lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Battle of Adwa

message: I invite IP 2A00:23C4:6214:FA01:0:0:0:0/64 to discuss their preferred edits here rather than edit warring. Only a talk page consensus can result in the re-addition of disputed content. This appears to be a misunderstanding of the norms regarding info boxes. See MOS:INFOBOXPURPOSE for advice, also discussed by  above. Generalrelative (talk) 17:07, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: are you trying to insult me with that reply you need to stop being a fool of yourself and as you can clearly see that it says they were COMMANDERS and COMMANDED in the battle of adwa, i suggest you stop speaking before i absolutely destroy you if you want to get into a debate and i highly recommend you stop undo-ing or i swear upon god i will report you to your authorities. Thanks. DrNiko giannispolous (talk) 17:50, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disputed edits 

message: the battle of adwa 196.189.113.133 (talk) 06:06, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  social studies 

message: Change:
"The Ethiopian forces defeated the Italian invading force on Sunday 1 March 1896, near the town of Adwa."
To:
"Ethiopian forces, including civilian combatants and logistics units, defeated the Italian invading force on Sunday 1 March 1896, near the town of Adwa."
Citation: 
The Battle of Adwa: reflections on Ethiopia's historic victory against European colonialism. New York: Algora Publishing, 2005. Pp. 320.
Change:
"At the Battle of Adwa, Ethiopian fighters from all parts of the country rallied to the cause and took up positions on the battlefield that allowed them to come to each other's aid during combat."
To:
"At the Battle of Adwa, Ethiopian fighters from all parts of the country rallied to the cause and took up positions on the battlefield that allowed them to come to each other's aid during combat. Ethiopia did not have a national army but a strong patriotic and military tradition meant all able-bodied men answered the call for combat."
Citation: 
Raymond A. Jonas, The Battle of Adwa: African Victory in the Age of Empire. Cambridge:
Harvard Univ. Press, 2011. Pp. 413. Oabera (talk) 06:39, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the  template. Furthermore, the additions appear to be POV-pushing. (courtesy ping User:Oabera) HouseBlastertalk 19:48, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 26 August 2023 

message: Why is the English language name for this battle missing from the article?
Until the invention of Wikipedia, there was no place called Adwa in English.
142.205.202.71 (talk) 19:34, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Battle of Adowa
Talk:Soyuz 28

message: the last chapter is totally wrong: most, if not all "Interkosmos" cosmonauts (mostly military pilots)spoke excellent russian because they studied in the USSR for some years, alos russian was the official language of the Warsaw pact and used exclusive on civil and military aircrafts. especially cosmonauts from slavic nations like Czech Republic or Slovacia can learn and speak russian very easily because the languages are very much related --Henristosch 21:15, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  training and russian 
Talk:Pope Eugene IV

message: I believe the Latin version of this pope's name is Eugenius, Eugene being an Anglicization. Since the popes were based in Italy (not England) and church business was conducted in Latin, I have changed the name to the Latin version. --Iacobus 00:48, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: D'oh! I'll do that once I learn the protocol for renaming articles. --Iacobus 00:48, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming 

message: The main page says that Eugene IV was never guilty of nepotism. However, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cardinal-nephews lists two nephews whom he created as cardinal-nephews, one of whom (elsewhere) was allegedly his own son. 
The sanitised version on this main page should be corrected.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.149.75.207 (talk) 07:47, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nepotism 
Talk:Charlie Chaplin

message: In "Monsieur Verdoux and communist accusations" It talks about "The FBI wanted him out of the country, and launched an official investigation in early 1947.", and then goes on to talk about "Chaplin received a subpoena to appear before the House Un-American Activities Committee, like it was done after the FBI launched the investigation. But the subpoena was in 1941... well before the investigation. It also leave out the reason for the subpoena, which was his speech in his movie the Great Dictator, that the Committee felt sounded "Un-American".Shion-ko (talk) 01:45, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Monsieur Verdoux and communist accusations is.. misleading
Talk:List of people from Seattle

message: It would be easier to find someone if the lists were alphabetized. If someone's up to it... --Acid Ammo 19:54, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Alphabetizing

message: This section doesn't list fictional Seattleites it just shows various movies and programs that take place in Seattle. Someone please change the list of think of a better title.
--AirLiner 22:06, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Renamed, though I'm still not sure this section belongs in the article. CAVincent (talk) 01:39, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fictional Seattleites

message: A page similar to this one. List of people from San Francisco, is currently under review as an article for deletion, for reasons which would apply to this article as well.  I am conducting an RfC on the talk page of the above-mentioned list to determine whether the concensus agrees on keeping such lists or not.  Any and all comments are more than welcome.  Badbilltucker 16:25, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for Comment 

message: I just pruned the "born in Seattle" section and edited the intro to clarify that this list is intended to include only people from within Seattle city limits. If we want a list of people from the metro area, we should either start a new list or rename this one. Thoughts? (I could also see ditching this list and using categories, frankly, so if someone wants to do that I'd probably be on board as well.) -- Scarequotes 16:12, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "Born in Seattle" pruned again, and some non-notables deleted. CAVincent 14:07, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "From Seattle" 

message: I came here looking for the history of the word "Seattleite", but I got a short definition and a list of names. However...I couldn't find any articles on the word through a search (excepting urbandictionary.com), so I'm throwing this out there. One thing urban dictionary brought up was the stereotype of a seattleite (rain, coffee, "hippness"), which may be interesting. - malisa (talk) 01:17, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  History of the word vs. List 

message: "Dead" should be changed to "Deceased". This is an encyclopedia after all.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.20.86.114 (talk) 20:02, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Dead"? 

message: I've been applying a rule that people included on this page be at least notable enough to have a wikipedia article, and keeping this rule pretty fast. Does anyone seriously object to this? I ask because an anon editor has started edit warring with me to include some individuals who lack their own articles (although in fairness may in fact be notable enough to have articles if someone got around to creating them - I don't know enough to judge). I'm curious what others think, so I'll stop reverting at least for a period. CAVincent (talk) 04:03, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criteria for Inclusion - Notability 

message: The movie, "The Little Buddha" takes place in Seattle, and should be included in the fictional Seattle section.  71.231.178.207 (talk) 02:25, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The little buddha
Talk:Soft gamma repeater

message: The third para talks about observations of the first SGB. The next para seems to suggest that others would need to be known, in order to fill "soft gamma repeaters". Does anyone have other examples that might be mentioned? Neat article BTW. Maury 21:07, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  More examples? 
Talk:Euphorbia esula

message: I'm not a biologist and would hope someone with a better knowledge of this will create the proper page from this. Being from Colorado, I've seen bumper stickers about "Fighting Leafy Spurge" and decided it needed an article. -- Decumanus 05:27, 6 Mar 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: It an invasive species to North America and as an invasive grass, it does not taste pleasant to cattle and this economic reason is the reason why it is "more commonly known as" "Leafy Spurge" in English. In this case, I suggest that it be renamed.--75.37.29.140 (talk) 04:26, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename suggestion
Talk:Savannah (steamboat)

message: er....what famous voyage? Kingturtle 05:42, 6 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Famous voyage

message: If she only used her steam engine on 18 days, how's she first steamship to make the crossing? Seems like she ought to actually be under steam...like the Canadian Royal William was, in 1831...  (OK, I'm a bit national chauvinist...) (Built, I also note, by Moson at Montreal...) Trekphiler 20:36, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Since the claim remains, I tagged it.   Trekphiler (talk) 01:03, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Steamship?

message: I have no problem with a article about "the first steamship to cross the Atlantic though not entirely by steam."  This IS a "famous" voyage, in my experience:  motive power notwithstanding, Savannah is more widely noticed that Curacao or Royal William, though they deserve at least equal acclaim.  There must be a reason that the nuclear ship Savannah was not named the nuclear ship Curacao.
What's new to me is the other claim, that this was the largest passenger ship.  No tonnage is listed.
Eugene W. Smith's Passenger Ships of the World (pp.239-40) gives Savannah only 319 tons.  Are we really to believe that nothing bigger was afloat, and if so, on what evidence?
Smith also says, BTW, that she used her engines for a total of four days.
Terry J. Carter (talk) 00:59, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the "World's largest passenger ship" navbox. There is nothing in any of the sources I've seen to indicate that Savannah ever qualified for this distinction, and I don't think it's the sort of thing a reliable source would be likely to omit. Gatoclass (talk) 05:22, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There was still a link to Savannah from the "World's largest passenger ship" succession box at SS Royal William.  I've removed it. --Colin Douglas Howell (talk) 20:31, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Largest?
Talk:Lerman Dragutin

message: ... to Lerman Dragutin instead of Dragutin Lerman?  All other references in articles are to the latter, which is the way the page was titled originally (I saw that the other was blanked out & reinstated the text there before I found this page; now the text is in 2 places).  Since all edits are being done by an anonymous user with a different ID every time, I have no way of contacting this person and finding out what the intention is. There is no explanation in either place.  We certainly don't need or want both pages. Anyone have a clue what might be behind this?   Elf 05:59, 6 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Why did title change?
Talk:Roe v. Wade

message: Parts of the article still speak of the effects of overturning Roe v. Wade as a hypothetical. Language like "if Roe v. Wade were/is overturned" needs to be fixed. 2604:3D09:7B80:CC0:F8E8:D71B:D5B5:9A68 (talk) 01:50, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Certain Sections are Out of Date 

message: in the states that allow abortion with a doctor decree there 5 states and it says that there is only 4 Profeshinal amichure (talk) 02:04, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. — Urro[talk][edits] 14:21, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 26 January 2024 

message: Typo: change "sais" under "Reception > Later responses by those involved > Norma McCorvey" to "said." G.S.C. 62 (talk) 16:30, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. Jamedeus (talk) 17:12, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 9 April 2024
Talk:Island of California

message: How was this belief held "from medieval times" up through the 18th century? Had Europeans even reached California in medieval times? Meelar 06:50, 6 Mar 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Good question. I think it began in 1510, which is late Medieval times by some definitions. It's a little confusing, however, and I'm in the process of rewriting it based on some better info I've gotten.Decumanus 06:56, 6 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: The references in this text need to be complemented by in-line citations, currently there are several turns of phrase, which, when not accompanied by proper citations indicate original research. Fenix down (talk) 15:30, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Original Research

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:California island Vinckeboons5.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on September 14, 2010. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2010-09-14. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! howcheng  {chat} 21:46, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:California island Vinckeboons5.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon 

message: What about the allegedly secret voyage of Sir Francis Drake. If secret, then his discoveries were not shared with other non-British government cartographers. Reference the material in Francis Drake.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.121.204.129 (talk) 17:48, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Drake's voyage 

message: Should we not include historical floods which actually may have turned california into a temporary island every few hundred years? This much is fact, but is not mentioned in the article:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_flood_of_1605
This historic flood would match the time that Juan de Oñate made an expedition to the west coast in 1605, the very same year as the flood was reported to have occurred. 
Something to think about.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Camdoodlebop (talk • contribs) 07:03, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical floods: Food for thought 

message: — Assignment last updated by Firefly200002 (talk) 21:10, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: CALIFORNIA DREAMING, THE GOLDEN STATE'S RHETORICAL APPEALS
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Maps/Archive1

message: I'd like to have the maps on WP to be more standardized. As all countries have a standard location map, and the provinces of Vietnam use the same colors as in the country maps, I did create a new template for the Thai province locator maps. I'd like to hear of comments which one would be the preferred one. For comparison see the following two:
 
andy 19:02, 8 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion from "Wikipedia talk:Wikiproject Thai provinces"

message: by Snoyes
:This style should be the standard. It's already the most prevalent. --Wik 18:30, Feb 21, 2004 (UTC)
::I disagree. First, the shades of green are too similar. The highlighted area color should be contrasting. Second, I prefer that there should be surrounding context (seas, adjacent land territories) rather than a sea of white (such as the one done on Aceh, Indonesia; Covasna, Romania; Texas, US; and Cainta, Rizal, Philippines. --seav 20:34, Feb 21, 2004 (UTC)
::Did you take the 150 german districts into account? Those use the yellow-brown colorization as well. And I don't think we should define the standard just by what is now most common - we should define it by what looks best to the majority, has no problems for color-blind people, can display the information most clearly. Of course the work to change existing maps should be considerated - but as long as it is just changing colors it is IMHO not the main factor. (and after the edit conflict) And as Seav said the sorrounding territories are also nice, unless it is a complete island country. andy 20:39, 21 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Caprivi, Namibia
Talk:Mohammad-Reza Bahonar

message: The first page of Shargh, on 16 Esfand 1382 has some good information about both Bahonars (in Persian).  Roozbeh 07:45, 6 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Goh Chok Tong

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/goh-chok-tong-biography-standing-tall-book-14018792. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  – robertsky (talk) 15:26, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: Hello  Both of us have been reverting each other on the issue of the ESM title over the last few months. I feel we should probably discuss our respective reasons and perhaps involve other editors in this.
ESM is just an honorary post granted to Goh Chok Tong, very much similar to Minister Mentor to Lee Kuan Yew. Even though it's not a cabinet title, I have seen no indication that it's an honorific prefix. For example, source rarely add His Excellency and The Honourable when referring to individuals. You do not see this in ST, CNA, or any news media articles.
But they do attach the title of one's position such as Prime Minister/Finance Minister/Leader of the Opposition. This makes Emeritus Senior Minister just like any government position. No other article adds the current position to the honorific prefix field. Seloloving (talk) 10:05, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  ESM title
Talk:Logo

message: There's logotype, isotype, imagotype, and isologo. Source: https://lorartist.com/do-you-know-the-difference-between-logo-isotype-imagotype-and-isologo
Wikipedia has no articles about any of those, and this article never mentions any of those Rudxain (talk) 22:26, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other kinds of branding
Talk:Touch (command)

message: Maybe we should reconsider the date and time in the examples?  It seems kind of morbid. 'Net 22:51, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Changed.--Unixguy 10:32, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Examples 

message: Is there a Windows cmd under DOS that does the same thing? 65.65.71.253 (talk) 16:45, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: windows version

message: Isn't the # a prompt for the superuser?  I'd think it should be a $, the prompt for normal users in Bourne shells.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by BZRatfink (talk • contribs) 01:55, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. I did not see your comment before editing the page, but I have changed it to $. Excessive use of the root account is very common in hobbyist Linux users, but far less so by professional system admins, especially those who first learned their skills on true Unix operating systems like AIX, HP-UX, Solaris etc. Drkirkby (talk) 09:14, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prompt in Examples Section 

message: Many of the examples given will not work on Solaris, which is a certified Unix operating system. The reason for this is that many of the examples are making use of GNU extensions, which are not in the Unix standard. Here is the specification of touch http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/7990989775/xcu/touch.html 
I will remove the non-standard examples.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.145.45.146 (talk) 20:08, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  This does not describe the Unix touch command
Talk:Charles Edward Jones

message: This page was placed on Votes for Deletion in March and again in June 2004. Consensus both times was to keep; view discussion for March below and for June at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/more_911_victims_2.  Also was subject to a  Votes for Deletion  in June 2005, which can be found at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Charles Edward Jones
*Another September 11 death. Adam Bishop 06:08, 4 Mar 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: which says: Here are some suggested wordings Anthony DiPierro 18:04, 11 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: Keep: Average Earthman, Oliver Pereria, Anthony DiPierro
Delete: Secretlondon, Wile E. Heresiarch, Dissident
:This would normally be sufficient to keep the article and remove from vfd, but I thought it would be fair to let it a run a day or two more to see if those that originally voted delete have an opinion now. Pete/Pcb21 (talk) 08:47, 12 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Votes made after article extended around 7pm 4th March

message: This, despite the watermark, appears to be an official USAF Photo of Col. Jones, and thus should be public domain, I'd think? - The Bushranger One ping only 06:45, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  PD Photograph? 