lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Geheimrat

message: deleted: 
In modern times, Geheimrat has returned as an honorary title ('Herr Geheimrat') conferred upon exceptional scientists. It is mentioned by Norbert Weiner in his book, Ex-Prodigy. It is similar to the knighting or conferring of 'Sir' by the head of the monarchy in England.
certainly untrue. I have never heard anybody of this or the prevous century being called Geheimrat. The Austrians have a habit of calling certain people, e.g. the president or chancellor of a university "Hofrat", meaning "Court Councillor". But that's all what's left of the manycolourful titles of the k.u.k. monarchy.
Simon A. 14:31, 7 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, Simon, but the fact that you have never heard of something doesn't mean it doesn't exist.  Felix Klein certainly did bear the title of Geheimrat during the 20th century.  I think David Hilbert did too. Michael Hardy 00:09, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

text: I have the book, Ex-Prodigy (or I am a Mathematician).  I don't remember the exact phrase but in the portion where Norbert Weiner was asking if the 'Professor' was at home , the governess was offended because the professor was suppossed to be addressed as Herr Geheimrat which was more prestigious than an ordinary  professor.  I'm not a native of Germany so go ahead and  list on Vfd if the article is not Wikipedia material.--Jondel 14:47, 7 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text:  Well, I justed glanced through the biography part in the Norbert Wiener article, and it seems that he was in Germany for a longer time only in 1914, which was still imperial times, of course. So, maybe, the professor, he was visiting, also had a political office. Simon A. 15:32, 7 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text:  The professor whom Norbert Wiener was visiting was Felix Klein. Michael Hardy (talk) 16:04, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Abandonment of the title, timeline

message: Does geheim really mean trusted? I have not been able to find any confirmation of this. It certainly means secret, and as far as I have been able to discover, nothing else. --Klausok (talk) 04:58, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps it should be translated as "confidential." NRPanikker (talk) 20:02, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trusted
Talk:The Jerry Springer Show

message: is there a wiki just for this show?Killemall22 (talk) 06:23, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  show wiki 

message: It currently says (3,600+ (as of August 26, 2009)). This is an old number. Those more familiar with the show, should know by now an updated number at least as of January 4, 2012 (giving a 2 month-difference from the current date) if not more recent figures than that. Stopde (talk) 16:22, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Is it possible that someone could create a supplementary page of all the episodes and a description of the guests on each show? It would be a lengthy process, but many tv shows have hundreds of episodes and a description of each listed on their wiki pages. Stopde (talk) 02:37, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed. That's probably one of the main things people come here looking for. It's the only reason I did. :-)   — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  03:21, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of episodes 

message: Can we semi-protect this page becuase this page has been vandalized by various unregistered users? It would help prevent people from claiming the show is scripted without putting a source. Jackthewriterguy12 (talk) 19:59, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protect this page
Talk:Sacrilege

message: According to my dictionary, blasphemy and sacrilege aren't quite the same thing.  Blasphemy targets specific sacred entities, namely deities. Sacrilege, on the other hand, can apply to anything sacred, including objects, places, and relationships. Thus (for example) urinating on a tombstone is sacrilege, but not blasphemy. I might remove the redirect and start an article in the future (unless you'd rather do it yourself :-)), but for now I'm leaving this as a redirect to blasphemy.Benc 00:47, Jul 23, 2004 (UTC)
: This splittng hairs is really the work of the devil!  Maybe the easiest thing to do would be to put a note on the blasphemy page about the difference?  If your heart and soul is really into it, you could check the "what links here" page on the blasphemy and sacrilege pages to see if links point to the right place. --1pezguy 01:04, Jul 23, 2004 (UTC)
See also:
http://www.tiscali.co.uk/reference/dictionaries/english/data/d0082744.html
"Spelling: remember -ile-, not -eli-. The word is related to sacrilege, not religious."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.23.202.96 (talk) 17:19, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: I removed the word "opprobrium" from this article.  It was unnecessarily obscure and not used properly anyway.  Let's try not to make articles unclear (or inaccurate) for the sake of showing off our vocabulary.76.75.113.132 (talk) 02:28, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opprobrium 

message: what is considered particularly sacrilegious in different religions ?
eg: hindus are a no on the cows meat,
islam says no pork,
jews dont do lamb,
the 10 commandments etc.
bohrgnosis  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.226.165.108 (talk) 16:27, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wants more info, wants someone else to compile it for me 

message: I've removed this reference. Surely it's impractical to list all known pop culture usages of a word? The list would be endless.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.189.12.46 (talk) 15:40, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Michael Jackson's Bad poster 

message: What? :
 The basic idea is that sacred objects are not to be treated in the same way as other objects because they help us remember hence and we recall. The sycophant, i.e. the use of vulgarity or flattery, is to not recall and thus is harmful to ourselves.
Zezen (talk) 07:29, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weird grammar
Talk:Picton, New Zealand

message: I added the "New Zealand" because there's a Picton in Prince Edward County, Quinte's Isle, Ontario. Someone can do the "dab"!  Robin Patterson 01:26, 23 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have added the line "His connection to the slave trade and controversial governorship of Trinidad has resulted in calls for places named after him to be renamed." to reflect a more balanced view of this man and his deeds. The.Wiki.Enthusiast (talk) 10:25, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Hero -  Sir Thomas Picton (a more balanced view beyond a positive spin for a new colony)
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television/Episode coverage task force

message: Is this the right place to ask: "Why isn't there a list of 60 Minutes episodes?
--CmdrDan (talk) 23:49, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where do I ask: Why isn't there a list of [[60_Minutes|60 Minutes]]

message: Does anyone have any thoughts about the categorization of episode redirects in both a "Foo episodes" category and its "Foo episode redirects to lists" category? :Category:Scrubs (TV series) episodes (subcategorized by season even) and :Category:New Girl episodes seem to do that and I don't see many others that do. I figure a lot of this is just from the time 15 or so years ago when editors were trying to make articles for every episode of shows back then, and now they're all redirects. Thanks. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 23:16, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categorizing redirects of episodes 

message: There is a proposal to change the naming conventions of TV season articles from the current practice of XXX (season 1) to XXX, season 1 or XXX season 1. As such a change would affect a substantial number of articles, you are invited to participate in the discussion at . Thank you. InfiniteNexus (talk) 04:20, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Update: Please see . Thanks. InfiniteNexus (talk) 23:18, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal regarding season article naming 

message: Adam Bernstein has directed several tv episodes. And he directed about 22 tv episodes that have their own wikipedia pages. Such as several episodes of Breaking Bad, Better Call Saul, 30 Rock, Scrubs, etc. If a category like "Television episodes directed by David Chase" (which only has 2 entries) can exist, why not one for Adam Bernstein?
Heres The List:
1. Scrubs: My First Day (2001)
2. Scrubs: My Life In Four Cameras (2005)
3. 30 Rock: Pilot (2006)
4. 30 Rock: The Aftermath (2006)
5. 30 Rock: Blind Date (2006)
6. 30 Rock: Tracy Does Conan (2006)
7. 30 Rock: The C Word (2007)
8. Breaking Bad: Cat’s In The Bag… (2008)
9. Breaking Bad: …And The Bag’s In The River (2008)
10. Breaking Bad: Mandala (2009)
11. Breaking Bad: ABQ (2009)
12. Breaking Bad: Caballo sin Nombre (2010)
13. Breaking Bad: Half Measures (2010)
14. Breaking Bad: Box Cutter (2011)
15. Breaking Bad: Hazard Pay (2012)
16. Smash: Understudy (2012)
17. Fargo: The Crocodile's Dilemma (2014)
18. Fargo: The Rooster Prince (2014)
19. Better Call Saul: Five-O (2015)
20. Better Call Saul: Gloves Off (2016)
21. Better Call Saul: Slip (2017)
22. Better Call Saul: Winner (2018) MrCboY1997 (talk) 23:19, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Create Category "Television episodes directed by Adam Bernstein".
Talk:Pedophile movement/Archive 2

message: [N.B. -- The history of this page is truncated. If anyone knows how that could happen or if it can be restored, I would appreciate a message.] Herostratus 13:10, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

message: Links that relate to abuse recovery and the sexual victimisation of children do not belong on this page. Pedophilia by itself does not imply any action on the sexual attraction at all. Whether it is a paraphilia or not, pedophilia is not an action in and of itself; therefore it does not have any victims. I am removing once again the links that are already appropriately placed on the child sexual abuse page. Zanthalon 23:33, 11 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: The links do not only relate to abuse recovery and sexual victimisation of children. Just read. One focusses on helping pedophiles to deal with their paraphilia, so this is exactly the right article to have it. Also note that many who were once "loved" by a "childlover" have severe problems with that experience later, so the other link is equally appropriate. Get-back-world-respect 23:41, 11 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Difference Between Pedophilia and Child Sexual Abuse 

message: Both the links in question and the behaviour of Get-back-world-respect have been submitted to Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment. If you wish to comment on this issue, please do so here: Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Get-back-world-respect. --Zanthalon 14:44, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Requests for Comment

message: These two paragraphs are flawed. However I can not fix easily them.
:The term boylover is taken as a contrast with the terms pedophile or child molester. Many boylovers consider pedophile to be the more general term; that is, all boylovers are pedophiles, but not all pedophiles are boylovers. This is because pedophile would also include girllovers and child molesters, whereas boylovers differentiate themselves from the former and distance themselves from the latter.
:A boylover is not a child molester. To assume that all boylovers are child molesters is equally fallacious as to assume that all heterosexuals are rapists. The fact that one expresses a sexual preference does not mean that that person is willing to break the law or harm others merely to achieve sexual gratification. Boylovers condemn child molesters and rapists of children as vehemently as any other sector of the population.
They try to make two many distinctions at once (boylover <-> girllover, pedophiles and child abusers overlap). The term child molester is not used in the common way, but to refer only to those persons, who have sexual contacts to children in a way, that child lovers consider unacceptable. This should be made clear in the article. --Moon light shadow 19:30, 8 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  boylover, pedophile, child molester
Talk:Bunghole

message: beautiful job whoever did the dante's inferno stuff. so awesome.  Kzzl
----
Does this still need Cleanup? If not, please remove it from WP:LO? JesseW 23:59, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops! After reading the actual Dante text, I realized that his use of bung was identical to the slang use of bunghole, so I restored the citation. To make this clear, I added the specific quote. I also restructured the subsequent text to provide a chronological flow of the slang citations, ending with the Beavis and Butt-head use. — Jeff Q 02:19, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)

message: This article has had a references tag for over two years despite (1) a reference being as easy to come by as a glance at the nearest dictionary (2) people adding quotations from both Hamlet and Dante's Inferno and presumably consulting referenced texts while adding them. Surely it can't be that difficult to come up with references. If no one has done it seven days from now I'll spend the 30 seconds it'll take to do it myself. DQweny (talk) 02:48, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: References tag
Talk:Mobile Bay jubilee

message: There was a cleanup tag but no suggestions here, so I removed it.  Mauvila 00:25, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup?
Talk:Józef Cyrankiewicz

message: Following was moved here. My problem is that Cyrankiewicz was set as Prime Minister, but I believe he was not much acting so. Being Prime Minister for so long period, doesn't mean that he was engaged personally in everything happenned at that period of time. I think that we need more personal analysys, what he personally achieved. Cautious 12:03, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved

message: There is an RfC on the question of using "Religion: None" vs. "Religion: None (atheist)" in the infobox on this and other similar pages. 
The RfC is at Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion. 
Please help us determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 19:39, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion|Request for Comments]] 
Talk:Battle of Méribel

message: Can you give more information because as it is now should be simply removed.
It does need a little background so that people who are not French history experts will have a clue what is happening. Wikiacc 00:42, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Dis donc! especially since Google.com lists zéro hits for "battle of Meribel"  This is a ski community. September is a slow month in Méribel, hein? --Wetman 00:58, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)

message: Reasons why we should consider removing this article. (1) The newly-updated Battle of Epierre (15 Sept 1793) article covers the battle and the 14 August to 8 October 1793 campaign in the Tarentaise and Maurienne valleys. The campaign has been thoroughly covered in the Battle of Epierre article. (2) Meribel is in a dead-end valley south of the Tarentaise, so it's not clear why it would be fought over. (3) The Duke of Montferrat's Piedmontese forces were farther west on 13 September - between Albertville and Moûtiers. (4) No sources are cited or referenced. Djmaschek (talk) 13:08, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Remove article?
Talk:Nick Cave

message: Nick Cave's eldest son was Jethro Lazenbury, who was born 10 days before Luke according to an article in The Guardian announcing his death:
https://www.theguardian.com/music/2022/may/09/jethro-lazenby-son-of-nick-cave-dies-aged-31
I edited the article to make this change but it was reverted. Maybe somebody else can follow up on it. Thanks. 192.252.235.92 (talk) 11:42, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nick Cave's sons
Talk:Bassas da India

message: Is this country an independent state?  Does it have any population?  64.26.170.157 07:49, 23 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Added to Madagascar, removed form Judaism. Not sure about France? Rich Farmbrough, 15:06, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Hm, is it  French  territory claimed by Madagascar? Rich Farmbrough, 15:16, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Projects

message: The intro describes the island's exclusive economic zone overlapping that of Europa Island. But the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea is pretty clear that this type of island wouldn't qualify for an exclusive economic zone. Writing that directly in the article would be original research, and against the guidelines of Wikipedia, but it does suggest that the claim about the exclusive economic zone needs to be sourced or possibly removed. If reliable sources say that France does claim an EEZ there, it should probably make clear that it's a questionable claim. GeoEvan (talk) 22:18, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Exclusive Economic Zone
Talk:Dialectic

message: Dialogue goes back to logos, and dialectic goes back to lexis, thus it means "through words", whereas dialogue means "through notions". In other words, in a dialogue you exchange different points of view, in order to reconcile the different aspects or relations (in a strict mathematical sense) captured, whereas in a dialectic as described by Plato in detail in "The Sophist" and "The Statesman" you analyze the relations of words to each other, like describing different special cases of a more general notion, like when you say: a "car" is either used for personal transport or for the transport of goods. In the latter case it is called a "truck". In the former case, if it is used to carry people that enter at designiated points, it is called a "bus", otherwise, if it used as a carrier service, it is called it "taxi" and if not... (Yeah, well, this is not entirely correct, but before I come to sedan etc. I just stop here, because you should already understand what we're talking about, and this kind of thing is precisely what Plato does in Sophistes and Politikos.
46.131.28.194 (talk) 09:10, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology & Plato
Talk:Sympson the Joiner

message: Renamed from Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Sympson:
Re: Sympson, now Sympson the Joiner; refs: Samuel Pepys, Pepys Library 
I tried to find backing for this on google, came up with around 100 hits, again, mostly the mirrors and genalogical stuff you would expect. Not sure if this is noteable, if the guy is only mentioned in 1 peron's diary, and we only know of one work he has built. Lyellin 08:42, Jul 23, 2004 (UTC)
* I'd send this to cleanup to await attention from furniture historians. As is it only says that the guy apparently existed. This is probably something not easily researchable in google and co. Ianb 09:00, 23 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  VfD Discussion
Talk:Electro stimulation

message: An article already exists for this topic "erotic electrostimulation".
----
On 30 July 2004, this page was nominated for deletion.  As a result of the discussion, it was kept but converted to a disambiguation page.  See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Electro stimulation for a record of the discussion.  Rossami 22:25, 11 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Spandex fetishism

message: This image seems appropriate to cosplay (where a very similar image already appears), but does not seem to be appropriate for this article. Can we have an image which depicts spandex fetishism as distinct from cosplay, please? -- Karada 11:47, 23 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed from this page

message: Could someone please assess the following material that could be merged into this article?  It has come from nylon fetishism, which has been through vfd and consensus is to merge and redirect it, with no agreement as to where. -- Graham  ☺ | Talk 17:51, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Guy1890 (talk) 23:46, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Material to be merged 

message: *Stocking fetishism
*Pantyhose fetishism
*Sexual fetishism
::Done. Guy1890 (talk) 23:46, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: See also

message: The spandex tights that the male in the picture is wearing are obviously lavender, they are not gray. Keraunos 15:05, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Tights male is wearing in picture are lavender, not gray

message: Should this article be merged to this list? It's pretty much a stub and not very notable.--HoneymaneHeghlu meH QaQ jajvam 20:42, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge to [[List of fetishes]]? 

message: Is the Sportacus link on this page intended to exist? it sounds like a joke! lol -201.228.205.76 (talk) 21:34, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weird Link 

message: Leggings does not match the fetishism because leggings are only a type of skin-tight clothing covering the legs. Above in that article does not say anything, does not say any thing. For that reason, Leggings has nothing to do with fetishism. Then, Leggings should not be included in this article. 190.137.36.40 (talk) 10:02, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Just a quick observation as I'm busy right now, but the whole point of "See also" is to highlight similar areas of interest that are not mentioned in the article.  Ergo your insistence that Leggings not being in the article merely strengthens the argument to include it in "See also".  Chaheel Riens (talk) 11:03, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: This IP user has a current ANI report located at Wikipedia:ANI#190.137.36.40. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 04:26, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  False contents and false links 

message: There's no source in this page. Is this kind of a page necessary? LeticiaLL (talk) 19:40, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  No sources..
Talk:Galleria Borghese

message: Following an image request on Wikipedia:Requested pictures I have found a suitable picture here. I have sent a request for permission to use the image to the photographer according to his Terms of use. Let's wait and see. -- Chris 73 | Talk 11:53, 23 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I have received a "noncommercial license provided..." from the copyright holder as mentioned above and described on :Image:Galleria Borghese by Mike Reed.jpg, and uploaded the image. -- Chris 73 | Talk 09:52, 24 Jul 2004 (UTC)

text: Pay no attention. The above user is babbling. Wetman 13:50, 24 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Glide ratio

message: Actually a hang glider has a glide ratio of about 15, with even 17 for a rigid hang glider.
Open-class sailplanes such as a Nimbus 4 or ASH25 probably have glide-ratios of approximately 60:1 but such small angles are difficult to measure
VASI links here, redirected from "glide slope".  Somebody should fix either the redirect or this page to talk about what glide slope means in approach procedures.
Glide slopes ARE different from this issue and should not be redirected here.  The correct info for a Cessna 150 (about 8.8:1) is available from its POH (Pilot's Operating Handbook, a relatively new term in FAA parlance).  You'd measure a 60:1 glide angle by, say, a release in still air at 100 feet AGL or so, and seeing if you'd go a nautical mile, over flat terrain.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tszekely (talk • contribs) 21:15, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early talk
Talk:Mariawald Abbey

message: *[As of 206 the abbey operated] under abbot Bruno Gooskens. 
Please do not return this information to the article without a citation.--BirgitteSB 20:06, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  contested statement removed 