Talk:Internment of Japanese Americans/Archive 3

message: I found a reference that contains some books "on espionage and intelligence, based chiefly on research in the records of the National Archives."  I've listed those that seem relevant to this topic below.  Feel free to add additional books.  Please put additions below my list, so that we can keep a clear sense of who added which references.  
Aldrich, Richard J. Intelligence and the war against Japan: Britain, America and the politics of secret service. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000. xxiv, 500 p.
D 810 S7 A482 2000
Boyd, Carl. Hitler's Japanese confidant: General Oshima Hiroshi and MAGIC intelligence, 1941-1945. Lawrence, Kan.: University Press of Kansas, c1993. xviii,271 p.
D 810 C88 B69 1993
Clark, Ronald William. The man who broke Purple: the life of Colonel William F. Friedman, who deciphered the Japanese code in World War II. Boston: Little, Brown, c1977. ix, 271 p.
UB 290 C5
Drea, Edward J. MacArthur's ULTRA: codebreaking and the war against Japan, 1942-1945. Lawrence, Kan.: University Press of Kansas, c1992. xv, 296 p.
D 767 D66 1991
Lewin, Ronald. The American magic: codes, ciphers, and the defeat of Japan. New York: Farrar Straus Giroux, c1982. xv, 332 p., [16] p. of plates.
D 810 C88 L48 1982
Lowman, David D. Magic: the untold story of U.S. intelligence and the evacuation of Japanese residents from the West Coast during WW II. [Utah]: Athena Press, 2001. viii, 391 p.
D 810 S7 L68 2001
MacEachin, Douglas J. The final months of the war with Japan: Signals Intelligence, U.S. invasion planning, and the A-Bomb decision. [Langley, Va?]: Center for the Study of Intelligence, 1998. v, 525 p.
D 769.2 M33 1998
Matthews, Tony. Shadows dancing: Japanese espionage against the West, 1939-1945. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1994. 240 p., [4] p. of plates.
D 810 S7 M337 1994
Matthias, Willard C. America's strategic blunders: intelligence analysis and national security policy, 1936-1991. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, c2001. 367 p. JK 468 I6 M42 2001
Miller, Edward S. War Plan Orange: the U.S. strategy to defeat Japan, 1897-1945. Annapolis, Md.: Naval Institute Press, c1991. xxi, 509, [16] p. of plates.
VA 50 M53 1991
Prados, John. Combined fleet decoded: the secret history of American intelligence and the Japanese Navy in World War II. New York: Random House, c1995. xxvi, 832 p., [16] p. of plates.
D 810 C88 P73 1995
Smith, Michael. The emperor's codes: the breaking of Japan's secret ciphers. New York: Arcade Pub., 2001. 323 p.
D 810 C88 S656 2001
Stephan, John J. Hawaii under the rising sun: Japan's plans for conquest after Pearl Harbor. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, c1984. xii, 228 p.
D 767.92 S835 1984
United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Administrative Law and Governmental Relations. Japanese-American and Aleutian wartime relocation: hearings before the Subcommittee on Administrative Law and Governmental Relations of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, Ninety-eighth Congress, second session, on H.R. 3387, H.R. 4110, and H.R. 4322 ... June 20, 21, 27, and September 12, 1984. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 1985. iv, 989 p.
D 769.8 A6 U53 1985
--ishu 15:25, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  References to [[Magic (cryptography)]] 

message: From Wikipedia guidelines:
Signing your posts on talk pages and other Wikipedia discourse (but not on articles) is not only good etiquette; it also facilitates discussion by helping other users to identify the author of a particular comment, to navigate talk pages, and to address specific comments to the relevant user(s), among other things.  Discussion is an important part of collaborative editing as it helps other users to understand the progress and evolution of a work.  
Two issues make this highly relevant: (1) the high volume of contributions from anonymous editors, and (2) responses to other editors' posts that are intercut within the original rather than posted afterward.  In order for current and future editors and readers to make sense of the discussion, the least one can do is sign posts--with anonymous IP or user ID.  At least that way we can tell which is the question and which is the response.  
In my opinion, you're only shooting yourself in the foot by not making your posts clear with your signature and proper formatting.  In the end, it's your contribution, and your responsibility to make things clear for others.  Most readers will be people who come to this discussion later on and have to read the talk page top to bottom.  I'm keeping current, and I get lost. --ishu 00:57, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Sign your posts on talk pages|Sign your posts, please]] 

message: please visit http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/History_Student
I haven't compiled diffs.
Justforasecond 18:52, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: To clarify for interested parties, User: History Student has also posted to this page and made edits under User: 207.207.79.202. --Ogthor 22:35, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  rfc