lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Numbered Treaties

message: APRenaud (talk) 12:31, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

message: I just finished read your article and I have to say you guys are off to a great start. You article is very informative and has a very nicely developed flow to it. It has a lot of the already important information however, there can always be more, this topic is quite diverse so don't be afraid to explore it. I also edited some very minor spelling errors in the background section of the article. I also added some missed links. There really is not much more to be said about the page.
This article is one of the best i've seen so far, keep up the good work guys. 
Evo mather (talk) 15:40, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Peer Edits 

message: We are in the final stretch of our assignment, which means we will be posting large sections we have been working on into the article. 
By the end of this morning we will hopefully have our new implementation section posted along with government and first nation perspective uploaded.
To follow will be supporting paragraphs that will touch upon language and other subjects
Feedback is always welcomed APRenaud (talk) 13:04, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Update to Page 
Talk:San Rafael, Bulacan

message: El texto correspondiente a la época estadounidense es tendencioso. La escuela de San Rafael, como la mayoría de las escuelas primarias en Filipinas, es de época española (véase el discurso del presidente de la Mancomunidad de Filipinas ante el Senado de los EE.UU. en que recuerda que las instalaciones eran de época española, reutilizadas después por los estadounidenses)
¿Por qué razón el Gobierno de los EE.UU, tras la Guerra Filipino-estadounidense, prohibió el idioma español, que era el usado en San Rafael, además del tagalo? 
El Gobierno español seguro que hizo cosas mal, pero no puede decirse que se privó de enseñanza durante 300 años, es absolutamente falso.
Lo que se comprueba es que la maquinaria de propaganda de EE.UU. ha funcionado muy bien, haciendo que algunos filipinos no acepten su historia, que aunque no queramos, es compartida con los españoles por más de 300 años.  
   The text for the American era is biased. The San Rafael school, like most elementary schools in the Philippines, is from the Spanish period (see the speech of the president of the Commonwealth of the Philippines before the US Senate in which he recalls that the facilities were from the Spanish period , later reused by the Americans)
For what reason did the US Government, after the Philippine-American War, ban the Spanish language, which was the one used in San Rafael, in addition to Tagalog?
The Spanish Government sure did things wrong, but it cannot be said that it was deprived of education for 300 years, it is absolutely false.
What is proven is that the US propaganda machine has worked very well, causing some Filipinos not to accept their history, which even if we don't want to, is shared with the Spanish for more than 300 yea  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ayeri2003 (talk • contribs) 15:07, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biased/Tendencioso
Talk:HMS Velox (D34)

message: There was apparently an earlier Velox, lost in 1915. Were there any more ships of this name? Drutt (talk) 08:02, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Definitely agree, I find reference to it in 1911 work at s:Page:The Steam Turbine.djvu/57 — billinghurst sDrewth 21:22, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

message: There is a photograph of HMS Velox (and HMS Watchman) visiting Preston in 1919 on the Lancashire Image Archive.  Don't know if it is worth adding a link?  --jmb (talk) 12:23, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Photograph
Talk:Bill Stevenson (offensive lineman)

message: Why on earth is a Canadian footballer called an American Footballer?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.116.59.222 (talk) 01:27, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: American football??

message: Bill was born on Sept 20. Not June 4. 104.192.153.232 (talk) 14:53, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthdate is incorrect
Talk:Edward Colston (U.S. Representative)

message: I've been doing some cleanup on this article and don't have any idea why someone using only an IP address changed the infobox to say this man represented Botetourt County, hundreds of miles south from his native Berkeley County, and while a Berkeley County history says he was representing Berkeley county. I didn't remove it because I don't have access to Leonard's book right now to figure out who actually represented Botetourt County in that year.Jweaver28 (talk) 18:48, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  botetourt county
Talk:William Tredway (American politician)

message: According to Wikipedia:Start-Class, the classification requires that, "The article has a usable amount of good content but is weak in many areas. 
"...the article should satisfy fundamental content policies such as wp:notability and BLP, [it does, featuring a notable person who is both an elected member of the State legislature and a delegate to a Constitutional Convention -- see wp:politician.] ..."and provide sources to establish verifiability. [It does here, whether from Pulliam, the Biographical Directory of Congress, or Brenaman.]
"No Start-Class article should be in any danger of being speedily deleted.” TheVirginiaHistorian (talk) 12:06, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Start class article
Talk:Megaloceros

message: The various species of the Cretan genus Candiacervus - the largest of which, C. rhopalophorus was just 65 centimeters high at the shoulder... in this article.
But in Candiacervus ... C. rhopalophorus is the smallest, being only 40 cm high at the shoulder !
? Chaoborus 00:36, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Candiacervus 
Talk:Joel Holleman

message: Biographical Directory of the United States Congress contradicts two other sources, Poore and Jamerson (both cited in the article) on a couple of different points. The Directory has Holleman attending Wake Forest University where Jamerson says University of North Carolina and Poore specifies "Chapel Hill". As Wake Forest wasn't founded until 1834, by which time Holleman was already an elected officeholder, I assume UNC is correct.
There is also ambiguity over the length of Holleman's Congressional term. The Directory says he took office March 4, 1839, the first day of the 26th Congress. Jamerson says he was elected in 1839, and Poore says he took office on December 2, 1839, implying he served only one year of the term. However, Poore's article on Holloman (p.451) says he defeated the Whig incumbent, Francis Mallory, but the article on Mallory (p.521) says he was unopposed for re-election to the 26th and 27th Congresses (1838, 1840). I think it best to stick to the Directory dates here. Rklear (talk) 08:56, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradictory sources
Talk:Iguanidae

message: The article as written had a comment that Frost and Etheridge's decision to elevate iguanid groups to full families is not generally accepted. This may have once been true, but most recent articles in the literature do indeed recognise the various clades of Iguanidae sensu lato as separate families.Kaficek (talk) 13:44, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Families or subfamilies
Talk:Strophic form

message: I removed the paragraph at the bottom of the page seeing as some of the information either had appeared inside the article already.  Also, the comment about the comparisons between Theme and Variations and strophic are valid, but there are some large differences, and could lead someone to incorrect conclusions about how stropic form works.  Although related, they are exclusive forms.  If one wanted to list forms similar to strophic and included several forms, that would work, but a paragraph on the similarities that is as long as the explainiation could be misleading. SteppAN 16:00, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed Paragraph

message: Why, what, where, and how does this article need additional citations for verification? Hyacinth (talk) 02:26, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: All articles need reliable, third-party sources. This article doesn't have any, which is why it's tagged. Some inline citations would help too.  • DP •  {huh?} 15:05, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional citations
Talk:Gendarmerie (Austria)

message: Suggest this pages title be changed to Gendarmerie (Austria).  There are a lot of problems with this page, mostly how it scans in english as it seems to have been translated directly from the german language version by automatic translation software.  The name is simply that as it would be in german, however this is not how anyone searching for it for find it.  If I wanted to find information about the Austrian Gendarmerie, I should not have to use the german language version for "federalgendamerie" Thecrystalcicero (talk) 23:06, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I am strongly against naming pages with names other than the correct ones, like 'French X' and 'Austrian X' because it confuses people as to what their actual name is. guidelines say you should differentiate between subjects of the same name by using brackets after the name. actually, searching 'Federal Gendarmerie' brings this as the second result. I put in a redirect from Austrian Gendarmerie anyway. I also re-wrote what I could of the article. ninety:one 09:05, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
Category talk:Countries in the Caribbean

message: This page is a great start but you need to exclude the Bahamas and the Turks & Caicos.  They are NOT in the Caribbean.  Close but close doesn't count.
I second the above statement.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.130.80.245 (talk) 03:21, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Country or territory?
Talk:Labour Day Classic

message: What is that supposed to mean? Modal Jig (talk) 15:21, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: A British term not in wide use in Canada.  I've reworded it. Resolute 16:27, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! Modal Jig (talk) 17:50, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "is known for its fixtures" 

message: Anyone know how to repair the Edmonton/Calgary series? It should be Eskimos/Elks vs Stampeders. GoodDay (talk) 01:21, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I noticed that inconsistency myself earlier today. I'll replace "Edmonton" with "Eskimos" or "Elks" as appropriate after tomorrow's game. Indefatigable (talk) 02:54, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I started a discussion Template talk:Sports rivalry series table#Eskimos/Elks. I see now that there are complicated templates in play. Indefatigable (talk) 23:50, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edmonton vs Calgary
Category talk:Australian Open (tennis) champions

message: This really needs to be broken down between singles and doubles winners. The often obscure players who win doubles nowadays do not deserve to be in a merit-based category for the superstars. Abberley2 11:46, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The list is broken out by "type"; this is just for the template on the players themselves... -- Mjquin_id (talk) 22:44, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: 2007
Talk:TSN Top 50 CFL Players

message: I'm not in favour of adding TSN's 2010 list of best CFL players, as it is clearly not focused on long-time achievements.  It appears to be their assessment of the best of those who were playing that year.  Opinions?  PKT(alk) 21:03, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello??  is this thing on??  PKT(alk) 21:20, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition of 2010 & subsequent lists 
Talk:Ukrainian Marine Corps

message: Named it Marine Corps instead of Naval Infantry because thats how Ministry of Defense lists it in the English section of their website. http://www.mil.gov.ua/index.php?lang=en&part=structure&sub=navy Ceriy 01:08, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Can this be called a Corps? Морська піхота України складає один батальйон у складі окремої бригади берегової оборони Військово-морських Сил України This is one battalion which is a part of coastal defense brigade Naval Forces of Ukraine UeArtemis (talk) 13:30, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, since it is a separate branch of navy, that what corps means in this case, not a size of a unit. "Marine Corps, being highly mobile armed branch, is used as a component part of amphibious, airborne and amphibious-airborne operations, alone or in accordance with formations and units of the Army in order to capture parts of the seashore, islands, ports, fleet bases, coast airfields and other coast objects of the enemy. It can also be used to defend naval bases, vital areas of the shore, separate islands and coast objects, security of hostile areas." Ceriy (talk) 17:08, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: Im wondering as to whether something related to the engagement mentioned above should be added? From what I know it would seem the Ukrainian Marine Corps are playing an important role in that theatre. Jamham420 (talk) 03:24, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dnieper Campaign
Talk:Buckingham Charter Magnet High School

message: I'm fairly new to wiki editing, but can someone make a redirect so that when you search "BCMHS," you will be redirected to this page. It's a bit annoying having to type the entire school name to find the page.--Wiimo 01:15, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Anyone?--Piratesmack (talk) 05:20, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.— Dædαlus→quick link / Improve 07:32, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks--Piratesmack (talk) 06:28, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect
Talk:Downtown Norfolk, Virginia

message: The article is comprised entirely of unsourced, original research and is clearly biased: the "Success" of Downtown Norfolk Waterfront Redevelopment, "Benefits" of "successful" downtown revitalization spin off throughout the city.  It would be appropriate under Wikipedia guidelines to remove the article completely and start over with sources information. 842U (talk) 11:43, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original research and unreferenced information 

message: Was it in the mid-19th century or mid-20th that containerized cargo impacted the waterfront?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by SmallChange (talk • contribs) 23:52, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect century? 
Talk:Delaplane, Virginia

message: but, I'll fix them later this evening.  --Kenatipo  speak! 18:30, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Done! --Kenatipo  speak! 04:09, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geo-coordinates wrong 

message: The red roofed church is Trinity United Methodist in Paris, Virginia, about 7 miles north of Delaplane.  --Kenatipo  speak! 05:19, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  photo is Paris, not Delaplane
Talk:Jardin Au Fou

message: correct would be:
Drums on A3 by Greene, Cello on B2/B3 by Ulrike Lau, Guitar on B2 by Hans Brandeis, Flute on B2 by Wolfgang Dünnschede87.162.94.214 (talk) 17:28, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Schlagzerig? Schlagzerig Greene on keyboards?
Talk:Mort Aux Vaches

message: IMHO there should be a separate entry for the sex expression “Mort aux Vaches” by itself, as it has its own context separate from these albums. Felicity4711 01:40, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Just the Expression
Talk:Celebration City

message: See this.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.130.156.215 (talk) 00:27, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: False Demolition

message: I used to work for this park, so I am happy to provide what info I can to help. If someone wants to point my knowledge to good use, point me in the right direction. Ryanthewebguy (talk) 07:26, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Stamp duty in the United Kingdom

message: My edit was reverted. I removed a statement which had as its only source the Daily Mail. So I must ask now: is the Daily Mail considered to be a reliable source on Wikipedia? I ask seriously. KarlFrei (talk) 20:14, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind, I've found the answer: it is not! What a relief :-) Wikipedia:Potentially unreliable sources KarlFrei (talk) 20:19, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Daily Mail article 

message: The title of this WIKI is Stamp Duty in the United Kingdom. There is no real emphasis there are three stamp duty systems in the United Kingdom one for each England, Wales & Scotland.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.31.40.26 (talk) 16:37, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a United Kingdom Tax 

message: This article provides the current rates for stamp duty on residential property.   This suggests that stamp duty might have different rates on other types of property eg agricultural and commercial.   If so, it would be good to add these.   If not, the word 'residential' should be removed. FreeFlow99 (talk) 12:54, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-residential stamp duty
Talk:Willow Springs Water Park

message: "...is ending the $5-per-person discount it had been offering on its entrance fee to church groups after the head of a secular charity that caters to inner-city youths requested the same deal for its kids... , a second ROCAN administrator, phoned David Ratliff, Willow Spring Water Park's owner, to complain about what he felt was a discriminatory practice.  As a result, Ratliff decided to cancel the church-group discounts, rather than give ROCAN the same rebate on the park entrance fee. "
* Complaints prompt water park to end discounts for church groups foxnews.com. Nemissimo (talk) 18:54, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Water park refuses to give secular charity same discount as religious group when asked, instead removes discounts altogether
Talk:Gotong royong

message: sorry - this is more a start class - and it is indeed a "good start". B class is something is of substantial quality and maturity. not quite there yet. I think it needs to go either a more throrough collab effort with other editors or more expansion (preferably both). We need to be consistent too across the Indonesia project with our rankings and this would be a "Start" class. --Merbabu 08:48, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Quality: not yet B
Talk:Lincolnshire Posy

message: Information to be added or removed: I would appreciate it if someone could add both a segment of movement five and a corresponding MIDI file.
Explanation of issue: My computer is garbage, and as such, cannot handle MIDI files.
References supporting change:  Here's the IMSLP page.
Thank you, Aven13 15:59, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm a bit busy at the moment, but I'd be glad to do so when I get the chance. Thanks for the suggestion! Noahfgodard (talk) 18:20, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  this has sat here for about a month now and so I am marking it declined. I lack the ability to know what you want. Perhaps  can still help? Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 18:02, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

text:   Sorry for the delay. I put in an excerpt of the free time at the beginning of the movement. Noahfgodard (talk) 23:37, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit Request
Talk:Theoretical philosophy

message: This: "However, it should be noted that the division between practical and theoretical philosophy is generally only embraced in countries with a tradition of continental philosophy, and is hardly known in anglo-american academia" is not true, as far as I can tell. Sweden belongs firmly in the anglo-american analytic tradition and has basically no traditions of the continental variety of philosophy, but it is in Sweden that the distinction is the most pronounced. And where the continental traditions are the strongest (such as in France), there is no such division at all, that I know of. So I will remove this sentence unless someone has a good objection. Kronocide 15:33, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing a sentence 

message: They are part of the same dichotomic classification. Brad7777 (talk) 13:51, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Practical philosophy]]?
Talk:Regents of the University of Michigan

message: Looking at :Category:WikiProject Universities, it seems like University of Michigan might want to start its own project. I would start it myself, but I am already running WP:CHICAGO, WP:FOUR and WP:WAWARD.  Comment at Talk:University_of_Michigan#Should_University_of_Michigan_have_a_project.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR)  17:57, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should University of Michigan have a project 

message: I have been WP:BOLD and renamed Board of Regents of the University of Michigan to Regents of the University of Michigan, with the former now a redirect to the latter. The latter is the legal name of the body, per the Michigan Constitution, is how the body is referred to in both citations and copyrights, and is far more commonly used in practice (10x the number of Google hits and ~100x the number of Google Scholar hits). I think this was simply an error on the part of the article creator back in 2007 (fun fact: that was me!). Please comment here or on my talk page if you have any objections to this move. Sarcasmboy (talk) 22:54, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article rename/redirect
Talk:Palda

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 13:18, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition
Talk:Marketplace

message: Some time ago, the section "Around the World" only covered a few countries and had been tagged with "Needs expansion". I took this on board, and set about expanding the article, ensuring that at least some nations from each continent were represented. As there are some 195 countries in the world today, it is difficult to know how far to take it. But apparently, according to some recent edits, it has already gone too far. I see edit summaries with phrases like "it is huge" and "sigh" which suggest that someone is not happy with the current length. So, when people get together and figure out whether the article needs to be expanded or not, do please get in touch. Until then, I am over it. BronHiggs (talk) 01:04, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  To expand or not to expand? That is the question! 

message: Hi, I hear the term "Fresh Market" banded about quite a bit w/o a clear definition. I assume a fresh market sells pretty much "fresh" goods eg. vegetables and everything a wet market does, but differs in that goods can also be sold outside? I also assume a fresh market is a type of public market (although [it seems particularly] in the US, it looks as if [several] markets that are private also have been given the label similar to that of "fresh-market"). The term might also be a British bastardisation of alfresco markets, but I find that somewhat unlikely. I checked google scholar, and the term is used quite a bit in scientific papers, but I couldn't find any papers with a clear definition of "Fresh-Market" inside worth citing (not that I looked very hard). It would be good if the term "Fresh-Market" was documented somewhere, perhaps wikipedia or wikitionary. Note that when people talk of fresh markets they may also use the term in a business-like sense eg. "This is a fresh market for our adult entertainment business", which I believe is something completely different, ie. an adjective rather than a noun. The phrase seems undocumented though as it stands, in either form. 2A00:23C5:F089:FB00:7CD4:FAD:EA44:512A (talk) 23:20, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fresh-Market / Fresh Market
Talk:Philippine Association of the Record Industry

message: This article needs tons of work which I don't have at the moment. Here's one source for the certification levels  --Muhandes (talk) 10:15, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 