Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U.S. Roads/West Virginia/Archive 1

message: Hello. The WikiProject Council has recently updated the Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory.  This new directory includes a variety of categories and subcategories which will, with luck, potentially draw new members to the projects who are interested in those specific subjects. Please review the directory and make any changes to the entries for your project that you see fit. There is also a directory of portals, at User:B2T2/Portal, listing all the existing portals. Feel free to add any of them to the portals or comments section of your entries in the directory. The three columns regarding assessment, peer review, and collaboration are included in the directory for both the use of the projects themselves and for that of others. Having such departments will allow a project to more quickly and easily identify its most important articles and its articles in greatest need of improvement. If you have not already done so, please consider whether your project would benefit from having departments which deal in these matters. It is my hope that all the changes to the directory can be finished by the first of next month. Please feel free to make any changes you see fit to the entries for your project before then. If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you.  B2T2 23:01, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Project directory 

message: If there is no objection, I would like to nominate Seicer as either co-leader or vice-leader or something of this project. He or she is "da man" when it comes to WVR articles.  youngamerican (ahoy hoy) 12:28, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No objections here. =) --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 15:05, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'll accept the nomination :) I think my research within WVDOH and my partnerships I've made with many within should be noted. Now if someone can light a fire under my ass, I'll scan in some photos I have from WVDOH.  Seicer (talk) (contribs) 21:31, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[User:Seicer]] 

message: I revamped the West Virginia Turnpike Exit Guide, but how should I go about adding in the toll plaza, service plaza, and rest area information? Perhaps an amendment can be made to the exit guide template? But I'm not sure on how to go about doing that.  Seicer (talk) (contribs) 16:11, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately, the WVint templates weren't coded for the purpose of being used to design exit lists - only junction lists (believe me, when I came up with the now-standard coding, I attempted to add exit list functionality into it, but it failed miserably). For the exit lists, we should probably use WP:IH/ELG instead. Even though this is the guide for Interstates, some states (NJ and NY, and possibly more) use it as well. --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 20:34, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Ugh. It looks ugly at New Circle Road too. I think that I'll revert the WVTPK page back to the way it was... and use that template for other interstate pages within my range? It looked really nice.  Seicer (talk) (contribs) 21:32, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, the template was designed for state routes only, but I suppose it can be used for interstate pages in select spots. --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 23:05, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I reverted and updated the list. It looks MUCH nicer in this manner, so perhaps someone can make a template out of it for use elsewhere? I think that a convention and ruleset would need to be agreed upon.  Seicer (talk) (contribs) 00:55, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  WV TPK Exit Guide 

message: I think that this would be good to standarise as a template and use on other pages. Here is the sample: WV TPK Exit Guide.
It's split between Exit, Road, Destination, and Notes. For non-mileage-based exit states, perhaps a note such as: "This state does not conform to MUTCD exit signage standard. Exit numbers are sequential with the milepost indicated beneath it in italics." This way, another column that introduces clutter solely for milepost would not be needed since it would be duplication for the vast majority of pages.
Blue: Rest areas/service plazas
Lgt red: Toll plazas
Bright red: Restrictions
Yellow: Information
Tell me what you think. Feel free to amend the pages as seen fit.  Seicer (talk) (contribs) 01:34, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not bad. A note though: this would not apply to Interstates, as those use the exit list guide prescribed by WP:IH. For state highways, this format could work, although I'm not sure if I, or with the help of others, can create a template flexible yet concise enough to serve this purpose. Can't hurt to try, though... --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 02:02, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Oh shoot, I forgot about that. My minds been diverting elsewhere...  Seicer (talk) (contribs) 02:16, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Exit list format 

message: See: Roads of Charleston, West Virginia. Not satisfied with screwing up the redirects to it, the IPuser is suggesting it be merged. Can you imagine the page of roads being squished into an already lengthy city page? I left him a warning on his user page about his redirect screwup, but let's nip this one in the bud and vote to decline.  Seicer (talk) (contribs) 00:59, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've left my $.02 on the page, opposing the merge of course. --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 21:08, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attack on [[Roads of Charleston, West Virginia]].. again 

message: When I created SVGs for every state route, I used  to determine what state routes existed and, thus, needed shields. I have since realized that the template was incomplete and that a number of routes are still missing shields. If anyone comes across any routes missing shields, please post a message either here or on my talk page. Thanks. --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 21:10, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Using the List of primary state highways in West Virginia as a reference, I have made all of the missing shields, so we should be good to go when it comes to signage. --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 00:48, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Routes missing shields 

message: Does anyone know where I can find some sources for the route lengths? I've looked all over, only to come up empty. Any ideas? --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 23:28, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The WV highway map put out by the state has segment lengths (usually distances between cities or intersections). It can be tedious, but you should be able to consider it oficial. Plus, I am pretty sure that simple addition does not count as WP:OR.  youngamerican (ahoy hoy) 00:34, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately, it appears that WV does not offer their maps free online; instead, they charge a few bucks for each map. If anyone else here wants to purchase the map, please do so. --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 16:51, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Length sources 

message: Hello, all. It was initially my hope to try to have this done as part of Esperanza's proposal for an appreciation week to end on Wikipedia Day, January 15. However, several people have once again proposed the entirety of Esperanza for deletion, so that might not work. It was the intention of the Appreciation Week proposal to set aside a given time when the various individuals who have made significant, valuable contributions to the encyclopedia would be recognized and honored. I believe that, with some effort, this could still be done. My proposal is to, with luck, try to organize the various WikiProjects and other entities of wikipedia to take part in a larger celebrartion of its contributors to take place in January, probably beginning January 15, 2007. I have created yet another new subpage for myself (a weakness of mine, I'm afraid) at User talk:Badbilltucker/Appreciation Week where I would greatly appreciate any indications from the members of this project as to whether and how they might be willing and/or able to assist in recognizing the contributions of our editors. Thank you for your attention.  Badbilltucker 16:10, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia Day Awards 

message: ...and yes, my English class just read Hamlet. As of right now, using the  subtemplates (WVint/WV, etc) results in a boldface link being produced. This was a carryover from WP:NYSR, where the boldface was introduced to make reading the-then list in the infobox (Routeboxny, not infobox road) easier. After seeing the table be constructed on West Virginia Route 114 without boldfaced links, it makes me wonder if the boldface text is still necessary. After all, the boldface isn't used in exit lists. Thoughts? --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 22:55, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  To be bold or to not be bold... 

message: All of the USRD Clean-up Templates have been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. master sonT - C 16:50, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  TfD nomination of All USRD Clean-up Templates

message: In response to a few issues that came up, we are giving a reminder to all state highway wikiprojects and task forces:
# Each project needs to remain aware of developments at WT:USRD and subpages to ensure that each project is aware of decisions / discussions that affect that project. It is impossible to notify every single project about every single discussion that may affect it. Therefore, it is the state highway wikiproject's responsiblity to monitor discussions.
# If a project does not remain aware of such developments and complains later, then there is most likely nothing USRD can do about it.
# USRD, in most to nearly all cases, will not interfere with a properly functioning state highway wikiproject. All projects currently existing are "properly functioning" for the purposes mentioned here. All task forces currently existing are not "properly functioning" (that is why they are task forces). Departments of USRD (for example, MTF, shields, assessment, INNA) may have specific requirements for the state highway wikiprojects, but complaints regarding those need to be taken up with those departments.
# However, this is a reminder that USRD standards need to be followed by the state highway wikiprojects, regardless of the age of the wikiproject.
Regards, Rschen7754 (T C) 05:13, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reminder from USRD

message: As you may have heard, we at the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial Team recently made some changes to the assessment scale, including the addition of a new level.  The new description is available at WP:ASSESS.
*The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.  
*The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.  
*A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.  
Each WikiProject should already have a new C-Class category at :Category:C-Class_articles.  If your project elects not to use the new level, you can simply delete your WikiProject's C-Class category and clarify any amendments on your project's assessment/discussion pages.  The bot is already finding and listing C-Class articles. 
Please leave a message with us if you have any queries regarding the introduction of the revised scheme.  This scheme should allow the team to start producing offline selections for your project and the wider community within the next year.  Thanks for using the Wikipedia 1.0 scheme! For the 1.0 Editorial Team, §hepBot (Disable) 21:33, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes to the WP:1.0 assessment scheme

message: Hi!  I'd like to draw your attention to the new WikiProject coordinators' working group, an effort to bring both official and unofficial WikiProject coordinators together so that the projects can more easily develop consensus and collaborate.  This group has been created after discussion regarding possible changes to the A-Class review system, and that may be one of the first things discussed by interested coordinators.
All designated project coordinators are invited to join this working group.  If your project hasn't formally designated any editors as coordinators, but you are someone who regularly deals with coordination tasks in the project, please feel free to join as well. — Delievered by §hepBot (Disable) on behalf of the WikiProject coordinators' working group at 06:59, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinators' working group 

message: This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 04:09, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP 1.0 bot announcement 

message: There is currently a discussion taking place at WT:HWY regarding the potential use of coordinates in highway articles. Your input is welcomed. --Rschen7754 02:02, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: RFC on coordinates in highway articles