Talk:Big Brothers Big Sisters of America

message: Cleanup Co-ordination	Cleanup Co-ordination
                     	This article has recently been tagged as requiring cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards.
The article may have been flagged as needing cleanup because it has been suggested that:
*the article needs formatting, proofreading, or rephrasing in comprehensible English. 
*the article has multiple overlapping problems. 
*the article is very short and might need expanding, removal or merging with a broader article
For a full list of possible problems see Wikipedia:Manual of Style.
As part of the cleanup process, the automated bot PocKleanBot has generated this notice as a focus of cleanup efforts, and also contacted several contributing editors of the article to bring their attention to the problem. You should use this section to discuss possible resolution of the problem and achieve consensus for action. Only when there is a consensus that the article is now cleaned up should you then de-list it by deleting the cleanup tag from the article, this causes the article to drop off the monthly cleanup-needed list page.
===Discussion===    	
===Discussion===
The links section is excessive.  I believe that two official links, to the US and International sites, would be sufficient - otherwise we could be linking to every single Big Brothers page, of which there are many; this is in violation of the policy on excessive links.  Additional third-party links would help as well.  --otherlleft 16:32, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. The page reads like an advertisement for the association and the comments on the talk page were deleted by an anonymous user. A revamp is needed by someone knowledgeable about the organisation but not connected to it... Simulato (talk) 05:19, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

text: I agree as well. Although this organization is definitely notable and the article should not be deleted, it reads far too much like an advertisement. For example, the bolded text of "the oldest, largest and most effective youth mentoring organization in the United States"... That is strange styling. In fact, it is quite poor styling. "Big Brothers Big Sisters mentors children, ages 6 through 18, in communities across the country - including yours."? That is not encyclopedic. This article needs a major revamp, and, like Simulato said, by someone preferably NOT from the organization but knowledgeable about it?  --Heero Kirashami (talk) 04:25, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

text: I definitely think that as part of the cleanup that 'Donations' link should go. No matter how good the cause, it looks too much like WP is soliciting donations for the group. Kay Dekker (talk) 19:33, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

text: The content of this page could definitely be filled by gathering the numerous studies and their statistics. There has not been a dramatic update to the page and I believe that it could benefit many to have a clear non-biased understanding of Big Brothers Big Sisters. Chrisanchezz (talk) 03:28, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Cleanup Co-Ordination Point 

message: |}</div>
The links section is excessive.  I believe that two official links, to the US and International sites, would be sufficient - otherwise we could be linking to every single Big Brothers page, of which there are many; this is in violation of the policy on excessive links.  Additional third-party links would help as well.  --otherlleft 16:32, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. The page reads like an advertisement for the association and the comments on the talk page were deleted by an anonymous user. A revamp is needed by someone knowledgeable about the organisation but not connected to it... Simulato (talk) 05:19, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

text: I agree as well. Although this organization is definitely notable and the article should not be deleted, it reads far too much like an advertisement. For example, the bolded text of "the oldest, largest and most effective youth mentoring organization in the United States"... That is strange styling. In fact, it is quite poor styling. "Big Brothers Big Sisters mentors children, ages 6 through 18, in communities across the country - including yours."? That is not encyclopedic. This article needs a major revamp, and, like Simulato said, by someone preferably NOT from the organization but knowledgeable about it?  --Heero Kirashami (talk) 04:25, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

text: I definitely think that as part of the cleanup that 'Donations' link should go. No matter how good the cause, it looks too much like WP is soliciting donations for the group. Kay Dekker (talk) 19:33, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

text: The content of this page could definitely be filled by gathering the numerous studies and their statistics. There has not been a dramatic update to the page and I believe that it could benefit many to have a clear non-biased understanding of Big Brothers Big Sisters. Chrisanchezz (talk) 03:28, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: This article needs to be completely redone from the ground up. It is blatant advertising.--Borealis9 (talk) 08:09, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speedy Deletion? 

message: A section needs to be added to deal with the numerous convictions of BBBS mentors for sex abuse or rape of their charges.
eg David Foley, 
eg a 1987 article: http://articles.latimes.com/1987-10-13/local/me-13913_1_big-brother
Across the country, at least 22 Big Brothers were convicted of sex crimes from 1982 to 1987 after taking sexual liberties with their charges, according to Big Brothers of America records. Records kept by Big Brothers of Greater Los Angeles show that, since 1982, at least five of its volunteers have been convicted in the area. A sixth case is pending.
There are countless more.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.222.194.228 (talk) 23:11, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sex Abuse 

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant 
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 18:18, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Big Brothers Big Sisters.jpg Nominated for Deletion

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Big Brothers Big Sisters of America. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20100811114244/http://www.ppv.org:80/ppv/publication.asp?search_id=0&publication_id=111§ion_id=0 to http://www.ppv.org/ppv/publication.asp?search_id=0&publication_id=111§ion_id=0
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20071110230600/http://www.glamalert.com:80/reelmoments/ to http://www.glamalert.com/reelmoments/
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070928011422/http://www.give.org/seal.asp?ID=17411302005&msource=0602ENv3&tr=y&auid=1435214 to http://www.give.org/seal.asp?ID=17411302005&msource=0602ENv3&tr=y&auid=1435214
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:11, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified