Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates/archive2

message: When did the new section Wikipedia:Featured article candidates#New nomination, without feedback as yet get added to the types of articles, and what purpose does it serve.  Self nominations go to their own section, nonself nominations go in the without objections (yet) section. Am I missing something? Gentgeen 13:19, 8 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm confused too.  Now U.S. Electoral College is under current nominations, but not under a sub-heading, and there's comments against articles in the "without feedback as yet" section.  Someone feel like reorganising?  And how about a notice to tell people that newer nominations go at the bottom?  fabiform | talk 16:57, 13 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: What's with the new section?

message: *Ahem... I propose that Wikipedia:Brilliant pictures candidates be merged with this page.  It currently has only 7 images on it, two of which have sat ignored for over two months.  No one goes there, no one objects or comments, and no one moves them to Brilliant pictures after a suitable time... everyone here is good at all of those things however!  Sorry for using this page rather than the talk page, but my proposal went without comment on the village pump.  fabiform | talk 16:20, 3 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:Brilliant pictures candidates]] 

message: It has been proposed that Featured article candidates should be merged with Wikipedia:Featured pictures candidates, as the picture page gets very little attention from the community.  As a large, one time listing of articles to this page have been archived, we can now evaluate this idea under "normal operating conditions". Just for information, even after archiving the discussions, the page is 33 kb long.
Lets give this a week, so voting will end at 16:00 (UTC) on March 2, 2004.  Voting ends, final tally: 2 in favor, 9 against.
Here is the proposal under discussion:
:The nominations from Wikipedia:Featured pictures candidates should be added to Wikipedia:Featured article candidates to generate additional community activity regarding making additions to Wikipedia:Featured pictures.  Featured picture candidates will become a redirect to Featured article candidates.
*Support
*# →Raul654 17:38, Feb 24, 2004 (UTC)
*# fabiform | talk 18:28, 24 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Should this page combine with Featured Pictures Candidates? (poll)

message: Shouldn't the "Recently added to Featured articles" be placed at the bottom
of this page?  Afterall, the game is over for those items (and they have the most comment text associated with them making it harder to scroll past them to get to the candidates that are currently under consideration). Bevo 18:13, 24 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, it makes sense. Gentgeen 20:34, 24 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I moved the sections around. Bevo 22:20, 24 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recently added to Featured articles section 

message: There is so many nominations that I have trouble finding the text for a particular nomination when trying to edit.   If each nomination had a unique subheading, then with section-edit preference turned on, it would be so much easier to edit a nomination. - Bevo 19:06, 5 Mar 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this is a very good idea, lets make it like the new VfD. Sam Spade 21:04, 5 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sub-section headings for each nomination?