lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:4Ever Hilary

message: I don't think this album exist at all. There's no official information about it, you can't buy it anywhere and you won't find any fan with this cd. I think that we should to delete this article.
It does exist in Italy..I've seen it maaany times in maaany shops!!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.101.126.217 (talk) 17:58, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: i have check billboard italy and duff offcial website! its not real people!!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hazzleboi (talk • contribs) 07:06, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  not real 

message: I see no purpose behind having separate articles for the DVD and the CD. I suggest that they be merged into the CD page as it is better sourced. The DVD can be a subsection of this. Rlholden (talk) 13:47, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: – Agreed. ℥nding·start 14:40, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging video and CD
Talk:Chris Mullin

message: Could use a smaller photo, this one's a little large. --Fitly 22:30, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo? 

message: No mention of his trademark flat-top? He has always had this unique style.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.49.155.106 (talk) 16:58, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trademark haircut 

message: In this article about White NBA players, Michael Wilbon writes about Chris Mullin, "Chris Mullin, the five-time NBA all-star and Dream Teamer who is now general manager of the Golden State Warriors, studied the moves of black stars Walt Frazier and Earl Monroe while growing up watching the 1970s Knicks. But he wore John Havlicek's No. 17 and looked up to Larry Bird." I think given this it is fair to say he looked up to Larry Bird and wore Havilicek's number because the three shared a common racial background.--TM 14:00, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, that's quite an assumption to make. Perhaps Mullin looked up to Bird because they had similar athletic "gifts". The only clear racial overtones are the ones provided by you.172.190.20.145 (talk) 00:20, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Not an assumption at all. Those are the words of well known basketballl commentator Michael Wilbon, not myself. Wilbon contrasts "black stars" Frazier and Monroe with white players that Mullin idolized in Bird and Havilcek.--TM 02:18, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Racial overtones" 
Talk:Clunia

message: This appears to be almost entirely a paper of some sort, anonymously contributed. I'm hoping (but not certain) that the anon who submitted it is, indeed the person who wrote it (impossible to make an educated guess, because there are no other edits from that IP address, so nothing to compare to). Utterly not in Wikipedia style, has POV issues, not wikified, etc. - Jmabel | Talk 22:31, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup needed
Talk:Affirmed

message: This is a great page on a wonderful horse.  The only thing that bothered me about it was this statement: "His trainer, Laz Barrera, once said: "Affirmed is greater than Secretariat, or any Triple Crown winner, because only Affirmed had to face Alydar."  Affirmed and Alydar had a great rivalry and were very closely matched.  Barrera may have made the statement but it does not do justice to the great rivalry between Secretariat and Sham.  Going into the Kentucky Derby, Sham had already beaten Secretariat  in the Santa Anita Derby and was considered the favorite to win the Kentucky Derby.  Sham ran the Kentucky Derby very quickly (even though he busted some teeth out on the starting gate), faster than Affirmed and Alydar (probably the second fastest Derby time ever).  Sham also ran a very close second in the Preakness but had a disappointing Belmont Stakes run.  Sham suffered an fracture after the Belmont Stakes and never raced again. RonCram (talk) 14:30, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Article does not do justice to the great rivalry between Secretariat and Sham
Talk:Alydar

message: This phrase from the opening paragraph doesn't really work. How could the feat have been "repeated before". I'm going to change it to something like "not equaled..." or "a unique feat" unless anyone objects. Off the top of my head I think that it's happened at least a couple of times in the English Triple Crown (Ravensbury in 1893?), but that's another story. Poor old Alydar went through enough without suffering from bad grammar! Tigerboy1966 (talk) 09:45, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  a feat not repeated before or since. 

message: I find this:
>About five days before Alydar's injury his original night watchman, Harold "Cowboy" Kipp, testified that he was at work on the farm when he was ordered to take Tuesday, November 13 off.[5]
Is the following more accurate?  The above suggests that Kipp's testimony was given about 5 days before Alydar's injury.
>Alydar's original night watchman, Harold "Cowboy" Kipp, testified that he was at work on the farm about five days before Alydar's injury when he was ordered to take Tuesday, November 13 off.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.63.16.47 (talk) 20:45, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  what was intended? 
Talk:Busy Bee

message: How would the common phrase "busy bee" be categorized as a part of speech? Shouldn't this be linked in the article? It's what I came here to find out. 74.102.132.46 (talk) 03:38, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Then you would be in need of a dictionary. For instance Wiktionary:busy bee. Arsenikk (talk) 21:11, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phrase 

message: There is aviation company in the Democratic Republic of Congo called Busy Bee. I don't know that this company has any kind of relations with the Norwegian company, but the name is the same. For example ther is some news about it: .--Porbóllett (talk) 15:37, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Busy Bee in DR Congo
Talk:HX convoys

message: I've added a couple; I've also shortened the HX.84 entry, as the detail I've taken out is on that page, and it's linked already. 
I've left the entry on HX.106, but it hardly seems notable; What does anyone else think? Xyl 54 08:10, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Best-known battles

message: B class. I made a few small edits, but here are 3 issues I cannot fix. Please look into them. Djmaschek (talk) 00:19, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The Atlantic map has a dot at 0°N 25°W, which is between Brazil and West Africa. I suggest putting the dot either at Halifax or else in the North Atlantic between Halifax and UK. Djmaschek (talk) 00:35, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

text: No, I have amended the title of the table to make it clearer. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 00:44, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks for that; I copy a table from earlier stuff and change the contents but clearly you know what you're doing with the structure. Is there a how to.... anywhere that you could point me towards? Thanks Keith-264 (talk) 10:23, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  Help:Table is my first go to. (Hohum @) 00:19, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks for fixing the three items I listed. Djmaschek (talk) 03:42, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  Apols for forgetting the ticks. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 08:27, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: B class review
Talk:Bold Ruler

message: One Grand Onyx, a TB, QH, paint cross has numerous champion racehorses in his bloodline such as: nearco, bold ruler, secretariat, Northern Dancer, and Nasrullah.  So he is out of a line of champions.  So nearco played a big part in his bloodline.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.215.84.2 (talk) 03:13, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Nearco

message: Bold Ruler was an outstanding sire, no doubt about it, but none of his sons and none of grandsons was a convincing sire. As stated later in the article his sire line almost died out in the 1980s. It was his great-great-grandson A.P.Indy, who saved his sire line, and he was indeed quite a good sire of sires, but Bold Ruler was not. Kassandro (talk) 23:29, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bold Ruler outstanding sire of sires?
Talk:Buckpasser

message: I saw Buckpasser in the paddock at Arlington before he set the world record for a mile.  It was a hot day, and Buckpasser was foaming at the mouth.  I thought, "How is this horse ever going to compete?"  It looked like he had just finished a race.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.30.83.3 (talk) 17:43, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Convoy HX 84

message: I've put some references in for this article, so I've removed the tag. Xyl 54 11:35, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Tag

message: Changed the name of one of the combatants to Germany.  "Nazi Germany" never existed as an official name.
--Vosselmans 10:26, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor edit 

message: I've started a talk thread on HMS Jervis Bay to try to reconcile the differences between it, this thread, and Edward Fegen. Narky Blert (talk) 01:18, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Inconsistencies

message: In this article the Beaverford engaged the Admiral Scheer.
In the Jervis bay page it did not.
"But the account published after the war by the captain of Admiral Scheer, and the timings of the sinking, show that there was no such engagement."
Anyone have the answer here?  This inconsistancy is frustrating.
82.9.104.192 (talk) 09:05, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: No such thing. B went down quickly, that´s all. 2A00:20:D003:28F7:651A:CD35:F2CC:8B54 (talk) 17:53, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did the Beaverford fight?
Talk:Distorted Humor

message: I am going to trim the list of progeny. DH is becoming a major sire and it's better to focus on his big winners.  Tigerboy1966  18:59, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Trimming
Talk:Exterminator (horse)

message: If anyone has read the Eva Jolene Boyd book on Exterminator [Thoroughbred Legends #18 ] she took great pains to research all the races he started. Her book asserts that he infact only started in 99 races not the 100 popularized in error. The Daily Racing Form ("DRF") which has kept meticulous records - does not have evidence to support 100 starts. Per her book he ran in an exhibition alone in September 1922 at Hawthorne Race Course (Illinois) - but was not given credit and in fact is dinged with an "unplaced" element on his record.
Per the Boyd book the DRF after review of the evidence will now officially list 99 starts for Exterminator and leave the 50-17-17 as-is
Accordingly shouldn't this be updated in his records? --Kellsboro Jack 20:30, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, not until it is recognized by most of the sources. If only one person has done significant research, and it isn't widely popularized, then it will have to wait. I have changed it accordingly. IPchangesthe box 00:00, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: And it is arguable that that race does, in fact, count. More research should be done on this. IPchangesthe box 00:01, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hold on, there is no book with that ISBN! IPchangesthe box 20:40, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Race Starts
Talk:Flower Alley

message: I think we should have the list of races this horse raced in and its finish. The fact that another horse won might be useful, but the comment that they squeaked out the win over another horse isn't for this Wikipedia article. That statement is useful for the article of the race itself, and the two other horses. Of course, this is my own opinion. Figgie123 12:52, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whitney 

message: * I added an infobox, and a race history table. Also broke out his 2005 history. What do you think? (Reformatted Flower Alley Page) Figgie123 17:16, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reformat
Talk:Kayak II (horse)

message: I removed the error on this page as part of rewrite and insertion of an infobox:
"Kayak II's career earnings totaled $457,730, which was a world record at the time. "
The earnings referred to are that of Seabiscuit, not Kayak II.
Handicapper 14:35, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Kelso (horse)

message: I am seeing:
"Kelso's three-year-old season began after the Triple Crown races of 1960 were run."
Please explain this.  Do some horses go through 3-year-old season out of synch with the Triple Crown races?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.63.16.47 (talk) 18:57, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can someone explain start of 3-year-old season?
Talk:Lexington (horse)

message: Jarret is mentioned only once in this wiki article with no explanation as to who he is or what his relationship to the horse is.
In Geraldine Brooks' book, "Horse", he is described as the son of the former slave and horse trainer Harry Lewis, but the son continues through the story as a slave.
Most of the Brooks book is built on solid fact and real people, but I don't know if "Jarret" was a real person or the fictional thread that ties the book together, so I'm hesitant to say more about him. 
However, that one mention of Jarret under the heading "Racing Record" is not explained or linked to any other information so it would confusing to someone who had not read the Brooks book. Amaling (talk) 18:59, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jarret
Talk:Prince Ludwig of Bavaria (b.1982)

message: I'm pretty sure the events described in this article did not happen in the 1980's.
: I'm not sure what events are being referred to in the above comment.  Ludwig was only born in 1982, so obviously things in his life occurred after that date. Noel S McFerran 01:00, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: User Surtsicna has blanked this article with the justification "no indication of notability and, more importantly, no sources whatsoever in a BLP".  This is patently untrue: (1) There are two sources given in the article which meet WP's criteria, and countless more could easily be added by anyone who takes the time to do so, because
(2) The Prince is likely to become the head of the house of Wittelsbach and the Jacobite succession to the throne of England.  This is practically the definition of notability! (Surely as a general rule anyone born with "His Royal Highness" in front of his name by definition is de facto notable, no?  All the more so if he be an heir apparent to a major royal family.) --145.226.30.44 (talk) 09:13, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: As far as I can extremely unlikely to become the Jacobite heir; more than 150 people would have to die for that to happen. He is also not heir apparent to the headship of the House of Wittelsbach (see heir apparent). Whether his position as 4th in line to the Bavarian throne makes him notable is debatable, but being styled as a Royal Highness is certainly no indication of notability. Would you concur that the 4-year-old Archduke Johannes Maria is notable because he is an Imperial and Royal Highness? Surtsicna (talk) 12:12, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page blanking
Talk:Gizmo Williams

message: Henry Williams (football player) → Gizmo Williams – Keeping with Wikipedia:Naming conventions (common names) (More commonly known as Gizmo Williams than Henry Williams by CFL fans)
===Survey===
:Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
*Support per WP:NAME. --Dhartung | Talk 07:35, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Add any additional comments
This article has been renamed as the result of a move request.
Vegaswikian 06:00, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: :Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
*Support per WP:NAME. --Dhartung | Talk 07:35, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: :Add any additional comments
This article has been renamed as the result of a move request.
Vegaswikian 06:00, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Talk:Genesis (Star Trek: The Next Generation)

message: *I took out the following trivia.
**In this episode Spot is pregnant, however in the seventh series episode Phantasms Data says, "And he will require water. And you must provide him with a sandbox. And you must talk to him. Tell him he is a pretty cat, and a good cat, and--" This clearly shows that Spot is male.
*The reason I took it out was because Data did not find out out that Spot was female until the episode Force of Nature, three episodes later.  -- Grev 15:22, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spot Trivia 

message: So Troi is no longer human, how is this incorrect? Alastairward 12:57, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't add that line, but I'm assuming it was based on the idea that she was never human to begin with. Koweja 13:17, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, how does that explain Barclay, who is by all outward signs human, regressing into a spider? -- Grev 07:27, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Troi Trivia 

message: I merged most of the trivia into the main article. I deleted the part about Barclay-Spider because it was explained, albeit in a very confusing manner. 
And since some people seem to be confused, Troi is half-human and half-alien. Lots42 03:27, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia Changes 

message: Just as a general response to all of the above:  It doesn't matter who is what species before the de-evolution.  No, humans don't share an ancestor with spiders (or marmosets, or frogs, or whatever) lately enough to carry and recognizable introns.
However, as shwon by the fact that each person, regardless of being the same species, regressed to efefctively random forms, I'd say it was some generic thing that just changed people into animalistic forms.  There's no reason to look for genetic history or accuracy.
--12.21.161.34 (talk) 16:45, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistent De-evolution 

message: Is the title of the episode really referencing the bible. Genesis is also a scientific term. The footnote and it's link do not actually confirm the text. 86.135.17.92 (talk) 04:47, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:Ian "Rocky" Butler

message: :The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was no consensus. -- tariqabjotu (joturner) 22:13, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
*Weak oppose. I'd support a move to Ian Butler (CFL player), his proper name. Just as with my view in the Ian Meldrum survey. – Axman (☏) 11:02, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Omaha (horse)

message: The citation regarding the horse's location is in error.  The University of Nebraska at Omaha does not have a culinary arts major, nor is there a building with that name, hence giving any bad cooking to Omaha is not possible.  This appears to be an urban myth that is being perpetuated through horse circles, but is simply not true.  The only buildings affiliated with UNO on the former Ak-Sar-Ben property include the Peter Kiewit Institute, home of the College of Information Science and Technology (UNO) and the College of Engineering (UNL) Mammel Hall (UNO College of Business Administration) and Scott Hall, Scott Village and Scott Court, all student residential housing.  No one seems to know where, or if, the horse was ever buried there.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Midwest mimi (talk • contribs) 13:07, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The whole issue of Omaha's retirement needs looking at, lots of nice-sounding, but compeletly unreferenced material. The offending sections were the work of User:68.13.65.252 who m.o. was to add lots of colourful, unencyclopedic material to articles across a wide range of topics, often with Nebraska connections. Most of his/her contributions were quickly reverted. I'm expanding the article at the moment, so I'll look into it.  Tigerboy1966  09:22, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Urban myth

message: Badly needs more details on American racing career.  Tigerboy1966  07:04, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion
Talk:Pan Zareta

message: Hm... Just to let folks know. The Shiloh Jr in Pan Zareta's pedigree is a Quarter Horse, son of Shiloh and out of Old Puss by Freedom by *Emancipation. See Robert Denhardt Foundation Sires of the American Quarter Horse page 195-196 and American Stud Book Volume VII page 1226. The Haleys and the Newmans bred both Quarter horses (although they weren't called that back then) and Thoroughbreds. Ealdgyth 01:40, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I plan to go through and add inline citations to most of the information in the article, so it'll get added when I do that (probably within the next few days.) Thanks muchly for the tone cleanup, it's much better. And welcome to Wikipedia! Ealdgyth - Talk 17:46, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Point Given

message: "He was subsequently syndicated for $50 million," ???? --AW (talk) 19:41, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Anyone? --AW (talk) 22:48, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It means that the horse was sold in shares. Usually there are about 40 shares. The owners sell the shares at, in this case $1.25m each. They would probably keep some shares back for themselves. It's a way spreading the risk. Tigerboy1966 (talk) 19:34, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does syndicated mean?
Talk:Real Quiet

message: Youtube has ABC Sports broadcast of 1998 Belmont Stakes, and I am hearing Real Quiet may have been disqualified and placed 2nd had he finished 1st.  He lost by a nose but was not disqualified.  He had bumped Victory Gallop, the eventual winner, as I hear.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.63.16.47 (talk) 21:27, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  might have been disqualified in Belmont?