lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Motorway 1 (Greece)

message: The term Interstate is a specific term for highways built by the US Federal Government, and as such a US-specific term. The name is derived from the Latin inter - between and the word state, because Interstate highways connect the states of the USA. There are no states in Greece, so the word Interstate does not make any sense here. No other English-speaking country uses this term, not Canada, not the UK. Andreas 04:25, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: We should rename the article (and all other Gr. Motorway) to fit the other "roads in Europe" articles. Autovía and Autopista in Spain , Autoroute in France, Bundesautobahn in Germany. So how will it be named? The gr. name transliterated is "Avtokinitodromos" or better "Aftokinitodromos". So should we go for  Aftokinitodromos 1 or something like Greek Motorway A1??Yangula (talk) 16:21, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The terminology is fine as it is. Those countries you are referring to have a long history of motorway development and the localized terms for "motorway" have found established usage in the English-speaking world when the subject needs to be referenced. "Aftokinitodromos" is not an established English term. --Dead3y3 (talk) 21:55, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  I agree that "motorway" is a better term for this article. But autovia, autopista, autoroute, and budesautobahn are most certainly not "established English terms". I would make the exception only for plain "autobahn".76.10.141.182 (talk) 17:12, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 
Talk:1992 cageless shark-diving expedition

message: While this needs some cleanup and wikification, but the facts appear to check out.  See the following:
Sharkman: Ron, if I remember correctly, you were the first to Freedive with Great Whites during the filming of "Blue Wilderness" episode "Shark Shocker" in South Africa.
Ron: As far as I know we were the first to dive with Great Whites without a cage when shooting Blue Wilderness series at Dyer Island in South Africa. Our cage had been lost during a storm, so we had no choice. Four of us went in with the Whites, Valerie, myself, George Askew and another South African whos name escapes me at the moment.
I had dived previously with Whites outside the cage in South Australia, but no more than 5-10 meters from the cage. 
From here http://www.sharkmans-world.com/rv.htm 
I removed the unverified tag.
--circuitloss 04:25, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ace with the verification. With regards to cleanup, which bit specifically needs clean-up, i can't particularly see that much to clean-up. i removed the link to Askew's website, because it doesnt appear to be relevant, and was added by User:Georgea, so possible advertisement. i am also quite worried about the title, i put it under that title because that was the best i could think of, but its still not good. aside from that though, the article doesnt seem that "unclean", could you give a more specific idea of what you think should be cleaned up? Jdcooper 14:18, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

text: I added an introductory sentance to conform a little more closely with accepted style guidelines.  Removed the cleanup tag.  --circuitloss 16:44, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: First Look Checks Out

message: Seems mergable, but that might be my perception, I am not an expert on the subject. People Powered 04:08, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I do not agree, sure can be merged, but GWS page should not be cluttered with one shark diving expidition, this expedition and others like the Blue Water, White Death' expedition (dont look we do not have any page about it yet as far as I know) should probably be merged into one article but I do not agree with merging this into GWS. Stefan 05:47, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Dr. No (novel)

message: The "Three Blind Mice" that killed Strangways and his secretary--and are in turn blown away by Bond before he buries Dr. No alive--are not mentioned in the plot summary. Is it okay if I add mentions of them?TH1980 (talk) 05:25, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not needed: this is a summary, so not every detail I shall needed. - SchroCat (talk) 05:43, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Assassins Are Not Mentioned?
Talk:R. Palme Dutt

message: At present there is no mention of Clemens Palme Dutt - Rajani Palme Dutt's brother and political cohort. There is also no Wikipedia page for Clemens Palme Dutt, who like Rajani, was a prominent member of the Communist Party of Great Britain, although he kept to a more discreet role than Rajani, as evidenced by the MI5 files on both Rajani and Clemens. Would someone be good enough to set up the appropriate page for Clemens Palme Dutt please. Jonathan Rackowe, grandson of Clemens Palme Dutt. 5.228.81.130 (talk) 14:13, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Clemens Palme Dutt - Rajani Palme Dutt's brother and political cohort

message: "After Stalin's death Dutt remained a loyal Stalinist". Apparently he supported Khrushchev's denunciation though attempting to downplay it with his "spots on the sun" speech. So this is a bit misleading. The telescoping of history (where 1956 slides into 1968) is characteristic of much historiography about Communism and is also misleading. Could do with more detail.--Jack Upland 04:27, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Dutt as Stalinist

message: The item currently includes a lengthy excerpt from a review of Dutt's book "Fascism and Social Revolution", lavishly praising "Dutt's genius". Somebody already added a "who?" tag to this quote, and some Googling reveals that it's, in fact, from an anonymous user review on Amazon.com by "A Customer". This does not strike me as a worthy source for an encyclopedic item, and I propose the quote is taken out. No-itsme (talk) 16:57, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Lengthy citation of anonymous praise

message: The critiques of Hyman Levy, 'The Philosophy of a Natural Scientist' and 'The Philosophy of a Natural Scientist - Rejoinder' were actually written by Clemens, rather than Rajani, Palme Dutt. Levy's reply, accessible here - https://www.marxists.org/history/international/comintern/sections/britain/periodicals/labour_monthly/1938/05/natural_scientist_reply.htm confirms that it is addressed to Clemens, rather than Rajani. 
- I'll edit it accordingly to remove these. 81.101.15.21 (talk) 23:08, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misattribution of Clemens' works to Rajani
Talk:Gary Peters (footballer)

message: The League Managers Association profile has date of birth as 03/08/1954, not 14/11/1954?.
My mistake. The LMA date is correct. I've corrected the article's error.  Slumgum 12:47, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: DOB

message: Peters was NOT responsible for changing Preston NE's style to short passing from long-ball. John Beck did that at Chesterfield on November 26 1994 shortly before his resignation.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.199.5.157 (talk • contribs) 
:The LMA profile says Peters is responsible. It is quite a claim to suggest the club's style was changed in one game, but I respect your claim enough to alter the article.  It does not now suggest that Peters instigated the change, rather that the Beck style had been long ball and the Peters style was passing. Ironic that Peters is now credited with the reverse at Shrewsbury.  Sʟυмgυм • т • c  19:18, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Style of play
Talk:Captain Confederacy

message: This article seems to be a little slanted.  I'd change it, but I don't know anything about the comic.
--65.67.76.237 04:33, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 
Talk:Tracking

message: Why is logistics/tracing mentioned, if it's not directly related to tracking?  --Interiot 17:31, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Tracking, a subject of reckoning, concerning setting up a track on other objects momentarily viewed from the observer's own location  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.18.90.49 (talk) 12:11, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  where is this? 

message: It seems like these two are treated interchangibly on their respective pages (motion tracking is listed on "tracker" but "object motion tracking" is listed on tracker. People don't seem to differentiate so we should merge them. CombatWombat42 (talk) 16:47, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[tracker]]
Talk:List of television series based on comic strips

message: The introduction to this list makes no sense. What on earth is a "television strip?" 23skidoo 04:39, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Apparently someone cut and pasted some text and forgot to alter it accordingly before saving the article. I have requested a merge for it.♥ Her Pegship♥ 06:21, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Joe Pool Lake

message: The article says construction began when the dam was completed, wouldn't construction have started when the dam itself was begun? (Whenever that may have been)  For that matter, the bridges over the lake (Lake Ridge Parkway?) were in place before the dam was completed, and I'm guessing that farms, cemeteries etc. were moved out of the way well ahead of time. -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 03:57, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess it is a matter of defining the starting point being the building of the damn or the digging of the lake itself. DMN only goes back to 1985 for news articles (unless you jump back to 1977) and there is no mention of damn construction, only that the lake began to fill in jan of 1986. I would love to get more information prior to this, but can't seem to find any. I do know that the planning of the lake started around 1979.
Jaymzyates 02:50, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: updated cedar hill state park's camping fees to $20 as it says on the website http://www.cedarhillstatepark.org/Recreation/camping.html  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.212.188.46 (talk) 19:00, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Camping fees 

message: Prior content in this  duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.tangleridge.com/guest-welcome. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Gyrofrog  (talk) 16:00, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Amy Winfrey

message: Ms. Winfrey has nearly 1,000 Google hits, and is notable in her area. Beyond that, there is not much I can say; Wikipedia has too many critics, watchdogs, deletionists and cybercops, and not enough writers.
In my day we used to say "too many chiefs, not enough Indians." -- Cecropia 17:49, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: I added south park to amy winfry cartoons. because she animated the first seven episodes. does it have anything to do with south park rights to her?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.243.19.150 (talk) 01:26, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: How is this possible? Given the dates listed, she would've been 13. - 76.224.25.56 (talk) 22:11, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Most likely someone made up the birth date listed, so I removed it. --ThaddeusB (talk) 19:05, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  South Park 

message: What influenced Amy Winfrey's works? I bet her influences include The Nightmare Before Christmas, Monty Python, Aardman Animations, Jim Henson, Don Hertzfeldt, Yellow Submarine, Underground comix, and Mad. But really, what WERE her influences? FlapjackRulez (talk) 16:35, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Influences?
Talk:The Unforgiven II

message: The Unforgiven II has been preformed more than once
In the above link, I believe by "band" they are not referring to themselves, but by the marching band present at the airport that greeted them by playing The Unforgiven II. This can be seen in this YouTube clip: . As such, I think the article should be modified to say that they only played the song once. Perwisky (talk) 14:24, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Beechwood, Michigan

message: Does anybody have any idea exactly what the 'boundaries' of Beechwood are?  Aside from the Beechwood Church and the Beechwood Inn, I have never seen any evidence of a unique, differentiable community at this site.
:The Census Bureau, in cooperation with local officials, defined the area as in this map for the 2000 census. older≠wiser 13:20, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Monad (Technocracy)

message: I did a quick job on the article. I will one day return to fill things out. Trfs 05:26, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

message: Any hints on the origin of the Monad? It smells alchemy to me Arivero 13:23, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin? 

message: I deleted the reference to Voivod, as it didn't seem to have any connection with the topic of the article whatsoever and wasn't even properly linked. Irritator (talk) 08:00, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Voivod? 

message: I seems way to big to fit into an article. Could it be shrunk in half or shrunk two thirds?skip sievert (talk) 23:28, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: What about the size of this thing?

message: An editor recently redirected this page to another page. This article covers a notable thing that is well known and needs an encyclopedic entry. It appears that the redirect would deprive people of more direct information here as to the origin of this logo symbol. Please discuss a serious redirect like that before doing. skip sievert (talk) 18:13, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: that redirect was correct, and I have re-established it. This particular symbol as a symbol of the organization is not independently significant by any stretch of the imagination. The alternative is to ask for it to be deleted entirely, and the redirect is preferred. I usually like to take the conservative course.  DGG ( talk ) 00:24, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: How is it conservative to redirect an article that has a lot of information about a notable social group from the early thirties, 18 card carring members of which, were later involved in the Cabinet of F.D.R.,? that was the fastest growing social movement of the time, and claimed 500.000 members in California alone? Scroll down to the Technocracy section in this official Social Security History website, here, and you can see a picture of the Monad. How is it that you have determined by statement of fact, without any other explanation that the organizations symbol is not independently significant..? and how is it that the argument is... this way or deletion? Given those things would you be willing to reinstate the article? skip sievert (talk) 03:25, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

text: I can not imagine   restoring this--the significant material -- what you refer to above -- is every bit of it in the redirected article. There is no third party indication of significance of the symbol. Frankly, the only viable alternative to redirection is deletion.    DGG ( talk ) 19:37, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect
Talk:George Rich

message: I am baffled by the reference to Rich J writing in Isaacs v McKinnon simply "appeal dismissed". If you access this link you will clearly see that Rich J wrote much more than just appeal dismissed. I am wondering where the trivia quiz that is cited got this info? If someone can't back up this information then I propose to remove the entire reference to the Isaacs v McKinnon case. --Shadow007 05:50, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the reference to Rich writing "appeal dismissed". I'm not sure where the quiz was sourced from, although it was published on a UNSW Law Faculty page. Given that they misspelt the other judge's name (they called Clyne Klyne) the rest of it may not be accurate. I've left in the preceding sentence though, that's sourced from Dixon's papers, and clearly attributed to Dixon. --bainer (talk) 08:48, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm quite happy with that. Cheers.--Shadow007 13:14, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lovely Football Association

message: Is this a hoax? -- Mikeblas 05:52, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It would seem not, but there is a case to be made that it's a joke taken rather a little too seriously :-) It all stems from a TV show (that I haven't seen, due to not having a TV :)). --kingboyk 06:14, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Consequently have proposed this article for deletion. --MLD 10:54, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Pedro Infante

message: The beginning section says 'he did NOT pilot himself', but later in the article is says 'He was piloting a Consolidated Aircraft....which crashed 5 minutes after take-off from Mérida, Yucatán'. This is obviously contradictory. Which is correct? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.162.98.189 (talk) 02:19, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Pilot or not?

message: Hansnesse:
It is a rumor, and it is unverified the fact that he is dead, but I've just added the FACT that the rumor exists and that it is based on a character (VERIFIABLE), and a video of him (I have seen it). And also added the comment that it is most likely that this ANTONIO PEDRO character is using his resemblance with Pedro Infante for personal profit.
I strongly beleive that this must remain in the article, for when I saw the video I just ran into wikipedia for a confirmation / dismissal of this rumor, so if we just know that the rumor exists, it should remain as a FACT that it does. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.65.47.36 (talk) 14:42, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: RE: Not dead?

message: I reverted to remove the section (verbatim)
:Some say Pedro is not dead , there´s a video of a 70 year old man singing and he resembles him almos exaclt , it is said that he currenly resides on Delicis , Chihuahua
I don't have any particular knowedge of this man, but removed it since there does not seem to be a source, and seems to be an urban ledgend.  --Hansnesse 06:01, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Not dead?

message: I restored the early version, with a photograph and precision of Infante´s today popularity. What pretends 24.186.129.191 erasing a better version of article?
posmodern2000 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Posmodern2000 (talk • contribs) 21:47, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Restoring

message: He is dead. All source articles cite his death. Rumor on article removed. Wikipedia is not rumor control and without verifiable citations, statements should not be added to articles.  Ronbo76 16:21, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: He is dead

message: I have a picture of a plaque dedicated to the house where he was born and for the 50th anniversary to his death. IDK whether they would be of any use to this article so please inform me so I can pass them on.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.132.42.58 (talk) 01:58, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Pictures
Talk:Koshien Stadium

message: Ok, it says that the leftfield stands are normally empty, yet it also says the stadium's frequently filled to capacity. If there are any experts on Japanese Baseball, please correct this apparent contradiction. karmafist 06:04, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't get that interpretation at all. The article says that visiting teams' fans normally sit in left field but at Koshien they rarely make up more than one section. Hence the rest of the seats are full of Tigers fans, not empty. I am removing the "contradictory" banner. --Do Not Talk About Feitclub (contributions) 18:18, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Attendance

message: I will be actively working over the next couple of months to get some good citations on this page, and on Hanshin Tigers.  I would encourage your help!  Let's make this article better. Vir4030 19:49, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations 

message: Was the stadium really inspirated by the Polo Grounds, and not by the Wrigley Field? I'm just asking because people told me about Wrigley, but never the Polo Grounds. Correct me if I'm wrong 89.196.15.126 (talk) 13:18, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Really after Polo Grounds? not after the Wrigley Field
Talk:Innuendos from Rocko's Modern Life

message: Image or No Image??
-Tvaughn05 06:05, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: Perhaps we should remove the word "Interesting" from the title...
-Tvaughn05 06:06, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove "'''Interesting'''"
Talk:His Dark Materials (film)

message: No merge.  Already has a fairly controvertial history, so the information should probably be preserved.  If this much information were in the destination article, I'd propose splitting it.  --AySz88^-^ 06:05, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with [[His Dark Materials]]?

message: I believe these two should be merged for now.  If they do decide to make a film out of the subtle knife we can create a seperate page for that SirGrant 05:21, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with [[His Dark Materials: The Golden Compass]]?
Talk:Gestell

message: I thought there needed to be an article here on Gestell, at least as conceived of by Heidegger. I am no expert on Heidegger, but I added in a few sentances so as to get this going. I have never created an article before (only edited), and am not completely familiar with wiki etiquette, so I apologize if I might have gone off format.
I feel that the notion of gestell is sufficiently important in Heidegger's work so as to merit the creation of a wikipedia article on it. Kevin L. 06:06, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

message: I'm just putting some references here that might be useful for improving the main article. --RichardVeryard (talk) 02:22, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: Someone has added a note about Claudio Ciborra, but this needs expanding. I added a couple of others, Giorgio Agamben, Albert Borgmann, obviously needs more work here. And I need to find time to put in the references I found last time I looked at this article. --RichardVeryard (talk) 18:21, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Later uses of the concept 