lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Round and Round the Garden

message: We could have borrowed something from E2. JFW | T@lk 00:07, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes I had seen that link (there are very few obvious direct hits on performing a Google search) - but it hardly adds much and certainly is not a WP:RS :-) Its own source is to  whose program pictures remind me of Play School (UK TV series) (ah).  David Ruben  Talk  02:10, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Borrow from E2

message: It was mentioned at least as early as 1951 in Opie's Oxford Dictionary of Nursery Rhymes. In the Roud Folk Song Index is has number 19235. JFW | T@lk 21:30, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opie 

message: http://www.fun-baby-games-online.com/infant-game-online.html  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.113.96.60 (talk) 09:57, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relatec ryhmes
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject User scripts/Scripts/Quick wikify

message: is there a way to make the tag appear while reading the article, as opposed to while editing?  thanks, ~thesublime514 • talk 00:14, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

message: This would be incredibly useful for Wikibooks, and other projects which regularly import WP articles as seed material. If you're able to make this work in reverse, that would be amazing! – Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 21:29, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  How 'bout Quick de-wikify?
Talk:Jenny (TV series)

message: Someone keeps replacing the name of actor "George Hamilton" with "Harry Sheerer".  Harry Sheerer was not on this show, nor is the show even listed on Harry Sheerer's Wikipedia page.  Odd.HedgeHogPower (talk) 19:38, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: On January 1, someone replaced the name of actor Dale Godboldo with Daniel Stern and actor Carolyn Hennesy with Courtney Cox.  Reverted.  Credits are available here on imdb .  This is not the first time these credits have been vandalized. HedgeHogPower (talk) 22:29, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism
Talk:Chemaxon

message: Just changed this page around. I think it should answer your concerns about advert like. I am now visiting other pages to link to this one. 84.3.49.187 (talk) 11:59, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have declined the "speedy" deletion, and let me know if it gets tagged for speedy deletion again.  But if it's tagged for WP:AfD, which is a 7-day deletion discussion, there's not a lot I can do unless you find (preferably) newspaper, magazine, journal or book references (or their online versions) that establish the notability of your product. - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 19:43, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertising/deletion 
Talk:List of Batman television series cast members

message: Talk page with no talk? Where's the QA on this? What about King Tut/Victor Buono?Infinityseed (talk) 16:41, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: For that matter, why is the Batman TV series list incomplete by omitting Zelda the Great (Anne Baxter), the Archer (Art Carney), the Minstrel (Van Johnson), Ma Parker (Shelley Winters), Chandell & Harry (Liberace), the Sandman (Michael Rennie), Col. Gumm (Roger C. Carmel), Black Widow (Tallulah Bankhead), Lola Lasagna (Ethel Merman), Louie the Lilac (Milton Berle), Olga Queen of the Cossacks (Anne Baxter again), Nora Clavicle (Barbara Rush), Calamity Jan (Dina Merrill), Cassandra (Ida Lupino), Cabala (Howard Duff), and Minerva (Zsa Zsa Gabor)? There was also a supporting criminal character who appeared on two separate occasions, Freddy the Fence (Jacques Bergerac). And why is the list for that series so strangely ordered?2601:545:8201:6290:6849:F96:E0A4:6926 (talk) 08:11, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Talk:Molecular pathology

message: Molecular pathology is much better characterized as a subdiscipline of clinical pathology, rather than of anatomic pathology. The majority of molecular tests do not involve any component of microscopy, which is the key feature of anatomic pathology.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.118.0.14 (talk) 13:04, August 26, 2007 (UTC) 
Molecular pathology is a combination of molecular biology and pathology, i.e. a study of molecular mechanism of pathological processes, which can also be used in clinical diagnosis, monitor and prognosis of clinical conditions. 72.187.128.198 (talk) 15:07, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

message: Hi,
I'm writing up Medical diagnostics, and reading the editorial outlining the Journal of Medical Diagnostics, which seems to treat the two as co-terminous:
:The Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP) was founded to bring together researchers, laboratory directors, technologists, trainees, and others devoted to molecular diagnostics. 
See also:
* Certification in molecular pathology - seems to use molecular diagnostics as a synonym  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drianmcdonald (talk • contribs) 22:13, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  How does this relate to Medical Diagnostics?
Talk:Clinical pathology

message: This specialty requires a medical residency and must not be confused with Biomedical science which is a field of science not medicine. Sinamore (talk) 14:56, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Poppets (sweets)

message: Paynes used to make Toffets as well as Poppets (the Toffets box said something like "Manufactured by Paynes, the Poppet people"). I have no idea if they are still in production, but they were certainly around when I was a child in the 1980s. 217.155.20.163 00:32, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Toffets? 
Talk:Portage Island

message: would like to add a map, but i don't know the protocol for finding maps that can be used. can you help? Murderbike 00:33, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Does anyone know anyone or someone who would know anyone from the Lummi Nation who could maybe get comment on this? Generic land stats are fine and all, but I would really be interested to know what kinds of use or preservation are proposed or currently undertaken by their community for this island that they own. Ahfretheim (talk) 03:20, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for Comment
Talk:Marlowe (1969 film)

message: it´s winnie the poo  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A0A:A540:C0A:0:B9E7:BEB5:A7E3:EF0E (talk) 09:37, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hi 

message: This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB.
Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 21:10, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of "needs infobox" tag
Talk:Banjolin

message: I'd be glad to help with wikifying, but don't see what aspect of the article as it stands now offends. Certainly there aren't many articles that start with bullets, but I'd say these are four distinct first paragraphs. The alternative I see is to replace this with a disambiguation page and four sub-par, low-content pages. Or maybe rename this page to acknowledge it as one content-heavy disambiguation page? --Eitch 00:43, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: April 07 call for wikifying
Talk:The Impossible Years

message: The play isn't about the younger daughter "emulating her older sister's misadventures"; that's only a sort of punchline at the end. The play is about the parents trying to keep the older daughter in line. — TheHerbalGerbil(TALK|STALK), 02:02, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot completely inaccurate
Talk:Mighty Jack

message: I disagree with the romanization for the title, as I believe it should be Maiti Jakku. Spelling it Maitei Jakku creates confusion with the actual pronunciation; plus, if the latter were true, wouldn't the title be written as マイテイジャック (note the case of the fourth character)? I think we've also moved past the point where チ and ち are romanized as ti instead of their proper romanization of chi. Tony Myers 05:29, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Romanization 
Talk:Murder a la Mod

message: We have a la Mod and à la Mod at present.
Which is correct? Varlaam (talk) 04:23, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Pedantically speaking, the accented version is the correct form... but even in French, the accent is often omitted on capital letters, which is what the opening credits of the film use. Go figure. Muzilon (talk) 22:25, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: If it was thought to be lost, how come De Palma was able to use some of it in another much later film?
Commercially unavailable, fine. Lost..? Lovingboth (talk) 00:10, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I've just done a major rewrite of the article. I've said the film was "rarely seen" rather than "lost." Muzilon (talk) 04:52, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thought lost?
Talk:Lynden Air Cargo

message: The article fails to explain the airline's relationship with Lynden Transport, which uses the same name and very similar logo, and has been around for a lot longer than 1995. RadioKAOS  –  Talk to me, Billy  00:16, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Grand Orient of Italy

message: "Most North American grand lodges, on the other hand, still recognize the Grand Orient."
That is not so. The US Grand Lodges are in amity with the United Grand Lodge of England, and thus, consider the Grand Orient irregular and clandestine.--Craxd (talk) 20:19, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Wrong. Read the list of recognised GLs from the Grand Lodge of Pennsylvania. While the UGLE like to think that they are the arbiters of "true" masonry, there are many instances where American lodges differ. Fortunately, they are grown up enough not to fall out of amity about such trivia. Fiddlersmouth (talk) 23:32, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Impossibility about the Grand Orient in the US. 
Talk:Florence L. Crawford

message: Currently this article does not demonstrate notability and as such is subject to deletion unless reliable third party sources are added. Aboutmovies 20:01, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: I think the "notability" of this woman would be more apparent if the article was better researched and better written.
The first paragraph of this article is written in a manner that is very enigmatic, strange, and confusing. Florence Crawford, it says, was not the founder of the Apostolic Faith Mission, but she did "begin that movement." I have no idea what that means, and I don't think the average reader would either.
What is the difference between the AFM and "that movement"? What is "that movement"?
Various sources refer to Florence Crawford as founder of the Apostolic Faith Church, which today is a significant denomination, earlier known as the Apostolic Faith Mission. If the author has found new information that proves that she wasn't the founder, this needs to be spelled out, or at least sourced. 
Then it is said that the Apostolic Faith Mission was "initially" a "satellite church from the original Apostolic Faith Mission" associated by Seymour (in Los Angeles). Again, numerous sources say the opposite - that Crawford and/or an associate stole Seymour's mailing list and left for Oregon where they started a new organization that had absolutely nothing to do with Seymour. Again, if the author of this article has new information on this subject that counters what has been said by other sources, then this needs to be explained with the sources identified.
The "much ado" reference to Crawford being a woman is too vague to be in an encyclopedic entry. Various women entered the evangelistic field by the 1880s and early 1890s. If this really was such a significant issue as late as 1907, then it needs sources and references.
The final paragraph refers to her as "leader of the Apostolic Faith Mission." If she wasn't the founder, then who was? This needs to be stated. If she "began that movement" but didn't found the organization, then the difference needs to be explained.
In general, this article needs references, sources, and likely better research.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mtnbuilder (talk • contribs) 14:14, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability and Role of Florence Crawford in Apostolic Faith Church 

message: I have redirected this page to Apostolic Faith Church, where there is already a good deal of information about her. There is not enough information about her for a separate article. --MelanieN (talk) 00:26, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirected
Talk:Enter Laughing

message: What does "two too many girlfriends" mean? Does he have two and need none? Or three and need one? Or rather he has ten but can only financially support eight? Leaves one to wonder. Jxmorris (talk) 04:51, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't find anything ambiguous about the statement, he has two more girlfriends more than any one of them will accept in monogamy.  Two plus one equal three. Cheers 009o9 (talk) 05:56, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Festival (1967 film)

message: I think the name of the article should be changed to "Festival!". That's really the name of the movie and then you can omit the (1967 film) part. Also it wouldn't be mistaken with the Festival article when linking to it. Thanks :)
Ore4444 (talk) 12:56, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name Change
Talk:In the Year 2889 (film)

message: It is set in a mansion in a mountain valley. Elemming (talk) 07:46, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Dallas?

message: This article for the film is severely underdeveloped and needs to be expanded in far more detail than what it currently has, it doesn't even have any sources cited. There needs to be information on the film's plot, production, release, reception and home media release added to the article or else it will be deleted as well as sources cited. All of this needs to happen if it is to meet Wikipiedia's standards.--Paleface Jack (talk) 23:13, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article in Dire Need of expansion
Talk:Kansas State Department of Education

message: this is linked to by ... 
* Kansas
* Wikipedia:WikiProject Kansas
It's in the "WikiProject Kansas/to do" list .... looking a few things up ... will add to this ....  00:56, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why is the Brown case mentioned on this page?  It seems to have no relevance to this article, since the board in question was apparently the Topeka board.  Can someone explain the connection to the state board of education?  Kgwo1972 23:19, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I am deleting the section on Brown per my above comments.  Kgwo1972 17:20, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka
Talk:Mad Monster Party?

message: I always thought that Francesca was modelled on sultry Lauren Bacall with her low, husky voice rather than Ginger which was in itself a take off of Marilyn Monroe. MBG 119.11.1.93 (talk) 12:59, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Who is Francesca? Her name is dropped into the plot description with no explanation.Ttenchantr (talk) 06:59, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Fancesca

message: The stage musical section keeps being reinserted into the article. The last couple edits before I removed it were adjustments to the names of the musical numbers it purports would be in such a musical. Does anyone think this is worth protecting this page over? Since it seems to be a reoccurring problem?
The smilodon (talk) 12:51, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The stage musical material was added again on 23:15, December 29, 2011 by User talk:71.183.180.152‎; I deleted the material today, as I could find no such musical via a search on google, or in the upcoming stage shows on playbill.com. This article seems to be a target. I do not know what the rules are for protection, but I put the article on my watch list at least.Flami72 (talk) 13:17, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The stage musical was re-added, by a new IP User_talk:71.183.184.217; I have deleted that material. I searched google and checked the upcoming shows at Playbill.com, with no such musical found.Flami72 (talk) 23:10, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: For the record--this article is included in the list of articles vandalized by many IPs, see [Broadway Hoaxer]. It would probably be prudent to request reliable sources for any supposed "stage musical" entries by an IP per WP:VERIFY. Flami72 (talk) 10:58, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Continued Stage musical problem 

message: Regarding the IP and two users (all the same person I suspect) who keep trying to add info about this I have done an extensive search in both google and bing and I can find no info about any production that is being worked on at the moment. I did come across a 2004 article in Variety but that is over 8 years ago now. Unless something can be found about any current attempts to adapt this I do not think it belongs in the article. MarnetteD | Talk 03:43, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Live action remake

message: This may fall under "trivia" or maybe it makes for a good footnote residing in the "talk" section? The reason Frankenstein's monster is being called "Fang" , all has to do with Phyllis Diller. When she did stand up comedy routines on Ed Sullivan , or other shows in the 1960s & 70s , whenever she mentioned her husband , he was called "Fang". Usually described as a "big lug" , or "stupid". ( i.e. a made up spouse , used for free-form abuse. ). 75.104.163.77 (talk) 20:09, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "FANG"
Talk:Mount Washington (British Columbia)

message: So, what else can you add?
70.66.141.145 (talk) 00:09, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry for deleting your contribution. Look in the article's history page for the reason. Things you could add, that come to my mind: weather history, geological information, first climb, namegiver, social and economic history... But an article doesn't have to be long to be good. The important stuff should be in it, not more. If you want you can look at other articles about mountains to see what has been added there! Good night from Germany! --Kricket (talk) 20:44, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

text: and you can look at the project pages, linked in the boxes above!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kricket (talk • contribs) 20:46, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Le Départ

message: Hi! 
The title of this article is now The Departure. It was changed from Le Départ by . I'm extremely surprised of this. I wrote 99% of the long french article and read almost all that was written about this movie, I never saw The Departure as english title. For exemple, in Sight and Sound, in a short review in Spring 1968 (p.108) and in an interview of Skolimowski in Summer 1968 (p.142) it's called by the french title Le Départ. I'd like to know where does the name The Departure comes from (does it mean there is a reference about the movie I don't have?) Thank you if you can explain me.--Soboky (talk) 07:45, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 21:38, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The Departure (1967 film) →  – multiple:
# WP:NATURAL favours a title which avoids parenthetic disambiguator. A user is more likely to know the film's French title than its year of production.
# WP:NCF#Foreign-language films says use the commonest title of release in English-language markets. I believe this commonest was the French title in 1967-9 first run and for most video releases, but am open to correction. The New York Times matches depart and not departure.  It is on Netflix in Ireland as le départ. 
# It's hard to verify, but it seems the untranslated name is somewhat more common in English sources, so WP:UE is overridden by WP:COMMONNAME
# As the article states, The Departure is an inaccurate translation in the context. The NYT report from Berlin 1967 translates it "The Start".
Other relevant info: Moved in 2010 from :Le départ by  in 2010 with summary "WP:UE and WP:NCF".   objected in 2016. The name on screen is all lowercase le départ and the French convention for titles would be titlecase Le départ, but English sources prefer Le Départ. jnestorius(talk) 21:15, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 14 December 2022
Talk:Chronology of European exploration of Asia

message: "The Portuguese Vasco de gama, accompagnied by Nicolau Coelho and Bartolomeu Dias, is the first to reach India by sea. "
The first what? Portuguese, or European? As if it's the latter that would not make much sense -- Eudoxus of Cyzicus, a famous Ancient Greek explorer (European!) crossed the Arabian Sea in 130 BCE, a millennium and a half before de Gama. This really should be clarified. I've also noticed that such early (Antiquity) explorations of Asia have been left out of this, except for the Sino-Roman relations... mike4ty4 01:02, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Eudoxus of Cyzicus should indeed be mentionned. He openned the way for Greek ships sailing from Egypt to India. PHG (talk) 04:54, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It must be mentioned though that Eudoxos came from the Asian Greek city of Cyzicus and was working for the Hellenistic rulers of Egypt. One could therefore say that he was an Asian explorer working for an African country and thus would not belong in this article on European exploration. Takeaway 14:03, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Huh? 

message: Are these people Asian or European?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Takeaway (talk • contribs) 22:05, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Greco-Bactrians and Indo-Greeks?
Talk:Steven Whitehurst

message: Steven Whitehurst, or WikiDefeater, as he is known around his hometown, is the one man that single handedly took down the Wikipedia Empire.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tylertheplokm (talk • contribs) 17:40, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is an RfC on the question of using "Religion: None" vs. "Religion: None (atheist)" in the infobox on this and other similar pages. 
The RfC is at Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion. 
Please help us determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 03:22, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion|Request for Comments]] 

message: Is this person notable enough for a Wikipedia article?  Based on this entry, he was a local political volunteer, worked at a college, self-published two books, and has written some op-eds.  Google returns virtually nothing.  I'm sure he's a lovely man, but...?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.209.50.92 (talk) 11:56, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability?
Talk:Cat and Dupli-cat

message: The goof seems more of an intentional joke to me. Lots42 (talk) 04:23, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Goof 

message: Delete unsourced trivia
98.254.83.35 (talk) 20:14, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please be more specific about what needs to be changed. Favonian (talk) 13:32, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request from 98.254.83.35, 28 December 2010 

message: ===Trivia===
*This is one of the shorts where Tom loses with another cat. The others are Sufferin' Cats, Smarty Cat, Casanova Cat, Jerry's Cousin, Saturday Evening Puss, Tennis Chumps, Catty-Cornered and A Mouse in the House.
Inxroad (talk) 15:19, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Done Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Reaper Eternal (talk) 17:50, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  remove unsourced trivia 

message: *This is one of the shorts where Tom loses with another cat. The others are Sufferin' Cats, Smarty Cat, Casanova Cat, Jerry's Cousin, Saturday Evening Puss, Tennis Chumps, Catty-Cornered and A Mouse in the House.
Inxroad (talk) 15:19, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Done Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Reaper Eternal (talk) 17:50, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Trivia