Talk:Life Savers

message: It's proper to specify a recommended retail price as a number of dollars (such as $0.05) or a number of cents (five cents or 5 cents) but specifying it as a "dollar number of cents" is almost always wrong.  (There used to be a joke, playing off "what this country needs is a good five-cent cigar" that "what this country REALLY needs is a five-cent nickel" and financial advisors distinguish between paying full-fare for something versus reducing taxes, so that one might pay for something in 72-cent dollars.  These refer to the value of the money, as opposed to the price of something.)
The AP Stylebook suggests that numbers under eleven be written out, and larger numbers be in numeric form, but prices in retail stores is almost always in numeric form.  I would recommend that instead of "$0.05 cents", that "5 cents" or "5c" be used, but "five cents" would be acceptable.  I didn't edit the page because I couldn't find that Wikipedia style mandates one over the other, but saying "$.05 cents" is flat-out wrote, being both a violation of logic and of ordinary literacy. (which sometimes conflict, but not here.) 68.50.226.190 (talk) 13:34, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Department of Redundancy Department

message: Why is there a Lightsaber redirect on this page? O_o
:As a small child, I thought Lightsabers were called Lifesavers.  Seeing this disambig, I guess that may be somewhat common. -SCEhardt 02:36, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I was bold and removed it. A mere phonetic coincidence doesn't warrant a disambig. Brian Schlosser42 04:59, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Lightsaber disambig

message: Weren't LifeSavers produced in Port Chester, NY from 1920-1984? Actually, this is a bit rhetorical as I know that the former factory is now an apartment complex. My brother-in-law used to live there and they have pictures of the building as a LifeSaver factory prior to conversion. How this relates to production in Holland, Michigan is beyond me. (Was this the only factory?) -HiFiGuy 07:09, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical Production 

message: Is this still a stub?  How much more is there to know about life savers. Ozone 00:03, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stub 

message: So, are Lemon & Lime discontinued?  I noticed that they are not listed in any of the other packs except the Original 5 Roll.  So, are they gone? Antmusic 20:22, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  So, are Lemon & Lime discontinued? 

message: Why is the launch of Bubble Yum in there? Exactly what does that have to do with Life Savers? I'm Kinda Awesome... 17:27, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Timeline...

message: :Image:Cremesavers.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 08:37, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Cremesavers.jpg

message: The idea that the creator had a daughter who choked on candy is a myth, I deleted any mention of it.
http://www.snopes.com/business/names/lifesavers.asp  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.141.237.35 (talk) 04:00, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It was re-added about a week ago - I've re-removed the mention.  In the future, please be bold in correcting obvious vandalism yourself. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 20:02, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: No Dead Daughter

message: The article still states the legend "is entirely true" -- this is very misleading and should state "it is an urban legend, and no connection between making the candy to save lives is present in the candy history." or something similar.
Wikipedia page (with the above error) read on 2/6/2010
http://www.snopes.com/business/names/lifesavers.asp  
72.177.170.133 (talk) 19:14, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It was re-added about a week ago - I've re-removed the mention.  In the future, please be bold in correcting obvious vandalism yourself. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 20:02, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: It still says the legend is true

message: Early in the article is says that Life Savers were invented in 1912.  Later in the article, it says 1911.  Which is it? Jtyroler (talk) 01:39, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year invented 

message: Hi Life Savers Wikipedia community –
I’m Emily and I'm a communications representative for Life Savers.
After reading through the Wikipedia page and the history sources we have, I wanted to suggest some changes to the page and see what the community thinks - appreciate your thoughts.
•In the History section, sentence four: "The pill manufacturer, whose machinery was malfunctioning, found that the pressing process worked much better when the mints were stamped with a hole in the middle." – Where did you get this info.? We don’t have record of this and because it's not sourced, would recommend deleting. We have some sources of info. that list the origin and reasoning for the mints invention (Fortune mag. 1938, Modern Packaging, 1951) and it doesn’t include this so interested to know where it was found. 
•	Any opposition to adding mention that 2012 marks 100th anniversary of LS?   
•	The logo up currently on the page isn't current. Thought it would make sense to add the updated one - thoughts?
 
• I also found an additional historical fact in some archives that I thought could be added: During WWII, other candy manufacturers donated their sugar rations to keep Life Savers in production so that the little candies could be shared with Armed Forces as a tasty reminder of life at home. Sources: Investor’s Reader (1950) and Modern Packaging (1950) - do to the fact these pubs. are so old, I only have hard copies.
Would love to get thoughts from the community on all suggestions.
Thanks.
Olsoneem (talk) 21:30, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Emily. Thank you for the ideas and the contributions.  I know we are a bit late in getting back to you.  The pill machine malfunction story was unsourced, so removing it is just fine.  The WWII story is a great addition, but needs a source itself.  You listed 2 sources, can you give the page number of the section relevant?  Also, we would love to have an updated logo, we just need to make sure that it's use constitutes fair use under copyright law.  Since it is the current logo, I don't believe we have authorization to use it.  Would it be possible for you to aquire authorization and upload a copy?  I would be happy to assist you, just leave me a message on my talk page.DoctorLazarusLong (talk) 22:07, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested Changes - Community Thoughts? 

message: The lede implies that they were named Lifesavers because they resembled life bouys, ie with a hole. Later the article says "In 1921, the company began to produce solid fruit drops. In 1925, technology improved to allow a hole in the center of the fruit candies. These were introduced as the "fruit drop with the hole"" So did they start with a hole in 1911/1912, switch to solid in 1921, then bring back the hole in1925? Or did they make mints or other flavors with a hole and fruit flavors without a hole from 1921-1925?  If  the hole was in the candies from the beginning to 1921, gone 1921-1925, and restored in 1925, the article should clearly state so. If not, the text should be cleared up. Edison (talk) 02:17, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: When did they get a hole in the middle?

message: Seems to be an abrupt shift from 1947 to the 80's. It would be nice to fill in the info on those intervening years if someone has the resources and time.THX1136 (talk) 21:11, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing history 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Life Savers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060308232557/http://www.commondreams.org/headlines02/0320-02.htm to http://www.commondreams.org/headlines02/0320-02.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:04, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Can you add a section about the Australian arm? There is only a link to the website. Is the Australian arm also independent like Birds Eye is? Jordf32123 (talk) 12:09, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Australia