lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:Wiki Markup Language

message: You'll go through agonizing several iterations of <nowiki> and non-breaking spaces until you finally realize that what you're looking for is the  tag (view the source):
<xmldoc>
	<node>this is a test</node>
</xmldoc>
When you hit the tab key, you'll tab to the next field, which is usually the copyright link. To get around this, open up a text editor, put a tab there and copy it. Paste it multiple times if necessary, and you'll create beautifully formatted XML!Chrisbbehrens 23:06, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: A Primer on Displaying XML in Wikipedia

message: How about keeping just some of the Wiki specific information in such a format (BTW, the name should be changed to ensure that no confusion is created with WML, the Wireless Markup Language):
<wikiarticle>: The header for a wiki article
         <history>: start of the history section, that basically mirrors the history page in a wiki.It would include multiple revision tags:       
                  <revision>: start of a specific revision information
                  
                  <version> a version id (similar to the oldid variable in the URL) </version>
                  <date>Time Date Stamp</date>
                  <user>Which user made the revision</user>
                  <type>Bot Edit? Minor Edit? Section Edit? </type>
                  <description>The description of the change (edit summary)</description>
            </revision>
         </history> 
</wikiarticle>
This would allow to tackle the whole history specific part of wikis. We can then fall back on things like the Dublin Core or RSS (or ATOM) for the rest of the formatting? What do you think?
--TNL 22:36, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Focus on History? 

message: I think some of us need to focus on getting media wiki to support WML or whatever it will be called if we want it to be widly adopted.
Yeah, probably a good idea to line up some PHP talent to work on that project once we're a little further along with this stuff.Chrisbbehrens 03:27, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Media Wiki Support 

message: Nick Irelan seems intent on getting credit for having started the group, igniting several version battles. I don't care if he gets it or not; unless there's an official Wikipedia policy prohibiting this, I say leave it there.Chrisbbehrens 22:50, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Credit for Nick Irelan 

message: I've proposed a date format on the main page. React and discuss.Chrisbbehrens 23:13, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date Format 

message: My understanding is that articles will be written in the same markup they use now, but the Wiki software will convert them into WKML for syndication, etc. Is that correct, or is WKML inteded to be a replacement for the current wiki markup?  Noldoaran 22:33, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the purpose and implementation of WKML? 

message: There's HTML in the content? Is this a proposal to not have styled text in WKML? I might be misunderstanding renotate, which is not a word I've seen before. Brock 07:12, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scrubbing HTML?
Talk:The Truth About Nanjing

message: This existence of this film project is well-sourced, and it is notable.--Daveswagon 05:51, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: speedy deletion tag will be removed. future film tag will replace it. thanks.--Tainter 06:02, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reason to keep

message: I added links to this article on a couple relevant topics (the massacre itself, Sino-Japanese relations), but more could be helpful. Although, considering the surprising number of inter-Wiki links that exist, can this article still be considered an orphan? I'm tempted to say no, but I'll leave the tags on just in case. --Do Not Talk About Feitclub (contributions) 08:22, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphan Status? 

message: The phrase “backed by overwhelming material evidence” is not neutral, since these “evidence” were proved to be fake….  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.78.115.124 (talk) 06:28, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evidences? 

message: This article should be rewritten in the past tense. JoshuSasori (talk) 04:27, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Future tense
Talk:Blocking (statistics)

message: The example of shoes designed to last longer, with random assignment and blocking using left and right shoes is not a better design.  If the two assignments interact with each other, then both the blocking and the overall experiment fail to achieve their purpose.  Suppose having one worn out shoe and one shoe that has little if any wear were to cause discomfort, strain, injury, or aesthetic displeasure. Factors such as these might cause a person to walk less, thereby confounding the experiment. Experiments don't always need "more" blocking, or blocking at lower units of analysis - they need the right level of blocking. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bbbozzz (talk • contribs) 05:55, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disagree with example in article 

message: What does he mean by completely randomized design?  The assignment to one group or the other wasn't done randomly, it was done evenly between the two groups... (Also, is there such a thing as completely randomized designs?)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.254.194.238 (talk) 18:53, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure what she (the Wikipedia page) means. It does seem as though there is something that is called completely randomized design. Klbrain (talk) 08:39, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Completely randomized design? 

message: — Preceding unsigned comment added by Specimen3a (talk • contribs) 02:37, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page describes stratification, not blocking! 

message: After the first paragraph the main intro-text seems to focus mainly on the 'blocks method' and its relevance wrt solving limit theorems, which it supports using in-text references for some strange reason (also why capitalize Probability Theory). I can only think that this is an unfortunate result of merging Randomized Block Design and Blocking or something. 
As you read on there seem to be more sections than subjects. As an example: do we really need 2 separate headings for nuisance factors and blocking?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.90.41.64 (talk) 15:55, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Main text off-topic and too many sections in Randomized Block Design 

message: The opening paragraph states:  In the  statistical theory of the design of experiments, blocking is the arranging of experimental units in groups (blocks) that are similar to one another.
This says that the groups are similar to one another, which is not so.
I believe the statement should instead read something like this:  In the  statistical theory of the design of experiments, blocking is the arranging of experimental units that are similar to one another in groups (blocks).
I will make this change. Johsebb (talk) 18:29, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in the opening paragraph?
Talk:FAST protocol

message: Other than Spryware, is anyone aware of any commercially available products that support FAST? Ronnotel 05:56, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commercial vendors 

message: Realtime Data has obtained patents that it says apply to FAST.  They are suing CME in the Eastern District of Texas, which is notoriously friendly to patent trolls.  Exchanges are now looking to migrate away from FAST.  This should probably be in the article.  --ChrisRuvolo (t) 04:14, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Patents 
Talk:2004 Mississippi Amendment 1

message: A move discussion dated 30 December 2012 affecting this page took place at at Talk:Arkansas_Constitutional_Amendment_3#Move?. The result of the move request was: 'pages moved. Apparently uncontroversial.' --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:53, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Page move
Talk:Confederate War Memorial (Dallas)

message: I have noticed recent edits to this article that seem to be in reaction to recent news coverage, instead of factual, unbiased information. I would request that editors try to keep a neutral point of view when they make edits to this article. Multiple viewpoints are acceptable, but bias is not. —Josh3580talk/hist 00:44, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: User:Josh3580: Could you please be more specific?Zigzig20s (talk) 15:09, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

text: I removed the tags. The article is purely descriptive.Zigzig20s (talk) 15:26, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV issues 

message: The article states that the memorial was dedicated June 26, 1896. That is when the cornerstone was laid. It was dedicated April 29, 1897.
"Veil Has Been Drawn," Dallas Morning News, April 30, 1897: 1, accessed August 16, 2017, http://infoweb.newsbank.com/resources/doc/nb/image/v2:0F99DDB671832188@EANX-NB-10728979A3F51FB8@2414045-10728979B6562FD0@0-1072897AAD547E00@Veil Has Been Drawn?p=AMNEWS.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samchilders (talk • contribs) 19:54, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dedication Date 

message: Sources conflict regarding the height of the monument. Recent Dallas Morning News stories state that it is 65 ft, while older sources (including the Morning News) say 60 ft, although this is usually phrased like "a 60 ft pillar/obelisk topped with a marble statue of a Confederate soldier." I surmise that the obelisk is 60 ft high and the soldier is 5 ft high, yielding an overall height of 65 ft, but I can't find a published source to confirm this theory. Does anyone have a source that clarifies the matter? Carguychris (talk) 14:12, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Monument height conflict
Category talk:Methodist missionary bishops

message: This category was rename to "Methodist Missionary Bishops" from previous name "Missionary Bishops of the United Methodist Church" per a request and close which can be found at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2007 January 7. For whatever it's worth below is the outline of the page history under the old name. Herostratus 05:59, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: New name
Talk:Grammar induction

message: This isn't my area, but I know enough about it to know that it's inaccurate to say that genetic/evolutionary algorithms are the canonical methods of grammar induction.  They're used, but so are dozens of other approaches. --Delirium 05:59, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually a significant amount of work in grammar inference is done on grammars less expressive than CFG. See the proceedings of International Colloquium on Grammatical Inference of recent years. Also for CFG learning, there are quite a few algorithms not mentioned in this article. Took (talk) 20:18, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

text: I renamed your site to Straight-line grammar. There is substantial difference between grammatical inference algorithms and straight-line grammar: the first one aims at learning a grammar, the second one just want to structure one sequence. I really think they should not be merged Mgalle (talk) 16:09, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:South Carolina Amendment 1

message: This article is the most blatant example of the NPOV (Neutral Point of View) principle of Wikipedia I have ever seen.  This entire article needs to be rewritten to remove all opinion and provide a more objective viewpoint.  By the way, this comes from someone who 100% supports gay rights (including marriage equality) and happened to be South Carolina at the time it was passed.  If nobody is willing to do it (preferably someone from SC), then I will do it myself; I just can't do it tonight.Bjeversole 05:15, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blatant POV 

message: A move discussion dated 30 December 2012 affecting this page took place at at Talk:Arkansas_Constitutional_Amendment_3#Move?. The result of the move request was: 'pages moved. Apparently uncontroversial.' --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:53, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Page move
Talk:2005 Texas Proposition 2

message: From a World Net Daily story http://www.wnd.com/2005/10/33050/ here:
:"Save Texas Marriage also claims the amendment will take away benefits and hospital visitation and other benefits for unmarried couples. But Shackelford says the amendment clearly states: "This state recognizes that through the designation of guardians, the appointment of agents and the use of private contracts, persons may adequately and properly appoint guardians and arrange rights relating to hospital visitation, property and the entitlement to proceeds of life insurance policies without the existence of any legal status identical or similar to marriage.'"
This language doesn't seem to be "in the amendment". 
There's a similar reference in Brown, et al., Lyle C. (2011-2012 edition). Practicing Texas Politics. p. 66:
:"Nevertheless, the proposed amendment contained language allowing the appointment of guardians, rights to property, hospital visitation, and the designation of life insurance beneficiaries without the necessity of legal marriage."
Was there more to the amendment that the 2 clauses this entry now covers? Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 00:12, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Answer. The legislation proposing the text to be put to the voters included a section with these guarantees as a statement of state policy only. Found here Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 00:18, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Anything more to this amendment?
Talk:Infinitely Variable Transmission

message: The IVT is a specific type of CVT that has an infinite range of input/output ratios in addition to its infinite number of possible ratios; this qualification for the IVT implies that its range of ratios includes a zero output/input ratio that can be continuously approached from a defined 'higher' ratio. A zero output implies an infinite input, which can be continuously approached from a given finite input value with an IVT. [Note: remember that so-called 'low' gears are a reference to low ratios of output/input, which have high input/output ratios that are taken to the extreme with IVT's, resulting in a 'neutral', or non-driving 'low' gear limit.]
Most (if not all) IVT's result from the combination of a CVT with an epicyclic gear system (which is also known as a planetary gear system) that facilitates the subtraction of one speed from another speed within the set of input and planetary gear rotations. This subtraction only needs to result in an continuous range of values that includes a zero output; the maximum output/input ratio can be arbitrarily chosen from infinite practical possibilities through selection of extraneous input or output gear, pulley or sprocket sizes without affecting the zero output or the continuity of the whole system. Importantly, the IVT is distinguished as being 'infinite' in its ratio of high gear to low gear within its range; high gear is infinite times higher than low gear. The IVT is always engaged, even during its zero output adjustment.
The term 'Infinitely Variable Transmission' does not imply reverse direction, disengagement, automatic operation, or any other quality except ratio selectabilty within a continuous range of input/output ratios from a defined minimum to an undefined, 'infinite' maximum. This means continuous range from a defined output/input to zero output/input ratio.71.198.223.13 06:01, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

message: The page about continuously variable transmission (CVT) contains similar information about IVT.  It seems that this separate page should be merged into the CVT page, or else the IVT stuff pulled out of the CVT page.
152.17.54.23 02:00, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge into CVT page?
Talk:Stuart N. Lake

message: Labeling Stuart Lakes biography of Wyatt Earp as "highly fictionalized" exhibits a bias against Wyatt Earp.  Mr Lake used direct eyewitness testimony, original court transcripts, and information provided by Wyatt Earp, who dedicated two years of his life in order to tell his side of those events that make up part of our history.  Rjgoyette (talk) 18:29, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why "Highly Fictionalized"?
Template talk:Current sport-related

message: I created this template as a version of Template:Current-related for current and related sporting events, using elements from Template:Dab current as well. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 06:02, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

message: Template: has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — KnightLago (talk) 23:03, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  TfD nomination of [[:Template:{{ucfirst:Current sport-related}}]] 

message: The icons here fail Wikipedia:ICONDECORATION and Wikipedia:ICONDECORATION#Do_not_illustrate_or_introduce_unpublished_ideas and as such should be removed Gnevin (talk) 22:55, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I think there is a difference between icons that are part of the Wikipedia user interface, and those used in encyclopedia content.  I think the manual of style ought to only apply to the latter, which does not include this template. — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 00:10, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Awe so on the main space but not part of it . That's fair .Gnevin (talk) 00:25, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I think it should be treated like the icons in  et. al., which are obviously very widely used. — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 00:57, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, my understanding is that MOS:ICON does not apply to this and other article message boxes. Zzyzx11 (talk) 02:49, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: This template fails MOSICON
Talk:Ace of Cakes

message: The text here plagarizes th actual company site. as such, I am removing the section entirely. ThuranX 18:59, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Charm City Cakes 

message: The statement that the June 4, 2008 episode outdrew Game 6 of the Stanley Cup Finals is based on a humorous comment by a columnist in a Canadian newspaper lamenting the lack of popularity of the NHL in the United States and is not meant to be taken as fact.  The only show that outdrew Game 6 that day was So You Think You Can Dance on the FOX Network.  Although it is a very popular show on the Food Network, this episode didn't even make it to the top 10 for cable shows for the week.  TVWeek.com Ratings, Week of June 2, 2008
Max Density (talk) 22:32, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception 

message: If the ratings are good, why is the show being cancelled?  Mr JM  03:43, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Because of Mary-Alice's new haircut. --95.88.156.189 (talk) 10:31, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reason for Cancellation 

message: I've removed bulleted section of links from the references section.  There is no indication that these links have anything to do with the article.  They just appear to be the result of an editor's Googling.  If any of these are references to actual content in the article, please cite them instead.--RadioFan (talk) 02:32, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  reference link farm 

message: Given the location of the company, someone really should find out of the building survives it. --63.3.2.1 (talk) 03:55, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hurricane Irene 
Talk:Narentines/Archive 3

message: This page includes some modern Serbian myths, like the idea that Nerentines were Serbs. I didn't see any independent links that could prove that. An article of "archeologist" Marko Aleksić completely unknown to Google scholar is not what I call reliable source. 
I suggerst changing "Serbs" to "Slavs" until valid (non-ex-Yugoslavia, if possible) sources are provided. --83.131.195.107 06:32, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is provided, a contemporary Byzantine chronicle from the 10th century. --PaxEquilibrium 12:53, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced 

message: In theory these would be the pagans people would typically be talking about when discussing something like [Gehenna] yah?  Mathiastck 11:21, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs more wiki 

message: i think that roman imperator konstantin porfirogenit called them serbs.
maybe they wasn't serbs - but i don't now why somebody call nerentian land croatian.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.46.246.190 (talk) 15:53, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  they was serbs
Talk:Tefilat HaDerech

message: Is there a better recording of the prayer? The youtube video sound quality was very poor. Is there a sound file that anyone can recommend? Thanks.--Redblossom 23:10, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Redblossom had put this on the main page, I am just moving it here Epson291 06:38, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

text: User:Eliyak fixed the formatting up to something more standard and easier to read, it's the same transliteration. Epson291 09:07, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

message: The nikudot don't display properly in wikipedia they should be removed.  Why can't wikipedia use the proper rendering protocol to display them properly? --Saxophonemn (talk) 14:05, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nikudot 

message: Does anyone have any information about the origins of this prayer, who wrote it, or which text it first appeared in?
Drfryer (talk) 14:38, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  History?
Talk:Bangladesh Railway

message: I have moved the comment from the Alco image to here so it can be discussed.
"citation needed|reason=Alco became defunct in 1969; this one looks pretty new. As far as I have seen, the newer broad gauge locomotives have manufacturer's plate that reads "Diesel Locomotive Works, Varanasi, India" and the relatively older metre gauge locomotives (those imported in 70's and 80's) were manufactured by Bombardier Inc. (Canada). The oldest broad gauge locomotives, those before 1969, are perhaps by Alco.|date=May 2016 diesel locomotive near Jessore, Bangladesh"
Myrtlegroggins (talk) 10:31, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: locomotive image

message: What is the purpose of so many images of similar stuff? Is this supposed to be a comprehensive picture book of Bangladesh Railway? Aditya(talk • contribs) 18:16, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Way too many unncessary images 

message: Missing word replaces [...] gauge.     ----MountVic127 (talk) 08:41, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  ... gauge 
Talk:Bangladesh Telegraph and Telephone Board

message: Hi, I am working on this article to provide the accurate information including the current status of Organization. If it is already become BTCL, then we might need to migrate two article. Other then that BTRC is another independent organization which is working as regulatory board. If I am not wrong, it is not possible to be a provider and regulator of same industry. I am digging data for it. If anyone can please help. Thanks Bauani (talk) 16:02, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Since BTTB and BTCL are the same organization which underwent a name change, I am merging the two articles together. BTRC is a separate commission though, so that should remain as a separate article. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 01:23, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: BTTB, BTRC, BTCL