lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:French cruiser Gloire (1935)

message: It had an interesting and IIRC unique camo pattern for some time: . This might be worthwhile to add, and maybe even a public domain photo is available. Dysmorodrepanis 22:55, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Excellent! Thank you for adding the photo! Dysmorodrepanis (talk) 20:57, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:French cruiser La Galissonnière

message: On june 25, 2015 the French warship (light cruiser) La Galissonnière was spotted at the dock of scrapyard 'Van Heyghen' in the port of Ghent, Belgium.
This contradicts all mentions that she was scrapped in the 50's.  Where has she been hiding all these years?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mohasi3 (talk • contribs) 09:35, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  La Galissonnière in Ghent 

message: This article is pretty much a duplicate of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Galissonnière-class_cruiser and should be merged.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:4DD7:C1EC:0:49FC:9F28:25FF:85F2 (talk) 15:40, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  duplicate 
Talk:YouX

message: A campus wider referendum will take place in April 2007 to seek the dismissal of the Union board. This is an actual event that is scheduled to take place. Please do not delete it if all you are doing is disagreeing with the actions of the individuals who wish to see the referendum proposal carried. Be constructive and add to the article. Ozdaren 15:00, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have restored the section on the referendum. The referendum is arguably the most important event to take place in the AUU for many years. It is a tangible result of the Federal Gov's VSU policies and the financial impact on student organisations. To relegate the referendum to a poorly placed sentence in the article ignores the impact of the whole situation. Ozdaren 13:42, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The whole article is very bad no sentence can be poorly placed because they all are. No argument can be made in context because there is very limited context provided. It is too early to tell 'the impact of the whole situation' (see my talk page) ...maelgwntalk 13:54, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Referendum 

message: There doesn't seem to be a compelling reason for different articles for each AUU constituent organisation - especially with the lack of verifiable information available and the questions about the union's future. alexis+kate=? 11:43, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Support merge The questions about the union's future are irrelvant but the lack of third party references on the topic mean that it would make a better article if they were merged. Is this the right name for the article? :: maelgwn - talk 12:33, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

text: Oppose Merge - The Sport at the University of Adelaide article deals mainly with the Adelaide University Sports Association, a separately incorporated body with a lengthy association with the development of sport in South Australia. It is only affiliated to the Student Union for funding purposes. It doesn't have any administrative connection to the Union (The AUSA employs its own executive officer and has had its own committee since 1896). The other parts of the article deals with college sport not connected to the Adelaide University Union at all. Ozdaren 16:30, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:APEX system

message: Does anyone else find 'APEX system' (Additive system for Photographic
EXposure system) redundant?
I think much of the material on exposure value should go in the entry for
that topic.  Perhaps most of the discussion of the exposure equation should
be in a separate entry for that topic.
I removed the reference to "light value" because the term has had so many
different meanings that it essentially is meaningless; I added all credible
meanings of which I am aware to the entry for light value.
Any discussion of APEX is necessarily historical—although the concept
was technically interesting, APEX essentially was stillborn.  I'm still not
completely sure when the use of past (vs. present) tense is appropriate.
JeffConrad 08:03, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Redundant?

message: There appears to be a bit of a conflict in EXIF 2.2 among K, N, and the stated value of B for Bv = 0; no manufacturer that I know of currently uses K = 10.7. The standard doesn't explicitly state that N = 1/3.125, but the implication is strong. I've speculated that it may be due to rounding, but it may just be sloppy copy editing (it seems strange to state that B is in cd/m^2 yet give the example in footlamberts). The description of the APEX quantities in general is pretty cryptic; it also seems strange not to state or even give guidance on the constants K and N.
I've tried to simplify the EXIF section (do we really care whether the data are recorded as rational numbers or unsigned short ints?). I changed the formula to force TeX because the HTML rendering has the annoying habit of appending hyphens to some  . . .  sequences. I also moved the EXIF link to the References section for consistency with the other references.
The last paragraph in the EXIF section still needs work. JeffConrad 10:16, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Edits of 19 October 2006
Talk:Elder Conservatorium of Music

message: On 27 August 2018 an IP edit (from the University) deleted a section on the Elder Music Library, "located in the elegant Hartley Building", but without providing an edit summary. This edit was later reverted by another editor. However, I've just deleted it again because there is no mention of the Elder Music Library on the Conservatorium's website, and a search on the University's website indicates the the Elder Music Library no longer has a separate existence:
:"The Music Collection is currently being relocated to Level 1 South of the Barr Smith Library. It will open on Monday 23 July!" (i.e. 2018).
and, under "History" on that search page:
:"The Music Collection was previously held in the Elder Music Library in the Hartley Building on the North Terrace Campus. The Elder Music Library came into existence on January 1, 2002 and its physical collection comprises mainly music materials - reference works, books, journals, CDs, DVDs, collected editions, historical sets, performance and study scores."
:"Previously called the Performing Arts Library the library incorporated holdings from the earlier Elder Music Library, the Barr Smith Library Music Collection, the Fulton Library of the South Australian College of Advanced Education and the library of the Flinders Street School of Music."
Perhaps a mention of the collection could be added to the article, provided a better reference can be found. Cheers, Bahudhara (talk) 23:51, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Good job, I understand Aloneinthewild (talk) 11:44, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Elder Music Library

message: * Ruby Claudia Davy
* Bryceson Treharne
and so on Tradimus (talk) 09:40, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable People
Talk:YouX Students Representatives Council

message: This article has no references, and no indication of notability. An attempt was made to delete it via , but the tag was deleted by an anonymous editor.  Just as a heads-up, if references are not provided soon, it is going to be sent to AfD, for a formal deletion discussion.  To avoid this, please provide reliable third-party references which show that this organization is notable outside of its local area. It might also be a good idea to merge/copy the information about this group, and all the other student groups in , to Wikia, which welcomes non-encyclopedic content.  Please see The Australia Wikia. --Elonka 20:56, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sigh. I see that you've found a new deletion fetish. This student association - as with many others - has a long and notable history, and has produced a significant number of notable people. Rest assured that any attempts to delete it - or to pull this stunt on other such articles - will be as vigorously resisted as your past attempts at disruption. I'd also point out that, unlike the couple of successes last time around, you will have zero success this time - as you can see from the external links sections of several of the articles you hit, sources in major newspapers abound for student organisations like this. Whether you choose to waste your time and ours is your own choice, but you won't get a single article deleted. Rebecca 05:17, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I beg your pardon? This article has been tagged since 2006-12-12 as failing to cite proper references and you're getting snotty about it? All that has changed since then is the addition of further unsourced lists of names and the updating—unsourced again—of the "current situation". Seems to me that you'd be better providing proper references for an article which in its current state any admin could speedy with a clear conscience. If "sources in major newspapers abound for student organisations like this", why haven't you added some? HTH HAND —Phil | Talk 16:07, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, please. There are hundreds of thousands of unreferenced articles on Wikipedia, the vast majority of which the notability is not seriously in dispute. This is not an exception. It hasn't got referenced because no one has gotten around to it, not because people have tried and failed. As for the speedy deletion claim - as much as people like Elonka have tried, you are not allowed to speedy delete articles because they are unreferenced and you want to. Rebecca 11:37, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability concerns

message: Why was the SRC section removed? The SRC is the new representative body to replace the saua
http://www.union.adelaide.edu.au/student/representation/src.html  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.90.153.242 (talk) 01:58, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  SRC 

message: I've done a general tidy up of the article and have removed details of the new SRC (other than it exists - it isn't the SAUA). Ozdaren (talk) 10:19, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added references and removed new SRC details
Talk:Thaddeus Kosciusko Bridge

message: I'm fairly sure, as this bridge is just north of Albany, New York (in the eastern part of the state) that it is not maintained by the Niagara Falls Bridge Commission. The article for the NFBC, as well as it's website does not list the Thaddeus Kosciusko Bridge. As I'm not sure who exactly maintains it, I'm going to change the entry to state that the New York State Department of Transportation is the responsible party, as they would be responsible for the bidding out of the work to private contractors in any case. SSaint04 08:12, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I wonder if this article should be renamed "Thaddeus Kosciusko Bridge (Albany)" rather than "Kosciusko Bridge (Albany)". Its official name is "Thaddeus Kosciusko Bridge," and nobody calls it "Kosciusko Bridge." --Albany NY 02:14, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed renaming

message: Shouldn't the reason that the bridge is nicknamed after Dolly Parton (and "The Twins") be mentioned in the article? Allen (Morriswa) (talk) 00:48, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nickname 

message: I suspect that these might not be the Bridges known as "Dolly Parton" Bridges.
I found two YouTube videos of a drive over the "Dolly Parton" Bridges.  One of them (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=97_jFVoMglo, "Dolly Parton Bridge, North Mobile Alabama") has in its description that it is a journey on "Interstate 65 bridge north of Mobile, Alabama".
Another YouTube video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=usc7zofqfYE, "New Dollywood Near Dolly Parton Bridge?") refers to "the Dolly Parton bridge in Creola, Al"
Obviously this is nowhere near New York.
It is, of course possible, that the name is used to refer to both twin bridges.
I haven't found any "published" sources for the name.
Perhaps an editor with local knowledge would like to confirm this or otherwise and make any appropriate changes. 
Hedles (talk) 21:25, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Dolly Parton" Bridges? 

message: Restating what's clearly stated in the entry -
:>For the bridge spanning Newtown Creek between Brooklyn and Queens, see Kosciuszko Bridge.
:>The bridge is named (using an anglicized form) in honor of Tadeusz Kościuszko (1746–1817),
Their different name spellings distinguish between the upstate and downstate bridges. This Americanized spelling without the z is the usage on the official dot.ny.gov pages.-Yohananw (talk) 20:38, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: name spelling: Thaddeus Kosciusko vs Tadeusz Kościuszko
Talk:4th Connecticut Regiment

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on 4th Connecticut Regiment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120925103255/http://www.history.army.mil/reference/revbib/ct.htm to http://www.history.army.mil/reference/revbib/ct.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
 --Lineagegeek (talk) 16:19, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified
Talk:Daniel Sordo

message: On World Rally Championship 2006 results, both Dani Sordo and Daniel Sordo were Wikilinked, although the latter didn't exist. "Dani Sordo" gets 143,000 Google hits, "Daniel Sordo" gets 134,000 (tested 2006-07-19). On WRC.com, he's profiled as Dani, but his website is Danielsordo.com. So which name to choose as the "dominant" one, and which to be the redirect? Wikipedia precedent doesn't help - Dani Pedrosa redirects to Daniel Pedrosa, but Tony Blair (a featured article) goes with the abbreviated name. Couldn't find a definitive WP:style guideline, so decided to do the simplest thing ~ Dani is marginally more popular and already exists in Wikipedia, so Daniel redirects. -- DeLarge 08:39, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:4th North Carolina Regiment

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on 4th North Carolina Regiment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100608052746/http://www.history.army.mil/reference/revbib/nc.htm to http://www.history.army.mil/reference/revbib/nc.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
 --Lineagegeek (talk) 13:24, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified
Talk:4th Pennsylvania Regiment

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on 4th Pennsylvania Regiment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100608052649/http://www.history.army.mil/reference/revbib/pa.htm to http://www.history.army.mil/reference/revbib/pa.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
 --Lineagegeek (talk) 13:23, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified
Talk:Adelaide Club

message: I propose substitution of "private" for "exclusive" in the first line, and deletion of "elite". See comment at Category talk: Traditional gentlemen's clubs
45ossington 16:21, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have replaced "exclusive", as it is used here as a descriptor rather than the commonly seen vague peacock term. The Adelaide Club still practices black balling; they are most certainly "exclusive"--Yeti Hunter (talk) 13:06, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: "Exclusive"

message: Let's please keep the controversy section out. It's discouraged by WP policy and serves to turn this article into an anti-gentlemen's club rant. "Excluding women"? Gentlemen's Club should have been a clue. And anyone who actually read the article about Bensimon's rejection would be left in no doubt he was blackballed not because he's Jewish but because he's a social-climbing preener, who immediately proceeded to publicly trashtalk the club he tried to join, completely vindicating the existing members' reluctance.--122.125.32.165 (talk) 17:07, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversy section
Talk:4th South Carolina Regiment

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on 4th South Carolina Regiment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100608052728/http://www.history.army.mil/reference/revbib/sc.htm to http://www.history.army.mil/reference/revbib/sc.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
 --Lineagegeek (talk) 13:21, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified
Talk:4th Virginia Regiment

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on 4th Virginia Regiment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100608052753/http://www.history.army.mil/reference/revbib/va.htm to http://www.history.army.mil/reference/revbib/va.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
 --Lineagegeek (talk) 19:33, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified
Talk:5th Connecticut Regiment

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on 5th Connecticut Regiment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120925103255/http://www.history.army.mil/reference/revbib/ct.htm to http://www.history.army.mil/reference/revbib/ct.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
 --Lineagegeek (talk) 23:23, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 
Talk:Polar modulation

message: It is unclear whether a linear PA is vital to implement a polar modulator or not. The first part of the article says it's absolutely vital, whereas the second suggests that acutally a highly non-linear PA can be used. --Romanski 08:54, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Linearity issues 

message: In reference to the change adding PSK (Phase-shift Keying) to the "See Also" section I would have to clarify that polar modulation deals with the mechanism by which modulation information is impressed on the transmitter/amplifier, whereas PSK is the information itself.  i.e. PSK is the bullet, and polar modulation is the gun.  The reference is innocent and doesn't detract, so I won't delete it, but it's technically incorrect. Dtwitkowski (talk) 09:37, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Similarity to PSK
Talk:Ben Barres

message: July 2006 articles list him as 51. Jokestress 09:04, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth year 

message: I notice that there are number of external links on this page, e.g.
    * Ben Barres website
    * Ben Barres Speaks on Women and Science at Harvard, 3/17/08
Please consider adding this link to an in depth video of Ben Barres telling his life story. The video is freely available on the Web of Stories website (http://webofstories.com):
    * Ben Barres telling his life story at Web of Stories
Fitzrovia calling (talk) 17:04, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links 

message: I am adding edits to the page for a class project for my instructor, drsusan1968. All changes will be made in the guidelines to the best of my knowledge. Tebryso (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Class Project
Talk:5th Pennsylvania Regiment

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on 5th Pennsylvania Regiment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100608052649/http://www.history.army.mil/reference/revbib/pa.htm to http://www.history.army.mil/reference/revbib/pa.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
 --Lineagegeek (talk) 21:35, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified
Talk:5th South Carolina Regiment

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on 5th South Carolina Regiment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100608052728/http://www.history.army.mil/reference/revbib/sc.htm to http://www.history.army.mil/reference/revbib/sc.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
 --Lineagegeek (talk) 17:55, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified
Talk:Franz Lambert

message: The uncanny similarity between the FIFA hymn and the Soviet anthem is a proven fact and, as such, has a place in Wikipedia. If you are not interested in facts, you shouldn't be interested in Wikipedia in the first place. --66.82.9.85 09:22, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm sure you don't mind citing a reliable source for that claim then; also, the way it is currently written, the statement rather reeks of POV. --doco (☏) 10:55, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Any person listening to these two anthems, no matter how musically literate, would be a reliable source: they are so undeniably identical that there is no need to go further than to compare the melody and to analyze the primitive harmonic sequence underlying both anthems (I3, V6, VI3, III6, IV3, I6, II7, V). I am a classical musician (composer, pianist, violinist, organist, and singer) with 30+ years of experience. If this isn't enough for "citation," I don't know what is. The only necessary qualification, perhaps, would be that the FIFA hymn is identical to a part of the Soviet anthem, the latter being a rather lengthy contraption. 66.82.9.77 08:30, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Find a citable published source as per WP:V and then we'll see. --doco (☏) 10:21, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The verifiable, citable published source, in this case, would be the Soviet anthem score. Buy it, and see for yourself. --69.19.14.35 16:11, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:6th Connecticut Regiment

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on 6th Connecticut Regiment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120925103255/http://www.history.army.mil/reference/revbib/ct.htm to http://www.history.army.mil/reference/revbib/ct.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
 --Lineagegeek (talk) 11:32, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified