lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:An Experimental Enquiry Concerning the Source of the Heat which is Excited by Friction

message: Dear fellow Wikipedians,
I have taken the liberty of adding "Notes" and "Citations" subsections. This includes a new style of referencing, i.e. using short citations linked to references in a separate "Sources" section below. To anyone who is annoyed by this change I apologize beforehand. I do think that the references look clearer now though. Please feel free to modify or undo any of my edits as deemed appropriate.
Best regards, The Cosmic Ocean (talk) 10:49, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Some wikilinks that were inside notes and references are gone. They were not deliberately removed. When the text of the notes were copied into new templates, the links were not properly copied with it. They may be easily restored. The Cosmic Ocean (talk) 13:34, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changed some references into notes and short citations
Talk:We All Use Math Every Day

message: I've ordered the kit and will be revising this article as soon as I have more information. --HomerNet 6:00 PM, June 24, 2004 (Pacific)
ye5 1ndeed we d0.
Um, We All Use Math Every Day isn't a book, it's a program, I don't think it should be under this project.--CmaccompH89 08:00, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Symphony-Concerto (Prokofiev)

message: Movement headings: according to Prokofiev.org 
dead and possibly dangerous link, can we remove from here?, has been replaced by reference to B&H score as below Schissel | Sound the Note! 01:03, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

message: :"On February 10, 1948 the Soviet Central Committee decided that Prokofiev should be considered a "suspect" musician. His work was disparaged as bourgeois and formalistic, and his first wife was convicted as a spy and taken to a forced-labor camp. These misfortunes and the possibility of being arrested without reason most likely affected Prokofiev's already deteriorating health."
This doesn't seem to have any relation to the writing or performance of the symphony-concerto. Surely it should be cut? - 152.76.1.244 (talk) 04:29, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed it is not very relevant. I replaced it with something maybe more satisfactory. I hope somebody will expand this whole article to a reasonable size. Opus131 (talk) 00:36, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Superfluous paragraph?

message: the movement headings are
# Andante
#  Allegro giusto
#   Andante con moto; Allegro 
not as listed. Whence the discrepancy? Schissel | Sound the Note! 21:58, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: movement headings

message: A large "Russian Legends" series from Brilliant Classics devoted to various pianists, violinists and two cellists (Rostropovich and Shafran) includes, on the first (no. 8713-84, I think; CD no.84, specifically)  of 10 CDs devoted to Rostropovich, a December 27 1972 concert with Rostropovich/Kondrashin/Moscow Phil., this work and Myaskovsky's concerto. Worth a mention?... Schissel | Sound the Note! 01:01, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Older newly released live "recording"- worth adding?...
Talk:White cane

message: I have received some freeimages of canes which I have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons and used in this article. I don't know much about image placement, so if someone could help in that department that'd be good. Graham87 08:52, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Images uploaded

message: I had a hard time finding sources for this. In the US it's estimated that only 2% of visually impaired Americans use canes so I wanted to find more facts/cites for this section which i am including here. Any help appreciated. Jessamyn (talk) 18:07, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this would be very hard to find a reliable source for, but in my very limited experience, it seems to be more or less true. I've taken the liberty of removing the section properly and fixing the copy of it on the talk page. I was surprised by your comment about only 2% of visually impaired people in the US using canes, but I found this source, which cites figures of between 2% and 8%. Graham87 12:09, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comparison to Guide dogs?
Talk:Ada Deer

message: Same text, one has her real name--no brainer. Leo1410 22:01, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging with [[Ada deer]] 

message: Is this the same Ada Deer as the Ada Elizabeth Deer mentioned in this article? The hometown and tribe are mentioned as the same (Keshena, Wisconsin and Menominee). - Whisperjanes (talk) 02:27, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Columbia Pictures role?
Talk:Neighborhoods of Waco, Texas

message: I propose this page be merged with the article of Waco, Texas.  This article doesn't contain any cited facts and repeats information already stated in the Waco, Texas article.  Therefore it is my recommendation that 14 days from today this merge be completed.  Alan.ca 22:03, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: This article divides Waco into sectors but a more accurate method would be to use the neighborhood associations. The town is divided by neighborhood into 24 associations that define the town more accurately than the method used in this article. A map of the associations can be found at: http://www.waco-texas.com/leadership/neighborhoodsmap.PDF 12:01, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neighborhoods 

message: I've noticed that Beverly Hills appears twice here; once with surrounding cities and with sectors not fitting in a side.  Judging from the map, it seems to fit in the South Side.  Thoughts?  Millertime 4:44, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Beverly Hills
Talk:Antineutrino

message: The article Neutrino claims that more than 50 trillion solar electron neutrinos pass through the human body every second. How is this with anitneutrinos? What is the health implication? -- Eiland (talk) 13:14, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The Sun does not produce antineutrinos. Even if it would, there would be no health implications at all - just as neutrinos, antineutrinos only interact very rarely (through the weak interaction). --Blennow (talk) 17:00, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Solar antineutrinos
Talk:Amalie Skram

message: This article was previously deleted as not notable. I believe it is (one need only look at the interwiki articles in Norwegian, Danish, German & Swedish to get some sense of the recognition that Amalie has earned). Please have the courtesy of contacting me if you intend to propose deletion. Thanks - Williamborg (Bill) 22:05, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article was previously deleted as not notable

message: thumb|120px|right|Statue of Amalie Skram in Bergen
Anyone have a photo of the statue of Amalie in Bergen that they can contribute to Wikipedia. I took one years ago, but can not find it now. Williamborg (Bill) 22:07, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Excellent! Anywhere would be fine. We can fine tune it once you've posted. Thanks - Williamborg (Bill) 01:24, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Statue of Amalie in Bergen  
Talk:Oregon Republican Party

message: Does the ideology section mean leaning, (Liberal/Conservative?
LordBoreal51 20:40, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ideology 

message: The first paragraph says that it is based in Tigard, Oregon, but the info bar on the side says it is based in Salem, so which is it?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.70.235.146 (talk) 23:35, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Its been updated to Lake O since your comment. 01:33, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Headquarters 

message: First time commenting on a talk page! Anyways, shouldn't the picture of the Lincoln be taken off? It does not seem very applicable here. Yes, Lincoln was a Republican, but perhaps an Oregon Republican would be a better choice?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.101.211.12 (talk) 15:20, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, and much of the article needs to be re-written after it appears a party employee/supporter added a bunch of things that are basically WP:NOT and by Wikipedia standards has decreased the quality. Aboutmovies (talk) 01:33, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abraham Lincoln as image? 

message: I believe the ORP has removed anti-gay marriage language from the platform as of 2011...
http://www.oregonlive.com/politics/index.ssf/2011/09/oregon_gop_removes_anti-gay_la.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.164.122.33 (talk) 16:30, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oregon Republican Party & Same Sex Marriage 

message: See here: https://pamplinmedia.com/pt/9-news/499626-400115-oregon-gop-facing-the-elephant-in-the-room -Pete Forsyth (talk) 18:07, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  In-depth article in Portland Tribune, 2021
Talk:Archimedean point

message: On http://jeff560.tripod.com/o.html it says " ORTHOCENTER. An earlier term was Archimedean point. "
can somebody colloborate this?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by WillemienH (talk • contribs) 22:41, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  old name for [[orthocenter]]?
Template talk:Framebox

message: I have translated the contents of this template into English. I also changed the title because I don't believe a French template title will be helpful... Anyway, if anyone have a better name for this template, feel free to move it! AQu01rius (User • Talk) 22:16, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks a lot ! Jmfayard 14:02, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation
Talk:The Faithful Anchor

message: In order to meet the notability requirements for an album, the band must itself be notable.  The band's pages, however, do not mention any external media references to the band or its albums.  Nor has the band won any awards, been in rotation on a radio station, had any charted hits, or any of the multitude of possible notability requirements.  Therefore I conclude that this album is not notable, and should be deleted. Please see: Wikipedia:Notability (music). Jonemerson 22:12, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:The Magic Hedge

message: In order to meet the notability requirements for an album, the band must itself be notable.  The band's pages, however, do not mention any external media references to the band or its albums.  Nor has the band won any awards, been in rotation on a radio station, had any charted hits, or any of the multitude of possible notability requirements.  Therefore I conclude that this album is not notable, and should be deleted. Please see: Wikipedia:Notability (music). Jonemerson 22:12, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Stateless (Unwed Sailor and Early Day Miners album)

message: In order to meet the notability requirements for an album, the band must itself be notable.  The band's pages, however, do not mention any external media references to the band or its albums.  Nor has the band won any awards, been in rotation on a radio station, had any charted hits, or any of the multitude of possible notability requirements.  Therefore I conclude that this album is not notable, and should be deleted. Please see: Wikipedia:Notability (music). Jonemerson 22:12, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Programmable interval timer

message: Would it possible for somebody to get information on how the PIT is activated for this page?
Jatos 22:17, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

message: The comment regarding about the PIT having a separate crystal is wrong. The original IBM PCs had a single 14.31818 MHz crystal (four times the NTSC colourburst rate) for everything. It was divided by 3 to get 4.77MHz for the CPU and 12 to get 1.19MHz for the PIT. Thus the exact rate is (30*525*227.5)/(1.001*3) = 1193181.8181... Hz.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.153.27.229 (talk) 10:41, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  PIT does not have a separate crystal
Talk:Black gold

message: It can also mean gold of black colour,used for jewelry.--83.92.72.18 22:19, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Jewelry

message: I'm going to add Coffee to the commodity, as per the film.  Let me know if you disagree Jonpatterns (talk) 10:12, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Coffee
Talk:Strange B meson

message: I think Strange B mesons would be a better name for this page.Headbomb (talk) 01:43, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename

message: Recent changes were badly worded, the layout was crappy and it was obviously in the wrong section. I have no problem with changes to the page, but please make good changes, not bad ones. Feel free to reapply the changes once you make sure they are coherent, easy to read, comply with Wikipedia:Manual of Style and put them in the right section.     — <TT style="text-shadow:#80FF80 0.1em 0.1em 0.2em; color:#008000;">SkyLined</TT> (talk) 16:15, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It would also need an decent source. The analogies there were ... not so great. - 2/0 (cont.) 04:37, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent changes 

message: The link to box diagram leads to a page called Neutral Particle Oscillation which doesn't even mention box diagrams.  I don't know why it goes to that article, perhaps it USED to have a section about box diagrams, or perhaps there is some other connection that I don't understand, but it seems either broken, or at the very least not well explained.  Am I missing something? DJsunkid (talk) 08:23, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Box Diagram? 

message: I'm do not agree with the premise that this article is too complicated for most readers.  I believe that the topic itself is too complicated for most readers.  It would be possible, but not desirable, to remove all the mathematics and make this yet another National Enquirer grade piece of fluff.  The subject itself is complex, and anyone who is visiting Wikipedia and looking at "Strange Bs Meson" pretty well has to believe that the topic will be complicated.
Perhaps the approach should be to add a paragraph at the beginning that explains that the article covers a complicated topic in complicated detail.  The math -is- the topic, and complex or not, it should stay. Norm Reitzel (talk) 08:52, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  It '''is''' Complicated
Talk:Beam dump

message: Having a hard time visualizing some of the tools discussed here. Obviously I can go use a search engine and look - but it would be nice to have some example pics here. Further discussion of and/or pictures of the beam dumps at the LHC would nice too. 24.70.112.204 (talk) 00:05, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures? 

message: Where can I read more about the beam dump at the Large Hadron Collider? Morecromulent (talk) 05:25, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  LHC Beam Dump Design?
Talk:Sidney Torch

message: Nothing about The Queen's Hall Light Orchestra? Gwaka Lumpa 22:24, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, you're more than welcome to add something about them. Rob 19:10, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

text: Ah, I think there might have been confusion here. You're right, it was Ashworth Hope. I think Sidney Torch perhaps conducted the original performance, rather than composed it. Thanks for the correction. Rob 13:51, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Pool Guy

message: Is there a connection of any kind between the seinfeld episode "The Pool Guy" and the motion picture "Cable Guy"? In neither of the articels I could find a reference to the other. If this is a coincidence, it's a VERY big one, considering the parallels in the title, the plot and the look of the pool guy who really resembles Jim Carrey. With his jacket he looks like Jim Carey in "Dumb and Dumber". I already checked the "Behind the Scenes" stuff on the Seinfeld Season 7 DVD and the adio commentary, that says it is based on a real story of a guy at the health club being just "too friendly". 
However there are a few facts against that theory. As mentioned in "Behind the Scenes", at first the pool guy character should have been played by another actor (Danny Hoch) featurung a Latino accent and who most problably didn't look like Jim Carey. The most peculiar thing though is, that Cable Guy was released in June of 1996 and the TV episode was produced spring the same year. So there isn't really a time window to sneak a peak on each other. That may be more true for the motion picture, which takes more time. On the other hand, inside information from that movie would have been necessery to produce an episode imitating it.
:I just watched the film and was reminded of this episode. According to IMDb the episode aired on November 16th 1995, and The Cable Guy started shooting on November 27th. So it's conceivable that the filmmakers saw the episode immediately prior to filming and were somewhat influenced by it, and maybe Jim Carrey drew on Carlos Jacott's performance. Possible, if unlikely. It's also possible that the film script was circulating for a while and that someone attached to the show had come in contact with it, though the central idea of rebuffing a wannabe friend isn't so unusual that it couldn't be a coincidence. The resemblance of Jacott to Carrey, on top of all that, must just be a huge coincidence though. Wetdogmeat (talk) 04:14, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It's possible the writers got the idea from the trailer of The Cable Guy, which gives most of the plot away. Also the film was directed by Ben Stiller -- the son of Jerry Stiller who played Frank Constanza on Seinfeld. MrEricSir (talk) 05:11, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: As already mentioned, the episode aired before The Cable Guy even started filming, so I don't know how you imagine the Seinfeld writers could have gotten the idea from the film's trailer unless you think they could see into the future. (And if they could, surely they could find a more profitable way of using that power than ripping off a so-so movie that had a middling performance at the box office?) Martin IIIa (talk) 15:49, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Pool Guy vs. Cable Guy

message: I know he only had a brief scene, but still. Macshill (talk) 07:52, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Alec Mapa inclusion in guest stars?
Talk:Bethe lattice

message: After the first paragraph in the introductory section, this sentence appears:
"(Note that the Bethe lattice is actually an unrooted tree, since any vertex will serve equally well as a root.) "
Although it is true that any vertex will serve equally as a root, that is not the reason that the Bethe lattice is an unrooted tree.
The reason that it is an unrooted tree is that it is defined to be an unrooted tree.
I hope someone knowledgeable about the subject will fix this error. 2601:200:C000:1A0:21A7:B740:95E6:BA8D (talk) 20:41, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mistake
Talk:Bifilar coil

message: These things date back to at least 1851, maybe earlier, so it was not invented by Tesla as implied in this article. rm'ed history section and non-related patents. Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 19:46, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inventor? 

message: Google seems to pick up strongly on the "bifilar winding" bit.Seems to short circuit any helpful search to "Rodin - windings, coils, theory or anything else" - so it's not all that useful, whether the idea is scientific gibberish or not.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.242.247.177 (talk) 06:08, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why "Rodin Coil" directed here from Google
Talk:Survivor Series (2002)

message: May it be added in the trivia section that all titles defended at Survivor Series 2002 ALL changed hands —Preceding unsigned comment added by Deadman lastride666 (talk • contribs) 
Dude, they probably wont...sorry. Not to be rude or anything, just saying...--Lord Dagon (talk) 13:53, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title changes  

message: I'm fixing the "Release order" for the Elimination Chamber. The current listing has RVD and Triple H 1 and 2, respectively, when they should be 5 and 6. Furthermore, The actual release order was Chris Jericho, Booker T, Kane, Shawn Michaels, not what's listed. Cougar Draven 00:29, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, you are wrong. Triple H and Van Dam started the match (with RVD causing HHH to bleed within the first 3 minutes of the match), hence they are listed at 1 and 2. I added a link that goes into detail on the match, including the release order. TJ Spyke 00:42, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elimination Chamber 

message: This will go out of order. Sorry for any inconveniences.
===Event===
#Double Flapjack on him --> who is "him"
#Combine the last two sentences of the second paragraph.
#What did she do with the mirror and fire extinguisher?
#Show would however grab a steel chair, hit Lesnar in the ribs, and chokeslam Lesnar onto it and pinning Lesnar. Remove "and pinning Lesnar" and combine it with the last sentence of that paragraph.
#between the team of team ---> teams
#Booker T would be the next elimination ---> Booker T would be the next eliminated
#Fix that again for Jericho's elimination
===Aftermath===
#Wiki-link all of the dates.
#:–LAX 16:48, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  pre-GA review 

message: #Wiki-link all of the dates.
#:–LAX 16:48, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Aftermath

message: #The match notes need to be sourced.
Let me know when you're done. iMatthew 2008 15:49, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Results
Talk:Paolo Pandolfo

message: Hey Dadio, lets talk here. Ok, so you want:
(1) A reference to his original compositions in the article.
His CD's are the proof. Travel notes for instance. His web site home page states it as well.
 scroll down.
(2) The date he co-founded Labyrinto. 
If it's important the info can be had.
(3) Citation for "the patrimony of ancient music" bit. 
That's on his web site, see the last sentance of the English blurb. 
What was wrong with calling  August Wenzinger and Jordi Savall "Maestros" -- they are or were.  By extension it was also meant to imply that Paolo _is_ also a Maestro, a Master, because he is. 
*It just came across as POV because of the conventional use of the word in English.  Perhaps "virtuosos" would work?  Badagnani 22:58, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Alrighty Cyclocifra 23:10, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Okee dokee Cyclocifra 23:10, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Misc. details 12-03-06