lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Timor Gap

message: I edited this article by copy pasting my studies on the issue.
They are truncated however it, i believe, provides a mroe clear insight into the issue regarding the Timor Gap.
:OK, I moved your stuff below the existing article. Do you have any sources that you could point to?--Commander Keane 05:43, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: earlier comments

message: It seems silly to have four stub templates, and it doesnt really fit in any of them since it is between indonesia and australia. is there a more general stub that could be used? --Astrokey44 03:09, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  stub template? 

message: Are there any objections to the suggested merge from Timor Gap Treaty?  It seems that the term "Timor Gap" is a term of convenience, (generally) used in respect of the Treaty and the previous negotiations and issues surrounding the treaty.  Having two articles will limit expansion of both and cause confusion over what belongs where.  A redirect is appropriate. Moondyne 07:50, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Support long time needed to happen the merge SatuSuro 08:53, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merge

message: The TIMOR GAP company was added to this article in February. The article is on the geographic area.
The introduction is now entirely on this company.   
A new article can be created for this company. With the information removed. Inserting an about in the introduction of this article with a link to the company.
Or the information on the geographic area can be merged (incorporated) into the existing Timor Gap Treaty, Timor Sea Treaty and Treaty on Certain Maritime Arrangements in the Timor Sea articles.
There was a proposal in 2008 to merge information.--Melbguy05 (talk) 01:38, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  TIMOR GAP company. Create new article? or merge content into treaty pages
Talk:Libman v Quebec (AG)

message: Rated this article as stub class today;  it needs an infobox and some referencing to reach Start class, IMO.  PKT 13:20, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Haebangchon

message: I'm glad to see that you moved your stuff in. One quick thing you'll want to address. All of your references are at the end. You want to copy the  tags into the text of the article as Wikipedia:Inline citations. I'd do that right away! —mako๛ 02:39, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Korean Wikipedia won't be a reference since Wikipedia itself is not a reliable source but you can copy any of the references that are used in the Korean article. If it's not already linked, you can also add a link to the Korean article through the Languages linking functionality on the left-hand column. —mako๛ 04:50, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  More Feedback 

message: : You did a great job on the article. I have some suggestions that might improve the article. 
- Maybe you can include the byname of haebangchon, gaegunnuh?(개건너). http://guro.grandculture.net/Contents?local=guro&dataType=01&contents_id=GC03000115 . This website explains the origin of the name. 
- There are some attractions such as arthill and 108 stairway (108하늘계단). Description of the attractions and perhaps a picture of it would help people to understand what the area is like. http://www.seoulstory.kr/search/view/5777 
Hope this helps:) Good luck finalizing the article!'=
: Nice Article! I added a info box with a photo hopefully you can fill in the rest. andyavocado (talk)   12:14, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Peer Review

message: This area was THE main housing area for US military personnel living off base from 1960s-1990s.  HardyandTiny 05:38, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lacks history of US military off base housing 

message: As stated above HardyandTiny 05:40, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  108 Stairway in not in Hebangcheon 

message: The firing range was located where the Daewoo apartments are currently located. HardyandTiny 06:02, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  HBC was never the site of a "shooting field".
Talk:Daechi-dong

message: So most of the dong of Gangnam-gu actually have multiple dong within them.  Daechi has four, so let's talk about how to approach all the various dong articles using this one as a prototype.  For instance, should we make four smaller maps?  Or just one labelled one?  Is it necessary?  For now, I'm going to make four sections on this page. DaronDierkes (talk) 06:11, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Nice work.. I've been meaning to make more Seoul pages, esp. around Gangnam, but never got round to it. I've wikified / cleaned up as appropriate, need to be careful with trivia about local buses and department stores which are travel / city guide territory rather than encyclopedic. There is a hilarious line in a Bundang article about the fact that "Many call taxis are available which will take you to your destination for a fee". Well I never... It's also a stretch to make an unsourced claim that any given area in Seoul is especially famous for hagwon, you simply get more and better hagwon in more densely populated and affluent areas, of which Daechi is both. Ah yes, the sub-dong... Seems there must be a simple way to point out their location on the map, beyond that there isn't much to say about the individual sub-dong themselves. Either a caption below and / or colors on the map would probably do the trick. I've summarized their locations in the main article. I think Daechi station is the geographic nexus of the 4 dong? I'm too hanguled out for one day to double check. Deiz talk 12:22, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Divisions 
Talk:Hydrophobic effect

message: This page has a lot of rather specific information that needs to be referenced. M stone 22:34, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This is really common knowledge.  Tagging something as unreferenced is fine for someone who really doesn't know anything about the subject.  Please don't delete something just because you don't understand it. The charges go on the outside of the double helix and the hydrophobic aromatic base pairs are on the inside where they minimize contact with water. I have added a ref ("Basic Concepts in Biochemistry - A Student's Survival Guide by Gilbert, H.F." on page 9) that can be previewed on the Google books.  I hope that this reference satisfies your concerns.  M stone (talk) 19:34, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lacks references 

message: This article seems to be limited to biological effects. What about all the industrial applications, such as hydrophobic concrete (I am no expert, but there must be many other examples as well). --Remotelysensed (talk) 13:15, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Narrow scope?
Talk:Dong-Eui University

message: As an outcome of WP:Articles for deletion/Dong-eui Medical Center, I have blanked and redirected Dong-eui Medical Center to here. The previous content of that page, organisational details sourced only to its own webpage, can be found in its history. Felix QW (talk) 09:41, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dong-eui medical center
Talk:Safe Area Goražde

message: Some pages to help a man get going. Or a woman: God knows I'd love to have more around here. Hope they help! Good luck, lads. Snoutwood (talk) 06:14, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resources 

message: Any issues regarding Safe Area Gorazde telling only "one part of the story" should be backed up with some references. A judgement to the effect that it should "be read carefully" shouldn't be in a wikipedia article. Back up what you're saying - if you do that I've no problem.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.192.211.24 (talk) 20:42, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misrepresentation, etc. 

message: It has only the most fractional, tenuous, and threadbare relationship to the book.  I own and have read the book several times for its poignant story, and the "plot" section of this article does Sacco's honest reportage a great disservice by implying that the book is fiction. 100.6.81.19 (talk) 09:45, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who wrote the "plot" section? 

message: Safe Area Gorazde won an Eisner award in 2001, it is a verifiable fact, the end. Have a nice day. Too bad if you don't like it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.192.211.24 (talk) 13:52, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eisner award. 
Talk:Limerick Generating Station

message: The bit about the Emergency Generators really doesn't seem to fit for the header (too much like an advertisement?)
Some of that info might work if there was a section of the article more appropriate, but there isn't yet.  Any ideas?
Ngmweb (talk) 21:35, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Layout and Information

message: Here ist a photo of it: http://www.sxc.hu/photo/282897. It says "Usage: Royalty free, no restrictions" - so can we use it here? --81.173.190.182 06:19, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, I went to the site and got the picture. It looks great and goes with the flow of the article.-Andrew 19:04, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo
Talk:Howard Hendricks

message: I have made this change based on personal knowledge. I have known the subject all my life and my father was one of his best friends. I also have a printed order of service from 1953 for Calvary Independent Presbyterian Church (CIPC) listing Howard Hendricks as the pastor. CIPC was formed by members of Westminster Presbyterian Church who wished to call Hendricks as their first pastor, after he was rejected as a candidate by the local presbytery of the Southern Presbyterian Church. Hendricks served as pastor of CIPC until he returned to Dallas Theological Seminary to be a full time faculty member. After he left, CIPC called  another pastor, and shortly thereafter a small group left and formed McKinney Memorial Church (MMC). Hendricks was friends with the founders of MMC (among whom were my parents) and preached many times as a guest pastor, but he was never the pastor of MMC (now McKinney Memorial Bible Church.)
I don't have what Wikipedia would consider public evidence for this, but no evidence was provided for the statement in the original article. Both churches (CIPC-CBC and MMBC) are still in existence and they have phone numbers if anyone wants to check. 
As a passing note, almost anyone who has had a newspaper article published about them knows that the account of a person close to an event who has a good memory and/or keeps good records is far more reliable than the sloppy stuff that newspaper reporters turn out. I find the Wikipedia standards to be rather strange in this respect. Published biographers rely extensively on personal interviews. That Wikipedia seems to regard this as unacceptable for its biographies is just strange. Pflashman (talk) 03:20, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changed McKinney Memorial Church to Calvary Independent Presbyterian Church (now Calvary Bible Church) 

message: re: Calvary Presbyterian, not McKinney Memorial as his first pastorate. Howard Hendricks' official "remembering Dr. Hendricks" webpage, prepared by his family - supports and corroborates the statements above. 
http://www.dts.edu/read/howard-hendricks-prof/
Quoting that story, "After receiving his bachelor’s degree in 1946, Hendricks and his wife moved to Texas, where he enrolled in classes at DTS. After earning a Master of Theology degree in 1950, he planted a church in Fort Worth.
Though he was a pastor at Calvary Presbyterian, the words in 2 Timothy 2:2 stuck in his mind..."
re: sloppy reporting vs. first hand knowledge. YES I heartily agree! Publish it on recycled toilet paper and it becomes "FACT" in the eyes of Wikipedia. But know something by being there and observing it firsthand? Hah! Forgetaboutit...and you must again and again explain that "you were there" and what you are saying was common knowledge to all involved, even as you endure being questioned and criticized for "not providing citations" to support your "assertion". It almost makes Wikipedia not worth the effort...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by CoolBlueGlow (talk • contribs) 18:21, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  corroboration of your statement
Talk:Special Herbs + Spices Volume 1

message: The link is indeed commercial (Google ads) and had been spammed to over 50 articles before I removed half of them. (Note that the anon who added them added them to several other articles). I may remove the remaining ones pending a discussion at the Wiki Spam project. OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:49, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: External link removal
Talk:Uruguayan Invasion

message: Surely this is some sort of joke... It just seems too silly to be real.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 130.88.243.144 (talk • contribs) 07:33, May 23, 2006.
It's silly AND it's real.
Rar81 02:51, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Craig Walsh

message: Hi Eli n, I noticed you have removed the notability query tag, however you did not establish notability per WP:MUSIC. Could you possibly make clear which criterion Walsh meets in that policy that suggests her is notable enough for an article. Thanks. Rockpocket 06:46, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for replacing the tag, but perhaps i didn't make myself clear. At WP:MUSIC there is a list of 'achievements' (if you will) at least one of which musicians must be able to lay claim to for them to be considered notable enough to have their own wikipedia article. Walsh seems an impressive (and talented) guy, but it isn't clear to me in the article which of those criteria he meets. Would you mind checking them out and making it clear here. Otherwise, i'm afraid, the article will not last too long. Thanks again. Rockpocket 07:15, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Natural Docs

message: Simple, we don't need two articles about the same exact thing.  68.226.61.4 06:57, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge:  [[NaturalDocs]] into [[Natural Docs]]

message: It has gained popularity amongst ActionScript 2.0 developers because no other free documentation generator exists that fully supports ActionScript 2.0 and because it generates higher-quality output than similar generators that partially support the language, such as ROBODoc.
This phrase names another tool as a negative, (or comparatively worse) example. The output quality of other tools is highy subjective and a matter of taste. I think this comparision is unfair and at least the names of other tools should be removed here.
--Thuffir Hawat 09:22, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming other tools as negative examples 

message: The comment about a lack of documentation tools for ActionScript is incorrect I believe. 
There has been an Adobe tool available for some time now (ASDochttps://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Using+the+ASDoc+tool) which works with Javadoc-style comments to generate html documentation from source code. This tool is now Apache licensedhttp://flex.apache.org/about-licensing.html 89.197.45.90 (talk) 10:07, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccurate statement about ActionScript? 
Talk:Retail therapy

message: It may be helpful to mention that the term is ironic, denoting a disorder rather than a therapy. Readers who can work that out for themselves do not need this article at all.94.218.180.214 (talk) 08:53, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Irony

message: Retail therapy 161.8.94.22 (talk) 06:15, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Retail therapy
Talk:Andrew Lam

message: what is his height? Could he be under the entry for well-known short men? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.134.229.102 (talk • contribs) 07:17, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Australian cricket tour of South Africa 2006

message: This article needs serious work.
There isn't any structure, headings, links to other pages.
There needs to be more dates, more info on the Twenty20 match and more info on the tests and other ODIs. 
Please try to follow the format set out in the Cricket Portal.  Use this page as an example. I will help when I have time.--Spark.1.4 07:19, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Chrysler 1.8, 2.0 & 2.4 engine

message: The 2.0 L (1997 cc) version of the Neon engine, was the first offered. Production began in 1994 in Trenton, MI
also stated right below is...
Applications:
Dodge Neon/Plymouth Neon(1995-2000) 
Mitsubishi Eclipse(non-turboSOHC)(1990-1994) 
made in 94, used in 90?
I dont know about it
No.  It wasn't used in production until 1994 for the 1995 model year.
Jd physicist 21:08, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 2.0

message: I think this article might benefit from a discussion of the differences between engine controllers for the engines, as the the engines changed from the SBEC to NGC controllers in 2003, which changed some fundamentals of the engine such as the crank trigger wheel.
I don't have a lot of knowledge on this topic, but I think it would really add to the article. The 1995-2002 and 2003-2005 engines are totally incompatible due to the crank difference. 
neons.org has a lot of information on this topic.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.232.177.116 (talk) 20:51, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  SBEC vs. NGC engines 

message: The 2.4L engine did not make 440 ft-lbs. That's a little ridiculous and almost double the torque of the turbo engine. It's more in the range of 150-170 ft-lbs for sure.
174.85.253.243 (talk) 02:27, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  2.4
Talk:Tyson Mao

message: This article has been kept following this AFD debate. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:31, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: AFD debate

message: "just imagine how amazing Tyson would have been, had he not set eyes upon this world 8 weeks earlier than intended". OK, obviously joking, very funny, but should be removed. The addition of cousin Susan is from the same editor. Is that credible?
Blonkm 17:46, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  8 weeks 

message: Much of the info in this article is out of date. I am removing several lines such as "where his competition times are currently surpassed only by Leyan Lo, Rowe "the hat" Hessler, and Chris Krueger" which is no longer true, given that he is only 26th place in the world. Honestly, I would even debate whether he should have an article given his relative unimportance in the current speedcubing environment. But his beginner method and teaching Will Smith are probably noteworthy. Qinwamascot (talk) 01:46, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Out Of Date Info 

message: Just to get this straight, The person who edited this wiki should be familiarize himself/herself with the COPYRIGHT LAWS, that Rubiks.com belongs to Erno Rubik, and not Tyson Mao. Therefore, the Rubiks.com website should NOT be listed under Tyson Mao's name.
Instead it should be put under Erno Rubik's name!!!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.0.207.110 (talk) 06:23, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tyson Mao DOES NOT OWN Rubiks.com!!! 

message: See Talk:J. Kenji López-Alt for conversation re: Tyson Mao and Wursthall, this is the same person. Jooojay (talk) 08:17, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wursthall, San Mateo
Talk:Free Hat

message: I think tweek had an RPG, and not a Bazooka!
Hat McCullough is called a "serial murderer," when actually the correct terminology would be mass murderer; I say this because in the episode one of the protesters says that Hat was acting in self-defense, which leads me to believe he killed all of them at once, hence a mass murderer.  Maybe this could just be considered an incongruity, because without that comment one would probably assume he killed the babies separately.  Another answer could be that it just sounds funnier to say "serial murderer" rather than "mass murderer", and odds are not too many people noticed.
:The guy meant that he killed all those babies individually in self defence, not that he killed them all at once in self defence.  He's a serial killer, or what the guy in the audience would call a serial self-defender.  136.160.152.99 (talk) 17:53, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No he didn't, they refer to a gang of babies who supposedly "malliciously and unprovoked" attacked hat.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.132.241.201 (talk) 02:17, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have redirected this episode because it was comprised mainly of plot, and had little to no outside information on the episode. The workers who sculpted the article's efforts were not in vain, though. The episode's contents now exist identically in South Park Wiki. Just so you know. Wilhelmina Will (talk) 06:52, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect

message: The 'ref' to BASEketball seems a bit of a strech. Lots42 (talk) 21:17, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  BASEketball 

message: Isn't this some kind of ploy directed to the Free the West Memphis 3?138.192.78.134 (talk) 06:11, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Free Hat - West Memphis 3
Talk:Jeremy Hermida

message: How do you pronounce "Hermida"?
69.197.137.238 07:35, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've usually heard it pronounced Her-MEE-da. --Idont Havaname (Talk) 07:36, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciation
Talk:The Final Sacrifice

message: Ok. Mst3k is a funny show. In fact, i'm watching this movie's episode right now. But the "selected quotes section" is currently more closely approximating an out-of-order transcript of the hecklers' dialogue. I've removed the section from the article completely, archiving it at /mst3k. If anyone wants to take on the task of picking through the archiving and actually selecting quotes for the selected quotes section, be my guest. Shaggorama 07:35, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: mst3k Quotes

message: ROWSDOWER!
   ROWSDOWWWWERRRR! --Rostov 05:22, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: ROWSDOWER

message: This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB.
Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 06:23, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "needs infobox" tag 

message: The film is notorious, post-MSTK, for having some hammy acting, a draggy plot, and very low production values. This is something that is hard to get across in an objective encyclopaedia article, especially so in this case because the film seems to have made no impact on the world between its release and its appearance on MSTK. Did it have any kind of wide release? Was it ever shown on television? Are there any contemporary critical appraisals (e.g. in one of those [The Aurum Film Encyclopaedia|Aurum encylopaedias])? -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 13:08, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Critical reception
Talk:The Da Vinci Code/project talk

message: ===Infobox===
As I suggested I will put on an Infobox Book as a first stage. the edition details will be for first editions only though. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 08:19, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok I have done that now researching the first editions proved a little time consuming. The release details section is probably my next target. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 08:57, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Talk 

message: As I suggested I will put on an Infobox Book as a first stage. the edition details will be for first editions only though. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 08:19, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok I have done that now researching the first editions proved a little time consuming. The release details section is probably my next target. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 08:57, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox

message: Is this a stalled enterprise? :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 11:22, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Anyone else
Talk:Eshott Airfield

message: Not sure about this. It does not handle passenger traffic so the notion of "port" is maybe not relevant. They describe it as an airFIELD in the website and literature. Is it generically an "Airport" or is "field" more relevant in this case?  leaky_caldron 07:46, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Is it an Airport?