Talk:She's All That

message: I think this section should be changed. I appreciate the way it mirrors the movie by repeating all the bad clichés, but this is really not the place for satire.  --91.10.28.217 (talk) 20:10, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section "Cast" 

message: Some quotes form the reviews:
* "lack of originality"
* "its characters never begin to rise above the level of cartoons and stereotypes"
* "a rote set of tiresome events"
* "it runs out of plot, with 45 minutes to go. "
* "essentially a formulaic comedy"
* "a competent regurgitation of a familiar plot"
* "Those who expect a little more substance will be frustrated."
* "Unfortunately, the constraints of the script force Zack and Laney into such rigid molds that there's no room for genuine character development or interaction."
Dancing scene my shiny behind. --91.10.28.217 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 20:57, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Way way back, the article included a bizarre claim that the slightly incongruous and unexpected dance sequence, was a source of criticism. It wasn't, as the anonymous editor has shown above, this claim isn't supported by the reviews, and the summary was changed to something more accurate. I was just checking to make sure the article wasn't repeating any mistakes from the older versions, and since I'd gone to the effort to check I thought I may as well include the links here too. -- 109.76.134.237 (talk) 04:22, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reasons for Criticism 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on She's All That. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20140729164927/https://twitter.com/QualityShorts/status/344558387813556224 to https://twitter.com/QualityShorts/status/344558387813556224
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:04, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Prinze Jr. said the budget was $6 million in 2014  but in 2019 he said it cost $7 million. He further clarified the budget started at $6 million but was increased by $900k . 
I leave this note here in case anyone else encounters the $6 million figure and wonders why it isn't included in the article. Also if there was local consensus we could probably omit the higher less reliable $10 million figure, but since Template:Infobox film warns not to "cherry pick" figures I've left the higher figure for now. -- 109.79.168.251 (talk) 11:12, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Budget 

message: 2018 review from Buzzfeed, film still holds up. (I agree obviously.)
Not adding it in isolation, but if there were more retrospective reviews (at least two or three) it might be interesting to add them. -- 109.76.196.65 (talk) 21:12, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Retrospective reviews 

message: An editor is insisting on adding excessive cast to the Infobox. Adding Kieran Culkin and Elden Henson to the Infobox is not an improvement. 
Although the documentation of Template:Infobox film advises editors to use the billing block, there is no need to put undue weight on minor roles and the WP:INFOBOXPURPOSE is to summarize key information, a long list of cast, making the list even longer does not achieve that. 
For the longest time* (even before the Template:Infobox film documentation tried to set a limit on long cast lists) this article listed the cast list in the Infobox was the 2 leads and the 7 other names that appear in clear large type on the poster. 9 cast members in the Infobox is plenty. Frankly listing only the two cast top billed (above the title) would better WP:INFOBOXPURPOSE summarize the key information. -- 109.79.160.188 (talk) 19:24, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: * this was stable for about a decade or more. -- 109.79.160.188 (talk) 19:26, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cast list in Infobox 

message: The template documentation does say that it's typically for credited writers. According to the article,  After looking at that, I now think that you are right in removing Shyamalan from the infobox. However, if he did significant edits to the screenplay, it might actually be worth adding him to the infobox. ‍Relativity ⚡️ 00:14, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Uncredited writer in infobox