Talk:Orgonite

message: hitler
I added some sources and refrences. Please read the other orgone articles on wikipedia, including the research done by Einstein and Reich, before shoving this article of as "new age".
: The article should make clear that Don Croft's concept of "orgone" and orgonite "device" are derived but quite different from Reich's. For example, Reich's substance-monistic concept of orgone did not allow it to be generated or destructed; it may only be gathered and scattered (with orgone accumulators or cloudbusters), and switched between two states (OR and DOR). Nowhere in Reichian literature one can find mention of crystals or mineral material to cause such a conversion; Contact with Space, Reich latest book, is a wild speculation about the complex ecological processes that cleanse the planet of stagnant DOR pockets, and their disruption by human activities. And I do not think that Reich's "orthodox" continuators such as James DeMeo would be very happy to be associated with Don Croft's sloppy business (see “Email letter to Don Croft from James DeMeo”). My two cents, for the sake of neutrality on an article that should probably not exist… —Meidosemme 00:57, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: ::"Ph.D. Charles R. Kelley described orgone energy as the "subtle, trans-dimensional energy matrix of the universe"." 
Is there any indication that there is a consensus to describe it this way? If not, I will delete this sentence as original research. --DrTorstenHenning 09:15, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anyone else? 

message: How come people can be ignorant enough to follow what other people say (particularly within the majority), without testing it out, and/or observing it with unbiased logic...
A true scientist is ALWAYS balanced between being open-minded and skeptical...
Kasdaye 20:49, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's (at least partly) right. And it is because we are open-minded and sceptical that we have not simply deleted this stuff, but are waiting for scientifically sound proof for the claims in this article. --DrTorstenHenning 08:46, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ignorance, the cardinal sin... 

message: Does someone have an idea what is wrong with mentioning the fact that Orgonite is or appears to be a registered trademark? I have not found the FAQ that according to the dit history should be pertaining to this. --DrTorstenHenning 19:18, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see his The Invention controversy Robert C Prenic 16:50, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trademark (?) 

message: I've removed the tag requesting attention from a chemistry expert. This article doesn't need help from a chemist, it needs help from a pseudoscientist. If anyone disagrees, please discuss here. Bfesser 20:31, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia really needs a template that puts a warning in the top of all pseudoscience articles.  Something like a disclaimer saying that the article contains dubious information that could be harmful if taken seriously... but in better wording.  Just a thought.  -- Bfesser 02:40, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 'Pages needing expert attention from Chemistry experts'

message: I vote we merge this. The page has no importance beyond its relavance to Reich's Orgone energy waffle... Famousdog 13:45, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Orgone energy]] 

message: This is probably still a subject which cannot be justified having a Wikipedia article due to its fringy nature and lack of mainstream reliable sources. However, should more sources surface the situation may change. For now, I have found this: . __meco (talk) 18:45, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mainstream news article 

message: Although it may not be truth or fact, communities and forums of people sharing information about this 'orgonite' based on Reich's theories have circulated the internet. There are hundreds of sites and reports of people making this stuff and 'gifting' it in various areas, as well as local newspaper articles, and that guy being arrested for it. Even if this is pseudoscience, I think the article should make a reference to what 'orgonite' actually is and information about this phenomenon. 79.69.217.110 (talk) 19:20, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article should be remade 

message: There seems to be a Russian(?) band called Orgonite these days. Perhaps disambiguation is needed? Atuomi (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 21:00, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Band called orgonite