Talk:Freedom of religion in Pakistan

message: I urge all members to be on the lookout for OneGuy who has slapped a VFD on all discrimination articles against Islam. Kindly refute this effort by cross voting on all other discrimination pages
# Discrimination against non-Muslims in Pakistan
# Discrimination against non-Muslims in Sudan
# Islam and Mauritanian law
# Discrimination against non-Muslims in Iran
# Discrimination against non-Muslims in Saudi Arabia
# Discrimination against non-Muslims in Afghanistan
# Discrimination against non-Muslims in Malaysia
We need your votes so this can remain wikiepedia and not become Meccapedia--Malbear 05:52, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Discrimination pages

message: This really does have a point of vew and all the other ones have POV's. Just because a minority did 9/11 doesn't mean you should put a bad face face on 1.2 billion people.
:Um, what does 9/11 have to do with this article? Jayjg (talk) 04:17, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is one of the the most massive pieces of POV I've ever seen on Wikipedia. What do you propose we do, Jayjg? K-UNIT 03:26, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 

message: According to everything Ive read and seen,Jinnah established Pakistan as a seclar state.From what I know,Pakistan only became an Islamic republic somehwere in the 50s but Im not 100%.
What I do know is that QUid-I-Azam Muhammed ALi Jinnah wanted to gurantee religious freedom through out Pakistan.74.98.241.189 06:17, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  established as an"Islamic republic" 

message: I've just copyedited this article, removed a lot of tautologies, wikified it, restructured it, added some sources and tried to start addressing the enormous problem of NPOV. I hope this helps. Nadirali above is quite correct in suggesting that Pakistan was established as a secular state and that it only became officially Islamic some years after Jinnah's death. I also agree with the several editors above who point out that the article is very badly sourced and POV. It needs much more work. I have left some unsourced material in for now, though only as a basis from which to start working. -- TinaSparkle 21:47, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Major edit

message: It seems like many changes have occurred since this article was "excessively" tagged. This article is well referenced including credible sources such as the CIA Factbook. I am removing the tags. Please details any objections in this talk section. Prester John  -(Talk to the Hand) 18:24, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Tagging

message: Why is it not taking about how other minority groups get persecuted and stalked, murdered and even jailed for their beliefs. 
People should know that Pakistan as a country really does not welcome any other way of thinking than that of the country itself. If someone calls themselves Muslim and reads the same Quran, believes in one God and prays the se way, believes in the Holy Prophet SAW being the last law bearing Prophet why is he being persecuted.
Please don't try to hide these facts, add them for others to be clear about. Tellydeewangi (talk) 02:15, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ahmadis and minorities  

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Freedom of religion in Pakistan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061012075517/http://web.amnesty.org/library/Index/ENGASA330082001?open&of=ENG-PAK to http://web.amnesty.org/library/Index/ENGASA330082001?open&of=ENG-PAK
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:35, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Freedom of religion in Pakistan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091010050756/http://pewforum.org/newassets/images/reports/Muslimpopulation/Muslimpopulation.pdf to http://pewforum.org/newassets/images/reports/Muslimpopulation/Muslimpopulation.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:42, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: recently mentioned that the topic of forced conversions in Pakistan should be dealt with at this article, and I would agree. If there are no objections, I can go ahead and add some content here.VR talk 17:00, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Forced conversion 

message: I don't think that Freedom of religion in Pakistan#Sexual freedom is within the scope of this article, even though Pakistan's conservative laws on sex are influenced by Islam. The article Freedom of religion in the United States doesn't include content on abortion and same-sex marriage even though American laws on both have been shaped by Christianity. Maybe this material belongs at LGBT rights in Pakistan or somewhere else.VR talk 01:49, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Sexual freedom

message: There seems to be an (or several) editor(s) making some edits to the section on the Ahmadi position which advocate for a certain perspective as a result of the law. This is far outside my expertise, more I noticed some issues and have tagged it. Hopefully someone who knows more can clarify things a bit. Photonsoup (talk) 15:38, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: cab you tell about what sentences you are talking about?  ArmorredKnight (talk) 13:44, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality in edits