Talk:Porsche 928

message: None of the images in this article have any copyright info on them and unfortunately, the user who uploaded them, UNIXCOFFEE928, is no longer active. However, they don't appear to be blatant copyright violations. Should they be removed from the article and if so, should they be listed on Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images? SamH 19:02, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Images

message: UNIXCOFFEE928 The images are not copywritten, as previously discussed, and should be replaced to aid enthusiasts, who would like to get involved with the 928, but are unfamiliar with the model changes. That is why it was there. If more people re-vitalized 928s, and loved them, the model will have the potential to be re-released.
I am extremely unimpressed with the changes that you have made to this page. The next time you decide to be a specialist, why not leave the hard work of others intact, and add to it, instead of throwing away many hours of work. I put a lot of time into making an entry for the 928, and some 911-centric editor decides to have a field day re-writing history to justify his current porsche purchase!!! This entry is now very heavilly skewed, and will be revised.
:Hi UNIXCOFFEE. The images were deleted because they didn't have any source or copyright information on their image description pages, and I couldn't find any info elsewhere. I agree it's a shame that this page no longer has any images. If those photos are available freely (i.e. in the public domain or under a free licence such as the GFDL), then maybe you could re-upload them, but this time including the proper info. 
:Regarding the rest of the article, I'm sorry if you feel I have damaged your work, but I have only tried to improve it. Could you be more specific about what parts of this article you think are skewed?   I hope we can work together on this. SamH|Talk 17:59, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Images & the Current Edit

message: This page is in desperate need of some copyediting. Many of the sentences are missing useful things like articles. For example: To achieve performance expected from Porsche and at same time comply with strictening emission requirements it was deemed engine needed to have fairly large displacement. -- some as, ans and thes would make this readable. Also, I don't think that strictening is a real word. Pburka 23:01, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Articles 

message: I read that Porsche is planning a new 928 for 2010. Does anyone have any pictures?
Yeah.... Do anybody have pictures? If so please post them!
:As a grand tourer, the successor I think you are referring to would be the Porsche Panamera which may be made available as a 2-door (see the bottom of this article). There are pics of the 4-door car on google. The pics where it has Carrera GT-style rear lights are probably the more recent ones. 
:dsandlund 15:34, March 19 2006 (CET)
Road and Track magazine punlished a small priece on the possiblity of a reborn 928 riding on a shortened version of the Panamera's platform debuting sometime around 2010, but it was purely speculative, Porsche hasn't made any statements one way or the other.
I have edited the article to reflect that Porsche has made no confirmation in the three years after these rumors. Realistically this points to these rumors having been false, the article should be clear and not further these rumors until such time that there is some official announcement. Wikipedia is not for speculation and gossip, not to be rude.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.95.202.43 (talk) 03:04, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: A New 928?

message: does anyone know what year was the switch from steel sunroof to glass moonroof.  It doesn't seem to be mentioned anywhere, but I can see a 95 gts with a moonroof and 80's models with a metal sunroof, just wondering where the split is. 
71.207.156.16 01:57, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  moonroof switchover 

message: I make a move that we delete or greatly reduce the size of this section. There is nothing wrong with the information, but the section is way too big now.
Zach4636 (talk) 17:29, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It should be in small tables, the page could have also couple of pictures more... --— Typ932T | C  17:32, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleting a section 

message: *https://www.hagerty.com/apps/valuationtools/1978-porsche-928
*https://www.hagerty.com/articles-videos/articles/2012/07/20/buyers-guide-porsche-928
*https://jalopnik.com/5321705/porsche-928-despite-costing-as-much-as-10-pintos-when-new
*http://www.928oc.org/928-resources/2015-01-23-21-15-13/model-info/78-82-model-info
*Xb2u7Zjzc32 (talk) 22:08, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: MSRP

message: I fail to see why fitting some powerful engine into a car and using it to drive quickly is relevant for an article about a production car. Are we going to see every production car article infested with records set by one-offs? Greglocock (talk) 21:45, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Closed Course Speed Record 

message: Quite why Autoweek described this fat thing as a supercar is a bit of a mystery, but I suppose back then the UK motoring press were still worshipping Porsche and BMW. It certainly doesn't fit the European usage of the term at the time. Greglocock (talk) 22:43, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Supercar? Peacockism in the lede