lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Unboxing

message: The article says "Yahoo Tech, places the first Unboxing video to be for the Nokia E61 cellphone in 2006," and feels 2006 is when people started searching for "unboxing" in larger numbers. However, here's an example of a person doing a hardware product unboxing way back in 1982 — unpacking and showing off a Commodore 64 computer in exactly the same way one would do an unboxing today: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NfTbgmJf_-E — is it worth noting this and/or trying to ascertain the real first/oldest unboxing video, even if the more widespread term "unboxing" didn't become commonplace until later? — Mecandes (talk) 17:42, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: First / Oldest

message: The term "unboxing" has an entirely different common usage in gadget/computer hardware blogs and publications, and IMHO rather than a redirect to object type, this page should be a disambiguation page with a link to unboxing (hardware). Raines 03:52, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:She dwelt among the untrodden ways

message: Since this poem is in the public domain, and only 3 stanzas of four lines, can we go ahead and just include it in the article? --JayHenry 04:13, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for a framework for expansion. A trip to the library is called for. Ceoil 21:06, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
File talk:SSBB Cover.jpg

message: How can we be sure this is the official cover? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.231.78.107 (talk • contribs) 
:Nintendo's official press site has this boxart, as well as the February 10, 2008 release date, listed.  More information can be found in the Brawl article's talk page. Arrowned 04:23, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question 

message: The page was nominated for speedy deletion mainly due to an absence of image, of which I have no idea how it happened.  At any rate, I'm currently trying to furiously reupload the image to fix the problem before a deletion happens, so please hold on before deleting this. Arrowned (talk) 00:28, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The image has been successfully reuploaded.  As the creator of the page, I can't remove the deletion tag myself, but there should be no problems now. Arrowned (talk) 00:30, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speedy Deletion
Talk:Polly Platt

message: For future reference:
The person who is the subject of this article is not the same Polly Platt who died in 2008. The Polly Platt who died in 2008 was a journalist born in 1927. See, e.g., . Famspear (talk) 17:19, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Two different people named Polly Platt
Talk:Judge Bao fiction

message: Removing prod because the book is a significant work in Chinese literature with non-trivial academic interest.
This is a case where the WP:BK guideline advises common sense. A worldcat search shows 12 editions in Chinese since the 1970s.
*
*
*
• Gene93k 04:28, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Something of this research needs to be added carefully to the article itself. Its not enough to "know" it is notable it must be demonstrated with sourcing. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 10:15, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  De-[[WP:PROD|prodding]] as notable
Talk:Führer Headquarters

message: This article has newly been created. Please bear with me; I will be adding more to it in the coming days. I've got a bunch of more HQ:s to add to this article. Regards, --Dna-Dennis 04:32, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No more HQ:s to add as far as I know. --Dna-Dennis 15:57, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Creation

message: More info here in the German Wikipedia:
Führerhauptquartier (German).
and in the Polish Wikipedia here:
Führerhauptquartier (Polish).
Führersonderzug (Polish).
It would be nice if these got assessed and translated...
--Dna-Dennis 16:15, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: German & Polish Info

message: In the bibliography, the link for Richard Raiber doesn't work.
71.230.201.203 (talk) 02:45, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Broken Link

message: i want to 2600:387:B:9A2:0:0:0:37 (talk) 18:09, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  i want to know who hitler is?
Talk:Photomapping

message: Talk:Aerial_photography#Merger_with_Orthophotomap Da5nsy (talk) 00:03, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger discussion that effects this page 
Talk:Puerto Rico Highway 22

message: Could we get the opinion of other editors regarding the need to include "United States" after "Puerto Rico" in the introduction of this article.
A concern is that its inclusion makes the introductory statement weaker as it appears to detract from the subject of the article, namely highway PR-22.  
(If I had no knowledge about some road and was searching the Wikipedia for information about it, I'd just like to read "PR-22 is a toll road in the north coast of Puerto Rico," period.)
In addition to appear distracting, the inclusion of "United States" may also appear to be making a political statement, namely that Puerto Rico is part of the United States (something that would belong in another article).
In any event, the preference would be to leave out "United States" since if the reader wanted to know more about Puerto Rico there is already a link via the "[ [ Puerto Rico ] ]"  format.
Hopefully the original contributing editor and/or other editors can share their view on the matter and come to some agreement that will make the article palatable to most.
CallmeDrNo (talk) 01:13, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need to specify "United States"? 

message: Exit 57, Salida 57 says "Florida Farmacéuticas" and the article has a wikilink to "Florida", which is a city in Puerto Rico but also has a link to "Farmacéuticas". The link to "Farmacéuticas" will be red forever because there is no such city.  You can also see the image of the exit which is on the article.... It's not the only instance where this occurs. Is there a way to fix this? --The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 12:06, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Red link to something that'll never be an article
Talk:Asam pedas

message: The spelling can be Assam fish.
This is a typical dish that can be found in Malaysia and Singapore, however it is a distinctively Malay dish. If any help is needed on the article, kindly drop me a message.-Gammadion 04:50, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: More Work on Article

message: Actually Asam Pedas is not only Malaysian fish stew, it was the method of cooking seafoods and fishes that employed tamarind and chilli; not necesarily fish, cuttlefish also can be made Asam Pedas. Asam Pedas is native to Minangkabau cuisine and Malay cuisine and popular in Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore (I don't know about Brunei).(Gunkarta (talk) 15:11, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Asam Pedas in Region (Southeast Asia) 
Talk:Feed the Children

message: the article @  from the reference section says 
"Feed the Children (FC), an AIP F-rated charity that spends only 18% of its cash budget on program services and spends 60% on direct mail and television and radio ads, has been enormously successful obtaining gifts in kind. In fiscal 2004 FC received $865 million in donated goods, a 79% increase from fiscal 2003. 64% of its in kind donations came from three corporations, according to FC’s fiscal 2004 audit."
This means that for the total. Cash is different than total contributions. This means that more than 18% of their total contributions are spent on program services. That is why the numbers from charitywatch.org and charitynavigator.org differ wildly.
I will put the reference after the information if that will help you understand.198.208.159.18 04:54, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment A

message: AIP's website lists serious problems at Feed The Children. Since many of these are also documented by news organizations and in lawsuits, they should be included in the article where relevant. Tragic romance (talk) 15:11, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Serious problems

message: This should be at Feed the Children, but someone incorrectly moved it here. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:52, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, it may be more correctly at Feed The Children, if that's how the organization styles itself. The issue has been escalated to Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (capitalization) at this time. —C.Fred (talk) 20:25, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect capitalization
Talk:We the People (Indian TV series)

message: This article has obviously been created by someone assuming that the show echoes the voice of India which it certainly does not do. It makes no sense for this article to exist in the first place. dirty but clean 04:57, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Worth deleting
Talk:The Wild Brunch

message: I can see that people have been adding music to the episode pages - please do not do this! See here: Wikipedia:Television episodes#Things to avoid.  An article about television episodes is only supposed to contain:
* A brief summary of the episode's plot (see below)
* How the episode was received by critics
* Information on production and broadcasting of the episode
* Real-world factors that have influenced the work or fictional element.
This info is also from the WP:EPISODE page. Thank you — *Hippi ippi 05:00, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Music
Talk:Measure of the National Assembly for Wales

message: Due to the 2011 referendum, this article should largely be in the 'past tense', as these are the old legislative powers of the Welsh Assembly. 82.11.223.222 (talk) 19:47, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: As I understand it, no new laws will be effected until the new Assembly Members have been elected in May. Daicaregos (talk) 21:34, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Past tense 
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Belldandy

message: Um, what block history? I only counted one block for that Cat-chi person, and that was for 15 minutes... a joke maybe? tsk tsk tsk.  —  Rickyrab | Talk 05:02, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: He had a previous account, which contained a few blocks. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 06:25, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There was another before that, with some more. —Cryptic 20:46, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Poison Ivy (Gossip Girl)

message: I can see that people have been adding music to the episode pages - please do not do this! See here: Wikipedia:Television episodes#Things to avoid.  An article about television episodes is only supposed to contain:
* A brief summary of the episode's plot (see below)
* How the episode was received by critics
* Information on production and broadcasting of the episode
* Real-world factors that have influenced the work or fictional element.
This info is also from the WP:EPISODE page. Thank you — *Hippi ippi 05:09, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Music 

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://www.buddytv.com/articles/gossip-girl/gossip-girl-episode-13-poison-11906.aspx. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  MER-C 09:22, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Bad News Blair

message: I can see that people have been adding music to the episode pages - please do not do this! See here: Wikipedia:Television episodes#Things to avoid.  An article about television episodes is only supposed to contain:
* A brief summary of the episode's plot (see below)
* How the episode was received by critics
* Information on production and broadcasting of the episode
* Real-world factors that have influenced the work or fictional element.
This info is also from the WP:EPISODE page. Thank you — *Hippi ippi 05:10, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Music 

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://www.buddytv.com/articles/gossip-girl/gossip-girl-episode-14-bad-new-12287.aspx. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  MER-C 09:36, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Solvolysis

message: Need solvolysis always be an SN1? Why can't it be an SN2? This is a terribly brief article, and the context seems to be missing. I've pointed ammonolysis and alcoholysis here. --Rifleman 82 05:31, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *After further investigation, Sykes's A Guidebook to Mechanism in Organic Chemistry, 6th Edition, states that the transesterification mechanism is BAC2 (Based-catalyzed, acyl-oxygen cleavage, bimolecular). Source page #239.--E8 (talk) 14:33, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Not necessarily, as transesterification can also be catalyzed by an acid. But it is usually neither SN1 nor SN2 because the reaction involves addition to the carbonyl. --Itub (talk) 15:15, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: *Yes, I should've mentioned that. This discussion has taken place over a number of different pages for the last year. Do have access to kinetics data that would indicate what type of pathway acid-catalyzed transesterification follows?--E8 (talk) 15:43, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: SN1?
Talk:York Memorial Collegiate Institute

message: This page is ridiculous. Bring it up to standards.
Rykoshet 05:47, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Leos (mythology)

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot 05:48, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-10-12 Automated pywikipediabot message 

message: None of the articles referenced on the page "Leo," to which this redirects, are relevant to a search for the Greek hero "Leos."  One of the ten tribes of Athens, the "Leontides," were named for Leos.  But if anyone searches for Leos, they are redirected to an entirely irrelevant list. zadignose (talk) 08:51, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Not anymore :). 11:08, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why redirect?  There is no entry for "Leos" on the "Leo" page. 
Talk:Daiki Kameda

message: Edited the part where it read "He lost by Daisuke Naito in October 11th, 2007 and committed seppuku only to die.", since it obviously was untrue.
--White Requiem 05:51, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ned's Mordern Life

message: This article appears to be talking about Ned's Declassified School Survival Guide --rpyle731talk 06:32, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplicate article 

message: it's just another page for Ned's Declassified School Survival guide so why is it here?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.9.145.225 (talk) 04:02, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Can someone get rid of this article?
Talk:Kirk in the Hills

message: The last edit adds Harry Liva to the list of sculptors, an edit done by Liva's great-great nephew.  If that person sees this comment, please drop me a new message or an email -- eager to know more about Harry's career and life!  This is one of a small handful of references we have for him.  Thanks much --Lockley 06:40, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclusion of stone carver Harry Liva
Talk:Hindavi

message: Hindawi is an historic language from India, and is in partial use today. Please help develop this article, and do not speedy it based on flimsy grounds. I would request you to format it further if are interested and knowledgable, especially about the available literature in Hindawi.
Hi pedler 06:44, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

message: It is not a good idea to merge Hindawi and Hindoostanee / Hindustani. Hindoostanee was a word coined by the British during their occupation and refers to class of languages of which Hindawi is a member. Hindoostanee could as well be used for Khari Boli, Braj Bhasha, Awadhi to name a few. Hi pedler (talk) 04:45, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Hindavi was a "member"? Can you tell me the difference between Khariboli and Hindavi? Also please link me something on which you base your belief that Hindustani also meant Braj bhasha and Awadhi. Maquahuitltalk! 13:51, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hindoostanee 

message: Hindawi is pronounced as [hin as in 'hint']+[da as in the first sound in 'then']+[wi as wee]. It is not [vi as in victory]. Hi pedler (talk) 04:45, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hindawi and not Hindavi 

message: Over two years, the only objection to merging was that the author of this article does not like the name "Hindustani". However, regardless of which name is preferable, the articles cover the same topic, and therefore per WP:content forking needed to be merged, and that has now been done. An argument at returning the merged article to "Hindavi" can be made on the talk page. However, per WP:common name, I rather doubt that it will generate much support. — kwami (talk) 08:36, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  merged
Talk:Cydia (moth)

message: Some more information on which species are used for biological control. --Viren 06:55, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Office of the Prime Minister (Canada)

message: Aside from the question of whether or not the so-called 'Wright-Duffy Affair' meets WP:NOTE (it doesn't have an article on Wikipedia), the material inserted in this article about it seems misplaced. The name of the affair indicates it is between two individuals--former Chief of Staff Nigel Wright and Senator Mike Duffy. These two persons are not together the Office of the Prime Minister, nor is either apart, and no indication is given in the article as to how the entire Office of the Prime Minister is related to the affair. Hence, it appears to be a partisan attempt to make negative insinuations against the Prime Minister and/or the Conservative Party, which is contrary to WP:NPOV. --Ħ MIESIANIACAL 21:37, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Wright-Duffy Affair'
Talk:Keep On Truckin' (comics)

message: Yes, but what does it mean??
Also, where is the urban landscape in the picture? I see only a horison.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.83.251.4 (talk) 00:08, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Urban landscape is in the other panels of the comic. InnocuousPseudonym (talk) 07:54, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

text: If it is not copyrighted, why dont you post pics?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.55.45.168 (talk) 08:21, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Initial comment 

message: http://pbfcomics.com/189/
It seems relevant to me, since a) Nicholas Gurewitch (and his Perry Bible Fellowship comic) is fairly well known (and critically acclaimed), and b) it's a very obvious riff on Crumb's comic, not an obscure reference one can chose no to see.
Should I add a line about it?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Minvogt (talk • contribs) 13:16, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Do we have any information about when that was produced? —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 16:52, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  How about adding the Perry Bible Fellowship parody? 

message: I have deleted the following passage (and moved it here, obviously):
: The Internal Revenue Service pursued Crumb for thousands of dollars of taxes owed, as if he had been collecting royalties all along. 
The source does not back up the claim that the IRS bill was for royalties that Crumb had not actually received due to copyright violations. Gwideman (talk) 01:53, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed: Claim that IRS billed Crumb for taxes on Keep on Truckin's absent revenue. 
Talk:V-J Day in Times Square/Archive 1

message: The material in this article as it stands now (3 August 07) is a barely retouched version of what was written within the article on Alfred Eisenstaedt. Contrary to what a quick glance at the article's edit history might suggest, it's not by me (and it strikes me as mediocre). -- Hoary 15:18, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: From [[Alfred Eisenstaedt]]

message: Portions of this article are taken word for word from an article by the AP. 
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070803/ap_on_re_us/kissing_sailor_1;_ylt=AtZvuKNpyW0vDj.Ywu_On9dsaMYA ... added at 16:32, 4 August 2007 by 24.4.209.123
:Yes, but how exactly do you cite them in the article? I'd say citing sources in Wikipedia is the second hardest thing to do, after uploading and choosing the correct copyright for pictures. I've been editing Wikipedia since 2005, and citing references still gives me trouble, even when looking at the article on how to do it. We'll probably have to wait for a very experienced Wikipedian before it can be done. Kevin 19:51, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's pretty easy, Kevin, at least in principle. You find a reliable source. You read and digest what it says. You summarize as much as possible of what it says in your own words. (If the exact wording is particularly significant, you put that part in quotation marks, and you make no change whatever to what's within those quotation marks other than as clearly explained in any style guide: "Chicago", "MLA", etc., or indeed the Wikipedia's own "MoS".) You then use a footnote to identify the source. If you notice plagiarism by somebody else, or are told of it, you remove it, immediately. You can think later about how best to edit the article. -- Hoary 01:18, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

text: Thank you for pointing out the plagiarism. I have hurriedly removed everything that I noticed was plagiarized. If I have missed anything (if there's any more here that's plagiarized), please remove that too. -- Hoary 01:18, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copy of an AP article?
Talk:Mad Dog Morgan

message: The article claims a poor box office performance, but additionally "sold well around the world". I'd say it bombed at the box office, as did most of these Ozzy cowboy movies from the 70s. The incidental music, if present, was either a German oompa band, or Gregorian chants. Filmed with a Panaflex camera, and audio recorded via Kmart cassette recorder.
The movie is a travesty of historical accuracy. Morgan (real name John Fuller) had an English father and Welsh mother. He was raised by a Welshman. The Irish accent was unlikely. He used the alias to garner sympathy and support from Irish country folk. A very underhanded trick from a very underhanded criminal.220.244.89.252 (talk) 02:06, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stuff 