lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Historic house museum

message: There are no citations in this article and it reads like original research. Please see WP:OR. – Freechild (BoomCha) 23:20, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Original research

message: I have rated this article as Bad on the assessment scale. IvoShandor 10:53, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I will have to agree, this is a bad article.--Kranar drogin 10:57, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I am going to work on cleaning up the prose, and I'll add citations and information as I come across them. – Freechild (BoomCha) 23:32, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Roger that. I will be doing what I can as well. IvoShandor 01:03, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

text: What we really need are some good sources. But the current version is much better than what appeared here when I stumbled upon it. IvoShandor 06:24, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: Such as the Lower East Side Tenement National Historic Site, Merchant's House Museum, Kykuit, etc.dm 06:27, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  One way to improve would be to link to specific examples 

message: Hi  while your contribution of the photo is appreciated, it is important not to add to create photo clutter. Too many Wikipedia museum pages suffer from too many photos being added by people being boosters of their museum or country/province. It is important to think what does the photo contribute to the topic? What is it illustrating that other photos are not? Doe the photo to the diversity of the topic? Too many photos on museum pages are only from Europe or North America or certain countries or states/provinces. What is your rational for adding it? Meaning what does it add to the page that is current not illustrated? My concern is that the photo does not appear to add anything that is not already there. Also is from Scandinavia, is a photo of Kings Hall at Skokloster Castle, from Sweden. The photo does a good job of representing Castle/mansions. This is not a question of the importance of birthplace of Aleksis Kivi or any other place with a photo on the page, it is just about what does it add? May I suggest, this image :File:Aleksis Kiven koti.jpg which is an exterior of  Aleksis Kiven birthplace and shows the farmstead. The topic does not yet have a farmhouse and there are many farm house museums in existence. Myotus (talk) 01:28, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Contribution of photo
Talk:Seven Spirits of God

message: The Seven Spirits of God can also be thought to be the Sevenfold Redeeming Character of God reflected through Christ as we see in 2 Peter 1:5 -11. These seven fold characters are seen in the Spiritual body of Christ. They were manifested down through history in each of the seven Church Ages giving a peculiar manifestation to the Spiritual body of Christ in that age. 
Zaceriah Koshy: 12:50 pm.(Qatar).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zacmer (talk • contribs) 09:49, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: The seven Spirits are the seven highest angels serving in the Presence of God.  The sense is that they are seven Spirits of (as in belonging to, of God's Presence) God, not of (as in "of") God.  A similar sense is seen in the name "Israel" meaning "Prince of God", meaning a prince of God (of God's court), not a prince over God.
Gabriel told Zachariah that he is "Gabriel, who stands in the Presence of God".  Revelations also mentions seven Angels who blow the trumpets, and that they come out from the Temple of God in Heaven (they stand in the Presence of God).
I imagine the seven Spirits are like seven Viziers.
Archestrategos 10:51 A.M., August 29th 2009 (Jakarta)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The seven Spirits are fully described in Exodus already.
Garry Denke 23:30, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Is this a stub?

message: Read aloud 
Read the seven spirits of God allowed out loud 174.251.242.38 (talk) 12:13, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Read aloud to me the 7 spirit of God
Talk:2007–08 New York Islanders season

message: The current lines were part of the New York Islanders article, and then were removed. Arguably, they belong more on this page anyway. What does everyone think about adding the current lines here? Jonneroo (talk) 23:20, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Current Lines
Talk:2007–08 Toronto Maple Leafs season

message: Shouldn't the points in the individual game boxes match up with the points in the division boxes? I think it's an error in the OT calculations?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.159.46.64 (talk) 02:31, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Points??
Talk:Rotating biological contactor

message: The history section consists of a number of disconnected ideas/events which lack citation. As far as I can see this article may deserve another section (eg "Longevity Issues") which focuses on the problems currently discussed in the history section. As mentioned below the section may also be excessively promotional of Mr Findlay.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.252.138.213 (talk) 06:33, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: History Section Cleanup

message: In-line reference citations should be provided for each section, and preferably for each paragraph, to improve WikiProject Engineering quality classification.Thewellman (talk) 18:35, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Referencing
Talk:Yaki udon

message: Yakiudon, just like yakisoba(which the article also draws comparison to), is not typically made with soy sauce. Yakisoba, unlike other Asian fried noodles, is usually made with a Japanese variation of a Worcestershire sauce and this goes the same for Yakiudon. There are soy sauce versions of Yakiudon but not the most common type and this is also how it’s described in the Japanese article 2400:2411:9241:9900:E505:4A84:66B6:49C7 (talk) 02:25, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your input. Are you able to provide a reference to support your claim? Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 09:29, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  “Soy sauce based sauce”
Talk:Bière de Garde

message: A consensus has been reached on the beer style talk page to include the BJCP link.  If you believe it isn't right for the biere de garde article please discuss inadequacies here.  Do not simply revert edits please, your behavior is disruptive.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by RoyalIvey (talk • contribs) 18:06, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  BJCP
Talk:Valete

message: Please do not remove the prod template until notability is demonstrated and backed up with third party, relevant sources.  Note that blogspot and myspace are almost never acceptable sources under WP:CITE, and that no sources are needed for the discography section, as it is a simple, uncontested matter of fact.  MrZaiustalk 14:43, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, be aware that using phrases like "always versatile" "we can see" "his songs show" "making everyone see his lyrical talent" seriously weaken the article by straying from the tone expected of an encyclopedia article.  See WP:TONE for more details. MrZaiustalk 14:45, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Striking the last.fm source - It's user editable, and therefore non-verifiable and non-English.  Again, please see WP:CITE. MrZaiustalk 16:25, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

text: As I read WP:EL, the Portuguese last.fm link isn't even permissible as extlink. Reverted. MrZaiustalk 17:37, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability & encyclopedic tone

message: Just thought anyone who was interested might like to know that the image used in this article will be deleted in five days time as a result of lacking any copyright information.  It looks most likely to have been a grab from Google.  The Rambling Man 19:02, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Image
Wikipedia talk:Crash Course in Wikipedianism

message: Just one comment.  Isn't the following text: "acquiring an education (that is, attaining knowledge) is a fundamental right of every person" pretty unobjective?  I know this is a user page, but this strikes me as political/ideological statement rather than helpful advice --- or rather a political/ideological statement thrown into the midst of some advice.  One can believe that contributing to the project is valuable without subscribing to the notion that education is a fundamental right.  Novaseeker 00:25, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm just glad the essay tag is there, now that it's in the Wikipedia: namespace and not in userspace. -- OlEnglish (Talk) 18:14, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
Talk:List of birds of the Philippines

message: The Miangas Island of the Nanusa Group, where the Red-and-blue Lory (Eos histrio challengeri) is endemic, is politically still a part of Indonesia. Michaelamanuba 00:27, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Miangas Island

message: http://books.google.com/books?id=irVjEgh-8WkC&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=irVjEgh-8WkC&pg=PA5&dq=1936+1941+Lanao&hl=en&sa=X&ei=PsJCU7TZDsKU0AHI_4CABQ&ved=0CF8Q6AEwCA#v=onepage&q=1936%201941%20Lanao&f=false
Rajmaan (talk) 02:52, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notes on Philippine Birds: Notulae Naturae of The Acad. of Natural Sciences of Phila., No. 303 By Rodolphe Meyer de Schauensee  

message: What does UNC mean? It is used in the Herons section and is not defined anywhere in the article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.201.128.86 (talk) 17:22, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Excellent question. It was added in 2013 by an unregistered editor from Denmark who only edited this article. I can't find anything that it might mean. I'll go ahead and take it out and if there's a good reason for it, we can add it back later. Thanks for paying attention and bringing it up.  SchreiberBike | ⌨  19:11, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

text: Further thought. It was added with this edit along with other codes that might be abbreviations for conservation statuses, and might stand for unconcerned or unclassified (just guesses).  SchreiberBike | ⌨  19:15, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: My guess is that they were abundance levels (Uncommon, Fairly Common, Least Common, Common, Rare). Loopy30 (talk) 23:55, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: That's great then. Wouldn't it be better to keep it and even add them to the other lists? I would love to know which species are common and rare.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.201.129.73 (talk) 13:25, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: UNC?
Talk:John McGarvie

message: Was he ordained in Scotland (and if so, by which denomination) or in Australia? Alekksandr (talk) 21:16, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Answering my own question - the Fasti Ecclesiæ Scoticanæ of the Church of Scotland says that he was ordained in Glasgow. Alekksandr (talk) 20:50, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Denominational affiliation
Talk:Kevin Shattenkirk

message: This page has been vandalized frequently since the Free Agent period started.
Citing personal opinions such as he "proudly plays" or making derogatory remarks about the Rangers such as Raggers. Deltadawg469 (talk) 19:18, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The page has been listed at Wikipedia:Requests for Page Protection and will be semi-protected as soon as the admin backlog there is cleared. Kosack (talk) 19:20, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Frequent Vandalism  
Talk:Multibanco

message: MBNet has been replaced and extended by MBWay, which also allows instant inter-bank transfers and paying at a retailer via a one-time code sent to the app (used in self-checkout machines in some supermarkets).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:818:DE6D:6900:8AD7:F6FF:FEC3:CCC6 (talk) 18:41, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Talk:Times Higher Education–QS World University Rankings

message: THE-QS ranking is now renamed to the "QS World University Rankings". Everything is the same in the QS ranking, data, methology, etc. THE has created a brand new ranking of their own with Thomas Reuters, called the "Times Higher Education World University Rankings". THE does not own the old data to the QS ranking. If this page is too confusing as a dab, perhaps it should simple redirect to QS. THE-QS is not a separate ranking from QS. It is the QS, with only a name change, and has been moved as appropriate. CrazyPaco (talk) 18:48, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: This is a [[Wikipedia:Disambiguation|disambiguating]] page, not an article
Talk:Digswell

message: I don't think the average age in Digswell is 100. David Blandford 01:07, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lily (Kappa Mikey)

message: VANDAL ALERT!!
Someone put in the "Possible Future" section that Lily would go to hell.  This is beyond inappropriate for Wikipedia, especially a Kappa Mikey article.  I deleted this as soon as I saw this, so watch out for this vandal in the future.  Regards, Spottedstripe 01:08, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Gavril Olteanu

message: I'm waiting for the ILL request to come through for this book:
:
-- MarcoTolo 01:13, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible additional source
Talk:Patrick Willis (judge)

message: The lead says, "his rulings were frequent sources of news stories", but the article doesn't give information about what these rulings were. Tyrenius 01:28, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: His rulings

message: SHAME ON THIS JUDGE AND EVERYONE CORRUPT INVOLVED. PEOPLE LIKE HIM GIVE THE JUST SYSTEM A BAD NAME!!! 2601:202:8001:2350:E501:8667:A8FB:99B0 (talk) 22:13, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Steve Avery Brenden Dassey
Talk:A&A

message: Are you sure A&A is a three-letter abbreviation? WinterSpw 01:29, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No. — Ian Lee  (Talk) 01:46, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think it's a three-letter abbreviation. "&" is certainly not a letter. WinterSpw 16:21, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Change it then... WP:BOLD — Ian Lee  (Talk) 01:41, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:1951 New York Yankees season

message: Here is a link to a 1951 picture of Ted Williams, Joe DiMaggio, and Mickey Mantle taken 4/17/1951 it would be great for this article. http://espn.go.com/newyork/photos/gallery/_/id/9046555/image/6/april-17-1951-yankees-top-20-opening-day-moments If someone could upload it not sure about copyright info on it but it says who took it and where it came from at the link also. Theworm777 (talk) 22:20, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  1951 Picture
Talk:1957 New York Yankees season

message: It is really irritating to have to type:
New York Yankees, 
note [1957 New York Yankees season|New York Yankees], 
and Milwaukee Braves,  
note [1957 Milwaukee Braves season|Milwaukee Braves],
when New York Yankees, 
and Milwaukee Braves ought to work.
This is just clumsy and aggravating.
98.81.1.45 (talk) 15:31, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Difficulties with the Wikipedia
Talk:Ian Cole

message: He's been suspended pending an investigation for sexual misconduct involving a child. Not sure if anyone wants to edit this. https://www.wtsp.com/article/sports/nhl/lightning/lightning-defenseman-ian-cole-suspended-allegations/67-aca9eff5-0fec-48c0-af7a-8faa2594f778 
--69.112.6.31 (talk) 01:44, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hello, I'd like to ask that the sexual abuse allegations, posted anonymously on Twitter in October 2022, be removed from the "Tampa Bay Lightning" sub-section of the article, as they were deemed unfounded less than one week later following an investigation.  No other notable people were involved and press coverage was rather routine, so I believe this content falls under WP:NOTGOSSIP and WP:BALASP.
Thanks for your time, Kevinmags27 (talk) 05:45, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done:  Declined on notability grounds, although the sentence in question needs an update to include the investigation's outcome. Quetstar (talk) 22:38, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

text: *Hi  and thanks for the ping. However, it would be more appropriate to discuss this with Quetstar personally. I agree with  for a couple of reasons. Just because others do it, doesn't mean we have to. Personally, when I am deciding whether to include controversial information I think about whether it will matter in a few years and/or leave blanks in the article. For example, I am always for including suspensions because it leaves a gap in games played. However, I do not like including every single fight a player engages in because it does not matter in the long run. As Cole was suspended and it thus impacted his play, I think it is important to leave in. I believe it would be detrimental actually to leave this out.HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 20:27, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsubstantiated allegations
Talk:1970 New York Yankees season

message: "Yankees had the lowest payroll in MLB from 1943 till 1993" could not possibly be true.  That statement not only lacks a citation but also defies credulity.  I grew up a Yankees fan, and there is no way that the Yankees had the lowest payroll in MLB when they won two world series in the seventies with high priced free agents Catfish Hunter and Reggie Jackson and the Yankees penchant for hired guns.  I could believe that the "Yankees had the HIGHEST payroll in MLB from 1943 till 1993"" without a citation, but citations are standard for encyclopedias.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.50.245.48 (talk) 19:43, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Talk:1973 New York Yankees season

message: This Wiki states that Bobby Murcer was the 2nd Yankee, after Mickey Mantle, to have a base salary of at least $100,000.  I believe that Joe DiMaggio's base salary for 1949 and 1950 was also $100,000 Tomada36 (talk) 15:46, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bobby Murcer's $100,000 salary
Talk:1996 New York Yankees season

message: I'm REALLY SERIOUS when I mention about the Yankees still reeling from the 1994 strike when they won the World Series. Buck Showalter and many players on the Yankees' 1994 team that would have played in the postseason were not there on the Yankees team that won in 1996. They were all gone, because they were affected by the strike, and it ruined their championship hopes. – SNIyer12, (talk), 01:12, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: There is absolutely nothing in those sources about the 1996 season. It's all about 1994, and that's where it belongs. Putting it here and implying any sort of connection between 1994 and 1996 is your original research based on synthesis of published material. – Muboshgu (talk) 02:37, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm confused here... if the manager and many players from 1994 werent on the 1996 team then how were the new players "reeling" from the strike? Your logic confounds me. Spanneraol (talk) 12:46, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The Yankees were affected by the strike. Throughout the 1996 World Series, the news media reached out to members of the 1994 team and asked them how much the strike affected them and many of them said that their time with the Yankees ended because of the strike, because that Yankee team was destined for a World Series championship. Some of them also said that they couldn't watch the World Series because of how they felt in 1994. – SNIyer12, (talk), 01:05, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yea, but that was the 94 team... why would that belong on the 96 page? Spanneraol (talk) 02:55, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: That team represented the best chance for a Yankees team to reach the postseason and win a World Series for the first time since losing the 1981 World Series before 1996, but they lost their chance. – SNIyer12, (talk), 11:49, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: 1994 strike
Talk:2000 New York Yankees season

message: I don't know how to fix this, but for some reason the 1999 standings are posted under the "regular season" section. Can somebody fix this? dool325 (talk) 01:43, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong Standings 
Talk:Max Pacioretty

message: "colliding the turnbuckle "
replace with "colliding with the turnbuckle"
:Phrase already removed. Stickee (talk) 12:04, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request from 99.241.34.81, 11 March 2011 

message: taken off ice
replace with "taken off the ice"
99.241.34.81 (talk) 03:18, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Stickee (talk) 12:05, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request from 99.241.34.81, 11 March 2011 
Talk:William D. Hill

message: William's middle name is Dabney, not David, per his daughter Alice Lanier Hill. I have uploaded her written account to Ancestry.com. I hesitate to update this Wiki article because my evidence, while written by his daughter, is contradicting the bio on Congress.gov and may not be viewed as trustworthy by comparison. Continuing to seek out further supporting evidence. 98.255.180.168 (talk) 05:44, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:William Stanbery

message: When I discovered the reason for his being censured, I realized how little the game has changed - just the players :-)
-- Michael David 02:02, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reason for censure 

message: These two sentences, in light of what follows them, seem like they're contradicting each other.
:"He was elected a Jacksonian to the United States House of Representatives in 1827 to fill the vacancy caused by the death of William Wilson. He was reelected as a Jacksonian in 1828 and as an Anti-Jacksonian in 1830."
So, in 1828, he's elected as a Jacksonian, and two years later is re-elected as an Anti-Jacksonian?! I double-checked "Jacksonian" to make sure I wasn't missing something, but, nope, they were pro-Jackson.
This was a man who completed hated President Jackson and hated his policy of forcibly removing the Indians! So much so that "In April 1832, he made accusations about Sam Houston, who was visiting Washington, D.C. at the time, on the floor of the House. He was attacking President Andrew Jackson through Houston, and accused him of being in league with John Von Fossen and Robert Rose. The three men bid on the supplying of rations to Indians who were being forcibly removed because of Jackson's Indian Removal Act of 1830."
Whatever he said on the floor of the House was enough to get Sam Houston so riled up that they got into it in the middle of Pennsylvania Avenue, with Houston attacking Stanbery with his cane, and albeit for a misfire of his gun, Stanbery would have shot the guy!
I guess it's possible that he could have just loved Jackson in 1828, and sent him flowers and candy every week, and then, because of his Indian Removal Act in 1830, decided he hated the guy with a passion. (Jackson was the guy who double-crossed the Creek Indians, and forged their chiefs' signatures on a treaty while they were away looking at the lands he was proposing for them.) So, possibly he seemed like a reasonable guy until 1830. 
I'm just asking the question of whether Stanbery completely changed his platform. (Today, a campaign opponent would say that he "flip-flopped." Or that, "he was for him, before he was against him." You know how that goes. As Michael David says, above, the game hasn't changed, only the players.)
Mrs rockefeller (talk) 22:31, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  These Sentences Seem Contradictory 

message: I removed a subsection that was unsourced. A web search showed that the passage closely follows a work of historical fiction published by something called Smashwords. The rather confusing version in this article has already been commented on above. — ℜob C. alias ALAROB 19:29, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed "Attack" section
Talk:Henry Aldous Dixon

message: User:Jasonanaggie just disambiguated the Farmers and Merchants Bank mention in this article to Farmers and Merchants Bank (Nampa, Idaho).  According to this article now, Dixon was supposedly operating v.p. there from 1922 on for some years.  It is unclear if the bank in Nampa was the entire bank or was just a branch in a bank company.  The main source of the Nampa bank article also seem to suggest that the bank merged into a First National Bank perhaps as early as 1920.  That source, the National Register nomination document for its building, may not be right on this.  Can someone with access to the Dixon particulars check? --doncram 05:40, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  what Farmers and Merchants bank?