lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Domain

message: I have been adding additional entries to this disambiguation page. However, not all articles that contain the word "domain" in their name should be included. I am even unsure of some of the entries I have added and may remove them later. -- Kjkolb (talk) 11:47, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: On quick perusal, the only one I found really objectionable was 'field of study'. I can't think of any reason to search for an academic discipline under 'domain'. Kbrose (talk) 18:56, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for your input. I added more entries and removed at least one. I have exhausted the methods at my disposal to find additional entries. I doubt there are more than a couple legitimate entries that have been overlooked. I think the focus should now be on removing any inappropriate entries and rearranging entries, if necessary. I went with an alphabetized arrangement due to the size of the list. I prefer to put the entries a searcher is most likely looking for at the top, but I think such an arrangement may actually make things harder to find in this case. Anyway, I think that I am done working on this disambiguation page. Those that come later may find Wikipedia:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages) useful. -- Kjkolb (talk) 11:47, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Additions
Talk:Roberto Baldazzini

message: It's unfortunate that we still have so many orphan articles in Wikipedia. Something must be done. Perhaps there should be a link to Kevin Bacon in every one of them. -The Gnome (talk) 05:48, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: "Orphan" article

message: — Assignment last updated by Ktrachsel01 (talk) 01:08, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Graphic Design History
Talk:List of programs broadcast by Intercontinental Broadcasting Corporation

message: I came across this page when I was disambiguating This Is It. I realize now (if I'm not mistaken) that all the items in this list are television programmes but there isn't even a hint as to (a) what kind of programmes they are, or (b) what "Local shows" means. There isn't even a proper introductory paragraph to this list; before I created one, there wasn't even a link to Intercontinental Broadcasting Corporation at the top of the page. <KF> 01:21, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Second Mexican War

message: It's not clear enough that this "war" is purely fiction. The whole page reads like a real war. If I hadn't just finished reading the book, and knew a lot about history, I would think that this actually happened. -- unsigned
I have attempted to address this by modifying the first sentence of the article to conform to Manual of Style (writing about fiction) -- Example Articles -- Miscellaneous, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_%28writing_about_fiction%29. 199.64.0.252 21:01, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Arrested Development/Archive 2

message: In the article brief overview of the characters, it states that Steve Holt is GOB's son.  This is true, but I'm concerned about people who might be starting with the DVDs before they launch into the current season and so forth.  To them this info would be a spoiler, since it is something of a twist in the second season.ProfessorFokker 08:26, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, I replaced that with something more general. The Job/Steve Holt connnection is discussed further on in greater detail in the plot summary section for those wanting more information. --TheMidnighters 09:48, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. ProfessorFokker 05:14, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Steve Holt!!!

message: Does anyone know where to find it?  I've been looking for it everywhere.  Its the disco theme that's played on the stereo whenever the Hot Cops arrive.  Its featured prominently twice in "Pier Pressure" (once when G.O.B. is in the cop uniform, the second time on the pier during the drug bust). -- Bubbachuck 09:26, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hot Cops theme 

message: I added a plot summary for the final four episodes of Season 3.  It makes the Season 3 summary section much longer than the first two.  Perhaps someone should try their hand at condensing the Season 3 information?  I like the show too much to want to cut anything out.  :-)  Vslashg 07:17, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added Season 3 info 

message: There are several sections in this page that are irrelevant now. Ron Howard, Presented like a documentary?, character lost, question, Location of series, External links (SaveOurBluths.org), S.O.B.'s has an entire paragraph?, Disbarred, and Steve Holt!!! have all been resolved. Again, I'd like to alter this, but I don't want it reverted. Thoughts? Dudewhiterussian 08:24, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's wikipedia policy to never delete talk page discussions even after resolution. That way if the same/similar argument ever arises you can refer to past discussions. Archiving talk pages are possible but I'm not sure if this talk page is long enough to merit it yet. --TheMidnighters 09:17, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Talk page needs cleaned up 

message: ok...I could've sworn the title of Episode 2, Season 3 was "The British Bombshell", but apparently it was changed to "For British Eyes Only" at the last minute before broadcast.  My source for that is the excellent AD site, the Balboa Observer-Picayune at http://www.the-op.com.  My apologies to whoever I edited over and I'll change it back now ka1iban 16:16, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  British Bombshell/For British Eyes Only
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Brain in a vat

message: I think it is important for Wikipedia to have an entry on the Brain-in-a-vat argument.
This is an important 20th (and 21st) century rendition of this venerable argument form.
So the fact that the BIV argument has close ties to other such arguments is not a
reason for deleting it, but rather a reason for keeping it.
Edietrich2002 01:32, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Soldier settlement (Australia)

message: I am unfamiliar with how the schemes operated in the other states, but in Western Australia, the post-World War I Soldier Settlement Scheme was later taken over by the Group Settlement Scheme and together these had a major impact on the fabric of Western Australian Society, and in particular, settlement of rural areas in the state.   In 1919, the Overseas Settlement Committee was setup and headed by Winston Churchill.  And before that, in 1916, Sir Rider Haggard was sent on a tour of southern Africa and all of the Australian states, presumably by the British Colonial Office to ascertain their capacity and interest in taking British migrants.  
J.P. Gabbedy's two volume book 'Group Settlement' is an excellent resource on both the SS scheme as well as the the GSS in WA.  The latter has long been in my to-do list.  —Moondyne 02:49, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment 

message: * http://www.jcu.edu.au/aff/history/articles/keneley2.htm looks a good and authoritative source for info.  I have to skedaddle right now so can't contribute today. Regards --Golden Wattle  talk 22:27, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source for Victorian Western District WW1 

message: There's no page called Soldier settlement on Wikipedia, so why is this page named Soldier settlement (Australia)?  Seems unnecessary, and people are likely to search for the two-word phrase and might want to get to this page straight up without having to interpret the search results page.  180.214.168.191 (talk) 08:40, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why the parenthetical location? 

message: I moderate the Culture Victoria website and have added an external link to videos and images from the Red Cliffs soldier settlement area.Eleworth (talk) 05:10, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  New External Link added
Talk:Chinenye Ochuba-Akinlade

message: I just can't see the notability here. Almost all the links are dead, and the subject and article would seem to fail notability (entertainers), people notable only for one event, and what Wikipedia is not. I'm considering nominating for deletion. Centrepull (talk) 10:24, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thinking of AfD 
Talk:University of the Philippines ROTC

message: *University of the Philippines ROTC  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.147.50.169 (talk) 10:49, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Images

message: Long and thorough, but needs a little work. I don't think it's quite clear enough from the introduction paragraph that this is a native Filipino military group and not somehow a branch of the US military - Douglas MacArthur was American, and ROTC is an American term (certainly not a Spanish or Filipino one), so I think it can be confusing, particularly for American readers. Also, there are elements which do not read encyclopedically, and sound as if they were written by a member of the unit, taken from the unit's webpage or something like that. In particular, "Duty well performed, Honor untarnished, and Country above-self has been the shibboleth and clarion call of the UP Vanguard since its inception 78 years ago" sounds like an overly embellished self-proud sort of way of describing the unit's history - not very objective or encyclopedic. A great start, just needs some work. Thanks. @LordAmeth 09:39, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: WPMILHIST Assessment

message: Please include details about the ROTC/CMT units of U.P. Baguio and U.P. Los Baños, and any other U.P. ROTC/CMT unit.  Current articles and histories concentrate only on the U.P. Manila and U.P. Diliman ROTC units.  Also include details about such matters as the Vanguard Magazine, a publication of the U.P. Corps of Cadets which existed in the early 1950s.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.131.147.186 (talk) 03:45, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Other units

message: The 1990 movie Tora Tora, Bang Bang was partly filmed at the Department of Citzen Military Training at U.P. Diliman.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.105.117.98 (talk) 08:36, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Film appearance

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 02:21, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:USS Salt Lake City (CA-25)

message: I got NARA to cough up the coordinates of the wreckage of the USS SLC, but I don't know how to read them! Can anyone help!? I'll provide the information below:
My email and their response:
“The USS Salt Lake City (CL/CA-25) of the United States Navy was a Pensacola-class cruiser that served in the Pacific Theater during World War 2. Following the end of the war, the ship was used as a test vessel for Operation Crossroads, the atomic bomb experiments that took place at Bikini Atoll. Following the tests, she was decommissioned and sunk as a target vessel on 25 May 1948, 130 miles off the coast of Southern California. The vessel was believed to be radioactive at the time of its sinking. The vessel was subsequently stricken from the Naval Vessel Register. There are no listed coordinates for the wreckage of the ship anywhere in the public record, online or otherwise. I am requesting records and information pertaining to the exact coordinates of the wreckage of the USS Salt Lake City (CA-25). I am also requesting relevant information on the legality and safety of seeking out the vessel's wreckage in 2024.”
Image can be viewed here on Reddit:
https://www.reddit.com/r/adventures/comments/1ac25ok/coordinates_of_the_wreckage_of_the_uss_salt_lake/ VindonnusHasNotBeenUsed7777777 (talk) 04:23, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinates of the Wreckage of the USS Salt Lake City! HELP ME READ THEM!
Talk:The Other Way (Weezer song)

message: I think even though this is a non-charting song, it is arguably the best Weezer song since Pinkerton, so at least it should be here as some sort of dubious milestone. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.134.58.57 (talk • contribs).
:*That argument probably won't hold up in a deletion discussion unless there are reputable sources that agree with you; just because you think it's a great song does not make it notable enough to have an article. Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to take part in this argument, and I can't say that I'm either for or against deletion, I just think that if you can back up your argument with a few sources, you'll make a stronger case.  - HammerHeadHuman (talk) 02:34, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion
Talk:Political groups under Vladimir Putin's presidency

message: Should Roman Tsepov and Anatoly Sobchak be in the list? How about Anatoly Chubais, he worked in SPb Majoral office as well (not for very long though) Alex Bakharev 02:13, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Neither Sobchak nor Tsepov or Chubais have enjoyed promotion under Vladimir Putin, unlike those listed. Frankly, whether Kudrin is appropriate here is also not clear. Colchicum 02:25, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The system of database references looks pretty much as in my article Transmembrane protein....Biophys 05:02, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Old talk

message: I've made the following changes:
* Minimize the lead by moving opionated statements, etc. to the article body (to the "Overview" and "Opinions" chapters.) I think the lead should be as general and neutral as possible (larger discussions should not take place there)
* Added a background chapter
* Moved "history" to further below (I think it's not as important as describing the (then) current situation under Putin's presidency.)
* Added a graphic about the groups based on page 34 of the book "Developments in Russian Politics Vol 6."
* Added more information about the various groups using John P. Willerton's article from the book as a source Offliner (talk) 14:14, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Reorganization and expansion

message: #Can we remove the confusing and pov tags now? I think the article has got better after the recent edits.
#Should we use present or past tense consistently? Some of this information is still current under Medvedev's presidency, but I think all our sources describe the situation under Putin, which is now in the past. My opinion is that we maybe should use past tense everywhere. Offliner (talk) 14:18, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Questions

message: In the article's diagram St Petersburg is misspelled twice (as "St Peterburg") and Igor Sechin is incorrectly called "Ivan Sechin".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.171.54.116 (talk) 05:14, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diagram Needs Corrections
Talk:Casco Bay High School

message: I'd like to propose removing the entirety of the Administration section as it seems to fail a NPOV test in addition to WP:BLP/H. This information is not relevant to the subject.
ClaudeDavid (talk) 00:12, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Administration 

message: What exactly is expeditionary learning?  This term should not be used to describe Casco Bay High School without proper explanation.  Jules1236 02:19, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expeditionary learning 
Category talk:Landforms of the United States

message: this seems to be the only country to have a landforms category for it.  Why does this exist?  Why not exist for all the other countries? Hmains 02:30, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: never mind; I created the rest.  Hmains 03:16, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:National caveats

message: (1) I'm not sure that "national caveat" has achieved the status of term/concept. It's not because it has been used several times by politicians and political scientists that it has become more than a combination of two normal words. (2) Even if it can be considered a term, "national caveat" is (until now) solely used in connection with the current war in Afghanistan. The Riga summit and Joseph Nye's comment were also directly pointed towards that war. Therefore I suggest that this page merges with the 2001 War in Afghanistan article. Sijo Ripa 02:34, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal

message: IN response to the previous post, national caveats have been a problem in Kosovo as well as Afghanistan, according to an article from [www.worldsecuritynetwork.com/showArticle3.cfm?article_id=13085&topicID=31] by James Pardew (deputy assistant secretary general and director of operations in NATO's Operations Division)on 20 June 2006, "NATO's evolving operations,". "The upsurge in violence in Kosovo in March 2004 highlighted both the problem caused by restrictions on the use of forces and the importance of quality intelligence. The rioting effectively took the Alliance by surprise and national caveats hampered the immediate response." —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Fp21 (talk • contribs) 14:27, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  National caveats should be separate 

message: Since the caveats have been invoked in other conflicts, not just in Afghanistan, then would it make sense to merge this into the main Nato article? It might go in the section on membership; details of known caveats could then be placed in the Notes column against the relevant nation? --AndrewHowse 15:42, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd recommend putting the known ones in this page, and if there is enough, leave it.  Not sure about the scope of this -- Granite26 19:08, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better to merge into NATO article? 

message: Changed from there to their.
Granite26 19:07, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit
Talk:Stephen Kinzer

message: The article, under Views, gives a lot of space to Noam Chomsky's critique of Kinzer, though that critique appears to be refuted in the next paragraph. I don't see the point of the extensive and rather tendentious Chomsky quote; at most one could say that some critics, like Chomsky, accused Kinzer of harboring an establishment bias even though at other times his articles pointed clearly to the negative effects of US foreign policy in Latin America and elsewhere.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chemyanda (talk • contribs) 22:53, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Balance 
Talk:Bob Scott (rugby)

message: Article seems biased. Also only ref is an article from a magazine. I think it should either be expanded if subject is truly notable, or else deleted.--H-ko (Talk) 02:42, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV/notability 
Talk:Alaskan Hotel and Bar

message: I created this page with the intent to update it in the near future with a bit of historical information on the hotel. 
I should disclose the fact that I am an employee and tenant of the business, but my intentions are not to advertise per se, but rather to share some information on what I consider to be a unique and interesting establishment that holds a significant place in Alaskan history.
As I have been unable to login via IRC to gather feedback on the nature of this (currently) brief article, I am hoping this talk page will generate some input on whether this is a legitimate article which could be considered (as info is added) to be a useful addition to Wikipedia.
As I said, my intention is not to advertise, but to create a reference to this Cordova landmark. The owner has made it clear that he does not intend to promote his business beyond word-of-mouth, since the condition of the building is rustic and the hotel is run very informally. Persons looking for elegant or modern accomodations will be advised to patronize other establishments in the area, and those seeking historic accomodations which are purely representative of Cordova's early days will likely be disappointed. 
We love this place, but we are not attempting to persuade anyone else to appreciate this eclectic and living part of Alaskan pioneer heritage.
Comments are most welcome!
Barnacle9 02:42, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Note from creator
Talk:Royal Academy of Art, The Hague

message: does anyone object to moving this article to its native title ? John Vandenberg 02:45, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I object. It's against our guidelines. gidonb (talk) 09:49, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  move to "Koninklijke Academie van Beeldende Kunsten, Den Haag" 

message: The article claims that it is the oldest art academy in Europe, and that it was founded in 1682. On the other hand, the Royal Academy of Fine Arts (Antwerp) claims to be "one of the oldest in Europe" and was founded in 1663, i.e. 19 years before the The Hague one... And the Accademia di Belle Arti Firenze was founded in 1563. Fram (talk) 12:16, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oldest art academy in Europe?
Talk:Boston College Eagles men's basketball

message: Meclee (talk) 09:45, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Undergraduate Research Opportunities Program

message: I've removed the how-to's from the article per WP:NOT#IINFO.  If you think some of the information could have been integrated, here's the permalink.  ShadowHalo 02:53, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: How-to's

message: This article needs sources, including inline citations. Lentower (talk) 08:50, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  In-line citations needed 

message: The founding and history at MIT, including the role Edwin Land played needs to be added to this article. Lentower (talk) 08:54, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Founding & history at MIT with [[Edwin Land]]
Talk:The results of training

message: Im editing the line in the trivia noting the scene is Narurot Tajuu Kage Bunshin scene. Im gonna say it Mirrors that of the scene in the first episode when Naruto used it against Mizuki. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.237.241.215 (talk) 17:09, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Tajuu Kage Bunshin scene
Talk:Hiram Caton

message: The ANU website does not know him, his page at Online Opinion" states he had a "Research Fellowship at the Australian National University" http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/author.asp?id=4047 - what does that mean? Paul foord 03:01, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled