lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Wayne Cooper (fashion designer)

message: This article is one of a  number selected for the early stage of the trial of the Wikipedia:Pending Changes system on the English language Wikipedia. All the articles listed at Wikipedia:Pending changes/Queue   are being considered for level 1 pending changes protection.
The following request appears on that page:
Comments on the suitability of theis page for "Pending changes"  would be appreciated.
Please update the Queue page as appropriate.
Note that I am not involved in this project any much more than any other editor, just posting these notes since it is quite a big change, potentially
Regards, Rich Farmbrough, 00:37, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Pending changes

message: Hello please can I request that you delete the tobacco reference and the abuse reference as Wayne Cooper was found not guilty recently and his ex wife has been extremely difficult the judge in fact ruled that there were inconsistencies in her story 
In 2008 he pleaded guilty as his barrister said it would be easier and would save his business and he regrets this. I am now married to Wayne and he is a wonderful man and father and the proof is there in that the latest trial that he went to the judge saw the truth and so he was cleared of all charges and the AVO and he obviously regrets the first decision to not go to trial only to have sacked his barrister and subsequently his business thrived.
please can you add the latest articles 
https://www.realestate.com.au/news/fashion-guru-wayne-cooper-buys-own-home-at-auction/
https://www.canberratimes.com.au/story/8305020/designer-wayne-cooper-not-guilty-of-assaulting-ex-wife/
https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/entertainment/sydney-confidential/fashion-designer-wayne-coopers-wedding-imminent/news-story/b212a030ffe1a3add79b30a3d24dffcf
https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/entertainment/fashion-designer-wayne-cooper-and-elizabeth-adams-tie-the-knot/news-story/a4e7092571019085aaae0bb9b72cd91b Adamselizabeth77 (talk) 19:00, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Deltaspace42 (talk • contribs) 19:29, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 19 December 2023
Talk:Slavín

message: In 1983, while still behind the Iron Curtain, the official guided tour of Bratislava conducted as part of a hydrofoil day trip from Vienna spent the most time here at Slavín. In contrast, the visit to Bratislava Castle hill lasted 5 minutes during which we were told that the Castle itself, which we did not enter, was not interesting because it was only a reconstruction. Varlaam (talk) 23:38, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official tour stop
Talk:Carefree (chant)

message: Any sources as to the melody's origins? The Gnome (talk) 12:40, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Melody

message: A user is trying to insert a "parody" section, which contains "alternative" lyrics with (explicit) content, obviously sung by opponents in "response" to the Carefree song. This is a practice which, if extended to similar entries, would clutter wikipedia with "responses" and "retorts", posted by competing groups of soccer fans. Opinions are invited. -The Gnome (talk) 11:03, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Clearly any discussion of a topic related to football teams quickly leads to passionate argument that is unrelated to the matter that started it.  The usual norms of verifiability surely apply.  If there is a reliable source for the alternate lyrics then they should probably be included.  I don't believe content is "screened" based on it having explicit content, i.e. this is OK in Wikipedia as long as it is not gratuitous (can't find a reference for that). Rich257 (talk) 11:14, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: "Explicitness" is irrelevant. (Wikipedia is ...explicit about that!) The point is  that there is simply no end to "alternate" lyrics of well-known, popular songs. Therefore, aside from verifiability, the criterion of notability should be applied. Otherwise, every entry risks of being inundated with pseudo-parodies. The parody of Al Yankovic, for example, merits a separate and thorough inclusion in Wikipedia, because it is often equally or more famous than the original. But this is clearly not the case with parodies of ..football songs. -The Gnome (talk) 12:25, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If the parody has a reliable source and can be verified, it can be added, however, I feel that adding the lyrics is redundant, because the article is about the Carefree (chant) and not the opposition chant. 1-2 sentences explaining the opposing chant can be added, but a whole section devoted to the opposition chant is not necessary. Also, yes Wikipedia can have explicit content per WP:PROF, though as stated above, the lyrics shouldn't be added as it is just a chant made up by aggravated fans in response to this chant, which to me seems a bit trivial to add to the article.--SRX--LatinoHeat 13:40, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "Parody"
Wikipedia talk:Image copyright help desk/Archive 2

message: I'm proposing an additional category in the :Template:Editabuselinks to reduce the number of posts at WP:AN and WP:AN/I, please feel free to comment here User:Mbisanz/TemplateSandbox. MBisanz talk 13:15, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed template change

message: Per  BC has created basically an NFCC-checker tool that looks very promising and should be easy enough for even a beginner to use (I understand it at least).  Could it be incorporated into this page's header instructions?   MBisanz talk 19:04, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've created a template  to assist its use. Obviously, you can you use the template in an edit preview, and you don't have to save. Addhoc (talk) 19:17, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: New tool

message: We already have WP:MCQ along with several other duplicative copyright questions pages.  This division of efforts is unproductive. Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:54, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: As a suggestion on the ANI notice board and to relieve the load from Betacommand's talk page. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 00:38, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Has the effort been successful? BC's talkpage is still crowded and complaints about the bot continue popping up at AN/I. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 00:29, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  why was this page created? 

message: Please, at some point there should be some agreement about the use of logos. Frequently a "robot" will classify them as "non-free images" and eventually delete them. It is the fourth tme I face such an "attack". I have seen dozens of contributors complain about that, too. A logo is a logo, and once this is specified and fair use is claimed, there should be no problem. Some rare logos are extremely valuable info presented in the Wikipedia, and this process is threatening them altogether.  Skartsis (talk) 16:15, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logos 

message: I've currently tagged this page as being merged with Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, as the two pages are duplicating and splitting effort and I think the main reason they're still separate is that nobody's gotten around to forcing a merge, yet. :) I'll be retargeting shortcuts in a moment, if anybody sees content they'd like to exchange between Wikipedia:Image copyright help desk/Header and Wikipedia:Media copyright questions/Header, that would be grand. – Luna Santin (talk) 00:33, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Completing merge
Talk:Abu ar-Rayhan Muhammad ibn Ahmad al-Biruni

message: There seems to be a dispute about the correct name (spelling) for the subject of this article.  An article on the subject has existed at Abū Rayhān al-Bīrūnī since 2002. This article was created in June 2007, apparently by an editor who was not aware that there was already an article on the subject.  This article — Abu ar-Rayhan Muhammad ibn Ahmad al-Biruni — is a stub (~1700 bytes), whereas the Abū Rayhān al-Bīrūnī article has much more detail (~37,000 bytes).  
Proposal:
*I suggest that any content in this (Abu ar-Rayhan Muhammad ibn Ahmad al-Biruni) article be merged into the longer existing, larger article.  
*Discussion about naming of the article should take place on the larger article's talk page — Talk:Abū Rayhān al-Bīrūnī.  
Caution: Please do not edit war over this article.  Keep in mind that Wikipedia's "Three-revert rule" (3RR policy) does not allow more than 3 reverts in 24 hours. (Please read the 3RR policy for details.
Note: If edit warring continues, I will protect this page.   
— ERcheck (talk) 13:16, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge and consensus name for subject
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject User Page Help/Help Desk

message: I'm proposing an additional category in the :Template:Editabuselinks to reduce the number of posts at WP:AN and WP:AN/I, please feel free to comment here User:Mbisanz/TemplateSandbox. MBisanz talk 13:19, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed template change
Talk:Kings of Sweden family tree

message: #redirectTalk:Pedigree of Swedish monarchs
Removing redirect, these are two separate articles. Charles 13:39, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:SS Mongolia (1922)

message: The url at the first reference (i.e., [1]), which is cited 24 times, connects to a pornographic website.  I'm unsure how to deal with this. I tried, but failed, to find  the "Encyclopedia Peninsular" to which this reference refers. Iammath48 (talk) 06:45, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pornographic link
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Descendants of Gustav II Adolf

message: Suedois, your opinion was not changed. Your two votes were consolidated in their entirety (no words changed) for clarity. Two oppose votes on one page gives the appearance of extra weight when really it is not fair to give the apparent weight of two individual's opinions to one. I was not misrepresenting or removing your opinion and your warning on my talk page is only a continuation of incivility. I will re-consolidate the two passages in their entirety and refer back to this talk page. Charles 13:34, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Note the restorative change I made: . Suedois' opinion was not changed whatsoever as accused, although my comments were removed entirely. Charles 13:38, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

text: United proposal, united comments. The individual opinions of the articles may differ, but please keep the page clear of multiple votes. The comments for each article are easily discerned and the fact that the votes are both oppose (and bolded for convenience) is even more reason to keep the talk page as simple and user friendly as possible. Charles 13:43, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Suedois' two seperate votes
Talk:ʻŌmaʻo

message: Many years ago I lived on the edge of the forest on Oahu below the Pali lookout.  While living there I saw a group of four Omao.  They were all young and probably from the same nest.  They were chalk grey with grey bill and grey legs.  They were very slightly darker on top than on the breast.  They had a black button eye.  They had little fear of me; I walked within six feet of them then walked away.  I only saw them once. 
While living there I also saw a group of five immature olive-drab, crimson honeycreepers.  They saw me without flying away.  I saw an adult of the same at nearby St. Steven’s.  It was not very afraid of me.  I also saw one adult Apapane.  It was terrified of me when it saw me and flew away with great speed.  Years earlier than that, 1976, I saw an adult Iiwi in a clearing at the top of the valley one north of Waikane Valley.  It was scarlet with straw colored legs.  Puoa were common and would come within feet of me at night. 
During the years I lived on Oahu, beneficial nematodes were introduced to the ecology.  They helped to control noxious insects that had preyed upon the fledglings of the more delicate birds.  Many smaller introduced birds were spotted by me at the time that had not lived in the area before as well such as white-eye, red bill leiothrix and very small finches.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by My Flatley (talk • contribs) 04:47, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Sightings

message: The birds don't look alike. How come? FunkMonk (talk) 22:02, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images
Talk:The Jay Bird

message: What company produced the movie, The Jay Bird? Did anyone else, besides me, hear a woman singing my song, "The Jay Bird," seemingly on the Subway radio and/or Subway radio station at the Subway at 23rd and F Streets in Bakersfield, California two days ago on December 22, 2010? Somebody might be hiding one of my assets. Can somebody send me at least one copy (any one or more of the instrumentations) of my sixth grade Fort Thomas Independent Schools Woodfill Elementary School song, "The Jay Bird," that the band director, Mr. Kaiser notated and stenciled onto blue-printed, white paper, which the sixth grade band used to play and sing the same above-described song in a concert for an audience of Woodfill Elementary School parents, teachers, and students at the Woodfill Elementary School cafeteria during our Woodfill Elementary School 1974-75 sixth-grade graduation awards ceremony? By the way, you can change the title of a song or other work of art before you publish it, for instance, in a case in which a song might have been written with a title the same as a movie, such as "The Jay Bird."Oliebeduunerculier 19:59, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: As for your first question, I can answer. It was the Universal Film Manufacturing Company. בוב • تآثر  15:26, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  What company produced the movie, The Jay Bird?
Talk:List of Cardiff City F.C. players

message: The intro doesn't make it clear - are the appearances (& goals) for league matches only, or do they include Cup, European etc (i.e all matches)? From a cursory check it seems the former. As the featured lists include ALL matches, so should the Cardiff City list.  --Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 14:00, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  League matches only? 
Talk:China at the Chess Olympiads

message: This user deleted whole sections from this article.
  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gollenaiven (talk • contribs) 14:57, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That was not intended. The revert was done with WP:TW, which would appear to have had problems in this revert Mayalld (talk) 15:01, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It is apparently a known (if infrequent) bug in TW - see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject User scripts/Scripts/Twinkle/Bugs#TW-B-0013 Mayalld (talk) 15:11, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I would have added the unwarranted deletions back in myself after making that mistake. Gollenaiven (talk) 15:40, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  User:Mayalld
Talk:2008 IIHF World Women's U18 Championship

message: Just wondering what people thought. Should it be left with the links refering to the National Team senior program, or should we create a new template for all of the under 18 teams? Would mean an awful lot of red links to start though.... Carpo1982 (talk) 23:13, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Links
Talk:Japan Post Holdings

message: My understanding is that this holding company is wholly owned by the government. I suggest that type private and "It started with the division and privatization of Japan Post." are misleading without adding this information. The privatisation timetable seems to be 2009 to 2017 . crandles (talk) 14:13, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Ownership of company

message: I know this is a holding company and that most people find that boring, but this is among the ten financially largest companies in the world, and as such I think this article is high importance.  I have rated it as such and classified its content now as making it a stub. If anyone has sources about this organization but no time to wikify content. then please post something on this board.  This article ought not be a stub. Blue Rasberry 15:29, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Importance rating

message: Does Japan use postal codes? ----MountVic127 (talk) 00:31, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Postal codes
Talk:KJIM

message: I found a 1947 advertisement for a station called KJIM: :File:KJIM 1947 newspaper ad.jpg. Is this ad for the right station? The article claims their call letters in 1947 were KTAN, but this ad had the KJIM letters but in the city, on the right frequency, and with the right staff. The Quirky Kitty (talk) 14:44, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Newspaper Ad and original callsign?
Talk:Tk (software)

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Tk and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at  until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 22:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Tk" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: I don't see that this is addressed in the article. Is Tk short for Toolkit or something else or just two random letters with no meaning? 69.161.125.36 (talk) 17:22, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is "Tk" short for Toolkit?
Talk:Lake Bonney SE

message: The article has been renamed to reflect the official name in use since at least 1981 - please refer citation used in the section entitled ‘Naming’.  Regards Cowdy001 (talk) 21:07, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renaming of article 
Talk:P. O. Box 1142

message: : .... 0mtwb9gd5wx (talk) 00:39, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  P. O. Box 1142 - nps.gov/museum/exhibits/FOHU_oral_history/transcripts  

message: A Cincinnati baseball company helped prisoners of war escape during World War II (Aug 9 '22) "Radios inside baseballs, along with playing cards with hidden maps, aided prisoners in communicating with the U.S. It was all a highly classified mission known as P.O. Box 1142, never spoken about publicly until 1990." [etc.] Not sure how to work this into the article. Mapsax (talk) 00:29, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ham radio parts hidden in baseballs
Talk:Charlotte, Rochester, New York

message: * I added  onto "Charlotte was named for Charlotte Augusta, Princess of Wales."  This statement was included on the first version of this page and comes from the epodunk.com entry at http://www.epodunk.com/cgi-bin/genInfo.php?locIndex=63047.  While epodunk says that it uses many credible sources to compile its pages (see about:sources), it doesnt name those sources for any given article.  I've searched a few articles from Rochester History and have not yet been able to find a mention to origin of the name.  The closest I've found is a reference to "Charlottesburg" on page 2 of Barnes, Joseph W. (January 1975). "The Annexation of Charlotte". Rochester History XXXVII (1). Rochester Public Library. ISSN 0035-7413. (http://www.libraryweb.org/~rochhist/v37_1975/v37i1.pdf)
I'll keep looking for more info on this subject and leave the Charlotte Augusta reference on the page for now...  Dspark76 (talk) 14:30, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming of Charlotte
Talk:List of people from Iowa

message: I would like to change the list of names to be    Lastname, First--reason famous--DOB/DOD.  Any objections?--Murdochst (talk) 16:25, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Order of names

message: This article has been identified as containing an excessive quantity of non-free content. Per the Foundation's requirement to keep non-free media use minimal, and per Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria #3, the non-free images on this article have been removed. Please note: 
*The presence of a fair use rationale for this article on an image description page does not make it acceptable for a given use. 
*Blanket restoration of the non-free images that have been removed can and most likely will be reverted, with subsequent reporting action possible. 
*If some restoration is desired, careful consideration of exactly what non-free media to use must be made, paying special attention to WP:NFCC #1 and #8. In most cases non-free media needs to be tied directly to the prose of the article, most preferably with inline citations tying the discussion to secondary sources regarding the image per Wikipedia:Verifiability. 
If this is a list type article, please read the WP:NFLISTS guideline. If you wish to dispute this removal, it may be helpful to read WP:OVERUSE, as it answers a number of typical questions and responses to removals such as this. If after reading these, you still feel there is grounds for restoration of most or all of the media that have been removed, please post to Wikipedia talk:Non-free content.  ΔT The only constant 21:16, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of non-free images on this article 

message: Has anyone from the Iowa project ever considered rearranging the list breaking down people not only alphabetically but by categories indicating what they're most notable for such as Military/politics, athletics, entertainment, etc? For an example of what I mean you can check out List of people from Missouri. Takes a little work, but IMHO it looks nicer and helps the average Wikipedia user tell at a quick glance what a person on the list is famous for. Just something for you folks to consider. Have a great Wiki kinda day! Sector001 (talk) 20:52, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arrangement of names
Talk:Dart River / Te Awa Whakatipu

message: @Somej @HTGS figured this was easier than going back and forth in a borderline edit war, in the hope we can get some sort of agreement here. Personally, in this instance I think it's overkill having all of the names at the top when the dual name is there (mainly because the dual name already has both names in it). Different story altogether when it's something that doesn't have a dual name (such as with the Shotover River having Kimiākau up top), but in this instance they're all there already. Between that and the native name parameter (questionability of that term aside) I think it's a better approach to remove the individual names from the top and just have the dual name there. Thoughts? Turnagra (talk) 08:44, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: hi @Turnagra, @HTGS.  some slightly unstructured thoughts for discussion ... because it's an infobox, I assume it's a bit like wikidata and allows for semi-automated queries. I'd prefer to list all main names in that second row, and drop the "native name" - which is a term that doesn't really make sense in a bilingual country.  So for example, for the Clutha / Mata-au, it makes sense to list all three names that have  been used:  Mata-au, Molyneux, Clutha. And are there maybe other cases where the Maori name is different again from what it is included in an official dual name?       Somej (talk) 09:20, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I think names which aren't covered in the dual name are a different kettle of fish - so with the Clutha / Mata-au, you could include Molyneux (and maybe Matau, as the apparent accurate spelling of Mata-au), but there's no point in listing Clutha and Mata-au there twice as they'd already be covered in the dual name. Turnagra (talk) 18:46, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

text: 👍 — HTGS (talk) 18:28, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I would also be very happy to go to the template talk page to discuss changing “native”. Maybe something like “other languages”? Better to discuss globally of course. — HTGS (talk) 18:31, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah agree that the native name parameter would need to be changed globally, not entirely sure what to though as it's a bit more specific than other languages. Maybe "indigenous" or something, but then I suppose that gets into trouble where the local name isn't really an indigenous one (I'm thinking Europe, mostly). Turnagra (talk) 18:33, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox