lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Brandon Sutter

message: Why should this article be deleted ? 
Some people not in this domain might not know it, but Sutter, is a top prospect for the next NHL Entry Draft, we're not talking about a minor leaguer who has no chance of making it to the Pro level.
The dude 2 07:19, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Was wondering the same thing.  Just because he spent a couple years in Chicago while his dad played there (and I'm not certain that is even accurate) does not mean he has any ties to the city or state.  I suspect the project banners were added by a bot that picked up on the word Chicago.  I've removed them, as it is the equivalent of overcategorization. Resolute 04:24, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If the article has :Category:People from Chicago it falls in the list of categories our bot will tag twice a week.  Remove the cat from the article before removing the tag here.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM)  21:41, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done, thanks.  Resolute Lest We Forget 22:41, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Why?
Talk:Prefontaine Classic

message: Can someone clarify how the first Prefontaine Classic was held prior to his death? Did it go under a different name that year? Was it's name not a memorial effort? 68.178.23.126 21:47, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The event was established in 1973 and renamed after his death, as the article explains. Doprendek (talk) 03:53, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

text: I fixed it. --Liface 08:38, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The tables with records are full of dead links. (I don't know how to fix it.) -- KWiki (talk) 09:31, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I could be terse here, but google a new link.  We can't control when other web hosts delete content, but this meet is so notable that the same information is duplicated in the agate of some newspaper.  It's somewhere.  Many of those links were IAAF who are notorious for moving the content to a different address on a whim. Trackinfo (talk) 10:18, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  I know, I just gave a general notification, nothing else. Thanks in any case. -- KWiki (talk) 11:57, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: This kind of goes to my issue with writing these long and unnecessarily complex reference templates.  They serve no purpose.  We post the location the information came from, it doesn't need any further detail.  It doesn't serve to protect us long term if someone changes the link, it will still go dead.  All this information that was posted in previous years has been here for that time.  Its been open to challenge if it were wrong (it wasn't to my knowledge and I watch this stuff with pretty good detail, as do others).  If someone wants to challenge the content, first do your due diligence and look up an alternative or archive link.  There is a lot of cross-referencing of this information, particularly at the high level of this meet.  Prove it wrong. Trackinfo (talk) 16:55, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead links 

message: I have changed establishments dates to 1973; 1975 was renaming, but not establishment. Doprendek (talk) 03:53, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: 1973 establishment
Talk:List of Danish wars

message: I think List of Danish wars should be merged into Military history of Denmark since the two articles basically covers the same subject. Gardar Rurak 07:28, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Since there is no objections I will go forward with the merge. Gardar Rurak 07:32, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Rustlers' Rhapsody

message: The content of the article includes a lot of quotes.  Should a Wikiquote page be opened for this film?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.28.224.198 (talk) 23:36, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Quotes

message: Is it just me, or does the entire "Forgotten Film" section sound POV and OR?  It doesn't cite any refs, as any such section should.  I elect to delete the whole section.  Any opposition? — Frecklefσσt | Talk 14:20, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: "Forgotten Film"

message: After his initial confrontation with Bob Barber, Rex and the Colonel's Daughter have sex (unseen behind a large rock) after which she says "It was a real high *point*." That makes Rex a *confident* heterosexual, implying he was a virgin before. I remember that part from a rental tape from back when the movie was just released on tape. I picked up a home video VHS release at a thrift store and didn't see that scene. Bizzybody (talk) 20:09, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Home video deleted scene?
Talk:Echo amphitheater

message: I believe the correct spelling is "Echo Amphitheater," per, for example, the Carson National Forest web site, http://www.fs.fed.us/r3/carson/index.shtml (and references therein).  I'm not normally a curmudgeon on the subject of American vs. Commonwealth English, but shouldn't the "official" spelling be preferred? -- Bill-on-the-Hill (talk) 22:11, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Christian Democratic Party (South Africa)

message: It worth mentioning that the CDP homepage describes Nelson Mandela as a terrorist and defends apartheid as a Christian crusade against Communism. Racism is alive and well in South Africa... well this was certainly written by CDP folks. perhaps it would be useful to get a moderator in here to clean this up? -- (Unknown)
: Why do you think is it worth mentioning that they say Mandela is a terrorist?  Tell us what it is you think Mandela went to prison for?  And... there are moderators on Wikipedia???? :-) -- leuce (talk) 15:51, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ideology 

message: This reads like an advertisement for this party.  It is full of glowing praise for the party leaders, including some quite non-objective comments about them.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.148.182.17 (talk) 23:03, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I prefer that parties submit stuff than simply not submit stuff at all.  We can always wikify it later.  As I have done in this case. -- leuce (talk) 16:30, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPoV 
Talk:Breakdown section

message: The proper term in it's highest form has always been breakdown section.  Breaks is a derivation of this.
Copying this comment over from Break (music) where this page had been redirected:
I object to the redirection of "breakdown section", which is a separate and distinct terminology and the parent concept behind break as in breakdance. Breakdown Section is the highest and most proper terminology for this usage, and it has its own singular origin and usage. Start asking REAL DJs what the most appropriate term is before you take the entire language into your own hands and move things out of order. What about discussion on such matters? - tednor
Also, I reverted the page back to the proposed merge template. Tednor may have a good point here, I really don't know enough about the topic to judge. I'll tag it as a stub for now, we may want to have an AFD discussion as I'm not sure if there is enough material out there to justify a whole article. Perel 13:45, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I must've moved right after the merge template was put up, so I didn't see it.  Unless you can provide some kind of proof that this is the "real" term, or you can provide more information and cite some sources, I suggest that you merge this information into Break (music).  Also, you can sign your posts by typing four tildes or ~~~~.  John Reaves 15:38, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

message: The article on Breaks itself makes the point that breakdown and break are distinct.  Has anybody read it???
What is missed here by those recommending to move is that hip hop would not have developed from breaks alone: they are simply too short to use for the purpose intended in hip hop music. Only an extremely skilled DJ cutting at lightning speed could use breaks and not breakdown sections! It had to be the breakdown sections which were used, else the hip hop era could not feasibly have begun until after the era of digital audio, capiche??If this is accepted, then Breakdown Section becomes the parent concept of hip hop musical culture and must have unique placement to avoid screwing up the whole lineage. Also, I can elaborate on breakdown sections and I'm only one user of the Wiki. (see the artist Lime page for some further ideas which can be placed in breakdown section, there are far more I assure you, such as dance records without noticable breakdown sections, breakdown sections which themselves became SONGS (Ride on Time by Black Box and Rapper's Delight come to mind right off the cuff).  I am frustrated because the people who want to mess with this language simply don't understand it and yet are voting for deletion less than a day after i posted this, in fact someone wanted to delete it right away!  C'mon people, how about we all LEARN something from the WIKI!  I am sorry for the tone but this is my first editing dispute and I am incredibly frustrated by the lack of advocates and the haste of my opponents.  I thank you all for your consideration and for Wiki-ing in the first place.--Tednor 18:07, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please notice and read this clarification of my assertion
Talk:That Was Then... This Is Now

message: Is there a soundtrack on cd from the film? If anyone knows, it would be helpful if it was added.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.56.56.140 (talk) 11:03, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Soundtrack? 

message: Hi!  Just a quick note...  I removed the edit stating that this is a sequel to the Outsiders.  "Connections to other books by S.E. Hinton" is a subtopic in the That Was Then, This is Now article.  While some characters from the Outsiders make an appearance in That Was Then, the novel and film is not a sequel to the Outsiders.  The author, S.E. Hinton, has stated that there will never be a sequel to the Outsiders
 
Coffeesweet (talk) 15:16, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sequel to the Outsiders?
Talk:Den Gamle By

message: The word "village" should not be used in this article. The museum refers to it self (at least in Danish) as being " the Danish market town museum". the building is also larger then village buildings, and fishing and farming is not a part of the museum. Minting, governance and early industry is however a part. 217.198.215.136 17:25, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. The speciality of this open-air museum is exactly the fact that it is not a village museum but a town museum, and the first of its kind. Unless there are any objections, I will change this throughout the article. --Thathánka Íyotake (talk) 01:39, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone reverted the change. Would you mind writing here about your ojections to the change so we can solve it like that instead. Thanks in advance! --Thathánka Íyotake (talk) 02:25, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh my. Now the change is suddenly there again. No problem then, but this must be another example of a "ghost page" or a page suddenly temporarily appearing in an older version. Weird. --Thathánka Íyotake (talk) 02:29, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Village?

message: "The merchant's mansion from Aarhus is the main parts of a large mansion originally situated in the centre of Aarhus on what is now the place of the city hall."
* City Hall is placed at the site of the former Assistens Cemetery (assistenskirkegaard).
* The merchant's mansion was placed opposit the present City Hall. At contruction well placed outside city boundries.85.83.81.228 (talk) 15:29, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Corrected the location.  shows the merchant's mansion just to right of the gate, the graveyard is the present city hall square, and the horsemen are training at the dragoon barracks now Ridehuset/Musikhuset.94.145.236.194 (talk) 22:07, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: City Hall
Talk:Turk 182

message: Why is Star Wars referenced in the See Also?209.43.10.235 (talk) 02:08, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: A vandal.  Removed.  Tempshill (talk) 17:13, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Star Wars? 

message: What has being a Turk got to do with this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.85.23.212 (talk) 10:37, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Turk 

message: I know it has been 25+ years, but I could swear that I read "Turk 182" in Junior High School as a book before it came out in movie form. However, I can find no reference or indication of the book preceeding the movie.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.210.27.106 (talk) 12:02, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Book? 

message: The page says that this was one of the first PG-13 movies, and one of the sources listed is this NY Times article: http://www.nytimes.com/movie/review?res=9D04E1D81439F936A25751C0A963948260
The problem is that the article states "Running time: 97 minutes. This film is rated R."
I am removing the article as a source because it directly contradicts what it is supposed to be a source for.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by DugongAKAmanatee (talk • contribs) 12:58, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Film rating 

message: The sign on the bridge said "Queensborough" because the "U" was necessary for the plot (spelling TURK). The only reference to this factoid I could find is here:
https://www.nytimes.com/1984/07/05/nyregion/new-york-day-by-day-045274.html. I made that small change to the text, but didn't add the reference with a footnote.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danchall (talk • contribs) 17:48, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Queensborough"
Talk:Great Swamp National Wildlife Refuge

message: Hi there.  I hate to be an ass about this sort of thing, but can we get some more pictures of the swamp in summer or mid-late spring when there are actually leaves on the trees?  With the exception of the beautiful photograph of the swamp in the fall, all the pictures look like they were taken during that icky time in early spring when the snow is gone, but the leaves haven't returned.  Everything look so sickly and lame.  It doesn't do the ecosystem justice. 
-Sam  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.198.197.187 (talk) 04:50, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Plato's four cardinal virtues

message: This article has a strongly-Christian bias that is actually a mis-interpretation of Plato.  In different dialogues, Plato posits different theories of virtue stemming from the theories of his interlocutors.  For instance, in the Euthyphro, piety is argued to be the the most important virtue because Euthyphro lacks piety according to Socrates' own definition. However, Plato rarely puts forth positive arguments to be taken as his own (via Socrates).  In the Republic, Plato argues in Book IV for certain virtues, but even in this case there are not four "cardinal" virtues to be taken as Plato's own view. 
Augustine, and Aquinas, were both well-read in Aristotle and Plato.  The idea of "cardinal" or "primary" was first used by them to reconcile Platonic philosophy with early Christianity.  Both of the citations are not reliable sources on Plato.  Neither of these deal with Greek philosophy.  This solidifies my concern that this article is biased to the point of inaccuracy; the Catholic Church's Encyclopedia is in no way an authority, or even reputable source, for Plato. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.146.197.78 (talk) 02:35, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've been waiting since October for the promised changes after the article was deprodded; I don't believe they are forthcoming and (based on my knowledge of Plato) I don't believe that they can be forthcoming.  I would merge and redirect this to the article on Plato or the Republic.  We can't remove the information as false, since it is verifiable, but WP:UNDUE suggests against giving it its own article.  As it stands, an independent article on the Catholic understanding of Plato, presented as an article on Plato, runs afoul of WP:NPOV and WP:COATRACK. RJC TalkContribs 16:20, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Please go ahead and prod it again RJC. My position has changed since last time. -Pollinosisss (talk) 04:33, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misinterpretation
Talk:The Doctor (1991 film)

message: There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Doctor Who#Redirecting 'The Doctor' to Doctor Who's 'The Doctor' about that thing it says in the link. —174.141.182.82 (talk) 15:31, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed redirect
Talk:Gyaruo

message: The article title and image caption are Gyaru-oh, but in the article itself it's written Gyaru-o. What's correct and what's the difference between these ways of writing it?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.253.186.62 (talk) 17:47, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: o or oh?

message: I think this article can expand on negative reputation.
:Second--Gee totes (talk) 20:19, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gyaru-oh reputation
Talk:Konti–Skan

message: "the conductor to the common grounding of Kontiskan 1 and 2 near Risø on the Baltic Sea." 
- This is most likely an error - Risø is in Denmark, not in Sweden, so it doesn't make too much sense. I'm afraid I don't know what it should be though...
130.226.56.2 08:14, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Shimmer Women Athletes

message: This article is a mass of fancruft (roster list, match results) if the article is about the promotion then the article should reflect that. If this isnt adressed soo those sections will be removed. --- Paulley
Thanks Paulley for ruining this article. you can just delete it cuz it's useless now.
The notability concern was ridiculous, but I understand that a major overhaul had to happen eventually when I compared it to other articles such as the Ring of Honor entry.  But as it is right now, I think it's poorly worded and doesn't flow all that well(and does the first taping really need 2 references?).  I made an initial attempt at editing a little last night and add some things that I believed are worth mentioning, but I when I came back to it this morning I see that Lakes reverted it back to to what he first edited it to without any reasoning.  Why even bother if it's going to be policed in such a fashion.  brimoral
Please explain why if it is considered fancruft but WWE listing is filled with similar information. It seems that the actual quality of posts is determined by its notability which will only hurt the overall quality of wikipedia and why people look up information on it. Most of us have regular encyclopedias and use this to look up content that would be neglected in normal reference books. I believe that if you’re going to institute guidelines they should be followed regardless and I personally think roster lists (another feature that the WWE listing has) is an important part of any promotion. Match Results should not be included from the DVD’s but a roster list and information about the promotion is necessary for comprehensive information about the subject. Abangyarudo 17:11, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: cleanup
Talk:Credit River

message: It's an unusual name - anybody have any idea where it came from? Fishhead64 08:35, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name?

message: The article currently claims the name etymology is from the eastern Ojibwe Missinnihe which they claim means "trusting river". Another version seems to be Mazina'iga which when looked up in an Ojibwe dictionary simply means credit (https://ojibwe.lib.umn.edu/main-entry/mazina-amaw-vta). Could it be that "trusting" is simply a different interpretation of the word credit (i.e. trusting that you'll pay back)? The book linked for the source of the trusting river interpretation ultimately traces back to Augustus Jones "names of the rivers and creeks as they are called by the mississaugas...," 1796 surveyor's letters. However, I can't find this text to verify if it does give this etymology. Waxwing96 (talk) 15:23, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doubts about name etymology
Talk:Crofton, British Columbia

message: It is my goal to make this page a featured article before June 1st of 2007. I think that this really only needs some more references and more in depth detail to do so, as well as more photos. The only difficult problem will be getting references, as not a lot is written about Crofton. But I will make it happen. Kaiser matias 08:38, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  My Goal 
Talk:Thomas V. Morris

message: Thomas V. Morris is an important educator, author and thinker. His books have important significance both in academics as well as in the business realm. An administrator accused me of spam by putting a referral link on the links to his book, but as I explained elsewhere this is not true. Anyway, this is like fighting a losing battle so I give up!--Rwphan 08:40, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I just wanted to point out that this wiki page looks to me like self-promotion
I am new to contributing to wiki but I’ve used it for a long time and I value the neutral information
This page does not look neutral to me 
I have done some brief reading of Tom Morris and he is trying to sell books and his philosophy is pro religion WikipedeASH (talk) 18:44, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment 

message: I think this page should be placed for deletion. Not only does it appear to be self-promotion, it is riddled with nonsensical errors. I translated  this page from Hindi only noticed that most of the article jumps between discussing many different topics. It appears to discuss an Indian man, surname Mirsha, to an American man with the surname Morris. I cannot click any of the sources to verify as they are either dead or inaccessible.
CherriGasoline (talk) 07:49, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion
Talk:Grand Ronde, Oregon

message: Yes, it has wetter winters than summers, but 100" of rain a year NEVER qualifies as a Meditteranean Climate. Those climates are mostly dry (like Los Angeles, a classic example), not mostly wet. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 63.231.60.142 (talk) 05:10, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's "a mediterranean climate", in any case.--Jerzy•t 08:55, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meditteranean Climate? Please! 

message: I was about to sort out whether the #Meditteranean Climate? Please! talk contributions are applicable to the NW or the NE cluster of topics, but i suspect that's the hardest question involved here. I may just copy that section to the other talk page, and append, to each of the two talk pages following that text that they will then have in common, a comment about my remaining confused abt where it really belongs! --Jerzy•t 11:39, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pending repatriation of talk contributions (if any)  originally made at [[Talk:Grand Ronde, Oregon|Talk:Gran''d'' Ronde, Oregon]], but concerning only [[Grande Ronde, Oregon|Gran''de'' Ronde, Oregon]] 

message: The distinction between names with one silent terminal E, or two of them, is confusing enough for the human eye (perhaps especially one of a non-speaker of French) that i consider any choice other than a common Dab page for both of the spellings of the similar place names a betrayal of our users' interests. I'll discuss details of my (still tentative) design on the Dab page's talk page . --Jerzy•t 11:39, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sharing a Dab page ([[Grande Rond(e), Oregon]]) 