Talk:Low Tatras

message: I am extremely concerned by any edit war that involves the deletion of reliable sources.  Please work this out at talk, thanks. --Elonka 19:40, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The current misuse of sources is an apparent synthesis. The sources do not prove relevance of the Hungarian names in English.--Svetovid (talk) 13:33, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The sources don't need to prove English usage, only a Hungarian minority living there now or in the past. Read WP:NCGN. Squash Racket (talk) 13:55, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: And they don't even do this.--Svetovid (talk) 16:55, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

text: Please present sources and don't get personal. Your accusations are irrelevant to the topic.--Svetovid (talk) 16:55, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit war

message: Hi there. Surfing on the slovak wiki or any slovak Tatry-associated websites, it's unlikely not to be given an impression that Slovaks mistakenly take whole and entire Tatra range for Vysoke Tatry only. In other words, for Slovaks Tatry=Vysoke Tatry, as if the Zapadne Tatry and Belianske Tatry didn't exist at all. Maybe that's because of the name of the city which lies at the foot of Vysoke Tatry, called Vysoke Tatry (city) as well. The other probable cause might be the existance of totally separate and different mountain range, situated about 40 km south of Tatras, called Nizke Tatry (Low Tatras). As far as I'm concerned, they were originally named Niżnie Tatry, which could be translated into Southern Tatras. The error occured when non-slovak and non-polish cartographists (austro-hungarian) notoriously mistaken original slavic names for geographical objects. And so we had e.g. Velky Tatransky Krivan instead of Velky FATRANSKY Krivan, etc. It's for all to see on the old maps available on the internet.
This issue is being quite problematic, because whilst someone looks for an accomodation in Vysoke Tatry, a given slovak website shows him the search outcome in which there is e.g. Liptovsky Mikulas (which lies under Zapadne, not Vysoke Tatry) as well, etc.
Summa summarum, Slovaks cannot simply distinguish their greatest national treasure being all those amazingly beautiful carpathian subranges, a pearl of which being Tatry. Now this is quite sad, because a major part of that beautiful country is mountainous, so theoretically, you could expect the inhabitants to be fully aware of what is what and which range is which. Best regards to Slovaks. Please shift your conciousness in those terms. Thank you.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.12.91.242 (talk) 11:20, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slovak misunderstanding of the "Tatry' term 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Low Tatras. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080324022345/http://www.slovakia.travel/entitaview.aspx?l=2&sfv=False&llt=1&st=national%20park%20nizke%20tatry&smi=108032&ami=108032&idp=3998 to http://www.slovakia.travel/entitaview.aspx?l=2&sfv=False&llt=1&st=national%20park%20nizke%20tatry&smi=108032&ami=108032&idp=3998
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:20, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified