lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Spanish Guinea

message: Who is the White father?  Caeruleancentaur (talk) 01:55, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  White father? 

message: "Spanish Guinea is preceded to Viceroyalty of Peru", But it was established in 1778 and between 1778 and 1810, it was administrated by Viceroyalty of Rio de la Plata. Why Viceroyalty of Peru is predecessor --Propatriamori (talk) 00:03, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Preceded to Viceroyalty of Peru?

message: This Article is extremely broken because: 
1. Barely mentions the initial Spanish presence from 1778 to 1780. 
2. The start date of the colony is quite unclear. 
3. British presence is barely mentioned. 
4. The Status of Spanish Guinea from 1780 to 1843 extremely foggy in the article. Kanto7 (talk) 08:52, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken Article
Talk:Spanish Sahara

message: The page states that the spanish sarah is now part of the sarawi arab republic... though it isn’t. The part should be: Now part of: Morocco Waffleduffle (talk) 11:57, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: , Morocco occupies ~75%, the SADR controls the rest. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:47, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legal problem 

message: this editing reinstate that Hispano-Moroccan Treaty of 1767 Morocco had no claim either to western sahara , the actual the treaty between Morocco and Spain of 1 March 1767 , mention in Article 18 sovereignty of sultan extended beyond the Wad Noun,  further south into the neighbouring region of Sakiet El Hamra  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ABIDALAA (talk • contribs) 02:37, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Considering the editing of the 00:52, 1 June 2020‎ 

message: What is the territory of the Spanish Sahara? Bar (talk) 04:31, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: , https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=area+of+Western+Sahara 102,703 mi. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:02, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you . I asked about the Spanish Sahara, and you found about the area of the Western Sahara. Does the area overlap by 100%? Bar (talk) 06:15, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: , Yes. This is pretty clear from the article, is it not? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:19, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Area
Talk:Free Moral Agents

message: I didn't create this page myself, but I do think that a band containing a member of The Mars Volta should be notable... provided this isn't a hoax. I haven't googled it or anything or searched elsewhere.--HisSpaceResearch 06:29, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: And look. It does seem to be real after all. This is notable enough as information, but just badly wikified and unreferenced. Almost certainly an inexperienced Wikipedia editor with good intent was the creator of this article. --HisSpaceResearch 06:33, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Should be renamed and redirected to Free Moral Agents, though, which should be linked from Owens' article, and possibly any other contributors' articles.--h i s   s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 08:26, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The last sentence in the description of this page reads:
"The group is currently finishing its 2nd full length entitled The Honey in the Carcass of the Lion for Gold Standard Laboratories. In April 2009, Owens released two live tracks for free.[2]"
However, according to their website, Gold Standard Laboratories no longer exists: http://www.goldstandardlabs.com/news.html
What should be done about this? NVSBLmonster (talk) 21:26, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gold Standard Laboratories 
Talk:Gonzalo Queipo de Llano

message: The article indicates that Queipo de Llano participated in the Rif War (a disambiguation page), but it does not clarify which one. Would someone with access to sources please edit the link in the infobox to point to the appropriate article? Thank you, -- Black Falcon (talk) 16:32, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rif War 

message: whole article is build upon gossips about this man's life, it's a poorly documented research Nedim Sancar (talk) 08:03, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Mostly value judgements on the man's personality. Terrible article. 2003:ED:6708:88C:5CD:1648:A35D:C84D (talk) 18:25, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  biased?
Talk:Alcázar of Segovia

message: "the Norwegian black metal band Tartaros." Really? There is such a band? --FinnWiki (talk) 22:02, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Huh? 

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that :File:Segovia - Alcázar de Segovia 22 2017-10-24.jpg, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for October 7, 2022. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2022-10-07. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.9% of all FPs 12:18, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured picture scheduled for POTD 

message: The non-encyclopedic phrases "Its impressive silhouette rises magnificently over ...", "the splendour of the court", and "amazing events" are NPOV. I am going to restore an older edit.
Palehose5 (talk) 12:51, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Intro Copy

message: Disney was inspired by Neuschwanstein Castle, not this meager dogshed. 2003:DC:F719:2D00:30CD:5D62:43CE:CCB6 (talk) 00:28, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disney?
Talk:List of Castilian royal consorts

message: I don't think these two should be included in this list as they were kings jure uxoris and not mere consorts. If the opposite is decided, Alphonse I of Aragon should be included as well as the husband of Queen Urraca. 176.80.113.239 (talk) 11:22, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ferdinand Il of Aragon and Philip the Handsome as king consorts
Talk:Pero López de Ayala

message: I don't know in which "Green Book" of accusations the Lords of Vizcaya became of jewish origin,from the basque that so well we knew them always to be married within the neighborhood(We,Guevaras),though they may have intermarried with other castilian noblesconversos or mixed with them in Court,later on the XV century.
Perhaps the Barroso family while in Toledo had some intermarriage with them.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.144.161.27 (talk) 19:17, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is there some reason why the article needs a drawn out definition for a royal confessor? --Kansas Bear (talk) 18:43, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Royal confessor
Talk:Archduke Karl Pius of Austria, Prince of Tuscany

message: an ancestry chart up to his great-great-grandparents did not show his imperial descendancy. Expanding it by one level, to great-great-great-grandparents, demonstrates that along paternal line he was son-by-son descendant to the emperor Leopold II.  Another benefit of such expansion is that it demonstrates how he related to the last unquestionable king of Spain, Charles IV, an info useful when discussing his claim to the Spanis throne.
Sure this info is „unncecessary”, just like the whole entry is also „unnecessary”. However, I guess it would be nice to let a reader understand what the fuss related to his Spanish claim was all about. Besides, the chart is collapsable and do not see how it can adversely affect the article in any way (clarity? complexity? bias? data overload?).
cheers,--Dd1495 (talk) 10:36, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: ancestry chart
Talk:1902 FA Cup final

message: The Sporting Chronicle article gives the venue for the replay as Burnden Park, Bolton whereas the references quoted in the article both say that the replay was at Crystal Palace.
An article on footballfocus.xsmnet.com also shows that the replay was at Crystal Palace. Daemonic Kangaroo 06:37, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Venue for replay
Talk:Kingdom of Aragon

message: Ehh, where the hell is sicily on the "kingdom of aragon 15 th century?" the island went to Aragonese hands in the 13th century by the Sicilian vespers. Some one tell me otherwise or else let me upload a new version. And what about corsica or sardina? I don't know about those. Tourskin 04:24, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They were part of the Crown of Aragon, not the kingdom, which was more or less contiguous with the modern region of Aragón. Srnec 18:19, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Right, except that you probably meant coextensive, not contiguous. --Jotamar 13:18, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

text: I know. Did you see my edit summary? I couldn't find an accurate one on any Wikipedia. We need one. (By the way, I just realised today that though I have known the definition of "contiguous" since childhood I had, humorously and embarassingly, misinterpreted "sharing a border" as meaning "coextensive", since coextensive entities do share a border...) Srnec 00:30, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The new image I added, oddly enough, calls both kingdom and crown "Kingdom of Aragon" (which thus appears twice on the map). It is also impossible to see the kingdom without enlarging the thumbnail. It is now more accurate, but it could still use improvement. Srnec 01:22, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  wrong map 

message: What was the official language of administration of the kingdom?
--Jidu Boite (talk) 14:41, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Language 

message: User:Cadiomals has been trying different maps, but neither of them reflects what is usually considered to be the kingdom of Aragon. A key point of this page is to clarify any possible confusion between what modern historians call Kingdom of Aragon vs what they call Crown of Aragon. The new maps contribute to the confusion instead of clarifying things. 13:04, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maps 

message: Dinastic Union was with Barcelona County, not Catalonia  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.14.175.64 (talk) 23:51, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dynastic union 

message: Is it true Rutger Corné Heinsius and Linde Irmgard Heinsius, who nowadays are a rare species out from the Houses of Bourbon, Habsburg, Arragon, Heinaut and Hohenstaufen, beside all the others, also earn the title King or Queen of the Kingdom Spain?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.100.67.82 (talk) 12:01, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Descendants
Talk:Blasco Núñez Vela

message: Jessica.dyer (talk) 04:02, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Kumpir

message: This is just a local name for baked potato, even having cleaned up the article I see nothing to distinguish it from baked potatoes served anywhere else in the world, except perhaps the cheese being kasar rather than Cheddar cheese or whatever. Thus it should be merged with the main Baked potato article. FlagSteward 01:04, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Diego Ladrón de Guevara

message: According to this source Diego Ladrón de Guevara did not resign the bishopric and died on 12th June 1717. Since a new bishop of Quito was elected on 12th July, the information provided seems to perfectly fit a vacancy of Quito. Furthermore the source in note 69 indicates an archive document as a first level source. --Avemundi (talk) 16:22, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: A reliable conflicting source
Category talk:Date mathematics templates

message: The overlap between the different templates actually doesn't seem too bad;
#'Month+1' and 'Ed Poor/next month' are identical except for optional parameter and 'CURRENTMONTH' vs 'CURRENTMONTHNAME'.
#'Day+1' and 'Ed Poor/tomorrow date' have similar intent, but very different implementation.
#'Daycap' and 'Ed Poor/days in month' serve somewhat similar functions.
It shouldn't be too difficult to sort these out and come up with consistent naming methods. --CBDunkerson 18:41, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overlap 

message: Note that this category contains templates that currently needed more work and unification.
Some of them are trials, and lack proper documentation and test cases. Use these templates with care, as they will need more cleanup.
Today's date is  .
The current US week began on Sunday, 
last month:<BR>       	                  			
has<BR> <BR>left in it	yesterday:<BR><BR>			day after tomorrow:<BR><BR>
next month:<BR>       	                  			
There    remaining in .
These templates help you with dynamic date calculations:
*: 
*: 
*: 
1 January 1901 was  ago.
:Right now, yesterday is wrong. It's says "yesterday: Wednesday May 1". It got the DOW right, but today is the 1st. Rocket000 (talk) 22:17, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh and the day after tomorrow is the 3rd, not the 4th. Rocket000 (talk) 22:18, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, so is it time to put this animal out of its misery? I made a whole bunch of date calculating templates a few years ago (late 2006), but maybe they have been superseded by something better. Is it time to delete the lot of them? --Uncle Ed (talk) 17:56, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Zoo (examples)

message: I need help creating a new template for infant age or possibly a combination birth date and age template.  I have looked at the templates at :Category:Date mathematics templates.  I think a template converted age for infants under 1 year to ## mos. and ## days and switched to ## yrs and ## mos. from say 1-3 and then just years above.  However, maybe I need two new templates for  and  .  I have already posted at
:#  - Template_talk:Birth_date_and_age#Infant_parameterization
:#  - Template_talk:Age_in_years_and_days#Infant_age
:# 's leading editor - User_talk:Alfakim#Infant_age_template--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM)  22:07, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: P.S. for usage see a page like the children section of Tiger Woods's infobox.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM)  22:08, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infant age
Talk:García Hurtado de Mendoza, 5th Marquis of Cañete

message: The Marquesas Islands article says that Álvaro de Mendaña de Neira named them after his patron Mendoza, Marquis of Cañete.   Alvaro’s own article says he named them after Mendoza’s wife.  This article on Mendoza has no mention of his or his wife’s eponym at all.   What’s the real story?  --  JackofOz 22:23, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Naming of the Marquesas
Talk:José Antonio de Mendoza, 3rd Marquis of Villagarcía

message: The majority of on-line sources I can find give the 1745 date for the end of his term. See Alcedo y Herrera, Dionisio de (1690-1777), Piraterías y agresiones de los ingleses y de otros pueblos de Europa en la América española desde el siglo XVI al XVIII deducidas de las obras de D. Dionisio del Alsedo y Herrera, publícalas D. Justo Zaragoza, and Historia postal de Chile. World Statemen, however, gives a third date, July 12, 1745. I realize that many of the term dates for Peruvian viceroys are in dispute. Perhaps you are right, but you need to provide some sources so we can compare. Or both dates may have some validity. It's possible, for instance, that his term ended in December 1745 and the September 1746 date is when he sailed from the colony. Or no date may be well established, and we should take all of them out and put in "1745 or 1746". Let me know what you think, and where you got the information.
Thanks for adding the birth and death information.
--Rbraunwa 04:34, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dec. 15, 1745 or Sept. 15, 1746 
Talk:José de Armendáriz, 1st Marquis of Castelfuerte

message: Jose de Armendariz was not born in Ribagorza. Ribagorza is not in the community Navarre. It is in the community of Aragon in The Pyrinees Mountains. He was born in Ribaforada near Tudela (Navarre)and baptised in Pamplona.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.21.252.127 (talk) 00:07, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jose de Armendariz was born in Ribaforada (Navarre) 
Talk:Juan Francisco de Güemes, 1st Count of Revillagigedo

message: What exactly was he count of? Revillagigedo Islands seem to have been named after his son (?) Juan Vicente de Güemes Padilla Horcasitas y Aguayo, 2nd Count of Revillagigedo, and Revillagigedo Island is also named after him. Revilla Gigedo leads nowhere useful. I found this on google, which I can't interpretate since I know no Spanish, but it seems to have something to do with the city/region Gijón. Can anyone shed any light over this mystery? Also, where there ever more than two counts of this area? /Grillo 01:20, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Count of Revillagigedo" 

message: I am a direct descendant of these gentlemen. I would like to find out more about them. I have copies of their portraits which were handed down to me through the years.70.149.184.147 (talk) 15:29, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  horcasitas history-
Talk:Juan O'Donojú

message: The infobox should note that the office of viceroy was abolished and a regency established in its place. His "predecessor" as regent should not be "himself as Jefe Político Superior". It should be "regency established". I'm not sure who his successor should be since it appears the regency simply shrank by one when he died and he wasn't replaced. 108.34.151.191 (talk) 05:26, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Predecessors and successors 

message: @60.225.201.249, 
I have to dispute characterizing O'Donojú in the opening line as Spanish-Irish. He was not born there, and as far as I can tell did not live there, had no citizenship, and apparently had no ties to the country aside from ancestry. His heritage is front and center in the Early Life section and will surely be picked up by anyone that bothers to read the article. I think that is enough. Rainier Blue (talk) 01:28, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spanish-Irish
Talk:Juan de Torrezar Díaz Pimienta

message: The asseveration about Pimienta's poisoning is "founded" on some theories figured out by nineteenth-century historians, there are no contemporary sources that support that idea. --JairoAntonioMelo (talk) 00:12, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pimienta's poisoning isn't supported by any primary source
Talk:Luis de Velasco, 2nd Viceroy of New Spain

message: The name change from Luis de Velasco to Luis de Velasco y Ruiz de Alarcón should have been discussed beforehand. Articles typically use the name best known by the public. I don't see any indication that the new name is the one by which the subject is best known. In fact, I don't see any evidence that Luis de Velasco y Ruiz de Alarcón is his correct full name. Unless someone can show otherwise, I'm going to change it back. Glendoremus (talk) 14:32, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name change?
Talk:Martín Enríquez de Almanza

message: The inquisition section is in need of some work. It need citations for one. Also it was factually incorrect. I changed the description to note that indigenous peoples were not subject to the inquisition of Mexico. The previous version stated that they were. Airflorida (talk) 13:18, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Inquisition Material

message: Almanza is a mis-spelling understandable in South America where Z is pronounced like S but in Spain they are pronounced differently and Almansa is the correct spelling as can be seen in the painting that illustrates the article, the corresponding article in the Spanish Wikipedia and the name of the town of Almansa, near Albacete. 2.137.176.185 (talk) 17:22, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, obiously is Almansa.--Zumalabe (talk) 03:59, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct spelling is Almansa
Talk:Justine (1969 film)

message: The article is without any quotes from any reviews at the time of release or closer to the present day with any media presentation.
It was released 1969 and carried the cultural freight of being based on the four intensely wide-read novels of Lawrence Durrell. However the movie bore literary source comparison with Christopher Isherwood's I am a Camera with it's fabled heroine Sally Bowles. A viewing of the film invites the casual, dismissive something to say that "It has everything in it except Robert Helpmann!"
The film failed mainly that Anouk Aimée did not have the knowledgeable star power. And the recently departed Anna Karena's inner insecurities revealed her be-devilled soul that perhaps might have been more fit for  John Huston's elaborate nonsense Beat the Devil.
These observations are offered to invite the creators of the page to see how difficult it was for reviewers to know which angle to look at the film.--Laurencebeck (talk) 07:47, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reviews
Talk:Maniac Mansion (TV series)

message: Although I agree that there should be a section comparing the show to the game, as it stands, a lot of the information is completely unnecessary. Example:
*In the game, Fred and his wife sleep in separate bedrooms; Edna's bedroom is designed to look like a prostitute's boudoir, while Fred's is empty except for a bed and a HAM radio. Five years prior to the beginning of the game, Fred stopped having sex with Edna, in addition to ceasing eating and sleeping; as a result, Edna spends the game in a perpetual state of sexual frustration, and threatens to rape male characters whenever she encounters them.
How exactly any of this information is pertinent to the television show is beyond me. Therefore, I wish to remove most of it and whip up a short paragraph detailing the (very few) similarities between the show and gameSkibz777 (talk) 00:33, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite of 'Differences from Game' section

message: I recall, and have a blip on an old VHS tape, that this was re-ran until 1998 or so by The Family Channel, before transformation to Fox Family. That's all I have, and it's just the first minute or so of an episode. If the old hard-copy of the programming logs are still archived at ABC Family's headquarters (unlikely, because logs were thrown away if no audit was required for that broadcast year), then we can see what program with what commercials ran where.
If could've also been a To Be Announced filler that was never listed. Still, the programming logs, or also-ran/as-run logs will have the info. Coffee4binky (talk) 16:05, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reruns
Talk:Pedro Téllez-Girón, 3rd Duke of Osuna

message: There is no way in the article to find easily who succeeded him in his dignities, as is standard practice on most other houses of nobility in this overall project. See for example George III of Great Britain — in this section. // FrankB 15:45, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs nobles succession boxes 