lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ramco Systems

message: Mr James
Ramco is not the world leader in aviation software. What is the source for that? The building posted is not their own too. It was sold.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Levitra123 (talk • contribs) 10:39, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The source for the claim of being the world leader is that which is cited in the article. If you have good reason for doubting the reliability of the source than please state your reason here. Likewise if you know of another reliable source which contradicts this one. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:21, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  World leader? 

message: This article needs to be cleaned up.  It reads like an advertisement. -- Sperril 09:08, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I still feel the tone of the article is rather advertisement-like, but I agree that the blatant advertising has gone, so I shall remove the advert template. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:02, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

text: There are various deletion processes, but most of them involve deleting whole pages, not just parts of the edit history. I am not sure what would best cover your case, but you may like to try oversight. If you click on that link you will find a page which says that editing history can be deleted under some circumstances, including Removal of potentially libelous information when the subject has specifically asked for the information to be expunged from the history, the case is clear, and there is no editorial reason to keep the revision. The page explains how to request oversight. I hope this helps. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:02, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Ad

message: Logo to be changed plz. The new logo looks absolutely nice.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by VishravarsP (talk • contribs) 04:56, 2 March 2007
There is a new logo that has changed in the last year. How can i submit it ? here is how the logo looks now http://ramcoaviation.com/
it has a different color layout/ gradient format
Wikiupdaterrr (talk) 16:34, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Logo

message: There is currently a line in the article (last line of first section) about Ramco causing cancer in california that is obviously rubbish.
Please delete / clean up. Thanks!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.192.229.226 (talk) 14:55, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Irrelavant Content 

message: I noticed that Ramco Group doesn't have its own article but many of its companies/former companies do. Does it merit one? I'll take a stab at looking for reliable sources. Cheers. Scheianf (talk) 20:03, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  New page? 

message: CV like contents recently added. potential COI Graywalls (talk) 21:50, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI tag (September 2023)
Talk:Heathrow arrival stacks

message: I'm not familiar with the incident mentioned, however it is worth mentioning whether the aircraft came within 600 feet laterally or vertically.  Aircraft can be vertically separated by 600 feet and still be within the legal 'standard separation' as Air Traffic Controllers know it.  Laterally is a different kettle of fish, though. 
Keen though the VATSIM virtual on-line ATC people no doubt are, it is not real-life and therefore I don't think that they are an authoritative source of information regarding real life ATC procedures.  The first line of the linked page contained a major inaccuracy, therefore I've deleted the reference.
BaseTurnComplete 22:26, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This makes no sense as an standalone article. It should be merged into the main Heathrow Airport article. I don't see other stack articles relating to major airports worldwide. --91.125.44.117 (talk) 17:38, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger discussion
Talk:Kooyong, Victoria

message: Is Kooyong actually a suburb? I am not sure it is.Peter C Talk! 22:28, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bioconversion

message: Is this a biological process or merely a dictdef of the word?  More detail is required to make this in to a proper article.  (aeropagitica)  22:31, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Pink Mountain, British Columbia

message: Factual inaccuracies and further information regarding this entry are as follows:
1. The unincorporated community of Pink Mountain is named after the mountain of the same name, some ten kilometres in on the mile 143 road. A weather station and abandoned wildfire post are located at the summit.
2. Pink Mountain is so named for the pink rock which can be found on the mountain.
3. The pink rock has been so coloured by ancient fires within the mountain itself along coal streams.
4. The attempt to link the name of Pink Mountain with that of fireweed blossoms (a la http://www.britishcolumbia.com/regions/towns/?townID=3621) is false. Although the plant does grow in abundance in the area, the mountain itself is too high for the plant to grow along near the summit. 62.56.97.230 23:53, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Guest from the Future

message: Did this film inspire the band's name? Daniel Case 04:34, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You meant ru:Гости_из_будущего ? almost certainly. 176.195.99.213 (talk) 20:51, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

message: This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB.
Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 20:02, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "needs infobox" tag 

message: "One Hundred Years Ahead " is reduced translation, loosing word play, which is maybe significant plot-wise. Pity.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.195.99.213 (talk) 20:54, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original novel title 

message: Especially regarding any foreign broadcasts (also, this)...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.189.187.62 (talk) 20:10, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Company & Channels" section needs proper citation
Talk:Life Chain

message: This is a work-in-progress you might say. I know it's kind of messy at the moment - hopefully by next week I'll have turned it into a decent article. --Nerd42 (talk) 22:36, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This is the largest national Pro-Life activism group/annual event in the United States. It is also the most mainstream of any of these groups I can think of, it gets in the local news pretty much everywhere it's done every year, which collectively makes alot of news. The trouble isn't that the article is unimporant, the trouble is that wikipedia didn't have one yet until today and I'm trying to fix that. LOL --Nerd42 (talk) 22:54, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I judged importance about what I saw written.  It now shows importance.  I am not sure if it really is important but it says it is now.  So, I removed the tag.  I can only judge that based on what is written... it didn't seem important but I didn't want to speedily deleted since it did look like a work in progress.  Now if anyone wants to do anything they'd have to use AfD.  Honestly, I don't know enough about it. gren グレン ? 23:28, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It still needs work. I certainly don't want a wikipedia article to leave people with that feeling LOL --Nerd42 (talk) 20:53, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importance??
Talk:The Man Without a Past

message: I would like to submit as an EXTERNAL LINK a review of The Man Without a Past.  Here's the linik:  http://www.artsandopinion.com/2003_v2_n3/lewis-4.htm
Thanking you for the consideration,
Robert Lewis Artsandopinion (talk) 17:47, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Näköradiomiehen ihmeelliset siekailut

message: The article states: Näköradiomiehen ihmeelliset siekailut (English: The Marvellous Adventures of a TV Man)
The title of the film is actually a pun. "Siekailu" means "hesitation" in Finnish. It's a pun on the similarity of the words "siekailu" (hesitation) and "seikkailu" (adventure). JIP | Talk 11:00, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:Pekka and Pätkä

message: I wonder if a more proper translation would be the one in the dictionary, which is "negro". "Neekeri" has acquired a derogatory connotation only recently (1990s to be exact), and even that is disputed. Besides, the movie "Pekka ja Pätkä Neekereinä" isn't (in my opinion) making fun of black people, rather, it makes fun of parochial Finns who gawp in wonder at two dimwits in blackface. So I'm editing it to dispense with the over-the-top racist term to put it into proper context. Ruo-kone 18:07, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neekeri = nigger? 

message: I would gladly accept an alternate translation for this title as Janitor is a bit misleading. Building manager sounds a bit off and he's not their landlord officially, I think.
Currently in the process of beefing up the Puupää series' articles. CaptainNtheGameMaster (talk) 10:15, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: "Janitor" Pikkarainen
Talk:Falcons (film)

message: Links that are related to actors performing in the film should be at their own article, not this one. The External link section should only be for links directly related to the film. --Steinninn 02:48, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  To many external links 
Talk:When the Raven Flies

message: Please don´t change the poster, unless you have a better version of this poster. A dvd cover is not recomended, and a poster for Revenge of the Barbarians can not be exepted. --Steinninn 11:21, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poster discussion 

message: We need to figure out wether we are going to use Guest, Gestur or Gäst. In the native tong of the film the name is Gestur, witch literally means Guest, but I don't see any reason to translate the meaning of the name. Just like you wouldn't translate Herr Bauer into Mr. Farmer. So what I'm suggesting is that we use Gestur. --Steinninn 22:32, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of Gestur
Talk:Screaming Masterpiece

message: The sentence "head Pagan of Iceland Hilmar Örn" doesn't make sense, and sounds a little absurd. I understand this might just be because of one's unfamiliarity with the religion. I'm changing it to goði of the Íslenska Ásatrúarfélagið. JanderVK (talk) 05:11, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hilmar Örn Hilmarsson
Talk:Dickson Greeting

message: I don't think there is any point in linking to this video on YouTube when we have the video here, on the article.  Yaris678 (talk) 22:43, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube link 

message: Even as an experiment, I can't imagine the original film would have been so short, and even the LOC's Youtube posting of it identifies it as a fragment. Is it known how long the film originally was? 70.72.211.35 (talk) 15:19, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original length?
Talk:The Impossible Voyage

message: Georges Méliès filmography's table, at line "660–661", has a link to The Impossible Voyage#Supplementary section. An  had this subsection. The subsection should be reinstated. Mateussf (talk) 14:54, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Supplementary
Talk:Onondaga Lake

message: Via Syracuse.com, for anyone who wants to add it in: http://www.syracuse.com/news/index.ssf/2015/06/whats_going_on_with_onondaga_lake_cleanup_now_that_dredging_is_over.html#incart_m-rpt-1  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.168.151.102 (talk) 18:23, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updated info on the cleanup operations 

message: I've been working on updating the Chemical pollution and Chemical pollution cleanup with more recent information. I updated the tenses in the Chemical pollution section to reflect the completion of the cleanup, as well as in the cleanup section. I also added more info on the cleanup, as the EPA has since released its first 5-year report. I've got a working draft in a sandbox, and here is a link to the diff describing all the changes. Can anyone weigh in and help me review it to ensure it's suitable for Wikipedia?--FacultiesIntact (talk) 21:19, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks good to me. Zero Serenity (talk - contributions) 19:01, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks for the feedback! I also discussed these edits with DASonnefeld, who supports them as well. Would you mind implementing these changes? I try to avoid making these edits myself given my COI.--FacultiesIntact (talk) 18:06, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the timely updates. Further comments, corrections, edits welcome. DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 09:10, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  More updates on cleanup 

message: The section on Museums would benefit from updating and expansion. The Skä•noñh Center – Great Law of Peace Center now is in operation. And an updated section could also include information about the two Visitor Centers: 
* Skä•noñh Center
* Griffin Visitor Center
* Honeywell Visitors Center
DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 09:24, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further updates needed (Museums) 

message: I wonder what the ideal scope of this article might be. There's almost enough material here to spin off one or two separate articles, e.g.: 
* History of Onondaga Lake
* Onondaga Lake cleanup
Comments, suggestions welcome. DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 09:31, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article scope? 

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Moneytrees🌴Talk🌲Help out at CCI!  03:12, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:Joan of Arc (1900 film)

message: I haven't seen this film (I'm not even sure a complete copy still exists), but I'm pretty sure the description is wrong. Melies didn't do many close-ups, whereas Dreyer's Passion of Joan of Arc uses them constantly.Tzunset (talk) 00:49, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment 
Talk:Humorous Phases of Funny Faces

message: I'm confused - is "Humorous Phases" the first animated film or not? The article states "In fact the first pictured movie was from Frenchman Émile Reynaud," but also "General consensus dictates that Humorous Phases is the earliest known example of animation of any kind." Is the "general consensus" phrase doing a "some people say?"  If there is ambiguity or debate over whether Humorous Phases is the first animated film, could that be explained a little?--Orkadelthia (talk) 13:51, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:When Knighthood Was in Flower (novel)

message: The 1908 version doesn't have enough information to warrant an infobox.  The 1922, however, should have a developed section as it doesn't have an article yet.  The 1953 version has it's own article. SkierRMH 01:11, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 1922 version
Talk:The Lad from Old Ireland

message: Is there any way of editing the actual title of this entry? The title of the film is The Lad from Old Ireland, rather than A Lad from Old Ireland... Bristol Irish (talk) 11:07, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur. IMDB has the name as A Lad..., but every other source I've seen including old advertisements for the film list it as The Lad.... I'll look into moving it. --Mikaka (talk) 21:13, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --Mikaka (talk) 21:30, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename
Talk:L'Inferno

message: The fact that this is one of the very few (possibly only) flims to portray Muhammad should be adressed in the article.Mk5384 (talk) 08:27, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Noted with reference. Deanlaw (talk) 21:38, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Depiction of Muhammad
Talk:In Nacht und Eis

message: Just wanted to point out that the film does not portray the events as daytime, as stated in the errors section. This is not only obvious from the title, but also from several scenes which it depicts taking place shortly before the collision, ie. "Evening entertainment in the Café Parisien" or "Evening toilet in a luxury cabin". During the sinking some portholes and windows of the Titanic model are even lit, clearly portraying a night scene. 
An additional error might be the scene of lifeboats picking up survivors, which unfortunately never happened as depicted in the film. Lifeboats (plural) never picked up passengers (likewise plural) during or after the disaster. Eventually one lifeboat was cleared and returned to the area, dragging a few people from the sea, but that's about it. Since this was one of the major criticisms raised towards survivors, it could be considered an error in the film. There's also nothing to substantiate Captain Smith saving someone from the sea, then swimming away from the boats in order to drown with his ship. Cute, for sure, but it never happened. 87.148.153.32 (talk) 18:54, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical Errors
Talk:Flesh Gordon

message: If you are going to have a criticism section you need negative criticism as well as positive criticism. Why did I even bother criticizing this page.-James Pandora Adams  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.176.152.59 (talk) 22:15, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism 
Talk:Sidney Mintz

message: --Francisco Valverde 22:50, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

message: Should not Mintz's work put in one section while references on another?
--Francisco Valverde 00:07, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Bibliography apart from Reference?

message: This article has a reference section but does not cite it's sources but lacks in-text citations. Bibliography is still mixed up with References.--Francisco Valverde 21:53, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs footnotes
Talk:The Patchwork Girl of Oz

message: Should this article have a warning about non-PC (racist) content, such as the article on JOHN DOUGH AND THE CHERUB has?  I'm thinking of the live-phonograph's song "Ah loves mah Lulu, mah coal-black Lulu, there ain't nobody else loves loo-loo, Lu!" which offends the protagonists extremely and will probably also offend PC-inclined readers.  There's no source, but the section in the article on JOHN DOUGH is also unsourced.  Please advise, SingingZombie (talk) 02:32, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: A "warning?" That would be editorializing. The fact could be mentioned, but should be cited. Just saying "some (who?) have found it offensive" isn't helpful. -Stellmach 11:49, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Non-PC
Talk:What Happened to Mary

message: I've removed the following from the article's lead:-
It should be noted that the title of the series was "What Happened to Mary" -- a statement, not a question; there was no question mark in the original title, and this error should be corrected in the title of this article.
For a start, statements such as this should not be put in the article. 
Secondly, I don't think it's true.  I do not have any reference books on hand at the moment but online sources all include the question mark: Silent Era, IMDb, All Movie (the latter of which uses both the question mark and non question mark version).  Additionally, one of the unique selling points (or gimmick, if you prefer) of the story was that the ending was unwritten.  The title is very litterally asking the audience for an answer, with a prize for the best version.
I have not reverted any of the question mark removals yet as I cannot be sure which is correct.  However, I will check with written sources as soon as I can and revert or move the article when I have done so. - AdamBMorgan (talk) 04:19, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Response: The question mark does NOT belong and should be removed from the title. All instances of use of it in the title which appear in books are incorrect. The serial is about "what happened" to its lead character, who does not go missing. A question mark does NOT appear on the main title of the film nor in either the play title nor the novelization which you can reference here: http://books.google.com/books?id=pTIhAAAAMAAJ&dq=what+happened+to+mary&printsec=frontcover&source=bl&ots=pMPDA94jpe&sig=ok9gTcRfg6yQ0NYNNBdWJC-0jBo&hl=en&ei=w5J7SoPoHoqBtwfY1-n4AQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=7#v=onepage&q=&f=false  The title simply sounds like a question but is a statement and the question mark error has just been copied and repeated over time. Another reference would be the issue of The Ladies' World where the story first appeared.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by ClarkSavageJr (talk • contribs) 02:40, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Again, there was no question mark in the title of this film, nor was there one on the title of the original play or novel related to it. Regardless of what appears in erroneous articles on the net and off, the title was simply What Happened to Mary, a statement describing the action portrayed and not a question. Here is the title page of the original novel which shows NO question mark. Please correct the title of this article and remove the question mark! http://books.google.com/books?id=pTIhAAAAMAAJ&pg=PP25&source=gbs_selected_pages&cad=3#v=onepage&q&f=false  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ClarkSavageJr (talk • contribs) 07:55, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added a scan of an actual frame of a title card from the original film. There's no question mark in the title. Please remove it from the title of this article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ClarkSavageJr (talk • contribs) 09:45, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  The question mark
Talk:The Golem (1915 film)

message: I suggest to merge all this page into the main Golem (disambiguation) page.
All contents of this page are already included there.
...then let's make this one a redirect to Golem (disambiguation)#In_films. --Franta Oashi (talk) 13:51, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge to 

message: I am not sure why this page still lists this film as 'lost'.  The internet film archive has had a print of it available for free download (PD) for a couple of years now and several satellite "community" channels have aired it (which is where I first saw it).   Will be adding this link to the main page as well.  The IA incorrectly lists the date of production as 1920, but this is the original 1915 film (rt: 101 mins). 
https://archive.org/details/TheGolem_893
Posthocergopropterhoc (talk) 03:53, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The print available is not of the 1915 film. It is of the 1920 prequel.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.145.220.11 (talk) 02:49, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:   Not Lost