Talk:Bob Cornuke

message: Why does an article of Bob Cornuke talks about Robert Cornuke? Are they the same person?
If so, an explanation is needed to clear things up for readers?--Wai Wai (talk) 04:28, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bob Cornuke? Robert Cornuke? 

message: I shortened the first two paragraphs of introduction without actually removing any information - words have ben removed, but not the sense they convey. I deleted entirely the third paragraph, as it sems to me not to convey any real information - it's Cornuke's views on the way he works - but if anyone thinks it's important I suggest putting it in as a section in its own right in the body of the article. I also changed "Bob" to "Cornuke", as being more formal and more appropriate to an encyclopedia. PiCo 07:22, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits to the introduction 

message: Update needed: The baseinstitute biography referenced (and noted as unavailable) is now at: http://www.baseinstitute.org/about/bioofbob.htm JCrocombe (talk) 13:37, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference 

message: This article seems very biased to me.  It is more like a blog on discrediting Bob Cornuke than a biographical piece.  It should be removed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Goodwordtoday (talk • contribs) 10:00, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biased Article 

message: The article is cited for POV violation. The article is clearly written in its present form to present a negatively biased viewpoint of the subject. PatrickDunfordNZ (talk) 06:22, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Exactly how does it fail our policy at WP:NPOV. You are supposed to have a discussion here to back uyp the tag, not just cite it. Please give some specifics if you want the tag to stay.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dougweller (talk • contribs) 18:45, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 

message: Cornuke seems to think he really is Indiana Jones. Mark Barna, "Ark hunter finds fulfillment in aiding orphans, THE GAZETTE, September 06, 2010:
...
“This is more meaningful to me than looking for Noah’s Ark,” Cornuke said. “But if I wasn’t Indiana Jones, going into poor places, I wouldn’t have found these people.”
Some Christians call into question his interpretation of the Bible, such as his dismissing the conventional notion that Noah’s Ark settled on Mount Ararat. Many Maltese Catholics dispute his placing Paul’s shipwreck in St. Thomas Bay rather than St. Paul’s Bay.
Reputable archaeologists say Cornuke’s claims are without merit.
“I admire him for a very active imagination and fairly successful business, but from an academic standpoint, he has not much credibility,” said Payson Sheets, archaeology professor at the University of Colorado at Boulder.
“The standard of such research tends to be very low, mostly wish fulfillment justified by a bit of wood, or an unusual shape in the earth,” scholar Thomas Wynn said of the people who’ve claimed to have discovered Noah’s Ark.
As for Cornuke’s ideas on Paul’s shipwreck, the anchors may be from the right era, but nothing connects them to Paul’s ship, said Wynn, an archaeology and anthropology professor at the University of Colorado at Colorado Springs. “You have to have a reason to link your archaeological find,” he said.
...
Cornuke's most notable claim now is that the Temples of Solomon and Herod never stood on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem. Those who like the idea like it a lot, but, it's not getting a lot of support from genuine experts. Anyone looking up Cornuke on here will expect to see something about it, will they not?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.156.95.130 (talk) 19:22, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cornuke has no "merit," but has a good business 

message: As appears to have happened before, this article had accumulated a great deal of poorly sourced religious based criticism. I removed the bulk of it, although there is a some criticism of the subject in reliable sources as well. I did this in response to a  complaint on the Biographies of living persons noticeboard. I have no objection adding back material from reliable sources if found, provided the article maintains a neutral point of view.  Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 02:24, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure we need to remove Tentmaker - for fringe articles we sometimes do use sources such as this, so long as they aren't BLP violations. In any case, the quotes above seem to come from The Gazette (Colorado Springs) so probably belong in the article. Doug Weller (talk) 12:35, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stubbing 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Bob Cornuke. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060820134337/http://abr.christiananswers.net/articles/article49.html to http://abr.christiananswers.net/articles/article49.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051218030649/http://www.pinkoski.com/files/index.php?id=36 to http://www.pinkoski.com/files/index.php?id=36
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:04, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bob Cornuke. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090805232334/http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4191/is_20060801/ai_n16662513/ to http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4191/is_20060801/ai_n16662513/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:05, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: At 1:54, after his joke about Barak Obama, he claims he is a former FBI investigator and SWAT team member with a PhD in "Biblical Entheology".  I'm not sure what Entheology is exactly, but its also hard to understand exactly what is saying.  Maybe he said "theology"?   
https://youtube.com/tVqSs0BLHiU?t=114
Valgrus Thunderaxe (talk) 02:29, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Academic credentials