Talk:David Ignatius

message: It may be worth noting to someone on the Davos incident, that not all members remained sitting as the Turkish Prime Minister left the stage. Arab Leader Amr Musa, clearly stood up to shake his hand as he left.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.126.199.22 (talk) 05:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Not everyone sitting down

message: It is a well know fact amongst Protocol advisors that physical contact should never be made with a Head of State or Head of Government, unless initiated by the Head of State or Head of Government. Prime Minister Erdogan himself has also stated in Istanbul that he was quite angered by the lack of respect shown and physical gestures made by the moderator. 
For this reason, it is said that the Turkish Prime Minister's Chief Advisors and Close Protection detail at Davos were quite angered at Mr. Ignatius for nudging the Turkish Prime Minister (on the shoulder) on several occassions in a bid to get him to stop his speeech.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.148.209.236 (talk) 02:27, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Physical contact between the Prime Minister of Turkey and David Ignatius at Davos

message: wiritten wrong. it must be "And so Davos is over for me from now on." icoulnd'y change it.--Tarihçi Selo (talk) 07:20, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: what PM of Turkey is said

message: His family  from Elazığ [ (, WA:Kharpert, Kurdish: Elezîz or Xarput) is a city in the Elazığ Province of eastern Turkey and the seat of the province. It has a population of 266,495 (2000 census). The city is 1067 meters above sea level. It occupies the location of what the Turkish, Zaza and Kurdish-speaking inhabitants of the region called Mezre or Mezra, meaning simply "a hamlet" in both Turkish and Kurdish. []
should be added here.--Tarihçi Selo (talk) 07:28, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: edition

message: This article previously compared Ignatius' novels to "spy novelist" Graham Greene, which is greatly reductive as Greene was firstly a noted international journalist, a member of the British foreign service, an acclaimed screenwriter & a writer of some of the most acclaimed literary novels of the 20th century who also enjoyed writing 'entertainment' novels from time to time, this is where his spy novels fit in, but they do not define his career.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.49.237.87 (talk) 16:04, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Graham Greene

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on David Ignatius. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110808114744/http://www.hks.harvard.edu:80/about/faculty-staff-directory/david-ignatius/(page)/faculty to http://www.hks.harvard.edu/about/faculty-staff-directory/david-ignatius/(page)/faculty
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:40, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: A section would be helpful for encyclopedic reference.  For Example;
https://www.washingtonpost.com/video/postlive/securing-tomorrow-with-david-ignatius-and-sen-bob-corker/2017/07/26/58a0e5ce-7224-11e7-8c17-533c52b2f014_video.html
with Bob Corker.
--Wikipietime (talk) 12:55, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Section Proposed for face to face interviews 

message: Why is there a link to biblical scholar Robert Alter one of three related articles? 
Wouldn't a better fit be a different Washington Post columnist, commentator on international relations, spy novelist, or St. Albans alum?  Bluespapa (talk) 18:43, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question about "Related Articles" in mobile view 

message: The section with a heading of "Controversy" states that Ignatius attempted to enforce time limits while acting as moderator of a discussion.
This does not seem like a controversial act.  Either the heading should be changed, or the section should be edited to better explain what the controversy was. 2601:281:CC80:5AE0:19F8:245A:C478:AA25 (talk) 04:41, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy?