lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Josephine the Singer, or the Mouse Folk

message: Why is there no mention at all that this is an allegory about the church? Surely it's quite obvious?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.112.55.128 (talk) 21:43, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: allegory

message: What was so "misguided" about the plot summary that it had to be replaced with a one that is much shorter? Sofeil 06:57, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot summary

message: :Add  * Support  or  * Oppose  on a new line followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.
* Support. Every I look the title of this story is "Josephine the Singer, or the Mouse Folk". "The Mouse Folk" part is not an alternative title. --Sofeil 12:26, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: 03:47, 20 June 2007 24.193.214.75 (Talk) (2,721 bytes) (all this crap about "the mouse people" etc. pisses on Kafka's incomprehensible legacy..."das volk den mousen" means "the people of mice," it does not mean the "volk" are mice literally)
A plot summary should be factual, if you are dissatisfied with their portrayal as mice, you may remove those particular references. 
Interpretations of what the story means should appear under analysis, and properly cited; no matter how strongly you believe it, someone else  might have an equally valid interpretation.
If you have anything to say about the article or specific issues to raise, this talk page is the place for it, and please try to keep it civil. AshcroftIleum 12:56, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Response to 24.193.214.75
Talk:List of Pokémon manga

message: nu ami prea plac pokemonii  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.50.7.166 (talk) 19:45, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  pokemon  

message: The original tagger doesn't appear to have left a reason for wanting cleanup, but this article doesn't appear to cite significant coverage that would make it meet the notability guidelines. I'm new at editing but I think that means someone should add references and a mention of why the topic is significant, instead of just the short intro and list of releases that are there now, or the article should be proposed for deletion. Am I missing something? Hastyreader (talk) 18:46, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup April 2007 

message: I think this article really needs to be extended with the Japanese Pokémon mangas published by Shōgakukan. Here's two lists of Japanese Pokémon mangas: 1 & 2 213.250.75.114 (talk) 14:50, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japanese Pokémon mangas
Talk:NSYNC discography

message: why isn't this on here? what is the info for it?
Bouncehoper 16:28, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: merry christmas, happy holidays

message: Where is  "Bring It All To Me" by Blaque feat. NSYNC? (1999) and  "As If" (feat. *NSYNC) (Remix) (2000) — Preceding unsigned comment added by LovingKyoto (talk • contribs) 03:52, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: NSYNC as featuring artist for Blaque

message: I split off the Alabama version of this song as it was a separate release and charted separately from the solo 'N Sync version. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 19:32, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  God Must have Spent a Little More Time on You 
Template talk:Rfd top

message: This page needs  for helpful reasons. What do you think?--Gh87 07:00, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If you are suggesting a similar help box, I don't think it's really necessary as it's described at Wikipedia:Deletion process and anyone closing delete debates should be familiar with that page or shouldn't be doing it. However, it doesn't hurt anything so I don't object. If you are suggesting adding that particular notice, then that would be incorrect as it's instructions are wrong for this template. -- JLaTondre 14:21, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Adding content

message: I haven't seen any true debates in AfD, RfD, CfD, TfD, or MfD, but I've seen many discussions. It seems more appropriate to modify the top boilerplate to say "The result of the discussion is" instead of the current wording. 147.70.242.40 (talk) 20:43, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: -Unpopular Opinion (talk · contribs) 13:18, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are the XfDs debates or discussions? 

message: In a sandbox I've created a version of this template that only shows outcome of the discussion on pages where the discussions are transcluded, including WP:RFD. The actual discussion is at WT:RFD#Hide closed discussions from transcluded pages. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 09:43, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hide closed discussion from log
Talk:Boeing C-97 Stratofreighter

message: There were actually quite a few more c-97's converted to ELINT planes out of Wiesbaden, Germany and I flew on everyone of them.  8 were converted in various configurations, one with the biggest airborne camera ever made, two belonged to the CIA, 2 had a crew of 30 or so Intel officers on board, and a few others that came and went as mofified by General Dynamics in Forth Worth, TX.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.42.236.4 (talk) 06:16, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  EC97  

message: HC-97G(?) airdropped USAF Pararescue Jumpers (PJs) with parascuba gear at the end of the 1965 James Bond movie, "Thunderball"--yet Wiki article claims you couldn't airdrop from its rear?
https://impdb.org/index.php?title=Thunderball  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.190.165.112 (talk) 07:02, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The term "airdrop" relates to throwing cargo out the back not parachutists. MilborneOne (talk) 18:08, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  USAF Pararescue water parachute jump in 1965 James Bond movie, "Thunderball"
Talk:Pine Mountain Observatory

message: FYI, Pine Mountain was the first place on Earth to know that Apollo 13 had suffered an explosion in space. This is because the spacecraft was under direct optical observation at the time of the explosion. Correct interpretation of the observation was possible (i.e. that it was a substantial explosion) because the observation was part of an ongoing Pine Mountain study of man-made aerosols in space. Regretfully the videotape of the Apollo 13 event has been lost do to improper handling (under contract) by Portland State University. Note: this is my recollection from first hand conversation with the principle investigator for this work. Some excerpts of available material appear here: http://c2.com/optic/ -- WardCunningham 17:43, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: FYI
Talk:Igor Britanov

message: I have corrected a word in the article. Valery Pshenichny was the Security Officer of K-219..not the Political Officer (Zampolyt). The Political Officer was Yuri Sergiyenko.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.9.164.139 (talk) 14:59, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Valery Pshenichny position
Talk:1000 Broadway

message: * Added citation for "Ban Roll-on Building" and removed the , also removed the reference "R2D2" as a nickname since I could find no mention of it on any site or publication.  The information should be moved back to the live article if a citation is found for its usage.  Darryl.P.Pike (talk) 03:05, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nickname of building
Talk:Congress Center

message: The name of this building is now Sixth + Main per Unico website's portfolio. I don't know how to officially change the name of the building in the headline so I'm going to leave this alone but I am going to tag it as outdated. Also, it is currently the 14th tallest building in Portland. Masterscraper (talk) 03:05, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Outdated information
Talk:Princess Helen of Serbia

message: I titled this article Helen of Serbia because it is the name usually used in the literature for her. However, I called her "Princess Jelena of Serbia" in the lead of the article because this was her birth name and what she was known as in her home country and in Russia as well, using the version Elena or Yelena. --Bookworm857158367 (talk) 02:11, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: We are not writing in Russian or in Serbian. If you feel this strongly, change the lead of Nicholas II's article to Nikolai II and watch it get revert. Stop trying to assert ownership over articles. Charles 02:14, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You appear to be doing much the same thing you've accused me of doing, with multiple articles. I continue to think she should be referred to as Jelena in the lead. --Bookworm857158367 (talk) 02:22, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You're not going to turn the tables on this one. You advocate forcing native language names on English Wikipedia like "Nikolai" which are not English and the like. Charles 02:31, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No, what I advocated was that the lead of that article might say "Tsar Nikolai II, commonly known in English as Nicholas II" while leaving the title of the article as Nicholas II because he is so widely known as Nicholas II, same as with this article. I think articles should be titled according to the most widely known name, but the lead of an article might start with the closest phonetic spelling of the name they were called by in their country of origin, followed by the commonly known English version of the name right after. This person was most widely known as Helen in English-speaking countries up to the present day, but called some version of Jelena or Yelena or Elena in Russia and Serbia. In the case of her husband, he seems to be referred to as Ioann in all the recent literature , though his wife is still known as Helen. I'm not advocating Russian name titles for all the articles, just for the ones where the Russian names are used more often in the most recent bios and magazine articles. --Bookworm857158367 (talk) 02:53, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Names

message: Wouldn't Helena be a better translation of her name Jelena? Most Eastern European royalty with this name is usually under Helena rather than Helen. --Queen Elizabeth II's Little Spy (talk) 19:25, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Most English sources identify her as Helen. I also saw Ellen used when I originally wrote the article but none of them used Helena. --Bookworm857158367 (talk) 23:25, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Helena 
Talk:Aga Khan Agency for Microfinance

message: Aga Khan IV is the title of the guy's article so that should be used here. His Highness the Aga Khan, is less clear, and not necessary. BlueValour 03:53, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Titles 
Talk:Beauvais Cathedral

message: For reference, the following article exists: St. Pierre De Beauvais
Published in the early 1900's.
Smithville 07:14, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference 

message: There was a 30 minute cartoon (drama documentary) on the construction of the cathedral shown in the UK in the 1980's. Can anyone remember the name of the cartoon? --Mattyw 14:28, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Media

message: As a reader, it would be interesting to me if there was some more information in some more precision when the specific stages of reinforcing the structures were accomplished, even in very general terms, not necessarily even in precise years. As it is, there is no idea conveyed just when the reinforncements were made. -- Cimon Avaro; on a pogostick. (talk) 11:28, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The timing is unknown as to the installation of the external support rods made of iron, but it could have been feasible by the 16th century. Whenever they were installed, they were removed in the 1960s thinking that they added to the problem. However the oscillations in strong winds were worse than before, so they were replaced by steel rods. Now they think that the use of steel makes the linked buttresses too rigid. As for the large internal support trusses, they were installed in the 1990s. Likewise, there is fear now that they may also be increasing stresses to the structure. High level computer studies are in progress to sort all this out. I could try to add some of this to the article if desired.Tvbanfield (talk) 21:46, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That would be awesome!!! -- Cimon Avaro; on a pogostick. (talk) 02:17, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timing of the reinforcement efforts? 

message: The small Romanesque church of the 10th century known as the Basse Œuvre, much restored, still occupies the site destined for the nave.
:Somewhat unclear on my english usages, but isn't this a slight misuse of the word "destined". Wouldn't "planned", "prefigured", "intended" or "envisaged" or some such be much preferable. To me "destined" denotes something that did indeed come to pass. Which clearly hasn't happened yet. -- Cimon Avaro; on a pogostick. (talk) 17:09, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Usage of "destined"?
Talk:Luostari (inhabited locality)

message: Well... It wasn't really occupied by Germany at any time, because Finland was an ally to Germany that time. Germany was responsible for defence of the Northern Finland, but they could not, despite they did try, invade much of Russia that time.
--85.76.79.232 (talk) 19:39, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Concerns
Talk:Mae Hong Son Airport

message: More info in a recent Bangkok Post article:
http://www.bangkokpost.com/business/aviation/409977/mae-hong-son-tourism-grounded
Nok Mini is up for sale. KAN air has requested a license to fly more flights at night.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.25.5.241 (talk) 06:22, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nok air stopped flying Mae Hong Son - Chiang Mai. Kan Air is currently the only carrier. 
Talk:Here Without You

message: Tributes to Anna Nichole Smith? That sounds laughably false to me - but anything is possible on YouTube, I guess. 71.235.238.148 03:44, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

message: :Image:3 doors down here without you.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 05:37, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:3 doors down here without you.jpg

message: Just to set the record straight, the song is called "Here Without You", not "Here without You". I know it's only minor, but still... I've already had to change it three times in three separate places, so I'm just trying to get the record straight. Wikimaster97 (talk) 01:19, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Tired of Making the Same Edit Over and Over...

message: Could someone list the genres of this song?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:C7:C201:C640:F47E:5B35:8067:73AA (talk) 15:12, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genres
Talk:Gotta Get Thru This (song)

message: I've made edits to this page as well as the Daniel Bedingfield main article page to request a citation for the brand of software Bedingfield used to record his first album.  On this page, it is alleged that he used the Reason Audio Recording Software, while on the main article page, it is supposed that he used the Making Waves Audio Recording Software.  We need some clarification on this discrepancy.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dolenjack (talk • contribs) 21:30, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Album recorded with what software? 

message: The article states that the director of the video "cast[ed] a red-haired American dancer named Gina". However [http://www.lindzi.com/interviews/daniel.htm this source states that Gina is actually the inspiration for the song "It's about this flaming red-head from New Jersey, called Gina. I was passionately in love with her and I wanted to be with her, but didn't have the guts to."
Unless they're both the same person, or it's a coincidence.
--10:32, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  The model is possibly inaccurate 
Talk:Portland Institute for Contemporary Art

message: *Support merge as nom. Both articles are very short and the festival would probably not pass WP:NOTE on its own. Katr67 (talk) 01:52, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: Comment I am using nom here as shorthand for "nominator". I'm supporting the merge as the nominator. Please don't change people's posts on talk pages. See WP:TALK. And these don't usually get long enough to require separate sections. Katr67 (talk) 01:35, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Talk:Climbing protection

message: The UIAA section sounds like it was written to promote the organisation by making unverified claims that it is somehow superior to the CEN organization, even to the point of giving contact info for the upcoming annual meeting.  I would vote that it should be edited to limit itself to only describing the organisation itself.
76.118.143.119 (talk) 01:39, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias 

message: Have overhauled the rock-climbing equipment article (which has a section on climbing protection). Am going to merge the remaining material from this article not yet in it (certification and types of protection used by each type); otherwise the two articles end up explaining the same concepts and there is duplication or WP:FORKING. Aszx5000 (talk) 20:13, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I have not merged all of the useable material (including certification) now. Aszx5000 (talk) 14:11, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Rock-climbing equipment]]
Talk:Beaverton Transit Center

message: I need to point out that I believe both Beaverton Transit Center and Cedar Hills Transit Center, the latter of which had been superseded by the Sunset Transit Center as of 1998 (when Westside MAX to Hillsboro had officially opened), had originally opened around September 3, 1978 (which also appears to coincide with TriMet's "Tri It" campaign); they are both mentioned in the revised Orange Deer (West) service area route updates (one page before the route updates for areas other than the Orange Deer area) that appear at the end of TriMet's 1978 Trip Atlas. 
Why am I saying this, for all those TriMet history buffs??? The June 17, 1979 date in TriMet's timeline of events to 1993 (from their 1994 calendar) refers only to when timed transfers had been inaugurated at the then-nearly-a-year-old and original Beaverton TC. 
But if the June 1979 date you found is true, then that would also mean that such other updates like the new routing for Milwaukie Transit Center (from SE 21st Ave. & Monroe St. to SE 21st Ave. & Jackson St., where it remains to this day), and the route extensions for 71-Killingsworth (now 72-Killingsworth-82nd Avenue) to NE 92nd & Sandy and 75-39th Avenue (now 75-Lombard-39th Avenue) to Milwaukie, and three new routes to Swan Island (25-Portland-Swan Island, 92-Gresham-Swan Island and 93-Oregon City-Swan Island) would have happened in this same old time period.
WikiPro1981X (talk) 03:36, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No, the 1978 "Tri-Met Ride Atlas" does not show Beaverton or Cedar Hills TCs, only the "Beaverton Park-and-Ride", which was in a different location (where the Beaverton Town Square shopping center now sits, just west of Fred Meyer), was just a bus stop, and (the parking lot) closed in 1979. Tri-Met printed an update to the "Atlas" – in the same cartographic style – to reflect all of the extensive westside service changes (several new routes created, etc.) that took effect June 17, 1979. The only copies I have of that 'Tri-Met Ride Atlas'-style update are a separate Deer-area-only leaflet, not an addition "at the end" of the full-system "Atlas", but from your comments it sounds as though the agency made a few of the latter.  Anyway, I have Oregonian articles from early 1979 making it clear that the Beaverton and Cedar Hills Transit Centers did not open until June 1979, and I intend to add them (as citations) to this article and the List of TriMet transit centers article when I have time, but these are low-readership articles, so it's not an urgent priority for me.  As one example: The Oregonian of May 22, 1979, pg. W1, first sentence: "Construction will begin soon on two Tri-Met transfer stations in Beaverton and Cedar Hills as part of increased bus service scheduled to start June 17." SJ Morg (talk) 04:50, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you very much. Please see the revisions I made in my original message. WikiPro1981X (talk) 19:54, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  1978 TriMet Trip Atlas
Talk:Cascades station

message: * https://web.archive.org/web/20020606093254/http://www.tri-met.org/max/redline/cascadss.htm (Jun 6, 2002)
* https://web.archive.org/web/20040319141321/http://tri-met.org:80/max/redline/cascadss.htm (March 19, 2004)
* https://web.archive.org/web/20070108125623/http://www.trimet.org:80/max/stations/index.htm (Jan 8, 2007)
* https://web.archive.org/web/20070113080428/http://www.trimet.org:80/max/stations/index.htm (Jan 13, 2007)
truflip99 (talk) 16:16, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening date sources
Talk:Gresham Central Transit Center

message: Originally, when I visited this page it suggested this particular transit center had only existed during the time of MAX starting September 5, 1986. Recently, I found a slight correction that it opened in 1981, which makes sense because of it being mentioned in TriMet's 1982 Self Service Fare Manual describing the list of route changes which had taken effect that September 5th. If anyone can point out exactly when in 1981 the opening of Gresham TC occurred, please comment below.
*The routes it served initially included:
**9-Powell 
**19-Division (now 4-Division; rush-hour portion of route east of Gresham TC is now served by 84-Kelso-Boring to Kelso; southern part of route from Kelso to Sandy is currently handled through Sandy Area Metro Transit)
**19-East Glisan (now 19-Glisan; current route now ends east at Gateway TC)
**44-Gresham (defunct)
**80-Gresham-Troutdale (now 80-Kane-Troutdale Road)
**81-Fairview-Gresham (portions now served by 12-Sandy Blvd.)
However, one thing doesn't seem right about the #19 (before 9/5/82): did the #19-East Glisan portion end at Gresham TC when it was new? Or would it have been #19-Division?
*After September 5, 1986 and the slight renaming to Gresham Central Transit Center, this was the list of routes it had served:
**4-Division
**9-Powell
**25-Gresham-Glisan (current route, as of about 1993, is 25-Glisan-Rockwood and now ends east at Rockwood TC, currently under renovation)
**26-Stark (now part of current route 20-Burnside-Stark)
**80-Gresham-Troutdale (today 80-Kane-Troutdale Road)
**81-Rockwood-Gresham (mostly defunct)
**84-Sandy-Boring (now 84-Kelso-Boring; old route was formerly part of the Division route)
WikiPro1981X (talk) 20:13, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gresham Transit Center Older Than 1986
Talk:Gresham City Hall station

message: * https://www.opb.org/article/2022/07/11/multnomah-county-buys-trimet-park-and-ride-lot-for-126m-library-in-gresham/
* https://pamplinmedia.com/go/42-news/551214-441150-signed-agreement-brings-greshams-flagship-library-a-step-closer
truflip99 (talk) 16:43, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Mult Co library