lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Heart (band)

message: Someone desperately needs to go through the entire Heart discography release by release and correct the linkages.  Between studio albums, live albums, compilations, and DVD's, there are a lot of inconsistencies with what follows what, and a number of the items are without articles or stubs.  For example, the Dreamboat Annie Live page shows the next release as Live: Soundstage (2008), but this item has no article/stub and does not appear on the discography page.
Part of the confusion stems from items like Dreamboat Annie Live, which released as both a video DVD and an audio CD.  (Apparently the same is true for Live: Soundstage.)  What a mess, and I'm not certain what would be the best way to correct things.  Hopefully a more experienced user can get things straightened out—much thanks to anyone who does!
2601:3CA:204:F860:CD1C:37A5:C659:BEBB (talk) 23:18, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Previous/next album links
Talk:Smith & Wesson Model 22A

message: I will add a photo (taken by me of my personal 22A) shortly.
I purchased a 22A recently. My first outing had a few jams and failure to feed. I found a burr on the entrance to the chamber I removed and polished the feed ramp. Second outing I fired 500 rounds of the inexpensive bulk Federal rounds with not one single problem. ```` N2shotokai  —Preceding unsigned comment added by N2shotokai (talk • contribs) 16:45, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:State Council

message: Members of the Republic of China State Council included Mo Teh-hui, Masud Sabri, Ma Lin (warlord).
http://books.google.com/books?id=r3AJFusMHJwC&pg=PA23&dq=ma+lin+muslim&hl=en&ei=5X2qTJmEIcGB8gbula3cBw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=6&ved=0CEQQ6AEwBTgo#v=onepage&q=ma%20lin%20muslim&f=false
Page 81
http://books.google.com/books?id=d884AQAAIAAJ&q=Messrs.+Ma+Fu-liang+and+Ismail+are+advisers+of+the+National+Military+Council,+while+Dr.+Masoud,+former+State+Councillor+of+the+National+Government,+is+a+member+of+the+Legislative+Yuan.+Other+Mohammedan+members+of+the+Legislative+Yuan+include&dq=Messrs.+Ma+Fu-liang+and+Ismail+are+advisers+of+the+National+Military+Council,+while+Dr.+Masoud,+former+State+Councillor+of+the+National+Government,+is+a+member+of+the+Legislative+Yuan.+Other+Mohammedan+members+of+the+Legislative+Yuan+include&hl=en&sa=X&ei=EAMfU5rqIez70wG-2IHIBw&ved=0CCoQ6AEwAA
http://books.google.com/books?ei=EAMfU5rqIez70wG-2IHIBw&id=d884AQAAIAAJ&dq=Messrs.+Ma+Fu-liang+and+Ismail+are+advisers+of+the+National+Military+Council%2C+while+Dr.+Masoud%2C+former+State+Councillor+of+the+National+Government%2C+is+a+member+of+the+Legislative+Yuan.+Other+Mohammedan+members+of+the+Legislative+Yuan+include&focus=searchwithinvolume&q=Ismail
Rajmaan (talk) 12:51, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  State Council of the Republic of China
Talk:EMD BL2

message: I have read that the BL1 Demo #499 had an air throttle. This was not an accepted railroad practice at the time and the air throttle was replaced with a mechanical throttle making it the equivalent of a BL2 before sale to the C&EI. See Extra 2200 South issue #46 pp 21-24 for BL1/BL2 photos and discussion. --SSW9389 17:47, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

message: The tractive effort shown in the information box is only correct for the six Pere Marquette/C&O units. Weight varied on BL2s from 218,340 pounds for Demonstrator 499 to 
246,000 pounds for the Bangor and Aroostook units. That would vary the Tractive Effort at 25% adhesion to a range of 54,585 pounds to 61,500 pounds. Weights for the different railroads that owned BL2s is shown on page 20 of Extra 2200 South issue #46. 
All BL2s were built with 62:15 gearing except the Western Maryland units built with 65:12 gearing. The WM units were later regeared to 62:15. The Rock Island units were regeared to 61:16 gearing possibly in 1951 when steam generators were added.--SSW9389 10:48, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Weight, Tractive Effort and Gearing

message: Several online sources give the BL1 build date as February 1948. That is incorrect as the actual build date was September 1947. The February 1948 date is when the air throttle was replaced with a standard electric throttle. And the February 1948 date may have been when a builders number was assigned to #499. See Extra 2200 South issue #46 pages 21-22. And Extra 2200 South issue #79 C&EI Roster page 19.--SSW9389 15:56, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: BL1 Build Date

message: This article is currently at Good Article Review. LuciferMorgan 02:15, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Good Article Review

message: This article has been delisted per consensus discussion at Good Article Review.  The archived results of the discussion can be found at Wikipedia:Good article review/Archive 18. --Jayron32|talk|contribs 05:40, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Delisted from the Good Article list

message: A user named Graywalls has replaced the entire history section with the words "EMD's diesel program was well underway in the late 1940s and early 1950s" and nothing else. I reverted the edits because it gives barely any information compared to what it replaced. 24.14.45.36 (talk) 19:53, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverted an edit
Talk:National Council (Austria)

message: In view of the content of the article, is the :Category:National lower houses correct here? Mikkalai 02:43, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Good question. On the one hand, Austria's constitution does not refer to the National Council as  lower house. On the other hand, the National Council is a lower house in the sense that this is were the legislative action is - the Federal Council hardly ever really does anything, in true upper-house fashion. Ratatosk 14:07, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)

message: This following sentence in the section "Peculiarities" is not correct:
Austria's federal constitution defines Austria to be a presidential democracy: the executive branch of government is supposed to be headed by the president and not to be answerable to the legislative branch. 
According to the Austrian constitution the government is headed by the chancellor and not by the president (although the latter is, in theory, totally free to appoint anyone he wants to be chancellor). Furthermore, the President is bound by the constitution to dismiss the government, if there is a successful Motion of no confidence, thus the government is answerable to the legislative branch.  Gugganij 11:15, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong information 
Talk:Robert Klark Graham

message: is 218 according to this article; 215 as per William Shockley. Tintin (talk) 16:14, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The number of kids ... 

message: Can someone site where this line came from ? 
"These criteria were numerous and exacting: for example, male donors were required to have an IQ above 180, while female recipients were required to be married and well-to-do."
I read one of the articles that said one of the offspring had an IQ of 180 but nothing about a numerical requirement to join.
*That seems extremely unlikely - I don't think more than 0.001 of the population have an IQ that high. Robmods 20:43, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As it has not been sourced, I have removed it, and replaced it with "extremely high IQs." I believe the actual number was 140, but since I cannot source this number either, I won't add it. 70.181.161.24 01:00, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intelligence requirements 

message: Why the reference to the requirements for male donors? I doubt that there were any female donors....101.98.163.177 (talk) 02:25, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Male donors 

message: Someone created an audio book in 2015-6 of Robert Klark Graham's 1970 book 'The Future of Man' https://archive.org/details/RobertKlarkGrahamTheFutureOfMan and I'm wondering if this is a legitimate external link or not, is it a derivative work when someone creates an audiobook with some commentary or would this be a copyright violation? TonyMorris68 (talk) 15:49, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Audiobook of Robert Klark Graham's 'The Future of Man'
Talk:Liz Phair (album)

message: This article is included in the "Controversial albums" category.  What makes this album controversial?  The article mentions that fan reactions to the record's release implied that Phair had "sold out".  Is that in and of itself enough to make this album controversial?  I have not heard the record so I don't know if the content itself deals with controversial themes.  --"buck 00:18, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The controversial part is probably the lyrics to "H.W.C." —BassBone (my talk · my contributions) 08:39, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversy

message: The outtakes really are listed before the actual tracks?  What's the thought there...? 12.162.122.5 (talk) 20:44, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: formatting
Talk:OST

message: IMO the piece about OST being used mainly in anime genres is BS. I never had anything to do with anime, just with "normal" soundtrack but I know the phrase OST very well and most of my comrades do too. I for one am for deleting this part of the explanation.
i just read it, thought the same and looked in the discussion...et voila! i deleted it 84.169.225.232 01:49, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  OST as in soundtrack
Category talk:Neo-Nazis

message: This list is quite possibly libellous. Much as I deplore the work of David Irving, for example, he cannot be characterised as a "neo-Nazi". Mind you, he's probably not so keen on litigation these days.Dr Zen 04:39, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I will copy your obsolete comment to the David Irving talk page. -- 70.231.133.161 23:16, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Necessary Illusions

message: I'm sure he would be flattered, but Strauss's noble lies are actually Platos. MoodyGroove 17:07, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Noble lies of Leo Strauss

message: Possible categorisations of this book include:
* Category:Books critical of Israel 
* Category:Books critical of Zionism 
either or both depending on content.
I personally interpret the categories as follows: 
*the first category as relating to criticisms of actions of the state of Israel 
*the second category as relating to criticisms of support for the existence of a Jewish homeland.
The book has been placed in "Category:Books critical of Zionism" and there are "see also" links between the two category pages.
How would the book best be categorised? Gregkaye (talk) 00:18, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Categories of criticism
Talk:Abstract impressionism

message: I changed the link to art history guide (under the further reading section) because arthistoryguide.com no longer directs to a website on the topic.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.197.59.149 (talk) 03:58, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changed link to art history guide 

message: Hi everyone, 
I'm working on this page for my university assignment. I look forward to engaging with all of you! Please leave comments about anything. -- Riotgrrll (talk) 05:15, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updates 

message: I changed the "Country" in the infobox from "United States" to "Mainly United States, United Kingdom". It wasn't a US-only movement, and 3 of the 5 artists mentioned in the infobox were British, one French/Russian, and only one American. 
(I know very little about this subject, but shouldn't Phillip Guston be in the infobox? In the History section Guston is described as the major developer of the style.) Newburyjohn (talk) 09:05, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Country specified in infobox
Talk:Nobility of the Kingdom of Hungary

message: The content of this article is quite strange...For example, Emperor / King / Prince are no noble titles, actually... Juro 00:58, 19 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Right. Until someone writes a page on Hungarian royalty, I move those sentences here. Alensha 21:38, 7 Oct 2004 (UTC)

text: It was extremely BAD idea to hide information! Mikkalai 06:04, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Muslims/Protected

message: Why now after the dispute seem to be somewhat over? OneGuy 01:28, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Prove it. Post the evidence that Muslims celebrated terrorist bomb blows, and do it WITHOUT citing political (or land dispute) cases like Palestine, Kashmir, or Iraq. And remember, you must prove that celebrations occurred in large numbers and was seen on the media like Al - Jazeera (as the article originally claimed -- not an unknown name of a religious fanatic). OneGuy 02:15, 23 Oct 2004 (UTC)

text: That's not true. The root of cause of the problem in the examples you gave (like Palestinian) is land and political. The religion is used latter to justify the action. There were no suicide bombings in Iraq before the US invasion. Now there are. Why? The root cause is not religion in these political/land disputes. You have not proven anything here. As for out of context quotes and rambling below, read the Bible. You will find a lot more quotes to justify anything. Proves nothing. You failed to give any convincing example of large group of Muslims celeberating every terrorist attack. Try again. OneGuy 18:02, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Protected
Talk:Rococo furniture style

message: This entry isn't going to be very useful if merged with Rococo. Rococo isn't characterized by elaborate but light and graceful ornamentation, the nature of the ornamentation is what characterizes Rococo, which may also be ponderous and clunky. Not all Rococo furniture is excessively ornate: a Louis XV chair may have no ornament save a small flowerhead at the top of the rail and a little floret at each knee.  Rococo is rarely mis-spelled Rococco. It was not originally used to describe the "grottos at Versailles". Rococo was confined to two dimensions only in the sense that drawings precede the finished product. The independent development of Chinoiserie preceded Rococo in engravings on silver and in ceramics. Whether any style has "transcended good taste, hence the critical aspects of the description" doesn't help a reader identify what's rococo about a piece of furniture. The Second Rococo, as Germans and Austrians call it, was actually a huge success: many pieces of 1860s English and French furniture sit in museum collections as 18th century.
Of the current entry, only the following statements are accurate and useful:
English rococo tended to be more restrained, for example Chippendale's designs for ribon backed chairs. The most successful exponent of English Rococo was probably Thomas Johnson a gifted carver and furniture designer working in London in the mid 1700s. --Wetman 07:49, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Then are you saying it should be deleted?  --Whosyourjudas (talk) 20:39, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC)

text: We don't have to merge the whole of this article into Rococo.  We can selectively put in what makes sense, then turn this into a redirect probably.  Or delete this after the merge, given the strange capitalization.  I'm actually going to move it now to correct that. --Whosyourjudas (talk) 04:14, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: move complete to Rococo furniture style from Rococo Furniture Style. --Whosyourjudas (talk) 04:16, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Albert Moulton Foweraker

message:  — ßottesiηi Tell me what's up 03:24, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

message: Is it okay to byword background info anent the hereinaforeshownabove? 2A00:23C7:2B13:9001:4DD9:395A:783C:26AC (talk) 01:26, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Without shadow “Foweraker” is moresolilike beautiful than ‘Fouracre’.
Talk:2005 Saudi Arabian municipal elections

message: Although women are forbid to vote in this upcoming municipal election, I think is justified that the vote of women be postponed for the moment citing administrative problems. Saudi women should wait and I am positive they will get the vote sooner or later. MFT
You've got to be kidding me! Wait! Why? With billions of dollars the admin problems could have been solved in days. Woman can't vote because they are considered property and 2nd class citizens.  That is the religious belief in the country. AA
This is not an election. Since women cannot vote and only half the seats are up for election, this is propaganda. This article is too pro-Saudi. Andrew pmk 20:46, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ethnology

message: The articles Cultural anthropology, Ethnology and Social anthropology are wildly, almost unbelievably, redundant.  I propose that they be merged and redirected to one (more fully sourced, articulate and complete) article, with short sections explaining the doctrinal, pedagogical and methodological differences between (American-led) cultural and (British-led) social anthropology, and how they relate to the overall view of ethnology from its origins to today, and integrating all the material.  I don't care what article the final result lives at.  The present state of the articles is very confusing to the reader, and gives the impression that all three of these are separate fields, when they absolutely are not, they are simply three different lenses from which to view precisely the same endeavo[u]r. I'm labeling this merge proposal "tentative" because I have not slapped up any merge tags; I think some discussion is in order as to what the merge target should be. Keeping these articles separate (other than as short articles limited to discussion of how the particular branch/variant differs from others, the way the Philology article relates to the Linguistics article) is silly and unhelpful to the reader. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont]  ‹(-¿-)› 23:25, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge discussion notice copied from [[Talk:Cultural anthropology]] 

message: Ethnology vs. ethnography: "Compared to ethnography, the study of single groups through direct contact with the culture, ethnology takes the research that ethnographers have compiled and then compares and contrasts different cultures." Although I do not have a specific counter-example, I am not sure this is always true. I think some ethnographers would work this cross-cultural comparisons. I think this claim should be cited. Not an ethnologist, though...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Postdeborinite (talk • contribs) 16:24, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Right; it's definitely not always true. The lead section needs to distinguish this term from ethnology (and the conceptually closely related cultural anthropology) clearly, noting where the terms overlap and where they diverge. Even then it's going to be hard to do this in a way that avoids PoV pushing.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  16:28, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ethnology vs. ethnography 

message: Ethnology and Ethnic studies -Inowen (talk) 02:54, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Differentiate or merge
Talk:Karadeniz Ereğli

message: ==Untitled==
There are no coal mines in or near Eregli.  Coal comes from Zonguldak by rail, which is maybe 30 miles away.--Murat (talk) 03:09, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: There are no coal mines in or near Eregli.  Coal comes from Zonguldak by rail, which is maybe 30 miles away.--Murat (talk) 03:09, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I cleared out the link to Baba burnu. Because the target article is not the Baba burnu in Zonguldak . It is on Aegean Sea. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 09:34, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Baba burnu 
Talk:Stalagmite

message: I find these things fascinating, and I hope someone with expert knowledge does some more work on this article.  How about some photos?  What about timespans?  Oldest stalagmite?  Largest stalagmite?  User:Palefire
I wonder if Stalagmite should redirect to stalactite, seeing as they are formed by the same process, and this article seems to mostly consist of explaining the difference between the two. Sfnhltb 07:30, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is it known to have these in your ice cubes at home? Just check these out...
http://i57.photobucket.com/albums/g205/Dom0803/DSCF6415.jpg
http://i57.photobucket.com/albums/g205/Dom0803/DSCF6417.jpg
Dom0803 17:33, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stalagmites in my freezer 

message: How long would a stalagmite several feet long take to form? What about a soda straw of a similar length? 89.240.202.53 21:39, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questions 

message: About this line: "Stalagmites should normally not be touched..."
I understand that cavers would prefer Stalagmites to NOT be touched, but does that mean it's a fact that Stalagmites should not be touched? Kinda like saying "You should not pollute the ocean" in an article about the ocean. It might be true, but not factual. 159.33.175.12 (talk) 23:27, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should not be touched? 

message: The section on stalagmite formations in lava tubes suggests that lavacicles can be stalagmites, whereas the lavacicle article seems to restrict lavacicles to stalactites. Which is correct?
Philip.coleman (talk) 08:13, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I've reworded that bit to say that stalagmites do form associated with some lavacicles - I've seen such myself, but the word lavacicle is derived from icicle so they only hang down. Mikenorton (talk) 11:08, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lavacicles Vs. Stalagmites: article inconsistency 

message: It appears that this article only specifically states that stalagmites are limestone formations only which is strictly false. While there already is a lavacicle article, it notes the lavacicle term is generic. I have sources that could add to the lavacicle article, even noting the origination of the term, as well as broadening the stalactite/stalagmite articles to be inclusive of non-limestone formations. 
I may recommend that the lavacicle article be migrated to inclusions in both the stalactite/stalagmite articles on lava formations, since lavacicles are both stalactites and stalagmites and obviously generic in description. Perhaps this article should differentiate between primary formations (those in lava) and secondary formations (those in limestone, etc.) Leitmotiv (talk) 03:06, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Limestone bias 

message: Calcium Carbonate has a chemical symbol of CaCO3, this is part of the process which includes acid rain, which can from a cavern and lead to the formation of stalactites and stalagmites. ----  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.181.129.234 (talk) 16:04, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Calcium Carbonate