lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Category talk:Catholic secondary schools

message: We need a sub category for Augustinian Secondary Schools please! Would an adminstrator mind doing this please? St. Augustine's College, Brookvale and Villanova College can be added to this category. There are many more.   
Cor Unum 11:48, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Augustinian 

message: I'm going to add a category for the United States. --evrik (talk) 21:33, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: By country

message: There is already a structure in place to put the High Schools in. It is the Archdiocesan structure (Category:Roman_Catholic_Archdiocese_of_Philadelphia) of which they are already a part of.Tstrobaugh 19:22, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree.  A large percentage of Catholic high schools are not operated by the local Diocese.  The structure is fine as is.EagleFan (talk) 14:42, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Catholic structure
Talk:Belarusian Black Cats

message: :http://www.gazetaby.com/cont/art.php?sn_nid=9577 Xx236 (talk) 06:50, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: http://slounik.org/154988.html Xx236 (talk) 06:53, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Belarusian (tar) sources
Talk:N class destroyer

message: There is no reason to have this page separate from J and K class destroyer. The differences between the 3 flotillas are negligible, and they are treated as 1 class by authoratative works;
*Destroyers of World War II - Whiteley
*Conway's all the World's Fighting Ships (1922-1946)
*Royal Navy Destroyers since 1945 - Marriot
Either all flotillas should be treated as a single class (e.g. J, K and N class) or all three should be treated as 1 class. The latter is my preferred option, there is too little difference to justify separate articles on a rather obscure point. Emoscopes Talk 12:05, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You seem to know what you are doing, so you have my support. I've tweaked the merge notice slighty as a to/from. GraemeLeggett 12:10, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Forgot to give reason - logical route is merge in what is already on wikipedia re the N destroyers, then move the J and K article to J, K and N article. GraemeLeggett 12:13, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No problems. I'll let this lie for a few days in case there are any dissenters (highly doubtful). In the mean time I'll go busy myself with some War Emergency Programme stuff. Emoscopes Talk 12:14, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

text: As far as I know, the only major change was to ship "X" 4.7 in mounting in the more logical position facing backwards, the J and K having this training forward, and with a blind spot to the rear. As soon as i can locate my copy of Lenton i can confirm this Emoscopes Talk 04:54, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Merging
Talk:Maurice

message: since that is my name I was wondering what is the approximate number of people in the world with that name?
It's my name as well, so that's 2 of us. --86.137.121.235 17:39, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There are over 1,100 articles in Wikipedia for people with the first name of Maurice. Adding them to this disambiguation page would be a lot of work and would add almost no value for disambiguation. I propose to delete the section First name. If there is a consensus or at least no objection, I'll go ahead and do that in about a week. Thank you. SchreiberBike (talk) 05:42, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. SchreiberBike (talk) 22:56, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  First name section 
Talk:Altair IV

message: If we are goinging to cross reference names from two or more different Universe's they should probably be denoted.  Ex. The Altair IV mentioned in the Star Trek Universe is obviously NOT the same Altair IV from Forbidden Planet.  This maybe confusing to NON-SCI-FI afficionados.
FrankWilliams 12:19, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cross Referencing Names

message: I don't believe the "film is based on the novel" - indeed, I believe the novel was a post-production effort Voideater 20:20, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Novel Reference

message: I question the year stated in:
"It was visited in 2381 by the United Planets Cruiser C-57D, ..."
In the movie introduction the narrator gives the only date as being soon after the year 2200 A.D. And only one year travel time for the C-57D to Altair 4.
Even if using the novel version of the story:
"launched on its 10 year voyage (one year to the crew on-board) in 2200..."
2200 + 10 does not equal 2381.
In wikipedia article for Forbidden Planet, under Plot it states:
"In the early 2200s, the United Planets Cruiser C-57D is sent to the planet Altair IV..."
Early 2200's makes more sense for C-57D arrival at Altair 4 than the stated year: 2381.
74.129.202.93 (talk) 19:51, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The 2381 Arrival Date 

message: Does the planet really warrant its own article ?  It is really just background to the film.
Even if it does, this article contains too much about the plot of the film that does not relate to the planet. -- Beardo (talk) 13:05, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article 

message: Several earlier references of mine were not clear because the Film does not actually refer to the the C-57D's specific year of launch, while the Novel goes into detail. 
I've been a major contributor to the Article. I agree that there was too much of the storyline referenced. However, if, my SECTIONS NOT RELATED to the fictional planet description (other than the very basic storyline) are DELETED, I believe the Article will be able to stand on its own, being more to the point and clearer regarding this popularly known fictional planet.  PFSLAKES1 (talk) 22:00, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You should raise this at the deletion article. Alastairward (talk) 22:16, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding Deletion 

message: The information on the planet's appearance and surface views I originally added from the novel and the motion picture from some time back.
UNLESS you have chosen someone else, I can incorporate the pertinent information re the fictional planet into the Forbidden Planet article whenever I am so advised.  PFSLAKES1 (talk) 04:17, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  When to Incorporate Into ''Forbidden Planet'' Article
Talk:Yellow Sun (nuclear weapon)

message: I have removed the following from the bottom of the article's page:
All data used is verifiable from official declassified sources at The National Archives (TNA), London. Document ID supplied on request. Authors biographical note: as a newly qualified design engineer the author worked on the UK nuclear bomb programme from 1956-61. Blue Danube, Red Beard, Violet Club were some of the projects that the author worked on, as the youngest member of the design team at HCCL, Leeds.
Perhaps the writer may like to keep an eye on the article and possibly add some more later.
They may also like to contribute to the Blue Danube, and Red Beard articles - as yet there doesn't appear to be a Violet Club article - hint! Ian Dunster 12:24, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed from the article page bottom
Talk:Pierre Bonnard

message: We generally do not use mode packed in galleries of artworks such as these. See discussion here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Paul_Signac#RfC_concerning_use_of_galleries and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Paul_Signac#Modification_of_standard_gallery. Coldcreation (talk) 20:10, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gallery mode 

message: I respectfully really don't see the point of making images in  an article on art smaller, instead of using packed galleries.  It's much easier to compare images and to get the full effect of the work of art with a packed gallery.  rather than wasting a great deal of space to make the pictues smaller.  Where is the logic in this?   In what way did it improve the article to make the pictures smaller and harder to see? SiefkinDR (talk) 20:18, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  At 200px I see the images quite large on my screen. I recommend you adjust the pixel ratio on your screen. Go to Preferences in the menu bar (top of page), click on Appearance. Scroll down to File: Image size limit on file description pages: set this at 800x600px. Below that, set Thumbnail size: 220px. Hope that works. I used to have the same problem. These settings worked for me. Now images appear larger on my screen. Coldcreation (talk) 19:08, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why make images smaller?
Talk:Pawłokoma massacre

message: The alleged Russian article doesn't exist.
Xx236 12:28, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong link?

message: According to Polish TV - Polish members of mixed families.
Xx236 09:29, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm sorry but "Polish TV" does not sound like a respectable source. Did they (whoever claimed this on TV) refer to any research ? --Lysytalk 14:58, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  possibly some Polish  

message: Wasn't AK disbanded by the time of the massacre? Can we have a scholarly reference claiming AK was involved in the massacre? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  00:59, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Radio Free Europe - http://www.rferl.org/featuresarticle/2006/05/4c935b0f-8009-48dc-93d8-95344832adc7.html
Bobanni (talk) 01:33, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: He wants something published like a book or journal or something.  Look here: .  I realize it is only a footnote, but I am sure others can be found. Ostap 03:13, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, I consider Piotrowski a reliable source. I still think that (per my comments at AK talk page) we should clarify they were former AK members (or find out which if any of AK daughter organizations they were part of).--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  03:24, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

text: Unsolved since 2009. Xx236 (talk) 08:51, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: AK involvement?

message: * Copyedit - prose and grammar are particularly bad
* Map needed
* More pictures would be good, at the moment there is only the pic of the memorial.
Chaosdruid (talk) 02:16, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Attention needed

message: * Copyedit - tackled grammar, spelling and sentence fragments.
* I think it needs more structure and organization by an expert in this subject. 
Dkon 23:04, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Structure and organization

message: context, perhaps?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.26.68.238 (talk) 20:51, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  volhynia massacres ua-pl 

message: The Ukrainian monument is hardly visible. Xx236 (talk) 09:05, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proportions of the pictures
Talk:Isothermal bulk modulus

message: "The isothermal bulk modulus leaves much to be understood by the human mind, considering it is belived to operate on a level of physics deeper than currently comprehensible via Quantum Physics."
Huh? 199.90.6.26 12:32, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Questionable Sentence

message: I'm trying to figure this out:  The unit of the Isothermal bulk modulus would be Pa, and if you applied that pressure, then F/A = B, so V = ΔV, so the material would collapse to a single point, or change to a different material, which would presumably then be able to withstand higher pressures (or maybe hit a point where it's impossible to keep the material cool enough)
Or is this supposed to work only for very small values of ΔV, and should really be a derivative?
RandomP 00:39, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unit
Talk:Edward Orton

message: Edward J. Orton, Sr. is the same man, however, his middle name may not have existed. Two articles have been composed on one man due to uncertainty surrounding his name.  Ironclad proof (such as his death certificate) may contain his middle name (if one ever existed).  Superslum 12:32, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

message: :well, at minimum, "Sr." needs to identify this Edward Orton from his son, Edward J. Orton Jr.. Stuph 16:04, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Yolanda Vargas Dulché

message: Wasn't this woman the writer of the Memín Pinguín comic books? Or was that perhaps a different Dulché?
What the H does "magestical" mean???!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.16.57.250 (talk) 16:11, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:North Dallas

message: The geographical definitions of North Dallas *really* needs work, anyone with information please contact me.  drumguy8800 - speak 12:40, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definitions 

message: This is what makes wikipedia so fucking 1984ish, you just make shit up out of thin air and act as if its fact.  Yeah I have potty mouth, who cares, at least I'm not making shit up and selling it as an encyclopedia.  if you have any intergrity at all you'll delete this nonsense of an article.
: First of all you seriously need to calm down.  Second, did you ever stop to think that maybe your defintion of "North Dallas" is not the only possible defintion?  I have not reverted your edits, because I don't know one way or the another - however, your attitude makes me seriously doubt the accuracy of your edits. --ThaddeusB (talk) 06:12, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Although I hate to concur with anything said with such stunningly aggressive ignorance by someone who hides behind an anonymous IP address, I do tend to agree that independent cities (such as Addison and Richardson) should not be categorized as "neighborhoods" of North Dallas. However, despite all the vitriol, a glance at the map at http://maps.dallascityhall.com/ confirms that the city of Dallas does indeed extend into Collin and Denton Counties. This does not come as a surprise to me, as I've lived in the Collin County section of the City of Dallas for more than 25 years. HMishkoff (talk) 15:46, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: STOP MAKING SHIT UP, LOSERS
Talk:Catherine Cornaro

message: I've added a note on Pietro Bembo's Gli Asolani, because I think this is too important for it not to get a mention.  Also, I have described her as the "Daugher of the Venetian Republic", although I don't know the exact form of words (ie it might actually be "Daugher of the Republic of Venice") or when this happened.  Also tidied it up with a few section headings.
--SoniaUK 12:41, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You mean it should be Catarina Cornaro? That is kind of odd. I think that's just how the article was created and no one ever bothered to change it. Adam Bishop (talk) 02:58, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Yes, I do mean she should be called by her full and original and correct name.  I don't know how to modify text in that introductory section because it doesn't have an 'edit' point.  If someone could do it that would be appreciated.  PRC 07 (talk) 10:37, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Caterina Cornaro please

message: Cyprus/Larnaca is the honorary guest for the Festa della Sensa week in Venice, 2010 May 11-16 and there will be exhibitions and a conference dedicated to the 500th anniversary of Catherine Cornaro's passing away. 91.82.32.148 (talk) 20:35, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Half a millenium 

message: Why did Venice need to destroy the titles of Jerusalem and Armenia, if they didn't own them anyways? --YOMAL SIDOROFF-BIARMSKII (talk) 22:55, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jerusalem & Armenia
Talk:Neo Geo Battle Coliseum

message: This is not true.  I play NBC on my PS3 all the time and those two are never there.  I'm removing it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.115.8.77 (talk) 00:24, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: John Crawly and Franco Bash?
Talk:¿Quién es el señor López?

message: Who says that it was widely distributed? this is a "propaganda" film.
Propaganda is not the appropiate word for this article. Such a word guides people into thinking this is an effort made by the government, such statement is false. Left the article with only "documentary" on it, if a word has to be used it should be "anti-propaganda".
OK, who signs the above statement?
I was the person adding the word propaganda to the reference.  I watched the documentary and believe it to be propaganda for AMLO.  Propaganda does not have to come from the government or be of negative connotation.  Propaganda is information destined to change the point of view of the audience towards the point of view of the person generating it.   All political campaigns are propaganda.   If you honestly think this "documentary" is not part of a political campaign then we shouldn't even be discussing this. Schicchi 00:47, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Annie Crummer

message: Discography is not complete. --Kylenano 12:46, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:SOFIXIT.  Esradekan Gibb  "Talk" 09:42, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Southern Front (Soviet Union)

message: Stalingrad Front redirects here, to Soviet Southern Front, and this article has a link for Stalingrad Front.  This redundance should be fixed.  omnijohn 21:48, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: redirect
Talk:Tsuzuki-ku, Yokohama

message: Planning to put a table on the top right to make this look consistent with other wards in Yokohama. Greenw47 12:48, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

message: I will remove some less notable or unsourced events from the list and put them here. Feelfree to discuss. I have rough criteria in mind, but typing them would be too long. The years are missing from the copied elements
* Lala Port Yokohama
* Shopping Town Aitai 
* Lulala Kohoku 
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.23.5.48 (talk) 12:57, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Shoppingmall
Talk:Are You There God? It's Me, Jesus

message: Doesnt that book deal with the girls first period? that should be mentioned in the trivia section.--Atticus2020 06:11, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And if you can't find a cite, it's best not to add it. Alastairward (talk) 14:31, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Are You There, God? It's Me, Margaret]]

message: Cites and/or relevance?
* The title of this episode is a reference to the 1970 book Are You There God? It's Me, Margaret by Judy Blume.
* The melody which plays while Jesus and Stan discuss the nature of prayer is the tune to the song "Onward, Christian Soldiers".
*God's line "Look apon me, and know me" is a reference to the Spirit of Christmas Past in A Christmas Carol
* The boys read Women Who Run With the Wolves. This book also makes a small appearance in BASEketball, a film that both Trey Parker and Matt Stone starred in.
Alastairward (talk) 14:33, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably, Yowie's are a bit more humanoid in appearance according to the link.Alastairward (talk) 08:07, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uncited references 

message: The 2nd opening sentence should read "...the then-nearing end of the second 'popular' millennium, A.D."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.191.11.59 (talk) 08:50, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Millenum Reference 
Talk:Spherical model

message: This article should really be moved to a different title, although I'm not sure which one would be best at the moment. Was this precisely the terminology used in the original formulation? --HappyCamper 07:16, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "Spherical Model" is perfectly clear to me. It is a well known model (known by the name Spherical Model) in Stat. Mech. and I immediately understood what the article was about when I saw the title. If there is a conflict with other articles you could e.g. add "Statistical Mechanics" to the title, but I wouldn't modify the words "Spherical Model". Count Iblis 12:24, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  New article title
Talk:Stord

message: "The climate on Stord is rainy, but ther can also be a lot of sun sometimes too. At wintertime there is rarely mutch snow, and the temperature is around 0°C (about 30°F). At sumertime the temperature is between 20°C to 40°C."
The last sentence seems wrong to me. Having lived in Stord for more than 20 years, I have experienced 40°C maybe 1 or 2 times, and less than 10°C in summer many times. Is it possible to find official statistics that we can link to, or should the sentence be removed? Ahy1 12:57, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As noone has come up with real climate data, I have removed the text. Ahy1 16:20, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Climate 

message: "In addition to the southern part of the Stord island, the municipality includes the islands of Huglo, Stordøya og Føyno."
I don't really see the point in this link, and i suggest we remove it. CrazyChip 22:03, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree. These articles could (and probably should) be created, and these red links offer an incentive to do so. __meco 08:09, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oky, i can agree to that(after browsing thru some link guidelines, etc..) but i still think the name is confusing. Being norwgian i can understand that the name "Stordøya" means Stord island, but it's not actually called "Stordøya". Wouldn't it be better to link this to "Stord (island)" insted of a loosly used norwegian term for the island.? CrazyChip 10:28, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps. There are still quite a few paradoxes with regards to Norwegian place names around. __meco 10:40, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to Stordøya. 

message: I am wondering if there are any reliable sources that can confirm this; it could be an interesting addition to the article. The "biggest Nynorsk city in the world" is at least something the city itself claims to be.. There are municipalities like Fjell just outside Bergen that have a greater population than Stord;  but Fjell does not have city status, and a lot of the pupils in Fjell do not have Nynorsk as their preferred language form, contrary to Stord. --Harald Khan  Ճ 10:55, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biggest Nynorsk city? 

message: Stord municipality also has status as a city by the municipality council after the Norwegian law for cities was changed in 1996 I think it was, meaning municipalities with more than 5000 people and a central urban area could legally call itself a city. Although Leirvik is the defined "town" on Stord, the council quite controversily named the whole municipality a city, meaning it has status as a urban municopality/city municipality (not sure about the English definition there, in Norwegian it's bykommune). Shouldn't this be pointed out somewhere in the article? Per Norwegian definition the whole municipality is then a city, and that's how it's seen in norway now (Newspapers and weather forecast sites and so on), with leirvik as the centre of the city.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alundy95 (talk • contribs) 20:21, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Urban municipality/city municipality