lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Mononykus

message: Mononykus was originally named Mononychus in 1993, but later that year, the name was changed to  Mononykus because Mononychus had already been used for a beetle named by Johann Schueppel, a German entomologist.
:Mononychus presently redirects here. It shouldn't. Dysmorodrepanis 04:11, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomenclature of Mononykus 

message: Reference: http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1511/is_n1_v15/ai_14891471
You can find more references by searching for the terms: mole keeled sternum wrist
Sittingduck123 07:25, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Isn't the mole comparison an outdated idea from the early 90s? That quote from Storrs Olson appears very much outdated. It is from 12 years ago. Firsfron of Ronchester 07:40, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Similarity to moles 

message: Mononykus was at first thought to be a link between birds and dinosaurs.  It was even featured on the cover of TIME Magazine in 1993  http://www.time.com/time/covers/0,16641,19930426,00.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:2594:6749:CBB:2271:F6C5:6050 (talk) 03:03, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Link 

message: The operation of Template:Speciesbox is being changed to automatically show an extra taxon when the  is a genus, as with Mononykus also showing the branch name "Mononykini" (see example Speciesbox at right).
The extra taxon will be listed when a {Speciesbox} is placed on any page where the wiki-variable  is the name of any genus, such as on this page (Talk:Mononykus) or even a project page named "WP:Mononykus" or placing the Mononykus {Speciesbox} inside the article of any other genus, such as in article "Acacia" where the PAGENAME "Acacia" has the rank as a plant genus. -Wikid77 (talk) 12:41, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Excellent change, thank you! It was extremely time consuming to add immediate parent taxa to literally every article via always_display or display_parents, when for ease of navigation alone this should obviously be the default behavior. MMartyniuk (talk) 18:47, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changing Speciesbox to show extra taxon 

message: Mononykus was featured in episode 2 of Prehistoric Planet IndoBoy Official (talk) 20:21, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Popular media
Talk:Montanoceratops

message: Our article here refers to 1935 as the year that Brown described the AMNH 5464 L. cerorhynchos.  I check the AMNH website to find a '1942 edition of AMNH Novitates that describes the type specimen (see Brown, B., Schlaikjer, E. 1942. The skeleton of Leptoceratops with the description of a new species. American Museum Novitates. 1169: 1-15.).  Can someone clarify this?  
Evangelos Giakoumatos (talk) 18:07, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The correct year is 1942. The mistake was probably caused by an incorrect reading of Dodson (1996) who refers in this context to the 1935 mounting of the skeleton.--MWAK (talk) 08:02, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Description Year 

message: Is it cerorhynchos or cerorhynchus? I've seen both spellings rather frequently, so I'm not sure which is the real one. Miracusaurs (talk) 14:23, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Species name spelling
Talk:Mussaurus

message: "Juveniles differed from adults in proportion in addition to size and mass."
I find this sentence amusing.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Moarjay (talk • contribs) 04:06, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Why? There are lots of animals where juveniles have the same proportions as adults. Mostly arthropods, but still. Many vertebrates aren't too far off.Dinoguy2 (talk) 04:36, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Funny sentence 

message: I'm prone to remove the "popular culture" section. I don't think anyone looking for information on Mussaurus wants to know that it is included in the sequel to Jurassic Park. Given it's relative obscurity, there will probably not be any other reference either. Jalwikip (talk) 10:02, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Popular culture 

message: Is this organism related to Antarcticoolithus? 173.88.246.138 (talk) 03:15, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not other than in the sense that all organisms share a common ancestor if you go back far enough. Why do you ask? Ornithopsis (talk) 00:45, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''[[Antarcticoolithus]]''
Talk:Nanosaurus

message: :Since Othnielosaurus is now a synonym of this genus, shouldn't we use the life reconstruction of it for Nanosaurus? OviraptorFan (talk) 15:34, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Not really much room, but it could replace one of the skeletons. FunkMonk (talk) 15:50, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps this one picture could be replaced, since it's not exactly needed. OviraptorFan (talk) 14:59, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I think first we should expand the article, because with a better description section and one for classification we can probably fit all the images we want in. IJReid  16:08, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, Alright. I guess we can do that.OviraptorFan (talk) 19:11, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, if all these taxa are the same, we can use one of the better skeletal mount photos in the taxobox and put the old holotype scraps in the history section. FunkMonk (talk) 19:42, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Life reconstruction
Talk:Mento (character)

message: What are the specific powers of the Mento Helment? 66.109.248.114 22:59, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It turns him into the freshmaker.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.185.84.11 (talk) 23:22, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Mento Helmet

message: When was he ever a member of the Seven Soldiers, in any incarnation? I believe that is a mistake.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.82.150.71 (talk) 11:46, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Teams 

message: Says he was in issue 7 of the Batman the Brave and the Bold comic, but it was issue 9.
Heathcliff (talk) 01:14, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong issue number
Talk:Neuquenraptor

message: "Standing only about 1.2 meters (four feet) tall and less than 1.8 meters (six feet) in length, Neuquenraptor was much smaller than North American dromaeosaurids such as Utahraptor." 
-- Is there some reason to use Utahraptor as the logical size comparison here, rather than saying (for example), "Standing about 1.2 meters (four feet) tall and less than 1.8 meters (six feet) in length, Neuquenraptor was about the same size as the North American dromaeosaurid Saurornitholestes or the Asian dromaeosaurid Velociraptor." -- Writtenonsand (talk) 21:24, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, that just seems weird. Utahraptor is gigantic for a dromaeosaur. Also, where is the 1.2 meter thing measured from? Certainly not the hip, unless it had a very short tail or other odd proportions. Velociraptor was 2 meters long and only 0.5 meters at the hip. Dinoguy2 (talk) 00:19, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It also contradicts itself. The first paragraph states it was 2.5 meters long. The last paragraph states that it was 1.2 meters long. That's a difference of about four feet. 97.104.210.67 (talk) 17:31, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Given the redundancies and material that was speculative or didn't add anything, I made some rather drastic revisions. J. Spencer (talk) 18:47, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The 1.2 metres height is from an interview with Novas. Conceivably the head could reach as high in an upright position.--MWAK (talk) 08:13, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Size comparison
Talk:Notohypsilophodon

message: Notohypsilophodon or Notohypshilophodon? Newone (talk) 03:42, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 
Talk:Gesu Church (Milwaukee, Wisconsin)

message: What is the origin on the name Gesu? Is it supposed to be read like Jesu? This seems like important information to put up  VarunRajendran
:Thanks for your input... I added that information to the article. Sulfur 04:27, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Origin of Name?
Talk:The Lion's Roar

message: This may be a valid subject, but self-references are considered undesirable in Wikipedia.
Please read Wikipedia's "vanity article policy", WP:VAIN. Thanks.--Nagle 04:55, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

message: I've tagged this as being a non-notable article.  There's nothing to assert this is a high school newspaper as being anything other than one of many newspapers produced by high schools.  The high school's entry contains all the information that is needed on the topic, there is no reason for a stand-alone article like this.  This article would have never been created if the adviser to the newspaper was not first editor.--Metros232 12:49, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I just merged this article into Liberty High School (Brentwood, California). This topic may be notable within the context of the school, and merging seems to many the best solution in such cases. Beside, the article about the school is currently not very long, so it benefits of additions. Of course, the merged part is subject to editing/expansion/deletion as usual. - Liberatore(T) 12:54, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I considered the merging of it, but wasn't sure if one sentence justified a merge or not considering that the other article already had a reference to the newspaper.--Metros232 12:57, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Non-notable
Talk:Province of Catania

message: Hello there! So, this was a former province of Italy. Should we have the information which is there at present in the article with mentions of former, or should we not have much of the current article content at all? (this)  and  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adityavagarwal (talk • contribs) 04:08, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Former province
Talk:John Caird (theologian)

message: This page needs to be broken into two articles.  If no one has done it by the time I learn how, I will take care of it. CharacterZero 05:02, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:The Undertones (album)

message: There have been two edits, by the same user, in the last week who has changed the song title 'Smarter Than U' to 'Smarter Than You'. It should be noted that at the time of the release of the song as the b-side of Teenage Kicks (on the Good Vibrations E.P. and the Sire re-release of the single), the song was called 'Smarter Than U' - not 'Smarter Than You'. --Kieronoldham (talk) 16:21, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Smarter Than U
Talk:Underwater Moonlight

message: I have a vinyl LP of "Underwater Moonlight" released by Attic Records in Canada (LAT 1103). It says "(P)1980, (C)1980 Armageddon Records." Its track listing is as follows:
side 1
KINGDOM OF LOVE / I WANNA DESTROY YOU / POSITIVE VIBRATIONS / I GOT THE HOTS / INSANELY JEALOUS
side 2
TONIGHT / YOU'LL HAVE TO DO IT SIDEWAYS / OLD PERVERT (Dance Version) / VEGETABLE MAN / THE QUEEN OF EYES / UNDERWATER MOONLIGHT
Maybe it's appropriate to have track listing variations included in this article? Or... maybe not? I only suggest this, because it means the Soft Boys' cover of "Vegetable Man" was available on vinyl back in 1980. That would be a notable fact for the article on that song, surely. Anyway, your opinions? I don't even know how to do track listing variations in an album article, so I won't try to change it yet. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad (talk) 15:42, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  track listing: not exactly the same on my copy
Talk:C. Walton Lillehei

message: The information that has been posted concerning Dr. Blalock (and has been deleted) are indeed true.  That shunt didn't just appear out of thin air ya know.  Now I will agree that the shunt was not a complete fix of tetralogy of Fallot, but it DID solve the problem, which makes it the world's first open-heart surgery.  Cardiology didn't even exist in its present form, until Dr. Blalock attempted the shunt, and that was EIGHT YEARS before C. Walton Lillehei attempted a complete repair of tetralogy of Fallot.  Thats why C. Walton Lillehei is often referred to as "The Father of Modern Day Open-Heart Surgery" not as its father itself, cause he was NOT the first to attempt it.  Dickclarkfan1 04:08, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Evil Dead: Hail to the King

message: The grammar in this article is too personal. It sounds like people are trying to make the game sound better by throwing in personal touches to it. Zellthemedic (talk) 06:12, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Grammar

message: I know that it's obscure, has an unofficial name, and I'm not supposed to put down unofficial sources, but this game uses Heavy Iron's proprietary game engine called EvilEngine. Other Heavy Iron games use different game engines that Heavy Iron also made are called EvilEngine 2 and GoodEngine.
Games that use EvilEngine 2:
* Scooby-Doo! Night of the 100 Frights
* SpongeBob SquarePants: Battle for Bikini Bottom
* The SpongeBob SquarePants Movie
* The Incredibles
* The Incredibles: Rise of the Underminer
Games that use GoodEngine:
* Ratatouille
* WALL-E
* Up
* SpongeBob's Truth or Square
* Family Guy: Back to the Multiverse
Here's my source: https://heavyironmodding.org/wiki/Main_Page Gorilli09 (talk) 21:12, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  EvilEngine
Talk:Arctic Region Supercomputing Center

message: I've heard that this is the northernmost supercomputer cluster in the world. Is that true? Fairbanks is pretty 'north' (I live in California). --hello, i'm a member | talk to me! 11:00, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Northernmost cluster?

message: The information that "
The center formerly produced a newsletter, Currents, and an annual magazine, Challenges in Science and Engineering." has now been removed twice -- once by an IP editor with no stated reason, once by a claimed employee of the ASRC, who stated that he was under orders to do so from the director of the ASRC. I have no idea why the ASRC wants to censor this information so badly that orders are coming from the top to cover it up. It is factual information; one can find an issue of the newsletter as a PDF here, and can find mention of the magazine here, among other places, and can see an issue online here... volume 8 #1, so it seems to have run a fair while. Can anyone suggest a valid reason why this information should not be included? At the moment, the article seems focused almost solely on the current situation of the facility, which might be fine for their webpage but is insufficient for a Wikipedia page, which shold have a sense of history. --Nat Gertler (talk) 22:42, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  ARSC publications 

message: Does anyone want to write a section on the addition of Fish to the ARSC systems? Sean Egan (talk) 21:12, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fish Addition 

message: I added a large number of references to resolve the one source and primary source issues the document was marked with.  More than half of the new references are Top 500 references which is a lot of what ARSC was notable for.  LAMurakami (talk) 08:38, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  ARSC hosted many computers which were listed as among the Top 500 most powerful in the world
Talk:Recognition

message: A total rewrite of this page is underway.
You can trust us.  We're psych students....
and this is for credit.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Psyc3330 (talk • contribs) 00:44, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  We're fixing it 

message: This page is poorly written, pseudo-scientific garbage.  I cleaned up a few grammatical issues, but the thing is nonetheless full of nonsense.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.92.165.214 (talk) 00:41, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Garbage 

message: Something on the recognition of states/territories by other states?  David Kernow 05:15, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing 

message: By tagging the article you ought to have some rationale or specific issues. Please respond on this talk page. If you have not responded in a month, that ought to be sufficient reason to revert the tag. --Ancheta Wis 18:48, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revision 01:07, 16 December 2006 StoptheDatabaseState 

message: This page should be disambiguated. This meaning of recognition is no more notable than those having to with diplomacy or sociology and to give only this page for a search result is misleading (it also excludes the basic definition or a wiktionary link). ChildofMidnight (talk) 21:48, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The final result is another disambiguation page of the same word. Perhaps it should  be simply merged with Recognition (disambiguation). Yone Fernandes (talk) 22:28, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation needed
Talk:Repnin Sejm

message: Hi all!  Just wondering if it's a good idea to cite using to Google Books like this instead of traditional endnotes.  Sure this way is more convenient for casual research than traditional citations and it saves on clutter.  I worry that publishers might get prickly in the future about having multiple links to books.  Does Google have some kind of security method to prevent people from reading whole books through outside links?  Also, are the URLs fixed, or might they change over time and become unusable?  (playing the "devil"'s advocate.)  -Wiccan Quagga 11:43, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I admit I did it as a 'shortuct' - it saves time. In my more fleshed out articles, approaching PR or FAC status, I now use proper inline citations - but always try to link to the specific page(s) in the Google Print. Publishers are already 'prickled' with Google, and us using their service here is not going to change it much. On the other hand, I believe that use of such refs on Wikipedia is a both a great exmaple of how useful Google Print can be and a great boon for Wikipedia:WikiProject Fact and Reference Check. And yes, Google has a security method to prevent people from reading the entire book (although I hope such restrictions will be lifted in a few years... but that requires a changes in the copyright law and is a subject for an entire separate debate :)). Finally, I don't know if the urls may change in time: I have not seen it happen yet and I hope if does not, as it would render the entire referencing with GP idea moot.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 17:06, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Open question

message: In the page Repnin Sejm, Repnin seems to be sent to Warsaw around 1766; but the page Nikolai Vasilyeich Repnin says clearly that he was sent in 1763 (the year of Augustus III's death and before the election of 1764).
--Jcqrcd44 (talk) 08:56, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Repnin in Warsaw : from 1763
Talk:Rubén Rada

message: There IS an accent in Rubén. If you go to his official Web site - see link at bottom of article - you'll see there is none when his name is in all caps, like on the home page. This is normal in Spanish where accents are often ignored when writing in all caps. But if you go into sections on his site where there is written text, like the "Historia" section, you'll see that there IS an accent. If you want to get technical, in Spanish any word ending in vowel-N or vowel-S whose spoken emphasis falls on the last syllable takes an accent on that syllable. They may not always bother write it, but a correct writer will. Mona-Lynn 05:19, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Mona, you are right about the accent rules in spanish, but actually in Uruguay we call him Ruben. --Ernalve 17:19, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rubén/Ruben
Talk:Truthmaker theory

message: This article isn't bad, but we could make it more thorough and more detailed, and break it down into sections covering the main issues. 
* basic statement of the principles of the theory (i.e. propositions being true in virtue of what there is and how it is; primacy of metaphysics to semantics); 
* proper account of historical basis (if you want, but the gesturing in the article is not especially illuminating);
* philosophical issues and possible solutions (e.g. do all truths need truthmakers: modal, logical, mathematical, universal generalisations (and any domain so long as the proponent takes the propositions to be assertoric and for its terms to successfully refer, e.g. ethics, science, aesthetics...); and what happens if we reject this claim? does it hurt the purposes of the theory to create an apartheid of truths that do and don't have truthmakers? reasons for/against...)
* truthmaking relation (e.g. necessitation? satisfaction? logical truthmaking vs. metaphysical truthmaking etc.);
* relationship between truthmakers and theories of truth (i.e. obvious connection to correspondence theories, but why it assumes no particular metaphysical position);
* what things are truthmakers? (tropes, facts, objects considered under accessibility relations...); 
* bibliography of key articles/books.
— zenpea 05:21, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Break into sections
Talk:Tiribazus

message: Ignoring the fact that you simply added the citation without a source linked to it, which makes it hard to find the source for the average reader - You do realize that the sentence 'Armenian satrap'  implies that he was the satrap of Armenia and not ethnically Armenian? There are likwise sources that call him Persian satrap , which I assume means that he was simply a Achaemenid satrap, not specifically ethnically Persian. Are you ignore me like here after attempting to do the same ? Or do I just compile a huge list of your disruptive edits and report you right now? Explain yourself. --HistoryofIran (talk) 13:44, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: So basically you nothing to say besides attacking me.. again, great. Also, your wish is my command. HistoryofIran (talk)
See the latest added source: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tiribazus&diff=prev&oldid=952099771
Safrastian, Arshak (1934). "The Itinerary of Xenophon's Retreat". Asiatic Review New Series Vol.30 1934. East And West. p. 686. "Tiribazos was the titular head of the old Armenian feudal family of T'rpâtûnik', with his fortress-city at Khoshab. Xenophon called the river Teleboas, because this very name was well known to him from Herodotus; whereas his reproduction of the name Tirizbasos(Satrap of T'rpâtûnik') is nearer to the Armenian original, because there was no precedent for it in Hellenic literature of the time."
There's no need to discuss this any further.Biainili (talk) 16:09, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misuse of source.. again
Talk:Liao River

message: A map of the river would be nice. Beetle B. 05:27, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed ! Mumun 00:23, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done Kmusser (talk) 20:31, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Alabama Adventure & Splash Adventure

message: Thanks to those who added coaster info and the infobox. I'll keep updating this as the new developments are made public. (I live about five miles from the park.) Realkyhick 05:27, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled