lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Money clip

message: This section needs some work to remove un-encyclopaedic writing style and explenation of slang 217.37.25.226 14:47, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed slang not directly related to the topic of money clips. Crystalattice 22:03, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Rubber band money clip

message: I came across this article looking to fix vandalism.  This article has been around for about half a year.  It is so trivial that it is funny! I added a little bit for a laugh!  Even included a reference!VK35 00:41, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: funny?

message: When searching, shouldn't "moneyclip" also lead to this page? At this point in time it does not.Rustdrake 03:41, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternate search 

message: This topic appears to me to degenerate rather quickly into tongue-in-cheek humor, especially treating rubber bands as proper devices.  Is this really appropriate?  I would, personally, much rather have information on the history of the item.  I am not in possession of these facts, so I cannot do this myself, but I would love to learn them.  The next heading in the discussion (that I've added) asks a specific question.  Joshua McGee (talk) 20:39, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Seconded. I'm not sure about the tongue-in cheek humor he's referring to, but I'm very interested in the money clip's history. Alphapeta (talk) 09:48, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The tongue-in-cheek referred to the sections on "Rubber Band Money Clips" and paper clips as money clips.  I've deleted them, as they IMO do nothing useful to an actual topic.  If someone disagrees, revert, but: second entreaty for history, socioeconomic distribution, matters of manners (large bill / small bill placement), etc; Joshua McGee (talk) 02:15, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tongue-In-Cheek vs. Historical 

message: Are money clips generally used with the largest denominations on the outside or inside?  Is this cultural, regional, socio-economic, or merely personal preference?  I could think of compelling reasons for either.  I am fully aware of the slang of [insert city] bankroll, which derides the sort of person who would carry a large bundle of low-denomination notes wrapped in the highest-denomination note available, to project an air of wealth he does not possess.  This might be the strongest argument against such an arrangement.  Thoughts?  Joshua McGee (talk) 20:39, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of a money clip 

message: The lead says "A money clip is a device typically used to store cash and credit cards in ....". This is not strictly true, as a money clip can only be used to store banknotes, not coins. Money clips are a rarity in Europe (= I have never seen one in use). I suggest this is because in Europe there are higher value coins, and fewer low-value notes, than in countries like the USA. This means that people carry coins and notes, and therefore use a wallet or purse. Can someone who knows expand this article explaining in which countries these items are common? TiffaF (talk) 16:39, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of a money clip worldwide
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ohio Wesleyan University

message: Please redo many of the foreign language pages so that the school is called its proper name: Ohio Wesleyan University. To call the university Wesleyan University is incorrect, engenders confusion, and seems to be a somewhat ridiculous grab at prestige, (if not a bizarre mistake.) 24.2.244.245 05:26, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Above mentioned article does not clearly tie in why Elizabeth Boynton Harbert and Branch Rickey belong in the article.  Are they alumni?  Former administration?  Former faculty?  The devil is in the details! --Silverhand 20:23, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[activism at Ohio Wesleyan University]]
Talk:Moscow Interbank Currency Exchange

message: "MICEX Index" links to the exchange, not to the index.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.43.235.169 (talk) 13:58, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in the link structure 

message: It has nothing to do with the currency and interbank.125.82.252.209 (talk) 15:21, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why call it interbank currency exchange?
Talk:Navigo card

message: I am confused about this sentence:  "The passes can be charged at ticket booths and machines for weekly, monthly or annual use."
What exactly does that sentence mean?  Some other parts of the article also confuse me?  Perhaps someone can make this article more understandable.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.242.63.93 (talk) 21:21, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Old penny sterling

message: The unit of currency and the coin can easily be presented in the same article without confusion or excessive length.  --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 00:24, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: What title should the merged article have? --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 21:46, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have redirected this page to Penny (British pre-decimal coin), as it did not contain any information not present in the other article. ~ JohnnyMrNinja 06:51, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal
Talk:Pasmo

message: Is there some mechanism for reconciling the content of the Japanese version of this page (which is very large and substantive) with this quite tentative English page? Seems to be a challenging problem in simultaneous translation, though some of the basic steps seem obvious. 
However, I was actually looking to add some information about the replacement policies for a long-term pass version of the card, but it seems that the corresponding information isn't even included in the Japanese version of the article... 
Shanen (talk) 00:22, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Integration with large Japanese article

message: The article mentioned "integrated services". What is exactly meant by this? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tokek (talk • contribs) 06:50, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Integrated service

message: Hello
the pasmo assembler page seems out of reach. Your link does not work either, pity.
your link is:
this link from another z80-assembler works:
I dont know if there is a disambiguate (how do i write this) link to the Pasmo_assembler page, if it (still?) exist. I hope you can help 95.96.201.236 (talk) 15:20, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: pasmo the z80 assembler , link leads to this smart card 
Talk:Brian Carney (rugby)

message: Is this now the standard for dual code players?This deal is getting worse all the time. (talk) 08:24, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: page move
Talk:Payment

message: While informative, the current structure of the page feels disconnected. Contributions made over the last 14 years have resulted in a page that seems to lack the out-bound linking/citations, focus (methods, legal cases, tax treatments, and market sizing make the page feel disjointed), and citations an article like this deserves.
I've proposed a flow below: 
Summary/Overview
Etymology
Terms: Parties Involved, "Canonical" Payment Example,  
Methods: Cash, Cheque/Check, Electronic Funds Transfers (ex: ACH, Wire, RTP/FedNOW, Faster Payments System), Card (Credit & Debit), Cryptocurrency/Blockchain
See Also
Further Reading Finance-deep-rewind (talk) 19:58, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restructuring Page
Talk:Payment service provider

message: It was suggested to merge Payment gateway with this article.
* Agree - In response to the suggestion that the PSP article and the Payment Gateway article be merged, I would have to say that it seems a bit confusing that they are separate articles.  While I admit I don't know much about this industry, it seems to me from my research that a PSP is a specific sort of Payment Gateway.  If this is in fact the case, it would make sense to merge the short entry on PSPs into the broader, Payment Gateway article. --Jrsharp 16:13, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal

message: It is suggested to merge Cashier-as-a-Service with this article.  It seems that both these terms refer to the same type of organisation and I suggest that they be merged. Sargdub (talk) 02:12, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal
Talk:Plaza Accord

message: Can someone explain what is meant by "structural restrictions in the Japanese import market"? -- Beland 01:19, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I live in Japan and purchase a lot of stuff online. There is almost nothing I want from the US or the UK (my country of origin) save Marmite and strong British tea, because I prefer the price and quality of things made in Asia. There is nothing new about this. East Asians have been making things better since the silk road and the Opium Wars (enforced opium import to China to pay for the goods that Westerners wanted from China). The so called structural restrictions, such as the lack of large stores, were removed in the 90s (with great damage to some Japanese retailers of course), but still the large stores stock Japanese and other East Asian products because no one wants Western stuff. There are exceptions. Ikea, Toys-R-US, MacDonalds among them but "structural restrictions in the Japanese import market" needs citation or it should be removed.--Timtak (talk) 05:20, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Structural restrictions 

message: There should be a link to this article from Economic history of the United States and History of the United States (1980–1988). This is important in recovery. MaCRoEco 00:06, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should be linked 

message: The graph in the article is very deceptive. First, the left axis is zero based, whilst the right axis starts at 100. Second, the arbitrary use of the left axis for three different currencies distorts the variation.  The GBP and FFR developments, for example, were similar during the period shown, but appear quite different in the graph. The DEM and JPY developments were also much more similar than they appear in the graph. The correct way to compare developments of the four currencies would be to use indices, with all four starting at 1 (or 100). Faagel (talk) 12:28, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Graph is deceptive 

message: I am going to call for improvement on this Wikipedia article, and invite everyone interested in updating the following areas:
# The content outline of the Plaza Accord
# Analysis of The argument and trade made in the Accord. 
# The initial comment and prediciton at the time of signagure.
... (I will keep adding to this list)
Xinbenlv (talk) 21:09, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Call for Improvement
Talk:It's Like, You Know...

message: When is the It's Like, You Know... DVD going to be released?
Not having the series on DVD is.. "the saddest thing ever". 67.1.121.20 05:38, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Release on DVD?

message: Wow, I would have thought there would be at least a bit more attention here.  I really enjoyed this show during its brief run.  I did surf some reviews, episode summaries, and commentary to be certain of details in the broad overview I contributed just now.  Though it is personal recollection in the broadest sense, I do not believe anything I added is controversial, in error, or even a neutral point of view violation.  However, as long as I'm on the talk page I can confess that I wanted to ramble on at length about the brilliance and excellence of the comedy.  This is a project that should not be forgotten. Demonweed 06:11, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: More attention?

message: Just wondering if three seasons is considered "short-lived"?
dirtysocks 01:51, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Three seasons?  The info box says it lasted less than a year, and the 26 episodes is consistent with a single season. --Mugsywwiii (talk) 00:07, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Short-lived?
Talk:Privy mark

message: Does not provide citations or even explain why. Logic is shady. Sounds like an eBay seller trying to scam people into paying more for their privy coins.
F15x28 (talk) 08:06, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Huge premiums? On eBay?
Talk:Randy'L He-dow Teton

message: She isn't the first person to appear on a US coin while still living.  In 1921, then Alabama governor T.E. Kilby appeared on the Alabama Centennial commemorative half dollar, making him the first person to appear on a US coin while still alive.  In 1926, then US president Calvin Coolidge appearead on the commemorative half dollar celebebrating the 150th anniversary of US independence; he's the second.  It can be said that she is the first living person to appear on a non-commemorative coin, but she is in fact the third person to appear on a US coin while still alive.  (You could say she's the first woman to appear on a US coin while still alive if you like, but she's only the third person.)  I corrected the text to reflect that.  75.70.123.215 (talk) 20:15, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, she's not even the first woman to appear on a US coin while still alive.  Sarah Longacre and Anna Williams come to mind but are debatable, Miss Longacre more so than Miss Williams. However, there is no argument I'm aware of about Teresa de Francisci (wife of designer Anthony) whose portrait appears on the Peace Dollar.  I wouldn't be in the least surprised if a bit of digging couldn't come up with the names of more women who sat for portraits of Miss Liberty on US coinage. Nibios (talk) 07:33, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's kind of arguable whether you should count people who modelled as figures other than themselves.  But another non-debateable appearance of a woman on a coin while she was still alive is Eunice Shriver, who appeared on the Special Olympics silver dollar commemorative in 1995 (she was still alive until August of this year).  Anyway a moot point I guess as this claim has been removed from the article anyway.  If you only count people who appeared as themselves, there's been 3 so far: Thomas Kirby, Calvin Coolidge, Eunice Shriver; if you count models, it's hard to count since some are debateable; in any case, Teton is definitely neither the first person nor the first woman to appear on a US coin during her own lifetime.  75.71.45.63 (talk) 16:38, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Um, no she's not

message: The article gives two meanings for her name. I'm confused. Does it mean one, the other, or both?
"Her given middle name is He-dow, which is pronounced "He-dough" in the Shoshone language, and means Meadowlark.
He-dow is pronounced "Hi-though" in the Bannock language and means "Close to Ground."
67.169.127.166 (talk) 12:22, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Given that she's a member of the Shoshone tribe, I'd expect that the Shoshone definition is more relevant and the Bannock definition is just interesting. I'll leave it up to others more knowledgeable in Native American affairs to sort it out, though, as I hardly qualify. Duncan1800 (talk) 04:48, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: What does her name mean?
Talk:Real-time gross settlement

message: Can someone please explain what core banking is? 193.95.165.190 10:59, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: See core banking, Sargdub (talk) 01:01, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Core banking 

message: I don't think RTGS is an alternative to netting. You can have netting throughout the day and just one RTGS at the end of the day. Can someone with more experience in banking confirm this?
Maszanchi 08:57, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  RTGS vs Netting 

message: It is strongly suggested that the section on RTGS in India is moved to a separate article.
Kacper (talk) 23:50, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  RTGS in India 

message: undid revision by unregistered IP address --Fraulein451 (talk) 07:18, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  undo vandalism 

message: The list has "European Union - TARGET2" but should this actually be "Eurozone - Target2".  Are All RTGS systems single currency or can we say which handle more than one ? - Rod57 (talk) 00:14, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Country or currency
Talk:Representative money

message: I was wondering if there is a difference between representative money and token money.  If there is little distinction we should probably merge them. - Shiftchange (talk) 04:25, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Reading the page on token money, it seems there is a difference. Token money is a form of representative money, but one that is representative by legal degree or custom. It might make more sense to have a small mention of it with a link from here rather than merging the articles. Fresheneesz (talk) 18:15, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Difference with [[token money]]
Talk:Indian rupee convertibility

message: There are many currencies called 'Rupee', so perhaps this should be moved to Indian Rupee convertibility. If no one has objections I'll do this in a day or two. --Kprateek88(Talk | Contribs) 11:51, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Lower case rupee please. Currency units are like meter or gram. They shouldn't be capitalized unless first word of a sentence. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 04:51, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to [[Indian Rupee convertibility]] 

message: There is not enough matter on the page to warrant a separate article. It should be merged to Indian rupee --Dhshah 07:35, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Somewhat agreed. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 03:12, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge to Indian rupee
Talk:Saudi Payments Network

message: Saudi Franis Bank ben me plx  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.138.169.146 (talk) 03:04, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is PLUS not available in KSA?
--Zybez (talk) 19:06, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  PLUS network not available?
Talk:Seeland-II-C

message: I found a link here purporting to be an extract from Krause's book. In fact, it was a PDF version of a page created by Yve Kodratoff which cites the interpretations of Krause and others together with the author's own ideas. So I've added an External Links section and moved the Yves Kodratoff link to there, changing it so that it now links to Yves Kodratoff's index page. I think this is more convenient because (1) it can be loaded quicker, being in html, and (2) it provides references and from it you can access all of his material relating to the early inscriptions. I added Molkte's book to the references. --Dependent Variable.
If the bracteate is from Zealand, why is the entry given under the German name for Zealand? Why not the English or the Danish?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.168.33.62 (talk) 01:31, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Mislabeled link

message: I have recently received this bracteate with an attached note saying something different - quote
"Bracteate from German Iron Age (c. 400-500A.D). This particular one decorated with a relatively long runic inscription: "they call me Hariuha, the master of fate, I bring you good luck"
This is different to what is in wikipedia entry,
Any feedback from anyone?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thepumpboy (talk • contribs) 15:04, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New translation?
Talk:Reconstruction

message: Isn't the recovery of other countries than the US (eg in Europe) after WWII also called reconstruction? If not, it would make sense to give a link to the artcle on that here too. If there is such an article, that is. But there should be anyway. DirkvdM 12:40, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Post-WWII reconstruction 

message: "... theories regarding the 17th-century transcription of plays from memory by actors who had played parts in them." - To some people, this line could mean that the people who have memorised the play were born and/or lived in the 17th century. - Kytabu (talk) 00:26, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Memorial Reconstruction 

message: I have added signal reconstruction under the Science and computing heading, however I think signal reconstruction could be a heading in itself. With a broad enough interpretation, many of the reconstruction topics listed under science and computing can be seen as specific instances of signal reconstruction. I would put 
vector field reconstruction, iterative reconstruction,  single particle reconstruction, and cone beam reconstruction all in this category.
Anyway, one reason for bringing this up is that there is a potential name clash with "Surface reconstruction". The term is used for the problem of determining an unknown surface given some discrete sampling of it. This is quite distinct from the molecular surface chemistry topic that is linked here. There is apparently currently no entry in Wikipedia for this alternate meaning of surface reconstruction (which would be more closely aligned with signal reconstruction).
Yasmar (talk) 17:47, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  signal reconstruction
Talk:Spanish escudo

message: Was there any discussion on the move from Spanish escudo?  Joe  I 03:08, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Support moving --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 05:24, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Move
Talk:Agropolis

message: Talk:Agropolis
Edit summary---
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?offset=&limit=50&target=Foodmuseumguy&title=Special%3AContributions&namespace=
I own the copyright to this writeup  about Agropolis appearing on the Food Museum website about Food and Eating Museums.  
I am an eager newbie to Wikipedia....
--Foodmuseumguy 05:47, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tripolis on the Meander

message: The mere fact that Tripolis is now near (but separate from) modern Yenicekent is no basis to merge the two; there is no evidence of continuity of history, inhabitants, culture, or anything showing that Yenicekent is in any way a continuation of Tripolis. Carlossuarez46 22:34, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible Merger? NO!
Talk:Glenbrook, County Cork

message: thumb|A Painting of the Turkish bath-houses and surrounding area of Glenbrook
Why was the original painting removed, and replaced by an uncaptioned ferry picture? That picture appears to have been used to overwrite a quite different ferry picture, too. --Scott Davis Talk 05:53, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I put the painting back after a discussion on my talk page. --Scott Davis Talk 07:45, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Images

message: Is the ferry picture on the Cross River, or the River Lee, or something else? The text currently calls it the Cross River Ferry (three capital initials), with no wikilink or clear indication if that's the name of the river, or just the name of the ferry. --Scott Davis Talk 07:45, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Ferry
Talk:Vadstena bracteate

message: If we'll read it from reverse with Orkhon runic letters it will look like
"Lk b sh inydi ök oknça öt aksin goydo pu oksütüg agtk agtk"
This translates as:
"...wisdom, light, knowledge; descended; he, himself; with (pointed) tip; speak; through mouth, with mouth; he put, carved, wrote; this; column, megalith; perfect, completed (2 times).
I think it probably means:
Wisdom have arrived(descended),
He, Himself carved this stone,
With his dagger(pointed tip),
The words He spoke with His own mouth,
Which are perfect (2 times).  Iliassh (talk)
They were called "Men of the East", they traded with Turkey, The varangian Guard, I have a bump on the back of my head...  I think it is possible.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.134.36.74 (talk) 03:22, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Norse-turkic runes?