lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Lists of poisonings

message: I removed the reference to Mozart being a "possible" poisoning victim, as there is no evidence for it.  There are certainly no "historical facts" that point to Salieri doing such a thing, as the article suggested.  Also, neither the stage play nor film "Amadeus" claim Salieri poisoned Mozart.  They depict Mozart as working himself to death for the sake of his mysterious client who had commissioned the Requiem.  The sole example of Salieri purportedly poisoning Mozart that I can find in fiction is Rimsky-Korsakov's opera "Mozart and Salieri," which is indeed a highly fictional account.
Actually, a few weeks before his death, Salieri said over and over again that he poisoned Mozart. He didn't. Salieri was in London at the time... promoting Mozart's works. He arrived the day after Mozart's death with a bunch of money for the young composer. He always felt poorly that he didn't get there sooner. But the story of Mozart's poisoning doesn't end there. Or rather, it begins earlier. In the days before his death Mozart claimed that he was poisoned. He believed it emphatically. It is hard to say if this was actually the case, given the description of his illness. He might have really been poisoned. SG  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.48.36.78 (talk) 04:18, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There's a problem in that those in the 'attempted' section were poisoned - they just didn't die. So how about 'non-fatal'? It seems more accurate. 'Possible' could also be called 'suspected'. Thoughts? Malick78 (talk) 20:08, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've renamed them 'Fatal', 'Non-Fatal' and 'Alleged'. The distinctions are clearer and the categories more precise.59.33.109.249 (talk) 07:16, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename sections?

message: To my knowledge he was poisoned. I mean I think it has not been prooved but the rumour is quite strong so I reckon we should put him at least under Alleged poisonings. Opinions? Jambornik (talk) 21:06, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where is Napoleon? 
Talk:Gaston County Schools

message: Still editing. All information can be found at http://www.gaston.k12.nc.us/
 B D Lawnic 17:59, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

message: standard procedure for middle schools, to avoid deleting them altogether  DGG ( talk ) 20:29, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[W. P. Grier Middle School]] 

message: standard procedure for middle schools to avoid deletion  DGG ( talk ) 20:29, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Southwest Middle School (Gastonia, North Carolina)]]
Talk:Masonry oven

message: The purpose belongs in the definition, which has to be at the very beginning of the lead. My pocket Webster's says "oven = a receptacle or compartment for baking, drying, or heating. Our article lacks this essential bit, and it shows, as the text seems to concentrate only on cooking. Or is "masonry oven" a clear, well-established phrase which only refers to cooking ovens? If so, this needs to be stated and supported with reliable sources. Arminden (talk) 21:54, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Purpose 

message: Traditional brick oven 72.252.198.39 (talk) 00:08, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Social Sudies
Talk:Cave of the Mounds

message: This is a great start to the article for the 1013 project.  Suggestions include:
#Add as many references as possible to specific statements in the article, and use inline citations to address the "citation needed" tags.
#Add wikilinks throughout.
#Improve prose and readability.  Combine sentences.
#Add NNL banner or National Park Service banner at bottom of page.
#Research if an infobox exists for caves or NNL.
#Create a stub for any redline links.
#Maybe another picture??
Overall, good start!  ChicagoPimp 16:32, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Improvements

message: It says that the limestone was deposited 400 million years ago during the Ordovician period. The problem with this is that the Ordovician took place 488 million years ago. 400 million years ago was the Devonian period. I went to the cave's official website and that makes the same dating mistake. So which is it? Was the limestone deposited 400 million years ago or was it deposited during the Ordovician? Can somebody clear this up? Dr. Morbius 20:24, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect dating of age of limestone deposit
Talk:RiffWorks

message: If someone would like to provide a more in depth and unbiased description of RiffWorks please email me for a reviewer copy at michelle at sonomawireworks.com. Mikkidw 18:03, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:A Legend of Old Egypt

message: I'd like to propose that the article name be changed from A Legend of Old Egypt to A Legend of Old Egypt in accordance with Wikipedia:Naming conventions (books) and especially Wikipedia:Manual of Style (titles): 
: Italics 
:Italics should be used for:
:* titles of the following:
:** Books (..)
:Abbreviations of the above should also be italicized.  
:On second thought, for a short story quotation marks are considered quite appropriate. --Poeticbent  talk  21:45, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I suppose I'm not the first one that notices it, but... there's not a single word about the plot of this short story in this article!!!!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.235.177.242 (talk) 00:53, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Plot
Category talk:Bijnor

message: This category will act as starting category for grouping pages related to Bijnor at one place and will also act as networking place to help improve pages related to Bijnor. May be wikipedian can create a new user category e.g. Category:Bijnor Wikipedians to collaborate more effectively. Vjdchauhan 18:06, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Effective and localized collaboration
Talk:WXXX

message: Any help on this page would be great. I'm not really an avid listener, so I may not be the best contributor. Also, if anyone wants to change the template, feel free. Does anyone know the history of this station? HammerHeadHuman 18:15, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: HELP

message: Why does this page follow the history of the callsign as opposed to the history of the station?? Georgia guy (talk) 14:05, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: The following coordinate fixes are needed for
—117.20.113.73 (talk) 18:08, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I've emended the coordinates in accordance with the information in reference 3 in the article. Deor (talk) 19:00, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error 

message: The following coordinate fixes are needed for
—103.206.230.62 (talk) 17:52, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: You haven't said what you think is wrong with the coordinates, and the transmitter coordinates in the article match those given on the FCC and Radio-Locator pages included in the "External links" section. If you still think that there is an error, you'll need to provide a (sourced) explanation of where you think the transmitter is actually located. Deor (talk) 19:22, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: @12345 196.104.138.200 (talk) 12:50, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error
Talk:Janette Turner Hospital

message: This article presently is sorted into categories under "Hospital, Janette Turner", but appears under 'T' (presumably for "Turner Hospital") in List of Australian novelists#T. Which is correct? --Scott Davis Talk 07:38, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: checked at nla catalogue, it's 'hospital'   ⇒ bsnowball  19:19, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  sort order 

message: I have commenced a tidy-up of the Bibliography section using cite templates. Capitalization and punctuation follow standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, as much as Wikipedia templates allow it. ISBNs and other persistent identifiers, where available, are commented out, but still available for reference. This is a work in progress; feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 04:30, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography
Talk:Jean Baptiste Massillon

message: Massillon (mas'sil-lon or ma'se'yon'}, Jean Baptiste, one of the greatest of French clerics and modern orators, was born at Hyeres in Provence on June 24, 1663. He first preached before Louis XIV in 1699. It was to him that the king said: "I have heard great orators in my chapel and have felt satisfied with them, but every time I have heard you I have felt dissatisfied with myself"— a saying which shows the fearless eloquence of this great orator. In 1717 Massillon was made bishop of Clermont, and next year preached his famous series of ten short sermons for Lent before young King Louis XV. He died on Sept. 18, 1742. Bossuet and Bourdaloue rival him in oratory, but he was a greater preacher than either. Among his masterpieces are his sermons on the Prodigal Son, the Death of the Just and the Unjust and For Christmas.
-- http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_New_Student%27s_Reference_Work/3-0187 — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Wednesday Island (talk • contribs) 19:17, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:Budaun

message: This category will act as starting category for grouping pages related to Badaun at one place and will also act as networking place to help improve pages related to Badaun. May be wikipedian can create a new user category e.g. Category:Badaun Wikipedians to collaborate more effectively. Vjdchauhan 18:27, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Effective and localized collaboration
Talk:Spirobranchus giganteus

message: Just created the article. Shrumster 18:32, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Created Page

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Spirobranchus giganteus (Red and white christmas tree worm).jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on July 30, 2012. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2012-07-30. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! —howcheng  {chat} 17:08, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Spirobranchus giganteus (Red and white christmas tree worm).jpg]] to appear as POTD soon 

message: It is named "giganteus" yet this article describes it as small.
What size is it please?  Wanderer57 (talk) 10:05, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I was wondering the same thing. There should be an indication of size given the "giganteus" name, even if we don't know the reason. Otherwise, readers may be left with an impression that this is a gigantic, or at least large worm. Ileanadu (talk) 04:32, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Size? 

message: "Spirobranchus essentially translates to "spiral gills," referring to the worm's unique crown. Two subspecies are recognized by the ITIS: S. gigantea corniculatus and S. gigantea gigantea."
As the species is Spirobranchus giganteus, is it correct that the the sub-species name is gigantea, not giganteus?
Wanderer57 (talk) 00:47, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Giganteus / gigantea  ? 

message: The IUCN currently lists this organism as unevaluated. Can someone remove this or provide a citation? I don't know how to mess with the boxed stuff 132.239.112.44 (talk) 18:04, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello. Welcome to Wikipedia! I have made the suggested edit for you. Editing infoboxes can be a bit confusing at first, but the Visual Editor tool can make it easy to edit templates like the Taxobox on this article. (You can read more about infoboxes at MOS:INFOBOX.) To make the requested change, I opened the Visual Editor, clicked on the Taxobox template, clicked "Edit" in the pop-up, scrolled down to the "Conservation status" option in the next pop-up, and changed the value from "lc" (Least Concern) to "NE" (Not Evaluated). I then saved my change with a short, helpful description. Now you know how to edit infoboxes and other templates, so feel free to try it yourself in the future. If you have any questions, feel free to post a message on my talk page. Happy editing! Matt Heard (talk) 08:54, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

text: Thank you. This was a helpful "how to." Ileanadu (talk) 04:35, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: IUCN Status
Talk:Private sector development

message: These links: 
*Public Private Dialogue A resource for private sector development practitioners wishing to promote investment climate reforms through dialogue (sponsored by World Bank, IFC, OCED, DFID, GTZ) 
*Financial and Private Sector Development The World Bank Group resource center.
*World Bank Group Private Sector Development Strategy
were added (and this article was started) by single purpose accounts whose edits have all been to promote the World Bank Group.  This article was even started by one.  We have recently uncovered significant edits promoting this organization (see this WikiProject Spam discussion). In the interest of our neutral point of view policy and conflict of interest guideline I've moved the links here for other editors to consider.  In general, a lot of links to one organization or links to only one POV is not considered appropriate. Thanks. -- Siobhan Hansa 20:25, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  World Bank Group POV? 

message: I think that the following paragraph (in the 6 March 2018 edition, before the introduction) is purely speculative and should be deleted.
"This trend will only accelerate as the planet’s population in the middle of this century passes 9 billion with nearly 2 billion consumers living in frontier markets of the LDCs. In the coming decades, the private sector -companies and investors- will no longer be partners in global development through corporate sustainability efforts alone, the private sector will shape the global development agenda across a wide range of sectors — food security, health, energy, environment, human rights and governance. This new era of Private Sector-led Development will fundamentally alter the landscape, transforming the roles of donors, development agencies and private companies alike. It has the potential to scale solutions to our greatest development problems — climate change, resource depletion and violent extremism while also creating new markets and investment opportunities." --Alvarosinde (talk) 11:26, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speculative contents
Talk:Cermak Road

message: In similar articles where there is a measurable stretch of a State or US route that is locally significant, there is a subsection pertaining to the named portion in the numbered route's article. If part of the task of Wikipedia is to reduce the fragmentation of info, it seeems that merging Cermak Road into the IL 56 article makes sense. Particularly given that unlike Roosevelt or Ogden -- which are consistently named where they run through the Chicago area -- IL 56 isn't called Cermak in all Chicagoland municipalities. Thoughts? Ryecatcher773 (talk) 19:29, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merge with Illinois 56 article
Talk:Levittown, Puerto Rico

message: Please remove bogus "Famous people" entries for "Julito Burger" & "Doña Carmen" added during November-December bout of vandalism. 209.6.209.51 (talk) 14:23, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Done – Þjarkur (talk) 14:31, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 29 March 2019
Talk:Archduke Joseph August of Austria

message: In Hungary there was a liberal democratic revolution on 31 October 1918. The Monarchy was abolished, republic was declared, with prime minister Count Mihály Károlyi. Later on there was a bolshevik takover on 21th March 1919, due to the weakness of the democratic government, the hesitation of Károlyi, lamely facing the advancing Roumanian army marching towards Budapest. In October there was no Bolshevik movement, the bolshevik leaders (Béla Kun and Co.) were put in jail soon (and released only on 21th March 1919). rgrds. Akela3 18:43, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revolution names and dates 

message: Currently the articles states:
On October 27, 1918 Kaiser Karl made August the "Homo Regius" of Hungary, but August asked to be released from his oath of allegiance from the Kaiser.
There is no definition of what a "Homo Regius", neither on wikipedia nor easily found elsewhere on the web.
Define, remove or rewrite...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.225.176.5 (talk) 09:13, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Homo Regius"?
Category talk:Chile

message: I've been thinking of attempting to introduce an organized system of sub-categories to this category.  The idea which seems to me to provide the most logical system is to base the divisions on the List of Dewey Decimal classes using the 10 primary divisions as the first-level subcategories.   Further subcategories could then follow the Dewey scheme as necessary.  
If this plan is implemented, it would make sense to include a link to the dewey system and perhaps a list of the 10 basic divisions on the Category main page. 
Here's how the current categories would be set up:
*Computer science, information, and general works 
**Chilean people
**Chile-related lists
**Chile stubs
*Philosophy and psychology 
*Religion in Chile
*Social sciences
**Chilean society
**Organisations based in Chile
**Politics of Chile
**Government of Chile
***Chilean law
***Military of Chile
**Education in Chile
**Economy of Chile
*Language 
*Science 
*Technology 
**Health in Chile
**Environment of Chile
**Communications in Chile
***Transportation in Chile
***Chilean media
****Television in Chile
**Buildings and structures in Chile
*Arts and recreation 
*Literature 
*History and geography 
**History of Chile
**Geography of Chile
***Regions of Chile
***Provinces of Chile
***Cities in Chile 
***Towns in Chile
***Villages in Chile
***Tourism in Chile
**Chilean culture
**Natural history of Chile
This does not reflect the existing sub categories which would largely remain as subcategories of the categories where they are.  This is simply an idea of where the existing top level categories now would be placed -- and this is open to discussion.
As you can see some of the existing categories are already top level in this system while others would move to subordinate positions.
Does anyone have any comments or suggestions about this? --JAXHERE | Talk 03:10, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes
Talk:Alpha Force

message: Why do the characters in Blood Money speak Hindi, even though in Chennai, the people speak Tamil?
Beojan 18:23, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: This article needs a *lot* of work. It's completely unreferenced, needs a copy-edit, a reduction in the length of the plot summaries and is very fannish. I'll start work on it tonight, but I don't have much time for WP at the moment and it will take me a while, so if anyone has the time to help me with this it will be much appreciated. --Aseld talk 10:26, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Work 

message: I think that the "clean-up" that was done a while back was much too thorough - I read the page and found that it was extremely boring, unsatisfactory and I didn't want to visit it at all. I gave it a clean-up of my own and it is much shorter, and less detailed than the original page, but is (at least,in my eyes) much more interesting. Grieferhate 
(talk) 16:52, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "clean-up"
Talk:Interior Salish languages

message: If Okanagan is in "southern" why is Sinixt, which I thought was closely related and also Colville et al., in "Northern" with Shuswap, Lillooet and Thompson?Skookum1 (talk) 15:17, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sinixt and Okanagan/Colville et al.

message: Are both the same matter? Isn't there a difference between the Salish language and the cultural group?--Hans-Jürgen Hübner (talk) 10:20, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, there should be separate Interior Salish (peoples/cultures/history) and Interior Salish languages articles.  Nobody's gotten to it yet, that's all.  Have at 'er.....Skookum1 (talk) 13:11, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interior Salish languages vs. Interior Salish 

message: Time for a B class review? Djembayz (talk) 02:05, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  B class review ? 

message: — Assignment last updated by Inkekwap (talk) 21:27, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: ANTH473 INLG480 Living Languages
Category talk:Barabanki, Uttar Pradesh

message: This category will act as starting category for grouping pages related to Barabanki at one place and will also act as networking place to help improve pages related to Barabanki. May be wikipedian can create a new user category e.g. Category:Barabanki Wikipedians to collaborate more effectively. Vjdchauhan 18:58, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Effective and localized collaboration
Talk:Cecil B. Moore

message: This sentence was incomplete so I took it out:
In 1966, NAACP leaders fearful that Moore2a3f4r4rrr4e hand responded by breaking up the Philadelphia chapter into smaller branches. Moore presided over the North Philadelphia branch for one year and left the NAACP on uneasy terms with the organization.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.158.127.222 (talk) 22:30, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Please fix this

message: I am trying to find better sources since the Inquirer article has been misplaced. Aside from the monuments and mural on the avenue that now bears his name, I haven't had much to rely on. Stay tuned... --Pastricide! <I>Non-absorbing</I> 18:59, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources
Talk:Kerner Commission

message: I've made two changes to the article.  First, I've removed the "neoconservative" label from professor Stephan Thernstrom...
This was done for a couple of reasons:
1. I couldn't find any citations that he was in fact a "neoconservative."  His work, as far as I'm aware, doesn't even focus on foreign policy, and "neoconservative" is generally defined as a conservative who supports a more interventionist foreign policy.
2. Even if he is a neocon, his views on foreign policy aren't really relevant to his critique of the commission's report, and the label seems to be more of a smear or attempt to discredit what he said rather than something to inform the readers of this article.
:Second, I've removed the bold from the text "black frustration at lack of economic opportunity," as this is not an alternate name for the topic of this article or something which redirects here.  There was black frustration both long before and long after this report was released.  In any case, Wikipedia article style guidelines don't include bold text as a way to simply emphasize a certain point. -2003:CA:83CE:5000:3188:3BE0:871A:1961 (talk) 21:20, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I arrived here to say that not identifying the well-known political leanings of professor Thernstrom makes his, to my mind, shallow and erroneous assertions about the Kerner Commission findings more difficult to comprehend, and I discover that there was some kind of political identification, which was removed by the previous commenter. I have inserted the word 'conservative," as the objection to the term "neocon" seems to have rested on a perhaps mistaken idea of what that word means, and the idea that it is solely attached to opinions on foreign policy. (PS the article on Wikipedia pertaining to Thernstrom identifies him as a neoconservative. But there is noting 'neo' about his conservatism.) Intersting that Thernstrom is the only voice of any note to be cited in criticism. Actio (talk) 00:46, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "neocon," bolded text 

message: There Lerner commission investigations also included findings of violence by police on several of the cities where uprising occurred.
It cut be meaningful to include that context on the summary Iggynelix (talk) 17:24, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Police reform recommendations