Talk:Lutein

message: Should there be a note about white corn not being a good source of Luteins? I ask this since "corn" is listed and linked to as a good source of Luteins. I know that yellow corn is (5,276 micrograms versus the 279 in white corn as-per the USDA National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference) a good source of Luteins. I have yet to check out other forms of corn/maize due to a time crunch. Jamorton 02:02, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I suggest looking into the scientific literature. Icek 03:03, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

message: Why is there no mention of Lutein in the reproductive system? What is its role and where/how is it produced in response to Luteinizing Hormone? Anyone? Horia 23:28, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Because it apparently has no role there. What you probably mean is the corpus luteum which only shares the yellow color with the xanthophyll lutein. Icek 06:14, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Lutein in the reproductive system

message: This article talk page was automatically added with  banner as it falls under :Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 01:16, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:FOOD|WikiProject Food and drink]] Tagging

message: I see that a citation is needed in the section talking about lutein and zeaxanthin possibly preventing cataracts. I would like to offer this link as a possibility: http://www.the-lasik-directory.com/article_lutein_eye.html How can I add this link? Is this an acceptable resource? TaraPingle (talk) 00:18, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It now cites a non-commercial ref to one of the study reports. Rod57 (talk) 16:27, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

text: Three more references added (two secondary sources (meta-analyses) and one high-quality clinical trial).David notMD (talk) 15:08, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Citation for cataracts

message: In this article it is written that supplementation with lutein and zeaxanthin lower the risk of cataract formation; and there are studies cited wich conclude so.
In the article about zeaxanthin it is written that there is insufficient evidence to suggest that supplementation with zeaxanthin and lutein lowers the risk of cataract formation; and thee is a study cited wich concludes so.  
Now wich one should I accept? 84.0.42.178 (talk) 12:06, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: New references and text added here and to zeaxanthin article to eliminate contradiction.David notMD (talk) 12:10, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction with the zeaxanthin article 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Lutein. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130607222728/http://www.nei.nih.gov/news/pressreleases/050513.asp to http://www.nei.nih.gov/news/pressreleases/050513.asp
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150303184216/http://www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/foodcomp/search/ to http://www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/foodcomp/search/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:16, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified