lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Spring Awakening (play)

message: Is there definitive evidence that all of these characters are in the original play?  The names of the minor characters seem to be strange anglicizings, and just a bit odd.  Rcharman 01:02, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Minor characters

message: I am at a loss to understand why this page is called "Spring Awakening."  The name of the original German play is "Spring's Awakening." I am not an experienced user of this site, so I don't know how to go about making such a major correction, but I am a former Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst fellow who spent 1973-74 in Munich, in part researching Wedekind at the Wedekind Archiv (I hoped to write a dissertation on him), my German was excellent and is still pretty decent, and I can assure you that the title of the play, Frühlings Erwachen, means Spring's Awakening. The phrase, "more accurately," is mine, replacing "sometimes," but the title of the page itself should be changed. When I have the time, perhaps I'll compare the German, which I have, with the synopsis here, but obviously that would be a major undertaking. Simplizissimus (talk) 05:15, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The Wikipedia policy I understand is to use the most common title, not the most correct. Spring Awakening is the standard English rendering. DionysosProteus (talk) 01:36, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

text: Spring Awakening is by far the more common title. It has nothing to do with the piss-poor musical. Have a look at a sample of history of theatre textbooks and translations of the play. DionysosProteus (talk) 04:32, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

text: "Spring Awakening" is correct. Even on the German Wiki. Perhaps you're thinking of the subtitle "A children's tragedy" (Eine Kindertragödie)? 74.83.35.137 (talk) 21:45, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

text: The Edward Bond translation (given a major Off-Broadway production in 1978) uses Spring Awakening. NeoAdamite (talk) 17:03, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Translation of the title

message: There is a photo of Peter Lorre as Moritz and Lotte Lenya as Iise in a 1929 Berlin production of the 
play. M Bateman-Graham 203.171.196.129 (talk) 10:15, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Photograph
Talk:Sheng Siong

message: Sheng Siong hypermaarket is a new supermarket/hypermarket in singapore.
i could not add any thing inside. so asking if any body can add some more details inside
I luv erky 01:10, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Angela Salvagno

message: Should this be in the Article of Angela? She is now also in the Porn-Business. See here. --Netpilots (talk) 18:55, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Angela Salvagno now in Porn Business
Talk:Trivium (disambiguation)

message: * To User:Reginmund and User:Maurauth: Please do not edit Trivia and Trivia (disambiguation) any more until you have sorted out this matter in discussion, or need may arise for someone to enforce a cooling-off period. I am an administrator. Anthony Appleyard 09:14, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Please cool things down

message: Trivium (education) should be renamed to Trivium. All other uses of the word Trivium are too trivial to warrant notice on Wikipedia. Rwflammang (talk) 21:53, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page should not redirect anywhere
Talk:Associateships of Imperial College London

message: Can someone please move this page from ARCS (degree) to Associate of the Royal College of Science, as I know not how to do this.
:Moved. Timrollpickering 12:55, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Move page

message: Just for general information.  British and US usage vary when it comes to the word 'honour/honor' - it's 'honour' for Britain and most of the Commonwealth, but 'honor' for the US and probably Canada.
However, the word 'honorary' is spelt the same way everywhere.  Basically, there is no such word as 'honourary'. --  Jack of Oz  ... speak! ...  09:43, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Honourary vs. honorary

message: the ref MSCi hyperlinks incorrectly to Master of Mathematics (MMath)
212.49.239.64 (talk) 10:14, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  incorrect hyperlink 

message: Right now, only this associateship has its own page, however, both the AGCI and ARSM have the same standing, and could have separate pages. The question is however, do they need them? Whilst the history of these awards may be of interest, I doubt they need their own separate page given that most of the pertinent information would likely be duplicated. I would suggest instead broadening the scope of this page to all of the relevant associateships, to cover their history (before the colleges were part of a University, the historic reluctance for degrees in Engineering, etc.). Would anyone object?  Shadowssettle(talk) 18:15, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: As no-one has responded, I'm assuming in good faith that I can continue with this suggestion for now  Shadowssettle(talk) 16:30, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broaden to "Associateships of Imperial College London"
Talk:National Council on Bible Curriculum in Public Schools

message: There is a list of schools that have accepted or applied the curriculum, but no reference is given to that list.  Unless someone comes up with references I will delete the list, since there is no proof.  Cjrs 79 01:45, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: School Districts

message: Has the first paragraph here been vandalized?   Johns1952 (talk) 16:36, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Curriculum legality 

message: The article does contain a lot of information that is not flattering to this organization. However, all of this information is accurate and sourced. I don't believe it should be removed. If someone would like to add accurate, sourced information that is flattering to this organization let's do that, but I am not able to locate such material other than what the organization itself has produced. Suggestions?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by ZMantis (talk • contribs) 02:14, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion of the "bias" in the article
Talk:New England cottontail

message: The revision of 15:10, 23 December 2009 adds the following phrase to a sentence:
", as well there are know populations of rabbit in Eastern and Central pennsylvania.[3]"
The cited reference does not support the existence of the New England Cottontail (Sylvilagus transitionalis) anywhere in Pennsylvania.  I suspect that the editor had seen individuals of the Eastern Cottontail (Sylvilagus floridanus) in Pennsylvania and mistakenly added this phrase.  I will delete it, preserving the reference, which is correct for the original sentence.
JamesHAndrews (talk) 18:16, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article needs to be thoroughly checked for copyright concerns. Content entered here seems to have been copied from this source, which is not compatibly licensed with Wikipedia. (It forbids commercial reuse.) Some of that content is still in publication in the article. Other sources should be verified as well. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:02, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright concerns

message: Merricack valley? Is it real place? or it should be Merrimack Valley 37.190.50.119 (talk) 04:50, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Merricack valley of New Hampshire" What is it? 

message: * maps.iucnredlist.org/map.html?id=21212
Please add a more detailed distribution map, such as the one on the Red List page. -71.174.176.136 (talk) 18:59, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  distribution map 

message: * www.metro.us/boston/bunny-infestation-overruns-boston/zsJofC---Cf1Se4Rx8KvjU/
 Bunny infestation overruns Boston
 July 1 2015, Nate Homan 
 Rabbit season in Boston makes for the cutest neighbors imaginable
Please add information about cottontail rabbits living "wild" in urban/suburban yards. Are they all likely to be Eastern Cottontail, or are some also New England Cottontail? -71.174.176.136 (talk) 19:14, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bunny infestation overruns Boston 
Talk:Ainult unustamiseks

message: :Image:Ainultunustamiseks.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 01:53, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Ainultunustamiseks.jpg
Talk:Ainult armastusest

message: :Image:Ainultarmastusest.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 01:53, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: the article is provided with :File:Smilers - Ainult armastusest.jpg--Estopedist1 (talk) 08:36, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Ainultarmastusest.jpg
Talk:Nugget

message: I have removed several red links that have been around for a while ... I have also removed some (dubious) unlinked definitions because the consensus view is that if there is no article to which it can be linked, then it should not be included in a disambiguation. — 15:10, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redlinks 

message: I removed the Mosin–Nagant listing because "nugget" is not mentioned on the target article, and per WP:DABMENTION it shouldn't be listed here.  The Mosin–Nagant article would not be useful for users wanting more information on "nugget".  I would also argue that "moist nugget" is a partial title match for nugget, and per WP:PTM it again shouldn't be listed here.  Hoof Hearted (talk) 15:50, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moist nugget
Talk:St. John Cantius Church (Chicago)

message: How about a picture of the legendary altar? --Secisek (talk) 22:11, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Altar

message: There was a confusing description of an "elaborate Neapolitan "praesepio" (Italian creche) from Rome." Usually the word after "Italian" would be the Italian word -- so I reworded it, and made the spelling agree with :it:presepio. But then I realise that it says, a "Neapolitan" (means Naples) ... from Rome. Further clarification would help. Imaginatorium (talk) 07:42, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Architecture section: "praesepio"
Talk:Bruneian Sultanate (1368–1888)

message: Well certainly as a Bruneian myself, i found this an interesting subject to look on into and began research bits and bits about the history of Brunei. The sources from my article are taken from a book containing yearly reports by European traders coming to Borneo to Brunei and early diplomats from other countries as well. Brunei was an empire state. Situated in the middle of South East Asia, it was a major port city too, with its navy spread all around the East Asian waters. Involved with a war with Spain, battled with the Majapahit empire and even involved in the earliest peacekeeping mission in history. I hope other researchers and historians could provide a much deeper insight about Brunei.Khiari 02:10, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  About an empire 

message: I believe that this article will be more interesting if we add the Bruneian empire map.
--Mr. Knows (talk) 07:00, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please insert the empire map 

message: Hello, if anyone can put a second coat of arms, please put  Syazwi Irfan (talk) 13:39, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  2nd Coat of arms
Talk:Gotha Go 145

message: Wouldn’t a literal translation of Störkampfstaffeln and Nachtschlachtgruppe be „harassment squadron” and “night battle wing” instead of “night harassment squadron” and “night harassment wing”? Rosentredere 17:23, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe, I got those translations from Bishop's book (see references) I double checked them they do say “night harassment squadron” and “night harassment wing”. Maybe Bishop's translation of the German is wrong, I always thought, they seemed odd. --Bryson{Talk}{Edits} 17:43, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: To me Bishop's terms look more like a descriptions of the duties these units took on, not like translations of their actual names as there is neither a “Nacht” in “Störkampfstaffeln” nor a “Stör” in “Nachtschlachtgruppe”. Rosentredere 18:21, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation
Talk:Curiosities Volume 1

message: :Image:'Curiosities Volume 1' cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 02:24, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:'Curiosities Volume 1' cover.jpg

message: It's an album cover image, and I believe I did the same thing with it that I've done with many other album covers. Is there something I can do in the future to avoid receiving this message?K d f m 11:19, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Is this tag: {{Non-free album cover}} no longer sufficient for album covers?
Talk:Edward Behr (journalist)

message: Edward Behr died on May 27 2007 at the age of 81. He was the author of numerous books, ranging from "The Last Emperor," a classic, to "Anyone Here Been Raped and Speak English," also in its own way a classic. I met him in Hong Kong and Vietnam during Tet 1968 offensive when he was with Newsweek -- before he had written most of his books. Hope someone will offer bio details as he certainly fulfills the "notability" requirements.....211.196.13.48 02:32, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

message: This article has been classified as a start needing more referencing. I have removed the cleanup tag as the person who left it didn't say what needs to be cleaned up. Capitalistroadster 20:23, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Start
Talk:Micromastia

message: This is a dispute about the definition of Micromastia and the controversy over the term.  23:07, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The term is only use five times in the scientific literature, which does not bode well for its legitimacy. Two of the mentions are in notes, not articles. One of the five times mentions it in the context of breast asymmetry. None of the other seems to consider it a deformity or illness, but rather a descriptive term, used to distinguish surgeries for augmentation from surgeries for breast hypertrophy, mastectomy repair etc. I would hazard to guess that at best it could be used to mean small-but-healthy breasts. Speciate 05:38, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: micromastia is really just another synonym to describe breast hypoplasia, which is a multi-factorial pathology covering everything from structural issues of the chest wall to vague subjective notions that one's breasts are "too small" in an aesthetic sense. It's a real term (if not one I tend to use) and indexed in sources like Dorlands Medical Dictionary which is good enough for meDroliver 00:59, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

text: micromastia is not just another synonym to describe breast hypoplasia, since hypoplasia means underdeveloped, while micromastia can include fully developed breasts that just happen to be small.  But we are just rehashing what is written above, this space is really for comments from other people.  Fanra 10:13, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

text: DrOliver is completely correct here. The term is certainly used more than "7 times" and is recognized by most readers as a synonym for breast hypoplasia. As for many disorders of size, the boundary between what might be termed micromastia and "small but normal" is not sharp and is partly statistical and partly value judgement, just like a medical definition of short stature. alteripse 11:07, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you, although this topic is recieving macro (pun intended) attention in excess of what it desrves  Droliver 01:46, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

text: There's a page on Man Boobs.  If someone gets polio and has one boob is all shrivelled and funky while the other is normal-sized, there ought to be a term for it... oh wait, there is a term for it.  Micromastia.  It's in Taber's too (along with macromastia).  It's a legitimate word describing a legitimate condition.  I think we can prevent controversy here by not including young women looking at big-breasted celebrities and fretting over their A-cups. I agree with Enuja about distinguishing between small functional boobs and underdeveloped (non-working) ones. Dikke poes 21:20, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for Comment: Micromastia

message: The Micromastia article and the Tuberous breasts article both appear to discuss the same subject: the postpubertal underdevelopment of breasts. Unless there is an encyclopedic difference between these two terms, Tuberous breasts should be merged into Micromastia, the more common term. Neelix (talk) 19:36, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger with [[Tuberous breasts]]
Talk:Asian cuisine

message: There was no mention of this in the main article on this group of people. valereee (talk) 11:11, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed unsourced derogatory assertion 
Talk:Kick Back Relax

message: :Image:Agnes kick.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 02:39, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Agnes kick.jpg
Talk:Age of Renaissance

message: :Image:AgeofRenaissance.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 02:42, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:AgeofRenaissance.jpg
Talk:Norman von Heldreich Farquhar

message: This webpage http://www.arlingtoncemetery.net/farquhar.htm is WP:SPS and not RS. The info posted was probably copied from obits or other copyrighted sources. It is linked here for info only. Also please note it is not secure -- it does not use a :HTTPS url.  – S. Rich (talk) 04:21, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  arlingtoncemetery dot net
Talk:Wooden ox

message: Alright, I've done some research on this subject and the Romance of Three Kingdoms is not the only book to have mentioned this invention. It was also mentioned in the factual work Records of Three Kingdoms, the Book of Qi, and other works in the Sung dynasty.
Records of Three Kingdoms: "木牛者，方腹曲頭，一腳四足，頭入領中，舌著於腹。載多而行少，宜可大用，不可小使；特行者數十里，群行者二十里也。曲者為牛頭，雙者為牛腳，橫者為牛領，轉者為牛足，覆者為牛背，方者為牛腹，垂者為牛舌，曲者為牛肋，刻者為牛齒，立者為牛角，細者為牛鞅，攝者為牛鞦軸。牛仰雙轅，人行六尺，牛行四步。載一歲糧，日行二十里，而人不大勞。流馬尺寸之數，肋長三尺五寸，廣三寸，厚二寸二分，左右同。前軸孔分墨去頭四寸，徑中二寸。前腳孔分墨二寸，去前軸孔四寸五分，廣一寸。前杠孔去前腳孔分墨二寸七分，孔長二寸，廣一寸。後軸孔去前杠分墨一尺五分，大小與前同。後腳孔分墨去後軸孔三寸五分，大小與前同。後杠孔去後腳孔分墨二寸七分，後載剋去後杠孔分墨四寸五分。前杠長一尺八寸，廣二寸，厚一寸五分。後杠與等版方囊二枚，厚八分，長二尺七寸，高一尺六寸五分，廣一尺六寸，每枚受米二斛三斗。從上杠孔去肋下七寸，前後同。上杠孔去下杠孔分墨一尺三寸，孔長一寸五分，廣七分，八孔同。前後四腳，廣二寸，厚一寸五分。形制如象，靬長四寸，徑面四寸三分。孔徑中三腳杠，長二尺一寸，廣一寸五分，厚一寸四分，同杠耳。（《三國志·亮集載作木牛流馬法》）"
The Book of Qi:「以諸葛亮有木牛流馬，乃造一器，不因風水，施機自運，不勞人力。」
Both of these excerpts are taken from the Chinese wikipedia. Apparently exactly what the wooden ox did is quite controversial (http://140.116.71.92/acmlab/newpage14.htm), but there shouldn't be doubt that such a thing existed. I'm going to go ahead and take off the Fiction header now. Valhallia 13:51, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources
Talk:The New Mike Hammer

message: What, no mention of Velda? I'm shocked!  TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura  10:44, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Listen, angel 

message: I created this page originally, but in retrospect I believe that it should actually be considered the same show as Mickey Spillane's Mike Hammer (1984 TV series) with a new title. I think this page should be incorporated into the main series page and this page be redirected to it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr. Mephistopheles (talk • contribs) 22:55, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorporation into Mickey Spillane's Mike Hammer (1984 TV series)