lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Bánh xèo

message: I just heard that some kind of rare leaf is essential in the preparation of this dish, but I forgot which kind of leaf. Does anyone know what it is? Badagnani (talk) 02:56, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Leaf

message: The description of this food sounds just like American egg fu yung. Does anyone know the historical connection? Collin237  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.203.26.174 (talk) 14:22, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Egg fu yung? 

message: Related dishes found in Vietnamese, Thai and Cambodian cuisines with the same basic ingredients (rice flour, coconut milk/cream and turmeric), therefore I propose to merge them into one article with an English name. I don't know how optional coconut milk/cream is all of them, so the name could also be "rice [flour] crepes". –Turaids (talk) 14:10, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Since khanom bueang Yuan literally means "Vietnamese khanom bueang", I think we can treat the Vietnamese term as primary if a merger is agreed on (no opinion on that). --Paul_012 (talk) 16:30, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

text: This user tried to remove any non-Khmer names of Vietnamese and Thai dishes into English names that aten't even primarily used. And then creates his own Khmer food articles on wikipedia that did not originate from Cambodia nor are primatily known from Cambodia. We all see your sneaky attempts at redirecting pages and articles on wikipedia. You need to be checked on. 49.190.249.131 (talk) 03:06, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Bánh xèo]] and [[Khanom bueang Yuan]] into [[Coconut-rice crepes]]
Talk:Milt Stegall

message: Time to give Milt Stegall the proper accolades he deserves with a true page to show his greatness. AMac2002 23:14, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: You got to be kidding me that there isnt an image of the best receiver to ever play football.Bozgoalie (talk) 04:48, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: On the bio to the right it only shows his NFL stats. If anything they should be replaced with the CFL stats since he is the leading WR in CFL history. It is a glaring omission and quite frankly devalues the page.
--24.36.110.176 (talk) 22:07, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  CFL vs NFL 
Talk:Redline (disambiguation)

message: I think we need a little discussion on what to do with this dis-ambiguation page (which is a list of meanings of "Redline" as a single word) and Red Line (which is a list of lines colored red on subway systems.) Any opinions?? Georgia guy 23:20, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe all "Redline", "Red Line", and "Red-line" searches should funnel into one DAB page ("Red line" seems appropriate).  This would obviously make for a larger DAB page, but follows my interpretation of WP:DPAGES to serve as an "all-inclusive" disambiguation. Hoof Hearted (talk) 17:59, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Broken english

message: The redirect command in this article inappropriately redirects searchers away from the term "Broken English" (ie. music by Marianne Faithfull)
:And what does Tok Pisin have to do with broken english anyway? - SigmaEpsilon → ΣΕ 15:50, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inappropriate redirect of the term broken english.
Talk:Edison (film)

message: I'm moving it back. Since this movie was released internationally under that title, compared to "Edison Force," which was the US title for its quiet DVD release. IMDB also still lists it as Edison, and, I'm pretty sure wikipedia's policy is to title articles with their original English release title, despite what it's called within the United States. (See Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone and Fahrenheit (video game) for just two of many examples.)
Oh yeah, don't watch this movie. It's awful.--- Rogsheng 05:51, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I thought it was pretty good! → JARED (t)  21:18, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Moving back to "Edison (film)"
Talk:Walter Tewksbury

message: Ah, the error is perpetuated. Unfortunately, I am lacking enough documentation to correct it at this time.
The man whom this article is about was not named John Tewksbury. His true name was Walter B. Tewksbury. "John" was never part of his name. If you check the official Olympic records, he is listed as Walter.
However, this was not always so, and thus the cause of the error.
In 1900, the Olympic Games were much different than today. Athletes had to arrange their own transportation to the games. In order to pay for his passage, Walter Tewksbury borrowed the mony from his uncle John. In exchange, Walter agreed to use John's name in case he won anything.
Anyway, so goes the story his daughter told me. But I can't find it in print anywhere — yet.
In any event, the historical marker at the Tunkhannock Area High School track says "Walter B. Tewksbury," and all of the exhibits at the county museum also use that name.
— Michael J 23:25, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: (Discussion moved from the Help Desk.) The listings on the International Olympic Committee database, the U.S.A. Track & Field Hall of Fame and the Pennsylvania Historical & Museum Commission all have him listed as "Walter." Therefore, I believe that constitutes both common usage as well as accuracy. (Thank you, Moonriddengirl, for making the move.) —  Michael J  18:31, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Real name
Talk:The Hunting of the President

message: The final paragraph, particularly this statement "She told the independent counsel the Clinton's did nothing wrong, and the independent counsel said they had statements prepared and she simply had to agree with the pre-written claims." leaves a lot of questions unanswered. First off, the statement implies she (Susan McDougal) committed perjury by signing a sworn statement she knew to be false. I have read other accounts how Ken Starr's team was quite aggressive at getting cooperation out of people reluctant to testify. However, again as written, this statement, and indeed the entire paragraph, don't make sense. Can someone who has read the book/seen the movie expand this summary to not leave these unanswered questions? Dave (talk) 04:19, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can someone who has read the book/seen the movie clarify this? 

message: The 2003 documentary, and the 2004 remake/update The Hunting of the President Redux -? ELSchissel (talk) 00:40, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  This seems to confuse two films?
Talk:Larkin Kerwin

message: He was armigerous; maybe someone could find an image of his arms, or the blazon, and post.  --Daniel C. Boyer 21:45, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Arms
Talk:Too Darn Hot

message: In Ella Fitzgerald's recording on the album Sings the Cole Porter Songbook, Ella sings the following lyrics for the bridge:
: 'Cording to the Kinsey report
:Every average man you know
:Much prefers his lovey dovey to court
:When the temperature is low.
:But when the thermometer goes way up
:And the weather is sizzling hot
:Mr. pants for romance is not
:Cause it's too, too, too darn hot
:It's too darn hot
:It's too, too darn hot
Second time:
:According to the Kinsey report
:Every average man you know
:Much prefers his lovey dovey to court
:When the temperature is low.
:But when the thermometer goes way up
:And the weather is sizzling hot
:Mr. God, for his squad
:A marine for his queen
:A GI for his cutey pie is not
:Cause it's too, too, too darn hot
:It's too darn hot
:It's too darn hot
Does anyone know when these lyrics were added/replaced?  For now, won't mention any specifics.
68.43.45.250 23:30, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:College tuition in the United States

message: adding a column of the current political views on the topic  Marenaolger (talk) 19:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  politics  

message: — Assignment last updated by Nickkane19 (talk) 16:05, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: English 1101 033
Talk:Harrah's Resort Southern California

message: Please do not write slander about the hotel. Wikipedia is not a slander board. We focus on history, not opinions. -Ben 23:30, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I hope you heed your own advice because most of your contributions sound like commercials for casinos and the fact that you work for Harrah's (Rio) doesn't make you as an impartial source. Listen, my contributions were POV, but there is a difference between POV and slander. In my opinion, slander is anything that's hostile to something you like. When I visited the casino, I found the service to be subpar and the staff there to be downright hostile and rude to me and my associates, unlike at Pechanga, Morongo or even Harrah's Vegas. Harrah's Rincon and the idiots who work there can go take a hik
e and you should go join them. --Tellmenow 01:02, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Slander

message: Can someone delete the article of Harrah's Rincon please because that article has few words not like the other casino's in California that has more articles like Pala Casino Resort and Spa, Barona Casino, Pechanga Resort and Casino, Morongo Casino, Resort & Spa and more... thats why the Harrah's Rincon article should be 100% deleted. 75.141.100.115 (talk) 00:23, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree the article maybe shouldn't be here. The length of the article isn't an issue - short and sweet is sometimes good! Unfortunately it is mainly unsourced, unverifiable and has no proof of notability. I've flagged it for attention. Sionk (talk) 13:12, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I, for one, appreciate the existence of this article.  I needed to find the year this casino was opened and this was the only information source I could find.  The larger Harrah's article does not give this info.64.183.77.226 (talk) 22:59, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Deleting the Harrah's Rincon Article
Talk:Bopha!

message: I just watched the DVD and was impressed.  I added what I could - I hope others will add more.  Things like the actual language / ethnicity - I have a feeling it was Zulu, but I might be wrong.  I also don't think the year or location are specified, but again someone else might know better.  --GwydionM 18:42, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding details 

message: Does this article talk page need more WikiProject templates? I feel like it does, but I leave it to someone else to actually add something more.--Dthomsen8 (talk) 02:02, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  More WikiProject templates?
Talk:William Walker (diver)

message: I just watched the episode on this subject from Cathedral (tv series) and I think the original author is a bit confused about what Walker did under the church. The series describes that the church sits on a bed of waterlogged peat which in turn sits on a bed of gravel. The peat is semipermeable to water, but the water flows freely through the gravel. In the gravel layer there is also substantial sediment which is apparently critical not to be removed.
They first tried pumping so as to remove the peat and replace it with cement, but found that they were removing too much sediment so they had to stop. Then they sent Walker down to do two things: remove the peat, and replace it with cement, both while underwater.
Once Walker did that, they could safely pump out the water without any fear of sediment removal because the cement effectively capped the gravel layer with watertight layer of cement. -- Sbwoodside 23:54, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Television

message: I am a relative of William Walker and have deleted reference to his wife dying in 1819 as she lived well after this. I will be updating this file with details of his other work. Terry Anne Hainsworth (talk) 19:17, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Please, do. I am looking forward to any interesting information about William Walker. However, Wikipedia does not allow any original research, so it would be good, if you could also cite some sources. Thanks. Jan.Kamenicek (talk) 20:53, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  William Walker Wife 

message: Sometimes in these articles there's a list of work inspired by, or about, the subject of the article.
I wonder whether people might not know, and be interested to know, that a song was written about the "Winchester Diver".  It's on "The Underfall Yard" album by Big Big Train.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.32.138.217 (talk) 17:38, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  In popular culture
Talk:ARIA Music Awards of 2004

message: What exactly needs cleaning up here?  It appears formatted correctly, has plenty of links, and includes all relevant information. -- Chuq 23:55, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup
Talk:Memphis Belle: A Story of a Flying Fortress

message: What's the sense of the link from “ostensibly” to its Wiktionary article? Why not linking every word that might offer the least difficulty, then? Goochelaar (talk) 19:28, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to wiktionary
Talk:Coconstitutionalism

message: I don't really understand this sentence, but it looks like conjecture in any event: 
Unlike Spain, the UK government remains legally competent to revoke devolution, to do so would probably result in the violent destruction of the state.
That's false. I'm Spanish and every autonomy can be revoked.
Article 155 of Spanish Constitution gives central government and Senate the ability to revoke the power of an autonomous comunity.
:I updated the article and removed the NPOV tag, please use  or  for sentences, then detail issues here. - RoyBoy 23:14, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV
Talk:Camp White Pine

message: These are crafts, I'm sure, but perhaps someone could elaborate. Kelisi 00:03, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "glass, copper" 

message: It seems quite odd to me that so much space is dedicated to directions...is this truly necessary? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.102.249.243 (talk) 19:49, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Directions" 

message: I'm quite sure that the artist who made the map  did not give consent to post it here.  Although User:Alebowgm made note that it "is not copyrighted", I believe it is. -- 99.230.226.195 17:21, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Map" 

message: please find wp:reliable sources that show this camp meets notability requirements--Work permit (talk) 03:38, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: +1 for delete. No other Ontario camps like this are listed on Wikipedia. 173.33.193.62 (talk) 07:24, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Keep. It's the camp in Meatballs, the prototypical camp movie, and, unfortunately, about as close as we seem to get to a "classic Canadian film". It's more fun than Goin' Down the Road or Mon oncle Antoine. Varlaam (talk) 19:30, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: Is or was the camp explicitly Jewish? That is what I believe I was told a quarter of a century ago. Varlaam (talk) 19:32, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jewish? 

message: I have added tags, there are several issues with the page. Notability, Unreferenced, and only has External links. Kyle1278 01:58, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Tags
Talk:Legislative Assembly of Alberta

message: I'm just wondering, but how is 39 seats a majority in a Legislature of 83?!  Wouldn't the majority be 42? Grizzwald 00:04, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The government caucus currently has 39 more members than the opposition, so the government's majority is currently 39. There's probably a better way to word it in the article, but I can't think of something that's both clearer and concise.  Feel free to fix it if you want. 15:12, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm just going to remove the Government Majority portion of the table altogether because I really find it ambiguous and confusing.  If you disagree feel free to put it back, but at least say why please. ;) Grizzwald 23:57, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: House Majority

message: I'm updating this page to reflect the new ministers that have been sworn in and David Hancock's ex-minister status, as according to this Edmonton Sun article here; http://www.edmontonsun.com/News/Alberta/2006/04/07/1524241-sun.html--198.161.102.118 03:08, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Ministers

message: This page needs to be updated.  198.166.20.237 (talk) 02:45, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Election 2008 

message: I'm just wondering why the colour of the PC's on this page, as well as all the other sessions of the Legislature of Alberta here on Wikipedia, have changed to a dark blue from a light blue?  I noticed in the edit history that Zippanova cited that it was to "standardize" the colours, but to what standard is it?  The PC's on the Legislative Assembly of Manitoba and Legislative Assembly of Ontario pages still use the light blue, not to mention that the colour used by the PC's of Alberta is a light blue, not a dark blue.  If this could just be clarified for me, that would be great.  Grizzwald (talk) 03:11, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Alberta PCs aren't associated with other PCs or Conservatives, this colour is more appropriate, because it is used on their website. 117Avenue (talk) 07:19, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  PC Party Colour Change 

message: Chris Nielsen links to the hockey player. Wilfred Day (talk)   — Preceding undated comment added 07:04, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  New MLAs 

message: According the the Legislative Assembly of Alberta website they have been officially dissolved and that there are "No Members of the Legislative Assembly until the results of the general election becomes official" so can I delete the list of all the MLAs and replace it with a TBD (To Be Determined) until the election results are official. YborCityJohn (talk) 03:12, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it is fine to list the members-elect, though we shouls be clear on their status.--Trystan (talk) 23:22, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assembly Dissolved 2023
Talk:Johnny Sack

message: Anyone know which spelling is correct?  HBO has both listed on their site.  I'm wondering if the "Sacrimoni" on the wedding invitations was a spelling mistake by the wedding planners? ♫ Bitch and Complain Sooner ♫ 00:11, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The press release and episode title used Sacrimoni too as far as I can tell--Opark 77 08:28, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sacrimoni or Sacramoni 

message: There's a debate over whether Sacramoni or Sacrimoni is the correct spelling so I propose that the article is moved to Johnny Sack, which is the nickname the character commonly is referred to as. Funkyvoltron 18:20, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Fuggetaboutit - he's Johnny Sack, always has been, always will be. Ronnotel 18:38, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: Spoilers everywhere  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tokoro14 (talk • contribs) 22:25, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Spoilers

message: The conflicting official sources of his last name are:
* It is spelled as Sacrimoni in the title of the episode "Mr. & Mrs. John Sacrimoni Request...." The title is written as such everywhere, on the official website, official book, the DVD menu & the DVD booklet.
* Also, the family's name is spelled as Sacrimoni on the actual wedding invitation shown in the episode.
* Spelled as Sacramoni on the character biography page on the official website.
* Sacramoni on the official book article "Jersey vs. New York."
I say the hierarchy of canon is that the name's appearance on the very series trumps its mention in the official supplements, such as website and book. "Mr. & Mrs. John Sacrimoni Request" actually seen on episode 6.05 > the official website bio page. Any other thoughts? --TheBearPaw (talk) 17:42, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  I suggest referring to his and his family's last name as Sacrimoni rather than Sacramoni in the articles
Talk:Chronic Future

message: Page seems to be written as advertisement with listing of songs that have once appeared on myspace page, along with the bio being taken directly from press release.  Article needs some work, will do best to get on if time permits.  RegainTheTruth 03:11, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems to me like one of the people from the band or related to it came in and wrote it. The opening part needs to be totally redone.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.226.125.194 (talk) 11:53, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertisment
Talk:Goldwater v. Carter

message: I think the quotes are mixed up - they're not consistent with the information in the sidebar.  Kevin Baastalk 00:21, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

message: I think the article should have a dedicated background section to better build context as to how it all led up to this supreme court case. Another area of expansion should be to include or at least mention more about Goldwater v. Carter when it was in the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia before it was sent to the US Supreme Court. 
I'd be willing to try and fill these in especially the court of appeals as I got my hands on copies from a collection in Arizona State. 
BrightAmbassador64 (talk) 06:17, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Background information and Court of Appeals
Talk:Boat Trip (film)

message: Does anybody know what cruise ship was used in this movie? -Etoile 18:41, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article references At the Movies (1986 TV program) with Ebert & Roeper, but it is difficult to find a reference to a tv show, or to even find the date of the episode and reference that. (You would think it would be one of the episodes from May 2003 but i Can't be sure.)
I was not able to find the specific episode where they first reviewed Boat Trip but I was able to find it on his Worst of 2003 list (IMDB episode page) where he ranked it number 3 out of the 10 worst films of the year (and Ebert repeats from his print review saying it was made for nobody, and about nothing). -- 109.78.197.202 (talk) 19:30, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ebert & Roeper
Talk:The Fighting Temptations

message: The Synopsis section was replaced on 06 August 2008 with a copy-and-paste from http://www.themoviespoiler.com/Spoilers/fightingtemptations.html, copyrighted material. I am restoring the text from the last clean version. • Gene93k (talk) 13:31, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Synopsis reverted due to copyvio 

message: Not sure whether I'm being pedantic but isn't it the critics' job to make sure a film isn't underrated? In any case, such a comment needs a citation, surely?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Charlietemps (talk • contribs) 09:46, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Underrated? 

message: The article formally declared the movie a minor success as the box office, worldwide. The problem with this is that as far as I known back in 2003 the theaters (at least in the U.S.) would have taken half the revenue from ticket sales. Factor in an unknown marketing budget and that could amount to more then $32 million when all is said and done. This would mean the film wouldn't even break even. If the $30 million film made $32 million in the states it would need to make $45 million before marketing and with a small $2 million marketing budget that would be $47 million. That would mean the film actually lost $15 million. So unless someone can demonstrate that the film got around the 50/50 split with theaters and took in 100% of the box office with no marketing budget then film was not a minor success even if it wasn't a total bomb either so I've removed the claim it was a minor success. Notcharliechaplin (talk) 22:51, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'm not sure this movie counts as a minor box office success based on standard metrics 

message: if was back in the 50s why does Cuba gooding jr have a cell phone? 2600:1008:B145:4967:0:51:C6C1:101 (talk) 00:27, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  What year is this movie based on?