lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Stamboul Train

message: This isn't the fact at all: the destination is Constantinople or Istanbul (both names are used), and the train is never called "Orient Express" in the British  edition. The setting is a train that runs from Ostend via Cologne, Passau, Vienna, Budapest, Subotica and Belgrade to Istanbul, with a "slip-coach" separating after Belgrade to terminate at Athens. I suppose there was such a train, not necessarily called the Orient Express (our article Orient Express doesn't mention any variant beginning at Ostend), but I don't have a timetable from that period! Does anyone know? Andrew Dalby 11:50, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: No, I'm wrong. I take it back. The text above is just fine, except for a couple of missing hyphens. This was the Ostende-Wien-Orient-Express, which ran from 1925 to 1939. See the German article :de:Ostende-Wien-Express -- it was an extension of that service, as shown on the map here. Andrew Dalby 12:34, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: "in fact, the Oostende-Vienna Orient Express"
Talk:4th Marine Division (United States)

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on 4th Marine Division (United States). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120719042724/http://www.tecom.usmc.mil/HD/PDF_Files/Pubs/Units/The%204th%20Marine%20Division%20in%20World%20War%20II%20PCN%2019000412800.pdf to http://www.tecom.usmc.mil/HD/PDF_Files/Pubs/Units/The%204th%20Marine%20Division%20in%20World%20War%20II%20PCN%2019000412800.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
 --Lineagegeek (talk) 13:27, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified
Talk:Paul Yoshigoro Taguchi

message: I translated this very short article from the Norwegian Wikipedia. The bio in the Find-A-Grave link is a lot longer (but copyrighted; pick information from it, not text). --Alvestrand 09:41, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Yoshimoto Kogyo

message: I wasn't sure what sense of the word producer is intended in the final paragraph. I had been trying to disambiguate all links to producer. I'll watch this page, so if you could let me know whether it is intended to be a television producer or music producer, for example, then I (or you) can edit the link accordingly. Thanks. - Politepunk 13:23, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Changed to music producer.  freshgavinΓΛĿЌ  02:29, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Many thanks. - Politepunk 18:05, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Producers?

message: If we're going to mention the Shotengai, we might as well mention the NGK so I added it to the list of property.  The Shotengai sits underneath the NGK.
--Z026445 04:57, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Property 
Talk:Dajare

message: Just presuming.... this part is probably not encyclopedic...
"Accidentally" confusing the two similar jokes and switching the responses will produce a faint response (all the Japanese people listening will pretend to fall over) not dissimilar to the response you would get if you told the Why did the chicken cross the road joke wrong.
:A bit iffy, I admit. Merging the two jokes is supposed to be considered an extremely cheezy joke unto itself, something you'd expect from a boke.  freshofftheufoΓΛĿЌ  11:55, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that's a major part of any humor, pointing out where the metahumor comes in. Like, y'know, a horse walked into a bar, so I bit him! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.122.208.51 (talk) 20:21, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Baad Joke 

message: I like the idea of having an image to go with the article--it cements the phenomenon, really--but I think an explanation of the dajare on the sign would be helpful to curious non-Japanese-speakers. -Gemtiger 03:15, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Given that the explanation would be: 愛に雪、恋を白／会いに行き、恋をしろ(Love in the snow, make your love white/Go, meet, and love), I figured it was not only too long to fit into the caption, but not quite as entertaining as the examples provided below. That's not even a full explanation, there's multiple levels of dajare on that sign!  freshofftheufoΓΛĿЌ  11:54, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Could something like that be added to the Image:Dajare_love.jpg page? It's just a bit unsatisfying to have this image there without any explanation at all. -Gemtiger 02:27, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good idea, done!  freshofftheufoΓΛĿЌ  05:53, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image - explanation? 

message: The last three edits by 76.204.92.97 were me.I didn't realize I was not logged in. Drn8 (talk) 15:05, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits 22 may 2009
Talk:Sutherland v United Kingdom

message: As they currently stand in their articles, there is not much to suggest that Euan Sutherland and Chris Morris are notable enough in their own right to justify separate articles. I'd like to propose a merge & redirect to the European court case. My only uncertainty here is the status of Morris's legal action: was it part of the Sutherland case, or a separate case. If the latter, that complicates things a bit. SP-KP (talk) 09:51, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Chris Morris (activist)#Other gay activism now contains enough cited material and activity to suggest that an independent page is warranted. Therefore, I Oppose the merge proposal. Klbrain (talk) 13:01, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Downtown (owarai)

message: Hmmm, the information in History is repeated in Childhood and early career. It needs a bit of cleaning up there 88.106.34.82 (talk) 08:48, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Repetition

message: Maybe someone can add something about "5 rangers"... they apear in it. -- 83.9.20.216 (talk) 22:46, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 5 rangers
Talk:Koriki Choshu

message: I've temporarily removed the following information on the grounds that such results are not considered notable information, and do not belong in an article of this size. It is good enough to mention that he is a "talented singer among Japanese comedians and has the awards to prove it".
:He appeared in Fuji Television's program fourth "Owarai geinin high singing talent contest special", showed a beautiful voice and won the championship in that contest. He also got 2, 000, 000 yen and German sports car Porsche as prizes. (Then, he fought with third contest winner Jichō Kachō in the finals)''
 freshgavinΓΛĿЌ  05:56, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed news
Talk:Incinerating toilet

message: Let's expand this article and get it included in Wikipedia:Unusual articles. If we expand it five-fold, it can be featured in the Did you know? section of Wikipedia's Main Page. Cheers! Soulrefrain (Talk) 06:03, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Interesting article

message: Inventors name: Hardy Sundberg, invented in 1966  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.226.141.129 (talk) 09:59, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: some info

message: The "benefits" section is clearly a copy/paste or catalog summary. It's mentioning specific models from the New Zealand company listed in references. 83.70.170.48 (talk) 13:00, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertising? 

message: I was googlin' for more info about the turd burner as they referred to it as in dirty jobs. Maybe a redirect is in order?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.129.146.14 (talk) 03:56, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Turd burner? 
Talk:Marvel Alternate Universe Continuum

message: It would be a good idea to have only one page concerting this stuff. Merge JQF 18:27, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree they should be merged, presumably with this article being the 'main' one as it has been more thoroughly fleshed out.  I'd say someone can take the info from the Multiverse (Marvel Comics) article, add it here, and then delete the other article. - Markeer 05:01, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger 

message: Some have gotten confirmed in various Handbook besides the alternate Earth one.
I know.  The Alternate Universes Handbook had the most.  I try and add when something was confirmed like the Exiles have confirmed the two new alternate 2099 and New universe dimensions.
Originalsinner 01:36, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Some have gotten confirmed
Talk:Martin Jacques

message: Added representative quotation. Blima3000 10:23, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Roma (comics)

message: Should the now-deleted Merlyn article (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Merlyn_(Marvel_Comics)&diff=prev&oldid=929831179) be merged into this article? 146.112.56.80 (talk) 03:32, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merlyn
Talk:Lionheart (Marvel Comics)

message: "Kelsey selflessly put herself between the fallen Captain and Wasp" -- I don't get it.  Surely she put herself between Thunderball and the fallen Captain and Wasp?
Neutron Jack 01:10, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:555th Parachute Infantry Battalion (United States)

message: I notice some reference to the 555th PIR. Sorry, the 555th PIB never got inflated to Regimental status. When it was decided to inflate them, the decision was made to integrate them into the 82nd ABD as the 3/505th PIR, which is their status to this day. SSG Cornelius Seon (Retired) 13:02, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 555 PARACHUTE INFANTRY REGIMENT

message: The 555th refers to themselves as the "Triple Nickles" not the "Triple Nickels".  According to the organization's website:
"The 555th Parachute Infantry Battalion was nicknamed the 'Triple Nickles' because of its numerical designation and the selection of 17 of the original 20-member "colored test platoon" from the 92nd Infantry (Buffalo) Division.  Hence, the origin of the term Buffalo Nickles; the spelling derives from old English. Three buffalo nickels joined in a triangle or pyramid is the identifying symbol." "The History of the Triple Nickle 555th Parachute Infantry Battalion"  http://www.triplenickles.com/history.htm  Ygbsm (talk) 03:37, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Nickle vs Nickel

message: I just read a news article that states there is still a surviving member at 107 years old. https://abc7.com/abc7-salutes-army-veteran-party/13429517/?utm_source=join1440&utm_medium=email&utm_placement=newsletter 74.135.243.172 (talk) 15:04, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last surviving member
Talk:Court of Appeal of Newfoundland and Labrador

message: Officially, the Court of Appeal is a division of The Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador. See the Judicature Act, particularly s. 3(2)(a). --Mathew5000 04:59, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: * "The Court of Appeal Act received Royal Assent on December 7, 2017, and came into force on January 1, 2018. While, previously, the Court of Appeal was a division of the Supreme Court, the Act establishes the “Court of Appeal of Newfoundland and Labrador” as a separate Court. As part of its consequential amendments, the Act continues the “Trial Division of the Supreme Court of Newfoundland” as the “Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador”. The Supreme Court will continue to be composed of a General Division and a Family Division."http://www.lawsociety.nf.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/2017-01-02-Notice-to-the-Profession-New-Court-of-Appeal-Act.pdf - 98.143.128.74 (talk) 15:49, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  official name 
Talk:James Relly

message: One of the publications attributed to Relly is "An Elegy on ... Whitefield"; the source is DNB. In my efforts to locate this work, I succeeded in finding only works by other authors (I used a title search in Worldcat.org). Perhaps others can help here, particularly those with access to sources more primary than the DNB.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ArthurOgawa (talk • contribs) 22:19, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  An Elegy on ... Whitefield
Talk:Carmen Kass

message: Apparently, the rationale is missing in here...
<BR>-Mardus 10:50, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, that is a mirror site which displays Wikipedia articles, as the smalltext at the bottom of the page says ("This article is copied from an article on Wikipedia.org"). The GFDL license allows this. See Wikipedia:Mirrors and forks. PeepP 12:48, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This and other Wikipedias in other languages have been relentlessly spammed by anonymous IPs based in Israel (where the domain is registered) for many months. It's gotten sufficiently bad as to warrant addition to the spam blacklist and I have removed a number of these links in anticipation of blacklisting:
*Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spam#modelsobserver.com (permanent link)
*:meta:Talk:Spam blacklist#modelsobserver.com (permanent link)
Most, but not all, had been added by the site-owner.
If an established, high-volume editor sees value to the specific link I deleted from this article, please let me know and it can be evaluated for addition to the spam "whitelist"
--A. B. (talk •  contribs)  03:26, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: modelsobserver.com links

message: quoted "supermodel Carmen Kass" has about 2,110 returns in google  and 8 in google books . In case it might be a problem that some models happen to be  supermodels, it should be taken to relevant article. As long as Carmen Kass is listed as a supermodel and that includes published books, there is no reason to manipulate this fact according to personal opinions by removing the sources like the edit  by User:Catgut. Unless of course we should establish the notability of this model by quoting the WP supermodel article an say that Carmen Kass is a highly-paid élite fashion model who has worldwide reputation. Also, User:Catgut please read WP:NPOV since removing facts and sources can't be justified with this policy. WP:NPOV doesn't mean No Point of View but ..in case you can come up with sources that say Carmen Kass is notable because this and that, not because she is considered to be a supermodel, you should add the facts and the sources to the article instead of removing already established facts and sources. Thanks! --Termer (talk) 00:58, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: model vs. supermodel
Talk:Paramountcy (Canada)

message: This article claims that historically the doctrine was used more freely even if there was no conflict. Does anyone know the source for this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.232.76.116 (talk) 03:32, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not that it was used when there was no conflict;  it's that the definition of conflict has changed.  Originally, the courts used what's called the "occupied field" approach - that if Parliament had legislated in an area, then the Provinces could not legislate in that area. (Similar to the US federal preemption approach.)  However, for the past 60 years or so, they've used a narrower definition of "operational conflict."  Paramountcy isn't triggered simply when Parliament and the Legislature have passed laws affecting the same matter.  The two laws have to be in actual conflict, so that it's impossible for the citizen to comply with both simultaneously.  This definition of conflict is a less intrusive judicial approach, as it keeps the courts from intervening except in cases where it is simply not possible for both laws to operate simultaneously.Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 03:46, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  historical view on paramountcy 

message: There was a tag stating that the article didn't cite any sources in support.  I've removed it, since the article cites four cases from the Supreme Court of Canada in support of its thesis.
Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 05:16, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  citations of authorities
Talk:King Kong 2: Ikari no Megaton Punch

message: I'm convinced this is the most in-depth English language page about this game on the net. I wrote most of the article after forcing myself to play through the entire game on an emulator using save states. After sitting for hours, finding all the hidden doorways and power-ups (which I'm convinced I did since I searched every last inch of this game), I had nightmares for days to follow. Anyway, as usual, if you know anything about this game that I didn't mention, don't be afraid to contribute! Buzda 11:02, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

message: Reception should be rewritten to have an objective tone. I thought maybe adding "According to Retro Gaming Review " would help, but the linked article doesn't even use the word "underwhelming", so who says it's underwhelming? 80.98.191.91 (talk) 22:10, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception is subjective
Talk:Weyl group

message: Root system claims that the Weyl group associated to A_n hat (n+1)! elements. I haven't checked this myself, but at least for n=2 they seem to be right: The hexagon has 3 diagonals meeting at its center. The reflections on these diags genearate the dihedral group of the equilateral triangle. Rgds --Boobarkee (talk) 13:56, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The Weyl group associated to A_n is the symmetric group on n+1 points and has (n+1)! elements.  I have no idea what the intro to this article was talking about, but I deleted the incorrect statement. JackSchmidt (talk) 14:10, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weyl group of A2 has only order 6 

message: I am under the impression that there is a definition of the Weyl group of a root system and a definition of a Weyl group of a split reductive algebraic group with a given maximal torus, and the fact that these two coincide is a theorem. I think it would be useful to state both definitions. As it stands, it's a bit strange that the section on Bruhat Decomposition gives a completely different definition of the Weyl group.
Owen Jones (talk) 14:53, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two different definitions 

message: In this article of wikipedia there is no definition of a weyl group. only different perspectives how to see it. what about N_G(T)/T as definition?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.230.30.96 (talk) 14:49, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  there is no definition 

message: There seems to be a relation between Weyl symmetry and Conformal symmetry.  Is there also a relation between a Weyl group and a Conformal group?  My hunch would be yes. Can't find it in the article, though. 70.247.162.34 (talk) 04:16, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relation to Conformal Group? 

message: This definition appears in the section Weyl chambers:
"If \Phi\subset V is a root system, we may consider the hyperplane perpendicular to each root \alpha. Recall that \sigma_\alpha denotes the reflection about the hyperplane and that the Weyl group is the group of transformations of V generated by all the \sigma_\alpha's. The complement of the set of hyperplanes is disconnected, and each connected component is called a Weyl chamber. If we have fixed a particular set Δ of simple roots, we may define the fundamental Weyl chamber associated to Δ as the set of points v\in V such that (\alpha,v)>0 for all \alpha\in\Delta."
It's the last sentence that seems possibly wrong to me. It does not seem consistent with the illustration that has as caption "The Weyl group of the A2 root system is the symmetry group of an equilateral triangle" (but the illustration seems correct).
Am I missing something here?216.161.117.162 (talk) 16:33, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably, but since you don't explain what you think is inconsistent, I don't know how you expect anyone to help you.  (The illustration does not illustrate the fundamental chamber.)  The Math Reference Desk would be a better place for questions like this. --JBL (talk) 16:05, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this right?
Talk:Socket F

message: June '06? There are 5 days left? Somehow I don't think it will be fully released and available to buy in the next 5 days... Shall it be removed? Help plz 21:00, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Changed release date based on this. Help plz 20:10, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Release Date

message: The redirect Socket F(1207) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Steel1943 (talk) 16:15, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Socket F(1207)]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Mount Lowe Railway

message: This article has been completely rewritten and will undergo a series of inline references in an attempt to attain Feature Article nomination.----Magi Media 06:28, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've been looking for Altadena photos, and I noticed the LA Public Library's excellent photo collection has many free-PD photos of this railway system.  Feel free to mine it. --Bobak 21:03, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  More photos available at LAPL website 

message: Nice article, but most of the lede should be moved to the History section. GeorgeLouis (talk) 01:15, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The lede is too long. 

message: Telecine Guy 06:49, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 
Talk:Datong

message: I would like to create a separate disambiguation page for other uses of "Datong/Tatung".
However, I would prefer just to have a single disambig page for both words, as they are (as far as I can tell- I do not speak any form of Chinese) simply different renderings of the same Chinese word in English. Does this sound okay? 
Of course, we could not that (e.g.) it was probably *not* okay to call Tatung Company, Datong, but that is a minor point. Fourohfour 11:22, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You are right about the Romanization of datong/tatung being the same.  Datong is the official Hanyu Pinyin romanization of 大同, while tatung is a possible old Wade-Giles rendering, still in use some places outside of mainland China. Sun da sheng 05:50, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation page

message: This was also a capital during the Liao dynasty right? Tooironic (talk) 04:38, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  capital during the Liao dynasty 

message: Xiong (s.v. "Daijun") claims that Pingcheng was not exactly present-day Datong but to its northeast. — LlywelynII 10:04, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Pingcheng

message: The link at the end of the website doesn't work: http://www.dt.gov.cn/%20Datong. http://www.dt.gov.cn/Datong doesn't work either.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.6.155.83 (talk) 17:50, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Link at end doesn't work