lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Bicameral mentality

message: I have removed the section titled "Epic of Gilgamesh as a counter-example" as none of the sources used to support it even mention Jaynes. Sources must directly criticize Jayne's theories directly mentioning him as being refuted. Wikipedia editors may not combine sources to imply such a criticism. Skyerise (talk) 20:41, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Ensuing debate here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original_research/Noticeboard#Bicameral_mentality Snarcky1996 (talk) 23:02, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: You call that a debate? It simply proves you still have not read the examples at WP:SYNTH. Skyerise (talk) 23:21, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed section of original research 

message: Please see: Talk:Julian Jaynes#It needs to be made clearer that his overall hypothesis is WP:FRINGE.
Summary: Aspects of his hypothesis having "inspired" some later research doesn't equate to his work being proven correct, and cognitive science, evolutionary psychology, and related displines decreasingly support it, most especially his central notion that consciousness only arose a few millennia ago.  Furthermore, it was proposed at that article to move it and reshape it into an article on the book, since the person is not notable for anything other than one book. Instead, the subject has been WP:CFORKed (arguably WP:POVFORKed) into  further articles (The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind, and bicameral mentality). The bio mostly just repeats claims from the book article (but with barely any hint of controversy or challenge, and strong suggestions of influence), while the book article is mostly just repetition of what is said at the hypothesis article (but without much of the critical material from the latter).
It is thus proposed to merge these into a single article on the hypothesis, the book it came from, and who wrote it, with all the critical material present, and expanded by more recent work on consciousness and cognitition. Even if they were not merged, they have to stop viewpoint-forking (and coatracking of the hypothesis across all three articles).
Anyway, please follow up at the Talk:Julian_Jaynes discussion thread, so this stays centralized.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  14:20, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  MERGE, FRINGE
Talk:List of songs about school

message: "Good Riddance/Time of your life" is not a song about school, it's just often played at graduations. The song is actually about a relationship gone sour and is meant to be sarcastic. There is no mention of school anywhere.
is the fight song (MM) about school? i know the video is a school foot bal game but im not sureI am Paranoid 01:07, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What do you all think about adding Gaudeamus igitur to the list? It is not specifically about school, but it is totally associated with school and particularly college. --MelanieN (talk) 17:10, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Gaudeamus igitur]] 
Talk:Albert Sorel

message: This is mostly a 1911 EB article. I see that someone has put a cleanup tag on it. I remind whoever takes this on that the 1911 EB is a citable source, and that if you are trying to NPOV this, it's OK to quote the 1911 EB directly for its opinions. -- Jmabel | Talk 02:30, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: 1911

message: This article reads like an adoring obituary of the man and clearly does not meet Wikipedia's standards for an objective encyclopedic style. It should be rewritten entirely. 128.227.38.217 (talk) 05:41, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tone of article
Template talk:Non-free seal

message: This template can be switched to use  if an addition to the bulleted list is acceptable; I've drafted a new version of the template at Template:Non-free seal/sandbox. Yes, I know I can edit this template myself, but I'd like at least one other person agreeing. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 11:14, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Done — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:55, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 29 January 2020 

message: Please fix "Other uses of this image" to "Any other uses of this image"? (talk) 20:06, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Terasail[✉️] 20:27, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 14 March 2022 

message: Copy the code of Template:Non-free seal/sandbox. Including the default param 1= as well in an event cat= isn't specified in the template. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:55, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: — Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:37, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request
Talk:Grim Grinning Ghosts

message: I've attempted to explain all the facets of Grim Grinning Ghosts in reasonable detail.  Any and all positive modifications are welcome, naturally. Datameister 02:43, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe it's a G7/Bb chord, or something based on it. Datameister 17:28, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  Sorry, make that a Ab dim7/Bb chord. Datameister 01:00, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  Sorry again.  Make that an F and an E on the tubular bells, with Bb in the rhythm section.  Tubular bells have very weird acoustic properties, and I think that's the cause of all our confusion. Datameister 04:39, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've added a note of the full title of the song and an image of the vocal lead sheet. If it should be formatted differently on the page please feel free. Ste3ve 20:56, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Full title & sheet music
Talk:Missouri Route 13

message: *Blue Eye to Humansville  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Scott5114 (talk • contribs) 05:25, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jct list creation 

message: Many of these are messed up due to a template, and I'm unsure how to fix it.  Many of the signs shown are for highways which do NOT intersect 13, but neighboring junctions are included.  Apparently this has resulted in the highway markers being shown even though there is no intersection with 13.  This needs to be fixed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.130.211.77 (talk) 01:50, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Major Intersections
Talk:Missouri Route 14

message: 
I've removed the tag from article space as rather distracting and ugly - also noted above. If the project people have decreed such, then point it out on project talk rather than needlessly cluttering the article. Vsmith (talk) 22:09, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: This tag is not for the talk page. It is supposed to be put on the actual article page. I didn't have time to switch the section, so I put it on there. If you have a problem with that, take it to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U.S. Roads. Allen (Morriswa) (talk) 22:26, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Tag
Talk:National Stock Exchange of India

message: This article says that NSEI is the biggest, but BSE's says that BSE is the biggest, can anyone solve the problem? -Sitenl (talk) 22:10, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Checking most of this year's data and last year's, NSE has been consistently (although very very slightly) smaller, in terms of market cap, than BSE. C xong (talk) 04:49, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

text: I think NSE is biggest in term of number of listing and BSE is biggest on market cap. 06:26, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Biggest Stock Exchange of India 

message: I feel this article should be modified to meet Wikipedia standards. Dinesh Cyanam (talk) 06:24, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikify 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources.  Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Osiris (talk) 14:49, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Not moved. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 01:40, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 28 February 2022 

message: change the grammer in line 7 of the article's introduction from "a 50 stock index is used extensively by investors in India" to "a 50 stock index that is used extensively by investors in India"
/MINOR EDIT CinnamonStew34eh (talk) 10:14, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Corrected grammar. User:CanonNi (talk • contribs) 10:26, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 4 June 2024
Talk:European Aviation Air Charter

message: I'm happy to do the merge sometime, but don't know which name is correct for the merged article? --Scott Davis Talk 03:00, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Thankyou - looks good. --Scott Davis Talk 11:22, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: European still exist in 2022, just as European Aviation Limited operating aircraft part sales.
However, in Covid they did operate flights for cargo - and I believe still are.
Is it worth expanding this article to cover that?
Hopscotch27 (talk) 21:24, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  European Aviation Limited
Talk:Alain de Cadenet

message: he seems to be a TV personality in UK now but he's also one of the legend of the 24 hours of Le Mans. Ericd 00:37, 25 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion request

message: I see instances in this article of "Cadenet, Alain de".  Shouldn't they be "de Cadenet, Alain"?  That is common practice, isn't it?  Is it perhaps not Wikipedia practice, then?--SportWagon 16:28, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: One can say De Cadenet, Alain to force the alphabetization, but the entry title will be used in the Category listing.  An example doing that is Du Pré, Jacqueline in Jacqueline du Pré--SportWagon 17:31, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

text: I have gone ahead and made it De Cadenet, Alain since no-one discussed it either here, specifically, or more generically in project/style talk pages.  I don't ever recall seeing such names alphabetized not under "D" "in real life".--SportWagon 15:47, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Last Name?

message: Amanda de Cadenet isn't really very much longer, but it does have sections.  Perhaps we need some sections for Alain too.  But the article contains inaccuracies (he's no longer doing Barrett-Jackson) and contains no citations and a bit of non-NPOV.—SportWagon 05:50, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sections might destub?
Talk:Liahona (Book of Mormon)

message: Is there a reason to list the name of the Liahona in Arabic? The BoM was originally written in either Reformed Egyptian or English (depending on who you ask), so it does not provide any sort of improvement or clarification as it may in other scripture-related cases. In any case, those living in the time period would not speak or write the Arabic of today. I would suggest its removal, but if there is good reason for it to remain (perhaps relating to those mentioned on the BoM Arabic page), then by all means, leave it. Suggestions? Tijuana Brass 03:25, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arabic 

message: I modified the description of the Liahona as it is given in 1 Ne. 16:10. ICXCNIKA 22:40, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Description Modification
Talk:Paeonian language

message: After correcting an apparent error introduced into the text by the new material from the Italian article, I want some things double-checked: the etymology of Paionian Pontos does not look convincing; it may as well derive from PIE *pent-, "a path" from which Greek pontos ("sea") derives according to Pokorny, Watkins, etc.; I also looked in Pokorny and could not find *ponktos. I did find PIE *pen-, *penk- ("swamp, water, wet"), which may be the intended source of *ponktos. The Illyrian toponym Pannonia, per Pokorny at least, derives from the aformentioned PIE *pen-. Alexander 007 07:08, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There could be similar to Romanian "a înţepa", which means "to make a wicked remark", which is derived from "ţeapă", a stake or a spike. (cf. Vlad Ţepeş :-) bogdan 09:58, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Could be. Good idea. :-) Alexander 007 10:05, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Verifying info

message: From the article, The Indo-European voiced aspirates (*bh, *dh, etc) became plain voiced consonants (/b/, /d/, etc)...
:By the way, one thing that often trips me out: how does anyone really know that "voiced aspirates became unaspirated, etc." — as in the case of PIE *bh-->b and PIE *dh--->d, etc. — just because the plain letters were used for the sound in writing (ex: Doberos)? Many languages don't distinguish those sounds, which many people don't even consciously notice. In English, for example, the t in tap is usually aspirated, but it is still written tap, no extra letter or even diacritic to show aspiration. Alexander 007 12:03, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK I'm responding more than four years later, but you're confusing phonemes and allophones.  Speakers don't consciously notice allophones but do notice phonemes.  If b and bh were separate phonemes, then you can expect that someone creating their own alphabet from scratch would distinguish them.  Obviously alphabets aren't usually created from scratch, so it's possible that a given language has a distinction but doesn't write it because the source alphabet didn't have such a distinction. Benwing (talk) 06:36, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: . I came across an interesting thread there. I was just about to resume research to try to locate Lake Prasias on the map today and identify the paprax and tilon fish species, and I found that thread using Google. I think I had also previously considered that paprax may have been the perch fish, when I was checking out what fish are common in lakes of the area. In fact I previously did more research on tilon/psilon also but I put those notes aside and I don't know where I put those notes. 76.208.174.102 (talk) 01:55, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Check out this link for more info about Paionian:
Talk:Section 8 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

message: I've heard that bearers of a Restricted Firearms License are forced to give up this charter right, and can have themselves or their houses searched for weapons at any time. If someone who has more info on this subject sees this, please consider adding a relevant section to the article. --Photon Man62 (talk) 16:57, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gun owners 

message: When a CRA employee on their private time and in another person's private home sees or hears about tax fraud. Are they required to report it or are they prohibited from reporting by this law?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.103.184.76 (talk) 15:35, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  CRA employees
Talk:Mesh generation

message: I was tempted to add more but I am only a student of the field and am by no means knowledgeable enough for a comprehensive treatment of the subject. Anyone? Averisk 03:30, 1 November 2005 (UTC)

message: Grid generation already redirects to mesh generation. fgnievinski (talk) 05:19, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 18:34, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Principles of grid generation]] into [[Mesh generation]]
Talk:Section 10 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

message: In this article, as well as Section Nine of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, I essentially just copied the summary the court gave at para. 44 of the decision. Reading it over, I'm wondering if there's a need to covert some of the language into more lay terms for the average reader, such as latin terms like inter alia... Singularity42 (talk) 19:04, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Detention - R. v. Grant
Talk:Bassic

message: I've begun work on this page; ongoing process as I get the time. I should probably become a member, eh? No... nobody will read this anyway... Bassic is just cheesy electronica to most people.
:Hey, I read this, so thats a start. Bassic is pretty cheesy, I'll give you that, but some of his songs are pretty good. Although after I discovered Aphex I sort of forgot about Bassic. Those were the days... back when MP3.com actually offered free music. I hope you read this and realize that there are other people out there who listen to Bassic. In fact, I'm listening to him right now, as I write this. - Fuzzform 23:08, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Hi Fuzzform,
I read this! ;-)
Probably just a typo but "there is a discrepancy here!" LoL
You list "Daydreamer" under "2002–2004: Independent years", probably right as I could find this unreliable page with the following and other list it as 2002.
Исполнитель:   Bassic (Martin Lindhe)
Альбом: Daydreamer
Год выхода:  2003
Стиль: Electronica, New Age, Ambient
Количество треков: 16
Время звучания: 01:14:02
http://2olega.ru/load/30-1-0-737
But further down, under "Discography", you give 2005 as a release date. I think 2005 is only the iTune re-release date.
Just checking Aphex now... it's Aphex Twin rignt ?
Message to Martin Lindhe: Hey dude... help us help you... can you insert (right here in this "Talk" page a list of all your releases?
Thanks --
Netweezurd (talk) 18:24, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typo ?
Talk:Operation Black Tulip

message: The "A modern equivalent" section needs to be brought to a higher standard of writing... El T 03:32, 1 November 2005 (UTC)

message: My grandfather met my Grandmother in Germany, while he was put to work there. After the war ended, he took her with him to the Netherlands. She has been in a naturalisation Camp in South-Limburg, not far from the German border near Aachen. After that she was only allowed for a while (possible till 1951) to be on 1 address and only leave it for a few hours. 2001:1C03:491A:D900:118E:6090:79FC:FFC6 (talk) 13:00, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unknown
Talk:Reassurance marker

message: I think this misses the point of these markers.  They don't appear randomly along the route, but at a well-defined distance after each intersection.  That is, the purpose is not to "reassure drivers that they are traveling on the correct road", but to inform them of which road they are on after an interchange, which is not always clear.
:WP:BOLD. And they do appear in the middle of long intersection-less stretches. æle ✆ 00:06, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  2005 comments 

message: Not to stir the pot, but it seems to me that the article should be named Confirming marker, since that's the predominant use.  Reassurance shield assemblies only show up periodically, by design, and usually not at all in urban areas, since intersections are spaced so closely, and thus these would be confirming assemblies, per the MUTCD. Mapsax (talk) 19:52, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You're probably right about "reassurance marker"; it does seem to be used by official agencies for trail blazes, but not for highway markers. "Confirming marker" isn't used either though; it's "confirming assembly" in the MUTCD. --NE2 07:29, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name?

message: I've located a picture of reassurance markers on Ontario's Highway 401, which I think looks better than the existing picture of the US 221 marker uploaded by Alerante (not as blurry and vertically imposing). I'm moving the US 221 picture here just so it doesn't get orphaned. - Hinto (talk) 22:17, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this picture can safely be orphaned... it's not too difficult to take better pictures of reassurance / confirming markers. —Rob (talk) 14:09, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: US 221 picture

message: I take exception to New Zealand and Australia as one topic. Regardless of the fact they are two completely different countries, the route numbering systems in Australia are vastly different in scope and scale, making the system incomparable to N.Z. with the exception that Australia State and/or Metropolitain Routes are the same shape, but are nonetheless a different colour (Blue compared to Red). As this is the case, lumping Hong Kong (Yellow Bullet) in with New Zealand would certainly appear more accurate.
119.161.71.12 (talk) 12:36, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Australia and New Zealand
Talk:2005 Melbourne Cup

message: Let's see how fast this can get updated... - Ta bu shi da yu 03:34, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm still not clear. Channel 7's coverage was... crap. I had no idea who was coming first, last or in-between! - Ta bu shi da yu 04:14, 1 November 2005 (UTC)

text: I have to admit I found it funny, but its not suitable for an encyclopedia article. Its been added to BJODN-- Astrokey44 12:24, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: "The winner of this years race Makybe Diva who was trained by Lee Freedman wore a bridle used by her recently deceased stable mate Mummify, who was put down after injuring a leg yet still placing in the Caufield Cup."
moving removed section to talk page which had been added by Special:Contributions/203.206.111.34, Astrokey44 12:57, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interesting Fact 

message: Hi jockey and trainer are transposed  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.141.65.172 (talk) 09:10, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your comment. I will fix it. Cuddy Wifter (talk) 22:22, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Table
Talk:R v Butler

message: I've given this article some much-needed expansion, so that it says something.  Please note, however, that I've covered free speech and section 1, and some background, so there are large sections of the decision dealing with definitions of the obscenity law still left to do, and prior judicial history, and the concurrence.  CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 21:56, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guide to expansion
Talk:Battle of Palo Duro Canyon

message: Native American tribal flags that were not in use at the time of the battle may not be included in the article, as per WP:MOSFLAG. Sensei48 (talk) 07:11, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flags 

message: The following coordinate fixes are needed for
—172.3.221.140 (talk) 16:12, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: You haven't said what you think is wrong with the coordinates in the article, but I've emended them somewhat to be less precise and to correspond to the approximate location of the Indian villages that were attacked, near the juncture of the Prairie Dog Branch and Cita Creek and outside the boundary of Palo Duro Canyon State Park, as shown in the diagram on p. 106 of Battles of the Red River War: Archeological Perspectives on the Indian Campaign of 1874. With regard to the statement in your heading, the Fourth Cavalry under Mackenzie was apparently based at Fort Clark at the time, but, as the article says, Mackenzie led his troops to Fort Concho on the way to this battle. Deor (talk) 23:31, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mackenzie departed from Ft. Concho to engage in the Red River War, not Ft. Clark!