Talk:Siberia Airlines Flight 1812

message: "On June 21, 2004, the spokesperson of Ukraine's General Prosecution Office stated that none of the 11 forensic examinations carried out so far have proven the fact of hitting the Tupolev-154 by a Ukrainian missile so the criminal investigation continued."
Due to it now being 2007, has the issue been resolved? If not, this should be changed to continues. But if it has, then a little something should be added to perhaps reflect the conclusions reached. Coradon 13:06, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update? 

message: March 15, 2001, in the Ukrainian weekly, “Facti I Kommentari”, Changed date in article to correct one.Bert Schlossberg (talk) 17:45, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corrected Kamenski interview date 

message: :Ukraine admitted it likely hit the plane with a missile.108.48.230.145 (talk) 09:31, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was the aircraft hit by a missile? 

message: Really did anyone look at this reference? the "Johns Hopkins" publication is a STUDENT newsletter. It isn't peer reviewed and the author has no prior or subsequent expertise. No military qualifications, no reporting qualifications, no terrorism qualifications, no international affairs or other qualifications all! They appear to be a medical undergrad student who wrote three articles "Op-ed" opinion articles in a student newsletter. 108.48.230.145 (talk) 09:41, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Esterhazy "Johns Hopkins" Material has to go 

message: On 20th July this was added:
:In court, in response to question 12 of Siberia Airlines about if the plane's autoresponder was turned on, court experts Burtcev, Kamchatnyy, and Shololovskyy said that the autoresponder was turned off or broken for the entire flight time, so the plane was probably shot by Russian air defense system as unknown flying object. They also said that Russian officials have not denied that. [19]
Emphasis mine. Is that right? Or should it be Ukrainian defense system? 83.137.249.34 (talk) 14:20, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Russia/Ukraine 

message: :In court, in response to question 12 of Siberia Airlines about if the plane's autoresponder was turned on, court experts Burtcev, Kamchatnyy, and Shololovskyy said that the autoresponder was turned off or broken for the entire flight time, so the plane was probably shot by Russian air defense system as unknown flying object. They also said that Russian officials have not denied that. [19]
I think this section should probably be removed, the source linked is a zip file hosted on what seems to be an entertainment site with no traceability to the original source that i can find. Given the timeline of the edit and the current ukraine-russian trolling of everything related to each other on the internet i would question its reliability and neutrality on that basis too.
This section too has a reference pdf in a zip hosted at the same entertainment site, again recently edited and with no traceability.
:None of the 11 forensic examinations[who?][26] carried out so far have proven the probability of hitting the Tupolev-154 by a Ukrainian missile.
::I've removed the paragraph sourced by a zip file, whatever it contains. The second section seems to be supported by a pdf that is perfectly accessible, but it's in Russian, so it's far from ideal.  It also appears to be a very poor quality photocopy of an original paper report and so the content of the illustrations cannot be really be determined. So it's pretty useless really. Martinevans123 (talk) 15:51, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are we being trolled? 

message: Why this article named "Siberia Airlines Flight 1812"? --0x0F (talk) 09:17, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: renamed --0x0F (talk) 09:19, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

text: I think it was Ukranian-NATOs act of terrorism 0x0F (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 09:22, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: In the English Wikipedia, flights are named after the carrier followed by flight number. See our naming conventions: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (events)#Aviation. Stickee (talk) 09:25, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  Use the ref tag, please... 0x0F (talk) 09:28, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure, the 2001 BBC Article refers to it as Flight 1812. Stickee (talk) 09:35, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  I must write a free e-Book about this inhumanity act of terrorism. The NATO are killers of many childen. (In Libya, Yemen, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Syria, and Iraq) 0x0F (talk) 14:20, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Can I read about it? Why was it done? Was Ukraine really on the side of NATO then? Or was this done against the government? Sinekonata (talk) 21:47, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title of this article