lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Albrecht, Duke of Bavaria

message: Is it worth mentioning in the article that, if the monarchy hadn't been abolished in 1918, Albrecht would have become the longest reigning King of Bavaria with almost 41 years of rule? EA210269 (talk) 07:17, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The Wikipedia:No original research policy forbids synthesis.  It is a published fact that Albrecht's father died in 1955, and that Albrecht died in 1996.  However, I cannot think of a published source which has put these three facts together and said "Albrecht would have become the longest reigning King of Bavaria". Wikipedia only summarizes what has already published. Noel S McFerran (talk) 12:46, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair enough. There propably is a source somewhere out there, counting reigns of monarchs and would-be-monarchs but considering how trivial the fact is, I can't be bothered searching for it.EA210269 (talk) 12:56, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I wouldn't think No original research refers to simple facts that can easily be calculated without possible contradiction by everyone, and which seem to fit into a fine nice-to-read article according to the feeling of its author. --84.154.75.5 (talk) 15:58, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: How do you know that Albrech would not have abdicated had he become king? How do you know that the monarchy would not have been abolished between his accession and his death? How do you know that Albrecht would not have been assassinated had he become king? There are just too many ifs. Surtsicna (talk) 16:05, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Reign
Talk:Alonso de Guzmán y Sotomayor, 7th Duke of Medina Sidonia

message: This article appears to be taken from the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica.  If we go by Garrett Mattingley's account, we should not make such a negative assessment of Medina Sidonia, this could be one case where the 1911 Britannica has been overtaken by more recent scholarship.  Comparison with the Spanish wikipedia article would be useful. PatGallacher 13:21, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: An Army officer in charge of the Spanish Navy? (UTC)—Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.58.20.4 (talk), as of 19:57, April 26, 2007 (UTC)--That much is correct.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.69.100.55 (talk), as of 15:59, May 15, 2007 (UTC)
I edited the page to give a more balanced account of the Duke's performance as commander of the Armada.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.194.241.83 (talk) 02:24, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

text: I removed the NPOV tag for two reasons. One, apparently the above editor attempted to make it "more balanced." (Please don't interpret that as a set of scare quotes-- I actually quite like that editor's additions.) Secondly, and more importantly, whoever added the tag didn't make any specific requests or criticisms. Neutrality complaints need to be more specific. DCB4W (talk) 19:18, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Source of Article

message: We have 1 September 1550 and 26 July 1615.  Of the other language versions, only the Polish article agrees.  All the others have a birth date of 10 September, and a death year of 1615 but no precise date.  I assume our birth date is just a typo for 10 September (because his name appears in 10 September and not 1 September), but why do we have a precise death date but the others don't?  --  Jack of Oz [your turn] 02:42, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Vital dates

message: Where are the necessary inline citations? Article is in sorry shape. 50.111.51.247 (talk) 04:18, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: no references
Talk:Archduke Leopold of Austria, Prince of Tuscany

message: In this article it says Leopold was "cleared of a grand larceny charge" though in other articles such as Napoleon Diamond Necklace and Infanta Maria Theresa of Portugal it says Leopold was jailed. 155.4.96.9 (talk) 15:56, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: He voluntarily turned himself in and spent twelve days in jail before a neighbour posted his bail bond. So both are true. He was actually convicted on the larceny charge the first time around—it was vacated on appeal. GeeJo (t)⁄(c) • 04:19, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jailed or cleared?
Talk:Archduke Maximilian Francis of Austria

message: This article is currently duplicated (both versions lack any references or sources). See:
*
*
Best regards, Ev (talk) 13:46, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article duplicated 

message: Perhaps the article should mention that Mozart dedicated Il re pastore to Maximilian Francis.24.189.108.166 (talk) 05:22, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mozart
Talk:Louis Begley

message: This article has been reverted by a bot to  as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) This has been done to remove User:Accotink2's contributions as they have a history of extensive copyright violation and so it is assumed that all of their major contributions are copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. VWBot (talk) 06:06, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 

message: This seems a bit odd, as draftees generally served two years, but spent the first few months doing (1) boot camp and then (2) more specialized training. So it's not the he spent his lastBold text 6 months with the 9th Div in West Germany (not Germany; the country wasn't reunited until around 1990), rather that that is where he was assignedItalic text once his basic training was complete. Theonemacduff (talk) 18:17, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  The last 18 months
Talk:Charles Alexander, Grand Duke of Saxe-Weimar-Eisenach

message: Since titles are used, for consistancy's sake, use titles for all entries in the chart.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cladeal832 (talk • contribs) 19:04, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Incorrect, when the ancestry charts were first being implemented, they were being linked as the article titles did or should appear, according to WP:NC(NT) and also to avoid redirects. They are going to be changed back to that form for the sake of consistency with article titles and with WP:NC(NT), which is a standard for article titles. Wikipedia is not consistent for all royals and WP:NC(NT) only gives consistency for groups of royals, such as monarchs, consorts and other royals. Charles 20:20, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I am reverting the edits again as Cladeal has not come to the talk page to discuss them as instructed by the administrator. This issue is now at WP:AN/I. The reason for reverting is to avoid superfluous, unnecessary titles that don't appear in the article titles and which do not add anything to the article. There is not reason to add these titles, not even a standard. The only standard for naming articles is WP:NC(NT). Charles 03:06, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  What's wrong with redirects? 24.57.196.130 04:26, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Talk:William I of Württemberg#What's wrong with redirects?. Charles 04:57, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ancestry Section 

message: I have tried to convert the article into clear English. I have not entirely succeeded: I have no idea what the clauses about "samaritan" and "how/as" mean, and unfortunately I don't know German. Maproom (talk) 17:52, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Language
Talk:Boekentoren

message: The short article about the Ghent University Library was created after Boekentoren, which already existed.  The two articles should be merged, but which one should remain -- A or B?
* A -- Boekentoren --> Ghent University Library?
* B -- Ghent University Library --> Boekentoren?
If there is no objection, the resulting choice will likely become A -- and the Dutch-entitled article will be folded into Ghent University Library at the end of April. Are there any objections?  --Tenmei (talk) 14:30, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Phoumi Nosavan

message: Mass deletion of uncited material, to be replaced by a new fully cited article.Georgejdorner (talk) 01:15, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  New article coming. 

message: Hello fellow Wikpedians,
I have noticed that "Fall" as cited by the article has no external link or mention of their publication. Does anyone have any idea what it is? 
Thanks.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Souphanouvongenjoyer (talk • contribs) 03:41, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: That is probably Bernard B. Fall, a French journalist who was one of the world's leading experts on Southeast Asia. I was not the person who added that material in, but the book is almost certainly Anatomy of a Crisis: The Laotian Crisis of 1960-1961, which was Fall's last book. I hope this helps. --A.S. Brown (talk) 06:46, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations of "Fall"
Talk:That's Carry On!

message: The writer of this film "That's Carry On" is described as Anthony Church. The actual writer is Tony Church ( Gerald Anthony Church ). This is know by me as I'm his son ( or was as he died in 1995 ). This really needs a disambiguation page as Tony Church could refer to the one "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tony_Church"[currently on Wikipedia] or my father ( a little known trailer writer, worked for a company called G.S.E ).
I'm not too hot on how to update wikipedia so you'll have to forgive any mistakes I make.
Spider23 16:17, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Writer of this film is incorrect
Talk:Carry On Columbus

message: Following on the tag inserted some while ago, this article would strongly benefit from critical reviews, mentions in books ... anything of that ilk.
Apparently critics of the time and regular fans of the Carry On series didn't see what they'd come to expect, but current Amazon reviews member reviews suggest a majority of viewers found it enjoyable.
Could we get some attention? Balance? 76.126.217.195 (talk) 01:15, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It is true that this film was absolutely panned when released, and the article accurately reflects this. I've never understood the negative reception, as I've always found it quite funny with some great performances and clever gags. It does have a different tone than earlier Carry Ons though, and while the old school fans didn't like Rik Mayall, Alexei Sayle et al, the alternative comedy fans felt the same people had sold out and gone mainstream. I think it's stood the test of time better than many other Carry Ons though. --Ef80 (talk) 16:01, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definitely could use sources
Talk:Prince Emanuele Filiberto, Duke of Aosta

message: I don't have the sources, but if anybody does, such sources would help to explain why Emanuele didn't ascend the Spanish throne, after his father abdicated. 
GoodDay (talk) 04:18, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amadeus' abdication 

message: He was briefly prince of Asturias during is father’s reign as king of Spain, shouldn’t it be added? Jorgebox4 (talk) 10:38, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prince of Asturias 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) EggRoll97 (talk)  05:12, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Prince Emanuele Filiberto, Duke of Aosta (1869–1931) →  – The other Prince Emanuele Filiberto, Duke of Aosta died aged 3 so this one is obviously the primary topic. No need for dates as disambiguation, hatnote is present as well. Killuminator (talk) 04:37, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

text: Support - I agree that this is definitely the primary topic. But I think any disambiguation could be avoided for either as I believe Italian dukes are numbered (royal or not). So it looks like this Emmanuele Filiberto was called the 2nd Duke of Aosta (his father Amedeo I of Spain being the first duke. The other Prince Emmanuele Filiberto, Duke of Aosta was the only Duke of his 'creation' (using British terms for Italy because I have no clue what the Italian equivalent may be). So I would say move Prince Emanuele Filiberto, Duke of Aosta (1869–1931) to Prince Emanuele Filiberto, 2nd Duke of Aosta and Prince Emanuele Filiberto, Duke of Aosta (1731–1735) to the base name, with a hatnote on both (or just the latter). estar8806 (talk) ★ 13:16, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 10 September 2023
Talk:FACTS (magazine)

message: Last issue was somewhen end of July see http://www.facts.ch/dyn/magazin/wirtschaft/763902.html (in German) --212.152.18.59 20:43, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  not issued anymore! 
Talk:Ringier

message: The information is irrelevant here, and unsourced as well. There is an entry for Andre Ringier as well, where you might put information about the religious believe of the CEO. This article is about the company. --Lord Chao 01:09, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Pulmonary consolidation

message: what do you mean by consolidation?— Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.153.35.33 (talk) 06:21, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition 

message: I have no idea of what "more markedly" means in this context. Unfree (talk) 17:13, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: "Markedly"

message: "The fluid can be pulmonary edema...."  If I'm not mistaken, edema is a condition, not a substance. Unfree (talk) 17:29, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Edema

message: The articles Pulmonary consolidation, Pulmonary infiltrate and Pulmonary edema exist.  The first two are underferenced and to a non MD like me, it is unclear if they are the same.  —PaleoNeonate – 10:33, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Redundancy
Talk:Pat Musick

message: Can we please get a better image for the InfoBox. The one that is there now is really horrible. YborCityJohn (talk) 03:03, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  InfoBox Image 

message: Isn’t Pat Musick divorced? NDEdminson (talk) 03:01, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Husband 

message: An accurate and properly-sourced date of birth is needed for this person. Xboxsponge15 (talk) 21:37, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category:Date of birth missing (living people)
Talk:Former Admiralty House

message: I changed the rating from Start to stub based on the following
1. History section is good, but mainly based on the primary source which I had provided (an updated copy of the one w/o inline citation which I deleted). This is basically copy + paste from a primary source which there is no secondary support.
2. Architecture is totally uncited
3. Still somewhat POV.
4. Totally no pictures whatsoever
I changed the importance rating to Mid as this is the only national monument in the north. (with all the history) Also, this will be the site of Sembawang Sports and Communtiy Hub (which will need it's own article with parts of this incoporated) the 3rd such hub in Singapore 
This article needs much work and I will try to expand it but after Canberra MRT  and Canberra Plaza is done. I hope this explains.--Quek157 (talk) 21:19, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rating
Talk:Infante Augusto, Duke of Coimbra

message: When was he created Duke of Coimbra? His older brother Fernando didn't have a title when he died so would it have been created when he became heir or when he reached adulthood.
: Well in the Gentlemen's magazine of 1862, he is referred to merely as a prince and not by a ducal title, which is what the British periodical would have referred to him as if appropriate. Being a year after his brothers' deaths and when he was heir, I'm going to say the title was probably conferred when the prince came of age. This is purely my research and no way fact or anything else. Cheers, I hope this helped! Cristiano Tomás (talk) 00:50, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duke of Coimbra
Talk:Genuardi's

message: This page reads like an advertisement, except for the parts that mention the Safeway buyout negatively.  Doesn't this sound slightly unencyclopedic?  This article seems biased... was everything really perfect and happy and non-evil when the family owned it? --Skyfaller 06:31, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. This looks more like a Genuardi's store autobiography than an encyclopedia article. 206.53.196.195 (talk) 01:03, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Advertisement?

message: "Discussions with former and past employees" == original research.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Splat215 (talk • contribs) 03:39, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original Research 

message: In 2012, Genaurdi's had announced that the chain was filing for bankruptcy and that all remaining stores would close.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.5.122.1 (talk) 20:18, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bankruptcy
Talk:Hercules Returns

message: The 'Return of Hercules' bit was a famous Saturday Night Live skit featuring Bill Murray in 1987 with nearly the same basic joke.  Did this movie steal that bit?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.80.81.193 (talk) 16:37, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I doubt it, we don't get Staurday Night Live here. Katana Geldar 22:40, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Return of Hercules
Category talk:American Chinese cuisine

message: There are a couple inaccurate entries here. The following dishes ARE NOT Chinese-American but rather proper Chinese dishes:
* Cashew Chicken
* Chow Mein
* Egg Drop soup
* Fried Rice
* Kung Pao Chicken
* Lo Mein
* Yang-chow Fried Rice
* Shrimp Toast (this is not traditional Chinese but rather a Hong Kong dish invented through the fusion of western and Chinese cuisine).
You can correct it yourself--NeoBatfreak (talk) 18:09, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Should this be :Category:Chinese-American cuisine? ---Another Believer (Talk) 02:37, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:Mate

message: Shouldn't the chimarrão article be merged with this one? Rsazevedo 11:02, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it seems like a good combination. __Just plain Bill (talk) 17:30, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: chimarrao

message: For accent on the maté, see the discussion page at yerba maté. -LlywelynII (talk) 13:42, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: yerba mate

message: Looking for info on this. Does Wikipedia have a page yet?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.105.240.177 (talk) 23:48, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  MATE Desktop 
Talk:Religion in Cuba

message: I deleted a phrase from the end of the Santería section that was a straight-up misquote. It was attempting to talk about the racial demographics of the religion but just inserted "Santería" where the quoted material said "Esperitismo," which seems to be intertwined with Santería but not at all interchangeable. It also mentioned Palo Mayombe and Vodú, which aren't mentioned anywhere else in the article but perhaps should be. It could be worthwhile to more thoroughly address the racial demographics of the religions brought up in this article, and perhaps go more in depth on other afro-cuban religions besides Santería. WiseAdam (talk) 20:45, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Racial demographics
Talk:Piano Concerto No. 14 (Mozart)

message: Many thanks to Schissel for creating the first draft of this article here:User:Schissel/Tmp#Piano_Concerto_No._14_.28Mozart.29 DavidRF 06:59, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  First Version 

message: The "Contents" box at the top does not list the second movement, and lists the third as "2.2." I've tried to fix this, but can't figure out how, since the html does not show this part of the page.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:643:8104:730:3854:822F:273A:3C08 (talk) 03:28, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: That's because nobody has written anything here about the second movement. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 03:34, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second movement missing
Talk:William II of Württemberg

message: Since titles such as Emperor or King or Duke or Duchess or Princess or Infanta are used, for consistancy's sake, use titles for all entries in the chart.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cladeal832 (talk • contribs) 18:59, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Incorrect, when the ancestry charts were first being implemented, they were being linked as the article titles did or should appear, according to WP:NC(NT) and also to avoid redirects. They are going to be changed back to that form for the sake of consistency with article titles and with WP:NC(NT), which is a standard for article titles. Wikipedia is not consistent for all royals and WP:NC(NT) only gives consistency for groups of royals, such as monarchs, consorts and other royals. Charles 20:19, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ancestry Chart 

message: As mentioned, Wilhelm II of Württemberg was a most popular and friendly king who was greeted by people in the street as „Mister King“. With the title of the Duke of Württemberg he lived, after 1918, his final three years in the Bebenhausen Castle out of Tübingen (and in his castle in Friedrichshafen on Constance Lake). A grandaunt of mine saw him walking around from time to time when she was in Bebenhausen for buying agricultural food.
Still, the revolution of 1918 with folks intruding into his Stuttgart palace (Wilhelmspalais, today with a statue of him and his two dogs in front of the building) made him pretty furious. For that reason he ordered in his will to be taken posthumously to the cemetery of Ludwigsburg which is north of Stuttgart, to be buried there. But he insisted that the city limits of Stuttgart must not be touched at all when moving his dead body. So the funeral procession made a long way around Stuttgart to fulfill his oder.
Those who speak German will find many fine and even funny anecdotes on Wilhelm II in this small book: http://www.amazon.de/gelernte-K%C3%B6nig-Anni-Willmann/dp/3939500151/ref=sr_1_5?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1368708667&sr=1-5&keywords=k%C3%B6nig+w%C3%BCrttemberg  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Josh4000 (talk • contribs) 12:55, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: At this point, I would like to briefly note that the above mentioned statue of the king with his two dogs was removed during the conversion of the old Wilhelmspalais into the new heritage centre of the city, called Stadtpalais. It is now no longer in its old place, but behind the building in Urban street. --Stolp (talk) 14:02, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wilhelm II and his final years 

message: This is nonsense. His claim did not appear contrary to Salic Law. His claim was, in fact, exactly what one would expect under Salic Law. If Salic Law were not in operation, his mother would have succeeded to the throne. john k (talk) 13:10, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  His claimed appeared contrary to Salic Law?
Talk:List of rivers of China

message: Ok I just checked in google using phonetic spelling and the word 'Jiang' appears to mean 'River' 
So should various rivers be getting called the XXXjiang River or just the XXX river. I'm not sure what the common practice is in this case? EdwardLane (talk) 10:20, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: See WP:NC-ZH#Topographical. The generally accepted conventions/guidelines in effect asks editors to avoid such pleonasms as "Mudanjiang River". —HXL's Roundtable and Record 13:34, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jiang means river  

message: Shall Buir Lake here?Only 10 percent of it is administrated by PRC. Frost-CHN (talk) 06:47, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  About the waterbody between boundary