lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:B*-algebra

message: I am a bit confused. If a B* algebra is a Banach *-algebra then how does (5) follow? Thanks.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.104.50.246 (talk) 10:58, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with 12.214.16.221 and have amended the text accordingly (with a citation if anyone is unconvinced). In fact, given that the term B*-algebra is rarely (if ever) used nowadays, could we not rename the article itself 'Banach *-algebra'? NowhereDense (talk) 21:40, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Although this page used to be about Banach *-algebras, it should redirect to C*-algebra, since (as you can see in the discussion above) the term "B*-algebra", while largely obsolete, refers specifically to C*-algebras (not general Banach *-algebras).  Toby Bartels (talk) 20:06, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirecting
Talk:Jang Geum's Dream

message: Jang Geum's Dream is NOT a joint production between MBC and NHK, and the article should not say so.
Some Wikipedia users consistently disagree with this, but is there any source that says it is a joint production?
:I have the season one DVD box sets, and there is something about MBC TV and NHK on it.  I'm going to see if I can translated the Korean to English, then find about about citing this text.  In the meantime, I've put a "cite needed" on the "joint production" sentence (before I pulled out my DVD boxes to check, as I was certain I had checked them before).  Hopefully someone can find a solid online source for this fact. Christopher Fritz 03:38, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NOT a joint production between MBC and NHK 

message: Here is the text from the back of the DVD box:
韓 MBC TV, 日 NHK TV 인기 방영작
인기 드라마<대장금>원작 애니메이션
외국어 자막지원 및 풍부한 부가영상
Google translates this as:
Korean MBC TV, Japanese NHK TV dramas popular George Best animated film <Dae Jang Geum> subtitles support and a wealth of additional foreign language film
This doesn't actually say NHK participated in production.
The copyright on the front of the box is: © MBC · SONOKON · HEEWON
There's a Korean-translated press release (Google English translation) from a Japanese press release PDF.
The press release does not name NHK as a joint production company.  At best, it lists production (製 作) as "MBC, SONOGONG, HEEWON Entertainment" and animation studio (アニメーション制作) as "HEEWON Entertainment".
The head of the Japanese press release translates as:
NEWS RELEASE
As of December 21, 2005
NHK public relations office
Animation "Girl Changumu's Dream" broadcast decision!
I'm not disputing that it can have been a joint production, but I haven't been able to find anything confirming this.
--Christopher Fritz 04:44, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: MBC and NHK

message: There is no mention of a join production on  (NHK's staff page for the Japanese dubbed release of the series).  It simply lists 製作 (production) as "MBC, SONOKONG, HEEWON Entertainment".  If there's any disagreement, please cite a source for the joint production statement, since I can't find anything about it on the official Korean and Japanese sites for the series. --Christopher Fritz 21:20, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing Joint Production Comment 

message: If there's going to be one, when will the English Dub premiere? And If so, which dubbing company will dub Jang Geum's Dream? 104.3.132.111 (talk) 01:58, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  English Dub
Talk:Baby monster group

message: Is it related to Rubik's Cube? If not then please remove picture. Infovarius (talk) 10:21, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The Rubik's cube is in the infobox, which is describing various aspects of group theory.  Both the Rubik's cube and the baby monster group are different aspects of group theory, so it is related and appropriate.  I do wish the image was a little less obtrusive, however.  70.247.166.5 (talk) 01:22, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

message: Can somebody please create a redirect from baby monster to this article?  70.247.166.5 (talk) 01:17, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect please

message: I'm not an algebraist, but I see comments in other articles mentioning 2.B as an extension to the baby monster group, so I'm wondering, should 2.B be mentioned in this article, or would it be better described elsewhere?  70.247.173.254 (talk) 03:53, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  2.B
Talk:Hi Ho Silver Lining

message: these are usually copyright - I've removed them for the time being. Linuxlad 13:20, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: lyrics

message: Back in the 80s it was generally said that Beck's guitar solo (which is undeniably rather cheesy) was a deliberate tongue-in-cheek attempt to emulate the performance of rather less talented formulaic soloists. can anyone find a reference to support this?The Yowser (talk) 16:02, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Guitar Solo

message: This aspect of the song is dominating the article. If we can't agree who used it first then I suggest any direct reference is removed, or an anodyne phrase saying 'used by several clubs including' replaces the present tedious conflict! Bob aka Linuxlad 13:20, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, I'm an expat Derby County supporter and I won't accept any modification to this part of the article without good source, and a measure of acquiescence from other club supporters. In the great scheme of things it's a side issue anyway. :-)) Bob aka Linuxlad 17:43, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Some brief points -
1) The article is about a rather memorable song (and that's why I wrote the first stub). In this context, it's use as a football chant is the side-issue. (My reference to Derby County was intended as humour, and to establish my neutrality in this aspect). 2) I have watched at least two sets of club supporters (Wolves and Sheffield) revert the material in the football chant section to show their club as first users. 3) Neither has offered any factual evidence here. In these circumstances surely, 4) it is best to take a neutral position acknowledging that either both or none of these clubs can claim first use. 5) I do not believe you have yet really attempted this but I am quite happy for you to try.
Bob aka Linuxlad 19:46, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

text: FWIW, on Jeff's original totps live performance, which was recorded and replayed in subsequent editions, I remember him shouting "Up The Spurs" at the end of the first line of the guitar solo. I'll edit the article but I have no sources unless someone feels like digging it out on youtube?Jiver2 (talk) 23:46, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: use as a football club chant

message: The question is begged, why did he record the song in the first place? Was it just to make a quick buck?
Jiver2 (talk) 23:40, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: But Why?
Talk:Telecommunications in the Republic of the Congo

message: I added some external links. This article might benefit from indicating its sources - so often, and not just in Wikipedia, you run across figures that are copied without attribution. WRT the mention of ISPs, the WikiEducator page indicates both 1 and 5, while this article says 3 - without the time right now to figure it out (a reference there is a dead link), there may be a combination of changing information and different criteria for counting. --A12n 13:27, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Natural Computing (journal)

message: Shouldn't this page either link directly to natural computing and have a reference to the journal or be renamed to Natural Computing (Journal)? Rorykillhorn 13:34, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The topic "natural computation" redirects to this page, which links to "natural computation".... is the journal or topic worthy of a wikipedia page if all they both do is refer to themselves?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.40.46.110 (talk) 16:36, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've changed the link to go to "natural computing", which covers the topic rather than the magazine. I might also change the link.Ian (talk) 14:56, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  How notable is this?
Talk:Hamka

message: Lack of WP:RS - and only links to Indonesian language websites -  regardless of a long list of publications makes this a stub of low importance - more content in the lead para and more context - rather than an exhaustive publications list would improve this article SatuSuro 03:40, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: A good English language reference would be a paper by Jeffrey Hadler: Home, Fatherhood, Succession: Three Generations of Amrullahs in Twentieth Century Indonesia. It was published in Indonesia, a journal from Cornell University. Gombang (talk) 05:01, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

text: FYI, you can find the article here. I wanted to incorporate the information there in Indonesian language version of this article, but didn't have time. Perhaps someone can use it here instead. Gombang (talk) 07:50, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: WP Indonesia assessment

message: Please look at this source: «Born in Maninjau (Sungai Batang, Tanjung Raya) capital of Tanjung Raya, Agam, a Nagari (settlement), sub-district. Located 27 km from the capital of Agam district, Lubuk Basung; 36 km from Bukittinggi in West Sumatra
AVS (talk) 13:23, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you.  Kampung Molek ("Molek village") is in the area of Sungai Batang ("Batang River") in the Maninjau area.  Checking on various sources, it seems best to provide the birth details the way I have amended it in the article.  Thanks for your suggestions and references. Pmccawley (talk) 22:49, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personal data
Talk:Pelham Manor, New York

message: I am adding an external link to the pelham schools echalk page Dragonfir731 (talk) 15:27, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Why? I looked on that page, and I had a hard time finding information about Pelham Manor. What did you find there that qualifies for a link in this article under WP external link policy? --Orlady (talk) 15:49, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: External Links

message: There was a large history section that was a blatant copyright violation from . I have reverted the page to a version (from 2004) that was before that history was added. --Alvestrand (talk) 13:59, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violation removed
Talk:Nathan Leone

message: The date of birth keeps getting changed to May 13.  It is actually May 6.  I think it's best to omit the years from Nathan and Matthew Leone's pages, since they want to keep those secret.  
There's a discussion about birthdates here: http://www.phpbbserver.com/madinalake/viewtopic.php?t=2878
Nathan was definitely born on May the 6th.  
Unugunu (talk) 22:32, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthdates
Talk:Himamaylan

message: Hi. Please do not take offense if someone else edits the Himamaylan City article. After all, you do not have a monopoly on editing Wikipedia articles. I am an experienced Wikipedian and am familiar with Wikipedia policies. Some of your edits are in violation of these policies. You may not use Wikipedia to promote the subject of the article; non-notable inclusions will always be removed and so with unreferenced claims. That is the reason why I have cited some of the lines in the article. If you continue to remove such references, you actions will be interpreted as vandalism and you may be banned from editing Wikipedia. Please take the time to read and understand the Five Pillars of Wikipedia. Cheers! — •KvЯt GviЯnЭlБ• Speak! 04:36, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Unknown IP editor

message: Editors interested in improving the Himamaylan City article: please take the time to note that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia; links to forums such as Yahoo!Groups are prohibited under Wikipedia policy. See Links normally to be avoided. You may not use Wikipedia to advertise or promote the subject of the article. See Wikipedia is not a soapbox. Wikipedia is not a democracy. This means one must abide by the rules and policies governing Wikipedia. Cheers! — •KvЯt GviЯnЭlБ• Speak! 02:31, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia is an encyclopedia|Wikipedia is an encyclopedia]]

message: There is a discussion regarding the removal of the word "city" from the article titles of Philippine cities.  This may imminently affect the article name for .  For city names which are not unique, disambiguation alternatives are also being presented.  Formal request for page move may follow after a reasonable time of discussion.  If you wish to participate, please post your comments here.  --JinJian (talk) 04:26, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: <Cityname> 
<City>
Talk:Alwinton

message: This link was added and then removed by an editor who suggested that it might be too promotional.
http://www.peterloud.co.uk/photos/Northumberland/Alwinton/Alwinton.html
The link features an excellent panoramic photo of the inside of the church at Alwinton. There is no advertising on the page, although the website to which it belongs does promote the sale of Northumberland-specific cultural materials. The link seems to add value to the article. I'll replace it unless someone presents a good reason not to. Nesbit (talk) 22:32, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Panoramic photo of Alwinton Church 
Talk:Banach–Mazur theorem

message: Is the same true for complex Banach spaces? The article mentions nothing about this case, I find this telling, so I guess its false. But it should still be mentioned in one way or the other.Scineram (talk) 12:00, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Complex case 

message: What is this misleading term "paths" doing in this article. It's like a tune deaf person singing, it's silly. Wlod (talk) 22:51, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paths? 

message: Formally, yes, the interesting theorem by Luis Rodríguez-Piazza is stronger than the original B-M Theorem. Nevertheless, in mathematical practice there is no reason to call it stronger, and certainly it is not a paradoxical theorem but, once such a question is posed, it is expected. I don't mean to down-grade this nice theorem but there is no reason to burden it with false compliments. As nice as L. R-P's theorem is, it is something of a curio, and it is not substantially stronger than the original theorem. (We all know for a long time that nice functions are exceptions, and that they form but a very thin subspace of the whole space of continuous functions). Wlod (talk) 23:00, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paradoxical?
Talk:Banach bundle

message: The definition made here seems rather uncommon.
I think the most commonly used definition (at least in non-commutative geometry) is having two Hausdorff topological Spaces X, B and a continuous open, surjectionn  \pi\colon B\to X, such that each fiber B_x := \pi^{-1}(x) is a Banach space for each  x\in X fulfilling b\mapsto \|b\| is (upper semi-) continuous from B to \mathbb{R}, + is continuous on B\times_\pi B to B,  b\mapsto \lambda b is continuous on B to B for all \lambda\in\mathbb{C}, and any net \{b_i\} in B fulfilling \|b_i\|\to 0 and \pi(b_i)\to x converges to 0_x\in B.
The most famous reference for this be "Representations of *-algebras, locally compact groups, and Banach *-algebraic bundles." by M.G. Fell and R.S. Doran.
An equivalent definition requires a family of Banach spaces over X, together with a complex linear space \Gamma. This might be found in some work of Etienne Blanchard, Dixmier or Nielsen, I'd have to check this.
In my opinion, both definitions should be found in this article in the first place. But I'm not sure how, respectively where to include them. Probably splitting into "Banach bundle (Differential Geometry)" and "Banach Bundle (Noncommutative Geometry) might be an option -- Roman3 (talk) 20:46, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This seems to be a sensible suggestion, except that the article as it presently stands is entirely about the notion in differential geometry rather than the one in non-commutative geometry.  I would move this article to Banach bundle (differential geometry) and start a new article Banach bundle (noncommutative geometry), then maybe leave a disambiguation page here to avoid potential confusion in the future. Sławomir Biały (talk) 20:51, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Fairey Fawn

message: Revised the variants section to match the quoted production number of 75 built:
*J6906-J6908 (3) three prototypes 
*J6990-J6991 (2) two prototypes as part of the Mk II development
*J7182-J7231 (50) is the main production batch of Mk IIs for the RAF, this is sometimes quoted as 48 aircraft with J7184 being the first production aircraft. It appears that J7182 and J7183 were built as Mk Is for some reason.
*J7768-J7779 (12) Mk IIIs
*J7978-J7985 (8) Mk IIIs
Anybody clarify what J7182 and J7183 were and what they were used for, thanks. MilborneOne (talk) 16:54, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Production Numers
Talk:Kalamazoo Central High School

message: Is Calvinball really offered at KCHS? Bigturtle (talk) 23:43, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Calvinball

message: I added a recent tag to the athletic section.  A large school that has been around over 150 years only having two state champ teams seems highly unlikely, especially since arguably the best major league baseball player of the past twenty years (Derrick Jeter) went to school there.  If I could believe the old guy I grew up next door to, K Central was a football powerhouse in the 20's and 30's. I will do what I can with it, but I would hope a student or alum would help. Gtwfan52 (talk) 05:03, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  athletics section 
Talk:Banach manifold

message: can someone please explain, what is 'an r-times continuously differentiable function'? How is differentiability for mappings between banach spaces defined? or is this somehow inplicit in the abstract tangent space notion?
:It's a little implicit, but not too abstract, and is formally just the same as Fréchet differentiability for maps between finite-dimensional real spaces. A map f : U → Y defined on an open subset U of a Banach space X and taking values in a second Banach space Y is differentiable if, for each point x of U, there is a linear map (the derivative (df)(x)) from TxU = X into Y such that [insert your favourite version of Fréchet derivative here]. Put another way, the derivative df is a function U → Lin(X; Y). But Lin(X; Y) is itself a Banach space, so if df : U → Lin(X; Y) is smooth enough, we can rinse and repeat to get a second derivative d2f : U → Lin(X; Lin(X; Y)). Up to isomorphism, Lin(X; Lin(X; Y)) is the same as Lin(X × X; Y). In other words, at each point x of U, (d2f)(x) is a bilinear map, one that "eats" two tangent directions to U at x and "spits out" a tangent vector to f(U) at f(x). Continuing in this fashion, the rth derivative drf is a map from U into Lin(Xr; Y). Just as in elementary analysis, an r-times continuously differentiable function is one for which drf exists and is a continuous function. Sullivan.t.j 00:56, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

message: I would like to add an important fact into this article, but I'm not sure if this is really true:
"Every infinite dimensional Banach manifold admits a global chart, i.e. every infinite dimensional Banach manifold is diffeomorphic to a subset of Banach space."
Does anyone know if this statement is correct? If so, it would a good thing to add it because it points out one main difference between the (inf.dim.) Banach case and the ordinary finite dimensional case. (in finite dimensions it remains true that there is always a finite atlas - which is a surprising fact for its own)
--131.234.106.197 (talk) 11:59, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This is an interesting question, but I think that it first needs a little refinement:  is it true that every infinite-dimensional Banach manifold, M, is diffeomorphic to some open subset of some Banach space, Y? Sullivan.t.j (talk) 15:17, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It turns out that the result is true if the space on which the manifold is modelled is separable.  I will add the theorem and a reference forthwith. Sullivan.t.j (talk) 17:24, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Global Chart ? 

message: I think that this concept should receive at least a "mid importance rating" in comparison to other articles since "low importance" is simply too low in my opinion. Any comments? --PST 07:52, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Mid seems reasonable to me.  Sławomir Biały (talk) 00:34, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, I have changed the importance rating. --PST 04:41, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Math priority rating
Talk:Sixwire

message: Okay, I fixed this page up. I think we've asserted notability now -- they charted on the U.S. country charts twice, and there're barely a couple of reliable sources (including All Music Guide). I think that by now, these guys just squeak by to pass WP:BAND. Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 01:36, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Computer Programme

message: When the website http://bbcmicro.com/ gets some content, I think it should be added. --Redrose64 (talk) 19:15, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested EL
Talk:Samuel J. Heyman

message: Λwondering if this guy is notable enough to need his own page, he is already mentioned in an exisiting article, don't think this adds much --Speed Air Man 14:03, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:DrMaster

message: There's a corporation in Taiwan named DrMaster, and its Chinese name is 博碩文化股份有限公司. The company mainly publish books about softwares. I think this should be noted also. (75.157.142.112 (talk) 06:57, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 
Talk:Ashland, Natchitoches Parish, Louisiana

message: While there are no stores in Ashland, there is Bromar Trucking Company on Highway 153 south.67.72.98.105 18:56, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Atanas Badev

message: Atanas Badev wasnt bulgarian, how can be part of wikiproject bulgaria? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Strich3d (talk • contribs) 18:21, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: On the contrary - he was. --Laveol 20:38, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Atanas Badev wasnt bulgarian, how can be part of wikiproject bulgaria? 

message: there wasn't for wikipedia I would never knew this guy existed :) Btw, isn't "see Macedonism" a little bit rough here? After all Macedonism is an alleged trend that is not widely accepted, and the article would be more neutral without it? Capricornis 00:01, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As already mentioned Ottoman censuses showed the population as Bulgarian. Claiming that someone was ethnic Macedonian only because he is native to the region of Macedonian is extreme as Macedonism is extreme itself. But it would be fine with me if you remove the Macedonism part. --Laveol T 00:55, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I am sure the article will get expanded and written according to the neutrality and factuality principle of Wikipedia eventually, I just thought that the Macedonism part gives a shade of negativity currently. Removed. Capricornis 01:20, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  if 

message: Does anyone have some pictures or articles from the time Badev was alive, preferably in foreign press, so we can see how foreigners referred to him? Capricornis 21:31, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  something from his time? 
Talk:Robeline, Louisiana

message: Robeline must have been a capital of Texas way back before the 1800s. The Spanish claimed the Texas region in the 1500s. Back then, it was just wild scrub land inhabited by Native tribes. There wouldn't have been much for it to rule over.  Citation of a reference for the entire historic part of the geography section is needed. (Entropy7 (talk) 00:38, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geography
Talk:History of information technology auditing

message: USA, "the most powerful nation in the world"? - citation needed. HAHA. 80.244.73.230 14:11, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

message: POV-check:  The Future section is a vague synthesis of unsupported predictions, opinions, and advocacy. I am not very clear on the point being made, but if this is to be kept it needs neutrality, citations, focus, and eliminate use of the first person. 67.130.129.135 (talk) 16:11, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Future 