Talk:Slander: Liberal Lies About the American Right

message: The section titled "New York Times Christians/Nazis controversy" has only one source, a post on "World O'Crap," the personal blog of an anonymous person identified only as "Scott C." The use of such a blog as a source, particularly in an article about a living person, is a violation of WP:BLOGS. This section has therefore been removed.71.126.189.217 (talk) 17:28, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Personal blog, anonymous source

message: What, no positive reviews?  Unless there are none, it hardly seems wiki to me. - Anonymous
:I feel that the review section of this article is more to show the controversy over factual errors in the book. It's not really to list reviews, good or bad. Wikipedia shouldn't have book reviews just for fun, but only if there is a notable reason for them. Kushboy 07:15, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reviews

message: :Image:Slander75.jpeg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:52, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Slander75.jpeg

message: ...this article is about 80% criticism.  Gotta love Wikipedia.  No Liberal bias here...just keep moving along. ha ha ha. 138.162.128.53 (talk) 13:37, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ha!  As expected 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Slander: Liberal Lies About the American Right. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060823201135/http://www.editorandpublisher.com:80/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1002763918 to http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1002763918
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:06, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified