lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Template talk:Excavata diseases

message: Any objections to adding Dientamoeba fragilis and Blastocystis?  DF is accepted as a pathogen in most countries.  Blastocystis has entries in DiseaseDB and MESH codes, plenty of clinical literature. Gastro guy 05:17, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In most cases on Wikipedia, articles for the infectious agent are separated from the disease. Is "Blastocystosis" the appropriate name for the medical condition caused by Blastocystis? If so, could we split it out? --Arcadian 12:12, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes.  And there is even Dientamoebiasis.  Would it be a good idea to move the medical info out of the Blastocystis into Blastocystosis, leaving Blastocystis with the advanced microbiology?  I'm going to re-work the DF entry as well, as it's a little thin. Gastro guy 02:22, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, that would be a good idea if you could do that split, and put a Taxobox at the top of the Blastocystis article. --Arcadian 11:40, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: All done. I'll see if I can get a photo of Dientamoeba fragilis. Gastro guy 05:44, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dientamoeba fragilis and Blastocystis 

message: This is supposed to be a diseases template (per name, title, category, etc.), but lately the emphasis seems to have shifted away from diseases to parasitology.  
I think we should move it back to dealing with diseases (i.e. disease first), de-emphasize taxonomy of organisms.  
If want to keep the focus on parasites, then the name, title, category, color scheme, etc. should be changed to make it a parasitology template.
Since there are several templates with similar issues, tried to centralize discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine#Disease navigation templates - emphasise disease vs. causative agent.  Thanks. Zodon (talk) 02:48, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diseases template 

message: Recently this template was renamed to "Unibi diseases".  As I was unable to find any citations to the term unibi or unibi disease, I have moved it back to a more readily intelligible name.  
The value of splitting the template is unclear (since the section split off was not large), but if split is to be done, should retain intelligible names for all sections.  Zodon (talk) 21:30, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template name
Talk:Holidayland

message: Hello, could this picture : :File:Senator on Elephant.jpg came from the Holidayland Circus tent ? --GdGourou  - °o°  - Talk to me 15:01, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No. The Mickey Mouse Club Circus ran from 1955-1956. The photo is from 1958. I don't believe the Circus tent was used for actual Circus performances at that point. Dgabbard (talk) 17:01, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo from a Holidayland show 

message: I removed the reference to Holiday Hill being named after Holidayland as I found nothing to support that. It apparantly was called Holiday Hill because it was meant to be recreational and/or used for picnicing, much like Holidayland was later. Dgabbard (talk) 16:55, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  relation of Holiday Hill to Holidayland
Talk:Hollywood Land

message: Shouldn't this article talk about Glow Fest and Electroncia?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bellagio2 (talk • contribs) 19:47, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Glow Fest/ Electroncia 

message: Could anyone find a picture of the new entrance as Hollywood Land and not Hollywood Pictures Backlot.65.130.161.66 (talk) 23:26, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  entrance picture
Category talk:WikiProject Finance & Investment participants

message: I have become aware, as a member, that this project is becoming increasingly more inactive.
I recently revived the WikiProject Investment and it has been growing.
So I would like to propose a merger of these two projects.It would benefit the general coverage of finance and investment on Wikipeda ´, as both of these topics have much in common.
Please let me know if what your opinion on this is.
Thanks! WikiEditCrunch (talk) 10:24, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Project merger
Talk:List of Disney featurettes

message: I wonder as pretty much everything here is listed on the List of Disney animated shorts, if this list is needed at all? Should this list be deleted and anything that isn't duplicated to be moved over there? I don't know how this works so hopefully someone may be able to sort this out. SWatsi (talk) 22:29, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: This and List of Disney animated shorts

message: For discussions regarding the over-arching clean-up of the various Disney animated film lists, please see this WikiProjects page:
Wikipedia:WikiProject Disney/Animated Film Article Cleanup.  Please add any discussion regarding same there for the time being. Thank you. Jvsett (talk) 04:46, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion Regarding Disney Film List Clean-Up
Talk:Magic Kingdom Parade

message: I expanded this article with some information from the Magic Kingdom Wikipedia article and the last three parades.  Changed it from a stub article to one that needs expanding.  I think some references are needed for the dates of parades and sections checked over.  (talk) 18:10, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Longer Stub 

message: An anonymous editor has several times added a section about a future parade, supposed to be beginning next year.  Some of it is detailed and would likely come from promotional material about the parade (it also comes on the heals of likely unrelated sneaky vandalism which was mixed in with those edits originally).  It seems unencyclopedic and certainly in need of verification.  Thoughts on finding sources?  --TeaDrinker (talk) 04:45, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The editor adding the material seems to have a history of adding non-existent or unsourced future releases of children's media content.  Unless someone can find a source for this, I suggest it is likely vandalism. --TeaDrinker (talk) 21:11, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

text: Wikipedia requires all information added to have a reliable source.  Wikipedia does not allow the addition of original research or future predictions.  --TeaDrinker (talk) 00:26, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mickey's Spectacular Parade 

message: Gumball is not even owned by Disney!!! Musicmanwp (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 00:54, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Amazing World of Gumball Parade

message: I suggest to remove all content that is unsourced or not sourced conform WP:RS (i.e. independent, reliable sourcing). I suggest to start the removal at 1 February 2019. The Banner talk 22:17, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: FYI, per official Disney information (i.e. on the Parks Blog), I've heard that the new parade - Move It! Shake It! Mousekadance It! Street Party - will debut on January 18. This is not spam, nor is it a crystal ball. Would you like me to post a link for evidence? --IanDBeacon (talk) 22:49, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have independent sources? The Banner talk 00:42, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

text: I have again removed all unsourced parades. The Banner talk 23:28, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Despite the failed dispute resolving and AN/I-complaint (both due to lack of prior discussion) I repeat the request for independent sources, conform WP:RS. The present article has no independent sources at all. The Banner talk 13:36, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of unsourced content
Talk:Celebutante

message: Time for Wikipedia to grow up.
Raise the standards of your entries by requiring proper English and grammar.
On the other hand I suggest the use of the new word "celebutard".
It is a combination of celebrity and retard, which is closer to the truth for the individuals that you want to describe a "celebutantes".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.48.21.147 (talk) 00:47, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

message: It is not in the Oxford English Dictionary, if you do a search for it at the official Oxford English Dictionary site it is not listed there, when you search the dictionary for Celebutante it comes up with "Sorry, there were no results for your search." http://www.askoxford.com/dictionaries/?view=uk Although there is a reference to this, it is from a newspaper and this is not proof that it is true. Celebutante would never be in the Oxford English Dictionary as it is an Americanisum and a slang word.
I didn't know what this term meant, I'm in the UK, but the article answered my question. Yes it may need tidying up but I'm glad that it was here. How many other people have found it useful but haven't bothered to comment?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.193.191.13 (talk) 23:16, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not in the Dictionary 

message: I move that we merge this article with the article "Developmental Disability." Pygmypony 05:28, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger Proposal
Talk:Ooh, Aah & You

message: This cites no sources as to where this was found (other than YouTube), and does not seem to contain everything; in fact, most of the episodes are from 2006, but one is from 2011, and one has no date at all. Should we improve this, or just delete it? 2601:3:100:64B:D56B:8EC2:5ABC:258 (talk) 04:41, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode List 

message: I think the two characters Ooh and Aah alone have greater identification than the title card of "Ooh, Aah & You". I would advise not to remove the image of Ooh and Aah. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 04:11, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ooh Ahh main character importance
Talk:Out of the Box (TV series)

message: Various claims that an episode was never broadcast after a particular date are certainly trivial. Additionally, making that claim without citing a reliable source is not verifiable.
Listing when a song was first used is a weak maybe. Listing the second time, describing what you though was different the second time? No, you will need to cite an independent reliable source.
That you think two episodes may be the same with a different title is original research.
Unsourced date changes in kids' TV (and related) articles is a continuing problem. Unless you can cite a reliable source for what you feel are the correct dates, do not change the dates. Please see WP:KIDSTVDATES. (Additionally, note that the year the season premiered may or may not be the date the individual episode was originally released.) - SummerPhDv2.0 17:38, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Various issues 

message: The dates the episodes aired in are severely disorganized. I realize they might be that way because of production code. Is there any remedy to this? 2600:480A:8054:AB00:4080:6CC2:294C:8718 (talk) 13:29, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Airdates
Talk:Hills and Dales, Ohio

message: Is Hills and Dales actually an incorporated village? If not it shouldn't be on the "List of villages in Ohio" article. --JaGa 05:33, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it really is incorporated, according to my offical US Census map. Nyttend 11:39, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorporated? 
Talk:Nicholas Raymond Cerio

message: Simeone George Pesare should really be referred to as "George Pesare", which is how he is most commonly known.  The problem is that I don't know how to change this without messing up the link to the Simeone George Pesare article.
SRBirch922 (talk) 03:07, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  George Pesare
Template talk:Central banks

message: If you look at the edit history, it looks like a lot of users here has been and added their "own" central bank. Sometimes, this has been reverted, but not lately. Should all be listed, or should we sort out who is the "biggest" (of some number), or what?  Greswik (talk) 22:06, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, the List of central banks provides a comprehensive list. Maybe we should remove the entire list from the template. Finnancier (talk) 06:26, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: When to add a central bank to this template?

message: I propose marking banks which are part of the Eurosystem with (E) after their name to distinguish them from those central banks who control their own currency.
What do you think ? --Robin of locksley (talk) 09:20, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Eurosystem]]banks marked with (E)?
Talk:Ron Dominguez

message: https://www.laughingplace.com/w/news/2021/01/01/ron-dominguez-disney-obituary/
When the reference was added, a link was not provided. Can someone add that? MikaelaArsenault (talk) 01:25, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: !  Happy New Year!  GoingBatty (talk) 01:34, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference is not formatted correctly
Talk:Three Sprites of the Monkey God

message: Wow, somebody got a bit happy with the tags? At least you could comment what you did in the discussion here, seriously. And it's perfectly notable, or else the other episodes would have the notability tags on them as well. What's with you people going crazy, trying to delete articles? This one does indeed suck right now, but I'll clean it up a little bit.. Not promising much, but there isn't any reason to delete it - Just make it better. Shadic 05:37, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Tags?
Talk:Enguri

message: The river and the dam are a unity: merge them for encyclopedic treatment. --Wetman 09:31, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They needs separate articles. There was no consensus to merge. Beagel (talk) 11:57, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Abkhaz name of this river is Egry {Егры). Ingur {Ингур} is a Russian  pre-stalinism spelling, and official Abkhaz name of the river for non-abkhaz languages  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Segnor Bugatti (talk • contribs) 17:12, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abkhaz name of the river 

message: kW is no metric for energy. KjellG (talk) 22:17, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  kW energy per year? 
Talk:Tony Baxter

message: Not sure what "devolping" means (beginning of 2nd para): "Devolping in Southern California, Baxter started his career...".  I'm taking it out, for now.  Someone who has access to the source material ref'd can put it back correctly. thundt (talk) 21:37, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Devolping"?
Talk:Totally Minnie

message: I have changed the release year to 1988. I know imdb says 1987 but D23's 'This day in Disney' says February 25, 1988. I'm more inclined to believe D23 considering it is a Disney enthusiast magazine run by Disney. 
That entry probably won't be there by tomorrow so I have saved it on my webspace.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vazel (talk • contribs) 21:30, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release date
Talk:A Mango-Shaped Space

message: I took out the part about Mia not being a "believable character" since that is obviously just someone's opinion.  Please keep in mind that articles need to have a neutral point of view.  This needs to read like a summary of the book, not a review.  Beggarsbanquet (talk) 17:36, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: In light of the awards the book has received and been nominated for, and futher its acknowledgement by the American Synesthesia Association (refer external link), I consider the book to satisfy the criteria for notability and have thus removed the notability warning.  I have additionally added references for these awards.  The second of these is admittedly associated with the author, but it will presumably be possible to verify this information in independent sources. 118.92.145.227 (talk) 11:15, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 
Talk:Bone folder

message: While gathering the recently added references, I looked at 6-8 origami books and found no mention, even in passing, to bone folders or any other type of folding implement — other than the human hand...  By contrast nearly every book on bookbinding I examined included the bone folder, if only in the list of recommended tools.  Perhaps someone more familiar with origami can either provide a suitable reference/clarification or weigh-in on potential removal from the article. --Dfred (talk) 16:51, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I've been doing origami for close to 17 years now, and only recently have I seen mention of bone folders. It was referenced in Extreme Origami by Won Park. I think, however, the use of a bone folder is primarily a preference issue. I only just now looked up bone folders upon seeing that reference. It could just be 'common' knowledge within the origami community (I haven't been involved with origami groups of any sort in the 17 years I've been folding, so I don't know that for certain). -Kishe (talk) 17:39, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this it is common knowledge that you can use a bone folder for origami.  eg, they sell it on the Origami USA website, see http://origamiusa.org/catalog/products/bone-folder Rill2503456 (talk) 20:51, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

text: This is simply a preference. Most origami paper is thin and pliable enough to not require a stronger tool than just your fingers while paper used for bookbinding is stiffer and sharper creases are needed for even and accurate binding. Origami that is more complicated or has smaller folds where a tight crease are needed, or origami using unusual paper is when you see a bonefolder used more.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:5B0:224C:2A28:C36:19C7:87CB:8A4F (talk) 05:05, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Use in origami
Talk:Kamui (1964 manga)

message: Is Garo magazine related to Shonen Sunday?  I am a bit confused because Kamui is listed in List of series run in Weekly Shōnen Sunday, yet this article fails to mention Shonen Sunday. Luis Dantas (talk) 17:38, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know if Kamui ever ran in Shōnen Sunday, however, the magazines are completely different. Shōnen Sunday is basically a mainstream magazine a demographic of young boys, Garo was an alternative magazine with rather adult, avant-garde manga. It gained some attention over the years, but in the end was cancelled due to bad sales. 惑乱 Wakuran (talk) 00:16, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Currently, there are two different articles for Kamui (manga) and Kamui (manga series), which feels ambiguous and confusing. Couldn't there be better disambiguation titles, such as Kamui (Nanami manga) and Kamui (Shirato manga) or something like that? 惑乱 Wakuran (talk) 01:20, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Article title

message: I would be very interested to see a citation for the claim that the series was originally just "Kamui," and not "Kamui den" when the series ran in GARO, because every Japanese source I have ever seen has used the title "Kamui den," except of course when referencing "Kamui gaiden."Matt Thorn (talk) 13:31, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: This seems to be a misunderstanding between Kamui-den having different "parts" (第一部 daiichibu [part 1]、第二部 dainibu [part 2], Kamui Gaiden, etc.) It was never just called "Kamui". I would change that to reflect this. 2604:6000:CC40:5600:6BA9:680F:9BD9:60BB (talk) 19:43, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: It was never titled just "Kamui"
Talk:Cumdach

message: Very interesting, well-researched contribution but why is cumdach capitalized at the beginning of the article? I have a feeling it is entirely accidental. Originally cumdach was the very first word until the indefinite article was added here but the capitalization remained. As it is not a proper noun, I suggest it should be changed to lower case -- unless, of course, it is on a par with the Bible, in which case it should be upper case throughout. - Ipigott (talk) 08:50, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, just a leftover. Johnbod (talk) 11:46, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why capitalized? 

message: *from p80 Johnbod (talk) 00:16, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Link

message: The introduction says "Of the St. Molaise Shrine, only the Gospels are extant...", but see Cumdach#Soiscél Molaisse and Soiscél Molaisse.  Marcas.oduinn (talk) 21:40, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: hmmm. Not sure what's happened here, but will take a look. Thanks, Ceoil (talk) 13:06, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Soiscél Molaisse
Talk:Miniature book

message: is this the only copy  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.145.56.234 (talk) 02:14, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  is this the only copy 

message: Is there a source for the 2020 Jozsef Tari donation of 5,600 miniature books to Jókai Mór City Library?Krchow1 (talk) 19:15, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source for Jozsef Tari donation
Talk:Self-help book

message: I've looked at several and they are all rubbish. Dont waste your time reading them. Study or do something more objective and factual instead. They are just garbage cranked out by publishers because people want to better themselves. ( The Prince is worth reading, but most people would not call it a self-help book. )80.2.202.35 (talk) 19:06, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  They are all rubbish 

message: "You can purchase Self help books from many online book sites"
should be removed. If you disagree, it should at least be changed to "self help books can be purchased from online book sites" Kanjo Kotr (talk) 14:25, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  last line 

message: In the  PsyBlog-Understand Your Mind , Dr. Jeremy Dean states that "the dark side of hope is that claims about potential improvement can, and are, grossly exaggerated, in order to prise open our wallets. Similarly a bright and breezy approach to potential change may lead us to believe that changing ourselves is easy, when often it requires considerable, sometimes monumental, effort". Dean, Jeremy, "Is Modern Self-Help Just a Massive Money-Making Scam?", PsyBlog-Understand Your Mind, 2008
This should be added because it explains the topic of this section in a simplified way. Maresha4 (talk) 07:00, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  More Facts should be listed in this section: Behind the self-help book explosion 

message: Self-help books may act as a placebo and thus appear to be an effective way to change an individual's way of thinking about their life and selves. This is even hinted by the title of Dr. Joe Dispenza's self-help book You Are the Placebo: Making Your Mind Matter.  
This section should be added in order to inform those interested in self-help books that this placebo effect is the psychology behind it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cellison7 (talk • contribs) 03:04, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Characteristics 

message: Idk, whether 'Advice literature' deserves independent article or to expand present article it self is better as of now parking a useful ref here.
* The Self-Help Compulsion: Searching for Advice in Modern Literature By Blum, Beth. New York
: Columbia University Press 2020 xiv + 329 pp.
 Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 15:12, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advice literature