lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Martin of Aragon

message: I find it common on Wikipedia, to see small paintings or photos, etc., accompaning the article, but on most occasions they will not automatically enlarge as is promised!69.92.23.64 (talk)Ronald L. Hughes  —Preceding undated comment added 20:52, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just how does one expand or enlarge the painting of Martin of Aragon? 

message: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonio_Ballester
It would seem any connection should go both ways?69.92.23.64 (talk)Ronald L. Hughes  —Preceding undated comment added 20:56, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is there no connection to this site here? 

message: from here http://www.glossa.fi/mirator/pdf/Morris.pdf
In 1410, when Martin died, apparently of a lethal combination of
serious indigestion and uncontrollable laughter, no successor had been
properly designated, initiating a crisis of succession
appears like this 
apparently from a lethal combination of indigestion and uncontrollable laughter[3]
James Michael DuPont (talk) 04:17, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I reworded the sentence a bit and the article looks good compared to it. I ran some Google searches on other text as well, with no copyvios found.--NortyNort  (Holla) 10:22, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  copy and paste
Talk:Offensive tackle

message: It seems strange how the Guard (American football) article is so good, while this one is really bad.
I'm not that knowledgeable about football but a recent book, "The Blind Side: Evolution of a Game", sheds light on how critical this position can be.
I removed ", except on rare trick plays." Interior offensive lineman are allways ineligible receivers. The only time that they are eligible is when they line up as an end, and the referee has been notified. --Rushingfn 20:15, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's not entirely accurate to say that a tackle must line up "as an end" in order to be eligible.  They simply must be uncovered on the end of the line, i.e., there is no end on their side of the line.  They're still lined up as a tackle.  In fact, in that circumstance they're specifically referred to as a "tackle eligible", which stands in literal contradiction to the claim that tackles are "always ineligible." -- Trowbridge (talk) 04:29, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Relatively poor

message: Removed the merge tag since there was no disucssion as to why we would remove an article discussiong a position into an article discussing an action in American Football. PsYoP78 18:05, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of merge tag

message: Why does this article have the "original research or unverified claims" tag attached?  There's absolutely nothing in this article that suggests "original research".  All information given in the article is basic common knowledge among anyone who has ever played football. --
Trowbridge (talk) 04:51, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Original research?

message: Merged into Tackle (American football)#Offensive tackle. 69.3.72.9 (talk) 15:09, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge September 2010
Talk:Acireale

message: I notice that the image gallery has been removed. I wish there had been a discussion here prior to the removal. However, I have restored one of the images, which illustrates the Baroque architecture for which the city of Acireale is famous.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 09:57, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Images

message: The history section looks good.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 09:59, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: History
Talk:Ocean City High School

message: I heard that rumor about my junior high too further inland.  Not true at all.  Anyway, I don't think Red Raiders should be redirected to this school, since Texas Tech University is better known as the Red Raiders.  Could someone fix this with a disambig? --DodgerOfZion 20:23, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Don't be silly 

message: Press of Atlantic City wrote https://pressofatlanticcity.com/news/breaking/ocean-city-high-school-struggles-with-suicide-related-issues/article_e645e4fc-7c52-11e5-9245-d3b5a01fd6b2.html
WhisperToMe (talk) 06:23, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suicide issue? 

message: Found this https://ocnjdaily.com/o-c-school-district-discusses-3-year-high-school-option/ but I wonder if Press of Atlantic City is a better source WhisperToMe (talk) 22:39, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Three year option?
Talk:Cahiers du Cinéma

message: Was Rohmer Cahiers' first editor? I'd always heard that Bazin was and that Rohmer took over after Bazin's death. --Jeremy Butler 12:31, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  First editor? 

message: I am moving this line from the Young Turks disambig page, as there is no mention of this phrase at the target article here. perhaps with some research this can be added:
*Young Turks, a group of critics and directors associated with the French New Wave, in particularly those associated with Cahiers du cinéma during the late 1950s and early 1960s.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 01:21, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Was this phrase used?

message: Is the second "c" in the title supposed to be capitalized? The article title doesn't do it and neither does the french Wikipedia. However, the article text does capitalize it. The Harvard Film Studies translation also capitalized it. One would presume that since this is a publication it would be in titlecase rather than Wikipedia's sentence-case preference for titles. Whichever we choose, the title should be consistent throughout. Opencooper (talk) 13:25, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: We should capitalize the "cinema" portion of the title. The magazine itself capitalizes it that way. When we change it, we must update references to this article too. Prad Nelluru (talk) 04:49, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  following WP:PROPERNOUN, WP:UE. – Fayenatic London 17:01, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalization consistency 

message: I'm adding additional material to the History section of the page, with the intent of clarifying and expanding greatly upon the page's recounting of the early history of the magazine. Douglas Firs (talk) 19:40, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page Additions
Talk:Ram

message: I am finding that there are alot of names that are Ram.  There is no page on this disamb page that tells me anything about it.  Im just gonna make a new apge called Ram(name) and we can go from there, as i am working on fixing the disamb page.
Bearingbreaker92 14:52, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't worry, normally it should be used on your talk page but I don't think anyone will complain if you're asking a real question and not misusing the tool ;). For your question, be bold and go ahead! If anyone disagrees with you, he can discuss it on this talk page. If you need further help, please don't hesitate to post on my talk page or to put  followed by your question on this page. -- lucasbfr talk 16:36, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ram (name)

message: Very nobile strong willed animals! Animals not just rams but all of them should be treated respectfully. Animal Lover 101 --74.130.36.9 (talk) 18:02, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  RAM  

message: The sports teams are Rams, not Ram, therefore they are duplicating what is at Rams. I propose that we move all the sports teams to Rams (removing any duplicates), and add Rams here as a See also. --Jameboy (talk) 00:32, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Clarityfiend (talk) 00:31, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sports teams 

message: Hi, I am planning to move the uses of the acronym RAM to a separate location (it's like this on a number of other wikis, e.g. sv:RAM vs. sv:Ram). Any objections? <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 01:52, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: , no one has disagreed in almost a year with your proposed split.  I am going to take the tag off the section, if you want to split it, go for it.  -- GB fan 11:49, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Nah, not needed really. <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 02:37, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate [[RAM (disambiguation)]] page
Talk:History of Turkey (disambiguation)

message: Is it a land? Is it a nation? Is it A race? help me out...--OttomanReference 07:02, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I see, either way it is a touchy subject. If we make it turks we're excluding some people but geographically would have to increase the scope. I'd go for the land concept. It'd be interesting to have a histoey of the predecessor states and empires leading to the modern republic of turkey. Feasible? Also on Template_talk:Timeline_of_History_of_the_Ottoman_Empire I had left a note on the links which you just changed back. --Dschwen 07:18, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: What is Turkey?

message: The concept is not as clear cut as HISTORY OF X. As the terminology has been used for very different concepts. It is better to keep the page as it is designed. --OttomanReference 00:01, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  History of Turkey?
Talk:Takehito Harada

message: I think this artist really deserves a proper article rather then a stub. However I have had trouble finding interviews or any information about him. His home site is very bare in regards to personal bio of him.
My knowledge of Japanese is on a very basic level, so maybe someone who it pretty fluent in it could send him an e-mail with request on some biographycal information? 
Pavel Elagin 12:46, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Artist biography/interview? 

message: This article has what appears to be plagiarism. The entire introduction was copied word for word from . I don't really know what should be done here, but for now I'll just put it as a reference. I hope someone more knowledgeable of this site's policies can come along and fix it for good. 71.127.255.6 (talk) 02:45, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagiarism? 

message: Plenair is not real people. It just a fictional characters.--Woad85 (talk) 00:00, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plenair is Real Person. 
Talk:Hydroboration–oxidation reaction

message: I'm thinking of adding to the "Isolation of Borane Reagents" section that BH3 is commercially available as a THF or Diethylether solution. Any objections? --P D L 12:42, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The mechanisms part mentions that; I don't see a separate section on borane reagents - at least as the article is now.  Good idea to include it if there is, though. Walkerma 03:25, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

message: The hydrogen, since it is hydridic, should have the negativ partial charge. But it is on the boron atom. Must be corrected! 79.233.53.38 (talk) 02:48, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Transition state

message: The notion that this reaction is anti-Markovnikov is a little silly. Because Markovnikov's rule is taught in the undergraduate context of hydrating alcohols, you end up with the assumption that it refers to where the hydroxyl ends up. This isn't the case, as is obvious from the actual statement of the rule: it's a question of where the cation ends up, and that's at the more stabilized location. In hydroboration, the cation ends up at the more stabilized location; unlike in straight-up hydration or in oxymercuration-demercuration, the first reagent to add contains a hydride; as such, the cation gets itself a hydrogen, the less substituted position gets the boron, and the rest is history.
I think this bears clarification both here and at Markovnikov's rule.
Everyday847 (talk) 02:21, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Your concern sounds more general than this particular reaction (or at least if the rule itself is redescribed, other reactions' articles that also behave the same as hydroboration–oxidation may have to be altered). So let's keep the discussion on the central point, at Talk:Markovnikov's rule#Claim that hydroboration-oxidation is anti-Markovnikov, for now. I responded there. DMacks (talk) 03:22, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Claim that hydroboration-oxidation is anti-Markovnikov
Talk:Rajasthani language

message: Shouldn't this article be merged with Rajasthani language? I think, this title here (with the plural -s) is more appropriate. — N-true 13:00, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes please merge Goldenrowley 23:43, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Rajasthani language]]? 

message: I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: The Turner, Platts, Tisdall and Masica all have harv errors.There is no bibliograph section for the sfn cites to link to.
 scope_creepTalk 15:57, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Feedback from New Page Review process
Talk:Dragonheart: A New Beginning

message: This article still needs a huge amount of cleaning. I got rid of the final section - as it was completely uncyclopaedic - suggesting for readers to visit google and search for images hardly has place in a encyclopaedia article. The whole thing continues to read like a synopsis. Is it work fixing? Or should it get a rewrite? I'll link it to the Dragonheart page as well - maybe it can get some more traffic. If I get the time soon, I'll clean it up myself. Lochok 12:44, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the section. After some google searching, I couldn't find any source for it at all, and the only numbers I could find were significantly higher (Though outside RS) AnsFenrisulfr (talk) 03:55, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Femina

message: * Support: Both articles are about the same topic. Data is being duplicated. I support merger of Femina (magazine) into this article. -Ambuj Saxena (talk) 12:50, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger of [[Femina]] and [[Femina (magazine)]]

message: Since there are two "Femina" magazines, I suggest that this page be converted to a disambiguation page with links to both magazines as Femina magazine (India) and Femina magazine (Indonesia). — Ambuj Saxena (talk) 12:32, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Support. They are two entirely different magazines and deserve separat pages.Gamesmaster G-9 17:44, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Splitting article
Talk:National Gospel Singing Convention

message: This article should be removed completely. The event mentioned hasn't even happened yet! If someone would like this article to be worked on, either a)drop me an e-mail to MArkenberg@yahoo.com and I'll get on it, or b)work on it yourself! Anyone else think it should be trashed?
::67.52.221.60 12:50, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Remove this article?

message: Well not an article, but a request!
:You folks need to have an article on the National Gospel Singing Convention. The 71st annual session will be in Lawrenceburg, Tennessee in 2006, 17th and 18th on November. Plenty of places to get information on about it. The Vaughan museum is not mentioned by your organization, nor is there much about Lawrenceburg, Tennessee, the birthplace of Southern Gospel Music. I guess this is just a very broad based, general vague information center, and not very detailed for specific information.
Contributed by User:66.38.41.243
To which my response is "please join in, and contribute/improve articles so thaat Wikipedia is not longer a general vague information center!" Cje 09:19, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Original article
Talk:Honey, I Shrunk the Kids: The TV Show

message: Am I missing something? What network was this on? --98.232.180.37 (talk) 10:20, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Network??
Category talk:Parody films

message: Parody's they left out:"Shawn of the dead","Shriek: if you know what i did last friday the thirteenth","Club Dread"and duh,"Not another teen movie".
How cuold you forget those.Espesualy "Not another teen movie".
Oh yeah and there's "Spy Hard"and there's "soul Plaine".—Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.114.162.188 (talk • contribs) 
We didn't forget Not Another Teen Movie. Look under 'N'.--Fallout boy 12:38, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Ted White (author)

message: Image is on the left because of a basic design principle: Figure is on left, looking right. Pepso 13:04, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Deleted "mal-evolution" before the word "novel," to describe Phoenix Prime.  There was no citation to explain what "malevolution" is supposed to mean, and more important, it's just an unnecessary non-word.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.87.54.170 (talk) 04:46, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "mal-evolution"? 

message: I have commenced a tidy-up of the Bibliography section. Cite templates will be used for books and articles, as well as tables for organising short stories, poems and/or book reviews. Capitalization and punctuation follow standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, as much as Wikipedia templates allow it. ISBNs and other persistent identifiers, where available, are commented out, but still available for reference. Links to potentially unreliable digitised copies may be removed. This is a work in progress; feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 06:31, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography
Talk:Tissue culture

message: can i know more about tissue culture thank you
------
I've slightly revised the page to provide a strong link to cell culture. It may be worth merging the two pages based on the common modern use of tissue culture, but technically it does better encompass the processes of organ culture and explant culture than cell culture does.
Dr Aaron 06:41, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've just reverted a long "how to" guide for several reasons:
* It was written in a "how to" procedural style, rather than an encyclopedic style. 
* It is largely redundant with material on the cell culture page, plus the material largely referred to mammalian cell culture practices so it should go on the cell culture page.
* The whole section was in my opinion overly detailed for a page which has scant detail on the reasons for and the types of tissue culture. Perhaps this information could go on new page cell culture procedures or cell culture practices? 
Dr Aaron 04:16, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "how to" section

message: what is connection of tissue cluter and cloning in the evolution of life  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.147.16.77 (talk) 11:16, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  what is tissue culture in connection to evolution of life 

message: I think that some mention should be made of Cellular agriculture and tissue engineering. MaynardClark (talk) 20:48, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cellular agriculture 

message: Nothing Creative lula (talk) 10:13, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sg 

message: Hii 2409:4064:2C84:55CA:0:0:7A4A:9F05 (talk) 01:57, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Type of tissue culture 

message: Tissue culture 190.108.215.39 (talk) 18:34, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Integrated science 

message: Hello 
I am Waddah from uskudar university, I have got a project on my masters program to edit this page, aiming to get your help and make the page better.
best regards
Waddahsalama (talk) 05:49, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing tissue culture page  

message: It's a Tissue culture 223.182.0.65 (talk) 15:48, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tissue culture
Talk:Project English

message: Certainly the series of language textbooks by Tom Hutchinson (English teacher), used throughout the 90s in elementary schools all over the Europe, carry more cultural and societal significance than an obscure recording of juvenile tribal war-chanting? Shouldn't there be a disambiguation page, at the very least?
Yours truly, a random passer-by 78.45.161.99 (talk) 15:14, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Significance?
Talk:Layer 2 MPLS VPN

message: :I did re-write it considerably, and removed the  tag from the main page. That does mean that I took out the explanation of FEC, which I just didn't have time to go into right now. Also, the list of companies supprting L2 MPLS VPNs is just a partial list.--Diogenes00 04:58, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Adulis

message: This Adulis article has hardly any sources. People need to start posting sources, otherwise, no point in adding your inputs.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by EriPeople (talk • contribs) 13:43, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article has virtually no sources 
Talk:Ayalon Valley

message: Why is the title Ajalon not Ayalon?  Its a Y sound not a J sound! Jon513 13:32, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: naming

message: I think the article should be split into the Biblical town of Ajalon and the Valley of Ayalon, which is as much a modern location as it is Biblical, and deserves its own article. -- Ynhockey (Talk) 07:11, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This article is mostly abandoned and I don't think you will find any controveries here.  Frankly I perfer editing those article - it give you free reign to make it how you see fit.  If you want to split it, or edit it, or do anything to make it better (find some source besides the Jewish Encyclopedia!) go for it. Jon513 21:31, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a possibility, however, they would both be small stubs. Eric Wester 15:09, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

text: I was about to boldy split, but I noticed no precedent at he:עמק איילון, and I wondered if there wasn't some other organisational system in play there that we should replicate here... TewfikTalk 08:56, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Split

message: I've included two sentences from the third paragraph of the Ajalon article below for context.  I think the second sentence is very confusing and should be revised for readability by someone who is familiar with the details:
These could have been the two eclipses at the beginning of Joshua's reign. The first one was a lunar eclipse, right above the Valley of Ajalon and the rugged western horizon, at the moon was still eclipsed when reaching the horizon, its middle about an hour before sunrise on December 22, 1471 BCE, with a magnitude of 1.28 or 128%.
Thanks!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.111.130.108 (talk) 00:00, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  revision request