lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Kelvin Gosnell

message: In his autobiography, pages 100-105, Steve MacManus says it was 1979 when he replaced Kelvin Gosnell as editor of 2000AD, not 1978. He had previously been chief sub-editor, which is why the Barney website lists MacManus as on the editorial staff earlier than that. Richard75 (talk) 16:49, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Kev Walker

message: Does anyone know if Walker has a website? 24.62.231.208 (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 15:09, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Not that I've found. (Emperor (talk) 03:31, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Website

message: Kev Walker has done some artwork for the vampirates book series, whether for the covers or for the website i dont know, but he is credited at the bottom of the page. http://www.vampirates.co.uk/events/ - Random Cool Guy  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.164.146.152 (talk) 18:44, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vampirates Series 
Talk:Justin D. Edwards

message: I have nominated this article for NPOV check as it appears to have been written by its subject. Stifle 20:07, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I am removing the Prod tag for the following reasons:
* Multiple independent reviews of his work back up the textual assertions
* Has made contributions to two distinct areas, ie, travel and gothic literature as well as combinations of the two, ie, editor of "Other routes"
* Full professorship at a European University is prestigious, unlike  "professorship" at an American university which all lecturers gain just by virtue of lecturing.
* He is a fellow of a Cambridge college.
Ansell 23:40, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of Prod reasons 

message: I am removing the unreferenced tag as per the references to reviews of his works. Will get a bio outline for his achievements soon, but that alone does not deserve an unreferenced tag on the page. Ansell 23:41, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of unreferenced tag 
Talk:Bill Bolling

message: "Leslie Byrne is considered by many Virginia political insiders to be the most liberal candidate to ever run statewide in Virginia."
That sounds like something from a republican attack ad, not an unbiased evaluation.
```` Brian Courter
:Agreed, so removing. - Ta bu shi da yu 08:08, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A new user, MatthewTBolling, just made major changes to the article. He appears to be the subject's son. Editors should take note. Rklear (talk) 15:44, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI tag added 
Talk:Laurel wreath

message: The symbolism of the laurel wreath originated in Greek mythology.  Apollo, god of the sun, and Eros, son of Aphrodite, got into a dispute.  Apollo told Eros that he should not meddle with bows and arrows, leaving such crafts to himself, a true master in warlike weapons.  At Apollo's presumptuous words, Eros retorted, "Your arrows shall strike all things else, Apollo, but mine shall strike you."  With this, the son of Aphrodite took his bow and two arrows: one made of gold and the other tipped with lead.  With the arrow of gold, made to excite love in its target, he struck Apollo.  With the other arrow, lead-tipped arrow to make its victim repel love, he pierced the nymph Daphne, daughter of the river god Peneus.  Apollo immediately fell blindly in love with Daphne and began to pursue her.  Daphne, repelled by the sight of Apollo, ran from him. Apollo chased her through the woods, but Daphne was a nymph of Artemis, goddess of the hunt, and was able to outrun Apollo for a time.  But soon, she grew tired and weak and her pursuer came closer to his quarry.  She called desperately to her father as she passed a running stream.  "Help me, Peneus! Open the earth to enclose me, or change my form, which has brought me into this danger!"  As soon as the words left her lips, her hair became leaves, her limbs grew into branches, her skin transformed to bark and her legs became the trunk of a tree, her feet grew into the ground as roots.  Apollo saw this and was amazed.  Daphne was still beautiful, though she had transformed into a laurel tree.  Apollo kissed the bark of the tree and vowed to have her always, though she could not be his wife.  He promised to exalt her memory by wearing her always as a crown and adorning the heads of victorious warriors and athletes with her branches that would remain green forever and never decay.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by LAleshire (talk • contribs) 19:19, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for that. Now add it to the article, it's a crucial element!Lobsterthermidor (talk) 10:37, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Origin of the Laurel Wreath in Mythology 
Talk:Kings County Savings Bank

message: This page has quite a few repetitions, especially "by the wealth for the wealth."  It can be pared down.  Hypeer 20:27, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: arent the dates in the wrogn order?--Applegigs (talk) 07:23, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: question
Talk:Bishop Grosseteste University

message: I'll add some more material about the history of the college to this article in the next week. I'll also look at some other articles for UK colleges/universities and see what else needs to be added. 
Politepunk 20:30, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled

message: There is nothing in this article to identify where the institution ranks in league tables.   Perhaps there should be an indication?  FreeFlow99 (talk) 16:27, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  League tables
Talk:Siege of Compiègne

message: "Jean de Luxembourg", though of the Luxembourg family, was Count of Ligny, rather than Luxembourg. The sources I've seen generally call the Bâtard de Vendôme "Jean" rather than "Lionel" and make him the son of Louis, Count of Vendôme and an Englishwoman named Sybille Boston. Comments? Choess 01:27, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: My sources are listed and footnoted.  What are your sources? Durova 23:08, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Characters in the capture 

message: What is meant by: "The French rear guard that remained outside had no alternative to capture." Probably something else is meant. Something like: The French rear guard that remained outside had no alternative than to surrender. Wereldburger758 (talk) 05:46, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually the word "capture" there is a noun not a verb, so perfectly meaning what is supposed to meant (no alternative to the capture, fact of being captured)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.66.196.163 (talk) 05:06, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  The meaning of a sentence
Talk:John Sarbanes

message: article gives basic encylopedic info, needs expansion in biography and legisaltive career. Marylandstater 15:51, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I noticed a couple out of date pieces including committee assignments, caucus memberships etc. and have some other suggested edits: 
*Update headshot to the most current headshot: https://sarbanes.house.gov/sites/sarbanes.house.gov/files/images/2013-high-res.jpg. Here's a link to verify that is the most current headshot: http://bioguide.congress.gov/scripts/biodisplay.pl?index=S001168
*Update committee assignments: https://sarbanes.house.gov/about/committee-assignments. No longer a member of the National Resources Committee and is on the Energy and Power Subcommittee. Link to Energy & Commerce Committee site: http://energycommerce.house.gov/about/membership. Link to Subcommittee on Energy & Power site: http://energycommerce.house.gov/subcommittees/energy-and-power. Link to Subcommittee on Health site: http://energycommerce.house.gov/subcommittees/health
*Update caucus membership. No longer the co-chair of the Public Service Caucus (https://sarbanes.house.gov/issues/good-government) and he is a member of the Congressional Hellenic Israel Alliance (http://www.greeknewsonline.com/congressional-hellenic-and-israeli-alliance-marks-second-anniversary/)
*The congressman’s signature piece of legislation (the Government by the People Act) is currently not mentioned. Could devote a new section to the bill which is co-sponsored by 150 members of Congress and over 40 organizations. More info: http://ofby.us/about-the-bill/ and https://sarbanes.house.gov/bythepeople 
*Lastly, The “Campaign Finance” section needs updates with recent information. Could be worth acknowledging that the congressman no longer takes PAC money. Also, since the Congressman’s signature piece of legislation is aimed at reforming the way campaigns are funded, the title “campaign finance” might lead some readers into thinking it is a section about his work on campaign finance issues. I might recommend calling it “Political Fundraising”. 
Hope this helps. I work for an organization that supports the Congressman's signature piece of legislation. Feel free to let me know if you have any questions. LauraFriedy (talk) 21:38, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Updates for headshot, committee assignments, caucus memberships, and more
Template talk:ESPN

message: I modified the color of the bars to make the text more readable.  --myselfalso 20:34, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

message: User 99.236.63.51 is insisting that ESPN own's a piece of CTV's other specialty channels in Canada, including the Canadianised versions of The Discovery Channel and Viewer's Choice. I tried reaching him through the talk page, asking for the source of that information, but he refused to do so. I thought ESPN's involvement in Canada was limited to TSN, RDS and other sports channels, not any channel that they don't have anything to do with in the states, such as Discovery. If anyone has any proof, please post an URL here -- I do not want to start another edit war. -- azumanga (talk) 16:10, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: ESPN's ownership in other CTV channels

message: This template is a bear. It has several layers of collapsing and many of the bottom nodes are quite small. --William Graham talk 21:35, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Structure 

message: should also include NEXT Athlete and The Body Issue as part of other properties or Miscellaneous. still actively used by espn 97.126.116.154 (talk) 03:04, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please make your requested changes to the template's sandbox first; see WP:TESTCASES. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 10:26, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 8 August 2021
Talk:Marge

message: Is Aunt Marge sufficiently important to be on this disambiguation page?  She's not a particularly important Harry Potter character, and she doesn't have her own article.  Nicolasdz 20:36, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Given the level of importance and relevance this article exudes, I'd say it's appropriate--vital, even--that we list here every pie and cookie ever baked by anyone who for any period of time was referred to as "Marge". -Eric (talk) 18:53, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Patty Jo Watson

message: Thank you for notifying me of the decision to mark the article on Patty Jo Watson for speedy deletion.
I believe Dr. Watson qualifies as a fit encyclopedic subject. She is credited with the "defining and pioneering" the field of ethnoarchaeology, which subject already rates an article on Wikipedia (See Patty Jo Watson--An Intellectual Biography from the University of Texas, recently added to the article under external links.) She introduced several innovations into the field of archaeology, including the practice of performing recreations/reenactments of ancient lifeways as a method of filling in gaps from incomplete archaeological data: these experiements commenced in the 1960s in Mammoth Cave with modern explorers adopting dress and tools similar to those recovered from archaeological remains in the cave. Her analysis of paleofecal specimens, including the development of physical methods for separating materials from such specimens, enables (using carbon dating) the creation of timelines for transitions between hunter-gatherer culture and plant domestication in the Late Archaic and Early Woodland cultures.
A fairly prolific academic author as well as the author of a few books for the scientific press, Watson is the recipient of numerous awards and other recognition. At least one archaeological symposium has been organized in her honor, with the resulting papers published under her editorship.
I believe, based on these facts, that Watson satisfies one or more of the listed criteria for importance and significance, namely:
* Published authors, editors, and photographers who have written books with an audience of 5,000 or more or in periodicals with a circulation of 5,000 or more
* Painters, sculptors, architects, engineers, and other professionals whose work is recognized as exceptional and likely to become a part of the enduring historical record of that field
* The professor test -- If the individual is more well known and more published than an average college professor (based on the U.S. practice of calling all full-time academics professors), they can and should be included.
Alan Canon 20:38, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks to me that she is notable indeed. I have removed the speedy tag, but I invite you to move the second paragraph (beside its first sentence) of what you wrote above to the article itself. - Liberatore(T) 20:42, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Contesting of Speedy Deletion
Talk:A Boy Named Charlie Brown (1963 film)

message: The Imdb says that this film was released in 1965. Is this right? --Elil 6 March 2006 (UTC)
:The Schulz museum states the existence of a "Never aired 1963 documentary about Charles Schulz. Produced and directed by Lee Mendelson (30 minutes)".  However, the article states it did air on CBS.  Curiouser and curiouser. Hiding  talk 21:07, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Official Vince Guaraldi website confirms that the documentary never aired. Don't believe everything you read on Wikipedia. H Bruthzoo 19:26, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: From WP:RM:
*:A Boy Named Charlie Brown (1963 film) → :A Boy Named Charlie Brown (1965 film) — The film date over at IMDB says it's 1965 not 1963. Not to be confused with an animated feature of the same name —- Time Immemorial 17:03, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move request
Talk:Cardcaptor Sakura media information

message: I think I'll have a look over this article in addition to the main CCS article.  There's some information here that could be brought back to the main article and vice versa.  Mainly info on the English adaptation, since it's a major part of CCS media.  The rest of it can be referenced here.
So there'll be some cropping and revising and moving going on.  I'll see if I can figure out what's best. --Crisu 20:48, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updates 

message: Does the article need some cleanup?
Samantha Lim88 01:35, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup?
Talk:Battle of Ko Chang

message: I added many fact claimed by Royal Thai Navy. Some are not match with france history.
Analayo 04:13, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Thai history

message: Is it just me or is this article written from French POV?  --  Adeptitus 22:37, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV? 

message: Satahib seems should be Sattahip - at the southern tip of Chonburi Province. 
Mori Riyo (talk) 09:21, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Place name 

message: The article was created based on information from the French perspective, which contained the mistaken inclusion of the Sri Ayudhya and an extra torpedo boat in the battle. Most English-language sources repeat this mistake, in effect over-emphasising the French victory as they were (incorrectly) regarded as very outnumbered. Some of these details had been corrected, but most of the text hadn't been modified accordingly, and none of the article body is cited to a reliable source. The article needs to be thoroughly reworked to present facts from both sides as well as the discrepancies. It should also discuss the resulting differing analyses, with Western sources describing it as a decisive French victory, while Thai sources insist that the French failed to strategically achieve what they set out to. --Paul_012 (talk) 15:07, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major revision needed
Talk:John Drew MacKenzie

message: This article most certainly doesn't meet the criteria for speedy deletion under A7. It asserts its notability in the very first sentence. I'm not saying it shouldn't be nominated for AfD, but it's nowhere near enough of a slam-dunk for speedying, given the Newlyn Copper page. --Sneftel 20:52, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  A7
Talk:The Stoppables

message: Mrs. Stoppable is Jewish.  How do we know this? Ron is Jewish. If she wasn't, he wouldn't be, unless he converted, and he doesn't seem to have done so.  Being bold, removing 'believe to be Jewish' from Mrs. S. - Ipstenu 20:53, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Although I'm not an expert regarding the Jewish religion, I'm pretty sure that a child’s religion does not require that both parents’ religions to be the same. In Kim Possible, Mrs. Stoppable’s religion has not been directly addressed, thus conclusions cannot not be properly drawn.  =D  Jumping cheese 00:13, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  No, but for a person to be born Jewish, their mother must be jewish. Hence my argument :)  I feel it's the simplist solution to the question, based on the limited information we have. Check out Who is a Jew? -- Ipstenu 17:02, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I hereby stand corrected! =) Jumping cheese 01:32, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Anne Braden

message: I will finish this article this evening, complete with citations, sources, etc. --Jamiem 3/6/06
More to come. -- Jamiem 17:46, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Since this article has been edited substantially between 2006 (when the previous talk page comments were added) and now, I've cleaned up the talk page and assessed the article as C-class. ---Shane Landrum (cliotropic | talk | contribs) 17:42, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Talk page cleanup

message: After seeing that the finding aid for the Braden Papers contains several low-res images of her, I've started the process of trying to secure either a public-domain or Creative-Commons-licensed image. I'll follow up here when I know more. ---Shane Landrum (cliotropic | talk | contribs) 18:17, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Securing an image of Braden
Talk:Heine–Cantor theorem

message: "See also" section does not introduce any new information. I suggest to delete it.
:I agree, and have deleted it now. Akvilas (talk) 16:20, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delete "See also" section 

message: As the proof is by contradiction (rather than by passing to the contrapositive), it is not constructive.  It may be worth pointing this out in the article itself.  Katzmik (talk) 11:31, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, it is possible to give a proof that is not a proof by contradiction. See . I thought this one is more standard. (In fact, it appears in Rudin, if I remember correctly.) -- Taku (talk) 13:14, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The proof of the existence of a finite subcover used here is surely non-constructive.  I would be surprised if there exists a constructive proof for this theorem.  There may be deep reasons for this. Katzmik (talk) 14:12, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The theorem is most definitely nonconstructive. I don't recall the exact argument, but it implies something which is considered false in the constructive setting. This is also the reason why Bishop in his constructive analysis defines continuous real functions by what would normally be read as "continuous, and uniformly continuous on each bounded interval". — Emil J. 14:13, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-constructive 

message: One should be careful selecting the subsequences guaranteed by the compactess. In order to make them both converging to the same point one should first choose a subsequence of the x_n's and then a subsequence of the y_{n_k} with the same indices so one can use that d(x_n,y_n)<1/n. Maybe this should be pointed out in the proof.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.49.224.88 (talk) 13:48, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Choosing the subsequences
Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/hakozen

message: FWIW, I fear that user Hakozen's poor English skills and insistence that this is a matter of Armenian treachery mean that this will probably not be a fruitful RfC. CRCulver 20:58, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

message: I don't agree with Hakozen going in and making the unilateral edits he is making. It is my understanding that Wikipedia is all about consensus and continuously trying to edit Turks into the page seems fruitless. But on another level I think maybe Hakozen is having language issues. His English doesn't seem very good. Maybe one way to rectify this issue is to expand the article itself. It doesn't discuss very well the current theories as to the identity of the Huns. Stacey Doljack Borsody 21:06, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  My comment from Talk:Huns
Talk:1st Battalion 22d Infantry

message: This article is a duplicate of information contained on 1st Battalion, 22nd Infantry Regiment on the 22nd Infantry Regiment page. It whould be folded into that page and deleted. SSG Cornelius Seon (Retired) 21:06, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *Agreed, I added the tag, now if I only remember to ever get back to it...Nobunaga24 07:11, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:Featured article removal candidates/This Charming Man

message: **Do not list articles that have recently been promoted—such complaints should have been brought up during the candidacy period. - This article was made featured around a month ago. Please read the FARC guidelines before listing an article. exolon 17:57, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I am not aware of such a rule (official or unofficial) and been so bold as to stet the nomination.  If the problems are not serious, the vote will be to "keep" anyway. -- ALoan (Talk) 16:42, 6 March 2006 (UTC)