Talk:Chitral District

message: Hi Mhockey
I concur this referenced content deleted by you with regard to Kalash people in Chitral , for reason quotaions without context or explanation , should have had a an explanatory note , which I will add , or you could ..and then this content is reinstated .
Intothefire (talk) 05:48, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Kalash]] in Chitral

message: Intothefire (talk) 05:48, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: List of referenced content removed from this article

message: Languages of Khyber Pukhtunkhwa (Pakistan Census 1998) http://www.pbs.gov.pk/sites/default/files/other/yearbook2011/Population/16-20.pdf
Map being used in various articles pertaining to languages of Khyber Pukhtunkhwa is incorrect and biased. It is showing tank as Seraiki speaking which is incorrect as majority of people in Tank speak Pashto. It is showing Karak as Hindko speaking while we know that almost 99% of the population of Karak is Pashto speaking Khattak. It is showing battagram as hindko speaking while we all know that most of the people in Battagram speak Pashto. Similarly, it is showing Shangla as hindko speaking, which is incorrect as most of the people their also speak Pashto. Finally, it is showing Toorghar district as Hindko speaking while we know most of the people their also speak Pashto. I think all this show biasness or incompetence on the part of the person who included that Map. Furthermore, it should also be noted that the map fails to show that most of the people on western side of Mansehra and Haripur speak Pashto, while most on western side of D.I.Khan also speak Pashto. I feel that the Map has grossly exaggerated the number of speakers of other languages. Tigerkhan007 (talk) 17:22, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Languages of Khyber-Puhktunkhwa (Map) 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Chitral District. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150928012955/http://chitral.gov.pk/ to http://chitral.gov.pk/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140714152936/http://www.chitral.gov.pk/ to http://www.chitral.gov.pk/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:07, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Chitral District. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120428182719/http://www.nrb.gov.pk/lg_election/union.asp?district=70&dn= to http://www.nrb.gov.pk/lg_election/union.asp?district=70&dn=
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151110154333/http://ecp.gov.pk/GE.aspx to http://ecp.gov.pk/GE.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:50, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: There was previously a "languages" section in Chitral District, which was uncited and was removed in this edit in March 2019 with summary "remove unsourced claim(s)". Languages of Chitral was a redirect to Chitral District#Languages, which has not existed since that 2019 edit. It would seem more appropriate for this current text, created today (and upgraded by me before I realised the history), which has a couple of sources, to be part of the main article about the district. PamD 09:05, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Please remove this tag i created Languages of Chitral page secretly.103.255.7.41 (talk) 10:37, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

text: - Oppose - Chitral is a linguistically diverse area and that is why the article shouldn't be merged.  Also Chitral District doesn't exist anymore. SavageBWiki (talk) 19:41, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Languages of Chitral]] into [[Chitral District]] 

message: Shouldn't we merge the sources  as well? - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:35, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I could see one relevant source and I used it . Is there anything I'm missing? – Uanfala (talk) 16:44, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  This one? - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:51, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't use that because it enumerates the languages of a much wider region. But if there's any specific content you'd like to add based on that source, just go ahead! – Uanfala (talk) 18:01, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  If you think this source is unnecessary then it is OK. Thanks for the merge . - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:13, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Languages of Chitral 

message: For what reason does this page have protection? 2A02:C7C:507D:0:E045:7934:D744:BD39 (talk) 00:00, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It got the protection in 2015 : there appears to have been a lot of disruptive editing at the time. I'm wondering though, it's been almost 8 years now, and it's likely the people causing disruption at the time will have now moved on. Pinging , who was the last to apply protection: do you think it could be lifted? – Uanfala (talk) 00:15, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure, let's give it a try. DMacks (talk) 14:46, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protection