Talk:Third-country economic relationships with the European Union

message: on the last line about Switzerland/Schengen after the point there is a word "See", but nothing more ...
: Yeah, sorry. Hold on a sec, and I'll find that link I meant to add there. Aris Katsaris 23:44, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  EEA and EFTA typo 

message: what about these - replacement for ENP... Alinor 08:03, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  EU-Russia four common spaces 

message: * I added a brief note about the candidate states, but maybe it should be explained more broadly that the EU deals with candidates trough the Enlargmenet policy (very close relationship, participating in various programes, meetings, etc.) and with other states trough the External Relations policies. Another question is if we should follow this distinction here (It makes sense, but should be mentioned - otherwise "Third Country relationships" are missing states, that will join the EU soon. Odd.).
* Also, what about EU-US relations. Are they unimportant, unexistent, or what? :) Maybe to be delat on another page, but at least there should be a link.
* Other "traditional" states too. This page seems too focused on "near abroad" (EFTA, Mediterranean, USSR).
Alinor 07:34, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: See Third country relationships with the European Union for links to such articles. Alinor 10:01, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  more important third countries 

message: I think that we should not refer to Serbia-Montenegro and Andorra in this section. Their euro use is UNILATERAL, so this is a NOT EU RELATIONSHIP. Of course a link to Euro or Eurozone can be included with the note "some other countries unilateraly decided to use the Euro without a formal agreement with the EU" (also on the Euro/Eurozone the issue of the ongoing Andorra Euro-negotiations is elaborated). Besides EU-SiM relations are delat with on the Enlargement of the European Union page (as SiM is an official potential candidate, etc.) Agree? Alinor 21:18, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eurozone and Eurozone-related 

message: The statement that Monaco, San Marino and Vatican City are not 'official' members of the Eurozone is somewhat misleading. They are in fact official members of the Eurozone, but have different agreements which allow them to produce their own euro coins in limited quantities, as stated in the article. I propose removing this section from this article and placing it on its own page, which would further elaborate on this special relationship. This is because in the next 5 years, Andorra, Montenegro and Kosovo will have similar agreements and Monaco will join the EU.  Thoughts? -Theeuro (talk) 02:19, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eurozone-related 

message: Seriously -- this is supposed to be implemented into a larger important body of work and it only has TWO references to substantiate what it's saying?! It references a speech by a commissioner but doesn't provide a reference to it. Theoretically I could be within my rights to delete nearly all this article because there are no citations.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.98.39.95 (talk) 10:33, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why are there nearly zero references for this article?