Talk:José W. F. Valle

message: Dear Wikipedia Editor Staff
I have recently discovered the wikipedia, I actually knew it, but never really
had the time or the urge to use often. Needless to say I am not acquainted with 
editing or any of that. Nevertheless I felt tempted to start editing the topics 
which touch me more closely, where I felt I could easily improve, namely, in 
physics. And I will do so whenever I find free time, which is not too often. 
I fell also to the temptation of opening the above entry, where verifiable
information is given about myself. It is true, however, that your concern 
is fair about whether this can affect the neutrality of the content. 
Given this I see two possibilities:
1) eliminate the article
2) have it re-edited by someone else, the farther from the scientific "guetto" as possible, if you so desire
I have no objections to either
Thank you for your attention
::of course you're notable by WP, and I cannot readily account for anyone thinking otherwise. In fact, you're so notable by our standards that they article would probably be kept even if you were to object to it. There is no reason why you should not make edits to the article, provided of course you can justify them by references. A slightly more extended but still   non-technical explanation of your work would be very useful. So would a listing of your degrees and institutions, and visiting professorships you may have held elsewhere.  But if you want to reflect even the most stringent interpretation of the rules here, just put them on the talk page & someone will check and transfer them to the article. I apologize for any rudeness others may have expressed or implied. By the way, the convention here is to sign your comments of talk pages with 4 tildes, like this: ~~~~ , which produces your user name and the time. DGG (talk) 20:31, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: 
I feel embarassed by the note in the preamble that the creator of the article is myself. That is why I contemplated earlier the possibility of eliminating the article. Would it be possible if someone else re-edited the article endorsing its content and eliminating the embarassing preamble altogether? I have no idea whether this fits Wikipedia's policies. Thank you very much for your consideration. I must admit that I am finding  Wikipedia to be an extremely useful educational tool. Little by little I hope to contribute to this great project.Jwfvalle (talk) 22:58, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on José W. F. Valle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080619032019/http://www.humboldt-foundation.de/EN/programme/preise/pt.htm to http://www.humboldt-foundation.de/en/programme/preise/pt.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:18, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified