lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Volume 1 (CKY album)

message: Move Parsecboy (talk) 13:55, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Support CKY has no particular claim to this as a title. --Bejnar (talk) 20:24, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

text: Any additional comments:
*There is Grateful Dead Download Series Volume 1... which would be "Volume 1" 76.66.195.63 (talk) 08:24, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Support CKY has no particular claim to this as a title. --Bejnar (talk) 20:24, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: :Any additional comments:
*There is Grateful Dead Download Series Volume 1... which would be "Volume 1" 76.66.195.63 (talk) 08:24, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: The consensus above was to move the page to Volume 1 (CKY album); why the hell has this random member moved the article about a thousand times?! Will someone please move it back to its rightful place and sort out all these redirects... and possibly warn the member. Andre666 (talk) 10:19, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've restored the article to the previous location. JPG-GR (talk) 18:55, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It  has been moved... again. Andre666 (talk) 17:43, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  WHAT THE HELL? 

message: This page needs to be moved back to Volume 1 (CKY album), and then move protection can be requested. Yes, this is necessary; look at all the crazy move antics which have happened recently. Andre666 (talk) 15:39, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move protection?
Talk:Chris McGregor

message: A good additional reference source for Chris McGregor is Jazz: The Essential Companion (Ian Carr, Digby Fairweather, Brian Priestley, 1988) which contains a photograph of Chris McGregor and discography.
Other links for Chris McGregor should include Abdullah Ibrahim (Dollar Brand), who preceeded the Blue Notes' move to Europe and helped them when they arrived. Another good link is Tunji Oyelana, a Nigerian composer/musician/bandleader. The Brotherhood of Breath recorded his composition, "Tungi's Song". (There is no Wikipedia page for Tunji Oyelana. He is from Ibadan, Nigeria, is a widely influential musician, and has composed and performed for theatre, working with notable playwrights including Wole Soyinka. I don't know enough about him to write an article, but someone out there must!)
Chopandquench 22:44, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Hepatitis F virus

message: I've updated this page. It sounded like Deka et al had been pulling a hoax a la Alan Sokal, quod non. I have no references for the confirmatory studies, but Kelly & Skidmore state categorically that testing for it is pointless. JFW | T@lk 22:51, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

message: Should this page be called "Hepatitis F Virus" rather than "Hepatitis F"? The articles on other varieities of Hepatitis make this distinction. It would also improve the List of Viruses. -EarthRise33 21:51, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done Scray (talk) 17:05, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Virus vs Disease
Talk:Stuart Thayer

message: My god, I think this article was written by the guy himself.
- No way.  I know this guy very well and it simply would not occur to him to do it.
- the bio is solid although I can't locate the source. Breschard 04:17, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please don't remove  tags unless the article is not about a living person.  Also, without a source, the article fails Wikipedia:Verifiability; "because User:Breschard says its solid" doesn't really cut it. -- Jonel | Speak 08:49, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ecclesia (sociology of religion)

message: This article is nothing more than a collection of mismatched sentences. It looks like it was written by a committee who had no contact or knowledge of one another. It is fatally confused.
Looking at it, as a writing teacher, sentence by sentence:
*An ecclesia is defined in the original Greek as "the church" (called out or chosen ones), or the body of Christ. - OK
*It symbolically connotates the diverse tapestry of those who confess Jesus Christ as one and the same with God the Creator and Master of the Universe. - pretentious sentence
*It has nothing to do with religious denominations, the sect and the cult. - why not?
*It does not necessarily correspond to dominant social and political culture. - what does this mean?
*More often than not is misunderstood to be a counter society, but has inherently wrapped in it's doctrine the best long term results for the world. - what in the world does this mean?
*Misunderstanding has long led tyrants, demogogues and Charlatins in various ages to persecute the ecclesia wherever they are from East to West. - broad unsupported generalization
*The state churches are often counter to ecclesias by mere factors of struggles of power and other distractions from the main mission of the ecclesia. - unsupported opinion
*Leadership falls to misguided information or bold face contempt for the teachings of Jesus Christ. - meaningless and unsupported opinion.
*This is opposite the servant leadership style Jesus Christ taught. - what is opposite? vague, vague
*Though they [who?] need not be: a state church by definition has official legal recognition of its role in the society, while an ecclesia might not. - Yes, this last part is a fact
The article needs a complete rewrite. Halcatalyst 22:31, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Kino (band)

message: Efenstor Thank you so much for expanding this to a wonderfull article. You rock :) : Comrade james 23:14, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Old talk

message: It looks as if they all died in 1990. It's not true is it?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.111.61.108 (talk) 15:12, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: None of them, except for Tsoi and Guryanov, are dead. The dates in parentheses next to their names are the time periods in which they were in the band. 108.244.75.113 (talk) 22:35, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: All Dead?

message: Calling KINO a "Soviet rock band" seems a bit odd to me. It was a rock band that existed during the Soviet times, but they themselves were not Soviet (anti-Soviet, if anything:) I ll make appropriate edits Cosainsé (talk) 04:06, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, but you just went full retard.78.30.196.158 (talk) 00:16, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Soviet rock band 

message: I expanded the article with information from the Russian Wikipedia. Amerikanskaya Stilyaga (talk) 13:17, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion
Talk:Microsoft Virtual Server

message: Does anyone know if Virtual Server is compatible with Windows XP Home systems? Mga 23:16, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I think its installer requires that it be installed on Windows Server 2003 or Windows 2000 Server only (no Pro or Home editions). -- Bovineone 21:43, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It can be installed on XP Pro, but Microsoft emphasizes that this is not recommended for production installs and should only be done for development or evaluation purposes. -- Bovineone 07:00, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Compatibility

message: Looking for a citation on the assertation that Virtual Server cripples Linux installs.  I had heard rumors, but nothing "authoritative" until I read this page.  This very well could be true, but it could also be that it's poorly written and does a lousy job virtualizing Linux, OR it might just be a rumor... Can anybody find a good citation for this? Thx1200 15:28, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Crippled Performance Citation

message: :The following comment was originally posted on the article page. I moved it to the Talk page. — EagleOne\Talk 18:13, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Virtual server" redirect

message: This should redirect to "Virtual Machine", not here.  Redirecting "Virtual Server" (as I was) to "Microsoft Virtual Server" rather than "Virtual Machine" seems inappropriate.  I noticed that I'm not the only one voicing this concern.  
How does this get changed?
I'm sorry if this is in the wrong spot, but I'm new here, and don't know how to post an edit for this item.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Kwandar (talk • contribs) 
:I have made Virtual Server and Virtual server lead to a disambiguation page to allow the reader to select the intended destination. -- Bovineone 22:03, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The redirect from Virtual Server is inappropriate 

message: Is Virtual Server 2005 R2 SP1 compatible with Windows Vista?  -- 141.224.233.4 20:44, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not compatible with Windows 7 after all...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.24.172.1 (talk) 05:31, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vista Compatible?
Talk:Fur Fighters

message: Other fur game:
Brutal - Paws of Fury for the Sega Genesis
--Abdull 23:17, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The phrase 'Uber Bear' redirects to this page, but is not mentioned on the page. Disjointed editing problem. Uber Bear is a Fur Fighters character, but I don't know enough to add details/revert. Centrepull (talk) 19:18, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uber Bear info needed 

message: This is a relatively obscure game, so people probably don't care that much, but the "Critical Reaction" section should be lower down the article and it should be titled "Reception" and it should not feature all that unreferenced editorial but quote actual reviews and metacritic scores. Bygberbrown (talk) 00:20, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Critical Reaction" section  

message: This whole article seems to have been written by the developers of the iPad version on 2012-07-20 to advertise its return. Bygberbrown (talk) 00:22, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias
Talk:Babe: Pig in the City

message: I can't believe that this film was banned in North America. It seems strange all together, banned in the US and Canada? I will delete it. If anyone can find a good source, then I'm sorry. Soetermans 18:49, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Banned? 

message: I took the information on money earned directly from the Wikipeida article on box office bombs. Please DO NOT undo my edit unless you also change the figures on the box office bombs article
63.26.213.82 (talk) 03:47, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Money Earned 

message: Sorry, my brother is being a pervert. He's agreed to stop, Sorry for the inconvienience.class="autosigned">—Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.52.177.124 (talk) 23:22, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  There's no nudity in the final scene 
Talk:Christians in Iran/Archive 1

message: DO NOT EDIT OR POST REPLIES TO THIS PAGE. THIS PAGE IS AN ARCHIVE.
This archive page covers approximately the dates between July 6, 2004 and December 22, 2005.
Post replies to the main talk page, copying or summarizing the section you are
replying to if necessary.
Please add new archivals to Talk:Christians_In_Iran/Archive02. (See Wikipedia:How to archive a talk page.) Thank you. AucamanTalk 23:35, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

message: I have now re-introduced Shapur's remark. I guess tolerance is a matter of degrees. In comparison to the Roman Empire, pre-Islamic Iran was indeed largely tolerant - even if its leading classes were contemptous.
With regard to the "glorious history of Christianity in Iran" - Iran has a multi-facetted history, its religious history is extremely rich and diverse. It should be therefore of little surprise that Christianity has its own stake in Iranian history, even if this is a matter of little importance to non-Christians - e.g. Shapur II or yourself.  Refdoc 12:37, 6 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Shapur's remark

message: I know very little about the history of Christianity in Iran; I have no idea whether a dispute is merited here (apart from the word "significant" in the first paragraph, now removed, which I agree is clearly POV.)  Can those who consider the article problematic please state their objections here, so they can be discussed and if necessary corrected - preferably bearing in mind the policy Wikipedia:Assume good faith? - Mustafaa 21:51, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Disputed?

message: The dispute has long died down. It circled lastly about sources for headcounts and estimates - sources are given and diverging counts/estimates are listed. i assume that any dispute is therefore currently resolved. Refdoc 01:54, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of dispute tags 

message: there is no mention of roman catholism in this article except oen brief mention.
Short shrift implies deliberateness. I would suggest (being the main author) lack of specific knowledge might be a more appropriate accusation. Please add what you know. Refdoc 09:23, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I wonder what is meant by the first comment. As this is a wiki, you should add what improvements you can. Off the top of my head, I don't think there are many Latin-rite Catholics in Iran, most Catholics are Chaldeans. --Gareth Hughes 16:26, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  giving short shrift to roman catholism
Talk:Military history of Mexico

message: Great article, I just realized it is still missing some topics. For future reference these are:
#The Yucatan Republic and the subsequent Caste War of Yucatan (a really long conflict, 80 years or so)
#Ayutla Revolution, just before the Reform War.
#The raising in arms of Porfirio Diaz against Lerdo de Tejada's intention of reelecting himself.
I should get around to help editing this article at some point... so many things to do... *sigh* -- Rune Welsh | ταλκ 02:49, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And of course, the drug patrolling.  I have so many things to do in real life that I can barely start on this article like I need to.  I really should have had this finished a long time ago.  It is a misfortune that I still have not gotten this to FA standards. εγκυκλοπαίδεια* 16:44, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Great website. εγκυκλοπαίδεια* 16:57, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing topics

message: I will definitely look into to this article someday to get it to FA status.  Unfortunately, the original writer, Enyclopedist, seems to be currently banned from the project, meaning I am not able to collaborate with him.  He general did a very good job from what I can tell. This user also has a very nice sig! (One I will probably "steal") Thanks all, OMEN 19:38, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article in general 

message: — Assignment last updated by Recarrillo (talk) 13:31, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: HIST273
Talk:Copper Mountain (Colorado)

message: As it stands now, the article looks like an advertisement for the ski resort.  It should be cleanup so that it contains for encyclopedia information.  --Hurricane111 00:07, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Edits entered as part of a class project only made the article read more like a Chamber of Commerce brochure. Do not students at a Harvard cyber law class have any better appreciation of the difference between encyclopedic content and a promotional pamphlet? Smithdaughtery 07:35, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup-importance

message: Added three photos of various locations at Copper Mountain. Hopefully that should satisfy the need for photos for now. --DebateLord 04:58, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Photographs

message: Somebody changed the name of the company Copper is operated by from Intrawest to 'Fortress'. Was this vandalism, or is that the name of the new operator? I remember something about it being sold, but don't remember the details. In the meantime, I've changed it back to Intrawest.--DebateLord 03:01, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I thought it was spam as well, but i just did a quick google search: intrawest fortress. Here's one result: Ski Press ArticleSearles2sels (PJ) 16:45, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Fortress?

message: I think keystone is over 3000 acres.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.133.243.70 (talk) 13:22, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Isn't Keystone larger (by area)
Category talk:Applied sciences

message: If it were not for Architecture, this cat would not be in the Art cat.  Oh well. -- Fplay 00:08, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Art category 

message: "Applied science is the use or the study of the use of scientific knowledge to develop technology.", if accurate, is far too restrictive for the inclusion of the various engineering fields, or medicine.  The purpose of maintenance, for instance, cannot remotely be "... to develop technology".
I suggest the definition is looked at.  It may well be a reasonable one, but if we stick to it then many of the fields currently listed should be struck off the "applied science" list.
Gravuritas (talk) 11:04, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition of applied science and fields included
Talk:Allhallows, Kent

message: Achtung: Allhallows-on-Sea, Hoo All Hallows. To be rationalised. Oh what a tangled web we weave... JackyR 00:13, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:HIH Insurance

message: Perhaps Adler could do with his own page as he was also involved in the One.Tel collapse (and this article seems to be more about him than HIH as such).--Jack Upland 00:14, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

message: Wasn't it convenient that the HIH collapse occured just at the time when Allianz had plans to expand business in Australia. They have largely taken over since then, benefitted from HIH and FAI being out of the picture. 
HIH fell over largely because they had bought a dud, FAI. The purchase of FAI went through Goldman & Sachs, who recommended that purchase. A high ranking Allianz manager had changed to Goldman & Sachs not so long before. 
If I were a script writer, I would explore how a manager can help his former work mates by, for instance, recommending the purchase of a company which makes the purchaser as well as the purchased fall over - so the work mates in the former company get rid of a rival and take over the market. 
No analysis is complete without explaining who benefitted and pointing to the areas where room for manipulating events in someone's favour existed, and name that company.
121.209.49.91 (talk) 02:22, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Forgotten aspect 
Talk:3-D elasticity

message: I finished this whole article before finding the Linear elasticity article, which covers this idea in a different way.  I think the 15 equations are still useful to be able to reference, if only because they help to explain the nature of stress.  The two pages should probably be combined, but I'm not sure how exactly.  Someone could even go as far as to delete this page, as long as the equations were added to the Linear elasticity page somehow. - EndingPop 17:19, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  The article 

message: I think we should stick to 3D in the article title, as 3D redirects to 3D. But I am more in favour of merging this article into linear elasticity. Berland 07:15, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  3-D or 3D
Talk:Lar Lubovitch Dance Company

message: The history says: 18:32, 22 December 2005 151.205.114.140 (Update provided by Robert Matson, Lar's company's Development Director) --Roland2 00:24, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: But does that mean the text isn't a copyvio?  It all appears to be copy and pasted from places on the website including http://www.lubovitch.org/Company/Lar_Lubovitch/lar_lubovitch.html and http://www.lubovitch.org/Company/Background/background.html Metros232 13:47, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright
Talk:Oxygenase

message: Hey, i've removed the wikify and context templates, because i felt both require experts that might be better drawn in by the . Feel free to add them though. Siebren 00:30, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikify/context Template Removal

message: There  are oxygenases which move two oxygen atoms, one to one substrate,and one to a 2-oxoglutarate substrate, at the same time. Are these monooxygenases, as I had been elsewhere told, or dioxygenases, as might be suggested in this article?
Briancady413 (talk) 14:46, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: On the distinction between dioxygenases and monooxygenases
Talk:Washington Initiative 912

message: Just make sure to include both sides. Yes on I-912 and No on I-912. By the time we are done with this the 2006 election season will be on us.
--8bitJake 00:31, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes

message: I'm kinda leaning on getting this article deleted.  It needs to have more information, such as what area it applies to (it looks like just Washington state). — Frecklefoot | Talk 22:11, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Too narrow scope
Talk:Twelve Conclusions of the Lollards

message: The summaries that are in place have three problems IMHO.
* In several cases they do not accurately reflect the original: missing the important aspects/ramification/remedies (e.g. that the pacifism specifically challenges Crusading, or the challenge to Aquinas and Corpus Christi). 
* In some cases, the Conclusion is watered down to become some  anachronistic sentiment: for example the call to ban goldsmiths and armorours and have only technology directly useful for subsistence is not just "simply living" (in the FF Schumacher "Small is Beautiful" sense) but is closer to the Amish/puritan approach (indeed almost closer to the Pol Pot "Year Zero" approach of de-technologizing the society.)  The Lollards and Wycliffites believed in radical evangelical poverty, not Marie Kondo voluntary simplification :-)  I have rewritten that one.  
* Editorially, we need to cope with that many people are interested in Lollards primarily viewed as as proto-modern-protestants, which can downplay the aspects of Lollardy that went beyond or behind it. There is a Chinese Whisper problem: someone summarizing someone summerizing Foxe's pro-protestant English re-translation (viewing the Lollards as proto-early-protestants) of the Fasciculi (an anti-Lollard Latin transation perhaps by Netter) of the original English. This makes it necessary to check any summaries against the Middle English originals (not as OR, but as the fact-checking necessary when sources are partisan or contested in order to get at least NPOV.) And IMHO it makes it useful to include quotations from the original Middle English to supplement and evidence the summary, and to give the flavour better.    
I have adjusted some of the article along the lines suggested. Rick Jelliffe (talk) 05:09, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Summaries
Talk:Academia Juárez

message: Academia Juarez is 7-12... Why does the caption talk about K-6? "The Dual-Language program starts at K-6 in two elementary schools: Colonia Dublán and Colonia Juárez and continues from 7th to 12th grade in both English and Spanish languages." Also, the so called Dual-Language program starts in Academia Juarez for some who enroll in the intensive english track. Furthermore, this is made even less relavant by the fact that some students don't attend Colonia Dublán and Colonia Juárez elementary schools at all. RANT OVER  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.232.90.164 (talk) 18:26, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

message: Possibly vanity, definitely not NPOV. Lujack 00:43, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:CICI-TV

message: Just for the record, the "digital" line in the Broadcast Infobox is meant to refer to a station's over-the-air DTV signal, not to cable or satellite channel assignments. Bearcat 00:42, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox