lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Statute of Westminster 1275

message: The article on Statute of Westminster 1931 says that there was SoW in 1290, in addition to the ones in 1275 & 1285.  Can anybody correct that or add details here? Mdotley 01:20, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important 

message: "Its language now recalls that of Canute or Alfred, now anticipates that of our own day"
Huh?  Norman French recalls the Danish of Cnut or the (West) Saxon of Ælfred?  There's hardly a resemblance.  What is this really supposed to mean?  Or should it be excised?  Groogle 08:43, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: What language?

message: What is the "1327 Statute of Westminster" mentioned in a footnote to this MOD page? Loganberry (Talk) 01:58, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  1327? 

message: In the opening section it says that only chapter 5 is still in force in the UK, but in the table it also says that Chapter 50 is still in force. I can't currently change it myself as I don't know which of these is correct. Fork me (talk) 08:40, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article contradicts itself
Talk:Justice League of America, volume 2

message: This page needs to be merged into the existing article - well I say merge - we need to take about a paragraph or two of this page - most of it is aimed at fan-boys not general readers. --Charlesknight 18:47, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'm happy with that - how do we go about it? --Charlesknight 18:49, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And the Justice League article isn't only about the team either. The Justice League title logistically belongs on the Justice League page. Those titles have their own article because they didn't have their own article. Justice League of America does... the Justice League article. Kusonaga 19:44, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

text: You mean like X-Men, vol. 2? : ) - jc37 19:50, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That was done largely because it became entirely too unwieldy to keep it on the same page, considering the second vol. of X-Men is already nearing #200. JLofA hasn't even hit #12 yet. Kusonaga 20:13, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It would seem to me that this is exactly what the  template is for. Give a synopsis on the JL page, along with the "main" template which links to here. What's the concern? - jc37 20:20, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

text:  The X-men vol.2 article was split off it because too large for the main article and as it stands is a real-world look at the publication history. The contents of this page is a fannish look at issue 0. If and when we can see something interesting to say about the real-world impact of this volume, we can produce a page to describe it. I don't see a need for such a page at the present moment --Charlesknight 20:27, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge. Plus: no detailed plot. 201.37.7.166 23:07, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is past time to merge. —Lesfer (t/c/@) 17:25, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge into existing article
Talk:Perth Rectangular Stadium

message: Just for the sake of the reason behind the requested move, it probably should have been explained by Bongomanrae. Last year there was a discussion on the naming conventions of Australian stadiums which had consensus to use neutral names instead of commercial names (evidence). There was support, but nothing eventuated, until this.  The Windler  talk  09:06, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Move completed due to consensus reached here and [[here.  The Windler  talk  07:51, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: Please ensure that, despite what you call the round ball game, the wikilinks direct to the specific article on the sport - Association football. Hack (talk) 06:33, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Football usage
Talk:Red Line (Baltimore)

message: I added this tag because I feel it is a bit painful on the eyes at the moment.  It could use some organisation and sub-sections.  If I feel up to it, I may eventually do it myself; but I welcome anyone else whom would like to have at it first.  --Thisisbossi 01:29, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup tag 

message: I removed a reference to the Canton Community Association from the "Community Opposition" section. When I used the previously attached link to visit the association's website, I did not find anything expressing an opinion on the Red Line.
If the Canton Community Association actually opposed the Red Line, please add a specific reference before mentioning the association in this article.  I need more than just a link to their index page to verify. Folklore1 (talk) 21:12, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Community Opposition 

message: I was unable to find a source to verify the statement:
"Secretary of Transportation Robert Flanagan had stated that he had no opposition to the original text of the bill, but the text was altered after that statement." I don't think this sentence is important to the article, so I removed it. After all, it's quite common for Senate and House bills to undergo last minute revisions. If you feel the sentence is important, please add source reference before putting it back in the article. Folklore1 (talk) 13:53, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Was looking over this section after seeing the (excellent) new station chart, and I'm wondering if much of it could be chopped out. It's a bit too detailed, and some of the events are now dated and relatively unimportant (such as the bits about the vetoing; Erlich is long out of office) A briefer summary may serve better. oknazevad (talk) 06:43, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maryland General Assembly 

message: A table of "features" in the Fall 2009 Red Line Update states that five of the surface stations will have parking. However, a system map on the same page identifies six stations with parking areas. Folklore1 (talk) 15:47, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I say let's go with the six shown on the map for now; it seems the most comprehensive overview. If there's a change once the plans are more firm, we can change it later. oknazevad (talk) 23:06, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parking 

message: How should we handle the just-announced revival of the line? There's a lot of this page that was rendered moot by the initial line's cancellation. Aresef (talk) 20:36, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revival
Talk:Corridor Cities Transitway

message: to keep the article meaningful in the future and to allow updates, the year of any proposal/plan should be noted if known Deanlaw (talk) 22:49, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: year
Talk:Ralph Bass

message: Of course, to tag properly, a comment should be made on the talk page. An encyclopedia article should spell out things like "rhythm and blues" and "rock and roll" and not abbreviate them as "R&B" or "Rock'n'roll". —Hanuman Das 01:32, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

message: Where are the rules specifying the justification of the "cleanup tag" in this particluar situation. I would appreciate you pointing me in the right direction. Thank you.  Mattisse(talk) 14:55, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Could you point out a reference for me to follow re cleanup tag on article? 
Talk:Conceptual graph

message: I was hoping someone could wander along and answer my question:
What kind of datastructure is normally used to represent a conceptual graph in memory?
I get the impression that it's often a normal production-rules logic representation of some kind, so that the conceptual network is really a bunch of disconnected statements in memory that define a graph as opposed to actually being one (in short, edges aren't pointers).
I tried to look around on some relevant websites, but they seem to concentrate more on the graphs themselves than on their representation in memory.
In cogitant , the internal data structure of a conceptual graph is a graph.
90.41.116.163 (talk) 20:44, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

message: I don't see how this article can fail to mention C.S. Pierce......
Tmusgrove (talk) 00:17, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Pierce should be mentioned but he should be added by someone very familiar with Pierce's work. In the meantime perhaps add a link to Charles Sanders Pierce should be added to the See Also section of the Wiki. Jefferythomas (talk) 19:29, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  I don't understand why you would remove the Sowa references. Peirce should also be mentioned. Jefferythomas (talk) 17:48, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pierce? 

message: I moved the following links from the EL section. Some might make good sources to support article content, but anything else doesn't belong there:
* Uta Priss's table and Arisbe's list (with Wayback Machine links).
* Graph-Based Knowledge Representation (book)
* John F. Sowa - Conceptual Graphs
* 
* University of Aalborg Online Course
* CoGui
* Cogitant
* Formal Concept Analysis, Uta Priss, Napier University, UK.
Jojalozzo 16:32, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  I don't understand why you would remove the Sowa references. Peirce should also be mentioned. Jefferythomas (talk) 17:48, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Excessive external links
Talk:Sandy Collora

message: Notability is certainly asserted, with an impressive list of films. Some of those listed are also listed on IMDB (though not The Crow), although IMDB is not itself a reliable source. Besides this, even IMDB comments that he is uncredited on pretty much everything listed. We need some sources to satisfy WP:V. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 09:51, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Trams in Alexandria

message: Most wikis tell, that the tram started in 1860. German wiki tells 1860 on top, but than for the beginning of service.
Searching for more information, I've found http://www.aawsat.com/details.asp?section=67&article=515102&issueno=11095
Besides an Italian name of a ralway, perhaps the original name of the tram, all the text is in Arab, only.
On top it mentions the year1860, in the text there are "16 July 1860", "1862", "8 January 1863" and "22 July 1863".
Who can translate the text or knows more about the dates?--Ulamm (talk) 11:41, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of opening. 

message: And the track gauge is? Peter Horn User talk 01:26, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: de:Straßenbahn Alexandria and :fr:Tramway d'Alexandrie give 1,435 mm. Peter Horn User talk 01:32, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Track gauge
Talk:List of football clubs in Ukraine

message: The clubs that are listed are only of the professional status. You should add this detail. There are also a lot of amoteur class clubs and a big history of other clubs in the past and even since the independence in 1991.
Aleksandr Grigoryev 01:44, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Herlufsholm School

message: that is a really lame article...
Well write a better one, I was bored one night
:Yeah, really lame... Perhaps you both try to write a good article together. I had to clear one or the other point which should be part of your schools hp and not in Wikipedia.--Kresspahl 18:49, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

message: I have rated this article as Start/High. The school is clearly important, being the oldest boarding school in Denmark and so the "High" rating. With regards to the article content, however, the article is long and quite well written, but is very poorly referenced (there are no inline citations) and as such the article cannot receive higher than "Start" class until this is rectified. TheAuthor22 (talk) 21:08, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WikiProject Schools]] Assessment January 2011

message: What language should this article be written in?  That is to say UK English or US English?  It seems that there is a mixture of both.  It is going to be very hard to tidy this article up - there is too much jargon.  For example, what is 3G and how is anyone, who does not know the school, supposed to know?  Kiltpin (talk) 12:48, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  What language?
Talk:One Grand Central Place

message: 42nd Street, New York, New York is not really ambiguous, but there are two unrelated 42nd Streets in other parts of New York City, and 42nd Street (Manhattan) which is the title of the article about that street, would also be better as the disambiguating part of the title for articles about buildings on the street.
:How about moving this from "Lincoln Building (42nd Street, New York, New York)" to "Lincoln Building (60 East 42nd Street, Manhattan, New York)" then?  Also may as well put in the East and the 2 digit street address number, just to be precise.  I've used street address number as part of some other disambiguating recently, e.g. Londershausen House (309 Main St., Dayton, Oregon), by the way.  Go ahead and move it to whatever name you like;  it is at least now distinguished from the Lincoln Building (1 Union Square, New York, New York) one. doncram (talk) 20:43, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Street number ambiguity 

message: Between 1930, when it opened, and the passage of the Fair Housing Act in 1968, the Lincoln Building was the only office building in midtown and/or downtown where Black professionals could rent office space.  This is something I know as a licensed NYC tour guide.  I don't have a reference to verify. GuyBig (talk) 19:16, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lincoln Building Tenants
Talk:Denis Weaire

message: Rhymes with fear, fare, what? —Tamfang (talk) 03:28, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  pronunciation
Talk:Ihei Kimura

message: Material about Kimura tends to credit him as one of the photographers of Tōkyō sen-kyūhyaku-yonjūgonen, aki but doesn't say who the others were. The chronology of Shunkichi Kikuchi on p.17 of Shashinka wa nani o hyōgen shita ka: 1945–1960 (写真家はなにを表現したか1945～1960, What were photographers expressing: 1945–1960; Tokyo: Konica Plaza, 1991) clearly credits it to Kikuchi and Kimura (and nobody else). -- Hoary 00:17, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: ''Tōkyō sen-kyūhyaku-yonjūgonen, aki''
Talk:Minton's Playhouse

message: What about Jack Kerouac? Kerouac was a Bird follower. He wrote several poems about jazz at Minton's. One is on his spoken word album.
:It is usual to sign and date contributions with four tildes (~) on Wikipedia. 
:Kerouac was a friend of Jerry Newman, responsible for recording those after hours sessions, in the early 1940s when they were both students at Columbia. In any case Parker did not actually perform that much at Minton's, despite the venues importance in the emergence of bebop. Philip Cross 16:20, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: How do you define "that much"? Viriditas (talk) 04:16, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: "Not very often". Philip Cross (talk) 19:57, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Kerouac

message: This article needs updating since Mintons has reopened  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.218.34.111 (talk) 01:23, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mintons Jazz Club 

message: The coordinates send you to a chapel not a bar
The real coordinates are
(40.8047705, -73.9525190) HeresyTheScholar (talk) 12:37, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  The coordinates are wrong
Talk:Trance Gemini

message: I didn't see all the episodes of the last season, but I saw the one where Dylan finds that electronic device (kinda like a portable TV) and says "I'm on Tarn Vedra" Was that the real Tarn Vedra, or is Seefra a copy of one, where were the Vedrans?
And, I don't understand this Avatar of a Star thing either. A star is neither a sentient machine nor a god, which are the two contexts I've heard avatar used in, a representation, as (Rommie is of the Andromeda ship or an avatar of a god like in AD&D games, or hmm, the avatar in  the Ultima series) 
A star is a ball of plasma, a gas, in which the gravity causes nuclear fusion to occur in the center. It doesn't have a brain or a consciousness of any kind. Maybe they mean that it isn't a star in the normal sense.
:The obvious guess would be that in the Andromeda Universe stars are somehow sentient and sometimes create human Avatars to interact with other beings.  Somewhat reminescent of both Astrology and the Gaia myth, come to think of it. Luis Dantas 17:31, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Myth is not logical, not in that sense.  I agree that these concepts resemble those of Shinto. Luis Dantas 17:31, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Confused About Her (last season spoilers)

message: More than just the description of the physical transformation, perhaps a before and after comparison image would be worth including here. Mrobviousjosh 18:14, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Transformation

message: When she switched places with her "future self" and such, what... why... ah, this is confusing. My question is: why was she golden in the future and purple in the past, and what really happened to her "Purple" self? Xavius, the Satyr Lord (talk) 11:07, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Also Confused About Her
Talk:Suri, Birbhum

message: * Those who are interested in developing this page are requested to follow the norms laid down in Wikipedia:WikiProject India/Cities. Please provide a proper reference or source of whatever you add to this page, in order that others can verify the facts from that reference. -- P.K.Niyogi 02:15, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Guideline

message: He is considered as the most brilliant person of a small town named siuri. through out his academic career he has outperformed in his studies, topped in every position and currently working as a scientist in a research firm (name not disclosed).
details added by sajid  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 221.135.150.115 (talk) 17:37, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  sammi ul haque
Talk:Ajax (cleaning product)

message: The PD sheet warnings do not seem encyclopedic to me. -- Phuongj 02:24, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I removed that.  Pasting data sheets into an encyclopedia article isn't appropriate. --Delirium 02:16, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Is it appropriate to write articles on individual, branded products at all? Would this information not be more appropriate in a generic article on powdered cleansers? 71.198.65.9 00:47, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  "Floats the dirt, right down the drain/Bum-Bum-Bum-Bum-Bum-Bum-Bum". Is it just me or does anyone else get irrationally happy that there's a wikipedia entry with the phrase "Bum-Bum-Bum-Bum-Bum-Bum-Bum" in it. stib (talk) 03:06, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: As the jingle's only claim to notability was being the first TV jingle, and this was tagged as uncited for 19 months, I removed it. - Fayenatic (talk) 17:05, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Encyclopedic?

message: Removed this line:
The name Ajax may also reference an old British name for toilet, "the jakes".If Walls Could Talk, BBC Four documentary programme, 9 p.m., 20 April 2011. Looking at the evolution of the British bathroom down the years, Dr Lucy Worsley stated that the name 'Ajax' derived from "the jakes". 
The statement appears at 19 minutes into the program, which is on the web at http://www.dailymotion.com/video/k71HE5b6Ftsd4o3ry91 . However, the speaker was not discussing the cleaning product; rather the topic was a Tudor-era flush toilet. --Bistropha (talk) 04:32, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cut speculative line 

message: Was the original slogan not "Ajax - stronger than grease"? "Stronger than dirt" makes no sense in terms of classical mythology. 2A0A:A543:D6B3:0:B4A2:9A03:5BB4:E8EE (talk) 16:12, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for pointing this out. After some digging, I've expanded the section. Rupumped (talk) 20:32, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stronger than dirt/grease
Talk:Academy at Charlemont

message: According to the Princeton University page, their alma mater is not "Viva Academia" but is instead "Old Nassua":
"Old Nassau, Princeton's alma mater since 1859, with words by then-freshman Harlan Page Peck and music by Karl A. Langlotz. Before the Langlotz tune was written, the song was sung to the melody of "The Star-Spangled Banner", which also fits. The text of Old Nassau is available from Wikisource."
I cannot find any reference to "viva academia" from a google search (search clause: ""viva academy" ("alma mater" OR "school song")"). So, someone should double-check this attribution to Princeton.--P Todd 02:30, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like this issue is closed as the section has been modified.--P Todd 02:47, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Viva Academia and Princeton?
Talk:Glove compartment

message: Does this article actually serve the public? does it explain or educate a reader with regards to a pretty self-evident object? i may be wrong here, but thats the beauty of opinion. Jonomacdrones 02:29, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Pen and Paper Clip are both rather self-evident... Ahanix1989 20:41, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article purpose

message: I've lived in Seattle for almost twenty years, and I don't ever recall hearing the term "jockey box" for referring to a glove compartment. 24.41.51.199 03:06, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Jockey what?

message: "A few modern cars contain knee airbags on the passenger side, which may block the glove compartment in the event of a collision, rendering it and its contents inaccessible until the airbag has deflated sufficiently to be moved."
This is nonsense.   Airbags deflate within a second of being deployed.Eregli bob (talk) 07:35, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious statement
Talk:Reduction

message: Jthekid15 (talk) 08:36, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can The Definition on this page be extenended? 

message: I’m not convinced that Reduction (cooking) should be reduced to "other uses" at the bottom of the page.  I’m guessing that its importance justifies increased visibility towards the top. Viriditas (talk) 08:24, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reduction (cooking)
Talk:Assume good faith

message: I'm moving this redirect to Wikipedia:Assume good faith instead of Good faith. There are somewhere around 129 links to this page, all of which are from User pages, article Talk pages, or other Wikipedia "administrative" pages (Afd's, nominations, etc.); it can't be reasonably assumed that people typed assume good faith and were referencing the Good faith article.—Chidom talk  02:35, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I really think that it should direct to good faith and will change it as such.  This page could legitimately come up in a search for the article.  Furthermore, [ this search] indicates that every other "assume good faith"-related redirect (except those prefixed with "WP:") redirects to good faith.  --Iamunknown 23:59, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changing target of redirect
Talk:Mole Valley

message: Information needs adding underneath the 'Individuals' sub-title in the article as it is empty. Xboxsponge15 (talk) 12:10, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Information needs adding under the 'Individuals' sub-title on a section in the article