Talk:Spice Up Your Life

message: This redirect is protected from editing because it has been the target of cut-and-paste move vandalism. Mel Etitis  (Μελ Ετητης) 13:24, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, you are correct. Winnermario 21:21, 17 September 2005 (UTC)

text: The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was no consensus for moving. --Dijxtra 11:44, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Heading

message: Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
*Oppose, "up", while short like "a" or "the", is not an article like those words and should be capitalized. Recury 17:50, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Have you seen this? Please read the naming conventions. -Justin (koavf)·T·C·M 15:23, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: There are no sources for any of the statements in the article.  Chart positions, trajectories, sales data, etc. all need sources.  Also, many statements are quite slanted.  Things like "the song received an overwhelmingly positive initial reaction" and the fact that the video is supposedly "considered by many to rank among the Spice Girls' best" is just not very encyclopedic, not to mention weasely.  For such a long page, considering it's for a song, i'm surprised that there are no sources, and that's it's been left in this condition for so long.  SKS2K6 09:10, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources and cleanup needed

message: A quick search on iTunes shows that this song has been covered by the following: Little Voices, Spice Squirrels, The Hit Crew and The Twang (Curiously enough, a country artist), among others. Is this worth noting in the article? Retro Agnostic (talk) 03:02, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Is this notable??

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Spice Up Your Life. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.disqueenfrance.com/fr/page-259376.xml?year=1997
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:51, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 10 external links on Spice Up Your Life. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1434517/update-spice-girls-set-dates-album-movie-mandela.jhtml
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0%2C%2C290134%2C00.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/pop-albums-the-spice-girls-spiceworld-virgin-cdv-2850-1292532.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nytimes.com/1997/11/04/arts/critic-s-choice-pop-cd-s-take-a-little-sass-add-sunshine.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1430662/spice-girls-give-elton-tumble.jhtml
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090924015932/http://www.bpi.co.uk/certifiedawards/search.aspx to http://www.bpi.co.uk/certifiedawards/search.aspx
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1434499/spice-girls-go-payperview.jhtml
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/4719222/The-Spice-Girls-wrap-up-Christmas.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.lt24online.com.ar/hot100_97.htm/showitem.asp%3Ds
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150208230504/http://www.hitlistan.se/netdata/ghl002.mbr/lista?liid=43&dfom=19970001&newi=0&height=420&platform=Win32&browser=MSIE&navi=no&subframe=Mainframe to http://www.hitlistan.se/netdata/ghl002.mbr/lista?liid=43&dfom=19970001&newi=0&height=420&platform=Win32&browser=MSIE&navi=no&subframe=Mainframe
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:19, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Spice Up Your Life. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0%2C%2C290134%2C00.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070626000000/http://www.riaa.com/goldandplatinumdata.php?table=SEARCH to http://www.riaa.com/goldandplatinumdata.php?table=SEARCH
*Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6Hg2f2BlH?url=http://www.infodisc.fr/S_Certif_Or.php?debut=400 to http://www.infodisc.fr/S_Certif_Or.php?debut=400
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:05, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Spice Up Your Life. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120206071212/http://www.brits.co.uk/britstv/1998-british-video-all-saints to http://www.brits.co.uk/britstv/1998-british-video-all-saints
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.lt24online.com.ar/hot100_97.htm/
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.rt100.ro/topul-anului-1997.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:55, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: and : You've both now been warned for 3RR. You both seem to feel there is some shame in being the one to start discussion on the article's talk page. Well, shucks, I'll take the shame for both of you.
Feel free to discuss the issue here. I don't care who did what to whom or how horrible the other editor is. Discuss content. - SummerPhDv2.0 16:21, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Apologies, I never meant to be disruptive or engage in an edit war. , that's enough. PNG is the preferred file format for album/single covers by the vast majority of Wikipedia music editors, as it's a lossless format where the image retains its quality. While there's no guideline explicitly favoring PNG covers over JPG ones, there's no guideline (not that I know of) that forbids you to replace JPGs with PNGs. (MOS:HOTLINK does state that PNG is "useful for storing graphics that contain text, line art, or other images with sharp transitions", even if it doesn't directly addresses album covers.) JPG covers are constantly replaced with PNG covers, regardless of how long the original JPG file was used for, and no one bats an eyelid. Replacing lower-quality images with higher-quality ones is not a controversial matter that requires consensus. Perhaps if I were uploading a completely different cover art, I could see how this could be an issue. (By the way, the "Spice Up Your Life" cover I uploaded is the one that was used for most releases of the single, while the one you reuploaded was only used for the UK CD 2.) You had never contributed a single edit to a Spice Girls article, then all of a sudden you simply reuploaded and restored the original JPG file without so much as providing an edit summary. When reverted (by both  and I), your only argument was that the original JPG cover had been used "over a decade" and that such change required consensus (even though you're the only making an issue out of it, and you weren't even the uploader of the original JPG). I've already explained my reasoning for replacing the JPG covers with high-quality PNGs. What's your reason to restore JPG covers of visibly inferior quality? How is that helpful or constructive? Not to mention that you've had your account for a couple of months and you already have an extensive history of edit warring. snapsnap (talk) 18:30, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit war