Talk:Estrella Damm

message: This article talk page was automatically added with  banner as it falls under :Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 04:54, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:FOOD|WikiProject Food and drink]] Tagging

message: The picture presumably shows a can from UK or Down Under, the ones sold in Spain look different (see here).--84.150.216.115 (talk) 10:07, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: Hi i removed some advertising edits, but someone added it back in.  this has to be a neutral article not a promotions for the beer.  Please discuss this.--Bad edits r dumb (talk) 22:07, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I happened to come across this page by accident.  The page is fine as it is, please read WP:NOTADVERTISING --5 albert square (talk) 22:16, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

text: OK, well for future reference Bad edits r dumb, if you find peacock terms in an article then you can re-word the article yourself instead of just deleting most of it.  Kind of like I've just done now.  You could have also tagged for it to be checked for neutrality, again like I've just done.  Both of those would have been much better for the article than deleting most of it --5 albert square (talk) 22:41, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I think what u did is fine, but i do not agree that trying to reword the marketing language is the best approach.  what you have done is left the vast majority of what the advertiser has added to the article about how great the beer is, but u have changed a word here and there.  I think u have made a minor improvement, but i still think none of that info belongs.  but this is just a difference of opinions.--Bad edits r dumb (talk) 22:47, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm aware I only re-worded a sentence.  That's why I've tagged for it to be checked for neutrality - someone else will check the remainder of the article --5 albert square (talk) 22:57, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: As bad as his grammar is I agree with Bad Edits. It's better we have a stub of an article or even no article than one filled with promotional language, puffery and blatantly untrue statements. Defteratalk 13:43, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I just visited the Estrella website and almost all of the article as it is currently is ripped off from there. Yesterday a red named user blanked the article and replaced it with blatant promotional language, he also created the Estrella sailing team page which was also copied from the site. Defteratalk 13:57, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This is wut i suspect all along. it was language written from the company, this is why i knew it didnt belong. thank u for doing the right thing Deftera, you are a good editor.--Bad edits r dumb (talk) 18:45, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding advertising language 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:18, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion