lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Advance Wars 2: Black Hole Rising

message: Anyone who is qualified, might you delete the character list and actually delve into the characters as opposed to how they perform? -- A Link to the Past 16:49, August 5, 2005 (UTC)
:So delete the table, and add personality information? Sure. --Tjstrf 18:11, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  The bulk of this article is game-specific information about the CO's.  This looks like it needs to be scrapped and completely rebuilt, covering at the least the gameplay and major changes from previous versions. BCampbell 15:14, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I reformatted the CO section after User:69.194.122.190 completed the information about the other COs. I find this way a bit better than using ==== for each CO name (the table of contents became too long) or letting the paragraphs against the left margin. Opinions? -- ReyBrujo 04:44, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: Does it bother anyone else that there are two sites listed as the "largest advance wars site on the web"? And maybe the "Give it spin!" should be removed... It sounds too much like advertising.
198.145.86.158 05:24, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You are right. Either clean (remove) some of them (if possible, assert notability per amount of forum members, Alexa ranking, amount of advertisment, third party program requirements and stuff according to external links guidelines), or tag the section with  so that other can do that later. -- ReyBrujo 05:30, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Links 

message: And I quote:
"Black Hole Rising is nearly identical to the previous game in terms of core gameplay. Therefore, please refer here for information about the battle system, terrain, units, game modes, and COs and their powers. The new features as they pertain to this game are covered below."
Is this some kind of joke?  This makes a mockery of Wikipedia.  For information about this particular game, go to another article?  Not good enough, not by a long shot, and I'll be changing it ASAP.  Geoff B 19:03, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Heh, shows how much I know about Wikipedia morality; when I wrote it like that a half-year ago I was dead serious. ^_^ While I don't see anything mocking about it, in retrospect this is something that does not a Good Article make, so my suggestion as a start is to copy the General Overview section at the start of Advance Wars Dual Strike and put that in place of the offending passage. Erik Jensen (Appreciate|Donate) 19:49, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

text: Ah, sorry, I was just flicking through the WP entries for the AW series, and it just took me by surprise.  Geoff B 19:55, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, I wasn't offended. And this is a little something I recently realized needed to be taken care of sooner or later. Erik Jensen (Appreciate|Donate) 19:58, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: New Features

message: I have rewritten most of the major sections of the article (to fix/enhance), please review these changes and see if anything could be edited further. Thanks. <3 bunny 04:00, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  rewrite
Talk:Arab culture in France

message: This article survived a Vote for Deletion. The discussion can be found here. -Splash 20:23, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Vote for Deletion

message: I suggest that many not just the ethnic French might condemn fundamentalism (by which it might mean here extremism), though the only issued raised are rater trivial ones of dress code.  I have alaos removed as a threat.
Chasnor15 (talk) 16:20, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV edit

message: This concerns POV tag cleanup.  Whenever an POV tag is placed, it is necessary to also post a message in the discussion section stating clearly why it is thought the article does not comply with POV guidelines, and suggestions for how to improve it.  This permits discussion and consensus among editors.  From WP tag policy: Drive-by tagging is strongly discouraged. The editor who adds the tag must address the issues on the talk page, pointing to specific issues that are actionable within the content policies, namely Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia:Verifiability, Wikipedia:No original research and Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. Simply being of the opinion that a page is not neutral is not sufficient to justify the addition of the tag. Tags should be added as a last resort.  Better yet, edit the topic yourself with the improvements.  This statement is not a judgement of content, it is only a cleanup of frivolously and/or arbitrarily placed tags.  No discussion, no tag.Jjdon (talk) 21:28, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV tag 

message: autonomia  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.53.105.192 (talk) 10:54, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  autonomia
Talk:The Self-Destruction of Gia

message: A message for the original contributor: thank you for contributing, but wikipedia doesn't accept reviews and personal opinions, it only does "boring" facts. Kappa 17:01, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I second Kappa's remarks above.  I added a  tag because I didn't even recognize it as pertaining to a movie.  Kappa's edit is completely appropriate, and feel free to add WP:NPOV content if you want.  Thanks! - Chairboy 17:24, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ibram Lassaw

message: The material added by an anonymous contributor seems to be a cut and paste from some unknown source written by Denise Lassaw, the subject's daughter. Possible CV? --Big_Iron 17:03, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Much of it seems to come from this page: . I reverted to the stub version before the material was added. -Aranel ("Sarah") 00:08, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Khvalynsk culture

message: Is it derived from the city name of Khvalynsk or from the general Khvalyn area of Caspian Sea, used in such geological terms as "Khvalyn terrace", "Khvalyn sediments," etc. ? mikka (t) 17:10, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: it's named for two cemeteries found near the modern town. I'm guessing that Saratov Oblast and Samara Oblast are on opposite sides of the Volga. This might be significant in explaining the apparent problem with the dates.
For the dates see my note at Talk:Samara culture --FourthAve 14:11, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Old talk

message: Which layman on earth continuously confuses these geologic/biological subdivisions into prehistory/archaeology!? We have our own subdivisions as e.g. neolithic. 195.4.77.253 (talk) 14:12, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: "Holocene Epoch"

message: The article states "A 67 m high earthen kurgan at Nalchik, approximately thirty metres in diameter, contained 121 individual graves...". 
Two questions on this: first of al these dimension seem impossible (67 m high with a diameter of 30 m, would look much like the great lighthouse of Alexandria. Secondly the place mentioned is almost in the Caucasus, so if this is right the map is wrong, or does the map only show the original site and did they quickly spread out from there during the fifth millenium BC. If so, this would be the logical precursor of the Maykop-culture (being situated right in the centre of Maykop) and it would be nice to read something about such connections, if correct.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Codiv (talk • contribs) 13:02, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did it spread all the way to Nalchik? 

message: The map contradicts the geographical range described in the intro. Please correct Yourself. Thank You. HJJHolm (talk) 08:38, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  More mistakes
Talk:List of mayors of Louisville, Kentucky

message: Good idea to create a link to all mayors? I think it's a position of "automatic notability" and we should have articles on each of them eventually. --W.marsh 04:11, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Most definitely yes. Thank you again. :) Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 04:13, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  links 
Talk:Skybridge (TransLink)/Archive 1

message: If you VANDASLISE my page, these SIMILAR photos should be VANDALISE and poked with a hot stick:
. Broonee 17:46, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: And, this is not your article/page, the article belongs to everyone. Zscout370 (Sound Off) 00:43, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other photos to be removed 

message: Do not disrupt Wikipedia to make a point.  Do not threaten to disrupt Wikipedia to make a point.
Robert McClenon 15:03, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: And, this is not your article/page, the article belongs to everyone. Zscout370 (Sound Off) 00:43, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Caution

message: There were complaints about the existing Skybridge image. I took several photos of the Skybridge and made them freely available via Flickr at VancouverBCSkybridge. -- 154.20.235.123 23:20, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Skybridge Photos
Talk:The Napoleon of Notting Hill

message: These claims that Gandhi and Michael Collins were influenced by The Napoleon of Notting Hill really need to be substantiated. In the case of Michael Collins, I believe he said somthing about the book, I will try to dig it out. 
As far a Gandhi is concerned, on the main Chesterton article there is a different claim that he was influenced by a piece of Chesterton's journalism (as apposed to tNoNH). It really should be established which (if either) of these claims is correct, otherwise they should be removed.  Iron Ghost August 5th, 2005
Pearce's biography talks about this novel's influence on Michael Collins, but it doesn't say the novel influenced Gandhi. It does say that an article Chesterton wrote in the Illustrated London News in October 1910 about Indian nationalism affected Gandhi 'profoundly.'
 Jontveit March 19, 2006
I recall that one of the main themes of this book was the absurd rivalry between neighbourhoods of the same city. It would be good if someone fresher with the material would add it in.--70.51.173.186 (talk) 12:39, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Claims of influence

message: Gaiman mentions that the book was "hugely informed" his novel Neverwhere here:
http://www.mythsoc.org/mythcon/35/speech/.
Can someone who knows how to reference add it in the article?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.205.4.166 (talk) 18:58, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gaiman
Talk:Marsupium

message: I removed a redirect to "puch", since it in turn redriects to some specific pouch. I dont really know what is, but it certainly doesn't have anything to do with marsupiums
:I've redirected to Marsupial. FreplySpang (talk) 17:55, August 5, 2005 (UTC)
::Well, it was only half well-done. Marsupium is the technical name for the marsupial pouch. I've fixed it. Taragüí @ 10:21, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Psychedelic Sexfunk Live from Heaven

message: Why oh why bother to go to this much effort and not even include a link back to the wikipedia page for the band itself?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Hot_Chili_Peppers
Somebody on that page bothered to link to yours!
hb
:I added a link back to RHCP... What else needs to be done? 
5ii 18:31, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article was obviously copied directly from some other unsited source. This source needs to be sited, and the article also has extreme bias. BIG rewrite needed. - Bagel7 05:45, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Problems
Talk:Potential gradient

message: What the hell have the previous editors of the page been doing all this time?... More references and scope will be added soon - at least we have something of a short article instead of essentially zero content.--  F = q(E + v × B) 00:45, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Extend scope

message: The edit summary:
*Add clarification template to a meaningless sentence:
::"The potential gradient is relatively abrupt, since there is an almost definite boundary between the metal and solution, hence the term interface."
:(in the hope someone can rewrite it), 
*some slight rewriting, 
*try the  template
*changed headings (the first section used algebra, one-variable elementary calculus, then vector calculus, the next section continued vector calculus... so just split into 1d and 3d).
Feedback welcome. M∧Ŝc2ħεИτlk 16:54, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Potential_gradient&diff=542229275&oldid=541002553 Recent edits]
Talk:Cypress Hills Interprovincial Park

message: I noticed West Block is capitalised in the history section but no where else. East block and centre block are not capitalised. I was going to capitalise it all as, to me at least, they're proper nouns describing a named area. Before I do that, though, I just want to bring it up here first incase I'm wrong. Thoughts? Masterhatch (talk) 13:03, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  West Block vs. west block
Talk:List of notable Chicanos

message: There is also a List of Chicano poets, which also includes writers of prose and drama.  And of course there is the Category Mexican Americans.  I suggest we merge the two lists and place it in the Mexican Americans category, alphabetizing the people listed by last name and with a brief description of what the person does or did.  I'm going to leave a parallel comment on the list of poets to survey sentiment.--Rockero 17:54, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Great idea! Joaquin Murietta 14:58, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I second. I will start this in a couple of days unless anyone objects.68.0.84.212 18:34, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As this hasn't happened yet, if no one objects I shall start to do this in three days time. -- Matthew Edwards 04:31, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Pantheon, London

message: The original Roman Pantheon is remarkable because "almost two thousand years after it was built, its dome is still the world's largest unreinforced concrete dome."  Its dome is 43.3 metres in diameter and weighs 4,535 metric tons.  So, how does the London Pantheon's dome compare?  Of what material was it built? What was its diameter? 199.46.199.230 (talk) 00:39, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Dome

message: The link to the Marks & Spencer store is a bit lame. At least it has a picture of the building in its current state. Pilatus 17:57, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Modern store
Talk:Citizens for a Free Kuwait

message: Even damned near two years after the first complaints, this article reads like an op-ed piece. Black gold fiefdom, what in the holy hell? Come on, this is a notable subject, but the writing is atrocious. 72.138.111.182 (talk) 08:57, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article makes me want to shoot myself, and here's why 

message: At least some of the article seems to be copied from this source, which is given as an external link: John Stauber and Sheldon Rampton, "How PR Sold the War in the Persian Gulf," excerpted from Toxic Sludge Is Good For You: Lies, Damn Lies and the Public Relations Industry (Monroe, ME: Common Courage Press), 1995.
:I've stubbed the article to remove the copyvio. Ice Cold Beer (talk) 04:57, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. Steve Dufour (talk) 06:33, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright problem

message: Please see Talk:Nayirah_(testimony)#RfC: Nayirah (testimony) and Citizens for a Free Kuwait. Viriditas (talk) 23:58, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfC: Nayirah (testimony) and Citizens for a Free Kuwait
Talk:Downham Estate

message: The writer of this article presupposes that readers need to know very little about the exact location of the estate! "... on the borders of Lewisham and Bromley boroughs ..." is far too vague. It seems a great pity that, with the very comprehensive external link on it, the article wasn't more forthcoming. Peter Shearan 18:16, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Location
Talk:U.S. Postal Service cycling team

message: As a huge fan of the Wiki, I am really dissapointed at how biased this article is regarding the issue of US Postal sponsorhip of European sporting events.  The article should say "there was controversy" and leave it at that.  There is no reason to say that the other side's arguements are "easily refuted" -- especially when many may agree with that side.  Postal watch has a good point:
"They raised domestic monopoly rates three times while forcing captive ratepayers to pay more than $50 million to sponsor a European sporting event and then, adding insult to injury, they achieved a negative result."
Just note the controversy and leave it at that.  No one cares what your political opinion is.
I removed some of the anti-postalwatch text.  This material seemed very non-NPOV, and in fact the article
attacked postal watch without even linking it in the external links so readers could take a look for
themselves. 12.203.37.90 09:20, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Initial events of the Rwandan genocide

message: In a few hours the Presidential Guard and the Interahamwe militiamen had started fighting in Kigali and in certain other regions of Rwanda, especially in the North West.  Even if the attacks were not organized beforehand, it appears that for all Rwandans, the initial attacks signified a strong and unambiguous signal.  Those who were going to kill knew what they needed to do, and the Tutsis and moderate Hutus understood immediately that they were going to be attacked.</blockquote>
I commented the above out of the first section of the page. Can anybody think of a good way to revise it? I feel like it's in need of serious work. —CrazyDrumGuy 18:26, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Triggering of the first massacres starting at sunrise on 7 April 1994 

message: This is the most extreme version of several different accounts of how exactly the Belgians died. In fact they defended themselves for several hours with captured weapons before being killed, and other sources indicate they were killed in combat either by hand grenades or by machetes in close quarters. The Peterson quote about cutting tendons and gagging on penises ought to be qualified somehow in this and other articles where it is referenced.69.140.1.172 (talk) 17:14, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no evidence this happened. All investigations, court documents and witness accounts contradict the authors story. This story by author has also become the primary talking point about the genocide. Why is the 10 Belgium solders death in manor contradictory to all evidence so much more important and prominent on Wikipedia than the genocide of hundreds of thousands of Africans? BevoLJ (talk) 23:52, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I will remove and replace with actual UN/ICC documentation until I can learn how to find an admin to review the page. BevoLJ (talk) 23:56, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Choking on their own genitalia"
Talk:Chris Eatough

message: Needs to be updated - currently only good through most of the 2008 season. I would recommend condensing it/reorganizing it, too - this guy has too many firsts, so his record looks bulky. Thanks from the MBTF. Andyo2000 (talk) 01:41, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Eatough's Record
Talk:Religion and schizotypy

message: This article has nothing to do with my point of view on matters, just to tell anyone who's interested, I saw a request on a user page for an articlee such as this so I made the preliminary version.
Ketrovin 18:39, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Nevertheless, I find that this more or less accurately describes the logical fallacy atheists use to attack my Faith on an ever constant basis.  Therefore, do not delete it but probably rename it and please do cite sources.  Reject 05:24, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  I am religious.
Talk:Image macro

message: the 'white impact text on the top and bottom of an image' format is nowhere near as popular now as it was a few years ago, and lolcats are pretty much dead at this point.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.79.61.67 (talk) 22:06, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dated 

message: The typical image macro has gone back much further than the internet, with examples like Harry Whittier Frees adding text to funny pictures of cats back in the early 1900s. That article even credits him as a precursor to lolcats, and seems relevant to this article. 68.49.47.134 (talk) 22:55, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original image macros 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Im in ur base killin ur d00dz. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Not a very active user (talk) 12:48, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Im in ur base killin ur d00dz" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bucket walrus. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Steel1943 (talk) 00:39, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Bucket walrus" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Socially awkward penguin. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Steel1943 (talk) 00:39, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Socially awkward penguin" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Town privileges

message: Isn't this essentially the same as Municipal charter? If so, they might be merged. If not, a link might be appropriate. DirkvdM 19:13, 5 August 2005 (UTC)

message: Civic rights redirects here. Is this correct? If so, are these the same civic rights mentioned in Liberty#Criticism? --Manscher 19:50, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Changed it to "civil rights." Robocracy 06:44, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe other references to civic rights suffer from the same problem. --Manscher 07:03, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Civic rights 

message: It isn't clear what these rights allowed a town to do or how places without these privileges functioned without them. For example: "in Sweden, the basic royal charter establishing a borough enabled trade, but not foreign trade". Are you saying that nobody could buy anything from anyone or sell anything to anyone if the place they lived didn't have town rights? This seems ludicrous and unworkable to me. What am I not getting? --Khajidha (talk) 15:40, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Read it, still don't get it
Talk:Bajwa

message: Removed copy-editing flag on 08 Dec 2015. Prose now flows better, and the statements that appear to be based only on myth have been qualified. Citation needed flag has been there over a year; a bolder person than me would just delete the lot. Darkerside (talk) 13:16, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Copy editing

message: The list of people needs to be sourced. In particular, those people who are living need to have a source that shows they self-identify as being a member of the Bajwa Jat clan, otherwise they will be removed per WP:BLP - see User:Sitush/Common#Castelists. - Sitush (talk) 07:14, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of people