lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Compact Linear Collider

message: Dear , according to the page called Template:Clear the template is "Often used to stop text from flowing next to unrelated images". After your change, the image "Gas-cooling vertex streamlines" is next to the section "Status" which is not related at all. I am not sure that removing the clear template was the best idea, maybe you might want to reconsider your change. Thanks. EnesGonultas (talk) 08:21, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: With the clear there is excessive whitespace on desktop computers. An image going a bit into the next section is okay. --mfb (talk) 08:56, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  About clear template removal
Talk:Rawatbhata

message: Note:  Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 09:14, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition 
Talk:DELPHI experiment

message: please see http://delphiwww.cern.ch/delsec/finalrules/FINALrules011203.html 
below is a copy of the sentence within the above linkDrift chambers (talk) 14:04, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The website is working fine, and there's no reason to remove it because the DELPHI collaboration restricts access to its raw data. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 00:18, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  access denied
Talk:Sandvik

message: I just noticed that almost the entire page is copied from this page. Curious to know if this really is allowed. --85.225.25.168 20:33, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is a copyright violation, and no, it is not allowed. See Wikipedia:Copyright problems for more information. I have deleted the offending section. Luigizanasi 02:39, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyrights? 

message: ticket:2013011010006896 is related to this article.  It is not yet sufficient to allow the text to remain on Wikipedia, but should be checked for possible updates before deleting the article.  – Philosopher Let us reason together. 04:20, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: We have received clear permission and I've templated this page.  Removing the copyvio notice now. – Philosopher Let us reason together. 21:05, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  OTRS pending 

message: All of the content on this page appears to come directly from Sandvik sources and not independent sources. That suggests that some of the editors here may have undisclosed conflicts of interest. I have informed User:Wikianki of our policies in this area. --Macrakis (talk) 13:58, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Conflicts of interest?
Talk:Horeca

message: The link to the " Uniform Conditions for the Hotel and Catering Industry - Koninklijk Horeca Nederland" is broken the new link is: https://www.khn.nl/tools/uniforme-voorwaarden-horeca-engels   — Preceding unsigned comment added by BrouwerDavy (talk • contribs) 10:49, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Broken link

message: Is horeca also a zoning designation? I see it listed as an option when looking for places to rent.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by Axcelis555 (talk • contribs) 07:55, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Request

message: I don't know Dutch, but this word seems to be used the way we use "hospitality" is English. See also this training certificate description: http://nlnrp.nl/userimages/horeca-assistent%20-eng.pdf . --Busy Stubber 21:13, 24 July 2007 (UTCazar magaray with eme college col khuram
: As far as I'm concerned, "horeca" is essentially Dutch, and would not be understood in English - English words simply aren't formed in this way - or most other European languages. To say it's "used in Europe" is surely an exaggeration. Today I saw it (in the even more un-English form "HoReCa", with intermediate capitals) on the English website of a Spanish company, and have asked them if the site was composed by a native Dutch-speaker who didn't bother to have the English checked (I'm afraid Dutch-speakers have a habit of doing this)! Oddly enough, the term "catering" seems to be used for this, even though "catering" normally means preparing food and drinks for consumption outside the hotel and restaurant sector.213.127.210.95 (talk) 15:38, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  I fixed this. The information contained herein about Dutch food service and hotel industries, has been incorporated into the English article Hospitality industry. "Horeca" is not a separate "thing" to write about. And I am fluent in Dutch haha.Keizers (talk) 18:26, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  It is also widly used in French (at least in Belgium and Luxembourg) as a simple word to talk about places serving food and breuvages. Martin m159 (talk) 17:09, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Acronym or foreign term?
Talk:Talwar-class frigate

message: Range for vessel given 4500tons.  Please correct.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.51.149.41 (talk) 07:24, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Range? 

message: Where do we insert the fact that the russians has orderd 3 ships to its own navy? Some user dont want to edit this to the current Talwar article. Should we then create a Krivak IV frigate article cause its not Admiral Sergey Gorshkov class frigates or krivak III class? Walle83 (talk) 21:37, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Info about new frigates was added in page of Burevestnik (Krivak) class frigate. For arrangement: Talwar class is 1135-family frigate upgraded and determinated for export (specially for India), which will be now ordered for Russian Navy too. It will be expected some changes between ships for India and Russia. Project 11356 for Indian Navy is in India named Talwar class but in Russia it is still Project 11356 Burevestnik-xyz(???) frigate.--Hornet24 (talk) 22:51, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Talwar class for the russian navy 

message: INS Teg Homeport Cochi or Mumbai/Karwar?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Versova (talk • contribs) 03:23, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Homeport 

message: 4 new ships are being constructed now, which will most probably have latest sensors and missiles. That needs to be updated as a new block of Talwar class ships. SReader21 (talk) 13:56, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Armaments of 4 new ships 
Talk:Windsor-Essex Catholic District School Board

message: Proposed deletion?  Non-notable?  No way!  
This has got to be kept, along with all other School Boards.  PKT 20:35, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I like what you have done with this.  I think that these school boards aren't very notable by themselves, but if you flesh them out and list the schools which they administer, that helps a lot. --Brianyoumans 13:24, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Good job

message: Thanks to PKT for adding to the page, and shame on Brianyoumans for trying to delete a page for a community that they've obviously got no information on. This school board is a publicly funded entity that serves a community of over 200,000 people. It is regularly mentioned in newspapers and other media. Why the vendetta against Windsor? The smaller the community, the longer it's going to take to flesh out stubs. That's just the nature of things.
*I'm afraid I'm not going to apologize here; fundamentally, school boards are just not that notable - they are all pretty much the same.  In an encylopedia with global coverage, what is unique about this school board that someone not from Windsor would consider interesting?  Frankly, very little. Schools I consider a bit more notable - many people pass through a high school in the course of its history.
*As to a "vendetta against Windsor", I AM in fact conducting a campaign against Windsor articles, but only because I happened across some Windsor-related articles that I considered non-notable, discovered that there was a whole category for Windsor, and then found a bunch more that I thought should be trimmed.  75% of the articles are just fine, and I'm glad that folks in Windsor have written such good articles on their city; however, I think it sets a bad precedent to have, for instance, articles on non-notable local churches, articles on fairly generic hotels, and articles on the university's non-notable student newspaper. Some of these articles have been improved and the prod has been removed; some have been taken to AFD, and are passing quite easily - I don't think my judgement on these articles differs greatly from that of the general Wikipedia community. --Brianyoumans 23:15, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Thanks
Talk:Tata Ace

message: One reason it was built was that drivers said if they had a four wheeler instead of a three wheeler it would help them get married. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gbleem (talk • contribs) 22:14, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  It will help you get married. 
Talk:Tata Indigo

message: This article was written as an obvious advertisement. I fixed that, but just by slashing out large parts of the article. It would be great if someone with more time could find relevant information and make this article more complete. Then maybe the tag at the top of the page can be removed. 99.135.175.17 (talk) 00:44, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Making this article actually decent 

message: The previous image was of Tata Manza which is another car from the same manufacturer. This image is more relevant and hence I have changed it.
Apoorvaphale (talk) 12:45, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Changed Image in Infobox
Talk:Tata Novus

message: * http://www.tatamotors.com/our_world/press_releases.php?ID=199&action=Pull
* http://www.tatamotors.com/our_world/press_releases.php?ID=191&action=Pull
* http://www.indica.co.za/tata_motors/articles/20060619_horses.htm
* http://www.hindu.com/2005/11/15/stories/2005111504381800.htm
--soum (0_o) 20:48, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Usable references 
Talk:Tata Sumo

message: The article says that the Tata Sumo is one of the first in India designed passenger vehicles. The problem is that the design is from another manufacturer named Mekong Auto Corporation which assembled this Design from 1992 to 1997 with their Mekong Stars-4WD. So the Tata Sumo is a license built vehicle or it is a illegal plagiarism. --91.89.156.99 (talk) 16:14, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Indian Design????
Talk:Queen Elizabeth Stadium

message: There is also a stadium in Enfield, North London with the same name, Queen Elizabeth Stadium. I am fairly new to Wikipedia so I am unsure as to how I would create another article of the same name, or even if that is possible, should the name be slightly different? 
There is some information on this stadium at this website
So any suggestions on how to proceed would be appreciated.  Brzak 20:36, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:National Centre for Biological Sciences

message: This article can be titled "National Centre for Biological Sciences" rather than "The National Centre for Biological Sciences".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Varthy (talk • contribs) 15:40, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.ncbs.res.in/history. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  MER-C 13:04, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: See also Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/20130127. MER-C 13:04, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Udaipur Solar Observatory

message: Note:  Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 09:31, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition 

message: Suggested requirements for the article:
* History
* Telescopes
* Observation
* Photos
* Visitors
* External Links
* Further Reading
Prad2609 (talk) 11:49, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outline for the article
Talk:Rocket candy

message: I don't think a detailed recipe is appropriate here.  There are plenty of web sites around, and WP links to some of them (a link to Nakka's site, or Jimmy Yawn's, might be appropriate on this page).  Also, you say the text is a blatant copy, but don't cite a source or provide evidence you're allowed to post it here.
Wikipedia should have information about rocket candy, what it is, history, use, etc, but recipes and instruction manuals are not generally encyclopedic.
As such, I have reverted the howto section.  Evand 20:45, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If you are going to be that precise, then should really specify whether this is weight/weight or volume 193.39.157.76 (talk) 14:08, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Howto

message: So, some of the website links are outdated, and there are some new advances in sugar fuels that have come out, so this page needs some additional updating. -K  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.197.104.10 (talk) 02:12, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outdated links, etc. 

message: Hi all.  Unless there is strong opposition, I would like to delete the reference to chlorates as an optional oxidizer for R-Candy formulae.  Reasons:
1) It is not commonly used for this purpose.  By far the most common oxidizer for R-candy is Potassium Nitrate, to the near-exclusion of just about any other.
2) It is unsuitable for use by beginners/novices (reasons follow), who are the most likely type of person to come to a Wikipedia page for information on making R-candy.
3) It has numerous chemical incompatabily issues.  Examples include sulfur and ammonium salts, both of which are likely to be found where rocket motors are being made.  These incompatibilities can lead to dangerous, shock/friction/temperature sensitivities which could cause a mixture to explode without warning.
4) Chlorate/fuel fixture tend to have very low ignition temperatures.  For example, Potassium Chlorate and lactose (one of the R-candy fuels mentioned) will ignite at a temperature of 195C.  This is below the melting point of lactose, so it is easy to imagine a novice R-candy experimenter having a container full of propellant spontaneously ignite.
Although chlorates have been used in the past, I believe the dangers make them entirely unsuitable for anyone other than experts who are well versed in the art, and who are fully informed of the dangers of, and precautions necessary when, using chlorate oxidizers.  These experts do not come to Wikipedia for R-candy formulas.
Thanks, and sorry for the long-winded explanation.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kejones62 (talk • contribs) 23:29, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of Chlorates 

message: At what temperature does the mixture ignite? 216.176.107.81 (talk) 18:38, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Safe hearing pf propellant
Talk:It's Only Time

message: Hi leutz, kann mir irgendjemand sagen wer die zweite stimme in dem lied "fool the world" ist? hört sich an wie fallout boy oder der sänger von panic! at the disco.
danke,
bruncky1993
--Bruncky1993 (talk) 19:39, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fool The World 
Talk:Any Questions?

message: I presume that Any Questions is broadcast live, unlike BBC1's Question Time.  If so then perhaps that can be noted in the article.--jmb (talk) 14:31, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Live

message: I seem to recall that in the early zeroes, this programme took a break in the summer (a bit like the programme In Our Time, presented by Melvyn Bragg, and was replaced by a programme called "Straw Poll". If any one can remember anything about this, it could go in the article. ACEOREVIVED (talk) 16:15, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Straw Poll

message: The article indicates that AQ? was carried on BBC Radio 1 in 1967-1970. I'm marking this as dubious, absent a citation. Prob should be Radio 4, but I haven't confirmed that yet. jxm (talk) 18:09, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: It's true that Any Questions? was broadcast on the BBC Radio 1 frequency from 6 September 1967 to 3 April 1970 – but only because at that time Radio 1 relayed Radio 2's programmes between 19.30 and 22.00 on Fridays, and the live edition of Any Questions? was a Light Programme / Radio 2 production between 22 September 1950 and 3 April 1970. -- Picapica (talk) 14:41, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Radio 1 unlikely 

message: A number of recent revisions in 2019 seem to have lost the early history of the programme and reference to Frank Gillard who was instrumental in starting the programme. Plus more details of past presenters lost (although it is summarised in the infobox). I'll attempt some edits to add this back in under a History heading. --RadioJottings (talk) 15:48, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. A somewhat sparse and disappointing article on the programme. Notable editions? What about that infamous  Gerald Nabarro episode in 1963? And no mention of the famous 1956 episode - Freddie Grisewood vs The Panel - at the time of Suez? Also, was it not derived from a US programme of the 1940s? I thought I saw this mentioned in a previous version of this article.CatNip48 (talk) 09:52, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Programme history

message: Do we need the locations list?
What is tthe criteria for including a location?
217.140.106.53 (talk) 12:24, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Locations 

message: Should we add a reference to the parody / homage Does the Team Think?
217.140.106.53 (talk) 12:25, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does the team think
Talk:Centenario Stadium

message: I disagree with the name change this article has recently suffered. I'd rather keep it under Estadio Centenario or Centenario Stadium. Translating the name is just not right in this case (unless I'm just wrong and that famous building is called "Edificio Estado Imperial" after all). Jordevi 21:10, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name change

message: It is stated in the article (as of 2007/01/17) that the Estadio Centenario is the home stadium of Penarol football club, one of the two uruguayan "big teams", the other being club Nacional de football.
I have 4 comments about that:
1.
Being a uruguayan football fan, i can state that this is a huge mistake.  The Estadio Centenario is not the home stadium of any team.  The stadium is owned by the municipality, and is used for almost every major football match that takes place in Uruguay.
2.
The Estadio Centenario could only be said to be home stadium of the Uruguay national football team.  All international matches featuring the national team are held in this stadium.
3.
The referenced uruguayan football team is not named Penarol, but Peñarol.
4.
After the demolition of the Estadio Pocitos, which was indeed its home stadium, Peñarol has never had a home stadium.  Peñarol has got training facilities with football fields called Los Aromos, but no official matches are played there.
Comments 1 and 2 reference (as of 2007/01/17) http://www.auf.org.uy/institucional-charrua.aspx and http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Estadio_Centenario.
greetings,
FullWindsor 03:55, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  the Estadio Centenario as a home stadium
Talk:Jantar Mantar

message: Isn't Jantar Mantar a more appropriate title, as it is the name by which everyone knows the observatory? (How many people would search for "Yantra Mandir"?) Moreover, on the web one finds both "Yantra Mandir" and "Yantra Mantra" as the supposed original names. Which is correct? Mahoka 09:24, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Jantar Mantar is the most used name. I think it should be moved there (request can be done on Wikipedia:Requested_moves#Uncontroversial_proposals. This also counts for the Delhi Jantar Mantar.  Wiki-uk 05:21, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  The correct name is Jantar Mantar, in which Mantar derives from the Sanskrit Mantra and has nothing to do with Mandir. Somebody please get these names change back. deeptrivia (talk) 21:55, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Title of this Page

message: Note:  Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 04:07, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Delhi Addition 

message: To whom it may concern: The two photos are too large. I cannot change it (I'm a dummy in this).--CarstenH (talk) 16:31, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I've made the photos smaller, but I don't vouch for the content of the page. I haven't even read it properly. Shreevatsa (talk) 10:13, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos are too large 

message: It is stated:
* ...the Jantar Mantar at Mathura was torn down just before the revolt of 1857...
Does anyone know the circumstances that led to the demolition? Who did it and why? Was there opposition to the demolition?
Enquire (talk) 17:34, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jantar Mantar at Mathura
File talk:Radian-common.png

message: Yes, all the angles are correct. --Salix alba (talk) 20:56, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. It's all elementary but it's very easy to make a mistake in such. John Reid 21:15, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

text: Uploaded a version with beefed-up edges and labels, for better scaling. John Reid 21:49, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Drell–Yan process

message: The equation here needs some explanation. What doe in sigma_pd, what do the p and d stand for? What is x-longitudinal momentum fraction? And what does the bar over the u and d represent? It should be explained that these are parton distribution functions and it would help if the pdf page had a similar notation.  I'm a particle physics graduate student; if this equation is confusing to me it's probably confusing to most users. Pulu (talk) 15:59, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Quark Flavor Asymmetry
Talk:Marlin (Finding Nemo)

message: I think this article would be better suited in a character list on the Finding Nemo page mostly because I can't find any articles linked to this one.
Mientkiewicz5508 21:01, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree; the only one seems to be Dory (Finding Nemo), which itself seems unnecessary. Titanium Dragon 20:25, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

text: Agree.  In fact, the Dory reference should also be merged.  --Snicker|¥°€| 20:22, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Added and updated mergeto tags for both articles.--Snicker|¥°€| 20:44, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge To Finding Nemo

message: This article has been merged with Finding Nemo and should not be reverted.  Please direct all discussion there.--Snicker|¥°€| 05:35, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Merged