lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Okanogan

message: Mourning Dove (author) is often known as Okanogan Mourning Dove.  That's not on her page so left a query as to where it might be found; I know I've seen it in Canadian bookstores and articles, though where I'm not certain.  It may be in the Okanagan Historical Quarterly which should also be on here, as one of the longest-running historical quarterlies in British Columbia; maybe longer than the British Columbia Historical Quarterly, which also needs to be on here, and needs an article for sure.  Also the Okanagan Historical Society, which is the publisher of the Quarterly.Skookum1 (talk) 17:11, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two items not on here yet - no, three
Talk:Silver State Classic Challenge

message: 10/10/06 I set up an initial page today.  It's not completely wikified, but I'll fix it up.  I wasn't a competitor during the times when safety was more of a problem, so at the moment I only have basic information on the problems that used to exist.  NNH 23:53, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

message: Is it still true that the event allows people to enter rental cars as I have heard stories about people doing so and in another I heard that they are no longer allowed.
Willirennen 15.30 17 Octover 2006
There is no formal Silver State rule against entering a rental car, so long as it meets the class requirements for safety.  The minimum preparation level is to attach a fire extinguisher which is fairly simple.  However, it would almost certainly be a breach of the car rental company's terms and conditions.  At least one rental car took part in the September 2006 SSCC. NNH
NNH 15:53, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rental cars 

message: If there is a need to write any more about Big Bend, MKM etc, we should set up an Open Road Racing page, and individual pages for each of those organisations. --NNH 20:06, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Similar events

message: It would be great to get some pictures.  I think I have a photo of Big Red, so I'll go and dig around.NNH 17:23, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos of featured cars 

message: I think we could cut back here.  Inada's old Skyline and Pettit's Buick are pretty minor history.  Big Red is clearly a significant part of the event's history, and I can sort of see the case for Inada's latest car. NNH 21:40, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cut down on featured cars
Talk:Storybook architecture

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved to Storybook architecture. (closed by non-admin page mover) Vpab15 (talk) 20:54, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Storybook house →  – Sources use the term "Storybook style", article also describes some buildings built in this style that aren't houses. Lord Belbury (talk) 18:32, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point, agreed. --Lord Belbury (talk) 10:15, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 25 July 2022
Talk:Back-to-back house

message: I haven't got citations, but I know from experience (I used to live in one) that Bradford still has quite a lot of back-to-backs, either renovated into through-terraces or in their original form. The district around the university especially. The Bradford Museum also has a rebuilt row, showing their usage from the Victorian age to 1950s. This might be useful info, but I haven't got references at hand. If anyone can find them, it'd probably improve the article. --Filipek (talk) 00:04, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bradford 

message: Is the Birmingham example the last courtyard example surviving or isn't it? Apparently, the BBC says it is, but the next paragraph implies otherwise. 86.5.88.131 (talk) 07:15, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seems inconsistent?  

message: Some of the text on heritage value sounds, frankly, like advertising for the cause. As do the comments about relaxing building regulations. There are surely downsides here e.g. that whatever modcons you put in, you still have ventilation issues with only one exterior wall etc. I'm damn sure there are people who want building regulations further relaxed, but that's only one side. 86.5.88.131 (talk) 07:19, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doesn't always sound very neutral? 

message: The article describes this as UK housing, but all the examples are English. Was this form of housing found in the other countries of the UK? 86.5.88.131 (talk) 07:22, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  UK wide?
Talk:Excuses for Bad Behavior Part 2

message: I've been working hard on this, and I hope it looks alright. Please tell me what else I can do. -Acoustica 00:04, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately you've made a real mess of the page, and I don't think you have a real understanding of Wikipedia or the rules. You make a lot of statements that aren't factual and seem to be your personal opinions, and then you've posted links as citations to back up the statements, but the links don't have anything to do with the statements. Just as an example, you stated that this album was commercially and critically more successful than its predecessor; you then followed that with a citation that linked back to nothing more than a mirrored older version of this very Wiki-article on Bernhard. In point of fact "Excuses...Part Two" has received absolutely no critical note whatsoever, having not even been released on an actual record label but instead exclusively sold as burned CD-R's at Bernhard's shows and on her own website. Also, fan opinions and comments on message boards etc... are not notable. Midnightguinea 23:50, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  You can't make a comment like "The LGBT community approved of the album and show"; that would suggest that all gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgendered people globally endorsed the album, and that's just ludicrous. You can cite specific journalists who enjoyed the show, and you can mention content within the show which would make it appeal to gay people, but you can't make a sweeping generalization like this. Midnightguinea 23:51, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

message: After further reviewing this article and reading some of the references, I'm REALLY confused as to what the hell the former editor was doing. You state that Anna Farris is a friend of Bernhard's and that she contributed to this album, specifically to the track "Making Out With Britney Spears." I popped the album in to re-listen because I didn't remember this, and the track in question is a spoken word track that features ONLY Bernhard; Farris is nowhere to be found. The reference link you gave to back this assertion up went to a magazine interview BY Bernhard OF Farris; the article did not assert they are friends nor did it assert Farris appears on this album. You then also stated that "Some of Bernhard's fans did not like Farris' contribution" and then linked to someone's blog where they mentioned they were listening to their album collection alphabetically, and that Bernhard's OTHER album "Excuses for Bad Behaviour (Part One)" was on that list. It had NOTHING to do with your statement. I am now going to go through this entire article and check ALL of your references, because I don't believe ANY of them are going to end up being relevant at all!!! Midnightguinea 14:03, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anna Farris
Talk:Cyril Lord

message: This article represents work in progress.  I started from the Private Eye article, to hive off the various pieces which deal with the magazine's comments about prominent businessmen.  On investigation, I found that the articles for the Sixties businessmen whose activities they commented on are poor or non-existent.  In particular, Emil Savundra which I fixed, Jim Slater, John Bloom and Rolls Razor as well as Brentford Nylons.  This one is particularly interesting, as it involves an entrepreneur who went bust in Northern Ireland, which was tied up with the troubles and was a precursor to de Lorean.  It also ties in to television advertising in the early days.  There are several sources to write from, and it is taking longer than I anticipated.  To be honest, I am surprised that the article has not already been written.  I cannot guarantee to get finished in five days, but it should not be long now.
:Guy 00:11, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Work in progress
Talk:Amomum

message: This article needs a list of Amomum species.  Badagnani 00:17, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: List of species

message: Why is A. villosum not listed? Badagnani (talk) 00:37, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: A. villosum
Talk:Aviastroitel

message: Its link http://aviastroitel.nm.ru/ is dead. `'mikka (t) 00:27, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes it is. It seems to lead somewhere else now. - Ahunt (talk) 20:58, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: dead?

message: I have just finished a rather overdue expansion of this article and it became apparent during the writing that the company has once again changed its name this time from Aviastroitel to Glider Air Craft. Since company is still known in the English speaking world as Aviastroitel and the new name is generic in the extreme (you don't see GM calling itself the Car Making Company) I have not moved the article to the new company name, but rather redirected the new name here, in an attempt to use the common name as per WP:CRITERIA. If anyone thinks it should be moved then please discuss here. - Ahunt (talk) 20:58, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name
Talk:Wausaukee, Wisconsin

message: Look, I'm not generally one to argue, but the statistics on this page are extremely wrong.
http://www.city-data.com/city/Wausaukee-Wisconsin.html
THESE are the correct statistics
Whoever put these up has a terrible source. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.21.164.216 (talk • contribs).
:Actually I don't believe your source, and I have reverted it. Check out the 2000 census for the Town of Wausaukee, and you'll find the exact number (1197) that you had changed this article to. Also, the 1990 census found on an official Wisconsin highway map was 656. I'm sure the village didn't double from 1990 to 2000. I bet the city-data source used the town's population instead of the villages. Royalbroil 04:54, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Population discrepancy
Talk:Orchiopexy

message: The current WebMD link on the page doesn't seem to have a lot of information. I found the following link that has a lot of clear information, should we consider adding it as another external source?
https://medschool.cuanschutz.edu/surgery/divisions-centers-affiliates/pediatric/patient-care/orchidopexy
Omarshehata (talk) 15:45, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add link for university of colorado page on Orchiopexy?
Talk:Court shoe

message: Patent leather is considered traditional? I thought it was modern.
:No. Kan8eDie (talk) 00:36, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

message: I think this needs to be done, but I know nothing about women's clothing, so could someone please sort this out?— Kan8eDie (talk) 23:21, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: "Pump" has several different meanings when it comes to shoes, and the 'athletics shoes' meaning should not be merged here. The Pump (shoe) article would perhaps be better as a disambiguation page, which it almost is now.--Michig (talk) 07:00, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

text: Indeed, it now redirects to Pump (disambiguation), which now lists the various footwear meanings of "pump". -- Smjg (talk) 15:55, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with [[pump (shoe)]]

message: "Outside the fashion trade in the UK, the term "pumps" would normally imply flat or low heel dancing or ballerina pumps, or even rubber soled canvas plimsolls."  Are YOU KIDDING ME?  What about the massive Italian high end shoe industry that refers to these very shoes as pumps?  What about in the United States, where for the entire time I've lived here it's always been referred to as a pump.  Come on, get over your nationalism and realise that *much* of the Western World considers a "pump" to be a heeled shoe.  Do a search for them on Amazondotcom for "Womens Pumps".  I get 19,000 choices in "shoes." On the first page?  There's exactly ZERO pumps that are flats.  This BS about 'only the UK refers to these shoes as pumps' is nonsense and should be chucked.  Yesterday, already.  When I think of a "pump" I think of a Woman in her late 20s wearing a business-length skirt with stockings and a pair of 3-4" heeled (leather) pumps. And I'm *not* from the UK.
If it's gonna get it's own page, at least get the content correct.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.190.6.43 (talk) 17:07, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blahblah UK BS 

message: If you simply made a typo, then I apologize for ranting about it.  When I was typing it hadn't occured to me it may have been a simple mistake in "US" or "UK" or that maybe you meant "in the fashion culture of the UK pumps normally refer to a low heeled shoe."  I thought about it after I went back to the page and noticed that at the top it says "Court shoes (British English) or Pumps (American English).."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.190.6.43 (talk) 17:20, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  it's me again.. 

message: Where does the name come from?
Ceterum censeo: in Germany they're also known as 'pumps', although the word is usually pronounced very strangely here (viz., with the same vowel as in 'girls').--Cancun771 (talk) 10:37, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Etymology?

message: It would be nice if there was some HISTORY here. As it is now, it just tells us what we already know, what is a "pump". 76.121.143.28 (talk) 04:49, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  History???
Talk:Kingston Parish

message: Hi, BilCat. Regarding , it's my understanding (based on the first two sentences in the second paragraph of the Kingston, Jamaica article) that "Kingston and St. Andrew Corporation" technically refers to the combined local government bodies while "Greater Kingston" technically refers the area that they control. Is that incorrect? If so, the Kingston, Jamaica article should be fixed. But we should track down some sources (perhaps the text itself of the 1923 Kingston and St. Andrew Corporation Act defines the terms) to clarify the situation. Jason Quinn (talk) 10:49, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: BilCat. Ping bump. Jason Quinn (talk) 11:30, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: BilCat. Try #2. Jason Quinn (talk) 20:06, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Kingston and St. Andrew Corporation" vs "Greater Kingston"
Talk:The Face upon the Barroom Floor

message: There was a parody in Mad Magazine, which also appeared in the first MAD paperback... AnonMoos 00:37, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

message: Also used in a Three Stooges short titled Movie Maniacs (1936). Moe asks, "Now where are we going to find a new face for her?" Curley replies, "I know! The face on the barroom floor!"  Trigdog2002 (talk) 17:32, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The face on the barroom floor (poem)
File talk:Tower Bridge Sacramento edit.jpg

message: wow beautiful picture jak 00:44, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

message: or photoshopped......
"When preparing for display, a high dynamic range image is often tone mapped and combined with several full screen effects."(from wiki HDR article).
:If you would call e.g. Guernica a fake too, then sure it's a fake. In my opinion this photo of a bridge isn't any different than a painting. I mean it's a bridge. It's not like it's a orangutang with photoshopped wings to it.--NoNo 22:12, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  HDR does not represent the real image, so this image is fake
Talk:Indian National Congress (U)

message: 1978-80 was a confusing time, but not all members of the congress (U) went into the Congress (S). Jagjivan Ram was part of urs' party, and he split away first; YB Chavan left the party, anticipating a return to the Congress (I). The Congress (U) deserves its own page as the first proto-Third Front type thing, an national alliance of pure regional leaders. The rump of the Congress (U) did in fact become the Congress (S), but after its ranks were decimated and Sharad Pawar assumed command. Hornplease 00:46, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is not necessary that all original INC(U) members went along until the transformation into Congress (S) to merge the two pages. The Jagjivan split occured when Urs was still the party leader, and his departure does not affect the issue of an article merger (I hade an article on Congress (Jagjivan)). I cannot track exactly went Chavan left the party, put I don't see that Congress (U) would have been dissolved and that Congress (S) would have been a separate reorganisation. Thus Congress (U) changed name to Congress (S), thus it is one and same party and should have one article. --Soman 08:12, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Between May and September the Congress (U) lost most of its legislators in Maharashtra and the North and many of those in Karnataka as well, causing Urs himself to step down. The remainder of the party gathered for its conference and chose not to petition the election commission for recognition as the congress (u), along with its symbol etc. So in that sense as well, it was a completely new party. It was a 'successor' party in some sense. Carry out the following analogous thought experiment: if the CPI post-1962 had chosen to rename itself the CPI (Soviet), and to renounce any claim to the name and symbol of the undivided party, would we choose to merge articles for the undivided CPI and the CPI (Soviet), given also that a vast proportion of the undivided CPI had walked out? Hornplease 09:03, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Congress (S) shenanigans
Category talk:Radio and television announcers

message: I am not sure if this exists, we appear to have many British announcer articles featured here, do enough exist for them to gain their own individual category? I believe this is a section with scope for development of existing articles and further announcers on any television announcers in the UK. Col2006ie 00:59, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: New category: UK radio television announcers
Talk:Waitaha (South Island iwi)

message: Someone needs to tackle the (difficult) task of saying something NPOV about the sort of issues raised by:
* http://maorinews.com/writings/papers/other/makere.htm
* http://www.1421.tv/pages/evidence/content.asp?EvidenceID=295
* http://www.aocafe.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2668&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0&sid=d8c6b4ba584194d578fe5d792fc0af3d
Snori 00:49, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Congrats for taking up the challange Grimhim! I've trimmed and re-organised it again.Snori 22:24, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:911

message: There is so much 9/11 crap that it doesn't make sense to have them all listed.  Just the main reference to the actual attacks is sufficient.  Disambiguate other 911 references from the 9/11 attacks but no need for each thing on 9/11 attacks.--Tbeatty 01:04, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: What to disambiguate

message: 911 (disambiguation), there is absolutely no reason that I can see for the three dates to be listed which aren't connected in any way to the number 911. There is a link on that disambiguation page to the date page which lists all of the events that occured on that day anyway.
I propose to remove attica prison, Chilean coup and s11. Grumpyyoungman01 22:05, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  events on this page not connected to the phrase 911 

message: *Format the titles correctly
*Do not obscure article titles with pipe links
*Move the things more likely to be known as 911 before things less likely
*Move things that have 911 in their title but aren't known as 911 to See also
*Don't use section breaks for short lists
*Remove entirely things that happened to happen on Sept 11 or Nov 9 but aren't referred to as 911 from the list
-- JHunterJ (talk) 22:00, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup tasks 

message: I propose to add: Next Generation 9-1-1 - the new U.S. 9-1-1 infrastructure standard.  Comments? NextGen911 (talk) 18:08, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Propose adding a link 

message: Seems close enough to merge. Hyperbolick (talk) 16:34, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge [[9/11 (disambiguation)]] 

message: Editors are invited to comment on the RfC at Wikipedia talk:Article titles#RfC about articles on three digit numbers Wug·a·po·des​ 22:11, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfC of interest 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Talk:911 (disambiguation). Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Ssjhowarthisawesome (talk) 17:22, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Talk:911 (disambiguation)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect Nine Eleven has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  A smart kitten (talk) 11:44, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Nine Eleven]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect 9/11 (film has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Utopes (talk / cont) 21:16, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:9/11 (film]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Mule Barn, Oklahoma

message: I don't believe the Lat/Lon coordinates are correct. 198.133.100.130 01:07, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: As of 2022, the Census lists Mule Barn town as an incorporated place, GEOID 4049860. Someone should verify and correct the text. Dh10~enwiki (talk) 17:46, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  correct status
Talk:Shiva Sutras of Vasugupta

message: Recently material was added to this article that was pretty much a direct copy from here http://www.universalshaivafellowship.org/usf/teachings_02.html
This website has a very clear copyright notice on their front page so I have removed the material.
TheRingess 01:07, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent copyrighted material 

message: Found similar article here.--BALA. RTalk 15:24, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Two unrelated texts, as you could have made it out yourself upon reading both articles. Closing per WP:SNOW. — kashmīrī TALK 08:26, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:South Wisconsin District of the Lutheran Church – Missouri Synod

message: I am removing the extended list of congregations & missions.  I certainly see the value of an article on a middle judicatory for a major american denomination, but not for the directory style list. Athanasius • Quicumque vult  19:11, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:NOTDIR]] 
Talk:Adams–Stokes syndrome

message: On the "Signs and symptoms" part , you wrote
 ...Breathing continues normally throughout the attack...
 
As far as I know that is not true.You might see respiratory pauses during the attack.Please fix.
Here's a link : 
--NatK 01:19, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: On

message: The intro says nothing about what it is and is not grammatically correct (excluding content in parentheses): "Stokes–Adams syndrome the first description of the syndrome was published in 1717 by the Carniolan physician of Slovene descent Marko Gerbec, which was 44 years after its publication quoted by Giovanni Battista Morgagni." Someone with experience should revise this. It does not make good sense even based on the grammar too... Moresonic (talk) 07:45, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I restored the lead. Noca2plus (talk) 16:33, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Intro does not make sense

message: Is this article orphaned? Syntax and grammar seem a bit off imo...
Rettetasten (talk) 19:26, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  ???