Talk:Andreas Floer

message: I would like to disambiguate monopole in this article, but can't tell whether the link should be to magnetic monopole or some yet uncreated topology monopole page. I'm leaving the link to the disambiguation page for someone more knowledgeable to fix. Wnissen 02:25, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I don't understand the significance or relevance of this section.  Naturally, they are different from publications Andreas Floer published when he was alive, but I don't feel that one should bring attention to a math paper by virtue of the author being deceased when it was published.  If it is mathematically significant, we can put it under "selected publications", otherwise I see no reason.  --C S 02:19, September 5, 2005 (UTC)
What might be best is just to write more about Hofer in the biography section and perhaps reference a paper that could be considered their best work together.  --C S 02:19, September 5, 2005 (UTC)
I completely agree (my email to you; maybe Hofer will say something about this posthumous collaboration) --Erkabo 12:03, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Posthumous publications

message: Hi C S, would you find it advisable to put in this statement by Donaldson:
“One of Floer’s most decisive achievements was his solution of the “Arnold conjecture” on fixed points of a symplectomorphism.”
It is from his text that I put into “Further reading” - hope you will agree. A footnote for the citation would read:
Simon Donaldson, On the work of Andreas Floer, Jahresber. Deutsch. Math.-Verein. 95 (3) (1993), p. 107
Maybe you could find an elegant way of joining this citation with instanton homology and the rest of the middle section of the article?
Cheers, Rolf  Erkabo 17:50, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Rolf, I don't think it's necessary to put it in as a quote, so I rephrased it and merged it into the Life section.  It's also mentioned in the references already given, but I think the Donaldson article is indeed good for further reading, so good work on finding the reference.  Anyway, it's clear the Life section requires more work at summing up Andreas' contributions in a clearer way.  Perhaps you could ask a contributor to the Floer homology page, e.g. David Farris, to add a brief historical outline of the sequence of his contributions and how it impacted the then current state of knowledge.  --C S (Talk) 04:06, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  More Donaldson!? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Andreas Floer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050903084231/http://sunsite.berkeley.edu:80/uchistory/archives_exhibits/in_memoriam/catalog/floer_andreas.html to http://sunsite.berkeley.edu/UCHistory/archives_exhibits/in_memoriam/catalog/floer_andreas.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:05, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified