Talk:Ahmedabad

message: ;Gallery 1
File:Mosque of Sidi Sayed Jaali.JPG|Sidi Saiyyed Mosque
File:Jama Masjid Ahmedabad heritage.jpg|Jama Masjid, Ahmedabad
File:Pole 44.jpg|Pol area of Old Ahmedabad
File:Sabarmati riverside.jpg|Sabarmati Riverfront
File:Kankaria lake.JPG|Kankaria Lake, Ahmedabad
;Gallery 2 version of 11 April 2023
File:Sidi Saiyyed Ni Jali.JPG|Sidi Saiyyed Mosque
File:Mosque of Sidi Sayed Jaali.JPG|The marble screen from the exterior of Sidi Saiyyed Mosque
File:Hathee-Singh-Jain-Temple-Ahmedabad.jpg|Hutheesing Jain Derasar main entrance
;Gallery 2 version of 12 April 2023
File:Mosque of Sidi Sayed Jaali.JPG|The marble screen from the exterior of Sidi Saiyyed Mosque
File:Hathee-Singh-Jain-Temple-Ahmedabad.jpg|Hutheesing Jain Derasar main entrance
File:Sabarmati riverfront and Atal Pedestrian Bridge 06.jpg|Atal Pedestrian Bridge
The article has two galleries. Gallery 1 and 2 use different formatting. I think it would be better if they were either merged, or (as a minimum) used the same formatting.  I prefer a merge.
There are currently two identical photographs of a window of the :Sidi Saiyyed Mosque (one in each gallery).  If we are going to have two photographs, please could they be different photographs, and in the same gallery.  I propose that the second photograph should be :File:Sidi-Saiyyed-Jaali-Ahmedabad.jpg, which shows the building, not just the screen.  The 11 April 2023 version of the article had two different windows of the Sidi Saiyyed Mosque.  I do not mind whether a gallery has one or two photographs of windows, but I think there should be a photograph of the building next to them.
There is already a photograph of the :Atal Pedestrian Bridge in the infobox. The photograph of it in the 12 April version of Gallery 2 does not show anything that is not shown in the photograph in the infobox. -- Toddy1 (talk) 07:14, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Makes sense. Did not see Atal bridge pic in the info box.  SpunkyGeek (talk)  02:34, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Galleries 

message: other than Karnavati being on the banks of Sabarmati, there is little evidence to suggest that it was at the same location as Ahmedabad. the present location provides no archaeological evidence to suggest it was once called Karnavati. ChandlerMinh (talk) 06:08, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @ChandlerMinh, it is not fringe. It is used in government also. You can check  sister city of new jersy official gov site where "karnavati" is used instead of Ahmedabad. In Ahmedabad municipal boards also have sometimes karnavati used. 103.241.226.129 (talk) 14:47, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Karnavati is [[WP:FRINGE]] 

message: An editor has repeatedly changed the number in the infobox from $110 billion to $80 billion. 14:54, 01 August 2023, 20:26, 01 August 2023, 22:41, 05 August 2023  So let us check what sources say.
*At 08:10 11 August 2022, an IP editor changed the GDP figure in the infobox from $68 billion to $80 billion. The IP editor did not change the citation, which supported $68 billion, so the IP editor introduced a verification error.
*At 10:54, 11 August 2022 , Abhijit.shah1 changed the GDP figure in the infobox back to $68 billion and also changed the citation. The new citation supported the $68 billion figure.
*At 14:54, 1 August 2023, Abhijit.shah1 changed the GDP figure in the infobox from $110 billion to $80 billion with no changes to the citations, the first of which supported $110 billion, the second of which supported $68 billion.  i.e. neither citation supported $80 billion!
*At  20:26, 1 August 2023 Abhijit.shah1 made the same change from $110 billion to $80 billion giving the edit summary 
*At 22:41, 5 August 2023 Abhijit.shah1 made the same change from $110 billion to $80 billion giving the edit summary 
The body of the article says:
:The gross domestic product of Ahmedabad was estimated at US$80 billion in 2014.
Clearly that $80 billion is not supported by either citation for it, which both say $64 billion.-- Toddy1 (talk) 12:02, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Toddy1 I think we should stick with the first source  as its the 2020 figure the other sources mention the GDP figures for 2017 or 2014 or even even earlier i think we should comply with the most recent source for the figures Joy goel (talk) 12:24, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The India Times figure was from an article dated October 2021. -- Toddy1 (talk) 12:32, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

text: The gross domestic product of Ahmedabad metro was estimated at $80 billion in 2020. 
The The Indian Express article does not mention Ahmedabad. The India Times article says $68 billion.
I have added quotations to each of the citation templates for each of the sources cited for GDP, and modified text so that figures are supported by the citations given for them. I have deleted the citation for GDP that did not mention Ahmedabad.-- Toddy1 (talk) 12:29, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  GDP figure in the infobox and the article 

message: from Notable People section i have removed some names that are fallsly claimed, they are not born in ahemdabad or worked in ahemdabad.
Ali Sher Bengali
Kishore Chauhan
Prakash K. Desai
Drashti Dhami
Mahatma Gandhi
Sanjeev Kumar
Jhaverchand Meghani
Ketan Mehta
Sudhir Mehta
Rohinton Mistry
Smita Patil
Falguni Pathak
Amrita Pritam
Naseeruddin Shah
Ravi Shankar
Hemant Shesh
Manhar Udhas Annki777 (talk) 15:51, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Don't Make falls claims, don't add misleading information