lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Erich Bärenfänger

message: too much approval information, which is not relevant for a nazi person->it indicates a disputed picture--78.104.4.82 (talk) 12:39, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 2007

message: I have a problem with the speculation of who was in charge when it seems like a piece of OR to me and needs to be attributed to a source.
* "Kaether, in command for less than a day, never physically took command" -- TRUE (but needs a citation)
* "and was functionally replaced by Hitler." -- Who says so?
* "Bärenfänger commanded the garrison acting as the dictator's deputy." -- Who says so?
* "On 23 April, Hitler appointed General Helmuth Weidling to command Berlin's defenses.  Hitler appointed Weidling shortly after cancelling his own orders for Weidling's execution." -- TRUE (but needs a citation)
* "In the general confusion caused by Hitler's rapid changes, Bärenfänger, as Hitler's deputy commander, fits in between the commands of Reymann, Kaether, and Weidling." -- This seems like OR to me unless it can be shown that most sources support this interpretation it needs to be attributed in the text to the "best" source that makes this claim. Quotes on this talk page from reliable sources would help clear up this issue. 
-- PBS (talk) 05:07, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: September 2011
Talk:Liquid fluoride reactor

message: I agree...but the assumption that producing "only" this amount hinders deployment  because the amount of U-233 would be inhibited is a narrow way of looking at deployment, isn't it? One could use U-233 from other sources? Use plutonium, etc. I doubt the idea that all the fuel starts for all MSRs or LFRs would spring from one "Mother" LFR is it?
DavidMIA (talk) 12:48, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Question on part relating to "109%" being "slow"

message: I've proposed merger back to Molten salt reactor which already covers the issues for liquid fluoride salt reactors in a more detailed, balanced, referenced, and encyclopedic way. A duplicate article for advocacy purposes is against policy. (WP:CFORK)
LFRs are a subset of MSRs, so one might offer the justification that this article is a subarticle of MSR. However, almost all the content in Molten salt reactor is about reactors using molten fluoride salts, the subject of almost all work to date; the article is not so large that it needs to hive off subarticles because it is approaching the size limit; and subarticle content still needs to be harmonized with the summary left in the main article. --JWB (talk) 23:25, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The reason we set up the Fluoride Reactor entry is because it SEEMS the MSR entry is Sodium oriented. It is not obvious, as you suggest, that the MSR entry has Fluoiride for "all works to date". Secondly, but actually more importantly, almost all R&D in the world is Sodium oriented and the reactors being researched, both Fast and Thermal spectrum, as Sodium ones, not fluoride ones. 65.117.234.99 (talk) 21:57, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Molten salt reactor hardly mentions sodium at all. It only mentions that the Aircraft Reactor Experiment had sodium as a secondary coolant (the fuel salt was fluorides), and this is a very small part of the article. --JWB (talk) 04:37, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

text: OK, I do not oppose merging it...but this one has information in it that is very valuable. What would you suggest?65.117.234.99 (talk) 21:30, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you list which points are in this article and not in the other one? Then we can go over them and add to Molten salt reactor. --JWB (talk) 00:22, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Given no response and that most of the article is duplication, I propose to go ahead and convert this article to a redirect to Molten salt reactor on May 1. If anyone can identify content which is not duplicated and add it to Molten salt reactor, please do so. --JWB (talk) 07:13, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplication of MSR article
Talk:Ernst-Günther Baade

message: Too few information about his life in combination with a list of awards it indicates a disputed picture. --78.104.4.82 (talk) 12:55, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There's lots more bibliographical information in von Senger und Etterlin's book (see full reference in article) – feel free to add it to the article. --Wally Tharg (talk) 22:28, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs more detail and balance

message: Baade is famous for supposedly wearing a Scottish kilt. Does anyone have a photo of him in this getup? 207.8.173.133 (talk) 14:32, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Kilt

message: Please let me know if there are any concerns. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:32, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article cleanup per 2012 tag
Talk:The South Is My Country

message: (see official website)
Translate info from the Portuguese Wiki! = October 2013!90.244.87.189 (talk) 17:45, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Paskahousu

message: What is the correct translation of "paskahousu"? IMO "shitty pants" translates into "paskaiset housut" or "paskahousut". Literally, "paskahousu" translates into "shit-pant". It means roughly "the one that wears shitty pants", or figuratively "a coward".Punainen Nörtti (talk) 13:13, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I propose that the correct English translation is without the -ty. The statement is about the person, not the pants.  It's a compound noun, not an adjective plus a noun.  Paavo273 Revised by Paavo273 (talk) 23:12, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:Stourbridge fair

message: "Largest fair in Europe" seems not to take into account the cloth fairs of Champagne. Shouldn't it be "largest in England", and tied to a time-frame?--Wetman (talk) 13:18, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

message: The photo showing the river Cam and the houseboats does not show Stourbridge Common.  It shows Midsummer Common, a good kilometre from Stourbridge Common. Dr Martin Boycott-Brown (talk) 10:24, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Dr Martin Boycott-Brown Good eye! I've replaced it with a photo actually of Stourbridge Common. the wub "?!" 21:55, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrectly captioned photo
Talk:Golos

message: I made the executive decision to undo the redirect to Jacob Golos due to the commonness of the name, the fact he is long dead, most people have never heard of him and the great many other uses there are for it.  The "Golos" Google search didn't have a reference to him until halfway down the page, and that was to the Wiki redirect to his article, a proverbial search-engine self-fulfilling prophesy.  I hope my fellow Wikipedians will agree. J.A.McCoy (talk) 13:50, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Big Sandy High School (Big Sandy, Texas)

message: Infobox was added a while ago Indyjrg1762 (talk) 04:50, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Operation Popeye

message: This term for the Popeye missions appears only in Jack Anderson's column in 1971 and the terms only appear together (not seperately as in seperate operations). While the names were later accepted by DOD in the senate hearings as meaning a reference to the rainmaking operations in Laos, its unclear if they were ever used. The name for the operation inside the miltiary was "motorpool". At a policy level, Popeye or "Pop Eye" was used through 1968. After 1968, the missions don't seem to have even come up at a policy level. 70.234.250.22 (talk) 16:38, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intermediary-Compatriot 
Talk:Military history of the North-West Frontier

message: Some suggestions for improving this article: 
* References - there are large tracts of information without a reference
* Internal links - many of the internal links in the article do not exist and need to be created
* Some of the information is disjointed, or does not flow in an easy to read and understand narrative
If anyone can help with this, it would be greatly appreciated. Cheers.AustralianRupert (talk) 09:55, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Am now aware of this episode. FwdObserver (talk) 02:55, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

text: The Third Afghan War 1919 Official Account does mention Amritsar in the context of other disturbances in the Punjab in April 1919, so it is relevant. FwdObserver (talk) 02:55, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestions for improvement

message: "The cotton was dyed grey with a derivative of a dwarf palm known as mazari, while the leather was dyed khaki with mulberry juice. Thus was military dress first coloured khaki for its camouflage effect, and the Guides were the first troops to wear it.[52]"
The source of Jackson's assertion here is not clear. The factoid quoted above  has been repeated many times since his book 'India's Army' was first published in 1940. There is no no evidence that the mazari palm, used mainly for weaving,with some limited food value, has any utility as a dye stuff. In the long list of 'Indian Dye  Yielding plants' there is no mention of mazari palm. (Natural Dyes from Forest Biomass. PDF Download  from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/272480240_Natural_Dyes_from_Forest_Biomass.)
Mulberry dye, in this instance comes not from juice of the mulberry fruit, Morus nigra but either from the roots and bark of the Indian mulberry, Morinda citrifolia (See above). Alternatively, the dye known as old fustic is produced from the heartwood of  the  Dyers' Mulberry plant, Chlorophora tinctoria/ Maclura tinctoria.  (See: http://www.maiwa.com/pdf/natural_dyeing.pdf)  
Berries in general are generally categorised as ineffective, or'fugitive' dyestuffs, although it seems Morus Nigra can be used to create a purple dye (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_dye#cite_note-46), which is not relevant to the military context here, although it was the exterior of sheepskin coats- poshteen- to which Jackson was referring ('jerkins of sheepskin'], rather than leather accoutrements.
JF42 (talk) 21:40, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guides khaki.
Talk:WWF-India

message: The article has been reverted to an early version, due to word-for-word copy/paste from this site, which is against the copyright policy and legally not allowed. If someone wishes to rewrite, summarizing, paraphrasing, and properly citing sources, that would be lovely. Ariel♥Gold 16:42, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violation 

message: Please do not copy word by word from the original website of WWF-India, change the words to your own, making some changes in each sentence. At the end then include original sources in references. See other articles in "See also" section.
Atulsnischal (talk) 16:47, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removing copyrighted text
Talk:Star Breeze

message: Why does the code look different on References and Notes?
Splamo 00:57, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I think this needs to be fixed. Move this article to 'Seabourn Spirit' and delete this one. Splamo 00:52, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have completed the move manually, as an automatic move could not be done to due to "Seabourn Spirit" already existing as a redirect to "The Seabourn Spirit". I've also manually moved this talk page. -- Kjet (talk) 14:43, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Move

message: There are some serious discrepancies between the stats at Fakta om Fartyg and those at Seabourn's company website:
:
FoF                                   	Seabourn.com
Delivered 1989    	Maiden voyage 1988
9,975 GRT                             	10,000 [presumably GT]
The same tonnage discrepancy exists for the sister ship Seabourn Pride (whose tonnage is given in the Wikipedia article as "9,961 gross tons", without reference. The ship was (according to Seabourn) refurbished in 2007, which could have involved a change in tonnage; however, there is no serious difference in the ship's dimensions as given by FoF and Seabourn.com.
Normally one would expect the company website to be more authoritative than a privately maintained site; however, normally FoF is accurate, and the data are quite detailed and specific, and 10,000 is a suspiciously round number. Also, Seabourn.com states that Seabourn Spirit (IMO 8807997) was previously Royal Viking Queen, while all other sources (not just FoF) appear to agree that in fact the former Royal Viking Queen is the current Seabourn Legend (IMO 9008598), and so I'm inclined to think the company has been rather sloppy. Any suggestions how to resolve this?  --Lambiam 08:50, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: We should be using independent sources wherever possible, therefore FoF, would take precedence. If the ship is registered with Det Norske Veritas, then there should be plenty of info there too. Mjroots2 (talk) 10:45, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: On the other hand, we should be using reliable sources – and under the Wikipedia definition of "reliable source" it is not clear that a self-published site like FoF qualifies. Of course, the website of Seabourn is also self-published, but there we have an exception: under certain conditions self-published sources may be used as sources of information about themselves, which I think applies here. Furthermore, although the inclusion criterion of Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth, I should hope that if different sources contradict each other about a simple fact, we should attempt to figure out which is correct and which got it wrong – reliable sources also make mistakes, such as the Brockhaus with the length of the Rhine. What I am hoping for is that there is a database of some independent registration authority.  --Lambiam 20:37, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discrepancies
Template talk:User sk-0

message: My Slovak is very rusty, but I do know that "Tento redaktor po slovensky" doesn't mean what it's supposed to (my guess is "this editor in Slovak"). It should translate into "This user does not understand Slovak (or understands it with considerable difficulty)", or an equivalent. Can anybody help? (Audionaut (talk) 14:48, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit userbox content, anyone?
Talk:Yoshihiko Noda

message: The Japanese version of this article contains significantly more content, which may be useful for expansion.   — C M B J   00:11, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: If only most people could read it! The Big Hoof! (talk) 19:13, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content 

message: Why is he styled "the Right Honourable"? Is this a translation of a Japanese title? If so, this should be noted in the text. Intelligent Mr Toad (talk) 07:24, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: You're quite right - it's wrong. The Japanese government refers to PMs in English as "His Excellency", such as here. I've added the proper title in.VsevolodKrolikov (talk) 10:07, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Style (formal title)
Talk:Hiroko Ōta

message: The word “female” looks redundant there, especially given that the person's gender is already evident from the picture and, at least to those who are familiar with Japanese, from the name. You never hear somebody saying “Ron Paul is a male politician.” Mortimer Lanin (talk) 17:54, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  “is a female Japanese politician”
Talk:C. Hassell Bullock

message: Bullock is a notable theologian as well as the current president of the Evangelical Theological Society (an extremely influential group of believers).  There is no reason why this article should be deleted.  It should be expanded to show the influence Bullock has had on Evangelical Christianity. Kristamaranatha (talk) 22:40, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Barack Obama Muslim rumor

message: User:Andyvphil first added Template:Notaballot explicitly in response to a user who disagreed with him.  That template's usually reserved for AfDs which're facing sockpuppetry or external vote-bombs, not for expressing your dissatisfaction with fellow editors' opinions. Quit using the template to make a point, Andy. Shem(talk) 15:28, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: My dissatisfaction was not with anyone's opinions, but with failure of some to engage in the debate, which the template reminds them is policy. If you wish the template to be used only in cases involving sockpuppetry or external vote-bombs I suggest you go to the template page and argue for inserting that instruction for its use. Barring that, the use I have in mind seems legitimate and your edit warring, to keep a statement of policy off the discussion page, inappropriate.  Andyvphil (talk) 22:19, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This discussion is really more appropriate for a talk page as it doesn't really have anything to do with the AFD itself. Andyvphil, there is nothing bogus about not notifying anyone that the discussion page is in use. Heck, Shem didn't even have to notify you that he had started the talk page. Anyone with this page on their watchlist will notice that there's been a new addition on the talk page and anyone new will notice that the discussion tab is no longer red-linked. --Bobblehead (rants) 22:57, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

text: I withdraw the word "bogus". It appeared to me that he had put it on a sub-page rather than the discussion page. I am convinced that I was mistaken. My apologies. Nonetheless, unless I get a reply soon, I'm putting the template back up. Andyvphil (talk) 02:50, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I see you've retracted your hasty accusation, Andy; that's good to see.  As for your misuse of Template:Notaballot, I'd strongly discourage you from edit warring, and suspect someone else'll remove it again should you continue pushing its contested insertion.  Whether or not you choose to edit war (and approach violating the three-revert rule in either letter or spirit) is your decision. Shem(talk) 07:06, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Andyvphil, Template:Notaballot, and [[WP:POINT]]
Talk:Autoacceleration

message: I am aware this page is not formatted correctly. This is my first article (actually an interesting assignment from a professor) and I am limited by time constraints. This page does have proper sourcing, it just needs to be cleaned up. Seeandyspin (talk) 15:30, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: These two topics both deal with the same phenomenon.  Autoacceleration is how is it generally described and would be the preferred article name.  Also, the autoacceleration article is better developed. ChemGardener (talk) 01:19, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. --Aushulz (talk) 00:17, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

text: Also agree. By the way, I think the lede of this article needs to be written in a way that is a little more accessible to the casual reader (i.e. one with little knowledge of chemistry). 85.228.208.58 (talk) 11:23, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge [[Hazardous polymerization]] into [[Autoacceleration]]
Talk:Mahmud-i-Raqi

message: The coordinates lead to a place somewhere in the Parwan province (according to Google-Earth).--Zaccarias (talk) 22:22, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. I've set the coordinates using this map and Google Earth.--Zaccarias (talk) 13:17, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  wrong coordinates? 
Talk:Joseph Miller

message: This is a disambig page. Its only purpose is to distinguish ARTICLES about subjects with similar titles.  Red-linked listings do not belong here because that means there is no article to disambig and direct people to.  Also note that not every Joe Miller is notable to be have an article in the first place. Please read both WP:D and WP:Note before adding yet another Joe Miller which may be deleted again.  --Fife Club (talk) 04:15, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages)#Red links there's nothing in itself wrong with red links - they just need to be would-be articles linked from somewhere else already. --Simmo676 (talk) 23:21, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please stop adding non-existent articles
Talk:Lawsonite

message: This article was added to by Richard Lu for the University of Houston course GEOL 3370 introduction to Mineralogy, Prof. Jonathan Snow, Instructor.  Topics added include info on Andrew Lawson, composition, geological occurrence, crystal structure, physical properties, and the significance of lawsonite.
:And when the above was done it created incoherent article. Compare the first section with the section "physical properties", both  repetitions and contradictions (is it has Mohs hardness of 8 or 7.5?). Among other things there is something that looks out of place ("Franciscan Formation in California (Fig. 1)") where is Fig 1? Avihu (talk) 21:50, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Belinda (Edgeworth novel)

message: I've added a character list, but I didn't have time to include lots of important characters, such as Mr. Vincent, Virginia, Mrs. Stanhope, et cetera...and I see a few mistakes. Please help! ㅠㅠClassical Esther (talk) 04:00, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Character List
Talk:W9 (nuclear warhead)

message: The article speaks of a <<"bullet", which was fired down a tube by conventional explosives into the rings assembly to achieve critical mass>>, but if you take a look at the Little Boy article, it is more likely the other way round: a tubular set of rings fired onto a core. --BjKa (talk) 14:29, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Layout
Talk:Kaoru Yosano

message: Is there a reason this article can't decide on whether to put family names first or last?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.193.153.214 (talk) 08:46, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japanese names order 
Talk:Mayerling (ballet)

message: Ballets (and contemporary dance) choreographers usually say that they "make" a dance "on" a dancer or company, not that they "create for". Robert Greer (talk) 23:58, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Usage 

message: I’d like to suggest rewriting the synopsis so that it provides a more detailed and chronological account of the ballet's narrative, including scene divisions. Would there be any objections? Thanks, OperaBalletRose (talk) 10:34, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Synopsis 
Talk:K. M. Azhar

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.dawn.com/news/216776/km-azhar-passes-away. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  💵Money💵emoji💵Talk💸Help out at CCI!  02:42, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Mary Emelia Mayne

message: This article needs a significant deal of expansion, as the influence of the Mayne family, particually James and Mary Emelia Mayne is widespread amoung Brisbane. Rotovia (talk) 16:39, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This article currently violates ADB copyright and needs to be fixed.--Grahame (talk) 03:23, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Historical Importance