Talk:Roberta Bondar

message: I've reverted the page to the 10 February 2008 version.  It looks like some vandalism went uncleaned and survived for a while.  --Prewitt81 (talk) 03:51, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Revert

message: I have done some checking of facts, and editted and added citations accordingly.  More citations are welcome, but I think the citation warning box can at least be removed.   Gierszep (talk) 02:29, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Biography & citations

message: I noticed that the Reference #2 - Biography of Roberta Bondar needs to be updated, as the current link is no longer valid.
The new link to the biography page of Dr. Bondar, from the Canadian Space Agency is http://www.asc-csa.gc.ca/eng/astronauts/biobondar.asp 
I made the change in the list of External Links, but was not able to do the same in the list of References. (I couldn't understand how to do the edit of "References" - if someone could do it, it would be appreciated. Thanks in advance. athenacgy (talk) 22:08, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  One reference needs to be updated 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Roberta Bondar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110710002641/http://www.canadaswalkoffame.com/news/press-release-canadas-walk-fame-announces-2011-inductees to http://www.canadaswalkoffame.com/news/press-release-canadas-walk-fame-announces-2011-inductees
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:25, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: So I believe the article thus far is well written with appropriate ordering of sections. The information is easy to digest, not muddled with an excess of information, and does not appear to have any bias. I would say there needs to be more citations for certain sentences, as I'm not entirely certain which source some of the information comes from, along with perhaps a few more links to other pages if those pages exist. Minor nitpicks for an otherwise decent article. 
SEB2022 (talk) 02:53, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bondar review 

message: I have done more research on Roberta Bondar and added information about her early life, education, and career as well as an external link. I also found many cases of plagiarism, so I found appropriate sources for those sentences and deleted the plagiarism and rewrote the information in a new way. Continued grammatical updates are in progress so that the article reads well and is well organized. Geboenke18 (talk) 18:58, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updates 

message: Hi all, I was assigned this article to review and edit as a class project. I added a bit more information but my job was mainly to fix grammar, formatting, organizational, and citation issues. I found quite a bit flat out copy-paste plagiarism in there so I went back in and correctly formatted and cited the information according to Wikipedia’s standards. I moved a few bits of information around to different sections so that the article would have a better flow. I added a few more readings under the ‘further reading’ header. I also added an ‘organizations’ header so I could make an organized chart of her memberships so random bits of information would not be scattered throughout the article. Alfuller18 (talk) 23:35, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update 

message: As a child in the 90s, I did >3 projects about Roberta Bondar. I thought she was really cool and she inspired me. 
Today I was watching a Star Trek and she popped into my head so I read the WP. Unfortunately the WP sounds like it is a pitch for her speaking career. 
I hope Ms. Bondar is in receipt of CPP and any other supports which she would require. I hope the same for all people. I have read in the past that she was having a hard time making ends meet. Totally predictable as a woman who is apparently untethered aka liberated. This economic structure does not incentivize women to be liberated and independent. 
All that said, this page does not seem balanced. There is not a single sentence which is not pure praise. 135.23.103.175 (talk) 03:50, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  this page sounds like a sales pitch