Talk:Chhinnamasta

message: *Please see my comments on page Chinnamastaka. --Bhadani 10:19, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Commenting

message: User:Indu, reverted your edits as Chinnamasta Bhagawati is not the same goddess as this Chinnamasta. Chinnamasta (Chhinnamasta) is used as a generic name for goddess icons whose heads are broken; but are still worshipped. A similar temple appears in MP, India too (can't remember place). No legend oor iconography links Chinnamasta Bhagawati to the mahavidya. --Redtigerxyz  Talk  16:31, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Chinnamasta Bhagawati]] 

message: User:Ian Rose, a fresh start for this article in FAC would be better. Since the FAC is archived, I am replying to your comments here: 
* "I note several paragraphs finishing with as many as half a dozen citations, which would make verification heavy going -- can you make the referencing a bit more granular?"
: Iconography section is written in summary style. Detailed descriptions of the goddess' iconography are given in each of these references; there is overlap in many of these references, which refer to various primary references (Hindu scriptures); so the 6 book references are given at the end of the paragraphs, instead at the end of each sentence. I have looked at the books and removed a ref.--Redtigerxyz  Talk  17:29, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: "Chhinnamasta appears in two distinct ... " is an opening statement to help a non-expert understand the difference between the 2 sections ahead. 
I request you to waive the 2 week cooling period. Redtigerxyz  Talk  17:08, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, I accept all that -- at any rate I'm happy to leave it to reviewers at a renomination to judge. On the second point, I was also thinking of the uncited sentence "The attendants are absent in some depictions", which doesn't seem to be an introduction to what follows. Pls check that, and then feel free to renominate when you're ready. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 20:25, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks Ian Rose.--Redtigerxyz  Talk  16:31, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replies to Closing comments on FAC 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Chhinnamasta. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160509000043/http://odisha.gov.in/e-magazine/Orissareview/2009/September/engpdf/90.pdf to http://odisha.gov.in/e-magazine/Orissareview/2009/September/engpdf/90.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:26, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Perhaps heroic Tantrikas was meant to be esoteric Tantrikas? DynV (talk) 15:09, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typo? heroic Tantrikas 

message: * Can Tantra Make a Mātā Middle-Class?: Jogaṇī Mātā, a Uniquely Gujarati Chinnamastā.-Nizil (talk) 19:13, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional refs