lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Eden Camp Museum

message: Some of the flags at the entrance of Eden Camp are historically incorrect. the flag of America has too many stars and the canada flag is too modern. Also there is no aparthied (or any) flag of South africa even though they fought in the war  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mortifiedduck (talk • contribs) 13:04, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: You'll need to tell the museum management about that. pablo 13:29, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  historically incorrect 
Template talk:Alpha Phi Alpha articles

message: I don't know if we need the first sentence which states "this article is a series. . ." because this really isn't an article.
Add these to Associations
*Head Start
*Boy Scouts of America 
*Big Brothers Big Sisters of America
You may just want to provide a link for General Presidents to this template, Template:Alpha Phi Alpha General Presidents
See also Template:Alpha Men First Accomplishments
I would would keep the section "other related articles" but I would create a seperate section entitled Prominent Members (or something similar).  The related articles should be where Alpha Phi Alpha appears such as Jena Six, Cathy Cox, etc.  You might also consider adding some of the topics the World Policy Council has written reports about, namely Extraordinary rendition, AIDS, Millennium Challenge Account, Israeli-Palestinian conflict, et. al.--Ccson 14:40, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't mean to include individual members and I wanted you to use the presidents template instead of the list of 32 names you have listed.  I have updated the draft for what i envisioned.  Instead of making this an article, I also think you should consider making this a template that can be imbedded into articles.--Ccson 03:05, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Feedback

message: Your suggested changes have been added.
The intent of the template is to place it on specific Alpha articles (Alpha Phi Alpha, List of Alpha Phi Alpha brothers, Jewel's pages, etc.) to create an easy accessable web.
My only concern about the Prominent Members section is that it may become very long if we try to include each individual Alpha man's page (much like the African American topics template. If we keep it general (List of Brothers, Alpha Firsts, etc) it should remain compact and okay.
I definately welcome additional comments or criticism about the template.Absolon S. Kent 16:42, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't mean to include individual members and I wanted you to use the presidents template instead of the list of 32 names you have listed.  I have updated the draft for what i envisioned.  Instead of making this an article, I also think you should consider making this a template that can be imbedded into articles.--Ccson 03:05, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggested changes have been added to the draft

message: I moved the finalized template. The code is . I guess we can start to add it to relevant articles. Absolon S. Kent 13:33, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Finished (for now)
Talk:1935 Philippine presidential election

message: He revived the Republican Party only for his intention to run for presidency in 1935 
                                      Elections. 49.145.167.2 (talk) 00:01, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ge 2
Talk:1937 Philippine women's suffrage plebiscite

message: There are a lot of important information that are lacking in this particular article. First, there is no background information about the organizations in the Philippines that led to pursuing women to vote. In addition to that, information about the objectives of the organizations should be included to give a more reference. For instance in 1906, Association Feminista Llonga was created, and Association Feminista Filipina which was founded in 1905 and their objectives were socio-civic matters such as prison reform, improving the education, maternal care, and such. 
Another important fact I think should be incorporated in this article is the fact that the opposition for women's suffrage in the Philippines were not only men but also women. http://womensuffrage.org/?p=696
Jinnhee (talk) 22:23, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: There are a lot of important information that are lacking in this particular article. First, there is no background information about the organizations in the Philippines that led to pursuing women to vote. In addition to that, information about the objectives of the organizations should be included to give a more reference. For instance in 1906, Association Feminista Llonga was created, and Association Feminista Filipina which was founded in 1905 and their objectives were socio-civic matters such as prison reform, improving the education, maternal care, and such. 
Another important fact I think should be incorporated in this article is the fact that the opposition for women's suffrage in the Philippines were not only men but also women. http://womensuffrage.org/?p=696 Is this perhaps due to an influence of culture/religion? (Some women think that men should be the ones that should "be responsible" in politics...?) 
And lastly, the article mentioned the Commonwealth Act No.34, but does not further expand what it entails because the plebiscite vote was ratified by Commonwealth government National Assembly. Commonwealth Act No.34, which in long was called An Act To Provide For The Holding Of A Plebiscite On The Question Of Woman Suffragehttp://source.gosupra.com/docs/statute/874 provides a list of rules and regulations for the plebiscite to happen. I think this would be useful information to incorporate into the article. 
Jinnhee (talk) 22:24, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contributions to the article
Talk:Dos Palmas kidnappings

message: National Geographic has a TV special which says that at the time of the final rescue, there were only 3 people left in the hostage group. I just saw it on TV last night. 98.118.62.140 (talk) 11:46, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  NatGeo says... 
Talk:2001 Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao expansion and inclusion plebiscite

message: This article must be reorganized. After seeing the map and side bar, I realized that the article refers to Philippines. But other than that, the article explains nothing. There should be an introductory sentence as well as a background section explaining the reason of the plebiscite. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 07:35, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Organization of the article 
Talk:Julio Cervera Baviera

message: According the link:
http://www.rtve.es/television/20130212/julio-cervera-sin-hilos-inventen-ellos/607969.shtml
Julio Cervera didn't worked with Marconi.
Cervera visited all european workshop  to study the advances on radio.
Julio Cervera had his own developement similar to others at same time.
This documentary has interviews with many Cervera's biographers  and proffesors.
And it's said "for the italians the inventor was Marconi, for the americans was Tesla, ... the radio has many fathers"
Anyway Cervera was a amazing polifacetic man.  
 (Jprozas2 (talk) 19:26, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Invent or not invent? 

message: It seems somebody has forgotten to say that though Marconi was the first to send Morse code signals, Cervera was the first to transmit human voice. I think is quite important to clarify it. 87.221.78.234 (talk) 20:26, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Fact comes up nowhere, got a source? Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 22:28, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The first who transmitted human voice
Talk:Sisters of Notre Dame de Namur

message: The passage below reads as if it were copied from a partisan pamphlet. Moreover, it's not sourced, and given that it's making an extraordinarily strong claim, some authoritative support is necessary. King William I of the Netherlands attempted to establish a religiously neutral state, which some Belgian Catholics interpreted as an attack on the Catholic Church in Belgium. 
"...owing to the persecution of religious institutes by William of Orange-Nassau, King of the Netherlands. To compel them to remain in status quo, to hold diplomas obtained only after rigid examinations in Dutch and French by state officials, to furnish almost endless accounts and writings regarding convents, schools, finances, and subjects, were some of the measures adopted to harass and destroy all teaching institutes; but Mother St. Joseph's tact, clear-sightedness, and zeal for souls saved the institute. During his tour in 1829, King William visited the establishment at Namur and was so pleased that he created the mother-general a Dutch subject. The Revolution of 1830 and the assumption of the crown of Belgium by Léopold of Saxe-Gotha put an end to the petty persecutions of religious."
Batavicus (talk) 23:42, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality and point of view problem

message: I plan to update the material in the article on Sisters of Notre Dame de Namur. The material that is there is correct but outdated. The  material came from a  article in 1921 the Catholic Encyclopedia. It needs the updating. Rig8ney 14:50, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Issues
Talk:2007 Croatian coast fires

message: Why is this season really singled out? Secondary sources should be shown that compare it to other seasons, to establish notability. Particularly notable events like the Kornati deaths could get their own article anyway. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 20:45, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: IIRC, 2007 was a year of particularly severe forest fires in Europe. 159,000 hectares in Croatia sounds rather bad. (No ref on that though, and no comparison to other years, as duly noted.) I still feel the article meets the threshold, but needs to be clearer in explaining the significance of events apart from the Kornat incident. GregorB (talk) 15:23, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Synthesis 
Talk:HMS Agamemnon

message: Despite this being a page for Royal Navy ships, the SS Agamemnon is such a historically important ship that some mention of her should be included (so if someone reads something about "the Agamemnon", they have a chance of identifying the right one). ThoughtIdRetired (talk) 15:51, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  SS Agamemnon (1865)
Talk:HMS Bacchante (F69)

message: Irrespective of the sockpuppetry, it was my impression that the burden of evidence rests with the editor who wants information included. What's the source for the change in armament in 1980? I'm not seeing it. Rather, one of our sources shows a rusty F69 with a forward gun turret in 2005, indicating that the gun wasn't removed. , can you comment on why you reverted those changes? Huon (talk) 21:51, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  1980 refit?
Talk:Mark XIV bomb sight

message: > The task was contracted out to the Sperry Gyroscope Company, who re-engineering it to meet American standards, 
What does this actually mean?Blaise (talk) 20:39, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It usually means that historically-different standard things like screw threads are changed from UK ones (BSW or BSF) to US ones such as AF, etc. Also some dimensions may be changed slightly to allow use of different bar stock sizes, tolerances/clearances, etc. I've added a link in the article. Ian Dunster (talk) 09:49, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's worth pointing out that such a conversion is not as simple as it might seem. As the "computor" is driven by mechanical motion of parts, any changes in those parts, even due to different sets of measuring units, can cause it to be wildly inaccurate. It was no mean feat for the UK and US versions to be built on separate drawings and still be 100% interchangeable! Maury Markowitz (talk) 12:12, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Not titled

message: Doesn't look like a published source. Keith-264 (talk) 23:51, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: It must have been, I have a copy! Maury Markowitz (talk) 12:35, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

text: Found a current link here in the archives. Maury Markowitz (talk) 11:36, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Air Publication AP 1730A 

message: What's up with the title and bolded term in the first sentence? Is this a "bombsight" (like the article prose uses), "Bomb Sight" (like the bolded term) or "bomb sight" (like the title, and possibly the preferred term in the UK)? — This, that and the other (talk) 10:21, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming 

message: Hi Maury and other interested editors. This is to let you know that as a part of preparing this article for TFA I will be lightly running an eye over it for MoS-compliance and grammar, and possibly tweaking a little of the language to ensure that it is at it's very best for its appearance on the main page. If you have any queries about any of the edits don't hesitate to let me know. Thanks. Gog the Mild (talk) 19:48, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pre-TFA review
Talk:Guobiao

message: Bridgeplayer, I think you may have misunderstood the hatnote. Here's what happened. The RfD participants who created the disambiguation page did so at National Standards.  However, this contraverts Wikipedia's article capitalization rules: it should have been National standards. So I moved that page from National Standards to National standards.  Now, I could have left National Standards as a redirect to National standards, but the proper noun National Standards has a separate significance as the translation of Guobiao, so I thought it best to redirect it to Guobiao with the hatnote disambiguation to National standards. The alternative, equivalent solution would have been to keep National Standards redirected to National standards, and create a disambiguation entry for Guobiao there. The state after your edit was neither of these.  It refers National Standards to Guobiao with no mention of the disambiguation page created at National standards as a result of the RfD. I think you mistakenly reverted my edit because you hadn't realized this, so I've rereverted it, but if that's not so, let's please discuss it. Thanks. --Bsherr (talk) 02:01, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Your second solution, namely "The alternative, equivalent solution would have been to keep National Standards redirected to National standards, and create a disambiguation entry for Guobiao there" is what I have implemented. The problem with the alternative is that everyone searching for "National Standards" will have to go via Guobiao. My feeling is that Guobiao is likely to be very much a minority search target and it is better to send them to the disamb page. Bridgeplayer (talk) 02:09, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, I beg your pardon. I didn't understand that from your edit description here.  Ok! --Bsherr (talk) 02:14, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No probs; I'll try to make clearer edit summaries :-) Bridgeplayer (talk) 02:21, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [[National Standards]] vs. [[National standards]]
Talk:HMS Thames (N71)

message: Someone should check the photograph that illustrates this article as it is not a RN vessel.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.38.11.192 (talk) 23:14, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The designation 'HMSM' stands for His/Her Majesty's SubMarine but is properly written HMS/M  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.148.220.237 (talk) 18:08, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:German Armed Forces Deployment Medal

message: This article should rather be called "German Armed Forces Campaign Medal", since the medal is awarded for campaigns outside of Germany, not for general service.
Yes if it was done the American way it could be called a Campaign medal. But when you translate it form the German name Einsatzmedaille der Bundeswehr to English it's called the German Armed Forces Service Medal. EHDI5YS 23:51, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Once again close but still a miss, The last translation is also inaccurate. "Einsatz" means "deployment" or "mission". "Dienst" means "service" or "duty". A) My wife is German and B)I used de.wiktionary.org to translate "Einsatz" and I got this:
 & 
Einsatz (genitive Einsatzes, plural Einsätze)
#use 
#effort 
#risk 
#(games) stake 
#(military) mission 
In reality this article really doesn't need to be renamed at all. --Dandvsp (talk) 00:37, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Rhodococcus fascians

message: The article was created 23:12, 3 March 2007 by User:Giant Kumquat, immediately including most of the detail about the operons and genes attR & attA-attH. From April-September 2007, about 25 spelling problems were fixed; in October (after 8 months) 50 spellings were fixed, along with formatting of phrases. -Wikid77 15:27, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Created

message: 18-Oct-2007: I fixed most remaining spelling problems (perhaps 50), while adjusting phrases in sentences.  The following list of the original words might help further editing:
* "cicle" for cycle, "sistem" for system, "throught" for through, "wich" for which;
* "cultures" was "colture", "synthesis" was "syntesys/synthesys"; "tissue growth" was "tisuess groth", "until" was "till";
* misspellings as: "synthoms/ trascrptional/ neede/fro/ compuonds/ inensity"
* misspellings as: "syntesis/ codifys/ avioid/ hormon/ neded/leafes/groth"
* genus was "genre", rough was "rought", lacking was "missing of" & sources/culture were "souces/colture";
The spelling problems, lasting 8 months, were embedded in a mass of technical terms, wondering if "groth" (growth) or "syntesys" (synthesis) & other words were technical terms.  Logically, the article seems coherent, but I did not verify sources or biological accuracy of the concepts in the article. -Wikid77 15:27, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup clarity October 2007
Talk:British Porpoise-class submarine

message: The infobox says that the main motors were capable of producing 12000HP. This seems rather high :-)
I have found a link http://britsub.x10.mx/html/boats/porpoise_class/porpoise_class.html that lists the power as 5000HP, which seems more reasonable. I'm looking for a definitive source (perhaps a suitably old Jane's Fighting Ships). Fido frog (talk) 04:17, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Electric motor power
Talk:HMS Artemis

message: and others:  Having looked at this page I think there are only two true HMS Artemis entries: the real and the fictional (C. S. Forester). I propose we redirect this page to the real, with a hatnote to the fictional, moving the other entries as required to Artemis (disambiguation).  Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:02, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. There are a few pages like this where fan stuff has spawned them and I had not thought of a way to deal with them. This seems like the best way to do it. Llammakey (talk) 11:36, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 15:51, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal
Talk:Cyborg Slunks

message: The 'unofficial' listing:
Dawn of the Cyborg
Living Robot Experiment
Atomic Slunk
Space Cadillac
Congregation of the Cyborg Slunks
... is what iTunes lists as the track names.  Sounds official to me, even though buckethead didn't write in the names of the tracks on my CD.
--76.118.215.233 (talk) 03:59, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:HMS Audacious

message: The two sentences on this are contradictory.  The second is unreferenced, but is claiming a negative, so maybe not possible.  The reference to the first seems to have an error as it leads to a completely different ship, and I cannot see how to find the correct version. Davidships (talk) 23:40, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  ex-French ''Audacieuse''
Talk:Hepatorenal recess of subhepatic space

message: Hey, could do with a little more info. Please help!
:More is to come in due time. Until then, what additions would you like to see? --David Iberri (talk) 22:27, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: More info

message: This anatomical structure is named after the British surgeon James Rutherford Morison (1853-1939).  The correct spelling is thus Morison's pouch, with a single R. Prubu2 02:53, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This has been corrected in the article. Thanks for picking it up. --David Iberri (talk) 22:27, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling
Talk:HMS Avenger

message: Should we really be calling ships "she" instead of "it"? It's kind of a poetic usage, isn't it?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.92.120.89 (talk) 13:11, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "She"? 

message: HMS Avenger
armed merchant cruiser (hired), 15,000grt, 1915(b), 8-6in, 18kts, Torpedoed and sunk by U.69 off Shetlands 14/6/17
Source: http://www.naval-history.net/Oxon01-ShipList.htm  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.166.95.158 (talk) 17:45, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another HMS Avenger
Talk:The Broadway Album

message: RE: "Streisand, who had formerly represented only minor theater composers on her albums[...]"  
I don't think this is true.  Because in the sixties she sang songs by Harold Arlen, Johnny Mercer, Richard Rodgers and the composers of The Fantasticks. And as late as 1974 she sang a song by Stephen Sondheim intended for an album but never released.  So...I really want to delete this.  And I am going to. Because I think it is incorrect.70.125.140.200 (talk) 07:13, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Netball World Cup

message: I made the Template:Netball World Championship Nav based on the rugby one, which also includes  History of the Rugby World Cup etc. I agree there is little to no additional information on the pages Netball World Championship hosts or History of the Netball World Championship, but I thought that this will conceivably change in the future as more people add to them. Perhaps until then, they should be subsections of Netball World Championships. Thoughts?   Matt 15:37, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: certainly, if this page gets to 30KB, say, you could split out more sections and use the main article 1 paragraph summary method. dramatic 20:33, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Anyone know what the Netball Nations Cup, won by Papua New Guinea in 2008, is?  Aridd (talk) 16:37, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Netball Nations Cup? 

message: On the list of results of the different world cups, if you click for more details, the winners stated in the specific page for that world cup often isn't matching. For example, 1971, this page says Australia won, but when you click thr link it says Trinidad and Tobago won. Same with 1975, again say Aystralia, but the link says South Africa. Which is correct? 2A02:C7F:409D:E900:947:60F4:9EBF:4199 (talk) 06:47, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Champions not matching
Talk:HMS Beaver

message: It was unclear to me here whether what is meant was HMS Beaver (1855) or Beaver (steamship), the latter being the well-known Hudson's Bay Company steamship/service vessel; because of the HM indication in the citation on Farewell Harbour, I have pointed it at HMS Beaver, though without disambiguating it to redlink.Skookum1 (talk) 05:56, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: HMS Beaver (1855) appears not to be the relevant Beaver. The naval vessel was a gunboat that was so badly built that she never saw active service. I would not let the designation "HM hired survey vessel Beaver" throw you. Earlier in the century the Royal Navy made extensive use of hired armed vessels that it referred to as, for instance, "HM hired brig Telegraph. These vessels were not commissioned and so were not designated "His Majesty's Ship". The vessel you seek is probably the steamship Beaver. Acad Ronin (talk) 14:20, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  mention of "HM hired surveying vessel ''Beaver''" on [[Farewell Harbour]]