lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Pat (Saturday Night Live)

message: Ah, so taking a "receptive" position when you're kissed makes you a woman. Lovely. - Cymydog Naakka 21:24, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yeah, I don't agree with that either. It seems to be a POV problem, IMHO. --Jacqui M Schedler 01:55, 29 August 2005 (UTC)

text: I've changed it to read, "Sweeney reflexively tilted her head to receive the kiss in the stereotypically feminine fashion..." Better? - dcljr (talk) 20:46, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It helps, anyway. --Jacquelyn Marie 22:08, 6 October 2005 (UTC)

text: I believe it was actually noted in one sketch that Pat's last name was Riley, and then a "no relation" joke was made. I'm only going by memory, though. 70.151.39.196 (talk) 08:39, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Pat

message: Since the ccreator said she accidently made her female. . . should it be changed?--FlareNUKE 18:50, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Um… 

message: An androgynous person is either a feminine man or a masculine woman. Is Pat even remotely masculine in ANY way? The answer is a resounding no. Therefore Pat must be male. If Pat was a woman, there'd be nothing strange about her, really. Lots of women look like that.
Pat looks 5% femanine, but I'm betting on the 3ed gender; hermaphrodyte.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.161.122.193 (talk) 03:37, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shouldn't it be obvious? 

message: I think that we should add which episodes that Pat appeared in. You know, what season and which host. We did it with the Ambiguously Gay Duo. Because I really want to know XD  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nosebutton (talk • contribs) 01:06, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episodes? 
Talk:Animal sexual behaviour

message: “ As polygyny is the most common form of polygamy among vertebrates (including humans, to some extent)
Um wat. I was halfway through slapping a citation needed on the claim in parenthesis, and then questioned if I shouldn’t just delete it entirely?
Input appreciated UsersLikeYou (talk) 08:09, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure what you're objecting to. Human polygyny is historically widespread, among everyone from the Jews during ancient times to Hawaiian kings to Mongolian rulers. Polyandry (women having multiple husbands) is much less common. IAmNitpicking (talk) 15:25, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Under polygyny
Talk:Dukes of Burgundy family tree

message: Re the sequence of dukes of Burgundy: Philip II "The Bold", Jean "The Fearless", Philip III "The Good" and Charles "Le Hardi", I rather think that the nicknames of Philip II and Charles are the wrong way round. The correct sequence is Philip "Le Hardi" (the bold), Jean "Sans Peur" (the fearless), Philip "Le Bon" (the good) and Charles "Le Téméraire" (the rash). This confusion sometimes arises because in English "hardi" and "téméraire" can both be translated as "bold". Philip II was originally nicknamed "le hardi" in the sense of "cheeky, cocky". Charles was named "le téméraire" in the admiring sense of "brave, bold", but post mortem and in retrospect "rash" is more fitting, which is usually how he is called in English.
There is an error in this family tree. Joanna (1293-1348), daughter of Robert II, Duke of Burgundy, married (1313) Philip VI, King of France. Joanna, Countess of Burgundy, married (1307) Philip V, King of France, and their daughter, Joanna (1308-1347; Countess of Burgundy after her mother's death in 1329), married (1318) Eudes IV. In addition, "La Marche" is misspelled as "La Merche" under Hugh XIII.
*Thanks for your corrections: they will be taken to consideration in a next version of this tree. muriel@pt 15:47, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Montage

message: This article was supplied with a link to photo essay which was relabeled with the text "photo montage." I think this is a little misleading (see, e.g., User:-Barry-'s comments at Talk:Photo_essay). Photo montages may also be photo essays, but not all photo montages are also photo essays. I've divorced the text from the link, as you can see. IMO this art form (which is also considered a propaganda technique, a media ethical abuse, and etc) is important enough to have its own page, if it doesn't already, or else links to multiple articles that discuss the genre. --Jeff Medkeff | Talk 19:40, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo Essay link

message: So, is this a disambiguation page? If so, why is it a stub? Fagstein 16:56, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation?
Talk:Rise Above Records

message: Just added some bands to the artist list, though it's still by no means complete. If anyone wants to have a go at finishing it, good luck with sorting artists as 'Currently Signed' or 'Previously Signed', as well as a 'UK Distributor For...' subsection! -- Viro 22:45, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Artist List 

message: I really think it is very unencyclopedic and should be removed from the article. The reason that I'm not doing this immediately is because I don't want it to be a faulty edit that results in some controversy. But I do truly believe it should be removed. I looked at other wikipedia articles about record labels, and there is no discography section like this. What are your thoughts? BacktableSpeak to Meabout what I have done 05:30, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I definitely disagree. Check out labels like Southern Lord Records or Man's Ruin Records. Both have discographies (although Man's Ruin has a separate page). Perhaps it should be broken out into a page called Rise Above Records discography. BeastmasterGeneral 18:09, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discography section
Talk:Human rights abuse

message: This page should be merged with Human rights violation. freestylefrappe 22:51, Apr 23, 2005 (UTC)
One has also to check the phrasings carefully to the wikisource of Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Some phrases are a bit careless. mikka (t) 01:52, 6 August 2005 (UTC)

message: This page has had Human Rights violations merged into it.Judgesurreal777 21:56, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Page Merger
Talk:The Simpsons family tree

message: This article was listed for deletion on 10 April, 2005. The discussion was closed with the result of no consensus.  This article will not be deleted.  You can view the discussion, which is no longer live: Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/The Simpsons family tree. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 23:02, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Closed deletion listing
Talk:ISV-Kran

message: This article was listed for deletion on 10 April, 2005. The discussion  was closed with the result of no consensus.  This article will not be  deleted.  You can view the discussion, which is no longer live: Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/Isv Kraan. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 23:06, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Closed deletion listing

message: :I have redirected the page to Unreal. There is no reason to keep this separate: it's just one of the over 30 levels of the game. — Texcarson 23:39, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Did you merge any information on the page into the Unreal article, or was it just an arbitary redirect?Johnmc (talk) 23:53, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Considering that it's 90% unsourced trivia, and that trivia is basically forbidden right now on Wikipedia, i just redirected the page. — Texcarson 01:14, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect to Unreal
Talk:Vortex Rikers

message: This article was listed for deletion on 10 April, 2005. The discussion  was closed with the result of merge and redirect to unreal.  This article will not be  deleted.  You can view the discussion, which is no longer live: Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/Vortex Rikers. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 23:18, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Closed deletion listing
Talk:Thomas D. White

message: Bio from United States Air Force sources Rogerd 23:28, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "White graduated from the Air Corps Tactical School at Maxwell Field, Alabama, in May 1938. He then entered Command and General Staff School at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas. He was named an outstanding alumni of the class 1939[2] and upon completion of this training was assigned to the Office of the Chief of Air Corps, Washington, D.C." Should be "Alumnus"?  Longinus876 (talk) 21:18, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alumni is the wrong word here?
Talk:List of Governors of New Mexico Territory

message: While redoing this page into a table, I looked and looked for Bent's Political Affiliation, and found nothing. If anyone can find it, it would be apreciated. YourNickname 23:31, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Charles Bent Political Affiliation

message: Otero did not die in office in 1906.  In fact, he lived until 1944 and wrote a several books about his life, including one covering his term as governor.  
Although he had the same name as his father, he did not use "Jr."  When clarification was required, he used "II".  His son used "Jr."  (confusing, for sure).  BlongerBros 15:51, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Otero
Talk:PULHHEEMS

message: New article from scratch, my first. Adapted from an article I wrote for Everything2 almost a year ago; at that time I worked for the Ministry of Defence, and thus I have been careful to only use public sources. The 'mental' and 'stability' measurements have been given only a skimpy treatment. It's possible that the system was used in Canada before it was used in Britain, in which case the article will have to be mildly rewritten, starting with "PULHHEEMS is a system... devised in Canada, and used by the armed forces of..." and so forth. -Ashley Pomeroy 23:35, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Brain Drain (album)

message: Where is the source for the release date in March 1989, please? This is not true. The album came out in August 1989. 92.201.107.125 (talk) 01:09, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release date 

message: Don't know if this is too trivial to mention, or where, but just putting it out there.
I have an original USA cassette release of this album, and the credit for Andy Shernoff (under the song "All Screwed Up") typoes his name as "Andy Schernoff". 2600:6C67:9540:765:4DF9:CCE6:B9B:84B0 (talk) 02:38, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Andy Shernoff
Talk:Shang Tsung

message: In regards to the “Cultural Impact” section, I’m not sure I understand its relevance. The section seems to primarily serve as a description of a Comedy Central parody video, and lends nothing in terms of actual cultural impact - which is later elaborated on in the Reception section. Could a more experienced Wiki user explain or delete this?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 40.138.114.112 (talk) 18:38, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Who voices Shang Tsung in Mortal Kombat vs DC Universe? 82.13.233.33 (talk) 17:44, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Shang's voice actor in MK vs DC

message: http://www.gamesradar.com/f/the-evolution-of-shang-tsung-and-reptile/a-20110414145628959077 --194.145.185.229 (talk) 12:56, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  A great source you should use  

message: It is hinted in the MK comics that Shang Tsung was on earth side but was secretly working for Shao Kahn to achieve his own selfish goals and that he was cursed by his Gods because his victories in the MK tournament ware been given to Shao Kahn so the gods cursed him to age rapidly.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 177.192.67.39 (talk) 21:21, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shang Tsung Origin =
Talk:Isabella piercing

message: Okay people, its time to stop this nonsense.
--While it's not really nonsense, it should be merged with another article. Perhaps FGP, it's parent.
:Well there is no Independent article on Female Genital Piercings,it is itself part of genital piercings.--Sartaj beary 18:29, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: New section
Talk:List of Canadian electoral districts (1903–1907)

message: Discrepancy here in the number of PEI seats, please help resolve Fawcett5 00:13, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: What seems to be the problem? --  Earl Andrew - talk 02:06, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)

text: hadn't noticed queens returned two members  Fawcett5 13:34, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/LevelCheck

message: Is it me, or I notice that two people who endorsed summaries on here pointed out that this user in question is using sockpuppets? Zscout370 00:17, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sockpuppets 

message: Where did I hear that word before? --cesarb 22:07, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Socratic?
Talk:Udo Kasemets

message: Moved page, there was a typo in the original article title! Sabine's Sunbird 00:22, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article currently uses text from , permision is given for this on the site. I'm wondering how we mote this on the page without the correct template. Sabine's Sunbird 00:31, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  citing original text 

message: I have assessed this as a Stub, as it contains only the basic information on the subject of the article, and of low importance, as I do not feel that many people outside of his brand of music would be familiar with the subject of the article. Cheers, CP 02:12, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:Hereditary succession models

message: the writer of this article has somehow confused several concepts. 62.78.120.160 00:40, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)

message: The contents of this (in my opinion, sadly deficient) article are talking only about succession by some sort of primogeniture in a hereditary succession.
Where are succession laws of elective monarchy (and other cases of non-hereditary succession), which also should be legitimate and required content under title "succession laws"?
Where are succession laws of non-primogenitural successions (such as seniority, tanistry, rotation, proximity of kinship), which also should be legitimate and required content under title "succession laws"?
Etc.  62.78.104.193 22:38, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: No, we should not expand this article, since the expended knowledge is written in at least one order of succession, or perhaps even in several, other articles already. I recommend finding another title for this piece of text. 62.78.104.193 23:49, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: We can merge the information of this article with Order of succession and make this article "Succession laws" a redirect to that page. --Neigel von Teighen 22:33, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the title of the article really correct?
Talk:Madonna of the Trail

message: Did You Know
...Madonna of the Trail is a series of monuments dedicated to the spirit of the pioneer woman in the United States? Created by German immigrant August Leimbach, they were placed in 12 states from Maryland to California in 1928 and 1929. 
This should be a featured article Redwolf24 03:14, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Blurb for DYK

message: another Madonna picture, this one from Springerville AZ, and I was looking at it thinking, I was there fairly late in the afternoon, having driven from Dixon NM that day, and if she is facing west the sun should be in her face, not on her back.  So does that mean that all this talk about all of them except the one in Bethedsa facing west is not right?  Food for thought.  Carptrash 23:56, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  I just posted another 

message: I pose this question about the appropriateness of the last addition at 3:30 June 3, 2020 who wrote "I updated the history of the statue in Upland, California."  The Black Lives Matter protest was notable enough to get a little media coverage, but was not associated in any way with the Madonna of the Trail monument or its theme of pioneering women.  My Q is:  is the addition of info on any nearby event, unrelated to the actual monument, relevant enough to be included?  For ex., a major car accident at the site?  I have re-positioned this Edit as (arguably) a first example of a monument (Upland's) serving as a community landmark, and added the appropriate citation.  Thoughts, folks? TashaB 16:25, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relevance of listing info on a protest at site of monument
Talk:Xfwm

message: Since 4.0 release developers call the desktop environment "Xfce" or "XFCE", and definitely not "XFce". --Anthony Ivanoff 01:05, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge proposed. JASpencer 21:12, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved XFwm to Xfwm 

message: I have erased the dubious statement, so this section is no longer valid. 24.235.164.79 23:59, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who was first?
Talk:Jennifer Ehle

message: I am not so sure about Jennifer Ehle being an American actress altogether which is of course debateable. But since her mother is English and her father American,I think she can be called both.
I think it makes more sense to describe her as British so I changed it. Quite a few British actors are listed under the "American actors" category on WP, even those of British parentage and citizenship. It doesn't seem to work the other way though- Halle Berry and Alicia Silverstone aren't categorised under British actors, despite having at least one British parent. JW
You are right, though I just read an article recently where they said that she lives in the U.S. and has a soft American accent now. I wonder if it is true.
A recent interview on the BBC's "Woman's Hour" confirms the accent thing. Also, if you read the fan interview linked at the bottom of the main page, she says she considers herself American. She lives in the US and is married to an American. ----Jennite
:(The Ehles are friends of my family.) She's definitely American ... but she has done most of her acting in the UK. So she's a "British actress" I suppose. I'm going to get some current info and update the pages accordingly (and create one for John). Joe n bloe 10:34, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: She is on record as stating she got British citizenship when she was cast in Pride and Prejudice. Without a reliable source saying she has since renounced it, she would be accurately described as an American and British actress. StrodoDoggins (talk) 19:01, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Nationality

message: The subject also played the role of Oscar Wilde's wife in the film Wilde with Stephen Fry as Oscar but I'm not sure when this was without checking. SmokeyTheCat 11:39, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Mrs Wilde
Talk:Bamba (snack)

message: this sanction should be erased. the link you gave is broken or deleted and bamba was tested and approved as good for kids.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.142.168.86 (talk) 03:31, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Please be specific as to what your issue is an provide a WP:RS to back up your claim - GalatzTalk 12:51, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  criticism 

message: It seems that there should be information provided to support the claim that Bamba has been promoted as a "healthy" snack in order to honor the opposite viewpoint. In addition, further evidence to support the alternative claim that Bamba is not a "healthy" snack should also be included.
Arinsenior (talk) 17:18, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of Alternate Viewpoint
Talk:Revelations (2005 TV series)

message: There definately needs to be more info! Rangeley 01:15, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Info!!

message: Does the series actually call the Romanist organization "fundamentalist?"  Do any members of the RCC call themselves "fundamentalist"? On the understanding that "justification by faith (apart from works) is a fundamental of the faith, the term "fundamentalist" is basically inappropriate for the papal organization.  "Fundamentalist" supposedly referred to one who believed the basic doctrines of Christianity, as opposed to modernists who denied anything and everything. The term has been changed to a slur word by the media, using it to mean extremist, even moslem bombers.  Actually this sort of use of the term "fundamentalist" acts as a slur on Christians who believe the basic doctrines of the faith and is a quasi-N-word.  Should the term be changed in the article to "conservative" or "traditionalist" or what?  BTW, the sole reference for this article I found to be unverifiable.  When I clicked on it, it went nowhere.  The main webpage CruxProject.org goes to a Chinese (or similar script) page.  CruxProject.com is a living website, but it does not appear to mention the word "fundamentalist."  Since I could find no evidence that a reliable secondary source ever used the term "fundamentalist" in it context used in the Wikipedia article, I have changed it to "traditionalist" as a suggestion.  (EnochBethany (talk) 16:31, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Fundamentalist?
Talk:One Word Extinguisher

message: On April 6, 2005, this article was nominated for deletion.  The result was keep and cleanup.  See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/One Word Extinguisher for a record of the discussion. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 01:20, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: VfD

message: *All song titles serve as redirects to this album, have their own pages, or have been placed at the appropriate disambiguation pages.--Hraefen Talk 22:29, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: '''<^>v!!This album is connected!!v<^>'''
Talk:Student number

message: On April 6, 2005, this article was nominated for deletion.  The result was keep.  See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Student number for a record of the discussion. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 01:24, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: VfD

message: It wouldn't go abc1... abc10. For a start, modern CRSids are five characters long (the old ones were seven, and five again before that). For another thing, they don't allocate xxxx1 (presumably because it looks like an L); they always begin with 2. The Wednesday Island 19:45, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  CRSid 

message: This applies to Australia. 
:"From 1 January 2015, all students doing nationally recognised training need to have a Unique Student Identifier (USI). This includes students doing Vocational Education Training (VET) in schools."
See www.usi.gov.au/About/Pages/default.aspx. Perhaps this should be added to this page? 220 of Borg 06:30, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unique Student Identifier 

message: This section is apparently filled with a lot of wrong information.
First of all, current Austrian student IDs are - as in the example listed in this section - 7 digit numbers, not 8 digtis numbers. The current correct format would be: YYUUXXX
Second, the university issuing the number is - to my knowledge - a 2 digit number, in such a way, that each university has a specific range of Student IDs per academic year.
There can be a prepending lowercase latin letter (f.e.: a = University of Vienna, e = Technical University of Vienna, s = University of Applied Arts), which is not part of the students ID, but may be used in email adresses to show the students affiliation.
Third, the number of enrollment should therefore consit of UUXXX, and is a number out of the university's number pool. Lcnittl (talk) 16:26, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Student ID Austria
Talk:For You (Casey Donovan album)

message: Moved it here.  Am creating a stub for the Prince album of the same title, and turning For You into a disambig page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcsweet (talk • contribs) 01:35, 24 April 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved article
File talk:B007 Pen y Ghent climb.JPG

message: Discussion moved from User talk:Soloist#Image:B007 Pen y Ghent climb.JPG and User talk:Ellmist#Image:B007 Pen y Ghent climb.JPG.
Did you take this picture? Have a nice day. --Ellmist 05:29, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright