Talk:Swordstick

message: I'm not sure how to add the disclaimer that Wikipedia is not a reliable source of legal advice, but it really should be added. (I'm talking about the predesigned marker thingie.)—Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.95.23.122 (talk • contribs) 06:37, 3 December 2006
:An interesting discussion on the issue of disclaimers:
Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion/Log/2006_May_30#Template:Legal_disclaimer. John Vandenberg 07:06, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Simply put, the swordstick is legally ambiguous in some jurisdictions. It may be a concealed weapon, hence a permit would be required to carry a concealed weapon. OR it could be a disguised weapon, most jurisdictions that I'm aware of prohibit disguised weapons being carried, hence a swordstick or a gun cane would be illegal (actually, the gun cane is classified as an AOW under US federal law) to carry. The article is fairly clear, for those acquainted with concealed weapons laws, not as clear for those who are not versed in such laws. Perhaps a link to concealed weapons or concealed carry would be in order, for in legal circles, a concealed weapon is a concealed weapon, be it a firearm or sword. As for federal law, a swordstick isn't illegal to carry or possess, save on federal property, otherwise, federal law is silent regarding it. Hence, it is a state or community matter for legality of possession or carry.Wzrd1 (talk) 14:49, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

message: I took the liberty of editing this page. I thought a few parts needed clarification. First, it is unknown when the invention was, but since the basic model is easy to create, we have to assume that it would have been around for quite some time. However, the popularity of such a device would have grown as decorative swords were no longer a popular fashion accessory because firearms were coming into use, although a gentleman generally did not carry a firearm loaded (his assistants may), thus the need for some other sort of protection. 
Second, there are several different kinds of sword cane, made in a variety of styles. Most today are meant as a collectible, or a novelty, so are not well constructed for self defense or as a weapon 9although it could easily be used as one). Furthermore, they are not designed to be as supportive as a real walking cane, so are not generally recommended for use as a supportive device. I included a link to a popular walking canes website where one might see the popular designs. 
I also added a disclaimer, just a text disclaimer, that people should check their local laws and statutes about regulations on concealed arms and weapons.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mb327 (talk • contribs) 02:28, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  my editions 

message: * I have removed the many cases of dead links and dead piping (internal links within Wikipedia) in this article. I have also removed the above person's disclaimer as per: Wikipedia:No disclaimers in articles. There is a general disclaimer link at the bottom of every page and any future additions of a disclaimer will be removed. 
* This article is completely unreferenced and I have added a template to that effect. bwmcmaste (talk) 07:47, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corrections 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Swordstick. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20121220140435/http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/waffg_2002/anlage_2_82.html to http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/waffg_2002/anlage_2_82.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:49, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified