lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ambrosius Bosschaert

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that the featured picture :File:Ambrosius Bosschaert the Elder (Dutch - Flower Still Life - Google Art Project.jpg, which is used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for December 24, 2020. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2020-12-24. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:09, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Ambrosius Bosschaert the Elder (Dutch - Flower Still Life - Google Art Project.jpg]] scheduled for POTD
Talk:Ana of the Angels Monteagudo

message: See redirected page for additional content. -- œ™ 06:31, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Note
Talk:Apologue

message: 10 January 2020 - I'm not an editor, just passing through, but surely citation needed on "The origin of the apologue is extremely ancient and comes from the Middle East and its surrounding area (Persia, Asia Minor, Egypt, etc.), which is the Classical fatherland of everything (emphasis mine) connected with allegory, metaphor and imagination."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.79.194.168 (talk) 07:25, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
Talk:Apology of Aristides

message: "Though they see their gods of ten by others and by men" almost certainly should read "... eaten by others and by men" or possibly " ... gotten by others and by men" (where "gotten" means "begotten" in the lovely early 20th-century language of the encyclopedia). Someone should fix all the scanning errors in this article.
66.135.106.50 21:56, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That might make sense, the current wording is obviously wrong. I'll ask some people who know about Judaism. ϢereSpielChequers 06:02, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you clarify your question or query? I'm trying to understand but I am having trouble. Thanks. Sir Joseph (talk) 16:57, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi  the article currently contains the phrase "and the of eat fast" and I'm wondering what that means. The IP has suggested it is a typo and perhaps means "and the great fast". I have no clue as to what that phrase means other than it being some reference to a religious fast. Could it be an odd translation of an otherwise well known fast? ϢereSpielChequers 05:17, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: WereSpielChequersSince I presume it is not referring to Lent, which is sometimes called a great fast, the only thing I can think of in Judaism is Yom Kippur it is one of the mandated fasts in the Jewish calendar, but it's the only one to actually supersede the Sabbath. Of the other fasts, it is much easier to break and not follow the rules, but for Yom Kippur it is a much higher threshold to break the fast according to the law. It is the holiest day in the calendar and it is the day of atonement. Sir Joseph (talk) 13:41, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Well if we can find a source that says that the Great Fast is or better was then a synonym for Yom Kippur that would be interesting. But does that mean you agree with the IP that it should read "and the Great Fast" ϢereSpielChequers 14:03, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't answer if it should read one way or the other, but this site: http://www.betemunah.org/kippur.html has a table where it shows Yom Kippur called Great Fast. I found another site, but it was a Jews for Jesus site so not sure if that will work, and I couldn't find the source they cited in the Bible. But I do think "great fast" makes more sense than "of the eat fast." Sir Joseph (talk) 14:12, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation Issues
Talk:Aponeurosis

message: I'm no expert but shouldn't the definition above include the fact that an aponeuroses can exists as a broad, flat tendon that may serve as either the origin or insertion of a flat muscle? The current definition seems to indicate aponeuroses only separates muscles from each other.    —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bluepattern (talk • contribs) 19:06, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition of Aponeurosis 

message: Is this relevant? "...are referred to in the Patrick O'Brian Aubrey–Maturin series of books."  I don't think this section should be here if that is going to be the only content.  Mbarden 16:01, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Palmar Aponeurosis 

message: I would suggest that 'palmar region' be replaced with 'palm', or 'the palm of the hand'.  The goal here is to explain, not to obscure.   I clicked on the palmar link, and it took me five minutes of digging to find out that palmar was just the palm of the hand.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.38.234.96 (talk) 17:16, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: You mean like the place in the page where it explicitly states "The palmar aponeuroses occur on the palms of the hands."? Mokele (talk) 02:37, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  palmar 

message: It appears to be an implication, based on Wiktionary and numerous other sources, that aponeurosis is named as such because "neuro" means "sinew" means "tendon". Contrarily, I haven't found a single other term in English where 'neuro' isn't used to refer to nerves. Further contrarily, an anecdotal source in fact claims the word "neuro" in aponeurosis refers to nerves; specifically, that the original meaning of the word was the aponeurosis of the skull, which anatomically is located "away from" "nerves" (in relation to the skull), and that other aponeuroses were named after this first one (source: an anatomy textbook author)https://www.quora.com/Why-is-aponeurosis-named-as-such-I-know-the-apo-part-Whats-the-word-root-neurosis.
I (shallowly) suggest taking an official stance not to add an entire new, confusing, contradictory, poorly sourced meaning of the word 'neuro' to the English language through this term, through post-applying a suggestive, non-committal, non-historical etymology that actually makes sense, employing speculative sourcing. I have yet to find other sources to confirm the history of the word (else this would be no issue). Having it listed on Wikipedia would be very helpful. Gewath (talk) 12:14, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Word etymology
Talk:Apostolic Majesty

message: "Since then the King of Hungary bore this title, which, however, only accrued to him after his coronation, and did not belong to him before that ceremony, nor did it extend to the King's spouse (Empress-consort of Austria), nor any other member of the dynasty, not even the heir to the throne, the so-called rex junior, who was crowned in the life-time of the reigning monarch.
Franz Joseph I of Austria was titled "His Imperial and Royal Apostolic Majesty" ... along with his consort Empress Elisabeth, who was styled "Her Imperial and Royal Apostolic Majesty".
What is true then??  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Scn82 (talk • contribs) 02:34, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Empress Elisabeth
Talk:Andrew Allam

message: I have move the following here:
*  
Because I can not find the biogrphy on that page and not it is not under "Alam", or "Andrew Allam" so it is doubtful the New General Biographical Dictionary contains a biography on this man unless he is known under a different name. -- PBS (talk) 16:04, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''New General Biographical Dictionary''
Talk:Apprehension (understanding)

message: It does not seem to me that "apprehension" is a "model of consciousness". --Mattisse 18:03, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apprehension as a model of consciousness 

message: It might be helpful to read the following to help you format reference citations:
*Decision of Arbcom on Appropriate sources for science articles.
*How to cite sources
*Wikipedia:Citation templates
--Mattisse 18:07, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:CITE]]
Talk:Aptera

message: I don't know much about insect taxonomy, obsolete or otherwise.  But I do know that aptera is an order of insects -- apparently an obsolete one. 
The aptera article should either describe the obsolete taxon and say it's obsolete, something along the lines of this old version, or redirect to apterygota as it did for a while with a template at the top of the apterygota article saying "Aptera redirects blah blah &redirect=no".  I don't know which.  Maybe some day I'll do the web searches to find out, but for now I'll just add an item for the taxon.
--Dan Wylie-Sears 2 (talk) 18:52, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Main meaning: an order of insects
Talk:Anna of Tyrol

message: It is somewhat hard to believe that Anna of Tyrol would have been crowned Queen of Hungary in 1608, while it would take another three years before she would marry Matthias.
:You are right, of course. She also could not have been crowned an empress, since the last crowned emperor was her grand-uncle, Charles V. I have removed the dubious information. Surtsicna (talk) 22:06, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Coronations
Talk:Anne Arundell

message: Can anyone explain why or how some renderings are "Arundel" and other "Arundell"? Here father's page says the county results from a misspelling, but her image's title also uses "Arundel" and the family is from Arundel Castle. I know naught but that this is confusing.Czrisher (talk) 16:53, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  One L or Two? 

message: Pretty sure she was just plain “Anne Arundell” before her marriage. Does anyone know when children of peers started using courtesy titles such as “Hon” in the UK? Lady Meg (talk) 02:41, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Courtesy Title
Talk:Arbaces

message: Arbaces seems to be Derbikes, the Sanskrit Darbaka (Ajatasatru)Ctesis also says that Darbikes killed Cyrus, others say it was Queen Tamaris or Jancyrus. Whatever the case, the Shisunaga Empire should be dated to 700 B.C.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.94.35.149 (talk) 01:46, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Anthony Paulet

message: I wrote the original article on my own site here.  Leo cited ME, and then I cited him as well.  That's not a copyright violation.Wjhonson (talk) 18:24, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Can I ask where your site is to take a look?— Rod talk 19:42, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: If it is CountyHistorian I am unable to find any pages including the name Paulet.— Rod talk 20:04, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: If you examine once again the page on Leo's site, you will see his sources are "Wikipedia Website , Reference: bio by Will Johnson".  That is... this very article here is what he means.  I wrote this biography from scratch.  Leo cited me and copied it.  If there is a cv, it's his against us, not mine against him.  Do you understand now? Wjhonson (talk) 01:50, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  http://genealogics.org/getperson.php?personID=I00198908&tree=LEO indeed names wikipedia and specifically Will Johnson as the source for the information. This is clearly not a copyright violation, so I have removed the tag. Yoenit (talk) 10:09, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: OK presumably the same applies to Amias Paulet? It should not be then used as reference to support the information, so do you have any other references which can be used as citations?— Rod talk 13:42, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia's forks can be neither used as citations nor, per WP:ELNO and Wikipedia:Mirrors and forks, included in a list of external links. I've removed it accordingly. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:22, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

text: *Wikipedia is not a reliable source. People who cite Wikipedia and who copy from Wikipedia are not reliable sources. A "fork" is a page that takes Wikipedia's content and develops it further. To quote from WP:MIRROR: 
Mirrors and forks of Wikipedia are sites that mirror and fork Wikipedia. Many correctly follow the licensing terms; however, many others fail to put the notice accidentally or intentionally. Such pages are listed below in alphabetical order. If you find such links, make sure you add them there.Mirrors and forks are not reliable sources and may not be listed as external links in articles.
If the Complete Peerage is a reliable source, you may use and cite it, but you may not use a self-published website that copies from Wikipedia per WP:EL and per WP:Mirrors and forks. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:32, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: *Your edit summary here is rather confusing: "The fact that it cites Wikipedia does not indicate it is an automatic copy." You say yourself that they copied us. Did they not? --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:35, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

text: And I have removed it again. This page copies and cites Wikipedia; hence, it is a fork. But I have requested further feebdack at WP:ELN. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 00:41, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

text: What is highly inappropriate is for you to leave a conversation for a month where two editors have objected to the use of a link and restore it without any effort to first seek consensus. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 01:20, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright violation
Talk:Anthony Stapley

message: I have deleted this article and recreated it as a stub.
This is because Wikipedia Wikipedia:Text of Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License allows commercial distribution, but the current licence used by the British Civil War website is Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which places a restriction "Non-Commercial — You may not use this work for commercial purposes." which the Wikipedia license does not.
Providing the requirements of the Terms of Use and WP:plagiarism are met there is no reason why information from the British Civil War website can not be summarised and and cited like any other copyright text. But it can not be copied under its copyleft licence into Wikipedia articles because its licence is more restrictive than the Wikipedia licence. -- PBS (talk) 20:51, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyleft problems
Talk:Archibald Armstrong

message: The article overall seems to be highly negative in tone... AnonMoos (talk) 10:06, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: To tell the truth, uncritical use of the old Britannica as a "reliable source" is liable to POV abuse, unsupported assertions, and generally inadequate scholarship.  It is often a valuable source, but not always a trustworthy one.  Jackaroodave (talk) 18:21, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: POV?

message: It seems to me unlikely that, if he was old enough to be appointed Court Jester to the British monarch in 1603, he could have died in 1672. Not impossible, but unlikely. The doubtful status of his stated death year is compounded by the title and year of publication of the second Banquet of Jests book. --Haruo (talk) 06:42, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Had he been 21 (full legal age then) at his appointment, he would have been at his death 89 or 90 which was a rare age to live to then but not impossible. He could have been appointed though at a younger age, we never know.Cloptonson (talk) 19:17, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Longevity / death year issue
Talk:Võros

message: Proposal: The first passage could be edited to a bit softer version:
Võros (võrokõsõq, ) are an autochthonous linguistic minority in south-eastern Estonia. They are mostly Võro-speaking people of Estonian nationality. Their language Võro is mostly considered a South Estonian variety.
(I can not edit it myself, because it will be probably reverted by some active opponent.)
--Võrok (talk) 14:34, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Against merging. This is ethinic group with own culture, language not only 'habitants of Vorumaa'. They deserved own page. Hugo.arg (talk) 16:31, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I finally removed the proposal, this is quite important article. Pelmeen10 (talk) 16:57, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Archibald Forbes

message: Recently the file :File:Archibald Forbes and others by Frederic Villiers.jpg (right) was uploaded and it appears to be relevant to this article and not currently used by it. If you're interested and think it would be a useful addition, please feel free to include it. Dcoetzee 04:42, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. GregorB (talk) 16:54, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  New file [[:File:Archibald Forbes and others by Frederic Villiers.jpg]]
Talk:Archimandrite

message: Why is this article tagged as belonging to a series on the "Hierarchy of the Catholic Church?" Archimandrite is not a title used in the Catholic Church, and Orthodox Christianity is not a branch or sect of Catholic Christianity. Tpkatsa (talk) 01:43, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree it should be removed. Although the title exists among some Eastern Rite Catholics and there is a section in this article titled "Western usage", an archimandrite is not a part of the hierarchy and, indeed, the "Hierarchy of the Catholic Church" does not include abbots (except "Territorial abbot", which is not relevant in this context) and an archimandrite is, at most, an actual abbot or, more often nowadays, a purely titular honorary title for a priest. Vincent J. Lipsio (talk) 22:30, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is this article included in "Hierarchy of the Catholic Church?"
Talk:11th Parachute Brigade (France)

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class.    --dashiellx (talk) 18:04, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 
Talk:Arild Huitfeldt

message: His self-chosen Christian name “Arild” is no real name but derives from “årild” – i. e. “old time”.
This half true. Arild is in fact a real and common name, see Arild, but the expression "In Arild's time" do mean "in the old time". And where is the reference that Arild is "self-chosen"? --FinnWiki (talk) 01:59, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thats nicely spotted. I wonder why I havent seen that myself. I have removed the sentence altogether as I have never heard that claim concerning Huitfeldt before, and it was unsourced. --Saddhiyama (talk) 09:32, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Arima Harunobu

message: The emperor had deposed and exiled him, in consequence of an odious intrigue concocted against him by his own son, named Michael. In his exile King John led a very penitent life, to repair all the bad example that he had given, and he desired nothing so much as to expiate by his death his past iniquities. God soon brought about the accomplishment of his desires.
Prince Michael, not content with having thus humbled his father, and with seating himself on his throne, wished also to deprive him of life. He had him accused to the emperor of several supposed crimes. The latter, taking counsel only of the hatred that he bore him, condemned him without trial to be beheaded, and sent one hundred and fifty soldiers to carry out the sentence. It is the custom in Japan that when it is desired that a prince should die, the persons of his court defend him till death. But John begged his servants not to oppose his execution, and through affection for him they obeyed most reluctantly. Moreover, he made them swear not to open his body after death.... He then wrote to his unnatural son a letter full of tenderness, and asked his pardon should he ever have offended him. He afterwards had the Passion of Jesus Christ read to him, praying with tears that the many sins of his past life might be forgiven him. Having had a crucifix put before him, he went on his knees and calmly awaited the death-blow. The good Princess Justa, his wife, who was present, took the head of her husband between her hands and kissed it. Then she withdrew to her apartments, where she cut off her hair, indicating thereby that she renounced the world.
The new king of Arima, the infamous parricide Michael, after having taken possession of all the goods of his father, declared war against the Christian religion....
St. Alphonsus Liguori, The Victories of the Martyrs, pg. 345-346
--Cor martyr (talk) 06:26, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  A different account of circumstances of his death 

message: The article is very confused.  Chock with info, but some quite misleading, such as his statement that Shimazu "invaded Kyushu."  Shimazu's domain was itself a part of Kyushu.  
The Arima/Omura/Otomo embassy to Rome had four ambassadors, not just Mancio Ito.  (Incidentally, the Christian baptismal name comes first, even in Japanese.) The other three were Martin Hara, Julian Nakaura and Miguel (or Michael) Chijiwa.  Miguel Chijiwa's tombstone was recently discovered in a village on the western shore of Omura Bay, not far from the city of Nagasaki.  He was from Chijiwa, a coastal village on the northwestern coast of the neck of the Shimabara Peninsula. 
Tomioka Joe (talk) 02:41, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Arima Harunobu Article
Talk:Aristo of Pella

message: The timeline for Ardasches doesn't make sense.  The text of Moses of Chorene says that Ardasches had been sent by Hadrian to Persia, so this had to occur during Hadrian's reign (117-138).  Therefore, this Ardasches is a vassal of Hadrian and can't be Artaxias I.  Ignocrates (talk) 15:34, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems possible. In ictu oculi (talk) 17:36, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ardasches
Talk:Mari people

message: The main cat was getting cluttered, so I subdivided everything and categorised in the standard country ways. It should all better fit into the Wiki cat trees now.
I'm particularly pleased about the new Mari music and :Category:Mari musical instruments, so please check those out! MatthewVanitas (talk) 05:14, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Organised [[:Category:Mari El]], added new cats (Mari music!) 

message: See text:   This statement has elements of tautology (organised organisations) and of being an of being an oxymoron (neo [new] v traditional).  Furthermore, it is unsourced and the intended meaning is not clear. The text has been tagged.  The grammar doesn't seem right either (Mari traditional religion organizations).  Please help with clearing this issue up. Cinderella157 (talk) 10:40, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unclear and unsourced statement
Talk:Merya people

message: id like to know the population of Merya now in year 2010. i know that people that lived along side these people i found a map on wikipedia with merya and this tribe lived in the middle ages. one group was chud and they are now exstinct. another group called Veps also Vepsians the vepsians still have population. has the merya ethnic group died out or is there still members of this tribe?
99.164.123.146 (talk) 14:27, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Added to article: they were assimilated by Slavs thousand years ago.Katafon (talk) 06:13, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  what is the population of the merya now ?
Talk:Asano Yoshinaga

message: The right name of this article is Asano Yoshinaga. Please move.--61.23.40.237(Vaiow120@jawp)22:35, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks.--61.23.40.237 (talk)(Vaiow120@jawp)20:24, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:Aston Cockayne

message: I've changed Aston's birth place from Elvaston Castle to Ashbourne Hall as per the reference: The Gentleman's Magazine for 1863.  I think this is a reliable source, but I'm open to discussion.  The above source also indicates that his birth was in 1605 rather than 1608; although it confirms that he was baptised on 20 December 1608.  Note that Elvaston Castle not built until 1633 (this is the present building; I can't find any records of an earlier one).  Any assistance or further information would be welcomed. -- MightyWarrior (talk) 22:21, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Birth place and date