lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Pitch class space

message: Sigh. This is what I apparently didn't have in mind when I posted the original research tag on Modulatory space.
The term "pitch class space" appears to have been coined on Wikipedia by Gene Ward Smith. While I think the term is perfectly reasonable, and both pitch class and pitch space are accepted terms, my sources on pitch space don't mention it once. Hyacinth 09:49, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What is going on here?  We have a reasonable article about an accepted music theoretical term?  Where is the original research?  I have sources (Boretz, "Meta Variations") using the term "pitch class space" that date back to 1972.  I'm removing the original research tag.  Tymoczko 14:38, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The tag is actually a request for you to cite or quote him. Hyacinth 18:56, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Original research
Talk:Fender Duo-Sonic

message: See Talk:Fender Musicmaster for discussion of which came first. Andrewa 21:13, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Priority

message: At first sight this looked like a good idea, as the histories and construction of the two are so obviously similar. If the Duo-Sonic had instead been called something like the Musicmaster Duo, the merge would be on IMO. But it wasn't, and a number of artists are identified as Duo-Sonic players rather than Musicmaster players, so on balance I think the merge just loses out. Andrewa 12:31, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with [[Musicmaster]]?

message: I believe that the photo of the Duo-Sonic II is actually a Fender Mustang. I am familiar with both guitars and while not huge there are differences. Pick guard shape and layout, also a slightly different body shape. Not wanting to be nit picky just trying to be accurate. 66.172.212.118 (talk) 22:43, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong picture
Talk:Kingston–Port Ewen Suspension Bridge

message: Info used in article construction:
*Kingston – Port Ewen Suspension Bridge is at 
google
From National Bridge Inventory:  
*ID#: 1007350, intersects: DOCK STREET, RONDOUT CRE,  location: 12.5MI N JCT RTS 9W+299
*Owner: State Highway Agency, Maintainer: same.  Toll: No
*Built: 1921. 
*Avg. daily traffic: 15,700 (1975)
*Material: Steel continous, Type: Suspension
*Main Span length: 323.6 meters = 1 061.67979 feet 
(thanks User:Cacophony for the NBI data) ++Lar: t/c 21:16, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tom Harpur

message: The link to Holding's article should probably be removed.  I've read it, and unfortunately it is very sloppy work and would probably drive more people into Harpur's corner.  I would welcome a decent critique of Harpur's The Pagan Christ (of the links here, I've so far only read Holding's), but Holding is not up to the task.  His effort is embarrassing.
:at my count there are currently seven links to critical reviews of harpur. I have been led to beleive that these links should be balanced. Unfortunatly there don't seem to be any positive reviews that I can find. I'll look around to find the most well written ones that I can and I'll put them up and take down some of the critical ones. Unless anyone has a problem.--Matt D (talk) 22:39, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with the above. In the interest of balance I've removed Holding's article. Following Wiki policy, I've removed one History New Network link, that of Barry Henaut, which not only appears to repost material under copyright, but is selective in what is included. Victoriagirl (talk) 00:40, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Casey's 2014 comments about Harpur's work indicate wide and scathing academic rejection of his best known book, a Critical reception section seems to be called for. In ictu oculi (talk) 07:10, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources
Talk:A Bittersweet Life

message: What is it with film articles lately?  The plot synopsis, according to WP's guidelines, is meant to be a paragraph, not the full film described in prose.  Geoff B 10:52, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: i agree, the synopsis while great is too long for wikipedia purposes Chensiyuan 02:40, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Plot]

message: Also, whats with all the original research? a lot of this article contains loaded words that distort to a singular point of view in this movie.--Dogsaint 08:19, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Original Research]

message: Introductory sentence is highly misleading, I guess the person who wrote that didn't 'get' the movie.188.195.145.181 (talk) 04:32, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: [Intro sentence]
Talk:Duma (2005 film)

message: I re-added the section comparing the movie to the book, which is the reason I became interesetd in this WP article in the first place.  This section was deleted Jul 2010 and had been tagged as needing sources in March 2010.  Considering that this section is a simple comparison based on the article on the book versus the article on the movie, are additional references really needed?  --Risacher (talk) 06:36, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it does require references. Making your own comparison between a book and a film (or a Wikipedia article on the book and the article on the film) and then adding that to Wikipedia is called original research, which is not allowed on Wikipedia. As some of the information also deals with living people references are a must. The book's article has six references, which may be a good starting point for references. - Kollision (talk) 01:28, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  comparison to book 

message: There are a few differences in the plot for the one I just finished watching here in South Africa. Like when Rip is trapped, Xan goes back and starts to dig him out uncovering his head, thus saving him. Xan then stops helping him and leaves because of the deception Xan believes is happening. There is nothing of the ventilation shaft but since the entrance is open that Xan left out of Rip could easily have left that way after digging him self out. The ending doesn't mention how mother and son meet on the family farm or flashes of Xan working on the farm.
These are just two things I noted, not sure if the edit was done differently for RSA than the USA or if the original article author just forgot a few things. Some how it feels like this has been written from the books perspective not the movie. Are corrections in order?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.151.220.246 (talk) 18:24, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Differences in plot
Talk:Applied mechanics

message: I have removed "Accredited academic programs" since almost all universities/schools around the world offer an accredited program of some kind. Including this section means listing all of these endless/countless programs.
Dr eng x (talk) 15:34, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Define 123.253.123.22 (talk) 04:23, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Applied mechanic
Talk:Air Crash Investigation

message: On the National Geographic Channel (US), this program is called "Air Emergency".  It is also referred to as "Air Emergency" on the National Geographic website.  Is "Air Crash Investigation" an older title of this program?  Vernon 23:03, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is the internationally recognized name of the title.  In Canada, where the series originates, both it and Crash Scene Investigation are referred to as simply Mayday, and these two series along with Blueprint for Disaster are known as Disaster Detectives. kelvSYC 03:40, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Title/Name of Program
Talk:WBXK-CA

message: As of March 29, 2013, WBXK's license has been deleted.
http://licensing.fcc.gov/cgi-bin/ws.exe/prod/cdbs/pubacc/prod/call_hist.pl?Facility_id=70422&Callsign=DWBXK-CA
Jeff S (talk) 02:13, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  LICENSE DELETED
Talk:Richard Hughes (British writer)

message: Is this the Richard Hughes who was Gresham Professor of Rhetoric in 1954? I've created a link from that page, but it would be nice to have this confirmed. JackyR 22:09, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, biography by Richard Perceval Graves, p.354. Charles Matthews 22:15, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Norman R. Augustine

message: It would be nice to find a public domain photograph (fotoguzzi)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.252.247.119 (talk) 23:11, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photograph? (This has been done--Thanks!!)

message: Augustine is listed as part of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences.
PDF of membership  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.252.247.119 (talk) 23:15, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  National Academy of Arts and Sciences? 

message: The graph used to illustrate Augustine's law has several problems, as I've pointed out on its Commons' talkpage, so it needs to be revised or removed. (PS. I'm pretty sure Augustine's law actually has merits, it's just that the accompanying graph is constructed from faulty data). Mojowiha (talk) 21:06, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Augustine's law]] may be correct, but the graph used to illustrate it surely isn't
Talk:Levy Mwanawasa

message: Levy? Is he Jewish? --80.230.199.17 22:24, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: since when is "lawyer" a religion?--Tainter 13:25, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  religion 

message: Is Banda still Acting President? Therequiembellishere (talk) 15:33, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Banda 

message: In the last revision I edited, I found duplicate named references, i.e. references sharing the same name, but not having the same content. Please check them, as I am not able to fix them automatically :) 
* "VOA" :
** James Butty, "Zambia's Ruling Party Is Not Seeking Mwanawasa's Replacement, Spokesman Said", VOA News, July 21, 2008.
** James Butty, "Zambian President Has Had a History of Hypertension, Says Information Minister", VOA News, July 2, 2008.
DumZiBoT (talk) 02:15, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bot report : Found duplicate references ! 

message: He has been named after a lot of things in Zambia such as stadium, hospital and school Nkonde mulenga (talk) 17:37, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legacy
Talk:Corneal topography

message: As a lay person with a truly spectacular optometric history, what I see missing here is "What is it useful for", a discussion of kerataconus, hard contact lenses and possibly laser surgery for myopia. Whilst I know the answers, I'm certainly not qualified to write them properly.
Graham, monocular diploplia...—Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.63.58.240 (talk • contribs) 
Thanks for your comment. The article can be expected to be expanded as time goes on, including more detail on the applications of the technique. You may find details you're looking for in the following articles:
* keratoconus
* contact lens
* LASIK and Photorefractive keratectomy
* monocular polyopia
I hope this helps. --BillC 17:22, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:WRBJ-TV

message: WRBJ → WRBJ-TV — To permit the creation of a disambiguation page at WRBJ for WRBJ-TV and WRBJ-FM —Dravecky (talk) 11:45, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: Roberts Broadcasting has run into bad luck with its TV stations lately… after recent deletions of WAZE-TV and WZRB, the Federal Communications Commission has now yanked WRBJ's license (PDF) for not filing for a license to cover its post-transition facilities.  That's the same factor that resulted in the WAZE and WZRB licenses disappearing… and as usual, not being in the Jackson market, an update as to WRBJ's on-air status is requested.  --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:06, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: By the way, if it's an indication of anything, WRBJ's website is definitely closed… there's no content at all now.  Granted, that by itself doesn't mean much — but then again, this is a Roberts station… --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:16, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind, WRBJ (and WZRB, but not WAZE-TV) have been uncanceled… (though the station's site is now even more defunct than it was in April, as it has now expired!)  --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:35, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update needed — WRBJ deleted 

message: Roberts Broadcasting will sell WRBJ-TV to TBN.
http://www.clarionledger.com/article/20121023/BIZ/310230036/Roberts-brothers-TV-station-new-hands
Jeff S (talk) 08:19, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roberts Broadcasting sells WRBJ-TV to TBN
Talk:Politics of the Bailiwick of Guernsey

message: There should probably be a list of parishes on the article page. AnonMoos 22:38, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

message: I wonder if people have seen this article -  Guernsey to discuss severing link with UK. The Telegraph is claiming that the States is considering severing what links it has with the UK, and possibly federating with Jersey (probably the most sensible option in some ways). Presumably Guernsey would retain the English monarchy, but fall into a dominion type position. --MacRusgail 16:23, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Guernsey to discuss severing link with UK

message: The structure of the government has changed in May 2016. See https://gov.gg/statesreviewcommittee. The section "Policy Council" should be replaced with a new section containing information about the new structure. 92.201.58.29 (talk) 07:52, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  New structure of Government since May 2016 

message: This article does not distinguish clearly between unelected positions and elected ones.
Also there is very little about the relationship with Alderney, and nothing I could see about Sark.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.78.2.179 (talk) 10:38, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Couple of issues
Talk:Volkswagen Group

message: Hi. Has anyone noticed the contradictory claims and citations regarding Volkswagen ownership? In the article summary, the company is quoted with a 12.7% ownership and a corresponding 20% voting rights, yet User:BilCat wants to convert that specific fact to a generalized assertion that the government of Lower Saxony has a 20% share ownership. Throughout the article, the distinction is made between actual share ownership by the Government of Lower Saxony, and its correspondence in voting rights. However, User:BilCat, seems unable to make that distinction and overrides my edit requesting a citation regarding the share ownership change that he is proposing without a citation, through his inability to distinguish share ownership and voting rights. I don't want to get into an edit fight, but the failure to make that distinction is clearly wrong. If the government of Lower Saxony has changed its share ownership to 20% (from the 11 or 12% as cited in 2 instances of the article), along with retaining a 20% voting rights, than User:BilCat's assertion would be true, but it would still need a citation to support that change and that conclusion. And at this point that change is not cited in the article anywhere. Please help before this becomes an edit war... Stevenmitchell (talk) 19:39, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Why are you adding citation needed tags if you've already read the sources and know what the correct information is, instead of just correcting the incorrect information? BilCat (talk) 20:33, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Since it's contradictory and unsourced, I simply removed it. I don't know why you couldn't have done that yourself, with a suitable edit summary, but whatever. Is it fixed now, or is there some other issue remaining which you haven't mentioned yet?  BilCat (talk) 20:39, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Volkswagen Ownership 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Volkswagen Industrial Motor and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 5#Volkswagen Industrial Motor until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  ilmaisin (talk) 02:00, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Volkswagen Industrial Motor" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: Bugatti has been added back as a brand of Volkswagen Group. However, news reports state that RIMAC bought Bugatti from Volkswagen in 2021. Porsche now owns a minority stake, also. The Volkswagen Group's website no longer includes Bugatti on their list of brands here. Re-adding Bugatti to the website should be discussed on the talk page first based on references like these. Bahooka (talk) 01:07, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Volkswagen Group and Bugatti
Talk:Jan Udo Holey

message: The actual english version is a little single edged. Could be best to take the spanish version wich is very appropriate and translate it. 
I can read spanish quite fluently, but I fear I'm not able to do a good translation into english. So I hope, another one takes the burden. Foreigner 15:19, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Take the Spanish version and adapt it
Talk:1 Corinthians 11

message: I wrote mostly on the Bushnell view because that's what I know best. Please balance the views! --JBJ830726 22:58, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV

message: Info on the Bushnell view taken straight from her book here.  A summary of the issue is here. --JBJ 04:35, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I mean the info has been summarized straight from her book, not copied. I was only citing my sources. Only her translation is a quote (with some parantheticals removed). FYI the book is public domain anyway. I would have appreciated more discussion before slapping up a copyright violation template. --JBJ 15:13, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: I disagree with the merge because 
#There is already precedent for books of the Bible has individual pages, including 1 Cor
#All the reasons for merging  on Wikipedia:Merging and moving pages do not apply here (it seems). 
#Someone clicking a link to 1 cor 11 wants to read about 1 Cor 11, not neccessarily Christian feminism. Your thoughts? --Ephilei 22:52, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging to [[Feminist Christianity]] 

message: Found this alternative view for 1 Cor 11
https://www.jstor.org/stable/3268550?seq=1
The article(s) are summarized by this scholar in this video:
https://youtube.com/YrdC6D-tmos?t=3825
Maybe someone would be generous enough to check over these and potentially write on the main.
tl;dr - head covering - hair could be seen as a sex organ because of how the word in NT text is also used in Greek medical texts.
--79.116.103.76 (talk) 03:19, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Woman's headcovering extra view
Talk:Fuzzy game

message: This really has nothing to do with things like fuzzy matrix games, right?  It also is very different from the fuzzy game described by Butnariu (~1979), as well as the recent work on fuzzy games and linear programing methods for finding equilibria by authors such as Nishizaki and Sakawa, etc.  But the term fuzzy game means something different in CGT from what it means to these other authors.  I'm planning on changing the begining of the article to express this and add some info on the research of this type of fuzzy game soon, if noone has any argument.  Let me know, though. Smmurphy(Talk) 19:45, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  fuzzy matrix game 

message: A significant portion of this article referred to "articles" that the reader should be familiar with. I removed this, as it seemed self referential, and generally not in the style of WP. --Beefyt 01:11, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  self-referential content 

message: This really is completely different from fuzzy logic. It just so happens to have the word Fuzzy in it. Fuzzy logic and a fuzzy game are completely different. I removed the catagory thingy.58.106.37.217 23:50, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fuzzy logic?
Talk:Bill Lawrence (TV producer)

message: On the commentary track of episode 1 of season 1, when "Written by BILL LAWRENCE" appears on the bottom left, Bill says "Bill Lawrence, that is my stage name". So what is his real name? DidYouLoseASock 23:04, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think he was just kidding, his full name is probably William Lawrence, though. I think his son is called William, so he's probably named after Bill. Mullerbaby 23:02, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

text: His full name is William Van Duzer Lawrence IV. Cf. Lois Smith Brady,  Weddings: Vows; Christa Miller, William Lawrence IV, The New York Times, 5 December 1999. – Jondor 21:37, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: His real name?

message: Why does it say atleast 7 season of scrubs? thats totally unconfirmed.
Confirmed now by the offical scrubs site. 82.45.55.120 19:19, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scrubs 

message: The show was in a horrible state and I've given it a rewrite. I'm a pretty terrible writer and I'm not totally knowledgeable on all of his sitcoms so I'd appreciate it if someone would flesh it out -86.155.137.48 (talk) 02:00, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup
Talk:Greater Springfield, Queensland

message: To my knowledge the development is not known simply as Springfield. However, there need not be two pages on the one specific area so I am proposing a merger or sorts, resulting in a redirect from one page to the other, whichever is decided to be the more correct page name. Ansell 02:42, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Merging discussion is ongoing here: Talk:Springfield, Queensland#Requested move 27 August 2015. Vanjagenije (talk) 20:36, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with [[Springfield, Queensland]]

message: New to this so not sure if I am doing this right...this seems to be the main page for the Greater Springfield city of which Springfield,_Queensland is a suburb of (see map of area). Considering that there isn't much available on the Springfield,_Queensland page, and what it does mention is also on the Greater Springfield, Queensland page, shouldn't it be merged? Furthermore, wouldn't it be better to have the city as the main page rather than the suburb (as has been done in previous mergers) because the city has expanded so much since the 2006 merge?
Previous conversations regarding mergers is available here for further discussion points. Luna.Maree (talk) 23:12, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: We have this situation all the time. We have Brisbane (the town) and Brisbane City (the suburb). We have Maroochydore (urban area) and Maroochydore (suburb). We have Buderim (the urban area) and Buderim (suburb). So we have the same situation here - one article Greater Springfield, Queensland that should address the big issues of the masterplanned community as a whole and another Springfield, Queensland that addresses the specific suburb within Greater Springfield. Now obviously there will be some overlap in these situations (e.g. if a key piece of big picture infrastructure happens to be located in the central suburbs, it may get mentioned in both articles), but generally there are differences. The population of Greater Springfield is clearly different to that of Springfield, its boundaries are different etc. Greater Springfield has a state high school and a university campus but the suburb of Springfield doesn't (they are in the suburb of Springfield Central). Naturally the article on Greater Springfield should name and link to all the articles for the individual suburbs and conversley the articles for the individual suburbs should say they are part of the Greater Springfield masterplan (I believe this is already the case). Kerry (talk) 07:44, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger Proposal with [[Springfield, Queensland]]