lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Waste legislation

message: I have unilaterally decided to merge this page into the Waste law page in the Environmental Law portals. I believe this will be non-controversial.
Ado2102 (talk) 18:16, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger info 

message: I added some information just on US stuff, mostly regarding laws that are notable enough to have a wikipedia entry.  --Rocksanddirt 03:35, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  US Laws and stuff 

message: As currently constituted this is a list. I hope that it develops further as an article... DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 09:46, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article or list?
Talk:Gerry Alanguilan

message: Gerry is the face behind the highly popular "Hey, baby" youtube video. Here is a news story about it:
http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/global-filipino/12/07/10/filipino-internet-sensation-british-tv
Whoever contributes to this page can add information about the fame of the video if they like. I don't have time to do it myself. --Ghostexorcist (talk) 22:55, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hey, baby 
Talk:Beefeater Gin

message: Hm...the problem with the Yeoman Warder article is that the uniforms are clearly not the ones on the bottle, but the Yeoman of the Guard has good pictures of the uniform.  I'll revert for now, I guess.  Salanth 10:47, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a good remark, I'm changing it to Yeoman of the Guard. Cf. Beefeater_(disambiguation): "Beefeater is a term often used to refer to the Yeomen Warders of the Tower of London, but originally referring to the Yeomen of the Guard" (various online dictionaries support the correction of this statement). Ngfio (talk) 20:12, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The bottle I have here says 47% ABV. So unless the export product is stronger, I'll be changing this. Counterfit 22:02, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  ABV 

message: The article is self-contradicting.  It says "40% ABV" but 94 proof.  One of them has to be wrong.  As far as I know, all Beefeater Gin is 94 proof (47% ABV). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.7.24.5 (talk) 05:41, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article is self-contradicting (ABV and proof) 

message: "Hi David,
Yes the alcohol strength of Beefeater in the USA and Duty Free is 47%. Dutyfree is higher because traditionally this channel sold at higher strength as they were not restricted by tax. The US has historically always been at 47%.
The rest of the world including the UK is at 40%. Both strengths are excellent products and have won numerous awards.
I hope this answers your question.
Kind regard,
Jo Smith" Zanyspydude 13:53, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  I was curious about the ABV so i sent an email to the company, here is the response: 

message: The website for the Yeoman of the Guard (yeomenoftheguard.com) includes the following comment regarding Yeoman Warders:
"On ceremonial occasions they wear the exact same scarlet-red State Dress [as Yeoman of the Guard], minus the cross-belt, but their day-to-day duties are carried out in the Blue Undress"
It includes pictures of Yeomen of the Guard State Dress and both State and Blue Undress for the Yeoman Warders.
Based on the labels in the article, the picture is indeed a "Beefeater" and not a Yeoman of the Guard. 122.107.58.27 (talk) 05:19, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beefeater Uniform and the label
Talk:List of regiments of the Indian Army (1922)

message: I am trying to get rid of all the red links anyone who can assist is very welcome Jim Sweeney (talk) 21:32, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  RED LINKS 

message: For the main articles, we clearly do need to distinguish between the modern Indian Army and the army of British India, but I don't see any need for "British" in the name of this list. Does anyone have any comments on "List of regiments of the Indian Army (1922)" as a name? Xn4 (talk) 01:51, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll leave it another day or two before renaming. Xn4 (talk) 04:07, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed move

message: This article has no sources and that makes me sad
128.12.252.4 (talk) 09:16, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources? 
Talk:List of waste types

message: Shouldn't this be a Category?
--Stuartyeates 11:06, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This taxonomy needs a bit of work, as it's confusing to have
retail hazardous waste and household hazardous waste both here, 
when they seem to be the same thing. 174.101.136.61 (talk) 17:16, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consolidation needed 

message: there are many wastes with different names and same link.
for example:- biomedical waste, medical waste and clinical waste. there are some others too. I removed one which were heat waste and waste heat so i removed heat waste as it led to the same page and was not really a different category. If I was mistaken in removing it, please undo my edit and please look into the matter of the names. Apurvgupt (talk) 10:39, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming of Wastes 

message: Use bricks  ROHIT RAUT (talk) 05:52, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Garbage
Talk:Drużno

message: It wouldnt be assumed to be Venetic as defined by Wikipedia, as that was Italic or close to it. The author probably means Wendish, as the Wends were referenced under the ancient name Venedi, which looks like Veneti. There are a group of similar names like this in widely scattered cultures and some oversynthesizers have wanted to connect them. There's no evidence beyond the name that they are connected. If they were it would have to have been in proto-IE times. But, that is a whole different topic.
Wendish was Slavic, so there is no need to repeat it. I commented that out for the time being.
Slavic is a pretty creditable theory. At that early date it is more likely to have been proto-Slavic or early Wendish. The first lake goes back to before Slavic. Polish is certainly out. But, maybe there is another creditable theory, such as early western Baltic. If I find one I will put it in.Dave 11:26, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Venetic
Talk:Steve Downes

message: I offer a prize to whomnever gets a pic. -- 68.228.33.74 11:24, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, had to delete that one, please consult the image use policy (and related topics) before uploading images. Uploads have to be either free content (permission to use is not sufficient to be free content, modifications, commercial use and redistribution all have to be explicitly allowed to qualify as that) or fulfill the requirements of our fair use policy to be included. --Sherool (talk) 21:43, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: My understanding was that Steve Downes was well-known to the older members of Bungie, as many of them were Chicago natives and the company was based in Chicago from its inception in 1990 until 2000 when they were bought by Microsoft and transplanted to Redmond, WA. That they cast him in the role of Master Chief because they were long-time fans of Downes' voice as a DJ, not because of a minor role he played in an obscure video game from 1999. If what's stated in the article is true, then someone should be able to find citation for it without too much trouble. Druff 03:29, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Downes landing role of Master Chief- citation needed 

message: This page needs more info~(74.163.16.27)~-Tailsman67 of Sonic News Network and others  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.163.17.213 (talk) 23:13, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: How old is this guy and we need a PUCTURE!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.44.144.190 (talk) 16:17, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info 

message: Why are they listed, as there is no information suggesting that there will be a Halo 5 or 6?Wzrd1 (talk) 22:14, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Halo 5 and Halo 6
Talk:South Lebanon conflict (1985–2000)

message: It was an occupation. Why is this article titled conflict? Lebanesebebe123 (talk) 16:47, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: See Israeli occupation of Southern Lebanon for that aspect. Selfstudier (talk) 16:52, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Why are they seperate articles? Lebanesebebe123 (talk) 15:56, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Basic logic. This page is about Hezbollah's fight against the occupation; thus a conflict between Hezbollah and the IDF. EgyptianNationalist (talk) 08:04, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: That’s not basic logic. It’s not clear. And there needs to be a mention to the other article in the intro. Lebanesebebe123 (talk) 04:06, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

text: This article is misleading. In order for it to not be misleading from what the 1985 conflict was- Israeli occupation of south Lebanon, that article needs to be mentioned in the intro. Otherwise readers will be left thinking it was a conflict and not an occupation. Regardless of who was fighting who Lebanesebebe123 (talk) 04:08, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict?  

message: There should be mention of this article- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli_occupation_of_Southern_Lebanon
in intro. Otherwise article is misleading. Lebanesebebe123 (talk) 04:09, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article should mention the occupation of south Lebanon by Israel.
Talk:Decriminalised parking enforcement

message: Just a note that the Transport Committee Transport - Seventh Report: Parking Policy and Enforcement has similar but different wording for the sixth paragraph of its summary and point 103 of the conclusion and recommendations. Softgrow 11:26, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And also, to clarify comments in the edit history, note that the Report in Section 5 also has a paragraph 103 which does not mention these points. -De Facto 11:43, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Reform Quote

message: "The situation is further complicated by the fact that this latest ruling superficially conflicted with the Metric Martyrs case ruling on the status of the Bill of Rights, but no further appeals are pending"
I was under the impression that there was some kind of case pending on this issue, read about it in one of the newspapers over the summer. The use of the word "superficially" implies that some ruling has occured to stop any further appeal; can anyone confirm, otherwise the use of the word surely represents bias - someone's own opinion on a legal matter. 
Graldensblud 15:42, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: English Bill of rights arguement

message: The correct term is now Civil Parking Enforcement and the relevant legislation is the Traffic Management Act 2004.The relevant territory is England and Wales not the UK, different legislation applies to Northern Ireland and Scotland. --MBRZ48 (talk) 17:25, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Article out of date, territory is incorrect 
Talk:Call gate (Intel)

message: This was previously a transwikied dicdef; I have now fleshed it out into a proper stub: there is lots more that can go into this article regarding computer security, malware, and different implementations of the x86 architecture. -- The Anome 11:38, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Talk

message: "With the introduction of SYSENTER/SYSEXIT and SYSCALL/SYSRET, a new faster mechanism was introduced for control transfers for x86 programs"
"Upon comparing call gates to interrupts, call gates are significantly faster."
2 methods... each is faster than the other.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.3.135.28 (talk) 14:03, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Software interrupts are a third method of system call, although that last sentence should be investigated. Abubalay (talk) 18:14, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modern Use 

message: The concept of a call gate is not unique to the Intel x86 architecture and did not originate there; it goes back at least as far as Multics. The article should either be renamed, e.g., to Call gate (Intel), or rewritten to comply with Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Username:Chatul (talk) 20:51, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Every generation believes that it invented sex 

message: The original Multics implementation of protection rings required that the Dynamic linker handle a segment fault for the first invocation of every routine. Call gates allowed eliminating that overhead. Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Username:Chatul (talk)
:How does it do so on Multics?  Or are you saying that this is a consequence of the x86 implementatino of call gates?
:The primary reason for call gates is to disallow code running in an outer ring from jumping to arbitrary code that would run in an inner ring; see "Gate Address Validation" on page 144 in section B "Access Control to the Multics Virtual Memory" in http://www.bitsavers.org/pdf/honeywell/large_systems/multics/haley/AG95_part2_Jun72.pdf. Guy Harris (talk) 21:42, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reasons for call gates
Talk:MV Hyundai Fortune

message: Isn't speculation over the causes of the explosion, including allegations of unscrupulous dangerous-goods handling, out of place in a Wikipedia article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.239.157.155 (talk • contribs) 12:12, July 21, 2006
:The calcium hypochlorite and fireworks theories seem valid. Indeed, the fireworks were the primary suspect during the follow-up investigation. However, I agree that the part about dangerous goods is a little out of line. I'll remove it. - Tronno ( t | c ) 20:24, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Causes?
Talk:Hard Promises

message: "To this day "WE LOVE YOU JL" is seen on every Hard Promises first issue US non-masterphile vinyl copy pressed." 
This sentence has three superfluous/misleading elements: 
1. "To this day..." The first issue is an event locked in time.  Whatever was true about the event in 1980 will be true for all time.  Close-out groove messages do not fade over time!   
2. "...seen on every..." All the copies of a given issue or pressing are identical, so of course an issue/pressing's close-out groove message will be seen on every copy of the issue/pressing.
3. "...non-masterphile..." This is redundant and irrelevant. MCA's Canadian "Masterphile" branded issue came out two years later, in 1981. (discogs.com/label/508260-Masterphile-Series)   
Upon further research, I'm not even sure the author's claim is true.  According to discogs.com, the first US pressing, from 1980 (discogs.com/Tom-Petty-And-The-Heartbreakers-Hard-Promises/release/7334907) does NOT have the "WE LOVE YOU J.L." deadwax etching; four US and one Canadian pressings, all from 1981, do. (E.g. discogs.com/Tom-Petty-And-The-Heartbreakers-Hard-Promises/release/412419)
In conclusion, it seems more reasonable for the article to read, ""WE LOVE YOU J.L."  is etched in Hard Promises' runout deadwax on early US and Canadian pressings."
Master Release page: discogs.com/Tom-Petty-And-The-Heartbreakers-Hard-Promises/master/74338?sort=year&sort_order=  Fp cassini (talk) 00:42, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  You know what would REALLY be nice (and anti-ironic, in a very Tom Petty way) - would be if you "INSIDERS" would stop posting jargon and maybe let some of the rest of us in on what the heck you're talking about.  Most people, myself included, don't have a frickin' CLUE what a "runout deadwax" is.  Sure, we can guess and figure out some things - but wouldn't it be easier for you "INSIDERS" to just clue us poor outsiders in a bit?  Share the love man.  Tom would not like the music elitist thing at all.  And by the way, I have a master copy of the original vinyl I play on a PL-1000 turntable about twice a year.  It doesn't have that inscription, and I bought this copy in 1981 (overseas in a US military exchange at RAF Mildenhall.  98.194.39.86 (talk) 14:42, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "WE LOVE YOU J.L."  is etched in Hard Promises' runout deadwax on early US and Canadian pressings.
Template talk:C. J. Cherryh

message: This template was created as per the discussion at Talk:C. J. Cherryh#Cherryh template?. --Bruce1ee 12:33, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cherryh template

message: I've tried to group the titles by series and then by publication sequence within each series. Can someone please check what I've done and amend if necessary. Also please check for any omissions. Thanks. --Bruce1ee 14:28, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Book title sequence 

message: Just for information, this template now loads closed, and requires that "show" be clicked to open it. The reason for this is that Template:Navigation, which this template uses, was changed to exhibit this behaviour, apparently due to "popular request". See Template talk:Navigation#Bug fix. --Bruce1ee 14:38, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template loads closed
Talk:Void (fanzine)

message: I hope someone will help expand this article.  My own copies of Void are buried in a box in storage, and I don't trust my memory, but I think many sf authors wrote for Void (Ted White? Harlan Ellison?  Robert Silverberg?).  If I can ever find my issues, I'll do more work on the article. Rick Norwood 12:35, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:S.W.A.G.

message: Saw this on the verify page, looked over the page, and saw that it is nothing more than a simple definition, and probably cannot go past a simple definition. I think this should be marked for deletion or moved to wiktionary. Any thoughts? - Sirwilliam 12:48, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.  But I thought the use of that template for that article is bloody ammusing.  Suggest listing on WP:AFD. -b 03:14, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Tarantulas (Transformers)

message: I placed the TransformerCon stuff after season 2 because it's taking place in season 2. There is presidence for that in most other articles, where we place character history in chronological order. Discuess? user:mathewignash
Nah, sounds fine to me.SMegatron 10:13, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Placement of convention fic

message: Hi, I'm the one who changed all the Tarantulas to Tarantulus because I recently downloaded all the Beast Wars series, and I found that Tarantulas is pronounced Tarantulus, with a "luss" ending instead of "lass." Check episode 18 of season 1, episode  2 of season 2, episode 11 of season 3 for the quickest checks^^. EmperorStarscream 06:43, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: --Tarantulas (talk) 18:14, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Tarantulus or Tarantulas?

message: Against - Tarantulas is a unique character with a long history best let to have his own page. Tarantulas appeared in multiple series, not just Beast Wars, so he's hardly going to be full rrepresented on a page devoted to just one series. Mathewignash (talk) 22:03, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: --Tarantulas (talk) 18:29, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?
Talk:Swan Hunter

message: The Information given about the future carrier contract is incorrect, as Swan Hunter has been given a £3bn contract to construct the two new carriers in partnership with BAE Systems Marine. http://www.bbc.co.uk/tees/360/swannindex.shtml
--Segafreak2 12:52, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: CVF Carrier Contract

message: Swan Hunters at Wallsend had four Dry Docks.
The dry dock used to repaired ships after their long distance voyage.
My father George Wilson was the Manager of the Dry docks.
His Nick name was the “Bull”
He started being at the Dry Dock in 1952.
From there he became Mechanical Foreman and ended up Dry Dock Manager in 1963
Passed away on 1969. 2001:8003:946A:7C00:DD1:C31:530A:CDE9 (talk) 08:50, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Swan Hunters Dry Dock Wallsend
Talk:Continuing patent application

message: I'm proposing to divide (apologies for the pun) Divisional patent application out of this article, as Continuing patent applications are more or less only a US concept, whereas Divisional applications have worldwide application (indeed, are required by Article 4G of the Paris Convention).  But not now, as I'm on lunch.  --Harris 12:59, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds good to me.--Nowa 13:48, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Divisional applications

message: I'm confused as to why one blog is a potentially unreliable source and another is not.  The referenced blog has links to the relevant pleadings in the Glaxo case, and it seems it makes more sense and is easier to read if you use a single link to a source of all the relevant pleadings rather than have multiple references.  Vikesfan33 14:07, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry for the confusion. I have added the tag for the other blog as well. I think it would be more appropriate to  have accurate references to the relevant pleadings or to peer-reviewed papers for instance (see WP:RS#Self-published sources). --Edcolins 16:10, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Potentially unreliable sources

message: Is the chart correct?  It seems that the positions of Divisional and Continuation should be reversed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.212.207.50 (talk) 09:35, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Summary of continuing patent applications in the US

message: Why is RCE practice discussed in this article?  This is a way of continuing the examination of an existing application.  It does not involve the filing of a new application that gets a new application number (unlike the old "file wrapper continuation" practice), and so it doesn't seem to relate to a "continuing application". --86.16.3.237 (talk) 11:26, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: RCE Practice
Talk:Lift hill

message: Section "Cable lift": "Because a cable is much lighter than a chain, cable lifts are much faster than chain lifts and can be used on much steeper hills - even vertical." - This sounds suspicious. Since the chain is a loop, the portion of the chain going downhill counterbalances the portion being raised uphill, and the weight of the chain being raised should be effectively close to zero. -- 201.37.229.117 (talk) 12:20, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weight of chain vs cable 

message: The external link says that the part that hooks onto the lift chain is called a "dog". If this is the correct terminology, shouldnt it be used in the wikipedia article?
76.212.149.88 (talk) 07:57, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terminology 

message: The weight of the chain alone is enough to keep it seated in its trough--magnets are not used. 75.25.95.60 (talk) 18:22, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Magnets don't hold the chain to the trough
Talk:Chris Smith, Baron Smith of Finsbury

message: It crosses my mind that MP Maureen Colquhoun effectively announced her lesbianism in 1976, and this fact is overlooked when Chris Smith is described as the first openly gay MP. --Dovea 13:06, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Mmm - it seems she took a paper to court over invasion of privacy, which is hardly open...  Evercat 20:50, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: He may have been the first to voluntarily come out, I think Maureen Colquhoun was effectively outed by the press, as in a sense was Jeremy Thorpe, but my memories are hazy. PatGallacher (talk) 14:18, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Coming out]]
Talk:Micro Change

message: Origin of the Transformers toyline, thus included in the WikiProject. --Geopgeop 13:07, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled