lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Gene mapping

message: We should change the title of this article to genome mapping to be correct. How can we do that?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Knownothing25 (talk • contribs) 03:47, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: This page really needs some attention! One thing that should be there is a section (or even a new page?) on clone maps.  describes this nicely but technically, could be a good ref. Akita86 (talk) 19:40, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: New section or page

message: I have removed the templates proposing to merge gene map into this article.  They have been there for a year and even the proposer has not bothered to make a case for the merge, or even opened a discussion.  According to gene map it is the map of the regions of an individual gene.  This is a different subject to this article which defines itself as mapping gene positions on a chromosome. SpinningSpark 18:53, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: I propose Gene map be merged to this article (Gene mapping) since they seem to talk about very much the same topic: Physical and genetic mapping, and even their utilization in detecting disease genes. Though they are not exactly the same, the gene map article talks more about methods of mapping genes rather than gene maps. Moreover, the product of gene mapping would naturally be a gene map. --H2NCH2COOH (Talk) 06:54, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Alternative solution: I guess the article gene map probably needs an overhaul if the two articles should not be merged. The article genetic linkage mentions that "A linkage map is not a physical map (such as a radiation reduced hybrid map) or gene map" without giving any citation. But neither has gene map given any useful citation (the references don't explicitly mention "gene map") proving that a linkage map can be called a "gene map" either (despite giving the two approaches, one of which is about linkage analysis). So either the statement in genetic linkage is wrong or gene map is wrong by covering too many things that do not belong in its topic (but probably belong in gene mapping, thus requiring either a merger or an overhaul of gene map). I am not professional so I cannot decide which one is correct. --H2NCH2COOH (Talk) 08:02, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

text: Klbrain (talk) 11:11, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Want

message: И сопли могут полететь !! ))) 
" Крысочка моя..
Я люблю тебя..
Хрумхрумхрумхрум..
Хрууу.. ммм.. ) 
.. 176.59.209.55 (talk) 05:07, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Если очень захотеть ..  

message: I want the meaning of WANT 41.116.15.4 (talk) 15:48, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: need 41.115.58.13 (talk) 18:48, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  English 

message: Manufuring
Community
Promissory note
Secondary 
     
       Question 2 
A need is something we must have in order to live
Example: food( primary) or contact with other people(secondary).
A want is something we would  like to do have but that we could live with out for.
Example:designer jeans.
3.2 Tribal system, self sufficient,few possessions, simple standard of living consumer and produce to satisfy basic need, transport by human or animal  energy, use system  of bartering. 41.116.15.4 (talk) 16:03, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  EMS
Talk:Crisco

message: So there was a bar around the corner called "The White Horse" that closed in the 1980s. Should I create a link to it in the Wikipedia artilcles on horses, and the color white? No, of course not.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kyle kursk (talk • contribs) 17:22, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crisco Disco link removed 

message: example: Crisco candles & table top heaters ==> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xnNHM4OLkvE
okay to add? or if not why not?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Howard from NYC (talk • contribs) 10:34, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Q: policy about adding content about emergency uses?
Talk:Changuito

message: Are you sure he should be characterized Jazz musician? 84.59.84.106 00:53, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Patrick Harvie

message: There is not one citation in this biography, this should be looked into.
Stevenscollege 14:54, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Prob cos he wrote it himself... GiollaUidir 15:30, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

text: If you muppets can actually challenge it, then I'm interested! --Jamesmackenzie 00:15, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: Is his religion relevent at all here? Given that the main reason he has an article is being the leader of a political party with a clear environmental agenda. --Connelly90[AlbaGuBràth] (talk) 11:50, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Religion 

message: There is an RfC on the question of using "Religion: None" vs. "Religion: None (atheist)" in the infobox on this and other similar pages. 
The RfC is at Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion. 
Please help us determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 10:05, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:   [[Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion|Request for Comments]]
Talk:National Advanced Youth Leader Experience

message: NAYLE is basically cutting into the leadership training programs across the country. 
A lot of very inappropriate things happened that took away the NAYLE program. Most of it involved deception for a get rich soon campaign by leadership at PTC. But that is besides the point our NYLT programs are going down the tube. Our troop leadership is reflecting the poor training skills of staff members at local NYLT's. In the southern region the region level NJLIC program has been blocked. 
Please contact Philmont Scout Ranch on facebook to join a task force that is working on getting NJLIC back to Philmont. Guys we need your help!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.150.209.15 (talk) 03:53, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need for NJLIC
Category talk:American legal scholars

message: Should this be under "American lawyers", and some of the existing categories be removed? PatGallacher 01:04, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Though most are, not all law professors are actually lawyers; I had one who never took the bar or had a client but instead remained in academia her whole career...  "Jurist" is the proper umbrella term for all legal professionals.  What "existing categories" should be removed, and why?  Postdlf 03:13, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Eumetazoa

message: I removed the mention of organs formed by germ layers, because as I understand it, only those animals with three germ layers (triploblasts) have true organs.
Cephal-odd 04:55, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Characteristics of Eumetazoa 

message: A wikipedian confused the terms Metazoa and Eumetazoa, and created a page for Metazoa describing the taxon Eumetazoa.  Here is the information that was found on that page, if there is anything here that is not currently on this page, by all means use it.
*Metazoa usually refers to the animals with numerous cells which are arranged in layers or groups resulting in the formation of organs, fully differentiated tissues, including nerves and muscles. Different cells here can follow different lines of specialization to perform various functions. Characteristic of metazoa is the process of embryonic development by which the fertilized egg passes through a series of changes culminating in the formation of the adult. This includes all the animal phyla except the sponges, Trichoplax, and certain parasites. In older texts, Metazoa is often taken to be synonymous with our Animalia, excluding only the protozoa. It may be formalized as a subkingdom, but its treatment varies considerably. Metazoa are distinguished from other Animalia in that they can perform apoptosis. This is a biological recognition that cell differentation is essential to these organisms.
Werothegreat 17:41, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Metazoa redirect to Animal

message: The Phylum Placozoa is not part of the Subkingdom Eumetazoa. It is actually part of the Subkingdom Parazoa alongside the Phylum Porifera (true sponges). Members of the Phylum Placozoa are not sponges, in other words, but they do share a Subkingdom with sponges, not with us. The Mysterious El Willstro (talk) 02:58, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing Phylum Placozoa 
Talk:HoJo

message: Some may argue that this should have been disamb'd from the Howard Johnson's article as an OtherUse, but in the singular form, the nickname is just as (or more) likely to refer to the person as the hotel, which is normally referred to as HoJo's in the possessive form. Autiger 01:11, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Disamb
Talk:Predicative (adjectival or nominal)

message: I've taken the liberty of changing the "predicative" link in the first paragraph. Previously it linked to a disambiguation page, it now directly goes to the appropriate Predicative (grammar) page. 143.167.77.152 (talk) 12:17, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  link 

message: Please add references and if your using common knowledge put it in the references area.Defector1234 (talk) 22:13, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Canadian Voltigeurs

message: the osprey book and most other sources I've seen indicate that the Canadian Voltigieurs carried India Pattern Muskets, rather then "tower pattern Muskets"Mike McGregor (Can) 01:17, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll check, but I believe the two patterns were essentially the same; the only difference being that the East India pattern were originally contracted for by the East India company, the Tower pattern were a further production run for the British Army. My source for the Voltigeur's arms were the web sites listed in the article. (A "New Land Service Musket" was used by British light infantry units, this doesn't seem to have found its way to the Americas, except in the hands of units like the 90th Foot.) HLGallon 02:09, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Muskets

message: First to note that there's not even a Voltigeur disambiguation page, but also to req someone from MILHIST to write British Columbia Voltigeurs, which was a colonial-era unit created by Governor Douglas.Skookum1 (talk) 16:53, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[British Columbia Voltigeurs]]
Talk:Overseas Filipino Worker

message: Should we not combine this page with the overseas Filipino page they appear to duplicate each other substantially.  It might be best if both search terms are directed to a single page (im not sure how to do this) Nickhk 01:30, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal

message: President Rodrigo R. Duterte calls the Senate President Vicente Sotto III & House Speaker Lord Velasco that Senate Bill 1949 as Certified Urgent. King Chopazar Belimac (talk) 07:28, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Department of Overseas Filipinos Senate Bill 1949 by Senator Christopher Lawrence "Bong" Go 

message: Hi , you recently reverted some edits on this page, and you explained that you were reverting edits by an IP vandal. Can you please clarify why you made this revert? Thank you. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 04:19, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The IP has been involved in several vandal edits as seen here, here, here, here and here. The edits they have added here may be also hoax. -WayKurat (talk) 05:29, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit revert 

message: In the introductory sentence it says there are over 10 million filipino workers abroad. But then in the infobox on the right it says 2.3 million. I dont know if those are contradictory or refer to differently conducted statistics, to me its definitely confusing. Can someone correct/clarify these numbers?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samaraner (talk • contribs) 11:19, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the sentence in the lead. "A qualitative study of Filipina immigrants’ stress, distress and coping: the impact of their multiple, transnational roles as women" was cited as the source but at least its summary says "The Philippines is one of the biggest export countries of labour, with over 10 million Filipinos working or living abroad" (which in turn was sourced from the Migration Policy Institute). However the figure seems to include the more general Filipino diaspora who decided to settle abroad long term. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 02:52, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of people
Talk:Rascal (book)

message: I find it odd that the canoe paddle warrants it's own section. At any rate, the paddle is now at the Sterling North Museum anyway, so I'm going to delete that section. 
(talk) 22:48, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: The Canoe Paddle

message: Was there a reference for this review?  Also, is it copyrighted?  If there is a reference and justification for using copyrighted material, then please add it back.  The content of the review does seem reasonable.  Thanks, Brholden (talk) 17:20, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: AJR Review?

message: This article states in its very beginning that Rascal "is a prose poem to adolescent angst". Angst? The book is not about angst, it is about a wonderful world of animals and wilderness. I can agree that the child Sterling probably created this world for himself to flee into, since he needed it. The adult readers sees things in the book that the kid will probably not see, such as the father being pretty negligant. The loss of his mother is mentioned, but it is not a major theme. We could mention Sterling's family situation, but that is not the main theme of the book and should not be the first section of the plot summary. // habj (talk) 10:46, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The whole thing sounds like it was lifted from a third party. It's not very encyclopedic.PurpleChez (talk) 21:09, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Angst? 

message: Jessica North's reaction isn't relevant to the plot summary.  Apart from that, what citations are needed for that section?  Surely the book itself is the only "citation" needed for the plot..? BunsenH (talk) 01:06, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot summary citations needed? 

message: It's a great book and i hope u will read it!!!!!!! :]  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.75.37.20 (talk) 17:26, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  It's a Great Book!
Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Randallrobinstine

message: Well, please don't take offence, Randall, but I think he might be autistic. The poor writing skills, resistance to change, fixation on one subject (Radio stations). It all fits.
--Neobubblegirl 01:34, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I had suspected that.  However, this topic may be moot now, because after another rash of odd edits, an admin proceeded to place an indefinite block on Randall.  --KHill-LTown 01:57, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:CBS News Mornings

message: There IS currently a program called CBS Morning News which airs at 4:30AM ET.  This article should probably talk about the current program, not past programs.
I agree, there should not be information regarding past programs on this page, the Early Show page, or CBS This Morning's page. There should be an article titled "History of CBS Morning Programs" 71.60.76.241 (talk) 14:14, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

message: Most, if not all of this article, is taken word for word from the book What Were They Thinking?: The 100 Dumbest Events In Television History by David Hofstede; see pgs. 122-124 of this title for the cited article. - Mrschimpf 06:28, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed the infringing material. – Quadell (talk) (bounties) 21:24, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright violation

message: I would like more detail to be added to the text "For most of the 1960s and 1970s the broadcast aired as a 60 minute hard news broadcast at 7 a.m., opposite Today on NBC and preceding Captain Kangaroo on CBS."
I would like to know who the broadcasters were during the "60-minute hard news broadcast" that aired for most of the 1960s and 1970s. This bears relevance as to which newscasters covered the Vietnam War. Can someone add this to the page? Missyagogo (talk) 05:53, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  CBS Morning News and its role in the Vietnam Era
Talk:Liberalism in South Africa

message: The def implied by the first paragraph is simply those parties that secured a representative and called themselves "liberal"? Is this true? Wouldn't it be better to have at least a vague mention of what being liberal in So Af meant? For example, did  most "liberal" parties oppose apartheid? Did they have a major involvement in labor politics? Did they try to extend voting rights in some way? Did they have a predictable stance toward world affairs (e.g. the Cold War)? Were there perceptible British vs Boer factions and were the liberals more identified with one than the other. How about a sentence such as, Liberal parties were generally distinguished by mild-to-strong opposition to apartheid, support for labor interests during conflict, support for international liberation movements against colonialist or American-allied interests... Note that I know nothing about So Af politics, so maybe none of these points are distinctive or relevant, but those of you who wrote this should be able to come up with something better as a lead paragraph. The current one is both ungrammatical and uninformative. Dalembert 01:41, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed!  And it seems it's been that way since you commented at the start of 2006. — Gk sa (talk) 22:21, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: needs better definition of liberal
Talk:Chris Okotie

message: I have put up a new page with original content.
--Woodyteegra 01:45, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Masashi Kishimoto

message: I found this over the internet. This contains quite interesting facts about him. Please check if it can be used to improve the article. AbhiMukh97(Speak)(Contribs) 14:35, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: It might be true, but I don't think this can count as a reliable source. Better ask in the project how we should handle this.Tintor2 (talk) 16:38, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding an interview of Kishimoto 

message: Why is there no image for the infobox?
MrRushh (talk) 00:39, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image for Infobox
Talk:Tribotester

message: The title of this page is tribolister but the text refers to tribotester. Which one is right? Are they both right? Brighterorange 01:48, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: yes they're both right, as is tribometer, the more common name, which is where i've consolidated the info to. Spute 21:49, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Monster (Peretti novel)

message: The author has strayed into mainstream horror with religious elements. I would have to disagree. The "mainstream horror" present in this novel is a lot less intense and horrifying than novels by authors such as Stephen King. Scorpionman 01:52, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right, of course. It's not as weird as IT either. But the word "strayed" should be removed; Frank Peretti has not "strayed" into mainstream horror, he has written books such as these purposefully to display the faultiness of evolution. But man, I sure loved this book, and I want a lot more monster stories from Frank Peretti! Scorpionman 03:04, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Author

message: The question has been raised by Teenwriter as to why the interview section has been removed from the article.  The answer is simply to conform to better Wiki standards in an attempt to clean up the article as requested.  The article, which is still available via a link in the External links section, is not necessary and strays away from the format of other Peretti title articles.
Aside from the question of being necessary or relevant, re-adding the material completely borked the layout of the page. - Cybjorg 10:42, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean up

message: I removed the statement that this is Peretti's first science fiction novel.  Certainly Hangman's Curse and The Nightmare Academy could be classified as science fiction. Waluigi Freak 99 23:39, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  First Sci-Fi Novel?  I Beg to Differ 

message: I was reluctant to remove that review, but did so because it came from a non-notable publication and a non-notable reviewer. It appears the only reason it was in here was to provide some hint that somebody liked the book. --Orange Mike  |  Talk 16:57, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing the one favorable review
Talk:Team Love Records

message: Does anyone know if we can redirect this page to Team Love Records for the point of being accurate?
*Done. – Freechild (BoomCha) 00:23, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Dann Gallucci

message: Could he be related to Don Gallucci from the Kingsmen?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Happymeal33 (talk • contribs) 16:05, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Don Gallucci 
Talk:Melbourne tram route 78

message: I'm working on this page as part of my Wikipedia:WikiProject_Melbourne contributition. Feel free to tell me about anything ive done wrong :/ Ssmessenger 02:26, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In table "universit" = "university".2605:E000:9149:8300:24F6:F1F3:54B9:8247 (talk) 03:34, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed at Template:Route 78 tram. Thanks for pointing out the error. I can understand why you may not have been able to find where to fix this typo on the page, since the map comes from a template. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 06:51, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  universit = university
Talk:Melbourne tram route 79

message: I'm working on this page as part of my Wikipedia:WikiProject_Melbourne contributition. Feel free to tell me about anything ive done wrong :/ Ssmessenger 02:27, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lake Chalco

message: The following two sentences were removed from the original essay:
"An oddity about this lake is that during the long development time of the ancient mesoamerican civilization, the island called Cuitlahuac was the home site of a culture that no other people could dominate until the island was communicated with land through a street. This street greatly affected the hydrological and ecological stability of the Mexican Basin." 
(Reason removed: unattributed and I could find no support. Madman 02:25, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Area codes 305, 786, and 645

message: I'm not doing anything but making it look like all the other area code articles.  In every other NANP area code article, the N/S/E/W boxes only have the numbers, not the locations of those numbers.  See Area code 954 and Area code 561.  Even before I touched them, they only said "242", not "242 in the Bahamas".  Zurqoxn (talk) 20:23, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This article has had "242 in the Bahamas" since December 2005. Your changing "in the Bahamas" to "Atlantic Ocean" in this article, and adding "Atlantic Ocean" to the other articles, is in error. Area code 242 is assigned to the Bahamas, not to the Atlantic Ocean. The Atlantic Ocean does not have an area code. I have to conclude that your assigning "Atlantic Ocean" to Area Code 242 is original research. Please stop violating this policy. -- Donald Albury 20:55, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I see where the confusion is coming from.  I'm not saying the ocean has an area code, I'm saying it's east of 305/786.  I think that every area code that borders an ocean should say so in the box, and have been adding the oceans to the boxes that don't have them yet, that's all.  Zurqoxn (talk) 13:20, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Please don't. I fund that very confusing. -- Donald Albury 21:40, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Area code nav-box 

message: I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: when this rolls out in August, consider renaming to this
AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 23:39, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Feedback from New Page Review process