Talk:List of world records in chess

message: I'm a bit sceptical of this "(as played at the professional level)" - there are really a very small number of truly professional players, and I'm not convinced that, for example, Djordjeic - Kovacevic, Bela Crkva 1984 (given as the shortest tournament game) involves one of them. Tim Krabbé (who I assume is the source of this) says that this was a "serious tournament" but that's not the same thing as "professional". Are we sure that "professional" is correct? --Camembert
:I've decided to change "at a professional level" to "in serious tournaments" - probably not perfect wording (I've seen six year olds play, and their parents can take it pretty seriously...), but better. --Camembert
----
What about an entry for "longest winning streak" in serious tournament games?  Didn't Fischer go 17 games at one point without losing or drawing?  -Fritzlein 18:23, 23 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: In the same vein, I believe Capablanca was undefeated through tournaments for eight successive years (1916 - 1923 IIRC). thefamouseccles 02:42, 03 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Old talk

message: Here are categories of records, which in my opinion would greatly enhance this page.  I don't have time right now to go research, but will when I get it.  In the mean time if anybody's willing to have a crack at it, please, by all means.
*  Winning streaks (tournaments, matches, career, etc.)  also differentiate between purely wining (i.e. no draws, only wins) and no losses (i.e only draws and wins).  Also differentiate if possible between classical chess, rapid chess, correspondance chess, etc.
*  Variant chess (blindfold, simultaneous).  How many boards was the max?  records (wins, losses, draws), etc.  
*  Game features (number of queens, number of moves, amount of time, etc.)
I agree with you completely- and I believe that even more should be added to that, eg. shortest possible game- fools mate, most common opening played, least sensible opening (a matter of opinion, I know but this is almost universally agreed) 1...f5 in response to 1.e4 and to play 1.f3 to start with then with 2.Kf2.
Also, what about most dangerous accepted opening for White or Black? And the most high-risk (higher win-loss rate than draws)openings? They should be quite interesting.
: "Most queens" is needed, but the example given as the most (5?) is thought to be bogus, I think.  Bubba73 (talk), 02:43, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  You are probably thinking of the notorious Alekhine-Grigoriev "game", which was really Alekhine's analysis embellishing on the actual game continuation. According to Tim Krabbé's chess records page (external link given in article), there are 6 legitimate tournament games with five queens on the board at once - though he unhelpfully gives only three of them. I would guess that Tresling-Benima, Winschoten 1896 (full score given on pp. 127-28 of Chernev's Wonders and Curiosities of Chess) is probably another legit one. There, the five queens were only on the board for a moment, so it wouldn't have made Krabbé's list (he only lists games where all the queens stayed on for a little while). Krakatoa (talk) 07:08, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

text: Probably right, but I don't know what would be considered a reliable source these days for the best tournament result ever. The Chessmetrics site hasn't been revised for almost six years, apparently. I think Jeff Sonas might have written an article for ChessBase on whether Carlsen's win gave him the best performance rating ever. Bobby Fischer's 6-0 win over Larsen was in a match, not a tournament, but would be a strong contender for best performance rating ever. Krakatoa (talk) 01:18, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes, Sonas did. According to Sonas, Carlsen's result, while the best ever by a teenager, was "only" tied for the 13th best tournament performance rating in history. The best was Karpov's amazing 11/13 at Linares 1994. Krakatoa (talk) 02:04, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lots more records needed 

message: Under Shortest Game, in the "ridiculous" game between Hubner and Rogoff it should be obvious that after 4...0-0 the move 5 Qxd7 does not give check. Is it the score that is wrong, or the check? Cottonshirt (talk) 08:59, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in Score 

message: Chessbase says that Sergei Tiviakov went 110 games without a loss from 28.10.2004 until 28.09.2005. This is the first I've heard of this and I'm a little skeptical. Can anyone with access to a database confirm? Peter Ballard (talk) 23:25, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I haven't heard of it either.  Tal's record is currently in jeporady, though.  Bubba73 (talk), 23:53, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Not from Wang Yue, who lost last night in the FIDE Grand Prix 2008-2009. As for Tiviakov, it seems he wrote to Chessbase himself! On a Dec 4 item, Chessbase wrote: "Addendum: we have been informed by GM Sergey Tiviakov that from 28.10.2004 until 28.09.2005 he played 110 games (normal FIDE controls, no rapid) and didn't lose any. "Of course, my opponents were not all very strong," he writes, "but they did include Ivanchuk, Aronian, Radjabov, Carlsen, Dreev, etc. So my record can still be compared with that of Wang Yue, for example."" So while I'm sure Tiviakov wouldn't lie about it, I still think a database check would be nice. Peter Ballard (talk) 00:03, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think Kramnik has a streak of 80+ going, according to Susan Polgar's blog about a week ago.  Bubba73 (talk), 00:09, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I know he had a streak a few years ago, but must I remind you already of the World Chess Championship 2008???? :) :) Peter Ballard (talk) 00:14, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

text:  Maybe that's what they were talking about.  My copy of chessbase only has 90 or so games for Tiviakov in that time period.  The only loses are two to Ivanchuk on 12-18-04 in the Carlos Torre Wimbleton Wimbledon.  They played four games that day, so they must have been rapid or blitz, so I don't know if they were FIDE rated.  Bubba73 (talk), 00:22, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

text: I think it was in style of a FIDE knockout (2 regular games, then rapid playoffs). The FIDE rating report gives Tiviakov 2.5/4, but if you look at the TWIC report he won his first round 1.5-0.5, then lost 1-3 (2 draws then 2 losses) to Ivanchuk. So the only way I can reconcile the two reports is that he drew 2 games with Ivanchuk (which were rated) then lost 2 rapids to Ivanchuk (not rated). So no regular time control losses there, as far as I can tell. Peter Ballard (talk) 00:53, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  It was a knockout event. Chessbase does show two draws and two losses to Ivanchuk that day. Bubba73 (talk), 00:59, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Regarding Tiviakov, whom Peter Ballard referenced at the beginning of this section, Chessgames.com shows him losing 14 games in 2004 and 2005, but they all seem to be outside the specified period. Krakatoa (talk) 00:39, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Most games without a loss 

message: In the References section, I cite an Internet article by Tim Harding, and supply an author-link for Tim Harding (chess).  However, it doesn't show up, nor is it redlinked. I have no idea why the author-link doesn't work. Can some take a look at this and see if you can fix it? Thanks. Krakatoa (talk) 09:09, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: .  Apparantly "cite web" needs "authorlink" instead of "author-link" (with a hyphen). "Citation" can take either. Bubba73 (talk), 02:41, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Can someone please fix my link?

message: Do two computers count? http://www.xs4all.nl/~timkr/chess2/honor.htm 493 Moves. SunCreator (talk) 12:54, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Off hand, I'd say no, but you'd need context. Since computers don't get tired, or even die, there's literally no limit. BashBrannigan (talk) 20:10, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The last 402 moves of the 493-move game were king versus king, which I believe is a draw (material insufficiency) whether anyone claims it or not. So I don't think that should count. Krabbé also mentions computer games of over 300 moves with opposite-colored bishops, where neither player "knew" about the 50-move rule. Of course, you and I can sit down and break the "longest game" record tomorrow, if we just reach some dead-drawn ending and neither of us ever invokes the 50-move rule or three-time repetition. Krakatoa (talk) 09:01, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, playing hundreds of moves in a clearly drawn position should obviously not count. But it would be interesting to find the longest computer game which is not trivially drawn before the last move. Endgame databases have found positions which take >500 moves to win (if the 50-move rule is ignored), but I don't know if these ever come up in "real" computer games...Roentgenium111 (talk) 14:39, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Longest game 

message: This one looks out of place with the others. This is a composition, while ALL the others are people playing in tournaments. Also, it's not explained very well. I considered deleting it, but thought I should get other's views. The only advantage of it, is that it has a visual component, which is otherwise lacking on this page. BashBrannigan (talk) 20:13, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've just seen this page, and I agree that the position is not a "world record". I can't find an article on "extreme positions in chess" or similar: it would belong there if anywhere. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 14:34, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  No more comments, so I've deleted this example. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 13:27, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks for making Wikipedia less useful, however the info was preserved here, better try to take that down too! https://www.chess.com/forum/view/fun-with-chess/what-chess-position-has-the-most-number-of-possible-moves 2600:8800:7900:1A9:4861:8D43:BFD4:4526 (talk) 01:48, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maximum moves?? 

message: I am restoring Valentina Gunina's perfect score at the 2010 Moscow Blitz tournament Women's section on the following grounds, despite it being once reverted by Krakatoa on the grounds of Wikipedia:Notability.
* It is covered by a well-respect chess news website (Chessbase)
* The uniqueness of the result has been noted by the current women's world chess champion: 
* It is a fairly high level tournament with many titled players (IMs, WGM, WIMs).  Note that full grandmasters are extremely rare among women.
* In blitz chess, the standard deviation is larger (more upsets) so a perfect score is even more difficult than at slow time controls.  Players losing in blitz to other players rated 200-300 points below them is not uncommon.
* Wikipedia:Notability is a requirement of the subject of the full article, not individual facts within it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by John85 (talk • contribs) 07:44, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The ChessBase article cited for this achievement mentions only one International Master who played in this tournament - not very impressive. Contrary to your claim, Alexandra Kosteniuk does not note "the uniqueness of the result" - all she said at the source you cite is "And, in the women's section, WGM Valentina Gunina, was the best performere [sic] by winning all her 17 games." Winning a women's-only blitz tournament with a perfect score is not, to my mind, significant enough to warrant inclusion. Anyone else care to weigh in on this? Krakatoa (talk) 06:33, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Valentina Gunina's perfect tournament 

message: The article claims that the youngest player to achieve an Elo rating did so at about age 5, attaining a 1283 rating. This seems very doubtful. Michael Aigner, in an article on the United States Chess Federation website, notes that a 3-year-old scored 3/7 in the 2010 Golden State Open. Krakatoa (talk) 06:21, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  It is not uncommon for us to have five-year-olds in our local scholastic tournaments.  Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 06:26, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'm deleting it. For the reasons we've discussed above it's extremely doubtful, nor is there any showing that www.mid-day.com is a reliable source for this information. The cited article offered no basis for its conclusion that this player was indeed the youngest rated player. Krakatoa (talk) 10:32, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Youngest player to be rated? 

message: Is there a minimum percentage score for a simultaneous exhibition be considered for a world record?  Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 05:48, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes of cause. And it is not that low. I remember 50% or 75%.-Koppapa (talk) 08:43, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  minimum percentage for simul record? 

message: Would it not be more practical to order this section by the number of wins achieved? The list is ordered by date at the moment, which seems to make some sense, but people would more likely to be looking for the 'greatest' achievement rather than the 'first' IMO. Alternatively, we could put the various stats on this page into sortable tables. Thomasdav (talk) 14:59, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Since ordering the list a few months ago, this section has become even more unruly, esp. with the poorly formatted links to Wesley So's achievements (on a side note, this player seems to get an almost disproportionate amount of coverage on Wikipedia, so I'd suggest watching any edits concerning him for relevance). If nobody objects in the next few days, I'll probably re-format the list into a table with all extra information (e.g. Kostic being the only non-british player at the hastings tournament) below.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thomasdav (talk • contribs) 07:31, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ordering of Perfect Tournament Scores Section 

message: This is one of those records where an extended discussion is likely to turn up new record holders repeatedly, when people like me stumble across this page and happen to know of a player who can beat the currently listed one. Right now Ortvin Sarapu is listed as the record holder, having won or co-won the New Zealand championship 20 times. However, a press release from the Guatemalan Sports Federation states that Carlos Juarez has won that country's championship 24 times. Here is a link to the press release (in Spanish): http://cdag.com.gt/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Final-Masculino.pdf. I am submitting an update to list Juarez as the record holder, but would not be surprised if somebody else has surpassed that figure.
Caissanist (talk) 11:42, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Most wins of a national championship 

message: In the interests of being neutral about the FIDE/Classical split (as well as the fact that the Nigel Short and Judit Polgar articles count them), I think we should also have most wins against FIDE world champions. I've done some looking on Chessgames and Kasparov has beaten 11 (everyone since Smyslov onwards except himself and Fischer). Karpov hasn't beaten Ponomariov so he has 10 at best. Korchnoi has 10 (the 8 classical champions listed in the article, plus Topalov and Ponomariov). and Short has defeated 9 (see Talk:Nigel Short). I know this is WP:OR, but I can't imagine anyone else being in a position to defeat 11 World Champions, and it's easy to verify on Chessgames too. I propose saying that Kasparov has defeated 11, without claiming it as a record. Adpete (talk) 09:33, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The problem here (and elsewhere) is that editors have set their own standards of which World Champions and/or time controls are relevant, instead of following the information set out in reliable sources (such as ). Toccata quarta (talk) 10:19, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't count that as a reliable source, in terms of notability. This was a puzzle competition, in which the FIDE champions were excluded only because Kasparov "decided that was unfair to the older players". So they acknowledge that there are two ways to count the record, but only chose to exclude FIDE champions for a pretty arbitrary reason. Adpete (talk) 11:34, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

text: p.s. that article only attributes 6 to Korchnoi. I've no idea what they missed, because it's easy to check that his score is 8. Adpete (talk) 11:39, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: ChessBase is not a reliable source? Good. Can we proceed by deleting the whole Index of chess articles? Toccata quarta (talk) 11:42, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: You have misinterpreted what I wrote. I did not say Chessbase was not a reliable source. I said that particular article was not a reliable source in terms of establishing notability. What I meant was, you cannot use that article to argue that one record is more notable than another, because it was a trivia competition, and Chessbase even felt the need to justify why it listed one record rather than another. Adpete (talk) 12:29, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Judit Polgar has also defeated 11 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judit_Polg%C3%A1r), why isn;t she included in the paragraph alongside Kasparov & Korchnoi ? Greg Holden 08 (talk) 08:28, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: No objections to including Judit Polgar but it should be cleanly verified. The Judit Polgar article says she's beaten 11 world champions including both classical and rapid games. If this is indeed a record then she can be included; however if it has been beaten then it shouldn't be (and whoever beat 12 or more world champions should be included). The section as it is cites no sources, and I cannot easily verify the records, so I won't make changes to the section. Banedon (talk) 06:12, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Most wins against World Champions 

message: What about fewest moves to stalemate?95.45.146.18 (talk) 19:57, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Fewest moves to stalemate

message: I thought 2 moves was the least needed to get checkmate. http://www.chess.com/article/view/2-move-checkmate  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Perfectamundo (talk • contribs) 20:17, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Fools mate

message: This page is poorly organised, with unrelated records mixed up in no particular order. I'm going to add a few subheadings. MaxBrowne (talk) 04:25, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Haphazard 

message: Sorry, I am only user on the German speaking Wikipedia (user frostengel there) and therefore have to post anonymous here. The record posted here is not the real record, as https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolf_B%C3%B6hringer German chess player Wolf Böhringer lead the "Schacheck" for over 59 years. It was printed once a week for the whole time in the "Heilbronner Stimme", news paper of a German city. The "Schackecke" (chess corner) still exists but now someone else leads it. Still the record for a printed chess column seems to go to Wolf.
Jochen (user frostengel on German wikipedia); 9:11 (GMT+2), 15 September 2015  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.223.128.68 (talk) 07:13, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Longest-running chess column 

message: Please delete this "record". It is not mentioned outside Wikipedia. --Chvsanchez (talk) 00:27, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to make such changes yourself. Agree that this record/piece of trivia is dubious. In the 19th Century the Sicilian had a poor reputation so it's quite likely that there were tournaments with no Sicilians back then. For modern day tournaments, statistics indicate that about 40% of the time Black responds to 1.e4 with a Sicilian. If we assume from this that 50% of players sometimes play the Sicilian as Black, then in a round robin tournament of 12 you'll see no Sicilians about 0.5^12 times, or about 1 in 4000 tournaments. Very rough estimate of course, but it happens sometimes. Someone with ChessBase or similar might be able to construct a query to identify "no Sicilian" tournaments. MaxBrowne (talk) 00:44, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: That section was added by the chess editor for whom I have the greatest respect, but I think it was correct to remove it.  It's an interesting bit of trivia, but not all interesting trivia is a world record.  Quale (talk) 02:53, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fewest Sicilian Defences in a tournament 

message: Article states: "In terms of number of moves, the quickest mate possible in chess is known as Fool's mate (1.g4 e5 2.f3?? Qh4# and variants thereof)". How many moves is that? 3 I assume but it's not obvious to someone who doesn't know chess notations. Can someone who is sure add the number of moves to the article? Cls14 (talk) 13:27, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Shortest game

message: Concerning this edit: 
I don't see how Yifan's resignation after five moves can be called a record. The source says so, but it's plainly untrue, since Oscar Panno resigned after one move against Fischer and he is also a grandmaster. Earlier in the section there's also a 3-move game 1. d4 Nf6 2. Bg5 c6 3. e3?? Qa5+ White resigns. Pinging  since it's his / her edit. Banedon (talk) 23:15, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Also concerned that recent edits to Hou Yifan are WP:UNDUE, does this silly incident really deserve a section under "Notable Games"? I already had it covered under the "2017" section, it was a minor thing that got blown up out of all proportion in the mainstream press. MaxBrowne (talk) 00:37, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

text: You folks are the subject area experts. I am not, and I will defer to your judgment about what should or shouldn't be in the articles.  Thanks for your attention. —Mark Dominus (talk) 08:09, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Honestly then I think this should be removed. Since the game was a protest, there were many more shorter games "lost" by grandmasters. I'll go ahead and edit the section. Banedon (talk) 01:01, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shortest game record 

message: I think we are skating on very thin ice with Z. Đorđević–M. Kovačević.  For one thing, a "Candidate Master" is not a "Master".  And, are they even CM's?  The real point is that it would be next to impossible to substantiate or refute the claim that this game is a record, if we had to consider all games played at the level of these two gentlemen, because there are just too many such games, and many of them are played in local clubs or other circumstances where they cannot be verified, etc.  Bruce leverett (talk) 15:21, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: This is the Tim Krabbe piece I referred to in my edit summary. It says explicitly that the players were not masters. "En als dat geen meesters waren (ze hadden ratings van rond de 2100)...". In most of the world 2200 isn't really considered a master rating, 2300 is more like it... FM level or close. That's why the DSB (German Chess Federation) doesn't even bother awarding national titles anymore, a "master" to them is someone who has the FM title. It's also difficult to verify that their ratings were even "around 2100", and in any case "around 2100" is not a "master" rating anywhere in the world. MaxBrowne (talk) 15:47, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: On the other hand, saying it is the shortest decisive tournament game would be even harder to verify, because the total number of such games would be even greater. If we can't say that shorter games has never occurred between players rated 2100 and higher, then how can we say Fool's Mate has never occurred in a tournament game? Banedon (talk) 01:02, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

text: As the article stands now, it says nothing about "Master" and is then certainly wrong on the matter. First, the contradiction vs. the the 3-ply "In a tournament game at odds of pawn and move" game(s) a couple of paragraphs above, and second: if we consider only no-odds games, six ply is longer than this infamous checkmate in the 2014 Chess Olympiad.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.240.49.4 (talk) 14:01, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shortest decisive game 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on List of world records in chess. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://geocities.com/SiliconValley/Lab/7378/short1.txt
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091126000035/http://chess.eusa.ed.ac.uk/Chess/Trivia/AlltimeList.html to http://chess.eusa.ed.ac.uk/Chess/Trivia/AlltimeList.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:40, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Currently this section includes the following text:
"José Raúl Capablanca went eight years without a loss (1916 to 1924, including his World Chess Championship 1921 victory over Emanuel Lasker), but this was "only" 63 games."
Assuming that this record is only there because of duration, then Steinitz must have done better - after all, he recorded 25 consecutive wins over 9 years, which means he went 9 years without a loss. On checking chessgames.com this totals 32 games. I'm going to make the edit, but if someone disagrees feel free to revert. Banedon (talk) 05:47, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Most games without losses record 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of world records in chess. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110604174831/http://www.chessbase.com/newsprint.asp?newsid=4210 to http://www.chessbase.com/newsprint.asp?newsid=4210
*Added  tag to http://www.theweekinchess.com/html/malcolmpein/world-mass-simul-record-broken-in-india
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:03, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This seems to me a fairly meaningless figure. It seems to have been calculated in various ways; the current FIDE (and universal? it seems not) way is : tournament performance rating for a perfect rating = average FIDE rating of opponents + 800. Using average opponent rating instead, in the case of perfect scores, would make a lot more sense. 110.20.157.59 (talk) 02:37, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Performance rating of perfect results 

message: Some more tournaments with 5 world-champions (non-exhaustive list, by quick clicking):
- http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chess.pl?tid=55428 Kramnik, Anand, Carlsen, Topalov, and Ponomariov
- http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chess.pl?tid=90344 Kasparov, Karpov, Smyslov, Khalifman, Tal
There can be more, there were various tournaments Kramnik, Anand, and Carlsen played together, and it's likely some of them had also somebody from Topalov/Ponomariov/Kasmidzhanov/Khalifman pool. Or maybe even Karpov or Kasparov.
Another interesting case:
- http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chess.pl?tid=39543 had 4/7 - four world champions (Kramnik, Anand, Kasparov, Ponomiariov) among 7 players, more than 50% participants with a title.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mekkk (talk • contribs) 11:47, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Most world champions in the tournament 

message: Does anybody have the databases to actually verify Tiviakov and/or Lalic's claims to 100+ game unbeaten streaks? I believe them but it would be nice to have confirmation.
I think it would be good to rewrite this section to properly reflect the doubtfulness that this list of streaks is in any way exhaustive. I very much doubt anybody has pored through chess history enough to say with any certainty that we haven't missed many long streaks (for instance, a recent Chessbase article mentions Ulf Andersson as another claimant to a very long streak). 68.168.186.4 (talk) 07:18, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Tiviakov sent in his 110 games to Chessbase, so I went ahead and added them to the section in question. I might rewrite the accompanying text, too. 68.168.186.4 (talk) 22:43, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I think we need some objective way to measure this. Tiviakov's streak is in many ways not that impressive since it involved 2200-2300 rated players. Is it still a streak, yeah, but if I went and played 200 games against Carlsen he'd very much be at a "200-game undefeated streak", heck he'd even have beaten the record for most consecutive wins. Still, now that Chessbase has reported on this, I would incline towards keeping the record here. Banedon (talk) 23:05, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The bigger problem here is that editors think that chessgames.com game scores can be used to prove unbeaten streaks, or anything else.  It is not a WP:RS.  I think it can be provided under limited circumstances as a useful resource for the readers, but if chessgames.com is the only reference for a claim, that claim must go.  04:56, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I also think if we're going to report Tiviakov as a record holder, we should report Lalic too. After all, all we have at the moment is Tiviakov's word; it has not been independently verified. This section is turning out to be a real pain in the arse. MaxBrowne2 (talk) 08:01, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm with the IP. Tiviakov did provide evidence of his streak (and Chessbase evidently believed him enough to report it), Lalic did not. List Tiviakov, but not Lalic. Banedon (talk) 21:38, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Tiviakov's evidence is still just a list of games in the end. I don't believe his claim is any stronger than Lalic's. MaxBrowne2 (talk) 23:19, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a list of games with moves, names of opponents, and venue. Does Lalic's claim have any evidence backing it up? Banedon (talk) 23:47, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  According to the European Chess Union Lalic's streak is only 108 games... no evidence is provided.  MaxBrowne2 (talk) 00:20, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

text: Okay, I think the section is getting ludicrous now, and would rather just delete it entirely. Same goes for the section about consecutive wins. I propose we have an RfC for this. Banedon (talk) 00:51, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I would recommend against this, do we really want to bring in a whole lot of non-chessplayers? We can publicize it at the WP:CHESS talk page and get some more feedback from there. MaxBrowne2 (talk) 01:44, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Well if we don't have an RfC, how are we going to decide which claims are valid? It's not just whether those streaks happened - there's also the question of how high a level of opposition one must play against before the streak is valid. Banedon (talk) 09:59, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the dispute hasn't risen to the level of an RFC yet, and MaxBrowne is right to warn that an RFC would likely attract some uninformed opinion that would not make it easier to find a good solution.  I think it would be better to start a new section with your proposal(s) for handling this issue in the article, advertise it on WT:CHESS and see if a consensus can be reached on this article talk page without needing the formality of an official RFC.  RFC can be necessary if the involved parties are deadlocked and need outside help to break the logjam.  I'm not sure we are deadlocked here yet.  Of course if anyone strongly disapproves of your proposal they might create an RFC themselves, but I hope it doesn't come to that. Quale (talk) 01:52, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Well then I'll say List Tiviakov @ 110, Lalic @ 108 per the Chessbase & ECU sources. Banedon (talk) 01:26, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: There are question marks over some of Tiviakov's games, which didn't meet the requirements to be FIDE rated (3 games in a day, time control too short). MaxBrowne2 (talk) 08:46, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tiviakov and Lalic's streaks without losses 

message: Is it time to drop the reference to Ding Liren's 100-game streak now that he has been decisively overtaken by Carlsen?
Also, I assume that if Carlsen gets to 110+ unbeaten games we'll lose all reference to Lalic/Tiviakov's lesser achievements.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by A153829 (talk • contribs) 17:52, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Carlsen's 101-game (and counting) unbeaten streak 

message: In the chess context, saying "Carlsen drew Aronian" means Carlsen was paired with Aronian in a Swiss tournament. You "draw" a game, you "draw with" or "draw against" a player. MaxBrowne2 (talk) 18:10, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The Manual of Style clearly states "Style and formatting should be consistent within an article." If you can prove that "drawing a player" is not proper English, feel free to correct all three instances in this article where that's the formulation. However, until then, keep it consistent. OscarVFE (talk) 23:05, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The MOS only says that the variety of English (American, British, Indian, Australian etc) should be consistent within an article, not that only one way of expressing an idea may be used with an article. It's perfectly ok to say "Smith was killed in a car accident" and "Jones died in a car crash" within the same article, for example. I get the distinct impression that "Carlsen drew Anand" is an Americanism; Americans are more inclined to say "I wrote him" rather than "I wrote to him". "Carlsen drew with Anand", on the other hand, is acceptable in any form of English. "Carlsen drew against Anand" is less common but equally acceptable. This link, definition 13, makes a clear distinction between drawing a game (transitive) and drawing with a player (intransitive). MaxBrowne2 (talk) 01:18, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  You draw games, not players 

message: If Wesley So's performances stated elsewhere on the page are correct, the numbers should make it to that list. But since obviously nobody maintains that list, it should be checked by somebody who knows, and who can decide whether rapid/blitz should be part of it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.90.163.192 (talk) 17:13, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this is a fundamental problem with the article - it needs some kind of reliable source that provides the highest performance ratings. Right now it's a lot of sources for each individual performance, but no source that shows how they compare with each other. Wesley So's 3037 performance isn't listed either. Banedon (talk) 02:46, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, that is indeed the main problem. Still, to muse over what to include if the subsection should be there at all: tournament performance is a tool for master title norms, so the FIDE Handbook stipulates that only classical time qualifies. Yet So's blitz performance could very well be mentioned in a note afterwards, as long as Lasker's is.193.90.163.192 (talk) 21:16, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Performance rating records listed and unlisted 

message: Under "Longest unbeaten streak", I do not see the point of this sentence, "Wilhelm Steinitz went 9 years without a loss (including his 25 consecutive win streak mentioned above), but the streak included only 32 games." If we are going to mention years without a loss, the winner would be Fischer's 20 years 1972-1992! But Fischer temporarily retired, you say? So did Steinitz, pretty well. And if we want to mention a streak in time for an active player, the winner would probably Capablanca's 8 years undefeated 1916-1924 (roughly 65 games). Anyway, without a reliable source saying Steinitz is the record holder by some definition, I think it should be deleted. Adpete (talk) 09:11, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm, I can't verify the record either so deleting it. Banedon (talk) 10:04, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mention of Steinitz under "longest unbeaten streak" 

message: Do we know for sure that this is a record? Sorry but it looks like original research to me. MaxBrowne2 (talk) 10:17, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Most consecutive games of over 100 moves 

message: Grischuk had a 72-minute think yesterday in a the candidates tournament, a top level game. 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bgW9ez5LTX8 They asked if this was his longest think.  I think we need a longest think record.  Obviously we don't want to give it to anyone who tried to get listed here but who sucks.  Perhaps limited to games that really matter somehow.
:I believe the record is held by Brazilian IM Francisco Trois for his 2 hour 20 minute think (back when the time control was 40 moves in 2.5 hours) for his 7th move against Luis Santos at Vigo, 1980. Haven't been able to find anything more reliable than the Guinness Book of Records for this. MaxBrowne2 (talk) 05:04, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: OK I found a reliable contemporary source, the Spanish magazine El Ajedrez from July 1980. Not sure if it's complying with copyright, but it's brilliant to find a first hand source. http://www.historiadelajedrezespanol.es/revistas/el_ajedrez/El_ajedrez_07.pdf The magazine itself can still be cited even if this particular scan disappears from the internet. MaxBrowne2 (talk) 08:59, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: OK it's all there now, complete with accurate citation data and archiving. MaxBrowne2 (talk) 10:23, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs Longest Think in a top-game record  

message: The article currently lists Awonder Liang, but the source it is citing itself states that this is the record for "the youngest chess player in the United States to have beaten a Grand Master in a tournament game of chess". I believe, David Howell (he told this today while commentating) is the youngest:  I will find some more sources to see if anyone else has broken that record, otherwise I will update the article. But, please make sure while adding any records that those are for the world, and not specific to any country
:That's an excellent find, but the article doesn't mention that it was a blitz game. Howell didn't beat a GM at classical time controls until he was 10 (that was Colin McNab). MaxBrowne2 (talk) 05:53, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Youngest player to defeat a grandmaster 

message: Please stop referring to Lalić’s 155 game streak as ‘unconfirmed’—it has long been confirmed and I have now also added a FIDE source (his official FIDE ratings profile) which shows that he had a 155 game streak without losses, beginning in 2010. The edition war in that section needs to end; if you disagree, at least write your opinion here first. Mazedriver (talk) 18:39, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bogdan Lalić’s 155 game streak 

message: This entry refers to a club tournament, in which every club player who entered would have to play two games with every other player
(Neue Berliner Schachzeitung, v. 2 (1865), p. 117).  On 1865-03-10 22 members are reported to have entered, and already in the following issue Neumann is reported to have won first prize because he won all 34 games that he had to play (p. 155): some players have obviously dropped out already. (2nd and 3rd prize winners are announced in later issues, but with no information about how many games they played: it probably is less than Neumann, as one of the players that dropped out (Schulten) was  reported to have played only three games, two of which were against Neumann. 
No complete record seems to exist: we don't know if games actually were played, or if the weakest club players may have  conceded their games. (We know that draws didn't count, and had to be replayed) Nor do we know anything about handicap arrangements. Neumann was considered to be the strongest player of the club: it would be odd if weaker club players had to meet him on equal terms.
Thus, while Neumann won all his games, we don't know as much of the circumstances as would would like to. The term 'tournament' seems to carry more connotations of regular schedule, all really meeting all, etc., and a fairly level playing field, some of which are known to not have been present. Athulin (talk) 09:30, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tournament Record -- Most games won 

message: "In 2005, Reykjavík, Iceland, with eight grandmasters (Jón L. Árnason, Jóhann Hjartarson, Margeir Pétursson, Friðrik Ólafsson, Thröstur Thórhallsson, Helgi Grétarsson, Hannes Stefánsson, and Bobby Fischer) had a higher percentage of resident grandmasters per capita than any other city worldwide; the city of 114,000 had, therefore, one grandmaster per 14,000 residents."
The cited website claims that Be'er Sheva, Israel takes that title. Please change the citation. MistakeReporter (talk) 00:53, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Most Grandmasters per capita 

message: There're clearly quite a few perfect tournament scores, so I think there should be some additional notability to be included here. Fischer's perfect scores at the US Open is clearly notable for example (because it led to a Bobby Fischer prize for anyone who repeats the feat), but I think many of the others can be removed. Banedon (talk) 04:19, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Perfect tournament scores section needs cleanup