lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Gloria Jahoda

message: I created this entry for the author of Florida history, Gloria Jahoda.--Mike 08:12, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lunar 2: Eternal Blue

message: This article should be renamed, as there is no ordinal in the MegaCD/SegaCD title - it's only in the remake. Shiva Indis 06:50, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone already made a (shabby) Lunar: Eternal Blue article. I suggest merging it to this one. Brutannica 01:12, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:San Nicolás de los Arroyos

message: I will erase the Redirect page San Nicolás, Buenos Aires, because it will be used for the Neighbourhood in Buenos Aires city rather than the city in the Buenos Aires Province.
The Neighbourhood's Article should have, though, a reference such as:
:For the city in the Buenos Aires Province see San Nicolás de los Arroyos
I'll try to create the article ASAP. Mariano(t/c) 08:33, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Messenger (novel)

message: Where has it been said that the book takes place in 2073?  If one goes by what the Giver said, the book takes place centuries from now, as he mentions overpopulation starving people out.
Ayjazz (talk) 10:25, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Year?

message: needs work, it has a list of unimportant facts from the book.  Also, It says for sure the Ruler or w/e they called him was Jonas.  It was implied but never said, it was open ended.--206.176.110.227 (talk) 21:03, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Symbolism section

message: I am really not sure, but I think the thing about jonas isnt true.
 But it is a really nice story  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.99.233.95 (talk) 17:45, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: In my class we have read The Giver and Gathering Blue and Lowry has done a fantastic job at concluding both novels and tieing up the loose ends that bothered readers of The Giver such as not knowing what happned to Jonas. And to those who havent read this book yet i strongly suggest you do! The only part that bothered me was that Matty dies, I cried :( .
66.82.9.84 19:49, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Great Series! 

message: Does anyone agree with the Notability notice on this page? I noticed that the user who put it on here was only ever active for one day and just went around putting Notability notices on a bunch of books, and that's all.  Not sure whether to consider this vandalism or legitimate.
98.243.65.191 (talk) 19:00, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: Sorry for all the edits. It was like you see something, you fix it, and you see another thing on the same page. 66.206.115.182 (talk) 15:43, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Many edits by [[66.206.115.182]]
Template talk:Campaignbox Valley of Mexico Campaign

message: Would the Battle of Buena Vista be included in this campaign? Ben D. 09:02, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: No, not really. Buena Vista should be grouped with the various battles and skirmishes in the northern borderlands (if there's a campaign for those). What's classified under the Valley of Mexico campaign are those battles after the landings at Veracruz (Veracruz Expedition), in the immediate vicinity of the capital. Which all took place 6 months after Buena Vista. –Hajor 12:17, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, thanks for your response, I might get around to making a campaignbox for it if there isn't one already Ben D. 13:41, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Stretford

message: I see that this, very interesting, article is giving the results of the 2010 general election. Given that we've had two since then (2015/2017), it should probably be updated. KJP1 (talk) 18:24, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately the WMF position of WP article maintainer appears to be vacant, as I can find nobody listed on their web site to complain to. ;-) So, in lieu of any official action, I've taken the liberty of updating this section myself.  Eric Corbett 23:26, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Isn't it always the way - if you want a job doing.... But much appreciated. KJP1 (talk) 00:01, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Political representation

message: This older FA has been allowed to slip out of date.  The political representation section discusses the 2014 elections and none after, despite there having been more recent ones.  The material about Longford Park should be expanded beyond just a single sentence directing us to that article.  Some of the statistics in the discussion of local education are now rather dated.  The 2001 census table in the religion section needs to be updated to reflect 2011.  Additionally, chunks of uncited text have creeped in.  If improvements are not made, a featured article review may be necessary. Hog Farm  Talk 04:41, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Yup, I flagged the cns and there are 21 total. (t · c) buidhe 04:04, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:URFA/2020]]
Talk:Tshe

message: I reverted the move to Tje, because Unicode officially calls it Tshe , and there is a Komi letter Tje (U+50E, U+50F) in the Cyrillic Supplement range . -- Curps 10:13, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: So, who wants to add a topic to the article about how this is poised to be a replacement for the word "the" in texting and email?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moeburn (talk • contribs) 01:29, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replacement for the word "The" 

message: The usage of  is under discussion, see talk:Ћ and WP:Articles for deletion/Ћ -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 10:24, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: "{{noredirect|Ћ}}"

message: The sentence "used only in the serbian alphabet" is in contradiction with the presence of that character in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montenegrin_alphabet
Even if it's considered that Montenegro uses the Serbian alphabet, that consideration should be written so the reader is fully informed. I hope it helps.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.228.144.16 (talk) 18:37, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  incoherent assertion 

message: This character was used in the older Chuvash alphabet made by Ivan Yakolevich Yakolev. There is a wiki article about him here.
A comparison of the older Chuvash alphabet with the newer one was give by John Krueger, who wrote the Chuvash Manual. That comparison can be found here , under the heading 1.11 The Chuvash Alphabet. 104.246.47.236 (talk) 21:13, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use in older Chuvash alphabet 

message: I'm now use Ћ. Ћ fasts types and writes. Ћ is 27th letter. OMG. Ћ is Ћ Serbian Cyrillic letter. :D. --46.130.5.85 (talk) 09:33, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Ћ is Ћ 27th letter of the English alphabet. Ћ letter is Ћ new 27th letter, Word «The» is consumed in 80 of all paragraphs.  is used as Ћ 27th letter of the alphabet.
=== Sample: (ref: The===
 is  only definite article in English, denoting person(s) or thing(s) already mentioned, under discussion, implied, or otherwise presumed familiar to  listener or reader.  is  most commonly used word in  English language, accounting for 7% of all words.
"" can be used with both singular and plural nouns, with nouns of any gender, and with nouns that start with any letter. This is different from many other languages which have different articles for different genders or numbers.  is pronounced two ways.
--46.130.43.205 (talk) 17:36, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  I use «Ћ» for the word «The». 

message: is  only definite article in English, denoting person(s) or thing(s) already mentioned, under discussion, implied, or otherwise presumed familiar to  listener or reader.  is  most commonly used word in  English language, accounting for 7% of all words.
"" can be used with both singular and plural nouns, with nouns of any gender, and with nouns that start with any letter. This is different from many other languages which have different articles for different genders or numbers.  is pronounced two ways.
--46.130.43.205 (talk) 17:36, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sample: (ref: [[The]]
Talk:55 Group

message: The entire text of this artcle is lifted from the main SNP article. It should therefore be a redirect to the relevant section. The following text has been removed and a redirect established:
TEXT BEGINS
The 55 Group were a caucus within the Scottish National Party (SNP) formed in 1955.  This caucus campaigned to win control of the SNP at its 1956 annual convention in Stirling but failed to win enough votes.. This group was formed mainly of younger SNP members frustrated at the lack of electoral progress of the party in this period. It was led by a Major James Glendinning and had loose connections with cells of the self styled SRA (Scottish Republican Army). There was also overt tones of anti-English sentiment amongst this grouping, epitomised by the publication of a leaflet The English: Are They Human?. This anti-English streak proved too much to bear for the SNP leadership and the 55 Group were expelled, with most of their members going onto form a new political party, the Nationalist Party of Scotland (NPS) (not to be confused with the earlier NPS). The new party contested several Glasgow and Edinburgh municipal seats in 1957. This split in the SNP proved to be minor and involved members, mainly located in the city of Edinburgh Glasgow and Greenock., and the new NPS made no impact what so ever in the long-run. a number of its members rejoined the SNP.
TEXT ENDS
--Mais oui! 11:06, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: 2005 comments
Talk:Trish Thuy Trang

message: WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 20:38, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: I highly doubt she's older than 30 to be born in South Vietnam. DHN 17:46, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I read somewhere that she was born in 1978, but I have to verify that information. Monni 04:56, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Her friends aren't much help atleast... Tried asking politely, but they were pretty cold.. Gonna try another route... Monni 16:53, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year born 

message: I think the other article is just older revision of this article.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Monni1995 (talk • contribs) .
:The other article is to be moved to this article for merging edit history. -- ADNghiem501 09:34, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Wouldn't it be fun if people would post something descriptive in the talk page before starting doing something confusing.Well of coarse it would be. Some templates are pretty vague. Monni 09:56, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speedy deletion 

message: She was categorized as "from" Houston, TX and Los Angeles, CA, yet there is nothing in the article about this. I checked her "official" website and Facebook page, and was unable to find anything that pointed to her current location or places she's lived since leaving Vietnam. Anyone have any reliable sources on this? — Safety Cap (talk) 18:02, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where is she "from"?
Talk:International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence

message: The original article stated:
* IJCAI only accepted 10% of the papers submitted to it in 2005
Where does this information come from? I cannot find this data in the IJCAI site. Besides, it is a little hard to believe. The two personal web sites below reported an acceptance rate of 18% and 22%, respectively, which is in line with the usual IJCAI statistics.
http://www.cs.uwm.edu/~vu/cv.htm
http://teamcore.usc.edu/nair/publications.html
Paolo Liberatore (Talk) 11:41, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

message: The majority of the content in this stub is about the IJCAI conference series, which already has its own page. Blueclaw (talk) 16:36, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Go for it. Makes complete sense. --Akhenaten0 (talk) 22:29, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

text: 'Agree'. They should be merged. Goharshady (talk) 10:13, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence]]
Talk:Evolutionary computation

message: Why are there 2 pages for this? There is Evolutionary Computation and Evolutionary computation They should be merged. JockoJonson 20:44, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: What happened to this article? As the original contributor says, EC is not synonymous with evolutionary algorithms. It's broader. The article should probably revert to 17:51, 28 February 2007, unless anyone has a better plan. --Michael Allan 17:06, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  EC is not synonymous with EA 

message: Dear Oli, 
I followed wikipedia's copyright policy, but could not see which part of my revision refringed copyright. It must be very easy for you to spot - i wonder if you'd be kind enough to spare a minute to point out which part to me, please?  Appreciated. 
The author of the page http://userweb.elec.gla.ac.uk/y/yunli/ga_demo/ga_demo.htm has donated its copyright:
"Copyleft: The text of this webpage is available for modification and reuse under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License and the GNU Free Documentation License." ieee (talk) 20:10, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Reversion because of alleged copyright refringement

message: Please view the new evolutionary computation navigation box template: Template: Evolutionary computation.  Feel free to help organize and add topics, and place the template  at the end of listed articles.  Thanks. TheProfessor (talk) 21:38, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evolutionary computation navigation box template
Talk:Old Kent Road

message: Can I remind all parties that if there is a disagreement with content, or you think something is factually inaccurate that wasn't picked up at the GA review, please list concerns here, and we can all deal with them. I'm sure we all want the article to look as good as possible and it won't hurt to have more eyes to look at it, but at least four experienced reviewers have combed over it carefully, so it's worth taking those comments on board. For example, consider "The Dun Cow ...  was well known for being a gin palace" , the original source says "It was known as a famous Victorian 'Gin Palace', boasting eleven drinking rooms". I think "famous" is a bit too strong (if it was that famous, Dun Cow, London wouldn't be a redlink), but "well-known" is a suitable toned down version that shows this wasn't just any old random pub, but one local historical sources chose to document. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:04, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The article went through a good article review with several experienced editors, including myself, ,  and . It's possible, indeed pretty likely, that mistakes were left, but I would be amazed if there were any serious problems left. Perhaps if you are concerned, it would be worthwhile contacting the Good Article review discussion page with your thoughts. Trafalgar Square had a major effort over the Christmas period, with many editors chipping in from IPs to admins, and it looks a lot better. I don't care who wrote what where and when, leave it focused on content. Whether or not to call it "The" Old Kent road is contentious, as official Transport for London sources do not refer to it this way. What does anyone else think? Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:39, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

text: Get an account and take it to WP:FAC. Learn how to sign your posts and use edit summaries. Why are you using block 3 of Hutchison 3G UK Ltd? Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 18:32, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  A call for calm 

message: Which is clearer? Saying that this Monopoly property is "the" cheapest or "one of the two" cheapest? OK, so maybe it's the second cheapest? In which case why not say that? Ambiguity is bad mmmkay? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.127.111.92 (talk) 13:45, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd say your edit summary did you no favours and thus the edit was treated with disdain.  I would tend to suggest that "one of the two" ought to be clarified in so far as it's one of the two in the cheapest set of roads in Monopoly.  But do try to start discussions constructively.  The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 13:57, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Both Old Kent Road and Whitechapel Road on the stock London Monopoly board cost £60. See List of London Monopoly locations and related references for verification. So it is not the cheapest, it is simply one of the two cheapest. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 19:13, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  cheapest Monopoly property
Talk:Victoria (plant)

message: I've been so bold to replace the photo in the taxobox with one of my own. Seemed a better choice. But does anyone know which Victoria this is? Please tell me on my my talk page so I won't miss the answer. DirkvdM 12:17, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: New taxobox photo

message: Victoria boliviana
- World’s biggest water lily species discovered at Kew Gardens
- A new species of giant water lily has been discovered by scientists - and it’s been hiding in plain sight for 177 years.
- The huge plant had been in the archives of the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew - and was growing in a number of aquatic collections - but it was mistakenly identified as another species.
- It also holds the record as the largest water lily, with leaves growing more than 3m (10ft) wide.
-- https://www.bbc.com/news/av/science-environment-62014587
- 189.122.243.241 (talk) 00:49, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  New species - Victoria boliviana
Talk:The Killers (1946 film)

message: Just broke up article into sections and added cast, re-worked awards.  Article in serious need of footnotes.  Who's in favor of deleting non-references copy edits?  Luigibob 02:28, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copy edits

message: *  ... plot synopsis, review, cast, production credits, awards
Reference available for citing in the article body. Erik (talk) 20:04, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Allmovie

message: IMDb, the Criterion Collection and Hemingway's story say Andreson, Tim Dirks spells it Andersen, while TCM, Allrovi, noir of the week and filmsnoir.net have Anderson. It's pronounced in the film like Andersen or Anderson. I can't find the end credits (if any) on Youtube and I've taped over my copy of the film. The current reference only applies to the story, not the film. All I know is Kitty had nothing to do with this problem. Kitty is innocent! I swear Kitty is innocent! Clarityfiend (talk) 05:27, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: For what it's worth, the Swedish version of the surname Anderson is Andersson.  Andersson is the Swedish family name descended from the meaning "son of Anders."  Andreson comes from "son of Andre."  They're not actually alternate spellings of the same name.  Monkeyzpop (talk) 06:09, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Andreson, Anderson or Andersen? 

message: It's Lubinsky.  The only references that say Lupinsky are sites that copy the misspelled WP entry. Monkeyzpop (talk) 08:25, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lubinsky or Lupinsky
Talk:Filippo Mazzei

message: Does some one Help me to improve this page about this Italian American poitical philosopher?
Thank you
Yes, I'd like to help.  I need to learn some more about Wikipedia and how to contribute appropriately.
J.L.  173.48.102.95 (talk) 20:14, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There are some Spanish sentences at the end of the biography section. Can someone translate or delete them?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.88.241.8 (talk) 10:46, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Error/Language
Talk:Winkel tripel projection

message: What does "tripel" mean, though?
: It's German for "triple".85.119.130.132 13:59, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

message: I will be replacing images on the various map projection pages. Presently many are on a satellite composite image from NASA that, while realistic, poorly demonstrates the projections because of dark color and low contrast. I have created a stylization of the same data with much brighter water areas and a light graticule to contrast. See the thumbnail of the example from another article. Some images on some pages are acceptable but differ stylistically from most articles; I will replace these also.
The images will be high resolution and antialiased, with 15° graticules for world projections, red, translucent equator, red tropics, and blue polar circles.
Please discuss agreement or objections over here (not this page). I intend to start these replacements on 13 August. Thank you.
Strebe (talk) 22:49, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Replace low-contrast images

message: The article says this is only one of three projections proposed by Oswald Winkel. Why is there no info on his other two projections? 164.58.171.152 (talk) 02:13, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: They’ve never been used in a real map, as far as I know. Start here, maybe. Winkel I, Winkel II. This being Wikipedia, feel free to add articles or add to articles. Strebe (talk) 02:57, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Winkel's other projections 

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Winkel triple projection SW.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on December 28, 2014. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2014-12-28. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:58, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello again, Crisco 1492. The caption looks fine. Many thanks for the continued good work. Strebe (talk) 03:29, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

text: *A pleasure, as always. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:08, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Winkel triple projection SW.jpg]]

message: How would a transverse Winkel Tripel look like?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:119F:2E9:2F00:54EE:367B:B9A4:FD69 (talk) 07:40, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transverse?
Talk:Establishments and installations of the Singapore Police Force

message: CNB is not under SPF. It is another organisation under the MHA. Although CNB is located at the Police Cantoment Complex, it should not be placed here.
:Done. Anyhow, be bold and go ahead to edit in any of our other articles as you see fit. ;)--Huaiwei 13:24, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled