lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Shin Joong-hyun

message: His YeopJeons band should be mentioned in the text of the article. Badagnani (talk) 02:21, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  YeopJeons 

message: Here's a source from The Japan Times that is useful if someone wants to use it.  Xfansd (talk) 20:48, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Helpful source 

message: Just watched a documentary on him and his stage/ nickname was not "Jackie", but "Hicky". The documentary was in Korean with English subs, on Arirang, and should be easy to confirm.222.122.3.90 (talk) 09:09, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: http://i.ytimg.com/vi/ajdYwX6zRqo/maxresdefault.jpg confirms this in the Hangul characters used "HIKI".222.122.3.90 (talk) 09:11, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nickname 

message: His life featured in korean wikipedia more.
I added his biography more.
His life featured in many korean internet sites, so i added many truth today.
 LSM1204 (talk) 16:03, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shin jung hyeon's life 

message: Shin jung hyeon wrote and produced two psychedelic folk albums to south korean folk musician. And he wroted many psychedelic soul song to korean psychedelic rock/soul girl group the pearl sisters.
So i added genre psychedelic folk and psychedelic soul. LSM1204 (talk) 15:33, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shin jung hyeon's genre 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) BilledMammal (talk) 18:20, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Shin Jung-hyeon →  – While Shin Jung-hyeon is in-line with more modern standards of transliterating Korean, that's not how his name is spelled in English-language sources, which have long established "Shin Joong-hyun" as the accepted spelling. (Similar cases like this being Park Chung-hee instead of "Bak Jung-hee").
If you look at the English-language sources listed in the article:
* https://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/04/world/asia/04shin.html
* https://koreajoongangdaily.joins.com/news/article/article.aspx?aid=3033390
* http://www.koreaherald.com/view.php?ud=20121108000933
* https://www.theguardian.com/music/2011/sep/15/shin-joong-hyun-korean-psychedelic
* https://www.koreaherald.com/view.php?ud=20091217000069
* https://college.berklee.edu/news/south-korean-rock-legend-shin-joong-hyun-receive-honorary-degree-berklee
All of them use this spelling. :3 F4U (they/it) 10:24, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 22 March 2023
Talk:Concordia

message: I don't believe that Concordia university in Montreal is named for the Lutheran document. Rather I think it is adapted from the motto of the city of Montreal; Concordia Salus (Latin: Well-being through harmony). Concordia University was formed through the amalgamation of Sir George Williams University and Loyola College. Loyola was originally a Catholic institution if i am not mistaken. Editdroid 04:52, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Loyola was indeed Catholic 132.205.64.80 21:28, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Concordia in Montreal
Talk:Gann, Ohio

message: Does anyone know where the name "Gann" might come from or originate from? Thanks. --Brasswatchman 04:56, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of the name Gann? 
Talk:FIVEaa

message: I have removed advertising from this article and rewritten it acording to NPOV.  Kathleen.wright5 00:38, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertising removed 

message: While we are unable to display a schedule within this article, are we allowed to display the names of the regular announcers? Caleb Bond (talk) 10:38, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Listing Announcers 
Talk:Ohr Somayach, Jerusalem

message: This information is relevant and important, as the opinions and outlook of the co-founder and dean (Rosh Yeshiva) demonstrate the type of Jewish philosophy and sect of this organization.Mrnhghts (talk) 04:44, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Enough is enough my friend. Please stop this edit war, as I wrote on your talk page. It has been reported here. Happy138 (talk) 16:21, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Positions

message: I'm concerned about an inappropriate edit that caught my attention earlier. As per convention (Wikipedia:Ethical Code for Wikipedians) and policy (WP:CONFLICT), it is inappropriate for a person to edit material which directly concerns them. Therefore, I'm going to revert and then improve the text removed in this edit. It just so happens that the text isn't stylistically up to snuff (according to WP:Style), but it is still inappropriate for it to have been edited the way that it was. --yonkeltron (talk) 21:00, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inappropriate editing 
Talk:Evil Clown of Middletown

message: Someone needs to point out what exactly makes a sign of any kind "evil." Massachusetts (talk) 06:53, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evil 

message: It's described in the article as "large", which is pretty vague, and its size can't easily be estimated from the photo. I'd be interested to know what sort of size the thing is. Contains Mild Peril (talk) 22:19, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It's like 2 stories tall for the clown alone and another 1 to 1.5 for the sign on top (plus it's off the ground a little). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.111.112.201 (talk) 16:04, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  How big is it? 

message: The main article was edited to mention a restoration and repainting in October 2011. I stopped by today (December 3, 2011) and did not see it repainted as described in the "Restoration" section. I took photos today and they look very similar to the photo now on the article (which I also took a few years ago). I would certainly appreciate any clarification of this discrepancy. --Lbeaumont (talk) 18:29, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restoration? 
Talk:I-74 Bridge

message: I know that the image of the bridge that had been on this article before had been removed due to licensing concerns.  So I took a picture of the bridge myself, and added it to the article.  The image I added is licensed under both the GFDL and the Creative Commons license.
JesseG 05:08, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo

message: So wait... does the Gateway Bridge not count? See http://www.visi.com/~jweeks/upper_mississippi/pagesB/umissB03.html —Rob (talk) 04:24, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Only suspension bridge across the Mississippi? 

message: As a youth growing up in the QC, I remember the bridge being a toll bridge.  In fact, if one looks closely under the Moline side of the span, you can still see where the toll booths were.  (There were offices under the roadway.)  What I don't remember is when it stopped being a toll bridge.  Certainly sometime in the late 1960s, or possibly early 1970s.  Definately several years before all the I-74 work.  Does anyone remember the date?
--Wws 04:45, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Toll Bridge 

message: It's the 19th Street Bridge in Moline.  It doesn't reach Iowa, but instead connects to Campbells Island. Will (Talk - contribs) 10:37, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  There's a bridge between I-80 and I-74 
Talk:To Love and Die in Dixie

message: Why is this page listed under missing sources? no other is, it seems.
--- Ben
:One line is still marked as "citation needed". Anytime the  template is used, it automatically flags it as having missing sources. If you want the page to get delisted, remove the disputed statement or find a source for it. Koweja 02:24, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, it makes it sound like he is saying "I'm going to fuck my girlfriend", but Fox is going it for a good reason though. Since bang has the same meaning as fuck if we are referring to literal meaning. TheBlazikenMaster 15:12, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Many of the bullet point items in this article could be organized into a section entitled Treatment of southern culture. This would push the article considerably toward GA status. / edg ☺ ☭ 00:26, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Trivia sections

message: From the intro:
:Country music singer Waylon Jennings guest-stars in his last ever screen appearance.
Umm, except...it's a cartoon, he doesn't appear, and he isn't voicing an on-camera character (his is a voiceover part).  So it's not his "last ever screen appearance", is it?  This needs to be reworded or removed 71.200.138.188 (talk) 03:35, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Screen appearance? 
Talk:Japanese military-political doctrines in the Showa period

message: This page seems to be half-way between an article and a list. I don't know how to classify it.  --JeffW 05:25, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The author Torun31, seems to be building at least two large articles about Japanese militarism and public education. Another article s/he just stared is Hito-Do which I've been doing extensive editing of the past half hour. Given the intensity of work s/he's been doing on Hito-Do, I expect s/he'll be coming back to this article to make it more like a real article and less like a list. I only have a passing familiarity with Japanese history on this topic (Barrington Moore's The Social Origins of Dictarship and Democracy, several surveys of Japnese histoy and maybe half a dozen academic articles on Japanese politics and militarism). So, I'm basically just taking what s/he says at face value and just trying to turn it into acceptble English. Interlingua  talk email 16:11, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Sounds very original research to me. --222.3.70.144 16:24, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Doesn't sound like it to me.  I'm no expert on Japanese history, but of the concepts and people here that I am familiar with, nothing seems like it should be a cause of dispute. (RookZERO 22:56, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article or list?

message: This subject could result in a very long, detailed, and meaningful article. Entire books have been, and continue to be, written on this subject, and this article could therefore surely work its way up to GA, A, or FA status. But right now, it's just a series of lists, with nearly no prose paragraphs. LordAmeth 18:16, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this article is very much still a work in progess.  I suspect it will be split into multiple articles or lists eventually.  (RookZERO 22:56, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: WP:MILHIST Assessment

message: In cleaning up the romanization, it may be useful to check this page: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (Japan-related articles) Dewobroto 19:38, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Romanization

message: There are at the moment four separate atricles that could be merged into one. Japanese military-political doctrines in the Showa period, Xenophobia in Japan (WWII) and Eugenics in Imperial Japan could all be sections of Militarism-Socialism in Showa Japan.
--Flying tiger 13:22, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Four Articles 

message: If no one has any objections, I am going to pull the NPOV tag off in a couple days. I see no apparent NPOV problem and there is nothing about it at all here in talk.  (RookZERO 23:51, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV
Talk:Xena: Warrior Princess: The Talisman of Fate

message: This game WAS released. I remember having played it way back in the past, like 1999 or something. I had a N64 and my brother borrowed the game in exchange for SSB. Not that it was a good game, though. Neither was the exchange, but that's another story.
*There was a second Xena game planned, but it was supposed to be an adventure game, not a fighting game like this one.  I've removed the "cancelled" category from this article.  CardinalFangZERO 06:21, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *I don't think so.  The only source I can find for this is IGN, who ran a speculative article about Titus developing a Xena adventure game.  It seems the game they were refering to was actually the Hercules game released in 2000.  Other than vague statements from Titus about their plans for the Xena franchise when they bought the rights, there's no evidence a Xena adventure game for N64 was ever in development.  There were adventure game based on both licenses for Game Boy Color, but I can't find any evidence they were released.  No major outlets seem to have reviewed them, though there is info on GameFAQs, so it's possible they were completed, but never released and the ROMs were leaked.  I wanted to write articles about them, but I wasn't able to get solid information and didn't want to just publish speculation.  Does anyone have more info about these? Ace of Sevens 20:53, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: There was a game that was supposed to be released on the N64 after TOF. It was not a sequel this game, though. It was supposed to be the second part to the Hercules 64 game released by Titus games. The Hercules game was released, but the Xena sequel (which was supposed to have tie-ins to the Hercules game) was not released. Assumable it could be do to the lack of popularity in the first game or the failure of the other Xena games (ie. sales). 71.98.5.145 20:19, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Xena N64 Game 2
Talk:Birth of the Beatles

message: check the articles in other languages and you will see that they are no articles, because of that i erased them. You dont need to cancel my editing 88.153.0.152 10:50, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Next time use the edit summary to explain to others why you did so. Otherwise it looks like an anonymous editor removing interwiki links. Which will generally be considered disruptive, and reverted.--ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk|Contribs) 10:57, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  articles in other languages 

message: Let's take a look at that.
*"The program was entertaining..." - OK, might be some POV there, but let's keep looking.
*"Included many of the expected elements to a dramatisation of the Beatles story." - Fact? Opinion?
*"Events are often telescoped to make the most of the time allotted." - In one scene, a week's worth of onstage pranks are pulled at once. That's not an opinion. That's knowing the story.
*"Background details are assumed more often than investigated." Also not an opinion; the romance between John and Cynthia is just one example.
*"The actors are plainly not experienced musicians." - An opinion, maybe, but certainly not mine alone.
*"An 'audition scene' introducing Pete Best's character, by sharp contrast, shows a drum flair the real Best never exhibited on any surviving recordings from the period." - I will ask once, nicely: Has the person who raises the NPOV flag ever actually seen this program? Or heard ALL the pertinent recordings of Pete Best, playing drums with the Beatles?
I will look for replies here; please do NOT leave them on my talk page. Especially not out of chronological order. Have a nice day. Zephyrad 05:39, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "paragraph that seems to be mostly POV"

message: I would support Pete Best's view that he was sacked from the Beatles for being too popular.
I have lived in Liverpool since 1973 and discussed this topic with women who would have been young women in that era.
Typically they described the after gig behaviour of many of the young women thus.
"They would gather around the drum kit because the drummer was so good looking" !! ( the best looking of them )
Ringo was no better at drumming but was a lot less good looking ( until he made a great load of money )
So you can work out for yourself how that would have gone down with Mr L and Mr Mc.
If you can get pictures of the fab four and Pete best in the early days you will be able to judge for yourselves. Domnal5 (talk) 19:03, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pete Best
Talk:Anna May Wong

message: Why did she get a doodle on Jan 22? --2607:FEA8:D5DF:F945:EC2A:FDE3:9E53:A19B (talk) 03:46, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:   significance of Jan 22 

message: A section title mentions "1945 film success", but nothing whatsoever in the article mentions it again, let alone elaborates on it. 2601:80:4200:F51:E8C4:A6F5:85C9:DC8A (talk) 04:21, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  1945 film success 

message: Does anyone else object to the current infobox photo? I think it's probably the worst one of her in Wikimedia Commons, and shouldn't be the first-up image in the article.
I propose replacing it with another. Almost any would be better, but personally I would favour this one:
Any comments, support, objections? Masato.harada (talk) 12:50, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox photo 

message: The lead has "Born in Los Angeles to first-generation Taishanese Chinese American parents..." whereas Biography (early life subsection) has: "Wong's parents were second-generation Chinese Americans; her maternal and paternal grandparents had arrived in the U.S. no later than 1855."
Unless I'm missing something, these statements can't both be correct. Heavy Grasshopper (talk) 20:22, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The lead is wrong. I've fixed it. Masato.harada (talk) 10:12, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. Heavy Grasshopper (talk) 09:06, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was Wong born to first or second generation immigrants?
Talk:List of Penn State football players

message: Can we get some article started on the PSU players that went to the NFL but are still red lines?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.163.100.199 (talk) 05:30, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Red lined articles

message: —Preceding unsigned comment added by GChriss (talk • contribs) 00:47, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Penn State Wiki Articles 

message: I removed the  tag and added the subheads "Starters and major contributors" and "Team captains" to indicate the inclusion criteria. Obviously, this criteria is open to further discussion/consensus building. —xanderer (talk) 20:10, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The criteria is obvious to fans like us. Maybe we could add a brief note at the top of the section. I do agree that the tag was silly. Dincher (talk) 23:19, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Criteria for inclusion

message: Do the lists have to be in ABC order? I think they should be in order of importance. I mean the NFL, CFL, Arena lists. The players, they should be in ABC order. Dincher (talk) 23:12, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Order
Talk:Finkleman's 45s

message: Should this be merged with Danny Finkleman?  There is a lot of repeated information between the two, and most of the unique stuff seems to be in the other article. --Ranadok 05:30, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

message: This page and Danny Finkleman disagree about what firm he was/is a stockbroker at.  I do not know which is accurate. Dehbach (talk) 03:05, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Disagreements

message: For what reason is this person listed in the "See Also" section?  I can't see any reason for the link.  He is not referred to in the article and his page offers nothing that refers back to this one.  Is this something that someone did to add to the number of pages linked?  99.245.230.104 (talk) 09:58, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed it.  99.245.230.104 (talk) 19:15, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Joel Feeney - why?
Talk:Ontario Regiment

message: What do people think of the two sets of honours now on the article?  Personally I prefer the shorter version (the one without the dates).  Cjrother 02:22, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed the second list.  In addition to the links being mostly incorrect, all of the honours were bolded when only some of them should have been. Cjrother 15:41, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Battle honours 

message: I think I had you as an instructor on my course a while back.  Fancy meeting you here!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by CplCHammaker (talk • contribs) 02:35, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sgt Lawrence 
Talk:Guttmacher Institute

message: "Though it advocates for the wide availability of both, and is associated with the pro-Choice movement, its statistical research is widely respected, and considered authoritative."
This reaks of POV. I changed it to very obviously state that it is a POV statement and nothing substantiated. {Unsigned: from 71.84.224.62}
:I'm going to remove the whole statement, lest a flameware erupt before sourcing begins. This statement does need sourcing, in either form. --NightMonkey 17:22, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: POV Issue

message: This article sounds like a Guttmacher press release.
--------------
Yes it does. I realize this article is just a stub, but it nevertheless borders on propaganda.DesScorp 16:19, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: major POV

message: What happened to their web sites? I can not get to any of them. I get the standard 'page can not be displayed' for all of them.
147.240.236.8 15:50, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Web sites? 

message: I find it odd that the bias section is just about how they, allegedly, are unbiased.45.43.101.69 (talk) 19:14, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Bias section
Talk:Flying (Beatles instrumental)

message: The vocals on the track, particularly those starting at 1:02, are rather accentuated. Though there aren't any lyrics, there is definitely vocal work, so my question is: Should the song be considered an instrumental? George The Man 07:52, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Otherwise-instrumental songs which include simple shouts or chants are generally classified as "instrumentals" (cf. Pick up the Pieces, Tequila (song), TSOP (The Sound of Philadelphia)).  The article clearly discusses the presence of the chant in the song; I think we're OK.  Jgm 13:36, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Instrumental?

message: we should also include Space Rock here, since it's mentioned in the article of the genre as one of the earliest examples, and it proves again the unbelivable inventiveness of the beatles.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.173.169.99 (talk) 10:31, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The genre was added without any input from any other editors. Radiopathy •talk•   00:12, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  new genre 

message: The article claims that the main melody (played on what sounds like a Stylophone) is actually played on a Mellotron.  Do we have a source for this?  Indeed, do the instruments simulated by a Mellotron include the Stylophone or anything which sounds like one?
It's known that the Beatles had a Mellotron (it was used for the intro of "The Continuing Story of Bungalow Bill"), but I'm sure I saw somewhere that the instrument on "Flying" is actually a clavioline, which sounds like a Stylophone on its basic setting. — 188.29.7.229 (talk) 22:23, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mellotron? 

message: There is a reference to this being the first instrumental written by the Beatles since "12-Bar Original", but isn't this also the only instrumental track to be included on any of the Beatles' studio albums? Not counting bootlegs, and the Anthology albums of course, which were released many years after the band broke up.  I doubt if any of the compilation albums or retrospective albums have even this instrumental. Shocking Blue (talk) 17:34, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Only Instrumental?