lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Aunt Bee

message: I believe the correct spelling is "Aunt Bea", short for "Beatrice". Maurreen 15:06, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is short for Beatrice, but the correct spelling is "Bee."  See:    .  Wavy G 
21:38, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

text: FWIW, the earliest reference I can find to The Andy Griffith Show's Aunt Bee is from 4 September 1960:  Calebrw (talk) 00:55, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

text: I agree. I just saw an episode where they call her Beatrice as she pretends to be a high-class maid. I’ve been trying to correct this and keep it corrected as I believe it is the truth. 2601:403:4281:2572:50DF:7BA8:EB68:9D2D (talk) 02:08, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling

message: Several entries erroniously state that AFTER Andy and Helen left Mayberry, the series became "Mayberry RFD". WRONG! All one need to do is watch some of the RFD shows (or check other internet sourses) to know that Sheriff Taylor and Helen where married on RFD and stayed on through several episodes, into season two.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.40.172.8 (talk • contribs) 
::This is surely a debatable point.   In "Andy and Helen Get Married", the pilot for/first episode of RFD, Andy does indeed leave Mayberry for Raleigh. It is the very act of their departure that creates Mayberry RFD.   I don't think it's erroneous at all to say that after Andy and Helen left, the series becomes RFD.  And it's a stretch to say they "stayed on" for a few episodes.  That, to me, implies that they were involved in the first few consecutive episodes, which is certainly not the case. Helen only appeared in the season 1 and 2 openers, and Andy was only in three more episodes beyond these, none of which were consecutive. They were, just as Don Knotts had been in the last three seasons of TAGS, very occasional, sporadic guests.  CzechOut  ☎ | ✍ 05:39, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Andy Leaving Mayberry

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. — SamX [talk · contribs] 15:22, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:Inertial fusion energy

message: This article, like magnetic fusion energy, essentially consists of a single sentance that is covered in inertial confinement fusion. I suggest a merge? Maury 15:09, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually there's nothing to merge. Everything here is already covered in the rather well written section that's already there! This is becoming a redir...  Maury 17:57, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do we really need this article?
Talk:Danish Superliga

message: What makes a player a "notable player"? 
Personally, I don't see Adrian Cann as being notable (therefore, removed), but there are other players who aren't noted --85.82.249.149 (talk) 22:14, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable foreign players

message: Is there a reason for Esbjerg & Randers having "n/a" as their first season? Esbjerg won a championship in 1961 and a graph on their article shows the team was even earlier in the top flight. And Randers FC article has a table which says they made a one-year visit to Superliga in 2004-2005. 85.217.20.178 (talk) 22:16, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Esbjerg & Randers 
Talk:Dominique-France Loeb-Picard

message: Shouldn't this article be renamed: Fadila of Egypt. I would do it myself, but I don't know how.
212.116.219.43 19:47, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The style from 1999 is different in the text and in the list of styles since birth... --181.164.100.110 (talk) 14:43, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Style incoherence 

message: "The marriage ended in divorce in 1996 ... The marriage was dissolved in 2008"
What does this mean? What can it mean? Harfarhs (talk) 09:00, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marriage and divorce
Talk:Atlantic, Suwannee River and Gulf Railway

message: It has no sources, yet it claims it enjoyed total dominance for the time it existed? Seems to be fake to me. Kirbanzo (talk) 14:42, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: found a source from 1893. This is the sort of subject you could spend weeks digging through old newspapers to find sourcing. I probably read about it in  annals of florida history or some such, years ago, so I recognized the name.-- Dlohcierekim  (talk) 14:55, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

text: The article was created in 2004 by a user from days of yore, when we were less systematic about sourcing.-- Dlohcierekim  (talk) 15:00, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rationale for hoax CSD 

message: You know, this old ICC valuations list has additional info on this and other Florida Railroads]]. It also has a reflink. ---------User:DanTD (talk)  18:37, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old ICC sandboxes 

message: I have added some information from a source I have. I left in some unsourced material because it sounds like it came from the charter, and is potentially sourceable. ` Donald Albury 10:23, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: And done. - Donald Albury 12:14, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  New information 

message: How was the above related? FloridaArmy (talk) 01:11, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I cannot find that one in the sources I have. This book, page 17, shows some legal activity with the state in 1912-1913. I see that there are old stock certificates for sale, but many railroads that issued stock never completed construction of a line. - Donald Albury 01:54, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Atlantic Okeechobee, & Gulf Railway
Talk:Princess Marie-Louise of Bulgaria

message: The article "Princess Marie Louise of Bulgaria" is the original article regarding the daughter of Tsar Boris III and Tsaritsa Ioanna. This article is a copy and it adds to the other one. This article should be deleted and the other article should be left as the primary.
:I have deleted the biography project banner from this page accordingly.  — AnnaKucsma  Speak! 16:37, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Florida, Georgia and Western Railway

message: What's FOO and FOOO? RJFJR 16:55, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm wondering the same thing ---------User:DanTD (talk)  15:54, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Judging by the first edit, it looks like it's a placeholder. Wikipedia uses foo as a placeholder for a lot of examples. (See foobar.) Here's a link to the law as well. – TheGridExe (talk)  17:38, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Pity the...
Talk:Mandapeta

message: Non Governmental Organisation (NGO) Smiley Children Society founded in 2007 in mandapeta Prudhvimoses (talk) 17:51, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Smiley Children Society
Talk:Bharathiar University

message: * Official Website of Nanoscience and Technology, Bharathiar University
* Official Website of Academic Staff College, Bharathiar University
* Official Website of School of Commerce, Bharathiar University
All the above mentioned links are official website of different departments of the university. As per Wikipedia:EL Wikipedia articles about any organization, person, website, or other entity should link to the subject's official site, if any. So the addition of above links in the external links is justified
: First, you are misusing the above guideline. If you read it carefully it says "Wikipedia articles about X should link to the subject official site" (my emphasis). So only a link to the subject's website is allowed, and the subject of the article is the university, not the departments. In addition, per WP:ELOFFICIAL "More than one official link should be provided only when the additional links provide the reader with unique content and are not prominently linked from other official websites." These are all very prominently linked at the website of the university. --Muhandes (talk) 12:27, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Your explanation seems reasonable.Balaji (talk) 09:04, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links
Talk:Luisa Moreno

message: The article states that she was named "Blanca Rosa López Rodríguez" at birth, married Angel De León, and later married Gray Bemis.  So how does she come to be known as "Luisa Moreno"?  Did she change her legal name?  Or was it a "nom de guerre"?  And what significance did the name have for her? Steve Wise (talk) 18:59, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:Glossary of chess problems

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot 09:08, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I would have thought that this was already more than a dictionary definition. If the content can find a home on Wiktionary as well, then fair enough, but I don't see why it should be removed from the Wikipedia; quite a few articles here refer to it, and I would think that it's a useful read for people new to problems and confused by all the jargon. --Camembert 14:50, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

text: I agree.  I have added a level-2 index here for better referencing and already adjusted a couple of other pages for that usage.  --Wfaxon 21:42, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

text: All right, I just wanted to support this page to stay in Wikipedia as it contains quite substantial amount of explanations going beyond dictionary definitions. Indeed, I intended to write new separate pages on some subjects included here, but was amazed by very compact presentation of some topics containing everything important in very few words. Nevertheless, if time allows, I would write something... --Ruziklan 19:22, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-02-1 Automated pywikipediabot message 

message: Why isn't this article organized like Glossary of chess is organized? (Benefit: then specific terms in articles could be wlink'd, as is often done for terms in the chess glossary found in articles.) Don't know what it would take to reorg this reference article to match the chess glossary structure; in the meantime, does anyone object if it is reorg'd to match? Ihardlythinkso (talk) 20:27, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: And now updated to use  templates, which are semantically rich, and also grant anchor tags to each term. HTH. -- Quiddity (talk) 09:45, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article org 

message: For improved readability, does anyone object if I de-italicize intra-glossary term links (when said terms are simply part of text in sentences, and not specially emphasized as words/terms, e.g. "See also term_name.")? --IHTS (talk) 01:10, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Excess italic 

message: Battery definition is incomplete, complete definition is in the article. 82.144.242.98 (talk) 09:39, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Battery
Talk:Orkhon River

message: I am uncomfortable with the spelling  Khara Balgassoun and would prefer Kara-Balgassun or Qara-Balgassun.  The present spelling looks very much like a French rendering. Doc Rock 15:13, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: in Old Turkic. Böri (talk) 10:14, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orqun / Orkun River
Talk:Shane Kimbrough

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Consensus to move page to Shane Kimbrough. (non-admin closure)  — YoungForever(talk)  15:22, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Robert S. Kimbrough →  – By WP:COMMONNAME - he is Shane Kimbrough on his own Twitter and Instagram; NASA has him as R. Shane Kimbrough which would be a possible alternative. The target Shane Kimbrough has history, plus the page was previously moved in October 2008 with the comment "Moving to proper naming - NASA's site (biography) has his name as Robert S. Kimbrough. His name is Robert, not Shane. Title should reflect proper name per MOS naming convensions" which is certainly not correct now. Keith the Koala (talk) 09:25, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 4 August 2020 
Talk:R. C. Mehta

message: I have attempted a cleanup of the article, removing some extraneous or uncited information as well as some of the "distinguished" talk and general praise. I think the new version is more concise and clean. I would welcome more opinions tho. Cheers, Jonathan R. (WikiCorvee (talk) 16:41, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite
Talk:Rajai Davis

message: I am not sure if I should add this, but do you guys think Rajai was one of the great "steals" from the 2007 trade deadline?? I mean look what he has done for this slow productive Giants team. he is a fan favorite, a youngster too and he might have an excellent future. So what do you guys think?? Derrty2033 05:11, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: While I might agree with you, I think if you just put it in like this it is POV, and therefore NG for Wikipedia articles.  If you cite to someone else saying it it is OK.  Or if you just put in facts -- like a cite to him being a fan favorite, etc, that is OK.  --Epeefleche 06:26, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trade Deadline 

message: *A's claim OF Rajai DavisUser:calbear22 (talk) 06:43, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Useful source
Talk:Green Lake (Wisconsin)

message: I've taken the liberty of making a page move to the more formal name of the lake.  I can't find any official reference to anything except Green Lake in the links, so this seems to make more sense to me.  In any case, I'm happy to admit being wrong, but this seems to be most appropriate at the moment.  Cheers, PaddyM 21:48, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page Move 

message: Nothing has a "Native American name"; different Native American languages use different terms for the same place (and sometimes multiple terms in a single language, just like "Green Lake" vs. "Big Green Lake". It would be helpful to know which language "Day Cho Lah" is/was in, and also its definition/etymology if known. Judging from this map it looks to me like Hochunk (Winnebago) is most likely, if "Day Cho Lah" was the local name. But it would be well to find specific documentation. --Haruo (talk) 15:53, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Day Cho Lah 

message: Hello, a group from the UW Milwaukee Limnology class will be adding a lot of new information to the page in the next few weeks. Existing information will likely be incorporated into the changes. The page is being drafted here User:Recipe4dsastr/Green Lake, Green Lake County Wideshpan6 (talk) 18:48, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  UW Milwaukee Limnology
Talk:Sé

message: Please help to edit this in:
< http://spanish.about.com/od/pronouns/a/introduction_se.htm >:
---------------------------------------------
Se shouldn't be confused with sé (note the accent mark), which is usually the singular first-person present indicative form of saber ("to know"). Thus sé usually means "I know." Sé can also be the singular familiar imperative form of ser; in that case it means "you be."
---------------------------------------------
< http://spanish.about.com/library/weekly/aa041700b.htm >:
---------------------------------------------
no sé can be translated as "Well, I don't know." 
---------------------------------------------
< http://spanish.about.com/library/weekly/aa041700a.htm >.
Hopiakuta 15:17, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Rakeysh Omprakash Mehra

message: The film "Delhi-6" is described as "critically acclaimed" when, in fact, it received mixed to poor reviews.  I'm going to change the phrasing of the article if no one else does. Rabble Rouser (talk) 18:00, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: "Critically acclaimed"

message: Template:Did you know nominations/Rakeysh Omprakash Mehra --Tinpisa (talk) 17:07, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: DYK nomination
Talk:Mats Gustafsson

message: If you are reading this and can make a family connection between this artist and jazz guitarist Rune Gustafsson, please feel free to contact me with such information. Better yet, include it in the article directly, and provide the source of such information. --Cheers, Folajimi (leave a note) 15:19, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ralston Bowles

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :S/b/:Ralston Bowles and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 10#S/b/:Ralston Bowles until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.   -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 01:18, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "S/b/:Ralston Bowles" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Capital Area Multimodal Gateway

message: Can someone that knows how to rename article officially rename this one Capital Area Multi Modal Gateway?  The Capital Area Multi Modal Gateway officially opens, today.  The old station is scheduled for demolition to create the parking lot for the new Capital Area Multi Modal Gateway.  Thanks.  I'll working on updating the article changing tenses and such. --Criticalthinker (talk) 11:44, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I just got through figuring out how to do this by myself and changing (including the additiona of a new "description" section) the article accordingly to reflect both the previous station on site and the new one before someone edited in the middle of my edit. --Criticalthinker (talk) 14:59, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: As I said on my talk page, apologies for the edit conflict. It really sucks to lose a bunch of work. But as for the titles, "Multimodal" is much more common in the sources than "Multi Modal", with nearly 5,000 Google News hits compared to 3.--Cúchullain t/c 15:07, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: It just happened again, though I've copied and pasted my answer this time in case something like this happened. Someone else is currently editing the page.  I want people to hold off and let me do this.  My edits have more citations and is better arranged.  If someone want to tweek them, that's fine, but please stop the editiing for the moment, folks. --Criticalthinker (talk) 16:10, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: It's the nature of a collaborative project, I'm afraid. Your move made the station pop up on watchlists. At any rate,  seems to have stopped editing; I'm sure we're all happy to let you take a crack at it to avoid future edit conflicts. Let us know if you need anything else.--Cúchullain t/c 16:17, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename 
Talk:Ramón Malla Call

message: Ramon Malla Call didn't serve as bishop of Urgell, but just as an Apostolic Administrator during the vacancy of the see of Urgell. Gugganij (talk) 12:10, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  He was not bishop of Urgell 
Talk:Brickell City Centre station

message: This will likely open with a new name:  http://therealdeal.com/miami/blog/2015/10/14/swire-to-pay-miami-dade-county-for-metromover-invasion/   ".. the Brickell City Centre Metromover station."
 It is disingenuous to suggest that the station is open when in fact it has been out of operation for more than a year while an extensive rebuilding took place, regardless of technical convention. B137 (talk) 16:01, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: That Infobox parameter is for permanent closure. You have shown it better as "rebuilt". Thanks. Secondarywaltz (talk) 16:23, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Makeover, closure
Talk:Randall James Bayer

message: The journal list is not necessary - it is available externally (and a link provided) and they are not normally included in academic biography articles as they are simply too long.--Peta 01:56, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This article, submitted for AfD is not currently about what is "necessary", but rather what is "required" to pass notability guidelines.  Without the complete list of publications the claim was made that he was not notable, but typical.  Therefore the complete list is absolutely necessary until such time as the AfD is closed. Unless you have a way to magically teach all voters to read every cited link.Wjhonson 04:16, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That is rubbish, the afd is not going to fail - the article will be kept. If anything including the giant list of articles makes this article look like a vainity article. Book chapers should make it obvious that this guy is well recognised in his field wihout the list of 100+ papers. --Peta 04:18, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Your position is not well-attested in the voting history.  The link has been there since prior to the posting and *yet* people were still claiming he was not notable.  As an admin, why don't you close the Afd?  After that, I would have no problem with you removing the list of articles. Wjhonson 04:24, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The only reason people are voting for deletion is because the subject submitted it, which is in part why I removed the list of pubs - although they weren't added by the author, make the article look like a CV, which could be detrimental to the afd. I can't just remove it from afd, since once the process has started it has to run the 7 days.--Peta 04:28, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think your suggestion that people might vote *against* because he has too *many* publications posted makes no sense.  On the other hand you could be patient a few more days and let the AfD conclude. Wjhonson 04:34, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

text: No the voter mentality makes no sense. If someone wants to reproduce their CV, which is what the list looks like - then they should get a webpage. Thus people will vote to delete because the page look likes vainity. A wikipedia article should look like a wikipedia article and it is not customary to include large publications lists in scientist articles.--Peta 04:41, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: However that is not what the list actually is.  As you should well know. And the page has several editors, so obviously is not *vanity*.  And I don't see anything stating what is customary except perhaps in your opinion. Wjhonson 04:46, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If it were customary to include a list of publications, you would see it in other articles. If you are putting them here for the AfD discussion, and then removing the after, then that is misleading. There are links to external sites on the AfD discussion, and therefore this is not neccesary. I also agree with Peta, it makes the article look much more like vanity than if the papers were not there. --liquidGhoul 11:45, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Publications list
Talk:Financial District station

message: July 2019 ridership dropped dramatically to the point where something such as a partial shut down must have happened. Or a full shutdown for most of the month. 
*Financial District (2) 282 1,203 -921 -76.5% July 2019 ridership technical report
B137 (talk) 14:53, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  July 2019 ridership plunge