Talk:Shaul Mofaz

message: In the following sentence: "However, he drew criticism for left groups because of the harsh methods he had undertaken (such as house demolitions)" I think the word "harsh" is a POV. It is a personal opinion and definitely doesn't add any information. Therefore I removed it. 
:Ever had your house knocked down? Tapered (talk) 06:19, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: In February 2004, Sharon signaled the world that all of Mofaz's & IDFs harsh tactics against the Palestinians including totally isolating Arafat, had failed completely and ordered the settlements in Gaza to be evacuated starting this summer. 
It was from the following reason:
# It is not related to Mofaz directly.
# It is a commantary of the (unknown) writer. 
# "Completly faield" - according to who? 
# It is inaccurate. There wasn't any order from Sharon to evacuate Gaza. This plan is still under consideration.
# It is very POV and lacks any encylopedian value.
MathKnight 18:39, 5 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed material

message: In the following sentence: But the most significant event in his tenure was the eruption of the Second Intifada, the word "erupted" is a POV and misleading. The intifada did not erupt any more than WWII had erupted. It was a pre-planned action by Arafat and his subordinates. 75.85.81.0 (talk) 22:09, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV. Did Second Intifada "erupt?" 

message: The sentence: The tough tactics undertaken by Mofaz drew widespread concern from the international community but were broadly supported by the Israeli public. Controversy erupted over the offensive in Jenin, intermittent raids in the Gaza Strip, and the continued isolation of Yasser Arafat is problematic: the crucial content is missing and things are placed out of crucial context.
Changing it to The tough tactics undertaken by Mofaz froze the intifada and saved lives of thousands of people on both sides. They drew widespread concern from the international community but were broadly supported by the Israeli public. 75.85.81.0 (talk) 21:58, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crucial context and content 

message: In the following sentence: Controversy erupted over the offensive in Jenin, intermittent raids in the Gaza Strip, and the continued isolation of Yasser Arafat, the word "erupted" is a POV and misleading. The controversies "erupted" because Palestinian propaganda machine spread lies and misinformation, readily picked up by Jerw-haters of the world without an ounce of doubt about its veracity.75.85.81.0 (talk) 22:09, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another "eruption" 

message: "Mofaz has had the unique distinction of serving under four different Israeli Prime Ministers...". I'm sure that this isn't a unique distinction for Mofaz. Eli Yishai certainly fits in this category. The section should either be removed or reworded to something like "Mofaz is one of the few who have served...". Cymruisrael (talk) 14:58, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Since the statement is unsourced, and most likely incorrect, I am editing the sentence to remove the "unique distinction" language.  The resulting sentence probably does not belong in the intro but I am leaving it there for now.  6SJ7 (talk) 17:19, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Lets take a look at some of the most eternal politicians of Israel. Shimon Peres served under [1] Meir, [2] Rabin, [3] Shamir, [4] Barak, [5] Sharon, [6] Olmert, before becoming president. David Levy served under [1] Begin, [2] Shamir, [3] Peres, [4] Netanyahu, [5] Barak, [6] Sharon. But the record holder is Yosef Burg, who served under [1] Ben-Gurion, [2] Sharett, [3] Eshkol [4] Meir, [5] Rabin [6] Begin [7] Shamir [8] Peres. That is 2/3 of all prime minsters to date! gidonb (talk) 01:59, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uniqueness? 

message: СЛУЖБА (talk) 12:23, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Will he commit suicide now?