Talk:Delivery after previous caesarean section

message: The text is identical to the section in the caesarean section article. This article is redundant.
-Juansmith 22:02, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: The article states that VBAC is incredibly risky and declining, while simultaneously hinting it might be safe. NPOV is one thing, but this is just weaseling out of the controversy.128.97.244.205 (talk) 03:31, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Confusing

message: One of the first 3 links gave me a virus so I deleted all three:
	 	
*www.(vbac.com) A user friendly website that guides women through what a VBAC is and holds a large amount of information and resources for women in all stages of learning about VBAC.
	 	
*www.(doulamatch.net) A website that can help women find a doula in their area, as well as read reviews about them.
	 
*www.(dona.org)/mothers/find_a_doula.php A website that can also help women find a doula, as well as offering a large amount of helpful information on what a doula is and what they do.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.166.194.10 (talk) 22:06, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Virus in external link 

message: I removed the following sentence because it doesn't say what situation it is compared to:
*The risk of post-operative infection doubles if vaginal delivery is attempted but results in another Caesarean.
I also removed the following sentence, because it is essential to compare ERCS with intention to perform VBAC, because if you leave out those who end up with a Caesarean anyway, including ones done in emergency, you'll inevitably make VBAC look more favorable:
*The benefits of VBAC are associated with avoiding the risks of major abdominal surgery. Compared to women who have elective repeat cesarean deliveries, women who undergo VBAC, have smaller risks of hemorrhage and infection and have faster recovery times.
The following sentence does not really belong in this article, but in the general Caesarean section article:
*In the past, Caesarean sections used a vertical incision which cut the uterine muscle fibres in an up and down direction (a classical Caesarean). Modern Caesareans typically involve a horizontal incision along the muscle fibres in the lower portion of the uterus (hence the term lower uterine segment Caesarean section). The uterus then better maintains its integrity and can tolerate the strong contractions of future childbirth. Cosmetically, the scar for modern Caesareans is below the "bikini line".
Mikael Häggström (talk) 14:44, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments after rewriting what was already given here 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Delivery after previous Caesarean section. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100723112411/http://www.acog.org:80/from_home/publications/press_releases/nr07-21-10-1.cfm to http://www.acog.org/from_home/publications/press_releases/nr07-21-10-1.cfm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:25, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Delivery after previous Caesarean section. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120621050450/http://www.americanpregnancy.org:80/labornbirth/vbac.html to http://www.americanpregnancy.org/labornbirth/vbac.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130217122109/http://www.childbirthconnection.org/pdfs/cesarean-section-trends.pdf to http://www.childbirthconnection.org/pdfs/cesarean-section-trends.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:27, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Delivery after previous Caesarean section. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.americanpregnancy.org/labornbirth/vbac.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141207031819/https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/gtg4511022011.pdf to https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/gtg4511022011.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:51, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:08, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion