lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:TV35 WDIG (Dublin,Ga)

message: Is this a broadcast television station? I can't find it listed on the FCC's web site. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 07:33, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

message: Hopefully no hard feelings, but the admins are confused in the differences of A3 and A7. 
;About A3
I have read Wikipedia:CSD#A3 like ten times now. The suggestion is that it could be a stub. In Wikipedia:Stub it says that "Note that if a small article has little properly sourced information, or if its subject has no inherent notability, it may be deleted or be merged into another relevant article." 
Here we have "little properly sourced information".(we have no properly sourced information).
;About A7
Although, the admins have expressed in the edit summary's that the article is notable the article does not express notability in any way. This article could fall under A7 just as well.
It might be best to have this article as a redirect to Dublin,Ga, rather than deleting the article. As the content of this subject grows in the Dublin,Ga, it may allow both requirements of notability and content to exist without question and thus the return of this article. R00m c (talk) 17:02, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  A3 or A7?
Talk:Nixon Moreno

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 15:04, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]] 

message: Nearly all of the info under "Political points of view" pertained to the rape accusations. I've moved this info to its own section. The political points of view section sits basically empty now, and could benefit from expansion by someone who is familiar with Moreno's politics. I also did a lot of grammar and POV cleanup. I believe that as the article stands now, it's appropriate to remove the weasel and peacock templates, which I've done. If you disagree with this decision, please give an explanation here and I'll try to clean up the POV further. I also added a refimprove template. This article contained many phrases that could be considered contentious, which I removed, but there are still issues with lack of sourcing. Discussion of the rape accusations in particular are problematic when unsourced, as unverifiable statements regarding the case are present in the article.
Thanks for reading! Skeletor3000 (talk) 20:19, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article overhauled and reorganized, more work to be done.
Talk:Sarah Kendall

message: The categories put her in the category of "1976 births" so why is this not mentioned in the main text of the article?Vorbee (talk) 17:37, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added it to the lead. DH85868993 (talk) 10:17, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Year of birth

message: This article says that "Sarah Kendall's Australian Trilogy" was broadcast in 2017, but it has also been broadcast on BBC Radio 4 in August and September 2018. Vorbee (talk) 17:38, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Sarah Kendall's Australian Trilogy

message: I've linked to the wikipedia articles for awards where Sarah Kendall is listed as a nominee or winner and found links to several where the relevant Wikipedia page does not list her. There are two that I haven't been able to find sources for and I have tagged those. Is it safe to remove the Unreferenced banner for the Awards section? Jakepat (talk) 09:56, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: There being no objections or otherwise, I will remove the unreferenced banner Jakepat (talk) 09:11, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations added for Awards - remove Unreferenced banner?
Talk:Niharika Singh

message: http://www.aspisdrift.com/2008/11/why-niharika-singh-is-here-to-stay.html
http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2010-05-23/news-interviews/28306277_1_kannada-film-first-film-niharika-singh  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Niharika.singh31 (talk • contribs) 13:20, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links  
Talk:Methylsergide maleate

message: Why should this article be deleted? It has content whatsoever, has yet no external links, "See also" section, but still references, category tag, template tag, interwiki link. Mikael Häggström (talk) 07:55, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, doesn't matter - there was an existing article on the topic. Mikael Häggström (talk) 08:10, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Ismet Đuherić

message: Any relation to the Sijekovac killings? Strange village, that... --Joy [shallot] (talk) 12:24, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sijekovac? 
Talk:Nenad Medić

message: I removed the claim that Medic chose not play basketball professionally, lacking proper referencing.  I consider it highly suspect that he had any pro prospects given his stats at Waterloo, not exactly a hoops powerhouse.   Doctofunk (talk) 19:52, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What evidence points to Medic self-identifying as Canadian over Serb or Serbian, when he clearly uses "Serb" as his online pseudonym and nickname, not "Canadian". --A.Molnar (talk) 06:14, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: He was born in Apatin, Serbia, Yugoslavia, but is a Canadian citizen, Wikipedia:Manual of Style (biographies) states that in the opening paragraph  "In the normal case this will mean the country of which the person is a citizen or national, or was a citizen when the person became notable." and that "Ethnicity should generally not be emphasized in the opening unless it is relevant to the subject's notability". ▪◦▪≡SiREX≡Talk 06:30, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

text: It's been stated on ESPN and on Cardplayer that he's Canadian If you have a source that states he has dual citizenship with Serbia please provide it, then his dual citizenship can be noted in the article, to say he must hold dual citizenship because both countries allow it, albeit a logical conclusion is considered original research and is not allowed.▪◦▪≡SiREX≡Talk 09:33, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

text: You could ask him to say so in a reliable third party publication such as Cardplayer.com or PokerNews.com, it must not be you asking yourself, then using your private conversation as the reason for the edit, as that would be WP:OR. Verifiability is the threshold, so it very well may be that he holds more then one citizenship but it needs to be verified. thank you. ▪◦▪≡SiREX≡Talk 21:25, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

text: I'm just going to let the last edit stand as this may end being a WP:LAME editwar, as it can be said he is Serbian-Canadian irrespective of citizenship, however ethnicity shouldn't be emphasized and does touch on Nationalism which shouldn't be done when editing just facts, an another editor or admin may still object though.▪◦▪≡SiREX≡Talk 18:01, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canadian or Serb? 
Talk:Mooka Line

message: While I kind of agree Mooka should be the "correct" romanization,　The city government and the railway company seem to consistently use Mōka (admittedly, often without a macron), for their official website, trains, and the station. So if we are to follow "use the official spelling" rule, I guess it should be Mōka rather than Mooka. The probrem is, it may be possible they are just being sloppy of English names (as Maxima m claimed so on Talk:Miki Railway Miki Line), and we often don't know which is the case. Kzaral (talk) 08:18, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: While the railway company apparently chooses use "Moka", 真岡 should correctly be romanized as "Mooka". It is Mo + Oka, not "Mou + Ka", so "Mōka" is not really correct. --DAJF (talk) 09:47, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Romanization of 真岡
Talk:Acanthochitona thileniusi

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 . It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  --– Sadalmelik ☎ 19:02, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Vayssierea cinnabarea

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 . It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  --Bilby (talk) 02:16, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: According to Bill Rudman, a highly regarded sea slug expert, this taxon may be identical to two other "species" with a similar way of life. See . Invertzoo (talk) 22:00, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Validity of this species?
Talk:Jack Sheppard (cave diver)

message: There is a conflict here with Wookey Hole Caves which claims :
"In 1935, two Post Office engineers, Graham Balcombe and John Arthur "Jack" Sheppard penetrated 170 ft (52 m) into the cave, reaching "Chamber 7" using standard diving dress. The event was the first successful cave dive in Britain."
Derek Andrews (talk) 11:26, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You've got a sharp eye.  Unfortunately I've lent out all my history of cave diving books (eg Martyn Farr's book) to be able to check it out.  I don't think there is really a conflict; it's the same pair of guys trying out different sets of equipment in caves within 20 miles of each other in roughly the same year.  I'm pretty sure that the Wookey Hole dive was using the old-fashioned brass helmet style diving equipment which is fed from the surface by a hose.  I think the Swildon's dive used a self-contained oxygen rebreather apparatus.  Depending on how you define it, one of them counts as the first, but since it involved the same guy in both instances, he remains the pioneer.  For tourism purposes, Wookey Hole has an interest in claiming to be the first.  But actually doing it self-contained is a whole different kettle of mud and probably represents the actual break-through.Goatchurch (talk) 23:13, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It sounds like maybe there are two 'firsts', and both articles just need some rewording to qualify exactly what happened in each? I'll have a look in Balch's book and see if that is any more specific, otherwise I will leave it to the experts. Derek Andrews (talk) 23:31, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

text: It is more of a conflict than a dispute. If you have the reference material to re-write both these articles, that would be great! Derek Andrews (talk) 10:22, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks to User:Tim P who pointed out [this reference] I have now edited both articles and removed the dispute tags.— Rod talk 20:24, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disputed
Talk:The Palace

message: Over the past months, TV episodes have been redirected by (to name a couple) TTN, Eusebeus and others. No centralized discussion has taken place, so I'm asking everyone who has been involved in this issue to voice their opinions here in this centralized spot, be they pro or anti. Discussion is here . Even if you have not, other opinions are needed because this issue is affecting all TV episodes in Wikipedia. --Maniwar (talk) 02:40, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Centralized TV Episode Discussion 

message: A nice round-up of critical reaction to the first episode has been compiled by The Guardian here. Brad (talk) 22:00, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. I'm going to try and improve the reception section this evening or tomorrow. --UpDown (talk) 08:01, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception 

message: There is an argument going on between myself, and another member of Wikipedia.
I say this programme and many others airs on a channel called ITV - he/she says it's ITV1.
The fact is, there is no such channel called ITV1. ITV1 is a brand name, used for ITV in England, Wales, Southern Scotland, Isle of Man and the Channel Islands. The brand name for the channel is Central and the North of Scotland is STV, and in Northern Ireland, it's UTV.
All of these brands together, ITV1, STV and UTV are part of the ITV Network, which is usually just refered to as ITV. Using the ITV1 brand in these articles is selfish to those in most of Scotland and Northern Ireland, who don't see or hear the ITV1 name.
What are your thoughts on this matter?GMctalk 14:53, 09 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think a wider discussion is now being held at the talk of Talk:Agatha Christie's Poirot, so better to centralise there I think.--UpDown (talk) 13:58, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  ITV or ITV1
Talk:Holy Cross High School (Queens)

message: A lot of this is taken from the school's website....--Surfaced (talk) 08:43, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ryan Torain

message: Torain is notable because he is a a Top 10 running back prospect in the 2008 NFL Draft. Here are a few links to show his college notability, and thus his value in the upcoming draft:
*1
*2
*3
*4
I can find more if necessary. Google's your friend.►Chris NelsonHolla! 08:43, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: Though I'm sure she's a fine person, it's unclear what Torain's non-wikified purported classmate's name adds. Dadofsam (talk) 01:30, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Molly Brown? 

message: From the article: He resided in the Montara Neighborhood before moving to Shawnee Mission during his high school years
Nobody moves to Shawnee Mission; there is no such place. There is a Shawnee Mission School District, a Shawnee Mission postoffice, and the old Shawnee Indian Mission. In the past, the term Shawnee Mission was sometimes hyphenated, indicating the cities of Shawnee and Mission. Trust me, there is no such place, and no one lives there.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.70.157.191 (talk) 23:21, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mistake I found 

message: The picture is of fellow NFL player DeAngelo Hall, not Torain.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:85:4600:22E:A81B:1D26:66E8:310 (talk) 17:35, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture Mistake
Talk:Glen Wilkinson

message: Just a note to explain why the image has been removed. I tried to get it smaller (as the size was too big) and also to add it in the infobox but I have been unable to get it to work so maybe someone else might be able to.--♦Tangerines♦·Talk 17:50, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image
Talk:Macquarie Island Station

message: Hello,
as i am no native english speaker, perhaps somebody may expand the article with adding this new developments:
Macca Station permanently to be closed in 2017: http://www.antarctica.gov.au/news/2016/change-in-operations-on-macquarie-island/ and 
Macca Station not to be closed but to be rebuild: http://www.antarctica.gov.au/news/2016/government-invests-in-new-station-on-macquarie-island
Cheers, Hajo
http://www.antarctica.gov.au/news/2016/change-in-operations-on-macquarie-island/
http://www.antarctica.gov.au/news/2016/government-invests-in-new-station-on-macquarie-island
Hajo68 (talk) 15:13, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Macca Station to be closed permanently and then decided to be rebuild 

message: Does anyone know if the time zone is correct? The article has it at GMT+10, but the time-zone computer code I have (in the Java language) has it as GMT+11. The Time in Australia page also has it at GMT+11. —MiguelMunoz (talk) 06:58, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Time Zone?
Talk:Barycentric Dynamical Time

message: This is a bit confused.  I'm not sure what is being talked about here.
::This rate difference means, according to some scientists,  that physical constants have different values in TCB than they do in TDB.  Changing software from the traditional TDB values to the recommended TCB values would require considerable effort, but please note the considerations in the next paragraph.
::Relativists accept Einstein's Principle of Equivalence (see general relativity), so that fundamental physical constants are the same in all inertial coordinate systems, and most do not use alternate definitions of the second as, for example, set up in TDB or TCB, these seeming to be fossils of early attempts to define absolute time.  Relativists who are familiar with general relativity insist that there is no unambiguous way to compare the rates of clocks separated from each other in space or in time, or in relative motion to one another, nor to so compare measures of length and so on. Attempts to set up such comparisons are bound to fail when pursued to higher and higher accuracy. These comparisons and equations that model them may, however, be useful in limited contexts, though they are not normally regarded as a basis for defining different units.
Roadrunner (talk) 17:01, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Similarly, what is this in relation to time on our planet? In other words, how about relating it to Earth time so we know what this is and how it is relevant to us. Chaosdruid (talk) 00:22, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Melo amphora

message: * First time I've created a new page. Hope I've done it right. There should be a redirection from Melon Shell to here. There should be some external references. Raichu2 (talk) 09:20, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Chief Minister of Sabah

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Comment, after reviewing other articles, it seems that the convention is to name the article as a list. I actually followed existing articles: Chief Minister of Penang, and Chief Minister of Sarawak. So i guess i am leaning in favor of retitling this article and the other 2 articles mentioned as a list.  kawaputratorque 12:19, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Jeremy Fisher (author)

message: I have commenced a tidy-up of the Bibliography section using cite templates. Capitalization and punctuation follow standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, as much as Wikipedia templates allow it. Feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 07:37, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography 
Talk:Kerry Greenwood

message: The article gives the date of Fairies as 2005.
This is misleading. According to the copyright page of the volume, that was US publication. The book came out in Australia in 2001. Plot elements make it clear the book belongs before the 2002 entry on the list.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.94.82.148 (talk) 17:25, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of "Away With Fairies" 
Talk:Torsten Krol

message: I had tagged the article for notability, and you subsequently removed the tag on the basis that the article references several newspapers. Notability has to be shown not just through having independent, reliable sources but also there must be significant coverage in those sources. The significant coverage in this case needs to be about Krol himself, not reviews of his books. Most of the references in the article are to reviews of the books with a small amount of coverage about Krol. I would argue that it is not possible to have an article here that is substantially about Krol, because nobody knows anything about him, other than that he lives in Australia. Wikipedia is based on facts, not speculation. It is not a place to piece together a synthesis of information - that is considered original research. As such, I think there remains a notability debate to be had, and I don't think you're independent enough from the article to be able to assess it. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 12:19, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 
Talk:Tim Metcalf

message: Possibly I used the wrong edit summary, but my point is that BLP info must always be very clearly sourced, and all info must be relevant to the subject's notability.  It is acceptable to include statements such as "Tim Metcalf is married and has two children."  But there is no need to reveal the names and personal details of the children, one of whom appears to be a minor. Qwyrxian (talk) 07:46, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed family info
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Resource Exchange/Shared Resources

message: If you can communicate in German or the user mentioned in the list there is able to understand (at least simple) English you have additional access to useful databases because academic libraries in the German speaking countries have a lot of licensed databases with English content. If you are unable to write in German or to find an English-speaking de.Wikipedia user feel free to post your question in English at the request page:
w:de:Wikipedia_Diskussion:Bibliotheksrecherche --Historiograf (talk) 10:15, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: German version of this project

message: There seems to be nothing listed in regards to television programmes and movies. The Power Rangers page just had an issue with a casting calls website (Actor Access) being rejected as a source, even though it confirmed that it's 18th season is in production, and notes six ranger colours thus confirming that it's based on Samurai Sentai Shinkenger. What sources are suitable for television and movie casting? Digifiend (talk) 10:25, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Television and movies
Talk:Fordney–McCumber Tariff

message: This page needs major revision.  It does not explain what the tariff did and it is written poorly.  69.86.108.50 (talk) 15:05, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The sentence is a complete non-sequitur. If there is no objection, I'll remove it where it appears. Global Cerebral Ischemia (talk) 12:47, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Low Quality