Talk:Choa Chu Kang MRT/LRT station

message: I found a number of shops at Choa chu Kang MRT station  —Preceding unsigned comment added by RacerzGTR (talk • contribs) 09:54, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: New Shop under Choa Chu Kang MRT Station

message: :Image:NS logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 23:57, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:NS logo.jpg

message: An editor going by the handle of Lee480 has been very insistant on updating the progress of installation for the Platform Screen Door section which I'm pretty sure does not comply with Wikipedia policies - WP:OR & WP:V. I would like an external opinion to the matter as the editor in question does not respond to my messages.  - Rgds. Planenut(Talk) 08:51, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Before jumping to conclusions, please refer to the material being cited from. I see no specific operational date being specified in the document. Unless you can produce a document say XXX Station's HHPSDs went into operation on XX MAY 2011. This is simply not sufficient. - Rgds. Planenut(Talk) 13:44, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm fine with the HHSPD statement being included as part of History being included in the article but not as a standalone section to warrant one and definitely not the the dates of completion and going "live". See WP:NOT#NEWS - Rgds. Planenut(Talk) 13:55, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

text: Please refer to WP:SPS. A forum no matter how independent is it is still NOT a reliable source of information. Only certain sources are approved. See WP:SOURCES. I quote The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth which means no matter how much you guys know first hand, it will not pass as verificable information unless the citied from an approved source. - Rgds. Planenut(Talk) 13:55, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

text: Well if you look at my edits in relation to the HHSPDs have been inclusion of citation tags and not removals. Material without citations can be freely challenged. Remember that contributing to wikipedia is not complusory. (See WP:CHOICE) - Rgds. Planenut(Talk) 14:30, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfC: Original Research Being Included 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Aljunied MRT Station which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 09:30, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion in progress