lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Flying Battery Zone

message: A tag has been placed on :Flying Battery Zone, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. If you plan to provide more material to the article, I advise you to do so immediately, and also put a note on Talk:Flying Battery Zone. An administrator should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 1 under Articles. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template 
There a mushroom hill zone. So flying battery should get one too. Philip1992 18:41, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[:'''Flying Battery Zone]]
Talk:Moores School of Music

message: As an alum, I'm glad to see this article has been created.  However, virtually all of the text has been lifted without attribution directly from the Moores School webpage.  Please recast this information in your own words; cite source material for any direct quotes.Emoll 20:29, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have begun rewriting this article, as most of it at this point is plagiarized.  Please allow me to continue, and do not delete the article!Emoll 22:03, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewriting 

message: Since this is a page about the Moores School of Music, I don't see why it is necessary, let alone appropriate, to rattle off a list of musicians who went to U of H but were not students in the School of Music. AntarcticFox (talk) 00:39, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I think that was a good idea.  Nice work. Brianreading (talk) 22:11, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Noted Alumni" 
Talk:Thomas J. Fiscus

message: There are NO cites in this article.
Phrases like "to his credit" are used.
"Fiscus vigorously prosecuted airmen for all sorts of infractions without mercy." 
Avocats (talk) 07:33, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Why?

message: The website created by the Fiscus is pretty gud:  http://www.thomasjfiscus.net.
The dude pretty much lays it all out there.  Some good reading and it puts it in perspective.  I think he takes advantage of perceived political conspiracy theories in order to blame his troubles on Dick Cheney, but besides that he presents a compelling case that the charges against him are not as bad as they seem.  Of course he says he is guilty of nothing.  I believe the truth is that there may have been some violations, but not bad enough for an Article 15 or a bust of two grades.  That bust of two grades costs him thousands of dollars every month.  The common enlisted soldier sitting at Fort Leavenworth may not appreciate this sacrifice, but that is a pretty damning punishment and disproportionate to the wrong doing.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.116.212.23 (talk) 22:03, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Fiscus Website 
Talk:Grocery Outlet

message: The section below has several typos, sentence construction problems and does not site a source...
Contreversy
Alot of people complain about alot of the time Grocery Outlet sells food items past their expiration date- For example, item that expired in September is being sold now.--24.119.3.200 20:55, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:VM-CP

message: I created this page as a place for material specific to VM-CP. There is a good deal of confusing (and wrong) nomenclature relating to CP/CMS and VM so I thought that having explicit subpages for CP-67, VM-CP, etc. would help establish a correct taxonomy. I had omitted the  link however.
If you disagree with this approach, and still feel that this should be merged, then by all means put the  tag back and discuss the issue. Trevor Hanson 20:46, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging
Talk:List of raids

message: This article lists raids. Does this include the Chevauchée of, for example,  the Black Prince during the Hundred Years War which were large armed forces moving across enemy territory with the intention of disrupting local communities and proving a military reaction? In modern terms this may be similar to a recconaisance in force. Prestonmag (talk) 21:50, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Chevauchee

message: There seems to be a heavy emphasis on English and US raids. Aren't there fairly large numbers of raids missing from, say, the Ottoman Empire, the Napoleonic conquests, the Anglo-Indian colonial period, and ancient Rome, just for a few obvious suggestions?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.159.232.121 (talk) 19:45, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  English / American overemphasis? 
Talk:Hermann Goetz

message: I believe the the string quartet is in B♭ major actually (B-dur not H-dur) so far as I know; has anyone seen the recently-published score? Schissel | Sound the Note! 20:54, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Melissa Lingafelt

message: Can't find another source but there is this picture from Wireimage (see this page for further details). -- PageantUpdater • talk | contribs | esperanza 07:54, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: See also this from Film Magic -- PageantUpdater • talk | contribs | esperanza 07:56, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Isn't is biased to say that Drake can do better and would be better off with an Australian? I don't think there is any need for this bit of information. This is making a negative comment about a living person. Kirstyem 15:33, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hollywood Xmas Parade
Talk:Seinfeld season 5

message: I have removed this and the other "season" articles from all tv show categories except :Category:Seinfeld.  The reason is that these articles are essentially sub-articles for the main article Seinfeld, and only the main article should appear in categories that list television series.  Including all these sub articles creates what are essentially duplicate links to the same overall topic.  You're essentially listing the show Seinfeld ten times under each category, when in fact it only needs to appear once.
To summarize, in general sub-articles for television shows should not be placed in the same television category as the main article for that show.  Doing so creates unnecessary duplicate listings. Dugwiki 21:03, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed from tv categories except [[:Category:Seinfeld]] 

message: It seems that this article is using colours in the infobox which don't satisfy Wikipedia's accessibility guidelines. The contrast between the foreground colour and the background colour is low, which means that it may be difficult or impossible for people with visual impairments to read it.
To correct this problem, a group of editors have decided to remove support for invalid colours from Template:Infobox television season and other television season templates after 1 September 2015. If you would still like to use custom colours for the infobox and episode list in this article after that date, please ensure that the colours meet the WCAG AAA standard.
To test whether a colour combination is AAA-compliant you can use Snook's colour contrast tool. If your background colour is dark, then please test it against a foreground colour of "FFFFFF" (white). If it is light, please test it against a foreground colour of "000000" (black). The tool needs to say "YES" in the box for "WCAG 2 AAA Compliant" when you input the foreground and the background colour. You can generally make your colour compliant by adjusting the "Value (%)" fader in the middle box.
Please be sure to change the invalid colour in every place that it appears, including the infobox, the episode list, and the series overview table. If you have any questions about this, please ask on Template talk:Infobox television season. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:30, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colour contrast problems
Talk:Seinfeld season 6

message: I have removed this and the other "season" articles from all tv show categories except :Category:Seinfeld.  The reason is that these articles are essentially sub-articles for the main article Seinfeld, and only the main article should appear in categories that list television series.  Including all these sub articles creates what are essentially duplicate links to the same overall topic.  You're essentially listing the show Seinfeld ten times under each category, when in fact it only needs to appear once.
To summarize, in general sub-articles for television shows should not be placed in the same television category as the main article for that show.  Doing so creates unnecessary duplicate listings. Dugwiki 21:05, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed from tv categories except [[:Category:Seinfeld]] 

message: The guy is called "Jimmy" not "The Jimmy." "The Jimmy" is the phrase they use to describe the way he talks.Arnold Rothstein1921 (talk) 18:32, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: The Jimmy
Talk:Seinfeld season 7

message: I have removed this and the other "season" articles from all tv show categories except :Category:Seinfeld.  The reason is that these articles are essentially sub-articles for the main article Seinfeld, and only the main article should appear in categories that list television series.  Including all these sub articles creates what are essentially duplicate links to the same overall topic.  You're essentially listing the show Seinfeld ten times under each category, when in fact it only needs to appear once.
To summarize, in general sub-articles for television shows should not be placed in the same television category as the main article for that show.  Doing so creates unnecessary duplicate listings. Dugwiki 21:08, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed from tv categories except [[:Category:Seinfeld]] 

message: It seems that this article is using colours in the infobox which don't satisfy Wikipedia's accessibility guidelines. The contrast between the foreground colour and the background colour is low, which means that it may be difficult or impossible for people with visual impairments to read it.
To correct this problem, a group of editors have decided to remove support for invalid colours from Template:Infobox television season and other television season templates after 1 September 2015. If you would still like to use custom colours for the infobox and episode list in this article after that date, please ensure that the colours meet the WCAG AAA standard.
To test whether a colour combination is AAA-compliant you can use Snook's colour contrast tool. If your background colour is dark, then please test it against a foreground colour of "FFFFFF" (white). If it is light, please test it against a foreground colour of "000000" (black). The tool needs to say "YES" in the box for "WCAG 2 AAA Compliant" when you input the foreground and the background colour. You can generally make your colour compliant by adjusting the "Value (%)" fader in the middle box.
Please be sure to change the invalid colour in every place that it appears, including the infobox, the episode list, and the series overview table. If you have any questions about this, please ask on Template talk:Infobox television season. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:30, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colour contrast problems
Talk:Seinfeld season 8

message: I have removed this and the other "season" articles from all tv show categories except :Category:Seinfeld.  The reason is that these articles are essentially sub-articles for the main article Seinfeld, and only the main article should appear in categories that list television series.  Including all these sub articles creates what are essentially duplicate links to the same overall topic.  You're essentially listing the show Seinfeld ten times under each category, when in fact it only needs to appear once.
To summarize, in general sub-articles for television shows should not be placed in the same television category as the main article for that show.  Doing so creates unnecessary duplicate listings. Dugwiki 21:10, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed from tv categories except [[:Category:Seinfeld]]
Talk:What Ever Happened to Baby Jane? (novel)

message: the plot synopsis ends with "The picture zooms out to Jane dancing in the middle of the crowd and the police bended over Blanche. It is not revealed if they were there in time to save her life."
This is meant to be the page for the NOVEL. This is describing the final shots of the film.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.126.103.242 (talk) 18:58, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Talk:Seinfeld season 9

message: I have removed this and the other "season" articles from all tv show categories except :Category:Seinfeld.  The reason is that these articles are essentially sub-articles for the main article Seinfeld, and only the main article should appear in categories that list television series.  Including all these sub articles creates what are essentially duplicate links to the same overall topic.  You're essentially listing the show Seinfeld ten times under each category, when in fact it only needs to appear once.
To summarize, in general sub-articles for television shows should not be placed in the same television category as the main article for that show.  Doing so creates unnecessary duplicate listings. Dugwiki 21:11, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed from tv categories except [[:Category:Seinfeld]] 

message: It seems that this article is using colours in the infobox which don't satisfy Wikipedia's accessibility guidelines. The contrast between the foreground colour and the background colour is low, which means that it may be difficult or impossible for people with visual impairments to read it.
To correct this problem, a group of editors have decided to remove support for invalid colours from Template:Infobox television season and other television season templates after 1 September 2015. If you would still like to use custom colours for the infobox and episode list in this article after that date, please ensure that the colours meet the WCAG AAA standard.
To test whether a colour combination is AAA-compliant you can use Snook's colour contrast tool. If your background colour is dark, then please test it against a foreground colour of "FFFFFF" (white). If it is light, please test it against a foreground colour of "000000" (black). The tool needs to say "YES" in the box for "WCAG 2 AAA Compliant" when you input the foreground and the background colour. You can generally make your colour compliant by adjusting the "Value (%)" fader in the middle box.
Please be sure to change the invalid colour in every place that it appears, including the infobox, the episode list, and the series overview table. If you have any questions about this, please ask on Template talk:Infobox television season. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:30, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colour contrast problems
Talk:Present day

message: I've put this in Narratology for now, though i feel this article may well fit a different catagory and require wikifying and/or clean up. LordFenix 21:15, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: The respectable websites www.thefreedictionary.com, www.merriam-webster.com, and dictionary.reference.com all have this phrase hyphenated. Should the article be corrected in light of this?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.187.250.187 (talk) 02:19, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hyphenated
Talk:The Status Civilization

message: This book review needs rewriting since the reviewer inadvertently spoils the ending of the book drastically - m1fcj  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.1.47.7 (talk) 22:41, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Spoilers are allowed (and not even flagged) on WP, but I agree it needed rewriting. Pastychomper (talk) 12:41, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

message: The Plot Summary is more description of the Earth society than of the plot. And at least half of the book takes place on Omega, whose society is much better described than Earth's.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cptbutton (talk • contribs) 19:15, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. My attempt could probably be improved, feels a bit wordy but it's more balanced now. Pastychomper (talk) 12:40, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Summary is only half the book.
Talk:Dr. Futurity

message: I tried to clean up this plot section in the article quite a bit, as there were several factual errors throughout. This is the first time I have edited an article, however, so let me know if anything was done incorrectly. --GStachelek (talk) 16:03, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot 
Talk:Area codes 615 and 629

message: "With the growth of the area, it is likely that 615 will split again in the future (or an overlay code may be added), though no plan has been announced to do so." The Wiki is NOT a crystal ball. Jon 21:20, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Crystal Ball text removed
Category talk:Academic transfer

message: Hrmmm... Is anyone watching this page?
It looks like we have about three separate categories here which we've thrown together.
* Exchanges (short term: one or two semester, such as DAAD, etc., both at secondary and tertiary levels)
* Full transfer (long term university switching)
* Levelling up (sorry, playing too many RPGs today) from high school to university.
Would it make more sense to handle them separately? samwaltz 21:21, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Rethink
Talk:Long Island Power Authority

message: Richard Kessel stepped down as CEO. As of December 11, he remains Chairman of LIPA. Ucscottb4u 21:28, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Richard Kessel 

message: So what dose Lipa do other than collect peoples checks for power bills and mail them off to national grid.--J intela (talk) 09:05, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Purpose

message: The article now opens "The Long Island Power Authority or LIPA [ "lie-pah" ], a municipal subdivision of the State of New York, was created under the Long Island Power Act of 1985 to acquire the Long Island Lighting Company (LILCO)'s assets and securities." LIPA did not purchase and does not own LILCO's former gas transmission and distribution assets or its generation assets, all of which were acquired by National Grid.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.74.13.100 (talk) 19:38, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  LIPA did not buy all of LILCO 

message: Eh? Does this mean, like a county? Isn't this one of the many New York state public benefit corporations? Jim.henderson (talk) 18:34, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Municipal subdivision? 
Talk:Riders in the Chariot

message: It may seem lumpy but I'm slowly expanding the article from a stub, so not dotting all i's and t's at all times. Newbie novels editor,  : ) Julia Rossi (talk) 07:47, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lumpy 
Talk:Stephen Mallinder

message: Dates of birth conflict between text and meta data/categories. Needs verification of birth from external sources and fix in article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.96.18.75 (talk) 04:45, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Drowned World

message: I wonder if the title is a reference to or was inspired by either the legend of Ys or Claude Debussy's le cathedral engloutie "the drowned cathedral" which was inspired by Ys. Novaterata 07:15, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Little Fuzzy

message: His secret project of a while ago has been revealed as a reboot of the series. http://whatever.scalzi.com/2010/04/07/the-super-secret-thing-that-i-cannot-tell-you-about-revealed-introducing-fuzzy-nation/
Supposedly with the after-the-writing approval of Piper's estate.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by OtterSmith (talk • contribs) 22:21, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  John Scalzi trying to reboot the series? 

message: That seems like it deserves some sort of mention here. PapayaSF (talk) 01:48, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: For that, you need a reliable source. Otherwise its original research. -- Beardo (talk) 03:44, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: No mention of Fuzzies as inspirations for Ewoks?

message: This first book sounds rather similar to Les Animaux denatures written by Vercors (aka Jean Bruller) and published in 1953.
Granted the Vercors novel occurs here on Earth (New Guinea specifically) and Little Fuzzy occurs in outer space (the planet Zarathustra); but the basic plot element of a trial to determine if they are human/sentient or just animals is extremely similar.
Any thought to somehow including some reference to the Vercors work in this article? 2600:8800:784:8F00:C23F:D5FF:FEC4:D51D (talk) 11:48, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: For that, too, you need a reliable source. Otherwise it's original research. -- Beardo (talk) 03:45, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Similar to . . . 

message: Please do not restore the anecdote about "Kevin Sheffield" unless you can cite a source from before it was added to this article in 2008. Otherwise, we risk citogenesis. Thank you. DS (talk) 18:00, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sheffield
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Council/Exemplar WikiProjects

message: *Should we go for a specific number, or try to include all projects we think qualify?
*Should they all be general exemplars, or should we try to break down into categories, like the Academy Awards and other such awards? In this case, maybe "Best Project for promotion of Featured Articles," "Best Project for General Improvement of All Articles," "Best New Project," and the like.
*What should the specific criteria for "passing" a WikiProject into "exemplar" status be? 
I know others exist as well. Please feel free to add any questions or comments below. Badbilltucker 21:34, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think we should avoid getting too ceremonial in this venture. Afterall, the aim is to provide examples for developing projects, not to stroke the egos of those which are already doing well. Therefore, I think categorising projects per an awards scheme is probably a Bad Idea; it should be thought of as part of the guide, rather than as a "status" ladder.--cj | talk 01:09, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Existing questions

message: I'm flattered that this was included, but I've removed it as I don't think it sets the best of examples.
Whilst the project has been successful in producing high quality, featured output (undoubtedly the most important thing a project can do), it has the downsides of being very small in membership and prone to replication by fans of other bands who create a WikiProject then do nothing. I think it would be best if WP:KLF is left to quietly exist without being listed as some model project :) Thanks. --kingboyk 17:06, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:KLF]]