lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Muppet Movie

message: Removed the criticism section for being very one sided, almost as an ad for Truth.com.  It shows almost a complete opposite of the article at Truth.com and needs to be rewritten. Bnszero 06:11, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Here is the edit. I agree it could be better written. And rather than referencing the truth.com website it should reference the State of Minnesota v. Philip Morris, et al. trial documentation or an archived AAP newsfeed but it may be noteworthy. The fact that cigars appeared in Muppet movie may not have been as a result of product placement, but it was shown that tobacco products unknown were provided free for this use.--Timtak (talk) 00:41, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

text: Nope. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 10:27, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Criticism

message: The first line in the production section strikes me as odd:
"The first time a Muppet project is NOT set in Muppetland, instead the plot is based on the real world."
The bolded capitalisation aside, exactly how do we define "Muppetland" and how is it distinct from the "real world" as fictionalised in this film? I've looked on the Muppet Wiki and they don't appear to define the concept there.
My first thought was to remove the line, but I thought I'd ask first, as it's been in the article for nearly a year, apparently unchallenged. --Dominic Hardstaff (talk) 19:53, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Muppetland

message: Re-worked entire plot summary in response to copy edit tag.  I feel this satisfies the tag and have removed it.  If anybody has any suggestions or feels the tag should be reapplied, I would appreciate your comments.  Thanks.Geno the Great (talk) 06:03, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot Summary

message: also cameos (silently) as woman with balloon 2A01:CB0C:CD:D800:8D7F:3103:B631:7F02 (talk) 16:18, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Melinda Dillon
Talk:The Browning Version (play)

message: I suggest the article remains for the play only and we start separate articles on the 2 notable films. Therefore I remove the film tags and the film categories and start a dab page The Browning Version (disambiguation). Hoverfish Talk 18:47, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ...and by creating it, it turns out the 1951 film had an article already!! Hoverfish Talk 19:15, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

message: Why doesn't the article mention the name of the playwright? I realize that one can get this information in the Categories section, but it seems like a major error that the reader is required to scroll down to the end of the article. Many less savvy readers might not even think to do that. --Peter Knutsen (talk) 17:13, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops, nevermind. I somehow managed to overlook the fact that the playwright's name is mentioned, in the very first sentence in the article. Very sorry, and I should probably go get some sleep. Carry on, everybody... --Peter Knutsen (talk) 17:14, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Who wrote this play?
Talk:Gate of Flesh

message: U.S. release date is listed here as December 11th, 1964. Does anyone have an official citation for this, or know more details about its initial U.S. release? The only other source that I've found with this date is IMDB, which is not 100% reliable and also does not list an external source. I've checked Tom Vick's and Tony Rayns' books, and neither one lists a U.S. release date for the film or any details about it.
My impression was that Suzuki wasn't distributed in the U.S. until much later, starting with his art house films in the 1980s and later with film festival retrospectives of his Nikkatsu work. That said, Gate of Flesh was his most popular Nikkatsu film, so I guess if any of them would have been screened in the U.S. it would have been that one. If that U.S. release date is true, it might be nice to include more detail about it (i.e., who distributed it, where did it screen), since there doesn't seem to be much information about that.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 136.56.51.110 (talk) 17:03, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation for U.S. Release Date
Talk:An Angel at My Table

message: It reads quite strangely that the article describes it as a New Zealand film and then the "Cinema of Australia" template is included at the bottom.
If NZ and Australian films are to be categorised together, then the template might be better named "Cinema of Australasia" or "Cinema of Oceania".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.186.9.5 (talk) 01:41, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is not an Australian film 
Talk:Harakiri (1962 film)

message: When Hanshiro is asked if he knows Motome he does not actively deny knowing him. He clearly dissembles as we discover later; but his answer is more like "There were 12,000 retainers, one couldn't know them all." He allows Saito to conclude he didn't know Motome but he does not disavow him. I think that to actively lie would violate the code Hanshiro has developed to replace the code of bushido which has led him to this place.
Dan McMahon  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.195.228.142 (talk) 20:32, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  small suggestion
Talk:Insignificance (film)

message: Please help expand the Production section with well-sourced information about shooting, editing, etc. I'll be back to do some more when I'm not so tired!--TEHodson 05:25, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Production section 
Talk:Oklahoma School of Science and Mathematics

message: Hello all, and thank you for contributing to this school site. I'm part of the Wikipedia:WikiProject_Schools/Assessment team, and, as it recently requested a review, then I'm reviewing this page. I'm currently giving it a grade of start on the Wikipedia 1.0 Assessment Scale and an importance of Low on this importance scale.
My reasoning is as follows: Well its a good start length. Importance mid as the school appears to be well sought after, Appears to be three refs but actually they are all to the same freindly web site. Some pics? Suggestion. You were recently included in a Newsweek review ... quote it. Newsweek. Hope this helps  Victuallers 22:22, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  March 2007 

message: Thanks to whoever corrected that for me. Lightning Jim 00:33, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pryor/Kansas Confusion 

message: First of all, 100% of OSSM students are not college bound. In fact, from my two years at the school, I know of a handful of students that have been demoralised and have given up higher education all-together. This includes one student who was kicked out for accumulation of minor infractions, only to live out of a car. OSSM is an opportunity for some, but a challenge for those who wish to be treated like a human being. If considering the school, find a way to talk to past and present students. Ask about class retention. Were 25% of students kicked out last year? Ask why.  Ask about the massive number of expulsions from the class of 2004, as well.
: I graduated in the class of 1992.  Yes, it was academically, emotionally, and physically rigorous.  (I could tell all sorts of great stories about how my friends inspired new behavioral rules.)  Many left for one reason or another.  But we were the first class.  There was much to learn on all sides, and I'm sure they're still learning.  I'm glad I stayed through it all. Bouncey (talk) 15:24, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible Scandals/Dirt Section? 

message: I removed the purported link to the Lawton regional center site after following it to find a site with no information whatsoever about OSSM or its regional centers.  If this changes in the future, it could certainly be re-added; for now, though, that link seems to have nothing to do with OSSM and, thus, doesn't belong here. Ashdog137 22:39, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lawton RC link 

message: While I was making the previous changed, I rephrased the attrition section to avoid the unsourced 7-10% attrition statement.  If anyone can provide verifiable evidence of the actual rate that could be linked to, then we could add it back in; as is, it seems to be either outright conjecture or original research, neither of which would be appropriate here. Ashdog137 22:46, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attrition rates
Talk:Eureka (1983 film)

message: 1984 is only in IMDb. Most other archives state as dates 1981, 82, 83, sometimes attributing one year in the listing and then stating another year in section of the film: , . However, the majority of Nicolas Roeg filmographies give 1983 for Eureka. Hoverfish 08:21, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Release Year
Talk:The Man Who Fell to Earth (novel)

message: The current version of the article says that Betty Jo "ages from her twenties to her fifties during the narrative". That's a bit unclear as the novel takes place over a five-year period so how did she age three decades? Needs elaboration. --Mathew5000 22:49, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  aging of Betty Jo? 

message: Although the book was written in 1963, there's a reference to the Watergate scandal near the end (on p. 180 in the Del Rey edition published 1999). Obviously this reference was inserted sometime between 1973 and 1999, but when exactly? And what other revisions were made from Tevis's 1963 edition? I found this quite jarring while reading the book. I tried to find information about this from Google but hit a couple of dead ends: a query on Amazon.de that was never answered and a televised panel discussion which mentions the issue and seems to refer to a comparison of a new edition with an original edition "on the web site" but I could not locate that. In particular I would like to know whether Tevis authorized the changes. --Mathew5000 22:55, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Different editions of the book / revisions made by Tevis 

message: The 1997 Australian film 'Epsilon' (Alien Visitor in the U.S.) has many parallels with TMWFTE including a sole, naked traveler visiting earth to assist with its impending doom. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0112974/?ref_=tt_urv
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epsilon_(film) Dan Bollinger (talk) 15:26, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another version
Talk:Hatten är din

message: Er, the "allegedly popular Swedish drinking game involving the passing around of hats" was just a continuation of the joke made up from the bizarre content of the "Swedish" lyrics. If any of my fellow Swedes have actually played it before the meme, I'll eat my hat :) Amphis 19:34, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: This custom does not exist...

message: WHat is the point of having a link to a 404 site?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.236.226.169 (talk) 20:58, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link 

message: That image changes, what happened to the original one? 150.250.177.231 (talk) 03:44, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 
Talk:Kill!

message: I love this film and would very much like to improve this page. Is there anyone else watching this article? If so, do you have any leads for improvements? Any information at all? CHdeJongh (talk) 15:36, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: , I've added some information on the films release and an award it won in Japan. I have not seen it yet though. Could its plot be expanded in any way since you are a fan? Andrzejbanas (talk) 00:18, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Help?
Talk:Zazie dans le Métro (novel)

message: This article says "D'où qu'il pue donc tant?", while the Raymond_Queneau article says "D'où qu'ils puent donc tant?" AnonMoos (talk) 03:01, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Plural or singular?

message: It is said by some critics that the 1st. word might have something to do with this 
Something is rotten in the state of Denmark.
Marcellus, scene iv
Please notice I'm taking it from the Wikiquote []--207.249.136.254 (talk) 15:13, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  First word Hamlet 

message: In french this is simply a contraction of "Where does this stench come from ?". Zazie, a young country girl, asks it on entering the sub. Best wishes from France. Arapaima (talk) 08:50, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "''Doukipudonktan ?''"
Talk:Secret Agent (1936 film)

message: Is it Ashinden or Ashenden?  His passport clearly says "Ashinden"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.152.3.7 (talk) 07:51, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  I vs E 

message: I've removed that claim that Hitchcock makes a cameo appearance in the film ("he can be seen coming down the ship's gangway in front of Ashenden, at about 8 minutes into the film") as it clearly isn't Hitchcock.  The following are screen grabs from the best DVD release available. Davepattern 16:36, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hitchcock cameo 

message: "Typical Hitchcockian themes used here include mistaken identity and murder." Mistaken identity, yes. Murder? Isn't that a bit generic? That's rather like saying that "murder" is a "typical theme" of Perry Mason novels. WilliamSommerwerck (talk) 20:08, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: "Murder" is a theme?
Talk:Barbara Cartland bibliography

message: This list should be expanded to a full table of data, using articles like List of Oz books and other members of :Category:Bibliographies by author as a guide. --Quiddity 22:44, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion
Talk:The Loneliness of the Long-Distance Runner

message: Why isn't there a hyphen in "Long-Distance"?  That's how it appears on the book cover pictured. Iglew (talk) 08:51, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Hyphen in Title

message: Do think this is valid?  I find it appropriate, particularly when observing this passage: "I'd rather be like I am...than have the whip-hand over somebody else and be dead from the toe nails up.  Maybe as soon as you get the whip-hand over somebody you do go dead.  By God, to say that last sentence has needed a few hundred miles of long-distance running," (pg. 14, Alfred A. Knopf 5th edition 1970).  There are another couple passages that provide good evidence, shout out if anyone has a problem with it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Latvahat (talk • contribs) 00:12, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Analysis Section

message: The Loneliness of the Long Distance Runner, "The Loneliness of the Long Distance Runner (song)", and The Loneliness of the Long Distance Runner (film)? Her Pegship 04:53, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The current article looks like a collection of stubs, but IMHO it's still better than three stubs. I'm against the proposed split. --Kjoonlee 16:57, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Definitely for the split... the page reads like a disambiguation page with too much information as it is. -DMurphy 02:51, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

text: Against the split for now, but if the sections on the film and the story grow considerably in the future than perhaps split it into two articles with the music section put into the story's article.Soltake (talk) 01:12, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split into... 

message: "Long Distance Runner" means anyone who runs long distances. This phrase alone does not relate to the story. If the two songs mentioned with this title are indeed adaptations of the story, we need some kind of reference to establish that. I am removing them until such is provided. 77.49.210.200 (talk) 00:16, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Musical Adaptations section 

message: The historical context section mostly reads like a gender studies essay on post-war England, and seems to have been this way for quite some time now. Would be great if someone could find the time to drastically shorten or re-write it. Haltendehand (talk) 20:48, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm going to tackle this, though realistically the section is pretty much unsalvageable in both content and writing quality and I'll likely just wind up axing it entirely.  My god it is terrible. Palindromedairy (talk) 01:58, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical Context
Talk:Shampoo (film)

message: the statement about the films success seems pretty weird. Rocky Horror Picture Show found success only after years of midnight showings, and "Shampoo" must have done better in original, general release. RHPS didn't turn a real profit for a few years, whereas "Shampoo" was rather successful in general release
--judexdot1-- 75.72.234.176 14:24, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This is true. 'RHPS' was a non-entity of a film until many years after its release--which I am surprised to discover was this early.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:346:580:1FD0:7872:22CA:8C1:6337 (talk) 15:44, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  beaten by Rocky Horror? 

message: -- In 11 July 2009 20th Century Fox, Universal Pictures, Studio Canal and Working Title Films announced that the movie will be the remake of the 1975 classic. --
 
The above sentence is unintelligible and unsourced.  I have moved if from the article to here until someone translates it from gibberish to English and sources it.  -- Davidkevin (talk) 13:15, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remake 

message: As noted in the article, Jefferson Airplane's studio version of the traditional folk song "Good Shepherd" plays on the soundtrack. It is heard during the party scene. The song was included on the band's album "Volunteers," originally release in early November 1969, while the party takes place on the night of the U.S. presidential election of Nov. 5, 1968 (the entire movie takes place in the 36 hours surrounding that election day).Maccb (talk) 22:26, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Musical anachronism.
Talk:Burn!

message: Like one of the links, "Ecology of Destruction" show, the original script refered to a spanish colony in the Caribean. This was changed to a portuguese colony allegedely not to offend the spanish audiences. The film shows many stereotypes about portuguese and spanish being more or less the same. Except for the title, that is really portuguese, most carachters have spanish names and not portuguese. That´s why the film is often criticized for his stereotypes about portuguese and spanish as being relatively the same. It´s odd to see an anti-colonialist film showing so much ethnic and language stereotipes. The only portuguese name in the film is "Queimada", the rest is all spanish. User:Mistico14:00, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Criticism

message: The article says in two sections that the William Walker in the movie is based on the American pro-slavery military adventurer. I've tagged these statements as original research, and they should be removed unless reliable sources are added in a reasonable time to WP:Verify the claims. There have been millions of "William Walker"s including dozens with Wikipedia articles. Yes, they were both military adventurers, but the "filibuster" Walker was an American from Tennessee, and the one in the movie is "Sir" William Walker, British. The countries involved are different and there are few similarities. Edison (talk) 16:17, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Original research
Talk:King of Hearts (1966 film)

message: I have remarks about the 1st paragraph and the plot.1. Since the  plot is so short, why write plot details on the 1st paragraph? "King of Hearts (original French title: Le Roi de Cœur) is a 1966 French film set in a small town in France near the end of World War I" would be enough.2. "Directed by Philippe de Broca" belongs to the 1st paragraph and not to the plot.What do you think? Thanks Kvsh5 (talk) 08:48, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The plot section might be integrated into the lead section (there is some duplication), but I do not support reducing it to a single short sentence... AnonMoos (talk) 15:30, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot 

message: Does anyone know who controls the film and television rights? 172.116.189.10 (talk) 19:59, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does anyone know who controls the film and television rights?
Talk:The Big Chill (film)

message: Hope someone can upload a larger image of a TBC movie poster or lobby card.  The one currently being used is so small it's little more than decoration.  50.54.236.164 (talk) 14:07, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Larger image

message: Wasn't the soundtrack particularly influential on popular culture at the time?
This soundtrack was reflective of popular culture at the time of the movie, as well as 10-15 years earlier when those songs were first heard. Jrgilb (talk) 01:21, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Soundtrack

message: There are many inaccuracies. Sadsaque (talk) 05:46, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot 

message: This is the typical 5th grade book report approach to a synopsis.
"They go into the kitchen and find Richard making a sandwich, and the three have a discussion about responsibility and adulthood. Richard states, "Nobody said it was going to be fun. At least, nobody said it to me.""
Incidental settings and staging decisions and random plot snippets do not equate to the gist or the motivation of a story. If you mean to be writing a synopsis and this is what you get then you have not grasped the film nor how to write. I don't mean to be mean, but this sort of thing is all over Wikipedia. Please think about what you're doing. APDEF (talk) 15:15, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I did a major overhaul of the plot summary. Hopefully it's improved.PNW Raven (talk) 12:35, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please
Talk:Here Comes Mr. Jordan

message: Nazasmp (talk) 18:37, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Here Comes Mr. Jordan = Translation 

message: The one Joe is flying in level flight, and the one that dives, are not the same. Tail is different. 2001:56A:FA85:3800:91BD:30DD:E8C9:6DF6 (talk) 03:49, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Aircraft
Talk:Arsenic and Old Lace (film)

message: The final sentence of the first paragraph: "If not for the stage play, Karloff would have played the same role in the film." seems obscure. It isn't clear how the stage play prevented Karloff from appearing in the film.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Toddmg (talk • contribs) 14:03, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Usually being in such a successful Broadway play is so time-consuming that there really isn't time to do much else (including a film adaptation of the very play you're in.)  —  Cinemaniac (talk) 23:18, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Karloff 

message: Is it worth adding a section on how the movie differs from the script of the play?75.69.129.180 (talk) 01:54, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Compare/Contrast with actual play? 

message: I believe A&OL is one, if not THE one, most reprised theater script ever.  Opinions? Published data? 70.124.60.80 (talk) 14:22, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: i thought it was 'Our Town'.. a disney-esque, somnambulistic look at America. 2602:304:CDAF:A3D0:742F:87B:25D4:36C (talk) 16:06, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  success as a high school / amateur production 

message: * Historic reviews, photo gallery at CaryGrant.net
* "Arsenic and Old Lace" at Peter Lorre Companion Online
* Arsenic and Old Lace on Screen Guild Theater: November 25, 1946 
Moved from the external links section as possible sources. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 13:52, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 
Talk:Carnal Knowledge (film)

message: I don't see why this is a redirect from Carnal Knowledge.  According to WP:NAME it should be as general as possible, and in this case the title is unique. Any objections? Ardent†∈ 14:59, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. Now the title reflects standard format for films, and in this case it's even more pressing to do so because there is an article with the exact same title, save one capital letter, which is a recipe for disaster/confusion: Carnal knowledge. -- Filmfluff (talk) 18:08, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title change 
Talk:The Fisher King

message: Not only they're credited as such in the film, but Gilliam calls them so in 2014 interview: https://slate.com/culture/2014/08/terry-gilliam-remembers-directing-robin-williams-in-the-fisher-king.html (the article is about the production and can be used in the article). 5.173.57.88 (talk) 09:05, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The 2 "thugs" of the film are specifically punks