Talk:Grammy Award for Best New Artist

message: The current format matches all the (many) other Grammy pages, and also complies with the Manual of Style guideline that year links should not be misleading. 1972 should lead to the article on 1972, not ever to "Grammy Awards of 1972"-- sannse (talk) 23:15, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That curse is a load of crap! Toni braxton, Sheryl Crow, CHRISTINA AGUILERA, norah Jones, LeAnn Rhymes, ALICIA KEYS, Maroon 5, Carrie Underwood, The Beatles
Not to mention that Evanescence were not affected by "the curse" at all. Their second album, the Open Door debuted at #1 in six countries and has sold 5 million copies worldwide. While that is only a third of the album sales Fallen has achieved, it is still pretty good considering how record sales are these days. And as for the personal drama that surrounds the band, please, they are hardly the first band this has happened to. Guns N Roses has had numerous lineup changes, the lead singer's had two failed relationships amid allegations of domestic abuse, he is no stranger to lawsuits at all, and Chinese Democracy is probably the most delayed album in the history of music. GNR have yet to win a single Grammy, much less in a certain category that could cause people to say that they are cursed. So that "curse" thing is total bull.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.189.90.68 (talk) 07:02, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

text: No, sweetheart. The eligibility year is (or is supposed to be, but they always break their own rules) from October 1 to September 30 of the next year. So the Grammies presented in 2008 were for recordings from October 2006 through September 2007. And Back to Black was in fact released in October 2006.--Maaladeisia (talk) 03:23, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Okay,I know Lady Gaga didn't get this award but there are a lot of articles about the award rule that had to be change after she doesn't qualified for the year after she entered the industry. I think it's pretty important to put a little article about that as it's like a phenomenon how an artist can affect on Grammy rule. I know you maybe said that "It's only Lady Gaga..who cares" but to me, for an award like this to change its eligibility because of an artist, I think it's pretty important to include a small article about it in this section. This also reported by a lots of reliable source so I'm not joking or lying.
http://www.google.com.my/search?sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=lady+gaga+best+new+artist+grammy+rule+change  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Syukri Abd Rahman (talk • contribs) 04:49, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Lady Gaga

message: I don't see how there can be much of a curse associated with an award for best new artist won by the Beatles and Mariah Carey, two of the most successful recordings artists in history. Several others have also had pretty sustained success - perhaps some of the others.  Perhaps the fact that many of these bands were not successful might be due to the fact that they were terrible one or two hit wonders.  The "curse" merely demonstrates that the academy isn't very good at figuring out what groups are actually likely to have sustained success when they give out these awards.  Starland Vocal Band was a literal one hit wonder - they had no other singles reach the top 40 and their album only reached #20.  The fact that they won the award (after their follow up singles had already bombed!) and then had no further success shows that the Academy has awful judgment, not that it cursed them.  I think that, at the very least, the existence of very successful artists who've won the award (like the Beatles and Carey) ought to be highlighted in this article's currently uncritical discussion of the "curse". john k (talk) 22:34, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Curse? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Grammy Award for Best New Artist. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20050217043236/http://www.boston.com:80/news/globe/living/articles/2005/02/11/who_gets_a_grammy/ to http://www.boston.com/news/globe/living/articles/2005/02/11/who_gets_a_grammy/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:44, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Grammy Award for Best New Artist. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120201120225/http://www.grammy.com/nominees to http://www.grammy.com/nominees
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:04, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Grammy Award for Best New Artist. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140125200724/http://blog.washingtonpost.com/clicktrack/2010/01/the_grammys_the_curse_of_the_b.html to http://blog.washingtonpost.com/clicktrack/2010/01/the_grammys_the_curse_of_the_b.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:14, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Grammy Award for Best New Artist. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120709080822/http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2009%5C12%5C04%5Cstory_4-12-2009_pg9_1 to http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2009%5C12%5C04%5Cstory_4-12-2009_pg9_1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:58, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:52, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:22, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion