lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:TVes

message: Three different refs, three different acronyms. TVES, TEVES, TVes. I don't suppose we know just yet which one is "right", do we? ··coelacan 05:13, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *Ah, I don't know where the logo is? I don't see it in any of those sources. ··coelacan 05:19, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *You might be able to find it here:  or  (here it actually appears as TVes) Weatherguy1033 05:31, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *Ahh. Okay, I see it here as well. I'll redirect the other page to this one; "TVes" is correct. ··coelacan 05:37, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: name?

message: Could someone please write about TVes programs? to make a confrontation between TVes and RCTV
thank you Minako-Chan* 18:08, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  About TVes programing 

message: This article is clearly intended to be about a tv channel, not about the protests around it, though the political phenomena is very relevant. It should not be the tone of the article to focus on it, but rather on what the channel is itself. Someone reverted my edit accusing me of vandalism, yet I fail to see that. And my edit summay does refer to my edit: I moved the section about protests from the upper part of the article to the first section of it, naming it History of TVes. I hope it makes things clar and povoques no war, but discussion. Homo logos 01:48, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: removing quality relevant content b/c you dont like it or for whatever reason is vandalism. VANDALISM: DON'T DO IT!! - even my accidentT ALK•QRC2006•¢ʘñ†®¡ß§ 05:52, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

text: 'Penalty' is mispelled. Again, this is  talk page, not a forum. Thank you. Weatherguy1033 20:09, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

text: A role unsubstantiated in a court of law, on a matter where further investigations are discouraged by the government? A role that Venevisión was also supposedly guilty of (and Venevisión's license was renewed without a peep)? Talk about double standards!201.208.1.34 (talk) 04:36, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

text: POV is not arithmetic--ZayZayEM 11:44, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

text: This talk page is not a forum for discussion about the topic (see the header). Thank you. Weatherguy1033 20:08, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

text: The first part of your comment I agree with you on. Regarding the second half of your comment, it's good to hear from an eyewitness report but Wikipedia does not allow  original research. Thank you. Weatherguy1033 20:08, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  the article should not be about the protests
Talk:Samuel Colchin

message: The article was created in 2006 and needs inline citations. Sources do exist, including those in the list. BcJvs UTC 10:12, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm unconvinced - I have access to two which were in your list. Neither mention Samuel Colchin at all. It concerns me that we actually have little beyond scorecard information. Feel free to show me where there are in depth prose mentions of Colchin. Here or at Talk:BlackJack are fine. Blue Square Thing (talk) 22:02, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources
Talk:Ashoknagar Kalyangarh

message: After Dr. B.C.Roy Dreamed for the Ashomenagar Residential area,  Tarun Kanti Ghosh and Keshab Bhattacherjee along with Dr.Sadhan Sen and Nani Kar  were actively taken part to ease the life of people over their. Unfortunately  the names of Tarun Kanti Ghosh and Keshab Bhattacherjee have been omitted in the brief history of Ashokenagar . 
    Kindly arrange for amendmants accordingly.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.153.37.35 (talk) 07:50, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Hridaypur

message: Kolkata City indicates the total area covered by Kolkata Municipal Corporation & Kolkata Police simultaneously. Dum Dum, Salt Lake, New Town, Barasat  are in Kolkata Metropolitan Area/ Greater Kolkata only. Though they have pincodes of Kolkata, they have individual municipalities and police commissionerate also. Soumo Dutt 05:59, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kolkata
Talk:Bernardino Echeverría Ruiz

message: Link comes up as a 404.  Could someone fix that, or is this a fake cardinal? --Whsitchy 05:24, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:DAS Building bombing

message: It was a bus that was let go on a restricted access road to gonunder the building and explode. An old truck, by accident got in the way and that is why the bomb went off on the side of the building. 
Source: my mom.who survived the explosion and worked 1 office over maza marquez. Camoilla (talk) 00:12, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The truck was not parked by the building
Talk:Alles was zählt

message: there are multiple IP-Users like User:79.240.129.190 who really have great fantasies telling wrong stories here. Multiple characters here have been told to be death for various reasons, but all of this has not been true.
Everything written in the article in german speaking wikipedia (dewiki) is true and tells the real plots of the story. Please keep for sure to block vandal IP-Users who try to play games on other users in this article. Greatings from Germany from a daily watcher of the series.--Robberey1705 (talk) 01:18, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  IP-Users 

message: The fantasy of the IP User now has given strange fruits. He/she is pretending, the characters havent been on the show anymore, what is wrong, as they still are and still are alive. I am a daily watcher of the soap and know what I am talking about. For further information read on the dewiki/german wikipedia article, which clearly points out, this characters are still alive, havent been shoot or died from aids. Or watch some recent episodes of the series online on www.tvnow.de (or www.rtlnow.de). This nonsense has to stop.--Robberey1705 (talk) 23:36, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  IP-Vandalism 

message: ... wich got left: Diana was together with Brandon (played by Rhon Diels), Lena had an affair with Patrick (played by Jan Andres), Thomas had an one-night-stand with Brigitte (playing by Madlen Kaniuth), Julian Bayer leaves the show these days. Robberey1705 deleted these updates 'cause he/she is a "daily watcher of the soap" but knows nothing about it. xD
So, something more but the "only correct information given by the ip" has to be restore after Robberey1705 already restored more then the "only correct information given by the ip" - 'cause they were correct. Obviously Robberey1705 is either an inattentive "daily watcher of the soap" nor works sloppy. Or both. ^^ --84.148.24.25 (talk) 02:38, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  oh you funny guy. I know these facts and they are correct. I just don't have the time to restore everything. Please keep in mind, you provided incorrect information (Ingo in Deniz dead, albeight they are both still on the show, Joshua didn't take a pelting, etc. Leo still hasn't left for a "foreign country" and is still on, albeith it's just until next week). So please don't tell people what to do here. You are no serious user, and thats why you have to be blocked. If you are unable to work with and account, but with ever-changing-IPs, and provide incorrect information, you are wrong here.--Robberey1705 (talk) 11:29, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restore informations
Talk:Dum Dum

message: The following statement appears at the end of the entry.  I am sure that this is a false statement, and either way, it is incomprehensible.
"Dum Dum was perceived as an ancient god. He was responsible for the flying creatures amongst the trees of the masabusu. They all came under one name, ready, mellow, omniporous and sturdy. Dum Dum was very clever, he made sure to choose the dumbest of the dum dum therefore they believed in dum dum."
Thank you.
69.159.120.90 02:40, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Its Dumdum; not dum dum. --59.99.136.36 (talk) 07:41, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dum Dum entry 

message: I think the pictures are not quite good quality and to improve the quality of the article, some other information should be added.--Soumit Banerjee (talk) 09:37, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: About the improvement of the article

message: Hello fellow wikipedians, Dum Dum refers to the area covered by Dum Dum Municipality only (Check the given official website link). North Dum Dum & South Dum Dum are seperate municipalities & hence they should not be included within Dum Dum. Soumo Dutt 05:34, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Municipality
Talk:If I Ever Fall in Love

message: This article is wrong. "If I Ever Fall in Love" never went to Number One on the R & B charts. The highest it got was number 2 on December 5, 1992 where is sat for 8 weeks behind Whitney Houston's "I Will Always Love You."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.226.211.33 (talk) 12:42, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Nursing in Australia

message: G'day all.  Thought I had left a note here last night, but the post must've been interrupted.  Just wanted to let you know I have (as promised) started to remove the country-specific sections from Nurse, replacing them with links to external pages such as Nursing in Australia.  You already had all the information on this page anyway, but just in case you want to go back and look at the section in the Nurse article, here's the diff.
Let me know if I can do anything to help here, I worked in Sydney for four years.  Cheers, Basie (talk) 04:53, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed aussie information from [[Nurse]] 

message: As part of a review of all nursing wikiproject articles, I have changed this article's importance to mid per Wikipedia:WikiProject Nursing/Assessment#Importance scale.  I have also added start class. If you disagree, please leave a note here so we can discuss it.  Cheers, Basie (talk) 05:54, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Have substantially added to the page, believe it is no longer "start" class.Adamm (talk • contribs) 06:21, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:NURSE]] priority review

message: Does anyone object to a few lines on South Australia?
--Jones.liam (talk) 01:50, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: SA

message: Just wondering if anyone would be willing to write a few sentences on Nursing Assistants here in Australia? They're pretty important to some hospitals...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.175.222.248 (talk) 13:56, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Achieved.Adamm (talk • contribs) 06:21, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assistant in Nursing? 

message: I went through the article and supplied reliable references to everything that was marked "citation needed".  Have replaced some references with stonger sources. Also refashioned the introduction which was a bit of a mixed blessing. Some references supplied in good faith (I hasten to add!) have directions to firewalled sources which are of little use.  Happy to discuss Adamm (talk • contribs) 03:34, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits February 2023 

message: Overall, the article is comprehensive and well written. The following improvements are needed.
* Several citation needed (cn) tags indicate information that needs sources.
* The entire section History of nursing in Australia should be moved into a seperate article, and a "Main article" tag here in this article.
* The section History of nursing education can be condensed. See an example from "Nursing in Canada" article here how sub-sections help for easier reading.
"Rater" software (not always accurate) shows prediction of 94-percent for Class B or higher. With the above changes, a Class upgrade may be possible, at least Class C with the additional sources. BTW, one of my sibilings was an emergency room nurse for many years, so I do know details of some medical topics (United States). Regards, JoeNMLC (talk) 01:58, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article assessment
Talk:My Life Coach

message: Why is there links in this article that lead right back to this article?  Seems pretty redundant.
:Because as of right now, that's pretty much all we know about them. They may be their own articles in the future and I prepared for that inevitability by pre-registering the names beforehand. Drumpler 07:17, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: To me, this game looks pretty much like a prototype of My Weight Loss Coach. Rkiesler (talk) 23:56, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  My Weight Loss Coach ? 
Talk:UK Music Week

message: For some reason I cannot make the names on the lists appear as I entered them - in other words with "returns" at the end of the line.Gill P 06:00, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

message: To improve the style and layout of the article. Unfortunately, the original author has been blocked since 2007 so is not of any help. Could an editor have a look and help me to make the changes needed to be able to remove the template? Iamthemuffinman (talk) 14:22, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Working on the article
Talk:Enis Batur

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 06:09, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: The present bibliography is organized in ascending chronological order with no indication of the nature of the works. It would be more useful grouped by genre. More relevant would be a list of works in English-language translation. I found none in the U.S. Library of Congress online catalog, and Google Books lists a 2006 volume of selected poetry in English. This requires further elaboration for inclusion on the page. -- Deborahjay (talk) 20:08, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography 
Category talk:Science fiction comedy films

message: hi everyone, thank you to have created this catégory
european aned estern sci fi comedy comming ! where are the other continents ?--Beaucouplusneutre (talk) 20:56, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: they are culture specific  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beaucouplusneutre (talk • contribs) 21:06, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  i think there is a sense categorising them by country
Talk:List of number-one singles in Australia during the 1960s

message: I have removed all or a majority of the fair use images on this page as their use was not in line with our Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria policy (likely in that the use is not minimal (3.a.) and it is in a list or a gallery (8.)) or our Wikipedia:Non-free content guideline that states that cover images may only be used for critical commentary on the cover itself, not just identification. Please do not re-add them without discussion. Kotepho 09:01, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use image removal
Talk:Single scull

message: I have just updated this article.  My only question is whether it should just be included under rowing.--aquamari 06:32, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: To answer my own question, I looked at the FISA list of top rowers and noted that only one male and two female athletes had medalled in both sweep and scull.  I feel that it's not justified to claim that proficiency in the two disciplines is so closely correlated, so I'm going to take it out.  So there.  TrulyBlue (talk) 16:22, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: update

message: Someone has added a statement that "For the vast majority of rowers, sweep oar ability is very close to sculling proficiency."  I would dispute that, since most sweep rowers of my acquaintance have not had much experience in sculling and I would not class them as proficient.  Has anyone got a view on whether this statement is justified?  Even at international level, Redgrave's ability in the scull was seen as exceptional (though he wasn't up to world-beating standard in the scull), and few top scullers are seen in sweep boats, AFAIK. TrulyBlue (talk) 12:02, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: To answer my own question, I looked at the FISA list of top rowers and noted that only one male and two female athletes had medalled in both sweep and scull.  I feel that it's not justified to claim that proficiency in the two disciplines is so closely correlated, so I'm going to take it out.  So there.  TrulyBlue (talk) 16:22, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rowing and sculling skills equivalent? 

message: In addition to the usual photos of scullers, I suggest that we should display a good photo (or photos) of sculling boat(s) in this article.  jw (talk) 22:07, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:   Improve photo(s) 

message: Is the word skiff not used in English language for single sculling? 2600:1700:65A4:5610:A9D2:D3E2:3AFA:C55B (talk) 04:08, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Skiff
Talk:Clarice Beckett

message: thanks from WiRed Victuallers (talk) 22:33, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: thanks

message: It appears that Clarice's nationality really is Australian. If there is a dispute on this, please discuss here. - Chris.sherlock (talk) 12:44, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nationality 

message: Why is there a section on Australian tonalism and also a section Work and style? Unless anyone objects, and since Beckett practiced and extended tonalism and it is central to her work, not something separate, I'll go ahead and put the two together under Work and style, and retain the link to the main article on Aust. tonalism.  Jamesmcardle(talk) 05:18, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: For the same reason Monet has a Biography subsection titled "Impressionism", and another section on Method. Beckett's link to Meldrum and adoption of his tonalist system warrants its own subsection. Right now it's really a placeholder until the Life section expands further, then it can be split into more precise subsections. - HappyWaldo (talk) 05:54, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: That's appropriate - Monet is quintessentially an Impressionist, Beckett less easy to pigeonhole. Posthumous research and critical examination by Hollinrake, Borlase, McCaughey, Lock and McAuliffe, and Leason writing in her lifetime, place Beckett as more than a Tonalist; they classify her as a Modernist, with Tonalist training which she adapted, rather than merely 'adopted.' Hollinrake, Lock and others' discovery and investigation of her connection via Jorgensen and others to theosophy confirm that rather than practicing a 'scientific' transcription of the subject as did the Tonalists, her concern, beyond 'Method' was with transmitting a spiritual/psychological experience. An additional heading 'Modernist' would thus be appropriate. Jamesmcardle(talk) 22:07, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amalgamating sections 

message: Beckett is distinguished amongst Australian artists by the radical change in critical reaction to her work. During her lifetime it was generally denigrated, and there are multiple contemporaneous news and journal sources to be cited supporting that perception, but since, even quite early after her death in the case of George Bell, she began to be accepted as having achieved a unique approach, especially to colour in form, departing significantly from the Meldrum Tonalism. A section titled 'Critical reception,' 'Recognition' or the like devoted to that contrast in response could directly address that contrast. Do other editors agree? Jamesmcardle(talk) 06:34, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception
Talk:Associated Co-operative Creameries

message: Anyone know who formed ACC and where?  I would guess it was one of the consumer co-ops that later merged to form North Eastern Co-op, but I can't put a pure guess in the article! --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 14:22, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early history? 
Talk:Help Me Make It Through the Night

message: Lynn Anderson did this song also in 1973, I believe.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.152.126.7 (talk) 20:55, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

message: Bryan Ferry recorded the song in 1971? The first Roxy Music album had not even been recorded in 1971. Another Time, Another Place was released in 1974 and there is no way any material on it would have been recorded pre-1973, 1973 being the date of the earliest Bryan Ferry solo sessions. --S.Camus (talk) 10:48, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inept date 
Talk:Foy's Lake

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Theleftorium (talk) 21:51, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:National Forensic Association

message: The NFA page had a Dramatic Interpretation section.  Seeing that, I decided to add a section for LD Policy.  I think that we ought to think about giving each of these, as well as other NFA categories, their own pages.  Lists of previous champions or topics would be great to have.  Rules for each event and time alotments should also be given.  --Zoltan7 06:56, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Pecos Conference

message: The Pecos Conference is notable in the following ways:
There is a book published about the Pecos Conference by Richard B. Woodbury, a well known archaeologist: http://www.amazon.com/Sixty-Years-Southwestern-Archaeology-Conference/dp/0826314112/ref=sr_1_1/104-7704681-9201569?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1180412146&sr=8-1 http://www.swanet.org/2007_pecos_conference/misc_articles/1996_Downum.pdf
There also have been recent articles written about the Conference 2005 by Grace Lichtenstein (New York Times) http://www.swanet.org/2007_pecos_conference/misc_articles/2005_Lichtenstein.pdf 2006 by Teresa Mendez (Christian Science Monitor) http://www.swanet.org/2007_pecos_conference/misc_articles/2006_Mendez.pdf
The Pecos Conference is regularly mentioned in the professional journal American Antiquity in the context of current and on-going research, and mentioned in textbooks and popular magazines like Archeology and Antiquity.
Every archaeology student in the United States is taught the importance of the Pecos Conference and Wikipedia even runs a page titled Pecos Classification http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pecos_Classification. The Pecos Classification came about because of the work of archaeologists meeting at the Pecos Conference. The conference remains important and notable today because it is an activity that organizes each year several million dollars worth of research and sets the standards for collaborative research that are emulated by archaeologists around the world.
B.starbucks 04:37, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pecos Conference is notable
Talk:Co-operative College

message: Please go ahead with the proposed merge.  It would also be a good idea at that time to see if any of the text was lifted from a brochure or prospectus.  --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 18:02, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:WEFUNK Radio

message: there was a note on this article questioning its notability. i think the fact that this radio show comes with the itunes radio streams is enough of a reason to have a page about it. and from people ive talked to, its reasonably well known.
and its dope. if groove or static are reading this, keep rockin the ill grooves. you guys have put me on to alot of illness. peace Bigdan201 06:09, 15 November 2007 (UTC)