Talk:Audio time stretching and pitch scaling

message: I propose the article be named Audio timescale/pitch modification or something similar, since it is not always stretching, not always a constant scaling, not always timescale, etc.  it is longer, but more accurate.  I hope to add more detailed information to the article soon, but for now, does anyone have an opinion on a different name? Omegatron
Ok, I moved it to Audio timescale-pitch modification.  Originally I used a slash but then i realized it looked like a subpage in the address bar.  Let me know if i was a bad wikipedian. Omegatron
: I agree that timestretching without changing pitch, or pitch shift without changing the time duration, both use the same algorithms.
: But since we *percieve* time duration as something independent of pitch, that is the entire point of trying to adjust one without adjusting the other.
: Perhaps it would be better to have 2 pages ( timestretching and pitch shift ), one on the applications of time stretching, the other one on the applications of pitch shifting, since they *seem* to be 2 different things.
: (But we only need a detailed description of the algorithms on one page).
: --68.0.120.35 23:03, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *The split appears to have been done. Should this article now be renamed? SilkTork *YES! 11:58, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  naming 

message: whoever wrote this artical on timestretching without mentioning the S950, S1000, S2000 needs to think if they deserve life on earth!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.144.225.53 (talk) 00:35, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  No mention of AKAI? who wrote this artical? 

message: :Audio timescale-pitch modification →  – The previous name with slash for "and/or" made more sense; the hyphen makes no sense, as it seems to be about a "timescale pitch".  There is no restriction on slashes in titles as there once was. Dicklyon (talk) 06:53, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: NoeticaTea? 05:12, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: MOS:SLASH isn't totally clear whether the spaced or unspaced would be better when on item is hyphenated, but I've gone with unspaced to go with the hyphenated "time-scale".  It's also not totally clear that the slash in unavoidable, but I don't see a correct way to do it with hyphen or en dash.  The trouble is that we have a sort of "or" title, plus we have another overlapping article.  So works remains to finish this or find a better solution.  Thanks for your comments.  Dicklyon (talk) 16:44, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem. Your present solution fits with MOS style guidelines, and also with many occurrences "out there". A spaced slash would only be an option if one element already included a space ("to separate items that include at least one internal space (the NY 31 east / NY 370 exit), where for some reason use of a slash is unavoidable", at WP:MOS). NoeticaTea? 23:14, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

text: "Time-scale modification" is indeed a better alternative per .  I'll just move it and cancel the RM.  Dicklyon (talk) 06:34, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move (withdrawn) 

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
* WP:SNOW close please.  The proposal is too flawed to bother with more.  A new proposal can be entertained when/if someone wants to work on the issues below.  Dicklyon (talk) 18:42, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Audio time-scale/pitch modification. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060902102443/http://cid.lib.byu.edu/?p=128 to http://cid.lib.byu.edu/?p=128
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:05, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This was the original time stretcher. --2A02:A310:8043:9A00:FC99:9DA6:ADCA:F986 (talk) 14:23, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where's the Zeitregler?