lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Dolores Umbridge (character)/Archive 1

message: Where does Umbridge's birthdate come from. I don't recall her age ever being specified and the MuggleNet birthday archieve doesn't include her.
:I don't remember reading anything like it either, although I note that she is styled to have the same birthyear as Voldemort. Wishful thinking, perhaps? The Lexicon has nothing on it either, so I'll remove it if it's ok with everyone. Sinistro 08:48, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Birthdate

message: At the bottom of the page it shows who preceded and suceeded her as Defence against the Dark Arts Teacher.  But it doesn't mention that she was also Head of Hogwarts (in which case she would be bother preceded and suceeded by Dumbledore).  Even though she was only Head for several months she should still be listed as a Head of Hogwarts.
I've noticed that you have added Dolores as a Hogwarts Head so I would like to give a big thankyou to whoever did it! :)
:I hate to be the one to tell you, but someone's removed it again. Why would anyone do that? She was Head of Hogwarts for a time, and it should be on her page. Can whoever did it please state their reasoning here, as is polite? Noneofyourbusiness 15:05, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Head of Hogwarts 

message: Any speculations as to who will play her in the movie? If it were up to me, I'd get Prunella Scales, if only because Umbridge's horrible smile puts me in mind of Miss Mapp's horrible smile. --Angr/ 22:32, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I see the role has gone to one Imelda Staunton instead. Oh well. --Angr (t·c) 01:08, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Film portrayer 

message: ::What has happened to this article?  It reads like a junior high school book report.  Exploding Boy 21:31, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dissatisfaction with the article 

message: This article claims that even though Umbridge is not a follower of Voldemort, she is just as evil as the Death Eaters?!? I would dispute that and its Un-NPoV. Any thoughts? 88.107.25.64
I certainly agree that saying that she is just as evil as the Death Eaters is a statement that has no cannon support. Whether she's more "evil" than Lockhart or not is a matter of opinion, so... Emily 21:12, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evil as death eaters? 

message: Is it possible that her dislike of what she calls half breeds, giants, werewolves, centaurs etc stems from the fact she may not be pure human herself although there is no evidence of this I think it could be possible that she has hag blood in her.  Hermionie does refer to here as a hag in the OotP book once or twice but as an insult.  This is just a theory of mine but like Voldemort seems ashamed of and tries to hide his muggle bloodline Umbridge might have equal feelings about her own ancestry. Penrithguy 13:43, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting theory, but there needs to be more evidence before it can be mentioned on the main page. Very interesting idea though, I wouldn't have thought of it.  Noneofyourbusiness 15:02, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dislike of Half breeds
Talk:India Fisher

message: I hope next master chef you are not the narrator. They have never had one before and your voice is annoying and irritating, and it gets under my skin. I don’t know about anybody anyone else but I’m hating the fact they even thought they needed a near raider we can see and hear everything the fact they thought they needed to add that is crazy. I hope next season they don’t ever have another near raider it’s so agitating !!!! 104.245.221.165 (talk) 16:07, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Near raider
Talk:Ervin Burrell

message: :Season one: "The Target"; "The Detail"; "The Buys"; "Old Cases"; "The Wire"; "One Arrest"; "Lessons"; "The Cost"; "The Hunt"; "Cleaning Up" and "Sentencing".
:Season two: "Collateral Damage"; " Hot Shots"; "Hard Cases"; "Bad Dreams" and "Port in a Storm".
:Season three: "Time After Time"; "All Due Respect"; " Dead Soldiers"; "Straight and True"; "Homecoming"; "Back Burners"; "Moral Midgetry"; "Slapstick"; "Reformation"; "Middle Ground" and "Mission Accomplished".
--Opark 77 14:55, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Appearances

message: I have opened a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Fictional characters#Redirecting articles on %5Bmostly%5D minor The Wire characters about either redirecting this article to List of The Wire characters or turning it into a stub. If anyone is following this article I hope you can weigh in there. 61.18.156.43 (talk) 03:43, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to redirect this article to [[List of The Wire characters]]
Talk:Indira Naidoo

message: --Peripherypro (talk) 01:46, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

message: Fitztodo has reverted my edits, in doing so, re-instating three facts:
*that Naidoo's book The Edible Balcony was "best-selling";
*that it sold "over 16,000 copies"; and
*that it entered "a fourth print".
These are not supported by the cited sources.  The Daily Life article states:
Indira Naidoo's The Edible Balcony was a surprise breakthrough for Lantern, selling more than 10,000 copies and entering a second print run.
I am reverting the changes.  Please provide reliable sources if you wish to re-instate them.  —sroc (talk) 00:50, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Edible Balcony 
Talk:Indira Varma

message: Some anonymous user deleted her picture, probably after someone used it as a replacement for one on the Woman article (where it was also removed) ... I don't want to get into an edit war with some anonymous prude by restoring it, but at least having a link to it here on the discussion page may keep it from evaporating as an "orphan" image. --Dennette 13:06, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Deleted image

message: She narrators the bbc radio 4 drama Tommies (radio drama) from 2014 – present Man74 (talk) 17:06, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tommies BBC radio 4 drama
Talk:John Gawsworth

message: John was my godfather. The last time I looked at his wiki page it was mostly sniggering at him being a drunk and giggling about Redonda. This new page, however, is excellent, and highlights his abilities as an editor, his passion for poetry, and the help he gave to many aspiring writers. He was a sot - alcoholism creeps up on people, and the post war years were heavy drinking years all round - but also a very capable individual. My parents told me he thought the Redonda thing was a good joke to scam free drinks out of the gullible, and he and my father often got soused for free. So thanks to the the editors for this update.
MaxLeggett (talk) 16:41, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tx to the editors 

message: A BBC documentary on John, from 1970 or earlier, is here:
https://videopress.com/v/9AKbElGE
I don't know the source or when it was broadcast. It features interviews with e.g. Lawrence Durrell.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.198.27.218 (talk) 06:04, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Television documentary
Talk:Ine Eriksen Søreide

message: Was she also elected 
and In September 2013 ? (:no:Stortingsvalget 2013 i Oslo#Høyre looks 'as if', but I am not 100 % sure)  --Neun-x (talk) 16:16, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parl. Election 2013
Talk:Inese Vaidere

message: Expand with references. Philaweb T 14:40, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  How to improve 
Talk:Inez García

message: This isn't self defense. She drove after the rape to find him and kill him. If she'd killed him during the rape, it would probably be self defense.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.112.128.15 (talk) 19:44, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I happen to agree with your point of view, but per WP:TALK#USE and WP:TALK#OJECTIVE, "Talk pages are for discussing the article, not for general conversation about the article's subject (much less other subjects). Keep discussions focused on how to improve the article. If you want to discuss the subject of an article, you can do so at Wikipedia:Reference desk instead," and "Talk pages are not a place for editors to argue their personal point of view about a controversial issue." 73.166.250.111 (talk) 19:23, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not self defense
Talk:Inez Tenenbaum

message: The bit about the "controversy" with Colbert's campaign must be cited correctly if it is to be included, as in its current state it's a WP:BLP violation. That means it properly formatted as a footnote, and properly attributed to the correct web address (as it's a web article).  Anything that is not said in the article cannot be said here, and the language must be neutral. Oneconscious, see :Template:Cite news to help you. I'm not going to add it in, as I don't think this is an important enough item to include in someone's biography. I'd prefer it stay out, but if others insist it be included, it must conform the the BLP policy.--Cúchullain t/c 00:43, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversy
Talk:Infanta Elena, Duchess of Lugo

message: Is it true that HRH is developmentally challenged as widely rumoured in Spain? 
Doña Elena is Infanta of Spain not Grandee of Spain as it was written.  Her children of course are Grandees of Spain.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.173.160.175 (talk) 01:59, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Never heard the term before. Some explanation should be provided.173.189.74.76 (talk) 05:24, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: An Infanta is a princess of the royal house. The title was also used in Portugal and in some of the Spanish predecessor kingdoms. Some people just choose to use "Princess" in English, which is not incorrect. 99.248.126.235 (talk) 22:39, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  So, what's an "Infanta"? 
Talk:Infanta Pilar, Duchess of Badajoz

message: Correction needed as Infanta Pilar is not an Grandee of Spain.  She is an Infanta of Spain, the title of Grandee of Spain belongs to the children of an Infante of Spain.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.60.207.39 (talk) 16:15, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I do not see why someone had to delete part with her titles?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.245.143.55 (talk) 22:33, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Her titles
Talk:Inge Borkh

message: We start out saying she "is a German soprano".  She made her debut in Lucerne and stayed in Switzerland till 1951.  
That is the last reference to Switzerland, but 1951 was a very long time ago.  So, on what basis is she categorised as Swiss, and only Swiss?  --  Jack of Oz [your turn] 19:15, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know. I didn't write the article, nor had so far even time to look at categories. Nor to add that she worked in Berlin and Munich at her prime time, and lived in Stuttgart for the longest time. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:33, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Swiss categories?

message: You duplicated some text in the paragraph beginning "Borkh portrayed challenging dramatic roles...". I separated into two paragraphs for better comparison. Please look at this. BTW: ref. 11 gives Welitsch's occupation as a "bartender" (Bariton?) :)) Jmar67 (talk) 23:57, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I know that my work after midnight is not my best work, sorry. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:33, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplicated text 

message: The BR obituary seems to say it is indeed 1921: "Übrigens musste sie gelegentlich energisch versichern, tatsächlich 1921 und nicht 1917 geboren zu sein, wie es zeitweise in Lexika nachzuschlagen war." Jmar67 (talk) 00:11, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: No conflict, right? We have to state the other also, because some serious other sources, and our own article until yesterday, said so. I will look now if the recordings got miraculously referenced while I slept. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:33, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year of birth 

message: I had dropped DECCA to lowercase in my previous edits but you have restored to uppercase in one spot (but not another). Our articles do not use the all-caps version except to illustrate actual record labels styled "DECCA". The company name is lowercase, and that is what the reference should be to.  Jmar67 (talk) 11:25, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I returned to Decca without even seeing this ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:09, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  DECCA vs. Decca 

message: At the moment, all facts have some reference. Sometimes details such as a date or a colleague may be without. Wishes:
* Links to opera houses (or towns, if not known)
* Reviews (some are there, but so far only to reference a recording exists)
* More historic context
* More what performed where with whom, instead of only role in opera, period
* More bio details, she was married twice, had a child
This may be a note to self ;) - but after several hours dedicated to her - remembering Elektra all the time - I'll turn to normal editing and going outside! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:16, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update 

message: I found this which may be interesting enough to add to the article, but have no time right now. I'll add it to Ernst Gutstein, there will be a ref to copy. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:03, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recording, with review
Talk:Ingemar Johansson

message: I MAY be able to put a photo of Mr. Johansson on his bio page. Does anybody know how to do this? I have asked for a copyright release and it is possible a much needed image will become available.
The page it comes from is: 
http://www.brynje.no/public/index.php?set_language=no&cccpage=historikkMark Preston 18:55, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo for this page

message: Is boxer Ingemar Johansson distantly related to actress Scarlett Johansson?  Does anyone know anything about this?  Or, are there simply a lot of "Johanssons" in the Scandinavian region of Europe?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.63.78.76 (talk) 22:15, August 29, 2007 (UTC) 
:I'm pretty sure there is no relation given she has Danish roots and he is from Sweden. Johansson is quite common surname and given its patronymic origin (Johansson = son of Johan) there is certainly numerous Nordic families with this name. Hookoo (talk) 13:14, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relation to? 

message: In the table in the external links section he is only listed as European Heavyweight Champion once, it should be twice, because he became European Heavyweight Champion before he became World champion. After he lost his World Heavyweight Champion title he had been automatically stripped of his European Heavyweight Champion, so he took that title back in 1962. The first time he became European Heavyweight Champion was in 1956, see the text in section Early career. Roger491127 (talk) 11:33, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: European Heavyweight Champion twice
Talk:Inger Lorre

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- KenWalker | Talk 08:19, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: There was a paragraph in the bio that used two sources, reliable, to paint a picture that was very much POV.  It painted Lorre as a drug addict responsible for bringing down the band in three sentences.  This does not provide undue weight for other circumstances involving the band's issues.  Feel free to discuss and reinsert when we can make it balanced.  Keegan (talk) 07:52, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: To confirm, did you mean to write "does not provide undue weight"? It seems to contradict your next sentence where you note the information is not balanced. --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 15:54, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

text: Wait, you removed two factual paragraphs because they didn't provide "balance"? If you know of cite-able facts that can provide that balance, by all means put them in the article. However, those paragraphs shouldn't have been removed. I saw nothing in them that was incorrect or slanted. Hondo77 (talk) 23:52, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weird paragraph 

message: This article is full of a biased PoV with some parts almost reading like a press release. Someone with more time should fix it up a bit. 
danzig138 (talk) 07:14, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Strong PoV
Talk:Inger Nilsson

message: From the article, it seems she played one significant role, and is otherwise entirely un-notable. Any information on that role can be included in Pippi_Longstocking, no?
:It was a very notable role.  If you grew up in the USA in the right time period, you'd know exactly who she was, and if you grew up in Sweden, I'm guessing, she's a minor celeb.  Keep it.GeeZee (talk) 00:24, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: More well known in Sweden, where she has done some other acting too, than in the U.S., I'd say. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 11:51, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable?
Talk:Ingibjörg Sólrún Gísladóttir

message: This IcelandReview article says Ingibjörg Sólrún is a possible new PM, and if so she would become the first openly gay PM in the world. I would have thought that was notable. Loganberry (Talk) 21:44, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You getting her mixed up with Jóhanna Sigurðardóttir! Physchim62 (talk) 21:50, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sexuality 

message: I am Icelandic and I beg to differ with the first line:
The title of this article is an Icelandic name; the last name is a patronymic or matronymic, not a family name; the person is properly referred to by the given name Ingibjörg Sólrún.
It is true that in social or with known associates, one would use either the first name or the first and middle name
 to address the person. HOWEVER, in most formal functions, one is referred to by their FIRST AND LAST NAMES.  Example:
 my name is Njal Jon Magnusson.  In a formal function, I would initially be addressed as "Njal Magnusson".
Who wrote this first line??  The person IS NOT PROPERLY REFERRED TO AS Ingibjörg Sólrún!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.231.48.40 (talk) 17:48, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: In a formal function, I would initially be addressed as "Njal Magnusson" Umm, no? What sort of formal function are you talking about? You might introduce yourself as Njáll Magnússon but I have a hard time imagining a situation where someone would address you in that way unless there were some risk of confusion otherwise. In any case, the convention in writing is to introduce a person with her or his full name and then refer to her or him with her given names on subsequent reference. That's what this boilerplate is attempting to describe. Haukur (talk) 17:58, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

text: Yes, when asked "Hvað heitir þú?", it's sometimes reasonable to give the patronymic as well as the given names. One way to do it, perhaps a pedantic one, is to say: "Ég heiti Haukur og er Þorgeirsson". But in the rest of that conversation no-one would ever use the patronymic as part of an address unless, conceivably, if another Haukur were present. Even then, it would feel stilted and strange. Haukur (talk) 20:01, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  First Line
Talk:Ingo Rademacher

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- KenWalker | Talk 07:45, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: I've removed the following:
:He currently lives in Pacific Palisades, California. It is rumored that Ingo is in the closet about his homosexuality. . There is also a rumor rotating that he and his friends pretend to be straight in gay bars. 
First of all, rumors aren't encyclopedic.  Secondly, pages on Angelfire and Tripod aren't considered reliable sources by any stretch of the imagination.  If a valid source can be found for the info, please feel free to re-add.  Thanks! -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 16:03, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  LGBT 

message: "There is a rumor spread all over Hollywood that Ingo is a closeted homosexual, living with a male companion." - Removed because a rumor does not belong in an encyclopedia. 76.168.187.251 (talk) 03:23, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed

message: Is it really necessary that The opening sentence mentions Rademacher as a prominent anti vaxxer? 80.39.32.136 (talk) 22:18, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening line
Talk:Ingram Marshall

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- KenWalker | Talk 07:38, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Ingrid Chavez

message: I'm just noting here that if Chavez was born in 1965 and moved to Minneapolis in 1987, then she was not 17 when she moved to Minneapolis as stated in this article, she was 22. Or, I suppose, she moved to Minneapolis in 1982, not 1987. Since I don't know which one is true, I didn't edit the page. Math is hard. 2601:643:8500:2F20:15B:D76:6789:CBB1 (talk) 17:04, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age Discrepancy
Talk:Ingrid Marie Rivera

message: * Removed "Ingrid enjoys watching movies, acting, reading, socializing, listening to music and writing poetry." because it looked like a dating profile. Charleenmerced 17:45, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Since this is the English wikipedia, references should be to sites/pages in English.  Non-English references should be avoided, unless there is no other option.  --ShakataGaNai 20:33, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia's policy is to use reliable sources, regardless of the source's language.--The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 09:26, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-English References 

message: I also believe that it would be important to present some of the images used during the Today show and which are the core of the controversy. I got some of them but have no idea how to include them in the article. All of them fit the Fair Use rule and all of them have been presented on TV (National Media) and print. Could you help me with this, please? Worldnewsjunkie (talk) 01:46, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Added section to comment from Dec. 2007

message: http://www.bittenandbound.com/2008/08/07/lil-kims-party-guest-ingrid-rivera-found-dead-on-roof/
http://stupidcelebrities.net/2008/08/07/ingrid-rivera-photo-found-dead-after-attending-lil-kims-birthday-party/
http://www.nypost.com/seven/08072008/news/regionalnews/slay_at_bash_for_lil_kim_123404.htm
http://guanabee.com/2008/08/queens-resident-ingrid-rivera-found-dead-at-site-of-lil-kim-party-murderer-found
nevermind found an actual credible article
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/08/nyregion/08club.html?hp  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.96.34.35 (talk) 13:06, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is She dead?
Talk:Ingrid Schulerud

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- KenWalker | Talk 07:16, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Ingrid Vandebosch

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- KenWalker | Talk 07:13, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Ingvar Ambjørnsen

message: This sentence "his debut novel was a semi-autobiography called 23-salen ("The 23rd Row"), in which he criticized Norway's efforts to take care of psychically challenged individuals." suggests Ambjørnsen is somehow psychically challenged. I think if this is the case then the article should state that explicitly. and if not, perhaps this sentence could be modified. 212.29.231.179 (talk) 08:49, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  psychically challenged 