lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Category talk:NBCUniversal Entertainment Japan

message: Is this cat for anime created by Geneon Entertainment, anime released by Geneon Entertainment (USA), or both? Or something else entirely? Neither the title nor the description make this clear. Shiroi Hane (talk) 22:13, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Both. I've adjusted the description to help make that clearer. AnmaFinotera (talk) 00:16, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scope 

message: Shouldn't this be renamed to something like "Anime [verb]ed by Geneon"? --Masamage ♫ 03:07, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmmm...no, because it is in keeping with the other categories :Category:Tokyopop, :Category:Viz Media, etc. We'd have to rename them all, and it would be hard to find a single version. Geneon both produces (Japan side) and used to license and release in US. AnmaFinotera (talk) 03:35, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, huh. I thought for sure that was the standard naming system. Oh well! --Masamage ♫ 04:03, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming
Talk:Keyence Corporation of America

message: The current version is written like an advertisement. If you wish to remove the "advert" tag, please improve the article first. --Krtek2125 (talk) 22:56, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Advertisement-like

message: Keyence Corporation of America is just a subsidiary of Keyence Corporation. Why do we need to describe "Global" "Philosophy" "Trivia" "Products" etc. of Keyence Japan (parent company) in this article? --Krtek2125 (talk) 22:56, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Global, Philosophy, Trivia, Products, etc.
Talk:High Desert (Oregon)

message: *https://oregonencyclopedia.org/articles/high_desert/#.WxfmMmaZPfY ---Another Believer (Talk) 13:48, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  OE source
Category talk:ADV Films

message: Per discussion on in the Anime and Manga project, consensus felt that the releases of US companies, including ADV, are much better handled by a category than a never completed list.  While ADV doesn't produce anime itself, it has released hundreds of titles.  
As a side note, the previous CFD closed with only one comment, and was submitted by anonymous user. It didn't seem like a thorough discussion at all. AnmaFinotera (talk) 06:32, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Recreation of category
Talk:List of Fushigi Yûgi characters

message: I just changed the name from that to that so it will be consistent allthroughout. The Former being the chinese version and the latter being the japanese version of that name. The anime uses the Japanese names but Viz's translations uses the Chinese names. Triadwarfare (talk) 17:15, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Name change from Tai-Yi Jun to Taiitsukun

message: All the character pages have now been merged into List of Fushigi Yūgi characters.  Most of them lacked the notability to stand on their own.  If there are disagreements, please discuss before trying to remake the page.  A22 (talk) 22:47, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The infoboxes should not have been put in here and have been removed. Genbu Kaiden's characters probably should have been merged to its own article or to its own list. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 04:20, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging Character Pages 

message: I noticed that some of the characters (like the main ones) are lacking notes of who voices them. I'm not sure who voices who, so could somebody who does fix it? ~Reika 04:18, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Voice Actors 

message: There's a lot of original research going on in here. I just had to edit to remove the statements that said that Keisuke and Mayo absolutely became a couple at the end of Eikoden. It's heavily implied that they would but it's never actually stated and barring the creator herself stating that the two of them got together, we can only go by what the material showed us.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 10:05, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too in-universe and too much OR
Talk:List of Fushigi Yûgi episodes

message: I hope you'll add episodes for the three OVAs as well. The English titles at least can be found on Anime News Network as well. Munin (talk) 17:50, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I will :) AnmaFinotera (talk) 17:57, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Nice! It had been two days so I almost got bold, but I'm glad I waited! Munin (talk) 13:21, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No prob :)  This list is very much still a work in progress since the main article didn't really have a list to speak of.  I'm still trying to find the Japanese names of the OVAs...for some reason Studio Pierrot made episode lists for the main series and Eikoden, but not the other two OVAs. *doh* AnmaFinotera (talk) 15:10, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: OVA eps

message: Are these episode summaries accurate enough? -Malkinann (talk) 04:48, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, those should work, though Miaka also thought about food and dating first LOL. I've added an intro and done a little more work, but I think I'll call it a night for any more heavy editing.  If you want to add the episode summaries for the ones you've seen, don't forget to wikify characters' names to the list the first time they appear (if they are in the list) :)  I suspect that once all of the summaries are done, along with intros and stuff, we may have to split this into three lists, but for now its easier to work with it as one. :) AnmaFinotera (talk) 04:53, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I just find it's funny that saving a whole country is easier than taking the high school entrance exams!!! -Malkinann (talk) 05:01, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, but saving the whole country includes being surrounded by gorgeous men who are proclaiming their love ;) AnmaFinotera (talk) 05:06, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: episode summary
Talk:Jeanne de Clisson

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment Drives
Want to help write or improve biographies? Check out WikiProject Biography Tips for writing better articles. -- Yamara ✉ 23:11, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: I deleted the 2007-2013 version of the article because it was copied from a 2006 h2g2 article, currently hosted at http://h2g2.com/edited_entry/A14066408. See Wikipedia:Guide for h2g2 Researchers for further information on h2g2 copyright, and see WP:CPI for information on the speedy deletion procedure. I put the h2g2 article in the "External links" section, so readers who prefer the old content can read it there.
What remains is a one-sentence stub. We can't claim without attribution that de Clisson engaged in piracy for 13 years, because some accounts speak of a land war with only a couple naval encounters. I added some more reputable-looking sources in the "Further reading" section. Unfortunately, the better sources are written in Spanish or French, and most aren't readable online. Someone who is fluent in Spanish or French, and/or has physical access to the books, might be able to expand the article. The Dutch- and Spanish-language Wikipedia articles are also in better shape, so they could be translated here. There's more info at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia#Translating from other language Wikimedia Projects. Cheers, Melchoir (talk) 09:03, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: What makes you think h2g2 didn't copy from Wikipedia? It seems more likely.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.38.135.39 (talk) 11:27, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Ordinarily, yes, that would be a strong possibility. In this case, the h2g2 article was written in 2006, and the Wikipedia article was started in 2007. So unless one of the websites is forging their dates, it's impossible that h2g2 copied from Wikipedia. Melchoir (talk) 11:33, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

text: I've re-read the relevant policies, and I think it might not be necessary to keep the history hidden, unless the content creator asks for it. I'll undelete the old revisions, so that anyone can compare the dates and content for themselves. (Of course, please do not take this as an opportunity to re-insert the copyrighted content.) Melchoir (talk) 11:55, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

text: ...Done! Melchoir (talk) 11:58, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The Chronographia Regum Francorum mentions (Vol. II, p.206) that with many men she killed many French merchants at sea. Pat22 (talk) 13:24, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  January 2014 recreation
Talk:List of Supermarine Spitfire operators

message: This article really needs properly citing - these two operators in particular are suspect and need reliable sources to back them up.Nigel Ish (talk) 14:21, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I saw one IP who adds info about Phillipines in several articles and all are without sources and are not really reliable. Childish games or another "I'm proud of my country" editor? Regards, Piotr Mikołajski (talk) 14:34, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  China and Phillipines? 
Talk:Aidan Baker

message: I understand that this page was previously deleted for non-notability. However, having not seen the deleted version, I have made a new one which cites several instances of notability, such as album releases and tours. = ∫tc 5th Eye 23:13, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The man is pure genius, a deity, and if anyone deletes this page, I'll blow him/her out of the water. Zero Thrust (talk) 12:34, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recreation of page 

message: Please; if someone extends the discography on this article, would you be so mind to do the same on the Dutch article; he is releasing so much! Thank you in advance. Ceescamel, writer Dutch article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.241.101.108 (talk) 10:47, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discography
Template talk:List of airlines in Europe

message: We should add a section dedicated to former countries. I created the List of airlines of Yugoslavia and I plan to create a List of airlines of Serbia and Montenegro (FR Yugoslavia 1992-2003, Serbia and Montenegro 2003-2006). Other possible lists can be Czechoslovakia, Soviet Union, West Germany and East Germany. I am not sure if Saarland had airline companies. FkpCascais (talk) 13:22, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Former countries not really relevant as these should relate to List of defunct airlines of Europe, I have also renamed List of airlines of Yugoslavia to List of defunct airlines of Yugoslavia to match others in the defunct series. MilborneOne (talk) 17:02, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Former countries
Talk:Poleconomy

message: We used to have a copy (New Zealand edition) when I was a kid. I can't remember al the details but one of the perks of being prime minister was setting whether the inflation rate would go up or down. Prices for companies and rents were a multiple of the rate. So if you had most of the companies alreadsy you'd set the rate upwards to increase your rents. I also recall many of the companies on the board being wiped out in the 1987 stock market crash... Lisiate (talk) 23:16, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: cheers, i've adjusted the text. gotta reference for the stock market crash? sounds interesting. Boomshanka (talk) 14:31, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Would US Patent no. 4,522,407 be about the game? I can't remember the details. -- Avenue (talk) 01:27, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible patent

message: When was it first published? TheGames says 1983. BoardGameGeek says 1977 and that the Canadian edition was re-published in 1983.  Thomas and Young in the NBR article refer to it as "this 1983 homegrown competitor to Monopoly". Nurg (talk) 11:22, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The 1977 date appears to be wrong. Nurg (talk) 11:45, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  First published 

message: As an ex-owner of this inane game, I resent the amount of time I wasted on it in the 1980's. By modern standards it was grotesquely simplistic. As to the various "national" editions, I think they expoited the different markets by pretending to have genuine "local" content when they had none.I suspect too that the companies paying for the advertising of their brands ( a tax write -off ?) served to subsidise the cost of the game to consumer buyers, a further exploitation of those consumers Feroshki (talk) 04:29, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Grotesque by modern standards ?
Talk:Elevator (Flo Rida song)

message: The girls dancing in the big room make abnormal movements with their hips
Abnormal acording to which standards? is this part not biased? --TiagoTiago (talk) 17:55, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  biased? 

message: "because "L" is the first letter of "elevator". "
Uh, no. It isn't. subst:nosubst heymegan<33   xo | ** [[User talk:heymegan| | :] ]] 18:16, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: What Now?
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Opera/Article styles and formats

message: Can someone remind me why the guideline overleaf uses parentheses around the conductor's entry? I suggest to remove them there, and from now on in articles, too. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 13:29, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Conductor in parentheses

message: The guideline overleaf recommends that the section "Performance history" appear before "Roles". This doesn't seem to be widely followed and is disputed in this edit summary. What should be done? -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 05:35, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Michael, I've added a note re the alternative of placing that section after the synopsis. We could also explicitly change the position in the guidelines. However, the note at the top of the page probably covers this: . There are good arguments for either position, frankly. When I write articles on individual operas, I usually have a combined "Background and performance history" section right after the lede. However, for long detailed FAs, it makes sense to put that section after the synopsis, especially because such articles have longish, well-developed ledes which cover the key points of the background and performance history. Plus the well-known opera warhorses usually have quite lengthy performance histories. On the other hand, the table of contents allows the reader to skip to whatever section they're mainly interested in anyway. I'll notify the main OP talk page to get some more input. Voceditenore (talk) 09:44, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Section order – Performance history
Talk:Thakeham

message: You may be able to get more photos from this website - http://freespace.virgin.net/michael.bird/thakeham - if still up. Sadly blocked by work firewalls so I can't have a look myself! Nuttycow (talk) 13:34, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

message: Guidelines at Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements state that ideally the civil parish should be the catch-all article, avoiding single line articles on every village and landmark within the parish.
Therefore, I suggest that villages within the parish with a one or two sentence article, ie Warminghurst  to be merged and redirected to this parish article. ++ MortimerCat (talk) 07:58, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 
Talk:Washington, West Sussex

message: Guidelines at Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements state that ideally the civil parish should be the catch-all article, avoiding single line articles on every village and landmark within the parish.
Therefore, I suggest that villages within the parish with a one or two sentence article, ie Heath Common & Rock, West Sussex  to be merged and redirected to this parish article. ++ MortimerCat (talk) 16:55, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 
Talk:Rowley's Hill

message: This page refers to the NE top as 'St Margaret's Mount' however the Gregory Wale article claims it was called '"Margot's Mount" and in later years this was corrupted to "Maggot's Mount"' and cites a reference which actually refers to all three versions. I don't have local knowledge however and the Ordnance Survey have nothing to say on the matter. Paulatthehug (talk) 23:35, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Nutbourne, Horsham

message: In response to the IP who made the recent additions: The merge tag was added during a purge on single line geographic articles, most of which would never expand to more than a couple of lines. In the case of this article, you have shown that there is more that can be added, so feel free to remove the merge tag. (The article does need tidying up and sources added though). MortimerCat (talk) 23:46, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge tag
Talk:Nuthurst

message: Guidelines at Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements state that ideally the civil parish should be the catch-all article, avoiding single line articles on every village and landmark within the parish.
Therefore, I suggest that villages within the parish with a one or two sentence article, ie Copsale, Maplehurst, West Sussex & Sedgwick, West Sussex to be merged and redirected to this parish article. ++ MortimerCat (talk) 11:56, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 
Talk:Parham, West Sussex

message: Guidelines at Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements state that ideally the civil parish should be the catch-all article, avoiding single line articles on every village and landmark within the parish.
Therefore, I suggest that villages within the parish with a one or two sentence article, ie Rackham, West Sussex to be merged and redirected to this parish article. ++ MortimerCat (talk) 22:52, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 
Talk:North Horsham

message: Guidelines at Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements state that ideally the civil parish should be the catch-all article, avoiding single line articles on every village and landmark within the parish.
Therefore, I suggest that villages within the parish with a one or two sentence article, ie Littlehaven, West Sussex & Roffey to be merged and redirected to this parish article. ++ MortimerCat (talk) 22:40, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Since these are now effectively neighbourhoods of Horsham, I intend to add a mention of each in the main Horsham article, and would suggest a redirect to the Horsham#Suburbs section rather than to this parish article. Tafkam (talk) 11:28, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Of course, that doesn't stop further information being added about them here in addition. Tafkam (talk) 12:26, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 
Talk:Rudgwick

message: Guidelines at Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements state that ideally the civil parish should be the catch-all article, avoiding single line articles on every village and landmark within the parish.
Therefore, I suggest that villages within the parish with a one or two sentence article, ie Tisman's Common to be merged and redirected to this parish article. ++ MortimerCat (talk) 20:49, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: I have added an image of Rudgwick School football team 1948, but I am not sure whether Rudgwick School had become Rudgwick Primary School at that point. As of March 2021, there is apparently no free and recent image of the primary school available. Therefore I have not removed the reqphoto template. Storye book (talk) 20:30, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Image
Talk:Rusper

message: Is anyone able to say why the pubs in Rusper were named the Plough and the Star?  Wanderer57 (talk) 23:01, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pub names and the Abbey 

message: Guidelines at Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements state that ideally the civil parish should be the catch-all article, avoiding single line articles on every village and landmark within the parish.
Therefore, I suggest that villages within the parish with a one or two sentence article, ie Lambs Green  to be merged and redirected to this parish article. ++ MortimerCat (talk) 22:08, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: News! The population of Rusper in the census of 2011 was 1,635. Looking up total populations for individual parishes is always a bit of a challenge, but now that this bit of work for Rusper has been completed, perhaps you would like to update the page accordingly.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oldontarian (talk • contribs) 11:23, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population
Talk:The Missing Shade of Blue

message: I am surprised that this has been marked for speedy deletion for being a very short article. It doesn't seem that short to me.
Philosophyclass HSOG (talk) 23:36, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Article needs work, but could have potential. Mjroots (talk) 23:56, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Though, it appears a lot of it is based on personal research. Nwwaew (Talk Page) (Contribs) (E-mail me) 00:07, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm wouldn't want to claim much originality here. All I have tried to do is to pull together the various comments made by other commentators on a topic that all students of Hume will have come across but for which there seems to be no easily accessible online article.Philosophyclass HSOG (talk) 00:28, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Oblate spheroidal coordinates

message: Hey PAR, 
I went to the library and dug up a few books that had stuff about these coordinates.  Morse and Feshbach have really pretty stereo images, have you seen them?  Basically, they use your definitions
:
x = a \cos \phi \sqrt{\left( \xi^{2} + 1 \right)\left( 1 - \eta^{2}\right)}
:
y = a \sin \phi \sqrt{\left( \xi^{2} + 1 \right)\left( 1 - \eta^{2}\right)}
:
z = a \xi \eta
where ξ = sinh μ and η = sin ν.  They express it slightly differently, though, using (ξ1, ξ2, ξ3) defined as 
:
\xi_{1} \equiv = a \xi, \xi_{2} \equiv \eta, \xi_{3} = \cos \phi
I found the same definitions in the Handbook of Integration by Daniel Zwillinger, except using (u1, u2, u3).  It seems that most people use the colatitude θ instead of the latitude ν; I don't know how I got the impression that the latitude was more commonly used?  Do you think we should switch from ν to θ?  I rather like your 2D plot and would be sorry to see it go.  Willow (talk) 19:25, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Different conventions

message: I think the sum giving V=sigma(n=0 to infinity)sigma(m=0 to infinity) could be replaced by V=sigma(n=0 to infinity)sigma(m=0 to n).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tournesol007 (talk • contribs) 20:01, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: =========

message: The expressions of Laplacian seems to be wrong in this article, i.e. not compatible with the expression derived from the article "Orthogonal Coordinates" which seems correct upon setting the metric factors appropriately. The wrong feature is in the latitudinal coordinate component, which should contain a factor inside the first derivative operator (the factor has been put out the derivative as if it did not depend on the coordinate).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by PBenard (talk • contribs) 20:11, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong expressions of Laplacian 

message: I added a "+" sign in the Laplacian's last term between the squared hyperbloic cosine and the squared cosine.  This was an error in addition to the possible error mentioned above.Smokey Martini 19:43, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: =======================================
Talk:Windfall tax (United Kingdom)

message: I've reverted some recent edits by 212.249.49.62. While I accept it may read a bit pro-Labour at the moment, the edits now make it read like a Tory press release and contain both POV statements (about efficiency created by privatisation) and references to a 1980s tax on banks without any references to back them up. Saluton (talk) 11:56, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert 
Talk:Bahr el Ghazal River

message: The fact box says average discharge is 48 m³/s, while in the Hydrology section it is said to vary between nothing and 48 m³/s, Which one is correct? I don't have access to the cited source for the latter, and the former is without reference. –LPfi (talk) 19:28, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discharge 