lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Vehicle Certification Agency

message: Type Approval should always be spelt with capitalised leading letters, as shown on the VCA websites.  78.32.143.113 (talk) 21:40, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Type Approval
Talk:List of political parties in Norway

message: Verifiable data from Beer Unity Party should be merged into this article. Northamerica1000 (talk) 07:42, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:The Splasher

message: I am very surprised that no one has started this article yet. This could really use a picture, if anyone has a fair use image. Slugmaster (talk) 07:19, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

message: I started this article when I was studying up on the history of the Splasher. While searching for "The Splasher", in quotes, on google comes up with 14,000 hits, there was no wiki article, so I started one. The Splasher was covered in international news magazines, including multiple articles in the New York Times, which went so far as to publish his/her entire 16-page manifesto. I fail to see how or why this warrants speedy deletion. 
If you are not convinced, please see the following:
* NYT
*NYT
*NYT
* New York Magazine
* Guardian
I could continue for a while citing articles on why this should be kept. Slugmaster (talk) 07:43, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: RE: Speedy Deletion
Talk:Frank Goettge

message: The first citation in this entry states that the Japanese used white flags as a ruse during thieir attacks on the patrol. Ther source then cites the Hague Convention on the use of such ruses.... it says nothing of the Japanese using such tactics. I can find no cited source stating that the Japanese used such a tactic during this raid. Phillip B. Frank's "Guadalcanal" a landmark account of this battle says nothing about the use of white flags as a ruse. 
Can we remove this section as it is not a citation to back up a statement. Canadaman1 (talk) 18:45, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  REMOVE THE FIRST CITATION:PURPORTED USE OF WHITE FLAGS 
Talk:Neptune's Daughter (1914 film)

message: Why is the information regarding the water tank accident that occurred while making this film not here? Lack of citation? It's well documentated and there is an available link to The Argus a Melbourne newspaper that picked up the story from 
New York for the Feb 5, 1914: 
 
http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/7268040
as well as an article form a Bermuda news source that mentions the tank accident:
http://bernews.com/2010/12/video-neptunes-daughter-resurfaces/
how to add this information--anyone please assist- thanks
69.249.125.97 (talk) 19:46, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  How to add Water Tank Accident?
Talk:The Tick (2001 TV series)

message: There are 12 or 13 episodes (I forget which) on the DVD set, including several unaired ones. Why aren't they listed and described? WilliamSommerwerck (talk) 21:50, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: unaired episodes

message: Tick 2016 (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/on-demand/2016/08/21/the-tick-amazon-review/), its like an answer to One-Punch Man. I hope it has levels of depth in its absurdity and the characters able to somehow able to function with a sense of borderline parody of silliness and adrenaline pushing. I wish those suits were better, at least with a pre-2005 level of glamour. It all now looks like old power rangers style. Love to see a detailed article on wiki.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.88.210.206 (talk) 04:52, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Add an article for the new Tick series

message: The article mentions that the Mill Creek DVD has the episodes in "Air Date Order" - also used in the article - but , states these are NOT the production order.  The problem I see , is that nowhere is the production order given.
If "Production  Order" , is the order of the original 2003 "Sony" DVD release , they are: "Pilot" / "The Terror" / "Arthur Interrupted" / "The License" / "Arthur Needs Space" / "Couples" / "The Funeral" / "The Tick vs. Justice" / "The Big Leagues".
It should also be noted , among the commentaries by Barry Sonnenfeld & Ben Edlund , there is no mention of un-aired / un-released episodes. 75.104.163.77 (talk) 17:18, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Air Date Order" vs. "Production Order" ?
Talk:Reckitt

message: The term "Powerbrands" is a corporate term and it should be clearly marked as such in the article. It must not appear to be an assessment made by Wikipedia about the company's various brands. We should use another, neutral term for the best-selling, most known Reckitt brands, noting that the corporate term for them is "Powerbrands", of course properly attributed. -The Gnome (talk) 19:23, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Powerbrands"? 

message: Under "Controversies", should probably include recent revelations that despite CEO Laxman Narasimhan promising to exit the Russian market in April 2022 due to their war of aggression against Ukraine (Narasimhan later resigned in Sep 2022), the company has since decided to renege on its former CEO's commitment to leave Russia. In continuing to drag their feet and delay their exit, they risk their Russian assets being seized and nationalized as Putin did to Danone and Carlsberg this past week. BulldogPunch (talk) 17:37, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversies: Continued sales in Russia 

message: The article needs several updates to account for brands which have been disposed of, including Scholl and E45. There might be others I've missed.
Sources for those two brands: 
* https://www.karohealthcare.com/karo-pharma-completes-the-acquisition-of-the-e45-brand-from-reckitt/
* https://www.reuters.com/markets/deals/reckitt-sell-e45-skincare-brand-karo-pharma-268-mln-2021-12-24/
DDFoster96 (talk) 17:35, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Former brands 

message: The redirect Bang and the dirt is gone has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Rusalkii (talk) 21:45, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Bang and the dirt is gone]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:The Daily of the University of Washington

message: https://www.dailyuw.com/opinion/article_fbe3722a-a901-11eb-9b60-bfd0ee0e37e4.html
https://www.dailyuw.com/news/article_3c1279c4-aecd-11eb-bca8-dbdaf10a9c4d.html
Here are two articles about it. I feel like there would be a lot to talk about. ChessPiece21 (talk) 13:28, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Would a section about the 2021 Daily/ASUW controversy be a good thing to add?
Talk:Danh Quach

message: I've restarted this article based on the available sources (which are all pay-per-view, so I can only create a stub). Didn't realise it had already been speedied, I just saw User:Jentri add a redlink for the guy and decided to check it out. Not as many sources as Frank Jao but he still apparently played a big role in the development of Little Saigon; was described as a "well-known financier" in his community as early as 1989. Is there anything useful in the deleted revisions to expand on this? He was apparently also involved in a lawsuit in 2000 to get a tenant in one of his shopping centres to take down a pro-communist display; only internet source I can find for it is a college paper , but I recall reading about it at the time, so I'm sure there must be a better summary of the case on microfilm in a library somewhere ... cab (talk) 08:00, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks good. Speedy definitely doesn't apply this time. Good luck with your research. Cheers, Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 08:04, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Recreated

message: The protests prompted by the store owners lasted for 52 days, culminating in a candlelight vigil where upwards of 15,000 people participated and was national news . DHN (talk) 16:27, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protest lengths
Talk:Police Academy (TV series)

message: Is there ANY proof that a DVD was released?
If not then someone needs to take down that bit of info.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Paula Bunion (talk • contribs) 04:54, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  DVD??? 

message: I think this article should be the one titled "Police Academy: The Series", as the animated shows intro shows the title as "Police Academy" followed by the words "The Series", while the live action shows intro only show the title as "Police Academy".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.44.161.103 (talk) 01:43, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:Quai d'Orsay (cigar)

message: I noticed that the header underneath the logo was off centered,and so I added a bunch of spaces to center it. I’m sure there is a better way to do this, but I don’t know how to AmazingFerret (talk) 05:10, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Small header under logo off centered
Talk:Warren S. Brown

message: This article was deleted with a PROD of which I wasn't notified.  The Admin who deleted it has restored it, agreeing that the subject is indeed notable. I've added some refs and more assertion of notability. NBeale (talk) 07:59, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Restoration & Notability

message: The domain name for the Travis Research Institute has changed. Therefore the "reference link" to Dr. Brown's Agenesis of the Corpus Collosum on the Travis Research institute webpage is  now broken. I was not given the option to edit the reference link. Please change it to:
www.travisresearchinstitute.org/acc
Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.46.162.110 (talk • contribs) 18:32, 16 January 2015‎ (UTC)
:Done. --82.136.210.153 (talk) 20:34, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Request Edit
Talk:3rd Shock Army

message: Just curious why the article structure was destroyed?--mrg3105mrg3105 If you're not taking any flack, you're not over the target. 08:58, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Structure change 

message: The 3rd Shock Army appears in the Treyarch-published video game "Call of Duty: World At War;" during Soviet campaign levels, the player assumes the role of a fictional Private Dimitri Petrenko, who is eventually reassigned from a rifle company to the 3rd Shock, and participates in the taking of Berlin. Petrenko plants the 3rd Shock's battle standard atop the captured Reichstag building at the game's conclusion. Atypicaloracle (talk) 05:58, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  In popular culture 

message: Hi,
are there any numbers about size of the Army, casualties and maybe how many Soviets were fighting from the start until Berlin and survived?! I think the Army got "reinforced" at least 3 times after Demyansk, before Berlin and the other battles. Greetings Kilon22 (talk) 23:24, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Numbers of survivors
Talk:The Rolling Stones US Tour 1978

message: I am not sure Bill Graham promoted this entire tour, as this entry asserts, and I'm almost certain Charlie Watts used his hi-hat as described here before this tour, maybe always. Also, I am pretty sure Graham did not promote the entire '75 and '72 tours -- his name is not on my ticket for the '75 Atlanta tour stop. I believe I can research all of this  if needed -- Watts' hi hat style seems to have been there during 72 tour, that from watching a single song from the movie.  Ledegg (talk) 18:45, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Facts about the tour I question
Talk:Pilot (Veronica Mars)

message: "All the mysteries" should be changed to just those that were introduced on this episode and this season (ie, the school bus crash is season 2, who took pictures of Veronica with the gunsights drawn on is later on). 24.24.244.132 (talk) 18:19, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Mysteries
Talk:Tammy (TV series)

message: Does anyone know who the singer of the original theme song of the TV show was? In Germany a Maureen Reneé is rumored --Wittkowsky (talk) 14:56, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Theme song 

message: There is a DVD-Box with the complete Series in Germany plus title theme on extra cd.
Is this the only release worldwide?77.10.8.52 (talk) 16:06, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Germany Release
Talk:Supermac (cartoon)

message: What is a "grouse moor"? What does the term mean as used here? tahc chat 23:09, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  grouse moor
Talk:Brigadier general (United States)

message: :Any additional comments: Neovu79 (talk) 03:19, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Support Wiki:MOSCAPS states: Military ranks follow the same capitalization guidelines as titles (see above). Thus, one would write "Brigadier General John Smith", or "John Smith was a brigadier general". While general use of ranks is most commonly in front of an officer's name, in article form, and grammar, ranks are not capitalized. The U.S. Code of law also use standardized grammar specifically  which establishes regular ranks for federal uniformed officers. Neovu79 (talk) 03:19, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: Would it be fair to say a Brigadier General is always in command of a Brigade? Is often in command of...? Is typically in command of...? The article should tell us what the typical command is for this rank. It probably should do this for every rank. —MiguelMunoz (talk) 18:59, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Command of a Brigadier General
Talk:Major general (United States)

message: The information in the History subsection was moved from Major General#United States and is not the work of myself. All information is credited to the original auther(s). Neovu79 (talk) 08:22, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Information in History subsection

message: :Any additional comments: Neovu79 (talk) 03:20, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*  Support Wiki:MOSCAPS states: Military ranks follow the same capitalization guidelines as titles (see above). Thus, one would write "Brigadier General John Smith", or "John Smith was a brigadier general". While general use of ranks is most commonly in front of an officer's name, in article form, and grammar, ranks are not capitalized. The U.S. Code of law also use standardized grammar specifically  which establishes regular ranks for federal uniformed officers. Neovu79 (talk) 03:20, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: The Confederate States of America was not a recognized nation, and their armies were not a part of the United States military. The paragraph regarding the use of Major General in this article should be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.19.45.61 (talk) 00:07, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confederate States 

message: Are there policies for missing names?  Is one deleted if they have naturalized to China? 71.251.10.7 (talk) 04:45, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Name
Talk:Mars vs. Mars

message: * The title Mars vs. Mars is a reference to the film Kramer vs Kramer starring Dustin Hoffman.
This could easily be a reference to Spy vs Spy from Mad Magazine and considering the humor of the show, much more likely. In any case, no source for either.  RoyBatty42 (talk) 18:55, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed unsourced material
Talk:Trollhättan

message: The article currently says The name Trollhättan is translated as "troll's bonnet". Now, my knowledge od Swedish is very limited, but wouldn't it be more correct to say "the troll's bonnet"? --BjKa (talk) 14:13, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:The Hollow Men (book)

message: This article from the NZ Herald might be of some use. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 03:55, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article of use?
File talk:Short Wave-Live-1.jpg

message: Source: http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B0006ZINRQ.01._SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg
This image is a cover of the album Short Wave Live by the band Short Wave. Its inclusion here is claimed as fair use because:
* It illustrates the educational article Short Wave Live about the album from which the cover illustration was taken.
* The image is used as the primary means of visual identification of the article topic.
* It is a low resolution image.
* The image is only a small portion of the commercial product. 
* It is not replaceable with an uncopyrighted or freely copyrighted image of comparable educational value.
* The use of the cover will not affect the value of the original work or limit the copyright holder's rights or ability to distribute the original.  
The use of the cover illustration is in good faith, and its inclusion enhances the quality of the article without reducing the commercial value of the recording from which it was drawn. BNutzer (talk) 09:28, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Expanded fair use rationale
Talk:Sabah F.C. (Malaysia)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved as per GiantSnowman's proposal below.   — Amakuru (talk) 13:23, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Sabah Football Club → ? – The club has a new official name Sabah Football Club and a new common name Sabah F.C./FC. Since in the cat :Category:Football clubs in Malaysia a bit more club use F.C., thus better follow the naming convention. Matthew hk (talk) 03:07, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

text: The only problem is Sabah FC (Azerbaijani ) exist. Matthew hk (talk) 03:09, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

text: Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. GiantSnowman 12:28, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 24 February 2021
Talk:List of TV Nation episodes

message: There was a TV Nation segment "Savings and Loan Scandal" which didn't air in the US, but was shown to US audiences in April 2003,  at the Museum of Television and Radio exhibit “Antagonism Over the Airwaves”.
I assume this is part of Season 2, Episode 8, which aired only on BBC2.  Does anyone have more information on this?
24.57.239.43 (talk) 01:30, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This segment aired as part of S02E07 on the BBC and can be viewed on YouTube at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0DkGkNkUEZU. I have added this information into the episode synopsis as well as citing the MTR/Paley Center exhibit press release. Rock DJ (talk) 23:14, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Season 2 Episode 8, and unaired segments 
File talk:Soft Machine-Six.jpg

message: Image source: http://cover6.cduniverse.com/msiart/0000020/0000020417.jpg
This image is a cover of the album Six by the band Soft Machine. Its inclusion here is claimed as fair use because:
* It illustrates the educational article Six (Soft Machine album) about the album from which the cover illustration was taken.
* The image is used as the primary means of visual identification of the article topic.
* It is a low resolution image.
* The image is only a small portion of the commercial product. 
* It is not replaceable with an uncopyrighted or freely copyrighted image of comparable educational value.
* The use of the cover will not affect the value of the original work or limit the copyright holder's rights or ability to distribute the original.  
The use of the cover illustration is in good faith, and its inclusion enhances the quality of the article without reducing the commercial value of the recording from which it was drawn. BNutzer (talk) 09:27, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Expanded fair use rationale
Talk:Wild (company)

message: http://www.wild.de/wild/opencms/banner/WILD_intro_980x655.swf
WhisperToMe (talk) 06:20, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Stuff
File talk:Soft machine-fourth.jpg

message: Image source: http://rateyourmusic.com/album_images/840.jpg
This image is a cover of the album Fourth by the band Soft Machine. Its inclusion here is claimed as fair use because:
* It illustrates the educational article Fourth (album) about the album from which the cover illustration was taken.
* The image is used as the primary means of visual identification of the article topic.
* It is a low resolution image.
* The image is only a small portion of the commercial product. 
* It is not replaceable with an uncopyrighted or freely copyrighted image of comparable educational value.
* The use of the cover will not affect the value of the original work or limit the copyright holder's rights or ability to distribute the original.  
The use of the cover illustration is in good faith, and its inclusion enhances the quality of the article without reducing the commercial value of the recording from which it was drawn. BNutzer (talk) 09:26, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expanded fair use rationale
Talk:The Incredible Hulk (1996 TV series)

message: Some unregistered user keeps removing the fact that the show did previously aired in reruns on Disney XD up until 2012 and thinks it didn't. Clearly, the user wasn't around when it did aired on Disney XD. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 04:39, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disney XD
Talk:Airborne radio relay

message: There was WWII Airborne relay as well. The Germans were guiding their night fighters toward Allied bombers. Soon, the British would use a Mosquito with operators mimicking the German ground controllers and confusing the fighters. So the Germans switched to female operators, betting the Allies would not put women into aircraft over Axis territory. They were right, but the Mosquitos soon had airborne relay from German-fluent female operators back in the UK, cursing out the actual ones and deepening the German pilots uncertainty.
173.79.61.173 (talk) 03:24, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
Talk:Star Maidens

message: Werbung im Rundfunk GmbH was the sales vehicle for Hessischer Rundfunk, the local broadcasting company for hesse. At the time there was a regional early evening schedule on the otherwise national first network ARD where each region would get local news, advertising and light entertainment. Star maidens was undoubtedly transmitted in this timeslot to viewers in hesse, but other regions would often see different programmes or different episodes. It was not broadcast by ZDF.92.200.188.216 (talk) 18:32, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not on ZDF
File talk:PreviouslyHeldTerr RussianEmpire.PNG

message: I think the captions are rather bizarre. When did either Russian Empire or USSR "directly rule" e.g. Albania, or Bulgaria, or Yugoslavia? While one can argue that the communist governments of those countries were under Soviet control during certain time periods, this is not what one would normally mean by "direct control", methinks. Same probably goes for Mongolia or even Afghanistan. And on that deal on the cession of Xinjiang and Tibet by Qing... references please! Vmenkov (talk) 09:22, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ya, it isn't a very good map.--Cody6 (talk) 23:59, 24 January 2008 (UTC)