lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Chamarajendra Academy of Visual Arts

message: :Chamarajendra Academy of Fine Arts reply to possible-delete. While I am not the best person to write about this topic, I chanced upon the absence of this article, when I wanted to find more information about it. Someone who is into the fine arts from the region might be better able to better expand the article that in a way that it merits.(I'm a tasteless engineer). Here, I intend to justify that this article is not about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, that is not noteworthy.  Mysore City is primararily a tourist destination, and amongst several things to visit, this academy is like a small museum, one of the things someone into the arts would check out while touring the city. It has some historical significance, as it was first started by a local pre-independence ruler. It also gets involved in local fair ground activities(exhibitions) and local festivities(like Dasara). Like many pre-independence royal assets, it now is owned and supported by the government; which is actually part of the reason why there isn't much information floating around on the web about it, as I mentioned in my edit-comment, I just quickly pooled information together.  so I don't think there is any private interest here. The intention is to create a stub. Instead of deletion, I suggest that the article be marked for as stub/encyclopediac rewrite, so that someone-else who chances upon it and finds it having insufficient content may expand upon it. At this point I feel its better than no article at all. Even better, consult or push responsibility onto somebody(that could be yourself too if you are into these things) who is following whats going on in the arts in the area and do as their opinion. I'm located in Syr,NY so I don't think I can get a picture or anything. In the mean time I will try and see what I can do. -- Hgkamath 18:25, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Is it C. Academy of Fine Arts (CAFA) or Academy of Visual Arts (CAVA)??? The article should be moved if the title is incorrect, or the beginning of the article amended. -- AirOdyssey (Talk) 12:51, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chamarajendra Academy of Visual Arts 
Talk:The Slammer

message: I believe that List of contestants in the Slammer should be merged with this page, it surves no purpose on its, especially as this page is very small. It should be fine on here. Gran2 18:26, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: I have just been to a recording in Elstree Studios, not the one in East London. Either that reference is wrong, or they moved production for the current series. 
Aug 2010  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.79.167.115 (talk) 18:54, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recording location.
Talk:EMD DH1

message: Is this article correctly named? While it is shown as DHI on page 128 of Pinkepank, in the index on page 456 it is listed as DH1, which would make more sense - Diesel Hydraulic One. Iain Bell (talk) 13:11, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: What I suspect is that the 'I' is being used as the Roman numeral for the number one.  More sources are probably needed to find which nomenclature was used by EMD, or indeed whether both were. Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 22:26, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Correct Name
Talk:Llanarmon-yn-Iâl

message: I have re-written to remove the chatty style.  Can the style warning banner now be removed? Daniel Longhurst (talk) 23:41, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tone & Style 
Talk:Storm King School

message: Just curious as to what exactly should be cited, here.  The existence of Storm King Academy? Predshockey17 08:42, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  What third party independent source can back up what is stated?  Gillyweed 08:57, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This article seems to closely follow whole sections of  and is close enough that I considered a   tag on the article. Please rewrite or even paraphrase in own words. V. Joe (talk) 22:59, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :Walks like a duck.....
76.250.61.86 (talk) 14:38, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: "Reads like an advertisement"
Talk:Thomas Britton

message: Nice article - one question though: is "small coal" an alternative term for charcoal or is "small coal-man" referring to the size of the business? It reads strangely - seems like he was a little man who sold coal. Yomanganitalk 18:37, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Your first suggestion is correct, "small coal" was the then-current name for charcoal. Warofdreams talk 19:00, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:Educationist stubs

message: This category is not based on correct English usage. There should probably be a category for educationist stubs and another for educator stubs.  Piccadilly 18:43, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've listed it for discusssion at WP:SFD - feel free to make any comments there. Grutness...wha? 23:33, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Amantes Sunt Amentes

message: *http://translate.google.co.uk/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cronica.com.mx%2Fnota.php%3Fid_nota%3D273256&sl=es&tl=en&hl=en
PhilKnight (talk) 23:00, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Machine translation of Spanish language reference
Talk:1969 Pacific hurricane season

message: It's a high start, but three things are needed. First, there's no inline sources in the article. Second, be careful for the units. For the speed for NHC basin seasons, it should be mph (with km/h conversion in parenthesis), and for measurment it should be imperial units (with metric conversion in parenthesis). We're trying to avoid confusion and not use nautical miles and knots. Lastly, a lot of phrases in the article should be better, such as;
:The cloud mass was first noticed on a satellite picture on June 30, but did not gain a closed circulation until July 1, when it became a tropical depression.
Typically satellite pictures are referred as satellite images. Also, the association of a cloud mass gaining a circulation is a little unusual. A better way to phrase that might be to say after the development of a circulation it became a TD, or something like that.
:Ava moved northwestward at a pace of 15 kt. At one point near peak intensity, it began to make a northward turn, slowing to 3 kt to 5 kt in forward speed and, on July 5, Ava reached its peak intensity of 50 mph.
Is there a way to make that flow better? Perhaps, "Ava tracked to the west-northwestward and steadily intensified. After decelerating and turning to the north, the storm reached a peak intensity of 50 mph" or something like that. 
:An area of squall and shower activity began showing indications of a circulation on July 8.
Too wordy. Try to make it simpler.
:a "pinwheel" of cirrus
:At peak intensity, Heather had the characteristics of a hurricane (namely spiral bands), but the decision was to keep the winds at 65 mph because of cool inflow.
:Two persisted until June 8, when it dissipated.
A lot of phrasing just needs rewriting. Don't try and simplify what the monthly weather review wrote. Put it in your own words. 
Two more things. Be sure to include dates for all important events. I just noticed Claudia missed the date when it formed. Also, use  so the images don't overlap. Hurricanehink (talk) 18:44, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I can easily do conversions on knots to MPH, but I don't know the conversions for nautical miles to miles yet. When I learn that bit, I should be able to fix those metric problems. Jake52 My talk 18:52, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This will help Hurricanehink (talk) 18:56, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Added more info on Heather and Two's regenerations as reported by the JTWC PDF, and on Jennifer's impact as per the NOAA Library document. Jake52 My talk 07:13, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure if you're done of not, but some things still need rewording. For example, never refer depressions as their number (you called TD 2 Two several times; the name is unofficial, and it should be called the depressions). The intro to Ava is way too wordy. In my opinion, it is unnecessary to start every section with "A loosely organized cloud mass was the system that became Claudia". It doesn't sound that good, and could be worded better. The whole article still needs sources. Hurricanehink (talk) 16:09, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Todo
Talk:Boulton and Watt

message: It would be nice if there was more information on the fate of the company. Apparently it could do no wrong towards the end of the 1700s, but the Watt steam engine patent expired in 1800 so I assume the company will have had to diversify. It survived another 95 years so I guess there's an interesting story to tell there, but the article is lacking. RevenDS (talk) 10:01, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Company fate 

message: I have, temporarily, reverted the addition of the company's principal banker as it was in the wrong section and needs better information such as appropriate dates. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 11:53, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, that reads a lot better now. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 12:54, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Charlotte Matthews
Talk:MicroID

message: Shouldn't the article be titled MicroID? This will requires a  move request --Johnjosephbachir
:If you'd like to go ahead with that I approve Fstutzman 17:05, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  It doesn't require a move request, because I think this is an uncontroversial move.  I'll move it ASAP. Mike Tigas 18:49, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name? 

message: Does anybody know how to embed a microID element in a Wiki talk page?  It looks like a <meta/> element, but I don't know how to wikify one of those... Ojcit 00:25, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Add it, prefixed with "microid-", as an HTML class. See the second and third examples on . --82.46.154.93 22:51, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks.  Is Wikipedia going to follow Wikitravel's lead and add it as a user option? Ojcit 05:43, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  wiki MicroID support? 

message: I just read in the microID blog at http://microid.org/blog/?p=16 that one of its authors started this article.  I'm not familiar enough with Wikipedia:No original research to know if there's a real problem.  Wikipedia:Conflict of interest may also apply. Ojcit 00:32, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like it's this guy[], co-founder of ClaimID (and not surprisingly, trivially easy to track down). Does that constitute a conflict of interest? Ojcit 00:46, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is not "original research", this is an adopted identity standard being developed by a consortium of people.  Perhaps it might be helpful to ask questions before you declare this original research and a conflict of interest.   Fstutzman 17:22, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  original research? 

message: I didn't get too deep into the differences between Computer Security and Comptuer Network Security.  Might as well have it both places, as far as I know.  As to whether it's an ID management system, depends on what you mean by ID...some might say you need another system to do the managing.  It's nice to remove a template for every ten or so I add around here. Ojcit 06:22, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  categories 

message: Initially, the purpose of this scheme defied me completely. Why use hashing and what not? Why not just advertise the plain e-mail address as owner of a given page? Maybe in an effort to conceal identify of the owner until the owner wish to make the claim public?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.89.0.118 (talk) 21:27, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The point being? 

message: What sanctions can be placed on someone who trys to claim a page they do not own?  John Zarlino Interent Visionary  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jdzarlino (talk • contribs) 13:29, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  MicroID Purpose
Talk:Cathy Lanier

message: I just removed propaganda "rose from humble beginnings". This is not objective, this is as if someone from the police department wrote it. I think the facts should be formulated first, in a neutral way, without stuff like "unwed mother" - why is it important or relevant that she was married or not at the birth of a child? The article insinuated that she had a hard upbringing, but so did many others without people having had a need to formulate it in quite this way at all. I have a neutral opinion about this person and I want the wikipedia article to be neutral too, not positive or negative. 84.112.136.52 (talk) 09:58, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality of the Article 

message: The speedy delete was inserted onto this page while I was still creating the initial version!  She is to become the first woman police cheif for Washington DC.  I note that her predecessor Charles H. Ramsey has a page.  Where's the consistency? -- 18:54, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed the speedy delete tag as this article does not meet speedy delete status since the article states very clearly why she is notable. If anyone disagrees with her notability feel free to attempt an afd. - Ektar 19:12, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

text: Thanks for leaving a message on my talk page. As I said there, Newpage Patrollers are often very fast and I nominated this article for deletion based on a speed-read. I apologize for that and I think this is a great improvement. Obviously needs a bit of work but fantastic improvement nevertheless. Ekantik 01:18, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Is somebody too quick on the trigger

message: I don't know if this ref warrants inclusion, so I'll mention it here, for others to decide:  Baldacci, David (August 3, 2009) "New Ways to Stop Crime," Parade, pp. 8 & 10.  This is a sensible bio-op on Ms. Lanier written in the weekly newpaper insert in its series "Reinventing America." Kdammers (talk) 06:23, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: additional ref

message: What's her stance on gun control? --41.151.61.54 (talk) 10:21, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gun Control
Talk:Wobble base pair

message: I suggest this article to be renamed Wobble HYPOTHESIS
Why the wobble hypothesis?  I think the existence of these base pairs is pretty well established.
Also - the Wobble base pairs are not the primary means that nature uses 20 amino acids with 64 codons - most of this is just redundancy of codons (several codons that code for the same amino acid).  The different codons can lead to different RNA folding, and also different folding of the nascent protein (because of differences during the translation process.)
142.157.72.172 18:31, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The first references cited gives, for example, bovines as having 4112 tRNAs -- provided, vertebrates compose a tiny fraction of species, but to say that most species possess less than 45 species of tRNA while most vertebrates apparently have in the thousands...doesn't that sort of question whether or not the wobble effect takes place outside of microbiota?  Or does it occurring there necessitate it occurring everywhere? DRosenbach (Talk | Contribs) 13:25, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: In the cited example the 4112 means that cows have 4112 'genes' for tRNA, not 4112 types of tRNA. There is considerable redundancy with many genes coding for each type of tRNA. Presumably there is evolutionary advantage in this - it means that a mutation in one of the genes that encodes tRNA will not be fatal. The cow exhibits both canonical and wobble pairing. For example Ala is enoded by GCU, GCC, GCA, GCG an the cow has genes for the four species of tRNA required by canonical pairing: AGCtRNAAla (29 genes), CGCtRNAAla (17 genes), GGCtRNAAla (2 genes), TGCtRNAAla (34 genes).  However Asn ie encoded by AAU and AAC whereas the cow has only genes for GTTtRNAAsn - which means G-U and G-C wobble base pairing must be occurring in the encoding of Asn. Martin.Budden (talk) 20:22, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  tRNA numbers 

message: The "wobble base" queuosine is not mentioned in this article, but should be included.  I don't know if there are any others besides hypoxanthine and queuosine; can someone else chime in? MM (talk) 22:19, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  other wobble bases 

message: Does wobble base pairing hypothesis follows watson and cricks rule? 118.103.136.49 (talk) 06:25, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wooble base
Talk:Hits Radio Cornwall

message: Anyone got an image of the parrot logo?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C5:5218:F001:A540:27FC:BCAE:F432 (talk) 15:29, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  images 

message: The style of writing in this article requires review.
It comes across as too 'chatty', and flimsy on fact.
More references are required.
Tinminer 09:57, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  tone & style of this article 
Talk:Toby Gard

message: I removed the link to Mobygames as it provided no additional information that wasn't already better represented on IMDB.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.194.21.34 (talk) 18:26, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed Link 
Talk:Hierarchical structure of Feudal Japan

message: This article reads like a middle-schooler's paper. Is there a template to indicate that fact? 82.61.181.10 (talk) 15:00, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: This article needs some major revision to make it both up to standards and historically accurate. Once it is corrected it will be very similar to the article Four divisions of society. I think they should be merged together. I will go ahead and do this, but if there are any objections or other thoughts I would like to hear them first. Orange43 (talk) 00:28, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: For what it's worth, I think it's a great idea.  I like the Four Divisions article, I really think someone did a nice job in organizing the four classes, as well as providing background information.  So, my for my part, I say we merge this into that article.  --Ph0kin (talk) 22:42, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: After making this suggestion I ended up creating and writing a new article, Edo society, to cover more than just the theoretical divisions of society. Most of the information in this (Feudal Japan hierarchy) article is actually more relevant to the Edo period, which could be either be considered late feudal or early early modern and therefore the article may be misnamed. The Four divisions of society article is essentially a third article with much the same information as well. Personally, I think the Four divisions article should be either expanded as being specific to the theoretical model, if the amount of information warrants it, or eliminated and this article should be rewritten to cover society during the distinctly different high medieval period. I would also then support renaming this article to Feudal Japan Society, or something similar, to show it's broader scope. I'd like a second opinion, however, to make sure I'm not too biased because I wrote one of the articles. Orange43 (talk) 17:11, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Your Edo society article is far superior to this.  This has virtually no redeeming value, so unless there are objections, I'll just redirect this one there outright. Jpatokal (talk) 15:29, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Moosilauke Ravine Lodge

message: Jack Noon wasn't really responsible for saving the Lodge.  That credit should go to Al Merrill, the Ski Coach and later director of Outdoor Programs.  He got the money and attention to keep the place upright, hired Jack as the lodge manager, and kept the Freshman Trips program going at MRL.  Jack was the public face at the Lodge, but Al was the driving force.
I'll update the page at a later date, unless the person who created the page wants to take a shot at it.
------------------------
I updated the page with info about Al Merrill, corrected the spelling of McKenney and added a few odds and ends.
------------------------
Thanks for the corrections. I created the page, but took most of the info from the DOC webpage, so I knew it was incomplete. Feel free to toss anything else you can think of on there.
DuncmanG 22:44, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm hoping to upload a couple more for a gallery. Once I get my hands on a copy of 'Reaching That Peak' (the DOC history) I'm looking to flesh out this page a bit. 
Havenoterty (talk) 13:27, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added a picture
Talk:Pebble Beach Concours d'Elegance

message: Worth mentioning J. B. Nethercutt is only six-time winner? Shouldn't a list of winners be included?  Trekphiler 19:02, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

message: I am thinking about writing an article called the "List of Pebble Beach Concours d'Elegance Best of Show winners".  This would be a stand-alone list of the vehicles (with links to WP articles where possible) that won Best of Show.  I could not find this information on the Concours web site but I have this year's program with the list, so it's not OR.  Before I go through the trouble of putting together this list, I wanted to make sure it was notable enough to stay on Wikipedia.  Thoughts from anyone?  Thanks, 72Dino (talk) 03:43, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of Best of Show winners
Talk:Poo-Chi

message: Wikified as part of the Wikification wikiproject! JubalHarshaw 19:11, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: did the author forget that the poochie came with a bone that it responded to? its even in the picture .  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jcdlvsrbld (talk • contribs) 21:40, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bone..... 

message: Does Heart Energy Poochi count as a Poo-chi spin off? It shares the same company and name.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pix12 (talk • contribs) 00:10, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heart Energy Poochi (Wappy Dog)?
Talk:Personal pension scheme

message: I would suggest that Self Invested Personal Pensions (SIPPs) probably should be added to the Personal Pensions page, as the former are one of two sub-types of the latter (the other sub type being Insured Personal Pensions).
Incidentally, Stakeholder Pensions are a sub-type of Insured Personal Pensions, so should probably also be added.
T Durham
(Pensions Specialist IFA)
Trevordurham 13:45, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I disagree.  Given the increasing popularity of SIPPs and the significant distinctions I think there is more than sufficient information for 2 articles.  Stakeholders and PPs could be merged though. simonthebold 16:32, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  SIPPs and Personal pensions 

message: I've never heard of this term before and I've used personal, stakeholder and SIPPs over the years. Is it an official term (link please) ? What is insured ? Thanks -- John (Daytona2 ·  Talk ·  Contribs) 17:51, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Insured Personal Pensions

message: References to previous legislation (eg <6/4/6) need to be removed/updated. -- John (Daytona2 ·  Talk ·  Contribs) 17:51, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Out of date info.
Talk:DISTAR

message: Is this page even notable? There are very few links to this page, and it's not much beyond a definition. – Chris53516 (Talk) 19:15, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay... seems like there's someone out there adding links. Are there any sources for conveying the idea that this is notable? — Chris53516 (Talk) 03:28, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

text: It could be included as a subsection of the general article on direct instruction, but that seems to have become something of a political football. Rorybowman 18:55, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability