lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Titlo

message: Seems strange that all article is in the past tense. But the titlo is normally used in modern Church Slavonic texts. --Koryakov Yuri 16:22, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I just fixed that. I also thought the text was a bit wordy in places. TCC (talk) (contribs) 06:33, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Past tense 

message: I am convinced the example shown in Figure 2 is incorrect.
It uses the lower-case letter "buki" (б), whereas it should use a soft sign (ь) instead. The abbreviated word is spelled out fully as "Господь", not "Господб". The actual text of the article (sans graphical example) supports this.
The version of Feb 21st appears to have used the correct character, albeit in a low-res pixel format.
A related minor quibble: I certainly salute the replacement of the tiny PNG files with these nice SVG's. However, considering this particular replacement, I would respectfully question the choice of such a modern typeface as an example for a writing mode that is predominantly historical.
81.17.231.158 15:50, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The best way to determine which is accurate would be to find a reliable source showing how it should be. ((1 == 2) ? (('Stop') : ('Go')) 17:50, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The best way is to restore original photocopies, which were replaced by samodel (someone's hack), which I did. `'Míkka 00:02, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible error in example? 

message: Use of a horizontal line to indicate an abbreviation is common, not to say ubiquitous, in Latin liturgical manuscripts from the earliest period (late antique) on. 43hellokitty21 (talk) 12:47, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abbreviations in Latin Mss
Talk:Arjun (MBT)

message: The artilce seems to pretty biased toward pro-arjun arguments. Some of the text seems to come from the marketing brochure put out by the manufacturer, for example, the paragragh about the "wolfpack network", which on close readeing does not really say anything about what the capability actually is.
This tank was discussed in the article "worlds worst tanks" on Strategy page (http://www.strategypage.com/dls/articles/20054172327.asp)
shouldn't this article discuss some of the pro and anti viewpoints on this tank?
--203.214.93.127 07:53, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about its failings?
Talk:Iotation

message: In Serbian, plural of 'grana' is 'grane'. 'Granje' is mass noun (if it is correct term in English) - Serbian 'gradivna imenica'. In the same manner, plural of list is listovi, "lišće" is mass noun. Column name should be changed and text should be adapted accordingly.Saigon from europe 13:13, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, though note that that table is about letters, not the sounds they make. Is "Tje" used in English as name for Ћ? Nikola 06:38, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong plural

message: Please give any reason why the abovementioned letters were historically iotified. Where and when they are supposed to be so? Alone Coder (talk) 20:51, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  И, Ѻ, Ѡ 

message: I visited this page because of "see also" of the article "palatalization". There it says "Iotation, a related process in Slavic languages". Now here, I read "It should not be confused with palatalization, which is an entirely different process".--2.246.17.248 (talk) 17:10, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link 

message: This article mixes up two things: (1.) the development that occurred in Proto-Slavic from earlier C + /j/, and (2.) the existence of palatalised consonants in several modern Slavic languages, most notably Russian. There is some overlap between the two, but they are absolutely not the same thing. For example, Slavic palatalised /t'/ yields Russian /tɕ/, while Slavic palatalised /b'/ yields Russian /bl'/. Russian /t'/ and /b'/ accordingly have different origins, namely other sound changes that occurred later on. 
The Slavic languages have a perpetual tendency to produce sibilants and palatals. There are at least six processes that must be distinguished: (1.) Balto-Slavic satemisation, (2.) First Proto-Slavic palatalisation, (3.) Second Proto-Slavic palatalisation, (4.) Third Proto-Slavic palatalisation, (5.) Iotation, (6.) further palatalisation in the individual Slavic languages (e.g. Russian /t'/, Polish <ć>). An effort should be made to distinguish them more clearly. 88.64.225.53 (talk) 20:02, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Iotation vs. palatalised consonants in modern Slavic languages
Talk:Fartlek

message: can someone tell me which is more effective - farlek or interval training when you are cycling?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.242.104.100 (talk) 15:09, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: At least Oxford English Dictionary, MSN Encarta, and American Heritage Dictionary translate it as "speed play". --Nikai 13:42, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems clear to me that "fartlek" isn't an English word. Hence I will delete it from the list of Swedish words that has been exported into the English language Boeing720 (talk) 03:44, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article mentions the Karvonen method, and then says the intensity should be between 60% and 80% of the maximum heart rate. If you read the section on the Karvonen method, that ought to be the resting heart rate plus 60/80% of the difference between the resting rate and maximum rate.
A similar mistake is made in the heart rate diagram included in the Aerobic exercise article. I have pointed the mistake there, although other articles which link to it are Anaerobic exercise and Heart rate
Zfishwiki (talk) 20:57, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Karvonen method
Talk:Bovril

message: Hello! During late June, July and some of August, I'm working on a paid project sponsored by the National Trust to review and enhance coverage of NT sites. You can find the pilot edits here, as well as a statement and contact details for the National Trust. I am leaving this message when I make a first edit to a page; please do get in touch if you have any concerns. Lajmmoore (talk) 08:53, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  National Trust pilot 

message: There is an American made spread that is made under the name Bovrite.  Due to US import laws, Bovril cannot be imported, so this product is for, largely, the UK expat market.  Thoughts on sourced inclusion? Surv1v4l1st ╠Talk║Contribs╣ 02:40, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bovrite? 

message: Never heard it called that. Is there a reference? 2A01:4B00:F642:E200:6CF3:DC80:7573:2F64 (talk) 15:55, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  beef tea?
Talk:Vladimir Bartol

message: As I understand it, Vladimir Bartol is a lot more important figure than one would glean from the article, and Alamut is generally counted as the masterpiece of 20th-century Slovene literature. Can someone confirm this and add some relevant citation, etc.? -- Jmabel | Talk 23:09, Nov 25, 2004 (UTC)
:I don't think so. Alamut is not a masterpiece and Bartol is quite a marginal figure. --Eleassar my talk 17:02, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Bartol's role has been positively re-valuated in the last decades, but I would agree with Eleassar. Viator slovenicus (talk) 08:37, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Eysteinn

message: When I look at the name "Östen" and "Eystein", its compounds seem to mean "Island-Stone", is this correct?
:According to Nationalencyklopedin, it is probably derived from auja meaning "happiness" and stone (meaning that he is tough).--Wiglaf 09:11, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Alexander Bard

message: enwiki says he's born in Motala. Swedish Wikipedia says he was born in Bloemfontein in South Africa. What's correct? Jobjörn (Talk ° contribs) 12:44, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ... and his webpage () says he was born in Linköping... Jobjörn (Talk ° contribs) 12:52, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd say he was born in "Hindu Linköping" then. You know, in the town in "Zoroastrian Sweden" thats up there between "Buddhist Norway" and "Jain Denmark", just to the west of "Muslim Finland" on the "Bahai Baltic". Cripes. -- Fullstop 12:48, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed both issues. -- Fullstop 13:01, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthplace 

message: I've removed the following sentence from the "Religious and political views" section:
:Bard has on many occasions, in online debates and in conference speeches, advocated a return to the Pantheist original form of the religion known by its followers as the Mazdayasna interpretation of Zoroastrianism.
Now, I see no evidence that Bard is advocating such a thing, but the sentence is itself soapboxing such a position, and given the elementary incorrectness of the premises, I've removed it per WP:BLP. Formally, the faults lie in "Pantheist original form" and "known [...] as the Mazdayasna interpretation of Zoroastrianism". There is no such "pantheist original form" (Bard isn't in a position to decide the value of anything anyway) and "Mazdayasna" is not some special "interpretation of Zoroastrianism" but a common Avestan language word that merely means (quite literally) "worship of Mazda".If -- as the editor is suggesting -- Bard is advocating a pantheist interpretation, then this has to be duly written as 
:"Bard advocates his own pantheistic interpretation of Gathic Zoroastrianism, and recycles the generic Avestan language term "Mazdayasna" to denote this interpretation."
But I don't think Bard does anything of the kind. In a Yahoo groups thread datelined "Monday, June 30, 2008, 4:53 PM" he wrote "We are just going to have to accept that there are full-blown Zoroastrians who are theist, atheist and pantheist and all kinds of varieties in between. The Gathas do not support any specific stand in itself on this issue. At least certainly not any theist-dualist dogma." Either way, we can't have WP advocating on Bard's behalf. -- Fullstop (talk) 01:40, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed per BLP/SOAP 

message: What's with this "philosopher" stuff? What academic degree, and what genre? Rursus dixit. (mbork3!) 14:29, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: He promotes some kind of existentialist reasoning in the current high-tech IT environment, citation still needed. Rursus dixit. (mbork3!) 06:40, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Philosopher
Talk:Nmap

message: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nmap&diff=141407137&oldid=141407023
Ojw (talk) 15:04, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have restored it, since the edit that deleted it gave no reason for doing so.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.232.228.174 (talk) 19:12, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: What happened to the "In popular culture" section? 

message: Should there be a section, or perhaps a seperate article on Zenmap, the GUI version of nmap? Willbennett2007 (talk) 14:41, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zenmap? 

message: There are a bunch of movies. I think it is safe to guess that this is the definite *hacker tool* according to recent popular culture :)
(see Bourne Ultimatum, Die Hard 4, Girl with Dragon Tattoo, The Listening, 13: Game of Death, Battle Royale, Broken Saints, and on and on) – 93.104.43.135 (talk) 10:04, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  More popular culture
Talk:Verus

message: ----
I've made this a disambiguation page, since Lucius Verus is, arguably, a very significant Verus also (eg, a real Emperor).  Perhaps Senator Verus deserves his own page, especially if more info could be added, and maybe if the first/last/clan/family name could be found?  --Ds13 00:01, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Richard Nixon mask

message: "The masks are generally worn by folks raising both arms with hands extended in form of the peace sign reciting Nixon's phrase "I am not a crook"" 
This statement seems flawed. I mean, if someone is wearing the mask for more than a few seconds they are certainly not  usually standing in that pose. Is there a way of re-phrasing this that is true, yet doesn't sound like "a fun thing to do when wearing the Nixon mask is to make the V-sign with both hands and say "I am not a crook""? (And can I point out that he wasn't in that pose when he said those words? Not that it matters). -R. fiend 03:54, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Comment: True, but this one appears to be particularly timeless and notable.  —RaD Man (talk) 07:03, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)

message: :looks like there is one now —Pengo 05:31, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture?

message: 1.) The prevalence of Nixon masks as a disguise among robbers
2.) The frequent and odd association between Nixon masks and sexual acts  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.149.181.145 (talk) 05:08, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Two things that should be mentioned
Talk:Classic book

message: Recently the photo of Sainte-Beuve was deleted with the edit summary "causes formatting issues". I've reverted that deletion, let's all discuss if the photograph should stay or go, if the size needs to be changed, what the "formatting issues" are (depending on the viewer's editing program - wikitext version...classic or 2022?/visual editor/monoskin or whatever/etc. - what one editor/reader sees when they view Wikipedia is not necessarily what a different reader sees). So, let's discuss. Shearonink (talk) 13:46, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent deletion of Sainte-Beuve photograph
Talk:Battle Angel Alita

message: ANN Jason Thompson
--KrebMarkt (talk) 21:46, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review(s) 

message: In the Manga section under Media:
Paragraph 2 says Gunnm: Another Stories was "published in Ultra Jump from January 24, 1997 to December 19, 2006" and "released in a single volume on December 19, 2007."
Paragraph 3 is about Gunnm: Complete Edition, which is says was "released in Japan on December 23, 1998" and included "rough sketches, a timeline and three short stories published later as Gunnm: Another Stories."
This isn't necessarily a contradiction (the 3rd paragraph could referring to the 2007 single-volume collection of Another Stories), but it's definitely not clear.  Paragraph 3 makes it sound like the stories debuted in the Complete Edition, while paragraph 2 makes it sound like they debuted in Ultra Jump.  Can anyone clarify?
66.104.231.82 (talk) 19:41, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing/contradictory publication dates for Gunnm: Another Stories (Gunnm Gaiden) 
Talk:Waitematā Harbour

message: It contains Waiheke Island, but not Rangitoto.? Rubbish. Both of these islands are in the Hauraki Gulf, and neither are in the Waitemata. GrutnessGrutness talk  01:09, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Waiheke Island not in the harbour

message: Can it take Panamax ships fully laden?
Does it belong here: List of deep water ports?
Tabletop 02:38, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: According to this (page 5), the Waitemata port is one of five Panamax-capable ports in New Zealand, the others being Taranaki, Lyttelton, Tauranga and Otago. Both Tauranga and Auckland have some post-Panamax facilities. -- Avenue 13:57, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  What size ships? 

message: The first image in panoramas is not displaying properly... is this a MediaWiki bug? Joe SchmedleyTalk 22:32, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps. The problem was that the markup for an earlier image was missing the final "]]" (which I've fixed), but I don't see why this should affect the display of the next image. -- Avenue (talk) 00:48, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 

message: Please help me 2407:7000:9F10:B400:8964:6CB7:7F43:2655 (talk) 06:19, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  What forms of transport are available in waitemata
Talk:Harlequin (disambiguation)

message: I think there's also a type of duck called a Harlequin. But it's not listed in the disambiguation article. --Dara 01:17, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Can someone add a refence in the 'literature' section to the appearance of the Harlequin in Grant Morrison's graphic novel The Invisibles. S/He's a great character. Check volume 2 of the series, issue 7..Since Grant is such a swell guy, I think this should be included here.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.167.78.6 (talk • contribs) 14:50, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Grant Morrison

message: "Harlequin" should also be mentioned as a category / classification for precious stones, that is highly prized and sought after. It is when they are extremely multicolored & variegated in color, so much so that it looks splashed and/or speckled with every different color, and the light can reflect different coloration from different angles. There can even be a highly prismatic effect. For examples of this just type in "harlequin opal" on eBay and see some of the most expensive gems sold on that site. 4.255.54.124 (talk) 06:18, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  precious stones.... 

message: its not mentioned here yet I hear this expression alot in the jewelry world.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.5.164.188 (talk) 06:26, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is a Harlequin Pattern?
Talk:Pidgeon

message: Wrong spelling - should be "pigeon"—Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.164.210.211 (talk • contribs) 01:33, 26 November 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Created note

message: Discussion of where this page should redirect is taking place on Talk:Pigeon (disambiguation). -- JHunterJ 20:40, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect target discussion
Talk:Halo (franchise)

message: .
Installation 01 got a burst of coverage back in the day, but it effectively doesn't exist as a product. Coming up on eight years since it was announced, there's not even a playable form of the game anymore; they announced back in July they were switching engines and that most content besides art and design was lost. More to the point, that news and anything since the burst of coverage from 2015 and 2017 hasn't been covered in secondary sources, and most of what's currently in the article is prose line lists of things that didn't come to fruition or are obviated by more recent events (there's PC versions of Halo now.) This feels like something that can be covered in the main article in context with other fan efforts. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 19:53, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging [[Installation 01]] 

message: The redirect Penitent tangent has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Utopes (talk / cont) 17:51, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Penitent tangent]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The standalone notability of Forge mode is questionable, to me—coverage doesn't revolve around the Forge mode itself, but just occasional minor coverage of stuff like Forge recreations or game modes. It can effectively be discussed, and whatever impact it had, in the descriptions of the games, and legacy section of this article. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 15:58, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge [[Forge (level editor)]]
Talk:Shell Crisis of 1915

message: Look at the assertion:
"Lord Northcliffe, the owner of The Times and the Daily Mail, blamed Kitchener (Secretary of State for War) for the recent death in action of his nephew. [4]"
If this refers to V. S. T. Harmsworth, and I think it does, then someone has their chronology out, because in May, 1915 Vere was still alive. He was killed in 
action at the Battle of the Ancre in November 1916.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.100.213.3 (talk) 15:38, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: 1915 - WW2 ? Surely WW1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Syd1435  (talk • contribs) 02:00, 26 November 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: 'Supplies and factories in British Commonwealth countries, particularly Canada, were reorganized under the Imperial Munitions Board, which ensured adequate supplies of shells for the remainder of the war.' seems somewhat over done considering that insufficient shells were available for the Somme in 1916, and those shells that were available were not primarily high explosive. I'm changing this to 'which attempted to ensure' unless anyone has objection. Roche-Kerr 21:56, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  'adequate' 

message: Because it doesn't make sense, I'm changing this part of the last sentence in the first para: 'a significant factor in the increase of decisions for a new Prime Minister during the political crisis of 1916.' I think this may be an adequate replacement: 'a significant factor in the forcing out of Asquith as Prime Minister, in favor of Lloyd George, during the political crisis of 1916'. Joconnor (talk) 20:26, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replacing 'increase of decisions' in First Para 

message: Did a quick, drive-by, coronavirus shielded ce, rv dupe wl, auto ed, citations scan, moved references and citations to the foot added missing reference details.Keith-264 (talk) 09:13, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  CE 

message: Barnbow not mentioned in list, after all it was top secret. 2A00:23C6:3496:501:B030:1403:CDFD:11BA (talk) 18:46, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explosions at WW1 munitions factories
Category talk:Visual arts

message: Johnbod 05:01, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There already is a :Category:Printmaking. Clubmarx 07:41, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Printmaking should be a sub-category not just a page 

message: Is there a deep reason for :Category:Visual arts to be a Main topic classification when it necessarily belongs to :Category:Arts? Is there violent objection to removing it from :Category:Main topic classifications? I am not attempting to re-open the May 2006 proposal to merge this category into Arts, which I would've opposed if I'd been on Wiki. back then. But it's just sloppy to have Visual arts in Arts and have them both in Main topic classifications. — Robert Greer 20:07, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Main topic classifications 

message: The above was posted over a month ago and no comment has been made; I shall remove :Category:Visual arts from Main topic classification if there is no objection in the next 48 hours. — Robert Greer 03:04, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  no objection 

message: Done. — Robert Greer (talk) 23:11, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  done
Talk:Haleakalā

message: "and its location above one-third of the atmosphere" Is this vandalism, or am I missing something? 10,000 feet isn't even one third of the troposphere (avg 58,000 feet). o0drogue0o 07:54, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This statement refers to the mass of the atmosphere.  Approximately one third of the mass of the atmosphere (not quite) lies below 10,000 feet. — Myasuda (talk) 14:36, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Astrophysical research