lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Futari wa Pretty Cure Splash Star

message: What do Saki and Mai do to the Spiral Rings before doing their attack? I watched it on YouTube  and still don't get what they are doing before launching their attack. I know just before the attack they spin them, but what do Saki and Mai first do to the Spiral Rings? Tikal-chan 00:46, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Spiral Rings have three parts to them: the main part that they wear (with the "dial" bit), and two little blue rings that are normally just stored off to the side (not sure where Mai's are, but on Saki's there's one on each side of the dial).  The first thing they do is... well, the first thing they do is apparently meaningless arm motions, but after that they take the two rings and put them over the dial.  --Andrusi 21:01, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  What do they do to... 

message: Most of the summaries are only 1-sentence long. It would be better to provide more in-depth facts about each episode. Starcity ai 01:09, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Summary length 

message: References should be just that: references. Not long explanations. If something needs an explanation, such explanation should be in the article, not as a reference. It goes against every kind of article guideline. If nobody says anything, I'm just going to move those explanations in the article itself in a few days Sirtao (talk) 06:15, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:John I of Sweden

message: "Skáldatal gives Einarr Skúlason and Halldórr skvaldri as two of John's court skalds."
Skáldatal also gives Halldórr as one of Magnus Barefoot's skalds. Since Magnus died in 1103 and Jón was born in 1201, Halldórr must have lived to a very old age... Sigo 17:11, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Jon Jarl was probably not John I of Sweden (born 1201), but this does not really solve the chronology of Skaldatal. /Pieter Kuiper 18:25, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Jon Jarl was probably Sörkvir Kolsson's eldest son. I don't see any other problem with the chronology of Skáldatal. Sigo 21:31, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Halldórr skvaldri
Talk:Sverker II of Sweden

message: The redirect Sweartgar II has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  signed, Rosguill talk 18:52, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Sweartgar II]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect Sweartgar II of Sweden has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  signed, Rosguill talk 18:53, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Sweartgar II of Sweden]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Sverker I of Sweden

message: According to my reference (Lindström, 2006) Sverker had the following children:
* Jon Jarl, dead c. 1153, "killed by peasants at the thing".
* Karl Sverkersson, king 1161-1167, married to Kristina Stigsdotter of Danish House of Hvide (Hvideätten).
* Three other children:
** Daughter, unknown name, married to Knut Magnusson of Denmark.
** Kol, dead c. 1172-73. (Possible son of Jon Jarl)
** Burislev, dead 1172-73. (Possible son of Jon Jarl)
This list is much different from the information in the article which is therefore either wrong or needs references.  As my book is not citing any references itself, I feel reluctant to add the list above to the article.
 / Mats Halldin (talk) 12:29, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Children of Sverker 

message: The redirect Sweartgar I has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  signed, Rosguill talk 18:52, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Sweartgar I]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect Sweartgar I of Sweden has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  signed, Rosguill talk 18:53, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Sweartgar I of Sweden]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect Sweartgar the Elder has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  signed, Rosguill talk 18:53, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Sweartgar the Elder]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Omnichord

message: Since the image originally in this article appears to have been deleted, is there anything wrong with using this one from the Suzuki music site in the UK? -- Tuvok^Talk|Desk|Contribs  08:42, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: Hi all. I've added a table with all the different Omnichord models laid out. I wasn't able to find a reliable source as to the release year of the OM150 and OM250M. I used 1994 which I found in an online sales listing for one of them, but hopefully someone here can confirm the year these were released?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by InDimensional (talk • contribs) 20:49, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: OM150 and OM250M Release Year

message: I've also added a new 'notable users' section. I can see in the history that there used to be a notable users section that was removed for 'not a directory' and being poorly sourced, so I've aimed to reintroduce it using sourced examples of examples of exactly when / on which recordings it has been used. It seems a shame not have any mention of David Bowie playing one in the Concert for New York City. InDimensional (talk) 21:03, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable Users

message: Someone needs to drop some theory knowledge on this to share why it starts with flats rather than traditional C through to B. WE NEED MORE INTEL. 51.230.74.126 (talk) 09:54, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  More information needed
Talk:After the Fire

message: :Image:After The Fire in 1980.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 02:51, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:After The Fire in 1980.jpg

message: I have a vague recollection that this band has a connection with Whitgift School (South Croydon, UK). Can anyone confirm this, or deny it? debater (talk) 23:01, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whitgift School Origins
Category talk:Political advocacy groups in the United States

message: Somewhat unwieldy category. Propose a few additional categories that would pull in at least 30 orgs to start:
* Peace and anti-war organizations in the United States
* Free expression organizations in the United States
* Technology policy organizations in the United States
* Voting and election policy organizations in the United States
* something to pull together the pro-life /anti-abortion /anti-birth-control groups in accordance w/ wp terminology on this issue
I'd like feedback before I start reorganizing, having scanned through some of the arguments on the CFD (categories for deletion) pages & seen how contentious descriptions of political advocacy, in particular, can get.  However, I strongly feel that these cat pages that overflow onto multiple pages lose most of their value for browsers, who (A) can't skim through that many individual organizations anyway; and (B) probably don't even realize there are more orgs and more available subcategories on the subsequent pages. --LQ 23:41, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: propose new sub-categories
Talk:Inge the Elder

message: I am restoring info recently removed because it was properly and dependably sourced. SergeWoodzing (talk) 00:24, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: "Speculation" is the right word. Woodzing's wording suggests that there are medieval sources making the connection. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 00:54, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

text: Professor Thunberg writes that it is likely that these two are one and the same man, based on his academic findings. Is that speculation? Is that OR? I provided a valid reliable source here! SergeWoodzing (talk) 12:25, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It is, from Wikipedias point of view, speculation if, and only if, reliable sources say that it is speculation. As I understand it, there are no such sources, and hence it should not be called speculation. --OpenFuture (talk) 13:39, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info sourced to academic historian removed as "speculation"
Talk:Emerging church/Archive 3

message: Sorry everyone.  I looked over the talk on this article but felt that it should be said:  this article needs more information about criticsm against the emergent church.  i know this will be a difficult task as some of us are probably emergent memembers and some are not, but as we are all christians, i think we can work on this together in a positive way so that the article reflects the issues that other branches of christianity have with the emergent church and postmodernism in general (you emergents should check out information on the idea that postmodernism (in terms of secular society) has been "ending" for the past five years or so, as well as if emergent church can be or actually is postmodern. thanks for that side note). the section of criticism links is a good start.  lets see if we can get such a complete comprehesive section done for this article, as it is needed to understand the emergent church movement and those who are 20-something christians who know modern and postmodern thought and choose to work in another vein.  thanks all! Dantedanti 02:48, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism needs to be fleshed out 

message: I have restructured the article in the hopes that it would be a step towards removal of the cleanup tag in this article.  Let me know if they were effective or not.
The many references to the structure, ecclesiology and denominations found in the article have been collected into the Membership, Ecclesiology and Structure section.  The many criticisms and links to critical articles and critics has been collected into the Criticisms section.  The Common Values and Characteristics section requires significant editing with many duplicated concepts.  There are still many requests for citations (some that I've added) that require good sources.  The Criticisms section also requires significant editing and trimming of the number of articles referenced, many of which reiterate the same points.  Highlighting a few well-written and prominent artilces would probably be more effective than the current list. Gold Dragon 16:18, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Restructured towards removing cleanup tag
Talk:Beheiren

message: Is this expression below correct?
:After the Soviet Union dissolved, it was proved that Oda and Yoshikawa were the KGB agents by opening the confidential Soviet documents to the public.
I'm curious if there is "really" the phrase "Oda and Yoshikawa were the KGB agents" in the reference, Koenker, Diane P., and Ronald D. Bachman (ed.), Revelations from the Russian archives : Documents in English Translation, Washington, D.C. : Library of Congress, 1997.
If not, I hope to know what the reference really says.
Are they really "the KGB agents"? --Miya 23:56, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correctness
Talk:Emerging church/Archive 6

message: Whoever edited the introduction to the emerging church has done a great job. Much more succinct and to the point. Good broad overview for an introduction. Thank you.
Daniel 
:Daniel, I see that you are new to Wikipedia (at least as an editor).  You can thank Gold Dragon for the edits you liked.  One suggestion, and I don't know how to say this politely, but I reccomend you have someone check your grammar, usage, and spelling before inserting your edits.  There were several problems of this kind in the edits you made.  Also, discussion takes place mostly at the bottom of the page and you can sign your comments here by clicking on the four tildes at the bottom right after it says in bold letters "Sign Your Name" It's quicker.  Also note the message that says "If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly or redistributed by others, do not submit it."  It really helps to have thick skin when working as a Wikipedia editor.Will3935 16:38, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good job with editing 

message: What happened? Someone went through and removed a bunch of pro-emergent links and added anti-emergent stuff. There are almost no pro-emergent blogs or sites linked to. Why would someone do this?
:You apparently have not been reading the dialogue going on toward the bottom of the page.  We have had many issues to deal with over time and now it seems we will end up deleting all or nearly all blogs pro and critical of EC per Wikipedia policy.  No one person or perspective has caused the content of the article to be what it is.  In fact, the one insisting we delete all links to blogs is one of the most pro-EC editors working on the article.  Your input (at the bottom of the page) is certainly welcome.Will3935 14:10, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Someone doesn't like emergent, and they changed this page because of it. 

message: I recently visited this defination and found some very major changes - major sections removed and names removed for lists and people added who have nothing to do with the energing church - it has become an "Emergent" defination and it is only voices that seem to be supportive of Emergent.  I find this so very wrong, and so very not what the emerging church is about.  bad form all - very bad form.
:John -- First, it would be nice if you signed in.  Also, the rest of us are talking at the bottom of the page.  You do not specify what your complaints are but several people from different perspectives (emergent, emerging, anti-EC, and neutral) have come to a point of agreement on this article.  I am sure you don't think that you should be the ONE to determine what is right and override the consensus of this diversity of contributors.  Would it be sufficient if we just put your name back on the prominent figures list?--Loudguy 03:56, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who determines what is right?
Talk:The Sims 2: Life Stories

message: The Sims 2: Life Stories should be merged with The Sims 2: Life Stories as they are both talking about the same game or The Sims 2: Life Stories should be deleted as it has the wrong title (judging by the current available information) The Sims: Life Stories is the correct title. Ritc71 10:55, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It appears that this merger has already been taken care of, removing the merge tag. -Warhorus 03:12, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger
Talk:Anekdoten

message: ----
This article is really bad. It looks like what you would find on the band's website or something  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.202.205.112 (talk) 17:46, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

message: The three voluminous sections containing essay-like material were directly copied from the band's website, here: http://www.anekdoten.se/web2001/interviews/integib.html
I've removed them. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 13:35, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyrighted material removed
Talk:Ange (band)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved.  – robertsky (talk) 06:39, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 28 January 2024
Talk:North-West T-way

message: Someone put on this page a list of stations on a possible extension to Windsor - I hardly think this is right, because, as has been pointed out to me, there is already a railway running from near Rouse Hill (the Richmond Line), which will be extended to Rouse Hill from Vineyard by 2020. Additionally, the Government's plans never intended for the T-Way to extend to Windsor, only to Rouse Hill. Thirdly, there is no provision in the Old Windsor Road upgrade to accommodate the T-Way past Rouse Hill.
I'm removing this unless someone can come up with a reference. I suspect it's a hoax.
--
Unofficial T-Way line extensions to Windsor:
*Annangrove (Box Hill, Rouse Hill, Schofields)
*Nelson (Box Hill)
*Terry (Riverstone, Box Hill)
*Boundary (Riverstone, Vineyard, Oakville)
*Chapman (Vineyard)
*Groves (Mulgrave, Vineyard)
*McGraths (McGraths Hill, Mulgrave)
*Macquarie (Windsor, South Windsor)
*Windsor (Interchange)(Connections to Rail Station)
*Moses (Windsor)
*George (Terminating Station)(Connections to Town Centre)(Windsor)
--
I also removed the Powers Business Park station. The proposed Business Park isn't even located on Windsor Road; it's on Powers Road, and would require the transitway buses to divert from their route and come back, and there's already a station at the intersection of Old Windsor Road and Powers Road. JRG 09:07, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Windsor Extension?? 

message: All Routes section was tagged by Gareth Aus on 2007-03-18 with "Some routes may have changes slightly, please change to more accurate information." Is someone able to confirm which routes have changed and help update. Thanks. Breno 09:02, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: A lot of these route descriptions are back to front.  For example
"Parramatta - Blacktown via Sunnyholt Rd T-way, Kings Langley and Westmead"
should read either
"Blacktown - Parramatta via Sunnyholt Rd T-way, Kings Langley and Westmead"
or alternatively
Parramatta - Blacktown via Westmead,  Kings Langley  and Sunnyholt Rd T-way"
Eregli bob (talk) 11:19, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misleading route descriptions
Talk:Calbindin

message: This page definitely reads like it was written for something other than wikipedia, and the content was duplicated in the article, suggesting it was cut and pasted from somewhere.  Is this article a copyright violation?  Where is it from?  Wikipedia can't use most written material without express permission unless it's in the public domain or something.  Also, I think it would be good to have the concepts in the article explained in more plain english, so an average person reading it could have a hope of understanding it. In addition, the article doesn't cite any sources. Lastly, in trying to clarify some stuff, there's a chance that I made subtle factual errors, so I hope someone with more knowledge will fact-check the article.  Thanks very much, delldot | talk 00:10, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Alfredo de la Fé

message: Please note that Alfredo's last name is "De La Fé", not "de la Fé". The sort should be by "D" not "F".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.65.162.125 (talk) 05:15, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name Spelling 

message: Added two external links for to meet notability requirements.  One link is to Smithsonian museum Latin Jazz timeline, the other is to a review written of one of his albums on the Jazz Music Archives.
Other links which may be of use:
http://books.google.com/books?id=AyQEAAAAMBAJ&pg=PT43&lpg=PT43&dq=Alfredo+De+La+Fe+billboard&source=bl&ots=oOmOG-OlTi&sig=hcZz4LGPDMf81AL1AOPxG-1GqSU&hl=en&ei=SD45TqrkMYu2tge1iNzzAg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=7&ved=0CEMQ6AEwBg#v=onepage&q=Alfred
http://www.nytimes.com/1982/01/16/arts/jazz-latin-tito-puente.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.73.163.49 (talk) 18:55, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Let's talk
Talk:Tingmissartoq

message: This article has been reverted by a bot to  as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) This has been done to remove User:Accotink2's contributions as they have a history of extensive copyright violation and so it is assumed that all of their major contributions are copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. VWBot (talk) 05:41, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 

message: This article has been reverted by a bot to  as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) This has been done to remove User:Accotink2's contributions as they have a history of extensive copyright violation and so it is assumed that all of their major contributions are copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. VWBot (talk) 12:54, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 
Talk:Lisa Ruddy

message: View source shows the document being truncated in a javascript block:	
<script type= "text/javascript">/*<![CDATA[*/
var skin = "monobook";
var stylepath = "/skins-1.5";
var wgArticlePath = "/wiki/$1";
var wgScriptPath = "/w";
var wgScript = "/w/index.php";
var wgServer = "http://en.wikipedia.org";
var wgCanonicalNamespace = "";
var wgCanonicalSpecialPageName = false;
var wgNamespaceNumber = 0;
var wgPageName = "Lisa_Ruddy";
var wgTitle = "Lisa Ruddy";
var wgAction = "view";
var wgRestrictionEdit = [];
var wgRestrictionMove = [];
var wgArticleId = "5566200";
var wgIsArticle = true;
var wgUserName = null;
var wgUserGroups = null;
var wgUserLanguage = "en";
var wgContentLanguage = "en";
var wgBre
75.138.184.254 23:26, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The page is broken in Firefox 2.0.0.6