lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Orlando Bloom

message: I was hoping for a bit of a story for why he was named Orlando.
It’s not in the 2 sources cited.
(And I can’t find it on google).
I suppose it’s a “just because”. 
MBG02 (talk) 20:12, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orlando. The name.  

message: Some editors are adding that Harry Bloom was Orlando Bloom's stepfather. A stepfather is generally defined as the husband or partner of a child's mother after a divorce or death of her husband. A step father is a legal stranger and has no parental rights and responsibilities. The article states that Harry Bloom was not Orlando Bloom's biological father. That doesn't necessarily make him his stepfather, though, as Harry was married to Orlando's mother at the time of his birth and the law makes the husband of the mother the legal father of all his wife's children while married, unless paternity contested and paternal rights and responsibility taken over by some other man. Basically a man automatically adopts all his wife's kids that she has while married to him.Nothing is stated in the article what specifically happened other than Harry was aware that Orlando wasn't his biologically son, but nothing about contesting presumed paternity. It appears he took on the legal responsibilities of being Orlando's father while he was alive and Orlando having his last name supports that. Likely he was listed as father on Orlando's birth certificate since Orlando didn't know about his biological paternity until well after he would have seen his birth certificate. Because we don't know what exactly happened, we should state no conclusions and just give the facts as referenced. Leave out unsourced determination of the legal state of Harry's relationship with Orlando. Evidence is that Harry was never legally classified as Orlando's stepfather and much more likely he was legally classified as his father while he was alive. Geraldo Perez (talk) 23:58, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orlando Bloom paternity 

message: Big A was watching an early episode of Midsummer Murders.  I was in the episode as a not-so-nice guy murdered in a barn...death by a pitchfork.  Look into it, in case you weren't aware. 24.46.246.248 (talk) 20:33, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orlando Bloom early Television role 

message: It seems Bloom was in The Shanghai Job (2017) 51.7.188.111 (talk) 23:58, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing from filmography? 

message: He made a cameo in peppa pig in 2024
I know its freaking stupid 32.212.127.69 (talk) 00:14, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have a source? DonIago (talk) 02:22, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  something dumb
Talk:Marion Davies

message: Despite her surname being French, Douras = of Gold, this genealogical study shows Miss Davies was of Irish stock, from those who immigrated in the mid-nineteenth century:
Although Davies’s father went by the surname Douras, his name was more correctly spelled Doris or Dorris. The origin of the name was Irish. Both of Bernard’s parents were Irish immigrants Daniel Doris and Catherine McCann. Born sometime between 1810-1818, they fled Ireland for America during the 1840s Potato Famine and most likely came from Ulster. Bernard was their only surviving child. 
Marion Davies’s mother was Rose Claire May Reilly and it’s no surprise that she was of Irish descent too. In fact both of Rose’s parents had Irish roots. Rose was born in New York in 1867 to Charles Reilly and Mary Frances Cushing. Although Charles was born in Connecticut in 1845 to an English-born father, also Charles Reilly, his mother, Rose Morris, came from Ireland. Charles's father may have been a stage coach owner. 
Whilst not especially Greek looking, she could have come from any part of the British Isles ( or France or Germany etc. )  =  in fact when looking this up I started with the illusion she was of Welsh extraction, with her Welsh Surname.
https://www.historyeye.ie/post/marion-davies-and-her-old-irish-roots 
Claverhouse (talk) 14:57, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mostly Irish
Talk:List of national mottos

message: I commented-out a use of the flag template here. For some reason, the template breaks. Any idea what's happening?
I also posted on Template talk:Flag. = paul2520 (talk) 16:59, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I see it has been fixed. = paul2520 (talk) 17:42, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  error when using <nowiki>{{flag}}</nowiki> template for Venice? 

message: North Macedonia has neither official, nor unofficial or traditional motto. Sloboda ili smrt is in use since  the fall of Communism in the early 1990-s when a political party named VMRO-DPMNE was created. Several off-shoot parties with the same abbreviation - IMRO were founded later. All these parties use that slogan, i.e. it is political and party-motto, but not a national motto. The motto was never used officially on a state-level ceremonies. Sloboda ili smrt or Слобода или смрт is in fact the motto of the Serbian Chetniks. Jingiby (talk) 14:07, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: No source was provided. More, 30% from the people in North Macedonia are not ethnic Macedonians. They are Albanians, Turks, Roma, etc. and they never used that party-motto. By this reason it can not be also even an unofficial North Macedonia's motto. If this is not a state's motto, but strictly an ethnic Macedonian unofficial slogan, what is also doubtful I think, please provide a reliable source for that and put it in the article about the ethnic Macedonians. Jingiby (talk) 04:59, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: PS. Neither Google Books, nor Google Scholar, or Google News support such claim. Jingiby (talk) 06:01, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Many countries have no motto, but are still included in the list. The last change to North Macedonia was with "No official motto". Stop removing it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:8388:2801:7C00:402A:325D:F2BB:4C84 (talk) 01:14, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  User:Draudak, Serbian Chetniks's slogan "Sloboda ili smrt" was never used by the IMRO. Macedonian language was standardized in 1945. The insurgents from 1903 and later wrote only in standard Bulgarian and used the Bulgarian motto Svoboda ili smart. Please stop pushing original research manipulating the historical circumstances. Thanks. Jingiby (talk) 17:24, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  North Macedonia 
Talk:Andrew Geddes Bain

message: This should be split out into its own article. Wizzy…☎ 13:32, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Thomas Charles John Bain
Talk:Eurasian jay

message: Common names of birds are not proper nouns, so should not be capitalized.  See Wikipedia:Naming_conventions_(capitalization). -- Heron
:Wikipedia:Naming_conventions_(capitalization) actually says "The capitalization on the common names of species has been hotly debated in the past and has remained unresolved. As a matter of truce both capitalized and non-capitalized (except for proper names) are acceptable, but a redirect should be created from the alternative form." Personally I prefer capitals (and the distinction is occasionally useful, as here - "jay" can be used as a generic term for all the various species of jay, "Jay" to refer specifically to the Eurasian Jay.) Dave.Dunford 10:39, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Here is a link to a nice HD video of a Eurasion Jay, anting. This behaviour is quite rare so I feel I was lucky to capture it You may wish to include it in your Wiki article on bird preening. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=314-HtWIOps Regards blutey Blutey (talk) 20:55, 31 October 2011
Blutey (talk) 03:55, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: =

message: HBW classifies Garrulus glandarius split as garrulus glandarius subspecies include brandtii, atricapilius, specific status bispecularis and leucotis, but is there any reference for bispecularis and leucotis to split?
is there a reference?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samweithe4 (talk • contribs) 02:30, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Difference 

message: The picture from below seems low quality, but I'm not sure if it needs to be deleted. It may be useful for identifying a jay.
:Concur, it's really bad. Removed. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 14:02, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  The picture from below seems low quality 

message: Some of the text seems very much UK-specific. There is a reference to the National Trust. Much of the distribution area have no oaks. Are the references to oaks specific to the UK?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.27.127.183 (talk) 09:28, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distribution and Habitat specific to UK???
Talk:List of United States immigration legislation

message: Once again this is only about U.S. Immigration law, something that is not clear from the name. Also the page History of US immigration should redirect here.
Here is an external reference to text of the Page act of 1875
http://w3.uchastings.edu/wingate/pageact.htm
:The terms "immigration" and "naturalization" aren't synonyms. The entries in the article include both. I suggest that you edit the article or edit the article title. Thanks, Wordreader (talk) 08:35, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Suggest this entry be removed:  Operation Wetback is not U.S. Immigration Legislation.
:Archivist911, you are quite right. A government action is not a law.
::The remarks in the current text are not consistent with one another. If Mexicans were banned for the first time in 1965, it
::is not clear to me how they could be illegal in 1954.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.145.71.78 (talk) 16:22, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Operation Wetback

message: The American laws of 1790, 1795 and 1798 all referred explicitly to race.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.177.249.165 (talk) 13:11, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: 1882

message: I notice there is a suggestion to merge this with this article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_immigration_laws, which I agree with. I am a new user so I don't know how to merge, but I suspect that even if I did, I wouldn't have the privileges to do so. Why hasn't this article been merged? Can someone please provide guidance? Isaac rowe1 (talk) 01:51, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why has this not been merged?
Talk:Assam

message: The  used on this page is going to be replaced with  as per the Proposal and Consensus of RFC. Any questions/suggestions? Discuss Here.
You can also contribute by replacing Infobox settlement with Infobox Indian state or territory on other pages , or by improving this one. Tojoroy20 (talk) 21:49, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Replaced Tojoroy20 (talk) 21:17, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox replacement 

message: Assamese are not the only people living here so the demonym Assamese is not exactly the correct term, this will create confusions for the people about the indigenous people living in Assam Inspi97 (talk) 13:57, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, there are many other people here other than locals. There are loads of tourists, and other state Indians. But the majority of Assam is filled with Assamese and about 95% 9f it's population.  103.147.31.187 (talk) 14:48, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Demonym 

message: On 31 December 2022 Tamulpur district was remerged with Baksa district Hxn121 (talk) 11:01, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: What exactly would you want changed. That is, which sentence? - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:09, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

text: Podumoni 2409:4073:4D39:F530:0:0:D58A:EE00 (talk) 09:18, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 14 June 2023
Talk:Hubert van Eyck

message: It represents, on numerous panels, Christ on the judgment seat, with the Virgin and St John the Baptist at His sides ... and, beneath him, the Lamb shedding His blood in the presence of angels, apostles, prophets, martyrs, knights and hermits.
There seems to be an alternative interpretation: That the enthroned figure, with a papal tiara, represents God the Father. Indeed, it is difficult to find any of the traditional attributes of Christ in the figure.
On what grounds is the figure here identified as Christ?
Sebastjan
hmmm...
:Strange, at Ghent Altarpiece the suggestion that the figure has attributes of God the father has recently attracted a cite tag (now rewritten & removed by me). I think most if not all art historians see him as Christ, partly "Christ as priest, crowning the symbol of his sacrifice on the altar below" (Lane, Barbara G,The Altar and the Altarpiece, Sacramental Themes in Early Netherlandish Painting, Harper & Row, 1984,  - pp 109 ff). There are many similar Christ as priest figures in Early Netherlandish art. 
This article really needs a massive updating. Johnbod 18:21, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I found this article to be nothing more than copy/paste from the 1911 Britannica, and it was practically unreadable. I stripped it down to the what seemed to me to be factual, documented information about Hubert. However there doesn't seem to be too much of that, unfortunately.  I also referenced two contemporary sources.  --Blueshifter (talk) 04:04, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrote article 

message: I am an art historian but my specialization isn't in Northern Renaissance. So I was startled to find an article about "Hubert"-- I know my long ago Columbia University classes dismissed the idea of him as Jan's partner. Now I read here that Wiki is recycling a 101 year old source. Other websites seem to be following Wiki. Can  a real Northern Ren expert please advise? I've heard about this happening on Wikipedia.Profhum (talk) 06:08, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: In the early days of WP (2003) the (notoriously not very good) artist Bios from the 1911 EB were copied en masse, as they were PD. The article doesn't in fact now have any EB 1911 left, & is a brief but ok summary of what is documented (an inconveniently large number of mentions for your Columbia dismissal) and what scholars can now make of it. Not entirely sure what you are complaining about.  Modern art history still doesn't know what to make of him, or attribute to him, & recent works tend to rather tiptoe round the subject. He can't easily just be "dismissed" but beyond that.... Johnbod (talk) 11:12, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm, this seems a rather lightweight complaint. "I'm not a dentist but I know what I dont like". This article was scrubbed of EB a good while ago, it doesnt seem you read it before posting, Profhum. Ceoil (talk) 17:49, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Entire chapter on him in Pacht and in Dhanens. Can and will add. Later. Truthkeeper (talk) 17:52, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the internet recycling the 1911 Britannica?
Talk:Muslims in Western Europe

message: It was my intention to put some text here too, the question is only When? -- Ruhrjung 11:42 May 1, 2003 (UTC)
Perhaps you need to put something here now! Harry Potter
I propose to move this article to Muslims in Western Europe to reflect the information given. Unless anyone wants to flesh it out.
Lapsed Pacifist 22:22, 25 November 2005 (UTC)

message: What does the title "Muslims in Western Europe" have to do with an article talking about masturbation in general? Please fix.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.12.106.45 (talk • contribs) 
:its fixed.--220.238.157.217 00:29, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unrelated title 

message: Why is Greece here? Greece is in in Eastern Europe.--220.238.157.217 00:29, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greece 

message: At the moment, the entry for Denmark claims that there 5.4M people and 270,000 muslims, for a total rate of 3%. This just doesn't add up. The rate, from the data given is 4.9%. There's a link to the US Department of State webpage with the rate, but the link gives a 2% rate. Can someone make this coherent? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.98.244.145 (talk) 02:16, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Denmark 

message: I saw no mention of Greece in the table. If the term "Western Europe" is purely geographic, then that would be right, although then the explanation of the term in the parentheses (EU 15 plus Norway and Switzerland) would be wrong, as Greece was part of the EU15. If the term is used with a meaning other than the geographic (geopolitical, practical) I would suggest that Greece would be inluded. Tsubaki Issei (talk) 21:15, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greece again 

message: The table is immediately followed by the claim: "The figures are minimum estimates...", yet the page Islam in France states in the introduction that a poll taken in 2007 estimated at 3% the proportion of Muslims in the French population. From the same page, there is mention of a 1999 study estimating at 3.7 millions the upper boundary of Muslims in France. This entry needs to be reviewed. 66.130.156.84 (talk) 21:37, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  France
Talk:Person

message: I don't have X to Y changes but I think it would be cool to include the Buddhists talking about the definition of a person in the Bhārahārasūtra which is " that man/human who has such a name, who has such an orgin, who belongs to such a lineage, who has such a livelihood, who experiences such pleasures and pain , who has such a long lifespan, who remains for such a long time, whose life has such an end" sources: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/personhood-india/#Budd https://www.academia.edu/37446866/Is_There_a_Burden_bearer_The_Sanskrit_Bhārahārasūtra_and_Its_Scholastic_Interpretations
https://buddhism.lib.ntu.edu.tw/DLMBS/en/search/search_detail.jsp?seq=540237 SangyeTenzin (talk) 17:16, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Without providing the actual edit this is just a suggestion or discussion, rather than an actual edit request. If you provide the prose you'd like to include, feel free to re-open the request. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:04, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 1 January 2023
Talk:Young and Innocent

message: Okay, here we go again: Young and Innocent is not a novel by Hemingway. This title is nothing whatsoever to do with Hemingway. It is only the title of a Hitchcock movie. This is why I asked a sysop to delete this error in the first place.  KF 14:52 May 1, 2003 (UTC)
There certainly does not appear to be any such novel.
But we don't need a deletion; this page just needs to be dedicated to the movie, as it now is.
-- Toby 07:45 May 2, 2003 (UTC)
I removed the reference to the adult film of the same title. It was in the body of the summary, which is the wrong place for it if it were to be included at all, but it was totally irrelevant to this article, so I took it out.141.224.232.207 05:56, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Novel

message: I've removed the statement that the film is currently in the Public Domain, as the US Copyright Office lists the film as having it's US rights restored (see document dated 22/Aug/1997). Davepattern 17:35, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  copyright status 

message: :Image:NovaPilbeam.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
— Save_Us_229 21:25, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:NovaPilbeam.JPG
Talk:Subhas Chandra Bose

message: Please remove 18 Aug 1945 Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose death day  from Netaji's Wikipedia page.What's the proof of Subhash Bose Death in 18 aug 1945. Malay Bhadury (talk) 09:27, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: See Death of Subhas Chandra Bose. Martin of Sheffield (talk) 09:50, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Read "Conundrum" by Anuj Dhar and Chandrachud Ghosh who debunked the myth of Bose's death in the plane crash. 223.223.155.150 (talk) 05:19, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Anuj Dhar is a conspiracy theorist. Chandrachud Ghosh also spreads misinformation. Orientls (talk) 05:48, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please remove 18 Aug 1945  Netaji's Death day 

message: "change 18 August 1945 to Not confirm yet"
As the death of him is not proved by Indian Government / Authority till today. Iamuttal (talk) 15:16, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: See Death of Subhas Chandra Bose. Martin of Sheffield (talk) 15:32, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 24 January 2024 (3) 

message: "change Subhas Chandra Bose to Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose" Iamuttal (talk) 15:20, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: "Subhas Chandra Bose" was his name, "Netaji" was an honorific.  Articles are called by the subject's name. Martin of Sheffield (talk) 15:32, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 24 January 2024 (4) 

message: It has not been confirmed yet that S.C. Bose died in an air crash in 1945. I request the respected editor, admin, moderator to scrap off the Died section altogether. REDITor811 (talk) 12:57, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the  template. M.Bitton (talk) 14:15, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 9 February 2024 

message: @https://www.britannica.com 160.238.73.104 (talk) 15:45, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  He was a first army man of india
Talk:Aeryn Sun

message: Insert customary spoiler warning here
Removed this bit:
:At the end of the third season, Crichton learned that Aeryn is pregnant. However, Peacekeeper women can keep a viable embryo in stasis for up to seven years, meaning that the father is currently unknown.
Och, wait till the end of fourth season... --Brion 21:16 May 1, 2003 (UTC)
I added the pronounciation of her name, is that okay with everyone? Noneofyourbusiness 22:28, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

message: Can someone please change that picture, there's hundreds of far better ones!!!
I'll change it as soon as I get home this evening, this is exactly why I visited the talk page, the picture is hideous, and to show it as a representation of Aeryn Sun is plain sickening! kandrey89 16:35, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture