lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ole Kirk Christiansen

message: Ole Kirk Kristiansen was an inventor who developed LEGO. He was very smart because he developed a toy that children could play with.
My name is Mitch richardson and i am in 8th grade doing a project on inventors.
----
I merged in this strange sub-part of the article as I found it oddly written and not verified:
Kristiansen was born in Fliskov, Denmark. Kristiansen made a living as carpenter, and he built houses and furniture in Billund, Denmark. In 1932 the stupid man, he decided to switch from carpenter to toy maker. In Denmark then there was a depression. His first wooden toys were miniature versions of the houses and furniture. Later, in 1947 he was the first to make toys with plastic. In 1949 he had over 200 plastic and wooden toys. Lego is made from “Leg” and “Godt” which, in Danish means, “Play well.” Lego in Latin means, “I put together.”
62.189.191.42 (talk) 10:50, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've reverted this edit by an anon with a perfect history of pure vandalism, this being their only edit in any doubt and not already reverted.
It's a bit hard to know whether online sources are just repeating information from Wikipedia (remembering that they don't need to attribute our information, only our text if they use it) but
* http://astrumpeople.com/ole-kirk-christiansen-biography-amazing-history-of-lego-company/
* http://web.mit.edu/invent/iow/christiansen.html
both give the date as 7 April 1891. Andrewa (talk) 00:12, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  DOB 

message: I am doing a project for school, and I found almost no info. Please improve this article! thank you. 50.49.143.45 (talk) 23:42, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Not Helpful

message: This article does not use an encyclopaedic tone, and reads as if written by someone connected with the subject. It needs serious work to comply with the WP:NPOV core policy. 46.208.152.48 (talk) 08:53, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major issues
Talk:NUL

message: Revision as of 17:59, 19 September 2002 User:129.132.73.141
 	#REDIRECT Null
Revision as of 22:16, 14 December 2005 User:Webmaster Pete
:This is the direct acronym of the National Urban League, and therefore, is best used for that instead of a typo/other spelling redirect.
 	#REDIRECT National Urban League
----
I created the separate NUL (disambiguation) page which I now wanted to move here, but since this did not work, I redirect to it. — MFH:Talk 19:36, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: previous versions

message: I wanted to make the move, and as this didn't succeed, I posted a "move request" -- but finally, maybe it's better as it is now?
Since on one hand, the NUL (disambiguation) page merits exactly this name, and one could imagine that in the future, a page would be written for something which is really called NUL (like e.g. the nonprintable ASCII character...) so that it would be justified to start the page like
 "This page is about NUL, the xxx.
  For other uses of NUL, especially as acronym or initialism, see NUL (disambiguation)."
So I'll leave the decision to the people who have more power and a better sense for judgement than me... — MFH:Talk 20:30, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  better leave as is ?
Talk:Epydoc

message: The article says: "Epydoc also supports viewing the rendered docstrings within Python using a GUI."  Can somebody explain this?  In the Epydoc docs, it shows how to use a simple Epydoc GUI to choose what to document, and with what options, but I see nothing about viewing the rendered docstrings within a Python GUI. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.76.32.23 (talk) 19:39, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Abraham Acton

message: States in the piece that the first wounded soldier had laid against the enemy trenches for 75 hours.
The Wiki page of James Alexander Smith, Acton's co-rescuer, says it was 15 hours.
I don't know which statement is true and which an error. 80.3.108.32 (talk) 18:27, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  First rescue
Talk:Monster's Ball match

message: In the first Monster's Ball description, it states that the character observing the match was James Mitchell...  Mitchell was never used in such role, and other than the one voiceover promo, was never under the hood during the hooded man's 3 appearances.  Mitchell was only brought in as Abyss' manager after Slammiversary, where he begged Abyss for a chance.  Its not the same, and the reference probably should be removed....  Clint 15:34, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Mitchell Reference

message: On tnawrestling.com, it says that the fith monsters ball match on this page was monsters ball 3. This must mean that they do not count the house shows, and neither should we. I'm removing them now. Rhys 49 11:39, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: House Shows?

message: Given that a match features monsters (plural), is the apostrophe in the wrong place? or is this a case of Pro-wrestling defining something inaccurately, but because it's an official name, we have to stick with it? --Dave. 20:24, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apostrophe
Talk:XCF (file format)

message: The compatibility described seems to be Forward compatibility rather than backward. Someone who has a better grasp of what the GIMP actually does should check this. -- 84.135.65.205 (talk) 12:46, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Furthermore, Gimp 2.6 cannot open Gimp 2.7 Images by now, if layer groups are used 85.180.66.89 (talk) 10:01, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've made a correction in this respect which probably addresses this. --pgimeno (talk) 21:03, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Compatibility 

message: XCF is also the name of a programmer project file format used by Lattice Semiconductor, written in an XML dialect. These files contain a reference to the programmer use, to the device to be programmed, and to the image (bitstream) file to be downloaded. There does not appear to be any public description for them though. --Dl8dtl (talk) 20:51, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not even mentioned on the Lattice Semiconductor page, so I'd say it doesn't reach notability. I couldn't find it in a quick Google, though I did pass by a motorcycle model and a Mexican trucking company. Manys (talk) 18:21, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  More Disambiguation Needed
Talk:International Students' Day

message: I hope the students who celebrate this day have better English skills than whoever decided to redirect this article away from the correctly spelt "International Students' Day" to the incorrect "International Students Day".  An apostrophe belongs after the last s of student.  194.73.118.78 19:43, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: the Nazis were fanatics about record keeping but I don't think they would kill people AND send them to concentration camps, at least not in that order. --2607:FEA8:FF01:4B63:A1EA:71A2:159A:413F (talk) 04:11, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  prob killed or sent to camps
Talk:Resident Evil (disambiguation)

message: The hidden comment "do not enter game or film sequels covered in Resident Evil" (or similar) makes no sense for me as of 2019. I had no idea what this is, but was curious why folks stream some "resident evil 2" game plays on Twitch. Not expecting anything special I dropped the 2 in my search query, ending up on Resident Evil mumbling something about 1996 or 2002, apparently unrelated to what I want to know.Next attempt DAB (this page), still only ancient crap. After more than ten minutes I finally got that Resident Evil 2 used to be a "thing" (as of 1998) and that Resident Evil 2 (2019 video game) is the "real thing" as far as I'm concerned.I've ignored the hidden comment and added one line with two wikilinks (violating the common "one wikilink per entry" rule for DAB-pages):
:*Resident Evil 2 (2019 video game), a remake of the 1998 game Resident Evil 2.
Please invent a better rule for this page, e.g., permit a separate entry for Resident Evil 2, and unlink it in the Resident Evil 2 (2019 video game) entry. –84.46.52.103 (talk) 01:40, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing
Talk:Sonny Onoo

message: RandySavageFTW (talk) 03:27, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Note: Please provide a reason as to why you want to move the page.--S</font>RX</font> 13:18, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

text: Support SAVIOR_SELF.777 06:00, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Kazuo Onoo]] → [[Sonny Onoo]]
Talk:Seal of Milwaukee

message: I am guessing at some of the particulars of the seal, mainly the church and the factory. It looks like a church, but I'm not sure (likewise for the factory). I scoured the internet for information, but found none. --Fang Aili 19:56, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

message: I'm not sure if the seal of a city deserves its own article. Should this perhaps be merged into the Milwaukee, Wisconsin article? --mtz206 23:26, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge to main article? 
Talk:Naval Review

message: Unlinked references to naval/fleet review on USN ships' pages need to be AWB wiky-linked to here, and then used to increase this article. (For RN ships, wikify to Fleet Review, Royal Navy.) Neddyseagoon 19:57, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

message: According to :de:Columbian Naval Review which is based on  there were a lot more ships present, than listed here at Naval_Review#Grover_Cleveland. Regards, --Flominator (talk) 16:15, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The Columbian Naval Review was at New York, not Hampton Roads.Eregli bob (talk) 01:00, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Columbian Naval Review 

message: This article is incomplete - Naval reviews aren't exclusive to the USA. A naval review is winding up right now in Sydney, Australia. http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-10-06/deadly-wwi-naval-battle-remembered-in-sydney-service/5001376http://au.news.yahoo.com/a/19230151/prince-harry-in-sydney-as-international-fleet-review-kicks-off/http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/morning-express/morning-express-fleet-review-sails-into-sydney-20131004-2uxwj.htmlhttp://au.news.yahoo.com/a/19230151/prince-harry-leaves-sydney-as-international-fleet-review-continues/http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/latest-news/first-warships-enter-sydney-harbour/story-fn3dxiwe-1226732716156http://www.news.com.au/national-news/ships-steam-into-sydney-harbour-to-celebrate-the-navy8217s-centenary-fleet-review/story-fncynjr2-1226731748795
===References===
Please take steps to fix this article. Wiki ian 12:11, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Australian Naval Review

message: Please take steps to fix this article. Wiki ian 12:11, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Category talk:Game show hosts

message: There are some hosts who aren't mentioned, and should be mentioned. Here are my following suggestions:
*Bob Barker (retired)
*Pat Sajak
*Vanna White
*Alex Trebek
*Drew Carey
*Monty Hall
*Todd Newton
*Regis Philbin
*Meredith Viera
*Bert Convy
*Howie Mandel
*Allen Ludden
*Tom Kennedy
*Jack Narz
*Jeff Foxworthy
If anybody else knows more to be added to the article, please respond to my statement.--Tomballguy (talk) 00:47, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  List incomplete
Talk:A-1 (wrestler)

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Jreferee 19:14, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:James Maybrick

message: In the article, Michael Barrett shows up in the very last paragraph -- who is he, and in what connection is he to Maybrick?
A little introduction would be nice... -- Syzygy 20:06, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Barnett doesn't own the diary. He sold it (not just the rights to the story but also the physical item) to the publisher. Victrix 02:38, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who is Michael Barrett? 

message: Is the Robert Smith reffered to in the article as the current owner the same Robert Smith who is lead singer of the Cure? 138.217.179.154 23:32, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Current Owner

message: Information in this article referring to the death of James Maybrick conflicts with that in the article on Florence Maybrick - specifically the level of arsenic in the body - lethal or not.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.159.59.5 (talk) 13:44, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  conflicting information re death 

message: I found this article really confusing, because it goes through the items (journal and watch) and in both cases presents a fairly convincing case for why they may be genuine, but then closes by saying no serious scholars consider James Maybrick a possibility for the Ripper.  There's not really any information in the article right now that casts any doubt on it, though--if I was just sitting down to read this, I'd think this James Maybrick fellow must be the Ripper after all.  Would be good to have some info on here of why scholars think he's not a serious candidate.76.99.121.174 (talk) 11:22, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistent tone? 

message: History has not recorded whether or not Maybrick enjoyed Christmas, whether he ever carved a turkey or whether he was particularly proficient with a carving knife.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.175.85.221 (talk) 15:34, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccuracy and supposition
Talk:Cassidy O'Reilly

message: Are we sure he's a Cajun?  Can we find a source for this information?  I'm not saying he isn't a Cajun, but being born in Monroe and having O'Reilly as a last name suggests he might not be Cajun.
--Skb8721 16:22, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cajun? 
Talk:Ron Reis

message: Children shouldn't write wikipedia articles.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.144.82.125 (talk) 14:03, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Humping?
Talk:Peach Girl

message: I found it strange that those who wrote in about Sae were most upset about copying and not about the scheming, lying, and manipulation she does. She not only took the purse that Momo wanted but she talked Momo out of buying it, thus not only copying Momo, but dissuading Momo from the original decision. Hackwrench 20:12, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Strange

message: Image, please! --AAA! (talk • contribs) 01:55, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: Just to say, I've changed all the names back to normal. Kairi's not Kad anymore. :]
And I've taken away the part with Toji sacrificing himself because of Scandinavian issues or whatever. Weird0 10:16, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  someone messed around with the names. 

message: Text says 13 episodes, infobox says 20. Which is it? —Quasirandom 19:45, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Live-action episode count? 

message: Plot overview isn't good because it tell whole story, not just what it is about. It should be changed to what its about in general.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.210.145.2 (talk) 22:04, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spoilers 
Talk:Vintage base ball

message: This is my first attempt at page creation.  It's a little sparse now, I'll add more in the next few days.  Mestesso 20:12, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

message: I'm ordering it alphabetically, other than the VBBA link which will be at the top.  Mestesso 14:39, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links format 

message: It looks like this page should be Vintage base ball instead of Vintage Base Ball.  That is, it doesn't seem to be a proper name (and the intro paragraph itself uses the lowercase version).  I think this page should be moved. -- JHunterJ 20:52, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Capitalization

message: I understand that "baseball" used to be written as two words, and the Vintage Base Ball Association uses the two-word form, but the fact remains that the standard form of the word is "baseball", and people writing about vintage baseball without using the actual phrase "vintage baseball" will, no doubt, write it "baseball". Which should be the article title? - furrykef (Talk at me) 21:41, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Vintage base ball" or "Vintage baseball"? 

message: Does this article need names of clubs?  It gives external links to associations which no doubt have links to clubs, so are they necessary here?  Articles about football don't link to football clubs.  What is the criteria for inclusion? B1atv 06:53, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Names of clubs

message: Some of the terms in glossary are cricket terms (vintage or otherwise).  Should they link out? Hakluyt bean (talk) 04:00, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you give some examples? →Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots 04:29, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Vintage Cricket Ball
Talk:Steady, As She Goes

message: Why are there two videos for this song? PrettyMuchBryce 00:54, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Two Videos

message: :Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
*Support per policy, the wrong capitalization has no meaning. --Dhartung | Talk 11:45, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: Does anyone know whether the Raconteurs have anywhere acknowledged the song's ending as a riff on the last bars of "Toxic"?  Asat 11:22, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are you steady now? 

message: Is the song "steady as she goes", of Shellac, a cover of this song ? (ccursto (talk) 21:41, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  shellac's song ? 

message: Does anybody ... there must be a coverversion of "The bane rendition", sung by a female singer.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.158.227.62 (talk) 15:25, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  More coverversions
Talk:Southern Pacific 1518

message: What was it classified after ES615-2?
Was it a ES615R-1, ES615R-2, ES615R-3? What was it's final classification? 121.45.243.24 (talk) 22:56, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I DON'T KNOW I AM NOT DOING THE MATH HERE YOU CAN FORGET IT! 60.241.84.63 (talk) 06:35, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Final classification:
Talk:John "Grizzly" Adams

message: "born October 12, 1812 (according to his gravestone which also gives his first name as John) and died October 25, 1860, although many reports offer October 20, 1807 as his date of birth. (Correct if he was 53 when he died.)"
Something can't be right in this sentence, either even if 1807 should mean 1870, a death at 53 would be wrong (it would be 58 then, in the other case 48)
signed, 
      Saciel  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Saciel (talk • contribs) 20:13, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Lifetime

message: On Find-A-Grave he is named John Adams. Lincher 20:28, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: At first glance, the cause of his fatal head wound seems to be attributed to both The General and some monkey:
"Although never fatal, by the fourth time the General severely injured James Adams' head, it left his brain exposed.
Adams died at about 53 years of age of meningitis from the open head wound that resulted from an accident while training a monkey on tour with P.T. Barnum in 1860."
Are both of these injuries correct or only one?  This should be clarified at the least
198.175.55.6 (talk) 03:28, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Death discrepancy?

message: Moved to /First Proposed Revision
Also, see post under NAME heading 31 May 2011 -
I am a novice at making changes, so I need someone to help with posting this revision... please.
The Title of this article needs to be changed to match the real first name "John" - perhaps someone can create a new page and redirect this page to the new one? Whirlyguy (talk) 16:05, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed Revision

message: The whole article is repeated several times within itself.
It needs to be revised to remove the double and sometimes triple repetition of information, almost word for word at times.
Enderwigginau (talk) 11:38, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major Revision 

message: One starts (and keeps) reading the article as it is now, and at some point the article reads "However, Adams told Hittell, his hunting and trapping career ended abruptly". Ok but... who's that "Hittell"? That person is not mentioned before, so this makes few sense as it is at present. Kintaro (talk) 21:13, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who's Hittell?
Talk:Eastern barred bandicoot

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Perameles gunni.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on March 1, 2012. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2012-03-01. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! —howcheng  {chat} 17:54, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Perameles gunni.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon
Talk:Southern Pacific 2479

message: If anyone has a historical photo of this locomotive running, with the correct license please feel free to replace the info box photo, I can't find one  Grey3k (talk) 01:23, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

message: Is 2467 is gonna run again 2600:1700:E3F0:22D0:863:9220:BEAF:168C (talk) 01:32, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is 2467 will ever run again
Talk:Pig-footed bandicoot

message: Because they're currently listed as endangered on the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service TESS database (Threatened and Endangered Species System)...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.90.96.17 (talk) 13:09, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: CITES lists it as possibly extinct, the US ESA lists it as endangered, and the IUCN lists it as extint. We follow the IUCN for the most part in our taxoboxes. The last known specimen was taken in 1907. CITES and the US ESA are laws whose purpose is to protect species from becoming extinct. IUCN isn't a law, but a conservation organization whose job is to determine if a species is threatened with extinct or not, or if the species has become extinct. - UtherSRG (talk) 14:21, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are pig-footed bandicoots really extinct?  

message: The science mag link (^ http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2007/04/01-01.html) is an april fool's joke; none of the information in it should be used in this article. There was no 2007 expedition, it was a joke about evidence for the species appearing on youtube. Shrikethyrse (talk) 08:21, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Shame on us. LOL! Ok, I've removed it. - UtherSRG (talk) 15:10, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  April fool's joke link  
Talk:Lesser bilby

message: I recommend the species Bilby articles are merged with the main Bilby article. For a start, the species articles are stubs, and adding information from them would basically be repeating information placed on the main article. Following on from that, as the genus article covers only one species (as 1 out of 2 is extinct), it is practically a species page anyway, written with all the information that is found in a species article, based on one species (the Greater Bilby). Additionally, the search "Bilby" comes up with the Genus article, and I'm fairly sure most would expect it to result in the Greater Bilby page. 
Based on these reasons, I think the articles should be merged (I have copied this to all 3 bilby talk pages, to keep discussion on one page, please discuss on the genus talk page. Chipmunkdavis (talk) 17:19, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I hope I have managed to expand the Lesser Bilby article beyond a stub and to a point where merging it with the Greater Bilby Article would not be the best idea. While default search results should point to the surviving Greater Bilby species, the Lesser Bilby having a different distribution, behavior and diffrent species history should retain a page of his own. Wilhelm Klave (talk) 14:04, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Quite. I think the current article is much better, especially the extinction section. Thanks, Chipmunkdavis (talk) 14:44, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging of Bilby Articles 