lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Scarlet myzomela

message: the scarlet honey eater will eat animal droppings as well as there own if there is a scarce food supply  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aznp2pro4u (talk • contribs) 07:52, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  what they eat 

message: *this for sexual behavior/display. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 04:14, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: bookmarks

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that the featured picture :File:Myzomela sanguinolenta 1 - Windsor Downs Nature Reserve.jpg, which is used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for March 10, 2021. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2021-03-10. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:13, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Myzomela sanguinolenta 1 - Windsor Downs Nature Reserve.jpg]] scheduled for POTD
Talk:Provisional Wings

message: Should this article be moved to Strategic Air Command Provisional Wings or similar? --Nick Dowling 23:36, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's been done with the content of the article--Lineagegeek (talk) 10:30, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: There have been a lot more provisional wings than those in Strategic Air Command.  As of ca. 2001 all expeditionary units are provisional units.  It doesn't seem appropriate to me to have a generic title like this redirecting to a narrow article like List of USAF Provisional Wings assigned to Strategic Air Command.--Lineagegeek (talk) 10:30, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect
Talk:List of Lactarius species

message: The species Lactarius pyrogalus is duplicated. Dr. Lenaldo Vigo (talk) 19:45, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed one. Thanks for your comment. J Milburn (talk) 20:13, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error 

message: It's Lactarius fuliginellus. See source. Dr. Lenaldo Vigo (talk) 20:55, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, I added it. There's a running count of species hidden in a note at the beginning of the article; we're currently at 313, so there's still a ways to go to get to the ~450 total suggested by the Dictionary of the Fungi. Sasata (talk) 22:14, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another Lactarius species 

message: A bunch of photos were renamed as someone disagreed with their identification.  The illustrations in the table may have to be amended. --Tony Wills (talk) 09:58, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  A bunch of photos were renamed 
Talk:Turn indicator

message: I think A merge is needed as the articles cover the same information and 3 articles are not needed for what is essentially the same instrument. I say a "turn and balance indicator" be the name for The instruments as all terms are generally used interchangeably by pilots and even in aviation training manuals there is not Definite name chosen for the instruments, except for the turn co-ordinator variant.
I will begin merging the articles into one, I am not familiar with doing this so any help would be great.
Assonance (talk) 08:49, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Joe Arroyo

message: 1981 – ARROYANDO 
1986 – MUSA ORIGINAL 
1987 – ECHAO PA´LANTE 
1989 – EN ACCION 
1990 – EXITOS 
1991 – EL SUPERCONGO 
1991 – LA GUERRA DE LOS CALLADOS 
1991 – TOQUE DE CLASE 
1993 – FUEGO 
1995 – LO DIFERENTE 
1995 – SUS RAZONES TENDRA 
1997 – ANTOLOGIA MUSICAL VOL 1 
1997 – ANTOLOGIA MUSICAL VOL 2 
1998 – AQUÍ ESTOY 
1998 – DEJA QUE TE CANTE 
1998 – EL SONERO DE AMERICA 
1998 – FUEGO EN MI MENTE 
1998 – REINANDO EN VIDA 
1999 – CRUZANO EL MILENIO 
1999 - JOE ARROYO Y LA VERDAD: GRANDES ÉXITOS VOL 1
1999 - GREATEST CUMBIA CLASSICS OF COLOMBIA, VOL 1
1999 – EL BAILE DEL SIGLO, DISCO 1 
1999 – EL BAILE DEL SIGLO, DISCO 2 
1999 – 20 ANIVERSARIO 
2000 – EN SOL MAYOR 
2001 – LOS REYES DEL TROPICO (CON JUAN CARLOS CORONELL) 
2001 – REBELION 
2002 – 14 CAÑONAZOS BAILABLES 
2002 – EL ORIGINAL, DISCO 1 
2002 – EL ORIGINAL, DISCO 2 
2002 - 32 CAÑONAZOS (CD 1)
2002 - LOS MAGNÍFICOS DE LA SALSA
2002 – MARCANDO TERRENO 
2002 – SUS MEJORES TEMAS TOPICALES 
2003 – GRANDES EXITOS, DISCO 1 
2003 – GRANDES EXITOS, DISCO 2 
2003 – LO SALSERO DE JOE 
2004 - ARROYO PELIGROSO
2005 – SE ARMO LA MOÑA EN CARNAVAL 
2005 - LA VERDADERA HISTORIA DE JOE ARROYO
2006 – FLAMENCÓPOLIS
2007 – EL SUPERJOE  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.12.67.37 (talk) 12:59, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discography 

message: It would be nice to have some info on the joesón rhythm, as the spanish page for Joe Arroyo has, especially since it is in the infobox. The Spanish page has a good quote about it too (in Spanish). GanzKnusper (talk) 13:33, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The ''joesón'' rhythm
Talk:T La Rock

message: It might be worth noting that this GQ piece (https://www.gq.com/story/the-man-who-forgot-he-was-a-rapper) including interview with T La Rock, whilst observing his full name to be Clarence Ronnie Keaton, makes several references to him as 'Terrence' (as in, rather than simply 'Terry'), in the context even of his mother reminding him of his name following his brain injury, and childhood friends recognising him as 'Terrence'. There must be some solid basis for the family and his friends having used this name; did he just prefer 'Terrence' to 'Clarence'?.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.2.113.37 (talk) 19:05, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Alejo Durán

message: This page has a wrong title. It should be Alejo Durán, not Alejo Duran.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 171.69.75.3 (talk) 16:38, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong title 
Talk:Salopettes

message: Are Salopettes the same as ski-suit? The French article http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salopette seems more like what I thought Salopettes are. --Albert.white 21:50, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, but a pair of salopettes can be part of a complete two-piece skisuit. Dark Claimant (talk) 20:10, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Roman Catholic Diocese of Tarbes-et-Lourdes

message: I removed the French Republic flag icon from the Infobox, in accordance with several sections of WP:ICON; specifically (quoting),
* Generally, flag icons should not be used in infoboxes, even when there is a "country", "nationality" or equivalent field: they are unnecessarily distracting and give undue prominence to one field among many.
* Flags make simple, blunt statements about nationality, while words can express the facts with more complexity. [Tarbes was not part of France for many centuries, and then it belonged to the Kings of France (whose flag was a large golden fleur-de-lys on a white background), not to the French Republic. The diocese was not an integral part of the political structure of the French state].
* Do not rewrite history. Flags should not be used to misrepresent the nationality of a historical figure, event, object, etc. Political boundaries change, often over the span of a biographical article subject's lifetime. Where ambiguity or confusion could result, it is better not to use a flag at all, and where one is genuinely needed, use the historically accurate flag.
--Vicedomino (talk) 03:41, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flag Icon
Talk:2011 Chadian parliamentary election

message: stop reverting the changes!
Information is genuine and Chad is in almost no chance to organize any election today, even a rigged election.
It seems Wikipedia will to disinform the readers, by removing genuine changes and letting old and incomplete news.
:If you have got better news, please add sources that confirm what you say.--Aldux 15:09, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. If you've got any kind of source for that statement, it would be fine; but we can't simply state "elections won't be held due to widespread chaos" without some kind of source. —Nightstallion 14:41, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ergophobia

message: I like the thinking, but I'm not sure we deserve our own Wikipedia pages - Simon
Nice one Simon. I was going to edit this article but it seemed like work so I got scared.--203.122.217.201 (talk) 02:51, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that this article should be merged with work aversion. IjonTichyIjonTichy (talk) 01:10, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:
Talk:X-Out (video game)

message: Also, in the Amiga version, the synthesized voice in the intro says "Get ready for Crossout"
I don't recall this, but the high score table in the Amiga version has Cross Out (or Crossout, I can't remember which) at the top. Shiroi Hane (talk) 18:06, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation
Talk:Aa Gale Lag Jaa (1973 film)

message: IW. Shahid • Talk2me 23:45, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  R
Talk:Armenian National Committee of America

message: The American-Armenians cat was deleted. I think better to keep it as ANCA is an all-Armenian organization in USA and recognized as the greates one. we can say in the many cases it represents the Armenian community in America.Andranikpasha (talk) 14:31, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: i deleted that category because it seems that it should be for indiviuals and not organizations, ect. Thanks, --Tom 16:35, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

text: There's sources, and there's sources. Your POV is in fact made clear BY the sources you have selected, not to mention the argumentative language, and Original Research you've used. Ledenierhomme (talk) 20:50, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: ANCA has pressured Senator Barack Hussein Obama (member of AIPAC and the Council on Foreign Relations) to sponsor them in their political smearing campaign against the Turkish nation and people in their manufactured "genocide" claimshttp://www.todayszaman.com/tz-web/detaylar.do?load=detay&link=132995. It is a part of their attempt to annex more land and international power during an unstable period in the middle east, and has been delibirately brought to light very appropriately, almost a hundred years later than the proposed atrocities, in a time when U.S. foreign policy in Iraq amongst other places can come to change the map of the entire regionhttp://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=NAZ20061116&articleId=3882.
It is also a very convenient political strategy to put out such serious allegations as a smokescreen to divert attention from and cover up the genocide on Ottoman Turks carried out by armenians around 1915http://www.tbmm.gov.tr/yayinlar/yayin3/atrocity.htm and the massacre carried out upon Azeri Turks in the town of Khojaly in 1992 http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9E0CE0DE1739F930A35750C0A964958260http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,975096,00.html.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Screwed-n-chopped (talk • contribs) 01:14, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Criticism
Talk:Teos

message: Coordinates in article are wrong. --Anton Gutsunaev (talk) 20:30, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinates 
Talk:1st South Carolina Volunteer Infantry Regiment (Colored)

message: It is incorrect to say that the 1st SC Volunteers, mustered in on January 31, 1863, was the first "official" black regiment in the Union army. A similar argument has been made elsewhere that the 54th Massachusetts, mustered in on May 13, 1863, was the first "official" black regiment in the Union army, to the exclusion of the South Carolina unit (as well as other black units). None of these assertions have defined what is meant by "official." To the extent a military unit was mustered in the Union army, it was just as "official" as any other regiment.  Thus, the 1st Regiment Kansas Volunteer Infantry (Colored) -- a Northern regiment in every sense of the word, mustered in federal service on January 13, 1863 -- alluded to in the current version of the article, preceded by some weeks the 1st South Carolina, and by four months the 54th Massachusetts. Moreover, the 1st Kansas was actually fighting in the field by early fall 1862, before the 1st SC or 54th MA. However, because of political controversy surrounding the use of federal black units in the North, it wasn't "officially" mustered in the Union army until early January 1863. Dyer's authoritative Compendium of the War of the Rebellion documents all the foregoing, and is reproduced in the federal Civil War Soldiers and Sailors database. For the entry regarding the 1st Kansas (later re-designated the 79th U.S. Colored Troops), see: http://www.nps.gov/civilwar/search-battle-units-detail.htm?battleUnitCode=UUS0079RI02C Therefore, I am amending the sentences of the article that dismiss the 1st Kansas as not "official."  Don Columbia (talk) 18:37, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  1st SC was NOT first "official" black regiment in the Union army 

message: The information box indicates the unit was active from January 31, 1863, however the text has the unit conducting raids in November 1862, and indicates that Susie King Taylor was a nurse for "the men" (apparently of the regiment) from August 1862, which is also when the article on Taylor indicates that the regiment was organized. There seems to be something wrong here. Stevethk (talk) 17:12, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Active date
Talk:Terry's Texas Rangers

message: *At least 3 versions of this picture of Company "C" exist. Three of the men in this picture are identified.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.53.145.86 (talk) 17:43, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Terry Texas Ranger picture

message: Previous revision had the following statement in the 4th Sentence under this header "Major Battles, shock troops":
"At the Battle of Fort Pillow, the Texas Rangers were credited by Union survivors with refusing to participate in the massacre and with saving prisoners' lives." 
This statement is NOT correct, so I deleted it.  Terry's Texas Rangers, aka the 8th Texas Cavalry, were not at the Battle of Fort Pillow on April 12, 1864.  The only Texas troops there were Willis' Texas Battalion.  There was also a minor battle in May 1862 that resulted in the Confederates evacuating the fort.  Terry's Texas Rangers were not involved in that battle, either.  I have several references, including 3 books strictly about the 1864 Battle of Fort Pillow and several regimental histories and history of West Tennessee campaigns.  The only place that I can find this mentioned is a website that is an exact copy of this Wikipedia article.  — Preceding comment added by GearDown (talk • contribs) 02:50, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Major battles, shock troops
Category talk:Wikipedia maintenance categories sorted by month

message: #Category needed
#Articles with broken or outdated citations
#Wikipedia cleanup
#Articles needing coordinates
#Wikipedia articles needing copy edit
#Current events
#Dead-end pages
#Articles with dead external links
#Articles to be expanded
#Articles to be merged
#NPOV disputes
#Articles with topics of unclear notability
#Articles that may contain original research
#Orphaned articles
#Wikipedia articles with plot summary needing attention
#Articles slanted towards recent events
#Articles needing additional references
#Articles lacking reliable references
#Articles lacking sources
#Wikipedia articles needing style editing
#Articles with trivia sections
#Uncategorized stubs
#Articles with unsourced statements
#Wikipedia articles needing factual verification
#Articles that need to be wikified
#Lonely articles  deleted c. 11:47, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Today there are 68 categories. Rich Farmbrough, 16:50, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Today there are 159 categories. --Atlasowa (talk) 10:44, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Current members
Talk:Colin Urquhart

message: I removed the POV word 'apparently'. Whatever opinions people might hold about healings etc, there are other indisputable and documented changes of a dramatic nature. For example the number of meetings increased and the church was packed for most of them, starting from a very low point. This is a dramatic change. Another was the sense of community that developed in what was a run-down, somewhat deprived area, also a dramatic change. These changes (and others) are documented in the book referred to in the article, 'When the Spirit Comes', and are no doubt supported by parish records, newspaper articles, and other material from the time. (Though I've not attempted to dig any of these up.) Chris Jefferies 16:09, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes at St Hughs 

message: 81.109.49.87 added 'Urquhart is one of the many Charismatic leaders who promote the 'health and wealth' prosperity gospel. He has claimed many supernatural healings, none of which have been verified.'
Are either of these assertions justified? I have removed the first allegation until some basic documentary evidence can be found to suggest it might be true. As far as the second one goes, it's not only Colin Urquhart who makes this claim, so do those who appear to have been healed, and others present at the meetings. How do we know that none have been verified? I've reworded the text accordingly and removed the unnecessary clause about verification. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Chrisjj (talk • contribs) 16:19, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Whoops, sorry - I usually remember! Chris Jefferies 16:33, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  More POV assertions
Talk:Bourbon Street Beat

message: ...because that's where Richard Long's character started, in 2 first season episodes..."A Check Will Do Nicely" 3/27/59...and "The Widow Wouldn't Weep" 5/1/59...this despite the fact that Long had appeared as different characters 2 other times previously that season, Thus BBB might be considered a spinoff of 77 SSS...74.79.159.148 (talk) 02:07, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  why Rex Randolph went to 77 Sunset Strip... 

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement.  Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. 💵Money💵emoji💵Talk💸Help out at CCI!  16:51, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem 

message: Shouldn't the "Legacy" section report developments (if any) related to the program, rather than what the individual actors did later in their careers? Elsewhre in the article we read about some characters from BSB that ended up in other shows. That seems more closely related to a legacy (if any) than how the actors' careers progressed. Eddie Blick (talk) 13:48, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Legacy" section
Talk:77 Sunset Strip

message: :Image:77SunsetStripAlbumcover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 04:18, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:77SunsetStripAlbumcover.jpg

message: I have corrected the song title "Kookie, Kookie (Lend Me Your Comb)" from "Kookie, Kookie, Lend Me Your Comb".  The previous text is widely seen, possibly due to it being sourced from this article, but not correct.  The corrected title now matches the name given on the sleeve and media label of the 1959 US single (Warner Bros. 5047) and the front and back covers and media label of the 1959 US LP "Kookie" (Warner Bros. WS 1309).
I verified this from cover/sleeve/label images of the 1959 US single at https://www.discogs.com/Edward-Byrnes-And-Connie-Stevens-Kookie-Kookie-Lend-Me-Your-Comb/release/1574264 and the 1959 US LP at https://www.discogs.com/Edd-Kookie-Byrnes-Kookie-Star-Of-77-Sunset-Strip-/release/4606296.  It was too hard to verify the exact text on the LP back cover so I found a US LP back cover image on ebay where the text was clear.  All instances use "Kookie, Kookie (Lend Me Your Comb)".
Wantnot (talk) 07:58, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct title of "Kookie, Kookie (Lend Me Your Comb)"
Talk:Girl on the Run (1958 film)

message: When I encountered it, this article was making the assertion that Girl on the Run was the first tele-movie, and that it "beat" Fame Is the Name of the Game by several years.  This is rather contrary to what I see as the central notability of the work.  If it wasn't a theatrical film first, then Warner Bros. didn't own 77 Sunset Strip.  Granted, it was only a theatrical film in the eyes of the tiniest proportion of the global population, but, as a matter of record, it was made for release in cinemas. 
The other thing to note is the timing of the two series which resulted from Girl on the Run and Fame.  In Girl's case, the series came immediately; that is, the next week after Girl was broadcast.   On the television side of its identity, it was just an extra-long pilot.  Many pilots are extra-long, in the same time slot as the series, and broadcast the week immediately prior to the first "normal-length" episode.  This doesn't make them made-for-tv movies.  It just makes them pilots.  The most that you could ever claim for Girl, it seems to me, is that it was the television debut of a theatrical film—that is, if you agree with the Jack Warner party line (and, I suppose, the letter of the copyright law).  Even Roy Huggins does not appear to have viewed it as a tele-movie; he claims in an Archive of American Television interview, that it was intended as a regular-length episode of the series until Warner "mysteriously" asked for it to be expanded by 30 minutes.  In fact, Girl's runtime was a rather short-for-a-movie 77 minutes.  
By contrast, Fame was genuinely a tele-movie.  It appeared two seasons prior to the debut of the series.  At 100 minutes, it didn't fit easily into a standard television programming block and had to be treated as a special event.  There's no question but that it was a one-off, which later was seen as the possible basis for a television series.    CzechOut 04:45, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not the first tele-movie
Talk:Fame Is the Name of the Game

message: Marill's book, Movies made for Television, lists Susan Saint James' character as Peggy Maxwell. But in the film, the character Griffin (Jack Weston) clearly introduces her to Jeff Dillon as "Peggy Chan." I will add the film as a Reference as soon as I figure out how to use the template.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by WhyMrLk (talk • contribs) 19:38, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: The name of Susan Saint James' character