lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hate group

message: Recommend to update the list of flags and symbols to more represented sample of it. E.g., to make it more diverse and show more existed forms of hate in this section (e.g., even pick more diverse pool from SPLC Hate groups watchlist: New Black Panther Party or Nation of Islam or whatever more 'inclusive') OR to delete it at all in current version. 
I tried to delete the part shows a visual example of hate groups using misinformation of 'common flags and symbols'. Hate has no faces or borders (in North American context: races, colors, genders) but the ability to evolution and adaption, so it is dangerous to misinform it might 'commonly' exist (only) in old versions of Third Reich SS (not homogeneous national socialist group over time) or other related symbols. Don't know why, but changes were momentally reverted with false statment that I tried to delite all of the article.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:9E01:740:54A:70CB:EB8:31EE (talk) 21:29, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  * So may you argument your point of view to selection of this flags and whatnot? Now I see your point as 'hatred have faces, but I'will decide what faces it have'. Why have we moral right to have bias against sources we use and to pick only parts that prove our views when we edit the Free enciclopedia? Also, I negatively like the unhealthy point of view that 'hatred have faces and flags' and as well as ' links to 'phone memes' they saw somewhere in their informational space. Don't represent your biases, please. Hate haven't got faces, symbols or flags e.t.c, people who acquire ideals of hate have and produce it to identify himself. And, also recommend to avoid American chouvinism in your answers and articles at all. The hate is not only american feature or 'priviledge' at all, as the english language and wiki are. 2600:1700:9E01:740:448C:3DC0:8562:CCF9 (talk) 18:52, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  * I don't believe in credibility and truth in this local talks so made a Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Discrimination#Re-make_'Hate_group'_article_and_check_it_on_bias. Hope would not be deleted as all before. 2600:1700:9E01:740:448C:3DC0:8562:CCF9 (talk) 19:14, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misinformation in flags in symbols/shows only selected forms of hate.  

message: When was the term "hate group" first used or when did it become popularised? What is the etymology of the term? One can see that the use of "hate" in the phrase has a idiosyncratic meaning that is not within the usual definitions of the English word "hate". 110.175.78.214 (talk) 09:38, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conspicuously absent is history or etymology of the phrase
Talk:Stokenchurch

message: Cut and pasted from article:
Loud techno music can often be heard late at night due to the presence of a free raving community
Unless a good reference can be provided for this information I'll not allow it in the article.  If a good reference can be provided please reword the sentence to make it more encyclopedic.  Thank you. -- Graham  :) 21:03, 18 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The last paragraph is very concentrated on the Red Kites.  Although Stokenchurch is probably the best place I know to watch them, perhaps a link to the Red Kite article would be more appropriate? -- IanUK 21:48, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Red Kites 

message: Being an ex-resident, and family going back generations, of Stokenchurch: I was always taught that the original anglo-saxon name meant "church within a stockade".  I believe it was mentioned in this context in the guide to the Parish Church of St Peter& St Paul.  
There was also reference in the same publication of a battle taking place on the escarpment adjoining Beacon Hill and "The Canyon".
Can anyone throw further light on these two queries??
Regards
David J 
David J Johnson (talk) 15:58, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added a reference for the name origin that is listed in the article; I shall have a look at the other info you have provided and see if I can find anything related to that over the weekend. -- roleplayer 17:06, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

text: I have looked into it, and updated the article accordingly.  The battle you mentioned was two skirmishes in the English Civil War, these broke out all across this part of England at this time, and it would appear that neither skirmish was serious enough to have made it into the history books as a "Battle of Stokenchurch".  I have also updated the various arguements as to the village name.  Unfortunately none of them point to the "Stoke" part of Stokenchurch meaning "stockade".  I have looked in my English etymology for the origin of the word stockade and it is actually a compound of Old English and Old French elements, Old English stocc meaning "log" and Old French ade meaning "breast".  The etymology suggests that "stockade" was coined in imitation of the French word "estocade", meaning to thrust in fencing.  So now you know! -- roleplayer 17:44, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

text: Just so that you know, I did make a point of looking for other mentions of a battle talking place in Stokenchurch in the book I consulted today; unfortunately only the Civil War was mentioned. -- roleplayer 19:26, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

text: Hi, if I recall correctly Delafield is mentioned in the Starey and Viccars book though I still think the stockade version is less likely due to the word originating in the French language.  Good find re the battle though, I would go ahead and include that in the article.  Do you have a full reference for the publication you've found? -- roleplayer 11:52, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stokenchurch Original Anglo-Saxon name
Talk:51st state

message: When you move out of your current state, you acquire new representatives (2 Senators and 1 House Rep.) This is always true until you move out of the country. Then you keep your past state Representatives. 
If we live in Wisconsin, then we follow Wisconsin laws. California, California Laws. But South Korea? We don't follow some global standard. we follow a hodgepodge of different state laws. You can't even talk to your friends for advice because they live in different states and follow different laws.
There should be a lot more talk of standardizing registration, voting, and basic needs of American citizens from distinct representatives rather than from my old local representatives that don't think about my needs on a daily or weekly basis. This could be a "virtual" State that has 2 Senators and any number of representatives appropriate
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_diaspora
Ciscorucinski (talk) 19:24, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Statehood for global US citizens 

message: Readers come here from Google looking for the number of votes required in congress to add a state, and I can't seem to find anything about this mentioned in the article. Is it 2/3 majority in both house and senate? Can we add this? Cstanford.math (talk) 21:53, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi! Thanks for bringing this to my attention. I think people would want to know this information. I have added it. It's simple majority in both chambers but the Senate has the filibuster so 60 votes would be needed unless there are reforms to the filibuster which some statehood groups support to enable a simple majority vote in the Senate. If a statehood bill is vetoed, it needs a 2/3 override in both chambers.https://www.vox.com/2020/6/22/21293168/dc-statehood-vote-filibuster-supreme-court-joe-bidenhttps://www.teenvogue.com/story/51-for-51-washington-dc-statehoodhttps://www.csgmidwest.org/policyresearch/1015-Nebraska-statehood.aspx Thanks! -TenorTwelve (talk) 12:01, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

text: That information belongs in the article about the United States constitution. Putting it here would be a duplication. Sam Tomato (talk) 20:05, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vote required to add state? 

message: I see no authority for the term 51st state. Is it a term made up by someone using Wikipedia to create the term or is there an official definition? Sam Tomato (talk) 20:02, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: What do you mean by official definition? It's a phrase that simply fits into what it is associated with, the fact that there are currently 50 states in the United States, so the next would by definition be the 51st state. Doesn't need an official authority, it's simply a mathematical quantity. RegistryKey(RegEdit) 01:30, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Authority
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Academics

message: I am not sure I understand the scope of this project.  Does it exist to serve the extremely important purpose of adjudicateing Acedemic AFDs or is it broader.  If it is a broad project does it have a talk page template.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM)  16:37, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A very good idea. I can work on some other standard pieces to make this a fuller-functioning wikiproject over the next couple of months. --Lquilter (talk) 16:59, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

text: Has a talk page template (e.g., linked by "") been created?  If not, how are articles flagged as part of this WikiProject?  I was contemplating recommending the Otto Frederick Hunziker article, but cannot determine how to do so from the Project Page.--Rpclod (talk) 03:48, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Talk page template 

message: In light of the comments at Template talk:Infobox academic, is there any need for the template, or should it just be redirected to the more general Template:Infobox Scientist? Thanks, Black Falcon (Talk) 22:23, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Redirected on 27 July. –Black Falcon (Talk) 20:17, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template:Infobox academic
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Food and drink

message: There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Chantilly cake#Requested move 1 May 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Wikiexplorationandhelping (talk) 04:15, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move at [[Talk:Chantilly cake#Requested move 1 May 2024]] 

message: The list is found in Template:The_Coca-Cola_Company :  
* Caribou Coffee 
* Costa Coffee 
* Dunkin' Donuts 
* Georgia
* illy
I did not check all of them, but Caribou and Dunkin' Donuts do not mention Coca-Cola or anything close. Costa Coffee is discussed in the article. So, this one is fine. It will be good to know the criteria used. Dominic Mayers (talk) 19:29, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coffee businesses with no mention of coca-cola in the coca-cola company template 

message: Do we have an article (or section of an article) about sweet drop peppers / sweety drop peppers? I can't find anything I'm not sure if it is known by another name. --Jameboy (talk) 16:36, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sweet drop pepper 

message: According to https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/2.37.165.95, ‎"‎sono di mola di bari, le frittelle sono vuote, usano lo stesso impasto del panzerotto ma sono più vicine alle crescentine modenesi che al panzerotto. non so a Molfetta ma secondo me queste americanate sono tutte sbagliate" (English: "I'm from Mola di Bari, the frittelle are empty, they use the same dough as the panzerotto but they are closer to the crescentine modenesi than the panzerotto. I don't know about Molfetta but I think these americanate are all wrong"), this page should be correct. JacktheBrown (talk) 14:14, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Panzerotto]] 

message: There is a dispute going on on Talk:Michelin Guide#Influence on cuisine and working conditions. I like to have more participation on that discussion. Not impossible that I see it wrong... The Banner talk 16:43, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Michelin Guide 

message: Hi editors, I posted an edit request for the Culinary Institute of America to update some of the statistical information about the school. I saw that it was part of this project, would anyone here be willing to review that request? I can't make the changes myself due to a conflict of interest. Cheers BINK Robin (talk) 20:16, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updates to The Culinary Institute of America 

message: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pizzoccheri&diff=prev&oldid=1224692376: does it apply to all types of Italian pasta? In this case, I have to correct several pages. JacktheBrown (talk) 22:34, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Treatment of plural pasta terms in English
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Writing systems

message: I noticed in some Wikipedia articles (e.g. Avestan alphabet, Zoroaster) Avestan letter ⟨𐬚⟩ is transliterated as ⟨θ⟩ but scholars prefer the slightly different Greek letter ⟨ϑ⟩ (open form); for example Gippert.-- Carnby (talk) 15:40, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Avestan letter 

message: There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Pharnavaz I of Iberia#Requested move 6 February 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. RodRabelo7 (talk) 00:42, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move at [[Talk:Pharnavaz I of Iberia#Requested move 6 February 2024]] 

message: There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Armenian alphabet#Requested move 8 May 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Wikiexplorationandhelping (talk) 13:43, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move at [[Talk:Armenian alphabet#Requested move 8 May 2024]]
Talk:Typosquatting

message: Do not give any examples of misspelled  domain names. "examlpe.com"  currently leads to a site that tries to load malware on your computer. Any example you give is likely to be harmful if anybody actually looks at the example page.
One obvious solution would be for the W?F to register a few obvious typos of wikipedia.org and redirect them to the main site. We could then use them as examples, plus it would benefit anyone who makes those particular typos. --Guy Macon (talk) 15:26, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Would it be better to change the extension on the example domain names to .tld (eg: example.tld) as this is not a resolving top level domain? Jmccormac (talk) 19:49, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: That would work. Good thinking! I guess that's why they pay you the big bucks.[Citation Needed] :) --Guy Macon (talk) 20:57, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do '''not''' give any examples of misspelled domain names.
Talk:Haplorhini

message: Someone just went through the article and changed "haplorrhine" back to "haplorhine."  Despite the mixed use in the literature, we need to stick to the latter per the reasons above.  If someone has time to revert it back, please do.  Otherwise, I will try to take care of it after work tonight. – VisionHolder « talk » 14:46, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling revisited 

message: "Haplorrhines are considered to be less primitive than the strepsirrhine" – is there a citation for this? "Less primitive" without context sounds decidedly un-evolutionary and hence unscientific.--77.188.16.131 (talk) 11:48, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Less primitive" 

message: I deleted the reference to Darwinius here because the claim that it is an early haplorhine has been thoroughly debunked. It therefore was not relevant to the entry on Haplorhini (note that Darwinius has its own entry in Wikipedia). See:
Seiffert, Perry, Simons, Boyer. 2009. Convergent evolution of anthropoid-like adaptations in Eocene adapiform primates. Nature 461,1118–1121.
Williams, Kay, Kirk, Ross. 2010. Darwinius masillae is a strepsirrhine – a reply to Franzen et al. (2009). Journal of Human Evolution. 59: 567-573.
Williams, Kay, Kirk. 2010. New perspectives on anthropoid origins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 107: 4797-4804.
PorfirioPhoonman (talk) 19:32, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Darwinius not relevant

message: I am layman reading this, so maybe this is a dumb question, but how is it possible that the suggested beginning of this suborder (70 mya) is before the beginning of the above order of primates at 55 mya?
Dg21dg21 (talk) 14:39, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  how many million year ago? 

message: The last sentence of the introduction suggests (without citation) that haplorhini birth size and length of childhood dependence are based on "increased complexity of their behavior and natural history", which I feel needs clarification. What does "complexity of their natural history" mean? Or does complexity refer just to their behavior? In which case there is no relevant information given about their "natural history", whatever that is supposed to mean. Andraste733 (talk) 12:50, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification on last sentence of introduction: birth size and dependence
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject United Nations

message: An editor has requested that :2023 Guayana Esequiba crisis be moved to :2023 Guyana–Venezuela crisis, which may be of interest to this WikiProject. You  are invited to participate in the move discussion.--WMrapids (talk) 03:21, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion for [[2023 Guayana Esequiba crisis]]

message: Hi all - would someone mind reviewing Draft:Taiwan and the United Nations and accepting it if appropriate? I have populated the draft with a lot of content to warrant a separate article (from China and the United Nations), and it is well sourced in my opinion. Happy to get any feedback here as well! Butterdiplomat (talk) 16:47, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help with reviewing a draft 

message: There is a requested move discussion at Talk:United Nations Conciliation Commission#Requested move 7 March 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Killarnee (talk) 23:57, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move at [[Talk:United Nations Conciliation Commission#Requested move 7 March 2024]] 

message: A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :United Nations Office is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United Nations Office until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Moscow Mule (talk) 18:07, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomination of [[:United Nations Office]] for deletion
Talk:Lemuridae

message: Well it depends who we are. It is the standard for how we do things on the NL wikipedia. Consider; what is the point of the box OTHER that to provide a context. The body is where you want to tell ABOUT your subject. With Lemurs, the genus belongs with the family therefore in the body of the text. GerardM 14:08, 25 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  February 2004 

message: It seems to me that this is an interesting thing to note about lemurs in general, so I put the reference under Lemuridae, but it could just as easily (or as a duplicate) on under True lemur. Hmmm, it just occurred to me that the best way to do it might be to put a general statement in Lemuridae and the specific reference in True lemur. What do you think?
- Longtrekhome 13:35, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added reference about hybridization in Eulemur 

message: Um, just a thought (and trying to help, because I like Wiki, but it gets a bad rap for this sorta thing) - it is highly unlikely that any Ancient Roman ever set foot on Madagascar in order to name a Lemur.  I don't think there needs to be a citation on this statement, I think it probably needs to be removed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.27.175.223 (talk) 03:21, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Factual Problem
Talk:Lemur

message: The Pleistocene was not in the Paleogene as you can see in the box on top of article please fix the shadow because it shows Paleogene or fix the title from Pleistocene to Paleogene 71.254.13.155 (talk) 10:37, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done for now: Please explain what you mean when you say "fix the shadow because it shows Paleogene". I understand that the article should say Pleistocene and not Paleogene but it doesn't say Paleogene once except "To further complicate the issue, several Paleogene fossil primates from outside Madagascar, such as Bugtilemur, have been classified as lemurs" which seems appropriate. Waddie96 (talk) 16:44, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 29 April 2018 

message: What is the rationale for having etymology and rationale for name as two separate sections? Would it be better to combine the two sections into one titled "Etymology"?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by AngstyHippo (talk • contribs) 14:52, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology section 

message: I've begun a discussion at Talk:Taxonomy_of_lemurs#Horvath_v_Orlando_v_newer? UtherSRG (talk) 13:43, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phylogeny update? 

message: @Hemiauchenia, I noticed that with the edits you've made to the lead, the last paragraph is now quite long, and includes some information redundant to the rest of the lead (e.g. describing Archaeoindris twice). Would you be able to go through the lead to ensure it conforms to MOS:LEAD at an FA level? Sdkb talk 01:48, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. Hemiauchenia (talk) 01:53, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead concerns
Talk:Cheirogaleidae

message: There really should be a picture of this little critter. Jack 16:43, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: A discussion that may influence the use of the Superfamily Cheirogaleoidea is underway at WP:PRIMATE. If you have an interest in this topic, please join the discussion. –Visionholder (talk) 03:10, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion about Superfamily Cheirogaleoidea 

message: Note to self (or anyone else wanting to contribute): Usefully information about cheirogaleid diversity can be found around tables 2 & 3 of the following article:
* 
I will try to add this when I re-write the article at a later date. – VisionHolder « talk » 22:25, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Future reference 