Talk:Think break

message: The yeah comes first, then the woo. Clearly heard in the sample.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.253.186.82 (talk) 14:15, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: It's "Yeah! Woo!"

message: Would it make sense to change the title to "Yeah! Woo!" by switching the order of the words? Because if you listen to the beat from the start, "yeah!" comes out first. But if you suddenly listen from the middle, it could feel like "woo!" was first. UD34 (talk) 05:01, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Switched it back per https://books.google.com/books?id=kYrHBwAAQBAJ&pg=PT38 czar 18:26, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: There seems to be a misunderstanding because both "Think (about it)" and "It Takes Two" which are most closely associated with this article start with "Yeah." Even "Go On Girl" which the book mentions starts with "Yeah." You can easily find the official recordings of these songs on YouTube.UD34 (talk) 09:30, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

text: Both the source material and the sample that is popular start with "Yeah" then "Woo." Listen to the audio that is on the article page. Also search both songs on YouTube and check. UD34 (talk) 06:02, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Article title

message: That's what it sounds like to me. I can't hear "Wooo! Yeah!" or "Yeah! Wooo!" in this. 66.25.177.117 (talk) 21:09, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wooo! Cut! 

message: A complete listing of every song to sample "Think (About It)" would list over 2,000 songs, if WhoSampled is any indication. It doesn't add anything to the article and seems more like a trivia section than anything else - notable examples of the break can be (and are) listed in the article itself. I've removed the list because of this. The main relevant article I can find on this is WP:PLOT. Jokullmusic 16:24, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The list is unnecessary and permanently incomplete 

message: This page was moved and retitled "Woo! Yeah!" a few years ago. Why? It's definitely "Yeah! Woo!" in the sample, in that order. Was this a sneaky sort of vandalism which has gone unnoticed?
:I wrote the original article at the current "Woo! Yeah!" title. It was moved without discussion several years ago, then moved back to the original title. The sample, not the source, is most commonly used in Woo! Yeah! order. SchmuckyTheCat (talk) 01:23, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism? 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved to "Think break."   Calidum 18:38, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Woo! Yeah! →  – "Woo! Yeah!" feels non-descriptive, when amongst producers and writing it's pretty much referred to as the Think Break. ⠀TOMÁSTOMÁSTOMÁS⠀TALK⠀ 19:25, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

text: Comment. It seems like this should be Think break (capital T lowercase b) in the text and in the title if it's moved, or even "Think" break as found here. It is a break named after the song "Think" so should be formatted per MOS:POPMUSIC (I think? Not sure what the policy is for that with titles). The other source switches between capital b and lowercase b but mostly uses the lowercase form. --Cerebral726 (talk) 16:12, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 8 March 2022