Talk:Ahmad ibn Rustah

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- KGV  (Talk) 05:06, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: -Okay, sorry didn't notice, I just deleted the date since that seems the weakest link. sunja 09:29, 11 Feb 2004 (UTC)

text: Total nonsense. Birka was certainly a 'viking-town' to the extent that any town could be a 'viking town'. It was a town from which many of the vikings originated. However, the term 'viking' is not the correct term to use for people living in Scandinavia during the viking age, since it was not what they called themselves. 'Viking' is a romanticist term. See the viking article. .. Anyway, to return to the topic here: I remember reading about Rustah's funeral choronicle in Alf Henriksson's book of Swedish history and it does not say it was in Birka, which it certainly would have if it were so. It seems pretty far fetched - Rustah could've witnessed viking funerals all up and down the Volga and Dnjepr during his lifetime, there was no reason for him to travel as far as scandinavia to see one. --BluePlatypus 23:28, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  Checked the Henriksson book, he was referring to ibn Fadlan's chronicle. But the point still stands, I can't find a reference saying ibn Rustah actually visted Birka. Anyone? --BluePlatypus 02:06, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: reverted text copied from http://www.iranica.com/articles/v8/v8f1/v8f1076.html
dab (ᛏ) 17:44, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: rv copyvio

message: He was Persian not Arab. Please fix. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 203.82.48.54 (talk • contribs).
:um, we had "Persian" since December 2004. what's the problem? dab (ᛏ) 16:24, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Not Arab

message: Does anyone else think that the two quotes about the Rus are contradictory? I mean, in the first, they are portrayed as stereotypical raiders and slave traders, hence, non-settled peoples (The island is described as covered in forest, yet in the second quote, Rustah says the Rus' have many towns and are very clean).
It seems more to me as if he is describing two different types of peoples, not the same Rus'.Yarilo2 19:15, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction? 

message: The passage attributed to ancient Croatia is in fact about Great Moravia. The 'sacred king' is Svatopluk, whose name means sacred king (or ruler, roughly).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.115.176.88 (talk) 07:19, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Great Moravia 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ahmad ibn Rustah. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927040857/http://www.arabcin.net/areen/areen_english/29/prespectives.htm to http://www.arabcin.net/areen/areen_english/29/prespectives.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:54, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The article says Ibn Rustah wrote that the Rus we very friendly towards foreigners and ones seeking refuge. I'd love to think my ancestorrs were nice guys, but is this actually true? Ibn Rustah was a powerful man and not anyone "seeking refuge", so would he even know? 77.241.136.32 (talk) 19:17, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attitude towards foreigners