Talk:Timeline of Romani history

message: *c. 1000: Roma recorded in the Byzantine Empire. - i'm very curious to know what are the earliest documents refering to the Tsigani/Gypsy/Gitanes/Rom/Sinti people, using the term Roma... what document, what author, what year ? Criztu 00:55, 4 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Byzantine Empire

message: Roma people has been nominated to be improved on the Improvement Drive. Support this article with your vote and help us improve it to featured status!--Fenice 10:30, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:Article Improvement Drive|Improvement Drive]]

message: I am proposing that this article and the History of the Roma people be combined. Comments?  Wachholder0 14:54, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it could fit entirely into the article. Just copy+paste it under Timeline of Roma history section name. Lajbi Holla @ meWho's the boss? 15:07, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger

message: Unfortunately, I had to tag History of the Roma people/Timeline for copyright violation. The complete list is, however, still available in the articles' history:  and on these websites:  Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 10:27, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it is a rash speculation. This list is not the same as the one in the archive or neither in the external links. They are much longer and don't include the last two date entries (that were unfortunately written by me). Lajbi Holla @ meWho's the boss? 10:42, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you are confused. This message was just a notification that I had put up History of the Roma people/Timeline for a copyvio, NOT Timeline of Roma history (which is indeed a different list, but also a different article). I just put it here, because it is a related page, the information of which might be usefull to expand this article. Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 15:12, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok. My bad. Lajbi Holla @ meWho's the boss? 15:17, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio 

message: Hi!
Has any of the editors of this page seen this link?
It suggests an alternate timeline and seems to include at least some research.
I must admit I am too ignorant on this subject to understand which view has more merit. I thought I read that there was DNA evidence to support the India Origin, is this true?
Dindenver 19:33, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bizarre question 

message: The series of dates could use citations...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.232.200.122 (talk) 10:42, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation needed 

message: "the first morphological study aiming to collect all the dialects of Romani language throughout Europe and dealing with their coherency" ... "the first" "to aim" "is now completed" ? - Anyone know what is correct? Did they succeed? and can we supply a working ref? Victuallers (talk) 16:21, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Bad link for Manchester Uni

message: Czech rhymed Chronicle of Dalimil mentions for the year 1242 arrival of people he calls “Kartasi” because they begged for food saying “Kartas boh” which is supposed to mean “We are hungry”. The mention is rather unsympathetic, because they are accused to be spies for later arriving Tatar [in fact, Mongol] invasion. Discussion whether these were first Gypsies arriving to the Central Europe and the question is still open. (in Czech “Historie Romů na území České republiky” (History of Roma in the area of the Czech Republic) Czech radio, 12-02-2002).
Ceplm (talk) 23:07, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mention of (possibly) Roma in 1242 by Dalimil