Talk:Clinical psychology/Archive 1

message: I moved the history bit to the top of the article. Also, I added "Other scientific perspectives" - feel free to edit. The "scientific" bit is of course important, considering the diverging unscientific opinions on this subject out there. Narssarssuaq 21:51, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  History paragraph moved 

message: I started a section on this, similar to those on similar pages. Just didn't seem right without it. EverSince 19:39, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  criticisms/controversies 

message: In the UK, the three main therapeutic models are cognitive-behavioural, psychodynamic and systemic (family therapy and social constructionist approaches).  See here, for example:
http://www.ucl.ac.uk/clinical-health-psychology/Pages/AcademicInfo.htm
It might be helpful to have a section on systemic approaches, though this may then mean discussing international differences in clinical psychology models and training.  Londonmatty20 13:08, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Theoretical Orientations 

message: I saw the request for more info on training in an edit summary and responded.  I have added more detailed information on the licensing and training for masters level practitioners.  
The same kind of info should be available for the doctoral level.  Because the courses taken are very similar for doctoral programs, I suggest that the course decriptions should probably be merged into a common paragraph but with a few sentences that explain the differences in total semester hours, the additional requirement of a dissertation and the emphasis on research that is part of the doctoral degree.  That way a generalized description of the courses could work for all licensing levels. Steve 20:12, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Steve, would you be willing to reformat the Masters training info into bullet form, like the doctorate list above it? I think the paragraph form is a bit difficult to read. Also, I think it would be useful to have info about the usual number of units and other requirements, like a thesis. I can do this, but you probably know more than me about Masters programs. Psykhosis 20:41, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure, no problem.  Give me a couple of days.  Best Wishes, Steve 23:27, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: On the Training Section 

message: This article has been tagged for well over a month but still hasn't been cited, and still contains lists that amount to original research.  Is anyone working on citing the article?  SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:25, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Tagged for almost six weeks, no response, delisted GA.  SandyGeorgia (Talk) 07:43, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA status 

message: Another talk page archive. Left the GA discussion because someone really should tackle that project. —Ash(talk) 02:09, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Archived

message: Original Text:
:: Unlike the PhD, which is a third level academic degree, the MSW is considered a professional degree (a second level university degree) and is sufficient for basic licensure in most states. < ref >http://www.aswb.org/lic_req.shtml< /ref >
After a cursory review of the site indicated in the original link source, the closest I found to matching this statement is the following:
:: Can  I obtain a license with a non-social work degree?
:: With a few exceptions, no.  There are a few states that offer “associate” type licenses for people without social work degrees (check requirements in the online comparison guide), but those exceptions are extremely limited. For the most part, you must have a degree in social work (BSW or MSW) to obtain a social work license. < ref >http://www.aswb.org/SWL/faqs.asp#NonSWDegree< /ref >
suggesting a full rewrite on this, with the new link source. --Vorik111 (talk) 21:23, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  licensing 

message: What does "To date, medical psychologists may prescribe psychotropic medications in Guam, New Mexico, and Louisiana and military psychologists." mean?  Is it meant to continue "... and military psychologists may prescribe <such-and-such>."?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.122.27.39 (talk) 18:33, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unfinished sentence? 

message: The image :File:DSM-IV-TR.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here.  In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.  Please check
:* That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
:* That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --06:11, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Image copyright problem with File:DSM-IV-TR.jpg

message: There are other texts from authors with a wider research and clinical experience than Plante. Introduction to Clinical Psychology (6th ed) by Nietzel, Bernstein, Kramer and Milich is one example.  Ajoykt (talk) 16:44, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The Plante reference is one out of 89 references in the reference list, so your section header about "all references" seems rather bizarre. Some of the other 88 references, such Compas & Gotlib, are cited more often than the Plante reference. Your attempt to remove a published reference to a widely used text by a reputable publisher (now in its 3rd edition) without a clearly stated reason seems odd. It seems especially interesting in view of your recent proposal that the author's biopage on WP be merged into a separate topic. If the Neitzel et al citation has added value beyone the Plante citation (which isn't necessarily the case - books by committee are sometimes hard to read), it can be cited in addition. -- Presearch (talk) 17:40, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is there a reason why all references have to be to the Plante book? 

message: This article has been edited by a user who is known to have misused sources to unduly promote certain views (see WP:Jagged 85 cleanup). Examination of the sources used by this editor often reveals that the sources have been selectively interpreted or blatantly misrepresented, going beyond any reasonable interpretation of the authors' intent.
Please help by viewing the entry for this article shown at the page, and check the edits to ensure that any claims are valid, and that any references do in fact verify what is claimed. 
I searched the page history, and found 4 edits by Jagged 85 (for example, see this edit). Tobby72 (talk) 16:10, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Misuse of sources

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Clinical psychology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.apa.org/monitor/dec99/ss13.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061214135515/http://www.abpp.org:80/abpp_certification_specialties.htm to http://www.abpp.org/abpp_certification_specialties.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080819231047/http://www.deakin.edu.au/hmnbs/psychology/pdf-docs/pathways-melb.pdf to http://www.deakin.edu.au/hmnbs/psychology/pdf-docs/pathways-melb.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060618114758/http://www.apa.org:80/crsppp/schpsych.html to http://www.apa.org/crsppp/schpsych.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081208123505/http://www.bartleby.com:80/61/19/O0021900.html to http://www.bartleby.com/61/19/O0021900.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:51, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This article describes clinical psychology as it developed in the USA and the training there. That ought to be clarified  further and the development and training in other counties could be added. USA was important in the historical development but the article should cover the rest of the world too. Ernestrome (talk) 10:11, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  American centric 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Clinical psychology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060725225202/http://www.apa.org:80/ed/accreditation/qrg_doctoral.html to http://www.apa.org/ed/accreditation/qrg_doctoral.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:21, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hi all. I'm planning to insert a paragraph under "assessment" on clinical and statistical prediction. Something along the lines of that seen here Paul E. Meehl#Clinical versus statistical prediction. Vrie0006 (talk) 03:44, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Clinical versus statistical prediction

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Clinical psychology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080819231047/http://www.deakin.edu.au/hmnbs/psychology/pdf-docs/pathways-melb.pdf to http://www.deakin.edu.au/hmnbs/psychology/pdf-docs/pathways-melb.pdf
*Added  tag to http://www.psichi.org/pubs/articles/article_73.asp
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081208123505/http://www.bartleby.com:80/61/19/O0021900.html to http://www.bartleby.com/61/19/O0021900.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110715125840/http://psycholocareersblog.com/ to http://psycholocareersblog.com
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:52, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The ABPP specialization list on the main page was incomplete. Here is the original list:
*Child and adolescent
*Family and relationship counseling
*Forensic
*Health
*Neuropsychological disorders
*Organization and business
*School
*Specific disorders (e.g. trauma, addiction, eating, sleep, sex, clinical depression, anxiety, or phobias)
*Sport
The full list can be found on ABPP's website http://www.abpp.org/i4a/pages/index.cfm?pageid=3285. Missing from the above list are "clinical neuropsychology pediatric subspecialty", "clinical psychology", "cognitive and behavioral psychology", "counseling psychology", "geropsychology", "group psychology", "police and public safety psychology", "rehabilitation psychology". 
I would propose either the whole list or no list be included. I vote no list because the whole list is too long and too specialized (e.g., just one organization, only relevant in US), for lack of a better word, for the main clinical psychology page.
:I agree that the list isn't necessary. —PermStrump(talk) 17:51, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  ABPP specialization list was incomplete 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Clinical psychology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061214135515/http://www.abpp.org/abpp_certification_specialties.htm to http://www.abpp.org/abpp_certification_specialties.htm
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.bartleby.com/61/19/O0021900.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:52, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Clinical psychology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://archive.is/20060927062930/http://www.psichi.org/pubs/articles/article_171.asp to http://www.psichi.org/pubs/articles/article_171.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:17, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified