lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Retirement Funds Administrators (Mexico)

message: I think this article should be renamed. The title itself seems to be vague and doesn't explain this is from Mexico. In addition to this, the translation isn't quite right, instead of "Retirement Funds Administrators" it should read "Retirement Fund Managers". Danixdefcon5 (talk) 04:18, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name 

message: To some one (like me) who is utterly ignorant of the Mexican and US systems (after all, we are here to learn!), this article is a bit confusing: It is about companies that get some authorisation from a Mexican institution and is "oversees" (overseen?) by a commission that has a Spanish name. This, and its categorization, hints it describes a purely Mexican reality. On the other hand, it has an English title, no mention of Mexico in its title, and links to Individual Retirement Account, which in turn states that "An Individual Retirement Account (...)provides some tax advantages for retirement savings in the United States [of America]".
It might be beneficial to the general reading public (i.e. someone like me who is unaware of the Mexican and US systems - after all, we are here to learn!) to consider amending this article on two points:
1. state clearly in the opening sentence that the whole article relates to Mexico only (even consider renaming it to a Spanish title, which would be my choice if this is consistent with other related articles), 
2. correct either the link to IRA or the contents of the IRA article, whatever applies.
I do not feel I am sufficiently informed to perform those changes.
Cheers -- Stefan Ivanovich 08:51, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cross border relations?
Talk:Tectonics

message: This article has some sort of citation here , in Encyclopaedia Brittanica. Anyone know what's going on?--Shtove 08:48, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Britannica 

message: The German Wikipedia has an article on Geotektonik with a list of various theories on Earth formation that preceded tectonics; "Kontraktionstheorie", "Permanenztheorie" etc. There doesn't appear to be any articles on them in the English Wikipedia. Hexmaster (talk) 16:55, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Theories it made obsolete 

message: The introduction tries to explain 'tectonics' with the use of the adjective 'tectonic' twice in its first sentence. This seems rather self-referential, and does very little to explain the term to anyone not already familiar with the subject. Can anyone rewrite this to be clearer, without straying into the 'plate tectonics' description which has a separate entry? Peace Makes Plenty (talk) 14:17, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Good spot. I've revised the lede to try to remove the assumed knowledge. DanHobley (talk) 18:00, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unhelpful introduction 

message: No mention of the word within the article. 86.160.126.67 (talk) 01:42, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why does "geotectonics" redirect here? 

message: The word tectonics, according to this source , derives from the Late Latin tectonicus, although that derives from the Greek tektonikos and ultimately from tekton. The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary confirms this and records the first use in its geological meaning in 1893. Mikenorton (talk) 19:38, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology 

message: I think that the plate-tectonics map is ridiculously large and poorly positioned, but I thought I’d check to see what others think before I try to rearrange things. Anyone care to opine? — Gorthian (talk) 06:10, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed - I've made it smaller and repositioned it, but if you have an alternative in mind that takes care of the issues that you pointed out, then I'm okay with that too. Mikenorton (talk) 12:26, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. It looks much better. I did move the TOC to the right, though; I think it lets the text “breathe” more than when it’s on the traditional left side. — Gorthian (talk) 01:17, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map size
Talk:Stuck in My Throat

message: this article needs some cleaning up - there's lack on consistency in use of capitals in song names:
Stuck in my Throat
Stuck in My Throat etc
it should be "Stuck In My Throat"
other song names have the same problem
Ricmelia 08:54, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Salt Cathedral of Zipaquirá

message: I have begun work on the translation of this article. I don't have a lot of time right now, but I plan to work on it when I can. It's currently located in my user space. – Novem Lingvae (talk) 21:37, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation started 

message: Koven.rm (talk) 17:30, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translated
Talk:Édgar's fall

message: I've restored this article, which I had previously speedy deleted under A7 (web), after approach by the article's creator and subsequent research. Although I'm still fairly skeptical about this article's value and notability (and the content and style needs considerable work), it could possibly be argued that it meets WP:WEB notability criteria as a widely-ditributed "internet phenomenon" as there are more than a few independent mentions of it; see also List of internet phenomena. I for one wouldn't be that fussed if someone wanted to put it up for AfD, but given the multiple references to it which can be found it is not an absolutely clear case for speedy deletion.--cjllw | TALK 08:59, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Note re restoration from earlier speedy deletion

message: This article was saved again, thanks to all who voted to keep this. However, I can see the point of the editor who nominated the article, it lacks citations and sources and needs to be improved, check the Star Wars kid page for reference, it was also voted for deletion twice before, kept and improved. Thanks to the editor who added the links to the newspapers; altough they're in spanish, those will help a lot. As soon as I have time, I'll see how I can improve this article. Good Luck. Vicco Lizcano (talk) 19:48, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improvement, cites and sources 

message: I noticed that about halfway through the article, when discussing how the commercial was made for Emperor brand cookies, someone made it link to the page for the black metal band Emperor, which has less than nothing to do with this. I've removed the link, just wanted to point out what I had. ZaininOmega (talk) 02:39, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Emperor (band) 

message: Maybe we should have a page on this northern accent. Just an idea. RocketMaster (talk) 20:10, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question 

message: I corrected the article. The name is Édgar, with an accent on the e. I give the explanation in Spanish: Édgar es un palabra grave no terminada en vocal, n o s, luego lleva acento en la sílaba tónica.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrincodi (talk • contribs) 00:38, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  It's Édgar, not Edgar
Talk:St. George's Cathedral, Lviv

message: Suggestions are welcome:
*...that the St. George's Cathedral in Lviv, Ukraine is the center of the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church?
that's not exactly accurate, the center has been moved back to Kyiv in 2005 and a new cathedral is under construction there since 2002.
:I'll add to the article later today, and maybe will have something then.--Riurik (discuss) 18:46, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: DYK
Talk:Anjinzuka Station

message: The name of this station is in relation to one of the most influential foreigners in Japan during the 16th century (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Adams_(pilot) ) I think it would be appropriate to include a little section in history for saying that the name is related to William Adams ジュリあン (talk) 18:43, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section about name of the station
Talk:Old Prussia

message: No, I don't think the article should be merged with the origins of Prussia. I see the Old Prussia article describing the former Baltic Prussian state, while the OfP belongs to history of the Branderburg Germanic state, which only assumed the name of the former. They both used the same name, but were completely different entities, hence the confusion. --Lysytalk 09:09, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose merging, to my knowledge Old Prussia was the first of the Baltic tribes to reach a pre-state or even early state-like status, Lithuania did just take over the good start.--Lokyz 20:22, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Support merging. From where term Old Prussia is taken? I don't find this term in lithuanian historiography. Throw away your baltophilism and open your minds. Old Prussia never was a state and Old Prussians were separate tribes not a nation. Even term Old Prussia didn't existed. Prussia was always named as Prussia. In serious literature there is no such term like "Old Prussia" cause the territory where lived Old Prussians in literture is named as Prussia and nothing else. Even so, term Prussia in beginning of 13th century was applied only to territory that was near Frisches Haff, neither Sambia nore Bartia were part of Prussia in these times. The term was expanded by Teutonic knights to designate similar baltic tribes. --82.135.217.243 18:05, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Do not merge

message: Originally a redirect, "Old Prussia" was turned into an article last year. No sources are provided for its content, which largely duplicates information at Old Prussians and Origins of Prussia. That latter article itself should be merged into "Old Prussians" as well, as they essentially discuss the same topic. There was no state called "Old Prussia", while "Origins of Prussia" basically covers the same content as "Old Prussians". "Old Prussia" as a term in English publications has no uniform meaning, although it often refers to "Prussia proper" (West and East Prussia) to differentiate from the rest of the Kingdom of Prussia, or to the Kingdom of Prussia before the Napoleonic era. Olessi (talk) 18:01, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger
Talk:Ghosts (2006 film)

message: I'm quite surprised a film doesn't already have a wiki page. If anyone knows where the 'real' article is, please delete this one and change the Ghosts Disambiguation Page to point at it. Lionfish0 09:10, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Another article

message: It's been described by several critics as documentary-style. But I assume that's more because of what the director's famous for. I wouldn't say it really was a documentary, after watching it. ('twas good though!) Lionfish0 09:10, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Documentary
Talk:Meghamalai

message: The gigantic pictures on this page are terribly unneccessary. Is there a guideline to follow on removal/alteration of stuff like this? Murderbike 09:18, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unneccessary
Talk:HMAS AE2

message: Just been reading an interesting account of the AE2 and Henry Stoker in the (British) Daily Telegraph.  I have copied a link here.  
While there may be some interesting details for inclusion here about the AE2, it may also spark somebodies interest in creating a page for Henry Stoker himself.
A Taxed Mind (talk) 10:19, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Henry Stoker and AE2 

message: Our article reads:A 17-day ROV exploration of the wreck by the Defence Science and Technology Organisation is planned for June 2014.[27] Planning and training for the expedition have been underway since 2004, including practice with a fabricated replica submarine in Corio Bay.[27] During the exploration, sacrificial anodes will be fitted to the wreck, and the location will be marked by buoys to minimise damage by passing ships.[27]
Any news on this? --Pete (talk) 21:03, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  2014 expedition 
Talk:Guanidine

message: This article transcludes Sympatholytic antihypertensives template yet Guanidine is not included in that template. Should Guanidine be added there or does the template belong to this article at all? --Custoo (talk) 10:55, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template:Sympatholytic antihypertensives 

message: This article should mention Barton's base and TMG (Tetramethylguanidine).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Christian75 (talk • contribs) 01:01, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Barton's base and TMG 

message: This page is cited in Machine Design Magazine, 2007 October 11, page 12, in a letter to the editor, as an example of the how easy it is to spoof wikipedia.  Can anyone verify any of this article? JohnLeroy 15:07, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: question

message: wouldn't it be easier to write "2009" ?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jemocri (talk • contribs) 05:09, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: 148 years later

message: I would like to see more information on human consumption and pharmacological effects. In Ilex guayusa article it says that "In addition to caffeine, guayusa also contains guanidine, a proven antihyperglycemic and antihypertensive compound that stabilizes blood sugar levels and relaxes the body" but no sources are cited for this specific information. --Custoo (talk) 20:12, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Human consumption

message: What important this file contribute to the article?? (Bottle of guanidine for use in the laboratory)
It looks like a sigma company advertisement. IMHO it should be removed. --Danielchemik (talk) 22:35, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: agree, this is nonsense Whmice (talk) 21:08, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, it doesn't show guanidine but guanidinium hydrochloride. Deleted. -- 134.130.111.237 (talk) 12:44, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bottle of reagent - nonsense 

message: Typed in other language Wikipediae, guanidine could be made in two separate reactions: reacting ammonium iodide and calcium cyanamide, or reacting 'under pressurized conditions urea with ammonia. However these information lack sources so they cannot be entered into this article. -- Mountainninja (talk) 17:40, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Making Guandidine 

message: biguanide#History says "Galega officinalis (French lilac) was used in diabetes treatment for centuries.[3] In the 1920s, guanidine compounds were discovered in Galega extracts." [3] says "The active ingredient in the French lilac that produced the lowering of blood glucose was shown to be galegine or isoamylene guanidine". Could mention ? - Rod57 (talk) 13:21, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Natural sources
Talk:Guanosine diphosphate

message: This substance is new to me, but based on the minimal description here, it seems like an analog of ADP. Perhaps some discusion of the relation to the AMP-ADP-ATP, or an xref would be appropriate? --Belg4mit 20:58, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relevance 

message: — Assignment last updated by Bubbstar (talk) 20:11, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: CHEM 378 - Biochemistry Lab - spring 2023

message: — Assignment last updated by Edwook (talk) 23:12, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: CHEM 378
Talk:Guanosine monophosphate

message: The space filling model on this page is missing a Hydrogen on the Nitrogen in what I believe is usually called position 6 in purine.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.27.203.98 (talk) 15:25, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The space filling model appears to be correct to me.  It just depicts a different tautomer than the 2D image (the hydrogen atom is on the other nitrogen atom of the six membered ring).  -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:56, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

text: Yes, the tuatomer that is depicted in the 2D structure is the one I've seen most often too.  But I don't know if that's because it really is the predominant form or perhaps it's merely convention.  Since the two will rapidly interconvert, and tuatomers are considered the same chemical compound, I don't think it is "wrong" to show either one, but it would certainly be preferable to show the predominant form - and to have equivalent depictions for the 2D and 3D images.  So I found a more appropriate image and made the replacement. -- Ed (Edgar181) 19:57, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Space Filling Model is Incorrect 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :E numberE626. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 7#E numberE626 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 18:40, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "E numberE626" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Guanosine triphosphate

message: Needed for protein synthesis and nucleus-cytoplasm transportation for an example. --Artman40 16:23, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm not sure if cGTP is used in gated channels. Is it cGTP or cGMP?
Miguelferig (talk) 20:13, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: cGTP or cGMP?

message: I don't think it's supposed to work like that.
Sbcloatitr (talk) 14:22, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, it would be better if it had its own article.Tinss (talk) 14:33, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: cGTP links back to GTP page

message: Transcription does not occur during DNA replication  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.67.133.201 (talk) 22:06, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intro section 

message: and  have questioned whether this information could be correct.  you originally added the section on cGTP (yes, I realize it was 14 years ago). Is there any chance at all that you still have access to the Medical Physiology book and can help clarify things? -- Fyrael (talk) 19:21, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello  -- Fyrael. Sorry I don't have that book with me anymore, and I don't have the time to look further into this issue in a foreseeable future. Mikael Häggström (talk) 00:47, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Validity of cGTP
Talk:Puerto Natales

message: Hi, I would like to propose this external link about Puerto Natales:
http://www.jordibusque.com/Index/Stories/PuertoNatales/PuertoNatales_01.html
Please, let me know what do you think. Panex 09:23, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello Panex,  Wikipedia suggests that users beBOLD in making edits.  As long as this link isn't crassly commercial and is useful for someone who wants more details, I would't hesitate to add it to the external links section .... that's what it's there for --JAXHERE | Talk 13:47, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link about Puerto Natales 

message: I read somewhere -  that Puerto Natales was "lost" by Argentina - is this a) true and b) worth a mention?--Pysproblem (talk) 14:07, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Once part of Argentina??? 

message: Realizing that some of my recent additions erroneously stated that Puerto Natales is synonymous with the comuna in which it is located, I have created a new article for the commune of Natales and moved some pieces from this article there. Some overlap is fine, but I wanted to make it clear that this article is for the city of Puerto Natales and that the Natales article is for the whole commune. - Ruodyssey (talk) 06:33, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent additions and split

message: Let's please discuss this section instead of adding/removing per the bold-revert-discuss policy. Personally, it sounds slightly promotional as there is only one business mentioned, but I would encourage a broader Tourism section instead. - Ruodyssey (talk) 03:39, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Accommodations
Talk:Cf

message: On  there are some more definitions. Could these be added? Wiki-uk 09:25, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Acronyms Website: C&F

message: Coefficiant?  A person who has been editing Wikipedia since October 28, 2010. (talk) 21:55, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Add
Talk:Isla del Sol

message: Hi, I would like to propose this external link about Isla del Sol and the Yampupata treck:
http://www.jordibusque.com/Index/Stories/Copacabana/Copacabana_01.html
Please, let me know what do you think. Panex 09:28, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm going to put the link. Feel free to revert and discuss. Panex 17:35, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link about Isla del Sol 

message: It seems to me this picture does not belong here, as that gateway is in the Tiwanaku site, and not on the Island of the sun.
Jpjacobs (talk) 18:40, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture Gateway of the sun
Talk:PIC (markup language)

message: DISCUSSION
problem faced during programming — Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.95.192.45 (talk) 09:42, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Does anyone know what happened to figr? It's a shell site now... --202.213.201.225 (talk) 01:33, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  figr 

message: When I worked at Bell Labs "back in the day" we used to run a program cip ("pic" spelled backwards) on the Blit (computer terminal) that would let us graphically draw the diagrams and would then emit the pic code to embed in our troff's.  Can anyone dig up a reference so that we might add a line about that here? --Eliyahu S Talk 12:13, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  cip?
Talk:Raw Glory

message: As per WP:BAND this article does NOT meet the criteria for speedy deletion. The subject of the article contains three members who were "once a part of or later joined a band that is otherwise notable". Furthermore, at least one of the members is one of the most influential musicians in British rock music spanning 40 years of the progression of the genre, and has had significant influence on the development of bands such as Deep Purple. With this in mind, the article, although currently a stub, is part of the broader scope of the Deep Purple "family tree" and its intertwined branches through bands such as The Outlaws, Episode Six, Ian Gillan Band, Gillan, with further connections  with Quatermass, Curtis Knight, Frankie Miller, Andy Fraser, Phil Lynott, Phil May of The Pretty Things and Gary Barden, amongst various others. Devious Viper 10:04, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Juan Cole/Archive 6

message: When merging stuff from the old V&C page, please do not attempt one-sided obvious POV statements of debates.  Isarig moved a Jew-baiting quote from Karsh to this page without also moving the specific response Cole published to that ridiculous and incendiary claim.  (The claim is, as Cole pointed out, "beneath contempt").  Isarig is well aware that the debate had two sides yet he only puts one side of the debate on the page - I think that if we're going to be merging incendiary claims that seem to violate BLP, we cannot censor the responses to those claims.  This piece should not be turned into a character assassination, and quotes comparing Cole to the Protocols of the Elders of Zion do just that.  If they are going to be included I will insist that responses to them be included.  The other Isarig edit I changed had a link to something Cole published on his blog in 2003 -- it is unclear why Isarig would have included that link without including Cole's followup which specifically explained in 2005 what Cole meant. It seems to be just a way to try to make Cole look bad, though I won't speculate on Isarig's motives.
Also, I'd like to ask all editors to consider using edit summaries when making significant and controversial changes to this page.  Thanks to all.csloat 21:23, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Views and controversies
Talk:Cinderella (Ashton)

message: May this be moved to Cinderella (ballet)? — Robert Greer (talk) 01:10, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  move to Cinderella (ballet)  
Talk:Rajat Tokas

message: Removal of subjective and what may be construed as id-otic comments by a female teenage fan of this actor (i.e. "he is very cute and so cute and totaly cute.").66.130.128.191 (talk) 03:36, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of Childish and Inappropriate Comments 