Talk:Telltale Games

message: The info box is titled "HOz41" instead of "Telltale Games".Technitai 15:49, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, the page is fully protected but tagged ; either the tag or the protection level should be changed. --ais523 16:04, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Hoz411 is a user that was banned from the telltale site the other day :( Omicronian 02:21, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. ---J.S  (T/C/WRE) 18:33, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I removed the following
:This is currently the most popular television show in America, with all of the top five viewed shows during the fall season of 2005 being episodes of CSI.
I would suggest the popularity of the TV show in the US is largely irrelevant. It obviously has some relevance but especially given that there had already been earlier CSI games, the real issue is surely how popular earlier games were rather then the popularity of the TV show. Also, why should we only talk about the popularity of CSI in the US? Nil Einne 16:03, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  CSI 

message: When this is unlocked maybe someone would like to add a section along the lines of: Telltale games announced an interest in working on the new Nintendo Wii console, due to it's suitability for Adventure games, and asked their fans to contact Nintendo to facilitate this. Talks were held between Nintendo and Telltales and appear to be sucessful as on the 25th January 2006, Telltale Games announced a job opportunity for a Wii developer. http://www.telltalegames.com/company/jobs#wiiguy —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 87.80.116.129 (talk) 16:14, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Future Console Support 

message: Should there be a Template 68.109.165.199 (talk) 20:57, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template 

message: This IGN article claims they have a Game of Thrones title coming, but reading between the lines, its clear they have no official confirmation of it yet. But this is something to watch out for.  --MASEM (t) 22:36, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Game of Thrones game possibly coming 

message: The entry regarding technical issues is based on a single editorial piece and is the only citable article regarding the subject. The cited article is an opinion piece and uses phrases such as "wonderful in many ways as they may be, have been accompanied by an undercurrent of fan range" and uses anecdotes from support forms as reference. Citing a single opinion piece doesn't meet Wikipedia's standards and the entry should be removed until more citations from non-opinion based articles become available.
(The above requested edit was made by clicking on a link in an automatically added notice.)
:It would be helpful to get input from others about this. I have never heard that just because there's the only citable article for a viewpoint, it shouldn't be used. But, the intention is absolutely to provide a balanced perspective. I double-checked and the author is a features editor and there is editorial control of the content, just reiterating your point about it being citable.--CaroleHenson (talk) 08:03, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you sure it's the only citable source? I'm finding more searching google news.--CaroleHenson (talk) 08:13, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems fine to me. Joseph2302 (talk) 23:59, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request edit on 27 March 2015 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Telltale Games. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://uk.gamespot.com/pc/adventure/samandmaxseason1/news.html?sid=6189014&om_act=convert&om_clk=newsfeatures&tag=newsfeatures;title;2
*Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/6DIkfQfV5?url=http://www.1up.com/news/episodic-gaming-challenges to http://www.1up.com/do/newsStory?cId=3163746
*Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/6DIkiXam9?url=http://www.shacknews.com/article/46193/telltale-ceo-dan-connors-on to http://www.shacknews.com/featuredarticle.x?id=266
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:49, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Final line of the opening needs a citation. 24.117.58.251 (talk) 05:36, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: No, the lead does not require citations per WP:CITELEAD. The specific content is sourced in the body. Lordtobi (✉) 07:22, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

text: Not done: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the  template. Hhkohh (talk) 17:51, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 23 September 2018 

message: When the studio let go of most of the staff a couple weeks ago, we had official word this was happening. Right now with the claims the remaining crew were let go today, this is not yet an official statement, so while it is fair to include in the body, we should not put it in the lede without an official statement. --Masem (t) 06:11, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Lordtobi always reverts, you know. He does not wait for the official stuff. Sebastian James (talk) 11:29, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Weird, I don't recall mass-reverting Masem on his well-developed common sense, and also haven't interfered with this section's topic (you can tell because it's still not in the lead). Given that you have no point here, I can only assume that you created this reply solely to harass. I figure WP:HA and WP:CNH might be good reads for you. Cheers. Lordtobi (✉) 13:19, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Since when telling the truth is harrasment? I did use hyperbole, but you are the overreacting one. Sebastian James (talk) 18:51, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Accusing someone of something they didn't do is not truth. Reach Out to the Truth 20:17, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

text: They didn't do, huh? I guess, you should stop defending your "friend" (you might even be close to him, who knows) and search what we are talking about. Sebastian James (talk) 06:45, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: You're not really good at playing the blame game. I never intefered with the exclusion Masem mentioned above, so your inital comment was already out of line. Now that someone points out to you that you are objectively wrong, you accuse them of sockpuppetry. If this is your primary intent here, you're not here to constructively contribute to Wikipedia. Lordtobi (✉) 06:52, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The possibility of someone being the other one's friend, and defending them without the facts are not sockpuppetry. I did reply Masem's comment 'cause I always see you reverting stuff and not waiting for an official statement (which is what you have been doing on TG). You may not be the one Masem's referring to, but you clearly add some "reliable sources" (they are, in fact, rumors/allegations). The rest of this reply has been deleted by me, I do not intend to reply this section again. Because, again, Telltale never said they canceled their upcoming games, you know. Sebastian James (talk) 07:28, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: We had this discussion already. Masem and I agreed that the fate of TWD4 was unknown (there was a commented out version for the table, in case it gets officially cancelled, which you kept edit warring over for some reason) and the other games were effectively cancelled because there was no one left to develop them. What you did is pone your own stance, which is fine, but then edit war over that without even trying to discuss. What do you expect happens in such a scenario? I've asked you not to edit war in the past (for example in regards to the Detroit: Become Human article), but there, you also only concluded on blaming other people (including calling the article's principal editor a "disturbing troll" when they called you out for disruptive editing) instead of seeking a civilized discussion and seek consensus for your disputed changes. WP:EW and WP:STATUSQUO apply to everyone, even you. But it should serve as reason for you to blame others for adhering to policy. Your above comment is just another indicator that you don't care. Bother reading WP:CNH. Lordtobi (✉) 08:06, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  On the latest news (Oct 4) 

message: According to most gaming media websites, Telltale is under assignment proceedings, which are different from bankrputcy proceedings, so why does this article say that Telltale is bankrupt while it is actually under assignment? Quetstar (talk) 22:19, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: From an end-reader perspective, I don't see much difference in the terms. Both are cases that the company had gone under for failing to be able to pay off its current debts and expenditures. Assignment is just a faster process than bankruptcy --Masem (t) 22:46, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bankruptcy or Assignment? 

message: It shouldn't be a battle to update the following line when it is sourced.
"family-friendly games like Minecraft: Story Mode, Batman, and Guardians of the Galaxy only due to ease of porting these to the Switch, while older games like The Walking Dead require more effort to port."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paul "The Wall" (talk • contribs) 13:44, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: There's nothing wrong with that like outside of tense. It is saying that for the Switch they were starting with those family friendly titles and may go on to later ones. Didn't say they'd never port TWD. But that line was written prior to the closure, so I had to rework the tenses to reflect it was plans before the big shutdown. --Masem (t) 14:09, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  TWD Season 1 and 4 are on Switch