lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Bomarzo

message: :I've ceded all the photographs I took of the Parco dei Mostri — only of the Parco dei Mostri in Bomarzo, folks, not the other photographs on my site — to the public domain; for the reason why, see my diary, 21 Jul 2000. For the photos themselves, the directory is here. In case of doubt, images on my site that are free of copyright have URLs with ONE asterisk in them somewhere. (NONE, and they are copyright me; TWO, and they are copyright someone else, and used by permission.) Pilfer away, folks. Bill 12:51, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The owners of the estate don't allow the use of photographs taken in the premises without permission. I don't know how enforceable that is.--Error 14:15, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture

message: The birth and death dates of Pier Francesco Orsini (one of several members of the family with that name) need to be vetted from Dizionario biografico degli Italiani and footnoted, as there are varying dates on the Internet.--Wetman (talk) 17:32, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Dates

message: Are there two wives named Giulia Farnese? --Monado (talk) 01:52, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Wives
Talk:Criminon

message: Back in 1996 there was an investigation in to Scientology's fake "Criminon" front here in Southern California, the details of which were published in the alt.religion.scientology Usenet UUCP forum, and widely covered in a number of newspaper articles, not a single copy of which I can locate now.
If anyone has a copy of that report, I'd love to see it posted here so that it can be worked in to the extant article.
The research found that Scientology's "Criminon" did not actually exist as any kind of organization beyond mere Scientology core criminality. The "Criminon International Headquarters" in Studio City at the time was visited by private investigators prior to a proposed Federal raid on the criminal enterprise as a whole (which did not take place) and every "office" that Scientology listed as a "Criminon office" in the State of California was visited covertly, found to be either a mail box drop, or found to be a non-existent address, or found to be a residence or business office that had nothing to do with the criminal enterprise.
The "International HQ" in Studio City was empty, according to the investigation and the resulting report, only cardboard boxes filled with fraudulent advertising along with a photo copier machine, with rotting food and trash heaped outside of the apartment identified as Scientology's "National HQ."
The owner of the apartment complex which Scientology claimed was their "International HQ" was identified as a known Scientology agent with an extensive history.
Point being, "Criminon" was found to not actually exist in the real world, it was found to be a paper entity, solely the Scientology crime syndicate. Damotclese (talk) 18:12, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scientology's 'Criminon' Does Not ActuallyExist
Talk:Creolization

message: There is no link to the set of Creole languages articles etc. . There seems to be a communication problem due to different spelling (the "z" vs "s" dilemma).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creole_language &
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creole
:As it is, creolisation redirects to creole language and the creolization article as it stands here is not very enlightening. Eklir (talk) 18:56, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Hell Pizza

message: Was it really 1996 they started in? I'd only heard about it last year. Scott Gall 10:18, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: start up year?

message: Hell Pizza Is the BEST!!!!!!
Hell Pizza bought a soul. Might want to include in article.
http://edition.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/asiapcf/07/03/nzealand.soul.ap/index.html  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gardevior (talk • contribs) 11:39, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Hell Pizza - Owner of 1 Soul

message: When Hell opens in Australia, their number would probably be 1800-666-111 (reflecting the company's origins in New Zealand) or 1800-666-000 (reflecting that the store is in Australia, not New Zealand.) Scott Gall 21:50, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Phone number in Australia

message: On 14 August 2011, the Hell Pizza Facebook page stated "We can confirm that we have now contributed $10,000 to the KidsCan Charitable Trust." - KidsCan Update Hell Pizza Facebook page, "HELL regularly makes major contributions to local and national causes. One of the most recent was a donation of more than $175,000 to the Canterbury earthquake recovery/" - 
It seems there are a few sources/blogs/facebook  now reporting these details - at present I didn't find a reliable enough source to add it to the article - perhaps NZ editors can find one to update the article. - Youreallycan 13:01, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  $10,000 to the KidsCan Charitable Trust now paid 

message: This article sounds a lot like a series of press releases - maybe because of the focus on marketing.
I've made a start on cleaning it up but it probably needs more work. A bit more evidence of/focus on  notability wouldn't hurt CoronaryKea (talk) 10:34, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too much like an ad
Talk:Ferrari 348

message: criticized as "evil handling" by many reviewers.
Who? Please add sources, otherwise this would be categorised as Weasel-speak. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sgcook (talk • contribs)  06:41, 10 January 2006
: I agree.  In general this article needs to cite its sources much better. swaq 22:20, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced statement 

message: The Ferrari 348 was produced until 1995 (just the Spider in the last year, I believe).  This was changed to 1994 by an anonymous edit without a citation.  swaq 22:20, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have fixed this with some sources.  I have a book that says the production years too, so I might add that as a reference too later. swaq 21:15, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Production Years 

message: The F355 is merely an update of the 348. In fact, every body panel is interchangeable between the two.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.221.181.197 (talk) 03:40, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: No, as they are 2 seperate models (only 308/328 shared the same chassis F106), both 348 and 355 have different chassis and enginesYBSOne (talk) 18:20, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge this article with [[Ferrari F355]] 

message: Since Ferrari themselves always styled it in lower caps, why does the article use capitals? Opinions?  Mr.choppers | ✎  03:39, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't know. There are naming problems with some automobile articles over here so this is one of the victims. U1 quattro TALK 12:47, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: TB/TS or tb/ts
Talk:Philippe Jeantot

message: I can't find any verification of this outside of one article:
:As a diver, he set a world diving record, having achieved a depth of 501 metres (1,644 ft).
Anyone help? — Johantheghost 10:50, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, found something, but some more info would still be good. — Johantheghost 11:02, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diving record 

message: Badzil (talk) 21:31, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Book copying this article
Talk:Ilmari Tapiovaara

message: This is just to start as it says this is featured at the Finnish Wiki. Hopefully someone at :Category:User fi-N can improve this working from their.--T. Anthony 10:50, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I expanded it myself. Apparently it hasn't been a featured article in Finnish since September 2006.--T. Anthony (talk) 07:48, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Roboraptor

message: The above title added by Carcharoth 11:07, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I assume from the date of your comment that you mean this version. I agree, that was pretty awful. The article has since been rewritten/expanded, and looks a lot better. Just to answer your comment, some 6 months later! :-) Carcharoth 11:07, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewriting article

message: Roboraptors will not save you from theives Tar7arus 15:45, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Security

message: *References
*Context
*check content
*reassess once done
Chaosdruid (talk) 05:18, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Attention needed
Talk:AutoSketch

message: The story is not true. Autosketch has been published since 1987. Drafix company was bought in 1996. --Däädaa (talk) 14:17, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This should have been caught years ago. Some anon put that info back in 2006..  Added a "cite needed", and will pull that material if nobody provides a cite. --John Nagle (talk) 20:13, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  History / Drafix 

message: Is SketchBook the successor of AutoSketch?--78.49.206.182 (talk) 06:17, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: No. The two programs are unalike.  Sketchbook is oriented to artists and graphic designers and creates raster image files, whereas Autosketch is oriented to users who want a simplified and scaled-down version of AutoCAD that creates vector image files.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:30A:2C4A:1CB0:5CC:90E8:7428:ED45 (talk) 10:36, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Successor? 

message: This article seems to be largely copied from the book 'History of Computer Graphics: Dlr Associates Series' seen here: google books --duncan.lithgow (talk) 21:25, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagiarism 

message: I don't know if this is a relevant information for an encyclopedia or not, but it's a thing I remember fondly: Autosketch, or at least some versions of it, included a Connect Four clone, even if it had absolutely nothing to do with CAD! But I know that my memory is not a valid third-party source :) . The only written source I found for this fact (except for Youtube videos) is this site. 95.248.151.79 (talk) 17:29, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Connect 4
Talk:The Doctrine of Fascism

message: Good morning</b
I removed the quotation of Soames translation describing as Fascism as "Century of the left". There has been a lenghty discussion about this sentence, that one can find on the Archive 42 of the Fascism article discussion page. Feel free to readd the quotation in the form suggested by the discussion in archive. Moreover, I would like to notice that the introduced quotation was already in the lead (with correct meaning). Last but not least, this article deals with a work written in Italian. Therefore, authoritative for its interpretation is the italian original, not translations - authorised or not -  in any language. Alex2006 (talk) 07:04, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Alex2006, there is a problem with your rationale. The photocopies of contemporary translations that you summarily reject (with not even a hint why) do exist and are easily available on the Internet (e.g., here: ), while the "italian [sic!] original" is apparently not. If you have it or saw it then, please, post a link here. Otherwise, you are talking of the evidence that you have never examined. Moreover, since the available contemporary translations use the phrase "Century of the left" or "Century of the Left" but the article uses "Century of the right" then it has all appearances of falsification of the existing evidence. If you claim that "Century of the left" and "Century of the Left" were translation errors then you, and not those who are skeptical of your claim, have the burden of proof here. As a reminder, any "consensus" -- factual or alleged -- is not a proof of your claim. So, would you, please, prove it. Thanks. 172.88.206.28 (talk) 21:29, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

text: As written before, there is no consensus on this quotation, as you can read at the Talk page, archive 42, in the Fascism article. If you have new elements to reconsider this decision, plese go on that talk page, and open a thread again, thanks. Alex2006 (talk) 04:02, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Greetings. I am not really familiar with the issue, I just removed an overlink from the last edit. However, if you are pertaining to archieves, please do not just pertain to the archieves but do open the discussion again. No archieve has ever decided for the future times; the discussion takes now. Jayaguru-Shishya (talk) 14:06, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: No, you - maybe accidentally? - reinserted the text that I removed: please see the history about that. About archives and discussion, I invited the users who reinserted the removed sentence to open a new thread in the Talk:Fascism page, where the past discussion took place. But, if a consensus has been reached in the past, the discussion can be opened again if new facts emerge. Otherwise, there is no sense in discussing again and again the same issue. Anyway, what they are trying to do here until now is a typical case of POVFORK. Bye, Alex2006 (talk) 14:24, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, indeed I did! Sorry about that, wasn't my intention! :) Jayaguru-Shishya (talk) 10:59, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quotation from Soames
Talk:Sidney Cotton

message: date of birth is probably wrong - if he was flying in WW2 he wasn't born in 1938. Tim Fellows 11:11, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Just looking at correcting an entry about the first world war it mentioned he served with 8 Sqn RAF until he resigned in October 1917. So presumably as the RAF did not exist then it should be 8 Sqn RNAS rather than 8 Sqn RFC. Anybody know for sure as I can find very little evidence of his first world war  service cant find anything in the London Gazette although I have tried all the obvious combinations of search. Thanks MilborneOne (talk) 23:04, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: World War I

message: Following the divorce from his first wife the previous year, in 1926, Cotton married 18-year-old Millicent Joan Henry whom he had met in Canada" (please add:"with whom he had a daughter"
Also as they met in Newfoundland and it did not become part of Canada until 1949 Newfoundland should be the place where they met. 24.65.232.181 (talk) 22:37, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Between the wars
Talk:Kaho Naa... Pyaar Hai

message: i made some minor edits because i just saw this movie and the plot explanation was a little off.  Also i made some grammatical changes.  If someone would like to add some source material and do some further deets, i would be much abliged :) Killemall22 (talk) 13:49, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits 

message: * Zee Sangeet Awards --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 08:26, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Awards
Talk:NUMAlink

message: According to John Mashey's NUMAFlex Essay and various posts on USENET NUMALink and CrayLink are both marketing names, CrayLink being used after SGI aquired Cray and later changed to NUMALink after they sold Cray.  However NUMALink/CrayLink is an SGI developed interconnect having nothing to do with Cray, and the early naming of it was purely a marketing decision.--RageX 11:20, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

message: Is NUMAlink point-to-point like Intel QuickPath or AMD HyperTransport, or is it a fat-tree. mesh, or hyupercube? WorldQuestioneer (talk) 21:13, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hierarchical, mesh, hypercube, or point-to-point?
Template talk:Final Fantasy characters

message: I returned the format to its previous (coloured box) look, in keeping with the Locations template, as I think this one helps it to remain distinct from the text on parent pages. Leaving the box heading 'floating' outside the box tended to make it clash with page intro text. However, I retained the heading link and the proper italisised formatting (which I'll introduce to the Locations template too) and tweaked the box code and font size to reduce the width a little while keeping a single-line heading (which I guess was the main aim of the previous update?) >Gamemaker 11:30, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Format
Talk:Demotist

message: The term "demoticist" is also used in the context of Demotic Greek (treated under Modern Greek language and History of the Greek language, denoting a proponent of the use of Demotic Greek during the language disputes of the 19th and early 20th centuries. We might need some disambiguation measures. What are your views on how to implement them best? Demotic itself already has a disambiguation page. Lukas 11:39, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I suggest it be merged with Demotic (Egyptian) in keeping with WP:WINAD. — Zerida 02:03, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation needed?
Talk:Salagama

message: When I originally placed a red link to the Salagama caste in the cinnamon article in September of last year, I thought it would probably be a long time before we had an article, and if that, a long time before the article would be more than a stub.  I'm delighted to find a thorough and well-referenced article here, less than a year later.  Well done, and thank you!  — Catherine\talk 17:32, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Nice article!
Talk:Violence (role-playing game)

message: I've replaced the external link to the PDF file of the game (1.1 MB) with an external link to the blog article which originally provided the link to the file. I like the idea of providing the file (especially as it's under Creative Commons); now, readers can choose whether to download it or not from the link in the blog. Also, I've changed the "External Links" heading to "References", because the same blog article is the primary source for the fact that Costikyan released Violence under Creative Commons. - Salvor Hardin 11:43, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Poo

message: Amazing that an article this bad still exists in a mostly high-quality Wikipedia.
:Thanks for clearing up the vandauary 2006 (UTC)68.144.49.48 (talk) 19:47, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. —Nightstallion (?) 09:05, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion 

message: Just about every edit on this page is vandalism or someone reverting vandalism.  Shouldn't this page be (semi?)protected?
Richard W.M. Jones 12:22, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's nothing we can't keep up with.  Semi-protection is a temporary measure used to stop rampant vandalism.  Here, we've had eight incidents since September 1.  That's nothing compared to what some pages get.  Powers T 22:45, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rampant vandalism 

message: Someone vandalised the article AGAIN! Someone just went tglkhjidtjortjyhifyouhftihjyijhogtijhgyoi or somthing to that effect to nearly all of it. weeqgyepoopopopopopopopsgdffsdfgfgysdsdbsvbfui.
I'm not registered and i couldn't be bothered trying to fix it but someone has to. If you are reading this do what you can.  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 83.70.78.118 (talk • contribs) .
:* I think that vandal should be banned permanently for being so horribly uncreative. ~ Infrangible 03:57, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Note: there were some posts here that look like they got chopped up, but I'd have to search through the whole page history back to 2009 to find the originals.  —Soap— 19:48, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another Idiot! 

message: The Desolation of Smaug, video blog #11 has a section which uses the word "poo" in the sense of actor's makeup. That should be added here. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nmD5qwjeJws
Jerryfern (talk) 17:40, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poo - use as actor's makeup
Talk:List of Acts of Parliament of the United Kingdom Parliament, 1800–1899

message: What does the c. with number mean after most entries? Common Man 12:05, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Basically, it's a numbering system so 1801 c. 1 would be the first act passed in the session of parliament in 1801. It is explained in the article Act of Parliament
"Acts before 1962 are referenced using 'Year of reign', 'Monarch', c., 'Chapter number' - e.g. 16 Charles II c. 2 - to define a chapter of the appropriate statute book. Since 1962, the regnal year has been replaced by the calendar year. All recent Acts have a short title, or citation (e.g. Local Government Act 2003, National Health Service Act 1974)."
It's probably worth adding to the list in the intro paragraph though. Kurando 10:36, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please explain
Talk:List of Homicide: Life on the Street episodes

message: This is a generated list, so if there is anything missing, mis-formated, please tell me an I will relaunch my script. It will easier and faster ! The complete list of episodes (with descriptions) will be soon added.
Lvr 12:09, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I gather that some of the episodes were aired out of their intended order, is there a way to check this? See the main article on the series for some examples.NowhereDense 23:14, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: New List of episodes

message: Is there a site that lists the production codes for these episodes?  The reason I ask is the production codes on this page indicate some episodes are aired out of order, but on the pages for those specific seasons, the production codes are different, and order of airing is assumed to be order of production (which doesn't make sense, given the continuous nature of the show) Darquis (talk) 02:26, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Production Code? 

message: happiness and i think goods on this page Oatt daizy (talk) 19:49, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  physics 

message: why is the sun now days too burning Oatt daizy (talk) 09:39, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  sun
Talk:History of Rennes

message: Most seperate articles are larger than the section (of the same subject) in the main article. Like the history section in the main article of France and the article the History of France, but this one is smaller. Plus the main article is NOT large. Most seperate articles are created when the size of the main article reaches a certain size and the creation of new "break-out" articles are needed. This is not the care here. Propose that this article be merged. WikiDon 01:35, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate article...??? > Propose merge
Talk:James Valentine (musician)

message: This article lists his birth date as both September 5 and October 5 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.240.14.207 (talk) 05:19, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discrepancy 

message: The section "Dates" should be revised. First of, there's no actual source or anything and secondly, it doesn't state anything about when James was dating this mystic girl 'Jennifer'.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.52.90.78 (talk) 14:58, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates