lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Delta Works

message: Maybe somebody would like to add a link in the proper way and place to a GoogleMaps image of the Maaslantkering; http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?ll=51.955976,4.164333&spn=0.033989,0.063343&t=k&hl=en
thanks ;-) MSpreij
This entry is very minimal - I found it difficult to obtain any kinds of statistics for the Delta Works.  Can anyone provide more information?
I added some information through links a few days ago and restructured the article. I hope this gives some more information. Blue Henk 12:03, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What is the cost to build and maintain the dike system? Dansample 07:06, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It was build for 2.36 billion euro (as in 1986), it costs 17 million euro per year to operate.(see  in Dutch). Felsir 13:42, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cost

message: Does anyone have a source for this number? Seems an awful lot to me, especially considering we have just 3268km of highway and the total area of the Netherlands is about 16000 square miles. I can't find any sources in the Dutch wikipedia
Omegium (talk) 23:42, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  10,250 Miles of dike? 

message: This article contradicts Netherlands#Delta works, which says the project ended around 2002. This article says it ended in 1997. TheUnixGeek (talk) 18:27, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction 

message: This article is terrible. It goes straight from the lead-in to history, without at any stage describing its subject matter. It needs ground-up rewriting using verifiable sources, better flow and a focus on what people want to know about a large civil engineering project. Hint: Its political history is pretty low on the list. Wayne Hardman (talk) 00:34, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite 

message: Since this project had a lot of impact on the existing ecosystems and these impacts influenced the decision making process, I think this page could definitely have at least a section with: Consequences. Anyone who disagrees? 
Marijnekramer (talk) 20:25, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Environmental impact and policies
Talk:USS Sirago

message: At 05:41 on 26 June 2005, 203.134.87.136 added an external link to http://albums.photo.epson.com/j/View?u=4014388&a=30130768&p=60807564&Sequence=0 without providing any copyright information. (And, incidently, didn't work — Wikipedia won't show external images.) At 06:07 that same morning, the Epopt reverted that edit and downloaded the image, trying briefly to find a name or any copyright information to associate with it.  At 06:28, the Epopt uploaded that image to Wikipedia, noting that it was possibly unfree, and included it in this article.  However, if no credible copyright information is found or provided by 26 July 2005, the Epopt will delete this image.  203.134.87.136 is welcome to explain the source of the photograph and license it to us — it's a great picture! ➥the Epopt 14:38, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Touchscreen

message: i was looking through this article and noticed some unusual formatting in the history section, which appears to have been intended as a named list.
how exactly would i go about fixing this unusual formatting while going with the original intent of the editor? 216.100.95.82 (talk) 18:36, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Be bold and go ahead to fix them than having someone to do it. 2001:EE0:4BC2:15B0:49A4:5AB0:3C6E:D99E (talk) 11:57, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

text: I noticed this as well and also unsure how to fix this. I think the only two options are either splitting the "bullet points" into a group of headers, or just getting rid of them entirely and trying to just make it flow together as one big historical group of paragraphs. I might try my hand at it later when I'm out of my work meetings Myforce2001 (talk) 13:55, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  unusual formatting
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Wikiportals

message: A few friendly observations:
First, I don't think it makes sense to ask groups to join this project as participants and discourage individuals.  Groups of people don't edit pages.  Individual people do.  The point of a WikiProject is to rally individuals and coordinate their efforts.  It doesn't matter whether or not someone has "joined" one of the projects they want to improve.  I've certainly seen in practice that all "members" do not necessarily particpate in a project, and not everyone who is participating is actually signed up as a "member".  Membership seems more like a sort of casual endorsement that the project is a good idea.  Moreover, not everyone who thinks a given project is a good idea or who wants to participate in it will think a meta-project is a good idea or will want to participate in it.  In the same way that not everyone who edits articles wants to edit the containing categories, or cares much about them.
Second, I'm not sure this page is really needed.  Each Wikiporal has to have a community of people interested in the subject who create and maintain it.  It doesn't really work to have a community of people who are only interested in the concept of Wikiportals in general to try to spawn new ones; they will soon become neglected.  It is a good idea to have a coordination point for doing improvements across all portals, or discussion technical or community aspects about the concept in general.  But we already have Wikipedia:Wikiportal giving advice about Wikiportal best practices, and the talk page there discussion the creation of new ones, how they should be constructed and used, etc.  This project seems largely redundant to that, which, combined with the discouragement of individuals from joining, is probably why it currently has no participants signed up.
I would recommend redirecting this project to Wikipedia:Wikiportal and merging and cleaning up the mutual content. -- Beland 19:40, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your observations, Beland. I had it in my mind that there should be a WikiProject of this nature, but I'm not sure now. It does seem redundant to the Wikipedia:Wikiportal page and its discussion page, which does enjoy participation. This WikiProject, I intended to feed into the Wikipedia:WikiProject_Main_Page one, which is now on VfD. This one should probably be deleted also. At the time I created the two projects, I thought User:Ancheta_Wis might have been interested in the schema, but that appears not to be the case. The intent was to create a scheme to integrate Wikipedia:WikiProject_Categories, Wikipedia:WikiProject and Wikipedia:Wikiportal into one big happy family to help out with Wikipedia:Browse. I reckon that's not a reasonable proposal. Thanks for your comments. :) Quinobi 20:21, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I implemented the merger. -- Beland 06:07, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Status of this page
Talk:Prometheus (disambiguation)

message: Please don't add links to Star Trek, etc.  See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_%28disambiguation_pages%29 for more info. Mat-C 15:16, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Is there an article that can be linked that has information about that mod? Propaniac (talk) 12:50, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

text: I don't believe so, but there should be.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Minifig3D (talk • contribs) 13:41, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The purpose of a disambiguation page isn't to list every meaning of a term; it's to direct users to the article with the information they're trying to find. If there's an article where users looking for information about that mod can be directed, it should be included here, but if there's no article with any information about it then there's no reason to list it here. Propaniac (talk) 17:45, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Porklips Now

message: Many thanks to whoever turned the acting credits into links, but I fear the articles linked merely refer to persons of the same name, not the actual actors. jamesgibbon 15:31, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Julia Mullock

message: Apparently plans are firming up to make a movie of Princess Julie's life - see  --Dan 14:49, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biographical Movie 

message: Phrases should  clarify  more than confuse.
&,  Jewish?
 hopiakuta  Please do  sign  your  signature  on your  message.  %7e%7e   Thank You. - 21:45, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The tag about confuse and so forth was placed by a bot. I deleted it because those bots are often more confusing than helpful. I didn't check, but I think it was Smackbot. 
The bit about Julia being Jewish was, as I said, something my wife told me - and she knew Julia fairly well for several years around the time of Prince Eun's final illness and death, late 60s. --Dan (talk) 17:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please do help w/ where, when, how, why[[ who_what_when_where_why |,]].... 
Talk:Jeju International Airport

message: I'm surprised that Japan Airlines nor All Nippon Airways serve this island- the largest number of foreign travelers on Jeju are from Japan.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.81.97.200 (talk) 10:59, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

message: I heard that Jeju Air now serves Hong Kong. Can this be verified and added to the appropriate list?
Ld80061 (talk) 21:28, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Hong Kong
Talk:Jang Hyuk

message: It's linked to some other actress that is not his wife - know the difference.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.203.117.186 (talk) 04:36, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Kim Yeo-jin is not his wife
Talk:McKesson Europe

message: Hi there,
I just wanted to change the title of Celesio in "Celesio AG" could somebody help me with that??? I don´t know how I can do that.
Thank you...
* Talk:Celesio — Celesio → Celesio AG – The correct German name of this company is Celesio AG. -carinchen- 12:21, 18 October 2005 (CET)
:AG just means plc. It's part of the legal name, but not part of the name people use in everyday language - and it's the latter which Wikipedia considers when thinking about article names (Wikipedia:Naming_conventions). Rd232 18:56, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Result: page not moved. Eugene van der Pijll 21:24, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change title
Talk:Psion (comics)

message: The material picked here is from cosmic teams (link included on the Psions page.  Author has given permission. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sunburst (talk • contribs) 
:The Cosmic Teams site has a few errors on it, the pact was between Oa and the Spider Guild, not the Psions. --68.81.70.65 (talk) 02:13, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lawhill

message: My father, Fred J. Buchholtz, sailed aboard the LAWHILL as second mate in 1909-1911. The ship left New York on October 10th, 1909, and first sailed to the Solomons via the Cape of Good Hope. From there, she went on to DaNang, Haiphong, Manilla, Hong Kong, Samoa, and returned to New York via Cape Horn, arriving on January 21st, 1911. The entire voyage was about 45,000 miles long. I have a wonderful set of glass slides he made of this voyage, which are still in remarkably good shape.
Stan Buchholtz
sbuchholtz1@earthlink.net — Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.235.199.137 (talk) 16:04, 26 June 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Cool! Any chance you could scan a few in? I'll bet they would make excellent illustrations. Stan 23:35, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: I visited the island Tristan da Cunha on 15 April 2006 with the Barque "Europa". The weather was favourable so we could make a landing. On my walk over the island, I visited the graveyard. I found there the grave of Captain Arthur Soderlund, for many years Master of the 4-mast barque "Lawhill".
Captain Soderlund died by a tragic accident on board the fishing vessel "Frances Repetto" the 15th of May 1954. The fishing vessel was owned by the Tristan Development Company from Cape Town.
In 1959 I was 3rd officer on board the "Straat Mozambique" when we rescued the "Frances Repetto" in the South Atlantic with motor damage on her way from Tristan da Cunha to Cape Town; we towed the vessel to Cape Town. JacSpaans@xs4all.nl — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jac Spaans (talk • contribs) 08:47, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grave of Arthur Soderlund, former master of the Lawhill
Talk:Deputy Prime Minister of Spain

message: There is a big naming problem with this article. As you will see in the article on the Prime Minister of Spain, Spain hasn't got a President but a Prime Minister, but as in Spanish he is referred to as Presidente del Gobierno this causes a lot of confusion. Therefore, the Spanish Vicepresidente Primero actually means Vice President of the Government (not of Spain). The title is actually equivalent to that of Deputy Prime Minister. So, I think the article should be named either: 
*First Vice President of the Government (Spain)  
*First Deputy Prime Minister (Spain)   
*First Vice Prime Minister (Spain) (problem with this one: no such position exists anywhere as far as I know)  
For the time being I'm going to change the heading of the list to "List of First Vice Presidents of the Government of Spain". I'm also going to extend it with content from the Spanish article and explain the terminology slightly. 
Does anyone know how to change the name of the article (a redirect would be kept, of course)? Which of the three options (or any others) do you think is most appropiate?
--Daniel Medina 16:18, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Problem with title and naming conventions
Talk:Guglielmi detachable coil

message: I removed a long block of text that was copy and pasted from cerebral aneurysm as that text had been edited, and is subject to some debate. The text is still available there. I also believe it is more appropriate to discuss the long-term efficacy of GDC coils in treating cerebral aneurysms on the aneurysm page, as GDC coils themselves can be used in different parts of the body, and this article should be more about the coils themselves (including history, if someone knows more about that) than debates about treatment for aneurysms
--Felgerkarb 20:56, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cerebral Aneurysms

message: I disaggree that this article is of low importance.  No-one outside the field has any idea what one of these is or does; I would imagine that anyone coming across it in another wiki artilce is likely to click the link to find out.  If this coil can be used in a number of other procedures apart from aneurisms; if it is so new it is still being studied for its long term effects; if it has the potential to stop us doing dangerous surgery, then it is of mid importance.  
*How does it work?
*how was it discovered?
*what other procedures can it be used in?
Thank you for writing this much- please tell us more!
IceDragon64 (talk) 12:29, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importance 

message: I started a new section to address the very valid concerns that IceDragon64 stated above. Specifically I tried to explain how GDC coils work. More work is definitley needed though!THe link to Emory health that I used is great and has lots of information for anyone else interested in adding more. 
RNwumeh (talk) 04:21, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Adding Mechanism of function
Talk:Rabbinic authority

message: Placing them here if someone cares to summarise in better copy writing. I.am.a.qwerty (talk) 23:17, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lenghty quotes
Talk:Brandon School (Goleta, California)

message: I would like this to be included in Wikiproject Schools, so this page need constant development, like many other near-stubs. --Member 9 July 2005 00:50 (UTC)
----
This page has been previously nominated for deletion.  See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Brandon School (GUSD) for the result.  JYolkowski // talk 17:31, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Talk:W. I. Shakespear

message: #REDIRECT Talk:William Shakespear (explorer)
Here I'll the story of this man death, because I have no sources. Captian Shakespear had gold teeth and gold was very much coveted by the bedouins, so a group of them from Ibn Rashids camp made a special squad to get Shakespear at the next battle. In the battle they shot him and took his gold teeth out. Sometimes it's not very smart to flaunt it! --145.94.41.95 17:36, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Tremor

message: In the last revision I edited, I found duplicate named references, i.e. references sharing the same name, but not having the same content. Please check them, as I am not able to fix them automatically :) 
* "pmid7001967" :
** Jankovic J, Fahn S. Physiologic and pathologic tremors. Diagnosis, mechanism, and management. Ann Intern Med. 1980;93:460-5. PMID 7001967
** .
DumZiBoT (talk) 07:07, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bot report : Found duplicate references ! 

message: Is the "Restless Leg Syndrome" a form of Tremor at rest?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.68.106.3 (talk) 07:37, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No. It is an irresistible urge to move one's leg, arm, chest, pphantom limbs etc. A tremor is 100% involuntairy, and comes without notice or other symptoms (usually), and has a very short active phase, and then it doesnt recur again in any predictable manner; compare with RLS, which will continually bother a single area. 96.28.157.126 (talk) 06:39, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restless leg syndrome - Tremor at rest? 

message: See http://www.ninds.nih.gov/disorders/tremor/detail_tremor.htm
Liberal Classic (talk) 18:30, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:   Etiologies and Diagnosis sections coped from NIH? 

message: At the bottom of the etiologies list, I have placed a short reminder that all of those things can also be a result of panic with no other underlying problem. It should be made clear when something is catastrophically likely to happen, or has such a ridiculously low chance to the point where you get sicker by worrying about it. 96.28.157.126 (talk) 06:34, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comfort Text. 

message: Is this a joke? "A very common tremor is the chattering of teeth, usually induced by cold temperatures or by fear." And it's been put in the top paragrah too... 182.255.99.214 (talk) 12:28, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Chattering of teeth" = tremor? 

message: What the heck is a trunk?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.201.89.236 (talk) 22:48, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trunk? 

message: Under Categories, "resting tremors" includes and links to "essential tremors", but that page specifically says "It is not a resting tremor" and links back here.
Obviously, both cannot be true.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.97.72.228 (talk) 22:00, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Essential tremors are or are not resting tremors? 

message: Hi, would febris undularis belong here?  T 46.212.185.190 (talk) 12:53, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Schüttelfrost
Talk:Ramesses X

message: Please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ancient Egypt#Ramses/Rameses/Ramesses. –Hajor 18:07, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for comments: Ramses/Rameses/Ramesses

message: There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Ramesses - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 04:40, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Ramesses IX

message: Please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ancient Egypt#Ramses/Rameses/Ramesses. –Hajor 18:07, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for comments: Ramses/Rameses/Ramesses

message: I have no idea who Christian Settipani is, and why he is now referenced a large number of Ancient Egyptian articles. He doesn't appear to be a professional Egyptologist (and is described as 'Technical Director of an IT company in the Paris area.'). Anyone know whether they are a reliable source ? Markh 19:49, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Who is Christian Settipani?

message: There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Ramesses - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 04:40, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Ramesses VIII

message: Please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ancient Egypt#Ramses/Rameses/Ramesses. –Hajor 18:07, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for comments: Ramses/Rameses/Ramesses

message: There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Ramesses - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 04:40, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Ramesses VII

message: Please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ancient Egypt#Ramses/Rameses/Ramesses. –Hajor 18:07, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for comments: Ramses/Rameses/Ramesses

message: There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Ramesses - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 04:40, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Ramesses VI

message: Please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ancient Egypt#Ramses/Rameses/Ramesses. –Hajor 18:07, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for comments: Ramses/Rameses/Ramesses 

message: Your picture of Ramses 6 from "le musee du louvre" is uncertain to be Ramses 6.
They note "Profil royal, sans doute Ramsès VI":
http://www.insecula.com/contact/A001737_oeuvre_2.html
Go to British museum, you will find a real picture of Ramses 6: 
British Museum, Sculptures égyptiennes 
http://www.insecula.com/oeuvre/photo_ME0000086163.html 
http://www.insecula.com/oeuvre/photo_ME0000086164.html
--84.130.38.154 13:34, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The picture of Ramses 6 

message: I meant can someone narrow the info box on this page and fit it to the right? I put it at the end because it dominated right across the article and messed with the text. Couldn't manage to make it like others so I don't know what's needed. Julia Rossi 23:17, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a good one! The reason is because the Horus name is so long, and the pharaoh infobox template is not meant to break in the middle of a cartouche. There are a few possible solutions I can think of offhand: a) alter the template (hard), b) take the template's HTML and add only the HTML (medium), c) "stack up" some of the heiroglyphic characters vertically in the cartouche, (relatively easy). The last one may be artistic license, but I believe would still be valid. Cheers! Captmondo 23:57, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Info box help

message: There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Ramesses - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 04:40, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: But that was in an old book, did Egyptologists used to view his genealogy differently?--JaredMithrandir (talk) 19:31, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: You're probably confusing Ramesses V with Ramesses VI. The former was Ramesses VI's predecessor and nephew. Very old books sometimes mistakes the Ramessid numerations. Khruner (talk) 16:20, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  Actually some Egyptologists did say that Ramses VI was a grandson of Ramses III, however these theories have been dispelled now.Iry-Hor (talk) 07:49, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Research about ancient Egypt is STILL ongoing. 2A00:23C7:5882:8201:95C7:89D4:717:5483 (talk) 19:59, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'd read that he was the Grandson rather then son of Ramesses III?