lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hyperoglyphe antarctica

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 09:22, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 
Template talk:UnsignedIP2

message: Where is the documentation to this template?
--Jerome Potts (talk) 06:59, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, done.  At some point, we should get around to writing a /doc page for it, though. Powerlord 19:18, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Note that these days you almost never need to use these templates because of SineBot ∴ AlexSm 20:06, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

text: Documentation moved from top of this page to template page. 209.244.43.122 (talk) 20:03, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Usage, please? 

message: Please add :Category:Wikipedia templates to be automatically substituted - not knowing it should be, I just transcluded a whole bunch of unsigned templates, and it would be nice if the bots knew to substitute it. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 17:07, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit protected withdrawn

message: I have made a series of changes to the doc for . There is no reason that the doc for  can't match that template aside from the reversal of parameters. Toward that end, I plan to replace the  doc with a modified clone of the  doc, but I'll wait a couple of weeks for the latter to restabilize. If there is any reason I shouldn't do that, now is a good time to say so. ―Mandruss ☎ 11:11, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doc replacement planned
Talk:Account manager

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot (talk) 07:07, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: okay pleace del the artical and unbane my account 182.181.24.1 (talk) 06:01, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: pleace deletemmy account 182.181.24.1 (talk) 06:06, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-11-30 Automated pywikipediabot message
Talk:Dan Dworsky

message: The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.
*If there is not a free use image in the top right corner of the article, please try to find and include one.[?]
*Per Wikipedia:What is a featured article?, Images should have concise captions.[?] 
*You may wish to consider adding an appopriate infobox for this article, if one exists relating to the topic of the article. [?] (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD)  15:19, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Auto Peer Review 

message: :GA review (see here for criteria)
#It is reasonably well written.
#:a (prose):  b (MoS): 
#:: 
#It is factually accurate and verifiable.
#:a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
#:: 
#It is broad in its coverage.
#:a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
#:: 
#It follows the neutral point of view policy.
#:Fair representation without bias: 
#:: 
#It is stable.
#:No edit wars etc.: 
#:: 
#It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
#:a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
#:: 
#Overall: 
#:Pass/Fail: 
#:: </div>
Specific issues:
* College football section, the first paragraph is only one sentence, and the last paragraph is only two sentences. Such short paragraphs give the prose a choppy feel, and probably would read better if the three paragraphs in this section were combined into just one paragraph.  ResolvedCbl62 (talk) 16:11, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I see some work is being done, let me know when everything is finished! Ealdgyth | Talk 18:53, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks great! I've gone ahead and passed it and am working on the epaperwork now. Ealdgyth | Talk 00:46, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: GA review
Talk:Jim Detwiler

message: For the time being, I do not feel that the article meets the GA criteria. The text is short, stiff and uncompelling, althought it is extremely well-sourced for such a short article. There are also some vital things missing, such as his birthdate, which, to me, means it isn't comprehensive enough. -- Scorpion0422 20:30, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA review

message: "Detwiler received a $50,000 signing bonus and played in a couple preseason games in 1969, but his knee was still hurting. He had more surgery on the knee and missed the entire 1967 season.[3] He failed to make the team in 1968, and his professional football career was over. He is the most recent 1st round NFL Draft choice to have never played a game in the NFL."  If he didn't make the team in 1968, does that mean he made it in 1969 and played only in the preseason?  The order doesn't make sense to me, or the years are incorrect.  I don't know the fact to correct it.Vettrock (talk) 10:00, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Years of NFL play
Talk:Duggirala

message: As both the articles talk about the same place, only one of these should remain an article page with the other made into a redirect. I propose that Duggirala be retained as the article title as it is a more commonly used spelling. --Gurubrahma (talk) 19:23, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Duggiralla into... 
Talk:Ketchup as a vegetable

message: I propose that the "Greed" Link in See Also be removed, as it seems dubious and a possible NPOV violation. The Childhood Obesity link seems suspect as well.
The picture is hardly relevant 99.225.198.95 (talk) 00:26, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article

message: Lawyer asks secretary for ₤4 to dry clean his suit.  Non-notable, but sufficiently strange/known to mention? - RoyBoy 04:21, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unrelated, but another Ketchupgate mention? 

message: Hi All-
I have found several factual errors on the current Ketchup is a Vegetable page, and wanted to make those corrections. In addition, I would like to increase the number of citations -- including links to the original legislation passed by Congress and signed by President Carter and to the FNS’ proposed regulations to President Reagan -- and add in some more context to the scandal. Please let me know any thoughts or concerns.
For your background, I am taking a university course, and my final project is to make a 3,000 word or more contribution to a Wikipedia article, while adhering to Wikipedia's rules of neutral point of view and no original research. This page was of interest to me, and I thought my contributions could benefit everyone. Thanks in advance for your feedback.Kth2e (talk) 20:47, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ok to Enhance This Page?
Talk:Gone-Away Lake

message: I've never heard of this award, so I did a google search and the only references to it lead back to this article. Does it exist? Has anyone ever heard of it? There's an Appalachian Book Award, but this book didn't win it, that I could find. I'm removing the reference. Please feel free to put it back in with a footnote if you find it.Tlqk56 (talk) 23:02, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lalachicachan Award in 1972?
Talk:Savoury (dish)

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot (talk) 07:50, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-11-30 Automated pywikipediabot message 

message: Should be "Savoury (dish)" not "Savoury (small dish)". Maikel (talk) 13:12, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Page moved to "Savoury (dish)". North America1000 13:40, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Lemma
Talk:Dingmans Ferry, Pennsylvania

message: I added NPOV tag on "cheap" mayor - likely a cheap insult. -RedBlade7 (talk) 08:10, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed that content, as well as the bit about him being a "Mercedes-Benz enthusiast." The information is unencyclopedic and unuseful. Another question seems more evident - how is there a mayor of this "unincorporated town" if "there is no elected mayor of Dingmans Ferry"? What this article needs are REFERENCES. Alekjds talk 08:27, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Cheap" mayor NPOV issue?
Talk:Lacosamide

message: The information in this edit is entirely uncited, and furthermore, the portion pertaining to the drugmaker's intent to "unschedule" the drug could potentially be seen as defamatory since no citation is given. As this might be seen as libelous, I am reverting the edit. Animated Cascade talk 01:40, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert edit 291482867 

message: The end of the off label use section begins: "AEDs are often used in the treatment of hepatic and renal disease." It seems the intent of this portion is to note that the drug is removed by treatments for hepatic and renal disease and this needs to be taken into consideration. However, this sentence implies that, somehow, AEDs are beneficial for these diseases. This is NOT true. Some AEDs cause damage to these organs over time. In fact, healthy patients are often given tests to make sure damage from AEDs is detected early. However, most newer AEDs are harmless. But, none, to my knowledge, and the sources given, are beneficial. I'm removing those two sentences.
96.240.167.251 (talk) 21:00, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Off Label Use 

message: This ist not a homoserine derivative, but a methyl ether of serine. --FK1954 (talk) 15:47, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  chemical name
Talk:Port of Tauranga

message: I am still looking for better port images - can anyone provide any? Ingolfson (talk) 07:48, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Try the port website, they have aphot gallery or else contact them directly Simba265 (talk) 23:31, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Sadly, companies generally are a waste of time on these things. The guy who responds will not be willing or able to provide photos under a Wikipedia-compatible license (because that would be "giving away company property"!!!) and those who could make the decision won't care enough to be bothered. May be diffferent in individual circumstances, it's true. Ingolfson (talk) 04:48, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 

message: As a former NZ resident, I decided to implement the request to replace the list with regular text.  When doing so, I severely pruned the later entries, which seem to have come from publicity material, while amplifying some of the earlier ones.  I also added a citation for at least some of the material Chrismorey (talk) 13:44, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:Kontiolahti

message: Why is there a link to Koli, which is not in Kontiolahti?
Matti (talk) 08:39, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Template talk:Port Washington Branch

message: Can anyone get the Grand Central link on here to connect properly on the diagram?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.37.252.224 (talk) 19:14, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Let me see if I can take a swing at this.... --IndustryPlantCooper (talk) 16:57, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: You’re right. This is impossible. Let me see if I can find someone who can figure this out. --IndustryPlantCooper (talk) 17:11, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

message: This template needs to be fixed and updated to properly reflect the opening of LIRR access to Grand Central. I just tired to alter this to reflect the changes and all it did was make things worse. We need a user who knows how to work these template to update this template which is frankly in bad shape as of right now. --IndustryPlantCooper (talk) 17:13, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: , see here. Cards84664 06:32, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks!! Well done. And if I can be completely honest, I think you deserve a shiny gold medal for this! 😊 --IndustryPlantCooper (talk) 16:13, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Template needs to be fixed and updated
Talk:Battle of Grocka

message: The Austro-Turkish War, 1737-1739 remove in the article Russo-Turkish War (1735–1739), and this Battle the part of the Austro-Turkish War.  Doncsecz 17:12, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The name of the Ottoman commander was Silahtar Damat Mehmed Pasha. I editted it; now it is İvaz Mehmet Pasha. Ivaz Mehmet is the correct name and it is well sourced. (Also it complies with the list of Ottoman grand viziers). But I noticed that the former name was also sourced. I wonder if the two names refer to the same person. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 07:46, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Nedim, I'm no expert on the subject, but it does seem that the two names (Silahdar Damat Mehmed Paşa and İvaz Mehmet Pasha) refer to the same person. Just a matter of different translations, I imagine. (And sorry for the late reply - I saw your message on my talk page, but completely forgot to respond. Sorry!) Best, faithless (speak) 20:27, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  İvaz Mehmet
Talk:University of Michigan basketball scandal

message: I am sorry but all this talk about Ed Martin being a booster is a lie.  My Uncle who has contacts through the boosters said no linkage exists between Martin and the U of M boosters.  What I would like to see some evidence outside of Newspapers that show Martin was in effect a booster.  --Mihsfbstadium (talk) 08:50, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A newspaper reference is a good enough reference for Wikipedia.  Wikipedia is not the place to be determining the "booster" status of Ed Martin.  The article should just be stating published information.  See WP:OR. X96lee15 17:40, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I understand.  I did dig through the Mlive link provided from the article.  Only one newspaper said he was booster.  The ann arbor and detroit presses tend to call him just by his name or as an electrician at the plants.   In anycase one paper did state from Jalen Rose who was a member of the Fab 5 that he was not a booster but rather a detroit local that followed the local scene and helped the low income great basketball players out.  I think Jalen in the paper said he would give players coats if they needed them.  --Mihsfbstadium 00:03, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Older talk page posts

message: It's unusual to have an entire article about this guy, and not have a wikipedia entry for Ed Martin; he deserves at least a stub-class bio before this article goes to "good article" status.  Edward Vielmetti (talk) 19:02, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: some places to start: NY Times obituary of Ed Martin.  where was he born?  which auto factory did he work for?  who was he before he got involved in this?  Edward Vielmetti (talk) 19:06, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ed Martin 

message: This article should be entitled Ed Martin scandal, which is the name overwhelmingly used for it.  Absolutely no one refers to it by the current title.  I don't know if this is an attempt at political correctness or what, but it's just silly.  Go with the name that people actually use. 24.11.127.26 (talk) 01:00, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename
File talk:Svalbard signatories.png

message: I have uploaded this image to Commons! Jakro64 (talk) 08:58, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. I added it, in blue. Heitordp (talk) 08:47, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

text: Ukraine did not ratify this treaty. Heitordp (talk) 08:47, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

text: I added Ireland. Heitordp (talk) 08:47, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Talk:Sarda River

message: This artcle should be merged with that on Mahakali river which is the source river and is also the border river between India and Nepal. A Treaty has been signed in December 2006 between India and Nepal on sharing of waters  and development of projects oo this river. These will be added to the main text of the Mahakali river. Nvvchar (talk) 10:00, 30 November 2007‎ 
:Mahakali River was merged in on 20 December 2007‎. I'm not entirely clear about the various Kali rivers, but AIUI Kali River (Uttarakhand) needs merging as well. I'll leave that one to someone else, but I'll tag accordingly.FlagSteward (talk) 10:52, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger

message: Synopsis
Two village development committees named as Dodhara and Chandani of Kanchanpur District are seen entirely apart even thourgh they are Nepalese Territory. In order to link these two VDCs with the national mainstream socially, culturally and economically it was necesary to construct a bridge over the Mahakali River, linking these VDCs with the rest part of the country. With the view of national integration and streamlining of the people residing over these two VDCs into the national mainstream,Government of Nepal initiated the construction of Dodhara-Chandani Mulitspan Pedestrian Bridge from the Fiscal Year 057/58. This bridge is recently completed and opened for pedestrian traffic. In emergency situation this bridge can be used for light weight three wheeler vehicles.This bridge may be the largest suspension bridge for pedestrian traffic in the world.
Major Features of the Bridge
Name                        	Dhodhara Chandani Multispan Suspension Bridge
River                       	Mahakali
District                    	Kanchanpur
Present Population Benefited	35403
Total Length                	1452.96 m
Width                       	1.6 m
Height of Tower             	32.72 m
Nos. of Tower               	8
Span between two towers     	225.4 m
Completion date             	April 13,2005
Little.suru (talk) 09:11, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Dodhara Chandani Multispan Pedestrian Bridge
Talk:Marie Woolfolk Taylor

message: The New Georgia Encyclopedia Online has an article on Marie Woolfolk Taylor.  It is probably better to use this as a source rather than the sorority chapter, since it's available and has the same info.--Parkwells (talk) 21:26, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: The box says her parents were Carrie Lucas and Charles Berry, but these were the parents of another founder, and neither name bears any relation to hers. Is this an error? --Parkwells (talk) 00:53, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Parents?
Talk:Programming complexity

message: Not sure why, but Ref #4 leads to an Access Denied XML snippet
Hydrogen18 (talk) 02:34, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference #4 leads to Access Denied XML snippet 

message: I'm marking this article as Stub-class for a start, for the low quality of remaining content. But software metrics are important, so the importance is Mid (it could be High indeed). --Blaisorblade (talk) 03:46, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment 

message: It has been suggested [by User:Groupthink] that Cyclomatic complexity be merged into this article or section. (Discuss)
That's OK with me, especially with this page (Programming Complexity) becoming a redirect to Cyclomatic complexity. Erudecorp ? * 09:16, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: This article confuses together the complexity of an algorithm (mentioned in the given link), and the complexity of production of the software in software engineering (see cyclomatic complexity, the link to Software crisis). As it stands, the article is of such low quality to deserve almost complete deletion of content; the topic is important however, and it deserves a page on Wikipedia. Possibly, however, this page could be simply changed into a redirect to Software metrics, or merged into it (I'll propose a merger with that article).
To start fixing it, I'm removing everything about algorithmic complexity, including the (undiscussed) merger proposal, and the single reference (which is about algorithmic complexity). I hope there is no need to open a discussion to close the merger proposal.
--Blaisorblade (talk) 15:52, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion on the subject
Talk:St. Paul University Manila

message: This article sounds like a promotion more than an independently-written or sounding exposition of the topic
202.128.48.21 (talk) 09:41, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Raby Castle

message: At the moment, the article uses  as a source. It is available through http://www.british-history.ac.uk/report.aspx?compid=76308 British History Online]. Using ctrl+f I was unable to find "Raby" and "Nevill" occured just twice. This is concerning as it looks as if the referenced part of Surtees is irrelevant to this article. Nev1 (talk) 19:48, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: There's some material on p. 109 of a similar titled book by William Fordyce - here. But in either case I'd be treating it with real care, given the age of the source. Hchc2009 (talk) 21:28, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The age of the sources is proving to be an issue, the article might need a rewrite. Nev1 (talk) 21:32, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd agree - there's been enough more recent work on Raby that the article shouldn't be having to rely on 1820s scholarship... Hchc2009 (talk) 21:36, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Surtees as a source

message: http://www.flickr.com/photos/britishlibrary/11244425113/
©Geni (talk) 00:52, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Added, thanks. Nev1 (talk) 19:02, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Plan of the castle
Talk:David Campbell (poet)

message: I have commenced a tidy-up of the Bibliography section using cite templates for books and articles, as well as tables for organising short stories, poems and/or book reviews. Capitalization and punctuation follow standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, as much as Wikipedia templates allow it. ISBNs and other persistent identifiers, where available, are commented out, but still available for reference. This is a work in progress; feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 03:00, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The list of Poetry and Story collections is now complete. I don't believe anything is served by compiling a full list of Campbell's poems as there approx 750 of them. Perry Middlemiss (talk) 05:22, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography 

message: The section talking about Mullion Park feels a bit out of place. Even though it briefly touches upon Campbell's legacy, it focuses too much on the architecture of the park which is irrelevant.Sensitivesushi666 (talk) 19:25, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mullion Park Section