Talk:Firing Line (TV program)

message: I think the Chomsky incident gets too much room as compared to most of the rest of the over 1500 episodes of Firing Line that went on the air.  As compared to the rudeness of the show Crossfire, FL was polite, thoughtful and balanced.  I have shortened the reference to Chomsky.  The Chomsky incident was one show.  Plesae find additional information about the other episodes of FL before adding any Chomsky details back in. -- Pinktulip 16:59, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Balance 

message: NYT did a great article on this show, but is behind a password.  Here is the info and first paragraph:
http://www.nytimes.com/books/00/07/16/specials/buckley-firing15.html
February 25, 1981
Buckley's 'Firing Line' Celebrates 15 Years
By MICHIKO KAKUTANI 
Conversation, the Spanish philosopher Jose Ortega y Gasset once remarked, is the socializing instrument par excellence. Yesterday conversation was in particularly fine form at the New York Yacht Club, where about 300 of its finest practitioners gathered to celebrate the 15th anniversary of Firing Line, William F. Buckley Jr.'s weekly colloquy, telecast by the Public Broadcasting Service.
-- Pinktulip 13:06, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Great NYT article on FL: 

message: This statement seems a little POV if you ask me, yes Crossfire was less polite, but the Hardball seems pretty wrong, well, somewhat at least,  what about O'Reilly or Hannity, they're pretty damn rude if you ask me. --Saint-Paddy 17:45, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Politeness of FL 

message: "The show might be compared in politeness and erudition to other national public interview shows, specifically Charlie Rose or Terry Gross, but Buckley was clearly interested in debate and not afraid to occasionally remind the viewer that his point of view was specifically Roman Catholic."
This statement seems to be a very subtle example of POV. It looks innocuous on the outside but look at the syntax. The sentence uses a Even-But type phrasing. Even though it might be compared in politeness and erudition......but his point of view was Roman Catholic. It makes it seem as if erudition and politeness are in direct opposition to Roman Catholicism or having a Roman Catholicism influenced worldview. I get what the sentence is trying to say but there might be a better way of phrasing it.
--Anonymous Wikipedian.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.180.201.116 (talk) 00:10, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strange Sentence 

message: I think it's important to mention in the part of the article dealing with "Firing Line's" run on SECA/SCTV from 1971-1999, it was underwritten by a grant from the John M Olin Foundation.  Without that financial support it is very unlikely the show would have remained on television, commercial or public, for that long.  The article even states that Buckley and Steibel were not able to find a commercial television station willing to syndicate it.  Very important fact that should be included.johncheverly 17:46, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  John M Olin Foundation??? 

message: From the second paragraph, "Most guests were intellectuals or those in privileged positions of power, and they were interviewed about ideas and issues of the day."  How about simply, "...or influential people of the day"?
Astrofan (talk) 04:40, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  I don't know what this is called in Wiki-language, but it's clearly biased. 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Firing Line (TV series). Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add  after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
*Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.salon.com/media/lehm/1999/01/07lehm.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:38, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Firing Line (TV series). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110628213313/http://www.salon.com/media/lehm/1999/01/07lehm.html to http://www.salon.com/media/lehm/1999/01/07lehm.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:28, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I tagged the statement This practice was probably a gesture of appreciation to public TV's normal audience of highly educated viewers (Firing Line's most ardent fans) for their patience in being ignored during said drives, in order for stations to broadcast mass-interest special programming aimed at drawing financial contributions from a larger public. as possible improper synthesis/original research. It makes sense, but is there a source for it? If so, please add a citation and feel free to remove the tag. Otherwise it looks like speculation. BlackcurrantTea (talk) 06:41, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improper synthesis tag 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Firing Line (TV series). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130509134849/http://hoohila.stanford.edu/firingline/programView2.php?programID=300 to http://hoohila.stanford.edu/firingline/programView2.php?programID=300
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:35, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello. I added photos of the hosts which I think will help people follow from one to the other. With some luck, maybe another editor will be able to complete the new Hoover section. I'll add what I can but am available only sporadically. -SusanLesch (talk) 18:35, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The Hoover show is not related to the Buckley show (as stated by a disclaimer at the end of each episode). They should probably get separate articles. Arlo James Barnes 22:33, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  New show 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:21, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion