Talk:Marko Djokovic

message: :Is this person relevant for wikipedia?--212.200.172.68 (talk) 15:24, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Why not?--Vitriden (talk) 01:17, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: move. The requesters have provided evidence that Djokovic is the preferred form of the name in english. The opposers have not provided evidence that the original form is preferred. DrKiernan (talk) 09:55, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: See Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Cyrillic)#Serbian for this issue. --Komischn (talk) 16:49, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: One of several sections which exists under the overall header When no commonly accepted form exists in English. The nom has presented a prima facie case that Djokovic is commonly accepted in English. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 15:23, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: WOW, PMAndersonyou are able to write two words in foreign language (it is Latin, do you know?) . That is really "amazing".--Añtó| Àntó (talk) 09:27, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Funny, I thought that the prima facie here would be the fact that this person is a Serb with a Serbian name. Húsönd 02:16, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Either way, despite the title, the page linked to is a proposed naming convention, not a current guideline. Dekimasuよ! 13:40, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

text: If you're anything like me, you're probably flabbergasted by the people here who think they are above the burden of proof. No one opposed to this move has produced any evidence that this man's legal name is anything other than "Djokovic." When asked, they only chide and insult, and one of those people is, quite inexplicably, an administrator... --Yano (talk) 17:25, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: After having the same discussions a thousand times with the same users who just won't give up their agenda, you simply deplete your patience for providing proof, or anything else but the raw acknowledgment that you are against these eternal proposals. We haven't been here for two days. And nobody's insulting, just lacking patience. Húsönd 19:50, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a confession of what is indeed the case; Husond has no evidence, and never has had any; he merely has an agenda to refashion the English language. His claims should be given a weight proportionate to their basis.  Septentrionalis PMAnderson 22:49, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You wish. Húsönd 07:34, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

text: The quality of this encyclopedia is also hinged on people following the guidelines. Going rogue and stonewalling a legitimate page move because you don't like it is not helpful. --Yano (talk) 23:52, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: As in the case of Novak Djokovic, evidence suggests that "Djokovic" is the prefered rendering in the English language. 
Official Tennis Organizations:
* Association of Tennis Professionals
* International Tennis Federation
* Wimbledon
* The Australian Open
English-language Sports and General Media:
* BBC Sports
* Sports Illustrated
* ESPN
--Yano (talk) 01:05, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Evidence

message: The name of this article should be changed to "Marko Djokovic" because that is the name used on the English-language websites of the official governing bodies of tennis, which are the Association of Tennis Professionals and the International Tennis Federation. This also is how his brother's surname is spelled on English Wikipedia, Novak Djokovic.  Tennis expert (talk) 19:57, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: See Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Cyrillic)#Serbian for this issue. --Komischn (talk) 16:49, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: One of several sections which exists under the overall header When no commonly accepted form exists in English. The nom has presented a prima facie case that Djokovic is commonly accepted in English. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 15:23, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: WOW, PMAndersonyou are able to write two words in foreign language (it is Latin, do you know?) . That is really "amazing".--Añtó| Àntó (talk) 09:27, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Funny, I thought that the prima facie here would be the fact that this person is a Serb with a Serbian name. Húsönd 02:16, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Either way, despite the title, the page linked to is a proposed naming convention, not a current guideline. Dekimasuよ! 13:40, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

text: If you're anything like me, you're probably flabbergasted by the people here who think they are above the burden of proof. No one opposed to this move has produced any evidence that this man's legal name is anything other than "Djokovic." When asked, they only chide and insult, and one of those people is, quite inexplicably, an administrator... --Yano (talk) 17:25, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: After having the same discussions a thousand times with the same users who just won't give up their agenda, you simply deplete your patience for providing proof, or anything else but the raw acknowledgment that you are against these eternal proposals. We haven't been here for two days. And nobody's insulting, just lacking patience. Húsönd 19:50, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a confession of what is indeed the case; Husond has no evidence, and never has had any; he merely has an agenda to refashion the English language. His claims should be given a weight proportionate to their basis.  Septentrionalis PMAnderson 22:49, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You wish. Húsönd 07:34, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

text: The quality of this encyclopedia is also hinged on people following the guidelines. Going rogue and stonewalling a legitimate page move because you don't like it is not helpful. --Yano (talk) 23:52, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: "Srdjan Djokovic" and "Djordje" would appear to be the preferred spellings of his family's names:
*New York Times
*Herald Tribune
*Herald Sun
*ESPN
*Novak's official website
*Times Online
--Yano (talk) 23:21, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia has criteria for reliable sources and these fit. That is why they are relevant. --Yano (talk) 13:42, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: These source might be relevant as a source for his tennis matches results , certain events of his biography eetc. but for the details aboute him definitely not!!! Just anexample  what happens if somebody with disputed "knowledge" is allowed to write and talk about everythingAñtó| Àntó (talk) 08:01, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Family names

message: Many Featured Articles only use the article title in the header: Anton Chekhov, Wail al-Shehri, Shahbag, Darjeeling, IIT KGP, Ghandi, Simeon I of Bulgaria, Prince Sadruddin Aga Khan, Anastasia Nikolaevna, etc. These articles are considered to be of the highest quality, so we should follow their normal practice. Please discuss in the future before re-adding or changing the name in the template header. --Yano (talk) 13:42, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah right. This is the revision of Anton Chekhov which passed FAC. Admiral Norton (talk) 13:54, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Template header

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Marko Djokovic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://www.atptennis.com/en/common/TrackIt.asp?file=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.atptennis.com%2Fposting%2F2007%2F439%2FQS.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110725115753/http://www.juniortennis.com/ajt/tournamentinfo.php?t_id=16626&h_id=2515 to http://www.juniortennis.com/ajt/tournamentinfo.php?t_id=16626&h_id=2515
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:23, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified