lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:St. Pius X High School (Houston)

message: I have updated and added some new information to this page as of October 12, 2018.  Some information was out of date regarding TAPPS districting and athletics in general.  Some information was incorrect, including school colors and historical information.
There have been flags posted here about the tone of the language and the lack of citations on some material included here.  The tone claims have not been substantiated by any real evidence to date, and thus have been dismissed pending clarification.  A flag was also posted regarding the lack of citations for the historical information.  This is incorrect, given that citation to the written sources of the information is not possible.  This information was taken from the 1959 and '60 editions of Del Sarto, as well as from newsletters sent to alumni by St. Pius in the 1980s.  The information is correct, though, and to date, there has been no substantiated challenge to its veracity.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by CarlosKorea (talk • contribs) 03:10, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion of the article
Talk:The Village School (Houston)

message: Victuallers 12:42, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

message: There is an article from a Vietnamese-language publication  (from Vietnam itself) about the head of the school:
* "Học sinh quốc tế tại Trường The Village sẽ được chăm sóc chu đáo" (Archive). Doanh nhân cuối tuần. 18 March 2015. Print: 20 March 2015. - PDF version (Archive)
Google Translate says it talks about international students
WhisperToMe (talk) 20:54, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vietnamese source 

message: This page incorrectly states that Bill Delbrugge has been the Head of School since 2018. He's actually been serving in the role since 2021, succeeding Katherine Brewer (who was appointed in 2018). Psg2022 (talk) 00:34, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect Content About Head of School
Talk:Generalized scale-free model

message: The contents of this article appear to be like a hoax. I might be wrong, though. Anyone passing by, please review the article and put your opinion here. -- 0612 (talk) 02:48, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your attention to this article. -- 0612 (talk) 02:57, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  The article seems to be ok, you can find general information and (online) sources at other wikipedia artciles on scale free networks.--Kmhkmh 21:20, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Suspected Hoax

message: I've done some tidying & rephrasing for clarity, but I can't for the life of me make the first math markup under Examples work.  Eithin 19:29, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Math markup broken
Talk:Hun School of Princeton

message: Could someone explain why athletics is ahead of facilities? It seems inappropriate and out of order. LCO6 (talk) 17:27, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Organization 

message: The introduction of this article needs to be cleaned up. It shouldn't be a collection of quotes. Bgold4 02:48, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: i attended Hun and Ethan Hawke never graduated from there, he attended for a while and switched schools due to drama caused by him dating one of the Dean's daughters and the Dean not approving. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.10.59.65 (talk) 01:52, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ethan Hawke 

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://www.hunschool.org/hun-at-a-glance/history-and-mission/index.aspx. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Martey (talk) 13:46, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: Please don't capitalize all the words.
Please use possessive punctuation.
As an example: it's not "Girls Softball," it's "girls' softball."
Thanks.
Julietdeltalima (talk) 14:18, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sports formatting
Talk:Westbury Christian School

message: Most of this article is plagiarised from the school website. Much of the lead and accreditation section comprise material taken from the History section of the school website, while the Life in 3D section takes material from the 3 Dimension section. The account User talk:Westbury10420 that added most of the material to the page appears to be involved in the school in some manner. IrishStephen (talk) 23:41, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taken directly from the school website 

message: https://arcweb.hcad.org/parcelviewer/ says its subdivision is "Fondren Southwest" though I'm unsure which subdivision it is exactly.
WhisperToMe (talk) 20:49, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location
Talk:Frank Pellegrino (actor)

message: He should NOT be confused with the infamous American Communist, the late Frank A. Pellegrino. John celona 23:15, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Not Communist
Talk:Dark Nebula (Kirby)

message: Would be nice. A pic could also show the simarilarities between Dark Zero and Dark Matter/ 0. DeathGodDragon EDGE 02:51, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: A Pic...

message: I don't think a one time villian from the Kirby Series (KSqSq wasn't that great or noteworthy) really deserves its own article. Merge with Kirby: Squeak Squad? Jai Soun 22:44, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?
Talk:The Swan (TV series)

message: Why was it terminated? 71.208.167.138 20:09, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why was it terminated? 
Talk:Named-entity recognition

message: another commonly used name is entity extraction Josh Froelich 02:53, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: The XML tags (<ENAMEX> etc.) in the examples, especially the first one, serve more to confuse than to clarify. First, not everyone is familiar with the notation. Second, they add lots of visual noise. Finally, this seems a lot like an implementation detail. Surely we can do better with text formatting?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.245.127.69 (talk) 14:22, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I just fixed this. The XML was quite distracting. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 12:21, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  XML Tags in Examples 

message: Is it worth including a para on eval of NER systems? Covering e.g. strict vs lenient matching, and precision & recall & fscore (w/links to main articles) Leondz (talk) 12:32, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I just added a short paragraph on evaluation. Feel free to jump in; it focuses on F1 score for strict matching, and it needs references. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 14:27, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evaluation
Talk:Klashnekoff

message: I have no idea what I'm talking about. I'd appreciate it if a fan could improve this page.
Cheers Powelldinho 02:55, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help needed 

message: Why is there a passage on it's murda??? This could be on a page about violence related to hip hop, but not on klashnekoff's encyclopdia page, and those particular lyrics are in no way violent, most of the line is metaphorical, and this can be proved when as explicitly says RHYMES. This kind of metaphore is often used by rappers in lyrics to say they are better than the other person.
"I'm not ready to die but ever ready for bury a guy They're not ready for I I can see the fear in they eye Scared of the rhymes that ricochet and tear them inside N fear for they lives"
This passage is also an awful representation of what the section is trying to portray, let me highlight a bit.
"Scared of the rhymes that ricochet and tear them inside"
I hope this shows that he is taking about his "rhymes" and not any kind of violence. Also this passage should only be used if somebody with significance has explictly related these lyrics to violence, with a reference. But I should delete it now.
joshsiret  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.8.138.110 (talk) 18:25, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unencyclopedic 
Talk:Fort Selden

message: One of the reasons the American military needed greater presence in this region was to police illegal activities by American settlers, traders, and filibusters who were moving through the lawless neutral zone into Texas, squatting on land illegally, inciting unrest in Indian tribes, and engaging in guerrilla raids against the Spanish. Despite repeated declarations by the American government that such activity was forbidden, little was done to curb it. American military forces at the south-west frontier were insufficient and poorly equipped, and their leaders, who mostly favoured an American invasion of Spanish dominions in the hopes of conquering Texas and even Cuba, were disinclined to police the situation except when specific orders were given. When the Spanish pushed back against the incursionists, exaggerated claims of an imminent Spanish invasion of American territory would become the stuff of public agitation, and worse, of the advice of American military leaders to their superiors.Middleton, H.F., Frontier outpost : a history of Fort Jesup, Louisiana, 1822-1846. 1973: [Baton Rouge, La.]Hardin, J.F., Fort Jesup, Fort Selden, Camp Sabine, Camp Salubrity: Four forgotten frontier army posts of western Louisiana (first installment). The Louisiana Historical Quarterly, 1933. 16(1): p. 5-26.
CactusPolecat (talk) 22:33, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: This article needs greater balance
Talk:Text simplification

message: you might want to consider defining text simplification and some of its major concepts and perhaps offer some examples as well as suggest some of the other names of this process Josh Froelich 02:56, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Added an example (there could be better examples available) Amanbhatia 06:11, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Gaziantep

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure) ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 09:56, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Gaziantep →  – While 'Gaziantep' is more common, the other Turkish provinces with a honorific, Şanlıurfa and Kahramanmaraş are listed under their plain names Urfa and Marash. For consistency, Gaziantep should be moved to Antep too. – anlztrk (talk) 08:32, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 14 February 2023 

message: Nevermind, ignore this section of talk. I have changed my mind about adding anything. Islamoihsanrealtor-com (talk) 13:30, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  I want to add this to article
Talk:Playing It Straight

message: Why is the elimination overview removed on 7-2-2013?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moorlag (talk • contribs) 20:33, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: general

message: Why the "N/A"s for some of the contestants in the Australian version? Surely this information is available.  Gymnophoria (talk) 21:54, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Australian version
Talk:The Republic of Minerva

message: I'm concerned that deletion of this page will obstruct creätion of a page on the actual Republic of Minerva.  You can read about it in Public International Law, VII.A.4: “Menefee, Republics of the Reefs”. —SlamDiego 03:04, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The was an actual Republic of Minerva, of sorts
Talk:Kevin Gaughan

message: I think that Gaughan certainly passes the notability rule of thumb that he is at least as notable as a moderately-well published professor.  He has to date, written one book published by a university press as well as numerous position papers which are highly publicised within the Buffalo-Niagara region.  His accomplishments have been noted by local civic leaders who made him the recipient of a major civic award.  All of these reasons are clearly laid out in the article.  I agree that the citations do need some work, but I am confused as to why the notability tag was added --Cjs56 20:30, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notablility

message: I cleaned this section to better conform to wikipedia's conventions and to removed heavily biased language.  I removed the final two statements as they were unsourced and contained potentially libelous accusations against a living person.  If they can be properly sourced, they can be reinserted.  --Cjs56 (talk) 21:36, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Legal Troubles
Talk:The Virtual Wall

message: *===== Following added by K. J. Davis 10 Dec 2006 =====*
Mr. R. W. Haworth of Croydon, UK has proposed that the entry for The Virtual Wall should be deleted on the grounds that it is (commercial) advertising.  A visit to The Virtual Wall web site makes it clear that the site is financially supported  and operated by volunteers and that contributions and/or donations are neither solicited nor accepted.  I cannot agree that the material presented above is "advertising", any more than is the Wikipedia entry for Mr. Haworth's home city of Croydon.  I believe Mr. Haworth is a bit off base with respect to this Wikipedia article.
:The original article had a few issues that needed to be overcome.  It is good of Mr Haworth to bring the article to a vote. 89.241.106.220 14:45, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

message: Should this page show images that identify individuals?  Snowman 11:17, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I noticed you've taken off all the images, I'm not sure if that's appropriate. I think the first two images with only lists of names should be brought back - there's no violation of privacy since those lists are on the public memorial anyway. I'm undecided on the last two images. The third image (the one detailing information on one soldier) would dodge privacy issues if it was replaced by a screenshot of information regarding a veteran who already has a Wikipedia article, since this information's already been made public by Wikipedia. Quack 688 12:42, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I am not sure about the privacy issues.  I think that specific permission from the relatives would be polite.  You are welcome to return your selected images and see if a consensus of opinion emerges. Snowman 13:42, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Virtual Wall website says that, All material on The Virtual Wall is either copyrighted by www.VirtualWall.org, Ltd. or used with permission,. Snowman 15:43, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Most websites have a notice like that, but "fair use" allows us to use a low-res screenshot or two while discussing the website - at least, that's what seems to happen on other articles that discuss websites. Quack 688 08:34, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Images

message: The criteria for having a wikipage about a website ask for a notable external reference.
Certainly, a laudatory mention in a DoD press release should quality: herehttp://www.defenselink.mil/news/Nov2002/n11082002_200211083.html
The site is also referred to be the congressionally-chartered Vietnam Veterans of Americahttp://www.vva.org/TheVeteran/2004_03/VIRTUALwall.htm
In fact, according the DoD statement, the content of virtualwall.org are regularly uploaded to the official virtual wall: http://www.thevirtualwall.org/index.cfm?SectionID=2
Bottom line: do not delete.  In fact, expand! It would be nice to see more info about the site: services, number of visitors, number of contributors.
Cdamama 08:29, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article meets [[Wikipedia:Notability (web)|Notability Criteria]]
Talk:NewtonScript

message: How is Apple's non-use of its own Dylan, in preference to licensing the externally developed NewtonScript, an example of "Not invented Here"? What that paragraph just missing the requisite number of wiki-buzzwords? Danieleran 03:23, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This seems to be a C class, low importance article according to the criteria outlined at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Computing/Assessmenty. I am new to Wikipedia in general, so please tell me if I have done anything wrong.   -- Pyautogui (talk) 05:00, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: My assessment
Talk:Le monde est stone

message: As far as I know, this song didn't even get into the Top 50 in Oz, but I don't know exactly where it did go.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.194.148.120 (talk) 14:58, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This song did not get to 6 in Australia. 
Talk:Boy Blue (Cyndi Lauper song)

message: errrm sorry but my granny used to sing this to me before 1986, cyndi lauper didnt write the song so this article is based on an incorrect premise  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 113.116.28.138 (talk) 06:32, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  this is not a cyndi lauper song
Talk:Dependency diagram

message: What is an example "timing diagram"? Probably the text should mention the thing before you request a diagram for it... --pfctdayelise (talk) 12:15, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: timing diagram

message: My textbook had a completely different diagram used for "dependency diagrams."
here are some examples. 22:54, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: dependency diagram

message: http://google.com/search?q=database%22dependency+diagram%22+normalization
  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.184.238.231 (talk) 22:52, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: More
Talk:Eductor-jet pump

message: Diagrams and Photo added 27-04-2010 Egmason (talk) 09:56, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: RE the notability tag, I feel eductors are a worthy and notable technical article topic.  I have limited experience with these devices and will see if I can edit the advertising junk out when I get a chance.  I will also look into generating a diagram as well.  Finally, we should include a link to ejectors and list alternative names by which eductors are known to help readers find this article.--CheMechanical (talk) 22:11, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability - Keep

message: Suggesting a merge as both articles seem to be about the same kind of pump? StealthFox 01:01, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. I recommend eductor-jet pump be merged into aspirator. Neelix (talk) 21:04, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree but the other way. I think the Aspirator is a specific type of the more general eductor pump. Egmason (talk) 09:56, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with [[Aspirator]]

message: The section following "There are three connections common to all jet pumps" attempts to explain how these pumps operate. I feel that the author has partly missed the point, especially with (2). The eductor actually causes the fluid to flow by generating an area of low pressure at the point where the jet meets the suction stream.--GILDog (talk) 05:39, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: How Eductors Work

message: This article needs a complete re-write. The article is now simply a advertisment for Caltec, can that Author please refrain from using Wikipedia as free promotion tool. Unless this information is changed I will revert the article back to the original. GILDog (talk) 00:39, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Caltec
File talk:Fiesta 28 4 cover.jpg

message: Wikipedia fair use guidelines for fair use of magazine covers has been reviewed.  On the basis of this review, it was determined that use of this image in the Charmaine Sinclair article was not fair, and it has been removed from that article.  However, it seems well within the guidelines to use this image in the Fiesta (magazine) article itself.  The fair use rationale, which is copied below, has been modified to reflect this use. Charmaine1997 03:31, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Electronic warfare officer

message: This article is extremely outdated for current EWO training.  It also contains gross errors. Cizzo 03:02, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Apparently, it alluded to the golliwog metal badges that were available if you sent in 10 (?) labels from a Robertson's Jam jar in the UK.  The idea being that EWOs were promoted other than on merit. EWoc (talk) 18:57, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

message: Is an EWO a navigator?  I want to apply for AECP but only if I can be an EWO on the RC-135.  Since, AECP won't accept anyone for pilot or nav programs I wouldn't be able to do it.  I'm a 1A8 now and I would really like to stay in this community.  If anyone knows let me know.
:Yes. An EWO is a rated navigator. If AECP will not accept, may consider getting out and going through ROTC. My father was the ranking EWO in the Air Force for a while (he flew on the RC-135S and RC-135X...don't bother looking up much on the last one, it was mostly a program shrouded in classified stuff, but was more expensive than the B-2!!!), so he is pretty knowledgeable on the subject. Please contact me on my talk page and I'll be happy to answer any questions for you. — BQZip01 — talk 21:49, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Again, this is a USAF-centric view... in the Royal Air Force (and others...) an EWO is 'normally' an Airborne Electronics Operator (AEOp) or Airborne Electronics Officer (AEO).  Albeit, as a brevetted RAF navigator, I also qualified to act as an EWO on one squadron. EWoc (talk) 18:52, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Question about EWOs

message: EWO training at the 563rd is part of initial EWO training, not sure you could really call it "advanced"--75.64.143.121 (talk) 18:26, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "advanced training"