lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Parents Television and Media Council

message: A word like focus in the "fact sheet" will make it a fact. The fact in my opinion should be alleged focus; but I want to make sure that my focus does not appear here. So I am going to change it in Stated Focus. Which does not include any value and nicely makes up for the fact that Focus is currently followed by a quote. So it should be Stated Focus followed by a quote.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Frankk20168 (talk • contribs) 12:15, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Right Box Summary / Fact Sheet Inherent Bias 

message: This article may have some significant neutrality concerns. The lead seems biased against its subject, the section "Advisory Board" appears biased towards the subject, and the article generally uses a lot of what appears to be unexplained jargon.  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  00:41, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: It would be helpful to other editors to highlight which statements or words you feel have undue weight using inline citations. For instructions, please see this page. Also, proposed changes are more than welcome and as I can see an open question to you above, answering it might help to illustrate your intent and get the conversation going. Lexlex (talk) 15:55, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality concerns
Talk:Morehead State University

message: An unregistered editor is insisting that this article include a long bulleted list of the names of many buildings on campus. There is no discussion, description, or context of any of these buildings, just a long list of names. This is not helpful for readers and unless someone is willing to add context and discussion this material should be deleted. ElKevbo (talk) 00:54, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of campus buildings with no discussion or context
Talk:Roach Motel

message: It's true.
*unsigned comment by Flying Hamster. -- 8^D BD2412gab 16:38, 2005 Apr 8 (UTC)
Removing image of "Roach motel" because the picture was apparently drawn with paintbrush and is not a detailed rendition of a real roach motel. Not up to encyclopedia quality standards.71.163.210.242 04:31, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Green Bullfrog

message: The Green Bullfrog album has a Motown feel with an open jam-like atmosphere.  Performances are high spirited, mostly up tempo, especially the hot closer "Bullfrog", where musicians take turns at ripping out some pretty tasty solos. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.179.227.33 (talk • contribs) 04:28, 9 December 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hi , Two quick questions please because I don't have access to refs. Is the date for 3rd recording session 4 or 7 January? Is the 1980 re-release more simply named Green Frog, or is that  a typo? Thanks, JennyOz (talk) 12:31, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: , Checked my CD liner notes, it's definitely 4 January 1971 according to that. The 1980 reissue, which I also have has "Natural Magic (TM)" on the LP spine and the label, but I don't think that's part of the title. Green Frog was added by this edit, which wasn't me and there's never been an album called that. I am concerned the GA review did not pick up on these factual errors, but since the sources are all offline and I'm probably the only editor who has them sitting twelve feet away from a computer terminal, I'll take the blame for this. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:14, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for clarifying . I'm going to see if I can find and listen. With such an assembly, it can't be too bad. JennyOz (talk) 13:38, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: , It's a great album, incredibly obscure, but I've been listening to it on and off for over 30 years, never getting tired of it. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:56, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: , you're right, it's great! Thanks for the introduction. JennyOz (talk) 15:23, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quick questions
Talk:RETAIN

message: joke? (y/n)
*No, this is not a joke.  It could probably use a better article, but there really is an internal IBM tool called RETAIN, and it really has been around just about forever.  Since so many people are used to using it, it sticks around.  One thing it's used for is tracking customer problems. Dave6 19:56, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)

message: I have just posted an update to this "stub" article. I was deeply involved in the development of RETAIN and its applications during my IBM career, from 1970 to 1993, so the information provided here is as correct as my memory allows.
I was, at one time, designated as "Chief Architect" of the RETAIN system, during a period in which we attempted, with scant success, at replacing its antiquated architecture with a new one.  I intend to post some general description of both the genius, and stifling limitations, of the unusual architectural framework upon which RETAIN was built. This framework no doubt stands as the principle impediment that exists to replacing the RETAIN system, now well into its fourth decade. I believe that this history could be very instructive to many people both inside and outside of IBM.
I am now retired from IBM, but still working in the software industry.  A full history of RETAIN would require someone else to fill in how the system has been modified in the years since 1993, including its current functions of feeding data to IBM web servers. Still, RETAIN is probably one of the most outstanding examples of a "legacy mainframe system" in existence.
Russ 06:46, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical Information Added (only a limited beginning) 

message: RETAIN has evolved over the years to become a data server more than a application server.  As the needs of the various business units varied it became impossible to build a user application that supported these varied needs.  The mainframe 3270 platform that the RETAIN applications runs under became less desirable as the web applications became more prevelant.  The architecture evolved to support "services" using a standard well documented API written in JAVA.  The RETAIN Toolkit now provides the various client applications in IBM access to the RETAIN data and business processes by executing these services. 
The basic architecture of RETAIN has remained unchanged over the years with the occasional update to support new hardware and software features that were not forseen when RETAIN was first developed.  Jbarnes4868 (talk) 16:51, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some updated RETAIN information.
Talk:Lichtenstein's hartebeest

message: Can we get a picture that IS NOT the things butt...?—Preceding unsigned comment added by T ConX (talk • contribs) 9 December 2004
:It's an okay picture. There's another one here if anyone feels like asking for it. I don't think it's a high priority though. Richard001 (talk) 02:15, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:U.K. Subs

message: This band seems notable, based on some quick Google searching.  Perhaps someone more familiar with them can replace this massive (already getting a warning for >32k) unwikified text dump with an actual article? Dave6 05:32, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: This article survived a Vote for Deletion. The discussion can be found here. -Splash 02:00, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Vote for Deletion

message: This band is called "U.K. Subs", not "The U.K. Subs".  I'll correct it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.147.211.109 (talk) 21:44, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name correction
Category talk:Stargate characters

message: Should this category contain all characters from the Stargate universe including those from Stargate Atlantis, or should this be limited to SG1 and movie characters only?  Steve the Wraith seems to be the first Atlantis addition, and before it gets completely mixed, I was wondering if moving this category to Stargate:SG1 characters and creating Stargate Atlantis characters would be preferable, or if mixing would be fine.  If anyone cares.  --ABQCat 06:04, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Chinese characters of Empress Wu

message: It seems odd that the article mentions that as being the Japanese name for the characters of Empress Wu, but does not give the Chinese name anywhere.  It seems perfectly reasonable to me that 則天文字 would serve as both the Chinese and Japanese pronounciations.  Other than that, this is a really cool article.Iluvchineselit 06:32, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Apparently it borrowed using on'yomi reading in Japanese. 112.205.97.30 (talk) 03:03, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Isn't it much more likely that the character was simply relatively recently reinvented based on the western zero?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.139.82.82 (talk) 00:21, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  ‘now used in Modern Chinese’ 

message: Please would an interested editor assess the material added at User:Jessie3535/article2 about the impact of this script, and if valid then add citations and incorporate it into the live article? Please also then leave a note here when done. – Fayenatic London 21:58, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abandoned user draft
Talk:NOC

message: Network on Chip (NoC) is a new idea for designing such future SoCs. In the NoC theory a router-based network is  used for packet switched on-chip communication among cores. 
A typical NoC architecture will provide a better communication for interconnecting cores.
Why are there two entries for Network Operations Centre? Similarly, why does the second one have a long description, surely this belongs in the article itself?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.104.21.81 (talk) 12:26, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Indo-Pakistani war of 1971

message: this article fails to mention significant Israeli arms sales to India. 2A00:23C7:5882:8201:24FF:16B0:A09A:99C0 (talk) 13:36, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: They didn't sell to India they sold to Pakistan 2A00:23EE:2878:41C2:FFD9:5369:B979:3A85 (talk) 08:24, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Israel 

message: Please mention the casualties of mukti bahini 2409:4061:4E13:7DFE:0:0:B28A:4D0D (talk) 05:53, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mukti bahini casualties not mentioned 

message: In the "Background" section, 5th paragraph, in the last statement please re-wikilink/pipe the "generic" term "Bihari" to more context-specific wiki articles - i.e. either to the Bihari (piped to "Stranded Pakistanis in Bangladesh") or the Bihari (piped to "Persecution of Biharis in Bangladesh"). Thank you. 119.74.238.54 (talk) 12:37, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Current wikilinking seems accurate.Accesscrawl (talk) 02:44, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 16 December 2023 

message: It was a major cold war between Soviet union and United States. Soviet union stopped the submarines in Indian Ocean if they have entered God knows what worse the outcome would be for india. Similarly Pakistan was not alone too it was supported by usa as it was a strategic ally of usa at that time and it usa ordered Iran too to supply Pakistan arms. In the field do write who is supported by who as this was not a war only between india and pakistan but was one of the major proxy war as a part of cold war. Our friend Israel also helped a lot by supplying both arms and intelligemce. Please mention it in the supported by column 👍 Indianigga (talk) 15:23, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not only Indo-Pakistan war 

message: I would like that someone could add the 1971 officers coup in pakistan to the article in impact or aftermath for information and context of the fall of Yahya Khan GamerHashaam (talk) 01:44, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  1971 officers coup
Talk:Civil union in New Zealand

message: I moved this to the plural to accord with the other articles on this subject, viz. Civil unions in Quebec, Civil unions in the United Kingdom, et seq. - Montréalais 07:15, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair enough. I think technically they should all be singular, since it's the Wikipedia standard. You'd expect "Marriage in New Zealand" not "Marriages in New Zealand". I might be oversimplifying it though. Ben Arnold 20:22, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article Civil Union Act 2004 is a stub and expanding it would just create an article almost identical to this one, I suggest merging the two, what do others think? Lossenelin 04:32, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger Suggestion
Talk:HMS Dreadnought (1906)

message: This whole article reads like the dreadnought itself wrote its own Wikipedia article - full of inflated claims of importance unbacked. 
It’s also informally written. The word “ironically” shouldn’t appear in a wiki article, and sentence structure devices like “In fact” also do not have a place in these articles. Someone needs to purge this article of this style of writing, and make it sound less like a story by your grandad all about his favourite ship 79.66.8.116 (talk) 21:15, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to WP:FIXIT. - wolf 02:19, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality and formality of writing 

message: It is stated that at 21 knots it was the world's fastest battleship. I find that difficult to believe. What speed did it achieve on trials? Is there an accurate source? the Austro-Hungarian navy had two classes of battleships at the time both achieving 20.5 knots in their sea trials. I have not examined the German navy. 2A00:23C4:B617:7D01:D52F:F40B:EDF:9DF2 (talk) 12:46, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: 21.6 knots average speed over 4 trials at the Polperro measured mile on 9 October 1906.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:23, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Claims
Talk:Schabir Shaik

message: What do others think about dividing this article into headings eg: 
: Early Life
: Underground Years - ANC Intelligence, Bulelani Ngcuka 
: Controversial Issues - bringing in issues about Patricia de Lille, Jacob Zuma, Mac Maharaj, Ranjeni Munusamy , Chippy Shaik, Yunis Shaik, Mo Shaik, Alain Thetard, Shauket Fakie, Willem Heath, Joos Hefer and Thabo Mbeki. --Jcw69 08:10, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:Christian fundamentalism

message: Articles that are members of :Category:Christian fundamentalism should have "fundamental" or "fundamentalism" somewhere in the main text of the article.
Categories that are members of :Category:Christian fundamentalism should have "fundamental" or "fundamentalism" somewhere in the category page or the text of the main article.
--Kevinkor2 23:18, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Membership in Christian fundamentalism

message: They are not christians, and should not be included on this list. Even according to the westboro wiki page, they have been labeled as a cult by most every christian group in the world. 209.142.189.26 (talk) 22:23, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Westboro Baptist Church
Talk:Eau Claire City Council

message: While I am still unsure about if because this was on the City of Eau Claire's website, that it is a matter of public record. While I did ask permission to use the information that I copied from the site, and it was granted, they were unable to tell me what the general rule is for government pages within Wisconsin.
Hope this resolves this issue, but I really would like to know exactly how fair use/public record/public domain plays into local governement sites.
Micah 00:28, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry about that; should I revert it to the copyright statement? I'm not really sure how these things are resolved outside of removing any potential problems (which I did, I hope, by re-writing the article). I'll just keep my hands free of it from now on until it is resolved. Thanks MicahMN | Talk 23:53, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: I decided to just re-write the whole thing, but I'm still unsure about the Copyright Issue

message: Moved from Wikipedia:Copyright problems:
* Eau Claire City Council from  Brianjd 08:35, 2004 Dec 9 (UTC)
:: These seem to be public records of a city government. Are they copyrightable? --Gene s 08:45, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text:  They are not under copyright, they are in the public domain Micah 23:18, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: The discussion at /Talk is quite interesting; it seems possible that (almost) all Wisconsin government documents are PD, in which case this should be recorded somewhere (Wikipedia:Public domain resources?) to guide (a) future WP:CP cases and (b) provide Wikipedians with a source of PD materials. Having said that, wisconsin.gov has a copyright policy which implies that they do have copyright. --rbrwr± 17:30, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: After looking at the Wisconsin Copyright page, it says that "The fair use guidelines of the U.S. copyright statutes apply to all material on theWisconsin.gov and linked agency Webpages." Then it says "For copy or use of information on the State of Wisconsin website that is outside of the fair use provisions of copyright law, please seek permission from the individual listed as responsible for the page." Isn't Wikipedia using this for fair use? Micah 23:55, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe so, but Fair use is not the same as public domain. If you want to assert fair use, go ahead. I would still like to know whether it really is PD, because it makes a difference to future copyvio cases. --rbrwr± 19:48, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problems 

message: Is this supposed to say "aldermanic"?  Tomertalk 00:31, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  aldermatic districts
Talk:Technocracy (Mage: The Ascension)

message: I reverted your page movement so as to comply with Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style#Titles - article title should not contain excess capitalization. -- Forseti 08:50, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Capitalization

message: I edited the introductory paragraph to bring it more in line with the intent of the authors who wrote the actual fiction on which the article is based. It had previously displayed a bias. I should probably add a "controversy" section into the article itself covering this topic, as the Technocracy's status vis-a-vis antagonism is something the fanbase spends a lot of time arguing about. --Stephenls 1:42, 28 Oct 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Introduction

message: I know that this is important to Mage: The Ascension, but notability is not inherited after all and this article does not show any individual notability outside of Mage: The Ascension. Thus, I think this should be merged either into the main article or some sort of list. Also, before anyone mentions the other WoD articles, remember that other stuff exists and just because they have an article doesn't mean this deserves one (or, indeed, that the other articles deserve to exist). – Harry Blue5 (talk • contribs) 23:18, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge discussion
Talk:AC Propulsion tzero

message: I have in the past been corrected by ACP themselves, the "t" in tzero is supposed to be lowercase, see their own website and you will see that they don't use upper case "T"'s in it's name. --D0li0 11:40, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: tzero is supposed to have a lowercase "t"

message: The reported relation between watt hours per mile and J/km in the text is absurd.
: 180 Wh/mile × 3600 s/h / 1.6 km/mile = 405000 Ws/km = 405 kJ/km, not the value 895 J/km given in the text. The discrepancy is a factor of several hundred. I checked the source document for this claim, and it is also in error. -- 99.233.186.4 (talk) 21:06, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  Never saw J/km. Nowadays kWh/km is commonly used in Europe. Alex42 (talk) 14:40, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  absurd relation to J/km
Talk:River Axe (Bristol Channel)

message: this is in Britain, right?
In case the article's Category: Rivers in Somerset is ambiguous, you can click on this category link to reveal that this category is itself a member of Category: British Rivers - so, yes. Ian Cairns 13:30, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsigned commemt

message: Assessed as C and low importance for WP:WikiProject Rivers.  Needs a map and could benefit from organising into structure as suggested at project page. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:23, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:Thomas Bernhard

message: Hello all
I have renamed the section that was "Sources" with a less misleading title: "Works cited". I have removed some duplicate and dubious external links to blogs etc and concolidated them in the External Links section. Please see WP:EXTERNAL and WP:Verify.
Happy to discuss Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 04:31, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Works cited and cleanup 

message: Hello all
I have replaced the section Works with two subheadings: Themes and Style, and Reception and Legacy. I have significantly expanded the content. I have replaced unsourced and inadequately sourced content with reliably sourced information.
Happy to discuss. Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 05:28, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Work  

message: Hello all
I have expanded the lead to better summarise the new content in the article.
Happy to discuss. Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 05:33, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead 

message: Hello all
I have significantly expanded this section and renamed it to reflect the new content. I have replaced some unsourced material and content with dubious sources with material based on the major biographies by Honegger (2001) and Mittermayer (2015). I have moved some material from the Reception and Legacy section to the Life and Work section.
Happy to discuss Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 05:40, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Life 

message: Hello all
I have added a British English template. Although Bernhard has no strong connection to any English speaking country, British English is the predominant form used in the article so it it best to continue with this to maintain consistency.
Happy to discuss. Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 23:41, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  British English
Talk:Inter frame

message: Hi, there is no redundancy in a movie. In movie compression technologies, the high compression rates are obtained with loosing quite a lot of information. So the I-Frame do not remove redundant data. They are on the contrary an acceptable trade-of on the picture quality. You can double check that by asking question: can you rebuild original movie from a compressed one (MPEG4 for example) ? The answer is no, because some data are lost. :-) Gtabary 09:36, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: You are correct that wavelet based algorithms are different, but they still use macroblocks, even though they are overlapping instead of sharply separated as in DCT macroblocks. The underlying principles of both remain the same with respect to the contents of this article. C xong (talk) 03:38, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Katoomba, New South Wales

message: I moved the page from "Katoomba" to "Katoomba, New South Wales" to follow Wikipedia place-name convention. Techelf 11:41, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What is a "non-nuclear household"? Thanks!--203.10.224.60 23:23, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This article: nuclear family explains the concept. I'm not sure why it was thought necessary to include that phrase, because non-nuclear family groups appear in lots of places. BrianFG 23:42, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  non-nuclear households 

message: Is it /kə'tuːmbə/ with the second syllable having the vowel from "goose", or /kə'tʊmbə/ with the vowel from "foot", or something else? Beorhtwulf (talk) 05:25, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation
Talk:Christoph von Dohnányi

message: As opera conductor Dohnányi had been in residence with Philharmonia Orchestra at Theatre du Chatelet in Paris [...]  Since 1994 an intensive relationship has developed with the Opernhaus Zürich, [...]
The sources given do not support this material. I replaced them here with the following source:  —Coconutporkpie (talk) 02:38, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 
Talk:Aiyana

message: I have a feeling that several of the entries under Aiyana#Aiyana the girl's name are vanity entries. I will try to return to this entry for verification, and more fixup. gK ¿? 12:15, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)

message: We 2600:4040:B7B4:3800:1D9B:F289:B3BC:D4CB (talk) 02:10, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hi