Talk:Penile frenulum

message: I've searched the internet and I cannot find any site that recommends - or explains - manual stretching and using creams to treat FB.  Everywhere I've looked says frenuplasty is the way to go.  Could someone link some sites to this article relating to stretching techniques? 199.126.137.209 17:28, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The only medically relevant article I know of is the one linked here: http://www.male-initiation.net/frenulum_studies3.html#start by Hernaez Manrique, et al. "Elongación del frenillo balanoprepucial con una técnica muy sencilla" Arch Esp Urol 1990 Jan-Feb;43(1):78-9. As it is in spanish, and uses some kind of vascular clips, all it does for me is show that stretching does in fact work. Stretching manually takes a long time though (we're talking months of stretching, for 20-30 minutes at least, ever day), and if the frenulum is already thin it usually results in a tear rather than elongation. It is possible with dedication which should be obvious without any references. Any part of your body can be stretched or molded to some extent, and the frenulum is no exception. I think stretching should be added as a treatment option along with the others, but probably with a warning and/or information that it is time-consuming and unless care is taken, a tear is a very common occurrence. Any other inputs? Araziel (talk) 12:40, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Treatments for frenulum breve

message: I find that the second picture down is not very sharp, in other words it's blurry and not very good quality, I'm going to add a better quality picture in the additional pictures. Respond to this comment if you want to comment. Nikon307 03:50, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Would everyone who is reverting pictures in and out, or who wishes to comment on which picture is better, please  state clearly here which picture you're talking about and why you think it's better.  Don't just revert without comment.  Nikon307 and Mercurydweller, it's not clear to me what specific images you're expressing opinions about. Thanks.  --Coppertwig 19:37, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: See note at the top of this page and WP:NOTCENSORED Beeswaxcandle (talk) 08:06, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures 

message: The pictured penis with frenular breve displays chordee, and would undergo frenectomy during circumcision.TipPt 01:21, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Frenulum breve jpg 

message: It would be a good idea to have a picture of a circumcised penis with the frenulum not directly removed, for fair comparison. Can someone do this?
82.46.151.84 (talk) 16:54, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture of Circumcised with a (part of) Frenulum 

message: can this misng frenulum persons able to satisfy their wifes i mean they enjoy their sexual life normally also mention,that a virgin with above said problem can make something happen on his weddings first night. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.123.63.149 (talk • contribs) 
:I'm not aware of any evidence suggesting that men without a frenulum are unable to satisfy their wives. Jakew (talk) 11:54, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  quarery 

message: I've reverted the addition of Schober et al., as this source does not mention the frenulum.  Please note that policy does not permit us to impose our own interpretation on a source; it has to be directly related to the subject of the article and we must report what it says about the subject of the article.  To respond to the edit summary "but they didn't say it. want a cite for the zone being the same?", unfortunately we can't use another source per WP:SYNTH, except where that other source explicitly refers to both the frenulum and Schober's paper. Jakew (talk) 09:47, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Schober

message: Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted.
Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia.
This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link.
If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting.
If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page.
If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta.
When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags.
The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true.
Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
*http://www.norm.org/frenular.pdf
*:Triggered by \bnorm\.org\b on the local blacklist
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 18:27, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page 

message: I'm not sure there needs to be more than one, maybe two images on this page: one in the infobox, and probably one illustrating a frenectomy (but definitely not several, as there is now). I've linked the Wikimedia Commons category, so a gallery here is largely unnecessary, in my opinion. clpo13(talk) 00:57, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gallery 

message: The term 'vernal mucosa' appears to be meaningless (Google results trace back to this page), not an accurate medical term. The frenulum doesn't attach to a mucous membrane, and the source cited for the claim that it connects to the vernal musoca doesn't use the term. Colonycollapse (talk) 07:05, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect anatomical description, info missing in link 

message: Can we please change the name of this article to something that doesn’t make my ears bleed? “Frenulum of prepuce of penis” does not sound grammatically correct. And we should be using whatever the WP:COMMONNAME is. Prcc27 (talk) 03:45, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, 'Frenulum of the penis" would be sufficient. We call the prepuce the foreskin in other articles, so it could be "Frenulum of the foreskin". But I'm pinging you on your comment above about Morris being fringe and I wonder if you agree? Cheers. Thelisteninghand (talk) 16:00, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

text: I think “of the” sounds better than “of”, but I noticed the other frenulum article titles just say “of”.. Prcc27 (talk) 22:34, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, same thing in the corona of glans penis, body of penis etc. I think if it is to change, frenulum of penis would be fine. Piccco (talk) 21:04, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It needs the definite article I think, and probably to be anatomically correct 'Frenulum of the foreskin' - maybe a doctor can confirm? Thelisteninghand (talk) 20:33, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  "Penile frenulum" seems the easiest. Does anyone object to me moving it there? . KlayCax (talk) 09:54, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes, I'm with that. Seems a proper term used here: https://www.cuh.nhs.uk/patient-information/lengthening-of-the-penile-frenulum-frenuloplasty/ Thelisteninghand (talk) 15:04, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

text: Seems fine to me too Piccco (talk) 15:55, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Name change revisited