Talk:Elisabeth Shue

message: Can someone please replace the picture,it's pretty painful to look at. Sugreev2001 (talk) 20:50, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: I find only conflicting information about the tragic death of Elisabeth Shue's brother. On the web, he variously died in Rhode Island or Maine; meanwhile friends of theirs in Maplewood said it was New Hampshire. Some write that he was accidentally impaled; others that he fell into a ravine. Until we get better information, I propose that we leave it with the undisputed facts, which is that he died in an accident while on a family vacation. I think it's appropriate that we're sensitive about this and avoid sensationalizing it. Chances are more information will become available as the new movie Gracie gets press. --Leifern 00:00, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Will Shue 

message: Is this for real? I can find no reference to this anywhere else that isn't just the blurb listed here copied and pasted. Is this vandalism? James Cameron is certainly not working on such a film at present (nor is he particularly likely to ever make a movie of that sort). He's in the midst of an entirely different project at present. I'm inclined to just remove this, but I don't want to if, by some fluke, it's actually at least partially accurate.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.74.65.213 (talk) 16:24, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  She Works Hard for the Money? 

message: Except for the NY Times article (and we don't know where they got their information from), nearly all of the references to Elisabeth Shue's family are unverifiable on the internet - especially that of her father. I am removing them if they do not actually say what the contributing editor implies they say by attaching these references to unstated information (as their source).... If someone has better sources or any viable source at all please include it.  One of the 4 references attached to this section actually goes to another article that gets its information from Wikipedia - which makes it a complete loop back to this article as the original source. Stevenmitchell (talk) 02:00, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  References on Her Family Are Nearly All Unverifiable 

message: User EauZenCashHaveIt posted on BLPN in regards to the page's current image in the infobox. I agree with the user, the current image is pretty bad. Feedback from others and possible alternate pictures would be appreciated. Meatsgains (talk) 03:27, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think the age of the image matters all that much, and I would favour using the other image in the article for the infobox, even if it is a couple of years older. StAnselm (talk) 03:42, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure, I have no objection to that. I am still unsure as for how to look for an image anywhere that wouldn't raise copyright issues. EauZenCashHaveIt (I'm All Ears) 10:25, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Pinging  and : how about the images on this page? Please help me determine their copyright status. EauZenCashHaveIt (I'm All Ears) 00:27, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Why would you think any of those images are OK? In any case, it says "© 2006-2016 Fanpop, Inc., All Rights Reserved" at the bottom of the page. Probably the only free images are already in Commons; this google search shows the usable ones, but many of those results are not of Shue. StAnselm (talk) 01:46, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The images from Fanpop are a no go... What does everyone this about using this one? Meatsgains (talk) 01:50, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  Better, but I prefer the one I changed the image to, since it shows more of the face. --GRuban (talk) 18:56, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

text:  Really? You prefer an image that covers the face with sunglasses? Why? --GRuban (talk) 22:47, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: It's the older image from 2007 that we decided is better than the 2009 image you reinstated. Please look at older revisions. This picture shows more face, but is very unflattering. EauZenCashHaveIt (I'm All Ears) 22:50, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  Sorry, I disagree, I think it looks much better. I thought you meant the sunglasses one looked horrible, that I would agree with. --GRuban (talk) 22:52, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I prefer the image above over the one with sunglass and the one that was previously on the page. The one above is more flattering and her face is not covered with sunglasses. Meatsgains (talk) 03:50, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The image in this discussion is fine, the removed one is not - it looks like a paparazzi shot. We should use photos that portray the article subject in the most flattering way possible. EauZenCashHaveIt (I'm All Ears) 04:49, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: New image