lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Lisa Marie (actress)

message: Why is there a category for "Natural Breasts" under her mini profile at the top right?207.216.163.126 (talk) 06:14, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism?

message: Editors should always consult an article's discussion page before considering to rename it.  Having, unfortunately, failed to follow that stricture, I subsequently noticed the above WP:RM and realized that any renaming may be considered as controversial and therefore should be put up for discussion.  Having said that, I need to reaffirm my reason for the move, which stems from the fact that the subject, herself, uses "Lisa Marie" as her stage name, confirmed by her listing on IMDb, and is not known to the public as "Lisa Marie Smith".  The parenthetical qualifier "(actress)" becomes, of course, necessary since there is already a Wikipedia disambiguation page which uses Lisa Marie as its title and contains some ten entries listing subjects who use "Lisa Marie" as their given name.  If there is any objection to today's move, please indicate so below, thus allowing for another discussion and, if need be, restoration of previous title or proposal for another title.—Roman Spinner (talk) 18:29, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move of Lisa Marie Smith to Lisa Marie (actress)
Talk:Lisa Moore (musician)

message: This is consistent with the encyclopedia format. Note I have included references to interview so the info is on the pubic record. Happy to discuss  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chrisfromcanberra (talk • contribs) 09:35, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  I have added info under a Personal 

message: I have attempted to find references for the quotes in the lead paragraph especially the ""New York's queen of avant-garde piano" etc. The NY archive search engine seems to be pretty comprehensive and didn't return any quotes along that line. Chrisfromcanberra (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 00:40, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Have marked quotes as unsourced references
Talk:Lisa Nowak

message: Lisa Nowak was referenced in the second episode of the Netflix animated series HOOPS, but I don't know how to make an adequate reference or link.  2607:FEA8:8420:E75B:856E:6D1A:F2B2:DECE (talk) 03:54, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Unless it's been covered in a WP:RS, please don't. TJRC (talk) 06:42, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:   Referenced in animation series HOOPS 

message: I suppose you can describe her as convicted criminal but I just found it a very cruel and non-formal way to address someone's biography. It would make sense if the article is about a person who is notable for being a  criminal, but I felt like in this case putting that in the later parts of lead by briefly mentioning in the section concerning her personal life is most appropriate. Not to mention this undermines her scientific contributions which should be the focus points of the article because the first things that caught my attention is she being described as a convicted criminal. Wingwatchers (talk) 02:55, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed Hawkeye7 (discuss) 06:00, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  convicted criminal? 

message: Swapped out after half day per this discussion at ERRORS. SandyGeorgia (Talk)  03:51, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  September 14 TFA
Talk:Lisa Potts

message: ::There is no photo of Horrett Campbell in the article.
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.135.206.96 (talk) 17:17, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The attacker is also known as Horrett Irving Campbell. He seems to be in a secure loony bin now.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.154.14.230 (talk) 12:52, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: A Google search with "Horrett Campbell, photo" should produce a BBC photo.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.154.14.230 (talk) 13:17, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

text: I would consider a picture of the attacker not vital to this article, would belong more to an article about the man himself or the attack. It would also be anomalous to have a picture of the attacker without one of the victim who is the subject of this article, surely there are more available images of Lisa Potts?Cloptonson (talk) 09:04, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  No photo 

message: This article was briefly redirected. I feel the subject is umambiguously notable and should not be redirected again without consensus to do so. Everyking 23:26, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I see the potential for a biography, yes. Let's change it into a full biography instead of a discussion about a single event in her life. I hate to see sub par articles about living people. The article had vandalism that remained for over 24 hours before being removed.  If we can not do it right then a mention about the single event in the George Medal is the best way to go for now, I think. I hope someone has the time and interest to keep improving it. FloNight 21:20, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I agree with Everyking that the article should not be redirected again without consensus. I believe there is a place for articles about people who are mostly known for only one event and it is appropriate for those articles to focus on the event. If written policies do not currently recognize this then I think they need to be improved. I am willing to discuss this principle, but I wish to emphasize that discussion is in order before anyone re-blanks the contents of this page.  Kla'quot (talk | contribs) 22:08, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect
Talk:Lisa Pulitzer

message: I'm going to do a bit of a tidy up, this page is out of date and it would read better with proper categories. I would appreciate it if any other editor has a photo of the author in public domain which could be used if they could upload it to wikimedia commons.
I'd also like to know if it's possible to list works which an author has ghostwritten because I know she has done a few books this way, but i'm not finding any seconary sources for obvious reasons. Mramoeba (talk) 23:30, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I Didn't manage to find a photo unfortunately. Also I would have liked more information about her 'other projects' but couldn't find secondary sources. Mramoeba (talk) 23:38, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Tidy up
Talk:List of awards and nominations received by Johnny Depp

message: These were strays, introduced by a user indicating the Depp had won an academy award? –xenotalk 06:08, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stray citations
Talk:Lisa Salters

message: I won't repeat it, but there was some negative information about Salters in the article that I removed. Both sources cited for it either were dead or didn't even mention her. Courcelles (talk) 18:53, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: BLP
Talk:Lisa Spoonauer

message: Obit says "Saturday, May 21". Saturday was the 20th. Bleeding Cool cites the Clerks cast as reporting "Saturday". (Edit: Obit now says "Sunday, May 21".) — Wyliepedia 00:10, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death date. 

message: Why does our article sit at 'Spoonhauer' when most sources say "Spoonauer"?  I'm going to just move it, but please move it back if there is any real reason.--Jimbo Wales (talk) 07:41, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm guessing this was created after her second film, which miscredited her with the "h". Neither the credits nor the poster for Clerks has it. — Wyliepedia 09:10, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling of name?
Talk:Lisa Wilhoit

message: I read in a tabloid that Lisa Wilhoit was in 7th Heaven at one point. The article was called something like "My So-Called Life, Where Are They Now?" including Claire Danes and the other stars of the hit show. My parents gave my sister the one and only season of My So-Called Life, and it was fantastic. I still don't understand why this amazing show was canceled, as I have the same situation with the best show in the world, Gilmore Girls.
(24.189.185.82 (talk) 23:23, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  I read somewhere that Lisa Wilhoit was in 7th Heaven.
Talk:Lisa Willis

message: Edited some already, but this likely needs additional review. Improper or lacking sourcing, and favorable writing leads me to believe there is a conflict of interest. Youngjtdyt (talk) 22:41, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI
Talk:Rangsit Prayurasakdi

message: Date of release from Prison
I have changed, this:
Towards the end of the Second World War, after being jailed for 4 years and 9 months, Prince Rangsit was released along with other political prisoners by the new Seri Thai-dominated government.
to:
On 28th September 1943, having been jailed for 4 years and 9 months, Prince Rangsit was released by the government (1 year prior to the release of other political prisoners).
The date of Prince Rangsit's release was actually in September 1943, which was prior to the coup d'état which overthrewn the Phibun government in June 1944.  It is thus rather clear that Prince Rangsit's release predates the accession of the Seri Thai dominated government.
Regards
Maharaj Devraj
Hi. Could you substantiate this? it is an important issue that has much to do with Pridi's reputation. I have seen many references to his release coming after the June 44 ouster of Phibun, and that it was an issue of negotiation between Pridi and the Free Thai's Tan Chin to see if they could work together. Pridi is said to have been open-minded toward the royals because of this. If you are certain, was it a full release and cleaning his record or just a relocation of where he had to stay, or something else. You are challenging what has been written in many histories. MaiNaeJai 01:28, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lisa Zane

message: Wanted to mention that in this article, the original surname listed is, "Zanikopolous," but in the article for Billy Zane the original surname listed is, "Zanetakos," and there is a discrepancy with is/was usage between the two. Any thoughts on which should be used? Garonyldas (talk) 10:42, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Original Surname

message: FOUR other sources give April 5, 1961 rather than October 5.
FilmReference.com is either the only one right or the only one wrong. How it came to be used is anyone's guess.2600:8807:480A:1900:7108:FC4D:2C03:39B9 (talk) 00:56, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another birthday discrepancy - October 5 may be wrong 
Talk:Landfill gas monitoring

message: This page has some serious puncuation and grammatical errors (i.e. Missing periods, inappropriate capitalizations...)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.27.198.93 (talk) 02:32, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Looking at the "What links here" report for Landfill gas monitoring shows that most of the links are really to the Landfill gas redirect page, and probably in contexts other than monitoring.  A proper Landfill gas article is really needed.--Theodore Kloba (talk) 15:08, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. See Landfill gas. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 20:57, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New '''Landfill gas''' article needed
Talk:Liselotte Pulver

message: The following needs to be better supported with references, please:
:Despite a wide variety of roles, she is best remembered for the hearty and joyful laughter she displayed in comedies.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.231.144.224 (talk) 18:11, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  laughter 

message: Notwithstanding the articles inset pic of Frow Pulver (which looks unlike either actress), reckon the article should byword something like 'not to be mistaken for lookalike Austrian actress of the same filmdays Heidemarie Hatheyer' or somesuch...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:490:A600:B887:CF8:66F1:1033 (talk) 23:22, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bemuddling lookalikes - Swiss actress Liselotte Pulver and Austrian actress Heidemarie Hatheyer 
Talk:List of exhibitions by Olafur Eliasson

message: There is no source for this list.  ludahai 魯大海 07:15, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Citation

message: This article was nominated for deletion in 2010 by , and the result was keep. I'm pinging  who are the remaining active editors from that conversation. When editing artist biographies we try to avoid long lists like this, because they are like CVs. I have never seen a list of exhibitions as a separate list. I actually did a search, and found that this is the only such list in all of Wikipedia. I'm inclined to nominate this for deletion again (with the suggestion that this be merged into the prose of the main article's exhibitions section) but I wanted to raise a conversation here with the invested parties. --Theredproject (talk) 17:16, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I said at the previous round, "excessive detail for anyone who is merely notable and not famous. In the absence of a book about him, he is not yet famous (sat least that's my minimum criterion for famous) I tend to be mergist on these lists--I think they are generally more useful as part of the article. " ; turned out that there  is a book, but that minimum criterion I suggested was very  much too minimal. I should have realized there were individual books about many thousands of artists, and that's really just the criterion for clearly notable.  Since 07 we've greatly  expanded our art coverage, and it is established every individual major work of every very notable artist can justify an article, but no artist at all has a separate list of exhibitions.  I can see that some might possibly be justified, but we should start at he top, not the middle. This is a candidate for merge, and I do not see who would oppose. if anyone does, it can be discussed.  DGG ( talk ) 05:37, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for that confirmation  --Theredproject (talk) 18:49, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  first discussion in over a decade - delete?
Talk:Lister Sinclair

message: The last sentence in the article ends with a preposition.  Lister would not have approved.Landroo (talk) 16:27, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammar?
Talk:Boronia Heights College

message: Victuallers 19:10, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

message: Boronia Heights College is in Boronia Heights, Victoria.
 
No it isn't, it's in Boronia. Although the school adress is Mount View Rd, The Basin. So it could be changed to The Basin if one wants to do it. Xt881m 12:58, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Liu Dong

message: --SilasW 17:14, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

message: This article expresses two times in the format "1:55.54 minutes" which has no clear meaning.  Perhaps "minutes" should be omitted. Wikipedia is for spreading knowledge, not for providing guessing games.--SilasW 17:14, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: @SilasW, , in the future you are free to be WP:BOLD and make the change yourself. --Habst (talk) 17:33, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:El Último de la Fila

message: Manolo García was born in "Poble Nou", Barcelona and not in "Félez", Albacete.
:He was born in Férez, Albacete though he was raised in Poble Nou. Check this site (or others).--RiseRover|talk 12:43, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Liu Shahe

message: The second source cited  is enough coverage to satisfy the notability guidelines. Hut 8.5 15:17, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: Both the man's real name and the title of his column are in simplified characters. Shouldn't this be changed?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.5.251.99 (talk) 00:04, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: It is certainly ironic. But even FT uses simplified characters for the name of his column, see here. Simplified characters are so prevalent now it'll be hard to revert the trend. I've at least changed his own name to traditional characters. -Zanhe (talk) 04:59, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Irony 

message: Why should Traditional Chinese be in the lead? This is an article based in mainland People's Republic of China, and it should prioritize using the writing system of the country, which is Simplified Chinese. Let me ask you this, why are the PRC-related biographies Xi Jinping, Hu Jintao, Zhou Enlai, Li Keqiang, Mao Zedong use only Simplified Chinese in the lead, and why are Hong Kong-related biographies Carrie Lam, Joshua Wong, Nathan Law use only Traditional Chinese in the lead, and Taiwan-related biographies Chen Shui-bian and Lee Teng-hui use only Traditional Chinese in the lead? The same could go for pre-PRC China biographies such as the Emperors and ministers of Imperial China using Traditional Chinese in the lead. According to your reasoning, both Simplified Chinese and Traditional Chinese should both be in the lead no matter what. But by this, it just provides more clutter in the zh templates and in addition, it does not add relevance to the environment and time period the biography is set in. - 祝好，Josephua(聊天) 06:41, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: If you do not respond, I can assume that you see my reason on why this article should prioritize Simplified Chinese in the lead and not Traditional, and therefore you agree with my edit, and therefore, revert your edit. - 祝好，Josephua(聊天) 18:50, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Simplified vs Traditional in Lead
Talk:Liv Kristine

message: Liv didn't sing on the Album "Storm" of Theatre of Tragedy.Xgoth3 14:09, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Album Mistake 

message: Her birth name is listed as Krull, but isn't that the name she got from her husband?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.169.250.110 (talk) 01:30, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Her birth name isn't listed as Krull, her (current) full name is.  As far as I know her birth name and parentage is unknown. — Scythe 17:29, 26 Feb 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Birth Name
Talk:Liv Lindeland

message: This article doesn't agree with the playmate article (which is inconsistent with itself too):
:The first Playmate to show pubic hair was Liv Lindeland, Miss January 1971. An underwater photo by Russ Meyer taken of Marguerite Empey for her second appearance as a Playmate in February 1956 also showed pubic hair, but this photo did not attract public attention as much as Lindeland's centerfold appearance, perhaps because the magazine had a smaller circulation at that time. Neither did a picture showing the corner of Melodye Prentiss's pubic hair in July 1968.
Currently it suggests the first apparance was in 1969 not 1968 or 1956 as the above suggests. Since none of this is sourced, I'll leave it as is but someone needs to correct it Nil Einne 13:26, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article doesn't agree with Playmate artice 
Talk:Livingston Taylor

message: Just heard him singing on AOL radio, and I thought it was James. Same staccato, same style of ornamentation, same accent, same slightly flat pitch. Incredibly similar. Softlavender (talk) 10:12, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Having recently watched a recording of one of LT's concerts, the similarities between the two brothers are sometimes very obvious.  Most of his work is not like his brother's, though.  His style, his vocal and instrumental musicianship are broader and unlike those of James Taylor's and, dare I say, less predictable.  What's even more obvious: his personality is completely different.  In my opinion, for what it's worth, all of that is refreshing.Twistlethrop (talk) 07:50, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Sounds a lot like James
Talk:Liya Kebede

message: what is her last name before marriage?  if her husband's last name is kebede?
:They're true American rednecks; even if they got divorced, they'd still be brother and sister.  At least that's what some editor tried to tell us in a comment on the article page.  Gene Nygaard (talk) 01:07, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Liz Allen

message: Dear Wikipedia,
I am Liz Allen, the Irish author and former investigative journalist.  Following years of having my profile here, it was removed last September, rather the majority of the positive content was removed.  I tried editing it and it would allow me citing complaints and unverifiable material, which is completely incorrect. I was the subject of an attempted reputational sabotage by an individual this summer and of significant theft by this person (currently under investigation by Irish police)...  Then this week, I noticed that when you Google Liz Allen Irish journalist, a picture of an individual who definitely is not me, has been placed on the right hand side of the Google search when it pops up.
I am wondering if you can assist me please?  My email is liz.elise.78@gmail.com
many thanks.
Liz Allen  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.16.211.18 (talk) 14:43, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Your request has been answered here Jimfbleak - talk to me? 08:17, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  sabotage of profile: Request Edit
Talk:MFSTM

message: This article is only a stub, admittedly - but it really cannot remain in its present condition, for the following reasons:
* The entire article directly contradicts a paragraph of the Data recovery article, which claims that the recovery of overwritten data, "although theoretically possible to some extent, is today little more than a myth". This MFSTM article, meanwhile, claims that, "At least 1000 overwrites for each bit is needed to render useless current MFM methods.". Who is using these "current methods"? The Data recovery article states that:
: "It should also be noted that no data recovery company today claims that it can recover overwritten information as described in the second paragraph above.".
* Some of the quantitative statements in this article are far too ambiguous. What does "twenty or more times as sensitive" mean, when comparing a hard disk head with a tunneling microscope? What are those ".95 or 1.05 minuscule discrepancies in single bit overwrite"? 0.95 of what?
* I have no idea what is meant by "An enhanced parallel process (some form of polymorphic adaptation) algorithm with a sample of physical entropy (molecular level physical randomness)".
* Most importantly: there are no citations.
Mtford 08:39, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: An update: this article seems to be based on claims made in a paper by Peter Gutmann , which are fairly conclusively debunked here: . Clearly this article needs a rewrite, though I don't know if we can assume that Gutmann's claims about data recovery by intelligence agencies are mythological, without violating NPOV. Mtford 17:53, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup needed 

message: I've opted to redirect instead of deleting, per the prod tag. Though if the issues can be resolved, this seems like it could maybe potentially be a useful article. :) Luna Santin 19:27, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirecting to [[Data recovery]] -- [[WP:PROD|Prod]] since 9 September 2006
Talk:Liz Gordon

message: Recent contributions to this article have come from Lizgordon01. I've posted a notice on that user's talk page regarding WP:AUTO#IFEXIST. Schwede66 19:34, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent contributions
Talk:Liz Jackson

message: An editor has added a tag to NSW Premier's Department asking "which" department. But the point is it probably was the Premier's Department or something similar, that is she didn't work in one of the other ministries but in the Premier's own one. It is now called the Department of Premier and the Cabinet, and may have been called that then. I think the "which" tag is a little misleading here and could be removed. Sterry2607 (talk) 06:22, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which department comment