Talk:Ubaidullah Sindhi

message: Kaukab Noorani writes, 
From http://www.islamicacademy.org/html/Articles/English/Black%20and%20White.htm
The present head of the Deobandi-Wahaabi-Tableeghi Jama'at, Janab Abul Hasan Ali Nadvi, on page 55 of his book, Sawaanih Maulana Abdul Qaadir Raipuri, says: "In those days Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani's claim and invitations were much talked about, specially in the Punjab, where few Musalmaan localities were free of such talks and discussions would continue. Near the home-town (Dhudiyan) of Hazrat (Abdul Qaadir Raipuri) is a place called 'Bhera'. An aalim there, who was also a student of the family elders of the Hazrat (Raipuri), Hakeem Noorud-deen (Qadiani), was a close devotee and assistant of Mirza Sahib (Qadiani) and had permanently settled in Qadian to be of help to him (Mirza Qadiani) in achieving success for him and for the sake of his companionship. There was much talk in his circle of devotees and in his sphere of influence of the claim of Mirza Sahib to be a person favoured by Allah and for his being blessed with acceptance of his supplication. The Hazrat (Raipuri) had read it somewhere in Mirza Sahib's (Qadiani's) writings that Allah had inspired in him the saying, Ajeebu kulla duaa'ika illaf shurakaa'ika (I will grant all your supplications except those made for your partners), So The Hazrat (Raipuri) in a letter to Mirza Sahib (Qadiani) from 'Afzal Grah' referred to this very inspiration and promise and requested him that since he had no partnership with him (Qadiani) he should make supplication so that he may be given guidance and his breast be opened up. A letter from there written by one Maulvi Abdul Kareem Sahib informed him (Raipuri) that his letter had been received and much supplication had been made for him. So, he should keep reminding about it occasionally. The Hazrat (Raipuri) used to say that in those days a post card cost one Pisa and so he would occasionally post a card to Mirza Qadiani by way of a reminder for supplicating on his behalf." 
More about the special disciple of Janab Shah Abdur Raheem Raipuri, Janab Abdul Qaadir Raipuri (whose real name was Ghulam Jeelaani). On page 62 of his book, Abul Hasan Nadvi Sahib writes: "Giving an account of the meetings held by Hakeem Sahib (Noorud-deen Qadiani), he (Abdul Qaadir Raipuri) said 'I used to watch him (Hakeem Sahib) recite every now and then the Qur'aanic verse La ilaaha illa anta Subhaanaka inni kuntu minaz zaalimeen with such compassion that one felt drawn towards it. Then, I would think how a person possessing such ecstasy and nearness to Allah can be so ignoramous? But at the same time I would think in my heart that if Allah is most compassionate and most merciful, and He is undoubtedly so, He cannot leave him in such ignominy". During this journey, he also met Mirza Sahib (Qadiani), and he (Abdul Qaadir Raipuri) used to say that he would sometimes say his prayers behind him (Mirza Qadian) and sometimes separately." Khokhar976
I am considered a Barelvi myself, probably because of my staunch anti-wahhabi stand.  However I would say this.  Barelvies often cross line in their anti-Deobandi zeal.  I respect Maulana Kaukab Noorani because I considered his father Maulana Shafi Aukarvi to be a genuine scholar.  However even Maulana Okarvi got carried away in his anti-Deobandism.  So if Maulana Kaukab has indeed said that Maulana Ubaidullah Sindhi was a Qadiyani, he has crossed the line.  However I have to also consider the fact that this quote comes from the follower of someone who was known for his falsehood. Hassanfarooqi (talk) 21:18, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  More Deoband facts 

message: I have removed the article about his connection with the Qanianese.  This is a blatant lie.  Mr. Sindhi was a rebel against the British rule and Mirza Ghulam Ahmed of Qadian was anti-rebel, pro British person.  Hassanfarooqi 12:50, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: All the names of anti-British that you have mentioned, are not recorded in any credible book to praise a pro-British.  The very idea is stupid.  Why don't you quote a Jew praising Adolf Hitler?  you have the same chances are proving a freedom fighter praising someone whom he saw as a British tout. Hassanfarooqi 17:28, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Whole world, except maybe Qadian, knows that Maulana was not Qadiani.  So if you claim so, then the burden of proof is on you.  We dont have to prove he was not.  However you can see from his work on Taqwitul Imam, a book written by Ibn Abdul Wahhab, that he was a die hard Wahhabi Sunni Muslim and could not have said one single word of praise about anyone he would consider a false prophet.  You have to quote a genuine history book, not published by your community, to prove he belonged to your community.  Hassanfarooqi
i think you are right Hassanfarooqi,i will revert this artilce if it needs favour.
124.29.254.13 18:23, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Older discussions 

message: History 43.247.121.134 (talk) 11:16, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ubaidullah sindhi