Talk:2006 Atlantic hurricane season/August

message: Right at the Windwards. Looks nice. -- RattleMan 14:06, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, looks good. No real -70'C cloud tops though, they seem warmer. Chacor 14:10, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think I see convection. íslenska hurikein #12 (samtal) 14:15, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmmm, this one is worth watching. A Hurricane Hunter plane is scheduled to investigate it this afternoon. bob rulz 15:22, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, that's amazing. Shear isn' that high and the NHC seems to be very interested in it. -- WmE 15:25, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Looks great so far. Let's see what recon does in a little bit. Nothing to this in only ~12 hours is pretty good. Hurricanehink (talk) 17:39, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hopefully wind shear may not get in the way. Alastor Moody (talk) 19:08, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Umm, no - "hope" implies you want a TC. TC = bad.--Nilfanion (talk) 19:23, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Lets not start this argument again... Cryomaniac 19:26, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: How many times much we discuss about this, let's not start the fire like what happened to TS Beryl disccuions. Alastor Moody (talk) 20:06, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Yeah, I don't see much coming out of this blob. CrazyC83 21:08, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, I don't expect this ever to be upgraded to a TD. Dry air and wind shear has sure killed many wanna-be storms. Alastor Moody (talk) 07:18, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 92L.INVEST

message: =====63L.NRLTES=====
Weird name. Well here it is in the Gulf of Mexico. Very Organized. íslenska hurikein #12 (samtal) 23:24, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: 63L is a Test Invest - perhaps a precursor to 95L and got on there accidentally? Whatever it is, it does look good. CrazyC83 23:31, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

text: (edit conflict) I have a feeling that header is an NRL tes(t). Whether the entire invest is a test, I have no idea - but Masters has already flagged it in his blog, so I think it's probably a real invest. —AySz88\^-^ 23:32, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Seeing as the system is over "THE NORTH-CENTRAL GULF OF MEXICO" as mentioned in the TWO, I'd say its a for real system.--Nilfanion (talk) 23:47, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: My guess (pure speculation) is that the NRL is trying to decide whether to declare it an Invest (the NHC has mentioned it) and has not made a decision, but the internal "sandbox" declaration accidentally made it onto the Internet. Perhaps they use 60L-69L or 60L-79L or something for internal decisions (like our old "Areas of Interest")?CrazyC83 23:52, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  They seemed to fix the main page, I can't find 63L. 24.83.98.3 00:06, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Yep, that's it. bob rulz 01:58, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Nothing there now, though, except cirrus outflow (unless you count the hugemongeous red blob over southern AL and MS).  Plenty of upper-level divergence, but no lower-level convergence on their analysis.   On the bubble now - could be trouble if it regains organized convection, but could fizzle if it comes back popcorn-like (or doesn't occur at all). —AySz88\^-^ 02:49, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Those seem to be "outer bands"... CrazyC83 04:02, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Or not? It's still listed, although most of the clouds are overland now. Chacor 05:12, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It returned! Those overland clouds are moving southward. -- RattleMan 05:18, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: NRL's still showin it.  Looks messy to me... - Bladeswin | Talk to me | 12:50, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: WEAK low on multiple levels. Very small chance. -Winter123 21:56, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Is it that blob over Louisiana now? Or did it just dissipate? bob rulz 22:22, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't see anything there now.  I think its pretty much dead Jamie|C  15:39, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Gone. íslenska hurikein #12 (samtal) 21:37, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 95L.INVEST

message: Weird name. Well here it is in the Gulf of Mexico. Very Organized. íslenska hurikein #12 (samtal) 23:24, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: 63L is a Test Invest - perhaps a precursor to 95L and got on there accidentally? Whatever it is, it does look good. CrazyC83 23:31, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

text: (edit conflict) I have a feeling that header is an NRL tes(t). Whether the entire invest is a test, I have no idea - but Masters has already flagged it in his blog, so I think it's probably a real invest. —AySz88\^-^ 23:32, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Seeing as the system is over "THE NORTH-CENTRAL GULF OF MEXICO" as mentioned in the TWO, I'd say its a for real system.--Nilfanion (talk) 23:47, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: My guess (pure speculation) is that the NRL is trying to decide whether to declare it an Invest (the NHC has mentioned it) and has not made a decision, but the internal "sandbox" declaration accidentally made it onto the Internet. Perhaps they use 60L-69L or 60L-79L or something for internal decisions (like our old "Areas of Interest")?CrazyC83 23:52, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  They seemed to fix the main page, I can't find 63L. 24.83.98.3 00:06, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 63L.NRLTES

message: There's a 95L up on NRL now. I don't know if it's this system, though, since there's no satellite pictures of it up yet. I would assume it would be this. bob rulz 01:47, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, that's it. bob rulz 01:58, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Nothing there now, though, except cirrus outflow (unless you count the hugemongeous red blob over southern AL and MS).  Plenty of upper-level divergence, but no lower-level convergence on their analysis.   On the bubble now - could be trouble if it regains organized convection, but could fizzle if it comes back popcorn-like (or doesn't occur at all). —AySz88\^-^ 02:49, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Those seem to be "outer bands"... CrazyC83 04:02, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Or not? It's still listed, although most of the clouds are overland now. Chacor 05:12, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It returned! Those overland clouds are moving southward. -- RattleMan 05:18, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: NRL's still showin it.  Looks messy to me... - Bladeswin | Talk to me | 12:50, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: WEAK low on multiple levels. Very small chance. -Winter123 21:56, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Is it that blob over Louisiana now? Or did it just dissipate? bob rulz 22:22, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't see anything there now.  I think its pretty much dead Jamie|C  15:39, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Gone. íslenska hurikein #12 (samtal) 21:37, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 95L.INVEST