Talk:Talossan language

message: * Delete. A stub about the fictional language of a fictional place.  RickK 02:33, 3 Nov 2003 (UTC)
thread_title:  VfD 

message: It's a bit late now, but I just realized that in that vote I cast in November I confused Talossan with Taneraic. VV 07:27, 5 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion 

message: A bot on the Dutch Wikipedia just came to the conclusion that the first of the links, http://my.execpc.com/~talossa/glhetg.html, is dead. Is that a temporary thing or should it be removed from the article? —IJzeren Jan  In mij legge alle fogultjes een ij 22:55, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed that link as it will never links to a page in the future since its editor, BEn Madison, has (hopefuly) cut his links with Talossa. --Elistir 12:28, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Using What to do when a reference link "goes dead" as guidance, I replaced the dead link with a link to an archived version.  Also, since Wikipedia apparently frowns on links to message boards, I replaced both forum links with links to each Talossa's language reference page. PubliusFL 22:42, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link 

message: the article does not cite any independent sources that confirm the notability of the langauge and correctness of info about it. An article with sources only from language developers/fans is qualified as original research. `'mikka (t) 19:53, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: yes, imho the article should be deleted after all. Especially as it shows no sign of improving. It can always be recreated with proper references. dab (ᛏ) 23:04, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original research 

message: I guess it counts as an independent source?
:It certainly does. Thank you for that! —IJzeren Jan  Uszkiełtu? 14:58, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Here is a link to a list of artificial languages composed by a real academic, Dr Richard Kennaway of the University of East Anglia. Richard Kennayay's Constructed Language List It looks like the page was last updated in 1997, so the links are not all correct, but the information looks spot on.--Wyattt 22:33, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The problem is that the list is just that - a list.  And most of the entries on that list are clearly not notable.  The article as it stands does assert notability, and the Wired article substantiates the key elements of the article.  But it'd be nice to have another reliable source cited. PubliusFL 00:17, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Would this link help..? 

message: See Talk:Talossa#Merger of Talossan language. PubliusFL 19:59, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merger into [[Talossa]]

message: I just added the post-arestada translation of the Shelley poem, along with a tidbit about the fact that the arestada happened-Aashalom (talk) 04:49, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Arestada

message: I added the flag of the language to the page. Aashalom (talk) 05:02, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: El Grishun

message: Aashalom (talk) 13:38, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Added; the table of Romance languages

message: strange letter combinations
Perhaps 'strange' should be changed to 'unusual' or 'unorthodox'? EoinMahon (talk) 16:06, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strange vs Unusual 

message: Added a reference and link to the only in-print book on the language.--Agbdavis (talk) 21:38, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  References