Talk:Paleo-orthodoxy

message: Paleo-orthodoxy and the Convergence Movement are not the same. Paleo-orthodoxy is theological, whilst Convergence has some theological aspects but also has to do with liturgy.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:8080:2302:BC93:8DF3:F92B:7FFE:B3D8 (talk) 05:16, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

message: Section discussing critics and defenders of paleo-orthodoxy begins with weasel words ("Some people think...") and makes several controversial claims without citing any supporting references.  From what I know of paleo-orthodoxy the criticisms cited in the article are actually not generally made and smack of an attempt at painting it as just another form of fundamentalism.  I placed  and  tags on this section and will leave them up for a while to see if corroboration is added.  If not I believe the entire section should be removed as unsubstantiated and not written from a neutral point of view.  Pleonic (talk) 21:53, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I heartily agree. This section stinks like original research. That said, I'm sure there are plenty of critics of paleo-orthodoxy, so methinks the thing to do is rework the section, amending it to agree with actual, cited critics of paleo-orthodoxy. ZoomaBaresAll (talk) 19:56, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations for Critics and Defenders

message: The neo-orthodoxy article outlines the tenets of the school, but this article appears to have no such information. Can someone rectify this please? Rhomboid Man 16:57, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Lack of information

message: The article is good, but the link to Christopher Hall gives you several Christopher Halls to chose from, none of which is the Christopher Hall implied in the article, a living teacher of theology, I know not where.
– — … ° ≈ ≠ ≤ ≥ ± − × ÷ ← → · § 
Beau in NC (talk) 18:53, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Created an article on the Christopher Hall intended, then linked it to the citation in this article.  Pleonic (talk) 21:31, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Faulty Link 

message: Lacking expertise in this field, it appears on the surface that "Paleo-Orthodoxy" has a similarity to the ideas of "Radical Orthodoxy", both seeking a return to classical Christianity and the teachings of the church fathers. Could someone with some expertise in this field compare/contrast the two theological sensibilities. How do these both relate to the Convergence Movement and to Robert E Webber's call for an "Ancient-Future Faith"? LAWinans (talk) 19:39, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paleo-Orthodoxy and Radical Orthodoxy 

message: Does the (British) variant palaeo-orthodoxy have sufficient presence to justify including it as an alternative spelling? I have found one article on the net that uses it (Wikipedia History of Christianity). Annoyingly, Google includes "paleo-" in the results, and I don't feel inclined to wade through looking for the few variant ones. Koro Neil (talk) 05:37, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Palaeo- ? 

message: Maxie Dunnam was added to the list of Paleo-Orthodox scholars that contributed to Ancient & Modern Christianity: Paleo-Orthodoxy in the 21st Century, but he is not listed as a contributor in the book itself. Also there was no reference to identify him as being part of this movement. For these reasons I removed the reference to him -- at least until someone can provide evidence that he does adhere to Paleo-Orthodoxy.  
Dunnam is involved in the Methodist Confessing Movement but this is not a sure indicator that one professes Paleo-Orthodoxy. They are separate, though sometimes related, things. Pleonic (talk) 03:14, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maxie Dunnam 

message: This article borders on the promotional for Thomas C. Oden, describing him as "dominant" and listing 7 of his books. Can we bring it in line with the neutral point of view guideline? (WP:NPOV) - Epinoia (talk) 19:49, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Promotional 

message: This article should be merged with Convergence Movement, which is a different name for the same thing. (There's a proper way to do a merge proposal, but I will have to figure it out.) - cheers, Epinoia (talk) 00:03, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: @Epinoia Definitely NOT the same things. 2603:8080:2302:BC93:79AF:196:7CF1:843C (talk) 19:24, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal