Talk:Tripura Sundari

message: I propose that Sri Yantra be merged into this page under the appropriate section. Or the content related to Sri Yantra on this page be transferred t the Wiki page on Sri Yantra Karthik (talk) 09:15, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: * The merge discussion concerning Lalita and Tripura Sundari has been placed on the Vaishnava wikiproject talk page, Suggested merge for Lalita with Tripura Sundari article. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 22:18, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Lalita be transformed into a disambig. The current be split into 2: Lalita(gopi) and the other part be merged into this article.--Redtigerxyz (talk) 05:29, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Potential merge with Lalita discussion

message: Note:  Project Banner with Tripura workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Tripura or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 11:10, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Tripura Addition 

message: ** As it is said in Lalita sahasranama, 'Na shathaya na dushtaya na vishwasaya karhichith sri mathra bhakti yuktaya sri vidya raja vediney'.... 
This quote in the article is not part of the official 'Lalitaa Sahasranaama', not correctly transcribed, apparently not even sanskrit. Please correct. Tantric faiths tend to be very complex; please treat them with due accuracy!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.49.84.1 (talk) 22:06, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  This does really need to be addressed. I've moved this section down to the bottom of the article in a Sri Vidya subsection, but will need time to pull references and rewrite the section totally. Shakta Scholar (talk) 23:56, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  UPDATE: I've removed this entirely and replaced it with a single line and a link to the Sri Vidya page. The entire section was irrelevant to the discussion of the goddess, not to mention unsupported by references, and written from a non-objective point of view. I would recommend to future authors that any discussion of Sri Vidya on this page be directly related to Tripurasundari specifically. Shakta Scholar (talk) 15:30, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please correct: 

message: the monier williams explanation of PURA in TRIPURA is problematically specific. Maybe if we included an explanation of the legend of the TRIPURA it would make sense, but it seems to make the section confusing. Three cities seems the simplest and most accurate translation to present first (we all know Monier Williams didn't know much about tantra when he made his dictionary). Alternately, Christopher Wallis translates this as Three Citadels (in Tantra Illuminated) and claims they refer to her three forms. The translation of three worlds is obviously poetic and not literal, which is fine if presented as such. But the literal translation, Beautiful Woman (Sundari) of the Three Cities/Citadels (Tripura) is very difficult to glean from this section as is. Iṣṭa Devatā (talk) 16:21, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  tripura etymology 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Tripura Sundari. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130728040718/http://sripoornamahameru.org/downloads/ to http://sripoornamahameru.org/downloads/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:58, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I check pages listed in :Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of :Tripura Sundari's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "Debbarma1996":
From List of Indian state and union territory name etymologies: 
From Tripura: 
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 19:51, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphaned references in [[:Tripura Sundari]] 

message: Hi   I am suggesting to move from Tripura Sundari to Lalita Tripura Sundari. Since it is the full and actual name. And also more than Tripura Sundari the name "Lalita" is more famous. We can go with that if possible  as "Lalita (goddess)" or "Lalita Devi". What is your opinion on this -  MRRaja001 (talk) 15:31, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: She is known by various name - Shodashi, Lalita, Rajarajeshwari, Tripura. S. Shankaranarayan, Kinsley, Frawley call her Tripura-sundari in their books on the Mahavidyas. I suggest no change in name. Also, Gaudiya Vaishnavas regard Lalita as the chief gopi of Krishna-Radha and thus a goddess. --Redtigerxyz  Talk  15:57, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: In most of the sources I encountered, Tripura Sundari is more commonly used..245CMR.•👥📜 16:04, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:   Okay, I agree with you. -  MRRaja001 (talk) 16:15, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding Page move from Tripura Sundari to Lalita Tripura Sundari 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:08, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: This section on her legend is almost unintelligible. It needs thorough editing. 75.162.188.28 (talk) 23:19, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for pointing that out! Skyerise (talk) 00:29, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unintelligible