lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:South Deering, Chicago

message: "It is a very industrial neighborhood"-article
Is there really any industry left? Wisconsin Steel closed in 1980!!!Falange (talk) 02:51, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Industrial ?

message: The 1953 placement of blacks in this CHA low-rise housing project(Trumbull Park Homes) caused the local whites to initiate many months of riots and low-intensity guerrilla warfare.
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,819485,00.html
http://www.encyclopedia.chicagohistory.org/pages/2461.html
http://www.neiu.edu/~reseller%20/sdtrmblpkriots.html
http://www.thenation.com/archive/detail/13351672
http://wwwsoc.nii.ac.jp/jaas/periodicals/JJAS/PDF/1999/No.10-015.pdf
http://www.neiu.edu/~reseller/sdtrmblcha.html
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3945/is_200101/ai_n8931811/pg_6?tag=artBody;col1
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,860709,00.html
http://www.jstor.org/pss/2082185
http://www.amazon.com/phrase/Trumbull-Park
http://books.google.com/books?id=Whm1kn8YqvAC&pg=PA166&lpg=PA166&dq=Trumbull+Park+Homes+%2Briots&source=web&ots=v5p-ZAigHe&sig=qqbPziPVQZvDVRiE9In71uAOhaE&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=9&ct=result  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.10.4.227 (talk) 23:45, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Trumbull Park Riots in South Deering
Talk:457 plan

message: Should there be a statement that no Roth version of the 457 plan exists?  (I think this is true.) 71.122.142.53 (talk) 02:55, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Nice catch. I added that because it is true. It's a little hard to add a citation for that type of fact, because IRS sources don't say it isn't allowed for 457 plans speicifically, they just define Designated Roth accounts as being for 401(k) and 403(b) plans. - Taxman Talk 02:40, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe this should be clarified.  It currently says "Another difference is that 457 plan participant cannot make designated Roth contributions as participants in appropriately ammended 401(k) and 403(b) plans can."  But this makes it sound like a participant in a 457 is not allowed to contribute to a Roth IRA or a Roth 401(k), which is incorrect.  It might be better to say something along the lines of "There is no Roth version of a 457" to avoid confusion.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.178.9.166 (talk) 15:02, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: No Roth version, right?

message: Does a 457(b) plan have the same required distributions at age 70.5?  If so, it might be good if the article showed that.  In addition, if there is no penalty for early withdrawals (i.e., before age 59.5), does this also mean that there is no penalty if someone does not start taking disbursements until they are much older than 70.5 (e.g., in their 80s)?  Tesseract501 (talk) 17:01, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Minimum Required Distributions

message: Why is this plan called non-qualified even though the contributions are made with pre-tax dollars?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.183.2.240 (talk) 11:51, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Not entirely sure, but according to the IRS (Non-Governmental 457(b) Deferred Compensation Plans), they are non-qualified.  A small number of places call it qualified, but list no source.  Again, I cannot find a reason why. --Putrid76 01:40, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-qualified
Talk:Fasting and abstinence of the Coptic Orthodox Church

message: I just performed a general revision of the article based on the liturgical books I owe. The information I was uncertain about was kept as is until I find sources that either back or refute it.
Some of the changes I made include:
* Removing the reference to the Coptic Calendar as Julian Calendar. This is irrelevent to the topic. If people are interested in knowing what the Coptic Calendar is, they can simply click on it and read about it on the appropriate page.
* Removing reference to the mainstream Orthodox Churches! I am sorry but who is to say what is mainstream and what is not? I also removed reference to cooking with wine in other church traditions. We are talking about the Coptic tradition here, and if people are interested in knowing about fasting in the other churches they can do so on the appropriate page.
* The week following Coptic Christmas is NOT fast-free. Wednesdays and Fridays are still observed as fasting days.
* Fasting in expectation of partaking of the Holy Communion does not necessarily begin at midnight. Nine hours before the partaking is the rule that is followed in church today.
Otherwise, I made small changes to grammar/spelling, and removed redundant information.
I apologize if my tone sounds a little aggressive. I must stress the fact that I completely appreciate and respect the effort that all the other users have put into this article, particularly Orthopraxia and Ghaly. Let's just keep it Coptic Orthodox as opposed to Orthodox in general.
Thanks. --130.189.15.61 21:42, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  General cleanup and reorganization of the article
Talk:Ember days

message: Is there any connection to the Quarter Days?  Rojomoke (talk) 13:50, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No. Though based in the religious calendar the Quarter Days are civil observances ant the Ember Days are periods of religious fast and abstinence.  Nick Breakspeare (talk) 03:34, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quarter Days 

message: There seems to be a tone of hostility to the subject in this article. Lines like:
* The correspondence is forced.
* frank indifference to quantity and meter
* equally clumsy old English rhyme
don't seem encyclopedic to me. I'm going to try to tone down the rhetoric. Rwflammang (talk) 17:09, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hostility 

message: I suggest merging Quarter tense into Ember days. The article on "Quarter tense" says that it's the Irish name for ember days, and there's minimal content there.  — Moriwen (talk) 00:35, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: A complication is Quarter Days, with slightly more than minimal content. Sparafucil (talk) 20:16, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: AFAICT the two are unrelated if similarly named? But I could easily be missing something.— Moriwen (talk) 20:32, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

text: Quarter tense end Ember Days are the same thing. The former term is of Latin origin and the latter term is of Old English or possibly Welsh origin. They should not be confused with the Quarter Days, which, though based in the religious calendar, are civil observances. The Ember Days are periods of religious fast and abstinence to beg God's blessing and give thanks for the various harvests. Nick Breakspeare (talk) 03:42, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

text: Klbrain (talk) 13:23, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Sopwith Salamander

message: There's also a computer game called Sopwith.
Can anyone (should anyone?) link to the game article from this article the wikipedia way?
: There are several other Sopwith aircraft (especially the Sopwith Camel?) much more likely to have a link with a computer game called "Sopwith". Have a look. Soundofmusicals (talk) 12:01, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sopwith computer game
Talk:Capital asset

message: I came to this page because it had a request for citations. I didn't start out to rewrite it, just to add internal Wiki links and references.
There were four sections in the old article. Financial economics was a stub. Tax was wrong, at least for the United States and any other jurisdiction I know of. The managerial accounting section was an opinion piece, and not directly relevant to the topic. The financial accounting might have been saved if I relabeled in governmental accounting, but at that point I decided to start from scratch. I offer apologies to all the people who worked on this, but I don't think the result was worth saving.
I don't consider this finished, I've just laid out the basic definitions and some important distinctions. There is a lot more to be said about capital assets, but now you can start from a firm base, with authoritative references.
AaCBrown (talk) 00:52, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations

message: I have added some material from the Federal government on the definition of Captial assets that is common to a broad range of civil infrastructure. Cheers Risk Engineer (talk) 14:04, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Engineering applications
Talk:Golf Street railway station

message: Station ? This is a glorified bus shelter on the trackside. As a name, Golf Street Halt is far more appropriate. -- Derek Ross | Talk 05:44, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have removed the Dundee and Arbroath historic railways details, as the station did not exist in the Dundee and Arbroath days (or indeed before the creation of British Railways). Dunarc (talk) 21:06, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historic railways
Talk:Barry Links railway station

message: I have added the  template to the second paragraph of the current operations. In my view it is not supporting a NPOV - statements such as:
::*provided so as to avoid the difficulty of formal closure procedures
::*not timed conveniently for passengers wishing to commute to Dundee
..are made without supporting references, and could be argued that they demonstrate original research. --Stewart (talk | edits) 19:48, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current operations POV 

message: I have changed the next station in Dundee and Arbroath to Carnoustie. Golf Street did not exist in the Dundee and Arbroath days Dunarc (talk) 18:44, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historic railways
Talk:Monifieth railway station

message: I have changed previous Dundee and Arbroath station in the historic railways box from Balmossie to Broughty Ferry, as Balmossie did not exist pre-nationalisation or pre-grouping.
Dunarc (talk) 11:07, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historic Railways 
Talk:Balmossie railway station

message: Although the station serves Barnhill and the east end of Broughty Ferry it a) also serves the west end of Monifieth and b)is actually just in Monifieth and thus the County of Angus, not Dundee - the current boundary between Dundee and Angus runs through the footbridge to the west of the station platforms
Dunarc (talk) 23:01, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: True, the boundary runs along the south-western side of South Balmossie Street and continues along the south-western side of the footbridge and then runs in a straight line out into the Firth, thus the station is on the Monifieth side of the boundary, so . --Redrose64 (talk) 10:09, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location
Talk:The Power Broker

message: There are evidently a number of different editions this biography with differing page numbers.  The NY Times 1981 Moses obituary gives it as 1246 pages.  The current Amazon editions list the hardcover at 1336 pages and the paperback at 1344 pages.  So for accuracy, comments on page number should list which edition is being used. --Blainster 17:19, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Page references

message: Coming up next year, in 2024 czar 14:57, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  50th anniversary
Talk:History of the petroleum industry in Canada (natural gas liquids)

message: I wrote this article, and I own the copyright. I am voluntarily contributing a chapter of one of my books to Wikipedia. Please do not remove this article.20:50, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Please be advised that copyright for wikipedia articles will be licences under GNU General Public License, as specified in every page footer, see WP:GFDL. You will have to (pretty much) give up the ownership of the copyright once you contribute to wikipedia. I guess you already know this, just wanted to be clear. Cheers, and thanks for the contributions. --Qyd 19:11, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright

message: I have assessed this as B-Class due to its depth and organization, although it really needs in-line citations, and of low importance as it is a highly specific topic with Canada. Cheers, CP 23:25, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:IRS penalties

message: I've begun a clean up. The title of the article, "IRS penalties," is something of a misnomer. Referring to penalties imposed under the Internal Revenue Code as "IRS penalties" is rather like referring to a traffic fine imposed for operating a motor vehicle in excess of the speed limit as being a "police department penalty." The police department itself does not impose the penalty. The IRS is simply the government agency that is charged with most (but not all) of the enforcement of the U.S. federal tax laws.
Civil tax penalties (monetary penalties) are imposed by law (by statutes enacted by Congress), not by the IRS. Criminal penalties are imposed by law, not by the IRS.
In the criminal arena, the IRS only investigates federal tax crimes and makes recommendations as to whether an individual should be prosecuted. The decision to prosecute is made only by the Tax Division of the Department of Justice. Indictment is made only by a federal grand jury, not by the IRS. A criminal penalty for violating the Internal Revenue Code is imposed NOT by the IRS, but rather by a federal district judge in a judgment of conviction pursuant to a law passed by Congress, and under the federal sentencing guidelines -- after a trial with a guilty verdict or after a plea of guilty. (The federal prisons are run by the Federal Bureau of Prisons, which is part of the Department of Justice. Strictly speaking, that is the only role of the Department of Justice in actually meting out "punishment," if you will.) I have therefore removed most of the repetitive, misleading references in the article to federal criminal penalties. Famspear (talk) 14:54, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Begin clean up
Talk:Gauss's lemma (polynomials)

message: Shouldn't this be Gauss' lemma and not Gauss's lemma?
: Google's top hits vote for "Gauss's". And I've usually heard it pronounced "gowses lemma" (not "gowse lemma"), if we follow that rule for the possessive s. iames 20:01, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title 

message: In the section "Proof of the lemma" where step 3 asserts the existence of a,b such that ag and bh are primitive, I believe that more justification is required. I'm working through this proof for the case R = Z and F = Q (in the notation of the article) and I can't find any good reason why a,b must be in R. It does follow that ab is a unit in R, which allows us to conclude that ag and bh multiply to f (up to units). In either case, I think the proof presented in this section needs some touching up.
:a is a least common multiple of the denominators of the coefficients of g (when the coefficients are expressed in lowest terms). Algebraist 21:42, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right. I've fixed the proof. Algebraist 18:38, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Section: "Proof of the lemma"

message: In the first proof of the primitivity I believe the sum for the highest degree monomial of the product contains only one term making the rest of the argument nonsense. A correct proof can be found here:  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.149.14.72 (talk • contribs) 13:25, 4 March 2015‎
:It seems that you have not read the sentence until its end. The proof is correct. However, for clarification, I have edited the sentence by permuting some words. D.Lazard (talk) 15:56, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Proof of the lemma (again)
Talk:Adjusted gross income

message: Seems these two stubs could be merged.  MAGI could be a section in this article. Morphh  (talk) 3:17, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Dear editors: I agree; the article on Modified Adjusted Gross Income could be merged into the article on Adjusted Gross Income. Yours, Famspear 04:04, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Seems valid. Is AGI the "dominant" term? --Winklethorpe 21:38, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Done Morphh  (talk) 13:05, 03 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge [[Modified Adjusted Gross Income]] into this article

message: I had everything lost through a robbery...have no physical evidence of my tax status...please contact me on how to rectify this ....Thank you 
Paula M. Rabitor  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.120.147.188 (talk) 20:57, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  lost previous tax info 

message: I'd like to offer the suggestion.  The following opening sentence,
:For United States individual income tax, taxable income is adjusted gross income (AGI) less allowances for personal exemptions and itemized deductions.
would appear to be a lot clearer if it were reworded.
:For United States individual income tax, taxable income less allowances for personal exemptions and itemized deductions is adjusted gross income (AGI).
As its the opening sentence, I'd like a reviewer to see if they agree first.
Thanks  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.231.167.244 (talk) 04:14, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: That might seem clearer, but it is incorrect.  The article as worded is correct, and seems clear.  The definition of AGI is in the second sentence.  The first sentence puts it in context. Oldtaxguy (talk) 17:13, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  unclear language 

message: For a majority of employed people, there will be a common set of specific above-the-line deductions: health care insurance costs, 401(k) payments, etc. It could be worth giving an overview of the common adjustments so that people know that these are taken off their gross income as part of calculating AGI. 50.250.13.33 (talk) 00:16, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Examples of deductions for most people?
Talk:KPCW

message: So I'm really quite confused by the whole fair use policy.  I'd like to grab KPCW's logo off the kpcw.org webpage and add it here.  It would seem to be fair use since it would be used to identify the station that it belongs to but the fair use policy confuses the heck out of me so I'm avoiding doing so for now.
Hansonc 20:55, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Practically every radio station article incorporates a logo, and the image pages almost always claim fair use. I've never heard of an admin dumping one, so be bold and do it. See :Image:NewWJJZLogo.gif for an example. Rpresser 22:21, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done and Done Hansonc 21:23, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo and Fair Use
Talk:John O. Agwunobi

message: The Commissioned Corps of the U.S. Public Health Service(USPHS) is the second smallest of the seven Uniformed Services of the United States (Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, USPHS Commissioned Corps, and Commissioned Corps of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Acministration (NOAA). All seven uniformed services have the same rank/pay structure, hence Dr. Agwunobi is a "four star" admiral, has the same rank and pay as other four-star flag officers (e.g. the Chief of Naval Operations, Chief of Staff of the Army, etc). We don't take a good ole boy/gal without uniformed service experience and make them an instant admiral in the Navy or general in the Army, Marine Corps, or Air Force. They're promoted to those ranks from within! Why isn't the Surgeon General of the USPHS (a vice-admiral) selected from among the serving USPHS officers? The law requires that when a USPHS officer is appointed the Assistant Secretary for Health (ASH), he holds "four-star" rank. Why wasn't Dr. Agwunobi simply appointed as ASH in a civilian (non-uniformed) capacity, instead of being commissioned an "instant admiral?"
204.111.101.44 20:55, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The
Talk:Miners Flag

message: The source for this article is http://www.communitylaw.org.au/loddoncampaspe/a8_publish/modules/publish/content.asp?id=19293&navgrp=1068 I am not convinced it is authorative and am reluctant to use material from the page as it in turn does not cite its sources.  The flag is not mentioned in Blainey's The Rush That Never Ended, Manning Clark's A Short History of Australia ...
http://www.anu.edu.au/polsci/marx/interventions/eureka.htm quotes Manning Clark as saying that  "William Dexter, waving the diggers flag, roared to them about the evils of "English Tyranny" and the virtues of "Republicanism"." at a meeting at View Point Bendigo on 12 August 1853.  There is no description of the flag.  The article also includes refernce to Red Ribbons being worn by miner's as a symbol of defiance.  I think both this article and the Red Ribbon Rebellion (deleted as being a copyvio) should be redirects to the Anti-Gold Licence Association.--Golden Wattle  talk 20:59, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources and redirect to the Anti-Gold Licence Association
Talk:SEP-IRA

message: I'd love to see an Example section showing where the dollars and taxes go.
Evarlast 19:31, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: When did this start?  How has it changed over the years?  How has the 25% limit varied in past years?  Other changes?
-69.87.204.236 (talk) 23:23, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Has 25% limit varied in past?
Talk:Taxable income

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was Not to Merge. — Morphh  (talk) 4:12, 07 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: #Support - gpvos (talk) 18:04, 12 February 2007
#Support - Morphh  (talk) 01:20, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: In "Concepts Federal Taxation" Part II, Chapter 3, Example 4, the book says that Cara experiences an increase in wealth of $35 by installing her own spark plugs at a cost of $15 instead of having a show do it at a cost of $50. The text says that through consuption of the "labor and overhead involved in the $50 charged by the shop, her net worth has increased." I know that this concept may be better asked under imputed income, but the book treats it under "What Constitutes income", a net increase in wealth over a particular time period, through either increase in net worth or through consumption. The first is widely known and understood. But the second is not and the book offers very little dscussion or clarification. I don't even understand the logic. Also, web searches come up with nothing. can any one help? --Ryan Close (talk) 17:23, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Increase in Wealth through consumption?

message: An anonymous editor changed the definition of taxable income. I reverted the edit. Taxable income equals adjusted gross income less the greater of standard deduction or itemized deductions, less the personal exemptions. These are legal terms of art, and they don't mean exactly what I believe the anonymous editor thought they meant. Famspear 18:11, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What is taxable income?
Talk:Chip 2.6

message: What makes some generic Mr. Meaty character worthy of an article? <S>I hate Mr. Meaty anyway, but even if I loved it, I'd still say this has no point for being an article.
 --RandomOrca2 21:02, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Now now, just because you don't like it, doesn't mean it's wrong. CanbekEsen 21:05, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  But, I still find the character extremely minor. Characters in one episode of a show don't deserve an article, especially when more major characters of the show don't. --RandomOrca2 23:06, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course, characters these should be listed on a Mr. Meaty characters article. CanbekEsen 23:14, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Ok, thanks. I made this redirect to List of Mr. Meaty Characters. --RandomOrca2 23:16, 19 December 2006 (UTC)