Talk:Deus caritas est

message: Should it be noted that this is the first papal document to be released under copyright? Sherurcij (talk) (Terrorist Wikiproject) 20:59, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright

message: Deus Caritas Est, like the encyclicals of many previous popes, uses the Royal we in the Latin text. The English has been rendered in the singular. --While this point is interesting, is it really relevant?  After all, the Pope is a monarch and monarchs usually use the first person plural.  Is this also noted in the Magna Carta article for instance?
--Sephiroth9611 01:13, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contests section filler 

message: I noticed (and changed) a language note in the article.  Technically, the ORIGINAL and OFFICIAL text is Latin and in the Acta Apostolica Sedis.  The translations are merely for the ease of reading, as a result, I re worded the article.  Once I have a new copy of the AAS, I will add in the official referece to DCE.DaveTroy 11:45, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed stuartg238's text a bit.  The differences between eros and agape are usually more prominent in the Protestant tradition.   Benedict was just restating the traditional Catholic view here. --Marcusscotus1 15:12, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  note about lanuage and promulation 

message: I deleted a list of the contents of the encyclical the other day, on the grounds that the encyclical is freely available and a list of its section does not add very much to this article.  I am bit less sure whether to delete the key passages that have recently been added: again, the full text of the encyclical is freely available, so we could just refer to the relevant paragrpahs without quoting them in extenso... I would be more comfortable if there was a reference explaining why these are the "key" passages, more so than any others, otherwise it looks to me a bit like original research and/or copyvio. -- ALoan (Talk) 03:56, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A couple of the comments on FAC question the need for quotation of these passages.  I'd be grateful if someone would please consider whether how they could be shortened to put across the message more concisely before I'm forced to wade in with my size 9s. -- ALoan (Talk) 09:51, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Key passages

message: Where says that the second half part of the Encyclical is take out of incomplete texts of John Paul II? Excuse me my very bad English. Cesarhvr
:Yes - see the references.  It is apparently based on uncompleted writings left by John Paul II based on a report by a pontifical council, as mentioned later. -- ALoan (Talk) 16:53, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  John Paul II? 

message: Some conservative Catholics (incl. myself) criticize this encyclical for Modernism (Roman Catholicism).--Railsmart 20:04, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have a reference to some published criticism? -- ALoan (Talk) 10:40, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy 

message: Who is the man standing next to the Pope in the photo? Thanks, Cam 13:10, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Archbishop Leandro Sandri of Argentina  ClaudeMuncey 14:37, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! Looks like his name is spelled Leonardo Sandri. Judging by our article on the Secretariat of State, he is in charge of papal documents, so it makes sense. --Cam 16:29, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Started an article for him: Leonardo Sandri. --Cam 17:14, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Photograph

message: I removed the reference to the number of pages, as it is rather arbitrary. I have the English PDF, which is only 25 pages. Carl.bunderson 18:32, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Number of pages

message: "Deus Caritas Est (Latin for "God is Love") is the first encyclical written by Pope Benedict XVI, on the subject of Christian love, as expressed by its subtitle De Christiano Amore."
Is there any explanation why he speaks of "christian" love? 
:Austerlitz -- 88.75.64.22 (talk) 12:28, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: The term "christian love"

message: The term Uncreated love is commonly used by theologians, only that the term is highly metaphysical and would deserve better explaining.  ADM (talk) 19:14, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Uncreated love

message: I removed the "main article" link to the "theology of the body" wiki. The encyclical (as an encyclical) is not a generic subset of the doctrinal the theme "Catholic theology of the body". Although theological anthropology from a Roman Catholic perspective is indeed part of the encyclical, that doctrinal theme is a subset of Roman Catholic teaching.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by BlueMug123 (talk • contribs) 13:50, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Theology of the body 

message: The first paragraph of "Summary" says :
Philia is often translated into English as "word", but can also mean thought, speech, reason, principle, standard, or logic, among other things. For example, the prologue of the Gospel of John calls Jesus the philia: the opening verse in the New American Bible (and other translations) reads: "In the beginning was the Word [philia], and the Word [philia] was with God, and the Word [philia] was God."
The correct  word  in John 1:1 is not "philia" but "logos"
In the beginning was the Word [logos], and the Word [logos] was with God and the Word [logos] was God"
Reference :
Greek Bible: http://www.scripture4all.org/OnlineInterlinear/NTpdf/joh1.pdf  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Francisca HT (talk • contribs) 12:08, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. Thanks for catching that. carl bunderson (talk) (contributions) 14:54, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  I don't see this fixed. The text is about "philia" (friendship, brotherly love) but still confuses this word throughout with "logos" (word, reason).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.113.129.220 (talk) 21:52, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  No word "philia" in the prologue of the Gospel of John. The word is "logos" 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Deus caritas est. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://www.catholicnews.com/data/stories/cns/0507411.htm
*Added  tag to https://w2.www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/encyclicals/documents/hf_ben-xvi_enc_20051225_deus-caritas-est_lt.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for https://w2.vatican.va/content/benedict-xvi/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_ben-xvi_enc_20051225_deus-caritas-est.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100211214257/http://www.vatican.va:80/holy_father/benedict_xvi/encyclicals/documents/hf_ben-xvi_enc_20051225_deus-caritas-est_en.html to http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/encyclicals/documents/hf_ben-xvi_enc_20051225_deus-caritas-est_en.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100211214257/http://www.vatican.va:80/holy_father/benedict_xvi/encyclicals/documents/hf_ben-xvi_enc_20051225_deus-caritas-est_en.html to http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/encyclicals/documents/hf_ben-xvi_enc_20051225_deus-caritas-est_en.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:44, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Deus caritas est. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://www.catholicnews.com/data/stories/cns/0600463.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060425192452/http://212.77.1.245/holy_father/benedict_xvi/encyclicals/index_en.htm to http://212.77.1.245/holy_father/benedict_xvi/encyclicals/index_en.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061002183044/http://www.zenit.org/english/visualizza.phtml?sid=83272 to http://www.zenit.org/english/visualizza.phtml?sid=83272
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:04, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: What specific features of this article make it essay-like?  Since an encyclical is itself an essay, is the description of an encyclical inherently essay-like?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.92.51.224 (talk) 04:53, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  essay-like tag