lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:My Lucky Night

message: Anyone know what the riddle was? I will not specify what I did to Mr. Jameson, I will just verify that I was present when the murder happened. 18:07, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Two coins add up to 30 Cents, one of them is not a nickel, what are they?
--Jac16888 16:04, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Jug Suraiya

message: Not required since Dubyaman already has a mention in Jug Suraiya. Instead it may be deleted.--PremKudvaTalk 04:17, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: It has been suggested that  [[Dubyaman]] be merged into this article or section.
Talk:Geoffrey Richardson (musician)

message: Does anyone have any information about a band named Crank in Washington DC, reportedly started by Mr Richardson?
Steve Roth
Michigan
steve@rothsound.com
71.13.58.63 (talk) 04:35, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geoff Richardson and the band Crank in Washington DC
Talk:Cerwin-Vega

message: This was tagged for deletion for company criteria
i fail to see why JBL, Mackie and Alpine meet the company criteria, and Cerwin Vega, being an actually innovative company in electronics development is not.
Because it isn't well written and has a derth of facts.Guess this is as good a place as any to start.Dwaink 07:55, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Cerwin-Vega exclusively caters to the 'Golden Ear' crowd with its delicate reproduction of natural sound. Such a company is rare today and I believe deserves to be retained within the pages of Wikipedia.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.29.93.15 (talk) 09:08, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
Talk:George Tutuska

message: Someone needs to source the sentence claiming Tutuska's leaving the Goo Goo Dolls was related to the ethnicity of his wife - this is a pretty strong claim and is potentially slanderous against the other members of the band.  The sentence is also a mess grammatically, but I left it intact.  I'm going to keep an eye on this and if there are no references posted within a month or so, I'm going to delete it.  Colinclarksmith (talk) 15:43, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I went ahead and removed it. Colinclarksmith (talk) 00:40, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Racism allegation
Talk:Gia Darling

message: This particular entry, particularly the biographical part (even though it's referenced), reads more like a passage rom a press release or résumé than an encyclopedia article. 70.124.89.116 (talk) 08:44, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tone of article 
Talk:Glenda Hood

message: This entry seems rather biased against Hood. Shouldn't we advocate a neutral POV here?Mike 20:00, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Gopinath Munde

message: This article is fully sourced from one single WP:OR source which claim to be official website of Gopinath munde(subject to verify) I'm removing the POV material. Please add source(neutral and published)before re-inserting it. RouLong (talk) 21:39, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Single Source  

message: see heading Eeanxi (talk) 00:19, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: "Work against underworld" missing information
Talk:The Idiot Weekly

message: Contrary to many published sources, I am 100% convinced that The Australian Flag and The Prime Minister's Trousers are not from the first series. The closing titles list the series 2 cast in both episodes. The Australian Flag is also announced as "the last of the present series". Dbromage 06:59, May 31, 2005 (UTC)
:I'm not too knowledgable with this radio show but maybe the folks at Wikiquote can help you out with some of the titles. They seem to have them in some sort of order and listing --Agester 02:59, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Episode titles and series

message: There was a comedy series originated at 2UE entitled "Three's a Crowd" starring Michael Bentine, John Bluthal and David Nettheim, almost or exactly contemporary with T.I.W. The theme song went something like:
:Three's a Crowd, you've heard it before, that
:Three's a Crowd, you cannot ignore, that
:One is lonely, two is insufficient, but Three's a Crowd to make a show that's different
:Three's a Crowd, you cannot ignore, that
:Three's a Crowd.'
I remember or part-remember the title of only one episode; that was The Peanut Butter Mine. The show apparently ran to 34 episodes.   Doug butler (talk) 21:30, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Three's a Crowd (Australian radio series)
Talk:Gordon Gund

message: Gund’s wife Llura died peacefully at home on March 15 2020. This is true. A cavaliers statement is at https://www.nba.com/cavaliers/releases/lulie-gund-200316 Jared L 9999 (talk) 17:45, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death of Wife
Talk:Solid-state chemistry

message: Just as a matter of clarity - when chemists refer to "Solid-State Chemistry", it usually refers to work on inorganic solids, independent of any useful properties they may have, while Materials Chemistry refers to work on any solid, organic or inorganic, with useful properties, and is more properly considered a (broad) subdiscipline between chemsitry (a basic science) and materials science (an engineering discipline). This distinction, of course, forces us to draw a distinction at a fuzzy point on things like MOFs/Coordination Polymers, but it's probably for the best that we draw it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.3.171.128 (talk) 05:14, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separating Solid-State Chemistry from Materials Chemistry 

message: The term 'solid state' in the 20th century arose when vacuum tubes were phased out by transistors.
The vacuum tubes contained only matter in the solid phase. However, they were composed of many individual
parts, surrounded by a vacuum space, enclosed in glass. A transistor, in contrast, is basically one individual
working component, other than the wires / electrical leads and any housing. The semiconductor portion of n-type
and p-type silicon (etc.) is one joined unit. THIS is the difference between solid state and non-solid state.
Solid state technology has nothing to do with solid phases, gas phases, or liquid phases. A hypothetical liquid
semiconductor, contained within some housing, would still be considered solid state. However, vacuum tubes
are not solid state because they are composed of many discrete parts (made from various materials) in a three-
dimensional architecture; they are not one single 'solid' piece of material doing the same function.
-  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.57.134.10 (talk) 14:03, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Solid State does not require that solid phases are used or exclusively used
Talk:Templeton, California

message: I started to write the history section, but my brain isn't working sufficiently well enough to write it creatively without making it a copyvio from one or both of the sites I posted. So I was a bit unorthodox and left a note with some source pages in the article. I figure I'll get back to it before anyone else sees it, anyway, but if you really think it's a bad idea, feel free to delete it (or at least move the note to this talk page...) cluth 04:32, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  History section 

message: I added several free-licensed photos from Flickr, after noticing a good one that a Flickr friend posted, and checked for others.
Another editor promptly reverted, commenting: "None of these photos are explanatory of the copy...."  and further objecting (I think) that these were attractive photos. Very odd. To this editor: WP pages are always a work in progress. If you're at all familiar with Templeton, the Feed store "tower" has been a local landmark for generations, and the winery and entertainment businesses are both important to the local economy. I don't doubt that the article could be improved, but let's not go backwards here. Thanks,  Pete Tillman (talk) 20:07, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually,  this editor was just plain wrong: the wineries and Feed businesses are specifically mentioned in our article, including Castoro Cellars by name. See Economy para. --Pete Tillman (talk) 20:20, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Who is this "our" you speak of? John from Idegon (talk) 20:43, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe that "our" referred to the Wikipedia community, but of course I could be wrong. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 18:33, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo adds reverted and restored
Talk:Graeme Segal

message: Ref 4:
Segal, Graeme. "Geometric aspects of quantum field theory." In Proc. Intern. Congress Kyoto 1990, Math. Soc, pp. 1387–1396. 1990.
is broken  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.128.202.80 (talk) 00:42, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken Link 

message: Segal's place of birth is not mentioned.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.176.252.226 (talk) 11:39, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: He was in Australia at one time.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.176.252.226 (talk) 11:42, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Place of birth 

message: Segal's date of birth is variously given as 1941 and 1942.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.176.252.226 (talk) 12:11, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date 
Talk:Graeme Smith (footballer, born 1983)

message: http://www.seagulls.co.uk/page/Latest/0,,10433~1709258,00.html Signed today for Brighton  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.97.162.89 (talk) 14:56, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Seina Yamada

message: Why would anyone mention another anime that has no relavence to the character?  Is it to make a comparison? BiggKwell 04:51, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  This can't be right: "As a result, a political marriage between Seina, Amane, Kiriko, Ryoko Balta, Neju and Fuku was made." Why would he marry the cabbit (Fuku)? (Duane543 01:38, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed (Duane543 02:07, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Don't understand something
Talk:SingStar '80s

message: Not Polish Tracklist —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 83.19.158.211 (talk) 17:13, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Polish Tracklist 
Talk:SingStar Rocks

message: I don't have the time to add it with correct formatting myself, but I figured I should at least post the Aussie/NZ tracklist here for someone else to do. :)
Gangajang - Sounds Of Then (This Is Australia) 
The Killers - Somebody Told Me 
Bowling For Soup - 1985 
The Church - Unguarded Moment 
INXS - Never Tear Us Apart 
Thin Lizzy - The Boys Are Back In Town 
Hole - Celebrity Skin 
The Veronicas - 4ever 
Grinspoon - Hard Act To Follow 
Stereophonics - Dakota 
Jet - Are You Gonna Be My Girl? 
Powderfinger - These Days 
Killing Heidi - I Am 
Scorpions - Wind Of Change 
Nirvana - Come As You Are 
Powderfinger - (Baby I’ve Got You) On My Mind 
Men At Work - Down Under 
Deep Purple - Smoke On The Water 
The Swingers - Counting The Beat 
The Screaming Jets - Better 
Rolling Stones - Paint It Black 
Coldplay - Speed Of Sound 
The Exponents - Why Does Love Do This To Me? 
Gwen Stefani - What You Waiting For 
Dragon - April Sun In Cuba 
The Offspring - Self Esteem 
Blur - Song 2 
The Cardigans - My Favourite Game 
End of Fashion - Oh Yeah 
Franz Ferdinand - Do You Want To?
Cheers! - BrotherEstapol 13:08, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aussie/NZ Tracklist 

message: So everywhere I looked, the exclamation point (!) is part of the title.  I put it into the body of the article already and suggest moving the page.  If there are no objections soon I'll go ahead with it.  Thanks, all.  JSellers0 00:13, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Page Title
Talk:Music in Twelve Parts

message: this article is not encyclopedic. most importantly, sources need to be cited. 
if anyone reading this knows more about this piece, please improve the article. specific information that might be important:
- any significant performances
- things the composer has said about the piece
- analysis based on whatever methods are currently used to analyze mid-to-late 20th century minimalism
please do not include your personal opinion, unless it is part of a "these are what critics say about the piece" section. if you do choose to do this, please try and present all relevant opinions as presented the authors, and cite the source of those opinions. where applicable, include quotations.
in this spirit, that new yorker quote is good, but the actual source should be cited, e.g. with the date and volume/issue number.
--Danreitz 04:57, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Has there been any variation in the several releases of music in twelve parts? Its my understanding that the recent re-issue has extra vocals on some of the pieces.--Redblossom (talk) 09:13, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change in recording?
Talk:Cuff

message: seems to me like it would make sense to merge the articles Barrel cuff and French cuff into this article, since all three articles are very short and Button cuff does not have its own article.  The Collar (clothing) article is done this way.  Convertible cuffs should be added.  Blood pressure cuff belongs on the disambiguation page. Kullanari 03:51, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undefined 

message: I heard this used to be a way that they'd keep track of how much someone owed, a rolled up piece of paper on a paper cylinder on the wrist, just wondered when this was 71.184.110.64 (talk) 00:53, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: cuffs used to record money owed

message: You cannot fold French cuffs round like a barrel cuff; the sleeve placket isn't designed for it and will kink, the cuff would sit at an odd angle, and you would be exposed for the fool that you are!
Brendan  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.78.77.211 (talk) 18:13, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: How to wear French/Double cuffs

message: Can anyone document the shift in the US from almost universal use of cuffs in dress pats in the US to  the common non-use? I think it happened around the seventies of th elast century. Kdammers (talk) 02:17, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  History of pants cuffs
Talk:Godin Tepe

message: The article states that Level IV (the Transcaucasian Yanik-culture) was followed by Level V (3200-3000 BC), and by Level VI. But in these article I see the sequence Period VI (calcolithic)-Period V (ending in 3000 BC)-Period IV (Transcaucasian/Yanik, 3000-2650 BC). It needs to be verified. --Amizzoni 05:29, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sole Survivor Policy

message: The article doesn't actually explain what the policy says; just that its intent is to protect surviving family members who've already had a sibling killed in the line of duty. It doesn't explain how it protects them. -Juansmith 05:31, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If there were 3 kids if 1 died would 2 go home or is it if 2 died 1 would go home?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.158.39.255 (talk) 17:25, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the policy? 

message: doesnt this seem a little short  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.226.24.105 (talk) 07:44, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If you can find more info, add it! Joshdboz (talk) 03:50, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  short? 

message: Presumably valuable information, on which copyright is claimed by About.com (and which is available without charge at one About.com page, and/or  another) was copied into this section, and has now been removed. While our usual concern is with WP:COPYVIOs that take place on article pages rather than talk pages, copyright law and WP policy of complying with it each apply equally on our talk pages.--Jerzy•t 21:04, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sole Surviving Son or Daughter 

message: just a little bit though, i thought this applied to being the only male surviving ex. if the father, is still alove but in 60s or so, and only one son, should that son enlist would he be deplyable to Combat zoens, or should he be only male left due to lack of brothers born would he be deplyable  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.186.215.219 (talk) 04:24, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  confused 

message: Yes, there are conventions about salving the feelings of those who are loved ones of the honored dead, but i changed the PoV "tragedy" (whose literal meaning in context is no different from "celebrated incident involving 0.0000 01% or fewer of the deaths in the world's most tragic war") to "deaths". I'm grateful to be an American, but i don't think it's a PA against whichever colleague(s) consciously assented to, or read past, that wording, to say that the popular version of American exceptionalism -- "proud to be an American" -- is just as pretentious as, and insignificantly less poisonous than, pride of membership in the NSDAP or the CPSU was. (If any such editors are reading this, there's a pretty good chance i'm a worse human than you, but more to the point, its always fair that when we die, they shovel dirt in our faces.)--Jerzy•t 20:09, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shameful myopia
Talk:WLOX

message: * Since when did photographers and producers start appearing on TV pages? A little too much, don't you think? - --Bdj95 05:38, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: News media people think they are special and worthy of Wikipedia notation apparently.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.19.150.110 (talk) 01:31, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: Hello, Please do not add unreferenced names as entries to the list of former employees in articles. Including this type of material in articles does not abide by current consensus and its inclusion is strongly discouraged in our policies and guidelines. The rationales are as follows:
#WP:NOT tells us, Wikipedia is "not an indiscriminate collection of information."  As that section describes, just because something is true, doesn't necessarily mean the info belongs in Wikipedia.  
#As per WP:V, we cannot include information in Wikipedia that is not verifiable and sourced. 
# WP:Source list tells us that lists included within articles (including people's names) are subject to the same need for references as any other information in the article. 
#Per WP:BLP, we have to be especially careful about including un-sourced info about living persons.
If you look at articles about companies in general, you will not find mention of previous employees, except in those cases where the employee was particularly notable.  Even then, the information is not presented just as a list of names, but is incorporated into the text itself (for example, when a company's article talks about the policies a previous CEO had, or when they mention the discovery/invention of a former engineer/researcher). If a preexisting article is already in the encyclopedia for the person you want to add to a list, it's generally regarded as sufficient to support their inclusion in list material in another article. cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 22:46, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding unreferenced entries of former employees to lists containing BLP material 

message: and looks TERRIBLE!  And they even have it set like this during football games!  It makes my eyes bleed.  The Fox station has HD on BOTH channels, what gives???  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.19.150.110 (talk) 01:30, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  CBS sub-channel is standard definition
Template talk:Conduct policy list

message: shouldn't be called "Behavioral". That has bad connotations. The other policy list has "Working with others" which is pretty good. There might be something better but "behavioral" has the connotation of "behavioral problems" and it is also better to keep it simple. —Centrx→talk • 05:46, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Social policies? >Radiant< 17:10, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  The label 'behavioral' is taken directly from the list of policies. If you want to change it here, I suggest you change it there first. Fresheneesz 22:42, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Reply (more than 3 years later): the cat is and was "Wikipedia content policy", and I agree that "behave" sounds either prim or ironic (think Austin Powers).  Page now moved to "content". - Dank (push to talk) 14:31, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  2006
Talk:Yellow-dog contract

message: There may not be a worldview to present if this term is peculiar to the history of the United States. While similar contracts might or might not exist or have existed elsewhere, they may be called something different and be not "yellow dog" contracts. —Centrx→talk • 05:58, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Worldview

message: There is a header with "origin of the term" in it but no actual discussion of the origin of the term.  Was it the origin racist?  I know the term "yellow" meant part black in the US at the time.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.72.166.6 (talk) 00:54, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Origin of the term

message: The first sentence of this article says:
A yellow-dog contract...is an agreement between an employer and an employee in which the employee agrees, as a condition of employment, not to be a member of a labor union.Then later in the article it says:
...it was not membership in a union that was usually prohibited, but participation in those essential activities without which membership is valueless.Well, which is it?  --Captain Quirk (talk) 15:07, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction -- union membership prohibited or not? 

message: This article is focused on United States. --88.7.34.245 (talk) 22:02, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Globalize
Talk:International Polytechnic High School

message: Please do not add yourself as a list of notable alumni pursuant to the above policy. If you feel you should be listed, please provide an explanation in the talk space. Erechtheus 06:02, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:AUTO]] 

message: http://www.lacoe.edu/orgs/1021/index.cfm
WhisperToMe (talk) 21:50, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Stuff
Talk:Dianne Houston

message: I put only because Karolyn Ali was a producer, but I'm not 100% sure the statement is correct.--T. Anthony 06:04, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I missed the LGBT thing, was that in one of the links?--T. Anthony 07:04, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article needs to be cleaned up as it has a lot of verbiage describing the films and television series, but not much about what she did in those productions. It needs to be more about her work. In the writing, cite what she used for inspiration, and whether she conceived of the story or did the adaptation/script. In directing, mention any techniques she used. Also in the TV series, did she work on an entire season, multiple episodes, or a single episode? Much of this section can be best summarized in a Filmography section. Also the article needs more references for her quotes and statements. When the content is beefed up, then you can resubmit for copyediting. Thanks. AngusWOOF (talk) 19:50, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Cleaned up.Justbean (talk) 04:12, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Please cleanup
Talk:Anterior chain

message: Searching Google, I see very little reference to the "anterior chain" as it is used in the context of this article and no reference to it on reputable sources in those search results.  The posterior chain involves the calves, hamstrings, glutes, and lower back.  Therefore, as an antagonist, shouldn't the anterior chain involve the quadriceps, glutes, and abdominal muscles?  The biceps, chest, obliques, and serratus anterior should not be listed. This article needs an expert's attention. — 24.166.65.230 06:14, 11 September 2006 (UTC)