Talk:Driver 3

message: The official site hasn't worked for quite some time now and should be removed.
Alternatively there is a mirror on the Driver Madness fansite at http://www.drivermadness.net/main/mirror_d3.php However I'm not sure if this is allowed under wikipedia's rules becausesfddfdb it's a mirror of an official site so I'm not quite sure. I'll leave it up to you editors Driver Madness 10:23, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Official Site

message: This should be added to this article. Professional Gamer 21:18, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Film Director criticism 

message: I remember that there was a competition of some kind and the winner was inclued in the game.
And the winner was from Finland. If somebody knows more about this, it would be nice if he/she could write it in to the article.
The was a competition for a face scan to be put in the game by the development team reflections interactive.
There was also a competition for a spin around in some hot wheels. Some for of Muscle Car. It was basically a stunt driving course in those wheels. --Driver Madness 10:31, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wasn't there a competition... 

message: I am rather surprised to find no mention of the "Driv3rgate" controversy. I don't have much editing power or time right now, but if anyone is interested in a little muck-raking, you can get your start here and here. A little Googling would probably net some more info. The aggressive use of shills in message boards and unrealistically glowing reviews in exchange for favors... Tsk tsk, Atari. That's the sort of behavior that gets you sent home with a note for your mother to sign. ~ JohnnyMrNinja 05:06, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: And now the section reads terribly. I couldn't figure out if it was users saying that everyone BUT the UK reviewer were giving the game shit reviews on purpose, or if it was just the UK reviewer doing it for some anomalous reason. I had to go to the citation article to figure out what anyone was saying. C'mon, guys. - anon
This may be the result of systematic censorship being carried out by parties who are still actively involved in covering up the scandal.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.141.113.39 (talk) 14:08, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The "3 Major Gaming Scandals That Were Buried | Fact Hunt" youtube video brings to light this nonsense.  IMHO the article needs to be locked against anonymous IP addresses.--BruceGrubb (talk) 16:45, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Stuart Cambell's archive of gamesRadar.com's "Driv3r Reviews. Were PSM2 & XBW honest? (Part II)" thread can be found at world of stuart in mht format.  It is only 42 pages of the some 64 page thread because the "reporter's forum account was banned without warning or explanation by Future"--BruceGrubb (talk) 16:24, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Driv3rgate 

message: The Pc version came out nearly a year later (15.03.05) than the Ps2 and Xbox 1. 83.108.196.34 (talk) 13:38, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Realeese dates are wrong 

message: I couldn't find any reliable sources that call this an open world game. Permission to take it out of the category?Dohvahkiin (talk) 17:24, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Nevermind, I found three sources which indicate it is.Dohvahkiin (talk) 17:39, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: These sources indicate the game is linear instead of free-roaming: http://xbox.gamespy.com/xbox/driv3r/525384p1.html?fromint=1
http://m.gamerevolution.com/review/driv3r
http://www.gamespot.com/reviews/driv3r-review/1900-6101203/Dohvahkiin (talk) 20:37, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Open world