lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Potato cannon

message: I noticed that http://stats.grok.se/en/latest/Potato_cannon is about three times more popular than http://stats.grok.se/en/latest/Spud_gun so I believe this move would be uncontroversial per WP:UCN. But then again, I just checked Google, and there were about 1/4 more hits on spud gun. What do other people think? Npmay (talk) 10:03, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Leave as spud gun per WP:COMMONNAME. The comparison in books makes it clear.⋙–Berean–Hunter—► 13:43, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Withdrawn. No further questions. Don't shoot! Npmay (talk) 22:26, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to [[Potato cannon]]? No. 

message: As a kid in the 80s, we used to have very simple spud guns that fired pieces of potato using the force of rubber bands or simple spring triggers. These don't seem to be covered in the article at all and are specifically ruled out by the definition given in the lead. --Dweller (talk) 14:56, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: That's at Spud gun (toy) as per the link at the top of the page. Nick Cooper (talk) 15:18, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  British spud guns 

message: The four references given at the top of this article all have titles referring to "Potato cannon", or "cannon". None of them refer to "spud gun". --Dweller (talk) 14:27, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: No objection, so I'll rename. --Dweller (talk) 09:59, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested rename to [[Potato cannon]] 

message: Can someone with access to the cited source () double-check whether this edit accurately represents it?  --JBL (talk) 02:15, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Double-check an edit?
Talk:Gabriel Gorodetsky

message: It confronts neutrality.
"In the Last Republic Suvorov responded to Gorodetsky and other critics of his first two books on Second World War history. He was particularly scathing in his criticisms of Gorodetsky's work, especially The Icebreaker Myth."
Nothing is said neither about Gorodetsky's answers nor about points of view of other famous historians.
: These are the FACTS - Suvorov indeed said that. I think we have neutral text here without saying who is right and who is wrong. If you feel that article is not finished add stub tag. Other famous historians are unrelated to this article. This article is not biased.  Sigitas 06:56, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is definitely Suvorov-sided. 
Talk:Bruce Logan (author)

message: This article is so loaded.  How sad.  Suppose I will have to pay it some attention sometime soon.A.J.Chesswas 04:43, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Loaded
Talk:Is There Anybody Out There?

message: Is there any other concensus (apart from me), that suggests the guitar part was heavily influenced by the James Bond Theme? Or vice versa?
:no. they sound similar, but that's hardly encyclopedia worthy. --Progjunky 12:04, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't even agree that they sound similar, apart from the fact that they both feature a tone which rises chromatically twice and then descends to its starting point.  If that's all it takes for you to think you're hearing the same song, your brain is crude, almost reptilian in its simplicity.  I don't even know how you function, how you remember where to void your bladder and bowels on a daily basis.  Honestly.  These songs sound nothing alike.  --63.25.21.154 (talk) 13:44, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Although completely out of order, this was pretty fucking specialist! Pissed myself laughing LOL Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 16:51, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: James Bond?
Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Hurricane Devon

message: I'd like to comment Hurricane Devon apparently has had problems with copyrights even before he registered as Hurricane Devon. He has been notified about copyright infringements several times (I've personally told him about copyrights three times plus tagged many of his uploads with the  tag), so he should have been well aware of what he has been doing. He has still continued to add copyrighted material. Recently he started to tag his images with public domain tags, even when they clearly aren't in public domain. I told him about that, but he did not react.--Jyril 11:24, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright infringements by Hurricane Devon

message: I've agreed to unblock Hurricane Devon now, as he as agreed to an extended period of copyvio probation, and he's agreed to help clean up the mess he caused.  I'm delisting this RFC because it's been inactive for a long time.  See Talk:Hurricane Devon for the probation agreement, which lasts until January, 2007.  Mangojuicetalk 16:03, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Probation
Talk:Gauhar Jaan

message: The entire article is littered with NPOV. There's no point picking individual lines. It needs complete rewrite. --soUmyaSch 11:28, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV
Talk:Bertie Johnston

message: I don't understand the following statement: "Johnston won his seat as a National Party of Australia candidate in the election of June 1917".  
The National's predecessor, the Country Party, did not exist until after 1917 and as far as I am aware, there was no party called the "National Party of Australia" at this time.  --Roisterer 11:44, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  National Party of Australia?
Talk:Avraamy Aslanbegov

message: No sources was provided for his Azeri origin. So I removed the claim. Lida Vorig (talk) 02:00, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Neftchi would you provide a scan or a screenshot from the the source you added. And btw, I'm not armenian, I don't know what the armenian articles had to do with this one? Lida Vorig (talk) 03:32, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It doesnt matter of what ethnic group you are, you just cannot edits articles as you do without any discussion to reach concensus. Note that you are under editing restrictions under Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2. Also this kind of random edits by you could trigger a new edit war between Armenian and Azerbaijani Wikipedians. Neftchi (talk) 10:00, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Why would Armenian and Azerbaijani Wikipedians want to fight with one another if someone is trying to make their articles better? Please don't change the subject, you provided the source, now provide a scan or a screenshot so we all can see and improve this article.  Lida Vorig (talk) 20:23, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Traffic Bridge

message: Since this bridge is officially closed (at least for the time being), I wonder if the infobox should include a closing date as well? 23skidoo 11:51, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This article definitely needs to be renamed "Traffic Bridge (Saskatoon)".  I would do it myself, but there's already an existing page with a redirect on it.  I'm not sure how to remove it so this article can be moved. Drm310 16:20, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Closing date?

message: The article states that the pedestrian walkway was added "a few years after [the bridge] opened", yet it's clearly visible on the left in the "1907" picture of the bridge.  Either the photo is misdated or the article is incorrect; anybody know which?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr Death (talk • contribs) 08:18, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pedestrian walkway 

message: Someone has posted a Split proposal - but didn't start a discussion thread - suggesting separate articles be created for the original Traffic Bridge and its replacement. I oppose the split; the bridge name (for now) is not changing, and the replacement bridge is physically identical to the original except for its width and some other bits and pieces. If the new bridge had a different name or was physically distinct from the original, I could see it. Otherwise, it doesn't make sense to split the articles. 136.159.160.8 (talk) 21:29, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split proposal 

message: Although the article cites a media report fearing about traffic impacts in leaving the bridge closed, anecdotally, it appears the traffic Armageddon that was feared did not occur - at least not when the other 3 downtown bridges (Buckwold, Broadway, University) were all open and not closed for maintenance or other issues. As I say, this is anecdotal, so a source would be needed. Was there a followup news report about traffic impacts? The crossing as unavailable for 8 years and the impression I got was, after an initial period of adjustment, people made do. It might be worth seeing if there was any media coverage regarding the impact of the closure on the businesses along Victoria Avenue (there are a few) that were impacted by the loss of traffic to and from the bridge, and perhaps access to Nutana Collegiate. Just thoughts. 23skidoo (talk) 17:53, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Traffic impact on 2010 closure
Talk:Safe, sane and consensual

message: How historically valid is this D. Stein indication???--84.152.212.133 11:57, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: New section

message: The links in this are dead...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.187.75.183 (talk) 00:24, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links are dead 

message: Personally I don't consider this inaccurate, it's just...
Other people in the BDSM community do not consider SSC to be an accurate term for these relationships or activities. The term Risk Aware Consensual Kink (RACK) is sometimes used as a substitute description. Disagreements generally arise from the subjective nature of each term in SSC when using the term as a yardstick to evaluate activities. It can be argued that the terms in RACK are equally subjective. "How safe is safe enough?" is a legitimate question, as is "How aware is aware enough?".
...it kinda reads "Some people disagree.  <a "See also" link>.  Disagreements usually arise when this is disagreed upon.  It can be argued that <aforementioned link> could also be disagreed with.  Here's a valid interrogative statement.
Eh, ma*aaaa*ybe not in an encyclopedia?  Still leaving it here if someone sees something and could rewrite it to be less... fluff xerxesbeat (talk) 17:07, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fluff removed 

message: I've split this out from the BDSM article, as I think there's substantially more to be said about this. 
Supporting sources:
* 
* 
* 
* more to come
-- The Anome (talk) 17:11, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split out 

message: Any Relation between individuals and especially Kink Sex must Continually be Safe, Sane, Informed, and Consensual. And its the responsibility off everyone involved to assure it stays that way for everybody involved!!!
And in situations where this is not possible but an interaction is mandated non the less (like with care for the mentally less equipped), the relationship needs at least to be monitored and evaluated periodically, all according to the risks involved.163.158.1.136 (talk) 12:12, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  It’s actually really simple
Talk:Ramesh Powar

message: dear sir  ilike rameash powar want meet him my id is sngtmhatre@yahoo.com please contact
:You should be able to reach him by post using the address 'Ramesh Powar, C/o Mumbai Cricket Association, Wankhede Stadium, Churchgate, Mumbai'. Tintin (talk) 04:17, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: ...because it was almost word-for-word copied from Powar's Cricinfo page. That is not allowed on Wikipedia, so please don't do it! Loganberry (Talk) 02:27, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bio removed... 

message: Ramesh Powar is obese and is not fit to play cricket . This is unverifiable content.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.162.23.4 (talk) 15:07, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please remove these lines 
Talk:Network traffic measurement

message: I have a feeling that the tools section violates WP:NOT on the grounds of advertising and being a repository of links:
Examples:
Foo: does this and that. Price: $1 million
Bar: does something different.  Price: 1 cent
This section may have to be rewritten to conform to WP:NOT.
--Geopgeop 12:15, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed that section. Almost all of the items were red links and were written as little more then SPAMs. It looked like an impossible to keep updated list of softs that added little to the articel. 68.39.174.238 18:16, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

text: The software list is not good.  WP is not a linklist/web directory.  I've removed the list and copyedited the article so it can exist without the list. -- Moondyne 01:59, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

text: I removed them because it was unencyclopaedic information.  The article should explain what Network Traffic Measurement is, not be a directory of NTM tools.  Please read WP:EL.  Thanks for pointing out another article with similar problems - I'll have a look at that shortly. -- Moondyne 12:58, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

text: Because we are writing an encyclopaedia with content.  We are not a directory.  Try Google. -- Moondyne 13:12, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

text: Chris, in hindsight I may have been overly zealous in removing the whole See also section.  What I was trying to do was to remove a directory of external links which the vast majority of entries were.  This is outside Wikipedia guidelines.  I'd support reinstating the entries which had WP articles written, such as MRTG and PRTG, which makes the entry verifiable and notable.  Those entries should not have external links on this page though, as they belong in the respective articles, not here.  And I reiterate, packages with no WP article should not be there. — Moondyne 10:57, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.  What the article needs is 1 or 2 quality external links that explain what NTM is to go into the External links section. — Moondyne 11:11, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Fearless (Pink Floyd song)

message: What the...? Released as a single, but NOT released as a single? Which is it? BotleySmith 12:25, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm pretty sure they meant it wasn't released as a single in the UK. That's where they seem to define the singles releases for the Floyd. RttlesnkeWhiskey 07:58, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Perhaps. It doesn't really sound like his lyrics. This isn't necessarily the case, however — maybe Gilmour wrote the bridge music. BotleySmith 16:27, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: WTF?

message: Is pretty broken on this page. 80.41.238.191 17:04, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info box 

message: I'm not at all convinced that Waters played the rhythm guitar on this.  I think the author's reference to "The Amazing Pudding" is wrong as further down the page he has attributed a quote from Gilmour where he is clearly talking about "Dogs", to "Corporal Clegg".  Similarly, I think the quote attributed to Waters regarding this open tuning is actually Waters referring to "Free Four".  Just because Waters learned the tuning from Barrett doesn't mean that Gilmour wouldn't have known it too.  I have the complete set of "The Amazing Pudding" so I'll check it.NH78.147.100.19 (talk) 23:15, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Waters playing rhythm guitar? 

message: Is there any source for the assertion that this song contains a field recording (of "You'll Never Walk Alone")?  It sounds to me like it's not a field recording at all, but a studio re-creation of one.  Listen with headphones and you'll see, er hear what I mean.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ernie.bornheimer (talk • contribs) 04:27, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Field recording? I don't think so
Talk:Negotino

message: Hey, is the name derived from the Romanian "negot" (meaning trade) and the Greek ending "-ino" used to make place names? Or does it have a local etymology? - FrancisTyers 12:29, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Etymology of name

message: DINGLE 91.132.175.131 (talk) 21:53, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quandale Dingle
Talk:Bloody Roar: Primal Fury

message: This article should be merged with Bloody Roar 3. This is just a GameCube port with a different name. --Mika1h (talk) 14:39, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Disney's Magical Mirror Starring Mickey Mouse

message: "Magical Mirror was featured as an entire cartoon on The Many Adventures of Mickey Mouse, which was released on DVD on December 31, 2007."
i cleaned up that blurb that was at the bottom of the article based on what I found, but even that information looked odd, probably due to language issues (it seemed to have been translated from another language), so i moved it here to the Talk page. here's the info on disney.wikia.com...  i couldn't even find this DVD for sale on Amazon or eBay. if someone out there actually owns this DVD and can use maybe the information on its sleeve/back cover as a source, it would go a long way to getting this article cited properly. :)  -- Khisanth (talk) 02:01, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  request for info from anyone who owns ''The Many Adventures of Mickey Mouse'' 
Talk:Pennypack Creek

message: So, if Pennypacker Creek got its name from the Lenape tribe---which does sound logical---was it a coincidence and Samuel Pennypacker established his estate near there? 2601:80:4105:25A0:7D7E:B67E:63D9:AC33 (talk) 17:01, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source of the name.
Talk:Donkey Konga 2

message: There's no mention of the variation between the Japanese "Donkey Konga 2: Hit Song Parade" and the US one.  I've been looking for information, but other than the drastic differences, I know nothing.--AlphaTwo 03:21, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Donkey Konga 2: Hit Song Parade

message: This article is a stub.  Can we add more such as the many modes and options throughout the game and a reception section? Diddy kong country23 (talk) 15:01, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  improvement
Talk:Super Monkey Ball 2

message: This article used to have a section on gltiches and the like in the game, but it's since been removed. How come? Should it be put back in? The Pondermatic (talk) 03:50, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Game Glitches

message: It seems like there should be screenshots of each world in the list of worlds. The Pondermatic (talk) 03:44, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Screenshots

message: What should be done about the lack of citations for the article? It seems like a really tough article to find sources for since it's about a video game, but I really don't have much experience editing so I wouldn't know. xP The Pondermatic (talk) 03:44, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations
Talk:Super Robot Wars GC

message: Considering that it was ported to the 360 as SRW XO, is it really accurate to call GC a gamecube-exclusive game? Kouban 20:11, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Exclusive? 

message: Anyone know the release date of the Xbox 360 port? SharkD (talk) 22:34, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Xbox 360 release
Talk:WWF WrestleMania X8 (video game)

message: The title of the article uses WWE, the article itself uses WWF when talking about this game (though uses WWE for some other uses), the pre-release (note the Rating Pending rating) boxart used in the sidebar here shows World Wrestling Federation written out, the actual box art uses the WWE logo http://www.gamefaqs.com/console/gamecube/image/475159.html?box=52723 and the screens in the game itself use the WWF logo http://www.gamefaqs.com/console/gamecube/image/475159.html?gs=26  
Shouldn't there at least be something in the article about this whole mess over which title to use, how it's the first game to have WWE on the package, last game to use WWF in game, etc etc etc. At the very least, references to the game's title within the article should reflect the same usage as in the article title (both WWE or both WWF), for consistancy, right?76.226.103.166 (talk) 07:48, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Right! The game itself is the subject here, and it's branded WWF. You could put the disc in a box labeled anything, shake it up, take it out, pop it in and your GameCube will still attempt to simulate the World Wrestling Federation. It's not wrong. It just has no way of reading its own box's label, seeing the future or knowing it's all just a game. InedibleHulk (talk) 10:37, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  WWF vs WWE 
Talk:WWE WrestleMania XIX (video game)

message: Can you edit/change the existing roster's move set or outfits?
: Moves and there is an alternate outfit for each  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bam123456789 (talk • contribs) 17:37, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Making changes?
Talk:Naruto: Clash of Ninja 2

message: Naruto: Clash of Ninja 2 (video game) → Naruto: Clash of Ninja 2 – {No need for the video game part since there is nothing else with that name}
===Survey===
:Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~ 
===Discussion===
:Add any additional comments
Is there a reason we needed a vote? Voting is evil. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 06:06, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: :Add any additional comments
Is there a reason we needed a vote? Voting is evil. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 06:06, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: Do you think we should add an extra section explaining what features this game has from the first one and how it is the same? I think it would be pretty important for people to know the differences if they think about buying the game. Just asking, if you guys say yes than I'm more than happy to add in the new features from the game and if not then never mind. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sasori X (talk • contribs) 04:36, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Differences from the first game