Talk:Structural violence

message: Structural abuse also exists and could/should be merged.  See Talk:Structural abuse#Merge.  Don't know much about it, but it does seem to be a minority position, though notable enough to have its own article.  Community psychology would probably have something to say about this... WLU (talk) 16:44, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: Intro says:  Since structural violence affects people differently in various social structures, it is very closely lysoled to social injustice.
What does that mean?  Can we assume it's a typo?
Should the word "lysoled" be "related"?  
75.121.35.17 (talk) 15:39, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "lysoled"? 

message: Really no critic of that concept? --41.151.19.236 (talk) 19:53, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism 

message: Facts are backed by references (Galtung, Gilligan, Kelly, etc.), and references/citations are made clear.
Needs elaboration on the effects of those in poverty, with facts and statistics about how they are affected.
A section on the structural violence that takes place in the US could be helpful to put a perspective on the local effects.
The links throughout the article seem to be working as expected.  Jadcruz (talk) 06:08, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Critique 

message: Overall, I feel like this article is heading in the right direction but at the same time, is very under developed. There are many different topics such as racism, religion, culture, and wealth class; that could possibly be sections in this article. These topics will give a better background on the overall topic of structural violence. Structural violence is a very broad topic and a lot of the topics that go under this topic branches off to racism, culture discrimination, etc. What would be best for this article to get a touch on all these different branches but not go to go full depth since there are other separate articles that cover the topic. A good summary would fit best as well as a link to all the other topics to this article. Regarding the access to healthcare part in the article, it seems a bit out of place and either needs something to lead up to it or rather get re-modified or deleted. Overall, this article is headed in a good direction but there is a lot of work to be done. Keep up the good work!
Austinx1997 (talk) 21:24, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cultural Violence & Wealth Class 

message: No mention of homophobia as structural violence? Is this omission an example of structural violence in action? Gymnophoria (talk) 13:09, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Homophobia 

message: Is it even right to call this a form of violence if it's not physical force?   If it's not violence, then it's more accurately the broader term of structural abuse.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.122.95.30 (talk) 04:49, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition of Violence 

message: Intro reads, 'as it is avoidable, structural violence is a frequent cause of premature death or disability'. This is a non sequitur. The conclusion does not necessarily follow from the premise. Many things are avoidable. Only a few of them cause death or disability. Crawiki (talk) 11:16, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non sequitur 

message: — Assignment last updated by EliasSpence84 (talk) 05:35, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: The Anthropology of Violence