Talk:Mutual masturbation

message: The modern cinematic emporium
    Is not a mere super-sensorium—
        But a highly effectual
        Heterosexual
    Mutual masturbatorium.
—Anonymous. First heard by this contributor circa 1963.
"Common positions include either lying down next to one another, sitting down next to each other or standing:" - what other positions are there? porge 09:05, Oct 4, 2004 (UTC)
:on another and combinations lysdexia 07:15, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: I have to put this somewhere, and it certainly doesn't belong in the article...

message: I just reverted a paragraph that was deleted.  I scanned the article and found no other references to "circle jerks", so I don't see what it was deleted for being redundant.  It's significantly different from mutual masturbation in which the partners actually are (or actually admit to being) sexual partners, so I think it deserves a mention. --Icarus 22:17, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  I certainly agree... a circle jerk is related to mutual masturbation in a small way but to every man or boy that has participated in one, it is completely different and deserves it's own section or even a separate article. I propose either reintroducing the circle jerk section or making circle jerk its own article instead of the redirect to mutual masturbation. Thoughts? JAK83 06:46, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Circle Jerk' is redundant? 

message: Is there a reason why this is a separate article from Masturbation? Looks like not a whole lot of activity around here lately, but I'm going to hold off on actually proposing a merge until I get some more opinions. Just seems unnecessary to have two different articles, when this could be a section of the other, but maybe I'm wrong. romarin [talk ] 02:05, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Masturbation]]? 

message: any particular reason why "ookie cookie" was deleted? if there's no objection, i'd like to add it again, because this is a common term in some, uh, circles 141.158.124.162 06:35, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "ookie cookie" 

message: Does the picture really have to be one of a nun and monk? What does that add? I am not against a picture, just against one that seems like it could offend people for no reason. That said, I don't feel like doing a GIS on mutual masturbation to find one ;) Oreo man 03:38, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: This section seems to get too much into specific information that is necessary. I'm not sure how else to explain my issue with it. I am not against graphic descriptions in articles, but this section seems to include information that is not the norm. For example, the beginning where it talks about a circle jerk contest and the loser eating the semen of the winner. And the part which includes food. Just seems that these facts are events that probably have occured, but are not the norm for circle jerks. Maybe I just had an uneventful childhood and haven't experienced yet, but it just doesn't seem to belong, unless someone can cite a source that says this is normal. Stoneice02 04:48, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. A piece of bread?  why not include the fact that many times, a towel (either terry cloth or paper) may be used to clean up?  or perhaps a mop using chlorine bleach?  or that some people pass a glass around to ejaculate into that? Come to think of it, how about a reference to everyone chipping in for a hotel room and how that's put on the organizer's credit card??? I think it's getting a little excessive.Redheaded dude 01:48, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Simply saying, "I agree" would have sufficed. lol Stoneice02 02:00, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Circle Jerk 

message: The page could stand on it's own provided that it has some sort of references and it would probably be best if the section about consuming a semen soaked cookie was removed altogether. That's one aspect of the sexual practise and there probably are countless more out there.
If we were to start listing all possible sexual habits then it would really eat up a lot of cyberspace. 
For the time being I vote for it's complete removal unless we can adequately reference it. Mr.georgemark 20:13 6th Oct. 2006
I don't see a need for complete removal, as it's actually a well-written article and pretty informative at that. References are clearly needed though if for no other reason than to prevent people from needlessly adding their own uncited inclusions of the terminology used in their particular social circles (although for the purpose of wikification is obviously the biggest reason). SINsApple 06:09, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Mutual Masturbation]] lacks any sort of references 

message: The discussion is taking place on Talk:Frottage.  Please add your pennysworth there.  --Simon Speed 23:29, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Outercourse]] and [[Frottage]]