Talk:Star Trek Customizable Card Game

message: It is not clear how many players are supported in the game; though mention of '2 players games' are made repeatedly, it would be helpful to know how many people can play and how well e.g., MtG can be played with more than 2 players but it's not ideal.
It would be helpful in the list of expansions to mention the dates they were released. 
Brief mention is made that some cards are 'backwards compatible' but this concept isn't well explained.
--UniqueCrash5 18:30, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: This article needs to be edited by someone who has an expansive knowledge of the game.  There is no way for me, or anyone who is unfamiliar with the game, to provide a comprehensive edit.  I changed some things that were NPOV and tried to remove any language that sounded like it wasn't an encyclopedia article.  I will post a verify for it and put it in article clean up. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Plm209 (talk • contribs) 08:12, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll take a look at it here over the next week, see if I can't do it some justice.  (Played the game from shortly after release up until shortly before its demise and renaming as the First Edition, so I'll see what I can do) Kcbnac 18:18, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need Help 

message: The image :Image:TribblesGame.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here.  In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.  Please check
:* That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
:* That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --17:49, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image copyright problem with Image:TribblesGame.jpg

message: Please stop removing The Continuing Committee section from this article. TCC is working hard to support the game (with Decipher's blessing) and deserves to be mentioned, as the games are still being actively supported and the player base is growing. If you have a problem with TCC, please feel free to visit their forums and take it up with them. 24.210.193.191 (talk) 21:07, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I have nothing against TCC, and in fact think they're great. None of that changes the fact that they have no established notability on Wikipedia, and there are no citations from reliable sources supporting any of the claims in their section. If you wish to re-add the section, please do so with reliable citations establishing their notability. For example, a news posting on Decipher's page, telling fans about TCC and how they are now supporting the CCG, or a news article by a paper or online news site talking about TCC and what they are doing. MrMoustacheMM (talk) 23:27, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: But we're not talking about an entire article about The Continuing Committee here; just information on the current state of the game. The game itself is obviously a notable subject since it has it's own article. This section would just be additional, publicly known information about the game's state and where it stands now. It would be false to claim or imply the game is not being played or developing. 24.210.193.191 (talk) 19:11, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It doesn't matter that this is only a section. Even uncited, non-notable sections should be avoided on Wikipedia. I understand that you want people to know about the site, but unfortunately this information isn't appropriate in an encyclopedia without some sort of reference that establishes its notability. MrMoustacheMM (talk) 04:11, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Continuing Committee 

message: I don't see any evidence that this subgame is notable enough to warrant a stand-alone article, but the content is referenced and can be simply merged (copied) here. Thoughts? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:47, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 23:07, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from [[Tribbles (game)]] 

message: There were no less than three sentences that read along the lines of: "This expansion included two more beautiful women: Hoshi and Kira". As far as I was able to tell, the characters stated weren't the only female cards in those sets, nor were they the only foil cards, female or not. Removing just the cringey "beautiful" would have left the reader with the erroneous sense that these cards were worth pointing out, so I opted to remove the entire sentences.
While I don't disagree that the actresses were attractive, it read like a description from someone's 1990's fan webpage, undermining the validity of the rest of the descriptions. Should these cards for any reason bé necessary to include, please find a way to do so, without it sounding like a fan-fiction.87.209.236.59 (talk) 12:20, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  removed "beautiful women"