lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:David St. Hubbins

message: Hey everyone, I just wanted to help fill up this article with some more information using my "Official Guide to Spinal Tap".  Just want to add some quotes and give it a little more detail.  -fkg
Do you all think this is ready to move beyond "stub status"? -fkg
Yeah, great job fkg. Bib 22:11, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Adding Information

message: Good article, but there are some direct quotes from the film that should be cited as such. PurpleChez (talk) 20:26, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  citations
Talk:Columbia (song)

message: I have to wonder if this is worth listing under the Oasis singles banner.  It wasn't commercially available to buy anywhere, it being limited to a promotional only release.  There have been numerous Oasis songs which have been sent out as promos, but none of them (with the exception of some of the American Radio singles), qualify as singles.  I think the White Label release of Columbia is another one of these.
:You're right, it's not. It's just a promotional release.--91.177.235.162 (talk) 16:41, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Catherine Coll

message: ADMINISTRATOR: PLEASE CORRECT PAGE NAME-- IT SHOULD BE CATHERINE COLL WHEELWRIGHT, NOT CATHERINE COLL DE VALERA WHEELWRIGHT BECAUSE EVERYBODY AGREES (INCLUDING TIM PAT COOGAN) THAT SHE NEVER MARRIED DE VALERA (OR DE VALEROS). THANKS. Trafalgar007 01:28, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: How is she notable apart form being the mother of a notable person? FunkMonk (talk) 12:00, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability?
Category talk:Television stations

message: Working on consistent subcategory namings here, for the various nations.
Predominant usage is "Television stations in <country name>", so this would be the most consistent usage. For example, the category "Argentine television stations" becomes "Television stations in Argentina". Also, references to "channels" should change to "stations", since this is the category naming (and "channel" implies a specific broadcast frequency rather than a broadcast service).
Dl2000 04:26, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think we first need more concensus on what constitutes television channel, television station, television broadcast, television network.  - The DJ 23:41, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consistent naming pattern
Talk:Donald's Quack Attack

message: When did Donald's Quack Attack debut? I've searched everywhere and have found no clear debut date.
Probably 1992. WizardDuck 17:07, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Debut

message: Did Walt Disney Productions rename itself “The Walt Disney Company” in the 1990s, or has that been just six of one thing and half a dozen of another? I’m asking because in the end credits of Good Morning, Mickey!, Donald Duck Presents, and maybe Mousterpiece Theater as well, there was a message that said, “The cartoons in this program are the work of animators from Walt Disney Productions over the past 50 years” (obviously because the shows came from 1980s Disney Channel). Mickey’s Mouse Tracks and Donald’s Quack Attack were 1990s shows with the same cartoons. Therefore, the message in the end credits of those shows replaces 50 with 60, but I do not quite know why the message includes the word “Company” instead of “Productions” after the name Walt Disney. I would only guess that meant a new name. Cbsteffen (talk) 21:11, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Walt Disney Company vs. Walt Disney Productions
Talk:Digital on-screen graphic

message: Can someone make some world maps for digital on-screen graphic behaviours?113.165.166.16 (talk) 08:42, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  New idea 

message: This entire page is so desperately short of citations it falls well short of standards. Those that are there are old, broken or irrelevant. 31.94.4.145 (talk) 05:31, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations
Talk:Radicand

message: I don't think this is really a stub. Dfeuer 05:04, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub?

message: What the heck is a "HUGE DUTY" ?  Should the phrase be replaced?  I think so, as I'm not in any way familiar with a HUGE DUTY. Dylan Knight Rogers 22:58, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  HUGE DUTY
Talk:Rotterdam The Hague Airport

message: Starting this summer Flyorange will hire Air Via for weekly flights to Al Hoceima and Tetuan  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.205.38.125 (talk) 09:31, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Air Via operates charter flights  

message: I found out that Aegean Airlines does a seasonal charter between Heraklion-Groningen-Rotterdam. Shall I put it in? Daniël Nefs  —Preceding undated comment added 15:32, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aegean Airlines 

message: TUI is not operating to Nador and Oujda from Rotterdam but from Eindhoven!
Check their schedule and data of flightradar24  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.205.38.125 (talk) 13:08, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tuifly Belgium
Talk:Financial instrument

message: This entire section should probably be deleted.  It is an attempt to present the classification of financial instruments for financial statement purposes, yet it does not indicate this.  Additionally, the information it presents for 2 possible classifications is incomplete "???", and there are three other classifications that it does not even discuss, nor are references provided as to which accounting standards are quoted (there are differences in accounting standards between countries, expecialy in the area of financial insturments).
11:03, 4 Febuary 2008
:I am definitely against the deletion of this section. Financial instruments is a labyrinth, and this is the most clear classification I have ever seen. More detail is definitely needed, but deletion? No way!!!!88.234.170.245 (talk) 11:53, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Measuring Financial Instrument's Gain or Loss

message: Financial instruments are cash, evidence of an ownership interest in an entity, or a contractual right to receive, or deliver, cash or another financial instrument.
:This is a self referring definition - but I can't think how to rephrase it Rattle (talk)  —Preceding undated comment was added at 19:41, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The self reference I'm sure was intended because a financial instrument may be a contractual right to receive or deliver another financial instrument. i.e. I agree to deliver 200 shares in BP on a given date. Get it?    —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.141.83.185 (talk) 22:30, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know independently of this article what a financial instrument is, but I would have to wager that this sentence needs semi-colons instead of commas: "Financial instruments are cash; evidence of an ownership interest in an entity; or a contractual right to receive, or deliver, cash or another financial instrument." --207.172.165.78 (talk) 15:07, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Lead Section

message: In the table, where Cross Currency Swaps should be? Along with Interes Rate Swaps?? 190.22.162.56 (talk) 04:56, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: additional entry
Talk:Sky lobby

message: Didn't the John Hancock Center use skylobbies first? Ouuplas 05:42, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  WTC was the first to use them? 

message: WHY is the World Trade Center in this article? It's demolished by a terrorist attack, never exists to be taken up again, yet the article acts like the buildings are still standing, they're not, they're GONE, demolished, forever forgotten, please remove them from this article, as they don't need to remain, as they are gone. Thank you.--75.0.33.123 (talk) 11:09, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: As some of the first buildings to contain a sky lobby, the WTC twin towers are highly relevant to the sky lobby article. This article clearly says that the WTC is no longer standing. Graham87 14:22, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  WTC? 

message: This article assumes that the problems a sky-lobby resolves are only those related to great height. I've noticed that when a new modern building is a lollipop over a very short pre-War building, there is a sky-lobby between the 20th and 30th floors, as at the lollipop on top of Saks Fifth Avenue and the one at 450 Lexington Avenue built on top of what was then and maybe still is a United States Post Office. Why is it that in a building of fewer than 50 storeys they cannot make an elevator go all the way to the top without a transfer through a sky-lobby on a VERY LOW floor?74.64.104.99 (talk) 04:24, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: This Article doesn't address skylobbies in short buildings

message: The first image described as the "sky lobby in the Central Plaza at Hongkong" is wrongly posted here as it evidently doesn't show a sky lobby!
The same image is used on the article "Central Plaza (Hong Kong)" and described there as "the Sky City Church lounge area" and the Sky City Church is located on the 75th floor (of 78 total), so in the apex, not on the "intermediate floor" according to the sky lobby definition and has nothing in common with the elevators 212.160.202.160 (talk) 13:21, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The wrong image of the "sky lobby" at Central Plaza, Hongkong
Talk:Martin Buber/I-thou notes

message: From Martin Buber's I and Thou; ISBN: 0684717255; p. 14.
Walter Kaufman translates 'I-Thou' as 'I—You' {better, for english, I-thee as in "with this ring, I thee wed".}. 
:I-thee sounds unfamiliar. What we are accustomed to is I-Thou. But man's attitudes are manifold, and Thou and You are not the same. Nor is Thou very similar to the German Du {thee}. 
:German lovers say Du to one another, and so do friends. Du is spontaneous and unpretentious, remote from formality, pomp, and dignity. 
:What lovers or friends say Thou one another? Thou is scarcely ever said spontaneously. 
:Thou immediately brings to mind God; Du {thee} does not. And the God of whom it makes us think is not the G-D to whom one might cry out in gratitude, despair, or agony, not the G-D to whom one complains or prays spontaneously: it is the God of the pulpits, the God of the holy tone. 
:When men pray spontaneously or speak directly to G-D, without any mediator, without any intervention of formulas, when they speak as their heart tells them to speak instead of repeating what is printed, do they say Thou?
 
Yesselman 15:44, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  I and thee 

message: From Martin Buber's I and Thou; ISBN 0684717255; p.127.
<Comment on the phrase in Buber--whose work centered around the ideals of religious consciousness, interpersonal relations, and community.>
:In the relation to G-D, unconditional exclusiveness and unconditional inclusiveness are one. For those who enter into the absolute relationship, nothing particular retains any importance—neither things nor beings, neither earth nor heaven—but everything is included in the relationship. For entering into the pure relationship does not involve ignoring everything but seeing everything in the thee, not renouncing the world but placing it upon its proper ground. Looking away from the world is no help toward G-D; staring at the world is no help either; but whoever beholds the world in him stands in his presence. "World here, G-D there"—that is It-talk; and "G-D in the world"—that, too, is It-talk; but leaving out nothing, leaving nothing behind, to comprehend all—all the world—in comprehending the the, giving the world its due and truth, to have nothing besides G-D but to grasp everything in him, that is the perfect relationship.
Yesselman 23:28, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Complete Relationship
Talk:Akane Tendo

message: Just a note: Although Ranma says "Kawaikunai" he pronounces it "Kawaikune", possibly to sound more aggressive. Nevertheless, "Kawaikune" is gramatically and contextually incorrect.
60.224.48.152 05:51, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Note

message: I would like to point this out, since it appears there's some confusion about it.
Kurumi and Natsume are not related to Akane, Nabiki and Kasumi and they apparently are not canon characters; In the OVA 'Akane and her sisters' where they appear, it is shown that Soun never recognizes them as daughters once Happosai appears and explains how he told them (lied to them is more likely) that Soun was their father. Therefore, Kurumi and Natsume are not related to the three Tendo daughters and are not their stepsisters.
As for the aliases, Akane is not called those names all the time in the manga or the anime (only Ranma calling her uncute/tomboy and Shampoo has called Akane 'pervert-girl' a few times), it is true that Akane said those names in the manga when asked to play a part for the drama club, but nobody calls her that everyday so I think they don't qualify as aliases. Facer 06:15, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Kurumi and Natsume and aliases

message: The question, to the one who is editing lately every character in the Ranma 1/2 section, do you have to list all the people in the anime and manga who has ever, no matter how briefly had a problem with Akane (and other characters) listed in the rivals sections? It serves no use since they are not her main rivals and they are not really very important characters. Look, I know it's nice to see your changes here and all, but this is not a contest about how much you know about the manga and anime. It's only about trying to make a concrete and useful article, not a word by word transcript of the manga.
I agree...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by BrianGo28 (talk • contribs) 02:48, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just one thing. 

message: The References section contains 10 references of which 8 ambiguous. When referencing sources you need to provide enough information to find the source. These references need to be corrected or removed. -- allen四names 03:17, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ambiguous references 

message: The first or second edition can be used as they are effectively the same.
* Ledoux, Trish; Ranney, Doug. "Anime Genres". The Complete Anime Guide. First edition. p. 60. December 1995. .
* Ledoux, Trish; Ranney, Doug. "Anime Genres". The Complete Anime Guide. Second edition. p. 65. February 1997. .
I hope this is useful. – allen四names 04:39, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:George David Birkhoff

message: The AMS has an prize named for him, ref. --Billymac00 (talk) 04:38, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Award in his name 
Talk:Crawcrook

message: How about something on the accent? - I'm thinking about the way 'Crawcrook' is pronounced locally (and the rest of T+W finding it amusing)?   90.208.205.56 (talk) 14:14, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  LOCAL ACCENT 

message: I'm removing the 'noticeable persons' section unless someone can provide a reliable source of how they're noticeable. MIVP - Allow us to be of assistance to you. (Maybe a bit of tea for thought?) 21:04, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Noticeable Persons 

message: Would advise removing the adjective "picturesque" in paragraph 2 of section "surrounding area," on the grounds that Prudhoe isn't picturesque in the slightest.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.208.76.152 (talk) 12:42, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picturesque Villages?
Talk:List of Caribbean Jews

message: Why non-Latin?  The early Caribbean Jewish communities were largely Sephardic. --Gruepig 06:23, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  non-Latin? 

message: The link is broken.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.180.39.121 (talk) 03:15, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bob Marley? 

message: I am trying to verify/cite as many of these names as possible, and one immediate problem that's jumping out is: how are we defining Caribbean Jews? A number of the people I've looked at so far are members of the diaspora who were born outside the Caribbean and never lived there, and/or who have their Jewish ancestry through their non-Caribbean side. (Two examples: José Antonio Bowen, with a Jewish father and Cuban mother, and Eric Andre, with a Haitian father and Jewish mother; both were born in the U.S. and have never lived in the Caribbean.) 
Can we agree to a definition we can all work from? Right now, the page refers to "countr[ies] of origin," so that would seem to eliminate both members of the diaspora and Jewish immigrants to the Caribbean. Beginning (talk) 09:49, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: On a related note, I just removed all of the entries with no articles or refs . Some of them may actually be notable if anyone wants to write articles about them. As it was there was no evidence as to their notability, their Jewish heritage (other than assumptions based on names) , or their connection to the Caribbean. Some were clearly not notable. Meters (talk) 19:36, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Criteria for inclusion
Talk:Thomas Bradwardine

message: One person, two articles. One needs to be the article, the other a redirect. Studerby 21:29, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Go for it! I missed it in my pull through the Archbishops. Ealdgyth | Talk 21:35, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal

message: Someone changed Cantor's (?) reference from algebra to calculus giving the "fact" that calculus had been introduced from the arabs a century earlier. Actually BOTH calculus and algebra have parallel developments for thousands of years. While modern algebra may have come from the arabs fairly recently both disciplines have been around for a long long time and nobody gets sole credit for any of it. The question still is - what word goes in the paragraph? If Cantor used algebra, algebra goes there not calculus, however irrational it may seem to a reader. Maybe a longer explanation is needed. Student7 12:28, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You state: ″Actually BOTH calculus and algebra have parallel developments for thousands of years. While modern algebra may have come from the arabs fairly recently both disciplines have been around for a long long time and nobody gets sole credit for any of it.″ You really have to provide sources for this - of scholarly quality. --Gerard1453 (talk) 17:25, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Algebra vs Calculus

message: The DNB article is now available at s:Bradwardine, Thomas (DNB00) billinghurst sDrewth 14:59, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  DNB article available 

message: — Assignment last updated by K8shep (talk) 16:13, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: History of Medieval and Early Modern Science

message: I will be adding two new paragraphs in the science page, one covers Bradwardine's examination of ratios, the other is a possible link between his work and Al-Kindi's. Kasmy (talk) 17:24, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additions 

message: I will be adding a few more sentences on his early history. Kjhrdt (talk) 17:40, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Just make the additions, no need for this comment. — Moops ⋠T⋡ 18:23, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: New Additions

message: I will be making more additions to the Science section, as well as the section surrounding memory. Kasmy (talk) 17:24, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  More Additions for History of Medieval and Early Modern Science class
Talk:Horno

message: Is horno as "mud adobe built outdoor oven used by Native Americans and early settlers of North America" just an example of the use of the Spanish word in English, or are there other aspects? Pol098 06:28, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [untitled]

message: I would not recommend merging this into the main Oven article. However, I think a reasonable case could be made for merging into Masonry oven, though there's a fair amount of cultural baggage attached to clay/adobe ovens that might be served by a separate article (i.e. as is; compare banal oven). Haikupoet 01:14, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Mass merge proposal to [[Oven]]
Talk:Lionel Messi

message: The redirect The World's Top Goal Scorer 2011 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:10, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:The World's Top Goal Scorer 2011]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Roshan Seth

message: The following unsourced section has bee removed pending (A) citations from reliable sources which verify it; and (B) adequate rationale for including it in the article. Softlavender (talk) 09:56, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed unsourced material 

message: Seth is of a mixed ancestry, his father was from Lahore and his mother was from Bihar, she herself being born of a white mother from England and a U.K. returned Muslim barrister called Syed Khilafat Hussain, who hailed from a family of landlords of a village called Orain (Uren), in Lakhisarai District of Bihar.
----
Softlavender (talk) 09:56, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Family background 
Talk:Minnesota Center for Twin and Family Research

message: "Twins are valuable to researchers because they share 100% of genes in identical twins and 50% of genes in fraternal twins."
The first part of this is true (except in very rare cases, like if one twin has Turner's syndrome), but as far as I know there's no specific amount of DNA shared by all fraternal twins.  They can have as much or as little in common as any other siblings, as genetically speaking, they're just siblings who happened to gestate together.
:Speaking off-hand, I believe 50% is considered the average amount that any non-identical siblings share.--Nectar 10:43, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have substantially cleaned up this article. I replaced the denialist literature on the bottom with the most commonly used textbook. I have added proper inline citation for various claims and removed the manually cited references. Deleted a section that was a copy paste job and deleted another section that was out of place. None of these had any citations, so the loss is pretty small. The article is now alright, but could be improved upon by e.g. inclusion of a figure of the findings. --Deleet (talk) 18:11, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 29th October 2016 

message: Can someone please add a few sentences -- including possibly changing the order of the paragraphs -- to show the relationship of Dr. Bouchard's work (which was started in 1979) to the rest of the study (started in 1983)? Right now it is unclear and confusing. Thanks. Tina Kimmel (talk) 00:38, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs additional clarification 

message: This page should really be renamed to "Minnesota Center for Twin and Family Research". The "Minnesota Twin Family Study" is but one of multiple twin studies (and adoption study) within this research center. The page as it stands describes multiple of these studies, including the Minnesota Twin Family Study. At the same time, it describes the Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart, a separate and independent study led by a different investigator, although conducted within the University of Minnesota. I will work on the renaming in the next few weeks if there are no suggestions otherwise. Vrie0006 (talk) 12:28, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minnesota Center for Twin and Family Research