lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Key School

message: This article is very subjective and biased, not at all like a competent encyclopedia article.  Please revise.
:I think it's well-written myself, but I've removed a couple POV terms, as well as some minor grammar errors. I do think this article should list some former headmasters, such as Ron Golblat. Lizardking42 17:30, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: i'm ordinarily very sensitive to bias in articles., but i don't see anything but factual statements here. the tags have been there apparently for 18 months and no one seems overly concerned. i'm removing them.Toyokuni3 (talk) 05:08, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

text: Granted, I spelled his name wrong.  However, I'm pretty sure Mr. Magus wouldn't like his last name spelt Mr. Maggotpiss.  Lizardking42 15:49, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: This is just a note to say that with this edit I re-instated a version of the page that has been edit warred over. I did this because the entire article, bar a small part of the lead section, was blatantly copied from various parts of the school website. This must not be reinstated as we have a responsibility to make sure that articles do not contain copyrighted material, especially when it is so blatant. -- Mrmatiko (talk) 06:13, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violations 

message: Please do not mention the faculty member in question in the main article until there is a confirmed result of their trial. WP:SUSPECT is clear that we should not discuss allegations against non-public figures. I am very concerned about the allegations, and could say a lot about them, but nonetheless this page is not the place. WikiMaster111 (talk) 20:37, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  2021 espionage charges against a faculty member
Talk:Líf and Lífþrasir

message: Is it correct that Líf is the female and Lífþrasir the male? Other sources of information on the web seem to contradict this.
77.248.230.207 (talk) 05:19, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like a mix up. I've since fixed it. :bloodofox: (talk) 06:11, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It is certaintly not as clear as some assume. In the fjólsvinnsmál Agilaz Svipdagr asks Fjolsvith what the maidservants of Menglöd is called. She has nine maidservants, the first of whom are called Hlif and the next Hliftrasa. Maybe it is a pun, maybe intentionally put to provoke the thought that in the next world humanity will transgender. More conservatively put, Hliftrasr seems like a masculine ending, and Hliftrasa a feminine one. Xact (talk) 05:16, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: About the gender of Líf and Lífþrasir
Talk:Lenin Prize

message: Natalia Shpiller is said to have been awarded the Lenin prize in 1951, at a time when it was not awarded.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.152.184.222 (talk) 10:18, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Some of the years after 1956 are not evenly numbered.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.152.184.222 (talk) 10:22, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  1951
Talk:Louis Roederer

message: the Roederer family & estate are fine folks, along Hiway 128, in Anderson Valley, Mendocino Co. Yes, they're distance cousins of the french Roederer family. Scharffenberger aint bad either. Here are your required tildes 76.218.248.127 (talk) 01:19, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Acquisitions
Talk:University College Hospital

message: I am searching for a John Smith (a Surgeon) who was employed at your hospital in 1960.
:—Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.162.245.34 (talk • contribs)  21:49, 12 December 2006
::This is not a contact tracing service. Anyone is free to search the GMC website to see if a doctor is currently registered (goto http://www.gmc-uk.org) David Ruben  Talk  00:34, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Fiery Cross (novel)

message: Proposed: one single page for all novels in the Outlander series. Prtwhitley (talk) 03:46, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll try to work on this idea. It would be better than having to go back to the Diana Gabaldon page for the list of novels in the serie. Nslarocque (talk) 19:57, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: FYI the article Outlander series now exists.— TAnthonyTalk 22:09, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposal
Talk:Ludington Light

message: I think that this should be called the Ludingion North Breakwater Light, as there is another (and equally important) Ludington North Pierhead Light.  What do you think?  11:10, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Name Change needed?

message: These links have been tagged as of concern since 2012 so have been reviewed per Wikipedia:External_links#Maintenance_and_review. They do not appear to meet the requirements at WP:EL, failing WP:ELNO#1 at least. The links are mostly fairly general, and are not always specific to this lighthouse, offering little encyclopedic content that cannot simply be written into the article, using the links as sources. Because they may be of use to editors wishing to work on the article they have been moved here. If, after examination, a link is found not to be useful it can be removed from this list. If the link does prove useful, appropriate information can be summarised in the article, using the link as a reliable source if it meets the WP:RELIABLE criteria, and then the link can be removed from this list. Be aware that, per WP:ELBURDEN, none of these links should be returned to the article without first gaining consensus. SilkTork (talk) 10:44, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Excessive External links
Template talk:Bots

message: Where is this tag placed on a page? At the very beginning, or somewhere else? Also, perhaps a stupid question, does the tag need to be placed explicitly on the page that one wants to deny a bot from, or can it being placed on a talk page also affect the bot's parsing of the associated article, or does it have to be placed on each page one wants to deny the bot from parsing?  Its position is not explicitly mentioned in WP:SECTIONORDER. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 21:43, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The placement of the template shouldn't matter as bots will, in general, scan all templates on the page for  or . Bots will likely not go out of their way to check the associated talk page of an main page and vice versa - only the page they are editing there and then will be checked. Aidan9382 (talk) 09:14, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Placement on a page 
Talk:Japan International Cooperation Agency

message: Hi, I work agricultural extension manager of Bulgan province of Mongolia.In my country now's agricultural sitution is not good,agricultural productivity and income is very low, rural poverty is high, 35 persent of the population province living poor, agricultural extension capacity very low.I want to study in Japan, I want to have good skill and knowledge of  how to grow of the varios vegetable in greenhouse for my coldest cointry. Reason why from China to Mongolia have been coming bad quiality vegetable in latest 15 year, so that is now day's food satefy's sitution is dangerouis, I think that.I want to extend my skills if I will be have a chanse good skill and knowledge after traning in Japan.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.179.11.42 (talk) 08:06, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  I want to study in Japan 

message: The  lady sent her address 105.245.173.16 (talk) 14:25, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  English
Talk:Syd Field

message: Where was he born? where was he educated?  And most importantly, when did he start working in the movie industry?  More background biographical details about him would contribute to the article. John Hyams 21:03, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, what is the year of his birth? Robert K S (talk) 21:20, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  More about his life 

message: I found the official website for this man.  SydField.com Go to the "About Section" for a potentially better image than the one here.  Hey, at least this page will have a link.  mikecucuk 11:03, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  This might help 

message: The criticism section includes information without a citation. This violates the Wikipedia's policies on verifiability and on maintaining a neutral point of view. I removed the information twice, but another editor here reverted that without including citation. No good reason for including this information without a citation has been presented. 71.96.27.217 (talk) 20:45, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The claim regarding verifiability stands as of WP:V, but in regards to npov, the criticisms are presented in a purely factual manner. - Fastily  (talk)  20:55, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Without citations, criticism sections are not neutral. The information should be removed until citations are added. I've read Syd Field's book, and the criticisms raised aren't even accurate. The section is also needlessly vague. If someone specific made those criticisms, that should be included in the article as well. 71.96.27.217 (talk) 16:14, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Criticism section

message: I removed the reference to Michael Bhatty as it seems irrelevant to an article on Syd Field. Maybe (maybe) in an article on the paradigm itself, but not here.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Focomoso (talk • contribs) 01:05, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Michael Bhatty

message: He was born on December 19, 1935.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.237.34.211 (talk) 22:15, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: , thank you. Jonno - (Wanna talk?) 06:54, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of Birth 
Talk:CBOFT-DT

message: Is this station also headquartered at the CBC Ottawa Broadcast Centre, like it's anglophone CBOT counterpart? -Daniel Blanchette 21:01, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Millard South High School

message: we should get a list of all state championships added
Dysalot 21:02, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: State Championships

message: I've removed a list of three alumni from the lead section of the article; and, after another editor reverted my removal, reverted that editor's reversion.
According to MOS:LEAD, "[t]he lead section should briefly summarize the most important points covered in an article".  In an article about a school, the famous or semi-famous alumni are certainly not one of the most important points.
The excised list included only three of the six people listed in the article's "Notable alumni" section.  No reason was given, nor is there any obvious reason, for the inclusion of those three and the exclusion of the others.  I suspect that these three were added by editors who felt that they were particularly important-- and I emphasize "felt": I suspect that this was a matter of the editors' personal opinions, and not based on any kind of universally accepted quantitative measure of notability.  This suspicion is supported by the fact that the IP editor who reverted my excision of the list had previously added a name thereto, preceded by "and most notably..." without any kind of citation to support the statement.  Ammodramus (talk) 02:54, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable alumni in lead paragraph
Talk:Audio multicore cable

message: 82.57.67.88 (talk) 08:54, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

message: The CobraNet/EtherSound section could just link to the Audio over Ethernet page, where they are both given treatment. --BenFranske 19:03, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: CobraNet/EtherSound

message: It looks like nobody has discussed this yet... In my experience Multicore cables are the same as Snake cables, just as Snake boxes are the same as multi boxes. So I vote merge unless anybody can demonstrate a difference between the two. --Davidkazuhiro 04:55, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Snake 

message: Is "multicore" a British equivalent to "snake" or something?  When I came to the article on Audio Multicore Cable, I expected to see an article describing multi-pair cabling used in analog audio systems.  You know, large cables with hundreds of twisted pairs inside.  I don't see what relevance digital snakes have in this article at all, other than to mention that the primary alternative to using multicore cabling is to use digital snakes.  I don't think that this article needs a specific (and unreferenced) criticism of each and every digital audio technology.  Any thoughts? Snottywong (talk) 02:31, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There should be a separate article written about the application of connecting digital audio between FOH and the stage. The article Audio over Ethernet doesn't adequately cover Digidesign's use of AES10: coaxial BNC-terminated video-style cables. It also doesn't cover optical cables used as a snake. This article should remain solely about multiple twisted pairs of copper wire inside a single sheath. Binksternet (talk) 14:56, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: All in favor of deleting the entire "Digital Multicore" section?Snottywong (talk) 18:02, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Digital multicore? 

message: Dimitri Snakelbee, really??? I can't say true or not but it sounds fishy. This needs a citation, I added a citation tag to track.
:Bullshit. Removed. Binksternet (talk) 15:50, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dimitri Snakelbee?
Talk:Second Sight (video game)

message: The plot and story description of the article seems quite long, and Wikipedia policy clearly states that:
"Wikipedia articles on works of fiction should contain real-world context and sourced analysis, offering detail on a work's achievements, impact or historical significance, not solely a summary of that work's plot"
It looks to me that the overly long plot description seems to go against Wikipedia official policy.
:It doesn't seem to be that long. There are many other plot summaries all over Wikipedia that are just as long, if not longer. Plus, and I may be incorrect here, but that policy applies to written works, not video games. -Xeon25 23:08, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks pretty long to  me. The whole article looks like one long game guide/walkthrough. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. And the template for overly long plot summmeries says focus on discussing the work rather than simply reiterating the plot. I'm pretty sure these policies apply to all articles about fictional universes including games. Wikipedia:Manual of Style (writing about fiction) says that an article can have a "summary of the plot or elements of character and exposition, treated briefly, and clearly defined as fictional", notice the word "breifly". that's just one example of what the manual says. After a quick read throgh of the manual, I think this article is quite long and focuses more on the plot, without much focus on the things that the manual suggests (just read the Perspective section to see what the manual suggests). Plus most of the article is written mostly in-universe.
The entire 'comedy' section ranks among the most inane Wikipedia entries of all time.--58.28.143.188 12:29, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Please join our project to upgrade this article to featured status.
</div>
== Possible Character List ==
Is it possible to create a sub-page of this article, to list the characters involved in the game, much like other titles such as L.A. Noire? GUtt01 (talk) 14:22, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Help improve our long-awaited [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Crytek UK|Wikiproject]]!

message: Is it possible to create a sub-page of this article, to list the characters involved in the game, much like other titles such as L.A. Noire? GUtt01 (talk) 14:22, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible Character List
Talk:Willingness to communicate

message: Huh?  in laymen's terms please!  Taco325i 21:07, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Seriously that list tells you NOTHING about what the items in the list mean. That is terrible. PROVIDE THE FREAKIN' INFORMATION WHEN YOU POST THINGS AND DON'T EXPECT EVERYBODY TO ALREADY KNOW WHAT COMPLICATED TERMS AND PHRASES MEAN!35.10.217.82 (talk) 11:08, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  STUB! 

message: I find it a bit disappointing that a large section of this article is devoted to what seems to be a not particularly insightful MA thesis published in a very obscure journal (it starts with a quote from Mother Tongue FFS) - I will try to clean it up at some point, if I have time. 阝工巳几千凹父工氐 (talk) 09:50, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  WTC in China
Talk:Jessica Amanda Salmonson

message: I started to add the publisher to the selected bibliography,  but I can't find the publisher for a lot of these. 64.129.172.15 (talk) 03:12, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography 
Talk:Limiter

message: http://www.radiomanual.info/schemi/Surplus_Civil/SGC_SG-2020_user.pdf describes an up-converting vogad 
Also there is a post here: https://www.eham.net/ehamforum/smf/index.php?topic=46609.0;wap2
"Processors work by producing an SSB signal (can be by the phasing method) clipping the peaks, and then demodulating back to audio and filtering before feeding the tx."
David.J.Greaves (talk) 15:50, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: In aerospace and military
Talk:Equalization filter

message: Maybe some example graphs showing the input and output of an equalizer would make it more clear. --Bernard François 10:51, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Graphs

message: It seems to me that the "problem" with mixing would only occur if one were to mix the equalized and "dry" signal -- a questionable practice at best.  Can someone justify this "problem"? -- algocu 20:12, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mixing and phase shift 

message: There are several phrases like this: 
  "A high Q means that only a few frequencies are affected, whereas a low Q affects many frequencies."
wouldn't it be more accurate to say 
 "A high Q means that only a narrow frequency range is affected, whereas a low Q affects a wide frequency range?"
Is the implication that a named frequency implies a range strong enough that we don't need to be, well, clear?--Elvey (talk) 18:01, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds good to me. SpinningSpark 23:49, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: What sounds good?  The way it is or the change I'm considering?  I'll assume the latter.--Elvey (talk) 20:35, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh sorry, I meant your wording is good (and more accurate) SpinningSpark 21:34, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Frequencies vs Frequency Ranges
Category talk:Images that should be in SVG format

message: There's a shortcut to the category, CAT:SVG --Dave the Rave (DTR)talk 15:42, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shortcut 

message: For example, in Anglosphere, :Image:Anglospeak.svg (1.71M) replaced :Image:Anglospeak.png (47K), meaning inflation by a factor of about 36. It doesn't make sense to blindly convert if the effect on performance is so bad. --JWB (talk) 18:44, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The SVG is then rendered back into a PNG by Wikimedia for viewing in the browser.  The PNG on the image description page for this image is only 84k at 800px wide.  See . --ChrisRuvolo (t) 13:27, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ballooning size from SVG conversion 

message: I am using my best English to follow "Instructions for converting to SVG" to update File:Ringstone.jpg and failed.
I did step 1, 2 and 3, and at step 3, I click "Save", and got the following error:
Error: No image by that name exists. Please make sure to use the correct format: ｛｛vector version available|new image name.svg｝｝.
In fact the step 3 description is very unclear. It says "Go back to the original file and edit the page.", but neither step 2 nor step 1 suggested correcting a new file, so there is only one file (with only different versions), how can a user go back to the original file when he is at it? I assume if step 3 is correct, step 2 must be wrong, instead of using "Upload a new version of this file" step 2 should have suggested "Upload file". Or, if Step 2 is correct, step 3 must be incorrect, it should be "rename the file extension from jpg to svg and update the links".
Even funnier, I uploaded the SVG using "Upload a new version of this file" to upload the SVG, and could not download it any longer. The size is displayed correctly in File History (new svg is 7kb, bigger than jpeg before), but if I click it, I get a jpeg file at 4kb, exactly the old version before I upload the SVG.
张韡武 (talk) 15:07, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Instruction not clear 

message: Every time I try to upload a new SVG version, it tells me the MIME Filetype is wrong, how to I change or be able to upload a new SVG version? Casperruegg (talk) 12:56, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  MIME Filetipe 

message: When we upload an SVG version of a file, we're supposed to replace all instances of the old file with the new one in all of the articles that the old one appears in.  That is an amazingly daunting task with some of the images, specifically those that have numerous page links.  Is there a bot that can do that automatically?  Thanks! --DustyComputer (talk) 01:11, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bot to replace old versions in articles?
Talk:Rjukan Line

message: The term 'kalkammonsalpeter', which appears in the Rjukan Line#Decline section refers to some type of nitrate, possibly calcium nitrate? Its not potassium nitrate, since potassium-  seems to be pott- .Pyrotec (talk) 19:18, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Norsk / English
Talk:County Route 17 (Suffolk County, New York)

message: This article says that the NY 111 / CR 17 junction was originally an at-grade interchange.  What is an at-grade interchange?  That to me sounds like a contradiction, since interchanges are grade seperated, not at-grade.
:At-grade interchanges have connecting ramps without bridges. ----DanTD (talk) 13:10, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have a picture or map or anything showing the former configuration of the intersection?  Was it signalized or unsignalized?  I assume that it always favored current CR 17, probably a throwback to when it used to be NY 111.  Did you see the old configuration anywhere on the Internet, or is it just from your personal memory?  Are there any nearby current intersections that are similar to the former configuration of the NY 111 / CR 17 intersection?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.187.247.122 (talk) 17:34, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm afraid I don't have any old pics, but it wasn't signalized. No, I can't find it on the net, and I wish I could, along with the big overhead destinations signs mounted on the corner. You could try some libraries close to the area, or even contact NYSDOT. ----DanTD (talk) 19:00, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is an at-grade interchange? 

message: The article says "The NY 111 designation was moved from Carleton Avenue to Islip Avenue, which runs parallel to Carleton Avenue between NY 27A and I-495, on September 13, 1966 in order to facilitate access to the Heckscher State Parkway."  Instead of switching the roads, why didn't they just build the interchange with Carlton Ave (then NY 111) rather than with Islip Ave (then CR 17)?
:I'm sure part of it had to do with the proposal to extend Northern State Parkway into Heckscher State Parkway. The interchange was supposed to be just east of Carleton Avenue, where the Parkway turns from east to south. Will somebody bring SignBot here? ----DanTD (talk) 13:18, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That makes sense; an interchange at Carlton Ave would have been too close to the proposed interchange with the Northern State Parkway.  Since the Northen State was never extended, they were later able to build an interchange at Carlton Ave.  So, the designations ended up being switched for nothing.  I'm curious: was there ever any controversy over the routings being switched?  Or did it happen quietly and few people noticed?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.187.247.122 (talk) 17:37, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You're asking the wrong guy. As I mentioned in the previous message, try some local libraries, or NYSDOT. ----DanTD (talk) 19:02, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why were NY 111 and CR 17 switched?