Talk:Businessperson

message: I dont see any history or extra info. If the article is going to stay it should probably elaborate a bit more on the term. Evrenosogullari 14:29, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to Wiktionary? 

message: Some vague comments about the term "businessperson" – two sentences, no refs. About "Word use" – three sentences, thirteen refs. About "Dress code" – six sentences, no refs. What is this article supposed to be about? Gender-neutral language? Wardrobe? Aren't there already articles about those things? 24.36.74.15 (talk) 17:38, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the point? 

message: Hell, the list of references is longer than the article itself.  What's the point of this entry? 68.101.130.214 (talk) 12:57, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Refs longer than article 

message: So please don't bite me!!!! laughs,  Can someone help me with some information?  I am looking to suggest a consistently awarded bussiness man who has repeatedly inspired success at two separate  Chamber of Commerce's in the last 16 years.  I only searched briefly, but noticed the organizations he's been involved in are not "wiki" worthy.  I say that with all respect...Please, please no one jump down my throat.  Are these organizations not worthy of a spot?  If so, is a man who has rapidly reinforced these organizations welcome on the wiki halls?  Or should I not bother suggesting?  I thank you in advance for your assistance. -Hstisgod (talk) 04:42, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  I get worried I'm not posting this stuff right

message: Is it possible to define the boundary which defines someone as a businessperson? There is a dispute at Jade Goody as to whether it is accurate to describe her as a businesswoman. Nietzsche 2 (talk) 23:16, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Can we define parameters?

message: I rewrote this article in September 2015. Please comment here on any suggested changes, or anything that was lost that should come back. --GoldCoastPrior (talk) 23:32, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: 2015 Rewrite

message: A businessperson is a person in deal of business e.g businessman.
 Onabanjo$ 08:44, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Businessperson  

message: "Businessperson"? I myself am a "businessperson" of the female gender and would never in my life use that term. It's moronic that Wikipedia allows such artificial terms to reign supreme. Businessman is not sexist nor is it inappropriate to use when referring to women. 31.208.27.41 (talk) 10:41, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are you joking? 

message: when im performing something, i refuse to be adressed as X-person. call me handyman, businessman, etc. not person.
do not bend over to feminazi extremists.
please revert this to businessman. or ill do it (sometime) KRISHANKO (talk) 12:12, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  person? seriously? 

message: I don't think anybody has ever had complete ownership over the private sector. The first phrase in the article doesn't make sense. —Lights and freedom (talk ~ contribs) 23:36, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "complete ownership over the private sector"? 

message: I don't think it's accurate to include anyone who owns shares in a private-sector company. I own a small amount of stock in a few companies, but I don't think that makes me a "businessman." Luke10.27 (talk) 01:40, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious