lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:French Indochina

message: The second paragraph states that:
"(t)he capital was moved from Saigon (in Cochinchina) to Hanoi (Tonkin) in 1902 and again to Da Lat (Annam) in 1939. In 1945 it was moved back to Hanoi."
That piece of information conflicts with the tabled information (right side):
Capital
Saigon (1887–1902)
Hanoi (1902–1945)
Saigon (1945–1954)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Qlp01 (talk • contribs) 
: I agree, there is a lot of conflicting information about French Indochina after its re-establishment in 1945. Hanoi was re-conquered in 1946 and a number of government institutions were centered in Hanoi, but the Provisional Central Government of Vietnam moved its capital to Saigon after acquiring the Autonomous Republic of Cochinchina. As far as Da Lat being the capital city, I know that it was planned to be the capital city of French Indochina but I can't find anything about it actually being its seat. In 1945 it was occupied by the Democratic Republic of Vietnam so it would seem unlikely that it was the de facto capital but if someone can find any documents proving thay it was the de jure capital city we could change the infobox. --Donald Trung (talk)  19:50, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflicting capital information 

message: , I'd like to inform you that I undid this undoing. While user "" didn't list a reason, I assume that this was because the French leased territory of Guangzhouwan today only became the city of Zhanjiang, while for Vietnam, Cambodia, and Laos it would make sense to list the entire countries, only a small part of what is today the People's Republic of China was a part of French Indo-China. So it would make more sense to me to specify what part of that country belonged to French Indo-China. If my edit is against some manual of style then feel free to revert it. --Donald Trung (talk)  20:40, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zhanjiang
Talk:Stick style

message: I don't know if this is a still a live question or not.  I will assume it is because the merge/delete tag is still on the article.  The Eastlake-Stick style is a particular variety of Victorian architecture, just as Second Empire is.  It should have its own article but this one needs work. Some photos would help greatly.  --Vaquero100 16:57, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I undid the redirect. The stub should be built into an article. Start here: http://www.ianberke.com/architecture-style1.html#stick. Stick-Eastlake is very distinct from Queen Anne architecture and there is nothing about Stick-Eastlake in the Queen Anne article as of this date. The redirect is confusing. If you need to redirect it somewhere, redirect it to Victorian architecture.76.14.68.217 (talk) 03:03, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: If it is redirected, Queen Anne Style architecture (United States) would be a more suitable target, as the text in the Queen Anne Style architecture had been moved there when the article was split. snigbrook (talk) 14:15, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Question
Talk:The Adventures of Rabbi Jacob

message: This article really needs some slight rewriting, it's full of personal comments and points of view ("The handshake between Slimane and Salomon… is a beautiful mark of understanding, full of reason"… "probably the most clever scene in the film"… "of course"… "a chaotic, but sweeping happy ending"…). 83.199.82.153 (talk) 00:28, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Style and npov
Talk:Peter Moore (businessman)

message: This article is almost word-for-word from the copyrited corporate profile.
:Well, it is the only cited source that we have. I don't think it is word-for-word, but a restating of the provided facts. If you have other information please include it. --vossman 17:22, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: During his Space Ghost interview at E3 2006 he said he had just turned 51.  Thus born in 1956. --vossman 04:57, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, if he turned 51 this year, then his birth year would be 1955, not 1956. I have changed the article to reflect this. SteveJ2006 01:23, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've removed this bit: "Before becoming a important figure in the business market, Moore played professional soccer in England."
I can't find any proof that any pro footballer named Peter Moore is the same Peter. There's mention in this article, but I think they are making a joke (because it's not the same Peter). And I know there's a pic of him on Kotaku, that's definitely not pro (nor is he young : )
--Daev 16:09, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Football 

message: Sir,I've received one of the donations and it's worth $500000 USD.
It's confirmed that you've signed the certificate and I am waiting for the United Nations for the delivery.
how long it will take for the delivery to reach  Papua New Guinea? Toroama (talk) 02:08, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Claiming the donation
Talk:Dmitri Bulykin

message: Needs updating. What has happened since the end of 2005 when his contract expired? Runcorn 17:02, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Transfer
Talk:Chick tract

message: There is a lot of redundancy and incoherence in the article, in large part because these two sections are independent of each other and have a great big 'in this and that' in between them. I have no time to merge them tonight. ZarhanFastfire (talk) 03:19, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Two years late, but you're right. I'd be glad to merge the two sections. I think the "Controversies" section should include a section on Chick Publications' Islamophobic beliefs too. Dustytumble (talk) 04:01, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversies, Criticism

message: @Mruanova, along with removing the maintenance tags you have removed every instance of a chick.com reference. We were using those! They are the primary sources referenced in telling the themes and plots of the comics themselves. It seems inadvisable to remove them when they were serving a purpose. Primary sources are better than no sources at all. Elizium23 (talk) 22:44, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Please go ahead and revert my changes. I apologize. Sorry. Mruanova (talk) 00:07, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I added the primary sources tag and did some cleanup as well earlier in the month but if at this point the use of them is largely valid, please feel free to remove it.  It is likely better to only tag specific instances where their use is problematic rather a broad tag at the article level anyway.  S0091 (talk) 19:02, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

text: I agree with Butlerblog, the removals of all instances is not the solution and certainly not bloating the EL section as that is against the purpose of an EL section.  I have removed the tag because perhaps it was causing more confusion than really resolving anything.  S0091 (talk) 19:33, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gutted 

message: Seeing
"
Chick Publications produces and markets the Chick tracts, along with other comic books, books, and posters.
"
should there be new wiki pages for the Chick Publications, separate from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chick_tract
page?
That way the Chick_tract wiki page can focus on the tracks, the Chick_Publications wiki page can focus on that company, and more pages if needed can also be made for the comic books, videos, posters, audio books, art prints and any other products of this company.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Other Cody (talk • contribs) 21:13, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not to suppress your enthusiasm, but we don't create articles simply because something exists.  There must be enough notability for something to have an article (see WP:GNG).  Beyond that, there must be enough content to warrant a separate article.  At this point, that's not the case (see WP:SPLITTING). ButlerBlog (talk) 21:42, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chick Publications
Talk:The Montauk Project: Experiments in Time

message: OK this has been moved over from the main Montauk Project entry as it was editted to be purely about the book. However, it does need cleaning up. I mentioned some of this on the Montauk Project talk page but thought it best to open up the discussion here too. What I'd suggst is moving some of the material back to the main entry so this is purely focused on the books. I'm going to lift the mentions of the X Files and Eternal Sunshine and put it in a media section. Any other ideas? (Emperor 17:05, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Tidy up

message: What's the time travel conceit ?  RJFJR (talk) 14:13, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: A literary conceit is a premise that is treated as true for the purposes of creating the reality that a novel is set in, particularly when this premise is used as a framing device. Time travel means that the proper time of a physical body and that of its immediate surroundings exhibit a discontinuity. 2A01:CB0C:CD:D800:65C6:12C9:B6E6:A9A3 (talk) 08:56, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: time travel conceit
Talk:Vaginitis

message: Ok, the section on identification by color goes from color to all other forms of identification EXCEPT color.  I think we have a problem there. SadanYagci (talk) 20:37, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved the ICD codes to Diagnosis - better? - Eldereft ~(s)talk~ 23:38, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Colors?

message: This is in regards primarily to Northrup's quotation: “some women respond to a perceived boundary violation with a vaginal infection.”
Sounds eerily similar to that whole "If a woman gets raped, her body will reject the sperm and she won't get pregnant!" crap that flew around a while back. This is utter bullshit, probably. It needs a more reliable source, or should at least be prefaced with "holistic medicine practitioner Northrtup..."
Excuse my language, but it is kind of infuriating that someone with an MD can still be so stupid. - Sweet Nightmares 20:41, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The "dubious - discuss" tag had been on there since May 2015. I have just removed it and used the word "claimed" to show that this is not concretely proven. Northrup's book is a feel-good self-help book, not a professional medical text. Equinox (talk) 00:49, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disputed statement 

message: I watch TV several times a day and they spam a commercial about this condition several times on TV. Are their claims validated? It seems the medication name on TV they mention should have a link to this article as well if there is not already a medication on WP that goes in details about its treatment options JasonHockeyGuy (talk) 05:28, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commercial Spam on TV. 

message: What does it mean? Equinox (talk) 00:41, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why does "colpitis" redirect here? 

message: Comments?
* Support merge. Barbara (WVS) ✐ ✉ 00:24, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge [[Vaginitis]] and [[Aerobic vaginitis]]
Talk:BioScience

message: This article should be renammed "Biosciences (Journal)", to avoid the confusion of the subject -a journal- with the term 'Bioscience(s)' that is more generally accepted in the scientific and technical community, to design collective sciences related to Biology (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biosciences redirects Biology page). See Biosciences (disambiguation).
Eboireau (talk) 12:38, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Pasur (card game)

message: I could swear that this article used to exist before I (re?)created it...Morganfitzp 17:08, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Created

message: I am pretty sure no such rule existed
*3. A player that already has a total score of 50 or above may NOT score any more "surs" for the remainder of the game
I removed it from the rules.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alisny (talk • contribs) 02:42, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, article is desperately in need of references.  Morganfitzp (talk) 21:02, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Surs
Talk:American Institute of Biological Sciences

message: With this edit, it was added a 2018 free paper which sources the way in which applications are funded by the Institute.
The paper follows a phase of open peer review and it is claims to be an original research with a  more general character, testing a possible correlation between expected risk-return balance of the paper and its higher probability to meet a higher degree of disagreement between the peer reviewers' evaluations.Hope this helps for other WP articles.Micheledisaveriosp (talk) 23:29, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section "Processes"
Talk:Jesse Bogdonoff

message: Bogpilled
It seems fairly obvious that the material presented here is quite sympathetic to Mr. Bogdonoff, to the point of POV. Sourcing would be ideal. Lucidish 17:12, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: First: "sympathy" and "POV" does not mean "omg lies" or "you're wrong". It means, first of all, source segments like: "In 2001 he learned that Herchel Hyatt, the owner of Millenium Asset Management Company, had stolen millions of Tonga's money and had filed a false accounting statement for the Tonga account. Bogdonoff arranged a recovery program for Tonga backed by Lloyds of London to protect against the losses... The Tongan government officials rejected the plan and stated that this money had been intended to improve the nation's infrastructure. They therefore proceeded to sue Bogdonoff and all the parties involved in the transaction for misappropriation." Neither citation cover those items. Second, the exact accusations which the government of Tonga made -- and which are a staple in both cited articles -- is necessary. Lucidish { Ben S. Nelson } 02:37, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

message: Is he Ashkenazi Jewish? I can only assume so. 149.71.163.206 (talk) 15:40, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biographical / Demographical Information
Talk:Ma On Shan

message: Just search google, Ma On Shan even has its own town center. Whatever it has been in the past (how it's planned) is irrelevant, what's important is what is is now. Hunter 17:15, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yet it is part of Sha Tin New Town. There are 9 new towns territory-wide. — Instantnood 18:05, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Is your mind still stuck in the past??? See what the government says  Quote: "...Ma On Shan has developed into a new town full of buildings...". Hunter 18:21, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The yearbook says " Sha Tin new town embraces the areas of Sha Tin and Ma On Shan. "   (note: 2004 is the latest published version) — Instantnood 19:08, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It says that because it's an extention to Sha Tin Town development, now it is a new town. , there are numberous references of "Ma On Shan New Town" in many government & legco pages. Hunter 19:16, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

text: It's a new town, yet it's part of the Sha Tin New Town. Is it fine to modify it as " - a new town, an extension of the Sha Tin New Town in the Sha Tin District, beneath Ma On Shan mountain "? — Instantnood 19:22, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Ma On Shan = New Town

message: The term refers to both the town and the mountain. A dab here is not necessary.--Jiang 00:56, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What Ma On Shan (the area) refers to does not overlap with Ma On Shan (the mountain). The area was named after the mountain, and it happens they are adjacent (and perhaps partially overlapped) with each other. — Instantnood 20:44, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Agree. It's just like Tsz Wan Shan, which is both an area and a hill (at least they share the same name in Chinese). --minghong 09:58, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Association of Information Technology Professionals

message: Is it just me, or does the entire history section come right out of the official website's history page ? Folkor 17:19, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagarism 

message: It looks like this page is an ad and needs to be cleaned. Someone should flag it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.200.168.34 (talk) 16:20, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: considerable further modification was needed. In particular, information must not be copied from the web site of the organization. As reviewing admin, I am truly amazed that the article has persisted in this   impermissible form for so many years.  I therefore deleted it as a copyright violation--but, since I realise its importance, I decided instead simply to totally rewrite it. It still needs some references from outside sources. DGG (talk) 21:32, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Ad
Talk:Cylon (2003 model)

message: This article was split from Cylon (Battlestar Galactica) without forwarded links or disambiguation page, such that the 1978 "Cylon" article became the only one that could be found searching for "Cylon".  I've merged the two articles back into one again and suggest the splitter discuss this split on the talk page there before doing so again.  I for one think the single article is better for this subject, and could be shortened primarily by linking the individual humanoid cylon pages and reducing their size in the main paragraph - Markeer 17:24, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:Suicides by method

message: Shall we call this "suicide methods" instead to go in line with the article? Skinnyweed 17:25, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope. "Suicide methods" would refer to particular methods of suicide. This category already exists - :Category:Suicide. This category lists people who committed suicide, ordered by various methods. --GreyCat 22:13, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name change
Talk:Assault Suits Valken

message: I've never edited a page to the extent that this one needs, all I've ever done is list Assault Suits Valken under Satoshi Urushihara's work. In fact I don't know anything about how to edit a wiki article. Just writing this in the talk page has taken quite a bit of learning.
This article is about the game 'Cybernator', not 'Assault Suits Valken'
The character names are INCORRECT, those are NOT the listed names of CYBERNATOR, those are the listed names of the 'Fan Translation' of ASSAULT SUITS VALKEN, all names are official (According to the GAME, not fans).
And the name 'Crea' was not a mistranslation, she is listed as 'Crea Coral' in Satoshi Urushihara's artbook, character designer for the game.
The whole characters section needs to be redone; Again, this article is about 'Cybernator', not 'Assault Suits Valken'
The characters/names listed in the artbook are as follows:
Jake Brain, Crea Coral, Alef Berdach, Geltz, Chack Jonston, Schermark.
(The 3 other characters 'Herman', and 'Apollo/Kurt', and the unknown soldier are not included in the art book.)
(If Need be, I can provide links to the pages.)
Although I do believe that their should be information about Valken, here, instead of creating a page for it. Maybe have a differences section?
I'd also like to see where some one got the information that Valken takes place 10 years before the first Leynos*.
For now, I will add both sets of names to the character section.
*Any input on this would be nice, this is one of my favorite series of games. ::Maegra:: 24.130.162.164 (talk) 09:37, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, since this game was already professionally translated and marketed commercially in North America. I don't find the fan translated names to be very notable, especially considering the official artbook names.地炎風水闇陽 (Talk) 18:11, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  This needs a re-write 

message: A screen shot of the gempaly would be nice.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jernqvist (talk • contribs) 16:49, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Screen shot 

message: I always wondered, why on Earth did they remove the character pictures? Wouldn't this have helped to understand who is talking??? Or did they just look too much like anime and therefore had to be taken out?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:2028:525:1E01:466:D7DE:6749:C991 (talk) 11:31, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Censorship 

message: Superplay calls him the "Creator" of this game. Given how loose the gaming media is about the term "creator", I've intentionally not used that language on this page. I kept it down to the basic facts: his role as producer, and his later role in Front Mission. What his actual role in this game is, I'm not sure. As producer he'd be the manager, and likely started the project. Possibly came up with the scenario? He later wrote Front Mission, so it's not impossible. Harizotoh9 (talk) 21:47, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Toshiro Tsuchida
Talk:Upanayanam

message: I feel that the following sentense in the article is objectionable.
"The Upanayana is a Hindu samskara for children of the three highest castes."
Using the words "highest caste" will downplay the other castes.
All the castes should be looked equally. I dont like to bring racism.
(I am a kshatryia, but I dont like calling other castes as lower castes)
Coming to the last paragraph, 
I do not support the concept of seeing upanayana as an identity of a cast. 
It is true that only three casts perform the ritual,
but I think that the last paragraphs is un-necessary.
sunils 17:32, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Yuma Territorial Prison

message: deleted picture of "prison cart" as this is not a historical cart related to the prison in any way; merely it was created by park staff to use in a parade to promote the park.--130.13.147.30 17:35, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Regent's Park College, Oxford

message: Should Alexandra Knatchbull be included in "Distinguished Old Members"? She appears to be a graduate of the college, but I don't know if she counts as "distinguished", or just slightly famous. If somebody else wants to add her, fine, but I shan't do so myself.
----
NB: in case anybody was thinking of changing it back, there is no need to have "Dr" in front of somebody's name if you have "DPhil" (etc) after it! In fact, to do so looks messy and is wrong really. Same goes for Professor.
: What do you mean by "Same goes for Professor"?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.153.242.77 (talk) 23:03, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alexandra Knatchbull 

message: What does "one of the only" mean in the sentence "It is one of the only academic institutions within the University of Oxford to have accepted women as well as men since before the mid-twentieth century, with women attending the College since the 1920s." 109.153.242.77 (talk) 23:01, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  one of the only 
Talk:Vortex (video game)

message: I came to this article because of this citation which put this article in .
That citation uses :
:
which improperly uses  in .  At the top of the  documentation page is a notice box with this image: .   is not to be used in cs1|2 template parameters that contribute to the citation's metadata (see list contributing parameters here) because use of  in parameters that contribute to the metadata will corrupt the metadata.
When used in  as is done in the above example,  produces this:
:
The only thing that should be in  is the magazine's name.  The magazine's name may be wikilinked:
:
:
:
Because of the noted proscription, I deleted  templates from the  templates.  As part of that I also removed most (not all – I missed a couple)  parameters from the  templates per the   documentation which reads, in part: "Not normally used for periodicals."
Editor KGRAMR  with the edit summary   I disagree for the reasons stated above and believe that my edit should be restored.
—Trappist the monk (talk) 15:41, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, i'll restore your edit myself... Roberth Martinez (talk) 15:46, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Done! I've restored your edit. Roberth Martinez (talk) 15:48, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  revert