Talk:Tim Murphy (American politician)

message: While interesting, I'm not sure the information about his traffic accident belongs in the Tenure section--certainly not with the level of detail that is presented there. Consider moving it to an "Other facts" section and shortening the reference to it in the Tenure section to 0 or 1 short sentences.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alvint69 (talk • contribs) 16:36, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content of "Tenure" section 

message: Anyone else think that "won big" is both poor grammatically and a potential POV issue?
:I agree, and I'm changing it.
Vic Troy 22:22, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wording question 

message: I really think a political views area needs to be added
(24.54.140.217 00:06, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Political views 

message: It looks like someone from Wake Forest University keeps deleting the "ethics flap" content. I guess blocking the IP @s from the House of Representatives isn't good enough to protect us anymore.
02:07, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletions 

message: I think everyone should refrain from using this as a political platform to take potshots at either an incumbant or a candidate.  Without any opposing or balanced viewpoint this is simply a blog and not a source for valid biographical information.  If you feel a need to attack an individual, please use a blog or a different platform, not Wikipedia.  18:17, 21 December 2006 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.29.103.225 (talk • contribs) 
:You appear to totally misunderstand what Wikipedia is about, and what is appropriate for articles about people.  In your last set of edits, you removed THREE sources as well as deleting or minimizing negative information about Johnson.  Negative information not only is perfectly appropriated (if correctly sourced, as was the case here) for articles on people, per WP:BLP, it's important if the article is going to be informative and useful. 
:If you know of any Wikipedia policies that support your assertions about what people should "refrain" from doing, please cite them here.  Otherwise, please stop deleting information from the article.  John Broughton  |  Talk 16:41, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potshots 

message: The entire political stances section reads like something out of a press release. Could someone take out a lot of the opinionated adjectives and adverbs? It's not Wikipedia's place to decide whether he's "naturally" been a leader on health care reform, and if he has, could someone please put some evidence? Furthermore, this is the only page that takes a long shot at CREW, even though there are plenty of Congressmen who have it mentioned on their page. Just mentioning briefly that the organization is left-leaning will do, and we shouldn't assume that the corruption charges were politically motivated in the heading.
Clevomon  |  Talk 14:04, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Timothy F. Murphy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071002163348/http://www.beyonddelay.org:80/node/373 to http://www.beyonddelay.org/node/373
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:49, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Timothy F. Murphy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.politicspa.com/FEATURES/SmartestLegislators.htm
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.beyonddelay.org/node/373
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160918210341/http://www.electionreturns.state.pa.us/ENR_New/General/OfficeResults?OfficeID=11&ElectionID=27&ElectionType=G&IsActive=0 to http://www.electionreturns.state.pa.us/ENR_New/General/OfficeResults?OfficeID=11&ElectionID=27&ElectionType=G&IsActive=0
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160620194150/http://www.electionreturns.state.pa.us/ENR_New/General/OfficeResults?OfficeID=11&ElectionID=41&ElectionType=G&IsActive=0 to http://www.electionreturns.state.pa.us/ENR_New/General/OfficeResults?OfficeID=11&ElectionID=41&ElectionType=G&IsActive=0
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:44, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: While this is a provocative and hypocritical situation, I do not believe his abortion request to Edwards should be in the lede section. It seems like that would be giving this situation undue weight in this article. I recommend removing it from the lede and keeping it in the Personal life section for now. Thoughts? Some of everything (talk) 21:26, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The only reason Murphy is sufficiently notable to have a Wikipedia entry is because he's a Congressman.  So the reason for why he's not seeking reelection is pertinent.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 135.23.190.27 (talk) 00:26, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree the situation is pertinent and relevant for inclusion in the article; however, I do not believe it belongs in the lede section of a BLP. We would typically not include the reason why a political candidate chooses not to seek reelection in this section. Some of everything (talk) 18:18, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abortion 

message: The information box says Shannon Edwards is his wife. The body of the article says that Shannon Edwards was the women with whom he had an affair and that she was currently married to another man. This inconsistency should be resolved. ____  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jnmwiki (talk • contribs) 23:09, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Good catch. His House biography page says his wife's name is Nan.  Earlier (as in last month) versions of this article list his wife as Nanette Missig. I'm thinking we should restore that, although it's possible his marital situation is in flux. --MelanieN (talk) 23:29, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spouse 

message: The following external link to a video should be removed because the video it points to has been taken down by youtube: The Last Word on YouTube compares two C-Span videos of his reactions to Medicare Part D (2006) and the Affordable Care Act (2013) Stablefiend (talk) 12:10, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Done SparklingPessimist Scream at me! 16:15, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 6 October 2017 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Tim Murphy (American politician). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050620200558/http://today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=domesticNews to http://today.reuters.com/news/newsarticle.aspx?type=domesticNews&storyid=2005-11-28T130557Z_01_ROB805851_RTRUKOC_0_US-IRAQ-CRASH.xml&rpc=22
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120523122532/http://republicans.energycommerce.house.gov/about/members.shtml to http://republicans.energycommerce.house.gov/about/members.shtml
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120523122245/http://republicans.energycommerce.house.gov/subcomms/subcommittees.shtml to http://republicans.energycommerce.house.gov/subcomms/subcommittees.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:47, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I see in the lede the word "mistress".  "Mistress" is derogatory and suggests an unequal relationship, such as a woman supported financially by a man for sex.  Since the woman in question has her own job and didn't depend on Murphy for anything, I find this term inappropriate.  I suggest it be changed to "lover".  Zaslav (talk) 01:50, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: You are quite right. The source says "lover" in the first paragraph and "girlfriend" in the second paragraph. "Mistress" is nowhere in the source. I will change it to "lover". Thanks. --MelanieN (talk) 01:53, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Mistress"? 

message: A new editor has repeatedly removed material from the lead about the circumstances of Murphy's resignation. Since this is clearly a relevant aspect of Murphy's biography (as reflected by independent, reliable sources and their coverage), it is necessary to mention it in the lead, per WP:LEAD. I'm not clear on the other objections, but maybe they could be discussed here? MastCell Talk 17:13, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead 

message: = many reviews (which is close-ish in meaning to 'abundant') or favourable reviews?
Regards to all,
Notreallydavid (talk) 03:17, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Abundant reviews'