lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Theorema Egregium

message: I am Jimmy Snyder. I looked up the word egregium and found many English equivalent words such as remarkable, extraordinary, and distinguished among others. The wiki article uses remarkable. Is this just a random choice among the various possibilities or is there a particular reason for choosing this one over the others?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.61.117.8 (talk) 13:32, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question 

message: The page is missing many basic details, including the equation associated with the theorem or even a sketch of its proof. Therefore, I am adding a  tag. -V madhu (talk) 16:16, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: What do you mean by "the equation associated with the theorem"? Dfuz (talk) 12:24, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing details 

message: The Italian version of this article includes the latin wording "Si superficies curva in quamcumque aliam superficiem explicatur, mensura curvaturae in singulis punctis invariata manet" left out from this page that only quotes the English translation of the theorem. Should the translation not come in italics after the direct original latin quote, as is often the case for other languages such as German? 91.106.19.3 (talk) 14:59, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original wording
Talk:Hilbert's theorem (differential geometry)

message: Hilbert's theorem excludes only immersions that are at least of differentiability class C2.
This is in fact *false* for differentiability class C1 -- there exist, e.g., C1
isometric embeddings of the hyperbolic plane in R3 (see the theorem of Nash-Kuiper).
The statement of Hilbert's theorem, therefore, ought to mention that this theorem holds
only for differentiability class at least C2 -- and the proof ought to state
where this is relevant.Daqu (talk) 18:17, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing ingredient in statement and proof of theorem
Talk:Đàm Vĩnh Hưng

message: This page could use some serious clean-up, particularly the Singles section, which mainly contains things that quite frankly don't belong in the article—most of it should be reworded and split off into its own article(-s) about the song and the incident described. (Can anybody even figure out what that mess of a text is about? Looks like a product of Google Translate to me.)
Most of the rest of the article is written using poor grammar, and, as has already been pointed out, seriously lacks citations. It doesn't say much about DVH himself either. One particular part that needs expanding and additional citations is the Early life section. Was he really born in Da Nang? His website doesn't mention that. And if he was, when did he move to Saigon? Which is important because he is so strongly associated with the Saigon music scene. Did he really work as a hairdresser? That's actually interesting, and he probably did, but where is the reference? Where are all the references?
I would be happy to help with editing, but the actual content would have to be written/translated by somebody who speaks Vietnamese better than I do. Pfftallofthemaretaken (talk) 12:40, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article needs clean-up, references, and more content
Talk:Ronald S. Sullivan Jr.

message: Dear User:Eefun. I have asked you to correct factual errors in my additions to this article. I tried to follow the sources, but if you are more informed than me, corrections would be most welcome. I am also not aware of the grammatical errors you mention. My previous mistake of saying "these" for "criticism" instead of "criticisms" has been corrected. Again, feel free to reword things. Deleting a paragraph of content and replacing it with a non-neutral version without a more detailed reason should be avoided. Connor Behan (talk) 02:01, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: My edits mentioned Rakesh Khurana but not his precise role. Thanks for doing this. My sentence mentioning the HLS letter in the Globe might not be perfect but it makes the article more neutral than it was before. Your version gives the impression that opposition to Sullivan was universal and that there was no defence. For now, I have added back the Crimson link. If you can add reliable sources for the other petitions, that would be even better. I disagree with some of your policy interpretations (see WP:CRITS and WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS) but that is not my main concern right now. Connor Behan (talk) 02:42, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

text: I agree with the idea of changing the title. But the large amount of commentary on Harvard's decision should receive some weight in the section. Discussing one petition on each "side" like we're doing now seems fine as long as we don't go into great detail. Connor Behan (talk) 02:59, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Constructive edits
Talk:Damiano Damiani

message: The article is looking really good! The organization is great with the sources. There just needs to be more details about how he is significant because the assignment was to find someone literary. Why is he important? I understand he is a significant figure in the movie business but you should elaborate more how he contributes to the literary world. You can discuss his screenplays in more detail. Maybe there isn’t much about him but do the best you can. You got this! Val from socal (talk) 22:57, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Valerie Vera (peer review)
Talk:Damien Dempsey

message: This sentence say practically nothing:
:Dempsey flirted with controversy during his Oxegen 2006 performance. On the main stage on Saturday afternoon, the singer sensationally suggested that Patrick Pearse would be "turning in his grave" at the state of modern Ireland.
What was the topic of conversation at the time?  What did Dempsey see Pearse as advocating?  What aspect of modern Ireland would be violating Pearse's philosophy?  Without these details, it's just alleged gossip. Gronky (talk) 23:27, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably the attitude to the Irish language (which is bizarre in the Republic and paradoxical) and how the UK is recolonising the place.--MacRusgail (talk) 16:06, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Patrick Pearse's possible grave turning 

message: Is there any info out there concerning his personal life (relationships / marriage-etc)? Is he single? We are curious and cant find any info about this. Just curious. LoveLight8980 (talk) 07:53, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personal Life? 

message: I have uploaded a picture of DD w/ photographer permissions and made the necessary edits to page. Tehmasp (talk) 02:05, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Damien Dempsey Picture 

message: Whomever has listed Dempsey's height as over 9'2" and his brothers at 10'5" is not converting from meters correctly. Two meters = 6' 6.74". I can't access the article linked in the footnote so dont have the original figures for converting. Somebody out there please correct the info! 2601:14F:0:CB:25D9:924A:C2BD:426C (talk) 18:55, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Damien Dempsey height
Talk:Maeda Matsu

message: So.. the corresponding Japanese Wiki lists her as . For her name, it seems they only wrote , which seems to indicate that she went by Hoshun'in and wanted to be remembered as such. Based on that, I'm thinking we should move this page to Hoshun-in or something. Thoughts? — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 03:47, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Hōshun'in would be her posthumous Buddhist name, or kaimyo in Japanese. It was the name she was given after death, and so it becomes a term of respect. However, her name in life, and in history, would be Maeda Matsu. Boneyard90 (talk) 06:12, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kanji
Talk:Dan Carey (record producer)

message: Regarding a possible conflict of interest in the promotion of this person's biography, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard#Erik Eger Entertainment and THREEE editing on behalf of clients. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 03:55, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible conflict of interest 
Talk:Newstead, Scottish Borders

message: Some anonymous guy really fucked this article up. Any changes by administrators? --Chinese3126 (talk) 03:18, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: (User talk:s0456769)why do you think it has been fucked up  —Preceding comment was added at 03:38, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Please explain further - I restored an image & the lead that was lost a while ago, but changes by anon today appear to have improved the article with an infobox and relevant material. I agree that the references could do with a tidy but apart from that it looks in not too bad a shape. Keith D (talk) 10:34, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Dandy Livingstone

message: What was the Giant label then?
Why no mention? I have a few Giant singles and would liek to know more...
Szczels (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 15:04, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Giant label? 
Talk:Daniel Barbu

message: Just wanted to say: all the info published on the page are documented in Daniel Barbu's profiles on  the University of Bucharest site and Political Science Department site. Kamasarye (talk) 18:23, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sudhir Kakar

message: Mira and the Mahatma: is this fiction? who said so? the author?
:Austerlitz -- 88.75.88.171 (talk) 15:16, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Austerlitz -- 88.75.88.171 (talk) 15:17, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

text: Austerlitz -- 88.75.196.4 (talk) 10:26, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fiction?
Talk:Susie Orbach

message: Given that "the Continental Congress adopted the current design for the Great Seal of the United States including a Bald Eagle grasping thirteen arrows and a thirteen-leaf olive branch with its talons on June 20, 1782." (Wikipedia entry for Bald Eagle) I am very suspicious of the claim that Susie Orbach helped chose the national bird of the United States as the bald eagle, in 1976. Perhaps she helped chose a specific bald eagle for use in some ceremony marking the bicentennial of the founding of the US. Clarification and citation are required. [Actinman]  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Actinman (talk • contribs) 17:45, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Added in this edit. Probably just vandalism. Paul B (talk) 17:33, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm sure you can be a social critic without a college degree, I don't think you can become a psychotherapist without at least a college degree. At least in the United States you need a degree to get licensed. To be a psychologist you need at least a masters or a Psy D in addition to a 4 year college degree. To be a psychiatrist, who can prescribe medicine, you must first finish medical school and then complete additional training in the specialty. The only information about Ms. Orbach has her going to school until age 15. Ileanadu (talk) 01:52, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Education?
Talk:Daniel Edward Pilarczyk

message: Citation for the information regarding criminal conviction is noted under external links (BNET article: http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1141/is_7_40/ai_111616641)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.67.250.122 (talk) 21:15, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Citation

message: I have removed material from  that does not comply with our policy on the biographies of living persons. Biographical material must always be referenced from reliable sources, especially negative material. Negative material that does not comply with that must be immediately removed. Note that the removal does not imply that the information is either true or false.
Please do not reinsert this material unless you can provide reliable citations, and can ensure it is written in a neutral tone. Please review the relevant policies before editing in this regard. Editors should note that failure to follow this policy may result in the removal of editing privileges.--Scott Mac (Doc) 23:53, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  removed 
Talk:Svante Cornell

message: Just want to point out that it was all discussed before, and I don't know why Meowy didn't place it into the article, I thought he had done so already: 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_39#Is_Russia_Today_a_valid_source
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_39#Is_The_Nation_a_reliable_source.3F HistoricWarrior007 (talk) 08:59, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Ahh, Meowy was/is blocked, for some reason, ergo he couldn't make those edits. Well that explains it. HistoricWarrior007 (talk) 09:56, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional Links 

message: # - this is WP:OR, I could not find and source stating that Cornell receive funding from Azerbaijan and information about ISDP is WP:UNDUE. It  should be in the related article, not in the lead of this article.
# - WP:OR/WP:SYNTH. This statement is original research of some editor and Wikipedia is not a place for someones original research. No source for inline citation of that statement.
# - It is not a criticism and cherry-picking from the article does not make it criticism either. Moreover, his analysis were correct, weren't they? 
Above I BLP issues I noted at first look, but seemingly article has more hidden BLP issues. I will check it more deeply sooner. Abrvagl (talk) 20:15, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  BLP Issues.
Talk:Dan Jacobs (trumpeter)

message: This article needs to be re-written so that it either avoids verbiage such as "internationally acclaimed", "world-class" etc., or backs up these assertions with attribution. I also think that "His CD's are available online at..." isn't appropriate here.  -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 01:03, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Daniel Kottke

message: On 16 August 2016, the user at 79.138.131.118 added incorrect information about Daniel Kottke's vital statistics.  The reference had no link but included the following:  "Daniel was shot dead on August 7, 2016 together with 8 others who were critically injured on the Miami High School. He was announced dead on August 15th."  The user probably referred to a different Daniel Kottke, and my condolences to his loved ones.   Nevertheless, the information was removed as the Daniel Kottke to which this page refers is alive.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kku salerno (talk • contribs) 17:46, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccurate Information on Daniel Kottke's Vital Statistics 
Talk:Tim Congdon

message: I have (I believe) corrected this article's reference to Tim Congdon's Financial Times (FT) comment on the UK Government's intervention in Northern Rock.  It previously stated that Congdon had argued that the intervention was making money for the government.  But if you read his piece carefully, I think you will see that he was in fact saying that it had a decent chance of making money for the Government in the future. It is true that the headline to the article says "is making", but my experience has been that newspaper editors feel free to place whatever headline they choose on an author's article, implying that the FT should be held responsible for the (misleading) headline, not Congdon.  Nandt1 (talk) 12:46, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Congdon's comment on Northern Rock
Talk:Todd Compton

message: Eg 
*the trib's Rolly:  "I wrote in Wednesday’s column about the LDS Church-owned [Hodgdon: ie editorially sectarian] Deseret News’ refusal to run a Signature Books ad promoting two of its books on polygamy, "In Sacred Loneliness" by Todd Compton and "Mormon Polygamy" by the late Richard Van Wagoner. Signature’s marketing director, Tom Kimball, was told that polygamy was just too hot of a topic.</p>"That’s funny."The Huffington Post ran a story Nov. 26 by Carol Kuruvilla about the history of polygamy in the Mormon church."Kuruvilla wrote that church officials could not provide her with a comprehensive list of LDS Church founder Joseph Smith’s wives, but the church’s public affairs department directed her to Todd Compton (yes, that Todd Compton) author of "In Sacred Loneliness," the book the Deseret News thought was too controversial to advertise."link
*"...The church’s public affairs department directed HuffPost to Todd Compton, a Mormon researcher whose 1997 book In Sacred Loneliness compiles a list of 33 well-documented wives of Joseph Smith...." HuffPo
*etc--Hodgdon's secret garden (talk) 23:20, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: None of this directly supports the statement that he is "generally considered the premiere living expert on the plural wives of ... Joseph Smith"; the only way they could, would be via wp:SYNTH or wp:OR interpretation. —Asterisk*Splat→ 20:49, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  Have now rephrased lede to say subject's "an" expert on Joseph Smith Jr.'s plural wives. Thanks, Random.--Hodgdon's secret garden (talk) 21:25, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Status @ lede as current go-to expert on JS wives
Talk:Daniel Mastretta

message: I've declined the speedy on this one, because multiple sources were readily apparent from a brief google search. I added two of these; with the claim of notability (designed the first Mexican sports car), the article no longer appears to meet the criteria for Speedy deletion. It's a stub, no question, and it sat for what looks like 2 1/2 years without much attention. But it (barely) meets our criteria for inclusion. Further debate on the issue should probably go to AFD, if you like. Thanks! UltraExactZZ  Claims ~ Evidence  14:09, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy Deletion

message: OK, I'm officially nominating this for deletition. This stub has been abandoned for 2 and a half years without any sources (the latest change was from UltraExactZZ who added sorces so that it wouldn't be speed deleted)... How is this person important? A person that designed a prototype car. The issue was covered on a couple of specialized online car magazines back then.  The supossed car hasn't even reched production.  From what I understand of the notability guidelines, this is in no way notable. Just because there are a couple of online magazine articles mentioning this person's name it doesn't mean we should have an article for him. I mean if you type any person's name these days on google you're likely to get results... Cerealito (talk) 20:08, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Daniel Moskos

message: This page is nothing more than a scouting report, and it's highly-opinionated.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.18.22.167 (talk) 19:32, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I was surprised by the same impression. As is, I'm not sure the article would survive an AfD. -Phoenixrod (talk) 17:07, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a biography
Talk:Vārttikakāra

message: "The word vārttik- derives from vṛtti," Almost. Vṛtti ('rolling; conduct; mode of being; etc') is an action noun that derives from the verbal root √vṛt 'to turn, to be'. In grammar a vṛtti is something that needs analysing such as a taddhita or other compound, or any word formed by adding an affix. Vārttika is a taddhita compound which adds the suffix -ka and causes vṛddhi of the root vowel, so vṛṭti > vārtti > vārtti-ka meaning 'skilled in a profession or business; explanatory, glossing etc'. According to Monier-Williams, in a grammatical context the word means "an explanatory or supplementary rule, critical gloss or annotation." The second member of the compound vārttika-kāra is from the verb root √kṛ 'to do, to make' and kāra ('a maker, a doer') is an agent noun and once again a taddhita with the suffix -a and kṛ > kār (vṛddhi). So a vārttika-kāra is one who makes a critical gloss, or just a "commentator" in the traditional Sanskrit sense. Jayarava (talk) 09:18, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Derrivation
Talk:Sentimientos de la Nación

message: In the Spanish version  the text includes the following passage:
la soberania...   ...reside en la persona del señor don Fernando VII y su ejercicio...
I do not see this text in the English version.  Would someone please look up the primary sources, if they have them available, because the addition of the royal person gives a completely different (monarchist) orientation of the "Sentiments of the Nation" and  therefore, must be reflected appropriately.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by --Aceofhearts1968 (talk) 22:50, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: article 5

message: According to Wikipedia:
5. Sovereignty emanates from the people and is placed in a Supreme National American Congress, made up of representatives from the provinces in equal numbers.
6. Division of powers into appropriate executive, legislative, and judicial branches.
But according to 
José Maria Morelos, “Sentiments of the Nation” (1813), 189-191.
From The Mexico Reader: History, Culture, Politics, ed. Gilbert M. Joseph and Timothy J. Henderson (Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 2002).
5. That sovereignty springs directly from the People, who wish only to de­
posit it in their representatives, whose powers shall be divided into Legislative,
Executive, and Judiciary branches, with each Province electing its representative. These representatives will elect all others, who must be wise and virtuous
people....
6. [Article 6 is missing from all reproductions of this document. Ed.]
It seems to me that Wikipedia took article 5 and split it to fill the empty article six while conserving the number of articles. If that is the case, then this issue may need corrected. I have access to a source if needed.--134.10.79.217 (talk) 04:18, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Articles 5, 6
Talk:Adelaide Johnson

message: This photo is about the same woman ? . --Susanna Giaccai (talk) 08:46, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  another photo 
Talk:413 Hope St.

message: A request for comments has been started that could affect the inclusion 
or exclusion of episodes and characters, as well as other fiction articles. Please 
visit the discussion at 
Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(fiction)#Final_adoption_as_a_guideline. Ikip (talk) 11:16, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for comment on articles for individual television episodes and characters
Talk:Plan of Iguala

message: The treaty was based on this plan but they are not the same document.  This document was written by Iturbide before the conclusion of the war as a proposal if they should win.  More of a propaganda device.Thelmadatter (talk) 17:21, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Danielle Scott-Arruda

message: Shouldn't this article be moved to Danielle Scott-Arruda since that's the same on her USA profile, as well as on her profile for the FIVB ? Pithou (talk) 16:30, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Move?

message: Danielle has been hurt by your brother in law, and your sister Stefanie has died.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.145.74.173 (talk) 17:04, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Hurt
Talk:Daniil Ivanov

message: European Club Champions' Cup: 
2007 -  Miskolc - 3rd place (3 points) 
2008 -  Slaný - European Champion (2 points) 
2009 - 4rd place in the Semi-Final 
--Diwas (talk) 15:53, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  4rd? 3rd or 4th? 
Talk:Danilo Bertazzi

message: This article was nominated for speedy deletion as a non-notable person. I removed the nomination because being an actor on Italian television is a claim to notability. I also note that he has an article on the Italian Wikipedia. Italian Wikipedia article. This should go to AfD if the nominator still wishes to delete it. Capitalistroadster (talk) 19:57, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy deletion nomination