Talk:Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad

message: Was the Burlington and Missouri River Rail Road the same as the Burlington and Missouri Railroad Company referred to here? • Freechild'sup? 17:04, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Burlington and Missouri Railroad Company

message: The image :Image:Pioneer Zephyr Dawn to Dusk Club.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here.  In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.  Please check
:* That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
:* That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --09:27, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image copyright problem with Image:Pioneer Zephyr Dawn to Dusk Club.jpg

message: There is some confusion in paragraph 2 of "History 1848 to 1882" that states "The line from Aurora to Chicago was built through the fledgling towns of Naperville,..."  This is a different line from the AB.  The AB was using Galena & Chicago Union Railroad tracks and equipment until 1864 when it built its own tracks into Chicago.  In 1868 the AB built SW down to Burlington IA and on down to Quincy IL.  It was then that it changed its name to CB&Q. "Burlington Route Historical Society"   Dangnad (talk) 02:13, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Line Confusion 

message: Er...where is ye list of the road's presidents?--Jim Luedke  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimlue (talk • contribs) 22:58, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Officers

message: We need a list of locos that the Chicago, Burlington, and Quincy railroad had. Jonathan is me (talk) 01:48, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Locomotives 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: . Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Mackensen (talk) 14:48, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040214170011/http://www.msichicago.org:80/exhibit/zephyr/index.html to http://www.msichicago.org/exhibit/zephyr/index.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:23, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I check pages listed in :Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of :Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "ICC":
From Alabama Great Southern Railroad: Interstate Commerce Commission, 37 Val. Rep. 1 (1931): Valuation Docket No. 974, The Alabama Great Southern Railroad Company et al.
From Utah Division (D&RGW): Interstate Commerce Commission, 26 Val. Rep. 733 (1929), p. 805: Denver and Rio Grande Railroad Company
From Cincinnati Northern Railroad (1894–1938): Interstate Commerce Commission, 28 Val. Rep. 607: Valuation Docket No. 919, The Cincinnati Northern Railroad Company (1929)
From Chicago and Aurora Railroad: 
From New Orleans and Northeastern Railroad: Interstate Commerce Commission, 37 Val. Rep. 1 (1931): Valuation Docket No. 973, New Orleans and Northeastern Railroad Company
From Glenrock train wreck: ICC Report
From Chicago Junction Railway: 
From Hocking Valley Railway: Interstate Commerce Commission, 29 Val. Rep. 321 (1929), Valuation Docket No. 904: Hocking Valley Railway Company et al.
From Cincinnati, Lebanon and Northern Railway: Interstate Commerce Commission, 22 Val. Rep. 1: Valuation Docket No. 425, The Cincinnati, Lebanon & Northern Railway Company  (1929)
From Chicago and Southern Railroad: 
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:59, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphaned references in [[:Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad]]