lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Mick McGahey

message: Is this burst of hero-worship by 'Rodney' really justified in an encyclopaedic article?--Smerus 06:12, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  ". . . with a distinctive gravelly voice" (as an intro). I would advise schoolchildren to rediscover Britannica and other reputable tomes, and newspaper obituaries. Alrewas (talk) 01:45, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Tribute

message: John was a founder member of the Communist Party of Great Britain and took an active part in the 1926 General Strike. Perhaps because of this, the family moved to Cambuslang in search of work...
:I don't see the connection. Valetude (talk) 00:48, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non sequitur
Talk:Peterson Pipes

message: To preempt copywrite concerns, I hold copywrite to this [], from which I borrowed liberally (why write it twice?).
Do you also hold copyright on that picture of the cutaway pipe?  I'd like to see it in the article.  Frotz661 05:56, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, in doing some research on the external link policy I have answered my own question... As I am the owner of Pipedia I could be construed as having a conflict of interest.
Official websites for Peterson Pipes are www.peterson.com (US) and www.peterson.ie (which is better.)  The given link in the article doesn't work.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.56.123.17 (talk) 14:32, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Defence player

message: Defenceman is a word that refers to male players only.  I propose that this article be changed to "Defence Player", with a redirect to it from Defenceman.  There are whole wikiprojects, Wikipedia:WikiProject_Gender_Studies  and Wikipedia:WikiProject Countering systemic bias, working to make sure that articles are written with neutral language.  I'd like to see this article include all the female athletes out there who play defence positions.  For example, soccer has Defender (football), and could apply to male or female players.
I'll even volunteer to chase down all the 'what links here' pages and update the links in them to the new page name.  How about it folks??  ColtsScore 06:17, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree, defender is a better term. -- Ryanjo 11:53, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Agree, but see Help:Moving a page. If you follow those instructions the "Defenceman" page will automatically become a redirect to "Defence player", and you won't have to chase down all the "What links here" stuff--although it would be sensible to do so because those links would still contain gender-biased language. --Grace 00:48, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Strongly agree. There is probably a lot of gender-biased language in sports-related pages. Maybe this should become a major task for the Gender Studies WikiProject. romarin[talk to her ] 14:32, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Agree.  Clearly, any term using the suffix "-man" to refer to a team member who might be of any gender violates NPOV.  And yes, there is certainly a need to clean up gender bias in sports articles.  Deebki 13:16, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Agree. Consider changing your proposal to Defence player (lower case). Please note also the spelling is British English. -- zzuuzz (talk) 13:22, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Since there seems to be unanimous agreement, I've performed the move. Rebecca 13:30, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Squamish (wind)

message: "Squamish" as primarily article-ized as simply a wind won't do, given the importance of the Squamish people and their language; this whole page needs to become a disambig, with the content in the opening here moved to Squamish (wind).
I'll repeat the above comment and hope some BC editors take note; when I first found this the Squamish wind was the only thing here; can't even remember if the town of Squamish, never mind the nation, had the stub.  Even though the wind is the etymology (not sure, actually; have to ask the Squamish Nation language folks) it's not its primary meaning; and now that somebody's brought up 43-man Squamish and the Squamish fraternity at Rutgers, which should go to the disambig page of course, so should the wind; or rather, this page should be the disambig and Squamish (wind) should be its own page - Squamish wind without the brackets being technically redundant although potentially an English usage (as in Mistral wind etc.Skookum1 16:19, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  A disambig page is the most appropriate result when a WP reader requests "Squamish". --Ds13 16:40, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

text: I think it should redirect to the town - which is by far the most frequent use of the word.  There can be a dab link at the top to Squamish (disambiguation). Fishhead64 15:48, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: This needs to become a disambiguation page

message: I got here bychance, trying to go to Talk:Squamish but I was looking really for Talk:Squamish (disambiguation); the main Squamish link is now a redirect to the town as discussed; but this is where its old talkpage redirects to; what do we do with this content, transfer it over there, or is this page an archive of the discussion to transfer and its stays here?Skookum1 (talk) 06:33, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: orphaned talkpage, I think
Talk:Uniformed services pay grades of the United States

message: * This page is in serious need of reorganization.  Unfortunately, I am not knowledgeable of this subject, so I cannot do an adequate job. 06:37, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: i believe the pay grade scales should be updated, but being new i am unaware of how to post images. gpans 19:31, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I presume that by the term "zero" grades (sic) you are referring to the fact that for E-8 and E-9 the basic pay table is blank until "over 8 years" and "over 10 years", respectively. What this indicates is that statutorily an individual may not be promoted to those grades until having completed at least eight or ten years of creditable military service. While highly unlikely, it is theoretically possible (with waivers for minimum time in service and time in grade requirements) for an individual to gain promotion up to and including E-7 in under two years. CobraDragoon (talk) 22:23, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  pay grade 

message: This should be moved to something along the lines of US Military Pay Grades, probably with a disambiguation page here outlining the meaning of it in common usage. Supersheep (talk) 02:06, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree and done.  --dashiellx (talk) 18:16, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Name changed again. The pay grades do not only apply to the U.S. military, it applies to all of the Uniformed services of the United States. Neovu79 (talk) 00:37, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Right you are!  Good change. ~PescoSo say•we all 00:15, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name Change 

message: The lower 3 pay grades of the Navy have different names depending on the "job" you have (mechanical and weapons jobs, for example, fall under fireman rates). The table only lists the seaman rates (seaman recruit, seaman apprentice, seaman), however, there is also triplets (5 sets in all) for fireman, hospitalman, airman, and constructionman (ie., fireman recruit, fireman apprentice, fireman, airman recruit, etc.). wiki ref: US Navy Rates E1-E3— al-Shimoni (talk) 11:06, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: All of the Navy enlisted rates, ratings, and ratings groups are shown on the List of United States Navy ratings page. Perhaps a note and a link to the applicable section could be placed under the "Enlisted pay grades" table. Also, the "Fireman" group does not contain weapons "ratings," rather it is limited to "engineering and hull." Weapons falls under the "general" group for "administration, deck, technical, and weapons" ratings.CobraDragoon (talk) 14:56, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lowest 3 enlisted pay grades of the Navy 

message: Should the current "Structure" section be split into a "History" section and a "Structure" section? The current section seems like it would be better organized as two sections. X5163x (talk) 18:50, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  History section
Talk:2006 French Open – Men's singles

message: I've recently moved the draw and results into a bracket. If anyone has objections/thoughts, I'd love to hear them. Two problems I've noticed are that it's not always clear who's playing who in the first round, and those multi-line player names sure are ugly. I've got a script to fill in these tables, which I plan to do semi-regularly. I'll get to the women's draw tomorrow. --Dantheox 06:48, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Congratulations on your tables, maybe you could put the names only (as in section 1) and remove the surnames (sections 3,4) Dingy 02:49, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Yes, I agree. I was trying to think of an appropriate heading less clunky than 'Quarterfinals, Semifinals and Finals,' and 'Week Two' seemed roughly accurate. I suppose something like "Final rounds" and "Early rounds" would work just as well. If there's an official name for the last three rounds, then we should use that. Otherwise, we could add the Fourth round to "Week Two" and make the heading correct. A 16-team bracket typically fits on one screen, so that would be an acceptable solution, though it does duplicate more information. I don't really think it's that big of a deal. Suggestions? --Dantheox 02:49, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Suggestion: Final rounds
I made the corresponding part  in the french wiki, using the 16-team bracket, it is possible, have a look  Dingy 15:04, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

message: I am wondering whether players who started the tournament playing for Serbia and Montenegro, should have their flag changed to either Serbia or Montenegro in matches played after 3 June.
For instance, that's Djokovic situation when he played against Nadal on 7 June. (https://www.eurosport.com/tennis/roland-garros/2006/ouch-djokovic-retires_sto900767/story.shtml)
Thank you. 94.63.117.29 (talk) 18:50, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Serbia vs. Serbia and Montenegro flag
Talk:Infinite-dimensional optimization

message: The optimized surface for two parallel circles would be a cylinder, either right or oblique. Here's a paper that demonstrates this well: http://math.rice.edu/~zhmeng/SkewedCylinder.pdf
Mipchunk 06:49, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That paper you are referring to is assuming that the horizontal crosssections have constant area, so that's a different problem. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 14:58, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Ah you're right. What then, is the surface of minimal area that would enclose two parallel circles? It must have a name. Or an equation. Mipchunk 22:21, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes it does have a name, the curve which rotated gives that surface is very famous, but I don't recall that name. A search on google on "minimal surface" or "calculus of variations" could give the answer. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 00:25, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Ah...yes...I should've known, with my knowledge of the catenary. The surface is the catenary's rotation, the catenoid.Mipchunk 01:33, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Minimizing the area of a surface connecting two parallel circles
Talk:Java bytecode

message: Does anyone know why Opcode 0xba is 'left unused for historical reasons'? It's really bugging me, and I would love to know. Perhaps someone who knows someone who works at Sun could find out, cos no one else seems to know. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.7.248.13 (talk • contribs) 07:55, 31 May 2006
: I think I have an answer for that, but it's just a wild guess: Java class files have a four-byte signature at the beginning of the file - 0xCAFEBABE. If you look at each of the bytecode listings for the four bytes in the file signature, you get the following:
:* 0xCA  -  breakpoint (stops execution)
:* 0xFE  -  impdep1 (invalid in a class file)
:* 0xBA  -  (reserved for historical reasons)
:* 0xBE  -  arraylength
: Every other opcode either prevents execution or is invalid. Perhaps 0xBA is reserved so that if, for some bizarre reason, the JVM tried executing the file without reading the header, the program would break immediately. Diego Argueta 19:50, 23 December 2007
::It is now used for the invokedynamic instuction. Nxavar (talk) 17:23, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Historical reasons" 

message: "Jython, compiles from Python to Java bytecode", this is wrong, Jython appears to be a Python interpreter written in Java. Have corrected. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.7.34.73 (talk • contribs) 23:55, 7 August 2006
:You may want to check (or correct!) the Jython article. But so it states, that Jython compiles to bytecode. EnTerr (talk) 20:33, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does Jython compile to Java bytecode or not? 

message: if_acmpeq	a5	branch if reference comparison succeeds
 if_acmpne	a6	branch if int comparison succeeds
i think the second one does not fit, should be:
 if_acmpne	a6	branch if reference comparison fails
--Kunobert 12:13, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  int/reference comparison 

message: Can anyone explain the concept of compressed frame instructions?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.246.75.150 (talk) 12:42, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Compressed Stack Map Frame 

message: Oct. 23, 2012: Every single one of the links in "External Links" is dead or changed to irrelevance. Newbie here, so not sure what the proper editing to do is, though probably not just deleting them all outright. 149.32.192.34 (talk) 12:01, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Links 

message: The statement
The Java bytecode system does not directly support floating point operations beyond 32 bits,
except indirectly via bytecodes that enable use of 64-bit and 80-bit intermediate IEEE floating point operations.
is complete nonsense. First, the article itself mentions the d prefix used for double-instructions,
second, there are no “bytecodes that enable use of 64-bit and 80-bit … point operations”.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.179.86.161 (talk) 10:13, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unfounded statement right in the introduction
Talk:Post Records

message: I have a copy of Post 7306, WLEE 1480, 16 Greatest Hits, produced by Buzz Curtis. It contains Brother Louis, One Bad Apple, Stay Awhile, I Gotcha, Precious and Few, Want Ads, Draggin' The Line, It's So Nice To Be With You (Side 1), Monster Mash, Super Fly, Brand New Key, Temptation Eyes, Pillow Talk, Hocus Pocus, Me and You and A Dog Named Boo, and Signs (Side 2.) 71.208.166.112 (talk) 17:40, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Post #7306
Talk:Robert Abel and Associates

message: Text in question:
“The company was also originally commissioned to create the visual effects for Star Trek: The Motion Picture, but were subsequently taken off the project for mishandling funds.[2]”
Three problems:
1) The source article at theinquisitr.com uses no citations or attributions whatsoever, making use of the article at all highly questionable.
2) Use of the phrase “mishandling funds” suggests “misappropriation of funds,” which is a criminal act. 
The cited source does not in any way suggest such an act occurred or was even alleged. 
3) The relevant portion of the cited article reads:
“Abel allegedly took the multi-million dollar budget allocated to him for the movie, and instead used it to invest in new equipment for his studio, thinking he could grow his company for new clients and create Star Trek movie effects at the same time.”
Note use of the word “allegedly” in the source article. 2603:8001:6700:4FD5:A498:6479:8427:D16A (talk) 02:05, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Irresponsible and inaccurate use of source material
Talk:A Kid in King Arthur's Court

message: The title above the movie poster is currently a lewd play on the title. Please be sure it's fixed, since the page is now protected.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wyattgorman (talk • contribs) 14:54, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: Does anyone have a clue where to find this "rare 2003 interview" in which Penn mentions this movie? Or at least any reliable source that says he was offered a part in this movie? I'm assuming that this is a rumor: the fact that a very respected and high-paid Hollywood actor was offered a part in a low-budget children's movie is hard to believe.
Anyone is welcome to make comments.--Freshh (talk) 04:17, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sean Penn connection 

message: The film was distributed in the USA by Buena Vista Pictures Distribution, Inc. domestically, after that, it was distributed outside in the USA by Trimark Pictures in another countries.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.255.216.208 (talk) 15:52, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distribution
Talk:Kidco

message: Where are the Hopi Katsina dolls shot in home in Kidco now. 2023 192.199.225.146 (talk) 01:54, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hopi Katsina dolls: who owns them, they look like my father's make. Where are the dolls now in 2022? They look authenticly Hopi made.
Talk:Dharma Productions

message: Karan Johar and NDTV are making an Entertainment Channel. Guddu 07:33, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  An Entertainment channel 

message: Hello, Karan, 
we would love you to make a film with hottest and sparkling chemistry of television pair 
DHRISHTI DHAMI and GURMEET CHAUODRY of GEET HUI SAB SE PARAI OF STAR ONE SHOW AT 9.30 PM
we know one can make a better story with them
and please have SHARUK In it as hero elder bro
who takes care of his younger brother's girlfriend (after fight he leaves)
girl has a son by that relationship and elder bro takes care of both of them
when the younger one returns he misunderstands the girl and thinks the child is of his bro 
u can further take this story into passionate love story
we all fans of GURTI* gurmeet and dharishti) want u to make their entry on silver screen 
thank you 
your fan 
Arvind Walia  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.173.53.167 (talk) 11:35, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  new love story 

message: The spelling is incorrect.
It should have been Adharma Productions. 45.123.221.0 (talk) 10:23, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: page move requests should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves. The move request should also include sources that the current name is incorrect. Danski454 (talk) 10:35, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 23 June 2020 

message: Hello sir my self Dharmendra Kumar Sharma me apka bahut bada fan hu sir mujhe sisya bankar kaam karna he , me chahta hu sir apka ashirwad mujhe mil jaye sir please request u sir , dagwooddagwood@gmail.com
8424830810 2402:3A80:187A:5328:84EB:BB9A:E24D:210F (talk) 04:18, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'm a big fan ur
Talk:King's Ransom (film)

message: "Considered a box office success". What a crock. How is a gross revenue of $4 Million considered a success? This film was a 100% bomb. (HandTurkey (talk) 11:25, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: And that one is just The Ransom of Red Chief 86.87.28.191 (talk) 18:56, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Henry Earl Singleton

message: Obviously, Henry Singleton did not invent the gyroscope. As for degaussing to avoid submarine detection, I have strong doubts that it was effective or even feasible. This article looks like corporate publicity.   
- Xis 07:16, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is no mention of his early involvement in science fiction. I take it this is a deliberate omission?Intheshadows (talk) 12:34, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: SF
Talk:List of Rescue Me episodes (season 3)

message: This is basically the kind of summary I want to some day complete for the first seasons. Until I get a dvd box set or something, I'll just make summaries for the new episodes. -- Makaio 07:16, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Heh, you beat me to it! Yeah, all the episode summaries need expanding. Thunderbrand 15:49, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Do you know what Tommy's godson' first name is? I thought it was Danny, but apparently its been changed to Damien. --Makaio 21:51, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I thought it was always Damien. Thunderbrand 22:03, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Woops...  --Makaio 03:30, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Devil'' 

message: Is it worth mentioning that despite Gavin Sr.'s theory that "chink food and birthday cake can settle any arguments or quarrels" it was directly contradicted by Tommy's actions? --Makaio 01:34, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That is true and I never thought about it. I dunno, if you want to. Thunderbrand 02:36, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The chinese food 

message: Tommy did not rape Janet. It was stated in previous episodes that Janet enjoyed rough sex. Tommy knew that was her Achilles heel and used it as a spiteful way showing her that the stability that Johnny, the good boy, offered her wouldn't satisfy her and that he, Tommy, the bad boy, was the only one who could truly satisfy her. If it was really rape, why did Janet show up at Tommy's apartment wearing nothing under her trench coat but her underwear only days or weeks after he had supposedly raped her? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Frame3 13 (talk • contribs) 05:31, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sparks and the "Chaise Lounge Scene" 

message: Merge this page with the other Rescue Me season 3 episodes. Either that, or create a similar page as this one for seasons one and two. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Hina98 (talk • contribs) 21:25, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge this
Talk:Rudi Völler

message: Caps and goal figures in the article likely contain European cup/Domestic cup data in addition to Domestic League data (this is very certain based on this user's previous edits containing similar information . Please correct this issue and leave a note here, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Alfmaster#Footballers.27_European_goals, to warn this person about putting improper information on Wikipedia. --Palffy 21:10, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Dubious Information

message: This article should mention Voeller spitting on Frnak Rijcard in 1990 world cup.  Wikipedia should at least mention good and *bad* points of pserson.  This article is a bit too much hagiography to be agood wikipdeia article 
Franz-kafka 21:52, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Spitting Incident

message: This entire article is poorly documented and referenced. More info on gaming and an advertising controversy (documented by a German language article was recently added. Since Voeller is a soccer player and the addition is about soccer/football, I cut it. Please document it if you want to add to the article. Tapered (talk) 06:51, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Gaming Info & Other Recent Additions Cut
Talk:Connection-oriented protocol

message: They are seperate entities within themselves but i see few reasons why you would want to look at one, without the other.
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 213.55.64.98 (talk • contribs) .
Oppose And how do you plan on organizing their combination? They are seperate entities, and there is no umbrella term.
Kashami 00:59, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

message: Regrding the suggestion to merge into Connection-oriented communication:
*Support - of course. Same thing, and that article is more correct than this, since it also covers circuit switching. Mange01 (talk) 17:37, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge into Connection-oriented communication