lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Port of Shanghai

message: There is a contradiction in this article with the article on the Port of Singapore.  I have noted this contradiction on the talk page of the article on the Port of Singapore.
Stephen.G.McAteer (talk) 07:27, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction with other page 

message: If one counts the number of TEU's visible in this photograph(http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/10/29/article-2478975-190E5F8300000578-851_964x590.jpg) (approximately 80,000). And one uses the numbers presented by the cited articles (~33 million TEU annually). Then the port of Shanghai must move (33,000,000/365 = 90,410.9589) 90,411 TEU daily. Or approximately the number of TEU visible in this photo. They simply do not have the crane, dock, or trucking capacity to do this. Please present proof that these presented calculations are incorrect.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.49.251.155 (talk) 22:11, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible overstated tonnage and TEU numbers 

message: I replaced the term "Far East" with "East Asia", per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Far_East, which describes the former as deprecated, archaic and Eurocentric. Dgndenver (talk) 15:48, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Far East
Talk:Harman v. Forssenius

message: the article correctly cites the opinion as saying
"the poll tax is abolished absolutely as a prerequisite to voting, and no equivalent or milder substitute may be imposed."[2]
however, in crawford v marion county, the court did approve a milder substitute. crawford was a voter ID case. in order to vote, indiana residents first have to buy documents, such as a birth certificate, driver's license, or passport. it functions as a poll tax. no 24th amendment claim was before the court. the court split 3-3-3, with the prevaling opinion saying, well this time you didnt have enough evidence, but feel free to come back later when you have some. my guess is that as the court has gotten more conservative, plaintiffs will lose even if they have the evidence there were missing in crawford.
wikipedia is missing any followup to this case. i made similar remarks under the 24th amendment article.
robbin stewart 8/21 137.26.39.74 (talk) 23:46, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  crawford v marion county, voter ID
Talk:Leftwich Trophy

message: I don't understand this article. Looking at the table for 2005, I find the winner was Captain John W. Maloney (deceased), but on looking at the photo I find Captain Bronzi being presented with the trophy in 2005. Was Bronzi presented with the trophy in lieu of Maloney? Was Bronzi erroneously presented with the trophy? Is the table wrong? Is the photo incorrectly captioned? Could somebody please explain or better still, sort the article out. RASAM (talk) 21:31, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Confusion
Talk:Joe Winkelsas

message: Joe is not retired.  He is currently in camp with the White Sox!
~anonymous 6:26 CST  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.147.9.196 (talk) 00:27, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right. I have chaned the infobox to reflect his active status. Someone, with more knowledge about him, might want to change/add to the last sentence that talks about his retirement after 2006. -NatureBoyMD (talk) 00:47, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Retired?
Talk:Lonaconing, Maryland

message: Lonaconing has lost more than half its population since 1940 -- why?
Surely the article should address this. Kestenbaum (talk) 04:09, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population decline? 
Talk:Twilight (Buffy comic)

message: Removed "plans to kill Buffy" as I don't believe that he states that that is specifically part of his plans. -Mike  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.244.31.176 (talk) 23:54, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits 

message: Tagging this for notability and references is accurate, but premature.  Material featuring this fictional character is currently being published; expect academic discussion, suitable for references, to follow later.  While Buffy the Vampire Slayer has spawned many secondary references over the years, they have never been as contemporaneous as our esteemed Wikipedia editors who have noted their absence in this case. Jclemens (talk) 05:12, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Why is the tag premature? It simply reflects that the article as it stands does not have secondary sources and hasn't met the requirements of WP:FICTION.--Fabrictramp (talk) 16:54, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If you're looking at it that way, and no one's proposing deletion on theose bases, no harm done.  On the other hand, there's simply no way this article could meet those standards yet, so the tagging won't serve any immediate purpose to motivate editors to contribute, since there's not yet anything sufficient for them to reference. Jclemens (talk) 03:31, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

text: Ok, I've done some more work.  We have NINE cites now: three primary source, four of non-blog industry sites(Follow the TV Guide link to see what's there: an editorial conversation starter, rather than user-generated content) and two from reviewed/edited sites. So I'm once again believing in good faith that we have enough to meet the notability and verification requirements of WP:FICTION and going to remove the tags again.  Jclemens (talk) 23:30, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability and References 

message: Under character history is says - He later says, "I know that move, Slayer."  I was wondering if it would make sense to say something else as to the context of the statement.  Specifically, he's referring to her move of bisecting an opponent with the scythe by thrusting up from the crotch.  Twilight stops the scythe and says the line.  That is apparently a direct reference to her using the exact move against Caleb which Angel nearly witnessed as he was about to get back up and fight Caleb himself in the season 7 finale.  So the relevance of the statement to his character reveal would seem... well academic.  Concur?  However, I didn't want to jump in and edit the article itself without prior discussion. Medleystudios72 (talk) 07:41, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: "The move" - a case for further explanation?
Talk:Tortilicaulis

message: As per Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Plants#Classifications_for_extant_versus_extinct_plants, it's far from clear  at present how to classify extinct plants. I'm currently working on articles in this area, and will seek comments and consensus at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Plants when I'm a bit clearer on the issues. Peter coxhead (talk) 11:35, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Classification
Talk:List of political scandals in Italy

message: This article in npov.--Rombaldyszx (talk) 20:50, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 02:48, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]]
Talk:Hancock, Maryland

message: The article reads:
The north-south distance from the Pennsylvania state line to the West Virginia state line is only 1.8 miles (2.9 km) from Hancock.
I could write a paragraph explaining that I think this should be 
*The north-south distance from the Pennsylvania state line to the West Virginia state line is only 1.8 miles (2.9 km) at Hancock., or
*The north-south distance from the Pennsylvania state line to the West Virginia state line is only 1.8 miles (2.9 km) through Hancock.
But I'm not going to, because I think a simple reading of the current version clearly makes no sense.  I'm going to go ahead and change it. Unschool 22:48, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nonsense or nongrammatical sentence.
Talk:Funkstown, Maryland

message: Is the "did you know..." section standard practice?  I have never seen it before.  I suggest that we change to it to "interesting facts or something. --InformationContributor11 (talk) 12:05, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The reason you probably never seen this done before is because most of the history section is a word-for-word copy and paste from the history page of the official website. See , editor even left the titles as they appear on the site. Wouldn't this be copyrighted material? Cmr08 (talk) 06:44, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Standard Practice? 
Talk:Catoctin Trail

message: The proper name should be:
Catoctin National Recreation Trail
--Eplack (talk) 17:37, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed the name of the trail in the article to reflect its status as a NRT, I suggest moving the     page to Catoctin National Recreation Trail Arbogastlw (talk) 14:24, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs to be renamed
Category talk:College football rivalries in the United States

message: is there any way these articles can have a consistent format with the fair use of logos? However it is done, it would be nice to go through and enjoy this section . . . I prefer logos without "thumb" boxes, but I have run into issues with Betacmmand and others constantly deleting logos, especially when not in a thumbbox. what gives?12.41.183.194 (talk) 05:01, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of bassoonists

message: *** Names on the bassoon page ***
Wow! Me first entry in talk page! I've noticed there's a bunch of bassoonists listed at the bottom of the bassoon page, some of whom are listed here and some of whom are not. Similarly, some of the names here are not in that list, and perhaps are worth including. My question is, given the redundancy or overlap between the two lists, should the list at the bottom of the bassoon article be removed and the names from there added here?
:Too a certain extent yes. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 16:10, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

message: I removed the following red links, Norman Herzberg (1916–2007) , Kelley Kroft, Anthony Kuhlmann, Saxton Rose, Charles Ullery, Russell Oates, Ivan Eroed, David Seidel, Milan Turković, Dietmar Zeman, Janet Bloxwich, Sarah Burnett, David Chatterton, David Chatwin, Mike Cole, Bill Douglas, Deirdre Dundas-Grant, Rachel Gough, Ursula Leveaux, Nicholas Reader, Julian Roberts, Graham Sheen, Philip Turbett, Alan Warhurst, Gunter Piesk,  Sergio Azzolini, Stefano Canuti, Corrado Dabbene, Roberto Giaccaglia, Gian Luca Reverberi, Eliseo Smordoni, Stefano Vicentini, Dag Jensen, Tracy McGinnis, Esteban Falconi, Gustavo Núñez, as it's impossible to tell if they are bassoonists or not without some sources. With that many red links it's also hard to tell if they are noted for their bassoon playing or are like Madonna Wayne Gacy and Beverly Hanson.
I also removed David Hubbard who was a U.S. Representative and Julie Price that redirects to Julie Arthur wife of the Prime Minister of Barbados.
British/Irish bassoonists can't be mixed together as they are two seperate countries. France and Germany are not mixed together, so why British/Irish? Americans are now at United States and the others are listed as countries. Americans can refer to anyone who lives in the Americas and not just residents of the US.
I replaced the "more sources" tag with a single "fact tag" for Paul Hindemith who composed works for the bassoon but does not appear to have played it.
Finally I was able to find several people who were missing from the list and were not included in a bassoon category. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 01:18, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Tidy

message: Hi y'all, I transferred over the list of bassoon players from the main bassoon page to this page since I found that they would fit in better on this page. If y'all have any questions or concerns, please just let me know. Thanks! UnfoldingWords (talk) 04:19, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  List Transfer from Bassoon Mainpage
Talk:Ruby Princess

message: In the first line of the text, change Crown-class cruise ship to Grand-class cruise ship. Gazmoore2 (talk) 23:18, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 7 April 2020: Opening sentence should read:  

message: pls update on the lead as it was updated only in the bottom section, there were additional 2 deaths and the total now is 18.https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-04-13/coronavirus-concerns-for-international-ruby-princess-passengers/12143544
 Schwede66 01:01, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 13 April 2020 

message: Although the section 'Special Commission of enquiry' mentions that a report was published, there is no summary of the findings. Surely this should be added? I have read the report (320 pages long!) but admit its beyond my capabilities to do this, perhaps somebody who is more experienced in reading government reports will be able to. No disrespect but I found it overly padded and waffling, lots of minute details and lots of names mentioned, but no concise summary of what happened. Logicman1966 (talk) 13:23, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Summary of Report? 

message: The page is edit-protected for some reason so I can't edit, but hopefully someone who can will add a section on the Conspira-Sea cruise from 2016. The ship hosted an event full of conspiracy theorists and one even got arrested by the IRS at the end of it:
86.133.221.10 (talk) 00:01, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conspira-Sea
Talk:Sexual innuendo

message: "Sexual innuendo is a hard topic to stay on top of. As a humor tool, it stands erect in the English language. While there are no hard and fast rules as to what constitutes sexual innuendo, there have been many mass debates on the topic, and now the general principles at the root of the topic are firm and well-rounded. However, full penetration of the subject requires that the reader take a long, hard look at the target and be a cunning linguist in order to avoid limp phrases and imbibe the phrase with a large handful of meanings. As well as the language changes innuendos must change in order to fill the newly created holes and satisfy listeners.
A common problem with sexual innuendo is the recipient being unable to wrap their hands around the intended meaning. In this case, an individual using sexual innuendo will often start slow and eventually build up, increasing depth more and more until the recipient feels the actual thrust of the point and the innuendo climaxes. An innuendo is always the most pleasing when no one sees it coming, often by entering the mind through the rear. Some skilled people are even able to use several sexual innuendos quickly in succession, resulting in multiple innuendo-esque climaxes. Key phrases can grasp the sentence by the ankles and part its long clauses allowing the orator to penetrate the essence of the sentence. In this regard, the key is to avoid stiff, rigid words, for ones that give the meaning of the sentence a firm rise in innuendic possibilities. Some regard sexual innuendo as an art form, and it goes without saying that one needs a certain level of oral skills in order for the fluidic exchange of innuendo to succeed. However, this is not enough to fill her requirements. One needs to pay special attention to the region of the sentence to which the innuendo will enter. For lasting effects, it is most important to enter deep within the recipient's consciousness and to ensure that all of the seeds of humor have flowed forth. This is not an easy task for most people, so it is only through rigorous repetition of the insertion of sexual innuendo that one can fully master the uplifting effects it can have on vocabulary.
Although sexual innuendo requires masterful manipulation of parts of speech (and sometimes the skillful use of body language), for most people it comes quickly."
As of 01-25-08, funny and nice edit! Keep this here, as it will be reverted. Travis (talk) 05:17, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sometimes I wish we still had WP:BJAODN... :) Terraxos (talk) 17:29, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Grand-class cruise ship

message: Can anyone offer a better title for this article which covers not only the Grand Class but three other classes derived from it? -- Timberframe (talk) 15:33, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title 

message: As everyone know that the Grand class cruise ships have an unorthodox design, specially the placement of its elements. The staggered rows of balcony staterooms, oblique funnel and spoiler aft proves to be the unconventional elements of these ships.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaypeepacres (talk • contribs) 08:21, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Grand Class design
Talk:Thomas Trueblood

message: This article was viewed over 6,800 times in two days after it appeared on DYK in Jan. 2008.Cbl62 (talk) 22:36, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article passes the main elements of good article review.  I have a few concerns.
"At the turn of the century, speech and oratory still played a prominent role in American academia."   I have linked to the source and also modified the phrase to clarify the basis for the statement.  Cbl62 (talk) 00:51, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Because of uncertainty as to whether the locomotive cheer was invented by Trueblood or others at Princeton, I do not think this appropriately belongs in the lead.  Cbl62 (talk) 00:52, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a good enough reason for me.User:calbear22 (talk) 07:37, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

text: If I may add one thing, I think consistency with either "UM" or "U-M" is needed. And whichever way you go, it should be explained in parentheses the first time the university is mentioned. For example, "the first coach of the University of Michigan (UM) golf and debate teams."  - The only remaining U-M is in a direct quote.  Cbl62 (talk) 00:41, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: GA hold
File talk:Wild Boar Habbitat 3.jpg

message: Congratulations....good photo.  TableMannersC·U·T 05:36, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed!  I would, however, like to see "habitat" spelled right in the name.  :)  --pie4all88 (talk) 23:46, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
Talk:SS Amerikanis

message: Changed paragraph "Conversion and cruising career": X is the Greek letter "Chi", there is no "C" in the Greek alphabet.
Unfortunately I don't think that there is a sound for Chi in the English language, so I could not provide an example for pronouncation.Dafalias (talk) 23:12, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: How can I find out how long did my dad work on the ship 2600:387:A:9C2:0:0:0:47 (talk) 15:25, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  My dad died
Talk:MV Island Star

message: The statement...
"This "cheap and cheerful" approach tends to attract those of limited budgets who have not cruised before-which could deter those experienced cruisers who have more discerning tastes."
...is inaccuate, snobbish and gives a totally incorrect impression of the Island Star!
I cruise on a regular basis on the Island Star and meet people from all walks of life including some very wealthy passengers who, like me, enjoy the informality that the ship offers. Phimo (talk) 14:48, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
Talk:La Malbaie

message: Hello,I am negotiating the purchase of the wreck LE Pzelican down in Louisiana for transport from there to Florida for restoration.I am looking for any information one might have about it's construction,and its blueprints.I am also looking for information on Stewart Mcdonald who built it.Any information would be a great help..Best Regards, --Sapmut (talk) 06:17, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:1951 Gold Coast general election

message: 1951 General election 154.160.21.223 (talk) 17:01, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:Aqraba, Nablus

message: Sharon, 1997, p.  110 says that Aqraba is not mentioned in the Bible, but this website say  "MA'ALEH AKRABBIM" is. I´m removing it from the article. Huldra (talk) 22:20, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Sharon's obviously wrong or took the confusion over the placename Akrabbim as an indication that it never meant this location. Seems specious in light of Josephus and Eusebius. — LlywelynII 09:16, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mentioned in the Bible?  

message: Its only source that report this.It shouldn't be in the lead and I am pretty certain it should in the article at all. --Shrike (talk) 11:15, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe you ought to look harder, if it's too difficult, I'll do it for you. Selfstudier (talk) 12:16, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I added another source. Do you need any more? Selfstudier (talk) 14:53, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Various fringe sources not really a source.What make Kerem Navot a WP:RS and WP:DUE? Shrike (talk) 15:29, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Moving the goal posts? Your complaint was that there was only one source, now there are two. (and as I pointed out in the edit summary, ARIJ is used in all the West Bank village articles, its just that you don't like that).Selfstudier (talk) 16:39, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

text: Here is the exact same report being cited in a scholarly rsSelfstudier (talk) 16:46, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  ARIJ in the lead
Talk:Thorolf Rafto Memorial Prize

message: Many of the prizewinners are persecuted by the governments ruling the country where they live.  Their governments certainly don't consider them as representatives for their countries.  Is it appropriate to use the flags of countries of prizewinners for this article? They serve no purpose other than decoration. I will remove the flags in this article unless anyone have a reasonable objection. DHN (talk) 17:43, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Appropriateness of flags
Talk:Bubble ring

message: Uh, why poloidal instead of toroidal?
65.255.211.130 (talk) 22:35, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The difference is explained in toroidal and poloidal. --Epipelagic (talk) 23:00, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed the direction of rotation is poloidal, but the mathematical shape (assuming perfection) is still a toroid.  --Wally Tharg (talk) 10:15, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Why poloidal

message: This should definitely be a separate page, instead of an addition to the bottom. ShadowPhox (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Other uses of the term

message: This gif of a diver blowing a ring seems useful. Unfortunately, I can't figure out how to make it repeat, with a pause so it's not annoying. If anyone has the necessary skills, this might be a good image for the page. - Featous (talk) 01:04, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  gif