lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Agile modeling

message: This article says what agile modeling is intended for. Says something about critique, limitations and that it can be used with other things. It does not state what agile modeling is.Pukkie 12:21, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What is agile modeling?

message: It's also known as mental farting. Suppose you want to earn crazy money as a consulant. Use agile farting to create a huge amount of wikipedia entries to bolster the agile mindset backspine. WHAT?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.72.251.137 (talk) 09:07, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Anyone know Agile Farting?

message: Aside from the obviously declared connection of a major contributor to this article and its content, I think some of the content of this article needs to be critically examined. E.g. the lead: "This methodology is more flexible than traditional modeling methods, making it a better fit in a fast changing environment." A better fit than what, for what situation, and why is it a better fit? At present, this article reads like an advertisement in order to sell a product, not like a neutral Wikipedia article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7F:9CDD:5000:5035:297C:3B3D:5B0C (talk) 11:11, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality?
Talk:Picture cover

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot 12:23, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-02-8 Automated pywikipediabot message 

message: What is the difference between this and casebinding? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bookbinding doesn't even mention it. Since it's an orphan it doesn't seem like this is a term used very often and I've never come across it when reading about bookbinding.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.43.31.141 (talk) 18:39, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  this is not a common term
Talk:Amyntas IV of Macedon

message: '...He was born in about 365 BC.[5]
After his father’s death in 359 BC he became king, but he was only an infant.....'
.
Perhaps this is worthy of an independent article on the oldest infant that ever lived???
70.171.44.124 (talk) 15:16, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Too true,  70.171.44.124, and now that eight years have passed since your pithy observation I have decided to fix this error which appears in the somewhat obsolete 150-year-old Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology. I'm changing "an infant" to "a child". Blanchette (talk) 22:35, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  An infant over five years old!
Talk:Code Red II (computer worm)

message: In the article it is mentioned that Microsoft released a patch for the CodeRed Worm II on a date earlier than the mentioned virus release date. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stevag (talk • contribs) 12:25, February 8, 2007
: Yeah, Code Red II exploited a security hole in IIS.  Microsoft had previously released a security patch for the hole in IIS.  The problem was not everyone had installed the patch... AlistairMcMillan 17:42, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Updated the article, so hopefully this is clear.  AlistairMcMillan 17:51, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

text: To Get rid of it you must disconnect your computer from the internet and must restart your computer then get the next patch.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.144.225.137 (talk) 18:20, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Dates?
Talk:Antipatrid dynasty

message: Sosthenes was actually a general who took command due to the inabillity of others to lead the army effectivly. However, he wasn't a member of a royal house. Atlantia (talk) 07:40, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sosthenes 

message: Didn't Cassander de facto rule Macedonia for over a decade before officially taking the title of "king?" By that I mean, when did this dynasty actually begin? 2601:193:8201:711F:248E:8820:C5C7:CE24 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 01:18, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cassander
Talk:Antipater I of Macedon

message: Actually he is Antipater I, because the next with the same name is Antipater Etesias is numbered Antipater II. The misconseption comes from the previous Antipater regent of the Macedonian Empire; maybe someone considers Antipater I (?). Please someone correct the wrong name of this page, from Antipater II to Antipater I. Aris de Methymna (talk) 18:36, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Antipater I
Template talk:Hilbert's problems

message: Um, what does this template do that is not achieved by :Category:Hilbert's problems? -- ALoan (Talk) 12:27, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This naviation box template is to navigate between different (yet related) articles easily and much faster than category. Chongkian (talk) 13:15, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Benefit?
Talk:Antigonid dynasty

message: In section Legacy it reads "It was one of four dynasties established by Alexander's successors, the others being the Seleucid dynasty, Ptolemaic dynasty and Attalid dynasty" Why are the kingdoms of Kassandros and Lysimachus as well as some of the smaller kingdoms were excluded ? Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 14:58, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other dynasties 

message: I've found this map which shows the boundaries of the dynasty/empire in context: http://mappinghistory.uoregon.edu/europe/static/map09.html
Rights for the image: https://www.loc.gov/item/2003621520/
It would be a big help if someone else can add it, I don't have time atm to find out how to do so.
-Dean  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.152.26.190 (talk) 05:25, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map
Talk:Mike Tatsugawa

message: 1. What years was Mike Tatsugawa chairman of Anime Expo, and what years was he not? I know he was SPJA Prez for a long time and the public voice of Expo/SPJA, but he wasn't AX Chair every single year. Jennifer Au and Albert Wong were at least two others that alternated with him.
2. A decent pic of Mike that can be legitimately placed on this page.
3. Help cleaning up the citations.
4. Anything else that's relevant to Mike T.
Kensuke Aida 12:31, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Information Needed....
Talk:Railway electric traction

message: Railway electric traction is about the traction units that operate on a railway electrification system. 
A railway electrification system is the infrastructure that allow electric traction to operate. IMHO, they are quite different, and both merit separate articles.  Any cross-over of content between the two should be avoided. ALECTRIC451 21:45, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A further point, an electric locomotive is a subset of railway electric traction, another being electric multiple units.  The article railway electric traction is meant to pull together all the different forms of railway traction that uses electricity as the power source for propulsion. ALECTRIC451 21:49, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  If any merging is needed then it should be between this article and Traction power network ALECTRIC451 23:55, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Justification

message: I can somewhat understand some of this, though Googling tends to show to me that the present term is used for discussion of the field as a whole, and that railway electrification system tends to be used for the power distribution aspect.
It seems to me that we should merge traction power network into railway electrification system. Mangoe 14:15, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur.Sheepcot 22:12, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It could be a subsection (railway electrification system) in until its gets expanded to be split (again) as we haven't hit page length limits. Pickle 15:56, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Continuing merger discussion
Talk:Mercury Monterey

message: Which Mercury had the retractable rear window which was sloped the wrong way ? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 58.107.18.14 (talk) 12:37, 8 February 2007
:The Breezeway window came on the Monterey from '63 to '67 (I think) and on the Montclair and Park Lane from '64 to '67. --Sable232 14:46, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: The breezway sedans were produced from '63 through 66. There was no such model in 67, although the parklane brougham had a conventional rear window which would retract about three inches for ventilation. Busceda (talk) 00:12, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Guess again
Talk:Milesian tale

message: I don't think Cupid & Psyche is a Milesian tale. There are other stories in the Golden Ass that are much more Milesian.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.7.35.54 (talk) 17:05, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cupid and Psyche 
Talk:Thirty Tyrants

message: Even before the rule of The Thirty, Athens did not universally extend the privilege to participate in governance (slaves and women were not enfranchised, for example). The city was ruled by 'politeia' which the scholar Alan Bloom likens to the Ancien Regime (Bloom 'The Republic of Plato', Second Edition (1991) p. 440). ~~  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.174.89.204 (talk) 14:09, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Factual Errors 

message: Nearly all of the linked names are either to different people of the same name (eg Sophocles and Erastothenes), another is a family in rome, yet another redirects to a genus of butterfly.  Not really sure right now how to redlink properly; I'll try to figure it out later.  Theotherkg 03:06, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link Errors 

message: In the "aftermath" section it mentions the thirty, then two other groups of 11 and 10, with the 10 stated to be in Piraeus.  However these groupings are again mentioned in the next section, but there it instead says it is the 11 who were in charge of Piraeus.  One of these statements clearly must have gotten it mixed up.--68.92.95.94 (talk) 05:41, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Obvious inconsistency
Talk:Codrus

message: has repeately removed content claiming that it is sourced to Wikipedia rather than the actual source cited in the article. The source is clearly cited in the article to the Constitution of Athen. Sundayclose (talk) 13:45, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit warring on sourced content 

message: @Sundayclose PaUZz LYte (talk) 21:45, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: You simply resumed your previous edit warring (for which you were blocked) with no additional reliable sourcing and no consensus. Once again, I'm not getting into a pissing contest with you. Get consensus or drop the stick and move on. Sundayclose (talk) 22:21, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why?
Talk:Eurysthenes

message: The Heraclids were named from Heracles. The Perseids were named from Perseus. The Agiads were named from Agis. The father of Agis cannot be an Agiad as then he would be his own grandpaw. "I'm my own grandpaw, I'm my own grandpaw, ..."Dave (talk) 00:46, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Eurysthenes not an Agiad
Talk:DARDO

message: The article claims that the effective range of Phalanx CIWS is better than for Goalkeeper. This can only be true (Goalkeeper has a much more powerful gun) if the subcalibre projectile (12.7mm) is meant for Phalanx. The Dardo's effective range is also a bit on the optimistic end. Lastdingo (talk) 20:35, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: the table is probably wrong, but the Dardo much heavier round probably give it the longer range; i've many doubt that a small 12,7mm round can go maintain its speed more of the Goalkeeper  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Francomemoria (talk • contribs) 20:59, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Effective range in table 

message: Was does AA means in the Info-Box??? --176.199.14.240 (talk) 01:21, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abbrv.?? 

message: please add Turkey to the map of operators 1mpossible c (talk) 17:45, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Operator Turkey
Talk:Leonidas II

message: The claim "Leonidas II was raised at the Persian Court" is implausible, given that the Persian Court was extinguished by Alexander the Great in 329 B.C.  Should this be "Seleucid Court", with a reference to its Persian heritage?  Deipnosophista (talk) 11:15, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Persian Court?
Talk:Bahula

message: The coordinates used here are those of Andal. Please replace them with the actual ones. -- P.K.Niyogi 13:19, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Coordinates of Durgapur now being used. - P.K.Niyogi 12:39, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Coordinates
Talk:Hack Green Secret Nuclear Bunker

message: nuclear bunker you tube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fKaIbKIN1tc
:The bunker in that video is at Skendleby, not Hack Green. --Harumphy (talk) 21:14, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article says "The bunker is open to the public most of the year. It has a substantial collection of military and Cold War memorabilia, including one of the largest collections of decommissioned nuclear weapons in the world." It would be good if a list of all the weapons on display could be provided.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.176.105.135 (talk) 10:25, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of display weapons needed
Talk:Baska, Andal

message: The coordinates used here are those of Andal. Please replace them with the actual ones. -- P.K.Niyogi 13:26, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Changed to coordinates of Durgapur - P.K.Niyogi 12:43, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Coordinates
Talk:Dupath Well

message: Why was this text removed ? - please discuss before removing further text.
In 1999 there was some controversy regarding this site and others under the care of the
English Heritage organisation. The Cornish Stannary Parliament wrote to English Heritage asking them to remove all signs bearing their name from Cornish sites by July 1999 as they regard the ancient sites as Cornish heritage, not English. Over eleven months eighteen signs were removed by members of the Cornish Stannary and a letter was sent to English Heritage saying "The signs have been confiscated and held as evidence of English cultural aggression in Cornwall. Such racially motivated signs are deeply offensive and cause distress to many Cornish people". (see external BBC link). * Cornish Stannary Parliament tackles cultural aggression in Cornwall  *BBC news - Historic signs case trio bound over
The bias of this paragraph is currently being discussed at Talk:Tintagel Castle Putney Bridge 23:22, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversy over the site

message: The tale under History is taken word for word from the English Heritage site.  An alternative version is given on the Cornish Heritage site (which is slightly more informative altogether). --Martin Wyatt (talk) 16:04, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: The tale
Talk:Halliggye Fogou

message: Why was this text removed ? - please discuss before removing further text.
In 1999 there was some controversy regarding this site and others under the care of the
English Heritage organisation. The Cornish Stannary Parliament wrote to English Heritage asking them to remove all signs bearing their name from Cornish sites by July 1999 as they regard the ancient sites as Cornish heritage, not English. Over eleven months eighteen signs were removed by members of the Cornish Stannary and a letter was sent to English Heritage saying "The signs have been confiscated and held as evidence of English cultural aggression in Cornwall. Such racially motivated signs are deeply offensive and cause distress to many Cornish people". (see external BBC link). * Cornish Stannary Parliament tackles cultural aggression in Cornwall  *BBC news - Historic signs case trio bound over
The bias of this paragraph is currently being discussed at Talk:Tintagel Castle Putney Bridge 23:22, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversy over the site
Talk:KM2000

message: is the standard knife of the Bundeswehr, mostly used by the German Army.
In fact, Bundeswehr IS the name of the german army.
:Not exactly. Bundeswehr is the name of the German military as a whole, including the army (or Heer), air force and navy (among others). κаллэмакс 22:32, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: At least a short time ago, it was not usually given at least to normal troops (though a multi-use pocket knife is), but soldiers can and do purchase them and use them.--2001:A61:260D:6E01:E004:F71:751:2DFC (talk) 10:32, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Talk:The Hurlers (stone circles)

message: Why was this text removed ? - please discuss before removing further text.
In 1999 there was some controversy regarding this site and others under the care of the
English Heritage organisation. The Cornish Stannary Parliament wrote to English Heritage asking them to remove all signs bearing their name from Cornish sites by July 1999 as they regard the ancient sites as Cornish heritage, not English. Over eleven months eighteen signs were removed by members of the Cornish Stannary and a letter was sent to English Heritage saying "The signs have been confiscated and held as evidence of English cultural aggression in Cornwall. Such racially motivated signs are deeply offensive and cause distress to many Cornish people". (see external BBC link). * Cornish Stannary Parliament tackles cultural aggression in Cornwall  *BBC news - Historic signs case trio bound over
The bias of this paragraph is currently being discussed at Talk:Tintagel Castle Putney Bridge 23:20, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversy over the site

message: The map seems to show a stone near the centre of the middle circle, but this is not mentioned in the text. Martinevans123 (talk) 10:35, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Centre stone in middle circle?
Talk:King Doniert's Stone

message: Why was this text removed ? - please discuss before removing further text.
In 1999 there was some controversy regarding this site and others under the care of the
English Heritage organisation. The Cornish Stannary Parliament wrote to English Heritage asking them to remove all signs bearing their name from Cornish sites by July 1999 as they regard the ancient sites as Cornish heritage, not English. Over eleven months eighteen signs were removed by members of the Cornish Stannary and a letter was sent to English Heritage saying "The signs have been confiscated and held as evidence of English cultural aggression in Cornwall. Such racially motivated signs are deeply offensive and cause distress to many Cornish people". (see external BBC link). * Cornish Stannary Parliament tackles cultural aggression in Cornwall  *BBC news - Historic signs case trio bound over
The bias of this paragraph is currently being discussed at Talk:Tintagel Castle Putney Bridge 23:22, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversy over the site
Talk:Novus homo

message: The search for "New Man" redirects here, and it is a term equally employed by many Marxist critics to designate a "man" whose psycho-affective character has radically changed since the fall of capitalism. Someone should create a disambiguation page...I'm not really sure how Emancipated (talk) 09:52, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation 

message: Wouldn't a new man, in a non condescending tone be novus vir, not novus homo?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.126.148.250 (talk) 18:05, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Homo is also used to refer to a "man" in the meaning of a "human being". Although the title of novus homo was only given to males. --BiT (talk) 12:05, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Novus Vir?

message: The article should probably mention the concept of the New Man in modern ideologies such as Communism, Fascism and Nazism. One of their major goals was to create a new kind of citizen according to their belief that mankind was infinitely perfectible. ADM (talk) 00:04, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Modern ideologies

message: " When a man entered public life on an unprecedented scale for a high communal office"  what does that mean?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.8.98.142 (talk) 19:04, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unprecedented scale? 

message: Grammatically speaking, only "Homo novus" is correct. See: homo erectus, homo universalis, civis Romanus etc. "Novus homo" is just a bad calque of English "new man", which is not what this is about. Google shows 72.600 results for "Novus homo" -Wikipedia and 210.000 for "Homo novus". Prinsgezinde (talk) 08:57, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know what you mean by "grammatically speaking", but from searching through the PHI corpus of Roman writings, I got the impression that "novus homo" (in various cases and numbers) is actually the more common word order overall, even. That is, with the Romans. Draco argenteus (talk) 22:07, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Move?
Talk:Penhallam

message: Why was this text removed ? - please discuss before removing further text.
In 1999 there was some controversy regarding this site and others under the care of the
English Heritage organisation. The Cornish Stannary Parliament wrote to English Heritage asking them to remove all signs bearing their name from Cornish sites by July 1999 as they regard the ancient sites as Cornish heritage, not English. Over eleven months eighteen signs were removed by members of the Cornish Stannary and a letter was sent to English Heritage saying "The signs have been confiscated and held as evidence of English cultural aggression in Cornwall. Such racially motivated signs are deeply offensive and cause distress to many Cornish people". (see external BBC link). * Cornish Stannary Parliament tackles cultural aggression in Cornwall  *BBC news - Historic signs case trio bound over
The bias of this paragraph is currently being discussed at Talk:Tintagel Castle Putney Bridge 23:21, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversy over the site
Talk:St Breock Downs Monolith

message: Why was this text removed ? - please discuss before removing further text.
In 1999 there was some controversy regarding this site and others under the care of the
English Heritage organisation. The Cornish Stannary Parliament wrote to English Heritage asking them to remove all signs bearing their name from Cornish sites by July 1999 as they regard the ancient sites as Cornish heritage, not English. Over eleven months eighteen signs were removed by members of the Cornish Stannary and a letter was sent to English Heritage saying "The signs have been confiscated and held as evidence of English cultural aggression in Cornwall. Such racially motivated signs are deeply offensive and cause distress to many Cornish people". (see external BBC link). * Cornish Stannary Parliament tackles cultural aggression in Cornwall  *BBC news - Historic signs case trio bound over
The bias of this paragraph is currently being discussed at Talk:Tintagel Castle Putney Bridge 23:21, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversy over the site
Talk:St Catherine's Castle

message: Why was this text removed ? - please discuss before removing further text.
In 1999 there was some controversy regarding this site and others under the care of the
English Heritage organisation. The Cornish Stannary Parliament wrote to English Heritage asking them to remove all signs bearing their name from Cornish sites by July 1999 as they regard the ancient sites as Cornish heritage, not English. Over eleven months eighteen signs were removed by members of the Cornish Stannary and a letter was sent to English Heritage saying "The signs have been confiscated and held as evidence of English cultural aggression in Cornwall. Such racially motivated signs are deeply offensive and cause distress to many Cornish people". (see external BBC link). * Cornish Stannary Parliament tackles cultural aggression in Cornwall  *BBC news - Historic signs case trio bound over
The bias of this paragraph is currently being discussed at Talk:Tintagel Castle Putney Bridge 23:20, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversy over the site