lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Jay Leonhart

message: Hi Jay leonhart here.
I am a jazz bassist, have been all my life. I saw my name under jazz bass players and put my bio in from my website jayleonhart.com.  Now I find I I have been speedily deleted, to my dismay. I just wanted to give the encyclopedia a little genuine information. But no, now I'm speedily deleted.
Jay leonhart
:According to the logs, the contents of the page were basically identical to what's located at http://www.jayleonhart.com/bio.html. At the bottom of that webpage is: "© 2006 Jay Leonhart". Wikipedia has no legal right to carry someone else's copyrighted material, and is required to delete it. You can review the policy and procedures at Wikipedia:Copyrights. -- Fan-1967 03:12, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: That actually WAS Jay Leonhart that added the entry...the copyright holder and bassist - I had no idea that he had done so before I created a page for him, and the prior discussion magically reappeared. I have sent him a note about his page being restored - all the material here now is from my own knowledge, other sources, and modified versions of his press (not copyrighted) materials - thanks.  Tvccs 04:46, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dear friends... 

message: I am just wondering why a photo of Barbara Carroll appears on Jay Leonhart's website. I am not that experienced, otherwise I would delete it, but hope somebody else might do so. 
If you want to you can find photos of Jay here: https://www.jayleonhart.com/epk#EPKGallery
Since he has aparently been on this wikipedia page himself, you may contact him with the instructions to upload one of his own photos. Hskoppek (talk) 18:14, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo of Barbara Carroll
Talk:Henty River

message: Somebody resize the image please! --Geobeedude 03:09, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Please note Zeehan is not a city in any sense of the word! and queenstown is closer - just look at a map! SatuSuro 15:27, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Blowpipe (missile)

message: Hi to whom it may concern I served with 119 AD battery in Chatham NB in the early 90s and we had an exercise in Wainwright AB and I was one of the lucky o WA to get to fire the blowpipe and I ended up having two hits that week and received 2 medals from shorts and my question is I now believe g to the veterans NATO/UN club and wanted to get a cloth badge of the medals I've won thought shorts please let me k of what we cab do thank you for your valuable to time my name is Joseph Claude Alex Alain garneau  Jcaagarneau (talk) 16:51, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Medals 

message: This article quotes extensively from this article written by the anonymous writer "blacktail".  This seems to be raising a lot of red flags; anonymous author, unverifiable expertise.  On the face of it, precisely the type of source we shouldn't be using.  Raised at WP:RSN WP:RSN#Military Today.  WCMemail 01:23, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed it as a source, RSN indicated it wasn't reliable. WCMemail 13:01, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Military Today
Talk:Big Girls Don't Cry... They Get Even

message: Now I'm confused. When I saw the trailer for this with theatrical release of Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles II: The Secret of the Ooze. It went under the title Stepkids and lead me to believe that a film by that title excisted in New Line's library. So when I saw a VHS the film under this name, I emediatly thought that Stepkids got a sequel. But after see this article earlier today I'm a little confused. The aformentioned trailer depicted a different story than what would become the final film. As all the members of this disfunctinal family was getting together for a rare family outing of some kind, the siblings don't, as step siblings don't. All while presented from Laura's point of view. So how does the Stepkids title play into the film? Was it a working title, was it an alternate title for other regions, or what? Sarujo (talk) 00:48, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The NYT is taking All Movie Guide's word that Stepkids was an alternate title, but neither explains where or when it was used.71.200.138.188 (talk) 12:31, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title ''Stepkids''
Talk:Sea Eagle (missile)

message: Quote of Dave1185  "we don't do comparison here on Wikipedia lest we risk becoming a bazaar for arms dealer to compare their goods :)"
I agree that wikipedia should NOT be a barter-place for haggling arms-manufacturers, however I do feel that linking to weapons of similar generations/capabilities does benefit the reader in search of information, especially the ones who is not an expert.
/BP 78.70.77.35 (talk) 02:11, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Constructive criticism: This article contains way too much information.  No missile (many superior to this particular entry), contain as many words!  Who cares about the minutia concerning the gestation of this particular missile? It is a very long and boring article. Why?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.157.255.184 (talk) 23:29, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Comparable missiles

message: Ok - the Operators section lists nations and aircraft known to be capable to carry the missile. For the UK all aircraft listed are marked as retired aircraft.So what is the missile status with the UK MoD? Same Comment to Saudi Arabia. Users/ status of missile in previous sections fails to mention this. Is the UK or Saudi Arabia making integration efforts for missile to go onto newer Aircraft. Wfoj3 (talk) 14:46, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sea Eagle Missile Status
Talk:The Game (Stargate Atlantis)

message: The game Sheppard and McKay play is more like Populous game (wich was one of the first game with this concept) and less like the Sims. So I changed the information. Heinrich k 11:20, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Populous conta Sims 
Talk:Shuizhu

message: The claim that no water is involved in making this dish is wrong. The most important step of this dish is actually indicated by its name - boiled with water. Both meat and vegetable used in the dish should be boiled briefly, just enough to be not raw. This is to keep the tenderness of the meat, which is one of the most important characteristic of this dish. However, when it's served you would not see water, instead it's totally oil covered. - munford 03:27, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

message: Is this actually true?  I have eaten this dish many times in restaurants and it is always served with a large amount of red broth.  According to this: http://appetiteforchina.com/recipes/sichuan-boiled-beef-fiery-sauce/ It appears that the waterless version is for those who cant handle the heat of the fiery red broth.  Anyone know a good source for one way or the other? 74.72.135.100 (talk) 04:32, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Water in final dish?
Talk:Metal Wolf Chaos

message: Now I know the lines in MWCCCCCCCCCCCC are corny but they ARE NOT  engrish. Engrish is described as a misprnouciation of english granmaticals via Asian incobatbility. MWC uses 100% proper english, even that perforated cheese bit.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.178.36.182 (talk) 02:53, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Engrish

message: I know that the instructions for accessing the game falls under 'What Wikipedia Is Not', BUT, they are essential in helping the reader actually PLAY the game, as whoever reads this article will (generally) be in an english-speaking country (where the only way to play the game, is by having this particular demo disc).  Also, this is the only legal way to play the game in an english-speaking country, as modded consoles are illegal (and it's not easy to import a console).
Having said this, please do not delete the instructions, though formatting them to be less intrusive is fine.  I would also ask that anyone who reads this and sees no such instructions in the article (they're a list of button combos), to please try and revert to a version with them (or contact me).  --Dante 21:24, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Instructions 

message: In regards to User:Peptuck's editing, any further deletions of the instructions mentioned above will be considered vandalism.  If you're not willing to take 5 seconds to check a talk page before making a major deletion, you'd might as well get off Wikipedia.  And "Wikpedia is not a friggin' game guide" is hardly justification compared to the two paragraphs you see above, and hardly shows goodwill.  If you wish to delete the instructions under WP:IS NOT, then TALK about it first.  If outvoted, I would gladly delete the text in question myself, but so far it's been arbitrarily cast aside by one random user, giving a single sentence fragment as justification.--Dante 03:12, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing 

message: I read the notice about (a) Michael Wilson being in Ninja Blade.  Now it's not that I think it's incorrect, but are you sure that these Michael Wilsons are just name related and not blood related?  Because I have a hard time believing that Michael Wilson from MWC, and Michael Wilson from Ninja Blade, are son and father respectively.  Both of their personalities, as well as motives, are completely different.  Neo Guyver (talk) 15:22, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are you sure?
Talk:Haplology

message: Does this really belong?  I don't think there are any kinds of earrings besides pierced-ear ones, and I've never heard the phrase 'pierced earrings' at all.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.245.223.207 (talk) 06:03, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: 5000+ GHits and cited; 910000 for "pierced earrings". You'll need a stronger argument if you want it remoov'd. --Trɔpʏliʊm • blah 09:24, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Pierced-ear Earrings

message: More examples would be helpful. E.g. would February, pronounced as Febry, qualify as haplological? --Singkong2005 talk 03:33, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree – more examples would be beneficial to the article. I will add some today. As for "February", the omission of the first "r" from it is a different phenomenon from haplology. I forget the exact name of it, but it was discussed on a radio program I tuned into last week. --GentlemanGhost (talk) 19:12, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Add examples - e.g. February?

message: The Dutch example (kunststof -> kunstof) was not haplology, as only part of a syllable (or two) is removed (kunst-stof -> kun-stof / kuns-tof). Jalwikip 14:10, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed Dutch example 

message: Mediality doesn't seem to bear on the possibility of a haplologisable situation at all.  Moreover it's false for the cited examples -- if syllables affected by haplology had to both be medial it couldn't run on shorter than a four-syllable input, but we've got several three-syllable example inputs.  So I'm removing that condition.  4pq1injbok (talk) 19:41, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why demand that the syllables be medial? 

message: While mineralogy (and similar examples in -logy) certainly qualify as examples, does econometrics too? After all, it seems to stand for expected economometrics.
(Interestingly, non-standard mineralology, philogy and economometrics all yield a large number of Google hits, by far not only in badly redacted texts ...) --Florian Blaschke (talk) 18:21, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Econometrics? 

message: I came here wanting to know what the word is (assuming there is one) for a word that has undergone haplology. For example, how would one fill in the blank in "gently is a ____"? This page was unhelpful in this regard. ExcarnateSojourner (talk) 20:37, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Linguists would usually say "This form has undergone haplology", or similar... AnonMoos (talk) 08:04, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Term for a word having undergone haplology
Talk:BROACH warhead

message: Doesn't like the date, thinks it's too early, from what I can tell. It's the correct date though. Fitzhugh (talk) 02:55, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  It's complaining about archivedate on what is currently reference 4
Talk:Lawrence Kestenbaum

message: My recent tagging for notability was reverted. I reinstated it because I have concerns regarding WP:NPOLITICIAN and WP:BLP1E. I note that the previously withdrawn  AfD mooted a possible merge but the discussion never happened. Is that the way we should be going? - Sitush (talk) 07:58, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Edmonds College

message: this talks about all the great things there, and it looks like it came from a brochure.
Indeed. I'll try to clean it up if I can find time. Xen0phile 20:10, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: As mentioned before this is exactly like a brochure... Likely the administration or faculty made this page... I as a student of this "institution" know that it has some serious issues that go unaddressed and are often buried and whitewashed including but not limited to, "corruption, waste of money, overcrowding, outdated equipment, discrimination, and staff/administration"... A simple Google search will reveal that they flood several thousand of files from their own web page and publications to make objective information on them hard to find... I feel there should be a complete and objective set of sourced information on them in this article and including a criticism section, and not just some unsourced piece written by the entity itself. Vipercat (talk) 09:28, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of information and objectivity of information... 

message: This article is within the scope of WikiProject Washington also. (Keithbaker (talk) 02:44, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject 
Talk:Red Top (missile)

message: Very short, but quite possibly all there is to say on the subject. Please expand where possible. LordAmeth 08:41, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: WP:MILHIST Assessment

message: In Lightning Boys, I read that the Red Top was colloquially known as the "Red Flop" by pilots, and couldn't be launched when the aircraft was flying at supersonic speeds. Can anyone verify this? If true, it would explain the retention of Firestreak and be a useful (I think) addition to the article. 66.17.190.132 (talk) 16:35, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: If true, possibly only true in referring to the small-finned variants of the Lightning, the larger fin of the F.6 was specifically introduced to counter the increased side area of Red Top when carried. IIRC, the larger wing and fin area of Red Top ahead of the Lightning's CofG had a destabilising effect in yaw at supersonic speeds, hence the enlarged fin on later F.3 and F.6 Lightnings.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.148.221.26 (talk) 17:03, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subsonic usage only? 

message: I not exactly sure what this means:
It seems to be saying that Fozard thought the P.1127 had radar and a larger engine, and thus would be capable of carrying two Red Tops. Can this be clarified or expanded upon? Thanks. - BilCat (talk) 02:07, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unclear meaning
Talk:Henry M. Jackson High School

message: does this page really need to be move-protected? it was edit vandalism that caused the protect in the first place. I see NawlinWiki indef sysop move-protected it, i don't think he actually intended that, but his tools might still be set to do so from back in the Grawp days. it's not that I actually think it should be moved, i don't even have account on the pedia, but someone somewhere down the road might suggest adding "Mill Creek" or "Washington" or taking off "Henry M." or something, and I want to make sure pre-emptive protects don't ruin the free editing spirit. 71.113.26.205 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 04:36, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: You got to love that school. Screw all you guys who think were "stuck up"
This school is known to host rich stuck up kids. Its true. And we love it.
Everyone is just insanely jealous. Sorry!
Im out
≤Jessikuhh≥ —The preceding unsigned comment was added by XurXcuteX (talk • contribs) 16:00, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jackson High 

message: Do you think the people whose names you put up WANT their names up? This article really doesn't have the quality of the articles of other schools. The whole cross country section is confusing and reads like someone mentioned in it wrote it. Also the baseball part deserves its own section if the cross country does, and shouldn't be in school information.
Kli89 21:15, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Privacy? 

message: Can someone add information about sports/athletics, and write it in quality style?  Also, is the cleanup tag still necessary?  It seems a lot of the stylistic issues have been resolved, but I could be wrong.Tfosorcim (talk) 18:22, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improvements
Talk:Destiny: A Chronicle of Deaths Foretold

message: Does this actually exist anywhere at any time ever? I've never found it, even online. I'm not even that interested in reading it aside from its elusiveness...
:Absolutely. Check out the links and references I have added. It was even nominated for an Eisner. -- Guybrush (talk) 01:34, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Does it exist?
Talk:Seventeen-article constitution

message: Should this not be at "Seventeen-Article Constitution" or "Jūshichijō kenpō"? As it stands, it sounds too generic, and would not be interpreted as the title of a document, merely a descriptor that could apply to any constitution in all of history that happened to have had seventeen articles. LordAmeth 03:44, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Page name

message: There is a NPOV dispute going on at Talk:Constitution, there is one editor who has declared himself to be an "expert" and has declared that there are "Principles of Successful Constitutions" without stating explicitly what the principles are, he is trying to write that they must come from Aristotle, Plato, and John Mason or else they "don't count" as successful Constitutions.  I responded that this was highly POV and gave a number of counter examples including this one, but by Circular logic, he argues that my examples don't count as "successful" because they didn;t come from Aristotle, Plato, and John Mason, therefore they cannot possibly be regarded as "successful".  Please share your comments. ፈቃደ (ውይይት) 13:40, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As Socrates said, none can be forced to understand. --TokyoJapan (talk) 06:49, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  RFC dispute at [[Constitution]] 

message: What is the "dictatorial" component referenced in the last sentence?
201.242.100.181 (talk) 03:23, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Dictatorial?

message: Wasn't it more of a document with a Confucian framework that emphasised Buddhist values in addition to Confucian ones? Because, if Japan was undergoing centralisation, who'd have the best model to draw on? Hint: To the west. - Imperator Talk 17:56, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Buddhist document? 
Talk:National Centre of Scientific Research "Demokritos"

message: Do we have to have the title in capitals with the "'s (clost the word for a sec)? I am a bit too green here, my knowledge of the style manual is minimal.HichamVanborm 03:44, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hicham, if you look at the History page on their official website at History page, you will see that the title of this article is exactly how their name is given there. Please don't change the title until there has been ample discussion here (4 or 5 people at least) or until someone actually living in Greece will give his/her authoritative opinion. Thanks, - mbeychok 04:29, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Commment - I have created National Centre of Scientific Research and NCSR as redirects, pending consensus on the name. However, Demokritos redirects to Democritus, so we might consider creating a dab page, if the name stays. FingersOnRoids♫ 01:23, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Province of Valencia

message: Hello everyone, there is a current need to help disambiguate the term Valencia.  At Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links, Valencia is one of the disambiguation pages with the most links, and ideally there should be no links to disambiguation pages.  So if possible, please take a look at the  links, and disambiguate to a more correct location.  Thanks, -- Jeff3000 03:46, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Help disambiguating
Category talk:Educational organizations

message: This category seems to be isolated from the :category:education, 
which is mainly concerned with pre-university level topics. 
Perhaps we need a category for bringing higher education - research - libraries and the like in one place. DGG 03:48, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This category is now under :Category:Education and includes libraries. There are also :Category:Academia and above that :Category:Research. -- Beland (talk) 15:40, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Scope
Talk:Criticism of the FBI Method of Classification of Serial Murderers

message: After going through and footnoting all of the sources, there was one that I didn't want to touch. The (Woodworth & Porter, 2002) citation is still in there, because in the original reference (which is now included in the References section), the copyright date is 2001, not 2002, as it says in the parenthetical citation.  
Can the author of this article confirm that these two sources are the same? Thanks. John Pouliot 00:56, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last citation question 

message: Isn't this article a POV fork of FBI method of profiling? Shouldn't the content just be included in that article instead, and this one deleted? BuddingJournalist 05:46, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yea, that sounds right.John Pouliot 15:44, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Both articles sorely need rewrites as well.John Pouliot 22:18, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I went ahead and did the merge, and added a prod proposal to this one. All content is now under a "Criticism" section. But you're right, it definitely needs a complete overhaul. Should this talk page be merged too, to preserve its contents? BuddingJournalist 07:18, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

text: I added this talk page to FBI method of profiling, but we'll wait until the article is deleted to delete this too.John Pouliot 15:47, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge and POV Fork
Talk:Miss New Hampshire USA

message: Grace Knox hometown Westport NY 2600:1000:B152:7E8A:E043:9B96:6C0:2265 (talk) 03:26, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. RudolfRed (talk) 04:52, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 7 July 2022
Talk:Zachariah (film)

message: Country Joe don't know nothin'. It's a great movie.  Das Baz, aka Erudil 18:26, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In the opening credits of the film, all four members of the Firesign Theatre are listed as writers, yet in this article, only Austin and Bergman are credited. Is there a source which supports this, or is it merely an oversight? SkookumDog (talk) 14:19, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Writing credits for Firesign Theatre: Austin and Bergman, or all four?
Talk:Luis Marden

message: This page could use a picture of Mr. Marden. However, there are VERY few online. Plus, we couldn't get one without copyright infringement I imagine. Anyone know where to find any photos suitable? God knows this man deserves it.
Thanks for uploading the photo of Luis Marden, but I'm not sure that a photo from National Geographic can be tagged under the GFDL license.  --Polylerus 07:00, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It is paradoxical how an important photographer, member of National Geographic for 6 decades, does not have a photo of himself published on the Web. Neither on Google nor here in Wikipedia you are able to find one. Please, get one and publish it here. I want to see him for a first time!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.153.226.170 (talk) 04:04, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Luis Marden's Photograph 