lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Viseme

message: I think this article should explain the notation used in describing visemes, and should definitely show some illustrations of the basic shapes used.
Right now, even a simple list of what the visemes are would be a great improvement. 10-20-10.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.198.28.16 (talk) 19:21, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed! I also assume that they vary from one language to another ... 67.198.37.16 (talk) 06:47, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

text: This article currently feels like a stump to me, it definitely needs expanded with this kind of information.  There doesn't appear to be much information on the subject though, the best info I've found so far is here: http://aidreams.co.uk/forum/index.php?page=Visemes_-_for_Character_Animation#.VXEF70Ze_uM Astronut25 (talk) 02:18, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of physics journals

message: Good article but where is nuclear physics?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 148.79.162.143 (talk) 10:00, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Thought about putting these in a table with their respective impact factors?
--Loodog (talk) 18:19, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Impact factor 

message: Does this list serve a purpose that is not served by Category:Physics journals? RockMagnetist (talk) 13:11, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Here is an answer to my own question: Wikipedia:FAQ/Categorization#Are_."List_of_...."_articles_still_needed? RockMagnetist (talk) 13:16, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  List vs category 

message: There is an RfC regarding the standardization of journal lists names. Please comment at Talk:List of journals#RFC. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 01:39, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Talk:Lists of journals#RFC|RfC on journal list names]]

message: This is a cold fusion (LENR/LENT) peer reviewed physics journal. It has a rich history having provided a venue for research publication allowing for scientific review and advancement of this art to take place. --Gregory Goble (talk) 09:25, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Should this be listed in the article?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.6.130.136 (talk) 17:53, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Journal of Condensed Matter Nuclear Science 

message: Progress in Physics peer-reviewed journal should be added. For example articles on Emdrive were published both in EPL and Progress in Physics - so I do not see a reason to consider it worse than EPL.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Musashi miyamoto (talk • contribs) 15:00, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Progress in Physics]]
Talk:Real Ale Brewing Company

message: Created page.  Followed outline from the wikipedia entry for Independence Brewing Company.  Their beers Lost Gold IPA, Phoenix Double ESB, and Devil's Backbone are not listed on their official website anymore, so I am not sure if they are retired or not.  I placed them under seasonal beers. 
Thismakessand 01:46, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Luxembourg national cricket team

message: I've moved this back from "Luxembourgian" Cricket Team, since people from that country are not "Luxembourgian" in the first place. The CIA World Factbook says that they're "Luxembourgers" and adjectivally "Luxembourg", which would make this the "Luxemboug Cricket Team" (in line with the Luxembourg national football team and suchlike). The other alternative which seems viable would be "Luxembourgish", in line with the "Luxembourgish language" they speak in the Grand Duchy. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 01:44, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: 'Luxembourgian' is the adjectival form.  See WikiProject Luxembourg for the guidelines on nomenclature.  'Luxembourgish' refers solely to the language; hence 'Luxembourgish books' would mean books written in that language, whilst 'Luxembourgian books' would mean books written by Luxembourgers.  National football teams use country names (e.g. Germany national football team), so the analogy is false, and the Luxembourgian page is correctly titled in that instance. Bastin 03:20, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd ask why national football teams use country names and everything else doesn't, but I'm afraid there's an answer. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 23:47, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nationality 
Talk:Loschmidt constant

message: As far as I remember, the Loschmidt constant or number is nothing else but the Avogadro constant. It looks quite strange to call the number of atoms in a gas per cubic meter a constant, since it's only constant at a given pressure and temperature for an ideal gas. --88.68.121.16 18:53, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

message: The formula given in the article for the relationship between Avogadro's Number and Loschmidts number is:
 N(a) = n(0) p/kT
This cannot be right, the first formula has:
 n(0) = p/kT
resulting in:
 N(a) = n(0)^2
Which is obviously wrong.
I am going to make an edit now to correct this.
Spinningspark 21:41, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relationship to Avogadro's Number 

message: I need a little help with some algebra. I am unable to derive the equation for the diameter of an air molecule as per Loschmidt,  starting from the Maxwell equation for mean free path as Loschmidt was supposed to have accomplished. I know the equation to start with and I know where it is supposed to end up, but i just cannot make the mathematics air tight. Please help with more detail. Thanks.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.191.201.207 (talk) 08:42, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: There's a step missing from the version in the article. Talk:Loschmidt constant/Derivation is a more talked-through derivation. Physchim62 (talk) 13:12, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Derivation of loschmidt constant
File talk:Cfdia.PNG

message: Arkansas State is not where your map shows.  It is not in Little Rock.
This map is wrong.  I agree.  Arkansas State is in Jonesboro, in the NE corner of the state.
To expand on the comments above, the university where the athletic program is located is in the very NE tip of the state. http://www.google.com/maps?q=State+University,+AR+72467&sa=X&oi=map&ct=title ↔NMajdan•talk 21:13, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Arkansas State location

message: You may not want to add this one until later, but Western Kentucky (Bowling Green, Kentucky) is moving to the Bowl Subdivision. The school will start the transition process in July 2007, at which time it will cease to be eligible for the playoffs in the Championship Subdivision. The transition will be complete in July 2009. — Dale Arnett 02:20, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  One more addition...
Talk:Fingerless gloves

message: "Striking"? This sounds like a value judgement.
Matt Genné 01:50, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: i took out the word and removed the POV label.  Sparsefarce 16:57, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV

message: Merge This article is too short on it's own, and could easily be placed, in it's entirety, on the glove page The Hemogoblin 03:19, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Broadway: The Golden Age, by the Legends Who Were There

message: This article appears to be nothig but a commercial promo for the film. -- (Anon who didn't sign)
:I wonder that such a film can claim to be what it claims and yet (apparently) not include Ethel Merman. -- Derek Ross | Talk 05:56, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I took out a lot of the fluff and tried to stick to the core of the article without getting too deep into weasel words and ad-sprache. I hope it's better than the old version. --Agamemnon2 23:08, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Just a promo
Talk:Lyman-alpha blob

message: I've removed this sentence from the article because it does not contribute anything to the understanding of what a LAB is. If someone can explain what the "narrowband technique" is, that would be benficial, but as it stood, the sentence was out of place. Privong 14:42, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "narrowband technique" 

message: What is the difference between a Lyman-alpha emitter and a Lyman-alpha blob? Hobbema (talk) 15:10, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Difference?
Talk:Negative Syndicate

message: Seems that the page requires clean up. I suggest to rewrite the main characters profiles, there may be some irrelevant info that we could remove. Filadelfo 02:18, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean up

message: Wouldn't these lists better be setup as headers? One for the leader, seperate headers for "generals" and one final one for lackies. Floria L 22:02, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably. Will work on that.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 05:42, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Headers
Talk:Lyotropic

message: There appears to be another meaning for lyotropic as used in 'lyotropic series' and as described here  <http://www.pals.iastate.edu/agron154/Agron_154/Unit_17/terms.htm#72> for example.
The term is also used in connection with the Hofmeister series in a letter to Nature: <http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v139/n3511/abs/139284a0.html>  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.85.191.147 (talk) 22:22, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lyotropic series
Talk:Magnetic circular dichroism

message: In this section there is the statement "In the case of ferric hemoproteins, MCD is capable of determining both oxidation and spin state to a remarkably exquisite degree." Ferric implies Fe(III). Should this statement simply read: "In the case of hemoproteins...", or is the sentence supposed to mean that if the iron is Fe(III) in the proteins resting state that MCD has these capabilities? BobertWABC (talk) 22:50, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Other Fields

message: A suggestion for improving this useful schematic. I think it is helpful to show that the lock in amplifier gets its reference signal from the photoelastic modulator.
I think the extraordinary pmt, as shown in the diagram, contrary to statements in the article, can measure source intensity changes but can not measure, by itself, the effects of sample absorbance. I think the ratio of the average signal in the sample pmt to the signal in the extraordinary pmt will change as sample absorbance changes. This average signal (called Vdc in the article) must be measured separately from the lock in amplifier. It would improve the explanatory power of the diagram to show this additional signal path.
In MCD systems I am familiar with, sample absorbance effects are controlled with a single pmt, by doubly modulating the light beam by adding an optical chopper, before the monochromator if possible, and using a second lock in amplifier synchronized to the chopper to measure average changes in intensity of light passing through the sample to the same sample pmt. If the light is chopped before entering the monochromator, then it is possible to discriminate against stray light from the monochromator, which can be high in the near infrared, and which might distort the absorbance measurements otherwise.
There are various ways to use this information. One way is to vary the pmt gain to keep this average signal constant, thereby making the MCD signal amplitude independent of sample absorbance. This takes advantage of the pmt as a high dynamic range, low noise amplifier to improve the dynamic range of the instrument. If the instrument described in the diagram uses this approach, which it might, this pmt gain control signal path could be shown as well.
--AJim (talk) 21:59, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  optical schematic 

message: There should be a line or two of more basic explanation in the opening paragraph. Before launching into explanations that require a dictionary pitstop every 10-20 words. Is that too much to ask?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.228.63.179 (talk) 02:26, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Basic terms
Talk:Magnetic helicity

message: When was it discovered? Infovarius (talk) 11:46, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  History of subject 

message: Article says "It is a conserved quantity in electromagnetic fields," It is an integral over volume, so is it conserved in each/any volume or only if you integrate over the whole universe ? A simple example/calculation might help ? If it is conserved how is it created ? - Rod57 (talk) 16:27, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conserved quantity
Talk:Technical University (Tbilisi Metro)

message: Between 2011–2018 this was, via redirect, the talk page for Gotsiridze (Tbilisi Metro). This seems to have been because a naming error during article creation. Mackensen (talk) 05:03, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page history 
Talk:Barbara Bodichon

message: This is a bit confusing and I will try and clean it a bit - is this about Barbara, or Benjamin? Mgoodyear 01:56, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Project

message: — Assignment last updated by Librarygirl13 (talk) 21:41, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Women and Art
Talk:Magnetopause

message: Referring to the text:
"Since the dipole magnetic field strength varies with distance as 1/r^3  the magnetic field strength can be written as B(r)=B_0/r^3, where B_0 is the planet's magnetic moment, expressed in [T\cdot m^3].
The units of [T\cdot m^{3}] do not correspond to those for a dipole magnetic moment, which has units of [A m^2] or [N m/T]. 
Chapter 17 of http://orca.phys.uvic.ca/~tatum/elmag/em17.pdf states that the units of [T\cdot m^{3}] "... often seen for “magnetic moment” is not dimensionally correct for magnetic moment..." 
Also, the use of B(r) for magnetic field strength and use of B_0 for magnetic moment is confusing, \mathbf m should be used instead to be consistent with Wikipedia page magnetic moment.
Alternative text would be 
"Since the Magnetic dipole field strength varies with distance as 1/r^3  the magnetic field strength facing the sun (i.e., \theta =0) can be written as
 B(r)=\frac{\mu_0 \mathbf m}{4 \pi r^3}, 
where \mathbf m is the planet's magnetic moment, expressed in [A m^2]."
In the subsequent equations, replace B_0 with \frac{\mu_0 \mathbf m}{4 \pi}.
I see that this is the first talk item for this page. If I don't see a response in a week or so, I will edit as outlined above to make this correction and align this text with magnetic moment. I will also add the citation mentioned above. 
Would also like a citation for Note 1 for the 4x factor. Dmcdysan (talk) 01:24, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Magnetic moment definition in section "Estimating the standoff distance to the magnetopause"
Talk:Magnetosheath

message: "The Earth's magnetosheath typically occupies the region of space approximately 10 Earth radii on the upwind (Sun-facing) side of the planet, extending significantly farther out on the downwind side due to the pressure of the solar wind." Could this sentence be improved on? In it's current state, it seems to imply that the magnetosheath extends until 10Re above the Earth's surface but I think the intention is that it extends 10 Re beyond the subsolar magnetopause location.
Also, this paragraph discusses the location of the Earth's magnetosheath, but the provided reference is for Saturn. I only quickly skimmed this paper's introduction, but I'm not convinced that properties of Saturn's magnetosheath can be directly applied to the Earth - it would be good to have a reference here that specifically addresses the Earth's magnetosheath 128.214.138.137 (talk) 13:16, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Magnetosheath location
Talk:Majorana equation

message: It's not in natural units though is it? If it were c and h-bar wouldn't need to appear.
:Fixed. linas (talk) 00:03, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Natural Units

message: If I remember correctly, the Majorana is its own anti-particle, right? (I mean, that's what "real representation of the Lorentz group" means, under the covers, right? ...there are always subtle points, so I don't want to just wade into this).  Thus, the current experiments searching for neutrino-less double beta decay are actually looking for Majorana neutrinos, is that right?  Or are there also more complicated spinors that are their own anti-particles?  If so, what are they? Just curious. 
Anyway, article should mention that no known particles are Majorana, but that perhaps the neutrinos might be, etc. which is why the see-also section is populated with neutrino-related topics.  linas (talk) 23:55, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  its own anti-particle 

message: Things the article should cover:
* Explicit CPT operators for 2-spinor variant
* Explicit CPT operators for 4-spinor variant 
* Lagrangian
* Quantum field operators
67.198.37.16 (talk) 02:50, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  TODO List
Category talk:Northern line stations

message: This article should be renamed Northern line stations (with a lower case "l") to conform to the naming style used in other related Wikipedia articles about the London Underground.Headhitter (talk) 18:27, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: First, this is a category. Secondly, if you want to propose renaming this, please follow the instructions at WP:CFD. Simply south...... 21:29, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Boeing Vertol YUH-61

message: In the Iron Man movie of 2008, there is more than one scene showing the entrance to the arc reactor laboratory. Outside, there is a courtyard with some vehicles and an olive green helicopter near the gate. I may be mistaken, but I believe that that is the YUH-61's mockup. Am I right? If so, I believe it deserves comment here as a "popular culture" reference. SrAtoz (talk) 21:38, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have the time frame info for the appearance in the film? Or access to a screenshot? If it's not obvious that the helicopter is a YUH-61, such as having that designation painted visibly on the aircraft, we'd probably need a reliable source stating that it was a mock-up of the YUH-61. (Formerly BillCJ) - BilCat (talk) 00:20, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Iron Man cameo?
Talk:List of Bilbao metro stations

message: Hello. Currently, I'm working on some templates related to the stations of Metro Bilbao; specifically "Template:Metro Bilbao stations" and "Template:Metro Bilbao lines". They need to exist in order to add better station charts and references on the articles. I'm following the model of London Underground; Template:LUL stations and Template:LUL lines. Then, every Metro Bilbao station needs to have the same pattern of naming. Currently it is, for example, "Santutxu Station" and/or "Santutxu Station (Metro Bilbao)". As the real stations do not have the "Station" word in their original names, I'm thinking about moving the articles to the following naming-model: "Santutxu (Metro Bilbao station)". Not only is it more accurate, but also will help to standardize the names of the articles about Metro Bilbao stations and create the templates I mentioned before. Greetings.--Metroxed (talk) 13:57, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no need to include the system name in the name of the station article - just "station" is enough. The London example only uses "tube station" in the Underground system because of the need to distinguish from mainline railway stations. Most of the articles here already use a consistent "Station" as a suffix.  Sw2nd (talk) 15:40, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moves
Talk:USAT Meigs

message: Interesting problem as depth and draft two different measurements but authoritative Lloyd's uses "depth" when  the same ship described in other references specify "draft"—so there may be a problem to be resolved. Taking one ship as a quick example, the C-2 Mormachawk (1939):
*Lloyds: 27-5 "Depth"
*DANFS: 26'5" "draft"
And we know that was a Type C2 ship where that article notes:
The first C2s were 459 feet (140 m) long, 63 feet (19 m) broad, and 40 feet (12 m) deep, with a 25-foot (8 m) draft.
Maybe we need to define just what measurements Lloyd's is using there as "Depth"! (copying this to Wikiships discussion) Palmeira (talk) 16:23, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Draft/Depth changes 
Talk:List of Bucharest metro stations

message: Correct: the metro line M1 is yellow and M3 is red. In this article they are exactly the opposite.
http://www.metrorex.ro/harta_p777-1 (official Metrorex website map)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ByOnu (talk • contribs) 09:57, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong colors
Talk:List of ships of the United States Army

message: This article is titled "List of ships of the United States Army", which indicates a current perspective, but launches directly into a discussion of WW2. Can the historical information go into a relevantly named article, and restrict this one to the current active watercraft? pauli133 (talk) 19:04, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd strongly support this change. Most articles I read are written from the perspective of present-day with a section on history. That helpfully answers the question: What is this thing right now? CáliKewlKid (talk) 15:18, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing scope: current, or WW2?
Talk:Ankara Metro

message: Are all three of these separate entities, or are they all part of Ankara Metro? If the latter, does that mean that Metro refers to both the overall system as well as subway part of it? I'm confused. 66.234.222.96 (talk) 19:32, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It is confusing since the name of one of them is "Metro", but the "Ankaray" is also considered to be a Metro. The Suburban Rail is not written to be part of the Metro system. -- BIL (talk) 22:00, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ankaray, Metro and Suburban Rail 

message: There are no official plans regarding to M5 - Esenboğa Airport metro line.  https://ego.gov.tr/en/sayfa/1075/rayli-sistem  It's neither on the DHL's nor the municipality agenda. I request this act of changing the metro map according to some rumors to be considered as an act of vandalism.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Unreadedcontent (talk • contribs) 14:37, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello Unreadedcontent. The map you are talking about is removed from the article already and replaced with the accurate map that does only contains actual or constructing routes. Also M5 line is changed with another and brand new planning-state route(Kızılay - Atatürk Sitesi)https://www.ego.gov.tr/tr/haber/5888/mansur-yavastan-baskentlilere-4-metro-hatti-mujdesi --EMREOYUNMessage -  12:26, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ankara Metro Map 
Talk:Mesonic molecule

message: Can someone explain what the difference between a mesonic molecule and a tetraquark is?
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.246.23.212 (talk • contribs) 16:14, 7 November 2009‎ (UTC)
:a mesonic molecule is an object composed of mesons bound together with a residual strong force. A tetraquark is a hadron composed of four quarks bound together directly, and not as a pair of mesons. There is no implication that there're only 4 quarks in a mesonic molecule. -- 70.24.250.235 (talk) 10:45, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:List of Beovoz stations

message: This is ridiculous, because there is no "Belgrade Metro" at the time when this article was written. These are Beovoz stations as the article says. Beovoz is a commuter rail transit system, not a subway/metro system. Therefore I am changing the title of the article. There is under see also a list of metro systems around the world... we have to remove that list from the see also, because Belgrade was never on that list, as this is not heavy rapid transit subway/metro. (LAz17 (talk) 23:44, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: NOT METRO