Talk:BioArt

message: ----
It will take a few days to complete this article.  I welcome authors and editors to work with me on this article.  I am currently collecting information and will be updating this pay every few hours. Your contributions are welcome.  Natasha Vita-More 23:18, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

message: 1 Overview
 2 Exposing artists to laboratories
 3 Controversy
 4 BioArt practitioners
The current article structure is a little flat. I propose the structure following this post.  I'd also like to discuss the inclusion guidelines for having an artist named on the page. - Aaron Brenneman (talk) 13:47, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Structure 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on BioArt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081020121935/http://bioart.med.harvard.edu:80/bioart_introduction.html to http://bioart.med.harvard.edu/bioart_introduction.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060906212426/http://artsci.ucla.edu/events/hauser.html to http://artsci.ucla.edu/events/hauser.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070427220329/http://summit.planetary-collegium.net:80/ to http://summit.planetary-collegium.net/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:29, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Bioart is a hot topic and a theme that curators, researchers, writers, and students seem to be currently researching. 
This page is in desperate need of more updates and information. For those who have time to update this page, there is up to date and solid research in this book by Claudia Schnugg,  Creating artscience collaboration : bringing value to organizations. The author may be willing to provide a free copy to editors or she may be willing to contribute to this page directly, would an editor be open to reaching out to them? 
ArtistWatch MuseumSurvey (talk) 00:36, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: In the past, this article has been a magnet for promotion/self-promotion, which is problematic per WP:PROMO of the policy WP:NOT. I think it is not a great idea to solicit a writer, seems like walking a fine line towards more WP:COI. I would be cautious about adding too many individual artists, per undue weight. Rather the article should focus on the genre itself. Whether or not BioArt is a "hot topic", the article should remain neutral, and stick to what the sources say to avoid WP:OR. Netherzone (talk) 14:54, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

text: Hello! What would make these shows notable, is not the labiotech.edu link - (that is a listicle based on press releases), but if any of the BioArt-dedicated exhibitions receive reviews - significant coverage of the bioart itself - in independent reliable sources such as art magazines or academic journals. For example, Ars Electronica may be much too vast an exhibition since their shows cover the whole of digital/electronic art. But if a review of a show in a reliable source (not a blog, or announcement or press release) had significant coverage (see WP:SIGCOV) dealing specifically with bioart, that content could be added to the article along with the citation. Some of the other shows listed seem more likely. Netherzone (talk) 22:31, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: EDITS AND UPDATES ARE REQUESTED!