lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Spirillum

message: The position of Spirillum minus (rat-bite fever) in taxonomy should be clarified. Is it a member of the genus Spirillum (Proteobacteria)? Is it a spirochaete? What genus of Spirochaetes? In this reference: Krieg, Noel R. 1976. "Biology of the chemoheterotrophic spirilla." Bacteriological Reviews, vol. 40, no. 1. American Society for Microbiology. Pages 63-66 and also 55-56  the author says the species was formerly named as S. minor (by Carter in 1888) and then renamed to S. minus (better Latin). In those times there was a lot of species in the genus Spirillum but then they were moved to other genera. S. minus seems to be more related to Aquaspirillum or Campylobacter. In the LPSN S. minus is not included. Is the species name S. minus a valid name today? I don't know for sure but i think it isn´t. (talk) 19:04, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Wildlife of Alaska

message: 67.84.10.3 (talk) 16:47, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Expansion 

message: The Alaskan hare (Lepus othus), where is it? --129.69.140.138 (talk) 18:21, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  more mammals! 

message: Is it just me or s the way the fish are grouped just weird? It seems like each section just randomly groups 2 fish together and describes them seperately. Also, pretty darn sure the sculpin lives in saltwater as I have been nfortunate enough to catch them when fishing in saltwater. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:22, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: . Beeblebrox (talk) 18:23, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  fish descriptions
Talk:BenBella Books

message: Why the deletion? It's a short page about a legitimate publishing house, with bestsellers to its credit. Jbenton 20:14, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, and though the article needs more references, there is a third-party review of one of their books (I added it myself last year). Jbenton, if you know which of their titles have been bestseller, let me know and perhaps we can find some refs? — TAnthonyTalk 16:33, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed deletion
Talk:Gustav Mahler Conducting Competition

message: Prize vs. Competition - I take the point that the prize can't be triennial if it was not awarded this year. Does the page then need to be transplanted to another page entitled "Gustav Mahler Conducting Competition"?  I'm new here so advice would be appreciated on the best way to sort this out. Ebenezer Elijah 20:15, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is a competition where a prize is given. The name given at the official website is Gustav Mahler Conducting Competition. --Karljoos (talk) 22:58, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Prize vs. Competition

message: I did some work on the article. I think it looks more now like an article now. --Karljoos (talk) 22:58, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean up

message: I propose that III Gustav Mahler Conducting Competition be merged into Gustav Mahler Conducting Competition. I think that the content in the 3rd competition article can easily be explained in the context of the general competition. I don't see the need of a separate article, given the little information it contains. Karljoos (talk) 16:03, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 
Talk:Gladiator (video game)

message: Has anyone ever seen a console version of this game?  Sjasper 20:25, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Console version

message: The Graphics are different than the screenshot posted on the page.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.48.105.202 (talk) 05:28, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: American Arcade Game is different

message: So could we get this article cleaned up, please?
194.197.79.18 (talk) 13:08, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added the template. It does need editing.  2fort5r (talk) 13:03, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia isn't a game guide 
Talk:Sorin Hall (University of Notre Dame)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) SkyWarrior 01:41, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorin Hall (University of Notre Dame) →  – Per WP:COMMONNAME, this should be moved to "Sorin College". It seems that the vast majority of independent, reliable sources refer to the dorm as "Sorin College" rather than as "Sorin Hall".
These include:
#USA Today
#ABC News
#The South Bend Tribune (1 2 and what appears to be a legal notice regarding a marriage license).
#247Sports.com 
The University itself also appears to use the term "Sorin College" to refer to the dormitory in some of its official communications, including communications from Notre Dame's athletic department.
Additionally, the two campus newspapers appear to nearly exclusively use the term "Sorin College" to refer to the building:
#The Observer has done so innumerable times, but some are listed here for your perusal: 1 2 3 4 5 etc.
#The Irish Rover similarly refers to the dorm as "Sorin College" 1 2 3, etc.
Taken together, it appears that the common name of the dormitory is "Sorin College". As a result, I believe that this page should be moved. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 06:28, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 28 October 2021
Talk:XBL

message: Why are almost-but-not-quite-all acronyms surrounded by single quotes? Is this intentional for some reason or is it a mistake? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.79.7.15 (talk • contribs) 20:30, 7 May 2007
: That should be undone, imo. The quotes were added by an anonymous user with no explanation. --asqueella 21:51, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Acronyms 

message: In the second paragraph, the part that says " the language is not currently described by any formal standard " I gather the term XBL has now come to refer equally to XBL 2.0 which (as the following sentence in the article points out) is covered by a formal standard. Hence, I think that particular clause should be stricken or at least moved afterward as a parenthetic remark (a previous version known simply as XBL was developed by Mozilla, and was never standardized and is thus proprietary to Mozilla). David.daileyatsrudotedu (talk) 12:54, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formal standard
Talk:Keith Hefner

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Wikipeep 494 05:41, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This is start class at best. Wizardman 14:33, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Foreign Births Register

message: This article should really be entitled the "Foreign Births Register". The register is the one maintained in Dublin. The Entry Books are kept at Irish missions abroad. Caveat lector 20:33, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Register / Entry Book

message: :Foreign Births Entry Book → Foreign Births Register —. As the previous comment above says, the article should be titled Foreign Births Register, with a redirect to it from Foreign Births Entry Book. The Foreign Births Register is the main subject of the article, and the Foreign Births Register is a total register of all foreign births with Irish citizenship, whereas each Foreign Birth Entry Book pertains only to a subset of such births. - 194.158.79.70 (talk) 02:11, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: . Jafeluv (talk) 07:04, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: The article says that "The system of citizenship registration was established by the Irish Nationality and Citizenship Act, 1956." See however the Irish Nationality and Citizenship Act, 1935, section 25(1) - "The Minister for External Affairs shall cause to be kept:— ... (b) a register to be called and known and in this Act referred to as the foreign births register." I propose to amend the article accordingly. Alekksandr (talk) 16:47, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Start of registration system
Talk:Combat Methamphetamine Epidemic Act of 2005

message: The math in the original source for the first arrest appears to be incorrect.  
:This investigation revealed that William FOUSSE had purchased 406 Bronkaid caplets which contain 25 mg of ephedrine sulfate per tablet over a two week period, which resulted in purchasing over 29 grams of ephedrine.no they did not
25mg=0.025g x 406 caplets = 10.15g  not the more than 29g quoted.  
--zandperl 20:36, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: First arrest

message: It is incorrect that Fousse was the first arrest under CMEA.  The first arrest actually appears to be Tim Naveau, who was arrested in September 2006, certainly before the Fouse arrest in March 2007.  I am going to change this section of this article to reflect this fact.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr gonzo9 (talk • contribs) 20:54, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: First arrest
Talk:Papaya Suzuki

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hiroshi Suzuki (tarento). Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  signed, Rosguill talk 07:33, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Hiroshi Suzuki (tarento)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Notre Dame, Our Mother

message: How do we know this song's lyrics aren't in the public domain? I have no evidence otherwise, but I'd like to know where it's copyrights can be confirmed and when the lyrics will become public domain. --MrCalifornia 20:12, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The lyrics were written in 1930. They won't enter the public domain until 2025 at the earliest thanks to the Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act. --Daysleeper47 (talk) 14:42, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Public Domain
Talk:Field marshal (United Kingdom)/Archive 1

message: I have a recollection that the rank of Field Marshal is held for life and the holder never formally retires. Anyone confirm or debunk? Folks at 137 20:41, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Life appointment

message: I know the Queen is an honorary colonel. Is she actually a Field Marshal? Pdfpdf (talk) 14:49, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Queen's appointments? 
Talk:Irish Guard (Notre Dame)

message: *I disagree, do not merge them, the Irish Guard is distinct enough and has enough differences and uniqueness from the band that it merits its own page separate from the band's. 00:28, 9 February 2011  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.254.225.68 (talk)  
*I also feel that the Irish Guard is something much different and intrinsically cooler than the band, so they should not be forced to share a page.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.122.242.138 (talk) 23:28, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Issue
File talk:USpatent6987991 emoticon.jpg

message: Source and licensing are required.--Nowa 20:44, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Source and licensing

message: If this were reproduced as an SVG, would it have to contain the numbers and seemingly random brackets? 87.55.133.108 (talk) 20:48, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know.  Why do you ask?--Nowa (talk) 11:37, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  SVG?
Talk:Paskah Rose

message: What signifigance is this article, if any?
If there is no reason for it, should it be merged into other articles like it? (For example; an article titled "Minor English people hanged [1600-1700]")
If there IS signifigance, adding it to the article may be a good idea. :Þ —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jaesaces (talk • contribs) 21:47, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Signifigance 

message: There are no hits on Google Books or Scholar for "Paskah Rose" but numerous for "Pascha Rose".  It seems that the article should be moved to Pascha Rose.  Cusop Dingle (talk) 18:30, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paskah or Pascha
Talk:Mick Whitnall

message: I'm quite sure that the Skin Deep Band that is mentioned here is more a ska-band than an Oi!-Band. There was a scottish Oi! Band called "Skin Deep", too. Mik Whitnall did not play in this band. He played in a ska-combo called "Skin Deep". --87.174.113.143 (talk) 15:34, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Skin Deep
Talk:Kawanishi E15K

message: A Kawanishi E15K1 was found submerged near Palau Island.
source: popular science magezine september 2013  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.230.139.52 (talk) 02:41, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  known aircraft 

message: What exactly is the POINT of a detachable float? Once the float is jettisoned, there is no way for the plane to land safely. You have to ditch it, which is going to cause quite a lot of damage even if things go very well. Belly land of the ground? Sure, it might be nice to save the pilots, but I didn't think Japan cared all that much about that. And how did they KNOW the planes were shot down because the float refused to jettison? The pilots never made it back to tell them about it! Did he pilots survive the crash and find their way back into Japanese hands to report, or what? AnnaGoFast (talk) 18:26, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Float
Talk:Father (Death Note episode)

message: For trivia: I'm pretty sure Light's lifespan in this episode is the same as his lifespan back in episode 3. This would be consistent with when Rem says in episode 14 that killing L might lengthen Light's lifespan. -byelf2007
: I imagine his lifespan changes quite frequently, given the regularity of his death note usage. - LeonWhite 00:49, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Your lifespan increases or decreases based on how many times you use the deathnote? or are you guys talking about Misa's increase/decrease based on her shinigami eyes and the shinigami giving life to her when THEY die?Adreamtonight 03:49, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:MS Berge Istra

message: MS or MV, after all? 37.45.130.253 (talk) 07:18, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: ATTENTION: USER WHO LEFT FIRST HAND ACCOUNT OF EXPERIENCE AT OKINAWA BASE AT TIME OF DISASTER. 
RESPECT NPOV RULES! Please do not leave personal accounts in a encyclopedia project!
I am editing those three paragraphs out. I believe that will leave the pertinent facts of the situation
intact.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.240.219.118 (talk) 03:09, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personal accounts
Talk:Eutychius of Alexandria

message: I added an infobox and referencing from The Catholic Encyclopedia, the version from which it comes being in the public domain.  I didn't feel wholly comfortable copying wholesale from my source (http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/05639a.htm) despite this.  Should anybody else feel so inclined, there's my source.  —  pd_THOR | =/\= | 14:28, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: expansion

message: Is this a different Eutychius of Egypt/Alexandria than the patriarch credited with the Origines translated from Arabic into Latin by John Selden? Because, if so, that guy needs a dab header. If not, the Origines is either the more famous name or more famous book this guy put out, since it was important in Catholic/Prod/Presbyterian feuding around Europe. — LlywelynII 15:19, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: So...
Talk:Stanley Edgar Hyman

message: I have commenced a tidy-up of the Bibliography section:
* Cite templates will be used where possible.
* I prefer capitalization and punctuation to follow the standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, rather than "title case".
* Links (either direct or indirect) to potentially unreliable or incomplete digitised copies and to booksellers may be removed. 
This is a work in progress; feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 03:40, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography
Template talk:Louisville, Kentucky

message: Steve's been wanting a template for Louisville, so I created one.  Doing one based on Los Angeles, as he recommended, was not working, so I based it off the New York City one.  I based the prominent neighborhoods on those most prominently mentioned in the corresponding article, although I knew the Highlands should have been mentioned.  Any other considerations?--Bedford 20:54, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Creation

message: Should the Falls of the Ohio link be to the National Wildlife Conservation Area, or to the State Park?--Bedford 06:42, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I would use the conservation area, although it's kind of like splitting hairs between the two.  Perhaps once we have a parks template, or a parks portion of this one, the state park could be included. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 00:04, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Falls of the Ohio

message: Would there be any objection to giving this template a gold-like color rather than purple?  I recently pulled the goldish color from the city's seal that I'm now using in WikiProject Louisville. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 00:02, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Color change

message: I just added two top subjects.
# George Rogers Clark - founder of Louisville, Kentucky.  I think this is self-explanatory.
# KFC - an iconic company and brand that is essentially an ambassador for the city all around the world.  I included a link to its history article and to its founder Colonel Sanders.
I realize that we should want to keep this template section tight, but I realized that these two subjects were glaring omissions based on their importance to the city. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 10:36, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added two top subjects 

message: When reviewing other key aspects of Louisville, I realized other subject areas and articles were missing, and then after adding them, I realized that a split of "Subject areas" was in order.  I created History and Geography sections to capture those added articles.  Please feel free to voice any concerns if I've done anything objectionable or just needs more adjustments. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 13:13, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split of "Subject areas" section
Talk:Names of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa

message: Why are these two separate articles, as they really relate to a common theme. Though, I guess Pakhtunkhwa really relates more to a naming converntion within Pakistan?? May just be easier to incorporate the info into one page, and avoid duplication. Nlsanand (talk) 00:48, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The article topic is fundamentally different from  Pashtunistan and is too long to be merged and still maintain the integrity of the NWFP/Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa article so I've reworked it slightly and am moving it to Names of Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa per WP:BOLD.  —  AjaxSmack  22:37, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree - this article is better as independent. Mar4d (talk) 14:06, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger with [[Pashtunistan]] 

message: Yes it relates to a naming convention within Pakistan.  If NWFP gets renamed Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakhtunkhwa should probably redirect there.  (See also Talk:North-West Frontier Province#Requested move).  In that case, maybe this article should become Names of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.  This article could include much of the info on the naming dispute that is in the article now plus a little on the other names mentioned (Khyber, Afghania, Abasin, Nuristan, &c.)  —  AjaxSmack  04:43, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I am moving it per WP:BOLD.  —  AjaxSmack  22:37, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Or rename? 

message: I am uncertain about this article. It might be more logical to integrate it into a chapter of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. The current title seems overly complex and might hinder its discoverability. Any idea @Saqib? Crosji (talk) 05:51, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Sometimes, it's wise to seek out a 3rd opinion so pinging  —Saqib (talk I contribs) 06:35, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Complex title raises questions
Talk:Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital

message: Hi--please help a little, I'm ignorant to copyright law. The image on the page is public domain as it is a Central Government hospital in India, where all hospitals are non-profit and government run due to socialized medicine. How would I indicate this in the copyright tag to prevent the image from being deleted? Chantoke 20:54, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Undertow (video game)

message: If you read the wording of the announcement from Microsoft, Undertow isn't actually being given as compensation for Live issues, but as a celebration of the success of the service:
"At the same time we would like to offer a token of our appreciation to all of you in celebration of record success for the service.  And as a thank you for your loyalty during this holiday period, we will be offering all of our Xbox LIVE members around the world access to a full Xbox LIVE Arcade game that will be available to download free of charge.  In the coming weeks we will be sharing the specific details of this offer with you."  From http://www.xbox.com/en-CA/support/live/serviceissue.htm
Sorry, my wiki skills suck.
--32.97.110.142 (talk) 22:08, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Compensation vs. Pat on the back 

message: See no section about the extra content, should someone add a little sentence like:
"Made available on the Market Place an expansion pack (Release date), allowed players to play as the alien race encountered towards the end of the game and even giving the aliens there own campaign." 
Or something along those lines? Mcnichoj (talk) 05:03, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  DLC 

message: The plot section makes little sense. Lots42 (talk) 11:27, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot
Talk:Gliese 581d

message: Figures shown for radius and density are purely speculative.  All we really know from the data is mass and period, unless a reliable source for these figures can be found this data should be removed. Rich.lewis 21:01, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I calculated the radius and density of the planet when the star's radius, semi-major axis, and planet mass are known. See talk:Gliese 581 c/Archive 1#Radius for my equation. BlueEarth 01:18, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

text: The mass of our moon in relation to Earth is 1/81.3 or 0.0123. BlueEarth (talk | contribs) 02:06, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced Facts 

message: How can we know that Gliese 581 d has a Earth radius of 2.2 if it doesn't transit the star?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by MartinZ02 (talk • contribs) 18:17, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Radius 

message: See e.g. Robertson et al. 2014, Hatzes 2016, Dodson-Robinson et al. 2021. There is a paper questioning the initial 2014 refutation (Anglada-Escudé & Tuomi 2015), published along with a paper questioning that paper (Robertson et al. 2015). The planet is treated as disproven by the Extrasolar Planets Encyclopedia and NASA Exoplanet Archive. Much of this is mentioned in the article, but it doesn't seem to be given sufficient weight. Much of this also applies to Gliese 581g. Thoughts? SevenSpheres (talk) 17:04, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does the article sufficiently reflect studies showing that the planet likely doesn't exist? 

message: I was checking exoplanet.eu's list (https://exoplanet.eu/catalog/) and marked to show only the "other" (not confirmed or candidate) planets. Then, i saw Gliese 581 g in the list (https://exoplanet.eu/catalog/gj_581_d--398/) and checked the bibliography. The most recent paper (https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/2515-5172/ad1de4) has the name "The Once-canceled Habitable-zone Super-Earth Gliese 581d Might Indeed Exist!" InTheAstronomy32 (talk) 19:47, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: That has already been added to the article. SevenSpheres (talk) 20:51, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  New study show that it may exist.