Talk:1992–93 NHL season

message: Seems like vandals have striked. I don't think Toronto won the Stanley Cup.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.195.201.60 (talk) 19:42, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I saw that 75 logo here  for 1992. I assumed that it meant the 1992-93 season. Since I am in Korea, it is difficult for me to find reliable sources for hockey. If I was back in Canada i could just look through some old magazines and hockey cards laying around that I have. But I'm not, so I can't. So, if I made a mistake, please fix it. Please feel free to fix any mistakes that I make on any article. RG has been fixing boo-boos of mine and I appreciate it very much.Masterhatch 15:50, 12 October 2005 (UTC)

text: If you're talking about formatting, then by all means go ahead and make them uniform.  However, I think that articles that lack information regarding what actually happened during the season are inferior to articles like this one that have such information.  Whatever you do, don't remove that kind of content without consensus. Croctotheface 01:45, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

message: I think that the fey milestone goals scored in neutral locations should be noted. You guys? 24.87.56.142 (talk) 02:18, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Milestone goals in neutral site games? 

message: What, this was this the only controversial incident of the entire 1992-93 season?  Does it need such a large (and poorly worded) piece of the overall article?
Perplexed 21:00, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably not the only controversial incident, and certainly there were other incidents during the playoffs (like the penalty for using an illegal stick that Marty McSorley got during the final series - it turned the tide and helped lead to a Montreal win), but the reason this is so big and controversial is because it's Toronto. The media and their fans have a tendency to overhype things like this. It's just the whole "they were robbed" idea that most fans will latch onto when their team loses. Sure, a penalty probably should have been called on Gretzky, but that happens all the time. The 1999 final Brett Hull's skate was in the crease, in violation of the rules, during the cup winning goal. If you want to go further back, look at Maurice Richard's suspension (the one that caused the riot). The Habs, and their fans, were robbed that year. 
Having said that, it would be worthy of a mention, along with other incidents (not necessarily controversial ones, but one's like McSorley's stick), but as it stands, on it's own, it's overblown.
Viruk42 (talk) 02:16, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gilmour/Gretzky. 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 1992–93 NHL season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090216033716/http://habsinsideout.com/main/3969 to http://www.habsinsideout.com/main/3969
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:04, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified