Talk:Lawrence Franklin espionage scandal

message: Content moved from Talk:Larry Franklin. --Uncle Bungle 00:21, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Move it to the person's name when it's known. 24.123.221.2 01:05, 28 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: the word "allegation" should also figure in the title until a conviction, admission or general consensus. - pir 13:51, 28 Aug 2004 (UTC)

text: Indeed. The Mossad mole was busy burrowing in Governor Jim McGreevey's bed. - Jack Spade 17:07, 28 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Why Jim McGreevey? Why would an intelligence agency ever bother with the Governor of New Jersey? No, somehow that makes no sense. --Penta 02:49, 10 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Some people would blame Mossad for the weather being bad if they could. Even stubbing their toes becomes a Mossad conspiracy :P Impi 22:54, 10 Sep 2004 (UTC)

text: Some of them work at the FBI's counterintelligence desk. A nest of Israel-haters. [[PaulinSaudi 10:35, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: 2004 article name discussion

message: This is getting too unwieldy and about a lot more than Franklin. Shouldn't much of the scandal story be spun off into its own article? Any suggestions for what to call it?Daniel Case 03:34, 6 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Separate article about investigation

message: Isnt this all about Franklin? Besides that, Israel and AIPAC have strongly denied any involvement in espionage activities against the United States. Thus the article is POV and infers one side, especially considering the title is used by several anti-Israel sources. The title should be changed.
I accidentally tripped across this story. I watch the news fairly regularly, it probably was touched on by the major media but their enthusiasm for the story has certainly been muted. Any reason/s for the, not blackout, grayout of the story?159.105.80.141 12:27, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: I removed a lot of material from this page that seemed to be irrelevant. I also took out the entire last section, which came from a single think tank. I haven't heard of it before, but a cursory look at their website seems to indicate that it is not a reliable source. However, there are valid 1st Ammendment concerns related to this case. I don't have time right now, but we could use a couple of paragraphs on that topic.  Dchall1 18:43, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: The article name and lead are misleading. Larry Franklin passed information to AIPAC officials and was prosecuted for that. However the AIPAC passed information to foreign country, making this an espionage case. So the correct name for the article is AIPAC espionage scandal (or case, or incident?). Maybe even more important is that in media it is mainly mentioned as "AIPAC case", "AIPAC trial", etc.  --Magabund 21:06, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: AIPAC espionage scandal

message: Should this issue be known as an "espionage" scandal when Franklin was ultimately charged with unauthorized disclosure of classified information, NOT with espionage?ShamWow (talk) 04:54, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I will let the lawyer-types argue that one, but it also may be more correct to add the term 'conviction'. CasualObserver'48 (talk) 06:22, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: New name for page?

message: The article refers to a "Rosen" a couple of times without mentioning who that is. Rōnin (talk) 15:37, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Who's "Rosen"?

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Lawrence Franklin espionage scandal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20050406030436/http://msnbc.msn.com:80/id/5853706/site/newsweek to http://msnbc.msn.com/id/5853706/site/newsweek/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:04, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Lawrence Franklin espionage scandal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040831001421/http://www.reuters.co.uk/newsPackageArticle.jhtml?type=worldNews&storyID=573326§ion=news to http://www.reuters.co.uk/newsPackageArticle.jhtml?type=worldNews&storyID=573326§ion=news
*Added  tag to http://www.seattlepi.com/national/1107ap_ml_israel_us_spy_probe.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:57, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Excuse my ignorance, but what is "powerful case-management software"? 86.132.222.1 (talk) 22:05, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Powerful case-management software?