lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Haredi Judaism

message: :Main discussion: Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 350#Another unreliable Haaretz article
::I introduced the fundamentalism part to the article and I agree that 's version is more informative. tgeorgescu (talk)  14:21, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fundamentalism or not... 

message: The lie that the Charedi world experiences the same rate of child molestation as the secular world is a gross and blatant lie, completely unsupported by the links cited.
I have tried correcting this multiple times. It is being automatically reset and ignored.
The fact that I -- and effective no one in the Charedi world -- know how to use this website effectively doesn't make you people corrdect, it just makes you better at using the internet.
Your lies and antisemetism is highly concerning. Your lack of journalistic integrity is more concerning. The fact that white supremacists can use both of these issues to their benefit against Jews is even more concerning.  That last one is the reason I even encountered this site. 46.19.86.193 (talk) 06:35, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia does not lack Orthodox Jewish editors. In fact, they seem to de facto rule in articles which do not get much attention from the rest of the Wikipedia Community, and some of them seek to proselytize, but only in respect to non-Orthodox Jews. tgeorgescu (talk)  07:06, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Repeatedly trying to edit blatant lies 

message: The sentence "Boys and girls attend separate schools, and proceed to higher Torah study, in a yeshiva or seminary, respectively" implies that boys go to yeshiva and girls to seminary.  Is that correct? 142.163.195.205 (talk) 21:43, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Kinda. It describes some moderate American haredi culture. "Seminary" is the correct word for a women's gap-year program in Jewish Orthodoxy, as distinct from "yeshiva", which can be used for any level of men's education, and from "rabbinical seminary", which might be used for a degree-granting postgraduate vocational program for men. But such programs are more characteristic of Modern Orthodox / Dati Judaism and only attended by the more liberal American haredi communities. IMO it should be updated to reflect that the vast majority of Haredi women do not enroll in formal torah learning programs after high school. Also I'm a little bit confused by that paragraph; if it means to refer to high schools as "seminaries", that would not be correct GordonGlottal (talk) 20:06, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Schools?
Talk:Tatra

message: Tatra is also a mountain range on the borders of Poland and Slovakia; the car brand was no doubt named after it. I'll make a disambiguation page for it. jheijmans
There's another Tatra - Tatra Industries, which apparently went bankrupt in 1988.  It had previously acquired Cory-Wright & Salmon, a New Zealand engineering firm.  I'm trying to find out if it was related to the Tatra truck manufacturing company.
Slcaruba 05:35, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:DSA

message: Ellmist: where did you get all those expansions for the acronym DSA from? Do we really need all them? I thought disambiguation pages were supposed to disambiguate between pre-existing articles, not potential articles.. -- SJK
That makes perfect sense. I'll fix it right away. -- Ellmist
What about Distributed Systems Architecture? SyP (talk) 20:19, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's already been deleted twice. DAB pages shouldn't link to articles that will likely never exist. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 21:10, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Jimi Hendrix

message: Many of Jimi Hendrix clothes were designed and made by Michael Braun of Michael & Toni Designs out of Tampabay Florida. The crushed velvet pants that Jimi wore at Woodstock, Michael hand crushed the velvet. An interview with Michael Braun is in the Experience Hendrix magazine. A letter exists from Jimi to Michael & Toni asking for more clothes describing that clothes should be especially made as art.The velvet patchwork jacket hanging in the Rock n Roll Hall of Fame was also made by Michael as well as the flowered printed shirt shown in Life Magazine published in 1969. Shoshaana (talk) 16:17, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stage Clothing 

message: Renton, as a smaller municipality in King County, is often historically conflated with Seattle. Renton's Chamber of Commerce will gladly confirm that Hendrix was born and spent much of his youth there. Hendrix is also listed as a Notable Person on Renton, Washington. Stebenthom (talk) 05:41, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hendrix is actually from Renton, not Seattle
Talk:Radium

message: Further injuries and symptoms in the 1960s and 70s documented by Bill Richards, WSJ, 1983 "The Dial Painters"; Argonne laboratory reference, citation 43, is false. The Luminous Processes company continued to employ dial painters until its closure in 1978 who told employees they were safe as long as no radium powder was ingested. Cancer rates were twice as high including breast cancer which was proven to be related to exposure. 2605:59C8:20A4:D510:80A2:6965:8784:4980 (talk) 15:00, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Statement regarding no further injuries 

message: An area of commercial usage is not covered in the article.  Suggest the following addition to the "Commercial use" section:
Radium was used as an ionizing agent to control static electricity, for example in printing.  Commercial products included the Ionotron Static Eliminator, for teleprinters, which consisted of a bar to be positioned close to the paper or tape feed mechanism.
References:
Silson, John E. (1949). "Hazards in the Use of Radioactive Static Eliminators and Their Control".  American Journal of Public Health, 40: 943-952.  https://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/pdf/10.2105/AJPH.40.8.943
"Ionotron Static Eliminators - Description and Installation" in "Bell System Practices" (AT&T, 1959) https://www.navy-radio.com/manuals/tty/p-series/P31.154.pdf
Fireberd (talk) 20:52, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done for now: Given the response, I'll  close this as not done for now. -- Pinchme123 (talk) 23:58, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 23 August 2023 

message: Change
"Formerly, around the 1950s, it was used as a radioactive source for ..."
To
"From the 1910s, it was used as a radioactive source for ..."
Reference 
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radium_Girls Mhurrell1953 (talk) 03:26, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ayakanaa ( t · c ) 05:43, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 22 December 2023 

message: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2299-4
Should I add the +1 oxidation state to the infobox for this article? It seems reasonable, since the radium in RaF gave away one electron to a fluorine. SupercriticalXenon (talk) 14:41, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  A +1 oxidation state?
Talk:Goldwasser

message: I removed the final paragraph. This is an encyclopedia, a compendium of knowledge--not a forum to tediously harp on  the same ideas again and again. Try and keep to the subject at hand. Save the politicizing for another forum. Danny
:This stuff _is_ also made in Germany, and AFAIK the original company (Der Lachs) and recipe did indeed move to Germany after the war. Certainly I have a bottle of Der Lachs Original Danziger Goldwasser which was produced in Germany (think I got it in Prague, although could have been Munich.) This is the only brand I've seen outside Poland. In Poland I've seen other Danziger Goldwasser brands (presumably actually still produced in Gdansk) along with Der Lachs. Note I am neither German nor Polish and don't have any political views on the matter, I just think from what I can find on the web that Der Lachs was the original producer and they did indeed move completely to Germany after the war. There is a good bit on it in the German Wikipedia but I don't really understand German, perhaps someone else could help out. -- Blorg 15:40, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, the original "Der Lachs" Goldwasser is being produced in Germany. Me being German, I'll just translate the important paragraph from the German wikipedia here. "Danziger Goldwasser can still be purchased in today's Danzig, however it hasn't been produced there since the end of World War II. The original brand "Der Lachs" is now being produced and distributed by the Hardenberg-Wilthen AG in Nörten-Hardenberg (Germany). Goldwasser sold in Danzig is being applied a numbered customs badge of the "Ministerstwo Finansow RP Znak Akcyzy"". I could provide a picture of such a badge, however the ones on my bottles are ripped apart.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.16.81.82 (talk) 23:07, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old talk 

message: sooo... what does it taste like?  an awefully large article to not address the taste of the liquer`~~`  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.7.17.3 (talk) 13:37, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Second this -- some information beyond "herbs and roots" needs to be given.  //Blaxthos ( t / c ) 18:43, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  I thought i would taste like 'Goldstrike', but it taste like crap compared to that. This has some herbal taste that i do not prefer. --82.215.56.151 (talk) 19:40, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  TAste

message: I recently shot a photo of a rather different Goldwasser bottle. Might need some cleanup (please upload extracted image under a different name if you do anything beyond reducing the reflection); might be another useful image for the article. - Jmabel | Talk 16:58, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another photo 

message: In Exodus 32:20, it is written that the golden calf was burned, ground to powder, and scattered in water.  Then the children if Israel were made to drink it.  Could there be any connection?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Terry Thorgaard (talk • contribs) 17:11, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible Biblical Connection?
Talk:Printing

message: A paper by Vasant Shinde and Rick Wallis about (what is possibly) the oldest known proof of copper-plate printing from the Indus Valley Civilization.
I am not sure about the validity of the journal (Ancient Asia Journal), but the author, Vasant Shinde, is reputable, and the link to his paper is given here.
Should it be added, or should we wait for other papers on the topic?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.16.113.76 (talk) 05:25, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Probable historic printing in the Indus Valley Civilization 

message: I have repeatedly cited 
* 
because it is the only source I can find online. I only have access to a limited Google preview so I don't know if he cites his sources. The style is popular "easy reading" so may not be 100% reliable. The other source I found (at History of printing in East Asia) 
* 
doesn't confirm (or deny) it. Can anyone do any better? Specifically, 
* 
which appears to be the most authoritative source - does anyone have [access to] it? My particular item of concern is the 220 CE date for first use. 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 15:38, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I think other sources don't really know whether India or China printed on textiles first - parts of China are much better for preserving buried bits of cloth, so China may have the earliest surviving scraps. Needham is scholarly, but very very pro-Chinese, working in conjunction with his Chinese wife and other Chinese academics, and some Western scholars treat some of his claims with a certain suspicion. Johnbod (talk) 18:52, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  How reliable is Cunningham?
Talk:Pledge of Allegiance

message: What relevance does this have with the rest of the article? It seems to contrast with the rest of the section, it conflicting with the facts presented in the section. The reference cited just seems like an advertisement/op-ed for the author's book. Does ref 33 (and the paragraph it supports) have any relevance? Explodicator7331 (talk) 17:13, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It does seem relevant to me, but an interview is a very low quality source for this purpose, and I do not know that the author’s views are sufficiently notable to merit promotion in the article.  John M Baker (talk) 21:17, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

text: This doesn't have any relevance. It's one person's view, and it's not important to the topic at large. Also, it doesn't really sound like that's a major consensus on the topic. I'm going to remove it. Mrfoogles (talk) 09:22, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relevance of reference 33 

message: Reference 12  seems pretty sketchy and doesn't cite any sources itself. A more reliable source is needed. Montauk07 (talk) 00:54, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference 12 - not reliable 

message: Having respectfully paused my changes, checked my sources and explained how I have no desire to vandalize either the article, the diligent work of others, nor promote questionable sources, I will now be bold owning these edits. --Wclaytong (talk) 07:36, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The vandalism warning was added to the infobox to help slow down the true vandals, which was one of the main reasons I got involved in this article.  Since I'm not a historical expert on "Pledge of Allegiance", I can't argue if anything in the infobox is right or wrong, but per Wikipedia:Verifiability rule we all need to ensure changes can be verified by future editors, thus reference(s) may need to be added or changed.  • Sbmeirow • Talk • 08:24, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Perfecting the pledge versions. Citation 1 conflicts with itself.
Talk:The existence of physical objects

message: I think it's questionable whether this is properly an encyclopedia article.
Comments welcome.
True, since "physical" objects are generally defined as precisely those objects recognized by strict materialists, namely the ones we can detect.  That does not leave a lot for discussion.  Occam's Razor implies that the best theory is that they exist. Fairandbalanced 21:40, 9 Oct 2003 (UTC)
Talk:Pub rock (Australia)

message: Is Pub Rock (in Australia) really a genre? When one looks at the huge diversity of acts that came through the pub rock system it seems that "genre" (or "type / style") is misleading. For example are Hunters and Collectors the same genre as AC/DC. Likewise, compare Daddy Cool to The Screaming Jets. Many vastly different musical styles are represented on the list of notable pub rock acts. Having said this, I am not sure what the answer is. Maybe Pub Rock was some form of movement. In reality it was an outlet for many genres, styles and musical beginnings (and myths) and by calling it a genre, and placing it under the  "Music genres task force of the Music project" may be misleading. Maybe it was about the venues.....Prospect Hill Hotel, Largs Pier, Manly Vale Hotel etc etc.verba no acta (talk) 00:48, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Genre

message: After overhauling the main Pub Rock (UK) page, I changed the disambiguation page for "Pub Rock" to a redirect to send people to the main page. There is a link at the top of the main page for people who are looking for this one. If anyone searches for Australian Pub Rock specifically of course they will still come straight to this article but people looking for the more famous UK Pub Rock will not have to be forced to specify that they're not looking for info on the Australian scene. This reflects the comparative significance of the two and removes the unwarranted disambiguation page. If anybody disputes this please get in touch but I do feel certain that Australian Pub Rock is a minor category. Especially as the major artists covered in the article (AC/DC, Midnight Oil, INXS)are better served by other genre categories and as this article lacks any sources. Silverwood (talk) 10:05, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect

message: Why's the word 'liberalise' been spelt the American way? And fix 'Australia' above.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.38.162.188 (talk) 01:25, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Austalian and UK Pub Rock

message: The list of "Pub Rock (Australia)" bands seems to include just about every notable Australian band of the last half-century, with the exception of the Lime Spiders and the Bee Gees.  I am not quite sure what separates this supposed genre from pop music in general. Timothy Horrigan (talk) 23:57, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Except for the Lime Spiders and the Bee Gees... 

message: The usage and primary topic of  is under discussion, see talk:Pub rock (United Kingdom) -- 70.51.46.39 (talk) 07:15, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: "Pub Rock"
Talk:Bracket

message: I'm concerned by your addition of the html codes to the table Bracket#Unicode and HTML encodings for various bracket characters. What is  but a hex to decimal conversion? That html column is so mathematically trivial as to be way below the WP:NOTMANUAL threshold. 
The table as a whole seems yet another example of the kind of pointless article bloat discussed at talk:A#Proposed deletion of section in this and all the alphabet, so I am at a loss to understand why you would want to add to it given the clear consensus to spring-clean out such detritus? How is it Wikipedia's role to replicate the Unicode standards? 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 22:59, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with that and I think they don't need to be there. The only reason I kept adding them was because the other characters in the table already had them before I started editing. In my opinion, the only ones that should be included are the named entities from List of XML and HTML character entity references for consistency with the infoboxes that also include them. That's why I added them in this edit. Nickps (talk) 23:05, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: . Because it's incomplete. If there is consensus to remove it then it should go (and take the other overly long lists of characters that are in the infoboxes with it). But as long as it's there, it should at least have all the characters that belong in it. It's not like there was a pattern behind which characters were in the various lists and which were not. For example,  was listed, obviously, and so was . But while  was listed in the Parenthesis infobox,  was not mentioned at all. That makes no sense so I added it to the Unicode table. Nickps (talk) 23:23, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: In your place, I might have saved myself a lot of work and just deleted the whole thing straight off. Off with its head! --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 23:26, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:   Unicode and HTML encodings for various bracket characters
Talk:Privacy

message: My goal is to add or expand on the items enumerated in the Talk page’s “To-do list.” More specifically, I plan to:
(1) Insert a “Canada” paragraph to the “By country” subsection under “Legal right to privacy”; 
(2) Develop the “Privacy in non-human animals” section; 
(3) Insert a section on different philosophers’ views of privacy entitled “Philosophical Views on Privacy”; and
(4) Insert a section entitled “Personal Control” under “Conceptions of privacy”, from a psychological perspective.  
--Jane Doe 2024 (talk) 13:31, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: A few new additions

message: I have just moved the "Internet" section out of the "History" section, as it necessarily involves a more global viewpoint, but the History section is painfully US-centric and gives the impression that privacy itself is a US or Western concept, which is untrue but is often invoked by many entities as a form of propaganda to dissuade people from caring about privacy. To be clear, it would be extremely useful to expand the Internet section with more sources about non-US incidents, but I think it would be most helpful to expand the History section with descriptions of how classical conceptions of privacy have run into the more modern interpretations of privacy around the globe. Lcdrovers (talk) 21:44, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Globalize the History section 

message: Privacy is misused by corrupt independent sources to CENSOR public figures. Please include this fact in the article. 24.5.197.126 (talk) 19:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Please provide a reliable source for your claim. JohnLaurensAnthonyRamos333 (correct me if I'm wrong) 19:13, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Privacy is misused by corrupt independent sources to [[Censorship|CENSOR]] public figures. 

message: @Bold
,আমি জানিনা কতদিন বাসবো যতদিন বাসবো ততদিন তোমারে ভালো বাসবো 103.73.198.219 (talk) 22:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  bangla 

message: Please provide a reliable source for your claim. JohnLaurensAnthonyRamos333 (correct me if I'm wrong) 19:13, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  english
Talk:De jure

message: The examples about the Ottomans and Egypt is really confusing and dated. It doesn't really clarify the point it should be more relatable. Eg.
If the posted speed limit on a road is the De jure speed limit. But if everyone knows the cops don't patrol that street the De Facto speed limit is how fast our car can go.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.181.106.116 (talk) 13:38, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Really confusing examples 

message: Decided to add tone maintenance flag as the lead paragraph feels very anecdotal/unencyclopaedic to me, someone more knowledgeable might be better versed to review this and then remove as appropriate The capcon (talk) 18:07, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tone of article 

message: How much of an overlap would there be between "nominally" and "de jure", or could one (I assume maybe the latter) be considered a more specific subset of the other? — al-Shimoni (talk) 01:35, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Nominally" and "de jure" overlap 

message: A discussion affecting this article is in progress at Talk:De facto#Italicization. Certes (talk) 22:50, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Italicization