Talk:Asterisk

message: Asterisks are frequently used when writing/editing/typesetting novels to indicate a 'jump' in the narrative — a jump that isn't significant enough to merit a new chapter but nevertheless is a switch to a different perspective or point in time, one different enough that if not thus marked would otherwise 'jar' the reader from the narrative flow. In such cases this jump is marked with asterisks (usually 3 in number, centred).   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.136.106.33 (talk) 16:02, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: See Dinkus. --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 22:59, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Long-form narrative text (e.g. the Novel) typesetting 

message: I would love to know the history of this thing, if someone can find it.
Obeliscus lat. ; pl obelisci is known from Septuaginta (LXX = greek version of hebrew texts ; like Old Testament of Bible) marking the words and sentences which are not known in the hebrew text.
Asteriscus lat., pl asterisci: textcritical icon, which highlights in old manuscripts important verses.
Martin Luther responded on ECKS "Obelisci" (= Annotationes) with his >Asterisci<:
Isidore of Seville, in the Etymologies, I.xxi.2: "The askerisk is placed next to omissions, so that things which appear to be missing may be clarified through this mark, for sar is called "asterikos" in Greek, and the term "asteriscus" is derived from this."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.247.241.104 (talk) 06:39, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  history 

message: I question the accuracy of this: "Typographers call it a splat (This may derive from the "squashed-bug" appearance of the asterisk on many early line printers)."  This slang name is an old one in the computer world but typographers use terminology which is far older. Nor would they care what line printer output looks like.  What is the evidence that "splat" is used by typographers? --Zero 10:17, 16 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  splat 

message: I'm considering a write-up on the Asterisk Open Source PBX (as externally-linked at the bottom).  I'm pondering the best way to name the article... I was considering Asterisk (PBX), with a link from the top of this article.  A disambig page may even be justifiable.  What do folks think?  --Rtucker 23:40, 30 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: How about just Asterisk PBX? I don't think a disambig page would be necessary.  — Gwalla | Talk 01:50, 31 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Ooh.  Obvious, clean, and not something I'd thought of.  Thanks!  :-)  --Rtucker 02:34, 31 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Asterisk, the Open Source PBX 

message: Is the box with punctuation in it best placed to the side of the disambig line? My feelings are that the disambig line is not part of the article, and should clearly be above it and not part of it. It's not that big a deal, frankly, I just don't think the move in this (and similar pages) is beneficial. Fourohfour 00:51, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Punctuation box 

message: I saw a comercial this afternoon in i newspaper. I said that many broadbands comes with an asterik (but not this one...). What did they mean? - Gasten
They mean there are commercials in which a phrase is followed by an asterisk, and at the side of the page there's a foot note written in very small letters that says things that are not said in the commercial itself. For instance, the article states "This costs only ten dollars*" And then, at the foot note, it says it actually only costs ten dollars if you also buy another product that costs 100 dollars.A.Z. 21:57, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questions 

message: I've read asterisks but I would prefer it be asterisk.  I did a paper last year where I must have found that the plural was asterisk, because I included it then, but I can't find that information now.
Does anybody know if asterisk can be used as the plural of asterisk?
Also, another use of the asterisk on the internet is to let someone know that a field is optional -
eg. email address*
*Regardless of what you personally would prefer the plural form be, a quick look in any dictionary will show you that the plural is standard, i.e. "asterisks". Checking a few dictionaries online confirmed this as none of them mentioned that there was any non-standard plural. norm77 01:27, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's wrong. Asterix is a character. And a common misspelling. - Gargomon251 (talk) 07:06, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  And the plural of asterisk is...? 

message: On the page it says:
many Arabs would not buy typewriters with a six-armed symbol, which they identified with the Star of David on the Israeli flag. and hence the Arabic five-pointed star was created.
When I carefully count the points on the one depicted as 'arabic star' I see six ends? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tcmb (talk • contribs) .
: I suspect someone has assumed that the symbol they used for "Arabic star" would appear as described in any typefaces likely to be used when viewing the page. This does not appear to be the case. It would be a better idea to use a PNG graphic, which is guaranteed to appear the same in all browsers. Fourohfour 18:04, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  five or six ends? 

message: I do believe there is only one "s" in asterick. Random the Scrambled 12:40, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  ... 

message: At some point, the following information needs to be included (eg. unicode small/heavy asterisk):
Unicode Name 	Code Value
ASTERISK 	U+002A *
ARABIC FIVE POINTED STAR 	U+066D ٭
ASTERISK OPERATOR 	U+2217 ∗
HEAVY ASTERISK 	U+2731 ✱
SMALL ASTERISK 	U+FE61 ﹡
FULL WIDTH ASTERISK 	U+FF0A ＊
--СђrΐsτσρhΞr ScЋδlτξη 19:14, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other Unicode Representations 

message: The explanation in the article sounds like nothing more than an urban legend. I've tried to find a source to support it, but I've come up empty so far. If anyone has a source, please edit it into the article. Otherwise, I'll remove it in a few days. Arabic star also contains the same explanation, so I'm posting this on the talk page there as well. f(x)=ax2+bx+c 00:56, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  urban legends? 

message: I've found a possible reference for the "z-bar" notation being preferred over "z-star" here , but I'm not sure how to add it as a citation. It's not a perfect reference, and a better one could probably be found, but it makes the point. Icthyos 14:43, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Complex conjugate notation reference 

message: In this journal from 1791, there's an asterisk-like mark used about a quarter of the way through this page to point to a note at the top of the page. It looks rather like the Japanese symbol mentioned on this page, but that would be impossible, right? 203.17.70.161 05:05, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this an asterisk? 

message: In a similar article in Russian you will find an invitation to participate in the contest for the most original example of the use of the mark.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Пасынок (talk • contribs) 10:07, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pay attention 

message: The asterisk was a symbol of Mark Goodson/Goodson-Todman Productions, the prolific creators of American television game shows. Several can still be seen to this day on The Price is Right. 
I thought that would be a good fact to enter, but there seems to be no category for it. Suggestions? Othernash (talk) 04:57, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mark Goodson Productions 

message: I've heard astericized (not sure of spelling) before, as well as asterixed. Both to be used to describe something/things that have asterixes attached. but, how do you spell the former? (119.135.144.98 (talk) 04:35, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Action of using an asterix 

message: I've been using computers since the late 80s and I have NEVER ONCE seen anyone use asterisks as a sign of applause. Unless anyone can prove this isn't just made up by one person, I'm removing it. - Gargomon251 (talk) 07:05, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Applause?! 

message: Often, people use asterisks to represent them actually performing an action, for example, *cries*. Worth noting? 124.149.119.137 (talk) 07:39, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Using asterisks to show action 

message: There is no information here about the use of the asterisk on the Internet.  It is very commonly used in IM, IRC, and chat rooms to correct spelling (since you can't go back once the message is sent).  It may be used before or after the misspelled werd.
  *word
Also, it can be used as an action, as the person above me metioned.  I've noticed this on IM and forums, and everywhere, really. Can anyone find any information on this?--Sje46 (talk) 15:41, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misspellings and actions

message: Aren't asterisks sometimes used after a word or a statement with another asterisk at the bottom of the text followed by an explanation?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.82.140.23 (talk) 01:37, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disclaimers/fine prints? 

message: The section about Barry Bonds looks like a beginning trivia collection. Could that be moved to his own page, if any?
--91.152.65.95 (talk) 17:34, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Barry Bonds 

message: Hi. Does anyone know when "*" looks like a superscript, as in C* algebra, and when not? Many fonts render "*" like a superscript, but not all.
Since super-ness seems to be customary, there must be reasons. If so, it's better to mention it, too. --Teika kazura (talk) 23:13, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  (When) does it look like a superscript? 

message: Since when is there a standard for this? I've never encountered one, and common use of the asterisk to denote corrections doesn't indicate that this rule is followed, even if it exists. Does anyone have a source for this, or should it simply be removed as to avoid unnecessary confusion? Apples grow on pines (talk) 15:52, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  *(correction) vs (correction)* 

message: I believe the kappa has been left out of the transliteration from the Greek.
The beginning of the article reads:
from Greek: ἀστερίσκος, asterisos, "little star")
but probably should be: asteriskos
Would someone with a better command of the Greek language confirm
the correct form?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.79.89.43 (talk) 21:24, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transliteration from the Greek 

message: "Not to be confused with Asterix."
Except that we do that ourselves, in the first sentence: "An asterix"
We should be consistent on the spelling. If that means a disambiguation page with the character from the comic and moving this page to Asterix (glyph), so be it.
The first mention of the word should be the same as the one in the title or it looks ridiculous.
-- Philipwhiuk (talk) 16:35, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Asterisk or Asterix 

message: A few things: I semi'd the page in response to an AIV report. I do not think the content about the Patriots is really relevant to an article about punctuation. I also sort of feel the same about Barry Bonds, but the connection there seems to be stronger. At any rate, it seems very odd to me to have the "Competitive sports and games" section towards the top. I don't think we should alphabetize arbitrary topics like this, as in this case it may add undue weight to this less pertinent subject matter about professional sports. Just wanted to share my thoughts. To be clear I have no strong opinions or involvement with this article, I just semi'd it to put a halt to the edit warring. Best — MusikAnimal talk 20:54, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Punctuation and sports 

message: "In colloquial usage, an asterisk attached to a sporting record indicates that it is somehow tainted. The reason is that results that have are considered dubious or even set aside are recorded thus in record books with an asterisk that refers to a footnote which explains the reason for concern. " - this needs more clarity, as it has unclear wording. Qwerfjkl talk 13:29, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to rewrite it! No doubt it is described in more detail (on the "don't be an asterisk" site?) that you can cite in support. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 16:38, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarity 

message: Should this be added to the related section? "Heavy asterisk(✱)" Qwerfjkl talk 13:32, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I have created a redirect article at Heavy asterisk, which redirects to the Encodings section of this article. Did you have in mind something more? --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 16:40, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Related to asterisk 

message: It turns out that using an asterisk symbol as a correction of mistake is not limited to text messaging. For example, relatively recently, video bloggers began to often add text with an asterisk during video editing if they said the wrong word. This is much easier than re-recording a video segment. Is it worth it to supplement one of the sections of this article? WWBM (talk) 14:36, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: If you can find a reliable, secondary source discussing this use it might warrant a sentence to show this "corrected version" use isn't limited to text messaging/chatrooms. I'm definitely familiar with the sense you're talking about, but it might be too new for there to be good sourcing talking about it. Umimmak (talk) 17:36, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Using a text with an asterisk as a correction of mistake 

message: The sextile character (https://unicode-table.com/en/26B9/ and Astrological Aspect Sextile) is referenced in the Telephony section of this page. Should we also add it to the list of Unicode asterisk characters? Ryojin314159 (talk) 17:47, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Well it isn't called an asterisk anywhere and the telephony section says (without evidence) that it is an uncommon alternative name for the star key. The simpler solution is to delete it from there as WP:OR. Which I will do now. --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 10:19, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should the sextile be added as another form of asterisk? 

message: The redirect A✳️ has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Hey man im josh (talk) 12:57, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:A✳️]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]