Talk:Feast of Fools

message: The Feast of Fools is also the name of a popular gay and lesbian themed podcast.
Unreadable article - was it created by a gibberish-generator?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.214.39.187 (talk) 10:00, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Since there are two "Feast of Fools" entries in Wikipedia, I propose that the Feast of Fools festival page add (festival) to its name to create a disambiguation page when people search for "Feast of Fools."  RcktManChgo (talk) 22:08, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Considering that one is has a cultural history of nearly 1500 years and the other is a barely notable podcast -- I'd say no, the article should not be moved. older ≠ wiser 01:28, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If you just think to yourself, what is the Wikipedia reader most likely to be looking for in entering Feast of Fools? you won't often go wrong. --Wetman (talk) 06:41, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Johnbod (talk) 12:52, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title of page should be changed to "Feast of Fools (festival)" to create a disambiguation page. 

message: The color picture displayed with the article is actually a modern oil painting by Laurence Smith based on Bruegel's original work. Bruegel's version wasn't in color. It also may be worth mentioning that Bruegel's picture doesn't depict an actual Feast of Fools celebration, at least according to art historian Keith Moxey in 'Pieter Bruegel and The Feast of Fools,' The Art Bulletin, Vol. 64, Dec 1982, pp. 640-646: "Bruegel's subject is more closely linked to the pictorial conventions of his day than to historical circumstances. Rather than representing the activities of an actual Feast of Fools therefore, Bruegel's subject is more likely to constitute an allegory of folly." --Alexboese (talk) 19:36, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, caption changed, and the picture tagged as a probable copyvio - do you have a link for the actual author, & any knowlege relevant to copyright? Johnbod (talk) 00:57, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Here's Laurence Smith's site. I don't have any info about copyright. --Alexboese (talk) 04:26, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Picture of the Feast of Fools isn't by Bruegel 

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant 
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 01:20, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Feast of the Fools by Pieter Brueghel The Elder.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: — Assignment last updated by Somerandomguy291 (talk) 00:25, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: The Middle Ages