lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Spendthrift trust

message: The beneficiary does not need to be in debt. See Nolo definition. --Emurray 01:47, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

message: I am told that many such trusts are created to avoid the grasp of the beneficiaries creditors; however I believe that such protection is not absolute. For example, if you owe a government entity monies such as  income tax (Federal Gov't) or child support ( State/County) or Employment taxes, you are not shielded.
Is this correct ??
--72.197.46.115 (talk) 20:20, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Third Party Trusts: I>E> Spendthrift Trust, sprinkle trust, etc
Talk:Watts truce

message: Kendrick Lamar Duckworth has mentioned the truce in his song M.a.A.d City: "You killed my cousin back in '94, fuck your truce!" 2A0D:6FC0:712:B00:CC5F:EEA4:5BE2:9505 (talk) 07:17, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kendrick Lamar refrence
Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Young Zaphod

message: Sorry about not adding many diffs myself, I have work and classes and all that.  I might add some info on Thursday or Friday night though, presumably that won't be too late or anything (I noticed how long ago some of the other RfC's were started), so I'll probably get some significant contributions added before it gets closed or archived or whatever happens with 'em.  --Atari2600tim (talk • contribs) 07:46, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Public Chamber

message: The Public chamber is still new and what it will actually do seems to be in question.  they could have an effect on the new NGO bill that was passed.
links can be found on Johnson's Russia List Here is a seach done on JRL
--Jowe 01:51, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: They meet in moscow.  I am unsure if they have a permanant location/seat, or even what their meeting schedule is - if they have one.  Official Website (in Russian)  at some point when i have more free time i intend to pull for it.  anyone else feel free to read/babel it and update themselves --Jowe 23:56, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Healesville

message: I just changed the incorrect federal division, which changed from McEwen to Casey after the 2013 federal election, and under Sport, put the recently refounded soccer club. - NexxusDrako (talk) 17:07, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

message: I have just given this article a big overhaul in response to the (well justified) template note at the top, adding a lot of sources, and removing heaps of hype. I know it's better, but am now too close to the content to objectively judge the results of my efforts. I would some other editors to now have a look and clean it up some more as needed. HiLo48 (talk) 09:04, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overhaul. More eyes needed please.
Talk:Kallista, Victoria

message: Much of this article is pasted from http://www.theage.com.au/news/Victoria/Kallista/2005/02/17/1108500206567.html Orderinchaos78 03:39, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It has been removed. 68.39.174.238 21:42, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

text: Thanks for bringing this up! I've just gone back and read your contributions and your summary is correct - I think the way we should do this is restore your changes to the main article and any edits to those, which will look messy at first but we can sort out how the article should read after this is done (as the old saying goes better to have something to work with than nothing.) (Update 16:41 EST - now done.) Orderinchaos78 05:33, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright
Talk:Robert Boyce

message: If anybody is wondering where I heard of this guy, I was reading some of his books, and I was wondering whether I could find other books by him. I checked Wikipedia, and no article existed. So I made one. His books and publications are not rare (if you guys think this is non-notable), since there was stuff by him in my public library. Mipchunk 07:22, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

message: The publications list is very incomplete. If someone can, please fill in the info. I have primarily taken this info from the LSE webpage, but I have also browsed around various publishing websites with books edited/by Boyce. Mipchunk 07:22, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Publications

message: Actually, he was already listed as a red link in the European Civil War article with Paul Preston (also of the LSE). 193.129.65.37 08:20, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  European Civil War
Talk:Lisa Girman

message: Reservists Cleared:
http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2005-08-19-reservistscleared_x.htm
I stand corrected (blush). The annoymous poster should have pasted that link Nobunaga24 22:56, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Check the facts, then get back to me 

message: A "Dishonorable discharge" is one given as a result of a court-martial conviction.  It is part of the punishment for a crime. More importantly, ONLY a court-martial can give a Dishonorable Discharge.  In this case, it looks like two things happened.  One: She received Non-judicial punishment, which is not a criminal conviction.  In her case, the NJP may have been done by a general officer because Girman was a high ranking NCO.  We do not know what sort of punishment was handed out.  The second procedure was probably a Separation Board for misconduct.  It, too, is an administrative proceeding that determines if the service member stays in the service.  Typically these boards are held for drug use, poor performance, convictions in civilian courts.  They do not punish the service member -- only "fire" them.  They can characterize the discharge as "honorable", "general", or "other than honorable".  In this case it looks like a separation board kicked her out of the reserves with an OTH discharge.  It is not the same as a Dishonorable Discharge.  With her rank and time in service, the board decision would have to be approved by the Secretary of the Army.  Again, the news stories do not discuss this as these are technical details of Army administrative law.--S. Rich (talk) 22:15, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discharge clarification
Talk:Don Falcone

message: All Music Guide entry
Piero Scaruffi
entry
*Neither of those links convince me of the notability of Don Falcone: see the music notability guidelines for a list of criteria. Don Falcone does not appear to meet any of them. I have listed Don Falcone for deletion  --JerryOrr 04:12, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Substantiation of Don Falcone article

message: At the moment, this is an unsourced list of accomplishments and albums masquerading as an article about a person.
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mdbrownmsw (talk • contribs).
*Part of the difficulty in discussing Falcone is that he has only recorded one track by his real name . Part of his notability is with Spaceship Eyes, his alias. This is noted in an All Music Guide entry. The All Music entry also notes his work with Thessalonians on Silent Records. Since then, Falcone is synonymous with his Spirits Burning project, which brings together many well-known (and lesser known) musicians. This is noted in his most recent interview, in Aural Innovations #34 (August 2006) .
One resource for info on Falcone's work in the 1990s and some of the 2000s is Piero Scaruffi, author of the History of Rock. He has written about some of Falcone's bands and interviewed him. Falcone's time with Thessalonians is documented at . His time with Melting Euphoria is documented at . His Spaceship Eyes project and the early years of his Spirits Burning project are covered at . Scaruffi also interviewed Falcone . 	 
The most recent release with Falcone was daevid allen and Don Falcone on Voiceprint. Some info on this CD is on the Voiceprint Records website . There is also a link there to a review of the CD, which notes that the CD is actually by Spirits Burning. 	 
 		 
I'm hoping that someone can use the above to resource this article, or suggest how to format it correctly, as described in Wikipedia:Citing sources . The informant 06:08, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Advert and Unreferenced tags
Talk:Huqúqu'lláh

message: Looking through the Writings and texts from various sources, it seems that Huqúqu'lláh is rarely referred to as "the Huqúqu'lláh" - just "Huqúqu'lláh" (unless it's being used as an adjective, i.e. "the Huqúqu'lláh fund", "the Huqúqu'lláh payment", etc.).  The original Arabic doesn't use the definite article either.  Would anyone object to me revising the usage here?  I just want to make sure I don't change something that was done purposefully.  Keldan 02:16, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't write this article, but I think you are right. -- Jeff3000 02:17, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I did write this article, and I have no idea what is the correct usage. I think you're right. Cuñado  - Talk 08:05, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Definite article

message: Would it be appropriate to add the box marker  to the this article since it certainly relates to the Bahá'í Faith? Leif (talk) 19:17, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Baha'i Box?

message: I have tried to include the Timeline of the institution of Huqúqu'lláh as a section inside this article, but I couldn't avoid the sections below it from wrapping around it. Could someone help? Please feel free to improve the timeline as well. Could a separate category 'Bahá'í timelines' be created? Wiki-uk (talk) 18:11, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timeline 

message: under 'Role in succession of authority' I propose to remove the last paragraph as the reference used is of Adib Taherzadeh who is a Mainstream Baha'i Scholar and his POV represents the view of only one sect of Baha'i faith.Asad29591 (talk) 14:48, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: For the last two years I have several times asked you to read WP:WEIGHT and apply it. It appears you have not. You represent a tiny minority of (generously) 100 people compared to at least 5 million Baha'is. You could argue that Taherzadeh is not independent enough from the topic, but he is attributed in-text. If you think the sourcing is not good enough, you're welcome to research and find the subject addressed in Garlington or Warburg or some stronger source. Cuñado ☼ - Talk 15:23, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think  is basically correct here. I removed that paragraph and one more along with the sources they cited. We aren't allowed to waive WP:RS just because we have done in-text attribution, which is for clarifying disagreement among reliable sources. Yes, the material can be added again if we find reliable sources for it. I also don't think WP:WEIGHT has anything to do with weighing the number of adherents of different religious sects, it has to do with weighing the balance of opinion in reliable sources... this is clarified somewhere in WP guidelines and I can find it if needed. Let me know if I'm missing something here. Gazelle55 (talk) 20:54, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original Research
Talk:Heat rub

message: I've created this page since the closest Wikipedia had was Icy Hot, which is a brand name that isn't know to many outside of the US, who probably know it as Deep Heat. Since the Icy Hot article was just a description of the product, I've redirected it here; however, should anyone want to add specific information about the Icy Hot brand then it can certainly be expanded :) rob 02:19, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Creation 

message: removed "This reference link does not work.  The CNN site does not have the article referenced." because it belongs in the discussion page and not the article  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.110.86.189 (talk) 21:07, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  removed
Talk:Mount Dandenong, Victoria

message: The article seems to already have ample photos, but anybody who wants more, I took a picture of the sunset from the lookout, and a picture of one of the television towers from less than 10 metres away. Hope somebody can find a use for them :D See also: commons:Category:Mount Dandenong. Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 09:02, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I'm in Olinda (on the mountain) and we were La Trobe, but it changed recently (something to do with population) to Casey. Electriceel 01:07, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 

message: The coordinates need the following fixes:
* Write here
58.175.137.174 (talk) 07:50, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error 

message: This should be split into two article. The suburb Mt Dandenong is distinct from the mountain Mt. Dandenong 124.104.149.248 (talk) 02:34, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it certainly should be split. A quick look says it shouldn't be too hard. Who's got time? (Not me right now. Maybe later.) HiLo48 (talk) 04:02, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two Articles 

message: Footnote (presently number 5) re Canada climate normals - a link to "Environment Canada—Canadian Climate Normals 1971–2000" seems out of place here.  Unless this is actually relevant, it should be removed.  Any objections?
yoyo (talk) 14:23, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with you. HiLo48 (talk) 22:18, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mistaken footnote 5 re Canada? 
Category talk:American children

message: I intend to revise this category, to only include names of individuals who are notable in their own right. A mere relationship to someone notable is not enough. I will be doing this slowly, as I find time. If you want to point out names for removal, or just remove them yourself, that would be great. Remember that, in order to remove from a category, you actually go to the linked redirect, stub, or article and edit that. --Markzero 15:29, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: notice of revision
Talk:Charlotte Catholic High School

message: The vast majority of information is in no way an advertisement.  If you are talking about the Mission Statement, this is the founding beliefs of the school and necessary to include as this is what the school's self-proclaimed goals/aims are.Hunter 18:21, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Since when does the history have to be notable?  Why then didn't you delete all the sports information when you deleted the dramatic arts informaton?152.2.71.26 22:24, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

text: This page was substantially modified recently by an anonymous editor.  Previously it did not have any of the "advertising" tilt.  I'll work to incorporate some of the new information but keep the page in its previous informational incantation.  ju66l3r 19:36, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy Deletion

message: Knock it off, kids. Drmies (talk) 01:19, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism
Talk:Slonim (Hasidic dynasty)

message: who vandalized the article?Itzik18 02:29, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: To find out, you can always click on the "View history" tab. -- -- -- 00:47, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: When did the break in succession take place? Both the Slonimer Rebbe of B'nei Brak and the Slonimer Rebbe of JLem were Chassidim of the Nesivos Shalom, correct? I ask because one is the son of the Nesivos Shalom, and the other appears to be the einikle of the previous Slonimer dynasty. Was Slonim of Bnei Brak the son-in-law of the Nesivos Shalom or something? --Meshulam 20:57, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The break in succession took place during the lifetime of the Nesivos Shalom; (perhaps during the lifetime of the Birkas Avraham). The Rebbe of  Bnei Brak is the son-in-law of Rabbi Shmu'el Weinberg, son of Rebbe Avraham Weinberg (the Birkas Avraham).  -- -- --  21:53, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  When was the break in succession? 

message: Can anyone tell me why Slonim split?  I heard it had something to do with the Nesivos Shalom giving tish before the Birkas Avraham was nifter, is this true, and why is it worth splitting up over? Yungerman 02:12, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the Hebrew Wikipedia , the Jerusalem sect crowned the Nesivos Shalom as rebbe during the lifetime of the Birkas Avraham.   -- -- --  21:53, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why did Slonim split? 

message: The article would benefit by including historical information about when the community (or individuals) left Slonim and their circumstances during the Holocaust. -- Deborahjay (talk) 13:45, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  When did they leave Slonim?
Talk:John R. Lynch

message: John Lynch definately deserves better than a one-sentence article.--Jersey Devil 02:33, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: To anonymous user--   68.193.208.23 (Talk)
Today you removed the following from the biography of John R. Lynch. Please explain why you did so and the authoritative source for this deletion.  
Lynch attended Kimball Union Academy in New Hampshire, but did not graduate. He was the first African-American Secretary of State in Mississippi.
This is the edit in question:  http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_R._Lynch&diff=56137100&oldid=54652703
31 May 2006 * (diff) (hist) . . John R. Lynch; 14:54 . . 68.193.208.23 (Talk)
This question also appears on the anonymous User Talk page. 
Thank you.
Skywriter 15:27, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Please explain this deletion

message: There are two individuals with the same last name.
James D. Lynch was an African-American who attended Kimball Union Academy and was the first black secretary of state of Mississippi. John Roy Lynch is a separate individual.
I just wanted to correct this on John Roy Lynch page. Ladb2000
Good catch! Skywriter 00:49, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The addition of that information was an error on my part 

message: It's not clear what the editor intended.  I know the Mississippi and SC elections of 1876 were surrounded by violence from Red Shirts, but it's unclear who contested the election and who prevented Lynch from taking the seat in Congress.  Needs more facts, as the sentence is very ambiguous. There were a lot of power struggles going on. --Parkwells (talk) 19:12, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Confusing references to election of 1876
Talk:Upwey, Victoria

message: The article states that a very small part of Upwey is in the City of Knox.  Can anyone show which part?  I propose deleting this reference, but want to be sure before I do. Supt. of Printing (talk) 09:23, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Deleted. Supt. of Printing (talk) 10:04, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Upwey in the City of Knox? 
Talk:Brazil at the 2006 Winter Olympics

message: Has there been anything in the Brazilian media about why Armando dos Santos took performance enhancing drugs? Was it accidental? To improve his performance in a non-bobsleigh sport? Thanks, Andjam 02:49, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why did he take drugs? 
Talk:Elizabeth Jordan Carr

message: Why is she listed in the guinness book of records instead of Louise Brown? Bawolff 02:50, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Brown

message: Since Ms. Carr is not notable other than for the circumstances of her birth, she meets the criteria for WP:BLP1E, which states that people notable for only one event should be incorporated into the history of that event.  Louise Brown has already been moved.  SDY (talk) 21:29, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Louise Brown must have been moved back.  — Rlevse • Talk •  12:04, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: Mason Andrews is said to be her birth doctor but this says Fred Wirth?????  — Rlevse • Talk •  12:04, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Birth doctor

message: I can understand an article on Louise Brown as the first ever.  I also understand that she has a separate article from the IVF article.  Why does Elizabeth Carr have an entry here?  Is the first IVF baby born in ______ country automatically notable? Joe407 (talk) 10:44, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Dwight Duncan

message: It is as just as notable then all the other information in Dwight Duncan's profile. He cannot become the MPP without the riding association.
*The same could be said of any MPP.  It may be "notable" as regards the mechanics of his election victories, but it's not significant for our purposes.  CJCurrie 02:53, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Cinepak

message: The External Links section refers to Compression Technologies Inc at the URL www.cinepak.com, and mentions that it is in Japanese.  The reason the page is in Japanese is that CTI has gone out of business, and the domain name has been snatched up by a squatter.  That page has nothing to do with Cinepak.  Should the link be removed?  It would be nice to retain a mention of CTI.
Cinepak is now in the awkward position of being an orphan.  Supermac was the original owner, then Supermac was bought by Radius.  Before Radius imploded, they sold the rights to CTI.  CTI went out of business circa 2001, so even if there were patent, license, or copyright issues, it is not clear that there is any entity in the world with standing to defend them. Timrprobocom (talk) 23:25, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update 

message: Quote form article: Cinepak files tend to be about 70% larger than similar quality MPEG-4 or Ogg files.
Ogg is container and it is impossible to compare it with Cinepack. Maybe someone was thinking about Theora which is often embedded in Ogg files?
83.26.111.19 (talk) 18:14, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Either way, the claim in the article is overly optimistic. Cinepak is nowhere near H.263 or Theora in terms of quality-per-bitrate. KetchupSalt (talk) 01:30, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comparison of Cinepack and Ogg? 

message: The home page of Cinepak talks about 16-bit and 32-bit versions.  It isn't clarified in this article.  How about 64-bit versions?
—DIV (137.111.13.4 (talk) 03:24, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The 64-bit versions (more precisely, the x86-64 versions) of Windows XP, Vista, 7, 8, and 10 can run 32-bit and 64-bit executables, but not 16-bit executables, see . 32-bit versions of Windows can run 32-bit and 16-bit executables. The 16-bit / 32-bit Cinepak codecs offered on the homepage can only be used by 16-bit / 32-bit executables, respectively. Conquerist (talk) 05:05, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  bits
Talk:GML application schema

message: GML Application schemas are a corollary of GML, but merits an independent topic. 
The redirect was suggested by User:Doug Bell, but then implemented by User:Cdc without transferring the content so the change was de-facto censorship. I have reverted so for now so at least the content is not lost. —dr_shorthair 01:57, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Calling Cdc's creation of the redirect de-facto censorship strikes me as odd and makes me think that you have some sort of vested interest in this topic.  I see no motivation of censorship, simply an effort to improve the encyclopedia. —Doug Bell talk•contrib 15:48, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Doug - yeah I have an interest, though not sure if it is "vested". I'm one of the editors of GML, and am also a developer of application schemas. So I have a strong interest in both pages. But I don't make money out of it;-) Because of my involvement I also have a strong sense of the separation of concerns here, which is why I created the subsidiary page in the first place! The phrase "de-facto censorship" was intended to be descriptive, not perjorative. The content was not transfered, so material was suppressed. Very busy this week, and wanted to link the page to help resolve an issue I am working on so it was frustrating to find the content "gone". I guess that showed. —dr_shorthair 01:12, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Cgml

message: So far, this article is an information-free zone! Only the title of the topic is given. Not a lot of point in posting an article without providing either information or links. Is cGML a GML Application Schema? - or is it something not related to GML? Need more information, references etc. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr Shorthair (talk • contribs) 03:55, 21 February 2006 (UTC)