lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Sofia's Hair 4 Health

message: Rodolfo Valentin was the designer of the first hair prosthesis in the world. IT IS CORRECTLY TRUE.
Rodolfo Valentin designed the first hair prosthesis in the world in 1973.In fact he creates it for his mother a chemotherapy patient losing her hair.  Before then,people losing their hair due to chemotherapy treatments only had available regular wigs that were very uncomfortable and keep felling off from their head and giving them bad allergic reactions from the contact with the material and the foreign hair.
The difference between wig and hair prosthesis is that a wig does not uses hypoallergenic material (inexistent until few decades ago)…and the double tape (invented for medical reasons) is also available from few decades ago. Rodolfo used that tape to hold the wig in the head of the patients when getting “bald” after chemotherapy, and slowly adding special pin-clips to hold it when the hair returned to grow back again.
Rodolfo was the designer of taking the cranial mold, use a hypoallergenic material to create a base where to attach the ventilated hair (one by one) making sure that the hair does not touch the over sensitive cranial skin to avoid sores.
He called it "cancer wig" and some people still do, the name of "hair prosthesis" came out for insurance purposes,because insurances only cover "prosthesis" from there the name of "hair prosthesis" ( prostheses) for plural.
:: Hair prosthesis has been around for thousands of years. As have leg, arm, nose prosthetics.
::Cancer wigs have been around for much longer than 1973. Please take your advertising and false statements out of wikipedia. you are spamming.Walker42 22:10, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

message: I don't agree in merging the articles. Sofia's hair for health is a CHARITY article, Rodolfo Valentin is a BIOGRAPHY article. 
I feel the article ( Sofia's hair for health) is very substantial, and very valuable information for people that are having chemotherapy and cannot afford to buy an expensive hair prosthesis ( more than 4 thousand dollars, as it was my situation)... How many people in this world are ready to give their own money away to help others?. I think this article deserves a page in its own.Nicole reutman (talk) 12:57, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do not merge article 

message: The two articles should be kept individual. they are two different things. they shouldn't be merged. Also your statement about that "you didn't have opposition is because there were only a few days since you sugested that. Anyway let me tell you that you have improved Rodolfo Valentin biography very very well.Susy parker (talk) 02:21, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rodolfo Valentin, and Sofia's hair for health
Talk:Alice Ambrose

message: — Assignment last updated by RudyCarnap (talk) 12:40, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: PHIL 390 Contemporary Philosophy
Talk:Alice du Pont Mills

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- KGV  (Talk) 10:41, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Alice Stewart Trillin

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- KGV  (Talk) 08:55, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: Ripped off from her New York Times obit. 2604:2000:1580:425C:AD67:D37A:B9A7:260B (talk) 06:30, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Plagiary!
Talk:Helen Edmundson

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. --KenWalker | Talk 05:45, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:John IV, Duke of Brabant

message: I've edited this article the same way I've edited the Dutch article on John IV of Brabant and added sources were possible. I've read over it several times, but it's always appreciated if a native speaker checks whether I haven't made any silly grammatical mistakes :) Gadifere (talk) 17:47, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I tidied it up a bit. Looks good! Oreo Priest talk 20:10, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  added sources & edited article
Talk:Cry Turmoil / SWAT Kats Unplugged

message: There are two articles written on this episode, Cry Turmoil / SWAT Kats Unplugged and Cry Turmoil / Swat Kats Unplugged.  I don't know which one is the proper capitalization, but all the information should be merged into the correctly titled article, with the other one redirecting. Mysdaao 22:58, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Black Crypt

message: At some point the article says "see inset". I don't think there is an inset (anymore). --82.170.113.123 (talk) 21:44, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "see inset" 
Talk:Battles of Zhawar

message: I'm assuming this is the same Zhawar Kili located in Khost Province, not Paktia Province. I also noted that the Dawri Gar mountain near Zhawar is also located in Khost Province near the border with Pakistan. This needs to be revised.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.94.221.133 (talk) 23:25, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Location?
Talk:John Say

message: John's father is given as John Say here, but with a birth year of "before 1445."  If John Say was born in 1415 then the father would have been before 1415. Not sure if this is a typo or an error in the father's information altogether.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.36.204.215 (talk) 22:18, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Father's Birth Year
Talk:Alvin Tresselt

message: Hello. I just was wandering through and noticed that the bibliography was missing a few titles and gave reprint dates as original publication dates in a couple of cases, so i did some upgrading. I did not check every title, just the ones i knew to be missing or wrong from my own personal collection. -- catherine yronwode, not logged in 75.101.104.17 (talk) 01:24, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wandered by and fixed some bibliographical data
Talk:Alyssa Peterson

message: If the US Army left out the true motive of her death as to be suicide, including its reason (no PR work will ever save the Army image (today we have Internet, this is not the 50s-60s-70s) in the future after Iraq), it's pretty certain this girl was actually murdered.  No doubt about that!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.51.128.228 (talk) 23:03, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Killed
Talk:John Uroš

message: The atricle on John Uroš attributes two different husbands to his daughter Helen:
In the summary:  "wife of Demetrios I Kantakouzenos"
In the chapter "Family": "Theodoros Kantakouzenos, with whom she had Irene Kantakouzene"
Which one is right?
In the article on Irene Kantakouzene her father is indicated as Demetrios Kantakouzenos.
Who are the real parents of Irene Kantakouzene?
--W.ehrlich (talk) 21:14, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Husband of Helen, daughter of John Uros
Talk:John, Duke of Berry

message: This article only seriously cites a single article from Richard K. Emmerson's Key Figures in Medieval Europe: An Encyclopedia (2013), which is not a strong enough source for much of the material on this page. Numerous books have been written on topics touching on Jean de Berry, including a multi-volume series specifically on his life which is nowhere cited here. Much of the information on this page is not cited, there is a ton of information missing or overly simplified, and there are at least a few potential errors such as the date that Jean returned from captivity in England. Had I the time, I would re-write this entire article, but I do not at present. Some material on the reconquest of Poitou can be brought over from the French article, but other material, specifically relating to the Armagnac-Burgundian Civil War, needs further expansion. His role in the Cabochien Revolt is not stated, nor are most of his activities after 1392. Jean was also not lieutenant of Normandy, Philippe le Hardi was, so the duke had nothing to do with the Harelle (he was in Languedoc at the time). Jean's formal title in the south was "lieutenant en Languedoc" and he did not lose that title when Charles VI took power in 1388; indeed, he actually went to Languedoc during that time. In other words, there are a lot of issues with this article that need to be improved. I recommend as a starting point Françoise Lehoux, Jean de France, duc de Berri. Sa vie. 4 vols. (Paris: Picard, 1966-1968). – Whaleyland (Talk • Contributions) 06:54, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improved Referencing 

message: I may be missing something obvious to an expert, but how is John, Duke of Berry identified as a member of the House of Valois-Burgundy?
That cadet branch of Valois starts with his brother Philip. 
If John had left a male lineage after him they would normally be considered another cadet branch like those of his brothers, probably under the name Valois-Berry. But he didn't.
Should not John, consequently, merely be identified as a son of John II and a member of the House of Valois? Random noter (talk) 21:27, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course. Surtsicna (talk) 23:07, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  House of Valois-Burgundy
Talk:Andalib Suleiman

message: I added links so that there would be references to this article. I did not remove the tag though, because I could not find verifications for much of what was written. Leppi 07:08, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Andre de Toth

message: 1913, according to Find-a-grave photo of tombstone.. Odd. Stetsonharry (talk) 23:34, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Birth year

message: The subject’s name is presented incorrectly. It should be de Toth. 2A01:4C8:825:823D:7804:A0F4:76AC:CC29 (talk) 14:08, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: See Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests. Moonraker (talk) 15:39, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed move to Andre de Toth
Talk:André Delvaux

message: damn, where are all his movies??? is there any copyright holder?
83.208.14.127 23:18, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of barons of Austria-Hungary

message: This article is complete nonsense.
a) You have to differ between the several kinds of barons. (landed, old, new etc.)
b) If you ever would have adressed a baron with "Gnädiger Herr", you would be killed by him in a fight
c) The list is senseless, because I) no one knows the complete list of austrian barons, but it must be a list of some thousands! II) Some of them never where barons, and some of them where counts. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.118.159.100 (talk • contribs) 
Rather than complaining, do you have some constructive comments or edits to make? The list is not intended to be exhaustive. Charles 00:17, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Juan Carvajal (cardinal)

message: The phrase "the reputation of an unspotted priesthood" (1) is unacceptably vague; (2) it is POV-Catholic, and its application outside that faith is uncertain; (3) it is borrowed from a text which makes no pretense to being fair and balanced; (4) the article is written in the eulogistic style, inappropriate to an encyclopedia entry, and the offending quote is part of that uncritical style.  Does the phrase refer to the subject's adherence to diplomatic procedures (as perhaps implied by the paragraph)?  Does it refer to his following the oath of poverty, chastity and obedience?  Does it refer to his being free from sin?  Does it refer to his carrying out the regulations of his profession, e.g. saying Mass daily, reciting the Breviary?  In the context of Carvajal's career, does it mean he was never heretical or schismatic?  The article already has plenty of testimonials. I strongly suggest deletion of the phrase, even though it is a quotation.  --Vicedomino (talk) 03:24, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "the reputation of an unspotted priesthood" 

message: I did not fact-check the article, but the sources and inline citations look appropriate, as does the scope. The article would benefit greatly from attention to organisation and flow, particularly for the content that is now in the "Life and work" section (including its subsections). At present it reads like a sequence of facts, and it's easy to lose sense of context. —Ringbang (talk) 14:48, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: B-class review
Talk:Elizabeth Fitzalan, Duchess of Norfolk

message: The article says Elizabeth Goushill was born 1404 and Joan Goushill was born 1409.  These are clearly not right, as their father Robert Goushill died at the Battle of Shrewsbury on 21 July 1403 (David Faris, Plantagenet Ancestry of Seventeenth-Century Colonists, 2nd ed., p. 145).  Charles M. Hansen says Joan was aged two and Elizabeth was aged one at the time of their father's death on 21 July 1403, citing Robert Goushill's Inquisition post-mortem, which means they were born about 1401 and 1402 respectively (The American Genealogist 67:99-100 [1992]).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:558:6017:157:6886:30B9:CF4F:A3BC (talk) 00:00, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

message: Margaret de Mowbray (b. 1388), married Sir Robert Howard (1385 - 1436), and from this marriage descended Queens consort Anne Boleyn and Catherine 
This Robert Howard links to the wrong Robert.
--GvN (talk) 10:47, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  link
Talk:Antigone Rising

message: I have added "speedy delete" templates on the articles for the Henderson sisters and Dena Tauriello as being not notable outside of the band. Biographical info on these pages, and external links, could be transferred to this article to improve it. I did not tag Cassidy as she has info relating to activities outside of the band. LessHeard vanU 23:12, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lawrence Booth

message: L'honorable, there's no need to add quotations repeating material already in the article, and already cited, using from a book from back in 1841. We only need to say a given fact once. Hchc2009 (talk) 23:36, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Repetition of material... 

message: The first para in the first section reads:  -- is it me, or is this a little incoherent? CassiantoTalk 00:05, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it is. I have no idea where it came from - I don't actively research post-1300 English bishops and archbishops, I just try to keep them from degenerating too far. Ealdgyth - Talk 00:07, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  ...and a wonderful job you do to. I'll set about sorting it out then.  But I'm without sources, so not wanting to rely on poetic licence, I may end up deleting it altogether. CassiantoTalk 01:53, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  You have access to the ODNB? The article on him there is reasonably complete. If you don't, I can email you a copy if you drop me an email. (I'm like swamped in RL which is why I'm barely editing) Ealdgyth - Talk 00:20, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  , I do have ODNB.  Currently I'm on holiday 6,000 miles away so I don't have the access right now.  I return on Wednesday, so I can fix it then. CassiantoTalk 01:44, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:   does this mean you are now going to make extra efforts to reimprove this article? L'honorable (talk) 03:15, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

text:  You do not need poetic licence, either of you - it is all to be seen in Burke's. ODNB is biographical whereas Burke's is genealogical - Wiki aspires to be both. So here the case is that: Lawrence was very much the younger but illegitimate son of John Booth. His very much elder brother William spotted his younger sibling's ability & pushed him towards the Church. Here biography & genealogy combine (so it is good to have an understanding of both!). Another son (of John Booth) Sir Robert had the dosh or cash or financial clout, howsoever you wish to put it nowadays, to propel his younger brother to greater heights. The two were intertwined & they succeeded well in their gameplan. It would have been nigh on impossible to become Archbishop of York in those days without financial clout. L'honorable (talk) 00:45, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

text: L'honorable, I think best to restrict all communications between us through the Kangaroo court that is ANI. Anywhere else could compromise any such sanctions you seek to impose upon us. CassiantoTalk 01:46, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Now you have linked it I understand - but please give over - are you deliberately trying to cause mischief? L'honorable (talk) 02:34, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Now for something entirely different...
Talk:Lê Thánh Tông

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class.  Referencing and appropriate inline citation guidelines not met.   With appropriate citations and references, this article would easily qualify as B class if not higher.   --dashiellx (talk) 19:27, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 
Talk:Christmas (Baby Please Come Home)

message: I just saw season 1, episode 9, of Damon Wayans, Lethal Weapon - Jingle Bell Glock and heard an unknown (to me) cover version of this song at the end of the episode. Maybe someone can figure out who it was and annotate the main entry? Ranugad (talk) 04:43, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  cover version used in TV Series 

message: In recent weeks, chart positions of the song from Rolling Stone's Top 100 Songs chart have been added to this article, but the artist they list is "Various Artists". Is it possible that this is really the Darlene Love recording, but Rolling Stone is listing it as "Various Artists" because of the album from which the track originated? But then when I see another listing for "Sleigh Ride" by The Ronettes on the same chart, that explanation doesn't quite hold water.  Sliv812 (talk) 20:26, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Various Artists" version
Talk:Leonello d'Este

message: there is an error in Reference No 31, could sbd fix it? Thank you, Aris de Methymna (talk) 19:40, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Huon (talk) 19:51, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference 
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Classical music/Newsletter

message: A few questions that I'm throwing out there about this:  
* I'm assuming this will be automatically be placed on users' talk pages or something.  How exactly will that work?  Will it be by a bot or a user (Alton?)?  Will users be able to choose options as far as the delivery is concerned (e.g. a different page than the talk page, a digest)?  
* Kudos on the Classical works lists on the first issue.  
* Will archiving be done by a bot?  
* There needs to be some kind of a box at the top of the main talk page directing people here if they want a request.  
* Will participants be able to opt out?  
* Will there be a limit on the number of articles featured in the newsletter, and, if so, how will they be chosen?  
* The articles needing help and collaboration headings should have links to articles explaining what exactly they mean (what does collaboration mean how does it differ from the former?).  
* I don't really like the name.  wp:cp just looks bad, and it is uninformative to someone who doesn't know what it is.  Something catchy or even "Classical Music WikiProject Newsletter" would be far more appealing.  
* A separate archive for the hints would be a good idea.  It would be good if that archive was categorized, too.  
* Who writes this thing? (Alright.  I know who is currently writing it, but how can people help to write it?  Will Alton just stay in charge of the whole thing?)
* Requests for hints (a good idea by the way)?  
These are just a few thoughts that I came up with looking at the newsletter page.   I'm sure that I will come up with more.  Feedback is welcome.  Asmeurer (talk  ♬ contribs) 23:16, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the work (despite my nitpick below).  One thing I just noticed is that there's two lists of participnants:  the list at the Participants project subpage, and the Category page.  They don't look identical; the /participants list looks longer...I'm guessing the category's generated by the userbox?  Which list will generate the distribution?  Or are you thinking of making a third list?  I don't envy the headaches :-)  —Turangalila talk 15:55, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I also think this newsletter is a great idea, and would like to be on the distribution list (I'm in the participants list but not the category).  Thanks all for your work on this.  Antandrus  (talk) 16:00, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Looks like a good thing
Talk:Alaska Department of Military and Veterans Affairs

message: Any info about how many people are in it?  Smallbones (talk) 17:12, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

message: My, we seem to be really going out of our way to point out that the Governor has no authority over and is not in the Chain of Command for the Alaska National Guard.  Seems to be drifting off into politically motivated commentary rather than being encyclopedic. Look at the entry the state from which the last Governor for a national ticket came from, Arkansas.  Alaska should mirror that, otherwise the entries are crap.  I will clean it up in a day or two.  --Geneb1955 (talk) 22:24, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chain of Command 
Talk:Anita Borg

message: This page was vandalized by User:Hypoxide. Vandalism reverted.--Cerejota 23:37, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism

message: This page should confirm or deny that Anita Borg's name is a possible source of the name of "The Borg" on Star Trek.  This question is asked in practically every article on the net about her.  (Of course, another possible source of the name is "cyborg".) It would be nice to be able to lay this question to rest without having to look through other articles.  72.179.63.75 (talk) 01:10, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Doubtful. A Borg hotel exists off US101 a little North of where Anita lived, but neither had anything to do with each other.  Near Coyote Point which does raise an issue: Anita did like to windsurf. 8^) 99.11.227.190 (talk) 18:14, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The" Borg
Talk:South Staffordshire line

message: South Staffordshire Line
from north-east to south-west
Main Section
--- Line diverged from Wichnor Junction (1849-)
Lichfield Trent Valley (1847-)
--- For Trent Valley Line (Later West Coast Main Line) (1849-1964)
Lichfield City (1849-)
--- For Sutton Coldfield-Lichfield Line (1886-1964)
Hammerwich (1849-1965)
Brownhills (1849-1965)
Pelsall (1849-1965)
Rushall (1849-1909)
Walsall (1849-)
Wednesbury (1850-1950), Wednesbury Town (1950-1964)
Great Bridge (1850-1950), Great Bridge North (1950-1964)
--- For Darlaston Loop (1863-1887)
Dudley Port Low Level (1850-1964)
--- For Stour Valley Line (Later WCML) (1852-1964)
Dudley (1860-1964)
--- For trains to Stourbridge and Wolverhampton (1860-1964)
--- Also location of Dudley Freightliner Terminal (1967-1989)
Dudley-Stourbridge Section
Dudley Southside and Netherton (1878-1921), Blowers Green (1921-1962)
--- For Bumble Hole Line (1878-1964)
Harts Hill (1895-1916)
Round Oak (1852-1962)
--- Site of Round Oak Steel Terminal (1997-)
Brierley Hill (1858-1962)
Brettell Lane (1852-1962)
--- For the Wombourne Branch (1925-1932)
Stourbridge Junction (1852-)
--- For Kidderminster, Worcester Shrub Hill and Oxford (1852-1964). For Old Hill and Halesowen (1866-1964). Also for freight destinations in the South West (1852-)
I've replaced the previous info-box with a route box. As I haven't reproduced all the information that was previously included, I've copied it the original here so that it can be used in future.  – Tivedshambo (talk) 23:19, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for retaining this somewhere. Took me hours ;) Worley-d 14:07, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I sense the line will reopen tomorrow 😂😂 JoshuaIsTheFalco (talk) 15:37, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Magic crystal ball