Talk:Myocarditis

message: "myocarditis from SARS-CoV-2 is associated with a spectrum of severities from asymptomatic to fulminant, and is a complication in approximately 2-7% of COVID-19 cases"
The reference is about myocarditis in Covid-19 deaths, not Covid-19 cases:
COVID-19 myocarditis has a rate between 1.4% and 7.2% in an autopsy...Initial review of the data indicate that myocarditis was present in 20 hearts (7.2%); however, closer examination of additional reported information revealed that most cases were likely not functionally significant and the true prevalence of myocarditis is likely much lower (<2%).https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1054880720301046?via%3Dihub
The relevant information on the incidence of myocarditis in Covid-19 cases is here:
Association Between COVID-19 and Myocarditis Using Hospital-Based Administrative Data — United States, March 2020–January 2021https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7035e5.htm
I'm not up to fixing this. Someone else please? Thx.CherylJosie (talk) 07:20, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Epidemiology: Cases vs. Deaths 

message: "But" myocarditis following COVID-19 is worse. LMAO. It's so obvious that Wikipedia is pushing a political agenda. 
I mean, even if you want to argue that COVID also causes myocarditis (which frankly I don't doubt), why not just have that as a separate bullet point? But no, it's just absolutely necessary for Wikipedia to go on a long tirade trying to rationalie how vaccines are good. 2001:569:57B2:4D00:95B6:294E:CD03:C607 (talk) 02:48, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why do you need a "but" for COVID? 

message: A source suggests a much higher risk than stated in the article: Estimates of incidence have mostly ranged between about 1 case per 2,500 to 1 case per 10,000 among males aged 12-17 after their second dose. (https://www.vaccinesafety.edu/do-vaccines-cause-myocarditis-and-or-myocardopathy/) Pakbelang (talk) 00:34, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Would need reliable sourcing i.e. WP:MEDRS. Bon courage (talk) 06:34, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Myocarditis risk following vaccination 

message: Mentioning this seems POV. Especially without mentioning that, you know, COVID itself is a risk. Why not single something else out, like cocaine? Bon courage (talk) 11:12, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: This topic has received significant media coverage, it is actively researched and it is monitored by the CDC. I don't object to presenting this risk in the proper context of the risk posed by COVID-19 itself, but omitting it entirely goes against WP:ASPECT. I like it how this topic was presented for example in Circulation: "Overall, the risk of myocarditis is greater after SARS-CoV-2 infection than after COVID-19 vaccination and remains modest after sequential doses including a booster dose of BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine. However, the risk of myocarditis after vaccination is higher in younger men, particularly after a second dose of the mRNA-1273 vaccine." --TadejM my talk 11:29, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: So are other things being actively researched for this, like Monkeypox vaccine. COVID vaccines are already mentioned in detail in the list that follows. Why does it need to be pulled out and showcased again? Especially without any context about COVID itself? Bon courage (talk) 11:34, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

text: This discussion topic is about the COVID-19 vaccine. Thank you for bringing up that the covid-19 vaccine information is mentioned elsewhere in the article. In my opinion the article as it currently stands is fine in this regard. Anyway, feel welcome to add this info about the monkeypox vaccine if it has received prominent coverage in published, reliable sources. Please note that WP:NPOV requires that "mainspace articles and pages fairly represent all significant viewpoints". -TadejM my talk 11:50, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  COVID vaccine cause 

message: The article mentioned how post COVID myocarditis is rare, but most commonly severe, shouldn’t this mention that German study where nearly 80 percent of COVID patients had recorded abnormal ties after recovering? Patty J H (talk) 18:55, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should it be mentioned?