Talk:Dissolution of the union between Norway and Sweden

message: Norway in 1905 isn't a very good name: the article is only about one set of events (unlike, for example, 1905). How about Norwegian independence 1905? I know it's tricky because of how Scandinavian politics worked before WWII, but I think we can do better than this. --Taejo 18:11, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that the title Norway in 1905 wasn't particularly descriptive of the subject matter, having reached the page only through a fairly convoluted set of links while hunting to see if the topic was covered.  Since no one's commented in the six weeks since Taejo's inquiry, I renamed the page to Separation of Norway from Sweden in 1905 — I think the new name will be more easily found in searches. -- JonRoma 18:14, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe an even better title would be 'Dissolution of the Swedish-Norwegian Union' (see e.g. Union Dissolution Day), but I'm not gonna make a big deal of it. Eixo 21:14, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: How about the title of this page as "Norway-Sweden Dissolution" because it wasn't really Norwegian independence from Sweden. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.213.213.9 (talk) 23:12, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Independence of Norway from Sweden in 1905 is the wrong name for this article. In everyday conversation it might be OK to juggle terms around a bit, but not here. Norway was not dependent on Sweden. Norway and Sweden were to separate countries in a personal union. A great deal of stress was put on the equality of the union from both sides early on. The king of Sweden was not the King of Norway, the same person was king of both countries separately. In addition to this the only thing in common was foreign policy. Again it is popular to say that Norway's foreign policy was in the hands of Sweden. Informally it is true that Swedes dominated in the foreign service. But formally it was a joint foreign service serving two countries. Norway did not celebrate 100 years as an independent country in 2005, it marked the centenial of the dissolution of the union with Sweden. Inge 15:11, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Norway in 1905"

message: Pages in category "Norwegian people of 1905".  Should they be merged t a section on this page?  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:59, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  People in category "Norwegian people of 1905" 

message: "Swedish King Oscar II's disappointment with Norway had reached critical mass - calling for the excommunication of Norway and the later celebration of 12 May throughout Sweden."
Maybe this makes sense in some other language,  but in english,  it is nonsensical.   "disappointment...  reached critical mass",  is an absurd metaphor.  And what does "the excommunication of Norway" mean ?   Kicking them all out of the Lutheran Church ?   Or what ?
It seems hardly plausible that the King was actually keen to expell half of his kingdom.  And doubtful that his Swedish Government would have, either.
I'm going to go ahead and remove this material, as it is nonsensical and lacks a citation. Also, please sign talk page posts using four tildes. Mgs2804 (talk) 17:48, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nonsensical statement 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Dissolution of the union between Norway and Sweden. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150505113934/http://www.arkivverket.no/manedens/aug2005/kvinneaksjon.html to http://www.arkivverket.no/manedens/aug2005/kvinneaksjon.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:15, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified