Talk:ISO 9

message: I don't see any discussion of the proposed merge here, so let me start it. I'm against it, as the standard stands alone as a topic, and should be described seperately from any related topic. --Mikeblas 16:02, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: See Talk:Scientific transliteration#Merge. Christoph Päper 23:49, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: What are the exact differences between ISO/R 9:1954 and :1968 and between ISO 9:1986 and :1995? Was “ISO 9:1986” just a new name for “ISO/R 9:1954”? 84.134.22.242 11:29, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor revisions 

message: ISO/R 9 - 1968 does not not mention Church Slavonic, Old Church Slavonic and Rusyn. For this reason I removed the information about these languagues from the table. --MaEr (talk) 07:24, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  ISO/R 9 - 1968 

message: Ҧ is listed twice, with different transliterations. This is probably a mistake and should be corrected. -- Prince Kassad (talk) 18:10, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This was corrected, made incorrect, and corrected again. See GOST 7.79-2000, p.9. —Coroboy (talk) 19:07, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ҧ 

message: http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=3589
--222.64.23.186 (talk) 23:30, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. —Coroboy (talk) 19:07, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  A direct url of the ref. is preferred.... 

message: Where are these letters in the table? --RokerHRO (talk) 13:17, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: These letters are not listed in the standard. See GOST 7.79-2000. —Coroboy (talk) 19:07, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ӎ and Ԙ 

message: Where is this letter in the table? --虞海 (Yú Hǎi) (talk) 08:47, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This letter is not listed in the standard. See GOST 7.79-2000. —Coroboy (talk) 19:07, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ӽ 

message: It would be helpful to have the Unicode numbers of the characters in the left-hand column, or at least to label the "Unicode" column "Unicode Replacements."  It took me 15 minutes to realize that's what they represent.  Really having the Cyrllic character codes (in the U+0400's) would make this table infinitely more useful.
Take the character Ж Zhe for example.  It's Unicode Majuscule is U+0416, Minuscule: U+0436.  In this article they are listed as 17D and 17E which are the replacements, not the originals.  
This is useful only if you are using a Unicode font does not support the Cyrillic character, but does support the replacement.  Is that common?
Otherwise, if you are using Unicode, why not use the original character?  I'm interested in this article because I'm translating to Windows-1252 (commonly confused with ISO-8859-1) where this character maps to Z-caron at 0x8E (decimal 142).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by GlenPeterson (talk • contribs) 18:25, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unicode codes? 

message: In the conversion table, please search for the row containing 0139 and 013A.
1.  Same glyph -- Л’ (not to be confused with Л) -- is being used for both upper and lower cases.  Is this intentional?
2.  I went through 60-something tables (which I got from transliteration.eki.ee) for various Cyrillic-based languages, but none of them appeared to contain the Л’ glyph.
3.  I've looked at the non-English versions of this page.  Only 4 (en, esperanto, ja, and chinese) have Л’ in them.
So, does the Л’ really belong into that table?  Am I missing something?  Any thoughts?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by StrokeOfMidnight (talk • contribs) 00:37, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: It used to read Ԉ ԉ, but I’m pretty sure that’s not found in the (current) standard either. — Christoph Päper 09:36, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should the Л’ glyph (ISO 9:1995, GOST 7.79 System A) be removed? 

message: The accents are after the letters, not above the letters. Is that what the GOST standard demands? or is it a typography error made by the creator of that wiki table? --62.224.160.232 (talk) 10:38, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: This is not an accent but an independent symbol called in the standard "the weak stress", that may be interpreted as the grave accent (ASCII 0x60). The whole point of the system B is not to use any accented letters but the standard Latin alphabet plus a modifying symbol.--Lüboslóv Yęzýkin (talk) 12:56, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accents in the GOST 7.79 System B table 

message: This article has been vandalized by User:CAPTAIN MEDUSA . The user 
* removed Sweden, Romania, Lithuania, Italy, Estonia
* removed date information for GCC/GSO
* inserted a table from another standard (GOST)
* ...
77.191.1.18 (talk) 19:20, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 2019-02-12 

message: Does anyone know what ISO 9:1995/Amd 1:2024 entails? The document is one page and I am not going to pay 18 CHF for what's probably a minor technical clarification. Bert303 (talk) 17:53, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know (yet), but hopefully it's Unicode codepoints like DIN 1460-1 added in 2021. — Christoph Päper 13:58, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amendment 1