lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Renaissance humanism

message: According to this article
"Humanism was a pervasive cultural mode and not the program of a small elite, a program to revive the cultural legacy, literary legacy, and moral philosophy of classical antiquity. "
This sentence is not sourced and unfounded, especially considering that the rest of the article discusses primarily academic developments, which, considering the context of Renaissance Italy, was elitist and not something common people participated in. The article talks about many specific individuals who contributed to the movement, but does not discuss any widespread social changes that were a result of the movement. For this reason, I have included a citation needed tag.--Electro blob (talk) 18:55, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elite or widespread perspective? 

message: The lead section or introduction section summarizes the topic of Renaissance humanism including key points vital to the topic such as where it emerged, key contributions renaissance humanism made to the world during this time, and why it emerged. The content of the article is spread out through various sections including subsections that vary in length depending on the topic of that section. All content in the article is relevant to the articles topic and the article was last updated on December 25th, 2023 indicating recent updates. The article keeps a neutral tone simply documenting history and detailing many aspects of renaissance humanism. All information is cited with sources from reliable academic sources by a wide range of authors. All links in article work including vital links to sources. The article is well organized with clear and concise writing with no grammatical errors. All sections are well organized with subsections connecting to sections. All images add relevant information to the topic and are spread out in a visually pleasing and distinctive way. Images are well captioned and adhere to copyright rules and regulations. This article is apart of WikiProjects that discuss how perspectives of renaissance humanism are discussed in the article. In general the article is well developed, cited properly, discussed in a non biased way with easy to understand and concise language, and discusses all relevant aspects of the topic.Summerstorm10 (talk) 05:03, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Evaluation
Template talk:WikiProject Korea/old

message: :visviva (or any other template expert), can you make "Tasks you can help with" and "[Show]" closer together, inside the two margin images? maybe we can just make the third bullet something like
:"To-do list: Notice board ([show]), Discussion"
:i'm predisposed to clean, minimalist design, but that drop-down is pretty nifty, & should be as noticeable & intuitive as possible. Appleby 18:01, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I never was able to fix this issue to my satisfaction.  -- Visviva 14:17, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

message: Added field for article rating class, see Wikipedia talk:Korea for discussion and Wikipedia:Korea-related topics notice board/Assessment for the scale itself...  I'm not really sure about placement, or even if there is a good place for this in the current setup.  Thoughts?  -- Visviva 23:42, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article ratings 

message: This template for WikiProject Korea has a problem when viewed on high resolution. The margin on the right side of Gyeongbokgung picture becomes bigger on 1024+ resolution. (I am currently using 1400x1050.)
I tried to fix this problem, however couldn't figure out due to the inconsistensy of the code. I personally suggest this template to be create again from scratch with better layout and arrangement of information.129.97.245.62 05:51, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Layout Problems 

message: I wrote a replacement for the template, which is at User:YooChung/Korean.  The basic appearance and functionality is based on the current template.  It supports most of the functions that the current template provides, and I've tried to maintain interface compatibility.  Some of the improvements are:
* Fixed the show/hide button.  (The current template only works properly if there is more than one such button on a page.)
* Standard quality and importance ratings, so it doesn't matter if you write 2, 2nd-rank, or high: it will automatically turn it into high.  More importantly, sort keys for categories will be set appropriately no matter which form you write ratings in. (The current template seems to do this properly.)
* Fixed image alignment problem mentioned above.
* Easier to maintain.
A sandbox showing use of the replacement template is at User:YooChung/Sandbox.  If no problems turn up in the template, and if no one else objects, I'll replace the current template with the new one. YooChung 08:30, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Just a note that I just replaced Template:WikiProject Korea with my template since not many pages used it.  Replacement of  can be done by a redirect. YooChung 10:31, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Being bold and redirected. YooChung 08:11, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template rewrite
Talk:Aiel

message: Either the where it says that the only society to accept women is the Maidens of the Spear is incorrect, or we need to add in that the aiel fully accept gay marriage. In the first half of The Fires of Heaven, there is a bit of narrative where it specifically states that warrior societies are often as important, if not moreso, to an aiel as the sept, and often two members of the same warrior society are not allowed to marry as it would be like marrying someone from ones own family. This either says to me that the other societies are willing to accept female members, though we have never seen a female Stone Dog or Water Finder, or else the dudes in these all-male societies are happy to get themselves a real gay marriage. 24.62.27.66 01:48, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Aiel do not have gay marriage, and the Maidens of the Spear are the only society to accept women.  I believe the passage that you are talking about is the following:
It says that Maidens don't succmb to the bleakness, even though several times in the novels it says "more men and Maidens went missing every day, an not all left behind their spears."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alpha Charlie Echo (talk • contribs) 22:07, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Culture
Talk:Sunpyre

message: What is the source for this extra-dimensionality? Is it expressly stated in Alpha Flight (vol 3) #9?
: Source is the Marvel Teams Handbook 2005, as well as the Appendix to the Handbook of the Marvel Universe.DoctorWorm7 03:01, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source? 
Talk:Computer system

message: I agree, this article has flaws in even the most basic laws of grammar and, frankly, it isn't much of an article.
This article isn't going to be fixed up with any great quality any time soon and I think the best way to clean it up is to have someone proficient with the encyclopedic editing style team up with someone who is an expert on computer hardware to merge it into the Computer article.
Charlie.somerville 08:19, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: Cleanup and expert 

message: I revised it to the point where at least it's readable and understandable. It seems the author(s) of this article wanted to point out that it was possible to make a computer system even larger, and to do that make it incorporated with machinery or other computers. I understand that part, at least, but know that computer systems are not made larger with machinery, but rather just by increasing the basics, and can only control machinery. It's a system, but not a computer system.
Also, computer systems can work together, but it doesn't make a whole computer system. The only way is to get the OS to control all the computers to the point where if one is turned on not even a user can access it, but rather all comps are controlled by only one master computer. That's possible but not practical.
Besides the face lift to this article, I think it should be deleted because the article Computer is almost exactly the same as this one. I guess the only different thing is that it's the talk of a computer as a whole. I have to read more on the computer article to see if it should be deleted or merged. --Bookinvestor 19:39, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bit more clean
Talk:The Dark Side of the Rainbow

message: I have nominated this page for deletion. Please engage in a discussion here if you believe it should not be deleted.
My nomination is due to the fact that this "synchronicity" between The Dark Side of the Moon and the Wizard of Oz is demonstrably nonsense. It has been debunked and refuted by everyone involved with the Dark Side album, not least David Gilmour and Roger Waters. Because this page discusses a topic which is utterly false it has no encyclopaedic or academic interest to anyone and should be confined to fan fora and discussion boards. – Dyolf87 (talk) 10:07, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Where's the nomination? Graham Beards (talk) 12:58, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Dyolf87 used a proposed nomination template, which I removed, as I contested the deletion (per the rules: "You may remove this message if you improve the article or otherwise object to deletion for any reason"). You can see it in the page history. Popcornfud (talk) 13:31, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. Graham Beards (talk) 13:34, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nominated for deletion
Talk:Campaigns of World War II

message: I see no merit to this page as the subject is covered in detail under wars, theatres  and lists eg see :template:WWIITheatre for examples. I suggest that it is made a redirect to List of theaters and campaigns of World War II. --Philip Baird Shearer 19:35, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: There are rare instances when editing a talk page is required; this is one of them. This edit was made to avoid a double redirect. Thanks.—Chidom talk  17:51, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect

message: This section claims the term "Battle of the Atlantic" extended much further than the Atlantic, "and even involved the Arctic Ocean and Indian Ocean".</br> 
This is dubious in the extreme; Churchill coined the term to refer to the campaign against Britain's supply line, which was princpally the North Atlantic route, though the term came to encompass US operations in the Mid- and South-Atlantic areas as well. It never applied to the Arctic or the Indian naval campaigns. Unless anybody knows different, I propose to rewrite this section completely. Xyl 54 (talk) 23:28, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Battle of the Atlantic
Talk:Jean Laborde

message: Anyone know his date of birth and death?
see :de:Jean Laborde --AndreasPraefcke 22:42, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Topics
Talk:Lester Speight

message: *Speight was never a "Pro" football player.  He played College football for Morgan State University.
These are three articles in reference to that.
http://www.onnidan.com/bcsp/926/notes.htm
http://www.onnidan.com/02-03/news/january/msu0129.htm
http://espn.go.com/sportsbusiness/s/2003/0129/1500934.html
Former College player turned Actor pretty much.
I'm kinda disappointed in the (lack of) information on this page so I think I'm gonna spruce it up a bit.
TotalTommyTerror 19:48, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Dis-info

message: I'm sorry, "according to Speight" is not a reference citation.  I'll go out on a limb and say that 4.23 for a man his size is impossible.  4.3 is considered nearly superhuman.  I'm deleting this garbage. KyuzoGator 19:48, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  40-yard Time of 4.23???? 

message: Terry Tate section re-written to include two citations (there were none previously). Removed a synopsis of the character and commercials from the acting career section (for length) and added a link to the standalone Terry Tate page, where this material (and more) is well covered. Guywelch2000 (talk) 22:56, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Acting Career Clean-up 

message: Can this be correct? Did he really join the Baltimore Stars at the age of 9?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.11.16.34 (talk) 00:31, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: And the info box still is wrong so there's two diff birthdates on one page. TaoPhoenix (talk) 20:15, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

text: The Burris article in the Baltimore Sun states he was 44 in February 2007.  But does anyone have the month and day? AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:27, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year of birth
Talk:Mount Algidus

message: The prose in this article was pretty ambiguous and meandering; it needed help. Further, some of the geographical and historical information extracted from the 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica, and/or my interpretations of the confusing text, may be inaccurate. I've rewritten the text, but this article still needs a hand from someone with a more intimate knowledge of the subject matter. – Ringbang 19:56, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:Bora Horza Gobuchul

message: A couple of changes to the synopsis
I've just finished rereading this book, and I note that a couple of points in the summary aren't quite right: Horza breaks his cover with Balveda pretty shortly after he meets her on the Clear Air Turbulance, and she doesn't really leave him for dead at the end--she drags him out of the tunnels (she has to if she wants to survive, though it's an altruistic decision as well), but he croaks before she can get him any medical help. I'm going to make what I expect will be a couple of uncontroversial changes, accordingly . . . Iralith 19:58, 22 November 2005 (UTC)

message: This article almost completely consists of a description fo Phlebas, so just merge the two. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 217.235.227.193 (talk) 12:30, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Disagree a titular character can have its own article. No need to merge.MadMaxDog 05:04, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Agree; but I would trim down the synopsis - does it need to be so detailed? Seems to simply be a trawl through the novel. Early Q 23:44, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

text: Agree; The novel article can have a characters section. Stilgar27 (talk) 15:56, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

text: Agree; the entire novel is from this character's perspective - there is very little difference between the plot of the novel, and the known history of this character. Bluap (talk) 14:30, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

text: Agree; for important literary novels, or complex characters spanning multiple books, it can make sense to have an article on the character. This character just appears in one short novel, and it's a short article about him which should be confined to the novel page.Gymnophoria (talk) 15:20, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

text: Done. Created "Characters" section in Consider Phlebas and moved it along with the page for Perosteck.Smith(talk) 20:30, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Phlebas
Talk:Paddy Keenan

message: I am not sure of the actual date of release, but 'Doublin' with Glackin was made a long time before 2002.
You're right. It was 1978.
http://www.irishmusicreview.com/disctara.htm
Ogg 19:20, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Sentence in : A solo career 
"Paddy's first (and eponymous) solo album appeared in 1975 and he also duetted with fiddler Paddy Glackin on the 1978 Tara album "Doublin'". He subsequently recorded a second solo album for Gael Linn, "Poirt An Phiobaire", in 1983."
Which Tara is this referring to??  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Redtigerxyz (talk • contribs) 17:17, August 27, 2007 (UTC) 
The record label "Tara Music" doesn't have an article within wikipedia. Someone has put square brackets around the word "Tara", just for the hell of it anyway. Here is their website:
http://www.taramusic.com/audio.htm Ogg 11:55, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tara 

message: The whole section 'The dustbin and the Beatles' is completely outrageous, trivial and unverifiable. Can we just delete it? --MatthewLiberal 18:30, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Problems
Talk:Vålerenga Fotball

message: The following link is provided, so that the discussion stays in one place:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Transfer_(association_football)#The_Gunnarsson_transfer_.E2.80.94_seperate_article_or_redirect--85.166.141.237 (talk) 15:47, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Gunnarsson transfer — seperate article or redirect 
Talk:Fading Suns

message: I'm troubled by the presumption that 'Theurge' as described in the books falls into the same category as 'psionics' in this write up.
As the system differentiates between the two with separate mechanics, as well as theurgy occupying a different social standing, I think it would be better to structure the article such that occult phenonmenon have its own paragraph, with mention being made of theurges being divinely inspired sorcery in some fashion, and psionics being more stereotypical science fiction fare.
-Lextius
Aliens and Devilties has a passage that discusses this and states that theurgy and psionics actually being the same thing is a quite popular opinion, even though the church disapproves of it.
PrinzMegahertz (talk) 18:48, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Theurge

message: I have updated a few details (ISBN numbers and name of the author of the Dead End shard).
Perhaps this article should be re-done and expanded? It could easilly be upgraded from Low Importance.
-Vithar  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vithar Alderland (talk • contribs) 09:16, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Updates
Talk:Dimerization (chemistry)

message: This page needs some type of reference, added tag.--FloNight 20:30, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference

message: The stub templates at the bottom make this article really cluttered.  I think we might want to do something about it.  --Ruff Bark away!
first paragraph says covalent bonds.....second paragraph says no covalent bonds.   clarify please.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.122.62.231 (talk) 18:31, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clutter 

message: The page needs a discussion of this topic  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.198.202.35 (talk) 10:35, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dimer Graphs and Statistical Mechanical Dimers 

message: "A dimer .. is an oligomer consisting of two monomers" . . uh, except when it isn’t.  The article is written from a polymer-chemistry standpoint - where focus is typically on degree of polymerisation.  But diatomic gases, for a familiar example, are spoken of as dimeric.  And in the world of, eg, UV lasers, the excited / excitation dimers central to excimer technology are diatomic species.  Both standpoints are valid; and I’d think there are likely to be others.
Can anyone add to the article accordingly?
- SquisherDa (talk) 22:59, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:   Wider usage of the term!  

message: — Assignment last updated by Tiff592 (talk) 00:21, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: CHEM 300

message: Slightly tortuous vocabulary theme: IUPAC defines "dimerization" but not "dimer".    Diborane is often described as a dimer, but the monomer basically does not exist as far as I can tell.  We can agree that borane will dimerize, but it seems deceptive to describe diborane as a dimer of an extremely elusive species. We do not describe ethane as a dimer, although the Gold Book describes the dimerization of methyl radicals. Bottom line: our article dimer probably should be written on "dimerization", which is better defined.--Smokefoot (talk) 14:00, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Dimers
Template talk:Wu-Tang Clan

message: Ghostface Killah is just Ghostface. His new album cover (http://www.umusic.dk/MCM/covers/cover_Ghostface_PrettyToney.jpg) says just Ghostface, his label Def Jam Recordings (http://www6.defjam.com/site/artist.php?artist_id=485) says Ghostface, MTV (http://www.mtv.com/bands/az/ghostface_killah/artist.jhtml) too (even if the url still includes Killah).
:Believe it or not, the name Ghostface is actually a shortened version of the name Ghostface Killah.  You see how he removed the second word?   It's not like he changed his name; and even if you change your name completely, it's no guarantee your Wikipedia article is going to get that name...see Cat Stevens.   There are few people out there who only know Ghostface as Ghostface and don't know the full name of Ghostface Killah, and there is noone out there who is going to get confused by this template saying Ghostface Killah instead of simply Ghostface.  For the sake of brevity, the name change of his article might be worthy but the full name should stay at the top of his article and stay in this template.  --Jamieli 20:45, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, fair enough, including Killah in the article text wont cause confusion. I'll see if I can find something about his name change later and maybe add a paragraph about it in the article. I'm guessing it might have something to do with not using the word "Killer" when he's going more MTV-mainstream.--Jacob no. 9 18:37, 23 November 2005 (UTC)

message: There is now an article for Ghost Dog: The Way of the Samurai (soundtrack). Would it be appropriate to add it to the template? -Wisekwai 04:05, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ghost Dog: The Way of the Samurai 

message: Disciples of the 36 Chambers, Wu-Tang Chamber Music and Legendary Weapons aren't studio Wu-Tang albums. They're live and compilation albums Tashi Talk to me 14:42, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some of these albums aren't Wu-Tang's
Talk:Get-rich-quick schemes

message: The tone of this stub seems negative, mainly toward the end. Stating that something is fraud is not acceptable per WP:NPOV. Please edit it accordingly. PJM 20:42, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, let's get serious about following Wikipedia's article writing policies. What you say is generally true, but an encyclopedic article must offer both sides of the story - as silly as that might seem. Thanks. PJM 21:20, 22 November 2005 (UTC)

text: Yes, I agree, it definitely scrapes WP:NOR and the writing is poor. PJM 22:13, 22 November 2005 (UTC)

text: Because it expresses via opinion that specific persons and organizations are fraudulent it's an attack article, and that makes it speediable. PJM 01:46, 23 November 2005 (UTC)

text: Ok, I agree. Superclear 01:54, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Note to author regarding POV
Talk:Tobacco BY-2 cells

message: Done, makes sense, even without discusssion here. -- Kim van der Linde at venus 22:32, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Result:moved

message: Anybody got a nice picture of one of these guys? --Frozenport (talk) 19:42, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can we have a picture?
Talk:Lola Rodríguez de Tió

message: It is actually Tió, not Tío.
Hey Amigo, how you doing?  According to the majority of the websites, her last name contains the accent on the "i" and not the "o".  Here are the sites .  Note that even the school named after her has the accent is on the "o". (Probably the sign maker flunked in History! Demf 14:19, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually the correct name is Tió with an accent on the o. Joelito 03:51, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: According to Castillian language accentuation rules, it cannot be TIÓ but TIO, like dio (she gave) or fue (she went, she was), so if it's TIO it's like that and if not it's TÍO to separate the diphthong. You can find texts with fué* or dió*, but that's not correct nowadaysGaudio 11:34, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree... since Tió (her last name... or more accurately, her husband's) is Catalan, not Castillian! Demf 14:15, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Her last name 

message: I corrected accent and moved article title to reflect this.--Lawrlafo (talk) 04:46, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Corrected accent on last name