lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:International Culinary Center

message: I removed the 2 paragraphs about the recent lawsuit from the Lead and moved them, after editing, to another seemingly more appropriate section of the article. The reason for the edits was that, aside from it being unduly in the Lead, it read like an "attack piece" on the school. I found quite a few articles that mentioned the suit, so its worthy of inclusion, but not in the Lead. --Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... (Talk) 18:22, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lawsuit 

message: We are requesting removal of the subsection 'Italy Campus' under the main section dedicated to and named 'Campuses' on this page, as the International Culinary Center (ICC) does not have a campus in Italy. The International Culinary Center offers an Italian culinary program in partnership with Alma, a leading culinary school in Colorno, Italy (near Parma). Alma and ICC are independent schools.
Please also remove the reference to 'campus' in the 'Curriculum' main section, in the paragraph where the Italian program is described so it just reads "at Alma".
Please reference http://www.internationalculinarycenter.com/ and http://www.internationalculinarycenter.com/new-york-campus/italian-culinary-experience/ as sources. 
Thank you.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thursday918 (talk • contribs) 17:19, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Regards,  spintendo  20:51, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request 

message: Additional changes were made to the article:
# The curriculum section and campus addresses were omitted, per WP:NOTDIRECTORY.
# Minor edits regarding the use of WP:PEACOCK terms were made.
# An unreferenced quote was removed.
# An unreferenced award mention was removed.
# The lists of alumni, David Chang, Bobby Flay, Dan Barber, Wylie Dufresne and Christina Tosi were omitted. These should be placed in the article using the style indicated under WP:ALUMNI.
:Regards,  spintendo  20:51, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Reply 17-JUL-2018
Talk:New England Culinary Institute

message: This section is quite biased; I don't know enough about the school to provide an accurate version, but this text should be changed. -Nick Klose (T/C) 21:57, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Violation of [[WP:NPOV]] in "Small classes" section 
Talk:Only One (Yellowcard song)

message: There was a music video made for this single. Can anyone write something about it here, and what the video talked about? Arbiteroftruth (talk) 19:34, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Music Video
Talk:Kemps Creek, New South Wales

message: Since 'World's Largest Chicken' redirects to this article, it would be good if the article included at least a sentence about said chicken.  If there is a chicken. Andrewbogott (talk) 19:17, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirected from World's Largest Chicken 
Talk:Müller Milk & Ingredients

message: Fair use rationale for Wiseman logo added by scancoaches 14:34, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo 
Talk:Danthonia

message: This info isnt true  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.237.33.124 (talk) 00:11, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If you really think that something isn't true, it would be more useful to correct it, or at least specify what isn't true. —Snigbrook 00:15, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  This info isnt true 

message: I just ran across this article, and wondered about the species list. It differs considerably from the list of accepted names at ThePlantList.org (only has 12 in common), and doesn't seem to match the two references either. Does anyone know the source of this list? Should it be revisited? --Araucana (talk) 16:23, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, the original species list (dating to July 2007) was lagging behind the original references, which have since been revised. I have now updated it.--Melburnian (talk) 22:21, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Nicely done-- and quickly too! Parry's oatgrass is one of my favorites. (We should do a page for it, eh?) Best regards! --Araucana (talk) 16:27, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Species list
Talk:Holsworthy, New South Wales

message: The file for Holsworthy in the infobox is a tree currently growing on Holsworthy High School.  Is this a true representative of Holsworthy?  If it is, what is the tree (species)? 71.234.215.133 (talk) 23:42, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The tree is a Jacaranda. It's the only photo of Hosworthy that I have. If you have a photo that is a better representation of the suburb then please upload it. J Bar (talk) 01:17, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The tree is...?
Talk:Wattle Grove, New South Wales

message: Ideally suited to being a section in the Wattle Grove page. Gusfriend (talk) 09:16, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. I don't think it's noteworthy enough to warrant being its' own article. Xs zhang6 (talk) 01:22, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

text: I agree as well, it is a very short page as well, I think it should be merged into the wattle grove article Tacomelon (talk) 05:59, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

text: Also agreed. I'll do it now since consent is unanimous —Remember, I'murmate — I'ma editor2022 (🗣️💬 |📖📚) 14:46, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Wattle Grove Lake]] into [[Wattle Grove]]
Talk:Rowe Street, Sydney

message: Note: There is a proposal at WT:AURD#Move_articles_to_bracket_disambiguation to rename this article (and others) to conform to the WP:AURDNAME guideline – specifically, using brackets instead of a comma for disambiguation. - Evad37 [talk] 09:04, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation style
Talk:Yamato (fictional spacecraft)

message: I'm kind of bothered that the 2nd AFD closed as "no concensus" when there was actual consensus to keep by the end of the discussion. The only "delete" votes were from editors who just pointed to policies or guidelines and never bothered to come back. But, whatever... what's done is done.--Nohansen (talk) 03:37, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment on 2nd AFD nomination 

message: * No sources, just one embedded link that leads to an empty page (and the URL suggests it would be a primary source); the AfD keep !votes mention a source, but it hasn't found its way into the article after 4 years. And it's almost all in-universe. --Stfg (talk) 10:56, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: GOCEreviewed
Talk:Invicta Ground

message: I've got afew extra bits of information that I found when researching Arsenal. In 1890 the pitch was 130 yards long x 90 yards wide (that was a lot of pitch!), there were 1500 seats in the east stand, the main entrance was in Plumstead High Street and there was space for a total of 3000 spectators on the south & west terraces. Ground rent for the first season was £50. This information came from the Kentish Mercury.--Goonerak (talk) 18:46, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Llandilo, New South Wales

message: This needs expansion. I don't know whether it's Llandeilo (which was spelt without the E years ago) or whether it's the small Pembrokeshire settlement of LLandilo. 16:43, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point. I've just stumbled upon this now and immediately asked myself the same question. Llandeilo (llan + (Saint) Teilo) is the correct spelling for both places with the form 'Llandilo' reflecting pronunciation in the local dialect for SW Wales. There are also several other small places called Llandeilo, each distinguished by an epithet e.g. Llandeilo Ferwallt, which complicates matters. As I'm tempted to write an article on this Llandilo (NSW) over on Welsh Wikipedia it would be helpful to know which Welsh Llandeilo was the original. I haven't a clue about that at the moment; could somebody here enlighten us? Is there anybody from the Llandilo, NSW area who has contributed here and might have access to information? (The Pembs Llandeilo/Llandilo is a rural parish, by the way). Enaidmawr (talk) 23:54, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, I was wondering about the Pembs one: I chose "settlement" precisely because I couldn't find enough information on it to be sure what it actually was! (I seem not to have signed my earlier comment properly. Bad show, me.) Loganberry (Talk) 00:44, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: As the other examples of Llandeilo/Llandilo are all parishes and/or communities or very small villages I'd put my money on the obvious candidate, Llandeilo, but we can'r really say that without a reference. Must be available somewhere... Glad to see I'm not the only one who likes searching for 'missing links'! If I find something I'll get back on this but it's already rather late in the morning so I'll leave it for now. Enaidmawr (talk) 01:13, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Named after a Welsh town? 
Talk:Kassam Stadium

message: I edited the "Contruction" section, removing red links to Keith Cox, OxVox and Birse Construction. This is because Wikipedia recommends that red links should not be created for topics that will never have articles, and I don't think the aforementioned topics are notable enough to ever warrant articles.
I also pointed the red link "Company Voluntary Arrangement" to "Administration (insolvency)" because, currently, there is no article for CVA, and I felt it might be helpful for readers to be directed to an article on insolvency to understand what a CVA relates to. The Baroness of Morden (talk) 12:56, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "Construction" tidy-up

message: I forgot to say that the reason I cleaned up the red links was because it looked clutterd on the page. I also forogt to mention that I left those for Manor Hospital, Robin Herd and Firoka Group because I thought they are notable enough for somebody to want to create articles for them. The Baroness of Morden (talk) 18:40, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Red links 

message: I changed a few minor things within the article. These included a couple of awkward sentences, missing words (such as "in front of 7842", where I added "a crowd of"), and references to "the Us", which I changed to "Oxford United". Also, there was an instance of two links appearing next to each other, looking like one link. It was a link to the Oxford Mail and a link to "newspaper", and I removed the latter because it is unnecessary.
The "Usage" section looks overlinked, but does anybody have any opinion on this? I am going to remove the link to OUFC as, though it is the first link to the article in that section, it appears not so far up in the article (and it is only a short article).
I'm now going to remove the cleanup tag because I think it has been done (with the exception of possible overlinking), and I am going to put a citations tag (as I added a couple of fact tags. The Baroness of Morden (talk) 14:52, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup of whole article 
Talk:Elections in Cambodia

message: The very first paragraph of the article (which describes what an election is and what this article does), is, in my judgement, unnecessary. I have taken teh liberty of deleting it. --Thehistorian10 (talk) 18:06, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  First paragraph 
Talk:Xing Kong

message: In Thailand, it is possible to watch Xing Kong by satellite TV.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.27.45.136 (talk) 15:55, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Xing Kong is also available in Thailand. 
Talk:Stray Little Devil

message: I see that this page is made to spoil as much of the manga as possible... (lucky for me, that I had already read all four released volumes, before reading it)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.225.30.106 (talk) 22:17, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not really spoilers. This is an entry that supplies information about the series. Anyone coming in to read the entry should be aware that they are likely to read information about the series, which includes "spoilers". Tokyogirl79 (talk) 04:14, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled comments
Talk:Athletic Ground (Scarborough)

message: I propose moving this article to Athletic Ground (Scarborough), which currently redirects here. Normal practice is to use traditional names, where one exists, rather than sponsored ones, e.g. Pride Park Stadium or Almondvale Stadium. The ground was known as the Athletic Ground for the majority of its existence. I think that what has happened here is that the McCain name was a particularly early example of a sponsored ground name, in the UK a least; and in an earlier Wikipedia age, the article was created under the then-current name, when consensus on these cases probably hadn't developed. Jellyman (talk) 17:07, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Given the lack of response, I am going to submit a formal move request on this basis. Jellyman (talk) 21:33, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed move 
Talk:Xanterra Travel Collection

message: I believe Xanterra are descended from the Fred Harvey operation. Amfac.com redirects to the Xanterra website. knoodelhed 05:42, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corporate past
Talk:Ethie Castle

message: http://news.bbc.co.uk/local/taysideandcentralscotland/hi/people_and_places/newsid_9106000/9106322.stm haunted  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.208.26.179 (talk) 00:25, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Meadow Lane

message: Current stadium capacity of 20,438 is taken from http://www.nottscountyfc.premiumtv.co.uk/page/MeadowLane/0,,10426,00.html
Official web site of Nott's County  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.113.48.9 (talk) 14:28, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stadium Capacity

message: Added a picture into the infobox on the main article page, anyone feel free to change it if it does not clearly show the ground in it's full light. Jazza5 17:26, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox Picture
Talk:Millmoor

message: The pitch dimensions on the infobox suggest it was 110m x 72m, whilst the Belle Vue page states "The ground was renowned for having one of the top five biggest pitches in the UK, at 110 yards long, and 72 yards wide." To my knowledge, Millmoor was a small and narrow pitch, so one of the grounds' dimensions is probably wrong. Richard n 13:04, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Both seem to be wrong. Rotherham's website places the pitch at 115 x 70 yards - presumably whoever wrote the infobox text got mixed up with the units. But the unsourced claim in the Belle Vue article should be removed, since 110 x 72 is no larger than many current grounds (e.g. Galpharm Stadium, Reebok Stadium and even the ancient Underhill Stadium). Alzarian16 (talk) 15:49, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pitch Dimensions 
Talk:IBM System Management Facilities

message: The version of this page - when I first saw it - confused SMF and RMF. Hence the mistaken comment about CMF being an alternative to SMF. Am going to attempt to fix this up. Martin Packer 13:45, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

message: I'm going to add info about log stream recording and associated dump utilities.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zetacloud (talk • contribs) 10:08, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  log stream recording news
Talk:Moss Rose

message: I would like to add that the stadium is now known as the Leasing.com Stadium as part of the new Macclesfield FC Phoenix club. I work there, so there is a conflict of interest. Can anybody else change please. Here’s the source. https://www.macclesfieldfc.com/leasing-dot-com-official-stadium-sponsor NemoEvs1981 (talk) 18:42, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  New sponsorship and Macclesfield FC
Talk:Meadow Park (Borehamwood)

message: Meadow Park in Borehamwood, Hertfordshire is a Public Park. A portion of the land is leased to a football club.
If you want to make reference to where the club has their stadium, you need to add reference it to Meadow Park.
Attached is a copy of the freehold that shows that the property belongs to Hertsmere Council and NOT a football club.
Please revert changes accordingly back to the correct page
Angry birdies (talk) 08:15, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: No, the park isn't notable, whilst the football stadium is. Even if the park was notable, the article should be about both the park and the football stadium in the park. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:44, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect use of Meadow Park Borehamwood
Talk:Marston's Stadium

message: Whether it's an unlogged user having a laugh or an editor not logged in, I expect the former. The Stadium is not sited in Barwell. Barwell Parish only extends to the end of the Common Road. The Perimeter Road, the roundabout on the Perimeter Road and indeed the ground are sited within Hinckley. DJhinckley 15:18, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Site of Stadium
Talk:Marrickville South, New South Wales

message: I'm fairly sure there is no such suburb as 'Marrickville South' which would explain the lack of detail in the article. Sydney suburbs are very clearly deliniated in all street directories and I remember a competition a few years back where the only Sydney suburbs starting with 'South' were South Coogee and South Wento. I'll double check and if there's nothing on geographical names board or Sydway then it should be redirected back to 'Marrickville.'.  Mdw0 (talk) 07:03, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tempe, New South Wales

message: Hi - just hoping to clear up something.
Tempe was the name A. B. Spark gave to his farm - the house came later. If you see a notice he placed in The Sydney Monitor in 1828 (top right of page):
https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/page/4244631
"Mr. Spark's Farm, at Tempe, Cook's River"
And again in The Sydney Gazette two years later (fifth column):
https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/2196011
"At Tempe, the seat of A. B. SPARK, Esq. on the banks of Cook's River"
You should see that both these references predate Tempe House. 1.43.41.96 (talk) 04:58, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tempe is named after Spark's farm
Talk:List of University of Sydney people

message: The following entries might be notable but there are no references to verify this. If you can find a reference then re-add them Aloneinthewild (talk) 20:20, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed entries 
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Assam/List of spellings of place and area names

message: Please refer to the following discussions as well before contributing to this debate:
*Talk:Guwahati#Spellings/naming conventions of streets and areas
*Wikipedia:WikiProject Assam/Naming convention
*Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Assam/Naming convention
*Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Assam#Naming conventions
-Deepraj | Talk 13:08, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:The Sheila Divine

message: They were fabulous --Selach 13:08, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

message: This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... article is of a band who has won multiple awards for over twenty years. Article needs references cited, not deletion  --Deathincarnate (talk) 16:12, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contested deletion
Talk:Quality (philosophy)

message: philosophers of wp! unite! help! what and where is the difference between the subjectively valued quality and the quality "as such"??? -- Kku 13:10, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I claim that this headline should link to Value_(ethics). The article here I think tries to describe 'property' or something alike. --Marttir (talk) 22:51, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: comment

message: Isn't 'value' a better name for this? I've always understood 'qualities' in philosophy to refer to properties - e.g. Locke's primary & secondary qualities. Thomas Ash 10:48, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name change in order?

message: There, I was bold to add. However, I am not sure how the earlier version now embedded further below in the article should be treated, concerning references for example (see sticky notice).
Ostracon (talk) 00:21, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Did I Qualify?

message: Would Locke really consider a shadow to be a secondary quality? It's been a while, but I thought the distinction depended on mind dependence vs independence. So, mass is a primary quality, because it's mind independent, but color is a secondary quality because it's mind dependent (or so Locke argues). Locke would elaborate by saying that color is a psychological phenomenon and wouldn't exist without someone to perceive it, thus mind dependent, thus secondary.
Anyway, I suppose what it comes down to is just taking a look at some of his writings. I'll do some research before I change anything. --Beala (talk) 14:28, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I would like to propose that a more clear statement is made in the article about emphasis in classical philosophy. I claimed earlier that Quality in the general philosophical sense is somewhat equal with term Value within Ethics context. --Marttir (talk) 00:46, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Shadow = Secondary Quality?

message: The statement "Quality is wealth", although taken from a verifiable and reliable source, is taken out of its context and has little to do with quality as such (i.e. independent of context). Perhaps a link to Quality of life would be more appropriate, as an example.
Ostracon (talk) 13:53, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quality as wealth? 

message: The image and the description of the "[m]ulticultural sign of quality..." is a bit odd. Not sure what it adds to the discussion, and definitely needs a citation. I suggest removal. Stephen.G.McAteer (talk) 02:32, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multicultural sign of quality? 

message: The definition states "an attribute or a property characteristic of an object".
Yet, can't quality not relate to a process and organization as well?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.63.48.44 (talk) 07:58, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is quality only for objects?
Talk:Rémy Di Gregorio

message: Any background on how this "Italian" became "French"?69.15.219.71 (talk) 18:58, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Italian name
Talk:Marsfield, New South Wales

message: This section is incidental to the subject of the article. It is not relevant. See wp:ROC and then wp:notnews. The text contains offensive biographic details. It should all be removed from the article. Bleakcomb (talk) 14:26, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Barking Dog Man 

message: I don't see how the photograph of street signs adds any value to this article.  Is it there to illustrate any particular point?  If so, that point is not made in the text.  If I don't hear back from somebody with a reason to keep this photo, I will remove it. --Gronk Oz (talk) 16:15, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: A week has passed with no comments, so it's gone.  --Gronk Oz (talk) 00:39, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photograph of street signs 

message: Since Ryde council now has a document outlining the source of all street names - it turns out that Herring Rd apparently was not named after the 'Battle of the Herrings', but after the 'Herring' family (whoever they were). I think this reference should be deleted. 
122.106.171.187 (talk) 17:28, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Herring Rd