lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ways of Seeing

message: This article is written in part in the first-person. See Waldon 20:56, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the tag. If I have made a mistake by doing that, please let me know!--Susiebowers 19:42, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

message: I have did a little tidying on this (Михал Орела 17:08, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: I have no idea what, specifically, the class assignment was in regard to this article, but it's clear that the instructor who assigned it has been misled by the general tagline "The encyclopedia anyone can edit", and has very little idea of what, exactly, is an acceptable edit to this encyclopedia.  In this respect, he or she is doing a disservice to their students, because their edits have not been within Wikipedia policy, and have been reverted by a number of editors.The very most basic concerns are:
*Verifiability - any editor should be able to verify the information in the encyclopedia, and they need to be able to do this through
*Citations from reliable sources - we need to be able to go to a reliable source to verify the information, this precludes
*what is called here "original research", which means personal analysis or interpretation which is not supported by a reliable source.
It does nobody any good to simply tell one's students to "go edit Wikipedia", any more than it would do them any good to tell them to "go publish a paper in a peer-reviewed journal."  In both cases there are standards to be met, and requirements to fulfill, and it is the instructor's job to inform the students as to what those standards and requirements are. By allowing them to edit willy-nilly, the teacher oin this case has abrogated their responsibility, and needs to take upon themselves the task of bringing their students up to speed, since none of their edits will be accepted here if they don't meet Wikipedia's standards. I hope that's a clear explanation. Beyond My Ken (talk) 08:13, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Class assignment 

message: An I justified in saying that the entire article appears to be original research, and therefore should be disallowed ?  Not a single one of the assertions made is referred to previously published material. Correct me if I am wrong.  G4oep  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.96.58.212 (talk) 09:48, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original research ?
Talk:BASE Institute

message: The BASE Institute homepage lists only one person under "Who We Are". Does anyone know if this is just a one-man show? If so, that should probably be noted in the article.
:I don't know, honestly, but it wouldn't surprise me. If it really is just him, though, we probably should just merge this with his article and redirect to him, and put a section in his article about this "organization". Titanium Dragon 21:51, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: He describes himself as the President of BASE; however, his webpage has two seperate emails, info and webmaster, so I'm guessing that there are in fact at least two members to his organization; a webmaster and himself. It should be noted they have a P.O. Box rather than an actual street address, though, but that might just indicate they don't have a physical group residency and rather are a group of people who call themselves by that name. It should also be noted that their contacts page metions that their staff members are located around the world, and though that is very vague it does indicate there are multiple members. Of course, it could all just cover that he is a single individual, but that seems somewhat unlikey given the expense involved in some of these expeditions. Titanium Dragon 21:56, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Its basically a one man show selling self-published books surrounding religion, but there are some "staff." ---Cornukechecker 03:16, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  info and webmaster mean nothing--sending email for multiple addresses to one account is trivial.  Also, both of those names are more or less standard on the Internet. --64.232.164.68 23:38, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Base Institute Staff
Talk:KRIS-TV

message: Hello, Please do not add unreferenced names as entries to the list of former employees in articles. Including this type of material in articles does not abide by current consensus and its inclusion is strongly discouraged in our policies and guidelines. The rationales are as follows:
#WP:NOT tells us, Wikipedia is "not an indiscriminate collection of information."  As that section describes, just because something is true, doesn't necessarily mean the info belongs in Wikipedia.  
#As per WP:V, we cannot include information in Wikipedia that is not verifiable and sourced. 
# WP:Source list tells us that lists included within articles (including people's names) are subject to the same need for references as any other information in the article. 
#Per WP:BLP, we have to be especially careful about including un-sourced info about living persons.
If you look at articles about companies in general, you will not find mention of previous employees, except in those cases where the employee was particularly notable.  Even then, the information is not presented just as a list of names, but is incorporated into the text itself (for example, when a company's article talks about the policies a previous CEO had, or when they mention the discovery/invention of a former engineer/researcher). If a preexisting article is already in the encyclopedia for the person you want to add to a list, it's generally regarded as sufficient to support their inclusion in list material in another article. cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 21:49, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding unreferenced entries of former employees to lists containing BLP material 
Talk:Qaraqosh

message: Bakhdida is a different Al Hamdania than the village where Hashim Ibrahim Awad was killed by Marines (the so-called Hamdania incident).  The Al Hamdania where the killing took place is a small village of about 30 houses immediately west of Baghdad, near Abu Ghraib prison.  The location and name of the village initially caused some confusion. As the article explains, the name "Al Hamdaniya" is a common one in the region. I'm removing the incident from this article. technopilgrim 21:01, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Hamdania killing

message: Should include Arabic and/or Syriac alphabet versions of some of the key words... AnonMoos 12:50, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Original alphabets

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 12:56, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Bakhdida →  – Clear common name in reliable sources. Google Scholar for all the alternative names listed in the article:
*722 results for "Qaraqosh"
*253 for "Al-Hamdaniya"
*72 for "Bakhdida"
*39 for "Qara Qosh"
*24 for "Baghdeda"
NGRAMS results overwhelmingly favor Qaraqosh 
There's no other place or topic called Qaraqosh, which redirects to this article (t · c) buidhe 16:50, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 16 May 2021
Talk:Robert Nixon (prophet)

message: Details taken with permission from "It's All Over" by J. Brian Curzon, 2006.  However, it has been pointed out (thank you) that the details contained therein are in opposition to the dates of English Kings given in the article.  A websearch confirms that there are two competing dates for the lifetime or Robert Nixon. Older sources go for the older date but there seems to have been new prophecies added (with concomitant changing of dates) at times when, presumably, someone felt a new prophecy was needed.  IantheLibrarian 22:37, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

message: in extraordinary popular delusions and the madness of crowds there is a pretty big section on him. Would this be considered a valid source? 173.56.252.247 (talk) 03:49, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  madness of crowds
Talk:Grumpy Old Bookman

message: Oh dear, I don't seem to be doing so well, alas. It was not meant to be an ad at all! The Grumpy Old Bookman's litblog is well-known in the writing world and all I was trying to do was create a new article on WIKI. I have NO affiliation with GOB, or Michael Allen at all. GOB is mentioned quite a few times on the WIKI (lit) pages but there was no article, so I thought I'd make a page. 
Please tell me how I can improve the article and I will be more than happy to do so.
Sorry, I forgot to sign yesterday...
AndreaUKA 09:05, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have rewritten the short article according to "Wikipedia standards" without having had a look at the blog myself. I hope it's okay now. The only thing that remains to be done is to disambiguate Michael Allen, as that link only points to a disambiguation page. <KF> 10:25, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

message: I moved the article from the original (incorrect) title The Grumpy Old Bookman since there's no "the" in the title. Aristophanes68 (talk) 00:56, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  title was wrong
Talk:Briscola

message: What is the etymology of the English-language term? -Fsotrain09 21:10, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Etymology

message: I was under the belief that the term for the face card of the woman was called the lady, or the donna, rather than the Knave, or the fante. Can someone please clarify this for me?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.30.3.99 (talk) 05:40, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Face Cards (Knave/Jack vs. lady) 

message: An anonymous user reversed the order of ace and three, saying that the three ranks higher than the ace. That's possible, but all sources I could find say otherwise. If the anonymous user was right, we would need a source that gets it right. Or is it a regional variation? --Hans Adler (talk) 11:38, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I played Briscola all from Bologna through Rijeka to Split and we always used the aces before threes. Maybe he was really thinking of some local variation Kpreitsetljiann (talk) 14:11, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relative ranks of ace and three 

message: The article states that when three or six players are involved the cards with the number two are removed. Another, I believe more common, practice is to remove the fours, since the fours don't rank high in tresette(as opposed to the twos, which are the second highest card in tresette). Briscola and Tresette are commonly played together (tresette till 21, then briscola till 3 and finally Bella, wich is tresette till 41). So it is quite unpractical to remove once the twos when playing briscola and some other card when playing tresette. I speak from experience since I live in the northern mediteran and I learned to play those games from my grandfather. :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.143.211.221 (talk • contribs) 
:Thanks, that makes a lot of sense. I will correct it tomorrow. Since you know the game, can you comment on my question in the previous section? Hans Adler 00:49, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  FOURS REMOVED NOT TWOS 

message: Never heard of such rules, and I played briscola for years. Without a reference, I'm going to remove them in a few days. --Webwizard (talk) 01:13, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Deuce and seven
Talk:2000 World Rally Championship

message: Although I've no doubt his passport says "British", he puts the Scottish flag alongside his name on the window of his car; see here (Focus) and here (Xsara). I'd therefore say it's presumptious of us to change this (WP:OR?), hence my reversion. Cheers, DeLarge 21:12, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colin McRae's nationality
Talk:Gary Moeller

message: "A 'Detroit-Area' bar"??? Whoever wrote that didn't know the whole story. I'll be more specific. That incident is the first thing I remember about UM football, and I remember it well. I was 9 years old at the time. Ypsidan 03:18, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: How can you remember this incident well to be more specific?  At age nine and you weren't even there???  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Excaliburvocalist (talk • contribs) 20:51, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Drunken incident
Talk:HMS Bristol (D23)

message: I've dine some more research into the replacement of Bristol with Sir Galahad, and it looks like it could be a long way in the future/never happening (from talking to people working on the ship).  Therefore, I am going to remove the text about the ship being scrapped per Wikipedia is not a crystal ball.  If the claim was backed up by Verifiable sources, then it would be acceptable, but I'm afraid at this moment it is sheer speculation to say that Bristol will be replaced.  Also, the notices on the walkways warning that they should not be used were because on normal maintenance procedures - now that they've had a service the signs say "Not to be used after August 2008".  Note that most walkways of this type have a notice like that on them - so it is no indication of Bristol's future.  Thanks Martinp23 16:06, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replacement of Bristol 

message: Does anybody have a decent image of HMS Bristol to replace the one that is there are the moment? Whilst I am grateful to the contributor, it is a very grainy photo that does not do the ship much justice. Thanks Xtrememachineuk (talk) 13:28, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I might be able to get some, possibly... Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 18:15, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Image of HMS Bristol/Type 82

message: Type 82 destroyer should be merged into HMS Bristol (D23)
184.144.163.181 (talk) 07:08, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge Type 82 destroyer into HMS Bristol (D23)

message: "HMS Bristol was paid off in 1991 and refitted to again replace Kent...."  This is the only mention of (HMS?) Kent in the article -- where, when, and why did Bristol previously replace Kent? 71.235.184.247 (talk) 22:50, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The wording which you mention was inserted in  in 2010.  You will see the wording at the time refers to the previous occasion when Bristol replaced Kent. --David Biddulph (talk) 00:19, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kent
Talk:Cam Cameron

message: 4 years as head coach at Indiana U with a sub 500 record leads to offensive coordinator in the NFL? Huh.
Accomplishments include the development of Gus Frerotte? LOL! You gotta love the old boys network.
Please remember to (~ * 4) at the end of comments. Also, to be fair, the Indiana job is a wasteland where coaches have gone to die due to getting outrecruited by, well, everyone else in the area with a major college football program. His actual best accomplishments as a coach come more in the form of Antawan Randle-El and Adawale Ogunlaye in college and Drew Brees in the NFL. Wayman975 01:42, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree that star players are his accomplishments.  Unless those players credit him with their success, I suggest that the individual players should be credited with their own success.--Travelingman (talk) 03:28, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Surbahar

message: Is there difference between the Imdadkhani surbahars and the other gharanas as far as the instruments structure, similar to the Kharaj and Gandhar Pancham styles? From what I can see, the Imdadkhani instruments don't have an upper tumba whereas Kushal Das' instrument definitely had one. Is that universal? Other changes such as jawari?Rasputin98 (talk) 20:31, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Surbahar styles 

message: I don't have a lot of knowledge on this subject, but 20Hz seems really low, are we sure that it can go that low? I agree with the fellow above, we need a tuning chart.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.172.110.123 (talk) 01:51, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tuning 

message: I think a reference should be made for Annapurna Devi, when the subject of Surbahar comes up.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.60.81.9 (talk) 12:14, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Annapurna Devi 

message: Isn't the Hindi spelling of the instrument's name सुर बहार rather than सुर् बहार्? 173.89.236.187 (talk) 22:20, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Hindi spelling

message: Can it be added to the article why the inventors named this instrument "spring melody"? 173.89.236.187 (talk) 22:31, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of instrument 
Talk:Terry Hoeppner

message: Terry passed away last night following a long battle with brain cancer.  The thoughts and prayers of all Hoosier Nation are with Jane and the entire Hoeppner family. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.9.131.2 (talk • contribs) 
:I've heard this as well, but I'm waiting for a reliable source before I update the article.  A friend at the Alumni Association will let me know as soon as there's a press release.  -- Merope 13:07, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Updated with link to local newspaper article; will update later with more information.  -- Merope 13:28, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's hit all the wires --things were sounding bad from the earlier news reports, but this still comes as a shock and tragedy.  RIP. --Bobak 13:59, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Terry Hoeppner's passing
Talk:Kirk Ferentz

message: Can somebody find a better picture?  The one accompanying this article is really grainy and indistinct. ObtuseAngle 20:25, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: He has Hungarian ancestry - Ferenc is a Hungarian name for Frank and a family name in Hungary.178.48.177.1 (talk) 10:08, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ferentz = Ferenc 

message: Thinking about adding more sections to his biography. "Background" is too broad and encompasses his playing career, early coaching career, first head coaching role in college, and his NFL career. There should probably also be sections for his Iowa career, which has a couple pretty clear eras. There could also be other sections, including scandals or offensive linemen coached.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gegenpresser (talk • contribs) 03:56, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reorganization
Talk:Veronica sect. Hebe

message: The article states that Hebes attract butterflies. I have a couple of plants in flower at the moment. No butterflies, but plenty of bees! Alan Pascoe 21:35, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hebes attract butterflies? 

message: I'm aware that some editors of pages such as these don't like external links. I think though there is a good case for having the Hebe Society. Alan Pascoe 21:41, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  External link
Talk:Wayne Fontes

message: Coach Fontes needs to be x-refd under "Portuguese-Americans"...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.114.58.46 (talk) 17:31, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Someone keeps whitewashing Fontes' arrest. The incident is cited. 
Vytal (talk) 03:32, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arrest 

message: The speculative coaching comments in the intro paragraph really need a citation or just to be deleted.Oneliketadow (talk) 06:00, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speculation 

message: Why is his year by year record not there? Awful  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.44.49.117 (talk) 03:02, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Head coaching record 

message: This article lacks neutrality. It reads like it was written by a PR firm.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:BB60:46A0:A90C:9F57:C75C:18D (talk) 12:55, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biased
Talk:Bede Griffiths

message: When I removed the Integral Thought category, it was readded with the comment: "Griffiths writings constitute integral thought."
I don't believe that this is true, and would like to see a source that says so, in the article or on the talkpage. --Bondego 19:00, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Apologies for the blunt statement in the summary and having no mention of integral thought in the article. I should have said, some of Griffiths writings express integral thought. I will add a reference to an interview of Griffiths which makes his position more clear. --Blainster 21:47, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Integral Thought? 

message: I don't think the University of Cambridge granted degrees in journalism in 1929. 
InfraredEyes (talk) 00:45, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Journalism? 

message: He said that the building of the car works at Cowley totally shattered his vision of Oxford as the medieval city of scholarship, and he never got over this. Valetude (talk) 03:13, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cowley 
Talk:Naruto Collectible Card Game

message: This article should really be focused more around the history and key points of the game, not just another place for the card list. 24.178.73.84 21:38, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Focus

message: I suggest someone scans the front and back of a basic card, and to add an "Anatomy of a Naruto CCG Card" section. Also talk about the Supply/Demand issue with this card game. Timekeeper 01:29, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Images

message: I'm curious to how 'Strategy Depth' is gauged exactly. Though Naruto is listed as 'high' I wouldn't mark it as that. The tag says it was discussed within the Magic talk page, but throughout the pages and their archives I couldn't find any consensus. Indeed, I wouldn't even consider Magic as high strategy! Exactly how are we gauging here? Chronomaster 15:13, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gauging 'Strategy Depth' 

message: The sentence from the article (as follows) is an unclear fragment. I can not figure out what it is referring to: "Cannot be found in blisters or non-blisters." Please make this a complete sentence. Also, there are other syntax errors throughout the article (like missing spaces, misspelled words, etc). Please correct these.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mathman1550 (talk • contribs) 22:19, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Unclear sentence
Talk:Johnny Majors

message: This reads as an Alabama press release might read. That's unprofessional. 127W111 (talk) 22:41, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tone 

message: Bowl record according to chart at bottom is 9-7, not 9-6 which shows in summary at top right.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.106.76.187 (talk) 01:43, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bowl record?
Talk:Frijj

message: Before any over zealous reverter turns up please for once actually look at the reason of the change. The product's name is offically spelt FRijj look here at Dairy Crest's website where they list all their products . Notice that it is spelt FRijj!
Thank you for your time TheEnlightened 21:41, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Product Name

message: I literally just had a FRijj milkshake that was mint chocolate flavour, and no the official website doesnt contain it so i have no picture or information. Just to let people know :) Fethroesforia 17:09, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: New flavour?

message: Someone replaced the standard flavours wit "poo", "piss", etc. So I reverted. Will need to keep and eye out for vandalism.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.134.213.230 (talk) 12:58, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandal edits 

message: As to make information correct, I have changed this page's name to Frijj as it is officialy spelt this way.
--82.34.173.149 (talk) 19:04, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirected to Frijj

message: I think the picture of the Cookie Dough Frijj bottle featured on this page is disgusting because you can see where he's been drinking it at the bottom of the lid! There should be a picture of a sealed, new bottle.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.34.173.149 (talk) 18:20, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disgusting Picture 

message: Guys what about the "Caramel Latte" flavour, put it in the table I don't know how!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.219.121.14 (talk) 13:54, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incomplete Table 