Talk:SAP ERP

message: Since I have been redirected from mySAP to this page I would have expected at least to find the word in the article. Unfortunately, this is not the case ... --82.135.125.90 08:25, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  mySAP 

message: * A previous version of this page was proposed for deletion based on based on "Unreferenced and unsourced article about a non-notable software package: a non-consumer commercial product, described non-neutrally and in advertising style as a 'solution'". Was resolved at the time as "do not delete", and most of the content has since been overhauled.  -- JetheroTalk 02:35, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Deletion (19 February 2008) 

message: I propose that SAP GUI be merged into this article as a subheading relating to SAP ERP, as it's kind of not terribly useful as an article by itself. [ roux ] [x] 08:58, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal from [[SAP GUI]] 

message: Hi,
Both article seem to share the same subject matter and may benefit from being merged.
Ghaag (talk) 01:42, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The products have significant differences, so I advise keeping the two entries separate. Crysb (talk) 17:41, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger with [[SAP_R/3]] 

message: I haven't studied the previous version that was proposed for deletion, but the current version definitely contains some advertisment-like language and suspicious material, and looks strange to me as a whole. Some examples:
* "SAP ERP systems effectively implemented can have huge cost benefits." has no encyclopedic value
* some sections appear to be duplicate (e.g. "Benefits of SAP ERP" and "Advantages and disadvantages of SAP ERP")
* half of the references are to the same book
* "Deployment and maintenance costs" says nothing about the costs of deploying SAP ERP  —Preceding unsigned comment added by TinyFirstman (talk • contribs) 15:41, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Looked at this article and rewrote/removed much of the content in question. Should read much better now, but still requires the addition of multiple references. Crysb (talk) 17:40, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Rewriting (11 August 2009) 

message: The section marked for tone sounds like an advertisement, not encyclopedic.  And it needs citations of companies touting the benefits.
Crasshopper (talk) 03:20, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Integration 

message: I made some changes to the paragraph where SAP ERP had been described in advertising style  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.240.244.161 (talk) 16:29, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just edited the "advertising-style" paragraph a bit 

message: Ummmm... can *anyone* do anything about this?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.89.174.132 (talk) 14:43, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mein Gott, this is a terrible article 

message: Definition of the scope of SAP ERP needs more work: the current definition is incomplete. Rather than make up the scope from memory this should be taken from original SAP literature.
109.145.136.140 (talk) 20:29, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scope of SAP ERP 

message: The infobox contains an unsupported statement that the initial release of SAP was in 1972. The "official" company history says they started the company in 1972 and had software in 1975.   (talk) 11:45, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  1972