lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Second Coming (TV serial)

message: Can we find some specific critical responses?  Personally, I thought the ending was rubbish. Slac speak up! 13:05, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I like the ending. But I'm an atheist, so I would. Titanium Dragon 08:17, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I liked the ending, more or less. Davies had painted himself into a corner of sorts - he had to figure out some way to come up with a Third Testament, or wrap things up some other way. I liked it because, being an atheist myself, I think humanity is far better off without god(s), angels, demons, etc. MCB 05:36, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Reaction

message: I'm not sure "TV series" is a very accurate description for this production — it was a self-contained two-part drama, whereas 'series' suggests a number of episodes and a different kind of show. Oughtn't it to be moved back to the more general "TV"? Angmering 20:14, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for letting me know about this and your polite comments. Based on your comment I've moved to it a (TV serial), though it may also qualify as a (TV programme),  It should not be (TV). Check Wikipedia:Naming conventions (television) for more details. --Reflex Reaction (talk)• 21:30, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately, User:GMc performed a series of confused page moves today which undid this. I've posted on his talk and asked him to restore the page to "(TV serial)", which is correct according to the guidelines. --MCB 19:45, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

text: *Thank you -- can you move the Talk page too, please? --MCB 17:44, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *OK, I think everything is complete now. Thanks. --MCB 19:40, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Page move

message: Just a note that I've removed the black bars from the images. Nice article, all. WindsorFan 08:33, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Black bars 

message: It seems a little ridiculous that this image is here, doesn't it?  It's just a grey box with the words "The Second Coming" in the middle, in a pretty nondescript font.  And when you first pull up the page, it's the only image you see.  I don't see how it adds to the article whatsoever, and I'd much rather see one of the other screen shots there at the top of the page.  Yes? AaronL 03:21, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is a generally accepted part of WP:TV's manual of style that a television programme's intertitle is used in the top right of the article. You should address your problem with how the title card looks with the Red Production Company, who produced the serial. Brad (talk) 19:34, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Opening titles" screen shot? 

message: I just wonder about the relevance of placing in ( ) that Davies was head writer of Doctor Who?  He is very well known for it, but it doesn't seem necessary here.  Perhaps it can be referenced under the characters list next to Eccleston?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.69.141.108 (talk) 23:20, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doctor Who relevance
Talk:Salzach

message: Since salt was such an important commodity, it would be nice to know where the salt came from that was shipped down the "Salt" river (as this page currently (2009-Oct-20) says is the case).  Was the salt mined, shipped over the Alps, or something else?  I think such information might not rightly belong in this article about the Salzach, but perhaps in its own article, with links as appropriate (including a link in article about the city Salzburg).
Dan Aquinas (talk) 18:15, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Useful addition:  source of the salt
Talk:Austria-Este

message: Hi all, I made a family tree using the family template here on my sandbox. I think it would be easier for the casual reader to understand vs. the ASCII one. What would be better form -- to integrate the information from the ASCII one, or to remove the extra information? I have two versions to compare:
* User:Yaminator/Austria-Este - bare essentials, names only. Could add notes for extra information and remove titles.
* User:Yaminator/Austria-Este2 - example with a few years and titles
Also, do you think this is necessarily a better alternative to the ASCII art one? Thanks! Yaminator talk 20:45, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Without titles showing descent of Este heir, this genealogy doesn't help much: Fewer Christian names, more territorial possessions needed. FactStraight (talk) 01:13, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  Fair enough! How would you suggest adding in territorial possessions? I copied the naming conventions from the existing ASCII family tree, so I'm just using what was already on the Wiki page.  Do you mean for Karl Ludwig, citing him as Karl Ludwig of Austria instead of just his name? Thanks! Yaminator talk 01:31, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Easier-to-read Archdukes of Austria
Talk:F. F. E. Yeo-Thomas

message: Some additional info on Yeo-Thomas’ early RAF career, happy to add and reference. Any thoughts? Cambaroo (talk) 01:39, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early RAF Service 

message: Yeo Thomas has a street named for him - "rue Yeo Thomas" in the 13th Arrondissement of Paris, just south of the Bd Vincent Auriol, between rue Nationale and rue du Chateau des Rentiers.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.82.66.16 (talk) 11:17, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional honour 
Talk:Harpers (Forgotten Realms organization)

message: the harpers have been intrdouced in update 16. they added a new quest pack called high road of shadows, and the story line ia about a nether scroll http://ddowiki.com/page/Update_16_Release_Notes i would add it but my spelling is horrible  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.22.44.120 (talk) 14:08, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  DDO
Talk:Government Flying Service

message: According to this article, the GFS operated 6 Sikorsky S-76 helicopters. According to the article Royal Hong Kong Auxiliary Air Force, the RHKAAF transferred 8 S-76 helicopters (6 S-76A and 2 S-76C) to the GFS in 1993. Anybody know what happened to the extra 2. -- 91.84.39.186 (talk) 14:07, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sikorsky S-76 

message: Shouldn't this article note that the GFS is subject to US sections?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 45.64.242.223 (talk) 06:37, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  US Sanctions 

message: User:Citobun: Noted that you reverted my edits to the captioned section. Given that your edit summary "Whitewashing" is quite vague, and your revert removed multiple points contained in the edit, I am not sure which part of the edit you object to specifically. 
I invite you to clarify this so we may have a discussion on how we can refine the edit.
Thank you Carter00000 (talk) 13:52, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert of Edit in "History" Section
Talk:Nanyang (region)

message: At 09:45, 22 May 2014, content from Draft:Great Golden Peninsula was merged into this page. Per the terms of the GFDL license, all content added within this diff should be properly attributed to . --benlisquareT•C•E 09:50, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Added attribution template at top of this talk page. — Maile  (talk) 13:23, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article merge attribution 

message: This section is extremely problematic. The section does not distinguish between Chinese citizens and ethnic Chinese. Even someone with the most basic understanding of history will know that Chinese communities in Southeast Asia predate the Communist Revolution by many decades and have minimal ties to China, especially political ties, and blatantly contradicts every single article of all the ethnic Chinese communities in Thailand, Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia and Cambodia. Nanyang is an archaic term that is certainly not used by modern immigrants or modern governments and is irrelevant to modern politics. It presents speculation as facts and all the sources are dead links so they are completely unverifiable. Top it all off with POV about "disconcerting relationship" and you have a section that ought to be deleted immediately. 42.61.172.8 (talk) 10:53, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Political concerns
Talk:Russell Tribunal/Archive 2

message: Actual wording of the Request for Comment:  Should contemporary views and/or possible criticism of the Tribunal, including some from a Russian author, be permitted within the article? 
:::nobs notes: "should read "contemporaneous" not "contempory", meaning a Nobel Laureate's work written "at the same time of the Tribunal", not modern comments written after the fact.  Nobs 17:10, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I beleive any fairminded rational reader can see the Russell Tribunal page for what it is, if they want to waste the time to do so, despite the fact no qualified criticism is allowed of this sacred cow.  Being a newbie it's been a learning experience and you've certainly been helpful.  Unfortuneately I got other projects that need my attention so we'll just leave this to another day. Nobs 16:42, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The previous two weeks of discussion have been archived.  In addition, I've copied a portion of this page to Talk:Stokely Carmichael for further discussion at a more appropriate location.  I've also left a copy of KC9CQJ's Advocate Statement and Request for Comment above, since this article is still listed at RfC -- Perhaps others might still opt to participate here.  Nobs has indicated he has 'other projects' to which he must attend, and no productive discourse has been held here in over a week.  All of my points of discussion have been addressed, and any further comments appear to be no more than petty and irrelevant banter, so I will be withdrawing from this discussion as well.  -Rob 16:17, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: For the record: being new to wiki, my failure to respond to the above user, assuming he does not revert signatures for a third time, when he made what some may construe as a accusation against myself in archive, in no way suggest I agree with said user or accussation.  Nobs 19:54, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for comment
Talk:OhGr

message: I don't think Trent Reznor is ever attacked in the Cracker video. It's obviously a reference to March of the Pigs, but I'm uncertain whether it's a positive or negative reference. I guess Reznor looking like a king riding his giant pig and the pig vomitting on the soldier might indicate a negative reference. Anyone else got ideas? —midg3t 08:24, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Have you listened to the lyrics? I don't know how you can know what the song's about, and think it isn't an attack. Twiin 04:07, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The director added Trent, the backwards NIN logo, the pigs as well as Eminem w/o Ogre's knowledge (there's an interview clip on You Tube where they talk about this). So you cannot use the video to directly interpret Ogre's lyrics. Naufana : talk 04:25, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cracker video 

message: "In a recent interview Ogre joked about naming the next ohGr album after his dog's myspace page. " Citation? Seekue 00:40, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: At Present

message: What does this mean? The linked article is totally irrelevant too. Equinox (talk) 16:04, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "non-linear flavour of electro-industrial" - what?
Talk:Lahaul and Spiti district

message: Those involved in editing this article might wish to contribute their thoughts to Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Mr Tan. Mel Etitis  (Μελ Ετητης) 15:45, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I am not sure that "Indo-Caucasian" makes any ethnographical sense. In my opinion this might be a relict of the attempts of the proponent of the Aryan race (Himmler) to prove the existance of lost  remnants of an imagined Aryan race hidden somewhere on the Tibetan plateau. But I might be wrong
Moumine 23:00, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Would "Indo-European" do? Or simply "Caucasian"? JMBell° 09:44, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Indo-Caucasian

message: Leo1pard (talk) 09:25, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page views 
Talk:List of islands of Sri Lanka

message: I'm not clear what the point of this list (with two red-linked entries) is. Mel Etitis  (Μελ Ετητης) 15:55, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Variable bitrate

message: Perpetuating that VBR is not supported by hardware was a valid point in the 90's. Give examples of modern hardware not supporting it or i shall remove this moot point. 
--Zaph--213.243.140.48 (talk) 08:41, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  VBR not supported by hardware is a moot point 

message: I have a problem with the wording of this sentence: "Devices that support only CBR encoded files are becoming increasingly difficult to find." Why would you want to look for them? Furthermore, this section should be renamed because it doesn't really have any cons. --194.251.240.114 02:42, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pros and Cons 

message: is bandwidth constant in a network ?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.212.230.129 (talk) 09:33, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  about bandwidth  

message: To me it seems extremeley far-fetched that the VBR pattern may reveal the contents of what is spoken. Should unserious speculations be included in a Wikipedia lemma? Yes, I am aware that it is supported by a reference - but that does not say a lot to me! 81.207.20.42 (talk) 08:08, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Having read a paper on this before in connection with Opus (audio format), I'm convinced that the data provided is plausible in demonstrating that key spoken phrases that are rare enough may be statistically inferred from bitrate variations (in certain codecs at least). This may allow interested parties to focus brute-force decryption efforts on the most likely candidates, improving overall detection rates.Dynamicimanyd (talk) 19:56, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Far fetched 

message: What does TVBR stand for?--2A02:810A:11BF:E564:5AB:D9E:57E8:EF6D (talk) 20:39, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  TVBR 

message: Possibly outdated, as modern video codecs allow cheap signalling of white noise using noise modelling.
46.230.131.152 (talk) 10:42, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  [...] or white noise will require a higher bit rate to encode without visible artifacts
Talk:Kingston, Tennessee

message: In 1809, Kingston was state capital for one day.  Does anyone have any further info?
--ZekeMacNeil 16:28, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Capital for one day
Talk:List of unsolved problems in physics

message: Currently there are several types of measurements of the Hubble constant, which seem incompatible with each other, given the experimental errors. The situation is described in Hubble tension, it seems that this is an unsolved problem that could be added to the astronomy section. --Davius (talk) 20:26, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It is in the "Cosmology and general relativity" section. StarryGrandma (talk) 05:11, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hubble tension 

message: The statement says 'background parameter', which is actually untrue.
Everything happens due to a consistent use of cause and effect over time.
Take any influence, set Δt to zero, and any influence becomes zero.
Also, cause and effect can not exist at the same time, which is when Δt = 0.
Any state can be only singular at any given time.
Since no more than a single state can exist during any given time, without time, any influence or force
can't have any effect, and thus a local big bang can not have occured that created all 3 of time, space and filler.
Time needs to exist for any state change, so that must have existed before the big bang.
But also space, since a point can't contain volume, and so if all energy that exists in the univere today
would be from a point, this would lead to an energy density equation looking like E/v in 4D => E/0^4 => E x ∞^4.
If that were true the amount of energy released would be enough to fill any part of space with an infinite amount of energy.
The big bang was not a singular event, but happens 'locally' in each segment of space and has a volume to start out with.
This then makes then energy density equation into E/v in 4D => E/f, where f is a finite greater than zero => E x f^4.
This yields a finite ampount of energy, and a finite amount of energy density, which satisfies the current observation.
So, first time, then space, then filler, in that order, but t is always present for any influence greater than zero.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.238.45.149 (talk) 11:40, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quantum gravity: Problem of time. 

message: I don't know about all the areas in this article, but at least for fluid mechanics, upstream contamination can be explained by the decreased surface tension of contaminated fluids, which allows the contaminant to flow upwards toward the container with stronger surface tension. Nknka (talk) 14:09, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the feedback. As the upstream contamination article does not say anything about the open problem and this item in the list has no reference, I took the liberty of removing it from the list.--ReyHahn (talk) 14:24, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some of These Might Not be Updated
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Portal:Cricket

message: *Neutrality, why you have not seen fit to comment on the matter beyond three lines and multiple reverts, could you explain how this listing is valid?  To me, its just your way of getting support you might not receive on WP:RM.  Correct me if I'm wrong.  Smoddy (Rabbit and pork) 16:16, 1 May 2005 (UTC)

message: May I enquire what is being proposed? Is it intended that Portal: become a new namespace, in which all Wikiportals would be located? If so, I am not opposed - though I might suggest it be called Wikiportal:. Or is there some other intention?--Cyberjunkie 04:33, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Clarification
Talk:Evagoras I

message: I'm pretty sure this article should be at Euagoras; I'm not aware of any other instances of upsilon being transliterated as v.  Are there any objections?  Binabik80 16:49, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Certainly there are many instances of upsilon being transcribed as v or f, although I think that's normally when transcribing Modern Greek rather than Classical Greek.  Strictly speaking, it's transcription rather than transliteration, because the choice of which letter in the Latin alphabet is used, depends on the pronunciation. Michael Hardy 02:10, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: PS: I'd bet large sums of money -- maybe even 50 cents, that nearly all cases in which the letter f appears in transcriptions from Modern Greek are occurences of upsilon.  The other Greek letter that gets pronounced that way is φ, and that's transcribed as ph. Michael Hardy 02:12, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The convention in English -- which after all, Binabik80, you defended so well in Mark Antony -- is that Ευ- is transliterated as Ev- before a vowel: Evander, not Euander. (And indeed, evangelist, not euangelist.) Opoudjis 15:29, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

text: The English convention is eu (Euripides, Euryclea, Eumenides, euphony...). English Evander is due to the Latin <Evandrus>, pronounced 'ewandrus' - the v was a semivowel, not part of a diphthong. English Evangelism is due either to a later development in Greek (The NT was written in Koine greek) or to Vatican influence. While it's fine to use f/v for modern Greek names (Mr Evripidou), this article is about someone who would have pronounced their name Euagoras.--Nema Fakei 00:01, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Haham hanuka

message: Hi, I'm a sysop at he, and I'm not sure in which section to add this, but I'd like to add that currently User:Haham_hanuka's user page acts as a search engine fraud, displaying, in addition to porn star bios, a long list of Hebrew words for no other apparent reason. I don't know if there are rules against this on en, but it's more evidence for reckless (and in the he wiki we've said it out loud: troll-ish) behaviour.
Eranb 18:33, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Enabling Act of 1889

message: 
Says that according to the enabling act, that individual gun ownership was guaranteed.  I guess becuase US accepted Wyoming's constitution as part of the cotnract?
~ender 2008-03-23 20:45:PM MST
:That link is now dead, but it's archived: http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=56914. I think you meant Montana (Wyoming is not a significant part of this Enabling Act). Also, the basic argument presented isn't specific to this Enabling Act. It's the general idea of how the territory became a state by agreeing to the Constitution as it was understood at the time. They argue that if the understanding changes, then the agreement becomes void, and Montana would no longer be a state. The article seems quite alarmist, to be frank. —Mrwojo (talk) 17:06, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: What's up with Wyoming?
Talk:Monte Rosa

message: (transfered from main page) Monte Rosa is a very big mountain which isnt well known.. why is that? someone else post here
::Probably because it is lower than nearby Mont Blanc and less "impressive" than Matterhorn. Viewfinder 19:07, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Please, please, please can Wikipedia stop using the un-English expression 'highest/biggest/smallest etc. of' a geographical area? In English the correct preposition is 'in': 'the highest mountain in Switzerland'. The use of the preposition 'of' is a mistranslation from other languages.212.30.86.78 (talk) 15:23, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Highest mountain of' 
Talk:Fabada asturiana

message: I would like to know why MFC's ONE reference trumps my four.  It is people like you who make others give up on Wikipedia.  Your arrogance is astounding.Asturnut (talk) 15:49, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Asturnut ... what are you referring to here?  Which four, what is being trumped?  I've added one ref, the other was there before?  Thanks -- Mike mfc (talk) 17:08, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Asturnut question 

message: The Cuban fabada is exactly the same fabada as in Spain. It is not a soup, it is just fabada. Then I see no point in the sentence presently in the article about Cuban fabada. In the best of the cases it could say that fabadas are also prepared in Cuba but, definitely not that it is a soup.  franklin  04:28, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cuban fabada 
Talk:The Art of War (film)

message: will someone help me out with the picture? Axezz 19:31, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why weren't people casted who speak proper Mandarin? Everyone had a strong, ugly accent. It's even more a shame to let a Japanese person play a Chinese one. --77.0.111.59 (talk) 23:23, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trash
MediaWiki talk:Nospecialpagetext

message: Change
Line 1:                                                                                                                                                	Line 1:
You have requested a special page that is not recognized by Wikipedia. A list of all recognized special pages may be found at Special:SpecialPages.	You have requested a special page that is not recognized by Wikipedia. A list of some recognized special pages may be found at Special:SpecialPages.
Not all special pages are listed at Special:SpecialPages (though there could be an alternative to "some"). — Qwerfjkltalk 19:49, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @Xaosflux, that has much the same has issue as the current wording - suggesting that all valid special pages are listed there, although it is a slight improvement. — Qwerfjkltalk 06:56, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @Qwerfjkl I suppose that's what the "valid" pages part is about. I'll move to the default, then if you want to suggest an improvement for the default you can make it at phab, and all language projects will benefit from it (just like anyone who goes to special:specialpages here when their interface language is set to anything other than english. — xaosflux Talk 09:53, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 24 October 2022