lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Big King

message: I think the wiki linked term "Burger King" needs to be used very early in the lede. Instead it gets an unlinked passing mention in the final sentence. I am not familiar with this product, so I'm not sure if there is a good reason why this is so. Atlas-maker (talk) 05:10, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Burger King

message: The references to the Justia links in the Notes are all "broken". Not sure why they are there. I have included a link to the USPTO live TSDR reference for the cancelled registration of BIG KING. I have deleted the mention of the completely unrelated registration for "frozen confections". BK's registration was NOT "assigned" to anyone. The reason for cancellation of the US registration was administrative, i.e., failure to file Section 8 declaration of continued use. Lupinelawyer (talk) 18:26, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: US Trademark Issues

message: The middle roll is missing in Germany too and probably in more European countries. That's kind of unfair. Is it because it would look too much like a Big Mac? --2001:16B8:2E8A:9400:D895:D82E:A3CF:C246 (talk) 19:41, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Middle roll
Talk:Frank Lovejoy

message: The filmography neglects to list Frank Lovejoy's last and in some ways best-known film "Shack Out on 101," a cult favorite from Republic Pictures in 1961, the year before he died. He has TOP BILLING in the film along with Terry Moore, in a cast that also includes Whit Bissell and Lee Marvin. That seems like a glaring omission to me... Billcito (talk) 19:51, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Filmography
Talk:BK Chicken Fries

message: is the official name "BK" chicken fries?  not "Burger King chicken fries" or just "chicken fries"?  -KaJunl (talk) 01:16, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The name is BK Chicken Fries, per the trademarks used on Burger King's web page. --Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 02:28, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  Can you provide a link? Burger King used that name during the original LTO release, but doesn't seem to have used it since the 2015 re-release (plus, even if it is used buried in some legalese, the fact that a majority of their website, their menu boards, and the product packaging don't use "BK" in the name should count under WP:COMMONNAME). —Ahecht (TALKPAGE) 17:37, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  product name 

message: Since the product's reintroduction a number of LTO variations have come out (fiery, jalapeno, Cheetos, Buffalo, Rings, etc). Should a section be added regarding these variations?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2620:160:E308:0:0:0:0:D (talk) 00:50, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Product Variations
Talk:Frank Hawks

message: The article seems to be devoted to mainly expansive quotes. I propose to rewrite it entirely. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 00:26, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: New rewrite

message: The editor involved please explain changes. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 21:48, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Campaign to remove images?
Talk:Frank Moore (journalist)

message: I am in possession of a First Edition book by Frank Moore entitled "The Civil War in Song and Story, 1860 - 1865, collected and arranged by Frank Moore, Published by P.F. Collier in 1889. This book has been in my family since the 1890's. Is this a rare book? Any Idea of value?
EdwinMooreIV (talk) 04:11, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional Work by Frank Moore
Talk:Pandal

message: OK you need to clarify if this term applies only to certain structures in certain religions, or if it is a general term to describe a temporary structure erected in ANY religion. 
For example, would a sukkah (in Judaism) be called a "pandal"? I'm guessing not. But the current article doesnt make that clear  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.231.216.169 (talk) 11:37, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

message: Does the Malay word pondok come from pandal? The English equivalent of the Pondok article is Hut, but though hut is a synonym, it doesn't have quite the same context or shades of meaning as the Malay word. Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:24, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Pondok
Talk:Frank Moore Colby

message: ...gave him a reference in 1978: http://www.gocomics.com/peanuts/1978/11/05  A2Kafir (and...?) 03:58, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Peanuts"... 
Talk:People's Square

message: You could theoretically gloss the Chinese name as "the People's Square", just like you could theoretically gloss it as "the Expansive Field of the Chinese People", but absolutely no one does. It's simply "People's Square" or untranslated "Renmin Guangchang". — LlywelynII 04:57, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Burger King Specialty Sandwiches

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Burger King Specialty Sandwiches/GA2 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at  until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Regards, SONIC678 01:47, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Burger King Specialty Sandwiches/GA2" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Burger King Specialty Sandwiches/GA1 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at  until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Regards, SONIC678 01:47, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Burger King Specialty Sandwiches/GA1" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders: Making the Team

message: Why is she omitted from Season 5? 98.172.252.194 (talk) 20:37, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meagan Flaherty 

message: I propose spinning-off the Episodes and Cast sections into their own pages.Thecleanerand (talk) 16:39, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spin-off sections
Talk:Frank O'Connor

message: A conflict of interest on this subject (being a family member) prevents me from making direct edits. I have instead put up an external page of collected works which updates previous bibliographical works. The page contains items from printed and online sources (all referenced). I hope Wikipedia editors looking to see a more complete bibliography available online will find the material useful. It's available at http://www.enhaut.ca/projects/foc/biblio.html 2019-07-24 Osod (talk)
I have commenced a tidy-up of the Bibliography section using cite templates. Capitalization and punctuation follow standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, as much as Wikipedia templates allow it. ISBNs and other persistent identifiers, where available, are commented out, but still available for reference. Feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 05:40, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography 
Talk:Dallas Roberts

message: Is it just me but he looks so much like John Ritter, he could play his life story in a movie!
It's not just you, I swear he's John's brother or some relative...
Micheline
Saw him on The Good Wife  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.13.179.8 (talk) 19:56, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dallas Roberts
Talk:TenderGrill

message: Please stop making this edit - it is factually incorrect. The source you cite does not state that there was a chopped patty used for any of Burger King's grilled chicken sandwiches. As a 20+ year employee and manager of a BK franchise, I can tell you that at no time has the grilled chicken sandwich used a chopped patty. It has always used and currently still uses a whole muscle piece of chicken breast that includes some of the rib meat. The only thing that has changed is the portion size of the patty and the seasoning used.
If you read the current ingredient list for the TenderGrill sandwich, you will find that the first ingredient reads white meat chicken with rib meat - just like the source you quoted. Every thing that is past that is the seasoning and marinade used to flavor the product.
Jeremy (Jerem43 01:47, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: User:Arsene recent edits
Talk:Dallas Texas Temple

message: It's hard to tell from the picture, but it looks quite unique and interesting, possibly with some Ptolemaic influence.  Since I can't find anything on the website, perhaps someone involved with the Dallas Temple at a local level could fill in this and some other details?  Mormon temples are among America's most precious architectural treasures.  PenitentWhaler (talk) 13:17, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Architectural style?
Template talk:Taxobox/Archive 9

message: Could someone take a look at Ross's Gull and confirm that I have used statusref correctly? There appears to be a problem, hence my question - while the ref has been inserted in the correct place in the references list, there is no inline note linking to it - I would expect to see one, probably just after the status. Thanks SP-KP 19:31, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You were so very close... "status_ref" not "statusref". - UtherSRG (talk) 20:08, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Query regarding the statusref attribute
Talk:Frank Pick

message: Are there any extant images of Pick? They should be, if not PD, at least useable under a fair use rationale. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:38, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: There are quite a few on the London Transport Museum website (via link at bottom of article), but it is not clear that any of them have been published until recently, so PD cannot be assumed. I haven't looked into fair-use criteria, so don't know such an argument would be appropriate.--DavidCane (talk) 23:13, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

text: *As he has been decease awhile, fair use should be acceptable for one image. Compare Chrisye, for example. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:17, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

text: **I'll have a look at what's available and put one up.--DavidCane (talk) 01:15, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

text: ***I have uploaded and added :File:Frank Pick, 1939.jpg to the article.--DavidCane (talk) 01:41, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

text: ****That looks great, thanks. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:46, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: I came across this while browsing Amazon for something slightly different. Might be useful, and should probably at least be noted for the article to stay comprehensive:
*
—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:42, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  New(ish) book
Talk:Frank Soo

message: I know it's generally acknowledged on the internet that he is the first non-white player to play for England. The fact is that these were 'unofficial' England matches. As such, i don't think his 9 caps for England should be included in his infobox as it's confusing and Wikipedia should be accurate. You'll find no record of him in List of England international footballers (alphabetical) or on England Stats. At the very least a note stating these were "unofficial"? extraordinary (talk) 09:12, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Played for England 

message: He played as a guest in three wartime games for Reading. This is shown on the website"1871 the ultimate Reading F.C. website in the "where are they now" section.
I have attempted to include this in his career record but seem to have made a complete pigs ear of it.
Can you please put this right and tell me how to make such a change correctly?
Ericsback (talk) 13:37, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Pigs ear now fixed! ;-) extraordinary (talk) 13:28, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

text: Oh sorry, and also how to fix it. It's not the easiest thing to figure out that infobox. Check out Template:Infobox_Football_biography_2 for more information. Essentially for the different clubs you have 'years', 'clubs' and 'caps(goals)' in this (Frank Soo) example. You'll notice in the code that these also have numbers after them, ie. years1, clubs1. So the second club a player plays for would be 2 and the third one 3 and so on. In this example i've put Reading in as club number 6. As a result you then have to knock up the numbers of all the following clubs he played for.Sorry if i've explained that really badly!! I find just having a good look at the code and seeing how it relates to the final table tends to help me. extraordinary (talk) 13:37, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Three appearances for Reading

message: Are there reallyno pics of him? can someone add one.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.191.186.136 (talk) 05:10, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  pics 
Talk:Frank Sugg

message: '''
                                         my mother                                                              
                my mother name is nutan. she is 40 yars old. she is fari and short.
                she hes long hair. she is hard working and helping. she gets up in 
                the morning. she cooks food. she take care of me. she helps me in my
                studies. she teaches me values and manners. she is the backbone of 
                the house. I love her lot  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.148.38.1 (talk) 09:37, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Frank Swettenham

message: There is no mention in H.S. Barlow's biography of Swettenham having been Catholic, as the current Wikipedia entry states. Given his general background (in terms of the schools he attended and so forth), it seems more likely that his background was Anglican, but I can find no definite confirmation of this. I wonder if anyone else has more information?
Laughing sandbags (talk) 14:09, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Religious background 
Talk:DataTreasury

message: An anonymous editor added important, but potentially defamatory information about Keith De Lucia to the article.  The information might be acceptable if scrutinized to remove POV and properly referenced.--Nowa (talk) 14:23, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Keith De Lucia 

message: Is The Politico a reliable source?  No other source attests to the fact that Keith DeLucia and Keith Wickey are the same person or that Keith Wickey had been convicted of armed robbery.--Nowa (talk) 01:42, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have modified the article to better reflect the situation (for now), although this does not address the reliability of The Politico... --Edcolins (talk) 09:11, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I see no reason to doubt the Politico and it looks to be a good article in that publication written by someone with a good background. However, this article on Wikipedia doesn't even come close to being NPOV, in my view and looks to be just an attempt to tarnish the reputation of the DataTreasury people. I'll try some edits, using Politico as a source for all sides. GDallimore (Talk) 13:38, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: The Politico

message: We have a conflict over OR vs notability.  The question is, should this article mention that the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas is a preferred court in the US to bring patent infringement law suits due to its "rocket docket"?  I feel that it is since it supports why it is notable.  Other editors disagree since there are no references which support the assertion that DataTreasury filed its lawsuits in this court because it was a preferred court.  They view it as original research.  I don't have strong feelings one way or the other, but would appreciate other editors weighing in on proper Wikipedia policy.--Nowa (talk) 11:55, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure why notability is an issue. Information in an article doesn't need to be notable, provided it's more than just trivia. Only the topic of the article needs to be notable. So the only issue left is that of original synthesis of two separate pieces information in the article. Saying that the Texas court is noted to be patent friendly and a rocket docket implies that that was why the suit was filed there and that implication needs to be avoided unless basked up by a reliable source, partcularly when the more likely explanation is that the company just filed suit in a geographically convenient court.  GDallimore (Talk) 15:29, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Eastern District of Texas
Talk:Frank V. Dudley

message: A resource concerning Frank Dudley is "The Indiana Dunes Revealed - The Art of Frank V. Dudley" - Brauer Museum of Art - Valparaiso University". Edited by James R. Dabbert.
(Published by U of I Press Urbana & Chicago 2006).
It contains many images of Dudley's dunes paintings as well as a history of how Dudley's work ties into the early environmental activists who helped preserve a portion of the Dunes into what is now a national park. (Heavy industry took portions of the dunes also...possibly without some activism...no portion of the Dunes would have been saved.)
Frank Dudley spent about 50 years living at least part time on the Dunes and painted many pictures of them.
The Brauer Museum staff at Valparaiso University might be able to help develop this worthy article further. They also have held one or more Dudley exhibits which were highly regarded.Lindisfarnelibrary (talk) 23:49, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hoping someone can expand this article and add appropriate images
Talk:PHP accelerator

message: I've never heard of "NuSphere," and I do plenty of work with PHP and opcode optimizers.   apparently added it at the top, and I can only assume that it's conflict of interest and the person is promoting his/her obscure product.  At the very least, it doesn't deserve to be ahead of any of those listed on the page to begin with.  If anyone thinks that "NuSphere" fits Wikipedia's notability requirements, please speak up.  Otherwise, I'm going to assume that it's okay to give it the axe due to it not being notable.  --koder 20:06, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Since nobody spoke up, I yanked it. --slakr 23:22, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

text: NuSphere has been around for MANY years. I've heard of their IDE and other products many times in the past. I'm sure the IA Archive's WayBack machine could verify this if needed.--Bobbozzo (talk) 04:54, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "NuSphere?"
Talk:Line 1 (Beijing Subway)

message: Seems a recent edit has messed with the table listing all the stations.  It is no longer able to be edited.  Can someone fix?
Hello, I fixed it. Now you can click the "E" at the top of the table to edit the table.Daeebachoo2 (talk) 10:02, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Station Table Not Editable 

message: Hello,
It seems that as of now, the models of the former sections of Line 1 and Batong Line are all operating on both lines. Maybe it should be reflected in the this article as well as articles Batong line and Rolling stock of Beijing Subway?
Thank you,
IP 82.135.168.52 (talk) 16:08, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rolling stock of the through operations
Talk:Frank Yates

message: This article needs a sentence describing Yates's correction for continuity or possibly just a reference under the heading See also.--User:Brenont (talk) 02:04, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yates' correction for continuity 
Talk:Frank Zito

message: "Frank Zito" is also the name of the serial-killer lead character of Maniac, who is occasionally name-checked in Necro's raps, in much the same way other rappers might reference Al Pacino's mobster character Tony Montana from Scarface.      Asat (talk) 03:55, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Statutes of Mortmain

message: I moved discussion of alienation to Quia_Emptores because I feel that is a more appropriate place for it. What do you think, A E Francis? Count Truthstein (talk) 17:04, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Changes to alienation before the statutes is important; maybe there could be a summary of this with a link to Quia Emptores for more information. Count Truthstein (talk) 14:53, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

text: So I've included the two types of alienation and opinions on when it was possible. I've included two examples of how it could deprive the overlord of their rights, including the example of frankalmoign which is germane to this article. I have not read your references to Plucknett and Holdsworth so far. There could be some discussion of changes to alienation in the period you mention if it is not covered already. Count Truthstein (talk) 13:47, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion of alienation 

message: "One cannot overstate the power of the tenant in the mid 13th Century, where the Black Death had, virtually overnight, reduced the population of the kingdom by between one-third and one-half, and created a changed economic reality, a seller's market,..." except that this event occurred in the mid 14th century (Summer of 1348) Ellay1964 (talk) 15:46, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Black Death 

message: 'The issue was only finally resolved in 1535, when Henry VIII dissolved the monasteries, confiscating all monastic lands for the Crown, though the bishops remained endowed with much land.'
This is my new phrasing, correcting the idea that the crown took ownership of ALL church land. However my knowledge isn't enough to know how the issue addressed by Mortmain was addressed during the Tudor period and later, although endowing the church seems to be less of a feature thereafter... Ender's Shadow Snr (talk) 17:58, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in summary: post dissolution land grants
Talk:Deutschlandfunk Kultur

message: This is not a commonly-used expression in English. The country was known as East Germany.
*I disagree with the first of those claims. "East Germany" may certainly be the more commonly encountered colloquial expression, but GDR (sometimes even DDR) is, and was, used often enough to be well understood – certainly in the UK (colloquially known as "Britain"), and especially in serious/scholarly contexts. A bit like the USSR (colloquially: "Russia"). -- Picapica (talk) 12:53, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: GDR

message: The chronology as currently given is somewhat muddled, with the intro and History paragraphs contradicting each other with regard to dates. Unless someone else beats me to it, I will re-write as soon as may be, moving all dates from the intro to the History section. -- Picapica (talk) 12:58, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Chronology
Talk:Quảng Nam province

message: Article needs literal meaning of province name, and Han Tu. Badagnani 07:31, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Literal meaning
Talk:Treaty of Orvieto

message: At first glance the article looks under-referenced to me. There are simply too few sources, and even though I'm not an expert on the subject I suspect some of the most important sources might be missing. I'm not gonna weigh in on the review, but I'd suggest starting with David Abulafia's (ed.) The New Cambridge Medieval History: Volume 5, c.1198-c.1300 (pp. 153-4 et passim.) It's available online at Amazon. Lampman Talk to me! 15:21, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately, I'm leaving for a convention today, but I'll take a look when I get back. Even relatively specialized histories sometimes give this treaty pretty short shrift, probably because it didn't have the dynastic consequences of the Treaty of Viterbo. E.g., Riley-Smith's Crusades and Hazard's History of the Crusades v. III' (link) confine themselves to a sentence or two about how Charles brought the Venetians into the alliance. Choess (talk) 13:55, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I suspected as much. Still, it would be good to have a wider array of sources, both to ensure a balanced presentation, and to give readers an idea of where to go for further reading - if not so much on the specific subject, at least on the general period. Lampman Talk to me! 20:02, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Tam Kỳ

message: TAM KY la noi co khong khi trong lanh,mot hon que yen tinh  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.20.214.81 (talk) 06:16, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Franklin Dodge

message: I have just spent hours pouring through city directories and census records, and if Frank married, I have no idea when it was. There are no marriage records. He lived for many years with his mother, siblings, and niece and nephews. The 1950 census says "never married" beneath Frank's name. Piratemika (talk) 02:19, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Frank never married