lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Native schools

message: What does this article have to do with The Stolen Generation of Australia ? Were Maori children kidnapped to be sent to native schools?
could someone provide more infomartion on this article, relating why it should be linked to from cultural genocide, or opt for it to be in a different catergory?
:It could be argued that the native schools system was an example of cultural genocide as it discouraged the Maori language and taught European culture at the expense of Maori culture. I think the term is a bit overblown in this context, and some people have argued that having a seperate system was a good thing as it allowed schools to teach Maori as Maori rather than marginalising them as a minority in ordinary schools. At some point I would like to put something about the debate on this page. In the mean time I think the link should probably stay because the schools do broadly fit under the definition on the cultural genocide page. And no, Maori children were not kidnapped to be sent to the schools, so I will remove the stolen generation link. --Helenalex 00:20, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Hi folks, I have been archiving most of the references.Realitylink (talk) 03:23, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archiving references
Talk:American Football League All-Star game

message: I added the proposal to merge AFL All-Star Game MVP into this article.  I would have simply redirected except that some of the information doesn't match so I figured maybe someone wants to reconcile them before redirecting.  (Enjoy - I found this by accident so I'm not monitoring this.  Feel free to send something to my talk page to get my attention). —Wknight94 (talk) 17:25, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mergefrom [[AFL All-Star Game MVP]]
Talk:Rambler

message: I have Googled and Yahooed this but have not found any reference to the cigarette. Can you cite a reference to it wher we can substantiate it? Many thanks. Dieter Simon 7 July 2005 23:03 (UTC)
: http://www.prince.se/sw15048.asp, here you go.
::Ok, well done. Dieter Simon 00:57, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rambler (Danish cigarette)
Talk:Undercover Teacher

message: If the programme itself has no Wikipedia article, how less than non-notable is this? When an article is made on the programme, these few words would make make a mildly interesting aside. --Wetman 7 July 2005 23:09 (UTC)
:I quite agree - I've marked for deletion.  Maybe the photo should go too; it's only needed for the article, and there is no copyright indication. Poetlister 21:01, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, there is an asserion of notability here. Personally I agree that it should be deleted, but as the rules stand this needs afd. --Doc (?) 21:46, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

message: This article survived an Articles for Deletion debate. The discussion can be found here. -Splashtalk 21:28, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Articles for Deletion debate
Talk:Watson's Hotel

message: Should every date in this article be linked?  I haven't noticed that before in other articles.  However I am not sure enough that it is wrong to change it.--BirgitteSB July 7, 2005 23:16 (UTC)
:The first instance of the year in the article should be wikified (linked). For the month and date, it has to be wikified together. =Nichalp «Talk»= 14:26, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The MoS has been updated. =Nichalp «Talk»= 14:26, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Dates
Talk:Sfax

message: ENIS —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kailander (talk • contribs) 18:38, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correcting Spelling 

message: Currently in Sfax at the momment and chatttign o people about how big it is, they all say its much bigger than the 200,000 quoted inthis article closer to 1 mil they reckon, the french article also seems to have a much higher number. Dexcel (talk) 15:06, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: population
Talk:Joint-stock company

message: This article makes out that China and some European countries had joint stock companies in the medieval period. This misrepresents the nature and liabilities of a joint stock company. There are no specific distinctions made of this kind in the article. It simply states, 'The earliest records of joint-stock companies appear in China...' This renders the definition of the joint stock company meaningless. There is then some attempt to define joint ventures and joint ownership agreements in Europe in the thirteenth century which have nothing to do with enterprise trade, limited liability or operational autonomy. These simply are NOT joint stock companies. The first joint stock company was the Muscovy company in England.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.36.51.218 (talk) 00:04, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical context of joint stock companies 

message: Voice 106.206.251.179 (talk) 15:13, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Joint stock company 

message: Perhaps I've misunderstood the concepts, but shouldn't the following sentence,
Without limited liability, a creditor would probably not allow any share to be sold to a buyer at least as creditworthy as the seller.
actually say,
Without limited liability, a creditor would probably not allow any share to be sold to a buyer unless the buyer is at least as creditworthy as the seller. Tedd (talk) 15:44, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Description of Limited Liability
Talk:Belgian Shepherd

message: , if you have changed your mind about the Malinois I think it could be incorporated quite easily. Kind regards, Cavalryman (talk) 04:14, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Given that Malinois is now only 13kb in size post-review, I believe that it can easily be incorporated into the Belgian Shepherd article, refer above support. William Harris (talk) 06:39, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Post-proposal discussion

message: I’m curious as the weather the tummy of a Belgian Malanoy is supposed to turn black or not as she gets older, when she’s fawn in color 75.89.250.3 (talk) 00:19, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does the skin of a Belgian Molinois tummy turn  black as they get older if they are fawn in color  in color 

message: The sources are outdated and from the 1990s and 2000s. Current research suggests firm, dominance based dog training is outdated, dangerous, and inhumane. Rather positive reward based training is safer, humane, and is recommended by the American Veterinary Medical Association as well as the ASPCA. 2604:2D80:7678:300:A08B:6B9A:C329:9DD9 (talk) 01:02, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: A lot of the sources are outdated generic dog books that repeat mostly the same info but for different breeds. Unfortunately their low quality and repetition is what allows them to directly reference the subject - normally generic dog information is not included in breed articles. Traumnovelle (talk) 01:10, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Part of the article on training recommends outdated training methodology
Talk:Ricardo La Volpe

message: Thety look suspiciously like partisan quotes by someone who hates La Volpe. Bona Fides 21:01, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I dont't know very much about this issue, but if the qutes are real then they seem fair to me. Rjm656s 16:58, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Rasta's comments re heavy POV

message: I changed Lavolpe´s stats for Boca Juniors, as he didnt played the whole tournament, he started managing on the 9th match of apertura 2007, sept 15. http://www.rsssf.com/tablesa/arg08.html
http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torneo_Apertura_2007_(Argentina)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.146.89.40 (talk) 17:33, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The stats were missing the Copa Sudamericana 2006 results and it is not the Apertura 2007, but the Apertura 2006.--Bocafan76 (talk) 19:55, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stats 

message: At the end of the World Cup 2006 section, the paragraph says: "Lavolpe's contract with the team was not renewed... despite... The Guardian named him 'Coach of the Tournament'"
However, this award of Coach of the Tournament, as seen in the reference given, was satirical, and, in any case, it is not by the entity of The Guardian, but by the author of the article. The satirical aspect and lack of prestige of the award does not give evidence on why his contract with the team should be removed. Therefore, I've removed this section of the article.
Furthermore, the "tactical flexibility" was not reference, so therefore removed. --Canned Soul (talk) 06:47, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  World cup 2006/Contract with team 
Talk:Carnivore (band)

message: This band does not appear to meet wikipedia's standards for notable music: :WP:MUSIC. In particular, this band does not appear to have notable influence inside the genere, or influence on other genres outside this one. If this is not true, please add and attribute this with sources. Otherwise, delete. Ibanix 08:53, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Influence is immaterial. The band meets WP:MUSIC by having a member of a later notable band (Type O Negative) and by having released 2+ albums on an important label (Roadrunner Records). Hell, they even have an entry in Martin C. Strong's Great Metal Discography. Chubbles 18:12, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delete 

message: Was Carnivore/Retaliation available on Vinyl or CD only?
I owned both albums on Vinyl --85.212.42.48 23:28, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disco... 

message: Don't replace the band's information with another. I meant create it at Black Hawk Down. 71.190.246.97 (talk) 00:22, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Don't replace the article with another 

message: has twice removed the list of members of Carnivore A.D., accusing them of breach of copyright. I've reinstated the list because, regardless of their conduct, it makes sense for an encyclopedia article to discuss them. If there are respectable sources detailing the claimed violation, then a section about that could be added. Until then, though, the article can't make unsubstantiated legal claims, and removing names isn't a good way of going about addressing the issue. I'm starting this section of the talk page to discuss the issue. Mortee (talk) 21:22, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Claimed copyright infringement
Talk:Photosensitivity

message: A lot of articles link to "Photosensitivity" for the skin disease; but this article doesn't talk about this at all...
Srtxg 7 July 2005 23:58 (UTC)
Check the "Interpretation in Medicine" heading.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bon 062 (talk • contribs) 13:12, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: A

message: The dab covers photosensitive epilepsy and photophobia, but those don't cover the whole range of strobe-related photosensitivities. I'm going to add the Bucha effect as a third, but there should probably be some overview of the whole range somewhere. 96.255.9.115 (talk) 20:23, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about other strobe sensitivities? 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Photosensitizing and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 14#Photosensitizing until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  ~~~~User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 10:11, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Photosensitizing" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Industrial rock

message: I'm thinking of moving the "Mainstream Breakthrough" and "Wavering Popularity" sections to the Industrial metal article. Later, I'll write another section to replace those two. Opinions?
Musicaindustrial (talk) 11:22, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moving sections 

message: I think a slippery question here is how we can more fully address Nine Inch Nails and Marilyn Manson. I mean, I think they're clearly industrial rock, and maybe have some industrial metal tracks, but calling NIN industrial metal seems kind of weird to me as I think they have very few metal influences. They were both nominated for Grammys in the metal category, which I guess makes them metal, but I really think both bands owe more to noise rock than they do to any metal bands as such. Though I guess they were both friends with Pantera. Aryder779 (talk) 21:57, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: In other words yet more original research. Ridernyc (talk) 09:42, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thats very constructive... Musicaindustrial (talk) 17:22, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Both this page and the NIN page look retarded because the NIN page links here and refuses to link to industrial metal and this page refuses to act as if NIN exists in any context other than industrial metal. Something should be said here to the extent that NIN - as well as like bands - may consider themselves to be industrial rock, even if Wikipedia has decided in its infinite wisdom that such is not so. - AgentSeven 04:18, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  NIN + Marilyn Manson 

message: "Industrial metal's new-found popularity led to some criticism from other artists associated with the industrial scene." This is a bit unclear. As far as I know, criticism came from those who didn't like the fact that people and journalists kept calling this new kind of music "industrial", as industrial metal and industrial music (the original term) really have next to nothing in common. It's also worth to mention that Trent Reznor of Nine Inch Nails *himself* resented the idea of people calling his music "industrial". 109.58.124.160 (talk) 14:27, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism? 

message: I think this genre's starting point is the song Wardance, released on Killing Joke's self-titled album in Oct.80. It has guitar, bass, drums, distorted vocals and a noise background. One could argue that Cabaret Voltaire's Nag Nag Nag is sounding like industrial rock, but I think it's all made on synths, and thereby disqualified. 
Bjarnulf, Oslo  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.213.30.97 (talk) 13:30, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Starting point 

message: Industrial rock did not start in the late 80s it began in the late 70s with throbbing gristle. It is not accurate to late 80s 67.175.194.26 (talk) 21:22, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cultural origins not current
Talk:The Mantle

message: This article currently reads as a personal album review. It clearly deviates from the NPOV policy of Wikipedia. --:bloodofox: 20:52, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If you really feel this is too subjective, it's up to you to remove or change it. I'm not current with the guidelines for album articles and when I wrote the piece I thought I'd share comments I've heard often about The Mantle. Bobsky 15:28, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Since no one is challenging the point of view or changing the article, I removed the warning. Bobsky 03:38, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've gone through the article and snipped all sections I can tell that are obviously violating the NPOV policy and stuck a tag where a reference needs to be cited. This isn't a place for writing reviews. :bloodofox: 09:38, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: POV
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Skepticism/Pseudoscience/Archive 6

message: Hi! I have listed Flying Spaghetti Monster for peer review at Wikipedia:Peer review/Flying Spaghetti Monster/archive1. any input on how to improve the article would be very much appreciated. Thanks! --Guy Macon (talk) 22:48, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer Review of [[Flying Spaghetti Monster]] 

message: Requested page move from Alternative medicine to Complementary and alternative medicine initiated. Relevant talk page discussion can be found here. Burn the witch! FiachraByrne (talk) 02:28, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move: Alternative medicine → Complementary and alternative medicine 

message: I was about to (and still may) post this at Wikipedia:WikiProject Alternative medicine but to my horror noticed that most of the listed participants appear to be adherents or practitioners of pseudoscientific disciplines. (Shouldn't Alternative medicine be a subcat of this project anyway?) On that basis, my concerns may receive better scrutiny here:
I happened across a couple of articles about supposed health educators (Morris Krok and Arnold Ehret (though with the cross-referencing of edits of their major contributors, I suspect there to be further similar articles)) which discuss apparently pseudoscientific theories as if they have some level of credibility. Although criticisms are mentioned in the articles, many are simply listed without a reason for rebuttal, are criticisms by rival pseudoscientific theorists or are criticisms that the proponents didn't adhere to their own teachings. The more fundamental aspect that there appears to be no supporting evidence or adherence to scientific method does not feature significantly in the articles. Those with more knowledge on the subject may have a view. Mutt Lunker (talk) 18:04, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious health educators 

message: Over at Wikipedia:WikiProject Rational Skepticism, they have an open discussion about revitalizing the project. My proposal is to do a complete merge of this project (currently labeled "semi-active")  into that project. Greg Bard (talk) 20:20, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Narbonic

message: I made some stylistic changes here and there, moving some information from the overview to the character sections for brevity. - Anon. 5-12-06
I'm thinking of editing this page a bit. Now that the comic has finished, it should probably have spoiler warnings about the ending - specifically the character profiles currently reveal the ending(!) However, I though I'd see if anyone else was watching this and had an opinion before I just barged ahead. Anyone? Tim 11:57, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stylistic Edits

message: I've changed the external links in the intro paragraph to internal links, since external links belong to that section. One editor said it was unlikely articles would be written on those subjects, which prompts me to ask why they are mentioned here and/or what makes this topic notable? Fagstein 06:45, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is not at all uncommon for an external site to be relevant to the subject at hand but not of broader interest. The former website of this clearly notable webcomic is a good example. I'm reverting again. TCC (talk) (contribs) 07:52, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If the external website is related to the article, it should be included in External Links. People expect internal links in article texts (and especially article intros) and I don't see the point in having an external link to a website that doesn't even clearly explain itself. Fagstein 07:53, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Put it in the external link section. If "The Nice" is something particularly relevant or interesting, start an article on the subject. SB_Johnny | talk 11:05, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links 

message: If somebody has some spare time, we might replace the sample strip with one that is less dependent on a reader's prior knowledge of the ongoing narrative. The current one is one big in-joke. (I just tried to find one and ended up happily re-reading the strip archives for 40 minutes at my desk. That was great, but I really must stop now.) AEW 18:53, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: New Sample Strip?

message: I propose that the heading for this character's subsection be changed to "ANTONIO SMITH, FORENSIC LINGUIST," as in the comic. --Shay Guy 03:38, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I propose not. Too many misunderstandings among the non-Narbonic fans (shockingly, there are some). Lots42 (talk) 04:13, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Antonio Smith, Forensic Linguist 

message: Added character descriptions for Lovelace, Bill, Seth, Eric and Freddy, Iris, and the Daughter. Jeremicus rex (talk) 04:42, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  More characters 

message: There is no evidence or mention of Sergio in Narbonic continuity, despite previous comics of her mentioned,
I'm not even sure what the second clause here is trying to say, but I don't think it's grammatical. 92.3.26.165 (talk) 22:06, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Mell and Sergio
Talk:Alternating group

message: Schur multipliers of alternating groups are calculated in Aschbacher's text on Finite Groups.  In particular it contains the following two lemmas: The exponent of the Schur multiplier divides the order of the finite group.  If a Sylow subgroup of the group is cyclic, then the corresponding Sylow of the Schur multiplier is trivial.  Robinson's text on group theory contains the following lemma: The Sylow subgroup of the Schur multiplier of a group is a quotient of the Schur multiplier of the Sylow subgroup.
Since SL(2,3) is a stem extension of PSL(2,3)=A4, and the Schur multiplier of C2 x C2 is C2, the Schur multiplier of A4 is C2.   One could also just work out the homology, the cohomology, and the Hopf formula by hand for A1=A2=1, A3=C3, and A4.  JackSchmidt 02:44, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Schur multipliers

message: The link in footnote 1 is now dead.  It should probably be repointed at the current book available from Springer, since the author had pulled all the older copies.  Alternatively, some other reference should be used.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.174.185.105 (talk) 15:55, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  dead references 

message: The bit about permutations in A_n being conjugate in S_n but not in A_n is confusing to me. Is it because, in the examples that are given, every permutation by which permutation p must be conjugated in order to obtain permutation q is odd? If so, shouldn't the article mention this explicitly? 134.58.42.46 (talk) 13:37, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conjugacy classes 

message: Hi all, I would be happy if the article would explain the name 'Alternating' for this group.  As long as this is unfortunately not the case, maybe somebody is willing to explain it on this talk page? Regards, Bob.v.R (talk) 20:33, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this is a very good suggestion! Here: https://mathoverflow.net/a/74220/103598 is a mathoverflow post answering this question. Maybe someone could work this up to a small section on etymology on this wikipedia page? Zaunlen (talk) 15:23, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternating
Talk:Ong Teck Chin

message: On 23 June 2005, this article was nominated for deletion.  See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Ong Teck Chin for a record of the discussion.
the jokers who recommended a delete... have very poor research skills. Chensiyuan 15:22, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A joker (IP 165.21.155.8) changed Ong's surname to "Teck Chin" throughout the article on 6 August 2006. That's rather unusual. If that person is notable enough to have his own Wikipedia article (as seems to have been established during the deletion discussion), then he deserves the respect of being referred to by his surname. The contributor's rationale for the change was that "Ong is his last name", which in addition to being highly contentious (see Chinese surname), makes precisely the point that it should remain as the default for referring to him. You don't see Einstein being called "Albert" in his article, either! JREL (talk) 08:10, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Since there do not seem to be any objections, I've reverted the changes. JREL (talk) 02:21, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Ong" or "Teck Chin" 

message: I have removed the additional details about his family members as irrelevant. Naming them is fine, but we don't need to do mini-CVs for each of his children. InfernoXV (talk) 05:30, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Family 