lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Roosevelt Academy

message: should criticism of woongoed not be placed on the woongoed wikipedia article, linked to that of the Roosevelt Academy?
I think it is important to make direct reference on the Roosevelt Academy site of the situation of the housing, provided by Woongoed, since students are required to live in these houses by the Roosevelt Academy (RA). It is also of vital importance as part of the Roosevelt Academy, since housing makes up a very important of what distinguished the RA from other universities in the Netherlands, at least this is what it claims. 
It claims to be the second, UCU first, campus in the Netherlands. This is certainly not true since the huge spread between the houses can hardly be called a campus. Especially since it is nothing more than a few houses. 
The RA does not seem to be interested much in the living conditions of the students, since students experience many problems with Woongoed, which the RA acknowledged. The RA wants the students to solve these problems themselves since the RA is still to dependent on Woongoed for the future. (Also admitted by the RA) The students have to depend on a housing affairs committee which does not take any actions at all. Generally students seem to consider the Housing Affairs Committe as too incompetent to be able to solve issues.
:I have deleted the paragraph for the moment: it consisted purely of (negative) opinions, without any objective source. I know student accomodations are sometimes poor, even new housing facilities, and I don't doubt that you're right, but Wikipedia is not a forum for activism. Sixtus 18:56, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You do not improve an article suffering from incorrect content by adding your own negative opinions! You have been doing exactly the same on nl.wiki and it does not help. You can balance the article by adding information about other rankings, for example, or remove vague POV qualifications like "prestigious" (which I have done now). A phrase like The Roosevelt Academy has always promoted itself as the best university in the Netherlands, which is clearly not the case. is inadmissable, since it contains 1) an attack on a statement for which no source is given (I don't believe RA has ever promoted itself as 'the best university' - of course, it promotes itself but so does any institution for higher eduction and 2) it contains your POV opinion. Sixtus 19:07, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Woongoed Middelburg

message: PLEASE check your spelling and grammar before editing the wiki page.  It is embarrassing to all students if you do not write well here!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.241.10.217 (talk) 00:01, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling and Grammar

message: Roosevelt Academy changed its name to University College Roosevelt two months ago. Could someone change the official title of this page?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bartzus (talk • contribs) 11:52, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name change
Talk:Mont Orford

message: I'm a new contributor here, and I kind of want to help out here.
I was thinking maybe we could add a little more on the mountain itself?Canswiss (talk) 02:27, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point. See Wikipedia:WikiProject_Mountains#Structure to see an outline of the way a mountain article should look. Thanks. Student7 (talk) 17:04, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  More on the mountain? 
Talk:Brading

message: This is no longer open to the public and the last I saw had a "For Sale" sign up.--Streona (talk) 11:48, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Morton Manor

message: "Brad", "bread", "braid"? Something else? Please add IPA (with citation of course) if possible.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:A62:1931:3D01:CF8F:74C2:6166:EA1A (talk) 05:10, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation?
Talk:Wilhelm Marr

message: What? No mention of Marr's "The Victory of Jewry over Germandom?" 131.252.181.168 22:46, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'd say the fact that Marr, as the so-called 'patriarch' of the anti-Semitic German movment of the late 19th century later *renounced* many of his earlier writings is particularly significant.
Something akin to 'the anti-Semites were worse than the Jews'?
See Lindemann, 'The Jew Accused', 1991 - Nylarathotep
: If you can find an actual source/cite for this, feel free to put it in the article; I know I'd love to see it. 96.231.128.111 (talk) 21:07, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Significant Omission 

message: This article currently says Marr only "popularized" the term, I thought I've seen it listed as him coining the term itself.Vikingsfan8 (talk) 08:42, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did Marr coin the term "antisemitism"? 

message: I've removed the antisemitism category template from Wilhelm Marr. It is not appropriate to tag individuals - even dead ones - with a Badge of shame.
Marr's "antisemitic" attitudes (later repudiated) and his importance in the history of antisemitism are clear from the lede and the article.
Antisemitism consists of philosophies, beliefs, policies and behaviours - not individuals.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Galerita (talk • contribs) 08:47, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The tag most certainly needs to be added. By your reasoning, Hitler wouldn't warrant the Antisemitism banner either.--FeralOink (talk) 17:08, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yellow badge of shame
Talk:Action selection

message: Need to disambiguate a bunch of links.
:Need to add a definition of `agent' from philosophy, as an actor.
Need to create hierarchical structure:
*symbolic reasoning / GOFAI physical symbol system hypothesis
*distributed 
* reactive planning
* other / hybrid
This will help bring in the history, but not as a separate subtitle.  
Need to make individual architectures into bullet points, not subsections.  Otherwise it will get too long.
--Joanna Bryson 22:49, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  to do  

message: Should any explicit game-theoretical Nash equilibrium calculation be included? Perhaps I'm missing something already there. 212.188.109.12 23:15, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not clear
Talk:Iotacism

message: "short close front rounded vowel /yː/"
:If it is short → /y/
:If it is /yː/ → it is long.
--Adolar von Csobánka (Talk) 23:00, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the word "short", as υ could be either short or long. I see no need to give both possibilities in the IPA transcription; "/y/" in itself does not specify anything about length. Vilĉjo (talk) 17:44, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I propose that we include examples of this phenomenon,so that readers,especially in English,will begin to understand the wherefore of the peculiar spelling of loan-words
such as Phoenix Φοινιξ or Greek Γραικος itself .
:The examples you mention are not of iotacism but of similar changes in late Latin and English pronunciations. The original Latin diphthongs ae and oe (which were used for αι and οι in Greek loanwords) became monophthongs /ɛː/ and /eː/ respectively in Late Latin, so phoenix and Graecus both ended up with a long e sound in English. Then, the English long e became /iː/ due to the great vowel shift. This is why we have /iː/ in the English words phoenix and Greek. Note that while φοίνιξ is indeed pronounced with /i/ in Modern Greek, Γραικός is pronounced with /e/ because αι, while it did smooth to a monophthong, did not take part in the shift to /i/. Iceager (talk) 00:33, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Examples
Talk:Fruiting body

message: I agree, the two articles should be merged, or perhaps added to the definition of mushroom, as part of a structure sub section.
:Fruiting body should have its own article - anything from a microscopic conidium to a large mushroom can be called a "fruiting body", as can fungus-like structures formed by slime molds and myxobacteria. A "mushroom" is simply a blanket term for a fungal fruiting body large enough to be seen by the naked eye. Peter G Werner 04:00, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that "Ascocarp" is a big enough subject that it deserves its own page, even if its kind of a small page now. Eventually it needs to be expanded to explain variations such as an apothecium, cleistothecium, etc. in more detail, plus how the overall shape of ascocarps is related to the way that asci release spores. If you want to merge ascocarp, it should be seen as a temporary thing, until the section on ascocarps gets large enough to be broken out into its own article. The same should be true of "Basidiocarp", which right now simply redirects to "Fruiting body" Peter G Werner 00:40, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree Ascocarp should be retained and I have started to move information from Ascomycota.Strobilomyces 19:17, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Since this consensus is pretty clear, I am going to remove the merge tag from the ascocarp article. Debivort 02:22, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

message: Please see the discussion at Talk:Sporocarp.
....  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.177.104.74 (talk) 02:44, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comprehensive plan for sporocarp/fruiting body articles
Talk:Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass

message: Um... the summaries start with chapter 5. where's 1-4? Vote4jr (talk) 03:06, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: They were removed, I've readded them. -- penubag  (talk) 04:40, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: This article is listed as level-5 vital article, and imho rightly so. Still, there is little activity, and it is still rated start-class, imho rightly so. There is another problem: Since Douglass wrote three autobiographies, having a very similar content for the first decades of his life, the articles on those autobiographies tend to be redundant. To solve both the problems of inactivity / manpower and of redundancy, I'd suggest to create an article "Autobiographies of Frederick Douglass", and merge the content of three articles.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Rsk6400 (talk • contribs) 19:56, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with other autobiographies ? 

message: I have read the reactions to the text part several times, the text appears on several other websites discussing the book and referencing the Norton critical edition. However, I've looked for this letter, bought the actual Norton book and cannot find any mention of the letter in question. The book simply says he published a response, but the letter itself is not present. Should we either remove this reference to the letter being in the book, or may someone else point out to me where exactly this letter in in the book?
Edward Liu 323 (talk) 06:22, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd say, if you have the book, just correct the text and give a reference with the exact page number where letter and response are mentioned. --Rsk6400 (talk) 06:46, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  The thing is, I guess I should've pointed this out sooner, the letter itself is not IN the book, it is simply claiming that Douglass responded to the letter, with no evidence backing up the claim that he did, or indeed that such a letter even existed in the first place! Thus, despite this exact paragraph being repeated in several different places online, I question if it's even wise to have it in the article in the first place? 
2600:1700:8490:8460:1849:5ABD:37D2:B758 (talk) 14:13, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reactions to the Text Source 

message: This section of the article is dense with field-specific jargon, and is inaccessible to most readers. I’m far from qualified to revise the section, but I wanted to flag it so that someone with expertise in the field can revise how the article presents this important aspect of Douglass’s work. 2600:8800:9C04:B00:A048:67E3:7169:F7EA (talk) 00:04, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Influence on Contemporary Black Studies
Talk:Dragon Quest Swords

message: Shouldn't this be Dragon Quest Swords: The Masked Queen and the Tower of Mirrors --> AND instead of AT.  jaco♫plane 10:47, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have the press release in front of me, and yes, it should. --Codemonkey 03:19, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: Is this game simply "similar" to Kenshin Dragon Quest, or is it a port? 71.203.209.0 04:27, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: According to everything I've read, including IGN's speculation, this will NOT be a port of Kenshin Dragon Quest. Rather, it will feature similar gameplay mechanics. --Tristam 01:02, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Kenshin Dragon Quest

message: Based on what descriptions we have so far of the gameplay, Dragon Quest Swords doesn't sound much like an RPG to me. 71.203.209.0 00:50, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The problem lies with defining "RPG." Many don't consider Final Fantasy to be a true RPG, since everything (stats, storyline, character personalities, etc.) is predetermined. I think that, for now, Dragon Quest Swords roughly falls in the console role-playing game genre. We'll have to wait for more details till we revise. --Tristam 00:53, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: it's not an rpg, ign.com dosn't mark it as an rpg, i changed it to "First-person adventure" the only thing really that comes close to an rpg element is the leveling system--Sabu99 10:36, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Role-playing game?

message: Please do not delete the North American date that has been recently posted. It was also confirmed by Square Enix -- that they would be releasing the game on February 28, 2008. Thank you -- Zeta26 17:46, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Confirmed Date
Talk:Turnpike Trusts (Britain)

message: I have written a short article becuae I think one is needed.  However there is a longer account of the subject as a section in toll roads.  I would suggest that that section should be moved here and merged with what I have written, leaving a much shorter account of the subject under the toll roads article with its international coverage.  Peterkingiron 23:10, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Turnpike trust seems a fuller article - suggest this is redirected to there D22 21:41, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Scott Tenorman

message: Shouldn't this page be deleted? I think that Scott Tenorman should be moved to a list of South Park Characters.
Don't get me wrong, Scott Tenorman must die was a funny episode, but Scott Tenorman should be on a list. --66.218.28.217 04:55, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wasted page?
Talk:Quiggly hole

message: This should have a native/First Nations category, I'm just not sure which one.Skookum1 23:14, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Categories?

message: The current photos are fine illustrations for an article on earth-houses. However, the article is on holes: the evidence of the buildings that are absent, so the photos are not illustrating the kekuli/'quiggly' holes at all. One would be great to show what the hole indicates, but the rest should go to the articles on underground houses, and there is still a need for some clear photos that indicate how a kekuli/quiggly differs from, say, the root-bowl hole of fallen trees, or other natural depressions. Protozoon (talk) 19:22, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Illustrations

message: A syilx student in my class INLG 380 added this information that she learned in her degree program at the University of British Columbia Okanagan, where these pithouses were traditionally made. This word and it's etymology is included in Anthony Mattina's dictionary of the language. CESchreyer (talk) 04:47, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding Interior Salish origins of the term
Talk:Adam Virgo

message: 'strength of character and unfettered dedication' is just one example of the extensive POV problems with this article. Cynical 23:16, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Shinnecock Indian Nation

message: These are outdated and of questionable reliability, given improved linguistic and DNA research into Indian tribes.--Parkwells (talk) 16:09, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs more sources

message: I found the info, now one of you wiki fanboys needs to pretty it up!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.236.86.114 (talk) 23:58, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: WOOT! They won some kind of court case!!!

message: Considering there is no casino, I removed most of the discussion about it and just left a general statement that one was proposed. -Uyvsdi (talk) 00:20, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Casino proposals
Talk:Est

message: I would like to see this page merged with the upper case, page, due to 90% of the meanings commonly used are in both upper and lower, and it will save double linking. --Amckern 03:28, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?

message: There was a book called EST that was about the environmental tipping point being reached if humans did not change course.
I read it in the early eighties, but have no other information at this time.
NantucketNoon 09:55, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  EST- Book
Talk:Biddy Early

message: this was my first wikipedia article to submit! exciting!!
please edit and discuss any changes that should be made. i know there is a lot of uncertainity about what happened to her son and how she got her bottle, so not much is mentioned about that..
:It might be improved if you add some references and work on style issues. I'll try to find the time to come back and help.Trilobitealive 04:46, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: 13:09, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Anectdote removed from article

message: I've just completed a major cleanup of this article.  I mainly worked toward giving it an encyclopedic tone (and have therefore removed the "essay-like" tag), but also fixed mechanics and formatting (including citations) and added a few internal links.  There are several place names that I think might be worthy of at least stub-class articles, but I didn't add the red links because I'm not sure whether the places are notable enough or not.  The most pressing issue (as usual) is the references.  There are several very nice references cited at the end of the article, but without inline citations there is no way to know what information came from where, not to mention what information doesn't have any reliable source at all.  If this one problem could be fixed by someone with knowledge of the cited books, I think this could be a really nice article.  Please feel free to contact me if I can be of any further assistance. -- edi(talk) 07:42, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like you've taken the time to improve this article a lot.Trilobitealive (talk) 00:10, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: I attempted to improve the footnote added by an anonymous editor on Jan 9, 2012 that takes issue with the April 1874 death date in the Old age and death section. Being unfamiliar with Biddy's life and not having the time to research the issue, I am leaving further clarification to other editors. Eric talk 21:20, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of Biddy's death 

message: I altered the map coordinates for Dromore such that they correspond to the townland near Feakle rather than the woodland amenity north of Ennis.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.79.55.162 (talk) 17:37, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map Locations
Talk:Sweyn Haakonsson

message: Some sources which mention Sveinn. Haukur 23:22, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: The article on Sveinn is quite interesting. The guy claims that the Svein referred to in the relevant skaldic poems is in fact Sweyn I of Denmark. He has to reinterpret them a bit to reach this conclusion, for example he believes that Olav Haraldsson did not in fact win the battle of Nesjar, but was defeated by Sweyn I of Denmark in that battle. He believes that the relevant poems were misinterpreted by the people writing Historia Norvegiae and the other books in the late 12th centuries. At the same time, he totally discounts the existence of oral traditions besides the skaldic poems. It all seems a bit far-fetched to me, but the guy is a professor of the university of Stockholm (of nordic languages), so I thought it should be mentioned. --Barend 15:27, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: About Staffan Hellberg's claim
Talk:John Campbell, 1st Earl of Breadalbane and Holland

message: I've edited this section because it simply perpetuates an ancient-and groundless-myth.  Neither Breadalbane nor Argyll had any direct part in the Massacre of Glencoe.  Breadalbane was proud of his own efforts to secure a peace in the Highlands, and only too well aware how serious a setback the Massacre was.  He did not 'seize' the Glencoe lands for the simple reason that these lands belonged to the Argyll estate, to whom Macian paid rent.  Breadalbane's shocked reaction to the Massacre can be readily explored in the corrsepondence held by the Scottish Record Office.
Rcpaterson 23:30, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Breadalbane and Glencoe.
Talk:Cylon God

message: It is never specifically stated that the "Cylon God" is the God of all Cylons. This is cast in doubt by the coversation between Caprica Cavil and Fleet Cavil when they were incarcerated in the brig. For all we know, the Cylon God is merely a figment of Baltar's imagination; the conversations he has had with the Internal Six may indicate nothing more than his being delusional. -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. Think out loud 23:42, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  A few comments... 

message: Surely this tiny article should be merged into the main Cylon article?David 21:10, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose: Why should it? --SGCommand (talk • contribs) 21:12, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Comment: Because it's barely a stub. My opinion is that it doesn't require a separate article and would be better off inside the main Cylon article (although I was surprised there was no separate section on religion in that article). The second paragraph is a tautology (it amounts to "the monotheistic Cylon faith is like other monotheistic faiths because it's monotheistic"), and more than half of the third paragraph has nothing to do with the Cylon God, instead being about the Lords of Kobol. David 21:25, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Support: Basically, the points that David made are the points I would've made a well. -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. Think out loud — WP:PORN BIO? 04:39, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Comment: it looks good the way it is --SGCommand (talk • contribs) 09:01, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Comment: No offense SGCommand, but as the creator and main contributor, you might be a bit biased. There are no solid facts on the Cylon God because the producers haven't given us any, and until there's enough information for more than one paragraph (the second and third being redundant for the reasons above) I can't see any reason to keep this article. The Cylon God is a product of Cylon society (as far as we know) and any facts on the subject (and Cylon religion in general, which as I've said seems a bit lacking) would make a good addition to the main Cylon article. David 09:32, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: New Comment: In that case, do it--SGCommand (talk • contribs) 09:39, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge?