lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Cortical reaction

message: The articles should definitely not be merged.  They are completely different proceses.  70.105.121.30 16:03, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Acrosomal reaction merger

message: How long does cortical reaction take? Is it possible that two spermatozoa can reach the inside of an oocyte? What would happen then? --Abdull 12:41, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Time

message: The cortical reaction and zona reaction are different aswell, are they not ?? Isn't it correct to say...
 
Cortical Reaction: hyperpolarisation of the ovum's plasma membrane leads to release of cortical granules into perivitelline space, initiates zona reaction.
Zona Reaction: cross linking of Zona Pellucida proteins leads to the hardening of the Zona Pellucida, sperm receptors in zona pellucida destroyed Silverbhagwat (talk) 18:23, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: 'Zona Reaction' & 'Cortical Reaction' Different??

message: I am considering developing this page further as part of an educational assignment in Fall of 
2013. If someone else is also working on this, please send me a message and let me know 
soon, so we donʼt duplicate initial efforts in page development Blairwal (talk) 21:40, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Cortical Reaction Project?
Talk:Kammaṭṭhāna

message: I vote against merging this article into Kammatthana, just on the basis that someone may be specfically looking up kasina, and this seems like a good concise discussion.  As long as it links to Kammatthana and vice-versa, why merge?  Ultraviolet777 15:16, 31 March 2006 
:I also vote against merging.  The concepts are fairly different, kammatthana being a verb meaning work or place of effort, while kasina is an actual object of concentration.  I haven't ever associated these two terms, personally.  Obhaso 07:24, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I also vote against the merge.  Based on my reading of the Visuddhimagga and related material, kasinas are ten of the 40 meditation subjects identified by the term kammatthana; that is, a subset of practices.  Thus, in my mind, this article should no more be merged with the kammatthana article than other articles on other kammatthana practices such as the Brahma-viharas, Metta, Anapanasati, mahabhuta, etc. In addition, as indicated above, the kasina article could be referenced by other articles (such as, jhanas) without referencing the kammatthana article (especially since, I think, the term kammatthana is probably more obscure, less known to Westerners than kasina). Larry Rosenfeld (talk) 19:12, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Kasina]]? 

message: I removed the first sentence and reworded the second of the following paragraph found in the lede of this page,
The kammatthana collectively are not suitable for all persons at all times.  Each kammatthana can be prescribed, especially by a teacher (), to a given person at a given time, depending on the person's temperament and state of mind.
My reasons for removing the first sentence were that it largely rephrases the second sentence and also that it is potentially POV and is not cited or phrased in such a way as to indicate who has stated this opinion or why this is so. makeswell (talk) 03:37, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  I removed a sentence from the lede and rephrased another 

message: Was there ever a discussion about merging Kasina into this page? Wikiman5676 (talk) 03:32, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge from Kasina
Talk:Vale Royal

message: I hope I haven't trodden on any toes by doing this, but I took as a precedent the project about Cornwall. I've listed a proposed project concerning Cheshire on Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals. I think it can easily co-exist with Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography. I would not want to diminish or withdraw from this other project. If you are interested in contributing to this proposed project, please add your name to list at the appropriate place. If you think it might be better placed as a sub-project of the existing UK Geography Project, please say so on that project's talk page, here, and let us discuss it. Many thanks.  DDS  talk 18:16, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: A Possible project (or sub-project) for Cheshire
Talk:Typhoon Karen

message: Finish it. Be sure to link to the main seasonal article. Hurricanehink 20:30, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: JTWC PDF report on Karen NSLE (T+C) at 06:05 UTC (2006-04-03)
Once this is longer than a stub I'll add a track map. — jdorje (talk) 23:27, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Brought in a pic of Karen from the old documents where I got the others. Jake52 My talk 22:42, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nice pic! Hurricanehink (talk) 01:53, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Todo

message: I'm in the process of expanding Typhoon Karen, I've already done some work on it. I'm gonna do more later. I believe i have enough information to get it to start, but I'm not sure, I'll just have to see. P.S if i made any spelling or grammatical errors you can fix them. Hurricane-Inu 22:25, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nice. You should talk to Hurricanehink to see if it's a Start. íslenskur fellibylur #12 (samtal) 00:38, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion
Template talk:User bs

message: There is NO need to put Bosnian in cyrillic. It is an extinct cyrillic scrpit. 
From the article Bosnian Cyrillic:
"Bosnian Cyrillic is an extinct Cyrillic script,that had mainly been used in Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia, Dalmatia and Dubrovnik in particular. Its name in Croatian and Bosnian is bosančica and bosanica (Croats also call it Croatian script, Croatian-Bosnian script or Western Cyrillic). Serbs use the designation Bosnian Cyrillic- in order to stress its affiliation with greater Cyrillic cultural areal."
I think that the people who do not know cyrillic are not repressented by it. I, for instance, do not know any cyrillic, but do speak Bosnian. If you go to the Bosnian Wikipedia. In its policy it states that ONLY the latin script will be used. 
HolyRomanEmperor, I respect your views, but putting Bosnian in cyrillic is incorrect. If you are going to say that Serbs use it, than it is (by even them) considered the Serbian language, since they consider themselves Serbian. 
(You say that you speak Srpsko-hrvatski, people can argue that it is an extinct language. My point for this view is that Srpsko-hrvatski does use both, however, the Bosnian language does not use it as its standard)
I do not want this to go into a huge debate and I do not want this to head into the deletion template page. 
My points are that Wikipedia Bosanski [] uses only the latin script, that Bosnian Cyrillic is extinct, and that most Bosnians do not use the cyrillic scrpit. You probably know this: About 50% are Bosniaks, 17 % Croats, and 35% Serbs. There is a huge majority (almost 75%, including Bosniaks, Croats, and others of Bosnia and Herzegovina) that do not use the cyrillic script. 
Thank You --Kseferovic
----
Actually if I am not mistaking cyrilic is also an official script of Bosnian language.  However it is common knowledge that mostly Serbs use it and most commonly refer to it as being a script of the Serbian language.  It is more of a political game rather than a linguistic one.  I personally don't mind cyrilic however it is in use in Bosnia about as much as ancient german script is in use in Germany.
Relative to this disussion I don't see point of changing or adding cyrilic to Bosnian user box partly because it is simply not commonly used but also because Serbian language user box does not note latin script as well while latin is also official script in Serbian language.
As for Bosnian wikipedia, it is a matter of technical functionality that the Bosnian Wikipedians have decided to use latin script only. --Dado 05:28, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

message: Bosnian language uses both Latin and Cyrillic alphabets; from Bosnian language.
No idea what you mean by those other posts. I feel that they are a little too harsh (but hey, that's just me) --HolyRomanEmperor 15:42, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ugh
Talk:Jaz-O

message: Working on disambig links specifically Joy on the to do list. This page links to joy, I have done a little research and the name Joy that is referenced here on this Jaz-O article is the name of a performer "Almond Joy" I am unsure of how to change the disambig link and am asking for help. I found an old album here where you can see the name Almond Joy on the record label (i think anyway). But the description of the album states "description: First Jay-Z record from 1986! Features Jay along with fellow crew members Jaz-O (then just known as The Jaz) and Almond Joy. " I am wondering if this would be an instance where you would create a disambig page for almond joy or where you would link this particular "joy" to. Thanks for any help in advance. TattØØdẄaitre§ lĖTŝ tÅLĶ 17:04, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: In this case I do not think that an entry on the disambiguation page is needed.  Wikipedia does not have an article for the performer in question.  Usually, but not always, red links are not added to disambiguation pages.  If you think the performer "Almond Joy" is deserving of a Wikipedia article you can write one.  I recommend you use your sandbox to draft the page, and if you would like me to help with that, I would be happy to.  For now I have removed the wikilink from the name "Joy" in this article, until we get this worked out. —    Bill W.    (Talk)  (Contrib)  — 18:45, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually I am really grateful for your response. I think you did good removing the link as there isnt much about info out there about the performer at least not enough to come up with an article about him/her. Nice of you to offer me help with writing an article though as I havent actually done one yet. One day I might get the guts up to do so =) Thanks Bill w. TattØØdẄaitre§ lĖTŝ tÅLĶ 05:52, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Working on disambig links re: Joy 
Talk:Quiapo, Manila

message: The campus section was only one sentence and information is contained elsewhere on the page, so I got rid of it. Tripnoted (talk) 05:04, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Campus
Talk:Dutch Defence

message: Note that links to commercial web sites (e.g. sites selling chess books) are not acceptable in Wikipedia. - Hayne 20:57, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links 

message: Note that Staunton Gambit is set up to redirect to this article, but there is an article Dutch, Staunton gambit.  Should that article be merged into this one?  Should Staunton Gambit be directed to that article instead? Krakatoa 04:40, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Just checked and this is now a separate article. ChessCreator (talk) 20:46, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Staunton Gambit

message: It seems a number of sources have incorrectly credited Staunton with the analysis of the 2.h3 line. As can be verified by examining the sources, he took his analysis directly from the Handbuch des Schachspiels published in 1843. MaxBrowne (talk) 08:34, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Staunton analysis of 2.h3 

message: Article says "(hoping for the naive 2...h6 3.Bh4 g5 4.Bg3 (4.e4!? is also playable) f4? 5.e3 fxg3?? 6.Qh5#)".
This is a minor sideline, but BCO2 devotes two lines to it, so clearly it's not just hoping for a cheap trap that even a beginner would see through. I'll delete this nonsense, but I have no idea what to write about 2. Bg5 in its place. Maybe just listing it as a second move that has been tried is enough. 2.24.117.17 (talk) 06:55, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  2. Bg5
Template talk:Comment3

message: Number 3 templates are designed to be blunt stop it templates, used in response to consistent breaches despite warnings. Earlier warnings are designed to be advisory and to offer guidance. Numbers 3 are always blunt no-nonsense stop it templates. Number 4s are you will be blocked if you do it one more time, while number 5 are you have been blocked templates. Their language and tone is graded by the seriousness of the warning. FearÉIREANN\(caint) 21:03, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Explanation of levels
Talk:Dartmouth University

message: This item should really fall under the Dartmouth College history section, and should not have its own article.  Perhaps a redirect would be more appropriate. -- Mkamensek (talk) -The LeftOverChef 21:03, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree -- there's way too much information here to clutter up Dartmouth College with it, and it's legitimate for inclusion because of its involvement in the famous Dartmouth College Case. I'm going to remove the merger tag -- it's six months old. Dylan 15:26, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed Merge
Talk:Tampa Red

message: Thanks for writing the Tampa Red article.  The man is a respected and influential guitarist, and is highly recognized among contemporary blues guitarists.  This article was long overdue! --"buck 21:06, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What was he Tampa Red's song which Bill Haley recorded? Help!  :-)  Stephan KŒNIG 19:48, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bill Haley... 

message: This article lists his real name as Hudson Woodbridge.  I have seen references elsewhere as "Hudson Whittaker", for example on the liner notes to Marcia Ball's "Let me Play With Your Poodle" CD, the title song of which is credited to Hudson "Tampa Red" Whittaker."  - W.E.Smith 04/2007 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Waltesmith (talk • contribs) 00:54, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The AllMusic Guide mentions Whittaker and Bill Wyman's Blues Odyssey attributes the song "The Duck Yas-Yas-Yas" to Whittaker.  "tampa red" whittaker gets 905 hits on Google as opposed to 327 hits for "tampa red" woodbridge, and many of those are probably copies of the Wikipedia article.  That would lead me to lean toward Whittaker.  Is anyone here who can say which is correct?  --Christophernicus 04:55, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct Real Name? 
Talk:Templeton Secondary School

message: I added a band called the Pack A.D. which has been the subject of many industry articles and has been featured in many television shows, movies, and video games. The band was removed by another user who gave "not notable" as the reason. Since "notable" is a subjective metric (one that I would argue the Pack A.D. meets), I think it would behoove us to define specifically what parameters we are using to deem whether or not an alumnus qualifies. Johnnycanuck88 (talk) 17:36, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  By what metric are we assessing what constitutes a "notable alumni"?
Talk:Sgòr an Lochain Uaine

message: I've altered the IPA pronunciation from [sgɜ:r æn lɒxən uwɪn] - which is an exaggerated anglicised version - to what I think is a broadly correct Gaelic (or at least educated Scottish) version, [skor ən loxən u:ən]. I'm not positive this is right though (in particular I don't know whether either or both o's should be [ɔ], and whether or not the u should be long), and I'd appreciate it if a Gaelic expert who's familiar with IPA could revise if necessary. Blisco 21:26, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation
Talk:Darkened Skye

message: *https://archive.org/details/pcgamer200112/page/n35
*Computer Gaming World review
*Game Informer review
*PC Zone review
*PC Gamer US review
*Short CVG preview
*Nintendo Power review
*Discussion in Branded: The Buying and Selling of Teenagers
*GameSpy preview with developer quotes
*GameSpot on DS and marketing
*GameSpot news
*GameSpot E3 hands-on
*GameSpot first look
*IGN news
*IGN news
*IGN preview
*IGN first look
All I've found. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 19:16, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference material 

message: Probably will be made till 2054 Year.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.219.252.94 (talk) 12:51, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Darkened Skye 2 Planned
Talk:Solarization (physics)

message: This page was sourced from a contribution by Bery Hickman to Solarisation and moved here for clarity. Velela 21:35, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Source

message: It seems weird to have articles one two completely different topics distinguished only by the British vs. American spelling.  I would suggest moving them to one of these six pairs:
* Solarization (physics)/Solarization
* Solarization (photography)/Solarization
* Solarization (physics)/Solarization (photography) + a disambiguation page
* Solarisation (physics)/Solarisation
* Solarisation (photography)/Solarisation
* Solarisation (physics)/Solarisation (photography) + a disambiguation page
195.176.176.226 14:58, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.--Redeagle688 (talk) 02:27, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Took a while for someone to act on this! I chose Solarisation (physics), Solarisation (photography - primary meaning so not needed in the page name) + a disambiguation page. - Fayenatic (talk) 13:38, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brit/American spelling 

message: The text says solarisation is a temporary change, but then describes examples which are 'sometimes' reversible by special treatments. Surely a 'temporary colour change' would be one which reverses itself over time? Stub Mandrel (talk) 17:03, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Temporary or Permanent 

message: — Assignment last updated by Cunning8 (talk) 00:03, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Special Topics in Physics - Modern Physics
Talk:J. E. Casely Hayford

message: This article continually refers to the country now known as Ghana, as the Gold Coast. While it’s true that this name was in use during Mr Caysley-Hayford’s lifetime; I don’t believe that it’s ever really made clear that this nation’s name changed at independence over half a century ago - which is perhaps strange considering the subjects active struggle during his lifetime for African independence & his anti-colonial outlook Nakii Quarms (talk) 12:40, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gold Coast
Talk:Bushel

message: Something is screwy about the last part of the History section.  All of a sudden it is talking about gallons.  Either these facts are out of place, or there is some relationship between the gallon and the bushel that is not clear from the text. ike9898 21:37, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A bushel is eight gallons, and has been since the Magna Carta. Wendy.krieger 08:02, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Gallons

message: The large number of digits used in the equivalents is pointless and distracting.  For what it's worth, Google calculator (as a unit calculator) differs with the present article in about the 8th digit in the metric equivalent to a bushel. Robert Hiller (talk) 06:27, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Significant digits 

message: It should be made more clear that the cubic inch measurements are for different bushels - not for their respective gallons.72.231.18.127 23:40, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: We need to figure out which of the ones listed were used for dry goods. --Random832 (contribs) 15:33, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

text: Assize of Bread and Ale indicates the existence of a bushel of eight wine gallons [1848 in³ if the wine gallon is the same one used now, or the volume of sixty-four pounds of wine. The pound described appears to be the tower pound; eight tower pounds (as understood today) per 231-cubic-inch gallon gives a density of 0.74 kg/L]. http://sizes.com/library/British%20law/Carysfort_Wine_Gallon.pdf discusses this and suggests the existence of a wine gallon of 224 in³. --Random832 (contribs) 13:08, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bushels vs gallons 

message: One bushel of oats is 38 lbs, 0.01723651 Metric Tons. Heikkiwp (talk) 09:35, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  US 

message: Real world bushel baskets tend to have rounded bottoms, at least around the edge. Real world bushel baskets may have straight or sloping sides. But the definition of a bushel volume (18.5 in diameter, 8 in high) would be a perfect cylinder. So it is surprising and confusing that the Bushel article features a Queensland 1875/1878 brass Standard reference bushel with sloping sides and rounded bottom. Did most historic reference bushels have sloping sides? This historic detail about defining this volume measure deserves mention. Also, the Bushel article should include a good photo of at least one typical ordinary farmers market bushel basket. (This photo is mis-titled. The Queensland object itself is clearly engraved A.D. 1878, not 1875.) -71.174.175.150 (talk) 16:08, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  1875/1878 ref sloping sides 

message: * Review of Bushel of Corn.
 — LlywelynII 07:24, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources for article expansion
Talk:Fender Bronco

message: In essence, the Bronco is a single pickup version of the Mustang, just as the Esquire was a single pickup version of the Telecaster.
Both of these claims are misleading. The Esquire came before the Tele. The Bronco lacks the very thing for which the 'stang is most famous, its tremolo arm. Andrewa 21:40, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:The Millennial Project

message: I haven't read the book, but I don't see much in this article which justifies an "aviation" stub citiation.  Should that be removed? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brian Sayrs (talk • contribs) 21:56, 31 March 2006
:I read the book and I agree it has nothing to do with aviation.  Also, although the book may lack a section on every single step required to achieve colonization of space, it does have the grand vision of an ultimate goal that NASA seems to be terrified of discussing for fear of revealing that they are Star Trek/Star Wars/Heinlein fans.  If the single most powerful nation in the world can't take a millenium-long view, we will fail to achieve the goal.  Heck, we can't even agree that we may totally devastate the Earth through climate change.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.121.18.98 (talk • contribs) 17:46, 9 May 2006
::Indeed.  I don't agree with some of Savage's philosophical stances, so to speak, but I definitely think we need to start planning for the longer term and colonizing space is an integral part of that—a viewpoint which is sorely underrepresented, in my opinion.  Even if the steps we follow turn out to be very different, the book has described some very clever ideas, and (perhaps even more importantly) expressed a wonderful sense of enthusiasm and spirit of progress that seems to be missing from today's lethargic space programs. 164.55.254.106 19:10, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Aviation stub

message: There is very little material on Living Universe Foundation that is not already on The Millennial Project: Colonizing the Galaxy in Eight Easy Steps and there does not seem to be enough to justify a separate article. If a large enough amount of material about the foundation is added to the project article, then it could be split out again, but for now it isn't very useful.  -- 159.182.1.4 17:05, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like that's what was done, because clicking on Living Universe Foundation redirects to this same article.  I removed the link since LUF doesn't have its own page to link to. -- Strumphs (talk) 15:54, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: The article currently reads: "The author fails to address the dangers of cosmic rays as well as any potential measures that may be taken to mitigate those dangers. No argument of the dangers of solar flares or coronal mass ejections is presented in this book."
This is incorrect; Appendices 3.6 and 3.7 of the book are specifically devoted to radiation hazards, including solar flares and cosmic rays. I'm updating the article to remove these two sentences.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.12.253.223 (talk) 02:24, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cosmic Rays and Solar Flares