Talk:Cassern S. Goto

message: This word appears to be used too many timesand is not given any specific definition. A casual reader is not likely to understand the whole article
* What are you even talking about, that is the best version (and most accurate) Of C.S. Mulitlaser Multilaser Multilaser Goto I have seen to date.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:8109:A640:538:A866:E66A:B380:1F18 (talk) 13:14, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: multilasers

message: The issues of C.S. Goto's notability can be disputed, however the extremely divided reactions from the fan community (despite what my initial version of the page may have implied, there were multiple positive opinions of his works) and the Dawn of War connection justify placing a Wikipedia entry about him.--The Fifth Horseman 13:16, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: RE: Not a notable author

message: I am aware that the recent "Let the galaxy burn" antology from Black Library includes a previously unpublished story by Goto. I was, however, unable to find out what is that story's title. If anyone knows, please add it.--The Fifth Horseman 15:57, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Story missing from Bibliography 

message: As far as I can see there are no acceptable sources for the whole controversy issue. While I believe this controversy exists, all we have is Goto responding to one poster about one accuracy issues. And it is one of the more defensible of Goto's apparent inaccuracies. As currently written the controversy section seems biased in favour of Goto, lacks decent sources, and either needs a rewrite with sources or deletion. the_raptor 18:49, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources for controversy 

message: It seems the "official website" link is dead as of February 2nd 2013.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by CyberMurph (talk • contribs) 14:21, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Cassern S. Goto. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080517101427/http://www.blacklibrary.co.uk/ to http://www.blacklibrary.co.uk/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080129014140/http://forum.blacklibrary.com:80/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=6451 to http://forum.blacklibrary.com/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=6451
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:18, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: It seems like a quick tl;dr might be useful here. Anyways, to summarize why it's been vandalized often, the author is a somewhat controversial figure regarding his WH40k novels, which are often perceived by fans to be of low quality. Many such edits appearing to be coming from a link at this rather nsfw website. Just thought I'd provide a quick summary in case of further vandalism, since the linked forum thread isn't all that clear.--Ilikerainandstorms (talk) 16:01, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding the vandalism. 

message: Having written, even controversially, some licensed products for a production company without any notabile success and with no material in fifteen years, it seems to me that this contract writer does not merit a wikipedia entry. CyberMurph (talk) 21:14, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nominate for Deletion Due to Notability