Talk:G protein

message: Just wanna say that you've done a great job re-editing this page already.
I can't figure out that rectangle, either.  I guess this means I should hit the books ..... :-)
-- PFHLai 22:36, 2004 May 25 (UTC)
----
I don't understand why Jiang would label this G protein page "clean enough". The last paragraph is not fixed yet, and there is still too little info on the beta and gamma subunits ....  ??????
-- PFHLai 00:25, 2004 May 26 (UTC)
----
For the record, Sayeth has fixed this page, and it's indeed "clean enough" now.  Maybe Jiang is psychic or sth .....  :-)
-- PFHLai 15:34, 2004 Jun 6 (UTC)
----
Of course Jiang is psychic, he's a super-wikipedian!
-- Sayeth 16:38, 8 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  To Sayeth 

message: These two edits   may be a copyright violations. The editor will only divulge that the source is "online" and has made numerous similar edits that are copyright violations.  I propose removing all of what remains from those edits: the Introduction, Serpentine Receptors, and G protein–coupled receptors Sections. --Ronz 16:45, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.  If I could find the source and knew it was a copyvio, I would be more inclined to get rid of it quicker.  --Ronz 00:46, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the information in question November 20. --Ronz 02:47, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible Copyvio

message: Need to include info on Gs, Gi.
*control mechanisms of GTP and GDP  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.240.59.98 (talk) 23:12, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: incomplete article

message: Isn't this article suppose to be ENGLISH?   :Fixed. 151.61.151.235 (talk) 17:02, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Language 

message: Should this be merged with G_protein-coupled_receptor maybe with a redirect?doctorwolfie (talk) 13:12, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Favor – G proteins have one major function- that in G protein-coupled receptors User:Jbachna (talk) 18:21, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

text: This merger proposal was not entered in a manner on Wikipedia that could be opened up for a proper discussion ... fixing this issue by adding templates to both articles, and fixing the title of this section. In addition, per WP:MERGE, this discussion should have been placed on Talk:G protein-coupled receptor; starting a new discussion on that article. Steel1943 (talk) 17:02, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger with G protein-coupled receptor

message: Would it be posible to add full names or links of hormones in the Specific mechanisms section? I don't know what is LH for example, and its hard to google it from just two letters long abbreviation. --78.80.8.197 (talk) 19:03, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  hormone full names/links 

message: In June 2011, Heterotrimeric G protein was recommended to be merged into G protein, but the discussion was not properly started. I am not an expert in this field, but from what it looks like from what I see, it looks like the two articles refer to similar topics. Should these two articles be merged? Steel1943 (talk) 16:57, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Closing discussion for new merger proposal. Steel1943 (talk) 17:19, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger Proposal with Heterotrimeric G protein