Talk:Gerald Durrell

message: I'd be much obliged is someone acquainted with Duerrell's works were to answer my question over at Talk:Tambalacoque. -Itai 22:09, 17 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It's weird the articles that get-a-life vandals choose to attack ... I wouldn't have thought Gerald Durrell would be high on the radar of people who like boring anti-gay jokes. I've blocked 195.188.250.67 for 48 hours, but whoever the vandal is, he/she/it is bouncing around and will probably come back. yawn - DavidWBrooks 13:26, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: wow, I just created the Miskolc Zoo article, and I'm surprised to see that this article already refers to it :) sometimes I gotta just love Wikipedia :) Alensha 22:29, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: :)

message: Subsidiary articles to be polished:
*Durrell Wildlife Park
*Durrell Wildlife Conservation Trust
*Edward Whitley
Article content:
*Arabian Oryx mention in the captive breeding section
*Trivia: Gerald Durrell side (?) of Corfu
*Mention of Spiro in Corfu ?
*ISBN for the books - be warned, laborious task
Why the book "Halibut Filet" (in Russian "File iz paltusa" or "File iz kambaly") isn't mentioned in the list of Mr.Durrell books? I couldn't find them anywhere in the web, although I do have Russian translation of it! Needs to add.
Maybe it is part of some other book by Durrell???  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.147.104.33 (talk) 14:45, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: To do

message: This article is getting awfully, awfully long. It's time to think about breaking off pieces - the zoo and the trust, for example - so we can remove some of that material from this article, allowing it to concentrate on Gerald Durrell - DavidWBrooks 22:34, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the major length of the article is due to the extensive bibliography and radiography. We could initially break those off and see. I will be updating the trust and the zoo articles, but the material on the biography about the zoo and the trust, i think, would need to be in the durrell article somehow - the vision for the trust was virtually exclusively durrell's, after all. Pradiptaray 23:14, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The way to do that is to have just a sentence or two saying that he founded the zoo, and then a link saying "Main article: Jersey Zoo right there, so people can follow it if they want more. If they just want a quick sense of his life, or if they are looking for other material, such as his novels, they won't have to scroll through lots of material. - DavidWBrooks 14:20, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

text: Yes, I think so too. And anyway most of the article has references, lists and tables, so the size isnt as awfully big as it seems. I did put in a few pics so that the lists dont seem bare, so it takes slightly long to load :) Pradiptaray 03:11, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

text: I think I know the answer to that, I think I read it in Botting's biography, but I was reminded of it recently by a friend of mine, another Durrell fan. It was a ploy by Gerry to show his family as a single entity, which would never have been possible had nancy been there, in which case he would have had to have larry and nancy living separately. btw, if u r a durrell fan, u r more than welcome to contribute ! there is a lot of work left. get yourself a wikipedia id, and sign ur name in discussions like this by 4 ~ s ( like ~ ~ ~ ~ ), so that it is easier to communicate :) Pradiptaray 03:11, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Length

message: Does anyone have details about the annual Gerald Durrell lecture ? I can only see the 2002 talk on the web. Pradiptaray 06:57, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Salters institute

message: I lost the discussion above, but a year later - and even though I'm a lifelong Gerry Durrell fan (I met him once) - I still think this article is way too long and should be broken into sub-articles, with some of the photos and most of the book covers removed. (Have pity on readers with dial-up connections!) As a point of reference, this article is 47 kb, while William Shakespeare is 45 kb! - DavidWBrooks 22:03, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably because we do not have quite as many images of the bard, for some reason. We should probably prune a few from this article. Question is, which ones? Jonathunder 22:17, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I just removed one - we had several of him with primates; now we have fewer. Another idea - remove all the book covers except one. They belong with the article about the book.  - DavidWBrooks 22:44, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, Ill try and do so, meanwhile David has made a start :) ray 06:33, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is clumsily large 

message: I am currently reading "My family and Other Animals" by Mr. Durrell, and very much enjoying it, when I stumbled on a line that made me read it again and it again. It says as follows: 
"In the holes were the pouting blennies, which stared at you with their thick lips, giving their faces an expression of negroid insolence as they fluttered their fins at you." (pg. 214)
This book came out in 1956, so I'm assuming racism was pretty rampant at this point in time in the UK...But I just found it a little shocking and disapoiting nonetheless. Has anyone else seen similar language in his other books?
Staywarm 23:58, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Durrel's interaction with Africans in his animal-collection books from that continent is generally respectful, but not always couched in the terminology we would use today. As a white American it strikes me as fine, but if I was a black African, a few bits might be harder to overlook. - DavidWBrooks 13:11, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Racist language 

message: :Image:Talkingparcel.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 07:13, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Talkingparcel.JPG

message: Readers of this article might be interested in commenting on the article about Leslie Durrell. Check the talk page - you'll see that I think  Leslie barely deserves an article at all, since he chose to be non-notable (so to speak), and that he certainly doesn't deserve the long, gossip-filled commentary on his personality which has been placed there as an article. 
But at least two folks disagree. That article has very few editors, however, so more opinions would be helpful. - DavidWBrooks (talk) 12:00, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've listed the article for deletion here. Let the debate begin. --Michael Johnson (talk) 03:15, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article about Leslie 

message: 'Radiography' does not relate to radio programmes in the way that 'filmography' relates to cinema films.  If it's not changed soon, I'll replave it with 'List of radio programmes' or similar. 86.166.161.22 (talk) 18:42, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Radiography 

message: The photograph of Gerald Durrell in a red shirt with a snake in his lap that appears on your main page was taken by my late husband the photographer Tony Evans.  It is a copyrighted image, managed by Getty Images. I am perfectly happy for Wikipedia to use it but with a credit to Tony Evans/Timelapse Library/Getty Images.Timelaspe Library Limited (talk) 10:13, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I've notified the editor who placed the photo. - DavidWBrooks (talk) 16:49, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photograph 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Gerald Durrell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110720153212/http://www.aemnp.eu/PDF/45/Kment2.pdf to http://www.aemnp.eu/PDF/45/Kment2.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:09, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I have removed this gallery of eight uninteresting and unlabeled photos of the Jersey Zoo / park - they add nothing to an article about Durrell the person. Here they are, in case others disagree (I shrank them):
File:La Mênag'gie d'Jèrri siez Durrell 2013 149.jpg
File:La Mênag'gie d'Jèrri siez Durrell 2013 122.jpg
File:La Mênag'gie d'Jèrri siez Durrell 2013 109.jpg
File:La Mênag'gie d'Jèrri siez Durrell 2013 174.jpg
File:La Mênag'gie d'Jèrri siez Durrell 2013 61.jpg
File:La Mênag'gie d'Jèrri siez Durrell 2013 58.jpg
File:La Mênag'gie d'Jèrri siez Durrell 2013 192.jpg
File:La Mênag'gie d'Jèrri siez Durrell 2013 171.jpg
- DavidWBrooks (talk) 17:03, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos of the park 

message: Why is his marriage to Jacqui mentioned twice ? It’s as though someone has not read the article right through before adding that material. And seriously, does Jacqui really deserve a separate entry? After her two books, her connection with Durrell is nil. 203.59.215.236 (talk) 10:33, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redundancy 

message: This article is missing a lot of in-line citations. Maybe everything is covered by the reference list sources, but it would be very helpful to know where details have come from. RapturousRatling (talk) 22:53, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing in-line citations 

message: Since the ITV series 'The Durrells' one can expect a slew of misinformation relating to it. Most common is from people entering the grounds of the villa used for filming, taking photographs, then claiming they are of the real villa the Durrell family lived in in the Kontokali area of Corfu. They invariably are not. Furthermore the grounds themselves are private, although the approach from the beach below is public land. The real villa is on a hill overlooking the Kontokali region and is again privately owned, but also well-hidden by trees. Also the 'White House' restaurant in Kalami, one-time residence of Lawrence and Nancy Durrell, is often (misleadingly) referred to as having been home to the Durrell family. The 'Snow-White Villa' of Gerald's writing is somewhere else entirely; again, a private property. 185.201.0.197 (talk) 18:58, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect Photographs 

message: Suggestion to merge Corfu trilogy into this page.  The article itself is extremely short, and if anything, provides links to the three books individually.  I suggest a merge/re-direct of the article to this page.  Thanks conman33 (. . .talk) 06:18, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree - works and their author are two district topics. The trilogy article is very short, almost functioning as a disambiguation post, but I think it still serves a purpose for somebody interested in the trilogy rather than the author. - DavidWBrooks (talk) 19:44, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I support a merge/re-direct of the article. — Sadko (words are wind) 20:45, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Support merge: The diambiguation role could be served by section in Gerald Durrell#Books; the books have a page, the author has a page, so having a third page is unnecessary duplication. Klbrain (talk) 11:10, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

text: Support merge. I would not generally suggest the merging of articles on works into articles on authors if there is much material on the works, but this is not the case here, as we have well-developed articles on the individual books. This one only serves as a superfluous extra level that we (and the reader) could do without. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 09:20, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Corfu trilogy article into his biography page