lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin

message: Two different pages on the Federal Judicial Center website (their biography of Conley and their listing of future vacancies) say Conley was nominated to replace Crabb.  The White House website says likewise.  However, the FJC's website says Crabb was due to take senior status at the end of this year.  
So, what happened?  How can Conley be confirmed now?  Did Obama switch his nomination to fill the other vacancy instead?  Is the FJC website wrong and Crabb took senior status at the end of last year?  TheUnknown285 (talk) 19:30, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confused about the Conley appointment. 

message: *Robert W. Kastenmeier United States Courthouse
**:File:Robert W. Kastenmeier United States Courthouse.jpg
— Cirt (talk) 19:15, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article to create
Talk:2004 United States presidential election in Wisconsin

message: A description of WI as a toss up state is probably accurate.  Suggesting that it compares to MN in that regard is not, at least as it relates to Presidential Elections.  MN has voted (D) in the last 9 Presidential Elections and will likely repeat that performance in 2012.  That's 40 years since MN voted (R).  MN also distinguishes itself by being the only State in the lower 48 to vote for Mondale (D) in the 1984 Presidential Election against Reagan (R).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.73.83.233 (talk) 02:55, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:All the Girls in the World Beware!!!

message: The article claims that "Some Kind of Wonderful" was released on 16 December 1974.  False!  The song bowed at #67 on the Hot 100 two days earlier, on 14 December 1974.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.151.174.67 (talk) 23:33, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Some Kind of Wonderful"
Talk:Wave cloud

message: User:203.118.177.188 deleted an image I added, stating that it was not wave clouds but something called Kelvin-Helmholtz instability. That I can accept (as I'm not a meteorologist), though sadly there is no article explaining what this is. Unfortunately this editor is using an anon IP, so I can do nothing much to ask him/her about this except to post this message here and hope he/she sees it. This formation is not that uncommon in this particular area, must have something to do with the particular lie of the land, but the still image doesn't really convey what happens: a video would be a lot more dramatic, as the clouds really are very dynamic as they form and deform, looking exactly like waves as you see them in the sea (which is why I assumed they WERE wave clouds). The impression is that the peaks and troughs stay roughly where they are as the clouds drift through, rising and falling. I'd like to know more about this. Graham 13:56, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Correction - after posting this the KH link came up blue, so there is an article after all - funny, a search didn't find it! Graham 13:58, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

message: On 08 April 2008, I observed a series of nice wave clouds above a flat area in North-eastern Belgium (altitude of the ground in this area: ~ 20 m above sea level)  where there is absolutely no mountain range. So, I have a question: how does it form in the high sky in the absence of mountains below ? Thanks for any answer if you have a clue. 
Shinkolobwe (talk) 13:05, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Just an observation in the sky during a nice evening of April 2008

message: I changed the references so that they link to "Internal Waves" which is the accurate term.  Standing Waves, of course, can only exist between refelctive barriers.  Internal Waves appear to be "standing still" but are actually moving very slowly, because the speed of a wave is linked to the vertical rate of change of density the fluids.  Mrdavenport (talk) 19:16, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Internal Waves - Not Standing Waves
Talk:De Havilland Canada DHC-5 Buffalo

message: Does anyone have details about the time a DHC-5 Buffalo landed inside a baseball stadium (possibly Yankee Stadium in NY) and took off again.  I saw the video years ago but am unable to find any info on this event on the Web.Hudicourt 16:30, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Landing inside a Baseball field

message: Does anybody know the DHC- 5's take off and landing distances. The article mentions that it is a STOL aircraft. 2.120.5.170 (talk) 10:55, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The publication de Havilland Canada: DHC-5A Buffalo STOL Tactical Transport, page 6. de Havilland Canada, May 1971 claims take-off and landing distances of 2,100 ft (640 m). I will add this. - Ahunt (talk) 14:12, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It depends on the weight - Jane's 1982–83 (as used in the specifications) gives a take-off run of 2300 ft and a landing distance of 850 ft at MTOW (49200 lb) which drops to 950 ft and 550 ft with a 12,000 lb payload (compared at 18000 lb at MTOW).Nigel Ish (talk) 15:38, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The company data says that 2100 feet is at 49,200 lbs for take-off and 46,900 for landing and those numbers are to and from a 50 ft obstacle. At 41,000 lbs take-off and 39,100 for landing the landing over a 50 ft obstacle becomes 1210 ft and the landing 980 ft. - Ahunt (talk) 16:09, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Take Off and Landing Distances
Talk:Raina Telgemeier

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Thesocialistesq/M.lesocialiste 06:31, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: I'm working on a substantial rewrite of this article, particular because much of the content is either unsourced or sourced to primary sources. Can I ask that editors be patient with the presence of material in a BLP article with citation needed tags, at least until I have the chance to go through all the citations, and search for more, to see if current material can be sourced. Thanks. HenryCrun15 (talk) 02:24, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Starting substantial rewrite
Talk:Drew (artist)

message: I removed the link to wherearethedogshumping.com as it redirects to superpoop and as such there were two links that would take you to superpoop--91.108.101.231 (talk) 08:10, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The following section on music was recently removed because "Dog Traders was not/is not a band."
:In addition to authoring his comic, Drew releases music with his band, Dog Traders, and operates a distribution company called Sharing Machine. Dog Traders released a full-length album entitled A Panic in a Pagoda and a split single with Looper that contained the songs "evil seeds" and "expertly configured" .
I'm just wondering what is Dog Traders then? It is/was a group of people who, in part, wrote, recorded, released, and performed music. Is that not a band? --Jlencion 15:26, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Dog Traders

message: Should it be included in his projects?
http://drew.corrupt.net/bp/ —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 201.81.51.152 (talk) 18:55, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lego Porn 

message: His facebook profile is listed as Drew Fairweather, as seen here.  Assuming that's actually him, that might be his real last name (important to note since even his published books have just been listed as "by Drew" )  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bclare (talk • contribs) 22:57, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  last name
Talk:List of newspapers in Wisconsin

message: This list now contains all but one newspaper listed in the 2005-2006 Wisconsin Blue Book under the section of Daily Newspapers on page 787.  At this point, I have not added the missing newspaper--The Daily Reporter of Milwaukee--since it lists itself as "Wisconsin's Construction, Law and Public Record Authority"--or a specialty newspaper.  Given this, can we consider this a complete list of Wisconsin daily newspapers? --Andymarek 19:17, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Complete List? 

message: Currently, the List of newspapers in Wisconsin contains only a listing of Wisconsin daily newspapers.  The name of the list implies a more encompassing and complete list of Wisconsin newspapers.  As such, I propose merging List of Wisconsin weekly newspapers into List of newspapers in Wisconsin.  Also, if merged, I would like to see the pages displayed more similarly to other state lists of newspapers (possibly like Iowa or Illinois). Andymarek 18:43, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Andy, see what I've done over at List of newspapers in Rhode Island -- I did the same for all the New England states as well as List of newspapers in New York. I agree with you that the weeklies should be on this page (which would obviate the need for the other page). By playing games with transclusion, though, we can put only the dailies on the List of newspapers in the United States page, along with a link to weeklies. I'm willing to do the gruntwork on this, if nobody objects within a week or two. ``` W i k i W i s t a h ``` 15:59, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Wisconsin Daily and Weekly Newspapers 

message: I fixed the sorting issues for papers starting with "The" and made the external links references vice links.
The table probably should include a column for publication frequency and founding date.   Most state lists do this.  A circulation column is also used in some state lists, but should be referenced to show the date of the circulation numbers.  Is there a Wisconsin newspaper association?   Founding date often appears on the newspaper or can be found in the Library of Congress database. 
User:G._Moore Talk  00:22, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestions
Talk:WKKV-FM

message: "Jam4Peace"
I wonder if it is worth mentioning that the "Jam4Peace" concert is notorious for its outbreaks of violence? 70.94.8.157 11:37, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:WMIL-FM

message: I did a little research, thanks to David Gleason's archive of Broadcasting Yearbooks and magazines. Couldn't find anything about them being silent, though, so I did the best I could. Anyone know about this situation? --Fightingirish (talk) 12:40, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Anyone have anything to add?
Talk:Surf ski

message: I'm inclined to merge this article and Surfski to a title of Surf ski.  Google returns twice as many hits for "surf ski" as for "surfski", and the plural title of the present article seems wrong.  Any other thoughts? -- Mwanner | Talk 14:30, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Kayak surfing is distinct from Surf skis as one is a sit on-top and the other is a closed cockpit kayak.  Despite the similarity to the casual onlooker they are very different craft and require different (although similar) skills and designs.
:For that matter, surf skis and sit-on-top kayaks are also different.  When I have some time, I will add a section about kayaks.  Jzerocsk 18:46, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Surf Skis are not Surf kayaks! 

message: Yondario (talk) 23:33, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Let me put your information in ymy language 

message: I removed a recently added reference for two reasons:
* From what I could tell, it was supporting the same text as an existing reference.  This needlessly expands the list of references without adding any benefit.
* The name of the URL suggested that the only or at least primary purpose of adding the link was ... to add that particular link.  That's called "linkspam" or "reference spam."
There are large areas in this article that are not referenced.  Many of them are things that readers will take for granted or accept as "common knowledge."  These do not need citations.  Other sections, like the "Characteristics" section, really should have at least one reference that backs up the major elements discussed in that section.  If more than one reference is needed that is okay, but if an editor can find a single reliable source, preferably one not associated with this industry, that describes the elements in this section with enough detail that readers aren't left wondering "did someone make this text up out of their imagination, or is this a real thing" that would be very beneficial.
I haven't taken the time to scan the rest of the article today, but there are probably similar sections, paragraphs, or sentences where a reader might wonder "is this really true or is someone messing with Wikipedia?"  These are the parts of the article that need to be backed up by a reliable-source reference, preferably one that is independent of the subject it covers.  davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 🎄 16:27, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional sources
Talk:WGBA-TV

message: The article mentions MeTV is gone even though I am watching MeTV right now. I don't think we should mention MeTV's discontinuation until MeTV is completely discontinued. 2603:6000:9803:A062:C090:C410:6EEE:BA36 (talk) 21:46, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  MeTV still on the air (for now).
Talk:Monster (disambiguation)

message: He's a monster too!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.235.64.248 (talk) 04:00, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Flying Spaghetti Monster

message: I removed the split-tag since no one's commented on it at all since it was added September, 2006. I personally don't think this article should be split since there are only two cases of "monstrosity" on the list, not enough for their own disambiguation page. If someone disagrees they can add the tag back. Tocharianne 03:33, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split 

message: Of the people who visit http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/monster, how many really are meaning to look up monster.com?
71.166.169.68 (talk) 18:15, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: We can't know for sure, but probably not many. According to this website, in June 2010 (the most recent month with full statistics), 49,303 people viewed Monster and 2,015 people viewed Monster.com. Propaniac (talk) 18:50, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  A random question 

message: I'd heard that song writers create a monster: a word salad framework containing the verbal stress pattern of a new song, before substituting meaningful words into it. I'm trying to research it, and I'd like to write an article [[Monster lyrical framework) Is anyone else familiar with it? samwaltz (talk) 21:55, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Lyrical framework
Talk:Belgian Blue

message: I understand that the myostatin gene is mutated in one way or the other so the normal inhibitory effect on muscle growth is not done. But why do the muscles still stop growing eventually? The article should explain this. The only net difference that I can see is that these cows look like hulks but still like cows. It's not as if they lost all control over muscle growth clearly, as otherwise their muscles would never stop growing. The article should also explain this or at the least add to explanations why the hulk-cow is that big but not bigger. 2A02:8388:1641:4700:BE5F:F4FF:FECD:7CB2 (talk) 11:06, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genetic / Cellbiology related explanation 

message: how i can devlope my charolais muscle like belgianblue Mohammad arshad dhanchora (talk) 15:24, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  How i can devlop a charolais muscle in to belgian blue please
Talk:Timewyrm: Genesys

message: Isn't the cover blurb copyright? Angmering 18:04, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is. Is the version we have now verbatim (my copy's lost so I can't check)? If it is, can someone change it? --khaosworks (talk • contribs) 22:45, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Tim! changed it since I posted here, so that's okay now. I'll change any future ones I spot myself now I have clarification. Angmering 22:48, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Blurb
Talk:Dead Alewives

message: Many reference links are dead or point to unmaintained web sites.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aaronsjunk (talk • contribs) 02:04, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I've attempted to remove the POV advertising language of the article. --InShaneee 21:47, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Pretty good, this seems subjective: The Dead Alewives approached widespread recognition many times, but never seemed to enjoy the push that would launch them to national prominence.
I get what its trying to say, but again its not as objective as it should be. It sounds more like a snippet off the back of a biography. --Crossmr 22:41, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I suppose, but couldn't think of a better way to word it. --InShaneee 06:06, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup, pov, references 

message: I remember that the original Summoner animation was actually a promo for an animation utility.  It was to help sync the characters' mouths with recorded speech.  The idea was that the cartoons would lip-sync to the Dead Alewives.  Does anybody remember the name of the utility?  I don't see a reference to it on the Volition Web site.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.111.197.98 (talk) 22:27, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Animation Utility? 

message: "Is a featured performer on MadTV" MadTV is no longer on.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.187.5.4 (talk) 18:33, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I fixed that one, but most of the article needs updating badly. --Orange Mike  |  Talk 20:17, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Mad TV
Talk:Mizizios

message: Is Mzhezh same as Mezezius. There is contradictory sources on the topic suggesting the one died decades before, but name is similiar and also uncommon. Mjej Gnuni (talk) 22:26, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Apparently not. The two people named "Mzezh" acted with an interval of several decades, and it is hard to believe that a man who was general in the 630s would still be active 30 years later. At any rate, the Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium does not mention anything about the previous Mzezh, and mentions Mezezius solely as the general of Sicily and usurper. Constantine   ✍  22:41, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mzhezh = Mezezius?
Talk:Airline Tycoon

message: I've gone through the article and modified its contents to third person. Also fixed a few grammatical errors.
Kelly 14:54, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup
Talk:Five Points, Denver

message: Darrent was not killed in Five Points. I am deleting this. He was killed at 11th and Speer, which is within the Golden Triangle of Denver. 69.15.176.66 17:23, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Darrent Williams 

message: "Among Denver residents, Five points has long been perceived as a haven for drug dealing, crime, poverty, prostitution, and gang violence, along with several other areas in East Denver. It is debatable whether such perceptions were ever truly based in reality or were merely stereotypes fostered by misconceptions of Five Points' predominantly minority population. With the demographics of the neighborhood now having undergone such a dramatic shift, this argument is confined to a recollection of an earlier time, for better or for worse."
This is biased... Simply look at crime statistics for the area and, while it is undergoing many much needed changes, the crime reports prove to the contrary of this hapless individuals attempt to blame his unfortunate position in society on "stereotypes fostered by misconceptions of... [the] minority population." How do I dispute this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by DerbyHound (talk • contribs) 01:40, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biased  

message: Hello, I noticed that some sentences in the section "Five Points Jazz Festival" is copied from the webpage:https://www.artsandvenuesdenver.com/programs/five-points-jazz-festival. Could someone help resolve the copyright problem on the page? Thanks! shuuji3 (talk) 07:07, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright issue found
Talk:Carlos Menditeguy

message: Is this Carlos Mendeteguy really also the one that played polo? There were a Carlos E. Menditeguy and a Carlos M. Menditeguy during the 40s and 50s (this guys have the bad habit of naming their kids after themselves) and we might be mixing them! I haven' tbeen able to find any reference to Carlos Alberto Mendeteguy playing polo. Mariano(t/c) 14:57, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Steve Small in the F1 drivers' "Who's Who" says it's the same guy :) Bretonbanquet (talk) 22:57, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Roy Gordon Lawrence (second nomination)

message: *THANKS,Andyru now it just goes to show who is realy trying to make this page a soapbox. you!look at all of your entries. They are all of william01! Move on! you can try to protect you friend Roy Lawrence, but people should know of his past! I have kids and I am thankfull of this page as it informs us about possible threats to our kids. You worry me andyru,that you are so dead set on hidding his past,,do you have kids??? 70.26.46.45 18:17, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jugementonyou or 70.26.46.45 / Andyru 

message: ** Dear "Sunbirdinc" - read what I put in the nomination at the top.  Read the 3 links, you'll quickly see that there is a agenda to NOT keep articles dear to Williamo1's heart neutral.  Did you read all the comments about Williamo1 on the 3 pages (made by neutral Wikipedia people)? And now that Williamo1 is using sock/meatpuppets... Andyru 14:26, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  SunbirdInc / Andyru
Talk:John Carroll (disambiguation)

message: _ _ Contrary to what i expected from talk:John Carroll (priest), i see no sign of a 19th-century British astronomer (and every indication that the bishop out-Googles the 20th-century British astronomer). If the bishop were subordinate to any of the others, the rdr to him would be a mistake. An equal Dab'n will certainly do for the time being. (And no admin would be needed to reverse the move from John Carroll (disambiguation) to John Carroll.) 
_ _ If the other stargazer turns up, his entry can be de-commented.--Jerzy•t 15:02, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Jeff Cohen (media critic)

message: I'm removing "left-leaning" as a description of FAIR. While it does advocate more left-wing views in the media, it does this in order to counteract a perceived right-wing bias. FAIR views itself as unbiased (i.e., not left-leaning or right-leaning) and a watchdog of a media that it has found to be too conservative. Describing it as left-leaning is not NPOV as that is only a perception of them and their actions: I imagine FAIR would argue that if the media was too left-wing they would press for right-wing views. It is, of course, a matter of debate as to whether that's true. JF Mephisto 15:06, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled