Talk:Florence King

message: Has anyone got a reference for the Episcopalian practice? The site currently at the end of that sentence only specifies her atheism. Leon 11:54, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 15:29, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject class rating

message: * Barbara Creaturo. "Please look away, Dixie Land" (book review of Confessions), The New York Times, February 10, 1985.
* Ross C. Reeves. "Florence King: Southern sense and sensibility" (review of Florence King Reader), The Virginian-Pilot, March 12, 1995, page J2.
Just FYI. Lawikitejana (talk) 09:16, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional possible refs

message: :File:Florence king.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 05:13, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for File:Florence king.jpg

message: :File:Southernladiesandgentlemen1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 05:37, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for File:Southernladiesandgentlemen1.jpg

message: I've changed the story of why she left UMiss because it refers to an unavailable source which is wildly in conflict with the account in her autobiography. This is definitely a BLP issue where we cannot depend on unverifiable sources; I'm not happy about having to go with a primary source but the old text cannot be restored unless someone can produce it. Mangoe (talk) 18:13, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Having managed to get at the page through Internet Archive it's clear that it doesn't state that she quit UMiss because her lover was killed. It's not even clear that its source is anything other than King's book. Mangoe (talk) 20:04, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  On why she quit UMiss 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Florence King. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070219091346/http://shs.starkville.k12.ms.us/mswm/MSWritersAndMusicians/writers/KingFlorence/FlorenceKing.html to http://shs.starkville.k12.ms.us/mswm/MSWritersAndMusicians/writers/KingFlorence/FlorenceKing.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070304231816/http://nhnh.essortment.com/florenceking_rzkm.htm to http://nhnh.essortment.com/florenceking_rzkm.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:25, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I've left this passage as is for the moment:
"King was a traditionalist conservative, but not a "movement conservative," and she objected to much of the populist direction of the contemporary American Right.[1] She was an active Episcopalian (though she often referred to her agnosticism),[1] a member of Phi Alpha Theta, and a monarchist."
because I am trying to come up with a more nuanced approach. It is a good passage as written, but as one sees in the source, she made these points in 1998 based on a position she had held already by then for many years. The populism she decried was one she had seen emerging in American conservatism since the beginnings of its modern incarnation in the 50s and 60s. That being what was called "movement conservatism". The one that culminated with the Reagan Administration and then went all sectarian and splintered. 
King almost belongs, or perhaps does belong, with the category sometimes called "paleoconservatism", as opposed to "neoconservatism", a slippery term but one which has more or less gelled in the past 25 years
All of which might ultimately be meaningless but in the times we are living in now [written 2019], the term "traditionalist conservative" or traditional conservative tend now to get applied to exactly the sorts of things King opposed. Random noter (talk) 14:29, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Politics