Talk:Neo-Gramscianism

message: Looks like this article has been problematic at least since 2006, but even today, the article still doesn't give a definition of what Neo-Gramscianism actually is. The lead states:
* 
Saying what it applies doesn't equal saying what it is. Based on the current lead, it could be a political party, an ideology, a philosophical current, a religion, or even an onion or a pizza. To be serious, there are two ways from here: 
# 
# 
and we must pick what's best for the clarity of the article. Est. 2021 (talk · contribs) 21:28, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  August 2023 

message: Is this Theodore H. Cohen, Global Political Economy: Theory and Practice, (Longman, 2000)? Itsmejudith 21:49, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Close, its the 2005 edition. I put in proper refrences, sorry I left that in such a mess! It slipped my mind. I wrote a paper on neoGramscianism and have a ton of good academic articles on the subject. I just need to remember to update this when I get back from class! Exwizard 18:52, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cohen references 

message: This section is really weak. It just seems to accuse Neo-Gramscianism (along with all Marxism) of being utopian and idealistic (in the everyday sense). It needs filling in with criticisms from other Marxist schools, and other perspectives.Ad Nauseam
Agreed: it's a blatant attack on Marxist IR discourse; the author clearly has some bias. This has been flagged as an issue for over a year, and citations have not been added to this section. Given this length of time, it's reasonable to delete this section - which I have done. Of course, feel free to re-add the section with proper citations, but it shouldn't stand as is. 142.1.252.51 (talk) 21:51, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticisms 

message: Neo-Gramscian analysis has been criticized on a number of grounds. Some argue that neo-Gramscians, like other Marxists, put so much emphasis on the failings of capitalism (being the current hegemonic order) that they fail to see the problems with alternative systems.
—This is not a criticism if it's not saying WHY and HOW the problems with alternative systems are being overlooked.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.58.132.148 (talk) 22:36, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism 

message: I made some substantial edits to make this a bit more reader friendly, added two sources, and removed the "multiple issues" tag. BlueSalix (talk) 18:03, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Neo-Gramscianism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041214190007/http://www.theglobalsite.ac.uk/atlanticrulingclass/ to http://www.theglobalsite.ac.uk/atlanticrulingclass/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:13, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified