lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Conciliarism

message: All the links point to Conciliar movement which has no text. search "Conciliar movement *" (with the asterisk, without the quotes). Wetman 04:55, 31 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: During this time period isn't the Roman Catholic Church more appropriately referred to as the Roman Church, the Latin Church or Latin Christendom? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.253.254.62 (talk • contribs) 01:11, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is R.C. Church appropriate? 

message: Is this statement intended to express a statement of fact, or to express something that William of Ockham wrote?  As a statement of fact, it begs the question.  For Roman Catholics, the pope's binding teachings are infallible (under certain conditions) precisely because the Church is infallible.  130.164.62.160 (talk) 04:41, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Good question. I have requested a cite for that comment, or whatever it is. The pope is infallible when speaking ex cathedra. I know ofno pope who is thought by contemporary Catholics to have spoken heresy. There were a few popes who might have behaved better, but that wasn't heresy. There were anti-popes, whose actions were null as pope. So their actions may have been heretical, but "they don't count." Some of these relinquished their claim to pope. Student7 (talk) 23:45, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "While the universal Church cannot fall into heresy, it is known that the Pope has fallen into heresy in the past."
Talk:A Show of Hands

message: I've tagged these articles to merge as I see the two as adressing the same subject matter. Quite often, a live CD is released of a concert and then released as a DVD and the majority of these are listed simply as a single article, and many of these are more notable than this (I'm sorry to say). lincalinca 02:10, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 
Talk:Presto (album)

message: I thought the quote by Geddy Lee underscores the important observation that Presto represented a major change away from Power Windows and Hold Your Fire. V Schauf (talk) 06:46, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Shifting away from the synthesizers

message: What?
:The album consists of mainly songs in the vein of pop rock - what else would you classify them as? Wisdom89 20:32, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Pop Rock" 
Talk:Good Charlotte

message: The origin of the name is ...?  Was there a good (or bad) Charlotte?  MBG02 (talk) 22:02, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The band took the name Good Charlotte from the 1969 children's book Good Charlotte: Girls of the Good Day Orphanage (ISBN 978-0590408455) by Carol Beach York. General Ization Talk   22:09, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

text: Thanks. I found it at Joel_Madden#Good_Charlotte, after failing with the links in the article. But still no “why”.  MBG02 (talk) 22:26, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good Charlotte  

message: When you  belived 112.201.129.139 (talk) 03:44, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  glee club
Talk:Constant folding

message: :(added title. —Nils von Barth (nbarth) (talk) 04:19, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Constant folding

message: Shouldn't that be "-2"? RainCT (talk) 19:43, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The expression "7 - x /2" is evaluated as (7 - (x/2)), so y is zero. Second term, parens are 4; 0 times 4 is zero. Glrx (talk) 17:30, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  return y * (28 / 14 + 2); 

message: Should there be a mention of string literal concatenation (SLC) on the constant folding (CF) article or not? Concretely, proposed edit (diff):
:“A superficially similar feature is string literal concatenation, which concatenates adjacent string literals during lexical analysis, for example replacing "abc" "def" with "abcdef".”
:—Nils von Barth (nbarth) (talk) 01:56, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: To explain a bit, that is the purpose of WP, to inform our readers; it is not to make points. Martin Hogbin (talk) 09:53, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfC: Mention string literal concatenation 

message: *I don't feel strongly about this, but I tend to think we shouldn't mention it. The reason is that string literal concatenation isn't an example of an operator that could be applied to variables at runtime, but is being shortcut at compile time; it's something that is defined to work only at compile time. So it's not really constant folding, and if included would require a long explanation of why it's not really constant folding, which would end up being more confusing than helpful. —David Eppstein (talk) 03:22, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: To explain a bit, that is the purpose of WP, to inform our readers; it is not to make points. Martin Hogbin (talk) 09:53, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Threaded discussion
Talk:The Stranger

message: I reverted the reference to the masturbation technique (as others have done) as it is not notable and there is no corresponding article for the link (a redlink). I vaguely remember hearing about this usage in some movie (probably a Kevin Smith film), but without a reference, I'm guessing that it was a joke and not an actual masturbation practice. Please don't put this back unless you can point to an actual article or cite a reasonable source. -Orayzio 23:06, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Masturbation technique
Talk:Kālidāsa/Archive 1

message: Found some contradicting notes scattered around the article, such as: "Known to be an ardent worshipper of Shiva"; Then, "A devoted worshipper of the goddess Kali". While I do not suggest that it is not possible, I think a cleanup/copy-edit is in order.
Secondly, am suppressing a strong urge to flag this as a stub because I think enough information should be available in the public domain to expand this further (I will surely contribute to it when I have something substantial). --rgds. Miljoshi | <FONT style="color:#008000">talk</FONT> 06:59, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added <nowiki>{{cleanup}}</nowiki> notice 

message: The article is moved to Kālidāsa. Please direct your discussions to Talk:Kālidāsa. --<FONT style="color:#5A3696">ΜιĿ</FONT>ː<FONT style="color:#008000">talk</FONT> 16:14, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct Talkpage - [[Talk:Kālidāsa]]
Talk:James II of England

message: and no mention or even a link to the Anglo-Mughal War? there should at least be a link HammerFilmFan (talk) 09:51, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: See Talk:James II of England/Archive 1#Mughal India. DrKay (talk) 10:09, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

text: I agree, considering that the Anglo-Mughal War was the first of the major conflicts fought between the British and English in India, and that James II sent heavy ships over in support, there should be some mention of the War and the East India Company's relations with the crown in general. Jtk2023 (talk) 18:01, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  no "foreign policy" section? 

message: I don't want to muck up a pretty well-run page but there ought to be a section on things named after the guy. Inter alia, per page 239 in
* .
he was the namesake of James Island in the Galapagos Archipelago. It's officially Santiago Island now but the English name still shows up a lot and was granted by a pirate named Ambrosia. — LlywelynII 15:03, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legacy 

message: Chapter 3.4: “On 11 April 1689, the Parliament of Scotland declared James to have forfeited the throne of Scotland as well.” If this sentence refers to the same event mentioned in the introduction of the article, the declaration was issued by the Convention, not exactly Parliament. Is that correct or was there a separate declaration by Parliament as well?—Oudeístalk  05:52, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  “Scottish Parliament” 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved.  – robertsky (talk) 00:34, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: James II of England →  – He was not only the king of England. He was also the king of Scotland and Ireland. James VII and II is both more accurate than the current title and also completely unambiguous, so you can get rid of the territorial designation that only refers to one of his realms, since there was only one James VII and II. The Scottish number should go first for consistency with James VI and I. DieOuTransvaal (talk) 23:25, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 15 February 2024
Talk:Onjo of Baekje

message: For this article, citations have been added. --Mar del Este (talk) 11:16, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations 

message: Onjo is son of Jumong and Soseono or Soseono and Wu Tae? Minh28397 (talk) 14:12, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Son of Jumong?
Talk:University of Kansas

message: Confusion over total student enrollment as undergraduate and post-graduate amounts do not equal total enrollment. 
Date established or founded listed as March 21 1864 and 1865   Which is it? 72.133.224.177 (talk) 10:12, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date established and total enrollment  

message: "Kansas universities demolishing old buildings to save millions on deferred maintenance"; Dec 28, 2023; KAKE tv.  • Sbmeirow • Talk • 06:31, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  News
Talk:Dinghy racing

message: Someone needs to link this (in both directions) with yacht racing and Racing Rules of Sailing. I'll get around to it - but if anyone else wants to jump in... I have also done a new article on Portsmouth yardstick, which should be linked. Hugh2414 09:53, 31 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Added the cleanup (tone) tag, this article does not sound very ... encyclopedic, may come back to fix later Dinosaurdarrell 11:31, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: Take a minute to read the comments at Talk:Sailing#Re-write effort -- non how-to et seq. Some of us are working on re-organizing the sailing-related articles. See if you agree with our approach and give us some help. Mrees1997 19:39, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Sailing]] re-organization effort 

message: If you want to get people interested in dinghy racing (and maybe that's not the point), the photos could be a whole bunch more exciting a still along the lines of (OK it is a video)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HxN33qW-n4E
or this
http://www.i14worlds2015.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/DSC_2406-16.jpg
might give people a better idea.
OldManwoodian (talk) 05:19, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photographs
Talk:Lincoln Memorial

message: In Russian Cyrillic, "HYPT MAEK" would be "НУРТ МАЕК" ("nurt maek"); in Kyrgyz Cyrillic, "НҮРТ МАЕК" ("nürt maek"). Google Translate gives the Kyrgyz meaning of the former as "Light Conversation", but has no translation for "НҮРТ". Would the article be improved by using both the Cyrillic writings, rather than Latin script? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kanenas (talk • contribs) 14:48, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The article correctly reports what the source says.  Changing it for speculative reasons would be WP:OR. Beyond My Ken (talk) 21:59, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: If you look at the photo in the source, it's fairly apparent that the "MA" is in fact "ИΛ", and so the graffiti is "NURT ILEK", the man's name. 51.187.59.229 (talk) 18:53, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately, without a source to back it up, that's pure WP:OR. Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:33, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism
Talk:Slut

message: Please delete the first image. My daughter-in-law is featured in the image and she is not a slut. She participated in the Slut shame walk almost a decade ago. The Slut shame walk entry is distinct from the Slut entry so any images for the former should not be used in the latter. Furthermore, I noticed the Slut entry is used in Wiki Education foundation-supported course assignments. These assignments should not use material with images that have nothing to do with the text being studied. Please replace the first image with one that is relevant to the entry. Thank you very much. Vjyoti (talk) 21:13, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: We don't generally delete an image just because it features a relative of an editor who doesn't like it. The lead section, adjacent to the article, says:  Perhaps the caption could be expanded to provide more context? Martinevans123 (talk) 21:26, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

text: I've  since SlutWalk is not an exact illustration of the term "slut", and to avoid any unwanted associations with any living person(s). —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 13:37, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delete first image, please. 

message: Will you please add more context to the first image? Thank you. Vjyoti (talk) 16:43, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The caption has a link to SlutWalk, which is explained as an effort to "reclaim" the term in the text adjacent to the image. That seems like pretty good context. What additional information would you like to add? --Sangdeboeuf (talk) 22:22, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

text: Removed image; see above. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 13:38, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add context to image 

message: Slut 
noun
1.DEROGATORY
a prostitute with standards and decorum.
"That man is such a slut with his skinny little waist I would hold it on my waist, what a slutty silly man."06:37, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. 💜  melecie  talk - 08:10, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 4 August 2023 

message: "The modern sense of 'sexually promiscuous woman' dates to at least 1450.[10]"
This is in error.  The source, etymonline, indicates the sexually promiscuous woman denotation is not attested until 1966. --Gwynwas (talk) 14:31, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  suggested edit 

message: Can anyone tell me why the article title is italicized? Is it because the term is pejorative? I couldn't find it  mentioned on a brief look-through the MOS. Thanks! 00:48, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title italicized
Talk:Poodle

message: The weight chart is wrong. A toy poodle should weigh 4-6 lb for example. Please check with kennel associations.
For example:
https://www.akc.org/expert-advice/nutrition/breed-weight-chart/ 89.204.139.190 (talk) 21:18, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Lightoil (talk) 00:06, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 24 January 2023 

message: Hello.  I am going to change the weight ranges for the toy, mini and medium sizes since they are implausible.  Based on AKC standards and other sources.
Toy:  2-3 kg  (4-6 lb)   ,  Miniature:   4.5-7 kg (10-15 lb)    ,  Medium:  9-13 kg  (20-30 lb) ,   Standard:  18-32 kg (40-70 lb)
Codwiki (talk) 12:39, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: While those weights are what is listed on the AKC web site, they are also not realistic. For example, most AKC Miniature Poodles are between 13" and 15" at the withers. All of my 15 inch male show dogs have been 17 pounds off season and around 24 pounds during hunting season. HuntingPudel (talk) 01:47, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

text: Made a change request to align the weights in the last paragraph under Description::Appearance with the new ones you added in the infobox. 220.255.226.236 (talk) 16:10, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weight Range Changes 

message: According to wiktionary Caniche is likely from Latin canis or canicula. There's no mention of duck in the name. Drake in French is malard and Duck (female) is cane. 
I couldn't find any references in French to duck dog either. I propose that this translation/etymology be removed for lack of verification. 222.155.7.217 (talk) 00:09, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Caniche meaning 

message: Weight of different poodle sizes in last paragraph under Description::Apperance do no align with those stated in the infobox. 
Change them to align with those in the infobox. 220.255.226.236 (talk) 16:07, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. M.Bitton (talk) 19:54, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: He's mentioning how the weight values in the infobox aren't the same as the text. I can change the infobox to align with the text but I believe the values in the article are incorrect. toy Poodles encapsulate the smallest size and I've certainly seen some that go below 1 st. Traumnovelle (talk) 20:55, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 25 April 2024
Talk:Lipstick Traces (A Secret History of Manic Street Preachers)

message: Do people think it would be a good idea to include the details of the singles that some of the covers were b-sides too? 143.210.182.197 17:26, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding Information 
Talk:Young Zaphod Plays It Safe

message: Is this the "Jesus was a mad alien" story, with the three "coffins"? --Phil | Talk 11:36, Mar 31, 2004 (UTC)
:Sure is, only 'Jesus' is Ronald Reagan... Where did you read about the Jesus title ?
I think I just assumed, from the mention of the three mad guys and the "shining city". However I've just found this comment at  which clears up my question:
:I've got this story but mine is the extended version in The Wizards of Odd. The extra bit goes like this: "He also heard the Official from the Safety and Civil Reassurance Administration issue instructions to the effect that the  missing escape capsule contained a 'Reagan' and the planet in ZZ9 Plural Z Alpha must be made 'perfectly safe'."
I obviously read the original non-extended version and never realised there was any other. --Phil | Talk 16:12, Apr 13, 2004 (UTC)
:I wonder if that's a pun on "Reagan"/"ray gun"... - Furrykef 06:13, 3 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I had only seen the abbreviated version and had wondered for years who the character was meant to be. I, too, could only assume it was Christ, never occurred to me that it was Ronald Reagan! Thanks for solving a lifelong mystery for me, Wiki-ers. -Anon, 04:16, 15 August 2005 (UTC)

text: As far as I can tell, the bit about 'a shining city on a hill' is the only reference to Reagan in the non-extended version.  -Darsular (talk) 03:12, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

text: I don't know anything about the extended edition, but I always assumed the escaped personality was the captain that destroys the Earth at the end of Mostly Harmless, just to change a constellation for astrology purposes. Where did this Reagan nonsense come from? CGameProgrammer (talk) 03:24, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

text: It also appears in the UK edition of The Salmon of Doubt.
I've omitted the phrase "the UK edition of" until it's shown what editions do not have it. Certainly the United States edition has it, as I live there and the copy I bought at a bookstore (which is clearly a U.S. edition, as the price is given in dollars, the copy was printed in the U.S., etc.) does have the story. - Furrykef 19:29, 7 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia as an academic source

message: An academic search engine gave me the following two hits for "wikipedia" but I don't have access to the journals in question, so would appreciate it if someone who has access could look them up:
 Title: Knowledge and Truth: Answers or Questions?
 Author(s): Michael A. West
 Source: Surgical Infections      Volume: 4 Number: 4 Page: 297 -- 309
 DOI: 10.1089/109629603322761355
 Publisher: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
 Title: Spectroscopic Imaging in Art Conservation: A New Tool for Materials Investigations
 Author(s): Michael Attas ; Edward Cloutis ; Catherine Collins ; Douglas Goltz ; Claudine Majzels ; James R. Mansfield ; Henry H. Mantsch
 Source: Leonardo      Volume: 36 Number: 4 Page: 304
 DOI: 10.1162/002409403322258736
 Publisher: MIT Press
I don't have access to the Surgical Infections journal. I do have Leonardo, and the given article doesn't cite Wikipedia, but on the same page there's an article that does; I added it to our list. AxelBoldt 06:00, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The first one indeed cites wikipedia: Marcello Malpighi is in the references list. --WS 19:12, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

text: I don't think it's academic: it's a paper of a think-tank. AxelBoldt 06:00, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

text: Every Wikipedia article now has a link "cite this article" in the toolbox to the left. That gives the citation in various formats. AxelBoldt 06:00, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

text: I added them to Wikipedia:Wikipedia_in_academic_studies. AxelBoldt 02:52, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

message: I had a little discussion here Wikipedia_talk:Researching_with_Wikipedia#List_of_places_where_wikipedia_is_cited about what should be on this page.  We need to strip out any listing on this page Wikipedia:Wikipedia_as_an_academic_source that cites wikipedia as an example, and not as a source.  Mathiastck 17:12, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  I was looking for this 

message: There are several papers listed by Kewal Krishan. I have skimmed two  and I cannot quickly identify the part where Wikipedia ise used as a source. — fnielsen (talk) 12:04, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Papers by Kewal Krishan 

message: Sorry, Wikipedia, it seems the editing staff replaced all of my Wikipedia cites with more mundane paper sources. :-(  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wmmstevens (talk • contribs) 18:13, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: By "mundane" do you mean current, accurate, peer-reviewed works written by experts in your field? Sounds like a good editorial staff.134.2.245.63 (talk) 17:34, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cites Replaced 

message: To the best that I could determine from GoogleBooks (I don't have a paper copy) Saxena, Sunil K. (2011). History of Medieval India , does not list Wikipedia as a source.  However, at least on pages 85–86 Saxena used, verbatim, text from the Wikipedia article from the Firuz Shah Tughlaq.  See Talk:Firuz Shah Tughlaq#Not copyvio, not a source for more detail. Should this be listed here annotated "uncredited"? --Bejnar (talk) 19:09, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Saxena, Sunil K. (2011). ''History of Medieval India''