lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hypnos (short story)

message: It is enough to read other Lovecraft's stories to know that. The only 'confusing' part here might be: "Much of his work was influenced by his own dreams".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aseneath (talk • contribs) 
:Oh?  But not everyone has read the other stories, so how would other people know that without a source?  Also, who's to say someone else doesn't have a different interpretation of Lovecraft's works?  Metros232 17:53, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  sources
Talk:Archicad

message: The "IFC" link is incorrect. It points to the International Financial Corporation and not the Industry Foundation Classes (IFC) from the Alliance for Interoperability (IAI). – It is correct now.Chris81w (talk) 20:44, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: IFC

message: Can anyone cite the source about ArchiCAD 11? The newest version in 2007 isn't ArchiCAD 10? :S
--190.40.99.35 05:42, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  ArchiCAD 11!? 
Talk:Jacques Collin de Plancy

message: The bibliography was taken from the one of the French wikipedia written by  Semnoz. Apologies in advance for any mistakes in the translation. -- Shimirel (Talk) 16:30, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Clarke MacArthur

message: MacArthur is a left winger, not a centre.
Sources:
http://www.hockeydb.com/ihdb/stats/pdisplay.php?pid=69005
http://www.nhl.com/ice/player.htm?id=8470667
http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/teams/players/bio/?id=3565
...and watching him play since he was on Team Canada in 2005.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.163.233.206 (talk) 17:37, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  He's a left winger
Talk:Equipment of the Polish Army

message: Unreferenced tag is not enough to justify removal of content, unless the content is controversial. The article is unreferenced, so are - unfortunately - thousands of others across the project. We are not, without a good a good reason, in the business of blanking/deleting them. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  17:52, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: On tags and removal of content
Talk:Greater Poland uprising (1806)

message: This article is currently at start/C class, but could be improved to B-class if it had more (inline) citations. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 03:27, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: B-class review

message: While the Kingdom of Prussia already possessed large Polish population in Upper Silesia, it gained additional Polish citizens during the partitions of Poland. (HOW LARGE is LARGE, WHAT WAS THE PERCENTAGE, AND WHAT IS THE BASIS FOR WHAT IS 'POLISH', THAT IT IS SLAVIC SPEAKING, OR IS IT PRUSSIA's OWN DETERMINATION?) Polish language was abolished as official language and German introduced. (when?) Prussian ruler Frederick the Great who hated[8] and despised[9] Poles ( ALL 'POLES'? WHAT 'Poles'?) hoped to replace them with Germans (WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE OF WHAT HE HOPED TO DO?) Prussian officials who spread German language and culture (WHO? WHICH?) often (OFTEN ACCORDING TO WHOM? WEASEL WORD) despised Poles, who were portrayed as 'backward Slavs (HOW OFTEN? BY WHOM EXACTLY?).[7] Lands of Polish nobility were confiscated and given to German nobles.[7] (AT WHAT RATIO? ALL? 100 people?) German colonists were settled[7] (WHAT ABOUT THE OTHER COLONISTS?)
always these generalizations, always the same foreign sources talking about 'Germans' and 'Poles' in a time when not even the nobles thought of themselves as Poles - had they done so, then maybe they would not have allowed themselves to be bribed by foreigners and had invested in more than just protecting their grain trade. Maybe they would have invested in, ya know, Poland. And of course always this conclusion that policy towards the region just fell out of the sky, with no context whatsoever. Asdf12345sixseveneight (talk) 20:49, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Vague article with missing data and generalization
Talk:Hong Kong Fire Services Department

message: I created an article called List of Fire Stations in Hong Kong.  Could someone help me on it? - jlao 04 05:09, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: How should it be linked from this page? - jlao 04 06:12, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have just link the list to the page. I think you can better add the related reference to any page you created; this made the page looks better.  Shrimp wong 17:21, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Ok I'll do that. - jlao 04 02:07, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of Fire Stations 

message: I reverted this article to class C due to lack of WP:RS. Tavatar (talk) 18:30, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment
Talk:Royal Rumble (2000)

message: was this the first table match? if not what was? if it is then the article should say.--142.162.207.58 12:58, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know, but it can't be noted in the article unless there is a source that says it is the first (see WP:V). TJ Spyke 18:04, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

text: I honestly don't see it as all that notable. Maybe I guess. TJ Spyke 01:43, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know whether it's notable or not, I was just presenting the facts. I know WWF are always big on billing any show as the "First Ever [insert minor stipulation change] match" but I woulda thought ECDub would have done this match first so I don't know how notable it is from a neutral POV.Tony2Times (talk) 10:53, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There was no point in ECW since tables (and everything else) was legal in every match anyways and had been used many times in matches. I put it in the notes section, the same way we mention the ladder match at WrestleMania X. TJ Spyke 17:47, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  the tables match 

message: I could be wrong, but I don't remember the episode of Sunday Night Heat prior to the 2000 Rumble having any matches.  I lloked for the matches that are listed and I found this video of the episode:  http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x14qxv1_wwf-heat-01-23-2000_sport  However, if this is that episode, then there's no way that it aired live right before the PPV, because hey're using the SmackDown! stage and Ovaltron, and the announcers keep saying that the PPV event will be in a few hours.  Plus, this short report of Heat doesn't list any matches:  http://www.pwwew.net/tv/heat/000123.htm
I'm assuming that the matches that are listed in the article aired as part of an international broadcast of Heat, so I don't know if they should be included here.  Any comments/decisions on this issue from more experienced editors for PPV articles would be useful.  --Andresg770 (talk) 02:32, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heat matches? 

message: Re-embedded AE link in date in lede, after this link was removed/reverted w/o explanation, and no discussion on Talk page. 130.45.24.168 (talk) 08:06, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello. The link is not useful. While the event took place during the attitude era, I don't see why a link with the date helps. The Attitude Era just mention the event once. I don't see this edition on other articles, like films of the Silent Era or TV Series of the Golden Age. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 10:38, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  AE Lede Date Link
Talk:Royal Rumble (2001)

message: Is it true that the WWE DVD release had no blurring of the WWF logos. --Whitmore 8621 (talk) 06:22, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: WWE-  DVD Version

message: Re-embedded AE link in date in lede, after this link was removed/reverted w/o explanation, and no discussion on Talk page. 130.45.24.168 (talk) 08:05, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  AE Lede Date Link
Talk:Kraków uprising

message: Related to Talk:Free City of Kraków#Requested move, please discuss there, no separate RM. -- Matthead discuß!     O       16:24, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: This article is about a HISTORICAL EVENT in a HISTORICAL CITY, not the current city of Cracow! Historic naming applies. The content of the EB has been twisted as "evidence" for Krakow and even an administrator is saying to move Krakow first! Ridiculous! The proper name of this article is either Republic of Cracow or Free City of Cracow... NOT the name that Piotrus has locked it into! Charles 06:28, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Let's discuss it at Talk:Free City of Kraków, since you double posted at both pages.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  06:30, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In case there is anyone watching this page and not that one (and what are the odds?), there is a move discussion at Talk:Free City of Kraków#Requested move; it should probably just be applied here, however it comes out. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 15:57, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cracow

message: Why should this article have two battle stubs? Battle of Cracow, Battle of Kraków, Battle of Krakau? -- Matthead discuß!     O       20:55, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Battle? 

message: Confirmed for WPPOLAND following a MILHIST review. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 00:42, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: B-class review

message: It should be obvious, but I wanted to note that this article should not discuss the Galician slaughter too much; that's what the dedicated article is for. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:52, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relation to [[Galician slaughter]] 

message: There seems to be a problem with some of the dates given in this article.  According to the article he uprising began on the 20th of February, and is apparently over by the time of the battle of Glodice on the 26th of February. Yet the article also says "On 27 September a struggle for power developed, and Wiszniewski, after a failed attempt to take power, was exiled by Tyssowski and Dembowski within a matter of hours." sounds like the uprising was still going as late as late September.  Yet Wandycz 1975, in the work cited in this article, places the end of the uprising as 4 March 1846 when Dembrowski was killed.  TwelveGreat (talk) 14:33, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates 

message: Strange, in view of the debate above, that ngram viewer has roughly equal hits for Cracow uprising, Cracow Uprising and Krakow uprising, but the title of this article doesn't register at all. Just saying. Bermicourt (talk) 21:23, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cracow vs. Kraków
Talk:Polish–Soviet War in 1919

message: This is an obsolete import from the Polish-Soviet War. Should it it simply redirected to the main article? Renata (talk) 03:58, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It contains some info that is not in the main article. It is a result of the bizarre argument that was forced through the FAC that the main article was too large and needed to be shortened. Unless you want to copyedit and reference article here that is not in the main, I suggest leaving this in peace until somebody wants to go through all that trouble.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  05:47, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect?
Talk:Polish–Soviet War in 1920

message: Please can someone who knows the subject improve the redlink Radziwiłłow?  Likely candidates are Radziwiłłów, Masovian Voivodeship and Radziwiłłów, Greater Poland Voivodeship, but perhaps it is a different town with a new Ukranian name. Certes (talk) 22:41, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which Radziwiłłow? 

message: Another Polish propaganda page on Wikipedia, the content of which barely squares up to everyone elses version of events. 2A00:23C4:B617:7D01:F8C5:76D7:BF01:FE82 (talk) 10:32, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Propaganda
Talk:Eidoloscope

message: As far as I know and are able to give evidence for, it was Eugène Augustin Lauste who actually designed the Eidoloscope. Lauste, french inventor especially of film sound devices later in London, England, worked with Edison under Dickson. Filmtechniker and 80.219.86.190 13:39, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Aftermath of the Polish–Soviet War

message: Someone needs to work on removing more lulz from the article and organizing it better. I've changed some stuff but right now it still looks like a piece written by a cold warrior/anti-communist crusader.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.246.121.195 (talk) 18:41, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  too many lulz 

message: A lot of these facts seem made up and POV. Any chanve this can be fixed?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.11.73.175 (talk) 15:46, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strong anti communist bias 
Talk:Battle of Zieleńce

message: The Russian General's name was Morkov, not Markov.--Alexvonf 14:30, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Confirm for WP:POLAND per prior MILHIST review. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:19, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: B-class review
Talk:Tent stitch

message: I have created this page to try and clear up some of the ambiguities regarding the various types of tent stitch. I am not a needlepointer so would welcome any input from someone more knowledgeable on whether I have got the terminology correct. I have researched various sources on the Internet and used a couple of stitch encyclopedias to try and clear up all the meanings of basketweave, continental, half cross and tent stitch as well as needlepoint stitch and petit point, all of which I found very confusing to start with! I hope this proves useful to the stitching community. Any comments or further discussion most welcome! --Velvet-Glove 17:04, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tent stitch article
Category talk:911

message: the 911 attacks were perpirtated by your own governing(bush) bodies and your multi corperate institutions.unfortunately so many,ie most of the united states,has such a short memory,cast your memoeries back to the illfated attempts of g.w.bush senior in the early 90's in his attempt to secure oil resources for your countries future.your all so willing to accept the theory the a radical muslim conducted these attacks.
was this guy actually working hand in hand with your government???
why hasnt this so called mad man not been found with all the advanced technology and billions of dollars thrown into his capture,what your military and all its resourses cant find a guy hiding in a cave? it doesnt make any sense.
its all to easy for a governing body to point the fingure at whom ever they need to to keep things off the publics radar.
the scope of what happened that day will never come to light,because there was so much more at stake!the buildings surrounding the twin towers that were also demolised housed some of the most sensitive imformation known to (some men)man.
there are so many descrponcies with your governments investigations into and precceding the event that even your down and out bums of the street have a better understsnding of what really happened and who was really responsible.you own cia blew up a bar in bali to get our government to go along with your stupid motion on a war on terrorism.f.f.s.blind freddy can work it out yet you yanks cant accept the fact that it was all perpitated by your own peolpe.
oil and its power to generate power over all sectors of society is at stake here nothing else.and you dont have it so they will steal it from wherevr they can,makes sense that they target the biggest deposits in the world...
take it out of the equation and what have you got.NOTHING..limited power to do limited things,its no wonder that nations of a perticular religion which holds no importance to what the western world sees as the be all to self existance has become the pawn in your greatest struggle which is self importance..
get a grip on yourselves.
who is god what is god what is a religous belief?????????bush's christian fundinetalists??
your all deluded by the multi nation companies that tell you via all forms of the media what is good and what is bad,you must have this and you cant believe in that..
wake up america you dont have a clue!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
--Jpb123 17:06, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Catherine Booth

message: very religious, specifically...let me guess...methodist? i think there is a bias here, i edited a bit, but it needs more. --andrew 17:06, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  biased 

message: Based on this individual being included in the Calendar of saints (Church of England), I am adding the :Category:Anglican saints and the Saints WikiProject banner to this article. I am awaiting reliable sources which can be used to add the content to the article. John Carter 16:42, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Saints banner and category

message: This article is extremely opinionated and is significantly lacking in factual evidence.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.112.172.189 (talk) 20:39, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Complete Rewrite
Talk:Vilcabamba, Peru

message: :Copied from actual article Markh 17:09, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Although my comments are late they need to be included to complete this discussion. The Vilcabamba of this article is the Inca town of the last four Inca emperors. Hiram Bingham also used the name Vilcapampa for this town, although he did not realize it was the final Inca town of the emperors (he incorrectly thought Machu Picchu was the last). The current name of the area is Espiritu Pampa. It has also been called Vilcabamba Viejo (the Old). A second location, in Peru, is also called Vilcabamba or Vilcabamba the New. It was build by the Spanish, not the Inca.  Dger (talk) 22:46, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: I'm not 100% sure that this is the Vilcabamba that is in the game, however the location on the games map seems to be in the Peru area. The map isn't charted though, and it seems pretty close to Ecuador, so my edit might belong in Vilcabamba, Ecuador. Just a heads up. DSMeatte 20:57, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Shadow Hearts: From the New World]] level 

message: I was curious as to why this is merged within the article that talks about the city itself. It should be split into two separate articles in truth. The city should have it's own article like how many ancient cities do while the part about the Incna govt. there should be another article in it's own right. That's just my two cents on this matter. Revulker (talk) 22:41, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Now Neo-Inca State is a separate article covering the state rather than the city. --Cartakes (talk) 23:19, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shouldn't "Inca Government in Vilcabamba" a separate article? 

message: Why the placeholder in the Inca remnant section? It seems like it's been there a while so whoever was going to expand it seems to have forgotten. If it's not going to be the citation should probably be moved to a Refideas tag in this talk page until someone who has that source can write something from it. --Jessietail (talk) 00:15, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: . You're right, notes like this don't belong in articles. I moved the reference to "Further reading", and replaced the note with an  template. —Ringbang (talk) 14:50, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  (to be expanded) 

message: Currently the template is "infobox settlement" but I suggest it'd be converted to "infobox ancient site" since they are ruins, not a recently abandoned city. Just like the article "Machu Picchu", this article should be changed to said template. Epinedo (talk) 05:16, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change infobox template to ancient site 

message: The above phrase makes not sense. It should be corrected. --Aciram (talk) 16:39, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: "Savoy found 50 or 60 houses and 300 houses at Espiritu Pampa"
Talk:Green certificate

message: Are Green Certificates used by member states to proof to the EU, they have x% of their electricity production from renewable resources?
How do the other member states proof that ? --SvenAERTS (talk) 16:36, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: Hey Whpq,
In Europe, nobody knows about green tags; certificate is the word. Check e.g. www.recs.org or www.aib-net.org. Also issuing processes and rules differ from what is described under Green Tags. Let's have separate spaces for and keep them linked to each other.
Regards,
M
----
I confirm and agree --SvenAERTS (talk) 11:44, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  tags vs. certificates 

message: In many trade language the word certificate relates to the origin. Sometimes the words combine. In the essential effort to bring green energy, or renewable energy to consumers, who want to distinguish in what they get in a free market, it does not matter what the name is. As long as the supply of the energy is just well accounted and securely booked to their - utility meter - related account. Bouwhuise (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 22:33, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  origin 
Talk:National Conservation Centre

message: It's possible that this page could be merged with Midland Railway Office page --NeilEvans 17:17, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope. SDImply put one is the building which is listed and has a history. The other is an organisation which happens to inhabit that building at the moment. Why do you think the two things are the same? SHould we merge royal family and Buck House.--84.9.194.116 19:15, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled