lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Coadjutor bishop

message: To me, the position of Bishop of Turku does not seem at all relevant to Coadjutor Bishops. In Anglican terms, the role is similar to that of a suffragan bishop (or assistant bishop), who assists a diocesan bishop, often over a defined geographical area, but has no expectation of succeeding to the main see. There is an even more direct parallel in the office of the Suffragan Bishop of Dover, who is also called "Bishop in Canterbury" and runs the diocese of Canterbury on behalf of the Primate. Myopic Bookworm 16:17, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If anything, the Bishop of Turku should go in an article about auxiliaries or suffragans, unless someone can show that the bishop has a right of succession and not just a mere likelihood or that in the usage of the church the bishop is referred to as "coadjutor".  From the text removed from the article, it seems that neither of these are the case. Pmadrid 22:50, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

text: Yes, that is correct that coadjutor is not historically linked to succession.  My point, however, is that since it is now linked to succession post 1983 code it would be a saving point that would allow an office not specifically called "coadjutor" to appear in this article. Pmadrid 05:32, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

text: In fact, this article could use a history of the coadjutor in addition to the current explanation of its modern usage. Pmadrid 05:34, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relevance of Turku? 
Talk:Cope

message: The article says: "It (i.e. the Cope) is now the vestment assigned to the celebrant, whether priest or bishop, for almost all functions in which the chasuble is not used, for example in processions, in the greater blessings and consecrations, at the solemnly celebrated Liturgy of the Hours, in giving Benediction of the Blessed Sacrament, and the celebration of other sacraments outside of Mass."  Is it worn by a Deacon who does these where allowed? Richardson mcphillips1 (talk) 20:09, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The cope can be worn by a deacon as it is a vestment proper to all ranks of clergy. The cope can be worn when the deacon is the celebrant or assistant for the solemn recitation for the Divine Office. Deacons also may wear the cope for processions. This information could be included in the article, but the use of the cope by a deacon is very rarely seen today. Dgf32 (talk) 19:49, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Use by deacon

message: sorry, I posted a question, then saw the answer was in the text, then when I tried to remove the question I accidentally removed everything from the page.  My apologies. Richardson mcphillips1 (talk) 20:12, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The previous data is now restored MishaPan (talk) 21:15, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  sorry 

message: First, why is a firman of a non-existent state "unalterable"?  Would the other religious communities really mind if he didn't use it, as long as he stuck to his own territory at the appointed time? And second, what "anomaly" is evident?  --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 21:54, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Patriarch of Jerusalem 

message: This man has brought the Church into very great disrepute through the paedophilic abuse of his nephews, and through the cover-ups which protected him to the extent of making prosecution impossible. The Church seems still to be protecting him, which is more than somewhat scandalous.
Is it right, therefore, that he be taken as an exemplar in any shape or form for what constitutes ecclesiastical activities?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.220.152.171 (talk) 00:34, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vangheluwe picture 
Talk:Easter Vigil

message: The Eastern Orthodox section is a correct description of the wrong service. The Byzantine equivalent of the Easter Vigil is the Vesperal Liturgy of St. Basil, held on the morning of Holy Saturday. At this service, the prophecies are read and catechumens are baptized. The midnight Liturgy is equivalent to the Mass of Easter Day in the Latin Rite. (In the Byzantine Rite, all the services of Holy Week take place half a day early.) - BALawrence 05:25, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The Divine Liturgy does not start at midnight, but some time later after Matins. There is really no service called "Easter Vigil" in Orthodoxy, although this (or "Paschal Vigil") is often used casually. A "Vigil" in Orthodox terms is a specific service, and neither the Vesperal Liturgy on Saturday (which occurs in the morning in parishes, but not in monasteries) nor the aggregation described here as that best corresponding to what is done in the West is really that. In, again, casual speech either service might be called by this name, and if you Google for it you'll find both at various Orthodox websites. TCC (talk) (contribs) 05:58, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Obviously the rites are different, which is why they are different rites. That shouldn't mean no comparisons can be drawn at all; an afterfeast is an equivalent of an octave, a paramony of a Vigil (meaning the day) and so forth after all. With that adaption, the Saturday late morning service seems to be the equivalent of the "Easter Vigil", while the Easter Night service seems to be a service which does not have a direct correspondence, though in German it might be called Ostermette in analogy to the Christmette (-mette for Matins) which is a term for the Christmas Midnight Mass (sometimes, and probably originally which would explain the name, held in combination with Matins).--131.159.76.179 (talk) 18:16, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Orthodox section

message: Shouldn't #4 be the Litugry of the Eucharist, not just the word EUcharist?
: Not done: According to the page's protection level you should be able to edit the page yourself. If you seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. – AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs)  10:10, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  SECTION: Catholic Church
Talk:Acolyte

message: IMO this doesn't need to be on the main page, given that there's a list on the disambiguration page.  Especially since the semi-heading indicates "This article refers to religious acolytes."
Yoda921 13:51, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fictional Usage 

message: Hello InfernoXV! Thanks for helping improve the article. I really appreciate it. In my opinion, I felt that it was best to put the Churches in alphabetical order to avoid any biases towards a particular Church. I apologize for the confusion with my usage of the word denomination. As a compromise, I will accept your current version with a slight modification: Many Anglicans do not consider themselves Protestants but view themselves as a catholic Church along with Orthodoxy, and Catholicism. In light of this fact and WP:NPOV, I am alphabetizing the Churches listed under the Western Christianity heading. Eastern Christianity can appropriately precede the Churches listed under Western Christianity. If you would like, you can use the alternative term Latin Rite Christianity (for Roman Catholicism), which will place the Church after Anglican Tradition but before Methodism. I look forward to hearing from you soon. Thanks in advance for your understanding. With warm regards, AnupamTalk 03:59, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Church Order 

message: I noted that crucifers are somewhat distinguished from other acolytes in the Methodist/Lutheran section but not in the Anglican section, where they should have the same distinction. This isn't a very important change (so I didn't presume to change it) but I thought it might want changing.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.241.19.71 (talk) 21:41, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Back in antiquity, when I was an Episcopal acolyte, crucifer was just a position among the acolytes. We all wanted it, so it was usually the oldest boy present. We also had the flag bearer (can't remember his exact title) and the "escorts" who escorted the flag carrier. 155.213.224.59 (talk) 15:19, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Acolyte/crucifer 

message: There should be some mention of acolytes in use by traditional Catholic churches and Sedevacantists.75.27.148.62 (talk) 05:32, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Traditional Latin-Rite Catholics and Sedes 
Talk:Centreless wheel

message: It has been proposed to merge the Orbital wheel with the Hubless wheel article. I would strongly agree. It seems to me like the Osmos wheel described in the Orbital wheel article is a special case of the Hubless wheel, where the axle is round, hollow and only slightly smaller then the wheel itself. The Hubless wheel article only mentions the Osmos Wheel as an example anyway. There are other examples of hubless wheels, like the Hailfire droid from Star Wars or some Monowheel designs. In those other designs, there is not really such thing as an "axle" anymore. Instead, the Wheel is stiff and connected to the machine inside the wheel at just a few places. 
So, is there a reason against merging them all into one article?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Krystman (talk • contribs) 15:40, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Osmos Wheel 

message: I'm a bit confused. If it realy was inveted that late what was this? Dieſelmaus (talk) 22:12, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  First centerless wheel 

message: It seems reasonable to merge the Hubless wheel in India stub to here. Klbrain (talk) 22:10, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 18:39, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Heinrich LXXII, Prince Reuss of Lobenstein and Ebersdorf

message: He wasn't a count but a prince and his name wasn't  Reuss zu Schleiz. Känsterle 07:32, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You are correct on both counts.  The article is now fixed, and I have removed the "disputed" tag. --BlueMoonlet 05:53, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Grim's Ditch (Harrow)

message: I've removed the following comment from the article: "It was once believed to be the county top of Middlesex, along with Bushey Heath (155m, 509ft) until recent maps converted Middlesex into Hertfordshire, which the highest point being Pavis wood in Tring." This is bollocks. Middlesex is now entirely within Greater London - none of it has been "converted into Hertfordshire". Some of the other parts of the article needs substantial work, too. Grutness...wha? 07:34, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal

message: I have left the History section virtually untouched but it needs an expert's attention cos:
* we think that Grim is synonymous with Stromkarl or Nix rather than Woden. (Though Nix don't seem to be the sort to go building earthworks.)
* the origin of name discussion should be in Grim's Ditch not here.
* Just to clear things up, Grim is synonymous with the Norse god Woden, as there is a stone carved sign explaining this towards the higher end of the Bushey Country Club.  
-- RHaworth 18:09, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: History

message: Comment Heh, where's the discussion? You need to provide a rationale for the merger, surely? Anyway, here's my two pennyworth:
*Merge, but the other way around. Grim's Dyke Golf Club, House and Hotel appear not to be called Grim's Ditch Hotel, etc. Whereas the Anglo-Saxon feature appears to be referred to by both sobriquets. Kbthompson (talk) 11:51, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal
Talk:Brooks Range

message: Numerous four letter words and lewd phrases have been scattered about throughout this article.
 
216.74.244.66 22:17, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I reverted all of the vandalism. -- Spireguy 23:10, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism! 

message: Why isn't there a map showing where the range runs?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.116.65.118 (talk) 03:55, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  MAP!!! 

message: While links exist, the Romanzof and Endicott need to be mentioned. And likely others. 143.232.210.38 (talk) 21:38, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need a better accounting of sub-ranges 

message: I find it very strange that the article doesn't go into the formation of the range, the forces at work on it, the composition of the range and all the other aspects which could be seen as "geological".--Quisqualis (talk) 03:16, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  February 2021: No geology section--Why?
Talk:Yasmin Warsame

message: I don't think you can contest the fame of Yasmin Warsame. She has been on the covers of all the major magazines (American, Italian Vogue, Elle etc. etc.) and on the catwalks of several of the most famous couture designers. On top of that she one of the few African topmodels. Quite notable and enough reason to include her in Wikipedia.
Please consult somebody who knows the fashion industry before you make a decision.
:I removed the speedy delete tag because it seems clear that there was an assertion of notability in the article, albeit it was a bit buried in the text. S710, you may want to familiarize yourself with some of Wikipedia's standards (ie, the Manual of Style and Guide to Layout) to make sure no one else contests the article. For instance, the first few sentences should state Warsame's occupation and prominence. hateless 08:09, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Clean enough to remove the tag ?? S710 08:18, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleaned Up

message: Per recent discussion, I can find no justification for the listings under the See also section. Failing substantial reasoning, I will remove them again shortly. - SummerPhD (talk) 20:17, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, per the discussion, you have been given substantial reasons (not that that was even necessary; the connection between the models is obvious to anyone). Anyone can see that they're related articles; you're the only one who can't, or rather refuses to. You also haven't provided any substantial reasons for their removal. You've only insisted that they're "not related", and alluded to some bizarre Alice Cooper connection. What on Earth does Alice Cooper have to do with any of these women let alone Iman? Is he a woman? No. Is he Somali? No. Is he a model? No. Is he in any way related to any of these women? No. Worked with them, perhaps? No. Are they inspirations/mentors for him? No. Like I said, no reasons have been provided for the removal of these See Also links (which isn't even supported by WP:SEEALSO anyway), only for their inclusion. Middayexpress (talk) 22:11, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: See also

message: Both born in Mogadishu, both moved to Toronto right around the same time, same last name, and they even went to the 2009 Polaris gala together. Can anybody clarify if and how she's related to K'naan? Sister, cousin, just a coincidence? Bearcat (talk) 22:07, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question 

message: Is she really an actress? Danidamiobi (talk) 20:18, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Really an actress?
Talk:Claudius Clavus

message: Is the ö in his patronymic a quirk of some sort? What are its sources? In our Scandinavian languages, it should not be ö, rather an o suffices - or in later Danish, e 
Danish: Claudius Claussen Swart... Swedish: Claudius Clausson Swart. First name is obviously a Latinization of Claus, Klas, Claes, diminutive of Nicholas. Patronymic is the same name's non-Latinized version. Writing of Swart (black) depends mostly on how thewy wrote.
When I first saw the name's ö I thought is this again some fictional character with similarly built unreal name as Hägar the Hörrible...
To me, it seems that the ö in patronymic lacks a real basis. What if an earlier source, such as Catholic E, has made an error. Such should not be perpetuated. Finlandais 07:50, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Danish wouldn't use Ö. In old Danish, it might have been "Claussøn". Modern spelling would be Claussen. Valentinian (talk) / (contribs) 23:21, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Danish name is Claudius Claussøn Swart and the Latin name was Claudius Clavus (without an "I" in the surname.) The latter is the name used by the Great Danish Encyclopedia and Dansk Biografisk Leksikon, so I'm moving the article there. Valentinian (talk) / (contribs) 23:21, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: More here:
* .
 — LlywelynII 14:26, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources for future article expansion
Talk:Solid Base

message: The final song on the album keeps being changed from the correct name, "I Like It" to either "The Goose is Loose" or "All Hail the Goose". If anyone notices that this happens again, please change it. That said, it does come from a very amusing Ashens video. But it doesn't belong on Wikipedia in this context.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=DHCid-GypGI#t=262s  — Preceding unsigned comment added by GLella (talk • contribs) 05:24, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalisim

message: The content on this is cut and paste from this page which is clearly marked with:
Biography © Remixed Records 1996
Additional information and discography © Niklas Adolfsson 1997-2005
The ball 07:54, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright infringement
Talk:Taqi Usmani

message: GorgeCustersSabre continues to claim everything which presents this man negatively is pushing an agenda when it is factual information. Middle-eastfactcheck (talk) 14:50, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: It is not balanced and even the source isn’t balanced. I don’t mind any negative coverage. I have no axe to grind. I’m not a follower of Muhammad Taqi Usmani. I just want to see the maintenance of a neutral tone. Wikipedia requires citations to reliable and authoritative third-party sources. Two good sets of Wikipedia guidelines that I have found really useful can be found HERE, regarding verifiability and HERE, regarding the need to maintain a neutral point of view. George Custer's Sabre (talk) 14:53, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pushing agendas 

message: Perhaps the sections about books should be separated and moved to a different title like Muhammad Taqi Usmani bibliography and name a few major ones in the Books section of this article. This looks very weird. ─ The Aafī (talk) 15:25, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: What is your idea? ─ The Aafī (talk) 18:20, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:   Ideas? ─ The Aafī on Mobile (talk) 18:24, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with the clean up . We should still mention his most significant works in this article.VR talk 17:57, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks . I'm working on this, and I hope once I fix the bibliography article, I'll try fixing the issues here. Thanks for your kind response. ─ The Aafī on Mobile (talk) 18:00, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of books 
Talk:Fragments: Memories of a Wartime Childhood

message: I've reverted a newly added "See also" section that included only links to Elie Wiesel (already linked in the text) and The Holocaust Industry (an article about the book of that title).  It seemed to me potentially promotional to link to a specific work not otherwise necessary for discussion of Wilkomirski. Robertissimo 06:41, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: how very lenient. The youtube TV documentary on youtube about Wilkomirski delievers rather clear circumstantial evidence: The second Wilkomirski lie was threatened to be blown out of the water, he went to see a lawyer and threatened the accuser with libel suits and other legal action. It seems Wilkomirski was never sued for fraud. His case never came under proper legal scrutiny and he walked off scot free from his lie. --91.60.140.195 (talk) 11:11, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

message: :
How about this instead?
:
Even if you hate that, consider that "(pseudonym)" [no cap!] is implied by the very next words. —Tamfang (talk) 22:26, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  proposed rearrangement
Talk:St Ives, New South Wales

message: Masada College, see http://www.masada.nsw.edu.au is a high school in St. Ives.  Not a primary school.  This is also a link to Masada College so I do not think the word primary should be inserted. Ariconte (talk) 01:14, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Masada College Name
Talk:Billy Rogell

message: Since you requested an assessment, I thought I'd briefly explain my ranking. First, what's good. The article is comprehensive. It gives a rounded view of Rogell's place in baseball and Tigers' history. Many articles of players from this era are just stats put in sentences instead of table. You have good references, which is incredibly important.
Most of my criticisms are smaller issues. There are a few passages that don't really adhere to Neutral Point of View. For instance, "one of the most popular plays in World Series history" and "he and Hall of Fame double-play partner Charlie Gehringer would give the Tigers one of the best keystone-combinations in baseball history." The short version is that subjective statements like these need to be attributed to a published source. Since it seems like you're fairly new here, you  may want to take a look at that policy. It's essential reading for Wikipedia contributors.
One thing this article needs before it could be nominated for good article status in inline citations. They can be pretty time consuming when using print sources, but if you're interested, check out WP:CITE.
It's rare to find editors willing to do the kind of research necessary to write usable articles about lesser-known baseball players. Good work, and I hope you decide to stick around. --Djrobgordon 16:52, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment Notes
Talk:Yuusha-Oh Tanjou! -Mythology Version-

message: If it is exactly spelled this way, I don't have an exact translation for it.
One source claims "sungai" ("immortal"). I would suspect "sungoi" might be related to "Sugoi" ("terrific"). I'm not entirely certain.
All I know is that...Yeah, the hiragana read "SU N GO I." Any ideas? --E. Megas 08:22, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "Sungoi" (すんごい)
Talk:Cymaeans

message: This article should be refactored into Cyme, Cuma and Cyme (Aeolis). "Cymaeans" weren't a "tribe", the word means just "citizens of Cyme". It should be just a redirect, just like Phocaeans, Athenians, Thebans, New Yorkers etc. Plus, this article actually seems to be mixing up two quite unrelated places, that in Euboea and that in Aeolis. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:31, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Ansegisus (disambiguation)

message: Saint Ansegisus is the same as Ansegisus of St-Wandrille (which = Fontenelle). Staffelde 08:37, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Unless you can come up with some evidence that the alleged "A. of Fontanelles [sic], abbot of St-Wandrille" is a different person from Saint Ansegisus etc, you would do better to leave the page alone - and I am not inclined simply to accept your word for it. It looks to me as though you have simply misread something, probably the Catholic Encyclopedia. I am copying this to your talk page. Staffelde 12:43, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Dropsonde

message: Reduced to start-class, since this is apparently a WPTC article. It needs sources and expansion (history of dropsonde use, maybe?). --Coredesat talk! 07:57, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Todo 

message: Would like to know:  What happens at the surface of the sea?  Does the dropsonde float?  Is it recovered and used again?  How much do they cost?  Thanks.
* The last point over the sea is often the most important data measurement. 
* Dropsondes do not float, as their parachute has been modified to induce quickly sinking.
* If dropsondes have been dropped over land (such as in programs such as PLOWS ), some attempts are made to recover, and reuse sondes.  Often, people find them and send them back to NCAR COD.
* For cost, you would need to contact Vaisala, the contract manufacturer.  Nickatncar (talk) 17:28, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  End Use 

message: Aren't dropsondes also used in the detection of submarines and in other military contexts? This article makes it sound like the only meaning of the word is in the meteorology field. Nrbelex (talk) 21:56, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not just for Weather 