lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hack (video game)

message: I am a proud lifetime computer geek. I remember Truscott, I remember Usenet before Godwin's anecdote, and still... The article is short. I see no error in it, but still...
I am unable to "cite any references or sources." 
Why? Because my memories do not qualify. I am almost 60 now, the dying breed, a hacker born without a computer. If only I had a video recorder back then, or a blog...
Perhaps I should put up a web page and use that as a reference?
-- 194.215.123.93 (talk) 16:43, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "This article does not cite any references or sources" 

message: Well , This article maybe be small and adding the release date in lead may seem like pointless repetition but according to Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Article guidelines#Organization, "[in the] Lead section: The name of the game in bold italics, its gameplay genre, release date, platform, and other identifying information go first." The lead first para should present the basic background information (in this case,  release dates etc) per WP:LEADPARAGRAPH. Just as how the infobox (which summarises the article, like the lead) has the release date, so does the lead section need to have it. Sincerely, Ugog Nizdast (talk) 07:48, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Created in 1982. Release date 1984. "A 1984 game..." Ummm, someone should straighten out the years references in this article... Oathed (talk) 13:20, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release date in lead section 

message: It's wrong to say that Hack has a GUI, it's not, it's a text-based interface. Heck, it's clear as day if you click on the included link to "graphical user interface".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.212.12.111 (talk) 20:32, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interface 

message: I worked with Andries Brouwer at what became CWI in 1982. Andries always had his dog with him, so the first thing he added to the Lincoln-Sudbury "hack" was a dog. For more detail, see the postscript to this blog post. DavidSHRosenthal (talk) 17:08, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Dog 

message: 67 FIZIcoin 89.24.49.214 (talk) 16:54, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  FIZIho ŠÍLENÁ výzva
Talk:MassMoca

message: I recall a big fuss, prolly in the 1995-2005 period, when there was a big fuss between the museum and anartist who sued the museum for not carrying thru with a big exhibit museum scrubbed when the work was well advanced. Seems to me a big paper (NYT? BGlobe?) headlined abt a monetary settlement that ended with an impressive string of zeros  going to the artist. Hopefully not the most important tthing we should include, but i seeno mention at all.--Jerzy•t 21:18, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dispute with artist
Talk:Balwyn

message: The suburb boxes of  Surrey Hills and Balwyn conflict with eachother. Which one is correct? Somebody in the WWW 08:42, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: They're both correct. Balwyn is to the north of both Canterbury and Surrey Hills. Most of the new suburb boxes don't allow more than one suburb per cell though, which is in my opinion, a major problem with them - this is why. TPK 10:58, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: What about MelbSuburbBox2? Somebody in the WWW 23:07, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflicting suburb boxes 

message: Deepdene is now officially a suburb - it will require a page for itself and obviously changes to any sections of the Balwyn page that refer to it. Mustard Pot (talk) 06:19, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deepdene now separate suburb 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) The Night Watch (talk) 14:42, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 17 January 2023
Talk:Seven Separate Fools

message: Hey, I’ve never used Wikipedia before, but I realized it’s rather hard to find the playing card included in the vinyl album. I actually have them and would like to contribute to the page by adding them. I don’t necessarily know how to do this though, or know very much information about who the cards include, what they symbolize, or information about the band in general. I really love this album, and Three Dog Night, so I would love to do this :) Stephaniestephanie1 (talk) 02:32, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Playing Card Images
Talk:Bust a Groove

message: I don't believe this game belongs in the dance computer games category or should be described as a "dancing video game."  Although it is a music game, it is played with a normal hand-held controller.  All other games in the category (that I can see) are intended to be played with a dance pad, or motion sensors.  Bust a Groove is more similar to PaRappa the Rapper in gameplay than to Dance Dance Revolution.  Please correct me if I'm wrong and there's a version of the game that involves physical dancing.  Otherwise, I'm going to move it to the rhythm game category.  --LostLeviathan 08:37, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I've altered the article so that it now describes the game more appropriately as a hybrid music/fighting game.  --LostLeviathan 20:42, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dance game? 

message: I don't believe that Pinky Diamond is 700 years old. I reverted it back to "unknown"
Akira Tomosuke 06:52, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  700 Years old 

message: Do not move (WP:MOSTM) Anthony Appleyard (talk) 16:35, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested Move

message: Who are the singers of the musics in the game ? i mean, it's a "musical game" after all, and that, some of the most important information in a game like this, is nowhere to be seen
maybe the Japanese Wikipedia has the list, but, you know, it's not like everyone knows how to read Japanese 189.60.155.246 (talk) 16:19, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Singers?
Talk:List of monarchs of Carthage

message: "Hannibal" does not refer to Hannibal Barca as I originally linked.
Ardric47 09:10, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The Ancient Carthage article says the monarchy ended in around 480BC, and was replaced by the republic, and some of the people listed with articles don't mention them being monarchs, and this article seems to greatly contradict that. Carthaginian history is not my wheelhouse, so I'd appreciate it if someone with a great understanding of Punic history could straighten this out, and maybe revamp this barebones list article as well. 
AvRand (talk) 03:21, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Doubts as to accuracy of article
Talk:Thom space

message: Is it not firstly the bundle of one-point compactifications, though? I don't see how T(p) is defined.
Charles Matthews 09:21, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: You are right and see also the below comment. Alodyne 21:21, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)

text: I am the one who is stupid; you're absolutely right. So can we agree that T(E) is not so much a bundle over anything (not sure why I ever thought so, at this point...)? And that all references to such should be removed? Alodyne 21:21, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)

message: The article attempts to explain the meaning of the Thom isomorphism as follows:
We can loosely interpret the theorem in the following geometric sense. Since E is a vector bundle it retracts onto the base B. So we might suppose that E would be cohomologically equivalent to B. In a way, the theorem bears out this expectation
This is not correct. In a vector bundle the total space  E is homotopy equivalent to the base space B, so these two spaces always have isomorphic cohomology groups. The Thom isomorphism, on the other hand, can be interpreted as a generalization of the suspension isomorphism. For a space B the the classical suspension isomorphisms is the isomorphisms H^i(B)\cong \tilde H^{n+1}(\Sigma^n B) where 
\Sigma^n B is the n-fold suspension of B. For an n-dimensional vector bundle E\to B 
its Thom space can be understood as an n-fold suspension of B, which is however twisted by the structure of the bundle. The Thom isomorphism says that if the bundle is nice enough the twist is not seen by the cohomology theory and the suspension isomorphism still holds. The meaning of "nice" depends here on the cohomology theory at hand. For the singular cohomology with {\mathbb Z}/2-coefficients every vector bundle is "nice", for the integral cohomology theory one needs to assume that bundles are orientable etc.  --69.204.54.113 (talk) 05:28, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Funnily enough, I was just reading it now, came across that passage, and wondered, what on earth?  Please include your comments into the article itself.  There is no need to be timid.  --C S (talk) 12:24, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Thom isomorphism. 

message: In the name of precision, I just want to point out that the Thom space of the trival bundle over B is the suspension of B+, B plus a disjoint base-point.  I added this to the article.  Djcrowley 15:20 6th May 2009  —Preceding undated comment added 13:19, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Base points 

message: The pullback of Thom class by zero section is Euler class.Yunzhi (talk) 13:32, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relation between Thom class and Euler class 

message: Not such a great idea to use the same notation for the Thom space — T(M) — that is used for the tangent bundle of the manifold M. Especially in an article like this one where there is constant danger of confusion.  Why not Th(M) or Thom(M) or something?2600:1700:E1C0:F340:24A9:18FE:5F8:B9F8 (talk) 22:24, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree and will go ahead and change the notation. —- Taku (talk) 23:22, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notational problem
Talk:Chaos Strikes Back

message: Correction : there are no purple worms in Chaos Strikes Back (CSB), it's armoured worms that greet you in the first room (see "http://dmweb.free.fr/CSBCreatures.htm#Worm (Internal name: Armoured Worm)" (Meta : how to do spaces ?)).
Also, it's correct that FTL never released CSB for the PC. However, Paul R. Stevens disassembled the Atari version and ported it to Windows. Now it also runs on GNU/Linux on PC as well as Mac OS X . -- StefanLjungstrand
:If no official release was made for PC, then shouldn't it be removed from the infobox? SharkD (talk) 03:10, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Corrections

message: "Grynix ernum quey ki skebow rednim u os dey wefna enocarn aquantana"
This looks to me like it's written in a constructed language, but what it means... RocketMaster 19:58, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Words 
Talk:Gourami

message: I removed the image because :Image:Male female dwarf gourami.jpg, according to its copyright notice, is non-free and GFDL-incompatible.  See discussion at :Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_images#December_5. —Tkinias 10:09, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. —Tkinias 23:12, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Non-free image

message: Moved images to gallery because they were rendering on top of text, making the page a complete mess. Tkinias 12:41, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Images

message: Hi, I added the redlink message up the top, because of all the red liks in the 'Species' section, and I think that the majority of them will not be created in the near future. Thankyou, Jam01 08:00, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The message you added states "Please remove red links which are not suitable topics for articles".  All of the species listed are suitable for articles, but they aren't created yet.  The species list as it stands is appropriate in this article, each species is wikilinked for convenience to encourage the creation of the species articles.  Please refer to item #2 under "Dealing with existing red links" in the Wikipedia:Red link article for guidance.  I've reverted your banner addition, but thanks for keeping an eye on things. Neil916 15:10, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redlinks message 

message: The subfamilies here are inconsistent with http://species.wikimedia.org/wiki/Osphronemidae
I found the following which seems to clear up the confusion - and I'm replacing Trichogastrinae with Luciocephalinae.
The Family Luciopercidae has been merged with the subfamily Belontidae: Trichogastrinae to form the subfamily Osphronemidae: Luciocephalinae (Britz et al., 1995: Ref. 37504; Britz, 2001: CAS_Ref_No 25717). 
--Ashcraft 00:46, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Luciocephalinae

message: Some genera and species in this article are listed differently from fishbase. For example, Colisa should have at least three species, not just one. Maybe this article used sources other than fishbase? Or maybe the taxonomy has been revised recently? Can someone give an advice on this? Otherwise I will just change it to current list according to fishbase --Melanochromis 06:04, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Time to revise the taxonomy?

message: How is "cherries" a redundant plural? (in introduction)  And if "gouramies" is a redundant plural, should this article not use "gourami" throughout as the preferred plural form? Mooncow (talk) 01:19, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  plurals 

message: since this is a freshwater fish, why is its use as food limited to maritime countries? --142.163.194.161 (talk) 18:55, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maritime Southeast Asian countries
Talk:Jacques Toubon

message: There was a whole lot of inaccuracies concerning the Toubon law, probably copied from incompetent journalistic commentary, while the text of the law is available on the Web! David.Monniaux 10:50, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I recall that this phrase was actually coined by Toubon's publicist at the ministry, in a quip to an English-speaking journalist. --Duncan 08:50, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mr Allgood 

message: I think that should be clarified. Foreign citizens/companies may not agree with it but I've never heard French people being against it. The translation of ads is not that big a deal anyway, providing French language documentation when selling stuff is much more important, and when most stuff nowadays comes from Asia, it's a given anyway. I'm sure native English speakers wouldn't buy things with only Chinese/Japanese documentation. Aesma (talk) 10:14, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Toubon Law is not controversial in France
Talk:Adam Woodyatt

message: Wasn;t Dot Cotton there at the start too? --bodnotbod » .....TALKQuietly)</span> 11:29, Dec 5, 2004 (UTC)
:Not according to the BBC website that I got most of this information from, no.  I may have read it wrong though, might be worth checking. -- Graham  ☺ | Talk 18:37, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope, Dot joined later in 1985, making her first appearance on 4 July 1985, while the show began on 19 February 1985, the first episode featuring both Ian and Pauline. Trampikey 00:17, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Emil von Skoda

message: This article has been moved to Emil Skoda. Google shows that the "von" form of his name is vastly outnumbered by the ordinary form (approximately 30 - 1270, when the "Law & Order" character "Dr. Emil Skoda" is eliminated). Also, his nationality has been changed to Czech -- he certainly was not German. -- Arwel 11:57, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Vlorë

message: In common with most articles about Albania, this one has very little information about the development of the city and its economy during the socialist period.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Khanates (talk • contribs) 15:43, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Economic information 

message: Katičić never discusses the change from Aulona to Vlorë in his book, so there is no reason to include footnote 13. Spokensprak (talk) 22:33, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations in etymology section 
Talk:WETP-TV

message: The studios haven't been located on the UT campus since the late 1980s when they moved to their current location on Magnolia Avenue.  I was on my school's Scholars Bowl team in the 1988-89 school year and we taped our shows at the Magnolia Avenue studio and they gave us a tour the first time we were there.  I would mention the move in the article but I don't know the exact date. LMUBill (talk) 04:49, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

message: "Knoxville station, at last?"
Doesn't sound encyclopedic to me...64.18.115.225 (talk) 01:37, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  What? 

message: Can somebody move WKOP-TV back to East Tennessee PBS? (and if possible, move to WETP-TV as the main station?) 107.77.189.41 (talk) 04:29, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert move 

message: Should we move East Tennessee PBS to WETP-TV?  192.101.255.184 (talk) 19:17, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to WETP-TV
Talk:Perfect score in a bocha match

message: from VfD:
Just... ugly. There is no article for Bocha (there was a substub in Portuguese or Spanish which didn't seem quite relevant, therefore speedy deleted). The article for Seu Osny needs drastic cleanup, but already seems to contain most of the information here except maybe the date. --Woggly 13:10, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: probably, but I doubt it's much different from Bocca. Still, one is Brazilian and one is Italian/European, so I'm not convinced they're precisely the same. --Woggly 18:52, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Category talk:Measurement

message: I'm adding back in Physics as a subcategory of Measurement - since it is intimately involved in measurement. Masurement is as much part of Physics as it is also part of Mathmematics. The argument about Physics being part of Interdisciplinary does not work - Physics is not a member of this category. Why remove Physics and leave Mathematics? Please discuss further before removing this subcategory. Thanks, Ian Cairns 13:50, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC)

message: Check top of page...
The main article for this category is Measurement.
i
i am borde what is this?????????????????
Gilawson 17:17, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism
Category talk:Botanists by nationality

message: Since this category survived Categories for Deletion, I have restored it to be a subcategory of Category:Botanists. Even though some people clearly don't want this to happen, the category has been kept - so it ought to be categorised itself. There's no point keeping the category then not putting it into subcategories! However, please do not move botanists out of :Category:Botanists and into their nationality subcategory. In order to help taxoboxes work, all botanists ought to be listed in :Category:Botanists. You may wish to dual list a German botanist's article under both :Category:German botanists and :Category:Botanists (though note that it is usually not considered good practice to list an article in both a category and its subcategory), or leave it purely in :Category:Botanists. However, do not remove the article entirely from Category:Botanists. --VivaEmilyDavies 18:14, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: These are not useful. It breaks up the complete list of botanists at :Category:Botanists, thereby making pages much harder to find when one needs to know (a) if a particular botanist has a page, and (b) what the page is titled, when adding links at e.g. a plant named by that botanist. Botanists are also highly international in their work, and the their nationality is often completely irrelevant to the areas they worked in, making it hard to predict what their nationality might have been (e.g. Siebold worked mainly on Japanese plants while based at a Dutch mission, making it very hard to know that he can only be found listed at :Category:German botanists). These subcategories would be best deleted, or at the very least, any botanist listed at one of these subcategories must also be on the full list at :Category:Botanists - MPF 14:44, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Categories: Botanists by various nationalities
Template talk:Canada class 2

message: I changed the wording on the template to "regional railways" from "class 2 railways".  I think this wording suits the current contents of the template better.  There are currently over 50 shortlines in Canada, none of which I can find an article for.  I doubt anyone's going to be adding a reasonably complete list of them to this template anytime soon.  Even if it did, I don't see it being useful navigation-wise.
If someone does want to add all Canadian shortlines to the template, I have no problem with changing the wording back.
JYolkowski 15:26, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: wording

message: It seems wrong to label the TH&B as a short line, as it was owned by two huge systems. But I can't figure out where else it could go. Any ideas? --SPUI (talk) 04:40, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: TH&B

message: Is it not odd that there are US railways in this? The ones I noticed were in the fallen flags section, such as PC - Penn Central. naturalnumber (talk) 17:17, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Penn Central operated the Canada Southern Railway and St. Lawrence and Adirondack Railway. The latter is now operated by CSX. --NE2 12:45, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: US

message: A lot of these, such as the WPY, are certainly not regionals, and there are too many former railroads to include them all in the list. How about just restricting it to current railways? --NE2 12:45, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: How is this organized?

message: Why is St. Lawrence & Atlantic listed as a fallen flag?  It's still in operation.  Why is Pan Am listed as a shortline when it's a regional?  –BMRR (talk) 00:53, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hmmm...
Talk:Greatest Hits (The Cars album)

message: Please do not change the article again without discussing it on the album discussion page. The standard format should be used unless there is a compelling reason to change it. Since nothing has been added to the discussion page to justify the deviation, I am reverting this edit. --Fantailfan 14:10, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead vocal credit in track listing section 

message: You have again changed the article without discussing it on the album discussion page. The standard format should be used unless there is a compelling reason to change it. Since nothing has been added to the discussion page to justify the deviation, I am reverting this edit again and requesting semi-protection. --Fantailfan 20:14, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead vocal credit in track listing section 

message: I'm listening to the album now, but the track "Hearbeat City" isn't included. I have the 1985 vinyl record (elektra), so maybe it's a different version.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.120.103.127 (talk) 05:12, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Heartbeat City

message: Perhaps the title should be:
: The Cars Greatest Hits
and not:
: Greatest Hits (The Cars album)
Look at the "liner notes" here: https://archive.org/details/cd_the-cars-greatest-hits_the-cars. Look at the text that would show up on the spine of the CD jewel case here: https://archive.org/download/cd_the-cars-greatest-hits_the-cars/cd_the-cars-greatest-hits_the-cars_jp2.zip/cd_the-cars-greatest-hits_the-cars_jp2%2Fcd_the-cars-greatest-hits_the-cars_0001.jp2&ext=jpg. The text is "THE CARS/THE CARS GREATEST HITS". --User123o987name (talk) 03:25, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title improvement
Talk:Houn Jiyu-Kennett

message: Footnote 3 ("Ford") points to a book that isn't mentioned anywhere in the references! What is it? 91.106.175.8 (talk) 20:41, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Rev. Master Jiyu Kennett composed a number of hymns too. There is (I think) a 'sacristy' at Throssel Hole. The OBC began giving monks Eastern-type names but switched to Western type (again, I think) and this may be part of the same approach. Rentwa 19:00, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled