Talk:Lists of Columbia Pictures films

message: Ok this scorch code pops up whenever im on a sony animation or columbia pictures filmography page it needs to be deleted  Jstar367 (talk) 23:32, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scorch code again?  

message: Columbia Pictures did not released Frankenstein's Monster (1931), it was released by Universal Pictures.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.148.6.118 (talk) 23:42, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Frankenstein's Monster'' (1931) 

message: Hey can someone help me out i was kinda fixing something and it sort of failed they announced a bunch of release dates for bad boys 4 the next spider man movie and barbie Jstar367 (talk) 14:39, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Barbie release date  

message: Why are "Venom" and "The Girl in the Spider's Web" removed from the article? Cineplex (talk) 00:55, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  October 2018  

message: Per this discussion, consensus found that production companies should be explicitly identified in reliable sources.  This is to prevent original research based on primary sources, such as interpreting logos or bylines found on trailers, posters, and official websites.  We don't know what a logo means in this context – it could be almost anything: production, distribution, financing, or maybe just a contractual obligation.  It doesn't necessarily mean that they're a production company.  Absent reliable sources that have identified someone as a production company, we should not be adding these films to this list.  From what I've seen of how reliable sources catalog these films, just because Sony is making or distributing a film does not necessarily mean that Columbia is involved.  Similarly, there are many films that have the Columbia logo on them somewhere, but reliable sources do not classify them as Columbia Pictures films, instead saying that they are Sony Pictures films.  I don't know why they do this, and I don't know how they separate "Sony Pictures films" from "Columbia Pictures films".  It seems kind of random to me.  However, because this is done, I think we should follow their lead. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:14, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reliable sources, promotional material, and inclusion criteria 

message: 78.10.72.178 (talk) 16:52, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. —KuyaBriBriTalk 19:26, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 16 May 2018 

message: This page is really long, I suggest to split by decade like Paramount page is done. Picsovina (talk) 15:28, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: If there is no objection, I will do the split sometime this week. Picsovina (talk) 13:43, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split 

message: Many films are listed as "distribution only" and co-productions with some company. They can't be both. Trivialist (talk) 10:04, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Co-productions 

message: Since the list of films by this studio was broken up by decade, lists for films from the 1940s-70s and 1990s are still missing. Does anyone know what's holding things up? IceWalrus236 (talk) 23:59, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing decade lists