Talk:Buck converter

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Buck converter. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091125131031/http://www.powerdesignersusa.com:80/InfoWeb/resources/pe_html/pe07_nc8.htm to http://www.powerdesignersusa.com/InfoWeb/resources/pe_html/pe07_nc8.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:35, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Buck converter. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110716175041/http://www.ee.iitb.ac.in/vlsi/wb/pages/slides/MSB-BC.pdf to http://www.ee.iitb.ac.in/vlsi/wb/pages/slides/MSB-BC.pdf
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.powerdesignersusa.com/InfoWeb/resources/pe_html/pe07_nc8.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:10, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Who invented the Buck converter and when?
What is the oldest published circuit schematic of the Buck converter?
This article on the Forward converter claims the Buck and the Boost converters date to the early 1920s: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.362.6824&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
ICE77 (talk) 08:32, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inventor and year 

message: The image in the introduction of the "Buck converter" article shows a buck, boost, buck-boost, and Ćuk converter, but the only identifying text in the image is cut-off, leaving them individually unlabeled. We *should not* assume that the caption below the image is enough to make their identities clear, _especially_ since that caption may be altered without the image being altered to match. Preferably a further cut-down version which _only_ shows the buck converter should be used (because it is distinctly odd to be showing converters _other_ than a buck converter in the *introduction* to the buck converter article, as those should be left to further sections of the article where they can be contrasted with the buck converter, something which shouldn't be done in the introduction), or the original version of the image (which I have seen before, and which had all four types labeled) should be used instead. 2602:301:7764:AC00:201B:C2B5:B0DE:D4B (talk) 20:49, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I have reverted the image on Wikimedia Commons, but it takes a while to percolate back up to the main page and through all the mirror sites. Constant314 (talk) 22:30, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poorly selected intro image