lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Dimorphotheca

message: The image on the page claims to be Osteospermum ecklonis, not Dimorphotheca ecklonis.  That's also the name by which I know it.  I've read that Dimorphotheca is supposed to be annual, while Osteospermum is supposed to be perennial, but that's a weak differentiation.  I have flowers that look identical to the photo, and they're definitely perennial.
Unfortunately, I don't know much background.  But the current article should at least mention this issue, and preferably present a justification for calling these flowers Dimorphotheca.  Groogle (talk) 02:00, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: These are synonyms according to the Dimorphotheca ecklonis taxobox, though a citation is needed. Unfortunately my work on synonymy was effectively stopped. Rich Farmbrough, 15:27, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Dimorphotheca or Osteospermum?

message: I have created a redirect to Dimporpotheca, since I was told that "star of the veldt" is D. calendulecea yet this page says it is D. sinuata, and Dimorphotheca ecklonis also claims the common name.  A more informed person my wish to add and remove the common name form the appropriate places. Rich Farmbrough, 15:27, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Star of the veldt
Talk:Tony DeMeo

message: I removed a large chunk of text added that appears to be plagarism, but kept reference to material--it's good and needs to be re-written properly.  Wikipedia is not a place where bulk text should be copied from another website, especially from an anonymous user.  However, the information is good and I'm glad to see that there is more to the coach's history worth documenting.  If someone else picks up the ball, that would be great--otherwise I'm sure I'll be properly adding in the information than another user found.--Paul McDonald (talk) 15:03, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The article looks a lot like his bio at UCWV, which is odd, because some of it is text that I wrote.  It doesn't bother me that they took it, it's just odd... and hard to tell who is responsible for writing the rest of the article!--Paul McDonald (talk) 06:45, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed plagarism 

message: I think the current editors are doing better.  I think that the books and especially DVDs read more like an ad than an article, though.  Still, it's looking  better.  When I get back from vacation, I plan to add more details about the records at other schools.  I  like it, it's  taking shape.--Paul McDonald (talk) 04:53, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: looking better...
Talk:Samuel Colgate Jr.

message: Could this be the only NCAA coach whose last name is the same as the college where he coached??--Paul McDonald (talk) 19:11, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: nope, Homer Rice is another. Jweiss11 (talk) 05:13, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting!  However, Rice University was named for William Marsh Rice who had no children.  Samuel Colgate's family is the reason that Colgate University is named Colgate University.  But that's pretty darned cool!--Paul McDonald (talk) 22:48, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Could it be?
Talk:Riggins v. Nevada

message: Yes! Sorry for the mistake. Regards, Mattisse 18:47, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does "fury" mean "jury"? 

message: We should totally add a redirect for David Riggins' name here, in case people get lost on how to find the case and the court decision. There should be some measure to make it easier and less confusing. ContributingHelperOnTheSide (talk) 20:55, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect
Talk:Leonid

message: Funny that the most famous Leonid was "forgotten", Leonid Brezhnev.
RGDS
Alexmcfire
:Yes, I created this page and after doing the work adding dozens of "Leonid"s, I realized it was a much bigger project than I thought.  There are still tons of people named Leonid that could be added.  Anyone else is welcome to take up the banner.  Alexmcfire, thanks for your contribution.  But, don't whine about it -- it's your job to have added Brezhnev.  That's what Wikipedia is all about. Thisis0 (talk) 01:56, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Bruh 188.241.45.25 (talk) 11:53, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Talk:1993 ATP Tour

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :1993 in tennis. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 25#1993 in tennis until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  PrimeHunter (talk) 13:45, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "1993 in tennis" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Erigeron annuus

message: A proposal to merge Erigeron strigosus into Erigeron annuus was made over two years ago.  According to Global Compositae Checklist, Erigeron strigosus Muhl. ex Willd. is the accepted species name, while Erigeron annuus subsp. strigosus (Muhl. ex Willd.) Wagenitz is considered to be a synonym of Erigeron strigosus Muhl. ex Willd. var. strigosis.  Since it appears that these articles should remain separate, I will remove the merge templates. Nonenmac (talk) 14:03, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re. merge proposal
Talk:Flavored tobacco

message: Hello Group 10! 1) I believe that Group 10 made substantial efforts to improve the article. It seems there was some difficulty in staying within the specific topic of “flavored” tobacco, especially since there is so much overlap between flavoring and the legalization of certain tobacco products. But overall, I think Group 10 did a great job at expanding important contemporary topics such as the use by youth, and made multiple changes in the wording of some sentences that improved the ease of reading. 2) From the edits that I see, I believe that the cited secondary sources were good choices. The group made multiple references to CDC and FDA, which are not only publicly available but are also organizations that have gathered many data to support its decisions. Jinaminjunglee (talk) 21:53, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  CP133 2019 Peer Edits 

message: *Adding information about Prop C on the last paragraph of RegulationsKuanHsuanWu (talk) 04:58, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  CP133 2019 Group 10 proposed edits
Talk:Gary D. Forsee

message: This article as currently written is hatchet job with the entry in December 2008.  I will try to clean it up. It doesn't help that there were no references. Americasroof (talk) 21:50, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Hatchet job
Talk:Battle of Chudnov

message: Why a polonism was used in the title for a place in Ukraine? --Irpen 00:58, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It was known as Cudnów than, but I am not opposed to a move. Feel free to correct the name in the campaignbox to simplify this in the future. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  12:38, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have no doubt that Polish sources called it Cudnow both back then and now. The Ukrainiane name of the place is Chudniv. English sources that mention the battle use either Battle of Chudnov (Russian name) or Battle of Chudniv. Both are fine with me. Gimme a couple of hours to so some research and expand the article. Several significant facts are omitted. --Irpen 17:14, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I just hope those facts are from modern reliable sources not XIX century Tsarist Russian histography, Soviet books or Panslavist texts about Poland. If you have such sources it would be best to show them here first for consideration, as they have proved to be highly controversial in portaying Polish history--Molobo (talk) 17:39, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  WP:AGF. Let's wait and see, shall we? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  19:10, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

text: Use Chudniv. Subtelny uses it. Ostap 22:01, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I will move the article soon.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  22:10, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Titile

message: Insufficient citations. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 16:19, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: B-class review failed
Talk:I Am (poem)

message: The poem appears to exist in two forms. The final two lines of the first stanza read:
"Like shadows in love’s frenzied stifled throes 
And yet I am, and live—like vapours tossed"
and
"Like shades in love and death's oblivion lost;
And yet I am, and live with shadows tost"
in another version. The two references in the article give one of each.
anything known?
Agingjb (talk) 15:46, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: There seem to be quite a number of different versions. I was hoping to find out more here. Snugglepuss (talk) 18:46, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Versions
Talk:Instituto Nacional de Lenguas Indígenas

message: I've seen lists and maps that give 52 as the stereotypical number of indigenous languages in Mexico. This includes some languages with only a dozen or so speakers. One of these numbers is wrong, or they're counting differently - the "hundreds" could be dialects, there must be dozens of dialects of Nahuatl alone. Homunq (talk) 03:14, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I read the catalog, and clarified this aspect of the article. Homunq (talk) 03:29, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hundreds?
Talk:Sacha Pitoëff

message: Although Swiss-born and with an apparently Ethnic Russian name, Pitoeff appears to be of Asian heritage.  Is there any reliable information on this?  A translation of the French Wikipedia article on him could be used to improve this one.  Barney Bruchstein (talk) 15:45, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ethnic heritage 

message: Born March 11, 1920
Died July 21, 1990 (aged 60)
Should be 70 years at the time of death, not 60. Please fix, couldn't repair the infobox myself.
Best regards, 212.248.42.90 (talk) 06:56, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age of death - infobox failure
Talk:Grobschnitt

message: There has never been a Grobschnitt recording called "Sonnentanz". By the way the link leads to a recording dated about 25 years after the date given in the list with no relation to any member of Grobschnitt. Delete it. --141.15.33.1 (talk) 10:38, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discography 
Talk:Ian Scott (actor)

message: An RfC which may affect this article's title is currently taking place (Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Pornography#RfC: Should a person who has appeared in exclusively pornographic films be described as "(actor/-tress)" or "(pornographic actor/-tress)"?). Rebecca1990 (talk) 21:33, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  (actor)/(pornographic actor) RfC 
Talk:West Side of Stamford

message: Must the "Ethnic" section be so ridiculous? This deserves a rewrite \ it is racist. (i.e. "Yay rise of Italian Americans, Boooo Illegals from California and Blacks!"
*Good point. That paragraph is now changed to avoid putting down groups and maintain neutrality. "Citation needed" tag also added to that paragraph. If information in the paragraph can't be footnoted, it will be deleted in time. Noroton (talk) 03:51, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
Category talk:Fossils

message: Well, I finally finished diffusing this category's jumbled mess of articles into more apropriate sub-categories. I left the most important fossil groups where they were, though. The category now has  than half what it did before I started and is consequently much easier to find the most relevent information. W00t! Abyssal leviathin (talk) 01:53, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Diffused Many Articles
Talk:Rock On (David Essex song)

message: This is a general reference source... not a local Music Mensa meeting.  Impress people somewhere else!  First there is no source for all this pretentious-sounding gobbledygook, so God only knows if it is even accurate, and second it is not written for a general audience anyway so it does not belong here.  If I were a music PhD, I would not be looking this up on Wikipedia, would I?  Would somebody please translate all this jargon-hooey into plain English that us heathens can understand, or else delete it?  Or at the very least, edit out the worst bits and source it properly?  Sheez.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.54.250.11 (talk) 22:45, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arrangement and Interpretation section... HUH??? 

message: The lengthy quote from Jeff Wayne includes the following: "And so I had this idea that there would nothing on it that played a chord,  ..."  I suspect that the actual wording was "there would BE nothing", however, I don't know that for sure. Rdvaldesdapena (talk) 12:44, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apparent Typographical Error
Talk:Chasen (band)

message: Why does it say the Christian rock thats only in one song.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.119.67.222 (talk) 00:44, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Genre

message: Who made this artical? I would like to talk about this artical.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.119.77.9 (talk) 23:24, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I started this article, but no one "owns" it. See WP:OWN. Everyone is welcome to contribute. Royalbroil 14:39, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Creator

message: Just so the origonal creator of this artical knows I am going to handle this artical from now on if their are no objections.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.29.34.221 (talk) 03:04, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There are no designated writers or authors, it's a collaboration. Feel free to expand it at will, but make sure that you cite reliable sources that you use to expand it. You should read WP:OWN as I have indicated above. I watch the progress of this and many other articles to make sure that they meets Wikipedia standards for tone, point of view, objectionable amount of advertising, etc. I would love to see this become an excellent article! Royalbroil 14:39, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

text: Be aware that this talk page is here to discuss Chasen's article, not to talk about them. Make sure that any information added to the article is published by the media. Speaking directly with them or their crew is not considered reliable because people have a tendancy to inflate things about themself (not saying that they would).  Royalbroil 18:00, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

text: Books, newspapers and magazines are considered to be the best sources. You should provide information on the sources used (what came from where). I can help you with that. Are you planning to use web based sources? I like adding the information from each source one at a tie so there's no doubt where it came from. This conversation would be a lot easier if you got a username to log in with. They're free and easy. Royalbroil 03:48, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Artical Adoption
Talk:Dulce River (Argentina)

message: I have added the citation to the lacking source. For more information consult www.ecoportal.net/content/view/full/68507.Carmaster 02:18, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Citation Added
Talk:Transfer of learning

message: I am in the process of copy editing this article in response to the copy edit tag as part of the GOCE Backlog Elimination Drive. Due to the size and complexity of the writing style, I will be working on this over the course of a few days at various times. dtgriffith [talk] 03:56, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy edit in progress 

message: It looks as though this article was written years ago as a class project in which different students worked on their own sections separately. The result is not very cohesive or coherent. I've written a new article, keeping bits and pieces from this one. If anyone is following this article and would like to object to me replacing the current body with User:Schazjmd/sandbox3, let me know. I'll wait a week or so before making any changes to this article. Thanks! Schazjmd (talk) 21:33, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite
Talk:Sierra Puebla Nahuatl

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :NHJ. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 16#NHJ until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:22, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "NHJ" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Iyabo Obasanjo

message: When I clicked at the "Did you know 27 December" link, I reached a page stating these links are only for recent articles. Is this true? If so, the link above can be deleted.Gallador (talk) 16:40, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Did You Know Link Stale?

message: Anything she did noteworthy and referenced.Gallador (talk) 16:40, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: More To Do
Talk:Musée de Cluny

message: It seems to me that the title of the page should be the museum's official name, Musée national du Moyen Age, with its old but still popular name of Cluny given as the secondary name. Was there any particular reason why the present set-up was chosen, redirecting from the correct name to the popular one? Awien (talk) 11:31, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Two and a half years with no objections being raised seems like enough. Going ahead and doing it. Awien (talk) 16:49, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I have seen the name seem to change on their site as well, though now it appears the "older" way, as "Musée de Cluny -- Musée national du Moyen Âge" http://www.musee-moyenage.fr/. Perhaps we should tweak the title again so it reads Musée de Cluny -- Musée national du Moyen Âge FULBERT (talk) 15:27, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Si vous êtes Français, Fulbert, joyeuse fête nationale. And as for going back to Musée de Cluny, I have no objection. That's what it'll always be in my mind anyway. Awien (talk) 18:42, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! I am American and just visited the museum again (for the 5th time) while on holiday. That is when I noticed the discrepancy with our naming here. Made the name change, and will likely need to tweak the page itself to make it consistent. Thanks for keeping on top of this!! FULBERT (talk) 13:16, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe my favourite museum in the world! And thank you too. Awien (talk) 16:57, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Museum name 

message: I am not sure I understand what was moved by  in the page move; I could not see any change or understand what happened. Anybody? FULBERT (talk) 16:29, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: There was a double hyphen in the page name - I simply removed one of them as it wasn't necessary. Brookie :)  { - like the mist - there  one moment and then gone!}  (Whisper...) 15:35, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks Brookie! FULBERT (talk) 16:58, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move 
Talk:Millettia

message: Panga panga (Millettia laurentii) An exotic and imported hardwood that has heartwood that is dark brown with very close, fine, almost black veins. The texture is coarse and the grain is straight to slightly wavy.
Works well with power tools. Blades must be kept sharp. Must pre-bore for fasteners. When filled, it can be brought to a nice finish. Native to Southern regions of Tanzania, Mozambique and the Congo region.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.224.200.32 (talk) 00:34, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
Talk:New York Public Library Main Branch

message: I put three more pictures of the flagpole bases in the commons category, and one each of Beauty and Truth.  Jim.henderson (talk) 06:25, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Pix

message: See main article in 5 minutes or so. 66.234.33.8 (talk) 19:37, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Disputed-inline closed to public 1st day

message: Technically, I don't believe this building is referred to within the library system as a "branch." (It is the central location for the Research Library, as opposed to a branch library—although ironically that distinction within the system is beginning to blur these days). Is there a better name we could use for the article? (I do not support using the recently conferred name of "Schwarzman Building" as the article name, as that name is not (at least not yet) in common parlance.) Newyorkbrad (talk) 22:18, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title 

message: This article should be updated to include more information over the Central Library Plan, its controversy, and the fact that it has been abandoned. The plan, involving Foster +Partners as architects, would have gutted the historic stacks beneath the main reading room. I'd write it but I don't have time at the minute.
Kiravae (talk) 20:07, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Central Library Plan 

message: It would be helpful to list the philanthropists, particularly the ones etched on the builidngs, who support NYC's leading public library. Also - how does NYPL come by its funding from New York State Public Education law, and how is that funding spent. Does NYPL pay property taxes? Does NYPL support public education in NYC? MissPhiled (talk) 14:02, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @MissPhiled, I think that question would be more appropriate for the Talk:New York Public Library page. This is about the building, not the library system. – Epicgenius (talk) 21:29, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who funds the NYPL, and for what?
Talk:Imperfect self-defense

message: I'll get more cites soon. Bearian (talk) 03:18, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please note that neither of the reference links provided actually link to the cases cited. They each link to different copies of the same recent Iowa case. That case, however, does cite both of the cases used here as references. I still think this should be merged into Self-defense (theory). --Evb-wiki (talk) 04:53, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

message: The Controversy section is uncited, and has been tagged since April. I am aware of no legal academic who argues the position put forth. I am being WP:Bold and removing it. --e Robert-Houdin 20:05, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy 

message: If someone wants to expand the article, it needs two big things: 1) the fact that, at least in the United States, it is a minority rule and 2) a list of which jurisdictions it is good law in. --Philosopher Let us reason together. via alternate account 13:59, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarity
Category talk:Cornish people

message: shouldn t it be :Category:Ethnically Cornish people to avoid confusion, as what led to the call for merge with :Category:People from Cornwall recently? (see link just above) Mayumashu (talk) 00:52, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It doesn't only include ethnically Cornish people (and how you'd define "ethnically Cornish" I have absolutely no idea in any case). It includes people associated with Cornwall, but not born or brought up in Cornwall. -- Necrothesp (talk) 18:48, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  page name
Talk:Plathymenia

message: "Plathymenia reticulata grows up to 30 metres (100 ft) tall...; in cerrado or savanna habitats, it is smaller..." In what habitats does P. reticulata reach its full 30 meters should be specified. If not in cerrado or savanna, then in rainforest? Well-watered suburbs? The reader does not know.--Wetman (talk) 19:44, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Polyalthia hookeriana

message: This name should be corrected. Article 60.11 of the code of nomenclature specifies that there should be no "i" before the "ana". Nadiatalent (talk) 12:33, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops! As User:Melburnian has pointed out at Talk:Grevillea hookeriana, the "i" is correct. The name is adjectival in form, not possessive. Nadiatalent (talk) 12:39, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling of the species name
Talk:HMS Delight (H38)

message: According to the 1977 BBC TV series The Secret War,  the sinking of the Delight was reported back to Germany using the Enigma code which was then intercepted by the RAF Y Service and then decoded and read at Bletchley Park, revealing that Delight had been sunk with the aid of something called 'Freya' - this was the first mention the British had had of any German radar - the Freya system.  The Freya station involved in the sinking was at Auderville and the actual Freyas used are pictured in the RAF PRU photograph at right.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.112.68.219 (talk) 16:51, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sinking