lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Lists of film remakes

message: I don't generally make it a habit of trashing the work of others.  Having said that, this thing is potentially useful but as it stands now, it's a nightmare.  Come on, folks, this is on computers; "little" things matter.  For example, it's The Cabinet of Dr Caligari, not Cabinet of Dr Caligari, The Creature from the Black Lagoon, not Creature from the Black Lagoon.  Also, in English all significant words in a title are capitalized, not just the first two like in French, but conjunctions and prepositions are not capitalized.  The failure to adhere to this is one of the main reasons that there are so many redlinks; for something to link properly, it has to link to the exact title unless someone has created a redirect. The markup was/is atrocious, also.  I've straightened out (somewhat) "A", "B", and "C", but don't have all the time required to the rest of the alphabet, and may not for a while. It would be nice for somebody to see the value potential here and go on with what I've started.   Rlquall 03:10, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed!  I've been trying to tidy some of this up.  I'll remove anything that currently doesn't have a Wikipedia entry (either as the original film, or the remake version).  Lugnuts 15:16, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:   All updated. Lugnuts 12:46, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Didn't realise there was a page for them, HalJor.  I've added the See Also at the bottom of the page and I'll remove the TV entries. Lugnuts 09:04, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  What a mess this is! 

message: Wiki's remake page indicates that a film remake uses another film as its source material, there are a large number of entries that are based on previously adapted material.  Among a very long list...300, Zodiac (both of which I removed), Emma, The Bourne Identity, Casino Royale...are these worthy of inclusion?  Me, I say no.  --Toquinha 14:15, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are some of these TRULY remakes? 

message: I made a point of removing 300 and Zodiac as those films are not remakes, but they are based on the same non-film material.  For example, in the case of the recent 300 film by Zack Snider, it's based on the Frank Miller graphic novel.--Toquinha 14:07, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed Items 

message: All The C's have gone down to the D section. How do I put them back in their rightful place?!?
:It appears AlbertSM is doing a bunch of editing and may have made a typo (which he has now fixed); the "C"s are back!
:Atlant 16:33, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Disappearing While Editing

message: The original is in the first column, and where the original and remake have different names, it is found under the original title. As it's a list of remakes, not films of which there have been remakes, would it be more useful to list under the remake's name? Peter James (talk) 22:13, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alphabetical order
Talk:Jump blues

message: I suggest to include in the Jump blues page :
the names of T-Bone Walker, Roy Milton, Tiny Bradshaw, and even Little Richard and B.B. King
I have made an overview
Guitar Electric   Solo-Guitarist     Singer       Song       Writer/Composer
                  
1931 Rickenbacker
1932
1933              T-Bone Walker      T-Bone Walker
etc
1941              Memphis Minnie  etc
etc
1953                                 Roy Brown    Boogie Woogie Blues
etc
1955              Chuck Berry        Chuck Berry  Johnny B. Goode based on Memphis Minnie         Based on Boogie Woogie Blues
etc
etc
I would like to send the paper copy of the page to you or somebody who can discuss it, make it better
Bob Zijlstra, Wijnandsradestraat 11, 6845 HR Arnhem, Netherlands
Removed the BLABLALBLALALB that was at the end of this page. Someone was being naughty. Javafreek 00:20, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: suggest

message: I see what the writer is getting at with the bit about jump blues relegating the guitar to the rhythm section, sorta, but didn't T-Bone Walker lay the foundations of modern electric guitar playing in a jump band? Of course, this is a very slim article at this point.  I don't think B.B. King ever had a jump band, his was a little later, and always the R&B "big band", four horns and a rhythm section and probably a Hammond organ.Ortolan88 02:56, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that T-Bone Walker should be incorporated into the article text.  I'm adding him to the "See Also" list.  --Archaeolojae (talk) 15:36, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Something wrong here

message: I'd love to see more about the relationship to Swing music and especially to "Swing Jazz".
I figure that Jump Blues is usually played with swing timing. Is it considered to be a swing genre as well?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.174.116.230 (talk) 17:06, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  - For example Louis Jordan combinating jump blues elements with the swing note and this unique mix can be viewed as an precendent of rock and roll. -- RockandDiscoFanCZ (talk) 08:30, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relationship to swing? 

message: I think it's simplistic to say that jump blues was simply relabeled "rock and roll" in the 1950s. The rock and roll article does not describe it that way, so there is a consistency problem, at least. I know the differences are hard to define, but they surely lie mainly in syncopation (jump blues is; rock and roll typically isn't) and instrumentation (horns vs rhythm guitar). I recognize that real-world phenomena are not neatly categorized for convenient labeling, but *something* caused people to start calling it rock and roll, and there are *many* stories of young people hearing rock and roll for the first time and absolutely flipping out. --Tysto (talk) 04:05, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, so I removed those claims today. They will need to be clarified and backed up with citations before being re-added. —mjb (talk) 08:03, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Relationship to rock and roll
Talk:Lo Wu

message: I am not sure what had been shown on this page about taking taxi to Lo Wu. As I know, we can only go there by KCR.
----
Excuse me, why Lo Wu is a restricted area? It's not obvious to average reader and probably worthy of explaining or possibly linking to other article.
-- Forseti 08:11, 19 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The content in this article should be divided into Lo Wu (Hong Kong) and Luo Hu (Shenzhen). They are of different administrative region and should not be put in the same article. Please refer to 羅湖 (香港) and 罗湖区 in Chinese Wikipedia.  Also see divided cities to see that why this article should be divided into two. --Hello World! 02:09, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The same can also be done to Sha Tau Kok/Shatoujiao.  — Instantnood 08:05, May 20, 2005 (UTC)
I am rewriting the contents of Luohu according to Chinese version. --Hello World! 12:46, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation
Talk:Lal (Star Trek)

message: Imo, this article should be at "Lal" rather than "Lal (Star Trek)", because their is no probability of confusion with another concept (like their is with Data and Quark). The only other LAL's I could find on google are acronyms, like Laboratoire de l'Accélérateur Linéaire. But if their is a real-life concept with a strong claim to "Lal", then someone ought to write a stub at "Lal" and include disambiguation to fict. Lal. ShutterBugTrekker 16:12, 18 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:Association of Members' Advocates/Archive 1

message: I've added a text to Wikipedia:Mediation#Advocates and have decided to start a Wikipedia:Guide to Advocacy where that text is posted. Comments, changes, suggestions are greatly appreciated by OMA members and others. — Alex756  talk 16:15, 8 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I've changed the syntax. Hopefully that does make sense now... — Alex756  talk 23:13, 8 Feb 2004 (UTC)

text: I've started drafting some suggestions on the Wikipedia:OMA FAQs page. — Alex756  talk 01:14, 10 Feb 2004 (UTC)

text: Yes that would be a great place for us to organize meetings (can we do that in a chat room or on IRC?) — Alex756  talk 01:14, 10 Feb 2004 (UTC)

text: Maybe a separate page just of members contact info? — Alex756  talk 01:14, 10 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Talk about the AMA should go here:

message: There's a lack of parallelism in this list.  Item (b) is easily fixed by removing 'to' from its beginning, but (c) doesn't seem to fit the list conceptually.  It sounds like it should be outside the list, but perhaps Alex meant something slightly different?  --Spikey 18:31, 8 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I've changed the syntax. Hopefully that does make sense now... — Alex756  talk 23:13, 8 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Purpose of the Association section 

message: How do people go about choosing an advocate? Should there be something about which areas which people would prefer to deal with? Does someone choose an advocate, or do they just ask for one here, and then one of the members volunteers to take on the case? Angela. 23:09, Feb 9, 2004 (UTC)
:I've started drafting some suggestions on the Wikipedia:OMA FAQs page. — Alex756  talk 01:14, 10 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Choosing an advocate 

message: Would it be useful to have a message board set up for this like the mediation and arbitration committees have? Angela. 00:01, Feb 10, 2004 (UTC)
:Yes that would be a great place for us to organize meetings (can we do that in a chat room or on IRC?) — Alex756  talk 01:14, 10 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Where to discuss

message: Shouldn't contact and irc info go on the main OMA page?  Or is it cleaner to keep it here?  --Spikey 19:59, 9 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe a separate page just of members contact info? — Alex756  talk 01:14, 10 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contact info
Talk:Gambling in Macau

message: This thing has much valuable content but is really bad style (probably written by a not native speaker). I am also a not native speaker, maybe a native speaker would be so nice and clean it up?? Also some rambling has to be removed. -- 84.57.69.121 04:39, 17 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Style 

message: Hi. The picture at Casinos_in_Macau#Horse_racing about the location of the racecoureses is missing Cotai, a newly reclaimed land between Taipa and Coloane islands. Cound somebody fix it? Thanks. --Notnd (talk) 15:30, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture

message: This section is a total mess, and needs to be completely re-done. Really the entire article needs a re-write but its easy to start with the factual stuff first, also I don't mind working on this part.
I think the most sensible and helpful way to order the list is by date opened. This way, the list will be easy to update, and it will have the most relevant information highest (as most people will want to visit the newer, especially post-2004 casinos). The opening hour column can definitely go and can be replaced by the date opened column. It's probably most sensible to keep, but possibly rename the other two categories into 'number of tables/slots' and 'number of hotel rooms'. So it would be Name-Date Opened-Tables/Slots-Hotel Rooms. 
If anybody would like to comment or make suggestions before I go ahead and rework the list, please comment below.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Caspar esq. (talk • contribs) 16:56, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of Casinos 

message: There would seem to be a lot of overlap between these articles, and neither is large enough that a combined article would be too big. Any objections to a merge? BDD (talk) 18:56, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merge with [[Macau gaming law]]

message: This page should be converted to SI units, no one in Macau uses imperial.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.175.21.132 (talk) 10:30, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Units 
Talk:Scalpay, Inner Hebrides

message: Um, this is confusing me.  I know there is a Sanday in the Orkneys.  I don't know if there is one in the Inner Hebrides.  Why redirect from Sanday to Scalpay? Deb 18:54, 18 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Sanday in the Inner Hebrides is beside Canna.--h i s   s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 16:54, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Robert Barclay

message: For those who wish to read early Quaker writings, Barclay together with Isaac Pennington are amongst the more accessible. Others with more familiar names can be too rambling and referential for modern taste
`
:Fox and Nayler (and the other early ones) are quite rambling, ecstatic, and so on, but there are also substative differences in content, not just style, between them and the second generation (e.g. Barclay, Penn, Penington). Barclay was still a little bit Calvinist, for example. --Zach 03:11, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Operational amplifier

message: Regarding nb1 and the definition of zero. Because of the high open-loop gain, it doesn't matter so much the exact meaning of zero. In most cases, it is only in a completed circuit where the definition matters. Otherwise, for ones that do have the offset leads, you build the circuit and then adjust for the appropriate zero, which might include some other offsets, too. Gah4 (talk) 00:20, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  nb1 

message: In the timeline the point under 1970s about FET OPs is a bit confusing and vague. The early FET OPs were JFET based as hybrids - so seprate chips for the JFETs at the input and the main part. Later came JFET based monolytic OPs and also CMOS based monolytic OPs. CMOS OPs got a lot more popular, espeically for low votlage use, but have not fully replaced monolytic JFET input OPs - only for a few super low bias applications. Relevant milestones may be the first monolytic JFET input OP and CMOS OP - could be problematic if the early ones were rare, special ones. --Ulrich67 (talk) 18:02, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timeline - FET OPs 

message: The first produced year seems to be for the 741, but that wasn't the first opamp. The uA702 was released in 1963, which was probably the first monolithic opamp. But there were opamps before that. 72.74.174.182 (talk) 03:48, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The 741 was released in 1968. I'm not sure what the 1967 year refers to. Craig Stuntz (talk) 17:21, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  First produced 

message: The offset could be specified as an input offset voltage (to get zero output), or output voltage with zero input. I don't know that one is better, which might be why the statement in the recent edit isn't so obvious. Gah4 (talk) 07:15, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  zero offset
Talk:St Edmund Hall, Oxford

message: I have corrected the date women were first admitted to the Hall, incorrectly given as 1978. That was my own first year at the Hall, and I think I would have remembered if women were admitted the same year! It was the year after (October 1979) they were first admitted. DoctorMartin (talk) 22:32, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The cited source says "Since 1978 the Hall has admitted female students to membership, with the first women undergraduates matriculating in 1979". I have clarified the sentence in our article. DuncanHill (talk) 22:40, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date women were first admitted to the Hall 

message: do you have a reference to support changing cross patonce to cross fleury in the St Edmund Hall, Oxford and Edmund of Abingdon articles? According to the cross fleury article "In early armory, it is not consistently distinguished from the cross patonce." The Heraldry society has cross patonce for SEH (https://www.theheraldrysociety.com/articles/oxford-university-and-its-colleges/). TSventon (talk) 12:28, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  St Edmund Hall Coat of Arms 

message: : Little is known of hi, after his time at St Edmund's but it is believed he died in Prague as a veteran Hussite.
This is just not true. Just the article about him tells a lot about him after he came to Prague, and the Czech version is even longer, because his later activity during the Hussite Revolution is quite known here. Could we just drop this sentence?
Ceplm (talk) 16:08, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Ceplm, I think the Peter Payne section is too long, so I have removed the final sentence. TSventon (talk) 16:27, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: That's exactly what I thought should be done. Rather than talking nonsense it’s better to leave it to the separate article. Ceplm (talk) 16:47, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peter Payne
Talk:Israeli barrier

message: There was a lot of material in Separation barrier (which also used to be a disambig) that was just WP:OR information for that article. However, much of the information is interesting and did belong somewhere - and this is the most natural place. There was a lot of inconclusive debate on what to do with the WP:OR, so I just was bold and moved the Israel related material over here.  Going to now cut down some of the duplicate material from the Separation barrier article.  I think it does deserve to be an actual article with "main article" links to the other articles. Carolmooredc  (Talkie-Talkie) 17:12, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: This article is not needed. WP:IJUSTLIKEIT is just not a good reason to keep superfluous content. The current Separation barrier article originally began life as a WP:POV fork and this content is just an extension of that. It repeats what is already written in Israeli West Bank barrier and the other, related articles. Therefore, I am returning it BACK to a disambiguation page. AnotherNewAccount (talk) 23:05, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Created needed article from disambig
Talk:Benito Juárez

message: Thoughts on creating :Template:Benito Juárez per :Category:Benito Juárez? ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:03, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Navigation template 

message: Legashhh x mi 177.228.32.114 (talk) 18:53, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jhaja 

message: The article lists Juárez as the first and only indigenous president of Mexico. Wasn't Victoriano Huerta also indigenous ? --JNguyenFlohic (talk) 16:53, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indigenous president
Talk:Ocellated turkey

message: Transferred from Agriocharis to Meleagris following HBW (Wiki standard source) - MPF 18:38, 24 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: rerated as C, needs more comprehensiveness-wise. Casliber (talk · contribs) 23:23, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The distribution map at the top of the article seems to represent only a fraction of its range - equivalent to Yucatan state in Mexico. The shaded area should stretch much further south and west if it is to take in the range described in the text (and I've certainly seen ocellated turkeys in the wild in Petén, Guatemala). Simon Burchell (talk) 20:55, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Distribution

message: Anyone know what it naturally subsists upon?  I think that info would benefit the article and really, any species article that doesn't currently list known prey. — Somarinoa (talk) 20:08, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Diet?
Talk:Picard language

message: This page was originally translated from the French wikipedia article in response to a request on Wikipedia:Translation into English:
*Article: :fr:Picard
*Corresponding English-language article: Picard language
*Worth doing because: No corresponding English article
* Originally Requested by: Bogdangiusca 19:29, 7 Feb 2004
*Status: Completed translation. fabiform | talk 20:22, 18 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: It has been proposed that Languages of Oïl be renamed and moved to Langues d'Oïl. Comments and votes on Talk:Languages of Oïl, please, if you're interested. Man vyi 09:10, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed move 

message: The following statement needs a reference: "However, Picard is far from dead and constitutes a lively and large part of the daily life and folklore of the region."  This probably not true.  it is likely close to death, spoken only by a few elderly.
:I don't know how vibrant it is, but it is certainly used as the names of a few commercial products including a widely available brand of beer. --MacRusgail 17:02, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference needed 

message: Which non-Romance languages is Picard influenced by? I would suspect some English and Flemish influence at least, since Picard appears to have expanded into some Flemish speaking areas. --MacRusgail 17:02, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Loanwords

message: Of course Picard is a language but it is French! Therefore, to say that "Picard is a language closely related to French" is closely nonsensical... It implies that French would only be one of the dialects of the langue d'oïl, the one that turned to be the official langage used in France : this is assuredly what we mean vulgarly using the word French, but this is not accurate in a linguistic context. Shall we say that Dorian, for instance, is a language closely related to Greek ? Picard is French as Champenois, Anglo-Normand, Wallon, Berrichon, Poitevin-Saintongeais, Franc-comtois, Bourgignon, Gallo, etc. 78.240.31.116 (talk) 19:32, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dialect vs language 

message: Can someone shed some light on why Picard is called Chti as well -- is this a common characteristic of their pronunciation, for example? Also, Im removing the link to Chti in the second paragraph because it just redirects to the article itself. Cheers, Mabuse (talk) 17:58, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: In the example phrases in the article, "un Ch'ti mi" is translated as "a northerner". Maproom (talk) 20:47, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is Picard referred to as Chti or Chtimi?  

message: Many of the French biographies of the former Liverpool manager refer to him as a "Ch'ti", as he grew up in Pas de Calais, but it would need further investigation as to whether he himself was actually a speaker of Picard. https://www.footamateur.fr/gerard-houllier-linstituteur-chti-qui-a-conquis-liverpool/ Culloty82 (talk) 12:56, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gerard Houllier