Talk:Buck Rogers XXVC

message: Unfortunately, the various XXVc products (novels, rpg, computer game, etc.) do not share exactly the same background information. For example, the info on Pluto comes from, I believe, the novels, but that info isn't part of the rpg. The XXVc canon is not the same from product line to product line and distinctions should be made. All I know is the rpg or I'd do it, myself. 64.136.202.212 (talk) 00:15, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Cite your sources

message: XXVC was merged into Buck Rogers without discussion.  I restored this article because it is of significant length to justify having a seperate article.  Also, it is specific to the TSR products, so the scope of the atricle is mostly independent of the Buck Rogers article.  --KertDawg 17:35, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There were a number of inaccuracies in the text.  As an example, in the first paragraph, it was claimed that XXVC was absed on D&D, and then that XXVC was a wargame like Risk.  These two statements are contradictory.
I would suggest a more piecemeal approach to editing full-length atricles.  --KertDawg 16:09, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds like someone got confused because of the XXVC boardgame. MasterGrazzt 08:59, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverted to 18 August 2005 

message: The image :Image:Brcharandcombat.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here.  In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.  Please check
:* That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
:* That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --22:58, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image copyright problem with Image:Brcharandcombat.jpg

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.pvv.ntnu.no/~leirbakk/rpg/buckrogers/products/buckrogers_index_products.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Theleftorium (talk) 20:20, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: *Casus Belli #62https://archive.org/details/casus-belli-062/page/n29/mode/2up
2601:240:E200:3B60:71D7:B3A5:2B16:2909 (talk) 11:14, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reviews