Talk:List of tenants in 1 World Trade Center (1971–2001)

message: Wouldn't it be more appropriate to list the floors top-down, so that it would reproduce the building a bit better? — Bill 22:07, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: October 2004

message: Who owned these buildings? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.144.130.82 (talk • contribs) 
:Larry Silverstein Seabhcán 21:55, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Ownership

message: The page Two World Trade Center tenants does not match this one. They should be formatted the same. - Zepheus 21:29, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, and I seem to prefer the format used for the WTC1 tenants. Perhaps we could talk about your suggestion on the discussion page of the WTC2 tenants as well, and see if we could work for a single format for both towers.--Húsönd 23:34, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: page mismatch.

message: I'd like to rename these articles to the standard list style:
*World Trade Center tenants -> List of World Trade Center tenants
*One World Trade Center tenants -> List of tenants in World Trade Center One
*Two World Trade Center tenants -> List of tenants in World Trade Center Two
*Seven World Trade Center tenants -> List of tenants in World Trade Center Seven
Any objections? Seabhcán 08:13, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename

message: The basements were also parts of the towers.
There were floors, with tenants inside. So why aren't they included here?
This list if far better than the one for 2WTC (which has wrong formatting, double floors, etc.) but lacks this important part of the tower.
Here's a diagram of the basement
http://img91.imageshack.us/my.php?image=page146rb.png
So, going from floor 8, there are:
8 - mechanical
7 - mechanical
6
5
4
3
2 - Plaza level
1 - Concourse lovel (main lobby)
B1 - customs
B2 - customs
B3 - customs
B4 - tenant storage / building services
B5 - building services
B6 - two stories (those could be called B6 and B7) deep hole in a bedrock (?)
It would be great if someone would find the tenants on these floors.
Endimion17 3:27, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Makes sense to add 'em - but only once we have some known tenants to list, IMO. --Elvey (talk) 00:49, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: The basements

message: At the very end of the list of the tenants, the following entry can be found: C 	Ann Taylor Loft, NY Coffee Station, Strawberry, Menchanko-Teikeionos. The word Strawberry is linked to the article of the common plant garden strawberry. Also, I found on Wikipedia no company called Strawberry. It seems to be a mistake or a light form of vandalism. I will delete this word from the article with a corresponding comment. White rotten rabbit (talk) 11:04, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: According to two external lists of tenants, there actually is a company called Strawberry. I did an undo on my changes (put the word Strawberry back), but deleted the link to the article about the garden strawberry.White rotten rabbit (talk) 11:24, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It's the name of a shoe retailer, IIRC.--Elvey (talk) 00:49, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Strawberry?

message: I can't provide the material for these three, but I can confirm that CNBC, and CNN both had 2GHz recieve sites on the 110th floor of the building, as well as the State of New Jersey had a two way radio system up there. Unfortunatley, 2GHz sites are licensed by transmitter and not receiver, so there is no real "written" proof of it, and the NJ license was modified to eliminate the WTC site several years ago, so the revision no longer exists on the FCC's website. The other non broadcast tennants, I can not account for. Necrat (talk) 07:33, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: 110th tennants

message: No mention of roof access which was open for access, when winds were i believe no more 5 to 8 mph  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.169.125.42 (talk) 05:58, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  No mention of outside roof access 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on List of tenants in One World Trade Center. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131219055831/http://www.lowermanhattan.info/construction/project_updates/freedom_tower_26204.aspx to http://lowermanhattan.info/construction/project_updates/freedom_tower_26204.aspx
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.cantor.com/locations.htm
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.twa.com/about_twa/at_ct_ticket_offices.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060320154629/http://www.tenantwise.com/reports/wtc_relocate.asp to http://www.tenantwise.com/reports/wtc_relocate.asp
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://mmc.com/136.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:57, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: It erroneously detected http://www.tenantwise.com/reports/wtc_relocate.asp as dead. I both reported is as a false possitive with the link above, and changed the status of the link to Alive on the "Manage individual URLs"-page.  Should I really do this on both these pages, or just on one of these pages? (t) Josve05a (c) 05:06, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: If it's a false positive, you should only really need to report it.  If it's something the bot can fix on it's own, it will do so and leave it at that.  In other cases where the bot still thinks it's dead, it gets reported to me.  In most cases it's because the bot got blocked on the site in question, so it can't ascertain a heartbeat.  So I end up having to whitelist the domain.  If you check here, the log will show I whitelisted the domain and is now no longer an issue.—CYBERPOWER (Chat) 11:41, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Absolutely no reason why we should have this down to the minute, considering that all other dates in infobox are only to the day. – Teratix ₵ 04:06, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overly precise destruction date 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. The article was moved to List of tenants in 1 World Trade Center (1971–2001) (closed by non-admin page mover) TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 09:22, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: List of tenants in 1 World Trade Center →  – To prevent ambiguity since in practice the number 1 and the word "one" are used interchangeably in $X World Trade Center to refer to the new tower. Either that or merge with List of tenants in One World Trade Center. Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis 22:03, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject United States has been notified of this discussion. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 22:47, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject New York City has been notified of this discussion. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 22:47, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Skyscrapers has been notified of this discussion. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 22:47, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 17 March 2022 

message: Wikipedia is not a memorial. I know this was a tragic event but a lot of the red-linked companies listed are just trivial mentions from their relevant lists. I would like to either delink or remove the red-links entirely and instead have this article focus on notable companies situated in the original towers. I also removed a similar list in a different article about a few years ago that was listing victims of the Ghost Ship Warehouse fire for the same reason. I want to figure out which companies merit inclusion in this list and which ones don't. I know 9/11 is a big event but we are an encyclopedia, not a website to memorialize victims and companies. Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis 22:08, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  I feel like a lot of the companies listed are not notable 

message: On the World Trade Center page it says the first tenants moved into the North Tower on December 15, 1970, while the One World Trade Center page states that the first tenants started moving in October 1971. Which is it? --Aaron106 (talk) 18:12, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  1971 or 1970? 

message: Why is there no reference I can find of TJX who lost 7 employees on 9/11/2001? 2600:4040:54D1:F400:31BA:FC02:28FA:4A2B (talk) 03:13, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  TJX Companies 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: withdrawn by proposer.  Dekimasuよ! 03:27, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: List of tenants in 1 World Trade Center (1971–2001) →  – Please place your rationale for the proposed move here. Dekimasuよ! 03:26, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

text: Proposal withdrawn Twin Towers already redirects to the old WTC page. GabrielPenn4223 (talk) 05:22, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 15 January 2024 

message: I dont think Roblox (the game I assume) were tenants on floor 98-100 due to the fact that the company wasnt founded until 2004. Is this vandalism? or is there another Roblox. Bpk365 (talk) 21:35, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roblox?