lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Bell XP-77

message: I just found another excellent image of this aircraft on Flickr Commons but do not have time to import it. http://www.flickr.com/photos/sdasmarchives/9195862996/
    Djapa Owen (talk) 23:07, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another image 

message: According to , the first XP-77 can be seen at the National Museum of the United States Air Force.  I've been to the museum several times in the last few years and have not seen this aircraft, and it's not listed on the museum's website as either on display or under restoration.  I haven't found any pictures of the XP-77 outside of testing. - ZLEA Talk\Contribs 14:57, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Surviving XP-77
Talk:Bell P-76

message: The title for this article Bell XP-76 is quite wrong; the prototypes for this aircraft were the three XP-39Es. Had the Continental engine been fitted into production aircraft the designation would have been changed to P-76 to reflect this. There was in fact no XP-76. The wing sections chosen were not laminar flow, they were a thicker, symmetrical airfoil which were quite different.Minorhistorian (talk) 13:08, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion over designations
Talk:Festes

message: Hmm, it's definitely a typo -- to last ed with de-prod. Plural's can't apply to people's names, can they? --Ricksy 05:20, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typo 

message: Can't we just delete this? It's contentless, and nothing links to it... — Jrmccall 16:06, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a redirect. Of course it's contentless. I really don't see the problem with it. We can have as many redirects as we like. -- Necrothesp 17:41, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Get Rid of It!
Talk:British Gas plc

message: I have modified the article as to remove the copyrighted text from the centrica website which was on the original British Gas page.
I think a comprehnsive article on the British Gas industry from the 19th century up to the present day is really needed including origins, pre 1949 private and municipal undtertakings. Post 1949 nationlisation and conversion to natural gas. 1949-1973 Area boards and Gas Council, 1973 - 1986 British Gas Corporation and regions. 1986 privatisation and 1997 demerger to present day ownership of gas distribution network by National Grid (86.181.195.80 (talk) 19:51, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article rewrite
Talk:Echelon Corporation

message: It looks like the company meets WP:CORP, but this article reads like a company-produced press release. —Wrathchild (talk) 13:04, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: POV

message: It does indeed look like something you would find on a company's press release pages. I vote for a re-write. Zeraliten 01:55, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-write
Talk:Cay

message: Is there any sort of geographical distinction between the use of the spellings cay and key. -- Beardo 13:05, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The "key" pronunciation was more common in the British Empire, but other than that, no. -LlywelynII (talk) 11:50, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  I have looked into the Oxford and Webster dictionary and among the multiple meanings for the noun "key" I could not find support for key being correctly written. The closest was "key" noun for a map entry. 187.167.30.133 (talk) 19:31, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Semantics of cay vs key

message: Shouldn't the rock band be under disambiguation instead of this article? - —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.106.233.74 (talk • contribs)  on 11:10, 21 December 2006
:Once someone creates an article for Cay (group), we can then include a disambiguation sentence. -- Beardo 10:28, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation

message: Is the sediment primarily the skeletal remains of plants and animals, or sand? The article is contradictory. Nurg (talk) 09:28, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  The remains of plants and animals, or sand? 

message: What are the difference between cays and shoals? -✉ Hello World! 08:55, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cay and Shoal 
Talk:Epiphanius of Constantinople

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Patriarch Ignatius of Constantinople which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 18:30, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The move request seems to have been archived without action in April 2010.  ~ RogerBurk (talk) 19:57, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: This article is essentially a copy-paste from the public domain Sinclair 1911 work. The tone is very dated. —howcheng  {chat} 02:21, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  needs to be rewritten
Talk:Curtiss SB2C Helldiver

message: How can the Fairchild version be called the SBF when F is Grummans designation code? There is even a link at the top of the article to a page about a Grumman XSBF scout bomber that was never produced. I didn't think the Navy system was so irrational as to use the same manufacturer letter for two different companies while the same aircraft are still in service.  Idumea47b (talk) 03:31, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: According to Joe Baugher (which we can not use but is one of the more reliable sites out there) the letter F was used by Grumman and Canadian Fairchild at the same time. The American Fighter by Angellucci states similar in its designation system section, the SB2 is not covered by that book. Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 11:32, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "SBF"?
Category talk:Novels based on video games

message: There are Ithink 7 diablo books that have been published, might need to be added to this section.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.173.174.126 (talk) 22:01, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diablo seris 

message: I don't understand all those unneeded subcategories... 
 Mass Effect for only 4 books? Dragon Age for 2 books?.... 
--Golden Specter (talk) 18:16, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why having so much subcategories?
Talk:Khold

message: The last paragraph of the article seems to violate NPOV, if no one objects I will delete it.  Also "critics referred to the album as ‘a fresh breath upon the black metal scene’" needs a citation. I believe my liver is diseased 06:49, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Questionable Content

message: What is ancient norwegian? Which lyrics are written in that form of language? It seems pretty standard Bokmaal to me...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.238.102.254 (talk) 12:33, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Ancient norwegian
Talk:Betaarterivirus suid 1

message: *Support - <Information on both of these articles is complimentary to each other. This will create more valuable "ONE" page than two pages with partial information. > plasmid talk ||| sign plz! 20:05, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge [[Risk of Missed PRRS PCR Detection]] into [[Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus]]
Category talk:English novels

message: Use of this category, as opposed to "British novels," is totally haphazard.  Why is Dickens in "British novels" and Trollope in "English novels".  I'd say to get rid of "English novels and just put them all in "British novels," since it's sometimes hard to determine whether an author is English or not.  john k (talk) 07:37, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
Talk:A Gentleman of Leisure

message: The focus of this page seems to be bouncing between the early, serial-only edition (Gem Collector) and the version published as a novel. I've noticed it flip from one to the other a couple of times, can we come to some agreement on how it should run? Personally, I think it looks a little odd that a page titled 'Gentleman of Leisure' should start off with 'The Gem Collector is...' - I'd also guess that the Gentleman version, as well as being the one that's in print and mostly seen these days (and in the 20s, going by the edition I have at home), is the one Wodehouse intended as a final and finished one (as far as he ever did). However, some people clearly think the Gem Collector version is pretty important too - perhaps it might make sense to spin that off as its own page? Or make any redirect links on the topic go to a special section of this one (if that's possible these days)? At least we should try to have some debate and hopefully agreement so the page stops flipping back and forth from one camp to the other. JohnnyZen (talk) 09:44, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Gem Collector/Gentleman confusion
Talk:Superman's Song

message: I rewrote the "song meaning" section, to add more from the song. I tried hard to simply explicate what the song itself says, using the actual lyrics. The part about the chorus being ironic because Superman wasn't, in fact, a "man" at all could be considered OR, but I don't think it's a stretch from the apparent meaning of the lyric. However, I have avoided any discussion of what the song actually means, in terms of any sort of political commentary or whatever because, a) it's not at all clear to me *what* this song is actually "about", and b) I don't have any sources for that anyways. Eaglizard (talk) 06:05, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Your efforts were laudable but the OR keeps sneaking back in and expanding.  I decided to just remove the whole thing because nothing, absolutely nothing, in the entire section was based on a source.  Other songs on Wikipedia don't have "Song meaning" sections, i.e., analysis, interpretation, etc., unless there are sources backing them up.  This should be no exception. ZarhanFastfire (talk) 21:59, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite 

message: In December 1992, DC comics (temporarily) killed off Superman and it became a huge media event.  MuchMusic announced the death of the character by playing this song. (Original research, or I remember watching it live all those years ago.) Nutster (talk) 09:58, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death of Superman comic arc
Talk:Androgynous (song)

message: Would this be considered an LGBT related song? For categorization purposes?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.134.71.19 (talk) 05:20, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Added it under "Category:Androgyny", but not under "Category:LGBT-related songs" (where songs "Androgyny" &  "Dude (Looks Like a Lady) are presently included). Tortillovsky (talk) 00:45, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Created "Category:Songs about androgyny". Tortillovsky (talk) 02:29, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

text: The category was removed. Rgrds, Tortillovsky (talk) 15:03, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: LGBT Related Song
Talk:Lincoln North Star High School

message: :] lol  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.16.148.66 (talk) 02:05, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Royal Indian Navy mutiny

message: century india british war information in kannada 2405:204:501B:9560:D836:2882:5B51:49 (talk) 14:30, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  20th century india british war information in kannada 

message: Why no textbook have chapters about this rebellion? Rock Stone Gold Castle (talk) 16:59, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did government India hide this event?
Talk:The Ballad of Peter Pumpkinhead

message: There are several copies of what I presume is the uncensored video on Youtube. 
For interest, at about 1:49, there's a flash shot of a crucifix with two photographs on either side and the caption "Between two criminals". Any idea who's in the photographs?
87.244.71.220 (talk) 08:39, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: The video
Category talk:Australian novels

message: I'd like to create a few new sub-catgeories of this higher level category.  Namely:
*Australian crime novels
*Australian fantasy novels
*Australian science fiction novels
Any thoughts? --Perry Middlemiss (talk) 00:50, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think I should add
*Australian horror novels
*Australian young adult novels
to this list as well.
--Perry Middlemiss (talk) 06:43, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I created the "Australian crime novels" category, only to discover 2 or 3 books that I could tag.  I've added a few more since then by working through the Ned Kelly Awards. I've a way to go yet.  We still need the sf and fantasy novel categories as well.  They will appear, I just want to get a bit further down the track on the crime stuff first. --Perry Middlemiss (talk) 00:29, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sub-categories
Talk:Ride 'Em Cowboy (1942 film)

message: I found :Image:A&cvolume1dvd.jpg and noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. Someone will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If it was obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the  tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as  or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If there are other files on this page, consider checking that they have specified their source and are tagged properly, too. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:54, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unspecified source for [[:Image:A&cvolume1dvd.jpg]]

message: :Image:A&cvolume1dvd.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 04:54, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:A&cvolume1dvd.jpg

message: Dick Foran worked for some years as a "singing cowboy", even though he was actually from New Jersey.  I have to wonder if this movie was a parody of his own career.  Any thoughts?67.45.112.95 (talk) 12:27, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was this a parody of Dick Foran's life?
Talk:A Right To Die

message: Since it doesn't seem possible to correct the title of an existing article, I've moved this content to a new article, A Right to Die. — WFinch 01:25, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: P.S. I've blanked the page, apart from a redirect. Can a more Wiki-savvy individual delete this page? Is there some more correct way to do this sort of thing? — WFinch 01:32, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

text: Thank you. I've filed that information away should I ever need it again. — WFinch 01:46, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moving content to ''A Right to Die''
Talk:Martin the Armenian

message: reverted anon undiscussed pov edit. VartanM (talk) 19:18, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

message: The categories "Persian Armenians" and "People from Isfahan" is added in the a category section. If he was from Isfahan. that would make him the first Iranian American too. and then Hajj Sayyah will be the second. Can anyone provide a source?Pouyakhani (talk) 15:53, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was he really from Isfahan??
Talk:LARC-V

message: I read somewhere that the LARC-V might have been the successor to the DUKW...  does anybody know if this is the case?  (and/or has sources for this?)  --Interiot 13:40, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

message: I believe the British Army purchased many LARC units, with their own specs, during the 70s. This is the same type operated by the Australian Army. The Connecticut manufacturer of the drive train, Consolidated Diesel Electric, went broke in the late 90s. The high turnover front CV joints are no longer available causing rapid retirement of these vehicles.220.244.88.237 (talk) 12:50, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: No idea who originally bought them, but there are certainly LARCs available on the UK surplus market. Andy Dingley (talk) 13:33, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commonwealth Use
Talk:A Song of Stone

message: From the personal review that pretends to be an article: "With her easy and practical egalitarianism, and her soldiers with names like "Psycho", "Karma" and "Deathwish", Loot, the bloodstained insurgent is often seen as the most likeable character."
Huh? Often seen by WHOM? Is there a source? I don't see her as the most likeable character by a long stretch. 
More sophomoric nonsense: "Stylistically, in its use of an unlikeable unreliable narrator, the book resembles..."
Unlikeable? Unreliable? Where do you get that from? This is an encyclopedia, not a teenage journal for you to publish your own insipid book reviews. No wonder so many find wikipedia doubtful.
There also needs to be a spoiler warning. 4.231.246.6 17:32, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it's a wiki, so the beauty of it is you can feel free to improve it yourself. We no longer use spoiler warnings. --John 17:55, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

text: "When they return, Abel almost shoots the Lieutenant and there is a violent and nihilistic ending." It's there a reason why the "violent and nihilistic ending" isn't summarised?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.65.27.236 (talk) 15:28, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Lotta subjective, unsourced nonsense in this article

message: The book is NOT written entirely in the second person- it is written from the first person perspective of Abel, with some reference to Morgan's actions, mostly when when she is in his direct view. I will change the sentence to note this. 123.200.198.152 (talk) 09:54, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: First person- second person

message: Please do not revert edits based on the assumption, that they are unsubstantiated, especially when the argument is given with the edit. I edited the second part of the article, because "there is NO criticism and NO word on literary significance in this section, and there is basically NO source, making this OR". This is according to WP guidelines and not vandalism. 95.91.126.119 (talk) 16:30, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  OR
Talk:Rio Rita (musical)

message: I don't know the syntax for a link to rio rita the film. There should be one.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.249.29.54 (talk) 05:15, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed there is:  The disambiguation link at the top of the article. -- kosboot (talk) 23:22, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Film?
Talk:Marcinkonys Ghetto

message: Is 'Uprising' an appropriate title for this article? From it's description, this doesn't even count as a scuffle, let alone an 'Uprising' or 'Insurrection' The Kinslayer 14:03, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accurate Title? 
Talk:Safia Amajan

message: The article currently gives her year of birth as 1956 but the NY Times says that she was 65.  Mind you, they also say she has an 18 year old son which would make 50 more likely than 65. --Lee Hunter 13:48, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Age?

message: is she one? i think the word "advocate" in the article is used in the sense of someone who speaks for a cause. Doldrums 14:04, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I was wondering about that myself. The information I've seen said she was a former schoolteacher. I'm going to remove the cat. --Lee Hunter 15:18, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  category lawyer added
Category talk:Women from the Ottoman Empire

message: Surely some women in the Ottoman Empire were Christians and Jews?  Should we change it to Muslim Women of the Ottoman Empire, or remove the categorization, or what? PatGallacher 14:25, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course at certain times Ottoman Empire included Greece, Hungary, Moldova. But they most probably will be listed among Greek, Hungarian or Moldovan women. Also, please try to imagine a status of a person in Otoman Empire who is twice lower rank, i.e., who is both non-Muslim and woman. If any of them had any prominence, she would be of worldide fame, and we had her in wikipedia three years ago. Mukadderat 16:04, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That doesn't answer the question.  Should this category be re-named Muslim Women of the Ottoman Empire? PatGallacher 16:26, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No. I agree that formally the hierarchy of categories is incorrect. But I don't think the category so big that requires further detalization by religion. I am removing the categorization of the category. Mukadderat 18:02, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Pallonji Mistry

message: Clearly biased/non-neutral and not fit for a biographical article about a living person.
:Cleaned up the article. Non-neutral tag could be removed. Tinpisa (talk) 10:11, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Not fit to be a Wikipedia article
Talk:Operation Chaos (novel)

message: I'm not ready to yet, but the parenthetical discussion of Operation Afreet should probably be deleted.  It is true and reasonable, in my judgment, but I've looked through a considerable amount of literature on the series now without finding an accessible discussion of it.  And this is not the place for original research.  Does anyone have a citation? Jplatt39 14:33, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Go ahead and delete.  Goldfritha 00:50, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Mobile PCI Express Module

message: Removed claim that Apple is the first manufacturer to use MXM in a desktop since Shuttle use it in their X100 and that model has been available for quite a few months.
: Please sign your posts.--Eddie 23:24, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

message: Images would sure be nice.--Eddie 23:26, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 

message: There are some rumours about mxm 2.0 Some manufactures that doesn't use mxm complains about some mechanical issues of mxm but it can be just an excuse to not use non proprietary mxm. This must be because the pci-express 2.0 is coming out but no one knowns certainly if there is going to be a mxm 2.0.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by - - - (talk • contribs) 15:42, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  MXM 2.0 

message: Could we have some clarification on this please. The format is being used in some 8800s i think. Is this aka MXM-HE?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.29.90.102 (talk) 17:44, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  MXM-IV 

message: HP Firebird with VoodooDNA Models 802 and 803 uses MXM cards  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.173.208.135 (talk) 19:20, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  HP Firebird with VoodooDNA Models 802 and 803 

message: There are lots of missing GPUs on the list, especially the recent ones from Intel 77.75.244.149 (talk) 22:42, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing GPUs 

message: There are MXM3.0 connectors with 314pins. Why aren't these listed? https://www.jae.com/en/technical/pim/detail/id=840 81.144.152.54 (talk) 08:03, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of Pins
Talk:Massimo Campigli

message: This article is partly copied from , should this be flagged as a copyvio? Michaelas10 15:01, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio? 