Talk:The Real World: Philadelphia

message: :Image:RWPhiladelphiaCast.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:08, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:RWPhiladelphiaCast.jpg

message: I just added some references to the building and Philadelphia. This is all appropropriate because of the way the show and its cast related to the city. --evrik (talk) 17:07, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for adding material about the house.  However, you did not provide a source supporting the material you added about the producers, unions, mayor and governor brokering a deal, as the two sources you inserted into that section do not appear to mention this.  And despite this and other unsourced information, you removed the unreferenced tag at the top of the article.  I restored the tag, and added more section and passage-specific ones detailing the need for sources.  Also, the article on the culture of Philadelphia does not mention The Real World, so I replaced that with the one on Cultural Depictions of Philadelphia, since that article does mention it, and seems a bit more relevant.  Is that a fair compromise?  Thanks again. Nightscream 01:19, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Cool.  (I assume you mean the Philadelphia Inquirer, right? :-) )Nightscream (talk) 02:43, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: yes. --evrik (talk) 16:22, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Philadelphia Stuff

message: I believe a WP:RS is still needed for "his religious parents don't accept his sexual orientation".  The source states that "his religious parents don't accept his lifestyle", which does not support this statement. There is a big difference between being gay and living a gay lifestyle. I understand the need to avoid plagiarism, but I do not feel the paraphrased statement is entirely accurate. In addition, if I recall correctly, his parents objected to much more about his lifestyle than simply the fact that he is gay. Thanks. Plastikspork (talk) 02:02, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, I didn't know that. Can you elaborate on that last point? Which episode was it, and what were their objections? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 02:06, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  sexual orientation