lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ten Little Indians (1989 film)

message: It was obviously a female hand and forearm that pushed the Colonel.  Was that a way the audience would assume it was one of the two woman? 2603:7000:9C00:3127:DD26:37EE:D36:DFE8 (talk) 14:40, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Hand that pushed the Colonel
Talk:A. O. Smith

message: A.O.Smith has another division called A.O.Smith electric products company (EPC for short) which is not listed in this article. The EPC headquarter lies in Tipp City, Ohio.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by RexWang (talk • contribs) 03:23, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  A.O.Smith - EPC division 

message: State Industries was NOT a state-owned enterprise; that was rather its name.  It was a private business, based in Nashville, Tennessee until the early 1960s and then moved to the Nashville exurb of Ashland City, Tennessee.  It was originally known as "State Stove Co." and was often called that; by the time of its move to Ashland City its product line consisted entirely of water heaters, and was one of the originators of the "self cleaning" feature. Its former plant, now owned by A. O. Smith, flooded very badly in the Nashville flood (2010) but has since re-opened. 75.246.12.46 (talk) 23:50, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  State Industries, Inc. 

message: I've started a new version of the article at Talk:A. O. Smith/Temp to replace the one with copyright issues from 2007-11-27 to 2012-09-18.  Non-marketing additions welcome. --Closeapple (talk) 05:04, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite 

message: The statement that this company owns the John Wood brand is in apparent contradiction with the Rheem Manufacturing Company page, which states that that company acquired John Wood in 1931.
Wikimikef (talk) 00:48, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  John Wood brand 

message: * Specific text to be removed: Ajita G. Rajendra (Chairman & CEO)
* Reason for the change: retired 1 May 2020
* References supporting change: https://investor.aosmith.com/node/18726/html https://www.aosmith.com/News/2020-News/Ajita-Rajendra-to-retire-as-executive-chairman-of-A--O--Smith-Corporation/ https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/ajita-rajendra-to-retire-as-executive-chairman-of-a-o-smith-corporation-kevin-wheeler-named-chairman-president-and-chief-executive-officer-301040631.html
* Specific text to be added: Kevin J. Wheeler (Chairman, President & CEO)
* Reason for the change: elevated 1 May 2020
* References supporting change: https://investor.aosmith.com/node/18726/html https://www.aosmith.com/News/2020-News/Ajita-Rajendra-to-retire-as-executive-chairman-of-A--O--Smith-Corporation/ https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/ajita-rajendra-to-retire-as-executive-chairman-of-a-o-smith-corporation-kevin-wheeler-named-chairman-president-and-chief-executive-officer-301040631.html https://www.aosmith.com/About/Leadership/ https://www.aosmith.com/About/Leadership/Kevin-J-Wheeler/
Kwshermach (talk) 22:51, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for the request. For future proposed changes, I encourage you to use a  or  template, so that information like access date, title, publisher, author, etc. is automatically included, and makes it easier to implement the request. SpencerT•C 00:14, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some proposed changes from editor with COI
Talk:Ashendon

message: Hey all, I'm the WikiProject Cities assessor of this article. If feedback is what you want and need, come to my talk page and give me a holler! --Starstriker7(Dime algoor see my works) 02:53, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Muhammad Ali Shah

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources.  Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Diannaa (talk) 21:49, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Bledlow

message: Might be of interest to some. Bledlow Cross. ALFRED MARKS. The Times (London, England), Friday, Sep 24, 1909; pg. 4; Issue 39073.  (530 words) 125.7.50.10 (talk) 03:30, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mention of the Cross in The Times
Talk:535

message: There should be a topic on the "AD540" event (which occurred in AD535). It is a synthesis of data from across the world which seeks to tie all of the disasters and events after the reporting of a catostrophic event (most likely a comet or volcanoe) in 535AD together, claiming that reports in that year from across the globe of adverse weather (like snow in August in China), heavy rain, drought etc and the subsiquent impacts of those conditions (disease, famine, population movements of Turks and Germans, and possibly the rise of Islam) changed the course of history. I understand that it is a subject much discussed, and so should be a Wikipedia article too. 144.32.126.11 (talk) 18:30, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: See Extreme weather events of 535–536. --Mervyn (talk) 12:04, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Can we somehow provide a link to the 538 disambiguation page? 
Some people are totaling up the number of Representatives in the House (435) plus the number in the Senate (100) and looking up 535, when they should be adding 3 more for Washington D.C., thus inadvertently looking to the 535 article by accident. 
| http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/538_%28disambiguation%29</br>
LP-mn (talk) 13:54, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I went ahead and added the "Not to be Confused With" section. LP-mn (talk) 14:01, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  538
Talk:Bradenham, Buckinghamshire

message: Hello! During late June, July and some of August, I'm working on a paid project sponsored by the National Trust to review and enhance coverage of NT sites. You can find the project edits here, as well as a statement and contact details for the National Trust. I am leaving this message when I make a first edit to a page; please do get in touch if you have any concerns. Lajmmoore (talk) 20:35, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  National Trust pilot
Talk:ANSI T1.413 Issue 2

message: "The data frame rate (baud rate) is 4,000 frames per second."  Huh?  Baud is symbols per second, not frames.  How many symbols are sent over T1.413?  -  Theaveng (talk) 18:32, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Right, I think nowdays we would just say the baud rate is 4000 per second. Times 254 subcarriers times 15 bits per subcarrier symbol (3810 bits per baud) equals the 15.24 Mbit/s rate. This is just the modulation, and several more layers (e.g. ATM and an adaption layer, I guess) would be required before one gets to a "packet" or Ethernet frame equivalent, so very different. Needs be explained much better, and with sources. W Nowicki (talk) 23:10, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Baud =/= frames per second

message: What happened to Issue 1???? If nobody objects, we should probably move it to a simpler name ANSI T1.413 since that seems unqiue for these many years. W Nowicki (talk) 23:04, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Obvious question
Talk:Bradwell, Milton Keynes

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Denbigh, Buckinghamshire which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 23:30, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: Along with many clubs low in the pyramid, the OBUFC article is being considered for deletion. For details, see the notification at the top of its article. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 08:16, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old Bradwell United article being considered for deletion
Talk:Ease Gill Caverns

message: Since there's some edit-summary-less reverting going on, just want to point out that:
#There is some difference in usage: Ease Gill vs. Easegill
#Ease Gill seems much more common: 1,410,000 Ghits vs. 625 Ghits
#Edit summaries are our friends
Any objection to leaving the IP's changes in place, and renaming the article Ease Gill cave system?--barneca (talk) 18:35, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ease Gill cave system looks right to me. – ukexpat (talk) 18:47, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ease Gill vs. Easegill 

message: This whole article is confused, torn between "Ease Gill Caverns" used to cover the interconnected cave systems which flow to Leck Beck Head, and "Ease Gill Caverns" which was used to describe the caves associated with Ease Gill itself.
The former is correctly described as having about 75 km of interconnected passages. However, if the article IS about the whole system it would be incorrect to say that the first discovered entrance was Lancaster Hole. The upstream passages of Lost Johns' on Leck Fell, for example, were explored in the nineteenth century and Bull Pot of Witches was well explored by the 1930s.
Lancaster Hole was the first entrance found which led to the passages below Ease Gill, but many other entrances had been explored by 1946. Langcliffe (talk) 12:06, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The first-discovered entrance" 

message: The opening line of the page seems to have been superceded by the opening of the link into the wider Three Counties mega system. Some of the sources cited as saying Ease Gill is longest have been updated to say Three Counties; one cited source hasn't, but doesn't look as if it's being maintained.
Would someone with greater knowledge of the subject like to rewrite the page opening? For example, I don't like to speculate whether we could say "Ease Gill is the major part of the UK's longest system".
Ministry (talk) 13:51, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Longest cave system in Britain?
Talk:Athabasca Falls

message: This is one of the most famous falls in the Rockies & this is its page?  Looks like I'm gonna be doin' some dirty work here; I just don't understand how a feature of this importance could have such a terrible excuse for an article on it.  I guess we should all be glad I came along!  There is some work needed to be done here! AndrewEnns (talk) 22:37, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are you joking? 
Talk:Elbow Falls

message: The coordinates need the following fixes:
 50°52'3.92"N 114°46'43.53"W
70.73.38.227 (talk) 01:21, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Changed, though rounded a little.  — Dispenser 04:58, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error
Talk:HMS Loyal London (1666)

message: This article was formerly very inaccurate. The Loyal London was never a "96-gun First Rate", and that description appears to have been based on a mis-reading of the Colledge book. The ship was built as an 80-gun Second Rate (as described by Lavery, by my own published work,  and by all the archival records of the Admiralty and Navy Board); when commissioned, she was actually armed with 92 guns but never carried more than this and was always a Second Rate. It was the 1670 HMS London that was rebuilt from the remains of the 1666 vessel which was the 96-gun First Rate. I have substantially corrected the article. Rif Winfield (talk) 20:20, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong rating, wrong armament, wrong ship
Talk:FightAIDS@Home

message: When is this grid project expected to be completed?
:Several experiments are already completed, and given some results, please see the project pages. There is still a lot of calculations to be done, please joint the project and donate your free CPU time, so we will all see the results faster. Thank you.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.217.114.60 (talk) 13:23, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Burnham, Buckinghamshire

message: Edited the appearance of the word 'town' in this article to village, as technically Burnham is still a village even though it has been engulfed by Slough somewhat.
:Are you able to provide a reference that states one way or the other?  Because you can guarantee that in a couple of months time someone else will come along and say "this isn't a village, it's a town, obviously!" -- Roleplayer (talk) 17:29, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  local usage is 'village', and this point is touched on in the introduction. I have a vague recollection (but cannot at this point source) that early references are to Burnham as a town, but with the loss of the market to Maidenhead and rerouting of the Bath Road, the terminology changes to village. Room for someone to do some referencing perhaps? Regardless, remember that there is no legal definition of what is a town / village / hamlet in England. Cities are different... Grblundell (talk) 08:46, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Can anyone source that
- Burnham is a dispersed settlement
- Boveney is back in the civil parish
- Egypt, Buckinghamshire is also in the civil parish
These are in the article and currently unsourced, but don't tie up with my understanding. So I'll remove them unless someone can put me right!
Thanks Grblundell (talk) 17:35, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced statements 
Talk:Chesham Bois

message: So both "Chesham" and "Bois" are not trivial to pronounce. Chesham has traditional-versus-"modern". And Bois has the "french way" and the "boys" way. This is obliquely covered by the IPA at the start of the article... could it be made more explicit/simple-minded?
Thanks.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.119.27.27 (talk) 10:13, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 
Talk:Chicheley

message: An interested person is invited to read the Victoria History article cited in the article after Domesday and confirm (or deny) that it supports the information in the article. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 12:18, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  History of the parish
Talk:Creslow

message: The Victoria History of Buckinghamshire: Creslow (under Advowson) reports that the rights to the parish were disputed in 1276 and were confirmed to the Prior at that time, albeit with right to challenge it again. The Knights Templar were suppressed just 31 years in 1307 but the VHoB does not report any further challenge (or could not find any?). If it were in the hands of Templars, a claim would surely have arisen. There is no reason to believe that the Priory was not always a Hospitaler one. We would need solid evidence to say otherwise. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 23:09, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: This online PDF about Creslow Pastures also disputes association with the Templars: http://www.bucksas.org.uk/rob/rob_1_7_255.pdf Joss (talk) 10:39, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. I have deleted the Templars reference as unsubstantiated. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 23:24, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Knights Templar - dubious 
Talk:Cublington

message: Supported. All articles in Wikipedia are supposed to have sources. What might be common knowledge to an original article contributor is not common knowledge to everyone. Unless a source is given people cannot check the veracity of an article for themselves. The inline 'unsourced' tags or an 'unreferenced' banner also alert all Wikipedia editors monitoring the unsourced article categories: one editor might be prompted to find a source and resolve the problem. However, unsourced items cannot be allowed to remain in an article indefinitely. --Kudpung (talk) 16:32, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Reference the above about the removed content concerning the Government rejecting Cublington over Founess for the 3rd London airport. The following extract from the Environment Magazine April 1973 reprinted with permission by Walt Patterson a respected commentator on environmental matters provides the citation to back up the statement.  see Tmol42 (talk) 17:52, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current revision as of 16:49, 30 June 2009 (edit) (undo)Jenuk1985 (talk | contribs)(Rm unsourced)
Talk:Nimbus (British horse)

message: I have never seen this horse referred to as Nimbus V. Should be NimbusTigerboy1966 (talk) 20:09, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: V

message: I have used the Pathe clip as a reference as well as an external link. A bit problematic, I know. The Pathe clip should be watched as Elliott won the race in an "old-fashioned" style. To  modern eyes, the race looks more like an American than a British classic, with the best horses going to the front early on and just slugging it out in the last half mile without any fancy stuff. Tigerboy1966  21:16, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: British Pathe
Talk:Chain transfer

message: n non-radical polymerisations but the page does not state this.
:If you can provide examples, we can add them.  But AFAIK, the term chain transfer is primarily used for radical polymerizations.  It isn't applicable to condensation or ring opening polymerizations.  Cationic?  Also, please sign your contributions. Delmlsfan (talk) 23:54, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: fixed. Delmlsfan (talk) 03:27, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-radical polymerizations? 

message: Article could provide more information on how this theoretical knowledge is applied.  The only notable examples given in the history relate to synthetic rubbers and LDPE.  Surely these kinds of reaction are significant in producing industrial and household chemicals?
yoyo (talk) 19:24, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Applications
Talk:Leo clubs

message: Could someone please explain why was the logo deleted ?
:The logo was removed by an automated bot, apparently the image broke the rules in some fashion. While I am sure the image was appropriate, I guess it was removed because it lacked a fair use rational or a justification as to why it could be freely used on Wikipedia. If you consult the rules concerning the uploading of images on wiki, you will find how to upload the picture and make sure it stays on. Don't worry about this kind of details, it happens all the time, media rules are kinda tricky at first. Youkai no unmei (talk) 19:04, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have now reinstated the logo, with the appropriate infobox and fair use rationale. The logo is reasonably low res, so should suffice under fair use. Somebody might be able to upload another one if they get a chance, unfortunately I could only use bicubic resampling to resize at the moment and it ended up a little jaggy. -- Twistie.man (talk) 09:52, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo Removal 

message: Does anybody have any problems with me removing this section of the article? It is far too specific about the activities of a certain club. Most service organizations do not mention any clubs in their articles unless they are particularly notable (founding club, longest running, etc.). There also seems to be very few individual clubs listed on Wikipedia under separate articles, in fact none in the case of Lions and Leos. As such, I don't feel it is appropriate for this club to be given a separate article. This is an encyclopedia, not a blog or social network. I myself am a Leo club secretary and feel there is no need for club's to be added to Wikipedia on an individual level, nor as part of a larger article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Twistie.man (talk • contribs) 10:44, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leo Club in Malaysia 

message: I would like to add Sub category as Leo Clubs Country wise . It will be very informative for wiki visitors. boomboom 07:28, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding Sub-Category 

message: Could someone please update the information here? The reference given is from 2010 or 2012 or so, and the age range has changed; I believe they now accept Leos (or "Leo-Lions", which I believe is sort of a transitional thing) up to age 35. I thus assume that some of the other information might also be outdated. (Sorry, I'm not much of a Wiki user, so I don't really know how to do it myself!) Kinnery (talk) 20:27, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs updating
Talk:Great Linford

message: Great Linford is just another district of MK, even though it is a historic one one.  It is completely inappropriate to use the standard free-standing settlement info box.  
The ONS pop figures for "Great Linford" are for a census supernumeration district that is far larger than the Great Linford district.  It is completely misleading to use these.
I have deleted the infobox pending further discussion. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 17:41, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inappropriate infobox??? 
Talk:Palazzo Pamphilj

message: This was in Rome. Rome was in the Papal States. It was established in the Papal States.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:37, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: It depends on whether one is adopting a view of where the place was or where the place is. Most modern sources address things related to where they are now. I.e., a book would be about buildings in Italy, not about buildings in the Papal States. If you really want the Papal States one, it could be in both as a compromise. Good Ol’factory (talk) 22:04, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  In the Papal States 
Talk:Grove, Buckinghamshire

message: According to the article, Grove may once have been an important place of worship.  This may be accurate, although it is currently unsourced and fails WP:V.  One of the reasons suggested is that it "sits on a conjunction of several ley lines"; it seems unlikely that this suggestion is notable, particularly because the existence of ley lines is disputed. snigbrook (talk) 15:11, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Ley lines
Talk:Haddenham, Buckinghamshire

message: I've merged the contents of the article Turn End, Haddenham into its own section on this page. I didn't think this would be controversial, as the Turn End page was an orphan (before I created a link to it from here), it was extremely short, and the contents are an obvious fit for this article. Additionally, both that article and this one have received very little editor activity. So following the guidance on WP:MERGE, I didn't think a merge proposal would be necessary.
If you disagree with this merge then please feel free to start a discussion on this talk page. Ligaturama (talk) 13:28, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from Turn End, Haddenham
Talk:Palazzo Madama, Rome

message: For WP:BOLD. I moved the page to distinguish Palazzo Madama, Rome from Palazzo Madama, Turin, since the two pages get a similar number of views and hence there is no primary topic, in accordance with WP:DPT. I made Palazzo Madama a disambig page. Eccekevin (talk) 20:32, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Page name
Talk:Hanslope

message: Apparently the vicar at Hanslope from January 1842 until his death in February 1851 was Rev. James Mayne, MA (Lambeth), a direct ancestor of actor Patsy Kensit. Could do with a proper ref for that, before putting it in the article --Redrose64 (talk) 22:49, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Won't it be on the WDYTYA website? -- roleplayer 23:16, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Such as here? -- roleplayer 23:31, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vicar 
Talk:Hawridge

message: I have suggested that Hawridge and Cholesbury Church of England School article should be merged to the Hawridge article as it is a non-notable primary school. Comments welcome. CalzGuy (talk) 08:52, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: School merge