lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Battle Royale (manga)

message: Where can I find the Wikipedia page on the characters in the manga version of Battle Royale?
:Just created one. Monsieurxander 14:59, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Little help here... 

message: The current version of the article claims both, but I figure it is actually not literal at all.  Some fixing is in order, I guess. Luis Dantas 00:12, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Just did it.  I wonder why even try to make BR a reality-show story; what a poor choice, what a poor fit.  Then again, Giffen is well known for being a satire comicbook writer as opposed to a writer of serious pieces; one wonders why he was ever chosen to BR (and for that matter, Suicide Squad and Defenders as well). Luis Dantas 13:59, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, Battle Royale was somewhat of a satire too (of shows like the one with Kinpachi Sakamoto - The author did throw in references to that show in the novel) - But it also had its serious side. WhisperToMe (talk) 18:44, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is Giffen's version literal, loose or both? 

message: The original Battle Royale manga, Blitz Royale, and Angels' Border are all different series. Should they really be grouped under the same page like this? And Angels' Border is kind of a special case; it's the only one of the manga series that takes place within the universe of the original novel. 71.35.173.147 (talk) 18:56, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Article separation?
Template talk:User slackware

message: Not sure how to change the colour of a link, but the blue is unreadable against the black for a colour blind user, such as myself. Pauric 23:31, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You can't - you'll have to change the background colour. I liked my old colour scheme better, myself. Ah, well. Lord Bob 17:21, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

text: None occurs to me, especially since Template:User linux is now also yellow-on-yellow. I shall set the colours back right now. Lord Bob 17:31, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:James MacGregor Burns

message: I believe he was the author, or one of the authors, of the 77th Division WW2 history Ours to Hold It High as part of the aforementioned history section of that division and relied on in its Wikipedia page. 70.108.27.212 (talk) 21:41, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  ours to hold it high
Talk:Kareela

message: 'seems to have been chosen' - changed to 'was'. reason: either it was or wasn't. if we're not sure, then don't mention it (no room for speculation here). if it was, then say it was. 
deleted 'vast': i'm perfectly happy to state that the shopping centre isn't 'vast'. it's a suburban shopping centre of nowhere near the size of say, the nearby miranda westfield, which is much more accurately described as vast.
'They also have a' to 'There is also a': i prefer the wording. so shoot me.
'Practise' to 'Practice': that's how it's spelt. see [Family Practice]. - Dibo 23:31, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  my edits 
Talk:Por

message: I propose the merging of the disambiguation page Por into the disambiguation page POR—or vice-versa—due to the fact that the title of the latter page is merely a capitalization of that of the former, and thus the two should merge into a single disambiguation page for the three-letter disambiguation title (with one page ultimately redirecting to the other), rather than confusingly being split into two short disambiguation pages of virtually the same topic as they currently remain. In addition, many of the articles listed on each page are better suited for the other, leading to further inconsistency and confusion. This problem must be resolved as soon as possible. — |J~Pæst|  02:53, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Lists of Hindi films

message: I am deeply sorry to say that any effort put on this list is a waste of resource. Now a days the number of movies being made is really huge. To the best of my knowlegde, the ballot of Filmfare is around 180 movies in the last few years.
Even if you take the average as follows
25  for 1950-1970 = 500
50  for 1971-1990 = 1000 
100 for 1990-2000 = 1000
150 for 2000-2006 = 900
A total of 3400 movies. This is a huge underestimation of the number when compared to 7778 titles listed by IMDb.com.
If with gigantic effort, this list is somehow made close to completion, what good will it do? People will still check IMDb for details.
I thereby propose deletion of this list.
PS: I wrote this and was not logged in on WP. Editing my signature.
Vivek 05:02, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Purpose 

message: Hi,
I've been using MMA for about 6 months with no issues. Since last week when my Android smartphone installed the newest version of MMA, I am experiencing strange problems with the audio not playing when initiating a playlist and the using the forward button.I'm running Android 6.0.1 Marshmallow. Here's a list of the issues I am having since the last MMA update. I'm curious if anyone is experiencing similar?
Please help.
I didn't find the right solution from the Internet.
References:-
https://www.mediamonkey.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=21&t=87386
Blockchain Application Examples
Thanks  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davefollmer (talk • contribs) 05:04, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Forward button issues with new MMA 1.3.0.0682 

message: Kgf chapter 2 रिलीज Date 2402:8100:30AC:61D0:1:0:13BF:59E3 (talk) 16:00, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kgf chapter 2
Talk:Iowa District East of the Lutheran Church – Missouri Synod

message: I am removing the extended list of congregations & missions.  I certainly see the value of an article on a middle judicatory for a major american denomination, but not for the directory style list. Athanasius • Quicumque vult  18:47, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:NOTDIR]] 

message: This seems to be the only LCMS district article which lists all of its schools.  For uniformity, should this section be deleted from this article, or should a school section be added to all of the other district pages?  --Dulcimerist (talk) 21:01, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I confirmed that no other LCMS disrict articles include a Schools section, so I went ahead and deleted it for uniformity.  This was likely the intent of the 17 May 2009 edit described above.  --Dulcimerist (talk) 21:20, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Schools 
Talk:Battle Royale II: Blitz Royale

message: Someone needs to fill in the plot section, and list where to buy.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.105.228.162 (talk) 02:53, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot and where to buy 

message: I have no idea what that is. I'm sure I'm not alone. Doesn't help that it links out to a wiki page that doesn't exist. Would someone who knows what the English equivalent, or even just a rough translation maybe put it next to it in parentheses?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.246.249.112 (talk) 15:12, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gensaku.
Talk:Flags depicting the Southern Cross

message: The stars on the flag of the Solomon Islands are supposed to represent the five main islands and not the southern cross. "The blue section represents the water of the Pacific Ocean; while the yellow stripe symbolizes the sunshine and the green section stands for the fertility of the nation. Originally, the five stars represented the five administrative districts at the time of Solomon Island's independence. When the number of districts in the country increased the meaning of the stars was then said to represent the five main groups of islands groups that form the Solomon Islands." worldflags101.com --neon white talk 16:11, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Solomon Islands 

message: They also feature a southern cross The truest repairman3 (talk) 17:28, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: If it's not an official flag, we can't list it. The islands apparently have no organized local government or permanent population, so it's doubtful it has an official flag. If it does have a flag approved by the NZ government, then we'd need a reliable source for it, not to mention an svg file depicting the flag, and a suitable image license. BilCat (talk) 20:32, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kermadec islands 
Talk:Economic production quantity

message: Why on earth does this page use F for (H)olding cost and K for (S)etup costs? Nobody uses this terminology.
115.64.228.228 (talk) 10:53, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Complaint

message: role of economic system 41.114.223.95 (talk) 17:16, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Economic management science 

message: 0735259523 41.114.223.95 (talk) 17:18, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Economic management science
Talk:Flag of Arizona

message: I don't want to be the one to edit this page, but I believe the 13 rays of red and gold represent the original US colonies, not the original Arizona counties.  Arizona Territory was created with an original 4 counties and by the time it became a state it had 14 counties.  The External link on this page (Arizona flag history) says "13 colonies."  The second reference "Flags of the World" on this page says "13 states."   I can find no references online that supports the "13 colonies" phrase.
Lowellh (talk) 07:48, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  13 rays of red and gold 

message: Just to mention it the Thomas Cambell you added there is the wrong one. The one you want is Thomas Edward Cambell, not Thomas Jefferson Cambell. Maybe I will get around to changing that. I thought I would mention that in case I didn't fix that.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Craighank (talk • contribs) 18:35, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thomas Cambell
Talk:Everything! (Tones on Tail album)

message: This article is about a compilation album.  It's misleading to include quotes in a Reception section from an article written 14 years before the compilation existed.  Gab4gab (talk) 20:41, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. I've removed the reviews: if they belong anywhere, it's on the band's Wikipedia page rather than here. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 12:17, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception
Talk:Polish Legions

message: According to Urbankowski, the first Polish legion was 'Legion Potockiego' dormed by Joachim Potocki during Bar Confederation times, but there is practically no information about this online, and I'd like to verify it with some other source before adding it to the list.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  21:43, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Flag of Kansas

message: According to the NAVA website, Kansas has an officially-sanctioned (though rarely used) alternative to its standard flag.  Can anyone find corroborating evidence for this?  Here's the link to the webpage.  --Xyzzyva 00:06, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kansas State Banner 
Talk:Flag of Shetland

message: Just thought I'd point out that there was a guy with this flag at T in the park this year.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.153.138.27 (talk) 22:23, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Shepherd School of Music

message: For some reason, User:Dajooliyardskool insists on changing the mention of how many graduate students are accepted to a fixed 10%, despite the fact that page linked in the citation for the figure continues to use 10-15%. Just editing it on Wikipedia doesn't make it so. OmarGosh (talk) 21:20, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grad student acceptance rate
Talk:Gallic rooster

message: .  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.111.203.9 (talk) 06:50, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: I've always heard it called the "Gallic cock", such as is referred to by the article on Postage stamps and postal history of Algeria and in the Stanley Gibbons stamp catalogue. I think there should be a redirect from "Gallic cock" to "Gallic rooster" (or vice versa), but I have no idea how to set that up. Raichu2 (talk) 02:51, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about "Gallic cock"? 

message: > The Gallic rooster (French: le coq gaulois) is an unofficial national symbol of France
The gallic rooster was featured in very large size on the post-1906 design french 20 gold franc coins, which was official issue of the republic. Many dozens of millions were minted, as part of the Latin Monetary Union. That makes it official. 87.97.103.4 (talk) 09:11, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unofficial? 

message: It's as if the Walloons see themselves as an offshoot of France. So cringeworthy and NWO.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.0.183.116 (talk) 01:37, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs background on why the rooster should also be a symbol of Wallonia
Talk:Royal Standard of Norway

message: The existence of this flag has so far not been confirmed, but it is likely that the kings of Sweden and Norway flew a standard based on the union war flag with the royal arms. However, the proportions must be correct. In the war flag introduced by royal decree on 7 March 1815, the rectangles on the hoist side were squares, unlike those in Swedish flags after 1844. The "Norwegian" canton in the union flags of 1815 and 1818 was always a square. 
This fact is confirmed in the recent book by one of the foremost Scandinavian vexillogists, Jan Henrik Munksgaard. See pages 67-83 and 119 in: Munksgaard, Jan Henrik (2012): Flagget − Et nasjonalt symbol blir til. Kristiansand, Vest-Agder-museet. . 
I would greatly appreciate the help of anyone who is able to make SVG versions of this flag with correct proportions. Lacking the necessary skills, I made a makeshift PNG-version to replace the incorrect flag that was used in several articles. Roede (talk) 21:36, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: When there is a problem with an SVG file on Commons, you should go there and ask for it to be corrected, and wait for that process to be done. You shouldn't upload "makeshift PNGs" and edit war to force them on articles as a replacement until the SVG is changed, that's highly disruptive and needs to stop. Have some patience. Fry1989 eh?  19:08, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It is a lot more disruptive to create unhistorical flag images. Help to improve Wikipedia by making correct SVG files. Roede (talk) 20:26, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: No it's not that's absolute nonsense. If there is a problem with a file on Commons, fix the file. It may take an hour, it make take a few days, but nobody's gonna die waiting for the correction. Uploading a temporary substitution in an inferior format is absolutely unnecessary and disruptive. Fry1989 eh?  21:34, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Royal standard 1815−1844 
Talk:Flag of Montana

message: Hi, just to let you know that there is an effort underway on Montana to change the current state flag.
Big Sky Flag
Wolfdog406 (talk) 02:28, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Talk of a new flag? 
Talk:Flag of Nevada

message: The description of the flag in the first paragraph of the article reflects the old, pre-1991 flag rather than the current one. I could probably rewrite the description myself if it were not after 1:00 a.m. here as I write this; perhaps after a night's sleep I'll tackle it (if I can remember in the morning.) ak4mc (talk) 05:05, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

message: I'm surprised nobody cares for the flag that was nearly adopted in 1953 but was veto'd by the governor. 
--Thegunkid (talk) 07:07, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed flag of 1953
Talk:James Thomson (cell biologist)

message: This article needs a lot of work: there are a lot of run on sentences and other mistakes in sentence structure, I think the article could use a re-organization, and the article is heavily overlinked. Daniel J Simanek (talk) 10:10, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup-rewrite tag 
Talk:Flag of Åland

message: Uh, is the phrase "Swedish flag defaced by a red cross" the right phrase to use? "Defaced" doenst appear to be a flag term, but some sort of vandalism?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by FootballChaos (talk • contribs) 07:33, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: In vexillology, "defaced by X" is just the right phrase to use, meaning "with X placed on it". Outside vexillology, however, the phrase has vandalistic connotations. --Palnatoke (talk) 07:53, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This over-tagged little article could probably be improved if a Swedish-speaker would check the sources cited in the SV and FI articles. Also 'Flags of the World' cites:
Erik Tudeer and Lars-Øyvind Liljestrom: Ålands flagga, Mariehamn: Nordens Institut på Åland, 1994, ISBN: 952-90-5534-X
Davidships (talk) 13:47, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations 

message: It would seem that we are in a bit of a pickle as people keep changing and reverting edits just over the word Inofficial/Unofficial. Believe it or not but both of them are proper english words here are their dictonary pages: 
Inofficial: https://www.thefreedictionary.com/Inofficial
Unofficial: https://www.thefreedictionary.com/unofficial
can we just pick one and stick to it?
Scu ba (talk) 21:30, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inofficial vs Unofficial
Talk:Flag of South Dakota

message: User Zscout370 has stripped all useful information about the South Dakota Seal contained in the flag from this article. (MandyBarberio 15:23, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: September 2007

message: Hey so I recently found this source on the Internet Archiven which is a collection of flags from National Geographic from 1934 that includes the flags of the states of the US. It includes the old flag of South Dakota but with some differences, including having "wavy" rays off of the sun, a darker yellow colour, and a golden border. Is this something that would be worth adding to the image or is this simply a variant of the flag? 2604:3D09:F80:1A00:BCBB:6471:5313:2176 (talk) 20:26, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I have found another source from the 1960s with the same flag appearance. 2604:3D09:F80:1A00:BCBB:6471:5313:2176 (talk) 20:41, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Funny you mention this! I am currently expanding this article. I will look into it and try to figure out if there is a way to work this into the article. Thank you, this is very useful! – TCMemoire 18:53, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  1909-1963 flag
Talk:Flag of Washington

message: We have :commons:Category:Flags of Washington (state). Should there be a subcategory specifically for the flag of Washington, and not just one for flags of Washington? Would be nice to separate the official state flag from other flags associated with the state. ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:04, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commons? 

message: I removed the reference to the NAVA survey, which has been added back twice. The problem with the NAVA survey is that it is neither a reliable primary nor secondary source. The survey is not a reliable primary source for the reasons I have explained: it was an unsampled, unverified poll. Period. NAVA's own material shows this. Opinion polls must have a representative sample to be in the universe of reliable evidence of public opinion. Any secondary material NAVA published that derives from the unverified primary material is unreliable as well. The reference violates Wikipedia's own policies.Georgepreble (talk) 02:05, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Please bring this up at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Heraldry and vexillology instead of debating on each individual flag's talk page. The NAVA survey has been referenced by enough reputable secondary source, especially in the context of Washington's flag, that it warrants a mention on the page. SounderBruce 05:54, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of NAVA survey as source
Talk:Flag of West Virginia

message: I'm reverting the date of adoption to 7 March 1929, rather than the currently displayed date, which is the same day in 1962. 1929 is the year the article had when it received "Good" status and the edit that changed it to 1962 was from an unregistered user with no justification given other than the word for "year" in Norwegian. Given that the month and day are the same, that I haven't been able to find any sites to back up the 1962 date, and that this page in the wvlegislature.gov domain says 1929, it seems like it was some subtle vandalism. Google is pulling the date of adoption from this page and so has presumably also been showing the wrong year since that edit in 2016. If anyone has any sources to back up an adoption year of 1962 please share them.
TK-OneThreeFour (talk) 00:19, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year of adoption
Talk:Flag of Wyoming

message: Is the flag that is being used on this article (:File:Flag of Wyoming.svg) really the official flag? See this version on Encyclopedia Brittanica, this stock photo, and the image on this site. Both the seal and the bison silhouette are different in our version. The state's website has a low-quality version of the flag that also seems incorrect (there's also this version). There is a different version at Flags of the World as well. The ratios on those seem wrong as Wyoming's flag law (§ 8-3-102) says that "On the ribs of the buffalo shall be the great seal of the state of Wyoming in blue. The seal shall be in diameter one-fifth (1/5) the length of the flag." gobonobo + c 19:30, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Here's one sent from the Governor to a National Guard battalion. Anyhow, I'll go ahead and try to contact the Secretary of State and see what they have to say. Hopefully that'll clear it up. It won't be a problem to convert an image like :File:Flag of Wyoming by Verna Keays.jpg to an SVG. gobonobo + c 00:03, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Flag with incorrect seal

message: What does it mean?
65.38.128.7 (talk) 19:08, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wyomings state steal meaning
Talk:Jamie Johnson (filmmaker)

message: Has He accomplished anything?
Ok, so this kid can fund a film or two, but is there any evidence or history that shows that he's actually working to educate himself enough to effect any real changes?  With his wealth there is serious work to be done figuring out how to help people vs. giving them handouts.  He should have dug deeper into the history or pre-Katrina New Orleans to understand how generations of miss guided social programs set up the lower class for disaster.  I'd like to see what Jamie has actually done to work to address how he's going to fund programs like micro loans or industrial innovation to help people help themselves.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.128.83.160 (talk) 18:51, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Producing and directing an award-winning documentary is more than most of us have achieved. (It was his father who merely 'funded' a film.) Valetude (talk) 09:31, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Before any more brilliant thinkers get the idea to hit up the talk page and ask for money don't!   If you think you have a great idea for his next movie keep it to yourself.  Is their something the subject just has to know about? Use a different medium not this one.  This is wikipedia.  Not a magic geni or a celebrity bullhorn.   Common sense is encouraged.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1zeroate (talk • contribs) 15:10, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is not the place to attempt to address subject of article  

message: Jamie's dad's names don't match the names on his grandfather's page. It says his grandmother was Esther Underwood. Nswix (talk) 23:29, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parents names
Talk:Jamie Scott

message: * Support split - List of works takes up more than one quarter of the page, and should be split to a new article entitled List of works by Jamie Scott.  Thoughts? --Jax 0677 (talk) 00:21, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of works by Jamie Scott 

message: Request for CommentThere is a Request for Comment open about a related article So Far Away (Martin Garrix and David Guetta song). Interested editors may comment on the issue. See Talk:So Far Away (Martin Garrix and David Guetta song)#RfC - January 11. — Zawl 08:32, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  RFC 