lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Nana Kitade

message: nana kiade wanted to be a singer and she is a the best singer I bet.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.248.148.233 (talk) 02:33, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Talkpage for Nana Kitade

message: I suggest that there be some cleanup made to this article. The English here is scary and at some times purely atrocious. A day without laughter is a day wasted (talk) 15:27, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup
Talk:List of 6teen episodes

message: I'm glad that this article was created. The main page for 6teen had grown very large. In the future, contributors to the 6teen articles of Wikipedia should describe info about individual episodes here. --Matt0401 21:18, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: When is a new season/episode going to air? It's already November and no sign of a new episode coming up. Anyone know when a new episode is going to air??? A-3PO (talk) 23:53, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Season/Episode 

message: Should this article remain part of Project Nick being that it no longer airs on Nickelodeon, but on Cartoon Netwark? -Fall Of Darkness (talk) 01:28, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Project Nick? 

message: nobody knows about season 4, it's not jen and jonsey leaving, it's nikki. somebody please fix this. link to info about season 4:   —Preceding unsigned comment added by BerthaTheBuilder (talk • contribs) 09:25, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It appears that a lot of the episode info on these Season Four episodes of 6teen that were obtained from TV IV, as you said, were all speculative edits by one editor who made up his "information" about each episode on the spot without verifiable proof (and, in a few cases, made up episode titles and info after "Bye Bye Nikki? (2)" that may or may not even exist). All those TV IV articles in question have been dealt with to remove all speculation or incorrect info. Creativity-II (talk) 03:47, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  season 4 

message: What's the deal here? Are they ever going to start showing new episodes on CN or is this just an iTunes thing now? Sirius85 (talk) 18:01, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: US airing
Template talk:Western Sahara conflict

message: Template rearranged. wikima 11:07, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

message: What? The edit summary "The topic of the defection of top leaders is more important than 'Greater Morocco'" is outlandish for two reasons: 1.) Greater Morocco was the impetus for the Sahara conflict, and 2.) to have a list of defectors from Polisario, without a link to Polisario in the first place is POV at best. -Justin (koavf)·T·C·M 22:55, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greater Morocco and Polisario defection 

message: Because there is no source connecting the label "Greater Morocco" to the Western Shara conflict, I deleted the article from the template.S710 13:31, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greater Morocco 

message: Why? Why would you delete these intifadas? They are relevant to the Sahara conflict, aren't they? Would you delete the Palestinian intifadas from a "Israel-Palestine conflict" template? -Justin (koavf)·T·C·M 15:55, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intifadas 

message: Why? Jalil, why do you keep on deleting relevant articles? And renaming one of them? And keep the Zemla Intifada, but deleting the Independence Intifada, even though the latter is more germane? -Justin (koavf)·T·C·M 16:18, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Which relevant articles?. Greater Morocco? This is inexistent in Morocco as a concept. How can it be treated as a fact?. Zemla uprising is the correct wording. Actually the Zemla sit-in would more appropriate if you read about the details of what happened at the Zemla. There were more riots in Algeria in 2007 than in the Sahara. I never heard anyone talking about intifadas in Algeria. So forget about making the sporadic small disturbances as part of the template.--A Jalil 18:57, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sit-in? About a dozen protesters were killed and several wounded; that's hardly a sit-in. Greater Morocco is relevant, regardless of whether or not you've heard of it or Algerian intifadas or anything else. These are relevant articles and you are deleting them. Also, you completely ignored a simple and direct question that I asked you. -Justin (koavf)·T·C·M 19:15, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleting and renaming 

message: The map is not really adapted to historical uses, i replaced it with a map from the beginnings of the past century. Regards. -Dzlinker (talk) 19:40, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  map on the box
Talk:Deutschland-class cruiser

message: This is a article about the Deutschland class or about yours enemys and "how the Deutschland is insignificant against British navy"?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.189.117.10 (talk) 16:12, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biased article 

message: Seeing as the Notes "section" is a massive eyesore, is there some way the information could be worked into the paragraph, so it resembles a coherent article rather than a post-it?  Super Jedi Droid 06:04, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notes? 

message: Due to their heavy armament of six 28 cm (11 in) guns, the British began referring to the vessels as "pocket battleships"
This description of the phrase "pocket battleship" could use some explanation. At least I cannot make the connection between pockets and heavy armaments.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.152.241.77 (talk) 21:31, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The press used this term to show how the Germans had violated the limitations of the treaty - in other words, they had hid battleships in their "pocket" because their hull length would allow them to "fit" - ready to be pulled out and used.   HammerFilmFan (talk) 01:48, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: More or less correct; but it is an allusion to "pocket pistol", implying that is was "smaller but just as deadly". ~Eric F 184.76.225.106 (talk) 03:35, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

text: it wasn't/isn't just the British that referred to them as "pocket battleships", the US newsreels, newspapers, etc. also used that term (presumably Canada, etc. too). ~Eric F 184.76.225.106 (talk) 03:29, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Did you never hear or see foreign media incorporating a term/nickname suggested/developed by another countries media? --Denniss (talk) 11:11, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pocket Battleship? 

message: Two-boy crewed, quite exacting "pocket-pocket battleship" from 1940, hi-res downloadable:
https://fortepan.hu/en/photos/?id=264329
Apparently she belonged to H.jugend or its hungarian equivalent, the so-called Levente movement. 94.21.229.41 (talk) 22:10, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pocket-pocket battleship photo.
Talk:Team Durham

message: Page creator removed wikify and notability tags without adding any new content other than a link. Article appears to be non-notable and fails the Google test. Rather than putting up for AfD, which I think would result in its deletion, I will flag it to be merged with Durham University. --mtz206 11:27, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Warhammer 40,000/Style

message: When I've added references to articles, I've tended to use something pretty close to the Harvard referencing style, whereas others have used footnotes. I think it would be nice if we used just one style throughough all articles, but I'm open as to which. Any views welcome. Cheers --Pak21 11:28, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Referencing style
Talk:Aharon Davidi

message: Started as classical copy/paste-masterpiece from http://www.vfi-usa.org/VFI%20Newsletter/VFI-Connection-2006-1.pdf. by StevePlotkin (see his works under Volunteers for Israel, copied from Sar-El), this article should now match our quality standards.
--Feliks 11:42, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 
Talk:Imperial and Royal Highness

message: I have removed a text that was in the article, because it really is very random, I'll paste it here to keep, maybe after reformatting it can be included in the main article again. Grand Duchess Marie Alexandrovna of Russia, following her marriage to The Prince Alfred, later Duke of Edinburgh and later Duke of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha, the second son of Queen Victoria, used the style. As a daughter of a Russian Emperor, Marie was styled Imperial Highness from birth. Upon her marriage, her father Emperor Alexander II's insistence that his daughter be styled "Her Imperial Highness" and have precedence over the then Princess of Wales (the former Princess Alexandra of Denmark) infuriated Queen Victoria. The Queen insisted that the style "Her Royal Highness" Marie Alexandrovna acquired upon marriage, should always precede the style "Her Imperial Highness," which was hers by birth. For her part, the new Duchess of Edinburgh apparently resented the fact that the Princess of Wales, who was the daughter of King Christian IX of Denmark, took precedence over her, the daughter of the Russian Tsar. After the marriage, Marie was varyingly referred to as Her Royal Highness, Her Royal and Imperial Highness, and Her Imperial and Royal Highness. Gryffindor 11:49, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it is largely irrelevant and not in keeping with the general style of the rest of the articles in this series. Charles 18:45, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Carolina chickadee

message: A photo by Jim Stasz was added from the USGS/NPWRC web site. One has to watch the images on that site--not all are taken by US govt. employees--many are reproduced on that site with permission, and I believe that is true for that photo. See this page, which is basically their copyright statement:
:This page is a composite of the efforts of many people who have donated photographs, songs, and other information. The photographs, videos and songs are used with permission of the authors. They have provided permission for viewing images and playing the sound files in conjunction with use of this website, but permission must be obtained for other uses of the files. Please do not copy photographs, videos or songs without their permission!
See also the list of photographers, which lists Jim Stasz as a private individual. (Even a USGS employee might have taken a photo on their own time and then allowed its use.)
That's not a great photo, at any rate. I've replaced it with a similar photo of the bird (my own), and this should be replaced when a better one, with clear licensing, is found. (I've got a pair nesting in my yard this spring, so maybe I'll be able to get some.) Apologies if I've misinterpreted the licensing information on the USGS site, or if permission was otherwise obtained. I saw no indication of this on the upload information. --Cotinis 11:49, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Carolina Chickadee photo 

message: Why is the last paragraph (about mating and hybrids) exactly the same in text (prose verbatim) as the reported source? -128.103.10.111 (talk) 15:56, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last paragraph
Talk:Apostolic Church of South Africa – Apostle Unity

message: Hello Kerkman,
you write that some information is not correct. Which one? Pls specify! Thx. Taurus65 (talk) 17:37, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Hello, I have been in Cape Town 2 weeks ago and attended a service. I agree with Manofmyth that the amendments of the text are very "one direction". Should be neutralised and subsidised under a new paragraph "critics" instead of "administration". Would be great if someone could give more info. --Taurus65 (talk) 22:13, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

message: Does anyone know if there is a reason that the Rs are capitalized?  If that is how it is used by them then it is fine but it shouldn't be like that for emphasis.Leefkrust22 (talk) 00:04, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Four Rs 

message: I am not 100% sure but it seems that the section under Administration might be a copyright violation. Googling the paragraph brings up the above mentioned URL. The text itself also shows that there might be a copy and paste, i.e. "This is in line with comments published previously on this website but deleted since" ShiningWolf (talk) 18:56, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violiation 
Talk:Ryd, Linköping

message: I removed the copyvio template as the "source" of the text is stated to be a Wikipedia mirror of Ryd, which this text was split off from. I even noted the contributors of this text in my first edit summary, so that should not be a problem either. //Essin (talk) 22:08, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio? Don't think so
Talk:The Smell of Apples

message: In the first paragraph it is stated the books were published in 1995 but the infobox says 1993. Any clarification as to which year is the correct year? Am currently translating this page and it would be helpful to have the correct date (both dates appear online aswell, as far as I can tell).
Leiservampir (talk) 02:07, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, have just noticed two different ages are mentioned, first 10 years old then 11 (concerning Marnus). Leiservampir (talk) 02:11, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Publication date? 

message: i do not speak very good english so i am not able to complete this article but somebody should do because the article only shows one aspect of the novel. this novel is much more complicated and it deals with much more than only child abuse
its about how the system of apartheid influences peoples lives 
child abuse is only one aspect that goes along with marnus' father's attitude which is based on the apartheid system and the article also should speak about the historical and political background, especially concerning the scenes with the general from chile
so please, anyone who read the book should complete this article!
:Hi-if you write what you want to add on this talk page I will edit the english and add to the article. Tony 09:48, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  this article is not complete 

message: Was this not originally "Die Reuk van Appels"? --Slashme 08:51, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added it, but do not know if it was a first/simultaneous/later publication.Tony 09:47, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  English originally or translated?
Talk:Mariusz Jop

message: Here's what the Polish Wikipedia has to say about the man: I'm no expert on the Polish language, so I'll leave it here. --Wonderfool 12:31, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Dead Connection

message: Weapons include:
*Machine Gun
*Shotgun
*Automatic
*Revolver
The player gets to choose from 4 characters (Philip, James, Eddie and Gary).
Items grant health or bonus points.
The amount of enemies is increased with (nearly) every stage (multiplayer in brackets):
*stage 1: 30 (50)
*stage 2: 40 (60)
*stage 3: 50 (70)
*stage 4: 60 (80)
*stage 5: 60 (80)
*stage 6: 65 (85)
*stage 7: 65 (85)
*stage 8: 70 (90)
There are 8 levels. The last three enemies of every stage are a boss and his two bodyguards. The 8th level holds four bosses (1 at the start, 1 at the end, 2 in the middle)
Although KLOV states the game was for up to 4 players, I've only found 2-player versions of the game in accordance with what can be found at MAWS. --elias.hc 13:23, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/May 23, 2006

message: This paragraph seems to me to be very awkward to read.  The first sentence does not make sense as it's been formed from two different sentences in the article's lead that have been stuck together incorrectly.  The next sentences are slightly overwhelming as they are simply a barrage of dates and facts that seem to have been crammed in at the expense of the elaboration in the lead of the article; I end up skipping most of the paragraph as I simply can't read all that at once.
Also, the apostrophe from 'mid-1800's' should be removed to make it mid-1800s (I omitted the inverted commas for clarity).
I don't mean to be overly critical but I think that paragraph could do with a slight rework.  81.157.113.170 12:36, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Errors
Talk:AeroVironment RQ-14 Dragon Eye

message: ----
----
This makes no sense:
"# Cruising speed: 65 km/h (40 mph)
# Battery Endurance: 1 hour
# Range: 5 km (3.1 mi)
# Transmission Range: 10 km (6.2 mi)"
What meaning has "range" in this context? It should either be about 65 km (cruising speed x endurance) or 10 km (transmission range). "5 km" seems to make no sense at all.
Lastdingo (talk) 19:07, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That data is attributed to GlobalSecurity.org, which includes quite a bit of speculation in their reports of current systems, IMO.  The manufacturer of Dragon Eye only claims a speed of 35 km/h, endurance of 45-60 minutes, and a transmission range of "up to" 5 km with a clear line-of-sight. 208.29.186.172 (talk) 21:22, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Bell AH-1 Cobra

message: Greetings,
I recently tried to access one of the references cited in this article (World Air Forces 2013)...the link looks like it once led to a PDF, but currently leads elsewhere on the flightglobal.com page. Is this source behind a paywall? Or is it simply no longer available? Given that it's cited 8 times in the article, should we make sure it (or an alternative source) are readily available?
Cheers! Skyraider1 (talk) 20:53, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Just because you can no longer find it on the internet doesnt stop it being a valid source, World Air Forces 2013 was also published in Flight International so it does exist in published form in libraries and other depositories. No requirement on wikipedia for sources to be online, thanks. MilborneOne (talk) 21:18, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I suspect that the recent entry from an IP about Kenya is just a copy and paste from the entry above and unlikley to be in that source, thanks. MilborneOne (talk) 21:22, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

text: It's not listed in WAF 2017. I think the IP just copied another entry that was cited, and changed the text to Kenya. - BilCat (talk) 00:30, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, glad others reached the same conclusion I did about the IP edit. Next time something like that comes up, I'll ping someone with access to WAF (or get my own account). Thanks! Skyraider1 (talk) 11:48, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  World Air Forces 2013 source not readily available 

message: I think, the term "Kurdish insurgents" as used in this article is problematic. My understanding is that "insurgent" is the term used by Turkish politicians, Kurdish politicians will probably use other terms: ;-)
My suggestion is to make this sentence more neutral, e.g. by using Kurdish forces or Kurdish positions. Philippschaumann (talk) 13:31, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know about Turkey specifically, but in most aircraft articles dealing with such situations, the government sources tend to call such opposition forces "rebels", "terrorists", and the like. In those cases, "insurgents" is the more neutral term, and why it's used here. Simply calling them "Kurdish forces" is probably going too far the other way, though not as far as terms like "freedom fighters". BilCat (talk) 21:32, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kurdish insurgents  
Talk:Norton & Sons

message: This article reads like an advertisement, and was probably written by someone connected to Norton & Sons. 202.89.159.247 08:13, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertisement 
Talk:Marine Corps Air Station Iwakuni

message: Would like to propose moving airport topic into a separate article. It is not part of the USMC air station, but is a separate civilian facility that shares a runway. - Brianhe (talk) 06:29, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Iwakuni Kintaikyo Airport 
Talk:List of United States Marine Corps aviation installations

message: This article duplicates info on List of United States Marine Corps installations. There is nothing so special about the MCASs that they should be kept seperate from the other installations. bahamut0013♠♣ 23:36, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've gone ahead and turned the article into a redirect. bahamut0013♠♣ 03:02, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Tustin Legacy, Tustin, California

message: Moved Marine Corps Air Station Tustin back to its own article.Awotter (talk) 21:53, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Move

message: Should all areas be given in consistent units, such as acres, so that they are all directly comparable? Right now, they differ between acres and square feet. DAK4Blizzard (talk) 22:04, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Units of Area
Talk:Isabella of Portugal, Queen of Castile

message: If this needs renaming, a possibility is "Isabel de Portugal-Aviz" or "Isabella of Portugal-Aviz" ObRoy 13:14, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The little picture showing Isabella praying is not THIS Isabella of Portugal, but her aunt Isabella of Portugal, duchess of Burgundy (wife of Philip the Good). By the way, we can clearly see the arms of Burgundy on the wall, behind her and her two sons...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.226.245.146 (talk) 00:54, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong illustration
Talk:Shadow King

message: The intro paragraph suggests that Amahl Farouk isn't the shadow king's real name. Is this the case?Shinji nishizono 23:41, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Real Name?

message: "They were planning to dethrone King Edward of England and replace him with a fascist ruler in favor of the Führer"
Given that Edward got on rather well with Hitler and spent large amounts of time with Wallis Simpson socialising with him...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.145.252.66 (talk) 13:11, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Kind of funny