Talk:Portishead (band)

message: :Their third album, Alien?, was released in 2003.
When? --Camembert
I guess not yet. Hum. --FvdP 18:48 Jan 9, 2003 (UTC)
Googling reveals there were a lot of rumours about it towards the back end of last year. But sadly, nothing yet. I've tweaked the page to reflect this. --Camembert
i deleted one of the external links, entitled 'portishead expert' as it just pointed to weblog www.robotwisdom.com, which appears to contain no information about portishead whatsoever.
I removed a link to a site about their third album Alien, and Portishead is cited in this article as saying that they are just rumors. Myspace isn't usually credible unless there's a link from the official website. SZadeh 21:31, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see it on Portishead's official page. Perhaps you could link me to where exactly it's located on their website? SZadeh 17:12, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: official site frontpage in bottom right-hand corner. (of course their official site is timing-out as i type this... but trust me, it's true. (And i wish it weren't, as those samples/blog-entries at the myspace page arent impressing me.)) --Quiddity 18:40, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: ..so it's real? D: You would think that they could do better than that. mah. Oh well, thanks :)SZadeh 23:55, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  i am pretty suspicious of that myspace page. Zmbe 00:48, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Alien and Myspace

message: Does anyone know if SATURNINE is a real Portishead project? -- The Anome 00:10, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Saturnine? 

message: :Image:Cowboys.ogg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:12, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Cowboys.ogg

message: :Image:Portishead-logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:12, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Portishead-logo.png

message: :Image:Sour Times.ogg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:39, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Sour Times.ogg

message: Are Sweet Times, Desolation Row, and Melody Nelson among the bootlegs mentioned?68.58.169.135 10:38, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bootlegs

message: Could it not be construed as Point of View, opinion, etc. in that it is stated that: "Oddly, Beth Gibbons' vocal performance sounds nothing like her previous Portishead contributions."  Anyone in favour of editing this so that it states a more NPOV? --Frenkmelk talk 15:55, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV? 

message: There is no 4th member in Portishead: http://www.myspace.com/PORTISHEADALBUM3
Dave McDonald was a session artist brought in to perform for the Roseland show, but he has not performed with the band since.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.132.26.87 (talk) 11:20, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This is incorrect. He is an engineer and at least according to the credits of their second album engineered that. I'll do some research and add him. If he was just a session  musician why not list him with all the other musicians that helped the Roseland show? At least at a time he was considered a member of Portishead and thus deserves at least a single mention on this page!! Just because he is not listed on a myspace page (which may not be run or endorsed by the band but I don't know) is no real proof at all. I will add something once I do a bit more research. --AresAndEnyo (talk) 06:27, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  No 4th member 

message: You wrote for the description of the Portishead album:
"The album's sound differed from Dummy, the main differences being that much of the music was composed and recorded by the band, then pressed to vinyl. This created a grainy, harsher sound."
I'm no expert on Portishead, but I do write my own music.  The sound of 'graininess' produced by a record being played back on vinyl is often these days simulated with a plug-in in the DAW (Cubase 4, the software I use, has a plug-in called 'grungeliser' that adds vinyl pops and crackles, plus other lo-fi effects associated with playing a record.)  While this may not be a 100% perfect simulation, it's an effect used often because it is inexpensive and controllable.
My point is this: could you double-check that the music was actually pressed to vinyl, and not simply 'grungelised?'  I know independent artists do often press their own records, but that tends to be for distribution purposes.  If they want to achieve a vinyl effect, plug-ins are normally the way to go.  Did you simply assume it was pressed to vinyl, or do you actually have a source of reference to back this up?
It's quite possible I am wrong, and that they really did press the record to vinyl.  It's just that it would be a very unusual method given the abundance and ease of using plug-ins.
Just a thought,
Daniel —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dpolwarth (talk • contribs) 21 April 2008 
your plugin did not exist in '96. the music was pressed to vinyl, per interviews w/ the band.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.171.187.135 (talk) 13:18, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If I remember correctly, they recorded the *samples* and had them pressed to vinyl, then the DJ sampled that vinyl back into the main mix. That was done mainly so they could sample whatever they wanted (ie: specific notes, passages, etc) and not have to a)pay rights or b) force things to fit in their songs. The wording of the article makes it sound like they recorded EVERYING and thats why the album sounds the way it does... So, basically something's really wrong here, but I don't have the data (or a citation) to fix it. For now, I'm going to pull the sentence, its obviously untrue.JamesBenjamin (talk) 21:21, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was music actually pressed to vinyl, or did it simply use a 'grungeliser?' 

message: Hello,
i would like to suggest an external link to portishead's last.fm page (http://www.last.fm/music/Portishead). 
Last.fm is, like wikipedia, a user generated music platform offering free contents such as charts, music streaming, videos, gigs listings, image galleries, etc. Regarding Portishead in particular their new album is yet available as an exclusive preview in free streaming on demand on last.fm (http://www.last.fm/music/Portishead/Third).
As a member of last.fm staff i would like to point your attention to what we believe to be relevant and free contents for those wikipedia users interested in the band.
cheers,
Marco - Last.fm Staff (Mystical-bunny (talk) 17:00, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. -- Quiddity (talk) 03:13, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  External link to Portisehead page on last.fm 

message: I think this group needs a . Even the Bay City Rollers have a navigation box! StevePrutz (talk) 01:40, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Be bold, but keep it simple at the start; follow an example from a Featured article if you can. -- Quiddity (talk) 03:13, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Navbox 

message: I removed pearl from the discography, as it is not a real Portishead album . --Apostmodernrobot (talk) 03:45, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: So what is it? Isn't that worth mentioning if it's a cause of common misunderstanding? Malick78 (talk) 23:34, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Not as an official release of theirs, since it's not. If we had sources talking about it as an exceptionally clever bootleg we can mention it in that context. rootology (T) 13:36, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pearl 

message: Isn't he worth mentioning? He is/was their tour DJ. Malick78 (talk) 23:33, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[DJ Andy Smith]]

message: Portishead shouldnt link here, It should link to Portishead, Somerset if it is named after that town.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.128.250.236 (talk) 15:01, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Portishead, Somerset 

message: I've sent amazon.com a request to include GFDL attribution for copied content that is at http://www.amazon.com/Third-Portishead/dp/B0016HNOXQ. — xaosflux Talk 01:43, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amazon.com is copyvio'ing this page 

message: The only online source for the rumor that Barrow and Utley are the artists behind The Temple Cloud Country Club is this wikipedia article...guess it's just a viral campaign of their label. Or just a troll entry.  -- SomeVapourTrails (talk) 15:11, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The rumor is actually a troll entry. It's not true.85.178.101.80 (talk) 10:12, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Rumor Temple Cloud Country Club

message: Sure this isn't stressed on the -por-, i. e. the first syllable? I'd never pronounce the band name on the last syllable, let alone that I'd ever heard it that way by others. -andy 92.230.14.232 (talk) 00:29, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I'm sure. This is something of a shibboleth, actually. People from the area always put the stress on the final syllable. while for some reason everyone else puts the stress on the first syllable. No one is going to say that the other one is wrong, but it is more correct to stress the final syllable. (I'm from Bristol) --ascorbic (talk) 12:44, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Good for you ... but yet I beg to differ. This is about the band; and NOT the town. That's the reason why the pronunciation should be given based on how it's pronounced by media people (producers, TV presenters, DJs, VJs etc.) And that does not apply for the pronunciation on the first syllable, which, no doubt about it, may be perfectly right for the town according to which the band have chosen their name from. Heh, maybe I should give another example. Ever heard of Mr. J. P. Joule? His name rhymes with "foul", but the physical unit--you won't believe it--is called "Joule", but its pronunciation rhymes on "cool" instead. -andy 92.229.185.19 (talk) 22:38, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  That analogy would only make sense if the unit was named after him *and* he pronounced the name of the unit the same as his surname. How about we go with how the members of the band pronounce it themselves: Geoff Barrow stressing the final syllable --ascorbic (talk) 15:59, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  yur, it be port'zhed, me babby, innit? (another Bristolian} Jezhotwells (talk) 19:11, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 

message: The article makes no mention of the song "Leave me Alone" which was a collaboration between Portishead and Natalie Imgruglia, for her debut album "Left of the Middle." Portishead is also not mentioned on Natalie's page either. I propose a simple line under the "Dummy" section about the song. No new section. 
Source: http://caweb.madisoncollege.edu/Instructors/Samples/web_1/MMHanson4/portisweb/Discography.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.211.196.141 (talk) 03:13, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  No mention of the collaboration with Natalie Imbruglia 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Portishead (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100402070726/http://www.portishead.co.uk/blog.php to http://www.portishead.co.uk/blog.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:56, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Portishead (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130204075727/http://www.brits.co.uk/artist/portishead to http://www.brits.co.uk/artist/portishead
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071213011312/http://www.coachella.com/updates/news to http://www.coachella.com/updates/news
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080613124557/http://www.thequietus.com/2008/06/portishead-on-public-enemy/ to http://www.thequietus.com/2008/06/portishead-on-public-enemy/
*Corrected formatting/usage for https://www.amnesty.org.uk/news_details.asp?NewsID=19798
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:11, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified