Talk:Neverwinter Nights 2: Mask of the Betrayer

message: Base Class: Spirit Shaman
The spirit shaman has been described as "sorcerer version" of the druid. In addition, "...as they level, (they) get better with the weapon their deity favors." [3]
[edit] Base Class: Favored Soul
The favored soul has been described as a "sorcerer version" of the cleric. In addition, "The Spirit Shaman can turn undead and even transform themselves into an undead.
Correct me if I am wrong. But I think that these two classes are mixed up. As far as I know the Spirit Shaman has a better chance of controlling and perhaps change into an undead when the Favored Soul does not. Also the Favored Soul has the Weapon favors from their Deity don't they? Unless told otherwise I will edit these posts. 24.226.195.58 18:19, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spirit Shamen/Favored Soul Description 

message: As far as I know the Red Wizards of They are an organization. The name for the Prestige class would be the Red Wizard would it not? Bognus Hecken 14:07, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Red Wizards of They 

message: The game doesn't distinguish between main quest and side quests. I am under the impression that the whole Wood Man trip is optional. As such, I didn't write it into plot section. Can anyone else confirm this? --Voidvector 10:45, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I completed the main storyline today, and totaly forgot about that. However, I suspect that it may have some major influence on what endings you may get, as those i could get felt incomplete somehow, as if i missed something (like that still open quest). --195.158.180.61 16:02, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Required quests 

message: I'm thinking we should remove the stats from the races section, it's abbreviated and seems a bit like cruft. Opinions? OSbornarfcontributionatoration 15:24, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it should be done. It is more geared for game manual. --Voidvector 22:21, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: Races 

message: Is this being ported to MAC? Does anyone know? Vaughnstull (talk) 21:50, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  MAC Support 

message: I'll pitch in where I can; let me know if there's anything specific you'd like me to help out with! –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 03:16, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm almost done with a Development section, so we can check that one off soon.  Gameplay will be easy; it just needs to be written along the lines of Zehir and Westgate, we can cite reviews for it.  Looks like you've gone and done an excellent Reception section already.  For the massively bloated Plot section, we may need someone who's actually played the game (not me) to slice it up.  Reviews will give us only a paragraph's worth of information at best.  Any ideas?  Vantine84 (talk) 11:41, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Giving this one another go? 

message: There's a nasty case of bias going on in this article which isn't NPOV. It's backed up by weasel words (some reviewers) and paragraphs which should go into the Critical Reception section.
I'd make these edits myself, but I worry that they'd get reversed. Essentially, this article reads more like a review than an article. 77.107.172.208 (talk) 01:17, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Care to point out some specific examples?  I mean it did pass the Good Article criteria, so it can't be too bad. 99.126.204.164 (talk) 03:40, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Article is very biased.