Talk:Point Break

message: I just added a few wikilinks and fixed a few minor typos. This article doesn't need a whole lot more work to be fairly decent... Hurrmic 01:36, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I had a little trouble with some of the plot summary and changed it to what I think is a little better. For instance the previous version said a conflict was created in Utah's mind as he learned that Bodhi was a criminal, but there's nothing said or hinted at in the movie to indicate this. I reduced it to "finally unable to shoot his friend", which leaves a hint that there was that conflict. It's not actually clear why he didn't fire at him.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Friendly person (talk • contribs) 15:40, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  I added a few Wikilinks 

message: There is a questionable addition in the quotes section: "You're just young, dumb, and full of cum!" = Harp
Was that really from the film?
Yes, it was stated early in the film.
No. This quote is wrong. Actual quote: "You're a real blue flame special, aren't you, son? Young, dumb and full of come, I know. What I don't know is how you got assigned here. Guess we must just have ourselves an asshole shortage, huh?"
Come on! Have we no standards? Gees.
You're correct, but when referring to the "body fluid", I believe it's spelled "cum". The "standards" should be to get it correct. You didn't write the line, you're just quoting it. 24.189.35.249 (talk) 15:51, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quote? 

message: References and inspiration are two separate sections mentioning Hot Fuzz, shouldn't these be merged or something? cyclosarin 05:19, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References and inspiration 

message: :Image:Expresidents.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 21:53, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Expresidents.jpg

message: Who were the presidents portrayed? Was it Nixon, Ford, Carter and Reagan? USN1977 (talk) 17:57, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: They are Reagan, Nixon, Carter and Johnson. --ElTio (talk) 05:13, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: And Nixon has a long nose, like Pinochio.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Friendly person (talk • contribs) 23:36, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ex-presidents 

message: Is Patrick Swayze to appear in the sequel? His pancreatic cancer would make it very difficult. P Cezanne (talk) 19:38, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sequel

message: Nothing is mentioned in the article about the distinct homoerotic nature of the relationship between Swayze and Reeves. Watch the film again - it's clear as day. They make a lovely couple and seem to spend a lot of the film gazing hungrily at each other. It must be a cult gay hit, surely. Such a great film. --Spanglej (talk) 14:52, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Because it's all in your imagination? danno_uk 19:50, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Homoerotic subtext

message: Sheryl Crow's page says that "Hundreds of Tears" is on this soundtrack but this page does not support that.  Amazon.com agrees that its on there and does not mention many of the tracks on this page.  The soundtrack it lists is:
1. Nobody Rides For Free - Ratt
2. Over The Edge - L.A. Guns
3. I Will Not Fall - Wire Train
4. I Want You - Concrete Blonde
5. 7 And 7 Is - Liquid Jesus
6. Smoke On The Water - Loudhouse
7. My City - Shark Island
8. Criminal - Public Image Limited
9. So Long Cowboy - Westworld
10. Hundreds Of Tears - Sheryl Crow 
These tracks are not listed on Amazon (who may be wrong) but these tracks are listed here:
    * Jimi Hendrix – "If 6 Was 9"
    * School of Fish – "Rose Colored Glasses"
    * Little Caesar – "Down to the Wire"
    * Ice-T – "Original Gangster"
    * Mark Isham – "Foot Chase" 12.162.122.5 (talk) 19:12, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Hundreds of Tears

message: I made a legitimate edit with a correct reference, who is the vandal that keeps undoing my addition???  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.163.44.12 (talk) 20:17, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Every user who has come across your edits has removed them, and every time a reason was given. You linked a YouTube video which is not a proper source, the content itself was not encyclopedic, and your determination that this constitutes some form of Point Break's legacy is Original Research. Nothing contained in your edit has a modicum to do with the subject matter of the article.JesseRafe (talk) 01:16, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

text: I was about to open a discussion here, but one more focussed on the edits themselves. I welcome discussion at the new section Talk:Point Break#References to Whiplash in legacy section. Willondon (talk) 12:21, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: I am being vandalized then called a vandal!!!

message: I have reverted the recent move to Point Break (1991 film). I understand why it was done, and it may well need to once Point Break (2015 film) is released, but for now this article should remain the primary topic. Also, WP:RM is much better in this instance than a bold move that doesn't even attempt to fix all the inbound links. —Xezbeth (talk) 13:17, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Point break. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 21#Point break until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Jauerbackdude?/dude. 01:56, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Point break" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]