Talk:Georgia Guidestones

message: Regarding whether the monument was controversial from the beginning, the article's lead section says "It initially garnered little controversy" but later in the Reaction section it says "The monument was controversial even before it was unveiled." These quotes seem to be contradictory, so this discrepancy should be corrected or clarified. Unfortunately I am not knowledgeable enough on this subject to be of much help here. Runner5k (talk) 20:09, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for bringing this up. The cited refs for the lede claim actually indicate that it was controversial from the start, so I have amended the text to better reflect that. - Ahunt (talk) 22:47, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apparent contradiction 

message: Hello wiki-pals.
I just reverted the changes made by Hcmontessori200 two days prior.  The formatting was incorrect, some of the "references" should have been hyperlinks (i.e., citing the relevance of The Age of Reason by linking to the Wikipedia page on the Age of Reason), others were incorrectly formatted (i.e., just a blind link to the Dark Clouds video on YouTube), and the bulk of content seemed to be a bunch of stuff that y'all'd previously removed because it reads like a conspiracy theory.
Reverting seemed like the best move given the volatility of late.
Cheers!
Reve (talk) 06:43, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jan 2023 revert. 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:37, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: Looks to me like the complete text on these concrete slabs could be written directly into this Article. Seems like this Article is more about people talking about the text, rather than the words themselves. Also I'd be more inclined to take seriously the whole "it's satanic" line of gibberish more seriously if the Article bothered to even attempt to connect "stones" with "satan" in an attempt to explain WHY "they say" it's "satanic".  In short, the Article seems more focused on the dramatic furor of the stones existence, than it does on the words that were written on them.  72.181.112.54 (talk) 12:37, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The text from the stones is already written in the artlicle. - Ahunt (talk) 12:46, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Georgia Guidestones#Description is quite a substantial portion of the article as well, with much more content than the "Satanic" mentions in the Conspiracy theory section gets (and rightfully so). - Aoidh (talk) 04:09, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

text: The message on the stones anticipates the destruction of more than 90% of humanity and advocates for it to remain at that reduced state (or less) forever. Much of the world--including a significant fraction of educated people--accepts as fact the idea that there are evil spirits who prowl about the world seeking humanity 's ruin. For them, it's not that big of a leap. 24.1.44.233 (talk) 02:04, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Writing? 

message: This was covered by lastweektonight and can be found at this youtube address. https://youtube.com/AEa3sK1iZxc?si=fW-ktjuqYVN5gfkS 32.221.26.216 (talk) 15:48, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: That link does not appear to work, but the video you're referring to is in the article as a reference. However, to have a section on popular culture the entries in that section would need to meet MOS:POPCULT to ensure that it's not just indiscriminate trivia, mainly by showing that third-party sources (independent of the show itself) have discussed this appearance on the show as a significant aspect of the Georgia Guidestones in some way. - Aoidh (talk) 15:54, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  In popular media should be added