Talk:Information processing (psychology)

message: Abraham Moles and Frieder Nake analyzed links between aesthetics and information theory. Nake's book Ästhetik als Informationsverarbeitung (Aesthetics as information processing) is perhaps most relevant to this article. The full reference is: F Nake (1974). Ästhetik als Informationsverarbeitung. (Aesthetics as information processing). Grundlagen und Anwendungen der Informatik im Bereich ästhetischer Produktion und Kritik. Springer, 1974, ,  . Fleabox (talk) 17:52, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Aesthetics]] as [[information processing]] 

message: If this article is restricted to psychology, then it should be renamed to information processing (psychology) or cognitive information processing. Otherwise it doesn't make much sense. Further, the intro lacks proper context(s).  gives: "S: (n) information science, informatics, information processing, IP (the sciences concerned with gathering, manipulating, storing, retrieving, and classifying recorded information)". Pcap ping 19:16, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  tags 

message: Someone has already pointed out the difference between these two actions.
Information processing takes place in every exchange between all types of matter and waves.
Data and its processing involves a human or humans entering their already anthropologically interpreted data into a computer. Then letting it connect the relevant issues.
Please classify "information processing" as it applies to living and non-living interchange rather than as the specific act of the regurgitation of previously interpreted data by a computer.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.80.66.202 (talk) 05:54, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Information Processing and Data Processing 

message: This page seems to mainly be about psychological information processing, even though it includes information about Shannon's information theory in the introduction. It should be renamed "Information processing (psychology)" or "(cognitive science)", and the stuff about computational information processing should be put in an article named e.g. "Information processing (computer science)" - if computer scientists use such a term, or if not, perhaps redirected to a page about Shannon's information theory.Tigrennatenn (talk) 04:19, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation of psychology vs. computational information processing 

message: This article clearly needs some improvement.  More sources in general would be valuable as well as making sure each sources is cited within the article.  Make sure that there is no plagiarizing taking place.  CITE, CITE, CITE.  Furthermore, this article needs more depth and history added to the page.  Lastly, the article is not as clearly written as it should be in order for the average person to understand.
Brandi Carolyn Hull
9/11/12  — Preceding unsigned comment added by BrandiCarolyn (talk • contribs) 05:38, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Without the least attempt to improve the article, this comment is not helpful to anybody.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.4.79.21 (talk) 07:03, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review 

message: The opening paragraph cites (Denings and Bell, 2012) with the definition of latent and manifest information. However, the cited text (available in http://denninginstitute.com/pjd/PUBS/AmSci-2012-info.pdf) does not define these concepts, instead defining meaning as the association between signs and referents, according to a model proposed by Paolo Rocchi. 
Its view is that new information is generated when an association is created between a sign and its referent, in parallel to the act of creating an hyperlink in the Web. This strike me as counter to the premise that a single block of information has all there is to know, and processing is the act of removing confusion and writing down the in-betweens.
143.107.232.254 (talk) 15:03, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I am also unable to find any mention of latent and manifest information in the work of Claude Shannon. A Google Scholar search for "manifest information" in work written by Shannon reports nothing; if Shannon actually did distinguish between latent and manifest information, it was in work that never made it into the Scholar index. A regular Google search returns the McGonigle book (which contains only a paragraph on this distinction and does not actually cite any work by Shannon) and plagiarized copies of the Wikipedia article. I am going to remove this unless someone can point to a more reliable source that indicates that Shannon himself actually said this. 72.140.133.233 (talk) 15:39, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misused citation 

message: I'm afraid this article is a bit of a disaster, starting with the first sentence, which is nonsense.  "Cognitive Information processing is the change (processing) of information in any manner detectable by an observer."  Detectable by an observer?  Most human information processing is not detectable by an observer. Information processing IS about a change of information, but the article should give some examples of changes (moving, transforming, adding, etc.)  It also needs to identify the key components of cognitive IP theory as information stores (LTM, STM, etc.) and processes that flilter and transform both sensory input and mental information (representations).The article asserts IP "types" as being sequential and parallel (without citation), but neglects to say that historical IP models are sequential or discussing any contemporary models that are parallel . This whole issue of sequential vs parallel is appropriate, but should be addressed after more foundational information is presented. This information is not handled competently or in detail and leaves out the really relevant historical researchers for someone the article admits is not associated with IP theory. Robotczar (talk) 01:15, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: This article is hardly about information processing 

message: "[...] by an observer. As such, it is a process that describes everything that happens (changes) in the universe, from the falling of a rock (a change in position) to the printing of a text file from a digital computer system."
This doesn't take in to account the effect of an observer on the object being observed. See: Double-slit experiment
`anon  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.92.130.172 (talk) 17:25, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: I think there is a fundamental problem here

message: penis was a penis and penis loved penis so much the penis married a penis and they had big penisssprocessing.https://www.techopedia.com/definition/25605/information-processing Latest researches have proved that the computer and brain does the information processing in the same way. Computer information processing is to store, record, receive and retrieve and similarly the human brain function.<ref>http:pussy pysvkhgpgithrthinformation processing is all about how it functions and then it is compared with human brain in the article.Stadepell (talk) 11:56, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  In Computing 

message: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org.ezproxy.ltu.edu:8080/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=7273480
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org.ezproxy.ltu.edu:8080/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=7036466  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pola sumanth (talk • contribs) 23:45, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved.  – robertsky (talk) 10:05, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Information processing (psychology) →  – Move over the redirect which points here. It is not appropriate for a page "Foo (bar)" to exist and be targeted by the page at the base name "Foo". The situation has arisen here because of a move by  at 19:22, 26 December 2022‎. If there is ambiguity then that should be resolved by hatnotes or a disambiguation page, noting that the current disambiguation page Information processing (disambiguation) is deletable because it only contains 2 entries. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:24, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Psychology has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 19:11, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Cognitive science has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 19:12, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Computer science has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 19:13, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Mathematics has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 19:13, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Physics has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 19:13, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 7 January 2024