lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Juan Ramón de la Fuente

message: The student strike was solved violently using the public force in 1999. Why is user "Viscarra" hiding this fact? Boninho 16:09, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Most probably he (Vizcarra) deleted such statements because there were no sources.  Feel free to put back that info but cite your sources because if you dont then someone else, or even Vizcarra, will be deleting your edits or putting a tag on them. --Abögarp 16:23, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

text: OK, a link to the BBC news has been added: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/633046.stm Boninho 19:33, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's fine. I still rephrased it. If you don't add that the strikers were indeed violent... against university authorities... against the police ... against students who didn't agree with the strike, against the installations... adding the simplistic statement that his solution was "violent" violates neutral point of view. His solution to the problem is highly regarded as effective. There is mention of violent confrontations of strikers with the police even in the BBC source you have added "university authorities had requested help from the federal police after striking students attacked university staff and non-striking students."  --Vizcarra 23:12, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  This may end as an endeless argument that, indeed, has taken place in the past. I suggest not to longer it here, even that I do not share your point of view that students were violent. There were violence but it was seldom started by provocators and radicals that were never the majority. The term "violent" may be left out from this page in spite of agreement. Boninho 01:11, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not my point of view, it's even reflected in the source you provided, and many other sources. --Vizcarra 07:36, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Personally, I'd say the students holding Ciudad Universitaria were among the most violent ones. I was a student at Prepa 6 at the time and the strikers there were reasonably open to dialogue. Then again, there was at least one big fight between them and students that opposed the strike that even made it into national TV. -- Rune Welsh | ταλκ 20:18, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Jossi

message: #::::::Yes, it is off-topic, and if you were reading with the intent to understand, rather than to find a point of attack, you would have no trouble realizing that.  You were the one who introduced the claim about sociologists deciding not to use the word "cult" or "sect" anymore (and may I say what an irony it is to see you blithely asserting that "sekte" does mean "cult", when that assertion prompted a deletion discussion!)  As it happens, there is a big difference between sociologists deciding that they will not use the term anymore, and the Munich Lexicon of Law writing that the term has lost its legal meaning.  But it is off-topic to the question of "is Jossifresco fit to be an admin?"  To suggest that it is relevant suggests that it explains his double standards, and the only way it could do that is if you try to argue the ludicrous proposition that being called a "cult" is a pejorative accusation but that being called a "hate group" is not. -- Antaeus Feldspar 17:09, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Projective cone

message: Some point I'd like to discuss here :
I don't agree with apex.  Not only is that completely new to me, apex seems to be more a specific point on top of a three dimensional object, something sharp.  Top is more conventional? Evilbu 16:17, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, my fault. I suppose that "top" is OK, although it seems just as strange. (Since the lines continue beyond it, R is never the "top" of the object!) Jorge Stolfi 23:45, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Apex vs Top

message: I'm very new to wikipedia, so my first paragraph can be improper yes.  However, then where should my remark about the singularities be? Evilbu 16:17, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That remark could be added after the current last paragraph. However, note that the article must make some sense to the reader who gets here directly. So, if that remark refers to some complicated application of the concept, that cannot be explained in a sentence or two, perhaps it you should put the remark in the page of that application, not here. Jorge Stolfi 23:58, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Singularities

message: Why did you remove the \pi_{r}
It is a notation we use at university.  Why is R better?  It is not that important however.  Evilbu 16:17, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: For one thing, one should use the simplest notation that is sufficient for the purpose at hand.  Moreover, that kind of notation (where the subscript indicates  the dimension) is inappropriate  because, to most readers, it means the element of index r in a collection called π.  In particular, it also implies that πr = πs whenever r = s. That obviously is not the intended meaning. Jorge Stolfi 23:58, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notation for spaces

message: When R is empty, I think the best thing is not to define a cone. Conventions might differ but that is what I saw. Evilbu 16:17, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: When R is empty

message: Your remark about where the name cone comes from is good, but shouldn't you add that you a working in three d? Evilbu 16:17, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That does not seem necessary, since the dimension of X has to be at least three for R and S to be disjoint, and higher dimensions do not hurt --- the cones will all be projectively equivalent. Jorge Stolfi 23:58, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Ordinary cone
Talk:Esoteric cosmology

message: I removed from the section on Hinduism the sentence "Rig Veda is not about historical people, but it tells the story of the evolution of the universe by personifying scientific phenomena." as being just a touch POV. Unfortunately, the whole section is dogmatic and seems to have been written by someone convinced the the Vedas are the utter truth (and is less interested in writing an objective encyclopedia article). This section needs a total rewrite.
T of Locri (talk) 20:07, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: "Scientific Phenomena"

message: If there's no objection, I'm going to clean up external links. I can think of some that shouldn't be here and I can think of others that would be more approrpiateGinar 16:18, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi! Donnot agree: external links section is a section authorized in wikipedia articles. In this article it contains strictly the direct/basic links to different esoteric currents conceptions (mainly graphics for study comparison) on the structure of the universe, according to each one of the esoteric cosmology presented (many of them are later developed at each one's related article): as it is now, it is a valuable source to the article and directly related to the theme of article and related sections. Thank you, Regards --GalaazV 16:42, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: P.S.: Also the external links number in the article have been stable for a long time. Also agree with you when you say "I can think of some that shouldn't be here"; one, at least, is very simple to identify as its conceptions are not common to earlier and ancient (root) esoteric cosmologies: I would see it more as a new age syncretism, mixed with sci-fi fiction, and who knows, some not clarified intentions (not to say destructive; not all mediunistic-level communications are said to be from entities looking to aid human evolution). Would it be understood its deletion? --GalaazV 18:35, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: cleaning up external links

message: Could the work of Rudolf Steiner be included as an area where esoteric cosmology is to be found? After all, the article on Steiner does talk about esoteric cosmology. Vorbee (talk) 17:03, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Rudolf Steiner

message: I propose to merge Esoteric cosmology into Religious cosmology. This is a small article with minimal sourcing and it would fit nicely as a subsection of the other. Can we reach a consensus? Rap Chart Mike (talk) 13:02, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973

message: I put this back in :Category:British laws, as it was passed by the UK parliament. Kurando | ^_^ 16:19, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

message: Thinking there should be a ref to the Local Government Boundary Commission for Scotland somewhere in the article. Laurel Bush 17:25, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Added. Owain (talk) 19:28, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Local Government Boundary Commission for Scotland 

message: I imagine the wording under The new local government areas is that used in the Act. Eg, county of Inverness, not Inverness-shire. Wondering whether and to what extent it would be possible to use redirects, such as county of Inverness, rather than piping, so that what appear to be quotes will be more faithful to the original. Laurel Bush 09:37, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirects instead of piping?
Talk:Merve Kavakcı

message: The Turkish language doesn't use the Arabic alphabet, which is why I removed the Arabic transliteration of her name - it's totally unnecessary. 78.183.231.87 (talk) 11:16, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's with the Arabic transliteration? 
Talk:Chevrolet Avalanche

message: This sentence should be changed since the Avalanche is not technically a pickup.
No, it is not. Sneakernets 09:01, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The Chevrolet Avalanche is Chevrolet's top-of-the-line pickup" 

message: The entire section is in the wrong spot, isn't it?  It should be with the GMT800 section, not the GMT900 section, because it says the later models didn't have the problem.  It also sounds like it was quoted from a GM excecutive when the problem first arose.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.157.23.39 (talk) 23:45, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done --MarioV (talk) 21:37, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cladding Problems? 

message: The [Edit] 'button's for the first three sections (firstgeneration, secondgeneration, and thirdgeneration) all are showing up in the wrong location under cladding problems. Anyway to fix this? --$user log (talk) 13:12, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit Location

message: I'm pretty sure that the option is for an 8.1 engine, not a 6.1.  Unless of course my Chevy Avalanche owners manual is lying to me...
I can clear this up dude your owner's manual is not lying to you the Chevrolet Avalanche did have an 8.1 liter engine only on the 2500 series ICarly98 (talk) 13:05, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: 6.1 liter engine???
Talk:Broadford, Skye

message: An anonymous user wiped the Broadford page, and re-wrote it to be about a placve in Ireland. I think this is the fariest solution. Note that the edit histroy of this page is over at Broadford, Limerick. Grinner 16:31, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: More accurate and shorter as Broadford, Skye. Will move if no objection. Ben MacDui 17:26, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed move
Category talk:Programming language families

message: See the forthcoming discussion at :Category talk:Programming language dialects.  --bmills 16:35, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Forthcoming within 10 years, I hope? ;-) C Fenijn (talk) 14:32, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:Category:Programming language families]] and [[:Category:Programming language dialects]]
Talk:1972–73 in English football

message: Keep but rename. It has to do with The Football League --Walter Görlitz 16:40, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Hilltop Heritage Middle School

message: This page is so negative. Why even mention drugs and violence. The students at Jason Lee come from the Hilltop & Stadium Districts not South Tacoma. There are tons of run on sentences and spelling errors. Are they having one of their students editing the page? Changes needed :history of the school, correct geography, positive aspects such as diversity, Hilltop Artists, awards, community involvement etc.AcomaGirl 22:26, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article has grammatical errors and missing information. I have worked on the grammar, but I can't correct the missing information without someone who knows more about the school. Magdela 16:43, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Courtney Peldon

message: I'm not going to change it, but exactly why is this actress's Jewish family so high in biographical value that it has to be in the first sentence?
Because she doesn't have what are considered Jewish features? I don't know, that might seem kind of plausible if you squint at it the right way. Stilgar135 07:08, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Relevant conversations can be found here:
User talk:Dismas#Courtney Peldon and User talk:G.-M. Cupertino#Courtney Peldon [version link].
: [Added version link above.  — Athaenara  ✉  00:20, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dispute over [[MOS:SYL]] and [[WP:OVERLINK]] 

message: Dispute regarding whether birth dates should be linked as well as the degree to which WP:OVERLINK should be applied.  Keep in mind, G. -M. Cupertino spilled the conversation into the following two sections on my talk page.
Dismas|(talk) 20:33, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reason

message: I have removed the links for dates per MOS:NUM.  In an effort to work with User:G.-M. Cupertino, I'm taking the discussion here as to why he keeps going against the new MOS guideline about date linking.  So, please explain why you feel that delinking of dates is vandalism.  
To anyone else reading this, please note, that I have already taken the issue up at WP:3O and User:G.-M. Cupertino is acting in violation of the third opinion that was given.  Dismas|(talk) 02:30, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date links
Talk:Stadio Giuseppe Meazza

message: Shouldn't this article be at San Siro? It's clearly the most common English name. Giuseppe Meazza might be official, but everyone who's anyone calls it San Siro. Erath 16:51, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have to agree.  I think a president was set with Nou Camp article.  The actual name of the Nou Camp is the "Estadi del Futbol Club Barcelona".  For me and with most wikipedia articles, its the commonly used name of an item which is used.  See Heroin aswell whose real name is Diamorphine yet "Heroin" is used.  Niall123 11:31, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

text: Different wikis have different ways of presenting things. We here at the English Wiki do not allow for duplicate articles of the same subject. You have already been advised to use Requested moves/Technical requests if you believe a page move for San Siro is indisputable. Jalen Folf (talk) 17:59, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Dick cheney

message: please help keep this article free of all that Daily Kos crap, a minor hunting accident does not a controversy make--205.188.116.73 16:56, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This isn't even Dick Cheney's article. --Optichan 17:00, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: POV?

message: Please do not start an article about Dick Cheney at this location.  This is a "redirect" from improper capitalization to the real article.  Redirects help people using our search function and following links with typos in them.  They should not be used to create new versions of existing articles.  If you want to contribute to an article about Dick Cheney, do so at that page.  Thanks for understanding.  Jkelly 17:45, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page is a redirect 

message: The section "Relationship to Halliburton as Vice President" starts with a cryptic, out-of-context sentence: "Cheney has a Gift Trust Agreement pursuant to which an Administrative Agent has the right to exercise those options and distribute the proceeds from the sale of the resulting stock to certain charitable organizations.[29][Not in citation given] ..."
What are "those options"?  What is the relationship of the Administrative Agent to Cheney?  What is the "resulting stock" and what causes it?  Please write an understandable introduction! -Pgan002 06:52, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relationship to Halliburton as Vice President
Talk:Cyclone Anatol

message: I think this is part of the 1999 Atlantic hurricane season since it was named. E-Series 17:01, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Is it tropical? It may have had hurricane strength, but it occurred on a rather high latitude and I would expect it to be in consistency with the rest of the 1999 Atlantic hurricane season if it was a tropical cyclone. It occurred outside the season described there and its name begins with an 'A' — not exactly indications that it belongs among the 1999 tropical cyclones. — Peter L <talk|contribs> 21:26, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  It was an extratropical cyclone(therefore not tropical) and named by German meteorologists. Tarmo Tanilsoo 18:07, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Tropical Cyclone?
Talk:Teachers (2006 TV series)

message: The natural assumption is that the show is based on the earlier British programme, but I'm not sure this is in fact true. It's worth checking for sure. Kelvingreen 13:26, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've had doubts about that statement too, and have removed it pending a citation. ×Meegs 13:47, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A few people have told me that they saw the original pilot that was pitched and it was a lot darker and more akin to the British series. Then again that might just be internet heresay, and had no real impact on the way the US version developed anyway. You can hardly compare the two, they're so different - so I agree with the removal. Metathesiophobia 11:53, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

text: No, wait a minute - isn't it mentioned during the credits that the show is based on the British version? I'm quite certain I remember seeing this. Metathesiophobia 14:59, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's correct.  "Based on a Tiger Aspect Productions, Channel 4 series, 'Teachers', created by Tim Loane."  —David Levy 15:51, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not based on the British Show
Talk:New business strain

message: Not useful to merge the two articles. New Business Strain is an observed phenomenon, and Zillmerisation is one way of dealing with it. There are other ways. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ThirteenthGreg (talk • contribs) 17:06, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Share opinions here.  I did a search, and it appears that the non all caps version is more common.--Rockfang (talk) 09:20, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move
Talk:The Starting Line

message: The band didn't announce a break up, just a temporary absence. So should the time of existence really be 1999-2008?
Rob hendershott (talk) 18:16, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Indefinite hiatus vs. breaking up

message: To the person who keeps listing Mike Golla as a backing vocalist: Look, first off, I see you are a fairly unexperieced user. Please take a look at WP:MOS, as you are making a lot of style mistakes, not just in this article. Also, stop spamming the article with your comments trying to prove me wrong. They don't belong there at all. I read the edit history, so posting your comments there suffices.
Anyway, Golla is not credited in any of the band's booklets as a backing vocalist, as he does not perform vocals on any of their releases. In their videos, just like on the records (as those are the same recordings), Kenny Vasoli performs the backing vocals. Golla may lipsync to several lines, which is commonly done in music videos, just for the sake of giving it a more genuine feel. HarryCane 17:06, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Golla backing vocalist?

message: Why does the make yourself at home EP, need to say rock? I mean, it is an acoustic CD, so rock can be replaced with either Acoustic or acoustic rock. While the music containts both pop punk and acoustic rock, there is nothing to suggest rock itself. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.38.71.76 (talk) 17:46, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: First of all, I'm glad that you decided to take part in a discussion, rather than continuing the ongoing edit war, so thank you for that. As for the genre, it's common usage to first list the general genre a band/album/EP falls under (in this instance rock), then to list explanatory styles (acoustic rock, pop punk, post-harcorde, ska punk, etc.) since rock is such a wide genre. Same with hip-hop or pop, which just as well can be further subcategorized, but should nonetheless be listed where applicable, to give a general idea to readers who might not be familiar with the listed styles and subgenres. --HarryCane 13:53, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rock music 
Talk:Morteza Motahhari

message: Clerical titles should be included, see Thomas Cardinal Wolsey. Gryffindor 17:17, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think so.  There seems to be no use of this outside cardinals and popes; for example see Rowan Williams and Anders Wejryd.  In particular, "Ayatollah" is not used in Ruhollah Khomeini, Ali Khamenei, or Mahmoud Taleghani. --Saforrest 03:23, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Travels with a Donkey in the Cévennes

message: See question at the Teahouse. TigraanClick here to contact me 16:17, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  possible problem with the dates
Talk:NOS

message: NOS does not refer directly to nitrous itself but a manufacturer of the systems. Using NOS to refer to nitrous as a whole is regarded as juvenile at best (like saying "I watch RCA" instead of "I watch TV"). How do you think this could be better reflected while still maintaining the manual of style? -Drdisque 17:19, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, fair enough.  Accuracy certainly trumps style.  I put it back (more or less) the way you had it; mostly I got rid of the bolding.  Does that work better?  -- RoySmith (talk) 17:47, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have re-added Nitrous Oxide to the list since right in the intro sentence in Nitrous Oxide it mentions that it is also known as NOS. 69.182.48.34 00:16, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Nitrous
Talk:Edinburgh Seven

message: Came across this article, thought I'd improve it, but the online references I find are all contradicting each other on even the basics the riot (who was it, why, where?) and legal action (over what, started by whom, who won which points?). Shall investigate books. In the meantime, for someone who fancies trying to reconcile different versions:
*About Sophia Jex-Blake, from a Women in Medicine page
*Comparison of Jex-Blake and Florence Nightingale, from Centre for the History of Nursing and Midwifery
*Passing mention on page from Library and Archives Canada
*Wikipedia article on Sophia Jex Blake
And apparently the latest edition of the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography will have details about them, according to a page about the dictionary.
--Telsa ((t)(c)) 17:24, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources and references