lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Factor VIII

message: Review: doi:10.1111/jth.13215 JFW | T@lk 10:07, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Measurement of activity 

message: A relative (elderly, white, European male) has been told they have "a normal level of Factor VIII, 105.8". What is the normal rage in humans, and can it be added to the article? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:09, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Normal levels
Talk:Factor XI

message: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Classical_blood_coagulation_pathway.png
* thank you. 128.125.28.42 (talk) 16:55, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  add this picture 

message: Antithrombotic effect without increasing haemorrhage risk? doi:10.1111/jth.13005 JFW | T@lk 16:12, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  The holy grail
Talk:Familial hemiplegic migraine

message: Mutation of the gene that codes for the NBCe1 bicarbonate transport protein has been associated with familial migraine. () --IONTRANSP (talk) 03:35, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  SLC4A4  

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage.) Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0035378713006930. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  DanCherek (talk) 16:37, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Gardner's syndrome

message: Feel that Gardner's syndrome's merge with FAP should be made more clear in the introduction? It really isn't a distinct medical category any more.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.67.46.169 (talk) 15:23, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: note

message: I couldn't put this better than the author of a recently published paper:
"A variety of terms have been used to describe individuals with an APC-associated polyposis condition; FAP, attenuated FAP, Gardner syndrome, Turcot syndrome, or the recently described gastric adenocarcinoma and proximal polyposis of the stomach (GAPPS). The clinical features associated with these phenotypes are included here; however, all are now genetically defined as caused by pathogenic variants in APC. Terms such as Gardner syndrome and Turcot syndrome are of historical interest and should not be used any longer as both are now known to be part of the FAP spectrum. GAPPS was only recently described and the current phenotype is not yet well understood. Management guidelines differ between FAP and attenuated FAP. A consensus has not been reached regarding the precise clinical diagnostic criteria that distinguish FAP from attenuated FAP" Tmbirkhead (talk) 20:06, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Agree

message: This article should either be made more clear in the first paragraph or merged with FAP, and listed as an historical subtype.
Tmbirkhead (talk) 20:08, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with Familial Adenomatous Polyposis
Talk:Deletion (genetics)

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
Genetic deletion → Deletion (genetics) — To make consistent with Insertion (genetics). Deletion (genetics) would have been my guess for the correct title. —Seans Potato Business 10:17, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
This article has been renamed  as the result of a move request. --Stemonitis 10:47, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: Another common way to refer to genetic insertion and deletion is to use the term indel(s). However, currently this is only the city indel. There are also a few other technicalities related to this term. As an example see the NCBI "indel" inconsistencies: ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/hapmap/genotypes/2010-08_phaseII+III/inconsistencies/422_known_indels.txt . An example of this should be mentioned. Jahibadkaret (talk) 08:29, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure what happened, but seem fixed now... Jahibadkaret (talk) 11:56, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request of redirection from '''indels'''
Talk:Genetics of Down syndrome

message: There is something I don't understand, how would you, for instance, distinguish between a Down syndrome caused at the stage 1 of meiosis and the same at stage 2 of meiosis ? Thanks. XApple (talk) 14:23, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Meiosis 1 or 2?

message: How can a gamete contain both a 14/21 translocation and chromomsome 14 at the same time? Also, how can a gamete contain C21 on its own?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.16.154.143 (talk) 19:43, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in 'Possible Gametes from Translocation' Diagram? 
Talk:Richardson extrapolation

message: I suggest that some numerical examples should be given, showing the gain in precision and/or the difference of calculations needed for a given precision, e.g. for a method of numerical integration. — MFH:Talk 19:28, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

message: I don't know if "sequence acceleration" is correct here - personally I have no problem with the idea of sequences indexed by reals, but IIRC, on WP this is restricted to sequences indexed by N, while here we're typically in the case of a function of h -> 0. — MFH:Talk 15:57, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure there's a countable sequence there.  Though the theoretical underpinnings may look at limits as a real-valued parameter changes, Richardson extrapolation is a computational method, and it looks at sequences.  Typically one looks at the value of the limiting expression at a sequence of parameter values such as h_0, h_0/2, h_0/4, h_0/8, \ldots.  Lunch (talk) 20:33, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  sequence acceleration? 

message: ... the usefulness of this article for practical computations can hardly be underestimated. Dhatfield (talk) 21:35, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incomprehensible article 

message: I suggest a sentence that disambiguates between Richardson Extrapolation and Richardson iteration https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modified_Richardson_iteration
Tashiro (talk) 00:24, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add link to Richardson iteration 

message: Does article does need reviewing and editing by an expert in numerical methods. It is an important topic!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adriaancampo (talk • contribs) 20:07, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article doesn't make sense
Talk:Rubinstein–Taybi syndrome

message: This article was initially categorized based on scheme outlined at WP:DERM:CAT. ---kilbad (talk) 23:35, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article categorization 

message: Hello.  I will be editing this page as an assignment for Advanced Genetics within UWO.  I will be adding additional information to the article, specifically in regards to epigenetics and future treatment research.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zkhan93 (talk • contribs) 17:24, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Advanced Genetics 3595

message: is there any way we can get better pics for this article? the ones here are creepy (my daughter happens to have this and let me tell you, the ones with the kids face edited out is creeeeepy) Stevenwhig (talk) 18:18, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Pictures

message: The intro gives the incidence at birth as 1 in 125,000-300,000, but the figure at the end of the Genetics section gives the upper range as the bottom of this, 1:100,000-125,000. Which is it?
109.155.98.200 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 19:30, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Occurrence
Talk:Schmitt Gillenwater Kelly syndrome

message: — Assignment last updated by FMRIfiend (talk) 02:59, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi all, we are currently working on updating this page, here's what we have so far. Any feedback would be appreciated! FMRIfiend (talk) 06:59, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: BIOL463 Gene Regulation in Development
Talk:Risk management information systems

message: Wikified as part of the Wikification wikiproject! JubalHarshaw 19:34, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

message: There is a Risk Management Information Systems - RMIS page that should be merged with this one. Any takers?
Chi76 18:51, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That articles redirects here, so there is nothing no need to merge. ✤ JonHarder talk 02:11, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Risk Management Information Systems-RMIS
Talk:VACTERL association

message: Wikipedia's external links policy and the specific guidelines for medicine-related articles do not permit the inclusion of external links to non-encyclopedic material, particularly including:  patient support groups, personal experience/survivor stories, internet chat boards, e-mail discussion groups, recruiters for clinical trials, healthcare providers, fundraisers, or similar pages.  
Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not an advertising opportunity or a support group for patients or their families.  Please do not re-insert links that do not conform to the standard rules.  
External links are not required in Wikipedia articles.  They are permitted in limited numbers and in accordance with the policies linked above.  If you want to include one or more external links in this article, please link directly to a webpage that provides detailed, encyclopedic information about the disease. Thanks, WhatamIdoing (talk) 05:10, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: External links

message: 'From January 2003 to January 2013 among 32 infants 15 (46.8%) was diagnosed with VACTERL association.'
something is missing from this sentence in the introduction
Plch (talk) 01:58, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: mistake
Talk:Von Hippel–Lindau disease

message: "This disease could be very poisonous. It gives you side effects like: smelly feet, bad breath, excessive hair growth."
*McCoy's prone to it?
:Stop trolling please. JFW | T@lk 21:53, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Garbage

message: JAMA today re hearing loss in VHL. JFW | T@lk 21:53, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hearing loss

message: The article says the adrenaline releasing tumors can cause rage attacks, but then immediately says they're usually panic attacks.  Which is it?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.230.161.164 (talk) 16:23, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rage or Panic?

message: The Von Hippel-Lindau gene is a tumor supressor, which means the non-functioning protein only appears if both alleles contain this mutation. If I am correct, this means that this mutation will be inherited in an autosomal recessive form, and not in an autosomal dominant form, as now is suggested in this article. Please, correct me if I'm wrong. But if I'm right, perhaps somebody could edit the 'autosomal dominant' image and it's underline, because I have no idea how to do that.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tessal87 (talk • contribs) 23:15, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Another way to think of it would be as a dominate negative mutation. Fuzbaby (talk) 22:21, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

text: The article also states that 90% of individuals show penetrance at age 65. Such incomplete penetrance is not consistant with autosomal dominant per se. Compare to a true autosomal dominant trait where essentially 100% of individuals with the gene show the phenotype. In such cases, the mutated protein is the 'gene product of choice' (if you will) for the cell. Here the OPPOSITE is the case - the non-functional gene is usually expressed when two nonfunctional genes are present or when dysregulated. Such mechanisms do not support the use of the term autosominal dominant. The photo and statement that it is inherited with autosomal dominant pattern should be removed and a more accurate/detailed explanation (ie. sometimes penetrates in single mutated allele but more often requires dysregulation) should be used.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.88.230.47 (talk) 15:16, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  VHL-gene is autosomal recessive? 

message: Under "People", it mentions that a number of McCoy desendants have VHL, and also mentions the Elliotts, but who are they? Jedikaiti (talk) 05:00, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elliotts? 

message: Should it be von like in the body?   Uziel302 (talk) 16:57, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capital v on article title
Talk:Tetrasomy X

message: Should this page be named Tetrasomy X instead of "48, XXXX" since it is more commonly referred to as the former and also, how would you actually pronounce Forty-eight comma space ex ex ex ex? 198.6.46.11 (talk) 20:29, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: :In terms of intelligence, clinical findings suggest that IQ decreases 10 to 15 points per extra X chromosome. Consequently, the average IQ scores of tetrasomy X patients are between 70 and 80.
This has been uncited in the articles for more than two years now. This can be interpreted to argue that women are less intelligent than men. I would just fix that issue except that I'm not confident that any of the rest of this is true. On top of all that, there are only 60 tetrasomy X cases on record and fewer pentasomy X. If someone can come back with a citation, please add this back. Until then, lets leave this out. —mako๛ 04:29, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intelligence 

message: "The majority have also been reported as being longer and taller." Than what? -Uusijani (talk) 15:30, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Longer and taller 

message: I requested that this page be partially protected because of multiple abusive IPs changing the article with nonsense information randomly. Cocoaguy  ここがいい 05:00, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested page protection 

message: A picture of a child who does not have Tetrasomy X but has a cleft lip is the main picture on the tetrasomy X page? What sense does that make? Also, what is the source on the cleft lip? Original research I know, but I've been aware of and following diagnoses of Tetrasomy X for more than a decade and I have never heard of anyone having a cleft lip. Is this vandalism residue? 198.6.33.13 (talk) 20:09, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that the image is misplaced on this article and have removed it. Double sharp (talk) 07:31, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleft lip image reasoning? 

message: article should have 1)treatment section per, 2) also lede could be better--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:08, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Treatment
Talk:Pentasomy X

message: Change to "extremely rare" instead of "rare" wording throughout the introduction to be consistent with the wording of pages pertaining to similar disorders (e.g., "XXXXY") Dmezh (talk) 23:22, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Done -- Waddie96 (talk) 05:30, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 4 April 2018 

message: 119.160.119.105 (talk) 03:56, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. — IVORK Discuss 04:19, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 26 June 2018 

message: 106.192.191.130 (talk) 08:18, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Hhkohh (talk) 10:19, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 28 June 2018 

message: 2001:44C8:42CA:693D:1:2:352C:7862 (talk) 19:45, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. - Dmezh (talk) 20:02, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 20 August 2018 

message: 103.7.79.189 (talk) 12:55, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Sarahj2107 (talk) 13:12, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: xxxxxxx 83.123.192.6 (talk) 20:59, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

text: xxxxxx 180.222.141.84 (talk) 18:30, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  XXXXX8 

message: Ndbgbfxjf
Vdbghddhdhdkf
Bddvdgfbfbdhhbdgvxdbxg
Xbdndbxbdbxydndhfnfhbf
Xndndhdndhfhfcff 202.181.19.242 (talk) 10:17, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mdhtdm 

message: gh uvhvu 125.62.90.145 (talk) 00:07, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  J uck gc
Talk:Zellweger syndrome

message: Is there a pre-natal test that can identify whether an embryo or fetus has the gene defect that causes this disease? If so, I think that this should be added to this entry. --Spiff666 17:16, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article should probably be moved to Zellweger spectrum as that covers ZS, NALD and IRD which could all be in one article. However I don't know much about medicine so I am going to leave it as is for now. -Ravedave 15:06, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Syndrome v Spectrum 

message: It would be nice to have a section that discusses how Zellweger syndrome is diagnosed. Apparently the disease can be diagnosed biochemically. Firewall62 (talk) 04:25, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diagnosis
Talk:Pinocchio's Daring Journey

message: I added an attraction infobox. Disneyfile 19:36, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox

message: I moved the information about first usage of holography from the (former) Triva section to the lead, since that is something that makes the ride notable. Disneyfile 19:36, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I recieved a message saying "Lampwick's mirror is hologram".  Thanks Shiddyshim.  Is this true?  I don't remember it? And is this the same as the Donkey transformation?  --TimothyJacobson (talk) 11:35, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Just went on the one in Paris today.  It is difinitely not a hologram.  The mirror is painted  on the back of the wood --TimothyJacobson (talk) 19:06, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Holographic Technology & Peppers Ghost

message: Could someone list the names of the vehicles (ie Cleo, Gideon, Figaro etc...)--TimothyJacobson (talk) 08:57, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Ride vehicles

message: There is a scene where you go inside a Cage, which Stromboli is holding open for your vehicle to ride through.  Am I right in thinking there was once a time when the cage door was dropped and you were temporarily trapped inside (and, if so, why was is changed?)--TimothyJacobson (talk) 18:57, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Cage

message: There is a Japanese language release of this page: ピノキオの冒険旅行. I feel that should be added to the language area. MHarrington (talk) 06:04, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Japanese language

message: I re wrote the history section, to make it clear that the comments about it living in the old Fantasyland Theatre referred to Disneyland (California) as it is not clear otherwise --TimothyJacobson (talk) 19:06, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: California

message: The summary of the ride sounds like it was written by a teenager in remedial English. Someone should make that more "professional."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.177.170.50 (talk) 04:50, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Summary
Talk:Charlotte-Rose de Caumont de La Force

message: Her name should be Charlotte-Rose Caumont de La Force, or sometimes Charlotte-Rose de Caumont de La Force (can easily be verified by a Google search--Wikipedia pages and the ones referring to them are the only ones that only have the "de" before Caumont). I know this was translated from wikipedia.fr, but that is wrong as well and I will alert them. --Mwillia9 19:48, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs to be moved, IMO
Talk:Maud, and Other Poems

message: Wikified as part of the Wikification wikiproject! JubalHarshaw 19:51, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikified

message: Maud (poem) is currently a redirect to this page. It may be better served if we take the "Maud" section of this article and move it there instead, while leaving this page as a stub dedicated to the book Maud and other poems. JubalHarshaw 19:56, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Split declined. A split at this point would serve no useful purpose. The article needs to be built up, and when the article has grown quite large and the section on Maud at that point is disproportionately large, that would be the time to consider splitting per WP:Summary style. The priority at the moment is to build the article with material appropriately cited to reliable sources. SilkTork *YES! 10:12, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Split

message: 'The Charge of the Light Brigade' was not banned. It was not regarded as suggestive, nor as a 'disgrace to society'. It did not have anything to say about the government or opposition. Tennyson did not regard the military event, or the poem, as a 'bit of a joke'. Many of the points made here about 'The Charge' are factually incorrect. Correct that the poem was first published in The Examiner in 1854, but it was well received. 
See Christopher Ricks, Tennyson, 2nd edn (Macmillan, 1989) for an accurate account of the poem and its publishing history.Christopher Ricks, Tennyson, 2nd edn (Macmillan, 1989) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.156.198.16 (talk) 22:50, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tennyson, 'The Charge of the Light Brigade'
Talk:Pro Wrestling Torch Newsletter

message: Should there be a separate article for the Torch's website, or can that be put in as a feature of the newsletter? --204.246.229.222 19:52, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

message: Should we maybe mention that Pro Wrestling Torch has an iTunes App? It's basically a mobile version of the website. TJ Spyke 04:57, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: iTunes App