Template talk:Protected areas of California

message: I'd like to add Snow Mountain Wilderness to the Protected Areas of California template.  What section should I put it in?  It's a wilderness area that's in Mendocino National Forest and it's administered by the U.S. Forest Service. — Mudwater (Talk) 13:13, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Snow Mountain Wilderness 

message: Just a thankyou to the editor that changed the default setting to "hide". I was removing it from articles as it made working impossible (I have put them all back in). I still think it is too large but cannot think of a better solution other than breaking it up into parts-a box for just national monuments, etc. Again, thanks! Marcia Wright (talk) 18:01, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Show/Hide setting 

message: The thread above was getting to be an eyesore, so I'll just start this subsection. Using AWB I just replaced all the other templates that were broken off from this major one, with this one. I started going through and checking articles to see if they have the new parameters, using a list compiled from AWB of articles that transclude this template now. I didn't get nearly all the way through, and saved the remaining work in a supage of mine titled Articles needing parameters. Its a bit of a misnomer though, because there are probably several pages in there that have a parameter attached already. Any help in this endeavor would be appreciated. Killiondude (talk) 06:46, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Arbitrary subsection

message: I figured out how to use AWB to clean out the category of pages that have no parameter attached to this template. As of right now, the only work that needs to be done with this template is to fix all the red links. Many of the redlinks actually have pages of the same topic, just under a different title. If you find such an instance, please change the link in the template to point towards the actual page (you can leave the title the same, pipping it if necessary. Killiondude (talk) 00:22, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hurrah! 

message: A new reserve has been added to the UC Natural Reserve System by a vote of the UC Regents as of July 14, 2011. 
The Steele Burnand Anza-Borrego Desert Research Center is managed by UC Irvine. It covers an area of 2,477 hectares/615,000 acres, which largely consists of adjacent Anza-Borrego Desert State Park. This acreage listing is authorized by agreement with Anza-Borrego Desert State Park.
The web page of the new reserve is here:
http://nrs.ucop.edu/reserves/anza-borrego/anza-borrego.htm
The headquarters of the reserve are located in a former country club at the outskirts of the town of Borrego Springs. The latitude and longitude of Borrego Springs is
33 degrees 15' 26" N / 116 degrees 22' 20" W
Note should probably point out that an agreement with Anza-Borrego Desert State Park and the Anza-Borrego Foundation makes the park available to reserve users.
The addition of the Steele Burnand Anza-Borrego Desert Research Center means that the UC Natural Reserve System as a whole now consists of 37 sites that include more than 750,000 acres.
Reference sources: 
a UC Irvine press release about the new reserve; the date reflects when UC Irvine closed escrow on the property, but not when the UC Regents voted to approve the new reserve
http://www.today.uci.edu/news/2011/05/nr_desert_110512.html
A Los Angeles Times article about the new reserve
http://articles.latimes.com/2011/may/12/local/la-me-0512-borrego-springs-20110510
The action of the UC Regents that approved the addition of the new reserve to the UC Natural Reserve System:
http://www.universityofcalifornia.edu/regents/aar/aar.html
download the pdf under July 2011 / Committee on Educational Policy
128.48.6.189 (talk) 00:04, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added a redlink to this navbox template.  Perhaps you'd care to create an article to satisfy the redlink?  Contact me on my talkpage if you would like help with this. —Stepheng3 (talk) 04:57, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request from 128.48.6.189, 21 September 2011 

message: Under the National Park System header, there are several National Monuments that are not actually controlled by the National Park Service, but rather the Bureau of Land Management and/or United States Forest Service. These include:
*Berryessa Snow Mountain National Monument
and
*Fort Ord
It is misleading to say that they are units of the National Park Service.
--Bentendo24 (talk) 00:54, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  National Park System 

message: I was considering creating an article for and including the Mill Creek Redwood Preserve in this template, but the preserve is a unit of the Monterey Peninsula Regional Park District. I thought I'd check here to see if it's appropriate to add a county-level category to this template, but this is already a long template. Is there another existing template that might be more appropriate? — btphelps (talk to me) (what I've done) 22:37, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  County level preserves 

message: 2604:2000:E8C1:2700:F195:B124:5AD5:17C5 (talk) 00:54, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. DRAGON BOOSTER  ★ 04:14, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 7 February 2017 

message: I have seen other states' protected areas templates contain private non-profits, so I've added that section here and including a list of examples. Please feel welcome to add more as you find them!
Rosenbergwrite (talk) 20:05, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  2021 - Adding Conservation Land Trusts