lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Robotics

message: I saw there is a draft for Neural Radiance Fields. It may be of interest to members of this project. Thriley (talk) 16:25, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Draft:Neural Radiance Fields]] 

message: You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Content assessment#Proposal: Reclassification of Current & Future-Classes as time parameter, which is within the scope of this WikiProject.  This WikiProject received this message because it currently uses "Current" and/or "Future" class(es). There is a proposal to split these two article "classes" into a new parameter "time", in order to standardise article-rating across Wikipedia (per RfC), while also allowing simultaneous usage of quality criteria and time for interest projects. Thanks! —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 06:58, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion at [[Wikipedia:Content assessment]] 

message: FYI:
*Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Information fuzzy networks
You're invited to give your opinions.
--A. B. (talk • contribs  •  global count) 14:11, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  FYI: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Information fuzzy networks]] 

message: Hi, as a New Page Reviewer, I have stumbled across this article Force control. It was created as a translation of the German article at :de:Kraftregelung. Can members of this project confirm if this is a content fork of an existing English Wikipedia article?
Please continue any further discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Physics#New article at Force control. Thank you, Fork99 (talk) 04:52, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  New article at [[Force control]] 

message: International Aerial Robotics Competition has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 04:13, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good article reassessment for [[International Aerial Robotics Competition]] 

message: You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) § AI for WP guidelines/ policies.  ExclusiveEditor Notify Me! 14:39, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Invitation for discussion
Talk:Hamilton White House

message: The article has been nicely developed by someone, but there are no/minimal references for all the new text.  Could someone please provide source(s)?  If you don't know how to format them, just write the info here or in the article any which way, and then i or someone else could fix the ref formatting. doncram (talk) 20:39, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  References needed 

message: Is this an article about Hamilton White's house? Or a biography of Hamilton White? Or an article about the White family and their descendants and influence in Central New York? This article tries to be too many things at once. Note that there exists an article about Andrew Dickson White and Horace White (1865 – 1943), and maybe some of the other family members deserve separate articles also. - Kzirkel (talk) 23:17, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Focus of the article is fuzzy
Talk:Olivia Grant (actress, born 1983)

message: PaintedCarpet (talk) 16:17, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyedited 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: No consensus. As always, when there is no consensus primary topic, we disambiguate. Give it more time to see whether the name Olive Gray becomes more universally recognized. –  wbm1058 (talk) 01:17, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 14:42, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

text: That's an argument that Olivia Grant (actress, born 1983) isn't primary per WP:PT2 and a perfect complement to my argument that it's not primary per WP:PT1. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 00:49, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, I'm not seeing that either has significant enduring notability or educational value, so this case is mostly decided on criterion #1. wbm1058 (talk) 01:17, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 7 November 2023 

message: *at 20:23, 15 March 2009  moved page  to 
*at 02:59, 20 March 2009  moved page  to  (born in 1994, so page must move to fit this nomenclature)
*at 03:59, 25 April 2012  moved page  to  (naming convention)
*at 15:43, 20 November 2013  moved page  to  (Following Wikipedia naming conventions)
*at 13:11, 31 January 2014  moved page  to  over redirect (comma not needed)
*at 10:13, 1 July 2014  moved page  to  over redirect (WP:NCPDAB)
*at 09:11, 8 December 2017  moved page  to  (now known professionally as Olivia Gray)
*at 22:58, 15 March 2019  moved page  to  (new legal name and stage name of this person)
*at 13:28, 6 October 2020  moved page  to Olive Gray (no disambiguation needed)
"Several years" is a bit ambiguous, as apparently the last name changed from Grant → Gray before the first name changed from Olivia → Olive.
In any event, it's just been four years since the name was changed to the current name "Olive Gray", which based on some arguments above may yet be insufficient time for the current (actress) name to be sufficiently widely recognized as a consensus primary-topic name. – wbm1058 (talk) 18:24, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: That's an argument that Olivia Grant (actress, born 1983) isn't primary per WP:PT2 and a perfect complement to my argument that it's not primary per WP:PT1. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 00:49, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, I'm not seeing that either has significant enduring notability or educational value, so this case is mostly decided on criterion #1. wbm1058 (talk) 01:17, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move history
Talk:The Betrayal

message: Perhaps the plot should be in forward chronological order, with sections to indicate the order in which they are seen in the episode? 174.50.210.156 (talk) 22:39, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: On 24 October 2011, someone added a line saying "Vegtable Lasagna aka Magnus" appeared in an earlier episode. Who or what is Vegtable Lasagna, besides being misspelled? Is it an animal? Article vandalism? 184.98.115.101 (talk) 06:16, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Continuity 

message: Betrayal (disambiguation) In ictu oculi (talk) 02:53, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Not the only subject

message: These two (users  and ) think it’s «less clear» and «confusing» to leave this matter unexplained, contra the episode writers themselves (see diff). Tuvalkin (talk) 22:13, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: If you reject the episode's own explanation that she bought the tickets just to further annoy Mary Sue Ellen with some companions, you might as well ask why she would buy a ticket for anyone, since she had been reliably informed that India is an awful place to visit and was only going there to spite Mary Sue Ellen. Either way, a ticket for Nina makes as much sense as a ticket for Kramer. Martin IIIa (talk) 20:34, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

text: Martin's explanation is spot on, but I also had an issue with the  part. How is this not confusing? So, now the reader needs to skip ahead and "see below" in the plot summary to understand what's meant by FDR's curse? Jauerbackdude?/dude. 14:22, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  A ticket for Nina? Why?
Talk:Afgoi

message: Merge with/redirect to Afgooye?--ukexpat (talk) 22:45, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yup. Being bold and redirecting. Revert me if I'm wrong. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 22:50, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Works for me.--ukexpat (talk) 22:54, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:HD 122563

message: Before the composition peculiarities can be invoked in this article, there's a need to explain the notation [X/Fe] somewhere, probably in metallicity.  BSVulturis (talk) 22:48, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I added the requisite discussion to Metallicity, though this stuff is pretty arcane. BSVulturis (talk) 21:21, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Bolivian Primera División

message: Can someone explain to me the difference between Liga de Fútbol Profesional Boliviano and Primera División de Bolivia? I saw that the Spanish page of this entry and it calls the league the First Division. Is there a reason why this page isn't called the Bolivian Primera División? Is it the same or is there a difference?
AquilaXIII (talk) 12:12, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Liga de Fútbol Profesional Boliviano vs Primera División de Bolivia
Talk:Fast-roping

message: Does anyone have any information on when this technique for troops insertion was developed and introducd into military service. To the best of my knowledge, it had been trialled in the mid to late 80s and implemented thereafter. However, that's only going by hearsay of defence force personnel I've spoken to.
If I find any info myself, I maybe add it and any links to the article. (Bobbo9000 (talk) 22:51, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 
Talk:Paradise Hotel 2

message: Projectlongbeach - Raheim should be above Johnny since he was eliminated after Johnny.  —Preceding comment was added at 03:53, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

message: I have on the Temp page a more sounding Wikipedia page. I just started but will improve it in the next couple of days. This version is not copy and pasted from any source. ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 02:48, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replacement Text
Talk:Andy Starr

message: This might not be notable enough so you may return it to a redirect if desired.--T. Anthony (talk) 22:54, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

message: :I've changed my mind and decided he probably is notable after all. Please don't revert into a redirect without asking.--T. Anthony (talk) 14:06, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have removed an improperly formatted hatnote of questionable utility. Just in case I'm missing a valid reason for its placement, here's corrected code for the note I removed:
*
—jameslucas ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ 13:31, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hatnote
Talk:Kenny Brannigan

message: Hi Thumperward,
The updates that you have dismissed as 'nonsense'; why is it nonsense exactly? All input listed happened and is supported by the references provided. If you feel there is anything there not covered by a reference just say so and one will be sourced.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.100.250.228 (talk) 13:13, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Some parts of it were quite obviously personal commentary from begrudged Queens fans, for instance the part about not playing Dobbie in the European games. Other parts were largely irrelevant, such as the continued insinuation that Chisholm was looking for another job. This isn't Chisholm's biography, it's Brannigan's. In the process of undoing the changes I made you removed a fair amount of formatting cleanup in the references. I'll leave this for the next few hours to see if it's improved, but if not I'll be reverting it again. Our policy on the biographies of living people is very clear - they are to err on the side of caution regarding negative material and are not to be used for fan interpretation of events, results or motives. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 13:23, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

text: Please sign your posts. The wording I removed from the article was as follows: Notably in both games, Chisholm refused to award a starting place to Stephen Dobbie, the greatest talent at the club in a generation This is "referenced" to a club history article which does not "note" this at all, let alone sing Dobbie's praises (which are all very well and good, but not in such a format and not here). Likewise, the comments on Chisholm's having discussed other jobs were interspersed with commentary (derived from a results table, rather than reporting of such) which cast a rather negative light on the seasonal performance. Anyway, I see that Jmorrison230582 has removed the questionable material again, so it seems that this is resolved. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 19:56, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 
Talk:Gaspar Makale

message: I had tagged the article with , , and . They were all removed in the last edit. What was your reason for removing those tags? Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 22:59, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of improvement tags

message: Looks like the page is not being deleted. So page needs an infobox.
Sputink (talk) 15:32, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox
Talk:Biocultural evolution

message: Propose to expand this article .. perhaps following the following structure/schema .. if this is agreeable and finds no objections?:
1 expanding the current introductory summary, more clearly describing it as a bioloigcal/social science synthesis and concept
2 provide a brief history of the concept, including social Darwinism - through sociobiology - to biocultural evolution 
3 review units of analysis variously considered to be the locii at which 'biocultural evolution' is understood to occur (just as 'genes' are the unit key within the strictly biological analogies
4 review mechansims variously considered to be the means by which 'biocultural evolution' is understood to occurr (including discussion of natural selection, adaption, innovation etc)
5 review biocultural evolutionary studies: human biology => culture/behaviour
6 review biocultural evolutionary studies: culture/behaviour => human biology
7 review biocultural evolutionary studies': mutual interactions and multiplier effects/processes are emphasised in a more broad manner, locating human individuals as organisms within broader ecologies (including socio-cultural 'environments).
8 review biocultural evolution: ramifications, hypothesis and/or predictions for the future.. including predicted globally warmer future.
====1990LOPR====
LOPREATO, Joseph (1990) "From Social Evolutionism to Biocultural Evolutionism" Sociological Forum.  Volume 5, Number . Pages 187-212.
====2005GRASS====
GRASSIE, William J (2005) Biocultural Evolution in the 21st Century: The Evolutionary Role of Religion.  Paper Presented at the XXII International Congress of History of Science
in Beijing, China, 26 July 2005
Bruceanthro (talk) 15:59, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Initial Notes compiled to Assist Expand this Article

message: GRASSIE, William J (2005) Biocultural Evolution in the 21st Century: The Evolutionary Role of Religion.  Paper Presented at the XXII International Congress of History of Science
in Beijing, China, 26 July 2005
Bruceanthro (talk) 15:59, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 2005GRASS
Talk:Diesel engine runaway

message: I suggest this article be merged with Overspeed (engine). Biscuittin (talk) 23:25, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

message: Anyone notice that the first sentence of the causes section isn't even a sentence?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.83.48.110 (talk) 00:14, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: First sentence
Template talk:ModernFrenchAFVs

message: Not really used to editing templates, can someone move the Panhard AML from the APC section to the tanks and armoured car section, I've tried and failed. Thanks. KTo288 (talk) 23:27, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: done. Rama (talk) 08:56, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks again. KTo288 (talk) 10:16, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: AML
Talk:Caffè corretto

message: "Caffé corretto": as an Italian, I read this as "corrected coffee", meaning "rectified", rather than "correct", meaning "proper". However, for the latter version there is a source (on which I disagree), and I don't have a source for the former. So I am only proposing, rather than adding myself, this... correction.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.0.123.4 (talk) 08:35, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
Talk:University of Milano-Bicocca

message: The logo depicted is not the real logo of the university but a "version" relative to Science Faculty. The official logo is gray (see ).151.47.213.76 (talk) 23:32, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: There are two videos:
* The one I've tried to link, from youtube of the official youtube group (see banner here, official site in Italian)
* The linked embedded player here, on the official site in English.
Both videos are the same; the latter, however, has much lower resolution, whereas the youtube one has a HQ version.
 
User:XLinkBot XLinkBot has just reverted my edit removing the link from youtube. 
I'll replace it with the second link. --tankmiche feedback? 12:57, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official presentation video 

message: If someone wants to add a note on the university canceling Dostoevsky at the beginning of the Ukraine-Russian war of 2022:
Khaleda Rahman at Newsweek, 2022-03-02: College Backtracks on Banning Teaching Dostoevsky Because He's Russian:
Italian writer Paolo Nori posted a video on Instagram on Tuesday saying he had received an email from officials at the University of Milano-Bicocca, in Milan, informing him of the decision to postpone his course following Russia's invasion of Ukraine. "Dear Professor, the Vice Rector for Didactics has informed me of a decision taken with the rector to postpone the course on Dostoevsky," the email said, according to Nori's video. "This is to avoid any controversy, especially internally, during a time of strong tensions."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by There is a T101 in your kitchen (talk • contribs) 09:01, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canceling Dostoevsky
Talk:HMAS Platypus (naval base)

message: Hi is this the site in Chowder Bay where the navy used to be, I have some pics. Cheers. Ad@m.J.W.C. (talk) 23:38, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Ad@m.J.W.C., no. See coordinates that are now added to this page. The site is in Neutral Bay. I notice that you've uploaded pics of  that relate to the facilities in Chowder Bay. Many thanks. Rangasyd (talk) 13:36, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Site location
Template talk:Pigeon-breed-stub

message: To use the domesticated pigeon breed stub on a pigeon breed article.
 
Simply use 
Best placed at bottom of page when doing your edit.
Sting au Buzz Me... 23:40, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

message: The file :File:Show Racertaube.jpg may be a copy violation. Please look for a new image. --PigeonIP (talk) 19:40, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  new image
Talk:Polycyclic compound

message: Rather than leaving in  without page numbers, I replaced it with a  tag in the lede, and moved this here, posting the note.  A 300 page book without a page number cannot stay in place. Cheers.  Le Prof Leprof 7272 (talk) 19:24, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation moved here as unhelpful in verifiability
Talk:Brooke rifle

message: OK, I'll bite, how is this not suitably referenced? Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:18, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like it does to me. B-Class. — Bellhalla (talk) 22:34, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It certainly is. 155.213.224.59 (talk) 15:06, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
Talk:Ichirō Itano

message: This looks less like a Wiki and more of a promotional page, a lot of paragraphs don't even have any sources. I would expect this from a fansite wiki, but not here. DreamsDreams (talk) 13:06, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is this page completely different from other Animators and Directors?
Talk:Fort Nelson, Hampshire

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 11:07, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 
Talk:Enameled wire

message: Reuse of enamelled wire rarely works. It seems the insulation becomes brittle after use.
Tabby (talk) 23:55, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Recycling is still feasible to recover the copper though. - Neparis (talk) 01:36, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reuse
Talk:Botany Bay (song)

message: Botany Bay is also the title of a song collected in Wiltshire, England in 1898. Perhaps this page can incorporate other versions like this, but I need to do some more research into its origins and relationship to the song that forms the basis for this article. See --Sabrebd (talk) 11:55, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Other versions and songs
Talk:Pewee Valley Confederate Cemetery

message: On both items on the National Register, they have it as Peewee Valley, but the proper spelling of the town is Pewee Valley.  That is why I named the items as such, but kept the extra "e" in the infoboxes.--Bedford 01:37, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Cast zinc Civil War monuments were less expensive than bronze. Was a cast zinc monument cheaper than a marble obelisk?--Wetman (talk) 04:06, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The cemetery is NOT "the site of the old Kentucky Confederate Home".  It is on Maple Avenue a mile away from where the home was and is also a regular active cemetery.  I am not sure how a person can edit the top paragraph, but this should be changed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.28.124.106 (talk) 05:05, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location of Cemetery
Talk:Faliraki

message: How about some history of the place: like, when it was first mentioned and such?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.142.94.195 (talk) 00:09, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 
Talk:Barefoot v. Estelle

message: Hello, I'm not super active when it comes to editing Wikipedia - I tend to make small changes like fixing typos and grammatical errors - and I always edit within the Wikipedia Beta app on Android. Unfortunately, while attempting to correct a dead link on this page, I accidentally made an absolute mess out of not just the citation I was trying to edit but also the preceding citation as well. I think it had something to do with the format of the citation (because I've had success editing citations before when they lead to dead links, but I hadn't dealt with links formatted as dead, etc. within the Wiki page itself). As you can see from the edit history, I've tried numerous times to correct the error - wigging out that I'd made such a horrible mistake. I was hoping there was some way to revert the page back to a previous edit (to right before I touched it and it burst into flames) but I didn't see one - so I'm really hoping someone more experienced than myself knows how. Again, I'm SO sorry. I would keep trying, but at this point I'm genuinely worried I would only make it worse - as that's been the case ever since I first edited the page. As an aside, I wish it to be known that I always copy the text I'm replacing so that I can paste it back in if something goes wrong but this time it just did not work. I must have missed something when I copied or pasted it that broke the link and then, as my attempts to fix the problem grew more frantic, I must have tried to replace the wrong citation and ended up ruining the citation immediately preceding my original screw-up. Again, I cannot apologize enough and believe me when I say I have taken this experience to heart and from now on I will stick to fixing simple typos/grammatical errors - if I ever edit Wikipedia again at all. And thank you in advance to whomever it is that restores the page to its condition before I screwed the pooch. BeepThisIsNotaTest (talk) 08:44, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  I really, really messed up and I am VERY sorry