lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Brunswick Zebras Football Club

message: Players like Ross Aloisi and Melissa Barbieri have represented Australia and therefore need to have the Australian flag next to their name, not their ethnicity/heritage flag.--TinTin (talk) 01:09, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Same old flag issue

message: Club appears to be still going, and still going strong. Participating at the Senior level in Victoria State League 3 and also Dockerty Cup/FFA Cup qualifiers. Recommend remove from category of "defunct clubs"/ Matilda Maniac (talk) 17:33, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Defunct ? 

message: The page has the line "It represents the largest sporting club in the Melbourne metropolitan region."
It previously claims it has 550 playing members, which is significantly smaller than the 850 playing members of Camberwell Hockey club. And it also says it is in the top ten largest. I would suggest the line about the largest club in the Melbourne metro area be removed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.161.94.154 (talk) 22:30, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Largest club?? 

message: It is likely NOT the same club that won the NSL in 1985. This is likely a junior club that took the old name 59.102.37.28 (talk) 13:34, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not the same club 

message: Can we locate a better source that verifies a recent name change back to the former "Brunswick Zebras" name? Just the team's website alone cannot be enough. Jalen Folf (talk) 00:17, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of article
Talk:Footscray JUST

message: Tony and Lolly Vella were International playing for Malta in the early 50's before migrating to Australia in the late 50's. They played for J.U.S.T in the 50's & 60's and during this time Lolly Vella played for Australia against New Zealand in 1958. Regard Tony Vella jnr. (Lolly Vella's son) 49.185.129.29 (talk) 06:50, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  International Players who played for J.U.S.T
Talk:The Daily Mississippian

message: http://www.olemiss.edu/depts/stu_media/dm.htm
"The Daily Mississippian is the only college daily in the state of Mississippi. Published since 1937"
According to The Daily Mississippian's masthead, it has been "serving Ole Miss and Oxford since 1911." Is there a source for the 1937 date this article lists for it being established?
AllTheseWorlds 22:53, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Age

message: It's hard to see the argument for non-notability when there are entries for other equivalent student newspapers on Wikipedia. As an example, for a year and a half, there has been a stub entry for LSU's The Daily Reveille a publication with similar publication rate and circulation. Yes, The Daily Mississippian entry is a stub and needs to be rounded out to fully support notability, but it's also a relatively new entry.
AllTheseWorlds 01:46, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: I'm not sure that the incident added under the Controversy heading is really notable enough to be included in this entry, or, rather, notable enough to be the only issue raised under this heading. (I'd be more comfortable with it if it were part of a more thorough discussion of controversial issues.)
However, that's just my opinion. I reverted the addition not only for that reason, but also because the edit was sloppily made, leaving part of existing material out of context.
AllTheseWorlds 03:58, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversy
Talk:Systematic code

message: I've removed the stuff comparing typical uses of systematic vs. non-systematic, for the following reasons:
* The terms "systematic" and "non-systematic" are typically used to describe channel coding, not source coding.  Therefore, discussions of "redundancy within the original bit stream" are irrelevant.
* Any non-systematic block or convolutional code can be transformed into an equivalent systematic code, that performs identically.  Therefore, the following claims are untrue:
** "They are appropriate for noisy channels (e.g. wireless communication)."  In fact, systematic codes are almost always used in practice, as they are far easier to generate and decode.
** "Systematic codes are typically used when the probability of loss or damage is low or transmission latency is an issue." This implies that they are not generally used when the probability of loss is high.
** "Systematic codes have a lower bound on the size of the encoded output: the size of the original message." This of course applies to non-systematic codes as well.
Oli Filth 22:54, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comparison 

message: Please clarify description for non-systematic case:
if x1 x2 x3 x4 is message and p1 p2 p3 is other bits of codeword
will be some C generate encoded string, for example,  p1, x4, p2, x1, x2, p3, x3
systematic code or not-systematic ?!
"  Conversely, in a non-systematic code the output DOES NOT CONTAIN the input symbols. "
My example CONTAIN input symbols but in other, not solid, order.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.25.122.212 (talk) 18:00, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please clarify about order of message bit
Talk:Kearfott Guidance & Navigation

message: The link under "References" seems to be broken 
(this comment from a reader who tried it).
It "says" that the [main] "page was last modified 07:29, 21 April 2006."
((But when was the last time someone tried to check for a broken link?))
This comment from: Mike Schwartz 22:56, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Swimming at the 1896 Summer Olympics

message: Should Greece be allowed to get a free medal.
: That's one you'll have to take up with the International Olympic Committee.  They are essentially the ultimate source for who is and who is not an Olympic medalist. -- Jonel | Speak 01:54, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Greek Sailors

message: IOC modified data at Olympics.com after accepting the recommendation of Olympic historian Bill Mallon and transfer of information from Olympedia.org (the Olympic historians association website) to Olympics.com (the IOC website).
:*Swimming. Men's 1200m freestyle event. The IOC no longer recognized bronze medal of Efstathios Chorafas of Greece.
Jeff in CA (talk) 08:53, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revision of IOC 1896 Olympics medal table that was made in July 2021
File talk:Auckland Railway Network Diagram.png

message: The image should be updated to reflect the changes in interchange stations. Nowdays Newmarket, Otahuhu and Manurewa are all considered interchange stations. Newmarket and Otahuhu are interchange stations between the Western/Southern Lines (Newmarket) and Eastern/Southern Lines (Otahuhu). Manurewa is a interchange station linked with local bus services. James Pole 23:06, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current Interchange Stations 

message: Furthermore I suspect Panmure and Henderson will be recognised as bus-linked interchange stations as soon as bus timetables are integerated with rail timetables. Planning is underway for both these stations according to the minutes of ARTA meetings. This is for your information. James Pole 23:06, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Future Interchange Stations
Talk:Vale–West Highway

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 01:34, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Oregon Route 451 →  – This is an unsigned highway that could be better served by its highway name.  It's official name is Vale–West Highway No. 451, but the number can be removed for WP:COMMONNAME –Fredddie™ 22:10, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 4 September 2022
Talk:Oregon Route 173

message: All information on this page is taken from the two sources cited. - Dan ad nauseam 23:09, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In addition, please note that this article is designed pursuant to the relevant project.  Dan ad nauseam 00:56, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

message: Should Template:unclear still be on this article?  It was placed in January 2007 when the article looked [ like this] Jason McHuff (talk) 22:14, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This article isn't unclear, but it needs expansion. --Rschen7754 (T C) 22:32, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Is this article still unclear?
Talk:Santa Monica (disambiguation)

message: Do we need "a city in California"?  Is that implied by the section and the ", California" in the link? That is, should it just be
* Santa Monica, California
?
Jordan Brown 23:13, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Jordan Brown 05:48, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  SM, CA 

message: Looking at what links to it, and considering the relative notability of the various entries, perhaps:
* This disambig content should move to Santa Monica (disambiguation)
* Santa Monica should be a redirect to Santa Monica, California
* Santa Monica, California should include a  to generate
Jordan Brown 08:52, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. The city in California seems far more prominent in size and notability than the other uses. -Will Beback · † · 20:50, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Jordan Brown 05:47, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should [[Santa Monica]] really be a disambig page?
Talk:Oregon Route 164

message: For folks looking for why the contradicts-self tag was added in January 2015, I found the reason in a comment in the page's source:  Rocket-Fueled (talk) 10:50, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: , I decided to do some research and it is looking more like 8.9 miles is correct. The only reference link in the article that currently works is this one, which mentions the highway but does not have any information on its length. I was able to find a PDF of the ODOT straight-line map here (I archived it here in case the link goes dead), and it shows a total length of 8.90 miles in the detail. I can't find any reference online that indicates a length of 8.39 miles, so I am inclined to change it to that number (and add the reference, of course). CThomas3 (talk) 02:46, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

text: , nice work on the research!  However, my reading of the straight-line map gives 8.54 as the length.  Note the third label from the end next to the 8.54, it says "(1)END JEFFERSON HWY. 164".  Here's a snip from there to show you what I mean.  What do you think?  Rocket-Fueled (talk) 06:01, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: , I am not an expert at reading these things, so I could be convinced either way. :) I did notice that there was some strange-looking fork at the bottom of the diagram and couldn't really figure out where the highway actually ended. The biggest number was 8.90 miles, but you are absolutely right that it does have an "end" at 8.54 miles. The fact that I didn't see an 8.39 miles was my first clue that the other number was wrong, but I'm good with either of those two. I think your explanation of 8.54 is a good one. CThomas3 (talk) 06:04, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: , we are in agreement then.  I also found that bit at the bottom confusing.  Was the snip helpful for showing how I was reading it?  I'll be bold and make the changes to 8.54.  Oh, are you good with removing the contradicts-self tag?  Rocket-Fueled (talk) 06:33, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: , I am good on both counts! Thank you! CThomas3 (talk) 14:49, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradicts-self tag added in January 2015
Talk:Project 211

message: Number of institutions on the list
In the following list there are 109 universities, is that right? Savkovich Y (talk) 07:26, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Greenfield status

message: This was added to the article by 81.98.152.248:
 This is the wrong way around, at least in the UK. It is the brownfield sites that have been 
 redeveloped, greenfield sites and the green belt are as yet untouched or agricultural land. 
 There's always a massive opposition to their development due to the destruction of the environment.
I'm not sure if this is correct, but I thought it warranted moving to the Talk page. --Clay Collier 23:24, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment by anon
Talk:Rickenbacker 360

message: We need one, and I'm a n00b at pics.  JSC ltd 18:24, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I added one today.  It's my 360 6-string Mapleglo. Leepaxton (talk) 22:16, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pics 

message: I have changed some mistakes in the finish type (nitrocellulose in industrial quantities is restricted based on air quality laws) and date of production, but if anyone has hard dates and other such statistics, they are welcome to post.  67.86.151.244 (talk) 03:52, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The information I have on the Rickenbacker pictured is as follows:  Rickenbacker 360 6-String Mapleglo. Electric Semi-Hollow Body with Rick-O-Sound.  Manufactured in October of 1989 by the Rickenbacker International Corporation in Santa Ana, California.  Maple neck with dual truss rods, rosewood fingerboard inlaid with triangle pearloid markers, single-coil pickups, 3-way selector for each pickup, stereo output.  Also, I got the back of the "Rickenbacker" nameplate signed by Roger McGuinn after his performance in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania on July 29, 2001.  Leepaxton (talk) 22:16, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  General Inaccuracies 

message: I feel more should be made of the stereo output, describing and explaining how it works.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.25.188.156 (talk) 19:54, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stereo version
Talk:Tony Lucca

message: So, uh, I care enough to point out that this article is just a press release, but not enough to actually do anything about it. Have fun! --12.47.123.121 23:45, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:National Language Promotion Department

message: Maybe something should be said about Urdu being the native language of a relatively small minority of Pakistan's inhabitants... AnonMoos 07:51, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's all clearly discussed in Urdu article which indicates that it is spoken by a vast majority of the country's inhabitants.--IslesCapeTalk 18:38, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Urdu]] in [[Pakistan]] 

message: This article scores quite low on all of our measures.  Clearly an authority like this is much less important than the language itself, and outside the scope of this release, which includes only the top 1% or so of Wikipedia.  Walkerma (talk) 03:15, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Version 0.7

message: The linkage in the info box to "Perso" is not to the language, and needs to be rectified by someone knowledgeable.  75.200.115.107 (talk) 15:40, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong linkage
Talk:The Acid Queen

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: moved JaGatalk 23:06, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
NOTE: To preserve attribution before the 2007 cut-and-paste merger, the old version of this page is at /OldVersion. --JaGatalk 23:16, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: From the first section, first paragraph, is this even anywhere near grammatically correct..."performs sexuality"?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by FiggazWithAttitude (talk • contribs) 15:41, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "performs sexuality"
Talk:We're Not Gonna Take It (The Who song)

message: The article contains the sentence, "As lead singer Roger Daltrey began to sing the opening lines, the sun began to come up, as did the 500,000 concert goers." The meaning of this is unclear and I do not know what is meant so I cannot fix it, so if someone more knowledgeable would do so that would be appreciated. Newyorkbrad 16:39, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unclear sentence 
Talk:Bimodule

message: I believe the statement that "Bimod(R) =R-Mod" for a commutative ring  R  is wrong. These categories are not canonically equivalent: while any left  R -module can be made into a bimodule by taking the same action on the right, it is not true that any bimodule has the same action on left and right sides. So there is just a faithful monoidal functor R-Mod \rightarrow Bimod(R) .
Also, in this case, the monoidal structure on R-Mod  is indeed symmetric in an obvious way, but the monoidal structure on Bimod(R)  isn't! Here it might make sense to mention the fact that Bimod(R)  is not equivalent to R\otimes_{Z} R- Mod  as monoidal categories (different tensor product).
Can someone please fix these two mistakes in the article?
132.76.50.6 (talk) 08:59, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  mistakes: categories of bimodules and left modules 

message: Where it says:
> This is in fact a 2-category, in a canonical way...
I think it should say *weak* 2-category, since 1-cell composition is not strict as noted above, and noted here.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jesuslop (talk • contribs) 08:54, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Are there any plans to fix this mistake? 2003:DC:3F31:4121:4E6:7E16:B528:D086 (talk) 09:40, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weak 2-category
Talk:Dono

message: dono has roots to latin meaning "to give"
:WHAAAA? A Japanese honorific with a Latin root? You're jiving me. -Toptomcat 04:38, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot 10:31, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-11-6 Automated pywikipediabot message
Talk:BBC Sessions (The Who album)

message: Why is the "Professional Ratings" box overlapping the track lengths? Does anyone know how to fix this?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by FiggazWithAttitude (talk • contribs) 13:30, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks better now, thanks to whoever fixed that! FiggazWithAttitude (talk) 15:57, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spacing & Alignment
Talk:Raggs Kids Club Band

message: this is written like a big advertisement.
what about the pull-out from local shopping malls, leaving the kids club programs to die slow deaths?
why the computer animation changeover?  what caused it?  any why won't anybody come out and say what the RAGGS acronym stands for (Retailers And _ _ _, as I recall - I'll have to make an edit!)...
c'mon.
72.131.74.138 00:06, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with 72.131.74.138 that much of this is written like an advertisement. Some sections such as "About the television show" are word for word the same as the pdf files found at http://www.raggs.com/USA/grownups.html. Is this copy-vio or does the words "Press Releases" imply copy-left? R00m c (talk) 08:44, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The "Characters" section appears to be a copypaste from http://www.raggs.com/stations/pdf/Raggs%20Character%20Bios.pdf
The content was added by Rkcband, whose username suggests a possible connection with the subject. But even if Rkcband owned the copyright on the copypasted material, I see no evidence that they ever properly released it properly for Wikipedia's use. Anyone know of any reason why that section should not be deleted or reverted to a prior version on grounds of WP:COPYVIO? AtticusX (talk) 11:26, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Unauthorized copypaste?
Talk:Steyr LP 10

message: Cjwoodfines, I still fail to see how Benelli Kite is relevant to this article. The Benelli Kite article does not link here; neither one is linked to or from Baikal IZH-46M, etc. Of course, if we were to create all these links, it would be another matter, but I think that would be overkill, especially if (as one might hope) more of these air pistols get articles written about them in the future. (If we were to add links to all other 9mm pistols to the See also section at Beretta 92, it would get a bit silly. It only includes those models that are especially relevant to the 92.) For the reader wanting to see other models, there's already :Category:Pneumatic weapons. By the way, I must say I really enjoy that you are taking an interest in these matters; the number of people working on ISSF shooting articles here is, well, rather low. -- Jao (talk) 23:57, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  See also Benelli Kite 

message: Both this page, and the entry for 10 metre air pistol both contain the following block of text;
:To promote comfortable and accurate shooting from a standing position match air pistols must have fast lock times, shoot practically recoilless and vibration free and exhibit minimal movement and balance shifts during discharge. The pistol must also be able to be tailored by adjustable user interfaces and various accessories to individual shooters personal preferences. Combined with appropriate match pellets the pistol has to produce a consistent 10 ring performance, so a non maximal result during the initial phase can be attributed to the participant.
This text seems more applicable to the entry for the air pistol as it talks about multiple pistols and provides no specific information for this particular pistol. It seems likely that it was copy and pasted in but as it does not give any value to this article and shows up clearly as copying pasting since this page is linked to from the air pistol page it is still fresh in one's mind.
On the air pistol page this can be found under the Equipment heading first paragraph, and here as the second paragraph.
WickedShell (talk) 03:20, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplicate text with the 10 metre air pistol page
Talk:Lay Your Hands on Me

message: A new single, "Lay Your Hands On Me", was released in the UK in late 1984 and reached #13 in the UK charts.[2] However, while working on the follow up album to Into The Gap, Bailey suffered a nervous breakdown. The band's planned next single, "Roll Over", was then cancelled at the last minute. The band had already parted company with their producer Alex Sadkin, and Nile Rodgers was subsequently called in to help finish the album. Released in September 1985, Here's To Future Days reached the Top 5 in the UK and the Top 20 in the US  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.179.46.205 (talk) 18:30, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lay Your Hands On Me (Thompson Twins song)
Talk:Keep the Faith (Bon Jovi song)

message: I have proposed the creation of a WikiProject Bon Jovi here. If you would like to join or give input, please comment there. Thanks! Toa Nidhiki05 19:58, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Bon Jovi proposal