Talk:Chris Farley

message: Saying that Phil Hartman "also met a tgragic end" preserves a relevance to the added lin and information, whereas merely stating that he was "killed by his wife" makes it seem like a random non sequitur  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.73.34.109 (talk) 14:42, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Maintain relevanc e

message: I'm not experienced with editing Wikipedia pages, but I logged on to find information about Chris's death and was dismayed to see that the page has recently been vandalized.  All of the information about his death has been changed to refer to "global warming" as the cause of death, etc.  If anyone who knows how could revert the page to reflect factual information, I would appreciate it.  It is a shame that people have nothing better to do on the internet than disrespect a sadly deceased entertainer.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.52.99.61 (talk) 04:57, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism

message: Farley attended school at Edgewood College in Madison, Wisconsin and is buried in a cemetery in that city.  I want to add this info, but lack a source.  Any help?--Hraefen 16:03, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Early life etc.

message: Why is his social security number on this page? Puglet 10:48, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Where? --Asbl 19:19, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Under his picture - I also have wondered about it (It was added on 2006-07-28 03:56:43) --Brat32 21:18, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Doesn't belong there. I removed it immediately. --Asbl 21:21, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Social Security number 

message: The heck? It says he died in '97, but it also says he starred in two '98 movies! --Pikolas 17:46, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *Just means the movies first appeared in theatres in '98, filming was probably done in '97 (Farley died late in that year) -- Rpvdk 23:08, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Dates

message: There must be an estate of some size. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 209.206.165.32 (talk) 05:11, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Will his son have a trustfund?

message: A while ago, I somewhat reluctantly looked at the photos taken at the scene of Chris Farley's death (I still have them saved in a folder). I couldn't help but notice that he's holding what appear to be rosary beads in his left hand. This makes me wonder if he took the fatal dose purposely? --or did he begin to pray after realizing he was in trouble? There's no mention of this very significant and touching fact in the article, which has particular relevance as it relates to his Catholicism and his struggle with drug & alcohol addiction. Any thoughts from those who have contributed thus far? --MrEguy  |  ♠♥♣♦ 22:50, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Holding the Rosary

message: :Image:Farley.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:50, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Farley.jpg

message: It is entirely possible that Farley obtained morphine "off the streets" and it's most likely that he did just that, just like someone would be able to obtain heroin off the streets. Morphine is a very powerful opiate analgesic, and is, according to DAWN (Drug Abuse Warning Network)[], the #1 most sought after narcotic analgesic by opioid addicted individuals, after heroin. Demand and supply for morphine oral solutions, ampules (for injection), and pills remain high in many cities across the United States, including Chicago, where Farley was found dead. According to DEA reports and statistics[], morphine is readily available on the streets of Los Angeles, Chicago, Atlanta, Detroit, Baltimore, and Miami. So the arguement that, "If he didn't have a prescription for pain drugs, he likely did use heroin" is absurd because it is quite obvious that morphine is readily available on the streets (especially in Chicago and Los Angeles, according to the DEA), and as we all know, in the black market, prescriptions are not needed. This has been made clear by the DEA and DAWN. Furthermore, autopsy reports suggest morphine was the substance that killed Farley.  
Though, admittedly, morphine and "heroin" are essentially the same drug. In a nutshell, heroin is simply a faster acting form of morphine and studies[] show the two to be indistinguishable. In a study comparing the physiological and subjective effects of heroin and morphine administered intravenously in post-addicts, the post-addicts showed no preference for one or the other of these drugs when administered on a single injection basis. Doses of these drugs had identical action time courses when administered intravenously, and on this basis there was no difference in their ability to produce feelings of "euphoria," ambition, nervousness, relaxation, drowsiness, or sleepiness;(W. R. Martin 1 and H. F. Fraser 1).
Morphine and heroin were also compared to other narcotic analgesics, and both, morphine sulfate and diamorphine hydrochloride produced superior feelings of "euphoria", and other subjective effects when compared to four other opioid analgesics through intravenous administration. The narcotics compared to heroin and morphinne were, hydromorphone (Dilaudid®), meperidine (Demerol®), oxycodone (OxyContin®; Percocet®), and fentanyl (Duragesic®). While both diamorphine HCL and morphine sulfate were proven to be superior euphoriants to all the four opioids they were compared to in in the study. When intravenously compared to diamorphine HCL and morphine sulfate, fentanyl scored the lowest as a euphoriant, while hydromorphone scored the highest, following hydrmorphone was meperidine and then oxycodone. It should be noted that this was a limited study, and several other highly potent narcotics, such as oxymorphone (Opana®), levorphanol (Levo-Dromoran®), and nicomorphine (Vilan®) were not part of the study. The purpose of the study was to get a general idea of the varying degrees of dependence liability of different narcotics often used in severe pain management.  (National Institute of Mental Health, Addiction Research Center, U. S. Public Health Service Hospital, Lexington, Kentucky. (Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 133, Issue 3, 388-399, 1961)  
The heroin abstinence syndrome was of slightly shorter duration than that of morphine (due to quicker onset of action as a result of the acetyl groups), but the peak intensity was identical for both and withdrawal symptoms were also identical. This suggests that heroin exists only externally, and that "heroin" is only a slightly altered or processed morphine, even described as designer morphine, though it is a pro-drug - basically meaning that "heroin" (which in reality, does not exist and it is in fact, an inactive substance) is just a vehicle which delivers morphine, which by contrast is an highly potent naturally occuring opiate drug to the brain at a slightly more rapid rate. This is so because the "heroin molecule" is morphine with acetyl groups added through acetylation of the morphine molecule (hence, diacetylmorphine) - the acetyl groups allow morphine to cross the blood-brain barrier slightly quicker than morphine on its own. In vivo, the acetyl groups are detached and pure morphine is yielded, producing analgesia, sedation, euphoria, nausea and vomiting, respiratory depression, physical dependence, constipation, miosis and other common morphine side effects. This is also true of codeine (methylmorphine), only with codeine, the morphine is weakened by methylation, and as such the bioavailability of codeine is significantly increased. 
What this shows is that morphine and heroin are almost identical, it's a very interesting study. So Farley could have taken either heroin or morphine, it doesn't matter because scientists say they are basically the same drug. All opioids are similar, but heroin/morphine/codeine (and especially morphine and heroin) have a very special relationship and are very closely related to each other, moreso than any other narcotic analgesics. TheGoodSon 6:55, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm tempted to remove this on the grounds of either original research or wiki is not a forum, but while I consider, I'll riposte with that even when people abuse prescription drugs they do not do so with the intent of killing themselves - suicide notwithstanding - therefore the term "accidental overdose" is perfectly valid.  Chaheel Riens (talk) 14:17, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding his death - "If he didn't have a prescription for pain drugs, he likely did use heroin" - wrong 

message: The article says that John Belushi died of an accidental overdose. If you are following the instructions on legal medications, then there is no such thing. When you abuse any sort of drugs, there is no such thing as an accident. People who use narcotics do so on purpose. 173.86.10.229 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 04:20, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm tempted to remove this on the grounds of either original research or wiki is not a forum, but while I consider, I'll riposte with that even when people abuse prescription drugs they do not do so with the intent of killing themselves - suicide notwithstanding - therefore the term "accidental overdose" is perfectly valid.  Chaheel Riens (talk) 14:17, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Accidental Overdose

message: is there a reason that tag is still on the page? i'm not sure what is unsourced in the article anymore...otherwise i'd fix it... Bouncehoper 17:08, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: unsourced??

message: :Image:Chrisfarley.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 06:55, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair use rationale has been added to the image. Rpvdk (talk) 11:22, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Chrisfarley.jpg

message: The link to tvdance.com seems unprofessional to me.  Mind if I take it out? Mr. Basso (talk) 23:50, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: tvdance link

message: Several times in the last few days, an image of Farley's corpse after his drug overdose has been added to the article. Another editor previously removed it and I've removed it again today. Although it's not particularly graphic, I don't think it's in good taste or of encyclopedic value. Image can be seen here:   - 
Editors, please give your opinion.
(Also, the license of the image is wrong not to mention it has an address to another website on it) --  Rpvdk (talk) 22:07, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I totally agree with removing it. The picture is from Findadeath (obviously) and aside from the copyright issues, question of permission, etc, it adds nothing extra to the article. I can't think of one article that has someone's death picture on it and I don't think Farley's needs to be the first. Pinkadelica 01:56, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've removed an external link to more of the same pictures. Don't think that's the sort of stuff we should be linking to from an encyclopedic article, for the same reasons. Rpvdk (talk) 20:23, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image of Farley's corpse 

message: The DVD release of the original Shrek film includes early rendering footage featuring the original concept for Shrek's voice (before Mike Myers came in and made him Scottish). I think these might be recordings of Chris Farley playing the character. Someone needs to confirm via a source, but it is worth adding to the article if indeed Farley's original recordings as Shrek can be heard on the DVD. This assumes he ever got around to actually doing any recordings, of course. 68.146.80.110 (talk) 15:26, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Shrek voice work (on DVD) and elsewhere

message: As listed else where in the article (the top, the photo of the tombstone) and also imdb.com, Farley's date of death is December 18, 1997, not September 18, 1998.  I'm unfamiliar with editing this section of wikipedia and so i'll leave it to others to correct this.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.254.63.5 (talk) 16:17, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  The statistics rectangle has the wrong death date 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Chris Farley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090818015306/http://www.onlineathens.com:80/1997/122497/1224.a3farley.html to http://www.onlineathens.com/1997/122497/1224.a3farley.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:02, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Chris Farley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090424071147/http://www.thechrisfarleyshow.com/chicago.html to http://www.thechrisfarleyshow.com/chicago.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130104220519/http://www.marquette.edu/about/allfamous.shtml to http://www.marquette.edu/about/allfamous.shtml
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090307052530/http://www.thebiographychannel.co.uk/biography_story/557%3A166/1/Chris_Farley.htm to http://www.thebiographychannel.co.uk/biography_story/557%3A166/1/Chris_Farley.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:44, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:52, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion