Talk:Abd al-Rahman III

message: After checking at the huge backlog of NPOV disputes, I believe that just marking something NPOV doesn't mean it will be fixed. Therefore, I have taken the liberty of deleting the counterverisal passages which expressed the opinions of the writer. The main article is still intact. So, the NPOV dispute is off.
However, just because they are the opinions of the writer doesn't mean they are wrong (however, I do.) It does need to be adressed in a differnet enivorment however, like in a debate.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.72.97.47 (talk • contribs) 02:04, 11 October 2004
*This article was written by the 1911 Edition of the Encyclopaedia Britiannica.  Its views are very British-centric and have a very strong POV, so don't be afraid to change some stuff here.  Still, there aren't too many original source materials for articles of this nature, which is partially why this hasn't been edited that much.  --Robert Horning 17:16, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV removal 

message: Hey boys, I've just expanded this article to a decent status, using the Spanish article (which in some points looks however confused) and a book by Schreiber (also shallow in many points) as my sources. Can anyone help and check my English, as I am not mothertongue? Ciao and good work. --Attilios (talk) 10:05, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion

message: The "Life" section refers to "Abdullah, seventh independent Umayyad emir of Al-Andalus", and to "Emir Abdallah". It appears that these are the same person. But then it says "Emir Abdallah died heirless at seventy-two." But we know that emir Abdullah was the grandfather of the subject of this article, and therefore had at least one heir. Also, the article on Abdallah ibn Muhammad says that he lived from 844 - 912, so he died before he was 70.
Can someone clarify this, and remove any inconsistencies? Maproom (talk) 21:08, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion 

message: In the section "Legacy" there is an adjusted paragraph with a first person narrator that looks like it should be some sort of citation. However, it is neither marked as such nor is a source given. Please correct this. --79.249.123.228 (talk) 17:53, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation without source 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Abd-ar-Rahman III. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080217165547/http://www.allaboutphilosophy.org:80/abd-ar-rahman-iii.htm to http://www.allaboutphilosophy.org/abd-ar-rahman-iii.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:53, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I am ambivalent about whether we use the transliteration of the name or its phonetic representation as before, but we need to be consistent - if the page is going to be Abd al-Rahman, then it should use Abd al-Rahman throughout, rather than Abd al-Rahman for the namespace then Abd ar-Rahman in the text (and the same also goes for ar-Rabdi and ad-Dakhil in his full name, and at-Tugib part way down the page). Agricolae (talk) 04:46, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  al-Rahman vs ar-Rahman 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:36, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion 

message: Please see the discussion at Talk:Abd al-Rahman I#Image not really Abd al-Rahman I ? , where there is an issue over an image attributed both to Abd Al-Rahman I and Abd al-Rahman III. Agricolae (talk) 15:46, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image issue on another page 

message: I restored a large chunk of text concerning the affair of Pelagius of Cordoba. This was removed by a non registered editor without justification. However I am surprised that no other editor thought to take action before now to address this. Can people be more vigilant please. Contaldo80 (talk) 20:31, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pelagius of Cordoba