Talk:Khalistan

message: The section on the 182 incident states that 329 Canadian civilians were killed. This is incorrect as the nationalities of all 329 victims were not Canadian.
Nordrassor (talk) 04:09, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Casualty count incorrect

message: Hello,
Why is there no sections on the following:
Culture
Economy
Demographics
Education
Flora and Fauna
The proposed currency
and many other sections?
Mik357 (talk) 20:49, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Serious overhaul and expansion needed

message: Investigate and Prosecute Perpetrators of ‘Disappearances’ and Killings
Human Rights Watch Report
 
(Delhi, October 18, 2007) – The Indian government must take concrete steps to hold accountable members of its security forces who killed, “disappeared,” and tortured thousands of Sikhs during its counterinsurgency campaign in the Punjab, Human Rights Watch and Ensaaf said in a new report released today.
Response:
If you were not around at the time please either stop fabricating things or listing articles based solely on propaganda, please present the facts.
Response;
So you call Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch 'fabricating evidence', even the Indian Media use them as a source of information. These organisations are respected worldwide, obviously the truth hurts.There will be justice for the Sikh killed.
Response from third member;
Do we even have to show facts? India didn't allow any news reporters in India during this time, isn't that enough? Fabricating evidence? There are enough evidence of personal eye-witness stories of older women in India stating how there daughter got raped or there husband was burned with a tire around there neck.  As for propoganda, India is an embarrassement, stating that "Hindus were scared that Sikhs might hurt them in response".  India is a joke of a nation, they need a political change as soon as possible.
Response from fourth member;
Dear Friend,
In india there are 87 crore hindus today..81% of total population. So we dont need to be scared by any minority. Sikhs r only 2% of total population..y we scared from them? please advice me.
Other thing, in 84 5000 sikhs were killed..and there were hindus who saved a lots of sikhs..if they wont at that time..u will find 10000 more dead bodies in delhi only..so before telling hindus think wat u r saying..hindus r those who saved life of sikhs...Because India is democracy..u can start khalistan movement ..becoz india is secular u can tell india joke..try to do it in pakistan or china..next second u will be killed by the dictactor..so respect wat u got..India is for all..Hindus r very nice ..otherwise u wont find urself alive in India.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.106.1.34 (talk) 15:50, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: India: Time to Deliver Justice for Atrocities in Punjab

message: Here you will see footage of the BBC report of Khalisthan Religious violence
You can't spell. Why have you missed out the Indians killing Sikhs in 1984?
Because the violence began with religious sikh fanatics killing innocent women and children who were non-sikh, and i stress again the word 'began' 
What about your fanatics they stated killing minorities from 1947 and are still doing it Gujarat 2003 , aoydhya etc ,1978, 1984 attacks on Sikhs are examples, attacks on Sikhs started then even though they had saved thousands of hindus during partition and before. During non violent demonstations in the 60's even Sikh children were killed by a communal police force, so learn some history before coming out with rubbish. Again in the Pakistan wars and China it was the Sikhs the Indian Government begged for help when your own soldiers ran away.You lot would have starved to death if it was not for the wheat from the Punjab  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Singhls (talk • contribs) 06:42, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: BBC Coverage of Sikh Violence against Non Sikhs

message: I want that the admins semi-protect this page... Because there are too many pov edits by ips like 91.192.59.145. Please do as soon as possible. Sunnybondsinghjalwehra (talk) 16:01, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: SEMI-PROTECT

message: I've semi-protected this page for 1 week, as some users are indulging in unnecessary revert wars. Also, please use this page to discuss issues related to the article, not to badmouth Hindus or Sikhs. Wikipedia is not a chat room. utcursch | talk 07:51, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected 

message: People need to be held accountable for terror in the Punjab belonging to the Congress party as stated by the BJP. The BJP also state that Congress created the LTTE of Sri Lanka.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/BJP_rallies_behind_Advani_hits_back_at_Congress/articleshow/2901845.cms  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Singhls (talk • contribs) 19:17, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Congress Party Involvement in Terrorism

message: Why was the etymology of the word Khalistan removed? Khalistan is derived from the Arabic word khaalis خالص (pure) and the Persian word stan ستان (land).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.75.246.80 (talk) 05:47, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of Etymology? 

message: The unverified tag has been up since late 2007.  The article now has 17 footnotes, most of them from reputable sources.  Does anyone object to removing the "unverified" tag?  Sections of this article may be prone to NPOV issues, but at least there are a goodly number of cited references. MatthewVanitas (talk) 05:43, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of "unverified" tag?

message: Hi, I and one of my fellow editors are facing a deadlock on a issue of bias on a controversial topic Operation Blue Star, the summary of dispute can be found at , please let us know your views so that we can solve the dispute amicably. Thanks LegalEagle (talk) 02:02, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Op blue star help 

message: "  This culminated in the bombing of [[Air India Flight 182 in which 329 people were killed."
* Khalistan Alive In Sikh-Canadian Hearts and Minds,The Globe and Mail, Mississauga, Ontario, Mar. 17, 2005, By ROBERT MATAS
I am very very dubious of this statement.  It needs sourcing, and more than sikhtimes.  Link dead.- sinneed (talk) 00:06, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link, very broad statement, cutting. 

message: Any statement about a Living Person must meet the requirements in wp:BLP, whether the article as a whole is about the individual or about anything else.  For example, an article about dogfood might claim that an individual endorsed the dogfood.  BLP would apply.  I have cut an entire section that did not meet wp:BLP, as it accused various persons of acting as lobbyists for the cause of Khalistan.  One is free to speak for something, or for people involved in something, without being a "lobbyist" for that cause.- sinneed (talk) 23:42, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remember [[wp:BLP]] applies to STATEMENTs not ARTICLES. 

message: "The Khalistan movement is now widely seen as a smaller scale separatist movement by some Sikh youth in Canada, the US and the UK. Sikh separatists 'funded from UK', BBC"
That is not what the source says, at all.  If this rests on the body, it should not be tagged to that source.
- sinneed (talk) 12:43, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cut to talk for possible inclusion.