Template talk:Navbar-header

message: * When using the code:  in order to specify a font colour, it seems that the " v . t . e " text remains black.  Is there a way to specify a font colour which applies to both the header text and the " v . t . e " text?  --MLD 12:59, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes I am also frustrated by this.  It appears that the "fontcolor" option does not even work.  What's more is that it definately doesn't work for links, but it needs to override the link color.  Is anyone around to address this? --MattWatt 02:50, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This issue still appears to be present. Does anyone know what code needs to be added to the template to fix it? – TMF 01:12, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Should be fixed now.  — Edokter • Talk •  02:27, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks good, thanks. – TMF 04:21, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questions 

message: It seems this latest change breaks transclusion in NavigationBox template.
See: Template:Emir_Kusturica_Films for an example of how I'm using this template.   Perhaps I should fork this version to a new template if these changes are required? // Laughing Man 19:06, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  transclusion in NavigationBox 

message: Could someone show me a broken page using the new version at ? ed g2s • talk 09:28, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems this one doesn't break NavigationBox template anymore, I can't speak for other templates though of course...  User:Laughing_Man/sandbox/Tnavbar-header uses Tnavbar-header2 and it seems fine. // Laughing Man 11:57, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Tnavbar-header2 seems good. My only concern is that for most browsers there's no line breaks introduced and that the header occupies 100% of the width of a heading cell (which is what  accomplishes. (→Netscott) 15:06, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What do you mean? The div is also 100% width by default. ed g2s • talk 15:28, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Testing 

message: Please reset to the old height.  Just about everything on wikipedia has been formatted to fit in with the original height being used.  If needed this can be adjusted with additional formatting on the other users template. Niall123 20:05, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Niall123, we did some testing with User:Ed g2s's CSS changes (moving from  to straight  code) and there seemed to be no problems. Can you give us a specific example of a template that had been negatively impacted as a result of those changes? Thanks. (→Netscott) 20:38, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Height of box 

message: Do we really need direct link to history? 
view / edit / talk seems to be more than enough already in my opinion. // Laughing Man 01:24, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I tend to agree but not strongly. User:Instantnood added it. Do you think the extra 'h' in v·d·e·h has a negative impact? I'm not so sure... the extra 'h' seems benign to me.  (→Netscott) 01:35, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not necessarily that much of a negative impact, it just makes it a bit more confusing than it already is, and a little more difficult to click on the exact link.  Maybe just v·d is enough -- although if we did go this route we should probably change the d to a t it to avoid any other connotations ;)   // Laughing Man 01:47, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Let's just sit tight for a day or two and see if there are any complaints.... I don't think it makes it that confusing... a simple hovering of the mouse cursor above each link explains what it does. (→Netscott) 02:06, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Please revert and remove history.  There is no need for it and its fucking up the hiehgt of certain templates aswell. Niall123 12:38, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree with above. There’s no need that I can see for a direct link to history. I also think it’s looks a bit messy with the extra letter. Kanaye 15:30, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  history? 

message: Wouldn't it look cool to replace the v e t links with small pictograms? They would be easy to create and and probably they would make those links more intuitive (images are easier to understand than one-character links I think), apart from the box probably looking better. CompuChip 10:11, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is technically possible but unfortunately it is not very practical. See Template:Islam where one can click on the image of the Mosque and be taken to the Islam article. The problem lies in the fact that this code is fairly extreme and only the very latest browsers tend to support it correctly. Other than the Template:Islam technique I'm not aware of how one could make images clickable. (→Netscott) 20:01, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Doesn't the  template do just that? It does seem to have some problems with accessibility though. --CompuChip 10:54, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Text / graphics 

message: How can we position the "v-d-e" tool to the far left??? --WIKISCRIPPS 07 TUE DEC 26 2006 9:57 PM EST
:You can use  and position the v•d•e links where you want.  07:20, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhapse we could make something like  and , for navboxes using  and  repsectively?  I know we've relatively recently changed the behavior of  recently; I'm unsure how the change was handle with navigation boxes. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dispenser (talk • contribs) 20:03, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need help (Immediate Response Requested) 

message: Just wondering why there isn't a version of this template without the Mini style.  Personally I prefer the look of |plain=1|mini=0|.  Is there any way we can make this an option? --MattWatt 02:14, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see my not so recent edits of .  The changes seem to be in working order and compatible with the goals of this template.  I would like to request that the changes I have made there be included in this template.  --MattWatt 21:46, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please put the editprotected tag just beside your request.  It would be much easier for an admin to make this change if you write the code in a sandbox and test it, then let us know so we can do the edit by cutting and pasting the entire source code.  CMummert · talk 23:46, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, thanks for the tip. I wasn't sure where it needed to be placed.  What I have done is tested the code over on , which from my understand has the sole purpose of testing changes for this template.  Perhaps I am not understanding something.  I believe my edit is the most recent one on that template. I wrote my code with the idea of just doing a cut and paste in mind and I believe that is all that would be required. I am seeking opinions on whether you all feel my changes are beneficial, and if so, if they could be included in this template. --MattWatt 05:46, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Done. Note that it may take a while for this to be changed on existing uses of the template. --ais523 11:14, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you very much! --MattWatt 18:47, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  no mini? 

message: Why is this aligned to the right at all? if the default navbox format has hide-right, VDE-left, shouldn't this template maintain that uniformity by putting VDE on the left, even if the hide isn't there? TheHYPO 04:19, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Alignment question

message:  → 
16@r (talk) 00:06, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: . עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 06:17, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Documentation 

message: - see #Adding_spans, below.
Please see this edit, which broke because I tried to pass an HTML span to . Any suggestions on how to achieve what I was trying to do would be appreciated, please. Andy Mabbett | Talk to Andy Mabbett 15:25, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I thought I had make this clearer, just use . — Dispenser 17:50, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you, but I'm not sure how that relates to what I was trying to do in the cited edit, what do you mean by "HTML title"? Andy Mabbett | Talk to Andy Mabbett 18:01, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Changed example to better illustrate.  You need name the parameters if you want the content to contain an = sign.  — Dispenser 19:55, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you, but that's still not right. Andy Mabbett | Talk to Andy Mabbett 10:11, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Passing HTML 

message: See for example
It occurs whenever the title is larger than the rest of the template.Headbomb {ταλκκοντριβς – WP Physics} 10:15, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No it happens when the rest of the table is less wide than the title used by Tnavbar-header. Your best bet is to use tnavbar separately, Though the better idea might be not to use a navbar at all in cases like this (does it really need editing that much, when there is no content apparently ?). --TheDJ (talk • contribs) 10:07, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

text: Thanks for the correction. As for the no-content its an extreme example, but it illustrates what happens in cases such as Template:Flavour quantum numbers.Headbomb {ταλκκοντριβς – WP Physics} 10:40, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  vde thing being screwed up on small edit boxed 

message: This edit broke the template. How can it be made to work? Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 21:25, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: That's done the job; thank you. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 08:53, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding spans 

message: hi, this template is really needed? there is not any program for merge/tranclude it? --ebraminiotalk 23:39, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  needed?