Talk:9/11 conspiracy theories

message: The section on insider trading includes the excerpt from the 9/11 Commission Report describing how one firm purchased 95% of the put options on one of the days, but does not mention the detail that this was Alex. Brown, which A. B. Krongard had been a director at. This was mentioned in the press at the time. Example: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/mystery-terror-insider-dealers-9237061.html 216.164.226.176 (talk) 03:57, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: , not in reference given. ◢  Ganbaruby!  (Say hi!) 06:37, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 29 January 2021 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: No consensus. There are differing views as to which title better satisfies WP:COMMONNAME, as well as how to weigh the criteria of consistency and precision. (non-admin closure)  Colin M (talk) 19:49, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: 9/11 conspiracy theories →  – Most other articles in the topic area call it the "September 11 attacks" or just "September 11", not "9/11". The last move request was in 2010, but consensus could have changed since then. Another alternative could be Conspiracy theories about the September 11 attacks. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 22:36, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 31 January 2022 

message: — Assignment last updated by Openskies789 (talk) 00:30, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: English 202A Writing in the Social Sciences

message: "According to an international poll that same year, huge majorities in Muslim countries prefer to believe baseless conspiracy theories rather than listen to the mainstream facts of what happened on September 11, 2001, in New York City and Washington. "
in any case I think this is a very un-wikipedia-like sentence, even if it is true (which seems unlikely to me). why not:
According to an international poll that same year, a majority of the population of some Muslim countries believe in some form of 9/11 conspiracy theory.
or something similar 2601:249:8A80:2550:889D:99AE:2575:5D08 (talk) 22:50, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: That does sound better. Dronebogus (talk) 01:59, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  citation needed for this? 

message: There needs to be the underground nuclear demolition section added to the conspiracy theory section, there is wide and thorough research into this category by nuclear physicists and demolition experts.
Please include it. 2601:280:C781:B7F0:BCCB:D650:2632:1ED1 (talk) 06:51, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Provide reliable sources documenting these claims first. — The Hand That Feeds You:Bite 13:03, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nuclear demolition 

message: I find it odd that in this article the person has listed this as conspiracy theory..According to the fact the beginning of this pipeline started in 2015. 2604:2D80:DA10:4B00:3D63:1DD8:E70:7997 (talk) 22:51, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The conspiracy theory is that the attacks in the USA were staged in order to justify a war, just so a gas pipeline could be built in Afghanistan & profit US companies. It's not surprising that corporations decided to capitalize on the situation & build a pipeline once the US military invaded, but it remains a conspiracy theory that the attacks were part of a plan just to get that pipeline built. — The Hand That Feeds You:Bite 22:55, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gas pipeline through Afghanistan as conspiracy. 

message: Re: accusations of the attacks being staged by the home govt. for their own popularity benefit
OF COURSE the accusations on the latter (moscow) one were FAR more accurate and less of a 'conspiracy theory' (said so so that I don't get banned on 'suspicion of promoting' wild conspiracy theories)
 
but still..i don't think it would do harm for wikipedia to include this bit 2402:E280:3D1D:5B0:F8E5:CCBD:7266:964B (talk) 10:19, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: and if it is apparently WP:OR (which I doubt), then what/why does the statement "encyclopedia compiling ALL human knowledge" should/shall mean 2402:E280:3D1D:5B0:F8E5:CCBD:7266:964B (talk) 10:23, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

text: Reliable sources discussing such a comparison need to exist before we can have anything to say on the matter. Girth Summit (blether) 12:20, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interesting comparison with moscow apartment bombings 

message: change " a researcher from the French National Centre for Scientific Research published in Le Monde." to  "a researcher from the French National Centre for Scientific Research published in the newspaper Le Monde.". It makes it clear that Le Monde is not a scientific journal, which I personaly thought reading it. MartinUnknown (talk) 18:21, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: --TheImaCow (talk) 13:01, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 2 March 2024