Talk:Unfaithful (song)

message: Is it just me or the segments of this song sounds very similar to Rob Thomas's Lonely_No_More? Kenimaru 09:42, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Similarity 

message: I don't wanna be lonely no more
I don't wanna have to pay for this
I don't want to know the lover at my door
Is just another heartache on my list
I don't wanna be angry no more
You know I could never stand for this
So when you tell me that you love me know for sure
I don't want to be lonely anymore
*Don't get me wrong, both are good songs.
*To be honest, when you highlight the resemblance it doesn't sound similar at all. But the first time I heard the song, I thought it was a Rob Thomas cover. So I, totally, agree. PoorLeno 22:02, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lonely No More 

message: This is ridiculous...a lot of songs use lyrics that say "I dont wanna" and the word "more". And who cares if it does use similar lyrics??? The song kicks ass for a ballad, and it has a really powerful message.
The songs also have a very similar rhythm, tone, flow, and general sound. Also I made the effort of not just highlight words that both songs contained, but if you listened to both songs, you can see that they are the same place in the song as well. The only reason I am even able to say "same place" is because the lyrics and flow of both songs manage to arrive at the chourus at a similar "point" in the song. The duration of the first and second verses for Unfaithful is :25 and the verses for Lonely No More is :24, the duration of the chorus for Unfaithful is :26 and the chorus for Lonely No More is :22, keep in mind Rihanna has that little pause at the end of the chorus for Unfaithful ;), also the prechorus for Unfaithful starts only 1 or 2 seconds before the chorus for Lonely No More, also while Unfaithful has a prechorus that lasts :12 in front of the first two choruses and only a verse lasting :26 in front the third chorus, Lonely No More has verses in front of the chourus every time, starts it's vocals four seconds later, and a much longe extro. The songs in their entirety differ only by four seconds. I am not trying to accuse Rihanna or anyone for that matter for stealing anyone elses music, nor I am trying to somehow protect Rob Thomas. The first time I heard Unfaithful I like the song as it was, but did notice that it seemed somehow familiar, after all, it wasn't the first song by her that had existing origins elsewhere. I am not a fan of Rob Thomas, I barely listen to his music, thruth be told this was the only reason I have. I am more of a fan of Rihanna if anything and I am not writing this to try and bash or demean her in anyway, after all, her record company gives her a song to do, and she does it, well. If anyone has anyway of contacting anyone affiliated wiuth either of there two artists or their record companies please do so I don't care how long a respone will take, as a person with a general interest in music I would want nothing more than to see this matter concluded and the arguement and speculation solved, either way, for good.
This song sucks ass. Some teenage star telling her "painful" relationship experiences. It really sucks ass. Painbearer 09:07, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Similarity" that is too broad 

message: I had linked a techno remix of this song, but the page was reverted. Many song pages mention alternate versions of songs, but what I linked was marked as unnecessary. Often, DJs or cover artists without Wikipedia pages are included in sections discussing the song in other media, and they are allowed to remain in the section. My link to DJ RB SaUCe's song merely allows readers to know about another interpretation of the song. As long as I mention that Flash is required, is it OK to replace the section?
Here's the link: http://www.reverbnation.com/djrbsauce  
MariachiMello (talk) 04:58, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: NO. DJ RB Sauce (which I assume is you, since you've added his name to tons of pages) is not notable according to WP:MUSIC. Just because something exists doesn't mean it should be on WP. Conical Johnson (talk) 03:35, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remixes 

message: I check pages listed in :Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of :Unfaithful (song)'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "aCharts":
From Rude Boy (song): 
From Pussycat Dolls: 
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:36, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphaned references in [[:Unfaithful (song)]] 

message: The Background and release needs to be c/e. It reads like a fan and there are too many quotes. Calvin • Watch n' Learn 13:51, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Points 

message: I have finished a copy edit of the article. 
*The one thing that jumped out was the block quotation. A lot of it can be paraphrased into original prose. It is simply facts that you can write in your own words. And the "He is one of the sweetest, sweetest people I've ever met, ever worked with. He's an amazing songwriter." part has to go. I'm sorry. ;-) 
:* Done. I added some information into the prose. — Tomica1111 • Question Existing? 21:18, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: *Could you make it flow chronologically and in the order everything? It just reads like a story, and someone tells another story, when both happen at the same time. Could you fix that? Thanks. —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ]  23:15, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: *I clarified it a bit, but I am not sure how it looks. Please check it. — Tomica1111 • Question Existing? 23:24, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: *Better. I'll have a closer look tomorrow. —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ]  00:28, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

text: *Haha I meant outlets :), changed. — Tomica1111 • Question Existing? 21:18, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: *The problem is that iTunes itself is an outlet.  So via iTunes does not make sense. —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ]  23:12, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

text: Done. — Tomica1111 • Question Existing? 21:18, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

text: Thanks for commenting and c/e Penguin. If you see something that kills your eyes, be free to c/e ! — Tomica1111 • Question Existing? 21:18, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Anytime. —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ]  23:12, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments regarding Background and release 

message: Hey Tomica. Sorry that I'm late. I'll copy edit and list concerns as I go. 
*I've generally opposed to the wording "second international single". By "international", do you mean "released outside the United States"? That would be more accurate. However, if not, then the word "international" is redundant.
*"there was some unfavorable criticism of the lyrics, which one reviewer said were "devoid of remorse"." - keep it general. Simply say "... while others criticized the lyrics." —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ]  11:38, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the comments and the c/e Penguin. I think I resolved the given issues. Check them. Waiting for others. — Tomica (talk) 13:48, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

text: *Not actually. I only found what is in the Background section. You think the information is pretty general? It's pretty hard that kind of information, because the song is from 2006 :S ! — Tomica (talk) 14:20, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: *Have you tried books. Probably not as Google Books has no previews and they don't come cheap. I'll continue my copy edit though. —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ]  14:45, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: *I will try searching something. Only source that I have is this one, however, in it is conceptualized the song's composition. Could I possibly use something else from it in the composition? — Tomica (talk) 15:02, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP Comments 

message: http://www.zobbel.de/cluk/080216cluk.txt  — AARON • TALK   21:13, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  UK 2008 peak at #193 

message: The band is not from Australia, but from Arkansas..  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.86.46.144 (talk) 04:19, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evanescence 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 9 external links on Unfaithful (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/65s5XjjIC?url=http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/may10/articles/stargate.htm to http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/may10/articles/stargate.htm
*Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mtv.co.uk%2Fmusic%2Fcharts%2Fofficial-uk-countdowns%2Frihanna-official-top-20&date=2011-10-01 to http://www.mtv.co.uk/music/charts/official-uk-countdowns/rihanna-official-top-20
*Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rap-up.com%2F2010%2F03%2F20%2Fdirector-anthony-mandler-discusses-rihannas-music-video-evolution&date=2011-11-19 to http://www.rap-up.com/2010/03/20/director-anthony-mandler-discusses-rihannas-music-video-evolution/
*Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ifpicr.cz%2Fhitparada%2Findex.php%3Fhitp%3DR&date=2011-10-02 to http://www.ifpicr.cz/hitparada/index.php?hitp=R
*Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ifpicr.cz%2Fhitparadask%2Findex.php%3Fhitp%3DR&date=2011-10-02 to http://www.ifpicr.cz/hitparadask/index.php?hitp=R
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120323165026/http://austriancharts.at/2006_single.asp to http://www.austriancharts.at/2006_single.asp
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150217213338/http://www.hitlistan.se/netdata/ghl002.mbr/lista?liid=43&dfom=20060001&newi=0&height=420&platform=Win32&browser=MSIE&navi=no&subframe=Mainframe to http://www.hitlistan.se/netdata/ghl002.mbr/lista?liid=43&dfom=20060001&newi=0&height=420&platform=Win32&browser=MSIE&navi=no&subframe=Mainframe
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110707000200/http://hitparade.ch/year.asp?key=2006 to http://hitparade.ch/year.asp?key=2006
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110720210133/http://www.fmqb.com/Article.asp?id=69239 to http://www.fmqb.com/Article.asp?id=69239
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:21, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Unfaithful (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111217011430/http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/showbiz/music-news/2011/10/11/review-rihanna-live-at-the-secc-glasgow-86908-23481026/ to http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/showbiz/music-news/2011/10/11/review-rihanna-live-at-the-secc-glasgow-86908-23481026/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:12, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified