lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Port Huron Statement

message: The "Cultural References" section is almost entirely a non-neutral, irrelevent political rant.  This does not belong, and should be removed. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 128.103.191.243 (talk) 18:04, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Has this page been vandalized?  Irrelevant content, non-neutral content 

message: This article needs some work, it seems to be written from a non-neutral point of view, not cite sources, and lack important details. For instance it says "It IS apocalyptic and revolutionary " without citing sources, as well as calling statements from the document "tropes". The article really needs to find some actual historical analysis of the document and cite it. bdodson (talk) 08:58, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality?

message: Vasser24's contributions could not even remotely be characterized as "accurate and balanced assessment", as is claimed. They have also been reverted once before, quite appropriately. Since they are the only substantive edits since 75.179.12.68's (on 3 May 2009), I reverted to that version. Please let me know if there are any problems with this. --kine (talk) 18:47, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "rv excessively biased content" 

message: This is one of the worst articles, relative to its significance, that I've seen on WP.  Selected bits from a very long document, made to look like it's the whole thing, without any kind of analysis or criticism.  It just goes to show the mess that one obsessive editor can create. KarlM (talk) 02:38, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: What a mess

message: seems like prime material for such an activity? Riverbanditry (talk) 10:00, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  scholarly revision?
Talk:Brice Goldsborough

message: Thank you for noticing the article, please email me here through Wikipedia if you see this notice. I tried looking for family, but wasn't succesful. Click on my link: --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 18:03, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Hello
Talk:Janice Nicolich

message: * Why is this article appropriate?  The person described does not appear notable in any way.  Barely two or three sentences in the article even discuss her -- the rest is about the person who caused her death.  --Russ (talk) 19:22, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The article is referenced and the subject, at least her death, seems to have made impact on jurisprudence. Ifnord (talk) 03:05, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :0-7852-6691-7. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 14#0-7852-6691-7 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Hog Farm  Bacon 15:30, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "0-7852-6691-7" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 
Talk:Vaughn (band)

message: This page was voted on for deletion at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Vaughn (Band) on 18 Jan 2005.  The consensus was to keep it.  dbenbenn | talk 00:22, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Origins of the American Civil War/Archive 4

message: I have added the beginnings of articles on Thomas Kettell and Negrophobia as a beginning and reference link for future edits here.Rangerdude 06:42, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Please place new postings toward the bottom of the page. Thanks. 172 07:31, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I suggest using this section to list any progress toward conflict resolution that we make as issues are resolved.Rangerdude 03:23, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Updates & Progress

message: Many of the arguments [User:Rangerdude] makes for tariffs apply with even more force to the question of fugitive slaves, and particularly the enforcement of the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850.  The current article mentions tariffs more than two dozen times, and the fugitive slave issue just seven times. If one reads the various secession documents, debates, editorials, speeches, etc., (not to mention the various compromise efforts advanced by Corwin, Crittenden, etc., and the proposals discussed in the various peace conventions) the count was rather the reverse. For the secessionists, cooperationists, and unionists alike, the fugitive issue got far more attention and discussion than did the tariff issue. At the risk of article bloat, I would suggest a separate sub-section, perhaps under "Divisive Forces" (4.2.4?) where this issue gets full and formal discussion.  Tlbenson 07:40, 16 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I couldn't agree with you more. Unfortunately, the problem here is nowhere near as bad as it is the summary found in a more important article-- American Civil War. (See ) Fixing that article is a higher priority, IMHO. 172 17:06, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Fugitive Slave Law
Talk:CyberTrust

message: Here are a few sources to get someone started on fixing up this article:
* Company Overview of Cybertrust, Inc.
* Verizon Business acquires Cybertrust
I'm going to clean up the article a little bit, but don't currently have time to do the overhaul it needs. Zell Faze (talk) 15:56, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional Sources 

message: I suggest this page gets merged into the DigiCert who owns the CyberTrust Roots.PKIhistory (talk) 00:51, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with DigiCert
Talk:Guillermo Rodríguez (politician)

message: This article needs to be balanced out. Where's the part about being a fascistic military dictator propped up by foreign businesses? --Sesel 01:30, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)

message: :My mistake. He was left-nationalist. —Seselwa 02:27, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: to someone who knows little about the subject, this article doesn't strike me as a clear case of POV. If you feel it's missing information, tag it as such. Better yet, expand it. Feco 04:56, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Is Rodriguez still alive? See discussion at the List of oldest living state leaders page. GoodDay (talk) 19:33, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rodriguez, is he still alive?
Talk:Non-monogamy

message: I've removed the "Fundamentalist" from the title of that faith; as whatever joker wrote it in surely knew that the FLDS didn't exist in the 19th century, but that it is a splinter from the LDS; it didn't exist as a separate entity from the mainstream LDS until the 1930s, and even then wasn't called the "FLDS" until modern times.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.171.129.77 (talk) 21:08, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fundamentalist LDS

message: Is "non-monogamy" being presented as a practice… or a philosophy… or a worldview… or some sort of social movement… or a deviant subculture? This is entirely unclear. Weeb Dingle (talk) 19:08, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  still needs focus 

message: Notwithstanding Dan Savage, I have to balk at monogamish presented as being an example of non-monogamy. Clearly, adultery, infidelity, and general cheating have been a significant portion of the "romantic" nonsense that's been part of monogamy for millennia, so the "-ish" is at best redundant, and the term is merely a cutesification of the status quo. In short, it ain't really nonmonogamy, and its practitioners dilettantes who can readily duck for cover when caught out — swingers have the dignity to take a step away from the easy answer.
Anyone who wants to preserve the term here needs to present at least one credible source — preferably scholarly rather than some HuffPo article or someone's blog or yet another self-pubbed "activist."Weeb Dingle (talk) 07:46, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  ish 

message: heres an spreadsheet example of all the possible arrangements: https://ethercalc.net/tvf60jwjbq6m  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.78.213.168 (talk) 21:12, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  visual representation 

message: I thought this was pertinent, plus it has links to many other sources. I do not have the time to incorporate it into this article at present, but I thought maybe some of you other editors might like do that.
*
Peaceray (talk) 20:53, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  May 2024 Slate article
Talk:Baron Rossmore

message: How come ThePeerage.com lists the following, which is at variance with the titles on Wikipedia:
*  William Warner Westenra, 6th/7th Baron Rossmore of Monaghan (born 14 February 1931); son is Hon. Benedict William Westenra (born 6 March 1983)
*  William Westenra, 5th/6th Baron Rossmore of Monaghan (born 12 July 1892, died 17 October 1958)
*  Derrick Warner William Westenra, 4th/5th Baron Rossmore of Monaghan (born 7 February 1853 - died 31 January 1921)
* Warner Westenra (presumably 3rd/4th Baron Rossmore of Monaghan)
* Henry Robert Westenra, 2nd/3rd Baron Rossmore of Monaghan (born 24 August 1792, died 1 December 1860)
* Warner William Westenra, 1st/2nd Baron Rossmore of Monaghan (born 14 October 1765, died 10 August 1842)
:: What are 1st/2nd, 2nd/3rd, 3rd/4th, 4th/5th, 5th/6th and 6th/7th supposed to mean??
::: Also, according to ThePeerage.com, the current Baron was living in County Monaghan as of 2003, so the castle may have been demolished, but apparently a new castle or at least some sort of dwelling must have been rebuilt there. Quis separabit? 20:47, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Curious

message: Please update it. 79.238.80.224 (talk) 06:24, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  German article
Talk:Homotopy sphere

message: I really don't think this article should be considered a stub, since non-trivial homotopy spheres probably don't exist, and so the only interesting thing to say about that is to point to the Poincare conjecture. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.7.71.37 (talk) 02:14, 24 January 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps if the proof the Poincaré conjecture is accepted, we should just have this article redirect to the article Poincaré conjecture. —msh210 02:08, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Homotopy spheres don't exist
Talk:Dependency

message: What about statistical dependence as opposite concept of Statistical independence? --Memming (talk) 14:05, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: What

message: There's a proposed move that would usurp the page Dependence, which redirects here.  All views are welcome.  WhatamIdoing (talk) 03:07, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed move
Talk:Hyposplenism

message: Hyposplenism should not be marked as a 'stub'.
*it is a continum from normal spleen function to its total absence (asplenism).
*Given that asplenia has the greater pathology, it make sense to have the  main entry under asplenia.
*Hyposplenism therefore should not be expanded further and should not be marked as a 'stub'.David Ruben 02:40, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Olga Benário Prestes

message: The original version was a bit garbled. I did a heavy edit based on some info I got from a quick search on the Web but I suspect that some fact checking is in order. --LeeHunter 03:15, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Blasted

message: the remaining link here is for a play of this title Phaunt 03:27, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: WP:RS are needed on: Why each production in this list is notable.  There should also be at least one link to a review for each production.  A link to the production company is not sufficient as it's from a primary source, but would be a useful additional link for each production. Lentower (talk) 20:44, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable Productions ??? 
Talk:Deathwatch beetle

message: In a sense, the death watch beetle's clicking actually is an omen of death. Every person dies eventually, so hearing the clicking is technically an omen of impending death...just not always soon after you hear it. Groundlord (talk) 17:45, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That's like saying clouds in the sky are an omen, or breathing, or drinking a glass of water. Ridiculous.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.78.199.94 (talk) 02:31, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Being born is an omen then too, because that person is just going to die eventually. See the logical fallacy in your statement? C. Pineda (クリス) (talk) 01:56, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Myth is true

message: "provided that the wood has experienced prior fungal decay" don't see evidence of this in samples from oak buildings or my firewood pile, maybe its invisible to the eye.
From the source quoted:
Furthermore, it is well known that wood-destroying fungi can break down lignin,
and until proof is available that insects cannot also do so, the assumption that the
lignin is not altered during larval digestion is hardly justifiable. TBrockaly24 (talk) 12:32, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prior fungal decay
Talk:Informational society

message: It would be useful to explain the differences between information society and informational society Reply to Vrykolaka 04:18, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)

message: There is a slight difference between information and informational society that stems from Manuel Castells' conceptualization and introduction of the term "informational society" as a successor of the term "industrial society". I expand the article with description of this difference as soon as I find a while to do that..I think there is nothing more to say about this term - only the reasons for Castells' distinction between these two terms and subsequent critique of this distinction ;] 62.240.180.103 22:08, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge question
Talk:Masterdisk

message: This sounds a lot like an advertisement.  Perhaps it would be a good idea to either change the article to be more informative or delete it. Quickbeam 05:40, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The company is notable, I think - it is referred to by a LOT of record articles, and even more are listed on the Howie Weinberg page. Apparently it's one of those companies that has a very specialized, but also very critical, role in the modern pop business. I have verified that the web pages of the company say what the article says, and I have verified that multiple record articles list Masterdisk as their production company. I have not searched for third party references, however; a quick Googling gives pages like  and , which don't pertain directly to information given, but serve to confirm the company's position in the industry. --Alvestrand 22:09, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes I can see that you're right, but i put importance tag up only because the article does not assert the subjects notability, nor does it cite any references, if you would like to fix up the article, go right ahead =). -- Librarianofages 23:43, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Vanderlei Luxemburgo

message: Uh, what?  What is this.  Need context. LizardWizard 05:41, Jan 24, 2005 (UTC)
:Apparently, a football (soccer) coach. 68.81.231.127 06:46, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.  x42bn6 Talk 09:55, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Something is wrong in this article. How to play in more than one decade, for three clubs, only 51 matches? --XXN, 20:20, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Player career
Talk:Omar Bravo

message: This section is intended for discussion on the information displayed on the article. This isn't a forum or a place to post your opinions.
--201.98.17.112 04:26, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: FELIZ COMPLEANOS OMAR BRAVO!!!!
FROM ANA BASTIDA  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.3.2.130 (talk) 12:28, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Feliz Compleanos 

message: Bold textomar bravo has said that he will most likly go to spain to racing de santander because after the mexican tornoment he will be under free contract  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.247.5.133 (talk) 15:17, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  europeon offers  

message: On Wednesday October 12, 2008 he scored his first goal for Deportivo in a 2-0 win over Elche CF in the Spanish Copa del Rey.
based on here, the home and away legs does not match the date and soccernet does not has the stats for copa del rey. Any other reliable sources?
Xaiver0510 (talk) 15:55, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Goal in Copa del Rey. 

message: U R SO SEXY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.185.234.27 (talk) 00:13, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  oMAR  

message: Why the name Omar then?  MohammedBinAbdullah (talk) 13:40, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is he Muslim? 
Talk:Imperialdramon Fighter Mode

message: Now that the all the articles have been Merged onto the Imperial Dramon article I wish to have this deleted along with Imperial Dramon Paladin Mode. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.20.153.45 (talk • contribs) 
:I can do the work, but the articles don't look as if they were merged to me. A lot of info is missing, so I'm not very sure if these articles should be deleted. Maybe if you explain a little better what happened. By the way, I should mention it's a bad idea to use "&" instead of "and" here on Wikipedia, so it would be good if you fixed those parts.--Kaonashi 06:21, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delete
Talk:African sacred ibis

message: As part of a research in comparative religion, I was wondering if any comparison could ever be made between the sacred Ibis of Thoth and the holy Dove representing the Holy Spirit. ADM (talk) 20:00, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Comparative religion

message: Couiros22 (talk) has taken exception to two categories in this article, namely Birds of East Africa and Birds of Southern Africa. And asks two questions
First, I'll point out that the range of this ibis does NOT correspond to Sub-Saharan Africa. It's range both does not include all of Sub-Saharan Africa and also includes areas outside of Sub-Saharan Africa (native areas in the Middle East and introduced areas around the world). So if the editor is basing his reasoning for his changes on that fundamental point, it is fatally flawed.
Even if the above were true, and the categories were being used correctly for the purpose of refining searches, this would necessitate the removal of the categories Birds of Africa and Birds of the Middle East, which the editor has inexplicably neglected to do.
The use of categories for the geographic location of species appears to be, from what I can see, a basic misuse of categories. And yet it is now so prevalent it appears impossible to undo. The fundamental problem with attempting to do this is that every distribution is unique and does not follow human boundaries, or even usual geographic ones. Looking at this example, if we take the principle of using the most precise category that the article is unique to then the best we can say is that it is a bird of the world, as there is no single geographic category that will suffice. If we allow the article to exist in a multiple of sub-categories, then without a strict protocol about how this is done, we end up with the uncontrolled plethora of sub-categories that we do today where the categorisation is nearly completely arbitrary, and the article can find itself validly in every possible sub-category.
In terms of this particular dispute, until there are clear guidelines on how animals are geographically categorised there is no possible way to determine which is the appropriate solution.
I did raise this as an issue a number of years ago, but garnered no interest in seeing a resolution. Jameel the Saluki (talk) 04:17, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categories
Talk:Stork

message: How long does it live? --195.3.245.67 06:09, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Depends what kind, White Storks live for about 30 years. ReedBlower (talk) 13:47, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lifetıme 

message: But isn't the Ciconiidae a family in the infobox not genera. I'm confused on the matter Alexis Ivanov (talk) 16:36, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  No knowledge of this animal 

message: What can we improve with those information on cultural significance in this baby carrying stuffs? Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 09:10, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Babies 

message: From the article:  "...the order Ciconiiformes, which was once much larger and held a number of families including herons and ibises."  Why was it much larger in the past?  Did it get redefined?  Or did it contain a lot of species that have since gone extinct?2607:FEA8:3D20:856:C107:8A2D:4DF0:3B11 (talk) 14:21, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: *I have done so. Sabine's Sunbird  talk 20:25, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification needed 

message: Good Morning, do you think it would be appropriate to add the In Fiction section to this page? ReedBlower (talk) 09:52, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: , I'll give you my opinion, since I have one (I've done some editing in the area). Not unreasonable, but I'd like even more to see a well-sourced section along the lines of Cultural depictions of ravens. On "In fiction" sections, they can be ok but use secondary sources, not the fiction itself but a decent, scholarly if possible, source that noticed that there was a stork in whatever story. I like Aesop, Storks make me think about WP:PROPORTION, especially without a good ref. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 17:55, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  In Fiction section 

message: Are there any other sources for the claim that "Muslims also traditionally revered storks because they made an annual pilgrimage to Mecca on their migration" aside from the one cited? I read the source myself and found no references to storks in Islam at all, and only found a section discussing the belief that swallows travelled to Mecca during migration.  Teddybearbutch (talk) 19:10, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Claim about being revered in Islam
Talk:Thought-terminating cliché

message: I haven't come across this idea before today, but I wonder whether Michael Gove's ridiculous comment on expertise should be added to the examples? Gwaka Lumpa (talk) 20:25, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "We've had enough of experts" 

message: The commonly-used phrase "it's not that deep" has been co-opted by Gen Z as a sort of thought-terminating cliche--implying that someone has overthought a point or overstated its importance, without ever actually engaging with either claim. I started to add it to the article, but decided not to given that there are no academic sources that list it as such. However, given its prevalence in (particularly young American) vernacular, it might be a helpful addition to the example list. By Googling "it's not that deep", I found several essays (including one in the editorial section of a university newspaper) on the phrase. Thoughts?
"" Ephun (talk) 02:05, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "It's not that deep" 

message: The sources are opinion pieces, which means I can't use the "essay" tag as the editor is not sharing their own opinions, and is clearly citing sources in good faith. However, I question whether the section provides objective and helpful information. I have opted for the "tone" tag and I hope that is accurate.
Example: "It's all good." My personal opinion aside, this is a political opinion piece from Medium and no more reliable than a well-written Reddit comment. The author does not have credentials listed and appears to be a blogger or content writer. Additionally, I don't think this is a helpful example ad the phrase is more in the realm of social niceties than argumentative rhetoric. "No prob" could be similarly analyzed but to do so would be silly. 
Second example: "Lies of the devil." Unless the article wants to delve into the use of TECs in religion, this is just confusing. It's not a widely used idiom, more of a concept, and someone unfamiliar with the subject wouldn't understand how this fits.
I think we should limit the article to a few highly exemplary, well-sourced phrases which are clearly obstructive, established as clichés, and preferably derived from the defining source material. 2603:7081:1603:A300:1141:BDAB:9C4E:6D99 (talk) 16:59, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Examples" section is questionable.