Talk:Stargate fandom

message: Does this mean 5:33am GMT? Simply south 17:10, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timing 

message: Is anyone going to write anything about this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.164.166.209 (talk) 18:02, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  GateWorld Play 

message: I noticed that Gateworld covers news on Battlestar Galactica even though it is not Stargate related. Why is that?--The Shadow Treasurer (talk) 06:28, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: GateWorld has always covered other scifi shows. It was just in the early 2000s that the focus was changed to Stargate, but they are still reporting about the other shows on their respective subpages. – sgeureka t•c 11:05, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Battlestar Galactica 

message: Umm, this article is an advertisement for a website. Is this allowed these days? I'm confused since an article of the same nature I posted once was removed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.114.169.144 (talk) 22:09, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see much promotional stuff, but that's a reason to cleanup, which anyone can do. – sgeureka t•c 10:15, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is an ad 

message: no consensus to move to GateWorld. Move to Stargate fandom to correct capitalization. Jafeluv (talk) 10:45, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Support. I agree with TheRealFennShysa Gateworld and Stargate Fandom should be separate articles. Powergate92Talk 20:11, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

text: *Comment - I've struck through your comment about the discussion being closed - I'm sorry, but that it not up to you to determine - especially since you've made edits canvassing for people to come here and vote. You are misinterpreing guidelines, since the survery section is part of the requested move procedure. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 23:49, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

text: *Comment. Gateworld and Stargate Fandom should be separate articles per WP:OFFTOPIC as Stargate fandom is "a community of people actively interested in the military science fiction film Stargate and the television shows" and GateWorld is "an English-language news site-based webpage for British-Canadian-American science fiction shows". Powergate92Talk 18:41, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  As GateWorld has insufficient evidence of having received "significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject" (meeting the Notability guideline), the information should preferably go somewhere (see WP:PRESERVE).  I think it fits fine in the fandom article as the website is an evidence of the topic; however, merging it into the overarching Stargate article would also make sense.  For now, since TIAYN is still working on the fandom article, I think we should assume good faith and see how it turns out before demanding its dismantling.  —  pd_THOR | =/\= | 18:47, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

text: Any additional comments: TheRealFennShysa (talk) 19:24, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Support. I agree with TheRealFennShysa Gateworld and Stargate Fandom should be separate articles. Powergate92Talk 20:11, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: *Comment - I've struck through your comment about the discussion being closed - I'm sorry, but that it not up to you to determine - especially since you've made edits canvassing for people to come here and vote. You are misinterpreing guidelines, since the survery section is part of the requested move procedure. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 23:49, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

text: *Comment. Gateworld and Stargate Fandom should be separate articles per WP:OFFTOPIC as Stargate fandom is "a community of people actively interested in the military science fiction film Stargate and the television shows" and GateWorld is "an English-language news site-based webpage for British-Canadian-American science fiction shows". Powergate92Talk 18:41, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  As GateWorld has insufficient evidence of having received "significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject" (meeting the Notability guideline), the information should preferably go somewhere (see WP:PRESERVE).  I think it fits fine in the fandom article as the website is an evidence of the topic; however, merging it into the overarching Stargate article would also make sense.  For now, since TIAYN is still working on the fandom article, I think we should assume good faith and see how it turns out before demanding its dismantling.  —  pd_THOR | =/\= | 18:47, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: :Any additional comments: TheRealFennShysa (talk) 19:24, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: This article is one of a  number selected for the early stage of the trial of the Wikipedia:Pending Changes system on the English language Wikipedia. All the articles listed at Wikipedia:Pending changes/Queue   are being considered for level 1 pending changes protection.
The following request appears on that page:
Comments on the suitability of theis page for "Pending changes"  would be appreciated.
Please update the Queue page as appropriate.
Note that I am not involved in this project any much more than any other editor, just posting these notes since it is quite a big change, potentially
Regards, Rich Farmbrough, 00:10, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: There's precisely one bit of information, which one anonymous editor keeps trying to add, which doesn't belong here. Indefinite semi seems fine, since there's very little call to actually edit this article. I expect there are other articles which would be better cases t try out flagged revisions on. Jclemens (talk) 05:25, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Pending changes

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Stargate fandom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090821055024/http://www.gateworld.net/news/2006/08/fans_rally_savestargatesg1.com.shtml to http://www.gateworld.net/news/2006/08/fans_rally_savestargatesg1.com.shtml
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071113032958/http://www.canada.com/theprovince/news/etoday/story.html?id=12108e5f-4ccc-4d67-aaf5-ca9f77edcc7e&k=25064&p=1 to http://www.canada.com/theprovince/news/etoday/story.html?id=12108e5f-4ccc-4d67-aaf5-ca9f77edcc7e&k=25064&p=1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:42, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018) 

message: Seems it's fairly common, though not in the majority of cases when a TV series is cancelled, for hard-core fans to organize a campaign to keep it going. Ought we have an article about how that works?
Jim.henderson (talk) 00:57, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Do we have reliable sources that cover this? If so, sure. If not, probably not yet. Jclemens (talk) 06:13, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fan campaign