Talk:Gish

message: Am I the only one who thinks that the display of the Christgau rating is very misleading?  It looks like he only gave it one star (presumably out of 5), but in reality, his * is intended to mean "honorable mention."  (see: http://www.robertchristgau.com/xg/bk-cg90/grades-90s.php) BlackberryLaw 19:19, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree; a couple of words is hardly a "review" anyway. Link being removed. Masebrock (talk) 03:49, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  If there is a problem with the notability or relevance of Christgau's reviews, it should probably be taken up over at Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums.  They explicitly mention him in the list of good, notable reviewers. Reviews of his containing no text at all have been used many times in Featured Articles, including Adore.  Now, I do agree that his rating scale is a little odd, but that's how he's chosen to do it so that's how his ratings are presented.  It may also be of interest to check out the full text over at Template:Review-Christgau.  I am replacing the review. 66.93.12.46 (talk) 06:55, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Surely the notability of the review, not the reviewer, is what should matter here? He probably wrote this in five minutes, maybe without ever hearing the album. If it is to be kept, a note saying that he hasn't marked it out of 5 has to be included. Otherwise, the Pumpkins and Cristgau both probably have a libel case against us--MartinUK (talk) 21:33, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Christgau rating

message: All song titles serve as redirects to this album, have their own pages, or have been placed at the appropriate disambiguation pages. Godlord2 20:03, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, correct me if I'm wrong, but i dont think Snail has been done. IDISLIKEcaugette 09:41, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nevermind, just made a redirect for it now IDISLIKEcaugette 09:45, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: This album is connected

message: According to this article there is going to be a pre-Gish/Gish box set, tentatively coming late 2008. StevePrutz (talk) 14:39, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Box set? 

message: I have a cassette version with catalogue number HUTMCX 2 (and the number 7243 8 39663 4 9) - I assume this is a UK release, but is not listed in the article. 91.107.122.63 (talk) 22:33, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmmm, I suggest you check Discogs for that information. I actually have a promo copy of Siamese Dream.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clcng (talk • contribs) 13:50, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release history 

message: Since Allmusic have changed the syntax of their URLs, 1 link(s) used in the article do not work anymore and can't be migrated automatically. Please use the search option on http://www.allmusic.com to find the new location of the linked Allmusic article(s) and fix the link(s) accordingly, prefereably by using the  template. If a new location cannot be found, the link(s) should be removed. This applies to the following external links:
* http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=A1e63mpz39f6o
--CactusBot (talk) 19:00, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead external links to Allmusic website – January 2011 

message: Using this space to list sources to use. --Andy Walsh (talk) 22:23, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: At my previous company I had access to the Factiva database, and I remember finding 1991 Gish reviews in Chicago Tribune and Chicago Sun Times. Also, this book looks useful, and note that Spin and other music mags have put their entire archives up on Google Books.—indopug (talk) 05:47, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I never found that bio all that useful, which is why I never used it for the band article. WesleyDodds (talk) 06:52, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  Do you have it? I don't mind buying it even if just for the odd fact. --Andy Walsh (talk) 18:20, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improvement 

message: Some of the section headings I added were removed and things moved around. I was following the model of some more recent album FA's such as Silent Alarm. I like the "Commercial" and "Critical" subheadings because they nicely delineate chart performance from written reviews. Accolades was meant to contain awards, of which there are admittedly not many. --Andy Walsh (talk) 16:44, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess the reason the sub-headings were removed is that there isn't much more than a paragraph or two to say about each of those things (critical, commercial and awards). So a single, undivided section might be better for this particular article.—indopug (talk) 07:34, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: That's pretty much it. Don't split things up until you have to; that allows you to ensure the prose flows better, too. WesleyDodds (talk) 07:45, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yeah, makes sense. I guess I'm in the habit of "outlining" so I have the ideal article structure in mind, but I should probably expand first and add the headings later. --Andy Walsh (talk) 15:38, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  TOC 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Gish. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121111151729/http://charts.org.nz/showitem.asp?interpret=The+Smashing+Pumpkins&titel=Gish&cat=a to http://charts.org.nz/showitem.asp?interpret=The+Smashing+Pumpkins&titel=Gish&cat=a
*Added  tag to http://www.riaa.com/goldandplatinumdata.php?resultpage=1&table=SEARCH_RESULTS&action=&title=gish&artist=Smashing%20Pumpkins&format=&debutLP=&category=&sex=&releaseDate=&requestNo=&type=&level=&label=&company=&certificationDate=&awardDescription=&catalogNo=&aSex=&rec_id=&charField=&gold=&platinum=&multiPlat=&level2=&certDate=&album=&id=&after=&before=&startMonth=1&endMonth=1&startYear=1958&endYear=2009&sort=Artist&perPage=25
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:01, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified