, SUDDEN DEATH SWIM-OFF 00:00:00-00:00:00, FINAL O00-000 1ST 00-00 2ND 00-00 3RD 00-00 SET 0-0 0-0
0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 POSSESSION 00:00:00-00:00:00 TOTAL 54:00:00 PENALTY MIN 00:00:00-00:00:00 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.142.15.154 (talk • contribs) 
* Are you the same when you talk - shouting and never pausing for breath? Please read this moan. Oh, and kindly log in before doing any Wikipedia edits. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 10:01, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: GAME
Talk:Old Michigan City Light

message: * Merkel, Jim,(2009)  Museum a Familiar Building to Its Director Lighthouse Digest 7&6=thirteen (talk) 15:32, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Good article

message: Rowlett, Russ, Indiana Lighthouses University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill doesn't work.  But if you go to the list of lights at Rowlett, he has the page for the Indiana lights.  It's a mystery to me. 7&6=thirteen (talk) 15:36, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Rowlett, Russ Lighthouse Director link
Talk:Michigan City East Light

message: Rowlett, Russ, Indiana Lighthouses University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill doesn't work.  But if you go to the list of lights at Rowlett, he has the page for the Indiana lights.  It's a mystery to me. 7&6=thirteen (talk) 15:31, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Rowlett, Russ Lighthouse Director link
Talk:John Keells IT

message: Please suspend this article until it is given permission to be published by JKCS authorities.
:It does not appear to be a copyright violation so ther is no reason to obtain permission. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 11:31, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Embryo (film)

message: Claims that this film are in the Public Domain are not from a Reliable Source, Internet Archive, which is a website anyone can edit/upload anonymously. Until a reliable source is added, such as Film Superlist, the public domain status of this film should be treated with caution. See further discussions at Talk:List of films in the public domain in the United States. Green Cardamom (talk) 17:24, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright status
Talk:Art on the Move

message: We are the number five Art on the move group  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.147.224.224 (talk) 08:20, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Nurses (1965 TV series)

message: As this series is explicitly a continuation of the nighttime CBS TV series The Nurses (even Brooks & Marsh cover the ABC series under the summary of the CBS series), I suggest the contents of this article be merged to The Nurses (CBS TV series) (which will subsequently need to be moved, as per WP:NCTV) and then this article converted to a redirect. I am soliciting opinions and discussion on this merge proposal – if there are no objections, I will perform this merge in the near future. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 06:01, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: sounds like a good idea to me too. So, seems like there have been no objections in more than a year. Klbrain (talk) 11:48, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes – this one's still on my 'To Do' list. I just need to grab some time to carry out the merge... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 12:15, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Klbrain (talk) 09:30, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge this article to [[The Nurses (CBS TV series)]]
Talk:Our Mr. Sun

message: As this article has languished for years, I doubt it's on anybody's watchlist, but just in case... The article now qualifies for the 5x expansion in 5 days. If anybody wants a WP:DYK credit, just do a bit of clean-up in the next 3 days and you can have a DYK of your very own. Cheers. 64.40.54.127 (talk) 22:25, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: DYK

message: There were eight episodes, not nine. As far as I remember, the first four appeared on NBC. The Writer role was played by Richard Carlson in episodes 2 through 4. (He's also given credit for directing episode 4.) Episodes 5 through 8 retained Baxter, but dropped the Magic Screen format, with a distinctive format for each episode. WilliamSommerwerck (talk) 22:19, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: possible errors

message: This article is badly overwritten, with a lot of unimportant trivia. WilliamSommerwerck (talk) 22:19, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: overwritten
Talk:Theme Time Radio Hour season 2

message: I propose that the reruns from Season 1 not be included as numbered episodes in the Season 2 list, but instead as entries without numbers, perhaps with a "(rerun)" designation before them.   Seasons of television shows do not include the reruns as part of the season, nor should they be included here.
Leekil (talk) 08:39, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have updated the Halloween episode with "Rerun from season one: Halloween". If this is acceptable, I would propose we update the other two repeated episodes with the same verbage and renumber the new episodes accordingly.Davehi1 (talk) 21:11, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems good to me.Leekil (talk) 04:42, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No, repeats shouldn't be listed at all. The TTRH's episode lists are the most ridiculous, sanity-defying pages I have seen on Wikipedia in a long time. Over the next few weeks I will work on correcting this stupidity--some help would be nice.--Phrynichus (talk) 04:05, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reruns

message: A Wik article should say what it is about in the opening paragraph.  What is this?  Is it a radio show?  If so, then say it.  I came across this site trying to find out the background on a song -- and really can't tell what this is about.Kdammers (talk) 10:49, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: What is this?
Talk:Serial verb construction

message: Sorry, I can't make head or tail of this article. Did the people who wrote this article have knowledge of serial verbs, or did they just make it up themselves.
For example, serial verbs are supposed to be a syntactic phenomenon (definition at the start). But look at these:
1) Chinese:
* The Chinese example given, lǎo.hǔ yǎo-sǐ le zhāng, is a resultative verb construction.
* In the examples section, the Chinese example given is:
我(I) 坐(sit) 飞机(aircraft) 从(from) 上海(Shanghai) 到(to) 北京(Beijing) 去(travel)
These are totally different kinds of construction! What exactly is a standard "serial verb" construction in Chinese? Do the people who wrote this think that two verbs in a clause, no matter how syntactically related, are by definition "serial verbs"?
2) Japanese 
The first example given in Japanese is NOT a syntactic construction; it's a word-building construction:
With the first verb in the continuative form (連用形 ren'yōkei):
押し通る (oshi tōru) 'I'm pushing through!' in which oshi is the 'continuative' form of osu (push) and tōru (pass; get through) is the finite form whose present tense and indicative mood get read back onto oshi.
出来る (dekiru, to come out) → 出来上がる (deki-agaru, be completed)
This construction is more classical or literary and is less freely productive today. No verb arguments can come between the two verbs.
Can the writer point to sources which state that this kind of construction is known as a "serial verb" in linguistics?
Would be grateful for any kind of clarification.
Bathrobe (talk) 09:20, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Another decade one and I’m still confused. How are they different from the English examples? Come take, go see, they seem to fit the descriptions just as wel. ~elcisitiak~ (talk) 15:45, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]