lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Tiabendazole

message: in my opinion the substance thiabendazole its a fungicid with preserve the enviroment of product area. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.196.163.211 (talk • contribs) 12:01, 18 August 2006
:huh?  --Lendorien 14:28, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fungacide 

message: I have removed the text dump from Rosvenire on 18:35, 7 December 2006 as suspected copy vio. The nature of the text dump stongly suggests that it is a copyright violation. Until the article can be verified as not being copyvio, it should not be readded, though certainly its sources could be used to improve this article. --Lendorien 14:28, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of Text dump 

message: The entry states that  "It is not approved for usage in the EU,[7] Australia and New Zealand[8] or the USA."
I wonder if the situation has changed since the article was last updated.
I bought this week in Michigan a package of mandarine oranges from California, marketed by SunWest, Parlier, CA 93648, which states "May be treated with one or more of the following: Thiabendazole, Ortho phenylphenol, Imazalil, Fludioxonil and/or Pyrimethanil."
First time user
JSMMA (talk) 12:43, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  thiabendazole not approved for use in the USA 

message: The EU does not allow tiabendazole directly as a food additive (e.g. on leaves), but it CAN be used as a fungicide and on citrus fruits (the label should mention whether the zest is edible or not). I have the reference but it is in Dutch.
(EU DIRECTIVE 91/414/EEG, 5 March 2001)
DiederikH (talk) 20:37, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Partially approved in the EU 

message: Was looking for info on a UK company called Bioguard. Was redirected to this article, no mention here of Bioguard.
Lucien86 (talk) 15:19, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bioguard
Talk:Peter Hoagland

message: Its my assumption that the quote "Fundamental Bible-believing people do not have the right to indoctrinate their children. . . " was Hoagland joking,if he even said it. Unless the source of the quote can be cited and a context given I think it should be removed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tjc (talk • contribs) 18:25, August 24, 2007 (UTC) 
Removed the quote as no one offered proof it was said or context for the quote.Tjc 00:52, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Peter Hooton

message: Is there a reason why the Spoony, Sven and Hooton pic goes to the JohnKerry website?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.21.101.250 (talk) 18:27, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: John Kerry

message: http://www.liverpoolfc.tv/lfc_story/1985.htm
"Peter Hooton: I was in the section on the opposite section to the curve that collapsed, where the wall collapsed, so I wasn’t particularly an eyewitness to what started it, but it just seemed to be minor scuffle and minor skirmishes, you’d seen it a hundred times before in every ground in every country. I’ll tell you what, twenty police from the Anfield Road would have sorted that out in 30 seconds and I know that for a fact." About Heysel, may 1985.
I think this is stupid stupid things too say. How can you know things for a fact? You weren't even in that stand. Everythings minor too you, but the rest of Europe think otherwise. Look at the tv-pictures for chr sake.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.39.241.118 (talk) 12:53, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: =

message: There is a factual error regarding Peter Hooton's age and where he spent his childhood. 
He was not born in 1962, but sometime between 1954 and 1959.
I know because I was his friend and neighbour as a young boy. I was born in 1959, Peter was a few years older than me, but not as old as my brother (Eddie Ormsby) who was born in 1954. Hence, 1954-59.
Peter did not 'spend his childhood in Anfield/Everton' (IE. central Liverpool) Peter spent most of his childhood in Old Roan, a some 8 miles out, as did I. He lived on Altway (a main road in Old Roan) with his parents and elder sister Marion. I lived in Bullbridge Lane 5 mins walk away. Ask him! Mike Ormsby (talk) 17:33, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hooton's age 

message: This guy is awesome i contacted him via twitter and told him that when i was a small boy i saw him on mtv and super channel and he retweeted this post 
plus i asked him about his age and he indeed was born 1962.  Look at him on the video of ALL TOGETHER NOW or GROOVY TRAIN he was not 36 or 37 years old when the videos where shot 
he looked very young and he was in his in his 20s i guess like he said via TWITTER  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.2.134.94 (talk) 15:39, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Twitter contact
Talk:Peter Hordern

message: Although hampered by the law on what evidence it can publish, the Guardian today reveals the extent of Mr Hamilton’s covert links with Mr Greer. It also details the network of MPs linked to Mr Greer, including Mr Smith, Sir Michael Grylls, chairman of the backbench trade and industry committee, Sir Peter Hordern, MP for Horsham, and Sir Andrew Bowden, MP for Brighton Kemptown 62.37.48.36 (talk) 15:43, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can somebody add in a section on Cash for Questions
Talk:Peter Horton

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Pico Creek Productions. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 20#Pico Creek Productions until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 20:07, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Pico Creek Productions" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Peter Howitt

message: What part did Peter Howitt have in this film?  He isn't mentioned on the Wikipedia article for it. Haydn01 09:55, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: In the Name of the Father
Talk:Peter Hudecki

message: I'm not sure how or why this article managed to be kept in the most recent AFD.  I suggest that it be reviewed again soon.  JBsupreme (talk) 07:07, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Psion Series 7

message: Don't suppose we could also see the inside do you? *shrug*
I'll add a photo. It's a pity the title's wrong. I've never heard of them called a "Psion 7" - they were always "Series 7" as far as I know.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.187.201.249 (talk) 00:24, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

message: What web browser did the Psion 7 use? Was is some sort of proprietary one, or did it use something like Explorer or Netscape? StrengthOfNations (talk) 14:05, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Psion used a web browser by STNC (see http://web.archive.org/web/19990423045351/http://www.stnc.com/device.htm) and later, by Opera (see http://www.oocities.org/epoc_32/index2.html).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.181.10.218 (talk) 15:42, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Web browser

message: There is a line "a method that is antiquated by modern standards". Firstly what did the writer think the 'S' in USB stands for? Secondly, until very recently wired connectivity connections were still being largely run over CDC/ACM. This was because Serial drivers were available for other mobile bearers such as USB and IR, and therefore it was an ideal protocol to abstract the hardware. Therefore the hardware may be antiquated, but the method is _not_.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.193.79.87 (talk) 00:04, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Connectivity
Talk:Peter Hyams

message: On March 2, 2010, I updated the Trademarks subheading of the Biography section to correctly reflect that the supporting character "Spota" appears in nearly half of his films, not every film.  I included the list of films that the character did not appear. Xin Jing (talk) 20:42, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updated Biography Section 

message: Hyams seems to be the only film director in recent memory who doubles as his own cinamatographer. (I'm discounting small-budget indepenedent directors who do everything.)  If I'm correct about this and he is unique in this respect, it ought to be mentioned. WHPratt (talk) 15:08, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Director / Director of Photography 

message: I just made a small change to the Trademarks section of the page, as the film Stay Tuned is listed as a film in which Hyams did not insert the name Spota into the film. In fact the name Spota is used in a commercial for one of the fictional TV shows featured on the Devil's broadcasting company, in which an announcer introduces a child star by saying "And Tommy Spota as Chuck."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.146.29.54 (talk) 14:52, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Small Change 
Talk:Peter Inge, Baron Inge

message: Just to clarify, adding post-nominals to an infobox is not "cluttering", especially if they are not referenced elsewhere in the infobox. The fact the information is in the article is irrelevant, as most content from the infobox is. OGBC1992 (talk) 23:07, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Two editors have disagreed with you and this is now verging on edit warring. There is no reason for "PC, DL" to appear in the infobox. The infobox already clearly indicates that Inge was a peer and his full postnominals are located just slightly to the left in the lead. The usage here is also inconsistent with similar articles and it makes little sense to cherry pick postnominals to place in the infobox. Abraham, B.S. (talk) 23:37, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: In my view the postnominals are cluttering. They have been added four times now in quick succession which clearly is edit warring. Please read WP:3RR urgently. Dormskirk (talk) 00:43, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Nevertheless, the consensus is not to include the letters so please abide by the consensus. Dormskirk (talk) 09:41, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Post-nominals in infobox
Talk:Broadsword (disambiguation)

message: Tibia? If someone doesn't clarify this in the next few days I'm cutting it
--Peregrine (Preceding incompletely signed comment added by Peregrine (talk • contribs) 12:04, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tibia 

message: I don't think this is a disambiguation page.  It isn't a page with the sole purpose of linking to multiple articles that might alternatively be titled "Broadsword; it simply explains several related meanings of the term.  I think it's really just an article stub.  I'd propose we remove the disambiguation template, which will also mean that people can stop using :Template:Page d to link to it.  Any objections?  TSP (talk) 19:23, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation? 

message: Doesn't "... for four centuries, beginning in the 17th century and continuing until the advent of firearms..." need amendment?  —151.198.251.215 (talk) 02:56, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd say it does. A source from 1911 that claims it was the preferred armament in England until the 21 century? Sounds a bit unlikely. (80.101.36.43 (talk) 19:47, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

text: Does anyone have access to the source book (my library doesn't have it) to verify?  Was this just a typo perhaps? Peter (talk) 01:20, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beginning in which century? 

message: Hi! I am a dispute resolution volunteer at the [Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard]] where this conflict is being discussed. See Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard#Broadsword. Being a DRN volunteer does not imply that I have any special authority or that my opinions should carry any extra weight; it just means that I have not been previously involved in this dispute and that I have a fair amount of experience helping other people to resolve their disputes.
It is perfectly OK to continue discussing things here (I would like nothing better to be told that everyone has reached an agreement and that the services of DRN are not needed) but I would ask everyone to slow down, calm down, and avoid anything that is even slightly close to being a personal comment about another editor while we are working together to reach a resolution.  I notice that this has been at WP:WQA.  Not to put down anyone who participates there, but WP:DRN has a much higher success rate. One reason for this is that at DRN we talk about article content and we do not allow discussion of user conduct. In other words, talk about the article and don't talk about other editors (you can still talk about other editors here, but I advise waiting to see how the DRN case goes). So basically what I am asking is this; More Light and Less Heat. Being calm, cool and logical really helps you to make your point at DRN. --Guy Macon (talk) 00:11, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard#Broadsword]]
Talk:Peter Landin

message: I have been unable to find any support for the claim that 700 in "The next 700 programming languages" was a typo. A while ago, the text said that it should have been 100, and now it says 200. Where does this information come from?
Bringert 15:27, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems that this was miscommunicated. See the article for an updated reason. Again, I will try to get him to record this more formally if possible. — Jonathan Bowen 11:03, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Rod Burstall repeated the "typo" claim in his acceptance speech for an award at ICFP today. No idea what his actual source was, though as he was active in the field at the time he might have had contemperaneous knowledge of it happening. GaneshSittampalam (talk) 22:23, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typo in the title of "The next 700 programming languages"
Talk:Peter Jacobsen

message: Good start, but needs more info and some formatting, plus REFERENCES to get to B class. Aboutmovies 06:56, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Start
Talk:Peter Jay (diplomat)

message: If anyone knows of or can take a suitable photograph of Jay, it would be much appreciated. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:19, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Image request

message: Is it one of Peter's sons who just discovered Byron's presentation copy of Frankenstein in Lord Jay's library? --Orange Mike | Talk 15:16, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Byron connection 

message: Who are the mothers? Rustygecko (talk) 04:26, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: an article in The Observer confirms that he has seven children. Our article on his first wife Margaret Jay, Baroness Jay of Paddington says that she has three children, and the source it cites says that Peter Jay was their father. IMDb indicates three children from each of his two marriages, but this is not a reliable source for Wikipedia. Verbcatcher (talk) 22:44, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Margaret Jay's Wiki page states "Peter Jay then had an affair with their nanny, fathering a child in the process (he originally denied paternity)." 82.6.174.106 (talk) 14:44, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  7 children?
Talk:Peter Julian

message: Given his performance in the Canadian House of Commons concerning a (long) dead investigation where the London Ontario Police found no evidence of sexual assault by members of a junior hockeyteam (re: girl "does" 8 boys, fems and cuk's are upset) is this not a fair section to add to an understanding of the depth of this cuk's cukholdry?
Read here:
Failure to inform minister of Hockey Canada assault contradicted government directive: NDP
'This is is something that has meant victims have not been protected,' NDP MP said Peter Julian said:
https://nationalpost.com/news/politics/failure-to-inform-minister-of-hockey-canada-assault-contradicted-government-directive-ndp 2607:FEA8:2A5D:2C00:3444:1C16:6DAA:4D22 (talk) 13:49, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  MP Peter Julian - supine cukhold?
Category talk:Delaware politicians

message: I started adding some articles about people to this category, but now I am unsure if they should be here or not. I was thinking that some people might not know what position someone like Caesar Rodney held, but would know that he was a Delaware politician. Do you think that there should be only subcategories here, or also articles on individuals? I won't act further until I get a response.
-DJLayton4
:I agree with your concern, but the rules as I understand them is that an article should not be categorized in a parent category as well as a subcategory. This to me is awkward, because sometimes I would like to see all the "Delaware politicians," regardless of office, or all the places in Pennsylvania, and not have to look through each county. One solution is to make a list, but the best would be for someone to program a category article rollup. I have followed the rule because many editors are enforcing it pretty strongly and I prefer the consistency to fighting it. I would recommend others follow it as well, and try and get the programming change made. stilltim 21:40, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Peter Kalifornsky

message: Changed WPBiography from "living=yes" to "living=no," as this individual is deceased.  I'm working on updating the article itself. -- Yksin 20:51, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Peter Kelamis

message: I'd like to argue that. Cartoon Network asked Saban to dub the movie while Ian Corlett was still the VA. Ian Corlett was first and only dubbed Tree Of Might and the Saiyan Saga. 
76.182.183.242 (talk)   — Preceding undated comment added 12:38, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was he really the first english VA for Goku? 

message: Category: Greek-Australian, surely! Please someone add him. 79.103.187.216 (talk) 02:14, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greek-Australian 

message: But he played a crooked area 51 scientist in SG1-6.14  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.254.146.20 (talk) 09:20, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not hugely relevent 

message: "He is arguably best known for playing Goku in the original English dub of the animated television series Dragon Ball Z."
I'd like to argue that. The son of a shepard is not some glowy bright as a light bulb standy up haired super whachamakalit. And what is this mention of the balls of a dragon? What is this filth!? Back in the old country we would never try to wretch off the dangly bits of a fire breathing winged snake!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.25.36.228 (talk) 05:18, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Best known for voicing who now? 
Talk:Peter Kilfoyle

message: One of the given cites has Kilfoyle saying "In the perfect world, Everton would stay roughly where it is, in a modern purpose built stadium." However our WP pages claims he has been criticised "for actively attempting to relocate Everton Football Club out of his constituency" - pretty much the opposite of his "perfect world" view. It seems he supports a move to a new location as he believes that is the only viable location, but the article does not suggest this more balanced view.  The most critical cite seems to be a blog (not WP:RS anyway), and the story seems complex and does not have national level reporting.  It generally this seems a non-encyclopedic item, and I'd propose that the best thing to do is delete this sub-section. Then we could weave the other content of the Controversy section into the main Parliamentary career section, and thus get rid of the Controversy section in line with general WP guidance. Rwendland (talk) 23:48, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  The football "controversy" sub-section 

message: Peter appeared as a 'contestant' on "Have I Got News For You" on the 5th May 2000 (on Paul Merton's side). On it, he said that he was in a group called "The Hungry Eyes" (or Hungry I's) at the same time when The Beatles were making a name for themselves, and also said that he played at The Cavern. This could be a titbit that can be added somewhere.
```` Taff Hewitt (talk) 13:57, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peter Kilfoyle's "Pop" Career.
Talk:Peter King (saxophonist)

message: The subject of this article, Peter King, the alto sax player, is generally referred to as Peter to avoid confusion with Pete King, the tenor sax player who went on to manage Ronnie Scott's Club in London, where, by pure coincidence Peter King played on the opening night. --Technopat (talk) 00:42, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There is now also an article for Pete King (saxophonist) (see explanation above). Given the ongoing confusion over these two sax players, I propose moving this page to a new title such as Peter King (alto saxophone) and the other article to Pete King (tenor saxophone), but won't do so until I get some feedback and/or better suggestions. Am copying and pasting this on the Pete King talk page. Regards, --Technopat (talk) 00:55, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just for the record 

message: These sources do not belong in External links. I have moved the link farm from there to this talk page where they do belong. Warning: I didn't check them to see if they follow criteria per WP policy, so be careful in choosing any potential references I've moved here. Thank you! --Leahtwosaints (talk) 21:30, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  New sources don't belong in External links, but they do belong here!
Talk:Peter Kowalke

message: Articles should be based upon reliable, third-party published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy not just links to the subjects own promotional web site.  Or am I missing something? Lame Name (talk) 16:50, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: In general you are correct. But articles often start based upon a single source of limited quality or based upon primary sources. The solution is to search for and add additional sources and information derived from those sources, not to delete, and particularly not to speedy-delete, articles for which such sources can in fact be found.  DES (talk) 17:02, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I looked and found nothing of note.  The article has been around for three years it is not a new starter.  The third ref does not support the claim in the text and is just a trivial mention that is of no use here. Since when has someone doing a job (butcher, baker, journalist, film editor) been notable?  Lame Name (talk) 17:08, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: If you really think this person is not notable, take it to AFD. This is not an A7 speedy. Notablity is probably marginal, but there appears to have been at least some national media coverage, which is IMO enough to pass the GNG. It is surely enough to avoid a speedy or a Prod. DES (talk) 17:19, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

text: The Boston Globe ref supports the existence of the documentary, and that a major newspaper considered it significant enough to quite from it. The IMDB ref is a third-party source establishing the existence of the documentary and that Peter Kowalke was in fact the producer and editor.  DES (talk) 17:23, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Is anyone questioning that it was not a speedy delete?  Is anyone questioning that the person or the film exist?  Just because something exists it does not mean it is notable.  I have a shelf in front of me containing several books by Dori Smith but there is no Wikipedia article about her.  Lame Name (talk) 19:21, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You tagged it for a speedy delete so obviously you thought is was subject to speedy deletion. I question that -- i thik it is clearly not a speedy. I grant that notability is more than existence. There seems to have been at least one NY Times article on this person, but the NYTimes archives are not available online free of charge after a limited time -- so this would take library research. I think that the notability here is borderline, but the article should not be deleted without community consensus. The person seems to be notable at elast within a limited activist community. DES (talk) 22:40, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  References