lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Les Munro

message: , , , , ,  .  Into The Fray T/C 00:42, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm done.  If someone else is watching and wants to add to it, have at it! :) Into The Fray T/C 01:26, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some sources 

message: For a long time the article has stated that after their aircraft was hit by flak, the crew voted on whether or not to continue on the raid, and decided to return home. Unreferenced of course. On the stuff.co.nz site today there is a story entitled "Dambuster myth debunked in final weeks of surviving members life", in which it states that Munro was determined to put that story to rest before he died. Munro said that not only did a vote not take place, but it could not have taken place because all communications were knocked out. He said it was his dicision to return, and he sent a note back to the crew to tell them what was going on. The interesting story is here. I removed the bit from the article. Moriori (talk) 03:46, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting. I reckon that the fact that the "vote" was a myth, and that is was well-known, is worth adding to the article, now that we've got a reliable source for this. Thoughts? Schwede66 05:37, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. It will also help avoid future editors adding it back in as "truth", which may well happen given how well known the myth is. QuiteUnusual (talk) 08:05, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: The vote which wasn't
Talk:List of canal aqueducts in the United Kingdom

message: This list has been transferred here from Canals of Great Britain. My plan is to do similar for all lists on that page to make it more readable. I think this page should ultimately list all aqueducts, even if they don't have a WP article. There can't be that many can there? I also think that each one should have the following information-
aqueduct name, canal name, status (navigable, derelict, demolished etc), coordinates.
Derek Andrews 00:46, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Before considering listing all canal aqueducts (and there are two dozen named ones in Birmingham alone) you would have to define aqueduct. Would you count a canal going over a stream? Over a footpath? Or only those given a name, and by whom? Even some of the named ones are little more than a large culvert. I think it best to stick to those notable enough to have an article. There are still plenty more that are worthy of being added as articles, e.g. those with listed building status.--Shantavira|feed me 13:21, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Background and plan

message: I've added coordinates to, and moved images into, the table. Please fill in the gaps, and remember to then add the same to the individual articles. Thank you.Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 16:14, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Images and coordinates needed

message: Should Murtry aqueduct have an entry on this list. It doesn't have an article yet. It is at Great Elm, built around 1795, carried the Dorset and Somerset Canal over the river.
:No, in common with many Wikipedia lists, this article is restricted to aqueducts with articles.--Shantavira|feed me 18:55, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Murty aqueduct
Talk:Der Protagonist

message: What is the basis of the 2002 date given in the article? I have the CD, and it clearly gives a copyright date of 2001, though it does not state a precise date for the recording sessions. - Jmabel | Talk 21:11, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: AllMusic gives that date: . // PS: a  doesn't work when it's later added; see  WP:TP#Notifying other users. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 03:14, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of Berlin German Symphony Orchestra recording
Talk:The One (video)

message: I.e. is it "authorised", or is it just something CBS put together without his consent? I would assume it's authorized or it would say it wasn't on the cover, but this should be verified and explained in the article (The Elfoid (talk) 01:23, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's defo legitimate, the RIAA have certified it gold, and it's labeled as a Michael Jackson product. I've often thought of nominating it for deletion, but it won't be deleted if it's been certified. — Realist2 02:00, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Should specify that it's authorised, then.
*Usable info — Realist2 20:29, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: is this actually an official MJ release? 

message: I'd say this article was worthless without at least mentioning the content of the video. Considering that most people don't know what the CBS special is, it's important to describe what is (or isn't) included, beyond a one-word "Genre" in the infobox.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.141.18.226 (talk) 17:52, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content!
Talk:Volunteers of America

message: 128.135.73.105 (talk) 15:45, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite

message: The Volunteers of America, like the Salvation Army, is both a service organization and a church.
This entry needs further explanation of the VoA as a church: beliefs, governance and such.LAWinans (talk) 23:49, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Focus on Church

message: Hello Wikipedians, 
I have just made several edits and rewritten significant portions of this article in order to address the problems mentioned above. I believe the article no longer reads like an advertisement and is comparable to similar types of articles here on Wikipedia. I have also added several references and a section on Ministry. I would like to remove the flags at the top of the article based on these changes if there are no objections. Thank you! Rmlewinson (talk) 02:31, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Substantial Edits Made
Talk:Las Gallinas, California

message: are you sure it is in San Rafael, the USGS maps seem to make it appear to be an unincorporated area near San Rafael in the Las Gallinas Valley (LGV) were some portions of the geographic feature of the LGV are in San Rafael others are unincorporated. Any way to make sure?CholgatalK! 01:14, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: in san rafael?
Talk:Pleurococcus

message: Pelagibacter ubique and allies are about 1000 times more numerous. It's not obvious what clade Pleurococcus should be compared with (nor that "most numerous organism" should be applied to a genus rather than a species), but it seems to me that it is almost certain that some subgroup of the Pelagibacter ubique outnumbers it. Lavateraguy (talk) 17:26, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Most abundant organism? 

message: Dogs 199.7.156.251 (talk) 17:09, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  white shepherd
Talk:Truphone

message: This article doesn't seem to be very neutral. Several sections are copied and pasted from the company's web site. I'm flagging the article as potentially non neutral and in need of cleanup. I don't have time to clean up the article myself right now.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chmac (talk • contribs) 20:55, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality 
Talk:Facilitating payment

message: While reading the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act article I noticed that "grease payment" was not wikilinked and not even red-linked anywhere in wikipedia. Quite surprising, if you notice that "facilitating payments" has a whooping half-thou Google Books hits, not to say tens of thous regular google hits. Laudak 01:52, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article life
Talk:Ginjo Thakurgaon

message: I stumbled upon this page - a place where I had lived from August, 1975 until March, 1977 while I was posted here as the first manager of my bank's branch's there :) --Bhadani (talk) 14:49, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reminiscences

message: with Jharkhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Jharkhand or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:19, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Jharkhand workgroup Addition
Talk:Hollow Fields

message: I know this only seems like a minor story to write about, but if you ask me, Hollow Fields does have quite a lot of characters. I think we need a character page so that the main page is not extended. Sakurablossoms02 (talk) 19:20, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Character Page

message: Putting reviews and other stuff here.
*Best New OEL Manga About.com
*Interview w/ author About.com
*Vol.1 PopCultureShock
*Mania Vol.2
*Mania Vol.1
*AICN Vol.1
*Active Anime
*Mangacritic
:Kaguya-chan (talk) 15:32, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reviews 
Talk:List of postal codes of Canada: T

message: T0J 2V0 is listed as Rosedale Station in Canada Post's data lookups. 161.69.121.34 (talk) 15:07, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  T0J 2V0 Rosedale Station (Rosedale)
Talk:David M. Spindel

message: This is a new page; a work in progress.  Will be adding to the article in the next few days.... Hotcop2 02:22, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

message: He has a Wikipedia page.  One of the world's finest. Sixstring1965 02:37, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  About Time
Talk:USS Saugus (1863)

message: Original text was short (only several paragraphs). Added much more additional text from DANFS, retained the shipinfobox which had additional information in it (see ref), added intro paragraph to describe scope of ship's career, added See Also, cat, minor edits, etc. Wikited (talk) 23:31, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Upgraded page
Talk:Postal village

message: Which country or countries does this article related to?  Bermicourt (talk) 18:27, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: "Post village" seems to be largely American; "postal village" seems mostly Australian though it sees some US usage as well. Mangoe (talk) 04:40, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  I was able to turn up some stray Canadian uses of "post village" as well. Hog Farm  Talk 05:08, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Region? 

message: The actual substance of this article is completely uncited, and given US postal practices of the time, I'm not convinced it's accurate, or for that matter, that people in different countries meant the same thing by it. The two citations are merely for the definition of abbreviations, but I have not found in either work where they define the term. Nor have I found any place else that does. And in the US, it was a common practice before RFD to put a post office in a train station, a store, or even a room in someone's house. These all had names as if they were towns, but there was no town per se there. Given a lack of a contrary definition, it could just as well be that a "post village" in the US was such a 4th class office and therefore not a town. Likewise, it is entirely possible that the compilers of these works could not distinguish between post offices that were in towns and those that were not. At any rate, we need a source with a definition. Mangoe (talk) 04:40, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I have tried everything I can think of, and I can find no source providing a clear-cut definition of this term.  Tellingly, one of those late-19th century lists of places that the term often appears in I found to also list "post-hamlet", "post-borough", and "post-township" separately.  Right now, I'm not convinced that this term has a set definition.  Stuff in the article such as  is almost certainly original research.  The article as written is almost certainly US-centric, as the term is in reasonably heavy use for non-US places.
Unless someone can find a source nailing down a definition for this, at least for the US, I'm inclined to think that this is an amorphous term meaning anything from an actual village to an undefined rural area where there happened to be a post office in the area. Hog Farm  Talk 05:08, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

text: This is similar to the UK concept of a "post town" which is part of the system used by the Royal Mail to deliver post. So if postal village is or was used in this way, then the article should be kept, but make much clearer what it means or meant in which postal system. Bermicourt (talk) 09:19, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accuracy
Talk:Posten Bring

message: The picture in the article used as an example is an example of the way the post offices _used_ to work.
These days, you usually don't get any regional offices. Almost all mail is delivered and handled by grocery-store-workers.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.101.248.229 (talk) 13:05, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That these kind of post offices are becoming less and less typical, is true. Especially in rural areas. That most mail is handled and delivered by grocery-store-workers is not true. Ters (talk) 20:13, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Old posts

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 10:59, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Posten Norge →  – Posten Norge has changed it's company name to Posten Bring (https://www.mynewsdesk.com/no/posten-bring/pressreleases/posten-norge-as-is-changing-its-name-to-posten-bring-as-3259324) Souticel (talk) 19:41, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  this seems ok though "mynewsdesk" is not considered a reliable source for us. I can't find another source other than the organisation itself. ww2censor (talk) 11:13, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 18 September 2023
Talk:Postal service privatization

message: Apparently the reference to Murray Rothbard is politically motivated, and verges on an advertisement for Libertarian ideologues. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.123.140.199 (talk • contribs)  18:07, 27 July 2011
:Are you suggesting the statement is untrue. It is properly sourced. ww2censor (talk) 00:27, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think it's in doubt whether or not this is an accurate quote, rather the issue is whether it is appropriate to include a single person's opinion in this way. RitKill (talk) 20:20, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: What would be the guidelines-based argument against its inclusion? - Keith D. Tyler ¶ 04:41, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Murray Rothbard

message: Could someone maybe try updating this, so it's not nine years out of date and incomplete (ever heard of the Netherlands?). What's the point of an online encyclopedia if articles like this remain to remind us of the bad old days of paper encyclopedias?!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.197.170.130 (talk) 21:14, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your suggestion. When you believe an article needs improvement, please feel free to change it.  We encourage you to be bold in updating pages, because wikis like ours develop faster when everybody edits. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. You can always preview your edits before you publish them or test them out in the sandbox. If you need additional help, check out our getting started page or ask the friendly folks at the Teahouse.  . Keith D. Tyler ¶ 04:40, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is pretty useless unless ...
Talk:Postage stamps and postal history of Indochina

message: :Image:Stamp Indoch Garnier-300px.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
— Save_Us † 09:50, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Stamp Indoch Garnier-300px.jpg
Talk:Correos de México

message: I am trying to expand this article, first in Spanish and then translating it into English. It is about researching and finding the historical data for an institution that is almost 5 centuries old. It is an institution that is currently functioning, so I will place the entire historical part at the end of the article, as I have done in Spanish.
--Fittipaldi92 (talk) 17:58, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extension and historical development of the article
Talk:Postage stamps and postal history of Russia

message: Can someone translate the 'Postage Stamps' section into English please? I have no idea whatsoever what a sentence like "New drawing first Russian postage stamp rectangular created senior engraver EZGB FM Kepler and handed it to the October 21, 1856." means.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.244.155.249 (talk) 18:21, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Language! 

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Mkativerata (talk) 11:39, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem 

message: I completely agree with the above comments. The article looks weird from different points of view. I tried to restructure and edit the article but don't see if these edits improve it a lot. Taking into account all these issues and a huge size of information covered by the current article, I would suggest to split the article and create two separate articles: Postal history of Russia (this is at the moment a redirect) and Postage stamps of Russia. This split would enable appropriate further cleanup and editing of the two new articles. --Michael Romanov (talk) 11:31, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: This would be great. Gone Postal (talk) 19:58, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article split needed
Talk:USS Persistent (MSO-491)

message: She was sold to Spain in August 1972 not 1974, I was the XO at turnover, having been the Chief Engineer for its last deployment to SE Asia. 2600:4040:75DF:3E00:5863:44B7:C580:6CAE (talk) 18:29, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sale to  Spain
Talk:USS Sturdy (PC-460)

message: USS Sturdy (PC-460) rammed USS S-44 (SS-155) 24 january 1942, only 3 of the submarines crew survived. 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_S-26_%28SS-131%29  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.209.26.166 (talk) 03:44, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:United States Postal Service creed

message: The brief "context" is well beyond the limits of OR. Please get a reliable source that establishes the connection. If you an experienced editor, then please know this is right. If you are new, please read our policies on original research.
Likewise, peacock terms like "soaring anthem" are to be avoided. This might be true, but it is irrelevant. This is not a page about the song. And even then it would have to be cited. Thanks! --Cerejota (talk) 04:52, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  removed OR and peackock terms 

message: I haven't seen the movie since I was really young, but in Dumbo I think there's a variation: "Neither rain, nor snow, nor sleet not hail will stop the US mail!" or something like that.  Like I said, I haven't seen the movie in years, so I could be wrong.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.26.194.190 (talk) 16:02, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Variation 

message: Was there another commercial on TV referencing this? I thought I used to see a commercial that showed the creed as text... it involved the USPS cycling team from the late 90s / early 2000s. Crusty wallace (talk) 02:02, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: There used to be a separate section but it was removed here and then here. -17:56, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Popular culture 

message: I don't think replacing the lede with the a duplicate of the quote is a good idea. You should revert it. ww2censor (talk) 18:07, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I tried to fix it now, so there's only one copy of the quote. But if it's not to your taste, you can go ahead and revert it all. --Uncle Ed (talk) 18:30, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent move around

message: Do any of the sources call it a creed? I can't see that they do. The USPS page calls it a motto. Marnanel (talk) 06:47, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I would definitely not take the USPS's own website as a reliable source. (Not kidding in saying this.) EEng 06:57, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Creed"
Talk:Postage stamps and postal history of Vatican City

message: I reverted the name back to the original format: "Postage stamps and postal history of XX". This is the naming format used for stamp and postal history articles throughout this wiki and complies with the other articles of the same type within the Philately WikiProject. See :Category:Postage stamps by country. ww2censor (talk) 14:47, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Page name revert
Talk:Lactivism

message: Bravo, good start on the lactivism page.  Makes me interested in the history of lactivism, such as, I wonder when the first "nurse-in" was?--I'm Nonpartisan 03:01, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: — Assignment last updated by Kalijaye77 (talk) 00:27, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: i think you should go ahead and change this language! DrHeller (talk) 19:55, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: WGS 300w Feminist Theories
Talk:Postage stamps and postal history of Mexico

message: Can anyone clear up (with references) the date of the first hand stamped postmarks?  See Colonial period section. Gracias Ecphora (talk) 15:51, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I received information from a Mexican stamp group which has been incorporated into the article. Ecphora (talk) 00:25, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Earliest hand stamped postmarks? 
Talk:Hurricane Lorenzo (2007)

message: It appears that the track map has been made with 3-hour updates instead of 6-hour. This disenfranchises the actual speed of its intensification, as normal maps are made with 6-hour updates. 72.205.60.115 22:06, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope it uses only the data from the TCR, which is 6-hourly. --Ajm81 22:02, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Track map 