Talk:Camulodunum

message: Who calls it Camulodumum (with an 'm' rather than an 'n')? I've never heard that before. Citation please!
-- Tom Anderson 2007-05-08 18:03 +0100 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 128.40.81.27 (talk) 17:04, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Camulodumum? 

message: The fact that this is almost certainly the source of the name 
"Camelot" seem to beg mention here. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont]  ‹(-¿-)› 06:44, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Find a source and put it in the article. Nev1 (talk) 16:14, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

text: Added a section on it. Probably needs citation but I struggle to find exact sources, the link to Camelot is all just speculative anyway. Common and notable enough to justify a section though, I believe. Twelvetoner (talk) 21:19, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Camelot

message: Hello. I've rewritten much of the article, complete with references, over the past few days to try and give more info on the town during its high point and flesh out its history. For such an important part of Britain's Roman past, the old article was very scanty and seemed to imply that the town ended with Boudica, and then turned into Camelot...
Please add more info if you can and more pictures!
Razumukhin (talk) 21:16, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite 

message: This major find surely needs a mention: http://www.thecolchesterarchaeologist.co.uk/?p=14844 John a s (talk) 23:13, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added a little bit to the Boudican destruction layer section. Please feel free to add more! Razumukhin (talk) 17:53, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fenwick treasure 

message: In the "walls" section you mention that a venus statuette was found in 1872-73 that may have been part of the temples. Was it by any chance THIS statuette found in 1870, and now at the British Museum? 
http://www.britishmuseum.org/research/collection_online/collection_object_details.aspx?objectId=1394346&partId=1&searchText=diadem&images=true&object=20526&subject=54324&page=1  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Florimell1919 (talk • contribs) 06:36, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  Hi, yep that's the one! Razumukhin (talk) 11:30, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: venus statue?

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Camulodunum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140603222036/http://www.roman-britain.org/places/colchester_temples.htm to http://www.roman-britain.org/places/colchester_temples.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:35, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Camulodunum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150924114318/http://www.roman-britain.org/places/stanway.htm to http://www.roman-britain.org/places/stanway.htm
*Added  tag to http://www.cat.essex.ac.uk/reports/CAR-report-0008
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:32, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The coin image entitled 'Coin of the Trinovantes minted at Camulodunon' may have an incomplete and potentially misleading caption. The coin bears the letters CVN which is the usual shorthand for King Cunobelin. This, in turn, means that the coin would not belong to the early Trinovantes period of Camulodunon (25-10 BC) as appears implied by the article text at this point, but to Cunobelin's reign (c. AD 9-40). A numismatist should check this out, and if necessary, clarify it with an unambiguous caption. Klumpenburg (talk) 18:00, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coin pictures 

message: jhjhfee Troopersho (talk) 17:37, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate Iron age article