Talk:Floor plan

message: I've played around with the size and posistioning of the images as best I can, but I still think that its less than ideal. My proposed solution to this is to split the two stubs, one for the archeticural term and one for the electronics term, but I would like input into the new locations. The options are presented in decresing order of preference for me (ie. my first choice is 1, my 2nd choice is 2 and my third choice is 3). Thryduulf 21:52, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: split into two stubs

message: There's not enough detail here at the moment to warrant splitting up. So contrary to the above, I propose merging this article into the more general Plan view. - Sticki 22:05, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: I started with this article after plan view had been merged with floor plan, and after a great deal of stuff had been added regarding house plans. Because plan view is geometry related and is applicable to more disciplines than floor plans, I have split it out again and expanded it. It is still a stub, but is a good companion to elevation (view) and cross section (geometry). The lists related to house plans were so specific to that discipline, they needed to be removed from floor plan, which I have done. Perhaps there it can successfully become a larger article related to House design without bogging down floor plan. What floor plan could use is some history. Otherwise perhaps it just gets merged into Plans (drawings).--Jrsnarn 15:35, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Split

message: I'm curious as to why clarification is needed (on the first floorplan example) to state that it is a U.S. floorplan.  If it _is_ needed, I'm curious why the second isn't also listed as a U.S. floorplan example.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 157.201.198.48 (talk) 16:21, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  US Floor Plan 

message: I'm wondering why there is a redirect from "Line (building)" when the term line is not mentioned in the article. How is the term used, what relation does it have to the article? Rexparry sydney 03:24, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  How does the term 'line' fit into this? 

message: The plans that we have right now are fairly simple, which is fine, but for balance I think we also need a graphic of a professional (i.e. construction grade) floor plan.  If I have the time, I may offer one of my own (of an existing building of course; I don't really want to release any of my personal designs into the public domain).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fox69 (talk • contribs) 00:45, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  More "Complex" Floor Plan 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Floor plan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100607213549/http://www.sanjoseca.gov/planning/counter/planning_sanjose/Planning_in_San_Jose_pt3.pdf to http://www.sanjoseca.gov/planning/counter/planning_sanjose/Planning_in_San_Jose_pt3.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:36, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Ichnography is an archaic term for a floor plan. It should be merged into this article. --Macrakis (talk) 05:21, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 15:58, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from ichnography