lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Proof-of-payment

message: I'm proposing that the article, Ticket controller (transportation), be merged into this article as that article lacks significant notability independent of this article's subject, the concept of a proof-of-payment system. This seems a prudent move as the two subjects are so closely related that any source that refers to a Ticket controller will be talking about Proof-of-payment. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 05:42, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Would it not be a lot better to merge Revenue Protection Inspector into ticket controller? They seem to completely overlap. Arsenikk (talk) 15:47, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems like a good idea, I suppose. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 15:51, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I moved the article to ticket controller because I need it as a wikilink, and there is nothing to disambiguate it from. Arsenikk (talk) 16:12, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ticket controller merge 

message: Proof-of-payment has become an extremely common system in the 13 years since this article was created. Maintaining a list of systems that use it is next to impossible, would require literally dozens of citations, and would provide no benefit for the average reader. I propose to cut the list from the article; if we wish to track it, a category can be used instead. The article should only note specific systems when they are relevant to the concept as a whole - for example, where it was pioneered, where the name was coined, and perhaps studies about how it compares to traditional fare collection. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:44, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I endorse the idea wholeheartedly. The list has grown too unwieldy to be useful anymore, and while before listing the systems that used an unusual practice might make sense, this method is so common now that it's not an unusual feature that needs to be noted. oknazevad (talk) 22:56, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of services 

message: This is not necessarily the case. Some systems still require the passenger to go through the front door even though they are not asked to show the ticket. --2001:16B8:3184:3600:D4B9:84E1:AEAD:A6FB (talk) 18:35, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  possible for all doors to be used for boarding
Talk:USS Chung-Hoon

message: "On 12 March, 2009, Fox News reported that Chung-Hoon was escorting USNS Impeccable after the latter had been harassed by Chinese vessels in international waters off Hainan"
The USNS Impeccable was in China's EEZ, which is not considered international waters.  The area beyond EEZ is considered international waters.  Please see wiki entry for EEZ and international water for more info.  -- Adeptitus (talk) 22:38, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: As I said in my edit summary, the pipe is not needed. The reasons for leaving this unpiped are listed in WP:NOPIPE. When you make a change and are reverted, the polite thing to do is discuss it on the talk page. See WP:BRD. The talk page gives you an opportunity to explain when you neglected to leave an explanation in the edit summary. GA-RT-22 (talk) 19:25, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  NOPIPE
Talk:Cytochrome P450 reductase

message: I think that the title of this article is unfortunate. I believe the most common name of this enzyme is "NADPH:cytochrome P450 reductase". NC-IUBMB page for EC 1.6.2.4] lists a number of synonyms, none of them is simply "P450 oxidoreductase". Also, "P450 oxidoreductase" can be confused with P450 itself becasue most of P450s are oxidoreductases. However, IUBMB-recommended common name and systematic name are also not widely used (for example, I even cannot find "NADPH—hemoprotein reductase" or "NADPH:hemoprotein oxidoreductase" in PubMed). Thus I suggest renaming this article to "NADPH:cytochrome P450 reductase". Metalloid 22:02, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "P450 oxidoreductase" is actually a fairly common name for it.  If you do a google search for "P450 oxidoreductase", almost every result is about this protein, and not P450 reactions in general.  It might not be the most accurate name, but it's the one people are most likely to search for. Kiral 09:09, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: I see consensus against moving the page to NADPHcytochrome P450 reductase. I see no consensus for moving the page to cytochrome P450 oxidoreductase. I am closing this to not relist it a 4th time, with no prejudice towards someone speedily opening another RM proposing the latter title. (non-admin closure) Snowmanonahoe (talk · contribs · typos) 14:23, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Cytochrome P450 reductase →  – There has previously been some discussion about the name of this article. According to the style guide for gene and protein articles, the recommended UniProt protein name should be used as the article name. In this case the recommended name for this protein is "NADPH--cytochrome P450 reductase." Dh92 (talk) 17:22, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Molecular Biology has been notified of this discussion. Natg 19 (talk) 01:43, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

text: Relisting comment: Relisted for discussion on the proposed title of "cytochrome P450 oxidoreductase" Captain Jack Sparrow (talk) 11:49, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 3 May 2023
Talk:Neapolitan War

message: I am skeptical that this picture is appropriate. The article doesn't talk about fighting between Neapolitans and French. Probably it is from the initial French invasion of Naples. Chymicus (talk) 04:55, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. Nothing in file description shows it is really picture about 1815 events. Source page lists "1799" among keywords.Pavlor (talk) 22:12, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Article Parthenopean Republic may be better suited for this image.Pavlor (talk) 22:19, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Heroic resistance of the Neopolitan people against the French" 
Talk:Lime TV

message: The history of the WTV network is independent from the Lime efforts to continue it's mission.
The acquisition of the brief-lived network is not the story of Wisdom's short life. Nor should it be a advertisement for Lime's noble and genuine efforts. The two subjects are separate.
 == Attempted to remove bias ==
I have edited this article in an attempt to remove the bias that caused it to read like an advertisement. I have also updated it to reflect that the television network has gone off the air. Because of these changes and because there has been no discussion regarding this page thus far, I have removed the "advert" tag, but I certainly have no qualms putting it back in if there is a consensus that bias still remains.
Arclight2012 19:36, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:House of Fun

message: "While the song was being recorded, head of Stiff Records Dave Robinson insisted that the song should have a chorus, so band member Mike Barson immediately wrote the "Welcome to the House of Fun" refrain on his piano."
As was agreed by the participants in the Madness edition of BBC Radio 4's The Reunion (being broadcast as I type), the lyrics of the hurriedly written refrain are by Suggs. Harfarhs (talk) 10:33, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chorus
Talk:MKS units

message: Does the BIPM or any other authority provide a modern definition of the mks system of units?  If the mks system of units never had a governing body to rule on a standard definition then the list of mks units might depend on different conventions and different times.  For example a "cycle" may or may not have been a unit in the mks system prior to its exclusion from the International System of Units.  At least one journal article in a peer-reviewed journal uses the term "cycles/second". See p. 347 of  "Magnetic Formulae Expressed in the M. K. S. System of Units" by A. E. Kennelly in Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society v. 76, p. 343 (1936)  --John David Wright 20:10, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If I'm not mistaken (& I wouldn't be too greatly surprised if I were), the SI is an mks system (the metre, kilogram & second are base units in the SI) and thus the BIPM does provide a modern definition. JIMp talk·cont 16:19, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Modern definition

message: The text says "An incomplete list of the base and derived units appears below."  It isn't there now.  Where did it go?  SkoreKeep (talk) 20:56, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Table? Where?
Talk:Revetment

message: Before merging with "Riprap", I try with just a link from Riprap to this page, after having put sea revetments at the top of the page. 
 
Furthermore, "Freshwater revetment" does not make a lot of sense to me, hence I added a link to the Riprap page. I feel that "Sea revetment" would be a nice stand alone page and that the military aspects could be merged with Seacoast Defense (US).Artreve 15:07, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the merge tag, six weeks there, no consensus to merge. --Duk 20:14, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Second Philippine Republic

message: Hi. The Military history of the Philippines during World War II article is very sketchy and on its page there is a red link for an article about the Japanese occupation of the Philippines (1941-1945) a very important subject that is still needed as there are already articles about: the Japanese occupation of Burma; Japanese occupation of Hong Kong; Japanese occupation of Indonesia; Japanese occupation of Malaya, North Borneo and Sarawak and Japanese occupation of Singapore, so this gap is glaring. Anyone with and interest or expertise in this topic is welcome to start writing it. Thank you, IZAK (talk) 11:41, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needed: Japanese occupation of the Philippines (1941-1945) 

message: The Bureau of Constabulary, the military force of the Second Philippine Republic, is not mentioned in this article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.177.218.22 (talk) 09:34, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  BC 

message: This republic was recognized by the folowing countries:  Burma, China (Wang Ching Wei republic), Japan, Manchukuo, Thailand, Bulgaria, Croatia, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Italy, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, and Vichy France.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.203.82.19 (talk) 10:44, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Info about that probably should be added to the article, but a supporting source would need to be cited. According to these Google Books search results,  says that it was recognized by "Italy, Germany, Vichy France, Spain, Denmark, Bulgaria, ..." and perhaps some others not named there. I have not seen a paper or online copy of that source page, and I haven't been able to find an altenative source online. Wtmitchell  (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 18:57, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  International recognition 

message: The Food Shortages section mentions of a typhoon in November 1943, however the Wikipedia page 1941–44_Pacific_typhoon_seasons doesn't list any Typhoon in November 1943. Which is correct?
Kevink707 (talk) 17:19, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know where the info in the 1941–44 Pacific typhoon seasons came from, but some googling turned up  and Wtmitchell  (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 19:40, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  November 1943 typhoon? 

message: I saw this edit, and it caused me to wonder about the flag. I see the following in the Flag of the Philippines article:
This is mainly a Wikidata Philippines concern, but the people able to address it are probably editors of this article.
The immediate question relevant here is whether the flag shown is the flag of the puppet government. It should be, as that is the article topic.
The wider Wikidata question is how this case of a country having separate governments dispiting sovereignty during a time period should be handled there. Wtmitchell  (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 00:42, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flag
Talk:Gareth Armstrong

message: Is this the same actor who did a one-man show on Shylock at the Perry Street Theatre in Manhattan in 2005? RahadyanS 19:54, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Shylock?
Talk:OWL-S

message: I have created a new article in the temp page to solve the copyright problem. Would someone please take a look in this page to see is the problem is solved now, and give me some feedback?
--Gtondello 19:55, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Talk:OWL-S/Temp looks good to me at the first glance, thank you for your effort. The lead section left me scratching my head, but that can be sorted out later. -- intgr 20:05, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I'll wait for the Administrator to move the article into place, then I can try to review the lead section. --Gtondello 12:39, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Can't Buy My Love

message: I noticed that for the Oricon yearly album charting, it said number nine, but Wiki's Oricon page states that it was number eight, with a source included. I am changing it. Miraeille | Talk to me~ 16:29, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Yearly album charting?
Talk:Placostylus bollonsi arbutus

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 ISBN 0-00-216906-1. It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  -- ascidian | talk-to-me 13:47, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Placostylus bollonsi bollonsi

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 ISBN 0-00-216906-1. It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  -- ascidian | talk-to-me 13:36, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Placostylus bollonsi caperatus

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 ISBN 0-00-216906-1. It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  -- ascidian | talk-to-me 13:35, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Placostylus hongii

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 . It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  -- ascidian | talk-to-me 13:34, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Triplofusus giganteus

message: Note:  The taxonomy for this species has changed and needs to reflect Genus Triplofusus as per WoRMS AphiaID: 420051.  It needs the species name changed on the title of the article.Shellnut (talk) 16:49, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This has now been done. Invertzoo (talk) 22:39, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like the Triplofusus papillosus is a "taxon inquirendum" in WoRMS, and Triplofuscus giganteus is accepted. —Hyperik ⌜talk⌟ 18:43, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Unable to move the page name to reflect the renaming in 2018 to Triplofuscus giganteus as indicated above! If someone could do that, please, I think the rest is correct. Vanityclear (talk) 13:13, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: A note
Talk:Poirieria zelandica

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 . It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  -- ascidian | talk-to-me 13:24, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Jeffrey K. Zeig

message: This smells strongly of copyvio, but I couldn't find it online. --Fang Aili talk 20:01, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Johnny Kapahala: Back on Board

message: "In the first movie Kapahala is spelled with two A's as seen in the final credits. The change was probably to make the name seem simpler and therefore better advertised."
: Maybe they changed it because they realised in hawaiian if the name was spelled Kapahaala, it would be pronounced KA-PA-HA-AH-LA, not KA-PA-HA-LA (Kapahala) which they intended. Coojah 07:25, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name Change 

message: The actor for Troy's link goes to the now-dead actor of Owen Lars in Star Wars Episode IV. - Presidentman 15:00, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Damn it, I miss the days when the SAG would say 'ONE name, ONE actor!'  He is Phil Brown, but I don't know the precedent for two actors with the same name.  Gotta research! -- Ipstenu (talk • contribs) 15:13, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Actor for Troy 

message: I don't see the need for this piece of trivia since it has nothing to do with the movie itself. I was going to remove it but I wanted to see what others think in regards to this. 203.211.119.19 (talk) 01:28, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia 
Talk:List of Olympic medalists in ice hockey

message: This is my first post here.  Be gentle.
The current text reads:
"Three male athletes have won four medals: Vladislav Tretiak (three gold, one silver), Igor Kravchuk (two gold, one silver, one bronze) and Jiří Holík (two silver, two bronze)."
Three Finns won their fourth medal at the 2010 Winter Olympics in Vancouver: Sako Koivu, Ville Peltonen and Jere Lehtinen.  They should now be added to the four-medal list.  All won in 1994, 1998, 2006 and 2010 (one silver, three bronze).  The fact that each has won four medals can be checked from the list of medalists on the page at issue.
Thanks for your attention.
Imnles (talk) 11:41, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Four-medal winners 

message: I think there is an error on the roster, Tim Regan (ice hockey) does not appear on the roster section on Ice hockey at the 1972 Winter Olympics, nor does he appear on the roster on the List of United States national ice hockey team rosters, he is not in either of the two references for that page here and here. The only reason I have not removed him yet is because this is a Featured Article, however I have one more reference that I can check and if I can't verify he is on the team through that last one I will delete him, unless some one can show me a reference that says he was there.
:I looked into it and He was part of the "team" but not on the declared roster. He left the team to return to Boston University for the NCAA playoffs. However he was still given a Silver Medal.--Mo Rock...Monstrous (talk) 23:42, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  1972 Team USA
Talk:Messiah (Starling novel)

message: Where is the article for the Gore Vidal novel? I'm confused.
:Hasn't been written yet. RJFJR (talk) 20:52, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

message: Moved from article to talk.  No context.  Doesn't seem useful to the reader. RJFJR (talk) 20:52, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: The Victims