lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Robert Meier

message: Why did you make another article of the same name? One already exists... Oh, and see what I wrote to you in the history of the other one. Michaelas10 13:54, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I redirected the first article here. I don't agree that this is a speedy deletion candidate, at least not under A1. --mtz206 (talk) 12:50, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

text: I was thinking the same when I read the article. There has to be another one. It would be interesting to find something about that. /Johsan 13:15, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, but he definitely was the oldest one still living, which was the whole point in fact too. Extremely sexy 16:16, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think so too: Robert Meier was, perhaps, the last living person who met Wilhelm II during his reign. But remember that there is still one of Wilhelm's grand-children alive today. Prince Wilhelm Karl of Prussia (born in 1922) must have met his grandfather between 1922 and 1941. And I am pretty sure that there are a few other people still alive who met him. For example, there are still four of his great-grandchildren alive (including Queen Sophia of Spain), who were born before his death. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.137.110.108 (talk) 11:17, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Why?

message: I was checking where the subject's place of birth is, and I found the article :uk:Сергіївка in the Ukrainian language version of Wikipedia, but this is a disambiguation page with links to currently 24 places with the same name in Ukraine. Is there any information available as to which Sergejewka, Ukraine the subject was born in? Is the name even correct? Could it possibly be that this is the German language version of the name of the place and that the English language name is Sergeyevka or perhaps Sergiyivka? Coyets (talk) 12:06, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Place of birth - Sergejewka
Talk:1st Parachute Battalion (Australia)

message: This article needs in line citations to meet B class criteria. Can anyone help with this? Other than that I think it is not a bad article that provides a good summary of the topic. One suggestion, though, could a list of Commanding Officers be added? Also, if a Unit Colour Patch could be found and added, that would bring it in line with other Australian battalion articles. For example, see 14th Battalion (Australia). Cheers. AustralianRupert (talk) 00:56, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, looks like the citations are nearly done. I think that only a couple more are required. I have added the citation needed tags where I feel they are needed. If anyone can help add these, that would be great. After that I think it would probably be a B class article. Thanks for all the help so far. — AustralianRupert (talk) 00:33, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm pretty sure that I sourced that material from the book 'Eagles alighting'. Unfortunately, this was added way back in February 2006, which was before inline citations were standard and I don't have a copy of the book. Nick-D (talk) 00:50, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Quick response. Cheers, Nick. I might see if I can try to pick the book up somewhere. There's a goldmine antique/military bookstore near where I live, so I will have a look there. It frequently has the battalion histories. — AustralianRupert (talk) 01:04, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've just added those references, and think that the article is now ready for a B class assessment Nick-D (talk) 01:55, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs citations
Talk:Constitution of Indonesia

message: I have just submitted this article. As I am not a constitutional expert, I welcome any corrections or comments. I have used the terms "Chapter" for the Indonesian Bab in line with the standard translations used by the two major English language news publications here in Indonesia.
I am currently working on an English version of the amended Constitution for the Wikisource link. Davidelit 12:52, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Chapter IV is missing. Can you add it or justify why it is absent?? -தமிழ்க்குரிசில் (talk) 07:07, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems that Chapter IV has been removed from constitution. If necessary, that can be included as a part and stating that it has been removed later. -தமிழ்க்குரிசில் (talk) 07:12, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: New Article
Talk:No. 3 Security Forces Squadron RAAF

message: G'day, per this link on the RAAF website , it appears that this unit may have been re-raised, and renamed "No. 3 Security Forces Squadron". Can anyone confirm this, and if so what date it was re-raised and renamed? Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 07:07, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Gents, can either of you help with this? Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 07:27, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

text: AustralianRupert (talk) 10:17, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I think that's correct. The RAAF merged the Airfield Defence Guards and RAAF police into a larger number of squadrons a few years ago. I don't think that the relevant articles have been updated - from memory, when I looked into it the details of the changes were pretty obscure. Nick-D (talk) 10:27, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, Nick, I have found a couple of references, but they aren't great, unfortunately. I've moved the article now to match the other two squadrons. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 12:26, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for that. From memory, I don't think that there was a comprehensive article in the RAAF's in-house newspaper about this change, and the non-official defence media generally has little interest in the non-flying parts of the service. Nick-D (talk) 22:19, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Renamed/re-raised?
Talk:3rd Battalion, Royal Australian Regiment

message: this page needs updating 3rar were in afghanistan in 2012  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.149.45.30 (talk) 13:44, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Gday. I think this is already mentioned. Pls see the last sentence of the section entitled "Afghanistan" which states: "3 RAR formed the basis of a battle group that was deployed to the country again in 2012 tasked with mentoring the Afghan National Army 4th Brigade, 205th Corps, before handing over to 7 RAR in November." Anotherclown (talk) 00:35, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: In this image the Digger on the far right is CPL James Stewart "Blue" or "Bluey" Newell, 23573; I reckon. Regrettably Bluey passed away recently. We was good mates. I have seen photos of him in his younger days, it sure looks like him. I'll ask the Boss in the meanwhile. Duty First Tjlynnjr (talk) 20:06, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image of GEN Van Fleet, US Army with 3RAR 
Talk:The Adventures of Twizzle

message: As I've just written it, the article credits Barry Gray with music for the series (as per IMDB).  BFI Screenonline credits Leslie Clair.  If anyone knows definitively which is correct, please make the necessary adjustments to the article.  Thanks.  Cain Mosni 12:54, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fanderson also say it was Barry Gray, so I would assume that it was him. Thanks for writing this article, by the way - I'll have to have a go at Torchy (although I've never seen either!) Bob 13:52, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Conflict over music credits

message: I have to say, I do have a certain grudging admiration for the fellow who dreamed up the episode titles "TWIZZLE VISITS A MORTICIAN" and "FOOTSO DEALS WITH DEPRESSION". The fact they remained there for just over six months is probably testament to their congruity the rest of the episode names, I suspect. Bob talk 17:24, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lol 

message: I was born 1960 but remember this, was it shown in later years? Or do I just know the songs maybe from a record?  I certainly remember songs by Jiffy, Chalky and Twizzle, as well as the cat. 37.10.70.115 (talk) 20:32, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was there a record?
Talk:5th/7th Battalion, Royal Australian Regiment

message: B Coy was in Afghanistan when the Battalion de-linked. This is stated in both the 5RAR and 7RAR pages.AJAussie (talk) 12:36, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added something on this now. Anotherclown (talk) 10:11, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Final Deployment?
Talk:51st Battalion, Far North Queensland Regiment

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on 51st Battalion, Far North Queensland Regiment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110707064901/http://www.51fnqra.com/unithistory/worldwar1.html to http://www.51fnqra.com/unithistory/worldwar1.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
 --Lineagegeek (talk) 20:31, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hi - the current article seems to confuse casualties (wounded, killed and prisoners) with killed.  The 51st AIF certainly didn't lose 650 men KILLED at Mouquet Farm - the Official History for the first attack by the 51st on Mouquet Farm on 15 / 16 August records 301 casualties (Vol. 3 p. 770) and for the 3 September attack on Mouquet Farm records 378 casualties (Vol. 3, p. 858).  Nor did the 51st AIF lose 389 men KILLED at Villers-Bretonneux on 24 / 25 April 1918 - the Official History Vol. 5 page 637 says 365 casualties. An AIF Battalion at full strength was around 1080 men. I won't get into the discussion about lineage other than to say I don't agree with it but can understand the reasoning behind it.Harpooner1830 (talk) 07:35, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: G'day, thanks for pointing this out. I've adjust this now. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 07:57, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Casualties - WW1
Template talk:Hobart suburbs

message: New Norfolk is not a suburb of Hobart it is a locality in South East Tasmania. It is a fair way out of Hobart and shouldn't be included in this template. Kyle sb 13:00, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

message: So what about people who are not from Hobart? they would not know the difference when searching through wikipedia, If they want to find Abbotsfield, Tasmania, but dont know it lies under the Claremont, Tasmania page? I will most likely ignore who has written these comments and add them in anyway. Wiki ian 05:51, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Abbotsfield, Tasmania redirects to Claremont, Tasmania, and the same for all the other "non-suburbs", so anyone searching for it will find the information.  I didn't include them in the navbox because there are a huge about of links in there already - And, more importantly, because they are not suburbs! -- Chuq 08:38, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The following articles are intentionally not included in the navigational box as they are redirects to official suburbs

message: Heya all,
Cascades, Cornelian Bay, Abbotsfield, Springfield, Flagstaff Gully and Firthside are in italics in this template.  As far as I can see, there has been no indication why this is so, apart from the discussion here.  I'm boldly removing the apparently random formatting.
Oo-roo!--Shirt58 (talk) 13:44, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suburb names in italics 

message: Hi all.  I was thinking of adding this a WP:REDIRECT to Howrah, Tasmania, with the same rationale as the redirects for Lower Sandy Bay, Tasmania, Elwick, Tasmania and so on.  On looking into things further, it does not seem to be a locality within the suburb, but simply a commercial description of a housing subdivision in Howrah.  Boldly removed from template.  Should you wish to WP:TROUT me about this, I would request that you use a species mentioned in Gould's Book of Fish.  Hoping she'll be apples, ken oath, cobbers, The Moonah Hooner! (aka --Shirt58 (talk) 09:23, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[Glebe Hill, Tasmania]]"
Talk:Shootout at Lokhandwala

message: I have removed the 'this is a stub' template, as this page no longer appears to be a stub. Rohan2kool 12:05, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  No longer a stub 

message: This page has too much of copyright content (from http://www.mid-day.com/smd/play/2007/May/156781.htm). Not only is it copyrighted, its also unencyclopaedic and unreferenced. I am going to delete whatever I think needs to be deleted. arnie 05:50, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright content
Talk:Pramana

message: Please expand this article for other systems of Hindu philosophy. Babub 13:09, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: it might profit also to mention the meaning of Pramana in Buddhist philosophy, particularly in the work of Dignaga and Dharmakirti - I'll see what I can come up with in the latter regard.  What systems of Hindu philosophy in particular do you feel are lacking? Zero sharp 05:57, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Expand

message: Wakari07 (talk) 22:28, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Pramāṇa

message: The article lists Pratyakṣa, Anumāna, and Śabda as accepted by the Sankhya/Yoga school, and goes on to say they are enumerated in YS I.7. Thing is YS I.7 doesn't list Śabda, but Āgamāḥ. Can anybody enlighten me on the similarity or difference between these concepts?
--80.133.118.105 (talk) 13:58, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Śabda vs. Āgamāḥ 

message: Instead of Hinduism and buddhism which cant cover all, we should divide it(philosophies) into astika and nastika so in astika we should have orthodox philosophies (six major orthodox schools of vedic religion) and in nastika (sramanic) we should add buddhism, jainism, charvaka,ajivika and ajnana etc and we should add criticisms of pramanas tby ajanana and skeptic jayarasi bhatta too either in nastika panel or in a separate panel titled "criticism of pramanas " Mr.nothing anonymous (talk) 22:16, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Astika-nastika is a specific Hindu-term, not a general term for Indian philosophies. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 04:47, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

text: Yes, you are right, āstika and nāstika would be better. But where exactly in this page do you want the change? RavagingCare (talk) 17:34, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Astika and nastika is better way to divide Indian philosophies 

message: The proper translation of Pratyakṣa will be Evidence, not Perception. The word Pratyakṣa literally means in front of the eyes and Evidence literally means obvious to the eyes. The use of the word Evidence in modern science is similar to the use of the word Pratyakṣa in ancient times. Therefore I suggest that this change is made or at least both perception and evidence are simultaneously used to explain Pratyakṣa.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by RavagingCare (talk • contribs) 17:28, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation of Pratyakṣa
Talk:Huitzilihuitl

message: Partially related to the above discussion of a couple years ago now, I think that we could and should have some better or more direct sources in this article. Those given are more or less tertiary sources, ie are from a generalist high-level historical perspective only. Any info they do contain on this period would've been drawn from more specific Aztec scholarship sources; there are a few of these around will see abt identifying couple of those here. --cjllw ʘ TALK 01:31, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 
Talk:Northport, Door County, Wisconsin

message: There seems to be another Northport, Wisconsin in Waupaca County, just west of New London.  -Acjelen 13:12, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Other Northport, Wisconsin

message: I believe that the mention of a restaurant and ATM should be removed from the article. The information may fit better on an equivalent article on WikiVoyage (Door County maybe?).  and  -- you have edited this article in the past and are closer to that part of Wisconsin than I am. Any thoughts? -- Dolotta (talk) 18:43, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure why there's an article at all.  Except, of course, that I created it.  Maybe there was a redline link on the Wisconsin Highway 42 article that I wanted to fix.  But it's going to be a very boring article if all it has is a highway terminus and a ferry dock.  You're going to take the heart and soul of Northport out if you remove the ATM and the public restroom. --Acjelen (talk) 01:35, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I actually think this is a decent article overall. There are plenty of Wisconsin location articles, like Hay Creek, Wisconsin for example, that are smaller that this one and work perfectly well. I would guess that the heart and soul of Northport is probably the ferry dock. I can think of only five ferries off the top of my head that operate in Wisconsin. -- Merrimac, Bayfield, Cassville, Washington Island, and Manitowoc. -- Dolotta (talk) 02:25, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: There's not much to mention about this tiny corner of the world, so I suppose it should be kept. But it should be verified by a reliable source. I would normally comment to remove it but there isn't much potential for content. Royalbroil 02:43, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll add a picture of the harbor to make it seem more relevant.  Fondycardinals (talk) 23:39, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restaurant/ATM Mention
Talk:Shutdown

message: The section on the use of "shutdown" in computers needs to cover more then just Unix. Both the Mac and the PC have a "Shutdown" feature though in XP it's refered to as "Turn Off Computer...". This section should mention why your supposed "Shutdown" via the operating system rather just turning of the machine in operating system like Mac OS Classic, OS X, Win9X, NT, 2000, and XP. --Cab88 13:13, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There is in the Windows XP command prompt a command called shutdown as well. HymylyT@C 13:37, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

text: I added a paragraph about the Windows shutdown dialog and command. Someone needs to add something about other operating systems, like MacOS. — Loadmaster 16:34, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Unfortunately, illiteracy tends to spread like a virus: use of the term shutdowning is becoming more popular among computer admin types, as this simple Google search shows. Sheesh. — Loadmaster 14:18, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shutdowning 

message: The sections of this article are probably large enough to be split off into their own separate articles, especially the computers and nuclear reactors sections. — Loadmaster 02:27, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split this article 

message: To my knowledge, the phrase used isn't "shut down", but "shot down", an equivalent of "pwned", signifying that someone has been trumped.  "Shut up" would be a phrase applicable to the situation described in the article, but doesn't refer to the meaning given.  ~GMH talk to me 03:22, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "shut down" in slang
Talk:United States Strategic Bombing Survey

message: This article is confusing in that it stats the USSBS was created by Hap Arnold in one paragraph, and in the very next it stats it was created by Henry Stimson of the War Department at the request of President Roosevelt,  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maxq32 (talk • contribs) 10:25, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who formed the USSBS?
Talk:List of Bahamians

message: there needs to be more info on the speech of bahamians. Gringo300 21:57, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was no move. -- tariqabjotu (joturner) 23:37, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: speech

message: :Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
*Oppose. This is barely useful as a portal, and contains information taht could be easily handled in Demographics of the Bahamas and either a List of notable Bahamians section in The Bahamas or, if large enough, a breakout of that article as List of notable people from the Bahamas to be compatible with category naming standards. --Dhartung | Talk 06:06, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:List of Sydney's 10 tallest skyscrapers

message: As for the merge, i say delete this page.  The information in Skyscrapers in Sydney is more accurate and more extensive.  It's interesting that both pages were created by the same editor. --Merbabu 13:40, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Redirected, as a first step Steve 00:35, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Second Great Fire of London

message: :Image:StPaulsCathedral.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
— Save_Us_229 22:10, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:StPaulsCathedral.jpg

message: I have uploaded an image of the Mason photograph again and linked to it. It seems the previous image was deleted because no rationale had been provided, not because the rationale was invalid. Thincat (talk) 14:34, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Herbert Mason Photograph 

message: Why is there a picture of Warsaw at the bottom of the page ?
ThePro (talk) 22:24, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Warsaw picture ? 

message: The quoted figures don't add up - 136 bombers with an average of 180 bombs per plane doesn't make up 100,000 bombs but a quarter of that number. Geopersona (talk) 12:10, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I immediately noticed that as well. Would be good to fix. Not logged in from work and don't have new sources to cite, so not editing the main article text -- Martin L Buchanan. 65.126.101.58 (talk) 21:45, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of bombs 

message: Y is fire bigger then the other fire 90.214.245.147 (talk) 18:52, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evie mea
Talk:Márcio Nobre

message: probably he will be the top scorer in the next season
:someone added this comment here in summer. now its clear that he can't be the top scorer because he only scored "1" goal in this season. with respect, Deliogul 23:19, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled