lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Henry Laub

message: Henry Laub was a midshipman. Midshipmen are not officers.Royalcourtier (talk) 21:03, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not an officer 

message: I realize that two ships have been named after this young midshipman. But there is no reason indicated why this should be so. Many midshipmen died, none of the others were commended by congress or had ships named for them. There must have been a reason, and this should be given.Royalcourtier (talk) 21:05, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Ignimbrite

message: I removed the following dense tract of text not because it isn't interesting, but because it is, well, dense, very scientific, related to only one ignimbrite event, and is probably hacked from someone's paper or thesis. It is also overly technical for a public access encyclopedia. Please edit and discuss in general terms. Oh, and citations, pls.Rolinator (talk) 13:00, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced and possibly original research 

message: I put this in before i knew better. I am working through the information and hopefully adding the relevant information. I am also including the relevant citation.
P.S. I wish that this was original research, sadly just a lowly literature review.
Russjass (talk) 16:01, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sorry this was me 

message: I have put rheomorphic flow in the deposition section, not because that is where i think it belongs (which i dont) but because i do not know where else to put it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Russjass (talk • contribs) 16:37, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rheomorphic flow-where should it go? 

message: This sentence in the "Mineralogy" section requires credible references to support its assertion:
"Thus although tridymite and cristobalite are common minerals in ignimbrites, they may not be primary magmatic minerals."50.38.86.154 (talk) 00:12, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questionable assertion in Mineralogy section
Talk:Heather Farr

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Edofedinburgh 01:26, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Sideromelane

message: That is the weirdest picture of a rock/ mineral I've ever seen; it looks like a model of a bunch of benzene rings.  What causes this form?  It's glass, not crystals, right?  What caused the linked ring structure? Some more description is needed/ wanted. Mcswell (talk) 00:30, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture
Talk:Palagonite

message: I believe that palagonite forms very quickly after an eruption not as a weathering alteration product. I have research this topic and you may find results at www.monolake.org  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.121.33.140 (talk) 08:01, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  palagonite formation 

message: the definition here is absolutely wrong! hyaloclastite is teh texture caused by QUENCH FRAGMENTATION; you do not need sideromelane-- only glass due to quenching AND fragmentation due to that quenching process. The fragments, as a result, have cuspate, curvilinear margins. See McPhie et al., (1993)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.112.171.244 (talk) 03:24, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  hyaloclastite 

message: It would be great to have pictures of this stuff.  The Jade Knight (talk) 13:11, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 
Talk:Dutch famine of 1944–1945

message: The paragraph that the third generation experienced negative health effects needs a source. I looked through the publications on the topic fairly thoroughly and didn't find any claiming that result.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.205.101.251 (talk) 12:08, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scientific legacy 

message: Hello. Article refers to a literature that is not cited completely. "Banning (1946) p 93". Seems like it was copies from an academic paper without a full title. The source should be clearly identifiable and verifiable IMHO. Does anybody know the source? Thank you. w.0q (talk) 20:19, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Look at the Bibliography, first item. Banning, C. "Food Shortage and Public Health, First Half of 1945," Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science.... Rjensen (talk) 20:33, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks Rjensen! I didn't see the references are organised like this. I guess this talk can be deleted now? w.0q (talk) 17:07, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incomplete reference 

message: "Most of the victims were reported to be elderly men.[4]"
This seems weirdly out of place as a paragraph at the start of the article.  Could it be integrated into another section?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.247.229.82 (talk) 03:49, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intro 

message: Its selfevident that the title of this article is incorrect. Most of the deaths occurred in the period jan-may 1945. A better title is 
"Dutch famine of 1944-45". Best regards JRB-Europe (talk) 22:43, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: BMK (talk) 22:46, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  I have moved the article to Dutch famine of 1944–45 per MOS:ENDASH. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 16:12, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, both of you.  JRB-Europe (talk) 16:52, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Title is wrong

message: I'm not getting the suppositions put forth in this article.  In the third paragraph in this section (which has no sources cited by the way) it says that the Germans cut off the food supply.  But the article says that the Dutch railway workers went on strike in order to support the Allies' efforts to liberate the Netherlands via Operation Market Garden.  The article also says that the Germans supported Allied airdrops of food in occupied areas.  Doesn't make sense.  If they were deliberately trying to starve the Dutch, then why allow these operations?  Also, if the Germans didn't decree that the food shipments be cut off, how could the food have been transported if the rail lines were down?
Not sure if it's just the article that needs re-working or the history...or both?--RRskaReb talk 20:39, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: *For anyone using the admin-colorizing script, please note that despite the similarities of the background on their sig, RRekaReb is not an admin.  They refuse to change the color. Beyond My Ken (talk) 22:18, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Causes section
Talk:Ahmed Izzet Pasha

message: The daughter of the Vazir, Laila, visited the HRH Kapurthala, India in the years 1925. In order to settle here. However she moved later to New York
and married certain, millionare, Carl Homes. In India she got interested
in Diwan Jarmani Dass of Kapurthala. But not successful.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.98.82.58 (talk) 08:35, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Laila Izzat Pasha 

message: He wasnot born in Monastir - present day Bitola in the Republic of Macedonia but in Nasliç (Naslic) - present day Neapoli, Kozani in Greece   Nasliç was part of the Monastir Vilayet. Мико (talk) 11:10, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Place of birth
Talk:Mudpot

message: no mention of thermophiles - are there none in mud pots ? EdwardLane (talk) 00:06, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: A little Googling shows there are: e.g. , . --Avenue (talk) 10:49, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thermophiles 

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that :File:Mudpot at Lassen Volcanic National Park in August 2019.webm, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for October 14, 2022. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2022-10-14. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.9% of all FPs 12:16, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured picture scheduled for POTD
Talk:Gryphon (geology)

message: This is identical to the summary of a "Gryphon" on the mud volcano page. Unless anyone says anything more to expand this or says something in favor of keeping this page, I think this should just be deleted. IceUnshattered (talk) 00:14, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Anyone for redirecting to the Mud volcano page? IceUnshattered [ t ] 18:16, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delete?
Talk:Jim Jim Falls

message: I've removed the facilities section, because it seemed to be counter to the spirit of Wikipedia Is Not a Travel Guide. Since there are external links to travel sites, I don't think it's necessary of appropriate for an encyclopaedia to list available bathrooms and such. If there's a more natural way to incorporate that information into the article, I would be open to that. Ketsuekigata (talk) 19:33, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Facilities Section 

message: I've made an attempt to curb the peacock terms somewhat. I'm not entirely sure if the tag is still necessary, so I've left it for now. I'd be most appreciative if anyone would look over the article again and catch what I might've missed. Ketsuekigata (talk) 19:33, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertising/Peacock Terms 
Talk:Effusive eruption

message: I added information about the transitions between effusive and explosive eruption patterns. I also reworded the first and second paragraphs of the prior edit, as they were directly plagiarized from other sources. I summarized the information that was plagiarized and cited the original source from which it was copied by the prior author.
M. Blanchard (talk) 06:16, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Additions 

message: You can help me 136.158.103.152 (talk) 07:03, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Science 

message: Volcanic Eruption 136.158.103.152 (talk) 07:04, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Science
Talk:Maenporth

message: Is there enough material to make the account of the shipwreck a main article, now? There is a category "Category:Shipwrecks in the English Channel" which needs development.Vernon White . . . Talk  17:21, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with the above so I have created a new article about the wreck of the trawler Ben Asdale from material removed from the article about Maenporth. I have left a message on the talk page of Wikipedia:WikiProject Ships requesting the new article be improved by an editor experienced in shipping. Andy F (talk) 08:35, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Shipwreck
Talk:Kerguelen hotspot

message: Noted very stub like and as already labelled as a mid importance article did something about this. Not a straight forward topic and as in the middle of Indian Ocean probably explains slow improvement rate and some controversy remaining. Will no doubt need further work by others to improve the first real attempt at an article. ChaseKiwi (talk) 12:58, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Improved
Talk:Miracles (TV series)

message: Somebody has nominated this episode article for deletion, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Patient (2nd nomination). Matthew 11:29, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Patient 

message: A request for comments has been started that could affect the inclusion 
or exclusion of episode and character, as well as other fiction articles. Please 
visit the discussion at 
Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(fiction)#Final_adoption_as_a_guideline. Ikip (talk) 11:06, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for comment on articles for individual television episodes and characters
Talk:Lucy Hawking

message: "Father is Stephen Hawking. Mother is Jane Wilde. Two brothers are Robert and Tim Hawking."  Moved rather than deleted becuase it contains additional information about the rest of the family and (if edited) might be useful.--Plad2 (talk) 06:01, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Text moved from main page 28 March 2010

message: according to reference 1 (at the time I'm writing this) her year of birth is 1969, not 1970 as specified in the current wikipedia article. See http://books.google.fr/books?id=yL3RBMEI5OgC&pg=PR15 . I'm correcting this, and I'm leaving this note just in case 1970 was inspired by a different, equally trustable but lost resource someone else may be willing to excavate :) Ab930 (talk) 00:58, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of birth
Talk:Robotech: Invasion

message: I believe this article is no longer neutral. It lists criticisms (with no sources) but few positive aspects of the game. In fact, it almost all is original research. I don't mind that, as long as the person who writes it stays neutral, which he or she has not.
However, I am too biased in favor of the game to try and fix it without making it worse, can someone help?
24.58.112.13 11:42, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not only is it unsourced and not neutral, but it's written incredibly amateurishly. I was thinking about removing the whole section, but for now I just commented it out. It does need heavily re-writing, that section, I would say. --Dreaded Walrus 01:07, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality of this Article
Talk:Mokoia Island

message: This islan is sacred from the Arawa tribes  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.89.87.136 (talk) 22:24, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Mochitsura Hashimoto

message: This article says 2 struck USS ind. 
Kaiten article (while not a kaiten) says 3/6 type 93 unmanned struck. 
What's the truth of the number of strikes? :)  If it's unknown it should say "At least 2"
6 were launched.
70.160.12.49 (talk) 04:47, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: In research of a related topic, I happened to run across information in several places suggesting that of the 6 torpedoes fired, for sure 2 torpedoes and possibly 3 were reported to have struck the ship. This was the best record available, apparently even in the official information on the event from both sides, including survivor testimony and reports from the attacking submarine. There was some speculation on whether a possible 3rd torpedo impact might have been merely a secondary explosion. 69.73.82.52 (talk) 03:32, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  # of torpedos 

message: The article said said he has a wife and four children in the Early Life section.
Then later stated in the Sinking of Indianapolis section that his "entire family had been killed" in the Hiroshima bombing. How could he have had a daughter in 1947 if his "entire family," including his wife, has been killed in Aug. 1945?
Internet research seem to indicate most of the comments regarding his family were propagated from one or more articles which described the Indianapolis sinking and survivor reunions, and provided some minor details on Hashimoto's 1990 attendance to a reunion and a secondarily-reported quote that Hashimoto himself said something to the effect of, "my whole family was killed," in reference to Hiroshima. There may be some room for interpretation on how literal this was intended, and whether the intent of his actual wording and/or the translation into English was accurate (it was reported he was speaking through a translator). Much of the current information regarding his family's fate appears to stem from this quote, and may have since been conveyed or reworded in a way to further confuse the issue (such as being transformed into assumed factual statements like, "his entire family was killed.")
There is a reasonably high likelihood he was referencing his own close blood-relatives (parents/siblings/etc.). Available reporting also indicates attendance to later survivor's reunions by his daughter (Sonoe) and granddaughter, proving that at least his wife had to have survived the war. 69.73.82.52 (talk) 03:06, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Interestingly, the Japanese Wikipedia mentions his son Yoshihiro Hashimoto and his grandson Yoshimitsu who both attend/attended (?) memorial services at the Kaiten Memorial Museum every year in March. This website even shows a photo of his son (3rd pic from below): https://gokoku.exblog.jp/17329523 Gunsou (talk) 01:43, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding family - article is confusing
Talk:Pyroclastic shield

message: Interesting if true, but I have my doubts.  The sources involved confirm they are shield volcanoes who have also had pyroclastic phases during their volcanic life cycles, but does that make them pyroclastic shields?  From the description of pyroclastic shields in the article, I get the impression that pyroclastics are part of their eruption style as shield-building volcanoes.  But the volcanoes in question seem to have shifted from chiefly one style of eruption (basalt shields) to chiefly another style (pyroclastic cones) over a long time. - Gilgamesh (talk) 11:41, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think I've seen any source refer to Gran Canaria or Tenerife as "pyroclastic shields". Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 13:17, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I retain similar doubts, about those and Pico Basilé.  But I suppose, as a retentionist at heart, I would prefer we are thorough with fact-checking before removing them from the list.  Thing is, my level of knowledge on pyroclastic shields is limited to Wikipedia and whatever a superficial Google search will provide.  This topic needs the attention of an expert who'll know what reliable references to cite and what citations simply won't exist. - Gilgamesh (talk) 12:50, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: These are not examples of pyroclastic shields and a claim that they are pyroclastic shields is not supported by the cited source references. The editor who added these examples seems to have misunderstood their own sources. Pyroclastic deposits occur at many shield volcanoes but only a few shield volcanoes are pyroclastic shield volcanoes. Also, the Las Cañadas volcano of Tenerife was/is actually a stratovolcano not a shield volcano. Therefore, I shall delete these three entries from this article's list of examples. GeoWriter (talk) 11:47, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your review.  And sorry for the delay in responding. - Gilgamesh (talk) 17:13, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gran Canaria, Pico Basilé and Tenerife as pyroclastic shields
Talk:Thomas Armstrong (musician)

message: I wonder if the present title - Thomas Armstrong (conductor) - is the best option? He did a bit of conducting throughout his career, but he was primarily known as an organist until 1955 and as principal of the Royal Academy of Music thereafter. Might it be better to call him Thomas Armstrong (musician)? It wouldn't be applied to anybody else on the DAB page, I feel, and would not confuse anyone. Tim riley talk  11:50, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Now done. Tim riley talk  17:41, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title of article
Talk:Daly College

message: Though many websites mention the date of foundation as 1882. Lord Curzon's 1905 speech mentions that to be 1881. whereas Dr. Rajendra Prasad letter, Correspondence and Select Documents: January 1960 to February 1963, by Rajendra Prasad, Valmiki Choudhary. Published by Allied, 1995. Page 203, mentions 1960 to be the 76th anniversary, which effectively makes 1884 the year of foundation! 
The Imperial Gazetteer of India on the other hand, makes it to be 1886!  Imperial Gazetteer of India, v. 9, p. 386. "In 1876 a special class was opened in the Indore Residency school for the sons of Native chiefs on the western side of Central India. Ten years later the Daly College was opened, at which several of the present ruling chiefs have been educated. In 1903 the status of the college was reduced, the idea being that important chiefs and Sardars should go to
the Mayo College at Ajmer, while only the petty chiefs and Thakurs would be educated at Indore. Steps are now being taken to re-estab-lish the Daly College on the same footing as the Mayo College. " --Ekabhishek (talk) 13:34, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of foundation

message: 1. History of the School
2. Campus
3. Recent Events
4. Noteable Alumni
5. External Links
6. Articles? Is there enough content here
7. Sports? - Big role in squash
8. Principals?
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Deveshnakra (talk • contribs) 07:03, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested Sections
Talk:Bristol Water

message: Here's a Spanish source dated 03/07/2011 relating to decisions before the part-sale. I won't try to translate it myself, and would rather not resort to Google Translate. -- Trevj (talk) 10:48, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grupo Agbar 
Talk:Classification of Arabic languages

message: I've splitted the page into Arabic languages and Ancient North Arabian. --Koryakov Yuri 12:06, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I removed this:
 Old or Ancient North Arabian, a number of closely related extinct dialects of pre-Islamic Arabia:
on account of Ahmad al-Jallad's work. Wikipedia's movement on the classification of Arabian Semitica has been cautious - justifiably so, given the cranks out there. But I think we no longer need such caution.
So my request to the editors of the Arabic project here is to delete "Ancient North Arabian" as a category, although the article itself is valuable and should stay. Instead this article on "Arabic languages" should take over that category's function. I'm also thinking it were better to rename this article to "ArabiAN languages".
--Zimriel (talk) 22:15, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Ancient North Arabian to be subsumed under Arabic Languages as a category
Talk:Indian Heaven

message: How does the editor decide which vent is 'notable'? Guanlong wucaii 10:25, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There isn't any criteria.  If you think it makes mores sense, the heading could be changed to simply "vents" or "selected vents."  I think it should be in some what made clear that if not all vents are listed that only a subset was included. --Burntnickel (talk) 21:33, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vents
Talk:Saint Andrew's Day

message: I removed a Citation Needed dated Nov 2012 that was at the beginning of the St. Andrew's Eve section. It was formatted badly without closing brackets, and so covered the whole section. I removed it because it was impossible to know if it referred to a specific piece of information, or to everything about the Eve. 
-- Protoblast (talk) 17:17, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: * The search engine Google is celebrating November 30, Scotland's national day, with a special St Andrew's Day logo
--Mais oui! (talk) 16:59, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  St Andrew's Day commemorated in Google doodle 

message: The Romanian information is about an entirely different holiday: St John's Eve rather than St. Andrew's Eve. An understandable mistake. 
Citations: http://www.romania-insider.com/priests-bless-water-in-celebration-of-epiphany-day-boboteaza-in-romania/44983/ 
http://vegetalshapes.com/Basil.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.17.179.2 (talk) 21:02, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: St Andrew's Day is a very popular feast day in Poland (Andrzejki). I can say it's a polish equivalent of Halloween. Although, today it's more just an occasion to party, there's many interesting traditional magical rituals related to celebration of this day, which should be mentioned.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.161.44.204 (talk) 10:53, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:   

message: The Traditions and celebrations section states that Saint Andrew "is the patron saint of Cyprus". I cannot find any source for this. As far as I am aware, [Barnabas] is the patron saint of Cyprus, and this is also stated in that corresponding Wikipedia article. BadHorsie823 (talk) 17:37, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: The page's protection level has changed since this request was placed. You should now be able to edit the page yourself. If you still seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:25, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 30 November 2021