Talk:The Collector

message: The "books, TV and music" sections are pure original research; they are pure speculation with no citations backing them up. I would like to remove them.
Treybien 3:22 8 August 2007 (UTC)
This book inspired serial killer Leonard Lake to abduct women and keep them as slaves. He along with Charles Ng are a farely well-known killing duo, it might be worth noting on this page. Lake gave his plans the name "Operation Miranda", after the character in the book. There is also more of note to it, look it up if you like.
It seems that it also inspired the captor of Natascha Kampusch
:There is no evidence that her captor had knowledge of either the book or the film; and there are even indications that he did not like to read at all. Because there are stark similarities between her abduction and The Collector nevertheless, I left a cautious remark in the German article of :de:The Collector.--Keimzelle 21:54, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: How do we know Lake was inspired by this book? Is there any reference to this? As for Natascha Kampusch's captor, it must be said that abductions like this were not new when "The Collector" was written. --Amandajm 08:44, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Original research

message: Is Tie Me Up! Tie Me Down! too different to be linked from a See also section? --Error 22:50, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: See also

message: I'd like to divide this into two articles.  One on the book, one on the film.  The book is really more important, and right now the article has a film infobox.  Would anyone object to a split here? --JayHenry 21:58, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I also agree and have added the split tag to the main page. I may get back to this page to help later. But many of you are better at doing this than I am so please feel free to take the bull by the horns. MarnetteD | Talk 01:53, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Having a book article with a film infobox is really confusing, and the tag has been here very long. I'm not very familiar with the topic, but I think I'll split it for the sake of better organization. :) --PeaceNT (talk) 10:45, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anyone object to a split? 

message: :Image:Collector sheet A.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 19:52, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Collector sheet A.jpg

message: I've gone through the plot summary and changed all instances of Grey to Miranda.  I am aware that the Manual of Style calls for surnames, but this is only when referring to real people.  Calling her Miranda seems more appropriate, but please discuss if you disagree. --Richardrj talk email 13:29, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with you, Richard.  If it was a page on Romeo and Juliet, we wouldn't constantly refer to the lead characters as Montague and Capulet.  TimothyJacobson (talk) 00:22, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grey/Miranda 

message: I've removed the last two paragraphs from this section as they appeared to be one reader's personal remarks on the book. Kevinfr (talk) 12:40, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fowles' own explanation of the purpose behind 'The Collector'" 

message: Some of Clegg's bizarre behavior--his social isolation, his inability to gauge human emotion or understand proper social norms, his aversion to Mirands's physical overtures--suggest autism. Could this have been one of the earliest works of literature to explore a still largely misunderstood disease?   --The_Iconoclast (talk) 11:58, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was Clegg autistic? 

message: From my personal view, the whole rambling seems exasperatingly arrogant and prig, and incredibly self-contradictory. He says for a while in a downright contemptuous and discriminatory manner about the "division" between people, which I hardly believe anyone living in a democratic society in the late 20th century would utter(incredible nonsense like "gained by those intellectually unsuited to handle it.", "biological superiority" etc), and at the exact same time talks about "achieving truly born equal" and "the dividing line should run through each individual, not between individuals." which seem to be genuine egalitarian causes.
The first paragraph in that section doesn't have any quotes. I'm not sure whether it's accurate.
If what's presented here is indeed what the author intended to reflect, it is an incredible mess. I don't believe even a 10-year-old would write/think so disastrously.
No wonder he is not a celebrated writer at all. This kind of thinking pattern is downright appalling, immature and inconsistent in itself. http://www.newcriterion.com/articles.cfm/John-Fowles-and-his-big-ideas-6166
Well anyways, just another example of half-baked author which abound in our society. No surprise.
Anon J (talk) 08:03, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are you sure the "background" section is right? 

message: In a July 2014 interview, Samantha Eggar claims that John Fowles based The Collector on an actual incident in England in which a bank clerk who had won big in the football pools abducted a local shop girl and kept her prisoner. Can anyone corroborate? The News Hound 04:55, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Based on a true story? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on The Collector. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150210032634/http://www.crimelibrary.com/serial_killers/predators/wilder/9.html to http://www.crimelibrary.com/serial_killers/predators/wilder/9.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070921114544/http://www.crimelibrary.com/serial_killers/predators/bob_berdella/10.html to http://www.crimelibrary.com/serial_killers/predators/bob_berdella/10.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:58, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: There are two sections that deal with adaptations and real criminals, should there be an "In popular culture" entry about the two Criminal Minds episodes that heavily involve this book and its plot? The episodes are Season 1, Episode 22, and Season 2, Episode 1.
Paulvoltairewiki (talk) 21:57, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should the Criminal Minds episodes be included?