lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Telephone numbers in Taiwan

message: In the late 1970s, the Republic of China (Taiwan) was accessible, at least from the United States, using country code +86.  It may be that the Carter administration's change of diplomatic recognition to Beijing resulted in the People's Republic of China insisting that calls using +86 must route to the mainland.  At this point, it was probably necessary to use a different code for the island of Taiwan, and therefore, unofficial use of +886, which for many years the ITU did not list as assigned, but only as "reserved", probably an unofficial acknowledgment that it was being used by at least some countries to enable direct dialing of the democratic portion of China. GBC (talk) 02:35, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: "Officially", Taiwan is assigned +86 plus city code 6. The current use of +886 is a "hack", so called.  Shalom S. (talk) 23:04, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I first saw lists of international dialing codes for some 30-40 countries in an AT&T advertisement in an issue of National Geographic in the late 1970s. ROC was shown as 011-86 plus codes for some of the cities below. Not 866, just 86. It was some years later when I discovered the country was changed to 886, which is suggestive of 86 but "dial-around" using one of the unused 88X codes. (Bangladesh has the only other country-specific 88X code.) Guantanamo Bay in the 80s had a dial-around code of 5399, usable from the U.S. from which it was impossible to dial the rest of Cuba, but using the 53 code as if it were a four-digit country code. I could wonder if Cuba had an area code of 99 for some place in the country that would end up overriding if the U.S. ever could dial Cuba generally!  That led me to wonder if the Canal Zone had a special dial-around code in the 1970s to let Americans dial Canal Zone exchanges, e.g. 50799 plus the Canal Zone phone number, except that there was not, between the U.S. and Panama, the same level of animosity as between the U.S. and Cuba. GBC (talk) 22:27, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: https://www.facebook.com/help/1540345696275090/?helpref=uf_share 116.212.185.17 (talk) 10:01, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was not always +886 

message: Hello I was editing the page Telephone numbers in Taiwan and the after using the visual editor. previewed the page using the preview function but after saving changes the information keep glitching with the tables either disappearing or in the wrong place. Was trying to correct errors in the numbering plans to mirror the Chinese Wikipedia entry,since it seems to be more accurate.  Any ways to solve this issue? Thanks.66.214.169.209 (talk) 05:09, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trying to add and correct prefixes regarding telephone numbering format using visual editor and the page keeps ending up glitching or with jibberish. 

message: The map of Taiwan pictured in this page is incorrect. Taiwan is a small island, here is picture as entire China mainland 2604:3D08:7F7F:6890:90FB:8059:661A:FC7E (talk) 10:49, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong map
Talk:Henry Arthur Herbert

message: We tend to dab by personal name only, rather than full name including middle name. Having 2 dabs, one for Henry Herbert and one for Henry Arthur Herbert there's a clear risk of people not finding what they're looking for, or not finding it easily, even with the 'see also'. Also, there are hardly so many Henry Herberts that a separate dab for  those who share a middle name as well is necessary. Boleyn3 (talk) 21:16, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal
Talk:Social Democratic Party of Kyrgyzstan

message: Some more information regarding the nature (e.g.: leftist, centralist, etc) of the party would be helpful. Children of the dragon (talk) 06:53, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Okay some more information please? 
Talk:2007 Kyrgyz parliamentary election

message: According to the CIA World Factbook, Kyrgyzstani (not Kyrgyz is the official denonym (LINK). This is because the government of Kyrgystan distinguishes between ethnicity and nationality (Kyrgyz is 64.9% of Kyrgystan). HouChangMao (talk) 21:20, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official denonym is '''Kyrgyzstsani'''
Talk:People's Democratic Party of Uzbekistan

message: Removed no citations tag, as I fixed the broken links and added recent information on the party which cites other links. The infobox claims ideology is centre-right but used to be socialist. This quite sudden shift should probably be elaborated on/cite info on party's current ideology. From what I can tell, I would not label them centre-right, perhaps Third Way centre.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexmunger (talk • contribs) 08:24, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Abdullah ibn Husayn al-Ahmar

message: Who and when was the common ancestor of this man and the President of Yemen Ali Abdullah Saleh Al-Ahmar on the direct paternal line?  СЛУЖБА (talk) 21:31, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Answering myself. They're from two different Al-Ahmar families, although both from the same Hashed tribe. --YOMAL SIDOROFF-BIARMSKII (talk) 02:06, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Common ancestor with the President.
Talk:Pas-ta'ai

message: Should this article be deleted? There are no sources and the whole artile is one sentence. We can also move this article to another article, possibly to Saisiyat people.--AsadalEditor (talk) 12:05, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I have found something and corrected/added the content with the reference.--AsadalEditor (talk) 18:43, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion? (or move) 

message: "Other theories purport that the "Little People" could be African slaves brought by European merchants during the 1600s. Letters sent by Dutch traders visiting Taiwan in the 1600s mention the existence of "short people" on the island.[1]". 
Maybe this should be included for completeness, however it has since been very clear that the DNA of the Negritos left Africa 50,000 years ago. For instance the Andaman Islanders have mtDNA haplogroup M32. M1 was the first to evolve from L3. L are the oldest mtDNA haplogroups. 2001:1C00:1E20:D900:E41D:5620:598D:2C45 (talk) 12:58, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced slavery theory
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aviation/Peer review

message: A-class review instructions say that an article only gets 4 days for review. Do we consider revising? There aren't enough people involved in reviewing right now. Perhaps we post a notice on the Project and task force talk pages? --Born2flie (talk) 03:31, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I aggree. I changed it to 'a sufficient time' for now, until it gets more active here. - Trevor MacInnis (Contribs) 16:02, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aviation Peer Review 

message: Hello, I have sumbitted the Powered hang glider article for peer review. I'd like to hear feedback in order to raise its quality status from B-Class to A-Class. Thanks!BatteryIncluded (talk) 16:15, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Powered hang glider

message: I know WP:Aviation mirrored the WP:MILHIST peer review process, but I wonder if a process similar to the GA-Class review process might work better. The review takes place on the article's talk page, and becomes a part of the history of that article, rather than an out of sight process that is often neglected. It might also entice more editors to take part if they see it happen more often, and each review becomes an ad hoc advertisement for the process. Just some thoughts. --Born2flie (talk) 14:45, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New process 

message: Not sure what has happened here. I followed the procedure for adding a PR request, and whilst the note shows, the title doesn't. Anyone able to help?--FactotEm (talk) 17:13, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind. Idiot at the keyboard here. --FactotEm (talk) 17:22, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer review request for [[General aviation in the United Kingdom]] 

message: Since the bot is not updating Template:WPAVIATION Announcements now, can we list the GA reviews in a section on the pee review page, say below the "Non-article featured content candidates" section?  Thanks. -Fnlayson (talk) 21:55, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: As pointed out by User:Nimbus227, the announcements template data comes from WP:WikiProject Aviation/Article alerts and can be updated manually. So adding GA reviews on this page is not that critical.  Thanks. -Fnlayson (talk) 13:13, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good Article nominations section 

message: Imperial Gift is currently under review as a Featured Article Candidate. The two reviewers who have weighed in so far are not topic specialists on military or aviation topics. The article covers events in a number of British Empire countries in the immediate post First World War period. The British government donated large numbers of aircraft and related equipment to Australia, Canada, New Zealand, South Africa and India. The donations led to the foundation of four national Air Forces. I am the nominator of the FAC and the major contributor to the article. (This request for assistance has also been posted to WikiProject Military History.) Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 16:23, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wanted - a topic specialist for a FAC review
Talk:Hard Disk 20

message: The picture's captions are incorrect.  "Dimensions" should be "Casing."  Wcrlewis (talk) 14:54, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Mr. Brown Coffee

message: I’m interesting to mr brown coffe Zarina1995 (talk) 23:56, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hi 

message: Hi I’m interested to your mr brown coffee Zarina1995 (talk) 23:59, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hi 

message: Best coffee 94.79.94.136 (talk) 17:11, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mr Brown is the best coffee no cap 🧢❌
Talk:Mark Antony De Wolfe Howe (writer)

message: I don't think anything in the current version is invalid. I added the "chessplayer-stub" as a joke once, partly out of frustration with how older figures in the literary world get ignored here. M. A. DeWolfe is very much not a joke and deserves an article. Some of his papers can be found here and his works were reviewed by Time Magazine.--T. Anthony 06:48, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I didn't propose this merge, but I support it. If there are not objections (and there really ought not to be, since this is obviously necessary), I'll go ahead with the merger myself. --Aepoutre (talk) 15:04, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No comments for over 48 hours and, as I said, there really oughtn't be any objections to such a simple and obviously necessary merger. I'm going ahead with it as of this moment. --Aepoutre (talk) 01:35, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: I'm working on another article, in which the person is related to all the Mark Antony De Wolfe Howes. There are three: a bishop, his son and grandson, both of the latter of whom were writers.
This article seems to conflate the two in a couple of spots, and should be separated. (There is no Wikipedia article on the grandson).
The first Mark Antony de Wolf Howe, a bishop, has his own Wikipedia page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Antony_De_Wolfe_Howe_(bishop)
He married 3 times and had 18 (!) children, two of whom were also named Mark Antony De Wolfe Howe (one died as a child).
The one who survived to adulthood was Mark Antony DeWolfe Howe, b. 28 Aug 1864, d. 6 Dec 1960 (Mark Antony DeWolfe Howe, b. 28 Aug 1864, d. 6 Dec 1960)
This is the problematic article which seems to conflate the son and grandson.
The second Mark Antony DeWolfe Howe  (1864-1960) had a son, also called Mark De Wolfe Howe (1906-1967), who was also a writer.
The elder Howe won the Pulitzer Prize in 1925, which is not mentioned in this article. 
The current article should be vetted to make sure all the work attributed was by Howe the father, and not Howe the son.
Kathleen Warnock (kwarnockny)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kwarnockny (talk • contribs) 17:19, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  I think this article may have been improperly merged
Talk:Sting (disambiguation)

message: Most, if not all references to Sting (including the one right on top of this page) go straight to the wrestler instead of the musician. Even on the articles relating to The Police, it goes to the wrestler. I'm a wikinoob, but I'm just pointing it out. 68.92.212.143 (talk) 03:46, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for pointing this out. You are correct, there is a problem here, resulting from page moves of the last few days. I will try and sort it out, but I can see it may be contentious. CIreland (talk) 05:31, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Thomas J. McCormick

message: I am interested to work on this, introduction and a more developed piece about McCormick's work. I don't have the time right now but I will come back to it soonest!
==== See also ====
Giovanni Arrighi
--Henri (talk) 20:01, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction 

message: Giovanni Arrighi
--Henri (talk) 20:01, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  See also
Talk:Snice

message: I could find no reliable references for the use of the term snice for a shaved ice-like dessert using milk instead of water ice. There are many references, though none meeting WP:RS, describing a dessert made of shaved, frozen milk topped with red beans, fruit, etc. These can be found with a Google search for taiwan +frozen milk shaved ice. These references describe that  dessert formerly a part of this article under Other uses, but none uses the term snice. I removed the section referring to snice as a Taiwanese frozen dessert and removed the related categories. That dessert is better described as part of the Shaved ice article or, at an editor's choice, in a separate article. Geoff T C  22:08, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed unreferenced use of term for a Taiwanese dessert
Talk:Nami Tamaki Discography

message: Now I have been watching this page and helping to moderate it as much as I can, and ever since I started, I have wondered why this page has been made separate from the main source! Now if you ask me, this article/section should be merged back into the main article. It only makes sense; why have 2 pages for the same relation of article when you could simply have everything on one simple page where it is easily accessible?
I will leave this request for someone to do for a week and a bit. If there is no further discussion or no one merges this within that one week and a bit time limit, I shall do the merge myself. AnthonyWalters (talk) 04:00, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree on the merge. Udonknome (talk) 11:54, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge Proposal
Template talk:RLM aircraft designations

message: The Do 25 and 27 were not designed until well after the RLM had ceased to exist. Heinkel HD and HE (capitalized) designations were internal company designations, often for types that were never used by the Germans, nor were they ever given an equivalent RLM designation. Hence why I removed them. - NiD.29 (talk) 16:49, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: While Heinkel's company designations were HD and HE, the aircraft included in this template were also allocated RLM designations, all of which had the prefix He.  As for the Do 25 and 27, RLM reserved 8-25 and 8-27 for Dornier, but the designations were not used before the war ended.  I clarified this by putting subscript 3 next to the designation. - ZLEA T\C 16:58, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not every German aircraft designation was an RLM designation 

message: I doubt if the RLM designation of the Junkers A 35 is Ju 53. Is there a source for this?  I did not find it. There is also no mention of it in Junkers A 35. Thanks for your answer, Davv69 (talk) 03:50, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll check my library for sources.  If I find anything, I'll add it to the article.  The designation might have been the RLM designation of the K 53, a Swedish variant of the A 35. - ZLEA T\C 04:40, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

text: The only source in my library to mention the Ju 53 lists it as a "twin-engined reconnaissance aircraft".  This does not match the A 35, which was a single-engined aircraft.  Based on this, I think it's safe to assume the association between the A 35 and the Ju 53 designation is in error. - ZLEA T\C 21:00, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:   Junkers A 35 = Ju 53 ?
Talk:Barista (company)

message: Barista Coffee is one of India's most popular coffee brands. Barista is to India what Starbucks is be to the US. Google should put any doubts to rest. The article has seen some spamming from anonymous IPs, which I've removed. If anyone still feels the article needs to be deleted, please go through AfD.--thunderboltz(TALK) 04:45, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Contesting Speedy deletion

message: I believe the Taiwanese "Barista Coffee" is unrelate to the Indian Barista Coffee that described in this article....luuva  (talk) 14:08, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Barista Coffee of Taiwan

message: Both of these are only slightly altered versions of what is on the website.  Either they should be changed (philosophy could probably be a quote if someone wanted to do that) or the sections should be deleted.  They aren't written in an encyclopedic tone.  Experience is unique to every visitor.  Maybe it could be changed to atmosphere and it could describe the typical set up for the locations. Dreambeaver (talk) 20:56, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Philosophy and Experience 

message: I have no idea where the $1bn USD asset value figure comes from in the toolbar. I think it is a misunderstanding of the company's most recent M&A transaction -- it was acquired for 1bn INR (~$16.4m US at the time). Obviously that's a far cry from a billion dollars. Also, this might be pedantic, but a company's valuation often ≠ its 'asset value' (which could be taken to mean a lot of different things).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.140.194.82 (talk) 16:14, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Numbers way off in bar on the right

message: Bangladesh 27.54.148.190 (talk) 14:08, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bangladesh 
Talk:Philip Van Doren Stern

message: A couple months ago, here, User:EEng undid my edit. I had added a comma before a nonrestrictive clause, stating in my edit summary "this relative clause is nonrestrictive". In undoing my edit, Eeng stated in the edit summary "actually it's restrictive".
This is the sentence in question:
:Philip Van Doren Stern (September 10, 1900 – July 31, 1984) was an American author, editor, and Civil War historian whose story The Greatest Gift, published in 1943, inspired the classic Christmas film It's a Wonderful Life (1946).
I added a comma just before "whose".
Without the comma, the sentence implyies that there also is another "American author, editor, and Civil War historian whose story The Greatest Gift, published in 1943, inspired the classic Christmas film It's a Wonderful Life (1946). The trouble is that there was not also another such person: there was only one—namely, Philip Van Doren Stern.
We can have
* "the" and a restrictive clause (he was the American author (and so on) whose story The Greatest Gift (and so on))
* or "a" and a nonrestrictive clause (unless there was more than one such person—which there wasn't).
I'm putting the comma back.
President Lethe (talk) 19:36, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry but I've taken it out again. English is not a programming langauge. See . EEng 21:20, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comma before nonrestrictive clause
Talk:Robert M. Utley

message: I put some info in this section, all sourced from that Public Historian article, but I don't have access to the full article, just the first page. Would someone with full JSTOR access be so kind as to expand that section? —BorgHunter  (talk) 04:37, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early life and education section 

message: The following text has been removed from the Lede and transferred here: 
The only sources to be found are those which mimic Wikipedia (over 4,000 of them).  A reliable source for this claim has not been found.  Until it is, this should stay on the talk page and not be transferred back to the article. – PAINE ELLSWORTH CLIMAX! 23:31, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed text from Lede
Talk:The Westin at Tulsa Garden Square

message: As of May, 2011. I cannot find any indication that the proposed Westin at Tulsa Garden Square has ever been started, let alone completed. The application for city approval was denied in 2008, according to an article in the Tulsa World. I question whether this is still an appropriate article for Wikipedia and recommend its deletion. Bruin2 (talk) 16:16, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Candidate for deletion?
Talk:Anders Winroth

message: This professor apparently did an early version of (webcite) the education program. It would be interesting to hear anything more about this class or what happened to the materials produced by the class. (and how were they licensed? peer reviewed/edited?) There was also another history class running around the same time and at the same school which had students editing Wikipedia itself as a class assignment. --Jeremyb (talk) 15:33, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  He did an early incarnation of education program (but not on wikipedia)
Talk:Bagdad, Tamaulipas

message: Check out the Matamoros, Tamaulipas under the History section, on the American Civil War. I provided several creditable citations, where the port of Bagdad is mentioned. This can help cite things here, too. ComputerJA (talk) 01:22, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations for this article 

message: This author refers to Bagdad as a "mushroom city." I don't know if that's meant literally or what.  --MopTop (talk) 13:26, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mushroom city?  

message: The article needs inline citations (I’ve added the appropriate template). It also utilizes a non-encyclopedic tone (ie the reference to “the sands of time”). Needs fairly major work. --Michael.j.champlin (talk) 14:58, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  No inline citations, colloquial language used 

message: — Assignment last updated by DAgatep1 (talk) 02:44, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Fall 2023 HIST 401

message: Forgive for saying this but I feel like this article had more information in the “History” section AnonymousUser176 (talk) 02:34, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  What happened?
Talk:Excitor

message: It was unclear to me whether the article was about the vessel (at the time of last edit Excitor II) or about the tourist experience operated by the vessels over the years.  To solve this I have added headings for each of the vessels, using existing article content, plus a new reference source for the Excitor III.  
Essentially this means that the article is now primarily about the experience although it includes information about the vessels used to provide the experience.  Hopefully I have made things clearer with this change.Matrixmania (talk) 00:57, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Vessels

message: Since the referenced accident occurred onboard Excitor I, I have made this a sub-section under Excitor I rather than a section of its own.  Have there been any other accidents on other vessels?Matrixmania (talk) 00:57, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Accidents
Wikipedia talk:No original research (draft rewrite 5th December 2004 to 5th February 2005)/Archive 1

message: Maureen,
Moved the draft to the project page. So discussion of it can take place here. :ChrisG 12:11, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC)

message: Today I created User:Maurreen/Basic topics to list a small selection of core topics. Wikipedia talk:Pushing to 1.0and other pages in :Category:Editorial validation might be appropriate for Apwoolrich 's concerns. Maurreen 00:40, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tangent on standards