lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Abd al-Rahman al-Kawakibi

message: For proper alphabetical placement within categories, revising "listas=" to indicate "Rahmankawakibi, Abd" [the name will still appear as "Abd al-Rahman al-Kawakibi" in each category specified at the bottom of this discussion page]; adding :Category:Date of birth missing, :Category:Date of death missing [the sole details in the article are the years of birth and death], :Category:Place of birth missing and :Category:Place of death missing [again, no details other than the unexplained :Category:People from Aleppo, which may indicate that the subject lived most of his life in Aleppo, but that the city was not necessarily his birthplace or place of death]—Roman Spinner (talk) 11:58, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The name's alphabetical placement, according to www.damascus-online.com is "Kawakibi, Abdul Rahman al-".  Since "listas=" and DEFAULTSORT function in a more-specific fashion with the elimination of spaces and symbols [other than the central separation comma and space], the name, for the purpose of sorting, is rendered as "Kawakibi, Abdalrahmanal", with "Abdalrahmanal" representing "Abd al-Rahman al-".—Roman Spinner (talk) 14:51, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Expanded edit summary
File talk:Web20buzz.svg

message: Intelligence is spelled wrong.
-anonymous
SaaS appears twice.  Why is that?
9ign 22:31, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

message: It would be cool if this talk page had links to the terms in this picture, which serves as a visual index of web 2.0 terms like:
Folksonomy
Long Tail
SaaS
Mathiastck 17:22, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Folksonomy
Talk:Make

message: I propose Make be moved to Make (software) and this page be moved to Make. I think it is equally, if not more, likely that users are looking for brands or the magazine.  —Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley talk contrib 04:39, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There wasn't any dissent so I moved it to make (software).  I need an admin to move make (disambiguation) though (even though the target only had a single edit when I tried). —Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley talk contrib 14:55, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

text: Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Support as nominator. Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley talk contrib 04:56, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Support as nominator. Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley talk contrib 04:56, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: This paragraph was removed:
* The verb "to make"; referring to creating a new object, modyfiying or repairing an existing one.
Since other articles also include verbs (ie To do), I think the line should be reintegrated
91.182.203.233 (talk) 11:43, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see Wikipedia:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages)#Individual entries and WP:DABNOT for rationale. --Old Moonraker (talk) 12:41, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: reverted edit

message: A AMERICA FLINT RAPPER STARTED RAPPING BACK IN 2017, UPCOMING RAPPER BORN (MARCH 27, 2008) YOUTUBE (YWNMARIAYE) 68.48.65.9 (talk) 01:47, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Damariaye Delano dendy
Talk:B&B Theatres

message: Can anyone find a source for this information? I believe some of these may be untrue allegations about the company.
Before I begin my rebuttal, let me simply state that although I do work for this company, I was not asked to create this article as part of any promotional campaign, nor was I compensated for my work in editing Wikipedia. I am not involved in the management or marketing departments of the company. I simply am a dedicated Wikipedian striving to cover, as unbiased as possible, a company that I believe has a presence in the midwest and deserves an article. I felt that I knew about the company and had close references to ask questions and get information from. I hope that this article is not deleted simply because I work for the company it pertains to. Would you check the background of every Wikipedian that edited the McDonald's article to make sure they aren't McDonald's employees? I think that would be a little too much. Therefore, I made all attempts to cover only what I could back up with references. I hope the Wikipedia community will consider the content of the article before immediately denouncing it as biased and deleting it.
Now, in response to the 'difficult employer' allegations on the article, I must say that I have never had a problem with missing employee meetings. I always check with my manager well in advance and notify him that I will not be able to attend. Also, I have never felt that these meetings were sprung on me last-minute. It has never seemed a problem before. 
I was just wondering what references the editor who placed that paragraph could provide as evidence of this allegation. Thank you for your consideration of this issue. Genius00345 04:52, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Those unsourced allegations have been removed.  Corvus cornix 04:58, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Difficult Employer

message: The same user (Mileam) has posted another unsourced allegation about the company. I will remove it as the other allegations have been removed. Genius00345 00:41, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: It appears to be happening again
Talk:Boston Dynamics

message: Digidog - Is this a new product or a rebranding of an existing one? https://metro.co.uk/2021/03/02/police-robot-digidog-labelled-racist-because-of-where-it-patrols-14170191/ https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/mar/02/nypd-police-robodog-patrols
86.128.69.26 (talk) 12:13, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Digidog 

message: See 
 for its use at Pompeii. China may start large scale production of these. Doug Weller talk 13:58, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spot being used in archaeology
Talk:Oil and gas law in the United States

message: This article is riddled with incomplete case citations. I have put the citations in footnote form. Later, we'll look for the cases and try to complete the citations. Famspear (talk) 11:26, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I added some content with citations under Regulations that I thought would be relevant.Zeldaslink (talk) 23:02, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Incomplete citations

message: The introduction to the page, and first section are nearly word for word from this site: https://www.hg.org/oil-and-gas-law.html  Bothell130 (talk) 19:00, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Plagiarism
Talk:Mineral rights

message: without at least some mention of which county/legal jurisdiction this refers to the article is fairly useless!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.171.178.157 (talk) 10:00, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: How do you purchase or otherwise obtain mineral rights? Who can sell or transfer mineral rights? How are mineral rights recorded (e.g. with a deed)? How is the value of the (unextracted) minerals accounted for in mineral rights? How are externalized costs (e.g. the inevitable pollution) accounted for in mineral rights? Thanks! --Lbeaumont (talk) 10:47, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Buying, selling, and recording mineral rights.
Talk:Characters in the Gameworld Trilogy

message: Kirin is neither ravian, nor rakshas. Hence he can't be put under either heading. Hence I moved the paragraph. 
Kirin is portrayed as a hero (or anti-hero, if you will) and is shown to have considerable nerve in the second book. His ineffectual (?) or lack-of-a-backbone attributes are missing. For instance, Kirin kills the rakshas cousin who impersonates him to order a war (he does it with that ravian-lightning thing). Also, he is described in the book as having a cold, calculating look - something that you can't attribute to someone who has no idea what has to be done. 
Moreover the plot twists like using the vaman chariot and taking Red with him, knowing that she is not Maya imply that Kirin has something in mind, rather than being a total slacker. 
Hence the edit. As always, discussion(s) is(are) welcome.
Heavynash 05:01, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Philippine Commission

message: I noticed today that this page seems to discuss just the Second Philippine Commission.  My understanding is that the Schurman Commission was the First Philippine commission and the Taft Commission was the Second Philippine Commission. I have edited the page to break it up into separate sections about First and Second Philippine Commissions, and I've recast some previous sections as subsections inside of the section about the Second Philippine Commission.
As I was doing this, I noticed that info on this page disagrees with info on the Taft Comission page.  The Taft commission page discusses a session not mentioned on this page, and ithis page discusses sessions not mentioned on the Taft commission page.  Is there anyone out here who knows enough about this to straighten this out?  My suggestion would be to merge the info on the two pages, verify the accuracy of the merged info (citing the sources used in that verification), move the details to the Taft commission page, and summarize the highlights of Taft Commission page in the Second Philippine Commission section on this page. -- Boracay Bill 05:03, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 4 July 2007 changes

message: It met in Baguio, but where in Manila did it meet? Howard the Duck (talk) 20:43, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meeting place
Talk:Whiteley Wood Hall

message: I will remove the deletion per user request.  However, I will watch the page for a few days to see if the author or community can assert its notability.  Tdmg 05:06, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ? It's a historic building. A photo would be nice, for sure. Troggalot 05:13, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Just do what you need to do.  I'd rather feel good about keeping this article than proposing its deletion.  Tdmg 05:26, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speedy Deletion
Talk:Maouloud Baby v. State

message: The narrative under the "case" heading is the testimony of the defendant in the original case.  By using this is as the "official version" of what transpired that day and ignoring others' testimonies, the case is presented deceptively as void of competing versions of what transpired.  Additionally, since the official findings of the convicting case is not used, the narrative in question is not entirely relevant as it is supposed to set up the reader's ability to understand the historical conflict from which the appeals process emerged.  There are competing versions based on various different testimonies, but the case in question is predicated upon the findings in the original trial where the defendant was found guilty, and subsequently became the appellant in Baby vs Maryland.  These findings -- that led to the conviction -- should be used if any single version is to be used at all.72.244.203.102 03:43, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unbalanced POV in case description; possibly irrelevant altogether

message: The article also needs an analysis of why the Court of Special Appeals ruled to overturn the conviction (application of common law). Understanding of the importance of this case is hampered by the apparent lack of other specific wikipedia articles on (1) legal consent to sexual activity in U.S. law (and withdrawal of consent), (2) juvenile/adult crimes, (3) effect of common law in Maryland criminal law. Artilce also will need definitions of Maryland state charges for sexual offenses; watch for update on ruling by Court of Appeals. Deanlaw (talk) 18:21, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: other needs
Talk:Debbie Does Dallas ... Again

message: Dwanyewest 05:30, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled #1

message: I agree it should stay but it needs more focus. Is it about the Showtime show or the movie? -MDSNYDER 05:34, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *Since the Showtime series is about the making of the film, the article should discuss both. If enough information develops the film and the show can be split into separate articles. Otto4711 13:14, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled #2
Talk:Law of Bulgaria

message: I removed the section "Bulgarian law firms", it wasn't really necessary, plus it was somewhat quite selective, and could be considered advertising. 77.78.9.222 (talk) 13:58, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
Talk:My Life with Albertine

message: Just started the article, was browsing around looking for information on it and realized that other than a brief mention in In Search of Lost Time, there was none! One thing I'm unsure about is the capitalization of the title... on further review, maybe it should be "My Life with Albertine" (no capital W). If that's right, then how would one change the article title? I'm not familiar with doing that. Hm. QBKooky 05:36, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Rosemary Gladstar

message: I am trying to create this page on Rosemary Gladstar and am new to Wikipedia. Now the page is frozen for copyright infringement, but I wasn't finished yet. Just letting the administrator know I am trying to improve it. Thanks.
You can find the administrator and contact him or her directly.  It is important to change the wording when you quote information or the bots will pick it up as plagiarism.  You can quote a few paragraphs, but put them within the blockquotes in the symbol part of the page.  Go to the article tab at the top of this page, then click edit this page.  It won't bring you back here but to the Rosemary Gladstar/Temp editing page.  Write the page, with the changes, then contact the administrator and say you wish to replace the original page.  You can contact me at ksvaughan2@aol.com if you have questions- I had the same problem on my first piece. KSVaughan2 17:51, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The first paragraph is wonderful, in particular you've done a really good job referencing it.  I am still concerned about copyright with the second paragraph.  While it isn't identical, I think if I were an author looking to protect my copyright I'd find it a little too close for comfort.  The tone also seems a little off.  I would suggest that User:Ksvaughan2 create a clean version of the article at Rosemary Gladstar/Temp2 without the second paragraph (it should be OK to use the other text you already have since you wrote it).  Any important information from that paragraph can be added later.  Once this has been done, I think it should be uncontroversial for an administrator to delete the current two versions and move the second temp version into place, and I will act to get this done.  — The Storm Surfer 01:20, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

text: I made changes to the first temp page- seemed unnecessary to have two.  KSVaughan2 23:58, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mayajalam

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. Clear consensus to move this page. Mayajalam will also be moved to Mayajalam (1998 film). Though this is not an action that there is explicit consensus for in this RM, it is the logical consequence of carrying out the move, as there is no evident primary topic between the two films. (closed by non-admin page mover) Elli (talk | contribs) 04:12, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Maayajaalam →  – All sources use this name. DareshMohan (talk) 10:10, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 9 May 2022 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
----
:Mayajalam (2006 film) →  – No need for (2006 film) identifier. DareshMohan (talk) 23:07, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: *The articles associated with Balu Kiriyath seem to constitute a walled garden of sorts. The film pages each make claims to commercial success, but the cites attached to those sentences don't back up the claims. Not having looked for additional sources I'm unsure how notable any of the films are, but the articles do not give me much confidence. Dekimasuよ! 17:05, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 3 June 2022
Talk:Clean Pastures

message: There are at least two other sources that this article could draw upon to make it more comprehensive:
* Beck, Jerry, and Will Friedwald (1989). Looney Tunes and Merrie Melodies: A Complete Illustrated Guide to the Warner Bros. Cartoons. Owl Books. . (Should have a few paragraphs on the cartoon that might give Beck and Friedwald's opinion of it or mention other important details.)
* Sampson, Henry T. (1998). That's Enough Folks: Black Images in Animated Cartoons, 1900–1960. The Scarecrow Press. . (May include reviews from contemporary sources that would be a good contrast to the more modern reviews cited in the article.)
I own both books, but they are in storage back in the States. If anyone has access and can add any relevant material, it would be much appreciated! — Brian (talk) 09:06, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other sources 

message: The sentence in the lead: Later commentators surmise that the censors... is non-NPOV, irrelevant and 'weasel-worded'.  What the Hays censors actually objected to is well documented, as is represented later in the article (and elsewhere). ~Eric F 184.76.225.106 (talk) 03:35, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Later commentators surmise... 

message: It is claimed in various parts of Wikipedia, and elsewhere on the internet, that the jazz standard "Nagasaki" appears in this cartoon.  Unless the versions on youtube are edited, the song does not actually seem to appear in the cartoon. Sojambi Pinola (talk) 13:37, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Nagasaki
Talk:Monterey clipper/Archive 1

message: I found the comments by others to be true, unfortunately there is very little information out there about these historical and wonderful little boats. So it is nice to see the information in more places, but credit must be given to the information source. 
I have visited Fisherman's Wharf in San Francisco and found some of these great Monterey Clipper boats, and their owners who will share their colorful history. Most of the history is still in the minds of the few Fishermen who are on the docks. From the Monterey Clipper owners at Fisherman's Wharf, these boats are also commonly called "Montereys" and "Double enders". They are now being preserved by some devoties as historical icons. These little boats are part of what built Fisherman's Wharf, and the west coast fishing industries. 
On the web I found a great site: montereyclipper.com http://www.montereyclipper.com]] it is very basic, but good info and site admin will answer your questions. Also The Maritime bookstore at the the Hyde Street Pier National Maritime Park has some good books: "If you take care of 'em, they will last!"  and "Fisherman's Wharf".''
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
THIS INFO
This article should be done by Monday. It's mostly written. I just have to wikify any unwritten parts. meatclerk 08:17, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  MONTEREYCLIPPER.COM 

message: This article needs revision based on new material. I had noted eariler in the footnotes. It's here now. -- meatclerk 09:37, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite
Talk:List of moths of India

message: What is the plan for smaller (by number) families ? Shyamal 11:08, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you in a hurry! :-) Feel free to contribute. All families will have a specific list page. Butterflies are still not done, after two years, we've just about stabilised some families. Hesperiids and Satyriines have not yet been touched. Moths is going to be a very long hard struggle. Regards, AshLin 15:38, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Callidulidae]] 

message: Image:Greenmoth sal.jpg|01 Family Geometridae. Subfamily Geometrinae Genus Agathia species have to check
Image:Piedmoth_sal.jpg|02 
Image:Blackborder_moth_sal.jpg|03
Image:Moth wayanad greystripe.jpg|04 Family Uraniidae subfamily Microniinae
Image:Unkn moth talakaveri.jpg|05 Family Arctiidae Genus Pericallia probably species ricinii
Image:Moth1talakaveri.jpg|06 Family Geometridae   Genus Macaria species have to check
Image:Moth2talakaveri.jpg|07 Phazaca sp.
Image:Saturnid talakaveri.jpg|08
Image:Barsine moth.jpg|09 Barsine sp.
Image:Moth coorg saturnid.jpg|10
Image:Moth coorg.jpg|11 (Pyralid)
Image:WynaadMoth1.jpg|12
Image:WynaadMoth2.jpg|13
Image:WynaadMoth3.jpg|14
Image:ArctiidWynaad.jpg‎|15 Family Arctiidae Genus Nyctemera probably latistriga
Image:SphingidWynaad.jpg |16 Sphingidae Family, Theretra clotho clotho. In this species, the oblique line runs into the one that comes in from the wing tip. In the closely related Theretra gnoma, the oblique line and that coming in from the wing tip miss each other, giving a double effect near the wing tip.
Moths needing id Shyamal 16:00, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unid
Talk:Punjabi Mexican Americans

message: What in the hell? Is this a joke?  06:22, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Someone deleted the references. Not sure why. Please justify edits on the discussion page. The World & I is a book by an anthropologist at UC Davis. You can look it up on google. The other reference is a PBS documentary. Neither is a self-reference, and the former at least is an expert source. Chantoke 17:01, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: Can we have a photo of such a family? --84.20.17.84 15:47, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Photograph

message: This article says most Punjabi men in Northern California (Yuba City) did not marry, while they did marry Mexican Americans in the Imperial valley of Southern California.  It also says that the Punjabi Mexican Americans are of the Yuba City area.  This does not match up.  What are the facts? Hmains (talk) 23:27, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Both the Punjabi and Mexican-Americans followed the seasonal farm harvests in the migrant labor trek across California. The workers may be in Imperial valley during the winter months, then be in the Central or Sacramento Valleys (Yuba city is 30 miles north of the state capital Sacramento) in the summer time. The state miscegenation laws of the 1910's and 1920's made it difficult for spouses of other races to legally marry, but I doubt any got married under Mexican law in the Mexican side of Imperial valley. 
Another well known crosscultural group are Filipino-Mexican Americans, and I believe there's a sufficient need for an article to historically explore the  sizable number of Filipinos from the then-U.S. ruled Philippines from 1901 to 40 joined the Mexican community of California. Both the two groups lived under Spanish rule, had ancestors converted to Christianity primarily are Roman Catholic, and adapted many features or customs of a Latin American culture. +  71.102.2.206 (talk) 07:55, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  confusion