Talk:List of game engines

message: Someone should update it but I haven't edited Wikipedia in years and I'm scared of messing it up. 98.214.101.208 (talk) 06:41, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bork3D is listed as proprietary but the article says it changed to BSD (libre / open) 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of game engines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120304001531/http://www.cafu.de/features to http://www.cafu.de/features
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:29, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: When linking to a list of games created using an engine, use "56 games" as a link title instead of "List". 46.242.13.112 (talk) 22:17, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Alternatively, introduce a separate column with the number of games created using an engine; this is probably better as it will allow sorting. 46.242.13.112 (talk) 22:22, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: That's near impossible to keep up to date. -- ferret (talk) 22:29, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Display number of games created using an engine 

message: I am sorry to disturb but dosn't Defold now use Go (programming language). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikhail's Unieo (talk • contribs) 05:42, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Defolds change in language 

message: * What I think should be changed (format using ):  I would appreciate it if the following information was added to the Game Engine list table:
--whether the game engine is able to be used by 3rd-party independent developers/companies (for example, Unity allows external programmers to use their game engine for a price/percentage of sales etc.)
--current size/worth of the company/organization that owns the game engine
* Why it should be changed: The column "License" is helpful to have a basic overview on how each game engine's license works. Unfortunately, merely describing a license as "proprietary" does not describe whether a game engine is an exclusive internal game engine or if an external game developer(s) can make their own games with it. A new column for current Company Size/Worth helps keep track of the current impact of each game engine. I  have done a bit of research for a few of the (top (AKA first alphabetically listed) game engines and can add that information in if needed.
* References supporting the possible change (format using the "cite" button):
AnonyBanana (talk) 22:49, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: This isn't a change that can be implemented as an edit request. You'd have to supply the information you want changed for every single row. This is more a suggestion for shifting the table to a new format and would need consensus and someone willing to do that work. "Available to public" might be a worthwhile column, but I'd oppose a "company size/worth" column as drawing conclusions not necessarily supported. A huge company might have an engine that's barely used. -- ferret (talk) 23:58, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request